The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA-06-014_Report 1l '~j n '; 1·::; .r J.-"'> ·( .,z . =' ,L C"') LE DEVELOPM ENT for ALEX LE ,1 1 ,11 , ~ ~: ~ I I I !] IJ. -,'"-. ' • ' ·' ,, 1--- , 'I ' I i ' ' ' TERRAFO DF,SJGN GRO RAf.A -UP, lNC. - -. -·-'"-· QUEEN J_._ ! I I ' ! I i ' ' '1·;T, .:~ q • 0 -~ 0 ~ . ~ I ~ Ji j ~§ ~ Oo z~ :;; 0 m ~ < ~~s r • m < m ~ i; ;~ , ! " l :\:l' :J ' ,,t--.J--- --• .L ~ . t ' c " . ~ ' ::. . .',. 'I : :;. : i·,•. ( ' ' .~ : ·1''"~-._., '. ·' ,;:-;; :~ !1';: ~; i-: Ii : l1 :-1, ': Ii I :)1 ,• I, C • j ; :.-:----! •1:,,1, I J~/!l~.i:: 'P''' ·1f, ir1:' j~ "!ii i . ,,, ,;, ~ ~ i 1i,i111 • i!l ,,!~<I ~~~~~' C ~J~;~h ~ !"' ~"' C 0 ' • . . ' . I ' ' • ~ ' ! • ' ; ! ' cl"""" 1~~ ~~ :;J;>c ~: 1·'" "'~ .;- ,1rni :~ ! i j !! ' ' ' I , i l_ ___ .l : : I iii q I I \l! : I 0 F I I u • • ~i i • i ' • l ~ ' ~ I i j i e ' I ~ j ' I ' i e ,. ' i ! ' . I ! ! ' --~---·~ O..,Q>clCr~~ °';; ' " • • • .-• • • •; : : : • C: ;i'.~11 !nnns,,,,,,,e,: 1 -, , I i,,~~::!:O!:e:~~~ I ' ? ' jE ' !' •!j ' \ : ' ' : !! ~ i ' I " ' l ' " :i ,. ,, :1 ' ' ,, ' C ' _.j ' ' lj~: _9,1 I i: , ' --1 r· -J I" '~ 1j I I T "I 'I. ' i 'i I, e! ii ii 1, i' ·« ! 14' -j•' ---__ --'---~LJ,nHE ~z "'o '. ;;ic "-I :I: m r ~ 0 I s I I z fm""1 II rF7'""10.af• ~ 1:,-' J a· o· j Ji::-~- " ~ I/ "-1 ~ I~ -----~-"'"' 1~·-3· ' "VI :m ~n ,-.J ~::! 0 z- )> I )> ; ~ i LE DEVELOPMENT f U1 ! QUEEN & NE 4TH A1REET, RENTON, WA 98056 rill.EC HUMBER: -----f'll(ffl;n'Llltf BUILDING ELEVATIONS &SECTION """" U< --------- • ' ' ! I I ' ' ' ~ 'l ~ :;; 0 m ~ < ~§'5 i:;; ~ ~ ~ • n i: ;:: ·i; ~:,·. I; '. I: ~( ' ;, ;I ' i ; i l '' I ' : ,'I :; I : : I 9l~ ono;g1107_-7:.:~ ' I ' " I ' I 'l' ~o f ~~: iii!" [ H~ ' ' ' . --.,----1 . • . tee,,""' -.,,,,.;, ~- i / , V!J I ;. ~('~ ,s H I ~ti~ I I I ii I~ ! I~ I :-~Ji ' II '1, \OJ-! I • I~ • ,c i.:; I I I~ ,, ~ ., !~ ~ ~c ' 1-·« ~-- !! ~ ~ ~ ~ " ' !:1 <. ~ i,, ~ ' . " JI~ .. . ' i "; ~ I i ! ! !i • I i / ,, ---- ;_:-,·:---- /'·- __ ,-._-i~-,,. ------L , _ '~ ' ' I'~ ' it • ~ -< ' .,., ' I~ i ~! 1 1;~;~ ' ! 3 )> F ;ii!· r-':: -: -z ~ ~ ::n m ' l ' :n q ~ 0 ' ~ ,.j :n Ii, ~ •I .. in ~ )> r-r- en ! ' "' ! 1! m •• ~p ~s. J ~ -~-' .. ;g •• I ,, . sa • 0 ea ~ ~ ,! z "' " en ., '• ~i ~i ,, .. ! ! ;, ~ '· ~ 3·-v IH~ ""C ~---r . V'l ~~i ,, -I iil~ ~ )> I ;::tJ 0 IT1 -I )> r- c---, ,. RTS[~: cir,., ! i ; ~ i LE DEVELOPMENT i !'lo) ! QUEEN & NE 4TH AlREET, RENTON, WA 98056 *· ' §r ~~ '·m ;o r IT1 < IT1 r "Tl r 0 0 ;o ""C ~ z £ ~ ~ !! i < ;::tJ )> r- z C) 0 rr, -I )> r- ! e-, . -+----- ' 8 "--------..------11--~.: 9-l-----ff 0 ' --lb.----i--~~~~-e---1!--t~ ,::: 0 (~· -----i.--------.,....--<>-----H I T-- 91 __ 1i'li c/ g~~ 3-~· "~ 0. "'· u:::: • iii " Ft i !· ~- LOWER LEVEL PLAN DETAILS 0 I i 21' •• l ,z " - I ~ lJ 0 I i 0 , I ii: I § :!! • z ~ • iii : I l: : en • 0 ~ l: • m 5 C • C ~ I"" i "!Z~i; . . '~b~ .-m " § ~UHU ~ ~-!! • ! <------------- s T I I/ -,J • JO' l Q ~~Mv '"II ~! I---!C____.j ~ ~ <~ n 0 ' :liDlv ~µi~ ;1 : r'i l~i ' !Ei -f--'U'-i- ~~I. f r ~ ~-~ 1: " • 0 ! ~ i LE DEVELOPMENT j c,.) ! QUEEN & NE 4 TH A TREET, RENTON, WA 98056 /+,;:;:// \ \ I~" e .-. ' ' ' '""": ... .\ : :-: \ ----1--------~~------- I [I I I \ I / I 0 \ I -; ' I 0 ' I / '-.-1_ ....... e 8 [I e @) -----~·~··2-0· ____ _ ---~ !1j 'I ; • ,ej· 1, ' _____ I --- UPPER LEVEL PLAN SCHEDULES WU ARCHITECTURE~Jl(<>lf'g' 111517 II( !16~ Pl.ACE ~IAIU,I(). 1111 NO.l4-611l ....... ~ (125)50J-21!2 F.IJ (4H)m-7!111!1 PROJECT DATA STREET ADDRESS NE 4TH STRffl !i: l)JITN ,l.1£NUE l£ R£1HCW, W.-1. llllO!ill LEGAL DESCRIPTION STR 092305 TIJWT 231 S ISO f1. [f YI 1/2 ti SW 1/4 [f SE 1/-i (f Sf 1/4 1..£SS !65 Fl (f S 130 FT TH(R[OF LESS co ROAD lrSS C;M RGfS [ASOl[l;T PSP&L m~sws~ !.JNE TAX ACCOUNT NUMBERS DV2:l05-923\ SITE & LOT COVERAGE PffO"O:Tf AAEA; llUll.[)WGC()\fJI: LOT a:l.u.A~: ~m SJ. (0.76 ACR£) 8,028 S.F 602~/)~128 E 2HI (OI<) IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREAS "'"" ro,- "'"°" .l0,281lS.F. """"" :t&tO SJ l:l,11.8SJ """"' =• 4,lll2S.F -26,836 SS JJ,1211 SS PARKING CALCULA llONS ,.. ""' l~\£',il.: G!IOOSflilM>IO: '""' -~ s=M> PI.RPONCR£QWIID ~~~ PAAl(INl;R(ill.lllOl a.ou s.r a,ou 1F 16,ll!;IIS.F I STM.1./~S.F 1 ST>U / ID S.F I SJ.Oil / 1500 S.F .· I ~2 !,l : it~ ~i~ f ,:¥~. II ST"'-l.S ,' !ICISl"'H / \1 "''""'""""' lJW»jC ID"fe< ~l~ ~:r;.~~b,) BIAAER-fllf! Sll,U_S 2 S',111.S (3'·o" i 2Q'-~ ==i1i1~S: fi ~}~ i~=f.; ~:4) / ~ ZONINGc& CODES ZONING INFORMATION J.IRJSOICTlON: CHY Cf 11£MTOM lOONG c:.J.Sgf]C,(f!Cfl, CA (aJilW()l(]Al. MllERl41. ZOO ~ NE 4TH CCMIIERCW. OOlRIO('j!) >.DJACEHT PRCft'RTY ZCtliNG: i~11;J__RM-r (RE~TIAL ~n-r,IJ,il_iii (S~1k~f[=~~1 (~ .IJI .l.l) SETB.-1.CK REQJIRElilENTS: FRONT-10'-0" SlD£S. IDIO LOT LJME QEAR (ABUTllNC RW-F") 10'-o" OUILCllHG H£Jl)ll POOIITIED 35'-0' Pl«)'OSIIl 8Ult.DIIIG ~Gil" 29'-6" (c«) CODE INFORMATION BUlDli!G COO£; llflIRNATICtiAL SUUMNC COOf (200:l WTION) WA!tiNCTl)I STA TE ENERGY COOE WA STATE FM£S I R£Q.IL.ITl(WS fCf! SAA!IO-FRE£ DESIGN ClTY ~ REHnw l.Al(l US{ c,:a: OCCUPAACY CLASSflCATION: 9 (BUS11t'.$S) / II (WlRC,1,NTU} / S-2 (TefW.l) CfJ\ISTRUCnc... TYPE: V-B (f\JUY ~) BlJi.C)ljC liOGHT AUO'li(fl: ss·-o· F'ROPO!El ~ 1£lQll· 2\f-a· (et:) ~118£R IJ" srws.: i s~s BASIC Al.l.Of..18..[ Flaa! .I.REA: 9,000 S.F + AUO'ltl8U flOQ< lr,flEA IHCRE(&S PRCKffil FlOCfi AREA. 15,~2C SF LANDSCAPE AREA SUMMARY POIIMETER BED li'iA PAAKiMG LOI N£ 4TH STR[(T FAClm~ 10'-Q" ' n S.F. (660 SF. R(()JIRf!)) 10·-o· PROJECT TEAM OWNER K ! f INl'ESIWENTS ALB lI, GfNER.I.J. 1,1.1,N,1,,GER \0&12 l'JJM':ll ,1.\0U 'iOUlH SLJTI\.L WA 981)3 206-214-5174 FAX "lOE-726-6866 ARCHITECT 1¥J liff(Hl[CM'!E 8817 N.E. 1161\j Pl.AC£ KIRKLOO, IIIASHINGTOH 9'80~-6113 [425) 505-21!2 FA~ (425) 823-7881! STRUCTURAL ENGINEER ENcaNEERS NCR1lflli£ST. 11,'C 6869 WCXXllJ.itj AICNUE !iE SEATl\.£, WA 98115 :?1)6·525-7560 FA). 206-522-6e98 CIVIL ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TERFU FCf!MER OCSIGH GROUP 5212 -~7TH AIOll{ SW SEATTl.f, ~ !l812S 21J6-92J-05QO fA). 206-92~J507 INDEX TO DRAWINGS: I A-1 COVER SHEET; PROJ:CT DATA I TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY I C I.I PA'ANG PLAN C 1.2 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C 1.3 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C I. 4 WATER & SEWER PLAN C 1.5 COMPO~TE UTILITY PLAN C 1.6 CML DETAILS C 1.7 Cl'AL DETAILS C 1.8 Cl~L NOTES L 1.1 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN L 1.2 LANDSCAPE PLANTING DETAILS & NOTES S 0.1 GENERAL NOTES S I.I FOUNDATION PLAN S 1.2 UPPER LEVEL FRAMING PLAN S 1.3 ROOF FRAMING PLAN S 2.1 FOUNDATION SECTIONS S 2.2 SECTIONS S 3.1 ROOF SECTIONS A-2 A-3 A-4 A-5 A-6 LOWER LEVEL PLAM & DETAILS UPPER LEVEL PLAN & SCHEDULES ROOF PLAN & DETAILS BUILDING ELEVATIONS & SECTIOM REFLECTED CEILING PLANS ~rt'.--.,~. r ~~~~, · J·.;·-1.--,,;.b~~.1-~:: •• {::'.::_.I_4 · ;.~-._)~~"·ii,~ '"'-t~·!' '~ ,'?~*·'. ,,1 ·::'~. r' :c .. ;, (;;tr::-~::? :·:i#_';;:j -,..,-,c -· •H:·r~,T "-"'lR RJ~5J<!Ssto, CfNE <<>i...-,,, 'lfC "() 139/!u m-, -•.,._',J_~--1.i--~-. '" f' ·~ t "-f ,. \ ~ <'\ ,. J] I !l Ill lC -I ' / / I ; ' I ',. ,,_-------: /i•/ .JI / .,,,· / ,,,-~ ,,..--.f~ '" ,.---------j ' '/ ,/ ",· r // , .. . I / I ~mtJ,t:,/f=" I ll-1 --''-' , / ~ -hC 7,!!0IOGS31 ~ , ' r---.~,---I , I 1 ' ,. .. I I 1 llr' :'1"'"0:··,c~•e;·;;:···;:G;-t:::C:~=~ ._,_ \ ; . J~rJ;ffrtb...,R I ----~-----~ -\-- 1 / l/l'-;/:;,;;~· 1 i 6h_ VICINITY MAPu~ _j -~--711 I w -'··-·~~':-7•,, .. ?·~·F<"·-~~;:z::=.I .. ,--__ ,_--. . PERMIT NOTES: ~~-~ ;" ~.~: ~ , __ "" ~-... i;;"',c <.. ., ·,---=·-=---= Qino1,11tf,0 1N0 1. No ELEcm1c RESISTANCE HEAT ALLOWED. -•--•---•-\.--: .. -' .,., ~· , .. ,~\~ _ •-. __ : __ .~-!.C t;._'f· · --,;_.,,;>. FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT ~ ~~ ~'i' NE 4T STREET -DEC O ' -3 TENANT IMPROVEMENTS UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. , ---, --~ -----___ ~ 4. PLUMBING, MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL WORK UNDER ~-~ SEPARATE PERMITS. SITE PLAN BUILOINGOlll!SlON 5. R(TAiN WALLS UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT "" ,·. "·'· 6. DtTENTION VAULT UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT ~ •,'. , !• I , C ;: ', t; ,1 1---J iUJ 2f i I~ ii I .... • I " •.~' UJ j; ! . '.: ! : :I: I u a I o: a I < ~i ; I ::i ;~ I 1.S'. ~QI : I s CZ ti~ WQ. a~ 8: (/) ... ~i z~ w .. :I~- Q. ~ o~. ...18 w~ >i'c w: 0 ~11 ~~ ~ 1--·1 :A-1 t; : ~ lfll.V II l~N111X111 1 ~ DA1E •/ll/l(Q! Q.. 0 1 1,001 • ,, Cl / I \. :I -:II ,-=~~ ' ~~1-:_i--_',i' ~t'-oi--~~, _:~l~~r~ ,_ ~:' .• :: u ·xl-·rr-.:_;:i' I-~:~, 7," ~ -i_\_ ~I -J:;~)·" s,JeA"s ! 6 . !~lD'. -:1 '" i " h ' ':..:':.~f ~-I ,\ I·: ' ·'.:, ,\ i ,\•, :1,1.11;'.,,.:~ ,\ ,\ I'' I~ ~ II: ~J_ ~ s_'_'_-' -s, _o-__ ~. ~~~~~2-~·.;J' 1'£\;.!_'°_~~~ ~-1· --' -~ sTA.L'. 'l Tl-~ I-.: "'-:-1c_~s "£~-11 W,,~o 111 9 _,. ,.;;v"" ' ~---~ ' __ .. J2...-"" ~ r--J__, j{ (,0~ "'' .:/" 0 i . .v; ~·~·~iot%1. Hl-"l!l'x" ~ ~-~}' ~ ___ -_--~~*tL·-~ ----l f---_,ro~s1<:~I~ 1-0 t9 -1·----l ~ f-=-_L~A~-,-, ~.,,~:~~ C' ~ --r \4 .{/,;,::.-1='..L --.:/"~~ 40 ~~ 39. ~· 3_".,% 37 36 . % 34 i 33 32 31 30 i I -----/ / I / \ : ! L ·_:..J , ex=.~¥' J , TING ED \ , IPLAN" I j --1 / I / .,1 ~ I < '? .F. ' 1S8S. ,q, /I /? q, :,._') / -~ -' . k-" ' ,,.,,,. ,,_~A,-------s I -. ., • . _../"• • , g CI f . ' . ' .~ ' 0 I (J I 1-, ~ ;':: I :a I I / ~ '.'l ,-,}:,'<> I -----370----,--.L---------II I ·, I ., ~J~~QE;~!~~-iLQf_.__ ~: .EXST. BLDG. -· . -.. Mz~---~, , m ~~; I ! i; _J1 L':.--~' \ ', ~ r "~( !----- 1 w 21 I " ·-::, ,, I~ :t · '0 ·c:i i ~ ;- I~ g IO'. C I< ~~ 1::i !t I~ j.'§ / ,' _ <'.'.""----TOPt·r, 1 UPPERLfY'LFIN.FLR.=312.00-,,, c;;,'· \ --/ [ ----/ . _ .. /. ' ·. /,,.,,.--·. LOWE.R LE'ltl FIN. FL.R.= 362.0C(,,...,2_"_ , l;-i--i I ,·.: ::-1-. ' ---- / I :3,0--_ ~" '--'----~-c : ,', "l' i, I I ' . . ii!~ '~;:..-:--;~~=---~_:-=:~::; ~=:7-, -, ... ,--, --o, -·"~-. ·---,c, 'l,.__..j..,--:-1.H ··. -* -~ --~>o--------J_b-c.._ .. ·-· : ·~ . . . \ . Ii i1•: h r ---- <,,"I l,fJ/~ t "-r: --1 J ".i \ I . \ ' I {;;, ~,. . \ -=-t ' ' ' i ·--:-~~" --. -..:_;:::;+-... , . ~-.1 ---~ ~ ,<~' ..____ ,s " 'RM / / . -s----s . =. --~s~.--~s-.'.""-----.. -<>i'.-s--.----· .--·------:::"'-' 1·---, '"'.> ' / '.:'i:J"-,J' --k -,/ s - ITEM I c1..~c:.1u:.; f'CN!:-R H,1,VSMi:3~;J0.~.-!.]t"'f5 [J,.SEMENT REC. NO. 3391113 ' ~c~ I -_J . --~ ---- s--s---- --0 ~co-ti~·--_J / --~~-STQRtJ/H:IN ---= --~--==--; -=--i----,_,.-..'>" / 1 ---L -s ----~--''--::L ------so ~ ·--sc -$ c-:t \ '-'URN!ANE' \ ll_--9-,~---=-=Q_\ ~--V---It--::J ... il-.----lt-----It-----It ' -w 4--~---=--_"-;~-'-=--= ~ w ~ '-::~ NE-4T STREET-/N("' w .--·-----~---~-~-=s ---~ ~ A . ~O~fNro,. l/_:_ ') SITE PLAN -~ ~ E EIVED \..11 '/ ~=--~~= DECO t -,.J"" ~ GRAOi,JC ':OC:ALE Bl11{~ 0 ,o 50 20 1--:!l Zas l w: ::E ~-o. § 0~ ..J tj" w [:! > « w~ C,;, .. '" ~ii~ ~~~ I A-1a1· ""\f· ,v;,inoo,; 7f l/l1/l00o; CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/ BUILDING/ PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM Date: July 19, 2006 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: LUA (file) Number: Cross-References: AKA's: ' Project Manager: : Acceptance Date: '. Applicant: : Owner: : Contact: PIO Number: , ERC Decision Date: . ERC Appeal Date: Administrative Approval: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: · Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Mylar Recording Number: Le Development Retail/Office Bldg. LUA·06-014, SA-A, ECF Valerie Kinast March 3, 2006 Paul Wu, Wu Architecture K&F Investments Paul Wu, Wu Architecture 0923059231 April 4, 2006 April 24, 2006 April 27, 2006 May 11, 2006 Date: Date: ·. Project Description: The applicant is requesting administrative site plan review and environmental review of a proposal to construct a two-story, 16,384 sf commercial building, 44 parking spaces and associated · : improvements. The ground floor would contain 8,028 sf gross of retail space and the second floor would contain 8,028 sf gross of office use. The building would be located at the front of the lot, along NE 4th St., and the parking would be at the rear. Access would be via a driveway to Queen Ave. NE. Four of the 61 trees on ·' the site would be retained. Five street trees would be planted along the frontage, as part of a 6' landscape · , strip. 19 new trees are proposed along the rear property line in a 10' landscape strip. The applicant is · required to dedicate 25' of public right-of-way along the west lot line and construct street improvements to ueen Ave. NE. , Location: 3700 NE 4th Street · Comments: -:,v,,-, .. , ., .• -,. .. -".,, ,,, ,.-.,~ .. ,, ··-~ ' .... , Paul Wu, AJA, CS! Wu Architecture 8817 NE 116th Place Kirkland, WA 98034 tel: 425-503-2182 eml: paulwu@aol.com (applicant/ contact) Updated: 03/17/06 PARTIES OF RECORD LE DEV RETAIL/OFFICE BLDG LUA06-014, SA-A, ECF K & F Investments 10802 Cornell Avenue S Seattle, WA 98178 tel: 206-214-5174 (owner) Tom Huxtable Windermere Real Estate 3800 NE 4th Street Renton, WA 98056 tel: 425-235-7777 (party of record) (Page 1 of 1) "~y 0 o~,. ~' ·~ + ~ -~ Kathy Keolker, Mayor ~\'\',rO May 12, 2006 Paul Wu, AIA, CSI Wu Architecture 8817 NE 1161h Place Kirkland, WA 98034 SUBJECT: Dear Mr. Wu: Le Development Retail/Office Bldg LUA06-014, SA-A, ECF CITY "lF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator This letter is to inform you that the appeal period has ended for the Administrative Site Plan approval. No appeals were filed. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The advisory notes and conditions of approval listed in the City of Renton Report and Decision dated April 27, 2006 must be adhered to during construction and prior to final inspection. If you have any questions regarding the report and decision issued for this Administrative Site Plan, please call me at (425) 430-7270. Sincerely, Valerie Kinas! Associate Planner cc: K & F Investments/ Owner Tom Huxtable/ Party(ies) of Record ~Fl1'1cl;Aott+tTtnl'>11td<;C5'l-A"'F""F""EA"'L""'S"'S""A-"'A-1'66""-6""'1..,_4 _________________ ~RE N T O N 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 @ This paper contnir1~ 50 °/o recycled material. 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CL'RVE April 28, 2006 Paul Wu, AIA, CSI Wu Architecture 8817 NE 1161h Place Kirkland, WA 98034 SUBJECT: Le Development Retail/Office Bldg LUA06-014, SA-A, ECF Dear Mr. Wu: CITY "lF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator This letter is to inform you that the appeal period ended on April 24, 2006 for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERG) Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated for the above- referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERG determination and this decision is final. Enclosed for your review is the approved Administrative Site Plan Report and Decision, please note that the applicant must comply with all ERG Mitigation Measures and Site Plan Conditions of Approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, //~(/)t~ Valerie Kinas! Associate Planner cc: K & F Investments/ Owner(s) Tom Huxtable/ Party(ies) of Record Enclosure -------l-0-55_S_o_u_th_Gr_ad_y_W-ay---R-e_n_to-n,-W-as-h1-.n-gt-on-9-80_5_5 _______ ~ @ This paper conta1nc. 50°/., recydOO matenal, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE REPORT & DECISION REPORT DA TE: Project Name: Owner: ApplicanUContact: File Number: Project Manager: Project Description: Project Location: Exist. Bldg. Area SF: Site Area: Project Location Map City of Renton Department of Planning I Building I Public Works ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION April 27, 2006 Le Development K & F Investments 10802 Cornell Avenue S Seattle, WA 98178 Paul Wu, AIA, CSI Wu Architecture 8817 NE 116th Place Kirkland, WA 98034 LUA-06-014, SA-A & ECF Valerie Kinast NAME tL ~-.~ The applicant requests administrative site plan approval for a proposal to construct a 16,384 sq. ft., two-story, commercial building, 44 parking spaces and associated improvements on a 0.76-acre site. The zoning designation is Commercial Arterial and the site is in the NE 4'h Street Business District. (Please see additional project description on the next page). 3700 NE 41h Street NA 0. 76-acres (33,128 square feet) Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: Total Building Area SF: 16,384 square feet Same as above Site Report 06-014.doc ST A TE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Jody Barton, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the King County Journal a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington, The King County Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the King County Journal (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the bchnv stated period. The annexed notice, a Public Notice was published April 10, 2006. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $117.60. .5¥~/ ,1\~tllll!/11,, \' •,I/ ,,,,. con/0/ I;// ,,Q .. •···,.O '/ ::· '0 .-'.cc.'· ·n > ,'I ,:. •, ,•,,\, <.1-·. -;. . ~ ~;,,. )ll'!im / Jo,dy,Jl ~- £,:ta[ Advertising Representative, King County Journal Subscribed and sworn to me this 10"' day of April, 2006. : \_' -.._, . ::. -,~:1 ··:*'§ -· -,,-.:. .