Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA97-041 .., IL.Ixvt .,7,11 ,. 7 „1 - u '" ; : J ° . N. •. 38TH I-;�;- „154 ° I NSF=__. x 11! ;;/:: .' 1 E91S 1 IESWI D �9 H.1,1�Jl;a 1�, T'er „EA aU 1• a z ---U I I a CJJ ``Q'6 `I I14o. 4 ;7,irr I2,6;oZ(3) ' AI DEN :OF : , a 31�14[J�brizi-A1 2 .I ' f 1' . vs _ s p � IIS 1; _ - 4 _ �Ll i' eTmaY"_ o _.°1-'1:,. -_�-- V''-.::Q. - _ o I; :,1H ®' 81 a a,'��f __-_7••.� .I___-- I , _ .' SP0'' ' I111 ",, 63 P,<ISSP.]8-]] I1�• W4'':'12: ylr�.��. II -, -__.1„ .._g__"' SP359"]9 j 7p (9, a S.Z ap Ilq- /T`n,__r.3^;• '__ 8L6161 '��ry°�aISL yPYi+<� _�!® - l' __ '"98 I IL II _ pia ui ,n Q�'l ,e e6ID _° V ,I - `, //, ,.1;7- r;y'- ._. _;a.�N. g 37TH ST.sou6 a °L ws3aa - , - - 6'1'. Lis `EI t? i 7u n I -s I,,�_,—, F-J", tz, . . 9 V.^ a II r!”•,. r•7-7fol.-_ 1 a1±5 e j - �' 76" 12 1 4- �IB,.a ICI w, ' ,'-i..- , . - ... F- R 36TH ST \I � l ^sl° _, o"+, 'I .l;,x �I, .aN .36TH - ST vi LJ pII IIL !: 2- i .1 (".3,i. Y , ; • as3w rs,C.T-i h� ( j I'` �,�.I 3,I,�] �I ,y., C .�t ri t b'. I;:� 'I� 5,t-f' „a,,k1 ig1 IL°�i:Pl61-L-,' '----e-Lij�i+.r"'?I-:i?1° :4-.° ��ii "•_..P'`'!LtJ.L: :1„ ,... ' z 66 N. ° 34TH 6 i;J- ,i. .,LJ�.i1;1".7{LsJ'€ -- -- �y7, /�y, st.::: , e {a I i>Y • a,J_,yIF� I';gikif'! i-hall q.,.l y� A4-t+Txx;�x}l,• 5e 4AI:V'.^.�i lel.�iix" 'iB�;ai .•. ` p (. . .' T J - .L1 a 4i : I 4• a a I• ,1 . . P!g;. .i P.114.,4,4I„�' I.'', 1 ,�! I Y1 •'„l' a 'EP= ...-_'" ;—Q,�, I 6?x .. N. 33RD PL. �2l '' ' al 74- a -2. Ifk +yd p ZO '� [.7< !7 Fa 1r7( EY [$ ¢v c EI�. ,L0,-9,4 ::sP 6a e,IsP j . I I I. . i;rF` II` x?1 . 3,;i: " I 1 3 1•,34'3s .:"fh`3a+1/'�31s1' 2P, I,�+•�C — e 3 x• , _2 : 3; III W i-{li I'I '''C �:n,e• v4«9 :11 PIU' i IT_•'d et,•2S• i�1•1 e _®._.. __, [=`01i ..,0JP•o e 'I I 0. U f`f--.Fll--Il''11 • a i• I �N -� I_ I Ni 33RD ST. °Z s . er'•11 8`1 .f W �'I{ W X' 62 I tA�t l;';Lc;:tip• 6; Fi I LIvLS�l AN: 'I 11 16= .,e' s, 1 ,G ,u.N- ' sod° I I` -.FiJ+t.: =,,sr,6LI Ai _.i't> 'Y'' ,'x- N. .. 32ND" _ 7 '' �I .;.4 .1,t1'. S .,M IItR , '.,M,C tJ;C'1'IPEli I ,„C9J 41 ,.'<= I ST 2 Ix O r / f \ `u, 1 'y x1 » , , ____-- 35 `.,L'H:I I I,"/�=es`.• 60, ''A•"`„J�� N. 31ST ST. • t,c: a 38,' IIi' y� 4 Q!n+I Q .6-` '6} It ,6,''•- t,I I I IFII ;zi, -- ---. ' r.A i 3 I - 5•91 58 • 57 �.;1t4-4,•,- �-=.fir-' I.I . N �e • _m� :°',. 1,,.p,• m,,.,0 0?. i 1I ,0 1 c'. l'. s " ' _ 1/ z1' ��._ 3l3 �3, — I ' u, N. 30TH - ST. _ _/' ___ , ;:`,lee-30TH x S,Ts ' . CO6 -, }7I'x-r-x Y4 � r_:!4- -_-+:j} I q' -' '1t I I' Ir o;�;^£ •s; 1 ICI; I C+l A-w' u.'-7 CI,','z!{ �. I 11 ;F! t I �C � `�T war Eva r N. n 29TH sr. ---;40-- 7 ,1 d L r 2 I :___ f�' �_ 'sap1 4+'I •1 'pDI I,,,,Q' Y 1.. - al 1 ,-. r .{f � i II. ��(( .I-�, .,N,,,((y�"CMG' x . ,:1,,I, .1 I I f'T°T2e I a, ,s • �?t p y. III I ,1.• '�--- I5 ' .I:J 14' LJI ti ll a ..." 43 •\ Q ?I•'4 1.1' '1 . N. 28TH. PL. :;_.. � I:1 a '�J4-I� ]�°±'�'�I� ��--��77�!1 I I� �I, ..,,y � x !m�; Is,. ..._.,, II PP :I11. 1_�JLn L_7• Wl tQ1,4 '12�d 01 1 �x'I�; -- !Lz]LS1;;i1$W, •' P�[pP —A LA'S OF SEATTLE �1' , A t -Lal.ems -N,i •—2.8TH_ '—.'_ST,_ NTH- --7-tfo�3�" E Sr KNOLL MAP COMPANY,INC..SEATTLE INS ..,,. ,.,., "I 309W P "'�O1 --^ ' ®. • 1 1 NyQ 4 6° . m 6'CHA.LINK FENCE O,M GONG,FOOTIN NEW 3'-6°HIGH 5 TO'26"E 9 0,2 N _CM LE / CHNK FENC�r I SEEfi / I_yam��Y6-LSE_� �.- `M1 • XX r X XIExi 1 l CONC,PAD SEE •I -. 7 .N DET.365/A-2 I ', I I Ir! al(/�� I in (COORD.W/ELEC.) c/ ,\/ Ii ,s`\I kiI 1 ; spy jR �11I Ei � 0 Ji` J/�� < < a << \I1 t 4�I „ rym v+'` zc� � �cR ' —_— —, 1rA.�- iL H.��gr/� ANTEESlA LccartDN x �� \ 666 '\ IE-22i,9]IN) Q / I r "� a1 - 1U 16=232.63(S) I , 1 DII\ . 11 �- Il BOY"=321 ea MONOPOLE 1II 1 1, �` 4I I c'`" 1 tY PO➢OPOLN i__-- I FOUN DIA J.L �� m 1 1\ \ ,I"II I / EXISTING Q ACTUAL DIA TBD. /� DISCa•WECr/ W N 9m a wa'p" n)1 II I I Ill I ,�FCLIAI INK V BY MONOPOLE O AQ�fi� METER PANEL O T ii•• SEE ELECT.I -,P`1 1 I 1 ;v°a ) I !1 II I IVn I W pl'i' �.'2. a I I I 1 1 I \\ -- n I P 1 ~ I L____J I pp MONOPOLE 1 _...,.1— CABLE TRAY" • O 0 _ �iL ON 1T�U��1 1" I� I- SEE DET 556/A-2 sgn'\'R_���''/oAY. I 1 `w ". .d` „pc —V! �I FEuIOQG. I _ - G I. }I Architects A PlAnvers 4 STL.BOLLARDS: ` II r Co�C \\ aM�z G I e aEF � JnN1 I I W _ SEE DET 335/A-2 —\l}\J y.IL N. Y. PJ ra me .� m� ';a 1 III- ;i °? N d` ry[ •O �l�Y EQUIP.PAD• Z -a R 3-4° ♦ T 0v 1�1 �_R• •Ep'11+ I J EI8 H8•H A880CI�P8B 1,1'1 \IL / C —a -_ !MuftiajeRKEe I d r L ._- 1 " _. ...�..... 1 1 .'1 I�I '�. 'BIDE Y SETBAOX.7 /'l �.e�y„/ �.�..('•e....ewi.e / .OT.OU e26'E t69.02___ -�Lt_ `' fi' .:s'�OI'SCLi.ON 51 1i aP x�1 . J 'x.4�I;� I.a •r•I a• r' EQUIPMENT LOCATION; A m r^S. OECONDARY STRICIURE9 --ud-`.11- ' WO N ALLPIED BEILLEEN REAR Or a el, O I O TOgBEE SUPPLIEDD BY TOWER P C BE'N`� E BTRLCNRE AND REAR PROP. .\ I•31 I. y 14'-9" ♦ l CO LINE AND LOCATED RID PRPROP.ADJ. TE><?CG V�vfl T C' ' f SERVICE le '(..//' I j L J w sTanGN, vl , I d �. U S WEST • BOUNDARY NOTES: ° ' I WIRELESS PROJECT 7 BOUNDARY INsO ATOM SBOBN HEREON IS CALCUL?TED FRGA ' 1 u MN'S LAKERwASHINCTCN CAREEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO ' CC m Y T S` IEATTLE N0.T RECORDED ING IN 4AND F 11 OF PLATS.PAGE 63 ' I X I U7 F KIND COUNTY,CORD v.aS F AND FOUND PROPERT'�CORNERS I U EL LEND IU J FOR wyICH NO RECORD v,as FOUND ' • O , x SITE INFORMATION I U ' C w CONCRETE wet iIS 192200 VERTICAL DATUM t ' <I C5 CCN ETE suRfpCE CONC.PAD NA.'BB [ G EXIST.dsPNALr Ce CATCH BASIN I I' r 12' / r-T, KENNYDALE APTS. BASED ON CITY OF RENTON CONTROL COORDINATES PA�ING-�I I y L 4" I I IE INVERT ELEVATION GRAVEL 1416 N RENT30THON, STREET BENCHMARK I w RATER vtLVE 1 CONC.RET. 7 �/ RENTON,WA WALL,TTP. CITY OF RENTON MONUMENT NUMBER 341,TOP OF VT 1 I ® _ SEA-041 STEEL ROO SET IN CONCRETE MONUMENT IN CASE 3'EAST ' D3 WATER METER - x 0-CENTERLINE INTERSECTION PARK ROE.N.&N 301X ST BOO BOTTOM Or STRUCTURE I DESIGN TYPE ELEVATION.201 26 FEET I + , I I SSMH S.NITARf SERER MANHOLE I NOD RIB HORIZONTAL DATUM' i CONFER TREE x X X x x X is x— OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT `N J AND MONOPOLE 1 DECIDUOLS TREE BASED ON CITY OF RENTON CONTROL COORDINATES ON MON�INENTS 1 O°f I' IS'-3° • T - ANTENNA NUMBER 1836 AND 1886 L _{-———- - I SNEER TITLE N 30TH STREET I o NEW 3'-6°HIGH SEE12/A3 N LINK FENCE; I SITE PLAN/ 2f DETAILS ® EQUIP. LAYOUT PLAN ,riED ®SITE PLAN s• SHEET NUMBER REV. v •ro• CD r'no•- SEA-041A A _ 1 PROPERTY"LINE_____ 0. OAT" REWSIOx EN DIKD APVLS 119_OD Tract 35 1 Tract 36 8 A B'aurvuNK I A E6 8 os` N a _ -I,d°� GRAPHIC SCALE 3'CHAINLINK O`er#. �y i I ` ' m iFENCE e d°I�.L IOC c/ i f'S I FGFND "-may tD f 1 ' / I 1 II A�F NW CONCRETE WALK y _ nl ,('31 I I 1 n �I �` C.S. CONCRETE SURFACE �V J I -[ I• \ I CB CATCH BASIN Js I Tract IE WATER ELEVATION DO WATER VALVE ^^ I 1 Oqx I I I ZP,P, �' ® WATER METER ((`-'Ay`ll) I I.* �I I 1.\\` .. / • IEM22283 N-223.33 ROT BOROM OF STRUCTURE -- ■ E X( SSMH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE - 3 { i,:..' ('.--II'',x BEOT�221.83� #cow CONIFER 1REE MEI■. , I I / •DER' DEODUWS TREE h ��-YYY II' 1 PPaPOToNER I//*._3 Oo[c �\ , �� MONOPOLE —I—' N \ Ad p>4' I II SITE \` - //// BUILDING UNE I(DC O 1 PP L O� • (t'U1 EDGE OF ASPHALT Bd.._Egween,PC ' O 55 Q e' `--.1 1. N (ID)6)11-86518�MS(]f16)T12-C&6 ./` ,-.5(�„PP BOUNDARY NOTES' ry .9 D A d`, ' ®W MARKER BOUNDARS ILN(ERWASHINGiON GAAOENMATION SHOWN OOFIEDENLADDI 0 TO CULMED M A e -G woo g HILLMAN _ 589"G4'?G'E' —T6J,02—cue IN TILE N0.1:RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 R PLATS,PAGE 63 JAt FOUND R®AR h L HI KING FOR COUNTY, ASHI NGTO NF FOUND EN AD PROPERTY CORNERS FOUND 1"IP W/WOOD C � — e`off :`d C N •O`F RINSEL LS/23613 AP C NO l. PLUG k TACK _ —I •" F #` VERTICAL DATUM: `B EC xxl vx Ni lye P a Nr � '-�?�F I I`A NAVO'88 MY'! CO `�---^ / O) / e BASED ON CITY OF RENTON CONTROL COORDINATES. E. • RFNCHMARK' LJ TEXACO SERVICE ' I v I FO CITOF RENTON MONUMENT NUMBER 3/1,TOP OF 5/8" U S WEST CommunicationsN a STATION I O I STO STEEL ROD SET IN CONCRETE MONUMENT IN CASE 3'EAST 3 1; I HO I OF CENTERLINE INTERSECTION PARK AVE.N.4 N.30TH ST. WIRELESS PROJECT ELEVATION.201.26 FEET 0) (/) LT r n I I I I HORIZONTAL DATUM: ., L. J I U I SAD'83(91) 'S "-- BASED ON OTT OF RENTON CONTROL COORDINATES ON MONUMENTS SITE INFORMATION I ¢ I o- - - NUMBER 1836 AND 1886 I / KENNYDALE CELL SITE _ I I %N - LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1416 N.30th STREET _ RENTON,WA / I 1 THE WEST 69 FEET OF THE NORTH 100 FEET OF THE NTH 122D5 FEETZOF TRACT 38,,u.orIMAN'S LAKE 75 FEET OF TRACT 37 AND THE AST SEA-041 I I - WASHINGTO11 GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION i0 SEAT1lE No.1.ACCORDING TO ----\-I\'' : �— w caxc Fip THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 a PLATS,PAGE 63,IN KING DESIGN TYPE _ I COUNTY.wnsHlNcroN; rauo slcN OUTDOOR HEIGHT 108.38' r TOGETHER WITH EASEMENT 10 FEET W WIDTH FOR INSTALLATR AND / I GROUND E EV a 22].8 MAINTENANCE OF SEWER UNE UNDER THE WESTERLY 10 FEET OF THE EAST EQUIPMENT `� I I z Ku SUPPORT 100 FEET OF THE SOUTH 130 FEET OF TRACT 38,HILLAAN'S LAKE Parr MP) WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEATLE No.1,ACCORDING TO AND MONOPOLE THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 R PLATS,PAGE 63,IN KING 0 0 - TO 001 WASHINGTON; u : �—: JI SHEET TIRE TOGETHER SAID EASEMENT 20 FELT D ACROSS FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS TO AND FROM SAID PREMISES OVER AND ACROSS THAT ADDITION Of TRACT HILLMAN'S .37. 1. ACCORDING LAKE WASHINT THEREOF CALF R R EDEN PVOLUME TO OF TREPUT, 1. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT COUNTY.WA.R RECORDED IRI EDLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 63,IN KING ROFSA TRACT TON,DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY N 30th STREET SOUTHWEST NORTH 89. O SAID TRACT 37: THENCE NORTH 89'Of 00"EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT])A DISTANCE OF 9 FEET TO THE TRUE 1.70 OF BEGINNING,THING, THENCE 30NORTHFEET O 30'30"EAST I]1.T8 FEET TO THE NORTH UNE OF THE SHEET NUMBER THEN 1NO FEET OF TRACT EA THENCE NORTH OW 30'30.EAST 20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH OW]0'30"WEST 131.78 FEET TO SAID S0001 UNE OF /\— TRACT ST:ENCE ■/V� THIN.SOUTH 89'Or 00"WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 20 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. DwG NAMe SDAIES IDATE.06/97 70017. 1. • WM Ilild • : r° ANTENNA COAX CABLE& LENGTHS g BA<aw'fiL�'°biD" ANTENNA cow I COAX COAX K K a mo=, SIZE LENGTHS O O ALPHA 2 I-I/4" 95' CI ' m 4 4'-0" (TTPJ G ! MGNOPOLE BETA 2 I-1/4° 95' GAMMA 2 I-1/4" 95' 'OO ANTENNA DOUN-TILT BRACKET GPS 1 I/2° SS. -- -,- ANTENNA i �� TSb°X3°XI/4"X �. �"' F1/ 6°LONG `!/�111 _ BOLTED MOUNTING BRACKET .ACUTMAIDE ,f \ I/ * , 11111.I� 2 VI°DIA'PIPE MOUNT PR MAAR Arror�A �, �� LEFT FRONT REAR8 - o =�� Ief� a r. Pti� , � , N. r/,O. ' 3 `_ 21/4 / / /Ts 3°X 3°X I/4" ' �� T/e"JUMPERLiil -- -, II --xV II aLOWER ANTENNAT14 2 I/2°DIA X 3'-6" COAX ACCESS HLONG STEEL PI- ' �/I*, ama Ir P.i'. Q./ 4 I/4" 4 II/16" 2 3/4° ANTENNA DOWN-TILT -0. ANTENNA MOUNT ACKSON TYPICAL ANTENNA DIMENSIONS 601 Us'n •e P1 m.WW2 lilt I • ARE 1/A1� I°..• BRACKET u aU¢ ess:mi y)•ASIS 'A ANTENNA MOUNT ANTENNA MOUNTING CONFIGURATION !SS& MONOPOLE CONFIG ® ANTENNA CONFIGURATION ® ANTENNA MOUNT It NTS ®eldla r[s e s a e s s B c l e rs e NTS�\\ VI NTS NTS NTS IE= 1 HASSEMBLYANDHOLE FRA ME MONOPOLE WALL I B-o° I U S WEST NNCNOR BOLTS Sig, . LOCATION AND ORIENTATIONS WIRELESS PROJECT 1.i III BEE TOLER PIIFPLIER DUG 6°DIA SCHEDULE 40 CARBON CONCRETE CAP uR�2B 1111111111 II'I,I II mI FM GRADE STEEL PIPE FILLED WITH GROUND 2 II 11 11=,TI" CONCRETE AND PAINTED 1-- GHANDHOLEI♦IIII,I.IIBUSS BAR „IN ACCOTmAICE WTH1 FRAME o 1���1 PAINTING SPECIFICATION 24"BEND 1���� 11111111 RADIUS(TYP) ti Q nD SITE INFORMATION q 111//111 / PRECASADE ANTENNA CABLE p `oRPREGl4T, KENNYDALE APTS. ca-+cREiE PER '^ COVER ASSEMBLY - . 1416 N.30TH STREET b 11�R' Slg 9T GRADE.PAVEMENT — Y E�RUIBE ON RENTON•WA .III• TCVER SUPPLIER OR FIN GRADE T uNlsrraNi ill •= —6°vu.EEE SNO1N DTNERmeE SEA-61: .In• • j rR, r-r- / PI TCBLE OR OR PLA Il����d '��_ _ _ 'I■.I, DESIGN TPE IIII�III o MONOPOLE FNGRADE OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT 1111.111 B M t `�i FOUNDATION AND MONOPOLE 1111111111111111 III■,III II II=7 1 ° ANTENNA II I L IIBE GALVNi1gD HILT E%PtNSION ANCNORB OR ARMORED IIER III„I II IFI I.lI I f EaNI RM EO(000R 4er�22^wE I=11• II=1 1124 UNI9TRUi >.TOR 91g Am LOCATION OF NVCNOR3 Am OTHER SHEET TILE o—I—I—I—N—I=1I: r8mIR0•D:Ni.ROE EmIPMENr VtaDOR DRAwRrie. MIN SOLID TRAY W/OPENING IN BOTTOM FOR GROUNDING DETAILS GUARD POST(BOLLARD) OUTDOOR PAD FOR MINOR EQUIPMENT TYPICAL DRILLED PIER FOUNDATION COAXIAL CABLE TRAY FROM CCA DETAIL •4 DETAIL TO MONOPOLE DETAIL • SHEET NUMBER REV. ' NTS " NTS ® NTS DETAIL ® A 2 I/r=1._D. • • I 3/{•CM4Y£R R IPAN OR FACILITY1mE I \ K g n'o• .•m. LNE POST I I • STD P� GROW"AID 1.01.E FIN co.. S 0 Mil IOO.OL ALL P.M RYP) \ . mCOORDINATE 813E• ° MAIf 'Lh•i.YJII.- LQATIW F.TELCB •f• � '� i , f@T.PCYER AD TE.eo, a+nN.WK FIN YaeADE M euaw I_I- .1-TW 11-" "PIxIDR To FLACRG FABRIC Ia'L=11'EHE,ll • GONOZETE IEIlI�llli IF PCB CAD ET 1. . ,n C _1 . . „) •GRAVEL — 66-Yn.X3.9 OG • �p 80W WN• X{-WOXO a R F-0' I -L r U. 1 • BCReEED Y WD WEEP OG GA EL ¢ _ TTPICK 1ECiIM _-WOVEN WIRE FENCE 10OG _ . 1 p� !=1 J'I 1_'_L;D-Nil 341 I ��n=L!`- 4-1 31-4_. - f a a a a a a £ Nffi F3>s �IlShrl!=1I r I_I�l=Ilc D CC.LIPACTED 803.TO MIN S.MODIFIED E_ I_ ' MAX DEPORT PER ABTA DD5T MTNOD D n)4 `L' •` ' 000EREPORRVIEFff1ED WIN eRE SPECIFIC SOIL • ,�.�'-,I� = . ., lll-1= L FOR CONCRETE NOTESEEDETAIL302. TYPICAL WOVEN WIRE FENCING NOTES O ,y-L I 3a I_I-1!=11-1,III=UI_ 2.GRAVEL 114TLL eS iIWPAI- CRUSHED NAVEL 00MPA0TED^ r__=IJ 1_I' T W SO PERCENT A58NG 1 PYJI SIEVE. &IeGRADE Ili- �'I-''. (INSTALL FENCING PER AVM F.561,SWING GATES PER ASTM F-GOO) _� U-•� T 1 r L CORNER END OR FULL POST 2 1/22°NOMINAL(2B15°OD.) • 3{ scam n 9e•.+W: EQUIPMENT PAD/SLAB ON GRADE • NO FROST CONDITION 2. LINE POST:2"(2315°OD)SCHEDULE 40 PIPE,365 LES/LIN FOOT A� PER ASTM-FI083. p RA°p/NIL CKS N DETAIL A NTa 36 3. TOP RAIL 1 BRACE RAIL: I 1/2°(IBIS°OD)PIPE,2.12 LISS/LIN FOOT CONC. RET WALL 1 • Architects•a PI..o•a 98112 PER ASTM-F1083. O �_ TA ms Fs 206.323.1351(f 4.FABRIC:12 GA CORE WIRE SIZE 2°MESH,CONFORMING TO ASTM-A352. I" F 1'-0" 5.TIE WIRE:MINIMUM II GA GALVANIZED STEEL AT POSTS AND RAILS • 1 I S H S B ASSOCIATES A SINGLE WRAP CF FABRIC TIE AND AT TENSION WIRE BY HOG I.. . ,....... .......- RINGS SPACED MAX 24.INTERVALS. ...°"�w.,a.N, -w ��-•� b.TENSION WIRE:1 GA,GALVANIZED STEEL 6'=jEL EXIST.FENCE • } U S WEST I 3'-6"CHAINLINK FENCE WIRELESS PROJECT STANDARD CIVIL NOTES: STANDARD CONCRETE AND REINFORCING BAR NOTES: I I5'-3° CONC.RET. SITE UIORC L ALL CONCRETE WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACI 301, II '�— WALL SITE INFORMATION I.ALL SITE WORN SHALL BE AS RNDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS AND ACI 31B AND THE SPECIFICATION CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE STIPULATED N THE SPECIFICATION PROJECT SUMMARY. 2.ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MNIMUII COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF I, FN.GRADE KENNYDALE APTS. 2.RUBBISH,STUMPS,DEBRIS,STICKS,STONES AND OTHER RERISE SHALL BE 4000 PSI AT 28 DAYS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE -_ 1416 N.30TH STREET REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY. 3.REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A ES,GRADE SO.DEFORMED 3.THE SITE SHALL BE GRADED TO CAUSE SURFACE WATER TO ROW AWAY UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM 1 II -�� Q F SEA-041 FROM THE PCS EWIR'FNT AND TOLLER AREAS. A 185 LELDED STEEL WIRE FABRIC UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.SPLICES ii j .i ?,: • Rh-IRON,WA CLASS"B°AND ALL HOOKS SHALL BE STANDARD UNO. I L"J C '" ' 4.NO FILL OR E RIANOIIENT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON FROZEN GROOM. �'+'"'�' -. S DESIGN TYPE FROZEN MATERIALS,SNOW OR ICE SHALL NOT BE PLACED M ANT FILL OR 4.THE FOLLCING TEEL UN UNLESS SHORN COVER SHALL D PROVIDED FOR �9 EMBANO'IENT. REINFORCING STEEL UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON DRAWINGS: 5.THE SUBGRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED AND ER000HT TO A SMOOTH UNIFORM CONCRETE CAST AGAINST EARTH'IN. CO,IC.FTC- 6 MONOPOLE LUJ OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT GRADE PRIOR TO THE CRUSHED STONE APPLICATION. AND MONOPOLE CONCRETE EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER 6.ALL EXISTING ACTIVE SEWER WATER GAS,ELECTRIC,AND OTHER UTILITIES EQUIP.PAD ANTENNA UNERE ENCOUNTERED IN THE WORK SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES, YF AND LARGER ______7 IN. BEYOND EXIST. AND WHERE REWIRED FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION CF THE WORK SHALL BE 5 AND SMALLER{UWF ASPHALT RELOCATED AS DIRECTED BY FNGAEERS,EXI R D CAUTION SHOULD BE USED CONCRETE NOT EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER OR NOT CAST SHEET TIC BY THE CONTRACTOR UHEN EXOAVATNG OR PIER DRILLING ARTIND OR NEAR AGAINST THEWALLGROUND: I N IN UTILITIES.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAFETY TRAINING FOR THE WORCING CREW. SLAB AND WALL 3/4 IN. BEAMSAND COLUMNS—I IN (5- CONC.IN. RET-WALL -SIDE ELEVATION DETAILS/NOTES 1.ALL EXISTING INACTIVE SEINER WATER GAS,ELECTRIC AND OTHER UTILITIES, RFREMOV ED 5.3/4°CHAFER OR Ur R TRr31F1 ED EDGES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL 1/4°.1'-O" AND SHALL BE CANED,PLIY•FA OR OTHERWISE DISCONTINUED AT POINTS EXPOSED EDGES OF CONC..UNO.IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 301 SECTION 41A. UH THEWICH WILL NOT INTERFERE WTH THE EXEOOTION OF THE WORK,SWBJEOT TO THE APPROVAL OF ENGNEERNG. 6.HOLES TO RECEIVE EXPANSIONAEDGE ANCHORS SHALL BE IR°LARGER N SHEET NUMBER REV. B.THE AREAS OF THE GUSTO-ERE PROPERTY-DISNR3ED BY THE WORK AND DIAMETER THAN THE ANCHOR BOLT,DOWEL OR ROD AND SHALL CONFORM NOT COVERED BY THE BUILDING,DRIVEWAY OR CRUSHED STONE,SHALL BE TO WIN RECOMMENDATION OJTION FOR EMBEDMENT DEPTH RI LI SNO L IN THE GRADED TO A WNIFORI SLOPE FERTILIZED,SEEDED,AND COVERED WITH THE EL DRAWINGS.AVOID CUTTNG EXISTING REBAR UHEN DRILLING HOLES MULCH AS SFECFIED N THE SPECIFICATION LANDSCAPE LLORC THE ELEVATED SLAB. - 1.NSTALLATION OF CONCRETE EXPMNSIONNIEDGE ANCHOR SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURES WRITTEN RECOMMENDED PROCEDURES. • • USWEST WIRELESS PROJECT INDEX TO DRAWINGS -I TITLE SLEET p SEA-O 41 A-I 917E PLAY,NCNITY DETAILS - 1{ AP A-2 DETAIL PLAN,DETAILS 0 A-3 DETAILS/NOTES E-I ELECTRICALETILS/ PLAY/DETAILS FF E-2 DETAILS N m 0 E-3 DETAILS OWNER AGENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE WEFT ET FEET OF T E NDRnU M2.1S FEET OF TRACT 31 CO TI@ EAST CO FEET OF T E NORTH T°.1S FEET OF TRACT 33. USWEST THE WALTER GROUP ALL AHILLMANS LAKE "`NINGTEL GARDEN OPEDD,ADDI- TION TO SEATTLE NO.L AGCORDP,TO THE PLAT THEREOF 1109 FIRST AVE., #205 RECORDED N VOLIA E P OP RATS,PAGE 03,IN KM CQITY, 1249 NE 145TH STREET aER°w EASEMENT SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98155 SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101 „DFANNEERLENEAVER EWESTER,TN MAN aN E 10 LEE DER PE WESTERLY (206)345-2336 (206)476-8704 FEET OPHE I.EAST 100 FEET OF THE EXSU DO FEET Of TRACT CONTACT' ALEX PERLMAN HLLMAN'SLA EOSHCNTGN`'ARD.CF ED.AEEITION CONTACT' JIM BOWEN TO E SEATTLE NO.L ACCORDING TO THE FLAT THEREOF REC- ORDED M VOLUTE IIO'FLATS,PAGEtFNENGHO ♦pfISTY, 2 1 C • IOT EA.-ENT 20 FEET IN DT FOR PG EFF m \ \ a \a \ 1CONSTRUCTION MANAGER TGTES5OMIDFROASAID PRE9 OVERND ACROSS • PORTION WILLMAN.LAKE WASHINGTON EN ADO M ON TO SEATTLE NO.I,ACCORDS.TO TOT. THE FLAT THEREOF RECORDED N VOLUTE II OF PLATE• PLAT T3,IN KING COUNT.IWSHINGTOFLEE5 TOE.A9 • NG AT THE POSTTEST CORER OF SAID TRACT 31 'X ET. TS CE FORDS EDE O•EAST ALONG TIE SOWN LES:CF SAID • BECHTEL r TRACT 31A DISTANCE CF9 FEET TO THE TRIIE PONT OISEG- U • GNNG. 30•EAST uDF FEET TO PIE NORM °i°�A • 8140 OLD HWY.99 SE • . L T SOY.10FEE FE�CESA TRACT FU0SONO FSTRTH SIT eINE'CF EASTFEET THENCE ET%LHF Sam S WmM1Om TUMWATER,WASHINGTON 98501 FEET TO SAIDSOUTH ONEGOS TRACT 31RR„'`TOTH • WEST ALOE SAID SOHN LINE 20 FEET TO THE TINE CONTACT'ED JENCKES PONT OF DEC... IA ARAII/JACYSQON GENERAL NOTES VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE rna. AFSNIT,�TCF,N P�16 TAL Tj C'R l � - NS.3v SEN 1. I.PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BIDS,THE CONTRACTOR 9.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE WORK, Y SHALL VISIT THE JOBSITE TO REVIEW THE SCOPE OF STORK USING HIS BEST SKILL AND ATTENTION.HE SHALL BE SOLELY N 33 ST. , N AND EXISTING JOB CONDITIONS AFFECTING THE PROPOSED RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS,METHODS, Q Y P I B H S B A B B O C I A T B B DEMOLITION,CONSTRJCTION,MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL TECHNIQUES,SEQUENCES AND PROCEEDURES AND FOR COOK- © N 32 9T. ••• .•-••.., .° INSTALLATIONS,AND OVERALL COORDINATION AND SHALL DINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. _ N 31 ET. Sit I I SITE , ,°,,,--• MAKE PROVISIONS TO THE COST THEREOF.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FAMILIARIZING HIMSELF WITH 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY BECHTEL OF ALL PRODUCTS OR N 30 CT. oil ALL CONTRACT DOCUMENTS,FIELD CONDITIONS AND ITEMS NOTED AS"EXISTING°LL0.11CH ARE NOT IN FIELD.DETAILS t Mi -, DIMENSIONS AND CONFIRMING THAT THE WORK MAY BE ARE INTENDED TO SHOW END RESULTS CF DESIGN.MINOR 1_ NE _In -1' ACCOMPLISHED AS AS SHOWN PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH MODIFGFICAITIONS MAY BE•SE REQUIREDGTO SUIT JOB DISHALL MENSIONS C N 26 SR F I BE LNI EL THE 2.PLANS ARE NOT TO BE SCALED,THE PLANS ARE INTENDED INCLUDED AS PART OF THE WORC ' ' TO BE A DIAGRAMATIC OUTLINE ONLY,UNLESS NOTED WW N 20 ST. OTHERWISE. II.CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM HIGH QUALITY PROFESSIONAL r� , U S WEST UNIFORM JOIN MATERIALS TO IFORM ACCURATE FITS SO THEY 3 3.DEMOLITION IS NOT LIMITED ONLY TO WHAT IS INDICATED ON MEET WITH NEAT,STRAIGHT LINES,FREE OF SMEARS OR OVER- WIRELESS PROJECT THE DRAWINGS.PLANS ARE TO INDICATE THE GENERAL LAPS.INSTALL EXPOSED MATERIALS Am wTIATELY LEVEL, PLUMB,AND AT ACCURATE RIGHT ANGLES OR FLUSH WITH AD- SCOPE OF DEMOLITION REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE PRO- PROJECT SUMMARY JOINING MATERIALS.WORK OF EACH TRADE SHALL MEET ALL JECT AS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS NATIONAL STANDARDS PUBLISHED BY THAT TRADE- VERCAL 9umART.W TN T FORCE AND EFFECT ON THE FSalumTENTS is THE CONTRACT DCNDE2.E,Tre DESCRIPTION AN Tre U.IRK OF THE CONTRACT -- 4.SPACING BETWEEN EQUIPMENT 15 REQUIRED CLEARANCE: 12.DRAWINGS,NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE COMPLIMENTARY. CAN DE SORTARI>EE AS FOLLOW% 511E INFORMATION THEREFORE,IT 19 CRITICAL TO FIELD VERIFY DIMENSIONS. WHAT IS CALLED FOR BY ANY WILL BE BINDING AS IF CALLED TRACSHOULDT THERE BE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE CON- FOR BY ALL. �RIPROVAVETTISCST FOR A'FIFE NTTHFEQUIPMENT ET�T KENNYDALE APTS. TRACT DOCUMENTS,EXISTING CONDITIONS AND/OR DESIGN FaxeL INTENT,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR 13.THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER HAS MADE EVERY EFFORT TO SET W RELEES PROJECT.THE WORK CONEIFTE CF PLACEMENT OF SELF-CONTAINED 1416 NORTH 30TH ST. OBTAINING A CLARIFICATION FROM BECHTEL PRIOR TO FORTH IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS THE COMPLETE SCOPEC.A.FOV0ATION.MabPOLE A'TESIA a0 ASSOCIATED B.WORK PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK,OR RELATED WORN IN OF WORK THE BIDDER IS NEVERTHELESS CAUTIONED THAT EASESTIEMENT, Tire RENTON.EL ST A�FR OF T&PE OPERS LOCATED AT ES NSOTN RENTON, WA QUESTION. MINOR OMISSIONS AND DISCREPANCIES IN THE DRAWINGS MONOPOLE OSiER PAL GALLATION CP OTIE...TENT CP SECLTOAOT PALER SEA-04I • AND SPECIFICATIONS SHALL NOT EXCUSE HIM FROM PROVIDING IS A PART OF THE COTRA:T. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY BECHTEL IN WRITING,AND SHALL A COMPLETED FACILITY AND IMPROVEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE DESIGN TYPE RECEIVE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED BEFORE WITH THE INTENT OF THESE DOCUMENTS.IT WILL BE THE RES • - STARTING WORK ON ANY ITEMS NOT CLEARLY DEFINED OR PONSIBILITY OF THE BIDDER TO BRING ANT CONFLICTS, • OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT OR IDENTIFIED BY THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS OMISSIONS, WRITTEN FORMAT, OR DISCREPANCIES,PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF PROPOSAL.BECHTEL • PROJECT DATA AND MONOPOLE 6.INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EVENT OF DISCRPANCIES CONTRACTOR SHALL PRICE THE CONSTRICTION TYPE. MR ANTENNA MANUFACTURER'S RECOMENDATIONS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHER- MORE EXPENSIVE OR EXTENSIVE WORK,UNLESS DIRECTED _ WISE INDICATED OR US-GRE LOCAL CODES OR REGULATIONS OTHERWISE. 00CUR TAKE PRECIDENCE. SELECTED CND.CODE, PDC FAA SHEET TIC T.VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS AND ON THE SITE, 14.THIS SITE REQUIRES FAA LIGHTS ON MONOPOLE.THE BASE STATION .OF STORES AND NOTIFY BECHTEL OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE MUST BE OPERATIONAL WITH POWER AND COMMUNICATION FACILITIES 20',,,,G LNG 2Horsr T R d eourN.C. LEGAL DESCRIPTION/ STARTING WOW. AVAILABLE BEFORE THE MONOPOLE CAN BE ERECTED. NEST R E B.ALL WORE PERFORMED AND MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL NOTES/VICINITY MAP MEET THE STRICTTRICT ACCORDANCE AS A MINIMUM STANDARD, WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES,REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES ASSESSORS PARLEL IFI'IDED EOSCDauO-ES HAVING JURISDICTION.CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE ALL NOTICES ARSDICTIO4 CI,CP RENTON SHEET NUMBER REV. AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS,ORDINANCES,RULES,REGULA- TIONS,AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY BEAR- �I ' WI ING ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE ORC ALL ELECTRICAL e •'1� SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL u APPLICABLE MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS, AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL CODES,ORDINANCES AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. ...- '. . .,. Li- t. (DI it lel] :t\-.3 ...c1450*.; 'Toteld it'A'4!1 L° • '-'/0/0 '' ..o . rgiv il lit,--- -- -14- 1 1----- _.... _ -- --- --- b. . ft W2 . 0 _ 94-7; ,..(3/ - z E13;_. ';- :'99' z 4 % _ z _ , • _7, „ " ti_...-7-4!ii . • . . ir...... .__. ii< .. ,. :_.... ,ni -g..- -EFT X • N ic- ---`-': i.::,,?., .. 21.A •3 - . , _. .._. _......_..._.._ _. . ...,,,,. - , , 3g, s. :16119 . us ,F2k"--,..,- • ....I .• Cu --..,i .r, o w b u., CI) .?..3 . I R; 14a]tv , - • r ,aq._14,Thi_f•-• ,..„,,'--...•.•Ti:' 0/ I I - WPM . p... , :tje g die/a . .•----- .-..•-- • .. ., ...i. _‘.__- 7;.Q; ZLIK2P' -- _--.••__...-r_ i; tmal .. z-., . ____..., .. ....4 i. „ , .... . ,y, *7 4.- oi - "!.;*kir--F; - --, .-----..---gal..e. /7/. 0..1 riiiogk-.4 Fiat, 0..1 tf, • . g ,im : 1\) ., :,. 1 .. 2 '' • 's - N.) -1 I ' t (XI ' •- (A -i"-- . - . SII!-t\/_/24- ---- i• - •.-CO _, , -40 OE• ch 5 .,, . --I ,-!_. _.t c-_,La'On 11,,,----1-f.I. n,LI; --1 1,5; ,111114,T L a, 'IV 611" " E..i I 11-- "Uri.; "I' ._..1. .....7 0 - 0-- - I- - .----- -. -----Hi- . C7 1 411-;11u1 (.4 ir - ... 1 '71:•/43, ''';• " .4-.;,-. -• -r3 r/. . c-, (..... lir!..-z___..-.. l..11 I, "r` '---. L'Ut 5,- ' ' 'i tr, I --a-, --------Ir._ c71 104"• A-1.1- -...ii..-- - ------ _ - - I . cd : - c.. :- ' Z.a . me 4-!. T .-"1 -AI ii-.> 4'' ••13' N ,/7 g •E . •. co 4% ' 1 - ii z.. 1 1'1' • i`j..-4 `,':,' -t__ _ _ . --....._, •----- • •••• . ._ -_.. . .....-. --.•---• •--, ----,__,---- '-' . •'• ---- - ......._4_ - 1 4,/e/1 • .13 8,-..-4,..! Elt17. ti) - t'i! 72 ' Z c...: 11_;;._ _ Y.1 '11•••' ')! (f) </, L., l'__E°Z___„: U) .2_..!`;!_ ._ t...• t Ca -' , -....--.• .--. r ,.-„r1-:-.4 -__,-,---- --I ---....:--41,,' - I -.-- • --- - .. .1:F1-1- -I - ,x1 , vt-i-,s• z - v . . _ • - ,,, (:), 1 .,, . , // 4U 7-Vii 'rt. -coded . - l''.., 71)Ks - _.... _...Lii 247_5° • :„, ..7---: . I.' "---- r?Mo, .4 ,..., Li. r•••• - 'Ij '6) • . 521 'L.' ,.., fy -[1_32'2 i -go,? ',..i.. • - s'--.' _lit r8' ' 41{-_, -.4,, c., 30 -- --- -----• I- -----11-----• •- lt •...f, Oa: • t-r• ,..,0 o 0 rhs 1 2_ .,+Li' !--EP ,-',it N' cp N, 742 111- 3 - 1 I ----- n:r • • -1 Lf- i ...; ;- NI G-7 • - ,• 1 1 l") -t,,:'-' V- Is' I " •53 l''II114-N 'E-_-_]`.s.' rs • 1/2/4.0 41 ,I2 '''. • co 1.1 . O'n 0' V ' ------A-4-- •• 4Z.61 1 1 i ' z - gil /7 l ' T•140 [1 . r 3. `,8;12:11 • I 0 .,_ 1 i -1/2- 147;- 4• -• •- .••• • • - 0 --1 I __zi _ ___..... _________ 1 • Itty; , r, ru, I • V .b. ''A •'0: MM.. 1:99 a. • 11--"- 'Zi r•i'•09' Z.;---r`.)-T.1_._N..___`;1_ -I . 1 % !____ , .i, •;' itil - = 'f•"'-. = 14------ 50 no 11 cr• ION 011 C. ' 3 \ 102 so , ;o2 0Z • • 5o at _ :“2L51 t a' Ili ,mitu " '''' 104 iz. (" " t' 102 os lid.11 to ' so `GO , ' /I 1-4".:23 PI '''' -••11 , '' So '. ..,,:. (') r t PARK 1 AVE N , 1 i--- - 90 ii 90 f;I 1221 51 75 So .....:s..r, I 65 •; 40 60 ' 75 I I 223.5 6.' I25 I 75 c...,4,1 I 412.7s 102.7.5Il 1,.... e.--7 i 00 " 70.5 I.No.5111 75 1)7-r.F, z I I I. 1 1 1II,-- .I r--IT:5-13 - I s al i I : .FA. g, I . -NT I LE2,.•?s•ci i_ I I kj 1 I 1 -.5 o co -4414 I 'I' I II I 1! 1 4.14.1 11 I t, -I ' ETu j I. 1 tC.3 "I NJ •1' N u.1• 00 -4 - try i • • f.; ,-4k1(11 I 1 , , J. 0 . ,..., ......, ., a I-' I 7..:3 I I hamar I I I '.7.41110. I b --•••I ' (...,11 I I I II% I I . :E• . to .• II 0 la j--I cn 1 -- ---,-1,- . g ' /0.9 2 rai ao: ro .._,3 _ Zhu, •.•,1, 1 tSi tr•A"- -Fq2--li • .ii•- I r., (-N.-I I Q' (0-11'-V, _NI 4! 1 1 ii -• li 1 CO U) I Immo. ' ts. • 1 /341_--_oi:.', 1/) ,I-1 ' N' W oils, I bo U.3 I • (.., I 1 , 41:11 1.-1..A.'•;. 10.t. 7.1Cn 75 - .-• I I I NI I • i: I ::11/ 1r a3// 0 ii, 1 2:4 5 i 150 7 1.54.s'' li 1 114.5 . , 304.S' ./. 2 12' _ 120 J . 182 ib , 304.73 . . LA I /30.2 . 0,7 57 , 7867.538 (n90 2',0 7590 1 '2,2_....) \ ....., .1_ 130 1 3 - i• \ I-H 1 •ln „...iii--- --- ,, ir-17 5; 14 '.•! .. 621=1:2.:cir ., .'71 114. 2 _.43,41 iil__ T v, , co _ „ 82 ..._ , N.' -or-1 I-, If,_ 1 _IN 304.S ___ oot 4) di e.INA---''' U.) 50275 "------LLe, - --- ISO , a 171 CO EMMA N) .1: Om 15275 0/2 it-/-- -- -- 7z ___ 13._ 302.1S ..... ..._ 'ED I '- • 11 -II 1 1 n is."I of. • • k- - •-t>----- --- s'o •'•'• 136 1 1 {12 °' I, o, .. r•-/- -sr .1- cn 1!••• /F-Li ,,,__co V•......... ...,"(••,2 7 6(.,41 p,e”.1`..f/ -.1., I oi I ___• _ (,,Kr:....L 111471 ._ ....1.;••- CI -7 4,.. ,J1 71 -•.1 , CO I SERVICE' '70-'......___ , ,;2711 1 \\\....._. 7......._. ..1....% ..._t_L____=.:....e.,,,:f:.„ .--24: 1/428 -r73 1 ST T1ON r... - -. :30---; LW I LtIU2 .: [35- ''' AIN .Ei,,, ',,',q ST-DA L E i'j.; :.• /436 ,t ,...• - 4+ ' 0 0 j Al 1 - °'-'' io '•: . 1 ,.. to •1/ I t_;4. IA ,,, 1 - 1 . 4 i.p -Is 4:345:11 74:4 70.143-.4-•°.3.74 14 121 ''---/.M- i'. 50 5:::: -441- , w9.0_ i°11-•5 ..1.• g MEADOW - " 74., a so.sa .1, 4--- :-1. ‘,\s, /4.3 .--,-,r77:•:::•:,- ::..--.-------__,'•••••,.•:::.;,....... ' . 4/411reo AcCE.55-49 . . 1 I _____----r::;:i:::•:--- • ----.: :- .'"'-':' ilZ.::•••,..-.. -,7,--,-_, ,-,.....-1:-...; (-C\ -4,,--.7':•;:j-:-: 1 \-4-, • 3%' • 1:Z:11,-- .....• • 1R4 c - • •1 1 •.'.::';777.7::**': ::.::........'..'"" :. INTERSTATE - :...,. 1---- HWY__.-._405-----. "••..-.• ...........'...::.---..'-'".....•:......... .- - -- _" • • •••L .•.. •-•,'........,::;...;••.-.';:UNDER ::: r I CR 4/6OSS/ 6:':.:'.....':.:..'i..: •.::::.L. •.1. )?::*:•.,::7-:7, rall-- -' "•.":".,:r.',777r7- 7,-. .... N---..1••----- .. ...........":.:....:.: .;••• • '• - . ...,..)...:,::.i:',n..7.1777:S?- 47 ;;':''.:.'.....';' •.:•;•••••:.•:•:%9:.?,.:i.r1 f7:77•77777777•77- .............. .vi ter:ccets.s.s.. ----c.• ..,-.--....7..______ o .... ..• -.----- . ,., ts.• zi/407/7.--roi.1 • . . ,r. ., N‘ 71 N • ':' • .35 s.... 125 \ S. ....tia..214•Ladla--1-444-4.4....,..,44.4„..:L1.4.4 ,.., 1 ,Z. ,.T,..i.:),_•;':.%.;',•-•t:....1.. KENNYDALE,. i I .... • .......r......_.,................- ..... \ 751 ___ ,,,,, i 4...