Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA-06-017_Report 10 . ~ z " 0 0 0 z s ' SHEET NO. 1 ·--- 2 ---- ' - ' -g to . 15 16 . 21 -- 22 · 38 --- PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation I N DE X PLAN REFERENCE TI TLE NO. 11 INDEX Vt VICINI TY MAP / P~oject Location Tl VICINITY MAP / Existing Conditions SP 1 . 6 SITE PREP SHEETS (61 GR l . 6 GRADING SHEETS !61 P I -6 PLANTING SHEETS (61 D I -l 7 OETAI L SHEETS (171 ------- -----·---- SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN: REFERENCE#: 200500415 IN, Streams and Wetlands APPLICANT, WSDOT NEAR/AT: Renton HORIZONTALDATUM: PROJECT COUNTY: King STATE, WA VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO ea Key Map and Vicinity Map DATE: 01/20/06 SHEET 11 OF 38 I/ ~· I .. ~· . · .. ·· .. I --------~· w g· 2',_VICIN iYMAP '~ @I ~ \ \, ___ -\ \ I I ( 1 I 1 PROJEC; LOCATION _J ,,------1.' B A I C .. I I I I I -1. i ® \ .· •. \ KEY_MAP NTS ' i PROJECT LOCATION z 0 0 u 0 z "e-....l.:s___jl.J __ .__ ___ l_ __ ~ __ l_l_ __________ .]_ _____ ~---------1 l PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN: t° REFERENCE #: ~ 200500415 IN: Stceams and Wetlands :S NEAR/AT: Renton APPLICANT: WSDOT HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT ~ COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO 88 ~ Key Map and Vicinity Map DATE: 01/20/06 SHEET V1 OF 38 L._ _____________ _J__;__:._ __ .__.____J_ ____________ _,__==--'-'--"'--'"'----' LONG: -122°14'10" LAT: 47°27'29" SUBJECT SI TE: SPRINGBROOK UNIT LONG: -122°14'24" LAT: 47°27'19" ST 0 0::: LONG: -122°13'26" LAT: 47°27'28" >- W _J _J <C > Lu SUBJECT SITE: SPRINGBROOK UNIT A SUBJECT SITE: SPRINGBROOK UNIT C ~ f,=======S~W'ft.: f;;: -.:3::..:il.'....!T_.:::H:...._l-+--:::._S__'._T ___ _J 0 6 "- ~ LONG: -122°14'08" LAT: 47°26'49" LONG: -122°14'27" LAT: 47°26'29" V) '.:L <C 0 v, SW 41ST (S 180TH i w +, VICINITY MAP 0 z ,-~ _J ST * THE 100 IS ONLY ST) cJ?----- Legend /fTI ff'/ Exlsti ng C '-'ii Wetlands Flood plain I ' = '1--~--------------~-"''------'----'------~---------------'---L-~--L..--------I ~ PURPOSE: \1\/etland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK REFERENCE#: PROPOSED/RETAIN: 200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands APPLICANT: WSOOT NEARJAT: Renton HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT ~ COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAVD88 l~----------------~-K-•y_M_•_P_•_nd_v_rc_rn_rty_M_•_P~_o_A_T_E_:_0_1_12_0_,0_6 _________ ~---'--S~H_E_E_T_T_1~0_F_3_8_~ I .• i Nj~ fu ~ r-- ' ~ 1- § w ~-• w . ~ J: ~-. < ti)~-~ f·' ~ w~ .ll z. '-... ~ ...J !-· • J:," ' (J, -' I-. ~ <( i -- } :E ! I ~ I " , " " 8 i " ~ OHWM ... ALL WORK WILL BE WITHIN THE HIGH VISIBILITY FENCE SW 27ff ST l-·~ .. ·-_:-~,:;_ ~;;_2 :'.tt¥'i?r& -· -·-·u· N'. .: r··· I: . ·: . :A: :"_ .: ----"· : / "-: -<· -' f sn s t < H ' ) ~ ~ "r :fy : \+ t; +' + + f ¥ t I, + + + 'I l I [; ';,jl; ~ 1H. o :1 = .J d l; I I m ;; ~<~1m~1s ': ~ f }~.: ... ·: ·. · ... ·j I \ . . .. . l I . . . ! ·1 --!i , -. 1 . , 'I Legend L~ :-:;,wetlands · ~ Ditch o Storm Inlet @ Storm Manhole OHWM Line •··•--•--•·· ... Low Flow Chan. Storm Sewer Line Cut Line Fill Line Low Impact Silt Fence High Visibility Fence Property Line ~ Blackberry Removal ~ Select Blackberry Removal ~ Clearing and Grubbing [III] Reed Canary Grass Removal 'CJ1 Construction Entrance and Tire Wash, See Detail Sheet D17 Note: Not all Map Legend Elements are on each Sheet KEYMAP , ,_ ~ B ! A . ._! i _,,,; .... c, ---,:,~;:'-'. ,._, . ..,J)f.) ~ •-~ • ..... j ·--· ·sW'30THST1Row1····r.>• /IE; ~ i"'~.] ji l,K..:._ -.:_,_-, :~ ~ .. · .. iTO.Ell VACAllDI.: ·-:/ : rnld~ ... I ; ';:cs I; , ' ~ -~~---~-. --... --------~l~J~: 8 I , ·., -H ~ I -~-- ~ PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN: +N o 100 200 b REFERENCE #: w E Feet ~ 2 00500415 IN, Stceams and Wetlands ~ APPLICANT: WSDOT NCOEAURN/TYA ~: RK~nton STATE· H~RIZONTA.L DA.TUM: PROJECT ~ · Ing · WA VERTICAL DA TUM: NAVO 66 g Permit Drawings Slte A & 8 DATE: 01/20/06 SHEET SP1 OF 38 ALL WORK WILL BE WITHIN THE HIGH v:srBILITY FENCE w ~ ";;c~---T'--m-..,.._..,..___ - w '~7Z4,EJJi.t?a-~-= ---~-~~-~~ f r,;{'-Cc: ~-:,-,-=cc :---~----;: 1 ! 1 sl - LJ :N·: ~r: T--·-' ~ -. .... ..,_ ~ -.. . B· j I I I --I -~ er] -.: I Legend ;:--: ,7'Wetlands --· ---.;;,, Ditch o Storm Inlet © Storm Manhole OHWM Line .................... Low Flow Chan. Storm Sewer Line Cut Line Fill Line Low Impact Silt Fence High Visibility Fence Property Line ~ Blackberry Removal ~ Select Blackberry Removal ~ Clearing and Grubbing [III] Reed Canary Grass Removal Note: Construction Entrance and Tire Wash, See Detail Sheet 017 Not all Map Legend Elements are on each Sheet. KEYMAP ' I B A C C ;: r " ~' i " • " < i ~ i l § ' ! f ~ 0-• 0- "- "' z OJ ,; £ + + ALL WORK WILL BE WJTH]NI THE HIGH VISIBILITY FENCE L L-_,,-+++++++ + + " I +. + + + + + + + + + UNIT '+ + + + '+ C Legend ;= :-;,wetlands · · ~ Ditch ~ Stonn Inlet @ Storm Manhole OHVv'M Line .................. Low Flow Chan. Storm Sewer Line Cut Line Fill Line Low Impact Silt Fence High Visibility Fence Property Line I+ + ~ i Blackberry Removal [2223 Select Blackberry Removal ~ Clearing and Grubbing [III) Reed Canary Grass Removal Note: Construction Entrance and Tire Wash, See Detail Sheet 017 Not all Map Legend Elements are on each Sheet KEYMAP ' , B A I i J ~ .! ; . t~f' 11------------.-------.----_____:_----+J7_B,Ll==t=1-==-::,,=lr ~~,: PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation 2 s 0 ::Q~N 5 E;QE~ 0 ~ 4 ~~ 1 : Ks PROPOSED/RETAIN: .--Ls _ ,° IN: Streams and Wetlands ~-- NEAR/AT: Renton APPLICANT: WSDOT HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT Q ~ COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAVD88 0 ~----------------~-P_e_nn_lt_D_ra_w_in_g_s_S_IT_E_c_~D_A_T_E_:_0_1_12_0_106 __________ ~-~S~H~E~E~T~SP~3~0~F~3~8-~ '" '" ,~, ALL WORK WlLL BE WITHIN THE HIGH VISIBILITY FENCE UNIT C •. •. "· .. ,..,, ~. ~ :< "' w :::, z w > <! w _; <! 0 "' ,c <! 0 Legend L _ · · / Wetlands ----Ditch o Storm Inlet @ Storm Manhole OHWM Line • • ·--• • Low Flow Chan. Storm Sewer Line Cut Line -•1u.-"" Fill Line Low Impact Silt Fence High Visibility Fence Property Line ~ Blackberry Removal ~ Select Blackbeny Removal ffi2 Clearing and Grubbing ~ Reed Canary Grass Removal Note: Construction Entrance and Tire Wash, See Detail Sheet 017 Not all Map Legend Elements are on each Sheet. KEYMAP h--=- ' • B A i~_Jl__ _______ ~-----~--------_j=f=Br======:'::j ~ PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN: +" a'•••100c==5'oo b 0 ·-REFERENCE#: w e Feei ~ 2 00500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands , APPLICANT: WSDOT NEAR/AT: Renton HORIZONTALDATUM: PROJECT ~ COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO ss 5 Pennit Drawings SITE C DATE: 01/20/06 SHEET SP4 OF 38 -~----------------~---------~--------------~--==~-=~~-~ Legend L: --:;,-wetlands · · ~ Ditch o Storm Inlet @ Storm Manhole OHWM Line ... -.............. Low Flow Chan. SW 40TH ST Storm Sewer Line Cut Line 8 < • < ~' § & • • " < , ' ' • l ~ 1 I f • • • s 0 f- 1---l z =i ALL WORK WILL BE WITHIN THE H[GH VISIBILITY FENCE EXISTING WETLAND 1¥t[TJGAT10N SITE I I I I I I I I I I I r \ ~ l I: ~\ ,. l ,f, \,/' ·-~ \ J '-~~) ,-', I;: J p i I 1·, ! I ' I * i ! / °g. EXISTING STORM \ ~ <::.,*° Fill Line Low Impact Silt Fence High Visibility Fence Property Line ~ Blackberry Removal ~ Select Blackberry Removal ~ Clearing and Grubbing [IIu Reed Canary Grass Removal Note: Construction Entrance and Tire Wash, See Detai I Sheet D 17 Construction Entrance and Tire Wash, See Note 1 Detail Sheet D17 Not all Map Legend Elements are on each Sheet KEYMAP ' ' B A .; WATER PONO I I r:,_;~4;, ; '",, ·~! _ _,;1-'~,'"'L"'"°_"'_",c: __ ,"'_~ I I , _'81 _J_i ~ ~-------------===-===:;::==±==-==-==---=c;=======;t;,~2!1..~413_!:R:_!:D~S;_:Tr_tLW=:'.".'.L========·--::!-·=:j I I ~ PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN: w+' ,' Q o REFERENCE#: 0 200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands , :-::: APPLICANT: WSDOT NEAR/AT: Renton HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT ~ COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAVD86 S L_ ________________ _j__P_e_rm_it_D_r_a_w_in_:gc_s_S_IT_E_D__Jc_DA_TE_:_01_12_0_10_6 _________ ___J_ _ _:Se,HecEe,E=.Tc_::S.:_Pc_5_,0,,F--"38e__ _ _J "' ; • ~ ~· ALL WORK WILL BE WITHIN THE HIGH VISIBILITY FENCE LJ NIT E OHWM SW 39TH ST. Legend [_~ :::-;;,wetlands · · · ___,. Ditch o Stam, Inlet <> Stam, Manhole OHWM Line •··•·· ···• Low Flow Chan. Storm Sewer Line Cut Line Fill Line Low Impact Silt Fence High Visibility Fence Property Line E::;::::+J Blackberry Removal ~ Select Blackberry Removal ~ Clearing and Grubbing LL<1J Reed Canary Grass Removal Construction Entrance and Ti re Wash, See Detail Sheet D 17 Note: Not all Map Legend Elements are on each Sheet. KEYMAP I , B A § r--~--~---~ i r SW 40TH ST ~.P--+-__ __c_J .. ~ 0 :1-P-U_R_P_O~S-E-, -We-t-la_n_d_M_lt-iga-ti-.o-n------,--S-P_R_I_N_G_B_R_O_O_K __ ,-PR_O_P_O_S_E_D_IR_E_T_A_IN-,------~+w+-c,'c--.,;;;:;;,~00;;;;;;20-lo REFERENCE#: Feet 0 200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands ~ APPLICANT·. WSOOT NEAR/AT: Renton s HORIZONTA,L DA,TUM: PROJECT ~o COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 88 "~---------------~-P_e_nn_l_t_Dra_w_ln_g_s_S_IT_E_E_~D_A_T_E_:_01_12_0_1o_B ________ ~~-S~H~E~E~T_S~P~6~0~F~38~-~ ~ g a a 0 a z ---- :---. SEE SHEET Dl FOR TYPICAL BREACH SECTION !UNITS A & Bl SW 27TH ST 8' W[[)f ELEVATED •BOAR~WALK : SEE -SHEET 02 FOR '"TYPICAL SECTION) > .,: Legend £ ~ J Wetlands .. ~ Ditch o Storm Inlet © Storm Manhole OHWM Line Property Line •·• •-•-• Low Flow Chan. Storm Sewer Line Cut Line Fill Line ... 1.-Proposed Contou ~ . ...-, -s,-sr Proposed Storm Line Note: Not all Map Legend Elements are on each Sheet. KEYMAP • /-'- . . ' I S' ~rP-U~R~P-O_S_E_:_W-etl_a_n_d_M-it-ig-ati_o_n------~--S-P_R_I_N_G_B_R_O_O_K_~_P_R_O_P_O_S_E_D_I_R_E_TA-IN-,----~---+-+-,~-,-~-,-00---,00----< ~ REFERENCE#: w Elll .... ,.~c,====:::5 ~ 200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands , ---, ----· -~-. :s:: NEARJAT: Renton ~ APPLICANT: WSDOT COUNTY: King STATE: WA ~~~~~Lo~:~: N::J:acT & ~----------------~P_•_nn_1t_o_,._w_1_n_gs_s_ite_A_&_e~_D_A_T_E_:_0_1_12_0_10_6 _________ ~-~S~H~E~E~T~G_R_1 ~O~F_38 __ ~ :1 ' (J '""' ,. _/ / -t:c- --.. ·/•. ,~. [ :_EXlSl!NQ --.. , c •. ·( ,__WETLAND. _ 'I -. -.. ---MHIGATION.· --·-. : --S [·TE •· I J .-• .... - ~/ ( ~ ·1 .(.· .• ; -~··.·. ~.· -"\'(-"' I ·.· ·-· .. - I .. \ ····\ . -1 ., .... a:: C) 1-w w ::c U) w z ::::; ::c -(J I- <( ::!! --I l: ---- Legend L~ J Wetlands ---~ 0 @ ST-ST Note: Ditch Storm Inlet Storm Manhole OHV\/M Line Property Line Low Flow Chan. Stam, Sewer Line Cut Line Fill Line Proposed Contou Proposed Storm Line Not all Map Legend Elements are on each Sheet KEYMAP 2 , B A ~ L i-~-----~---,;:------. _._. -----·· Is i~-----~---~----_l__--1:=L:=t==±:===~ f PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSEDIRETAIN: +' il'•••"'c::o==='oo 0~ REFERENCE#: w E Feet , 200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands , s: NEAR/AT: Renton APPLJCANT: WSDOT HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT g COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAVD88 "'------------------'----P_e_nn_it_D_ra_w_i_n_g_,_s_1T_E_B _ _,___D_A_T_E_:_0_1_12_0_10_6 _________ ~-~S~H~E~E~T~G=R2~0~F~3~8-~ UN IT C Legend / / Wetlands · · · ~ Ditch o Storm Inlet @ Storm Manhole OHWM Line Property Line .................. Low Flow Chan. 1 ! Storm Sewer Line Cut Line Fill Line I: ! \i ; I -1-Proposed Contour '--:•--' s,-sr Proposed Stenn Line Note: Not all Map Legend Elements are on each Sheet. KEYMAP I , f . 4 I ! ~ ~[~,_l" ~ ' . ., .· zl ----------------r----------,----------_J----+·=~======· ===-1 "I-~ PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation S:=~~;E~~~~K PROPOSED/RETAIN: w+' .°•••:t:'::, ==5'°' § 200500415 IN: Stceams and Wetlands , :::: APPLICANT: WSDOT NEAR/AT: Renton HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT ~ COUNTY: King ST ATE: WA VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO 88 ~~---------------~-P_e_m1_1_,_0ra_w_in_g_,_s_1T_E_c_~o_A_T_E:_01_12_0_10_6 ________ ~ __ S~H~E~E~T_G_R_3_0~F~3_8_~ ~ g 6 u 0 UNIT C Legend /._~ _J Wetlands ··-~ 0 @ .................. ST-ST Note: Ditch Storm Inlet Storm Manhole OHWM Line Property Line Low Flow Chan . Stom, Sewer Line Cut Line Fill Line Proposed Contour Proposed Storm Line Not all Map Legend Elements are on each Sheet. KEYMAP ' z ~-::.:_...; __ , "f--~-------------.-----------,r----~---------t----:,-----------i ~ PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSEDIRETAIN: +' 'illl•llll'°c'==:5''° f5 REFERENCE#: w E F~t 0 200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands ~ NEAR/AT, Reatoa ' APPLICANT: WSDOT HORIZOITTAL DATIJM: PROJECT 8 COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO ss l Penn It Drawings SITE C DATE: 01/20/06 SHEET GR4 OF 38 ~--------------~-------~~------------~-~=~-~--~ NOTE: WATER FLOWS NORTH TO UNIT "c" VIA EXISTING DITCH 3' 0 "' "' "' Cc "' z OJ 0 f- 1-----i z ~ EXISTING WETLAND M]T]GATION SITE I I I I I I I I I I I I l, SW 40TH ST 7:., SEE SHEET D8 FOR DETAIL . < \ :. L : < /· X SEE SHEET 09 { \ FOR DRAINAGE C \ ! PROFILE I I ., ' I l I I \.j'-...._~ f .) II I "'.I .) SEE SHEET 07 _,,, ·;:I FOR DETAIL 7 EXISTING STORM~ . I "'"""+ Legend /~ ./ Wetlands ~- ···~ D @ ... _.,,_ ........ .. Ditch Storm Inlet Storm Manhole OHWM Line Property Line Low Flow Chan . Storm Sewer Line Cut Line Fill Line Proposed Contour s,-sr Proposed Storm Line Note: Not all Map Legend Elements are on each Sheet KEYMAP I WATER PONO [ ~'~ I c,+ (.; I , l ~ ~ ===·'' ,1 ---<+/1----/-----_j I ' I --, /: I i~,z.· i ""' ·s • L----------======_:::jt:_==-========b~..:'S!W_4'.:,;3~R'..':Dl__:'S_:.TJ::::r..======:::I I PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN: +" •' •••'°c'==::5'"" 0 ~ REFERENCE #; w E Feet " 200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands , :<.: NEAR/AT: Renton APPLICANT: WSDOT HORIZONTALDATIJM: PROJECT ,~o COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAVD88 ~, Penn it Drawings SITED DATE: 01/20/06 SHEET GR5 OF 38 ~----------------~---------~--------------~--==~=~~~-~ ~ . • ~I i :, • • < , " ' i ' e ~ f ,i' f ' " ~ /l ' : E SEE SHEET 011 FOR TYPICAL LCW FLOW SECTION (UNIT El (/---~~~~~~ Legend l · 7 Wetlands • ------:9-Ditch o Storm Inlet @ Storm Manhole ·------OHWM Line ----Property Line Low Flow Chan. Storm Sewer Line _,.,~"' Cut Line . .,._,,., Fill Line -,--Proposed Contou '--1,--' -sr~s1 Proposed Stenn Line Note: Not all Map Legend Elements are on each Sheet. KEYMAP ~ SW 39TH ST. ~ '/ _.,. ----------------1 < B i-i iv: 1::w?Y '§.~;;:........ SEE SHEET D12 FOR TYPICAL 1 ····~ .• E··· . • .. __ .-,'I ;,/ /. BREACH SECT10NS (UN[T El ~ ,_.,,., ,/ : ,;" ~--·--------~~--~--------~~-~-~~--[BJ j "~ i SL_ll ----------,-~:-:=:=-==-~S;W~4~0~TH~S~T~;:-----_tf=f~='~=-~·~~cc.J~·-~ +' ,, .... 1111,oo=:==:::5200 ' SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN: ~ PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation Feet F REFERENCE#: IN: Streams and Wetlands § 200500415 NEAR/AT: Reoton H~R<ZONTALO,TUM, eaoJECT =,:; APPLICANT: WSDOT COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO 88 'L _______________ _j_'P'.'."".'""~ii:_t~D'.:ra""w"'in~g~s_:;s~rT'.:E~E:_l.':D".:A~T.':.E.:_· ::_01.".,2:'.o'.'.:,oo'.'.'._ ________ _1_ __ S,eHe,Es,E°'T-'G"'R"'6'-0"'-F~3B~-~ ~ LJ N I T B UNIT 1/r- ____ 1 __ SW 27TH ST J- I - A ~ -. I 0 z _; Legend L_--, J Wetlands · · ~ Ditch ---0 @ Stream Storm Inlet Storm Manhole OHWM Line ................. Low Flow Chan. 0 Storm Sewer Line Vertical Snags See D16 Logs See D13 Hummock Planting See D15 Brush Pile See D14 fij1I1 111 9 Wetland Tree/ -Shrub#1 ~ Wetland Tree/ Shrub #2 ~ Wetland Tree/ -Shrub #3 BI3E Wetland F crest Unde(J)lanting EH:3 Upland Hab~at Plantings ~ Riparian Plantings ~ Emergent Plantings Note: Not all Map Legend Elements are on each Sheet KEYMAP ' ' B A SW 30TH ST <ROW! .• .·1.,1· · g ( IO BE VACATEDl .. ~: ~c,', --' i ~ J.!a."'!;0-..==J ______ ~ "f-~--~------------~---------~-----------~---+-~----------1 ~ PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN: +" ' 6 0 -REFERENCE#: w E 200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands r NEAR/AT1 Renton ' APPLICANT: WSDOT HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT ~ COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO 66 "" ,oo Ji ~----------------~P_e_nn_11_0_,._w1_n_gs_S_ite_A_&_B~_D_A_T_E_1_0_1_12_0_100 __________ ~-~S~H~E~E~T~P~1~D~F-~3~8-~ :< "' w ::, z w > SW 27TH ST :~11111 ~ f:' ----. ---.. _,:.:~-~--_..::. :----~--~ "' <! 0 ' . I ··~ ··~ :: :: I Legend [ ·· J Wetlands · · · -Ditch ~ ----Stream 0 @ Storm Inlet Storm Manhole OHWM Line •··-· .... Low Flow Chan. 0 Storm Sewer Line Vertical Snags See D16 ,/" Logs See D13 Hummock Planting See D15 0 "f Brush Pile See D14 ffr I 111 d Wetland Tree/ · Shrub #1 ~ Wetland Tree/ Shrub #2 ~ Wetland Tree/ Shrub #3 ~ Wetland Forest Underplanting ffiE Upland Habitat Plantings ~ Riparian Plantings ~ Emergent Plantings Note: Not all Map Legend Elements are on each Sheet. KEYMAP ' ' B A -u >,-' ' " , • -"' ~ "' z aJ 1/,.,. ~y JI i r _!.)'cl"':!' ·-J Tl r··1 '1111 Clr,l_U- y1y1 l I '(1 1'y- ' ,-'I a YJ y 'lYIYJ "':y. I y I., 'I 1 'I :1 ,.:" :;_ i ' ·-~ I ' ' I ' I ,_ I ' -, ' I I " ' I " I l ' L -,--' 'tl --1 ' I =- >< ' - ,"I--) T, ':l - I I I 1 I , t r • I r11 1 I I H l -~ T T T ' I I I I 'f I n'I T r'IT I I I X T ' 'y, I I I Legend ;= / Wetlands --c> Ditch Stream Storm Inlet Storm Manhole OHWM Line • ------· • Low Flow Chan, Storm Sewer Line Vertical Snags See 016 0 ~ Logs See 013 0 Hummock Planting See 015 + Brush Pile See 014 fiji I 11 11 9 Wetland Tree/ -Shrub #1 ~ Wetland Tree/ Shrub #2 ~ Wetland Tree/ Shrub #3 !51::3t1 Wetland Forest Underplanting ffiE Upland Habitat Plantings ~ Riparian Plantings ~ Emergent Plantings Note: Not all Map Legend Elements are on each Sheet KEYMAP ~ _, -· u,,., ' I ralld y--'-+- "-"----------------------------------~---+--"---'-----= ~0 __ : PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation $:~!:~E~~~~K PROPOSED/RETAIN: w---l_E 1o --·::c=::::j'oo 200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands T ~ NEAR/AT: Renton ' APPLICANT: WSDQT HORIZONTAL DATIJM: PROJECT ~o COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAVDBB •L_ ______________ _i___P_erm_it_Dra_w_in_,g:_s_S_IT_E_C_L_DA_T_E_:_0_11_20_106 ________ _J _ _,Se,:H,sEcSE-'-T-'P-'3'-"0,::,F_:3c,8c___, ~ ~ $ UNIT C . I I I, J, Legend /~ 7wet1ands -~ · · · ---,. Ditch Stream Storm Inlet Storm Manhole OHWM Line •··· ··•·• Low Flow Chan. 0 Storm Sewer Line Vertical Snags See 016 ~ Logs See 013 Hummock Planting See 015 Brush Pile See 014 fu' 11 11 ,q Wetland Tree/ -Shrub #1 ~ Wetland Tree/ Shrub #2 ~ Wetland Tree/ Shrub #3 1St:511 Wetland Forest Underplanting 8333 Upland Habitat Plantings Note: Riparian Plantings Emergent Plantings Not all Map Legend Elements are on each Sheet. KEYMAP ' B ' A 0 u 0 ~f--~------------~-------~~---_J_ ________ +_L__-_·L_' __ · =-=-=-=· =;=i ~ PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSEOfRETAIN: +' 0 ,oo ,oo b 0 -REFERENCE #: w E ~ 200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands , APPLICANT: WSDOT NEAR/AT: Renton HORIZONTALDATUM: PROJECT ~ COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAV066 ~~--------------~-P_e_nm_it_D_ra_w_i_ng_s_s_1T_E_c_,_oA_T_E_:_0_112_0_1o_s ________ _L_ _ _cSccH,cEc,,Ec.T_cPc_4c...=Occ_F_3:::8:____J ls' r ~' i " " • < , • ~ % r e § I § r ~ " § g " 0 0 I- 1-----i z: =:i EXJSTJNG WETLAND MITIGATION SITE EXISTING STORM WATER POND SW 40TH ST 3 0 cc cc cc "- V, z en I I I· L Legend L--=-/ Wetlands 0 0 + Ditch Stream Storm Inlet Stenn Manhole OHWM Line Low Flow Chan. Storm Sewer Line Vertical Snags See D16 Anchor Logs See D13 Hummock Planting See D15 Brush Pile See D14 fuW 1 1 ,y Wetland Tree/ Shrub #1 ~ Wetland Tree/ Shrub #2 ~ Wetland Tree/ -Shrub #3 ~ Wetland Forest Underplanting BlI] Upland Habitat Plantings Note: Riparian Plantings Emergent Plantings Not all Map Legend Elements are on each Sheet. KEYMAP ' • B u 0 z e ~-----------=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=--=.;:==::±===----=='-=;======~~_.1SJ!W~423.f!R!:!D_.1S.!_T__j::'.:'t'.:=========' ~ PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK ·s " O f:;" REFERENCE#: ~ 200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands > NEAR/AT: Renton ~ APPLICANT: WSDOT STATE·. '"'A HORIZONTALDATUM: PROJECT ~ COUNTY: King n, VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD BS PROPOSED/RETAIN: ,oo ·+,° 200 ,~, s ~~----------------~-P_enn_it_D_r_a_w_in_g_s_S_IT_E_D_~D_A_T_E_: _0_112_0_1_06 _________ ~--=-S~H=-EE=-T'--'P'-'5'-'0"F---'3"'8 _ ___, LJ N I T E Legend /. :· 7 Wetlands · · · ..... Ditch ~---Stream n Storm Inlet @ Storm Manhole OHWM Line • •·• • • Low Flow Chan. ··-----Storm Sewer Line 0 Vertical Snags See D16 ~ Anchor Logs See D13 0 Hummock Planting See D15 c!f Brush Pile See D14 fl I , 1 11 y Wetland Tree/ -Shrub #1 ~ Wetland Tree/ Shrub #2 ~ Wetland Tree/ Shrub #3 EE5l:l Wetland Forest Underplanting EB33 Upland Habitat Plantings ~ Riparian Plantings ~ Emergent Plantings Note: Not all Map Legend Elements are on each (---,\____·~------_____j SheekEYMAP ~----SW 39TH ST. ' fr;~~( I B A ~· .KJ .. ~ L _ _J __ ~=~:-----·~:-·===~----~ ----~~==-------=~·-=-~SW:__:4_c::O~TH::_:'S~T-~~==~~-·~___!:=t'::=l:==_,,/j:=i:-.=-==-=-::::::· .,.!::jl _ ~ ~ PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation " 0 i SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN: ,oo REFERENCE#: 200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands APPLICANT: WSDOT NEAR/AT: Renton B COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAVD88 200 ! Permit Drawings SITE E DATE: 01/20/06 SHEET P6 OF 38 L_ ____________ _J_ ____ .:c_ __ _t__ ___________ ~~=~==~-~ &' ~I i " C " < a • ~ • t ' ~ r t el ' • " z " 0 u u , THIS DETAIL CORRESPONDS TO SHEET GR1. illL _\.\! IL illL illL ~ illL ,ILL ~ ill.L illL A illL illL ~\]_/,, ill1L ill.L illL ,ll/L illL illL illL ~ ,llL EX. I B :r ,l'J, illL 0 I I illL ,ILL I I I 5: ~ ~ I :r 0 'JI I ill.L I ~I\ .J·Sl'.3~ ill.L //·~ -I ~ ' <...--',~ ./ --- ill.L ~ . cc; f 2---:=. ill.L ill.L t/ . ,'/ ill.L ill.L I ' I I I, ;:.· ill.L ill.L I :r 0 ill.L ill.L I B I // ~.~±. .,., ill.L UN I TS A AND B. TYP. WETLAND BOUNDARY~ \ /---L OHWM I I 0 ·t'· -"\I;/ ~ ',, ,,' k ill.L I I 0 f ill.L :r I :E ill.L I r L ill.L I A / ,i.lL __ =:_Jll :·Ei' I" . ill.L ~' t '~ lE I·.~.· . I ::, I . '{'' u .l..LL 0 :r :E i SPRINGBROOK CREEK I I . '~ ill.L I , 1.+/ s GROUND"""\ , -~~~~~~--"'--/----.r--'__,..,_......!L-..;... __ _,, NOTE1 BERM BREACHES ON UNITS A ANO B DO NOT EXTEND BELOW THE OHWM. VARIES TYPICAL SECTION A-A BREACH. UNITS A AND 8, TYP. SCALEt N.T.S. 20' -0._"--..i TYPICAL SECTION B-B BREACH, UNITS A ANO B, TYP. SCALE: N. T .S. / / / / COMPOST, SEE NOTE l ELEV 12' FINISH GRADE <BREACH BOTTOM! 25 F~, "f-----------------,----------.--------------,,----------1 ! PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN: 5 REFERENCE#: ~ 200500415 IN, Srreams and Wetlands APPLICANT: WSDOT NEAR/AT: Renton HORIZONTALDATUM: PROJECT ~ COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAvoss wL_ _______________ J_ ___ D_E_T_A_IL_1 ___ L_D_A_TE_,_0_1_12_0_106 _________ ..L._..:Se,H"Ec,E,.,T_D,e.1c_:Oe,Fc_,3::,8_-J • ,. " ~· 0 0 u u z THIS DET Al L CORRESPONDS TO SHEET GR1. I I c2i _•10 DECK I SCREWS CONNECT GEACH DECK BOARD~ 2x6 PLANK DECK[NG I, 1/4 •• MAX. GAP I BETWEEN DECK BOARDS 2x BLOCKING CTYP.l --tt---l'II-~ 3' -0" MlN, CLR. TYPICAL BENT 30 THROUGH BENT 161 SOURCE: BRAC[NG PRECAST SHALLOW FOOTJ NGS OATUM N.A.V.D. 88 i TRAIL 4' -0" TYP. TRA[L PROF[LE GRADE T/OECK[NG I A / ' / / / / / / 3' -0" I I 4' ·O" TYP. 16" MAX. SPACING BRACING 3' -0" SPRINGBROOK CREEK TRAIL CROSS SECTION • CITY OF RENTON'S FUTURE CONDJTION, EX(STING CONVEYANCE ANALYSIS FOR FLOODPLAIN MAPPING STUDY OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK, 2004. I ...g_ 100 YR FLOOD CFEMAJ EL. 20.6 I ..g_ I 100 YR FLOOD• EL. l1.7 I I TYP] CAL EDGE OF DECKING ....5l___. 10 YR FLOOD• -EL. 15.7 M--tt--2x PLASTIC WOOD JOIST. TYP. 2 YR FLOOD• EL. 1-4.5 2x PLASTIC GIRDER '>------------------------------------------------------' ~-PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK REFERENCE#: PROPOSED/RETAIN: 2005004 15 IN, Stceams and Wetlands NEAR/AT: Renton ~ APPLICANT: WSDOT COUNTY: King STATE: WA HORlZONTALDATUM: PROJECT ~ VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO 68 Oi ~----------------~---D_E_T_A_I_L_2 ___ ~_DA_TE_,_01_1_20_10_6 _________ ~--S~H~E~E~T~D~2~0~F~3cc8 _ ___, THIS10ETA1LicoRRESPONOS / TO SHEET GRJ. .....---/ --.... ---,.-,-- I " /A :I I ~ " ~ ~r----~---__:____:__ __ _:___:__ __ ; ------··--- ' e ~ r r. " ''"' f f--------------------------------------------------, § f t ~ " u u z JO 20 10 r EXlSTING GROUND ----" --I \ I I I PROPOT GRADE SECTION A-A CHANNEL. UNIT C SCALE: HOR [ ZONT AL l "= I oo' VERTICAL 1··=tO' JO 30 20 20 10 10 SECTION B-B CHANNEL, UN IT C SCALE; HORIZONTAL !"=loo· VERTICAL 1''=10' PROPOSED GRADE (EARTHEN DAMJ JO 20 10 " .,,f----------------~-------~-------------~------------1 B PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN, ~ REFERENCE#: ~ 200500415 IN, Stnaams and Wetlands APPLICANT: WSDOT NEAR/AT: Renton HORIZONTALDATUM: PROJECT ~o=> COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAVD88 ~~----------------~---D_E_T_A_IL_1 ___ ~D_A_T_E_,_0_1_12_0_10_6 _________ __,__-'S'-'H-"E'-'E'-'T'--'D"3'--"D"-F-"3"-8---' Scurce: \IVl>DOT; 2004, KING COUNTY; 2004 J__ Lut upde\&d: 1 57:15 PM 111812006 I chriss I PW.\Engineenng\010\drawings\Permrt!I\.JARPA\10peOOEl12c d4 dgri ~N ,, C ~ !') I a a. a: ~ "' • ~ 0 a "' -UQ;;:a"'tJ ~oq:i ~ 0 m >(Jlm Z .... ~o~ Gl > i= ·-oz CD :; -I>,.~ ~ .. g:;~~ 0 '101 --- cozz >om .. -IC> r.iz i!l~ a~> ;;i .... -· ;:' ~ ;::J;,;; :::0 Ill o -· ro 815 a~ oa. a~ In ;;! .... !') ~ " <o rn m" :J: ~ § mo~ ~ ~:,. o" ~ ~ ~ li2 0 .. :I: "T1 $; ~ ~ t:92 g:~ " d • a a. • " ,, ,, 0 ,, 0 In m >! ,, m .... > ~ THIS DETAIL CORRESPONDS TO SHEET GR4. Fee:. ("' DETAIL STOP LOG WEIR STRUCTURE SCALE1 I" = 2' ------/EXISTJNG -----L-GROUND ------ EL: l7.5' EL. l7.0' EL. I s.o· EL, 14 ,Q' NOTE1 3" STOP LOG I. SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR DETAIL ON PRE-CAST CONCRETE STRUCTURE. ...... _ .... SECTION A-A G" STOP LOG PROPOSED .GROUND i.!.:. lli '--._ '--._ '~~· ' r EXISTING _____ L GROUND ------ 2· -6" !l..Lh ... , I 17.o·r.1 . ~ ~ . ~ ; ·:1 1 : : • •• ~ I r PROPOSED ~ " • , , ' , , GROUND EL. 14.0' , · .. ~ -~~1·-: ~-~-·;-~-.. ~ ~;-' •."r":.L..,.-//" / . ' ' ' ' : . ·"«: / ~ ~ EL. 15.0' SECTION B-8 Source: WSDDT; 2004, KING COUNTY; 2004 I Last updated: 5 20.03 PM 111712006 l chnn THIS DETAIL CORRESPONDS TO SHEETS GR3 AND GR4 30 v>Z o« a. ~ 0~ 3" OF MULCH l PW:\Enginaering\01 Oldraw1rigs\Permits\JARPAI 10pe00e1 2c_d5.dgn 6" OF LOW PERMEABILITY SOIL ______ ..... 0 WO v>z o« a. ~ Or ocw -------E=· ~lo ff~ --~X~;T~N:-7------- GROUND~ 20 12" 3" l7 .a ELEV, 17.0 r w w " "' "' " r w w "' w z ~ " u r 10 ....... .., .. -; INCORPORATE A M[N[MUM OF 3" OF COMPOSTE MATERIAL INTO EXISTING SOIL INCORPORATE A MINIMUM OF 3" OF COMPOSTE MATERIAL INTO EXISTING SOIL 0 WO EXISTING GROUND PURPOSE: Roadway improvements r w w " "' "' " r 3" OF MULCH t::I LLL ..... v ~ "' w z ~ 6" :g ~ a. ~ Or o,w a. ,. ,_ 17.0 6" OF LOW PERMEABILITY SOIL, SEE NOTE 3 acl----~---~---~---~---~---~---~---~---+-u r .. " SECTION A-A GR4 UNIT C SCALEz HORJZONTAL 1"=100' VERT[CAL 1''=10' SPRINGBROOK REFERENCE#: 200500415 APPLICANT: WSDOT DETAIL 5 PROPOSED/RETAIN: IN: Streams and Wetlands NEAR/AT: Renton COUNTY: King STATE: WA DATE: 01/20/06 30 20 10 HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT VERTICAL DAT\JM: NAVO 88 SHEET D5 OF 38 THIS SHEET CORRESPONDS TO SHEET GR4 JO -~ JO -~ ' 0 WO ~z 0~ ~~ 0~ ocw ~~ -----20 _ ~------20 ~ ~ -;;;- -~---- ~--~:l:TIN GROUND -~ PROPOSED GRADE 10 10 I I I SECTION 8-B GR4 SCALE: HORJZONTAL I "=50' VERT I CAL l "=5. PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN: REFERENCE #: 200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands NEAR/AT: Renton APPLICANT: WSDOT COUNTY: King STATE: HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT WA VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO 88 DETAIL 6 DATE: 01/20/06 SHEET 06 OF 38 ~ !: z 0 0 u ~ THIS DETAIL CORRESPONDS TO SHEET GR5 2 I ·,.r·~·~·~·=·=·~·===--i·=~-·==·-~'r======-==~, ~1 I I ~ .. l I -11--- "t I ! EX, 12" CPEP~ ~: : ~. '--__ /EX, 12" CPEP /\ _____ 1..._..,i I II L __ '/-----·-~-:-~ : i~· ___ i{ _ _j ( -----I "' I . ----.-I \... _____ 1..._ j lt.'--___ _/ FROM DRAINAGE POND I I TO EXISTING STORM SYSTEM I I I 5, ~s" I 11----j------'-+'~--------11 · I I c,'--,--'----.-----.-----~---+.-----.----------_--.-~ ~ PLAN Ei' -8" EXIST(NG GROUND l =-":..·:....::2.:.6:..:.2:..'_ ,k:n:r-"'"t===============F==~,;"""T"7' EL. 26.2' -~«< : ·~~. -- FROM DRAINAGE POND EL, 22.6l' EL. 20.6' ~0* v»~ ~/ 0( ,0(-0(<, ' '»>~ '>'."' ... /' / ,~ / NON-SHRINK GROUT 0--- 1 I Y------ 1 '--A, -;::._,A~1--~ //~« ~;;y '> \, ;.. DETAIL SECTION STORMWATER DIVERSJON STRUCTURE SCALE1 1 "=2' SLIDE GATES GR5 NON-SHRJNK GROUT ------7\ TO EXISTING I I STORM SYSTEM -------'f---- 1 ,-;::._,--_/ ~v ,0 '1-----------------------------------------------------I ~ PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation ~ 0 ~ SPRINGBROOK REFERENCE#: PROPOSED/RETAIN: 200500415 IN: Streams and Weflands APPLICANT: WSDOT NEAR/AT: Renton HORIZONTALDATUM: PROJECT ; COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAVD66 0L_ _______________ _L_ ___ D_E_T_A_IL_7 ___ _j__D_A_TE_:_0_1_12_0_,os _________ _[_ _ _,s,,H,,Es,EccT---"D'--7---'0"'F::._,3ceB _ __J • ;: ~- 5 0 0 z • THIS DETAIL CORRESPONDS TO SHEET GR5 EL. 19.0' / PJPE OUTLET. UNIT 0 4' -Q" 12· -o" TYPICAL DITCH SECTION EXISTING GROUND FLARED ENO SECTION FOR 12" PIPE --- QUARRY SPALLS l!O' !APPROX.l DETAIL PJPE OUTLET, UNIT D SCALE1 N. T.S. GR5 EL. 19.37 <PIPE OUTLET> --'--,--s ',1/l··;: ' ' , t-----------------~---------~--------------~-------------i ~-PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN: i 2ooffoo41' 5 ~~A::;~~:~t~:"'tlands APPLICANT: WS00T HORlZONTALDATUM: PROJECT ~ COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALOA.TUM: NAV088 ~ ~----------------~---D_E_T_A_I_L_B ___ ~_D_A_T_E_: _0_112_0_1_00 _________ ~--S~H~E~E~T~D~B~O~F~3~8-~ Source: WSDOT; 2D04, KING COUNTY: 20()4 J Lest updatoo: 1 53:14 PM 111812000 I chriH PW:\Engineering\01 Oldrawings\Permits\JARPA\ 10pe00e12c_d9.dgn THIS DETAIL CORRESPONDS TO SHEET GR5, I I I I I I I I I I 21 I I I I I <· 40 f-- 1 30 i f ... I I 20 10 ·o z .. ~ ~ w " ; I " z ;: ~ x w .. - '" '- ' w' ~, ~ ~, g1~ f:1J VliN ZIii ~i. ~,~ a::;_.1.IJ. w, > " o;a:: ,- I -7---------- -r--+ --__ 1 I I I cl I I -~----~--~-----~ L) I I I I I ii c. I I I I I I ~1;;; I 1. I I :1 ,1,0 I 1· ____ I_ I N' ZIN I I ---! -----t·· -I I , w- llll11 I I o.1Ll'l :1. I I I I ~I~ :rlci l ,,I-I z:~ ~12 I I I ----I----l ---;:,i! n -- ~1Q'.: L' --EXISTING GROUt,iD , 1 I ~ __ ,_:, I I ,---l LI.I I I I , QiLoJ z ------I I I I 1-'2 -1--:::.. -...c.. ---! <C .... :E I I I ·U <r----u--- 1 I I i-_, o.•o• , , ~ 1_ J_ I 0.40S :~ I ----C--s .0.40% 1 N I ;; I I I N I • • I I -·,-r-;;:;I;;:; i i I !---l _ __ I I I.,'. I _;_;-T ---_I 300 , .1 • r ~:~ I ' 300' -1-<':1~ g1~ ·------·--L---· I "' ~,~ ~,~ 214' 12 IN. 12 IN. 12 IN. o.4or~ I I ~ .. " ' . L 'Z I N I -I 'z I " ' ;: u I w I ~ " z w I " w I ~ .. ~ ~-~ ~ I -~ I !~ I - I EXISTING 10" SANITARY SEWER EL. l2.65' I I I 40 I i l -r---l----1--__ : ____ : ____ l ____ r I I I I I __ I __ ----J _____ I_ ----1----L I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I : ; : 1' JQ_ I ' I I I I I I I I , I I I 5'0 I ---------___ 1 ____ 1 ____ 1 ____ 1 1:~6?~0 --~:_:--:----!--i 11 _ io :_ ,--I 0.50% ---HOR:IZONTAl 6 I I VER:T (CAL 0 I I 5 I I I I I ----------f-- 1 ' ' . --i --r-----, ,------------ I -~ I 1·· I SCAlEs I I HORIZONT.AL J_t'.=.100.'. VERTICAL 1"=10' 1 21"' u... 12 IN. I I I I I I I I I I I I . I I I I I --I ,pa I I 110 PURPOSE: Roadway improvements SPRINGBROOK REFERENCE #: PROPOSED/RETAIN: 200500415 APPLICANT: WSDOT DETAIL 9 IN: Streams and Wetlands NEAR/AT: Renton COUNTY: King STATE: WA DATE: 01/20/06 HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO 88 SHEET D9 OF 37 Source: WSDOT; 2004, KING COUNTY; 2004 l LBS! updatad: 5'20:53 PM 1/17/20CJEI THIS DETAIL CORRESPONDS TO SHEET GR6 30 20 0 WO "'z o« a_ ~ 0~ ocw l chriH I PW:\Enginaoring\01 O\draw1ng!IP11rmrtsUARPA\ 10p800e1 2c d1 a.dgn C:lo "'z o« a_ ~ 0~ " w a_ " a_ " -------------:.