HomeMy WebLinkAboutREGULAR COUNCIL - 17 Mar 2014 - Agenda - PdfAGENDA
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
March 17, 2014
Monday, 7 p.m.
1.CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2.ROLL CALL
3.SPECIAL PRESENTATION
a. Waste Management Annual Report
b. 2014 City Cultural Diversity Award - National League of Cities & National Black Caucus of Local
Elected Officials
4.ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
5.AUDIENCE COMMENT
(Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The
first comment period is limited to one-half hour. The second comment period later on in the
agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to
the podium and state your name and city of residence for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME.
6.CONSENT AGENDA
The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the
recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further
discussion if requested by a Councilmember.
a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of 3/3/2014. Council concur.
b. City Clerk reports bid opening on 2/27/2014 for CAG-14-018, Monterey Terrace Water Main
Replacement project; 10 bids; engineer’s estimate $1,000,000; and submits staff
recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder, Buno Construction, LLC, in the amount
of $775,073.85. Council concur.
c. Community and Economic Development Department submits 60% Petition to Annex for the
proposed Trace Matthew Annexation and recommends a public hearing be set on 4/7/2014 to
consider the petition and proposed zoning; 4.54 acres bordered by Renton City limits at the
north, 154th Ave. SE to the west, parcel lines in proximity of SE 139th Pl. to the south, and 156th
Ave. SE to the east. Council concur.
d. Community Services Department requests approval to waive picnic shelter fees in the amount of
$280 for the annual CROPWALK event on 5/4/2014. Refer to Finance Committee.
e. Fire & Emergency Services Department requests authorization to convert an Assistant Fire
Marshal position to a Fire Marshal position, resulting in an increased budget of $22,415 for
2014. Refer to Finance Committee.
f. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an addendum to airport lease LAG-93-
004, aircraft hangar storage with BHC, Inc., to increase the total ground lease rate per appraisal
to $30,242.68 annually through 10/28/2018, and to readjust the rate thereafter using the CPI
index. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee.
Page 1 of 126
g. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an addendum to airport lease LAG-12-
004, with Bosair, LLC modifying provisions regarding the demolition of three buildings and
construction of a new hangar at the airport. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee.
h. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with URS Corpororation in
the amount of $191,500 for on-call architectural and engineering services. Refer to
Transportation (Aviation) Committee.
7.UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics
marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held
by the Chair if further review is necessary.
a. Finance Committee: Vouchers; Intitutional Network Agreement with King County*
b. Planning & Development Committee: Amend RMC 4-8-110.E.12.C. - Hearing Examiner
Decisions*; Marijuana Regulations*
c. Utilities Committee: Establish SR 167 Interchange Direct Connector/Talbot Hill Sewer
Relocation Project & Related Engineering Agreement with Stantec Consulting; Second
Addendum to Contract with Soos Creek Water & Sewer District*
8.RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
Resolutions:
a. Interlocal Agreement with King County for Institutional Network (I-Net) service and support
(See 7.a.)
b. Extending the moratorium on the acceptance of applications for business licenses or
permits for medical marijuana businesses; setting a public hearing date on 5/12/2014 (See
7.b.)
c. Second Addendum to contract with Soos Creek Water & Sewer District for Cascade
Interceptor repair (See 7.c.)
Ordinances for first reading:
a. Amend RMC 4-8-110.E.12.C - Hearing Examiner Decisions (See 7.b.)
b. Amend City Code by adding regulations and definitions related to the use, production,
processing, and sales of recreational marijuana (See 7.b.)
Ordinance for second and final reading:
a. Amend RMC 1-3-3, Chronic Nuisance Premises Liens (1st reading 3/3/2014)
9.NEW BUSINESS
(Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded information.)
10.AUDIENCE COMMENT
11.ADJOURNMENT
Page 2 of 126
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA
(Preceding Council Meeting)
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
March 17, 2014
Monday, 6 p.m.
Park Donation Policy
• Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk •
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RECABLECAST:
Tues. & Thurs. at 11 AM & 9 PM, Wed. & Fri at 9 AM & 7 PM and Sat. & Sun. at 1 PM & 9 PM
Page 3 of 126
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Contract Award for Bid Opening on 2/27/2014;
CAG-14-018 Monterey Terrace Water Main
Replacement Project
Meeting:
REGULAR COUNCIL - 17 Mar 2014
Exhibits:
Staff Recommendation
Bid Tab (10 bids)
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
City Clerk
Staff Contact:
Bonnie Walton, City Clerk ext. 6502
Recommended Action:
Council Concur
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ 775,073.85 Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $
Total Project Budget: $ 1,000,000 City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Engineer's Estimate: $1,000,000
In accordance with Council procedure, bids submitted at the subject bid opening met the following three
criteria: There was more than one bid, the low bid was within total project budget, and there were no
irregularities with the low bid. Therefore, staff recommends accepting the low bid submitted by Buno
Construction, LLC, in the amount of $775,073.85 for the Monterey Terrace Water Main Replacement
project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the low bid from Buno Construction, LLC, in the amount of $775,073.85 for the Monterey
Terrace Water Main Replacement project and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign.