-- - CS> --r. . ELEM. -St./00L i ' (3) •••••KSIV • ' . • . / *rT1 \ . 10 co . . • • P R 0 P 0 S 1 • . ,_, g: 7 / •r? , -1. , ., I 442.3 N if If 30 .. ,• ei te a a .. , 30 i r4 . . . cn . '-'-°' c-,,-7 •7 --, 7 /f,'• , , , . ;m A Y _ „... ,... ..... „- Go CO 7.,;'4,4' .. .• 1-. . I ,. .., H- 4), €_ • . . /(,' 1 lc No , • K N . , • / / . . . .0 c' • / / MA Y . . (7) cREkk 0)- • ., • C irm • . siD .A 303.72 4- / -'. i . . . ...p.., . 30 LT:i 4"':, 7, „ 3,00, • • • SO ! *...., .I .. • • .' ... 1 . ' . .. . • , . ).. • . • ' . ... . . 4..i ' • . . • • 1 • . . . . . .. . . • • ' . 4.. ... . I ' • • 4. : ..• •••••••••• • .....111010... • k . '.. t •.. . • I k• . . . • 4 • I •. • I ,•rr.- .. '',1' • • .' . . " . . ' • . •. . ' • • . . • 1 • . ' • • !, •• • . e., ••,. . • ., . • I • . . .„, ;.14.:fi'l,•:.. .....'''..:. • 4.1.:1,•:'-'i`..•,.;:`es..._ • "€-'.•,,,./ • • . -/:/ -.,':` • • ' . . • ... . . . ''''(:.,•:-....',.I - ,. , %- • .. ,.. . . . . •• -,•:-..,..,,,,.?...;:,,,,,,,-, 1, .•;/,":,tc.,4, . . .. . . • • • • . • ' . . • • 1!•• .. • • • 1. . •. • •. . I• . . zer°,,,,i` • • • • .1. q 't,,,6'1 • • . :: . I.. • . . .• • . • '''-:,;%:: , . . • . ' ..•.. . , . .• . •. • ' .• • • .• • . . . . . .. . • .. ' . '•. 'I- M . • , • . • . •:. :''.':. • : . . -9.,,.-.rn• : ;-.t x . . . • • „ -• •alt_ - ; ' . , . .• ..1• -0 • . .0 rill . • . • . . • ' 0 • :' - . . • . • • .. ': . •-n ifl ND• 0 . ... . . • •••• 33 z . • • .. •• ..i. rn--:, - ."-:1 rn . . < .. .- •• 0.g. o-.% 111 . : I. z z . c..0 • . . • • • .. • A ..---.: • .*-4 7,1 •. . . , • 1. ` . . . ' ` • , . • CITY _ F RENTON Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman July 8, 1997 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON JUL 0 81997 Mr. Russ Stromberg The Walter Group RECEIVED 1109 First Avenue, #205 Seattle, WA 98101 Re: Appeal of Environmental Review Committee's Decision/Recommendation re US West Communications-Wireless Proposed Wireless Communication Facility Dear Mr. Stromberg: This office has reviewed your letter of June 23, 1997, and has reviewed the underlying file. While the letter purports to be an appeal of a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (DNS-M), apparently the underlying permit, an Administrative Conditional Use, was denied. A change in this SEPA determination would not change that outcome. There would be no purpose served by reviewing the SEPA determination of the ERC since even conjecturing that a reversal of the ERC's determination or voiding of the conditions imposed would not change the outcome. A favorable outcome in the appeal hearing would not result in any change in the ultimate permit denial. The legal term applied to such a suggested remedy is that it is moot. Again, no purpose is shown for conducting such a hearing. This office will dismiss this matter without prejudice. Should this or a similar permit once again be presented for review and should the SEPA determination remain the same an appeal may then be filed. If this office can be of further assistance, please feel free to write. Sincerely, q;a1) 1(au44,--- Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner FJK:mm cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Jay Covington, Mayor's Executive Assistant Environmental Review Committee Larry Warren, City Attorney 2EA)1J/FtaK NE A}A)/'J 6 200 Mill Avenuee South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2593 a)This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer r v7.— Washington State Northwest Region Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North Sid Morrison P.O. Box 330310 Seattle,WA 98133-9710 Secretary of Transportation (206)440-4000 -)P.VELOPMENT PLANNING • ^ITV np nr:NiT N DATE: June 20, 1997 JUN 2 5 1997 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning R C E* City of Renton, Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South Renton WA 98055 Subject: SR 405 MP 6.34 CS 1744 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance-US West I-405 PCS Site construction of 6 antennas mounted on 80 ft. tall Monopole & 2 cabinets File No.LUA-97-041,ECF,ACU,V FROM: Robert A. Josephson, PE, Manager of Planning& Local Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North, MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 • Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project,which is located at 1416 N 30th Street. Our response is below: We have reviewed the subject document and have no further comments. The project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. If you have any questions,please contact Don Hurter at 440-4664 or Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section VEE:vee File Name • 14 8 5 5 5 CITY OF . ,. ...., •.. US WASHINGTON 19-10/21 . , ..RENTON BRANCH 1250 ••••• PAY ,4250,DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS , DATE 06/20/97 AMOUNT ********250.00 ..• -•A • ••• • "'•• von?AFTER 6 MONTHS TO THE ORDER OF ••••' .'.• •—•-• '• "•!.:••••••(' •: • US WEST COMMUNICATIONS, RUSS STROMBERG 1109 FIRST AVE S .. . SEATTLE, WA .9.8101 •• • • . , • . •:•• ..:....*.:'••••••1.•'•••.•;.„. . . . . •.... .....••••, „•, . . • 1,43 s I. L 2 E000 0.5 Si3 ti• II' ••• •••• . . „ I.VENDOR NO NAME : ..... NO 400430 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS, RUSS STROMB 06/20/97 250.00 0148555 • R9701845 250.00 • • • • CITY OF RENTON• 200 MILL AVE S.• RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 • PHONE(206) 235-2617 • FAX(206) 235-2513 DP3111S 2.,: City of Renton Finance Department Request for Claims or Treasurer's Check L•)O Date of Request (Q//c)•../611 Date Required 1-9-1) Requesting Department p hap Authorized Signature V-1 0-tN- C REASON FOR CHECK Deposit Refund Name 11.5 , WE ,-7- Amount ` S cc i Finance Receipt No k 9 0/ ij 5 Receipt Date -7/61"7 Other X Describe Circumstances Requiring Issuance y��rofCheck: �� L �/ • Awl A /� �i �`F'B 9 A i L / 8"'•/� f ( / f/ i is e47/472,W 4 1,7 t`arne-e67-fi/yeitte CHECK PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS • Amount $ r C). GO Charge to Account(s) 000 S. 1 . co . Payable To {,�`;,=.� 1/1 E-S J� L CAM/1/1 UN! 't ibM> Address C/o ( -Ur-�`J -T12, N E;-R 6 FR " ,-/R L . UP 0 Mail Check to Payee ( ! 0Q F-7( 1'ST AvE: _ S. ' ' -. A 1 T"t. :. 1 ( V . q ie 0 'D-`'Return to Dept: /-rjrN n ` L, L..1 Soc Sec or IRS ID No 0 Other: CHECK AUTHORIZATION - Finance Department Use Only. Approved Date 0 Claims 0 Treasurer's Check No: CTY006/7/89 f • illWashington State Northwest Region Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North Sid Morrison P.O.Box 330310 Seattle,WA 98133-9710 Secretary of Transportation (206)440-4000 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DATE: June 13, 1997 JUN 1 8 1997 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning RECEIVED � City of Renton,Project Manager I D 200 Mill Avenue South Renton WA 98055 Subject: SR 405 MP 6.34 CS 1744 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance-US West I-405 PCS Site construction of 6 antennas mounted on 80 ft. tall Monopole& 2 cabinets File No.LUA-97-041,ECF,ACU,V FROM: Robert A. Josephson, PE, Manager of Planning&Local Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation • Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North, MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project,which'is located at 1416 N 30th Street. Our response is below: We have reviewed the subject document and have • no further comments. The project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. . If you have any questions,please contact Don Hurter at 440-4664 or Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section VEE:vee File Name • Jil • • CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION comiiissimigioncommosomminsopsEgvicaar mAILINeggginginiMMENEMENEMBENEME. .................................................................................... AFFIDAVIT ......... On the day of 1J,Int... , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing • Re?ezy:t 16v.‘Ck Dec.1%(0-V\ documents. This information was sent to: 1Name Representing k4etti4 AoC.s% US t..04.4- CiwWW.4JA le ltrkt 614 lOtre_tesS quas 'Skim tovN\3441 • Q61 Let Ate. Vv\outt • WAVC. INN-VkaAJTC_ Liittkoom Shell C7e.cAtc. sva.e6-Ne.a..inek • Signature of Sender) 951kw4ket_.1( STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Sevvb kal signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary .act for the uses and purposes Mentioned in the instrument. -110 • Dated: yip Notary Publicilnd forti tate of Wahlilgtp ,g4.• Notary (Print) u ;L RET Ja , , 101' My appointment exp'ei,• , _ _ . ,I. *.t•••••.,• • . Project Name: u% pcs s c Project Number: 1-11 — 041. AC..l.) NOTARY.DOC City of Renton Finance Department Request for Claims or Treasurer's Check Date of Request o//J-/9 7 Date Required Requesting Department p/o//P 1 / Authorized Signature )271-t1144_ 0-64v. 'Vi Ge S REASON FOR CHECK Deposit Refund Name V s . WE-S T Amount (a5 D• obi Finance Receipt No R c ')OIt 45 Receipt Date 3 ja-7/''7 Other " Describe Circumstances Requiring Issuance of Check: �PPL41 cA--r- For 11 1owe. 6 a V t c O. fe r(�• i 4v Gcoif oh aviq?5 r 1>�i l ate re- Om aanc �E�L Niefilftiftwo rij CHECK PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS Amount $ a SO• co Charge to Account(s) 000. 34 Gj• .j i1 . 00 , o f 9 Payable To (fG Wes„ j eaMM uN1(ATi2)/6 Address (1/Q RuS5, STR oi"t F -6 ri-1,F 1A/A-L-T Ca 120UP 0 Mail Check to Payee 110 Ft PST AVE- . S. 4 q0 I 0 r Return to Dept: Aj TN ;. Soc Sec or IRS ID No 0 Other: L�5 � CHECK AUTHORIZATION - Finance Department Use Only Approved Date PP t 0 Claims 0 Treasurer's Check No: CTY006/7/89 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 03/27/97 16 : 02 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9701845 Amount : 1, 450 . 00 03/27/97 16 : 01 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #1045725 US WEST Init : JAC Project # : LUA97-041 Type : LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 334210-3240 Site Address : 1416 N 30TH ST Total Fees : 1, 450 . 00 This Payment 1, 450 . 00 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 450 . 00 Balance : . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0006 Conditional Use Fees 1, 000 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 200 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0019 Variance Fees 250 . 00 civ I PLANNING Glv OP RENTON CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: June 10, 1997 TO: Laureen Nicolay FROM: Jennifer Henning NA SUBJECT: US West I-405 Site PCS Site(File No. LUA-97-041,ACU,V,ECF) The newly adopted Telecommunications Ordinance would not permit the above-referenced project in the R-8 Zone. The Environmental and Administrative Conditional Use Permit have been processed, but the project can not proceed to the Board of Adjustment for the Variance, since the ACU was denied and the project is not allowed in the R-8. We need to refund the Variance fee to the applicant or contact person, per my discussions with Jim Hanson. Could you make the necessary arrangements to accomplish this? Let me know if you need any information from me. Thank you. cc: H:\WW6ODOT\MEMO.DOT\bh ` — `' REPORT City of Renton & Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION DECISION DATE: REVISED --June 3, 1997 Project Name: US West 1-405 PCS Site Applicant: US West Communications Owner: Keith and Luella Noess File Number: ' LUA-097-041, ACU; V, ECF ' Project Manager.. Jennifer Toth Henning Project Description: Proposal for a PCS wireless communication facility consisting of six (6) antennas installed on an 80,foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. The proposal includes a Variance requires to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential - 8 DU/Ac (R-8) Zone. Project Location: 1416 North 30th Street • Exist. Bldg. Area SF: N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: N/A Site Area: 550 square feet Total Building Area SF: N/A .I-•'40~39�'38. 37146 31 30! 29 I271,6 257 ' 1:: '� � 157 �17 • o � _ o ® fliO3 j,: N. • 31 ST ST. • o a 197 m'i Ill ;57 15;:3 5: • t•��a-, 5�ay::5':�: 5: 21:2: v ; ' I : t S 1 -1 e '1-F� v. 1 Is t , :, :c ..'•0.2! 12:j .iIij12: ZI' ut---,t ' J^ J — T t— SfRV, ,I aru.t.Joi I� g a 00l :b '-• 3.. i 3:i rJ' 71' ' I ; aC g Ft 1 6 Ir57 Ic .1 '�{ L� IL�II o ;.. I 11 .0 y 1� ,Il1 :� I1„ a a5l ' ! I I Ifni, u :0 n0 ' •••• 1 30TH :� ST. A s • N. 57 "ai: er 25 ..:. 5: 751 0 5C :520 50 - ; • 1 • , 50 W 150 • 50 ; .285 ...5 ' 1 A r,i...—j_I,' 0:1F, 'ER:ML .!e-. 4: j 6 13J 136,,-,3.1 34 1 ,-34 1 35•12 i. i '2. .12b 47 z6 i y 'lip 1. 1 . ' N. 29TH ST. - 14 0 -1 - 41 4 j . - .y I I _ 1^ 1 I 1 c 1 .1Sc I00 _ 151 I_.—L.__ ; qE 5 120.5 '�y'1' ^'.,) c I ' I . I ' Y-- C7LT7 , 50, Ito •se :!- kJ 12 �1p.4 i5 '15I17 'Io.I 1 IL7Z21.•I24{' QJ K'ssi 1 ' [N C !G 1 1 •r• 3 'I _ 'fr 4 n 'S_;_4'F— !' i a I 46 I J�1315 I'. 35 34'P1.3'13; •30•."« 1 2s.27 26 �- ...... t�1=_5 . 'n ..I ,.1^ I „• •` — r la IQ.0 �1 , ©I I 1 m 2 ` �i 75 ♦` 'f151 i o :2 NN11 0 1-�---t I; mL___ I I 1 • , •• I u 125R51.1 50 .25'25 .. _® -_ 1 I 'a' 1:{:� El al N. . 28TH PL. ,. .,2 .j lb: • 1 uCI,---. 1 .. • Project Location Map ERCACU.DOC • City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&1 mmental Review Committee Staff Report USWEST 1-405 PCS Site LUA-97 041,ACU, V,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JUNE 3,1997 Page2 of 11 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant proposes to install a PCS wireless communications facility consisting of six (6) antennas mounted on an 80-foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. At the time that the application was filed with the City, the proposal was considered to be a "medium utility" based on the definition of such facilities (wireless base station) in the City Code. However, on June 2, 1997, the City Council adopted a Telecommunications Ordinance that classifies the facility as a Monopole II structure. This is the definition given to facilities that are greater than 60 feet in height. Monopole II structures are prohibited from locating in the R-8 Zone. As proposed, the facility could not be permitted in the R-8 Zone. The application also includes a Variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential - 8 DU/AC (R-8) Zone by 50 feet. Since the Telecommunications Ordinance prohibits monopoles of this height in the R-8 Zone, the Variance request will not go forward. The proposed monopole would be made of galvanized steel. Six antennas are proposed for mounting on the pole, these would be approximately 42 inches long, five inches wide, and four inches deep. The applicant is considering the addition of up to three antennas which could be installed on the monopole at a later date, if it was determined to be necessary to meet service demand. Equipment cabinets would be installed on a 9-1/2 foot by 12 foot concrete pad. An additional cabinet may be placed on the pad at a later date to accommodate growth of the system. The cabinets would be placed slightly into a berm. The cabinets would be partially hidden from view by the berm. In addition, a slatted chainlink fence would screen the cabinets. Accessory devices installed at the facility include a geostationary positioning system antenna (a few inches in length), a lightning rod, and parking bollards. The proposed facility would be unattended. USWest expects maintenance visits to the site to be no more than once each month, or as little as once per quarter. Since maintenance visits would be infrequent, the applicant is not proposing to provide additional parking. An existing two-story apartment building is located approximately 60 feet west of the monopole site. A Texaco fuel/service station is located southwest of the subject parcel. Interstate 405 is located to the east and single family residential housing is located to the north. Clusters of evergreen trees border the site on the north and south. Additional trees on the west half of the property obscure views of the structures from properties to the southwest. The applicant intends to begin construction upon the completion of the land use and environmental review process. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental ERCACU.DOC • City of RentonPB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&I mmental Review Committee Staff Report USWEST 1-405 PCS Site LUA-97 041,ACU, T,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 3,1997 Page3 of 11 impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1. Surface Water Impacts: The project site would be a leased area of approximately 550 square feet in size. The proposal would add a concrete slab of approximately 108 square feet in size to the site. The applicant contends that any storm water runoff from this impervious area will be able to infiltrate into the ground. City Code does not require detention or stormwater quality facilities for this amount of new impervious surface. Mitigation Measures: None required. Nexus: N/A 2. Earth Impacts: The project would have a minor amount of grading which would occur for the construction of a retaining wall around the north, east, and south boundaries of the equipment compound. The applicant will need to install and maintain temporary erosion control measures to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division inspector. Mitigation Measures: None required. Nexus: N/A 3. Air Impacts: Adverse impacts to air quality during the construction phase of the project would be limited to fugitive dust during the time that grading would expose the surface soils, and to exhaust emitted from construction vehicles. Fugitive dust can be controlled by sprinkling the site as required during the construction phase of the project. Air quality impacts from the construction vehicles would be temporary in nature and is already regulated by state and federal standards. Mitigation Measures: None required. Nexus: N/A 4. Aesthetics Impacts: The proposal would result in the installation of an 80-foot tall monopole in an area zoned R-8 and designated as residential single family in the Comprehensive Plan. The R-8 Zone limits the height of structures to two stories or 30 feet. Policies in the Utilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan require that siting and location of telecommunications facilities be accomplished in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on the environment and adjacent land uses (Policy U-100). The policies also require that cellular communications structures and towers be sensitively sited and designed to diminish aesthetic impacts, and be collocated on existing structures and towers wherever possible and practical (Policy U-101). The applicant has stated that this location was selected after several alternative locations meeting their siting requirements were considered, including the adjacent Texaco site on the north side of North 30th, the Chevron site on the south side of North 30th, the Arco site and Kennydale Elementary School on North 30th east of 1-405. Negotiations with owners of the other commercially zoned properties were ERCACU.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&1 ?mental Review Committee Staff Report USWEST 1-405 PCS Site LUA-97 041,ACU, V,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 3,1997 Page4 of 11 unsuccessful. The applicant has decided to pursue the subject site for their proposal since it meets engineering and other locational criteria. Presently, a multi-family residential apartment building occupies a portion of the site. The remainder of the subject parcel is vacant and is located adjacent to Interstate 405. The applicant is proposing to screen the equipment compound with a wire mesh fence (chain-link) that has wood slates, and to plant shrubs along the north and south perimeters of the fence. Existing site vegetation would partially screen views of the equipment cabinets and monopole, however, the monopole would be out of character with the surrounding single family area, increasing the visual complexity through the introduction of a new vertical element 80 feet in height. Pole signs for the Texaco and Chevron gas stations currently exist in the commercial area located to the south. Also, an existing GTE telecommunications monopole, approximately 25 feet higher than the proposal, is located on the opposite side of Interstate 405 at North 30th Street, and also in a small area designated for commercial uses. These existing signs and telecommunications monopole are within areas zoned Convenience Commercial -- area that are intended for commercial development, not areas zoned for single family residential homes, as is the subject site. According to requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the applicant will be required to provide appropriate lighting at the top of the monopole per the FAA Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration. The addition of obstruction lighting would increase the visibility of the structure as viewed from the residential areas. Mitigation Measures In order to diminish the aesthetic impact of the proposed telecommunications facility on the adjacent residential neighborhood, and to meet the intent of Comprehensive Plan Policies U-100 and U-101, the applicant shall be required to: 1.a) Meet the 30-foot height limit of the Residential - 8 DU/AC (R-8) Zone. AND 1.b) The applicant shall provide documentation demonstrating that a good faith effort has been made to negotiate with other commercially zoned properties in order to locate or collocate the proposed monopole facility in the vicinity of North 30th Street and 1-405. AND 2. The applicant shall demonstrate compliance with the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) requirements for marking and lighting by providing written verification to the Development Services Division of the specific FAA requirements and methods of achieving same. The applicant/operator of the facility shall also be required to maintain any FAA required marking and/or lighting for the life of the facility. Nexus: Environmental Ordinance, Code Section 4-6. . B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: IDETERMINATION OF X ! DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. ERCACU.DOC City of RentonPB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&1 9nmental Review Committee Staff Report USWEST 1-405 PCS Site LUA-97 041,ACU, V,ECF ' REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 3,1997 Pages of 11 X Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment and A eal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment and Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Appeal Period. Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. Mitigation Measures 1. In order to diminish the aesthetic impact of the proposed telecommunications facility on the adjacent residential neighborhood, and to meet the intent of Comprehensive Plan Policies U-100 and U-101, the applicant shall be required to: a) Meet the 30 foot height limit of the Residential -8 DU/AC (R-8) Zone. AND b) The applicant shall provide documentation demonstrating that a good faith effort has been made to negotiate with other commercially zoned properties in order to locate or collocate the proposed monopole facility in the vicinity of North 30th Street and 1-405. AND 2. The applicant shall demonstrate compliance with the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) requirements for marking and lighting by providing written verification to the Development Services Division of the specific FAA requirements and methods of achieving same. The applicant/operator of the facility shall also be required to maintain any FAA required marking and/or lighting for the life of the facility. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Airport Manager. 1. The monopole would be 80 feet in height. With the attached antennas, the overall height would be 83 feet above a ground level of 227 feet above sea level. A Notice of Proposed Construction should be filed with and approved by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) (Part 77 regulations) prior to the granting of a height variance or building permit. 2. The existing Texaco sign (located adjacent to this site) and the GTE monopole on the east side of I- 405 at North 30th Street are taller than the proposed monopole. The City should consider whether it will require this monopole to be removed if the other structures are removed. 3. If lighting is required by the FAA, the applicant should be responsible for the inspection and maintenance of said lighting. If painting is required, the applicant should be required to maintain the painted surface. 4. NOTE: Applicant has submitted FAA Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration dated October 21, 1996 which requires that the monopole be obstruction lighted per FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1, Chapters 4,5, and 13. ERCACU.DOC ' City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&1 'mental Review Committee Staff Report USWEST 1-405 PCS Site LUA-97 041,ACU, i,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE3,1997 Page6of11 PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT & DECISION This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit x Conditional Use--Administrative Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative Code Determination 1B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. A-1, Site Plan/Details (Received March 31, 1997). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. T-1, Legal Description; NotesNicinity Map (Received March 27, 1997). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. C-S, Topographic Survey (Received March 27, 1997). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. A-2, Details (Received March 27, 1997). Exhibit No. 6: Drawing No. A-3, Details/Notes (Received March 27, 1997) Exhibit No. 7: Photosimulations (five from various vantages) (Received May 23, 1997) C. CONSISTENCY WITH CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA Section 4-31-36 lists 11 criteria that the decisionmaker is asked to consider, along with all other relevant information, in making a decision on a Conditional Use application. These include the following: (1) CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMP. PLAN, ZONING CODE& OTHER ORDINANCES: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standard of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. The proposed 80-foot high monopole is not consistent with the purpose of the R-8 Zone which states that the zone: "is intended to prohibit the development of uses that are incompatible with the residential environment." The R-8 Zone permits heights of up to two stories or 30 feet in height. An 80-foot high monopole is not consistent with the height limits specified in the R-8 development standards, nor is it compatible with the character of single family residential homes. Comprehensive Plan Policy U-100 requires that "the siting and location of telecommunications facilities be accomplished in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on the environment and adjacent land uses." Policy U-101 requires that "cellular communication structures and towers be sensitively sited and designed to diminish aesthetic impacts, and be collocated on existing structures and towers wherever possible and practical." The proposed facility is proposed for a residential area which does not meet the intent of Policy U-100, but the location of the structure would be on the edge of the residential area, and abutting an interstate freeway. Collocation of the facility on an existing telecommunications tower or sign pole in a commercially designated area would be preferable, and the applicant has stated that inquires were made to relocate or collocate ERCACU.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&] onmental Review Committee Staff j Report USWEST 1-405 PCS Site LUA-97 041,ACU, V,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE3,1997 Page7 of11 the facility with unsuccessful results. The applicant has not, however, submitted documentation substantiating those negotiations. In addition, an Emergency Telecommunications Ordinance was adopted by the City Council on June 2, 1997. This Ordinance prohibits telecommunications facilities of this type and height in a residential zone, or within 300 feet of a residential zone. Monopoles of up to 60 feet in height are allowed in a residential zone only with an Administrative Conditional Use Permit, when the site is over one acre in size, and the facility has a minimum setback of 100 feet from any adjacent residentially zoned parcel. As proposed, the facility is classified as a Monopole II structure and is prohibited in the R-8 Zone, where the applicant has proposed the installation. (2) COMMUNITY NEED: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination of community need, the following factors shall be considered, among all other relevant information: (a) The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The intersection of North 30th and 1-405 has been investigated by various telecommunications purveyors due to its proximity to 1-405, existing commercial zoning, and engineering considerations. There is presently one purveyor, GTE that has an existing wireless base station (monopole and equipment compound) located on the northeast intersection of North 30th and 1-405. Given the licensing of telecommunications purveyors by the Federal Communications Commission, it is conceivable that multiple purveyors will attempt to locate in the vicinity of the site. In order to reduce the possibility of overconcentration of this type of facility, a good faith effort should be made to collocate either on existing facilities, or existing structures such as pole signs, in the vicinity. (2) That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. Properties designated and zoned for residential uses are not considered to be appropriate for the location of telecommunication monopoles. A more appropriate area would be a commercially zoned property, located at least 100 to 300 feet from the nearest designated residential property. (6C) EFFECT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. The following site requirements shall be required: Height: Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Spires, belltowers, public utility antennas or similar structure may exceed the height requirement upon approval of a variance. Building heights should be related to surrounding uses in order to allow optimal sunlight and ventilation, and minimal obstruction of views from adjacent structures. Structure heights within the R-8 Zone are limited to 30 feet. The proposed monopole exceeds that height limit by 50 feet. The newly adopted Telecommunications Ordinance prohibits telecommunications facilities of this type and size from locating in the R-8 Zone. Views from adjacent residential areas would be affected, however, given the current development pattern, and photo-simulations of the proposed development provided by the applicant, it does not appear that the current views would be substantially affected. ERCACU.