~ 0~ -.:,~:----~;b;~~ :;;;------------------ 12" 3" ' ' \ \ \ \ \ \ I }O 0 1o_J -.........:= _J / Uo FINISHED GRADE___, INCORPORATE A MIN(MUM OF Ji" OF COMPOSTE MATERIAL INTO EXISTING SOIL 0 0 PURPOSE: Roadway improvements SECTION B-B GR6 UNIT E SCALE1 HOR[ZONTAL 1"=100' VERTICAL l"=tO' SPRINGBROOK REFERENCE#: 200500415 APPLICANT: WSDOT DETAIL 10 PROPOSED/RETAIN: IN: Streams and Wetlands NEAR/AT: Renton COUNTY: King STATE: WA DATE: 01/20106 HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO 88 SHEET D10 OF 38 THIS DETAIL CORRESPONDS T0SHEETGR6 ~ / EX. GROUND .; £ ~ z 0 8 0 z ________________ a ____________ L __ _ IL_ 3 DETAIL f __JI J2L 3 LOW FLOW CHANNEL, UNITE SCALE2 N, T.S, GRG FINISH GRADE CWETLANO) "1-------------------,-----------.----------------.------------1 ~ PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN: " 0 0 REFERENCE#: ~ 200500415 IN, Streams and Wetlands NEAR/AT: Renton HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT ~ APPLICANT: WSDOT COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAVUS8 ~ ~-----------------~----D_E_T_A_I_L_1_1 ___ ~_D_A_T_E_,_0_1_12_0_106 ___________ ~--S~H~E~E~T~D~1~1~0~F~3~8--~ ~ ~- ~ 0 u 0 z ;THIS DETAIL "CORRESPONDS io SHEET GR6 LOW FLOW CHANNEL BREACH -UNITE, TYP. ~ L EX. GROUND :~~/-------~ --------------------------- cE~LE~V~a~·-----~-~/--------~------------~------- TYPICAL SECTION A-A BREACH -UNITE, TYP. SCALE1 N.T.S. FINISH GRADE ! BREACH BDTTOt.4l TYPICAL SECTION B-B BREACH -UNITE, TYP. SCALEz N.T.S. GR6 GR6 F !NISH GRADE <BREACH BOTTOMJ ::::::...J 1 3 ELEV B' ROCK LINED TOE OF SLOPE 20 Foot "1------------------~---------~--------------~------------I ~-PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN: b REFERENCE#: i 200500415 INt Streams and Wetlands APPLICANT: WSDOT NEAR/AT: Renton HORIZONTALOATUM: PROJECT ~o COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO 88 •c_ ________________ ___L ___ o_E_T_A_IL_1_2 ___ ___Lo_A_T_E_,_01_,_20_10_6 _________ _._ _ _;S:cH.!tEC!EC.:Tc..eD_:_12=---.,0e_F-"3"-8 _ __, ~ f z 0 8 0 z THIS DETAIL CORRESPONDS TO P SHEETS LEGEND PLAN VIEW DETAIL EARTH ANCHOR AND CABLE ITYP.1 18" DIAM. MIN. 10'-15' MIN. LONG TRUNK WITH 4' DIAM, ROOT WAD ANCHORED LOG WITH ROOT WAD CABLE WRAPPING StTE (El ONLY SCALE1 N.T,S, PLAN VIEW DETAIL 18" DIAM. MIN, I0'-15' MIN, LONG TRUNK WITH 4' O[AM, ROOT WAD LOG WITH ROOT WAD CABLE WRAPPING SITE CA,8,C! ONLY SCALE1 N.T.S, 't-------------------.-----------.----------------,--------------1 ' PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSEO/RETAtN: i 20050041: 5 ~~At~~~~=~t~;:""tlands APPLICANT: WSOOT HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT ~ DETAIL13 COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAVDBB -~----------------~---------~D_A_T_E_:_01_r2_0_106 __________ ~--S=H~E=E=T~D~13~0~F~3=8-~ THIS OET AIL CORRESPONDS TO P SHEETS LEGEND PLAN MIN. BASE DIAMETER OF 6 IN. MIN LENGTH OF 5 FT. F[NISHED GRADE SECTION ~ t z " C u 0 z DETAIL BRUSH PILE SCALEi N.T.S. NOTE1 BRUSH PILES TO BE CONSTRUCTED UT[LIZING TREES CLEARED FROM SITE "f-----------------.------------.------------------,-------------1 ~ PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN: C b-REFERENCE#: ~ 200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands :s: APPLICANT: WSDOT NEAR/AT: Renton HORIZONTALDATUM: PROJECT t COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAV088 ~L_ ________________ _,._ ___ o_E_T_A_IL_1_• ___ _,.__o_A_TE_:_0_112_0_1_00 _________ -1 __ S,cH:..:E,c:E,,_T,._,D:..:1;;;4..:0"F---"3"-8-__J ~ ~- 0 u ~ THIS DETAIL CORRESPONDS TOP SHEETS LEGEND DOUBLE LAYER HEAVY CARDBOARD---/-----11"-H-tTI PLANT HUMMOCK WITH SPECIFIED PALETTE PEAT BASED SOIL DOUBLE LAYER HEAVY CARDBOARD m PLAN ;:;t-, ----=-=. =--",~~==~rt,\",,Siii°f""--------===:S~T~A:;,=;=,=:.~l~T~H:-:~,~o::"':o:;s':'1;,.:-~.!~1~1 c="'l1 r:11 f-~ :' '.;:-l;::;:;JJ,:_11, ;~ DOGWOOD o 3 O.C. -,,.=:Jll- -m.__~~~~~U ELEVATION DETAIL HUMMOCK PLANTING SCALEs N. T .S. ",------------------,-----------,------------------,-----------~ ' PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation s 0 ~ SPRINGBROOK REFERENCE#: PROPOSED/RETAIN: 200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands APPLICANT: WSDOT NEAR/AT: Renton HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT @ 0 " COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAVDS8 <c..._ ________________ _,_ ___ D_E_T_A_IL_1_s ___ _,_D_A_T_E_:_01_12_0_1oo __________ _J_ _ _:S,::H.:,E:c,E"T'--"D"-15"-"0"-F-3:e,8'----' ~ z 0 0 0 0 z a ' THIS DETAIL CORRESPONDS TOP SHEETS LEGEND \111' 1 I rn)1 :1111 /II i1 I 1: I~ ' , ll 1 1j I ' llli i i111 11 ~ 1111 i Ill Ii I :, 0 n ,~~~Y,1111 \,~~,_'-' //~illi ~~y ?;;v ~ /'< '~ i » 11\'1 '/' 0 / ::1111, - 1111t ac 0 n ' - I DETAIL VERT I CAL SNAG DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. NOTE: SNAC:S SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM SITE AS PRACTICABLE PURPOSE: vVetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN: REFERENCE#: 200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands NEAR/AT: Renton APPLICANT: WSDOT COUNTY: King STATE: DETAIL 16 DATE: 01/20/06 WA HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT VERTICALOATUM: NAVO 88 SHEET 016 OF 38 Source: WSDOT; 2004, KING COUNTY, 2004 I Last updated: J·J0:49 PM 1/1912000 I chriss. PW.\Engineering\O 1 O\drawings\Pemirts\jARPA\ 1Ope00e12c_d17 .dgn THIS CETAIL CORRESPONCS TOP SHEETS LEGEND 6" COMPACTED DEPTH ASPHALT TREATED BASE fATBI GEOTEXTILE 6" COMPACTED DEPTH CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE !CSBCJ CULVERT AS TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS -SECTION A-A 120' MIN, CULVERT AS REOUIRED-~~~~-r-----i 211 CTYP,) ~" TO 8" OUARRY SPALL--...... ±2 '--' 5; l '''" A ( "--/0 , .... __ .,>,( ......._/ 0,,-<'-.._ / Or~ 1"-------"-(')l..._/ \ 01 ,,. -V (\'-..___ r ./Q.,--~1 · 0 L"' ~_/ (~ vr-~/'\'v 9, '-~""' ro'O:i.!w-U/'\0 ~ ~ (~ '---:--{ )r,iJ 9' 1 · z I ,--'--. _) l ) r', I --~ / ~ 1 / / ; I -~ , ) ( I ~ \ / • . ' '"-) r·p ,-,"---_/ v; ) ( ._) ;F,0 n _ _, ',0 ,'--; \ ) n0 ,';----"-) ( )I.._ ,I -/ ,-'-.___/(, ',:' __ L) QO'--A to)" r-0 n( V 0~/ '---'"O <)_ 0 /' ,0 j \ () C) V VU 01 1 I \ 0( r-1- 0o o 001£b ~r -~ I~~ O;:::r~)?o o"" r 38" x-.. _ " " -N " ~ _jA MINIMUM BERM HEIGHT TO BE 6'_/' GREATER THAN PRE-LINED SUMP 25' DISCHARGE TO SAN [ TARY SEWER DR HOLDING TANK PROPOSED 25' RADIUS HEIGHT OF PAO PURPOSE: Roadway improvements 70' MIN, DETAIL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS DETAIL SCALE1 N. T .S. SPRINGBROOK REFERENCE#: 200500415 APPLICANT: WSDOT CETAIL 17 NOTEt PLAN I, THE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCT[ON ENTRANCE AND TIRE WASH FOR UNIT D SHALL NOT EXCEED THE LIMITS OF THE EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVEWAY, PROPOSED/RETAIN: JN: Streams and Wetlands ~·:AR/AT: Renton COUNTY: King DATE: 01/20/06 STATE: WA HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO 88 SHEET 017 OF 38 o"~;Y ~~ d >+-. ""' . ~ -~ Kathy Keolkcr, Mayor ~N'1'0 Chuck Wagman Zelman Renton LLC 14900 Interurban Ave. So. Suite 210 Tukwila, WA 98168 June 5,2006 Office of the City Attorney Lawrence J. Warren Senior Assistant City Attorneys Mark Barber Zanetta L. Fontes Assistant City Attorneys Ann S. Nielsen Garmon Newsom II Shawn E. Arthur Re: Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Release of Easement RECEIVED JUN O 6 2006 CITY OF RENTON Dear Mr. Wagman: UTILITY SYSl tMS You and I have spoken on this matter several times. After I indicated that the City would not be able to fully release your bond, but would be able to release a portion of the bond and change that bond to a letter of credit or set aside letter, you were going to check with your bonding company and respond to me. I subsequently have tried to reach you by telephone on at least two occasions. I presume that you have been on vacation or otherwise occupied. If the City's proposal to lessen the bond amount and change the bond to a letter oferedit or set aside letter is not acceptable, then the City proposes to pay you a$1,000 for the necessary staff and legal time to process the release of this easement. From the information that I have, the easement is no longer an active easement and should have little direct value to your company. The property in question is on the very edge of the proposed Wetlands Mitigation Bank and has value to the City primarily as buffer. If we cannot conclude an arrangement for the City to acquire the necessary release of easement, then I would like you to so indicate so that I can terminate my efforts on this acquisition. While the City would like to acquire release of this easement, the land is not valuable enough to the City to continue to expend staff time and attorney time to acquir<J it if this process is going to unnecessarily drag on. The courtesy of an early response would be appreciated. LJW:tmj TI0.45:28 re: .,~ennao, PE Jay Covington -?::9Zv~ ~~nee J. Warren City Attorney -P-o-st_O_ffi_ce_B_o_x_6_26---R-e-nt_o_n.-W-as-hi-.n-gt_o_n_9_8_0_57---(-42_5_) _25-5--8-67_8_/_F_A_X_(4_2_5_) 2-5-5--5-47_4_ ~ AHEAD-OF THE CURVE I AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: CITY OF RENTON PACIFIC NU TIT EAS 1055 S th G d W PAGE001 OF 030 ou ra Y ay 1010s1200& 09:23 Renton, WA 98055 KING COUNTY, UA Attn: Surface Water Utility Engineering Supervisor EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED Kin · Records Division -Deputy .._je1< irJ..:::id-is~ GRANT DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT Grantor: City of Renton Grantee: Cascade Land Conservancy ~(s, Legal Description Ptn ofW 1/2 of Section 30, T23N, R5E, W.M. and Ptn of Section 25, T23N, R4E, W.M. and Ptn of NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 36, T23N, R4E. W.M., all in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. Additional legal description: at Exhibit A. Assessor's Tax Parcel Nwnbers: I) 125381-0090-05 (Unit A); 2) 252304-9004 (Unit B); 3) Ptn of252304-9019 (Unit C); 4) Ptn of 362304-9002-06 (Unit D); and 4)125381-0240-04 (Unit E) 3-/d- ~s,_~NT DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT ("Easement") is made as of the --- day of//Z{J5/f(/l; 2006 by City of Renton, a mumc1pal corporat10n ("Grantor"), m favor of Cascade Land Conservancy, a Washington nonprofit corporation ("Grantee") (collectively "Parties"). 1. RECITALS 1.1. Grantor is the sole owner in fee simple of that certain real property (the "Protected Property") in King County, Washington, more particularly described in Exhibit A (legal description) and shown on Exhibit B (site plan), which are attached and incorporated into this Easement by this reference. 1.2. The Protected Property (Springbrook Creek Bank) possesses wetlands and other fish and wildlife habitat ("Conservation Values"). Wetlands and other fish and wildlife habitat Springbrook Conservation Easement October 3, 2006 on the Protected Property that are restored, enhanced, or otherwise created after the effective date of this Easement shall also be considered Conservation Values. 1.3. The Conservation Values are a result of the Protected Property's inherent ecological potential and of the existing and/or anticipated restoration and enhancement of wetlands and other habitats on the Protected Property by Washington State Department of Transportation ("WSDOT") and the City of Renton (collectively"Sponsors"). The foregoing restoration and enhancement is intended to qualify the Protected Property for inclusion by WSDOT and the City of Renton in a wetland mitigation bank and issuance of credits there from ("Mitigation Bank"). Additional restoration and enhancement of the Protected Property may occur as identified and described in that certain Memorandum of Agreement and Mitigation Banking Instrument for the Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank, as may be amended from time to time (collectively "Banking Agreements"), approved by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ("Banking Agencies"), in consultation with other certain public agencies (collectively, "Bank Oversight Committee"). 1.4. The Springbrook Creek Mitigation Bank was established by WSDOT and the City of Renton in coordination with, and approved by, the Banking Agencies. This Easement is a condition of the operation of the Mitigation Bank. Grantee acknowledges that from time-to-time Grantor may increase the real property that is subject to this Easement in furtherance of the Mitigation Bank. Grantor and Grantee may amend this Easement to accomplish the foregoing as provided in Section 12.1 below. 1.5. Grantor and Grantee intend that the Conservation Values be preserved and maintained in perpetuity by permitting only those land uses on the Protected Property that do not impair or interfere with the Conservation Values, which include, but are not limited to, such restoration, enhancement, and recreational uses as further provided in this Easement. 1.6. Grantee is a publicly supported, tax-exempt nonprofit organization, qualified under Sections 50!(c)(3) and 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and also qualified as a nonprofit nature conservancy corporation under RCW 64.04.130 and RCW 84.34.250, whose primary purpose is to promote the preservation of open space and critically important ecological systems in Snohomish, King, Pierce, and Kittitas Counties in Washington State. 1. 7. Grantee agrees, by accepting this Easement, to preserve and protect in perpetuity the Conservation Values and enforce the provisions hereof unless this Easement is sooner extinguished or terminated as otherwise provided for herein. 1.8. The Parties acknowledge that this Easement does not provide standards or criteria regarding the effectiveness of the Sponsors' restoration or enhancement of the Protected Property and that this Easement is not intended to provide a basis for ensuring the effectiveness of such restoration and enhancement or to obligate Grantee to ensure such effectiveness. The Parties further acknowledge that such standards and criteria and the ability to ensure the effectiveness thereof are provided for in the Banking Agreements and related documents. Springbrook Conservation Easement 2 October 3, 2006 2. CONVEYANCE AND CONSIDERATION 2.1. For the reasons stated above, and in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms, conditions, and restrictions contained in this Easement, and other good and valuable consideration provided by the Parties, Grantor hereby voluntarily grants, conveys, and quit claims to Grantee a conservation easement in perpetuity over the Protected Property, consisting of certain rights in the Protected Property, as set forth in this Easement, subject only to the restrictions contained in this Easement. 2.2. This conveyance is a conveyance of an interest in real property under the provisions ofRCW 64.04.130 and RCW 84.34.210. 2.3. This grant shall be subject to easements, restrictions, interests, and water rights of record as of the effective date of this Easement, including, but not limited to, those set forth in Exhibit C, which is attached and incorporated into this Easement by this reference. 2.4. Grantor expressly intends that this Easement run with the land and that this Easement shall be binding upon Grantor's successors and assigns. 2.5. This Easement does not transfer any water or water rights. This Easement also does not transfer, or create any entitlement in, any credit from, or rights in the credits from, the Mitigation Bank. 3. PURPOSE The purpose of this Easement is to assure that the Protected Property will be retained forever in its condition as wetland and other aquatic and riparian habitat of fish, wildlife, and plants, providing the wetland, aquatic and riparian functions and values described in the Baseline Documentation, and to prevent any use of, or activity on, the Protected Property that will impair or interfere with the Conservation Values (the "'Purpose"). Grantor intends that this Easement will confine the use of, or activity on, the Protected Property to such uses and activities that are consistent with this Purpose. This Easement shall not be construed as affording to the general public physical access to any portion of the Protected Property. 4. RIGHTS CONVEYED TO GRANTEE To accomplish the Purpose of this Easement, the following rights are conveyed to Grantee by this Easement: 4.1. Identification and Protection. To identify, preserve and protect in perpetuity, unless sooner extinguished or terminated as otherwise provided under this Easement, and to restore or enhance by mutual agreement, the Conservation Values. 4.2. Access. 4.2.1. To enter the Protected Property annually, at a mutually agreeable time and Springbrook Conservation Easement 3 October 3, 2006 upon prior written notice to Grantor, for the purpose of making a general inspection to monitor compliance with this Easement. 4.2.2. To enter the Protected Property at such other times as are necessary if Grantee reasonably believes that a violation of the Easement is occurring or has occurred, for the purpose of mitigating or terminating the violation and otherwise enforcing the provisions of this Easement. Such entry shall be upon prior reasonable notice to Grantor, and Grantee shall not in any case unreasonably interfere with Grantor's use of the Protected Property. 4.2.3. To enter the Protected Property, at mutually agreeable times and upon prior written notice to Grantor, to exercise any other affirmative rights as expressly provided for herein. 4.3. Scientific/Educational Use. To allow persons or groups to enter the Protected Property for educational, scientific, and biological purposes to observe and study on the Protected Property; provided that any such persons or groups first are approved by Grantor, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed, or conditioned, make prior arrangements with Grantor, agree to provide Grantor with copies of any data or reports resulting from such observation or study, and agree to abide by any reasonable restrictions on access set forth by Grantor. Grantor and Grantee agree that all persons or groups given permission to enter the Protected Property shall sign a waiver, substantially in the form attached to this Easement as Exhibit D, which is incorporated herein by this reference. This waiver is intended to release Grantor, Grantee and Assignee from all liability to the extent allowed by law. 4.4. Injunction and Restoration. To enjoin any use of, or activity on, the Protected Property that is inconsistent with the Purpose of this Easement, and to undertake the restoration of such areas or features of the Protected Property as may be damaged by uses or activities inconsistent with the provisions of this Easement, all in accordance with Section 9. 4.5. Enforcement. To enforce the terms of this Easement, consistent with Section 9. 4.6. Assignment. To assign, convey, or otherwise transfer Grantee's interest in the Protected Property in accordance with Section 13 and subject to Section 11.4. 4.7. Baseline Documentation. 4.7.1. Within sixty (60) days after the effective date of this Easement, within sixty days (60) after the recording of any amendment hereof under Section 12.1 below and thereafter as provided in Section 4. 7.2 below, Grantee shall document specifically the Conservation Values in an inventory ofrelevant features of the Protected Property, which Grantee shall maintain on file at its offices and which shall be incorporated into this Easement by this reference ("Baseline Documentation"). The Baseline Documentation shall consist of reports, maps, photographs, and other documentation that provide, collectively, an accurate representation of the Protected Property. The Baseline Documentation is intended to serve as an objective, although nonexclusive, information baseline for monitoring compliance with the terms and conditions of this Easement. Springbrook Conservation Easement 4 October 3, 2006 4. 7.2. As previously noted, the additional restoration and enhancement work under the Banking Agreements that may occur on the Protected Property is likely to enhance significantly the Conservation Values. Grantee may from time-to-time and as necessary update the Baseline Documentation to reflect such work and to document the enhanced Conservation Values resulting there from for purposes of monitoring compliance with the terms and conditions of this Easement. 4.8. Maintenance of Protected Property. To control non-native, noxious weeds and invasive weeds (collectively "Weeds"), the exercise of which shall be in Grantee's sole discretion, and acknowledging that Grantor is required to comply with all applicable state and local laws for controlling weeds on the Protected Property (see Section 5. JI .1, below). Grantee shall provide Grantor 10 days prior written notice of its intent to exercise this right to control Weeds on the Protected Property. 5. GRANTOR'S RESERVED RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS 5.1. General. Grantor reserves for itself and its successors and assigns all rights accruing from ownership of the Protected Property, including, but not limited to, the right to sell, lease, and devise the Protected Property and the right to engage in, or permit or invite others to engage in, any use of, or activity on, the Protected Property that is not inconsistent with the Purpose of the Easement and that is not prohibited by this Easement. Without limiting the generality of this Section 5.1, Grantor specifically reserves for itself and its successors and assigns, the following uses and activities: 5.2. Recreation. The undertaking of recreational activities on a non commercial basis, such as hiking, bird watching and the public's use of the pedestrian trail provided for in Section 5.5 below, provided that such activities are conducted in a manner and intensity that does not cause more than a de minimis adverse impact on the Conservation Values. 5.3. Fences. The construction and maintenance of fences within or around the Protected Property. 5.4. Habitat Stewardship, Restoration, and Enhancement. Constructing, installing, planting, maintaining, and engaging in other activities to maintain or further restore or enhance the Conservation Values in accordance with the Banking Agreements and any final design, construction or management plans and bid specifications subsequently developed in conformance with the Banking Agreements, as may be amended from time to time, ("Mitigation Bank Plans and Specifications"), which may include, but are not limited to: planting and irrigating plants; removing and controlling weeds; maintaining berms, log weir in Unit C, and water conveyance structure in Unit D; and creating new wetlands. Grantor shall provide Grantee Mitigation Bank Plans and Specifications relating to: any proposed use of herbicides for Weed control; grading and excavation plans; the alteration or manipulation of natural water courses; or the creation of new wetlands, water impoundments, channels or water courses and shall provide Grantee with prior written notice of any material deviation from such Plans and Specifications relating to such activities. Motorized and mechanized vehicles may be used in furtherance of, Springbrook Conservation Easement 5 October 3, 2006 and to facilitate, the foregoing activities, provided that any off-road use thereof does not cause more than a de minimis adverse impact on the Conservation Values. IfGrantor has conveyed or assigned its rights to engage in the activities described in this Section 5.4 to Grantee or third parties, Grantor covenants to not interfere with such restoration and/or enhancement, including, but not limited to, by the exercise of any rights reserved to Grantor under this Easement. 5.5. Pedestrian Trail. Construction and maintenance of an elevated public pedestrian trail generally eight feet in its width, constructed of plastic wood, cedar timber, and/or other nontoxic materials, and located in Unit A at the approximate location shown on Exhibit B, provided that the trail design and construction shall be in accordance with the Mitigation Bank Plans and Specifications. 5.6. Maintenance. Taking various actions necessary to protect the Conservation Values and other features of the Protected Property from beavers and to otherwise mitigate for the impacts of beavers on the Protected Property, including, but not limited to, trapping beavers, removing trees, installing devices to interfere with activities of beavers, and removing and otherwise destroying beaver dams and lodges. 5. 7. Signs. The installation and maintenance of signs provided that such installation does not cause more than a de minimis adverse impact on the Conservation Values. Signs in excess of twenty-five (25) square feet in area need prior written approval by Grantee of sign location and design. 5.8. Scientific/Educational Use. To allow persons or groups to enter the Protected Property for educational, scientific, and biological purposes to observe and study on the Protected Property. Grantor and Grantee agree that, with the exception of the general public's use of the pedestrian trail provided for in Section 5.5 above, all persons or groups given permission to enter the Protected Property shall sign a waiver, substantially in the form attached to this Easement as Exhibit D, which is incorporated herein by this reference. This waiver is intended to release Grantor, Grantee and Assignee from all liability to the extent allowed by law. 5.9. Protection of Health or Safety. The undertaking of other activities necessary to protect health or safety, or that are actively required by and subject to compulsion of any govermnental agency with authority to require such activity; provided that any such activity shall be conducted so that significant adverse impacts on the Conservation Values are avoided, or, if avoidance is not possible, minimized to the greatest extent possible under the circumstances. 5.10 Utilities Infrastructure. Routine maintenance, improvement, operation, removal, repair or replacement of existing City of Renton and King County utilities currently occupying those areas that are designated as "Reserved for City of Renton Utilities Infrastructure" and as "King County Sewer Easement" on Sheets 12 through 19 inclusive of the City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LUA-06-095-LLA, recorded under King County recording No. 20060824900007, copies of which are attached to Exhibit C to this Easement. Springbrook Conservation Easement 6 October 3, 2006 5.11 Grantor's Obligations. 5.11.1. Noxious Weed Control. Grantor shall comply with all state and local requirements for controlling noxious weeds within the Protected Property. 5.11.2. Structures, Facilities and hnprovements. Grantor shall maintain all structures, facilities and improvements associated with the foregoing activities, including roads, trails and fences, that are within the Protected Property and are merely incidental to the functionality of the mitigation site, but that are necessary to Mitigation Bank management activities, for as long as necessary to serve the needs of the Jong term management phase, as described in the Banking Agreements and related documents. 5.11.3 Access & Non-Interference. Grantor shall provide access to the Banking Agencies or their agents or designees as needed to fulfill their obligations, as set forth in the Banking Agreements. In the event that Grantor assigns its responsibilities under the Long-Term Management Plan ("Plan"), as provided for in the Banking Agreements, Grantor shall refrain from impeding or otherwise interfering with implementation of the Plan. Activities in furtherance of the Plan are to be carried out by the Sponsors or their assignees as approved by the Banking Agencies. Such activities may include, but are not limited to, maintenance and repair of water control structures; maintenance, repair, removal, or abandonment of structural elements of the Mitigation Bank; and removal of invasive plant species. 6. USES AND ACTIVITIES INCONSISTENT WITH THE PURPOSE OF THE EASEMENT 6.1. General. Any use of, or activity on, the Protected Property inconsistent with the Purpose of this Easement is prohibited, and Grantor acknowledges and agrees that it will not conduct, engage in, or permit any such use or activity. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following uses of, or activities on, the Protected Property, although not an exhaustive list of inconsistent uses or activities, are inconsistent with the Purpose of this Easement and shall be prohibited: 6.1.1. Subdivision. The legal or "de facto" division or subdivision of the Protected Property, which shall include, but not be limited to, any subdivision, short subdivision, platting, binding site plan, or other process by which the Protected Property is divided into lots. This prohibition shall not be interpreted to preclude any lot line adjustment that does not create a number oflots that is greater than the number oflots in existence on the effective date of this Easement. 6.1.2. Construction. The placement, installation, or construction of any buildings, structures, or other improvements of any kind, including, but not limited to, roads, railroads, utilities, cellular phone towers, septic systems, wells, recreational facilities, and parking lots, except as expressly provided in Section 5 above, including, specifically, those uses and activities provided for in the Mitigation Bank Plans and Specifications. 6.1.3. Alteration of Land. The alteration of the surface of the land, including, Springbrook Conservation Easement 7 October 3, 2006 without limitation, the excavation or removal of soil, sand, gravel, rock, peat, or sod, except in conjunction with a use or activity expressly allowed in Section 5 above, including, specifically, those uses and activities provided for in the Mitigation Bank Plans and Specifications. 6.1.4. Erosion or Water Pollution. Any use or activity that causes or is likely to cause significant soil degradation or erosion or significant pollution of any surface or subsurface waters. For the purposes of this Easement, the uses and activities expressly allowed under Section 5 above, including, specifically, those uses and activities provided for in the Mitigation Bank Plans and Specifications, shall be deemed to not violate this prohibition. 6.1.5. Removal of Trees and Other Vegetation. The pruning, topping, cutting down, uprooting, girdling, or other destruction or removal of live and dead trees and other vegetation, except as expressly provided in Section 5 above or in conjunction with a use or activity expressly allowed in Section 5 above, including, specifically, those uses and activities provided for in the Mitigation Bank Plans and Specifications. 6.1.6. Waste Disposal. The disposal, storage, or Release of Hazardous Substances, rubbish, garbage, debris, unregistered vehicles, abandoned equipment, parts thereof, or other offensive waste or material. The term "Release" shall mean release, generation, treatment, disposal, storage, dumping, burying, or abandonment. The term "Hazardous Substances" shall mean any substances, materials, or wastes that are hazardous, toxic, dangerous, or harmful, or are designated as, or contain components that are, or are designated as, hazardous, toxic, dangerous, or harmful, and/or that are subject to regulation as hazardous, toxic, dangerous, or harmful or as a pollutant by any federal, state, or local law, regulation, statute, or ordinance, including, but not limited to, petroleum or any petroleum product. 6.1. 7. Mining. The exploration for, or development and extraction of, oil, gas, coal, limestone, fossils, metals, geothermal resources, sand, gravel, or rock of any type on or below the surface of the Protected Property, except as expressly provided in rights ofrecord as of the effective date of this Easement, as set forth in Section 2.3 and Exhibit C. 6.1.8. Recreational Activities. The undertaking of recreational activities and the installation or construction of improvements in furtherance of the same, except as expressly provided in Section 5 above. 