-:-• ~ ' . ...... _,.. ! -·;~ • .r~~:··· $ '.'/ / /., ,.-, ···•r.·· , .. ,.·., , .. /./,,,·.;-t'. _-.-.,·,·,u,,.::_,.: ~ ..... / "'o ··-· .. ·" ,, B D Cantelon //11 lory p,;o\\,, Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Kent, Washingt&\il// li, 1 I I I 1 \ PO Number: NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Com- mittee has issued a Det€rmination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. Le Development RetaiVOfficc Bldg LUA06-014, SA-A, ECF Location: 3700 NE 4th Street. The applicant is requesting Ad- ministrative Site Plan Approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the oonstruction of a two-story, 16,384 sq. ft. com- mercial building, a 44-stall parking lot, and asc;ociatcd im- provC'mcnts. The site is located in the CommC'rcial Arterial (CAJ zorn', within the NE '1th Rusine:-;s Di:-itrid. Th() site i.s forP.stPd rrnd eont.ain:::; no l'xisting :-itructnrc:-i. Four of the 61 cxi,::ting trccc; are slated for retention. Access is proposed from NE 4th St. via Queen Ave. NE, which would be extended by the applicant as part uf the project. Appeals of the environmental de- termination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on April 24, 2006. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional infor- mation regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Publication Date: Apri] 10, 2006 Published in the King County Journal April 10, 2006. #860203 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE· MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: L• 0.VIJlopment Retail/Office Bldg PROJECT NUMBER: LUA06-014, SA-A, ECF LOCATION: 3700 NE 4°' Strut DESCRIPTION: The applic•nt ia requesting Administrative Site Plan Approval and Environmental ($EPA) Review for the con,tructlon of a two-story, 16,384 aq. ft. commercl:111 building, a 44-stall parfllng lot, ;md aaeoclated Improvements. The ,tte is located In the Commer,;lal Amtrlal ICA) zone, within the NE 4th Bue!nHs District. The site Is lornted arod contains no existing structul'9s. Four or the 81 exletlng trl'H are slated for retention. Ace en Is ptopo...d from NE 4th St. v,a Queen Ave. NE, which would be extended by the applicant as put of thv proJotet. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT Appeals of !he envlronmental delermlnatlon rnus1 h11 fil"d m wrlllng on ot befoT<t 5:00 PM on April 24, 2006. Appeals mu11t be fll"d In writing tog11ther with the required $75.00 application ~II w!th: Hearing Exam!nt1r, City or Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to tho Examiner ue governed by City of Renton Municipal Coda Section 4-&-110.B. Additional lnformalion regarding the appeal procen may b11 oht•ln&d from th& Renton City Clt1n\'11 Offlc,, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED t N FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Plu.se Include project NUMBER when calling for proper file identific::ation. CERTU'ICATION I, bc::re.lL-..:lord.'.:" , hereby certify that ~ copies of the above document were posted by me in _L conspicuous places or nearby the described property on DATE:_t.f /~J....._/_O_(, __ SIGNED:_D_JR_. -k---=~/ ----- ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in , on the I 1 V\day of~~+''-' ~·~·~----- ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Le Development Retail/Office Bldg PROJECT NUMBER: LUAOS-014, SA-A, ECF LOCATION: 3700 NE 4"' Street DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Approval and Environmental ($EPA) Review for the construction of a two.,story, 16,384 sq. ft. commercial building, a 44-stall parking lot, and associated improvements. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone, within the NE 4th Business District. The site Is forested and contains no existing structures. Four of the 61 existing trees are slated for retention. Access is proposed from NE 4th St. via Queen Ave. NE, which would be extended by the applicant as part of the project. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on April 24, 2006. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. t N FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION '\,~y 0 d + + ~ + 0~,. :i1) ~-f2: Kathy Keolker, Mayor ~N'fo April 6, 2006 Paul Wu Wu Architecture 8817 NE 116"' Place Kirkland, WA 98034 SUBJECT: Dear Mr. Wu: Le Development Retail/Office Bldg LUA06-014, SA-A, ECF CITY F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project and have issued a threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the enclosed ERC Report and Decision, Section C for a list of the Mitigation Measures. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on April 24, 2006. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, Valerie Kinas! Associate Planner cc: K & F Investments/ Owner(s) Tom Huxtable/ Party(ies) of Record Enclosure -------,-0-55_S_o_u-th_G_r-ad_y_W-ay---R-e-nt-o-n,-W-a-s-hi-ngt-on_9_80_5_5 _______ ~ @ Thrs paper cu11lairis 50%, recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator April 6, 2006 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERG) on April 4, 2006: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE· MITIGATED PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: Le Development Retail/Office Bldg LUA06-014, SA-A, ECF 3700 NE 4'" Street DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a two-story, 16,384 sq. ft. commercial building, a 44-stall parking lot, and associated improvements. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone, within the NE 4th Business District. The site is forested and contains no existing structures. Four of the 61 existing trees are slated for retention. Access is proposed from NE 4th St. via Queen Ave. NE, which would be extended by the applicant as part of the project. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on April 24, 2006. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, /Jatv--(/U ~ Valerie Kinas! Associate Planner cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division WDFW, Stewart Reinbold David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program US Army Corp. of Engineers Stephanie Kramer, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation _E_n_cl_os_u_re ____ l_05_5_S_o_u_th_G_ra-dy_W_a_y ___ R_e_n_t_on-.-W-a-s-hi_n_gt_o_n_9_8_05_5 _______ -~ AHEAD OF THE CURVI:: CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA06-014, SA-A, ECF Paul Wu, Wu Architecture APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: Le Development Retail/Office Building DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a two-story, 16,384 sq. ft. commercial building, a 44-stall parking lot, and associated improvements. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone, within the NE 4th Business District. The site is forested and contains no existing structures. Four of the 61 existing trees are slated for retention. Access is proposed from NE 4th St. via Queen Ave. NE, which would be extended by the applicant as part of the project. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: 3700 NE 4th Street The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on April 24, 2006. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: Terry Higashiyama, Administrator Community Services April 10, 2006 April 4, 2006 Date Larry Rude, Interim Fire Chief Fire Department DAfe CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA06-014, SA-A, ECF APPLICANT: Paul Wu, Wu Architecture PROJECT NAME: Le Development Retail/Office Building DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a two-story, 16,384 sq. ft. commercial building, a 44-stall parking lot, and associated improvements. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone, within the NE 4th Business District. The site is forested and contains no existing structures. Four of the 61 existing trees are slated for retention. Access is proposed from NE 4th St. via Queen Ave. NE, which would be extended by the applicant as part of the project. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: 3700 NE 4th Street The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section 1. The site work and construction of the proposed building shall comply with the recommendations contained within the "Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Geotechnical Engineering Report" prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. dated December 14, 2005, regarding site preparation, structural fill and erosion hazards and mitigation. 2. The applicant shall provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the State Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual and provide staff with a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of construction permits for the site improvements. 3. The project will be required to comply with the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual for surface water management. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per new average daily trip attributed to the project prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of the gross floor area of the new building. ERC Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUA06-014, SA-A, ECF Paul Wu, Wu Architecture Le Development Retail/Office Building DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a two-story, 16,384 sq, ft. commercial building, a 44-stall parking lot, and associated improvements, The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone, within the NE 4th Business District. The site is forested and contains no existing structures, Four of the 61 existing trees are slated for retention. Access is proposed from NE 4th St. via Queen Ave. NE, which would be extended by the applicant as part of the project. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: 3700 NE 4th Street The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 2. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 3. Commercial, multi-family, new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) am and eight o'clock (8:00) pm, Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) am and eight o'clock (8:00) pm. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 4. All landscaping shall be irrigated by an approved irrigation system prior to final occupancy permits. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow is 2,750 gpm. One hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and two additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of fire alarm and sprinkler systems. The wet retention vault must be designed and certified by a structural engineer to withstand the load of the fire apparatus. 3. Provide a list of flammable, combustible liquids pr hazardous chemicals that may be used or stored on site. Plan Review -WATER 1. A pressure reduce valve will be required. 2. Water System Development Charge in the amount of S0.273 per sq. ft. of property applies. This fee is payable with the utility construction permit. ERG Advisory Notes Page 1 of 2 3. Preliminary fire flow is 2,750 gpm. City Code requires the installation of a looped water main around the buildings or complex of buildings when the fire flow demand exceeds 2,500 gpm. 4. Minimum of three fire hydrants are required. Existing hydrants will be required to be retrofitted with Storz "quick disconnect" fittings. 5. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly for fire sprinkler systems. Devices installed shall be per the latest Department of Health "Approved List" of Backflow Prevention Devices. Civil plans shall note: "Separate plans and utility permit for DDCVA installation for Fire Sprinkler System will be required". If backflow device is to be installed inside the building, applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing location and installation of the device as part of the utility plan submittal. 6. Buildings that exceed 30 feet in height will require a backflow device to be installed on domestic water meters. Plan Review -SANITARY SEWER 1. If commercial food preparation facilities are proposed, then a grease trap or grease interceptor will be required. A separate plumbing permit will also be required. 2. Side sewer shall be a minimum 6-inch at 2% slope. 3. Sewer System Development Charge in the amount of $0.142 per square foot of the property apply. This fee is payable with the construction permit. 4. East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District (SAD) fees will be required. Fees are $0.069 per square-foot of the property plus interest. Plan Review -SURFACE WATER 1. Surface Water System Development Charge in the amount of $0.265 per square foot of new impervious area applies. This fee is payable with the utility construction permit. 2. Applicant will be required to submit separate structural plans for review and approval under a building permit for proposed detention vault. Special inspection from the building department is required. Plan Review -AQUIFER 1. The site is located in Aquifer Protection Zone 2 and may be subject to additional requirements per City code. Plan Review -TRANSPORTATION 1. Off-site improvements including sidewalk, curb and gutter, street paving, stormwater conveyance system, landscaping and street lighting will be required along the frontage of the development with Queen Ave NE. 2. This project will be required to dedicate 25 feet of right-of-way to the City along the frontage of the parcel with Queen Ave NE. 3. This project is also required to dedicate a minimum of 25-foot radius along the corner of NE 4th Street and Queen Ave NE. Plan Review -GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 3. Separate permits for water meters and backflow device are required. When plans are complete two copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate and application fee shall be submitted at the sixth floor counter. ERC Advisory Notes Page 2 of 2 .... March 20, 2006 Paul Z. Wu Wu Architecture 8817 NE 116th Place Kirkland, WA 98034 CITY . •F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator CONCURl;lEN~E . DATE '.:i · IL, 'u Subject: Parking Modification Request for The Le Development Renton File No. LUA06-014, SA-A, ECF) Dear Mr. Wu: The City of Renton 1s in receipt of your request for a parking modification dated February 1, 2006 regarding the property located at 3700 NE 4th Street. The following summarizes your request, project background, analysis and decision. summary of Request The applicant, Paul Wu of Wu Architecture, has requested a modification on behalf of K & F Investments from RMC 4-4-080F8 Parking Stall Types, Sizes, and Percentage Allowed/Required of the City's Parking Regulations. This section requires a standard parking stall size of 9 feet by 20 feet for surface parking in the CA zone. It allows up to 30% of the stalls to be compact spaces with a minimum size of 8 V2 feet by 16 feet. A modification has been requested to reduce the required standard stall length from 20 feet to 18 feet, and to increase the maximum number of compact stalls from 30% to 40%. Also, the applicant has not applied for, but is in need of, a reduction in the total number of parking stalls because only 44 parking stalls are proposed. The applicant based his parking calculations on a ratio of 60% storage area in the office space of the project. The ratio might be correct for some forms of office usage, but because the future tenants are not yet known, a more general ratio should be assumed. At a ratio of 20% storage to 80% office use, the total number of parking stalls required of the project is 50. So the project is also in need of a reduction in the number of required parking stalls from 50 to 44. Section 4-4-080Fd allows the Development Services Division to grant modifications from the parking standards for individual cases provided that the modification meets the following criteria (pursuant to RMC 4-9-250D2): a. Substantially implements the policy direction of the policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and the Community Design Element and the proposed modification is the minimum adjustment necessary to implement these policies and objectives; b. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; -------,-O-SS_S_o_u_th_G_r-ad_y_W-ay---R-e-nt_o_n,-\-lva-s-hi-ngt-on-9-80_5_5 ______ ~ @ This paper cor1lair1s !.