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&1 onmental Review Committee Staff Report USWEST 1-405 PCS Site LUA-97 041,ACU, V,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 3,1997 Page8 of 11 (6D) COMPATIBILITY: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. (Ord 3599, 1-11-82) The proposal is not compatible with the residential scale and character of the R-8 Zone and surrounding residential neighborhood. Heights are limited to two stories or 30 feet, and the proposal clearly exceeds that limitation. A location adjacent to Interstate 405 and within the abutting commercial area would be more appropriate, if the restrictions for siting as indicated in the adopted Telecommunications Ordinance are met. (6E) PARKING: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased to as much as seventy-five percent (75%) of the lot coverage requirement of the zone, in which the proposed use is located, if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. (Ord.3903, 4-22-85) Not applicable. (6F) TRAFFIC: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in the surrounding area. Not applicable. (6G) NOISE, GLARE: Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. The FAA requirement for lighting of the proposed monopole would make it more visible to the surrounding area, but would not be expected to result in substantial light or glare impacts, unless a strobe light is installed. (6H) LANDSCAPING: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by building or paving. The decision makers may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. The applicant is relying on existing landscaping, a new slatted chain-link fence, and new evergreen shrubs to be installed primarily on the north and south perimeters of the equipment compound to screen views of the facility. If the conditional use permit were to be approved, staff would recommend as a condition of approval that revisions be made to the landscape plan which incorporate a dense screen of ornamental plantings around the base of the equipment compound. (61) ACCESSORY USES: Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are located. Not applicable. ERCACU.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&I onmental Review Committee Staff Report USWEST 1-405 PCS Site LUA-97 041,ACU, T,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JUNE 3,1997 Page9 of 11 (6J) CONVERSION: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the provisions of this Chapter. Not applicable. (6K) PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities, and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditional upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities, utilities, and/or services. Not applicable. XX Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. C. Findings, Conclusions & Decision Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The Applicant has requested Environmental Review and approval of an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for development of the US West 1-405 PCS Site. The proposal includes the installation of an 80-foot high monopole with six panel antennas and two equipment cabinets. The applicant is also requesting that up to three additional panel antennas and one additional equipment cabinet be permitted to be installed at a later undetermined date, if system demand warrants. A Variance from the height restrictions of the R-8 Zone has also been applied for, but that request will not be considered as a result of City's new Telecommunications Ordinance which prohibits Monopole II structures in the R-8 Zone. . 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents is entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) Conditional Use Permit(Administrative) The applicant's application complies with the requirements for information for administrative conditional use permit review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 through 7. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is generally not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Residential Single Family, as the proposal is incompatible with residential neighborhoods. However, the facility would be located adjacent to a major interstate freeway and adjacent to a commercial' neighborhood. In addition, if the requested variance allowing an exceedance of the height is granted, and if the applicant is required to allow other purveyors to collocate on the monopole, then greater consistency with the Comprehensive Plan policies would be achieved. 5) Zoning: The Conditional Use as presented, does not comply with the zoning requirements and development standards of the R-8 Zoning designation. Nor does the proposed ERCACU.DOC ' City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&. ,onmental Review Committee Staff Report USWEST 1-405 PCS Site LUA-97 041,ACU, Y,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JUNE 3,1997 Pagel of 11 facility comply with the adopted Telecommunications Ordinance, which prohibits Monopole II structures within the R-8 Zone. 6) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: vacant, undeveloped, zoned for single family residential; East: Interstate 405; South: Texaco station and Convenience Commercial uses, and West existing apartment building located in a single family residential zone. D. Conclusions 1) The subject'proposal does not presently comply with the policies, codes and ordinances of the City of Renton. 2) The proposal does not presently comply with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Residential Single Family; and the Zoning designation of Residential 8 DU/AC (R-8). E. Decision The Administrative Conditional Use Permit for US West 1-405 PCS, File No. LUA-97-041, ACU, V, ECF, is denied based on non-conformance with the adopted plans, codes and ordinances of the City of Renton. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: June 5, 1997 SIGNATURES: ,_, 4___ t -‘-77 es C.Hanson,Zoning Administrator date teeeeSj4nd Ad MR. 7 Michael D.Kattermann,Zoning Administrator date TRANSMITTED this 5th day of June, 1997 to the applicant and owner: ,Keith and Luella Noess 21210 4th Place South Seattle, WA 98198 I US West Communications Wireless 1249 NE 145th, #105 Seattle, WA 98155 Russ Stromberg The Wafter Group 1109 First Ave South Seattle WA 98101 ERCACU.DOC City ofRenton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval& onmental Review Committee Staff Report , 'USWEST 1-405 PCS Site LUA-97 041,ACU, V,ECF • REPORT AND DECISION OF JUNE 3,1997 Pagel of1 1 8 TRANSMITTED this 5th day of June, 1997 to the parties of record: Gay Lee 12045 SE 76th Street Newcastle, WA 98056 Marlene Mandt 1408 North 26th Street Renton, WA 98056 Connie Brundage 1440 North 28th Street Renton, WA 98056 William Snell 701 5th Avenue, Suite 7100 Seattle, WA 98104 George Sidebotham 1404 North 30th Street Renton, WA 98056 TRANSMITTED this 5th day of June, 1997 to the following: Larry Meckling,Building Official Bob Arthur,Land Use Inspector Art Larson,Fire Marshal Neil Watts,Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney South County Journal ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL (COMBINED COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIOD) ;• Environmental Determination Comment Process Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 23rd, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor City of Renton Development Services Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 • Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM,June 23rd, 1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. ERCACU.DOC R ti DEVELOPMENT PLANNiNr 4 June 1997 C!TY OF RFntTnAr Environmental Review Committee JU 2 5 7997 City of Renton ' a 200 Mill Avenue South • -- Renton,WA 98055 Attention: Environmental Review Committee SUBJECT: US West I-405 PCS Site (Exit 6 Southboupd off-ramp) . Project No.LUA-97-041,CU,V,ECF We the attached citizens of Kennydale wish the Environmental Review Committee review our concerns very carefully. Your decision will impact us and other 8 DU/AC (R 8) residential zones in Renton for the rest of our lives. The applicant proposes to obtain a variance to install a PCS wireless communications facility consisting of six (6) antennas mounted on an 80-foot tall support monopole with two equipment cabinets in a residential area. The proposal includes a Variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC(R-8)zone. Our major concerns are as follows: Aesthetic Impact The 80 foot monopole with 6 attached antenna(42 inches long,5 inches wide and 4 inches deep). Plans call out for 3 additional antennas installed at a later date. This PCS wireless communication facility will take away the view. We shouldn't have to devalue our property for a commercial venture. Renton Airport Fly Over We are very concerned with the proposed facility effect on take-offs and landing from Renton Airport. We have a current problem of planes flying overhead by 45 to 70 feet, causing a flurry of calls to Gayle Reed,Manager of the Renton Airport. This problem might have been caused by the Texaco Gas station sign. Value of Life Currently, very few studies are documented on long term health effects' from Electromagnetic Radiation. The technology has not been around long enough for the scientific community to come to agreement on EMR. We do NOT want this tower in our dense R-8 Residentially zoned area. Please add our names as parties of record for this project. We wish to hear from you in the near future as to the outcome of your review. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, HOME.OWNE '! ,poi/yL,U,�, tJ� /�3c5 /1/ a f GO:(- • i3 eS i',/ 29(/ ,Q,,,„ .-0,/ Wl (4031, r J CITY DEVELOPOF RFNTANNING 4 une 1997 NI JUN 1 1 1997 Environmental Review Committee City of Renton RECEIVED 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Attention: Environmental Review Committee SUBJECT: US West I-405 PCS Site (Exit 6 Southbound off-ranip) Project No.LUA-97-041,CU,V,ECF We the attached citizens of Kennydale wish the Environmental Review Committee review our concerns very carefully. Your decision will impact us and other 8 DU/AC (R 8) residential zones in Renton for the rest of our lives. The applicant proposes to obtain a variance to install a PCS wireless communications facility consisting of six (6) antennas mounted on an 80-foot tall support monopole with two equipment cabinets in a residential area. The proposal includes a Variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC(R-8)zone. Our major concerns are as follows: Aesthetic Impact The 80 foot monopole with 6 attached antenna(42 inches long,5 inches wide and 4 inches deep). Plans call out for 3 additional antennas installed at a later date. This PCS wireless communication facility will take away the view. We shouldn't have to devalue our property for a commercial venture. Renton Airport Fly Over We are very concerned with the proposed facility effect on take-offs and landing from Renton Airport. We have a current problem of planes flying overhead by 45 to 70 feet,causing a flurry of calls to Gayle Reed,Manager of the Renton Airport. This problem might have been caused by the Texaco Gas station sign. Value of Life Currently, very few studies are documented on long term health effects from Electromagnetic Radiation. The technology has not been around long enough for the scientific community to come to agreement on EMR. We do NOT want this tower in our dense R-8,Residentially zoned area. Please add our.names as parties of record for this project. We wish to hear from you in the near future as to the outcome of your review. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, HOMEOWNERS: �jU/hoithe /L /2�' & , 4,/ /Zezte_._/ 4 �,,.,4-)k c s i- r ,ve ---cc . „ft,. cv, O Pt , AZ- d /s/-e-- ) AA . 9F-6sl, T. /314 7 26 Sr. _ d, 42 , AA. - geosz ti.r 6 ve K. I. !!lam fril-- (a/, l N •2614 ST 2, ' A) A� 47 in-(on , G • qo s2 2 ,trGati G,A yg.I j-L-t,-1 /4-1 ( /V a‘,a, S,e. . ead.6(,o .�, ,ems w6L4., -% -4 u, kj� vas-6 40 .4.__ ),eir._ Rk i l A/ a 1,, tk S,,1- / % /Q?• /6" Zc pe.,, r,) u6,n g Kos-4 ?e,th r G(JiI 9 4 r( 7� E. a so7 2 .72. /' /( -2,;' r; - � a,,. 9 go 6( 1z 2..� ., c.�,e-7(oj DEVELOPMENT PLANNINn CITY OF R.cto-n,,; 4 June 1997 JUN 1 3 1997 Environmental Review Committee RECe City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Attention: Environmental Review Committee SUBJECT: US West I-405 PCS Site(Exit 6 Southbound off-tamp) Project No.LUA-97-041,CU,V,ECF We the attached citizens of Kennydale wish the Environmental Review Committee review our concerns very carefully. Your decision will impact us and other 8 DU/AC (R-8) residential zones in Renton for the rest of our lives. The applicant proposes to obtain a variance to install a PCS wireless communications facility consisting of six (6) antennas mounted on an 80-foot tall support monopole with two equipment cabinets in a residential area. The proposal includes a Variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC(R-8)zone. Our major concerns are as follows: Aesthetic Impact o The 80 foot monopole with 6 attached antenna (42 inches long,5 inches wide and 4 inches deep). Plans call out for 3 additional antennas installed at a later date. This PCS wireless communication facility will take away the view. We shouldn't have to devalue our property for a commercial venture. Renton Airport Fly Over We are very concerned with the proposed facility effect on take-offs and landing from Renton Airport. We have a current problem of planes flying overhead by 45 to 70 feet,causing a flurry of calls to Gayle Reed,Manager of the Renton Airport. This problem might have been caused by the Texaco Gas station sign. Value of Life Currently, very few studies are documented on long term health effects from Electromagnetic Radiation. The technology has not been around long enough for the scientific community to come to agreement on EMR. • We do NOT want this tower in our dense R-8 Residentially zoned area. ' 4 d Please add our names as parties of record for this project. We wish to hear from you in the near future as to the outcome of your review. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, H}OnnM''E,,OW--N 17D3 t36A6 Refrlo-n) lam- lgo` 1-705 t\Ve 641 DEVELOPMENT PLANNINC ..ITV rl. 0,ef\j-ro ! JUN 1 3 1997 RECEIVED y- : • CIT's OF RENTON .E. .� Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 05, 1997 Washington State • Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the revised Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on June 03, 1997: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED US WEST 1-405 PCS SITE L U A-97-041,E C F,AC U,V Applicant proposes to install a PCS wireless communications facility consisting of six(6) antennas mounted on an 80-foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. The proposal includes a Variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential- 8 DU/AC (R-8)Zone. Location: 1416 N. 30th St. Comment Process. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 23, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments.After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeal Process. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 23, 1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. If you have questions, please call me at(425)277-6186. For the Environmental Re view Committee, • .4-64, f- Toth ' -nning Akte1ext 6.6 .91 eject a ager cc: King County Water Pollution Control Division, Metro S. Department of Wildlife Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Sue Rumery;City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Rita Perstac, Puget Power 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 a)This paper contains 50%recycled material.20%cost consumer S_, • : CIT`. OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E. Administrator • June 5, 1997 . Mr. Russ Stromberg The Walter Group 1109 First Avenue South Seattle, WA 98101 • SUBJECT: US West 1-405 PCS Site Project No. LUA-97-041,ECF,ACU,V • Dear Mr. Stromberg: This letter is written on behalf of the'Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced.project. The Committee, on June 03, 1997, issued a revised threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with conditions. The revision was necessary to correct an error in the previous mitigation measures: ':See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Comment Process. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00. PM June 23, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review.Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeal Process. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 23, 1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. WAC 197-11-660 states that the responsibility for mitigation measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of the imposed action. Since an environmental impact statement has not been prepared for this project, any mitigation measure established by,the ERC not directly attributable to an identified adverse impact is deemed to be voluntarily accepted by the applicant. • Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g., the Public Works Division) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended for this project, if you have specific questions. This information will assist you,in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully,if you choose to do so. DNSMLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South_ Renton, Washington 98055 I, • Mr. Russ Stromberg The Walter Group Project LUA-97-041,ECF,ACU,V May 29, 1997 Page-2- I! I ' I • The Board of Adjustment public hearing originally scheduled for June 25, 1997, 7:30 PM, is canceled due'to changes in newly adopted City regulations. The project as proposed is prohibited from locating in the R-8 zone. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425) 277-6186. For the Environmental Review Committee, otin • • Jennifer Toth Henning Project Manager cc: Mr. &Mrs. Keith Noess/Owners ': M • US West Communications-Wireless/Applicant Parties of Record: Ms. Gay Lee; Ms. Marlene;Mandt; Ms.:Connie'Brundage, Mr.William Snell; Mr. George Sidebotham ` Enclosure dnsmftr CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-041,ECF,SP APPLICANT: US West Communications PROJECT NAME: US West 1-405 PCS Site DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to install a PCS wireless communications facility consisting of six(6) antennas mounted on an 80-foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6.^The proposal includes a Variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential 8 DU/AC (R-8)Zone:, MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. In order to diminish the aesthetic impact of the proposed telecommunications facility on the adjacent residential neighborhood, and to meet the intent of Comprehensive Plan Policies U-100 and U-101,Jthe applicant shall be required to: a) Meet the 30foot height limit of the Residential -8 DU/AC (R-8) Zone. AND b) The applicant shall provide documentation demonstrating that a good faith effort has been made to negotiate with other commercially zoned properties in order to locate or collocate the proposed monopole facility in the vicinity of North 30th Street and 1-405. AND • 2. The applicant shall demonstrate compliance with the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) requirements for marking and lighting by providing written verification. to the Development Services Division of the specific FAA requirements and methods of achieving same. The applicant/operator of the facility shall also be required to maintain any FAA required marking and/or lighting for the life of the facility. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES 9 I � APPLICATION,NO(S): LUA-97-04'1,ECF,SP APPLICANT: US West Communications PROJECT NAME: US West 1=405 PCS Site DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to install a PCS wireless communications facility consisting of six(6) antennas mounted on an 80-foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. Thel proposal includes a Variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential 8 DU/AC (R-8)Zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1416 North 30th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination:: Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to-the appeal processfor environmental determinations. Airport Manager. i 1. The monopole would be 80 feet in height. With the attached antennas, the overall height would be 83 feet above aground level of 227 feet above sea level, A Notice of Proposed Construction should be filed with and approved by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) (Part 77 regulations) prior to the granting of a height variance or building permit. 2. The existing Texaco sign (located adjacent to this site) and the GTE monopole on the east side of 1-405 at North 30th Street are taller than the proposed monopole. The City should consider whether it will require this monopole to be removed if the other structures are removed. 3. If lighting is required by the FAA, the applicant should be responsible for the inspection and maintenance of said lighting. If painting is required, the applicant should be required to maintain the painted surface. 4. NOTE: Applicant has submitted FAA Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration dated October 21,; 1996 which requires that the.monopole be obstruction lighted per FAA Advisory Circular 70R460-1, Chapters 4,5, and 13. I• it • 4 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) REVISED 6/3/97 APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-041,ECF,ACU,V APPLICANT: US West Communications PROJECT NAME: US West 1-405 PCS Site DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to install a PCS wireless communications facility consisting of six (6) antennas mounted on an 80-foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. The proposal includes a Variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC (R-8)Zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1416 North 30th Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on 'the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. PUBLICATION DATE: June 09, 1997 DATE OF DECISION: June 03, 1997 SIGNATURES: 6/3177 Greg‘if erro ,dai stYator DATE Departmly t of-fanning/Building/Public Works L -)2P (c; — Sam Chastain,Administrator DATE Community Serv' e Department Lee ler, Fire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC • Determination of Non-Sianificar:__=.Mitigated US West 1-405 PCS Site Project No. LUA-97-041,ECF,CU,V Page-2- Environmental Determination Comment Process. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 23, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 23, 1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235- 2501. DNSMSIG.DOC • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): :LUA-97-041,ECF,SP APPLICANT: US West Communications PROJECT NAME: US West 1-405 PCS Site DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to install a PCS wireless communications facility consisting of six(6) antennas mounted on an 80-foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6..:The'proposal includes a Variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC (R-8)Zone. MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. In order to diminish the aesthetic impact of the proposed telecommunications facility on the adjacent residential neighborhood, and to meet the intent of Comprehensive Plan Policies U-100 and U-101, the.applicant shall be required to: • a) Meet the 30 foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC (R-8) Zone. AND b) The applicant shall provide documentationrdemonstrating that a good faith effort has been made to negotiate with other commercially zoned properties in order to locate or collocate the proposed monopole facility in the vicinity of North 30th Street and 1-405. AND 2. The applicant shall demonstrate compliance with the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) requirements for marking and lighting by providing written verification to the Development .Services Division of the specific FAA requirements and methods of achieving same. The applicant/operator of the facility shall also be required to maintain any FAA required marking and/or lighting for the life of the facility. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-041,ECF,SP APPLICANT: US West Communications PROJECT NAME: US West 1-405 PCS Site DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to install a PCS wireless communications facility consisting of six(6) antennas mounted on an 80-foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. The proposal includes a Variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential-.8 DU/AC (R-8)Zone. . LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1416 North 30th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Airport Manager. 1. The monopole would be 80 feet in height. With the attached antennas, the overall height would be 83 feet above a ground level of 227 feet above sea level. A Notice of Proposed Construction should be filed with and approved by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) (Part 77 regulations) prior to the granting of a height variance or building permit. 2. The existing Texaco sign (located adjacent to this site) and the GTE monopole on the east side of 1-405 at North 30th_Street are taller than the proposed monopole. The City should consider whether it will require this monopole to be removed if the other structures are removed. 3. If lighting is required by the FAA, the applicant should be responsible for the inspection and maintenance of said lighting. If painting is required, the applicant should be required to maintain the painted surface. 4. NOTE: Applicant has submitted FAA Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration dated October 21, 1996 which requires that the monopole be obstruction lighted per FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1, Chapters 4,5, and 13. N!dT1QE • ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND CANCELLATION OF PUBLIC HEARING ' POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: US WEST 1.405 PCS SITE PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-041,ECFACU,V The appilc.snt proposes to Install a PCS wireless communications facility consisting of six(8)antennas mounted on an 80-foot tall support monopole,and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the . . pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405.Exit 8. The . proposal Includes a Variance request to exceed the 30-loot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC(R- ' 8)Zone.Location:1418 North 301h Street. • THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. n YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON JUNE 23.1997 OR APPEAL. THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM,JUNE 23.1997. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. • THE PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED BY THE RENTON BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR JUNE 25,1997 IS CANCELLED DUE TO CHANGES IN NEWLY ADOPTED CITY REGULATIONS. THE PROJECT,AS PROPOSED,IS PROHIBITED FROM LOCATING IN THE R-8 ZONE. • ••,t5 • N. 31'T S.I. .. r_ d 38 li Alf O.0 Q''.�.:a.a r.l:,lllla Z--.a�__K . f • 6• Q.k Pi L!' 1. .te-I ile i .ll eh! y t'.. i • • • N. 30TH ST. ' r a c C� i i'o V. t --t- --ket ter-='-1i.t-- ei a o5.�• 'ti I N. 2'TH 5T. i i _ ;d0 .4 42 1 N. 2:TH PL. [ �a _ .LS 'd A: , b.kl:.. 1... • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION • IPlease Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification. • I ' CERTIFICATIO—N . • i, Say0.14 citasc1'1 . hereby certify that a copies of the above document were postecilby me in . .conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . Signed: Sat td-s 9j1ti'L/JYYI . , STATE OF WASHINGTON ) . , ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that L signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and volun#,rr .t for.the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument: ,? �• �.\Ono, ' , ., J , Dated: till J q7 ri,t _. _ �.o"'.Nota Publd for h Strate:!of: s ingtbn Notary (PrinpR ARET J. PULLAR My appointment ex alo�,sainlr►i EYo ES Ri9l°�t NO TAR Y,OOC ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND_CANCELLATION OF PUBLIC HEARING POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: US WEST 1-405 PCS SITE PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-041,ECF,ACU,V The applicant proposes to install a PCS wireless communications facility consisting of six(6) antennas mounted on.an 80-foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. The proposal includes a Variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC(R- 8)Zone. Location: 1416 North 30th Street. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. XXX YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON JUNE 23, 1997 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM, JUNE 23. 1997. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. THE'PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED BY THE RENTON BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR JUNE 25, 1997 IS CANCELLED DUE TO CHANGES IN NEWLY ADOPTED CITY REGULATIONS. THE PROJECT,AS PROPOSED, IS PROHIBITED FROM LOCATING IN THE R-8 ZONE. 15 • .11•"d039 VI ..33.0 31 30!2. 127M�6 , I 1 1' N. 31 T ST. =1 38 1: I }: 'P>,. 1< i1'¢1 1a' . I t :tp, I I I'lft�s-t'l1l Z, 10 ;III y, I _ ::e =0.2t iJl 2; r j- 't 3: J' ' � :C ?� 6 J7/ I' 00� 'b i .Jt •1 r• _1 1j yd N. 30TH ST. s - • fo wu - .1 I �?�I 7 ss ' 1n.r, , ' l It l�L?�Ji tc l.!. :!Z Q o„• y 1 IC'rr-L.��3J 35,D ]4 �'J4 3i at'.•-t • i !z EI17n 2i - �• •.. }� N. 29TH 5T. ^ ' . ,40 41 1 4: M1 J' - o ^1 v I ism_I__.i_ ee 1 t:es 1 liu 121�i s i}�1s1171t t2I-.1241 a1 I eG 1 39 i I:: rin i]} 34'rrriz t 1 3u~,� 26°2712, a °... 1d1: to �P ,r 1 M I- 1 I 'F— 1 1. I ©It}I }° 21'71 ve ®'. 'm_:1__t_-- ,�l.•11: � N. 28TH PL. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. 'DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION :<:<::<:;:::<:; . . BER:when:callin ::for:: ro er:::fiile dentification >'>':>;:;<t Please.;,include:ahe:project,NUM,;::.:.., ..:..: ,:..,:. :.,9;.::.....p;<..,:p...:.>.;<..::::::::.:.::..:::.::.::..::.::::.. ... ....:..: .:..... .. .I AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Kristina Thompson, being first duly swom on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of _ _ the NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION}AND CANCELLATION OF PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON 600 S. Washington Avenue,Kent, Washington 98032 The Environmental Review Committee (ERC)has issued a Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated for the iollowing a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal project under the authority of the Renton newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months • Municipal Code. . prior • to the date ofpublication, referred to, printed andpublished in the English language US WEST I-405.PCS SITE 9LUA-97-041,ECF,ACU,V continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County Applicant proposes to install a PCS wire: Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the less communications facility. The facility south- State of Washington for KingCounty. would off-rampbe eo adjacent to 405,the Eit . 9 y bound of Interstate Exit 6. The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the South County The proposal includes a Variance request, Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential - 8 DU/AC (R-8) _Zone. during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Location: 1416 N.30th St. The 15 day comment and appeal period Notice of Environmental Determination-US West 1-405 PCS Site- LUA-97-041- for this project will run concurrently. The co mment/appeal V end at5 00 PMi on June June 23, 1s for 1997. Written comments shall be forwarded to the aspublished on: 6/9/97 Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the pro- ject file and the mitigation measures The full amount of the fee charged fo said foregoing publication is the sum of$56.15 imposed by the City of Renton's LeLegal Number 3150 Environmental Review Committee are 9 available at the Development Services I Division, Third floor, Municipal Building, i Renton, Washington 98055, Phone: 235- ,/f„ / 2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office,First Floor,Municipal gal Cie' South County Journal o Building. I The Board of Adjustment public hearing originally scheduled fo'r-June 25, 1997'is canceled due to changes'in regulations Subscribed and sworn before me on this 0(a day o0-4�.,t-R , 19 - • governing the project.The project as pro- posed is prohibited from locating in the R-8 OSyY� q1-6 �l zone. �1®.