7. NOTICE AND APPROVAL 7.1. Notice. 7.1.1. Grantor. Certain provisions of this Easement require Grantor to notify Grantee and/or to receive Grantee's written approval prior to undertaking certain permitted uses and activities (e.g., Sections 5.4 [habitat stewardship -material deviations form Mitigation Bank Plans and Specifications], 5.7 [signage], and 11.3 [subsequent transfers]). The purpose of requiring Grantor to notify Grantee prior to undertaking these permitted uses and activities is to afford Grantee an adequate opportunity to ensure that the use or activity in question is designed and carried out in a manner consistent with the Purpose of this Easement. Whenever such notice Springbrook Conservation Easement 8 October 3. 2006 is required, Grantor shall notify Grantee in writing not less than thirty (30) days prior to the date Grantor intends to undertake the use or activity in question. The notice shall describe the nature, scope, design, location, timetable, and any other material aspect of the proposed use or activity in sufficient detail to permit Grantee to make an informed judgment as to its consistency with the terms of this Easement and the Purpose thereof. 7.1.2. Grantee. Certain provisions of this Easement require Grantee to give notice to Grantor prior to undertaking certain activities (e.g., Sections 4.2 [access], 4.3 [scientific/educational use], 4.8 [weed control], 10.2 [taxes], and 13.1 [assignment]). Whenever such notice is required, Grantee shall notify Grantor in writing not less than thirty (30) days prior to the date Grantee intends to undertake the use or activity in question, unless otherwise provided for by this Easement. 7.2. Approval. Where approval by one of the Parties is required under this Easement, such approval shall be granted or denied in writing within thirty (30) days of receipt of a written request for approval, and such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned. Such approval may include reasonable conditions consistent with the Banking Agreements that must be satisfied in undertaking the proposed use or activity. 7.3. Optional Consultation. If Grantor is unsure whether a proposed use or activity is prohibited by this Easement, Grantor may consult Grantee by providing Grantee a written notice describing the nature, scope, design, location, timetable, and any other material aspect of the proposed use or activity in sufficient detail to permit Grantee to make an informed judgment as to its consistency with the Purpose of this Easement and to provide comments thereon to Grantor. This Section 7.3 does not itself impose a requirement of prior approval of the activity described in any such notice. 7.4. Addresses. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, or communication that any party desires or is required to give to the others shall be in writing and either personally delivered or sent by first class certified mail, postage prepaid, or by facsimile (if available) with original dispatched by certified mail, addressed as follows, or to such other address as any party from time to time shall designate by written notice to the others: To Grantor: To Grantee: To Assignee: City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Attn: Surface Water Utility Engineering Supervisor Cascade Land Conservancy 615 Second Avenue, Suite 625 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: Senior Conservation Director Washington State Department of Transportation P.O. Box 47338 Olympia, WA 98504-7338 Springbrook Conservation Easement 9 October 3. 2006 Attn: Director, Real Estate Services And to Washington State Department of Transportation P.O. Box 47331 Olympia, WA 98504-7331 Attn: Director, Environmental Services 8. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION 8.1. Preventive Discussions. Grantor and Grantee will promptly give the other notice of problems or concerns arising in connection with the other's actions under the Easement or the use of or activities or conditions on the Protected Property, and will meet as needed, but no later than fifteen (15} days after receipt of a written request for a meeting, to minimize the same. The party giving notice according to this section shall provide a copy thereof to Assignee. 8.2. Mediation/Alternative Dispute Resolution. If a dispute arises between the Parties concerning the consistency of any present or proposed use or activity with the Purpose of this Easement, and ifGrantor agrees not to continue or proceed with the use or activity pending resolution of the dispute, the Parties shall meet together to discuss the dispute and attempt resolution. If the dispute is not resolved through preventive discussions, either party may thereafter refer the dispute to mediation by request made in writing to the other with a copy to Assignee, or the Parties may, by mutual agreement, utilize other forms of alternative dispute resolution. Within thirty (30) days of the receipt of a mediation request, the Parties shall select a single mediator to hear the matter. The matter shall be settled in accordance with any Washington State mediation statute then in effect. 9. JUDICIAL RESOLUTION 9.1. Notice of Violation, Corrective Action. If either party determines that the other is in violation of the terms of this Easement or that a violation is threatened, they shall give written notice to the other of such violation and demand corrective action sufficient to cure the violation and, where the violation involves injury to the Protected Property resulting from any use or activity inconsistent with the Purpose of this Easement, to restore the portion of the Protected Property so injured to its prior condition in accordance with a plan approved by Grantee. The party giving notice according to this section shall provide a copy thereof to Assignee. 9.2. Failure to Respond. Either party may bring an action as provided in Section 9.3 below if the other party: 9.2. 1. Fails to cure the violation within thirty (30) days after receipt of a notice ofviolation; or 9.2.2. Under circumstances where the violation cannot reasonably be cured Springbrook Conservation Easement 10 October 3, 2006 within a thirty (30) day period, fails to begin curing the violation within the thirty (30) day period and fails to continue diligently to cure such violation until finally cured. 9.3. Action. 9.3.1. Injunctive Relief. Either party may bring an action at law or in equity in a court having jurisdiction to enforce the tem1s of this Easement: 9.3.1.1. To enjoin the violation, ex parte as necessary and as allowed under the applicable civil rules, by temporary or pennanent injunction; and 9.3.1.2. To require the restoration of the Protected Property to the condition that existed prior to any such injury. 9.3.2. Damages. The prevailing party shall be entitled to recover damages for violation of the terms of this Easement or injury to any Conservation Values protected by this Easement. Without limiting Grantor's liability in any way, Grantee shall first apply any damages recovered to the cost of undertaking corrective or restoration action on the Protected Property. 9.4. Emergency Enforcement. If Grantee, in its sole discretion, determines that circumstances require immediate action to prevent or mitigate significant damage to the Conservation Values, Grantee may pursue its remedies under this Section 9 without prior notice to Grantor or without waiting for the period provided for cure to expire. 9.5. Scope of Relief. Grantee's rights under this Section 9 apply equally in the event of either actual or threatened violations of the terms of this Easement. Grantor agrees that Grantee's remedies at law for any violation of the terms of this Easement are inadequate and that Grantee shall be entitled to the injunctive relief described in this Section 9, both prohibitive and mandatory, in addition to such other relief to which Grantee may be entitled, including specific performance of the terms of this Easement, without the necessity of proving either actual damages or the inadequacy of otherwise available legal remedies. Grantee's remedies described in this Section 9 shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to all remedies now or hereafter existing at law or in equity. 9.6. Costs of Enforcement. Except as provided in Section 8.1 above, in the event a party to this Easement finds it necessary to bring an action at law or other proceeding against the other party to enforce any of the provisions of this Easement, or by reason of any breach or default under fuis Easement, the prevailing party in any such action or proceeding shall be paid all costs and reasonable attorneys' fees by the other party. 9.7. Discretion in Enforcement. Enforcement of the terms of this Easement shall be at the discretion of Grantee, and any forbearance by Grantee to exercise its rights under this Easement in the event of any breach of any terms of this Easement by Grantor, its agents, employees, contractors, invitees or licensees shall not be deemed or construed to be a waiver by Grantee of such term of any of Grantee's rights under this Easement. No delay or omission by Grantee in the exercise of any right or remedy upon any breach by Grantor shall impair such Springbrook Conservation Easement 11 October 3, 2006 right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. 9.8. Acts Beyond Party's Control. Neither Grantor nor Grantee shall be in default or violation as to any obligation created hereby and no condition precedent or subsequent shall be deemed to fail to occur if such party is prevented from fulfilling such obligation by, or such condition fails to occur due to: 9.8. I. Actions by trespasser upon the Protected Property; 9.8.2. Forces beyond such party's reasonable control, caused by a natural or human-caused catastrophic event or a deliberate and unlawful act by a third-party, which forces by exercise of due diligence and foresight such party could not reasonably have expected to avoid. A natural catastrophic event includes a flood equal to or greater in magnitude than the 100-year flood event, an earthquake of a force projected from an earthquake with a return period of 475 years, or a debilitating drought, disease, wildfire, depredation, regional pest infestation, or fluvioigeomorphic change. A human-caused catastrophic event includes war, insurrection, riot or other civil disorders, spill of a hazardous or toxic substance, or fire. A deliberate and unlawful act includes the dumping of a hazardous or toxic substance, vandalism, or arson; or 9.8.3. Any action deemed reasonable by Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant iajury to the Protected Property resulting from such causes. In the event the terms of this Easement are violated by acts of trespassers, Grantor agrees, at Grantee's option and expense, to join in any suit, to assign its right of action to Grantee, or to appoint Grantee its attorney in fact, for the purpose of pursuing enforcement action against the responsible parties. 9.9. Compliance Certificates. Upon request by Grantor, Grantee shall within thirty (30) days execute and deliver to Grantor, or to any party designated by Grantor, any document, including a letter of compliance, that certifies, to the best of Grantee's knowledge, the status of Grantor's compliance with any obligation of Grantor contained in this Easement and otherwise evidences the status of this Easement. 10. COSTS, LIABILITIES, TAXES, ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE, AND INDEMNIFICATION I 0.1. Costs, Legal Requirements, Liabilities and Insurance. Grantor retains all responsibilities and shall bear all costs and liabilities of any kind related to the ownership, operation, upkeep, and maintenance of the Protected Property. 10.2. Taxes and Other Costs. Grantor shall pay any taxes, fees and charges assessed against the Protected Property by governmental authority as they become due, including taxes imposed upon, or incurred as a result of, this Easement, and shall furnish Grantee with satisfactory evidence of payment upon request. To preserve its rights under this Easement, Grantee may, but is in no event obligated to, make payment of any taxes upon five (5) days prior written notice to Grantor, in accordance with any bill, statement, or estimate procured from the Springbrook Conservation Easement 12 October 3. 2006 appropriate authority, without inquiry into the validity of the taxes or the accuracy of the bill, statement or estimate, and the obligation to Grantee created by such payment will bear interest until paid by Grantor at the same rate imposed by the relevant governmental authority for the late payment of the tax so paid by Grantee. 10.3. Representations and Warranties. Gran tor represents and warrants that to Grantor's actual knowledge, and except as disclosed to Grantee in writing prior to the effective date of this Easement: 10.3.1. There are no apparent or latent defects in or on the Protected Property, such as an open well, garbage dump, abandoned underground tanks, or hazardous waste dump; and 10.3.2. Grantor and the Protected Property are in compliance with all federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and requirements applicable to the Protected Property and its use, including, but not limited to, environmental laws, regulations, and requirements. 10.4. Control. Nothing in this Easement shall be construed as giving rise, in the absence of a judicial decree, to any right or ability in Grantee to exercise physical or managerial control over the day-to-day operations of the Protected Property, or any of Grantor's activities on the Protected Property, or otherwise to become an operator with respect to the Protected Property within the meaning of the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended ("CERCLA"), and the Model Toxics Control Act, as amended ("MTCA"). 10.5. Grantor's Indemnification. Grantor shall hold harmless, indemnify, and defend Grantee and its members, directors, officers, employees, agents, and contractors ( collectively "Grantee Indemnified Parties") from and against all liabilities, penalties, costs, losses, damages, expenses, causes of action, claims, demands, or j udgrnents, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' and consultants' fees, arising from or in any way connected with breach of its representations and warranties or injury to or the death of any person, or physical damage to any property, resulting from any act, omission, condition, or other matter related to or occurring on or about the Protected Property that is not a consequence of any action or omission of any of the Grantee Indemnified Parties on or about the Protected Property. 10.6. Grantee's Indemnification. Grantee shall hold harmless, indemnify, and defend Grantor and Grantor's members, directors, officers, employees, agents, and contractors ( collectively "Grantor Indemnified Parties") from and against all liabilities, penalties, costs, losses, damages, expenses, causes of action, claims, demands, or judgments, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' and consultants' fees, arising from or in any way connected with injury to or the death of any person, or physical damage to any property, resulting from any act, omission, condition, or other matter related to or occurring on or about the Protected Property that is a consequence of Grantee's actions or omissions or the actions or omissions of Grantee's members, directors, officers, employees, agents, or contractors on or about the Protected Property. Springbrook Conservation Easement 13 October 3, 2006 11. EXTINGUISHMENT, CONDEMNATION, AND SUBSEQUENT TRANSFER 11.1. Extinguisbment. If circumstances arise in the future that render the Purpose of this Easement impossible to accomplish, this Easement can only be terminated or extinguished, whether in whole or in part, by the Parties' mutual agreement and with the written approval of the Banking Agencies, or by judicial proceedings of a court having jurisdiction. Unless otherwise agreed to by the Parties, Grantee shall have no compensable interest in this Easement under such circumstances and Grantee acknowledges that its compensation relating to its obligations under this Easement is provided for under separate agreement with the Grantor. The immediately foregoing provision shall be limited solely to the circumstances described in this Section 11.1, and shall not be interpreted to have any application or inference to any other provision of, or circumstance under, this Easement, including, but not limited to, those provisions pertaining to Grantee's rights to enforce the terms of this Easement and Grantee's rights to damages to, or the cost of restoring, the Conservation Values. 11.2. Condemnation. If the Easement is taken, in the whole or in the part, by the exercise of the power of eminent domain, Grantee shall not be entitled to compensation and the entirety of any compensation award shall belong to Grantor. The immediately foregoing provision shall be limited solely to the circumstances described in this Section 11.2, and shall not be interpreted to have any application or inference to any other provision of, or circumstance under, this Easement, including, but not limited to, those provisions pertaining to Grantee's rights to enforce the terms of this Easement and Grantee's rights to damages to, or the cost of restoring, the Conservation Values. 11.3. Subsequent Transfers. Grantor agrees to: 11.3 .1. Incorporate the terms of this Easement by reference in any deed or other legal instrument by which it divests itself of any interest in all or a portion of the Protected Property, including, without limitation, a leasehold interest; 11.3.2. Describe this Easement in and append it to any executory contract for the transfer of any interest in the Protected Property; and 11.3.3. Give written notice to Grantee of the transfer of any interest in all or a portion of the Protected Property prior to the date of such transfer. Such notice to Grantee shall include the name, address, and telephone number of the transferee or the transferee's representative. The failure of Grantor to perform any act required by this Section 11.3 shall not impair the validity of this Easement or limit its enforceability in any way. 11.4. No Merger. In the event that Grantee acquires the fee title to the Protected Property, it is Grantor's and Grantee's intention that no merger of title shall take place that would merge the restrictions of this Easement with fee title to the protected property and thereby eliminate them, and that the restrictions on the use of the Protected Property, as embodied in this Springbrook Conservation Easement 14 October 3, 2006 Easement, shall, in the event title becomes vested in Grantee, become and remain permanent and perpetual restrictions on the use of the Protected Property. Furthermore, the Grantee agrees to incorporate the provisions in this Grant Deed of Conservation Easement in any subsequent conveyance of an interest in the Protected Property. 12. AMENDMENT 12.1. Amendment to Expand Arca. Grantor and Grantee are free to jointly amend this Easement to increase the real property that is subject to this Easement, provided that any such additional real property is contiguous with the property that is already subject to this Easement. Any such amendment shall be recorded in the official records of King County, Washington, and any other jurisdiction in which such recording is required. 12.2 Other Amendments. If circumstances arise under which any other amendment to or modification of this Easement would be appropriate, Grantor and Grantee are free to jointly amend this Easement upon approval of such amendment or modification by the Banking Agencies. Any such amendment shal I be recorded in the official records of King County, Washington, and any other jurisdiction in which such recording is required. 13. ASSIGNMENT AND SUCCESSION 13.1. Assignment Generally. With Grantor's written approval, which will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed, and the Banking Agencies' written approval, this Easement is transferable, but Grantee may assign its rights and obligations under this Easement only to an organization that is authorized to acquire and hold conservation easements under RCW 64.04.130 or RCW 84.34.210 ( or any successor provision(s) then applicable). As a condition of such transfer, Grantee shall require that the transferee exercise its rights under the assignment consistent with the Purpose of this Easement. Grantee shall notify Grantor in writing forty-five (45) days prior to such assignment at Grantor's last known address. 13.2. Assignment to WSDOT. The Grantee agrees to assign this Easement to the Washington State Department of Transportation ("Assignee") at such time as all of the Assignee's banking credits have been sold, used or transferred, or the Sponsors have permanently ceased banking activities, whichever occurs earlier (Termination of Assignee's Mitigation Bank Operational Life). Assignee shall certify in writing to Grantor, Grantee and the Bank Oversight Committee that the events necessary for Termination of Assignee's Mitigation Bank Operational Life have occurred, and that Assignee requests Assignment of the Easement pursuant to this Section. Upon Grantee's receipt of Grantor's written approval, which will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed, and receipt of the Banking Agencies' written approval, Grantee shall assign, and WSDOT shall accept assignment under an Assignment of Easement substantially in the form of Exhibit E. Assignee will be obligated to all terms of this Easement and will hold this Easement as Grantee from that point on in perpetuity. 13.3. Succession. If at any time (a) it becomes impossible for Grantee to ensure compliance with the covenants, terms, conditions and restrictions contained in this Easement, (b) the Grantor and the Banking Agencies, or the Banking Agencies alone, determine that this Springbrook Conservation Easement 15 October 3, 2006 Easement should be assigned due to any reasons of actual non performance by the Grantee, including, but not limited to, circumstances under which actual non performance occurs because Grantee is the holder of both the fee title to the Protected Property and this Easement, (c) Grantee ceases to exist or to be authorized to acquire and hold conservation easements under RCW 64.04.130 and 84.34.210 (or any successor provision(s) then applicable), or (d) Grantee is otherwise released from its liabilities and obligations under the Easement, then, if Grantee has been provided forty five ( 45) days prior notice and opportunity to cure any non performance or otherwise remedy any other circumstance forming the basis of any transfer under this Section 13.3, and subject to the Preventative Discussion provisions under Section 8.2 above if applicable, Grantee's rights and obligations under this Easement shall become vested and fall upon the Banking Agencies or such other entity, with purposes similar to Grantee's, that is authorized to acquire and hold conservation easements under RCW 64.04.130 or RCW 84.34.210 (or any successor provision(s) then applicable), to the extent that they shall accept this Easement; provided that if such vesting is deemed to be void under the Rule Against Perpetuities, the rights and obligations under this Easement shall vest in such organization as a court having jurisdiction shall direct, pursuant to the applicable Washington law and with due regard to the Purpose of this Easement. 14. RECORDATION Grantee shall record this Easement in a timely fashion in the official records of King County, Washington, and in any other appropriate jurisdictions, and may re-record it at any time as may be required to preserve its rights in this Easement. 15. GENERAL PROVISIONS 15.1. Controlling Law. The interpretation and performance of this Easement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington. 15.2. Liberal Construction. Any general rule of construction to the contrary notwithstanding, this Easement shall be liberally construed in favor of the grant to affect the Purpose of this Easement. If any provision in this Easement is found to be ambiguous, an interpretation consistent with the Purpose of this Easement that would render the provision valid shall be favored over any interpretation that would render it invalid. 15.3. Severability. If any provision of this Easement, or its application to any person or circumstance, is found to be invalid, the remainder of the provisions of this Easement, or the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is found to be invalid, as the case may be, shall not be affected. 15.4. Entire Agreement. Except as to the Conservation Easement Reimbursement Agreement for Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank, all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings, communications, or oral agreements regarding this Easement have been superseded by, and are merged into, this Easement. 15.5. No Forfeiture. This Easement does not convey any interest in the Protected Springbrook Conservation Easement 16 October 3, 2006 Property other than the rights specifically provided herein. 15.6. "Grantor" -"Grantee". The terms "Grantor'' and "Grantee," wherever used in this Easement, and any pronouns used in their place, shall be held to mean and include, respectively the above-named Grantor. and its successors and assigns, and the above-named Grantee, and its successors and assigns. 15.7. Successors and Assigns. The covenants, terms, conditions, and restrictions of this Easement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the Parties to this Easement and their respective successors and assigns, and shall continue as a servitude running in perpetuity with the Protected Property, unless sooner terminated as expressly provided for herein. No term or provision of this Easement is intended to be, or shall be, for the benefit of any person, firm, organization, or corporation not a party to this Easement, and no such other person, firm, organization, or corporation shall have any right or cause of action hereunder, except as expressly provided in Section 13 above. 15.8. Termination of Rights and Obligations. A party's rights and obligations under this Easement terminate upon transfer of the party's interest in the Easement or Protected Property, except that liability for acts or omissions occurring prior to transfer shall survive transfer. 15.9. Counterparts. The Parties may execute this Easement in two or more counterparts, which shall be signed by all Parties. Each counterpart shall be deemed an original instrument as against any party who has signed it. In the event of any disparity between the counterparts produced, the recorded counterpart shall be controlling. 15.10. Recitals. Each recital set forth above is fully incorporated into this Easement. 15.11. Effective Date. The effective date of this Easement is the date of recording of this Easement. 15.12. Authority. The individuals signing below, if signing on behalf of any entity, represent and warrant that they have the requisite authority to bind the entity on whose behalf they are signing. 15.13. Captions. The captions in this Easement have been inserted solely for convenience and ease of reference and are not a part of this Easement and shall have no effect upon construction or interpretation. 16. SCHEDULE OF EXHIBITS 16.1. Exhibit A-Legal Description of Property Subject to Easement. 16.2. Exhibit B -Site Map(s). 16.4. Exhibit C -Permitted Exceptions Springbrook Conservation Easement 17 October 3, 2006 16.5 Exhibit D -Agreement for Release From Liability 16.6 Exhibit E -Assignment of Easement To HA VE AND TO HOLD unto Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Grantor has executed this Easement this J~ay of~ ,2006. CITY OF RENTON, Grantor The CASCADE LAND CONSERVANCY does hereby accept the above Grant Deed of Conservation Easement. Dated: /a ·if.Ob CASCADE LAND CONSERVANCY, Grantee THE WASHINGTON STA TE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION does hereby accept its designation as Assi~ upon the occurrence of those events described in Paragraph 13.2 above. Dated: 4,4::./t 3 1 ,()-0() t, Springbrook Conservation Easement 18 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION erv1ces October 3. 2006 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this _1.iL_ day of Dt:h: L~ ( 2006, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned ang_,swom, personally appeared Ktc+JYj Kulllt\ to me known to be the/ljp..yal'~c;fry OF RENTON, the Washington limited liability company that executed the within and foregoing Easement, and acknowledged the said Easement to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said company for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said Easement. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) wJJ.d. Jt.u:t }1'J7.,1v1\. OT ARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at h, nftn Print Name: A, 1 L41l lt ll/'lt ti 11 ,1 My commission expires "! 2-b{,"7 On this L./#' day of t'.}~W 2006, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, dulx.,co~issioned and sworn, personally appeared ~Y o' (..;::il'V:f Bt;i ,'f!RHOI' to me known to be the Pl1ict~ of Cascade Land Conservancy, the Washington nonprofit corporation that executed the within and foregoing Easement, and acknowledged the said Easement to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said Easement. WI1NESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the deal and year in this certificate above written. Springbrook Conservation Ea.semen/ 19 October 3. 