Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA97-070
S 6in Sr / C m 5 SE./629 �� / CZ e m / a j — GARAGE \� - -N f " N89'42'21•W 113.82' (115'+/-DEED) AI/ .7 ff.rn -..• • .1 1-1 '-,--7---..,.. /,----., 4.----.76—//:-... /,----,- ,/,„---...„ 4.:---.., ,/::..---.... ,,,--- ; /.0/ - / / / //.//a0 9: O z L (/ 1/\s/ 2/ 3' 4<•.____5/ 6/• 7/ 8/ �f/, • .M // / • /•:. --, , 10 7/ "./,,, ,, 0 / - c.. - r'l III. villa Il ....... , ./: . p of j'h �TOM MITI—• • U�`L� �� �,iO well a%.> 1� xF o PROJECT DATA W R 1. iI/unl • a I a Qj w TOTAL SITE AREA.T301sa Fr LI ,l - - / • ,/ x 2N PROPOSED BUILDING SCBIARE FOOTAGE 11 I i, H.. I� / M� O� • OVERALL TOBUILDING T 63525D�SFTQ R.PER FLOOR _J / _ 0 - I u 1 .- .. / 'V / WETO xo • PERCENT LOT COVERAGE•W3x / All'" —J , •• ,' Z o PARKING ANALYSIS TWPM.TH9 ... a .. �--Fxlsro,;WEE /. ' , Lw U TOTAL MISER SPACES REOIIRID•LT5 PER DUELLRIG WIT • ..11 BE RT»hD _g To¢E R3vrID • / A. Drib EXCEPTION PER.REC. -'�' • 1 Z O c.1 •_115(6 WITS)•CA(II SPACES) / '1 ''' D y.R,. /-9511130914 k my EXHIBIT 17( 11 ♦=4 0 589.42'21-E 55.98. ' 6.06' '• MAP FOR ADDITIONAL R.O.W. - --- TOTAL x RIMER SPACES PROPOSED•10 SPACES '�— — --- OR PROPOSED Rf...NT 2 U (5L20'STANDARD`RACES) 62.04 MEAS.(62.95'DEED) ad PER APPROVED DEVIATION - PTA 2 Q ' FRO,PARING Si4FIDARDS (E)P.SP.Y L POLE eD TOTAL LANDSCAPED AREA•R45 so.FT - - S 1th ST • �" ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT•95 FT. ,••••... ... (� 9Or - - ....' s sv,r,I 1-ueD soy �eL rr'A rSu a'a n, PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT.35 Fr. , ---iir 1D06' lir'— n,99' 5 83',5':5'E BIIILDMG SETBACKS - ts.39,_I'F_�iDD, on.n,.T.nT -FRONT I REAR YAW RECIIIRED•5 FT. - FRONT I REAR YARD PROPOSED•0 R.PER EXCEPTION,FROVIDMG PRIVATE BALCONIES • SIDE YARD•CORER LOT FEGVIRED•10 FT,ADM I FT.FOR EA _ i STORY IN EXCESS OF 2 • . • SIDE YARD PR'1POAFO•II FT. • _ - - , OEM,rme - SITE PLAN - - f- _ 6-PLEX _ • _ _ _• SCALE: AS SHOW__ _ - _ __ _ __ :�l_ ___�- --_____ r 1 - PLOT DATE: 5R091 •• -- /\ / / / CAD FILE R2-AI-00 PEW MGR: DRAFTER. SF SP SUSI SE •SIIE PLAN - -PLEX -�.sI 0 5' 10' 25' 41.� •• NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ._, -'i., % - " ' -P" ' 1•:, . ' >.-'1° 14.L1. 1 `.. .1--',..' —1, l' c'‘, 4_,r11 . ----4-i—,;..,-1—„ —,,,'-7,•Er?-4T1.,,.il.s.,.1-tii•,,:14 ,z7" P.:•,7::i•;, '..:. . e... % ',. '-!' -:- 0 - .1 1,1 w',- v‘i: V-0 4'....::(:-.:4''.q:9!1,,, ,,n''\.z .•.:.7 \ ... ...„ 1 1.,R07,,,,,,,coui,cv _4. a.....,I.,_ ::...:1.:5it7z:11,_::s.ii:leririuwil..cKe:.,2...,:m....r,:u.ffirt14:,,, 1 - —--. " ,r3417"111"71.,51, col iztil 44 llg, --.7.--s. ILQP*. -:-..,,..- ., s ,, ,,,„,,;:L,.... q ZOPtilEin ,WH/TWORTH -I---1!------- ... ' ' 4" 5; 1'4 1 ;•1'-i''.i,-;k1-1- 0., . Er, '' '"-.i .1 •gjerponr,mmo_ip IUD 4[MR 5. ..r,;. %, •3: :,.; ,- „ I NO' • - • '' - • •" 'MORRIS ,.., -' AO .6k tigiViTii;!ti :20 1 .1-i--1—1._ . ,L,,,...si., i-6:,... •1 ER. . , L. _.... .., i ' I t.H.1.1.127ei., roT:ii-.1.:,-,.: :.',ki..1- ,r,„.22. 1 V,yogi:jig-1V%, r,Fongs lig a 8 0 1 .a ..., SM/THERS I .2.—J ••• i.„,...1.„„. ....., ;; • _,L, '\\I-111:t.,::i—a.,' -w. P* c • 1E. R...,4: '1-1• tt RURLIN819.NC •I''C. .5.4 1'1.1 1 1-'716 <5, , ui th -au 1 ad i PI,'61 L.CO I4NI.--•,5 I u,I oN I•+to-..I-. •-- .0 , , • .....i., ....A,i.1,. ...I ..,L7_17.4-J.,._..L.L—.:. 2-. , • tIV mi I \i/ 1 • • i, ./ , •---L_F---7. • •"....,,,, , .‘1,,.:', a' ,,]d.to t,,,0 tur-c , • c., .6 : t . ....,. a a_lf :•f- - ,---1 I • ..--V,' C'-'t r• 43 t.-i-m[-I4PPE.141rn..s-04,• . ,/,..• r •••••z 2, i..••0= ' G"..2 ' •• '• • - ..., NH go: —.L.",...R . • \ j i .• r' <5‘. *. %A. ,...' --".-:..' 5 e....3. ••. ' - •. a 0..... -— "anitY arreits-, " ..1, 4,.,,,, / z„......... `at'"F'"I",;1.k . ....... :-..1.... -' . 'C•N t 10,14) KM", C". VI .% %X'. oo • 'Iiitr:'11311.11OOMENICP °ENCL. CO SNP- CI -. I\,..,1‘....,1 40 a g g o :thi p El'. i — '. • 191. — ,..4 / ';';' g-iii6F?-f I • • • • W// Z S . I Q —I - 1„- .; ,,,Ass, I-'---I \\-y1t6, ' 3 z I s r,SHATTUC,K 1' , • ..>" ''' ' '.... P 91941g- (,) 4 al gm.; • X V ss A no .,,F F I` 1 0 4,,,E]5284:11 WHITWORTH ...,..... 1; _ e""fi r, Tr.,r_ , I fryv ,�7fI (� �e __!e' '9• MORRIS q ii�� 1 - z :Ha _ :.cur-�- -IV'„ /re _SM/THERS Z r .� �I ,i.k'� R w ,._�I'I: `rip T.g..0. , '- r0�F�SA}-± l`.li1,i) F L a P_ 1,1T � Is `alb " ®© •€'iF3i�flar7 .� T , I- if H. Rp \^i: K a ,--p " W ' .T , OAS �Laila�AJ-� .,-- ;m I fF}9 _ .. Nr,,.r .r A/*1n / �opn �' 1 BURNETT AVENUE FAMILY HOUSING Tonkin/Hoyne/Lokan iirtk a m � 633 BURNETT AVE SOUTH, RENTON, WA Architecture and Urban Design ARCHDIOCESAN HOUSING AUTHORITY -_I 0 3� 204 E,(Avenue SouW, FAX,(,1/eshiugtou 98104 Z CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES PHONE:(200)O24 7gB0/FAX:(20a)0z2 1708 • ai 110131.1i4.5.5 BxK6F°.Irv.® 1. VI i � m o' hll IN P �w . I..1 lu i 1 IMI 1 g 1 j1y d 0 III I- II' III, ,'is Rill IV ICI liiii1 Il-I I_SI R p . �n� 'II !! i m 9m r -5 o ff TT lel I'EI ICI °�I iiii - E-4 a Ns WEST ELEVTION (SMITHERS AVE.) SOUTH ELEVTION (SEVENTH-ST.) l IW boo 1 ± y� I_.I :: T I 1 DO -. 0- ICI � I o— Fit — �y�� x o a �W a NORTH ELEVATION py-i. �' EAST ELEVATION (BURNETT AVE.) ww xo F �O� W^E' o I yEBe �i _�—_ — 11 I I ` aq� N 4 1. E,r_ _1 " ....„ ., k. 1 , .., ' _ • i . ' =li- _ illi mini . eaA �mmn -A rzs �� •o� I: ��1( 41 imum DPAII.4 MIT ILIIVII- . .!al —71 Ent '-I_ ... limilli• — — 11 7-l'-‘'Il7 ... r bi j i 1 urea ELEVATIONS 4 FLOOR PLANS 6-PLEX SCALE ASONPJN THIRD FLOOR SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR PLOT DATE: 5118/57 CAD FILE: fd-A2-01 PROJ.MGR.:MI HAFTED: MI_ 0 FLOOR PLANS - 6-PLEX m 5' 10' 25' 4 . 412.P NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - . . . . . - - " . ' • • . - • - PLANT LIST • , QUANTITY PaCTAREAL MAME. Cca4M014 NAME_ 91Ze_ 4.3_ 1,1/9TE-3 0 g -Tite.55 cd 2 • ..,T, - : 1!. 2 Ikr-ER- CliSciNATUM VI,ev.nArL ALL. F'LANT5 • - CRATA5c-35 LAVALL5i - L_AvALL-e Ftwrrrice.14 a' c...._ 0 a• r rae.LiteliTeglA 11•4030LATA 6cs-os.AmTeas- e'cAL/iy-lo• SHALL ise.15t5 OR CONTAINE.R_ 3 pYR05 CAUL/II...IA CHAHTicasse rtaNE-RVIS 3E-Als. 2:CA,- I 5TYRAz JAEaNic., J.PANE-53 5H...15s,- GRoWN. / / .37 141,,Ho...11A 03.ieVaS,I.Ist- 4 MA4-101-11A AQUIroi-it.n.1 ig,2-1%D 6...a... 0 g i i ; 5 MAI-LaNiA.hero/trot/WM ,,,.,./3 5 HF205,5 _ 41111kkkriali‘\ - / . 0.go 1-1YReRic.0.4 CAL.y.rtut, SAINT Jot-lr-cwoo-r Ar pore 8".o... - • - 14 GALIL.-3IGX.IA 51-11,6664 SP.L.A.- J I C.,..l.II,,,:' 11.24 MAHONIA ACOIFOI-13I4 oft.e_c,ok-3.X...F.- -I 5‘3•^1••/18'i.. cA-mck. Ve..eiFy :"- „ . 11170'''WOUr:.111CF- - .4- 1V 413ter/ -----„,,ce w . Z63 MAisfx-liA nle.R.NA05.. CAscAces i-AA.no,,A. i..../.-',5" ri..m4T LI9T ,': i , 0 :',..' ''°' 6 P1346.15 JAP6.6,C-A JAPA33-53-Rams r z.V-30" ,....,... pi...i,,k AccuP.J..y...'. •,-1 0 i'-'17, -so 1:) ,‘...' • . , 0 4- TYPICAL;I lalAH031,4 GUIpcLIU ,/,' /,:c • 5 Niot-tp. ,4.116=1.4i3 0 0 la,,I.J./3• -L... • MAHCMIA 1.4E.V.V051.. / •.,T iF.Ty-IcA,--. I GRATA u....e.'.1 • . . , /....H0,1v.. t-IVevo , 1 .',.i. IS snuur 12IA StIALOO4 • I • . • Er-I Z"/I ap.i.... I 7. 0 i.A.,HONI t-IsAM= I2-I571 - . ' 1 •- PARKING \,AR-E.A t • . 6 MAHOHIA AASELOPE3/6. . -2'../5....- ' ' - ../--CRoW ESEP3 AP y- l'1,19Z.la A:Fog _I MEDIUM SARK SDEEP,E.Hcs.pr WITH UH[13.0 y . 12 MAIICO-RA.DIP-RN/05A 17.... ./1 110HE AA11.1ST PLANT5 153.0 • \ ' I ALLA C;=.C.1 PI 15:-a' I I . • I-K.051-1,-5,73131, PANIICLILATA-. 2"CAA.../sa'-qo.\ • ' -'n Thir7—•; s "‘ .'"-\\ •..,=.'' OTE.•HyPERictim B.AD gi/ALL - _I /-/1- lo-HIFF_McuM CA,(Ct,ILIM 1.PaT/9:a... 11 IAANOM Air- 3,5 12,15./1 ••••,-•-K-01•111,33//ED SMIX 53,11..‘}t Be /2"D.LEA/3),S'WIDe. 1 AP.A., 1 / 4 '' ' '''''s'..2 S.331.3 31210- (9"Toi.S../.3"DARe../raf.Ax) / — I ' -/',: (C. ..:r1------ - 1 I— IRO ../... / . C.. PLANT e-., D-TYPICAL. 5Ec• cn--A .. r. F ,::,MA11 Co.113.AptIllEc6.-10D1 2/-21, iltAV /...j; . CO. / • 1 1_11 m MAHaHA AIC.3‘..33.) VI/ . ..?- 0 - _ "PRP-1410W GRAve_Sco ..•••., - / ' A ,,,/ 1' -....14,‘ ‘ • . • r , •:.-/ , DI -)-- -1 -:,' .4.1 ' , •.,/,, ,,,,..,,,,,,, //, ,, • = • F4' 1 - - - .' . : c,....--57•110Y 5 INA MIX 5oll... > ,__. MrA BLENDED..r4 :': (..- -.'_ — d VI ' 1-4= . -•=c.5.• ... J 1. -/' = z,... L AIN hl - TYPICAL 5 CTIohl ..' Li i --/(- --__ tic-.Li ...,,7 / . cri .1,. . ' / F ,,,, 1.:.:. 1: / / ..... ..-.•/ ,—/ / Z .= / w cr . -,, — — Ir. ,'i2;:......1/„I. / 45t,./." . ... z' ,—, ,4•N eS . ' . . ,. .. •-• . .,.........-"' 0 /3 Ple.R.1.3414.1336/3‘cA 24:-sa" / • ' . M -A..-- / / , _ APPH,a/E-12 YIE- Sr) 3 P1313.13 JAPoi.1.6.4 24.-36 / " = 5 pyRUS g-A.r f,yAnIA. 'CHANTIcf_Esis 2"c.A.L. r•T•4 2 --t 2-51 fIS.STA.Rf---Si-nit-Lev PK.P5PoN - I STYR_Ax.3,6336A 2"CAL/3.-4* ___./ P4 Z _ • - - 33 IAA1-1/3,11A NeiRvos.A. I e-L 5"/1 GAL. _ .------.-- - . ---- . S. 7 t-h-.---S7.— - / • _ /--—-- - —?7 -—,— - L A N D S CAPE PLAN _ i OWING 15. . ir—15,RK MULC.14 S DEEF/0014E-.AT.TRUNK S CA L E. _ _ / . , - . . PLANT PIT T3,., ..,,'CS RccTRA, 1 - / _ - = -- ---------.-....__/ ••.• : '47 -\_, ' /-----,-- S-9 -4-4--' -APPRover, PRE.-M(RE0 pi.i.k..yr 5„, - _ Rem.ve AU-1.404-p0u,cale.A.-e:..t-e-.5- _ / - OWING TIM_ / FLANJ .TREE. PLATING - TyptcA,L DETAILS - / ' - . PLOT DATE:3/22/11 / CAD FILE: . - - PROT.MGR' - DRIFTER:eVi. - . • SIM NO - . • . . CO RU - • to - rThE----- 11--;sr l.0 CONSTRUCTION . • . . _ - _ _ -,2 5' . - _ - NOT FOR ._ . ' . . . _ . . _ . , _ . - . - . • • .. • B GRAPHIC SCALEa i, • ssmv . crt*f-1 I bzo -. wee a II'« INSTALL 1 162'METER c.R.c[ gW "\•,,''\\•\ / ass to4 INO LANDSCAPE SERNCE `\\\�\ �6,0 ot6 -'"/ ° of � ..a MT �� Y N69'A22 (If DPEw . > =� I L 22.85 / rr^^ to$ R . 2/76 vl D:0.,,�4 • 157 j �R,x, n 5 c SmDcn6x FIRE EINE WE n.el / i .., 8.,,,, / _ - .CC1'u+ ,SS C.O. TO'BE DETERMINED I C`// • V Z �� ' I CB b]] 12.50�\ CB )¢9) « F TE.26.5.�; TE-zT.zD• G T .. .)¢]D m ROOF LINE z6 al \\ 2T.10 [ p l5 C 2 LS weooA A /I g« 1-11 "Ls \ 27.51 y> °m 799 $■tea 03 53 'illi/_112.SO .. 13 u rvrrtxDD`cx-) jrri ., al 22.60° Jy OGiIYlED AS.ARE 2'E. IIIII. no Dx , ®TNT OF f � 6a .�, r FLEVA1AMS.z'M OF coke •Jfi 1O ��S j I. .eb°) `�xanm_� '�� EEEvanoN= 6.w IIII ��111/ I➢Ilss� o 6[=zs: ..:,T. - �; I„o.ND EASEMENT Iry TITEE z> °ROOF FINE ,�•'/ 19 ° prx,:�t FOk STORM DRAIN PIPE TEs[DP of a Ir `� Q+nua /Pu-z6 i) K a „ iljO_sc. erailLit Af 6;-,. .,., - Ar,21,1'4' •)b,D DrvD DDiIEx 1.. P...8. " '• Z oe 62 9'¢ 5 �D6 55 yy __.� ns(sonar [[D) 9 • D. ea }-_—. �• OJ(s esu zi[s�6D7 114 so' ssz] % SS • d[ 9Lh' U"1/61 OCT • \ \ ten ::.�.¢ / • / I m 8DC «BM • ' I'=m' 5/2e/97 • 97158 • so .�., 1 « 1 U:\9T,56\XiT.O • 172305 9069 j 172305 9136 1 182305 9046 Josephine Grassi Mary Louise&Paglia Ro Clare 1 Boon&Chieko Chaya PO Box 1188 1818 Jones Ave NE 4567 135th P1 SE Renton,WA 98057 ' Renton,WA 98056 Bellevue,WA 98006 . 7 182305 9046 182305 9051 182305 9056 Boon&Chieko Chaya CITY OF RENTON Land&Timber Compan Cugini 4567 135th P1 SE 200 Mill Ave S , PO Box 359 Bellevue,WA 98006 Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98057 2 1 f 182305 9056 182305 9060 182305 9061 Land&Timber Compan Cugini Stephen&Abby Chick CCS\RENTON HOUSING LIMITED P PO Box 359 618 Smithers Ave S NO STREET NAME or NUMBER Renton,WA 98057 Renton,WA 98055 ,WA 1 i JI % 182305 9066 182305 9068 182305 9075 Josephine Est Cugini Land&Timber Compan Cugini Monica Silva PO Box 359 PO Box 359 ; 601 Burnett Ave S Renton,WA 98057 Renton,WA 98057 Renton,WA 98055 2 <1 1 ,- 182305 9075 182305 9086 I, 182305 9091 Monica Silva Darrell Knoll William&Susan Swinhart 601 Burnett Ave S 611 S 6th St , i 621 Burnett Ave S Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 i_ Renton,WA 98055 1 I , 182305 9115 182305 9119 , i 182305 9127 B E&L INVESTMENTS LLC j Edward&Rhonda Perkins . I Elizabeth Fugiel 4733 81st P1 SW 19225 SW 46th Ave 619 Burnett Ave S Mukilteo,WA 98275 ! Tualatin,OR 97062 Renton,WA 98055 I i 182305 9202 192305 9024 192305 9025 Bobby Taylor Bros Rev Trst Castagno Bros Revo Castagno 14300 SE 176th St 180 Front St S 180 Front St S Renton,WA 98058 Issaquah,WA 98027 Issaquah,WA 98027 "\ 192305 9025 192305 9025 192305 9070 Bros Revo Castagno Bros Revo Castagno ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY 180 Front St S I 180 Front St S PO Box 2485 Issaquah,WA 98027 Issaquah,WA 98027 Los Angeles,CA 90051 192305 9092 296390 0005 I 296390 0010 RENTON FUEL COMPANY LLC Ethelyn Runions Paul Blakey III NO STREET NAME or NUMBER 600 Morris Ave S 604 Morris Ave S WA Renton,WA 98055 j Renton,WA 98055 ( I `N I . 7I 296390 0010 296390 0020 296390 0025 Paul Blakey III Kenneth Armitage Evelyn Anderson 604 Morris Ave S I 612 Morris Ave S 616 Morris Ave S Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 I i 296390 0030 296390 0035 296390 0040 ' Viola Hall Gregory Sweet Ann Laurent 620 Morris Ave S 622 Morris Ave S 628 Morris Ave S Renton,WA 98055 , Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 , l 296390 0045 ' 296390 0050 ; I 296390 0055 Ross Gonedridge Kim Frazier Daniel&Maria Nelson 2311 Capitol Way S 642 Morris Ave S 633 Smithers Ave S Olympia,WA 98501 Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 296390 0065 296390 0070 296390 0070 Daniel Holman Jr. Kelly Tumelson Kelly Tumelson 627 Smithers Ave S 13115 12th Ave S 13115 12th Ave S Renton,WA 98055 Seattle,WA 98168 Seattle,WA 98168 J ; _ ) i ` I 296390 0075 i ' 296390 0080 j 296390 0085 i Marin Lundquist Henry Huynh j Devin Reed ' 621 Smithers Ave S 619 Smithers Ave S 1632 Index Ave SE Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 ! Renton,WA 98058 - ii N I % 296390 0090 296390 0100 783930 0055 Herbert Frei Hy-Lo-Ro Agnes Clark 611-611 1/2 Smithers Ave S 530 Wells Ave S 536 Smithers Ave S Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 783930 0060 783930 0065 783930 0070 Frank William Kelleman j , John Baicy Lillian Fornelia 540 Smithers Ave S 3012 231st Ln SE#N108 531 Burnett Ave S Renton,WA 98055 Issaquah,WA 98029 Renton,WA 98055 i 784030 0110 915460 0005 ), 915460 0170 Weldon Thompson RENTON FUEL COMPANY LLC RENTON FUEL COMPANY LLC 528 Rainier Ave S#36 NO STREET NAME or NUMBER NO STREET NAME or NUMBER Renton,WA 98055 ,WA ,WA 942350 0005 . EIGHTY FOUR ASSOCIATES LTD 2150 N 107th St#370 Seattle,WA 98133 ' . i j . I I i a ' a • • 5A--93-070 Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055-2189 BILL OF SALE,abovfieitil p " Property Tax Parcel Number. M Project File 1:v.,„x334 Street In d - Q r t;.l l 5. Reference Number(')of Documents assigned or released:Additional reference numbers ore on page (X) Grsntor(s • �,�1�� p� N��1 Grantee(s): 1.( �t✓4 � ` ` _ I' U 1. City of Renton,a Municipal Corporation ' N 2..14�.23 gel L 4). S #t if 98( grants,liar sells and delivers to 0 ~The Grantor,as named above,for,and in consideration of mutual benefits,hereby g • C) the Grantee,as named above,the following described personal property: C' rWATER SYSTEM: + M' 3 L.F.of _a. • 6r Water Main O L.F.of 0.A1 " _____ Water Main G� L.F_of .8" " Water Main Cr) `at each of 45" _ " Gate V each of " Gate valves N. each of Fie Hydrant Assemblies SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: Bo L.P.of t . Me,. Sewer Maus L.F.of " Sewer Main - L.F.of Sewer Main each of " Diameter Manholes each of " Diameter Manholes each of " Diameter Manholes o STORM DRAINA GE SYSTEM: LO +h EN iXil L.F.of " Stone Line a; L.F.of '� Storm Line ' L.F.of " Storm Line each of " Storm Inlet/Outlet _ _„ each of " Storm Catch Bain " each of " Manhole o o STREET IMPROVEMENTS: (Including Curb,Gutter.Sidewalk.Asphalt Pavement) Curb,Cutter,Mim ( -F. Sit7e to-t4 IC o 118 G 41 g. Asphalt PavementSY or L.F.of- Width STREET LIGHTING: rI of Poles " By this conveyance.Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Omuta against all and every person or persons,whomsoever,lawtttlly claiming'or to claim the setae. This conveyance shall bind the heirs,executors, adatinia and assigns forever.- #4g-00 li:WILLBYMMVAH DOUTBIL SALLDOC.MAH Ms 1 o c 'Ia. I c u- ti 4 O C . • • I _ Form 1N S OF,I have e unto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. sa oaot/,n 146. P g-v•cd( • _L,J19,s,-, .1-/ 4(YAri M6, INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his'her/their free and voluntary act for.thc uses and purposes mentioned in thb insuutnent • Notary public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: — Dated: ,Lt, ;;1 REPRESENTATIVE FORM OFACXNOWLEDG E CZ Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS O i COUNTY OF KING ) Of t I certify that ow or have satisfactory evidence that f pkyz_ - PUe ed6 signed th stated that he/she/they was/were tho ' . B instrument,on oath (C Y to xecute the instrument and ackn wl e 1' as the Vr d� /ID. : l7- and of,a/Zj OZ42u7144t ( e.free and voluntary act of such party/parties fo th us and urpbses mentioned in the instrument. `� a.1;,. Notary -' u to in and r the S e of,Washington Notary(Print) ��A--) My appoint men eac ire /�v s:� /0/2CXo7 Dated: Q(' ) 44 j- .CORPORATE FORM O ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss CO F G On this/ day of - t 9qf',before me personally appeared tie. I P/,ul1 to me known to be Vdte. 1 ' of the corporation that executed the within i and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and o ' corporation,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stat t he/she was authorized to execute said instrument that the seal affixed is th rporatc seal of said corporation. Notary public in and for the State of Washin on Notary(Print), Adv CITIclIWOF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Jesse Tanner,Mayor July 23, 1997 - • Ms. Stephanie Durman Catholic Community Services of Western Washington 100-23rd Avenue South Seattle,WA 98144 SUBJECT: Burnett Avenue Family Housing Project No. LUA-97-070,ECF,SA Dear Ms. Durman: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Deten iination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must ,comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures and Conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 277-5586. For the Environmental Review Committee, 0141‘, Mark R. P ,AICP Project ager FINAL.DOC I 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 WAi Washington State Northwest Region Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North Sid Morrison P.O. Box 330310 Secretary of Transportation Seattle,WA 98133-9710 (206)440-4000 fierl DATE: July 11, 1997 ; kr , 7997 TO: Mark Pywell "JEvE.z. �I. City of Renton, Project Manager 'YOFREAi oNNIN 200 Mill Avenue South Renton WA 98055 Subject: SR 515 MP 7.21 CS 1741 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance-Burnett Avenue Family Housing-Variance to construct six unit of housing C 4-tTY\44.&-- File No.LUA-97-0 ,ECF,SA FROM: Robert A. Josephson, E,'Manager of Planning &Local Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North, MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review the project, which is located at 633 Burnett Avenue North. Our response is below: We have reviewed the subject document and have no further comments. The project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. If you have any questions, please contact Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section VEE:vee File Name • • • ......... „ CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAKINGoiiiinsomosiiiiiiiiiinimmoirmingaiminini. • On the day of -\ ti , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing TZLporlic 4 De.c.iEj documents. This information was sent to: • Name Representing G.F _12x,cfy-oU A-1-1\A carik- • • (Signature of Sender) SR/VIA/4 jakk4VY1- • • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 641\10i .3.-A-G/‹..c0A/ -signed-this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the psirposes mentioned in the.instrument. • A Dated: (01, .60 &e_gd th-Notary Public in d for state of Was gtpra • Notary.(Print) MAR ARET J: F5t1CLAR t`‘. My appointment exeaamisweikaaiwiEskirotp_ Project-Name: • .e(44(t4 )i(5/V2s1Ifn Project Number: 1AA.A 0-10 , 5,41 ,V , OUP NOTARY.DOC • • >D .... :,: ,..F ,:« .,_.CE'8 ::`::;:.,<:;;;>;:::.`:'.;:>>`<>><°<<>`> » « < '< > «<>< ' ' DA O S RVI Y.MA On the X1171 day of G -e.2 , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing 1;g-L I-:4-P,tim:har-fins. • documents. This information was sent to: • Name • Representing Department of Ecology Dick Anderson Department of Transportation KC Water Pollution Control Metro Department of Wildlife • Larry Fisher Department of Fisheries David Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Sue Rumery City of Seattle Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom, Fisheries Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Rita Perstac Puget Power (Signature of Sender) SlevLtU- . • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) satisfactory 5AA/b y G KSCJ!mil I certifythat I know or have evidence that ��� � , signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for .the' uses-and, purposes mentioned in the instrument. �� ' • Dated: (o D-(v/9 1 �ti� l Notary Public. nd for th ate of Wasb gi'op •.. • Notary (Print) MARGARET J. P1tLAR " - • . My appointment ex • • Project Name: 1 wvr 2.fl Ay-c-. ry i 11V � ltislc2�1 Project Number: ' �J 0/t/a-o1'I '0/0 ,SA,\/,- F • NOTARY.DOC " CITY )F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor ' Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 25, 1997 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 • Olympia,WA 98504-7703 • • Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on June 24, 1997: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED BURNETT AVENUE FAMILY HOUSING LUA-97-070,ECF,SA The applicant seeks environmental review, an Administrative Site Plan, and a Variance in order to construct six units of affordable housing. The variance,if approved,will allow the applicant to exceed the lot coverage limitation established by the Residential Multi-Family-Urban Center(RM- U)Zone. Location: 633 Burnett Avenue ort ., " Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM July 14, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments.After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is'not sufficient evidence to"amend its original determination,then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680]and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM July 14, 1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055.:.Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. If you have questions, please call me at(425)277-5586. For the Environmental Review Committee, Mark R. Pywe , P " Project M er • cc: King County Water Pollution Control Division,Metro Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Sue Rumery, City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries,Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) • Rita Perstac, Puget Power AGNCYI.TR nne\ 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer . • REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION DECISION DATE: June 24, 1997 Project Name: Burnett Avenue Family Housing Applicant: Catholic Community Services/Renton Housing Limited Partnership Owner: CCS/Renton Housing Limited Partnership File Number: LUA-097-070,V,SA,ECF Project Manager: Mark R. Pywell, AICP Project Description: The applicant seeks environmental review, an Administrative Site Plan, and a Variance in order to construct six units of affordable housing. The variance, if approved, will allow the applicant to exceed the lot coverage limitation established by the Residential Multi-Family- Urban Center (RM - U) Zone. Project Location: 633 Burnett Avenue South Exist. Bldg. Area SF: N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: 6,352.5 SF (2,117.5 SF Footprint) Site Area: 7 — 1;381-SF Total Building Area SF: 6,352.5 SF a ArcarfY: O Iy �V 47 y �. / • P®RKING ARCA ♦ � �No ::e =ii:ia/i cn •NAwaxi^ f�N//1 , a^rJcuutL rcn /e-10 ^aK yf •Id FRe cw a Yci N 1 ro/b e c N^NcwiNe/ ey Iz lz N •- /�/i� 1P] r // / •111. - 1. i • a r�z..�rwe• w b 1 1 s,......wd.,,�r.y a-v uu♦mow.u..«.a.0 z c. , _...S.. 7th ST._ „�` 1e LANDSCAPE PLAN - - J -- "A'-6 ve• 1 0 Project Location Map - - - ADMNSIT.DOC City ofRenton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&Et ;mental Review Committee Staff Report ' BURNETT AVE. FAMILY HOUSING LUA-97-070,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 24,1997 Page 2 of 15 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant seeks environmental review, an administrative site plan, and a variance in order to construct a three story, six unit, apartment complex. The apartment complex will house low to moderate income families. The applicant has received approval of a modification to the parking standards in order to provide fewer parking stalls than would normally be required by Code. The variance will allow the applicant to cover 83% of the project site with impervious materials. The Municipal Code development standards limits impervious surface areas to 75% of a project site. The proposed project could be reduced from six units to five units and still meet the minimum density requirement for this zone. A five unit complex would be allowed with nine parking stalls (5 x 1.75 = 8.75 or 9 parking stalls). Although the project would then meet the parking requirements it would not resolve the issues of the amount of impervious area created by the project or the setbacks for the proposed building. The footprint of the building and the associated impervious area would remain the same. The only difference would be that the third floor would contain only one unit and not two units. It would also reduce the density of the project down closer to the minimum density for the zone, away from the goal density of the zone. City staff does not recommend a reduction in the number of units on the project site. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: (1) Earth Impacts: The project site is covered by grass and weeds with a couple of trees located near the 7th Street end of the project site. The vegetation will need to be removed as part of the grading of the project site. The only other grading would include the removal of unsuitable building material from under the foundation area and the backfilling of this area with appropriate soils that will support the proposed building. The actual amount of excavation and fill have not been calculated at this time but soil sampling analysis indicates that it will not require a significant amount of excavation and backfilling. ADMNSIT.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&E, ,mental Review Committee Staff Report BURNETTAVE. FAMILY HOUSING LUA-97-070,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JUNE 24,1997 Page 3 of 15 Due to the high water table this area of the City is potentially subject to liquefaction in a strong earthquake. This potential will be mitigated by replacing the existing soils with structural fill and by the design of the floor slab. As required by Code, other methods to further mitigate the potential for liquefaction will be required as necessary during the building permit review. The applicant will be installing temporary erosion control measures that will be maintained throughout the construction phase of the project. These measures will include silt fences and wetting of the ground and debris as necessary to prevent dust. Dirt that is tracked out onto the street will be removed before it can become a nuisance to the neighbors. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is required. Policy Nexus: N/A (2) Air Impacts: Potential averse air quality impacts would include the exhaust from construction vehicles, dust during the construction phase of the project, and vehicles accessing the site after the apartment complex is rented. As noted above, the dust from construction activities will be mitigated by the erosion control methods proposed by the'applicant.. Exhaust from vehicles and construction equipment is already regulated by state and federal agencies. The applicant is proposing to provide all electric appliances in the apartments including the heating source for the units within the building. These applicants will not cause any direct impacts to the air quality. • Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required. Policy Nexus: N/A (3) Water Impacts:The Geotechnic Report prepared by Geoengineers notes that the water table is within three to three and a half feet of the surface of the ground. The high ground water has forced the applicant to request approval to use surface parking as opposed to underground parking. The expense of creating and maintaining a waterproof underground parking structure would be infeasible for an apartment complex of this size. The applicant will be connecting the on-site storm water collection system into the existing City storm water system in the street. The proposed project does not create enough impervious area subject to vehicle travel to require the installation of a storm water quality system such as a biofiltration swale. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is required. Policy Nexus: N/A ADMNSIT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Ei mental Review Committee Staff Report BURNETTAVE FAMILY HOUSING LUA-97-070,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JUNE 24,1997 Page 4 of 15 (4) Police and Fire Prevention Impacts: Police Department staff have noted that they have sufficient resources to maintain the current level of service in this area. Fire Prevention Bureau staff note that the proposed project is subject to the Fire Mitigation Fee of $2328. The applicant will need to provide all Code-required improvements. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall provide a Fire Mitigation Fee of$388 per unit (6 units x $388 = $2328.00) prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. Policy Nexus: Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution, Environmental Ordinance (5) Transportation Impacts: The project site will have access from Smithers Ave. South and from Burnett Ave. South. Most traffic will enter from Smithers Ave. South and exit from Burnett Ave. South due to the layout of the parking lot. The applicant will need to provide a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 per average daily trip in and out of the site. It is estimated that the proposed project will generate 29.27 average daily trips. The fee is estimated at $2,195.25. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall provide a Transportation Mitigation Fee of $75.00 per new daily trip in and out of the site prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. Policy Nexus: Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution, Environmental Ordinance (6) Parks and Recreation Impacts: The proposed project will add six more apartment units to the housing supply in the City of Renton. These new residents will make use of the existing parks and recreation system within the City of Renton. The applicant will need to submit a Parks Mitigation Fee of $354.51 per unit. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall submit a Parks Mitigation Fee of$354.51 per unit (6 units x$354.51 = $2127.06). Policy Nexus: Parks Mitigation Fee Resolution, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) ADMNSIT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Er, :mental Review Committee Staff Report • BURNETTAVE FAMILY HOUSING LUA-97-070,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 24,1997 Page 5 of 15 B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. XX Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment and Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment and Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Appeal Period. Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per Average Additional Daily Trip. At 6.47 trips per unit, in accordance with the ITE Manual, each living unit shall be charged a fee of$485.25, for a total fee of$2,911.50, payable with the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall provide a Fire Mitigation Fee of$388 per unit (6 units x$388 = $2328.00) prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. 3. The applicant shall submit a Parks Mitigation fee of$354.51 per new residential unit within the project (6 units x$35,4.41 = $2126.46) prior to the issuance of building permits. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General Notes 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. Construction Services 2. The ADA accessibility will need to be shown on the Building Permit application plans. 3. The type of construction will need to be clearly identified on the Building Permit application plans. Transportation 4. Street improvements will be required to meet current City Codes/Standards. New concrete sidewalk located in (easement) on South 7th Street frontage of the site will be required. Wastewater Utility 5. Side sewer permit at$80 per connection will be required. Sanitary sewer(SDC) fees of$350 per multi-family unit will be required. ADMNSIT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval& mental Review Committee Staff Report BURNETT AVE. FAMILY HOUSING LUA-97-070,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JUNE 24,1997 Page 6 of 15 Notes continued. Surface Water Utility 6. Surface water(SDC) fees of$0.129 per square foot of new impervious area on-site (not less than $385) will be required. Water Utility 7. The existing 4"water main located in Smithers Ave. South will require replacement with a new 8"water main.from South 7th Street North to the site's north property line (approximately 77 linear feet). Water (SDC) fees of$510 per multi-family unit will be required. Fire Department 8. The required preliminary fire flow is 1500 GPM. Two fire hydrants are required, one within 150 feet of the structure and one within 300 feet of the structure. 9. A fire sprinkler system is required by City Ordinance.. Separate plans and permits from the Fire Department are required. 10. The sprinkler system shall be monitored by an approved central station fire alarm system. Separate plans and permits are required. 11. A second exit may be required for the third floor units. Community Services Department 12. All landscape improvements are to be maintained by land owner, including those outside of the property. PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT & DECISION This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action XX Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. A1.0, Site Plan (Received May 30, 1997). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. A2.0, Building Floor Plan & Elevations (Received May 30, 1997). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. 1 of 1, Conceptual Utility Plan (Received , 1997). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. L1.0, Landscape Plan (Received May 30, 1997). ADMNSIT.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&Er ,mental Review Committee Staff Report BURNETTAVE. FAMILY HOUSING LUA-97-070,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 24,1997 Page 7 of 15 C. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the Site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-31- 33(D) of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: 1. Conformance with the comprehensive plan, its elements and policies; The site is designated Center Downtown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Map. The intent of the designation is to "create a balance of land uses that contribute to the revitalization of downtown Renton". The proposed project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in that multi-family residential development is appropriate within the downtown designation. Policy DT-1. There should be a mix of uses, including retail, office, light industrial, and residential that generate the demand for goods and services. The proposed project will provide the residential portion of the proposed mix of uses for this area. Policy DT-3. Development and redevelopment of Center Downtown should strive for urban density and intensity of land uses. The proposed project provides a density of 35 units to the acre. This is consistent with the goal of a density between 25 and 100 dwelling units per acre in the downtown area. Policy DT-8. Development in the Center Downtown designation should conform to the Downtown Renton Association's Vision. "The Downtown Renton Association's vision is to achieve a mix of uses in downtown to include residential, commercial, light industrial, retail, public services, entertainment, recreation and youth activities. Residential units would be available in a wide variety of types from single family homes, townhouses and high density apartments. They would be located in both the downtown and adjacent neighborhoods, and at prices that will accommodate everyone from subsidized low income people to up-scale professional."(Renton in the Future:A Vision) The proposed project will provide a high density residential project that is designed for use by low to moderate income families. Policy H-50. Achieve the targets of 20% of new construction for low income housing as defined in Countywide policies. The proposed project will add six new units of low to moderate income housing within the City of Renton. This will help the City to attain the target established within the Countywide policies. Policy H-57. Disperse affordable housing in all areas of the City and avoid concentrations of housing projects. The proposed project is an infill project within an existing neighborhood. This will be the only project of this type within the immediate area and will avoid concentrating affordable housing in one area of the City. 2. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The project site is designated as Residential Multi-Family - Urban (RM-U) Zone. This zone allows for the construction of multi-family apartment buildings at a density range of 25 to 100 units per acre. The proposed project has a density of 35 dwelling units per acre. ADMNSIT.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&El mental Review Committee Staff Report BURNETT AVE FAMILY HOUSING LUA-97-070,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 24,1997 Page 8 of 15 Although the project complies with some of the existing land use regulations, the applicant is requesting approval of modifications to various development standards either through the site plan review process or by special request. The Parking and Loading Ordinance establishes the number of parking stalls required for each land use. Multi-family residential development.requires 1.5 parking spaces per unit, plus one guest parking stall per four units. For a six unit apartment complex, the applicant would need to provide 11 parking stalls. Due to the size and shape of the existing parcel of land, the applicant is only able to provide nine parking stalls. The applicant requested and received a modification to the Parking and Loading Ordinance for nine parking stalls. This modification was granted as the apartment complex will be for rent by low to moderate income families that tend to have fewer vehicles than average to high income families. The applicant has a site that is adjacent to roadways on three sides. The front yard and rear yard are adjacent to Smithers Ave. and Burnett Ave. respectively. Multi-family development in the urban area is supposed to provide a minimum front and rear yard setback of five feet. However, the Code allow for the setback to be reduced to zero feet provided that the applicant provides an amenity such as balconies. The applicant is providing private balconies for each of the units and requesting that the zero foot front and rear setback be approved. The applicant is providing an eleven foot setback from the South 7th Street frontage that is in'accordance with the Municipal Code. The building will be located approximately 39 feet from the only interior lot line. Most of this area will be .used for driveway, parking and landscaping. 3. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The applicant has submitted a landscape plan for the proposed project. Originally the applicant tried to fit ten parking stalls on-site in order to come as close to the eleven parking stalls required by Code. In reviewing the plans staff recommended to the applicant that parking stall number ten be eliminated as cars backing out of the stall would pose a danger to vehicles in Burnett Ave. S. and to pedestrians. The applicant agreed with this assessment and amended their request to a modification to the Parking and Loading Ordinance. This area will be landscaped and this will improve the appearance of the site from the surrounding properties. Cars will be parked along the interior property line of the subject property. In order to minimize the impact on the adjacent property staff recommend that the applicant be required to construct a minimum of a four-foot tall fence along the interior property line to buffer the view of the automobiles in this area. The fence would need to stop prior to the Burnett Ave. right-of-way in order to preserve the site distance of vehicles leaving the site via Burnett Ave. 4. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; The applicant is working with a very small site for the proposed project. To the extent possible the applicant is landscaping the areas that are not covered by buildings or impervious surfaces. Storm water will exit the site and be directed into the existing storm water system under the adjacent streets. 5. Conservation of area-wide property values; The proposed project will develop a site that is currently vacant. The proposed development will help to conserve area-wide property values, whereas a vacant site often collects debris and detracts from adjacent property values. ADMNSIT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Er' mental Review Committee Staff Report BURNETT AVE. FAMILY HOUSING LUA-97-070,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 24,1997 Page 9 of 15 6. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; The proposed project, with the deletion of parking stall ten, provides for a safe and efficient movement of vehicles on the property. Pedestrian leaving the building will have separate walkway that connects into the City sidewalk system. 7. Provision of adequate light and air; The building is well setback from other structures in the surrounding area. Natural light will be able to reach all sides of the proposed structure and air movement will not be hindered by the proposed building. 8. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; The proposed development should not create or be subject to significant noise levels or other harmful or unhealthy conditions. Construction noise will,be of a limited duration and will be limited to the hours between 7:30 AM and 6:00 PM according to the Construction Mitigation plan submitted by the applicant. 9. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and Adequate public services are available. The applicant will need to provide the Code- required extension and improvements. 10. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The development and maintenance of the subject property will assist in preventing neighborhood deterioration and blight. D. Consistency with Variance Criteria The applicant seeks an Administrative Variance from the RM-U zone Development Standards, Section 4-31- 8(D)(9) of the Renton Municipal Code. This Section limits lot coverage (building footprint, sidewalks, and driveways) to a maximum of 75% of the lot area. The applicant is requesting a variance to exceed the lot coverage by approximately 590 sf for a lot coverage of approximately 83%. City Code 4-722, G-3: The Development Services Director shall have authority to grant an administrative variance upon making a determination, in writing, that the conditions specified below have been found to exist: 1. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: The applicant is working with a small lot (7,381 sf) that is zoned RM-U. This zone requires a minimum density of 25 dwelling units per acre with a maximum of 100 dwelling units per acre. The minimum density would require 5 dwelling units to be constructed on this property. If the applicant was to reduce the project from six to five units it would not change the size of the building foot print nor would it reduce the paving required for parking area or sidewalks. The ability to reduce the amount of impervious area on the surface of this lot is further limited by the high groundwater table in this area. The high groundwater, 3 to 3.5 feet below the surface, makes an underground garage infeasible on this site. The only other option would be to require the parking to be located under the first floor of the building. This would raise the building by one additional story, on this site the applicant needs three stories of living units in order to meet density requirements. This would require the applicant to construct what in size and bulk would appear to be a four story building in an area of one and two story buildings and homes. ADMNSIT.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval& ;:mental Review Committee Staff Report BURNETT AVE FAMILY HOUSING LUA-97-070,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 24,1997 Page 10 of 15 2. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity. The applicant will have landscaped areas on the subject property that will buffer the appearance of the proposed development. 3. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: The granting of the variance would not constitute a grant of special privilege. The need for the variance is driven by the density requirement of the zoning designation that was applied to the project site the City and by the unique features of the lot (small size and high groundwater•table). 4. That the approval as determined by the Director is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose: The applicant feels that the variance requested is the minimum variance that will allow them to develop this property. It appears that the applicant could reduce:the:amount of impervious area by landscaping the area of the parking lot to the wheel stops. The applicant could also create two of the parking stalls as compact parking stalls. This would further reduce the amount of impervious area on this site. Further Considerations Only one phone call in opposition to this project has been received. The caller indicated that he was in opposition to this variance because he had not been allowed to build a garage within six feet of his alley. XX Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. D. Findings, Conclusions & Decision Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The Applicant has requested Environmental Review, Administrative Site Plan Approval, and an Administrative Variance for a six unit apartment building for low to moderate income families. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 thru 5. ADMNSIT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Er ,mental Review Committee Staff Report " BURNETTAVE. FAMILY HOUSING LUA-97-070,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 24,1997 Page 11 of 15 4) Variance : The applicant's variance request complies with the requirements for information for a variance request. The applicant's justification for the variance are included in the project file. 5) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Center Downtown. 6) Zoning: The Conditional Use as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the RM-U Zoning designation. 7) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Single & . multi-family residential; East: Single and multi-family residential; South: commercial and West: Single and multi-family residential. E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Center Downtown; and the Zoning designation of RM-U. F. Administrative Variance Decision The Administrative Variance for Burnett Ave. Family Housing, File No. LUA-97-070,V, is approved. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON THE VARIANCE: June 27, 1997 SIGNATURES: 0 J tires C.Hanson, Development Services, Director date G. Administrative Site Plan Decision The Administrative Site Plan for Burnett Ave. Family Housing, File No. LUA-97-070,SA, is approved subject to the following conditions. ADMNSIT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&En, mental Review Committee Staff Report BURNETT AVE. FAMILY HOUSING LUA-97-070,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JUNE 24,1997 Page 12 of 15 CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan and landscape plan that demonstrates a parking layout in accordance with the Code-requirements as modified by the Planning/Building/Public Works Director. The revised site plan shall be submitted with the application for building permits. 2. The applicant shall construct a wood fence along the north property line in a manner so that the fence does not block the visibility of cars entering and leaving the site. 3. The applicant shall landscape to the wheel stops, allowing the leading edge of vehicles to overhang a landscape area instead of a paved area. To further reduce the impervious area, the applicant shall also make the easterly two parking stalls compact parking stalls. These changes shall be noted on the landscape plan required by Condition #1. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: June 27, 1997 ADMNSIT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&E mental Review Committee Staff Report BURNETT AVE. FAMILY HOUSING LUA-97-070,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 24,1997 Page 13 of 15 SIGNATURES: " �� �P���6= n a(� ?7 Jame /C. anon, Zoning Administrator date Micha I D. Katterm nn,Zoning A ministrator date ADMNSIT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Er ,:mental Review Committee Staff Report BURNETTAVE. FAMILY HOUSING LUA-97-070,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JUNE 24,1997 Page 14 of 15 TRANSMITTED this 27th day of June, 1997 to the applicant and owner: Stephanie Durman Catholic Community Services of Western Washington 100-23rd Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98144 TRANSMITTED this 27th day of June, 1997 to the parties of record: Scott Swinhart 621 Burnett Ave. S Renton, WA 98055 Herbert Frei 611 Smithers Ave. S • Renton, WA 98055 Kathy Cugini Cugini Land and Timber P.O. Box 359 Renton, WA 98057 Monica Silva 601 Burnett Ave. S Renton, WA 98055 Rose Paglia 117 South Tobin Street Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED this 27th day of June, 1997 to the following: • Larry Meckling,Building Official Bob Arthur,Land Use Inspector Art Larson,Fire Marshal Neil Watts,Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney South County Journal ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL • Environmental Determination Comment Process Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM July 14, 1997 (15 days from the date of publication). Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or tile discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. ' Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor City of Renton Development Services Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 ADMNSIT.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&Et mental Review Committee Staff Report BURNETT AVE. FAMILY HOUSING LUA-97-070,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 24,1997 Page 15 of 15 • Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM July 14, 1997 (15 days from the date of publication). If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. ADMNSIT.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-070,ECF,SA APPLICANT: Catholic Community Services/Renton Housing Limited Partnership PROJECT NAME: Burnett Avenue Family Housing DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review, an Administrative Site Plan, and a Variance in order to construct six units of affordable housing. The variance, if approved, will allow the applicant to exceed the lot coverage limitation established by the Residential Multi-Family- Urban Center(RM - U) Zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 633 Burnett Avenue South LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM July 14, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM July 14, 1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. PUBLICATION DATE: June 30, 1997 DATE OF DECISION: June 24, 1997 SIGNATURES: 9/) �c /�/J����Q/���'��� 'C�z ,/ /q7 Gregg Zim C ma ,Ad►fiinistratbr DATE Department of anning/Building/Public Works -� Sa Chastain,Administrator DATE Community Service Department Lee heeler, Fire Chief DATE R n n Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES AND SITE PLAN CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-070,ECF,SA APPLICANT: Catholic Community Services/Renton Housing Limited Partnership PROJECT NAME: Burnett Avenue Family Housing DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review, an Administrative Site Plan, and a Variance in order to construct six units of affordable housing. The variance, if approved, will allow the applicant to exceed the lot coverage limitation established by the Residential Multi-Family- Urban Center(RM- U) Zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 633 Burnett Avenue South Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall submit Traffic Mitigation Fee f$75.00 per Average Additional Daily Trip. At 6.47 trips per unit, in accord e Manual, each living unit shall be charged a fee of$485.25, for a total fee f$2,911.50 ayable with the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall provideFire Mitigation Fee of$388 per unit(6 units x$388 2328 prior to the issuance of construction/5uilding permits. 3. The applicant shall submi a iti atio of$354.51 per new residential unit within the project(6 units x$354.41 2126.46 'or to the issuance of building permits. The Administrative Site Plan for Burnett Ave. Family Housing, File No. LUA-97-070,SA, is approved subject to the following conditions. CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan and landscape plan that demonstrates a parking layout in accordance with the Code-requirements as modified by the Planning/Building/Public Works Director. The revised site plan shall be submitted with the application for building permits. 2. The applicant shall construct a wood fence along the north property line in a manner so that the fence does not block the visibility of cars entering and leaving the site. 3. The applicant shall landscape to the wheel stops, allowing the leading edge of vehicles to overhang a landscape area instead of a paved area. To further reduce the impervious area, the applicant shall also make the easterly two parking stalls compact parking stalls. These changes shall be noted on the landscape plan required by Condition#1. I. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-070,ECF,SA APPLICANT: Catholic Community Services/Renton Housing Limited Partnership PROJECT NAME: Burnett Avenue Family Housing DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review, an Administrative Site Plan, and a Variance in order to construct six units of affordable housing. The variance, if approved, will allow the applicant to exceed the lot coverage limitation established by the Residential Multi-Family- Urban Center(RM- U) Zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 633 Burnett Avenue South Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General Notes 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. Construction Services 2. The ADA accessibility will need to be shown on the Building Permit application plans. 3. The type of construction will need to be clearly identified on the Building Permit application plans. Transportation 4. Street improvements will be required to meet current City Codes/Standards. New concrete sidewalk located in (easement) on South 7th Street frontage of the site will be required. Wastewater Utility 5. Side sewer permit at$80 per connection will be required. Sanitary sewer(SDC) fees of$350 per multi-family unit will be required. Surface Water Utility 6. Surface water(SDC)fees of$0.129 per square foot of new impervious area on-site (not less than $385)will be required. Water Utility 7. The existing 4"water main located in Smithers Ave. South will require replacement with a new 8"water main from South 7th Street North to the site's north property line (approximately 77 linear feet). Water(SDC)fees of$510 per multi-family unit will be required. Burnett Avenue Family Housing LUA-97-070,ECF,SA Advisory Notes(Continued) Page 2 Fire Department 8. The required preliminary fire flow is 1500 GPM. Two fire hydrants are required, one within 150 feet of the structure and one within 300 feet of the structure. 9. A fire sprinkler system is required by City.Ordinance. Separate plans and permits from the Fire Department are required. 10. The sprinkler system shall be monitored by an approved central station fire alarm system. Separate plans and permits are required. 11. A second exit may be required for the third floor units. Community Services Department 12. All landscape improvements are to be maintained by land owner, including those outside of the property. CITE' _..DF RENTON "��g. ?. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 25, 1997 Ms. Stephanie Durman Catholic Community Services 100-.23rd Avenue South Seattle,WA 98144 SUBJECT: Burnett Avenue Family Housing Project No. LUA-97-070,ECF,SA Dear Ms. Durman: 0 This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on June 24, 1997, decided that your project will be issued a Determination of Non-Significance. The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement.(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6-6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of'a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency: This information is available to the public on request. Comments regarding the environmental determination-must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM July 14, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review,Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could.not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with:. Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM July 14, 1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me (425)277-5586. For the Environmental Review Committee, . - G Mairk R. Pyw CP Project Ma er cc: Mr. Scott Swinhart; Mr. Herbert Frei; Ms.Kathy Cugini; Ms. Monica Silva; Ms. Rose Paglia • DNSLTR DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer 'rill — T i, ''' '. rak ,a "r ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION • PROJECT NAME: BURNETT AVENUE FAMILY HOUSING PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-070,ECF,SA The applicant seeks environmental review,an Administrative Site Plan,and a Variance in Order to construct six units of affordable housing. The variance,if approved,will allow the applicant to exceed the lot coverage limitation established by the Residential Multi-Family-Urban Center(RM-U)Zone. Location: 633 Burnett Avenue South. I THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. IXXX I YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON JULY 14, 1997 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM,JULY 14, 1997. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. ".I ,91 n :� ® u_ ®_:t IFF-1, Car n'f:7• „'h;:A.I'_- "i1JJ r1 _i I;»3rc;I , W�rrF-e in.f, r; pq3 0 s iii ,e • 1'q Z ° ©co l: :,�.1� �° J a� g ISE v r,,, • ; l,� _.:_:' G �6TH ST 0 ` ' o t(L 17 � i k ,I -- r�� � ' p% wu<xs COURT 5.G e ��.;''Q��- 6 QQ r!i1Tt , oAllian vE y`h• S GOYI• • • - Y Ot = 6• • in..•rnl 7/ i�7k—O_I I r . 1�`.\91�pv'Q a i I to FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION IPlease include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CERTIFICATION . . . l, Sq,VI4 "JACrAtSo , hereby certify that 3 copies'of the above document were poste by me in , conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on• j(kr/e 2/ lq°11 • Signed: ` 141, drV-, aI , Y1 . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that G- `1 ���6tt �l r„� signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free a /ur kail/cs illO bt-h�. uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ,���`,•e6_6.,0'• Dated: 6/a 7/q 7 ,1 ' r an .y Notary Pub• in and f e StalketM ihirriZori i • Notary (Pant) MARGARCT 1" PI'll My appointment expires: 8 HOTARY,OOC • • ',mod ..........111 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: BURNETT AVENUE FAMILY HOUSING PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-070,ECF,SA The applicant seeks environmental review, an Administrative Site Plan, and a Variance in order to construct six units of affordable housing. The variance, if approved,will allow the applicant to exceed the lot coverage limitation established by the Residential Multi-Family- Urban Center (RM - U) Zone. Location: 633 Bumett Avenue South. • THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. XXX YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON JULY 14, 1997 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM, JULY 94, 1997. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. .,- 1 .I :1E¢I ia1®N ,® i DI.J i .® 1 ® 1 191•;11 a1 n. • e t�- � Wi1!J © �_ 20-Z�, I'al 4 nn 69 4 Il �A 4I�a� IT � 1-t f5 10 .s. �. I i, n I ----- . H a. teL�.✓ ;S st -_® 6 i1 ©•)to 9 ,�. bs ® ®. :1-7 ��is g. pr®-A I9_Em• , ®h 16OJ I Igr _.I ,.� 7 j 1�®. ® •r I�,," . is ,:, Iip n.m , ESL},° .tie /'mu' (ki +ref=s Lro_ i-1 i�fl : 2 :24 1;17 d A .7ti E '� u tlH1I 9 16-m t, Lr'..® — t$ mil, ® B 8 IrI ' ® 10' I` ,li .I Ct �;°I! �T7 \•" --ICE ie. I .1 _i(:�-: +-f1?Figa °e I- - 5©�O.,ll'il 1 I u -."E:. ,,, N .1c„,,,I1 -.1-9- A 08- y $ :J la] ,. i2 'z1. ..::2', ,: i j 0 V):,M17. r�:,;,J a1__ ® 10 •n a 0 '.'i �.. i CE,1E0A, I , S s! . 6TH • ST - . U �_j3�fl�j!1J1 PL��J-/ (.0t B " .o� Iv, it_' i .1=J i ,' ,°^r • .� "" r:.n (QI� s 8,��I �il ; qlJ V`` s�'',' ___ •,A 5.411 l0 t tt �1 1 nn ' ;,,, ''WILLIAMS COURT 0 7 - -®--,40;.. 19 0• '11_,,,® 'E ACOND 70UNITS.•' a S1 '°,�O I. a �I s'. I- a �S 5 �i I 3 :, • ..0 na` 0.5S AC. � ., r,T L" 6 � p, 91•T Id ,v _ V. ' J• u ,. u.r2 ®n ' � / �I , �I_21 Ac-r�{ .--1�.7L-e, .,- �. —® B' _I3_ :_tom°" - ?• .,,.o,.° ' r., 1 r 5,! GOYI f IV ob1 Ac. a ;US ilal -Sr •;Igor R T,�t '° u.nr '66 c4` lcri,; U7 ru i 1a-k.;4Ir,a t: .r.., z,.., uJ, e.'If. ,.•„z .a: OLBA. ,.r a _= .r- 7TH- - - ST.—• � .—. � Y > • -,VAC 7rM •.AVC. l9 l a' ---- I .._. •„ ,u —' IL. . ii �I . 1,..\l.�l '�h:• A ,.ao,w ....° ..-z7 1. . . v .,•lo+mil' - t-J.:._., _ e t, '/1!tid 4i .(7 4 I.IO AL Y. 7 CASTAGNO O�tNC _ ••z0 •.� '-1-!1 e a Q m J E BANKER / lRI0 IL,0' 6 j I — < Ink. 12 I 1� es it :� I. 8 _ R\G 1 :, \ I_. 12 �� a f OK.4L/� o / . RApY... o,. �� I �� `�yr G r. 121 \ ... I. edsl • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION `':'.Please include the project NUMBER:When"calling'foYproperfile;adentification <: ;::;:: :. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Kristina Thompson, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 i NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION COMMITTEE a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legalRENTON,WASHINGTON newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months ETThe Environmental Review Committee • prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language C)has issued a Determination of Non- continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County project and Mitigated fory the Renton project under the authority of the Renton Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the Municipal Code. State of Washington for King County. BURNETT AVENUE FAMILY HOUSING LUA-97-070,ECF,SA The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County Environmental review, Administrative Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers Site Plan, and Variance. Location: 633 during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Burnett Avenue South. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The Burnett Ave. Family Housing- LUA-97-070, ECF, SA comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on July 14, 1997. Written i comments shall be forwarded to the as published on: 6/30/97 Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the pro- ' ject file and the mitigation measures The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$39.31 imposed by the City of Renton's Legal Number 3251 , Environmental Review Committee are 1 / available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, O Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235- �j \ 2550. Appeal procedures are available in -� �- the City Clerk's office,First Floor,Muni i ' egal C , South County Journal , Building. cipal Published in the South County Journal qr � June 30, 1997.3251 Subscribed and sworn before me on this q " day of , 19 _e_Z , ____tajli -A()' ---qQ-LIA-6/__ - ---- --- ------ ®�W\I•M. FFH�;�s� Notary Public of the State of Washington g ,,t,..0 N 4;,,•y01' residing in Renton /�� 'o`S SFr••- 0/ King County, Washington -ca NpTARy ,% 0Icn:ppUGL\c'p��s Ol• 9 F 0�:,`Oi� �I41F•c2 6 2� c�. ,``�\W Sys r r__ NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. BURNETT AVENUE FAMILY HOUSING LUA-97-070,ECF,SA Environmental review, Administrative Site Plan, and Variance. Location: 633 Burnett Avenue South. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on July 14, 1997. Written comments shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. Publication Date: June 30, 1997 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot - • :: L_� COPY CIT' - OF RENTON ti- soil =; Planning/Building/Public Works Department • Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 17, 1997 Stephanie Durman Housing Development Coordinator Catholic Community Services 100 23rd Ave. South Seattle,WA 98144-2302 SUBJECT: 633 BURNETT AVE. S. ,BURNETT AVE. FAMILY HOUSING REQUEST TO REDUCE ON-SITE PARKING SPACES FROM 10 TO 9. Dear Ms. Durman: I am in receipt of your June 12, 1997 letter in which you request a further reduction from 10 to 9 on-site parking spaces for the Burnett Ave. Family Housing project at 633 Burnett Ave. South. The Parking and Loading Ordinance calls for 11 on-site parking spaces for this development. On March 11, 1997 this office approved a deviation from standards to provide 10 parking spaces instead of the required 11 spaces (March 11 letter attached). Your June 12, 1997 letter (copy attached) requests a further reduction from 10 spaces down to 9. In your letter you state that the benefits of reducing the number of on-site parking.spaces to 9 include: 1) Prevent an unsafe condition from cars backing out onto the sidewalk and Burnett Avenue. 2) Prevent an unsafe condition for young children on the property with cars backing out from both sides of the driveway. 3) Allow you to improve the landscaping to make the project more attractive while also reducing your lot coverage. FINDINGS/DECISION: The site plan attached to the June 12 letter does confirm that the parking space labeled as space 10 is placed in an undesirable location. A car backing out of this location could indeed create unsafe 1 conditions on the sidewalk and Burnett Avenue, both for vehicles and pedestrians. It does not appear that a tenth parking space can be placed elsewhere on this tight site plan. Upon reconsideration,the request for a deviation from standards to provide fewer on-site parking spaces for the Burnett Avenue family Housing Project, specifically 9 spaces, is hereby approved, on condition that the area occupied by parking space 10 be landscaped in lieu of being paved. Sincerely, li Gregg Zi e an, Administrator cc: Mark_PyweII,-Dovelopment PlantTtng Document1 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 • :.� This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: June 13, 1997 TO: Gregg Zimmerman FROM: Mark R. Pywell SUBJECT: Burnett Avenue Family Housing LUA-97-070,SA,ECF,V The applicant seeks approval from the City of Renton to construct six apartment units on a small site located at 633 Burnett Ave. S. These apartment will be rented to low and moderate income families. When the City first discussed this project with the applicant, staff recommended that the applicant provide all of the parking required by Code because it was felt that at some future date the apartment could become rented to people of average or greater income and that the parking would be needed. The applicant applied for a modification to the parking standards and provided information that indicated that the low and moderate income families would not require all of the parking required by City Ordinance. A modification to allow ten parking stalls was approved. The applicant has provided a site plan with ten parking stalls. In reviewing the layout of the parking it has become clear to City staff that the tenth parking stall is unsafe and anesthetic. City staff should have supported a modification to nine parking stalls. The turning movement into the tenth parking stall would be against the flow of traffic from the other nine parking stalls and would also require the driver to back onto the sidewalk in order to leave the parking stall. The paving of this area would almost eliminate one of the green spaces on the subject property. Finally, the change of the paving area of the stall to green space will reduce the variance that the applicant needs for this project. This zone limits impervious paving to 75% of this site. As designed, the site plan covers 83% of the site with impervious area. By eliminating one parking stall, the applicant could reduce the impervious area from 83%to 80%. After reviewing the information described above, staff would recommend a change to the modification to the parking standards to allow the applicant to provide nine parking stalls instead of the ten parking stall noted in your letter dated March 11, 1997. I have discussed this information with Stephanie Durman of the Catholic Community Services and their architect. They agree that it would be a better project if they could reduce the parking from ten stalls to nine stalls. cc: H:\W W6ODOT MEMO.D011bh �`�ram, �JL� '3' CATHOLIC ' G I' N III `� �� 100 23rd Avenue South j COMMUNITY Seattle,WA 98144 2302 SERVICES Phone:(206)328-5696 of Western Washington Fax:(206)328-5699 June 12, 1997 Gregg Zimmerman,Administrator Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: 633 Burnett Ave. S. Dear Mr. Zimmerman: I am writing to request that you allow us to reduce the number of parking spaces proposed at 633 Burnett Avenue S. from ten to nine. If you recall from our previous work on this, we had added the tenth parking space adjacent to the building in order to more closely comply with the City parking requirements. We do not believe that this space is necessary for our residents because in our experience, low-income people have fewer cars than average. As you can see in the attached site plan, this parking space is somewhat awkward, and has some substantial disadvantages. Eliminating this space would accomplish the following: 1. Prevent an unsafe condition from cars backing out onto the sidewalk and Burnett Avenue. 2. Prevent an unsafe condition for young children on the property with cars backing out from both sides of the driveway. 3. Allow us to improve the landscaping to make the project more attractive while also reducing our lot coverage. I urge you to allow us to improve this project by approving this change. If you have any questions about this request,please call me at 328-5648. Sincerely, Step I ante Durman Housing Development Coordinator ,4 1 xP�, �, 1997 cc: Mark Pywell oE��topnA-0-r PLpi.41�'1�L Cl/OF Ret TON A United Way Agency Q r' Ec .��� � Y' DEVELOP ivlciv 1 pLANi�11NG CITY OF REr1T0N / ii29 ,�\ / \' IISE.g• ht EL— .329 • :: tfSM I— 25.8 \ \ I ma.WAY .\\ •" • 12`11°Y t N89'42'21-W 113.82' (115'+/-DEED) ._. ,.., c.,---;, y,,,, ____., ,_, •...„ , ,,,....„ /// , ,• --?•, • , •. / . , ...., ,.t , /105' • • / / / „../// ----//// ,•,. • , 4: 7 ,� ,,, 1 /.:„/ / m/2 3 / / • j/ / 5 // 6 / / /I,~� �/ 7 8 • I g UU OpYEWAT • • O L1 /t� // vc % • —PROPOSED NEW b MT ' �' . ...n. 1 ../ 17/i , . .• cst ec.;"/ If 4, .z- i.. v. / .• / .0-11.. ,6- .. 7(E)H ANTI ■ ). I, r— / / / ( Doc / (U 1 I / I —EAISTRIG TREE — 4V1 13 H ----ExISTWG TREE / r/ ;•.TO BE REt1OVED = * • •.TO BE RE11OvED A DEED EXCEPTION REC. / `` S89'42'21'E 55.98' • ii • . • • • • • / U9511130944&0 EXHIBIT / {/•��//+�� 8.,•,' YAP FOR ADDIT1 AL ROW 2y/ •FOR PROPOSED GHHENT / 6204'YEAS.(67.95'1EED) /' / • / .5 (E)P.S.P.&L POLE •/ :, / i p V / S 1th ST \.. . ?' 2T• ' y )1' _./ . .; • • • S 89'42 21" E SUDD 55D.35' MEAS. (55U.12' DEED)• / 114.99• ___ /S 89'45.36-E 36 25. _—____ (S 89'42'21"E SUM)) Tonkin / Hoyne / Lokan ARCHITECTURE&URBAN DESIGN Leslie Provenzano Tonkin Barry S.Hoyne Kim D.Lokan Mark Pywell, Senior Planner City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South e �9 Renton, WA 98055 ©FVECu�,� 97 c;yy �tv?-p. 11 June 1997 Dear Mark, Thank you for your suggestion of eliminating the tenth parking space from our proposed development at 633 Burnett Avenue South. I agree that the elimination of this parking space will greatly improve the quality of the site plan and result in less impervious surface coverage. With the removal of the tenth parking space, the landscaped area increases to 1531 square feet from 1248 square feet thereby reducing the impervious surface lot coverage to 79.3% from the previous 83%. I have enclosed two copies of a revised site plan and corresponding Project Data reflecting the elimination the tenth parking space. Please let me know if you need more copies or any other information. Sincerely, Susan Petrus cc: Stephanie Durman, CCS 204 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104 (206)624-7880 Fax 622-1766 "'''``""" CITY OF RENTON s `1 Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 11, 1997 Mr. Mike Moedritzer Tonkin/Hoyne/Lokan 204 First Avenue South Seattle, WA 98104 Subject: BURNETT AVENUE FAMILY REQUEST FOR A DEVIATION OF THE PARKING AND LOADING ORDINANCE STANDARDS Dear Mr. Moedritzer: I received and reviewed your revised February 3, 1997 request for consideration and approval for a deviation in the parking standards established in the City of Renton Parking and Loading code, as amended by Ordinance No. 4517. Reference made to the code in the following evaluation shall be taken to denote the City of Renton Parking and Loading Code. BACKGROUND A project has been proposed to develop multi-family housing at 633 Burnett Avenue South. The proponent has requested a deviation of the parking standards to allow less parking than is required by the Parking and Loading Ordinance. Section 4-14-8A1c. of the Parking and Loading Ordinance requires 1.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit and Section 4-14-8A1d. requires one guest parking space for every four dwelling units for a total of 1.75 spaces per dwelling unit. The proposed plan for this project would require 11 parking spaces. The proposal calls for 10 spaces, or 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit plus one space for visitor parking. The proposal therefore provides one less parking space than is required by the Parking and Loading Ordinance. SUMMARY OF REQUEST The proponent is requesting a deviation from the standards of the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to develop multi-family housing at the desired density. The proposed housing will be built for low income families. The proponent contends that low-income residents living in this type of project will not own as many cars and will have a higher rate of transit usage, therefore, there is less of a need for parking as compared to higher income apartment projects. The applicant has submitted anecdotal information based upon observations of other similar facilities to support this contention. • The proponent also indicates that the proposed project will be situated close to service oriented commercial uses that would promote pedestrian and bicycle use and that the projects will be well served by Metro. FINDINGS 1. Parking and Loading Section 4-14-1.C.1.a states: Approval for deviation from standards: Whenever there are practical difficulties in carrying out the provisions of this chapter, the Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator may grant in writing modifications to the standards for individual cases, provided that such modifications: Conforms to the intent and purpose of the Code; and can be shown to be justified and required for the use and the situation intended; and will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity; and will be made prior to detailed engineering and design. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ilk . r Barnett Avenue Family Housing Administrative Decision 3/11/97 Page 2 2. The proposed site plan is not able to accommodate the required parking. The proponent claims that the proposed project will have less of a demand for parking than higher income projects. 3. The proposed 6 unit housing project located on Burnett Avenue South would provide 1 less space than what is required by the Parking and Loading Ordinance. • 4. The request has been made prior to submittal of detailed engineering and design drawings. The conditions stated in the Code for approval for deviation.from standards have been met. DISCUSSION One of the important purposes of the Parking and Loading Ordinance is to require proposed development projects to provide sufficient on-site parking spaces so as not to create undue demands on a limited supply of street parking spaces. It is intended that projects be designed such that the criteria for on-site parking can be met. Options for meeting these criteria can include creative layout of parking stalls or adjustments in dwelling unit counts. Introduction of vehicles using street parking or other off-site parking options due to provision of insufficient on-site parking spaces can create adverse impacts to other property in the neighborhood and does not conform to the intent and purpose of the Code. The applicant has made modifications to the site plan that has yielded an additional parking on-site parking space, and has provided anecdotal information to support the contention that the lower income residents that will occupy this facility require fewer parking spaces than are required by typical residents of multi- family residences. It is the opinion of the reviewer that the revised site plan conforms to the intent and purpose of the Code, and will not create adverse impacts to other properties) in the vicinity. DECISION Upon reconsideration, the request for a deviation from standards to provide fewer on-site parking spaces for the revised Burnett Avenue Family Housing Project than is called for in the Parking and Loading Ordinance is hereby approved. The applicant should note that this project is in the RM-U zone. City Code 4-31-8.D.11 requires parking . to be provided in either underground parking or parking structures, unless through the site plan review process it is determined that due to environmental or physical site constraints, surface or under building parking should be allowed. Sincerely, Gregg Zimrri ,Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works h:div/DS/devpin/JH/Burnpkg cc: Mark Pywell/Development Planning DEV cLOPM ENpP jANNING June 16, 1997 1 B �g�� Mark Pywell Development Services Division c EIV 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mark Pywell, I recently received a"Notice of Proposed Environmental Application"from the City of Renton. The Project Name is: BURNETT AVENUE FAMILY HOUSING/LUS-97-070,SA,V,ECF This project proposes to construct and manage 6 units of affordable housing. I am concerned about more apartment units in this area. I personally feel there are enough apartments in this • housing area. I live in a neighborhood that has several homeowners with children and senior citizens. I, unfortunately, purchased my house on 601 Burnett Avenue South, without the knowledge that there are problems with the apartment complex directly across my street, Williams Court. Williams Court has several tenants that are very loud, hang out in large groups in the parking lot late at night, have visitors at all hours of the night, leave garbage(like mattresses, shopping carts etc.)on the grass, litter, play very loud music and a basic disrespect for property and others that live around them. I have expressed concern over some disturbances with the manager of this complex to no avail. I am also concerned about adequate parking, to which there isn't any right now. There are many small apartment complexes in this area and almost all of them are dirty, not kept up, falling apart and basically, make the neighborhood less desirable for new homeowners. Another aspect of this project that concerns me is that this corner is VERY busy. There is currently no stop light,just a stop sign. This corner is very busy and has a ton of traffic in the morning and afternoon during rush hour. I do not know if the City has considered this, but this corner continues to be a problem if you live in this neighborhood and should have a stop light there now. I am VERY concerned about what another apartment complex will do to this neighborhood. I would like to put on record that I am NOT in favor of this project and I request ANY information regarding this proposal to be sent to me at: 601 Burnett Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Thank you. Sincerely, Monica Silva IIMMIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIPFV ''11Fir- .,- .1111111.11111111 , • , 2901 , . •. , 3RD. =17' ,,,--- _ C----,,,,....0,... rali--_,* AVENUE [ r 't--- 1-/- , r, .4,;:ientc.-•-- --- ----a---..*---- iv /0. .j •/< 49p.,-, --------- * 4.---- */ SEATTLE WASHINGTON 99121 h- BUSINESS INTERIORS NORTHWEST 5156284 U.S.POSTAGE * * SEATTLE TACOMA BELLEVUE BELLINGHAM leArt 4.,.././ . - „ 2C0 /1-e4:6( a-ve . Se)c.4.44-4 • ,Y - City':_ Ienton Department of Planning/Building/PI; Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Awl-Jeri' COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 17, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-070,SA,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 03, 1997 APPLICANT: CATHOLC COMMUNITY SERVICES/RENTON PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE: BURNETT AVENUE FAMILY HOUSING WORK ORDER NO: 782232 LOCATION: 633.Burnett Avenue South SITE AREA: 7,381 Sq.Ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 6,352 Sq.Ft. (new) SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review(ECF), an Administrative Site Plan(SA), and a Variance(V), in order to construct and manage six(6)units of affordable housing. The variance would allow the applicant to exceed the lot coverage limit established by the RM-U Zone. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth ✓ Housing Ir Air 1e Aesthetics Vr Water J Light/Glare V Plants it Recreation ✓ Land/Shoreline Use ✓ Utilities t/ Animals r _ Transportation I.-Environmental Health ✓ Public Services v Energy/ / Historic/Culture/ V Natural Resources Preservation _ Airport Environment I, 10,000 Feet ✓ 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this ap•ication with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additi•.:1 informa,• is needed to properly assess this proposal. .-- • # 0 ' ' , 3U.400- LOB t ffT Signature of ', ecto or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/83 • g Y -- i r n \_. -6;ra- . 1 ( " 84\ 7 -.I.': 10 ] 4c9MIt I �� 1 . „ 1 I .,IPEff_ toltiq\.. -*- : , _l l r r .-■ 9 a_�rI _ �■ r• IIIIT ■ ■ ra+a 1 ir` +o`, / nw' -_r—(`]' '^ `" .a �' Ii, `aKI teF _ -OP_ l. . iii '. r - . ---- -ci-z. ,,,e-- 1.r rm iiilhh I 40.1..----- A iiircle ge opra, . - .- 1 \ - 1 Al F., illiK"\\ 6 ._. -ici. Y in - '.7iiii,<-0"-e 1. .„/ :A\ ..41:4 I11-'11 i..__,i•o1.n I'.1F,i/I"!I-.,A.l l-iii.:t:J.,.al•at iI irs-iINrtmi7 I,..I4 ec't 1;1pi0l1 11 l \,t, - -.....1.,,.,*1 EC"5••••a :, _-17.-i,_;--1i,i.,"A aig:71 if0iil[i- LM! 4IEJit / ..0.,„.f .."p ofIi4-0d •6\4,6i0,,,. -0\.. \--k-.A-..*7.'..',2.r 7- r_i--t1\2. r r , �, ighl 1111)4 ett4._. illIPV \\- ' ' 4 .--iiiip.,,„'',<I0Ellacigff- 4: gl. i;/,,,_.....4,411:7;.__, .7 ' . • , riqii6 illtV 4.r4 Ric ...7.. a H Kiln%....H...io miummt,,,. . )1 . 1,_v 1 Pc‘. .-_. gliNallehl, .. —7— ikil.1 '/. n Alai Figre mod.... s ropiRnItj , w'r � / - liqtitoff9.44',: — -Wirm r_______,. zit.* .i., (-7, -41, 4,... c ,:re',11- •- tcyr'=.,. '' .,-ii,,,,,.,,,--, i. 110 II-3 41...._ , , . i. ,._11.ii : ii. iii, I A leqtr4t ). ' / °' itv,I.P1 '. .17-r , 1 th N16,.. e. ._ 'mai man I .. li" 4 + in — VIS 11]MI •1 i min • 1 {) 4.5 - . r. IF Lt.,,,., _ 1 tH -. ' r , , 1 IN N 1 --"1:" ER2K0 1111 I Aill.: 1 .._iiInv \ .- 8 liff.'RXELI 5-A'!_-..w.t,?_0 I on_,1,lis„,.ri-,,ri.„.4`7,;.5..,r,,z.-_ ‘:-•N./-:>,4:-_ ' v � , i _= _=_==_- _ -& o• , Ea:J ) l r i_,:-1 si:_-7,.-.C\E-=N HOC N_i,I_7"'_OraM,,.jay r,piig. i_a_,,IA _:_--::-- --::E::_:::E:.--E:::-:.:::E:::.-:-E:E:-::5:.I!:'.7:K-._;::-E5E"':-:.._::-::E::::.:::-].:E:-_::-".":.E:-E.::-E1:7--:"::-E::.-:E.:.:::-E..-,-:::::.-::".::3:-E:.:a-3:E.:::—:.;:-E".:::.::-7_:E.:.:Ei::•.::-i:::::-.::-:.:7-:E...:EE-.E:-:E.::-E:'7.F:--E-1:.-,.:E:-Ef:._--EE_:i...:E:-E...-Ei:::E:I:::--7\::ff.::E3:EM::::E:-:-:E__-,:':E::-::.J:7--t.::.,:1:._:E-:1 1.1i:7:]n-:i..;—m-iw-E,::"':i.::-:-.7..--E".:-:::1::--:-.:7-:P±:---.:7-E..:-E1‘._--:- =.1-. 7.1Iw''L fT,--- r ` -H.:_,7 U1ir 1 —kliDHi,CI IL.P_I2_i9I,I,,LP F'1 i,4M,1,f Lc'"C\11i,i [ ti •-r 1 1i . •-• 1 _----_ '__-__- 7 '-----\ \ W VVV ti _ )f r I L <iv 1-3354-_-:---- - I Ilkill -'. ' . rm.EfEa ):::::::::::::::K:::E:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::_:•_::::ZEM-a•:::]:-__--EER-E:If:F:__::"2-a-E----:__ 41 JF iir ‘ .-• �i Yam, I _ _ _ ).. ..- 4 , W. i Arigre,_::-_-_E37.3-1:_gEs:::::::::-:53:::::::::::-...E_EE__--fz--::::-::-:.:IE:_:-_-_:---c-fir(---:-:::::::3-:.-;;:-EE:E:-EE:_:::::_-__..-:::_g::::--.E_E--__E-:-...E::::::::::::::40:-:.::::--.:E:::::Es..:::EiEE.3::---.:E r ! ,isi i I 1 ..., .,,, lay.._i__...,_-_,:x4-g.o.:ww-- 0,, -_::::::::::_t::::::::::::::::_:_.::::::::::::,:::::::.-_-_____:::::::.?...::::".3_,___A:z___:_::____::_:_:_____:_ . „,, \,,,,,. A �� w R / TijIIJr , pJ� =� City or'canton Department of Planning/Building/F , Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:eANSkvkiLhm SamucC. COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 17, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-070,SA;V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 03, 1997 APPLICANT: CATHOLC COMMUNITY SERVICES/RENTON PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE: BURNETT AVENUE FAMILY HOUSING WORK ORDER NO: 782232 LOCATION: 633 Burnett Avenue South SITE AREA: 7,381 Sq.Ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 6,352 Sq.Ft. (new) SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review(ECF), an Administrative Site Plan (SA), and a Variance(V), in order to construct and manage six(6) units of affordable housing. The variance would allow the applicant to exceed the lot coverage limit established by the RM-U Zone. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing _ Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare • Plants Recreation _ Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS/-) We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ad ' nal information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /77 S' ature o it or uthonzed Representative Date D APP.DOC Rev.10/93 City tenton Department of Planning/Building/I Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: %kJ' L COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 17, 1997. APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-070,SA,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 03, 1997 APPLICANT: CATHOLC COMMUNITY SERVICES/RENTON PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE: BURNETT AVENUE FAMILY HOUSING WORK ORDER NO: 782232 LOCATION: 633 Burnett Avenue South SITE AREA: 7,381 Sq.Ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 6,352 Sq.Ft. (new) SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review(ECF), an Administrative Site Plan (SA), and a Variance(V), in order to construct and manage six(6) units of affordable housing. The variance would allow the applicant to exceed the lot coverage limit established by the RM-U Zone. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major . Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airpor+Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet &-V1)2- /71D °'76 ig` B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS -4,(/J� G (z C � � GCS 354 .5/ pezi A C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS tee __ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informatio . needed to properly assess this proposal. Ze (6 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City_...snton Department of Planning/Building/P ._. Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: NI'GC- COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 17, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-070,SA,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 03, 1997 APPLICANT: CATHOLC COMMUNITY SERVICES/RENTON PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE: BURNETT AVENUE FAMILY HOUSING WORK ORDER NO: 782232 LOCATION: 633 Burnett Avenue South SITE AREA: 7,381 Sq.Ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 6,352 Sq.Ft. (new) SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review(ECF), an Administrative Site Plan (SA), and a Variance(V), in order to construct and manage six(6) units of affordable housing. The variance would allow the applicant to exceed the lot coverage limit established by the RM-U Zone. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet a n®2.e B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ad "onal information is needed to properly asse this proposal. Signature Of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 PROJECT LUA-97-070, SA, V, ECF Catholic Community Services City of Renton Department of Planning /Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) POLICE RELATED COMMENTS 5.52 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually CONSTRUCTION PHASE Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and should also be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. COMPLETED BUILDING It is recommended that a coded access entry to the main building be installed to prevent trespassing of individuals who have no right to be on the property. Each unit should have solid core doors, preferably metal or metal over solid wood with peep holes and heavy-duty dead bolt locks. The bolts need to be at least 1-1/2" in length when extended and installed with 3" wood screws. Sliding windows, including the glass patio doors, will need additional locks; these locks will need to secure the windows from being pried out of the frames vertically. This means the locks will need to be placed into the top or bottom of the frames, in addition to any lock that limits horizontal movement. Alarm systems are recommended for each unit. The stairways at the complex should be constructed of lattice or metal railing so visibility is possible through the stairway. There should not be any solid walls in any stairway that would serve to limit the visibility up and down the stairs and provide a place for a criminal to hide while waiting for a homeowner to return home. In additional, the balcony walls also need to be made of either metal or wood lattice or railing - no solid walls for the same purpose. Extra security lighting needs to be installed in the parking lot, along the sidewalks, and in the stairways. This lighting also needs to be extended to the garbage disposal site. Proper lighting will provide the extra security needed when residents are walking to this area in the hours of darkness. Each unit should have their individual numbers listed clearly, with the number at least 6" in height of a color that contrasts with the color of the building and Page 1 of 2 PROJECT LUA-97-070, SA, V, ECF Catholic Community Services City of Renton Department of Planning /Building /Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) placed under a light. This will aid police or medics who respond to a call in finding the unit they need to go to. Landscaping around the exterior of the property should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the property the look of a fortress and make the residents feel isolated, and could also possibly give a burglary sufficient coverage to break into a unit. Page 2 of 2 City t,,Ranton Department of Planning/Building/Pc,.__ Works R E its TO N FIRE ID FT ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEETFAU REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: c re FreUA.�uM COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 17, 1997 JUN U 4 i APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-070,SA,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 03, 1997 6"ti N_ � r I �II E APPLICANT: CATHOLC COMMUNITY SERVICES/RENTON PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE: BURNETT AVENUE FAMILY HOUSING WORK ORDER NO: 782232 LOCATION: 633 Burnett Avenue South SITE AREA: 7,381 Sq.Ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 6,352 Sq.Ft. (new) SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review(ECF), an Administrative Site Plan (SA), and a Variance(V), in order to construct and manage six(6)units of affordable housing. The variance would allow the applicant to exceed the lot coverage limit established by the RM-U Zone. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000-Feet �19 �/ ,114,000 Feet /0 /1 0 t(I 0,- ?Arc? 1 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS /VA II AA C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Z L J (0 pfej4 7' Sled We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional in-rmation is needed to props assess this proposal. 0 �47 Signature of ' - tor orb At� � Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 • tiVY O ., (15 • ♦ CITY OF RENTON 4,6. re FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: June 4, 1997 TO: Mark Pywell, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshalif(t SUBJECT: Burnett Ave. Family Housing, 633 urnett Av. S Fire Department Comments: 1. The required preliminary fire flow is 1500 GPM. Two fire hydrants are required, one within 150 feet of the structure and one within 300 feet of the structure. 2. A fire sprinkler system is required by City Ordinance. Separate plans and permits are required. 3. The sprinkler system shall be monitored by an approved central station fire alarm system. Separate plans and permits are required. 4. A second exit may be required for the third floor units. 5. A fire mitigation fee of$2328.00 is required. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department Plan Review-Water Comments Due: NNE 17, 1997 Application No.: LUA-97-070,SA,V,ECF Date Circulated: June 3, 1997 Applicant: Catholic Community Service/Renton Project Manager: Mark Pywell Housing Limited Partnership Project Title: BURNETT AVENUE FAMILY Work Order No: 782232 HOUSING Location: 633 Burnett Avenue South Site Area: 7,381 Sq. Ft. Building Area(gross): 6,352 Sq. Ft. (new) A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No Comment. B.Policy-Related Comments No Comment. C. Code-Related Comments The existing 4" water main located in Smithers Ave. So. will require replacement with a new 8" water main from South 7th Street North to the site's north property line (approximately 77 line. ft.). Water (SDC)fees of$510 per multi-family unit will be required. 6.-/Z-77 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date h:mp\catholi2 City or Kenton Department of Planning/Building/P4:...., Norks ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: p, Review— k)ccrivcOMMENTS DUE: JUNE 17, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-070,SA,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 03, 1997 APPLICANT: CATHOLC COMMUNITY SERVICES/RENTON PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE: BURNETT AVENUE FAMILY HOUSING WORK ORDER NO: 782232 LOCATION: 633 Burnett Avenue South SITE AREA: 7,381 Sq.Ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 6,352 Sq.Ft. (new) SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review(ECF), an Administrative Site Plan(SA), and a Variance(V), in order to construct and manage six(6)units of affordable housing. The variance would allow the applicant to exceed the lot coverage limit established by the.RM-U Zone. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Alrpor!Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 3 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department Plan Review - Comments Due: JUNE 17, 1997 Sufrace/Wastewater(Sanitary Sewer) Application No.:LUA-97-070,SA,V,ECF ; Date Circulated: June 3, 1997 Applicant: Catholic Community Service/Renton Project Manager:Mark Pywell Housing Limited Partnership Project Title: BURNETT AVENUE FAMILY Work Order No: 782232 HOUSING Location: 633 Burnett Avenue South Site Area: 7,381 Sq. Ft. Building Area(gross): 6,352 Sq. Ft. (new) A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No Comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No Comment. C. Code-Related Comments Side sewer permit at$80/per connection will be required. Sanitary sewer(SDC)fees of$350 per multi- family unit will be required. -/2 - 77 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date H:mp\catholil City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department Plan Review - Surface Comments Due:JUNE 17, 1997 Water(Drainage) Application No.: LUA-97-070,SA,V,ECF Date Circulated: June 3, 1997 Applicant: Catholic Community Service/Renton Project Manager:Mark Pywell Housing Limited Partnership Project Title: BURNETT AVENUE FAMILY Work Order No: 782232 HOUSING Location: 633 Burnett Avenue South Site Area: 7,381 Sq. Ft. Building Area(gross): 6,352 Sq. Ft. (new) A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No Comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No Comment. C. Code-Related Comments Surface water (SDC)fees of$0.129 per square foot of new impervious area on the site (not less than $385)will be required. -/z -77 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date h:mp\catholic • City or kenton Department of Planning/Building/Fuoric Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: swf acei w t,� OMMENTS DUE: JUNE 17, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-070,SA,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 03, 1997 APPLICANT: CATHOLC COMMUNITY SERVICES/RENTON PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE: BURNETT AVENUE FAMILY HOUSING WORK ORDER NO: 782232 LOCATION: 633 Burnett Avenue South SITE AREA: 7,381 Sq.Ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 6,352 Sq.Ft. (new) SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review(ECF), an Administrative Site Plan (SA), and a Variance(V), in order to construct and manage six(6)units of affordable housing. The variance would allow the applicant to exceed the lot coverage limit established by the RM-U Zone. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department Plan Review - Comments Due: JUNE 17, 1997 Transportation Application No.: LUA-97-070,SA,V,ECF Date Circulated: June 3, 1997 Applicant: Catholic Community Service/Renton Project Manager: Mark Pywell Housing Limited Partnership Project Title: BURNETT AVENUE FAMILY Work Order No: 782232 HOUSING Location: 633 Burnett Avenue South Site Area: 7,381 Sq. Ft. Building Area(gross): 6,352 Sq. Ft. (new) A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No Comment. B.Policy-Related Comments Traffic mitigation fee of$75/new average daily trip in and out of the site will be required. C. Code-Related Comments Street improvements will be require to meet current City Codes/Standards. New concrete sidewalk located in(easement)on the South 7th Street frontage of the site will be required. -Iz-- 77 Signature of Direc or or Authorized Representative Date h:mp\catholi3 Pahl City t:...anton Department of Planning/Building/Pt 2,, r,Works , ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:"TV ' .a-fi0-V\ COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 17, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-070,SA,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 03, 1997 APPLICANT:. CATHOLC COMMUNITY SERVICES/RENTON PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE: BURNETT AVENUE FAMILY HOUSING WORK ORDER NO: 782232 LOCATION: 633 Burnett Avenue South SITE AREA: 7,381 Sq.Ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 6,352 Sq.Ft. (new) SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review(ECF), an Administrative Site Plan(SA), and a Variance(V), in order to construct and manage six(6)units of affordable housing. The variance would allow the applicant to exceed the lot coverage limit established by the RM-U Zone. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information impacts impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Ught/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shorellne Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable Impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 CY..).-- C* 410A7i•lithliTS767t41.5ttai''44'4"....AV/171"64...- . x .; r�...gounrwa� ,wa�� e , '��..:��,: , .elf�-�. :-....„3„.i.,..,-i--, .,,,t_....,..,!, . Project Name 6 Rcy<<{7.1 A.:. r:-! toi hi 1-l');.{,./Jj• I 1 Project Address C. -3-3_1 i3 v fr( + f' Contact Person Srtt pi;l,;;A;t. la(.,.. }t If/+.r ,:.�Ii.:I:c. L•:..,,,i14', 5tf;Ni,_ :{ ,,!:),,7 ei„,-1,,( - Address IUO ? 1JAI) ; . ::,t,all/e i-'',1 `?!JAI Phone Number (24)6% S - '.i6 1(6: . • Permit Number I-'-)'' - ci l - 0 ;L' Project Description (:6,0;f,'tr L7 sly ( 6 ) to;1 I alai;i'i.if(t vl f (.C.+ I,'%✓i.t I;le )1 SIr�/ ) LT ie / t'r,C%j i!!j[;i . ;l;Illi., iq_cL¢.e . Land Use Type: Method ojCalculation: ' /t (--- i 0/Residential 0" ITE Trip Generation Manual eq.<. I 1 ❑ Retail 0 Traffic Study j':; tr 6.1f i - ❑ Non-retail 0 Other Calculation: 1 r Ay 1' J F-,'', 11w'% i11•G(: 1 '.1 , ( 2:c 7. )('t ' ) - r 2 1 `75 - 2. 5 Transportation Mitigation Fee: Calculated by: ,lec-/I t(//G(i; Date: 6--"A-)A,./ Account Number: Date of Payment 11. CITE- 43F RENTON Nry :.iL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 13, 1997 • • Ms. Stephanie Durman Catholic Community Services of Western Washington 100-23rd Avenue South Seattle, WA 98144 SUBJECT: Burnett Avenue Family Housing Project No. LUA-97-070,SA,V,ECF ' Dear Ms. Durman: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on June 24, 1997. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. There will be no public hearing associated with this project. Once the City has made a determination on this project, there will be a comment and an appeal period. You will be notified of the determination and the dates of the comment and appeal period. Please contact me, at (425) 277-5586, if you have any questions. Sincerely, 0,136#, Mark R. Pywe CP Project Man er cc: CCS/Renton HousingLimited Partnership P Parties of Record ACCPTLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton,Washington 98055 r4►n._ . . - . . -_ . . _ . _ . . . HNOT1OE1 PENDING APPLICATION PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: BURNETT FAMILY HOUSING I LUA-97-070,SA,V,ECF . DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review(ECF),en Administrative Site Plan • (SA),and a Variance(V),in order to construct and manage six(6)units of affordable housing.The valance would allow the applicant to exceed the lot coverage limit established by the RM-U Zone. GENERAL LOCATION: 833 Burnett Avenue South . PUBLIC APPROVALS: - _Building Permit _Preliminary Plat _Shod Plat • _Conditional Use Permit _Rezone XXXX Admin.Site Plan Approval ' XXXX Environmental Review —Shoremilinet Conditional Use XXXX ADMIN.VARIANCE Per ' Fill&Grade Pennh _Shoreline Substantial _Other • Development Permit ' • The application can be reviewed In the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. • Comments will be accepted any time prior to Environmental Review Committee(ERG)meetings,Public Hearings,during Public Hearings,or prior to an administrative decision. For further Information on the application,or If you wish to be ' , made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications,please contact the Development Services Division at • 235-2550. %/ Z. L_J oV_4 Li LI 17La x•u r u:�t A— ' A ,5Ty s . -r.7 1 I 1�, a a IP I _ S. I ©i 0' j - a LJ fi < b--1ti i> s ,1-0 CD_e'y,E.vt LGJil'js e .t :. r0i. o i o i aZt .,n7 I © 3r e c7 T.i ItV:� o�8 t to 8s • • 'P�I,®O• 3'-d'1Z roil .'eo*i'2 CO�•; i Q-• -!e•-f -6-6 DTI i.=°_ ,o,ol(�:,, ©� La.. :W t -1 '_`' • 6TN ST. dip L ...7 �. zn �� ` it l• 1 ��.R—� �a�tip",7 0 0 4, wiIuau•s Coowr� ' . • v. T'j-IF 4t�12.0. f,,II of/ r,e�°:Q�=' / •••3,, Qo;�t. r j/•i°(�11'1II.'r—In P• ©-,II'�C7q/ •.F.� /¢('. .•e N u °I 'r y.•47 Jl-. I..LL'.JJ1 p:.k ii�l-9-.lu '',"—,/ "J_s:. g ;.�t/� . --•TT _sr---�c �' _-__-- .bra/` 1. • ! ,, li j��. ,.:rim 1 /rYt,•�°j 4 ,`�' ,. , . •. rn��, ,h O�pI I•1 , • .npfP' . ... I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION...,:.I ' • • CERTIFICATION ' i, Sun, S071 , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted 1• a in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on e. 13,1`711 • • Signed: 94 I . WASHINGTON • STATE OF ASHI �! ) SS . COUNTY OF KING . ) _ ' • certify that I know or have satisfactory % �e evidence thati-L ..•'c� ->— . signed ned this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their freed k .Iuntary act for the uses 1" qan .purposes mentioned in the instrument. ' " ;1,1+ °�..« ^, Notary Publi In and for the Stale of shinglon °4'gt�lj Notary (Print) MARILYN KAMCHEFF �� n "9 My appointment • . NO TARY,DOC _ . . , NOTICE PENDING APPLICATION PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: BURNETT FAMILY HOUSING/LUA-97-070,SA,V,ECF • DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review(ECF),an Administrative Site Plan (SA),and a Variance(V),in order to construct and manage six(6)units of affordable housing. The variance would allow the applicant to exceed the lot coverage limit established by the RM-U Zone. GENERAL LOCATION: 633 Burnett Avenue South PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit Preliminary Plat Short Plat Conditional Use Permit Rezone XXXX Admin.Site Plan Approval XXXX Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Use XXXX ADMIN.VARIANCE ' Permit • Fill&Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial Other Development Permit , The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any time prior to Environmental Review Committee(ERC)meetings,Public Hearings,during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative decision. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications,please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. /�./.�' . I L AL lV J Lir, -A'o u - • - � S TH ►— tST . •: '� 'I I'I , l _ I''. Ell I (.7 :a�s 1 Z [.C:o•' r�i_, -- ``yyIISiik :N 41A': i I 1:)0 1 11B 73 131 [ ® �s 'IJ --1� i I I1 i MIR ID 1 19' a Fa- • I`21 i F' I :i•0• ..-a• m ls] 3 8 a o f 18 z rob o_Iv,L— i!, • ® 6 Os 1 I ee IE o , Ib U I-• �:1 li; - •:a , ; q�J• ® rr,i O Ia Cd E3 ,i.,'°lam] Lur s ;o! 7 , le'M v. -- -Ei • - - F_.L-1-7 j9I i `-ems- F,.;7^1,Tt _';; 7II -s; I�e1'1,• © 6 I7 aa.��stl I,fTaliri i gL • ti 1 4 ;r,�, 9 2 s 9 1 17 _ ]1i' :I- L '. 1.__ l JI .I --I --- `f SLC'.ad 17 '� :j t 1. I I • • 1 ,• I`Iq�'].. I.. t ;E� i0'p.rll NI „ ''6 6161. 6TH ST - ' '• ZIr -6-7 x fry ., . e d t -7 L_,. i"1 ..1� i_. ®a Q�I r� • s. r'i,�6 w7 ,::,: . •.,�ccoo�. ,. 4 �rlli io l'91cri �f ;WILLIAMS COURT- & o II W _ E �,,,.. ,�' /. Is,• .�,K, L.-sl 1 1. 't.--- •a s ACOND 30 UNITS. �\;:" ,s e nn > � I7 �, 0 `i�,17 <<• ..F,':�I• 'QI_ / .9 615 �5 1. D. --__ ' Its s ,s C'" i„.,. y s Nc o .:'• ; Ili— V- _ ..7 I :i< l 7 4, 0 _!�• .{I.lUO�;,1r 181 :it" ;• i • : lall'�• \�"..( t e� �4C �' 3 . c�:V9 ,7 In,A( :1;i - Ip2�t, _ �J 1 hJ..C`A[' IA6n;. ;ll ,,r/ i I,i , I _ ,t aAPiL[It l O .O 1 0' I _ . . ,." . : . .., ..i....„.. 0Y ,-- 0 ',,," ..'1-! ! ::, - !--.___ r 0 , PLEASE`INCLUDE>'THE=PROJECT.NUMBER;WHEN;.CALLING:POR;PROPER;FILE:IDENTIFICATION <r:` <;:'< • , lillqIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII -r ( ., .. , CITY OF RENTON v- ''' j-1-1 C4 lUs: F. Development Seances Division +-- ""I CC 200 Mill Avenue South (...1t — Renton,Washington 98055 a, I— • a. r.„1„. ,6,,,,,- , tv A 7P-18;1274E7R I.LJ a:C/1 U.S. POSTA gamOLC-..fitt.....1170CtCq12TCri. CM* Cc gc fa 'e-tt*, 'ci-7 GE----i sx,tx ?X st i t t.-a.rutt.t.i 16—Le is S.FrM PANNIN Cl . c .,z• : DEVELOPMENTL "Ilr .,,, a= ilt • ry r,•• ,,...,,,,..,'„ _ '' / 784030 0110 -., • .. •'1.,,,* Wc1-4111 it 11 WENDER f ADDRESS JUN 0 P 1997 ti 6 0 L-,i'4-2,,,i-•_ .a,j`'igY",i', ' k - cUtEkAirc , Agieitst-4'4 gal • :" ♦ ifilFit 4. NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL.APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON An Environmental Checklist Review (ECF), Administrative Site Plan (SA), Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: BURNETT AVENUE FAMILY HOUSING/LUS-97-070,SA,V,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review (ECF), an Administrative Site Plan (SA), and a Variance (V), in order to construct and manage six (6) units of affordable housing. The variance would allow the applicant to exceed the lot coverage limit established by the RM-U Zone. GENERAL LOCATION: . 633 Burnett Avenue South PUBLIC APPROVALS:;._ = Environmental Review' . Site.`Plan.Approval - - - -. _Variance. ' The application can'be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) meeting date, Public Hearings, during Public Hearings,"or prior to an administrative decision. For further information on the'application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s)for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550: Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. .Y s a p 5TH ig2Mln'ILIST . - SIN 15r,;i ,�1 �c�,� cf izi®. A riRl �t 59f81t5ii�tE � m ..'; a1 '�� it '®' •I•s'• J' 1& 1 3- .®1 a ■ i,,7::. , .. �J r.f' 6%: Ertl, , niMI r _ I ie L:L71 r� ©i yk,n .B d e p. C� l�nn y n, . �l®1 m Ce OH I . ®rill-y) ., . ra ail,.._. •® mil®: ` a 3• + -" `16vdsi "d^. 3.-0a . _.2 ,::ia :Rim. , ..,1, m"■�Pun.aC.t.& _,i,,e Any. �g4 „ ofi %S 6TH sr : r�Y3iC lil!- y EA : s.sn,_sr iliP d con - it M a Q3 ,. d�'4'2 7 nlu.01i.EunT 1 ' c, , ' ~ ��[,�'' pI • 5,1▪ ' rr I ., Govl (1G a ie c —.—. ._.-5:—•—•—.7TN=•—•—•$T—•—•-\--•71:.- �; 13. •- • Simvt.Lotl j lig_ Yi:,P " 1 6 ri in N 1 j6loAcres 1nC . ' m 11 _yes .� .op w"' GRA �''' ItI 1 •`sue :':4i G. � 11 _ L� I GENMALOT.DOC , l . 'f\ : —�''_ Ili' �' — '"•4 % . --, c ft‘e r 0 'V-0;0> 4-25.(ea.• ...--------1 * i.s.i ti, 40, _,„„kez., 7. sa.m............•••••••11 * CITY OF RENTON cr -, , .•...1% * ( , Development Services Division 0 (-) w 1— JUN 0 4'9 T 19.:$7,4$ ,4sil : 0 .2 9 200 Mill Avenue South , is L „ , u., 03 — * Renton,Washington 980551"-Eu u'''LI ta—LI elettEl'.-alit li Ell. F MI gx. r.,..Mt..—ISL. LE 0, PB METER * cr ut- C.' irs.,• tv A * 7152447 US. POSTAGE * i.: OA° 182305 9202 s. Bobby Taylor 14300 SE 176th St Renton, WA 98058,,,A ) 0 S t„ • ., LEe: (- , . .tj'1,I,P. ;,,, •-• ) ti •'I'II' - --e A V r .se4r4-.1:ire. s r.,1- i -t:1 ..,0/ — ' H Illit '4 lithilatlillitillilialilitetiltitillitiddlillittililiiillil .',.*_.(.1.‘4,-- . ��Y O G 'eti + siliRti + ''NTO NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON An Environmental Checklist Review (ECF), Administrative Site Plan (SA), Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: BURNETT AVENUE FAMILY HOUSING i LUS47-070,SA,V,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review (ECF), an Administrative Site Plan (SA), and a Variance (V), in order to construct and manage six (6) units of affordable housing. The variance would allow the applicant to exceed the lot coverage limit established by the RM-U Zone. GENERAL.LOCATION: 633 Burnett Avenue South PUBLIC APPROVALS: • Environmental Review , _ .-.Site Plan Approval Variance _ '/ „ The application can be reviewed in the Development Services:Division located:on thethird floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to the.Environmental`Review Committee'(ERC) meeting:date, Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative decision. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s)for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. .aM .� v` � EI1'4;'4 Lg'JLQ T9•lil-C7•.Jl.Hx 'u""*'5 '„14 pmgc,. .,.•u:V.�Ka °.- S p 5TH i- x is .P 1 5TH :1 v • Nar i" r•in l `1 1 ©y 'T� 6 l r�sl 5i91B SJ�E >� m i. •os: Ella k Pni :t Ull m, I m IEI .S ' r• © I'gl B A® Mg/ : "I . - • W��TL le . Qr � "� a, a ,d, ,�Im.,,,„r -_e , .®an0 M 0 o u®ti 7a — 3eii'- h , ' ai • � sP !, j°Ja 4 ,rC � . . �5' 6TH ST t rs� .a 4.• - s -ST Sr . ki,„ �h• " Ypvi , Q,•''. _ l v v1�uasor ~ J ql IgE Ji 14T ^ 4 l u -Ig'L M Y -i , s 4 Q: a PP: "u - __ ca 0' r —.—. _.— _•—y—•TTH—._._.sr.--q—\-•--/_.w ?,. ; a `• _ •-"r.. smrt Lot i'' • `01 rj=r?;M i 36.70 Acres , • n 1 ,. -, j� I— vtl '''4?,s� .,r oM. nos; f t' ., ,:� •� �0. ' \ ;.'`, ' « RA ~' ..j=T1� .. .l:: I ''� :x :.,Vnii I �l onr 1 — GENMALOT.DOC ....- :, I • ' I .I: •t _. �3i' - 1 c.,_ . • i:� �•^"• i?:j•??}:'ii':iX:=i;{;y4:?v}i::?i:?ii:•iii ii:v?:iiii'sii:ti:iiiiii'4iiii;:jnti?i::4it}ii:ii}}:•:�':;:::::i::;:i";:::.;i::?:::x{::::.;::ti:L;i iiiii'!•:w"�ii iiiiii :•:iti}iiijiiiiii}}}};tiv:iii:}i:?{??•}:i;vi}}:i:'.}:? x:i:.... vi:�v • • • :tiCix ............ ...+:m...�:..........................................:::::::::::....:::::.:::::::.,i..1 .�f.":LlEl.�i��l�f•:;•}:•x•:•::•}:L.:?•}:}:.r:>::•:?;.>:L?•}:.}:•}:•:?•};:c>::.•t}:<?.::. •;`:•r::.x.}•.H}::�-.:: }. ..................... :.::.:: •'-.:� � :% ::::: ::i '��. ':::; ''r y <::: :: :`• ::::`:. ''` is ;. �: �:: .. ..>::..: L�:S0.�:. :...:::::..:.: :.. .�O.U.ND.Ii1I:G: .I'.I{.:. ..P`E.I��Y,.::Q. N.I=R� ..:.}::�.} n4.. j'•iiii:::}'. i?�iiii::ii:;:�;{>i}:?'v'fr}J: : ::::::::::::.:::::::..:..:::::::::n:::.::..........:is;.{:?;:?:::::::::::w::;- ...\:.::�<::: � ::i '..::?:.,.4:;::::�:v...};•-;: :.�...: .::: iiii:::: ...................:..:..................:::::.�::.....:.::.:.:::..:.....::..... :::sub ect<:si....:.::.�:.�.�:::::::.�:}::.:::.....:..�:::.,..:..v.?....::.... :>300:::feet f:the.:ii;Vwith rt. .o.. • • PROJECT NAME: Burnett Ave. Family Housing • APPLICATION NO: WA en - 010 sA)V, (G(r The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. • Parcel Number Owner Name Site Address YB Owner Phone ------------------------------------------------------------7-------------------------------- 296390 0025 03 Anderson Evelyn F 616 Morris Ave S Renton 1910 206-255-5598 296390 0020 08 Armitage Kenneth E 612 Morris Ave S Renton 1910 206-255-1862 192305 9070 03 Atlantic Richfield Com 500 S Grady Way Renton 9 1994 182305 9115 01 B E/L Investments Llc S 7 Smithers Renton 783930 0065 08 Baicy John 535 Burnett Ave S Renton 1979 296390 0010 00 Blakey Paul G Iii 604 Morris Ave S Renton 1923 296390 0010 00 Blakey -Paul G Iii 604 Morris Ave S Renton 1933 192305 9024 00 Castagno Bros Rev Trst 423 S 7th St Renton 9805 192305 9025 09 Castagno Bros Revo Tru 423 S 7th St Renton 9805 1958 192305 9025 09 Castagno Bros Revo Tru 423 S 7th St Renton 9805 1963 ' 192305 9025 09 Castagno Bros Revo Tru 423 S 7th St Renton 9805 1958 182305 9061 05 Ccs\renton Housing Lim *No Site Address* Renton 182305 9046 05 Chaya Boon & Chieko 620 S 7th St Renton 9805 1977 182305 9046 05 Chaya Boon & Chieko 620 S 7th St Renton 9805 1958 182305 9060 06 Chick Stephen P & Abby 618 Smithers Ave S Rento 1900 206-255-4102 182305 9051 07 City Of Renton S 7 Smithers Renton 172305 9136 07 Clare Mary Louise & Pa 615 Williams Ave S Rento 1902 783930 0055 00 Clark Agnes 536 Smithers Ave S Rento 1904 206-226-3786 182305 9066 00 Cugini Josephine Est 617 Burnett Ave S Renton 1926 182305 9068 08 Cugini Land & Timber C 609 S 6th St Renton 9805 182305 9056 02 Cugini Land & Timber C 604 Smithers Ave S Rento 1936 182305 9056 02 Cugini Land & Timber C 604 Smithers Ave S Rento 1986 942350 0005 04 Eighty Four Associates 609 Williams Ave S #A11 1979 783930 0070 01 Fornelia Lillian 531 Burnett Ave S Renton 1904 206-226-4476 296390 0050 01 Frazier Kim A 642 Morris Ave S Renton 1934 296390 0090 03 Frei Herbert A 611 Smithers Ave S Rento 1910 • 182305 9127 07 Fugiel Elizabeth A 619 Burnett Ave S Renton 1920 296390 0045 09 Gonedridge Ross J .632 Morris Ave S #34 Ren 1954 360-943-6362 172305 9069 08 Grassi Josephine Williams Ave S Renton 296390 0030 06 Hall Viola T 620 Morris Ave S Renton 1957 • 296390 0065 04 Holman Daniel P Jr 627 Smithers Ave S Rento 1909 206-277-0609 296390 0080 05 Huynh Henry H 619 Smithers Ave S Rento 1909 296390 0100 01 Hy-Lo-Ro 603 Smithers Ave S Rento 1928 783930 0060 03 Kelleman Frank William 540 Smithers Ave S Rento ' 1909 206-277-0916 182305 9086 06 Knoll Darrell 611 S 6th St Renton 9805 1934 206-226-1340 296390 0040 04 Laurent Ann M 628 Morris Ave S Renton 1923 206-255-5154 296390 0075 02 Lundquist Marin 621 Smithers Ave S Rento 1909 296390 0055 06 Nelson Daniel K & Mari 633 Smithers Ave S Rento 1909 206-271-3252 182305 9119 07 Perkins Edward G & Rho 540 Burnett Ave S Renton 1979 296390 0085 00 Reed Devin ti1 -4 Smithprs Ava S Renter 1948 206-235-0325 • • (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) 9 n 0 ..pp n�V 9j FtY:4 filrpm/vNl vron, NG (Continued) 192305 9092 07 Renton Fuel Company Ll 501 SW 7th St Renton 980 915460 0005 07 Renton Fuel Company L1 501 SW 7th St Renton 980 915460 0170 06 Renton Fuel Company Ll 501 SW 7th St Renton 980 296390 0005 07 Runions Ethelyn D • 600 Morris Ave S Renton 1908 206-226-5934 182305 9075 09 Silva Monica A 601 Burnett Ave S Renton 1932 182305 9075 09 Silva Monica A 601 Burnett Ave S Renton 1931 296390 0035 01 Sweet Gregory D 622 Morris Ave S Renton 1910 182305 9091 09 Swinhart William S & S 621 Burnett Ave S Renton 1929 206-226-3220 182305 9202 05 Taylor Bobby D 602 Burnett Ave S Renton 1978 784030 0110 00 Thompson Weldon E 541 Smithers Ave S Rento 1979 296390 0070 07 Tumelson Kelly L 623 Smithers Ave S Rento 1936 206-242-3444 296390 0070 07 Tumelson Kelly L 623 Smithers Ave S Rento 1919 206-242-3444 • Applicant Certification I, Paul D. Purcell , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: 0 City of Renton Technical Services Records itl Title Company Records King County Assessors Records 0 Signed ��CUD _)‘--% Date J / /97 7 .. (Applicant) NOTARY ATTESTED: gp?scri led and sworn before me, a Not ry Public, i a d for the State of Washington, residing at . n e i� day of � , 19d/ . .Signed /a1/1 (Notary Publi),-01 • mmmmmommommolv Renton':�.Uei;:;::isi::i:::;;:::«:i<:i::i:> :;;:..:s .::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. ::::�;For::Cl ,:of: : A::LIN :ili; "'`1``` >€ ''i`E>`' `'':< '":>:` :`i':'`> <:>`>> > `€ ...................................................................................... . �•�'�fFl. �ATION`.