>C'':'c recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE '. ... "~y 0 o~,~ tt; CITY IF RENTON + ~ + Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department ;1:JR O~l)"--K_•_th_y_K_•o-lk_e_,._M_•_yo_, ______________ G_r_e_gg_z_im_m_er_m_a_n_P_._E_.,_A_d_llll_·_nis_t_r_at_o_r __ ~·Nrt March 20, 2006 Paul Z. Wu Wu Architecture 8817 NE 116'h Place Kirkland, WA 98034 Subject: Parking Modification Request for The Le Development Renton File No. LUA06-014, SA-A, ECF) Dear Mr. Wu: The City of Renton 1s in receipt of your request for a parking modification dated February 1, 2006 regarding the property located at 3700 NE 4th Street. The following summarizes your request, project background, analysis and decision. Summary of Request The applicant, Paul Wu of Wu Architecture, has requested a modification on behalf of K & F Investments from RMC 4-4-080F8 Parking Stall Types, Sizes, and Percentagi, Allowed/Required of the City's Parking Regulations. This section requires a standard parking stall size of 9 feet by 20 feet for surface parking in the CA zone. It allows up to 30% of the stalls to be compact spaces with a minimum size of 8 V2 feet by 16 feet. A modification has been requested to reduce the required standard stall length from 20 feet to 18 feet, and to increase the maximum number of compact stalls from 30% to 40%. Also, the applicant has not applied for, but is in need of, a reduction in the total number of parking stalls because only 44 parking stalls are proposed. The applicant based his parking calculations on a ratio of 60% storage area in the office space of the project. The ratio might be correct for some forms of office usage, but because the future tenants are not yet known, a more general ratio should be assumed. At a ratio of 20% storage to 80% office use, the total number of parking stalls required of the project is 50. So the project is also in need of a reduction in the number of required parking stalls from 50 to 44. Section 4-4-080Fd allows the Development Services Division to grant modifications from the parking standards for individual cases provided that the modification meets the following criteria (pursuant to RMC 4-9-250D2): a. Substantially implements the policy direction of the policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and the Community Design Element and the proposed modification is the minimum adjustment necessary to implement these policies and objectives; b. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; -------10_5_5-So_u_th_G_ra-dy-W-ay--R-e-n-to-n-,W --a,--h-in_gt_o_n_9_8-05_5 _______ ~ AHEAD OF THE CURVE Le Development Parking Modification Page 2 of 3 c. Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; d. Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; e. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and f. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(s) in the vicinity. Background The Le Development proposal is to construct a two-story 16,384 square foot commercial building on the north side of NE 4th Street in the NE 4th Street Business District. Parking is proposed at the rear of the site along the north property line. 8,028 square feet of retail is proposed on the ground floor of the building and 8,028 square feet of office use is proposed on the upper floor. The lot has a "panhandle" that stretches east about 165 feet from the northeastern corner of the main portion of the lof The panhandleis.50 feet wide and covered in part by a power line easement, limiting its use for the development. The applicant has placed required landscaping, refuse deposit areas and 17 compact parking stalls in this part of the site. In accordance with RMC 4•4-080F, the,.rninimum number of parking stalls required for the building is based on the amounfof retail, office and storage use of the proposed space. The required ratioJqffetail .is four per 1,ClOO square feet of net floor area. Office use requires three stalls per 1,000 square teetof net floor area and indoor storage requires one st.all per 1,500 square feet of net floor area. The number of parking stalls required for the Le·Developmentproject is 31 stalls for 7,768 square feet of retail, 18 stalls for 6,109 square .feet of office a.nd 1 stall for 1,521 square feet of storage area, for a total of50 parking stalls. The parking regulations allow up to 30% of these stalls to be comp11ct, in this case 15 cornpact stalls. Analysis 1. Substantially implements the policy direction of the policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan Laod Use Element and the Community Design Element and the proposed modification is the minimum adjustment necessary to implement these policies and objectives. A. Number of Stalls. The Le Development project clearly implements the type of development envisioned for the Commercial Corridor land use designation. It locates the parking at the rear of the site, has a landscaped buffer to the north, contains retail to support the office usage, and follows a unified development concept. The minimum necessary to supply sufficient parking for this project, and yet recognize the constraints of the site and the uncertainty of building commercial space for unknown tenants, would be to grant a reduction in the total number of required parking stalls from 50 to 44, as proposed, and to increase the ratio of compact stalls to 40% in order .to allow full usage of the panhandle area of the lot. .. .. . ... Le Development Parking Modification Page 3 of 3 B. Stall length. Reducing the standard parking stall length from 20 feet to 18 feet would go beyond the minimum necessary to accommodate the project. The site and configuration of the development could allow for the required stall depth and still achieve a development of ample size. 2. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment. A. Number of Stalls. Allowing for six fewer parking spaces and an increased number of compact stalls will not compromise the safety, function or appearance of the parking lot. The proposed 44 stalls will offer sufficient parking for the project. Aisle widths meet code requirements and landscaping is provided to buffer neighboring residential development from the parking lot. B. Stall length. Reducing the standard stall length, on the other hand, would compromise the drive aisle area and/or the landscape buffer. Because the stalls near the building are fronted by a retaining wall, there is no space for overhang, which pushes the cars into the drive aisle. Also, the landscape strip along the north lot line has already been reduced from 15 feet to 10 feet and could be further compromised by cars overhanging substandard stalls. It would furthermore not meet the intent of RMC 4-4-080F8e, which allows a reduction of stall length only when there is sufficient area so that vehicles do not overhang required landscaping areas. 3. Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity. A. Number of Stalls. Allowing for six fewer parking spaces and an increased number of compact stalls will not likely be injurious to the property in the vicinity. There will be 44 parking stalls to accommodate the project, which is also serviced by bus, with a bus stop located right in front of the site. The portion of the lot where the compact stalls would be located offers sufficient space for maneuvering. A ten-foot landscape buffer would serve to reduce the impact of the parking lot from the residential development to the north. B. Stall length. Allowing a reduction of the minimum stall length could be injurious to property in the vicinity if it fed to cars overhanging into the landscape buffer, causing damage and compromising the visual buffering function of the landscape strip. RMC 4-4-080F8e addresses this concern by only allowing a reduction of stall length when there is sufficient area so that vehicles do not overhang required landscaping areas. 4. Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code. A. Number of Stalls. The requested changes to the total number of spaces and the percentage of compact stalls conform to the intent and purpose of the code. New developments are intended to include sufficient parking spaces to meet the needs of employees and clients. When developing for projects that do not have tenants yet, assumptions must be relied upon to ascertain what is necessary to meet this intent. For the Le Development, with one floor of retail and one of office space, it can be assumed that 44 parking spaces will adequately meet the parking needs of the project, and thus the intent of the code. The development is located in the NE 4th Business District, where the code requires that parking be held to the minimum ratios required in the Le. Development Parking Modification Page 4 of 3 parking standards. The intent of this is to limit the amount of parking In areas that are well-served by transit. The Le Development has a bus stop directly in front of it on NE 4th Street. B. Stall length. It is doubtful if the project could meet the intent of the development regulations if the stall length is reduced. The regulations that affect site design intend to aid the app.licant in carefully incorporating the project into its surroundings. The submitted design, showing the reduced sized stalls, would either cause parked cars to infringe on the landscaping strip or the center drive aisle, and would expand the use beyond what it appears the lot can support under current zoning. 5. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended . . A, Number of Stalls. Reducing the number of spaces and allowing a higher percentage of compact stalls can .be justified due to the use proposed, the location and the site condjtlOfts .. The commercial development augments existing development In the NE 4th Street Business District with efficient urban . site configuration served by transit. The site' sh;;ipe, and specifically the "panhandle" that stretches northeast from the site, necessitate a greater number of compact stalls than permitted if the landscape buffer and drive aisle widths are to meet code andt.hat portion of the lot is to be used efficiently; · '/ · · B. Stall length. ReducingtheJi~ndard,stall size for the majority of the parking stalls is not required ln'~fderto use the sitecefficiently as a commercial development. ItJ:nay necessitate th'e building to be reduced slightly, but the structure woultLstill be of a size that it could meet the intended use as retail and office space. 6. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(s) in the vicinity. A. Number of Stalls. The propqsed modificatiQ/1 to the number of stalls and percentage of compact st<1Us would not likely .cause adverse impacts to neighboring properties. Cars woulc;I. enter the project's parking lot from NE 4·tn Street via Queen Avenue, which would be extended by the applicant as part of the project. Circulation would be solely within the project and not through or over any of the neighboring lots, Regulations for the NE 4th Business District require projects to orientate themselves on the minimum number of parking stalls required by code, because they recognize the availability of transit in that corridor and maintain that businesses along NE 4th Street need fewer parking stalls than are generally required in commercial developments elsewhere in the city. Reducing the number of stalls and allowing more compact stalls would furthermore, not have an effect on the visual buffering provided between the site and the residential use to the north. B. Stall length. Reducing the standard stall length from 20 feet to 18 feet could lead to a compromise of the visual landscape buffer. It would thus minimize the mitigation of impacts to neighboring uses. Decision 1. Number of Stalls; The applicant's request for a modification from the minimum number of required parking stalls, from 50 to 44, is granted. The . ' • Le Development Parking Modification Page 5 of 3 request for a modification from the limit to the number of compact parking stalls, from 30% to 40%, is granted, 2. Reduction of stall length. The request for a reduction in the minimum parking stall length is denied, This decision to approve the proposed revisions as a minor modification is subject to a fourteen (14) day appeal period from the date of this letter. Any appeals of the administrative decision must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5: 00 pm, April 3, 2006. If you have questions regarding this correspondence, feel free to contact Valerie Kinast at (425) 430-7270. Sincerely, Neil.Watts Development Services Director Cc Valerie Kinast, Project Manager Yellow file PROP V SERVICES FEE REVIEW #2006 ---' {tsi; DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Jll ENVIRONMENT AL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET , D PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP D APPLICANT: 1)0M._L w i~ JOB ADDRESS: 'Jj()o i '? lli >t, RECEIVED FR l ~ OTHER ~ ~r I,_ c WO# }::t0'-I (ate) NATUREOFWORK: CQ,1ffi11CJ-d·Sfn&1 f2iclqi. GREEN# _____ _ D SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES APPLIED cef-. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTIMATED NEED MORE INFORMATION, D SQUARE FOOTAGE D FRONT FOOTAGE D LEGAL DESCRIPTION D NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES D VESTED D NOT VESTED D This fee review supersedes~ cancels fee review #~--.. _ ~ dated SUBJECTPROPERTYPJD# £iZ3yP5-C1ZZ I D VICINITY MAP D OTHER D PARENT PJD# (subject to change)_ D King Co. Tax Acct# (new) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. TI1e following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits, r/w pennit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. UNITS OR FEE WATER S ial Assessment District/WATER $75.00 PER TRIP, CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION #OF UNITS/ SQ. FTG. SDCFEE Never Pd DoesNOTA All other properties $0.265/sq ft of new impervious area of property x (not less than $759.00) PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ ,~~4.l'A,bl4AY>-~~~3/zl/).ld& rtA~\ * If subject property is within an LID, it is developer's responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. ** If an additional water meter (or hydrant) is being installed for fire protection qr an additional water meter is being installed for private landscape irrigation, please advise as above fees may change. EFFECTIVE: Jannary 8, 2006 g 1 "' 0 • 0 " "' " • N:i < e· • • " 0 ' East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District KC Tax Account Number Owner's Name KC Recording Number Parcel Number Special Assess. Dist. No. Ordinance Number Publication Date Effective Date of Ordinance Date of Calculation Original Assessment Interest Rate Peak (% of Base) Base Plus Interest Max. Peaked Assessment 9606210966 092305-9231 0002 4612 06/14/1996 * If The amount of base plus interest is greater than the maximum peaked assessment, then assess the maximum peaked assessment. lhdditional Interest per day 07/14/1996 03/19/2006 $2,285.83 4.11% 141% $3,195.19 $3,225.31 $0.2573911 03/20/2006 City of Reu.-n Department of Planning I Building I Public \,'\,,. .. s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 16, 2006 DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 2, 2006 APPLICANT: Paul Wu PROJECT MANAGER: Valerie Kinast AR ii 3 2001, PROJECT TITLE: Le Develo ment Retail/Office Bid PLAN REVIEW: Juliana Fries SITE AREA: 33,128 s uare feet BUILDING AREA ross : 16,304 s uare feet LOCATION: 3700 NE 4th Street WORK ORDER NO: 77548 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting administrative site plan review and environmental review of a proposal to construct a two-story, 16,384 sf commercial building, 44 parking spaces and associated improvements. The ground floor would contain 8,028 sf gross of retail space and the second floor would contain 8,028 sf gross of office use. The building would be located at the front of the lot, along NE 4th St., and the parking would be at the rear. Access would be via a driveway to Queen Ave. NE. Four of the 61 trees on the site would be retained. Five street trees would be planted along the frontage, as part of a 6' landscape strip. 19 new trees are proposed along the rear property line in a 1 O' landscape strip. The applicant is required to dedicate 25' of public right-of- way along the west lot line and construct street improvements to Queen Ave. NE. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water UahVGJare Plants Recreation Umd!Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transoortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistoridCuftural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 8. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expettise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City o n Department of Planning I Building I Pu -ks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT~"":.1 ,~"-"e::---------+-=C:..:O:..:M:.::M:.::E=Nc.:Tc.:S:...:D:..:U:.:E:::_:Mc:.:.:..A.::R_:_C=-:..cH:_1.:_6cc,c.:2=-0=-Q=-6::_ _____ _ APPLICATION NO: LUAOB-014, SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH? once APPLICANT: Paul Wu PROJECT MANAGER(Valerie Kinas! ~ PROJECT TITLE: Le Development Retail/Office Blda. PLAN REVIEW: Juliana Fries SITE AREA: 33,128 square feet BUILDING AREA lnross): 16,304 square feet LOCATION: 3700 NE 4th Street WORK ORDER NO: 77548 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting administrative site plan review and environmental review of a proposal to construct a two-story, 16,384 sf commercial building, 44 parking spaces and associated improvements. The ground floor would contain 8,028 sf gross of retail space and the second floor would contain 8,028 sf gross of office use. The building would be located at the front of the lot, along NE 4th St., and the parking would be at the rear. Access would be via a driveway to Queen Ave. NE. Four of the 61 trees on the site would be retained. Five street trees would be planted along the frontage, as part of a 6' landscape strip. 