2006 EXHIBIT A to GRANT DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT Legal Description of Property Subject to Easement Units A, Band E of City ofRenton Lot Line Adjustment No. LUA-06-095-LLA, recorded under King County Recording No. 20060824900007, as more particularly described in the attached Sheet 2 thereof; TOGETHER WITH Unit C of said Lot Line Adjustment, as more particularly described in the attached Sheet 2 thereof, EXCEPT that portion of said unit lying northerly of the southernmost line of the easement granted to Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. recorded under King County Recording Number 20050303000964; and TOGETHER WITH the north 721 feet of Unit D of said Lot Line Adjustment, as more particularly described in the attached Sheet 2 thereof. Situated in Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., and in Sections 25 and 36 of Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., all in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. Springbrook Conservation Easement 20 October 3, 2006 T. 23N. R. 4E. W.M. T. 23N. R. 5E. W.M. ~"' 4-)'\l ~,>'t~ I \ C 0"'"'' 25 0"''' \l -- S~'fT'r 1,,;T-:r I'\ ;\ (r~,,_,, ~ ti '~ =-,---,~=-=-::::::: I' -/1 11 1/-------ti A i £1 ? ~'"''1 /. / I ~' i ~/. _J JI -i ~q"r ··~ :i; 0~ ~') 1'"' r ,_, ... ,_.; ~· " s llo"<ll';T~ 36 ._,.: ..... w w 'Ct' LO er: er: l 'I) ~ f !l 30 31 -----SPRINGBROOK CREEi< WETLANO AND HABITAT 1,!ITIGATION BANK BOUNDARIES. -• --• --PEDESTRIAN TRAIL BOUNDARIES = '"° 0 '" ,_ ~CAL( l~ C(CT EXHIBIT -B EXHIBITCto GRANT DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT Permitted Exceptions Those restrictions, reservations and protective covenants, and those easements identified as "remaining" or "portion remaining," all as shown on Sheets 12 through 19 inclusive of the City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LUA-06-095-LLA recorded under King County Recording No. 20060824900007, copies of which are attached hereto. Springbrook Conservation Easement 22 October 3, 2006 EXHIBIT D to GRANT DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT Agreement for Release from Liability In consideration for pem1ission to enter certain property, the Springbrook Creek Mitigation Bank, in King County, Washington, owned by City of Renton (hereafter the "Protected Property") to observe and study the ecology of the Protected Property, I hereby acknowledge and agree to the following: 1. My activities in the Protected Property involve many risks, including, but not limited to, risks of bodily injury/illness or death resulting from accident, poisonous plants or animals; 2. I am entering the Protected Property at my own risk and I assume full responsibility for the risk of bodily injury or death, whether foreseen or unforeseen, in connection with my activities in the Protected Property; 3. I HEREBY RELEASE, WAIVE AND DISCHARGE CITY OF RENTON and their personal representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns, and the CASCADE LAND CONSERVANCY and its personal representatives, successors, and assigns from any liability for harm or loss suffered by me in connection with my activities in the Protected Property, WHETHER BY NEGLIGENCE OR NOT, and I FURTHER SAVE AND HOLD HARMLESS CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, and their personal representatives, heirs, successors or assigns, and the CASCADE LAND CONSERVANCY, and its personal representatives, successors, and assigns, from any and all liability, actions, causes of action, claims, demands of every kind and nature whatsoever by me or my family, estate, heirs, executors, administrators, legal representatives, successors or assigns arising out my activities in the Protected Property; 4. I hereby expressly agree that this "AGREEMENT FOR RELEASE FROM LIABILITY" is intended to be as broad and inclusive as permitted by the laws of the State of Washington, and if any portion thereof is held invalid, it is agreed that the balance shall, notwithstanding, continue in full force and effect; and 5. This "AGREEMENT FOR RELEASE FROM LIABILITY" contains the entire agreement between the parties hereto and that the terms of this Agreement are contractual in nature and not a mere recital; I understand all of the terms; and I am of lawful age and legally competent to sign this Agreement. ** I HA VE FULLY INFORMED MYSELF OF THE CONTENT OF THIS "AGREEMENT FOR RELEASE FROM LIABILITY" BY READING IT CAREFULLY BEFORE SIGNING IT. Name (pnnt) Signature ate City/County/State Springbrook Conservation Easement 23 October 3, 2006 EXHIBIT E to GRANT DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT Assignment of Easement Springbrook Conservation Easement 24 October 3, 2006 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: CITY OF RENTON 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Attn: Surface Water Utility Engineering Supervisor ASSIGNMENT OF GRANT DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT Assignor: Cascade land Conservancy Assignee: Washington State Department of Transportation Legal Description Ptn ofW 1/2 of Section 30, T23N, R5E, W.M. and Ptn of Section 25, T23N, R4E, W.M. and Ptn of NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 36, T23N, R4E. W.M., all in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. Additional legal description: at Exhibit A. Assessor's Tax Parcel Numbers: 1) 125381-0090-05 (Unit A); 2) 252304-9004 (Unit B); 3) Ptn of252304-9019 (Unit C); 4) Ptn of362304-9002-06 (Unit D); and 4)125381-0240-04 (Unit E) Reference Number of Related Document [Easement]: ________ _ THIS ASSIGNMENT OF GRANT DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT ("Assignment") is entered into by and between CASCADE LAND CONSERVANCY, a Washington nonprofit company ("Assignor"), and the WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, a state agency of the State of Washington ("Assignee") (collectively, the "Parties"). RECITALS A. Assignor is the Grantee under that certain Grant Deed of Conservation Easement, made by the City of Renton, Grantor, in favor of Grantee, dated , 2006, and recorded in the real property records of King County, Washington, under Auditor's File No. _________ ("Easement"). The Easement is attached hereto as Exhibit B. Springbrook Conservation Easement 25 October 3, 2006 B. The Easement provides for the preservation and protection in perpetuity of certain real property located in King County, Washington (the "Protected Property"), as legally described in Exhibit A hereto. C. The City of Renton (Grantor of the Easement) and Assignee are collectively the sponsors of a mitigation bank, known as the Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank ("Mitigation Bank"). The Easement is a condition of the operation of the Mitigation Bank. D. The Easement requires Assignor to assign the Easement to Assignee upon certain events (Termination of Assignee's Mitigation Bank Operational Life), which events have now occurred. E. Assignee is authorized to acquire and hold conservation easements under RCW 64.04.130. F. Assignor desires to assign all of its right, title and interest in the Easement to Assignee, and Assignee desires to accept all right, title and interest in the Easement. G. The City of Renton has provided Assignor with its written approval of this Assignment, as have the Washington Department of Ecology and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (the Banking Agencies). AGREEMENT NOW THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound and for good and valuable consideration, including the mutual covenants and promises of the parties, the adequacy and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. Assignment. 1.1 Assignor hereby assigns all of its right, title and interest in the Easement to Assignee in consideration for Assignee's assumption of all of Assignor's stewardship and management obligations under the Easement. Upon assignment, Assignor has no further rights, responsibilities or obligations under the Easement. 1.2 Assignee hereby assumes all of the rights and obligations of Assignor as Grantee under the Easement, and agrees to exercise its rights and obligations under this Assignment consistent with the Purposes and terms of the Easement. 2. Assignee's address for notices to Grantee under Section 7 of the Easement is: Washington State Department of Transportation P.O. Box 47338 Olympia, WA 98504-7338 Attn: Director, Real Estate Services Springbrook Conservation Easement 26 October 3. 2006 And Washington State Department of Transportation P.O. Box 47331 Olympia, WA 98504-7331 Attn: Director, Environmental Services 3. General Terms 3.1 Entire Agreement. This Assignment contains the entire integrated agreement of the Parties, including all of the covenants and conditions between the parties, with respect to the subject matter of this Assignment, and supersedes all prior correspondence, agreements, and understandings, both oral and written. 3.2 Authority. Each undersigned representative of the parties certifies that he or she is fully authorized to enter into the terms and conditions of this Assignment and to legally execute, and bind such party to, this Assignment. 3.3 Recitals. Each recital and exhibit set forth above is fully incorporated into this Assignment. 3.4 Effective Date. The effective date of this Assignment shall be the earliest date by which both Assignor and Assignee have executed this instrument. To HA VE AND TO HOLD unto Assignee, its successors and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Assignor has executed this Assignment this_ day of ____ ,20_. CASCADE LAND CONSERVANCY, Assignor By __________ _ __________ [name] _________ [title] The WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION does hereby accept the above Assignment of Grant Deed of Conservation Easement. Dated:-----------~ Springbrook Conservation Easement 27 WASHING TON STA TE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By. __________ _ __________ [name] _________ [title] October 3. 2006 STA TE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this __ day of 20 _, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared ___________ tome known to be the President of Cascade Land Conservancy, the Washington nonprofit corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated thats/he is authorized to execute the said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the deal and year in this certificate above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at. _______ _ Print Name: ___________ _ My commission expires. _______ _ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this __ day of 2006, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared __________ [name] to me known to be the [title] of the Washington State Department of Transportation, the agency of the State of Washington that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said agency for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that s/he is authorized to execute the said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the deal and year in this certificate above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at. _______ _ Print Name:. ___________ _ My commission expires. _______ _ Springbrook Conservation Easement 28 October 3, 2006 EXHIBIT A to ASSIGNMENT OF GRANT DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT Legal Description of Propertv Units A, Band E of City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LUA-06-095-LLA, recorded under King County Recording No. 20060824900007, as more particularly described in the attached Sheet 2 thereof; TOGETHER WITH Unit C of said Lot Line Adjustment, as more particularly described in the attached Sheet 2 thereof, EXCEPT that portion of said unit lying northerly of the southernmost line of the easement granted to Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. recorded under King County Recording Number 20050303000964; and TOGETHER WITH the north 721 feet of Unit D of said Lot Line Adjustment, as more particularly described in the attached Sheet 2 thereof. Situated in Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., and in Sections 25 and 36 of Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., all in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. Springbrook Conservation Easement 29 October 3, 2006 EXHIBITBto ASSIGNMENT OF GRANT DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT Conservation Easement Springbrook Conservation Easement 30 October 3, 2006 FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF AFTERB RECORDING RETURN TO: The City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way, 5th Fl Renton, WA 98055 111111111111111111 20060825002236 Attn: Ron Straka PACIFIC NW TIT TERM 41,00 PAGE001 OF 010 08/25/2006 16:02 KING COUNTY, WA RELINQUISHMENT OF ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT Document Title: Relinquishment of Access and Utility Easement Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: 8304250790 Gran tor: King County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington Grantee: The City of Renton Legal Description: Lts 1, 2, 7 & 8, Blk 6; Lts 1, 6 & 7, Blk 7; Lts 1, 2 & 4, Blk 8, Burlington Northern Ind. Park Renton II, Vol. 111, pg 42 and Ptn NEY. and NWY. of Section 25, T23N, R4E, WM Assessor's Property Tax Parcel No.: 125381-0090-05, 252304-9004-07, 252304-9019- 00, 125381-0230-06, 125381-0170-08, 362304-9002-06, 125381-0240-04 H-1\jj\ s-,11~, 1-a-'3 Jd.+ ""'\oS -I-;}-Cf0i,t1 KING COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDNISION OF THE STATE OF i ASHINGTON does by execution of this document hereby terminate and relinquish any and all interest KING COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDNISION OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON has in the unrecorded agreement for sewer easement disclosed by Special Warranty Deed No. BNRRPI-35A recorded April 25, 1983 under Recording Number 8304250790 and an Easement dated October 17, 1967, recorded under Recording Number 6255262 to the CITY OF RENTON, a municipal corporation the following described real property situated in King County, in the state of Washington: For legal description see Exhibit A and B attached hereto and made a part hereof. Dated this King County, a political subdivision of The State of Washington /_2r~ f-:1 Calvin Hoggard, Section Manager Real Estate Services Section EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED K!r.i Co. Reo;;;ds OMskn BY. ~~\J""-~ Page 1 of 10 pages 8-2000-001 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that /),1~e /?-,e«;;st:h'j'Ts the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that hsigned this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument, and acknowledged it as the Section Manager Real Estate Services Section to be the free and voluntary act of such entity for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Print Name: 1-/-vp(J U,,/1/(k; Notary Public in and for the State of! Washington. Commi sion Expires: t"/ ; i.Ct:9 My appointment expires 8-2000-001 Page 2 of 10 pages EXHIBIT A SPRINGBROOK CREEK WETLAND AND HABITAT MITIGATION BANK UNIT A Parcel A Lots 1, 2, 7 and 8, Block 6, Burlington Northern Industrial Park Renton II, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 111 of Plats, pages 42 through 44, inclusive, records of King County, Washington; Together with that portion of the former 20 foot railroad right-of-way, as delineated on said plat adjoining said lots, as relinquished under Recording Number 8909110687. UNITS BANDC Parcel A All those portions of Government Lot 11, of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter and the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the cast line of Government Lot IO in said Section at a point 255.38 feet southerly, as measured along said east line, from the south line of Henry Meader Donation Land Claim No. 46; thence westerly on a straight line to a point on the easterly line of the Northern Pacific Railway Company Right-of-Way at a point 289.12 feet southerly, as measured along said easterly line, from said south line of the Donation Land Claim and the True Point of Beginning; thence southeasterly to a point on a line parallel with and 60 feet east of said easterly line of the Northern Pacific Railway Company Right-of-Way at a point 1,100 feet north of the east-west centerline of said section; thence south, along said parallel line, to a point on the south line of a tract conveyed to Broadacres, Inc. by deed recorded under Recording Number 7504010373, said point being 545.6 feet north of said east-west centerline; thence east, along said south line to the east line of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section at a point 545.6 feet north of said east-west centerline; thence south, along said east line, to the northwest comer ofLongacres Parkway as delineated on the face 8-2000-001 Page ., of IO pages EXHIBIT A ( continued) of Burlington Northern Industrial Park Renton II, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 111 of Plats, pages 42 through 44, inclusive, records of King County, Washington; thence South 87°57'39" West 1,624.00 feet, more or less, to the intersection of the northerly extension of the easterly line of the proposed P-1 channel as shown on the above referenced plat, said line being 20.00 feet, more or less, west of the northwest comer of Lot 5, Block 9 of said plat; thence southerly, along said extension, to a point which bears South 88°29'29" East from a point being measured along the easterly line of said railroad right-of-way and 2,028.44 feet north of the south line of said Section; Except that portion condemned by Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority by King County Cause No. 02-2-21757-5 and as recorded under Recording Number 20020906001276; Together with all those portions of Government Lot 9 and of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at a point 20 feet west of the east line of Government Lot 9 and 1,254.20 feet south of the north line; thence North 88°24'48!.' West 1,029.43 feet more or less to a point 300 feet east of the west line of Government Lot 9; thence South 01°01 '49" West on a line parallel to and 300 feet east of the west line of Government Lot 9 and the west line of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 25, 845.23 feet; thence South 88°24'48" East 1,032.55 feet more or less to a point 20 feet west of the east line of said southeast quarter of the northeast quarter; thence North 00°49'10" East 845.19 feet to point ofbeginning; Except that portion conveyed for Southwest 27th Street by deed recorded under Recording Number 8203150516; Together with the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; Except the east 20 feet thereof; 8-2000-001 EXHIBIT A ( continued) And Except any portion thereof lying within the Plat of Burlington Northern Industrial Park Renton II, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 111 of Plats, pages 42 through 44, inclusive, records of King County, Washington; And Except that portion lying easterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the north line of said southeast quarter of the northeast quarter which is 300 feet east of the northwest corner; thence South 01 °01 '49" West, on a line parallel to and 300 feet east of the west line of said southeast quarter of the northeast quarter, to the north line of Lot 7, Block 7, Burlington Northern Industrial Park Renton Il, according to the plat thereof recorded m Volume 111 of Plats, pages 42 through 44, inclusive, records of King County, Washington, and the terminus of said line; And Except any portion thereof lying within the following: Beginning at the northeast corner of said Government Lot 9; thence North 87°21 '38" West along the north line thereof a distance of20.0l feet to the west line of the east 20 feet of said Government Lot 9; thence South 00°49'41" West along said west line a distance of 1,254.20 feet to the north line of a tract of land conveyed to the City of Renton by deed recorded under King County Recording Number 7603250650; thence along the north line of said tract of land North 88°24'17" West a distance of 1,022.32 feet to a line parallel with and 300 feet easterly of the west line of said Government Lot 9 and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence along said parallel line North 01 °07'49" East a distance of 45.00 feet; thence North 88°24'17" West a distance of 300.01 feet to the west line of said Government Lot 9; thence along the west line of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 25; South 01°07'49" West a distance of90.00 feet; thence South 88°24'17" East a distance of 300.01 feet to a line parallel with and 300 feei easterly of the west line of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 25; thence along said parallel line North 01 °07'49" East a distance of 45 feet to point of beginning. Parcel B All that portion of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, lying westerly and northerly of the Plat of Burlington Northern Industrial Park Renton II, according to the plat thereof recorded in 8-2000-001 Page 5 of 10 pages EXHIBIT A ( continued) Volume 111 of Plats, pages 42 through 44, inclusive, records of King County, Washington, all being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the northwest comer of Lot 5 in Block 9 of said Plat of Burlington Northern Industrial Park Renton No. II; thence North 88°32'51' West along the north line of said plat, a distance of 20.00 feet to its intersection with the easterly line of proposed P-1 channel; thence North 02°07'11" East along the east line of said channel projected northerly a distance of 1,560.00 feet, more or less, to its intersection with a line that bears North 87°57'39" West from the most northwesterly comer of Longacres Parkway, as dedicated in the Plat of Burlington Northern Industrial Park Renton II, said point being on the west line of Government Lot 9 in the northeast quarter of said Section 25; thence South 87°57'39" East, a distance of 1,624.00 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the northwesterly comer of said right-of-way, said point also being on the west line of said Government Lot 9; thence South O I 0 30'3 l" West along the westerly line of said right-of-way, a distance of 1,570.12 feet to its intersection with the north line of Block 9 of said plat projected easterly, said point also being the southeast comer of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 25; thence North 87°44'27" West along said north line, a distance of 1,347.99 feet; thence North 88°32'51" West along the north line of said Block 9, a distance of 275.79 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Except that portion thereof conveyed to Burlington Northern Railroad Holdings, Inc., by deed recorded under Recording Number 8911170955. Parcel C Lot 7, Block 7, Burlington Northern Industrial Park Renton IT, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 111 of Plats, pages 42 through 44, inclusive, records of King County, Washington; Except that portion of said Lot 7 conveyed to the City of Renton for road purposes by deed recorded under Recording Number 8306090701 and as corrected by Recording Number 8308050568; Together with the west half of the former 20 foot railroad right-of-way adjoining on the east, as relinquished under Recording Number 8909110687. 8-2000-001 Page 6 of 10 pages Parcel D EXHIBIT A ( continued) That portion of Lots 1 and 6, Block 7, Plat of Burlington Northern Industrial Park Renton II, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 111 of Plats, pages 42 through 44, inclusive, records of King County, Washington, lying north of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the east line of said Lot I which lies North 01 °47'34" East 172.52 feet from the southeast corner thereof; thence North 88°29'29" West parallel to the south line of said Lot I, a distance of 1,204.25 feet to the east line of Oakesdale Avenue Southwest and the terminus of said described line: Together with that half of Burlington Northern Railroad Right-of-Way adjoining said described portion of Lots I and 6, as Quit-Claimed under Recording Number 8909110687; Except that portion of said Lot 6, Block 7, conveyed to the City of Renton for street purposes by deed recorded under Recording Number 8306090701 and as corrected by Recording Number 8308050568; (Also Known As Lot I, City of Renton Short Plat No. SHPL-125-89 recorded under Recording Number 9103209006). UNITD Parcel A That portion of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 fast, W.M., in King County, Washington, lying easterly of the Northern Pacific Railroad right-of-way and lying west of the following described line: Beginning at the northeast corner of Henry Adams Donation Land Claim; thence east along the centerline of South 1801h Street (formerly Cord), 114 feet; thence north 30 feet to the north line of aforesaid street and the True Point of Beginning; thence north 644. 78 feet; thence northerly on a straight line, parallel to the east line of said Northern 8-2000-001 !'age 7 of 10 pages EXHIBIT A ( continued) Pacific Railway Company right-of-way, to the north line of said Section 36 and the terminus of said line; Except the south 30 feet thereof; And Except that portion described as follows: Beginning at the southeast comer of said northeast quarter of the northwest quarter; thence north 30 feet; thence west parallel with said south line of said subdivision, to a point 19.95 feet easterly of, as measured at right angles to said Old Main Line Tract centerline and the True Point of Beginning; thence north parallel with said Old Main Line Tract centerline a distance of 213.40 feet; thence westerly as measured at right angles to said Old Main Line Tract centerline, a distance of 20.95 feet to a point distant 50 feet easterly, as measured at right angles to said Old Main Line Tract centerline; thence southerly along a line 50 feet easterly as measured at right angles to said Old Main Line Tract centerline, to a point 30 feet north of the south line of said subdivision; thence east to the point of beginning. UNITE Parcel A Lots 1, 2 and 4, Block 8, Burlington Northern Industrial Park Renton II, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 111 of Plats, pages 42 through 44, inclusive, records of King County, Washington; Together with that portion of the former railroad right-of-way as delineated on said plat adjoining said lots, as relinquished under Recording Number 8909110687; Except the north 463.95 feet of said Lot 4 as measured along the west line thereof; 8-2000-001 Page 8 of 10 pages EXHIBIT A ( continued) Also Except the north 463.95 feet of said former railroad right-of-way as measured along the east line thereof; And Also Except that portion of said Lot 2 described in deed to the City of Renton recorded under Recording Number 8306090701 and correction thereof recorded under Recording Number 8308050568; (Also Known As Lot 1, City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LLA-92-090, recorded under King County Recording Number 9206119003). 8-2000-001 Page 9 of IO pages EXHIBITB Portion of Easement to be relinquished as disclosed by Recording Numbers 6255262 and 8304250790 A permanent easement on a strip of land IO feet in width being 5 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Beginning on the west line of Government Lot 9 and the west line of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, WM, in King County, Washington at a point 414.43 feet southerly of the north line of said southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 25 as measured along said centerline; thence South 88°25'03" East (said course being within the proposed right of way for South 165th Street) a distance of 3607 feet, more or less, to the west line of 92nd Avenue South, also known as Primary State Highway No. 5, except any portion thereof lying within the limits of the drainage ditch belonging to the Drainage District No. l; And except that portion lying within Oaksdale Ave SW. 8-2000-001 Page 10 of 10 pages CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/ BUILDING/ PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM Date: July 19, 2006 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. : Project Name: ; LUA (file) Number: ( Cross-References: , AKA's: Springbrook Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank LUA-06-017, SM ,---------------------------------------- ' Project Manager: ' 1 Acceptance Date: ;, Applicant: , Owner: . Contact: PID Number: . ERC Decision Date: : ERC Appeal Date: l Administrative Approval: ; Appeal Period Ends: : Public Hearing Date: · Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: · HEX Decision: ' Date Appealed to Council: ·, By Whom: ! Council Decision: 1 Mylar Recording Number: Jill Ding March 6, 2006 Allison Ray, WSDOT City of Renton Terry Drochak, WSDOT 1253810090; 2523049004; 1253810170; 1253810230; 2523049019; 3623049002; 1253810240 March 23, 2006 April 13, 2006 Date: Date: Project Description: Construction of a Wetland Mitigation Bank on 6 parcels totalling 131.5 acres in area. · The proposed bank is identified as 5 units (Unit A, Unit B, Unit C, Unit D, and Unit E). The project area is located within the Resource Conservation (RC) and Industrial Medium (IM) zoning desigations. Eight large wetlands totaling approximately 89 acres exist on the subject site and Springbrook flows through portions of the site bordering portions of Units A, B, and E. The proposed project would involve the creation, restoration, and enhancement of wetland areas as mitigation for impacts to wetlands created through the construction of transportation projects by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). A SEPA . Determination of Non-Significance was previously issued by WSDOT December 22, 2005 and a Notice of Action Taken was issued January 10, 2006. Location: 1-405 Corridor & Springbrook Creek Comments: State Department of Ecology requires a 21-day waiting period upon receipt of the approved Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. Wait period ended: April 17, 2006 PARTIES OF RECORD SPRINGBROOK WETLAND BANK LUA06-017, SM Terry Drochak WSDOT -l-405 Project 600 108th Avenue NE ste: #405 Bellevue, WA 98004 tel: 206-456-8595 eml: terry .d rochak@i405. wsdot. wa .gov ( contact) Sandra Whiting Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd ste: #100 Tukwila, WA 98188-2544 tel: 206-431-3663 (party of record) Updated: 03/17/06 Allison Ray WSDOT -l-405 Project 600 108th Avenue NE ste: #405 Bellevue, WA 98004 tel: 425-456-8610 (applicant) Karen Walter Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division 39015 172nd Ave SE Auburn, WA 98092 tel: 253-876-3116 (party of record) (Page 1 of 1) STATE or WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office• 3190 160th Avenue S[ • Re/levuc~ Washington 98008-5452 • (425) 649-7UOO April 12, 2006 Allison Ray I-405 Project Office 600 108th Avenue NE, Suite 405 Bellevue, WA 98004 Dear Allison: Re: City of Renton Shoreline Substantial Development Permit #LUA-017, SM Washington Dept. of Transportation/City of Renton -Owner/Applicant Ecology Shoreline Substantial Development Permit# 2006-NW-50030 Purpose of this letter This letter is to inform you that on March 27, 2006, the Department of Ecology received notice that the City of Renton approved your application to develop the Springbrook Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank to provide compensatory mitigation in advance of unavoidable impacts to wetlands and other aquatic resources from future projects within portions of the Cedar-Sammamish Watershed (WRIA 8) and the Green-Duwamish Watershed (WRIA 9). This 131.54 acre area contains 5 parcels in the Conservancy and Urban shoreline designations of Springbrook Creek. The law requires you to wait at least twenty-one (21) days from the date Ecology received this decision from the City of Renton before you begin the specific activities authorized by this permit. This waiting period is to allow anyone disagreeing with any aspect of your permit to appeal to the Washington State Shorelines Hearings Board. The Shorelines I !earings Board will notify you by letter if they receive an appeal, and if they do you must wait until the appeal is over before you start work. To be sure that the Shorelines Hearings Bo"d hos not rec-.eived an appeal, we advise you to call them at (360) 459-6327 before you begin work. Other federal, state and local permits may be required in addition to this shoreline permit. Please contact me at 425-649-4260 or slan461@ecy.wa.gov if you have any questions ab.out this lett~r. Sincerely, SL:cja ·· cc: Jill K. Ding, City of Renton,/ I March 24, 2006 State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office 3190 160th Ave. SE Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 CITY • RENTON Planning/Building/Public Worlcs Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit for File No. LUA-06-017, SM Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed is the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the above referenced project. The permit was issued by the City of Renton on March 23, 2006. The environmental review (SEPA) was completed on January 10, 2006 by WSDOT (see attached). We are filing this action with the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General per WAC 173-14-090. Please review this permit and attachments and contact me at (425) 430-7219 if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, ~1{-~ Jill K. Ding -u Project Manager Enclosures: Copy of Master Application Administrative Decision Project Description Wetland Bank Site Plan, Grading Sheets, Planting Sheets, and Detail Sheets Notice of Application Legal Description JARPA SEPA Threshold Determination SEPA-Notice of Action Taken cc: Office of Attorney General Applicant/Owner ----:stote-co,...-fe,tte,,<k,e-10-5-5 -So_u_th_Gr_ad_y_W_a_y_--R-en-to_n_. -W-as-h-in_gt_o_n _9_80_5_5 ______ ~ {$1) This oaoer con tarns 50% rec11cled material. 30% oostconsumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY OF RENTON SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT -~ii:.!§ . SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITcc:~,~ -~=ic1 ·., ~uo111E LUA-06-017, SM Jnl-_,\~r3,J1ir )__ APPLICATION NO.: DATE RECEIVED: DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: DATE APPROVED: TYPE OF ACTION(S): February 21, 2006 ~ ff-~'/ft/jj, ~lq I -'2-- March 6, 2006 \0~ ---, March 23, 2006 [ X J Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Permit Variance Permit Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, the City of Renton has granted a permit. This action was taken on the following application: APPLICANT: WSDOT PROJECT: Springbrook Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION: The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is requesting Shoreline Substantial Development Permit approval for the development of the Springbrook Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank (Springbrook Bank) by re-establishing, rehabilitating, enhancing, and preserving 131.54 acres of wetland and riparian area. The proposed bank will increase overall wetland area, hydrologic functions, water quality functions, habitat functions, and provide passive environmental education opportunities. The purpose of the Bank is to provide compensatory mitigation in advance of unavoidable impacts to wetlands and other aquatic resources from future projects within portions of the Cedar-Sammamish Watershed and the Green-Duamish Watershed. The Springbrook Bank is composed of 5 sites, labeled Units A through E (see attached description). Construction of the Springbrook Bank would include extensive site grading on Units C and E; breaching the existing earthen berms adjacent to Springbrook Creek on Units A, B, and E; removal and control of invasive reed canary grass in Units A, B, and C; constructing an elevated boardwalk trail on Unit A; installing habitat structures; and planting native woody vegetation on all units. This work is intended to enhance a broad range of ecological functions to improve wetland habitat, water quality, and hydrologic functions. Units A, B, C, and E are identified on the City's Shoreline Boundary Map as containing wetlands that are State Shorelines as they are associated with Springbrook Creek. Unit D does not have wetlands associated with Springbrook Creek, however a portion of the 200-foot Shoreline buffer from Springbrook Creek extends onto the site. Units A, B, and E are classified as Conservancy Shoreline Environments and Units C and D are classified as Urban Shoreline Environments. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEC-TWNP-R: WITHIN SHORELINES OF: APPLICABLE MASTER PROGRAM: See attached 24-23N-4E, 19-23N-5E & 25-23N-4E Springbrook Creek and it's associated wetlands City of Renton The following section/page of the Master Program is applicable to the development: LUA06-017shoreline.doc CITY OF RENTON SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION NO.: DATE RECEIVED: DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: DATE APPROVED: TYPE OF ACTION(S}: LUA-06-017, SM February 21, 2006 March 6, 2006 March 23, 2006 [X] Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Permit Variance Permit Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, the City of Renton has granted a permit. This action was taken on the following application: APPLICANT: WSDOT PROJECT: Springbrook Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION: The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is requesting Shoreline Substantial Development Permit approval for the development of the Springbrook Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank (Springbrook Bank} by re-establishing, rehabilitating, enhancing, and preserving 131.54 acres of wetland and riparian area. The proposed bank will increase overall wetland area, hydrologic functions, water quality functions, habitat functions, and provide passive environmental education opportunities. The purpose of the Bank is to provide compensatory mitigation in advance of unavoidable impacts to wetlands and other aquatic resources from future projects within portions of the Cedar-Sammamish Watershed and the Green-Duamish Watershed. The Springbrook Bank is composed of 5 sites, labeled Units A through E (see attached description). Construction of the Springbrook Bank would include extensive site grading on Units C and E; breaching the existing earthen berms adjacent to Springbrook Creek on Units A, B, and E; removal and control of invasive reed canary grass in Units A, B, and C; constructing an elevated boardwalk trail on Unit A; installing habitat structures; and planting native woody vegetation on all units. This work is intended to enhance a broad range of ecological functions to improve wetland habitat, water quality, and hydrologic functions. Units A. B, C, and E are identified on the City's Shoreline Boundary Map as containing wetlands that are State Shorelines as they are associated with Springbrook Creek. Unit D does not have wetlands associated with Springbrook Creek, however a portion of the 200-foot Shoreline buffer from Springbrook Creek extends onto the site. Units A, B, and E are classified as Conservancy Shoreline Environments and Units C and D are classified as Urban Shoreline Environments. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEC-TWNP-R: WITHIN SHORELINES OF: APPLICABLE MASTER PROGRAM: See attached 24-23N-4E, 19-23N-5E & 25-23N-4E Springbrook Creek and it's associated wetlands City of Renton The following section/page of the Master Program is applicable to the development: L UA06-017shareline. doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department Springbrook Wetland Mitigation Bank Section 4-3-090.J 4-3-090.1 4-3-090.L 4-3-090.L Descn'ption Urban Environment Conservancy Environment Specific Use Regulations -Stream Alteration Specific Use Regulations -Trails Shvreline Substantial Development Permit Page 2of 2 Page page 3-25 Page 3-24 & 3-25 page 3-36 & 3-37 page 3-37 Development of this project shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with all construction conditions by the State agencies and all construction conditions provided in the application and modifications submitted to the City. This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Action of 1971 and pursuant to the following: 1. The issuance of a license under the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 shall not release the applicant from compliance with federal, state, and other permit requirements. 2. This permit may be rescinded pursuant to Section 14(7) of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 in the event the permittee fails to comply with any condition hereof. 3. A construction permit shall not be issued until twenty-one (21) days after approval by the City of Renton Development Services Division or until any review proceedings initiated within this twenty-one (21) day review period have been completed. cc: Attorney General's Office Applicant / Owners Yellow File LUA06-017shoreline.doc date City of Re ... on Department of Planning I Building I Public •• c, KS ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ipQ,(irS.. COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 20, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-017, SM DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 6, 2006 APPLICANT: Allison Rav -WSDOT PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dina PROJECT TITLE: Sorinabrook Creek Wetland Mitiaation Bank PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 131.5 acres BUILDING AREA laross): N/A LOCATION: South of SW 27'h St & west of Lind Ave SW WORK ORDER NO: 77551 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Construction of a Wetland Mitigation Bank on 6 parcels totalling 131.5 acres in area. The proposed bank is identified as 5 units (Unit A, Unit B. Unit C, Unit D, and Unit E). The project area is located within the Resource Conservation (RC) and Industrial Medium (IM) zoning desigations. Eight large wetlands totaling approximately 89 acres exist on the subject site and Springbrook flows through portions of the site bordering portions of Units A. B, and E. The proposed project would involve the creation, restoration, and enhancement of wetland areas as mitigation for impacts to wetlands created through the construction of transportation projects by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). A SEPA Determination of Non-Significance was previously issued by WSDOT December 22, 2005 and a Notice of Action Taken was issued January 10, 2006. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minar Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housinn Air Aesthetics Water Liaht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shorehne Use Utilities Animals Transnorlation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Natural Resources Historic/Cultural Preservation Airporl Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ::ilu/1,,L (~/0Q -{/J·r)F?c:~ ~ /~v7_.?.5; We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is neede. properly assess.,this proposal l. Signature o Date r I City o nton Department of Planning I Building I Pub , 'arks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Attn Re;l'r~ .. J COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 20, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-017, SM DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 6, 2006 APPLICANT: Allison Rav -WSDOT PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dina ' ' " PROJECT TITLE: Sprinqbrook Creek Wetland Mitiaation Bank PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson RECEIVEn SITE AREA: 131.5 acres BUILDING AREA (aross): N/A . ~uuu LOCATION: South of SW 27'" St & west of Lind Ave SW WORK ORDER NO: 77551 -· - SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Construction of a Wetland M1t1gat1on Bank on 6 parcels totalling 131.5 acres in area. 0 o/~§1f;!%osed bank is identified as 5 units (Unit A, Unit B, Unit C, Unit D, and Unit E). The project area is located within the Resource Conservation (RC) and Industrial Medium (IM) zoning desigations. Eight large wetlands totaling approximately 89 acres exist on the subject site and Springbrook flows through portions of the site bordering portions of Units A, B, and E. The proposed project would involve the creation, restoration, and enhancement of wetland areas as mitigation for impacts to wetlands created through the construction of transportation projects by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). A SEPA Determination of Non-Significance was previously issued by WSDOT December 22, 2005 and a Notice of Action Taken was issued Januany 10, 2006. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Linht!G/are Planls Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas 1n which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio , ormation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Date City o nton Department of Planning I Building I Pub _ 'orks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 20, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUAOB-017, SM DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 6, 2006 APPLICANT: Allison Ra -WSDOT PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Din PROJECT TITLE: S rin brook Creek Wetland Miti ation Bank PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 131_5 acres BUILDING AREA ross : N/A LOCATION: South of SW 27'" St & west of Lind Ave SW WORK ORDER NO: 77551 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Construction of a Wetland Mitigation Bank on 6 parcels totalling 131.5 acres in area. The proposed bank is identified as 5 units (Unit A, Unit B, Unit C, Unit D, and Unit E). The project area is located within the Resource Conservation (RC) and Industrial Medium (IM) zoning desigations. Eight large wetlands totaling approximately 89 acres exist on the subject site and Springbrook fiows through portions of the site bordering portions of Units A, B, and E. The proposed project would involve the creation, restoration, and enhancement of wetland areas as mitigation for impacts to wetlands created through the construction of transportation projects by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). A SEPA Determination of Non-Significance was previously issued by WSDOT December 22, 2005 and a Notice of Action Taken was issued January 10, 2006. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Eat1h Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POL/CY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Probable Environment Minor Impacts Housinn Aesthetics LinhtJG/are Recreation Utilities Transnortation Public Services HistoridCultural PreseNation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet -n ,/4' (~, Probable More Major Information Impacts Necessary We have reviewed this application with parlicular attention to those areas in which we have experlise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addition tion is needed to properly assess this proposal. City o , n.-.. Department of Planning I Building I Pub .~ ENVIRONMENTAL &,DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 20, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-017, SM DATE CIRCULATED: MARC}l-a; 6 APPLICANT: Allison Ra -WSDOT PROJECT MANA PROJECT TITLE: S rin brook Creek Wetland Miti ation Bank PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 131.5 acres BUILDING AREA ross : NIA LOCATION: South of SW 2i" St & west of Lind Ave SW WORK ORDER NO: 77551 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Construction of a Wetland Mitigation Bank on 6 parcels totalling 131.5 acres in area. The proposed bank is identified as 5 units (Unit A, Unit B, Unit C, Unit D, and Unit E). The project area is located within the Resource Conservation (RC) and Industrial Medium (IM) zoning desigations. Eight large wetlands totaling approximately 89 acres exist on the subject site and Springbrook flows through portions of the site bordering portions of Units A, B, and E. The proposed project would involve the creation, restoration, and enhancement of wetland areas as mitigation for impacts to wetlands created through the construction of transportation projects by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). A SEPA Determination of Non-Significance was previously issued by WSDOT December 22, 2005 and a Notice of Action Taken was issued January 10, 2006. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Ea1th Housina Air Aesthetics Water Liahl/Gfare Plants Recreation Lancf!Slloreline Use Utilities Animals Transoorlation Environmental Hea//11 Public Services Energy/ Natural Resources Historic/Cultural Preservation Airporl Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a iti I information is needed to properly assess this proposal. I Date City of Re, .• _n Department of Planning I Building I Public vL ... s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: £rNS'P COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 20, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-017, SM DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 6, 2006 APPLICANT: Allison Rav -WSDOT PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dino PROJECT TITLE: Sorinobrook Creek Wetland Mitioation Bank PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITEAREA: 131.5acres BUILDING AREA lnrossl: NIA LOCATION: South of SW 27'h St & west of Lind Ave SW WORK ORDER NO: 77551 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Construction of a Wetland Mitigation Bank on 6 parcels totalling 131.5 acres in area. The proposed bank is identified as 5 units (Unit A, Unit B, Unit C, Unit D, and Unit E). The project area is located within the Resource Conservation (RC) and Industrial Medium (IM) zoning desigations. Eight large wetlands totaling approximately 89 acres exist on the subject site and Springbrook flows through portions of the site bordering portions of Units A, B, and E. The proposed project would involve the creation, restoration, and enhancement of wetland areas as mitigation for impacts to wetlands created through the construction of transportation projects by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). A SEPA Determination of Non-Significance was previously issued by WSDOT December 22, 2005 and a Notice of Action Taken was issued January 10, 2006. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Un ht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnortalion Environmental Health Public Services Energy! Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 8. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /IA r./ 3)c)/(Y, Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City o Department of Planning I Building I Pub s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'Pr, ~ ~. I .:5\/C'). COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 20, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-017. SM• -._J DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 6, 2006 -- APPLICANT: Allison Ray -WSDOT PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dina 1 •-vt;f V C:U PROJECT TITLE: SprinQbrook Creek Wetland MitiQation Bank PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson MAR ll 7 ?nnc SITE AREA: 131.5 acres BUILDING AREA laross\: N/A -- LOCATION: South of SW 27'" St & west of Lind Ave SW WORK ORDER NO: 77551 UTILITY SYSTEMS SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Construction of a Wetland Mitigation Bank on 6 parcels totalling 131.5 acres in area. The proposed bank is identified as 5 units (Unit A. Unit B, Unit C, Unit D, and Unit E). The project area is located within the Resource Conservation (RC) and Industrial Medium (IM) zoning desigations. Eight large wetlands totaling approximately 89 acres exist on the subject site and Springbrook flows through portions of the site bordering portions of Units A. B. and E. The proposed project would involve the creation, restoration, and enhancement of wetland areas as mitigation for impacts to wetlands created through the construction of transportation projects by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). A SEPA Determination of Non-Significance was previously issued by WSDOT December 22, 2005 and a Notice of Action Taken was issued January 10, 2006. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable Environment Minor Major Impacts Impacts Earth Air Water Plants Land!S/10reline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy! Natural Resources 8. POL/CY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS \ ,/ I I\ [ ,s,. er /, ___ I.('_/ ) More lnforma tion Necessary .~ ...... r·/ -.,\ '·-):; I ' _: ! ', _J (j Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Housina Aesthetics Liaht!Glare Recreation Utilities Transoortation Public Services HistondCullural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feef City o n Department of Planning I Building I Pu/ -· .. s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET APPLICATION NO: LUA06-017, SM DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 6, 2006 APPLICANT: Allison Ray -WSDOT PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Din PROJECT TITLE: S rin brook Creek Wetland Miti ation Bank PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 131.5 acres BUILDING AREA ross : N/A LOCATION: South of SW 27th St & west of Lind Ave SW I WORK ORDER NO: 77551 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Construction of a Wetland Mitigation Bank on 6 parcels totalling 131.5 acres in area. The proposed bank is identified as 5 units (Unit A, Unit B, Unit C, Unit D, and Unit E). The project area is located within the Resource Conservation (RC) and Industrial Medium (IM) zoning desigations. Eight large wetlands totaling approximately 89 acres exist on the subject site and Springbrook flows through portions of the site bordering portions of Units A, B, and E. The proposed project would involve the creation, restoration, and enhancement of wetland areas as mitigation for impacts to wetlands created through the construction of transportation projects by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). A SEPA Determination of Non-Significance was previously issued by WSDOT December 22, 2005 and a Notice of Action Taken was issued January 10, 2006. A. ENV/RONMENTALJMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable Mare Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earlh Housina Air Aesthetics Water Liaht!Gfare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnorlation Environmental Health Public Services Energy! Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airporl Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City o .... nton Department of Planning I Building I Pub .. c . .'arks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: h ~ COMMENTS DUE: MAf«,H-20; 2006 --·--. APPLICATION NO: LUA06-017, SM DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH p, 2llQ6 APPLICANT: Allison Ray -WSDOT PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dinq PROJECT TITLE: Sprinqbrook Creek Wetland Mitiqation Bank PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson. 1.:/\P, -6 2006 SITE AREA: 131.5 acres BUILDING AREA loross):: NIA " '' \ ·- LOCATION: South of SW 27th St & west of Lind Ave SW WORK ORDER NO: 77551 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Construction of a Wetland Mitigation Bank on 6 parcels totalling 131.5 acres in area. The proposed bank is identified as 5 units (Unit A, Unit B, Unit C, Unit D, and Unit E). The project area is located within the Resource Conservation (RC) and Industrial Medium (IM) zoning desigations. Eight large wetlands totaling approximately 89 acres exist on the subject site and Springbrook flows through portions of the site bordering portions of Units A, B, and E. The proposed project would involve the creation, restoration, and enhancement of wetland areas as mitigation for impacts to wetlands created through the construction of transportation projects by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). A SEPA Determination of Non-Significance was previously issued by WSDOT December 22, 2005 and a Notice of Action Taken was issued January 10, 2006. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary E.arth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Liaht/G/are Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistaridCullural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet !-IA I, - B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS }Jf C. CODE-RELA ;~') COMMENTS -f i)0 ~\,u G,VJN1ls We have reviewed his application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additi al information is ded to properly assess this proposal. Date City of ton Department of Planning I Building I Pub/, ,rks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ('x_, L~-(f)r\ COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 20, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-017, SM DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 6, 2006 APPLICANT: Allison Rav -WSDOT PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dina VII l , - PROJECT TITLE: Sprinqbrook Creek Wetland Mitiqation Bank PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson HECEIVED SITE AREA: 131.5 acres BUILDING AREA lnross\: NIA LOCATION: South of SW 27'" St & west of Lind Ave SW WORK ORDER NO: 77551 - , ............ 1v,u1u1-. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Construction of a Wetland Mitigation Bank on 6 parcels totalling 131.5 acres in area. The proposed bank is identified as 5 units (Unit A, Unit B, Unit C, Unit D, and Unit E). The project area is located within the Resource Conservation (RC) and Industrial Medium (IM) zoning desigations. Eight large wetlands totaling approximately 89 acres exist on the subject site and Springbrook flows through portions of the site bordering portions of Units A, 8, and E. The proposed project would involve the creation, restoration, and enhancement of wetland areas as mitigation for impacts to wetlands created through the construction of transportation projects by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). A SEPA Determination of Non-Significance was previously issued by WSDOT December 22, 2005 and a Notice of Action Taken was issued January 10, 2006. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable Moro Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housino Air Aesthetics Water UohVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Ammals Transoortation Environmental Heal/h Public Services Energy! Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Prese,vation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 8. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have revie ed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have experlise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where 'dd1t1onal mtprmat,on 1~ needed to properly assess /!us proposcJ! /l.Ju/Jcwz. - Signature of Director or Authorized Re esentative A Master Application lias bffn filed and accepted wrth 111e 0,e.._1opmen1 Services Division of~ City of Renton. The foHowin51 briefly describl!s the application and the necessuy Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUM8ER: Spr,ngbrook Creek Wetland Mtigation Bank I LUA00-017, SM PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construcllon uf a Wetland Mr1igalion Bank on 6 parcels lo1amng 131 5 acres 0\ area The proposed bank is Klent1hed as 5 unit, (Un~ A, Unit B, Un~ C, Un~ 0, and Un~ E). The projed area is localed w~hin the Resource Conservalion (RCJ and lnd<Jslnal Medium (IM) zoning desrgalions E,ght large wetfands total1r,g approximalely 89 acres exist on the subjcc1 s11~ and Springbrook llows through portions ot the sr1e bordertng por1ions of Unrts A. B, and E The proposed pro1cct wnula rnvolve the creatjon. restoraHon. and enhancement of wetland areas as mrtigation for i'Tlpacts lo wetlands r;reJted lhmugh U1e ~onslruction of transporta1ion projects by the Washington State Depar1ment of Transportation (WSDOTl A SEf'"-Delermination of Non-Significance was preWJ1Js/y issued by WSDOT December 22, 2005 and a Notice o1 Action Taken W3~ issued January 10, 2006. PROJECT LOCATION: PUBLIC APPROVALS: South ol SW 27"' Stree1 & west of Lind Awnue SW Shoreline Subs1a11t1al ~velopment Perm~ APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON. Terry Drochak. WSDOT; Tel· (206) 456-8595; Ernl terry ~rochak@i405.wsdot wa.go~ Comments on the abci~• application must be submitted in writing lo Jill Oing, Associate Planner, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. WA 9B055, by 5:00 PM on March 20, %006. If you hew questoons abou1 this proposal. or w,sh lo be made a party of record and receive addttlonal not•fica1ion by mad. contact the Projed Mana.,er at (425) 430.7219. Anyone who sutm,~s written comments will automatically become a par1y of record and wiN ba notified of any decision on this projec1 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: \ I February 21, 2006 March 6, 2006 March 6, 2006 \ PROJECT LOCATION II ;-A I C E /' \ If )'QU would like lo be made a party or record 10 ,ece,ve further mronnalion on 1his proposed ~oject. complete th',s form and return lo: Cty ol Renton. Development Plann,ng. 1055 South Grady Way. Ren1on. WA 98055. FIie Name I No Spnngb(Uok Creek Well3n~ Mtigat1on Bank I LUA00-017, SM NAME MAILING ADDRESS ----- TELEPHONE NO CERTIFICATION I, ,~, // 1)1 ~ , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were po~ted by me _3_ conspicuous places or nearby the descnbed property on DATE: Z.,/1, /Q(r,, I I A TIEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Puhlic, in and fort ate of Washington residing in , on the _/,__ day of \ l"l , I C \:"\ CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 5th day of March, 2006, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter & NOA documents. This information was sent to: Name Allison Ray, WSDOT Terry Drochack Surrounding Property Owners -NOA only (Signature of Sender):~~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) Applicant Contact See attached I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker Representing signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the u~~'ill\~111 purposes mentioned in the instrument. ~.::-.J,o'~ ~:,~~ ,.J}J,11 -~-.\ .. ' I QA, lt17'4t-_l11 ' I . --\!-' ,,. ~ ~· 'l Dated:_:,,h IPL ~ '"l ._, 'd \-,c ~a," f ff~ or-1 ,'\1:;\ Notary Public in and for th tate of Wfsh~ton. • _ .,:\iJ Notary (Print): My appointment expires: ;,ii'. ui,~ ... , · · \ --~ "'v c., ff E Pwv":::n: c L '( n n :l:\1:\\ 1-r<' I'.:\ ~,.N ,:~:e .. .,..fJ:E ,,, oJ:.."''"'Y,.."'''~'.6A.;,,~ 1111 WAsl-\\1';;:..i,,"' ''""""''" Project Name: Springbrook Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank Project Number: LUA06-017, SM • • 125381027007 ADVENTURE 95 LIMITED PTNRSH 299 SW 27TH ST RENTON WA 98055 088670040000 BOEING COMPANY THE 100 N RIVERSIDE M/C 5003-4027 CHICAGO IL 60606 125379001097 DIRECTOR OF REAL ESTATE PUGET SOUND BLOOD CENTER 921 TERRY AV SEATILE WA 98104 125381026009 GK SERVICES CO ATIN: TAX DEPT 5995 OPUS PKWY #500 MINNETONKA MN 55343 125380012000 PIETROMONACO I L L C PO BOX 700 MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 302305910002 TOSCO CORP C/0 CONOCOPHILLIPS PO BOX 1539 PASO ROBLES CA 9344 7 125381005508 BEDFORD PROPERTY INVESTORS ATIN BEVERLY NILSON 270 LAFAYETIE CIR LAFAYETIE CA 94549 630850010004 CALSMART LLC 6759 SIERRA CT SUITE E DUBLIN CA 94568 252304905307 r,'-',1'\'{)\"Ct1 r,J0r1Lnci!n DRAINAGE DIST 1 ',\ t\(l C/0 JOHN NELSON 601 WEST GOWE KENT WA 98033 125381014088 OAKESDALE COMMERCE CTR BSP ALSO 125381-0130 2006 ADV DEP PD $36,487.85 2007 PLAT NEW MAJOR 630849 00000 362304903507 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 90868 BELLEVUE WA 98009 362304903408 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO PROPERTY TAX 1400 DOUGLAS STOP 1640 OMAHA NE 68179 125381031009 BNSF RWY CO PO BOX 961089 FORT WORTH TX 76161 252304900605 CITY OF TUKWILA ATIN: ALAN DOERSHEL 6200 SOUTHCENTER BL TUKWILA WA 98188 362304910403 DRAINAGE DISTRICT 1 PO BOX 297 KENT WA 98032 125381006001 OGIMA LL C C/0 TRIMLITE INC 901 SW 39TH ST RENTON WA 98055 088670033005 THE FEDERAL RESERVE BK SAN 101 MARKET ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105 362304911104 ZELMAN RENTON LLC 515 S FIGUEROA ST #1230 LOS ANGELES CA 90071 A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Springbrook Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank/ LUA06-017, SM PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construction of a Wetland Mitigation Bank on 6 parcels totalling 131.5 acres in area. The proposed bank is identified as 5 units (Unit A, Unit B, Unit C, Unit D, and Unit E). The project area is located within the Resource Conservation (RC) and Industrial Medium (IM) zoning desigations. Eight large wetlands totaling approximately 89 acres exist on the subject site and Springbrook flows through portions of the site bordering portions of Units A, B, and E. The proposed project would involve the creation, restoration, and enhancement of wetland areas as mitigation for impacts to wetlands created through the construction of transportation projects by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). A SEPA Determination of Non-Significance was previously issued by WSDOT December 22, 2005 and a Notice of Action Taken was issued January 10, 2006. PROJECT LOCATION: PUBLIC APPROVALS: South of SW 2?1h Street & west of Lind Avenue SW Shoreline Substantial Development Permit APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Terry Drochak, WSDOT; Tel: (206) 456-8595; Em!: terry.drochak@i405.wsdot.wa.gov Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jill Ding, Associate Planner, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on March 20, 2006. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager at (425) 430-7219. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION; February 21, 2006 March 6, 2006 March 6, 2006 PROJECT LOC~ TION C BJ A) • <·_'.. -~-, ~ROJEC.l - ,,, LOCATION : -f. If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project. complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. File Name/ No.. Springbrook Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank/ LUA06-017, SM NAME: ------------------------------------- MAILING ADDRESS: _____________________________ ~ TELEPHONE NO.: --------------- CITY .F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator March 6, 2006 Terry Drochak WSDOT -1-405 Project 600 1081h Avenue NE #405 Bellevue, WA 98004 Subject: Springbrook Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank LUA06-017, SM Dear Mr. Drochak: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. You will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7219 if you have any questions. Sincerely, r..., ~/ '/7- rl, ~~ '/ u· MillK.Ding Associate Planner cc: Allison Ray, WSDOT / Applicant -------l-0-55-So_u_th_G_r-ad_y_W-ay---R-e_n_to-n,-W-as-h-in_gt_o_n_9_80_5_5 _______ ~ ~ This oaoer contc1ins 50% rm::vr:100 material :\0% ~t ,.11m;11mP-r AHEAD OF THF. CURVE City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: City of Renton PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Springbrook ADDRESS: 1055 S. Grady Way Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Project CITY: Renton ZIP: PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 98055 The proposed Springbrook Bank site consists of TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-430-7321 five land parcels (Units A through E), totaling APPLICANT (if other than owner) 131.54 acres. The Springbrook Bank site is located south of SW 27th Street and west of Lind Avenue SW in the City of Renton. NAME: Allison Ray KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER($): COMPANY (if applicable): Washington State Dept. of Transportation Unit A: 125381-0090 Unit B: 252304-9004 (NE portion), 125381-0170, ADDRESS: 1-405 Project Office and 125381-0230 600 108th Ave NE, Suite 405 Unit C: 252304-9004 (portion located west of Oakesdale Avenue SW) and 252304-9019 CITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98004 Unit D: 362304-9002 (northerly 600 feet) UnitE: 125381-0240 TELEPHONE NUMBER 425-456-8610 EXISTING LAND USE(S): Undeveloped land CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED LAND USE(S): The proposed project NAME: Terry Drochak focuses on improving wetland area and function and riparian functions near Springbrook Creek. COMPANY (if applicable): Washington State Dept. of Transportation EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Employment Area Valley ADDRESS: 1-405 Project Office 600 108th Ave NE, Suite 405 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: N/A CITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98004 EXISTING ZONING: TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: 206-456- 8595; terrJ1.drochak@i405.wsdot.wa.gov Units A. B. C. and E: Resource Conservation (RC) Unit D: Industrial Medium (IM) PROPOSED ZONING (if annlicable): N/A SITE AREA (in square feet): 5.729,905 square feet SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING THREE LOTS OR MORE (if applicable): N/A Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/planning/masterapp.doc 02/15/06 PRI :CT INFORMATION (contin i) PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): N/ A NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if annlicable): N/A NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if annlicable): N/A NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if aoolicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if aoolicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if aoolicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if aoolicable): N/A NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if aoolicable): N/A NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if aoolicable): N/A PROJECT VALUE: N/A IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): D AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE D AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO IZl FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. D GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. D HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. IZl SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. IZl WETLANDS 88.2 acres Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/planning/masterapp.doc 02/l5/06 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY I Attach leaal descriotion on seoarate sheet with the followina information included) All units are located in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. Section, Township, and Range for each unit is shown below. Unit A: Section 30, Township 23N, Range 5E Unit B: Section 25, Township 23N, Range 4E Unit C: Section 25, Township 23N, Range 4E Unit D: Section 36, Township 23N, Range 4E Unit E: Section 25, Township 23N, Range 4E TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Shoreline Substantial Development Use 3. Permit 2. Critical Areas Ordinance Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) Allison Ray, declare that I am (please check one) the current owner of the property involved in this application or X the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. (Signature of Owner/Representative (Signature of Owner/Representative) Q:wcb/pw/devserv/forms/p\anning/masterapp.doc I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that A::l l 1· S,OV\ Da, h ~ ~0-1. signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for thl:1 uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) My appointment expires: ~\ \ do-, d-C)C)"j 02/15/06 OE\/"1 0"11" >:i•v .· ~NT Pi.ANNING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION . ' . clF RENTON WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FEB 21 20a6 FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS RECEIVED LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: . REQUIREMENTS: BY: BY:---= . · . Calculations, Colored Maps for Display 4 . • u b1-. ... . . Construction Mitigation Description zAND4 Deed of Right-of-Way Dedication, Ci~ Density Worksheet 4 Drainage Control Plan, . \73 • -~I'.) OJJI...\/ 1(,;:_\.t aiw niil/\ c,\L J Drainage Report, Jt_; \ ) . . . . .. \ .. ,· Elevations, ArchitecturahANo• . 0b-. ... ... Environmental Checklist, ,\'I) h 1\)2) • (YO ,SI' i,.,,., I .//,, ,V ' s-k 1'0 Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy), ···,·.·. : . : . . .. . . , ..... Existing Easements (Recorded Copy)• Flood Hazard Data, . . . Floor Plans s AND ,4 dll . . . . .: ' . . · ... ,. Geotechmcaf Report>ANo.3 . .. ..... Grading Plan, Conceptual, . Grading Plan, Detailed, . ,·: . .. • ..... Habitat Data Report 4 ~.u Cc,n_f.,,,:-n <? • ..D wl,·n 1s ' Ass~ C \ . 1,..../09 i"co.. Improvement Deferral, . V ':: (B 4) .. .. Irrigation Plan 4 King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site, ..... -_-:.-: ...... . .... . .. . . ... .... . Landscape Plan, Conceptual, I )rlJ r-orks.d-CG '1;;i ,d I J {\~'-"" o-f,,, , Landscape Plan, Detailed, .· ' .. · .. ,·· , . . Legal Description, .. ... . )1 ' .. . List of Surrounding Property Owners, . .. ( e--7'-·-. .. . Mailing Labels for Property Owners , ?1 . I\ f~f.--- . Map of Existing Sit<! Conditions, . . • . . . . Master Application Form, Monument Cards (one per monument) 1 . .. .. Neighborhood Detail Map 4 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section ...., I .l/ N,1,·+· 'J.? ~ PROJECT NAME: ~i~J'-f_f~'~l"~i~l"~q4'Y-~1~v~r~,(~l~i'~ .. -~I-' ·~~{..JCv(L ·'-- I G-1 oATE: -'-11 /-'l"""'C'-lf-'-'-'n6,_,_ ____ _ 4. Development Planning Section Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSER\f\Forms\Planning\waiver.xls 11104/2005 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED • COMMENTS: REQUIREMENTS: .. BY: BY: Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis , Plan Reductions (PMTs) , ·. . .:· . . . .. .... : .. · . Plat Name Reservation , Postage, . · .... .. . .. · . •••• .. ·.· .. . . , .. :,<::::'" · .... ..... .:·::. _: ' Preapplication Meeting Summary 4 '{: [) me.e _ _+i''YI,.., S ~n r,1'Y\CI Public Works ApprovalLetter, . •: i• J:_3 \J . \J. i cJ·· ',. _-·.: . . . . Rehabilitation Plan 4 Screening Detail, ... . .. · •••• • ••• ·. .· . · . . .. . . ··.·. ... . .... . ...... Site Plan 2 AND 4 ~ ,l) I?~,, r~c-0 oho,* ( ?,/ Jf;__ .x II S!rearJl or-L.ake _Stu<ly,stand_ard 4 ···:.· :: ·. •::• . :_ -:: ..... .... . ..... . . ··-. :-.·-. ::· .: Stream or Lake Study, Supplemental 4 Stream or Lake Mitigation Pian , .. .. · . ··· . .. ••••••• ... . . . ... Street Profiles 2 Title Report or Pfat CertifiCate , _··,:: ····.·.·· =._ .· ... · .. .· · . . . ..... . .·· Topography Map, Traffic Study 2 •••·· . .:··.v . . ... •:·· .... ·.·: ., ' -·· Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan 4 Urban tenter t>i,iign 6v~~ay DlstrictRepprt •••• •• ... .. . .. . ·· . ..... .···· .. ·.· • .. .. . ....... · :::, Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 ).?3 p., '/, ~ I\ NIL-- Wetlands MitfgatiOl'l F'l~h. Final 4 •·. i>. ·· ... ··· . ·:··· ... .· .. • ••• .... . ..... ····· ... .... . ... .... ···:::::.· : : ... Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary 4 Wetlands Reportibeiirieafion , .. -· :_.-•• ·. ·:·::·_I· .. ... • • •• . .... ... . .. Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND, Inventory of Existing Sites ,AND, Lease Agreement, Draft , AND, Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND, Map of View Area 2 AND, Photosimulations 2 AND, This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Development Planning Section Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Forms\Planning\waiver.xls 11/04/2005 SEPA-NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN or, ltE'·"'o IN/NG _1 .. 1 N FEB 2 1 2006 RECEIVED Notice is given under SEPA, RCW 43.21 C.080, that the Washington State Department of Transportation took the action described in (2) below on January 10, 2006. I. Any action to set aside, enjoin, review, or otherwise challenge such action on the grounds of noncompliance with the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW (State Environmental Policy Act) shall be commenced on or before January 31, 2006. 2. Description of Agency Action: Design approval of the project entitled: Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank (Springbrook Bank). 3. Description of Proposal: Washington State Department ofTransportatwn (WSDOT) and the City of Renton, in partnership, are developing the Springbrook Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank (Springbrook Bank) by re-establishing, rehabilitating, enhancing, and preserving 131.54 acres of wetland and riparian area located in the southwest portion of the Renton, Washington. The Springbrook Bank will increase wetland area, hydrologic functions, water quality functions, habitat functions and provide passive environmental education opportunities. The Springbrook Bank is located in the Lower Green River Basin within Water Resource Inventory Area 9 (WRIA 9). The purpose of the Springbrook Bank is to provide compensatory mitigation in advance of unavoidable impacts to wetlands and other aquatic resources from future projects within portions of the Cedar-Sammamish Watershed (WRIA 8) and Green-Duwamish Watershed (WRIA 9). The Springbrook Bank is made up of five parcels, called Units A through E, described below. Construction work includes extensive site grading on Units C and E; breaching the existing earthen berms adjacent to Springbrook Creek on Units A B, and E; removal and control of invasive reed canarygrass in Units A, B, and C; constructing an elevated boardwalk trail on Unit A; installing habitat structures; and planting native woody vegetation on all units. This work will enhance a broad range of ecological functions to improve wetland habitat, water quality, and hydrologic functions. 4. Location of Proposal: The proposed Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank (Springbrook Bank) site consists of five land parcels (Units A through E), totaling 131.54 acres. The Springbrook Bank site is located south of SW 27th Street and west of Lind Avenue SW in the City of Renton. Specific locations are as follows: - • Unit A is located immediately south of SW 27th Street, immediately north of developed commercial shipping/warehouse facilities, immediately west of Lind Avenue, and immediately east of and adjacent to Springbrook Creek. The undeveloped site covers 26.33 acres. • Unit B is located immediately south of SW 27th Street, immediately north of developed commercial shipping/warehouse facilities, immediately west of and adjacent to Springbrook "2'1 Waahlngton Stat. .... .,. De..-,tment of Transponatlon IOllililHliW U Congestion Relief & Bus Rapid Transit Projects Creek, and immediately east of Oakesdale Avenue SW. The undeveloped site covers 36.49 acres. Unit C is located immediately south of undeveloped land, immediately north of a developed industrial shipping/railroad facility and undeveloped land, immediately west of Oakesdale Avenue SW, and immediately east of an active Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad right-of-way. The undeveloped site covers 47.90 acres. • Unit Dis located immediately south of undeveloped land, immediately north of SW 43rd Street, immediately east of an active BNSF Railroad right-of-way, and immediately west of a developed commercial shipping/warehouse facility. The undeveloped site covers 5.60 acres. • Unit Eis located immediately south of developed commercial shipping/warehouse facilities, immediately north and west and adjacent to Springbrook Creek, and immediately east of Oakesdale Avenue SW. The undeveloped site covers 15.22 acres. 5. Type of Environmental Review under SEPA: SEPA Environmental Checklist. SEPA Environmental Checklist was approved by WSDOT on December 22, 2005. SEPA Decision (Determination of Non-Significance) was adopted by WSDOT on January 10, 2006. 6. Project documents may be examined during regular business hours at: WSDOT 1-405 Project Office, 600 108th Avenue NE, Bellevue WA, 98005, 425-456-8610 7. Name of Agency Giving Notice: Washington State Department of Transportation. 8. This notice is filed by: -"'/JI' Wuhlngton State •", O.partment of Transportation Allison Ray 1-405 Environmental Manager Corridor Program U Congestion Relief & Bus Rapid Transit Projects WAC 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS). FEB 2 I 2006 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE RECEIVED Description of proposal: Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and the City of Renton, in partnership, are developing the Springbrook Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank (Springbrook Bank) by re- establishing, rehabilitating, enhancing, and preserving 131.54 acres of wetland and riparian area located in the southwest portion of the Renton, Washington. The Springbrook Bank will increase wetland area, hydrologic functions, water quality functions, habitat functions and provide passive environmental education opportunities. The Springbrook Bank is located in the Lower Green River Basin within Water Resource Inventory Area 9 (WRIA 9). The purpose of the Springbrook Bank is to provide compensatory mitigation in advance of unavoidable impacts to wetlands and other aquatic resources from future projects within portions of the Cedar-Sammamish Watershed (WRlA 8) and Green-Duwamish Watershed (WRIA 9). The Springbrook Bank is made up of five parcels, called Units A through E, described below. Construction work includes extensive site grading on Units C and E; breaching the existing earthen berms adjacent to Springbrook Creek on Units A, B, and E; removal and control of invasive reed canarygrass in Units A, B, and C; constructing an elevated boardwalk trail on Unit A; installing habitat structures; and planting native woody vegetation on all units. This work will enhance a broad range of ecological functions to improve wetland habitat, water quality, and hydrologic functions. Proponent: WSDOT, l-405 Project Office The proposed Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank (Springbrook Bank) site consists of five land parcels (Units A through E), totaling 131.54 acres. The Springbrook Bank site is located south of SW 27th Street and west of Lind Avenue SW in the City of Renton. Specific locations are as follows: • Unit A is located immediately south of SW 27th Street, immediately north of developed commercial shipping/warehouse facilities, immediately west of Lind Avenue, and immediately east of and adjacent to Springbrook Creek. The undeveloped site covers 26.33 acres. Unit B is located immediately south of SW 27th Street, immediately north of developed commercial shipping/warehouse facilities, immediately west of and adjacent to Springbrook Creek, and immediately east of Oakesdale Avenue SW. The undeveloped site covers 36.49 acres. • Unit C is located immediately south ofundeveloped land, immediately north ofa developed industrial shipping/railroad facility and undeveloped land, immediately west of Oakesdale Avenue SW, and immediately east of an active Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad right-of-way. The undeveloped site covers 47.90 acres. Unit D is located immediately south of undeveloped land, immediately north of SW 43rd Street, immediately east of an active BNSF Railroad right-of-way, and immediately west of a developed commercial shipping/warehouse facility. The undeveloped site covers 5.60 acres. • Unit E is located immediately south of developed commercial shipping/warehouse facilities, immediately north and west and adjacent to Springbrook Creek, and immediately east of Oakesdale Avenue SW. The undeveloped site covers 15.22 acres. Lead agency: WSDOT The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2)(c). This decision was made after review ofa completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This infomrntion is available to the public on request. -;;,= Wuhlngtan Stat• Y/1 D..-rtm•nt of Transportatkin 0 There is no comment period for this DNS. 0 This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. There is no further comment period on the DNS. li!I This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by January 9, 2006. Responsible official: Allison Ray, WSDOT Position/title: 1-405 Environmental Manager Interstate 405 (1-405) Congestion Relief and Bus Rapid Transit Projects Phone.: (425) 456-8610 Address: 1-405 Project Office, 600 108~5, Bellevue, Washington, 98004 Date: December22,2005 Signature ~ ~ -;,: WHhlngton State T/# D•partment of Transportation 0F.Vt~/C)i:?..'/,... '. :: n,, ~ ... f::II./T t"LA At ment 4 -Project NarratiYe',.;:-f?F:Arro~tJING . EB 2 1 2006 1 1NTR0DucT10N R1:c1:,Vi The Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank (Springbrook Bank) site is ED located in the southwestern portion of the City of Renton, Washington, Sections 25 and 36, Township 23N, Range 4E; and Section 30, Township 23N, Range 5E. It consists of five units (Units A, B, C, D, and E), totaling 131.54 acres, which represent some of the last remaining large tracts of undeveloped land in the Lower Green River Basin. The King County Soil Survey describes four soil types at the Springbrook Bank site: Puget silty clay loam, Puyallup fine sandy loam, Snohomish silt loam, and Woodinville silt loam. The City of Renton zoning designation for Units A, B, C, and E is Resource Conservation (RC) and for Unit D is Industrial Medium (IM). For locations and zoning designations of properties in the City of Renton, City of Tukwila, and the City of Kent that are adjacent to Springbrook Bank, see Attachment 4A -Springbrook Bank Zoning Map. All areas within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of Springbrook Creek and its associated wetlands are regulated as Shorelines of the State by the City of Renton Shoreline Master Program. According to the City of Renton Shoreline Boundary Map and a previous shoreline exemption issued for this site (LUA-05-066, SME, CAR), Unit A, Unit B, the northeast comer of Unit C, the southeast portion of Unit D that is within 200 feet of Springbrook Creek, and the southeast portion of Unit E that is within 200 feet of Springbrook Creek are within the regulated shoreline boundary. Eight large jurisdictional wetlands totaling approximately 89 acres exist on the site and Springbrook Creek flows through portions of the site bordering portions of Units A, B, and E. Springbrook Creek ultimately flows into the Black River via the Black River Pump Station (BRPS). The BRPS and associated infrastructure prevents high flows in the Green River from backing water up into Springbrook Creek, reducing the risk of flooding in adjacent areas. 2 PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed project focuses on improving wetland area and function and riparian functions near Springbrook Creek. Construction work includes extensive site grading Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank City of Renton Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Page 1 At ment 4 -Project Narrative on Units C and E; breaching the earthen berms adjacent to Springbrook Creek on Units A and B; opening Unit E to flooding from Springbrook Creek; removing and controlling invasive reed canarygrass in Units A, B, C, and E; placing environmentally educational signage on the constructed elevated boardwalk trail on Unit A; and installing habitat structures and planting native woody vegetation in all units. This work will enhance a broad range of ecological functions to improve wetland habitat, water quality, and hydrologic functions. A more detailed description of excavation and fill amounts for each unit within the Springbrook Bank site is provided below in Section 2.1 and Section 2.2. A temporary construction entrance will be installed within each unit and a tire wash area will be installed in Units A, B, C, and E. The construction entrance will be constructed using geotextile fabric topped with asphalt, which will be removed upon completion of construction of the project. T11e tire wash water will be discharged to a Baker tank and then either hauled off site to an approved discharge location or discharged into a sanitary sewer. The exact method of removal will be determined by the contractor. Approximately 1 acre of trees in Unit A and 6 acres of trees in Unit E will be cleared as part of site preparation, grading, and excavation; the cleared trees will be used as habitat structures. The trees, which are primarily cottonwood and alder, will be replaced with native trees and shrubs that match the hydrologic regime specific to that location. The total estimated construction cost and fair market value of the proposed project ranges from $7.5 to $8.5 million. All land within the Springbrook Bank site currently is and will remain under ownership of City of Renton; however, mitigation credits will be shared between the City of Renton and Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation B11Hk City of Renton Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Page 2 At ment 4 -Project Narrative 2.1 Excavation Approximately 583 cubic yards of fill material will be excavated and removed as part of the berm breaches on Units A and B. Approximately 100,000 cubic yards of fill on Unit C and 160,000 cubic yards on Unit E will be excavated and removed to re-establish former wetlands in those units. On Unit D, approximately 21 cubic yards of soil material will be excavated and removed to install the drainage conveyance pipe. Excavation will be required within the OHWM to breach the berms on Unit E, and will be required within wetlands. Tables 1 and 2 detail the volume and area of excavation in these areas. 2.2 Fill Table 1 Volume and Area of Excavation within OHWM Unit • Unit E • Volume (cubic yards) 908 Table 2 Area (acres) 0.32 Volume and Area of Excavation in Existing Wetlands Volume Area Unit (cubic yards) (acres) Unit A 24.5 0.06 Unit B 3.9 0.03 Unit C 7,917 1.75 ......................... Unit D 21 0.09 Fill material will be placed for habitat planting hummocks on Units A and B and soil ditch plugs and the weir structure on Unit C. Table 3 provides a breakdown of the fill amounts for each unit. Table 3 Volume and Area of Fill in Wetlands Volume Unit (cubic yards) Unit A 87.03 Unit B 61.02 Unite 528 Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank City of Renton Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Area (acres) 0.02 0.03 0.26 Page3 At ment 4-Project Narrative As part of the mitigation treatment throughout the bank, woody mulch will be spread over approximately 20 acres to deter weeds. Table 4 provides a breakdown of mulch that will placed in existing wetlands for each unit. Table 4 Volume and Area of Mulch in Wetlands Unit B Unit C 3 LAND USE PERMITS Volume (cubic yards) 3,533 2,159 2,494 Area (acres) 8.8 5.4 6.2 A Shoreline Substantial Development Permit will be required for the project Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank City of Renton Shoreline Substantial Developmenl Permit Page4 ATTACHMENT 4A SPRINGBROOK BANK ZONING MAP Legend D Resource Conservation • Industrial Light D Industrial Medium • Industrial Heavy • Commercial Arterial D Commercial Office • Industrial Park (City of Kent) • Limited Industrial (City of Kent) Commercial/Light • Industrial (City of Tukwila) • Urban Center (City ofTukwila) Springbrook Creek Springbrook Bank Zoning Map ATTACHMENT 4A Washington State Department of Transportation I Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank 'N.\~...,. .;,., ,0':o· "'· . , .• \\ ;~'\ \.·' •,:'(" •. . ''' lo ,1~~ Attachment 5 -Con. .... ~ .1ction Mitigation Description ~~i 'L. ~'v ,'\e'.:,J~ requested in Question 6 of the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SSDP) •. '·' Submittal Requirements list, this Construction Mitigation Description provides a written narrative of the construction timing, as well as measures taken to mitigate construction impacts. Project work will begin during the fall of 2006 and extend through 2008, taking approximately 24 months. The hours of operation for construction will be determined by the contractor. Truck traffic generated during excavation hauling may produce short-term impacts to transportation, Washington State Department of Transportation (WSD01) and the City of Renton are currently developing a haul plan in order to control impacts. This plan will include hours of hauling (to avoid peak traffic times), haul routes (to avoid impacts to traffic and to infrastructure), and traffic control plans (to provide safe access to the sites). If nighttime work is required to accomplish the hauling in the timeframe needed to meet the schedule, noise variances will be obtained. Noise levels are not expected to be significantly greater than normal light-industrial noise that is common in the area. Minimal air quality impacts are anticipated from the engines of equipment during construction. Specific measures to reduce or control noise and emissions will be determined by the contractor. In addition, the contractor will coordinate with the City of Renton as part of the Public Works Construction Permit. Measures will be employed to minimize temporary construction impacts. For a detailed discussion of the measures to be implemented, please see Chapter 2 of the Biological Assessment (Attachment 7 in this SSDP application). Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank City of Renton Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Page 1 AGE\!CY lJSE ONLY Agency Reference#: Circulated by: Date Recei\'ed: (local govt. or agency) RE'CeiV JOINT AQUATIC RESOURCES PERMIT APPLICATION FORM (JARPA) (for use in Washington State) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT IN BLACK INK. TO FILL IN ELECTRONICALLY. USE F11 TO MOVE THROUGH THE FORM D Application for a Fish Habitat Enhancement ProJect per requirements of RCW 77.55.290. You must submit a copy of this completed JARPA application form and the (Fish Habitat Enhancement JARPA Addition) to your local Government Planning Department and Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife Area Habitat Biologist on the same day. NOTE: LOCAL GOVERNMENTS -You must submit any comments on these projects to WDFW within 15 working days. Based on the instructions provided, I am sending copies of this application to the following: (check all that apply) 0 Local Government for shoreline: [R]Substantial Development 0Conditional Use []Variance 0Exemption 0Revision (E]Floodplain Management (E]Critical Areas Ordinance 0 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife for HPA (Submit 3 copies to WDFW Region) 0 Washington Department of Ecology for 401 Water Quality Certification (to Regional Office-Federal Permit Unit) D Washington Department of Natural Resources for Aquatic Resources Use Authorization Notification 0 Corps of Engineers for: 0 Section 404 D Section 1 O permit D Coast Guard for: D General Bridge Act Permit D Private Aids to Navigation (for non-bridge projects) 0 For Department of Transportation projects only: This project will be designed to meet conditions of the most current Ecology/Department of Transportation Water Quality Implementing Agreement SECTION A -Use for all permits covered by this application. Be sure to ALSO complete Section C (Signature Block) for all permit applications. 1. APPLICANT Allison Ray, Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), Interstate 405 (l-405) Congestion Relief and Bus Rapid Transit Projects-Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Project MAILING ADDRESS 1-405 Project Office, 600 108th Avenue NE, Suite 405, Bellevue, Washington, 98004 WORK PHONE I E-MAIL ADDRESS I HOME PHONE lFAX# ( 425) 456-861 0 allison.ray@i405.wsdot.wa.gov ( 425) 456-8600 If an agent is acting for the applicant during the permit process, complete #2. Be sure agent signs Section C (Signature Block) for all permit applications 2. AUTHORIZED AGENT Terry Drochak, Permit Specialist MAILING ADDRESS 1-405 Project Office, 600 108th Avenue NE, Suite 405, Bellevue, Washington, 98004 WORK PHONE I E-MAIL ADDRESS I HOME PHONE I FAX# (425) 456-8595 terry.drochak@i405.wsdot.wa.gov (425) 456-8600 3. Relationship of applicant to property: D OWNER D PURCHASER D LESSEE 0 Other The proposed Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank (Springbrook Bank) is a partnership between the City of Renton and WSDOT. 