Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA85-092 cc- ,°\'' n c /v I v - 1V r \O. <'88- 49-..!?E n ,) O LZ 'or 'B] 2io..•2 0 mtit C.) h L ° a r a O 6- , I~ �� sc.' t 'f.' :.) Y Iy n V h ` '+r C 1 a V j s / `V .1 f 'y : t y ' 1 0l , , 1 ` I ` , 7 T 1`- YT' ,moo/� / ��'`,1 t ' Cy,�}�.M -•-cam f V 5 00 c• �/ A' c' 41 � et t9 / � , A� �' � r4' ' �T6s' sj esE ! l fr! 0 t o , Oia Zs 2' 10 C. �i.; /i• / • 1 y J D ' iiyL1.- NN.ASc.1 0 ti N s 4.I 0 o -s� � io/iro AI- CO t 54 V�• •f'e' 2 �P4 I !7 (C \ ;' a0 / 1 =Ip Q %`��+,; \� � I; LGT 2 �"� ti LOT I �h or' 9 o • cr LOT r �5;Apo / ~ ' ,-1 aREN SP 345-79111111-7908179008 `• I /64 SS ,SO •1 `; c i! 1,.. I- h t 5BB-190/E 3/455 pI T \ fa ;1 ', 1 M I ,' I r LOT 3 o �� �, 1. 0 oI�L k ( �ia, 4 IZ 559 39�E h 1. 04, I.. �. Sit 14 ----1vC a }Y ,� 41 t`• -' e' LOT 2 L =off' } .c''( � It' LOT 4 5 ,, f ' ' '�, ' ! 1,..‘' •.lh: •cL 1' 13ie 53 . ��e �f'�r,ro , .s SS �� ,o a, >, i 1 ..s o�i> .' 329 7•j 4 � N _3•_p1 yy { I'• o, ' NW. 10- 23 -5 LT 0+4 OF RENTO;J 9 I-- 10 1. II N M NOV 1 1 285 BU!I_DING/ZONING DEPT Ni This sketch does not purport to show all highways, roads or easements affecting said property. No liability is assumed for variations in dimensions and location, and is not based upon a survey of the property described. It is furnished without charge, solely for the purpose of assisting in locating premises. Western Pacific Properties, Inc. and or its agents assume no liability for inaccuracies therein. -No' 41,44‘ i,7� ,, 9�� �D `mila S l.i'e- la.Ir\1 . ..c 7--.*„.----. : It <_____,c). o ----4 '/ �oq so (Nit.) ..... 6,,,.,. _ . o vzge 4_, • , 91 . ,A �� it, V' —11 II in-. ,1 ....- - i , cc . ; (;.+ 2 7 \ k ' TID if'' Z Y3T� 1 �Qi9�' -♦ % \ _ N a lit �y, o f--� ovS E [ —17 �� 1, 1 ,, Lau ,,, _, Sareses.riEc. 62_ . tUI__ — .Z----' I K V r yF.,�' V d; \ 39e • • \ 1 .",92' _ �— I_�z i � � �'/�—� � � J 2. I 39/� g • ,T_��,!.�- , .- // ice// BEG ! NNINti OF FILE . . . . . • ALE TITLE- ' 4-- 09(A --- ;.,.: ' . - . • •• • ••:••••11i•r;P i, .• • „.;,; • . „ : •.' .-•- • •'• • .. • . • '' •••' '• • ' •"! • ••••.. • • : •,= .•• '• ••.= .„=•.; ,•;.= %.=•• , ; • ; •: ••='," - • ;=: •- . • . •' "••••':'• ,••••• ".".,;";;!;L„:..,;,•,,,:,.,=,•, . ,"•• , ••4•„',: • • •• • ` "'•; !,; '„•• ' ;1„•' ! „ •`2 . •••' ' •;. • • •• • • ;•‘-?-'•; •;• .•• ' ''••• :.•.• .•• • - • . ...‘ ; . • ,if=aa • • ."• • ,• • .• ,"" • 5":0.• ' . : •' -• • ;',%•?,":1 :•;:."'"'"• -:"="!'"," ••-• • • • • '-•„ • • s. - • • , • • , „- ••' ".: • • •• • •• • • Applicant ALTHOFF• • • , R-O985 ' File,'No.• • sr• • •' • :• pro ject .Name •- •.. . • • Property Location 4409 N.E. Sunset Blvd. • HEARING EXAMINER: DateHeari ng 12/17/85, Deci s ion:12/30/85 • • Recommendation Approval: with filing of restrictive covenants (8‘ oa.oc, 08 IS • Req./Rec. Date Received Date Response Appeal - Date Received Council Approval - Date Ordinance/Resolution # Date Mylar to County for Recording • Mylar Recording # • • Remarks: Recommend 'approval with filing of restrictive . covenants with King County. I • • • • • • • • • • • • • ' , Public Notice • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RMP'NYON LAND. USE HEA9ING'' ' EXAMINER • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 'APUBuc HEARING WILL BE HELD BY' • .. THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING] EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING Audrey DeJoie , being first duly sworn on oath states that • W THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE he/she is the Chief Clerk of the SECOND FLOOR OF PITY HALL, RE- NTON, WASHINGTON ON DECEMBER • 17, 1985; AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIOPR j THE FOLLOWING PETION:' VALLEY NEWSPAPERS • ANTON ALTHOFF :Application to rezorte 0.81 acre,ot property from 9-3 Residential-Multiple Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News Family, to B-1, Commercial, for future commercial development, file number R. ,'{ Daily newspapers published six(6) times a week.That said newspapers o92-85; located ate.;N• . :Synset E legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Boulevard. are Legal descriptions of the files noted months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published above are on tile in the Renton Building and !_ in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King ,, Zpiting Department. ' Count Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approvedPETITIONS NS ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- y, g as legal "`'' : ARE TO BE PRE- newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON KingCounty. • DECEMBER 17, 1985, AT 9:00 A,M.,TO S PR,ESS THEIR OPINIONS. Ronald G. Nelson ' Building and Zoning Director,' The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Daily News Published in the Pally Record chronicle December 6, 1985 91255 `$ Journal—, Daily Record Chronicle , Daily Globe News , (and ,•j,uar,;,•_.,.. .r :::_ ., %.:4 not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Notice of Public Hearing was published on December 6, 1985 R1255 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $20.79 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 12th day of Dec 19 85 —e/e577—c-e , - / ' e":"0:--(-1:2 Notary Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VN fe7 Awaked 10/84 • Z. USE OF I II THE CITY OF RENTON t$ •. ..µ, , . MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 Th` BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • MAXINE E.MOTOR, IMO 00 CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 o �P 17- F0 SEPSES' • March 11, 1986 II it Mr. Larry Brown 13975 Interurban Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98168 Re: Anton Althoff Rezone; File No. R-092-85 Dear Mr. Brown: The requested rezone was officially approved by the Renton City Council at its regular meeting of February 24, 1986, by adoption of Ordinance No. 3974. A copy of the ordinance is enclosed for your records. We have also enclosed a copy of the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants, filed with King County Records and Elections under Receiving Recording No. 8602060815 on February 6, 1986. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk cc: Anton Altoff Hearing Examiner Building and Zoning Enclosures (2) MEM/gn • L. I TO: Dept. of Assessments /Z.-Oq Z.-Fjg— ATTENTION: Drafting Del went 700 KingCounty Adm nisMarch 3, 1986 OF R4, Seattle, WA 98104 -=ion Bid. ;1 �/� FROM: OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 41 O PUBLIC RECORDS DIVISION x ma o o 4. m The attached material comes to you in 9A (0' response to your recent request. P 9"ED sEP1Eae� C � kb . 317 / MUNICIPAL BUILDING CITY OF RENTONelKOZPsleidi°"? .J. 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WA 98055 PHONE (206) 235-2504 Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk . f2-oq Z-Ss 1 CITY(*.,;0 NT V``ASIilNGTON I AN ORDINANCE NO.3974 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IRENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF . I CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ; : NCE DISTRICT(R-3)CITY OF RENTON TO OFFFIICE PARM DKE(O-P) • I (R-092-85 ANTON ALTHOFF), WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV AudreyDeJoie i (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. , being first duly sworn on oath states that i 1628 known as the "Code of General he/she is the Chief Clerk of the ; Ordinances of the City of Renton", as I amended, and the maps and reports , 1 • I adopted in conjunction therewith,the pro- VALLEY NEWSPAPERS ' zoebelowsinc has heretofore been zoned'as Reesidedencee District(R-3); and- - • I WHEREAS a proper petition for change DailyNews Journal, DailyRecord Chronicle, DailyGlobe News of zone classification of said property has ! been filed with the Building and Zoning Daily newspapers six(6) times a week.That said newspapers 19 p5 r which on tio about November rferrred to Ypublished � 1985, which petition was duly are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six the Hearing Examiner for:investigation, study and public hearing, and a public months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published I hearing having been held thereon on or in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King about December 17,1985,and said matter County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal having been duly considered by the Hear- ing Examiner and said zoning request newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for being in conformity with the City's Corn- King County. prehensive Plan,as amended,and the City Council having 4uly considered all matters relevant .thereto, and all parties having The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Daily News I been heard appearing in support thereof or- , in opposition thereto,NOW THEREFORE Journal—, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News , (and THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its , RENTON, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN PP g y AS FOLLOWS: subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a ' SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton iiss hereby Ord illo lee No., 3974 was published rezoned,to Office Park•'(0Rkas>herein- , ..1 February 28, 1986 R i on �.10 • ... ., _ below specifed;subjecthe firt�lir�gs, 1 conclusions and"decisios fo tn-of the Hearing i 1 - Examiner dated December 30, 1985;the I Building and Zoning Director is hereby The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the ! authorized and.directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance,as amend- Sum Of $ F 3 • 6 ed,to evidence said rezoning,to-wit: . • Lot 2 of Renton Short Plat No.345-79 -- as--recorded under King County Au- //// % ditor's File Number7908179008 situate G% �LGa ��� p/�+�-� in the Southwest quarter of'Section 3,_ Township 23 North, Range 5 East, • - W.M., King County,Washington (Said property being located at 4409 Subscribed and sworn to before me this I t h day of sia rc h 19 B 6 N.E. Sunset Blvd.) `� IAND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants ex- ,ecuted by Petitioner-Owners on or about i February 6,1986 and recorded in the office _ I of\the Director of Records and Elections, I Receiving No.8602060815 and which said . 1 Covenants are hereby incorporated and Note Public for the State of Washington, made a part hereof as if fully set forth. ySECTION El: This Ordinance shall be 1 residing at Federal Way, effective upon its passage, approval and `five days after its publication. I King County, Washington. I PASSED B THE CITY COUNCIL this VN M87 Revised 10/84 • 24th day of February, 1986. Maxine E. Motor, City-Clerk- ' APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 24th i day of February, 1986. Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor 3 Approved as to form: `Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Published in the Daily Record Chronicle February 288,$1198 R�1r410 r Renton City Council 2/24/86 Page three Old Business continued Public Safety Public Safety Committee Chairman Reed presented a report Committee regarding the. North Renton truck parking problem,. referred North Renton on 1/27/86. The Committee recommended that two things be Truck Parking accomplished to alleviate the trucks parking adjacent to the residential zone on North 2nd Street and on the west side of Factory, north of North 2nd Street: 1) Paint the curb red for approximately 20 feet on the west side of Factory Street North, just north of its intersection with North 2nd Street. (This will stop trucks and cars from being too close to intersection.) 2) Post the west side of Factory Street North, north of North 2nd Street to North 4th Streeet, "No truck parking 9:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m." (This will control trucks parking overnight.) MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Hughes presented a report Committee - recommending the following ordinances for second & final reading: Ordinance #3975 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of Althoff Rezone property located at 4409 NE Sunset Boulevard from Medium R-092-85 Density Residence District (R-3) to Office Park (0-P) for applicant, Anton Althoff, File No. . R-092-85. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3976 . An ordinance was read amending a portion of Section 5-801 of Entertainment Title V (Business Regulations) of City Code relating to Device Licensing definition of entertainment device for purposes of licensing Requirements requirements. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL. ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Hughes presented a report recommending the following ordinances for first reading: Comprehensive An ordinance was read amending Chapter 14 of Title IV Plan Compendium (Building Regulations) relating to the Comprehensive Plan Compendium including adoption, purpose, plan elements, and implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. 1984 Standard An ordinance was read adopting the 1984 standard Specifications specifications for road and bridge and municipal construction for Road & Bridge by reference. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL & Municipal. Const. REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke requested a written report which outlines impact of this legislation on Wells Street Bridge construction. Mayor Shinpoch concurred in the request. Vouchers Ways and Means Committee Chairman Hughes presented a report recommending approval of Vouchers 13034 through 13366 in the total amount of $726,193.41 , having received departmental certification that merchandise and/or services have been received or rendered; Vouchers 13038 through 13044 machine voided. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE VOUCHERS AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Council President Mathews referenced EESB 4630, tort reform Legislative Bills liability insurance legislation, supported by AWC. This bill would divide awards into economic and non-economic compensation, the latter, capped at $250,000; require structured time payments for large awards; and eliminate joint liability for persons who are in some part responsible for their own injuries. Moved by Mathews, seconded by Keolker, City of Renton go on record as supporting EESB 4630. Following discussion which indicated mixed feelings on this bill , motion was withdrawn, Council having decided not to take a stand. On other matters before the State Legislature, it was indicated that the Council has already gone on record supporting the bill WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT FEBRUARY 24, 1986 ORDINANCES The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second and final reading: Anton Althoff Rezone (R-092-85) from R-3 to 0-P - 4409 N.E. Sunset Blvd. Definition of "Entertainment Device" in City Code The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first reading: Amending Chapter 14 of Title IV Relating to Comprehensive Plan Adoption of 1984 Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction by Reference APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS The Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of Vouchers No. 13034 through No. 13366 in the amount of $726,193.41 . Rob Hughes Chairman K thy Keo14 Thomas Trimm Renton City. Council 2/17/86 Page four Old Business continued . Hiring Policy - this matter, the report being presented for information only. Former Employees MOVED. BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE as Consultants COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT. CARRIED. (continued) Council President Mathews presented a Committee of the Whole Salary Plan report recommending adoption of Policy and Procedure No. 300.41 , Policy & Procedure Salary Plan Administration, as recommended by the Personnel No. 300.41 Department, effective 2/14/86. Administrative The Committee of the Whole also recommended that the following Reclassification reclassifications be approved: Procedure (Referred Grade 5 and 7 established in new Electronics Shop Training 7/22/85) Program, grade determined by experience and background; Grade 10 established as promotional level position. Court Administrator reclassed from Grade 9 to Grade 10. Police Records Supervisor reclassed from Grade 9 to Grade 10. Pay differential of 5% be re-established for Water Drainage Leadman retroactive to 12/31/85 to compensate for special circumstances in storm drainage project. (Pay differential was phased out for lead position effective 12/31/85.) MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT. CARRIED. Correspondence Councilman Stredicke.. suggested that letters referenced or Policy submitted during Council meetingsbe ;read into the record by the City Clerk for the benefit:Of ;the audience and to ensure that contents are correctly reflected in the minutes of the proceedings. • • Transportation Transportation Committee Chairman Trimm presented a report Committee concurring in the request by the Public Works Department to APWA Standard adopt the 1984 Standard Specification for Road and Bridge and Specifications Municipal Construction, and refer the matter to Ways and Means Update Committee for a, resolution. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY HUGHES, ' (Referred COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE TRANSPORTATION 11/25/85) COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Utilities Utilities Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report Committee recommending concurrence in the recommendation of the Public Bid Award - Works Department to award the 1986 Sewer Cleaning, TV Inspection 1986 Sewer and Grouting contract to Gelco Grouting Service, in the low bi.d Cleaning, TV amount of $50,867.55 for Schedule A/portion Schedule B. Committee Inspection and also recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized Grouting to sign the contract. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY REED, (Referred 2/3/86) COUNCIL APPROVE THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Hughes presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinances for first reading: Anton Althoff An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of Rezone property located at 4409 NE Sunset Boulevard from Medium R-092-85 Density Residence District (R-3) to Office Park (0-P) for applicant, Anton Althoff, File No. R-092-85. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Entertainment An ordinance was read amending a portion of Section 5-801 Device of Title V (Business Regulations) of City Code relating to Definition definition of entertainment device for purposes of licensing requirements. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Hughes presented a report recommending the following resolution for reading & adoption: • WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT FEBRUARY 17, 1986 ORDINANCES FOR FIRST READING The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first reading: Anton. Althoff Rezone (R-092-85) from R-3 to 0-P - 4409 N.E. Sunset Blvd. Definition of "Entertainment Device" in City Code RESOLUTION The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolution for reading and. adoption: Creating LID #332 and Setting Hearing Date of March 17, 1986 (Oaksdale Ave. SW from SW 7th Street to Grady Way, etc. ) Rober Hug es, airman • • a y Ke9Aker • r Thomas Trimm -=-1: Dept. of Assessments - ATTENTION: Drafting De ._-Iment March 3, 1986 F RA, King County Administration Bld. Seattle, WA 98104 FROM: OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 1 u O PUBLIC RECORDS DIVISION t% ,� z o + o The attached material comes to you in 9,0 • Qo• response to your recent request. ,9gr�Q SEPTEMO�Q \"lik(3LA(‘-C)1)- kb 3 q CITY OF RENTON. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WA 98055 PHONE (206) 235-2504 Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk • CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3974 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R-3) TO OFFICE PARK (0-P) (R-092-85 ANTON ALTHOFF) WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property below described has heretofore been zoned as Residence District (R-3) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classificiation of said property has been filed with the Building and Zoning Department on or about November 11, 1985, which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about December 17, 1985, and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to. Office Park (0-P) as hereinbelow specified; subject to the findings, conclusions and decision of the ORDINANCE NO. 3974 Hearing Examiner dated December 30 , 1985; the Building and Zoning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Said property being located at 4409 N.E. Sunset Blvd. ) AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed by Petitioner-Owners on or about February 6 , 1986 and recorded in the office of the Director of Records and Elections, Receiving No. 8602060815 and which said Covenants are hereby incorporated and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 24th day of February, 1986 Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 24thday of February, 1986 . ahhco.e., ,. cLn.Qoc.� Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. W ren, City Attorney Date of Publication: February 28, 1986 -2- ORDINANCE NO. 3974 EXHIBIT "A" ANTON ALTHOFF REZONE (R-092-85) Lot 2 of Renton Short Plat No. 345-79 as recorded under King County Auditor's File Number 7908179008 situate in the Southwest quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , King County, Washington. a i I N M I n'. , p /1 • Nam! !p '..) rN Nw , U VEk ,.1 ' ")A'! ; ' J 11 ORDINANCE NO. 3974 a 14 f �' ;. li 1 :L:' I. '`, It� r t CO 1- Z t .1".. M rt` .- mil �i ?V '' eil • -70 ! ti /3i C, (1 ... ' r, L (' Z\\ , AO1A c(• a • % Ir. . ,- 4A •! • tlf ,nt E1�• S'I , ,� r� CG �' NTR,4l y/ //Z,4WDS L 6L.J ,I.• a,il/ �. .�'Nr PGAz/, SNORT PLAT 4 10. I 'o,� reh' /,t; s 95 1 i. - O �/ v O9p I A 1 7.2 i. 4 10 �� o , � znlZ�c !1D''I N7 c O ,f I ter' �,b .( N� �� ,E �. nl 05 ‘'Ic :-. lo\ S,4 �o/�, Ae • )l � �ny N'.$ 'y' S/TE Dl N qi 0 t\ /�'�Ib�/J• t.� O•2 Ire I ) It 1r i 0 4 ,1 W a, / 71.9 LOT 2 • N LOT I r ,4- 9 1' •,Iov Z 00 PC. S 44 (.")1' m ii n ,� LOTI o K. m REN SP 345-79 -7908179008 °I •• I e 4 SS is o ,1 5 ,• --, Q 1'9•n/f .3i455 .i. AA� /, 2 t ' ..?P''' P .(. ' �5I/v/D41 4Z7NOFF ) ‘r I SNORT PZAT I. V '1 LOT 3 ,T . h, :.`�' n1ps,• b 4 1:f 1. Pi ) 5Bh+ .39 -I% e. 41 ' ii4 (14 � ._ t, ti �.• it_..0._____— — — ' fi S. ?PII�p� A� n, L. 2 II I n T .� LOT 4 0%PSI . s. I �s� 0351) ! CITY OF RENTON et-y„, _ DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ... , .•.. . . � T_r•Je N AL TOFF IFEZOHE 1 , Iro22 - 8,- • 'Y i DESIGNED DATF FILE NO. '��+• I• DRAWN ---- ' _ I CHECKED SCALE FIELD wurc__r•e¢L � 4� - ��D�� FOR RECORD AT 9;EST OF f'‘ OFFICE:IF THE CITY CIJRX RENTON MUNICIPAL BLDG. 200 MII1 AVE.SO. RENTON,VIA 36055 . Ric,"0,. n ; o 15 B CFIEHSL :f.*::+:;• .no DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS il) ClJ C Ce C\1j WHEREAS, ANTON ALTHOFF is the owner of the following real property in the City of ' Renton, County of King, State of Washington. described as Exhibit 'A' attached hereto. WHEREAS, the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future. of the above described real property. NOW. THEREFORE. the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish. grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors. heirs. and assigns as follows: RECLASSIFICATION AND USE OF EXISTING HOMES • • 1. Zoning of the subject site will revert from O-P back to R-3 if specific development plans in the form of a building permit application. or other land use permit representing an intention to utilize the O-P zoning, such as an application for site plan review or conditional use permit. is not submitted within two (2) years of final approval of this zoning action. ' 2. The existing homes on the subject site are not to be utilized for any commercial endeavor. r ,- DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31. 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further 40 ca documentation. C•Z CO c,0 Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. ANTON ALTHOFF STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of KING ) 1986 On this 2?slay of 1985. before me personally appeared the person(s) who executed the within and fo going-irrsfrument. and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person(s) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Lc_faxv ''AAnn \ VV 4 Notary Pub1id in and for the State of Washington. residing at a r • • • • l• EXHIBIT "A" • ANTON ALTHOFF REZONE . (R-092-85) • • • 11, t-1 • • • Cl C0 C) 4, I • • • • Lot 2 of Renton Short Plat No. 345-79 as recorded under King County Auditor's fi 1 P nuobber 790817901)8 situate i n the Southwest quarter of Section 3, Zbcanship • 23, Range 5 East, W.M. , King County, Washington. , • YJ . . .J M LU • • • • • • • • • I , For.Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # 5 ." AGENDA, ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING = ==== SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. HEARING EXAMINER'S OFFICE For Agenda Of February 3. 1986 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact FRED J. KAUFMAN (Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: ANTON ALTHOFF: 4409 N.E. Sunset Blvd. Consent Rezone of 0.81 acre of property from R-3 Public Hearing Correspondence to B-1 for future commercial development.. Ordinance/Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A. See Yellow file Other B. 4 ■ C. Approval,: Legal Dept. Yes_ No_ N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Refer to Ways . Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A Other Clearance and Means Committee. FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- $ Budgeted Transfer Required' SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary.) Hearing Examiner recommends rezone from R-3 to 0-P - subject to filing of restrictive covenants stating zoning will revert from 0-P back to R-3 if specific development plans such as building permit application or other land use permit representing an intention to utilize the 0-P. zoning, .such as an application for.. site plan review or conditional use permit, is not submitted within two years of final approval - and - .the existing homes shall not be utilized for any commercial endeavor. Restrictive Covenants to be filed prior to Council review. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: See yellow file SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. • OF I •� O THE -CITY- OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9� `O FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 O9�rF0 SEel°4�P January 14, 1986 Larry Brown 13975 Interurban Avenue So. Seattle, Wa. 98168 RE: File No. R-092-85 Anton Althoff Dear Mr. Brown: The Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced request has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Upon filing of restrictive covenants as set out in the Hearing Examiner's recommendation, this matter will be submitted to the City Clerk for transmittal to the City Council for review. You will receive notification of final approval, as well as a copy of the enacting ordinance, from the City Clerk upon adoption by the City Council. If further assistance or information is desired, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, //"..e.-e/,7(2. FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK:dk 1158E cc: City Clerk Building & Zoning Department in � I c DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS 0 N 0 co WHEREAS, ANTON ALTHOFF is the owner of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as Exhibit 'A' attached hereto. WHEREAS, the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs, and assigns as follows: RECLASSIFICATION AND USE OF EXISTING HOMES 1. Zoning of the subject site will revert from O-P back to R-3 if specific development plans in the form of a building permit application, or other land use permit representing an intention to utilize the O-P zoning, such as an application for site plan review or conditional use permit, is not submitted within two (2) years of final approval of this zoning action. 2. The existing homes on the subject site are not to be utilized for any commercial endeavor. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31. 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property ,owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. ANTON ALTHOFF STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of KING ) On this day of 1985, before me personally appeared the person(s) who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person(s) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at I' f - -- I ' EXHIBIT "A" !ANTON ALTHOFF REZONE . (R-092-85) • " Lot 2 of Renton Short Plat No. 345-79 as recorded under King County Auditor's _file number 79081 79008 si t ua - _ i n h _ hwPSt garter o Section 3, 'Ibwnship 23, Range 5 East, W.M. , King County, Washington. RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting February 3, 1986 Municipal Building Monday, 8:00 p.m. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF NANCY L. MATHEWS, Council President: THOMAS W. TRIMM, EARL CLYMER, COUNCIL MEMBERS ROBERT J. HUGHES, KATHY A. KEOLKER, RICHARD M. STREDICKE. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, ABSENT COUNCIL MEMBER JOHN W. REED BE EXCUSED. CARRIED. CITY STAFF BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; IN ATTENDANCE MICHAEL W. PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk; LT. JOE PEACH, Police Department PRESS Tony Davis, Daily Record-Chronicle APPROVAL OF MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL APPROVE THE COUNCIL COUNCIL MINUTES MINUTES OF JANUARY 27, 1986, AS WRITTEN. CARRIED. Mayor Shinpoch indicated she is pleased to be back from her leave of absence, and extended appreciation to Administrative Assistant Parness and Council President Mathews for doing a superb job minding the store the past month. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing: Carlson Claim Claim for damages in the amount of $152.48 filed by Alvin E. for Damages Carlson, 12636 156th Avenue SE, for tire and wheel damage CL 04-86 sustained on temporary paving west of Cemetery Road/Union Avenue NE intersection, alleging failure by the City to provide adequate temporary driving surface (1/18/86) . Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Metzger Claim Claim for damages in the amount of $298.50 filed by Ervin R. for Damages Metzger, 2707 NE 7th Street, for water damage to basement CL 05-86 allegedly due to inadequate City water line (1/18/86) . Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Gallagher Claim Claim for damages in the amount of $20,000 (not including for Damages interruption of business) filed by Donald Gallagher for CL 06-86 Springbrook Trout Farm, 19225 Talbot Road, for flood damage (Springbrook to business allegedly caused by storm drainage improperly Trout Farm) diverted from adjacent property as approved by the City (1/18/86) . Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Bid Opening - City Clerk reported bid opening 1/24/86 for Jefferson Avenue Jefferson NE/ NE/NE 4th Street Signal and Roadway Improvement Project; NE 4th Signal 6 bids. received; Engineer' s estimate: $114,812.64 (corrected) . Refer to Transportation Committee. Bid Opening - City Clerk reported bid opening 1/29/86 for 1986 Sewer 1986 Sewer Cleaning TV Inspection ; Sunset Pump Station System Phase III ; ,Cleaning - Root Removal and Treatment; 4 bids received; Engineer' s iSunset Pump estimate: $50,000. Refer to Utilities Committee. Althoff Rezone .. Hearing Examiner recommended approval with restrictive ,R-092-85 covenants of Anton Althoff Rezone, File No. R-092-85, for 0.81 acres located at 4409 NE Sunset Boulevard from R-3 to B-1 zone for future commercial development. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Funding for City Attorney requested funding for the City to proceed with !Demolition demolition of dangerous buildings located at 3305 NE 7th Street of Dangerous and 716 Monroe Avenue NE and clean surrounding sites as ordered Buildings ' by Hearing Examiner's report of 10/25/85;• Building Department is in the process of obtaining bids for the project. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. r-: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County of King ) DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 30th day of December , 1985, affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. P",_ SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this •?(9)-7 day of cD6-cz dige , 1985. tCadgi,60 og—Oeze& Notary Public and for) the State of Washington, residing at f�'c)?/7,_. , therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: ANTON ALTHOFF - R-092-85 (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) r 1147E - s December 30, 1985 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. APPLICANT: ANTON ALTHOFF FILE NO. R-092-85 LOCATION: 4409 N.E. Sunset Blvd. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Rezone of 0.81 acre of property from R-3 to B-1 for future commercial development. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Deny as presented, recommend City Council rezone to O-P. Hearing Examiner Recommendation: Recommends City Council rezone from R-3 to O-P, with restrictive covenants. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on December 10, 1985. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available, information on file with the application and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on December 17, 1985, at 9:00 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documents pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Assessors Map. Exhibit #3 - Sketch showing houses currently on the site. Exhibit $4 - Site Plan showing the potential building envelope under the O-P zone. The hearing opened with the Zoning Administrator, Roger Blaylock, presenting the staff report for review. After entering the above exhibits, Mr. Blaylock advised this request is for a rezone from residential to commercial on 0.81 acre of property on N.E. Sunset Blvd. At the present time there are two homes on the site. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property for office park uses. There are two main intersections in the area in established commercial nodes; services are currently located in the area; and a review was presented of the four rezone criteria to be considered. The property was rezoned to R=3 in 1979 but in 1981 the Comprehensive Plan was changed to Office Park. Mr. Blaylock stated staff does not believe the requested zone change is appropriate as it is not in compliance with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, and the business designation would intrude into the Office Park development. It was also pointed out that the Planning Commission and City Council had previously looked at the intersections of N.E. Sunset Blvd. and Union Ave. N.E. and N.E. Sunset Blvd. and Duvall Ave. N.E. and declared those specific areas should not become one at this point in time. They also increased the usability of the property by permitting development of offices instead of strictly residential uses when they modified the Comprehensive Plan in 1981. Mr. Blaylock stated when there are properties located near major arterials or between other areas of commercial uses, a designation of multiple-family or office park has been applied. He feels the request is not in conformance and requested the Hearing Examiner to consider a lesser zoning classification. ;Anton Althoff R-092-85 December 30, 1985 Page 2 Continuing, Mr. Blaylock stating the applicant wanted to pursue the B-1 application, but would be satisfied with the O-P classification. He stated if the O-P classification is approved, the front yard setback requirement of 20 ft. is necessary, but the building has ;only 10 ft. at present. It was suggested that if the Examiner recommended a.rezone of O-P to the City Council that he also provide for Restrictive Covenants stating the 'current residences on the property could not be used if converted to Office Park uses. 'Mr. Blaylock closed by recommending the Hearing Examiner recommend to the City Council that they rezone this property to an Office Park designation. Calling for comments in support of this application, responding for the applicant was: Larry Brown 13975 Interurban Avenue South Seattle, Washington, 98168 :Mr. Brown stated his agreement, with the majority of the staff report, but took exception to the staff recommendation of Office Park uses. He stated he originally applied on 'behalf of the applicant for a B-1 classification based upon his real estate experience and knowledge of the area for over 10 years. He reviewed previous rezonings in the area over the last few years and stated there is not a market for office park property in the Renton Highlands area, and feels rezoning this site to that designation would take away the major opportunities that could be utilized by the property owner. Mr. Brown reviewed some of the uses he felt would be marketable in the area, but under the Office Park designation those uses would not be permitted. The property is approximately 35,000 sq. ft. (less than an acre), and the existing O-P zoning he is aware of in the surrounding areas are all on larger acreage, which again, he feels would inhibit the applicant in the usage of this smaller parcel if required to carry O-P zoning. On the current property, if zoned O-P, j 49% of the area would have to be utilized for setbacks. Of that area, a portion would be 'landscaped, with an additional 20% of the overall site area outside of the setbacks landscaped as well, making 35% of the site utilized for landscaping. Mr. Brown stated between Union and Duvall there are over 30 commercial businesses at the present time and feels the imposition of O-P zoning on a small island seems to be out of place. Mr. Brown continued stating he foresees no additional traffic impacts from this proposal 'and stated he has the support of several of the businesses for commercial uses on this property. He referred to a 'mixed use' of property wherein one might use a commercial use on the ground floor of the building and a residential use above. The Hearing Examiner stated when using the O-P zoning it is possible to have retail sales as well as office facilities located above. Mr. Brown advised he was not aware of any of this type of 'facility in Renton, and did not personally feel this would be a successful way to go. When asked by the Examiner if the applicant would accept O-P zoning as a fall-back position, Mr. Brown said the applicant would indeed accept O-P as it would take another year to rezone the property. This would also give him time to look for a buyer who would be able to use O-P zoning or come in for a Conditional Use Permit for the property. There was no further testimony offered in support of this proposal. The Examiner called for testimony in opposition to this proposal. There being no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff, the hearing closed at 9:45 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Anton Althoff, has requested approval of a rezone of approximately .81 acres of property from R-3 (Medium Density Multi-family Residential) to B-1 (Business/Commercial). 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents was entered in the record as Exhibit #1. • Anton Althoff R-092-85 December 30, 1985 Page 3 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971, as amended), a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5. The subject site is located at 4409 Sunset Blvd N.E. on the south side of the street. The site is just west of the McDonalds restaurant. 6. The Albertsons/Ernst Shopping Center is located further east at the Corner of Duvall Avenue N.E. and N.E. Sunset Boulevard. 7. The subject site was annexed into the City by the adoption of Ordinance 2408 which was enacted in May, 1968. 8. The site was reclassified to its current R-3 classification in April of 1979 by the adoption of Ordinance 3311. 9. The property was also the subject of a short plat in June, 1974. (File No. Short Plat 345-79). 10. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of office park type uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. This area was subject to specific analysis since the City intends to prevent strip commercial development between Union Avenue N.E., west of the site and Duvall Avenue N.E., east of the site. The Office Park designation on the south side of Sunset was coupled with a multiple family designation just across Sunset to separate the nodes of commercial proposed and developing at the Union and Duvall intersections. (See Page 57 of the Comprehensive Plan). 11. Staff recommends the site be reclassified to O-P (Office Park) rather than the B-1 classification requested by the applicant. Staff analysis indicates that O-P is the classification which best represents the office park designation in the Comprehensive Plan. 12. The applicant's representative opposes the staff's recommendation. Based upon location, neighboring uses and market factors, the representative indicates that B-1 is more appropriate for the subject site. The applicant indicates that O-P is more acceptable than the site's current R-3 which permits only residential use of the site. 13. Approximately 5 acres of vacant property zoned B-1 are located in the vicinity of the subject site. Another 5 acres zoned B-1 in the immediate vicinity contains marginal uses which could be redeveloped. 14. Uses permitted in the O-P zone include, but are not limited to some of the following: administrative and professional offices; medical and dental clinics; banks; and a variety of schools. Other uses are permitted by conditional use permit. Retail uses are generally prohibited in the zone but can be combined with other uses in the buildings. 15. Existing single family homes are located on the site. One home is located within 10 feet of the street. Staff recommended that the homes not be utilized for commercial uses. CONCLUSIONS 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, it will not impair the public health, safety and welfare, and in addition, complies with at least one of the three criteria found in Section 4-3010, which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or Anton Althoff R-092-85 December 30, 1985 Page 4 c. There has been a material and substantial change in the circumstances in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the • property or area. The requested reclassification is unjustified in light of the designation in the Comprehensive Plan as well as the availability of other land appropriately zoned. 2. The Comprehensive Plan emphasizes the review and resultant determination of the City Council to avoid strip commercial development along Sunset Boulevard in the area between Union and Duvall. While two separate commercial nodes are shown on the map, the map most definitely divides those two nodes by designating the south side of Sunset for office park uses and the north side of Sunset for multi-family development. 3. The office park designation particularly breaks into the commercial strip since it requires greater setbacks, and emphasizes stylish design in a campus type setting. The zone permits flexibility by allowing landscaping and certain setbacks to be shifted due to site variations. In addition, no minimum site area is required. 4. Retail uses, if not the sole use, may also be permitted when combined with appropriate office functions. The latitude of professional offices and medical and dental facilities permits an expanded range of reasonable uses in the O-P zone. 5. The applicant's request, when further viewed against the approximately 10 acres of land already zoned for B-1 uses, is unpersuasive. The applicant's acquiescence in O-P zoning as a step to eventual B-1 zoning hopefully is not an indicator of the applicant's intention to sit on the property. If that were to be the case, than it would be untimely to reclassify the property to even O-P. As indicated, there are a wide range of attractive commercial uses which could be accommodated on the subject site. 6. Given the strong indications of the City to avoid strip development along Sunset in this area, it might be more appropriate to retain the R-3 zoning as a complement to the zoning across the street (R-2 and R-3) and to the Comprehensive Plan's designation of residential for the area north of Sunset. Therefore, this office reluctantly recommends that the City rezone the subject site from R-3 to O-P with the expectation that the applicant will make use of the O-P zoning. 7. The City Council should condition the rezone to include a reversion clause which automatically rezones the property back to R-3, its current zoning, if the development plans are not submitted within 2 years of final approval of the rezone. In addition, the existing structures should not be used for commercial purposes as they would be non-conforming. RECOMMENDATION The City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject site from R-3 to O-P subject to the filing of restrictive covenants specifying that the zoning of the site will revert from O-P back to R-3 if specific development plans in the form of a building permit application, or other land use permit representing an intension to utilize the O-P zoning, such as an application for site plan review or conditional use permit, is not submitted within two years of final approval of this zoning action. The existing homes shall not be utilized for any commercial endeavor. ORDERED THIS 30th day of December, 1985. FRED J. KAUFM HEARING EXAMI R TRANSMITTED THIS 30th day of December, 1985 to the parties of record: Larry Brown 13975 Interurban Avenue South Seattle, Wa. 98168 I Anton Althoff R-092-85 December 30, 1985 Page 5 TRANSMITTED THIS 30th day of December, 1985 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Jim Matthew, Fire Marshal Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle I Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before January 13, 1986. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision; This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. I All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This permits all I interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for • 'Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. - I - This sketch does not purport to show all highways, roads or easements affecting said property. No liability is assumed for variations in dimensions and location, and is not based upon a survey of the property described. It is furnished without charge, solely for the purpose of assisting in locating premises. Western Pacific Properties, Inc. and or its agents assume no liability for inaccuracies therein. 4141‘ 6- 0 r . 6.to % Q�a�- bL /Q a M• 43, . M , ) •et7eC .,- �'� .v eew► 69 .� qso apt - i `'`"`o �, `i'oJ 4—., . . vi 1,/ . •..,__ .... .sr......rfe 1 _.,..., icy. -‘....) ,... .. . ...............• -....1 m . . .. , • _.._.. : • . „it l3 . �� ,. d z v (P! 0 Y Y phi • —' . -N ../ / ' � 4401 ; '0 ,I [ ;y-, .� .. .I_,Ili l' ;I� [7_1 • • VH/ , i\.,,\ �4= jj -. ' I -c2 p cI,•_•r ��G 1' S S ICI ,. '• t— ~ �� •` 39 I _• 'r L r A.-. . "2„......". r" w . \ Z-s---:\ ----- ...• • •io . / R �j f j/f/J/ • ,,,sr.-...`""sic —/ I . I y . i I f - .Ji. 1 .., • I W ' ' I I 1 NNNN Q II , 1 ' y97 I 1 I'j 404 •DB 22I \•� Af,' Te,T:.e 1 --7 nr-.- I I ' 1 , ,� SIERRA HEIGHTS ,.11J',%�"'-' ' 1 1, ,' ELEMENTARY SC HOOL 1 + ma i , ; , \ ..E .oh. eiy• _ - — I ,. ruP �.pp. . . . • '' I .1.JJ '1111 11r I�1 "". 11'T 1 r 1 I I t..--. `, .,, • I 1- ` 1 lj• V...;'• • 1.l.1r. •l I 11J l..11_ \ WI,RI,.�.o Hlls 1r11.n' ^;�JI • 1,� '.,• =131.TS 47e rrk 'Ltvi P:'.r. ,t . ', %r FT•`1:�w;Ii: 1• .a' i. \1 i, , .,. ,... • .,r •1 �y I 1 I 1 i n � •_ " I.I'�,1• I .:'�1;:H._'J1'I'1i,� _j"-'I,I�II�IJ I , _ 1. .,Y.i9.. .�4 t" r • ,'I tog"' a\I~"�='Ia:r• . It��, ,'s• .._ ._ ' $,ifs •-,, 11" • Y t1 ,I w 1.R'1•. 1.1„ eass ',1�„ i• ,t•,1t ,0. 10 ' I M • '��� ^i �, 5.4A. LIr '••.}.. If • -• !1 fe ---- ..' 11 1 ,1 ;I I`rti yw��J.jf '{}ii...t,i: .c..1....::: `r'���.� r I Fin? 1 _I I 1 J '+1'_ _, - ,so , •'T••,�,. , .i1 A. r1-CI 1I 1 , i:.. _ L I• NrrJ wa.•I 1 ���II` 11r :I« l 1.. D. -,l•,:a'SI: I, ro •I.er T.T.i.:l. . .• iius3tur: IG-1 R_2 61 R-2 -3 G-1 ,1 J. B-1 i1 I 1• �- ;(,G-1 _1 . ._ _,._ 1FL 'l_igL.� 11 . 'II • _r.. . i 1 F. ] i ,t : ,, , ... r,..,:,,,:i,, RR��I( I� I! I , • fffMmt • Sr • Y— A -.�` . -�� 1 1 . . ' ,W i HAIEN SR _ :1`2 . . G-1 et 1 ..,i _"- i MIGr, SCHOOL • ALTHOFF REZONE • ' R-092-85 • APPL I CANT ANTON AITHOFF TOTAL AREA - 0_21 ACRF PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E. SUNSET BLVD. • ' ! EXISTING ZONING R-3, RESIDENTIAL-MULTIPLE FAMILY ' EXISTING USE TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES PROPOSED USE ' REZONE OF PROPERTY TO B-1, COMMERCIAL FOR FUTURE COMMERCIAL I EVELOPMENT 'COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN OFFICE/OFFICE PARK :COMMENTS ' I ,���LDING AND ZONING DEPARTME,, PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING DECEMBER 17, 1985 APPLICANT: ANTON ALTHOFF FILE NUMBER: R-092-85 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks approval to rezone 0.81 acre of property from R-3, Residential-Multiple Family, to B-1, Commercial, for future commercial development. • B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Ownpr of Record: Anton Althoff 2. Applicant: Anton Althoff 3. Location: (Vicinity Map Attached) 4409 N.E. Sunset Blvd. 4. Existing Zoning: R-3, Residential-Multiple Family 5. Existing Zoning in the Area: G-1, General Use; R-2, Residential-Two Family; R-3, Residential-Multiple Family; and B-1, Commercial 6. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Office/Office Park 7. Size of Property: ± 0.81 acre 8. Access: N.E. Sunset Boulevard 9. Land Use: Site consists of two single family residences. 10. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Multiple Family Uses East: Commercial South: Multiple Family, Undeveloped Property West: Residential, Commercial C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date • Annexation --- 2408 May 27, 1968 Rezone R-272-78 3311 April 27, 1979 Short Plat Short Plat-345-79 --- June 4, 1979 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: a. Water: A 12-inch water line is located along Sunset Boulevard N.E. and another 8-inch water line is located along Anacortes Avenue N.E. adjacent to the subject site. b. Sewer: An 8-inch sanitary sewer line is located along Sunset Boulevard N.E. 350 feet north of the subject site. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water runoff drains into the Honey Dew Creek system. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requiremehts. 3. Transit: Metro Transit route 114 operates along Union Avenue N.E. approximately 900 feet west of the subject site. t PRELIMINARY REPORT THE HEARING EXAMINER ANTON ALTHOFF, FILE NO. R-092-85 DECEMBER 17, 1985 PAGE 2 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: Honey Dew Elementary School is located approximately 3,000 feet south of the subject property. b. Middle Schools: McKnight Middle School is located slightly more than one mile west of the subject property. c. High Schools: Hazen High School is located approximately 1300 feet southeast of the subject property. 5. Recreation: The Kiwanis Park is located approximately 2800 feet southwest of the subject property. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-709A, R-3, Residential-Multiple Family. 2. Section 4-711, B-1, Commercial. I F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Northeast Renton Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, January 1985, p. 55-60. 2. Commercial Goal and. Policies, Policies Element, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, January 1985, p. 16-18. 3. Section 4-3014(C), Change of Zone Classification (Rezone). G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, Anton Althoff, is requesting a rezone of .81 acre from R-3, Multiple Family Residential, to B-1, Business Use. The property is located at 4409 N.E. Sunset Boulevard. McDonalds is immediately adjacent to the east. 2. The Environmental Review Committee has issued a declaration of non-significance. The appeal period will expire at 5 p.m. on Monday, December 16, 1985. 3. The Hearing Examiner must review four specific criteria under Section 4-3014(C) to determine that the circumstances surrounding the rezone request are adequate to recommend approval of the reclassification to the City Council. The following evidence clearly demonstrates the rezone request is not appropriate. a. That substantial evidence was presented demonstrating the subject reclassification appears not to have been specifically considered at the • time of the last area land use analysis and area zoning. The subject site was annexed into the.City in May of 1968 by Ordinance 2408. Ordinance 3311 in April of 1979 rezoned the property to R-3, Multiple Family Residential. Subsequently, in December of 1981 the Northeast Renton Plan was revised changing the land use classification designation to Office Park. There has not been a rezone request since 1981; thus the criteria appears to have been complied with. b. That the property is potentially classified for the proposed zone being requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is appropriate. The proposed rezone request to B-1, Business Use, is not in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation of Office Park for the subject site. The proposal is on the western edge of a commercial node designated around the intersection of N.E. Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue N.E. This commercial area is dominated by the shopping center located, on the southwest corner of that intersection. f PRELIMINARY REPORT THE HEARING EXAMINER ANTON ALTHOFF, FILE NO. R-092-85 DECEMBER 17, 1985 PAGE 3 The Policy Development Department has presented an opinion opposing the rezone classification to B-1 because the request is not in compliance with either the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map or the intent of the goals and policies. It would create a specific intrusion into the area designated for Office Park development. ISSUE: HAS THERE BEEN SUFFICIENT JUSTIFICATION PRESENTED ,DEMONSTRATING THAT A VARIATION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION BASED UPON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES IS WARRANTED? The applicant has presented data stating that changes in the area suggest that the predominant development of land uses along N.E. Sunset Boulevard are commercial. The applicant also points to the fact that only the B-1 use allows enough flexibility for development of the lot since it is less than one acre in size. The Building and Zoning Department believes that the written presentation by the applicant is not sufficient to warrant the rezone request to B-1 primarily based upon the fact that the Planning Commission and City Council specifically looked at the two commercial areas designated at the intersections of N.E. Sunset Boulevard and Union Avenue N.E. and N.E. Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue N.E. and made a clear statement that those two areas should not grow to become one at this time. The Planning Commission and City Council increased the usability of the property by allowing the development of offices instead of strictly residential uses on the subject site in the Comprehensive Plan modifications in 1981. Another fact that is not supportive of the proposed rezone is the fact that there is an oversupply of commercial area at this time. Normally, rezones in the area would support an applicant's request; however, there is more than five acres of vacant commercial property immediately available for development with potentially another five acres of redevelopment in the area. It should also be pointed out that if the subject site was developed as an office building based upon the required parking and setbacks that there is still the potential for the building to be converted if the City Council changes its position to allow one commercial area instead of two. Since the property is not appropriately classified in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan nor is the request supported by the policies of the • Comprehensive Plan, a secondary issue arises. ISSUE: CAN THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER APPROVE A MORE RESTRICTIVE ZONING CLASSIFICATION THAN INITIALLY REQUESTED? The Hearing Examiner has the ability to place conditions upon or make recommendations of conditions to the City Council upon any land use request. The City Council at the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner on many cases has placed covenants which limit the use or dimensional development requirements of a project. Specific examples are best seen where the use of a site has been limited to office functions without the ability to allow retail uses. In this case the Comprehensive Plan supports the rezoning classification of O-P, Office Park, which is then supported by all of the City departments. An Office Park designation would also comply with the intent of the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition the Office Park classification would allow site plan review. PRELIMINARY REPORT _ THE HEARING EXAMINER ANTON ALTHOFF, FILE NO. R-092-85 DECEMBER 17, 1985 PAGE 4 The reclassification to Office Park would also comply with the three rezoning criteria as outlined under Section 4-3014(C)(1). The most interesting point is that all of the applicant's justifications stating that new development has occurred in the area would then support the issue of timeliness which is a statement that (1) there are adequate services and (2) there is a need. 4. In conclusion the rezone request as submitted should be DENIED, but a recommendation to the City Council of rezoning the subject property to O-P, Office Park, should be made. The applicant in their own statement agrees that an O-P classification would be appropriate if the B-1 classification was denied. The Building and Zoning Department would like to point to the fact that the issue in this case is one of timing of the Comprehensive Plan. If extreme demand for commercial activity is placed on the general neighborhood in the future, there may be a change in the land use classification of the subject site. The applicant has the opportunity in the construction design of the building to place the structure so that a conversion to a commercial use could be done fairly simply and cost effectively in the future if the Comprehensive Plan and ultimate zoning was changed at that time. ' H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: • Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the rezone request by Anton Althoff, file number R-092-85, be denied as submitted but recommended to the City Council to be rezoned to O-P, Office Park. 1. r' I:4d. n • I I I I ' I Ir IJl 1 I 39/ 14019 404 409 . — __ _ ..l1 `"". I .- ..- I 4...., -- .. —f 1 - �'\ ` -- • - i- 1 ♦--/ I I I 11 TIfr. 1 11 // / I I 1 \ Ly, a Syr"�-''. • r / `sr�a �0___1�1.+fir 1 r / I II �\ r SE•.e•.yl l.•+ 1 /, / SIERRA.HEIGHTS 1 • • • , •• - --1- I s+-•E.�' 1� t // // ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I r \ ' __J l �El , I r / : r/ i �— 'E IUG•_ �T7 11 r ' _ R lleYl•'t : / r s ,:! MrP•�1 :;i l r9,.I,9, 2_, ,°I!.)p,r rr•rsr Js,±-1.4 :, ' /1 I. 7114115 47`� . ; �+.Y'p'r.'.' • 'S? o T '1���� 1�t5a',. . 1 S. o _ _'1+�\ . •i- 11 :e i ! :Qi.°�i rry ,i•"rrr•' `I rS � �P� 9 . , e,i, )'... 7fi , ,1 ~-" •gyp`,p 3�. ',. :, .. , +.r . / p�. ‘ SSA r- � '' , +1•�".' t ,il�I- �' r' '�'� :rrr• gfiu�'.'Er,: Y�l�„�.�i ',l.l •d. a`9P=-':•=•�. ; i.•� l' y:.,Ir '. .I�.. jr. T aH s.r,n,r •ru ` . . ,' a. 'may . Nr,y /11,.�.�1•1-'1 t 1:. ! , • :o,. , ,. ., ,....:,I•'I .. t,f.v., , �94r tw. . :° :!'.'t'.•i'\t __-_. ld..r. 1 I:. p �. ,o a> sr rsp tea ur rfi °i �N �. ; a+ryl Ile-• .1513 i• n m� •n r. rq‘ „y., ale V r=s ii. j2. lop �--•� ^ 1... :RY :1:' , �'-rrr:.r,r --- • ,.�' E I tl •2 I ,o,'t!�iy al�� ^ru r•u io, [-404 c— ' T' i ,o. xoL: ir' �or M •1 1 tt a:� ,$fal Tr , • .. . •7 r 11• G'•. y�' '•.�K.' •I L J1Y Ili 1 bl _. ..:F ps at r,. ..•• �77•f�5,-• •!.;. • 1 1 '•,�!,f., l }• re MI .\��+ +Sj`r�`` L h 51 • 1 I 1 �7��1'���.. .-I., I I -p+�,-p, s.s.la�,.�a r�o�rs�'r r(•re' J.-i;,1j, � ■ 11! t I .•.I"�"-_ L tilt ..a..i .,f.• o+'r., 1. ,• 1 r Sr r I 1 rr r- w ::. ;clh15I•: I .J 'ar—_._-__—. f:[ I :S.fir^ t' .. -1 A o R_2EU I _ . \ ii, _.....,,,........_G— z R-3 — �1�e R-3 _ ,1 I I• 1 R_2• .I:`� t� _ ,g.- B—1 I' : 1 . y Il II \N / / ' I . c. , 1 1% %I • J . — !0�^L'rl •13L1 11 \ i i , r 11 —. 1R-2 • •1 .. ' ;.t 1 1 ' 1 '.1 " ' .'. lc'. 1,-•''''i- . i * . ,_, ^r,:_1 .1 G-1 , nA1EN SR ? l (.�R', .1 1 �, 0 • i' Nr 1-c1 V HIGH SCHOOL } ALTHOFF REZONE ' R-092-85 APPL I CANT ANTON AI THOFF TOTAL AREA ± n_R1 ACRF PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E. SUNSET BLVD. EXISTING ZONING R-3,. RESIDENTIAL—MULTIPLE FAMILY EXISTING USE TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES • • PROPOSED USE REZONE OF PROPERTY TO B-1, COMMERCIAL FOR FUTURE COMMERCIAL EVELOPMENT COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN OFFICE/OFFICE PARK COMMENTS 1 • This skstch does not purport to show all highways, roads or easements affecting said property. No liability is assumed for variations in dimensions and location, and is not based upon a survey of the property described. It is furnished without charge, solely for the purpose of assisting in locating premises. Western Pacific Properties, Inc. and or its agents assume no liability for inaccuracies therein. G— • L , '6 lid- --F-- � r • ; �„to `Q0�1 15 G • S Lte 11 � � a i'''' 1111) -= - g I . - '�` ,o'`$� >• y... �I y 'zij l /L` _ a� So S ,S4 . II/ �:�r. ,-.,- . ..3gy3 n I / ,t I —II d v 2 7 \ • il.,i, �� - 1 r �I _� , N 5. ,.. ii Lai .. ,.,.t.r.