19 new trees are proposed along the rear property line in a 1 O' landscape strip. The applicant is required to dedicate 25' of public right-of- way along the west lot line and construct street improvements to Queen Ave. NE. A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housinn Air Aesthetics Water Linht/G/are Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals TranSrlortation Environmental Health Public Sentices Energy/ Natural Resources HisloridCu/tural Presentation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 8-POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. CYa A~<> 2 Signature of Director or Authoriz; Representative Date Z:~n11tts7oZi; City of I _ on Department of Planning I Building I Public • ork~,_.,/'s./ ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: f ll )\j c,p COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 16, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-014, SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 2, 2006 APPLICANT: Paul Wu PROJECT MANAGER: Valerie Kinast PROJECT TITLE: Le Develooment Retail/Office Blda. PLAN REVIEW: Juliana Fries SITE AREA: 33,128 sauare feet BUILDING AREA lnross\: 16,304 sauare feet LOCATION: 3700 NE 4th Street I WORK ORDER NO: 77548 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting administrative site plan review and environmental review of a proposal to construct a two-story, 16,384 sf commercial building, 44 parking spaces and associated improvements. The ground floor would contain 8,028 sf gross of retail space and the second floor would contain 8,028 sf gross of office use. The building would be located at the front of the lot, along NE 4th St., and the parking would be at the rear. Access would be via a driveway to Queen Ave. NE. Four of the 61 trees on the site would be retained. Five street trees would be planted along the frontage, as part of a 6' landscape strip. 19 new trees are proposed along the rear property line in a 1 O' landscape strip. The applicant is required to dedicate 25' of public right-al- way along the west lot line and construct street improvements to Queen Ave. NE. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS fu /iftV" c «f.e 11v .:! m c '-I -3 -o 4 cl" - (a.6)-~uM "'tP~ ~1~-'-''-. ;.ed.uht4h {,nu·U.-u=,_.f_ 5;i-u,t.-/:cc Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary HousinQ Aesthetics Lioht!Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cuflura/ Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additi;(onaf in~formationz·s e;ded to.properly assess this proposal. Ct 2 '; ,::: . 1f} / CJ i J, LI J;/ Signature of Director or Authorized Rep entative Date f Project Name: Project Address: Contact Person: Permit Number: "Le_ ~--\u\,,.,i /~UL 1:,\c\3 3700 tJ 8 '-i .j ., 'S 17U..1::J- S# \0 8$ Project Description: _,_\Y\'-'-'-'•'>l:;.:;t'.:::.;4,-;.::0--=-:.'"°.:::S::-l:c::-,._·---'-"'-"'~~""""'-"Co=~-+c"""'-_....i),..lcl"""l-~-------- ®-cf £0 tt~--l 60~t'.? IP ~ Land Use Type: Method of Calculation: 0 Residential ~Retail £--Non-retail .Cl~lculatfon: j.f\5. I;). Mi \q:) \-a y.. ~,S/"~ 11\L.\>~:;,L\. oo 1ransportation . Mitigation Fee: . calculated by: el'-ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition D Traffic Study __ _.......-----..,,, 0 Other / \ (710) 4~ ' l\ · o\ r-lt,'C<c, .is I 014) Sfecu,---'-~ i6'.\<:_:J_ 1.-\'--\. ~;;;i pc,,v luOC ef. ·. ?:o 0 /o · .Pe,1~\Qf 1WLl.~ _ Date: :3 / q /J'I.JPY . --,i--:-.,'--'--'--'------- Date of Payment: -------,-------~---- • City o n Department of Planning I Building I Pub s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: t_\ COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 16, 2006 DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 2, 2006 APPLICANT: Paul Wu PROJECT MANAGER: Valerie Kinast PROJECT TITLE: Le Develo ment Retail/Office Bid PLAN REVIEW: Juliana Fries SITE AREA: 33,128 s uare feet BUILDING AREA ross: 16,304 s LOCATION: 3700 NE 41 " Street WORK ORDER NO: 77548 BUILDING DIVISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting administrative site plan review and environmental review of a proposal to construct a two-story, 16,384 sf commercial building, 44 parking spaces and associated improvements. The ground floor would contain 8,028 sf gross of retail space and the second floor would contain 8,028 sf gross of office use. The building would be located at the front of the lot, along NE 4th St., and the parking would be at the rear. Access would be via a driveway to Queen Ave. NE. Four of the 61 trees on the site would be retained. Five street trees would be planted along the frontage, as part of a 6' landscape strip. 19 new trees are proposed along the rear property line in a 1 O' landscape strip. The applicant is required to dedicate 25' of public right-al- way along the west lot line and construct street improvements to Queen Ave. NE. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable Mora Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housiiin Air Aesthetics Water LinhtJG/are Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnorlation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historie/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ~~ We have reviewed this application ith particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wh additional informatio needed to properly assess /his proposal. 3-to-or; Date City o n Department of Planning I Building I Pu s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: \1"; , /, , , COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 16, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-014, SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 2, 2006 APPLICANT: Paul Wu PROJECT MANAGER: Valerie Kinast PROJECT TITLE: Le Develooment Retail/Office Sida. PLAN REVIEW: Juliana Fries SITE AREA: 33,128 sauare feet BUILDING AREA (aross): 16,304 sauare feet LOCATION: 3700 NE 4'" Street I WORK ORDER NO: 77548 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting administrative site plan review and environmental review of a proposal to construct a two-story, 16,384 sf commercial building, 44 parking spaces and associated improvements. The ground floor would contain 8,028 sf gross of retail space and the second floor would contain 8,028 sf gross of office use. The building would be located at the front of the lot, along NE 4th St., and the parking would be at the rear. Access would be via a driveway to Queen Ave. NE. Four of the 61 trees on the site would be retained. Five street trees would be planted along the frontage, as part of a 6' landscape strip. 19 new trees are proposed along the rear property line in a 1 O' landscape strip. The applicant is required to dedicate 25' of public right-al- way along the west lot line and construct street improvements to Queen Ave. NE. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources ' ...,..flu. t( Cl Lt rlc:i, l?7l/Yi ( B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS I• ' .) Element of the Probable Environment Minor Impacts Housinn Aesthetics UnhVGlare Recreation Utilities TranS'".,rtation Public Services Histon'c/Cullural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet . . J -( 7 1 L; Yi c (5 / /6 M/?/d, Probable Mora Major Information Impacts Necessary We have reviewed this app/scat1on with particular attention to those areas ,n which we have expertise and have 1dent1fted areas of probable rmpact or a,eas ~he'.e a)d:1t1onL:~;f_for~{f1oln :s_;;:d~j_d to properly assess this proposal _ ~ Jc )xj., 1~4J0 ,,l! fu.C ,_) '1 !.L !(.. Signature' ofbtt"ector or A.uthonzed Representative Date r I DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PLANNING/BUILDING/ PUBLIC \VORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM March 8, 2006 Valerie Kinast Juliana Fries (x:7278) LE Develo~ment Retail/Office Bldg· LUA 06 -014 3700 NE 41 Street I have reviewed the application for this commercial site, located at NE 4th Street and have the following comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER The proposed development is within the City of Renton' s water service area. There is an existing 12-inch water main in NE 4th Street, fronting the parcel that can deliver 5500 gpm (refer to City project plan no. W-0238). The static pressure at street level is about 80 psi. There is also a 10-inch water main along the west property line. This water main runs north-south. 3. These water mains are in the 565-water pressure zone. The site is within Aquifer Protection Zone 2. Fire flow has been determined to be 2500 gpm. SEWER STORM STREETS There is an 8-inch sewer main in NE 4th Street. There is an existing 8-inch sewer main along the west property line. This project drains to the Cedar River Basin (Mount Olivet sub-basin). A drainage report in accordance with the 1998 KCSWDM has been submitted. The applicant is proposing a vault for flow control and basic water quality. There are street improvements along NE 4th St. Street improvements. There is pavement along Queen Ave NE. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. A pressure reduce valve will be required. 2. Water System Development Charge in the amount of $0.273/sq.ft. of property apply. This fee is payable with the utility construction permit. 3. Preliminary fire flow is 2,750 gpm. City Code requires the installation of a looped water main around the buildings or complex of buildings when the fire flow demand exceeds 2,500 gpm. 4. Minimum of three fire hydrants are required. Existing hydrants will be required to be retrofitted with Storz "quick disconnect" fittings. 5. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly for fire sprinkler systems. Devices installed shall be per the latest Department of Health "Approved List" of Backflow Prevention Devices. Civil plans shall note: "Separate plans and utility permit for DDCVA installation for Fire Sprinkler System will be required". If backflow device is to be installed inside the building, applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing location and installation of the device as part of the utility plan submittal. 6. Buildings that exceed 30 feet in height will require a backflow device to be installed on domestic water meters. SANITARY SEWER 1. If commercial food preparation facilities are proposed, then a grease trap or grease interceptor will be required. A separate plumbing permit will also be required. 2. Side sewer shall be a minimum 6-inch at 2% slope. 3. Sewer System Development Charge in the amount of $0.142/sq.ft. of the property apply. This fee is payable with the construction permit. 4. East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District (SAD) fees will be required. Fees are $0.069 per square-foot of the property + interest. SURFACE WATER 1. Surface Water System Development Charge in the amount of $0.265/sq.ft. of new impervious area apply. This fee is payable with the utility construction permit. 2. Applicant will be required to submit separate structural plans for review and approval under a building permit for proposed detention vault. Special inspection from the building department is required. TRANSPORTATION 1. Off-site improvements including sidewalk. curb and gutter, street paving, stormwater conveyance system, landscaping and street lighting will be required along the frontage of the development with Queen Ave NE. 2. This project will be required to dedicate 25 feet of right-of-way to the City along the frontage of the parcel with Queen Ave NE. 3. This project is also required to dedicate 25-foot radius along the corner of NE 4th Street and Queen Ave NE. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. The Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 per additional generated trip shall be assessed. 2. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained in the "Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Geotechnical Engineering Report" dated December 14, 2005, regarding Site Preparation, Structural Fill and Erosion Hazards and Mitigation. 3. The applicant shall be required to provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual and provide staff with a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of Construction permits. PLAN REVIEW · GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 3. Separate permits for water meters and backflow device are required. When plans are complete two copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate and application fee shall be submitted at the sixth floor counter. cc: Kayren Kittrick City o n Department of Planning I Building I Pu s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: T), ,-, --;, · , · r 1,,,v ,-r,~1._,; c.· '· APPLICATION NO: LUA06-014, SA-A, ECF APPLICANT: Paul Wu PROJECT TITLE: Le Develooment Retail/Office Bldo. SITE AREA: 33,128 souare feet LOCATION: 3700 NE 4" Street COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 16, 2006 DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 2, 2006 PROJECT MANAGER: Valerie Kinast PLAN REVIEW: Juliana Fries BUILDING AREA lnrossl: 16,304 souare feet WORK ORDER NO: 77548 MAil: 6 ~JU6 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting administrative site plan review and environmental review of a proposal to construct a two-story, 16,384 sf commercial building, 44 parking spaces and associated improvements. The ground floor would contain 8,028 sf gross of retail space and the second floor would contain 8,028 sf gross of office use. The building would be located at the front of the lot, along NE 4th St., and the parking would be at the rear. Access would be via a driveway to Queen Ave. NE. Four of the 61 trees on the site would be retained. Five street trees would be planted along the frontage, as part of a 6' landscape strip. 19 new trees are proposed along the rear property line in a 1 O' landscape strip. The applicant is required to dedicate 25' of public right-al- way along the west lot line and construct street improvements to Queen Ave. NE. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major lnformatiot1 Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Waler Liaht/G/are Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Natural Resources Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS SRL ~ We have reviewed this application ·th particular attention to those areas m which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or dditional informatio 1s eeded to properly assess this proposal. Date City o n Department of Planning I Building I Pu s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 5._.,· · COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 16, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-014, SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 2, 2006 APPLICANT: Paul Wu PROJECT MANAGER: Valerie Kinast PROJECT TITLE: Le Develo ment Retail/Office Bid PLAN REVIEW: Juliana Fries SITE AREA: 33,128 s uare feet BUILDING AREA ross : 16,304 s LOCATION: 3700 NE 41 h Street WORK ORDER NO: 77548 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting administrative site plan review and environmental review of a proposal to construct a two-story, 16,384 sf commercial building, 44 parking spaces and associated improvements. The ground floor would contain 8,028 sf gross of retail space and the second floor would contain 8,028 sf gross of office use. The building would be located at the front of the lot, along NE 4th St, and the parking would be at the rear. Access would be via a driveway to Queen Ave. NE. Four of the 61 trees on the site would be retained. Five street trees would be planted along the frontage, as part of a 6' landscape strip. 19 new trees are proposed along the rear property line in a 1 O' landscape strip. The applicant is required to dedicate 25' of public right-al- way along the west lot line and construct street improvements to Queen Ave. NE. A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earlh Housinn Air Aesthetics Water Linht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnorlation Environmental Health Public Services Energy! Natural Resources Histonc/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ~~ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas w ere additional inform o is needed to properly assess this proposal. Date , DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MITIGATION ITEMS: FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM March 3, 2006 Valerie Kinast, Associate Planner James Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal r}__ $ Le Development Retail/Office Bldg., 3700 NE 4th St 1. A fire mitigation fee of$8,519.68 is required based on $.52 per square foot of the building square footage. FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1.. -r, 17,:: ... · ,,. ·t,...·"7 1. The preliminary fire flow is* GPM, o~'e hydrant is required with 150 feet of the structure and two additional hydrants arc required within 300 feet of the structure. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of sprinkler and fire alarm systems. 