4. Name, address and phone number of property owner(s) if other than applicant: City of Renton, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. (425) 430-7321 5. Location (street address, including city, county and zip code, where proposed activity exists or will occur) The proposed Springbrook Bank site consists of five land parcels (Units A through E), totaling 131.54 acres. The Springbrook Bank site is located south of SW 27th Street and west of Lind Avenue SW in the City of Renton. See Attachment A-JAR PA Drawings, sheets V1 and T1 _ -- Specific locations are as follows: • Unit A is located immediately south of SW 27th Street, immediately north of developed commercial shipping/warehouse facilities, immediately west of Lind Avenue, and immediately east of and adjacent to Springbrook Creek. The undeveloped site covers 26.33 acres. • Unit B is located immediately south of SW 27th Street, immediately north of developed commercial shipping/warehouse facilities, immediately west of and adjacent to Springbrook Creek, and immediately east of Oakesdale Avenue SW. The undeveloped site covers 36.49 acres. • Unit C is located immediately south of undeveloped land, immediately north of a developed industrial shipping/railroad facility and undeveloped land, immediately west of Oakesdale Avenue SW, and immediately east of an active Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad right-of-way. The undeveloped site covers 47.90 acres. • Unit D is located immediately south of undeveloped land, immediately north of SW 43rd Street, immediately east of an active BNSF Railroad right-of-way, and immediately west of a developed commercial shipping/warehouse facility. The undeveloped site covers 5.60 acres. • Unit E is located immediately south of developed commercial shipping/warehouse facilities, immediately north and west and adjacent to Springbrook Creek, and immediately east of Oakesdale Avenue SW. The undeveloped site covers 15.22 acres. Local government with jurisdiction (city or county): City of Renton Waterbody you are working in: Tributary of: WRIA#: Springbrook Creek Green River 9 Is this waterbody on the 303(d) List** YES 11:J NOD Shoreline designation: If YES, what parameter(s)? Dissolved Oxygen, Fecal Springbrook Creek: Urban Environment Coliform Associated Wetlands: Conservancy Environment **For 303d List, Zoning designation: htt~:l/www.eci.wa.gov/~rograms/wg/303d/index.html Units A, B, C, and E: Resource Conservation (RC) Unit D: Industrial Medium !IM) y. Section Township Range Government Lot Section Unit A: 30 23N SE DNR stream type if known: Unit B: 25 23N 4E Springbrook Creek: DNR Type S Unit C: 25 23N 4E Unit D: 36 23N 4E Unit E: 25 23N 4E Tax Parcel Number: Latitude and Longitude: Unit A: 125381-0090 Unit A: Lat. 47°27'28" Long. -122"13'26" Unit B: 252304-9004 (NE portion), 125381-0170, and 125381- Unit B Lat. 47°27'29" Long. -122"14'10" 0230 Unit C: Lat. 47"27'19" Long. -122°14'24" Unit C: 252304-9004 (portion located west of Oakesdale Unit D: Lat. 47°26'29" Long. -122"14'27" Avenue SW) and 252304-9019 Unit E: Lat. 47°26'49" Long. -122"14'08" Unit D: 362304-9002 (northerly 600 feet) Unit E: 125381-0240 6. Describe the current use of the property, and structures existing on the property. Have you completed any portion of the proposed activity on this property? D YES 11:l NO For any portion of the proposed activity already completed on this property, indicate month and year of completion. The current use of the Springbrook Bank site is undeveloped land. No building structures currently exist on the site. Is the property agricultural land? D YES 11:l NO Are you a USDA program participant? D YES 11:l NO 7a. Describe the proposed work that needs aquatic permits: Complete plans and specifications should be provided for l!l! work waterward of the ordinary high water mark or line, including types of equipment to be used. If applying for a shoreline permit, describe all work within and beyond 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark. If you have provided attached materials to describe your project, you still must summarize the proposed work here. Attach a separate sheet if additional space is needed. The Springbrook Bank project proposes to increase wetland area; improve hydro logic functions, water quality functions, habitat functions, and fish refuge/rearing habitat; and provide passive environmental education opportunities. The Springbrook Bank will re-establish 17.81 acres of wetland, rehabilitate 52.92 acres of wetland, enhance 33.61 acres of wetland, enhance 7.80 acres of upland, and enhance 6 88 acres of riparian upland adjacent to Springbrook Creek. The project also proposes to establish a 40-foot-wide protection setback (buffer) by enhancing 9.86 acres of perimeter area on portions of all units, except Unit D. In addition, the proiect proposes to construct an elevated boardwalk trail across Unit A, thereby connecting the King County regional Interurban Trail to the King County regional Green River Trail. The timing of work elements is described below and in question 8 of this JARPA. See Attachment B Draft Final Mitigation Bank Instrument for a more detailed description of the overall site restoration strategy. Unit A The work elements proposed on Unit A are wetland rehabilitation (20.30 acres), wetland re-establishment (0.05 acre), riparian upland enhancement (0.65 acres), protection setback (buffer) establishment (2.67 acres), and construction of an elevated boardwalk trail and adjacent vegetation enhancement within the trail zone (2.66 acres). Unit A encompasses 26.33 acres, of which approximately 23 acres are existing wetlands. A total of 12.4 acres of surface area is proposed to be disturbed (that is, cleared, grubbed, or graded) on Unit A during construction; 0.7 acre of this disturbance is within existing wetlands on Unit A A total of 10. 71 acres is proposed to be mowed and sprayed; 9.02 acres of this total surface area is within existing wetlands. Site Preparation: Initially, high visibility fencing will be installed around the perimeter of the site and around the perimeter of all proposed work areas to prevent equipment intrusion into areas where no work is proposed. In addition, silt fencing will be installed along the entire length of Springbrook Creek and silt fencing or a compost berm will be installed along the perimeter of all proposed clearing, grubbing, and grading areas to prevent turbid water from entering Springbrook Creek and adjacent areas where no work is proposed. A temporary construction entrance and tire wash area will be installed at the northwest corner of Unit A within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) and an existing wetland. The construction entrance will be constructed using geotextile fabric topped with asphalt that will be removed upon completion of construction of the project. The tire wash water will be discharged to a Baker tank and then either hauled off site to an approved discharge location or discharged into a sanitary sewer. The exact method of removal will be determined by the contractor. In specific areas, existing reed canarygrass will be mowed immediately above the ground surface using small to medium sized grass-cutting equipment. Mowing will occur in June/July before seeds are formed on the plant stalks. During the dry periods of both August and September, the cut areas will be sprayed with glyphosate (Rodeo®) herbicide to control below ground roots and rhizomes. Once the reed canarygrass has been mowed and treated, it will be re-used as mulch. Himalayan blackberry will be mowed and sprayed in selected areas in preparation for the planting of native woody species. In other specifically prescribed areas, such as the earthen berm breach locations and the elevated boardwalk trail location, the surface vegetation will be cleared and grubbed to accommodate subsequent grading and boardwalk construction. For more information, see Attachment A-JARPA Drawings, sheet SP1; Attachment B Draft Final Mitigation Bank Instrument; and Attachment C -90% Design Plans. Grading: During the dry weather season, the existing earthen berm along the eastern edge of Springbrook Creek will be breached in three locations in order to reconnect Springbrook Creek with its historic floodplain. The breaches, which will be excavated using mechanical excavators (i.e., backhoe), will measure 20 feet wide and will be approximately 2 to 3 feet deep to match the existing ground surface elevation of the adjacent wetland. Approximately 583 cubic yards of fill material will be excavated and removed as part of the berm breaches on Units A and B. The maximum side slope of the breaches will be 3: 1 (horizontal to vertical). Disturbed soil areas near Springbrook Creek will be protected with a permanent erosion control blanket to prevent erosion. All excavated material will be removed from the site and disposed of at a WSDOT- approved upland site. The exact location of the disposal site will be determined by the contractor. A minimum of two habitat structures (vertical snags, brush piles and/or large woody debris) per acre and two planting hummocks per acre will be installed in reed canarygrass removal and treatment areas. Habitat structures and planting hummocks will be installed using a combination of a mechanical excavator and hand tools. An 8-foot-wide elevated boardwalk trail will also be constructed approximately 3 feet above the existing ground surface elevation. The trail will be built using a combination of both Copper Azole treated wood and recycled plastic lumber. Construction materials will be transported on site using a light truck. The elevated boardwalk trail will be supported by precast concrete pin foundations, which will be installed with hand held tools. The trail will be constructed in place using small "bobcat"-like tractor and fence post driver. In order to construct the trail, a small hole will be dug with a hand shovel and the pre-cast concrete diamond-shaped pier (footing) will be set in the hole, with dirt tamped around it. Four steel pins will be hammered (with an automatic hammer or sledge) into the ground through holes in the diamond pier. All trail construction work will be contained within the cleared and grubbed 18-foot-wide temporary trail construction corridor. Approaches to the elevated boardwalk will be paved with concrete or asphalt. The approaches will be approximately 8 feet wide by 20 feet long, 1,600 square feet at each end, for a total of approximately 3,200 square feet of paved surface. For more information, see Attachment A-JARPA Drawings, sheet GR1; Attachment B -Draft Final Mitigation Bank Instrument; and Attachment C -90% Design Plans. Planting: During the wet weather season, a density of 3.000 native trees and shrubs per acre will be installed within the wetland planting area. The riparian and upland areas will be planted with 1,500 stems per acre. Species to be planted within each planting area (e.g., wetland enhancement area, wetland rehabilitation area, riparian upland enhancement area, upland buffer habitat enhancement area, and elevated boardwalk trail zone enhancement area) have been selected for the hydrologic regime specific to that location. Any soils disturbed during planting will be covered with a minimum of 3 inches o woody mulch to minimize erosion and control weed growth. To ensure the survival of the plantings at the site, 1-inch-diameter PVC pipes with sprinkler heads will be laid above ground through planted areas. These pipes will be connected to the existing municipal water system and will operate on a timer system. This sprinkler network will be left in place until plants are established at the site, probably 2 to 3 years. For more information, see Attachment A-JARPA Drawings, sheet P1; Attachment B -Draft Final Mitigation Bank Instrument; and Attachment C 90% Design Plans. Unit B The work elements proposed on Unit B are wetland rehabilitation (31.43 acres), wetland re-establishment (0.12 acres), riparian upland enhancement (1.49 acres), and protection setback (buffer) establishment (3.45 acres). Unit B encompasses 36.49 acres, of which approximately 32 acres are existing wetlands. A total of 8. 7 acres of surface area is proposed to be disturbed (that is, cleared, grubbed, or graded) on Unit B during construction; 0.02 acre of this disturbance is within existing wetlands on Unit B. A total of 5. 7 acres is proposed to be mowed and sprayed; 4.1 acres of this total surface area is within existing wetlands. Site Preparation: Initially, high visibility fencing will be installed around the perimeter of the site and around the perimeter of all proposed work areas to prevent equipment intrusion into areas where no work is proposed. In addition, silt fencing will be installed along the entire length of Springbrook Creek and along the perimeter of all proposed clearing, grubbing, and grading areas to prevent turbid water from entering Springbrook Creek, and silt fencing or a compost berm will be installed in adjacent areas where no work is proposed. A temporary construction entrance and tire wash area will be installed at the northeast corner of Unit B within 200 feet of the OHWM and an existing wetland. The construction entrance will be constructed using geotextile fabric topped with asphalt that will be removed upon completion of construction of the project. The tire wash water will be discharged to a Baker tank and then either hauled off site to an approved discharge location or discharged into a sanitary sewer. The exact method of removal will be determined by the contractor. In specific areas, existing reed canarygrass will be mowed immediately above the ground surface using small to medium sized grass-cutting equipment. Mowing will occur in June/July before seeds are formed on the plant stalks. During the dry periods of both August and September, the cut areas will be sprayed with glyphosate (Rodeo®) herbicide to control below ground roots and rhizomes. Once the reed canarygrass has been mowed and treated, it will be re-used as mulch. Himalayan blackberry will be mowed and sprayed in selected areas in preparation for the planting of native woody species. In other specifically prescribed areas, such as the earthen berm breach locations, the surface vegetation will be cleared and grubbed to accommodate subsequent grading. For more information, see Attachment A-JARPA Drawings, sheet SP2; Attachment B Draft Final Mitigation Bank Instrument; and Attachment C -90% Design Plans. Grading: During the dry weather season, the existing earthen berm along the western edge of Springbrook Creek will be breached in four locations in order to reconnect Springbrook Creek with its historic floodplain. The breaches, which will be excavated using mechanical excavators (i.e., backhoe). will measure 20 feet wide and will be approximately 2 to 3 feet deep to match the existing ground surface elevation of the adjacent wetland. Approximately 583 cubic yards of fill material will be excavated and removed as part of the berm breaches on Units A and B. Maximum side slope of the breaches will be 3: 1 (horizontal to vertical). Disturbed soil areas near Springbrook Creek will be protected with a permanent erosion control blanket to prevent erosion. All excavated material will be removed from the site and disposed of at a WSDOT- approved upland site. The exact location of the disposal site will be determined by the contractor. A minimum of two habitat structures (vertical snags, brush piles, and/or large woody debris) per acre and two planting hummocks per acre will be installed in reed canarygrass removal and treatment areas. A minimum of two habitat structures per acre will also be installed in a 5-acre area dominated by cattail vegetation in Unit B. Habitat structures and planting hummocks will be installed using a combination of a mechanical excavator and hand tools. For more infonmation, see Attachment A-JARPA Drawings, sheet GR2; Attachment B Draft Final Mitigation Bank Instrument; and Attachment C -90% Design Plans. Planting: During the wet weather season, a density of 3.000 native trees and shrubs per acre will be installed within wetland planting area. The riparian and upland areas will be planted with 1,500 stems per acre. Species to be planted within each planting area (e.g., wetland enhancement area, wetland rehabilitation area, riparian upland enhancement area, and upland buffer habitat enhancement area) have been selected for the hydro logic regime specific to that location. Any soils disturbed during planting will be covered with a minimum of 3 inches of woody mulch to minimize erosion and control weed growth. To ensure the survival of the plantings at the site, 1-inch-diameter PVC pipes with sprinkler heads will be laid above ground through planted areas. These pipes will be connected to the existing municipal water system and will operate on a timer system. This sprinkler network will be left in place until plants are established at the site, probably 2 to 3 years. For more information, see Attachment A -JARPA Drawings, sheet P2; Attachment B -Draft Final Mitigation Bank Instrument; and Attachment C -90% Design Plans. Unite The work elements proposed on Unit C are wetland rehabilitation (1.19 acres), wetland re-establishment (9.27 acres), forested wetland enhancement (23.32 acres), Type I wetland enhancement (4.69 acres), upland habitat enhancement (7.80 acres), and protection setback (buffer) establishment (1.63 acres). Unit C encompasses 47.9 acres, of which 27.1 acres are existing wetlands. A total of 25.7 acres of surface area is proposed to be disturbed (that is, cleared, grubbed, or graded) on Unit C during construction; 2.3 acres of this disturbance is within existing wetlands on Unit C. A total of 10.07 acres is proposed to be mowed and sprayed; 6.07 acres of this total surface area is within existing wetlands. Site Preparation: Initially, high visibility fencing will be installed around the perimeter of all proposed work areas to prevent equipment intrusion into areas where no work is proposed. In addition, a compost berm will be installed along the perimeter of all proposed clearing, grubbing, and grading areas to prevent turbid water from entering adjacent areas where no work is proposed. A temporary construction entrance and tire wash area will be installed at the east end of Unit C within 200 feet of an existing wetland. The construction entrance will be constructed using geotextile fabric topped asphalt that will be removed upon completion of construction of the project. The tire wash water will be discharged to a Baker tank and then either hauled off site to an approved discharge location or discharged into a sanitary sewer. The exact method of removal will be determined by the contractor. In specific areas, existing reed canarygrass will be mowed immediately above the ground surface using small to medium sized grass-cutting equipment. Mowing will occur in June/July before seeds are formed on the plant stalks. During the dry periods of both August and September, the cut areas will be sprayed with glyphosate (Rodeo®) herbicide to control below ground roots and rhizomes. In other specifically prescribed areas, the surface vegetation will be cleared and grubbed to accommodate subsequent fill removal and grading. Once the reed canarygrass has been mowed and treated, it will be re- used as mulch. Himalayan blackberry will be mowed and sprayed in selected areas in preparation for the planting of native woody species. Large woody vegetation removed during clearing will be re-used as habitat structures elsewhere on the Springbrook Bank site. For more information, see Attachment A -JAR PA Drawings, sheets SP3 and SP4; Attachment B -Draft Final Mitigation Bank Instrument; and Attachment C -90% Design Plans. Grading: During the dry weather season, approximately 100.000 cubic yards of fill will be excavated from areas that were formerly wetlands, but are currently uplands. Excavation depths range from a few inches to 7 feet depending on the location. The maximum side slope within the excavation area will be 4: 1 (horizontal to vertical). Excavation and removal will be conducted using mechanical excavators, heavy trucks, and other similar excavation equipment. All excavated material will be removed from the site and disposed of at a WSDOT-approved upland site. The exact location of the disposal site will be determined by the contractor. Once the excavation is completed, the area will be rough graded to provide microtopographic variation. Recently excavated surface areas will receive a minimum of 3 inches of organic compost material, which will be incorporated into the upper 12 inches of soil. An adjustable-height weir will be installed at the outflow portion of the excavation area to impound surface hydrology to ensure wetland soil surface saturation and up to 2 inches of seasonal inundation at a surface elevation of 16.2 feet. The adjustable-height weir will be constructed in place using reinforced cast-in-place concrete support structure and aluminum stop logs materials, and a mechanical excavator, a truck, and hand tools. The existing conveyance ditch located on site will be plugged with approximately 500 cubic yards of clean fill material at regular spatial intervals to ensure that it no longer conveys water. The height of the ditch plugs will match the existing surface elevations on either side of the existing ditch. Maximum side slope of the ditch plugs will be 3:1 (horizontal to vertical). Mechanical excavators and similar equipment will be used to install the ditch plugs. A minimum of two habitat structures (vertical snags. brush piles, and/or large woody debris) per acre will be installed in reed canarygrass removal and treatment areas. Habitat structures will be installed using a combination of a mechanical excavator and hand tools. For more information, see Attachment A-JARPA Drawings, sheets GR3 and GR4; Attachment B -Draft Final Mitigation Bank Instrument; and Attachment C -90% Design Plans. Planting: During the wet weather season, a density of 3,000 native trees and shrubs per acre will be installed within wetland planting area, with the exception being that planting density will be 90 trees per acre in the forested wetland under- planting enhancement area. Species to be planted within most planting areas (e.g., wetland re-establishment area, wetland rehabilitation area, Type I wetland enhancement area. upland and upland buffer habitat enhancement area, and forested wetland under-planting enhancement area) have been selected for the hydrologic regime specific to that location. Any soils disturbed prior to and during planting will be covered with a minimum of 3 inches of woody mulch to minimize erosion and control weed growth. To ensure the survival of the plantings at the site. 1-inch-diameter PVC pipes with sprinkler heads will be laid above ground through planted areas. These pipes will be connected to the existing municipal water system and will operate on a timer system. This sprinkler network will be left in place until plants are established at the site, probably 2 to 3 years. For more information, see Attachment A-JARPA Drawings, sheets P3 and P4; Attachment B -Draft Final Mitigation Bank Instrument; and Attachment C -90% Design Plans. UnitD The work elements proposed on Unit Dare forested wetland enhancement (2.97 acres) and Type II wetland enhancement (2.63 acres). Unit D encompasses 5.6 acres, all of which are existing wetlands. A total of 0.9 acre of surface area is proposed to be disturbed (that is, cleared, grubbed, or graded) on Unit D during construction; all 0.9 acre of this disturbance is within existing wetlands on Unit D. No mowing or spraying will occur in Unit D. Approximately 21 cubic yards of soil material will be excavated and removed from existing wetlands to install the conveyance pipe. Site Preparation: Initially, high visibility fencing will be installed around the perimeter of all proposed work areas to prevent equipment intrusion into areas where no work is proposed. In addition, a compost berm will be installed along the perimeter of all proposed clearing, grubbing, and grading areas to prevent turbid water from entering adjacent areas where no work is proposed. A temporary construction entrance will be installed at the southeast corner of Unit D. The construction entrance will be constructed using geotextile fabric topped with 4-to 8-inch quarry spalls. In a specific area, the surface vegetation will be cleared and grubbed to accommodate subsequent installation of a drainage conveyance pipe. Large woody vegetation removed during clearing will be re-used as habitat structures elsewhere on the Springbrook Bank site. For more information, see Attachment A-JARPA Drawings, sheet SP5; Attachment B -Draft Final Mitigation Bank Instrument,; and Attachment C 90% Design Plans. Grading: All grading on Unit D will occur in the dry weather season. To enhance wetlands on site, a drainage conveyance pipe will be installed on Unit D. This conveyance pipe will convey approximately 45,000 cubic feet of additional surface hydrology per month to wetlands on the north end of Unit D from an existing stormwater treatment/detention facility located at the south end of Unit D. The existing stormwater treatment/detention pond currently discharges into the existing city stormwater conveyance system under SW 43rd Street which eventually discharges directly into Springbrook Creek. The drainage conveyance pipe will originate downstream of the existing stormwater treatment/detention pond control structure at the south end of Unit D and be installed under an existing gravel roadbed prior to entering the wetland at the north end of Unit D. The conveyance pipe will be buried several feet under the wetland surface until daylighting at the discharge location-approximately 200 feet inside the wetland boundary. Approximately 21 cubic yards of soil material will be excavated and removed to install the conveyance pipe. A small quarry spall flow dissipation pad will be installed at the downstream end of the conveyance pipe to prevent erosion. Excavation depths within the wetland for drainage conveyance pipe installation may be up to several feet, depending on the location. Excavation, pipe installation, and soil removal will be conducted using mechanical excavators, trucks, and other similar excavation equipment. All excavated material will be removed from the site and disposed of at a WSDOT- approved upland site. The exact location of the disposal site will be determined by the contractor. Habitat brush piles will be installed in this area once the drainage conveyance pipe has been installed. The habitat brush piles will be installed using a mechanical excavator and hand tools. For more information, see Attachment A-JARPA Drawings, sheet GR5; Attachment B -Draft Final Mitigation Bank Instrument; and Attachment C -90% Design Plans. Planting: During the wet weather season, a density of 90 trees per acre will be installed within the forested wetland under- planting enhancement area. Species to be planted within this planting area have been selected for the hydrologic regime specific to that location. In addition, there will be a wetland planting mix over the newly installed conveyance pipe in the wetland planting area. To ensure the survival of the plantings at the site, 1-inch-diameter PVC pipes with sprinkler heads will be laid above ground through planted areas. These pipes will be connected to the existing municipal water system and will operate on a timer system. This sprinkler network will be left in place until plants are established at the site, probably 2 to 3 years. For more information, see Attachment A JAR PA Drawings, sheet P5; Attachment B Draft Final Mitigation Bank Instrument; and Attachment C 90% Design Plans. Unit E The work elements proposed on Unit E are wetland re-establishment (8.37 acres), riparian upland enhancement (4.74 acres), and protection setback (buffer) establishment (2.11 acres). Unit E encompasses 15.22 acres, none of which are existing wetlands. A total of 13.5 acres of surface area is proposed to be disturbed (that is, cleared, grubbed, or graded) on Unit E during construction. A total of 1.2 acres is proposed to be mowed and sprayed, none of which is within existing wetlands. Site Preparation: Initially, high visibility fencing will be installed around the perimeter of the site and around the perimeter of all proposed work areas to prevent equipment intrusion into areas where no work is proposed. In addition, silt fencing will be installed alongside the entire length of Springbrook Creek and along the perimeter of all proposed clearing, grubbing, and grading areas to prevent turbid water from entering Springbrook Creek and adjacent areas where no work is proposed. A temporary construction entrance and tire wash area will be installed at the northwest corner of Unit E. The construction entrance will be constructed using geotextile fabric topped with asphalt that will be removed upon completion of construction of the project. The tire wash water will be discharged to a Baker tank and then either hauled off site to an approved discharge location or discharged into a sanitary sewer. The exact method of removal will be determined by the contractor. In most of Unit E, the surface vegetation will be cleared and grubbed to accommodate subsequent fill removal and grading. In a few selected areas, only invasive and non-native vegetation (i.e., reed canarygrass and Himalayan blackberry) will be mowed and sprayed to accommodate subsequent native vegetation plantings. Large woody vegetation removed during clearing will be re-used as habitat structures elsewhere on the Springbrook Bank site. For more information, see Attachment A JARPA Drawings. sheet SP6; Attachment B Draft Final Mitigation Bank Instrument; and Attachment C 90% Design Plans. Grading: During the dry weather season, approximately 160,000 cubic yards of fill will be excavated from areas that were formerly wetlands, but are currently uplands. Excavation depths range from a few inches to approximately 12 feet depending on the location. The maximum side slope in the excavation area will be 3:1 (horizontal to vertical). Excavation and removal will be conducted using mechanical excavators, heavy trucks, and other similar excavation equipment. All excavated material will be removed from the site and disposed of at a WSDOT-approved upland site. The exact location of the disposal site will be determined by the contractor. Once the excavation is completed, the area will be rough graded to provide microtopographic variation. Newly excavated surface areas will receive a minimum of 3 inches of organic compost material, which will be incorporated into the upper 12 inches of soil. All disturbed soils will be covered with a minimum of 3 inches of woody mulch to deter reed canarygrass growth and promote native woody plant establishment. As part of the site excavation, the earthen berm adjacent to Springbrook Creek will be breached in three locations on Unit E, allowing seasonal flood events from Springbrook Creek to penetrate much of Unit E. The breaches, which will be excavated using mechanical excavators (i.e., backhoe), will range in measurement from 20 feet wide to nearly 100 feet wide and approximately 12 feet deep to a ground elevation of approximately 8 feet. The maximum side slope of the breaches will be 3: 1 (horizontal to vertical). Low-flow channels will be graded into the interior portions of Unit E to allow fish to migrate out of Unit E to Springbrook Creek once seasonal flood waters recede. Disturbed soil areas near Springbrook Creek will be protected with quarry spalls to prevent erosion. The quarry spalls will be located below the OHWM (elevation 13 feet) and be placed at the flat part of the breach-approximately 5 feet landward of the toe of the slope to an elevation of 8 feet-and will extend up the slope a minimum of 3 feet (to an elevation of 11 feet). The quarry spalls, which consist of 754 cubic yards of 4-inch to 8-inch rock, will be incorporated into the ground surface and encompass approximately 0.32 acre. Native vegetation, such as willows, will be planted in the quarry spall areas. A minimum of two habitat structures (vertical snags and/or large woody debris) per acre will be installed in the wetland re- establishment area. Habitat structures will be installed using a combination of a mechanical excavator and hand tools. For more information, see Attachment A-JARPA Drawings, sheet GR6; Attachment B Draft Final Mitigation Bank Instrument; and Attachment C 90% Design Plans. Planting: During the wet weather season, a density of 3.000 native trees and shrubs per acre will be installed within wetland planting area, with the exception that planting density will be 90 trees per acre in the upland underplanting enhancement areas. The riparian and upland areas will be planted with 1,500 stems per acre. Species to be planted within most planting areas (e.g., wetland re-establishment area, riparian upland enhancement area, and upland buffer habitat enhancement area) have been selected for the hydro logic regime specific to that location. Any soils disturbed during planting will be covered with a minimum of 3 inches of woody mulch to minimize erosion and control weed growth. To ensure the survival of the plantings at the site, 1-inch-diameter PVC pipes with sprinkler heads will be laid above ground through planted areas. These pipes will be connected to the existing municipal water system and will operate on a timer system. This sprinkler network will be left in place until plants are established at the site, probably 2 to 3 years. For more information, see Attachment A-JARPA Drawings, sheet P6; Attachment B -Draft Final Mitigation Bank Instrument; and Attachment C 90% Design Plans. PREPARATION OF DRAWINGS: See sample drawings and guidance for completing the drawings ONE SET OF ORIGINAL OR GOOD QUALITY REPRODUCIBLE DRAWINGS MUST BE ATTACHED. NOTE: Applicants are encouraged to submit photographs of the project site, but these DO NOT substitute for drawings. THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND COAST GUARD REQUIRE DRAWINGS ON 8-112 X 11 INCH SHEETS. LARGER DRAWINGS MAY BE REQUIRED BY OTHER AGENCIES. 