`®evot0 _Ir Published in the South County Journal - �1-1,M,.,,hfi%1 , June 9,1,997.3150 ®, . `StoNF-rA,,4/6)I1 Notary Public of the State of Washington -- �vy.. '4, s 1� residing in Renton -Cc' N 0 T A R yN: �ii*j King County, Washington �0cn�;p�UBL�O,psi NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND CANCELLATION OF PUBLIC HEARING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. US WEST 1-405 PCS SITE LUA-97-041,ECF,ACU,V Applicant proposes to install a PCS wireless communications facility. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. The proposal includes a Variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential - 8 DU/AC (R-8) Zone. Location: 1416 N. 30th St. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on June 23, 1997. Written comments shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. The Board of Adjustment public hearing originally scheduled for June 25, 1997 is canceled due to changes in regulations governing the project. The project as proposed is prohibited from locating in the R-8 zone. Publication Date: June 09, 1997 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot • pgioimigggigimgigmigmgiggmgmimggignn:etrrorrgokttNimnoiaiiiiimgmmommigiiliiiimmiumgsiqwg On the day of MAA1 , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing E RC. detearmiv boys documents. This information was sent to: • Name Representing Department of Ecology Dick Anderson Department of Transportation KC Water Pollution Control Metro Department of Wildlife Larry Fisher Department of Fisheries David Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Sue Rumery City of Seattle Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom, Fisheries .' Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Rita Perstac Puget Power (Signature of Sender) aykale` STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ° ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 5A9"1 bRA 11 . signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the use litiiif purposes mentioned in the instrument. ' Dated: �� 9`7 ��(� /i,� . 6_s'u. �A NotaryPublic• and for t State of Wasffiri oit1.P n W Notary(Print) o �' o" 4 My appointment expire : a Project Name: US Wuc1 T-4O5 PGS Project Number: LON en • 041 ACV i V �L NOTARY.DOC o L CIT' JF RENTON ' ' . r, Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse T.anner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 29, 1997 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on May 27, 1997: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED US WEST 1-405 PCS SITE LUA-97-041,ECF,ACU,V • Applicant proposes to install a PCS wireless communications facility consisting of six(6) antennas mounted on an 80-foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. The proposal includes a Variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential - 8 DU/AC (R-8) Zone. Location: 1416 N. 30th St. Comment Process. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 17, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments.After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeal Process. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 17, 1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. If you have questions, please call me at(425) 277-6186. or e Environme al R vi w Committee, liobi ;r Toth -nning reMno Project ► : •=•er cc: King County Water Pollution Control Division, Metro Department of Wildlife Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Sue Rumery, City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Rita Perstac, Puget Power 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 6i2)This oaoer contains 50%recycled material.20%oust consumer • L CITA OF RENTON .:iL yI Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 29, 1997 Mr:' Russ Stromberg The Walter Group 1109 First Avenue South Seattle, WA 98101 SUBJECT: US West 1-405 PCS Site Project No. LUA-97-041,ECF,ACU,V Dear Mr. Stromberg: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on May 27, 1997, issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with conditions. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Environmental Determination Comment Process. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be 'fled in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 17, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana. Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 17, 1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be Medlin writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235- 2501. WAC 197-11-660 states that the responsibility for mitigation measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of the imposed action. Since an environmental impact statement has not been prepared for this project, any mitigation measure established by the ERC not directly attributable to an identified adverse impact is deemed to be voluntarily accepted by the applicant. Staff,urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g., the Public Works Division) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended for this project, if you have specific questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. DNSMLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 • • May 29, 1997 Page-2 Mr. Russ Stromberg The Walter Group • Project LUA-97-041,ECF,ACU,V May 29, 1997 Page-2- The date of Wednesday, June 25, 1997, at 7:30 PM, has been set for a public hearing to review the height variance request and finalize the Administrative Conditional Use (ACU) determination. The hearing, before the City of Renton's Board of Adjustment will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at.(425)277-6186. For the Environmental Review Committee, tad-) 111614/0/0 Jennifer Toth Henning . Project Manager cc: Mr. & Mrs. Keith Noess/Owners US West Communications-Wireless/Applicant Parties of Record: Ms. Gay Lee; Ms. Marlene Mandt; Ms. Connie Brundage; Mr. William Snell; Mr. George Sidebotham Enclosure • dnsmftr • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-041,ECF,SP APPLICANT: US West Communications PROJECT NAME: US West 1-405 PCS Site DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to install a PCS wireless communications facility consisting of six(6) antennas mounted on an 80-foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. The proposal includes a Variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC R-8 Zone. MITIGATION MEASURES: . . 1. In order to diminish the aesthetic impact of the proposed telecommunications facility on the adjacent residential neighborhood, and to meet the intent of Comprehensive Plan Policies U-100 and U-101, the applicant shall be required to: a) Meet the 30 foot height limit of the Residential -8 DU/AC (R-8) Zone. OR, b) The applicant shall provide documentation demonstrating that a good faith effort has been made to negotiate with other commercially zoned properties in order to locate or collocate the proposed monopole facility in the vicinity of North 30th Street and 1-405: AND 2. The applicant shall demonstrate compliance with the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) requirements for marking and lighting by providing written • verification to the Development Services Division of the specific FAA requirements and methods of achieving same. The applican/operator of the facility shall also be required to maintain any FAA required marking and/or lighting for the life of the facility. • • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-041,ECF,SP APPLICANT: US West Communications PROJECT NAME: US West 1-405 PCS Site DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to install a PCS wireless communications facility consisting of six(6) antennas mounted on an 80-foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located,adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. The proposal includes a Variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential- 8 DU/AC (R-8)Zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1416 North 30th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant:. The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Airport Manager. 1. The monopole would be 80 feet in height. With the attached antennas, the overall height would be 83 feet above a ground level of 227 feet above sea level. :A Notice of Proposed Construction should be filed with and approved by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) (Part 77 regulations) prior to the granting of a height variance or building permit. 2. The existing Texaco sign (located adjacent to this site) and the GTE monopole on the east side of 1-405 at North 30th Street are.taller than the proposed monopole. The City should consider whether it will require this monopole to be removed if the other structures are removed. 3. If lighting is required by the FAA, the applicant should be responsible for the inspection and maintenance of said lighting. If painting is required, the applicant should be required to maintain the painted surface. 4. NOTE: Applicant has submitted FM Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration dated October 21, 1996 which requires that the monopole be obstruction lighted per FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1, Chapters 4,5, and 13. Plan Review. 5. The.standards outlined in the City's Draft Wireless Communications Ordinance should be used in reviewing this proposal. (The draft ordinance would prohibit monopole heights above 60 feet at this location. • 1 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-041,ECF,Wea,V APPLICANT: US West Communications PROJECT NAME: US West 1-405 PCS Site DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to install a PCS wireless communications facility consisting of six (6) antennas mounted on an 80-foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. The proposal includes a Variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential- 8 DU/AC (R-8) Zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1416 North 30th Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. PUBLICATION DATE: June 02, 1997 DATE OF DECISION: May 27, 1997 SIGNATURES: Gregg Zi ernjap,Administrator / DATE Depart a of Planning/Building/Public Works Sam Chastain, dministrator DATE Community Service Department Fok Lee heeler, Fire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC Determination of Non-Significant_ __Jitioated "'US West 1-405 PCS Site Project No. LUA-97-041,ECF,CU,V Page -2- Environmental Determination Comment Process. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 17, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 17, 1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235- 2501. DNSMSIG.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-041,ECF;9Pw.V APPLICANT: US West Communications PROJECT NAME: US West 1-405 PCS Site DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to install a PCS wireless communications facility consisting of six(6) antennas mounted on an 80-foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. The proposal includes a Variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC(R-8) Zone. MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. In order to diminish the,aesthetic impact of the proposed telecommunications facility on the adjacent residential neighborhood, and to meet the intent of Comprehensive'Plan Policies:U-100 and U-101, the applicant shall be required to: a) Meet the 30 foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC (R-8) Zone. OR, - b) The applicant shall provide documentation demonstrating that a good faith effort has been made to,negotiate with other commercially zoned properties in order to locate or collocate the proposed monopole.facility in the vicinity of North 30th Street and 1-405. AND 2. The applicant shall demonstrate compliance with the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) requirements for marking and lighting by providing written • verification to the Development Services Division of the specific FAA requirements and methods of achieving same. The applican/operator of the facility shall also be required to maintain any FAA required marking and/or lighting for the life of the facility. � I • • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-041,ECF,SP , APPLICANT: US West Communications PROJECT NAME: US West 1-405 PCS Site DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to install a PCS wireless communications facility consisting of six(6) antennas mounted on an 80-foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. The proposal includes a Variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC (R-8)Zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1416 North 30th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant:::" The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Airport Manager. 1. The monopole would be 80 feet in height. With the attached antennas, the overall height would be 83 feet above a ground level of 227 feet above sea level. ;A Notice of Proposed Construction should be filed with and approved by the Federal Aviation Administration(FAA) (Part 77 regulations) prior to the granting of a height variance or building permit. 2. The existing Texaco sign (located adjacent to this site) and the GTE monopole on the east side of 1-405 at North 30th Street are taller than the proposed monopole. The City should consider whether it will require this monopole to be removed if the other structures are removed. 3. If lighting is required by the FAA, the applicant should be responsible for the inspection and maintenance of said lighting. If painting is required, the applicant should be required to maintain the painted surface. 4. NOTE: Applicant has submitted FAA Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration dated October 21, 1996 which requires that the monopole be obstruction lighted per FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1, Chapters 4,5, and 13. Plan Review. ' 5. The.standards outlined in the City's Draft Wireless Communications Ordinance should be used in reviewing this proposal. (The draft ordinance would prohibit monopole heights above 60 feet at this location. ' 1 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION . NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL Kristina Thompson, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of DETERMINATION AND PUBLIC the HEARING SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL ENVIRONMEN AN,L REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTThe Environmental Review Committee 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 (ERC)has issued a Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated for the following a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months US WEST I-405 PCS SITE prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language LUA-97-041,ECF,V,ACU wire- continuallyas a dailynewspaper in Kent, KingCounty, Washington. The South CountyApplicanto proposescationtof install a PCS Y 9 less communications facility. The facility Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the would be located adjacent to the south- State of Washington for King County. - bound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. ' •The proposal includes a Variance request The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the South County to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers Residential - 8 DU/AC (R-8) Zone. I duringthe below statedperiod. The annexed notice, a Location:Te1day oNm 30th St. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The U.S. West- 1-405 PSS Site comment/appeal periods for this project will ' end at 5:00 PM on June 17, 1997.Written comments shall be forwarded to the as published on: 6/2/97 Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the pro- The full amount of the fee charged for said fo oingect imposedfile andy the mitigationyof measures g publication is the sum of$61.76 by the city of Renton's Legal Number 3112 Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235- f �.� 2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office,First Floor,Municipal Legal CI , South unty Journal Building. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Board of Adjustment at its regular , meeting in the Council Chambers, on the Subscribed and sworn before me on this IAdday otV r-A- -L, 19 I 1 , second floor of City Hall, Renton, ' ' Washington,on June 25, 1997 at 7:30 PM to consider the variance portion of this application.All interested persons to said ��a��9 1a — petitions are invited to be present at the ‘),, Public Hearing to express their opinions. `A . • )' Published in the South County Journal Notary Public of the State of Washington A�-..:- June 2,1997.3112 ��' f residing in Renton ----- ---- __ _� o `: , i; ' 4 _ # King County, Washington { ems# o, oaW`SN�\�� NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND PUBLIC HEARING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. US WEST 1-405 PCS SITE LUA-97-041,ECF,ACU,V Applicant proposes to install a PCS wireless communications facility. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. The proposal includes a Variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential - 8 DU/AC (R-8)Zone. Location: 1416 N. 30th St. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on June 17, 1997. Written comments shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Board of Adjustment at its regular meeting in the Council Chambers, on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on June 25, 1997 at 7:30 PM to consider the variance portion of this application. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing to express their opinions. Publication Date: June 02, 1997 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot . , . il...ctlitincE , . . . • . . ____, ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND PUBLIC HEARING POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION , PROJECT NAME: US WEST I-405 PCS SITE PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-041,ECF,ACU,V The applicant proposes to install a PCS wireless communications facility consisting of six(6)antennas , mounted on an 80-foot tall support monopole,and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405,Exit 0.•The proposal includes a Variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC(R. ' 8)Zone.Location:1418 North 30th Street. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED • THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE • ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. n YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON JUNE 17,1997 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM,JUNE 17.1997. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS , WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. • A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AT ITS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS,ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JUNE 25. 1997 AT 7:30 PM TO CONSIDER THE VARIANCE ' 1 PORTION OF THIS APPLICATION. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE , INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. • N. 31 T ST. �+ ,., 38 fli • :,L+(4,-I'. . , cJ' N. 30TH ST. t -1 d'1 71;[j;C�( p.0 0 p a " ( " : 1 >< 1 :I .,.••:,.:. : _. P _ 11 • . 1:! t5 l z f:n!�htl,` ti 1 : �`i i N. 29TH 5T. a :40 `I -41 i 4 ,' • N. 2(TH PL. e _ l'a .j lb: ' FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION IPlease Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification. ' • CERTIFICATTON - • • I, Sa,hC jGix, Sdy . hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posl�by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . Signed: c_vAitout, gict,k/),ert STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) ' - • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that irvDy .1/1-c ,J signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and volura� r .v'or�3he uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. y:••Q, Dated: q3oloi • •M ��«©ny ' Notary Pu I in a for the Sta. .of_Waglii gion i Notary (Print) MARGARET.J."f'ULLAR My appointment expir . NO TAR Y,DOC • II __) / :-. ,-- ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND PUBLIC HEARING POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: US WEST 1-405 PCS SITE PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-041,ECF,ACU,V The applicant proposes to install a PCS wireless communications facility consisting of six(6) antennas mounted on an 80-foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. The proposal includes a Variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC(R- . 8)Zone. Location: 1416 North 30th Street. THE!CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE . ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. ' xxx YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON JUNE 17, 1997 OR APPEAL i- THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM, JUNE 17, 1997. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE. HELD BY THE RENTON BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AT ITS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JUNE 25, 1997 AT 7:30 PM TO CONSIDER THE VARIANCE PORTION OF THIS APPLICATION. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. .,.:.n0~]3 ]l� ,61 •'u.3)"r� ]I ]0!2., !27��6 s, I i:: 1:1 N. 31 T ST. 38 v mrf f: 1- ,C'] /!;x 2f?s x I I 1 • i'°- z:2----1-7-":14. "' .- iioilj , f�'�f 10II 1� • ::,��,:t =0.21 I2_'-3 i/Jl:; T 1;� srA' ,Ig, •I oI• I: A`0p1 ,6 1 . • . 1 . 1 w. .DO f;»:,, >< . , . ,.,. in-- �- , •� N. 30TH ST. n s = . _ - IEIV tid let e: • � � .:,s l..s-�q is -_i}1. _ ;s\.,%; 1.i is�]J 3tl,S! �"jd']4,]S�:I1T.1 �,�j,7�'. �E•1 17r,.2�6 • ••• iti N. 29TH ST. I . - 1 40 'I - 4, I 4� M if v f0 l�Q• to i�1 Y-- (4 •W 1z 1`7yi s 13 I! 1711u Pi ITS 11-t zEl�l 241 tea ' .I I"' �� I m'- ,3, I4E _ r a 3 '�ob. 4L'�1"-_I 4 , , 1411t6 i 3a 30I-. ]s 30.'_• 3Z•{I.1130'.'.`. 25'271.26 •...'' 't. 1n.•..I" vi I 5 :--r • v. N. 28TH PL. . r. U .z .� ib: 1 inc.;_® '•I .. . • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ....:.... . Ill e ,Cali ,fn ro r.:fil id�.n-•-•' 1. i`';.:s;. >;;;:>Ple'aise>tnclude::the:, ro ectNUMBER'wh n.. :. I n�;::,:::r.:.p: p�:<:.;:.:..:;.,.....:...,.:::::::::.... .:: :::.:.<>>:<;:::,::,. STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE May 27, 1997 Project Name US WEST 1-405 PCS Site Applicant US WEST Communications File Number LUA-097-041, CU, V, ECF Project Manager Jennifer Toth Henning Project Description The applicant proposes to install a PCS wireless communications facility consisting of six(6) antennas mounted on an 80-foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. The proposal includes a Variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential - 8 DU/AC (R-8) Zone. The proposed monopole would be galvanized steel. Six antennas are proposed for mounting on the pole,these would be approximately 42 inches long, five inches wide, and four inches deep. The applicant is considering the addition of up to three antennas which could be installed on the monopole at a later date, if it was determined to be necessary to meet service demand. Equipment cabinets would be installed on a 9-1/2 foot by 12 foot concrete pad. An additional cabinet may be placed on the pad at a later date to accommodate growth of the system. The cabinets would be placed slightly into a berm. The cabinets would be partially hidden from view by the berm. In addition, a slatted chainlink fence would screen the cabinets. Accessory devices installed at the facility include a geostationary positioning system antenna (a few inches in length), a lightning rod, and parking bollards. The proposed facility would be unattended. US'West expects maintenance visits to the site to be no more than once each month, or as little as once per quarter. Since maintenance visits would be infrequent,the applicant is not proposing to provide additional parking. An existing two-story apartment building is located approximately 60 feet west of the monopole site. A Texaco fuel/service station is located southwest of the subject parcel. Interstate 405 is located to the east and single family residential housing is located to the north. Clusters of evergreen trees border the site on the north and south. Additional trees on the west half of the property obscure views of the structures from properties to the southwest. The applicant intends to begin construction upon the completion of the land use and environmental review process. Project Location 1416 North 30th Street Project Location Map ERCRP7:DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department ronmental Review Committee Staff Report US WEST 1-405 PCS S11Re LUA-93-041, CU, T,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFMay 27,1997 Page2 of4 Exist. Bldg. Area gsf N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf approx. 100 sq ft Site Area approx 550 square feet Total Building Area gsf approx 100 sq ft RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF X DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 da A eal Period. a Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The height of the monopole shall be reduced to 60 feet or relocated out of the R-8 Zone in order to diminish aesthetic impacts on properties zoned for single family residential use. The applicant shall be required to amend the landscape planting plan to include a dense screen of ornamental vegetation on the perimeter of the equipment compound. The landscape plan must be approved by the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of any building/construction permits. Advisory Notes to Applicant: ,The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Airport Manager. '1. The monopole would be 80 feet in height. With the attached antennas,the overall height would be 83 feet above a ground level of 227 feet above sea level. A Notice of Proposed Construction should be filed with and approved by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) (Part 77 regulations) prior to the granting of a height variance or building permit. 2. The existing Texaco sign (located adjacent to this site) and the GTE monopole on the east side of 1-405 at North 30th Street are taller than the proposed monopole. The City should consider whether it will require this monopole to be removed if the other structures are removed. 3. If lighting is required by the FAA,the applicant should be responsible for the inspection and maintenance of said lighting. If painting is required,the applicant should be required to maintain the painted surface. 4. NOTE: Applicant has submitted FAA Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration dated October 21, 1996 which requires that the monopole be obstruction lighted per FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1, Chapters 4,5, and 13. Plan Review. 5. The standards outlined in the City's Draft Wireless Communications Ordinance should be used in reviewing this proposal. 6. The draft ordinance would prohibit monopole heights above 60 feet at this location. Height of the monopole should be limited to 60 feet, due to the site's location in the R-8 Zone. This will be a recommended condition of the Conditional Use Permit. If the applicant insists on pursuing this proposal at this location then they must demonstrate ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment ronmental Review Committee Staff Report US WEST 1-405 PCS STTEe LUA-93-041,CU, V,,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFMay 27,1997 Page3 of 4 why this additional height is necessary, and that alternative sites are not a viable solution. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? 1. Surface Water Impacts: The project site would be a leased area of approximately 550 square feet in size. The proposal would add a concrete slab of approximately 108 square feet in size to the site. The applicant contends that any storm water runoff from this impervious area will be able to infiltrate into the ground. City Code does not require detention or stormwater quality facilities for this amount of new impervious surface. Mitigation Measures: None required. Nexus: N/A 2. Earth Impacts: The project would have a minor amount of grading which would occur for the construction of a retaining wall around the north, east, and south boundaries of the equipment compound. The applicant will need to install and maintain temporary erosion control measures to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division inspector. Mitigation Measures: None required. Nexus: N/A 3. Air Impacts: Adverse impacts to air quality during the construction phase of the project would be limited to fugitive dust during the time that grading would expose the surface soils, and to exhaust emitted from construction vehicles. Fugitive dust can be controlled by sprinkling the site as required during the construction phase of the project. Air quality impacts from the construction vehicles would be temporary in nature and is already regulated by state and federal standards. Mitigation Measures: None required. Nexus: N/A 4. Aesthetics Impacts: The proposal would result in the installation of an 80-foot tall monopole in an area zoned for development of single family residential dwellings (R-8). According to requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration,the applicant will be required to provide appropriate lighting at the top of the monopole per the FAA Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration. Presently a multi-family residential apartment building occupies a portion of the site. The remainder of the subject parcel is vacant and is located adjacent to Interstate 405. The applicant is proposing to screen the equipment compound with a wire mesh fence (chain-link)that has wood slates, and to plant shrubs along the north and south ERCRPT.DOC iy 'City of Renton PB/PWDepartment onmental Review Committee Staff Report US WEST I-405 PCS SITEe LUA-93-041, CU, V,ECF 'REPORT AND DECISION OFMay 27,1997 Page4 of4 perimeters of the fence. Existing site vegetation would partially screen views of the equipment cabinets and monopole, however,the monopole would be out of character with the surrounding single family area, increasing the visual complexity through the introduction of a tall vertical element. Existing pole signs for service stations exist in the adjacent Convenience Commercial zoning designation located to the south. Also, an existing telecommunications monopole, approximately 25 feet higher than the proppsal, is located on the opposite side of Interstate 405 at North ' 30th Street. However, existing signs and telecommunications monopole are within zoning districts intended for commercial development, not single family residential homes. Mitigation Measures: The height of the monopole shall be reduced to 60 feet or relocated out of the R-8 Zone in order to diminish aesthetic impacts on properties zoned for single family residential use. The applicant shallbe required to amend the landscape planting plan to include.a dense screen of.omamental vegetation on the perimeter of the equipment compound. The landscape planmust be approved by the Development Services Division prior to the I issuance of any building/construction.permits. Nexus: Environmental Ordinance, Code Section 4-6. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report.. - ERCRPT.DOC NVIRONMENTALREVIEVWCOM roommiiiimmimummingilmammeimmisom To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Sam Chastain, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief • From: Jim Hanson & Mike Kattermann loll:.:+�tiitlG Oa#e:.>::»::»::>::;::; Tues ay::::>M�.::>2:7:::�... :9....:.................................................................................................................................................................. .. .. . ....................:::::::::::::::::. L�catran >:>.;:<:»::;;::;::;::;::>::»::»:Thir+d::: :::laor:>> r3n. ................................................................................................................................................... . ............... ............................ Agenda listed below. • SW 7th Street Office/Warehouse (new) (Pi/well/5586) LUA-97-057,SA,ECF • The applicant seeks approval to construct a 34,585 s.f. office/warehouse building for speculative uses. Location: SW 7th Street, East of Powell Avenue SW. Renton Technical College Parking Lot (new) (Powell/5586) LUA-97-061,ECF The applicant seeks to construct a 76 stall parking lot on the Renton Technical College campus. The applicant's intent is to provide adequate on-site parking in accordance with the City's Parking and Loading Ordinance. Recent increases in the number of staff and students requires that additional parking be provided. Location: 3000 NE 4th Street. • US West PCS on Sunset (new) (Henning/6186) LUA-97-049,ECF The applicant proposes to install a PCS wireless communications facility consisting of six (6) antennas mounted on a 125-foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located inside an existing storage shed. Location: 4546 NE Sunset Boulevard. US West 1-405 PCS Site (new) (Henninq/6186) LUA-97-041,ECF,ACU,V The applicant proposes to install a PCS wireless communications facility consisting of six (6) antennas mounted on an 80-foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. The proposal includes a Variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential - 8 DU/AC (R-8) Zone. Location: 1416 North 30th Street. cc: J.Covington,Executive Assistant to the Mayor L.Warren,City Attorney (R) F.Kaufman,Hearing Examiner S.Carlson,Economic Development Director (R) J.Gray,Fire Prevention A.Larson,Fire (R) P.Pierce,P/B/PW Admin. - i . ` --_c'REVISION #2 (MAY 20, 1997)- NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION AND PUBLIC HEARING RENTON, WASHINGTON Meeting dates have changed due to a request for additional information from the applicant, US West. This notice is to advise you of changes in meeting dates. An Environmental Review Checklist(ECF),Administrative Conditional Use (ACU) and Variance (V)Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. • PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: US WEST 1-405 PCS SITE/LUA-97-041,ACU,V,ECF DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a Personal Communication Systems (PCS) wireless communication facility consisting of an 80-foot tall support monopole with six(6) antennas and two (2) equipment cabinets located at the • base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. Proposal includes a variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC (R-8)Zone by 50 feet. I GENERAL LOCATION: 1416 North 30th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review(ECF) Conditional Use (ACU) ' Variance (V) I • The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) meeting date, Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative decision. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. The date of Wednesday,June 25, 1997,at 7:30 PM, has been set for a public hearing to review the Administrative Conditional Use and Variance. The hearing, before the City of Renton's Board of Adjustment, will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, WA: Interested parties are invited to attend. If an appeal is filed on the ERC threshold determination,the appeal will also be heard at this meeting. I .. ..fr...p1•—I---, -,` -—�...f - -- ------ I :I••40-.39•'336' 37 6 36 1 ...34:33 31 ; 30; 29 1 27 '6 257 I 157 77 r�`' N. 3l T ST. 38 • 1I5•„_5':5• •55: •.v2S 5[ tt SC �I I , lo'; + :Div :1 •-11 I2J ' , . I I _ I 1 2 Z k7 O', i.% ,°-I I ' :10 ' 11 , 11? i ` . :o LJ+ II.•IC x �-''20.21 I[_1 33i QI25 �a7----M .�1 I,^� - i r� �' -7,. -SfRv i f eiuur.l i• Itil I *IN S0. 3 il �-.? � i 7s I : g? ?Si 1 .• 6 Iv,SfA. Ic 1, f i b a ,1 ` Ili; if, ,• _ !7�:!a. },: •g• - ••I SC •i I , 1 i r. I u' 80 I iC• • 1 a^1' 70 15121 50 3C :5 t>, 52 1 • ,�•1 I - a '^' , so W 150 •50 57 I a t: 6425 I ---�� ..I 1�1 I P:Ire`'- ..TI6 I. I: ' W > op 1285 R6.5 1�4: 1 40I 3.11 33:37 3y' 3,,..34 I =3 Jtr3. i .2E•170,26 '" .. ..- i �^ 1 la Jl • I al. li 11 1 1 1 71 lallill 1 • 1 1 I el .�, 11• N. 29TH ST. 7 q" 1 ,Q O - . 41 4� ^ 50 33 73 50 I '1 y I • I 1 I .^ :I l0 1I 15' 100a_ 157 ,..__L__ i I2.'! 1 128.5 ' 1 , r_•I j I ! Imo'�It] lW ''1 1301 f0 de ou, 1 It I i5 115 1 17 I to I i I (a'1211 1241 a . _ , I '� i2 4 1a 4, 1 46 13: 13b I:.. 3C 35 34`3,-riF 113u~µ--2S!27 26 _ t4i _: 1n -..I• y+ j 1,• ., ,� N ; 25 I ♦..nil +:15I: +� 1 GENMAIL2.DOC 'Q Ip —I .. i I . • . a Z2. i`1- a<I : aL-- a Waal I I . I 1 • 1 50 125 RS 150 .25:25. So` >o / r_----I -t-r' I +I N. 28TH PL. . - _ ..tj� _ .4 _ kli;_ _ _-Ii C ; -'' •- --- Mr. &Mrs. Fred Jones Mr.Albert Miller Ms. Bertha Miller 408 Midway Avenue 3108 Park Avenue North 1307 North 32nd Street San Mateo, CA 94402 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Mr. Henry Hanks Mr. Timothy Shao Ms. Patricia Ecklund/Ms. Gay Lee 1409 North 32nd Street Ms. Shie-Lin Zong 1427 North 32nd Renton, WA 98056 12923 NE 29th Renton, WA 98056 Bellevue, WA 98005 Mr. Barry Oppie Mr. Jacob Deal Texaco Inc.-Tax Dept. Box 292 1415 North 32nd Street PO Box 7813 Ravensdale, WA 98051 Renton, WA 98055 Universal City, CA 91608 Mr. & Mrs. G. Sidebotham Southland Corporation Ski Investment 1404 North 30th 2711 North Haskell Avenue, Box 711 1302 North 30th Renton, WA 98055 Dallas, WA 75221 Renton, WA 98056 Brownie's Lawn Shop Quality Building Maintenance Mr. Wan Chee 1305 North 30th Street 408 Second Avenue W. 13028 NE 32nd Place Renton, WA 98056 Seattle, WA 98119 Bellevue, WA 98005 Chevron USA, Inc.-Property Mr. & Mrs. Paul Miller 575 Market Street 3623 Lincoln Avenue NE San Francisco, CA 98105 Renton, WA 98056. A4acevk •Fteopeyti, Owv‘eK v o \c.d S f'2► I ll s .S . ' , __. . r • . ... a . N !JT1OE PENDING APPLICATION AND PUBLIC • • HEARING PROJECT NAMEINUMBER: US WEST 1-405 PCS SITE/LUA-97-641,ACU,V,ECF DESCRIPTION: Proposal fora Personal Communication Systems(PCS)wireless communication ' facility consisting of an 80-foot tall support monopole with six(6)antennas and two(2)equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole.The facility would be located adjacent to the suulhbound off-ramp of Interstate 405,Exit 8, Proposal Includes a variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC(R-8)Zone by 50 feet, GENERAL LOCATION: 1416 NORTH 30TH STREET PUBLIC APPROVALS: ' _Building Permit _Preliminary Plat _Short Plat XXXX Administrative Conditional Rezone Site Plan Approval • Use Permit XXXX Environmental Review _Shoreline Conditional Use XXXX VARIANCE Permit Fill&Grade Permit _Shoreline Substantial _Other Development Permit The application can be reviewed In the Development Services Division located an the third floor of Renton City Hall. • Comments will be accepted any lime prior to Environmental Review Committee(ERC)meetings,Public Hearings,during • Public Hearings,or prior to an administrative decision. For further information on the application,or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications.please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. • PUBLIC HEARING. The date of Wednesday,June 25.1997 at 7:30 PM,has been set for a public hearing to review the Administrative Conditional Use and Variance.The hearing,before the City of Renton's Board of Adjustment,will be held in the • Council Chambers on the second Boor of City Hall,Renton,WA.Interested parties are Invited to attend. If an . appeal is filed on the ERC threshold detemrinatlon,the appeal will also be heard at this meeting. am- 1. IC,.IU S 1 �5t 'I I 7! rl ! - _": 3r ;1 g.^,(Z.."'l Ff; _...6C�!!1-'6 i•Y 6, ...L ))•I_] 11. C.t. 1 Zfr,6 ,r I m121338 i N. 31 T ST. a • • 'Q; L� jc;, j' "t . a L /., ..,.ram_ I':'�•.i •I y. 2li:7:l i:.T�l i 1(.]I. 1,'=Jv L r `' „e .1 LJ /t I c • N. 30TH ST. -=1r =rs , _ rz 111---�_.Y,`i=i-Ji _ t .. _.r ' a.ICI IJ b.D _4' °C,i4•41.,, •2% ,E.a,Ze F e i .1t1 15 • N. 29TH 5T. x -----;a0 I " 41 ' T 42. l\� - G10 I,t 5 11,I IJ i,a I I l�zzr I z.,I a' 4 3 I __.___. 2„,44 1'=C7 4" )tt N. 28TH PL. ,. ., o 4.------= PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION. 1 CERTIFICATION _ . I. J GU!1 � tag� � hereby certify that ,3 copies of the above document were posted me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . /r�r,� , a , 1q�— Signed:/ S'e.." - jJi,..4.4yl STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) SS COUNTY OF KING • ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that S D1 J4CKc 'd signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and volunta:rva tvfor,the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. _. Dated: 0 /'� / /4 " ' 2y r Public' .I Stal.c?f' his lo'n • Notary in d for ) . r4.t.,9 V . Notary (Print) MARGAI ET Y..PULLAR My appointment expire • NO TAR Y•DOC ...• • NO1I . PENDING APPLICATION AND PUBLIC HEARING PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: US WEST 1-405 PCS SITE/LUA-97-041,ACU,V,ECF DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a Personal Communication Systems(PCS)wireless communication facility consisting of an 80-foot tall support monopole with six(6)antennas and two(2)equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. Proposal includes a.variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC(R-8)Zone by 50 feet. GENERAL LOCATION: 1416 NORTH 30TH STREET PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit Preliminary Plat Short Plat XXXX Administrative Conditional Rezone Site Plan Approval Use Permit XXXX Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Use XXXX VARIANCE Permit Fill&Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial Other Development Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. • Comments will be accepted any time prior to Environmental Review Committee(ERC)meetings,Public Hearings,during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative decision. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications,please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. PUBLIC HEARING: The date of Wednesday,June 25.1997,at 7:30 PM,has been set for a public hearing to review the Administrative Conditional Use and Variance. The hearing,before the City of Renton's Board of Adjustment,will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall,Renton,WA. Interested parties are invited to attend. If an appeal is filed on the ERC threshold determination,the appeal will also be.heard at this meeting.0:M . IL� 1! i• i. ' . 4I-"40~39• .3' 36 lr'34:37 31 ; 30• ; 29 ir?�i 27 '6 zs Iss s" / =j,{ ',i:2a• `Y' i - • /- I 1..'': I 38 N. 31ST ST. '_' .YP :13::5 S.) I :m '`�; !'=:"c12` `-r. I i ! Sc Z _! .N ,' JP, jJy cl a� i 1 II .,,• 10. !I y„1� la ,' :e 1'. .1,tc./ °0 i 2!_12:i i %41 1.52 167____t-----�R ='Cy_, L �{ y='_-I--.._--4 ��-i::- — i---- oval I ; r —. —_'fi•r • �I SfRvSTA., �MCI I I° y‘0of 6 • I�,c I 1 t, 0:25 50 . ar •`1 Sr '• . I ! I 1 I I u- a0 :,r• 1.. 69 N. 30TH 1. .ST. :... !L 751 0 5f '51, 50 j I rr. 1• SG — 150 ' 50 . 57 i b7: I °475 I N -T�:; ;EP ' IIBS 128.5 :i :En ZiEt '.:. ! 1n•Y.. 3 -:4 If ! ' _,sly; 4 °7 i `., 4, 1 6.133 t 36 37 34:_ 34 1 33~:It 131 I 29 2G' a 20 I m { v.1 �� to g• ` 1 :1--g ar , M Iala' j . I � 1 `.•. li . I . [�1=11,E=y;kx:-; . i ' i "I 1' 'sd �� I I .N. 29TH ST. ;4 0 " ;- 4,I ! 4K • .. s° SS „ 50 I I 1 1 N I I I I I , 1 1 o i T•15� r 100_L_ 167 ._..__,... !0 124.5 123e '� .] El1�''?-I� l� :O i IDI' I '� ' Y' -- 1 I ry alln WJ .It 'l3 1 ;3 I16 i 17 ' to I�° I J j � 12124I---, 124 j Cr 3 rl I 1 I ri I IZS. I !II .I 1 1 •r- Q _` 2�,Q, iM y1 l� �s , QI 4v� 1 4; i Gli 3:9 i 3A .•.. 35 341 3: 37'I 1 I 12S•Z7126 a ....-•— -i ..'99._..{v 1n4.1 t1 I' --r` 4� r• �V c • I 1 .�Ir , I 'T8Q8 _ �I I m I J s=a1 ' 01 I i • I I Sc Iz517s1 I sr as'i5. so' I!° ao , r 1 , I I, Q • a N. 28TH PL. L, . �, 'L. i ' ir1' -J -' • J'kEASE INCLUDE ThE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR:PROPER'FILE'IDENTIFICATION:i::i: `;:<: y CITY OF RENTON ..� ' Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 21, 1997 Mr. Russ Stromberg The Walter Group 1109 First Avenue South Seattle,WA 98101 SUBJECT: US West 1-405 PCS Site Project No.LUA-97-041,ACU,V,ECF Dear Mr.Stromberg: On April 11, 1997,the Development Services Division accepted your land use application for review. You were originally advised that the Administrative Conditional Use (ACU)portion of this application would be reviewed by the Board of Adjustment(BOA). Upon further review,we advised you that the ACU and Variance(V)portions of your application would be reviewed by the Hearing Examiner. Based upon your request, we consulted the City Attorney, who advised us that the project ACU and V need to be reviewed by the Board of Adjustment, as originally stated. In addition, if an appeal is filed on the Environmental Review.Committee's (ERC) threshold determination,then the appeal will also be heard by the BOA. Your project was considered by the ERC on May 13, 1997. They have tabled the item pending receipt of additional information. The item has been tentatively rescheduled for May 27, 1997. The date of Wednesday, June 25, 1997, at 7:30 PM, has been set for a public hearing to review the Administrative Conditional Use and Variance. The hearing, before the City of Renton's Board of Adjustment will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If you prefer to make other arrangements to receive the staff report, please contact Sandi Seeger,277-5581. Interested parties are invited to attend. I apologize for the confusion over the scheduling of the public hearing, and hope that you have not been unduly inconvenienced. Please contact me, at 277-6186, if you have any questions. Sincerely, J nnifer Toth Henning P G✓ oject Manager cc: Mr.&Mrs. Keith Noess/Owners US West Communications-Wireless/Applicant Parties of Record Board of Adjustment ACCPTLR1.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ;y L` CITE JF RENTON :.0 ` Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 8, 1997 Mr. Russ Stromberg The Walter Group 1109 First Avenue South Seattle, WA 98101 SUBJECT: US West 1-405 PCS Site Project No. LUA-97-041,CU,V,ECF. Dear Mr. Stromberg: On April 11, 1997, the Development Services Division accepted your land use application for review. You were originally advised that the Conditional Use (CU) portion of this application would be reviewed by the Board of Adjustment. Upon further review, we are hereby advising you that the CU and Variance (V) portions of your application will be reviewed by the Hearing Examiner. Further information is outlined below. Your project has been re-scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on May 13, 1997. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. The date of Tuesday, June 17, 1997, at 9:00 AM, has been set for a public hearing to review the Conditional Use and Variance. The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The applicant or. representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If you prefer to make other arrangements to receive the staff report, please contact Sandi Seeger, 277-5581. Interested parties are invited to attend. Please contact me, at 277-6186, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jennifer Toth Henning Project Manager cc: Mr. & Mrs. Keith Noess/Owners US West Communications-Wireless/Applicant Parties of Record ACCPTLRI.DOC 200 Miiii Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 i]Th:...nnn.wnnlnnn Gno%.n......1...1...........1 nno%...................... N011n[CEa PENDING APPLICATION AND PUBLIC ' HEARING PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: US WEST I-405 PCS SITE/LUA-97.041,CU,V,ECF DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a Personal Communication Systems(PCS)wireless communication facility consisting of an 80-foot tell support monopole with six(B)antennas and two(2)equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole.The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405,Exit B. Proposal includes a variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC(R-B)Zone by 50 feet. • GENERAL LOCATION: 1418 NORTH 30TH STREET PUBLIC APPROVALS: _Building Permit _Preliminary Plat _Short Plat • XXXX Conditional Use Permit _Rezone _Site Plan Approval , XXXX Environmental Review _Shoreline Conditional Use XXXX VARIANCE Permit _Fill&Grade Permit _Shoreline Substantial _Other ' Development Permit ' The application can be reviewed In the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. . Comments will be accepted any time prior to Environmental Review Committee(ERC)meetings,Public Hearings,during . Public Hearings,or prior to an administrative decision. For further Information on the application,or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications,please contact the Development Services Division al 235-2550. PUBLIC HEARING; . The date of Tuesday,June 17,199T,at 9:00 AM,has been set for a public hearing to review the Conditional Use end Variance.The hearing,before Mr.Fred Kaufman,Renton Hearing Examiner,will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall,Renton,Washington.All interested persons are invited to be present at the Public Hearing . to express their opinions. Wp U� )rr'NISI"d yfl.�l.iu t&j' orJ,U n,�' ilil ��� 1 .: G7ti.Cl Iprr7 Ca L� 1 N //w • ,4:. Y. ..zd.. :. ,,':� u �r l ei&`�fiQ y, • J,Iv_4,ka.g_A aC � ill . Vrt-•, . •];•.eoit^q o"I'-2.,— _p .fir 4D�� . r,1bn—.. ,:,U, i'II y ' FrL''••4.�uN�,Yr1o5.1A.,sn�fJrS°:.a 2)1 0 coo,, -'0. - • ,L�ub�u .j...E 'j WC 0.`$hrq I Ic U.0 a© •,.� i;J. e n f • •I!�S GI m" stop c ocM `L3'S}• •• .43. x • 3;� r o o cal v., . -:..a,,, _ ., Nil L , �� � -ir ."D,bHIt 411ASiinICN�'' 1:4ti • ]5Qq'-' pplaP0 oahco6 • I CJQ :m 111. ' t P(5SN , � r'Ataco..F� 0 ,6n ff. i[po hd__n11S7_� 13 uoam9 d i ' •---yam as l .c is 5 -reun.11 l'S O r i 7—.1, i'J Lv:u}moo•. .... __ddo 1i �`O'" -p 3r h �b manaJ li.::,i. ....'. . _�o-p _ , 7' Or o0o'' pi c r, ,,..,ci r°.,.0'n'I - 13 4'- -:+F r no..o_U 6.20O .a,. o Dob �ia I�iiul • \0rr -none,eeiiru .I_`*- -r•r"- r-,.,k.�- 'W. _ PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION. • CERTIFICATION . I, ca,r1 d " JCL.C,<SG1u 1 , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted t�r me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . • Signed: 90/) / JAJ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) . • ) SS COUNTY OF KING )• / certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ' 1)� • GI�C-�4n� signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and volun a...nyl\aet,4or the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrumen . ti.:;•s6_6`�. •Dated: b—/g/q`7 s • Notary P is in and f r the Sta-ti$•ykWG �s�Q Tgtoh Notary tint) f} /9�E1 s.._� i My appointment expires: Vgyiqf • NOTARY,DOC ,_ N * TICE PENDING APPLICATION AND PUBLIC HEARING. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: US WEST 1-405 PCS SITE/LUA-97-041,CU,V,ECF DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a Personal Communication Systems(PCS)wireless communication facility consisting of an 80-foot tall support monopole with six(6)antennas and two(2)equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. Proposal includes a variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC(R-8)Zone by 50 feet. GENERAL LOCATION: 1416 NORTH 30TH STREET PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit Preliminary Plat Short Plat XXXX Conditional Use Permit Rezone Site Plan Approval XXXX Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Use XXXX VARIANCE Permit Fill&Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial Other Development Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any time prior to Environmental Review Committee(ERC)meetings,Public Hearings,during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative decision. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications,please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. PUBLIC HEARING: The date of Tuesday,June 17, 1997,at 9:00 AM, has been set for a public hearing to review the Conditional Use and Variance. The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner,will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall,Renton,Washington.All interested persons are invited to be present at the Public Hearing to express their opinions. 1: ei OMST . !(.'41!;,,R1 CO cill:!CVM V4 at.-41.,9W'' :.;.,....- :itrtin7ra');u '01 ill •T- N" , 1 / ! 4' .rJ II K ' • 69 ��'2�-ti=aexY.v:- 23�! .:11 i I.�,;,:1. . :1.. l : tr: r I . 66 Q�_f a , :;�'.:.ps,_ .w...u�'-�7�_��.-_...�,_ptrU.C�.u�.:,t��l�: ,{ .- _ > __ N • 34TH • ST." .. I ... - t„ °eea0bl d.` °' r_Og F3. a re 'w 1. i lr " 0 - 1 ° 6 '~ia[i-s ,�1�;.41.�; 9'.�� ,t�`,'G `;Y� � .!,,_r.r J�I� ill y I o 1. s N 33H0 PL. Z 6 Slm ,q 'nf f Y? i, rE,,,,,� },y17 _^``�� AA n 3 e32�o. 1',ll ji; u N l ef9' `T� I. '.d,,. ..S''1' "A.'0, �!� '`o s)„ 62 T11 N. 33RD ST �. �I(� 'f; irl II (n'tM'.: •c:P:6 H I Lti.„.M ,Na ,:,-I81g .�' iAsal�GT.�.Nr'? .. ..: I_1. J I y� __,... =cc 06�:.f.,—,tC_t- ,....,> N. 32ND• ST.. Ili 'C . •• Q �I- N 32ND 5T 5 � rI I I , `' , ]T . o tI M ' FvogrD iir a DI�1 N I ;,, , N. 313T 5T. l' � 3e I'' 3 56 57 1 i z ... 11 EI 59.; 1 _.11- .. Jib' aPd is I J �o4 l aa° cl.• - �,d."T'- IlI 'Y yl:t'rc,Q,-,an!`,= 'i-R'Tc•...;:_-_1:,..-_cxr.' •_ ouJ IH -1_lt,s, H. 29TH si : o 41 42 ICI ;'49=-, 1 N 28TN PL. I`, ••. 'R 19TTI'z'$j;-•i.7:.: -N.i —28TH—•�.gT..-. --iJE^.—?BTH-,ST 1 ATL'AS OF SEATTLE KROLL MAE COMPARE.INC,SEATTLE sPLEASE INCLUDE>THE::PROJECT:NUMBERWHEN`CALLING EORPROPEkA E.IDENTWICATION g.;:>" I i NO1'1,,E OF PUBLIC HEARING (REVISION) I RENTON, WASHINGTON 1 The date of Tuesday, June 17, 1997, at 9:00 AM, has been set for a public hearing to review the Conditional Use and Variance. The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the'Council Chambers on the second.floor of City Hall, Renton,Washington. Interested parties are invited to attend. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: US WEST 1-405 PCS SITE/LUA-97-041,CU,V,ECF DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a Personal Communication Systems (PCS) wireless communication facility consisting of an 80-foot tall support monopole with six(6) antennas and two (2) equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. Proposal includes a variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC (R-8) Zone by 50 feet. i GENERAL LOCATION: 1416 North 30th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review(ECF) Conditional Use (CU). I Variance (V) The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) meeting date, Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative decision. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for ro er file identification.n. . _ iettreta,,. ti p++ s� : r3 !t 71 1::: II�• II i13 • IG 15 Ill ' ! 20i21icc li 2d t,—--- ! i! %i 1 I I I I I . I - r 1 �'. 2 141'-'401 38 38 . 37 636 :r•"34 : .33-'42 . 31 , 30; 29 i i 27 _6 25T i o0 157 3! rr 3. 1 i i I ,.- , 38 / N. 3I �T ST. . 110.' .• .• 5c :23;�5 50 .. •5'-hi-512• 5c :5.2;. 5C i ' I .4, fl. :I rill, '. ); r S:,; ;5'1/.4 . 10 t'I I? i .r Ic !7 j. ;It i '_0 i 21 I 2_ i .3 I 12r __ 14L---1t—----I T~���L —� y ,7111sI� 3 SERV• j sr1;;PE 01 II CI I 4LC4; 1 b L.� .:c .' 3` •1'0l �� _. i .;3 3�7! 40 , :-•• I • 6 I tiSTA. Ic ='; h • v () I 1 I•• ✓" ; • •/ 1 SD RS tts Sc 50 :•I SC • I I I so W- •� l N. 30TH :y ST. N • -: ... SC 251 o SC .:5 75 SDEtc ••1 :1 1 o; SG W' 150 ' 50 I 5, 164.25 1 6425 I � . �^ ` 285 128.5 In • I.!�I'`'' :J-.. I4,,,,r, !c 1 17 I°� ° 12C, I ..'I .. .:4 3 IC '1L'_Oi1^.'� I , ,�,•+� ' 111 f^ 'r wor-T��.-i �i -..f-mil e Q I ; •_ 4; I G_^ I113J :.a 37�34 ' ::1-34 14J::`L!�1 ; ! 251 • Lb 1 L7 2b o 1 '^I ''.1 .�� ,arm . io,s. iiio i 0-4 \:.A /�I I N. 29TH ST. h i4 0 1 + 4I ! Op. , 1 •. 1 - I I •• . 50 35 75 50 1 I i 1 41 • i r i n I ! o� °!S* •r !00_L_ 157 —L___ 1 !2@.7 128.5 ;' I {` i I I�•El 1 .- . !Itv -- !301 !ZO •3e IL ""t33 I ..i i5 115 17 1 16 ° 12 Cr _, �4 C r 1 ! a of ., I N olln I� I � � I I I I I I ... ; ` a - � _ -I 11 - a- 1 ! -fi _ I K 241 m 4'F- 2-i 4i III 4G 3J 58 I ... '3E'! 35 134 3! 3121'I 30 12S ' 27 26V ._.._. . _ 99.....!- N i 150 i� T. fii ' 1� .. LEI • 1 • I I 125!25 .. 150 —78� --- -� r '°� 11 J•=:1--71 I ;• -" o1 iao YI 1 I. N. 28TH PL. . ,.�� o ` I C,!--- --_! 1 • 1,� c %119 1 N ! 1n 1 1 I 1 n I u Mr. &Mrs. Fred Jones Mr.Albert Miller Ms. Bertha Miller 408 Midway Avenue 3108 Park Avenue North 1307 North 32nd Street San Mateo, CA 94402 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Mr. Henry Hanks Mr. Timothy Shao Ms. Patricia Ecklund/Ms. Gay Lee 1409 North 32nd Street Ms. Shie-Lin Zong 1427 North 32nd Renton, WA 98056 12923 NE 29th Renton, WA 98056 Bellevue, WA 98005 Mr. Barry Oppie Mr. Jacob Deal Texaco Inc.-Tax Dept. Box 292 1415 North 32nd Street PO Box 7813 Ravensdale, WA 98051 Renton, WA 98055 Universal City, CA 91608 Mr. &Mrs. G. Sidebotham Southland Corporation Ski Investment 1404 North 30th 2711 North Haskell Avenue, Box 711 1302 North 30th Renton, WA 98055 Dallas, WA 75221 Renton, WA 98056 Brownie's Lawn Shop Quality Building Maintenance Mr. Wan Chee 1305 North 30th Street 408 Second Avenue W. 13028 NE 32nd Place Renton, WA 98056 Seattle, WA 98119 Bellevue, WA 98005 Chevron USA, Inc.-Property Mr. &Mrs. Paul Miller 575 Market Street 3623 Lincoln Avenue NE San Fi-ancisco, CA 98105 Renton, WA 98056 Ad'a.CevS 'Pl- pert1 O W vie v vvu.k4 sJe)ar s .S . 1 i , City . ..dnton Department of Planning/Building/P. Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET I . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: AireoA COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 28, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-041,ACU,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 9, 1997 APPLICANT: US WEST COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER HENNING PROJECT TITLE: US WEST 405 PCS SITE WORK ORDER NO: 78200 LOCATION: 1416 NORTH 30TH STREET SITE AREA: 550 SQUARE FEET I BUILDING AREA(gross): 550 SQ. FT. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a PCS wireless communication facility consisting of six(6)antennas installed on an 80 foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound offramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. The proposal includes a variance request to exceed the 30 foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC(R-8)zone. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air, Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HlstoriciCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet I 1 B.i POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS Antenna Mil be 83' above ground level of 227' above sea level . How can the site comply with FAA Part 77 regulations if the tower is 131 ' above the horizon- tal surface surrounding the airport? If, or when, the Texaco sign is removed, will this structure be removed, or will it become the highest manmade object in the area? C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS A notice of Proposed Construction should be submitted to the FAA for review of compliance with FAA Part 77 regulations prior to the issuance of a building permit. If' the tower/antenna structure requires lighting, USWest must be required to inspect and maintain all lighting, since City does not have equipment/personnel to do so. If painting is! reauired, USWest must•Jbeir-eauired to maintain the oaintina. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whey- •.;Nona!info fon is needed to properly assess this proposal. 1 .,0 ../`, �1 I7? Signat of Director or Authorized Representative Date i T DEVAP' 1.' Rev.10/83 42) iiii: :____:__ _________ an .0 _ _ ____ _ my __________ == ... ihis. mar I _______ _______- (,-:A,. , 77 0,,R. .1 :-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-.:--__:_:::_:__ 4.11- : "\-4 -_--_-t_--_--_--_---_-_--_--:_-_-:;e__- , ex -.47q ,. . , ,..././...._-./1*------•'a.'" __-:-:-=-7.-:-H-:-:-::::-:-:-:- ,mi /1 ,..., _________________________________„„ , .... ,e_::::::::::::::::::::::::::,,::::::::::::: itim i. I lit 51,1 4 s, .1 ..ii:c.g.:_.__.:7:::::E_EE:::E._.:.E_E::Eis:_.:E::_.:.z.E.2.7.2.::.:Ei.ii.sis_::__:_ ____________s . --1_:::-74-:-..SITE::-.:::::;337:::-::::::_::_::-_:::-7.:-.:__:1-111p1' __:::::::}-__=_E:1::::_-__:_-:::::::__:-__Eg-::__;EI,_:::__3:_.::_f___:::::_::-:_:_:__:::_--- -—m'.'... !Pk . , ---------------- :- J ink: 'a i 1" - 11,--1!Ikkk' ' A -_-_-_-_,..-4.-..., .....„_:_:_:_,:::_::::::::::::„E:::::::_:::_:::::::::::::_„_:_ ..„ __==`====_==_=====__===__==_==_==___=_=== G, .- � �' €r. . -, ge, ra !---1111111 ....:E_E_IEE_:_EF.3_7-2.E_E-E-E33.--_5.E2.7-.:---_-- / Atrapli. , . -i4rka,pv v \4\ ' --:-=-:-:-:-:-:-.---x-::::::::::::::-H-H-H-:::::::::::E.::::::-:-:-:-.7-x-f6s- .4,,......--„smill ki,M. „=iiiimii.z. „„r----- •t-. Ipt Ili 1).--:-.:-,,,,- :-::E_E_E:EIE-2,-EE:=6;:-1-::::E----::::::::-_fAE:::E:s_E:::_EE_EE_:_E_.-:::K7:EEEEE-EE-:_Ea7::3-:::52E3_:_i_EEE:7-;.:::3:.:3:74.:::::1 ir ad .7:P11ot i "72.47[ftiTlair I,,' ' . --',-,-:-:-:-:::::::::-'j'll-9--.4;'--:;-:.---:::-:;:.---:--.:;,:::::;::;::::.:::::.::::::;:-_-z-_-:-_- .-:::-:::::::::,_-; 1 imi, tke ipm ILVI,--71-3- 9 a ' /LE. \ yit"4,- ,,,4,1::::EEE3s.:-:---17:EEE-E3-ii:IEEEK:K=KEEE.:-EE_E:_11:::::::::::-.EEE:-E.:EsIEEEEEEEE.E.:_, , 4 I ;Alai. . .,,..p..,f4 .....[ ',DI 4t- ;:\,.,, . .":1EEE:EEEEEEEE::::":=E::SE::::::EKE:::E-tEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE igEE::::.E_Ei::::E_E_EF,; -V i 1.4.gi)iii, .41ril ibilif. -._::in um''T-2'im.11---r.`41.i......"11=Iliii; ,N-N,'' ""-:::::::::3::-:":::=3:ESS:-.:-E:::::E:E:Kat::;____:E:::.:E:E:::-:-__::: \ pli,Elpti, . 1 il,i. ,_, ..I w.c took 1. , 0 wi glom a i 1 ) \I . 4 VA*Pc-N- 04...-"":::::::::::--_:=1::K=K::::::::::::::::::::::::E:E:::.:K.:::.::-- - ,....._, . I, Evritt,,,.. ar I arc dooms ___ _=�.: \. --.1MfaieL;rr.1 I.I Q 111i —u.% ;. �i• I ®t.T „ . Ill1�i[ at-t ,1r11i 4A Lam! ©I�] 8 A, Ir, 1 ]]®® i t , ro., niatik---MI. ..._ i 1 NI. ‘ m NM @II (�" i*Li r kii I� _ j 1 . ,*Miti / �i. ."""f _-, a [,-,„,- ortil( ---. as II - 447`111( liati-Eld 7ibiql.!!"-- „:,,-- ./.,.4.,, ',-ag'‘) %'‘. Wri 'm :I A,,t,iii:.,r Ei...,111::, , It...ispip...„,,,,..IP Yil I iiggi ilirq..V!i:I:134 IlL !.1W 44.? •. Ir is F EJp ° � / tis `� �1' „•�• I� ,` 411.0,41 tomr �F, )! c=1?1'f WI iA I ri �esl :441: 4 st y . 7. � q O••11 r���► •� -� ,a I�� . • . W!'- - li R'.3'il liIR1f NI �'� ill' 1 i . "i\ �y� ' ) '-'4".41.1 elmtt� ALt!fi1E"irr • ao .MI �_. -. 4ii : r 1 4410 Iv........v..... .s; ,,placomi: v , \ N Cl:IS 49.. n-il P.. 11-4 .. %N"tilPilk VIC/414,!!V _ ,t,iffz--airt1111:1111 0 CA \*. -.-'. -)It R-• IC,' 1_ 4- i V Irsi ' \ \\\\ rt,2 % CO 1 4 an '11 •_. .. s ,. 1.45,i 4111 t31 a1 i 1 _ 9-e R." -• ._,_ - 43 ssw C7X o4 \ 'f ., ,.. ton Department of Planning/Building/P - Vorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 28, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-041,ACU,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 9, 1997 APPLICANT: US WEST COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER HENNING PROJECT TITLE: US WEST 405 PCS SITE WORK ORDER NO: 78200 LOCATION:. 1416 NORTH 30TH STREET SITE AREA: 550 SQUARE FEET I BUILDING AREA(gross): 550 SQ. FT. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a PCS wireless communication facility consisting of six(6)antennas installed on an 80 foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located at the base ofthe pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound offramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. The proposal includes a variance request to exceed the 30 foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC (R-8)zone. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Hlstorir/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet c�cX_wo B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS cr/L4_ � yY1�Gc�2% 1G C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS c l p /6 • /�/C We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. i-0 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Dat� DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City nton Department of Planning/Building/f Norks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: p,..