Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA86-096 BEGINNING OF FILE FlLEZLE MICROFILMED tihing) to VeI CITY OF RENTON oil DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION November 21, 1988 Mr. James V. Harrison Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc. 2009 Minor Avenue East Seattle, Washington 98102 RE: Covenants for Mobile Oil Corporation Project Located at the Southwest Corner of N.E. Sunset Blvd. and N.E. 12th St. CU-096-86, V-005-87 Dear Mr. Harrison: This letter is to inform you that we, together with our attorney, have reviewed the set of covenants submitted to our office in October. We found that the covenant language 'needs to be amended since the existing language does not fully comply with Condition 5 of the Hearing Examiner's decision for the project. While most of the language of the condition has been incorporated, two important points of that condition have not been incorporated into the covenant language. First, the covenants do not include verbiage stating that the "City shall be held harmless" should the City be required to enter the site and remove the underground tank system. Second, the Examiner specifically included "subsidiary or indirect costs" as costs the City would be reimbursed for in conjunction with the removal of the underground system. The covenants must contain this language. If you have any questions, please call Jeanette Samek-McKague at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:McK:mjp 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 i CITY OF RENTON ..1 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor /1! August 23 , 1988 James V. Harrison Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc. 2009 Minor Avenue East Seattle, WA. 98102 RE: Covenants for Mobile Oil Corporation Project Located at the Southwest Corner of N.E Sunset Blvd and N.E. 12th St. , file CU-096-86, V-005-87 Dear Mr. Harrison: The City has completed its review of the covenants you submitted to our office in compliance with Conditions No. 4 and 5 of the Hearing Examiner Decision approving the Mobile Oil Corporation Conditional Use Permit application. Condition No. 4 requires covenants be executed to assure the removal of the underground tank system should the operation cease for more than 12 consecutive months. Condition No. 5 establishes that the applicant shall pay the costs of the tank system removal should it become necessary for the City to remove the system. The proposed set of covenants satisfies Condition No. 4 but does not satisfy Condition No. 5. The covenants should provide language which would give the City a right of entry to remove the system should the owner fail to do so together with granting the City all costs associated with the removal, including interest, as well as any subsidiary or indirect costs incurred by the City shall operate as a lien against the property. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 James Va. Har: on August 23, 19�- Page 2 The language of the covenants should. closely follow the language of Conditions No. 4 and 5 of the Examiner's Decision. A copy of the conditions is enclosed. Please revise the covenant document and submit a copy for our review and approval. If you have any questions, please call Jeanette Samek- McKague or me at 235-2550. i Sncerel Y, If j"F 7) 40141 Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:McK:mjp Enclosures :w fit` i‘ A .fit `' "f'BUSH, ROED AND HITCHING;,,--NC. ;'CU-096-86 & V-005-87 May 4, 1987 Page 5 r 11 • 15. The applicant has cited other businesses which may not adhere to the setback requirements. The Court has even dealt with the applicant's reliance on similar non-conformity on adjacent or nearby property. The court indicated that if the variance gave the applicant the benefits of the earlier zoning provisions, whatever they may have been, the public benefits of the changed code would be totally negated. "In addition, granting variances based upon the proximity of similar but non-conforming uses could prove destructive to the County's zoning objectives. Ling v. Whatcom Cy. Bd. of Adj., 21 Wn. App. 497,500, 585 P.2d 815 (1978)" (Ibid.) Like the court in St. Clair, this office can only conclude that the lots in question are non-conforming and established prior to the amendments requiring the 10 foot setbacks. The variance is not justified upon this basis. 16. The applicant has failed to demonstrate that the site cannot be reasonably utilized, only that the subject proposal would be constrained by complying with the cited provision. The variance must be denied. 1 17. In addition, as indicated in the analysis of the Conditional Use Permit, it would appear that the applicant by now incorporating a convenience store on the premises has attempted to squeeze too much on the site. Besides eliminating required landscaping, two of the three parking stalls are located in such a manner as to block access to the enclosed trash receptacle, and it would appear that a fuel delivery truck as well as the truck which delivers convenience items could impede general circulation on the site. DECISION ;The Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The installation of state-of-the-art double wall gasoline storage tanks and subsystems which shall include monitors between the tank walls. ' 2. The installation of impermeable barriers between the tanks, pumps and pipes, and the underlying and surrounding soils; and the installation of monitors between the gasoline system and the barrier. 3. For purposes of this decision "state-of-the-art equipment" shall mean and be defined as: the most modern and technologically advanced system known for gasoline containment purposes, and shall be of the type of equipment which is installed where the strictest of leak detection and prevention is required. 4. The execution of Restrictive Covenants assuring the removal of the entire underground system if the operation should cease or be discontinued for more than 12 consecutive months. The Covenants shall require that the then property owner has the legal and economic responsibility for removing the system, but failure to do so shall entitle the City to accomplish that purpose by entering onto the property and removing such equipment in any reasonable manner necessary. 5. The Covenants shall grant the City all costs associated with removal including interest, if applicable, as well as any subsidiary or indirect costs, and shall operate as a lien against the property, and the City shall be held harmless. In addition, other consequences or costs of removal including any adverse but reasonably anticipated costs of removal such as closure of, or interference with current on-site enterprises, shall be solely the responsibility of the property ' owner. I The Variance is denied. ORDERED THIS 4th day of May, 1987. FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER • b.0.0 Ft Cyr&- $i 0 CITY OF RENTON rLL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director MEMORANDUM DATE: July 13 , 1988 TO: Larry Warre , - ttorney FROM: Donald Erickson, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Mobile Oil Corporation Restrictive Covenants 3002 N. E. Sunset Boulevard The Planning Division of the Community Development Department has received from the, firm of Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc. a draft copy of proposed restrictive covenants as required by the Hearing Examiner for Conditional Use Permit No. CU-096-86. These covenants are required to assure the removal of the underground system if the operation should cease or be discontinued for more than 12 consecutive months (see items 4 & 5 of attached Hearing Examiner Report Decision) . Would you please review these covenants for content and determine if the language is acceptable. If so, we will. have Mobile Oil Corporation finalize the document with the necessary signatures. DKE:JFL 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 pF R�iv .. o THE CITY OF RENTON U Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 z �L ° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 0 FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 �P O,94 7 o SEPSE�O June 18, 1987 Arthur L. Storbo, P.E. CH2M Hill P. O. Box 91500 Bellevue, Washington 98009-2050 Re: CU-096-86 - Mobil Oil Company Dear Mr. Storbo: I have read your letter of June 5, 1987, received by this office on June 10, 1987. The answer will not be any different than the one that you received from Dotty Klingman. As she indicated, it is most unfortunate that the applicant did not fully read and understand the decision prior to the expiration of the appeal period. After the appeal period has expired this office cannot modify the decision. Regarding some of your comments, obviously the older applications were not guided by the newer studies. This office has consistently applied the same conditions in all recent reviews. I am not sure how those conditions have been interpreted. If this office can be of any further assistance please feel free to call. Sincerely, F D J. OF HEARING XAMIN FJK/dk cc: Mayor Barbara Shinpoch Lawrence Warren, City Attorney Building and Zoning Department Engineers r� Planners ` ECEIVED CHAIHILL Economists MIN Scientists JUN 101987 June 5, 1987 CITY OF RENT®IV MAR= EXAMINER S20080 .B0 Mr. Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Kaufman: Subject: Mobil Station at Southwest Corner of NE Sunset Boulevard and NE 12th Street This letter is written to follow up telephone conversations I had with Ms. Dotty Klingman of your office on June 1 and June 2, 1987. CH2M HILL has been requested by Mr. Ron Olsen, City of Renton Utilities Engineer, to review the Mobil station submittal for conformance with the City' s proposed aquifer protection ordinance and secondary containment ordinance. In so requesting, Mr. Olsen has provided us with a copy of the Hearing Examiner' s Report and Decision dated May 4 , 1987, which details the results of the April 21, 1987, hearing. CH2M HILL has reviewed three similar submittals over the past 2 years. Copies of our letters to the City following each of these reviews- are enclosed. It was our intent to respond with a similar letter following review of the Mobil station submittal. We cannot make a response, however, until one issue cited in the Hearing Examiner' s Report and Decision is clarified. The first of these reviews, for the Texaco service station, was done in early 1985 before the City of Renton began drafting an aquifer protection ordinance and a secondary containment ordinance. Texaco tried to anticipate the requirements of these future ordinances; the contents of these ordinances ultimately incorporated much of the information developed with Texaco and the Washington State - Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) at that time. CH2M HILL Seattle Office 777 108th Avenue,N.E.,Bellevue,Washington 206.453.5000 P.O.Box 91500,Bellevue,Washington 98009-2050 Y _ Mr. Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner Page 2 June 5, 1987 S20080 .B0 Also enclosed is a copy of each of these ordinances, which are, at this time, still in draft form. Our review of the Plaid Pantry and ARCO service station submittals was made with reference to these two draft ordinances . In each case, we found the proposed service station improvements to be in general conformance with the goals established in the pro- posed ordinances. The aquifer protection ordinance, Section 2A, refers to the secondary containment ordinance for "secondary containment and monitoring requirements for regulated substances stored in underground storage facilities. " The secondary contain- ment ordinance, Sections 4 and 5, allows secondary contain- ment by either the outside wall of a double-walled tank or a membrane liner. It does not require both. A similar re quirement is made for secondary containment of piping. The Texaco, Plaid Pantry, and ARCO service station improvements were all approved on the basis of using double-walled tanks without a membrane liner surrounding the double-walled tanks. Secondary containment for Plaid Pantry piping was provided by a membrane liner surrounding single-walled pipe; secondary containment for ARCO piping was provided by double- walled piping. Decision items 1 and 2 in the Hearing Examiner' s Report and Decision for the Mobil service station appear to require both double-walled tanks (and pipes) and a membrane liner. This interpretation is backed by Findings item 13 and Con- clusions item 5, both of which make reference to double walls and an impermeable membrane (barrier) or liner. We believe it would be inconsistent to require double-walled tanks (and piping) and a membrane liner at the Mobil station, while only secondary containment (in conformance with the proposed ordinances) was required at the other three service stations. The potential for contamination of Renton' s aqui- fer (s) is no greater at the Mobil site than at the other three sites. Our recommendation for containment at the Mobil site would be to follow the requirements of the two ordinances cited, which would result in requirements similar to those imposed on the Texaco, Plaid Pantry, and ARCO stations. / i ,A ' _ / Mr. Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner Page 3 June 5, 1987 S20080.B0 Please let me know if I can provide any additional informa- tion. I will delay further review action on the Mobil sub- mittal until this matter is resolved. Sincerely, Arthur L. Storbo, P.E. mer/se0SC8/003 Enclosures I LETTER. AGREEMENT I - MIN Engineers NEM Planners • C.IfMHILL Economists ��•,*EC�G tl+q VE mom Scientists JUN 101987 March 15, 1985 CITY OF RENTON 517891.B0 HEARING EXAMINER Mr. Ron Olsen, Utilities Engineer City of Renton City Hall 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 V ' Dear Ron: Subject: Proposed Texaco Service Station Improvements We conclude that Texaco's proposed improvements for the ser- vice station at Bronson Way North and Factory Avenue are in general conformance with the goals established for protect ing Renton's Cedar River aquifer. These improvements include double-walled fiberglass tanks, secondary containment around piping, and the use of nonmetallic piping. This conclusion is based on our review of plans submitted to the City by Texaco, on our discussion with Tom Full (Texaco) at DSHS offices in Olympia on November 15, 1984, on our telephone conversation with Tom on November 27, 1984, and on our tele- phone conversation with John Worsham (Texaco) on March 14, - 1985. Our review of these plans should not be considered a substitute for other required reviews by the City or other agencies. In addition to what is shown on the plans, we understand that Texaco also intends the following: 1. There will be no waste oil tank onsite. 2. Pea gravel will be used for backfill of the tanks and piping, except that the top one foot of mate- rial will be crushed gravel. Filter fabric will be used at the bottom of the excavation and be- neath the top one foot of crushed gravel. . 3. The "petroleum-resistant membrane" enclosing a portion of the backfilled area will be shop assem- bled, eliminating field splices or joints, with the exception of pipe penetrations that are to be sealed per Texaco's details. There will be CH2M HILL,INC. Seattle Office 1500-114th Ave.S.F.,Bellevue,Washington 206.453.5000 P.O.Box 91500,Bellevue Washington 98009-2050 "If V, /� Mr. Ron Olsen Page 2 March 15, 1985 S17891.B0 a monitor well at the low point inside this mem- brane; all secondary containment for piping will slope to this low point. 4. Four test/observation wells, one at each corner of the underground tank layout, will be provided out- side the membrane area. These will be 6-inch PVC hydrophilic wells, 13.5 feet deep. 5. The vent lines will not be enclosed by secondary containment; however, the vent lines will be pro- tected by check valves which Texaco has found to be very reliable, and the vent lines will be pres- sure tested the same as other pipelines. 6. The exterior walls of the double-walled tanks will be tested at completion of 'construction (by leak testing the annular space) to verify there has been no construction damage to the exterior wall. 7. In addition to other planned testing, all connect- ing piping, including the vent lines, will be pres- sure tested at completion of construction to verify there has been no damage during construction. All tank and piping tests have zero leakage allowance. 8. Texaco will test their leak detectors on the tanks and pipelines once per year. 9. Texaco is currently evaluating several hydrocarbon detection devices by various manufacturers but has not sanctioned the use of any specific device yet. Texaco hopes to approve for use at least one of ' these devices by the end of 1985. In the meantime, all plumbing, conduit, and other provisions for these detection devices will be installed at the subject site. Installation of the detection devices (in the annular spaces of the double-walled tanks and in the single monitor well) shall be completed by a specific date (to be agreed upon with the City) , say July 1 , 1986, unless Texaco can provide the City with satisfactory reason for a time extension. 10. Automated storage tank gauging is currently being evaluated by Texaco but specific hardware has not been selected. In the meantime, all plumbing, conduit, and other provisions for automated gaug- ing will be installed. Texaco's selection and /Y/ Mr. Ron Olsen Page 3 March 15, 1985 . S17891.80 installation of this hardware shall follow the same commitment and time schedule as No. 9 above. 11. At completion of construction, Texaco will provide a written certification to the City stating that all construction and construction testing has been done in accordance with the plans. 12. Texaco has indicated a willingness to allow the City to locate an aquifer monitoring well on their property. Location and details of construction of such a well will be determined during the City's 1985 groundwater monitoring project. Texaco will have the right to select; the location of the observation well. 13. Oil/water separators shall be provided at the three onsite catch basins upstream of discharge to the city storm sewers. As we discussed in our meeting at DSHS offices, the ultimate responsibility for leaks and possible consequent contamina- tion of the aquifer is the station franchisee's/Texaco's. Also, any approval by the City of Texaco' s current plans for improvements should not be considered by Texaco to be a guarantee that other leak prevention/monitoring improvements will not be required of Texaco and others in the future, as may be defined by the proposed city ordinance or future state regulations on aquifer protection. Any retail gasoline facil- ities inside the aquifer boundary could at a later date be required by ordinance or state regulations to meet more strin- gent leak prevention/monitoring requirements. Sincerely, ObAA--4-44 Arthur L. Storbo jmn:se5543BB Accepted by c.A4 irk (4 tLlrt.ca, ,.t, -4 .3-if•(Pr . City o Renton Date Dire f Public' Works Accepted by - �y exaco ate ,.....,....:„..,.. . . , , , . . ,_ , _ . . .. . . . c . ! ® Engineers ® Planners CfghfHILL Economists - Scientists . May 5, 1987 S20080.B0 Mr. Ron Olson, Utilities Engineer City of Renton . City Hall 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Ron: Subject: Proposed Plaid Pantry Service Station Improvements We conclude that Plaid Pantry's proposed improvements for the service station at NE 10th Street and NE Sunset Boule- . vard are in general conformance with the goals established in the aquifer protection ordinance and the draft secondary containment ordinance. These improvements include double- walled cathodically protected steel tanks, secondary con- tainment around piping, and the use of nonmetallic piping. This conclusion is based upon our review of plans submitted to the City by Petroleum Equipment Maintenance Company and B&C Equipment Company, and upon our discussion on April 30, •. 1987, with Mr. Steve Coughlin of B&C Equipment Company. Our review of these plans should not be considered a substitute for other required reviews by the City or other agencies. • In addition to what is shown on the plans, we understand , that Plaid Pantry also intends the following: 1. There will be no waste oil, tank on site. 2. Sand will be used for backfill of the tanks and piping, except for the top 1 foot -of rnateri: .l beneath the con- crete slab. Filter fabric •will be used by the inataj ler at the interface between the sand backfill and edge `of excavation only if particle size in the native soil indicates possible migration of fines. . 3. Sections of the "petroleum-resistant membrane" (Petro • Gard Hytrel) enclosing product and vapor recovery piping in a portion of the backfilled area will be field joined .using a heat seaming process, said to be more. reliable • CH2M HILL Seattle Office 777 108th Avenue,N.E.,Bellevue,Washington 206.453.5000 P.O.Box 91500,Bellevue,Washington 98009-2050 Mr. Ron Olsen Page 2 C, May 5, 1987 520080.B0 than cementing. Pipe penetrations at the tanks will be heat sealed. There will be a 4-inch PVC hydrophyllic monitor well at the low point inside this membrane; all secondary containment for piping will slope to the low point. The monitoring well will be provided with a hydrocarbon detector. Backfill inside the membrane and around the monitoring well will be pea gravel. 4. The double-walled steel tanks will be provided with cathodic protection anodes. A Protection Prover 1 (PP1) monitoring system will be provided for periodically testing the condition of the cathodic protection system. An additional 8-inch access manhole (through the con- crete slab) will be provided near the center of each tank for access to the soil during cathodic protection tests. The tank exteriors will be holiday tested im- mediately. prior to installation., All damaged coating will be repaired prior to backfill and retested with the holiday detector. 5. Because the Plaid Pantry facility is located outside the aquifer protection area, no test/observation wells will be provided outside the membrane area. 6. The vent lines will not be enclosed by secondary con- tainment; however, the vent lines will be protected by check valves at the tanks and the vent lines will be pressure tested the same as other pipelines. 7. The exterior walls of the double-walled tanks will be tested at completion of construction (by leak testing the annular space) to verify there has been no con- struction damage to the exterior wall. 8. In addition to other planned testing, all connecting piping, including the vent lines, will be pressure tested at completion of construction to verify there has been no damage during construction. All tank and piping tests have zero-leakage allowance. 9. A Petro-tite test with product will be performed on all tanks and piping following completion of the above tests. H T Mr. Ron Olsen Page 3 May 5., 1987 520080.B0 10. Plaid Pantry will test their leak detectors on the tanks and pipelines once per year. 11. A tidel tank monitoring system will be provided to auto- matically monitor and indicate tank liquid levels and trigger an audible/visual alarm if any tank approaches an overfill condition. This system will include the capability to print out selected monitoring data. A Pollulert FD103 fluid/vapor detection system will moni- tor secondary containment space in the tanks and at the monitoring well in the Hytrel membrane surrounding product and vapor recovery piping. 12. At completion of construction, Plaid Pantry will pro- vide a written certification to the City stating that all construction and construction testing has been done in accordance with the plans. 13. An oil/water separator. will be provided at the onsite catch basin upstream of discharge to the city storm sewer. The ultimate responsibility for leaks and possible consequent contamination of the aquifer is the station franchisee's/ Plaid Pantry's. Also, any approval by the City of Plaid Pantry's current plans for improvements should notbe con- - sidered by Plaid Pantry to be a guarantee that other leak prevention/monitoring improvements will not be required of Plaid Pantry and others in the future, as may be defined by revised city ordinance or future state regulations on aquifer protection. Any retail gasoline facilities near the aquifer could at a later date be required by ordinance or state regu- lations to meet more stringent leak prevention/monitoring requirements. Sincerely, aati' Arthur L. Storbo ls/se5841/056 MEM Engineers MEM Planners Oaf HILL Economists ,Jl1N O 1987 Scientists - ITY.OF-RENTON May 5, 1987 HEARING EXAMINER 520080.B0 Mr. Ron Olson, Utilities Engineer City of Renton City Hall 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Ron: • Subject: Proposed ARCO Service Station Improvements We conclude that ARCO's proposed improvements for the service station on NE 3rd Street near Jefferson Avenue NE are in general conformance with the goals established in the aquifer protection ordinance and the draft secondary containment ordinance. These improvements include double-walled fiber- glass tanks and the use of double-walled fiberglass piping. This conclusion is based upon our review of the plans sub- mitted to the City by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. , and upon our discussion on May 4 , 1987, with Mr. Al Kendall (Barghausen) , Mr. Chuck Hutchens (ARCO) , and Mr. Del Lovell (Joe Hall Construction, Inc. ) . Our review of these plans should not be considered a substitute for other required reviews by the City or other agencies. In addition to what is shown on the plans, we understand that ARCO also intends the following: 1. There will be no waste oil tank on site. 2. Pea gravel will be used for backfill of the tanks and piping.. Filter fabric will not be used at the interface between the pea gravel backfill and the native material at the edge of the excavation because no migration of fines is anticipated. 3. Piping for product and vapor return between the tanks and dispensing units will be double-walled fiberglass. The secondary containment pipe wall will terminate at the impact valve at the dispensing unit.; the secondary containment pipe wall will terminate at an "air-tight" CH2M HILL Seattle Office 777 108th Avenue,N.E.,Bellevue,Washington 206.453.5000 P.O.Box 91500,Bellevue,Washington 98009-2050 • Mr. Ron Olson Page 2 May 5, 1987 S20080.B0 piping sump at the tank allowing the secondary piping and sump to be leak tested. Termination points for the vapor recovery piping will be similar. All piping will slope downward to the piping sump, and a monitor located in the sump will detect the presence of liquid there. The 10-inch by 14-inch plus or minus opening in the concrete island beneath each dispensing unit will be concreted up to prevent any leakage above the impact valve from passing down into the soil beneath. 4. The fiberglass tanks are provided with a striker plate beneath each opening in the tank. 5. Two inspection/monitoring wells will be provided at opposite corners of the underground tank layout. These will be 4-inch PVC hydrophyllic wells, extending to a depth 4 feet below the bottom elevation of the tanks. 6. The vent lines will not be enclosed by secondary con- tainment; however, the vent lines will be protected by check valves at the tanks, and the vent lines will be pressure tested the same as other pipelines. 7. The exterior walls of the double-walled tanks will be tested at completion of construction (by leak testing the annular space) to verify there has been no con- struction damage to the exterior wall. 8. In addition to other planned testing, all connecting piping, including the vent lines, will be pressure tested at completion of construction to verify there has been no damage during construction. All tank and piping tests have zero-leakage allowance. 9. A petro-tite test with product will be performed on all tanks and piping following completion of the above tests. 10. ARCO will test their leak detectors on the tanks and pipelines once per year. 11. A TLS tank level sensing system (same as that Texaco installed 2 years ago) will be installed to auto- matically monitor and indicate tank liquid level and trigger an audible/visual alarm if any tank approaches C . Mr. Ron Olson Page 3 May 5, 1987 S20080.B0 • an overfill condition. This system will also monitor for leaks in the tank annular spaces and piping sumps. 12. At completion of construction, ARCO will provide a written certification to the City stating that all construction and construction testing has been done in accordance with the plans. 13. An oil/water separator will be provided at the onsite catch basin upstream of discharge to the city storm sewer. The ultimate responsibility for leaks and possible conse- quent contamination of the aquifer is the station franchisee' s/ARCO's. Also, any approval by the City of ARCO's current plans for improvements should not be con- sidered by ARCO to be a guarantee that other leak prevention/ monitoring improvements will not be required of ARCO and others in the future, as may be defined by revised city ordi- nance or future state regulations on aquifer protection. Any retail gasoline facilities inside the aquifer boundary could, at a later date, be required by ordinance or state regulations to meet more stringent leak prevention/monitoring requirements. t.-0— Sincerely, Arthur L. Storbo ls/se5841/055 r{. � 1110111 Engineers ,,!Err 'Mg Planners CI JHILL Economists J U N 101987 aim Scientists CITY OF RENTON May 7 , 1987 HEARING EXAMINER S20080.B0 Mr. Ron Olsen Utilities Engineer City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue So. ' Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Ron: ,Subject: Responses to Aquifer Protection Ordinance by City Attorney Enclosed is Revision 5 of the Aquifer Protection Ordinance. • It has been modified to respond to the City Attorney' s comments to you dated April 16, 1987. The following summarizes our specific responses to each of the City Attorney's comments: 1. The unnumbered section at the top of page 2 was moved to Section 2 A. , Purpose and Intent. 2. The last sentence in Section 3 C was eliminated. 3. The entire Section 3 H (3) was taken from Article 9 of the Uniform Fire Code. After a discussion with Glen Gordon, we decided not to modify this section. Section 3 H (4) has been completely modified to narrow the definition. 4. The second sentence in Section 3 I was moved to Section 5 A (5) (b) . 5. The term critical materials in .Section 3 S was changed to regulated substances.. 6. The recommended changes were made to Section 4 A. The original Section 5 was eliminated. 7. The Public Works Department decided not to eliminate cemeteries from Section 6 A. CH2M HILL Seattle Office 777 108th Avenue,N.E.,Bellevue,Washington 206.453.5000 P.O.Box 91500,Bellevue,Washington 98009-2050 i Mr. Ron Olsen Page 2 May 7, 1987 520080.B0 8. The Public Works Department believes that the existing ordinance adoption process should provide for adequate notification of City of Renton residents. The Department is open to suggestions as to how to notify King County residents. 9. Section 6 A (4 ) is not a duplication of the Health Department rules. They have no control over the type of groundwater monitoring required in the ordinance. 10. The 10 percent aggregate volume requirement is fairly standard for spill containment. This requirement is consistent with the secondary containment ordinance. 11. The incomplete sentence •in this section was corrected. 12. Section 6 A (5) (d) , now Section 5 A (5) (d) in Revision 5, is consistent with the secondary containment ordinance. While we agree the terminology is confusing, it was not modified because Glen Gordon decided not to modify the secondary containment ordinance. Section 6 A (6) was deleted, as was Section 6 A (8 ) . 13. Section 6 A (9) , now Section 5 A (7) , is not in conflict with the secondary containment ordinance. It refers to a different type of testing. 14. Section 6 A (10) , now Section 5 D, was modified to require submittal of the log every six months. 15. See response 7. 16. The intent of Section 7 C, now Section 6 C, is to allow the application of fertilizer in quantities that will not impact groundwater. The quantity to be allowed is based on advice from the King County exten- sion service. 16A. Section 7 F, now Section 6 F, was modified to eliminate the statement regarding special or unusual circumstances. 17. Section 12 was eliminated. 18. Section 13, now Section 11, was modified to state that the notice of violation will specify a time to correct the violation. 1 r r� Mr. Ron Olsen Page 3 May 7 , 1987 520080.B0 19. Section 14 , now Section 12, was corrected. 20. Section 14 , now Section 12, was modified to include statement regarding costs of abatement. 21. A new section, Section 13, was added to incorporate laws, rules and regulations. 22. The wording in Section 15, now Section 14, was eliminated. Mr. Warren will provide alternative wording. • I believe these responses cover all of Mr. Warren' s comments. if you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Gruett4-4(1) Stuart M. Brown, P.E. Project Manager se/JMM/001/188/WTR ORDINANCE NO. SECTION 1. TITLE. This ordinance shall be hereinafter known as the "Aquifer Protection Ordinance, " may be cited as such, will be hereinafter referred to as "this Ordinance, " and same shall be and constitute Chapter , Title of Ordinance No. known as SECTION 2. PURPOSE AND INTENT • A. Purpose. The purpose of this ordinance is to establish aquifer protection areas for potable water supply wells and springs owned and operated by the City of Renton. This ordinance establishes procedures for prohibiting specific land uses within aquifer protection areas; establishes permitting, regulated substance management planning, and groundwater monitoring requirements for facilities that store, handle, use, or produce sub- stances that pose a hazard to groundwater quality; establishes requirements for the construction, inspec- tion, and maintenance of containment devices; specifies release reporting requirements and actions to be taken in the event of a violation; establishes requirements for testing of pressure pipelines, gravity, and gravity-pressure storm and sanitary sewers and appur- tenances; and specifies requirements for filling. se5861/069/1 ` Secondary containment and monitoring requirements for regulated substances stored in underground storage fa- cilities are established in Ordinance No. B. Intent. It is the intent of this ordinance to provide a method by which: 1. To protect the groundwater resources of the City of Renton. 2. To establish aquifer protection areas for wells and springs owned and operated by the City of Renton. 3. To provide a means of prohibiting specific land uses within aquifer protection areas. 4. To protect the City of Renton's drinking water supply from impacts by facilities that store, handle, use, or produce substances that pose a hazard to groundwater quality. 5. To protect public health and the environment by implementing SEPA (WAC 197-11) . se5861/069/2 6 . To extend the provisions of this ordinance beyond' the boundaries of the City of Renton in accordance with Chapter 35. 88 RCW. SECTION 3. DEFINITIONS. The following definitions apply within this Ordinance: 'A. AQUIFER shall mean a groundwater bearing geologic forma- tion or formations that contain enough saturated perme- able material to yield significant quantitie's of water to wells. B. AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA (APA) shall be the portion of an aquifer within the zone of capture and recharge area for a well or well field owned or operated by the City of Renton or the recharge-discharge area of a spring used for water supply by the City of Renton. • C. AQUIFER PROTECTION ZONES are zones of an APA designated to provide graduated levels of aquifer protection. D. CONTAINMENT DEVICE means a device that is designed to contain an unauthorized release, retain it for cleanup, and prevent released materials from penetrating into the ground. se5861/069/3 , 4 E. CONTINUOUS TRANSIT means the nonstop movement of a motor vehicle. F. DEPARTMENT means the City of Renton Public Works Department. • G. EPA shall mean the United States Environmental Protec- tion Agency. H. FACILITY means all contiguous land, structures (except for underground storage facilities as defined in Ordi- nance No. ) , other appurtenances, and improvements on the land wherein regulated substances are stored, handled, used, or produced. A private residence or dwelling is not a facility. I. GROUNDWATER means water below the land surface in the zone of saturation. J. GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL means a small diameter well installed for purposes of sampling groundwater. K. OPERATOR means any person in control of, or having re- sponsibility for, the daily operation of a facility. se5861/069/4 L. OWNER includes his duly authorized agent or attorney, a purchaser, devisee, fiduciary, and a person having vested or contingent interest in the property in question. M. PERSON shall mean any natural person, individual, pub- lic or private corporation, firm, association, joint venture, partnership, municipality, governmental agency, political subdivision, public officer, owner, lessee, tenant or any other entity whatsoever or any combination of such, jointly or severally. N. POTABLE WATER shall mean water that is satisfactory for drinking, culinary and domestic purposes, meeting cur- rent county, state, and federal drinking water standards. O. REGULATED SUBSTANCES shall mean any hazardous mate- rials, flammable liquid, combustible liquid, or toxic substance which are more particularly defined as: 1 . FLAMMABLE LIQUID is any liquid having a flash point below 100°F. and having a vapor pressure not ex- ceeding 40 pounds per square inch (absolute) at 100°F. 2. COMBUSTIBLE LIQUID is a liquid having a flash point at or above 100°F. se5661/069/5 4 3. HAZARDOUS .MATERIALS shall include such materials as flammable solids, corrosive liquids, radioac- tive materials, oxidizing materials, highly toxic materials, poisonous gases, reactive materials, unstable materials, hypergolic materials, and pyro- phoric materials as defined in Article 9 of the Uniform Fire Code and any substance or mixture of substances which is an irritant, a strong sensi- tizer or which generates pressure through exposure to heat, decomposition or other means.' 4 . OTHER SUBSTANCES shall mean: a. A Hazardous Substance as defined by Sec- tion 101 (14) of (CERCLA) , or (a) any substance designated pursuant to Section 311 (b) (2) (A) of the. Clean Water Act (CWA) ; (b) any ele- ment, .compound, mixture, solution, or sub- stance designated pursuant to Section 102 of CERCLA; (r) any hazardous waste having the characteristics identified under or listed pursuant to Section 30.01 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act (but not including any waste, the regulation of which under the Solid Waste Disposal Act has been suspended by Act of Congress) ; (d) any toxic pollutant listed under Section 307 (a) of the CWA; and (e) any se5861/069/6 • imminently hazardous chemical substance or mixture with respect to which EPA has taken action pursuant to Section 7 of the Toxic Substances Control Act. b. Hazardous Substances that include any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, re- gardless of quantity, that exhibits any of the physical, chemical, or biological proper- ties described in WAC 173-303-090, 173-303- 101, 173-303-102, or 173-303-103. c. Hazardous Waste as designated in WAC 173-303 as dangerous or extremely hazardous waste. d. Any material that may degrade groundwater quality when improperly used, stored, trans- ported, or disposed of or otherwise mismanaged. P. REGULATED SUBSTANCES MANAGEMENT PLAN shall mean a plan containing procedures to be followed to prevent, con- trol, collect, and dispose of any unauthorized release of a regulated substance. se5861/069/6.1 Q. WELL shall _ _an a pit or hole sunk ini the earth to reach an aquifer.. R. WELL FIELD shall mean an area which contains one or more wells for obtaining a potable water supply. S. WELL FIELD PROTECTION OPERATING PERMIT shall mean an authorization by the City of Renton Public Works Depart- ment for a person to store, handle, use, or produce • regulated substances within an APA. SECTION 4 . MAPS OF AQUIFER PROTECTION AREAS AND ZONES. A. APA maps developed as described in Subsection 4B are incorporated and made a part of this Ordinance. These maps shall be filed with the City of Renton Clerk's Office and maintained by the City of Renton Public Works Department. Any amendments, additions, or dele- tions to said maps shall be effective after approval by the Renton City Council and filing with the City Clerk for record. B. APA maps delineate each APA within the City of Renton. Each APA may be subdivided into two aquifer protection zones: se5861/069/6.2 1. Zone 1 : The land area situated between a well or well field owned by the City of Renton and the 180-day groundwater travel time contour, or the local recharge-discharge area of a spring used for water supply by the City of Renton. 