6b. - City Clerk reports bid opening on
2/27/2014 for CAG-14-018, Monterey Page 4 of 126
6b. - City Clerk reports bid opening on
2/27/2014 for CAG-14-018, Monterey Page 5 of 126
6b. - City Clerk reports bid opening on 2/27/2014 for CAG-14-018, Monterey Page 6 of 126
6b. - City Clerk reports bid opening on 2/27/2014 for CAG-14-018, Monterey Page 7 of 126
6b. - City Clerk reports bid opening on
2/27/2014 for CAG-14-018, Monterey Page 8 of 126
6b. - City Clerk reports bid opening on
2/27/2014 for CAG-14-018, Monterey Page 9 of 126
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Trace Matthew Annexation – Acceptance of 60%
Direct Petition
Meeting:
REGULAR COUNCIL - 17 Mar 2014
Exhibits:
60% Issue Paper
60% Petition
Annexation Petition Certification
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Community and Economic Development
Staff Contact:
Rocale Timmons, x7219
Recommended Action:
Council concur to set public hearing.
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ 0 Transfer Amendment: $0
Amount Budgeted: $ 0 Revenue Generated: $0
Total Project Budget: $ 0 City Share Total Project: $ 0
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The Council received a 60% Direct Petition to Annex on December 23, 2013, to annex approximately
4.54-acres of unincorporated King County located within Renton’s Potential Annexation Area. The
proponent’s petition has been certified by King County as having signatures representing at least 60%
of the area’s taxable valuation. The area is at the eastern portion of the City limits in the East Renton
Plateau area. It is bordered by Renton City limits at the north, by 154th Ave SE to the west, by parcel
lines in proximity of SE 139th Pl at the south, and 156th Ave SE at the east.
Under State law, the Council is required to hold a public hearing to consider the annexation petition and
the zoning in order to provide interested parties the opportunity to speak. Following the public hearing,
Council may approve the annexation of all or any portion of the area proposed for annexation. The site
is currently designated Residential Low Density (RLD) on the City’s Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map.
The area was prezoned R-4 (allowing four dwelling units per net acre) as part of the East Renton
Plateau prezone (Ordinance #5254).
The Administration is also seeking authorization to forward the Notice of Intent Package to the
Boundary Review Board if Council decides to accept the 60% Direct Petition.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Set April 7, 2014, for a public hearing to consider the 60% Direct Petition and the proposed zoning for
the Trace Matthew Annexation and to authorize the Administration to forward the Notice of Intent
package to the Boundary Review Board for King County.
6c. - Community and Economic
Development Department submits 60% Page 10 of 126
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
& ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:February 27, 2014
TO:Don Persson, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA:Denis Law, Mayor
FROM:C.E. “Chip” Vincent, CED Administrator x6588
STAFF CONTACT:Rocale Timmons, Senior Planner x7219
SUBJECT:Trace Matthew Annexation - Acceptance of 60% Direct
Petition to Annex
ISSUES:
Should Council accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex from the Trace Matthew
Annexation site now that the petition has been certified by the King County Department
of Assessments?
If the City Council accepts the 60% Direct Petition, should the Administration be directed
to forward the Notice of Intent package for this annexation to the Boundary Review
Board?
RECOMMENDATION:
Council accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex the approximately 4.54-
acre Trace Matthew Annexation site;
Council authorize the Administration to forward the Notice of Intent for
the Trace Matthew Annexation to the Boundary Review Board for King
County for their review.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
At its December 2, 2013 public meeting, Council accepted the 10% Notice of Intent to
Commence Annexation petition and authorized the circulation of a 60% Direct Petition
to Annex. City of Renton departments reviewed the annexation proposal and all staff
reported that the annexation represents a logical extension of their respective services
and systems. There were no issues identified that would impede the annexation. A
more detailed discussion of this proposed annexation and review comments are
contained in the Department’s November 18, 2013, Trace Matthew Annexation 10%
Notice of Intent issue paper.
On December 23, 2013, the petitioner submitted the 60% Direct Petition to Annex. That
petition was certified as sufficient, with signatures of property owners representing at
least 60% of the taxable value of the annexation area, by King County on February 12,
2014.