`:`OF � A G...... . :::... .. 1Jot 5 I o C . t:> ::.' �' .�`�.'�..:" .:: ::�.•.;• ;.....:.:: :i:.eet '`Cert.... :t..a.t.::::.:.:::p..:.:.::..:::::..:::.:.p.oP...�.::.:daPp. : t:.:.:::: : �:rr.#. Q:::.::::.�:.::: �� •r:.r::i:.::;.:;:.;;.:i;;i•:;•::i;.•:i;;•ir:�:;•:;:• ........ ....:::;::: :::::::i.::::i;•:.::.......:::;:::::::::: •:::::... .....:;:i•?••ih#.................................... '•:ii{:Ji:i::iy:4:ih:4}iii:^ii:iry:ii. i:>ii:ii:::i::'r:::+::�i':ryi'ni:iii:::ii:M::i•:�::Si:�:S!�:4i:i4:4:iitr}i:•:}i::::iii}i'r"S{it.i:: }iiil ii i:::•::...::::..w.:•: :•.�:::::•::.�••::y:::.�::::.:::::•:::.. ..::v::.:.::.:..::}.:::::.:.:�::::::.:..v:::::.�:::::.::::..:::::::::::v:::::::: •':'.: :•::::::Xi?i::iii:<Lji:v+%:::i:iiiijjiii:::i iijii::i:::i::is•::::i::iiii::i::;'ii::i>i::iii}>:ii::i::ii:::;:i::r9:•::::::::'':: .�...... ............:......... eac : :.... ... ...sted.. ..eftX:o:.:.:::. :: . ... ...' ...' .. ........... ........................... : ....:....... ............r�,.::.:'.:.: :•.::;:.::::;::ti:.:;:.::.:r.•;.sii: :•;. .................... ........................... ...... ......................................::::.:::.::::::::::::::::::..::::::::::::::.� ......... :'•y::6...:::: ..:&..........'.Vv::::::::iiiiii ii•:iii:::.......,;:}iii .. ..:�::::v:.... ....::•: ::•::w:::::: .�.:�.�. .:::....:n�::.�:::•:::::::;:::::::::.........:�::::.�::::::::::::. :::••::w:::;;•• ..:.�::•:.:::••. �.�r:�:�::::n .. •::im yi{• �::i .::.:.: ::::; ::<::::.:\::.. :..a:;;i i:;ii i.;:.i:;;:is:i::i::i:;2%"2':;:i;::i;:;:ii::i i:;::: ..... .;;<:i:<::�-►i>::: � :: :::>::><>::i::iii::i:: <»:<::><::<:::>:«:»::>::>:::::Da :.::.:.:.::,:...:::::..:::::.::: ::...:.. :�:.. .:.. : � :::.� . : :::. •:.fi:<ii::;:;:i;::;:i::::i::i:::;:i::iiiiii;}:iii;::tii:' F.......{.:••: :i4iiii• } :•i�::i}i :ii(,;iii::i:!';.;'.'si•}:•i::i•:::i•i:::::i::::i:i:::::C:: vi::iii�?i:Lii:iiii:< }4Y iiri:iii::iii:::iAi:i•::9:::vi:i•i'Y.y}}}'•i::L:�v:i:::::iiii:::::.:::v.:i::::`:•::{:•::O:iii4'{.�::•iii:iv:::{ir:iOi:Y;:+i}iiii4i?:4i:iJi:iiii:i::.i •isY.::ii:iQ:^ii :i '. i:i:'i:Ci:i:i::i::L:ii:::i:iii:: :}::�:i::!iiiiiCi}i;:;i i•ii}:i .:{:ri:::ji�:i:i:ni'.i:;L;:iiii:iii'•isri}:::•'.:'.i';i:•:•;.Yti}i:i:::::ii••i••{•:ryi;.�:.::.i:{v;::::.{.. :::.:' .:. .}.:.: n.{: ::• : .::. :..�.:::• :';?:•:•:;;: }:. .::::. .:...:•.;:.:.:. 'v. F::•ii..::;.:::.::•i '.:.r.;:...:::F. ,:.::•,Jv:.:: ;. :v ..::•:•.. .. ii:ii:: AT:TES A.:: S scrl e. :>and:sw r. :before:::tne, a:`Nota. ;Public° i and<for:;the::St0..:(Cof:Wash tort:;::::;:;::::: : �<•�::::<:;i::<::>:::�:::::> ::i::�;;:;;:::::::>�>>:>:>i•:>��>:s?:>:<::<:::::::>:::::::;.::i::::::<�>��i;.::::i i::::i:;>;«:>;<;;>;»::> .::iiii:':,;:::>;. :�:��•:�'i::::>"�::::>:>::�>::::>`:<.:<:: r. d i:: n;the�:::>:: ::.:.;;:>::>:is<::<:::ii::i:da. ::of:::::::>� �•�;i:::;<:::;::::<;::;:.:::.�>:::.,:�:5 es� ng.;at: ���::::i:::i:<:ii::i::;;::::i� . . � Iistprop.doc REV°"95 GARE J. PILLAR 2 COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/9/98 ti`cY 4 ha 'ePl-wN�o, NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON An Environmental Checklist Review (ECF), Administrative Site Plan (SA), Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: BURNETT AVENUE FAMILY HOUSING/LUS-97-070,SA,V,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review (ECF), an Administrative Site Plan (SA), and a Variance (V), in order to construct and manage six (6) units of affordable housing. The variance would allow the applicant to exceed the lot coverage limit established by the RM-U Zone. GENERAL LOCATION: 633 Burnett Avenue South PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Variance The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) meeting date, Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative decision. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s)for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. .Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. "are+ p'3k� 7HE Io T-N..lil P 1 I. s n 3 rTr..iE !i E `� a©' I �',e -'�; cal MOVE V4 j og • . v f• . .n _ 45 4„),_, ,..,,_, -L'Eg— gimCILI �.,p ,i a .-n a la.2 '' :'n 41 9S •u ® a NM.S:!"1":I11,1 JL,. II ohm •S 6TH ST s � ': 14 $rsrNasr ,� N ill' p- -®,, ,,, • d�„„ r .N:t�Inus gT.. 6P O•>. I /: v anon ,!jy `.P ; s© ¢ 9. - , ,' ..R.I•• � R�1 p ® P 01'e t? ,� x.• ®, "_� �� r °s Sys ��;..•. u ® Ie,: 0' s 'r:5n ®9 - - ' Y Govl f70 �0 � �.' �- 1"•:.II N: � �'t... � —5:—•—•—•7TH=•—•--ST---•—�.-7!- '. •T.r'•.iia, .._ I„ vu� E' 'h . 1. riri-- . Acresw h•. Y m .. ,, •m Q.4�; S e l Eil , �V/ 11 .. �~ ', Wp \\ moo'.- - a...• Rsv ;i �� e pY G . ,I :ice 5' „e GN• '''O''.rE"N ApY ;�\ I _ ` �O ,g: _ . �;„ GOO �' r rr IZI I '�� �� ; snM R,GM•G 5 ,. ... t,72, .,, 1\ `~J - i s• a �'. • GENMALOT.DOC I I .I r:t� _:: __. 3e` ��— P�s� "~q, , __ NoTncE , . • • PENDING APPLICATION & PUBLIC • HEARING PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: BURNETT FAMILY HOUSING I LUA-97-070,SA,V,ECF DESCRIPTION: . The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review(ECF),an Administrative Site Plan (SA).and a Variance(V)in order to construct and manage six(6)units of affordable housing.The variance would allow the applicant to exceed the lot coverage limit established by the RM-U Zone. GENERAL LOCATION: 633 Burnett Avenue South . PUBUC APPROVALS: Building Permit _Preliminary Plat _Short Plat • _Conditional Use Permit _Rezone XXXX Admin.Site Plan Approval XXXX Environmental Review _Shorsilreline Conditional Use XXXX VARIANCE Pe Fill A Grade Permit _Shoreline Substantial _Other Development Permit The date of Wednesday.July 23,1997,at 7:30 PM,has been set for a variance public hearing to review the requested • variance to exceed the lot coverage limit established by the RM-U Zone.The hearing,before the City of Renton's Board ' of Adjustment will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall,Renton,Washington.The applicant , or representative(s)of the applicant is required to be present al the public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend. . The application can be reviewed In the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. . Comments will be accepted any time prior to Environmental Review Committee(ERC)meetings,Public Hearings.during Public Hearings,or prior to an administrative decision. For further Information on the application,or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications,please canted the Development Services Division at 235-2550. • • iii &iit Ora h l _ • PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION. • CERTIFICATION • I, sA.nct 4 j ckSor , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted y me in ,. conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . Signed: Sd 9JJt4.ilYi . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) , • ) SS • COUNTY OF KING ) • • ' I certify that 1 know or have satisfactory evidence that 549U by ,171-GgcgA signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and volunt tOGt;•for4fi9e uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. z•;•; • 1�t7�+y • „ • Dated: r0/cl/q11 '�^� Notary Pubii and for h StateQ(.I�Abiltlan • Notary (Print) My appointment expi . •' ' ' COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/9/98 NOTARY,DOC otricE PENDING APPLICATION & PUBLIC HEARING PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: BURNETT FAMILY HOUSING/LUA-97-070,SA,V,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review(ECF),an Administrative Site Plan (SA),and a Variance(V),in order to construct and manage six(6)units of affordable housing. The variance would allow the applicant to exceed the lot coverage limit established by the RM-U Zone. GENERAL LOCATION: 633 Burnett Avenue South PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit Preliminary Plat Short Plat Conditional Use Permit Rezone XXXX Admin.Site Plan Approval XXXX Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Use XXXX VARIANCE Permit Fill&Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial Other Development Permit The date of Wednesday,July 23, 1997,at 7:30 PM, has been set for a variance public hearing to review the requested variance to exceed the lot coverage limit established by the RM-U Zone. The hearing,before the City of Renton's Board of Adjustment will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall,Renton,Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend. The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any time prior to Environmental Review Committee(ERC)meetings,Public Hearings,during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative decision. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. :0",. ryy'v .EJ�9, Fkl,.i l'v`. s tiroo J P s, hi 4 �..1 t 'u n rii313 5/�rre.,0 41.4i°I 4 ,14% ":-.,'- ,iig'A ,.,u F.; Vzz%.' a, ;,N,- E,,,,_ to a rt. ARLIALE MO k ®i� ,®1 ra ® ` iW V I 9. _+B b c1 7Lf"�y r . 3� �s� .�:���ta�� . F-' y�P ,. " >S 6TH ST - f;ilyr s knew.: 1 -6 '� -., - a•p��ifi i Wig ,,,"• jda ,„„., 2 iti Ira -sae acr ce.�ip:�•"ilq ;;71-`,. . d s Siw'L Lot'11 - '.I.;�;+JrI ' .4E-2N ' I 36.70 Acres I !° "� a 9i s•' .lo �P AmLP_ " .a . —. ; :, ' -1---j., , , CAS i a^.. I o r'.." t Wit, I.0 .. .. :I � ,-- - ,•-.. , .. ):PLEASE: LUDE.THE.;FKOJ NU MB _ G;E OR`;PROPERFIL)=>1DENT,,;,,, ;,,;;;;;, I NC>..: ....... ...:.. , y CITE OF RENTON sell , .` Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 3, 1997 Ms. Stephanie Durman Catholic Community Services of Western Washington 100-23rd Avenue South Seattle, WA 98144 SUBJECT: Burnett Avenue Family Housing Project No. LUA-97-070,SA,V,ECF Dear Ms. Durman: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on June 24, 1997. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. The date of Wednesday, July 23, 1997, at 7:30 PM, has been set for a variance public hearing to review the requested variance to exceed the lot coverage limit established by the RM-U Zone. The hearing, before the City of Renton's Board of Adjustment will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton,Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend. Please contact me, at (425) 277-5586, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Mark ell,AICP Project Manager cc: CCS/Renton Housing Limited Partnership ACCPTLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ................ ..... ............ ....::...... .. ..... : . E ICES 4.I...I.StON...................... »::>:<:>::>::>:::::<:»::;:::;»»>::;..... :::.;:; >::».:;: ENT.S .R.... >1.NEo R ...............................:..:::::::0....:..:.�.::::::.:..................................,..::• .:::...:::.:...:....:.:::,....::,.:::. ":owner''€ �fease>aftach. Note•'•.> f:tFere>smorefYariioni'1e al:•.:........�................ ... notarized:>Master'A�ppliaatiori:fo:. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: CCS/Renton Housing Limited Partnership Burnett Ave. Family Housing PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 100-23rd Ave. S. 633 Burnett Ave. S. CITY: Seattle ZIP: 98144 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 182305-9061-05 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206)328-5696 EXISTING LAND USE(S): vacant rior sir le famil residence >Nigiii<> AP.PLI:CAN:I Itggther>th.o.r owns..:.}::.:.:.:.............. (P 9 y ) PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: n/a multifamily housing - 6 units COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: CD ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): same CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: RM-U TELEPHONE NUMBER: PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): O sa me • SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: _^Stephanie Durman 7,381 S.F. • PROJECT VALUE: :COMPANY(if applicable): Catholic Community Services of Western Washington $400,000 ADDRESS: 100-23rd Ave. S. IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? no CITY: Seattle, WA ZIP: 98144 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY�aFpn ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206)328-5648 no MAY s 5 0 1997 DE'VEw14mLN I PLANNING CITY OF RENTON 1 >LEG 1[ D PlPROPERTY A fa.ch se r oh . if e :.< .;:.;::.::.:::.;:.;:.;::.::: ...........::.. V.:OF::PRO..::....:.. :....::..(..:..t........:.. .. a.:.a .:.eet...::n...:cess.a.r..:.:1.::::::::::..::::.::.::.:..�...... i See Attached. 1 1 j 1 :T<IOIS &iiifE:;:.:;:;»< <s<'><t i::a `'?>> < <'< « <'' >> ' ><> TYp.E::.� F..A ........ k ; ;:::ter I > r:min. i fe.es :::::»::igii i:::<.::<i!ig:>::»:::<:»::>:>:::>:::>:>::::: >:; :<:::><::::>::»:<:>:>:>::»»::::::»:::>:::;:><:::. k:: I>:: li. a: )o.n:: . . :es::: ha:>>a I. ..::::. �. ..«:: :: aff.... ) l..dete : ...::::::.:::::.:::::::..:...:.:Che.c ..al..a. ., ....c..t.........t.. .........t....t..... . ... :.....G.t. ...sf........................:.:.:...:::.:�:::.::�:e..�.::.::....:::.::: :: .::: ::.�:::::::.::.:::::::._: —ANNEXATION . $ SUBDIVISION: — COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ 1 _ REZONE $_ — LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $_ _ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ —TENTATIVE PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ • — PRELIMINARY PLAT $ �C SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ foO,').00 — FINAL PLAT $ _GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ X VARIANCE $ 50,00 (FROM SECTION: 4- 1-001c1) _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ _ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION — MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ 1 _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: j _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ ' _ VARIANCE $ ' _ EXEMPTION $No Charge X ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ 500.,CO REVISION $ 1 <>:: :<:;:<:.:::>:<:>::»::;<;::>:;>::>::>:<::<:::�;:»>::;�:><:»:<:>:<:::>:>:::»>:::.»»>::::::;>�:>:::: <:>:<:>::»:: :<:::: < VIT<Q.F::O:WN.ERSH.I ....... ... .. . I, (Print Name) Paul D. Purcell ,declare that I am (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application,X the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 1 Paul D. Purcell, ATTEST: Subscribed and worn to before me, a Notary Public, in and Vice President / for he St to of %6 residing at (Na of Owner/ resentative) /►S �s� �. on the �sday of • VCA-v-i}O\ l), .i Ivi il I (Signature of Owner/Representative) , (...,2,i,01P/ / iu (Signe, Notary 'ublic) St ::::>:>:::<>;>;;:>;:: :>::::>.:i.i,>::pi,::: 1:!: '. ;:: :..i:> r :::>:::Thls sec I d:aae:co'ri Ited.. . .. .l i:$ .. ). ;:<:::.: :::ii$: ;i...;:: . .:iiri i ;: . ,.O: . :'i.i::::: ::. >:<: <:::<:::: :>:::> :::: :::>::.::.:a?>::: :;<.::<:::.::::>:>: P:im.R V M R:> <>1t:>;...,:.: : ;::::>::>::;::>:> .:: .:. . .: tuber...; ...::. :�;... .'7Q.... :. SA; RSHPL. GIJ:::.:LLA. (?P. FP. TF' S :. :: .:.:::..:::.::.:::::.:..:.:::: :C(t EllaNu....:. ,< ��� � ::::::...:..:..:::::.::::::::.:::..:.::.:.:: ::..AA Q.....W.;>;.::FP..:U D::.;.S.M :>S IVI.E>»N1.H P::>>:i3SP :>Q°:... .. ....... ......... ......................... :.:: - .::.;;>:.;;. ::.;:>.<::;.: TOTAL;FEES..; .:1 590.; TO.TAL;:POTAGE.;:P 6>•e MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 9/96 i The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, state of Washington, and described as follows : Beginning at a point 550 . 72 feet west and 16 feet north of the corner common to Sections 17, 18 , 19 and 20,. Township. 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.. , in King County, Washington, said distance being measured along and at right angles to the line between Sections 18 and 19 ; thence north 86 . 95 feet ; thence east 115 feet, more or less, to, the west line of Burnett Street; thence southwesterly along the curve of said street to a point 16 feet north of the south line of said Section 18 ; thence west 67 . 95 feet to the point of beginning; (BEING KNOWN AS Lot 10 , Wood' s Addition to the City of Renton, according to the unrecorded plat thereof) . EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the City of Renton by deed recorded November 13 , 1995 under King County Recording Number 9511130944 . J' f • • •✓;...+11. i• y; • . mettle RPco*DED aETUMN TO: Project tt enne: Mee Otte My Crest se::,em our ems 9utatne WARRANTY DEED Paul Tex Acesuai f.1123054001 =M U Avenues South armhole)mem Wise O RANO..WA 94031 STa: 1127 S • a Stow tstff+.oa•.: 3 7A St ig . t afe..a/11N; Grantor.Stephen Pouch Anleart PDlieh_Jtusband and"Life,for and in consideration of Ten Dollars($10.01)) and other valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,Rnmts,conveys,and dedicates to theSity of Renton. a Municipal Corporation. Grantee herein. the following described real estate,for. Right-of-Way purposes,attuned in the County of King,State of Washington. • 2 • o That portion at the fallowing demand Meet X lyiajaontheast t to disc teglwdag at.a point ce the math - • line of said Tract X 6.06 fees west of the southeast corner of said.Tract X and emending to the northeast corner of said Tract X. Tract X: Beginning at a point 550.72 feet west and 16 feet north of the corner common to Sections 17,13,19, aced 20.Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,in King County,Washington,said distance being measured r, a along end et rEght abates to the tine between Sections 18 and 19; C f 11 Thence north 66.95 feet; 0 I. '1 tts 'Thence cast ii5 feet.mare or lest,to ties west lice c ::nett Street; 01 Thence southwesterly along the come of said street to a point 16 feet worth of the south line of said Section 1t; 0 Thence west 67.95 feet to the point of beginning; CI (Deist known as Lot lo,Wood's Addition to the City of Renton,according to the unrecorded plat ihereot). r. - .4 Contains an area of 322.91 square feet.or 0.0074 acre,M/L. n IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said corporation has caused this instrument to be executed this'f day r - hi 4 C'I _ > f „t of �- f, �.,: , 19 1 tel Approved ate'Accepted By: ..A____ Pertg„,;_ __ City of Renton Stephen PItrh • BY: (c. \ti X 1 \ ,,p,- UL.. —_° �,r,�1tc: Mayor Earl. C1yme Jp 9eter Pol • • / • City Clerk Mxr14,n J. Petersen fECEIVED STATE OF WAS{-]INGTON ) NOV 1 ) ss 1il. COUNTY OF KING ) KING COUNTY UI certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that • R� QDE as who bt' appeared before me, and said persnns acknowledged that they signed this instrument and acknowledged it to • X be their free and vole ary act fur the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. a, Dated 7�' i �%! /. SG•S ...//�' Notary Public!Wind for the State of.Washington residing at/b1,.e " 2..: �'1: . y €,- 3 Notary(print): f/o�J•Qi / r,_'Sro/i• . 004' My appointment expires' 1 ...�g,�i •. . f: 0 rotmelwdffd.doc ' 4. 415-ODS,f L� '4���CATHOLIC 100 23rd Avenue South COMMUNITY Seattle,WA 98144-2302 SERVICES Phone:(206)328-5696 of Western Washington Fax:(206)328-5699 May 30, 1997 Mark Pywell Planning, Building&Public Works Division City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: 633 Burnett Avenue South Variance Request& Site Plan Approval Dear Mr. Pywell: Per the recent pre-application conference regarding our proposed project at 633 Burnett Avenue South, the CCS/Renton Housing Limited Partnership is now requesting a Site Plan Approval and a Variance to allow us to construct the six-unit multifamily housing project as proposed in the attached plans. As discussed in the pre-application letter dated April 22, 1997,we are requesting that you approve the proposed design which includes surface parking, zero setbacks for the front and rear yards, and lot coverage in excess of 75%. As you are aware, the need for these approvals is driven by substantial site restraints unique to this lot, including a high water table, irregular lot shape, and having streets on three sides. These approvals are critical to our ability to develop the project,which we feel will be an asset to the City of Renton because it will provide much needed affordable housing for low-income Renton families. The project addresses City of Renton priorities for providing affordable housing in areas close to employment, services, and recreation. The project is partially funded by the City of Renton CDBG program, and also has received funding commitments from King County, Washington State, and the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program. We appreciate your review of this project, and hope that you will approve these requests. If you have any questions during the review process,please do not hesitate to call Stephanie Durman, the project manager, at 328-5648 or Susan Petrus, the project architect, at 624-7880. Sincerely, potU n s_ r L jy.._ _ Paul D. Purcell : EC IVFr) Vice President �'° � R 0 1997 UEV-LopmEN P CITY OF Rey ONMNG I QA United Way Agency Burnett Ave. Family Housing Attachments 1. Master Application 2. Environmental Checklist 3. Mailing Labels 4. List of Current Property Owners 5. Legal Documents -N/A-none are required 6. Fees 7. Project Narrative 8. Construction Mitigation Description 9. Neighborhood Detail Map 10. Site Plan 11. Grading Plan- waived 12. Generalized Utility Plan 13. Drainage Plan-waived 14. Drainage Report -modified 15. Geotechnical Report 16. Landscaping Plan 17. Architectural Elevations 18. Floor Plans 19. Tree Cutting/Land Clearing 20. Plan Reductions • 21. Colored Display Maps 22. Justification for Variance Request 6 y L, CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 11, 1997 • Mr. Mike Moedritzer Tonkin/Hoyne/Lokan 204 First Avenue South Seattle, WA 98104 Subject: BURNETT AVENUE FAMILY REQUEST FOR A DEVIATION OF THE PARKING AND LOADING ORDINANCE STANDARDS Dear Mr. Moedritzer: I received and reviewed your revised February 3, 1997 request for consideration and approval for a deviation in the parking standards established in the City of Renton Parking and Loading code, as amended by Ordinance No. 4517. Reference made to the code in the following evaluation shall be taken to denote the City of Renton Parking and Loading Code. BACKGROUND A project has been proposed to develop multi-family housing at 633 Burnett Avenue South. The proponent has requested a deviation of the parking standards to allow less parking than is required by the Parking and Loading Ordinance. Section 4-14-8A1c. of the Parking and Loading Ordinance requires 1.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit and Section 4-14-8A1 d: requires one guest parking space for every four dwelling units for a total of 1.75 spaces per dwelling unit. The proposed plan for this project would require 11 parking spaces. The proposal calls,for 10 spaces, or 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit plus one space for visitor parking. The proposal therefore provides one less parking space than is required by the Parking and Loading Ordinance. SUMMARY OF REQUEST The proponent is requesting a deviation from the standards of the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to develop multi-family housing at the desired density. The proposed housing will be built for low income families. The proponent contends that low-income residents living in this type of project will not own as many cars and will have a higher rate of transit usage, therefore, there is less of a need for parking as compared to higher income apartment projects. The applicant has submitted anecdotal information based upon observations of other similar facilities to support this contention. • The proponent also indicates that the proposed project will be situated close to service oriented commercial uses that would promote pedestrian and bicycle use and that the projects will be well served by Metro. FINDINGS 1. Parking and Loading Section 4-14-1.C.1.a states: Approval for deviation from standards: Whenever there are practical difficulties in carrying out the provisions of this chapter, the Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator may grant in writing modifications to the standards for individual cases, provided that such modifications: Conforms to the intent and purpose of the Code; and can be shown to be justified and required for the use and the situation intended; and will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity; and will bp.opg.skAprior to detailed engineering and design. MAY 3 0 1997 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Burnett Avenue Family Housing Administrative Decision 3/11/97 Page 2 2. The proposed site plan is not able to accommodate the required parking. The proponent claims that the proposed project will have less of a demand for parking than higher income projects. 3. The proposed 6 unit housing project located on Burnett Avenue South would provide 1 less space than what is required by the Parking and Loading Ordinance. 4. The request has been made prior to submittal of detailed' 'engineering and design drawings. The conditions stated in the Code for approval for deviation.from standards have been met. DISCUSSION One of the important purposes of the Parking and Loading Ordinance is to require proposed development projects to provide sufficient on-site parking spaces so as not to create undue demands on a limited supply of street parking spaces. !t is intended that projects be designed such that the criteria for on-site parking can be met. Options for meeting these criteria can include creative layout of parking stalls or adjustments in dwelling unit counts. Introduction of vehicles using street parking or other off-site parking options due to provision of insufficient on-site parking spaces can create adverse impacts to other property in the neighborhood and does not conform to the intent and purpose of the Code. The applicant has made modifications to the site plan that has yielded an additional parking on-site parking space, and has provided anecdotal information to support the contention that the lower income residents that will occupy this facility require fewer parking spaces than are required by typical residents of multi- family residences. It is the opinion of the reviewer that the revised site plan conforms to the intent and purpose of the Code, and will not create adverse impacts to other propert(ies) in the vicinity. DECISION Upon reconsideration, the request for a deviation from standards to provide fewer on-site parking spaces for the revised Burnett Avenue Family Housing Project than is called for in the Parking and Loading Ordinance is hereby approved. The applicant should note that this project is in the RM-U zone. City Code 4-31-8.D.11 requires parking to be provided in either underground parking or parking structures, unless through the site plan review process it is determined that due to environmental or physical site constraints, surface or under building parking should be allowed. Sincerely, IS Gregg Zim , Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works h:div/DS/devpin/JH/Burnpkg cc: Mark Pywell/Development Planning " DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISIO: WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USEpERMIrSUBMITTAL7':':: WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS . . . . . REQUIREMENTS ..... ....... BY .......................... . . Calculations, Survey, Drainage Control Plan.....:................... ...... . Drainage Report 2 ro.ov>inei> Liirth.e.DaeSS Atz VE--9-LOM ........... ................... ..... ..... Elevations ArchitecturaI3ANo4 Elevations, Grading 2 Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)4 Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Flood Plain Map if applicable 4 .:11:16:01.1.111 • Floor Plans 3 AND 4 . . . . . . . ..... ...... . ........................... ................................ .......................................................... Grading Plan, Conceptual 2Grading Plan Detailed 2 )4.3 • King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 Landscaping Plan, ConceptuaI4 Legal Description 4 .• • •• •••.••••.• . •• • ••••••••• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ••••••••• SurroundingList of Property Owners 4 Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 N.60 of Existing Site CoflditiOri54 Master Application Form 4 • -•• • .. ••.• •.. Mohurnent.!Cards:(9no:;prjipbn004),.,..: :•••• Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 .. ......................... ........................................ ....................... ....... P l*.1:1:Reductions.(PMTS)....4:.. Postage 4 . Public Works Approval Letter 2 • Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 Topography Map (5' contours)3 • • ................................................ . Traffic Study 2 LV-.5 • •• •, Tree CuttingNegetation Clearing Plan 4 . ••...... •••:•:••••.:•:••• •:::::•:•:••••••••••••••,..:••••:••••:••••••• :••••:•:•••••: . • •„.• Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 . . ..... ........... . •. ........................ . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . Wetlands Delihealidn:::M00 Wetlands Planting Plan 4 . Wetlands Study 4 4pr .. • This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: gt,f/fge// 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: 4. Development Planning Section h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xls 7. Project Narrative Burnett Ave. Family Housing Summary: The Archdiocesan Housing Authority(AHA) and Catholic Community Services (CCS)propose to develop and manage 6 units of affordable housing for low-income and formerly homeless families at 633 Burnett Avenue South. Per an administrative approval, parking for ten cars will be provided. The building will be three stories tall, and its highest point is 35' 51/2" above ground. Three of the units will serve formerly homeless families with incomes between 0%-30% of median and three will serve families with incomes between 0%- 50%. The owner is the CCS/Renton Housing Limited Partnership, of which AHA is the general partner. Site Information: The property is an irregularly shaped lot with an area of 7,381 square feet. The property is bordered on the west by Smithers Avenue South, on the south by South Seventh Street, and on the east by Burnett Avenue South,which runs diagonally to the northeast. The site is approximately 114 feet long on the north border, 105 feet long.on the east, 56 feet wide on the south, and 87 feet long on the west. The site is currently bare land with no improvements. Our understanding is that there was previously a single family house on the site which was demolished. City Approvals Requested: Surface Parking-Per Section 11: Parking, RM-U zoning district,we request that surface parking be allowed at the site due to environmental and physical site constraints. The soils report indicates that the ground water level in February, 1997 was at 3 to 3.5 feet below the ground. This makes it financially infeasible for us to provide subsurface parking. Also, protection of the City of Renton's aquifer dictates that we not build parking below ground. Front and Rear Yard Setbacks -Per Section D.4.a.1.: Development Standards, RM-U zoning district,with the orientation of the site being Smithers Ave. and Burnett Ave. as front and rear yards respectively, we request that the minimum front and rear year setbacks be reduced to zero feet (0'). We propose to provide the residential amenity of private balconies for each dwelling unit. Lot Coverage -Per Section 9.c.: Lot Coverage, in coordination with our request to provide surface parking,we request an administrative variance from the maximum impervious surface coverage of 75%. Special Site Features: This site has several unique features which limit our ability to develop the project without the requested approvals. First, the high water table at 3-3.5 feet below ground is a constraint on development of the site. Second, the site is irregularly shaped as described above. Burnett Avenue cuts through the east side at an angle such that the south end of the site is substantially smaller than the north end. This irregular shape was exacerbated by a recent deeding of the eastern portion of the lot to the City of Renton for sidewalk reallignment. Within the neighborhood, the Kroll map shows no comparable lots. Specifically, there are no other multifamily-zoned, irregularly shaped, corner lots with streets on three sides. RECEIVED 3 0 1997 _.vb Lc)-MENTPLANNING CITY OF RENTON Tonkin / Hoyne / Lokan ARCHITECTURE&URBAN DESIGN Leslie Provenzano Tonkin Barry S.Hoyne Kim D.Lokan • CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION For the Proposed Development at 633 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington • Proposed construction dates: September, 1997—May 1998 • Hours of operation: 7:30am—6pm on non-holiday weekdays • Proposed hauling/transportation routes: Site has direct arterial access to Highway 405 and Interstate 5. Materials will not need to be transported on residential streets. • Measures to be taken to minimize dust, traffic, mud, noise, etc.: The Civil Engineer will design an erosion control plan with check dams and filter fabric at the perimeter of the site, as required, in order to minimize the impact due to construction on the City's storm drain system. All other typical preventative measures, such as wetting the site and construction debris when dusty and keeping the street clean of construction debris, will be taken to ensure a construction site respectful of neighboring properties. 204 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH SEA 1 1'LE,WASHINGTON 98104 (206)624-7880 Fax 622-1766 22.Justification for Variance Request Burnett Ave. Family Housing We are requesting a variance to permit us to exceed 75% lot coverage. Specifically, we are requesting permission to have 6,133 square feet of impervious surface on a 7,381 square foot lot, yielding an 83% lot coverage. Our request for the lot coverage variance is driven by the need to provide surface parking,which is permitted in the RM-U zone through the site plan review process. The building itself covers less than a third of the lot,but we are required to provide ten parking spaces (a reduction of one space per administrative approval). Unfortunately, we are not able to provide these spaces below ground because of the high water table on the property. Our soils survey conducted in February, 1997 indicated that ground water was found at depths of 3- 3.5 feet below the existing ground level. There is no economically feasible way for us to provide this parking beneath the building given the high water table. Furthermore, the site is too small to allow for other parking solutions besides surface parking. The irregular shape of the site also limits our ability to satisfy the 75% lot coverage limit. The lot tapers substantially on the east side, a situation which exacerbated by the deeding over of a portion of the lot to the City of Renton for sidewalk improvements. The lot is also located on a corner,bordered by public streets on three sides. The buildable area within the odd-shaped lot is substantially restricted by zoning setbacks. This lot configuration and location severely limit the possible site planning solutions for the building and parking, leaving us no room to meet both the lot coverage and parking requirements. Moreover,these issues are specific to this site. Within the neighborhood, the Kroll map shows no comparable lots. Specifically, there are no other multifamily-zoned, irregularly shaped, corner lots with streets on three sides. We believe that the denial of the requested variance would impose an undue hardship. Without the variance,we would need to reduce the number of units in order to reduce the number of parking spaces and therefore the lot coverage. Unfortunately, this is not economically feasible because our funding commitments from King County, Washington State Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development, City of Renton, and the Washington State Housing Finance Commission all require that we provide six units of affordable housing. Also, the reduction in efficiency of scale in constructing and operating a smaller project would raise the per unit cost, rendering the project infeasible as affordable housing. Finally, such a reduction in the number of units would be inconsistent with the intent of the RM-U zoning of the lot which calls for high-density multifamily housing. Granting of this variance would not have a negative impact to the public welfare or to neighboring properties. Within the constraints described above, we have minimized the lot coverage to the greatest extent possible. The variance would allow less than six hundred square feet of additional impervious surface beyond the 75% threshold, and would thus have no discernible impact on surface water runoff. We will provide fencing and landscaping to screen the parking from the view of neighbors. The project itself will serve a public purpose by providing high-density affordable housing for Renton families within the urban core, which is consistent with comprehensive plan policies under the Growth Management Act. Environmental Checklist A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project,if applicable: Burnett Ave. Family Housing 633 Burnett Ave. S. 2. Name of applicant: CCS/Renton Housing Limited Partnership 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: • Stephanie Durman� CCSWW, 100-23rd Ave. S. , Seattle, WA 98144 (206)328-5648 4. Date checklist prepared: 5/29/97 5. Agency requesting checldist: City of Renton Planning, Building & PUblic Works. 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable): Apply for site plan approval/variance - May, 1997 Apply for building permit - July, 1997 Begin Construction - September, 1997 7. Do you have any plans for future additions,expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes,explain. NO 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared,or will be prepared,directly related to this proposal. Phase I Environmental-Assessment, Nowicki & Associates, 11/9/95 Geotechnical Report, GeoEngineers, 3/11/97 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes explain. We are simultaneously applying for site plan approval and a variance request. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Site plan approval , variance, building permit, parking waiver. 11. Give brief complete description of your proposal,including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. Construction of six unit multi-family housing with surface parking for ten vehicles. The hsouing is arranged in one, three-storey buil i RFCEIVID MN 3 0 1997 2 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON Environmental Checklist 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project,including a street address,if any,and section,township,and • range,if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,provide the range or boundaries of the sitc(s). Provide a legal description,site plan,vicinity map,and topographic map,if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you arc not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Address: 633 Burnett Ave. S. Legal Description: See Attached B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site(circle one) rolling,hilly,steep slopes,mountainous, other: b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? 0% c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example,clay,sand,gravel,peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify them and note any prime farmland. The soils includede interbedded fine-grained alluvial deposits with some zones of organic material . The upper portion of the alluvium is loos/soft with the sil and organic zones compressible. Underlying deposits (35 feet deep) is sand. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? if so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose,type,and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. We will be reuired to provide structural fill below the building to support the footings. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so,generally describe. No, due to the flat site. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example,asphalt or buildings)? We are requesting a variance to allow 83% lot coverage. 3 Environmental Checklist h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth,if any. We will do excavation/backfill during dry times if possible. 2. AIR a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e.,dust,automobile, odors,industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. - Construction equipment emissions b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any: - provide landscaping (shrubs/trees) to help freshen air - if soils work creates too much dust, wet teh affected area as needed to keep dust down 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year-round and seasonal streams.saltwater,lakes,ponds,wetlands)? If yes,describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. No. • 2) Will the project require any work over,in,or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so,note location on the site plan. No. 4 Environmental Checklist 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description,purpose and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources,if any(for example: Domestic sewage;industrial,containing the following chemicals. . .;agricultural;etc.). Describe the general size of the system. the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served(if applicable).or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): t) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal,if any(include quantities.if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so.describe. All gutters and perimeter drains to be tight-linedtto storm sewer system. Yard drains, patio drains and cathcbasins will be lcoated at atll impervious surfaces and lawn areas. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe. If required, oil separators will be provided in parking areas to prevent parking lot oils from entering storm sewer system. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground or runoff water impacts, if any: 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: x deciduous tree:alder,maple,aspen,other- evergreen tree: fir,cplar,pine,other x shrubs X grass —pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail,buttercup.bulrush,skunk cabbage,other _water plants: water lily,eelgrass.milfoil,other x other types of vegetation - Scot's Broom b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All vegetation will be removed, . 5 Environmental Checklist c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or rear the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping.use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,if any: Landscaping will include Vine Maple, flowering pear, Japanese Snowbell , sal al , Oregon Grape, St. John' s Wort, and Cascade Mahonia. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: (see next page) Birds: hawk heron,eagle,songbirds,other. House Sparrow. European Starling Mammals: deer,bear,elk,beaver,other: none Fish: bass,salmon,trout,herring,shellfish.other: none b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site: None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any: Site will be landscaped with shrubs/trees to provide cover for birds. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy(electric,natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,etc. The project will have electric heat and hot water. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. The project would affect the location of solar panels, but not the potential ability to utilize solar power. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any: = low wattage site lights - low energy appliances • - insulated per code requirements for electric heat 6 Environmental Checklist 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards,including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk of fire and explosion.spill,or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,describe. None. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,if any: N/A b. Noise • 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example: traffic,equipment operation,other)? Traffic noise. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis(for example: traffic,construction,operation,other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from site. Long term - traffice Short term - construction equipment noise 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any: Short term - Limit construction activity to daylight hours and not before 7 am. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The ,ite is currently bare land. Site to the north is a' single family. home. Site to the west is a single family home. Site to the west is a City Park. b. 1as the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? RM-U • £ What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? CD 7 Environmental Checklist g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? . N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an"environmentally sensitive"area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? approximately 18 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 0 - the site is vacant k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any: n/a 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and project land uses and plans, if any. The project is designed to give the appearance of a larger house rather than apartments. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided,if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. This will provide 6 units of housing for low-income people. b. Approximately how many units, if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle,or low-income housing. none c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any: n/a 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building matcrial(s)proposed? 35' 5.5";. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The adjacent site to the north will have less of a view of the commercial areas to the south. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any: The project is designed to be aesthetically attractive. . I • Environmental Checklist 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Site lighting will be on after dark. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. Light will be directed withing property lines and away from windows. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any: Light will be directed within property lines and away from windows. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The site is across the street from the Linnear Park. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. no. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant,if any: n/a 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Arc there any places or objects listed on,or proposed for,national,state,or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so.generally describe. no b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological,scientific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. none c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any: n/a 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site,and describe the proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans,if any. Adjacent streets are Burnett Ave. S. , Smithers Ave. South, and • South 7th Street. Site access is from Burnett Ave. S. 9 Environmental Checklist b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The site is located in downtown Renton, and has easy access to bus service at the Renton Transit Center, located four blocks from the site. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The project will have ten parking spaces. None will be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to existing roads or streets,not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private). no • e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity ot)water,rail,or air transportation? If so,generally describe. no f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Unknown. However, excellent transit, bicycle and pedestrian connections exist to downtown Renton shopping and employment centers. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any. none 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example: fire protection,police protection,health care,schools,other)? If so,generally describe. Yes, there would be an increased need for all public services listed. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any. 1 . Transportation alternatives will reduce automobile traffic. 2. The-:building will be fully sprinkled. 16. UTILITIES • - a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. available in adjacent streets • 10 Environmental Checklist b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service,and the general construction activities on the site or in immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electric Service - Puget Sound Energy Water/Sewer - City of Renton Phone - U.S. West Construction - trenching for power/cable/water/sewer lines installation of storm water drainage system C. SIGNATURE I,the undersigned,state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation willfullack of full disclosure on my part. 11 ✓ �o Proponent: V O- 9.jIJ Name Printed: Paul D. Purcell, Vice President of Archdiocesan Housing Authority General Partner of CCS/Renton Housing Limited Partnership Date: 5/29/97 • 11 Order No . 292622 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the. county of King, state of Washington, and described as follows : Beginning at a point 550 . 72 feet west and 16 feet north of the corner common to Sections 17, 18, 19 and 20, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County,. Washington, said distance being measured along and at right angles to the line between Sections 18 and 19; thence north 86 . 95 feet; thence east 115 feet, more or less, to the west line of Burnett • Street; thence southwesterly along the curve of said street to a point 16 feet north of the south line of said Section 18 ; ' thence west 67 . 95 feet to the point of beginning; (BEING KNOWN AS Lot 10, Wood' s Addition to the City of Renton, according to the unrecorded plat thereof) . EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the City of Renton by deed recorded November 13 , 1995 under King County Recording Number 9511130944 . END OF SCHEDULE A TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT FOR SMITHERS AVENUE FAMILY HOUSING • LOCATED AT 633 Burnett Ave. S., Renton, WA FOR TONKIN/HOYNE/LOKAN BY BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. CERiEn ' 2009 MINOR AVENUE EAST N, ; 1997 SEATTLE, WA 98102 (206) 323-4144 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON BRH JOB NO. 97158.00 May 30, 1997 �.~cD.CUB L WA.sf.. r ' A.:411 lir is t 71 rM • ,,�28328 ° . ,..< 57397 !EXPIRES 12/17/ 78' I. PROJECT OVERVIEW & LEVEL ONE DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS This site is approximately 7,640 sf in size. It is undeveloped and overgrown with grasses and a few trees. There is existing development surrounding the site. The project will consist of developing the site with a single three story building which will provide a 6-plex of multifamily housing and associated onsite parking. Drainage will be collected onsite and discharged to an existing catch basin in Burnett Ave. S., just' north of S. Seventh St. The existing catch basin connects to a 24" CMP trunkline in S. Seventh St. This is an urban area with extensive underground drainage system. The underground trunk line continues westerly along S. Seventh St. through the 24" CMP for approximately 1,062 feet to a manhole at S. Seventh St. and Shattuck Ave. Drainage continues over another 300 feet in 30" CMP to complete the quarter mile downstream analysis. I^ - ,a e , 11 • ' vs a ,are-1 =T tale-e dR-a I 1 if _ 1arY1. N AV ,aEhu �`.� 7 taLa-. .. ••• zza..— 6„_,. --__. __________ IN � ,h, FliA r`• ale rf? IaW-7at �._• arhwtaCat • S 3Ro _s ST Ialas-s Lpw{_i aftc ♦ `' `'`i fat{-n I - 6•E6-11 �{ ' - I • era-,. 116.r..6-3 /Aria/ tazhis• ,aEhie _i• 1 I M 1 N 1 I • ,vhs� II 11 • aEa-ta 1 I • ` '� �oa-1?-- tar{-u I I _ 1 11411 / ,/`� ,va-1e law. • lar{-.•' Iasi I `J�� L. C \ IaLh17' 416-3 IaL7�e/ �� , \ \ lar.,_7 \7-1111 ,ar)-t J--- IafA-, ,aN7-1, aM-; -f ['con-i• . ' I 1v�r �.o4lain-,s ftfilr/ cco,o, 14.07-6 \ \ .--6_7-.4 sar ,� \\ `,\ /.** \ ;\ - far I` I ' i•J rI-a- \ \ iIar7-.0 w7-7K. IaK7i `g J.. . 16.C7i i) •J+.o i�__� \ v7-a\ Iar?-la ,1G7-c ,w7-,• ��� • • �(nl1 L`� iao7-./-,/-,. -- - - 'ar7'1 •, •-14 j ! -r-, '4N)-1 7a M, i I I 'f� _ i I taeea Iv7-, "a7 a 'u7 s 71:11...311 If I 1 it—A/ --fao7-a j` Iiii ititzik / ,are s ,u.� _-------------.- l' , 1 ' r 1f.M-1 11 1a[e a late-» tar.u. �_� L ' ±L1 ) o- --, ,ace-1o/ \ \ Ive-7� � • S eT►1 ST Puw-e � ehn I � 14r6-17 r— �,;;:fs=. � 1 fJ I ._� lase-u i16/111-16 i I IS(e7� I �--�N I l/�I haLh7 14Ee4 tar.-s / I -+ I (' l • / ,ve-u ,ate-pwu' •" II � � �J j ,a.w-a S ? - lan-. lase-S taDe-. I laze-a;,• lazhia ,fete-u / , I —tiro— • _ Iat1e't1 IaU_t._�/ • "If" VMMUMMEW �r►I • . Vacs i .-1 ve a s--- _ U i 1�ac�� �` r --\'s \ \ Ia1M-a fate-.✓ 1 IaE1_17 laze-Is ,ar -fs S ST ._. - . /lane'{{ _ ,u -le f f • 'SHEET 16 iv DISCLAIMER The inventory information for the storm drainage system was compiled from numerous sources and is the best information available at this time and or SHEET 16 should be used only for General guidance. The City of Renton is not responsible for errors or omissions when this is used for engineering purposes. MANHOLE AND OUTLET PIPE INVENTORY Designers are to field verify this information. HYDRAULIC GRATE GRATE PIPE PIPE MAPPINGS DWNSTRM. PLAN PIPE PIPE AREA PIPE CAPACITY RADIUS STRUCTURE INDEX 1 TYPE C8 7 ELEV. UPPER IC LOWER IE TYPE 0/N SEP. OIAN TYPE LENGTH N STRUC. FILE SLOPE(%) (FT-2) ICES) (FT.I MH 16,87-3 2 Y 33.78 26.8 26 C N 12 CMP 200 0.024 16,111-4 3-1-67 0.400 0.7854 1.22 0.2500 MH 16,87-4 2 Y 32.41 26 25.02 C N 12 CMP 245 0.024 16,H7-1 3-1-67 PH 16,87-6 2-60 _ Y 28.4 24.92 24.84 1 I' 0.533 0.3 0.48 0. B CMP 1S 0.011 16,N1-7 17-3-l25 0.533 0.3491 O.i91 B 0.16676 NH 16,H7-9 2-48 Y 27.6 23.)3 21.77 C N 12 - 310 - 16,GI-1 - 17-3-125 0.406 0.7854 ERR 0.2500 MH 16,118-1 2 Y 27.7 23 21.16 C N 18 CMP 87 0.024 16.88-2 3-1-63 MH 16,88-2 2 Y 27.4 20.66 19.83 C N0.115 3.141 8.301 0.5000 24 CMP 218 0.02/ 16,N8-3 3-1-63 0.299- 3.1416 6.71 0.5000 MN 16,118-3 2 Y 25.7 19.83 19.21 C N 24 CMP 205 0.024 16.88-4 3-1-63 0.302 3.1416 6.76 0.5000 PH 16,88-4 2 Y - 18.71 18.57 C N 24 CMP 79 0.024 16,148-7 4-1-132 0.177 3.1416 5.17 0.5000 MH 16,118-5 2-48 Y 23.8 20.22 19.57 C N 12 CC 300 0.012 16,68-2 4-1-117 MH 16,88-6 2-48 Y 26.2 18.71 18.57 S - N0.217 0.7854 5.17. 7 0.5000 24 CMP 79 0.024 16,H8-/ 4-1-132 0.1T7 3.141 6 0.5000 MH 16,118-7 2-54 Y - 18.57 17.68 C - N 24 CMP 509 0.024 16,G8-1 4-1-132 0.17S 3.1416 5.14 0.5000 MH 16,88-8 2 Y - - - C N 24 CC - 0.012 16,18-6 ERR 3.1416 ERR 0.5000 MH 16,88-9 VAULT Y - - - C N 24 CC - 0.012 16,88-8 - ERR 3.1416 ERA 0.5000 NH 17,18-1 2-48 Y 21.35 13 14.91 C N 24 CMP 491 0.024 16,18-2 4-1-109 0.222 3.1416 5.79 0.5000pm NM 18,07-3 2-48 Y 25.52 20.4 19.1 - N 24- - 300 16,07-4 1-3-210 0.433 3.1416 ERR 0.5000 s t r • • Alk y `, �,. DISCLAIMER The inventory information for the storm drainage system was compiled from f numerous sources and is the best information available at this time and should be used only for General guidance. The City of Renton is not SHEET 16 responsible for errors or omissions when this is used for engineering purposes. , Designers are to field verify this information. . MANHOLE AND OUTLET PIPE INVENTORY HYDRAULIC GRATE GRATE PIPE PIPE MANNINGS DMMSTRM. PLAN PIPE PIPE AREA PIPE CAPACITY RADIUS STRUCTURE INDEX I TYPE C8 ? ELEV. UPPER IE LOWER IE TYPE 0/M SEP. DIAM TYPE LENGTH N STRUC. FILE SLOPE(%) (1T-2) (CFS) (FT.) NH 16,65-5 2 Y 29.1 24.97 23.83 - N - CC 285 0.012 16.65-4 F8 340 0.400 0.0000 ERR ERR . MH 16,65-7 2 Y - - - C N - - - - 16,66-7 3-1-614 ERR 0.0000 ERR ERR _MH 16,G6-1 2 Y - = - C M 12 - - - 16.66-2 12-2 ERR 0.7854 ERR 0.2500- MN 16,66-2 2 Y - - - C N 12 - - - 16,F6-6 12-2 ERR 0.7854 ERR 0.2500 MH 16,66-3 2 Y - - - C N 6 - - - 16,65-6 4-1-311 ERR 0.1963 ERR 0.1250 NH 16,66-4 2 Y - - - C I 6 CC - 0.012 16,66-3 4-1-305 ERR 0.1963 ERR 0.1250 MH 16,66-5 2 Y - - - - I - - - - 16,66-6 4-1-142 ERR 0.0000 ERR ERR . MH 16,66-6 2 Y - - - C N 8 - - - 16,66-7 4-1-142 ERR 0.3491 ERR 0.1667 MH 16,66-7 2 Y - - - C N 10 - - 16,65-6 3-1-614 - ERR 0.5454 ERR 0.2083 _ MH ' 16,67-1 2 Y - 21.77 20.42 C N 12 - _ 290 - 16,68-6 3-1-605 - 0.466 0.7854 ERR 0.2500 •- _ MH 16,67-2 2 Y - - - C N 8 CC - 0.012 16,67-3 - ERR 0.3491 ERR 0.1667 NH 16,67-3 2 Y - - - C N 8 CC - 0.012 16,17-17 - ERR 0.3491 ERR 0.1667 MH 16,68-1 2-54 Y - 17.68 - C N 24 CMP - 0.024 T INTO PIPE 4-1-132 ERR 3.1416 ERR 0.5000 a 101 16,68-1 2-48 Y 22.4 17.68 16.38 C N 24 CMP 553 0.024 16,18-I 4-1-104 0.235 3.1416 5.96 0.5000 MM 16,68-2 2-48 Y 23.4 19.57 18.87 C N 12 CC 310 0.012 16,68-3 4-1-117 0.226 0.7854 1.84 0.2500 NH 16,68-3 2-48 Y 22.7 18.87 18.49 C N 12 CC 165 0.012 16,68-4 4-1-117 0.230 0.7854 1.86 0.2500 dr, MN 16,68-4 2-48 Y 22.4 18.49 17.67 C N 12 CC - 95 0.012 16,18-2 4-1-117 0.863 0.7854 3.60 0.2500 MH 16,68-6 2 Y - 20.42 19.57 C N 12 - 245 - 16,68-2 3-1-605 0.347 0.7854 ERR 0.2500 MH 16,H2-1 2-48 Y 28.46 24.3 22.1 S N 12 CC 292 0.012 16,H3-1 1-3-5 0.753 0.7854 3.36 0.2500 0.4 NH 16,83-2 2-48 Y 32.73 16 15 C N 12 CC 75 0.012 OUT 1-3-5 1.333 0.7854 4.47 0.2500 MH 16,N3-3 2 Y - - 20.18- C N 24 CC - 0.012 16,113-5 1-2-7 - ERR 3.1416 ERR 0.5000 MH 16,83-4 2 Y - 24.73 17.85 C N 12 CC 311 0.012 16,83-5 1-2-7 2.212 0.7854 5.76 0.2500 -, MH 16,H3-5 2 Y - 16 15 C M 24 CC 65 0.012 OUT 1-2-7 1.538 3.1416 30.48 0.5000 MH 16,H3-7 2-48 Y - 16 15 . - N 12 CC 95 0.012 OUT 1-2-1 1.053 0.7854 3.97 0.2500 • MM . 