2 . Zone 2: The land area situated between the 180-day groundwater travel time contour and the boundary of the zone of capture and recharge area for a well or well field owned or operated by the City of Renton or the boundary of the recharge area of a spring used for water supply by the City of Renton. If the aquifer supplying water to the well, well field, or spring is naturally protected by overlying geologic strata, the City of Renton may choose not to subdivide an APA into two zones. In such a case, the entire APA will be designated as Zone 2. The limits of each APA and aquifer protection zone are based on current hydro- geologic information, well field monitoring results, well field pumping rates, and recharge area estimates. C. APA maps will be updated as necessary. The basis for such an update may include, but is not limited to, the following: se5861/069/7 a. Changes in technical knowledge or available hydro- geologic information. b. Changes in pumping rate of a well or well field. c. Well field reconfiguration. d. Designation of a new APA. SECTION 5. PROHIBITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, AND PERMITTING WITHIN APAS. A. Zone 1 of an APA 1. Within Zone 1 of an APA, changes in land use or construction of new facilities that could lead to significant degradation of groundwater quality shall be prohibited. Specific land uses and types of facilities to be prohibited include surface impoundments, waste piles, hazardous waste treat- ment and storage facilities, hazardous waste landfills, solid waste landfills and transfer facilities, septic systems, petroleum-product pipelines, cemeteries, chemical manufacturing facilities, computer parts manufacturing facili- ties, lumber mills, asphalt plants, wood treating facilities, and service stations. Other changes se5861/069/8 in land use or construction of new facilities will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis at the time that a building permit or land use permit applica- tion is filed with the City of Renton or .a hearing for zoning change is held. The focus of the re- view will be on the activities to be conducted; regulated substances that will be stored, handled, used, or produced; and the potential for these activities or regulated substances to degrade groundwater quality. 2 . Five (5) years after the effective date of this ordinance, the storage, handling, usage, or pro- duction of any regulated substance at existing facilities shall not be allowed within Zone 1 of an APA. In the interim, the storage, handling, usage, or production of any regulated substance shall be allowed only as provided herein. 3. Owners of existing facilities shall apply to the Department for a Well Field Protection Operating Permit within one hundred eighty (180) days from the effective date of this Ordinance. A permit is required for each facility. All Well Field Pro- tection Operating Permits shall be renewed an- nually thereafter. The permit application shall contain: se5861/069/9 a. A list of all regulated substances, including their quantities, which are stored, handled, used, or produced at the facility being permitted. b. A list of the chemicals to be monitored through the analysis of groundwater samples. c. A detailed description of the activities con- ducted at the facility that involve the stor- age, handling, use, or production of regulated substances. d. A description of the containment devices used to comply with the requirements of 5A(4) . The permit application should contain a copy of the Regulated Substances Management Plan for the facility. e. A description of the procedures for inspection .and maintenance of containment devices. f. A description of how regulated substances will be disposed. se5861/069/11 • g. A .ite map showing the locat L of the facil- ity and its property boundaries and the lo- cations where regulated substances are stored, handled, used, and produced. The location of each containment device also should be identi- fied on the site plan. 4. Each owner of an existing facility shall, at its own expense, install one or more groundwater moni- toring wells as determined by and in a manner approved by the Department. Every owner shall, at its own expense, sample groundwater in each moni- toring well semiannually and obtain independent analytical results of the presence and concentra- tion of those chemicals (including degradation and interaction products) found in each regulated sub- stance listed in the owner's Well Field Protection Operating Permit. The analytical results shall be obtained through the use of the EPA-approved methods for water. The results shall be filed immediately with the Department. 5. Every owner of existing facilities shall: a. Provide containment devices adequate in size to contain onsite any unauthorized release of se5861/069/12 a regulated substance and prevent such sub- stances from penetrating into the ground. This provision also applies to releases that may mix with storm runoff. Design require- ments for containment devices are as follows. (1) The containment device shall be large enough to contain 110 percent of the volume of the container, in cases where a single container is used to• store, handle, use, or produce a regulated sub- stance. In cases where multiple con- tainers are used, ' the containment device shall be large enough to contain 150 per- cent of the volume of the largest con- tainer or 10 percent of the aggregate volume of all containers, whichever is greater. (2) All containment devices shall be con- structed of materials of sufficient thickness, density, and composition to prevent structural weakening of the con- tainment device as a result ,of contact with any regulated substance and shall be capable of containing any unauthorized se5861/069/13 release for at least the maximum antic- ipated period sufficient to allow detec- tion and removal of the release. (3) If the containment device is open to rainfall , then it shall be able to accommodate the volume of precipitation that could enter the secondary container during a 24-hour, 100-year storm in addition to the volume of the regulated substance storage required in Sub- section 5A (5) (a) (1) . (4) Containment devices shall be constructed so that a collection system can be in- stalled to accumulate, temporarily store, and permit removal of any storm runoff or regulated substance from the device. b. Prepare a Regulated Substances Management Plan indicating procedures to be followed to prevent, control, collect, and dispose of any unauthorized release of a regulated sub- stance. If a spill prevention control and countermeasure plan (SPCC) has been prepared in accordance with 40 CFR 112 or a contin- gency plan has been prepared in accordance se5861/069/14 4 , with 40 CFR 264 or 265, a regulated sub- stances management plan is not required, as long as the regulated substances are included in the SPCC or contingency plan. c. Prepare procedures for the daily in-house inspection and maintenance of containment devices and areas where regulated substances are stored, handled, used, and produced. Such procedures shall be in writing, and a log shall be kept of all inspection and maintenance activities. Such logs shall be submitted to the Department annually and shall be available for inspection. Inspec- tion and maintenance logs shall be maintained onsite by the owner or operator for a period of at least 3 years from the date the moni- toring was performed. d. All unauthorized releases shall be reported to the Public Works Department and Fire Department according to the provisions of this subsection. All unauthorized releases shall be recorded in the owner's inspection and maintenance log. Such an unauthorized release shall be determined to be an "un- authorized release requiring recording" if se5861/069/15 w the release is completely cap ed by the containment device. If the containment device fails to contain the entire release, the release shall be determined •to be an "un- authorized release requiring reporting." (1) Unauthorized releases requiring recording shall be reported to the Public Works Department and Fire Department within 5 days of the occur- rence. The incident report shall be accompanied by a written record including the following information: (a) List of type, quantities, and con- centration of regulated substances released. (b) Method of cleanup. (c) Method and location of disposal of the released regulated substances (indicate whether a hazardous waste manifest (s) is used) . (d) Method of future release prevention or repair. If this involves a se5861/069/16 change in operation, monitoring, or management, the owner must apply for a new Well Field Operating Permit. (e) Facility operator's name and tele- phone number.' (f) The approximate costs for cleanup to be submitted voluntarily. • The Public Works Department shall review the information submitted pursuant to the report of an unauthorized release requiring record- ing, shall review the Well Field Operating Permit and may inspect the facility. The Public Works Department shall find that the containment standards of this ordinance can continue to be achieved or the Public Works Department shall revoke the permit until appropriate modifications are made to allow compliance with the standards. (2) Unauthorized release requiring reporting shall be reported to the Public Works Department and Fire Department within 5 days of the occurrence. The report se5861/069/17 shall contain the following information that is known at the time of filing the report: (a) List of type, quantity, and concen- tration of regulated substances released. (b) The results of all investigations completed at that time to determine the extent of soil or groundwater or surface water contamination be- cause of the 'release. (c) Method of cleanup implemented to date, proposed cleanup actions, and approximate cost of actions taken to date. (d) Method and location of disposal of the released regulated substance and any contaminated soils or groundwater or surface water. (e) Proposed method of repair or re- placement of the containment device. se5861/069/18 c M (f) Facility owner' s name and telephone number. Until cleanup is complete, •the owner shall submit reports to the department every month or at a more frequent inter- val specified by the Department. The reports shall include the information requested in this ordinance. (3) Reporting a release to the City of Ren- ton Public Works Department or Fire Department does not exempt or preempt any other reporting requirements under federal, state, or local laws. 6. Semiannually, the City of Renton Public Works De- partment shall review all analytical results sub- mitted by owners in an APA to determine if a violation has occurred. Either one of the fol- lowing occurrences shall constitute a violation: a. A chemical concentration in an owner's moni- toring well (s) that exceeds applicable fed- eral, state, or county drinking water quality standards. se5861/069/19 • b. An upward trend in the concentration of a chemical. In the event of a violation, the owner shall cease to store, handle, use, or produce the regulated substance (s) containing the chemical (s) causing the violation within 24 hours of receiving written notification from the City of Renton. Upon re- ceiving written notification, the owner shall be responsible for immediately accomplishing the following: a. Locate and determine the source of the unauthorized release of the regulated substance (s) . b. Stop and prevent any further unauthorized release (s) . c. Comply with the requirements in Subsec- tion 5A (5) (d) (2) for an unauthorized release requiring reporting. The owner shall not be subject to this mandatory action if the owner can present acceptable techni- cal data that substantiates it is not responsible se5861/069/20 (. 7 for the violation. In complying this sub- section, no new regulated substance (s) may be in- troduced in the place of the regulated substance that caused the violation. 7 . Testing (test pressures, durations, and leakage allowed) of new pressure pipelines, gravity and gravity-pressure storm and sanitary sewers and appurtenances constructed in Zone 1 of an APA shall conform to the 1984 Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction by the Washington State Department of Transportation and the Washington State Chapter of the American Public Works Association (APWA) , and the APWA amendments thereto, or as modified by the City of Renton. If the Department has reason to believe that operation or proposed operation of an exist- ing piping system in Zone 1 of an APA may degrade groundwater quality, the Department may require leakage testing of the existing piping system in accordance with the above. B. Zone 2 of an APA. 1 . Within Zone 2 of an APA, changes in land use or construction of new facilities that could lead to significant degradation of groundwater quality may se5861/069/21 be prohibited. Changes in land use or construction of new facilities will be reviewed on a case-by- case basis at the time that a building permit or land use permit application is filed 'with the City of Renton or a hearing for zoning change is held. Those land uses of concern include surface im- poundments, waste piles, hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities, hazardous waste landfills, solid waste landfills and transfer facilities, surface impoundments, waste piles, septic systems , petroleum product pipelines, cemeteries, chemical manufacturing facilities, computer parts manufac- turing facilities, lumber mills, asphalt plants, wood-treating facilities, and service stations. 2. The storage, handling, use or production of regu- lated substances at existing facilities shall be allowed within Zone 2 of an APA upon compliance with the provisions in this subsection and those in Subsection 5A(5) of this Ordinance. 3. Within one (1) year of the effective date of this ordinance all owners of existing facilities who store, handle, use, or produce regulated sub- stances shall obtain a Well Field Protection Oper- ating Permit from the Department. Owners of new facilities shall apply for a Well Field Protection se5861/069/22 C 4 Operating Permit after their building permit is approved. A permit is required for each facility. All Well Field Protection Operating Permits shall be renewed annually thereafter. The permit shall contain all items required by Subsection 5A(3) , except for item b; a list of chemicals to be monitored. L C. Conditions for Residential Development 1 . Within Zone 1 and Zone 2 of an APA, new residen- tial development shall, as a condition of approval, be required to connect to a central sewer system prior to occupancy. 2. Within Zone 1 of an APA, the use of heating oil is prohibited in any new residential development. D. Conditions for Fill Sites 1. All filling activities within Zone 1 or Zone 2 of an APA shall comply with the provisions the Washington State Minimum Functional Standards for Solid Waste Handling (173-303 WAC) and the King County Board of Health Rules and Regulations No. 8, Minimum Functional Standards for Solid Waste Handling. Prior to initiat- ing any filling activity, the property owner must submit se5861/069/23 a + ; a report to the City of Renton Public Works Department describing how fill materials will be tested to demon- strate that leaching of these materials will not degrade groundwater quality. During the filling activity, the property owner must keep a log identifying the source (s) of all fill materials and where they are placed in the fill. A copy of the log must be submitted to the De- partment every 6 months until the filling activity is completed. Within 5 days of completing the filling activity a copy of the entire log must be submitted to the Department. SECTION 6. EXEMPTIONS. A. Exemption for continuous transit--The transportation of any regulated substance through Zone 1 of an APA shall be allowed provided the transporting vehicle is in con- tinuous transit. B. Exemption for use of certain regulated substances--The use of certain regulated substances, such as pesti- cides, herbicides and fungicides, in recreational, agricultural, pest control and aquatic weed control activities shall be allowed provided that in all APAs: 1. The use is in strict conformity with the use re- quirements as set forth by the EPA and as indicated on the containers in which the substances are sold. se5861/069/24 4 4 2. The user applies for a Well Field Operating Permit. C. Exemption for the Use of Nitrates Contained in Fertil- izers--The use of fertilizers containing nitrates shall be allowed in Zone 1 and Zone 2 of an APA provided that: 1. No single application of nitrate containing materi- als shall exceed one-half (0.5) pound of nitrogen per thousand square feet nor five (5) pounds of nitrogen per thousand square feet per year. 2. The user applies for a Well Field Operating Permit. E. Exemption for Retail Sales Activities--Retail sales establishments in both zones of an APA that store and handle regulated substances for resale in their origi- nal unopened containers of two (2) gallons or sixteen (16) pounds, or less, shall be permitted, provided that those establishments shall apply for a Well Field Pro- tection Operating Permit. In order to obtain a Well Field Protection Operating Permit said establishments need only provide an inventory of regulated substances and an annual update. se5861/069/25 F. Petition Process for Special Exemption--An affected owner in Zone 1 or Zone 2 of an APA may petition the Department for a special exemption from the prohibi- tions set out in Sections 5A and 5B. In granting the special exemption, the Department may prescribe any additional appropriate conditions and safeguards which are necessary to protect a well, well field, or spring within an APA. SECTION 7. DETERMINATION OF LOCATION WITHIN AN AQUIFER PRO- TECTION ZONE. In determining the location of facilities within the zones depicted on the APA maps, the following rules shall apply: a. Facilities located wholly within an aquifer pro- tection zone shall be governed by the restrictions applicable to that zone. b. Facilities having parts lying within an APA or within more than one zone of an APA shall be governed by the restrictions applicable to the zone in which the largest portion of the facility is located. se5861/069/26 ♦ I c. Prior to the issuance of a Well Field Protection Operating Permit, the applicant shall file a statement with the appropriate county recording department to run with the property stating that development of the property is subject to land use limitations because it is located in an APA. This statement shall identify whether the property is in Zone 1 or Zone 2 of the APA. SECTION 8 . WELL FIELD PROTECTION ENFORCEMENT. • The City of Renton Public Works Department shall be the ad- ministering agency and shall have the• power and authority to administer and enforce the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 9 . TRANSFER OR ASSIGNMENT OF WELL FIELD PROTECTION OPERATING PERMITS. • In the event there is a change of ownership, a new lease, or an assignment of a lease, a sublease, or any other change in regard to the person owning the facility, the Department shall be notified. Upon payment of the appropriate fee and completion of processing of an application by the Depart- ment, the Well Field Protection Operating Permit shall be transferred. se5861/069/27 SECTION 10. WELL FIELD PROTECTION PERMIT FEES. Prior to the issuance of a new permit or an application for a special exemption, the owner shall pay a fee 'of Such fee shall be used to defray this cost of engineering review and issuance of the permit or exemption. Thereafter, all permit holders shall pay an annual renewal fee of . Such fee shall be used to defray the cost of moni- toring compliance with this ordinance. The fee for the • transfer of a permit shall be SECTION 11 . NOTICE OF VIOLATION. A. Whenever it is determined that there is a violation of this Ordinance, the notice of violation issued shall: a. Be in writing b. Be dated and signed by the authorized City of Ren- ton agent making the inspection c. Specify the violation or violations d. Specify the length of time available to correct the violation after receiving the notice of violation se5861/069/28 SECTION 12. INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. If any owner who stores, handles , uses, or produces regu- lated substances, without having obtained a Well Field Pro- tection Operating Permit as provided for herein or continues to operate in violation of the provisions of this Ordinance, then the City of Renton may file an action for injunctive relief in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. All costs incurred for abatement by the City ' of Renton, including reasonable attorney's fees, shall be paid by an owner operating without a well field operating permit or operating in violation of the provisions of the ordinance or permit. SECTION 13. OTHER LAWS, RULES, AND REGULATIONS. All owners within an APA must also comply with county, state, and federal laws, rules, and regulations related to the intent of this ordinance. SECTION 14. PENALTIES. SECTION 15. EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be 30 days after its enactment. se5861/069/29 I SECTION 16. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this ordinance or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the ordinance or the application of the provision to other per- sons or circumstances shall not be affected. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 1986. Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 1986. Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: se5861/069/30 It 2/23/87 JUN 1u 1987 • ORDINANCE NO. CITY OF RENTON klEARLNG EXAMINER SECTION 1: TITLE This ordinance shall be hereinafter known as the "Secondary Containment Ordinance", may be cited as such, will be hereinafter referred to as "this Ordinance", and same shall be and constitute Chapter , Title of Ordinance No. known as II . SECTION 2: PURPOSE AND INTENT A. Purpose. The �urpose of this Ordinance is to establish_ secondary containment and monitoring requirements for new underground storage `facilities—iihrah- store` regulated` 'substances including hazardous" erials, flammable liquids, toxic substances and combustible liquids. This Ordinance es - :lishes construction standards for new underground storage faciliti= tablishes separate monitoring standards for new and existing undergr, storage facilities, establishes uniform standards for release reporting, emergency response and abandonments; and specifies permit procedures. B. Intent. It is the intent of this ordinance to provide a method by which: 1. To safely store regulated substances including hazardous materials, flammable materials and combustible liquids in underground storage facilities; to trap and safely hold for recovery any regulated substance which may leak from underground storage facilities; 2. To provide a systematic means of monitoring to determine the presence of any leaked substance so that it may be safely recovered in a timely manner; 3. To provide a means to monitor existing underground storage facilities to detect leaks; 4. To protect groundwater resources; and 5. To protect the City of Renton's drinking water supply from impacts cause by leaks from underground storage facilities located within a City of Renton Aquifer Protection Area; 6. To reduce the fire and life safety hazards ass ociated with substances that might otherwise escape from a primary container. In addition to_ the, provision . of _this. article,_ all,..underground storage facilities installations_._shall,.._ meet._. .all applicable pyovisionsand requirements of—Articles 79 and 80 of the Uniform Fire Code. Ordinance No. Page 2 SECTION 3: APPLICABILITY A. Persons who own one or more underground storage facilities storing regulated substances (including hazardous substances, flammable liquids, toxic substances, and combustible liquids) shall comply with this Ordinance. If the operator of the underground storage facility is not the owner, then the owner shall enter into a written contract with the operator requiring the operator to: monitor the underground storage facility, maintain appropriate records; implement reporting procedures as required by the permit; and properly close the underground storage facility as required by the permit. B. All new underground storage facilities which store regulated substances must comply with the construction and monitoring standards for new underground storage facilities as set forth in this Ordinance. C. All existing underground storage facilities which store regulated substances must comply with the monitoring standards for existing underground facilities which are set forth in this Ordinance. However, existing underground storage facilities which meet the construction and monitoring standards for new facilities as set forth in the Ordinance may be issued permits and regulated pursuant to the standards and procedures for new facilities. D. All owners and/or operators of underground storage facilities which store regulated substances now, have stored regulated substances in the past, or have the ability to store regulated substances in the future must comply with the release reporting_ requirements, the. closure_requiremeotS_ and the permit application requirements as set forth in this Ordinance E. This Ordinance specifically excludes regulation .o.f_.the following types of underground�stoiageanTis %a - 1. Farm or,.residential tanks of 1,100 gallons or less capacity used ff storing motor fuel" for-noncommeiciehpurposes; except-for new- tank installations in the City's Aquifer Protection Area; t/ 2. Tanks used, for storing_heating oil for consumptive _use by__single family_ residences,4except for new tank: nstalla£ions in the City's - Aquifer Protection Area; 3. Septic tanks; 4. Storage tanks situated in an underground area (such as a basement, cellar, mineworking, drift, shaft or tunnel) if the storage tank is situated upon or above the surface of the floor; 5. Pipeline facility; 6. Surface impoundment, pit, pond or lagoon; ;. • . ' { Ordinance No. Page 3 7. Storm water or waste water collection system; 8. Flow-through process tanks; or 9. Liquid trap or associated gathering lines directly related to oil or gas production and gathering operations. SECTION 4: DEFINITIONS A. ABANDONMENT of underground storage facilities shall mean: (1) the relinquishment or termination or possession, ownership or control without full disclosure to the new owner thereof of containers, tanks, or pipes which have stored in the past or are currently storing regulated substances whether by vacating or by disposition thereof and shall not depend on a mere lapse of time; or (2) storage facilities which have been substantially emptied and unattended. B. AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA (APA) means the portion of an aquifer within the zone of capture of a well or well field owned or operated by the City of Renton, or the recharge-discharge area of any spring used for water supply by the City of Renton. C. CLOSURE OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE FACILITIES shall mean the lawful emptying and/or removal of underground storage facilities pursuant to a permit issued by the Fire Department and in conformance with Article 79 of the Uniform Fire Code. D. CONTINUOUS MONITORING means a system using automatic equipment which routinely performs the required monitoring on a periodic or cyclic basis throughout each day. E. DEPARTMENT means the City of Renton Fire Department F. _ DOUBLEy-WALLED means a container with two complete shells which provide -both ,..;:.:._�_„ _. ._�,,�__.. - - ...., Ito --'chp11'...T��� rnviflE both primary and secondary containment. The ..outer _structural support and must be constructed primarily of non-earthen materials including, but`not'"limited to,- concrete;'steel,and plastic r G. EXISTING UNDERGROUND STORAGE FACILITY means any underground storage facility that is not a new underground storage facility. The term includes any underground storage facility which has contained a hazardous substance in the past and, as of July 1, 1987, had the physical capability of being used again (it had not been removed or completely filled with an inert solid. H. LEAK DETECTIDhI_SYS.TEM means a system or technology capable of detecting, within 24 hours, the failura of either the primary- or secondary-containment structure Col) the presence of liquid in the secondary containment structure. • Ordinance No. Page 4 I. MEMBRANE LINER means any membrane sheet material fabricated into system or secondary containment. A membrane liner is placed external to a tank, in order to be an impermeable barrier between a primary containment device including pipes, and the ground. The membrane must provide a complete envelope that will t both,jla_jeral .and..,_v._ertical migration of the stored product out of the containment system and will to free of cracks and gaps. J. NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED INDEPENDENT TESTING ORGANIZATION means any one of the following organizations; or other organizations approved by the Fire Chief: American National Standards Institute (ANSI) American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE) National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) Underwriters Laboratories (UL) Underwriters Laboratories of Canada, Inc. (ULC) K. NEW UNDERGROUND STORAGE FACILITY means any underground storage facility subject to this Ordinance which is installed after the effective date of this Ordinance or which complies with the requirements of Section 5 of this Ordinance. L. OPERATOR means any person in control of, or having responsibility for, the daily operation of a storage facility. M. OWNER includes his duly authorized agent or attorney, a purchaser, devisee, fiduciary and a person having vested or contingent interest in the property in question. N. PRIMARY CONTAINMENT means a device (such as a tank, pipe, drum) and 'associated appurtenances which holds a regulated substance. 0. PRODUCT TIGHT means impervious to the substance which is contained, or is to be contained, so as to prevent the seepage of the substance from. the primary containment. To be product tight, the primary container shall not be subject to physical or chemical deterioration by the substance which it contains over the useful life of the tank. P. REGULATED SUBSTANCES shall mean any hazardous materials, flammable liquid, combustible liquid, or toxic substance which are more particularly defined as: 1. FLAMMABLE LIQUID is any liquid having a flash point below 100°F. and having a vapor pressure not exceeding 40 pounds per square inch (absolute) at 100°F. 2. COMBUSTIBLE LIQUID is a liquid having a flash point at or above 100°F. -- - Ordinance No. Page 5 3. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS shall include such materials as flammable solids, corrosive liquids, radioactive materials, oxidizing materials, highly toxic materials, poisonous gases, reactive materials, unstable materials, hypergolic materials and pyrophoric materials as defined in the Uniform Fire Code and any substance or mixture of substances which is an irritant, a strong sensitizer or which generates pressure through exposure to heat, decomposition or other means. 5. TOXIC SUBSTANCE shall mean any material, either singularly or in combination, which may pose a present or potential hazard to human health or to the quality of ground waters when improperly used, stored, transported or disposed of or otherwise mismanaged including fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides. Q. SECONDARY CONTAINMENT means a system which will completely collect and contain all primary containment spills and leaks, and contaminated precipitations, until appropriate remedial action can be determined. R. SINGLE-WALLED means a container with one shell in which regulated substances can or are being stored and which provides primary containment. S. UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE means any spilling, leaking, emitting, discharging, escaping, leaching, or disposing from an underground storage tank into ground water, surface water, or subsurface soils. Unauthorized release does not include intentional withdrawals of hazardous substances for the purpose of legitimate sale, use or disposal. T. UNDERGROUND STORAGE FACILITY means a tank, pipe, vessel or other container, or any combination of the foregoing, used or designed to be used for the underground storage or underground transmission of regulated substances and the volume of which (including the volume of the underground pipes connected thereto) is 10 percent or more beneath the surface of the ground. The underground storage facilities include but are not limited to line leak detectors, monitoring wells, continuous automatic leak detection systems, and secondary containment systems associated therewith. SECTION 5: NEW UNDERGROUND STORAGE TAM( CONSTRUCTION AND MONITORING STANDARDS The following subsections shall apply to all primary and secondary containers including leak interception and detection systems. A. Standards for New Underground Storage Facilities 1. Primary and secondary levels of containment shall be required for all new underground storage facilities used for the storage of regulated substances. Ordinance No. Page 6 ' , 2. All primary containers shall be product-tight and shall be installed in accordance with all applicable sections of the Uniform Fire Code. 3. All secondary containers shall be constructed of materials of sufficient thickness, density, and composition to prevent structural weakening of the secondary container as a result of contact with any released hazardous substance and shall be capable of containing any unauthorized release of the hazardous substance stored within the • primary container(s) for at least the maximum anticipated period sufficient to allow detection and removal of the unauthorized release. 4. If a hazardous substance has come into contact with the secondary • container and either additional primary containers exist within the secondary container or the leaking primary container has been closed as specified in this Ordinance and replaced by a new primary • container, the owner shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Department that the requirements of Subsection 6.B.3 of this ordinance are still achievable or replace the secondary container. • 5. The secondary container _shall.have__the ....ability .to---contain_ the., following volumes: a. At least 110 Gpercent_,pfr,the „volume of the primary container where o �_one_primry a container mis `aiitliih--the'_secondary . on c ainer. _ b. In the case of multiple_ primary containers within a single secondary container, the secondary container shall be large ,_1 enough to contain_ 50.,..,percent o the volume-�of the ._largest _ primary container _placed_.,tn, it, or-10 percent of the aggregate -xn-terriar volume of all primary -cbn-tainers—in-'"-the`-secondary container, whichever is greater. 6. If the secondary container is open to, rainfall, then it shall be able to accommodate the volume of precipitation which could enter the secondary container during a 24-hour,v. 100.-year storm in addition to the volume of hazardous, s_ubstance storage required in Subsection 6.B.5 of this Ordinace. a " 7. The volumetric requirements_ for_the,,_.pore space o� , ,a_ gran_u_lar matera.al placed-- in the secondary container as backfill for the „primary container s afl be equal to or greate"than that required in o"•_- - Section`6.B.5 )3f this Ordinance. The available pore space in the secondary container backfill shall be determined using appropriate engineering methods and safety factors and shall consider the • specific retention and specific yield of the backfill material, the location of the primary container within the secondary container, and the proposed method of operation for the secondary container. • 8. The secondary container shall be equipped with a collec ion system,., to accumulate. _temporarily` -``store, "and permitremoval . of any precipitation, subsurface i'n filtration, \\or hazardous .%substance released from the primary container. ' Ordinance No. Page 7 • 9. ,Lam natprt, coated. _.ez....clady_ymaterials_shalt, be _.cors.idered single . .,.t.Q,...,fu walled and shall not be construed fill,the_requirements of both primary and secondary containment. 10. All primary _,.c_Q.rttainers_yand.,double,-wailed.._underground„_storage.„..tanks _subjeet.._to..-.floatation shall,;be_we gated or . anchored, using methods specified by the manufacturer or, if non exist, best engineering judgement. • B. Design Standards for Primary Containers and Double-Walled Underground Storage Tanks 1. ,Cathodically_protected steel underground storage tanks, _�steelJ underground storage tanki clad with Glass fibre-reinforced plastic, and glass fibre plastic underground storage tans�" '1shall -be fabricated andY designed'`to standards developed by a nationally recognized independent testing organization or be listed by the testing organization. 2. Underground storage tanks shall be tested by the manufacturer or an- independent testing organization for durability and chemical _ compatibility with the regulated substances to be stored using recognized eng neerin ii g practices formaferials testing. 3. ` Except for steel underground storage tanks a, wear plate (striker plate shall 5e�` errtrereci""under''all.,,-a ,ccble.essi _,opegings_..of,._the n e.urground storage..tank. Tlie nlateshal t be constructed of stee]. or, if the steel is not compatible with the regulated-_substance stored, a material resistant to the stored regulated substance. T_he width of the plate shall be at least 9 inches wide and have an area of 1 square-foot or be~ ,equal to,,,tf1e"area of`theTaccessibl2 peeing or quide_tube...:.xhichever._..is ,a,larger, The thickness of• the steel plate shall be at least 0.053 inch (1.35 mm), and those constructed of other materials (as required) shall be of sufficient thickness to provide equivalent protection. The plate shall be rolled to the contours of underground storage tank and bonded ,or_._..seam welded in place. s.....- �..� __. ._ ._ ,... .. . U. ,... 4. Single-walled primary containers of steel and the outer surface of double-walled underground storage tanks constructed of steel which are not clad with glass fiber reinforced plastic, shall be protected • by a properly installed,—maintained.,„q,and monitored cathodic protection- system. Selection of the type of`paitection employed-then-tie-based on a certification listing by a nationally recognized independent testing organization or the judgment of a registered corrosion engineer or a National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE) accredited corrosion specialist taking,into account the corrosion history_of the area. Underground storage tanks. With hs e `cor`ros on"` resistant" materials, non-metalic glass fiber reinforced plastic coatings,composites, or equivalent systems shall be holiday tested immediately prior to installation. "� " "` Ordinance No. Page 8 a. The protection system shall be inspected under the direction of a registered corrosion engineer or NACE corrosion specialist at the frequency specified in the certification or in accordance with the schedule prescribed by the system designer, but no less than semi-annually. b. Underground storage tanks _in, a vault and ..not,.backfilled_are exempted from the requirments_of this_sdbsection— • 5. All primary containers and double-walled underground storage tanks shall be installed agcordinq to the___manufacturer!s__ ywritten mmendations or, if no written recommendations exist, best engineering practice. 6. All underground__storage. tanksz._shall, be_etested,_.begore._ being`put,.into,r _sera zi n accordance with the applicable sections of the Code under which they were built. The ASME code stamp or Listing Mark of Underwriters Laboratories, Incorporated, (UL) or any other nationally recognized independent testing organization shall be evidence of compliance with this requirement. 