6c. - Community and Economic
Development Department submits 60% Page 11 of 126
Don Persson, Council President
Page 2 of 2
February 27, 2014
Page 2 of 2
Zoning
The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation for the annexation area is
Residential Low Density (RLD). The area was prezoned Residential Four Dwelling Units
per net Acre (R-4) as part of the East Renton Prezone (Ordinance #5254). The R-4
zoning will become effective at the time of annexation.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed Trace Matthew Annexation has been certified as having sufficient
signatures representing at least 60% of the area’s assessed value. It also has reasonable
boundaries and appears to comply with Boundary Review Board objectives. Reviewing
staff raised no objections to this annexation. The proposed Trace Matthew Annexation
furthers the City’s Business Plan goals and is in the general welfare and interest of the
City. The Administration recommends Council accept the 60% Direct Petition and
authorize staff to forward the Notice of Intent package to the Boundary Review Board
for King County.
6c. - Community and Economic
Development Department submits 60% Page 12 of 126
6c. - Community and Economic
Development Department submits 60% Page 13 of 126
6c. - Community and Economic
Development Department submits 60% Page 14 of 126
6c. - Community and Economic
Development Department submits 60% Page 15 of 126
6c. - Community and Economic
Development Department submits 60% Page 16 of 126
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Fee Waiver for Liberty Park and Riverview Park
Picnic Shelters
Meeting:
REGULAR COUNCIL - 17 Mar 2014
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Fee Waiver Request Letter
Fee Waiver Request Form
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Community Services
Staff Contact:
Kris Stimpson, Recreation Director, x6713
Recommended Action:
Refer to Finance Committee
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ $280.00 Transfer Amendment: $0
Amount Budgeted: $ 0 Revenue Generated: $0
Total Project Budget: $ 0 City Share Total Project: $ 0
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The Renton Ecumenical Association of Churches (REACH) “CROP Hunger Walk” is an annual fundraising
event and helps provide funding for local food agency programs. This event has benefitted the Renton
community for 31 years by providing funds for various food agencies such as the Salvation Army of
Renton, ARISE, The Friendly Kitchen, the Margie Williams Helping Hands Center, and St. Vincent de Paul
Food Bank.
They would like to set up starting around 10:00 a.m. The walk begins at 1:30 p.m. and ends at
4:00 p.m. Clean-up ends at about 4:30 or 5:00 p.m.
REACH has provided valuable resources to those in need. They plan to increase service to the Renton
Community again this year. The community will benefit by supporting this effort.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Liberty Park and Riverview Park picnic shelter fee waiver for the CROP Hunger Walk
fundraising event scheduled for May 4, 2014.
6d. - Community Services Department
requests approval to waive picnic shelter Page 17 of 126
COMMUNITY SERVICES
DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:March 17, 2014
TO:Don Persson, Council President
Members of City Council
VIA:Denis Law, Mayor
CC:Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
FROM:Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator
STAFF CONTACT:Kris Stimpson, Recreation Director, extension 6713
SUBJECT:Fee Waiver for Liberty Park and Riverview Park Picnic Shelters
ISSUE:
Should Council authorize the Community Services Department to waive the picnic shelter fees for
the Renton Ecumenical Association of Churches (REACH) “CROP Hunger Walk?”
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Liberty Park and Riverview Park picnic shelter fee waiver for the CROP Hunger
Walk fundraising event scheduled for May 4, 2014.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
The REACH “CROP Hunger Walk” is an annual fundraising event and helps provide funding for local
food agency programs. This event has benefitted the Renton community for 31 years by providing
funds for various food agencies such as the Salvation Army of Renton, ARISE, The Friendly Kitchen,
the Margie Williams Helping Hands Center, and St. Vincent de Paul Food Bank.
CONCLUSION:
REACH has provided valuable resources to those in need. They plan to increase service to the
Renton Community this year. The community will benefit by supporting this effort.
cc:Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator
Kris Stimpson, Community Services, Recreation Manager
Sandy Pilat, Community Services Administrative Assistant
6d. - Community Services Department
requests approval to waive picnic shelter Page 18 of 126
6d. - Community Services Department
requests approval to waive picnic shelter Page 19 of 126
6d. - Community Services Department
requests approval to waive picnic shelter Page 20 of 126
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Conversion of Fire Department Assistant Fire
Marshal Position
Meeting:
REGULAR COUNCIL - 17 Mar 2014
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Draft Fire Marshal Job Description
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Fire & Emergency Services
Staff Contact:
Mark Peterson, Fire Chief/7083
Recommended Action:
Refer to Finance Committee
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure
Required: $ $105,780 Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ $86,784 Revenue Generated: $
Total Project Budget:
$
$22,415 (includes 18% fringe
benefit costs)City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Due to the level of authority required to work with directors and above on high profile projects and have
the required knowledge of codes and issues occurring in the region, it is recommended that the
Assistant Fire Marshal (m26) position be converted to a Fire Marshal (m38) position. As
construction/development projects increase, it will be critical for decisions to be made immediately or
in a timely manner versus waiting for the Chief to intervene. This will result in indirect internal staff
cost savings (for example, CED staff being able to proceed or respond in a timely manner). In addition,
immediate or timely decisions positively impact the customer's bottom line.