7b. Describe the purpose of the proposed work and why you want or need to perform it at the site. Please explain any specific needs that have influenced the design. The purpose of the Springbrook Bank is to provide compensatory mitigation in advance of unavoidable impacts to wetlands and other aquatic resources from future WSDOT projects and other City of Renton projects within the service area of the bank. The proposed project focuses on improving wetland area and function and riparian functions near Springbrook Creek. Construction work includes extensive site grading on Units C and E; breaching the earthen berms adjacent to Springbrook Creek on Units A and B; opening Unit E to fiooding from Springbrook Creek; removing and controlling invasive reed canarygrass in Units A, B, C, and E; educating the public by placing environmentally educational signage on the constructed elevated boardwalk trail on Unit A; installing habitat structures; and planting native woody vegetation in all units. This work will enhance a broad range of ecological functions to improve wetland habitat, water quality, and hydrologic functions. 7c. Describe the potential impacts to characteristic uses of the water body. These uses may include fish and aquatic life, water quality, water supply, recreation and aesthetics. Identify proposed actions to avoid, minimize, and mitigate detrimental impacts and provide proper protection of fish and aquatic life. Identify which guidance documents you have used. Attach a separate sheet if additional space is needed. Potential impacts to Springbrook Creek and onsite wetlands, proposed avoidance and minimization measures, and proposed compensatory mitigation measures are summarized in the following paragraphs. The following attachments provide detailed information and analysis of impacts to Springbrook Creek, onsite wetlands, and Endangered Species Act (ESA)-listed species and contain proposed actions to avoid, minimize, and mitigate detrimental impacts: • Attachment B -Draft Final Mitigation Bank Instrument • Attachment D -Biological Assessment • Attachment E Springbrook Fisheries Review White Paper Potential Impacts Fish and Aquatic Life: Temporary riparian area and wetland impacts will occur within Units A, B, and E when riparian and wetland areas are enhanced by mowing, spraying, clearing. and grubbing invasive vegetation; installing erosion control measures; and planting or underplanting with native vegetation. Although existing riparian conditions vary, the majority of these areas on the site are currently moderately to severely degraded. Therefore, many of the functions that riparian vegetation provides are already altered and will not be substantially affected as compared to existing conditions. Noise impacts will be greatest during construction along Springbrook Creek; however, this area is already exposed to a high level of ambient noise (highways, airport, railroad, adjacent road arterial, and commercial/industrial land uses). The berms that presently separate Springbrook Creek from Units A, B, and E will be breached. In Units A and B, the creation of hydrologic connections 20 feet wide through the existing berms will reconnect Springbrook Creek to floodplain wetlands and their functions at stream elevations greater than 12 feet. In Unit E, three sections of the existing berm will be removed to connect Unit E to Springbrook Creek. Elevations below 11.5 feet will be saturated during at least 5 percent and inundated during at least 1 percent of the growing season (March 1 through October 31 ). Unit E will be graded such that all water will directly drain out to Springbrook Creek as floodwaters recede. However, Units A and B will have some surface areas that will retain water after floodwaters recede. For a detailed discussion on hydrology, refer to Attachment F -Springbrook Creek Wetland Restoration Memorandum. It is possible that juvenile salmon ids may become stranded in these lower elevation areas in Units A and B. However, the potential for fish stranding after construction should be less than under present conditions. For a detailed discussion on fish use and fish stranding, refer to Attachment D Biological Assessment and Attachment E -Springbrook Fisheries Review White Paper. Once constructed, the project will result in many positive impacts to fish and aquatic life. The Springbrook Bank will restore, rehabilitate, enhance, and permanently preserve wetland and riparian areas and upland buffers throughout the site. Habitat improvements include removal of invasive plant communities and replacement of those communities with diverse, native, multi-strata vegetation that will provide increased opportunity for food and shelter. Reconnecting Springbrook Creek to its historic fioodplain will provide wider stream margins with slower velocity waters, which will provide off-channel refugia habitat for juvenile salmonids and other resident species. Placement of large woody debris and other special habitat features will provide cover for prey species and fish. Improved groundwater connectivity will increase groundwater recharge and improve water quality in Springbrook Creek by contributing cooler, cleaner water. Water Quality: Most units will be cleared, grubbed, graded, and excavated; mowed and sprayed for removal of invasive species; or have erosion control measures placed. Any of these activities that temporarily disturb soil could result in erosion and sedimentation. Best management practices (BMPs), conservation measures, and performance standards will be implemented to minimize the impacts of sedimentation and turbidity. BMPs, conservation measures, and performance standards will be implemented to avoid, minimize, and control potential discharges of surface contaminants, including turbidity, into Springbrook Creek and the on-site wetlands. Water Supply: Two types of changes to surface water supply will occur as a result of the project, both of which are beneficial to Springbrook Creek and the on-site wetlands. First, the existing earthen berms along the edge of Springbrook Creek will be breached at multiple locations on Units A, B, and E in order to reconnect Springbrook Creek with its historic floodplain. Second, to enhance wetland hydrology on Units C and D, a drainage conveyance pipe will be installed on Unit D. This will also benefit Unit C since Unit D currently drains northward to Unit C. This conveyance pipe will convey approximately 45,000 cubic feet of additional surface hydrology per month to wetlands on the north end of Unit D from an existing stormwater treatment/detention facility located at the south end of Unit D. The existing stormwater treatment/detention pond currently discharges into the existing city stormwater conveyance system under SW 43rd Street, which eventually discharges directly into Springbrook Creek. For a detailed discussion on surface water supply, refer to Attachment F -Springbrook Creek Wetland Restoration Memorandum. Recreation and Aesthetics: The site will be fully vegetated with native trees and shrubs and permanently protected from development and recreational uses, with the exception of the elevated boardwalk trail in Unit A Shading impacts will be minimal, if at all, since the boardwalk runs north to south and is 8 feet wide. The elevated boardwalk trail in Unit A will be a passive recreational use along the boardwalk to be enjoyed by those who use the trail. The trail will be accessible for pedestrian foot traffic (no bicycle traffic), including people with disabilities, and will connect to a larger, existing regional trail system-the King County regional Interurban Trail and the King County regional Green River Trail Avoidance and Minimization Measures To minimize impacts to fish, aquatic life, and water quality, the following BMPs will be employed. These BMPs will adhere to the 2006 WSDOT Standard Specifications. Environmental Compliance • WSDOT will utilize a commitment tracking system to identify all commitments made during ESA consultation, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), design, and permitting per WSDOT Environmental Procedures Manual Chapter 490.02. All project commitments will be clearly communicated in the Special Provisions to the contractor, who will in turn communicate commitments to project office staff and supporting design offices. Commitments will be tracked throughout the various stages of the project delivery. • To reduce or eliminate impacts from construction-related pollutant spills, a Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan and Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) Plan will be prepared for this project. The SPCC Plan and TESC Plan will be developed and submitted by the contractor to the project engineer prior to commencing any construction. BMPs will be implemented during project construction to reduce or eliminate potential sources of hazardous material contamination. A copy of the SPCC Plan and TESC Plan with any updates will be maintained at the work site by the contractor. The SPCC Plan will identify construction planning elements and recognize potential spill sources at the site. The SPCC Plan will outline responsive actions in the event of a spill or release, and will identify notification and reporting procedures. The SPCC Plan will also outline contractor management elements, such as personnel responsibilities, project site security. site inspections, and training. The SPCC Plan will outline what measures the contractor will take to prevent the release or spread of hazardous materials either found on site or encountered durin construction but not identified in contract documents, or any hazardous materials that the contractor stores, uses, or generates on the construction site during construction activities. These items include, but are not limited to, gasoline, oils, and chemicals. Hazardous materials are defined in Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 70.105.010 under "hazardous substance." Erosion Control • Prior to the start of construction, all sensitive areas and clearing limits will be marked with high visibility construction fencing, and erosion control devices will be placed to prevent runoff of sediment into wetlands and streams. The Contractor will confine construction projects to the minimum area necessary to complete the project as defined by the flagged clearing limits. • Impacts on wetlands and streams will be minimized during construction through the use of approved temporary erosion and sediment control BMPs. • Impacts to streams will be minimized during work in, over, and adjacent to water through the use of approved BMPs. • Breaching of the berms will occur during summer low flows to further limit sediment from entering Springbrook Creek and so that no in-water work will be required in Springbrook Creek. • Excavation and grading in Unit E will be conducted in the dry prior to breaching the berm along Springbrook Creek. Staging • Temporary material storage stockpiles will not be placed in the 100-year floodplain between October 1 and May 1. Material used within 72 hours of deposition will not be considered a temporary material storage stockpile. All temporary material storage stockpiles will be protected by appropriate BMPs to prevent sediments from leaving the stockpiles. • Units C and E will be used as staging areas prior to being excavated. In addition, the existing roadbed within Unit D will also be used as a staging area for the project. Additional off-site staging areas may be necessary to complete the project; however, the locations of these additional off-site staging areas have not been determined. Any off-site staging area locations will ultimately be determined by the project contractor; however, WSDOT will require the contractor to locate any additional off-site staging areas more than 300 feet from any wetlands, ditches, flowing or standing water, or other sensitive areas. • When practicable, all fueling and maintenance of equipment will occur more than 300 feet from the nearest wetland, ditches, and flowing or standing water (fueling large cranes, excavators, and drill rigs over 300 feet away may not be practicable). Grubbing and Clearing • Vegetation will only be grubbed from areas undergoing permanent alteration. All areas grubbed for temporary construction access will be restored when construction is completed. Herbicide Use Herbicides will be applied in accordance with the herbicide label by a licensed applicator with an aquatic endorsement. Trail Construction • Treated wood will be inspected before installation to ensure that there are not any superficial deposits of preservative material on the wood. • Treated wood will not be stored within the nearest wetland or ditch, or in flowing or standing water, and will remain covered until used. • Non-creosote treated wood will be treated using the April 17, 2002 revised Amendment to Best Management Practices for the Use of Treated Wood in Aquatic Environments; USA Version-Revised July 1996-Western Wood Preservers Institute. The Western Wood Preserver Institute BMPs for Treated Wood in Aquatic Applications and amendments can be found at the following link: http//www.wwpinstitute.org/mainpages/thebmpswoodinaquat.shtml. • In addition, the contractor will treat wood according to the Memorandum of Agreement between Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) and the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) dated August 1995, which specifies the use of treated wood in aquatic environments. • The elevated boardwalk trail design will include measures, such a.s side rails, to prevent impacts from human intrusion into vegetated areas of Unit A. • Fabrication of the trail will not be completed over flowing water. • Areas adjacent to the elevated boardwalk trail within the temporary boardwalk trail construction corridor will be replanted with native trees and shrubs. Debris resultin from construction of the boardwalk trail will be revented from enterin wetland, ditches, or flowin or standing water through the use of tarps or other containment devices, to the greatest extent possible. Lighting • Within 300 feet of waters known to contain ESA-listed fish life, all temporary project lighting will be minimized between sunset and sunrise from November 1 to January 15, and from March 15 to May 15. No temporary project light, including mobile units, will shine directly on any waters known to contain ESA-listed fish outside of the in-water work window time periods. Fish and Wildlife • To prevent fish stranding, low-flow connecting channels were incorporated into the design of Unit E. Also, berm breach elevations on Unit E extend below the OHWM of Springbrook Creek. Earthen berm breach elevations on Units A and B match adjacent wetland elevations and are at the OHWM of Springbrook Creek. • All berm breaching associated with Springbrook Creek will occur during the WDFW-prescribed work window of June 15 through September 30. • The contractor will provide advance notification to WDFW and Ecology before commencing work in an environmentally sensitive area, in accordance with permit conditions. • Construction equipment will not enter any water body without authorization from WDFW. Though the berm breaches extend below the OHWM of Springbrook Creek, construction equipment will not enter Springbrook Creek below the wetted perimeter and all berm breach excavation work will be done during summer low creek-flow periods. • Any noise impacts to fish will be minimized by limiting the timeframe associated with breaching of the berms next to Springbrook Creek to WDFWs in-water work window, when the fewest number of fish are expected to be present. • Turbidity levels will not exceed maximums specified in the Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington (Chapter 173-201A Washington Administrative Code [WAC]). Bank Protection • For Units A, B, and E, living plant material and large woody debris will be incorporated into the bank protection designs, or as by an approved planting plan. Restoration and Revegetation • A 40-foot-wide protection setback area (buffer) will be established between the proposed habitat and incompatible land uses along the site perimeter. • Riparian vegetation will be replanted with species native to the region, or as by an approved planting plan. • Disturbed areas will be replanted with native plant species, or as by an approved planting plan. Miscellaneous • All excess excavated material will be removed and placed in WSDOT-approved upland locations where it cannot enter waters of the state as per the contract documents. • All washwater associated with construction will be contained to prevent runoff into adjacent wetlands and Springbrook Creek as per the contract documents. Construction Monitoring • WSDOT inspectors will monitor site construction to ensure work is completed according to site plan sheets and permit conditions. • Qualified inspectors will oversee construction to ensure compliance with contract language, special provisions, and all existing WSDOT environmental procedures. • A preconstruction meeting, as well as weekly progress meetings, will be held between the contractor and WSDOT to review all contract requirements. • Site elevations will be surveyed in Units A, B, C, and E during construction to ensure excavated elevations are as shown on the site grading plan. • Woody habitat structures and plant material will be inspected, properly stored, and installed by a qualified project engineer or representative. Long-term Maintenance/Compliance • WSDOT and the City of Renton will provide assurance that all long-term compliance expectations are communicated to the responsible parties. • The site will be maintained for a period of 10 years or until performance standards are met, whichever occurs later. Maintenance activities include, but are not limited to, weed control, trash removal, vandalism repair, and structure and/or sianaae maintenance. • Long-term maintenance (Year 10 through Year 20) will be conducted by the City of Renton to ensure that functional benefits of the Springbrook Bank are not degraded. • All structures and facilities within Springbrook Bank. including fences, the elevated boardwalk, the stormwater diversion pipe and structure, and the stop-log weir, shall be properly maintained in perpetuity or for as long as each is needed to accomplish the goals of Springbrook Bank. • After the 20-year period ends, the City of Renton will continue to manage the site by fulfilling landowner obligations defined in the Conservation Easement to maintain the ecological functions on the site. These obligations include prohibiting activities that may convert the bank site into vacant land such as burning, dumping, or harvesting wood. Landowner obligations also include noxious weed control, emergency control of pests, and maintaining fences to restrict human access. Compensatory Mitigation • The construction of the elevated boardwalk trail on Unit A, located within the 2.66-acre trail zone, will be mitigated by the minimized trail footprint and the wetland rehabilitation work that will occur within the 2.66-acre trail zone area, minus the 8-foot-wide by 1,365-foot-long (or approximately 0.25 acre) boardwalk trail footprint itself. In order for the wetland rehabilitation work to adequately mitigate for placement of the elevated boardwalk trail, the entire 2.66-acre trail zone will not generate any mitigation bank credits. • All other impacts are considered temporary construction impacts and are essentially self-mitigated by the project. However, based on coordination with the Muckleshoot Tribe, additional large woody debris habitat structures have been incorporated into the Unit E design to offset any potential impacts from boardwalk trail construction on Unit A. See Attachment B Draft Final Mitigation Bank Instrument for performance standards, a planting plan that incorporates native vegetation, and construction monitoring. 7d. For in water construction work, will your project be in compliance with the State of Washington water quality standards for turbidity WAC 173.201A-110? rxT YES O NO (See USEFUL DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS) 8. Will the project be constructed in stages? YES D NO 0 Proposed starting date: Fall 2006 Estimated duration of activity: Approximately 24 months Project work will begin during the fall of 2006 and extend through 2008, taking approximately 24 months. Site preparation activities, such as installation of erosion control measures, will occur during seasonally dry periods in the fall of 2006 or winter or spring of 2007. Site clearing, grubbing, grading, habitat structure installation, elevated boardwalk trail foundation construction, and Units A and B berm breaches will occur during seasonally dry weather periods in the late spring, summer, and early fall of 2007. Berm breaches on Unit E will occur during seasonally dry weather periods in the late spring or summer of 2008. Vegetation planting activities will occur during seasonally wet weather periods in the late fall and winter of 2007, and in summer or fall of 2008. 9. Check if any temporary or permanent structures will be placed: N/A D Waterward of the ordinary high water mark or line for fresh or tidal waters AND/OR D Waterward of the mean higher high water for tidal waters? 10. Will fill material (rock, fill, bulkhead, or other material) be placed: Yes, quarry spalls will be placed waterward of the OHWM during summer low flow on Unit E to prevent erosion. 0 Waterward of the ordinary high water mark or line for fresh waters? If YES, VOLUME (cubic yards) 754 i AREA0.32 (acres) D Waterward of the mean higher high water for tidal waters? If YES, VOLUME (cubic yards) / AREA (acres) 11. Will material be placed in wetlands? 0 YES D NO If YES: Fill material will be placed for habitat planting hummocks on Units A and B; soil ditch plugs and the weir structure on Unit C; and the quarry spalls on Unit D. Table 1 provides a breakdown of these fill amounts for each unit. See Attachment A JARPA Drawings for details. Table 1 Volume and Area of Fill in Wetlands i Volume Area Unit (cubic yards) (acre) Unit A 87 03 0.02 Unit B 61.02 . 0.03 Unit C 528 0.26 -...... - Unit D 8 0.002 As part of the mitigation treatment throughout the bank. woody mulch will be spread over approximately 20 acres to deter weeds. Table 2 provides a breakdown of mulch that will placed in existing wetlands for each unit. Table 2 Volume and Area of Mulch in Wetlands Volume Area Unit (cubic yards) (acre) Unit A 3,533 8.8 Unit B 2.159 5.4 ············-·-·····-·-····· UnitC 2,494 6.2 A. Impacted area in acres: Approximately 20. 71 acres B. Has a delineation been completed? If YES, please submit with application. 0 YES D NO See Attachment G Wetland Delineation Report C. Has a wetland report been prepared? If YES, please submit with application 0 YES D NO See Attachment B -Draft Final Mitigation Bank Instrument D. Type and composition of fill material (e.g., sand, etc.) See answers to 11 E, 11 F, and 13 below. E. Material source: Clean soils excavated elsewhere on site or to be determined by contractor. F. List all soil series (type of soil) located at the project site, and indicate if they are on the county's list of hydric soils. Soils information can be obtained from the natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). Snohomish silt loam, Woodinville silt loam, Puyallup fine sandy loam, and Puget silty clay loam. The Puget, Snohomish, and Woodinville series are listed as hydric soils. G. WILL PROPOSED ACTIVITY CAUSE FLOODING OR DRAINING OF WETLANDS? 0 YES O NO The Springbrook Bank project proposes to supplement existing hydrology to Unit D (which will eventually drain to If YES, IMPACTED AREA IS QACRES OF DRAINED WETLANDS. NOTE: If your project wm impact greater than 1/z of an acre of wetland, submit a mitigation plan to the Corps and Ecology for approval along with the JARPA form. NOTE: A 401 water quality certification will be required from Ecology in addition to an approved mitigation plan if your project impacts wetlands that are: a) greater than X acre in si orb) tidal wetlands or wetlands adjacent to tidal water. Please submit the JARPA fonn and mit'Jation plan to Ecology for an individual 401 certification tf a) orb) applies. 12. Stormwater Compliance for Nationwide Permits Only: This proJect is (or will be) designed to meet ecology's most current stormwater manual, or an Ecology approved local stormwater manual. 0 YES D NO If YES -Which manual will your project be designed to meet? WSDOT March 2004 Highway Runoff Manual If NO -For clean water act Section 401 and 404 permits only -Please submit to Ecology for approval, along with this JARPA application, documentation that demonstrates the stormwater runoff from your project or activity will comply with the water quality standards, WAC 173.201(A) 13. Will excavation or dredging be required in water or wetlands? 0 YES (Please see Tables 3 and 4 for details) D NO If YES Table 3 Volume and Area of Excavation within OHWM Volume Area Unit (cubic yards) (acre) Unit E 570 0.14 Table 4 Volume and Area of Excavation in Existing Wetlands Volume Area Unit (cubic yards) (acre) Unit A 24.5 0.06 -·-· ···········-·-···---··--~--- Unit B 3.9 0.03 ...•. Unit C . 7,917 1.75 Unit D 21 0.09 A Volume: Within OHWM, aggroximately 570 (cubic )lards/ area O 14 (acre] Within existing wetlands aggroximatel)l 7 966.4 (cubic )lards) /area 1.93 (acre] B. Composition of material to be removed: Old fill material grimaril)l glacial till, silt, and sand C. Disposal site for excavated material: WSDOT-aggroved ugland disgosal site to be determined by contractor D. Method of dredging: Mechanical excavator 14. Has the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) been completed [TI YES D NO SEPA Lead Agency: WSDOT SEPA Decision: DNS, MONS, EIS, Adoption, Exemption DNS Decision Date (end of comment period) January 10, 2006 SUBMIT A COPY OF YOUR SEPA DECISION LETTER TO WDFW AS REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETE APPLICATION Please see Attachment H SEPA Decision Letter and Notice of Action Taken. 15. List other Applications, approvals or certifications from other federal, state or local agencies for any structures, construction discharges or other activities described in the application (i.e. preliminary plat approval, health district approval, building permit, SEPA review, federal energy regulatory commission license (FERG), Forest practices application, etc.). Also, indicate whether work has been completed and indicate all existing work on drawings. NOTE: For use with Corps Nationwide Permits, identify whether your project has or will need an NPDES permit for discharging wastewater and/or stormwater. TYPE OF APPROVAL ISSUING AGENCY IDENTIFICATION NO DATE OF APPLICATION DATE APPROVED COMPLETE D' Section 402 NPDES Permit Ecology No CZMA Consistency Determination No Letter (form attached as Attachment I) Ecology ESA Concurrence Letter USFWS No ESA Concurrence Letter NMFS No Shoreline Substantial Development City of Renton No Section 106 Concurrence Letter Log: 110805-January 4, Yes (attached as Attachment J) DAHP 05-FHWA 2006 16. Has any agency denied approval for the activity you're applying for or for any activity directly related to the activity described herein? D YES 0 NO If YES, explain: ECY 070-15 (Rev. 11/04) JAR PA Contact the State of Washington Office of Regulatory Assistance for latest version or call 360/407-7037 or 800/917-0043 SECTION B -Use for Shoreline and Corps of Engineers permits only: 17a. Total cost of project. This means the fair market value of the project, including materials, labor, machine rentals, etc. $7.5 to $8.5 million 17b. If a project or any portion of a project receives funding from a federal agency, that agency is responsible for ESA consultation. Please indicate if you will receive federal funds and what federal agency is providing those funds. See instructions for information on ESA.* FEDERAL FUNDING D YES 0 NO If YES, please list the federal agency. 18. Local government with jurisdiction: City of Renton 19. For Corps, Coast Guard and DNR penmits, provide names, addresses and telephone numbers of adjoining property owners, lessees, etc. Please note: Shoreline Management Compliance may require additional notice -consult your local government. See Attachment K -List of Adjacent Property Owners for a map and full list of adjacent property owners. ----- SECTION C -This section MUST be comoleted for anv oermit covered bv this ann/ication 20. Application is hereby made for a penmit or penmits to authorize the activities described herein. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application, and that to the best of my knowledge and belief, such information is true, complete, and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the proposed activities. I hereby grant to the agencies to which this application is made, the right to enter the above-described location to inspect the proposed, in-progress or completed work. I agree to start work ONLY after all necessary permits have been received. DATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED AGENT I HEREBY DESIGNATE TO ACT AS MY AGENT IN MATIERS RELATED TO THIS APPLICATION FOR PERMIT($). I UNDERSTAND THAT IF A FEDERAL PERMIT IS ISSUED, I MUST SIGN THE PERMIT. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF LANDOWNER (EXCEPT PUBLIC ENTITY LANDOWNERS, E.G. DNR) THIS APPL/CAT/ON MUST BE SIGNED BY THE APPLICANT AND THE AGENT, IF AN AUTHORIZED AGENT IS DESIGNATED. 18 U.S.C §1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact or makes any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both. COMPLETED BY LOCAL OFFICIAL A. Nature of the existing shoreline. (Describe type of shoreline, such as marine, stream, lake, lagoon, marsh, bog, swamp, flood plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such as accretion, erosion, high bank, low bank, or dike; material such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any) 8, In the event that any of the proposed buildings or structures will exceed a height of thirty-five feet above the average grade level, indicate the approximate location of and number of residential units, existing and potential, that will have an obstructed view: C. If the application involves a conditional use or variance, set forth in full that portion of the master program which provides that the proposed use may be a conditional use, or, in the case of a variance, from which the variance is being sought: These Agencies are Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action employers. For special accommodation needs. please contact the appropriate agency In the instructions ECY 070-15 (Rev. 11 /04) JARPA Contact the State of Washington Office of Regulatory Assistance for latest version or call 360/407-7037 or 800/917-00 Printed: 02-21-2006 Payment Made: :ITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUAOS-017 Receipt Number: DEVFLop ?, l;fENJ p ,/Ty OF Ai::,/;AN~ii,'vG -~,v10t'\1 FEB 2 1 2006 RECEIVED R0600886 Total Payment: 02/21/2006 04:08 PM 1,000.00 Payee: ANCHOR ENVIRONMENTAL Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount ---------------------------------------------·------------------------- 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 1,000.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check 19761 1,000.00 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3 021 5006 5007 5008 5009 5010 50ll 5012 5013 5014 5015 5016 5017 5018 5019 5020 5021 5022 5024 5036 5909 5941 5954 5955 5998 303.000.00.345.85 000.345.81.00.0002 000.345.81.00.0003 000.345.81.00.0004 000.345.81.00.0006 000.345.81.00.0007 000.345.81.00.0008 000.345.81.00.0009 000.345.81.00.0010 000.345.81.00.0011 000.345.81.00.0012 000.345.81.00.0013 000.345.81.00.0014 000.345.81.00.0015 000.345.81.00.0016 000.345.81.00.0017 000.345.81.00.0018 000.345.81.00.0019 000.345.81.00.0024 000.345.81.00.0005 000.341.60.00.0024 000.341.50.00.0000 604.237.00.00.0000 000.05.519.90.42.l 000.231.70.00.0000 Park Mitigation Fee Annexation Fees Appeals/Waivers Binding Site/Short Plat Conditional Use Fees Environmental Review Prelirn/Tentative Plat Final Plat PUD Grading & Filling Fees Lot Line Adjustment Mobile Home Parks Rezone Routine Vegetation Mgmt Shoreline Subst Dev Site Plan Approval Temp Use or Fence Review variance Fees Conditional Approval Fee Comprehensive Plan Amend Booklets/EIS/Copies Maps (Taxable) Special Deposits Postage Tax Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00