7. Before being covered, enclosed, or placed in use, allundergrQund, star Qe tanks and _piping_ shall be tested for_„ tig�htness� ydrostatically or with air �ressure at_no_t less than 3_,_ppunds,..per s quare-.incb---(20.68 k Pa) and not more than 5 pounds per square-inch (34.48 k Pa). pressure piping-,_shall, be_ hydrostatically,,testedto ' 150 percent of the maximum anticipated _pressure of the system, or pn m ically tested r to 111 percent of they maximum anticipated pressure of the system, but not less than 5 pounds per squre inch (34.48 kPa) guage at the highest point of the system. This test shalL,.._.be.--maintained._ for_a._.sufficient.-time-to—cnmplete,Y,._,visuel .inspection .__._ of all o_ints,,and„"_copnections, but for at.. least 10 , minutes._ In lieu of the above, a test using^ accepted engineering practices shall be used. Double-walled underground storage tanks are exempt from the requirements of this section provided that the annular space is monitored using either pressure or vacuum testing. 8. All underground .storage,__tanks,,,. shall be equipped with an overfloww, protection system which includes the following a. A spill catchment basin which surrounds the fill pipe . and prevents the inflow of the hazardoussubstance" into the , subsurface environment. A level sensing device that on Cti uogAly j onitors Tand__ indicates -the"Iiquidd leveE In the underground storage tank ,and either(b) or (c) of this subsection or both.;_ ' b audible_/visul.,_alarm system _triggered by a liquid level s f--to al t the operatoi "of an impending overfill conditio , c. An automatic shut-off device that stops the flow of product being delivered to the underground storage tank when the underground storage tank is full. Ordinance No. Page 9 C. Standards for Secondary Containers Including Leak Interception and Detection Systems 1. The secondary container shall, at a minimum, encompass the area within the`system rof-vertitar"planes surrounding the exterior f o the primary cantonmnt_unit- e . If _backfi is placed- between the primary" and secondary containment, then an evaluation shall be made of the maximum lateral spread of a point leak from the primary containment over the vertical distance between the primary and secondary containment. The secondary containment shall extend an additional distance beyond the vertical planes described above equal to the radius of lateral spread plus 1 foot. 2. The secondary container must be capable of precluding the., inflow__of t e ig esround water ant-icipatedr during._.the life of the 'rmderground-storage-tank--into the space between the primary and secondary containers. 3. If the space between the primary and secondary containers is backfilled, the backfill material shall not preclude the vertical) movement of leakage from any part of the primary container. 4. The secondary. container .,and .any backfili material_._ between_ the; primary and secondary containers shall be designed and constructed to' promote gravity drainage of a leak of regulated substances from .any part of_the_Primary container to the monitoringlocations(s). 5. Two or more primary containers shall not utilize the same secondary confiinei if the,_ primary containers_ _star_„s.,materials__,.t �,_�hati.n_ combination may cause_a fire or explosion; or the production of a , "flammable, ^ toxic, or poisonous`gas;_._or' the----deterioration-of a primary dr"secondary" container. - 6. Drainage of liquid from within - a _s__econ_dary,__container_ shall- be �ontrrolled in a manner-approved Yby the Fire Marshall -ec a.a to _preyen .regulated--materials_from_being_discharged.„ The liquid shall be analyzed to,- determine the_ presence^_o.f,...any of.-,the regulated_- __sufiifance(!)�,LL stored in the primary container prior` fir initial removal and monthly thereafter for any continuous discharge (removal) to determine the appropriate method for final disposal. The liquid shall be sampled and analyzed immediately upon an indication of an unauthorized release from the primary container. 7. For primary containers...installed completely__ beneath the ground " surface, the original __excavation -for the _secondary container Shalt- _ a water-tight cover which, .extends_- at.._.least, 1- foot beyond each- `boun'dary of the_ original,' excavation. This cover shall -be .asphalt, reinforced concrete, .or equivalent material which is sloped to drainways_, eading away,..from the excavation". access openings_;_shall "`be constructed__ as,.._-_,water-tight_,._,,as __ ,Practical. Double-walled underground storage �_tanksand open vaults are exemp ram the requirements of this subsection. • • Ordinance No. Page 10 8. The actual lacat.ion and__orientation of the underground storage tanks and appurtenant piping systems shall _ be indicated on,,,_as-built drawin s of the facility. Copies of all drawings, photographs, and p ans sha 1 be submitted to the Fire Department. 9. The floor._of. the secondary._container_shall_.be. .constructed_.on._a..firm `base and, if necessary for µmonitoring,_Tshall_ be.._sloped ..tna ,collection sump. One„or •more._ access casings... sha.11, bem_installed_in the sump an`cf 1zed to allow removal of collected liquid. The access case g shirr extend-toy the` °_ground perforated„in the" re ierof—ffie su _9_____ _. ___, ___,_,___mp,, and,_ covered:_with _a locked waterproof cap. If ' this access casing is within a secured facility, the requirements for a locked cap may be waived by the Fire Marshall. The casing shall be thick enough to withstand all anticipated stresses with appropriate engineering safety factors and constructed of materials that will not be structurally weakened by the stored hazardous substance and will not donate, capture, or mask constitutents for which analyses will be made. 10. Systems for secondary__ containment utilizing,:_membrane liners shall meef tfie following requirements: "�' "°-ry a. The membrane liner shall have a._p_ermeahn;ty_ factory. of 0.25 ounces per square foot,per 24;_hours or_less, Such permeability `ihalF constitutethe maximum rate of transport over time of the hazardous substance proposed for storage. Permeability shall : be evaluated according to accepted engineering practices for ' materials testing. b. The membrane liner shall be considered to have satisfied the requi ants or-this Ordinance only if the liner material meats the following standards. The material properties specified in these standards"shall be determineed using accepted engineering practices for materials testing. 1. The volume swelL after a 24-hour period of immersion in the stored hazardous substance shall not exceed-3-percent of the original liner membrane material thickness. 2. The maximum change in elongation of the liner membrane material at break after 24 hours of immersion in the stored hazardous substance shall not exceed 2 percent of the original elongation. 3. The liner membrane material Shore,,A.,,hardness (brittleness) after-"24 hours of immersion in the regulated substance shall be within 5_percent of the original hardness. 4. For a containment test, the rate of transport through the lin mem6Tane materisr of the regulated substance after a period of 24 hours shall not exceed 6 percent by weight of the regulated substance being tested. The liquid height for the test shall be no greater than that expected in actual site conditions. • Ordinance No. Page 11 5. The rate of solubility of the liner membrane material in the regu a ed substance for a .period of 24 hours shall not exceed 0.1 percent by weight of the section of liner being tested. c. The liner _seam strength,.,shall be_..equal:-,,to the,tensile._strength. _. of the- parent,material when tested in accordance with accepted . engineering practices -for materials testing. 11. The liner shah be . installed under,the supervision of a , represenfi ive__of the membrane.-_liner fabricator or a contractor certified by such fabricator. 12. The . excavation base and walls for the synthetic liner shall be prepared to the_liner fabricator'sspecificationsand shall be+fiim "" smooth, andof a free ny sharp objects or protrusions. �''" 13. The design ,of,. .double-walled_ underground storage tanks shall allow for monitoring of the annular space. -" 14. "Sticking!! the annular space of a double-walled underground storage tank as a monitoring method shall not be allowed unless a strike plate or other approved devices used to. protect the underground storage tank are located directly under the monitoring opening. 15. The double-walled underground storage tank shall be_ so designed and us. installed that- any loss raf�_hazardo ._substance.. from,...vthe. rimar y container will , drain, to-..ra"�specific_ location within the annular space, as required, to�be detected by a monitoring device or method. 16. Any special accessories, fitting, coating, or lining not . inherent within the initial design of the primary container or double-walled underground storage tank shall be approved by a nationally recognized, independent testing organization or a demonstration of integrity with the primary container or double-walled underground storage tank shall be required. D. Monitoring Standards for New Underground Storage Facilities 1. The owners or operators of all new underground storage facilites shall implement a monitoring program that is approved by the Department and required as a condition of the permit. Visual monitoring must be implemented unless it is determined by the Department to be infeasible to visually monitor. 2. All monitoring programs shall include the following: a. A written routiJ.e _monitoring._ procedure which includes, when 8, ap iE 5ie: the frequency of performing the monitoring method, the methods and equipment to be used for performing the monitoring, the location(s) from which the monitoring will be performed, the name(s) or title(s) .of the person(s) responsible for performing the monitoring and/or maintaining the equipment, and the reporting format. Ordinance No. Page 12 ( E. Response Plan for New Underground Storage Facilities 1. A response plaii shall be developed by the permit applicant which demonstrates, to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshall, that any unauthorized release will be removed from the secondary container within the shortest possible time and no longer than the time consistent with the ability of the secondary container to contain the regulated substance. This response plan shall be a condition of the underground storage facility permit. The response plan shall • include, but is not limited to the following: a. A description of the proposed methods and equipment to be used for removing the hazardous substance, including the location and availability of the required equipment, if not permanently on-site, and an equipment maintenance schedule for the equipment located on-site. b. The name(s) or title(s) of the person(s) responsible for authorizing the work to be performed. SECTION 6: EXISTING INSTALLATIONS A. Any underground storage facility in existence as of the effective date of this ordinance, or for which an installation permit has been obtained prior to the effective date of this ordinance, shall be allowed to continue in use, so long as it is product tight. B. Should any existing storage tank and/or its associated piping experience a loss of product, due to leakage or mechanical failure, the entire underground storage facility shall be upgraded to meet the requirements for a new underground storage facility as set forth in this Ordinance. SECTION 7: EXISTING UNDERGROUND STORAGE FACILITY MONITORING STANDARDS A. All owners of existing underground storage facilities which store regulated substances subject to this Ordinace shall implement a visual monitoring or alternative monitoring system that complies with this Ordinance and is approved by the Fire Marshall within 18 months of the effective date of this Ordinance. 1. The monitoring system must be capable of: determining the containment ability of the underground storage tank and detecting any active or future unauthorized releases. 2. If the monitoring technique(s) selected is designed to detect the presence of the stored regulated substance outside of the underground storage facility, then tests must be made to determine if the regulated substance or any interfering constituents exist in the soil or backfill surrounding the underground storage facility. Ordinance No. Page 13 3. The failure to implement an approved monitoring system shall be cause for the Fire Chief to require closure of the underground storage facility pursuant to Section 11 of this Ordinance. B. The objective of the monitoring program for existing underground storage facilities is to detect unauthorized releases within 72 hours of their occurrence. Ground water monitoring may be utilized as a primary means of monitoring only when the underground storage facility is located outside of an Aquifer Protection Area. C. The Fire Department shall review the proposed monitoring program and shall approve the monitoring system if it finds that all aspects of the monitoring alternative can be implemented. If the proposed monitoring alternative cannot be approved, then the Fire Department may request the submittal of another proposed monitoring alternative or may specify the implementation of another monitoring alternative. D. All owners of existing underground storage facilities subject to this Ordinance who are not able to implement visual monitoring shall implement one of the following monitoring alternatives in conformance with any permit requirements imposed by the Fire Marshall: 1. Underground Storage Tank Testing 2. Vapor or Other Vadose Zone Monitoring and Ground Water Monitoring with Soil Sampling 3. Vadose Zone Monitoring, Soil Sampling, and Underground Storage Tank Testing. 4. Ground Water and Soil Testing 5. Inventory Reconciliation, Underground Storage Tank Testing, and Pipeline Leak Detectors 6. Inventory Reconciliation, Underground Storage Tank Testing, Pipieline Leak Detectors, VAdose Zone, or Ground Wate Monitoring and Soil Testing 7. Underground Storage tank Gauging and Testing. 8. Interim Monitoring E. The Fire Marshall shall evaluate each monitoring alternative proposed by the applicant for a permit to determine its suitability based on the following criteria: 1. Whenever possible, a primary method of monitoring other than ground water monitoring shall be performed, weekly at a minimum. 2. When the underground storage facility is in an Aquifer Protection Area, a monitoring method other than ground water monitoring shall be utilized on a monthly or more frequent basis for leak detection monitoring. Ordinance No. Page 14 3. Ground water monitoring may be required by the Fire Chief or his designee in an Aquifer Protection Area. The Fire Marshall shall review and approve the number and location of the monitoring well(s). More than 1 underground storage facility may be monitored using the same well provided the well is directly downgradient of all underground storage facilities being monitored and is within 1,000 feet of all underground storage facilities being monitored. SECTION 8: PERMITS A. No person, persons, corporation or other legal entities, shall install or operate a primary or secondary storage facility without first obtaining a permit to do so from the Fire Marshall. B. The Fire Marshall shall not issue a permit to install or operate a primary or secondary underground storage facility unless adequate plans, specifications, test data, and/or other appropriate information have been submitted by the owner and/or operator showing that the proposed design and construction of the facility meet the intent and provisions of this Ordinance. C. No person, persons, corporation or other legal entities shall temporarily or permanently abandon a primary or secondary storage facility. D. No person, persons, corporation or other legal entities shall close a primary or secondary underground storage facility without first obtaining a permit to do so from the Fire Marshall. The Fire Marshall shall not issue a permit to temporarily or permanently close a primary or secondary underground storage facility unless adequate plans and specifications and other appropriate information have been submitted by the applicant showing that the proposed closure meets the intent and provisions of this Ordinance. E. The application for a permit pursuant to this Ordinance shall be accompanied by the fee set by the Fire Department. SECTION 9: PERMIT CONDITIONS A. As a condition of any permit to operate an underground storage facility, the permittee shall report to the Department within 30 days after any changes in the usage of any underground storage tank, including: 1. The storage of new hazardous substances; 2. Changes in monitoring procedure; or 3. The replacement or repair of all or part of any underground storage facility. • Ordinance No. Page 15 ( B. As a condition on any permit to operate an underground storage facility, the permittee shall report to the Department within 72 hours any replacement or repair of all or part of any underground storage facility. r- 4. C. As a condition any permit to operate an underground storage facility, the permittee all report to the Department any unauthorized release occurren e, thin 24 hours of its detection, using the procedures required in this Ordinance. D. Written records of all monitoring performed shall be maintained on-site by the operator for a period of at least 3 years from the date the monitoring was performed. The Fire Department may require the submittal of the monitoring records or a summary at a frequency that they may establish. The written records of all monitoring performed in the past 3 years shall be shown to the Department or duly authorized representative upon demand during any site inspection. Monitoring records shall include: 1. The date and time of all monitoring or sampling; 2. Monitoring equipment calibration and maintenance records; 3. The results of any visual observations; 4. The results of all sample analysis performed in the laboratory or in the field, including laboratory data sheets; 5. The logs of all readings of gauges or other monitoring equipment, ground water elevations, or other test results; and 6. The results of inventory readings and reconciliations. E. A permit to operate issued by the Fire Marshall shall be effective for 1 year. The Fire Marshall shall not issue a permit to operate an underground storage facility until the Department inspects the underground storage facility and determines that the underground storage facility complies with the provisions of these regulations. The underground storage facility owner shall apply to the Department for permit renewal at least 60 days prior to the expiration of the permit. F. Permits may be transferred to a new underground storage facility owner if the new underground storage facility owner does not change any conditions of the permit, the transfer is registered with the Department within 30 days of the change in ownership, and any necessary modifications are made • to the information in the initial permit application due to the change in ownership. The Fire Marshall may review, modify, or terminate the permit to operate the underground storage facility upon receiving the ownership transfer request. G. The Fire Marshall shall not renew an underground storage facility permit unless the underground storage facility has been inspected within the prior 3 years and the inspection revealed that the underground storage facility complied with this Ordinance, as applicable, and with all • Ordinance No. Page 16 existing permit conditions. The inspection shall be conducted by the Fire Department. If the inspection reveals noncompliance, then the Department must verify by a follow-up inspection that all required corrections have been implemented before renewing the permit. H. Within 30 days of receiving an inspection report from the Department the permit holder shall file with the Department a plan and time schedule to implement any required modifications to the underground storage facility or to the monitoring plan needed to achieve compliance with the intent of this Ordinance or the permit conditions. This plan and time schedule shall also implement all of the recommendations of the Department. SECTION 10: RELEASE REPORTING REQUIREhENTS� _.�. A. All unauthorized releases from the primary or secondary container shall be reported to the Fire Department according to the provisions of this Section. 1. All unauthorized releases to secondary containers shall be recorded . on the operator's monitoring reports. Such an unauthorized release shall be determined to be "an unauthorized release requiring reporting" if the leak detection monitoring system in the space between the primary and secondary containers can be reactivated within 8 hours. This provision shall be applicable only to new underground storage tanks. 2. All other unauthorized releases shall be reported pursuant to the provisions of an "Unauthorized release requiring reporting" within 24 hours after the release has been, or should have been, detected. B. Unauthorized Releases Requiring Recording shall by reported to the Fire Department within 5 days of the occurrence. An unauthorized release requiring recording is one in which the leak detection monitoring system in the space between the primary and secondary container could be reactivated within 8 hours. 1. The incident report shall be accompanied by a written record including the following information: a. List of type, quantities, and concentration of hazardous substances released. b. Method of cleanup. c. Method and location of disposal of the released hazardous substances (indicate whether a hazardous waste manifest(s) is utilized). d. Method of future leak prevention or repair. If this involves a change in operation, monitoring or management, then appropriate reports shall also be filed and a new permit applied for. is Ordinance No. Page 17 e. If the primary container is to continue to be used, then a description of how the monitoring system between the primary and secondary container has been re-activated. f. Facility operator's name and telephone number. g. The approximate costs for cleanup to be submitted voluntarily. 2. The Department shall review the information submitted pursuant to the report of an Unauthorized Release Requiring Recording, shall review the permit and may inspect the underground storage facility. The Department shall find that the containment and monitoring standards of this Ordinance can continue to be achieved or the Department shall revoke the permit until appropriate modifications are made to allow compliance with the standards. 3. Deterioration of the secondary container is likely when any of the following conditions exist: a. The secondary container will have some loss of integrity due to contact with the stored hazardous substances; b. The mechanical means used to cleanup the released hazardous substance could damage the secondary container; or C c. Hazardous substances, other than those stored in the primary container, are added to the secondary container for treatment • or neutralization of the released hazardous substance as part of the cleanup process. 4. If a recordable unauthorized release becomes a reportable unauthorized release due to initially unanticipated facts, the release shall immediately be treated as a reportable release. C. Unauthorized Release Requiring Reporting 1. Within 24 hours after an unauthorized release has been detected, or should have been detected, using required monitoring, the operator shall notify the Fire Department. This section shall apply to any unauthorized release except as defined in Section 10.B. 2. Within 5 working days of detecting the release, the operator or permittee shall submit to the Department a full written report to include all of the following information which is known at the time of filing the report: a. List of type, quantity, and concentration of regulated substances released. b. The results of all investigations completed at that time to determine the extent of soil or ground water or surface water contamination due to the release. Ordinance No. Page 18 c. Method of cleanup implemented to date, proposed cleanup actions, and approximate cost of actions taken to date. d. Method and location of disposal of the released regulated substance and any contaminated soils or ground water or surface water. e. Proposed method of repair or replacement of the primary and secondary containers. f. Facility operator's name and telephone number. 3. Until cleanup is complete, the operator or permittee shall submit reports to the Department every month or at a more frequent interval specified by the Department. The reports shall include the information requested in this Ordinance. SECTION 11: CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS A. General Provisions 1. All closures shall be accomplished in conformance with Article 79 of the Uniform Fire Code and with the provisions of this Ordinance. 2. Underground storage facilities temporarily taken out of service for �' a period of up to 90 days shall continue to be monitored in conformance with the applicable sections of this Ordinance. 3. The temporary closure requirements of this Ordinance shall apply to those underground storage facilities in which the storage of regulated substances has ceased for a period of more than 90 days, but less than 365 days and where the underground storage facility owner or operator proposes to retain the ability to use the underground storage facility within 1 year for the storage of regulated substances. This section does not apply to underground storage facilities that are empty as a result of the withdrawal of all stored material during normal operating practice prior to the planned input of additional regulated substances consistent with permit conditions. 4. The permanent closure requirements of this Ordinance shall apply to those underground storage facilities in which the storage of regulated substances has ceased for a period of more than 365 days or when the owner has no intent within the next year to use the underground storage facility for storage of regulated substances. 5. The requirements of this section do not apply to those underground storage facilities in which regulated substances are continued to be stored even through there is no use being made of the stored substance. In these cases, the applicable containment and monitoring requirements of this Ordinance shall continue to apply. • (Ordinance No. - Page 19 6. During the period of time between cessation of regulated substance storage and actual completion of underground storage facility closure, the applicable containment and monitoring requirements of this Ordinance shall continue to apply. 7. Prior to closure, the underground storage facility owner shall submit to the Department a proposal describing how the owner intends to comply with closure requirements. The requirement for prior submittal is waived if the storage of regulated substances ceases as a result of an unauthorized release or to prevent or minimize the effects of an unauthorized release. In this situation, the underground storage facility owner shall submit the required proposal within 14 days of either the discovery of an unauthorized release or the implementation of actions taken to prevent or minimize the effects of the unauthorized release. 8. Existing underground storage facilities which have experienced an unauthorized release may not be repaired and must be permanently closed pursuant to the requirements of this section. B. Temporary Closure 1. This section applies to those underground storage facilities in which storage has ceased for a period of more than 90 days and less than 365 days and where the owner or operator proposes to retain the ability to use the underground storage facility within a year for the storage of regulated substances. 2. The owner or operator shall comply with all of the following: a. All residual liquid, solids, or sludges shall be removed and handled pursuant to the requirements of the Fire Marshall. b. If the underground storage facility contained a regulated substance that could produce flammable vapors at standard temperature and pressue, then the underground storage facility, either in part or as a whole, shall be purged of the flammable vapors to levels that would preclude an explosion or such lower levels as may be required by the Fire Marshall. c. The underground storage tank may be filled with a noncorrosive liquid that is not a regulated substance. This liquid must be tested and results submitted to the Department prior to its being removed from the underground storage facility at the end of the temporary closure period. d. Except for required venting, all fill and access locations and piping shall be sealed utilizing locked caps or concrete plugs. e. Power service shall be disconnected from all pumps associated with the use of the underground storage tank except if the pump services some other equipment which is not being closed. , Ordinance No. Page 20 2. The monitoring required pursuant to the permit may be modified or eliminated during the temporary closure period by the Department. The Department shall consider, in making the above decision, the need to maintain monitoring in order to detect unauthorized releases that may have occurred during the time the underground storage facility was used but that have not yet reached the monitoring locations and been detected. 3. The underground storage facility shall be inspected by the owner or operator at least once every 3 months to assure that the temporary closure actions are still in place. This shall include: a. Visual inspection of all locked caps and concrete plugs. b. If locked caps are utilized, then at least one shall be removed to determine if any liquids or other substances have been added to the underground storage tank or if there has been a change in the quantity or type of liquid added pursuant to the above Section. C. Permanent Closure Requirements 1. Owners of underground storage facilities subject to permanent closure shall comply with all the provisions of this Ordinance. An underground storage facility may be permanently closed by either (a) removal; or (b) closure in place. It is not required that all portions of a facility be permanently closed in the same manner. However, all actions shall comply with the appropriate portions of this section. 2. Owners of underground storage facilities proposing to permanently close the facility by removal shall comply with the following requirements: a. All residual liquid, solids, or sludges shall be removed. b. If the underground storage facility contained a regulated substance that could produce flammable vapors at standard temperature and pressure, then the underground storage facility, either in part or as a while, shall be purged of the flammable vapors to levels that would preclude explosion or such lower levels as may be required by the Department. c. When an underground storage facility or any part of an underground storage facility is to be disposed of, the owner must document to the Department that proper disposal has been completed. d. An owner of an underground storage facility or any part of an underground storage facility that is destined for a specific reuse shall identify to the Department the future underground storage facility owner, operator, location of use, and nature of use. i Ordinance No. Page 21 e. An owner of an underground storage facility or any part of an underground storage facility that is destined for reuse as scrap material shall identify this reuse to the Department. 3. Owners of underground storage facilities who propose to permanently close a facility in place shall comply with the following: a. All residual liquid, solids, or sludges shall be removed. b. All piping associated with the underground storage tank shall be removed and disposed of unless removal might damage structures or other pipes that are being used and that are contained in a common trench, in which case the piping to be closed shall be emptied of all contents and capped. c. The underground storage tank, except for the piping that is. closed pursuant to the above section, shall be completely filled with an inert solid, unless the owner intends to use the underground storage tank for the storage of a non-regulated substance which is compatible with the previous use of the underground storage facility. d. A notice shall be placed in the deed to the property and recorded with the appropriate agency. The notice shall describe the exact vertical and areal location of the closed underground storage facility, the regulated substance it contained, and the closure method. 5. The owner of an underground storage facility being closed shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief that no unauthorized release has occurred. This demonstration can be based on the ongoing leak detection monitoring, ground water monitoring, or soils sampling performed during or immediately after closure activities. If feasible, soil samples shall be taken and analyzed according to the following: a. If the underground storage facility or any protion thereof is removed, then soil samples from the soils immediately beneath the removed portions shall be taken. A separate sample shall be taken for every 200 square-feet for underground storage tanks or every 20 lineal-feet of trench for piping, at a minimum. b. Soils shall be analyzed for all constituents of the previously stored regulated substances and their breakdown or transformation products. D. The detection of any unauthorized release shall require compliance with the reporting requirements of this Ordinance. H'K=4 LUr tU JS:I U(.! r'ik N `" k Jun Ur I wu t cnna. -,OCATION : LOCATED AT 601 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH. 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 10/15/86 El ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ® POLICE DEPARTMENT a _ POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS: :OMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED 0N WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 3Y 5:00 P.M. ON OCTOBER 9 a 1986 • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : T70 /4 /` 11 APPROVED1210;;;OVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Grp - s , 1531° r DATE: ///7/`I7"? ';IGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR 'AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 "i MEMORANDUM DICK HOUGHTON, DIRECTOR, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Date 5/21/87 Tol From HEARING EXAMINER'S OFFICE Subject Verification of Legal Description MOBIL OIL CORPORATION Would you please have the attached legal description checked so we can put together Restrictive Covenants for Mobil ,Oil Corporation. The property is located at the SW corner of NE Sunset Blvd. and NE 12th Street. We would appreciate this information as soon as possible (as usual) . Thanks Dick! ! - — ��j ,446,—OL Legal description of property (If more space is required, attach a separate sheet). Tract lla. which is a portion of Block 11 of corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, as per plat recorded in Volume 57 of plats, pages 92 through 98, Records of King County, except the North 25 feet con ecl to the City of Renton by instrument recorded under Recording No. 5005388 ) for road; and except those portions conveyed to the State of Washington by lirinstrument recorded under Recording No�72022501933" or road; Situate in the City of Renton, County of--riirg Washington. AFFIDAVIT • iA , being duly sworn, declare that I am El authorized representative to act for the property owner,E3owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCR 'ZED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS O3 DAY OF —4Z�t< ,l1Lat , ,o VL / c c t' up • Ct ./ / / oF , v v�'l cc‘ 2 ttif 7 {�i / 'c^ 11/ f0 / v, I tn. CI / 1 '�s . �s 1 I i 0 i • ' 8 �� ,r o tG m c1 ; m, I�, -� Q f1 • O C4 C1 co N �'� • �,1vs(1, mt zt1 h I I V ft i�1 1 01 I NI <3 - • Sir\ tn }r. I I 89•G - -—— — �ASi zz'9// / - �91Z► E `q ° I I �4 � � 4aU 9 -- CC I y s �s � ZOZ0 'A St, 6s,89y , .00 I-• r 7�•9sz s �, o M �, 18 a �/�d �� — In o8/S/ O N t z•[sz /4..r*.6s_9s;V I o•os 7SQQ:6' ' 1 ,/ I Fes.£ I , 0co 0 to kg l',. N :CC; ,/ �:s•o/ r� of/ in a 0 0 a Ia 0 Q 0s ^ r ' Illk I.,j ,, 441- corn O, o, o i S'8o/ I, 'C N CO o o. ONO ° C 3 0 p \ qi 0 0 z'„/ m o m o. a I Ni N N o \ 0 Q o 0- 0` n �^ (N: L 2'/S/ \ o•oo/ *£ f// '^ V./ q41 o Nro o/ 69z : -'Dl,zs.88•S N _ 0-- _ _zz'/8/ if/ ail b' ; E'l - h kgi t/•9L 0:SL— 0;So/ L8'6o/ -1 I n \` N 41 AVM.3 7yi'f' I 1 7 `� f �`388 _ 500��� . 0--�� o v RECoRDE0- ' , �W1 (•Ud , 9 • 'VO^ 6 el PAGE i) W 4 PAGE ...-.52R... REOUE ri' TM �nffl�itLE�`•,�t�5',fJ;F�:A�N�;��C-OM�?ANY� C� k_____... H-...---"'l y� Deeds 1 'N 0 11959 LIAR 9 A I e 3 0 CY; 4 ,,,,........:, o , „.1. 4,,,...., ri, nx m �. T . H° \° `6`+. 14 , t�I BER 4 ORRIS AUDITOR . ,.. .. �a �, `'R' ;, i• I�'PJ WasH. 9 f `y U O l�rtiP ,-•.. r v R1-4 • • al ? w- 0 `� C.9 F�O U'.1 ‘i (7.:A / . *Fs' :-.0 o ctr i' Form 468-C-Rev. Quit Claim Deed `.;( .t (CORPORATE FORM) THE GRANTOR, GREATER RENTON SHOPPING CENTERS',. INC.,. a Washington Corporation, ' for and in consideration of ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, conveys and quit claims to THE CITY .OF RENTON, a Municipal .corporation, the following described real estate, situated in the County of King State of Washington, together with all after acquired title of the grantor(s) therein: The North twenty-five (25) feet of Tract 11-A which is a portion of 'Block 11, ,Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, according. to plat recorded in Volume 57 of Plats, page 92, in King County, ;Washington. • . >�."i.�... ;.. - . • _.Ilt.t S THEREOF, said corporation has caused this instrument to be executed by its proper officers arid,{tlycArle te.,�ea tdibe hereunto affixed this 30th day of •January ,19 59. • `.;/, -','`�' ,.., `,, +' -_GREA.TER_-REITON__SHOPPING_-CEHTERS;:_.IIIC.. �.4 o .. .-vvf' "I\a a BY ' - Cf%-4"4.4,4 li,..•,\.„/".‘,,...,21 . :,'.-.;:•-, . Lt-A.—*---4-1, i .. ._ 4111 r•ic Secretary. STATE OF WASHINGTON, , ss. , County of King On this 30th day of January ,19 59 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared WILLIAM J. O'NEIL and GERARD M. SHELLAN to me knowq,toatkt ithe Vice-- President and Secretary, respectively, of ��,tit ::,,,,;;, 'Q. � GREATER RENTON SHOPPING CENTERS, INC., the cot-fatikti �sttilb't•� edited the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and volutitay t.and dejd`n-f .said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they;.`arec; a`uthtifilerl."to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the rporate seal of said corporal i&i <p I \• 8;,, -: 1,k iin s y,Iland,WPofficial seal hereto affixed the day and year fi ove wr• e . •'',,,l,„iis►i ' _ Notary ublac an nd for the State of Washington, / residin at Renton'. DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as . Exhibit 'A' attached hereto. WHEREAS, the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs, and assigns as follows: REMOVAL OF UNDERGROUND SYSTEM 1. Removal of the entire underground system on property • described in Exhibit "A" is assured should the operation cease or discontinue operation for more than twelve (12) consecutive months. 2 . The owners of the property at the time the operation has ceased will have the legal responsibility to remove the complete underground system, and failure to do so shall entitle the City of Renton to accomplish this purpose by entering onto the property and removing such equipment in any reasonable manner necessary. 3 . Should it become necessary for the City of Renton to accomplish the removal of the underground system, the owners of said property shall grant to the City all costs associated with said removal including interest, if applicable, as well as any subsidiary or indirect costs, and shall operate as a lien against the property, with the City of Renton being held harmless. 4. In addition, other consequences or costs of removal of the underground system, including any adverse but reasonably anticipated costs of removal such as closure of, or interference with current on-site enterprises, shall be solely the responsibility of the property owners. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. Place Name or names here STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of KING On this day of 1987, before me personally appeared the person(s) who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person(s) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss. County of King ) I . DOTTY KLINGMAN , being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 4th day of MaY , 1987 affiant ( 'deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. #6, Lia4-7-).:7 ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 17/72 day of in P. , 1987. k(1-4021-Lz-0 4,_,_AL __= = Notary Public in and foT the State of Washington, residing at 0e , therein. Application, Petition, or Case #• CU-096-86 and V-005-87 - BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS • (MOB Ct OIL HOOKA I I ON) (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) ti • it MAY 4, 1987 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: BUSH, ROED AND HITCHINGS, INC. File No.: CU-096-86 & V-006-87 LOCATION: S.W. corner of N.E. Sunset Blvd. and N.E. 12th Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the demolition of an existing service station and removal of old gasoline tanks to allow the construction of a new convenience store and gasoline pumps/tanks, and a Variance to allow the site to be located with less than the 10 ft. required landscape setback. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: The Conditional Use is approved subject to conditions. The Variance is denied. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was received DEPARTMENT REPORT: by the Examiner on April 14, 1987 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on April 21, 1987 at 9:40 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Site Plan. Exhibit #3 - Landscape Plan. Exhibit #4 - Drawing of sign for proposed building. Exhibit #5 - Elevation Map showing location of Logos. Jeanette Samek-McKague presented a review of the staff report for the Hearing Examiner. She stated the old service station and gasoline pumps currently on the site will be completely removed by the applicant; the property is zoned B-1; the application is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code; there is a City well off Monroe Avenue that is not being used at this time but the possibility exists that it may be used at some time in the future; and it is felt this site is not in the sensitive portion of the aquifer study area. She continued noting streets in the area are improved; agreement has been reached with staff as to secondary containment for the tanks and fuel lines; and in reviewing the Conditional Use Permit request for the tanks it is felt the project does comply with the secondary containment mitigating condition set out by the ERC. Referring to community need Mrs. Samek-McKague stated the proposed location serves the needs of the residents near the project, with residential uses to the north and northeast of the site, possibly providing better access, perhaps saving them from heading into town or going east into King County. It is felt there would be minimal impact on adjacent properties as the site is surrounded by commercial uses; feels the orientation of the site is toward the main arterial of Sunset; landscaping has been increased to provide more pleasing aesthetics; there should be no impacts on traffic; the application complies with parking requirements on the site; this is a 24-hour use; and there should be no noise and glare problems due to the other in-place surrounding commercial uses. Mrs. Samek-McKague advised further that the site is well served by public improvements; feels the applicant has met or exceeds the required landscaping. Referring to the Variance request for 10 ft. of landscaping on N.E. Sunset Blvd. the applicant at first thought of vacating 10 ft. of property along the right-of-way on N.E. Sunset. Public Works BUSH, ROED AND HITCHINGS, INC. CU-096-86 & V-005-87 May 4, 1987 Page 2 Department was not agreeable to the vacation as they felt some time in the future they may need to add another lane on N. E. Sunset which may or may not eliminate the landscaping. The Examiner asked for an explanation of the undue hardships or unique property characteristics of the site that would warrant a Variance and Mrs Samek-McKague stated there is no real hardship to justify the Variance request except the design the applicant has decided to use for the property. She stated it may be necessary for the applicant to consider a redesign of the project. Based on their analysis it was recommended the Conditional Use and Variance requests be approved subject to the applicant's compliance with the ERC conditions. The Examiner called for testimony in support of this application from the applicant or their representative. Testifying first was Jim Harrison, Bush, Roed & Hitchinas, 2009 Minor Avenue East, Seattle. Wa. 98102. Mr. Harrison referred to the size of the site stating the depth is approximately 150 ft., all three frontages are fixed by permanent public works features, and there is approximately 10 - 15 ft. of relief across the site which makes it very difficult to grade. They have tried to propose one of the smallest convenience stores Mobil owns by setting the store against setbacks which creates a minimum turning radius between the street improvements and pump islands and between the pump islands and the building. He said working with the Public Works Department they have proposed 3 driveways; landscaping offered is more than required; and referring to the request for the variance from the 10 ft. setback Mr. Harrison stated the irregular size and shape of the property combined with the added 10 ft. of relief across the site provides a restricted flexibility for any layout on the site. He stated with the building setbacks and parking requirements it is impossible to place the building any further back from the Sunset Blvd. right-of-way than proposed; with 35 ft. on each side of the pump islands congestion on the site will be a minimum; stated in relation to some of the adjacent businesses it is not believed any of them comply with the landscape requirements the applicant is asked to comply with; and stated he feels the proposal is offering about 50% additional landscaping than is required. Also testifying in support of the application was Tom Hirsch. Mobil Oil Corporation, P.O. Box 3268. Kirkland. Wa. 98083. Referring to the exhibit he pointed out the maneuvering space on the site and explained the changes made from the original application; regarding secondary containment he stated the applicant will provide double-wall fiberglass tanks with a leak monitoring system within the two layers of the tanks, along with a fiber trench as secondary containment for the product pipe. Mr. Hirsch referred to pit liners stating the pit liners can not be tested and consequently one can not be sure they are working - but the double-wall containment as proposed is felt to be capable of complete monitoring for safety of product containment. Their systems are tested and monitored several times when originally installed and at different intervals thereafter. He had no further comments. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:10 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Bush, Roed, and Hitchings, Inc., filed a request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a new Mobil Oil Corporation gasoline service station and convenience store on the site of an existing Mobil Oil Station located in a B-1 (Business Commercial Zone). They also applied for a variance from the provision which requires 10 feet of landscaping along specified arterials. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official issued a Declaration of Non-Significance (DNS) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located on an island between the intersections of Sunset Boulevard N.E., N.E. 12th Street and Kirkland Avenue N.E. The site is on the west side of Sunset, just east of the Post Office and generally southeast of the Highlands Branch of the library. 6. The subject site is approximately .451 acres in area. The frontage along Sunset is approximately 185 feet. The N.E. 12 frontage is approximately 151 feet. The Kirkland frontage is approximately 165 feet. 7. The subject site is part of the original townsite of the City of Renton. The site was rezoned from its initial SR-2 (A residential classification) to its current B-1 by the enactment of Ordinance 1692, adopted in September, 1958. BUSH, ROED AND HITCHINGS, INC. CU-096-86 & V-005-87 May 4, 1987 Paige 3 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of commercial uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 9. An existing Mobil station is located on the subject site. The station will be removed and in its place, the applicant proposes constructing a convenience store and gasoline pumps. 10. An inactive City of Renton well, Well 12, is located immediately east of the subject site on the southeast corner of N.E. 12th and Sunset. 11. Staff did not examine the number of gasoline stations along the corridor, emphasizing that the site was being completely renovated and rebuilt, but there would be no change in the service level. 12. The site will contain the convenience store located in the northwest corner of the triangular shaped site, near the intersection of 12th and Kirkland. The pumps and canopy will be oriented along the Sunset frontage. There will be four storage tanks. Each of the tanks will have a capacity of 10,000 gallons. The tanks will be located more or less centrally on the site. The station is proposed to operate 24 hours per day. 13. The applicant proposes double wall fiberglass tanks. Lines between the tanks and the pumps will also be double walled. Monitoring will occur between the double walls of the tanks. The applicant did not propose lining the site with an impermeable membrane. Such liners have been required for other recently approved stations in the area, especially where either ground water features or domestic water wells have been identified in the area. 14. Commercial uses generally surround the site, and Sunset is quite obviously a commercial corridor with B-1 zoning, the zoning of the subject site, following the corridor. R-3 (Medium Density Multi-family) zoning is located one lot north along Kirkland Avenue. 15. The applicant proposes landscaping the northwest corner of the triangular lot behind the convenience store, as well as providing landscaping along the other two corners. The applicant proposes supplementing the required landscape materials behind the store which would soften the impact of the rear wall of the store. 16. The applicant proposes utilizing the Sunset right-of-way for the two easterly landscaped areas in addition to utilizing portions of the subject site. 17. The applicant proposes eliminating the landscaped setback required along Sunset, and has requested a variance from the provisions of Section 4-716(A) which provides that a 10 foot landscaped setback must be maintained along major designated arterials of which Sunset in this location is one. 18. The applicant has indicated that maneuvering room around the pump islands would be constrained by placing the required landscaping along Sunset. 19. The applicant has limited access to one driveway located along each frontage. Each will be 40 feet wide to easily accommodate turning vehicles to minimize conflicts between the roadway and entering and exiting vehicles. CONCLUSIONS Conditional Use Permit 1. The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the use is in the public interest, will not impair the health, safety or welfare of the general public, and is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-748(C) which provides in part that: a. The proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan; b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location; c. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property; d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; e. Parking, unless otherwise permitted, will not occur in the required yards; f. Traffic and pedestrian circulation will be safe and adequate for the proposed project; g. Noise, light and glare will not cause an adverse affect on neighboring property; i BUSH, ROED AND HITCHINGS, INC. CU-096-86 & V-005-87 May 4, 1987 Page 4 h. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use from rights-of-way and neighboring property where appropriate; and i. Adequate public services are available to serve the proposal. The requested conditional use appears justified and is approved, although it appears that the proposed use may be trying to shoehorn too much on the lot. 2. The proposed use, a commercial operation, is compatible with the site's commercial designation in the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The fact that the use is a one-for-one replacement of an existing gasoline station makes the demonstration of community need less complex than other recently reviewed applications. An existing station is merely undergoing extensive renovation with the addition of a convenience store also planned. The renovation though does raise other issues since the applicant will be more intensively developing the site, a site now subject to greater standards for landscaping. (See variance discussion below) 4. The actual use of the site should not have any undue impacts, again the site is being redeveloped with a use which has been continuously on the site. The 24 hour character could modify traffic patterns but since Sunset is a well defined commercial corridor, impacts from the routine use should not be substantial. 5. The potential failure of the gasoline storage or delivery systems does raise important public issues. A city-owned well is located immediately across the street. While the well is currently inactive, it remains a potential source of domestic water and requires protection. Therefore, the subject site should receive the most demanding technologically safe system for the protection of the underground aquifer. Such a system should include not only the proposed double wall tanks and monitoring system but the entire area underlying the tanks, pumps and delivery lines should be lined with a gasoline impermeable barrier. Monitoring devices should be located between the tanks and the liner, as well as between the double walls of the tank and lines. 6. The one story facility appears generally compatible with the surrounding uses and should not prove intrusive. 7. The renovated business will provide three parking stalls although two of them will block access to the enclosed trash container. Staff indicated that the three stalls will be sufficient. 8. Circulation on the site appears reasonable and the elimination of some driveways, leaving only one along each frontage, will simplify access and egress causing less interference with traffic on the surrounding streets. 9. With the exception of the 24-hour-a-day operation, the impacts of the proposal should not be unduly altered from the existing patterns. The nature of the Sunset arterial should not be adversely affected by the proposed use. 10. The proposed use provides reasonable landscaping but does not comply with the code requirements pursuant to Section 4-716, and this office cannot find justification to vary the provision. Landscaping is not sufficient nor does the proposal meet the code requirements. 11. Water, sewer and storm drainage systems in the area should not be taxed by the subject use although, again, the site should be sufficiently isolated from the environment to contain on-site spills or leaks to prevent accidental contamination of the City's aquifer. Variance 12. A variance is warranted when there are undue hardships which would prevent reasonable use of the subject site; the variance would not result in an unreasonable grant of a special privilege; is the minimum relief necessary; and will not impair the public health, safety and welfare. Since reasonable use of the subject site appears possible without the requested variance, the variance cannot be issued. 13. The Washington Courts have long held that variances must arise out of the inherent nature of the real property and not the personal circumstance of the applicant or particulars of the subject proposal. If a site could be used for a reasonable purpose although not that proposed by a particular applicant, a variance is not justified. (St. Clair v. Skagit County, 43 Wn. App. 122, 126 (1986)). Under the guidelines provided the variance must be denied. 14. While the site is triangular, it appears that reasonable development, albeit, not that proposed by the applicant, could be accommodated on the subject site. Since development is possible without a variance, a variance would be an illegal grant of a special privilege violative of the Renton Code. BUSH, ROED AND HITCHINGS, INC. CU-096-86 & V-005-87 May 4, 1987 Page 5 15. The applicant has cited other businesses which may not adhere to the setback requirements. The Court has even dealt with the applicant's reliance on similar non-conformity on adjacent or nearby property. The court indicated that if the variance gave the applicant the benefits of the earlier zoning provisions, whatever they may have been, the public benefits of the changed code would be totally negated. "In addition, granting variances based upon the proximity of similar but non-conforming uses could prove destructive to the County's zoning objectives. Ling v. Whatcom Cy. Bd. of Adj., 21 Wn. App. 497,500, 585 P.2d 815 (1978)" (Ibid.) Like the court in St. Clair, this office can only conclude that the lots in question are non-conforming and established prior to the amendments requiring the 10 foot setbacks. The variance is not justified upon this basis. 16. The applicant has failed to demonstrate that the site cannot be reasonably utilized, only that the subject proposal would be constrained by complying with the cited provision. The variance must be denied. 17. In addition, as indicated in the analysis of the Conditional Use Permit, it would appear that the applicant by now incorporating a convenience store on the premises has attempted to squeeze too much on the site. Besides eliminating required landscaping, two of the three parking stalls are located in such a manner as to block access to the enclosed trash receptacle, and it would appear that a fuel delivery truck as well as the truck which delivers convenience items could impede general circulation on the site. DECISION The Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The installation of state-of-the-art double wall gasoline storage tanks and subsystems which shall include monitors between the tank walls. 2. The installation of impermeable barriers between the tanks, pumps and pipes, and the underlying and surrounding soils; and the installation of monitors between the gasoline system and the barrier. 3. For purposes of this decision "state-of-the-art equipment" shall mean and be defined as: the most modern and technologically advanced system known for gasoline containment purposes, and shall be of the type of equipment which is installed where the strictest of leak detection and prevention is required. 4. The execution of Restrictive Covenants assuring the removal of the entire underground system if the operation should cease or be discontinued for more than 12 consecutive months. The Covenants shall require that the then property owner has the legal and economic responsibility for removing the system, but failure to do so shall entitle the City to accomplish that purpose by entering onto the property and removing such equipment in any reasonable manner necessary. 5. The Covenants shall grant the City all costs associated with removal including interest, if applicable, as well as any subsidiary or indirect costs, and shall operate as a lien against the property, and the City shall be held harmless. In addition, other consequences or costs of removal including any adverse but reasonably anticipated costs of removal such as closure of, or interference with current on-site enterprises, shall be solely the responsibility of the property owner. The Variance is denied. ORDERED THIS 4th day of May, 1987. ().-• (1;1.,LA--i1,—* 1 `'yam FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER I ' , BUSH, ROED AND HITCHINGS, INC. CU-096-86 & V-005-87 May 4, 1987 Page 6 TRANSMITTED THIS 4th day of May, 1987 to the parties of record: Jim Harrison 2009 Minor Avenue East Seattle, Washington 98102 Tom Hirsch Mobil Oil Company P. O. Box 3268 Kirkland, Washington 98083 TRANSMITTED THIS 4th day of May, 1987 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. May 18, 1987. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. G.Y. • y \ ' F / \ �Q Xl \ PROJECT: nOBtIL III [OgvDRa7lcn qD-4) ` '� t ,'*:;r••; y L� 700 SUNSEI B,TJICVARD E#' '•1 f •� -vq \ J �, . \ aa.et_.\.\. \w O.wFP: w0811 llll CORvpgdTf0 -',�' '-' ter'ilk", b^ \, CIPC6LIM9D.17i5wI W.ipu 9BCB7 x.. �l�S '.{.y,r. • / ! � ,4\`' \ 6 COwf CI: I.E A.Sila0t Fr ury 1 7` I G 2 a�1TEL�j ••* %�� '\Q6 e i API lCawI( I IEAF000Ai: LUSq.ROED A IrC G5.INC. • • �� `t \ 7D09 MINOR aNE N�[w♦`s$I �$ �_11 r`�., 1. rI I �� j r��, ��\♦4\ \ •f♦ r (7061L125-.I.�wL10N 98107 U �• • - [ `i n i7. �. / • —=r:� �`♦ / //�i� • ��\ 4 \ P : 3 cD.racT: 7awEs V.wARR0I2K ? _ • 1,A.Ea}j'�'•. ���...,� �/ \\.. c-• / A.•� /\ �� St- \ IrPE CA'CONSTRUCTION: EWE!I-[(NON-ST.Iw[L CRrDI sY�•'�� ` . •-!, ,ter ��1•• of rniL�1,rOu.JM,�. \ \ t.• N• �li! (� ff . .�'' / / ♦ E ccc mawcr CLASSIFICATION: a-t ^ • � � 4 1: i„�•�--'^^ ' , /, .*��• •%VG '`�\ \� '�.O- 70NING DISTRICT: GI(BUSINESS/ Z> i"G;�}�! i h•t3 /• \ �� Y TOTAL LOT AREA: 19.6a7 SCONE FEU.0.451 ACRES =� i'• •l'�• .. lgli �.rt • � •i•• • •�\ :�\ AREA:BUILDING 1,024 SCORE FEET 0 7 • • J • L V� ♦ t� A as Ip--r \F� • �. r•� EAwoPr uEA: 2.A09 SCUAR f 7 .�s lit '.-' I 9{ PORING STALLS PROVIDED: 11 IINCLIZES I IT PURR ISL.NDS7 F+r ^ "fie,•♦ j ♦ b. \Q, 1ff LArASCaPIwC 6REe RCG1(R[D: t.7tI0 SPJSR(EEFr(BISED UVOR t0 FOOr �V141AA14Y M.•�ilt ® y,,y` ✓� a-a• �, �\\ .? RI.IwJi AROUND PERIMETER, LESS 0W •u.a,•,. �,♦� 'I I- \♦ 4•u1' OgIrE.Ar OPENINGS) W Z . y • / 'fi y, �✓ SCAP[wC FREA FROYIDED: .a20 SCORE FEET Q Z , br/•• I •h Po • i ::- L. �• i. �.. \\ \\ :\..,,,, fALulrtOa: f750.DO0.00 NV i '. ` 7..% �•I �J e•4S .C.0 Ffl[D 4.5 cIIGY ttM9 VriD1,' / ,..••• we.nurxyouno...,s ° t{, .: ii:4o.li''••¢•11.',.I'i'F.".:S°:iw°idc nnro n.�a >yy ci nns.r.rLi 0;'7 u..cmd o t..12 CUSv7 DATA / ♦ •Y °rse 3 \ i. .SK tip•OtwL s u D` s.Is. % � � , t��+]]1 ■ z ♦ S •L `.t1 rna+ n ro(p,�rtRro reCn.p/ .rw n 4.9oL,1' _ }jT �..0 RLV<•r 3 l\ IEI�a[w GAR .tII9'¢o.f®31Y fP leerL.•rD..ov' `� ,�. e ! C^ • ' :r r.ex qrr� 4.w/ a.r �� I \ PRd r aP u<a =la.,'7r.'1fs•„„ , tql% • �� / 'i°' y� D4 y ":d_' • `yo- � �"\ �.� ` g'., uta�<Fu.vL tLrr v w.u..rover.w.L.:.Fr.0 a • ,......,. fi; • / .- • . .• , • 9. ''s.. i' j.. ...vmYrwarr xn o.: .l--- i room Bracy-- m rauva,w J1� \ ID f� '. • -s. .. _ r..... .:.• ._ � / u ,.yRo rz'r"Mx¢[u.eamora.a. I - , \ .• ww r� ` -- :� .s •�-}• \ \ \.\. �..w+.a.� ... , 1T11j r..e.�s.o.a®M m -. ' Y 5 • . • • 7714PAp-M.i.4*.; p t w• a✓-� �.wa Si: ., �\' I i D /II r � y �, fC AI -r1 _.;ta I ( ) ''I . g iAr,!.-.)••• e•• wove. P \\ \/ .;11cauyRORLRK(vv) a / • yyppi 1 • ./lam \ • \\\\\ ‘... ...4.1.; 1.,..„ Nri,n De < . .. .aY.Aea.K...w :._ o � :I±1; / I \�,. ••• ....- . -• ...••- •. . - , • , . / .11•11/ .I. • s. i \ . • ' ......[...PI a.,..... ....., ,/ . C {{!i •• .. fors �. " \ - -- r1'ta.Ne i[P, %'I" ' ,< Sds o \�\ YvfA(Jr lyd.w IG4..o.cc.olw /. ,0 ��t. u \\ ;ri • .• ----C.•arva"we.w l¢..,l ]---r"e' ,♦r-n �.,.r f4..•sr.l L.rar u.n♦m� —{ • e.nr.e o.M A yr �L_. \ _ f Mortsr..w.0 No'-a' a •— I--- A •\ \ P11D •JVN ' lt_.P elii ♦ •. .,av W c.�wYY c.c... Il __ \ er,- e -o- / e 1senv...u+•.wK•nvm.R oa•..(ausa.1 4.rae.d.+rN,...e.., � •.��.,.kr+ l••.I0' rt•'!•K N.E. SUN 5 E T -E, L V D. /C— ---�-- ...r ,.:i ce��—\— a •- esoeo.o5 4 a , of: •f_•y':" .' '�` - r•- '. • • S.v: i it • .vrt • PLANT SCHEDULE S'ZE, covo.r,'o/Ys, • �` 1p • ^�; ., j 7 SYMDOL COMMON NAME • ' I AtYYIHO DETAL�,B _ •/i \ •�\ \ rr I\ REMA4K/ aJ -. ,. — ✓• //gyp\ \ _ I cGCA'RUORUM'..ti7JBER 6LLk'Y' 2•LA[ /J'-/1'wr,KELL q !f, 11. `jI-!. • v �^��'''' .C/ Zv j \ e..i �•I, REO MAPLE OR4 NLNE0 AGJYC 7',•B•B 9pppJJJ �� . • ' • - Y• maw• �d �_ o• OV Y/ T/' GAL • /ANA TO G4•IT B•B,5 A jB✓5NY trr7 .!.,.::. • 4 •r.m...•• ram_+ u ^j'� �" - rl.�i :. UouOur5 TREC2• JACK P/NEci �/ \ \�"� \ I'/NUS CANRS 5'6'NT,5,9, ��. p0 ?�/� r � rE'-w!�•� / f���� ♦Nr 1 �ROLKERY WALL(TTF) Z s - .../ -� _J "'- L�' �r \l� TAXU9 BALATA �CFFAN4`//5 /N•L/;BUS IY FULL Z N.A9e Y '_�'— ak �� �� 'S� �� !`RI1. 4410�` \ F\ O ENGL/5N YE✓J B.6 NO L. ' O- •x+vs• -T O p•pRm•T/^v RdfG-Y ©-.-�. ••• •' / ♦�i4► O ♦ 4 \\ MULT/-SrEMHECJ Z' } . � W / �Y�'.+•p 'Its p�'j,•\ /� EUUNYMOUS ,MO /L•Z4•NT•9 ff a \I Y//NEED EUONYMOU9 SFL L/MENO..•'GGL-FaCNE0.0.O iN �r , ' sad o p y • \ BERBER/9 OUfrFOL/q iYA.'JA' /2'-r5"Nr,WELL.94ANL NED, f"6 . - I• .,{ p�,` \ .a, O AwARF DARDERRY 2YMMGT4IGAL PORM,O•B - TW b . '+*.r+`-ice .N�.i e }4; 4w e _ ''y� ?\ -/5.NT /ELL A44AGNE0, //^//j 1'.. /..". i1� , T q, EL RBGR/9 TNUNBERG J D.B. O Z �/ .•• \r 0 E RY SYMMETR/GAL FORM. W_ �' ♦ - • .IAPANE9E BARB R 4 ,•+i - �•lai 4 .1\�:'• •� P.1aR/EN9/S /2•-/5'MT,MA/1(dL LOA'T 04 _ - \ •G ♦♦ \ G/9TU9 GO J • ;: I p •�,�i.Cl 0 B•B,6YMMETR/(G4L FGJPM• ROLK RO•,/C V \ j;. _. -.•• t S� TAXU9 CAGATA'REPANDEN$' /2•-J5'NT,BUSMy,FULL TO = Zk/L 5PREADiN6 GN6Lr9N YEW 9A9E,a•B,20.OG L 9PA�L/N6 /M/ '���' • \• • /� } CDER4 NL/X'HILT/G4' . tr �J • \ N / ✓ Ru'NER9.SPREAO N6 STEMS, � / // � ( �I�_ \) t CN6L ./ Y 700 G A SPAL/N(•.W/J•T ,,�►t`• '� t _ __- I ( I�r ROW IT•/NSJOE GUR6 a.F�L �Ial f'i � t'LAWTfkO "ECIFICATIO B......i. \�\ \ �iF.NERAL NOTES I11 ��`,::y. yp•L \\\ \ 4LL sP4L/No 5 SNOW'O/P/.4N UNLG95 NO TEO r� \ ;r;., /7// -. / /// _ ram:; ,r � ;�J;;�, \ • .,.a • .L e 1 \ J . I hit.,IV \\ . . ...,.,,.. . . .. . . . . .. .. 9 // Arlo.;, r.--7---. .:......m.:'.. .. --:r-.11,- •. - / �i/ • ;,u,•w '•r�u•'uV®r'-'•ter'- o . `` \ ;1°8: /Q . / 1 ora -"a.:1�'l=:a�r.a--•- .a.r.. •' ', �Pyj// �� /'\• \�\, �lqq_ • • l-l'.'. :::-.-:.-.i%.T.—rir- \ fix• i 'a1..... • . ..pia—_\__ �� .�_ .. .. \ • - / • i _. pt•Of�N•t-1 IO.Gu.—T. �f/' ��-� —�i0 Masrn o/awf�.n.l \ \ _• j Crrri ..\..i*..-.-4-••--•-2.,2 N.E. 6 U N 6 E i ® l.V D. --------- �IO-C.GJ-L i l' v 7:- . . — ! ) 1V _,4 '\'L±E ;\ \i + 1 11 , •• 't ion!1 ''- \ •" , )4a '-.' I n • .t , � 'r 1 I - - - t`• _�� 1 ,Q I I y,J ip V1i',1• A9 .t r 5 t , n�r71t.--. �u' Si ;�y , Lam. • '.i' A mot "I " It r 0 01 Iv 1— D 0 i , G� cl z ,p 2I1 «0 6 0 .` 7":4- '1\ — 7(„, 3' s i L'_'I sI . - 1t \a Mil. t i B I • .. 2._� 20 n . a i. ��1 " a p' • , MN- 5t L . t I I ' 1 1 "d r „ r, t ���� �'� �j te a : r, 46 i% ,z j �r td1 yy�� Pi�� RO1 ' j J`• � ` ..9/., � + ,.,I i• 1 I tct ., 1'l,_7 '''z1J 7: I. t n,T R-/ H 4 t1 rr ! CV L -� e N- F ,Iih I �Yi �, �E * g ', Al f ,,, -r ;Ito I ' I / 38 ram/, - flP! i•r0r{ ' ' M �41`1•..}_: y q ; - ri ••'/ ' bSIS t ' i3 I G- 1 I �1' ` 6 i al= f :l -� \ 'i; r � Jr L , I 1 , 1 `' - -� �, I " �.' 1 I r ,r0, I I 3 , . ro .. 4.5 11 I ':.iiil ' [ 4. 'll.•.-t�I -�` I.~'��? 1 �I nF q \• �t / �3 V 32. ,t,k. T:' ii. I1. 'ltl'l•W-L•I'L.�'_ (, •..! • I,..I.j.1 I.I.I , ,, •• _ � L-':, 1 , .0I,., ' d1— t -I` in)•I.7•t•t :', 1 „ ,. I -.t . ,�` . :7f.±1' -- .li := ti ,y—7•, _ 1. tL �, ,.I L I' F:-1 `.-- ri • R-1 : -` tI 11—`1 '1 1 ;Fr. 3'r ' P NTARY �L �. !`' 1� , ` �1l. ,F" 7 ' • lr.,��jj 1 , � . h - � I I---,-.7% ., , , , w •e • r/Tr)'•�• � ) ' r 1 r � ' � ' S .1r' it y { _,?-i- , : ' \ ' __. .,.:_ • 1 1 • .... . . •. ., APPLICANT Bush, Roed 4 Hitchings, Inc. TOTAL AREA ± 0.451 Acre PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E. Sunset B1vd. ,N.E. 12th St. ,Kirkland Ave. N.E. . EXISTING ZONING B-1, Business Use • EXISTING USE 'Gasoline, Service Station PROPOSED USE Gas Station $ Convenience Store COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial • COMMENTS • 3696Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 21, 1987 APPLICANT: Bush, Roed, and Hitchings, Inc. FILE NUMBER: CU-096-86, V-005-87 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Application for approval of a conditional use permit to allow the demolition of an existing service station and removal of old gasoline tanks to allow the construction of.a new convenience store and gasoline pumps/tanks. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Mobile Oil Corporation 2. Applicant: Bush, Roed, and Hitchings, Inc. 3. Location: (Vicinity Map Attached) Located at the S.W. corner of N.E. Sunset Blvd. and N.E. 12th Street. 4. Existing Zoning: B-1, Business Use 5. Existing Zoning in the Area: B-1, Business Use 6. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Commercial 7. Size of Property: + 0.451 acre 8. Access: N.E. Sunset Blvd. , N.E. 12th Street, Kirkland Avenue N.E. 9. Land Use: Site developed as a gasoline service station. 10. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Commercial, Residential East: Commercial South: Commercial West: Commercial C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date ' Part of the original townsite. Rezone (SR-2 to B-1) 1692 September 3, 1958 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: a. Water: Ten-inch (10") water mains are located along Kirkland Avenue N.E. and N.E. Sunset Blvd. A sixteen-inch (16") water main is located along N.E. 12th Street. All lines are adjacent to the subject property. b. Sewer: Eight-inch (8") sanitary sewer lines are located along N.E. 12th Street and N.E. Sunset Blvd. adjacent to the subject property. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: N/A 4 + PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER BUSH, ROED, AND HITCHINGS, INC. CU-096-86, V-005-87 APRIL 21, 1987, 1986 PAGE 2 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: N/A b. Middle Schools: N/A c. High Schools: N/A 5. Recreation: N/A E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-711, Business Use (B-1). 2. Section 4-748, Conditional Use Permit. 3. Section 4-722(G), Variance. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Commercial Goals and Objectives, Policies Element, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March, 1986, pgs. 16-18. 2. Northeast Renton Area Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March, 1986, pgs. 55-60. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, Bush, Roed, and Hitchings, Inc. , are representing the Mobile Oil Corporation in the redevelopment of the subject property. The property has been developed with a gasoline service station. The Mobile Oil Corporation now wishes to replace this facility with a new modern convenience store and gasoline pump and tank. 2. The applicant has submitted an application for a conditional use permit to allow the proposed pumps and tanks on commercially zoned property specified in Section 4-711(B)3(d). They are also applying for a variance to allow the applicant to forego installing a 10' foot landscaped strip along the property line fronting N.E. Sunset Blvd. 3. The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated on March 11, 1987. The Environmental Review Committee upon review of the project, felt that the applicant should take measures to protect a nearby domestic well site which were acceptable to the Fire Prevention Bureau and Utility Engineering Division of the Public Works Department. The well site is currently not being used, but Public Works staff indicated the potential exists for reactivating the well. Thus, the Committee issued the Determination with the following condition: A secondary containment for the fuel tanks and lines to the pumps be provided and approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau and the Utility Engineering Division of the Public Works Department. 4. Conditional Use Permit: The subject proposal with the mitigation measures of secondary containment for the fuel tanks and lines generally complies with the eleven conditional use criteria listed in Section 4-748(c). Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan Map designates this site as commercial on the Northeast Renton Area Plan. The proposed project generally complies with the Commercial Development Objectives of the Plan as well as the policies for Commercial Policies listed in the Policies Element of the Comprehensive Plan Compendium. . PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER BUSH, ROED, AND HITCHINGS, INC. CU-096-86, V-005-87 APRIL 21, 1987, 1986 PAGE 3 Community Need: The proposed project location appears to satisfy the needs of area residents in residential developments to the north and northeast of the site. The station appears to be conveniently located for individuals leaving the residential areas, for the shopping areas along N.E. Sunset Blvd. in the immediate area as well as to other parts of the City and County. While other service stations or convenience store/gasoline pump facilities exist on or are proposed in the area, there does not appear to be an over concentration of these facilities. Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed site has minimal impact on adjacent properties. The applicant complies with the development standards of the B-1, Business Use Zone. In addition, the applicant is providing large landscaping areas along the western portion of the project together with the landscaping areas required adjacent to the other property lines. Parking: The subject proposal appears to comply with the requirements of the parking and roadway ordinance. Three parking stalls are provided adjacent to the building and the remaining stalls are adjacent to the pumps. Traffic: The Traffic Engineering Department has reviewed the applicant's plan, and as a result, the applicants modified their plan to meet the concerns of Engineering with respect to turning movements to and from the adjacent streets and with respect to, the number of driveways that existed when the site was used for a gasoline service station. Noise and Glare: The project will result in minimal noise and glare impacts on adjacent properties. Most of the site is surrounded by commercial projects and arterial streets which generate light and glare. Thus, the increase of light and glare from this project will not adversely impact the surrounding properties. Public Improvements: The site is adequately served by public services. The project has the potential for impacting an existing well site should an oil spill occur. The Environmental Review Committee as part of its review imposed the requirement of secondary containment for the fuel tanks and pump lines per approval of the Fire Prevention Bureau and the Utility Engineering staff. Thus, the project as mitigated will not create an undue burden on public improvements, utilities, or services. Landscaping: The applicant has provided a landscaping plan meeting code requirements and to the west exceeding code requirements. As noted in the application, the applicant is seeking relief from having to provide 10 feet of landscaping along the property line adjacent to N.E. Sunset Blvd. This will be discussed in the next section on the variance application. 5, Variance: The applicant is seeking a variance from Section 4-716(A) requiring a 10 foot landscape strip adjacent to arterial streets. The applicant has tried to provide the necessary landscaping by seeking to vacate 10 feet of right of way along Sunset adjacent to their property line. However, the Public Works Department does not want to vacate property since the possibility exists of adding an additional lane. If the property provided the 10 feet landscaping strip, two problems would arise. First, they would loose adequate circulation around the pumps with the existing design, and second, if they redesigned, the cashiersin the store would loose visibility of some of the pumps. The Police Department was concerned with the lose of visibility if redesigned since gasoline thefts are on the rise. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER BUSH, ROED, AND HITCHINGS, INC. CU-096-86, V-005-87 APRIL 21, 1987, 1986 PAGE 4 Thus, the granting of the variance does not appear to be detrimental to the public welfare since the owner would have to keep the landscaping in the right of way maintained. Nor does the granting of a variance grant a special privilege to the owner. In fact the Plaid Pantry at 2801 N.E. Sunset Blvd. had a similar problem and was able to vacate City right of way along N.E Sunset Blvd. to order to comply with Section 4-716(A). H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis and discussion, it is recommended that the conditional use permit CU-116-86 and the variance request V-005-87 be approved subject to the following condition: 1. The applicant comply with the mitigating measure for secondary containment in the Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated issued by the Environmental Review Committee. ,I • �� Li- \ 36) I t • w`Q }t �- - < I - _ l 1 l � i - _ ...7 e . ,t , I 1 L ., 6-Jn t. MC ANIC,II f • >; �, -13— �� ((( —'tom �_ r A 1, ` I Y l'_ _ IIJ 1:'.J,f, nR .t, 5 1.16 t I �'N�`1M1ir Sf .�—L-- , , ,-, . '.141 )7 li. H 'i 1 ®® �; r • t9 7 ' p I —2, --sti r is / '' d : • ( X/ ''.,ii I-4 -:-- , ,, i I A's . ,' 0 4.,„ r-.1.-, L, 4 j / I 1 I it . ',I,— v ,,,fr,: R-3 , '{' r // i Lw 3 t1 :, i I ^Pf--Il , 1so 1 - . 0 IF 17 7, // 38 S I• ! 11 1 r[Na,t1,..:.1,,ti•s:-1•::::_i a ,o ,1i,• .�.�1•,1...±, 6/7/ '''' :3 2/18 ,___‘. /_±..L N E / ] \,\ 9i 1�. • '. , JIB 1.�_ J Aliili �`y71��y�y7yP Jam/ 37 ,.., L11 c_{ „ I -�' ! • o , R-3I \ • / <1 I 1 .-\ ,Q1i. = 4'• -1 _ t-- ' i�! ;`\ lSC ' ; .� �'L., 4.11 ,1 (. 1},/" 1, --L Jl I'I Ilr�e ( - - — • TI',I,1T�..I'•', II ,, ' _ / '1 ✓ / `�11 ( ;t., t'• I1 '1��•�I��T'I �I 1 •o. ,.,' T_. '1 , ..c,nc_Cf-:. ,`\• ..4._ °- • 33 i 32: 11, M/ �' —1 L'LLl_1.!1—►-1_•I ace_ ( .... ,`` ( �• to �t. a 1 h E •I.'. .I y ' 1 , =� , . • L, f•5 • ,i- `fir• )r'7 W!f 71 I,..I I.I.I ,� „' , =5 L.- 1 t,__d1,.. -IF_, .��f �l: 1?1'I•G'I'I�.�I' • • I . I� — -��.-�_ 1. k ;R-1 j r 1 L:/. a "„ 1., _I' 9 "_,;L_. t', J I ,'4,`. ` + 1 -\ , 4J 1' 1 1�!, , ^I']r I J 1 M1 ' J~ ) '--- . .7.1 _�.' _�11 1 1. EI_ '�-N•.. -•. . li, r ,I ' NTAPY L_L -. i'' ',' I —I Flo I ' •1` I'. • �I I. 1 —� v • , •• ' 33 I , !! , I 11 1 1 ,, : • _F. I. I I I I ' I APPLICANT Bush, Roed $ Hitchings, Inc. TOTAL AREA ± 0.451 Acre I - 1 PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E. Sunset Blvd. ,N.E. 12th St. ,Kirkland Ave. N.E. EXISTING ZONING B-1, Business Use EXISTING USE -Gasoline, Service Station PROPOSED USE Gas Station & Convenience Store COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial COMMENTS I . , „ . . .. , • '7'V,1 .;1 - ••.',_ , .. ., ., .., k l 'jIV ------ --__ .•. ,.,-. ,.,..'::::.:.-....:.:,.:...;., . . ,. ./ ptiaornk . ,. ,.. . • ,.,.:.,. . , ,. . ... _. .. ,,.,:...„.,.......,: . , _ . . ._ . ..„..,...„ .,,,....._ sy,..,,,,....,,,„,, .. . .........„,..........,..„, .:,_..,...........:,, ,,,......._. .....,: .. s, i. \ • . .\ ......, , •,....T,-•,.., .:•,.. '•:.••1,.. •••,:--, •t:1-,`-'•'---• .. -.•.. -• , „./. •,-. ,• „ • %.s •MM t ,* .,. ...-:.: ,..,',i,"':.•..-•' 7::,,..::.''.,". " i .', ' • % 1, " f•-,. ' :''.-•.,,.--!. -7 al . .:-.:-....7 . ., • _. . . . ..„, ... . ., -.-,-. : .,•• _., ••1411,40,1 ON - '.• . cy•,„;„.0.000.0.00%000000..: ... .- .%•%417 01 •'' titt • ,. a ;- wt.,. 30000000.0 ,....rr so 0, . . . .. . ‘ -,',...,,......., ..„ . . •-, %.,.:,...%._..i.tp.; . r:-.::;••••---_- :-..": NI MOW... „, MIMI.... ... ,‘,„ • . .... ..,:.i..: : : ::::.. "..;;:,--,'..•-•-... , I= K E . 4 ''‘I ' ki.• V.,• -. )' 1.*; , get•A.:::• :.2",c •Eci.' I , -r• • I ,:-.°0°. :-.....:. '-f.;•-•',c•.••• ' ' ' I} 1 . .. .13.i4 ....,7_,.t...... . i ! GTON ,• •, ,„, ....... ,,, pp..,0::,_:,,:..,,,,. -„:,..,..,,,. , .`.....rrr..„1", . • • -‘*;;C.- •I • • ' 1 ... 1,,•,: 1 .1••• ' •• • •e• . •C.• Inglinilkle 00.111111111, • i'. -. li Tc.,t.e aim-01r-------.... ...._.i. .,„''',NM ::::::]:iiiii:,ilelt:`',...•?..„, • ty.1, '11% : - 1 tool • - wad g:: :::,: le;nossei '--'-":•••••i,'..-, . .471.1 I' IL', imoct• • mimosa( :::•:•': •"111111, . ''' ..- ,••. pi:-•, Ins \ ,.0 0 0 0.. jimwas t trimmor • i ,, „...., -.,• :'3 • Min Ly.o.o.,od ,iiiimierAri,, . iiiiiiiits.:_45:1114 ••0•• n• 42.. .••• I.Mi i' . l7‘14 ".' '' 11.1114 . ' • . •• - ' ./'' 0°0°0°0 0 04071JAV •• %44 .41111111 g a goii*:.::wisr..4:!,5514,..,4101111111 illSrmim: ' . ..°9:0.°009,0'0.%. ...._.-•-_-...-0°.°0 e.°0°0°.6:'0'.. -,-,... '.\'. iW::::::::.....r..-:,,,-..._ 4 RI '012::,,Art • min RAI \ ....::::::..:•:•:•:•:•:•:•::..w.........:0:0:000.: 000.0.00• _ -,....„ (7,) 0 0 0 <3 0 ..., (3 f;3 ;.,.1 .'' ':::::::::: r.r.7.7411111Mi. y.:::::::::::: -.110•IehomitT ME •00000• . •11D i'" o 0 el) es co o • . • o o 4". - , ::::::i* ..4kSmallai i:•:::*:::: i•s!, .• .• ., .30.00., 0 o • • o o o o o . a .a o p‘,c- ..:*i:i*i ...; I:Iiir :::i.iktiioNIA4:1!/.''4 Fr -1 1 liWIIIPRI, ni 0000 • 0000 • oo, 00 ..' 'c. die. -::::.• iii.laiMiNk • o o o • o o o o c • or ":•,,i ' ::i::::*::i::r f .......... 1 ::::::::,:.-41111t..r4f, , 1 t.,,:•..r.-......, . o o o • • o • • • • o \o o o •,.. , :i:i:i:::.::i:.:: / ''• ir 411.1 rimr ( 1 • 000 • 0000coo\ oo •.A.;-" , •:::i::::::::: . i...