16,113-7 2 Y - 20.91 - - N 24 CC - 0.012 16,N3-3 1-2-1 ERR 3.1416 ERR 0.5000 , MN 16,114-1 2-48 Y 31.27 23.88 22.06 _C N 24 CC 321 -0.012 1014-2 4-1-103 0.567 3.1416 18.50 0.5000 - - ' KM 16,84-2 2-48 Y 29.97 22.06 21.17 C N 24 CC 369 0.012 16,84-3 4-1-103 0.241 -3.1416 12.07 0.5000 MN 16,H4-3 2-48 Y 30.5 21.17 - C N 24 CC - 0.012 16,N3-6 1-2-7 ERR 3.1416 ERR 0.5000 ,, _.-,, MN 16,N5-1 2748_ Y -. 35.29 28.97 28.08 C - N 21 CC 287 0.012 16,115-2 - 4-1-103 0.310 2.4053_ 9.58 0.4375 - . ' 't l- - MN ` 16,H5-2 2-48 Y 33.15 28.08 25.15 C N 21 CC {- 452 0.012 16,85-3 4-1-103 - - 0.648 2.4053 - 11.86 0.4375 MH 16,85-3 2-48 Y 31.91 25.15 23.88 C - N 24 CC 168 0.012 16,114-1 4-1-103 0.756 3.1416 21.37 0.5000 y NIl 16,116-1 2-48 Y 35.44 31.28 31.18 C N 12 CC - 27 0.012 16,86-2 4-1-103 0.370 0.7854 2.36 0.2500 - -MN 16,16-2 2-48 Y 34.88 31.18 29.12 C M 12 CC 454 0.012 16,N5-1 4-1-103 0.454 0.7854 2.61 0.2506 �• MN 16,N .6-3 2 Y - - - C N 8 Ct - 0.012 16,87-10 12-2 ERR 0.3491 ERR 0.1667 u MN 16,86-4 2 Y - .- - C M 8 CC - 0.012 16,87-18 12-2 ERR 0.3491 ERA 0.1667 ' MN 16,86-5 2 7 - - - C N 8 - - . - 16,66-7 3-1-65 ERR 0.3491 ERR 0.1667 , - -' MN 16,111-1 2 Y 30.65 24.52 23 C M 18 CMP 430 0.024 16,88-1 3-1-63 0.353 1.7671 3.39 0.3750 it- -``, NH 16,87-10 -2-4$ V 34.49 29.89 29 C N 8 CC 75 0.012 16,87-11 17-3-30 • 1.187 - 0.3441 1.43. 0.1667 • - ,1 MM 16,87-11 2-48 `._T• 34.49 29.19 28,7 C M 8 CC Ip'�'-_2E 0.012 16,N7-2 17-3-30 1.750 0.3491 1.74 0.1667 - - - • . - h ''-' IlI 16,K7-12 2-48. V •- ... - - V 8 CMP -�' . 45 0.024 16,87-2 17-3-30 0.000 0.3491 - 0.00 0.1667 M, KM 16,117-14 2-54 Y 34.06 31.08 30.7 C Y 8 CMP • 38 0.024 16,87-11 17-3-30 1.000 0.3491 0.66 0.1667 - NI 16,87-17 2 Y- - 24.15 23.03 . C M 12 - - 295 - 16,87-20 3-1-605 0.380 0.7854 ERR 0.2500 11 16,M1-18 2 :'V - - - C M 12 - - 16,87-19 12-2 ERR 0.7854 ERR 0.2500 . I ,,a,.:;;,",MI 16,87-19 211 .V - - . - - C N 12 - ' - 16,66-1 12-2 ERR 0.7854 ERR 0.2500 1•:' MI 16,87;2 2 -:V ,;:33 77 26.66 26.42 C - I 12 CRP 62 0.024 16,87-3 3-1-67 0.387 0.7854 1.20 0.2500 - . - A-.1-'MM_ 16,I7-20 " 2•`'V - - C I 12 CC 0.012 16,87-21 - ERR 0.7854 ERR 0.2500 _ i u N7-7I 4 :.V'•: - • - C 1 12 CC - - 0.012 16,67-9 - ERR 0.7854 ERR 0.2500 '-, 'f DISCLAIMER The inventory information for the storm drainage system was compiled from numerous sources and is the best information available at this time and w- SHEET 16 should be used only for General guidance. The City of Renton is not responsible for errors or omissions when this is used for engineering purposes. MANHOLE AND OUTLET PIPE INVENTORY Designers are to field verify this information. " GRATE GRATE HYDRAULIC STRUCTURE INDEX I TYPE C8 7 ELEV. UPPER If LOWER If TYPE 0/N SEP. DIAM TYPE LENGTHMANNNNGS DSTRUC. FILE SLOPE(%)WNSTRM. PLAN PIPE PIPE PIPE CAPACITY R(FT .. T..)) RH 16,F5-13 2 Y 26.86 15.4 - - - CC - 0.012 16,F5-1 F8 340 (F N ERR 0.0000 ERR ERR MN 16,F5 14 2 N C N MN 16,F5-1 2 YN 12 CC - 0.012 16,F6-10 - ERR 0.7854 ERR 0.2500 _ T C N 24 CC 0.012 16,F6 1 11 3 31 ERR 3.1116 ERR MN 16,F5 2 2 Y 26.86 15. C N 24 CC - 0.5000 MN 16,F5-3 2-48 Y 26.03 17.6 1- C N 0.012 16,i5-16 17-1-7 ERR 3.1416 ERR 0.5000 MH 16,F5-6 2-48 Y 25.4 117.6 17.97. S N 18 CC 85 0.012 16,f5-9 3-1-551 0.118 1.7671 3.91 0.3750 15 CMP 170 0.024 16,15-10 3-1-551 0.112 1.2272 1.17 0.3125 MH 16,F5-7 2-48 Y 25.8 17.81 17.69 C N 1S CMP 27 0.024 16,15-3 3-1-551 0.444 1.2272 2.34 0.3125 MH 16,F5-B 2 Y 32.96 28.46 - S N 18 CC 190 0.012 _16,f5-9 11-1-1 MN 16,F5 9 2 Y C N 0.000 1.7611 0.00 0.3750 MN 116,1 l0 2 N - 24 CC 0.012 16,f5 1 11 1 1 ERR 3.1416 _ ERR 0.5000 C I 12 CC 0.012 16,f6-13 ERR 0.7854 ERR t NH 16,f6 11 2 Y S N 12 CC 0.2500 A Mil 16,f6 13 2 N - 0.012 16,E6 13 ERR 0.165/ ERR 0 2500 MN 16,f6 14 2 N - - C C N 12 CC 0.012 16,F6 14 ERR 0.1854 ERR 0.2500 MH 6,f6-14 1 S2 Y 21.31 18.7/ 18.11 C N 12 CC - 0.012 16,F6-5 - ERR 0.1854 ERR 0.2500 12 CC 260 0.012 16,16 6 3 1 SOl 0.219 0.7854 1.61 0.1500 ow RH 16,16-6 2-54 Y 26.09 18.17 18.17 C M 12 CC 12 0.012 16,11-1 3-1-501 0.000 0.7854 0.00 MN 16,16-7 2-54 Y 21.8 16 15 S N 8 CC 300 0.012 16,16-8 4-1-1110.1667 0.333 . MH 16,16-8 2-54 Y 21.8 15.83 14.33 S I 0.3491 3 0.1667 8 CC 150 0.012 16,16 9 1 1 I11 1.000 0.3491 1 1.311 0.1667 am MN 16,F6-9 2-54 Y 21.9 14.13 12.63 S N 8 CC 150 0.012 16,E6-3 4-1-111� 16,F1-1 2-5/ Y 26.02 18.17 - C N l.000 0.3491 1.31 0.1667 MH 16,i7 12 2 Y 12 CC 0.012 16,F7 5 12-2 i 3-1-501 ERR 0.1854 ERR 0.2500 C N 18 CC 0.012 16,18-10 ERR 1.7671 ERR 'r MN 16,F1-17 2 y - - - C N 12 CC 0.2500 MN 16,F1 2 2-54 T 2/.11 17.46 0.012 16,f8 3 ERR 0.7851 ERR 0.2500 C N 12 CC - 0.012 16,F7-17 12-2 ERR 0.7854 ERR MN 16,17-3 2-48 Y 20.15 12.73 12.4 C N 18 CC 271.5 0.012 16,17-11 4-4-2540.2500 MN 16,17-4 2-48 T 20.6 12.82 12.73 C I 18 CC 75 0.012 16,17-3 4-4-254 0.1220 1.7671 3.95 0.3750 KH 16,f7 5 2 Y C N 0.120 1.1671 3.95 0.3750 MN 116,11-5 2 y - 18 - - - 16,f1-4 12:2 ERR 1.7671 ERR 0.3750 C N 18 16,f7 4 12:2 ERR 1.7611 ERR 0.3150 KH 16,F1 58 2 Y C N 12 - - MH 16,F - 0 2 Y 15- - - 16,F1-2 12-2 ERR 0.7854 ERR 0.2500 C I 24 CC 0.012 LIFT STA 4-4-254 ERA 3.1416 ERR 0.5000 MN 16,F8-14 2-48 Y 23.7 17.8 16.I C T WA12 - 40 16,F8 15 1 1 !19 4.000 0.185/ ERA 0.2500 '.. R: , -�;4.4 x.- MA -- 16,F8-15 2 Y 22.22 14.91 14.12 C N 30 CAP 294 0.024 16,E8-16 SW 1TN MH - 16,f8-16 2 Y - - - S N 0.269 /:9087 11.55 0.6250 MN 16,f8 17 2 y 12 CC 0.012 16,F8 17 ERR O.1B54 ERR 0.2500 S N 12 CC 0.012 16,f8 18 ERA 0.7854 ERR 0.2500 MA 16,f8 18 2 T S N_ 18 CC 0.012 16,f8 10- MN 16,f8 19A 2 Y - C N 12 CC SW 7TN 0.012 16,f8 1 ERR 1.1611 ERR 0.3750 MA 16,F8 198 2 T - C N ERR 0.1854 ERR 0.2500 MN 16,f8-2 2 /8 Y 22.0 11.67 17.03 C N 24 CC 719 0.012 16,E8 13 SA 174 0.000 3.1416 0.00 0.5000 ` 12 CC 10 0.012 16,18-3 4-1-117 0.914 0.1851 3.70 0.2500 MN 16,f8 3 2-48 T 21.7 - - N 12 CC 0.012 16,f8 7 4 1 117 ERR 0.7854 ERA 0.2500 fa 16,18-4 2-48 T 22.79 19.58 18.57 C Y 8/8 8 CAP 65 0.024 16,18-5 17-4-171 1.554 0.3491 0.82 0.1667 MN 16,F8-S 2-48 T 22,08 16.75 - C N 10 CC - 0.012 16,F8-19 17-4-171 ERR 015454 ERR 0.2083 .. 1 1IN 16,f8-7 2-48 Y 22.23 19.73 - - c N 12 CC MN 16,F8-8 2 T - - 0.012 16,f8-8 I7-3-501 EAR 0.7854 ERR 0.2500 C N 12 CC 0.012 16,181 ERR 0.1854 ERA 0.1500 w." KH 16,f8-9 2 Y - - - C N 6 CC 0.012 16,F8-B NH 16,C3-S 2 T 28.2 23.51 22.02 C N 12 CC 195 0.012 l6,C3 1 1-2-7 ERR 0.1963 ERR 0.1250 MN 16,C3-4 2 T 28.4 23.38 23 C N 0.507 0.7854 3.457 0.2500 NH16,C3 7 2 T - 12 CC 75 0.012 16,63-3 1 2-7 0.507 0.7854 2. 5 0.2500 `' 23.81 23.43 C N 12 CC 102 0.012 16,0-4 1-2-7 0.373 0,7854 2.36 0.2500 ,m MA - 16,C5-1 2 Y 29.46 26.23 25.55 C N 8 CC 170 0.012 16,G5-2 F8 340 i 4-1-103 0.400 0.3491 0.83 0.1667 I6.0 1 2 Y 28.2 23.83 13.65 - N - CC 70 0.012 16.F5-13 fl 340 0.257 0.0000 ERA ERR R DISCLAIMER The inventory information for the storm drainage system was compiled from f numerous sources and is the best information available at this time and SHEET 16 should be used only for General guidance. The City of Renton is not responsible for errors or omissions when this is used for engineering purposes. Designers are to field verify this information. MANHOLE AND OUTLET PIPE INVENTORY GRATE GRATE HYDRAULIC STRUCTURE INDEX I TYPE C8 ? ELEV. UPPER If LOWER IE TYPE 0/W SEP. DIAM TYPE LENGTH MANMMN65 OSTRUC„ FILE SLOPE(t) PIPE PIPE (FT-2) PIPE CAPACITY(CFS) RADIUS MH 16,E5-12 2 Y - - - (F1.) C N 12 CC - 0.012 16,ES-13 ERR 0.7854 ERR 0.2500 MN 16,ES-13 2 Y - - - C N 12 CC - 0.012 16,E5-14 _ ERR 0.7854 ERR 0.2500 - MN 16,E5-I4 2 Y - - - C N 18 CC - 0.012 16,E5-10 - ERR 1.7671 ERR 0.3750 MN 16,E5-2 2-48 Y 76.43 72.1: 68.8 - N 12 CMP 31 0.024 16,E5-3 4-3-356 8.946 0.7854 5.79 0.2500 MH 16,E5-5 2-48 Y 60.3 56.6 - - N 4-3-356 ERR 0.0000 ERR ERR MH 16,£5-6 2-48 Y 78.0 72.24 72.11 - Y N/R 8 CMP 25 0.024 I6,E5-2 4-3-356 0.520 0.3491 0.47 0.1667 . MH 16,E5-8 2-54 Y 68.0 60.8 56.86 - Y N/R 8 CMP 41 0.024 16,E5-9 4-3-356 9.610 0.3491 2.03 0.1661 MH 16,E6-1 _ 2 Y 36.34 31.3 26.2 C M 24 CC - 0.012 16,06-18 19-1-13 ERR 3.1416 - ERR 0.5000 NH 160-10 2 Y - - - C N _ 12 CC - _0.012 16,E6-9 - ERR 0.7854 ERR 0.2500 MN 160-11 2 Y 27.66 19.96 - S N 12 CC - 0.012 16,E6-2 16-4-16 ERR. 0.7854 ERR 0.2500 _ MN 16,E6-12 2 Y - - - S N 12 CC - 0.012 16,E6-11 ERR '0.7854 ERR 0.2500 MH 16,E6-13 2 Y - - - S N 12 CC - 0.012 16,E6-12 ERR 0.7854 ERR 0.2500 _ MH 16,E6-19 2 Y - - - C N 50 CMP - 0.024 16,06-12 - ERR 13.6354 ERR 1.0417 60X36 PIPE MN 16,E6-2 2-48 Y 23.49 16.49 - C N 12 CC - 0.012 16,E6-4- 16-4-16 ERR 0.7854 ERR 0.2500 MH 16,E6-20 2 Y - - - C M 80X CC0.01216.E6-21ERR 0.0000 ERR ERR MH 16,E6-21 2 Y - - - C N 50 CAP - 0.024 16,E6-22 ERR 13.6354 ERR 1.0417 60X36 PIPE MN 16,E6-22 2 T - - - C N SO CMP - 0.024 16,E6-23 ERR 13.6354 ERR 1.0417 60X36 PIPE MN 16,E6-23 2 Y - - - C N 50 CMP 0.024 0.024 160-19 ERR 13.6354 ERR 1.0417 60X36 PIPE MH 16,E6-8 2 Y - - - C N 50 CMP - 0.024 16,E8-19 - ERR 13.6354 ERR 1.0417 60X36 PIPE MH 16,E8-1 2-48 Y 21.28 16.23 13.97 - N 12 - 191 - 16,E8-2 4-3-355 1.183 0.7854 ERR 0.2500 MN 16,E8-10 2-72 T 22.2 15.57 15 - T N/N 18 CMP 13 0.024 160-11 19-1-112 4.385 1.7671 11.95 0.3750 MN 16,E8-11 2 Y - - - - M 24 160-12 19-1-112 ERR 3.1416 ERR 0.5000 MH 160-12 2 Y 21.26 - 13.95 C N 24 CC 10 0.012 16,E8-17 19-1-112 0.000 3.1416 0.00 0.5000yr MH 16,E8-13 2 T 21.04 13.64 - C M 24 - - - 13,E8-11 19-1-112 ERR 3.1416 ERR 0.5000 MH 16,E8-14 2 T - 13.18 12.96 C N 24 CC 315 0.012 16,08-2 4-3-205 0.070 3.1416 6.49 0.5000 MH 16,E8-15 2-54 T 20.0 16.09 16 S N 24 CMP 42 0.024 16,E8-5 4-3-210 0.214 3.1416 5.69 0.5000 MN ' 16,E8-16 2 Y 21.84 - 12.85 12.22 C 1 48 RCP 225 0.012 16,E8-17 SN 7TH ST 0.280 12.5664 82.56 1.0000 , MM Ts6,E8-17 2-72 T - 12.22 11.9 C N 48 RCP 115 0.012 16,E8-18 - SW 7TH 0.278 12.5664 82.31 1.0000 MN 16,E8-18 2-72 T - 13.7 13.64 C N 24 CC 23 0.012 16,E8-4 SM 7TH 0.261 3.1416 12.55 0.5000 ~ MN 16,E8-19 2 T - C M 50 CMP - 0.024 16,08-10 ERR 13.6354 ERR - 1.0417 60X36 PIPE MH I6,E8-2 2-48 T 18.77 13.87 - - M 12 - 43 - T TO 60' 4-3-355 0.000 0.7854 ERR 0.2500 MH 16,E8-3 2-48 Y 21.76 17 14.2 - N 12 - 35 - 16,E8-4 4-3-35i 8.000• 0.7854 ERR 0.2500 lilt 16,E8-4 2 Y - 13.64 - C N 24 CC - 0.012 16,E8-14 SW 771( ERR 3.1416- ERR 0.5000 MA 16,E8-5 2-72 Y 22.0 16.0 - C T N/R 24 CMP - 0.024 16,E8-6 4-3-210 ERR 3.1416 ERR 0.5000 NH 16,E8-7 2-54 Y 21.0 16.35 15.75 - N 24 CMP 105 0.024 16,E8-8 19-1-112 0.571 3.1416 9.29 0.5000 !GI 16,E8-8 2-54 T 21.0 15.75 15.57 - N 24 CMP 30 0.024 16,E8-10 19-1-112 0.600 3.1416 9.52 0.5000 lv MN 16,E8-9 2-54 T 21.0 16.35 15.75 - N 24 CRP 96 0.024 16,E8-8 19-1-112 0.625 3.1416 9.71 0.5000 118 16,F3-1 2 T 30.77 20.29 20.04 - N 18 CC 100 0.012 - 1-2-7 • 0.250 1.7671 5.71 0.3750 KO 16,F3-4 2 Y 26.8 22 20.79 C M 12 CC 302 0.012 16,E3-5 1-2-7 0.401 0.7854 2.45 0.2500 '") :MN 16,F4-1 2-48 T 26.3 22.31 - C N 12 CC - 0.012 I6,F4-12 3-1-551 ERR 0.7854 ERR 0.2500 MN 16,F4-2 2-48 1 25.5 22.56 22.31 S M 12 CC 50 0.012 16,f4-I 3-1-552 0.500 0.7854 2.74 0.2500 ... MN 16,F4-3 2-48 T 24.5 21.99 21.56 S N 15 CMP 286 0.024 16,F5-6 3-1-551 0.150 1.2272 1.36 0.3125 OiP 118 16,F4-6 2-48 Y 26.5 24.65 22.56 C N 12 CC 200 0.012 16,F4-2 4-1-124 1.045 0.7854 3.96 0.2500 NM 16,f5 1 2 Y - - C M 12 CC 0.012 16,F5-14 ERA 0.7854 ERR 0.2500 MN 16,F5-10 2-48 Y 24.9 17.97- 17.81 S N 15 CC 110 0.012 16,F5-7 4-1-136 0.145 1.2272 2.68 0.3125 .NV NM 16,f5 11 2-54 T SO S 20.93 20.6 L M 48 CNP 58 0.024 16,f5 12 4-1-136. 0.569 12.566/ 58.85 1.0000 160-12 2-54 T 26.6 20.6 18.22 L T 10 12 CC 70 0.012 16,15-10 4-1-136 3.400 0.7851 7.14 0.2500 ' .itl' • - . . l • _ r • • • 1 I • 1 f / , . • N. 1 / i • I i I 1 I l ;/ ,' _ / • / • 1 / •/. r .11 • •Report • _ ,.� 1 - 'I Il - /• ' 1 1 I -./. l ,/;- 21 •✓, I., 1 - ` . , -4- `, rl., _ I� rGeotechnical.Engirieering Services'' / \-I • I. • . Proposed Apartment Building . II 't, -/` ' \1 ' -• `i ' ` . ''Southwest 7th-Street•and` / \ . 1 I.- /, l,( ' ,,Burnett Avenue;=South- - . •/ ,; N /,' \ r 7 ' -- .1 ' Renton,_Wasthington ; • �, r_ } Ir / • • • / ? ' / ' . Mardi-11;. 1997: � \ ' 1 • / .\ lfre 1.! , I ) ' � •_ • u199 1: . !' , `,,%`.. I` \ 1- :r -� RAT /A/U._ }. ,\ • . / / - \ 1 - '( For -/- _ • , C 'atholic Community Services\" I I / • '� / r l ( 1 \ / ,, i "1 /• �,` - - \ •/ J •- • V l I. _ . t, 1 - i 1 •r , • l. •-r . , • ;\ E• 1 \ \1.f 1_- 1 ;\r :\ - 3 r I J t ` / it :i 1 . \ _ I \( ,r 1 it / \ • • VI, f. •, _ !. _ _ \. 1 , f I t II / / <' (.. i _I. ., / \/ I; ( '., / • �- \ I: G e'o E.'n g i n e e is \ 1 `''✓ �' !File'11o.d968 OQ1=10 1130/031197 1 Y , 1110 Geo NP Engineers Consulting Engineers March 11, 1997 and Geoscientists Offices in Washington, Oregon,and Alaska Catholic Community Services c/o Foster Construction Co. 13522 Roosevelt Way North Seattle, Washington 98133-7845 Attention: Mr. Ed Foster We are pleased to submit two copies of our report, "Geotechnical Engineering Services, Proposed Apartment Building, Southwest 7th Street and Burnett Avenue South, Renton, Washington." Our geotechnical engineering services were completed in general accordance with our proposal dated February 19, 1996. Preliminary results of our geotechnical engineering study were discussed with you as information became available. We appreciate the opportunity to work with Catholic Community Services and Foster Construction on this project. Please call if you have any questions regarding this report. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. ---rie'4•604‘7;11 / Kenneth G. Buss, P.E. G� Associate DCO:KGB:vvl Document ID:P:\4968001.R File No.4968-001-10-1130 Cc: CCSWW 100 23rd Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98144 Attn: Ms. Stephanie Durman GeoEngineers,Inc. 8410 154th Avenue N.E. Redmond,WA 98052 Telephone(206)861-6000 Fax(206)861-6050 { IIIP , . , CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION 1 SCOPE 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 SURFACE !CONDITIONS 2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 2 "' GROUND WATER CONDITIONS I 3 1 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS i 3 GENERAL 3 SITE PREPARATION 3 EARTHWORK 4 SETTLEMENTS 5 SHALLOW FOUNDATION SUPPORT 5 FLOOR SLAB SUPPORT 6 CONVENTIONAL RETAINING WALLS 6 LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL 7 PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 7 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS ! 8 CONSTRUCTION MONITORING 8 I LIMITATIONS 1 8 FIGURES ,I Figure No. Vicinity Map 1 Site Plan ! 2 Settlement Plate Detail 3 ! APPENDICES I Page No. Appendix A - Subsurface Explorations and Laboratory Testing A-1 Subsurface Explorations A-1 Laboratory Testing A-1 APPENDIX A FIGURES Figure No. 1 I Soil Classification System A-1 Key to Boring Log Symbols A-2 Logs of Borings A-3 A-4 Logs of Hand Augers i A-5 A-6 Consolidation Test Results A-7 I G e o E n g i n e e r s i File No. 4968-001-10-1130/031197 411110 REPORT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES PROPOSED APARTMENT BUILDING SOUTHWEST 7TH STREET AND BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON • FOR CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering services for the proposed apartment building to be located at the intersection of Southwest 7th Street and Burnett Avenue South in Renton, Washington. The property is a vacant lot located on the southern end of the block bounded by Smithers Avenue South, Burnett Avenue South, South 7th Street and an alley way. A vicinity map showing the site location is provided as Figure 1. The site is currently undeveloped and vegetated with grass and a southern border of three deciduous trees. We also observed miscellaneous construction debris (asphalt, concrete pieces) and a small stockpile of fill on the property. We understand that the proposed structure will be a two-story timber frame building constructed with a slab-on-grade. We estimate typical light loading for the structure with floor loads in the range of 50 to 100 psf(pounds per square foot) and individual column loads less than 50 kips. SCOPE The purpose of our geotechnical engineering services is to evaluate subsurface soil and ground water conditions at the site as a basis for developing recommendations for site development, foundation design, and other aspects of project construction affected by subsurface conditions. Our specific scope of services includes the following tasks: 1. Evaluate subsurface soil and ground water conditions at the site by drilling two hollow stem auger borings and excavating two hand auger holes. 2. Install a piezometer in one boring and complete at least 2 ground water level measurements. 3. Evaluate pertinent physical and engineering characteristics of the site soils from the results of laboratory tests performed on samples obtained from the explorations. In particular, we completed moisture and density tests, and a consolidation test. 4. Describe site conditions including detailed subsurface soil conditions encountered based on results of the field explorations and laboratory analysis. 5. Provide recommended criteria for site grading including stripping and excavation of any unsuitable soils or improvement of existing fill on site, and imported fill gradation, placement and compaction. Also provide structural fill requirements as needed for support of the building and pavements, and our evaluation of the effects of weather and/or construction equipment on the on-site soils and imported soils. GeoEngineers 1 File No.4968-001-10-1130/031197 , . O 6. Provide foundation design recommendations including allowable soil bearing pressures for shallow-spriead footings for the proposed building. 1 7. Evaluate the liquefaction potential of the underlying soils and provide recommendations for appropriate foundation support alternatives. i 8. Provide recommendations for support of slab-on-grade floors. 9. Evaluate the settlement performance of spread footings and floor slabs. 10. Evaluate pireload/surcharge requirements for the building area, if appropriate, to reduce postconstruction settlements to within tolerable limits for the building type and floor loads anticipated 11. Provide des ign parameters for retaining walls as appropriate. 12. Provide recommendations for pavement subgrade support and design sections for parking and driveway areas. 13. Provide recommendations for surface and subsurface drainage systems to control ground water .. conditions should this be appropriate. SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE CONDITIONS 'I The site is an undeveloped trapezoidal-shaped coiner lot. Site dimensions extend about 87 feet in the north-south direction and 56 to 114 feet in the east-west direction. The ground surface is fairly level with a reported elevation near 27 feet. As mentioned previously, vegetation consists of grass and weeds with a row of deciduous trees along the south border. We observed miscellaneous construction debris(concrete and asphalt pieces) both at the ground surface and within the upper few feet of our explorations. . I SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 1 We explored subsurface soil and ground water conditions by drilling two borings and excavating two hand-auger borings. The borings were drilled to,a depth of 44 and 19 feet, and the hand auger holes were excavated to a depth of 6 feet. Approximate locations of the explorations are shown in Figure 2. Descriptions of the field exploration and laboratory testing procedures and exploration logs are presented in Appendix A. In general, subsurface conditions encountered in our explorations are typical of the area. We encountered interbedded fine-grained alluvial deposits with some zones of organic material. The alluvium typically encountered in the vicinity of the site generally consists of a complex sequence of soft peat, soft to medium stiff silt and organic silt, and loose to dense sand. In our borings completed at this site, the peat was limited to thin lenses interlayered within the soft silt (less than about 2 inches in thickness). The upper portion of the alluvium is loose/soft with the silt and organic zones being quite compressible. The underlying deposits encountered below a depth of 35 feet consist of medium dense to dense sand. I G e o Engineers 2 File No.4968-001-10-1130/031l97 GROUND WATER CONDITIONS Ground water seepage was observed in our explorations at a depth of 3 to 7 feet during drilling/ excavating. A piezometer was installed in boring B-1. Subsequent ground water measurements indicate the ground water level during the month of February 1997 to be at a depth of 3 to 3.5 feet below the existing ground surface. We expect that a seasonal perched ground water condition occurs near the top of the silt and organic layers. The ground water level should be expected to fluctuate as a function of season, precipitation and other factors. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL We conclude that the proposed building can be supported on shallow spread footings bearing on a zone of structural fill. Excavation of the soft, native soils and replacement with structural fill will be required for footing support. Also, some excavation and replacement of native soils will be required for support of the floor slab. The extent of this excavation will depend, in part, on the time of year that earthwork is accomplished because of the sensitivity of the native soils to moisture. Recommended minimum depths of structural fill are provided in subsequent sections. Placement of fill above the existing grades and imposition of building loads will cause consolidation in the underlying soils. If site grades are raised, we recommend that the import fill be placed far enough in advance of building construction so that the majority of settlement caused by these loads will have occurred. If filling is completed at least three weeks before placing concrete for footings, this should be sufficient time for the primary settlement to take place. As a result of our evaluation of estimated settlements and considering the anticipated light building loads, it is our opinion that preloading of the site will not be necessary. However, to reduce the effects of long term settlements of the building due to the presence of the soft, compressible soils encountered at the site, we recommend placing a geotextile on the native soils before placing structural fill for footing support. This is discussed in more detail in a following section of this report. SITE PREPARATION We recommend that the surficial sod and organics he stripped from all building and pavement areas. The depth of stripping should be sufficient to remove the major root structure of the weed and grass cover. The stripped and/or cut material should be wasted from the site or used in landscaping areas. Those areas which are stripped and are to receive fill should be proofrolled with heavy rubber- tired construction equipment if work is done during extended dry weather. Any soft, loose or otherwise unsuitable areas identified during proofrolling should he recompacted, if practical, or removed and replaced with structural fill as described subsequently. We recommend that proofrolling of the subgrade be observed by a representative from our firm to assess the adequacy of the subgrade conditions and to identify areas needing remedial work. GeoEngineers 3 File No.4968-001-I0-1 130/03 1 197 111. If site preparation is performed during wet weather, stripping should be done using lightweight I � construction equipment. Trafficability at the site under wet conditions is expected to be difficult and could result in considerable disturbance to exposed subgrade areas if not done carefully. We recommend the suitability of the subgrade soils be visually evaluated by a representative from our firm. A layer of sand and gravel with less than 5 percent fines (material passing the U.S. No. 200 • sieve), crushed rock or quarry spalls, possibly placed over geotextile fabric, may be useful to stabilize soft areas for access during wet weather construction EARTHWORK' We recommend that all fill placed in the buildingiand pavement areas be placed and compacted as structural fill. The structural pad beneath footings should be a minimum of two feet thick. Minimum subbase thicknesses for the drive area +paving will depend on the time of year of construction, as discussed under "Pavement Recommendations." After stripping, we recommend that the structural pads for footing support be placed, followed by construction of the building pad. We recommend that the minimum thicknesses of structural fill described above extend beyond the edges of the footings in all directions a distance equal to the thickness of structural fill. If site grades are not raised sufficiently to place the recommended fill thicknesses, the native soils should be excavated to the depths required to allow placement of the structural fill pads. All fill material should he free of organics, cllebris and other deleterious material with no individual particles larger than 5 inches in diameter. As the amount of fines increases, the soil becomes increasingly sensitive to small changes in moistIure content and adequate compaction becomes more difficult or impossible to achieve, particularly during wet weather. Generally, soils containing more than about 5 percent fines by weight cannot be properly compacted when the moisture content is more than a few percent from optimum. During wet weather, we recommend using a well-graded sand or sand and gravel mixture with less than 5 percent passing the U.S. No. 200 sieve based on the fraction passing the 3/4-inch sieve. If the gravel content is high, a fines content of up to about 10 percent is generally acceptable. All structural fill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of its laboratory maximum dry density as determined by the ASTM D-1557 test procedure. The fill should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding 10 inches in loose thickness. Each lift must be thoroughly and uniformly compacted. G e o Engineers 4 File No.4968-001-10-1130/03I197 SETTLEMENTS We estimate that 1 to I' inches of settlement will occur as a result of placing a thickness of about 1 to 2 feet of structural fill to form the building pad. Settlement resulting from an areal floor load of less than 100 psf is expected to be less than I inch. If the settlement resulting from the weight of any fill placed on the site is essentially complete before the structural frame is erected, we believe that settlement resulting from the lower floor loading will not adversely affect building or floor slab performance. In order to evaluate the magnitude and time rate of settlement of any import fill placed at the site, we recommend that three to four settlement monitoring plates be installed prior to placing any fill. An example of a suitable settlement plate and a description of monitoring procedures are presented in Figure 3. Initial elevation readings of the settlement plates must be obtained when they are placed and before any fill is placed. If this is not done, the initial settlement behavior of the fill pad will not be recorded and the value of the observations will be diminished in that the total magnitude of settlement will be unknown. The elevations of the plates and the adjacent ground surface should be determined twice each week during filling so that settlement progress in relation to the amount of fill in place can he defined. We recommend that readings be obtained weekly after completion of filling. We recommend that the readings be taken by the project civil engineer and the results forwarded to our office for evaluation promptly after each reading. SHALLOW FOUNDATION SUPPORT Footings supported as described above can designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of up to 1,500 psf (pounds per square foot) for dead plus long-term live loads. This value may be increased by one-third when considering earthquake or wind loads. All exterior footings should be founded at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finished grade, while interior footings can be founded a minimum of 12 inches below top of slab. We recommend minimum footing widths of 18 inches and 24 inches for continuous and isolated column footings, respectively. Lateral loads can be resisted by friction on the base of the footings and the floor slab and passive resistance on the sides of the footings. Frictional resistance may be determined using 0.35 for the coefficient of base friction. Passive resistance may he determined using an equivalent fluid density of 250 pcf, assuming that the soils against the footings for a distance equal to twice the footing depth are placed in accordance with the recommendations for structural fill. This value should be applied from 1 foot below the ground surface in areas which are not paved. In paved areas or beneath floor slabs, passive resistance can be calculated from the bottom of the pavement or slab. The above values incorporate a factor of safety of about 1.5. We estimate postconstruction foundation settlements on the order of 1 inch for the assumed loading conditions. We recommend that the structure he designed to tolerate at least ' inch of differential settlement between adjacent column footings to allow for any variability in subsurface conditions. Approximately 75 percent of the settlement should occur within about two weeks of load G e o E n g i n e e r s 5 File No.4968-001-10-1130/031197 • ' , ; * ., . • * ' . _ . . , • • . \ •1 • • II I 1 / .