-A ,,__, ..., 0 • .6. it , , • c_go-re'4: -. 1 1 4...... -5 LC-.) 3?3 - I \ j , _ /.< I ''c V v. • \ 3pL v. F ,.94e- ...........1. i _ L . �^�l l\ 1. r / / 'g9 / 1-- i 1 • . . . . r- ,,,<7. • ' I , 11•6114t. . ni V ,...ii LAND 1P, ELEMENT ( • ' ' Ilh ::':*:::.:: 4•1 . luilir 4 11/Ari; ti.::. . iAgilviiQi 18•11 1111:1111 T Single Family ••••-...-, 'Isl. .....:::: iii:•:-:i Commercial 414,,N Lowe Dnsitymily : , .:::.. .,,,,.. -.A.:::::.........• :::•:•:::... . . „qv, :::::::::::::•:.:.:.: Office / Office Park . . - •:•:•:.:.::::::::::::, Multi-Fa . • . ::::::::::•:•:•:•:•:• \ to •0000000'." ............. .............. ............. Medium Density .00.000. .000.00:000 Public/Quasi-Public ,c? .--, , :..:......................:..:......,..:..:..: ............. .............. ............. •••••••••••••• .•••:.•••:.•••,:.•:.•••,.•••:.•••:.•••:.•••••••••:.•••:.:••••:•::• "--7.-':;:;°: . IMO a .-:•,-,'P., -: L..,-'' •• •::,"'2; it. MUlti-Fanllly .0000000 1g\.) ...,... .,. ... : . ....,..6 High Density , Multi-Family Light Industrial • • • WV -- .4... ..„•-•,,,....,-d,:-.e,&;F.,5?-`•-• d' •,-•••••••• 4:0 ots, '16.111114 illblii:7::---k;-'‘....‘;;-:1.)3•4•6-•••:-1:•7150-t/r-,4.:•c .......`.i••••••-`',C.'••-2!--•••::"!:^•^..--f..?;-: °• !IN:tw- ill!!! ‘--- '••••t.c..f.,•„!..•::,,,-"?,,c ,ro-f:••••.;.: -,e....;;;;:c.::,.....°:K4:15.-. •;.1.,..; .;1..;:•:.• Recreation •••••• • • • Heavy Industrial iiiiiil :°. ' . ---T,,,,,,g,;'• ,, '.7.--5.-c:,•.--.--,7::,-',',i- -- - •-•,1"..c-•.;‘,-" *.;• 11-,...igt \ . . ‘ .'•! •l •• ••• • •-•".•'Y'" Greenbelt _--= Manufacturing Park ,• - / Multiple Option 6 ... . •.., , .. .__I _ •_ \ • 1 ' • - --------..,,•ef;• •• ' •...1 -- ., •• •••• 1••••••••...,.... ... •,,, 1 \ ! \ _._-.• - • • . ::•••.r'-/' •:.X::.A•.i.:*:''tL• •'•. -i' i ' .1 `. ••''. : : 1 --- : i;..'0C'ci\•::: : •:•:: :•';.0.`;`..;\::.,,!•'..,.., . •:).., I-- I;.".-•„3:',' .:i:: ::* I'AU.''L•*);:.... ;: ..ra_. .-:',....,... ' III , . •. -:::::: 'i'.°00* , :::::.: ,. ,z,,,.=,...,:.,.. I , • - ..:::::.: •-,, ..:•.:.::: .......a ;78:Fil-,-..ii,k.4 • . ...c., # .1„,,:l.., >?..,. • imi [2.,:_. 1 i ......1 . , .....,;, 9.,.1, rat, Tr\111 wiliti r ----... -. . A...,. um. , 000930411. jasmo le4 I iiiiiiiiil tam2g4 -0.0000. • .;.,.',. , 1 1 -.-. rat k0000.r_ '--1:1. 1:11i ,c,c,c,00 . ,,,,i,..„„ , •0000.• .2, _r__, • oc,000. . -1W/A11.451' ' • -.. 'OM • 0..00000000 r..,0. L--•••,ki M:1-7 ANIWANyi 00000000• P40-;-'1•?••:• • • •47•Ai\VW •:i::.,, 101 :i:iiiii•,•:i fe.11rArar,:t I 111 Ilit 1111 i .:. ..: :•.:::.60 80000.0000V 6'.5 ,.„ • • e, • ' . :•::::::::•:••••••••rtlinita:-..:-- ..,:ii:'::'::i: AFAimormoN. OEM. it glen •00000• • • •' '-• ' .:':'''''':iii.:':iii --- „„ ..iii ,...14F4 • .• •• • • -r)) ..iiiiiiii&:,,elrilii .::::•:44,10N"...V • • ., 1.11111b0....0$ • . .r.?••.0. • AI • •‘,4: .•:•:•.:.:;.:F.P• NZ. •:::::... ezr4 • •,.• • ... . er.. ,. ., . • • . Wam-- it, MilliElai- • • .e • •. .,i. Iiim:/Tamil 111A8:1,_,..._ to iiiiTo .R.• . • _ .0 • • • • _ .::::::::. , . • • • . ,,• •.:•:•: . • • • • ,.• -::::firmil 7i7".7.-to---0-1- ; PIG 3 • • • • •_••', ' all %.-cf .0• < • • • • • .is.' .f.f. c Ran ..-..:.:•:°°,..000101 -... 'artrr....Cli:I :;°::/;:::°.°°:::...:°:°•i:::i:::::::::;.i:.:.. • • • • • :, .:•:::::i:i:i*•••••'•••:•::::111-1-iki.. e• i :r••••;% 00.;NOVO 0. • • • • • •\ tileitirat..o.ol .... „ •::::::::::::'. ....::i:i:i:iiii:iiii:4 •:•:71, - • • o • • --', i ••••••••••• '-••,53z.'.•,\ NOR" • 7, -.. • • • 0.•• • ,...:-.. '1 ... Alia•;••••;•4•_•//h.i.iii, 11141114 .c6'. Millig. ___, damcgla-WA _ 0-..••P....--777-...--•••••••:;7 i li %s •.......• Nit •0••0• :-.:-:-:•:-:••••••:-:.:.:•:-:•••••.•:.:.:- ri 1118.iiii:.:. •• outs .),•411/. 0.4-n• , .0.00 ;.:•:•;40:::::m.:::::::::: ____.._. .....i • .% _ _ 4 1E11 • • • CI, .7 dot,i4 00.0..0.000. :,:„„„„„,:,:„,::::::.:,:,:,::::,:,:. #,.. 4... ....: aim 10-'A. I'l /: -..°° '•':.2.2 .2:-IL.. 474:: ' i; -- ;;110•11:221 ...:::tililiollsri::iigiffd awassaisi il ---i i .....:::.::if::i::;ii.:' IMmo r.ti '''inewir ."qmi• ' 1 ..i .. .,_ -- II. :':.:: ::::::::-.*-:*: .II:73 -til . "A I) 9 ;A 1 ..:::-:•::::;-:-:::id0::::......... ''0.Ac 6 0 0-0.7o.7o°0oFoo°o°o°o°00°00. ' ..7'I insult es ::.ii: iim:if::- III: min.. 4....,.. ir A. .. , ein.,.•.,..:;..1":::::::::dis.40300000000000.000000::000.0000.00000:0000.00000.0000: ..ms.:....,:,..:::i:::::::::::::::: :.. .: 01 IC • L filgliala,‘1* 44'4. iligir ri.. %.....:•::iiani:::::ii V0:0°00°002710°0*.°10°00:0°0°00°00°00:0:. .::::::: ..000: ••::.:•:•:.:•••. .., 1 -::*...""%* "•-•'-' ..•••• igr ii"Er - '- '''''.... '•' • .".x:::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::. .000000000%.0 1111 0000°00.000. .:•:..: :• ...II a • .:-.;'''''''. .:;' • .: .:. : :.::::Mi.•R::. .0%645°00°00°00•0 0 0 0 0000000.00. 1 n!,....:1..... `1.1• I El ......,,,,, 4 111 Attatiicatere..0 ,.. ;:iii:: ii:iig .0000000000.0.000000000000000000:00.00.00000.0. •1 c.:::::.::::...:.::.:i.: •..,• '19iiitig-r----1 Ar ..• :.: i ••1 T ,•• m move'-. r 4111 . •000 ••:•:•,:.:.:.:.:.:•:•:•:•::.:.:•: •000000 .0000• • ••:•::.:.:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•.:.:,.. 000000000 P.,-, •:e. •• . I •0000•000 •0 o o o• i.•., •:::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:•::::•:•:•: •o op.°o o o o v0000c000c0000000000. it::::.::.:........•....::•:.:-:.:•:.: „ ..000.• •. milor,,,,a r. . en _ o o o o 0• • •:.:.:,:•:•:•:.:•::::•:•:•:.:. •• .,,. ...o0o0o0o0o0o0o0. ,... ....:: •00000• ••• .:•:-:•:•:•:•::::-...:.:.:.:.: • %.421•17.irer/ ..:.'i 'W fi • •00000 & •::::::::::::.:::::::::::::: 0.1 000000000. 4.• :::..••:•:-:.:•:-.:. ?).'1"-•1 iami . ., e'toe. ;Ifi•C•••/ .......C;:.(4,., '.'„. .. 1 1 rig. .. .'V ...it'aiOit:trV•:4-' 1 .•0000•.E;, ::::::::::-::-:::::::::::::::. (1/473 ::::::::::::::.:.:.:.::::: . ,fj. 'Eh ;;;....,'c,..:i.::::::i:::.r ,4'..g,:z.,,..a.;.oo ...c..,4,.. ....:::i..i....i: ..i - ' ...,-,;:;3 !,'?0.-..-°07°,-,.,O,-,.c•: -"-,.-.-6.-' ...•..,:..,.-.,-.,4,,,.•,-.,:-.-•...•..,a,L s,•,s7,,,:.•=_.';•Nr., I -\.%---'':.',,,•:•,•••'•'•'••'••:•.•:•.•:-•.•:•.•"-••-••:*.-.;,.C)•P''.F.,-),-;').':Y:".,::3;,-r:?1;:;.-:•...,;•i;:',,C;7,'..4.'-,;-.,,.n'-;,,-,-,.;;:,".,•r?,"a•s';-3:'.-:::6;•-./6.-,,.7,?:-1,-,l-,v,5g.',',•.?,.,.4.•--•A..)7,..;,1,5:7::-,,,::.•..:::..•,::/...:,.:0::.:,,.:::,:.:,,*::,,:,-..,::,::.::,.:::.:.,:::,:•-,,:::,:.,.,::,, ._. ,...,„,3.•...,,,.,.:.;„,..,,,,.,,...;.:,.„,,....5. ,.,r.,., 0• I A., „, , ? / it. ...el. :• , •, - •,n i •• • ' f • •'''-',....1.''-:':"7o'f•'i-i'.:'. .',°‘"i•-• • .,i •-• j'.44,, ,,,,,Wtirfitip, ."r9,,. .t Ori: ..:i4‘„lik'..••..•.;1' •1143......,eff•`,.••••••.:.•.,)....1 '4.41 ... : 1 .'',AO, "Or- iii[re:Al'c';‘,0.,...,..,•-„0,...,4.•..?. •,.62.,....!•:,...;.•Akeo: ,., . . ,.. :li,,,Q;..,,,c).:•14•. ---,. *1411 ....;,:%,41,,,y,:„,,,.,•;..,•:,;,p,i:'' •:c.•.! P 1.,•ti a f*'.:.,*14/• ... 1 ,,•\..... AI:.q...'W!......t.". ."•••tr,..ge• '..40,...;".VC....7:•,4.;•6 ;•• •1-4.... ...... ..,;,...,;,...::,,i ,..,•,.,...,,,,...?•-,71..-1•:.0,..; ..,.7,,,e).,,,,,),41,..,.;,.....qz.ek,.. ,ir,,,,.,;..,,,,,?.iyrs..,..0." :„.,;.;;;‘..,1,,•r\;:,(,-,,71•;.1-7....z.:0:3 ....„,: ________...\'.:...s...._,.%-:,..ccreccet,:ii...i.i21,...:...rret.,„,;(i.f.rr.....cr,x..0.v:_li.rier;::zet-5,;:11,....;..:?,,21\-C. ;•:--r;!,`;••.?...%--''•jj.•;;;;•;.;:).&...; ilk, 1:„:E•,).•,: ,V.e;0 •,?.'-•,,••kil•,!;•;•.•?f,.;, : ,.7....c.o. -. ._ .-i,.;• ...,,A:.,-..-z,.7., .4,,:,,..: ,. 'A• .•••fi.e7P,„e's,..,:kAr,t'.. •,... ••.:1;•.;•••:,.:,.. .•..1'.•J'''',.•-?,.:•,•;,,ei•J.• •?10.r.i:t7 4....?: I I I.. p..:•.0.00. •L'.'1'4 0. '0 •..."A 2•••• ••` •-''••.. " •.../.• . •*.. -.•':•,...,., r.•;.Y....'4•••,c.4••••& :•..e.. '•••..r.:1:',.:): '4,-',22:2,:,••;1•;•,,TiT,:,C;?,-.,r,,i1 e,'r•,-. '•'‘..:i0C1.°.1i(1-',':'C.'''WO t c•0‘.•l'•••,‘!••4•9•c.7.,•• •••••••.1,...rs...1A....1: , •:•. III C. -•- e ''•':'•r.?.. •••-,••, `, •••' , •..„ ••,. 0 V P. .PA .,....,C 4. ,... :}kte.'0.. ..:,..,305,'S.'1 ‘.1V'/V;1"... . C...C..P.c'.,:.1 v'.,U i..16, •?...t?..9.',.:11 t .1>7..., 'r f•1.:1 ''''.' ''.;.1.1'!'.‘,..(1?''.•.6°''.'-')''.i."'".1‘il.Z;?'i I.* )a...2.).9(1'Cl.^0. a • ••• '7 .IC;?.,..,o,r,..5,41::--..--:•.''' ' '.',.,-..:.;.:,,ir.e.F-4:;:iT :•. • .,; • ,;.,.y.Lo. ,..d.:••••.:<9?---1,' '."0--."..1),.•.. 's-'..... ....'.:31 t'.0,..,°9.-..,- .. , ,..„,,.. 4,...,,, ,••4,• !,:,',..;o CZ,Y.!!(.4•.r.•.0 .,43 re,•. .,,L;,0 0.:4,1;t,I,-„Lv.. i.• Abb ':;:e:f!'.;e e(-41.%.:c'.4:'-:CI'".(.:.1(71*.;•.e"g,.re'!re :":::::.:.. ".•;`•:?1,....,-0.i.,'•,•••••,i5 i..,-...".',•1.:3.A)'• • 0.4.,1.• . 'et t,•01,'ii;',`0 c.r ',..4. '.to'..,...!0‘,....,-,J...,•-• ,..: . - •-Vrt.Vc:_k•e.4,9::Icr:-•,0.e..... k•.,C, ::::::::::::::•. • .1(.0.•,,,,,;,5:`.0/:...12;'4,??.'.,S",.. 'g." 0-o° 0.0• c!'•••.4••• 1),- ‘-'4,k•k).•:''' 1 4'7=cl.s..er:r 611-.45•?(C.:043.;, . ,-. .......... :rt";•'' ''W`'`-`• . *•° 893°A.o %' • .:::57: .,c.c.()%.,•;,•-,•,) ;•f,i, 1,1 ''''::-------•••„______.....L.::: civ.,,.:..,,osc„A.,,,..t.e. ..::::.... , .................... •••••••••• •00000• • ••••:•:•:•:•:•:•:::::::::::::::::::•• :•.;•.,J...0.P. :::'*i:i::::*i::::.:• . .r.''... ..-.'"•''''.'...-.:.?•••"'. . - •• 'PAU .Z.:-:••:•:•:•:::::::•:.2 -..??,!),..,43.: 11.‘\ 1 - 4.' ee"...r..,, •'::::::•:•::::::: ------ . -:a.-•13 •:::•::::::::.:.:.: ',i,..,,..1..";-',.;e;5.•. ..', •,k,„.... .000 0 .is,I.\ 0.000.• YE., "‘.. ‘ .•-i'N'i','•• ' • ______yi;'%ij:.,,, , , , , ------........___. :::::::::::::: : *:.::,:i;i:i .;:;iRi ',.' ;••..4•s. • „c;....,.. . A if2:3 % -..:- \---\r/ ...,.'6!a.• . • • , . •:::•;-:' .:::::.:•:•:•• -: -•...... .i . ......_ 1. ..-.....-. _. Afi _ -.7.... o ...•,..,,,,,•t.',1, •,,:.'....3:•!:,), •2.!:'••„.:•••61.• :If.•,., :A :';'..:7;60 • ....,;.1,i,t,..,,... . 0 \ i • i i-,• 0 0• '••••/ 0 0 0• •0 0 0• •000 •• ••O.0,;:::,1; •z...•N./..OV': .:• Ve:V,,,,,, , IVA'.',AV'..'.t••••13'.61:;;,1‘V:,"1•9.r.",'''',C)•,‘'''1.i.A . oy.&..,k.., .. ::::::::ii;:i:::!':...:.4 , viz tr...a.•, -2_,..,•..tv,o., ......,,i.b.:, ".:;; •...0 • .,. .•,3. •'0'0...i•il , 0 oo oo I "'‘.1, ;•^•'.'','•‘. i,,. (,,y q?.:.-".L4-‘•,• ...... ,.. r••• •••••••••/...‘'.., v:j .•11 i.6.1..;;*: ‘1? (;•::. 4:1iN] :.:•.1...IL •00000• . •00000. .."14/'''t •‘,..a ' :::;;:i:::::::::::,. 71,.• . a • • :4,v• . •• 5...:'..-:•,f1 -,,St2,tLaas_•.1 • '....'.,!••,:, ., .. , . .... • :10:::.; :4:•. 7P..'• t t-i I .,.. f\-\ i f . , , ,'--s,..._ r -Ts.. 9�T6-0 SEP'c ' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MEMORANDUM . MAYOR !, {�- F 1� S `F '. t DATE: November 25, 1985 ' ' NOV 25 1985 E) TO: Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Fred Kaufman, Hearin Examiner FROM: Gene N. Williams, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ALTHOFF REZONE ,We have reviewed the proposed rezone from R-3 to B-1 of the Althoff property on Sunset Boulevard and offer the following comments. While we recognize the limitations of a parcel of property of less than one acre, we cannot support a rezone to B-1. In our view, B-1 zoning would be clearly in conflict with adopted City land use policies. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the area for Office/Office Park type uses. More importantly, the Comprehensive Plan shows Commercial uses only in clearly defined areas. along Sunset Boulevard. There are large Commercial nodes around the Highlands shopping district, at the intersection of Union Avenue and Sunset Boulevard and at Duvall Avenue and Sunset. The City very carefully placed other uses as the appropriate uses between these nodes. The intent was to avoid a strip commercial arterial and to concentrate commercial activities in well defined centers. Written policies of the Comprehensive Plan reinforce this intent: Commercial Development Policy (Page 57) 01 -- Commercial uses developed along ... Sunset Boulevard N.E. should be oriented within shopping centers or other sizeable complexes. #2 -- Strip commercial development should only be allowed when no other design alternative is available. In accord with these policies, the land use designations between the Commercial nodes at Duvall and at Union are Multiple Family north of Sunset Boulevard and Office Park south of Sunset Boulevard. The most appropriate zoning classification to implement this designation is Office Park. In some cases, we would support B-1 zoning to implement such a designation, because many of the uses are similar. However, the conditions or restrictive covenants which would be required for the B-1 zone to avoid the impacts of strip commercial would be tantamount to O-P zoning. Therefore, we believe that O-P zoning is justified for the subject site. Because of the development standards of the O-P zone, the property will be able to accommodate a different style of development. The setbacks and open space standards are greater in O-P. However, through site plan approval, the O-P zone permits reduced setbacks and landscaping by shifting these areas to other portions of the site. Moreover, O-P is not limited to large acreages; there is no minimum lot size in the O-P zone. Therefore, O-P standards are stricter, but adequate development is still permitted. With regard to the permitted uses in O-P versus B-1, many of the same uses are allowed. Retail is permitted in O-P by conditional use when combined with other activities. Business services and all manner of offices and financial activities and even limited indoor manufacturing are permitted in the O-P zone. The key point about the standards and uses of the O-P zone is that most of the impacts of strip commercial activity, which City policy seeks to avoid, are mitigated by employing the O-P zone instead of B-1. In addition, the O-P zone requires site plan approval to examine the specific impacts of future development. Because of the reasons stated above and because the applicant by letter has expressed a willingness to accept O-P zoning as a viable alternative to B-1 zoning, we recommend that a rezone from R-3 to O-P be approved for the property instead of a rezone to B-1. GNW:ss 1510G rill I\VYLL /Y1111 \.VIYL111VIYJ I. ( IYVI 11rrINVVGL -_mJ Ve‘ , • dip bc.144:16 vLd S Gvs-Q.Q- I RECOMMENDATION: [r DNS EJ MITIGATED DNS n EIS • SIc REVIEWED BY: eziJ DATE: // I- ! - •• FORM 1114 RRVTSFf A/1 n/R5 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; ';/,(_,8L1:4_411.1) Ei APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDI IONS El NOT APPROVED -L G-41. : or 2 sp41 c'7! UMR APPROVAL SUBJECT TO _ LATE PI US AGREEMENT-WATER 705 1/14.3/5 s M.Z 79374A X /7i/.ZZ ‘= f 341 .0 UTE COEN HUEEYENT•SEWER NO S•/6 9 .EX ety,e.ED SYSTEM DEVELDPM'ENT CHARGE-WATER }/off• 7 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEWERI y£s SPECIAL ACTT AREA CHARGE-WATER No L SPECIAL A IIT AREA CHARGE-SEWER \/,ES , APPROVED WATER PUN / APPROVED SEWER PUN• 2 , 8 S APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS hh 611 BY FIRE DEPT. . �^� d' FIBS 6 LT7 AN SIS • DATE: /7- .?S - ggr SIGNATURE F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : f l.'/lu / i% /. i'1c , r\l I it/C- 'APPROVED 111 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS EI NOT APPROVED / ' >�•_r.`1`��_.� �j-- /! J!�t/ b fir-=' //L..>r iL 7 I� "a/c� ' 1-1/6) ¢— C « C e , /76 .1C <<,._.,. ` l;' C7 DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR -AUTHORIZED 'REPRESEN ATIVE REVISION 5/1982 RtVIE'WING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED El 'PROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED 11- 77-17 G7'7 DATE: /// '-O .S SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; kch pa (c' -i7G' I I/APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED Ed e //w �� DATE: 19 r SIGNATURE F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 • • 0986N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-115-85 APPLICATION NO(s).: R-092-85 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application to rezone 0.81 acre of property from R-3 to B-1 for future commercial development. PROPONENT: Anton Althoff LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located at 4409 N.E. Sunset Boulevard. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 • Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than December 16, 1985. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: November 26, 1985 ' PUBLICATION DATE: December 2, 1985 4.1 Ronald G. Nelson rr M. Sp ger Building and Zoning Director Policy Dev. ipment I irector Richard C. ughton Public Work Director OF BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT i o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 0 ,x. �� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0,9gTED SEPSE���P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 4, 1985 Mr. Larry Brown 13975 Interurban Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98168 Re: Rezone Application from R-3, Residential, to B-1, Commercial, file R-092-85; property located at 4409 N.E. Sunset Boulevard Dear Mr. Brown: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on November 11, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 17, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:ss 2082Z_.2 cc: Anton Althoff OF R4-, 4$ , 4,a ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT - , RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR mil 4 09 �� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 • O9�TFD SEP1c_0?) BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 4, 1985 Mr. Anton Althoff 9610 Triton Drive N.W. Seattle, Washington 98117 Re: Rezone Application from R-3, Residential, to B-1, Commercial, file R-092-85; property located at 4409 N.E. Sunset Boulevard Dear Mr. Althoff: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on November 11, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 17, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:ss 2082_Z.1 cc: Larry Brown 2079Z NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON DECEMBER 17, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION: ANTON ALTHOFF Application to rezone 0.81 acre of property from R-3, Residential-Multiple Family, to B-1, Commercial, for future commercial development, file number R-092-85; located at 4409 N.E. Sunset Boulevard. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON DECEMBER 17, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : December 6, 1985 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I,I JEANETTE SAMEK-MC KAGUE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. I ' ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington • residing in ICE iv-ro,v , on the ii i day of December, 1985. c. C� � SIGNED• Ji4uL 41,IAtel, -"Maitre_Ki of RA, 4' o O 0,9 ,4TFr) SEPjEM • City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will h®Id a • IC h C` in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON DECEMBER 17, 1985 • BEGINNING AT • q:00 A.M. . P.M. CONCERNING: • R-092-85 113 REZONE From R-3 To B-1 SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT To • • • • SITE APPROVAL I SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVISION of Lott C PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE FROM ri • • GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCAILI) AT 4409 N,E, SUNSET BOULEVARD LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION [] SIGNIFICANT NON-SIGNIFICANT . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING S.ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 .THIS NOTICE NOT ,TO BE REMOVED, WITHOUT „PROPER L AUTHORIZATION: RENTS BUILDING & ZONING DEPPOMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 115 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE 092-85 PROPONENT : ANTON ALTHOFF/LARRY BROWN PROJECT TITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE .81 ACRES FROM. R3 TO B1 LOCATION : 4409 NE SUNSET BLVD TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT y BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Eli POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M, ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : J'S t- N EI APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS la NOT APPROVED <4fg, 41Gib-rp,L2 DATE : SIGNATURE OF D OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPIIIMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET r ECF - 115 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE 092-85 PROPONENT: ANTON ALTHOFF/LARRY BROWN PROJECT TITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE .81 ACRES FROM R3 TO B1 LOCATION : 44.09 NE SUNSET BLVD , TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : El ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION NO FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU „ a PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT O BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT O POLICE DEPARTMENT fl POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT IIII OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING, PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 'Fi2 EE JJ APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED 27a6649,t DATE: 11 Asig " SIGNATU OF DIRECTO OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ;2 REVISION 5/1982 I Form 182 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 115 - 85 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE 092-85 NOV 14 1985 POLICY , PROPONENT: ANTON ALTHOFF/LARRY BROWN DF'/ELOPMFNT nFPr. PROJECT TITLE: APPLICATION TO REZONE .81 ;ACRES FROM R3 TO B1 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: i LOCATION : 4409 NE SUNSET BLVD j TO: if OPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : I , ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION I SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION , FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU „ OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT , BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT JPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT IlOTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON . i REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : P9-4-2r aodryx.. ,-/- El APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CDNDITIONS NOT APPROVED P‘zi-e- --e42- a7tct ci.e.„( ppie.44..4.9. 0"4 V ZS- '24_, f (Ad DATE' -/Y 2S 1,�5 SIGNATURE OF IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT~ BUILDING & ZONING DEPi --MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF — 115 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE 092-85 PROPONENT: ANTON ALTHOFF/LARRY BROWN PROJECT .TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE .81 ACRES FROM R3 TO ,B1 LOCATION : 4409 NE SUNSET BLVD I ! TO: JPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT i SCHEDULED ERC DATE : MENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ® UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT D .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT i , • POLICE DEPARTMENT s OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS 'TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; EJAPPROVED 'APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Ql-�G a �111% DATE: //— If/— g',6 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENTI ' ' BUILDING & ZONING DEPA --- MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 115 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE 092-85 PROPONENT: ANTON ALTHOFF/LARRY BROWN PROJECT TITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE .81 ACRES FROM R3 TO B1 LOCATION : 4409 NE SUNSET BLVD TO: El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : OENGINEERING DIVISION 0 TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ® UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU .• ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT O BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT LI POLICE DEPARTMENT DPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT O OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : G ._PC� -1-1 El APPROVED si APPROVED WITH CONDI IONS El NOT APPROVED itv/2-116C6, j,gc44 : 407 2 5P 3¢S-79UTILTIV APPROVAL S / LATE GOMM A$REEIAEHT-WATER >E5 1N--3/5 ''.Z 7937/ x /W..zz '= # r 341 ,0l LATE COMERS ARREEMENT-SEWER NO S•/6 7 ,X''/�.E'D SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER y,0$ 7-(4_____-K SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEWER y,ES SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-WATER A/O SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER yi6s ;_ ' / APPROVED WATER PLAN - APPROVED SEWER PLAN APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS _ P.---1 ±emu C9 , =i- O ti /� BY FIRE DEPT. .• a _� � .IAA EII F RT.')AN SIS 0)0A/..._, i �jU/t( DATE: //- �J — SIGNATURE F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE gcl- REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEN MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 115 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) ; REZONE 092-85 PROPONENT : ANTON ALTHOFF/LARRY BROWN PROJECT TITLE ; BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE .81 ACRES FROM R3 to B1 LOCATION : 4409 NE SUNSET BLVD TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION - • TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : • UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; T' Nl E•EP l A/6 E APPROVED 111 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED MD P-r /,>/ 770 ' �/ �v ©LLB tCCe_5S F�� �� )-D� z2// 7 A-7«c/ P 5/17 ' P;7ki©c--- G 4 --1-e-7 1/6 t3 p o /L7 - -3 - cam �o DATE; SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED EPRESENT'ATIVE REVISION 5/1982 , Form 182 1 RENTr BUILDING & ZONING DEP&, " MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 115 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE 092-85 PROPONENT: ANTON ALTHOFF/LARRY BROWN PROJECT TITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE .81 ACRES FROM R3 TO B1 . l LOCATION : 4409 NE SUNSET BLVD ' I TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION O TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : • UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT • BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT rt POLICE DEPARTMENT D POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT a OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : "--Z--- -2-/re:-,4 APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED II Ge/e9-7 DATE: //4�T -- SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENTI BUILDING & ZONING DEPA " MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 115 _ 85 V APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE 092-85 PROPONENT: ANTON ALTHOFF/LARRY BROWN PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE .81 ACRES FROM R3 TO B1 LOCATION : 4409 NE SUNSET BLVD TO: OPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : DENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION OFIRE PREVENTION BUREAU EOPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT II .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ) jc& JLC IlCJ I 54PPROVED ® APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ❑ NOT APPROVED R**1,6/Cauy DATE: /�0Y // C35 � 1 ISIGNATURE F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 , , . , . • z-••-•,,:. '-'',f"::'---'n-,,rn:'''-r-'.-•,;:•',:-'7‘1,--- ',',-i:,,-,--f,.- • , , • :;.•-,-: --•,. - .,, . - - ,._ . .. . . . , :,,7. .•,-.•-:'-'.- •=• . . . , . , ' , •' , :.- . . . , , „ . • _ , .., ''i' , 7 4. . . . .,......,.., - • . , . .• . . . , . . , . . ,.. ,„„ .,.. .... , . ENV! ..... NM EN. TAL DECLARATION . . , . ,.. ,....:,..'.„. .. APPLICATION NO. , R4Cfli,-: '', . . • , -, • , ..*. • •,,,... - • ,. . .. --,. PROPOSED ACTIOPAPPI ICATION TO) /OE 0.81 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM ..: .' . R-3 To B-1 FOR FUTURE CattitittliVELOPVENT. ' . . . .....,1 T‘...,• '. • ' . .: ' 1*:t:;1:"'''''' ''' ' •. ' • , L - I ' •••-$ .. •• • • ;. :. - , ' ' ;':.i'fr4"•• ' GENERAL ' LOCATION OR ADDRESS .- .. . . _ • .. • '' •LOCAIED AT 4109 N.E. SUNSET-BOEVARD. . L : . .. . , •;•,... - ,•„. ,,,... ,..•: . , . , . , , . . , . . - . . .. , ,... . ... , . . , _c". . - • ,I1 • , . „ ,. ,,. t — . . .. . -, • • , 1 " ' . • • •••• . . .-' -•.'• , , . . . i,.. L ' • ''-'.:•'..1.'r''','1 i , • , , ., • ' .•".,• .,.;• , . ' , POSTED TO .,,NOTIFY INTERESTED . . ..- . .. • PERSONS OF,' AN . .":ANI ENVIRONMENTAL .1,., ' • :''' L ACTION. . , . . , . • . ,, . . . ... . . . . .. .. , - - ,• . - THE CITY OF - RENTON'': ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW_ COMMITTEE C E..R.C.) '.' HAS DETERMINED THAT THE •- .• ,•.,PROPOSED . ACTION. .' ., • •,- - .. . • • ,. , . , . - . •. . , . ..: . . ,. , . ,, , •, . , , .„ . , . , , _ , , • . .. ODD ES....?.'':-"• •.; p4DOES NOT , .. . . . , . . . . , _. . HAVE A SIGNIFICANT 7 ADVERSE • IMPACT ON THE , • ,..., : . • ,ENVIRONMENT. . . -—• , . --- . . . .• ... .,„,it, :. , •- . . . •• .., .":;,-.:1-'.'--:. - , AN: ENV I RONMEN+4C'IMPACT STATEMENT . . : _ • .,•1.. • • - , , n , •4•. ,•, " • „_ , . , , ''• ; „ ' • ' OVVILL . „. L,... - . - WILL NOT • . , , BE REQUIRED. , '-,-.-:.'. ',:7• - - '. • .. , - -`". ,. . , . . i ' - - : . . • . . . , • . .• THE CITY OF RENT014'14114.1;. NOT:ACT ON THIS • _, .'. PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE 'BELOW. - , ' COMMENTS MUST 'BE, RECEIVED BY . - •-• ... . AN APPEAL OF ' THE ',.1.ABOVE. DETERMINATION MAY ,-•, -: • BE FILED WITH. 37. ii,' , JRENTON HEARING EXAMINER ', BY 5:00 R M., -DOI:1r 16,' i9i65 • . . . . ,;•. , . . , :: ./,'• ..,. • . . , . . ,-. ,,,,..„,.. • „ .„ . _ .. , , . r • ,. • . , , ,, • . , , • , , , , • , . .0 FOR ' FLOMIER INFORMATION .. . •.•,. •-, , . , : .,. • - . CONTACT ...oroi*--,CITY, OF RENTON. .•.:., •,, BUILDINI.4,A1V4.061ING DEPARTMENT ' - -• -•---:'-• ;-,•-•--..--•• - . - . - . "- ---•'• • - • --, . H.' ).4.1.:1.2:357"R550 .• , ', . . , . . . - •i s.‘ .,' - : -'. ': L,-- ,d,•;00:::';'. , ' . . .' ., ' ,. :, : L, •' . , . „ : • . _.,f.,•.,,,,-•.4\tri':•4.-.: ,,,..-.4,..,r.-,-__•_,____,. - :. - ' ' - : ' . , • . ' - ,-- . • . 1::WW',1'41 IE`-:'':- -;7'.•,....' k 91S• g THIS NOTICE • , . •,. .., . . , :: . ••, -, _ •• • , • , .4;t..„.•,•;,-,:tt.„ .,.:::;47,„:.v..••, - . • ... •••, . , . WITOQ. •-.4,,R::'''rr4,-,:,, ::,:' 'a:7.Es., .i.-1Au1dioAtizocrioN . •, . - : : ,' •:, , . ,.,, - . . -.. ... ,. , 0985N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON. WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following projects: ANTON ALTHOFF (ECF-115-85) Application to rezone 0.81 acre of property from R-3 to B-1 for future commercial development, file number R-092-85; located at 4409 N.E. Sunset Boulevard. HARVY DODD AND ASSOCIATES, INC. (ECF-116-85) Application for short plat approval to subdivide 2.42 acres of property into two lots, file number SH.PL-094-85, and application for conditional use permit and for site plan approval to allow the construction of a 5,350 square foot tilt-up concrete dock building with enclosed office space for a truck terminal facility and 'associated warehouse, file numbers CU-093-85 and SA-095-85; located on the west side of East Valley Road at the 2800 block. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by December 16, 1985. Published: December 2. 