The higher level of authority of the Fire Marshal position and decision making will allow the Fire Chief
to focus on other critical department and City-wide functions.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve conversion of Assistant Fire Marshal position to a Fire Marshal position.
6e. - Fire & Emergency Services
Department requests authorization to Page 21 of 126
FIRE & EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:March 11, 2014
TO:Don Persson, Council President
Members of Renton City Council
VIA:Denis Law, Mayor
FROM:Mark Peterson, Fire Chief/Emergency Services Administrator
STAFF CONTACT:Mark Peterson, Fire Chief/Emergency Services Administrator
SUBJECT:Conversion of Fire Department Assistant Fire Marshal
Position
ISSUE:
Should the City convert the vacant Assistant Fire Marshal position in the Fire Department to a Fire
Marshal position?
BACKGROUND:
The Fire Department currently has one budgeted Assistant Fire Marshal position. Prior to becoming
vacant in 2008, a Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal position existed. Due to budgetary constraints in 2009, the
Deputy Chief’s position was eliminated. The Assistant Fire Marshal took on additional duties and the
Fire Chief assumed the duties of the Fire Marshal.
The Assistant Fire Marshall (AFM) cannot make certain decisions that could be made by a Fire Marshal.
Instead, the AFM has to obtain decisions from the Chief. When the AFM works with directors and above
on high profile projects, he does not have the authority to say “yes” or “no.” He cannot hold staff
accountable for taking certain inappropriate actions without getting the Chief involved. Results:
Decisions are delayed by hours or days. This in turn impacts project timelines and customer
response times.
The Chief may not have the technical knowledge to make a decision and needs to do further
research or obtain more information.
Large construction projects often involve decisions that are not “black and white” but in the
“grey” areas, because they require knowledge of codes and issues occurring in the region.
COST:
Replace AFM with a Fire Marshal, resulting in a $22,415 increase to budget in 2014 and a
$24,096 increase in 2015. This increase can be absorbed in the Fire budget.
The Fire Chief currently spends up to 20% of his time on Fire Prevention tasks. A Fire Marshal
will complete those duties, resulting in an indirect cost savings of the Chief’s salary and allowing
the Fire Chief to focus on other critical department and City-wide functions.
6e. - Fire & Emergency Services
Department requests authorization to Page 22 of 126
Don Persson, Council President
Page 2 of 2
March 11, 2014
The AFM salary is low in comparison to internal equity because of overtime the Lead and
Inspector IIIs incur throughout the year. It has become apparent the position is low in the
external market as well because of the inability to attract qualified candidates. In fact, the initial
posting has been pulled and the vacancy will not be filled with that pool of candidates. The
salary range of the AFM should be raised 10%-15%, which would result in a cost increase to
Fire’s budget by approximately $8,600 to $13,000 per year.
As construction/development projects increase, it will be critical for decisions to be made
immediately or in a timely manner versus waiting for the Chief to intervene. This will result in
indirect internal staff cost savings (for example, CED staff being able to proceed or respond in a
timely manner). In addition, immediate or timely decisions positively impact the customer’s
bottom line.
The current structure creates processes that are inefficient and time-consuming, negatively
impacts customer service and results in internal project delays (code revisions, code adoption,
etc.).
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Council approve the conversion of one Assistant Fire Marshal position to a Fire
Marshal position for a higher level of authority and decision making allowing the Fire Chief to focus on
other critical department and City-wide functions.
6e. - Fire & Emergency Services
Department requests authorization to Page 23 of 126
DRAFT
CLASS TITLE:FIRE MARSHAL (FI-1541)
FLSA STATUS:BARGAINING UNIT:PAY RANGE:
Exempt Non-Represented m38
JOB SUMMARY:
Oversee a one-function or small multi-function division. Will have direct and indirect
reports. Direct and control the Community Risk Reduction division in the Fire &
Emergency Services Department, and administer risk reduction-related activities to
include emergency prevention and preparedness, fire code enforcement, and
department/community interaction. Performance management of staff (promote, coach,
mentor, and discipline; terminate with the concurrence of the department administrator).