3. The wet retention vault must be designed and certified by a structural engineer to withstand the load of the fire apparatus, 4. Provide a list of flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemical that may be used or stored on site. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. i:\lcdevelopementerc.doc City Department of Planning I Building I Pu s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: F 1 re .. COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 16, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-014, SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 2, 2006 . . ....-, ., APPLICANT: Paul Wu PROJECT MANAGER: Valeriefl<1nast -----------· PROJECT TITLE: Le Development Retail/Office Bldn. PLAN REVIEW: Juliana Fries ", n ~ •••• 1111 "• ,J ~ ......... SITE AREA: 33,128 square feet BUILDING AREA lnrossl: 16,304 square feet , LOCATION: 3700 NE 4th Street WORK ORDER NO: 77548 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting administrative site plan review ani:lenltiroAmeA!al review of-a;:,roposaHo construct a two-story, 16,384 sf commercial building, 44 parking spaces and associated improvements. The ground floor would contain 8,028 sf gross of retail space and the second floor would contain 8,028 sf gross of office use. The building would be located at the front of the lot, along NE 4th St., and the parking would be at the rear. Access would be via a driveway to Queen Ave. NE. Four of the 61 trees on the site would be retained. Five street trees would be planted along the frontage, as part of a 6' landscape strip. 19 new trees are proposed along the rear property line in a 1 O' landscape strip. The applicant is required to dedicate 25' of public right-al- way along the west lot line and construct street improvements to Queen Ave. NE. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code} COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housinn Air Aesthetics Water Lfnht!Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy! Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed t is application with particular attention to those Dreas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio al information is ded to properly assess this proposal. Date NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: LANO USE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: Mal"(:h 3, 2006 LUA06-014. SA-A. ECF Le Development Reb1iVOffice Building PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The ap~icant is requesting admlntSlrabve sHe plan review an,:i env1ronmenl31 ,.......,. of a proposal 1o construct a two-story, 16,384 sf oommer,:ial bl.Jildlng, 44 parlling spaces and assoc,ote<:I impn:,,,.,mems. The gro....-.:1 floor would contain B,028 sf gross of re1all space ar,:I the seoorid floor would contain 8.028 sf gross of office,,,.., The building would be localed at the front of the lot, along NE 4th st., and the parking would be tit the raar. Access would be via a driveway 1o Que,en Ave. NE. Four of u...,, tl1 I-on the srte would bf., retained. f,,,.., street !rem would be planted alor,g the frontage, as part of a 15" landscap<:i stnp. 19 new trees are proposed cilong the rear property line in a 10· landsaipe strip. The apphcant is requored to ded,cate 25' of public right-of-way olong 1he wes1 lot line and oonstruct street improvements to Queen Ave NE. PROJECT LOCATION: 3700 NE 4" Str....t OVTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON•SIGNIFICAHCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M): 11.s the Lead Agency, !he C~y of Renton tu. d•ermiried that signilkant emSmnmllfltal impacts are urilikely to result from the proposed prOiect Therefore as permilt&d unde< the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is us;ng the Optional DNS-M process io give notjce that a DNS· M io likely to be is.sued. Comment peliods for the project arid the proposed DNS-M are integrated mto a ~,ngle comment period. The<e will be no comment peliod following 1he issuance of the Threshold Dete-rmination of Non-S,gn1f1cance· Mitigated (DNS-M). A 14-<lay appeal period will folklw the Issuance of the DNS-M PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: February 14, 2006 March 3, 2006 APPLICANTIPFl:OJECT CONTACT PERS OH: Pa._. Wu, Wu An::hlbtctuN; l•I: (425) 503--218.2; Eml: paulzwu@aol.com P•rmlta/Review Requested: Envlronmental (SEPAi Review, Admlnlatnrtlva S~ Ptan approval Othar Permits which may be n,quin,d: Construction & Building Permits Raquest.d Studia•: Environmental Checktbc Location where application may be ravlewad: Plannlng/Bulldlng/Publle Works Department, DaWlot>merlt Services Oivlslon, Slx1h Floor Ranl<>n City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renl<>n, WA 118055 PUBLIC HEARING: NIA CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Usa: Envlronmenlal Document• that Elo'aluata tha Proposad Project Development fwguhrtlons UN<! For Peoject Ml1i9atlon: The subj-ect s~e is designated Commercial Corridor(CC) on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land u ... Map and Commercial Arterial [CA) on the Crty·s Zoning Map. The site is in the NE 4~ Street Business Dl&bict Environmerrtal (SEPA) Checi<list The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, Zoning Code. Public Works Standards, Building Code, Fire Code and other applicable bu,ld,ng and construction standards and regulatlOns as appropriate Proposed Mitigation Measures: The followirq M~,gation ~easures will like~ be imposed on the pro?"'a<I riroject Thes~ '.ecomme..-.:led Mitigalioo Measur,as addre&S project imp.acts not covefOO by existing codes end regulations as caed above The appl/cant will be r.quir.d to pay the ~propm,r,, Tn1nspo,tat.lorr '11/Jtlglltlon Fa.; The applicant. will be required ro p,ay Iha appropriate FW. Mitlgatlorr I=..; ,.r,d The •pHeanr wlU ti. .-.qulrad ro pay the appropriate Parh: Mit/gat}orr FN. Comments on the above_ application m....t t.. ,ubmlnad In writing lo Valarie Klnut, Anoclat, Plannu, Development Services_ Ohnslon, 1055 _South Grady Wa~, Renton, WA 910~~. by &:()() PM on M•ch 17, 200I. If)''"' have quesbons abou1 this proposal. orwosh to be made a par1y or ,e,cord and receive eddaional rotificatlon by mail contact the ProJoot Manager. An)'One wh, subm,ts writen comment,, will 11utomalically become II party of record and w~I be r10t1fied of anyde,:,sk)n on this proJeci CONTACT PERSON: Valerie Kinast, Associate Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7270 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION If _YOU would like to be made a party of record to receive further infomiaHon on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning. 1055 So. Grady Way. Renton, WA 98055 Name/File No · Le Devejopment RetaWOffice Building/LUA06-014. SA-A, ECF NAME MAILING ADDRESS I ELEPHONE NO.: CERTIFICATION U'. ATTEST· Subscnbed and sworn before me, a Nota1y Puhhc, m and for the State of Washmgton res1dmg m , \.: 0 ,\n,. ":xufi\.'\ \i\J,4c ,on the -j dayof \ \, ,\'' /,CU\: Clc\_1'lc-~1< Qf4v~-- NOTARY PUBLIC SIGNAT~ ' ' . ~: ,., ... CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 3'd day of March, 2006, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Ur, NOA, Environmental Checklist, PMT's documents. This information was sent to: Name Agencies -NOA, Env. Checklist, PMT's Paul Wu, Wu Architecture -Accpt Ur K & F Investments -NOA, Accpt Ur Surrounding Property Owners -NOA only (Signature of Sender}: 7 ~\1/ Jut, STATE OF WASHINGTON ~ ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) See Attached Contact Owner See Attached Notary (Print): My appointment expires: \~\\\, \ l j ;- '}-\ '\ -\ O Project Name: Le Development Retail/Office Bldg Project Number: LUA06-014, SA-A, ECF template -affidavit of service by mailing Representing .. ,. ' Dept. of Ecology• Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olvmoia, WA 98504-7703 AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Stewart Reinbold • Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. c/o Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 3190 160th Ave SE 39015 -172"' Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008 Auburn, WA 98092 . WSDOT Northwest Region • Duwamish Tribal Office ' Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program • Attn: Ramin Pazooki 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172"' Avenue SE PO Box 330310 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers• KC Wastewater Treatment Division* Office of Archaeology & Historic Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Attn: SEPA Reviewer Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer PO Box C-3755 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98124 Seattle. WA 981_04-3855 Olvmoia, WA 98504-8343 Jamey Taylor• Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olvmoia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton, WA 98055-1219 13020 SE 72'' Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Senior Environmental Planner Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Title Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 . Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. • Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERG Determination paperwork. template ~ affidavit of service by mailing I ' I I I .. ·· ........ 162305902502 DEMO CORP PO BOX 2078 RENTON WA 98056 683840002003 MATI MALASPINA & CO INC 309 S CLOVERDALE ST #C-1 SEATILE WA 98108 092305904903 UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRST C/0 EPROPERTY TAX PO BOX 4900 SCOTISDALE AZ 85261 092305923101 K & F INVESTMENT LLC 10802 CORNELL AVES SEATILE WA 98178 092305917608 SIKOV PETER H+HELEN J PO BOX 22286 SEATILE WA 98122 092305919703 WINDEMERE REAL ESTATE RENTON 3800 NE 4TH ST RENTON WA 98056 092305923309 KPF PROPERTY LLC 3770 NE 4TH ST RENTON WA 98056 162305900100 STARK BEN G PO BOX 98638 SEATILE WA 98198 C ·t f R t D£11£Lop 1 y o en on c17Y~Nrp1_,q LAND USE PERMIT Fi FIENfo~NING fB 14 2006 MASTER APPLICATIONREcE,vco PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: K { F {J..\\1~1--lENTS PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: LE: D\=VELoPfvlENT ADDRESS: 10602. cO{<tJE\..L A\Jf= . S . CITY: S~TTLE', WA ~IP:CJBI 7S PROJECT/AOORESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: NI; 4-"™ STREtT ~ ~~J4'V]A-~·~eio5?- TELEPHONE NUMBER: :2.06-2.14-'5 (74 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): APPLICANT (if other than owner) o~ 2 :>05 -'72..3' I NAME: PAVL WU, AIA,CSI EXISTING LAND USE(S): CA-cONK~CIA L f\Rr$1.AL COMPA~LJ apAcaRCH (f E'CT URE PROPOSED LAND USE(S): cA -COHM\:Rc.{AL AP=f€RlAL ADDRESS: f>f> l7 N~ l(/;:tH fl.ACE EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: cc C!J' .. ·-iA.:L C6~tt>oR.. CITY: kl RKt..AtJJ) I WA . ZIP:?f>03 4-PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): cc.. ' TELEPHONE NUMBER Ll.2':>-5o~-2.182. EXISTING ZONING: CA CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (ii applicable): CA NAME: PAUi-WU, A IA, (5,I , SITE AREA (in square feet): 3,3,, ti£> ').f. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC: ROADWAYS TO BE COMPANY (if applicable): vJU ARCH1T!:r.-TVRt DEDICATED: '..\P>'65 S..F. . SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: ADDRESS: N-A . €)'ti l 7 NE ({ 6 ~ A.Ac~ PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY: ZIP: ACRE (if applicable): 1-J .A . KlR\CLA.,J.t>, WA. 9Bo.;4 NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: tJ ·"" . 42. ':> -~ 0'3,-2..l 8 2. Pcud Z Wl,l(o) et.of. COfV\ I NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): ~-A. -- Pnv1JECT INFORMATION (conti,,Jed) r------'------'--'----'------------, NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): - SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): -- SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): - SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROP,SED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): I (n . 00r-Sr SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): -- NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): ---- PROJECT VALUE: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): Q AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE Q AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO Q FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. Q GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. Q HABITATCONSERVATlON sq. ft. Q SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. Q WETLANDS sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal descriotion on separate sheet with the following Information Included) SITUATE IN THE QUARTER OF SECTION_, TOWNSHIP_, RANGE_, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGiON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List ~I land use applications being app~d for: 1 J ,, -4 fJcf-~"'r. !21 V; -l ,v) i' t O ?J-0 -(L:'-3. • ,<J.-t2 2. 6r) V) V'. f2.vvi· .£AA.I II 5chJ, ~ 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $':;><, AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Namels) A (p >< k!V!>F-tL £.:; . , declare that I am (please check one) \I' the current owner of the property involved in this application or __ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing stat"!JIGA\5 and answers herein contained and the lnfonnallon herewith are in all res. peels true and correct to the best al my knowledge and belief. . I lcertifythatlknoworhavesatislactoryevidencethat Aux MDtR LE · • C/• signed this instrument and acknowledged It to be hislherilheir free and ~~ act for the / / ~ , uses and purposes mentioned in the instnment _ ..... ,~~'...tG ~~''1,, . --.~v" ,~ ,, .:-~ '<' ........... u,, .... ' A'I .: r'::'-.··\sSlON tc~•.'":-c, ,, (Signalllre of Owner/ epresentative) ff, / : -.1 -~~ _ -1"'3,-·· v-~1 ·; ; /o ~01 --· ~\ ~ l : ;O 'l'.): ~ ,, • ..... • I' ----+-\--++wt----------L : I 1 f 'I. c.r> •• ..ouo:x..:.. : <' : Notary P j io and the State ofWashlogton '~ -" \ / 0 : ""'f ,, "1;. ··,.'1.29-01 / c} .c ,,, 1$' .......... • \~ .c· '•i: O,~ WAS'r\ · ~-=-~· 1, '· ~. ·.,, ' --~ ... --..... {Signature of Owner/Representative) My appointment expires:_4--'-·_,_/_J_q_._· -1-/_o'--7L.-__ . .· ' PROJECT IMTA STREET ADDRESS NE 4Tli STREET & QUEEN A'il:NUE NE RENTON, WA 98056 LEGAL DESCRIPTION STR 092305 TAXI.OT 231 S 180 FT. OF W 1 /2 OF SW 1 / 4 OF SE: 1/4 OF SE 1/4 LESS 165 FT OF S 130 FT TliEREOF LESS CO ROAD LESS C/M RGTS EASEMENT PSP&L TRANSMISSION LINE TAX ACCOUNT NUMBERS 092305-9231 SITE & LOT COVERAGE PROPERTY AREA: BUILDING COVER: 33,128 S.F. (0.76 ACRE) 8,028 S.F. LOT COVERAGE: 8028/33128 ~ 24.2% (OK) IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREAS EXISTING: TOTAL PER"10US 30,288 SJ. IMPER"10US 2,&40 S.F. 33,128 S.F. PR<J'OSED: PER"10US 4,292 S.F. 1Mf'ER"10US 28,836 SJ. 33,126 S.F. PROJECT TEAM OWNER K & F 11\t:STMENTS Al.EX l£, OOERAL MAHMn 10602 CXREJ. A\UILE SOOllt SEAT1l£, WA 98178 206-21+-5174 FAX 206-726-11866 ARCHITECT 'MJ AROITECIURE 8817 N.E. 11611i PLACE l<IRl<l}j(),WASHNCTCll980.l+-6113 (425) 503--2182 FAX (425) 823-7888 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER ENG1NEIRS N<lllHllEST, INC. 6869 Y«XlOI.AIIN A\fNUE NE SEAT1l£, WA 98115 206-525-7560 FAX 206-522-6698 CIVIL ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TEllR,I FOONER OESIGN maJP 5212 -37™ A If.HUE SW SEA!Ilf, WA 98126 206-112Hl690 FAX 206-923--3507 LE DEVELOPMENT WU ARCHITECTURE DEV~LOPMENT p 'VELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION . 'ry OF RENT11i~NING WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FEB 1 i 200 FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS RECE 6 J..ANO QSE PERMIT SUBMITTAL . REQUIREMENTS:• Calculations 1 Colored Maps tor bis play• Construction Mitigation Description 2 AND 4 Density Worksheet 4 Drainage Control Plan, Drainage Report; Elevations, Architectural, AND, Environmental Checklist, Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)• Existing S<1seinents·.{Recorded Copy),· Flood Hazard Data• FloOr Plan.si"""' Geotechnical Report 2 AND, Grading Plan, ()onceptual 2 Grading Plan, Detailed 2 Habitat Data R11p9rt • King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site, LandscapePlan, Conceptual, Landscape Plan, Detailed, Legal Desqription, List of Surrounding Property Owners, Mailing Labels for Pmperty Owners • Map of Existing Site Conditions, Master Application Form, Monument Cards (one per monument) 1 Neighborhood Detail Map 4 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Development Planning Section Q:\WEBIPWIDEVSERV\Forms\Planninglwaiver.xls WAIVED BY: MODIFIED BY: PROJECT NAME: IVED COMMENTS: 07/29/2005 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISIOI WAIVEn OF SUBMITTAL REQUlncMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS lAl'IP l,1$1; F>I;8Mtr SUBMITTAL · ... •···•····· ··•···RI;QOIREMENTS:·•····· Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis • f'l;lli.Req\)c\iM~ (Pt..11})~· Rehabilitation Plan 4 !:lptEi~ilig Deta,il f · · · Site Plan 2 ANO 4 s@ariidiµii<e/!:ltady, $t~fomr~J···· Street Profiles 2 Title Rllpi>rt ci(Plat Qertiticate·,· Topography Map, Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 Wetlands Mit' . liti6n Plan·• f'lnill 4 ·•· · Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary 4 1/Veil~r@; Repoitfp~i111eatloti.t . · Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2 ANO, Inventory of Existing Sijes 2 ANO 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 ANO 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 ANo 3 Map of View Area 2 ANO , Photosimulations 2 ANO, . WAIVEb ?BY: This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section ' )' PROJECT NAME: __ /C:_~-'-----'--r_·-·_/_1 _/ !