-.m.J G 0 C 1 • • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'A ,.::0 i nJIM i 'IM••• ..•• 1M11.111111111L' • ,, 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 c, tc .':i:i*'I Na ), imM1,73e..," 11 r 1., 0 • 0. 0 • • • o co o • o o a 1 r :*:.Ir. 77----:.--. !or! ; 1: clerjusi ,0, • . o o o , o o o o o .':,,,,, ,-::- ill ..6.• . . ' 1 00000-0000.000.0.001 ...,•0000 • 0000 • 0000• o,...„'1, i ,,.c.; .0.0., Sit •0000000000,,..,_ o • oo • 000 • • .__11._0_ ,''Ai, E.•' Milli '`0, •• 00• p • o • o • 00000 , 0000 4,•. , %ill :s-1.-"'oc'e7..r.loctillio „,•••-- -.::a: ::•:•. f'.3. e000 oo • -t000c. 00 t. ,\\ Itip.„,...., 0,000.4tuamat 0. ..i. o .3 .0 • 900 0 .. .boo o .. 't,7 • :-:-:•:.:-.::.:•••••••-•:-:••• • 000 4',„ i , • 00000 , ikl 0• f ,„0,, 4) 0 0 0 ,, .:::.. ., .0,00 00 00, 0 ' 1„ , 25,, :t • ° 1.- •••0 , 0 0 • l''. 4 '; 1 :11111116 li ' i ::.... !.::::::i.i !.. ‘,... . • .. 0 • 0 ....•••• , . 000 „ . , ‘• .. •11111111•11E .......- 0 ,• 0 , _. ., • o • oobo ..- 1 ,\‘. i c'0°•'; ''' '' ' ' rr,:.%14' slet, d.z)° ° ° p ° '' ' 1 g °' '•- ';90°0')Iit''*'41-41.: • ii ff. 0. • 160111114 ' • .,_i••••0 O• •' ° ° L.:. .)-**04:•N.:so it• . 0'..',0 0.-9. ? 9 f ,."• ---- s-: ,:c1:;.,.•0"0., :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. ,..< 1--- -r II'----8:' ;'. .n'i:] . D0000!.. ci. o • "IP moo* . 0 0 0 .,.,i#1k, II; :.i:.i ..... . ..iosoo .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.x.x.:•:.x.:.:.:.:. Ai I Mg,g..,..0.... ... „iiinnellin lit 0 0% o q ,...r• Ak ' um. ' :0..ig• o) pi, if A .„, ., ....... ....... . . . , .... .. ;,%g '.6,::gnoVEMEEP sii.,_,,„ .„ 4, ,.. , ,/, P''' . ..-.,._. •:•:•:.,.•.•••••:••:.:,•••:,„,Itissime.:q ;ggogg:‘• '"0°2° illin 0 7 i•-•-•--•""*.---101.' 'rit•••);111' I,01111!..„1. ,''. 4-••••••'..4( .................:..7.7;:::.• 01--='•fle--------,..n . ,..,,,-,,',.- 1 ' -Neill Zirr'' •.Vr".,:-Z.L.......):•:•:•:-:•:•:•:•:.:.: 0 0 00. ,00.,,,,-,,, II ill t ,..,ii•,,.eilr . AV....,''1'. .:: i**::Mai:::::..:.::...••0'0•1.,L.z...2.q,.000-000.0000.00.00-00-93-0. 1 ii....i.M1 .':::::::.1,1.9.•_25.•'.. i0::::''',0000004 .-00,F.,,,....1 WI 111' •• -''' %'-.-,-,•ei.. (•,c,,,W,::,.1.'..,. ;:i.im:.:.••...:::':iiii .000.0.0000/0000.00.00000000.:000001.00.000000000.00.0000..,' ....:„........:.7,-;:;.illi, a,..1 ,:iiiiii ib,-•:7,a,mitim, ''2'igig •L' .'. ', og:141iihtigorgo47 grata- •llLI ,r: ,:.:.:....:::::.::::: : :.:.::;:i.: ,ogo,0,0,0,,, •g,.., ... :.:.:.:.:.:::::::::::::::::::::. 00.0.00.0•00.000.000 -...:::::::::::::::::::.:.::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.„.•. . 0 .00c,?cc•4_,0 ...---,-,0 =.4141ffillhi INLigefingsri/41,11 ., 'tie,.. .:-...:., '..i*iffi:]:i:]:Mii] .._,c1pp000000.000000000•000000000 :::::::. 0°0° • • Mr: 411:::1111,m-ri, f. ,,- .-....0-‘000 ,.., :: ]im::i: i:iii: ,..u.-cro 1 000000000.00.00000000000000000000, ,,,„: 0 •................ 0.00.0000.0000,300.0.. :.•• ...... • „. . :i •• ......... ,. II „. 140 111111,•;ij..".,:" Y.,1,. in.• „o0o0o0o... ., •,:.:.:.:•:.:•:.:•:.:.::•.::•.::::•.::•.::•.::•.::•.::•.::• '.0oc,o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o.oc000.o., 1 t.:.::::•...::•::::::::-: •,:30,;(3,'„ r;.. ..:,4.,:gy- ,.. i 4,al :'• '00000. . '.:.....................X.X0000000000000000000 i ........,.......:.:,0•00000000° ..,z;: li 1; ••0 0 0 0 0• • • '::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: e.00000000000000000,,4 i ,giVggggg' ,1111.Alit 14 S ki.'r;,:..f fi-e".% II'.:..:.;,,,c;;c'• :.- i .•2°°°°°.°°°° '.:•::::i: ]W 1 "..4.1,,, - ! 1 •. ....... , • ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ,,,, t.,,o0o0o0o0o.00000., ....., ..:, . 0; le 11511:11:11Ve fe7 .: :ii....PZit'\?• .1;'•1,4 , _-.:z......0:2'.12,..•!5:11 *.°0-0', ;..'4-40st4_,.At0,..`v,(7,11 41, . ,: ii;ii:iii:ii: ii .,,;,..,v00000.000 ?f. : ::::.:.: ,,::,: _ EN ONIN souniame imemiesm RI..,/,,,r. ••••.• -..,..,,,_ L,,, .,. , '4.4.,„...1 - :::::::::::::::::::::::• .• ;,,,,•'0%.--.''.!, ::.'''''.`,.,: •:•:•:::::::•:•:::•:•:: \ -*-??;;;11214111:114• J:•,.,'''''.? 'l a'•,..,`'.1•Ctkr > :-:-:•:-::::::::::::::. „ _ et. .mmairemalilitrief., '3.,92;,•c,, , . . ,.:2...,...:"..1,...•(;,, .a".0,1 ,.• ,:,' .%:,..L',.4.3-,22.,,,,?..,-:•'?,,:f.;'''..9.i',",..-•:,• .:::::::::::'::':: :::.:/10010 ''' • O. 4 Nell SWINE Mal:MittillINO II • ‘4•1?-.:.''A'.` ....Y1C;:1;(1..:L%-C..11i5:'''"I;ir''.1?:;; ;;'''''q:'''''''''''"":;11'.:e. ;:''''?":r:e;r4..?..''..--;:'''''''''' '::?r7;27."'"r.::-::':: .....':: n,. :im!!!Ir.•-S1•2!!!499, „,. .f,,-,i".,, T'd,,.,,,•••Vlicek 1:.•..xr.2,.r.?, ..,...p:',,,•,,•?,,,.,,c.,6,,,,n,,.Q.....,e,•c,6%,..%.,,,..9.,!.-,.,..,ci...y:',,.. ......:::i::i:: Itir..". iiiiig •:0);/el? .t,• 'V'er4<?..i .: 1.6. .1)J..J.:.::2.1.;.P.:*n '. .." ''IV?.?.'n7' '..4.2'.14.1 ". i . - :it...... 0001 ,S. iz,..„,..44,3 •z• .. -- -,•;.. --&,•,....,,,,k,c,:e4. v. 1.- 6.',7`. .'' * 'Z..,,. • "I''.'11•',iy. -..! . ' . -• - ;',1: -',,oPiAlz, ma", ',c"'c'0'.- --e- - - ..., • c -, •,;•-i•i • • ,,,,--,.i. • .:• .- (c ••, - acc..... ,•,..- ..tNIIIN‘pp k 4• (.Cit'C'Y.• .. '. • ,- ---.-',''-. .Als.k.10,11g )3.i ,,;„."i,,,,„• .., ... : --,,-t-, ••• -.. / .----,•,11.-;;/.. -rvi,7f,., - •-,k,- ,....„.:,..,•z)., 4.1, • z , . p„„,....",.% ay, ' -„ 0.,,• . N*V4K4WR 0 p.r k .0.A:,..„,, ,,:..,0,...,,.:,;? , • ... . .• ,4„.4,444024 •,,,.e- ' ''r...1%,'..-' • --_ ---- c : • . 44 111K ''.(!),cr,cr.., 1`•C''.f. RkNinW°111144114 '. %,..NA AI:. I Jai " . n'', .:: , •• >r,f...‘"•,n, ,•"-ill•o'- '• • • • '. , 44,,ri,.4:,-.. r•, t-.' •(- r• .e, ;,-T. --, F ' 01. '4 '•,00000., ,0000• l't c...., il,•. '!,,7i.N: ,4.,n e-1••••,... ". e• . • c''' ,.:.`".-4`,`,.ro0,...•', ,1'',:'•s:`•";\1,.Zi. ' ' • ;„,c,•:•e-• .r C.er el- el-r.4'r' ' . ,:ogo • Ily 0.000.0.. .,......,,,. .,..,.;...,s-N.0 0„.,,,,,, . ,, ..\ :.:0 ....• ."'Vs, • s•• r•,r, r:r ,-.•re rcr-( • , ........4..S.....' ...:.i.gogt.•a P.:.mm es ,13.. •o_o_.. „o ,Mk...,.• / .. 04.. ,„-.(:-,,;•,‘; •.!.--;.. :,.„r?,, ,,,• •. . •,•., •..."......!.. "'../;• •...,1 ' • i ''......- • Ve4ce. r-.:.........2M %L. IM •16.er •--•''".1',' k•'''. ',:,'1' '. r -'k • ' • T-------' • • , , .. 111111111 , k '4.: T ...„,...-(--••- =`'.:e.e, . ' -,,,,,,,,..." .• . ,rr. 4.-.........--- . ...- •. •'7 -1?•.• . 1111111, LAND USE ELEMENT , ' el 1.•:' ''...s..„x„ .„' - i 0. .. ft..77,70.....,.. -•-\\ \-- 1 i \ . . ' Single Family 1••mmmmm i Commercial ....L.... „.....,.... '''-'14,..,,zr;,•• .„,:e;,-,. ,. • i T . % . , -• - ,,--.. $."...s• , - ••• " . ...... LOW Density ....... ' Office / Office Park . ..2 ......- ........... .....z .•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•. Multi-Family ,, , . - , _...., ... .00000.0 '••,. '3•''•'...-•',',..A...',9:•• .ii.:i.iMil:::ii Medium Density 0.000... .,. ii:: m::ii ..0.0.0.000.0.0... Public/Quasi-Public , ,,, ,,•:•••., „,;_4.4 .::.:.:.:.: : ::::.:.: Multi-Family .0.0.000 i0.00.00. --,, .:, 41.,•*!.,•i,,,,„its, . i, t„,,,t,,L . .. .• . 2,„,.w 'ff High Density Multi-Family :::::: . Light Industrial • L'i.k.,• .7 '\,_ . - . . ,1•0 ' ,..; .....i..i /,' , "-o 0, ,- ..!•.•.. .. • ..., '''''-' \*(5.4 - -- - •• I A • h) '.1...-.4'.1 ' 'f..]:'''.'..;:.t .4, • . " 0 ii , i.,t•,, 1";.•";SItA ..':" .• ''' rr-" Recreation ''• • I_1 ....1 :6` '• *0°0°0. Heavy Industrial 0 0 0 ,,,,,..,...,,,,•4 1.4...:,.........• ...„1. . .- ,•• • •••i 4 NA,., . tekt •. ,x 0.1.---- .. 's", "",' .'.' " ' ' •.. . , ••-- , ::- . ' -J• •. 1'.\ ' . . .. ,.s•:.;- .'' . Greenbelt_.,.,.. ..,...; ri . , , - Manufactung Park ... It.•'L''• , ., - ;., .....,,, . - - c, • , .• L........, ., • ',., •.' .- • / Multiple Option 1 - t,..,,,.„iy. ; ,•,,, • ., . 'chs.• tt-_.-_, •_•.„- .4, • • • • (.��•ti •/'___,_ y- + PROJECT: ,007LW�ECORPORATION °d(0-aU (gym[ 1_ �, \ \ \ \ p REM D. ASN1MLy0N 1,L�l i )•., Z �� .0 , \( \ ttN r \w MEP: MOBIL OIL CCRPDRd110Y s :Pi) a � �;• ;•' _ -• / `/ cj. \�- \ t\\,... (IR6(LPgiO.)aeSNINGf0a 9e0B) ♦2I/7 a . I ,.) • ,y, 11 F. ' ^` •/ 1af \,,\ \\ Ci°NiPCf28-0701 �aaMjYE A-$IINDIEf,�� ,a �IT[5J / �iv�.4\\1.�` \ APPLICANT/ENGINEER/AGENT: BUSH•ACED 6 NITCHINGS.INC. I ll g�' PI o Z I• * \ \ •• SEATTLE..NASNINGION 98102 l: 23-4144 CONTAC\ - s\ (206)T: LANES v,HARRISON Z��cc. . ./\ `fit �_` �� }[ " ,.". Tee.{...L-eft, V. �' \ rfvE DP[ONstaU[g0a: trvE It-N 1N0)1-SPRImILERED) a7• V�F}hit� EE • �•i• .L a,.e-ui« �a \ ` acwdac,CLASSIFICATION: 0.1 CA • �� 1 #\' �� 110.4 / ♦�6+'N / *�iN.� 4-',) \� Y'P � ZONING DISTRICT: W(BUSINESS) Z :, /._• / /1•h';• \ \4 4N TOTAL LOT AREA: 19,611 SDUNRE FEET•0.451 ACRES =� .'•A`.• �� a1r ,,E�/I�F +/ r r•�• S" BUILDING AREA: [FEET \'- .:,�. -..•.. ..t '4 R7 .�.� 'Il _ V� J .a ..�:♦� i♦ \ ,�'\t. �� 1.Oid SNaR F (�z ,�, h.�'��Yi�a{{\\jrjjL�i ;aa d .;y/�//`///�j Mrs ea•_o� a'O• \ iN • 'a.\ [ANCPt AREA: 2.d09 MARE FEET _ t �=T� " I rs.x.e.Am i� 'i. P,IRaI t PROVIDED: =d I',� .� 4 Nc STALLS Drtom: a:INCLUDES a AT vuaP ISLANDS) N i o �el'• \ �\ \ANDSC:INO MEA REOIIRCO: d.)DO SOVIRf F 1 1 P _. P. .. - KI�IM ITY M/N1s +) ��. \�• EE (e RI U ER l0 LOOT •J$ ♦ N .t•-a• H ? Nlalllw AROUND vEP1NE TER, LESS Ow • .u.a -Lard o � .�� } �,'•Q\\\\\\ \4 fP° DRIvEVAF OPENINGS) 2 1 1 l ♦ S LU 7 / • d e.+ • �\ Pd„ LJ •. NDSCING AREA PROVIDED: art0 SDUARE FEET Q z . • .;` . 4.4* $ '* 11/..L.K.y@y . 1 ,, L a. ♦�\� @v\ \�, S PROPoSED USE: SERVICE SiaTlDa > . / r; �� u..r \ VALUATION: 1}50.om.DD g s w > •j am' u aoa-l.rlccen es C g r • • \ r�F• MS aa.vlim y � `"`-. :•.is a �./ ( • •• I D♦.�DYD,r.,1131,CYIL?K " C TI, `:.. \ I)-....a.n.roll or hOC.11 dr(pp�..e r(wE nn w -. - • • • -�./ �' S \ \.\ e \ u:ic.".l t ii t�mwr•r.Fa`o'.ol"or:4a�a:/:.,a. L)I u ® • t,. • n•Ult er DATA \ `�`�% it, �' ' , y Q ; �O -\ �\ y \Fy n.f.I a e )I r ..m ro la n. tam F. • ..:�,1_�' '•;.::•..-.`�,::';,•: a•SOL I& Y 6 surer wm+.N " o\ aF r`.rfei¢:)uraad ua�.e�`nrc e.smfssf ru�w, �.19�.«9• , sic. � '' �°`.� (� _ _ : € \ �i • '� Ara::r..^ Io.�� ^�r�.^s�,aa);,�^N ;�^ Y ,y .{..�.I.. A• 1y• !gall Ia f4(It/G MVO,(WM Of UAL.5Mr 0I • I(Ltr� I ✓ �. • vis u. pos,,,d•S \:.:,' '\\\e;\ ' - •G .; �.':eu•. a - —� i- -- ..,"c".v IJ'y1al°�Oy \ P I • 11 R ' / ^ i/'C ! " ..tee Oy u7 r f .......4".. 1 ,D,ao D.ucw l m aa>amo \ .(� �`e • P. .s+e.l \ 1� 1., �p / /w/ , WtJDfD /` Wf.'O YMMRD I K•TMILC QIDIwD2t20lCUC. \ ` I K'O. ,e.o1uw e , �f , fie /�fvax cwue�--�\ �'o xoo.uwJ \ \\ I i I. Ili . : s , \ ,.. . __�`tiau.ee am..fa m Vv./ ' <e.u..,ss. '.\ I I. . (.' a i )V...o TV a.€cn - D / .Don aw rr -\ W CV♦D•a�.♦O w.1s..1m' - - - .; 9 :.a I♦ mil-'_ fn J Fr f 4 o • F s of " pVp '� �- • �a.� \ • i ; -1: �;' • r .. • O [fuY KM,Iffy-, J �.E. y LO aoc S L o �. .. Din�:; 3 g aN3 F • a il • }lr rs•_ .....4'Q'_ n'-e^ ` e..aN.v/..I, .w 'v 1` \\ F'i. . •N O Ir• 1� Ti , Z . .: ...•: .er way/i 1L __ { I .YNK•l. .lo.I�• . I ,II \\D' f - • Iu.uM wnuf uu Iwo. ! n (/,u•�C// \a \'t� `4 Re— iir .e. ld'core.u(Nat ^ ` •L < ^ seu..tuft, s- _ .., • - 1r' — .-.' IIVS•00• ii! /90.4.4 V. \�\ ram . .. .:: .( / O f.W `��111. S13 ' .. - _ , 1, \ — ) ---- _— ---- -- --�� ---wv-- -- --:� f0— -- —�— �.. • �L.'T•�V _ ..ECG - Z D e1AJ Ga ul f(.n1\ �\ \ _ } i6'A u 1e.4.7i \Lief,..,I.71 .. ._ • Qey,ru w.v. \ r( ty_Iw s�e.«r .adracr w wr xo••o• .-Q• R \ \ PN D J V Ld saw Df..srY o•1P.•Vb w p*s•eaD.I...raK wee.e.me.N A,c♦.+.n.•,.D Dee {! .o...w.Dw.r a.w..l ♦ \ f�`• ' I"N i0' ls•�•ef. N.E, SUNSET 0LVD. 1 1� \ 44 66050.05 -- 4. - - - CITY r tiNIO O-AGJ-P • .Er. L., . -.. YY PLANT SCHEDULE ':+`" pLAPdS7N0 DETAtfr9 ..eu F.7 •J•YMDOL DOT AN/CAL/ 5/ZE, GONO/r,ONS, +o -- •/± \ �a COMMON NAME REMARKS `.- o i . .- r ® _ r� ! I ILCR Rr/BPUM'..ti TJOER 6LOc'Y' Z'LIL /O"-/l"/+r,KELC !„t• .C/ \( •'+T•"0....... REO MAPLE BR44'MW 4 )Y'7•,•B•B Cl) ,U) �� 7i � �•iL'-T �I • \ /'/NUZ BANK5/ANA5.-6. e..NT,9PEL/MEN,B✓NY i _ -a KCMO✓E E)'/9r NO Z•LAL 9 wJ �•t•-" �J• a'''',,� t JALK P/NE TO BA'.AC.B•B, • {,.., 5qL` t,CL/1' T--e. d* �'�"y��.o .f • /Pi��, �•re iJ A�UOLNXI9 11W G 0 f . mil' r � o / j,v. '\t�\ ROLKERY WALLOW.) Z • x '� O 0 l` BUS M',FULL TO B.15 e, i'4-- CS' F ... ..l I � `l!s O TAX U9 OALdTARFpANGL`'W' LD-L/'. .' ^n .rJ L 9 �� \�-? \ F D ENOC/5N YEW B'B Uf 0 O - t - ' -� •� •'� ^_r / ��• 'f�\I\ \ EUUNYf/10U5 ALATA /L+-24•NT,MJL r/-STEMH6U Z 44.�4 O SL hFEL/MEN5 HALL-FORNEO,B•O ' _ b / }� ■l` • T o • \I wlN6E0 EUONYMOU9 N ' / 0. •�', - {• �j t' O o D •,k ,�\\• AWARFRD+R!)ERRY/' A'ANA ii•-15'NT,WELL AVIANL NEO, =m : _ ._ ♦ A• `''• O. ST.•MCTRLGAL Mee,B4B j ''`• O •�N- 9\ -/5'NT I./ELL dM/•GNEO, ,='." - -�`'+"`"�_`a•.-. ..dam �' OEKOCK,5 7WUNBG•Rra/ 'Z' Z �� •41, \� O Y SYMMETR/LAL FORM.B•B o 410,.. f N�•' �V �' ,,//PANG-..G BAROGRR t6) _ , 1� y� \. 4 ate' _ I: v 1.. ' ,• ••• ,-., / / .. ..`F-��: - � \ U9TU9 LODARiEN9/5 /z•-/5•Nr,M/N 2 La1L LONr o4 ¢� •i �L•O O I.. 1„....,4_,,„,,.,„ \ , O ROCK ROSG B4B.6YNMBTR/LAG iOfM. i /a-WY STAXV5PRe A6 ENC,L1 PANOENS' K•-75"Nr,BusNK FOLL rL nnT . r% (� �e• `\/ 11 SPREAD/N6 EN6LLON YEW B+SE,O•B,20•04L 9P4L/N6 m / !-'.,r• :.l. I ,, ^�1��,. _ • / ma//GWL.L6t?,N/N(I/z• a1 • NCCCRa NGUX•B9LT G7' j l ��' ' '� L RVNNERS SPREALHN6 STEMS, �� A iii '1 t • NGL/5N VT N//N211 ' . I. _ ,iAd/{^F/ --- ..r�% _,, \ ROW 12•/NS/OE LufBaFLG� // .N I I'C s � PLAP7YIAKS "ECIFtCAT1O S \" \ PE SAL NOTES III I / Of \\ 4LL SP4L/N4 A9 SNOWN ON PLdN UNLE73 NOTED _ = -Am/ `� I I . . . . IV -........s 1 . .".-•'t'"1•r,li: -:.=-;:•••-•.7.....T.="4.... . • . ... ...I\ ‘ \\ \ • .. ='`Cr....C.e=...-.—rz.....v.-. . s(' ft pp, \ ,...,.... „,,-.,-,..„., .. . .. ....—....,..„.....„......:,,. .......„... ... . . . ... .... . . „d&,..,,,,.., . ,. . . ... .. . ;c i.................1..,..,,,,.,. ,. ; ... • f. , • .. .• ... [..-.. .,. „. / . _ ............_ � \ , ,-----. .. ,,.....--......r......_,-.-:-:::.t.I.,...-;=. .7. . • / D fi// s •------(:, � \ /�� ! 1 � � � • �.. -r_wrw'er. 1 ' • ) am \\ ri \ g n \ \ %OI a Qryy '� • /s' i / • 1: f `.. id i 46 II ° '\r �"R.:�S�:r a.: n...,....rL..... .%/r 1� ,Y� °� - • \ w, �6. - . • • . . .. . . . % . ..44, •.iirgva,---iiistaNCINICIIIIN • •.]-—— '07 os. \ , I" IOCrKd7— L • N.E. lJ N 3 E '' &l-V D. i__ Jo-AcJ-L t �.--�J- ' . .. . ••.. . .-u II. I I I I.ViYL1 1 1l/1YJ 99 klcI NU I MN1 KUVED 1 6a2Az„,,,,,A.1))/eyjsie,c-z.„€,„,,,,,s2„,,,gele -4 II ♦n 66-1'1(:-,' 0 -- _ ' Or6 s 39e *1 '.. t;(jka ( '5 ) 44. 2-14,5x€4,-&-,x-S. Ir DATE: / /-36/0 3I ATURE OF DIRECTOR SR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1082 -- -- Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; (4'// 77)/ ju6/AZE /7y�� - fl APPROVED KAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS SNOT APPROVED IUT!W1!APPROVAL S'' . " LATE COWS AGREE;,;::_ NO , ___ .__�. _._ ... LATE CIS AGRcEFPE;;:_ 40 • SYSTEM DEVELOPM Cil:;' ui -lC:, E:a . - , ..�... a..:"'2/ Na�Pli title/ey/�il/e571 // �d'-�3 = r7-1 '�Z 72.- SVSTTEf1 EE NIEHT CHARGE-SE6'�E{i' ( 7 5. 7,z SPECL 1 P "` iT PI P CHARGE WATER ,ors* �/ e✓W±f�� S�AREA URGE-SEWER �� . i e ;S�`��_� J �n ,r s,) 'APProm uron HSI aka I i ++-"Wy �Mf'-if 1MI' wMl'.1r. 1 APPROVED Fin f7VORA1 a s'.cCt TZIS fM • NO b �+- ��.-, Z.' - . CT FIRE BUT. { FIRE F'L^'.7 ANALYSIS { 1.=� DO d 4 larb ^Sn1 Ur r�""rL1 Lk u4-s.t ci,3•a - 'i `' 0`m. , DATE: q ZS -,-(:)7-/::(1 ' IGNATUR;E • ''! "RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 ......._d_:±7: ----- --- .. sEVIE'rIING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : �,. PPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS r-1 NOT APPROVED . --__.._... ,------ /iv*-21a..(../e-p-.7 DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR. AUTH' ?TIED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 • 1. „• t' 1 .. I L , 7 n u I • • ja�/ 2.- DATE: ;I/�:. SIGNAT.tRE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1082 Form 182 P:EVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED E APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I INOT APPROVED LL) 4 i_c.l t1.1 / A/ _ )J • . —c-- DATE: � SIGNATURE OF Dp.EpOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1082 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; E APPROVED )6 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS INOT APPROVED PaT1X r. ,&\ -I„kyyvbrA Stet addTass s lE he lasted on ��6l Cr Catilasting color (V) in. . Pdrtabka tie ostingoisi arc repired T J r:) hooka! fiTO Additional l yaraets PC•,cd A)0 Firo lenos/Fig pones shall be inanced per Ord. 8,312 , Fire alert] system ru ed A. Pleas to sztzyticd l r a"fl l DATE : - • - SiG!'AT RE OF ;ii ECiOR OR -HJRI2ED REFREaEio 7,-;7= CE REVISION 5/1082 Form 182 •• • .j } ... REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1082 Form 182 EVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; n APPROVED [1] APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS © NOT APPROVED z x 3 L J D--e i a; F�'� _ __ I 3) &t. //,6/Fc • t w.x / • �h DATE: ;SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1082 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; �010 - APPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS E1NOT APPROVED 00 ` ) Y00'L L,kk1D56/\ 1 c 12 O u►i‹e0 PROPGRTm( 1.1 iti c 1G(`,(, • • o" DATE ; 9 - SIGNATURE OF DIREC OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 • Fnrm 182 I. [-APPROVED 1 ,..TADPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 1 poi AFFKUVLU --r) s:;.1,14,..,:)(1i. . . • :..) ..:-.. I , ) A 1 ' 1f l/ 1 C () --) ' • . . --: ' ... . '' ; ... .. , ; ,:- frle 0 $. -. -.6 .4/./Z.,-.),_?---J t \61Vi DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE / REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ( e...,.,,..„....„,. ?. 7..) [I] APPROVED I-1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS F1 NOT APPROVED ,,,,,, 3 y'''' e) S t-,4- ....... ' • I (2 VZ( ,s,/,;,--,_ 64,„.„ ,,__ c--6,...‘2 --. " ' u . . ,.. .., . ' 4) ) tt2-e____ & (-4-c• Cle''''.c..Z.ek,,e I .'.1 y DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 7) -1--REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 0( [11APPROVED EllAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS F-1 NOT APPROVED .- / - -(.- •, ,' • .,,_ ,:-.... ._, . i /(.-.--. . ) -7-. '---- .i ) /(/ /, / ". /.71 / '.: C,•-k T I, --, 7/ /..q..x; cc:TA Tr- ‹--/- L,lEj...:7 7):'.') (/ ,?f;C::.----• ,i.:.'(----- " : r- ;'-'" • • ' - • -! ,.r.,-1..)(.. .(:-_=_-.- cc) (i., ck z. . ). ) /, ----) ,/- ,..' 1 ) DATE : - - SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 „ r ' •1TOrt _ t ti . . f, `c,' _ \l '', 1 i •r ; Cpl. l • �.� t� 'i H '2 'GC YyI DATE ; - - - �iC-•: .2 S TURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : E APPROVED M APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS [1 NOT APPROVED _.vsi.o,CI 4/vnJ o f GI/0®E4- 67,eovz-s, %.vA-s ec/i%[ 64,cgy S .4A4. /9z,9c7/c•E5 sJ.vo /gsit'"O Q6.4r 7-6'e e-/ ,-. e . / r�9 A/,te 57da,sia.04,©s'. 2. /A/r .9-4)0 /'.'Piai /47.edo vc7- 45./ Fs7 s GcJ/c.s 03 E p o.vor 4.5 /-L4,P Si7 CO OeS 4)/ ' TEs i S „&drs cs c 7-5 /r=o,e ccJ sQ-2.0 .moo a ”-/.e'F A9Aeg/6At5 d"./c F /'/9,e/o,e / a A--,.Lti /.v/ O s' �,G a10 e/c/.. 3. ALA Pe//h s9ey RNA S'Co 4J p A Ay C 0 i 4,/ .v e.es GO/z/ .Q¢ 6'E,e i i F'ev /95 /o C v,r),A74 6 st; P,ec,Druc7- }-tip S o /.f /1. cwipx0of"a4ec" /rrde- MCP% tWie tA4 ' i s 20Qcs/R4-0_ DATE : - .iC-)/ i 9 7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Pct,krk-- 5 7 APPROVED [1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I INOT APPROVED CITY OF RENTON ` r. 164 i987 J and UUWLDr G / ZONING DEPT. } 7-' -- 2_,1 ( 7/7 rx-t- 'S DATE : Z �o 1/2 SIGi,�1TURE �F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 17 / , REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 2153N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-081 -86 APPLICATION NO(s).: CU-096-86 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for conditional use permit to allow the demolition of the existing service station and remove the old gas tanks and to rebuild a modern service station and convenience store. PROPONENT: Bush, Roed and Hitchings, Inc. (Mobile Gas) LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at S.W. corner of N.E. Sunset Blvd. and N.E. 12th Street. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this amended proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information including Description: Application for conditional use permit to allow the demolition of the existing service station and to remove the old gas tanks and to rebuild a modern service station and convenience store. on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Additional conditions were imposed as mitigating measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: • You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than April 20, 1987. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: March 11, 1987 PUBLICATION DATE: April 6, 1987 / k ' -Q), dnald G. Nelson Larl .,Springer 1)\ building and Zoning Director Policy Developme'ht Director Ric and C. ughton Public Wor Director OF I A 0IP .. a;,, ° BUILDING ZONING DEPARTMENT fe ' "*z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR �0 mom '� � MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 a 235-2540 94T�Q SEP-CE���P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR April 7, 1987 Mr. James V. Harrison Bush, Roed and Hitchings, Inc. 2009 Minor Avenue East Seattle, WA 98102 Re: Public Hearing - Application for conditional use permit to allow the demolition of the existing service station and remove the old gas tanks and to rebuild a modern service station and convenience store, file CU-096-86. Property located at S.W. corner of N.E. Sunset Blvd. and N.E. 12th Street. Dear Mr. Harrison: A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for April 21, 1987. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:DB:csb 3653Z lei,lovi. • OF R . , o ....... 9,0 `a' . 09xl. D, SEESE , City of Renton Land. Use Hearing Examiner will hold a „ t rti, J��LL+ �' +` W N `�. .: - i"�4 F' A . , , . ., . „ : . , .. . I. • ., . . • . . , ( , . , • .... • ... • in . • CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL •• • _ ON . APRIL 21, 1987 ' . BEGINNING AT 9 :00 . A.m.' P.M. C®NCERNINC: BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. (MOBILE GAS) APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STATION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS & TO REBUILD A MODERN SERVICE STATION & CONVENIENCE STORE, FILE CU-096-86. . ..5._... _ ,. tit.,4}'^• ;+ `•`' 14u1. 5,.' , : , '', „� . . ..�.......=.._.... ;` ero.. '. `fir\y-1; • _ :: . %l• A ,;' is ..,_— ,..u,—. , • }} ' N4.i.5,..,:... '. ' il .. • ,i',,,,!:.::.:T.7,/..,'. „ ...,. \ , ....... L • 1. : .i-f >1s.1 %:;`•>,•. ; II' . r / L..,r .,/0 .. i°;.$ - •i i " '. fir .. 1 is l7 °—.—.._. - • II ti , �"'i � Ii .' l l i , . ` ;\ <I. 41 • i. ::: : •, „1:, ........ .\ 7. • ,i..„; • , , .. S :, I „-... I+ ) ` Y :I' � i r , -- -- -=- ° %:/ ..... ., _ ,, ,....• „ h., ,,,• iiizr:1_ • .. ,.i. ,,..,; • „......,,,,, . , .. :,,,:,7..,,,,...r.,74., -. . _!:.i..-4, '_ (/' t jam: -.- _ - .1.: �. . 1 �... NE SUNSET BLVD "..___ - GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED AT S.W. . CORNER OF N.E. SUNSET BLVD. & N .E. 12TH ST. . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON • • . BUILDING &ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 • THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. ' r; P [U w 2153N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-081-86 APPLICATION NO(s).: CU-096-86 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for conditional use permit to allow the demolition of the existing service station and remove the old gas tanks and to rebuild a modern service station and convenience store. PROPONENT: Bush, Road and Hitchings, Inc. (Mobile Gas) LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at S.W. corner of N.E. Sunset Blvd. and N.E. 12th Street. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this amended proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information including Description: Application for conditional use permit to allow the demolition of the existing service station and to remove the old gas tanks and to rebuild a modern service station and convenience store. on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Additional conditions were imposed as mitigating measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than April 20, 1987. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: March 11, 1987 PUBLICATION DATE: April 6, 1987 l /7/7/A C) • (onald G. Nelson Lar . Spring -`Building and Zoning Director Policy Developme t Director . �L Ric and C. h1 ughton Public Wor Director • 3632Z NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CH-AMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON APRIL 21, 1987, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: THOMAS GARRICK (TALL FASHIONS NORTHWEST) Application for temporary use permit to allow a retail specialty shop for tall womens' fashions to be run out of a single-family house in a R-4 zoned district for a maximum of two years, file TP-104-86. Property located at 601 Burnett Avenue South. BUSH, ROED AND HITCHINGS, INC. (MOBILE GAS) Application for conditional use permit to allow the demolition of the existing service station and remove the old gas tanks and to rebuild a modern service station and convenience store, file CU-096-86. Property located at S.W. corner of N.E. Sunset Blvd. and N.E. 12th Street. T&E INVESTMENT, INC. (CUGINI PIT) Application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow the filling of a previously excavated gravel pit with 150,000 cubic yards of material, file SP-003-87. Property located at 2880 N.E. 3rd Street. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 21, 1987, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : APRIL 10, 1987 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, i3 r 'i "( 1. L ItJD , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARYBY THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in 2E Uro iJ , on the q f7t day of APe1 L, 19 s7 . _&9_1451 ._ P�-ecQo SIGNED: T. io/iess���s� E�1�1L`�, '0 wO T4 �'o v ° °• (�' 1 q°) °C •+1 °• 3, G�Ii OF° \'�)/° DOUBLE-WALL XERXES® FUEL STORAGE SYSTEM. CENTURY-CASTTMuL DOUBLE WALL UNDERGROUND STORAGE 014,10 � F • }A 7 :st 4 • CITY OF RENTON i1fl \ 11T JAN 9 0 1987 �--� CUILCiNG/ZQNIIVi Uci r. V-. - . . , ,, • 12,000 GAL. 37'-51/;'O.A.L. . 26'-51/8" 11'-01/8" 1 © — © 0 t 111)4. i • 1 co 6'-9%/e" 13'-95/e' . 23'-7%" 10,000 GAL. 31'-111/4"O.A.L. - 20'-11 1/e" 11'-0'/" . ' _0.. ti--r©. .. rr© .. _0 T C 114 • , ao • TT ---�— 13'-95/e" < 18'-1%" • 8,000 GAL. 26'-5'/4'O.A.L. 18'-25/e" • 8'-25/e'—] • • i T + 44 Km d 1\ --) Z . \ 1 1 • ---6'-9%" 11'-01/8" 15'-5'/e" • ( 6"NPT MONITOR/VENT(2"NPT& PLUG ON PRIMARY TANK) • © 22"DIA. MANWAY WITH 3 FITTINGS IN EACH COVER 10. 1 HOLDDOWN STRAP LOCATIONS(OPTIONAL) GAUGE PLATES UNDER ALL MANWAYS • 1 F HOLDDOWN CLIPS LUG MONITOR TE — M ,r�, 7—LIFT pa r=r r-'r- FITTINGSST (---- a:11 . a] GENERAL ARRANGEMENT 300 0 •Qr 0 / 73/4" 73/4"9 • d N V <J <J co (elriP, g 4"NPT FLAT „R `� e "' TYPE FORGED 4"NPT FLAT FLANGE TYPE FORGED .� 304 FLANGE 22" MANWAY COVER WITH 22" MANWAY COVER WITH FITTINGS SPACED AT 120° INLINE FITTINGS 28"O.D.73/4 73�4' 6" T . NPT�\ ,.SECONDARY 1 FITTING TANK J ,�ate„�a4 '� , -7", SECONDARY / ' TANK ',Y,, , '''r '�.`I SE PRIMARY ,,(s\\,,,,.,, ++ _ 2"STD. NPT _/ TANK l; PRIMARY FITTING WITH TANK COUNTERSUNK 22"I.D. RELIEF HOLE PIPE PLUG . 22" DOUBLE WALL TANK MANWAY MONITOR FITTINGS V . - 'SPECIFICATION GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS-DOUBLE WALL FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC(FRP) UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SHORT FORM: B. Product Storage: The contractor shall provide Double Wall Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic(FRP)U.L. 1• Tanks shall be capable of storing petroleum with specific gravity up to 1.1. labeled underground storage tanks as shown on the drawings.Sizes and fittings 2. Both primary and secondary tanks shall be individually vented to atmo- shall be as shown.The tanks shall be Century-Cast"Tanks as manufactured by spheric pressure.The tanks are not designed as pressure vessels. XERXES CORPORATION. 3. Tanks shall be capable of storing gasoline or gasohol(10%ethanol and gravel or crushed stone as specified in 90%gasoline mixture),jet fuel,diesel fuel,AV gas,potable water at Tanks shall be tested and installed with peaP ambient underground temperature or fuel oil at temperatures not to exceed the current installation instructions provided with the tank. 150°F. C. Each tank shall be equipped with two 22"I.D.manways.Each steel manway LONG FORM: Section 15177-1 cover shall have three 4"NPT fittings welded in place. D Part I General D. Materials: 1. Tanks(Primary and Secondary)shall be manufactured with 100%iso- 1.01 Related Work Specified in Other Sections phthalic polyester resin and glass fiber reinforcement with no sand fillers. A. Liquid Level Gauges:Section 15174 E. Annular Space B. Plastic Pipe:Section 15064 1. Tank shall have a space between the primary and secondary shell walls to C. Anchor Bolts:Section 05501 allow for the free flow and containment of all leaked product from the primary tank.Space also allows the insertion of a monitoring device D. Cast-in-Place Concrete:Section 03300 through a monitoring fitting. • • 1.02 Quality Assurance F. Tank Dimensions(Refer to Xerxes literature on gallonage). A. Acceptable Manufacturer:XERXES CORPORATION 1. Tanks shall have nominal capacity of-gallons. B. Governing Standards;primary tank 2. Tank shall have nominal outside diameter-feet. 1. ASTM standard document number D4021-81. 3. Tank shall have approximate overall length of-feet. 2.•Underwriters Laboratories,Inc.(U.L.)File MH 9061(N)for storage of flam- 2.02 Accessories mable liquids.A U.L.certification plate shall be attached to each tank. A. Anchor Straps-Provide FRP anchor straps as manufactured by tank manu- 3. National Fire Protection Association(NFPA30)Flammable and Combus- facturer.Number and location of straps shall be specified in current installa- tible Liquids Code and(NFPA31)Standard for Installation of Oil Burning tion instructions of tank manufacturer. Equipment. B. Manways 4. National Sanitation Foundation,Standard 14. • 1. All manways to be flanged and 22"I.D.complete with U.L.listed gaskets, bolts and covers.(30"I.D.manway is also available.) 5.1 Factory Mutual Systems approval J.I.1G4AO.AF. 2. Location as shown on drawings. 6. Military Specifications No.MIL-T-52777(A). 3. Manway extension tubes shall be FRP and 24"long for manways shown C. Governing Standards;secondary tank: on drawings. -1 1.,Underwriters Laboratories,Inc.(U.L.)File MH 9061(N)for storage of Elam- • 4. Each steel manway cover shall have three-4"NPT fittings welded in i mable liquids.A U.L.certification plate shall be attached to each tank. place. 2. National Fire Protection Association(NFPA30)Flammable and Combus- C. Fill Tubes tible Liquids Code and(NFPA31)Standard for Installation of Oil Burning 1. Tubes shall be FRP and factory installed by manufacturer. Equipment. 2. Location as shown on drawing. 1.03 Submittals • 3. Tubes shall be 4"diameter with 6"steel fitting and a 6"x 4"double tapped A. Shop Drawings:Contractors shall submit-copies of shop drawings for reducer bushing. • each tank.Drawings shall show locations of all fittings,accessories,and crit- D. Gauge Plate-Shall be installed at location shown on drawing. ical dimensions. E. Heating Coils B. Catalog Data:Contractor shall submit-copies of manufacturer's litera- 1. Heating Coils shall be installed in a separate 22"manway and shall be ture to include-copies of manufacturer's current installation instruction. standard items supplied by tank manufacturer. 2. Location as shown on drawings. Part II Products F. NPT Threaded Fittings 2.01 Double Wall Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic(FRP)Underground Storage Tanks 1. All threaded fittings shall be a material of construction consistent with the with a Primary(internal)tank and a Secondaryrequirements of U.L.label. (external)tank. 2. All standard thread fittings shall be half couplings and shall be 4"in diam- A. Loading Conditions-Tank shall meet the following design criteria: eter.Reducers are to be used for smaller sizes where shown and provided 1. Internal load:Primary and Secondary tanks shall withstand 5 psi air pres- by contractor. sure test with 5 to 1 safety factor.Contractor shall individually test tanks 3. Sizes Standard Other Sizes prior to installation as this is to test for leakage.Maximum test pressure is Fill 4" 5 psi. _ Gauge 4" 2. Vacuum Test:Every tank shall be mercury vacuum tested by the tank Inlet 4" manufacturer to assure structural integrity.Primary tank shall be tested to Outlet 4" 11.5 inches and secondary tank tested to 9.5 inches mercury vacuum. Vent 4" 3. Surface Loads:Tank shall withstand surface H-20 axles loads when prop- 4. Suction Line-Shall be installed by contractor on site.Pipes shall termi- erly installed according to current manufacturer's installation instruction. nate a minimum of 4"from bottom of tank 4. External hydrostatic pressure:Tank will withstand 4'of overburden with the 5. Return line shall be installed by contractor. hole fully flooded with a 3:1 safety factor against buckling. G. Monitor Fittings 5. Tanks shall support accessory equipment such as heating coils,drop 1. Tank shall have two test monitor fittings consisting of a 2"NPT fitting on tubes,submersible pumps,ladders when installed according to tank manu- the primary tank and a 6"NPT fitting directly above on the secondary tank. facturer's recommendations and limitations. 2. Tank shall have two monitor fittings,one near each end of the tank. , • xEsucEs . _.,) CORPORATION 7901 Xerxes Avenue S., Minneapolis, MN 55431 •• (612)887-1890 D.W.7/84 Manufacturing facilities in Anaheim,CA•Bartow, FL•Seguin,TX•North Ridgeville,OH•Penns Grove, NJ H. FIBER-TRENCH Inc. 45581 Industrial Place, No.1 Fremont, CA 94538 (415) 490-2333 FIBER-TRENCH is a fiberglass trench liner for secondary containment and leak monitoring of underground piping. FIBER-TRENCH is a complete line containment system. The straight sections, elbows, tees, 45°s, and parts for dispensers and turbines assure complete containment, from under the dispenser to around the turbine. FIBER-TRENCH is available in 15", 20", and 30" widths to accommodate from one to seven 2" lines. FIBER-TRENCH is gasoline and gasohol resistant. All system components are made from the same type anti-corrosive resin as fiberglass petroleum. piping and tanks. FIBER-TRENCH is the most economical and reliable complete piping containment system on the market. Its modular design assures quick, trouble-free installation, and ordering components is as easy as ordering pipe. In cities where a water test is required, FIBER-TRENCH is clearly superior. Inspecting agencies in numerous cities have voiced a preference for FIBER-TRENCH because they can be assured that the integrity of the system will not be destroyed during the piping process. Cities and counties have shown their preference by installing FIBER-TRENCH in many of their _own fueling facilities. FIBER-TRENCH fully conforms to California underground storage tank regulations and related health and safety code sections. FIBER-TRENCH, INC. provides on-site installation training and contractor certification at no cost. CITY0FRENTOIC D N _ ! JAN 2 01987 DUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Q.Q QJ . l - Oil Companies Currently Using Fiber-Trench: Mobil Texaco Union Shell Wickland Arco Chevron Desert Petroleum Beacon Exxon Olympic Kayo Major Corporations: Westinghouse Pacific Gas & Electric Hewlett-Packard United Parcel Service Delta Airlines City and County Agencies: Santa Clara County Transit District (Fueling Facility) City of Mountain View (Fire Dept.) City of Palo Alto (Fire Dept. ) City of Vallejo (Dept. of Public Works) City of Fremont (Corporate Yard) San Francisco International Airport (Aircraft Fueling) Government Agencies: Lawrence-Livermore Labs (U.S. Government) Mare Island Naval Shipyard Fiber-Trench Installed and Approved in the Following Cities: San Jose Cupertino Vallejo Palo Alto Milpitas Sacramento Sunnyvale Fremont Bakersfield Santa Clara Newark Morgan Hill Mountain View Livermore San Francisco Saratoga Hayward Gilroy Los Gatos San Leandro Crescent City Los Altos Alameda Stockton Redwood City Richmond Danville Burlingame San Luis Obispo Grass Valley r CO L U M B I A (707) 585-0131 RESEARCH $;*TESTING Lat P.O. BOX 968 • SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA 95402 December 11, 1985 Fiber-Trench, Inc. 45581 Industrial Place #1 Fremont, CA 94538 Attention: Andy Anderson Re: CRT #85127 Gentlemen: As requested, physical and mechanical property testing was performed on Fiberglass samples provided by Mr. Andy Anderson of Fibertrench, Inc. The tests were conducted by Columbia Research & Testing personnel at our Laboratory in Rohnert Park, California, in accordance with applicable ASTM Test Standards. The test results are included in this report. If you have any questions, please feel free to call our office. Thank you. Respectfully submitted, OLUMBIA RESEARCH & TESTING es A. Long aboratory Manager JAL:sm Enclosure LABORATORY & OFFICE LOCATION: 5865 LABATH • NO's 1 & 9 • RO.HNERT PARK, CALIFORNIA 94928 CQi1. YMBIA R SAR - .i & TUSTIN ° December 10, 1985 CRT #85127 PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTY TEST DATA Prepared for Fiber-Trench, Inc. • Material - Gel-Coated Glass Fiber Reinforced Polyester Resin • ASTM Test Designation D2584 Glass Content (Percent by Weight) 37.6 % Resin Content (Percent by Weight) 62.4% D792 Density 1.39 Gms/cc I . D638 Tensile Strength 16,930 PSI • j D790 Flexural Strength 29,620 PSI D790 Elasticity, Flexural 1,993,480 PSI D695 Compressive Strength 14,820 PSI D2583 Barcol Hardness - Face 39 Barcol Hardness - Back 50 , .. , ... . _ . (rZ:1114) Chemicals Division of United States Steel • IRADMARK . - USS CORROSION GUIDE ADDENDUM PAGE* ' -— •++.r^ ., '.,"4 —,<-':: .l rlol:;.'S:a Si:' '17:'' ':i'.`r�,i-V ,.:47,,^f.t pp�< ft�i}; ."4.•^,1•.�Q7.-:;ts^ii�v �k�i•r .0 '<H% .5.,t:.- «:4 :{:1"-1' !.:.+.... .f` " C9 t��y; � J- ''u.1 n` %#t: .,"{rY. 1 al �,�'"V. .!34" h...J"'t •,C. �'�'_ �•1,,.'l,*_ l ."} '4'4�':�'.i�!'r.di•+•;a�,.+"eii;r"+,-,;•r� .r,1'.t ., .,.s?�> Zii.. "�:� .t'v'C'" JiE`..=,v .,.rs:�.fr�:4 '>� inn^,vl't,t.,��� r..4'Jr.Yi•.,65..ra.,r,• z6 � 7,, i 57+,,. .:1.. 4.G .,G,.,.. iq+,r;t '-S+'. ,:ito?d,:'.'--b'; r'`�� ,vr•_;�:.�'i';\`.^ yt• 5.�.".ti:r"� R '� ^,es:.d� 1• i, •: ". ,t: ��,rr ... at:.,r c. '�4.. -„' ,7 tt •;i K,;;,a,-'1T' r'Yf+:,' •;�,r: • • • • Maximum Service Temperatures.. F. A. . .. o cen-' 4, l" C MR 14042. 4.1.; ,'Chemical tration ..MR'122931. .._::MR 14059 MR 13029 .y Enu'• ronment °/ M 1 r, t c,'. .: goo, ""'.5 j;,0,1; -*'.carbon Tetrachloride • 1'00 r; 75 120 le 'F� ,',l Diesel Fuel •2;•,i' �aria 1,,=q,�; ,• ' :.;,fF,. „ ;:: 95 75 125 :.t ' ,Y?-:.;f_: ,yea; z, :. !:,, ,,, P ,,6.{y1 ;:r4 it r� '"4 ''•.4t ':'4•, }•Y.x.�r:f i,,'r';`,, 'y.� r.;;'*.,., .1c•" "`e ' _:ii,: ;„f:'` �. ;', �;u'u. �, e j ' . 120 170 �r'�nFu��'�,�x:'r'', eN. c,,:fi;.. rP'-:,�,°..�•�:?yr, {�ter:;;100��� '=:�,� 170 ;•:� ' #r,;;-,Sli',..i.f;a;u .r . f; •1t-,t.,. "• .,.,• ya', xt,:,?:,ii ,;:w' •`,'i::�Y.i�' ,�;•i`i, . ;>,;'GasoI ne':All Types` ::''= ;;^._ ;y'=;'.• \ J00',''�:Y.:; 130 100 . 170 1:q,: 10 il,a�y. ut'-,Fuel:(JP 4); -.; : 100 '=,4 170 120 — °`a%'- :y� ay::'Yi;'';'i3:: �^q'.ifv Fh. ::; ' ,t•. •i'ti�' :�t'li o•:<t�':ri 1•:`,10 .i r�,w '..+�' a't3,-, �rw"` t'N :�`h'" ��i t;r,.,Fa�S;�,' ,;f;"•4 s;�%.,� tit:a%?,:"::i,.":..:i). - .,•'•.v :'f,, :Jt:,y ., ;;'•+'•9 .)..;:f f,:,:;,:�'ii if. Ci,'?:i+, �jit':r.ai�... .,df:r' ;r1f"�'•t l,. :.%;.:vr•�'-✓ t`'`F 6 '`£•Ct��:t�'-S+i'.,.5,.5c;..t'i.k t,,`:' ��' i::�s`�, ,. -. iti•,i,'C,r' -��°{:r • .;t:: r'ri_ -=4. :•1 L`= ; ,fir,.:'>w.y, : ,?it -;n;'.;;'';';''6 r.::;?, r,:M 4-< Yam'-i; rr,4 "y;t V A;�:,�3 i , ;7rK;, , . .;ji» ,;.f,•,. $,tr:; •' .4:; }j a• "���"`�i3' .5ar�� <•f>,'�3 ,ti w'xajG•.r", a�•,�:j�:•q•�'��i,p.:,X. ,•9".r:�`V Ew;q.:S`.,�:��:%''"+ �T • 4Ti.t ell'.•:^':..Yet 1.3`S.t''' r4'1 %:f. "k l;,•.�' 0P!„r' ; :). •";',P. i:",�i�3•. t �fiFtT P.'JlF^::.`�:':': 7) S ii: ,'t.::".4:-1.,Y-,�::n, `'(✓:)' ` _ :•.0 • X�% , '.f'r:>" ,;tit {`•�"i { Y; i`r i .;',"`,• L u:o..:+ t''. :.*'. - `i - - ti ate ;rt`},: ;:F,�:�y„ ='+f:.,:.,�Cf" .'cr,rnY:-";"�i�r,"7l. ,•�;::ti; ?.1 "3;,.::+;:1 •ids H � ri;:i.::J�:'t.$r.�: '�,?,:•t Y; ,S- '':"''�`�i� :�"';:;:..5• J:'c..� `i,j 'rra:` x. -;5S D •>.# at-'. .':'': '•,:�i......`.T ri,4`.} �`%.:_?;:.'„, aSywy.,`-" `!;'' k�,;tr Yk^`.Y.a 1y, ', vifx'":',;AY. •:;a:, `I''.��;r -h;.'.;..'T. ', t r::A':. y'4,t31•+`'`{�•�+;,„y b F : ! . {'ti.'`^„"`.':1_r , i�'t Yro °^{',"Yi'.'r";.` . :,,> i j.:.9.. ..!„n16 l' '� ,ii ::r',n r :j.,: t ''�',r' d lr�.5iy4�'$?µ,:,'�,'`.,�".?rrr,.y; eipi.;• t:t`'� ,4"Y i i''':,...s:'>:'`.4 ,...,. 'w,J,`r t E f:rd, .F'ri.."+' 'r.X_,,.',;i:t. ,:,,, '''f., ,•szti, - .:sv,,,.,• ,,,t1;s.;':rr.,R,� sq,,.tCdc`C,R;. Af'•,.:a,� ,,, S,41.'i.,,V. � .i'k„a_� F.i: t, ,'1'"'r' .. ., a... `:;�w:°:e.