1985 0986N CITY OF RENTON ' I DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE , I ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-115-85 APPLICATION NO(s).: R-092-85 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application to rezone 0.81 acre of property from R-3 to B-1 for future commercial development. PROPONENT: Anton Althoff LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located at 4409 N.E. Sunset Boulevard. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. (Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee i City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 'APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no !later than December 16, 1985. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: November 26, 1985 ; PUBLICATION DATE: December 2, 1985 Ronald G. Nelson Prr M. Sp, ger Building and Zoning Director Policy Dev: 1pmentI irector Richard C. ughton Public Work Director i OF R4,4, .y THE CITY OF RENTON U 4/ ® 'Z POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 p �°�' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 9,0 ro• 0gT67) SEP"c • BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MEMORANDUM MAYOR CITY 0;,�EZ:NTOM re DATE: November 25, 1985 t- NOV 2 5 1985 • TO: Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator BUILDING,; DEPT, Fred Kaufman, Hearin Examiner s FROM: Gene N. Williams, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ALTHOFF REZONE We have reviewed the proposed rezone from R-3 to B-1 of the Althoff property on Sunset Boulevard and offer the following comments. While we recognize the limitations of a. parcel of_property of less than one acre, we cannot support a rezone to B-1. In our view, B-1 zoning would be clearly in conflict with adopted City land use policies. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the area for Office/Office Park type uses. More importantly,.the Comprehensive Plan shows Commercial uses only in clearly defined areas. along Sunset Boulevard. There are large Commercial nodes around the Highlands shopping district, at the intersection of Union Avenue and Sunset Boulevard and at Duvall Avenue and Sunset. The City very carefully placed other uses as the appropriate uses between these nodes. The intent was to avoid a strip commercial arterial and to concentrate commercial activities in well defined centers. Written policies of the Comprehensive Plan reinforce this intent: Commercial Development Policy (Page 57) #1 --' Commercial uses developed along ... Sunset Boulevard N.E. should be oriented within shopping centers or other sizeable complexes. #2 -- Strip commercial development should only be allowed when no other design alternative is available. In accord with these policies, the land use designations between the Commercial nodes at Duvall and at Union are Multiple Family north of Sunset Boulevard and Office Park south of Sunset Boulevard. The most appropriate zoning classification to implement this designation is Office Park. In some cases, we would support B-1 zoning to implement such a designation, because many of the uses are similar. However, the conditions or restrictive covenants which would be required for the B-1 zone to avoid the impacts of strip commercial would be tantamount to O-P zoning. •Therefore, we believe that O-P zoning is justified for the subject site. P - 2 - Because of the development standards of the O-P zone, the property will be able to accommodate.a different style of development. The setbacks and open space standards are greater in O-P. However, through site plan approval, the O-P zone permits reduced setbacks and landscaping by shifting these areas to other portions of the site. Moreover, O-P is not limited to large acreages; there is no minimum lot size in the O-P zone. Therefore, O-P standards are stricter, but adequate development is still permitted. With regard to the permitted uses in_O-P versus B-1, many of the same uses are allowed. Retail is permitted in O-P by conditional use when combined with other activities. Business services and all manner of offices and financial activities and even limited indoor manufacturing are permitted in the O-P zone. The key point about the standards and uses of the O-P zone is that most of the impacts of strip commercial activity, which City policy seeks to avoid, are mitigated by employing the O-P zone instead of B-1. In addition, the O-P zone requires site plan approval to examine the specific impacts of future development. Because of the reasons stated above and because the applicant by letter has expressed a willingness to accept O-P zoning as a viable alternative to B-1 zoning, we recommend that a rezone from R-3 to O-P be approved for the property instead of a rezone to B-1. GNW:ss 1510G 4i . IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SI REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: "D e S 1c DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 14, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 21, 1985 ECF - 115 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). REZONE 092-85 ' PROPONENT: ANTON ALTHOFF/LARRY-BROWN PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE .81 ACRES FROM R3 TO 81 LOCATION: .4409 NE SUNSET BLVD SITE AREA: 35,456 sq ft BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth '2) Air v- 3) Water 4) Plants `— 'S) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources '� 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use frv- 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: f #1 {i;pyr ; ( ) bt.:(4 G"' �ir �c✓L /�'�cre v QU J �2 �-�• mod s kak . E7Z - .. �../74 RECOMMENDATION: 12rDNS Q MITIGATED DNS El EIS REVIEWED BY: e;64 TITLE: !i, .1 7 DATE: ✓/ ✓4®eiC FORM, #14 REVISED 9/10/85 ' L,.IIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SI'___:ir 2 11- �; REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: F 1 r,C® DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 14, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER. 21, 1985 ECF - 115 - 85 'APPLICATION NO(s). REZONE 092-85 NOV 1 4 1085 PROPONENT: ANTON ALTHOFF/LARRY BROWN PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE .81 ACRES FROM R3 TO B1 LOCATION: .4409 NE SUNSET BLVD • SITE AREA: 35,456 sq ft BUILDING AREA (gross): ' IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION ' 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water ' 4) Plants 5) Animals { 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATIO • VI DNS D MITIGATED DNS El EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: _g2A/14-'6,/214LA DATE: Il FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 LrivIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 14, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 21, 1985 ECF - 115 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). REZONE 092-85 PROPONENT: ANTON ALTHOFF/LARRY BROWN PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE .81 ACRES FROM R3 TO B1 LOCATION: 4409 NE SUNSET BLVD SITE AREA: 35,456 BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth -� 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing L 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: d DNS Q MITIGATED DNS [1 EIS REVIEWED BY: 14 �TITLE: DATE: /.-/3 I FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 ".YIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SI r REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: L. 1 TAB DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 14, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER. 21, 1985 ECF - 115 - 85 % ! APPLICATION NO(s). REZONE 092-85 PROPONENT: ANTON ALTHOFF/LARRY BROWN PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE .81 ACRES FROM R3 TO B1 LOCATION: 4409 NE SUNSET BLVD SITE AREA: 35,456 sq ft 1 BUILDING AREA (gross): 'IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services ✓ 16) Utilities ✓ COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: El DNS �] MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED By: AM TITLE: ate-it '''3,ej.4.7,44.4.2.) DATE: // - gr. FORM ##14 REVISED 9/10/85 r IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SI-,_ _'' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 14, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER. 21, 1985 ECF - 115 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). REZONE 092-85 PROPONENT: ANTON ALTHOFF/LARRY BROWN PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE .81 ACRES FROM R3 TO B1 LOCATION: 4409 NE SUNSET BLVD SITE AREA: 35,456 sq ft BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1). Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants ' . 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 19) Housing .10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation . 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services • 16) Utilities COMMENTS: I , I i RECOMMENDATION: jr DNS 1 E] MITIGATED DNS n ;EIS :e-- REVIEWED BY: TITLE:• / DATE: FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 rVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW St --1" REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ce (1) C DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 14, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER. 21, 1985 ECF - 115 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). REZONE 092-85 PROPONENT: ANTON ALTHOFF/LARRY BROWN PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE .81 ACRES FROM R3 TO B1 LOCATION: 4409 NE SUNSET BLVD SITE AREA: 35,456 sq ft BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 18) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 113) Historic and Cultural Preservation , 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: RI DNS 1 MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: e TITLE: p / DATE: // !/ D S FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 ,.; ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SK,L1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: fxiat .S DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 14, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER. 21, 1985 ECF - 115 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). REZONE 092-85 PROPONENT: ANTON ALTHOFF/LARRY BROWN PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE .81 ACRES FROM R3 TO 81 1 LOCATION: 4409 NE SUNSET BLVD SITE AREA: 35,456 sq ft BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: NS Q MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: P TITLE:1�1�I Qrwiri-1-4-ftvej DATE: I"O )9` l I U _ FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 —IIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SI r REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: O L.IG ' DEV E L.c P DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 14, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER. 21, 1985 ECF - 115 - 85 CITY OF REN ION .APPLICATION NO(s). REZONE 092-85 NOV 14 1985 PROPONENT: ANTON ALTHOFF/LARRY BROWN POLICY rs-v),1_f?PmFMT !WPT. PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE .81 ACRES FROM R3 TO B1 LOCATION: .4409 NE SUNSET BLVD SITE AREA: 35,456 sq ft BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use K 9) Housing . 10) Aesthetics �. X 11) Light and Glare ?C 12) Recreation . 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: bk;i1.0 €4,1.friAervii4"-e-A.,71ilihra_d_j_) kp2zet..444-2-- cfat__ Ct,-.*Cci2cleel RECOMMENDATION: DNS D MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: '`, TITLE: 424-6)...k -/�� ,ate DATE: 1/ 2/er. FORM #14 1 REVISED 9/10/85 ,(m p v J ` � u'ITY OF RENTC -- FILE NO(S): - or.- - C. '� BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT• EL - S �� rc0 A TER APPLICAII® NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific,type of-application(s) are to be completed. i • (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT 1 TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME - FEES • Mr., Anton Althoff • - REZONE*(FROM R3 - TO B1 ) O°� ADDRESS 9610 Triton Drive N.W. � � ® SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP ® TEMPORARY PERMIT* Seattle, Washington 98117 �--�� DITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE 1_ i SITE PLAN APPROVAL 206-782-7466 ® GRADING AND FILLING PERMIT ' No. of Cubic Yards: { Q , VARIANCE CONTACT .PERSON-7-1 From Section: _ . * Justification Required NAME . Larry Brown - ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: • ' 13975. Interurban Avenue South ® SHORT PLAT CITY . ZIP"- ® TENTATIVE PLAT Seattle, Washington . 98168 ED^ PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE CD FINAL PLAT- 206-241-1616 ® WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER . NO. OF LOTS: NAME „ . PLAT NAME: , • Sane as applicant ADDRESS - " PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: ® PRELIMINARY CITY - ' ZIP FINAL $ P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE EJ Residential Industrial Commercial 1 Mixed LOCATION ..., " ® J MOBILE HOME PARKS: • PROPERTY ADDRESS Q TENTATIVE .4409 NE Sunset Blvd.. Rent° , Washington ® PRELIMINARY EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING ' FINAL Rental houses (2) R-3 . . PROPOSED USE', , ` - PARK NAME: Commercial`use ao be determined NUMBER OF SPACES: ® ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE thObla SQ. FT. ACRES, - " " AREA: 35,456 0.81 • TOTAL FEES Z(pt49- CO 1Y K,P`` s°rntA'°"1�,+.arm+. P' F USE ONLY'-- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING- . DATE gT 'Pa 9 s�j ," 1: x2 APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: ..�.►..��-- =' �� Q" -- LArd0V 11 1985 APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: ® Accepted (WILL. 13t¢.l V d�v14�1C_; 4.CLRd1+ k I BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. a Incomplete Notification Sent_On: - - -By: • ` (Initials) DATE ROUTED • ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: '-% J , APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: A--M U Accepted '("H;;t,��; '' ® Incomplete _ Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: Rj Building ,Design Eng. �, Fire Ei Parks [[6 Police 0 Policy Dev. IX Traffic Eng. le Utilities REVISION 8/1882 Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). Lot 2 of Renton Short Plat No. 345-79 as recorded under King County Auditor's file number 7908179008 situate in the Southwest quarter of Section 3, Township 23, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington. • • • AFFIDAVIT I, f"414-1-D+.1 a , being• duly sworn, declare that I am 1 authorized representative to act for the property owner,®owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the , information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS • 31 DAY OF October 198, . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF • WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT Kirkland. Washington' x � �2i � / Larry M. Brown � ��� � Ai (Name of Notary Public) (Signature of Owner) 11715 N.E. 145th Street 9610 Triton Drive.N.W. (Address) • (Address) Kirkland, Washington. Seattle, Washington 98117 = (City) (State) (Zip) 206-782-7466 (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Foam #1.74 CITY OF FE iTO;1 OF R4, ',�, NOV 1 1 985 ECF: �CF-//.S"-A. X s� 4/ 0'. Z CityBetlaelltallpT. O sal -33 0P ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ET) SEP1 '�� Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Althoff Rezone 2. Name of applicant: Anton Althoff 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 9610 Triton Drive N.E. Seattle, Washington 98117 4. Date checklist prepared:10/28/85 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Building & Zoning Department 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): As soon as possible w? p 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. Possible commercial development 6. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. none III 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Easement for culvert Honey Dew Creek1in small area in the S.E. corner of the property. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Rezone Building Permit_in'.the future 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those'answers on this page. . ' • Rezone for future development 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 4409 N.E. Sunset Blvd. - Renton J. The property is situated on the South side Northeast of Sunset Blvd. approximately, 150 feet West of Anacortes. "I ;ICI B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ;III . • 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other flat , b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent.slope)?. 0 2% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Ag C & Rd C d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No 1 - 2 - • I. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. None proposed at this time f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? To be determined h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: N/A 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. None b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: N/A 3. WATER a. Surface: N/A 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Honey Dew Creek in S.E. Corner 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Possibly 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. . N/A - 3 - 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general descripion, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. No 5) Does thw proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site 3lan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Grourk 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No 2) Descrs+e waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. 1-to be determined - Storm Water into Sunset Blvd. System 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No . i. - 4 - d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Storm water system to be designed according to City specs. I - 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ❑ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ❑ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other u Shrubs u grass ❑ crop or grain ❑ Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ❑ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Grass/shrubs c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: as required - 10' on highway 10' on West side, 0 - 12.5' on East side, 10' on South 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other --- Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other --- Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other ---- b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No �f 1 - 5 - I d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, it any: N/A 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. to be determined b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: as required 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: as required b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? traffic - 6 - 2) What types and levals of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Normal traffic 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: as required 8. Land and Shoreline Use • a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Rental houses adjacent East - McDonalds West - Single family b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. two small houses d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? yes - two small houses e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R3 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? 0-P g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? To be determined j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 3 - 4 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: as required - 7 - • 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans. if any: As required 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. 0 b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. 2-low - middle income c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: As required 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. To be determined b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: as required 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: As required - 8 - • 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: As required 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. N.E. Sunset Blvd. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes c. How many parking spaces would the completed.project have? How many would the project eliminate? To be determined d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No - 9 - +• e. Will the ,project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. To be determined g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: As required 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Possibly b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. As required 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. All of the above C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Anton Althoff - 1 0 - #17F 11-8-84, • D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, p1 .,4is and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? To be determined Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: . 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? N/A Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: N/A 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Minimal Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: As required 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains. or prime farmlands? N/A Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: - 11 - 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? N/A Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: N/A IV 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services''and utilities? To be determined ip tl Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Py 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. N/A SIGNATURE I. the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: 07, �/ Name Printed: Anton Althoff ' I• ' b 9P - 12 - CITY OF REI'JiG'J NOV 1 ' FR) ' i�g5 ■ BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC. Commercial Brokerage Company November 7, 1985 The Staff Building and Zoning Department City of Renton, Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Althoff Rezone (R 3 - B 1) Gentlemen: This will serve as notice by the applicant to request the most expeditious process for this rezone. Therefore , should a rezone to B-1 not be supported than the applicant encourages support of a rezone to O-P. The reason ' s for this are simply that an O-P zoning is much closer to B-1 than R-3 and does provide the applicant/owner with more economic opportunities for development or sale in the future . Moreover the time and money saved by both parties is substantial . Thank you for your assistance and consideration. Best regards, WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC. Larry M. Brown LB/ag2. 37 13975 Interurban Avenue South • Seattle,Washington 98168 • (206)241-1616 CITY OF RENVTON NOV 1119 �85 ■ BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC. Commercial Brokerage Company November 7 , 1985 Letter of Justification Althoff Rezone To whom it may concern: 1. One of the primary justifications for a rezone to commercial ( B1) is the existing and changing character of this area to B1 and B1 uses. Some of these are listed below: (Between Duvall & Union) : A. McDonald' s Corporation. B. Albertson' s , Ernst, Pay-n-Save , enter with Burger King and Taco Bell. C. 3 . 67 acres across the Highway from "B" recently rezoned to B-1 . This sold according to the agent representing the seller. D. Sunset Square Retail complex on the N.E. corner of Union and Sunset. E. Buchan Automotive Service Center under construction at the S.W. corner of Whitman Court N.E. and Sunset Highway. This is a 17, 000 square foot center. F. Plaid Pantry convenience store at the S.W. corner of Union and Sunset - soon the be constructed . G. Kinder-Care Day Center soon to be constructed on a one-acre parcel adjacent to the subject site. H. Petro' s Pizza Parlor. 2. Property Size : The comprehensive plan for this parcel indicates office-park (OP) . This is the only parcel ( including it ' s neighbor to the West ) that has been so designated in this area. Office parks are typically developed on large parcels of 2 - 20 acres such as Koll Business Park, Washington Technical Center and others . The office park developements need to be large in order to benefit from the economics of scale and to help create the "park-like" environment. The subject site is only 35, 490 square feet. LB/ag2. 37. 2 13975 Interurban Avenue South • Seattle,Washington 98168 • (206)241-1616 3. There is an increasing demand for commercial products and services in the area. Moreover the amount of zoned commercial land with exposure to the highway is limited to only parcel number lc mentioned earlier. This includes the entire area from Duvall, to I-405 along the Sunset Highway. 4. The applicant expects standard landscaping requirements to help buffer the adjoining residential uses : Rear Yard (R3) - 0 - 10 ' as required East Side Yard (B1) - There is an existing covenant for a 12. 5 foot landscaped buffer. West Side Yard (G1 ) - ? 0-15' as required Front Yard - 10 ' landscaped area Based on the parcel size these landscaped areas represent 23% of the total parcel size . This provides a hardship to this property but most importantly yields adequate buffers to adjacent property uses and their owners. 5. The existing OP code related to landscaping as I understand it could be from 20% on up depending on site plan approval process. 6. Problems with uses in the OP zone - One example of a good use for the property is a bank, however, the OP code does not allow a drive-in window. Thus another reason to support the B-1 zoning. 7. Another problem is the section 4-718 C2. The site is not large enough to economically support a jointly developed complex thus meaning selected services and retail uses have little chance of using this property. With B-1 zoning they are able to go there and utilize the property in it ' s best form. 8. The B-1 zoning would allow mixed use residential uses which may be a very good use for the property. This use is not allowed in OP. Thank you. LB/ag2. 37. 2 \ 11 0 Off/ I� `r D 1 V I V I It ...NC.)• • i'88- 4157- , • VI1 O\ (e sa •83 Zio. z e % Ge F .1, 0 a O (Ci \\, . L oI• N 4,7 t C^ s O ti .V w .\ • (.04 J• _ l f, u lid `i• r, ' v. . ,- _ —, Q ' r 4 - a . I/s�1 F/ •i.4- ,4 ' a • ` ` ? ' `1b a\ At,' •sit + ) y• 4"I S ` ' /4. 17 4 0 j 'Z ; ` S s '; 05 yb 1 -i. i,- / ZS',.Z/E 1 O y , lLvN`' DNI# 44 dCO /� t/-fib, ` I I ,h ,o �`( / I ti S ..'V--' • J .' ,s O v Z. ` ' • `� � s+�s 1 '(T� 1 `yf I/` P �,,���.,�: \ �� L G T 2 o ti LOT I ^� 9 Q� o• °GI r � Q. ,y f,o /I. / Y I , '' LOT 1 ~�. ' ~! REN SP 345-791-790817900E `I • h /64 ss s. \.• C 5 '9-79-O,C 3/4 55 — —„ r. 10 MIr ,- ? I^ I - ° v � r LOT 3 •: � ot ! 588 .59 Q'G r ♦ 1 - I i / yy iF A • T-`c r tiI. • W VrU .�J �t .A� ,, LOT 2 •'tic 1 t '� I �, 1 P LOT 4 :\c f . 56 _ 652' `I+ L 131C 53 • �1 c.�8 4C//Ta r s.SJ ,K,C o � =».ao4u 329 77 j -01 W {----_. , : v ,. . _ • , . . . . . . N -3 N W. 10 23 --5 _d I-_) ici- -.. _ b CITY• Or F:ENTO:a A-ki-AN.oti g.c2_- ••0k)e N L' rrn , i NOV 11 l085 � BUILDING/ZONING DFPT -02 37 A142ND *R 11049 142ND AV SE / 4F1/ S / O 78,800 WA 98055 U-SE-03-23-05 OF W 1/2 OF SW 4OFF SE 1/4 LESS W1150FT 11 1 . 4 .3-01 TIBBLES JACK H 4155 1 VAC 750114 15,000 123,900 0 123,900 16023 SE144TH*RENTON WA 98055 U-NE-03-23-05 1/4 & POR OF S 1/e OF N 1/2 OF SE 1/4 OF NW 13(8.88 10.33 69-00 MIHALTIAN TRAIAN 10016 138TH AV SE 4155 1 SFD 1 25 500 31 700 57,200 1.0 1010 50 10016 138THAVES E*RENTON WA 98055 --M- U-NW-03-23-05 LN OF S 1/2 OF N 1/2 OF SE 1/4 OF law 1/4 TH 6S6.58 .79 )90-07 TRI-DELT INC 4342 1 VAC 790411 67 000 48,700 0 48 700 6840 112TH AVE SE*RENTON WA 98055 U-SE-03-23-05 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SEC LY S OF C/L OF SUNSET 541.98 4.06 )92-05 HENDRICKSON LESTER S 2113 DUVALL AV NE 2122 1 SFD 1 67,000 9,400 76 400 1.0 520 43 PO BOX 429*BRIDGE PORT WA 98813 U-NW-03-23-05 1/2 OF SE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 LY W OF NEWCASTLE R 660.84 2.74 »3-04 ALTHOFF ANTON A 4409 NE SUNSET BL 2105 1 MFD 2 48,400 45,300 93 700 1.0 +1090+41 9610 TRITON DR NW*SEATTLE WA 98117 U-SW-03-23-05 1055.77 .81 )94-03 BEAN THOMAS E 4205 NE 19TH ST 2100 1 SFD 1 24,200 37 600 61 800 1.0 1720 52 4205 NE 19TH*RENTON wA 98055 U-Sw-03-23-05 THA1 POR OF N 1/2 OF N 1/2 OF Sw 1/4 bF Nw 6' 4.96 .37 )95-02 23026A100THRAVERT SE*KENT WA 98031 U-NW-03-25 1 3-05 NE 1/40OF11 NW 1/45LYO0 ELY OFSC000 0 RD LESS N 104 1166.93 .45 9634HUDSON MICHAEL 132ND SE*RENTON+WAROLYN 98056R U-NW-035 -23-05 NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 TH E 1037FT m//L TO SW 3YR 0 0 7817.98 3.57 )97-00 MCDONALD'S (106-46) 4411 NE SUNSET BV 2105 581 2 161,600 338 800 500 400 PO BOX 66207*AMF O'HARE AIRPORT*CHICAGO IL 60666 U-SW-03-23-05 PLAT NO 345-79 RECORDING NO 7908179008 SD P 5658.27 .99 )98244114WUNIONRAVETNE*RENTON WA 98055 2414 UNION AV NE U�NW-03-23 1 3-05 790301190074SD PLAT BEG89577.72 FT9S3&030 6765.06 2080 )99-08 MILLER WENDELL R 4101 NE 25TH PL 2153 1 SFD 1 800908 67,500 20,500 39,200 59 700 1.0 1523462 4101 NE 25TH PL*RENTON WA 98055 U-NW-03-23-05 COR OF GL 4 TH S 88-06-08 E 130 FT TH S 01- 6(2.67 .24 10041355 ADAmS NE 15THRARD C ST*RENTON WA 98055 4135 NE 15TH ST U�SW-03,23-05 113.64 FT OF W 257.29 FT OFF SWO1/4 OF'SW 1/ 56�1.40'0 1292956 IO1� CO � RAE 6 0 16361HMANAVEN *RENTON WA 98056 U�SW-03- A05 1/4 THN8 -24-22E072.37C S 01-10-21 8 . 6 .28 - 102-03 FISHER ROBERT A 9821 148TH AV SE 6855 1 SFD 1 18,000 36,000 54 000 1.08 2880 43 9821 148TH S E*RENTON WA 98055 U-NE-03-23-05 208.708 FT OF W 548 FT OF GL 1 LESS C/M RGT 631.13 1 .00 103134406ASEN99TH*RENTTOD N WA 98055 9803 134TH AV SE U-NW-03-23-05 TH S 78041211 . FT TH,S088-03�41 E0660.84,FT TO 73,600 819 091.0 12.5178 104-01 SNODGRASS GRACE 10244 138TH AV SE 4155 1 MFD 2 841026 56,535 20,000 57,400 77 400 1.0 1660 43 10244 138TH AVE CE*RENTON WA 98056 U-NE-03-23-05 1580.25 FT E & 60 FT N OF Sw COR OF S� 1/4 861.38 .46 106-09 MAY VALLEY COOP CCM INC 6855 1 1,480 1 580 10271 148TH SE*RENTON WA 98056 U-NE-03-23-05 SD SUED TH W 370 FT TO TPOB TH CONTG w1284. 18.47 3.72 108-07 CHARLEY CYNTHIA L 6855 1 VAC 830520 92,000 57,700 0 57 700 14408 SE 100TH ST*RENTON WA 98056 U-NE-03-23-05 W 548 FT OF GL 1 LESS N 744.708 FT LESS C/M 674.37 4.81 6 [ J • CM. OF fENTO� oi_l [ OU if .- NOV 1 1 1985 1985 COPYRIGHT BY WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE REGISTER, INC. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 282-3359. WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE REGISTER BELIEVES THE INFORMATION BELOW TO BE CORRECT, BUT DOES NOT WARRANT 1TS-_ CU ACRACY. THiS INFORMATION IS LEASED FROM AND REMMINS THE PROPERTY OF WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE REG1STER,b I, G/ZONING DEPT. 1Nr, rfr1NTY PARfFt LIST BY AffOoNT NI)MRFP IiNPI ATTED 1985-86 EDITION 1 FNDING . OF FILE FILE TITLE - o9a - :