_. 'f_.r_f--_Yr_·.c.U'-·1_.+_,,_!_,__1/ f._i ../-(yt.A/ft 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: -~'~>_-f_·~t=.0-+-,-_Lff_,~(_) J __ _ 4. Development Planning Section Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Forms\Planning\waiver.xls 07/29/2005 - • i I ',"':;'" - '"' ---~°"~-~--_ Ps.JALCQ,_T!WIS. __ ----------------... ~-----------·-·-··- ; ' I '' ' ,, 1,.£:f ., PROJECT SITE ' :, J, ., ! ,,, .. .,.' ~"'1 '"" - Ii '""'" __'." .!~.:!' r "". flB3il~ POITRAS PLAT -- Ii """" ;s,<£ - ,.,.,. .. .. , 88 oooao~go ,I. ,t: •' - ....... , ..... - J '""°" .J .J - - - ·-· .. ,..,, - '" ...... I~ ~ ~.! I. ·- =1: ---1~ .. ":' -1: ....... "·-,,~ --~ i ... " . I . ""' . ""' . -· . ' I I I t 11~ ,."~ • t ... ,, ..... IWi:ti LU s.{tl L.Ll l "•iio"."••·- * .;;;;;,, .... - LE DEVELOPMENT WU ARCHITECTURE 1 DEVELOPMENT p f':/TY OF RF.r,rr'-t,~NING Pre-application meeting for K & F Investments (AKA Le Development) NE 4th Street & Queen Avenue NE Contact information PREOS-130 City of Renton Development Services Division October 20, 2005 Planner: Valerie Kinas!, (425) 430-7289 Public Works Plan Reviewer: Juliana Fries, ( 425) 430-7278 Fire Prevention Reviewer: James Gray ( 425) 430-7023 Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burne IL (425) 430-7290 FEB 1 ~ 2006 RECEIVED Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects and contractors who work on the project. DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: FIRE DEPARTJ\1ENT MEJ\10RANDUM October 4, 2005 Valerie Kinast, Associate Planner t1} James Gray, Assistant Fire Marshald ..,q-, K & F Investments, NE 4th & Queen Ave. NE Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 2500 GPM, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and two additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. 2. A fire mitigation fee of$9,185.28 is required based on $.52 per square foot of the building square footage. f. Li' r + j 3. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of sprinkler and fire alarm systems. / 4. Fire department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20 feet in width with a turning radius of 45 feet outside and 25 feet inside. , ,-. /,; 1,; .' ' · 5. Fire department dead end access roadways over 150 feet in length are required to have an approved turnaround. 6. Provide a list of flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are used or stored on site. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. i:\k&finvestments.doc To: CITY OF RENTON MEMO PUBLIC WORKS Valerie Kinas! From: Juliana Fries (425) 430-7278 October 19, 2005 Date: Subject: PreApplication Review Comments PREAPP No. 05-130 K & F Investments -Retail Office NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT: The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cantioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g. Hearing Examiner, Boards of Adjustment, Board of Public Works and City Council). Review colWtlents may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant. I have reviewed the preliminary application for the retail building, located at NE 4th Street and have the following comments: WATER I. The proposed development is within the City of Renton' s water service area. There is an existing 12-inch water main in NE 4th Street, fronting the parcel that can deliver 5500 gpm (refer to City project plan no. W-0238). The static pressure at street level is about 80 psi. A pressure reduce valve will be required. 2. There is also a I 0-inch water main along the west property line. This water main runs north- south. 3. These water mains are in the 565-water pressure zone. 4. Fire flow has been determined to be 2500 gpm. 5. City Code requires the installation of a looped water main around the buildings or complex of buildings when the fire flow demand exceeds 2,500 gpm. 6. Water main improvements within the development will be required to provide the required fire flow demand and for domestic water service for this project. The improvements will include but not be limited to the following: • A water main extension (minimum 8-inch). A 15-foot wide utility easement along the new water main will also be required. • Fire hydrants, fire sprinkler stubs with backflow prevention devices, domestic and landscape water meters. The Fire Marshall will determine the number and location of hydrants during the review of the project development plans. One fire hydrant will be required for each 1,000 gpm of fire flow demand. A primary hydrant shall be within 150 feet of the structures and all secondary hydrants within 300 feet. A separate domestic water meter is required for each building. C. 't.\,//,\ ' 'V 'r ( \ K & F Investments -Re . Jffice 10/19/2005 Page 2 7. The proposed project is located in Aquifer Protection Zone 2. 8. The Water System Development Charge (SOC) of $0.213/sq ft of site area will be required. SDC fees are subject to change. Iv\ o.rUl;Sly &,1 /)i,; I . vpy4c SANITARY SEWER 1. There is an 8-inch sewer main in NE 4th Street. There is also a 24-inch sewer main in NE 4th Street. 2. There is an existing 8-inch sewer main along the west property line. This sewer main runs north-south. 3. The site is subject to the East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District fee. The fee is $0.069 sq. ft. of property+ interest. 4. The Sanitary Sewer System Development Charge (SOC) is $0. 126/sq. ft. of site area will be required. SOC fees are subject to change. f-.7, o-?J Cv• fa, {_ SURFACE WATER 1. The site drains to Cedar River basin (Mount Olivet sub-basin). 2. A storm drainage plan and drainage report designed by King County Surface Water Manual (1990) is required with the formal application of the project. Due to conveyance capacity problems, staff will recommend as a SEPA condition this project to provide detention for a I 00-year storm and 30% safety factor. 3. The Surface Water System Development Charge (SDC) is $0.249/sq.ft. of new impervious area of the property will be required (not less than $715.00). SDC fees are subject to change. ! l -, ,-(.>--- C TRANSPORTATION I. Street improvements are installed along the frontage of the parcel and NE 4th Street. 2. Future redevelopment of the parcel will require a 25 feet right-of-way dedication along the , extensionofQueenAveNE. ==-==-(; Ji,: :-':L-' '. c.c,\·(1,/: /--o ~K ,f-aJ 3. Street improvements including but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalks, pavement, landscape and streetlights will be required along Queen Ave NE, fronting the parcel. 4. The proposed driveway on NE 4th St is too close to an existing ingress/egress easement abutting the eastern property line. Staff is concern with the potential impacts on traffic operations and safety on NE 4th Street. Staff finds the proposed driveway location not acceptable. ,.1, 1 , , i , ? ~-@ . r1 --,,-, I . ,,l ;1 ·( !' Or V ·· C&f' le( f 1/',rt-s vUP~I U'C..:'1--j> i:__:> YO,t,q {/~ 1 (7•-n ;_if . ' ,. ::, GENERAL COMMENTS 1. All required utility and drainage will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. Permit application must include an itemized cost of construction estimate for these improvements. 3. If you have any questions, call me at 425-430-7278 I ff,._iij;f t+f-Pvt-r-t ~ i,, e tt CC: Kayren Kittrick K & F Investments -Retail le 10/1912005 Page 2 7. The proposed project is located in Aquifer Protection Zone 2. 8. The Water System Development Charge (SDC) of $0.213/sq ft. of site area will be required. SDC fees are subject to change. SANITARY SEWER 1. There is an 8-inch sewer main in NE 4th Street. There is also a 24-inch sewer main in NE 4'" Street. 2. There is an existing 8-inch sewer main along the west property line. This sewer main runs north-south. 3. The site is subject to the East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District fee. The fee is $0.069 sq. ft. of property+ interest. 4. The Sanitary Sewer System Development Charge (SDC) is $0.126/sq. ft. of site area will be required. SDC fees are subject to change. SURFACE WATER 1. The site drains to Cedar River basin (Mount Olivet sub-basin). 2. A storm drainage plan and drainage report designed by King County Surface Water Manual (1990) is required with the formal application of the project. Due to conveyance capacity problems, staff will recommend as a SEPA condition this project to provide detention for a 100-year storm and 30% safety factor. 3. The Surface Water System Development Charge (SDC) is $0.249/sq.ft. of new impervious area of the property will be required (not less than $715.00). SDC fees are subject to change. TRANSPORTATION 1. Street improvements are installed along the frontage of the parcel and NE 4th Street. 2. Future redevelopment of the parcel will require a 25 feet right-of-way dedication along the extension of Queen Ave NE. 3. Street improvements including but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalks, pavement, landscape and streetlights will be required along Queen Ave NE, fronting the parcel. 4. The proposed driveway on NE 4th St is too close to an existing ingress/egress easement abutting the eastern property line. Staff is concern with the potential impacts on traffic operations and safety on NE 4"' Street. Staff finds the proposed driveway location not acceptable. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. All required utility and drainage will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. Permit application must include an itemized cost of construction estimate for these , improvements. 3. If you have any questions, call me at 425-430-7278 CC: Kayren Kittrick To: From: Date: Subject: CITY OF RENTON MEMO PUBLIC WORKS Valerie Kinas! Juliana Fries ( 425) 430-7278 October 19, 2005 PreApplication Review Comments PREAPP No. 05-130 K & F Investments-Retail Office NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT: The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g. Hearing Examiner, Boards of Adjustment, Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant. I have reviewed the preliminary application for the retail building, located at NE 4th Street and have the following comments: WATER 1. The proposed development is within the City of Renton' s water service area. There is an existing 12-inch water main in NE 4th Street, fronting the parcel that can deliver 5500 gpm (refer to City project plan no. W-0238). The static pressure at street level is about 80 psi. A pressure reduce valve will be required. 2. There is also a I 0-inch water main along the west property line. This water main runs north- south. 3. These water mains are in the 565-water pressure zone. 4. Fire flow has been determined to be 2500 gpm. 5. City Code requires the installation of a looped water main around the buildings or complex of buildings when the fire flow demand exceeds 2,500 gpm. 6. Water main improvements within the development will be required to provide the required fire flow demand and for domestic water service for this project. The improvements will include but not be limited to the following: • A water main extension (minimum 8-inch). A 15-foot wide utility easement along the new water main will also be required. • Fire hydrants, fire sprinkler stubs with backflow prevention devices, domestic and ' . landscape water meters. The Fire Marshall will determine the number and location of hydrants during the review of the project development plans. One fire hydrant will be required for each 1,000 gpm of fire flow demand. A primary hydrant shall be within 150 feet of the structures and all secondary hydrants within 300 feet. A separate domestic water meter is required for each building. DATE: CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMOR4..NDUM October 20, 2005 i TO: ~rm * tc prJf , i J Pre-Application File No. PREOS-130 FROM: SUBJECT: Valerie Kinas!, Associate Planner, (425) 430-7289 K & F Investments (AKA Le Development) New 17,664 square foot, two-story retail and office building on the north-eastern corner of NE 4'• St. and Queen Ave. NE General: We have completed a preliminary review of the above-referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decis10n-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Development Services Director, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. '11,e Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax, from the Finance Divisipn on the first floor of City Hall. Project Proposal: The subject property is located on the north side of NE 4th Street and east of Queen Ave. NE. The proposal is to build a 17,664 square foot, two-story building for retail and office use. The applicant is proposing 48 parking stalls. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The existing development is located within the Commercial Corridor (CC) Comprehensive Plan land use designation. The following policies are applicable to the proposal: Community Design Element Policy CD-43. A variety of architectural design and detailing should be encouraged as long as site functions connect to adjacent development. Innovative use of building materials and finishes should be promoted. Policy CD-67. Street trees should be used to reinforce visual corridors along major boulevards and streets. Land Use Element Objective LU-QQQ: The Northeast Fourth Corridor Business District should be enhanced to imprQve efficiency, safety and attractiveness to both potential shoppers and pass-through traffic. Policy LU-335. Increased demand for commercial uses should be accommodated primarily through redevelopment and intensification of existing business area designations rather than expansion of those areas. K & F Investments (AKA Le October 20, 2005 Page 2 of5 lopment) Pre-Application Meeting Objective LU-GGG: Guide redevelopment of land in the Commercial Conidor designation with Commercial Arterial zoning, from the existing strip commercial urban forms into more concentrated forms, in which structures and parking evolve from the existing suburban form, to more efficient urban configurations with cohesive site planning, Policy LU-346. Support the redevelopment of commercial business districts located along principal arterials in the City, Policy LU-347. Implement development standards that encourage lively, attractive, medium to high- density commercial areas. Policy LU-349. Support development plans incorporating the following features: 1) Shared access points and fewer curb cuts; 2) Internal circulation among adjacent parcels; 3) Shared parking facilities; 4) Allowance for future transition to structured parking facilities; 5) Centralized signage; 6) Unified development concepts; and 7) Landscaping and streetscape that softens visual impacts. Policy LU-350. New development in Commercial Conidor designated areas should be encouraged to implement uniform site standards, including: 1) Minimum lot depth of 200 feet; 2) Maximum height often (10) stories within office-zoned designations; 3) Parking preferably at the rear of the building, or on the side as a second choice; 4) Setbacks that would allow incorporating a landscape buffer; 5) Front setback without frontage street or driveway between building and sidewalk; and 6) Common signage and lighting system. Zoning designation and consistency of land use: The subject property is located within the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation in the NE 4th Commercial Conidor and Business District. In the CA zone, the proposed uses of retail and office are permitted uses. The retail and office uses have a limit of 65,000 square feet each in the NE 4th Conidor Overlay. The project proposes far less than this. In the NE 4th Conridor, the office use is also limited to 50% of the gross square footage of the site. The project falls well below this limit also. So the uses and their extent are in conformance with the zoning requirements of the site. The property to the north of the site is zoned Residential Multi-Family (RM-F). To the east, west and south the properties are zoned CA. To the south-west, across the street, is a lot zoned Residential 8 du/acre (R-8). Critical Areas: Based on the City's Critical Areas Maps, the site is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2. In the AP A Zones, certain types of facilities are prohibited and the use and storage of hazar~ous materials is restricted. There are also additional requirements during construction and fill activities. If the project requires more than I 00 cubic yards of fill, a fill source statement will be required. 