`kC COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 28, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-041,ACU,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 9, 1997 APPLICANT: US WEST COMMUNICATIONS . PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER HENNING PROJECT TITLE: US WEST 405 PCS SITE WORK ORDER NO: 78200 LOCATION: 1416 NORTH 30TH STREET SITE AREA: 550 SQUARE FEET I BUILDING AREA(gross): 550 SQ. FT. 'SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a PCS wireless communication facility consisting of six(6)antennas installed on an 80 foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound offramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. The proposal includes a variance request to exceed the 30 foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC(R-8)zone. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable ' More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services r' Energy/ HistorfdCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet e 7)11 GAG/ be-el � • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a itional information is needed to props assess this proposal. c� Signatur of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City or Renton Department of Planning/Building/Pam_-_:Norks ENVIRONMENTAL. & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: //11 v\ COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 28, 1997 lA �vu+uatA Sept ceo APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-041,ACU,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 9,1997 • APPLICANT: US WEST COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER HENNING PROJECT TITLE: US WEST 405 PCS SITE WORK ORDER NO: 78200 —T Y OF REN ION LOCATION: 1416.NORTH 30TH STREET SITE AREA: 550 SQUARE FEET I BUILDING AREA(gross): .550 SQ. FT. ApR 0 9 1997 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a PCS wireless communication facility consisting of six(6)antennas installed on an 80 foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would ke 18c teg0 ad' c n ,tQ41 th;e southbound offramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. The proposal includes a variance request to exceed the30`fioot �Ttj i Residential-8 DU/AC(R-8)zone. • A.11 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ • Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • U 1L5 (ZkIPO �r ( 3TPL-) cluiRA , .fJC�1Ntlr6e61�-� L7RZ 1-4O '-notJ . ,4�`! f3A til4PUF4c1uicaio K.:3w1e B v 1 L-O 1 fJ C1 - GJ L= j 4-i Q B j S i/1- t v i` '-Li C_ 4 0 a2 I ) - - T R t 1=S We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /,oj 1 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/83 1140 M • CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: MAY 1, 1997 TO: JENNIFER HENNING FROM: NEIL WATTS Ng,W SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW US WEST PCS SITE- 1416 N 30TH ST I have reviewed the preapplication submittal for a 80 foot monopole to be located at 1416 N 30th Street. I suggest that we used the standards outlined in our draft wireless communications ordinance in reviewing this proposal. This includes limiting the height of this monopole to 60 feet for the subject R-8 zoning. Some of the applicablable submittal and review standards are listed below: SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS In addition to the information required for a building permit, the following items shall be required for a Wireless Communications application: A. A diagram or map depicting where within a three mile radius any portion of the proposed facility could be seen. B. Photosimulations of the proposed facility from affected residential properties and public rights-of-way at varying distances. C. A map showing the service area of the proposed WCF and an explanation of the need for that facility. D. A site/landscaping plan showing the specific placement of the WCF on the site; showing the location of existing structures, trees, and other significant site features to be retained; and indicating type and locations of existing and new plant materials used to screen WCF components and the proposed color(s) for the WCF. E. A signed notarized statement indicating: 1. The applicant agrees to allow for the potential co-location of additional WCF equipment by other providers on the applicant's structure or within the same site location; and 2. That the applicant agrees to remove the facility within 6 months after that site's use is discontinued. ' . MAY 1, 1997 PAGE 2 F. A draft lease agreement with the landholder that: 1. Allows the landholder to enter into leases with other providers; and 2. Specifies that if the provider fails to remove the facility upon 6 months of its discontinued use, the responsibility for removal falls upon the landholder. G. For support structures: A report including a description of the support structure with technical reasons for its design. H. For support structures: Documentation establishing the structural integrity for the support structure's proposed uses. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SUPPORT STRUCTURES: MONOPOLE I A. From Definitions Section: MONOPOLE I: A wireless communication facility which consists of a freestanding support structure, the height of which shall not exceed 60 feet, erected to support wireless communication antennas and connecting appurtenances. B. Monopole I Facilities may be allowed with a Administrative conditional use permit in the RC, R-1, R-5, R-8, R-10 and R-14 zones, provided that the site is over one acre in size, and the facility has minimum setbacks of 100 feet from any adjacent residentially zoned parcel. Monopole I Facilities may be allowed with a Hearing Examiner conditional use permit in the RC, R-1, R-5, R-8, R-10 and R-14 zones if the site is less than one acre in size, or has minimum setbacks of less than 100 feet from any adjacent residentially zoned property. C. Monopole I Facilities may be allowed with an Administrative conditional use permit in the MF, CN, CD, COR and CC zones if the facility has minimum setbacks of 100 feet from any adjacent residentially zoned parcel. Monopole I Facilities may be allowed with a Hearing Examiner conditional use permit in the MF, CN, CD, COR and CC zones if the minimum setbacks are less than 100 feet from any adjcent residentially zoned property. D. Monopole I Facilities are a primary permitted use in the CA, CO, IL, IM and IH zones if the facility has minimum setbacks of 100 feet from any adjacent residentially zoned parcel. Monopole I Facilities may be allowed with an administrative conditional use permit in the CA, CO, IL, IM and IH zones if the minimum setbacks are less than 100 feet from any adjacent residentially zoned property. E. The maximum permitted height for a Monopole I Facility shall be 60 feet. F. Antennas equal to or less than fifteen (15) feet in height or up to four (4) inches in diameter may be a component of a Monopole I Facility. Antennas which extend above the wireless communications support structure shall not be calculated as part of the height of the Monopole I wireless communications support structure. For example, the maximum height for a Monopole I shall be sixty (60) feet and maximum height of antennas which may be installed on the support structure could be fifteen (15) feet, making the maximum permitted height of the support structure and antennas seventy-five (75) feet (60 feet plus 15 feet). G. Macro facilities are the largest wireless communication facilities allowed on a Monopole I Facility. S. IRO MAY 1, 1997 PAGE 3 H. The shelter or cabinet used to house radio electronics equipment and the associated cabling connecting the equipment shelter or cabinet to the Monopole I facilities shall be concealed, camouflaged or placed underground. I. Monopole I Facilities shall be landscaped in conformance with City Code Section 4-31-34, Landscaping. A minimum landscaping area of fifteen (15) feet shall be required surrounding the facility. Landscaping shall include trees, shrubs and ground cover. The required landscaped areas shall include an irrigation system. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SUPPORT STRUCTURES: MONOPOLE II A. From Definitions Section: MONOPOLE II: A wireless communication facility which consists of a freestanding support structure, greater than 60 feet in height erected to support wireless communication antennas and connecting appurtenances. B. Monopole II Facilities are prohibited in the RC, R-1, R-5, R-8, R-10 and R-14 zones. ADDITIONAL PERMIT CRITERIA FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES The following criteria shall be met before a building permit can be granted: A. Visual Impact 1. Antennas may not extend more than fifteen (15) feet above their supporting structure, monopole, lattice tower, building or other structure. 2. Site location and development shall preserve the preexisting character of the surrounding buildings and land uses and the zone district to the extent consistent with the function of the communications equipment. Wireless communication towers shall be integrated through location and design to blend in with the existing characteristics of the site to the extent practical. Existing on-site vegetation shall be preserved or improved, and disturbance of the existing topography shall be minimized, unless such disturbance would result in less visual impact of the site to the surrounding area. 3. Accessory equipment facilities used to house wireless communications equipment should be located within buildings or placed underground when possible. When they cannot be located in buildings, equipment shelters or cabinets shall be fenced, screened and landscaped in conformance with City Code Section 4-31-34, Landscaping. Landscaping shall include a minimum fifteen (15) foot sight obsucuring landscape buffer around the accessory equipment facility. Accessory equipment facilities located on the roof of any building shall be enclosed so as to be shielded from view. 4. Accessory equipment facilities may not be enclosed with exposed metal surfaces. B. No equipment shall be operated so as to produce noise in levels above 45 dB as measured from the nearest property line on which the attached wireless communication facility is located. Operation of a back-up power generator in the event of power failure or the testing of a back-up generator between 8 a.m. and 9 p.m. are exempt from this standard. No testing of back-up power generators shall occur between the hours of 9 p.m. and 8 a.m. >I 90 S. MAY 1, 1997 PAGE 4 C. Security fencing, if used, shall be painted or coated with a nonreflective color. Fencing shall comply with the requirements listed in City Code 4-31-15(C), Fences and Hedges. D. Towers shall not be artificially lighted, unless required by the FAA or other applicable authority. If lighting is required, the governing authority may review the available lighting alternatives and approve the design that would cause the least disturbance to the surrounding views. Security lighting for the equipment shelters or cabinets and other on-the-ground ancillary equipment is also permitted, as long as it is appropriately down shielded to keep light within the boundaries of the site. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW CRITERIA A. The governing authority may grant, with or without conditions, or deny the requested conditional use permit. The governing authority may limit the term and duration of the conditional use permit. Conditions imposed by the governing authority shall reasonably assure that nuisance or hazard to life or property will not develop. B. The governing authority shall consider the following factors in determining whether to issue a conditional use permit, although the governing authority may waive or reduce the burden on the applicant of one or more of these.criteria if the governing authority, concludes that the goals of this ordinance are better served thereby. 1. Height of the proposed tower. 2. Proximity of the tower to residential structures and residential district boundaries. 3. Nature of uses on adjacent and nearby properties. 4. Surrounding topography. 5. Surrounding tree coverage and foliage. 6. Design of the tower, with particular reference to design characteristics that have the effect of reducing or eliminating visual obtrusiveness. 7. Proposed ingress and egress. 8. Potential noise, light and glare impacts. 9. Availability of suitable existing towers and other structures. AIRPORT RESTRICTIONS A. All wireless communications facilities and attached wireless communications facilities must comply with the Airport Zoning regulations, as listed in City Code 4-31-17. B. A Notice of Proposed Construction shall be submitted to the FAA and received back from the FAA prior to the issuance of any building permit for any wireless communications facilities or attached wireless communications facilities. OBSOLESCENCE Any wireless communications facility or attached wireless communications facility that is no longer needed and its use is discontinued shall be reported immediately by service provider to the Administrator. Discontinued facilities shall be decommisioned and removed by the facility owner within 6 months of the date it ceases to be operational or if the facility falls into disrepair, and the site restored to its pre-existing condition. • I. MAY 1, 1997 PAGE 5 CO-LOCATION A. Availability of Suitable Existing Towers or Other Structures: No new tower shall be permitted unless the applicant demonstrates to the reasonable satisfaction of the governing authority that no existing tower or structure can accommodate the applicant's proposed antenna. Evidence submitted to demonstrate that no existing tower or structure can accommodate the applicant's proposed antenna. Evidence submitted to demonstrate that no existing tower or structure can accommodate the applicant's proposed antenna may consist of any of the following: 1). No existing-towers or.structures are located within the geographic area required to meet applicant's engineering requirements. 2) Existing towers or structures are not of sufficient height to meet applicant's engineering requirements. 3) Existing towers or structures do not have sufficient structural strength to support applicant's proposed antenna and related equipment. 4) The applicant's proposed antenna would cause electromagnetic interference with the antenna on the existing towers or structures, or the antenna on the existing towers or structures would cause interference with the applicant's proposed antenna. 5) The fees, costs, or contractual provisions required by the owner in order to share an existing tower or structure or to adapt an existing tower or structure for sharing are unreasonable. Costs exceeding new tower development are presumed to be unreasonable. 6) The applicant demonstrates that there are other limiting factors that render existing towers and structures unsuitable. A. A permittee shall cooperate with other WCF providers in co-locating additional antennas on support structures and/or on existing buildings provided said proposed co-locators have received a building permit for such use at said site from the City. A permittee shall exercise good faith in co-locating with other providers and sharing the permitted site, provided such shared use does not give rise to a substantial technical level of impairment of the ability to provide the permitted use (i.e., a significant interference in broadcast or reception capabilities as opposed to a competitive conflict or financial burden). Such good faith shall include sharing technical information to evaluate the feasibility of co-location. In the event a dispute arises as to whether a permittee has exercised good faith in accommodating other users, the City may require a third party technical study at the expense of either or both the applicant and permittee. B. All applicants shall demonstrate reasonable efforts in developing a co-location alternative for their proposal. RADIO FREQUENCY STANDARDS A. The applicant shall comply with Federal standards for radio frequency emissions. Within six months after the issuance of its operational permit, the applicant shall submit a project implementation report which provides cumulative field measurements of radio frequency emissions of all antennas installed at the subject site and compares the results with established Federal standards. Said report shall be subject to review and approval of the Administrator for consistency with Federal standards. If on review, the City finds that the WCF does not meet Federal standards, the City may revoke or modify this permit. 4,10 MAY 1, 1997 PAGE 6 B. Interference must not exceed standards established by WWCIC. C. The applicant shall ensure that the WCF will not cause localized interference with the reception of area television or radio broadcasts. If on review the City fmds that the WCF interferes with such reception, and if such interference is not remedied within sixty (60) days, the city may revoke or modify this permit. PERMIT LIMITATIONS A. The permittee/operator of a WCF shall and does, upon approval of the building permit, agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the City, its Council members, officers, employees, agents and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorneys' fees (collectively, "liabilities") incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from: a) City's approval and issuance of this building permit; b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or non-discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein; and c) Applicant's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including, without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. Permittee/operator compliance with this section is an express condition of the building permit and this provision shall be binding on any and all of the permittee's/operator's successors and assigns. B. The applicant shall maintain the WCF to standards that may be imposed by the City at the time of the granting of a permit. Such maintenance shall include, but shall not be limited to, maintenance of the paint, structural integrity and landscaping. If the applicant fails to maintain the facility, the City may undertake the maintenance at the expense of the applicant or terminate the permit, at its sole option. C. The applicant shall notify the Department of all changes in ownership or operation of the facility within sixty (60) days of the change. The draft ordinance would prohibit monopole heights above 60 feet at this location. The applicant should be encouraged to reduce their structure to conform to this height restriction, or find an alternate location outside of the R-8 zone. If the applicant insists on pursuing this proposal at this location, then they must demonstrate why this additional height is,necessary, and that alternate sites are not a viable solution. Compliance with the other listed standards are recommended as part of the conditional use approval for the facility. The submittal information listed should be required to allow for full review of the facility for a conditional use approval. City or Kenton Department of Planning/Building/PL::..o Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:"TI,etto.svcAackt04, COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 28, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-041,ACU,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 9, 1997 APPLICANT: US WEST COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER HENNING PROJECT TITLE: US WEST 405 PCS SITE WORK ORDER NO: 78200 OP novr LOCATION: 1416 NORTH 30TH STREET SITE AREA: 550 SQUARE FEET I BUILDING AREA(gross): 550 SQ. F .' 0 9 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a PCS wireless communication facility consisting of six ruy ,ennas installed on an 80 foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would llop d adjacent to the southbound offramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. The proposal includes a variance request to exceed the 30 foot I 4 ii`jU nit of the Residential-8 DU/AC(R-8)zone. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth _ _ Housing Air Aesthetics Water - Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation • Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ • Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS Sfpa✓kft wte 140 . • -t vog-4-c wt i t,ytit/Oki -f-C. vet 'I C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS No t� eOW it 67 -f&i ✓c We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. NedGila 5/I/4 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 • City c - nton Department of Planning/Building/Pi •. :Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C`.M1 e(Wa..Sk COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 28, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-041,ACU,V,ECF . DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL.9, 1997, •rry APPLICANT: US WEST COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER HENNWENTPN PROJECT TITLE: US WEST 405 PCS SITE WORK ORDER NO:. 78200 LOCATION: 1416 NORTH 30TH STREET 1997 SITE AREA: 550 SQUARE FEET I BUILDING AREA(gross): 551:i°SCi-F'Gr 444110 y SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a PCS wireless communication facility consisting of six(6)antennas installed on an 80 foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound offramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. The proposal includes a variance request to exceed the 30 foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC(R-8)zone. A.I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More . Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LIghVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural • Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment • 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS S t.e S 1o1w4 Izt e M D. • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS I - lk.)o ektUivitig 5ek)(11 Pevwft-t5 v' fs v�f�ul✓c� We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. n)e'd tOC/ 5// 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 • �h,1Trtil FIRE DEPT. City 6. .:onton Department of Planning/Building/PL_ 1 Norks +�PI►RFAU ENVIR-ONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ` 1997 \3V� T�e�(t�� WQ�COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 28, 1��7 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-041,ACU,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 9; 1997A L APPLICANT: US WEST COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER HENNINGcrly or PROJECT TITLE: US WEST 405 PCS SITE WORK ORDER NO: 78200 • F3E6.- • LOCATION: 1416 NORTH 30TH STREET Aar • 97 SITE AREA: 550 SQUARE FEET I BUILDING AREA(gross): 550 SQ. FT. . SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a PCS wireless communication facility consisting of six(6)antdriffdis`'iffStl3'tted"drY Wed° foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound offramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. The proposal includes a variance request to exceed the 30 foot height limit of the Rsidential-8 DU/AC(R-8)zone. • • Al ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS - Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Llght/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet II • • • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • 5 5 era vZ wtza. • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 5 ce SfpkVr(XI. 1Mc-1,440. 010,11461 1110 (.4./AZA vcIufct/ee✓wu/I a)-f-u-' d-etrul1/t"q'. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Iva/72Q-- 61 A ? Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 P NTrynt FIRE DEPT City L..._nton Department of Planning/Building/Pi _.Works °1,n r h I ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVAIPEV' 9S, 6,ET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: RYA PVC COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 28, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-041,ACU,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 9, 1997 APPLICANT: US WEST COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER HENNING PROJECT TITLE: US WEST 405 PCS SITE WORK ORDER NO: 78200 LOCATION: 1416 NORTH 30TH STREET SITE AREA: 550 SQUARE FEET I BUILDING AREA(gross): 550 SQ. FT. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a PCS wireless communication facility consisting of six(6)antennas installed on an 80 foot tall support monopole, and two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound offramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. The proposal includes a variance request to exceed the 30 foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC(R-8)zone. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics • Water LighVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Hlstodc/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,0007 Feet vJ0 a,9 t an /PCA /00k B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS A)' C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where add nal information is needed t/;roperly assess this proposal. I � ,4 7 9 77 Signatur of Director or Authorized Repr sent ive Date DEVAP Rev.10/93 r7._ t$ CITE -OF RENTON - I Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator April 11, 1997 • Mr. Russ Stromberg , The Walter Group ,_ 1109 First Avenue South Seattle, WA 98101 SUBJECT: US West 1-405 PCS Site Project No. LUA-97-041,ACU,V,ECF Dear Mr. Stromberg: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on May 6, 1997. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application The date of Wednesday, May 28, 1997, at 7:30 PM, has been set for a public hearing to review the proposed variance. The hearing, before the City of Renton's Board of Adjustment will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend. Please contact me, at 277-6186, if you have any questions. fall Sincerely, kimAt.. ennifer oth Henning Project Manager cc: Mr. & Mrs. Keith Noess/Owners US West Communications-Wireless/Applicant ACCPTLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 C�7 This saner contains.(%recycled material 90%neat renal tmar • :CITYOF RENTOh>:?:`:s? <: ...--- < ' >' ::::.:„.„.....»>......>..............,:>»:::::>:::>::::::>::>....>::::<......„...•:•....:.::>.:.:.:: . V . PM NTSERVICES D V CAN :........ I.S..:..... (� S•U R�UND:INC:..�.P!R:O.P.ER OWNERS::: .th .. be'ct:$.I :>%#?::E:!:>'::<:><::: ::<::::::>::::� :::::::::: <: > ::<::<::: PROJECT NAME: USWEST Interstate 405 Exit 6 PCS Site - SEA041 . APPLICATION NO: cif " 041 T Cu A) EC G V The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ,ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL • NUMBER • 334210-3215-04 ; 334210-3216-03 JONES FRED ALAN C CARMEN D 703534 MILLER ALBERT V 082629 408 MIDWAY AVE 3108 PARK AVE N • SAN MATEO CA 94402 RENTON WA 98056 334210-3217-02 334210-3218-01 MILLER BERTHA 913037 MILLER BERTHA 251753 1307 N 32ND ST 1307 N 32ND ST RENEW! WA 99055 RENTON WA • 98056 • ' 334210-3220-07 334210-3221-06 ,HANKS"TIENRY. L 01273 SHAO TIMOTHY C+PAO-CHIN JAN039999 `•1,409,`,T,!G;320';ST ZONG,SHIE-LIN+YUE-HWA 4RGNiOM„NA7fi,^';;f. 98056 12923 NE 29TH y-- 'm �' BELLEVUE WA • 98005 : , C 33421.053722,05; d\ 334210-3225-02 EKL°UND`.P'A'TRIETA G+LEE GAY A630323 OPPIE BARRY L 843327 1427 N 32M ' � - ; BOX 292 RENPT1?I W'A 3 98055 RAVENSDALE WA 98051 • 334210-3230-051 : 334210-3236-09 DEAL JACOB Ii,• 539800 STATE OF WASHINGTON 667777 1445,N,.32ND-ST DEPT OF WHYS RENTON' WA 9E055 • 334210-3237-08• 334210-3245-08 TEXACO INC - TAX DEPT 142326 SIDEBOTHAM G A • • P 0 BOX 7913 1404 N 30TH • UNIVERSAL CITY CA 91608 RENTON WA 9R055 334210-3245-81 334210-3248-05 • SIOEBOIHAH G H 809800 SOUTHLAND CORP 329999 1404 M 30TH 2711 N HASKELL AVE BOX 711 . RENTON WA 98055 DALLAS WA 75221 • 334210-3250-00 334210-3251-09 P9k JONES FRED ALAN+CARMEN D. . 703534 SKI INVESTMENT 631723 i Nip 408 MIDWAY AVE 1302 N 30TH py Nip 408 SN:1014AJTEO;CA 94402 RENTON WA 98056 9 ;. ,t N� f. ��'P A U J''' C�Oio '�i9 334210.�325,7:6 334210-3260-08 �ry h)�, ,' ' BRONNIE&'S2 LAIQNS}OP 240411 QUALITY BUILDING MAINTENANC551616 O,C.iy1,A • 130.5 . I 3OTH S? .408 2NU AVE W '9�y t�� R FAT kON NAB o _ 98056 SEATTLE WA 98119 "V �a i TAM /��' 33421&--3-2'7C^O6",''�: 334210-3271-05 CIIEE•(IN-? ,,t`1AHMY M 059999 CHEVRON USA INC-PROPERTY TA589999 ' 13029 NE: 32140- T'L 575 MARKET ST 8I-LLEVUE N,I)•, •''' 98005 SAN FRANCISCO CA 98105 • • 334210-3272-04 334210-3276-00 MILLER PAUL C PAM 510272 STATE OF WASHINGTON 667777 • 3623 LINCOLN AVE NE RENTON WA 96056 . • (Continued) • NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER I I • 1 Applicant !Certification I, (U S p j" , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) , owners and their addresses were obtained from: ' • ❑ City of Renton Technical Services Records ❑ Title Company Records ing Cou y Asse'ssors Records Signed Date �`� C..;/ �•,,'',' v;y. ,7 . I (Applicant) 4,'* ''W'' R� NOTARY ' = " v • ATTESTED: ubscribed and sworn before me, a N tary Public, /nd for Stz�t• 4c . as ington, resid' t,� frA.Pb • on the 7 day of �," ' " CA'3 ''r.1 A , 1,97T T. I Signed ,,,L (4.) •�'.`; ( ry Public) /(A14 6/C/9// ,1 ;.;::.}>}xv::}}}:.}}}i::}:`:::::5:::::::}::::i:k>.:;::::%:`:::;;`:?::•:::�;i:k::k::::�r::::::2+`•.;:.;•:;}•:.;''~::kk::::;;:•:`1;•::::;:;kk:':?" ::;•iS::::kk:>:k::;;:':`:•::i:k::�l•.A�. ... >: :� � :::Renton U .}iRkti;:?;;::}S::'.}:�::iii:v'i:::i::iikii 'i�:::'?::i:ii::?;`::.{:;:,:;:r:•::f�?:}i>.;i•'.':}::•1::.}i}}>:^}}:........:.......:....:::..:..}...: : : .:...:.. .i::::::i:::}i::''i:}}}iii}} :isi4}}}}}ihi}}}}}}r.}} C::}i?} }}%:{n}} ::i}::i:i::i':':::i ............:....:............:::.::: :::::::::::.::.:.................:..:....::.:CE.RT..,fFIC!gTI.�.N.......F.M....I.....I�.G::.:::::.:::::.�:::.: ..:...................................:::::::::.�::.�.:.. eb..:: : t ;>: a <:n )'es:::o�•>the::• .�o .�:$e:d..�.....lcafi:Qi.......::::�:::::::a.:::::::tQ::.:::::.�::::. �'�.>:<>.: •:� ':'� .•����':;:��:;<.;'.:::::.;:...::...::...e)'...... ..cert..f.Y:th. x::...PS:G.::..:................P.. ...P.................PP.:.�:::.: ::�::.�:.....................................�::::::::. ...::::::.::::::. e. ed::: ra ert. <:::o:vYn.er:>on:•>:>«<::' ................ Signed ...i: , ..:: ::i*: . v.:::::::::::::::.::...::::::::w:n..•:.:v.�:.:::...:::::.�::::::::.::�::...::•,i4:•}:v}}:•:4:isiy}:?r:•:•}}:^}}}}:v}}':.}}i:}•.�::ry}:•::.�:{::.:}:.:•.�:.�.}'•}::::::•.�::.}•.:}}•p'::::v:::::.;•.}• : ki: i:vkii}iiiii :viii ; ; ::4{ `}'ii:k: :>iiiii?i:::::::::•'.:•,:::::i}i'riiY•ii:}::ik:>iiii'kk{}:'ii:v:kLk:ii' jii:::�::::i;•'.:>iiii:k4}i}}i:>:iiii::iij::: 1 .(.................:.... .. ............ ...............................:::,::::::::::::::w::::::::::::.:::.�:}::v}}:•i}}:}:•}:vi:;}:•Y,.jjiiii:v}i::}iij?i:::::k�iir:.::iii::?:{:iiii:i::i}ii::3:.::�•,�... ..::}....... .................. ... . ':}T`};;v:i•:.:i4+j$j}:k:i'rikv ii'r :• ••}!vv}:• .}}:• ::.}}:::• :•}'i^:•}:J:4i?w• ::::•:... ..............•• ::::: :.:::::.::: <.:::. ..:::-:<:> } f . ::: :: : .. . a, ::.Pu6T.(6. .o: . .. :fpr•.•:.hewStiat: :<of:; ' :s " :toi > liii . . :.:ES:..::: .scrl.b.�d:. nd.swore)::be;;Qf..�.: :p,.:�.;�.q..t:rY:::::.....:.....,.�.:�.:::::.�.::::: .�...�:. . .:.:.�.: :. .:::.�::.::�.:�::.�.: rostdi }:at::{. ;:' •::.::.. ::.. . . . ....�::::.::•:dn..ahe.: . .t. }..,...,��1.' 1 1 � 1 r .::::::.}:.>:.>}:.}:.} i::k:y::::k't:::i i::k:S::::;:::k::k:;S<'• :::: /;:•:. •.�.:ti'fi'C::'�'r?i`iirrii:`v'::�:i$i>iiiiiiii w: .......... �¢..�::... ........I :..n ... ... ..:.;...:::::. : ::. : ::::::.:::::::}:itri}}:^:•.;;}:•}i:•y}:?4.<:J.:n�C•};(p;{::•?Y....h...n.......................•:;•. �.. f:k:Y.Y?::::?;::}`.ki:'ri::i<is•`.:::tiii:j;i:::ii:#:{yS:::;%i: Signed... . >� ��•`�.., .':> ..................................................................... listprop.doc MA (2ET 1, fjfiL j�/ ,.r REV 07195 /d. i'i — Q!Pes 6/q/%0 2 II NOTICE OF PROPOSED'cNVIRONMENTAL APPLICA1 -IN AND PUBLIC HEARING RENTON, WASHINGTON An Environmental Review Checklist (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: US WEST 1-405 PCS SITE/LUA-97-041,ACU,V,ECF DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a Personal Communication Systems (PCS) wireless communication facility consisting of an 80-foot tall support monopole with six (6) antenna and two (2) equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. Proposal includes a variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC (R-8) Zone by 50 feet. GENERAL LOCATION: 1416 North 30th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review(ECF) Administrative Conditional Use (ACU) Variance (V) The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) meeting date, Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative decision. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. The date of Wednesday, May 28, 1997, at 7:30 PM, has been set for a public hearing to review the proposed Variance (V). The hearing, before the City of Renton's Board of Adjustment will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend. A !I_6:,., r. '*'— p :. ,I ' `ems - . _ ....- _. _ . .. =-6' I 1 . o\ " . q'1= I Q I? - 66 f L K^ U , - 4J -is 'i i.i D•= sl a 6 N. 33RD PL. - 2 o+� `ce, q.J.'� 20 'Sv 62.0,•.So,0�20N-)'�'�•w ~ljr i s 0 z-4q p P t Fitt E , j - .:,. .- w... > ,. --- ._x. I II � d iS: t . ,1 rW LI I,. ,•dv ._ES- BI B ��._32 g l:r�\ ,, c, a" ,r63i a. N. 33RD •:. o :, ,..: .,• 62 \ IN I _j I 000'':'' . i H I14.-0v_I�,N'� ,:04.1 _' saiik.ON• - o;_. _7==`.7=cssc_ $- =S.ct��.7..-r - - N. 32ND' ST. . i _i >. - w ' ! QQ E26#9Ame kgo iEd$T2 I'D1`Jas1A ra I, I' ?<, 35 .I�. N. 31ST ST. 38PP` i, 1 58 57 �� CSfp,. p d, .C1, ❑r� G� .d .. j � :I 59 ...11: 0 °El' 0G'C ] 0 0; icy 4 -• fn Q ; i _ I w ST. .,,, _ _iio ,Eaar in adDa ,e] If] DA - -- �y - i eel , oad �J 0 5(1.5I N k_6_ '� N. 25TH Sr. :a0 - 41 - 42 1 :•6'�� f _1! O° o C7}.DD . l opq .. . . . i 1.1 I I . '.. • •d• L]0 - p '© �A.a' a 3 - .I''' 'Cam]4 � II I " =48 1 1 4. CQ;; ` ' ; —�1 N. 28TH +PL. .. �' '-�'-. .-. 2r• ] I,,I,`; - GENMALOT.DOC —i + ` ;;; '. ._a" 3P •_ °:,P, 9 ]t]0 _P f- —F. --'"'�'--.-:�s.tuar«n".1..--NEa—28TH-11-rST • . , . • . ., - . . . . . . . r4oflcE' eE . PENDING APPLICATION AND PUBLIC HEARING • PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: US WEST Id05 PCS SITE!LUA-97-041,ACU,V,ECF . DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a Personal Communication Systems(PCS)wireless communication fatillty consisting of an 80-foot tall support monopole with six(6)antennas and two(2)equipment cabinets located at the• base of the pole.The facility would be located adjacent to the southbourdd off-ramp of Interstate 405,Exit 6. Proposal Includes a variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC(R-8)Zone by 50 feet. I . GENERAL LOCATION: 1416 NORTH 30TH STREET PUBLIC APPROVALS: r Building Permit _Preliminary Plat _Short Plat . • XXXX Conditionzl Use Permit- _Rezone _Site Plan Approval ' Administrative - XXXX Environmental Review —P Shoreline Conditional Use. XXXX VARIANCE ermit _Fill 8 Grade Permit _Shoreline Substantial _Other Development Permit • . The.application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hail. ' Comments will be accepted any time prior to Environmental Review Committee(ERC)meetings,Public Hearings.during Public Hearings,or prior to an administrative decision. Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received I within thirty(30)days from the last date of applicant's'Notice of Application"publication in the South County Journal. For further information on the application,or it you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional , notifications,please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. PUBLIC HEARING: The date of Wednesday;May 28,1997,at 7:30 PM,has been setter a public hearing to review the proposed ' Variance WI. The hearing,before the City of Renton's Board of Adjustment will be held In the Council Chambers on the second Root of City Hall,Renton,Washington. The applicant or-represantative(s)of the , applicant is required to be present at the public hearing.Interested parties are Invited to attend. 'x%�`17 D'C_O'I 0Oi21£i L;., rigq�Ir— _7e:[.+1e k v O �. •J it • — —car,, .. • c- I J�Q',p° - •r, • JI. z•�arlu.I=rc_' r urn;- °�-�.,..— ,U1. '-e 1'( a It r .: till. • i Wf/ J I.n_al b' oo°p.-� D e add, :gip 11 • c. t,Ili; 6 b : ' :. 9 i�',; �/1 IN • _In'l 'd.c b.p HI• �'t)MbuN4S�rt.,66/I.268 SB1NGT,Of tiJ'• •. ./' 5;1 :. ri Rop�o ooi,'oo7 I V r� 0 ,a , — ..- rA BIB .N'0=_E9&Nr�.D141510N Na.Il ' \ 1 - .t,-,• i L tile_ m:t_..a .0 i • - '---- La-.cr..cL oo�;-clog,121—,0 - - ': r i ,\ti,; IFTi_c=.cu-- -''-=��)8"E*', .`).:c'�G I�Pp� ,pylc c 'nec 7 "7 D 6_1 u _Ili PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION. ' CERTIFICATION • I, . SGt/11 Iq,(iILSO'Yt . a hereby certify that 3 copies-of the above document were.posted"by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described.property on . • -/kpr 1 119 l q 11 Signed: Safi 2L 9a,Cav .' • ' STATE OF WASHINGTON ) �O/ ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 6/frJ)y ._14-G- se signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and volunt,�rysihc�'t'rfor•the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. . 41 Dated: - u )1 9 _• r' ' a n�, . / NotaryPub in and f r e S't t4a VV�as4Th tOn Notary (Print) MA-/6-4-f nr.' c LLZ1: — My appointment expires: 6 j14) NOTARY.00C N01-1(:)E PENDING APPLICATION AND PUBLIC HEARING PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: US WEST 1-405 PCS SITE/LUA-97-041,ACU,V,ECF DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a Personal Communication Systems(PCS)wireless communication facility consisting of an 80-foot tall support monopole with six(6)antennasland two(2)equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. The facility would be located adjacent to the southbound off-ramp of Interstate 405, Exit 6. Proposal includes a variance request to exceed the 30-foot height limit of the Residential-8 DU/AC(R-8)Zone by 50 feet. GENERAL LOCATION: 1416 NORTH 30TH STREET PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit Preliminary Plat Short Plat XXXX Conditionzl Use Permit - Rezone Site Plan Approval Administrative XXXX Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Use XXXX VARIANCE Permit Fill&Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial Other Development Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any time prior to Environmental Review Committee(ERC)meetings,Public Hearings,during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative decision. Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty (30)days from the last date of applicant's"Notice of Application" publication in the South County Joumal. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications,please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. PUBLIC HEARING: The date of Wednesday, May 28, 1997, at 7:30 PM, has been set for a public hearing to review the proposed Variance (V). The hearing, before the City of Renton's Board of Adjustment will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend. •-� r'r t '' c 1 N 36TH ST. ' ' 36TH ST II/.�IP.173i P 1:1bIG7 216 Gvl"-]'b q08 I' •,la6) • I ;' • ' 69� I " N. 36TH ST• • ! . I _ 6Ais a`-ace _ - _ 23&' IK II / 1. • N -- ' , '.n6 66 I N 34TN ST. 111 :-Cl: Pii] OP 6 r_s': d..4 G1 I' '" 11r3 N 33RC PL. I 2t�}: '14 1 0 _ 'J" O a E3 C'10 t t �1 _ i5 ,a �, W J �y �J' `� A I �3 Iii El e32'•1 3: �'� N 3390 ST. ` J y, f. J ��'d.oD0HILri,M N8. til8 InSLINGTON'Put- / .. 0 ___at.c_16__ _m-_=c- rz--- N. 32ND ST, Q I N 32ND ST. {{--,,��i 4 • `nl _J14 pp©erAegEmp, .P5-vbt�p1 ,.L, IDI s1(7N N1.I I. \\\�\ .1`. 34 60` 14_c)� O� f'a lil 1'7 6' r�❑ wU 1 36 0 1 SB 57 —1 N 313T ST. ' N 30TH ST. _ •.1 301N,$73 - lio . aQO rw(JP r} w Pei ] ao❑ oa C.b - :t i Et, .,►ran n Mc49=- ! N. 2.TH Sr. 'GO 1 41 - 42 ( 'I -- ,&33 ,Qaa ch t`4''0_ T; ae _H D¢p.5]o .�.,6Ooe III 'if'a, .R, - . © ! •` .:. i N .2 TH PL. • � u, •, `• .. 1 � •n0 O.(341d.00o PI. �L] H so ._:R=.��.-. .-.:.r._:.t.1-__N-•-'-26TH-•�:gT,._. \1 —.,•,`we na eF ETTLE --1 ' PLEASE INCLUDE'.:THE!PROJECT•NUMBER WHEN;CALLING FOR PROPER FILE:IDENTIFICATION g iiA THE WALTER GROUP r CITYo F ae�vroN IIq�QOM R E C h V MAR 31 1997 BUILDING DIVISION 1109 First Ave. ,� y Suite 205 March 31, 1997 Seattle,WA 98101 Jennifer Toth Henning (206)467 8704 Senior Planner Fax(206)467 7108 Development Services City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Ave.S.,3rd Floor Renton,WA 98055 RE: LUA97-041 USWEST Communications-Wireless Interstate-405 Exit 6 PCS Site- SEA041 Dear Jennifer, As we discussed last Friday when I submitted LUA97-041 (CUP and Variance for a medium utility),I needed to submit drawings or photographs proposing landscaping. Today,I am submitting eleven site plans with landscaping shown. USWEST is proposing to have a wood slatted wire woven fence around the facility and evergreen bushes to the north and south with a few to the east. This will satisfy the submittal requirements described last Friday. USWEST understands that a site visit will take place during the process. At that time, modification to USWEST's landscape proposal may be required. If you have any question,please contact me at 224-8306. Thank you for your consideration. in ely, Russ Stromberg A-4.1.-111L1 Senior Associate • ::: . A.. .. ........... ... ......... ...... ........ ..... . .. P:ROJECT:€:I.N :ORMA.. .ON.................................. "itiona..��'ach'an>addit No.tea ,rpo,r,�;thenoneJegal;.:o:vvnePs;piease'at,t.,....: riot �ized::Master:App(i catgiOgr e ach aii :i ;. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: Keith and Luella Noess USWEST Interstate 405 Exit 6 PCS Site - • SEA041 PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 21210 4th Place South 1416 N. 30th, Renton SE corner of ert ro p p y, north of Texaco adjacent to west side of I-405 : KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): ' CITY: • Seattle ZIP: 98198 .. .334210-3240-03 • • TELEPHONE NUMBER: 206-824-4682 EXISTING LAND USE(S): Multifamily PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: USWEST Communications-Wireless Wireless Communication Facility COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: \\ Medium utility. [sames as above] ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): 1249 NE 145th , #105 • CITY: Seattle ZIP: 98155 EXISTING ZONING: • R8 • • TELEPHONE NUMBER: 345-1551 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): • SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: Russ Stromberg Approximately 550 : dfa COMPANY.(if•app)icabie2:,,,`,f�r ': PROJECT VALUE: 1997 $81,355 • 7.171(le Walt r Group ')EVELopmeto. NIVIN N of RENTON ADDRESS: ` - IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? ='11f09';,First Ave.' S. No. • • CITY: ZIP. Seattle 98101 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY • • SENSITIVE AREA? None known. TELEPHONE NUMBER: 206-224-8306; General#467-8704 ........ .. ........ —�z�.................:.::.:::::::::::::::.:•i;:{•i:O:3iii:h;;•i:y;n•i'•ii�:'fj•i!•iv4i'•�:::.ii::•::Y �`:i+::�>�:>:::::;ji: :::;ti:::::�::::''r,:?Y,:v:!}'::ii::;:::::;::i:iji:<:::+•j}'Yi::�`:'•�. • isi::�:::::•:•:•:: ::•: ::: :::::}:;:::•::::: }:�.:.isisi:•:•:':.:Lr•±n};:V:v:•;•:6:•:•::i:•:::::•+::.::;: : :::.:n•.�•.::...:::...:...:... . :. :' :.i ::: .:::::;:?•:;::::: :::i:..,� •..:'.::;.••.�::: ��....:. :..... .: ..........:.:.:......:: . ; ::: •. F :::: T: ;:;;.: ., :>: <::n e.c e s s a r::.. €>:»><::€:>€:iii i::>::»:>:,,,: :;:;;.:.::.;:•; :.;:.:. .;::.;;;.::.:.: . :;.; '. .. ,, .:. '. ,i:;. ::.. OP.ERT:Y<.:(./.���ac�. se :ar:� sheet;:>f:.i :::::: ::.:i.<.:::.::.Y.�..............:..:............. .._ :r-EGALC�ES�RIP� ...N.....>:�F.;:PR::::;:.>':::::.:.::::::.�..�;•...�...�........,........ .1�,,......= 1 :.> :;.i:.i::.::.>i:.i:;.ii:.;::. ::.;::.:iii:.:::.:.i;:.i:.i.;.i;:.:�:.;:.;:>>::�.::.::.i:;.:i;::.::.:::.:::::.;:.�:.:::.::::.ii:.::.:;>;:.:::.::�:.i. .;i: ii:.::.:iiii:.:::<:.»:;;::.>;:::.::. :.>:.;::<.;;;:.>;::.;:><:<:>::.>::»>::>:<.;::;;.;:.;:;'. ::.;�:.::.: ...;:... ;;......... .:. .. :::> ..n �� (Ilde..terrain.e:.. .a .............:.:::::::............ :.::::.;:.::<.;:.;:.;:i:.::.::::::::::::.ii:::.ii>;:.:.:. ;: s::.: ha <:>a �: ::.i::;Ll�. ;:Staff<::.w.. ::.::.::...: :::.�:...:::...:.:::.::.::..:.::::.::........... . ...... : :.Ch eck::a I f:a P.RI cati o:r��<tY Re ;:� � ,P p .Y..:.:.:::.....Y...:::. . ::. .....:.. . ....... .. _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ � _ SPECIAL PERMIT' $ _ SHORT PLAT $ TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _ - TENTATIVE PLAT $ X CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT • $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ _ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ • ! (NO. CU._YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ • x VARIANCE • `�yy $ -1 (FROM SECTION -�C,i% ) _ PRELIMINARY . • _WAIVER ikei -r tr.)tjtjzz�\\ $ 1 _ FINAL • _ WETLAND PERMIT $ _ ROUTINE VEGETATION ! MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT ' $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $. 1 , SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ ' _ EXEMPTION $No Charge ' g ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION $ ! I, (Print Name) Russ StYom-hPrpp',� , declare that I am(please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application,X the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. AT EST: Subscripgd an sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in : d Russ S'tromber , The Walter Group • ' for he State of Vii- residing at on theo27� day of (Jame of Owner presentativ 19 , ``•��d (Signature of Owner/Representative) �' ;/ ,, .�Ii G 4t'�y . . (Si•� re,[� Note y bli ) ` Lt.-pc; ........................................................................:........................:.........................::.. �/� :::::::::;;::ii:::::t';::i2:2:E �;:::: :�;:: ';:i::::;::: ��'::? : >' : ;:"''>; %;:i:'` :'�:?: ': :`::'� :::' ` E ;i: ; ; : :;;•:::;:::;:;;i:::::�:_ ':�.'::: S.;Y:.,....�:R!'.............. .........::......:.... .:::::..... :::::::::::::::.........:.:::::::.:::::.........:.:::.:::::::::::......::.::::::::::::. a ..: ..be:.c.o.m I.eted::..: :::..:.:.Y..::.::::.�::.::::.........:.:::::.:::::::::�,.:......:::..:.::::.:.::.::....... :::::::::::........::.:: ...............:::::::::::..............::::::::::::.:...............:.:::..:..............(.T,hls...s. ctlon.tn:.:.................p.::.�::::.:...........:::::::::.................::.:::. .:. ..... , ...:.. . .:... :.::.: .............�.:: ...... :::...:......::.�:::. .. .ile:.Number...:.::.:.:.:...:::::...... ::;.::.i:.;;::«:>::::;:::::::;:.::.i::.ii:.;::<::::::>::::::::;;:.;:.ii:. ::::<:::::::::<::::: .... ......F..P..UD ...S.M......SM: :. MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 9/96 4 DIY • EXHIBIT A The west 69 feet of the north 172 . 75 feet of Tract 37 and the east . 100 feet of the north 172 . 75 feet of Tract 38 , all in Hillman' s Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition to Seattle No. 1, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 63 , in King County, Washington; TOGETHER' WITH easement 10 feet in width for installation and maintenance of sewer line under the westerly 10 feet of the east 100 feet -of the south 130 feet of Tract 38 , Hillman' s Lake, Washington Garden of Eden Addition to Seattle No. 1, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 63 , in =.King'. County, Washington; • TOGETHER WITH easement 20 feet in width, for ingress and egress to and from said .premises, over and across that portion of Tract 37, Hillman ' s Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition to Seattle No . 1, according to the plat' thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 63 , in King County, Washington, describea' as commencing at the southwest corner of said Tract 37 ; thence north 89°2 ' 0" east along the south line of said Tract 37 .a distance of 9 feet. to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence north 8°30 ' 30"east 131 . 78 feet to the north line of the south 130 feet of Tract 37; thence north .89°2 ' 00" east 20 feet; • thence south 8°30 ' 30" west 131 . 78 feet to said south line of Tract 37 ; thence south 89°2 ' 00" wept along said south line 20 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. , AKA: 1416 N 30th' Renton, WA 98056 Fran : NORMANDY TRAVEL PHONE No. : 206 241 5034 , Mar. 19 1997 11:11AM P02 "e054677105 WALTER QRQUP INC F-095 T-969 P—O02/002 MAR 19 '97 1S t 05 March 1a, 1997 'lb Whom it May Concern: We,Keith and Luella blows,Husband and Wife,are the owners of the property located at 1416 North 30th Street in the City of Renton. Tho tax parcel number of this property is 334210-3240. This Icttct authorizes VSWIIS'P Communications-Witless and its agents to submit for all pert:oho required by the City of Renton to construct a wirclear communication facility on this property. .A<//44) 27(kC-4-4"—' Keith Noose Luella Now gat 3//9//f 9 7 ._... . . /'9�i 9iZ_. -- e THE WALTER GROUP PROJECT NARRATIVE PROJECT NAME:USWEST Interstate 405 Exit 6 PCS SITE -SEA041 OVERVIEW USWEST proposes to locate a wireless communication facility along Interstate 405 at the far east side of the Kennydale Apartment's parking lot,north of the tall Texaco sign. PROPOSED FACILITY USWEST proposes to install six wireless communication antennas on an eighty foot pole with two equipment cabinets located at the base of the pole. This facility will be located at 1416 N. 30th Street in the City of Renton. This location is ajacent to the southbound offramp of Interstate 405 Exit 6. Each antenna is approximately 42 inches long, five inches wide and four inches deep. Three additional growth antennas may be placed lower on the pole at a later date if needed to meet demand. Each equipment cabinet is approximately 5 feet tall and 30 inches square at the base. They are placed on a 9' foot by 12 foot concrete pad. An additional cabinet may be placed on the pad at a later date to accommodate growth. The cabinets will be placed slightly into a berm. Consequently, they will be partialy hidden from public view by the ground and screened by a woven wire fence. Accessory devices include a geostationary positioning system antenna(a few inches in length), a lightning rod and parking bollards. Power and telephone will be routed to the facility. The buildings drainage system will not be changed or affected. This facility is unattended. USWEST expects the maintenance visits to the site to be no more than once a month, as little as once a quarter. Due to the infrequent visits, no additional parking will be added. Currently, the property includes approximately number of spaces unknown. Parking bollards will protect the proposed facility from traffic. CURRENT USE OF SITE An apartment building exists to the west of the proposed facility. s,;' r , E 197 SPECIAL SITE FEATURES D •VL LO '�rV7 None. 17Y OF �tv+.ti ;.ac: NUMBER AND LOCATION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES AND/OR RESIDENTIAL UNITS (EXISTING AND POTENTIAL) WHICH MIGHT HAVE VIEWS OBSTRUCTED AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT This project will not obstruct any views. To the north and south of the facility are two separate cluster of evergreen trees. The facility is located southeast of the existing two story apartment building. Trees which bordering the building obscure the line of sight between the building and the facility. Additional trees on the west half of the property obscure views of the structures from properties to the west. Furthermore, the subject property is at a higher elevation than surrounding properties. To the east is Interstate 405. The Southbound Exit 6 offramp runs immediately east of the facility. To the south, beyond the trees, is a Texaco Station. There is a 108 foot tall Texaco sign at that site, due south of the proposed facility. Interstate 405 lies at a lower elevation than the subject property and is lined with trees on both sides. Given the subject properties elevation relative to surrounding properties, the trees between the facility and other properties and the nature of the surrounding uses, no views will be obstructed as a result of this project. suss Stromderg, Zoning and Land"Use Associate 'The Wafter Group,467-8704;224-8306 W A L 'r E 12 G I2 () U v APPLICANT'S JUSTIFICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PROJECT NAME: USWEST Interstate 405 Exit 6 PCS Site-SEA041 REQUEST The applicant, USWEST Communications-Wireless, requests a conditional use permit to install a wireless communication facility, consisting primarily of a 80 foot pole, panel antennas and equipment at 1416 N. 30th Street. This use, defined as a medium utility, will provide communication services t`aEr"; 5811 Renton and Interstate 405. JUSTIFICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE MAR ° ° I 997 A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DEVELOPMENT PLt11VNINti USWEST's proposal is compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards or-[Ne comprehensive plan and the ordinances of the City of Renton. Policy U-100 Require that the siting and location of telecommunications facilities be accomplished in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on the environment and adjacent land uses. Topography greatly affects the siting of wireless communication facilities to a greater degree than mapped land use designations. This facility is a medium utility. Within the City of Renton, the Comprehensive Plan does not specify an area for medium utilities or any other utility. The facility is located next to Interstate 405 in an R8 zone. To the south is a CC zoned property and R8 lies north and west.This facility is located the farthest possible distance from the adjacent R8 zones. .It is in the southeast corner of the subject property,closest to the freeway and the Texaco station. This site meets the height, yards and screening requirements of the zoning ordinance. Further, it complies with FAA Part 77 regulations regarding safety of aircraft and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft. Trees surrond screen a substantial portion of the facility from public view. Therefore, the site is able to meet the network design demands while minimizing adverse impacts on the environment and adjacent land uses. Policy U-101 Require that cellular communication structures and towers be sensitively sited and designed to diminish aesthetic impacts, and be collocated on existing structures and towers wherever possible and practical. This facility is located next to the freeway on-ramp and a Texaco gas station. Directly south is a 108 foot Texaco sign. The pole at this facility is 80 feet tall. The pole is screend by existing trees.Further, no views cross the subject property due to its higher elevation. The pole itself has a small visual footprint. In particular, the antenna arrangement is close to the pole and consists of small antennas. USWEST purchased the smallest antennas which can meet coverage requirements. These compact antennas are 50% more expensive than any other antenna being produced today. This design effort reduces the impact the facility has on its surroundings. USWEST considered other properties and collocation opportunities before selecting the current site. Texaco was contacted in an effort to attach the antennas to its tower, but USWEST was turned away. GTE was considering a property across the highway. USWEST entered into negotiations with the private landowner, but the lease terms were no acceptable. There were not any existing communication towers within USWEST's search area at the time USWEST located this facility. USWEST also contacted Chevron and Kennydale Elementary. These parties were disinterested. In the end, USWEST chose this location, because it achieves coverage objective while staying a far distance from other residential properties. USWEST also contacted the Airport Manager.to discuss air traffic related constraints on USWEST's design. The Airport Manager indicated that USWEST pole should not be higher than the existing Texaco sign. This facility is approximately twenty-five feet shorter than the Texaco sign. • USWEST Communications-Wireless-Page 1 T: H E. WALTER GROUP B. COMMUNITY NEED: There shall be a community need for the proposed use as the•proposed location. In the determination of community need, the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors,among all other relevant information: (1) The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental overconcentration of a • particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. • The proposed location will not result in either the detrimental overconcentration of wireless services within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed location. The proposed wireless facility will provide wireless Personal Communication Services (PCS) using frequencies in the 1.9GHz range. The Federal Communications Commission regulates the use of this frequency range and limits the number of licenses for this region to provide PCS services using the 1.9GHz frequency range. Existing cellular carriers provide similar wireless services, but they are also limited in number due to the limited number of licenses issued by the FCC. Therefore, the number of similar utilities is regulated so as to not be detrimental to the market and the community. At this location, along Interstate 405, USWEST will achieve outstanding coverage of the freeway. Without a facility here at the height proposed, USWEST would need multiple sites to achieve the same coverage and capacity. There have been indications that GTE was consdering a site on the other side of the highway. USWEST is willing to allow other carriers to collocate on its pole. It.should be noted that a collocated carriers' pole is taller and has a larger visual footprint in comparison to single carrier poles. Nevertheless, USWEST appreciates the advantages of collacation to a community. In the present case,.the proposed pole is only 80 feet mall. This is relatively small for PCS monopoles which can reach heights of 120 to 150 feet •on a regular basis; 'The large number of trees lining Interstate 405 in this area will mitigate the impact of the proposed monopole as well as any possible GTE pole that may be built across the highway. (2) That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. The proposed location is suited for the use. The property is adjacent to Interstate 405 which has a large demand for wireless services. This facility must be able to complete the network between facilities located to the north and south. Without this site,there would be a hole in USWEST's coverage. C. EFFECT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. the following site requirements shall be required: (1) Lot Coverage: The maximum area coverered by the buildings shall not exceed thirty five percent (35%) of the total lot area unless the lot is five thousand (5,000) square feet or less and then lot coverage may not exceed fifty percent(50%). The proposed project will cover less than 2%of the site. (2) Yards: Yards shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in any required yard. This lot is not adjacent to a public right of way. Access is from North 30th Street, via an easement across the Texaco lot. USWEST Communications-Wireless is requesting a variance to the front yard setback. The goal of this site is to complete the network's coverage of Interstate 405. To do this, the facility must have a clear line of site to the north and south. This property is essentially adjacent to Interstate 405. Trees line I-405 in this area. Trees obstuct and absorb energy from the signal used at this facility. Moving the facility closer to I-405 USWEST Communications-Wireless-Page 2 THE WALTER GROUP reduces the number of trees between the facility and the users. It also allows for a shorter monopole, because less obstructions exist between the facility and the highway. After discussions with Peter Rosen,Project Manager for the City of Renton, the front yard will likely be the east yard of the property. The required front yard setback is twenty feet. The proposed setback is thirteen feet for the pole and eight feet for the equipment cabinets. The Department of Transportation owns the parcel to the east, a small sliver of land approximately fifty feet wide, which has been used to park construction trailers. This is adjacent to the exit ramp. The DOT's parcel is undevelopable and I-405 is a significant buffer to the any use to the east. The proposed location increase the distance between the proposed facility and existing uses to the north, south and east. This location in the front yard setback minimizes the impact of the facility on adjoining uses and meets engineering criteria for signal delivery. As for the other required yards, the pole is approximately twenty-eight feet from the south property line, one hundred and forty-five feet from the west property line, and one hundred and forty feet from the north property line. This location meets the required side(five feet)and rear(twenty feet)yards. (3) Height: Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Spires,belltowers,public utility antennas or similar structure may exceed the height requirement upon approval of a variance. Building heights should be related to surrounding uses in order to allow optimal sunlight and ventilation, and minimal obstruction of views from adjacent structures. USWEST Communications-Wireless request a variance for height. In order for the signals transmitted and received from this facility to reach users in the area, the facility must have a line of sight to its assigned ' coverage area. Further, in order for users to not be dropped from the network, the facility must clear nearby obstructions, such as trees and buildings in order to have a strong signal and clear signal patter. If this facility cannot deliver a strong signal within its assigned coverage area, then the proposed facility will not be able to hand-off users to neighboring USWEST Communication-Wireless facilities. Engineers have conducted network and site specific studies to determine that the proposed facility must have the height shown,eighty feet,to be effective. D. Compatability: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. The proposed facility is adjacent to the highway and the Texaco gas station. In the proposed location, it is located over one hundred feet from any residential property. Trees and elevations obscure the facility from public view. Furthermore, it is next to a one hundred and eight foot Texaco sign. This tower will dominate the proposed facility. This facility accoplish its coverage goals from a location that is compatible with the neighborhood. E.Parking: No new parking is required for this proposal. Eighteen parking spaces exist on site. They service eight apartment units. This facility will not reduce the number of existing spaces. F. Traffic: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on,and to ensure save movement in the surrounding area. USWEST Communications-Wireless anticipates one vehicle trip per quarter to the facility. The trips generally occur in the late evening hours when the use of the facility drops. Parking bollards protect the facility from traffic. • USWEST Communications-Wireless-Page 3 G. Noise,Glare: Potential noise,light,and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. This facility does not generate significant noise. There are not any generators proposed. A battery backup systerm supplies emergency power. There will be an FAA required red light atop the monopole. This light will be eighty feet above ground. Given the facilities location next to a gas station that is lit for most of the evening and night hours,the FAA light will not impact the area. H. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied-by building or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer .adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. The equipment cabinets are set into the slight slope or berm on the east edge'of the parking•lot. An additional fence above the retaining wall will surround three sides of the cabinets. Parking bollards will be placed between the cabinets and the parking lot. On-site vegetation obscures the facility from the owner's apartments. Existing trees buffer the cabinets and pole from adjacent uses on all sides. F. Accessory Uses Not applicable. G. Conversion Not applicable. K. Public Improvements: The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose uponan undue burden" public improvements, facilities, 'utilities, and:services. on any P 1 Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditioned upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements,facilities,utilities and/or services. This facility requires power and telephone which are already available on site. CONCLUSION Along with the requested variance, USWEST Communications-Wireless seeks an administrative conditional use permit to allow its wireless communication facility to be placed on this Single Family zoned parcel. After reviewing other potential locations, USWEST Communications-Wireless propses a facility at this site to meet the wireless communication network's demands. Without a site at this location, there will be a hole in network coverage. •I • USWEST Communications-Wireless-Page 4 .y APPLICANT'S JUSTIFICATION FOR VARIANCE PROJECT NAME: USWEST Interstate 405 Exit 6 PCS Site-SEA041 REQUEST USWEST Communications-Wireless proposes a PCS (Personal Communications Services)wireless communication facility at 1416 N. 30th Street. USWEST requests a height and front yard setback variance in an R-8 (SF)zone. This zone's maximum height limit is 35 feet and front yard setback is 20 feet. The proposed antenna support pole is 80 feet tall and is set back from the front lot line 12 feet. The five foot tall equipment cabinets are approximately 8 feet from the front lot line. This proposal meets the minimum requirements set by USWEST's radio frequency engineers. A strict application of the zoning code would prohibit delivery of service to users. Therefore,USWEST requests a variance based upon the following ep criteria: +�g9 - �Vet, 0P 1. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special •'/ 799 circumstances applicable to subject property,including size,shape,topography,location or DVE1.0P surrounings of the subject property,and the strict ap of the Zoning Code is found ication deprive subj subject property owner of rights and privilegeslenjoyed by other property owners into tthe Ca},FCAft iA Nt`NAUNG. vicinity and under identical zone_classifications: Strict application of the Zoning Code would prohibit USWEST Communications -Wireless' network from delivering service to the Kennydale area, Renton and Interstate 405. Topography and surrounding obstructions such as trees, greatly affect wireless service. This facility needs to be able to "look" up and down 1-405,rise above the trees, and be able to "see"the neighboring facilities. The R8 zone development standards do not allow for a workable wireless facility unless a variance is granted. In order to send and receive a strong signal, a PCS (Personal Communication Services) wireless network consists of several small sites rather than one site, because the signal strength is not powerful enough to cover a large area from one site. USWEST's PCS network operates in the 1.8GHz range. Wavelengths in this spectrum travel a limited distance. In fact, they travel about half the distance of traditional cellular waves, which are in the 800Mhz range. Therefore, to deliver service to the City of Renton and the I-405 corridor, USWEST's PCS service needs to be delivered from several sites in and about the city and along the highway,rather than from one or two sites. This site is one of the sites needed to deliver service to the City of Renton and the I-405 corridor. A second factor in sending and receiving a strong signal to customers is to maintain an unobstructed path between the customer and the facility's antennas. Generally,this is measured by line of sight. Topography and vegetation present obstructions to the signal sent from a wireless communication facility. Hills and trees can completely block signals or absorb energy from signals so that they fade out sooner than desired. In order to send and receive strong unobstructed signals in this area, the wireless communication facility must be located in such a manner that the antennas have a "line of sight" or clear path to the customers within reach of the signals sent and received by the facility. In the present case, this facility has a relatively short pole at eight feet (many poles exceed one hundred feet) due to the higher elevation of the property and location next to the highway. Nevertheless, a significant number of trees in the area, as well as the surrounding topography demand that this pole be at least eighty feet in order to maintain a line of sight to the facility's assigned coverage area. As designed, this facility's location and design will deliver a strong signal to the surrounding area. A strong signal is only effective if it can reach another USWEST facility. As a mobile customer moves through the network,he or she is handed off from facility to facility. Therefore,each facility in the network is designed with its neighboring facilities' design in mind. Altering this facility's location or height will impact and disrupt the surrounding facilities' location and design. For example, lowering the height would cause USWEST to build more sites in order to maintain line of sight between facilities. USWEST Communications-Wireless-Page 1 Finally, the network must have the capacity to meet the demand for service. Wireless technologies are moving beyond telephone calls from pedestrians on the street and people in automobiles. The public demand for wireless modems,paging,facsimiles,security systems and other future technologies require that communication facilities not only be able to send and receive signals in their limited coverage areas, but also have the capacity to handle all the customers within the facility's coverage area. To meet capacity, several communication facilities are required to service densely populated areas. To • - illustrate, even if one communication facility could deliver a strong signal to all of Renton of the I-405 corridor, one facility would not have the capacity to handle all the customer. To draw an analogy, one regular land line phone switch cannot handle all of King County's phone calls, so phone companies place several switches within the community to meet capacity requirements. This facility is one of several assigned to handle the capacity demands of I-405 and the surrounding Kennydale area. Wireless carriers have capacity problems because they use a small portion of the radio frequency spectrum. This small portion of spectrum can only handle a limited number of"calls." To get around this limitation, coverage targets are divided into small areas and a communication facility is assigned to each small area. That allows each site to use that small portion of spectrum to cover the smaller number of people within that portion of the overall community. If the proposed design is altered or prohibited, the surrounding facilities would be unable to maintain their own capacity in an effort to make up for the lost capacity that is to be provided by this facility. As shown, several factor drive the network design and the design of the facility at hand. Coverage, ability to hand off and capacity are integrated considerations. More than one communication facility is required to cover the community because the signal can only travel a limited distance. At the same time, using several communication facilities allows for greater capacity on a small portion of spectrum. Coordinating the physical design and location of facilities allows for mobile use. Together, these strategies allows the engineers to use the fewest number of facilities to provide coverage to a large number of users. This location was picked and designed with the overall network in mind. It is needed in order to provide service within its coverage area,and to support the demands of the network as a whole. To meet the network requirements in Renton and along the I-405 corridor, an eighty foot pole with receiving and transmitting antennas is needed at this proposed facility. USWEST's radio frequency engineers have conducted propagation tool analysis, topographical analysis and overall network design review to determine that the antennas must have a centerline of at least seventy seven and a half feet(77 1/2') to provide effective service to the community within the coverage area and to successfully "hand off' mobile customers to surrounding communication facilities. In addition, the engineers need to be closer to the highway in order to avoid obstructions. -The trees that line I-405 in the vicinity are an obstruction to the signal. Evergreen trees absorb the signals energy, thereby reducing its range and effectiveness. If the pole were pushed away from the highway, it would have to be taller. Due to the airport overlay,this would not be advisable. A few feet of setback can make a difference,for at least two reasons. First,within the first two hundred feet of the antennas,the signal transmitted forms a required pattern. This pattern forming area is called the near field. Obstructions within the near field interfere with the signal pattern formation which can severely impact the service. Second, obstructions in the immediate vicinity create a "shadow" or an area without coverage to users passing nearby. In this case, if the facility is farther from the freeway, the trees and on- ramp to the east will cast a shadow between the antennas and users as they drive past the facility on I-405. Further, the 30th Street overpass also creates a shadow and a near field obstruction. The proposed location reduces the impact the overpass has on the signal. Strict application of the Zoning Code would impose an undue hardship as the technology and frequency would be pushed beyond its flexibility,unless USWEST built significantly more monopoles in the USWEST Communications-Wireless-Page 2 community. Even then,the results were not be as effective. Therefore,USWEST request a variance for ty q height and setback. 2. That granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: This facility,as proposed,is next to the highway and a gas station. It is as far from adjacent properties as possible. Existing trees obscure the facility from view in all directions. In addition,the ground cabinets will be screened in part by the ground in which it is inset and a wire woven fence. The frequency used is regulated by the FCC and is separate and distinct from frequencies used by television and radio stations. Therefore,it will not interfere with use of televisions and radios. - The FAA Seattle Regional Office has determined that the proposed facility will not constitute an obstruction to air navigation. They have required a top mounted red light. The proposed pole is significantly lower than the 108 foot tall Texaco sign to the south which is also lighted. 3. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the property is situated: Wireless networks require line of sight from antennas to users. Topography,vegetation and other obstructions must be overcome to deliver wireless services. Regardless of location,these factors come into play and drive the design of each wireless facility. 4. That the approval as determined by the Board of Adjustment is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose: USWEST Communication-Wireless' Radio Frequency(RF)Engineers conducted an on-site analysis, network design review,propagation tool analysis,airport overlay review and zoning review before selecting the final height. The Airport Manager indicated that USWEST's pole should be no higher than the Texaco sign nearby. The Texaco sign is one hundred and eight feet. The RF engineers did not need that much height. They need a minimum of eighty feet as proposed to meet the network requirements. This is at approximately twenty five feet lower than the Texaco sign. Aware of constraints at this location,RF balanced this design with the heights of surrounding facilities. In addition,the proposed facility is not flush to the property line. Although,the pole is not adjacent to developable property,RF engineers agreed to the minimum intrusion on the setback necessary to overcome nearby obstructions such as the trees,the on-ramp and the overpass. CONCLUSION USWEST Communications-Wireless'request for a variance to height and setback are based on technology considerations. The justifications focus on delivering quality service to the surrounding community with minimal impact. USWEST Communications=Wireless-Page 3 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project: USWEST PCS Site - SEA041 RE , 2. Name of Applicant: USWEST Communications -Wireless NA ' F � � 1997 3. Mailing address,phone number of applicant and contact person: DFvELopMEN1.p Applicant: Contact Person: C�Ty�FReNoNN�'VG Jim Bowen Russ Stromberg USWEST Communications -Wireless The Walter Group 1249 NE 145th Room 105 1109.First Avenue, Suite 205 Seattle,WA 98155 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 345-2336 (206) 467-8704 Architect: Bechtel Design Engineering Ed Jenckes, Field Construction Manager 8140 Old Highway 99 1 Tumwater,WA 98501 (360) 352-7917 4. Date checklist prepared: 3/7/97 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing,if applicable): Immediate construction when approved. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected (with this proposal? If yes, explain. One additional panel antenna per sector may be added at some future time should network traffic needs indicate that additional capacity is required.Additional growth cabinet may be ,added on proposed pad. Listanyenvironmental 8. information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared 'directly related to this proposal. A geotechnical report has been or will be prepared. 1,1 Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Not known. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,if known. City of Renton Conditional Use Permit,Building Permit, SEPA. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including uses and the size of the project and ite. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. USWEST proposes a wireless telecommunications facility in the City of Renton. USWEST will construct a PCS wireless communications facility consisting of a eighty foot (80') tall metal monopole with a base diameter of approximately three feet; a 3' lightning rod affixed atop the monopole; three (3) arrays of two (2) antennas (a total of six [6] antennas)mounted on the monopole; a 12" GPS antenna; base station equipment cabinets mounted on grade (concrete pad 9'6" x 12'); all of which is surrounded by a chain link fence. The entire site is 25' x 19'. 12. Location of proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including street address,if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If the proposal would occur over a range of area,provide the range of boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan,vicinity map and topographic map,if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. USWEST's proposal is located at 1416 N. 30th Street. in the City of Renton.. The legal description is on the drawings. 13. Assessor Parcel Number: 334210-3240 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep, slopes, mountains, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Less than 1%. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example: clay, sand, gravel,peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Subsurface conditions consist of 4 inches of topsoil overlying medium stiff fine sandy silt with organic matter to the depth of about 5 feet. Medium dense fine to medium sand with silt was encountered from a depth of 10 feet and overlies medium dense fine to medium sand to a depth of 20 feet. Medium dense to dense fine sand with silt to silty fine sand with gravel was encountered from 20 feet to the bottom of the boring. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? if so, explain No. e. Describe the purpose, type and approximately quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source in fill. As presently planned, the proposed ancillary equipment will be supported on a concrete slab-on-grade. The on-grade slab will measure 12 feet by 9 feet 6 inches and will support an equipment load of approximately 3,200 pounds. To reduce potential differential movement of the equipment slab the natural subgrade soils should be compacted to a firm and unyielding condition and 12 inches of crushed rock should be placed to support the slab subgrade. The upper 12 inches of the natural soils and any new fill placed for slab support should be compacted if practicable to a minimum of 95% of the maximum density defined by ASTM D1557. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction or use? If so, generally describe. No. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surface after project construction (for example: asphalt or buildings)? Less than 1% impervious surface will be added to the site. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth,if any: Not applicable. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities,if known. Incidental vehicle emissions from construction vehicles. No emissions are generated by the operation of the facility. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any. Not applicable. 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater,lakes,ponds,wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream and river it flows into. No. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within feet) the described waters? If,yes please describe and attach available plans. No. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not applicable. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdraws or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities,if known. No. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plan. If so, note location on the site plan. No 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description,purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage;industrial, agricultural; etc.): Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the systems(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) the method of collection and disposal,if any (including quantities,if known). Where will this water flow? Will this flow into other waters? If so, describe. Not applicable. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground, and runoff water impacts,if any. Not applicable. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder,maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar,pine other X shrubs pasture crop or grain wet solid plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,if any. None. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not known. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any. Not applicable. 6. Energy and Natural Resources • a. What kind of energy (electric, natural gas, oil,wood, stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrical energy will be used for operation of radio base station equipment and cooling fan. Backup batteries will be used for emergency power. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kind of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any None. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards,including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazard waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, explain. None. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. None required. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, If any None required. b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the projection a short-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Incidental noise associated with construction will be short term. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any. None proposed. Construction noise impact is minimal. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Multi-family is currently on the site. The lot is surrounded by I-405 a gas station and residential housing. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. A multi-family apartment building is currently located on the lot. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? • No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R-8 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Unknown. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area. If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how may people would reside or work in the completed project. None. The site is unmanned. Maintenance visits would be approximately one visit per quarter. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any? Not applicable. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. None. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided,if any? Indicate whether high middle for low-income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how may units, if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. Not applicable. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas;what is the principle exterior building material(s) proposed? 80 foot galvanized steel monopole. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None known. The visual footprint is minor,which would only slightly alter any view across from the property. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any. The monopole should be obstructed by some of the surrounding trees on the lot. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any? None proposed. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Unknown. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,including recreation Opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant,if any? Not applicable. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state or local ;preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe? No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or 'cultural impotence known to be on or next to the site? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. Not applicable. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving and site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans,if any. N 30th St. Is to the south and access to the site would be through an existing easement. b. Is site currently serviced in public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Public transit is available within the vicinity. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None necessary. No existing parking spaces would be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so,generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water,rain, or air transportation? If so,generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known,indicate when peak volumes would occur. At least one vehicle trip per quarter is anticipated for maintenance purposes, otherwise the site will be unattended. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any. None necessary. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so,generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any. Not applicable. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas,water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and I the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Puget Power and USWEST telephone service. C. SIGNATURE [The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Si!. re of P I pjnt/Applicant: M� W /Lie tAII.Ai r The Walter Gro p Agent for the A plicant Date • MAR 11 '97 02:23PM P.272 c . U S WEST Communlcatlone,Ir 12121 Grant Street Room 201 Thornton,Colorado 80241 WirnIess CQMMUNICA77ONS March 11, 1997 Mr. Russ Stromberg Zoning and Land Use Consultant The Walter Group Mr. Stromberg: I have recently received a response (copy attached) from the FAA Seattle Regional Office concerning one of our previous filings. In this case, our proposed structure has been determined not to constitute an obstruction to air navigation, however a top mounted red obstruction light will be required. Reference is made to FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1 I, for reference to specific details of the lighting parameters. If you require, I can provide excerpts for you. I have also enclosed a copy of the Aeronautical Study Determination for you records. The following site is involved in this requirement: Site Designation: SEA041 Site Address: 1416 North 30th, Renton, WA This study is valid until May 30, 1998. If there are any changes to this site, an amended filing must be completed, and the results may be altered. Full study documentation will be maintained physically at my location for a minimum of one year, and electronically indefinitely in our cell site data base. If I can provide any additional information or documentation please call me on 303-255-6149. Yours truly, Jim Verseman Federal Regulatory, Compliance Manager QV ED cc: Wayne Leuck MAR 2 7 1997 Mark Poletti Bill LaFave (Bechtel) DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON • II l'IHR 11 '97 t j7:20AM P.3/3- SEA041 Form Approved OMB NO.2120-0001 onautieal S Number Notice of Proposed Q 4M-Q J eConstruction or Alteration6 __, ` ' Fa done Medan Amelehtmtlon 1. Nature of Proposal 2. Complete Description of Structure A.Type B.Class C.Work Schedule Dates Please describe,on a separate sheet 0f paper if necessary, El New Construction 0 Permanent Begging 10/30/96 the proposed construction or alteration. ID * 02/01/97 A.For proposals involving transmitting stations,include Alteration CI (Duration manthsJ End effective radiated power(ERP)and assigned frequency of cif Alteration,provide previous FAA Aeronautical Study Number,it available: all proposed or modified transmitters on the Structure.Ill 3A. Name,address,end telephone number of Individual,company corporation,etc_preparing the not known,give frequency band and maximum ERP). canetruotlon or alteration. `Number.Serest;City.State,and Zip Coda B.Far proposals Involving overhead wire.transmission tines, JIM VERSE MAN etc.,include the size and the configuration of the wires and U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS their supporting structures. ROOM 2 01, 12121 GRANT C.For all proposals,include site orientation.dimensions,and THORNTON, CO 8 0 241 construction materials of the proposed or altered structure. king ( 303 ) • _ -6149 D.lOighting e system dsired fortional—Descre theryyour Strut The FAA willnd Ikea Code Telephone Number recommend appropriate Marking and lighting for the 3B. Name,address and telephone number of proponent's representative,if different than 3A.above. Circular structure in 70a(7 50-1.ance with the standards andof Advisoryng Circular AC 70/74ti0-1.An FAA marking lighting recommendation will reflect the minimum acceptable level • of conspicuity necessary to warn plots of the presence of an object.However,the FAA.under certain circumstances,will not object to the use of a system(such as a medium intensity flashing white fight system or a dual lighting system)other than the recommended standard. (I Area Code) •Telephone Number /. 51FX �h) /. //a (el fit' 6GG f W P 4. Location Of Structure 5. Height and l:levatian tat nurse tao, A.Coordinates 17 hunt/Elms of`eecnal' B.Nearest City or Town C.Nearest public or military airport. A.Elevellen of site above mean and State heliport.IIIghtpark,or seaplane base sea level. Latitude DI ►I a uAnnydale, WA47 WILL ROGERS WILEY POST MEML 214 47 31 aa.ao . Longitude of rl ,, (1).Distance DO4B N.Distance from structure to nearest B.Height of structure Including all 9 point of nearest runway appurtenances and lighting above 1 122 11 51.00 0 Miles 1.4494 rim. ground or water. 83 40. Source of coordinate information for item 4A.above- (2).Direction to 413 (2).Direction from SINClure to airpot C.Overall height above mean see level ❑USGS wuroh5' DSurvey totther 277 Deg. 217,44 Degrees (A•91 297 Quad Chen. pacify ,]:25K Topo 6athvmetric - - Inditato the re$renoe dawn of me coordinate%II Mums 4E.Describe,on a separate sheet at paper,the location of the site with respect to highway, Streets,airports, AD 27 NAP Other prominent terrain features.existing structures,etc.Attach a copy of a U.S.Geological Survey quadrangle mep 7.5 i� (]Specify minute series(or equivalent)showing the construction site.If available,attach a copy of a documented site survey with the surveyor's certification. FAILURE TO PROVIDE ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION MAY DELAY PROCESSING OF YOUR NOTICE • Notice is required by Part 77 at the Federal Aviation Regulations 114 C.F.R.Pan 77J pursuant to Section 1101 of the Federal Aviatdn Act oe 1958.as amended(49 U.S.C.app.§15011.Poisons who knowingly and wilfully violate the Notice requirement;of Pam 77 are subject u a tint Density d 51.000 per day unfit the nonce is received.pursuar l to Senor Sol fs)of the Fede it Aviation Am of lase!es amended 149 U-S.C.app§147109 as well as the line(cnminal penalty(of rnt more than 5500 for the first offense and not more than 52.000 for subsequent offenses.pursuant to Seaton 902(a)or the Federal Aviation Act of 1950.as amended(49 U.B.C.app§1472101). I HEREBY CERTIFY that all of the above statements made by me are True,complete,and correct to the best of my.knowledge.In addition,I agree to obstruction mark and/or light the structure In accordance with established marking&lighting standards a necessary. Date Typed or Printed Name aril We at Person Flung Nose. I Signature 09/27/96 Jim Verseman Engineering Manager I FOR FAA USE ONLY FM will either return lh/s form or issue a separate acknowledgement. Th a Proposal: Supplemental Notice of Cotuhucton,FM Form 7460-2,is required any time the project is abandoned.m t0�Does not requite a nun b FAA. ❑Al bast 48 bows before the tun a cotubuclfen. ' IL►is my Wattled as en obsfiud('ends,any standard of FAR,Pan T7. 1__I wtemn ha says alter the ` s cis WO Subpad C.aid would net be s hazard to milieus This determnslon eapirrhs m C" -? V i 6 _ .. unisex ❑ly kwdfed as en obstructer under the standards of FAR,Pan 77. (a)seemed,revised w terminated by do Musing olfk% Subpart4tawi C.erl weave not be a ward a navigation_ (bl the conelemeen is subjactb the licensing authority of the Federal Corimemicafons Cenere ate(FOCI+lid en applicatim fin a teusfuctlen permit is median tie FCC on or before the above expiation dire.In such celeste defernlruton 8houltl be obstru.4lotF Marked�llghted Fur alphas on the date prescribed try the FCC ter component ofcataDuctbn.or on to dole she FCC denies the application. is Pg� NOTE Request fur extension of the effective period of end determination must be posbnarted Of delivered le the Issuing office Circular 70R/641.Chapters 7lm "i si i ai roast Is days prig In the up,ion dal, L obse eon mambie and lighting ire net necessary. if tree etudes is subject tame forting namely el the FCC.a copy of this deterninaion will be nerd to fit agency. Ramos • NAD 83 Coordinates future correspondencoordinace wit the ler FMI �atitud � /r Q�. Itgitude 1 ,je �I 1 �{1j,�j .�l3 ,ce:1.,,22!LO (0164 g 0 , , . . . ,-1 ,'!,. **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 03/27/97 16 : 02 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9701845 Amount : 1,450 . 00 03/27/97 16 : 01 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #1045725 US WEST Init : JAC Project #: LUA97-041 Type : LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 334210-3240 Site Address : 1416 N 30TH ST Total Fees : 1,450 . 00 This Payment 1,450 . 00 Total ALL Pmts : 1,450 . 00 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0006 Conditional Use Fees 1, 000 . 00 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 200 . 00 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0019 Variance Fees 250 . 00 PLANNING CITY OF RENTON