Division budget preparation and control. Business planning, goal setting, and performance
measures for the division, ensuring business goals are implemented. Policy development,
updates, interpretation, and administration.
SUPERVISION:
Reports To: Fire Chief
Supervises: Assistant Fire Marshal, Lead Fire Inspector, and Fire Inspectors
JOB DUTIES/RESPONSIBILITIES:
Essential Functions:
Manage and oversee the Community Risk Reduction division for the City, providing
leadership and guidance.
Oversee the hiring process within the division, ensuring hiring managers make
effective hiring decisions.
Coach managers and supervisors to consistently utilize performance management
techniques; ensure assigned staff correctly supervise, regularly evaluate, recognize,
and discipline staff; and conduct consistent staff meetings and 1:1 check-in meetings
with direct reports.
Delegate duties to staff as necessary.
Establish, implement, and monitor short and long-range business plans, goals, and
performance measures of the division and department.
Ensure effective customer service, efficient productivity, and functional operations of
the division.
Ensure internal and external complaints and issues are resolved effectively and timely
by staff, and when staff cannot handle, resolve customer concerns regarding both non-
emergency and emergency service delivery, while maintaining positive relations.
6e. - Fire & Emergency Services
Department requests authorization to Page 24 of 126
Fire Marshal - Continued Page 2
Provide technical and policy information to the public, make timely decisions that
affect development, construction, and other projects, resolve internal and external
problems.
Prepare, oversee, and control the division’s annual budget, and monitor and maintain
program accounts.
Attend and/or chair a variety of meetings, boards, and committees.
Communicate with other fire emergency services officials, law enforcement agencies,
City personnel and others regarding areas of mutual concern.
Ensure timely investigation of fire and unauthorized hazardous material releases,
including coordination with the city, county, state and other agencies as applicable.
Develop and implement Community Risk Reduction policies, rules, regulations, and
general orders designed to prevent and minimize the loss of life and property.
Assist in City code revisions and adoption as it relates to Community Risk Reduction.
Oversee the department’s hazardous materials and other technical inspection
programs.
Remain current with relevant technological advancements as it relates to field.
Maintain regular, reliable, and punctual attendance, work evening and/or weekend
hours as assigned, and travel as required.
Standard Functions:
Research, develop, implement, and evaluate codes and ordinances, to include the
preparation of local amendments to State fire codes as required.
Communicate with other fire emergency services officials, law enforcement agencies,
City personnel and others regarding areas of mutual concern.
Prepare and maintain division and department records and reports, prepare various
reports, correspondence, and interdepartmental communication.
Perform other duties as assigned.
EDUCATION, EXPERIENCE, AND LICENSE REQUIREMENTS:
Bachelor's degree in Fire Science or related field.
8-10 years increasingly responsible experience in fire prevention, fire code
enforcement and/or fire investigation..
Or 10-12 years of relevant education and experience.
3 years direct management experience.
Completion of NFPA or IFSAC performance standards for Fire Inspector required.
ICC Fire Inspection Certification required.
Valid drivers’ license required.
KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, AND ABILITIES REQUIREMENTS:
Oral communication and presentation skills.
Written communication skills, ensuring correct grammar, spelling, punctuation and
vocabulary.
6e. - Fire & Emergency Services
Department requests authorization to Page 25 of 126
Fire Marshal - Continued Page 3
Interpersonal skills using tact, patience, and courtesy.
Effective, professional, and positive interactions with difficult individuals.
Leadership and decision-making skills.
Conflict resolution and problem-solving skills.
Detail-oriented and organization skills.
Meet schedules and deadlines.
Ability to:
o Work independently.
o Negotiate viable solutions under a variety of circumstances.
o Analyze situations accurately and adopt an effective course of action.
o Recognize and define fire hazards and recommend actions for abatement.
o Read, interpret, apply and explain rules, regulations, policies and procedures.
o Analyze situations accurately and adopt an effective course of action.
o Negotiate viable solutions under a variety of circumstances.
Knowledge of:
o Fire and building codes as applied to plan review, inspections and enforcement.
o Applicable fire prevention laws, rules, regulations and codes for both the City
and the State.
o Fire hazards and fire prevention and protection methods.
o Fire prevention inspection methods and techniques.
o Fire alarms and sprinkler system operation and design.
o Laws of search, seizure and arrest.
o Word, Excel, and Outlook and related industry-specific software.
WORK ENVIRONMENT/PHYSICAL DEMANDS:
The following represent the physical demands that must be met to successfully perform
the essential functions of this job:
Work is performed in a typical office environment and involves moving throughout
the facility and community.
Constantly operate a computer and other office equipment.
Communicate frequently with City employees and customers.
Driving and field work required.
Night meetings required.
Move items weighing up to 20 pounds on occasion.
Noise level is generally moderately quiet.
Approved reasonable accommodation requests will be made to enable individuals with
disabilities to perform the essential functions of the job.
Established Date: August 2000
Revised: August 2006, December 2006, March 2014
Original Title:
6e. - Fire & Emergency Services
Department requests authorization to Page 26 of 126
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Addendum to BHC, Inc. Lease LAG 93-004
Meeting:
REGULAR COUNCIL - 17 Mar 2014
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Addendum 05-13 to LAG 99-004
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Public Works
Staff Contact:
Ryan Zulauf, Airport Manager (x7471)
Recommended Action:
Refer to Transportation/Aviation Committee
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $$30,242.68
Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
BHC, Inc. leases a 48,778.51 square foot parcel for aircraft hangar storage at 850 West Perimeter Road,
under lease LAG 93-004. The lease allows for a lease rate adjustment every 5 years using a means
other than the Consumer Price Index – Urban. The current base rate of $0.57 per square foot was
established in 2006. In 2009 a market appraisal established a $0.62 per square foot per year rate. BHC,
Inc. will now pay an annual leasehold rate of $30,242.68 (48,778.51 square feet x .62 per leased square
foot); thereby increasing the overall annual airport leasehold revenue by $2,438.93 [(48,778.51 x .05
(new rate of $0.62 - old rate of $0.57)]
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the use of the 2009 market appraisal to increase the lease rate for BHC, Inc. and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign Addendum 05-13 to BHC, Inc.’s lease LAG 93-004.
6f. - Transportation Systems Division
recommends approval of an addendum to Page 27 of 126
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:March 4, 2014
TO:Don Persson, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA:Denis Law, Mayor
FROM:Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator
STAFF CONTACT:Ryan Zulauf, Airport Manager (Extension 7471)
SUBJECT:Addendum to BHC, Inc. Lease LAG 93-004
ISSUE:
Should Council approve a lease rate increase using the 2009 market appraisal for
hangar storage leased in the 850 West Perimeter Road building by BHC, Inc., lease
LAG 93-004?
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the use of the 2009 market appraisal to increase the lease rate for hangar
storage leased in the 850 West Perimeter Road building by BHC, Inc., and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign Addendum 05-13 to BHC, Inc.’s lease LAG 93-004.
BACKGROUND:
BHC, Inc. leases a 48,778.51 square foot parcel at 850 West Perimeter Road under lease
LAG 93-004, for aircraft hangar storage. Their lease allows for a lease rate adjustment
every 5 years using a means other than the Consumer Price Index for All Urban
Consumers.
On April 5, 2013, a certified letter was sent to BHC, Inc. notifying them of the City’s
intent to use a 2009 market appraisal to determine the new lease rate for the next
5-year period. The 2009 market appraisal determined that the new lease rate was to be
increased to $0.62 per square foot per year, which equates to an annual leasehold
amount of $30,242.68, an increase of $2,438.93 annually.
The effective date of this lease rate increase was October 28, 2013, and will continue for
the next 5-year period.
cc:Doug Jacobson, Deputy PW Administrator – Transportation
Carolyn Currie, Transportation Administrative Secretary I
Susan Campbell-Hehr, Airport Secretary
6f. - Transportation Systems Division
recommends approval of an addendum to Page 28 of 126
6f. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an addendum to Page 29 of 126
6f. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an addendum to Page 30 of 126
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Bosair, LLC Lease Amendment 1-14 to LAG 12-
004
Meeting:
REGULAR COUNCIL - 17 Mar 2014
Exhibits:
Amendment 1-14 to LAG 12-004
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Public Works
Staff Contact:
Ryan Zulauf, Airport Manager, (x7473)
Recommended Action:
Refer to Transportation/Aviation Committee
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $
Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The City signed LAG 12-004, a new lease agreement with Bosair, LLC (Bosair) on September 20, 2012, to
allow the demolition of three buildings and the construction of a new hangar at the Airport.
The Amendment changes the following three items in Appendix 2 of the agreement titled, “The Parties’
Schedule of Demolition and Construction:”
1. Section 21: Cost Estimate was modified to reflect an increase in the cost of the new hangar building
being constructed
2. Section 22: Schedule was revised to show a notice to proceed for construction starting March 31,
2014
3. A new Section 23: No Performance Bond Required was added to Appendix 2 of LAG-12-004. The
elimination of the performance bond requirement was included since Bosair has met the same
requirements used to waive the performance bond requirement for Pro-Flight Aviation’s long-term lease
when the Renton Gateway Hanger was under construction.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the following changes listed in Appendix 2 of Amendment 1-14 to Bosair, LLC lease LAG 12-004
and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the amendment that will:
1. Modify the cost estimate to reflect an increase in the cost of the new hangar building being
constructed.
2. Revise the schedule to show a notice to proceed for construction starting March 31, 2014.
3. Eliminate the requirement of a performance bond.
6g. - Transportation Systems Division
recommends approval of an addendum to Page 31 of 126
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:March 10, 2014
TO:Don Persson, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA:Denis Law, Mayor
FROM:Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator
STAFF CONTACT:Ryan Zulauf, Airport Manager(x7473)
SUBJECT:Bosair, LLC Lease Amendment 1-14 to LAG 12-004
ISSUE:
Should Council approve Amendment 1-14 to Bosair, LLC (Bosair) lease agreement
LAG 12-004 to update the building construction schedule for their new building?
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the following changes listed in Appendix 2 of Amendment 1-14 to Bosair, LLC
lease LAG 12-004 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the amendment that
will:
1.Modify the cost estimate to reflect an increase in the cost of the new hangar
building being constructed.
2.Revise the schedule to show a notice to proceed for construction starting
March 31, 2014.
3.Eliminate the requirement of a performance bond.
BACKGROUND:
The City signed LAG 12-004, a new lease agreement with Bosair, LLC (Bosair) on
September 20, 2012, to allow the demolition of three buildings and the construction of
a new hangar at the Airport.
The Amendment changes the following three items in Appendix 2 of the agreement
titled, “The Parties’ Schedule of Demolition and Construction:”
1.Section 21: Cost Estimate was modified to reflect an increase in the cost of the
new hangar building being constructed
2.Section 22: Schedule was revised to show a notice to proceed for construction
starting
March 31, 2014
6g. - Transportation Systems Division
recommends approval of an addendum to Page 32 of 126
Don Persson, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
Page 2 of 2
March 10, 2014
A new Section 23: No Performance Bond Required was added to Appendix 2 of LAG-12-
004. The elimination of the performance bond requirement was included since Bosair
has met the same requirements used to waive the performance bond requirement for
Pro-Flight Aviation’s long-term lease when the Renton Gateway Hanger was under
construction.
cc:Doug Jacobson, Deputy PW Administrator – Transportation
Carolyn Currie, Transportation Administrative Secretary
6g. - Transportation Systems Division
recommends approval of an addendum to Page 33 of 126
6g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an addendum to Page 34 of 126
6g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an addendum to Page 35 of 126
6g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an addendum to Page 36 of 126
6g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an addendum to Page 37 of 126
6g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an addendum to Page 38 of 126
6g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an addendum to Page 39 of 126
6g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an addendum to Page 40 of 126
6g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an addendum to Page 41 of 126
6g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an addendum to Page 42 of 126
6g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an addendum to Page 43 of 126
6g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an addendum to Page 44 of 126
6g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an addendum to Page 45 of 126
6g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an addendum to Page 46 of 126
6g. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an addendum to Page 47 of 126
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Standard Consultant Agreement with URS
Corporation for On-Call Architectural and
Engineering Services
Meeting:
REGULAR COUNCIL - 17 Mar 2014
Exhibits:
Standard Consultant Agreement - URS Corporation
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Public Works
Staff Contact:
Ben Dahle, Airport Civil Engineer, (x7476)
Recommended Action:
Refer to Transportation/Aviation Committee
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ 191,500 Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ 1,923,425 Revenue Generated: $24,400
Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $ 191,500
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The City’s contract with URS Corporation, CAG 12-018, expired on December 31, 2013. Work is not
finished on five of the Airport’s CIP projects under this contract. A new contract has been signed by URS
Corporation, in the amount of $191,500, to complete the Fire Water System Project, 820 Building
Demolition Project, Lower Blast Fence Project, Pavement Management Plan, and advisory services for
the Boeing North Bridge Project. 90% of the costs for the Lower Blast Fence Project are funded by FAA
Grant 24, and 100% of the costs for the Boeing North Bridge Project are reimbursable by The Boeing
Company, reducing the City’s share of the contract to $167,100.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the contract for on-call architectural and engineering services with URS Corporation and
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Standard Consultant Agreement.
6h. - Transportation Systems Division
recommends approval of a contract with Page 48 of 126
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:March 6, 2014
TO:Don Persson, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA:Denis Law, Mayor
FROM:Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator
STAFF CONTACT:Ben Dahle, Airport Civil Engineer (x7476)
SUBJECT:Standard Consultant Agreement with URS Corporation for
On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
ISSUE:
Should the Council approve the standard consultant agreement with URS Corporation
for on-call architectural and engineering services in the amount of $191,500?
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the contract for on-call architectural and engineering services with URS
Corporation and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Standard Consultant
Agreement.
BACKGROUND:
The City contracted with URS Corporation in 2013 under CAG 12-018, for on-call
architectural and engineering work on several Airport CIP projects. The contract expired
on December 31, 2013, and some of the CIP projects have not yet been completed.
The new contract will allow URS Corporation to continue work to complete the Fire
Water System Rehabilitation Project, environmental services for the 820 Building
Demolition Project, architectural and engineering services for work on lowering the
blast fence (with 90% reimbursement by FAA Grant 24), engineering services for the
continuation of replacing aging asphalt under the Pavement Management Plan, and
advisory work for the Boeing North Bridge Project (100% reimbursable by The Boeing
Company).
6h. - Transportation Systems Division
recommends approval of a contract with Page 49 of 126
Don Persson, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
Page 2 of 2
March 6, 2014
A new standard consultant agreement has been signed by URS Corporation, in the
amount of $191,500, to complete the architectural and engineering work on the
following projects:
Project and Account Contract Amount Budget Amount
Fire Water System Rehabilitation
422.725104.016.594.46.63.000
$2,100 $241,603
Pavement Management Program
422.725103.016.594.46.63.000
$6,000 $49,619
Boeing Bridge Phasing
Advisement/Airport Professional
Services
402.000000.016.546.20.41.000
$9,400 $0
(100% reimbursable by
The Boeing Company)
Lower Blast Fence
422.725098.016.594.46.63.000
$150,000 $958,770
(90% FAA Grant 24
reimbursable)
820 Building Demolition
422.725092.016.594.46.63.000
$24,000 $673,433
The budget amounts include the carry forwards from 2013, and are based on actual
year-end project balances upon the close of December 2013.
cc:Doug Jacobson, Deputy PW Administrator – Transportation
Carolyn Currie, Transportation Administrative Secretary I
Susan Campbel-Hehr, Airport Secretary
6h. - Transportation Systems Division
recommends approval of a contract with Page 50 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 51 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 52 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 53 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 54 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 55 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 56 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 57 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 58 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 59 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 60 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 61 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 62 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 63 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 64 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 65 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 66 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 67 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 68 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 69 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 70 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 71 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 72 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 73 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 74 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 75 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 76 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 77 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 78 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 79 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 80 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 81 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 82 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 83 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 84 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 85 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 86 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 87 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 88 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 89 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 90 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 91 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 92 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 93 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 94 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 95 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 96 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 97 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 98 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 99 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 100 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 101 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 102 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 103 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 104 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 105 of 126
6h. - Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Page 106 of 126
8a. - Interlocal Agreement with King
County for Institutional Network (I-Net) Page 107 of 126
8a. - Interlocal Agreement with King
County for Institutional Network (I-Net) Page 108 of 126
8b. - Extending the moratorium on the
acceptance of applications for business Page 109 of 126
8b. - Extending the moratorium on the
acceptance of applications for business Page 110 of 126
8c. - Second Addendum to contract with
Soos Creek Water & Sewer District for Page 111 of 126
8c. - Second Addendum to contract with
Soos Creek Water & Sewer District for Page 112 of 126
8a. - Amend RMC 4-8-110.E.12.C -
Hearing Examiner Decisions (See 7.b.)Page 113 of 126
8a. - Amend RMC 4-8-110.E.12.C -
Hearing Examiner Decisions (See 7.b.)Page 114 of 126
8b. - Amend City Code by adding
regulations and definitions related to the Page 115 of 126
8b. - Amend City Code by adding
regulations and definitions related to the Page 116 of 126
8b. - Amend City Code by adding
regulations and definitions related to the Page 117 of 126
8b. - Amend City Code by adding
regulations and definitions related to the Page 118 of 126
8b. - Amend City Code by adding
regulations and definitions related to the Page 119 of 126
8b. - Amend City Code by adding
regulations and definitions related to the Page 120 of 126
8b. - Amend City Code by adding
regulations and definitions related to the Page 121 of 126
8a. - Amend RMC 1-3-3, Chronic Nuisance
Premises Liens (1st reading 3/3/2014)Page 122 of 126
8a. - Amend RMC 1-3-3, Chronic Nuisance
Premises Liens (1st reading 3/3/2014)Page 123 of 126
8a. - Amend RMC 1-3-3, Chronic Nuisance
Premises Liens (1st reading 3/3/2014)Page 124 of 126
8a. - Amend RMC 1-3-3, Chronic Nuisance
Premises Liens (1st reading 3/3/2014)Page 125 of 126
8a. - Amend RMC 1-3-3, Chronic Nuisance
Premises Liens (1st reading 3/3/2014)Page 126 of 126