05-130 K&F Investments (CA, 4th Overlay, retail, office).doc\ K & F Investments (AKA Le Devel--mcnt) Pre-Application ~1ceting October 20, 2005 Page 3 of5 Although further critical areas are not indicated on the City of Renton critical areas maps, it is the applicant's responsibility to ascertain whether critical areas, such as wetlands, are present on their site. If so, the site design would need to be revised accordingly. Development Standards: The subject site is currently undeveloped. The following standards apply to new development on the site. Lot coverage-The CA zone allows a maximum building coverage of 65% of the lot area or 75% of the lot area if parking is provided within the building or within an on-site parking garage. The proposed building would result in approximately 27% lot coverage, which complies with city lot coverage regulations. Setbacks -Setbacks are the distance ·between the building and the property line or any private access easement. The required front yard setback for the subject lot in the CA zone is a minimum of 10 feet that may be reduced if the front fas,ade is not blank. The side yard setback from a street is also a minimum of 10 feet and may be reduced to O. In the NE 4"' St. Business District there is a maximum front yard setback limitation of 15 feet. The minimum required interior side yard setback is O feet, because the site does not abut residentially zoned property to the east. The minimum rear yard setback of the project is 15 feet because the lot abuts property zoned RM-F. The submitted plans propose 5-foot setbacks from NE 4th and Queen Ave. NE. Staff is not likely to support this reduction because of the impacts to frontage improvements, landscaping and accessibility from the street. Specifically, the 5-foot setback impedes access at the point of the bns shelter and does not allow appropriate landscaping. Building height -Building height is restricted to 35 feet in the NE 4tl• Corridor. The proposal appears to meet this requirement. Landscaping: A minimum IO-foot wide landscape strip is required along the street frontages. This requirement may be reduced through the site plan review process. The proposal includes no landscaping along the street frontages along NE 4th or Queen Ave. NE. In order to meet policies and codes, a minimum of 10 feet of landscaping, including street trees, should be proposed. Some reduction may be possible. A 15 foot wide landscaped visual barrier is required at the north of the lot where the site abuts the RM- F residential zone. This can be reduced to IO feet if sight-obscuring vegetation is provided. Please refer to the attached landscape regulations (RMC 4-4-070) for general and specific landscape requirements. All landscape areas are to include an underground sprinkling system. Some of the other aspects of landscaping that must be addressed include: the type and location of trees and other plants, soils to be nsed, drainage, and berming. In addition to the landscaping required along the site's street frontages and rear lot line, surface parking lots with between 15 and 50 parking spaces are required to install a minimum of 15 square feet of landscaping per parking space. The proposal does not appear to include the required 720 square feet of parking lot landscaping. Specifications for the landscaping of parking lots can be found in the copy of the Parking Loading and Driveway Regulations under F.7., which I have included with this memo. A conceptual landscape plan and landscape analysis meeting the requirements in RMC 4-8- 1200, enclosed, shall be submitted at the time of application for Site Plan Review. 05-130 K&F Investments (CA, 4th Overlay, retail, officc).doc\ , r K & F Investments (AKA Le October 20, 2005 lopment) Pre-Application Meeting ( i. wcct, :'2· i\ Page 4 of 5 Access: Access to the lot by car is proposed from Queen Ave. NE via a 24-foot wide driveway and /y(A'. -.;) ( from NE 4th Street via a 30-foot wide access easement over the lot to the east. RMC4-4-080I limits , l)i)•:c+) _ -'le. driveway width to 40% of the lot frontage. The proposed driveway from the west would span only , , .! 0 '·(:/· [" 16% of the Queen Street NE frontage and thus be in conformance with the regulations. The driveway '• -. c\l -) . from NE 4th Street would run d!fectly parallel to the dnveway to the apartment complex on the G U•t ct · [.fr neighboring lot. Staff would not support locating the driveway in such close proximity to another ;,u _(( C , driveway along NE 4th Street. JI \Ck •'.'H I'. i'he city development regulations_require a "pedestrian connectio.n be provided from a public entra~ce , . ~f:;_)i,cb::-" to the street, m order to proVJde dtrect, clear and separate pedestnan walks from sidewalks to bmldmg ·.,. '· , .· entries and iritemally from buildings to abutting retail properties." At the time of submittal, the site ',. i' · .:' \llan should show accessible routes of travel to the building from NE 4th Street. <i' ,_ . ., '· ".Parking: The parking ratios required of the project are: Retail 0.4 per 100 square feet, office 0.3 per 100 square feet and storage I per 1500 square feet. A total of 48 parking stalls would be required to serve the proposed new building. Two of these would need to meet ADA requirements. The submitted J. , materials indicate 48 parking stalls behind the building, including two meeting ADA requirements. The parking regulations require most stalls to be 20 feet by 9 feet. 30% of the stalls may be compact sized, 8.5 feet by 16 feet. The proposal indicates 13 compact stalls, which would constitute 27% of the stalls and thus meet the requirements. The remaining stalls shown in the proposal are 19 feet by 9 feet, so they are less than the required 20-foot length. The design would either need to be revised before formal submittal to meet the 20' length requirement, or the applicant would need to apply for and obtain a Parking Modification from the Development Services Director if the stalls are to be less than 20 feet in length. I have att,;.ched a copy of the modification procedures for reference. The proposal meets the 24-foot minimum drive aisle width requirement for parking areas with two- way travel and 90 degree parking stalls. Please see the Landscaping section above for further parking lot landscaping requirements. Screening: Screening must be provided for all surface-mounted and rooftop utility and mechanical equipment. These areas should be shown on the site plan that is submitted for review. The drawings submitted for building permit review will need to include elevations and details on the proposed methods of screening, if applicable. Refuse and Recyclables: Recyclables and refuse deposit areas must be screened pursuant to RMC section 4-4-090C7. Recyclable and refuse areas must be provided at the following ratios: Retail -5 square feet per 1,000 square feet of floor area for recyclables and IO square feet per 1,000 square feet of floor area for refuse. Office -2 square feet per 1,000 square feet of floor area for recyclables and 4 square feet per 1,000 square feet of floor area for refuse. The proposed project would require a total of 61 square feet of recycling deposit area and 141 square feet of refuse deposit area. These areas must be shown on the site plan submitted for review. When applying for building permits, elevations and details of these areas must be included in the submittal. Approval of the proposed locations of dumpster areas by Rainier Waste Management is recommended prior to the submittal for building permits. 05· 130 K&F Investments (CA, 4th Overlay, retail, office).doc\ • K & F Investments (AKA Le Devel-rment) Pre-Application !'v1ceting October 20, 2005 Page 5 of5 Signage: The site would be pemlitted one freestanding business sign (pole, monument/ground, projecting or roof) per street frontage, based on the length of the frontage. The sign shall not exceed an area greater than one and one-half square feet for each lineal foot of property frontage that is occupied by the business. In no case shall the sign exceed a total of 300 square feet (150 square feet per face). In addition to the permitted freestanding signs, wall signs with a copy area not exceeding 20% of the fayade to which it is applied are also permitted. A copy of the sign regulations are attached for reference. Permit Requirements: The construction of a commercial building with over 4,000 square feet of gross floor area, and parking facilities for over 20 cars requires Environmental (SEPA) Review. Administrative Site Plan Review will also be required. These reviews would be carried out concurrently in an estimated timeframe of 8 to l O weeks. Site plans are reviewed to assure compliance with plans, policies and regulations of the City of Renton. Elements analysed include but are not limited to site layout, building orientation and design, pedestrian and vehicular environment, landscaping, natural features of the site, screening and buffering and parking facilities. In addition to the required land use permits, separate building, .J;\I'sk],Afm and sign permits would be required. The review of these permits may occur concurrently with the review of the land use permits, but cannot be issued prior to the completion of any required land use appeal periods. Fees: The application fee for joint Land Use Permit applications is full price for the most expensive pennit, in this case Site Plan Review at $1,000, and half the price of any subsequent permits, in this case half of the $1,000 full fee for Environmental Review of a project valued at over $100,000, for a total review cost of$1,500. In addition to the applicable land use, building and construction permit fees, the following mitigation fees would be required prior to building permit issuance: • A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. • A fire mitigation fee based on $0.52 per square foot of new commercial space. • A Water System Development Charge (SDC) of $0.213 per square foot of gross site area. • East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District fee of $0.069 per square foot of property plus interest. • A Sanitary Sewer System Development Charge (SDC) of $0.126 per square foot of gross site area. • A Surface Water Development Charge (SDC) of $0.249 per square foot of new jni.pe~us surface. , . • -, >'Ci' c. ,y,.-1--·· , : :-,\ , 1--u Please see also the comments om the Fire·Preveniion plans reviewer and Public Works plans reviewer for a breakdown of the fees. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees ins also attached for reference. In advance of submitting the full application package, applicants are strongly encouraged to bring in one copy of each application item for a pre-screening to the customer service counter to help ensurr that the application is complete prior to making all copies. cc: Jennifer Henning 05~130 K&F Investments (CA, 4th Overlay, retail, office).doc\ CV "' ! ___ Q) --, -:> ··-·-·~--~ ~~1-··-~:~ ----k !-----~ : ... , ... 0 --~---::::.l : LL.; R-Bi 'N:EJ T IUCP) ' p,,;j z <l) -,--- ~ <l) 0 k ~ 0 ::::.l ) ' th St. ~ ZONING -0 RM-F CA ~ = TBCIINICAL SDVICBI RM-F i CA R-8 , NE 9th Ct. ;7 R-8 !NE 8th :Ct: ';' •-.. ' . CA' FS • 16 T23N R5E E 1/2 j 2i0 1~00 CA :--· c::: __ -:R-1'-A ·----!tJ.:·· --·-' 1·· ·-···--··' ,_ ....... , ~---·-,--·-·· I L.. ...... . CA •oo E5 9 T23N R5E E 1/2 5309 Wu Architecture 8817 NE 116th Place Kirkland, WA 98034-6113 (425) 503-2182 FAX (425) 823-7888 PROJECT NARATIVE PROJECT NAME: PROJECT SIZE: LE DEVELOPMENT 16,050 sq. ft. Date: LOCATION: NE 41 " Street and Queen Avenue NE, Renton, Washington LAND USE PERMITS REQUIRED: Environmental Review+ Building Permit ZONING DESIGNATION OF SITE: CA-Commercial Arterial CURRENT USE: vacant, wooded lot, no improvements SOIL TYPE: glacial till (see Geotechnical Report) PROPOSED USE: Retail, Office, Accessory/Incidental Storage ACCESS: NE 4th Street, via unopened Queen Avenue NE OFF SITE IMPROVEMENTS: Sidewalks, curbs and gutter per City Standards TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $850,000 ESTIMATED FAIR MARKET VALUE: $1,250,000 (including land) ESTIMATED EXCAVATION (EXPORT): 1,000 cu. yd. of native soils TREES REMOVED: see Site Plan & Survey LAND DEDICATION: may be required to dedicate land for public street (unopened Queen Avenue NE) along the west property line. CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION DATES: begin: June 2006, end December 2006 CONSTRUCTION PERIOD: weekdays from 6:30 AM to 5:00 PM PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION ROUTES: routes to be determined and approved by City of Renton; access via NE 41" Street CONTROL MEASURES: erosion control measures will be implemented per City standards; dust control measure during dry weather PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN: will prepare and implement traffic control plan during excavation and hauling; traffic control plan to be reviewed and approved by City of Renton Dept. of Public Works page I Date: 1 February 2006 Mr. Neil Watts, Director Development Services Division City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Renton City Hall, 6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Ref: LE DEVELOPMENT -REQUEST FOR PARKING MODIFICATIONS NE 4th Street & Queen Avenue NE, Renton, WA 98056 Mr. Watts: lEVELop "f"", MENTp .. • r OF F LANNJN "-Nror,1 G FEB 1 ~ 2006 f:?fCEiVED We hereby request to modify the City of Renton Parking Standards for the referenced project as follows: 1. Parking Stall Dimensions: Change full size stall depth from 20'-0" to 18'-0". The reasons for this request is that we are constrained by site configuration and landscape requirements. 2. Ratio of Compact Stalls: Change maximum allowed quantity of Compact Stalls from 30% to 40% of total parking quantity for the referenced project Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information. Thanks. cc: K & F Investments DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLl T City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: FFJENToN ING FEB 1 ~ 2006 RECEIVED The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer. or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. N :\MSOFFICE\Wi nword\Personal\RENTONenvchlst[ 1]. docO 1126/06 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Le Development 2. Name of applicant: K & F Investments LLC 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 8817 NE 1161" Place, Kirkland, WA98034 Contact person: Paul Wu, AIAphone: 425-503-2182 4. Date checklist prepared: 1/28/2006 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Development Services Division 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction start: Summer 2006 Complete construction: Fall 2006 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Tenant improvements to follow in 2007. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Do not know. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Do not know. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Renton Building Permit. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. Construct a 16,350 sq. ft. 2-story retail/office building, including 48 surface parking stalls, utilities, site and off-site improvements. See attached Site Plan and Elevations. N:\MSOFFI CE\ Winword\Persona!\RENTONenvchlst[ 1]. doc 2 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project. including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. See attached Legal Description, Vicinity Map and Site Plan. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one~olling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other . c.'.Y' b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 5% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Glacial till. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No fill required. Excavation for Lower Level and drainage retention vault. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion may occur during excavation, grading and earthwork; erosion control measures will be installed prior to earthwork. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approx. 80% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Sedimentary and erosion control measures will be utilized during site improvements and building construction. N:\MS0FFICE\Winword\Personal\RENT0Nenvchlst[1].doc 3 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e .• dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Exhaust from construction equipment and vehicles during construction; Vehicular emissions from cars after the project is completed and operational. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Do not know. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None required. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. N.A. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N.A. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. N :\MSOFFI CE\ Winword\Persona I\RENTONenvchlst[ 1 J. doc 4 b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn. or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. Storm water will be collected, retained and discharged into City storm drainage system per code. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Do not know. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Storm water collection and retention system will be incorporated in the development project per City of Renton standards. 4. PLANTS a. b. Chec;k or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ___Y'.'.. deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _.L evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs ~ grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Trees and vegetation within the development boundary will be removed and replace as shown on proposed Landscape Plan. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Do not know. N :\MSOF F IC E\Winword\Personal\RENTONenvchlst[ 1]. doc 5 d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Indigenous and native plants will be used to meet City of Renton landscape requirements. See proposed Landscape Plan. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle~ther Cilft:Ubt..-: Mammals: deer, bear, elk~h~r _________ _ Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other _____ _ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Do not know. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain Do not know. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity will be used to meet project energy needs, including lighting, refrigeration, HVAC, appliances, equipment and data processing. Natural gas will be used for heating and cooking. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Project will utilize energy efficient HVAC and lighting systems. Building envelope will exceed Washington State Energy Code. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Do not know. N:\MSOFFICE\ Winword\Personal\RENTONenvchlstf 1]. doc 6 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire and medical emergency services may be required to protect property and occupants of the completed project. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term: higher levels of noise generated by construction equipment and vehicles. Long term: traffic and HVAC equipment noise generated by the business operations on the property. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is currently vacant; adjacent properties to the east and south are commercial, to the north is multi-family and to the west is a trailer park. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Do not know. c. Describe any structures on the site. Vacant, no structures on site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? None required. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Commercial Arterial -CA. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial Corridor (CC) Comprehension Plan land use designation. N :\MSOF FICE\ Winword\Persona!\RENTONenvchlst[ 1]. doc 7 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N.A. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Do not know. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approx. 30 employees. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None required. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed uses are compatible with the CC Comprehensive Plan. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None required. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. The tallest height of proposed structure is 28 feet, the proposed principle exterior materials are stucco, glass and painted metal. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Do not know. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N:\MSOF F ICE\ Wlnword\Personal\RE NTONenvchlst[ 1 J. doc 8 The building will be designed to enhance the streetscape with modulation, fenestration and storefronts; delivery and service areas will be routed behind the building; rooftop HVAC units will be screened; landscaping will be utilized to improve and enhance the appearance of the streetscape. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Parking and building security lights from dust to dawn. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Do not know. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Do not know. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Light spillage (if any) will be minimized and controlled with property lighting design. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Do not know. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Do not know. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Do not know. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. N:\MSOFFICE\Winword\Personal\RENTONenvchlst[1].doc 9 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site fronts NE 4'" Street and unopened Queen Avenue NE. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The site is served by Metro Bus service; bus stop on property street frontage. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 48 surface parking stalls will be provided in the completed project; none eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Do not know. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Completed project may result in increased need for health care, fire and police protection. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Automatic fire sprinkler system will be utilized to reduce the need for fire protection. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. N :\MSOFFI CE\W inword\Personal\RENTO Nenvchlst[ 1 J. doc 10 b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity -Puget Sound Energy Natural Gas -Puget Sound Energy Telephone -Verizon NW Cable TV -Comcast Sewer/Water -City of Renton Refuse -City of Renton C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full d1scl~n m()art Proponent: ~~---- Name Printed: /tAOC \.>JU,, A--!A Date: N:\MSOFFI CE\Winword\Personal\RE NTONenvchlst[ 1 J. doc 11 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These,shEi!lts shoyld only· be,used for actions,involving> de<;isi!ltns/011 poUci!ll>, plans. and ro rams. 'Yi:iu t:16 ndt need to fill out these sheets for ro·ect actions: : ·,)foi >;,fol> ,i;li,',,t, Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: N :\MSOF F ICE\ Winword\Personal\RENTONenvchlst[ 1]. doc 12 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Date: ENVCHLST DOC REVISED 6/98 N:\MS0FFICE\Winword\Personal\RENT0Nenvchlst[1] doc 13 :I I, SAM REED, Secretary of Seate of the State of Washington and custodian of its seal, hereby issue chis CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION to K & F INVESTMENT, LLC A Washington Limited Liability Company. An application was filed for record in this office on the date indicated below UBI Number: 602 282 '722 Dace: March 26, 2003 Given Linder my hand and the Seal of the State of hashington at Olympia, the State Capital Secretary of State •IM1Jfia~,f , I i !. I I 11 I i' I Ii I I! • P~ase PRINT or n'PE in black ink FILED • Sign, date and return origbal AND 0$E.CJlel'.ttft:Y OF ST ATE CORPORATIONS DlViSION 2 6 20~] APPLICATION TO FORM A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (P11r C,,ap/9r 25.15 RGw,I FEE: $175 E;XPE!DITEU (2-4-MOUR) tle"RVIGlil AVAIi.ABLE -$20 PER EHTITY INCi.UDE l'l!!E AND WRITI! "'£XPe-O(TE" IN BOLD LETTERS ON OtJTSIDl OF ENVELOP£ FCR OFACI:: VS( ON/." 801 CAPITOL WAY SOUTH • PO BOX MM U' OLYMPIA, WA 98504-0234 <sTATE OF WASHl~IGTC'N .:_ U' °" _,.o d _ , I SI_ED ,------,rU-B-1 --:-,-Ao _______ ,.,cr-,,_--1-;;-.;~, I • BE SURE TO INCLUDE FILING FEC. Checks ~ 1 C0RPORATION NUMBER: should be made payable to ·secretary of Stat~( 1 ----------_________________ -.J lmpQrtantt Persor lo corrlact ab::,i.it this fiii"'g Dayti:ne Pr1one Nu.'flber (with a(~a code) CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION (MtJSI contain /he W()rd "!.1,<iired Liabi:ity Company" "f...imiled Li.:Jbi/:Yy Co.• "LL C ;or "LLC") Street Mdress (,~equ;r,d) I Q'Z 0,x CDt;'.11,Ell. AVE$ S,~Eft~JI~LE_-----S<ate :lti.ft_ ZIP qg I z g PO Bo:.i-(OpliO(;ai -Must be in sart'MI cil'; as st.reet ad<lress) ------------ZlP fff different ml)fl :street ZIP) EFFECTIVE DATE OF LLC (SpecifiW effective d.fllG mi'.i)' 0$ up to 90 day:; AFTER rewipt ofth.5 documefl/ t,y the Secretary of State) D Specmc Date:~por filing by the Secre!a,y of State DATE OF DISSOLUTION (If appli!;able} ~ ~,,-A-N_A_c_,-,,-E_N_T_O_F_L_L_C_I_S_\_'E_S_T_E_O_IN_O_N_E_O_R_M_O_R_E_M_A_N_A_G_E_R_S ____ _, '------------------------'--~e__s ____ D ·~------------------' :>>> PLEASE ATTACH ANY OTt-lER PROVISIONS THE LLC ELECTS TO INCLUDE <« NAME AND AODRESS OF WASt-:INGTOt~ STATE REG!STE:R:EO AGE~,i Name--LAJ.CJ,z,.,..)(..___,l..,fc.__~~~--~~-~~--~~~~--~~--~~- Sta:e 11.&'! ZIP q fl, i 7 <g. PO Box (Optional -MusJ be in .xime ~ir.1 ;1s street addressJ -----ZIP (If different than S!lfff ZIP)------- NAMES ADDRESSES OF EACH F>ERSON EXECUTING THIS CERTIFICATE (ff necessa Prinlecl Name _,_A_,_/..,i;:;Mce"--+)(~--~la,E-· ----------S s;r,a1ure ~---,4',:'_~.'.,,;,,;"'-''1..__'c~('._--==C::::=::-· Mdrm to (.Q.:J Co!U.£1 I AvE $ Pr.inled Name _____________ _ Address----, City __________ State·---ZIP ______ _ Printed N,l'lm't---------------______ Signmure --------------------- Al5dress -----------------,----C,(y -----------State __ ZIP------- INFORMATION ANO ASSISTANCE -360/753-7115 (TDD -360/753-1485) ' 0 ' 0 f ' ' ' ' u • ' 0 ' ' ' ' 0 ' 0 f ' ' ' E u ' ' 0 " ; ' 0 " 0 ' • ' ' ' u • E ' " ' ' OM--tl01 ('i(IO) POLI~. OF TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS, PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., a Washington corporation, herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A, sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of: 1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested other than as stated therein; 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the title; 3. Unmarketability of the title; 4. lack of a right of access to and from the land. The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in defense of the title, as insured, but only to the extent provided in the Conditions and Stipulations. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Pacific Northwest Title Insurance Company, Inc. has caused this policy to be signed and sealed by its duly authorized officers as of the Date of Policy shown in Schedule A. __A(__ PACIF1C NORTHWEST TITLE Insurance Company, Inc. ~gnedby Authorized Signat PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITI.e Seattle. Washington City, State EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited lo building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (I) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location 01 any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area ol the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Dale of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company. not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writmg to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date ol Policy; or (e) resultmg in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 1 0-1093. 2 ?1'J3::: _...... .,.) ALTA OWNER'S POLICY -10-17-92 Standard Coverage PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. A.L.T.A. OWNER'S POLICY Order No., 581794 Policy Date, July 29, 2005 at 16,17 p.m. 1. Name of Insured: SCHEDULE A Policy No., 1093-228035 Amount, $590,000.00 Premium: $1,685.00 K & F INVESTMENT, LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company 2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this Policy is: FEE SIMPLE 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at date of Policy vested in: K & F INVESTMENT, LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company 4. The land referred to in this Policy is described as follows: The south 180 feet of the west half of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; EXCEPT County Road; AND EXCEPT east 165 feet of the south 130 feet of said west half of southwest quarter of southeast quarter of southeast quarter. Standard Coverage PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. A.L.T.A. OWNER'S POLICY SCHEDULE B Policy No.: 1093-228035 This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public record. 3. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey or inspection of the premises. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records, or liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. 5. Any title or rights asserted by anyone including but not limited to persons corporations, governments or other entities, to tide lands, or lands comprising the shores or bottoms of navigable rivers, lakes, bays, ocean or sound, or lands beyond the line of the harbor lines as established or changed by the United States Government. 6. {a} Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 7. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. 8. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, capacity, or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. 9. Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights 1 including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: As on Schedule B, attached. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: SCHEDULE B Page 2 Policy No.: 1093-228035 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: Defense Plant Corporation, a corporation Electric power transmission lines The description contained therein is not sufficient to determine its exact location within the property herein described June 1, 1944 3391113 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, a California corporation Aerial wires, cables and fixtures The description contained therein is not sufficient to determine its exact location within the property herein described June 5, 1946 3575612 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: Puget Sound Power & Light Company The right to install, maintain, replace, remove and use an electric line The centerline of said electric line to be located as now staked and constructed across said premises or as may be relocated by mutual consent (continued) RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: SCHEDULE B Page 3 March 7, 1961 5259008 Policy No.: 1093-228035 4. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED, RECORDING NUMBER: Olympic Pipe Line Corp., a Delaware corporation Pipeline for the transportation of oil and gas As to be constructed over, across and through said premises and other property March 25, 1961 5715151 5. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING, GRANTEE: H. Lee Heath and Norma L. Heath, his wife; and James W. Mccann and Thelma Mccann, his wife, each marital community acquiring an undivided one-half interest PURPOSE, AREA AFFECTED, RECORDED, RECORDING NUMBER, Ingress and egress Easterly 30 feet October 16, 1972 7210160337 6. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4612 ESTABLISHING AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF, RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: June 21, 1996 9606210966 7. Easement for utility and road purpose over and across the West 15 feet of subject property as created by instrument recorded under recording number 7309250365. 8. An inspection on April 1, 2005 disclosed the following: Landscaping appurtenant to the northerly adjoiner encroaches 6 feet, more or less, onto subject property. (continued) SCHEDULE B Page 4 Policy No.: 1093-228035 9. DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE AN INDEBTEDNESS: GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: MM/jxb K & F Investment, LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company Pacific Northwest Title Company of Washington, Inc. Pacifica Bank $383,500.00 July 27, 2005 July 29, 2005 20050729004425 END OF SCHEDULE B PTN. SE~ OF SE~ ... 0 0 3.03 AC 9178 w z oi > <( .c -<D N ~ ~ • N ' ' I 330 +/-~t:,"0 ~1~ .... "'.------,4...-I I S 33128 5 g 11231 6 62.!SO " m "? • I "f ';° 0. -o-~ 0 PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE Order No. Company of Washington, Inc, SEC. 9-23-5 ' I ' I ' ' I 1 ·· iffe I I 2SO 37500• 11W 250 330,97 --------- 116.5 " "' "? ~ •"' ' -.. "'v • ,;.,j"'>,;;:, In V -.!,- 0 "' 581794 IMPORTANT: This is not a Plat of Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. N :JTY OF RENTON 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING •'.'ITV OF Rl::NTON Printed: 02-14-2006 Payment Made: Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA06-014 Receipt Number: FEB 1 4 2006 RECEIVED R0600771 Total Payment: 02/14/2006 04:13 PM 1,500.00 Payee: K & F Investment LLC Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description 5010 000. 345. Bl. 00. 0007 Environmental Review 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check 1271 1,500.00 Account Balances Amount 500.00 1,000.00 Trans Account Code Description Balance Due --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000. 345. 81. 00. 0007 Environmental Review 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use or Fence Review 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) 5954 604.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 . 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00