`'t� :K..r..; L,,-... :t i ...r;.r.''>a ..s:rMi`r..>.nA�;-.uy�:t.'. `�i.'i ._'t�,.. ',"a..�.J'a.s?'•":`�Y.,rt, a ,-a`- �'yi��r�="�?•,�Y� o,,,yyY;,r�ic'airr�� 3 t.; ,mot ,y .+,,.;E.lYrrf`1ia•. '.�+.Y.: + `:•- -.4 . :r. h " li'.'S+•,r.,v: "s° - 1�t.� ����'",,, yr..7:.1' f,. _ '{.'•:i°+w; � i :��`' r".;,a.^:.' ,y.,-:i'i.�y�,l�tt_�C_.r�,,';%+h rl,'t;:•v 7y'{it: xe;: "'�;3 'tr�;;:�'x, •,�i�� �,"..,�.- w,7`'^1t '�: '.1'n"'••'.'.. -,ki;-t3,•=..5 °� - '-`. :L- ;..1 ;.;.i �.rf..,.,asi3.e. `�,v. �'.r. fii,', s+,v NiYl%v,H .y-$;>:0� # t,Sfl: i`;'r-,it^ft,K.,w.+.*t :•r:�.., ';C.,,ili - ,. N�_,, ^,N.!.0a4n; �':GX ,^- �^ 'atv t �. .� = '�:++..f• :�;;'�� �. ' .r c;c-rt:�.r�,�y ��'�zy ���'"��^, ,t�'�;�`:'`t, ,�6;vs z..", rr e: o Ina...: Cli icaIY o '.;i..., �. �':y,. t`.z ', 't. �" s fah � a ,xe 2. ,w:�;,r�'..�.�:s�*iS:t�'•.��''#'� �i�'• ;�:> ���-��+ � 3'S$a 1605 West Elizabeth Ave., Linden, NJ 07036 (201) 862-5600 • IMPORTANT NOTICE • . The information and statements herein are believed to be reliable but are not to be construed as a warranty or representation ' •• for which we assume legal responsibility.Users should undertake sufficient verification and testing to determine the • - suitability for their own particular purpose of any information or products referred to herein. NO WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE IS MADE. • Nothing herein is to be taken as permission,inducement or recommendation to practice any patented invention without a • • license. • Polyesters Techrdc. Informätiom MR 12293L Isophthalic Corrosion Resistant Laminating Resin MR 12293L is an isophthalic polyester resin based on MR 14042 specially formulated for use in hand lay-up, spray-up and filament winding corrosion resistant applications. The resin is pre- promoted and thixotropic. MR 12293L is excellent for applications requiring chemical resis- tance with recommendations listed based on laboratory tests and field results. Confirming tests under the actual exposure conditions are recommended where variations from test conditions are encountered. TYPICAL PROPERTIES OF LIQUID RESIN Brookfield Viscosity, 25°C.,cps 400 Specific Gravity,25°C. 1.04 Thixotropic Index 2.0 • Color Hazy Pink Uncatalyzed Stability, Min. Months @ 25°C. 3 TYPICAL CURING PROPERTIES Gel Time Data (1% MEKP-60, 25°C.) Gel Time, Minutes 14 Peak Exotherm, °C. 177 Total Time to Peak, Minutes 25 TYPICAL PROPERTIES OF 1/8" UNFILLED CASTING Flexural Strength, psi. 18,400 Flexural Modulus, psi. x 106 0.50 Tensile Strength, psi. 10,000 Barcol Hardness 45 Heat Distortion Temp., °C. 98 Water Absorption, 24 Hrs., 25°C.,% • 0.20 Elongation, % 2.4 Chemical resistance of glass reinforced polyester laminates depends on the polyester resin protecting the fiber glass reinforcement, thereby maintaining the laminate integrity. Variables in construction and curing the laminate, stress conditions in service and operating conditions • • are extremely important, therefore, proper fabrication techniques as specified by the National Bureau of Standards P. S. 15-69 should be employed to obtain adequate service life. Results obtained with this data cannot be guaranteed and final determination of the suitability of any information or material for the use contemplated or the manner of use is the sole re- sponsibility of the user. Chemicals • 1605 West Elizabeth Ave., Linden, NJ 07036 (201) $62-5600 Division of United States Steel Ions USS isa registered trademark . t • . , - 000) FIBER-TRENCH Inc. , yl - 7" SE cried k • Afryi 1 .244.1 • —lc-- sa-Conl DA2Y CONTAINMENT . . TPDCA k ti 5 rr . O I . rilizStAkEkix sEct: j_, -..ks ..,.,..z.y." .,..;. . , 'AIN 45° SECriall vi ,I CIO° SEcr, , 1111 I. 0 E/JD en p --7r-- 4 to o • v 1% 11 - F.61 14 P. DISFIR.46ER PAtil 1 P 14 4Z 9 CROSS SetT. iii . -...x... !oleo 14L jollki4v 1 - n •-.AL__ _ni _I( 30, -----r ' I • .r:1.IIIIIIIIMIIII- re•..4.--- . el .441111111111 , • FIBER-TRENCH Inc. 45511relnmdouns A ttrial Place, No.1 , C 94538 i AffIzove) OP Roo- • viRARL.44 10. 'quo P7,4v-IITzkLA/JD • M.PD. PANI sems: uo...),_ . 14_, ..4.1,__:______ t401,1E • m al^ -BA sr3ed . • 4111*e • • 100.1111Z0111"" " • Cligfeaft /{nr rxa.�p I _ -I „ _., • ..... /-.............„..r..1) . ........."........"(\. ais vr be eh. ... i / •.n c.e•eaawc e IV �,, eier QIN Vag ....----: f • �tr, y VC +�c .o.+ sr 111.11. T s ILL .amid • ?p•[C[.C.L CC �7 ,r�.[. Tj Lc[.et Setr.p� ri+u •? ffte�-•+ c+•fl RY► Neu, ca.'act' WK.[C�ti R bs 6.t !a�.L`5 CSC< M.4 Si�orq.t ors. OOi se.0 cJ'[emu! we ' PM Zr_ wlcb v...........M�..,lb outs M! ...1.4.6J QPJt&D • • TYPICAL F.R_P. FIBER - TRENCH INSTALLATION • 1 I i . . ,...,...:,. __.•` , • , . r ' k ' ! . 1 - i ' . ..,...' lel M L. t*.41 N I kl lit.4. .. . .,.''. rot,y PRor,LeNE 5i-IET 5NTIF-STROUai-1 e5GT1ON . k4.t,i-- 56 -TH oRo UGH LY - • c-<%IveZE-4.7 it, rRa\PENT 1k - kb \\\\\\...1 • \ . • .... RUN-OFF klATEfC INTRUSIoN. \ -. ... . \.4 • ' •• 0 .. ,, . -- airdlr..1774', - - . dir " •1 • AI ° s - •••" '-'1...'1".$4,;". .•• --4104Z /• •-• • 0 • --- 4p - 40 • 4' e(0/11 ..1.:7...•-. -•• • ..v:-* :1 4 \4 • \lly 1 I -49.1.. ...4•:,:. .. • - - ., ' \)=" \' ,,...6•11, '). 6'.. . . . \fr , •. __-_,..--, ) .-- co_451, .- • , ) grik>i‘ / .•,, I s -1 I ' •1 . f);-"•• ' • . I ji)_ . • .1 .1, 0 0 0 0._ \ % \ i ,. _D. : , Or •-4164. g'' : ••• • ' Is or • • #•\ ' - •C'/ a. • . 1 0 . . ,, .AV. I, • i 1 .0 1• , ...\\Cy A6p2ayattsA. 'IC e . .10,i\.\fV°‘/ i f?\k' • . , . \ T i2+5N CO 14 6;.e.0 5 HAL.I. : E3a M431 .r0.4 Ai4C, FLAT TO TKENcA4 PETAIL: - 17F-42\/125 PULL. 5urroer ,N.Nct o rEA GR.16.•veL MAY e5E REatokao. . . ..... . . . . . . . • . . . , . . , 1 • • • it _ ���,111111 1 T • • i trim it -7 a-- if, , -- - . / . . ,7. . . .,:. ...-..mmillh. illrf/y/ . / / , • i TANk w ILi- e.a U r PPED H iTN A STUDDED M^N►,1A`l LILT AND CLAW r46 RING. TR7U&14 • • Is Tv 15E FIELD MI l7 , GLUED AIJ0 et:LTED • To 714E T/NK . GoNNF-cTIoN 1 ' TD E, M7E jN • Ac-6.0RDANGE WITH MANUPAGTUREWS 5t'rGIFIG,AT IOW. • ii8 4 PUMP 0 TAIL • . • rt 48/ts.‘ PUHP wall' • (8"TANJK 5LA5 /EAK t ETEC 70at Ill,.6..1ruuV.r.4. C RD WAJ(it' .4 /I--------.. . o_r cv—t: 9"GAL.✓. R 15� I Sp • �'E Z�CTCR ,. - . • • . oak .ar-i 2 Fig e>z4 L 4 5 5 PEo/xsc r PIPE ►A:14 1 ✓FN-rFi5Fle6L.ASS % Pill Mk *64 41 r42',c3o'171EP ►f' F 15ER4LASS F5J1( Srcr. 22.,�HAti W4 y/�NID CJ °`� •r6-.—_ • •' - - - - - -- - -�i. - - — ;. 1 I -Daff3LE 'NALL PljePEyLIKS 4"etittk• PL,1tk,E VI/TN I 5TORA6E TANK 776+47E4 DC. JN tdClc R//JC7 .4 • ----- ' - • • _7`//PEAD�T /N511)� ` / FIf3eY4tA Sr=�tIO�J _ _ SOCK JzWEj Ccc-IFRESS/ Rin* �FIP�IZC.,LAss Mow SatTIOL4 .22 IJAiJ JA'f LJ AIL FLANcF l 'A(G 6.4stE75 F: -Excess FrSe•- LAss 61-U E 11 L/ LAAr.„NAy AT tax McNT" R/Ncy -EL.- -_ = t ?--• µids+ 1.1p54£aS k 1 f iNW G1)--_________________________________: DATE: DRAWN BY APPROVED Y• N � ,�4� s, �QB� k,2t� D, T .e/ �� TYPICAL QONNECTIOs`�j,= ?„ REV1,4�Q t_7' • AT TANK NIANWAY FIBER-TRENCH Inc. DRAWING NUMBER C4L_I5Egr- _ CH b_75PEg GLASS LTENCH LLNEE JOINT. " OFiberglass trench liner O Isophthalic resin, fiberglass dust and mill fibers mixed to paste form - by Fiber-Trench O4-inch fiberglass tape _ OIsophthalic resin • OE 3/16 x 5/8 aluminum pop rivet (approximately 9 per joint) 0 ' (§> O . j . . , 3„ -).-1 . . _ , . i 0 • . , . . -,y : .1:„,‘\\\\\VNO\ \W, \ 44-e; --f„7„/„.,,,,,,,,,,,,i -r - \\ K 1 S ayi `✓ i i f . ''1'_ a s • .� lr ., •• . .� � .. f w N. r. \ G 'M . :i 1 AP.:. `•L si' •„ 'i1. ..., ., y 1. ••if t Ai 44. •Y v• : v T • • • • • + , •. _ e_ iti. - -�"' - »��.�c_ f''•�7rt•.,.. .9w ,Jr _ " i:. j< - f. `+tr ,^ . . � '_ rf .r_._ r .c!►,.,�Li s a 'µ t Wksn 7 •- • j _ _.'¢ 1 lX.�g.*.t�„b4._ w-� � .r ,s t"►lt' . •:--M ��. c • • • • -.yn w• •�, t Y ` ram -' '4 't.... i .: vi ces-+•- - - _ •�, - eta' y+ kr.- te •. .....y j •,:: `'' / _ _ 'W1•' -- 'a- -A. all ri: i j i ,f• ' ' 0 { y ilif. h 1. i:�}. �• r,p A,.. r dr . I ' -. .. .: ' Z '.. .t... ',. , ::,- . 'J.-. '------__ ,...„.I'lz?,—.:,-.':-14: 'PrIt,;..- .:. • 4:i:if .i ;:-:I. ..1 43#I fk •. • , �y y� `y W w ,� •t •I� . k , I iljr..,''I:. C:'4•111L'P7'A _ ....____. 1.. •' ; •,.,a �; N 1„,,:,,.,.:" ,( Via- r. / „ i 4.,AF '''':V..\41*I.: -; . 1 ^ tir.. t'41. 1. ` i,, ,`I► . � t 4s .Z y � h t 11 J rJ .� I. ' . 4 r i rra t$i1-�fr r ~.�' 5,...„.. 4-c,,?:.: _. . . ..... , .. ff 4. 74c, '' 1 . r1 al . r i •"•i i ' : '��,.-.its-'"": .. ' i . '; &,),CV,!„101.f.-fl...-444v.",. ::-- - ..' `_. t. ____,\- ...1 FY ,, saf,, . • .. r! . . __ :41i' ,.., , p a { { r).'. • r • ` • '4'' l Y T 6 c� '�� ,,' WARRANTY FOR FIBERGLASS UNDERGROUND PIPING CONTAINMENT SYSTEM The following warranty constitutes our exclusive obligation and we make no express or implied warranties, or any warranty of merchant ability or fitness for any particular purpose whatsoever, except as stated below. We warrant that all component parts of the Fiber-Trench system, if installed underground with proper backfill and otherwise installed in accordance with our instructions: 1. Will meet our published specifications and will be free of defects in materials and workmanship for three (3) years following date of original delivery from Fiber-Trench. 2. Are.manufactured using isophthalic, polyester corrosion resistant resin. 3. Will not fail for a period of thirty (30) years from date of original purchase due to external corrosion; and 4. Will not fail for a period of thirty (30) years due to internal corrosion, provided the system is used solely for gasoline, gasohol (90% gas and 10% ethanol mix), AV gas, jet fuel, kerosene, diesel fuel, or potable water at ambient underground temperatures. Our liability under this warranty shall be limited to, at our option: 1. Repair of defective system section. 2. Delivery of replacement system section to the point of original delivery. We shall not be liable for any labor, other installation costs, indirect or consequential damages, or environmental damages, costs or clean-up expenses in connection with the trough system. 000J • - FIRER-TRENCH Inc. 45581 Industrial Place, No.1 Fremont, CA 94538 (415) 490-2333 . PRICE LIST Straight section (16'1X30"wX20"h) 575.00 T section 135.00 90° section . . . . 160.00 • 45° section 115.00 Dispenser section, 3' 95.00 Dispenser section, 4' 115.00 Dispenser section, 6' 130.00 Tank turbine box 320.00 MPD section 160.00 End cap 35.00 Cross section 135.00 * 20"w straight (16'1X18"h) 428.00 * 20" T section 75.00 * 20" 90° section 75.00 * 20" 45° section 70.00 * 20" end cap . . . . . . . . . .. . 25.00 32" dia. turbine box 160.00 ** Mini-straight (12'1X15"wx16"h) 195.00 ** Mini-tee 50.00 ** Mini-90° 55.00 * Designed for use where up to 4 lines are to be contained. ** For 3 lines. 000 2154N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of NON-SIGNIFICANCE for the following projects with additional conditions imposed as mitigating measures under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) of the Renton Municipal Code: ECF-081-86 BUSH, ROED AND HITCHINGS, INC. (MOBILE GAS) CU-096-86 Application for conditional use permit to allow the demolition of the existing service station and remove the old gas tanks and to rebuild a modern service station and convenience store. Property located at S.W. corner of N.E. Sunset Blvd. and N.E. 12th Street. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by April 20, 1987. Published: April 6, 1987 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION (ERC) has issued a Preliminary Mitigated declaration of NON-SIGNIFICANCE for the following projects under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applic- � u y pie , being first duly sworn on oath states that ants have completed a mitigation process he/she is the Chief Clerk of the pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. ECF-081-86 BUSH, ROED AND HITCH- CU-095-86 INGS, INC. (MOBILE MDNS GASS) VALLEY NEWSPAPERS Application for conditional use permit to allow the de- Dail y News Journal, DailyRecord Chronicle, DailyGlobe News ice de- molition of the removeing see l vice station and the old gas tanks and to rebuild Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers a modern service station e are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six perty locate d and conveed a att S..W.W.store. er corrnner months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published of N.E. Sunset Blvd. and in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King N.E. 12th Street. ECF-003-87 T&E INVESTMENT, INC. County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal SP-003-87 (CUGINI PIT) newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for MDNS Application for special per- King County. mit for fill and grade permit to allow the filling of a previous- ly excavated gravel pit with The notice in the exact form attached, was ublished in the Dail News 150,00 cubic yards of p y material..Property located at Journal , Daily Record Chronicle ' , Daily Globe News , (and ati N.E. 3rd Further information regardinngg this action not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its is available in the Building and Zoning subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington,235-2550.The City of Renton wotice of Environmental _Determination was published will not act on this proposal for 15 days. on '''r?b r l i B ry 25, 1967 R2106 Comments7 must be received by March 11, Published in the Valley Daily News February 25, 1987. R2106 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 30. 7 . Subscribed and sworn to before me this 6 t h day of i a r 19 5'7 . c• ,z,//"") Notary Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VN#87 Revised 10/84 040 - 096 - • NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Environmental Review Committee Renton,Washington The Environmental Review Committee (ERC)has issued a Preliminary Mitigated Audrey DeJoie first sworn on oath states that declaration of NON-SIGNIFICANCE for being duly the following projects under the authority of he/she is the Chief Clerk of the the Renton Municipal Code. The Applic- ants have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. VALLEY NEWSPAPERS GU.� l-es -096-8-ss MONS: BUSH, ROED AND HITCHINGS, Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News INC.(MOBILE GAS).Application for condi- tional use permit to allow the demolition of the existing service station and remove the Daily newspapers published six(6) times a week.That said newspapers old gas tanks and to rebuild a modern are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six service station and convenience store. monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred to,printed andpublished I Property located at S.W. corner of N.E. Sunset Blvd. and N.E. 12th Street. in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King Further information regarding this action County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal , is available In the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Washington,235-2550.The City of Renton King County. will not act on this proposal for 8 days. , Comments must be received by March 16, 1987. The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Daily News Published in the Valley Daily News March 9, 1987. R2123. Journal—, Daily Record Chronicle , Daily Globe News , (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Notice of Environmental Determination was published on March 9, 1987 R2123 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$ 21.52 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 17 th day of Pia r 19 87 dbliee--Notc for the State of Washington, i residing at Federal Way, !, - King County, Washington. VN*87 Revised 10/84 ,i T. l/V 3510Z NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Preliminary Mitigated declaration of NON-SIGNIFICANCE for the following projects under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicants have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. ECF-081-86 BUSH, ROED AND HITCHINGS, INC. (MOBILE GAS) CU-096-86 Application for conditional use permit to allow the demolition MDNS of the existing service station and remove the old gas tanks and to rebuild a modern service station and convenience store. Property located at S.W. corner of N.E. Sunset Blvd. and N.E. 12th Street. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. The City of Renton will not act on this proposal for 8 days. Comments must be received by March 16, 1987. Published: March 9, 1987 • NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION (ERC) has issued a Preliminary Mitigated declaration of NON-SIGNIFICANCE for the following projects under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applic- AudrPy Dejoie , being first duly sworn on oath states that ants have completed a mitigation process he/she is the Chief Clerk of the pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. ECF-081-86 BUSH, ROED AND HITCH- CU-095-86 INGS, INC. (MOBILE MDNS GASS) VALLEY NEWSPAPERS Application for conditional use permit to allow the de- r- Dail News Journal, DailyRecord Chronicle, DailyGlobe News vice toon of the remove see Y vice station and remove the old gas tanks and to rebuild Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers a modern service station Pro- are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six and convenience store.perty located at S.W.corner months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published of N.E. Sunset Blvd. and in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King N.E. 12th Street. ECF-003-87 T&E INVESTMENT, INC. County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal SP-003-87 (CUGINI PIT) newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for MDNS Application for special per- mit for fill and grade permit to King County. allow the filling of a previous- ly excavated gravel pit with ds The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News material..150,00 cubic yate of Property located at Journal , Daily Record Chronicle n, Daily Globe News _, (and ati N.E.3rd Further information regardinngg this action not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its is available in the Building and Zoning subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington,235-2550.The City of Renton )Notice of Environmental Determination waspublished will not act on this proposal for 15 days. on Fehrtnary 25, 1987 h2106 1987 ents must be received by March 11, Published in the Valley Daily News February 25, 1987.R2106 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 30.75 • Subscribed and sworn to before me this 6th day of 1':ar 19_87 c• No ary Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VN#87 Revised 10/84 1 I . 3510Z NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Preliminary Mitigated declaration of NON-SIGNIFICANCE for the following projects maunder the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicants have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. 1 ECF-081-86 BUSH, ROED AND HITCHINGS, INC. (MOBILE GAS) CU-096-86 Application for conditional use permit to allow the demolition MDNS of the existing service station and remove the old gas tanks and to rebuild a modern service station and convenience store. Property located at S.W. corner of N.E. Sunset Blvd. and N.E. 12th Street. ECF-003-87 T&E INVESTMENT, INC. (CUGINI PIT) SP-003-87 Application for special permit for fill and grade permit to MDNS allow the filling of a previously excavated gravel pit with 150,000 cubic yards of material. Property located at 2880 N.E. 3rd Street. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. The City of Renton will not act on this proposal for 15 days. Comments must be received by March 11, 1987. Published: February 25, 1987 OF R�� .41 s's,,.. ' ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Z o RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR 09 co MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 • O94TED SEP1E•��P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR February 24, 1987 James V. Harrison Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc. 2009 Minor Avenue Seattle, WA 98102 RE: Mobil Oil Conditional Use and Variance Applications, files CU-096-86 and V-006-87 Dear Mr. Harrison: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of your application for a fill and grade permit at the S.W. corner of N.E. Sunset Blvd. and N.E. 12th Street on February 18, 1987. The Committee decided your project requires a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance with the following condition: A secondary containment system for the fuel tanks and lines to the pumps be provided and approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau and the Utility Engineering Division of the Public Works Department. Following this decision, there will be a fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end March 11, 1987. Following the end of the comment period, the City will issue a Final Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation of the determination. Following the issuance of the Final Determination, there will be a 14 day appeal period. Appeals shall be made to the City's Environmental Review Committee. In addition, by the end of the comment period we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner (if needed). If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2540 and ask for myself or Jeanette Samek-McKague. nviron 4/al Ji mmlttee, of Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:JSM:csb:3508Z ye.Lc_ oc..1 OF RA, . ts ` ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 0,9 ''• �� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 ,51;TFD SEID1°#P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR February 24, 1987 Mobil Oil Corporation P.O. Box 3268 Kirkland, WA 98083 • RE: Mobil Oil Conditional Use and Variance Applications, files CU-096-86 and V-006-87 Gentlemen: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of your application for a fill and grade permit at the S.W. corner of N.E. Sunset Blvd. and N.E. 12th Street on February 18, 1987. The Committee decided your project requires a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance with the following condition: A secondary containment system for the fuel tanks and lines to the pumps be provided and approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau and the Utility Engineering Division of the Public Works Department. Following this decision, there will be a fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end March 11, 1987. Following the end of the comment period, the City will issue a Final Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation of the determination. Following the issuance of the Final Determination, there will be a 14 day appeal period. Appeals shall be made • to the City's Environmental Review Committee. In addition, by the end of the comment period we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner (if needed). If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at I235-2540 and ask for myself or Jeanette Samek-McKague. eç5nv77'ntaiCoittee, Dona d K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:JSM:csb:3509Z _c-eA(oki OF R4, " tS•t-''' ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n , RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR ma/ ±` " MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 09 � 0 SEP1c1,0 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR February 23, 1987 James V. Harrison Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc. 2009 Minor Avenue Seattle, WA 98102 RE: Mobil Oil Conditional Use and Variance Applications. files CU-096-86 and V-006-87 Dear Mr. Harrison: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of your application for a fill and grade permit at the S.W. corner of N.E. Sunset Blvd. and N.E. 12th Street on February 18, 1987. The Committee decided your project requires a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance with the following condition: A secondary containment system for the fuel tanks and lines to the pumps be provided and approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau and the Utility Engineering Division of the Public Works Department. Following this decision, there will be a fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end March 11. 1987. Following the end of the comment period. the City will issue a Final Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation of the determination. Once the comment period and reevaluation, if needed, are complete, the City will issue a Final Determination and publish for a 14 day appeal period. During this time, you may appeal the decision of the Environmental Review Committee. In addition, by the end of the comment period we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner (if needed). If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2540 and ask for myself or Jeanette Samek-McKague. r rertha, nvironrbej,tal evieuyr1Committee, ofitacf 411/4, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:JSM:csb:3508Z 11-Ct 0-0 OF IR4 d. ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 09 '� CO� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH.98055 • 235-2540 o " SEPI ."1?) BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR February 23, 1987 Mobil Oil Corporation P.O. Box 3268 Kirkland, WA 98083 • RE: Mobil Oil Conditional Use and Variance Applications, files CU-096-86 and V-006-87 Gentlemen: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of your application for a fill and grade permit at the S.W. corner of N.E. Sunset Blvd. and N.E. 12th Street on February 18, 1987. The Committee decided your project requires a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance with the following condition: A secondary containment system for the fuel tanks and lines to the pumps be provided 'and approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau and the Utility Engineering Division of the Public Works Department. Following this decision, there will be a fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end March 11. 1987. Following the end of the comment period, the City will issue a Final Determination unless I comments received require a reevaluation of the determination. Once the comment period and reevaluation, if needed, are • complete, the City will issue a Final Determination and publish for a 14 day appeal period. During this time, you may appeal the decision of the Environmental Review Committee. In addition, by the end of the comment period we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner (if needed). If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2540 and ask for myself or Jeanette Samek-McKague. For the Environs eptarRev ie w Committee, ip Dorrattr-K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:JSM:csb:3509Z y&-L,LV 3512Z PRELIMINARY MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NON SIGNIFICANCE File: ECF-081-86, CU-096-86 Proponent: Bush, Roed and Hitchings, Inc. (Mobile Gas) Description: Application for conditional use permit to allow the demolition of the existing service station and to remove the old gas tanks and to rebuild a modern service station and convenience store. • Location: Property located at S.W. corner of N.E. Sunset Blvd. and N.E. 12th Street. The above-referenced proposal has completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. The following agreements made with the project applicant or conditions imposed by the Building and Zoning Department are now a part of the proposed action. The conditions or agreements are deemed necessary or beneficial to mitigate environment impacts identified during the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and City of Renton Environmental Ordinance review processes. Conditions or Agreements: A secondary containment system for the fuel tanks and lines to the pumps be provided and approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau and the Utility Engineering division of the Public Works Department. I , The Building and Zoning Department has determined that an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file at the Zoning Division's office. Agencies, affected tribes and other interested parties may submit written comments on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from the above determination hate. Written comments will be accepted until March 11, 1987. Following the end of the comment period, the City will issue a Final Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation of the determination. Following the issuance of the Final Determination. There will be a 14 day appeal period. Appeals shall be made to the City's Environmental Review Committee. Comments should be addressed to: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 J ./ I %/)---42 , i ( � Signature of Responsible Official or Designee PUBLISHED: February 25, 1987 t; Craft) 3485Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT THRESHOLD DETERMINATION STAFF REPORT February 18, 1987 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-081-86 APPLICATION NO. : CU-096-86, V-006-87 APPLICANT: BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS (MOBIL OIL) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applications for approval of: 1) a conditional use permit to allow the demolition of the existing service station and removal of old gas tanks to allow the construction of a modern gasoline dispensing facility and convenience store; and 2) a variance from Section 4-711 (D)(6)(a)(1) of the zoning code to reduce the required landscaping along N.E. Sunset blvd. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: located at the southwest corner of Sunset Boulevard and N.E. 12th Street. SITE AREA: + 0.451 acre ISSUES: Whether the proposed containment system is sufficient to contain potential spills and leaks of fuel on the site? RECOMMENDATION: Recommend mitigated DNS subject to the following condition: A secondary containment system for the fuel tanks and lines to the pumps be provided and approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau and the Utility Engineering Division of the Public Works Department. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING AGENCIES: Various City Department have reviewed and commented upon the project. Some of the more pertinent comments are as follows: Police: Recommended DNS. Parks and Recreation: Recommended DNS. Building Division: Recommended DNS. Fire Prevention Bureau: Recommended DNS. Engineering: Recommended DNS. Following comments made: 1. Site has to many driveways, and they do not meet the current ordinance requirements. 2. Site utility and grading plan required on 22 x 34" original mylar. 3. Provide rim, invert, pipe sizing, etc. for storm drainage system. 4. Three baffled oil/water separator required. BUILDING AND ZONING DI TMENT THRESHOLD DETERMINATIL.. STAFF REPORT February 18, 1987 Page 2 Traffic Engineering: Recommended mitigated DNS. Driveways are unacceptable: 1. Width to be 30' . ,010wtcas 2. Number of driveways to be reduced in. number. 3. Driveways to be 125' minimum from a signalized intersection. All other locations to be a minimum of 50 ft. Zoning Division: No recommendation. More information asked for on plants and transportation. Made following comments: 1. Revised site plan required. Ten foot landscape setbacks not complied with. 2. Are driveways in acceptable locations? 3. New slopes along north property line cannot exceed 2:1. NOTE: 7' high rockery proposed along west property line seems rather high. Policy Development: No recommendation. Noted the following: 1. Double wall containment needed for gas storage tanks. 2. Two separate site plans have been submitted with 2 different floor plans. Which one is the real submittal? • ' - OF R� • •y ® ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT — RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR ' 0 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 9,0 co' 017'ED SEPS1,/ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: JANUARY 28, 1987 TO: ALL PLAN REVIEWERS FROM: BUILDING & ZONING DEPT. S -- SUBJECT: MOBILE OI•L SERVICE STATION/CONVENIENCE STORE • Southwest corner of N.E. Sunset Boyd. & N.E. 12th Street Files: ECF-081-86, CU-096-86, V-006-87 The Building & Zoning Department has received new drawings for the above referenced applications consisting of: 1. Plot Plan 2. Survey Plan 3. Grading Plan 4. Landscaping Plan In addition, we have also received details of the secondary containment for the underground storage tanks. Finally, we have also received a variance application to reduce the required ten feet of landscaping along N.E. Sunset Boulevard per the zoning regulations of the B-1 zone. Please review this new information and comment. Your old routing sheets are being recirculated and a new one is also attached for the variance. CITY' OF R NTON l � lOMf11 F:3 u 41987 J BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. RENTAN BUILDING & ZONING DEPA TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET EC F 081 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE: V-006-87 (REFERENCE: CU-096-86) PROPONENT : BUSH, ROED, & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE : MOBILE OIL SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM SECTION 4-711(D)(6) (a)(1) OF THE ZONING CODE TO REDUCE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING ALONG SUNSET BOULEVARD. ."NOTE: CITY RIGHT- OF-WAY ALONG, SUNSET BOULEVARD WILL BE LANDSCAPED AS PART OF THE REQUIRED OFF-SITE STREET LOCATION : TMPRf1VFMFNTS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SUNSET BOULEVARD & N.E. 12th STREET. TO : III PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 2/11/87 DENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU EPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ® BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT III POLICE DEPARTMENT • POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON FEBRUARY 5, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Pc.,r S VAPPROVED LII APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED CITY OF RENTON TIFICF11V119 riD u 41987 BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. DATE: /i-72 SIGNATURE DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 • O F I? • ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT v t i ® z - o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 90 co. O9�TF0 SEP'�E�O�P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: JANUARY 28, 1987 TO: ALL PLAN REVIEWERS FROM: BUILDING & ZONING DEPT. - SUBJECT: MOBILE OI'L SERVICE STATION/CONVENIENCE STORE • Southwest corner of N.E. Sunset Bovd. & N.E. 12th Street Files: ECF-081-86, CU-096-86, V-006-87 The Building & Zoning Department has received new drawings for the above referenced applications consisting of: 1. Plot Plan 2. Survey Plan 3. Grading Plan 4. Landscaping Plan In addition, we have also received details of the secondary containment for the underground storage tanks. Finally, we have also received a variance application to reduce the required ten feet of landscaping along N.E. Sunset Boulevard per the zoning regulations of the B-1 zone. Please review this new information and comment. Your old routing sheets are being recirculated and a new one it also attached for the variance. _ - REN d BUILDING & ZONING DEF TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 081 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE: V-006-87 (REFERENCE: CU-096-86) PROPONENT : BUSH, ROED, & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE : MOBILE OIL SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM SECTION 4-711(D)(6) (a)(1) OF THE ZONING CODE TO REDUCE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING ALONG SUNSET BOULEVARD. ."NOTE: CITY RIGHT- OF-WAY ALONG SUNSET BOULEVARD WILL BE LANDSCAPED AS PART OF THE REQUIRED OFF-SITE STREET LOCATION : TMPR(IVFMFNTS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SUNSET BOULEVARD & N.E. 12th STREET. TO : ❑ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 2/11/87 ElENGINEERING DIVISION flTRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ❑ UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION ®.. FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n1-1 � 8 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT EC& , El POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT / Z® 1«G OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON FEBRUARY 5, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED NI APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ❑ NOT APPROVED 7is7-xii A./di nJ o f U.VJ Z �1�ov d. %.v/rs aia,( 4 E gy STf��„epAeD /0,27)e7/c es /Os i r. /6 7-6`e r. /a,v, N.c e S ,vo ae Arks". •� Wfr qL1 p P/10/,vim, eo a cT Ei4" E.s r GcJAC< 6 E .0 o.re6r AS /Ar,e 1517 Co DES 4J/ ? i Es i S .e#S cic 7-5 A—a,e A- o .Ee o 77,,if "e-/.cE /AB'5A,49 5 d•z-cic E fr ei d e / o ,c . /•v! O Ah Ae/A7 A'/ Anko SEcO,cJp ARy C 0 ic1 i t / E,es Gc)/2.l A� G' 27/F;EO f�S je .00enisAiABi,Ci e-)puoT A9-4.)p 3- ,f, /a1A,LIeABLic P "ER"1 ' i 3 Re9u/2,Eo_ DATE: - JC; /9.f1 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 _ ' OF I 4" BUILDING® ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT - c RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR NA • MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 9,0 co. Oq'9T - ---- ��-. SEPTE° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH !J i; MAYOR MEMORANDUM 0,4AN, 2 8 19 1 DATE: JANUARY 28, 1987 F F 7- r TO: ALL PLAN REVIEWERS FROM: BUILDING & ZONING DEPT. �f- SUBJECT: MOBILE OI•L SERVICE STATION/CONVENIENCE STORE • Southwest corner of N.E. Sunset Boyd. & N.E. 12th Street Files: ECF-081-86, CU-096-86, V-006-87 The Building & Zoning Department has received new drawings for the above referenced applications consisting of: 1. Plot Plan 2. Survey Plan 3. Grading Plan 4. Landscaping Plan In addition, we have also received details of the secondary containment for the underground storage tanks. • Finally, we have also received a variance application to reduce the required ten feet of landscaping along N.E. Sunset Boulevard per the zoning regulations of the B-1 zone. Please review this new information and comment. Your old routing sheets are being recirculated and a new one is also attached for the variance. Cfrirg \A\\ll E.. 3 MU 07 4 T. 11 ��Ii�G ! LQi�1G Q�� REN` I BUILDING & ZONING DEP ' FMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 081 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE: V-006-87 (REFERENCE: CU-096-86) PROPONENT : BUSH, ROED, & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE : MOBILE OIL SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM SECTION 4-711(D)(6)(a)(1) OF THE ZONING CODE TO REDUCE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING ALONG SUNSET BOULEVARD. .T.NOTE: CITY RIGHT- OF-WAY ALON(, SUNSET BOULEVARD WILL BE LANDSCAPED AS PART OF THE REQUIRED OFF-SITE STREET LOCATION : TMPRf1VFMFNTS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SUNSET BOULEVARD & N.E. 12th STREET. TO : ] PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 2/11/87 El ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ® UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT E POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ri OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M, ON FEBRUARY 5, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : f/ �TG- , APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 1=1 NOT APPROVED r JAN2' 199 Bult.rOG ! ZONING DEPT. • L/GP I DATE : /1__ 27 37 S TUNE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 of R� �y o 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT - o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 9,0 co. 0,9lreo SEPT BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: JANUARY 28, 1987 TO: ALL PLAN REVIEWERS FROM: BUILDING & ZONING DEPT. SUBJECT: MOBILE OI'L SERVICE STATION/CONVENIENCE STORE • Southwest corner of N.E. Sunset Boyd. & N.E. 12th Street Files: ECF-081-86, CU-096-86, V-006-87 The Building & Zoning Department has received new drawings for the above referenced applications consisting of: 1. Plot Plan 2. Survey Plan 3. Grading Plan 4. Landscaping Plan In addition, we have also received details of the secondary containment for the underground storage tanks. • Finally, we have also received a variance application to reduce the required ten feet of landscaping along N.E. Sunset Boulevard per the zoning regulations of the B-1 zone. Please review this new information and comment. Your old routing sheets are being recirculated and a new one is also attached for the variance. cs ry OF RENTON JAN2 . 1987 Blinn; / ZONING DEPT. i y ' REN N BUILDING & ZONING DEF``'TNIENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF !— 081 — 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE: V-006-87 (REFERENCE: CU-096-86) PROPONENT : BUSH, ROED, & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE : MOBILE OIL SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM SECTION 4-711(D)(6) (a)(1) OF THE ZONING CODE TO REDUCE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING ALONG SUNSET BOULEVARD. .".NOTE: CITY RIGHT- OF-WAY ALONG SUNSET BOULEVARD WILL BE LANDSCAPED AS PART OF THE REQUIRED OFF-SITE STREET LOCATION : TMPRfIVFMFMTS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SUNSET BOULEVARD & N.E. 12th STREET. TO: Ei PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 2/11/87 ENGINEERING DIVISION ® TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION JJ FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT • POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT II OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 51: 00 P .M, ON FEBRUARY 5, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : El APPROVED IT APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ❑ NOT APPROVED DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 /� OF R4, • ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT v t; .0 z z Ica o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 ® 235-2540 0,9lteo SEPT �O�P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: JANUARY 28, 1987 TO: ALL PLAN REVIEWERS FROM: BUILDING & ZONING DEPT. - SUBJECT: MOBILE On SERVICE STATION/CONVENIENCE STORE • Southwest corner of N.E. Sunset Bovd. & N.E. 12th Street Files: ECF-081-86, CU-096-86, V-006-87 The Building & Zoning Department has received new drawings for the above referenced applications consisting of: 1. Plot Plan 2. Survey Plan 3. Grading Plan 4. Landscaping Plan In addition, we have also received details of the secondary containment for the underground storage tanks. • Finally, we have also received a variance application to reduce the required ten feet of landscaping along N.E. Sunset Boulevard per the zoning regulations of the B-1 zone. Please review this new information and comment. Your old routing sheets are being recirculated and a new one it also attached for the variance. - REN 1 BUILDING & ZONING DEP !WENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 081 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE: V-006-87 (REFERENCE: CU-096-86) PROPONENT : BUSH, ROED, & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE : MOBILE OIL SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM SECTION 4-711(D)(6) (a) (1) OF THE ZONING CODE TO REDUCE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING ALONG SUNSET BOULEVARD. .hNOTE: CITY RIGHT- OF-WAY ALONG, SUNSET BOULEVARD WILL BE LANDSCAPED AS PART OF THE REQUIRED OFF-SITE STREET LOCATION : TMPR(1VFMFNTc LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SUNSET BOULEVARD & N.E. 12th STREET. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 2/11/87 LI ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ri OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M, ON FEBRUARY 5, 1987 '-13 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : (d)( ; ❑ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED LA-A)OS (Jul ig I A/U C c� ��J ( GU �� � = 02� DATE: - -ed SIGNATURE OF D/�REf�TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 OF R4, $ ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT - o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 9A co. 09q�FD SE PI BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: JANUARY 28, 1987 TO: ALL PLAN REVIEWERS FROM: BUILDING & ZONING DEPT. SUBJECT: MOBILE OIL SERVICE STATION/CONVENIENCE STORE • Southwest corner of N.E. Sunset Bovd. & N.E. 12th Street Files: ECF-081-86, CU-096-86, V-006-87 The Building & Zoning Department has received new drawings for the above referenced applications consisting of: 1. Plot Plan 2. Survey Plan 3. Grading Plan 4. Landscaping Plan In addition, we have also received details of the secondary containment for the underground storage tanks. • Finally, we have also received a variance application to reduce the required ten feet of landscaping along N.E. Sunset Boulevard per the zoning regulations of the B-1 zone. Please review this new information and comment. Your old routing sheets are being recirculated and a new one it also attached for the variance. O1TV OF RENITON� E ECE -R101987 BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. REN I BUILDING & ZONING DEP, :'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF I- 081 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE: V-006-87 (REFERENCE: CU-096-86) PROPONENT : BUSH, RUED, & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE : MOBILE OIL SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM SECTION 4-711(D)(6)(a)(1) OF THE ZONING CODE TO REDUCE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING ALONG SUNSET BOULEVARD. .;'.NOTE: CITY RIGHT- OF-WAY ALONG, SUNSET BOULEVARD WILL BE LANDSCAPED AS PART OF THE REQUIRED OFF-SITE STREET LOCATION : TMPRf1VFMFNTS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SUNSET BOULEVARD & N.E. 12th STREET. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 2/11/87 © ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU IIIPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT C9TY OF: F2E(elTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT FEB 101987 MI POLICE DEPARTMENT ® POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. ® OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WjRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON FEBRUARY 5, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : E / A II APPROVED [J APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED z,_ „ 3 y" V DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 • �� ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT — RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 90 ca• 09grFD SEP� ,f BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: JANUARY 28, 1987 TO: ALL PLAN REVIEWERS FROM: BUILDING & ZONING DEPT. S SUBJECT: MOBILE OI'L SERVICE STATION/CONVENIENCE STORE • Southwest corner of N.E. Sunset Boyd. & N.E. 12th Street Files: ECF-081-86, CU-096-86, V-006-87 The Building & Zoning Department has received new drawings for the above referenced applications consisting of: 1. Plot Plan 2. Survey Plan 3. Grading Plan . 4. Landscaping Plan ' In addition, we have also received details of the secondary containment for the underground storage tanks. Finally, we have also received a variance application to reduce the required ten feet of landscaping along N.E. Sunset Boulevard per the zoning regulations of the B-1 zone. Please review this new information and comment. Your old routing sheets are being recirculated and a new one is also attached for the variance. CITY OF RENTON FEB 101987 Nil ZONING DEPT. • RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 081 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE: V-006-87 (REFERENCE: CU-096-86) PROPONENT: BUSH, ROED, & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE : MOBILE OIL SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM SECTION 4-711(D) (6) (a) (1) OF THE ZONING CODE TO REDUCE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING ALONG SUNSET BOULEVARD. TNOTE: CITY RIGHT- OF-WAY ALONG SUNSET BOULEVARD WILL BE LANDSCAPED AS PART OF THE REQUIRED OFF-SITE STREET LOCATION : TMPRfVFMFNTS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SUNSET BOULEVARD & N.E. 12th STREET. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 2/11/87 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION ETRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU CIT RE TON n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n © 15 [1 V (� n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT F-L3 1019N POLICE DEPARTMENT BUI DIG /ZDNI1'r DFRT. POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT in OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON FEBRUARY 5, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 14AFF1C_ L:- tALIElEibt.165 I ( APPROVED 1210PROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED Vav I zv, c k ac,Rutr`cd -fi/, (iv ®U_9 , ,�� , d�d �� ac-e. © �� r�r l(0 (� s d � t _ -; ��" �Y`LV L+�.=��L,�g �+ ,✓....+-. 'j44,��.v �'J-i2 tas ,..LA, tkij DATE: ;"44g3r SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AfTRIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 tNVIROMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 196b-C6., 7 - DATE CIRCULATED: SEPT. 5th, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: SEPT. 18th, 1986 ECF - 081 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; CU-096-86 PROPONENT: BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE: I BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STATION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS " & TO REBUILD A MODERN SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION: LOCATED AT S.W.. CORNER nF N F._ STTNSF.T RLVTI & N.E. 12th ST II . SITE AREA: 0.451 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic. and Cultural Preservation !I 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: „ 77 tc_ Goa /214-1 /VD 5/5 k.! RECOMMENDATION: DNS [J MITIGATED DNS [ EIS REVIEWED BY: (� TITLE: ��s'T1• DATE: FORM #14 RENTC BUILDING & ZONING DEPA . IAENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 081 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; CU-096-86 PROPONENT : BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE : BRIEFS DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STATION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS AND REBUILD A MODERN SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT S.W. CORNER OF N.E. SUNSET BLVD. & N.E. 12th STREET. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 9-24-86 ® ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT l ( BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OLICE DEPARTMENT ❑ POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON SEPT. 18th. 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ,,APPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED ��-�� DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHI`QIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: VCA-1. I-- e j • L , DATE CIRCULATED: SEPT. 5th, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: - ;� 9�8 6 ECF - 081 - 8 6 APPLICATION NO(s). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-096-86 PROPONENT: BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. S Ef' $ 13F6, PROJECT TITLE: - BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STATION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS & TO REBUILD A MODERN SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION: LOCATED AT S.W. CORNER OF N_F_ STTNSF.T RT.Vf_ & N.E. 12,th ST • SITE AREA: 0.451 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A .. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 1 3) Water , 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities L/ COMMENTS: 10 Do 16 Gt.a.d//o4a4„.../w24491----, eA fr.1— Lyel! ty Across 14-5U r '� RECOMMENDATION: ill, pi DNS MITIGATED DNS n EIS •I; REVIEWED BY: 11 TITLE: (/T/L/Ty /✓k/AJ,E,Fie q DATE: - �S ,._� FORM #14 RENT' BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT ` 1 DEVEL IPME T ,►• PPLIC ATO sN REVUE i. SHEET ECF 081 — 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; CU-096-86 PROPONENT : BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STATION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS AND REB IT, A MODERN SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT S.W. CORNER OF N.E. SUNSET BLVD. & N.E. 12th STREET. TO : El,PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 9-24-86 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION Ei TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION -. El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1-1 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT ' POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT , OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M, ON sEPT. 18th. L986 • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 0774 /T2/ 47A457WE4'4//S/lO APPROVED Ris APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED unto APPROVAL S?dlrf;F T;' LATE COMERS AGREEWZ: AO . LATE COMERS AGREEMENT ,, fj _> ,. . SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-W:411si 7;,2 • 4V kleVey Tesied /9 643 SP. *ST?a SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEWER II. 74FS.7a /S 7/. 4¢ SPECIAL ASSISSIRIE AREA CHARGE-WATER SPECIAL - AREA CHARGE-SEWER 1, sr Z-..-g) MOM .il,PIM nal VD APPROVED ARE HYDRARY LEGe,TlQ S �"4 8T FIRE DEPT. NO FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS NO IP 02„.......2e,KA,„,„,_ wei w foss I(1/ IIIIDATE: 9- Zs -F(D SIGNATURE • `RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVS OM 5/1982 Form 182 _ IIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SkQr A DEPARTMENT: C )��C.. �" LEA ' REVIEWING � DATE CIRCULATED: SEPT. 5th, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: SEPT. 18th, 1986 ECF - 081 - 86 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(s). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, CU-096-86 SFP 5 1986 PROPONENT: BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. pp,iry DEVELOPMENT nFPT. PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL' USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE 'ST,ATION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS & TO REBUILD A MODERN SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION: LOCATED AT S.W. CQRNFR nF N_F._ STTNRPT RT.VTI & N.F. 1 7 th ST. SITE AREA: 0.451 'ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS Q MITIGATED DNS ri EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: . DATE: FORM #14 • •- i , ' , , I I . _ RENTC"',BUILDING & ZONING DEPA TENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 081 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) ; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; CU-096-86 PROPONENT : BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STATION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS AND REBUILD A MODERN SERVICE_ STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT S.W. CORNER OF N.E. SUNSET BLVD. & N.E. 12th STREET. TO : IO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 9-24-86 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU E1PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT flBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT 1QP0LICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P ,M, ON SEPT. 18th. 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; 4L0 L LD EA T-- I ! APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS IR NOT APPROVED 60 :,„,e2,6.Eyua-,i1-/ed izha etete5.42.0o ADATE: 474'/O; SI ATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 Fri/4„, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET j 6C a on rk6Egia ` iiiI LENT: 1 @LE, DATE CIRCULATED: SEPT. 5th, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: SEPT. 18th, 1986 ECF - I : - 6 A4L1CATk'Ns'NO(0. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; CU-096-86 &SFp PrR`OPONQNi 1-986 BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. _— '4 A5* PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STATION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS & TO REBUILD A MODERN SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION: LOCATED AT S.W. CORNFR C P N_F._ STTNSP.T RT. 7fl & N.E. 12.th ST. SITE AREA: 0.45]. ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: I] DNS C) MITIGATED DNS 11 EIS REVIEWED BY: J. 11(4 TITLE: DATE: "I-Q- �l1 FORM /#14 • JP. ; • ( RENT1 BUILDING & ZONING DEPA (WENT 1 , DEVELOPMENT PPLUCATION RE 6EW SHEET ECF - 081 - 86 ,APPLICATION NO(S) : CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; CU-096-86 PROPONENT : BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STATION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS AND a,E TT,D A MODERN RVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT S.W. CORNER OF N.E. SUNSET BLVD. & N.E. 12th STREET. ..J O 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 9-24-86 OENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0/1 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1-1BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT T-1 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT i n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON SEPT. 1,8th. 1986 R!EVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; Ftrt i'reuafr6o1 : 0APPROVED 71APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS [7 NOT APPROVED Q 'au& ptim , iS I f AIL ?-alWA NYC 1 v i 1i• r ;i` 1 r. 1[4./1 Sheet Aims skali be pentad ee Min& Catrasting solar Portable fire extinguishers required 9,1) 1 be ;it ' P1 kN,L 5()(ice Required fire flew ��5 O �P Ca-"1n4. w N1 5v 0 �am�5 Additional hydrants wired MO Fire lanes/Fire %ones shall be marked per Ord. 3312 Fire alarm system required Pa l� Plans to bo seberitted fur approval DATE : °—1 -2 6 SIGNATURE OF DI ECTOR OR FHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 YI it I II it • ii. mot, ' • i.lf .WIRONMEi NTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SMitt.F REVIEWING DEPARTMENTCb LA 1, L--<D) (`' - ) (� c\ . DATE CIRCULATED: SEPT. 5th, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: SEPT. 18th, 1986 ECF - 081 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; CU-096-86 PROPONENT: BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF TEE EXISTING SERVICE ST,ATION & REMOVE: THE OLD GAS TANKS & TO REBUILD A MODERN SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION: th ST SITE AREA: 0. 4 5] 'A _RES BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities _! I COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: [/1DNS ED MITIGATED DNS n EIS • REVIEWED BY: G �/ �' TITLE: DATE: PG, FORM #14 . . 1 1 . . ; _ ,' ,-- -....-.1 • . i . . . ' I ---i) .. i'l $_.,• ... , \t ._.! . . / . ; • ..-_, .. . . , . . . •• ,, ... . ..-- RENTC" BUILDING & ZONING DEPAI RENT ►a w DEVELOPMENT. APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ►ECF - 081 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; CU-096-86 PROPONENT : BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STATION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS AND _ZEBUILD A MODERN SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT S.W. CORNER OF N.E. SUNSET BLVD. & N.E. 12th STREET. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 9-24-86 OENGINEERING DIVISION ® TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION El] FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ri PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT cUILDING & G DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M, ON SEPT. 18th. T986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : (C n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED S J(0,Aj 6LpZ./.77✓�S • �G-r9i� -ti1G GL-J UrJ se AA3 r2 FJ LU/,c)E G� s-Acc.) A ncJ • ,U vv cc i S .5�--�e e L 0 6., -- DATE: 9— 9Y SIGNATURE OF DI�rEC,TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (� REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 .rNIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ��" � DATE CIRCULATED: SEPT. 5th, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: SEPT. 18th, 1986 ECF - 081 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; CU-096-86 PROPONENT: BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STA.TION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS & TO REBUILD A MODERN SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION: th ST SITE AREA: 0.A51 A _RFS BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 6 „ .r Y v Yaof �i1 J l t� r I,:W4 t, BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. RECOMMENDATION: [A DNS fI MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: ,j hsp nvref-/ TITLE: AL-6V 'DATE: #�tTe FORM #14 RENTt - BUILDING & ZONING DEPAI IAENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 081 - 86 APIPLICATION NO(S) : CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; CU-096-86 PROPONENT : BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE ; BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STATION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS AND REBUIr,D A MODERN SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT S.W. CORNER OF N.E. SUNSET BLVD. & N.E. 12th STREET. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 9-24-86 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU aPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT LI BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Ej POLICE DEPARTMENT ® POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON SEPT. 18th. 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; f5:0�` �� RAPPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED ,s-rJ"`1f" o6' C NT 9N CC Il % E °, Q,14) 1 198b 1s BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. DATE: 7/402'6 SIGNA E OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 L - QrSIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: — l 1� • DATE CIRCULATED: SEPT. 5th, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: SEPT. 18th, 1986 ECF - 081 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; CU-096-86 PROPONENT: BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STATION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS & TO REBUILD A MODERN SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION: LOCATED AT S.W. CORNFR OF N_F._ STINRF.T RT,Vf &_ N.E. lath ST SITE AREA: 0.451 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT ' INFORMATION 1) Earth ' 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation34» 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities K COMMENTS: KCOI5e0 51/6 (.+\t - 4.00. '1W LP&DSG¶ Self Is sc , ruo-r Co r\f\rI0LoiL ttc.IZE, '1DZA ouo p 0 (mac - 1c u 10 A) a_op65 A ry Q rV OKt MOP6r( CAry T °Pk)r\-)ci-i Alb6ri° ik)6j16°, I61-i ROCheR PZOPOS6D Y)6 wt 1 Pt i-1 Loot, 56m 1Z r RECOMMENDATION: - DNS Q MITIGATED DNS • 1( EIS REVIEWED BY: 2) � U.r.; TITLE: � Q DATE: — / _ FORM 1114 RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DERAI VIEW I, '`� DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 081 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; CU-096-86 PROPONENT : BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STATION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS AND REBUILD A MODERN SERVICE SvTATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT S.W. CORNER OF N.E. SUNSET BLVD. & N.E. 12th STREET. TO . PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 9-24-86 DENGINEERING DIVISION ❑ TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT i5gauemING & ZONING DEPARTMENT fl POLICE DEPARTMENT fl POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON SEPT. 18th. 1986 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : `-a)tuIn,X - fl APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NINOT APPROVED (l o` ) (.kko5c,p,p6 eff5A.C.K rc u, 1Q3108 P RO PftT-( LA i\,18 A&A - E±1J.CG Uvnoi DATE: 9_. JOB SIGNATURE OF DIREC OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 tNVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P;lVC I YY-- L N27, l v DATE CIRCULATED: SEPT. 5th, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: SEPT. 18th, 1986 ECF - 081 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; CU-096-86 PROPONENT: BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE 'SWION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS & TO REBUILD A MODERN SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION: LOCATED AT S.W. CORNFR OF N_F_ STTNRFT RT.VT] & N.E. 12th ST SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A 0.45]_ ACRES IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water L''' 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources �✓ 7) Environmental Health ✓ 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation ✓ 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services ✓ 16) Utilities COMMENTS: ter z.x 5 S �� - 1 ,1) � b D�//i RECOMMENDATION: PUN DNS ED MITIGATED DNS 1 EIS REVIEWED BY: Gam-- TITLE: 1 DATE: ?7/e/ FORM f#14 RENTc BUILDING & ZONING DEPA IVIENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ELF - 081 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; CU-096-86 PROPONENT BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STATION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS AND REBUILD A MODERN SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT S.W. CORNER OF N.E. SUNSET BLVD. & N.E. 12th STREET. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 9-24-86 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ri UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT O POLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ( OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED :(N WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON ' SEPT. 18th. 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :HAPPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS © NOT APPROVED z e.x 3 V d-,i r q .�-2 +�-•�c i�� 3) , ?//6/F,- . 2°1241)°\ DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 • • •TV , •I • •oY:‘?...4 T,.. Z. .., •ni . •To • I ~. i VIRONIENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 7T? c, DATE CIRCULATED: SEPT. 5th, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: SEPT. 18th, 1986 ECF - 081 - 8 6 APPLICATION NO(s). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; CU-096-86 PROPONENT: BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STATION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS & TO REBUILD A MODERN SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION: th ST SITE AREA: 0.451_ A -RFS BUILDING AREA (gross): NSA IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 4.-"''--- 2) Air 3) Water -- 4) Plants 4,- � 5) Animals �---- 6) Energy and Natural Resources G--'"" 7) Environmental Health e... 8) Land and Shoreline Use (—e'• 9) Housing :f- --- 10) Aesthetics i 11) Light and Glare �``-- 12) Recreation 1.R`"` 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 4'''-- 14) Transportation L.--'"-- 15) Public Services .e.-, 16) Utilities COMMENTS: e---- --Y- !( lire—) 77,--) 1-,-i...„'. ('-1--)-1 C.\ ,.• __.,, n t' ' P ' 1 ' u + v—:-) - ,�c.. •. Fry / f.!� .�'-. d -mil � " ^ 4—� yam( r_�� + I+i' [—_"���, !,/ Q// e' L. —2.2 .1-'-%1> '' D'' • /ma y 1 + 'n a / Jv//17/,/,',,"',-''._ / y02—c, Q. t_.) _) - !It tt.-).;. ,..1l' . to 4- -, ? RECOMMENDATION: fl DNS ET<ITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: g�,i�,,,�-mac t' TITLE: DATE: 1/!6/9lo FORM #14 1 - RENTC-- BUILDING & ZONING DEPAI WENT R / • DEVELOPMENT APPLUCATI1N REVIEW SHEET ECF - 081 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; CU-096-86 PROPONENT : BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STATION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS AND REBUILD A MODERN SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT S.W. CORNER OF N.E. SUNSET' BLVD. & N.E. 12th STREET. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 9-24-86 DENGINEERING DIVISION 1 TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT flOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M, ON ' SEPT. 18th. 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Tv�-�' , E � � ► ete-'t`,y n APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS IJl�i NOT APPROVED `` —t d AN) 4--2-7 /9 ; 6—cl e:::-7 :r> DATE: ,. / s /Irr4 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AU/ ORIZED R PRESENTATIVE r / REVISION 5/11382 Form 182 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: SEPT. 5th, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: SEPT. 18th, 1986 ' ECF - 081 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; CU-096-86 PROPONENT: BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STATION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS & TO REBUILD A MODERN SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION: LOCATED AT S.W. CORNER nF NE_ STTNRFT RT,VT1_ & N.E. lath ST. SITE AREA: 0.451 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: f l DNS EJ MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DATE: FORM #14 A RENTOP ,UILDING & ZONING DEPAR' ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 081 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; CU-096-86 PROPONENT : BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STATION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS AND REBUILD A MODERN SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT S.W. CORNER OF N.E. SUNSET BLVD. & N.E. 12th STREET. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 9-24-86 ENGINEERING DIVISION 1:=ITRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU fl PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED INi WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M, ON SEPT. 18th. 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 11] APPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REMIT BUILDING & ZONING DEPA'►_._.;MENT DEVELOPMENT r . PPLICATIO REVUE SHEET f CF - 081 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; CU-096-86 rROPONENT ; BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. ?'PROJECT TITLE : !.3,RIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW :HE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STATION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS AND _iE$UILD A MODERN SEEVT F STATTON AND CONVENIEriCE STORE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT S.W. CORNER OF N.E. SUNSET BLVD. & N.E. 12th STREET. 11] PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 9-24-86 DENGINEERING DIVISION ® TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 'FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU fl PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT In BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT 'C POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT rlOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED :iN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT :0Y 5 : 00 P ,M, ON SEPT. 18th. 1986 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; F,1t NuatIo1 FlAPPROVED FlAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS [' NOT APPROVED tili•ZgY\ C) -10, lova . 4-#11:2 - tth . Stet a SS fisted as livild'• .. &gIlwk% color (0 iw. Portable lire eztlegelabers required R to fhL fl (Lt ,t j(Intt t .N1, Required i ."�5�� �Pi�, :h,anc n 50' U Cym�S0� Additseaal bgdraata req ed &urn Fire lams/Fire a®ses shall be alarlted per Ord. 3312 llll1 Fire alarm system rewired N� ax1 Plays to W Ir Wag DATE: (A- A I6 SIGNATURE OF DIfECTOR OR ''HORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 RENTO" BUILDING & ZONING DE':T MENT • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET rCF - 081 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; CU-096-86 ' ROPONENT : BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE : 3'RIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW 2HE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STATION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS AND •:EB1JLLD A MODERN SERVICE . TATTON AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT S.W, CORNER OF N.E. SUNSET BLVD. & N.E. 12th STREET. ;0 : 11 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 9-24-86 ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : [1UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION F-1 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT d79,J3UILDING & -ZDISIEBM DEPARTMENT ' POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED tN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT "3Y 5 : 00 P .M, ON SEPT. 18th. 1986 P,EVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : .-ID APPROVED pi APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED FE•-r1-1iz: -titG LL.f e_ u sE` Alcr 11-1 G/'4-DJ r:C� MA)5 (-lc) �C L.J LC J S c�1G � �/ Aj Dj-- f o/GU I / r— �-- �j DATE: 90 SIGNATURE OF DR-EtTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT`" BUILDING & ZONING DE- " l._ MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET :CF - 081 - 86 ,'a'iPPLICATION NO(S) : CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; CU-096-86 'ROPONENT ; BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. °ROJECT TITLE ; BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW 2HE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STATION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS AND .EBUILD A MODERN SERVICESTATION_ AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION ; LOCATED AT S.W, CORNER OF N.E. SUNSET BLVD. & N.E. 12th STREET. r , O , in PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 9-24-86 El ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ❑ UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU CITY ®�E��tON ETPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT E BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING ZONING DEPT. n OTHERS ; COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DY 5 : 00 P .M. ON SEPT. 18th. 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; Pp" I ( _ f APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ❑ NOT APPROVED P;, ;-t1 a / ZOf`''1 I DEPT. • DATE: 7/O/17;6 SIGNArE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 RENTOp° BUILDING & ZONING DE=®"F VENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET iCF - 081 - 86 A1PPLICATION NO(S) : CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; CU-096-86 PROPONENT ; BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. 'IROJECT TITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW HE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STATION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS AND -EBUILD A MODERN SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT S.W. CORNER OF N.E. SUNSET BLVD. & N.E. 12th STREET. Tp : l ( PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 9-24-86 DENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU EPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT fl BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 'OLICE DEPARTMENT I ! POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT �1 n OTHERS ; :OMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED tN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON SEPT. 18th. 1986 "lEV_IEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : (2E ,PPR VED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED DG DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTH - ?TZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 1R7 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REV] MEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 9\-) Li C DATE CIRCULATED: SEPT. 5th, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: SEPT.. 18th. 1986 ECF - 081 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; CU-096-86 PROPONENT: BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STATION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS & TO REBUILD A MODERN SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION: LOCATED AT S .W. CORNER nP NE_ RTTNSPT RT.Vfl & N.E. lath ST SITE AREA: 0. 451 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation • 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities _ COMMENTS: 777e c__ Co A/'k-J -REcEnvED L 717,__OF RENTON BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. RECOMMENDATION: ( DNS a MITIGATED DNS D EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE:GvG,� DATE: / (7 �— FORM #14 `INVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REV SHEET I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: se --(-��f DATE CIRCULATED: SEPT. 5th, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: SEPT. 18th, 1986 ECF - 081 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; CU-096-86 PROPONENT: BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STATION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS & TO REBUILD A MODERN SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION: LOCATED AT S .W. CORNER OF' 1\L F._ SIINSF.T RT3711 & N_E. 12th ST SITE AREA: Q. 451. ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 1 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics i 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation )( 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services - 16) Utilities COMMENTS: EisrrON BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. l,�;e> ,l ,r i /O+��s �i,pE.�'T. RECOMMENDATION: FA DNS D MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: (l//2'' M(7. TITLE: #?L V ' ,`Goz-de".00 v- DATE: g/rd1i. '`:' FORM #14 1 i �' 'ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REV] SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:�:�)(-� 1 (-- , )) f}'-� _77. cu ' " DATE CIRCULATED: SEPT. 5th, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: SEPT. 18th, 1986 ECF - 081 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; CU-Q96-86 PROPONENT: BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STATION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS & TO REBUILD A MODERN SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION: LOCATED AT S.W. CORNER OP N.•F._ gTTNSET RT.VTl & N.E. 12th ST SITE AREA: 0,451 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): N,A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth �' 2) Air �� 3) Water ------- 4) Plants 5) Animals /r 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health `� - 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing /-- 10) Aesthetics - 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation /---J 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services �, 16) Utilities __ COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: 1 DNS El MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: ,i G�j>GA ' , TITLE: DATE: '� / 7 FORM #f14 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEV EET I �q. REVjE,�I tte$R.TNE NT: �. � DATE CIRCULATED: SEPT. 5th, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: SEPT. 18th, 1986 ECF ;d J APl'�i[CAT II'. NO(s). CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS CIJ-096-86 Fpa PROPON2N1': -S83 BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. _6 " '�vQ PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STATION & REMOVE THE OLD GAS TANKS & TO REBUILD A MODERN SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE. LOCATION: LOCATED AT S.W. CORNER OF N_R_ STINSF.T RT.Vn & N.E. 12th ST SITE AREA: 0. 451 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION A 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants I 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare \ 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: 171 DNS LJ MITIGATED DNS El EIS REVIEWED BY: j q(A TITLE: DATE: �% FORM 014 � },. O. - rTY OF RENTC - FILE NO(S): 1/ s -�� BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT LJ- O°W -v' , ♦ Ea + ..11 .. Nry.11 MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those • items related to your,specific type of application(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME - FEES Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc. a REZONE*(FROM TO ) ADDRESS 2009 Minor Avenue East 0 SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP E:=1 TEMPORARY PERMIT* Seattle, 98102 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE SITE PLAN APPROVAL 0 SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL 323-4144 No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON VARIANCE* ,�o�- . From Section: 4-711(D)6(a)1 NAME i * Justification Required k James V. Harrison ADDRESS ' SUBDIVISIONS: • 2009 Minor Avenue East • ED SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT Seattle 98102 ED PRELIMINARY PLAT . TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT 323-4144 17-21 WAIVER (Justification Required) ' OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: • Mobil Oil Corporation . 4 ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: ' P.O. Box 3268 ED PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP a FINAL •' . Kirkland, WA 98083 • P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 828-0707 Q Residential Q Industrial / I Commercial Q Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS Q SW Cor. NE Sunset Blvd. & NE 12th St. TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY El FINAL Gas station • B-1, commercial PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: ' Gas station and convenience store NUMBER OF SPACES: 0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE \)m ' • Sty. F f. ACRES "� I AREA: �'/ :-J . • TOTAL FEES i` 19,643 0.451 I FL1' 2121 STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING , CITY O $M?ON DAT `' APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: \ ),.J�..�l . 111 APPL CATION DETERMINED TO BE: �J � �p� l J , In h 0 1987 Accepted i( '/ i 1 •. • (Initials) CI Incomplete Notification Sent On • By: • I. t l ' .'1 ' Q.U;:.D1ti ,; ,1A30t4c t;Lf;T, DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: , • •• APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: ' QAccepted Incomplete Notification Sent On By: . ' (Initials) ROUTED TO: ' • Q Building Q Design Eng. ' Q F• ire P• arks . - 0 Police 0 Policy Dev. CD T• raffic Eng. U• tilities•L_______1: ' REVISED 1--31-84 • . 1 • Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). Tract h a, which is a portion of Block 11 of corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, as per plat recorded in Volume 57 of plats. pages � I 92 through 98, Records of King Cdunty, except the North 25 feet conveyed li to the City of Renton by instrument recorded under Recording No. 5005388 II for road; and except those portions conveyed to the State of Washington by instrument recorded under Recording No. 7202250193 for road; Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. II . • I , I � AFFIDAVIIT • I, James V. Harrison • ' , being• duly sworn, declare that I am 0 authorized representative to act for the property owner,[]owner of the property involved In this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and,correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED+ AND SWORI` BEFORE ME THIS !1 6- DAY OF 19, NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT • 711 _ I (Name of Notary Public) . (Sig, - - of lNygistr Agent \yadig. ' 0/4 98/6 2 2009 Minor Avenue East (Address) (Address) . • 0o8 .o1`�SSIO N E AQ ,�, :` ` Seattle, :'GSA 9800 i `; o° rO ° ARy N o (City) u! (State) (Zip). ; a • oLn '°U \`' O. �' 9� III °`adoB L °�° ,004 (206) 323-4,144 ; . , ,, • `Pgio - (Telephone) WAS Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete • application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." • 1' • Form #174 • BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. 2009 Minor Avenue East Seattle, Washington 98102 Area 206 / 323-4144 January 15, 1987 • City of Renton Building and Zoning Department CITY Sri: NTON 200 Mill Avenue South i W Renton, WA 98055aC (13 • Attn: Hearings Examiner and/or JA N 2 0 1987 Board of Adjustments • RUILDU G / ll Re: Mobil Oil Corporation Station 10-ACJ IZONII�G EPI. 3002 Sunset Boulevard .1 Renton, Washington • Mr./Ms. Hearings Examiner, Members of the Board: Mobil Oil Corporation is proposing to demolish and rebuild their facility at the above noted location and would like to request your consideration of a variance from Section 4-7111(D)6(a)1, of the City of Renton Building Regulations which states: (6) Landscaping: Landscaping along areas abutting public streets shall have a minimum landscaping strip of ten feet (101, except for the downtown area as defined in Section 4-715(a). a. Lot Line Requirements: 1. Fronting Public Streets: A minimum of ten feet (10' ). While this request is for the eliminating of a required 10' on-site planting strip along Sunset Boulevard, it is Mobil Oil Corporation's intent to provide landscape planting and irrigation full depth from the back of walk to the right-of-way line. This involves some 2,100 square feet of landscaped area, which, at its narrowest point, is 9' wide. • To justify this request, please consider the following conditions and responses: (a) That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Building & Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical classification. The subject 0.45 acre, triangular piece of property is presently occupied by an approximately 20 year old self-serve gas station facility consisting of canopy covered pump islands and an attendant kiosk. It is the desire of Mobil Oil Corporation to bring this site current with modern day technology by installing new fiberglass storage tanks and product piping, providing secondary containment for the unlikely event of a fuel spill, new computerized multi-- product dispensers and transaction equipment and, in general, perform cosmetic improvements. The proposal is to install a limited (1,024 square foot) convenience store facility and new pump islands to be covered by a canopy which parallels Sunset Boulevard. As the site is triangular in shape, with the building placed in the apex of the building envelope (site area less setbacks) this would leave 87' from building face to the right-of-way line of Sunset CIVIL ENGINEERS / LAND SURVEYORS • BUSH, ROED Sc HITCHINGS, Nc. City of Renton January 15, 1987 Page 2 Boulevard. Minus out 5' for sidewalk in front of building and 12' for island depth which leaves 70' or 35' each side of island for maneuvering. As recreational vehicles and truck/trailer combinations are regular users of gas station facilities, it is essential that 35' be provided from the front of the island to the planter curb and from the back of the island to the curb of the building to provide adequate turning radius. The orientation of the islands for this design is optimum in regards to ingress and egress, on-site traffic movements, enhanced visibility for safety against an island fire and protection against drive-off customers without payment. (b) That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated. At present, there exists an approximately 8' wide, non-irrigated planter with sparse shrubs and trees, and two, 35' wide driveway openings. The proposal is for one 40' wide driveway opening and the reconstruction of the adjacent, offsite, 9' to 11' wide landscape strip. By allowing this request, which will enable Mobil Oil Corporation to rebuild this site, the end product will be a 54% increase in landscape area consisting of high-quality landscape planting and irrigation. The granting of the variance will, in no way, be materially detrimental to the public welfare but rather aesthetically enhance the area. (c) That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. The surrounding commercial properties have frontage landscaping as follows: - Winchells Donuts: 10' on NE 12th Street (should have 15' as it is contiguous to residential zoning) and approximately 5' on Sunset Boulevard, - Arco AM/PM: Approximately 4' on Sunset and none on NE 12th Street, - 7/11: None on NE 12th Street, - Jacks Restaurant: None on NE 12th Street and approximately 20' on Sunset, - 31 Flavors, Community Bank, University Bank: Approximately 20' on Sunset Boulevard, - Old National Bank: Approximately 20' on Sunset Boulevard and approximately 10' on Kirkland Avenue, - U.S. Post Office: None on Kirkland Avenue and none on NE 12th Street. All of these measurements are from back of curb or back of sidewalk so it would appear that the only improvements which meet the ordinance are 31 Flavors, Community Bank, University Bank and Old National Bank. Again, at present, the subject property also does not meet the ordinance but the proposed improvements will bring Mobil Oil Corporation closer to conformance. (d) That the approval as determined by the Hearing examiner or Board of Adjustment is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. City of Renton January 15, 1987 Page 3 With the irregular size and shape of the property, combined with the added obstacle of 10' relief across the site, flexibility of layout is minimum on this site. With the building setbacks and parking requirements, it is impossible to set the building any further back from the Sunset Boulevard right-of-way than as proposed. By providing 35' on each side of the pump islands, on-site congestion will be at a minimum, which will, invariably, reduce off-site congestion during peak volume times. To further assist this reduction of off-site congestion, this proposal calls for the elimination of two of the five existing driveways. In conclusion it must be pointed out that the required landscape area for this property (on-site only) would be 4,300 square feet. The proposal calls for 4,320 square feet on-site, plus the 2,100 square feet off-site for a total of 6,420 square feet. We are in hopes that you will agree that this proposal will enhance the area and that the off-site, 10' wide landscape strip meets the intent of Section 4-711(D)6(a) that being to provide adequate separation and transition in a safe and aesthetically pleasing manner. Sincerel , N• l e • V. Harrison !' cd BUSH, R__D & HITCHINGS, INC. 2009 Minor Avenue East Seattle, Washington 98102 Area 206 / 323-4144 January 19, 1987 CITY C9F RNTON J A N 2 01987 ,1 City of Renton BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Attn: Jeanette Samek-McKague Re: Mobil Oil Service Station/Convenience Store • CU-096-86 Revision Landscape Variance Request Dear Ms . Samek-McKague: Attached, please find the necessary documents to process the above noted revisions to Conditional Use Permit Application No. CU-096-86 and the resulting variance request to Section 4-711 (D)6(a) 1 . In response to your letter dated November 17, 1986, please consider the following:- a. Secondary Containment of Storage Tanks Secondary containment will be provided for the entire product storage and delivery system via double wall storage tanks and trench liners. Attached find eight copies of the technical data for "Xerxes" double wall storage tanks and "Fiber Trench, Inc. " trench liners . b. Driveways One driveway has been proposed for each of the three frontage roads`. Attached find eight copies of the revised plot and grade plans indicating same. It is understood that with the revised layout, turning movements would not be restricted at any access point . c. Landscaping A ten foot landscaping strip has been provided along the NE 12th Street frontage and along the Kirkland Avenue NE frontage. The back portion of the site, behind the proposed structure, has been landscaped with a continuous four foot high rockery ' to discourage foot traffic through the landscaped area. Attached find eights copies of the revised landscape plan. CIVIL ENGINEERS/ LAND SURVEYORS Bl _ ROED & HITCHINGS, INc. Ms. Samek-McKague January 19, 1987 Page 2 As was discussed at our previous meetings with yourself and the Environmental Review Committee, site constraints have made the required, onsite, landscape strip along NE Sunset Boulevard unachievable. To address this issue, a landscape variance request is attached and consists of: - Six copies of the plot plan, landscape plan and topographic survey; - Six, 200 ' scale vicinity maps; - Six copies of the required master application and justification. A photograph has also been included, for your convenience, which shows the existing landscaping disposition along NE Sunset Boulevard. We are in hopes that the attached exhibits will render a "Declaration of Non-significance" for the conditional use portion of this project and activate the variance process. If any additional information or clarification of intent is required, please do not hesitate to call . Sincerel , . J.' - • V. rison JV cd Attachments • .. . . , . jilL •:' •wiry' K M , • 7 MoUil . 1/41 i. 4 op? . VI .--. ir •1�sar . 1 km-�/ S`4, I ' it • .: � Mt 'Ng* �� _ Ex 14 T I ki ca 'ITV GO r.1 I G v R -A -r i o r. F A G I ►J C I-4 n 2T I-4 F>zo►-. t I rJ Ta 2 e.• G i n o I.1 0 F K 12 Ic c..,c..►mil r ,t .\/� • LI .6 . A IJ 0 rJ .6 . 1 SGT f Lu p . CITY OF RENTON JAN 2 01987 b \_ LUILDINC, LJNIN6 DEPT, r.r•,, _ : r.o s-s,.SS•WW ki.e. 1 C..+k ST. �M -N— .". , -.••f.•,.•N....e•.7.•y- •gyp 1i..°r"e'".".•.•'.N1fr#.,:...i: i r 61-r6 77..../ \.::. "' ' ,�O2J� •43 Y i•.s 9`/ ▪ Y / ® PY• r. 2�� . ♦ I• . r ram. tl / / y �,. • 4� 1 C ,c' J- •'.c ',,. Sv I p t: '',' qt. ..4 • nfp `•e Y •f s ..`+'1,,1' • Lot l c /I ,4' ��f ` r.•:•iij;J.J+. N t... /+•o/y. • • Z / /,//.' z REN LEA 003-0 . 4 C • i.' 820 4 219 0 0 3 f /••<•s.,,, ,,,- / ^ryti O� ,• v. �`U'/ ° ,' a +. P • ^) -r ;.• `I it �• �•' (\1 °/ /� may: •• I • • for 2 0 t /+l� `� • •+• , •• 2 /O' 1 �f. /,, W G/ _ �`J tO • • - t 4•/"t e•. / .� •�'•Kan I7 /. . . • ,� • ••• 4, •-.,,�1. ., ,,I z ° / ••�• +'Y {(� ;. I p0 • p• 1.7/ ; •.. 4 v It•• ,t Cr ••4.. tlf. e/ ... . .. •,.. , ,.. , .../0 7:'., s 4'1 1, ;"./—":* , " ''''. •`. / • ;4. ',. u -. - .1 _"....'':c.cc_; 7 , -. t t.,, ;,' / > ......., I.:.x• • •1„ iz,s • ,• ins ,• -� "'`t_.. ,�` • '� . 1 ji . • I t-, i,..'A.;:4.1.•,:'.. 16S• ••••Ak2 . .. l• 6......... ,.e ' +ILL 'rf.; ' " ''c' \t..., I . • 6V ' 1 J I T p iii.liEM (Engli 0 CITY OF RENTON SGA L E. : I°-200. JAN 2fl1987 OUILDING/ZONING DEPT. a yelloc, OF RA • ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT - SdL RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 09A �� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 \ ` 9-17-F0 SEPle\* BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR November 17. 1986 Jim Harrison Bush, Rood & Hitchings. Inc. 2009 Minor Avenue East Seattle, WA 98102 Re: Mobile Oil Gasoline/Convenience Store, CU-096-86 Dear Mr. Harrison: As we have discussed on the phone, this letter summarizes items discussed with the Environmental Review Committee when you met with them on the proposed Mobile Oil gasoline/convenience store location on the SW corner of NE Sunset Blvd. and NE 12th St. The following highlights the discussion on the secondary containment of tanks. the driveway locations, landscaping and the need for a turning movement analysis: a. Secondary Containment of Storage Tanks Secondary containment of the storage tanks together with the lines running to the pumps will be required since the station is located within an existing City wellfield. The specific requirements for secondary containment can be obtained from the City's Fire Prevention Bureau staff. b. Driveways The public works department staff in reviewing the project suggested the following: • One driveway centrally located along NE 12th St. • One driveway centrally located along Kirkland Ave. NE. • One driveway centrally located along NE Sunset Blvd. There was some discussion of whether left turns. from Sunset heading north, would be allowed. It was decided that left turn movements may be allowed if it does not interfere with the existing channelization. -2- c. Landscaping The following items were referred to under the discussion of landscaping on the site: • The landscaping strips provided along the three streets are insufficient. Section 4-711(D)6(a)1 requires a minimum 10 foot landscaping strip along areas abutting public streets. The 10 foot landscaping strip is measured from the property line. Therefore. a variance would be required unless portions of the site are redesigned. • Landscaping along the back portion of the proposed building could be terraced (rockery used). This would replace the proposed concrete retaining wall along the property line. Discussion ensued concerning the landscaping options to enhance the view from the residential uses to the west of the subject property. d. Turning Movement Analysis The committee decided that a turning movement analysis was not necessary at this time. If you have any questions, please call me. I apologize for getting this letter out so late and look forward to seeing you again on November 19 at 2:00 p.m. at the Environmental Review Committee Meeting. Sincerely, Jeanette Samek-McKague Acting Zoning Administrator JSM:csb:3278Z • I . / r „ OF R� ' 47"/ eb �y ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT /' iZ sal o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 09 e } �� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 0 235-2540 0,9"'eo SEPr��c5 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH I MAYOR September 29, 1986 Mr. James V. Harrison Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc. ' 2009 Minor Avenue East Seattle, Washington 98102 RE: Mobil Gas Station/CU-096-86 Dear Mr. Harrison: The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) considered your application to allow the construction of a new gasoline/convenience store facility on the southwest corner of the intersection of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and N.E. 12th Street on Wednesday, September 24, 1986. In this specific case where you are completely removing the existing gasoline service station and modifying the primary on-site direction of traffic circulation. the project must comply with all present City codes. The ERC has found that the proposal does not meet present landscaping or curb cut regulations. Perimeter landscaping is not adequate and the curb cuts are too large. In addition there is concern that the modifying the direction of the gasoline pumps will impact traffic access and congestion on the adjacent public streets. A turning movement analysis needs to be completed and submitted. Please consult directly with Mr. Gary Norris, City of Renton Traffic Engineer, on the 1 traffic and access issues (235-2620) and Mr. Jerry Lind, City of Renton Landscape Architect, on the landscaping and zoning issues (235-2550). If you have any procedural questions, please contact Mrs. Jeanette Samek-McKague, Zoning Analyst. She will become the Acting Zoning Administrator effective October 16, 1986. Response should be made to the Committee within approximately three (3) weeks, but no later than Monday. October 20, 1986. For the Environmental Review Committee, ---7.-- 9144t--C.T. Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning ministrator 2076N • ' Y® _ ITY OF RENT_ 4. FILE NO(S): C.1.1ICS'c45't3 i; ® BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT .ri MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc. REZONE*(FROM TO ) ADDRESS 2009 Minor Avenue East • 1::::1 SPECIAL PERMIT* ZI TEMPORARY PERMIT* CITY Seattle y8102 D COd4DITIONAL USE PERMIT* ,51 TELEPHONE LJ SITE PLAN APPROVAL 0 SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL 323-4144 No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON Q VARIANCE* Y . From See ction: * Justification Required NAME James V. Harrison ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: 2009 Minor Avenue East SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT Seattle 98102 PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Ca FINAL PLAT 323-4144 C WAIVER (Justification Required) ©1, / !ER _....i NO. OF LOTS: ,— ^ NAME ��� PLAT NAME: • Mobil Oil Corporation t ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: P.O. Box 3268 Q PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP 0 FINAL Kirkland, WA 98083 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 828-0707 U Residential 0 Industrial 0Commercial n Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS SW Cor. NE Sunset Blvd. & NE 12th St. TENTATIVE ED EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY gas station , B-1, commercial FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: gas station and convenience store NUMBER OF SPACES: r ONMENTAL REVIEW cO ITTEE 90025...) . SQ. FT. ACRES j �4 I AREA: I rIP NVIR�f i/x J`/ TOTAL FEES ,19,643 0.451 + J"� F Nq (QQTAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DAT ' AME © rE 0 W l'ff; \ APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: i I� APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: RuG 2 9 1986 • Accepted t� 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: Ici() O il% / ZONUr G DEP . (Initials) _ DATE O 9....._ED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 5 �' ED Accepted Q Incomplete Notification Sent On By: • (Initials) ROUTED TO• ::1 Building Design Eng. �7 Fire Parks El Police ' dOJVPolicy Dev. /Traffic Eng, Utilities •) DVWTOWn 1 ']] n. • • ' 1 • Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). Tract 11a. which is a portion of Block 11 of corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, as per plat recorded in Volume 57 of plats, pages 92 through 98, Records of King County, except the North 25 feet conveyed to the City of Renton by instrument recorded under Recording No. 5005388 for road; and except those portions conveyed to the State of Washington by instrument recorded under Recording No. 7202250193 for road; Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. I !� AFFIDAVIT I, _,)A►.AGS Sat-) , being • duly sworn, declare that I am El authorized representative to act for the property owner, owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBBSCRJED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS V!U (J` DAY OF 19 .,6: j NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTO , RESIDING AT L ( e of Notary Public) (Sgn ure o -. er) LaG-rEJ j it • (Address) 10� .44\ -1° •C�e (Address) gcc o v\OT'4R ji-9�N a * * �TrLG LA)IJ . C �••�j pUB ® (City) I(State) (Zip) VVAS�\`a®°°� @e7 :) ' 2 - 414- �4- e (Telephone) ‘\ Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 BUSH, R®ED & HITCF S, INC. ILCEU4__3 CIF UlaRISIAIDTUAL Civil Engineers/Land Surveyors 2009 Minor Avenue East SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98102 DATE �_2 JOB • o, (206) 323-4144 ATTENTION r> RE: TO C.'tY pr= n Cam)j© KA Q 1-j( L C�1 1 v -_CAS 2-0D M RA.-- ,d)!6 50 Ste-[' V D , . c ,os5 WE ARE SENDING YOU L KAttached 0 Under separate cover via JILT the following items: ❑ Shop drawings 0 Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications ❑ Copy of letter 0 Change order 0 COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION O �t -IL�TI0' PUDT ��,r�� 1 G-IfLA0G f L7 i>02_0 +`�- o►L- .CZocDF -3 7 4- THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution 0 As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment EC42-- ��� �k T‘���� LDc--C" ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS IAV---, L I +J D , , . Ste'-�L1S� ke-GGEP T O T S i��TvS I S PrL�J�.c_1. 1 c,00(� �CCz�,�►z p To (--) I T Gov TAG,: S22 r��T�2 S , 7'11 AUG 20 1 J b b COPY TO BLUM NG / ZONING -PT. SIGNED: PRODUCT2403 /Areas/Inc,Groton,Ms&01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at nce. < BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INc. OTY R:7N ON Lto a ' ? a -- AU G 2 91986 Ls 7. Justification • A BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. A. Comprehensive Plan The comprehensive plan shows the site as commercial. The' existing zoning is B-1 Commercial which allows a service' station and convenience store. B. Community Need 1. The site has been an existing gas station for over -twenty years. Since the site is already an existing service station the proposal will not increase the total number of service stations in the City. The proposal will provide the neighborhood with a new, modern gas station and convenience store. A feasibility study was conducted by :. Mobil Oil Corporation which shows there is a community need fora •new gas station and convenience store to replace the old service station. 2 . The existing station disburses 125 ,000 gallons of: gasoline . per month, reinforcing the need for an updated, modern service station and convenience store. C. Effect on Adjacent Properties 1. The proposal does conform to the lot coverage requirements of the B-1 commercial zone. 2 . The proposal does conform to the 10 foot setback requirement . of the B-1 commercial zone. 3 . The proposed building height should not exceed 18 .feet. which does conform to the height requirements of the zone. This is the height of the existing gas station and it does not obstruct sunlight, ventilation or view of the adjacent structures . D. Compatibility Since the existing gas station is completely surrounded on all three sides by streets , the gas station does not adversely impact the adjacent property. The surrounding • properties are all Business-1 commercial zoned. E. Parking for proposed gas station and convenience store allows for 8 spaces by the pump islands plus 2 spaces by the customer service area which supplies air and water. There is 547 square feet of retail space in the convenience store. City regulations require one parking space .-for every 200 square feet of retail space, so a total of 3 parking spaces is required. The proposal will allow 4 parking spaces for the convenience store. 1 P I . j, • , .' . 6 I , . . . . . 1 . . I . . . 'p BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. F. Traffic The site is surrounded on three sides by streets and sidewalks. NE Sunset Blvd. to the southeast,. Kirkland Avenue to the southwest and NE 12th Street to the north. NE Sunset Blvd. is a collector street, NE 12th Street is an arterial, and Kirkland Avenue NE is a minor street. the proposal will keep all driveways and sidewalks in their existing state. This will ensure safe movement for both traffic and pedestrians . G. Since the site is currently a gas station , no increase in noise will be created by the proposal. The site will be serviced by low-level lighting to minimize glare. H. Landscaping See attached Landscaping Plan. • I. Accessory Uses None proposed. . J. Conversion No existing building will be converted to a conditional use by this proposal. K. Public Improvements The site is presently serviced by all needed public improvements . 1 . Sewer and water, City of Renton 2. Gas , Washington Natural Gas 3 . Telephone, Pacific NW Bell 4. Power, Puget Sound Power & Light Company 5 . Bus service, Metro bus line on NE 12th Street 6 . Fire protection , City of Renton . . OF R4, �A �j, ECF: l� -� l F(r, 1 • 0 ft% 0 z City of Renton LU: �'`�` `���� Z usIL i 044-ea, SEP�Ev.0- ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Mobil Station NE 12th St. , NE Sunset Blvd. , & Kirkland Avenue NE, Renton, WA 2. Name of applicant: . Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc. (Agent for Mobil Oil Corporation) 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: James V. Harrisonil. Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc 2009 Minor Avenue East Seattle, WA 98102 Phone: 323-4144 4. Date checklist prepared: August 26, 1986 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Proposal is to demolish the existing service station and remove old gas tanks. A new service station and convenience store will be built. _ CITY :, Eu �'J 1 ON fI SJ 6 rji' E -; L RUG 2 91986 Li- -BUILDING/ZONING DEPT, 7. Do you have any plans for future additions. expansions. or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directlyrelated to thisproposal. N/A 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No ' I 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Renton all construction permits (demolition, building, plumbing, sign, etc.). Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency for fuel dispensing facility. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects bf your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. , - Our proposal is to demolish the existing service station and remove the old gas tanks..and to rebuild a modern: service station and convenience store. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Legal description, vicinity map and survey attached. Site is surrounded by NE Sunset Blvd„ NE 12th St. and Kirkland Avenue NE, Renton, WA B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); 4 rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 13% in a small portion of the site, the remainder is level. c. What general types of soils are found on the.site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Most of the existing site is covered with asphalt the soil under- neath the asphalt is a dense gravelly sand. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No, a report by Rittenhouse-Zeman & Assoc. geotechnical consultants, states "based on our subsurface exploration program, the parcel is feasible for development utilizing conventional spread or continuous footings founded above recompacted native soils, or upon 'structural fill' placed above the native soils." - 2 - I I _ e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximately 200 yards of compacted fill.�will be required at the west end of the site. The source of fill is unknown at this time. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction. or use? If so. generally describe. Yes, typical erosion through construction will occur: g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 83% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Standard erosion control measures shall be employed during all phases of construction (i.e. , filter fabric fence) . 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction equipment will cause a temporary increase in emission. After the project is completedvan estimated 15% increase in business is anticipated *hick will generate some additional emissions. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or:river.it flows into. -.. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None - 3 - 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give , general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. No, storm water should run basically the same way it does now. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No - - 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type: of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. '' No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will' be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. There is existing sanitary sewer;. 1 c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Rirnof-f is confined to onsite, storm water only, and will be collected and depositedto the adjacent Closed stormdrainage system. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. 1 -•4 - • ,` d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: A storm conveyance system will be provided to collect surface water runoff for deposit to a closed storm drainage system. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: Is deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other 6-4" deciduous o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other is Shrubs o grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation Ivy b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All existing landscaping will be removed and replaced. See attached landscaping plan. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: See attached landscaping plan. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other N/A Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other N/A Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other N/A b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No - 5 - d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used 'to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. III Type of heating and lighting will be electric. I ' b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No j c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Heat pump, thermal pane, windows, insulation. 7. Environmental Health I a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic II chemicals, risk. of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Yes, possible fuel spill could 'occur. 1) Describe special emergency services;that might be required. Fire, police and aid unit. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any l pumps are equipped with automatic shutt-off features. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project. (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The present site is a service station, so the noise lew'els should remain the same.' ' I'. - 6 - f !/ 2) What types and levals of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. For the short term, while the site is under construction, noise will be created by construction equipment. -.-For the long term, since the existing use is a service station the noise levels for the new station should remain the same. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction will be limited to normal business hours (i.e. , 8:00 am to 6:00 pm) . 8. Land and Shoreline Use • a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently a gas -station and is triangle shaped with all three sides surrounded by a street. The adjacent property_is all Business-1, commerical zoning. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. There is currently a cashiers booth covered by a canopy. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes, except for some planting areas, the entire site will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? B-1 Commercial f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Seven j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 0 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A - 7 - II 1. Proposed measures to ensure the Proposal is compatible with existingand P P projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposal does conform to existing zoning and comprehensive plan requir.emeftt. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed• structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Canopy height is 17'6", steel with concrete panels. - I b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The new station will be an improvement to the neighborhood. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Site will be serviced by low-level lighting and will be operating 24 hr. per day. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Site will use indirect and low level lighting. - 8 - A 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? N/A b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, - describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on. recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is triangular shaped and surrounded by NE 12th= St, NE Sunset Blvd. , and Kirkland Ave. NE, Renton. All access to remain the same. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have?__How many_ __. would the project eliminate? -There presently exists provisions for 10 automobiles at 5_p.ump islands.--- - = -- — -= Proposal calls for the ability to service 8 vehicles at 4 pump islands with _4-- additioaa]- naxk-i g=stalls. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No - 9 I . s • e. Will the projeL..i. use (or occur in the immediate vk11 ty of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally ;describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Possibly.400 vehicle trips per day, usually done in conjunction with other trips, i.e. coming and going to work. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None I I 15. Public Services II a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No 1 b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. C' a util• • entl able attbe,site: electricity, natural gas, Ovate ' refuse service telephone anitary sewer septic sys em, o er. storm sewer b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Note: all utilities are currently being used at the site -Water & Sewer, City of Renton; Electricity, Puget Sound Power & Light: Telephone, Pacific NW Bell; Gas, Washington Natural Gas. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: -J 1 N242_t S a III - 10 - it #176 11-8-84, D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants,.animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: • - 11 - 5. How would the prol___ l be likely to affect land and ,..:::reline use, including • whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: li 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? I I Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I. the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: .11 I I - 12 - I � • • '...•\ v/ sex C IT. t, .Y gasu[Prta - —\\ �5'. .v.L ser r.c.rlx[rL`uO C.17 ».YY •� ''40`• < `�®6 Lr]]-[,ntc...a,"Tg Or BLOca 1]or OO.eecrBo Pur or ) ,yr«_ cc ;`�I Y \ UTILITY,.eax4 �„_c T •I t ese r� �, • ru o[O t.v cows s1 Or ° nL��• \ r VAULT �•`�� �1 �Pure,PARRS i] lg. 9.,actors or KI•G GOUT, o e 5 7(p��ryy�x �p�. f F t} I.ii.mm2r MO n'm]vn.MirCmenc io.saoe M FFOR ROAD;a er .yr c e+� 4:'.�\ _ 'SO STORM ORKIN •7jY' !` ¢p. '" ••`s /�//� p <so F4� v\ s:.`%e:<e`erL !. 4, 7f c :. o.O roa.1 •: •C 1 <•E)oc °O9� 9,9r �. .v ` �`� �y� � Wt•..III l2.C 02.r4 OF• a�`a...NCO..or XI., er4r[Or F `/ 61 )554')• ..,ee/.4�a1 99fi� ` ,'\\Z o MG..'r`"''v '-\ J� •*fGo e— NAM Msx ,• f Q ..--ff YIFO e Ir•Bn t. Pi•.CQ 15 /y �/) \!` )55Y \rc �GGf�fE GJ `, r I1 k$ F .......e FNrIPIGVIOS ..� ` r.,LF .[vc. ° .... {'hag :aa.vr tm[rt ro.onc:rz Ynaro.. n o. h5 v ot; ) r<co.,c �. \6 ,�;rr2 iir",o. '''Ie 55 ;Y) .ryrery\N ,.. O 9u\ `G`.7•.tee r`�! �l ^: i!TR ) O\rrcc. p VICINITY MAP V 8BIM,u 11•201 cm,v. Mn.xre..rr Be.oes v.Oeaaa Luae, + • \i ., r5 �'Sr c Z¢ ; 1 s��r] /� /F �I., �`Y` )'S.' 154 Y o - .�)5�9)9 • roeinuiecLevutwe um TO ro CITY or a..lo.Bnclneu OYroMYrtoe, 0O S t.xx i t . I 4Y P5v f5 c.o...w \Rz 5D e2 rn 11.BO. R.K TO w rtau RUT u[vatxw Z 1' \ ')55 7'S r,`55 ff `^ f'" 6�a)5L .\ \ \ ` .ue TOP or aauz[wt sue wL2 orsii u.:clan `j o Se Pv 4'4!5 C9 , no \ � ,. .�crc YL ram_ �Z o.t.c szuo•o•RD yz zoor*ner corn or el.• IU.° 3 ) D. h9• / yq acoo..m. �� Y'\>'� ¢755 C...Tf mrr OF LIG T .IBis9, ` [. .Oar[Or SOUTTTr.r = �! <.c r " e-occ o.,u,.s ' �< ..c•� 551 AI rr•nca.Yr.o.1` [.act Or MOBIL•Ic Bt5 It O,<cer'9 LY v+ e..<p9 �p 9 o<wre.,.,<o cV<a =�_. NG\.. 'S' J� y .r rn.o.nuar.s]rrs o SOYA...w a,10.AA.SITS Bnr. CI LT, III Sr. I u 44,4p. iuo o.TT! ARP. F Co cCLrc,� �,j�?,� sue_� F 5x .ro..YSto.Ooaa210..a2.[r y U J. ,0 e..v, 4Y°r5 . "o o: . o:o.•L�• .:., ,e:> \\ F .e 5tr a r I.rraOBtota,.,'.rIO.o. m f p '49 • II ,yv u.er. '!� Y•.0 •I lY7Io ec uI a. \ ) \' \�� _ O SCALE 1"610. J4 \ U /' 7° uiv N+0 ,fr. . ' o )�y I • �\ )y/fs S'�_\ Iu y \Y ,o„. u,,� �.' , _`,; .;L; : L . o a I \,Y,\\0. r Gli o,r.<¢`.,` /. . < Mee i •j'I_V• 0 •P. • • •• � d5Y•1,_f f 9Y r: ` `t _ 95 / J Noe_ A 1V mn' 0/ !49 Q ww,Ps '` Q )4Y•I Y C I • !`)4s' `` t '�I • )41• 'S )sr Y \• 1L CI, fit- 4 s r15L \ {✓ 4°y5 • �V .orrous Q • 14Y 't •, YG . 0 I\ . n teat wsPww<r \F \ s5�r�' r v? !^v / • t• v9 '/ e _ • Q •'I•e, 1. $e e' b•II \is \ y1�j`)5 \,,,. Yr'IY ,, .4 I .7 1 4 : t `l' Y w,GN \ e()Z y0� ^,`,9 1P)7u Y��\ (lrrra.c.cJeT . 1=3 1� . • O [� O \ I9' / LV1r541V1fYls1 41r9Y1Y,p•. v ,r .a; • •14Y�/�\f9,' )xp 45 ' i w'!n A Y I Pr« �I'. riwa YV4V. ) / Ue W 1y ' ) 4 I--0y PY, w.cwT < / Ic K + dg •) W caoo wYi/w<T ) 1rt L // \''''\ ]_ 1P p" O 41 Pc< <cco¢ry ` eys OSY INOL W.O \•I �y5 N~ 4 ,O. f )v 1 )/ m o! i°/ rY Y \ 0-0 oe. f p ,.oyc,come,wye :<re,c¢ti _ o�c`` ) n 7'\ 1 )4�voD 15 -. ILA I � — <e .e ••`, . �� -� 'x z:ii j4'I` .• /�ee.. p5 PO 1H 500 a>S 354330W ) 9° �..b� O�-- 7rY xY4Y y_��./ - am! e eL �,�c<'\' ! ) 1 , - m "me',-,.., oe �d %e� e age�9' , • I zm<: (1 —_.rvw« w Ie II'' )� Y 11 "N� v. . )4s'eo..cm,e w '!•Y )vY oe..e I �9 �__= c\cM\o Y" \ 0'o` ylpH • 14 e j 4Y 4Y . •)ore a )v'. • r,uar<•. ' a• .0 )410 f19 —�S'.- ,y4p�. ) cLr 1 • i i l��iIY' )4fv Yi"Y23i4, 0 us— 1'd )4Yrf Y'v' '...,c`r %v %' re.ve `,use <v m0 l ,4r')d J'y• ;04 f° )°7 —L_ 7 cc.yr c<,:_ 1 r a .L < ,,r ` liaLi p ,.. L,..P.,.,..P.,.... , ) ! JT LIC )« e srev Y 14 .w�0 rp )) rY !` !4Y )� caoo wsorcr '4 'O ,` �.c.,r a=10' S-15fi6 4Y l y 86090 o f4Y '` <w�L _"'` NE SUNSET B LV D <wyC s -9e,s,,,,1 1 w'6••�t { "V.%., V,nlnra glnNwt:;','.r J•iawl.aifw�F�w.wa�n R.1��nz w.a 6�nJaly.v r. �wwrnti oil�O l.tw.nl•tt,r<.1 .J•• 0�111�.1 w w I...n u'y R�.r•.�.ww.5.� • 15n,wnA W _ rC M1t a!.mm:.7.`., ..n., •.. ,...., ., .. ��. ...na.. a sHi _ 1 o Z9(<t?'sLI O I iONI .. .....�...�- — �. III�),IA � hI it I• °L 's, 'IF it I!1. Is 1i1' fl_ i! ,fd bp`eJ d• �8 es i !1 10 11 iih .. �.I!I ,1 3, iji li E•N w ap. {I I i Is { Is� I,1,._idsi;i it s j i 1 NOi 11 its¢ 1l)1 i l s 11t is 1s .1 li:c ij- a s1{` :.1'_i 1 { !hi l g I11 i3! i I it l '.i Ia__a iil 111-I .i I!; !- 1.41 liir -rp : f r t, _�. r ,: i 1. l l (� :e 11 Is :{ri,s: i s. .g 1' r �, 5�i_s i-1i I' •.�. � 11 z `s 1j ., .s,.i, s li l ii 1i'� .es{ff tt I 9 ?? i s j is•1.1 ,i 11 11))1 ,i 'i,il-l1_ l�� o 3•.5 /� ! 11 l �1 ::{j{! I eli l• 11{ i ! ill'il,l i .J � e '.•:. i Q Ill j: rliji`!{ iil l i , I li llat y_�`; Ij l?-t I 'il 1' { Issl'ail: li' sll •i:. il'i ° qr t : 1i LJf, ieEE] ' a i llc5l II HA.,ii Hi 1 li , ei: 9{ 1 if lilt !1 ' 1 il!elli��i I€ 11!le {!f ll! hi s ` J 1111 nil t.�;�, \N \ • QI— Z ILI ,�— 1 �v.>r R ,-, i .,..4, . ,. - ,- f .4019°*Igio ..- < • V � p o� [ J 1 0 Oo0 • IS 4 "�ir` le it tip i� \ J 14, 4gi z. Ie.% g•NE oi o lto -� Alp C� 51 • a ' ag • 0oi ;rx C-- �, i4 _ +Q4 . • >, flffl =° � etls'�y lls qq-iii.N--N. �iy I.�V�/� 4.4* :.,,,,,,,,,,,, .. , we t pppp, , 9:#yy J h `N , , .,.‘, i oor _ i41 g k y A i !m5l ` a` a °; go.or ti kta S .'b c �°•°6^u pa&6 s'm c0 L p �p E6 j �' I , I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . I 1 1 1 — iNDING OF FILE FILE TITLE Ne /�� V ,•"? . . •, 1 . . . , . . . - 11 . • , • . I'l li I/ • . 1 1 I : 1 i I J I 1 1 i I 1 I i 1 F 1 I ,...... 1 . .1 I 1 .1 tif..kIFF'• tw.-201,th 44/14)4V: 1 * . ,•,,,,,7,,,,,„ NI, . 5.. ., • .,..„, . „ . .. , it .4 •,, :'• 4, 1, 'e,: :s.i .AS• j 4 . I. .- . •!, V.,• . , ..' . .-.'S4121*:'5 t. '!!, .e. ., • '•. , . , .. -.•.-a• . • ,,,,,,,,,,,,.. ., :..44k't.^.' -',til