• l I 'I \ \ \ • , I . J \ / ) " II I / '• � , . / •\ _, _I 1 + ;, " 11 r' t, I ( y • .7 ' /7 - / . I } . / t 1 i' • I,. l k. a. I I. .i / _ , _Ii' l' I'. 1, . I I ' 1 1 ! 1. (' .- _ I,,;) -••\'- I`� •'� • I•• )•C ') I it \ 1 " \\' • \ / i\ • / • I • • 1 A . /� ,I \ A �l ). -1; • ,, ,l -_ ,. I . ' \ '. • • I. r , I'' I / } • I ) -1 , • /" A �;I " - \' A \ ( � Fig• } '''/- 4..., / ^)• 1 'k. I )' ( l \ (. l h I V1 �. 1 1 I. ( I I J Y / • F ' I. / \ fir.' rl. ) l- �' ' ,-1 II^ �! -- i •/>/ application. The effects of long-term settlement on the proposed building can be reduced by placement of a geotextile over the subgrade before placement of the structural fill. The geotextile should consist of a heavy, nonwoven fabric that is permeable and strong enough to resist tearing during installation. Geotextiles suitable for this purpose are Amoco 4545 or 4551, Polyfelt TS500 or TS600, Geolon N45 or N60, Supac 4V2NP or 5NP, or Mirati 160N. FLOOR SLAB SUPPORT A structural fill pad at least 18 inches thick will provide satisfactory subbase support for the slab. We recommend that the upper 4-inch thickness of structural fill under the floor slab consist of a well-graded sand and gravel with a maximum particle size of 3/4 inch and contain less than 5 percent by weight passing a U.S. No. 200 sieve. This 4-inch thickness will provide uniform slab support as well as a capillary moisture barrier. No vapor barrier is expected to he necessary unless control of moisture in the slab area is critical (e.g., where an adhesive is used for tiled or carpeted floors). In that case, a vapor barrier consisting of polyethylene sheeting with bonded seams should he installed. In order to maintain the integrity of the vapor barrier, it should be placed on a leveling course of sand (if the underlying base course consists of crushed rock) and he covered with a layer of sand to protect against damage by workers. We estimate that postconstruction settlements for floor slabs designed and constructed in accordance with these recommendations should not exceed about 1 inch. Differential settlements across the floor area should be less than 1/2 inch in 25 feet if relatively uniform areal loading conditions are maintained. CONVENTIONAL RETAINING WALLS Although the project is in the preliminary design phase, we understand that conventional concrete retaining walls may he constructed for basement walls. Cantilevered retaining walls should be designed for lateral pressures based on an (active) equivalent fluid density of 35 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) if the ground surface behind the wall is level for a distance of two times the wall height. Any appropriate surcharges should he added to this lateral pressure. The equivalent fluid density value applies to fill behind the walls that is placed and compacted as recommended previously with the exception that the MDD should be limited to a maximum of 92 percent to prevent overstressing the wall. The above equivalent fluid density also assumes a free-draining condition behind the wall. Because a high ground water condition exists at this site, it is crucial to construct a drainage system behind the wall. This can be accomplished by placing a minimum 18-inch-wide zone of sand and gravel containing less than 5 percent fines against the wall. A drainpipe should be placed at the base of the footing to remove any water in this zone of sand and gravel or weep holes can be used if the seepage can be routed to a suitable discharge. We recommend that the footing drain be sloped to drain by gravity to the storm drainage system or other suitable discharge point. G e o E n g i n e e r s 6 File No.4968-001-10-1130/031197 ii• LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL The Puget Sound basin is located within a seis ically active area in which many significant earthquakes have been recorded. Of these, two were large events which resulted in damage to some structures. The first earthquake, which was centered,in the Olympia area, occurred in 1949 with a Richter magnitude of 7.1. The second earthquake, which was centered between Seattle and Tacoma, occurred in 1965 with a Richter magnitude of 6.5. Damage which in some instances may have been related to localized liquefaction was reported in some areas within the greater Puget Sound area. We completed a preliminary evaluation of the liquefaction potential at this site based on the soil type and consistency encountered in our explorations. Our borings encountered a loose discontinuous sandy layer with a thickness ranging up to about 15 feet. This loose sand layer has a high susceptibility to liquefaction, while the silt/organic soils!have a low susceptibility to liquefaction. We estimate settlement resulting from liquefaction of the!loose sand layer may range from about 2 to 4 inches. Because of the discontinuous nature of the sand layer, differential settlement at the site may approach the magnitude for total settlement. The design and construction procedures discussed in this report will mitigate some of the liquefaction potential because the floor slab and foundation elements will be supported on a mat of densely compacted structural fill that will be above the highest probable ground water level. The structural fill will help to bridge over any zones of soil)which may liquefy. In order to minimize the risk of potential damage to the structure from liquefaction, several options may he considered. One option, which is the most economical and provides some protection against minor earthquake shaking, consists of tieing the foundation together with grade;beams. Other options include supporting the structure on piles or general site improvement by de sifying the building pad area. Typically, this increase in expense to mitigate the liquefaction potential has not been selected by owners of other buildings of this type. PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS The pavement subgrade area should be prepared in accordance with the recommendations for site preparation. If subgrade preparation and paving is completed in the summer or early fall when low ground water level and dry weather conditions prevail, we recommend the placement of a 6-inch- thick subbase layer consisting of sand and gravel with less than 5 percent fines. If the area is prepared during wet weather, a subbase thickness of 12 inches or more, possibly with a geotextile fabric, may be required. If site grades are not raised sufficiently to place the recommended fill thicknesses, the native soils should be excavated as needed to place the subbase layer. We recommend that the pavement section consist of a minimum thickness of 2 inches of Class B asphalt concrete over a minimum thickness of 4 inches of crushed rock. The crushed rock should be similar to Washington State Standard Specification 9-03.9(3). We recommend increasing the Class B asphalt thicknless to 3 inches in the drive areas where heavier traffic loading from garbage trucks and other similar vehicles is expected. G e o E n g i n e e r s 7 File No.4968-001-10-1130/031197 lb • The construction schedule should allow time for the parking subgrade soils to "heal" prior to placing crushed rock and asphalt concrete. The subbase surface will not serve as support for construction traffic and construction haul roads should he provided as necessary. The crushed rock base course and subbase fill should both be compacted to at least 95 percent of the MDD determined in accordance with ASTM D-1557. Backfill in utility trenches underlying paved areas should also be compacted in accordance with the recommendations for structural fill presented in this report. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS We recommend that the roads and parking areas be sloped to drain away from the building such that surface runoff is collected and carried off the site. A perimeter footing drain is also recommended. Footing and wall drains should he routed to a suitable discharge point, preferably to a storm sewer. Roof drains should also he separately routed to a suitable discharge point and should not be connected to any other subdrains. CONSTRUCTION MONITORING The site preparation and earthwork phases of construction are critical to the successful completion of this project. We recommend that GeoEngineers he retained to provide monitoring and testing services during these phases and during foundation installation to evaluate that the work is completed in general accordance with the intent of our recommendations. These services should include monitoring of the site preparation and proofrolling to identify on any remedial work that may be needed to repair areas of subgrade, observation and testing during tilling, review of settlement marker data to advise when settlements are essentially complete, observations during footing subgrade preparation, and final subgrade preparation for floor slab and pavement areas. LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for use by Catholic Community Services , Foster Construction, and other members of the project team for use in design of this project. The report is not intended for psi'by others and the information contained herein is not applicable to other sites. The data and report should be provided to prospective contractors for their bidding or estimating purposes, but our report, conclusions and interpretations should not he construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. When the design has been finalized, we recommend that we he retained to review pertinent sections of the design drawings and specifications to see that our recommendations have been interpreted and implemented as intended. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. GeoEngineers 8 File No.4968-001-10-1130/031197 Variations in subsurface conditions are possible between the explorations. Variations may also occur with time.) A contingency for unanticipated cinditions should be included in the budget and schedule. Sufficient monitoring, testing and consultation by our firm should be provided during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, to provide recommendations for design changes should the conditions revealed during .•, the work differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether or not earthwork and foundation installation activities comply with contract plans and specifications. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and k budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in this area at the time the report was prepared. No other conditions, express or implied, should be understood. O. I. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to Catholic Community Services and Foster Construction. Pllease call if you have any questions or need additional information. Respectfully submitted, v� � ;. Q, o� Askrl, :�. c'y t GeoEngineers, Inc. 11. kv\1-", tiff, 30 C)470-C-CLe1104-1 0 ., 29�247 �� cv'w LISTER � ` Debra C. Overbay, P.E. s S1ONAL 0, Senior Engineer EXPIRES 7/23/q, 7/Kenneth G. Buss, P.E. Associate ' I DCO:KGB:wi Document ID: P:\4968001.R III I I � G e o E n g i n e e r s 9 File No.4968-001-10-1130/03(197 izeil , , . . I.,"_ _ _„,____ s vv.s 51,4 5 l:t PL eZ.,�'i war.T.,:a1 "t N z I '�`�\'^5.@ iii,LC 6 „E 6M 0'�(/ TM _ _r 6.rF...1',- . ,-- �� 6T�I STt��� I ' 1 y DLNMsNE . ai F I \,`/, e'< C sY Sf I Z a CCuu 97Y[e*\ kJ!L = ST • x� A� P 2600 0200 ST -- . w J • 0y ' Nei 3T9 7 m: _ ' .....,... in S.<1301M .SW . u 1i CC •, w {j I! TTIIIMILTST T �y zET+11c+u�.• O REMDN \• • �1�' �1�.7��©�_�_i�' _ 4t -.Al • ! / - 9G I , a --. pi 1/1 M AI__ART__AIRPORT WY ©,N 21"41 g g`f J�,s, / NE 3Po S 132ND ST , MW 2ND ; TILLIcd4..ST 5 I mt,„ I-- ®: S . TIuLL. _ • IIOo NI/�� z7AVTER - a4. Pc „;I I ST TOBIN ST \t�� i , f/ 4J� q _I S ;,, -...e, -;ITT 300 P ®�a� Qoa v f ,� ,y.^�I 7'7 e p • croR1A >I TT a a.wR �/0�'.. x>y /� 1/ 34TH�1 ST I s d Sv 12x0 5T 18 R SDN=v7N Pie, n \;A .;LIRERIY i; ,}Lf64R � = oCIVNfT s P $� — c� Fro" \PAR< ;RIVER >N QV PL ` , r> S 2ND ST s v7 P PARK g mS cD+ErEar i_t .cr., , 9t yr a , • ,',01i, 90o W ®Frx.=� S 3RD EllaSTf -'i •� r% '5, _�—=10% Pe/i1 �\ 1 k c 9 •\ - __�' S L 4TH®� r<' '/ cy T ,,Nc, `�, r �� sr sG �� S ;t•. Cam\ �'g_1aca.1' r�O OSie d 1 ` , 'q� pT� SE 'hi ET P TM P pp 1 sTH I 1 �'/SF' /�' RD ,,' BN I a mot" Q: \� i17i�7 -STH�>�j BCC V•\°� Z. !. -- �.. i I / ► 1W �'!��!� -� •%� 5 ,�, S 7TH CT _ ROADSIDE .I = g�� i' S PARK ,n I c W aye ! I,,. o t� I ,n< ›.t Ra RIDE, Dr2f ' 11j15, I mo. .�``-. .E B� Pl • 'J I 3ISW C/1 MDN VILLAGE I' © _ A LD"•`•�+y 0ZH - i w I 1 5T yl lito W� �_.. ? I CEMER LLSLTi E c�F. " IAv�sQ A W1F 1 ® 5 R NTON Y[LLAGE PL s Ilnl sr ERjo� DI fA P I S i HDCt67r ElI `� _ i"'w SF "co- --. R S ick'Fq� "� ��iiiiiiig ' INN ` o\ '.IT�r z .,• �� oEQ �`a,. �'r, 2 `_-M1H ss P i l Z.1 $ ztt \3�)...„ gyp s: ... _ ��. I__ i i' �<a, 16TH L ,,,'"" ,Q.. 4 SE I S, , . S AV t. 1 SW - 400 16TH ST , O' y S 16TH sr :`� °� �16n Q(iSE • Sc 94' le c' ;Lifts ' •o_ ox c _ 'SE 5ACM �yy V 3 T. i _, :• • n S " T/' `S,,I,. � E.3a� , .•> .r 'L I o SW 19TH STr5:8iT Q $ rib $„ o{ �sF/c.. � s' I lg�, cr Y 4 SE 157TH1 ST s , j'' S 19TH ST I l.tJ I ,I G S TALBor o 4 ,s g•sT tr, sF rf TiE . `.I Cf-I� ;� �N k'ri'PARK -P 4100 S f ,,,n�U N,, •`,,, scs 8 ...., < o`Tb� 7sirN o�. I\;1 �I ! ''r ,<i� < 1 PUGET r•s ‹ ,i CT dy der scg BCr q i PL t , CD d I ",. E ya G zoo s.St 215T g c �0/ ,•/�N N = -� 2 .r's P1,a�, • ^71 SE 21ST ST -•E"�F I_rir v�'i L(3 I C lP .^ a� E •2N0 PL J. 1`60 �� $T R N 4, SW 23RD ST S 23RD I ST w s I sF 1—--—-- ''srF�6p ¢ { N I :° ` r HID I I w] ,., t'• rH 6:SE I.ISi Si, Oil w \\ 'i\ �8 - :rP•ux ' �',n S Ni ^ \ , 162ND-cl <' ST =S ,.c it I < 1 S 7` TM` Q� ,S I Z. y--� N SE 163RD ST-eo G 1620; �`i i sr s •o �� > ( , SE 164TH ^ sr -i ST 2i • ,1 SW 27TH Sr i i,i: F,.}T,; t4° s r ,. j S 27TH ST N 10900 Illoo SE 164THoD -i Id 'I S 27TH P 28TH P'Prj.I 20t9'CI L o 1 s ZSTH-SY= < o SE 165TH o,ii, SE 165TH se. �1V ` '1-i"1/ 'Le <S q1H u E 166TH1 SE 291H•5T ¢ ,n w^ST a 's .`�,5 ,�; JW 29TH ST !•I e',,.�T6,1•"S,, • PL 'r ST o SE 167TH sr I -H SE;e 166TH PL 4,• R 7j' A a•^_; i xl I ,30 •;lam\ v p��+'e��„ wnl cr �' inl� ,~. I '¢ 8 r W.cT,�,rK`� s�si 6; 1 O; L .. 0 2000 4000 o t SC IN N FEET , co t LD rn. a-^ Reproduced with permission granted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS. This map is copyrighted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS. It is unlawful to copy or reproduce all or any port thereof, whether for personal use or resale, without permission. 1 Geo N����. VICINITY MAP �Engineers - ol ®i\® FIGURE 1 , Measurement Rod, 1/2-inch- diameter Pipe or Rebar Casing, 2-inch-diameter Pipe (set on plate, not fastened) Existing Ground Surface ' Coupling Welded to Plate I ,V. ; \�/ii//\•\\\ \ /il/lI \\\\\\ \ —ham I,Ir • (Not to Scale) I Settlement Plate, Sand Pad, if Necessary 16"x 16"x 1/4" NOTES: 1. Install settlement plates on firm ground or on sand pads if needed for stability. Take initial reading on top of rod and at adjacent ground level prior to placementiof any fill. 2. For ease in handling, rod and casing are usually installed in 5-foot sections. As fill progresses, couplings are used to install additional lengths. Continuity is maintained by reading the top of the measurement rod, then immediately adding the new section and reading the top of the added rod. Both readings are recorded. 3. Record the elevation;of the top of the measurement rod at the recommended time intervals. Record the elevation of the adjacent fill surface every time a measurement is taken. 4. Record the elevation of the top of the measurement rod to the nearest 0.01 foot, or 0.005 foot, if possible. Record the fill elevation to the nearest 0.1 foot.. 5. The elevations should be referenced to a temporary benchmark located on stable ground at least 100 feet from the area being filled. SETTLEMENT E DETAIL Geo��Engineers FIGURE 3 • S . S _M- • • r -.. _ _a- _j_ /—._ T /�, - 1 // ____ / I j2 - J RaJN I ` i -- • DRIVEWAY HA-1 'cue W4r) • 4 HA-2 4 . • III L_ 7 / a g ' to/ cn J s I / EXPLANATION: 1 1B-1 il - 1=1, I J /�/ /�/ Q-1 BORING 1111 1 AUI I Rea;, - l �� 1 / , ,/ / /yam,` HA-1 ; HAND AUGER -- i�i111E1•I� UII i / / `V , 7-1111MITCD'w-J / . rn t / / /L—_� *AT11 N t S EVENTH STEREE.T )1 N 0 i 0 0 1 OD 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET -. SITE PLAN . Geo 4�Engineers o8 Reference: Undated, unreferenced drawing. O. FIGURE 2 0 i S APPENDIX A SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTING SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS We explored the subsurface conditions at the project site by drilling two borings and excavating two hand auger holes at the approximate locations shown in Figure 2. Exploration locations were located by pacing from existing site features. Elevations were interpreted from the topographic drawing "Boundary and Topographic Survey for Catholic Community Services", dated January 23, 1997. The borings were drilled to depths of 19 to 44 feet on February 5 and February 7, 1997. The borings was drilled using a truck-mounted, continuous flight, hollow-stem auger drill. Representative soil samples were obtained from the borings at selected depth intervals using a 3-inch-outside-diameter, heavy-duty, split-barrel sampler with brass liner rings driven into the soil using a 300-pound hammer free-falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler the last 12 inches, or other indicated distance, is recorded on the boring log. The hand auger borings were excavated to a depth of 6 feet on February 5, 1997 using hand equipment. The explorations were continuously monitored by a representative from our firm who obtained representative samples, observed surface and ground water conditions and maintained a detailed log of the conditions encountered. Soils were visually classified in general accordance with the system described in Figure A-1. A key to the boring log symbols is provided in Figure A-2. Logs of the borings and hand auger holes are presented as Figures A-3 through A-6. The logs are based on our interpretation of the field and laboratory data and indicate the various types of soils encountered. The logs also indicate the depths at which the subsurface materials change, although the change might actually be gradual. If the change occurred between samples in the explorations, it was interpreted. Observations of ground water conditions were made as the explorations were performed. The ground water levels observed during drilling are presented on the boring logs. A piezometer was installed in boring B-1. Subsequent ground water measurements made during the month of February 1997 indicate the depth to ground water ranges from 3 to 3.5 feet below the existing ground surface. LABORATORY TESTING All soil samples obtained were brought to our laboratory for further examination. Selected samples were tested to determine their moisture content, dry density, and compressibility characteristics. The results of the moisture and density tests are provided on the boring logs. A one-dimensional consolidation test was performed to measure the dimensional and time- rate compressibility characteristics of a representative fine-grained soil sample. The consolidation test results are presented in Figure A-7. G e o Engineers A - 1 File No.4968-001-10-1130/031197 I u 0 . . . ' SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM GROUP MAJOR DIVISIONS I SYMBOL GROUP NAME GRAVEL CLEAN GW WELL-GRADED GRAVEL,FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL II COARSE GRAVEL ', GRAINED GP POORLY-GRADED GRAVEL SOILS More Than 50% I' of Coarse Fraction GRAVEL GM SILTY GRAVEL I II Retained WITH FINEST II GC CLAYEY GRAVEL on No. 4 Sieve I; More Than 50% SAND CLEAN SAND SW WELL-GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND Retained on No. 200 Sieve SP POORLY-GRADED SAND More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction SAND SM SILTY SAND li Passes WITH FINES , SC CLAYEY SAND No. 4 Sieve FINE SILT AND CLAY ML SILT GRAINED INORGANIC II SOILS ,i CL CLAY Liquid Limit - Less Than 50 ORGANIC I OL ORGANIC SILT,ORGANIC CLAY I' I ,I, I SILT AND CLAY MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT More Than 50% + Passes INORGANIC , CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY No. 200 Sieve Liquid Limit 50 or More ORGANIC ' OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT • NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: 1. Field classification is based on visual examination of soil Dry- Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch in general accordance with ASTM D2488-90. I Moist- Damp, but no visible water 2. Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on ASTM D2487-90. I I Wet- Visible free water or saturated, usually soil is I I obtained from below water table 3. Descriptions of soils density or consistency are based on interpretation of blow count data, visual appearance of ' soils, and/or test data. I I it I cn co i SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM W Geo,'Engineers FIGURE A-1 LABORATORY TESTS SOIL GRAPH: AL Atterberg Limits CP Compaction SM Soil Group Symbol CS Consolidation (See Note 2) DS Direct shear GS Grain size Distinct Contact Between %F Percent fines Soil Strata HA Hydrometer Analysis SK Permeability Gradual or Approximate SM Moisture Content Location of Change MD Moisture and density Between Soil Strata SP Swelling pressure TX Triaxial compression Water Level UC Unconfined compression CA Chemical analysis Bottom of Boring BLOW COUNT/SAMPLE DATA: 22 II Location of relatively Blows required to drive a 2.4-inch I.D. undisturbed sample split-barrel sampler 12 inches or other indicated distances using a 12 ® Location of disturbed sample 300-pound hammer falling 30 inches. 17 El Location of sampling attempt with no recovery 10 0 Location of sample obtained Blows required to drive a 1.5-inch I.D. in general accordance with (SPT) split-barrel sampler 12 inches Standard Penetration Test or other indicated distances using a (ASTM D-1586) procedures 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. 26 m Location of SPT sampling attempt with no recovery ® Location of grab sample "P" indicates sampler pushed with weight of hammer or against weight of drill rig. NOTES: 1. The reader must refer to the discussion in the report text, the Key to Boring Log Symbols and the exploration logs for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. 2. Soil classification system is summarized in Figure A-1. KEY TO BORING LOG SYMBOLS Geo NO Engineers FIGURE A-2 TEST DATA I 1111 BORING B-1 410 ' I 1 DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry; Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): 27.0 1 Lab Tests (%) (pcf); Count Samples Symbol 0 —0 — SOD Sod layer with scattered concrete debris ML Gray silt with a trace of fine sand(very soft to soft, moist) MD 38 83 1 2 ■ 5— /��OL Gray organic silt with occasional wood debris(very soft, moist) —5 MD, 81 50 2/18" III.."'`&A- (fill7) - CS ^`�`' ✓r SP Gray fine to medium sand(loose,wet) 7 II - 10— —10 - 7 ® - 15— —15 - MD 29 93 8 ■ - . F- Lu -4 LL 20— —20 z - - f=-. y ML Gray silt with fine sand (stiff,moist) w 10 O '1 o 25— ' —25 - 3 I Grades with organic lenses 30— —30 N. - - m ;3 Gray Gray silty fine sand(medium stiff,moist) u —35 0 35— o - - o - l SP Gray fine to medium sand with a trace of silt(medium dense, - •• wet) - - 20 Q 40— —40 o 40 II Grades with gravel - Boring completed at 44.0 feet on 02/05/97 O 45— i Piezometer installed to a depth of 20 feet —45 I Ground water encountered at approximately 7.0 feet during - o drilling - co v Note: See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols LOG OF BORING Geo�, Engineers FIGURE A-3 • TEST DATA BORING B-2 S DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): 27.0 Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 0— SM/ML Brown and gray silty fine sand interlayered with grayish brown 0 silt and a trace of organic matter(very loose/soft, moist) MD 42 79 2/18" ■ : : 5— • —5 .— SP-SM Gray fine to medium sand with silt(loose,wet) - 5 10— • —10 ML Gray silt with thin lenses of organic matter(soft,wet) MD 57 56 3 ■ 15— / —15 Gray silty fine sand with a trace of organic matter(loose,wet) 5 ■ ►- Boring completed at 19.0 feet on 02/07/97 LL20— Ground water encountered at approximately 5.0 feet during —20 Z drilling - I- tl - - w 0 25— —25 30— —30 n - rn c. U g U 0 35— —35 0 0 -) 40— —40 o - M 45— —45 o - - 0 ao _ CD m Note:See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols LOG OF BORING GeoN�Engineers FIGURE A-4 i I •TEST DATA HAND AUGER HA-1 • • • DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): 27.8 Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol ^0 �— SM Dark brown silty fine sand with roots(loose,moist) I I SP-SM Brown fine sand with silt(loose,moist) 1 - • 2 = SP/GP Brown and orange fine to coarse sand with fine gravel(loose to medium dense,wet) • • • 3 - -= - ML Gray silt with fine sand and a trace of organic matter(soft,wet) H 4 w , LL _ I n.. wo 5— —5 • Ei Boring,completed at 6.0 feet on 02/05/97 Slight ground water seepage observed at 3.0 feet n m 7 _ - U 2 U 0 U O ' U 8 _ 9 - - O M O O —1 0 CD 10 O Note: See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols LOG OF HAND AUGER Geo�OEngiineers FIGURE A-5 1111 TEST DATA HAND AUGER HA-2 111110 DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): 26.5 Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 0— SM Dark brown silty fine sand with roots(loose, moist) 0 ML Light brownish gray and orange silt with fine sand and a trace of organic matter(soft, moist) 1 - 2 - - 3 - - ML Gray silt with fine sand and a trace of organic matter(very soft, wet) 4 LL 0 5— —5 6 - Boring completed at 6.0 feet on 02/05/97 Slight ground water seepage observed at 3.5 feet a) rn ch 7 _ - U 2 U O U U 8 _ — 9 - O O O 10— —10 rn Note: See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols LOG OF HAND AUGER Geo%leiEngineers FIGURE A-6 4968-001-10-1130 DCO:KGB:vvl 03/11/97 (FINALS\4968001\CONSOL.PRE) - 0 .< CONSOLIDATION(inches/inch) (D o 0 0 0 0 'oo 0 C.) • N COOND A V O III 03 z al K x O I i I i f i i I I i ®�`�r mZ - I i - - a i i 1 - I I iI -.-..._._I._...__..__....._.. io ! I , CfQ � N 'om :i i I • cn m K ... ' r 's �M_ i I i i • mCD - ._... .._._.. i : v — — — — --- ........._.. _i-.__.._1..--— ----....—..--- --..----...--.-....... -- cn i.. • • i7• n cp = coI • i i ( i I x I i • m N ' ! TV I- - - - -- -- - [] O X I i i ' I I C) n 0 0 ea z o i I i... i..... .. Oco a, — ....----._._... ._._. ... .. ON - ._.._..._ _....-` ._._...... .. ... ....... .._.... .- -..._._..._.._...__.............i • ........ ..__ `_._........_. ....... _ - � ..__...._._.. . __._.j....................._ I--_._..._........._...._ ...._....._........... - ..._.._ - CI .. 1111 C • O I i i 7J z ng i i I o- N -'.__._. i > m CO Zcn- i • m -....._.. ............._....._...i_.... . ....... ...._.. ... Cn C 1 i C -<- o CO Z C n C o --m ,,,fir- . -< **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 06/02/97 11 : 58 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9703437 Amount : 1, 566 .44 06/02/97 11 : 55 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #1198 AHA PROJEC Init : LMN Project # : LUA97-070 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 182305-9061 Site Address : 633 BURNETT AV S Total Fees : 1, 566 . 64 This Payment 1, 566 .44 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 566 . 64 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0019 Variance Fees 50 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage 16 .44 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 06/02/97 11 :56 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9703438 Amount : . 20 06/02/97 11 :56 Payment Method: CASH Notation: Init : LMN Project # : LUA97-070 Type : LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 182305-9061 Site Address : 633 BURNETT AV S Total Fees : 1, 566 . 64 This Payment .20 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 566 . 64 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage .20