Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA-06-088_Report 01
Kathy Keolker, Mayor September 12, 2007 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN.- Subject: ONCERN: Subject: _ ' (11F, R.7"�r---UONN- P lanning/B unaing/Pub li c Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator CITY CLERK CIN OF RENTON SEP 1 3 2007 c r r Y C ECAYS€OFFICE Please see attached new plats that have just been addressed. Please add these addresses to your City directories and maps_ Amanda Court Short Plat Blakey Townhomes Short Plat Chen Short Plat Garden of Eden LLA Honey Brooke West; Sagecrest Plat Langley Ridge Plat Ng Short Plat Rainier Station LLA ncerely, Jan Conklin Energy Plans Examiner Development Services Division Telephone: 425-430-7276 # 1: platadd Barbee Mill Plat Bretzke Rogers Lotline adjustment Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 2 Highlands Park Plat Houvener Short Plat Brewis/Meadow Ave Short Plat Puget Colony I Short Plat Renton Prop Short Plat 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 WA 01 m !� Vm r S m j� y � 'ou Z4*) V an d p �'A r fr Oma! •C•f` 0 Y y s ~ _ 2 0 p N o � �G� mf m �'p� 0 M Y >.rn � Aatia � � �{ �O ri fl f I Z a rr y N00'02'42"E 295.19' r @ r t m Ex O n K �f 50.00 4 yT4{INC r `q DoT pqR�+ m m Ctii X660' �MAZ w m . - m N00'02'i44'E 567.06' L6 Sp z-+ a mom i 0 �o so 4Q O Nod f' E �� om 20 CI tt ZM 21A N0'02'42�"\\\. 29607 tis o �d N00'02 42'E 124.00' N N90'( ZE m fcl' Op m T m W N00'02'42'E ]66.88' -.m .. v N m rn ~ so N00'02'42'E � cif •� � m m � y, �«: -, � m N n. r m 3 m � �aJ• � 9Q �a Z a Z a O N00'04'15"E 326,45' �D N00'02'42'E 175.63' N N00'04'15'E 296.44' 202.4d' . +3M 73 Q Ul Z rm Q ry v s� +G +K n ki I �c h m .`+a `y�9c+ 91 a n .b �dC _m Q►Z~ mo aN2 n�w2 � �r �'w0 Af wa{ 1po 0 < o N �0 �r'v y �} QA � N00'02'42'E 296-29' < s' WA 01 m !� Vm r S m j� y � 'ou Z4*) V an d p �'A r fr Oma! •C•f` 0 Y y s ~ _ 2 0 p N o � �G� mf m �'p� 0 M Y >.rn � Aatia � � �{ �O ri fl f I Z a rr y N00'02'42"E 295.19' r @ r t m Ex O n K �f 50.00 4 yT4{INC r `q DoT pqR�+ m m Ctii X660' �MAZ w m . - m N00'02'i44'E 567.06' L6 Sp z-+ a mom i 0 t • so 4Q O Nod f' E �� om 20 CI �rn �qn a -mo �h ZM 21A N0'02'42�"\\\. 29607 v o N00'02 42'E 124.00' N N90'( M/ m Op m v W N00'02'42'E ]66.88' -.m .. v N m rn ~ so N00'02'42'E � cif •� � m m � y, �«: -, � m N n. r m 3 m � �aJ• � 9Q �a � a Z a 20' NOQ '02'42 o v ! ao Z� N." w9d. 00' LAcco�r m 6(.9 c$I to o N ✓ � �� � - y � D Ni rR rlm Wyl"' � - LHN r- o z w ~ . ..� a r -r f V bow 1a I' j -` -W� m li rrnnm Tm '�mzm o /Ma N00'02'42'E C p O m o 6j62a ,'w Ar-�.i p Lm 21A u�. '� o N00'02 42'E 124.00' N o v M/ � 55,7' v E . v 165.90 i ~ so N00'02'42'E y, 175.90' Z� N." w9d. 00' LAcco�r m 6(.9 c$I to o N ✓ � �� � - y � D Ni rR rlm Wyl"' � - LHN r- o z w ~ . ..� a r -r f V bow 1a I' j -` -W� m li rrnnm Tm '�mzm o /Ma 1 2 ol o au 0 O O (p a a 120.05' N00'02'42'E C p O m o 6j62a ,'w Ar-�.i p Lm 21A u�. '� o N00'02 42'E 124.00' N o v 1 2 ol o au 0 O O (p a a 120.05' m Lm o ow M/ � 55,7' m A N00'02'42'E 175.63' N 6 . +3M ki I j CITY OF RENTON PLANNING / BUILDIING / PUBLIC WORKS I4 MEMORANDUM Date: June 15, 2007 To: Ci�y Clerk's Office From: St�cy Tucker Sub ect: Lab. d Use File Closeout Please compietethe following Information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by th City Clerk's Office. Project Name: Bretzke-Rogers Lot Line Adjustment LUA (file) Nuiv ber: LUA-06-088, LLA Cross-Referen : AIKA's: Project Manag r: Andrea Petzel Acceptance Da:e: July 31, 2006 Applicant: Daniel Bretzke Owner: Daniel & Fumiko Bretzke & Larry Rogers Contact: Daniel Bretzke PID Number: 1023059358;1023059357 ERC Decisionate: ERC Appeal Da e: Administrative Approval: January 18, 2007 Appeal Period nds: February .16, 2007 Public Hearing Date: Date Appealeito HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealedito Council: By Whom: Council Decisi n: Date: Mylar Recordi g Number: Project Descri tion: The applicant Is proposing to adjust th,e lot lines between four lots in the R-4 zone. The net d nsity of the four lots is approx. 1.74 units/acre. The site contains 34,16 sq. ft. of wetlands. The a plicant proposes to reconfigure the lots so that the wetlands would be rotected, two buildable lots would be made and two lots would be created that could be short pla ed In the future. The tot saes would be: Lot A 11,431.83 sq ft, Lot B 8,676.24 sq ft, Lot C 83,13 .91 sq ft, and Lot D 36,901.87 sq ft. Although all lots would have direct access from NE 10t St., the applicant would Orovide an access easement for the future short plats at this time. Location: 5521 & 5603 NE 10TH ST Comments: Daniel Sretzke 1313 33rd Avenue S Seattle, WA 98144 tel: (206) 310-2190 (owner/ applicant / contact) PARTIES OF RECORD BRETZKE-ROGERS LLA LUA06-088, LLA Larry Rogers 5603 NE 10th Street Renton, WA 98059 (owner) Updated: 07/24/06 (Page 1 of 1) ~� Wetland Buffer AM�eraginQ�»�nwmnys�, nnyW� ~~~~~^ ^~~ Jul- � � �w 17 February 2006 �� ���V ��n~`�°~'ED Table of COntents ����'���_���^^��_��'��� Iozaeml�o'1; BufferConditions ~—'^---'^---^--~'-'^—''^-----.^__~,___^__,_...~6 Azd�za]�iuBuffer -'.--_^'_-�-_^...-^^-..---' Ion�seI�o.�� ��rmmn�� ---^'' 7 Image Conditions of EhofferI�edoct�nz2�rea�--~_.'-._-_...-_^_ �������n�n� ^^°y"�� __.__.~,_.~^..._^_.._,__^_._,_______'.2 Figure 1-�i��&8a�~-'-'—'�~'-~~—^---'~''-~~- ~__~______�_._~._.-3 &�ao '�^'--~~-''-~'-' figure �-��{fmr --= ''-�''----'~-'-~-''-~'' 3_Slope ___,__,___.______~___..._~_-13 figureMap ..................................................................................... Figure 4-Ehu�ec .^'-''�-'-~''-~'--'�--'�--�~'-- BERGEP4ABaK*0611 --g- section � -~.-'_.---'.'_-^-..-^-_.--~_-�_.~-._'_'.'--'.._ lntcpc�xc�omz_--'~'--'-'^^—~-�_._^ I[ __.___~____^__.^__~.___^_.__.--.l ioor^u^u°^ ................................._,__�_.__~_._~.._�_4 IV' Site C1�zUitnoms--.~^...-'^._.._-'~-.-~---_�___,______..._6 V. Bo11erAvecaguu8—^--'~'--'^--'^'---'-- �I' - ot�u[ferl0i�±�'-'^----^_'-^--'.---^'—~'-'-'--'' �1����e�mzcu�u��v�"=`"�` ___,__'^-8 �l�^ ^___.___�..._~.__.__..___.~___^__~^.__~___,_.2I o�zm�o�umu°`=�~-^^^---_~___'^__..^___~.._____^__.___�___,__.�___.__~2I �JII ��omn:�zsunm�--'^---^--''--'~-'~~--- 2-2 ... ....... ...... _...... _,____. ........................................ ����'���_���^^��_��'��� Iozaeml�o'1; BufferConditions ~—'^---'^---^--~'-'^—''^-----.^__~,___^__,_...~6 Azd�za]�iuBuffer -'.--_^'_-�-_^...-^^-..---' Ion�seI�o.�� ��rmmn�� ---^'' 7 Image Conditions of EhofferI�edoct�nz2�rea�--~_.'-._-_...-_^_ �������n�n� ^^°y"�� __.__.~,_.~^..._^_.._,__^_._,_______'.2 Figure 1-�i��&8a�~-'-'—'�~'-~~—^---'~''-~~- ~__~______�_._~._.-3 &�ao '�^'--~~-''-~'-' figure �-��{fmr --= ''-�''----'~-'-~-''-~'' 3_Slope ___,__,___.______~___..._~_-13 figureMap ..................................................................................... Figure 4-Ehu�ec .^'-''�-'-~''-~'--'�--'�--�~'-- BERGEP4ABaK*0611 I. Introduction Following the wetland delineation completed by BERGER/ABAM Engineers Inc. (Attachment A) on 17 February 2006, the client, Daniel Bretzke, has requested the completion of a site analysis for the suitability of buffer averaging in accordance with Renton Municipal Code (RMC) (4)(3)(050)(M)(6f) and the associated guidance document The Science of Wetland Buffers and Its Implications for the Management of Wetlands by Andy McMillan (2000). Due to the presence of a large wetland on the southwest half of the subject site and the location of the proposed lot lines; the client is requesting the authorization of buffer averaging in accordance with the Rentor: Municipal Code. Because the characteristics and widths of buffers necessary to maintain aquatic resource health and functions are dependent on site-specific conditions (McMillan, 2000), the site has been analyzed for potential to reduce the standard width for one 340 -square -foot triangular section of buffer. This document provides an assessment of site characteristics and analyzes existing conditions and proposed mitigation to ensure that the regulatory buffer width is sufficient to preserve wetland functions without being larger than necessary. This report has been prepared by BERGER/ABAM Engineers Enc. for exclusive use by Mr. Bretzke as supplemental documentation for land use actions with the City of Renton. No other persons may use the information contained in this report for commercial purposes without express written consent of both BERGER/ABAM Engineers Inc. and Daniel Bretzke. 11. Background Information The subject site is currently divided into three separate tax parcels. The delineated wetland and associated 50 -foot regulatory buffer are situated across all three parcels and occupy more than one-half of the 2.25 -acre subject site (See Figure 1- Site Map). The wetland area is primarily located on Parcel No. 1023059360 (hereby known as parcel "A"). Parcel A is 38,993 square feet in size. Of this, 25,293 square feet are occupied by wetland and 8,335 square feet are regulated as wetland buffer, limiting the development potential of this parcel to 5,365 square feet of area. Due to the location of the wetland, existing site conditions, the orientation of the existing lot lines, and the proposed development design, the applicant is requesting buffer averaging for a specific section of wetland buffer located on Parcel A. See Figure 2 for a site pian identifying the area of proposed buffer reduction and replacement. Wetland Report 17 February 2006 BERGER/ABAK A06112 Page I of I IMMIC SCALE S1 zo 40 60 Jg FGUw ftb4f as wirmPAR w IET VIP OAR A rW3 -"0 1.5 A", A� r— " -F*rL.TTI PJU� J % k 'r r; 701 watvI`I ' 5ANZ711" Sr1EA MAN -1 NA fiR VAL,t W4 TFR VA-' -.-_ wmkar - i Tp -Powimm- W.xcm, m rtaum r ce e w i -.4" L'�.&VA;C WFER -IMT — 11AFIVS, E' or Tm woo -Ir hi SOIL Its T Kr PUZ. 149WED 'if POINAO t1v rrf.c- lr-' f"fJQ A.46 IrAwl-D AS I-k*1r. r.4 F.&O &IZLWV 1:5 R -La. hKLL 4X,%C SLWIZL 8"T"Ifin 7— 'rXNAP& 0' GAJ — 11f1WjO *.AEC UMPT K:7.1 ; TW f�ddb LVO AbUY Amur, mt.mrp a-v�rwff HIONI-DA-AAT CCFBA{A Llfaf biCIAIDUS ME WT WCW rg ECALZ4 SEAeNG MMDM.- A JOE4-14.% W KV,%2'4k'1f &: K T11i EAV SLCf_Sr '.1 •E Wnw- m. TW w Etc. =wn *m !"ri '7 ?'1- scpt L-3AWIS 10?, .1�1-19;15LVMFO• W=Au Ji .rAje amhlre CITY OF RENTON SITE PLAN AN PARCEL A E. Mr.4 ti k4 A A P-r'd 30 40 b9pid ;t :11V,Ll Jg FGUw ftb4f as wirmPAR w IET VIP OAR A rW3 -"0 1.5 A", A� r— " -F*rL.TTI PJU� J % k 'r r; 701 watvI`I ' 5ANZ711" Sr1EA MAN -1 NA fiR VAL,t W4 TFR VA-' -.-_ wmkar - i Tp -Powimm- W.xcm, m rtaum r ce e w i -.4" L'�.&VA;C WFER -IMT — 11AFIVS, E' or Tm woo -Ir hi SOIL Its T Kr PUZ. 149WED 'if POINAO t1v rrf.c- lr-' f"fJQ A.46 IrAwl-D AS I-k*1r. r.4 F.&O &IZLWV 1:5 R -La. hKLL 4X,%C SLWIZL 8"T"Ifin 7— 'rXNAP& 0' GAJ — 11f1WjO *.AEC UMPT K:7.1 ; TW f�ddb LVO AbUY Amur, mt.mrp a-v�rwff HIONI-DA-AAT CCFBA{A Llfaf biCIAIDUS ME WT WCW rg ECALZ4 SEAeNG MMDM.- A JOE4-14.% W KV,%2'4k'1f &: K T11i EAV SLCf_Sr '.1 •E Wnw- m. TW w Etc. =wn *m !"ri '7 ?'1- scpt L-3AWIS 10?, .1�1-19;15LVMFO• W=Au Ji .rAje amhlre VERTICAL DATUO (-W(YJ*NrONS.FNC)qMARK J -'4Q qMT210i I ,O.A')D 399a, •$EZ A* FIN ;K -mi;. ;:;Ytm4.: Figure No. 2- Buffer Averaging Map Map Provided By Applicant PARCEL A Mr.4 ti k4 VERTICAL DATUO (-W(YJ*NrONS.FNC)qMARK J -'4Q qMT210i I ,O.A')D 399a, •$EZ A* FIN ;K -mi;. ;:;Ytm4.: Figure No. 2- Buffer Averaging Map Map Provided By Applicant Ill. Proposed Development The proposed development for this parcel will include the construction of ane single family home. The site is zoned by the City of Renton as R-4, which allows up to four single-family residences per acre. No wetland alterations are being proposed. The proposed development pian will result in necessary buffer impacts, however, these impacts will be minimized and mitigated to the greatest extent possible to allow for reasonable use of the property and the placement of a building footprint while remaining in compliance with other dimensional restrictions imposed by the City of Renton. The proposed single-family residence will primarily be built adjacent to the wetland buffer, and long-term prevention of human intrusion will be maintained by the placement of a split rail fence with attached critical area easement signs prohibiting access to the buffer and wetland. Due to the dimensional limitations of the site the proposal includes the conversion of 340 square feet of wetland buffer to building footprint and the dedication of 340 square feet of lot area as wetland buffer. The proposed development also includes the enhancement of approximately 1,340 square feet of new and existing buffer. See Figure 2 for a diagram of this exchange and enhancement. This proposal will not cause a net loss of wetland buffer area and through enhancement, the proposal will help to better protect areas of the wetland and existing naturally vegetated buffer that provide the function of wildlife habitat. IV. Existing Site Conditions From across the wetland to the west and beginning at the wetland edge, the landscape develops into roiling hills and climbs away from the elevation of the wetland. Land within the buffer ranges from flat to 29 percent slope. The native vegetation on the upland portion of this site has been cleared many years ago for use as pasture and in conjunction with rural development. Currently, that portion of the wetland on Parcel A is naturally buffered by an upland vegetated strip of forested and scrub -shrub canopies that vary in width from 10 to approximately 40 feet beginning at the wetland edge and continuing uphill towards the existing single family residence. This vegetated strip lacks diversity and is primarily made up of Scots broom (Cytisus scoparius), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor), black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera ssp. trichocarpa) saplings, and red alder (AInus rubra). Evidence of past clearing in this area was observed (stumps and charcoal) and the plant communities are not fully established and many of the trees that make up the buffer are still saplings. This existing vegetated buffer would benefit from enhancement, soil amendment, and the removal of invasive species. Beyond this strip of vegetation and further upland within the wetland buffer, the site is heavily impacted by grazing and rural development. Commonly characterized by bare sail and emergent vegetation, erosion and poor soil stability are apparent (See Image No. l: Existing Buffer Conditions). The long presence of ungulates has degraded portions of the wetland buffer by striping it of topsoil and inhibiting regeneration of vegetation in the area. This area would benefit from revegetation through restoration and the removal of grazing animals (See Image No. 2: Grazing Animals in Buffer). Section VII of this Wetland Report BERGER/ABAK A06112 17 February 2006 Page 4 of 4 report describes the applicant's proposed restoration in more detail. Image No. 1. Existing Buffer Conditions Wetland Report 17 February 2006 BERGER/ABAM, A06112 Page 5 of 5 Image No. 2: Graving Animals In Buffer V. Proposed Buffer Averaging Denton Municipal Code (RMC) (4)(3)(050)(M)(6f) states that "Standard wetland buffer zones may be modified by averaging buffer widths. Upon applicant request, wetland buffer width averaging may be allowed by the Department Administrator..." An applicant may request the use of buffer averaging to reduce the wetland buffer in a specific area to help facilitate the placement of a building footprint on a site that is dimensionally limited by wetlands and associated buffers. This provision is especially oriented to a site with varying levels of sensitivity, degraded conditions, and historic uses within the regulatory buffer. There are seven criteria that must be met for an application to be considered for buffer averaging. The criteria are identified below followed by a qualifying statement. That the wetland contains variations in ecological sensitivity or there are existing physical improvements in or near the wetland and buffer. The 50 -foot regulatory buffer surrounding the Honey Creek wetland consists of areas of varying sensitivity. This is due to existing developments within the buffer and degradation of buffer conditions from historic grazing and rural development. The proposed buffer reduction through averaging includes a buffer creation and enhancement element as described in Section VII of this report. Image No. 3 below is a photo of the Wetland Report 17 February 2006 BERGEWABAM, A06I12 Page 6 of 6 conditions of the proposed area of buffer reduction. Image No. 3: Existing Conditions of Proposed Buffer Reduction Area ii. That width averaging will not adversely impact the wetland function and values. The proposed buffer width averaging will result in no net loss of buffer. The proposed averaging will not adversely impact the wetland function and values because the proposed buffer averaging will reduce the buffer in an area that is already impacted and devoid of vegetation and that provides no function or value as buffer. The proposed buffer averaging will also widen the buffer in an area that is vegetated through buffer creation and will enhance the buffer through a buffer enhancement plan providing additional protection to the wetland function and values. See Section VII of this report for a description of the buffer enhancement plan. iii. That the total area contained within the wetland buffer after averaging is no less than that contained within the required standard buffer prior to averaging. The applicant is proposing buffer averaging including a reduction in buffer of up to 50 percentto a triangular width of 25 feet for 340 square feet of wetland buffer and the dedication of additional land as buffer for 340 square feet of nonbuffer area. The total area of wetland buffer after averaging will be the same as the standard required buffer prior to averaging, and there will be no net loss of wetland buffer. Buffer creation and enhancement is also being proposed to ensure a higher quality buffer as the result of this action. See Figure 2 for a site map depicting buffer averaging,. Wetland Report 17 February 2006 BERGER/ABAM, A06I12 Page 7 of 7 iv. A site specific evaluation and documentation of buffer adequacy based upon The Science of Wetland Buffers and Its Implications for the Management of Wetlands, McMillan, 2000, has been conducted. A site specific analysis of buffer adequacy has been completed. See Section VI below. V. In no instance shall the buffer width be reduced by more than fifty percent (50%) of the standard buffer or be Iess than twenty five feet (25) wide. The applicant is proposing buffer averaging including a reduction in buffer of 50 percent to a triangular width of 25 feet, converting 340 square feet of wetland buffer to building footprint. To compensate the applicant is proposing the dedication of additional land as buffer for 340 square feet of area on the same parcel. The applicant is not proposing the reduction of buffer by more than 50 percent or to a width of less than 25 feet. See Figure 2 for a reap of the proposed buffer averaging. vi. Buffer enhancement in the areas where the buffer is reduced shall be required on a case-by- case basis where appropriate to site conditions, wetland sensitivity, and proposed Iand development characteristics. Buffer creation and enhancement in those areas where the buffer will be reduced and in those areas where the buffer will be expanded is being proposed. See section VII below for a complete description of the proposed buffer enhancement. The areas of proposed buffer enhancement is also shown on Figure 2. vii. Notification may be required pursuant to Subsection F8 of this section. The applicant will comply with all noticing requirements of the City of Renton Municipal Code. VI. Site Specific Determination of Buffer Width Table 7 - Wetland Characteristics Record the following information about the wetland under consideration. Wetland area The area of wetland onsite is 34,135 sq. ft. (covering (in acres) the three parcels surveyed) and is part of a large wetland complex that extends south and west of the subject site. The total area has not been determined due to the scope of the completed delineation. Wetland rating (class/category) This wetland has been referenced by the City of and name of rating system Renton as a Type II wetland in existing documents. Hydrogeomorphic Class Riverine (riverine, depressional, slope, lacustrine fringe, estuarine fringe) Cowardin classes present (forested, Forested and scrub -shrub Wedand Report BERGERJABAK A06112 17 February 2006 Page 8 of 8 the following information about the wetland under mergent, open bed) lent open water None ai open water None Area of vegetated standing water Hard to quantify. Small pockets of vegetated Stan water exist but are well dispersed. Source(s) of water input to the Honey Creek, intermittent streams, surface sheet wetland flow, groundwater. Threatened/Endangered%Sensitive None known. or rare plant species present Threatened/Endangered/Sensitive None observed. Among others, bald eagle (Haiiaeetus or rare animal species present leucocephaius) and pileated woodpecker (Dryocopus pileatus) may occasionally use this site as habitat. Known or expected bird species Expected bird species that may use this site as utilizing the wetland as habitat habitat include American robin (Tardus migratorius), wren (Troglodytes), and several other migratory species. However, a bird survey was not completed due to the scope of the project. A complete list of expected birds can be found in the King County Wildlife Habitat Profile, 1987. Known or expected mammal Field observations support the presence of mammals species utilizing the wetland as due to the presence of scat and tracks. However, a habitat mammal survey was not completed due to the scope of this project. Expected species include deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus), raccoon (Procyon lotor), and coyote (Calais latrans). A complete list of expected mammals can be found in the King County Wildlife Habitat Profile, 1987. Known or expected fish species None known. The nearest aquatic habitat that would utilizing the wetland as habitat support fish life is May Creek. Known or expected herptile species The presence of the northwestern salamander utilizing the wetland as habitat (Ambystoma gracile) and the long -toed salamander (Ambystoma macrodactylum) within the buffer area are possible due to the presence of the adjacent wetland. Additionally, garter snakes (Thamnophis spp.) and northern alligator lizard (Eigaria coerulea) may also be present; however, a herptile study was not completed due to the limited scope of this study. A complete list of expected herptiies can be found in the King County Wildlife Habitat Profile, 1987. Wedand Report BERGER/ABAK A06112 17 February 2006 Page 9 of 9 STEP 2; Describe the level of impact from adjacent development and measures to be taken to minimize impacts TahIP- R - nPSr-rintinn of Potential Develonment Imnaets Describe the type of Construction of one single-family residence, including development a split rail fence to restrict entry into the wetland buffer. Describe how surface water Currently, due to the degraded condition of the buffer, runoff will be addressed improvements made through the proposed buffer Including plans for treatment enhancement plan will improve buffer conditions and release to wetlands or through increased sediment and nutrient capture and streams. uptake. Surface water collected from roof and storm drains associated with the development of this site will be addressed through the City of Renton stormwater review. The applicant has indicated that soil conditions 4 on site are amenable to infiltration. No additional ` surface water is anticipated to be released to the =� buffer or wetland as a result of this development. Describe how surface runoff No additional surface water is anticipated to be will affect the hydroperiod of released to the buffer or wetland as a result of this • the wetland and what development. pollutants might be Introduced ` into the wetland. Describe the potential for Some light and glare from the adjacent proposed noise and light to affect the residential development may affect the wetland and wetland and steps taken to buffer. The City of Renton Code allows the Reviewing -. reduce noise and light Impacts Official to condition permits "directing lights from on the wetland. buildings or parking areas, or noise generating activities, away from wetlands". The applicant will comply with all conditions placed on the building permit. Additionally, the proposed site plan focuses all residential activities to the northeast side of the property on the opposite side of the structure from the wetland. Describe the potential for A split rail fence to restrict entry into the wetland and human and pet intrusion into buffer will be constructed in conjunction with the the wetland and steps taken to placement of critical areas signs along the fence and w' minimize intrusion. buffer boundary. This will assist in restricting access to the buffer and wetland, and will also raise awareness ;..- of the importance of protecting wetland resources. Wetland Report 17 February 2006 $ERGER/ASAM, A06112 Page 10 of 10 STEP 3: Describe the characteristics of the buffer he area within 300 feet of the wetland edge in the vicinity of the proposed development and answer the questions below. Make a drawing to answer questions 21-22 �# 1. Described the mapped soil type There are three soils located on Draw a typical soil a ; including horizons, texture and or near this site as mapped by horizon brown gravelly sandy loam. From drainage class. the Soil Survey of King County (0-20') for Area (Gale, Pringle, and Snyder; the buffer soils consolidated glacial till 1973). The mapping symbols characteristic (hardpan). Soil =# -' and slope classes of the three permeability is rapid in surface `3 Alderwood subgroups are: See data sheets material and very slow in the from wetland Tg 4 AgB: 0% to 6% Slopes delineation report. AgC: 6% to 15% Slopes capacity is seasonally low AgD: 15% to 30%: Slopes = The King Conservation District (winter). (King Conservation describes Alderwood soils as: "Moderately well -drained soils underlain by consolidated glacial till (hardpan) at a depth of 24 to ^_ 40 inches. Alderwood soils formed in glacial deposits under conifers. They occupy upland areas at elevations between 1.00 and 800 feet. The annual precipitation is 35 to 60 inches, - mostly rainfall between October and May. The frost free season is 150 to 200 days." (King Conservation District) Wetland Report BERGMABAK A06112 17 February 2006 Page 11 of 11 Atypical alderwood soil profile from 0 to 27 inches is a dark 4ASF .C_, brown gravelly sandy loam. From 27 to 60 inches, the soil takes a grayish brown weakly to strongly consolidated glacial till characteristic (hardpan). Soil =# -' permeability is rapid in surface .#.. layer and subsoil above hardpan _�..:.;. material and very slow in the hardpan. The depth to the seasonal high water table is 2 to 3 feet and the water -holding capacity is seasonally low (summer) to seasonally high (winter). (King Conservation District). Observations made on Wetland Report BERGMABAK A06112 17 February 2006 Page 11 of 11 Table 9 - Buffer Characteristics Evaluate the area within 300 feet of the wetland edge in the vicinity of the proposed development and answer the questions below. Make a drawing to answer questions 21-22 the landscape scale and during i soil sampling were generally consistent with the descriptions provided in the Soil Survey of King County Area and by the King Conservation District. 2i Do field observations confirm Yes. the mapped soil type? 2 if not, describe soil type = observed In the field Including horizons, texture and drainage class. SLOPE 2.1; On a drawing of the buffer area, <5% show areas where the slope Is: 5% -10% See Figure No. 3 attached. >10% VEGETATION r r. h M 22 On a drawing of the buffer area, The site buffer is estimated to be 40% shrub, 30% Indicate approximate percent of forested, and 25% herbaceous mixed with bare. aerial cover of each vegetative strata as well as bare areas and Strata, areas with buildings or Tree Impervious surfaces Shrub Herbaceous See Figure No. 4 attached. Bare Buildings/impervious 23 Describe measures that could The buffer could be enhanced through the removal of be taken to improve the invasive species and the planting and maintenance of functioning of the buffer area. native vegetation. See section VII for a complete description of the proposed buffer restoration plan. Wetland Report 17 February 2006 BERGER/ABAM, A06112 Page 12 of 12 E 10thlStreet Legend Source: King County GIS, Puget Sound Lidar Consortium, Surveyed Parcel Lines Slope GeoDimensions Site Survey � Wetland Boundary =`5% Figure No. 3- Slope Map BURGER/ARAM 50 Foot Wetland Buffer =5-10% E N G I M E E R 3 N C County Tax Parcel Lines i > 10% 1 inch equals 50 feet 4160 s? G L y a Co ED @ @ m O �W STEP 4: Determine the buffer functions and width needed to protect the wetland Table Based on the information recorded in Tables 7, 8 and 9 above, determine which buffer functions are needed to protect the wetland. For each function determined to be needed, describe the width necessary to protect the wetland and provide a rationale for the width selected. Include a description of enhancement activities proposed to improve the buffer or otherwise protect the wetland. M Yes The function of sediment removal See section VII below. Sedlment removal from surface water sheet flows is not being provided by the Additionally, the applicant will wetland buffer in its current provide for storrnwater condition. The buffer is degraded and lacking emergent vegetation infiltration, detention and or grasses in many locations and treatment in compliance with erosion is apparent. The the City of Renton adopted regulatory buffer for this wetland Stormwater Manual and is currently set at 50 feet through prevent flow from lawns and standard application of code by surfaces that directly enters the City of Renton regardless of the buffer. buffer condition. This is a proposal for buffer The applicant will also use averaging, including a reduction best management practices of buffer width to 25 feet for a to control dust during specific section of buffer that is construction. currently in a degraded condition and the addition of buffer in an area that is adjacent to an established forested community. This proposal also includes buffer enhancement for the area adjacent to the buffer reduction and for the area of buffer dedication. Following the completion and establishment of the enhanced buffer, and due to the improved vegetated condition of the buffer, a 25 -foot enhanced buffer will be more effective at providing water quality function (sediment removal) than the existing standard 50 -foot buffer with no enhancement. It is also important to note that this is a request for buffer Wetland Report BERGERIABAK A06112 17 February 2006 Page 15 of 15 Table Buffer Functions Based on the information recorded in Tables 7,8 and 9 above, determine which buffer functions are needed to protect the wetland. For each function determined to be needed, describe the width necessary to protect the wetland and provide a rationale for the width selected. Include a description of enhancement activities proposed to improve the buffer or otherwise protect the wetland. averaging through a reduction in buffer width for a specific section of the current regulatory buffer. The applicant is proposing additional buffer dedication to compensate for the site-specific reduction of buffer. The applicant is not proposing any impacts to the wetland. Yes The function of nutrient removal See Section VII below. Nutrient removal from surface water sheet flows is not being provided by the wetland buffer in its current condition. The buffer is degraded and devoid of vegetation in many locations and there is no ability to provide this function. This is a proposal for buffer averaging including a reduction of buffer width to 25 feet for a specific section of buffer that is currently in a degraded condition and the addition of buffer in an area that is adjacent to an established forested community. This proposal also includes buffer enhancement for the area adjacent to the buffer reduction and for the area of buffer dedication. Following the completion and establishment of the enhanced buffer, and due to the improved vegetated condition of the buffer, a 25 -foot enhanced buffer will be more effective at providing water quality function (nutrient removal) than the existing standard 50 -foot buffer with no enhancement. Wetlarnd Report BERGER/ABAK A06112 17 February 2006 Page 16 of 16 Table 1 - Buffer Functions Based on the information recorded in Tables 7, 8 and 9 above, determine which bufferfunct ions are needed to protect the wetland. For each function determined to be needed, describe the width necessary to protect the wetland and provide a rationale for the width selected. Include a description of enhancement activities proposed to improve the buffer or otherwise protect the wetland. It It is also important to note that this is a request for buffer through a reduction in buffer width for a specific section of the current regulatory buffer. The applicant is proposing additional buffer dedication to compensate for the site-specific reduction of buffer. The applicant is not proposing any impacts to the wetland. Yes The function of toxics removal See Section VII below. Toxics removal from surface water sheet flows is (specify type of not being provided by the Additionally, the applicant will toxic substance) wetland buffer in its current comply with the adopted City of condition. The buffer is degraded Renton Stormwater Manual and and devoid of vegetation in many use provisions in this manual locations and the buffer does not that ensure the routing of all have the ability or capacity to new untreated runoff away from provide this function. Currently, the wetland and its buffer. The water flows freely across the applicant will also explore the compacted soil in the buffer potential to establish a covenant area. requiring the use of integrated pest management and limiting This is a proposal for buffer the use of pesticides and averaging including a reduction herbicides to outside of the of buffer width to up to 25 feet regulated buffer. for a specific triangular section of buffer that is currently in a degraded condition and the addition of buffer in an area that is adjacent to an established forested community. This proposal also includes buffer enhancement for the area adjacent to the buffer reduction and for the area of buffer dedication. Following the completion and establishment of the enhanced buffer, and due to the improved vegetated condition of the buffer, a 25 foot enhanced buffer will be Wetland Report BERGER/ABAM, A06112 17 February 2006 Page 17 of 17 Table 1 - Buffet Functions Based on the information recorded in Tables 7, 8 and 9 above, determine which buffer functions are needed to protect the wetland. For each function determined to be needed, describe the width necessary to protect the wetland and provide a rationale for the width selected. Include a description of enhancement activities proposed to improve the buffer or otherwise protect the wetland. more effective at providing water quality function (toxics removal) than the existing standard 50 - foot buffer with no enhancement. It is also important to note that this is a request for buffer averaging through a reduction in buffer width for a specific section of the current regulatory buffer. The applicant is proposing additional buffer dedication to compensate for the site-specific reduction of buffer. The applicant is not proposing any impacts to the wetland. Yes The function of shading and See Section VII below. Shading & microclimate protection is not microclimate being provided in full by the protection wetland buffer in its current condition. The buffer is degraded and devoid of vegetation in many locations and there is limited ability to provide this function. Some sections of the buffer are forested and do provide this function. This is a proposal for buffer averaging, including a reduction of buffer width to 25 feet for a specific section of buffer that is currently in a degraded condition and the addition of buffer in an area that is adjacent to an established forested community. The applicant is not proposing the removal of existing vegetation and is proposing a reduction of buffer in an area that is already impacted. This proposal also includes buffer enhancement for the area adjacent to the buffer reduction Wetland Report BERGEWABAM, A06112 17 February 2006 Page 18 of 18 Table 1 Buffer Based on the information recorded in Tables 7, 8 and 9 above, determine which buffer functions are needed to protect the wetland. For each function determined to be needed, describe the width necessary to protect the wetland and provide a rationale for the width selected. Include a description of enhancement activities proposed to improve the buffer or otherwise protect the wetiand. and for the area of buffer dedication. Following the completion and establishment of the enhanced buffer, and due to the improved vegetated condition of the buffer, a 25-foot enhanced buffer will be more effective at providing shading & microciimate protection than the existing standard 50 foot buffer with no enhancement. It is also important to note that this is a request for buffer averaging through a reduction in buffer width for a specific section of the current regulatory buffer. The applicant is proposing additional buffer dedication to compensate for the site-specific reduction of buffer. The applicant is not proposing any impacts to the wetland. Yes Because of habitat provided by See Section VII below. Screening noise, the wetland and associated light, intrusion buffer, this function will need to be preserved and enhanced. By Additionally, the applicant will orienting the home away from the design the single -family wetland and restricting access residence to locate activity that through preservation easement, generates noise away from the wetland intrusion and impact wetland and will direct all lights from noise will be limited. The associated with the structure will also help serve as a development away from the noise harrier from other wetland. Permanent fencing will developments located further also be installed, and through upland from this single -family enhancement, dense vegetation home. will be planted to help delineate the buffer edge and discourage This is a proposal for buffer disturbance. averaging, including a reduction of buffer width of up to 25 feet for a specific triangular section of Wedand Report BERGER/ABAK A06112 17 February 2006 Page 19 of 19 able 10 - Buffer Functir. Based on the information recorded in Tables 7, 8 and 9 above, determine which buffer functions are needed to protect the wetland. For each function determined to be needed, describe the width necessary to protect the wetland and provide a rationale for the width selected. Include a description of enhancement activities proposed to improve the buffer or otherwise protect the wetland. buffer. Due to the applicant's intended diligence in site design through low impact development and buffer enhancements, this minor reduction in buffer is not expected to impact the noise, light, and screening function of this wetland buffer. Yes In its current state, the wetland General wiidliffe buffer provides differing levels of See Section VII below. habitat protection based on its condition Additionally, the applicant will at different locations. This is a design the single-family proposal for buffer averaging, including a reduction of buffer residence to locate activity width of up to 25 feet fora that generates noise away specific triangular section of from the wetland and will buffer. Due to the applicants direct all lights associated intended diligence in site design with the development away through low impact development from the wetland. Permanent and buffer enhancements, this fencing will also be installed, minor reduction in buffer is not and through enhancement, expected to impact the habitat dense vegetation will be function of this wetland buffer. planted to help delineate the buffer edge and discourage disturbance. No N/A N/A Habitat for particular species Wetland Report BERGER/ABAK A06112 17 February 2006 Page 20 of 20 provides little functional value and protection in its current condition and is proposing the preservation of the buffer through protective measures for generations to come. iX. References Gale, Pringle, and Snyder. 1973. Soil Survey of King County Area, Washington. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. King Conservation District. 2000. Kang County Soil Descriptions. (htW://www.kingcd.orgZl2ub sciE.htm) King County. 1987. Wildlife habitat profile. King County Open Space Program. Parks, Planning, and Resource Department, Seattle, Washington. McMillan, A. 2000. The science of wetland buffers and its implications for the management of wetlands. Master's Thesis. The Evergreen State College. Washington State Department of Ecology. 1993. "Restoring Wetlands in Washington' Ecology Publications #93-17. Wetland Report 17 February 2006 BERGEWABAK A06112 Page 22 of 22 Y Kathy Keolker, Mayor February 21, 2007 Daniel Bretzke 1313 33`d Avenue S Seattle, WA 98144 CITY )F RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: Bretzke-Rogers Lot Line Adjustment City of Renton File No. LUA06-088, LLA Dear Mr. Bretzke: The City of Renton has completed processing the above referenced lot line adjustment and has forwarded the final mylars to King County for recording. Please note the recording of the lot line adjustment map alone does not transfer ownership of property. If necessary, prepare and record a deed transferring ownership of the portion of land depicted in the lot line adjustment map. City Staff recommends that the legal description for this document be prepared by a surveyor. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure this document is properly prepared and recorded with the County. If you have any further questions regarding this lot line adjustment, please contact me at (425) 430-7270. cerely, Andrea Petzel, Planner Development Services Division cc: City of Renton File No. LUA06-088, LLA Larry Rogers, Owner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98457 ® This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% postconsumer RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE, CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: February 21, 2007 TO: City Clerk's Office FROM: Andrea Petzel P/B/PW - Development/Planning, x7270 SUBJECT: Bretzke-Rogers Lot Line Adjustment LUA 06-088 Attached please find two sets of the above -referenced mylar and three copies for recording with King County. Please have Consolidated Delivery & Logistics, Inc. take these documents via: Priority service ($22.46) Rush service ($17.94) X Economy service ($15.73) Attached is a check for the amount of $15.73 for the fee to CD&L. According to Finance, the King County recording fees for this and all subsequent plat recordings should be charged to account #000/007.590.0060.49.000014. Please call me at x7270 if you have any questions. Thank you. cc: Yellow file Jan Conklin, Development Services Sonja Fesser, Property Services H:1Division.slDevelop.seADev&plan.ing\PROJECT5106-088.Valeriel5 Clerk Memo.doc Kathy Keolker, Mayor February 2, 2007 Daniel Bretzke 1313 33rd Avenue S Seattle, WA 9$144 CITI 3F RENTON Planning/Building/PublieWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: Mylar Request for Bretzke Lot Line Adjustment City of Renton File No. LUA06-088, LLA Dear Mr. Bretzke: The City has finished reviewing your proposed lot line adjustment and is now ready to approve and send the final version for recording, subject to the changes requested in the attached memo. Please submit two sets of an original signed mylar and a check for $15.73 made out to CD&L to me at the sixth floor counter of City Hall. Please verify that the mylars have been signed by all owners of record and have been notarized with an ink stamp (not embossed). The ink stamp must be legible so that King County will promptly record the lot line adjustment. This decision to approve the proposed lot line adjustment is subject to a fourteen (14) day appeal period from the date of this letter. Any appeals of the administrative decision must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5:00 pm, February 16, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Hearing Examiner appeals are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430- 6510. If you have further questions regarding this project, please call me at (425) 430-7270. Sincerely, C'", Andrea Petzel, Planner Development Services Division cc: City of Renton File No. LUA06-088, LLA 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 This papercontains 50% recycled material. 30% post consumer RENTaN AHEAD OF THE- CURVE L] CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: January 5, 2007 TO: Sonja Fesser, Engineering Specialist FROM: Andrea Petzel, Assistant Planner x7289 SUBJECT: Bretzke-Roger Lot Line Adjustment LUA06-088 Attached is the most recent version of the above -referenced lot line adjustment. If all Property Services concerns have been addressed and you are now able to recommend recording of the mylar, please sign this memo below and return to me as soon as possible. However, if you have outstanding concerns or require additional information in order to recommend recording, please let me know. Thank you. Property Services approval:'' Robert T. Mac Onie, Jr. PLS Date 11vp7 Sonja) esse Date cc: Yellow File 4c'J"e M H:(Division.slDevelop.sertDev&plan.ing\AAPILot Line Adjustmentl3 Approval Request Memo.doc CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: January 18, 2007 TO: Valerie Kinast FROM: Bob Mac Onie C. S 1 UBJECT: Bretzke-Rogers Lot Line Adjustment, LUA-06088-LLA Format and Legal Description Review Sonja J. Fesser and I have reviewed the above referenced lot line adjustment submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant: Pursuant to the recently revised WAC 196-23-020; the expiration date now needs to be applied manually. Any Final document must contain the seal/stamp, handwritten license expiration date by the licensee[,] signature and date of signature of the licensee who prepared or directly supervised the work. For the purpose of this section "document" is defined as plans, specifications, plats, surveys[,] as -built documents prepared by the licensee[,] and reports. IH:1File Sys1LND - Land Subdivision & Surveying Records%LND-30 - Lot Line Adjustments103181RV070118.doc CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGIBUILDINGIPUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: November 21, 2006 TO: Valerie Kinast FROM: Sonja J. Fesser� S 1 UBJECT: Bretzke-Rogers Lot Line Adjustment, LUA-06-088-LLA Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced lot line adjustment submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Annlicant: The existing and adjusted new lot lines for all of the lots (Sheet 2 of 2) are difficult to see. Said lines are barely discernable on the review document we received. Adjust as is needed. There are also several other lines extending southerly from the private ingress, access and utilities easement (Lots C and D) which serves no obvious purpose. The surveyor should stamp the draft submittal and note that it is a "DRAFT" or "PRELIMINARY". The scale is noted as 1" = 40'. The drawing is not shown at that scale. The references to the existing "PARCELS" (A, B, C and D) on the lot line adjustment submittal (Sheet 2 of 2) includes too much information that is not needed. Remove the tax lot numbers, the area and zoning information. Also, the arrows noting the existing lot lines should be removed. The "LEGEND" and drawing are not in agreement (the "NEW PROPERTY LINE" is not shown on the drawing with a dark line, the "CENTERLINE OF ROAD" does not note the "CL" on the drawing, the "EDGE OF WETLANDS" line is not noted at the same scale on the drawing, etc.). Note, on the lot line adjustment drawing, that the "INGRESS, EGRESS EASEMENT" is new and private. Add "UTILITIES" to the easement reference, if it applies. Remove "IS TO BE CREATED UPON THE RECORDING OF THIS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT" from the PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS & UTILITIES MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT block (Sheet 1 of 2). Said easement is established when the 1RARc SyALND - Land Subdivision & Surveying Record-\LND-34 - Lot tine Adju5tmentsl03 C SIRV061 i l l .dnc November 30, 2006 Page 2 property owners quitclaim to each other those subject properties newly adjusted and encumbered by the proposed easement. See the attachments for circled items that need to be corrected. Provide a means of locating the wetland boundary (NGPE) and buffer (?) on the drawing. Comments for the Project Manager: Is therip vate "Agreement Between Daniel and Fumiko Bretzke and Larry Rogers" document to be recorded with the lot line adjustment? If it is, then reference said document on the lot line adjustment submittal, and provide a space for the recording number thereof. If not, then have the two property owners record said document themselves after the LLA recording. NOTE: Said document notes a dimension (30' X 174') for the quitclaim area between the two property owners. Is that correct? Sewer easements are also mentioned in the agreement document. Are they to be noted on future short plat submittals? No Is explicit access language needed (on the LLA submittal) for the City to access the NGPE area`? Pt -0 Does the wetland need to be buffered, and how wide should said buffer be? HAFile Sys1LND - Land subdivision & Surveying RecordALND-30 - Lot Line Adjustments103181RV061121.docicor ti J M W q'i -Ib— cc at ❑ m r�nQiUuiL LUQz H U❑3JEp U J Q J W U-1 lu En cc cn tc Z -z( w LU cl LuF--U] �~ LIZIalZI 0� '`i Os HwLQLjwLuj °iwz°Ezw ❑ ❑�Qz� LL Q 4 :o Q ED Cc LU Ui t ti 9 tuj o r'w Q wvaw (�oLLucc tiZk� H z W O Ct J"2 H LL O J Q H � -i CL} LuEnJ�,U) uj-T za w LIJ Q Q MUJz �U:� �2 w= 0 CL LLI I- Z En LU Z qa Qo �� H�xo Qx'J= EnZJti wv�zz Z Q En W U En U ti M Ez-r [Lij LEIZIu aw z Z Luau w zwoXvi�� w QUw=Lwu 3 Z F -I CL Q- azo o J-4 cu -cx CrL awwc-cDz LUHOZI~-3f� ZQCiUMQ a J a. ac En I- Lu ❑ 2 a U Q Cc cr z F- -I- lu Cc It En �U(n�O�� CL Z Q Z ❑. Q Q -1-4z WzQ1-4 Q aZoQ2t �LAJ UZ Z CLw�JlZu LU-iHEnLLgLSU W " CL w�UtZ--�tuuQ EnOZHULuEn WELHz CLLu U Ul a F- L1 a -.i (i w¢ Z Z Z Iq Q a: - U] a EL H w w E= Er LL J w x �- QLLIQ ZwQ�- Q UZZaZZZQ❑zOC�h= �XWQQQU7ccED:z:z J ui. �E "CE Q I- I- t: LL w Q..Z.. QD 7"D..H.4-44--0 2LLW-4I- z I-t-3a:z ti❑U QHZzEn wEn zz�o cc C) OOL1.tLL,wLL�LtIZHC']I-]- Hz U�UcnaF-Q a Z�`-LEIwQaw'4 Q�1-.J 0LU cc 0LE1�w4ZQ cnUUQcn�aX W4 Ln w 1- -T 4- Lj w` %x3co�zw�z •a io it (r) o •ate CL IuCE: QEDCCr •ZZU7CL (Dzw¢f�-z WC)UQuWoww zQZwz�w"- -Lll-tea, ZQ-i LuQ LuI-cr ~ Lu j Q U �I� -j (X �LU���-rlx-�zUQwLLQWz (n Lu �- uj Q LU z �- LU �- Lu ]H- Q �b, 0 I-- Enol-ccJ ♦ UJEnZ•LLQ= +-iQH+--�Qit wow I-- - EnULuat(iu,Lu zHULUZW E)Et C❑ (n LL (XOJ�-LULuw❑Lu z - mctF-4 �ZzzwX .a I� F- Ell I-- no � 3 F- I-- Q F- En UZCL gQHO w I,Lu wiucDz�-F-w �0-z�b-ZzZ I-QZbiLUEn-qwcnF-+oowE- 0- U] � Q. I- FUi E -t w Q p Zwwww-jZU-c w0ZE �ZZ -"A-UnM az- "F - CC �E-LULu�--, Z4Q-oa[r� W O cn En Z F-- LL zr z '-I m U) z to�ul'z❑E3Lu Lu 4 z W z I- I- CL >- �qaxzz``WLLLD�aQz +LuHl-w cnOwU CLW Lu � zaa Cc W CT LL LEI w Q ZJLE) w1 --j JQcaI-Jw - Q un z Q Q W J vn LU Z JZZ-CC (3) L IZ-�QJ( QQmoz�EnEn MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APPROVALS: APPROVED THIS __ DAY OF _ 2006. CITY ENTON ADMINSTRA TOR -PLANNING/ ILDLIN PUBLIC WORKS KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS EXAMINED AND APPROVED TNI. � DA Y OF , 2006 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR DEPUTY ICING COUNTY ASSESSO TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. 102305-9359 TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. 102305.-9358 TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. 102305-9357 TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. 102305-9360 RECOM01-NGNO, CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD THIS _ DAY OF - , 2006 IN BOOK _OF A T PAGE A T THE REQUEST OF ED WIN J. GREEN JR.. MANAGER SUPT OF R LLI 0 z v I titih.ti � � 0 LU Z LU cv Q i~ `z C z LL cc:c) I .� I zw� ❑zz �E Q �caCJQ E- ❑ ui oaoo Lij Eni Vj ;AJJ„I Z� 0 H ly w � I wwz0. wz �H EDIca ZMQ, LU Lu En -- Lu Im �a (DQZ)cc 0QQEnnLu 4 0 I C QCxc)wz C) w wzMC) a n z .90 OET Cll .90'63; 3.21r.20.00N QC]��M 4Y[rSVG ICO a o Ltjm Fin 0 c �o `v a wra 0 o, z�-o'QU �zzloQ I ¢wquz H Qw�ww w3r4 x QF`Cl; LU lU' Ul LL 4 I X � 14 0. U M 0 I . O �r . ID (D W i lrf LLI 0 z titih.ti � o000 LU Z i~ `z C �tr) M I ©�+ o �E Q �caCJQ oaoo Vj ;AJJ„I Z� 0 ly w cr U Uw � wz �H EDIca ZMQ, Im �a 0 .90 OET I .90'63; 3.21r.20.00N ICO a o 0 c a o, LLI 0 z Daniel Bretzke 1313 33rd Ave S Seattle, WA 98133 Valerie Kinast Planning and Public Works Department 1055 S Grady WA Renton WA 98055 August 11, 2006 RE Lot A wetland buffer averaging Draft Buffer Planting Plan. Dear Ms. Kinast (j ,--(- � 2. tte r` -S c t L r A AUG 16 20M RECSVIIED Please find the a draft buffer averaging plan. This plan includes the following: A site plan showing location of native plants to be planted to enhance the buffer, plants to plant in the replacement buffer A graphic showing approximate location of building foot print area, buffer enhancement area and buffer replacement area Detail Sheets from WSU native plant guide. The final buffer planting plan will be submitted with the building permit application for this lot. Sincerely Daniel Bretzke, Vegetation planting Plan List Trees Number Size Bitter Cherry 3 5' Western Red Cedar 2 5-6 Pacific Dogwood 3 4-5' Shrubs Number Size Bunch Cherry 10 2 gallon Western Service Berry 15 2 gallon Ground Cover Number Size Twin Flower 50 4" Lady Fern 50 4" Dear Fern 50 4' Wild Ginger 40 4" 00O&OIN.lIIa►F 9FPi[i Prunus emarginata var, mollis bitter cherry, narrowleaf cherry Page 1 of 1 Description: This deciduous native grows as a large shrub or small tree, to heights of 20-50 feet tall, and has shiny, reddish -brown bark with thin, horizontal stripes. Leaves are alternate, 2-4 inches long, oval to oblong, with rounded tips and fine teeth on the margins; and bright to dark -green in color, turning bright -yellow in the autumn before they fall. Flowers are small, white to pinkish, and form loose, flat-topped clusters of 5-10 flowers. The small cherries are bright -red when ripe, Another cherry native to Western Washington is P. virginiana var. demissa (common chokecherry), which can be distinguished from P. emarginata by its flowers and fruit being in long clusters of more than ten, its darker (purple to black) cherries, and its strikingly silver bark. Habitat: Both species occur on dry to moist sites, in full sun to partial shade, though P. virginiana prefers settings that are slightly more open. Both are intolerant of full shade. Advantages/Disadvantages: P. emarginata makes a stately ornamental tree in open, conifer forests. The fruits of both species are an important food source for birds and small mammals (especially in early winter), and deer and elk feed on the leaves and twigs. Provides nesting sites for cavity- nesting birds, mammals, and sometimes bees. Plants are short-lived (40- 60 years). Propagation: Both species grow best from seed. Collect fruit when fully mature (July to September for P. emarginata; late August to September for P. virginiana). Remove pulp, keep soaking time to a minimum to avoid damage to seeds. Sow liberally in the fall. Seed not sown in the fall must be cold -stratified for 3-4 months to break seed dormancy. Seedlings under six feet tall can be salvaged. Suitable Growing Environment: partial shade and well -drained soils (canopy) sun and moist soils (canopy) sun and well -drained soils (canopy) Main Menu Classifications http://cahedb.wsu,edu/nativePlant/scripts/webDisplayText.asp?ID=nv015 8/11/2006 Page 1 of 1 Prunus emarginata var. mollis (Click on picture for full size.) http:Hcahedb.wsu.edu/nativePlant/scripts/webDisplayThumbs.asp?ID=nvo 15 8/11/2006 WSU CAHE Native Plant Th uja plicata western redcedar, Pacific redcedar, giant arborvitae Page I of 1 Description: This evergreen conifer can grow over 200 feet tall, with a massive (3-10 feet in diameter) tapering trunk that flares at the base to form buttresses. Bark is thin, shaggy, reddish, and easily peels off into long strips. Needles are flat, overlapping like scales, and are shiny bright -green above, and paler on the underside with white markings. The needles form flattened sprays on drooping branches that turn up at the tips. Cones are clustered near the ends of branches, and are bluish -green when young, becoming brown, half-inch, tulip - shaped cones with woody scales. Habitat: Prefers moist to swampy soils. Full sun to full shade, though seedlings require some shade. Tolerates seasonal flooding and perennially -saturated soils. Advantages/Disadvantages: Aromatic, long-lived (up to 1000 years), and fairly rot - resistant. An excellent choice for wetland and riparian sites, as it thrives in wetter soils better than other evergreens. Forms a shallow, widely -spreading root system, and creates exceptionally durable, large woody debris in streams and on the forest floor. Though it naturally becomes a massive tree, it responds to pruning by sprouting new foliage along the trunk (unlike many conifers), and so can be made into a hedge. Seeds are eaten by numerous species of birds. Deer and elk browse seedlings. Provides nesting sites and cover for many species of birds and small mammals. Plants host butterfly caterpillars. Despite its shallow roots, it tends to be windfinn except in very wet sites. Propagation: Easily grown from seeds or by layering. Collect cones early September to October, and dry to remove seeds. Do not de -wing the seeds. Seeds can be sown right away, or in the spring without any pretreatment. Seedlings under three feet tall salvage well. Hardwood cuttings can also be used. Suitable Growing Environment: deep shade and moist soils (canopy) partial shade and well -drained soils (canopy) sun and moist soils (canopy) Main Menu Classifications http://cahedb.wsu.cdu/nativePlant/scripts/webDisplayText.asp?ID=nv024 8/11/2006 Page 1 of 1 Thuja plicata (Click on picture for full size.) http://cahedb.wsu.edu/nativePlant/scripts/webDisplayThumbs.asp?ID=nvO24 8/11/2006 WSU CAHE Native Plant Cornus n uttallii Pacific dogwood, western flowering dogwood, mountain dogwood Page 1 of 1 Description: This deciduous tree usually grows 20-30 feet tall with an irregularly shaped trunk and smooth, dark bark that develops rectangular scales with age. Twig ends curve upward, and branchings are often in whorls of four, making branch tips look somewhat like candelabras. Leaves are opposite, 3-5 inches long, generally oval with a sharp tip, and deep to bright green above, paler below. Leaf veins are in opposite pairs that parallel the curves of the leaf, and leaf edges are smooth or wavy. In autumn, leaves turn dull- to pinkish -red before falling. Trees flower April to June, and some individuals flower a second time in August or September. When in flower, trees are covered with numerous sets of four to six large (3/4 - 2% inches long), creamy white to pale pink floral leaves which encircle the inconspicuous true flowers (which are small and greenish -white). Clusters of plum -like fruits are produced in the fall. Habitat: Moist, well -drained soils. Partial to full shade. A common understory tree in open to fairly dense, mixed forests, though it may not produce fruit in heavy shade. Found throughout most of our region. Advantages/Disadvantages: Its attractive branching pattern, flowers, fruits, and fall foliage make this a beautiful tree in all seasons. Once established, it can do without summer watering, and is long-Iived (to 150 years). Very shade tolerant. Plants host butterfly caterpillars. Birds, especially band -tailed pigeons, eat fruit clusters. Deer browse on twigs and foliage. Many trees develop a fungal infection which causes large, brown blotches on the leaves and sometimes premature death of the plant. Trunks must be protected against damage from lawn mowers, as this can expose trees to the fungus. Trunks should also be partially shaded to prevent sunburn damage. Propagation: Seed is the best method. Collect fruit as soon as ripe (September to October), before the birds get them. One source says they can be sown as is, while another recommends removing the pulp. Plants under three feet high can be salvaged. Plants in your yard can probably be multiplied by layering small branches. Suitable Growing Environment: partial shade and well -drained soils (canopy) sun and moist soils (canopy) sun and well -drained soils (canopy) Mai3i Menu Classifications http://cahedb.wsu.edu/nativePlanVscripts/webDisplayText.asp?ID=nv007 8/11/2006 WSU CAHE Native Plant Cornus unalaschkensis Page 1 of 1 (formerly called C. canadensis var. intermedia, but see note under Propagation) bunchberry, bunchberry dogwood, dwarf dogwood, dwarf cornel Description: This perennial ground cover grows 2-10 inches tall and, when in flower, looks like a miniature dogwood with its whorl of leaves topped by a dogwood -like flower. Upright stems arise in the spring or early summer, and support a terminal whorl of 4-7 leaves. Leaves are 1-3 inches long, pointed, oval, and have parallel veins. Flowers appear May to June, with four pure -white or purple -tinged "petals" (actually modified leaves that surround the inconspicuous real flowers). Fruits are small (about '/. inch in diameter), bright orange to bright red, single- seeded berries. Habitat: Usually near the coast, in moist coniferous forests and along the edges of bogs. Where there is a lot of precipitation, it may grow on stumps and on tree trunks. Prefers acid soils that are somewhat damp for most of the year. Partial to full shade, Advantages/Disadvantages: This beautiful ground cover is particularly delightful when in bloom, and will form extensive beds. Birds eat the berries, and grouse eat the buds. Propagation: Can be salvaged (which must be done while the leaves are still on so you can find them), but seedlings grown from seeds have a greater chance of survival. Collect seeds August to October, as soon as the fruit are ripe. If sown right away, you don't need to remove the flesh. Some seeds may not germinate until the second spring. Many nurseries still use the former name. Plants sold locally are often from the East Coast and are not native to our area. Suitable Growing Environment: deep shade and moist soils (ground cover) Main Menu Classifications http://cahedb.wsu.edu/nativePlant/scripts/webDisplayText.asp?ID=nv0S9 8/11/2006 Page 1 of 1 Cornus unalaschkensis (formerly called C. canadensis var. intermedia, but see note under Propagation) (Click on picture for full size.) http://cahedb.wsu,edu/nativePlant/scripts/webDisplayThumbs.asp?ID=nvO59 8/11/2006 WSU CAHE Native Plant Amelanchiex alnifolia western serviceberry, Pacific serviceberry, saskatoon serviceberry, Saskatoon -berry, saskatoon Page 1 of 1 Description: This multi -stemmed, deciduous native usually grows 10-12 feet tall, and has smooth, dark gray to reddish bark. Leaves are alternate, thin, oval, 1-2 inches long, and mostly smooth-edged on the lower half of the leaf, becoming regularly toothed on the outer half, with veins running out to the teeth. Flowers are white with five long, thin petals, and form showy, erect or droopy clusters. Fruits are small ('/2 inch in diameter) and initially dull -red, becoming dark purple when ripe, and look somewhat like small blueberries. Difficult to identify in winter, but look for slender, curved, alternate buds and a larger terminal bud. Two of the varieties found in Western Washington are var. humptulipensis and var. semiintegr folia. Habitat: In moist to dry areas, on well -drained soils; often in open conifer forests. Full sun to partial shade. Common throughout the Northwest, frequently in thickets. Very drought - tolerant. Advantages/Disadvantages: Though largely unnoticed except when in bloom, its showy flowers and delicious fruit make it a good ornamental plant for open, wooded sites, or woodland edges. Can form soil- holding thickets via rooting branch tips. Provides good wildlife cover. Foliage and new twigs are prized by deer and elk. Fruits are eaten by many birds and mammals. In some areas, it is susceptible to a disfiguring leaf rust disease. Propagation: Can be grown from seed or salvaged seedlings. Collect fruit when ripe (in late summer) and separate seeds from pulp. Seed not sown in the fall should not be allowed to dry out, and needs to be cold -stratified for 3-6 months to break seed dormancy. Seedlings under three feet tall can be salvaged. Plants in your yard can be layered to produce new plants. Suitable Growing Environment: sun and well -drained soils (understory) Main Menu Classifications http://cahedb.wsu.edu/nativePlant/scripts/webDisplayText.asp?ID=nv005 8/11/2006 Page 1 of 1 Amelanehier alnifolia (Click on picture for full size http.Heahedb.wsu.edu/nativePlant/scripts/webDisplayThumbs.asp?ID=nv005 8/11/2006 WSU CAHE Native Plant Blechnum spicant deer fern Page 1 of 1 Description: This 1-3 foot tall fern consists of sterile fronds encircling a central clump of fertile fronds. Both types of fronds have widely -spaced, oblong leaflets that become progressively smaller as one moves from the middle of the frond toward either end. The surrounding sterile fronds are evergreen and frequently lie on the ground, while the central fertile fronds are deciduous and erect, with much narrower and often rolled -up leaflets. Habitat: In moist, coniferous forests. Full sun (in moister areas) to full shade; prefers shade, and takes dry shade well. Advantages/Disadvantages: An attractive addition to appropriate landscapes. In some areas, it is an important winter food for deer and elk. Propagation: Can be salvaged. Suitable Growing Environment: deep shade and moist soils (ground cover) Main Menu Classifications http://cahedb.wsu.edu/nativePlant/scripts/webDisplayText.asp?ID=nvO58 8/11/2006 Page 1 of 1 Blechnum spicant (Click on picture for full size.) http://cahedb.wsu.edu/nativePlant/scripts/webDisplayThumbs.asp?ID=nvO58 8/11/2006 WSU CAHE Native Plant Asarum caudatum wild -ginger Page 1 of 1 Description: This low -growing evergreen perennial can be identified by its large (2-5 inches across), shiny, heart -shaped leaves, and the lemony -ginger smell of its leaves when bruised. Each leaf is attached to a hairy, 2-8 inch -tall stalk, and the stalks are in pairs from each of the rhizome's nodes. The solitary, reddish -brown flowers are rarely seen due to concealing leaves, and produce a fleshy capsule. Habitat: Common at low to middle elevations in moist, coniferous forests, in soils with a high organic content, Partial to full shade. Advantages/Disadvantages: Its beautiful leaves and willingness to spread by extensive rhizomes makes it a popular choice for gardens. Propagation: Easily grown from seed. Can also be grown from rhizome cuttings and by transplanting rooted sections. Suitable Growing Environment: deep shade and moist soils (ground cover) Main Menu Classifications http:l/cahedb.wsu.edu/nativePlant/scripts/webDisplayText.asp?ID=nvO56 8/11/2006 Page 1 of 1 Asarum caudatum (Click on picture for full size.) http://cal-iedb.wsu.edu/nativePlant/scripts/webDisplayThumbs.asp?ID=nvO56 8/11/2006 WSU CAHE Native Plant Page 1 of 1 Athyrium filix femina var, cyclosorum lady fern Description: This large (2-5 feet tall) fern has multiple fronds growing from a central clump. Fronds are deciduous, bright yellow -green, lance -shaped, tapered at both ends, and 2-3 times pinnate (though the smallest leaflets are just coarsely serrated). Habitat: Wet meadows, forested wetlands, bogs, and nearly any damp area. In moist to wet, organic soils. Full sun to full shade. Advantages/Disadvantages: An excellent addition to wetland restoration projects due to its rapid growth and adaptability to a variety of environmental conditions. It can also be used as an ornamental plant in a wet site. Provides cover for wildlife. Propagation: Easily salvaged during the dormant season (November to March), when the dead fronds can be used to locate individual plants. Once established in a favorable environment, it spreads readily from spores. Salvaged plants or plants already in your yard can be multiplied by division. Suitable Growing Environment: deep shade and moist soils (ground cover) sun and moist soils (ground cover) Main. Menu Classifications http://cahedb.wsu,edu/nativePlant/scripts/webDisplayText.asp?ID=nv0S7 8/11/2006 Page 1 of 1 Athyriumfilix femina var. cyclosorum (Click on picture for full size.) http://cabedb.wsu.edu/nativePlanVscripts/webDisplayThumbs.asp?ID=n,vO57 8/11/2006 WSU CAHE Native Plant Linnaea borealis ssp. longiflora twinflower Page 1 of 1 Description: This trailing ground cover is easily recognized by its small, shiny, evergreen leaves and dainty pairs of nodding flowers. Plants are usually under two inches tall, spread by long runners, and can form large mats. Leaves are opposite, oval, less than one inch long, and bright to dark green in color. Flowers appear May to June in pairs at the end of a thin Y-shaped stalk, and are small (under 1/2 inch long), fragrant, white to pink, and cone- shaped. Habitat: Grows in partial shade, in a variety of forested settings and soils from dry to moist. Advantages/Disadvantages: Its glossy evergreen leaves, beautiful fragrant flowers, and rapid but non-aggressive spreading habit, make this a glorious choice for partially shaded settings. Propagation: Easy to propagate from young, rooted sections of runner, carefully detached from parent plants. Can also be grown from hardwood cuttings. Suitable Growing Environment: deep shade and moist soils (ground cover) partial shade and well -drained soils (ground cover) sun and well -drained soils (ground cover) Main Menu Classifications http://cahedb,wsu. edu/nativePlant/scripts/webDisplayText.asp?ID=nvO62 8/11/2006 Page 1 of 1 Linnaea borealis ssp. longiflora (Click on picture for full size.) http://cahedb.wsu.edu/nativePlant/scripts/webDisplayThumbs.asp?ID=nvO62 8/11/2006 sly'. <1Q L �� �-�Q LO Cn U M LO CZ � Q � m i Q O O Z M M Z kn GIF . nn cd N O L p•, U o ai U Gn U r� w Lt C7 OT C-72 Vim v y '"R)� , Kathy Keaiker, Mayor September S, 2005 Daniel Bretzke 1313 33rd Avenue S Seattle, WA 98144 SUBJECT: Bretzke Lot Line Adjustment Project No. LUA06-088, LLA Dear W. Bretzke: CITI JF RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator The City of Renton has completed the initial review of your proposed lot line adjustment. Attached you will find a copy of the comments from our Property Services section, which will need to be addressed before the LLA can be approved. Once the changes have been made, please submit two full sized paper copies of the revised lot line adjustment the sixth floor counter of the Planning/Building/Public Department at Renton City Hall. The revised plans will be routed for final review and you will be notified when it is appropriate to submit the final mylars. If you have any questions regarding your application or the changes requested above, please contact me at (425) 430-7270. Sincerely, Valerie Kinast Associate Planner cc: Yellow file 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 AhThicrw+ rm takn FrMrpi�: maf—i 'i/Wti. mef mncinror RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: September 5, 2006 TO: Valerie Kinast FROM: Sonja J. Fesser SUBJECT: Bretzke-Rogers Lot Line Adjustment, LUA-06-088-LLA Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced lot line adjustment submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant: Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA-06-088-LLA and LND-30-0318, respectively, on both drawing sheets of the lot line adjustment submittal, in the spaces already provided. The "City of Renton Bench Mark No. RENT2101" does not qualify as a tie to the City of Renton Horizontal Survey Control Network. Provide a second tie. The geometry will be checked when the second tie is provided. Change the county street name (148`h Ave SE) to the city designated street name (Nile Ave NE} on the "VICINITY MAP" (Sheet 1 of 2) and on the lot line adjustment drawing (Sheet 2 of 2). There is no need to prefix the lot names with "NEW" (Sheet 2 of 2). "LOT A", etc. is sufficient. It appears that the legal description for "PARCEL C" (Sheet 1 of 2) is missing the exception for the north 30 feet thereof. Change all "BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT" references (on the lot line adjustment submittal) to LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT. Note all easements, covenants and agreements of record on the drawing, if any. Note that the properties to the east, west and south of the subject parcel are unplatted. The zoning of these properties and the tax parcel numbers are not needed- \HAFiie Sys1LMD - Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-30 - Lot Line Adjustments\0318TV060905.doc September 7, 2006 Page 2 The city will provide addresses for the lots not currently addressed, as soon as possible. Note all four addresses on the lot line adjustment drawing. On the final lot line adjustment submittal, remove all references to the wetland symbols, setback lines, proposed buildings, utilities facilities and other items not directly impacting the subdivision. Setbacks will be determined at time of issuance of building permits. Do note encroachments on the final submittal, if any. Note that if there are easements, restrictive covenants or agreements to others (City of Renton, etc.) as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the lot line adjustment. The lot line adjustment submittal and the associated document(s) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package. The lot line adjustment will be recorded first (by King County). The recording number(s) for the associated document(s) are to be referenced on the lot line adjustment drawing. Provide spaces for the recording numbers thereof. The new 25' wide/20' wide easement for ingress, egress and utilities (?) is shown for the benefit of future owners of proposed subdivisions and lots. Note on the drawing that said easement is "NEW" and "PRIVATE". Reference said easement on the lot line adjustment drawing, and provide a space for the recording number thereof. Add the following Declaration of Covenant language on the face of the subject drawing, if the previous paragraph applies: DECLARATION OF COVENANT The owners of the land embraced within this lot line adjustment, in return for the benefit to accrue from this subdivision, by signing hereon covenant and agree to convey the beneficial interest in the new easement shown on this lot line adjustment to any and all future purchasers of the lots, or of any subdivisions thereof. This covenant shall run with the land as shown on this lot line adjustment. The private ingress, egress and utility(?) easement requires a "New Private Easement for Ingress, Egress and Utilities Maintenance Agreement" statement. Note the attachment on the drawing. Comments for the Proiect Mana er: Is a Native Growth Protection Area Easement statement (for wetlands) needed? Fee Review Comments: Lots within or affected by the lot line adjustment are subject to the city's special charges, if any. HAFile Sys%LND - Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-30 - Lot Line Adjustments103 MRV060905.doc%cor Title for both of the following paragMehs, NEW PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS & UTILITIES MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Use the following paragraph if there are two or more lots participating in the agreement: NOTE: NEW PRIVATE EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES IS TO BE CREATED UPON THE SALE OF LOTS SHOWN ON THIS SHORT PLAT. THE OWNERS OF LOTS SHALL HAVE AN EQUAL AND UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE OWNERSHIP AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT APPURTENANCES. THESE APPURTENANCES AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE THE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD, DRAINAGE PIPES, AND STORM WATER QUALITY AND/OR DETENTION FACILITIES WITHIN THIS EASEMENT, PRIVATE SIGNAGE, AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE NOT OWNED BY THE CITY OF RENTON OR OTHER UTILITY PROVIDERS. MAINTENANCE COSTS SHALL BE SHARED EQUALLY. PARKING ON THE PAVING IN THE ACCESS EASEMENT IS PROHIBITED, UNLESS PAVEMENT WIDTH IS GREATER THAN 20 FEET. Use the following paragraph if there is one lot subject to the agreement: NOTE: NEW PRIVATE EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES IS TO BE CREATED UPON THE SALE OF LOTS SHOWN ON THIS SHORT PLAT. THE OWNER OF LOT SHALL HAVE OWNERSHIP AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT APPURTENANCES. THESE APPURTENANCES AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE THE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD, DRAINAGE PIPES, AND STORM WATER QUALITY AND/OR DETENTION FACILITIES WITHIN THIS EASEMENT, PRIVATE SIGNAGE, AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE NOT OWNED BY THE CITY OF RENTON OR OTHER UTILITY PROVIDERS. MAINTENANCE COSTS SHALL BE SHARED EQUALLY. PARKING ON THE PAVING IN THE ACCESS EASEMENT IS PROHIBITED, UNLESS PAVEMENT WIDTH IS GREATER THAN 20 FEET. City o...enton Department of Planning / Building / Pub_ . Vorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: JVf COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 14, 200 EIVED APPLICATION NO: LUA06-088, LLA DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 31, 2006 APPLICANT: Daniel Bretzke PROJECT MANAGER: Valerie Kinast PROJECT TITLE: Bretzke-Ra ers Lot Line Adjustment effY OF REN ON PLAN REVIEW: Arneta Henninger UTILITY SYSTEMS SITE AREA: 3.22 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 2 houses — 2,490 sq. ft & 1,900 sq. ft. LOCATION: 5521 & 5603 NE 10th Street WORK ORDER NO: 77622 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to adjust the lot lines between four lots. The net density of the four lots is approx. 1.74 units/acre. The site contains 34,160 sq, ft. of wetlands. The applicant proposes to reconfigure the lots so that the wetlands would be protected, two buildable lots would be made and two lots would be created that could be short platted in the future. The lot sizes would be: Lot A 11,431.83 sq ft, Lot B 8,676.24 sq ft, Lot C 83,130.91 sq ft, and Lot D 36,901.87 sq ft. Although all lots would have direct access from NE 10th St., the applicant would provide an access easement for the future short plats at this time. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Probable Minor Major Impacts Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Aesthetics Air Recreation Water Utilities Plants Public Services Land/Shoreline Use HistorWCultural Preservation Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Probable More Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Trans Dilation Public Services HistorWCultural Preservation Airport Environment 10, 000 Feet 14, 040 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City or ,enton Department of Planning /Building / Pub_ . _lorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: WY OF RE WON COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 14, 2006 R E C E I APPLICATION NO: LUA06-088, LLA DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 31, 2006 APPLICANT: Daniel Bretzke PROJECT MANAGER: Valerie Kinast PROJECT TITLE: Bretzke-Rogers Lot Line Adjustment PLAN REVIEW: Arneta Henninger BUILDING DIVISION SITE AREA: 3.22 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 2 houses — 2,400 sq. ft & 1,900 sq. ft. LOCATION: 5521 & 5603 NE 10t' Street WORK ORDER NO: 77622 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to adjust the lot lines between four lots. The net density of the four lots is approx. 1.74 units/acre. The site contains 34,160 sq. ft. of wetlands. The applicant proposes to reconfigure the lots so that the wetlands would be protected, two buildable lots would be made and two lots would be created that could be short platted in the future. The lot sizes would be: Lot A 11,431.83 sq ft, Lot B 8,676.24 sq ft, Lot C 83,130.91 sq ft, and Lot D 36,901.87 sq ft. Although all lots would have direct access from NE 10th St., the applicant would provide an access easement for the future short plats at this time. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Probable More Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants LandlShoreGne Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources Airport Environment 10.000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Probable More Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Hous!0 Aesthetics L' htlGlare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services HistoriclCultural Preservation Airport Environment 10.000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. �0 I I Signature of Director or Authorized Representative City of rsenton Department of Planning / Building / Pub— Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION_-REViE.W__.SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: + re. COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST , ^qqg f 1 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-088, LLA DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 31, 2006 APPLICANT: Daniel Bretzke JUL 3 120 PROJECT MANAGER: aeieKihast PROJECT TITLE, Bretzke-Rogers Lot Line Adjustment PLAN REVIEW: Arneta Hen iinge - - - - i SITE AREA: 3.22 acres BUILDING AREA ross : 2 1 ouses – 2'400 's . ft & 1,900 sq. ft. LOCATION: 5521 & 5603 NE 10'h Street WORK ORDER NO: 77622 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to adjust the lot lines between four lots. The net density of the four lots is approx. 1.74 units/acre. The site contains 34,160 sq. ft. of wetlands. The applicant proposes to reconfigure the lots so that the wetlands would be protected, two buildable lots would be made and two lots would be created that could be short platted in the future. The lot sizes would be. Lot A 11,431.83 sq ft, Lot B 8,676.24 sq ft, Lot C 83,130.91 sq ft, and Lot D 36,901.87 sq ft. Although all lots would have direct access from NE 10th St., the applicant would provide an access easement for the future short plats at this time. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Nan -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Probable Minor Major Impacts Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Aesthetics Air Recreation Water Utilities Plants Public Services Land/Shoreline Use HistoriclCultural Preservation Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Probable More Minor Major information Impacts impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services HistoriclCultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ,UA C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS q We have revie d this applicati n with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a itional informa is needed to properly assess this proposat. Q 5ignatu of irector or Authorized epresentative Date ,, .)Kathy Keolker, Mayor July 31, 2006 Daniel Bretzke 1313 33`d Avenue S Seattle, WA 98144 CITY 3F RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator Subject: Bretzke-Rogers Lot Line Adjustment LUA06-088, LLA Dear Mr. Bretzke: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. You will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please understand that by separating the lot line adjustment from the short platting process, it is not possible for the various departments to review the future short plat at this time. We recommended combining the processes. Review and approval of the lot line adjustment will in no way imply that the short plat the applicant intends to complete in the future meets codes or would be approved. Please contact me at (425) 430-7270 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Valerie Kinast Associate Planner cc: Larry Rogers / Owner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 MThis Pamreontams 50°/. recvcied material. 30%Dost oonsumer RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE t�; -t� c% DEV LOY OF RFNTTON PLAING City of Renton JUL i 2m LAND USE PERMIT orr RECEIVE yNASTER APPLICATI( PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: Daniel and Fumiko Bretzke Larry Rogers ADDRESS: 5521 NE 10"' St, 5603 NE 10th St CITY: Renton ZIP: 95059 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 206 310 2190 APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME. Daniel Bretzke COMPANY (if applicable): ADDRESS: 1313 33"1 Ave S CITY: Seattle ZIP: 98144 TELEPHONE NUMBER 206 310 2190 CONTACT PERSON NAME: Same COMPANY (if applicable): ADDRESS: CITY: ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: 206 310 2190 danieibretzke@gmaii.com PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT WRDEIV OPMENT NAME: Bretzke Lot Line adjustment PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 5521 NE Ie St, Renton WA 98059 5603 NE 10"' St Renton WA 98059 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 102305 9357, 102305 9358,1023059359,102w+ 358,1023059359,102305 EXISTING LAND USE(S): Single Family residential PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Single Family residential EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Residential Low Density PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): EXISTING ZONING: R PROPOSED ZONING (Ff applicable): na SITE AREA (in square feet): 140,140.85 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: na SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: 5775.56 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): 3.91 (after planned short plats) Q; web/pw/devsery/forms/plaming/masterapp.doc 07111106 PI __JECT INFORMA NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): na NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 2 NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 2 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): 3600 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): 2400, 1900 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): na SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): 1600 NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): TION conti ed NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: $20,00 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq, ft. o SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. ❑ WETLANDS 34160 _ sq. ft. T LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE NE QUARTER OF SECTION 10_, TOWNSHIP 23� �,,, RANGE -5 , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Lot line Adjustment 3. 2. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ CI AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP p6%n,P'k torr -1 V'05ers-- 1, (Print Name/s) P 14,%t V, o 6r e4 -21A(. , declare that I am (please check one) the current owner of the property involved in this application or the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing tements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best f m k Zalief . I certify that 1 know or hasatisfactory evidence that tfi ve �� signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be h*fterRheir free and ry otaact for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. �_ �- � Z" (Signature of Owner/Representative) CV (Signature of Owner/Representative) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) 'F. e" /" My appointment expires: /1-9 'p" g - A E. STr�r NOt, r�<<C vii O��•8 08 J�rr4�A N4N��0�'= Q:web/pw/dersery/forms/piamiing/masterapp.doc 2 07/11/06 Bretzke Rogers Lot Line Adjustment SgbptA:ANNING CITY OF RENTON Transmitted on 7112/06 JUL 12 2006 By Daniel Bretzke RECEIVE[ 1 • ' Land Use Permit Master Application Form: Please provide the original plus 4 copies of the COMPLETED City of Renton Development Services Division's Master Application form. The application form must have notarized signatures of ALL current property owners for each parcel involved in the lot line adjustment. The legal descriptions of the properties must be attached to the application form. 2. Draft Legal Documents: ( ) 1-, 5 Y ` ❑ Waiver Form: If you have received a waiver form during or after a "pre -application meeting", please provide 5 copies of this form. 4. ❑ Fees: 5. Project Narrative: Please provide 5 copies of a clear and concise description of the proposed project, including the following: • Project name (e.g. Smith/Larsen Lot Line Adjustment) • Location and addresses of sites • Purpose of the lot line adjustment • Current use of the sites and any existing improvements • Special site features (i.e. wetlands, water bodies, steep slopes) • Proposed future use of the properties, if any • Any proposed code modification being requested 6,/t Density Worksheet: Please submit 5 copies of a completed density worksheet. (See attached for both lot line adjustment and future short plats) Neighborhood Detail Map: Please provide 12 copies of a map drawn at a scale of 1 " 100' or 1" = 200' (or other scale approved by the Development Services Division) to be used to identify the site location on public notices and to review compatibility with surrounding land uses. The map shall identify the subject site with a much darker perimeter line than surrounding properties and include at least two cross streets in all directions showing the location of the subject site relative to property boundaries of surrounding parcels. The map shall also show: the property's lot lines, lot lines of surrounding properties, boundaries of the City of Renton (if applicable), north arrow (oriented to the top of the plan sheet), graphic scale used for the map, and City of Renton (not King County) street names for all streets shown. Please ensure all information fits on a single map sheet. I k 8• Lot Line Adjustment Plan: Please provide 5 copies of a fully -dimensioned plan prepared by a State of Washington registered land surveyor, drawn at a scale of 1" = 40' on an 18" x 24" plan sheet (or other size or scale approved by the Development Services- 9.,0' ervices: 9.,0' Wetland Assessment: Please provide 5 copies of the map and 3 copies of the report if ANY wetlands are located on the subject property or within 100 feet of the subject property. The wetland report/delineation must include the information specified in RMC 4-8-120D. In addition, if any alteration to the wetland or buffer is proposed, 5 copies of a wetland mitigation plan are also required. See RMC 4-8-120D for plan content requirements ( See Attached from Berger Abam) r o ,rt 10. Standard Stream or le Study: Please provide 5 copies of a report containing the information • specified in RMC Section 4-8-1200. In addition, if the project involves an unclassified stream, a supplemental stream or lake study is also required (5 copies). If any alteration to a water - body or buffer is proposed a supplemental stream or lake study (5 copies) and a mitigation plan (5 copies) are also required. See RMC 4-5-120D for pian content requirements. ( See attached from Wedge Wood Development) 11 Topography Map: Please provide 5 copies of a plan showing the site's existing contour lines at five-foot vertical intervals. 12- ❑ Utilities Plan, Generalized (sewer, water, stormwater, transportation improvements): Please provide 5 copies of a plan drawn on 22" x 34" plan sheets using a graphic scale of 1 " = 40' (or other size or scale approved by the Development Services Division) clearly showing all existing and proposed public or private improvements. (To Be submitted with short plat application) 13. ❑ Drainage Control Plan: Please provide 5 copies of a plan drawn to scale and stamped by a Washington State licensed professional engineer and complying with the requirements of Renton Municipal Code, Section 4-6-030 and the King County Surface Water Management Design Manual, 1990 edition, as adopted by the City of Renton. (To be submitted with Short Plat Application) 15- 11 Gr"""Calculations. Please provide 3 copies of complete field calculations and computations noted for the plat and details (if any) of all distances, angles, and calculations together with information on the error of closure. The error of closure on any traverse shall not exceed 1' in 10,000'. Daniel Bretzke, AICP 1313 334 Ave South Seattle, WA 98144 July l 1, 2006 Valerie Kinast City of Renton, Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Project Narrative Project Name: Bretzke - Rogers Boundary Line Adjustment Address: 5521 NE 10`h St, Formerly 14619 SE 116'' St 5603 NE 10`h Street, Parcel numbers 1023059358, 9359, 9360, 9357 Dear Ms. Kinast DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON JUL 12 2006 RECEIVED The purpose of this lot line adjustment is to adjust the existing lots lines to allow for future short plats of both Bretzke and Rogers property. The lot line adjustment process is also being done to allow the sale of two existing lots. In response to my pre- application meeting, L met with my neighbor Larry Rogers, who also had a pre application meeting with the city of Renton. As a result of this meeting we agreed to create a shared access and joint development of our separate property. An easement is being recorded with the lot line adjustment to allow for future development of the lots. The property contains a wetland, and associated buffers. A wetland delineation and report is being submitted with this application. This lot line adjustment is requesting that buffer averaging be approved on lot A of this Lot line adjustment, according to the wetland buffer averaging analysis report prepared by Berger Abam Consulting Engineers, as attached in attachment B. The future short plat of the lot C, will require a 70 feet wide lot adjacent to the private access tract. A request to allow 70 instead of an 80 feet wide lot is made with this application. Building setbacks will not be need to be modified, and there is adjoining lot is 100 feet, thus the intent of the code requiring an 80 feet wide lots adjacent to the private access tract is met. As explained in the pre -application meeting, engineering for street improvements or drainage would not be required at the time of the lot line adjustment, but will be required at the time of the short plat submittal. Sincerely Daniel Bretzke DENSITY :w -�kis WORKSHEET 0'� City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 1. Gross area of property: i � ! 1. l Y6r�0. OF square feet 2. Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. These include: Public streets" Private access easements*"' Critical Areas* Total excluded area: 3. Subtract line 2 from line l for net area 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage: 5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned: 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: square feet 5 7�S-,S6square feet 3Q� square feet 2. 3 13 S. q square feet 3. /00 square feet 4. 2.3 D acres 5. 4 units/lots 6. /• 7�f = dwelling units/acre *Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways." Critical areas buffers are not deducted/excluded. ** Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded. Q:lWEB1PWIDEVSERV\Forms\Ptanningldcnsity.doc Last updated. 11/08/2004 1 °EV,aF RPLANNING �rfODENSITY JUL 1 ZZ0M RECEIVED WORKSHEET City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax. 425-430-7231 „ ,After Lot Line Adjustment) 1. Grass area of property: 1. 36,901.87 feet 2. Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. These include: Public streets** Private access easements"' Critical Areas* Total excluded area: 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1 for net area feet 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage 5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned: 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: unitslacre _0 square feet _4081.2 square feet D square feet square 2. 4081.2 square feet 3. 32,820.67 square 4. .75 acres 5. 3 u n itsllots 6. 3.98 = dwelling *Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways." Critical areas buffers are not deducted/excluded. ** Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded. DENSITY WORKSHEET City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425430-7200 Fax_ 425-430-7231 , tot Lfile Adjustment) . s area 1. 83,130.91 square of property: feet 2. Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. These include: Public streets* 0 square feet Private access easements*" 1,694.36, square feet 3.1,12.1 _square feet Critical Areas* Total excluded area: feet 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1 for net area: feet 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage: 5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned: 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: nacre 2. 32,815.36. square 3. 50,315.55. square 4. 1.155086. acres 5 4 unitsllots 6. 3.46_ = dwelling *Critical Areas are defined as ,Areas determined b Critical ity to Areas be not suitable for development and which are subject to the dY' including very high landslide areas, probMted slopes, wetlands or floodways." Critical areas buffers are not deducted/excluded. ** Alleys (public or privata) do not have to be excluded. W-NNAG DENSITY JUL 1 22006 W RECEIVED ORKSHEET City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 Bretike and Rogers Lot line adjustment 1. Gross area of property: 1. 140,140.85, feet 2. Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. These include: Public streets** Private access easements" Critical Areas* Total excluded area: 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1 for net area: 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage 5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned: (Including future short plats) square 0 square feet 75 57.56 square feet 34,160 square feet 2. 39,935.56 square feet 3. _100,205.29 square feet 4. 2.30 acres 5. 9 units/lots 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: 6. 3.91 = dwelling units/acre "Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the Ciity's Critical Areas Regulations including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways." Criticai areas buffers are not deducted/excluded. ' Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTt]N A1derNW JUL 12 ince August 29, 2005 RECEIVED Project No. 40401 Mr. Patrick Gilroy I andtrust, Inc. 1560 -. 140th Avenue NE Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98006 Subject: Stream Study Wedgewood Lane Division 3 itentM Washington Dear Mr. Gilroy: As requested, we have prepared a strewn study for the Wedgewood Lane Division residmUW developm�ea to be constructed in the City of Renton. We also prepared a Wetland Study for Wedgewood Lane Divisions 1, 2, and 3, dated August 15, 2005. That report describes existing conditions on each of the three proposed divisions with respect to site wetlands. This rgxx t addresses the seasonal stream draming across the north end of Wedgewood Lane Division 3 as well as Honey Creek which drains from north to south through the kW wetland along the east side of Wedgewood Lane Division 3. The project involves work for construction of a residential subdivision including three separate divisions as identified on project maps by Core Design, Inc. Work for the three divisions will be completed sequentially. This letter is intended to accompany the Wetland Report dated August 15, 2005. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS At preserrt the Wedgewood Lane property is largely undeveloped inept for an existing single family residence and several outbuildings an the northwest corner of the site. The area adjacent to the residence includes lawn and landscaping as well as area which has been in use as horse pasture. Topographically, the property Shy slgres gently dawn f -cm the west lime of Division 3 toward the wetland along the east side. Soils across the property and on much of the surrounding area are mapped as Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (Soil Survey of King County, Washington, U.S. Soil Conservation Service, 1973). `Ile Alderwood series is made up of moderately well -drained soils that have a weakly to strongly consolidated substratum at depths of between 24 and 40 inches. STREAMS 518 North 59th Street, Seattle, Washington 98103• Phone {206}783-1036 email aldernw comcast.net Mr. Patrick Gilroy August 29, 2005 Streams are defined m the Renton Municipal Code (RMC 4-11-190) as follows: "STREAM, CREEK, RIVER, OR WATERCOURSE. Any portion of a channel, bed, bank, or bottom watmvard of the ordinary high water mark in which fish may spawn, rMide, or through which they may pass, and tributary waters with defined beds or bank which influence the gwlity of fish habitat downsti pm. This includes watercourses which flow on an imermittent basis or which fluctuate in level during the year, and applies to the entire bed of such waterco use whether or not the water is at peak level. This defin0 n does not include irrigatm of ditches, canals, stormwater runoff devices, or other entirely artificial wawr+eourwS, except where they exist in a natural watercourse which has been altered by humans or except where there are salmonids". There are two seasonal streams within Wedgewood lane Divisor 3. These include the seasonal stream originating along HNwam Avenue to the west and draining eastward where it crosses the north end of the project and ingot the large wetland along the east side of the projectr. The upper reaches of Haney Creek dram from south to north through the large wetand. Hona Crea This property is within the May Creek drainage sub4min of the Cedar River Basin. Drainage from the property flows eastward to Honey Creek which flows fi-om south to north through the wetLwd on the property to the east. Honey Creek is tributary to May Creek, approximately 2 miles northwest of the property. The lower reaches of Honey Creek are identified as an unclassified stream on the King County maps. The City of Rehrton Water Class Map identifies the lower reaches of Hone Creek draining to May Creels as a Class 2 Water. Higher sections extending south and east to Union Avenue are kkndfhed as Class 3 water. The stream section cdendiag southward across Sunset Avenue and continuing south to SE 116th St. along the north side of the project area is identified as a Class 4 water. The steam is not shown on the Water Class Map as extending south of SE 116th St. Honey Creek has its head waters within the wetland area to the south of Wedgewood Lane Division 3. It drains north through the wetland and to a 24" diameter culvert in SE 116th Street. Water moves through the wetland within a .defined channel for most of the length across the site. There are short sections where the gradient is more flat, where the channel is broad and poorly defined. At the time of site observations in August, 2005, there was no flow within the stream channel through the wetland and there was no flow through the culvert in SE 116th Street. The stream stretch imniediately downstream of Wedgewood lane Division 3 has been identified on the City of Renton Water Class Map as a Class 4 Water. This classification would also apply to the upstream stretch of the stream. The standard buffer assigned for Class 4 water is 35ft. No topographic survey has been coimpleted within the wetland area to kkwtify the location of the drainage channel within the wetland. The 35 foot buffer for the stream is contained within the fifty foot buffer for the wetland. Project No. 40401 Page No. 2 'Mr. Paitick Gilroy August 29, 2005 Storm Water Treatyment Faciliti Storm water run-off from the developed area will be treated in two separate storm water treatnment facilities to be constructed on the east side of the project within proposed Division 3. Construction of the storm water treatinent ponds will be completed as an initial construction phase. Construction of the pond berms will involve temporary disturbance to the outer limits of the wetland buffer. The Went of the work for bion of the Storm -water treatinent ponds is illustratod on drawings prepared by CORE Design and on the Site Developmait Plan Figure 3. Much of the buffer area af%cted by the pond construction is currently Occupied by Hm alayan blackberry with scattered larger trees. A planting plan will be prepared to replant the affected buffer areas with native trees and shrubs. This planting plan will be designed to accelerate the establishment of native shrub habitat on the areas. SankniT Sewer Constriction Sanitary sewer service for the projact will be provided by installation of a lift station along SE. 116th Strad at the north end of the project. Ibis pump station will direct flows to existing sanitary sewer mine$. Constructor n of the Pipe line to comxzt with the pump station will require crossing a portion of dw wetland and buffer immediately north of the storm water trot per}„ The wdlaud and buffer at this location has been subject to disturbance in the past and vegetation over the area is dominated by 1fmalayme blackberry. Construction of the sanitary sewer line will also cross the large off-site wetland and Honey Creek. Tbis crossing is required to provide service for a pry residential development on the east side of the wetland. Construction of the pipe line crossing will result in temporary disturbance to the wetland and the seasonal stream channel. As a condition of approval for consuuction of the sanitary sewer line, the affected areas of the wetland, stream and wedand buffer will be required to be restored. The intent of the restoration plan will be to accelerate the reestablishment of native vegetation on the affected areas of buffer and wetland. A final restoratma plan will include the following elements: 1. Construction Timing. Work to be completed within the stream and wetland should be completed during the time period mid July through August when flows within the stream will be at a numm m. Work should be comple-ted by September to allow surface soils to stabilize before autumn rainy season resumes and the strain flows increase. Before beginning any work in or adjacent to the stream, eanstru tM techniques should be determined and reviewed to assure that the work can be completed quickly and with minimal disturbance. 2. Best Mwwgement PracticesThe project should be carried out using best management practices including the installation and mamtenance of erosion control measures. These ineasures can include installation of slit fences on either side of the creek to reduce movement of soil and material from the exposed soils of the back filled trenches: use of diversion dam and or pipe to carry surface flows across the disturbed creels bed during construction and until the creek bed is stabilized; construction techniques to limit the movement and Project No. 40401 Page No. 4 Mr. Patrick Gilroy August 29, 2005 . i , Sexsonal Stream Corridor There is a seasonal stream which flows fi-om the wetland area off the northwest corner of the Wedgewood Lane Project eastward and into the larger wetland along the east property_ Ione, It mteers. the .project area. m. Proposed - -Division 3 near the northeast corner of Proposed Division 1. It flows approximately 450 feet from the project boundary across Divisions 3 within a poorly defined channel before entering an extension of tate large off-site wedand. Himalayan blackberry (Rebus discolor) is the predominant vegetation growing over the channel. The intermittent stream crossing Division 3 of the Wedgewood Lane drains toward the larger off-site wetland which includes Honey Creek. As such it meets the criteria for inclusion as a stream. It meets the criteria for designation as a City of Renton Class 4 water, because it is intermittent and does not include salmonid .habitat. The standard buffer assigned for Class 4 water is 35ft. The drainage coures is generally about two feet is width as it flows across the property. ITrnralayan blackberry (Rubus discolor) is present as dem cover for most of the length. A fiill tree survey has not been completed for the area. 'There are few scattered large trees along the stream corridor which would provide shading to the stream. Veaetative Cover Vegetation across the property is Shy characterized as Lowland mixed forest. This cover type designation is based on the habitat categories listed in the King County Wildlife Study Guidelines for SEFA (1993). Similar categories are listed and described in the King County Wildlife HabitatProflle (1987). The majority of the property is occupied by second growth mixed forest with variation in the relative cover, by conifers and deciduous trees. Predonunant trees are Douglas fir (Pseudatsuga mendesif), western red cedar (Thuja plicata), big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), red alder (Alnus rubra), and black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera). Under story species present include V -me maple (Acer circirnatum), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), and Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor). Much of the property had been accessible for horse pasture. With the removal of horses, Himalayan blackberry has become established as a predominant shrub species over much of the area. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT —!STREAM IMPACTS It is proposed to develop the Wedgewood Lane Division 3 property for construction of a residential development as shown on project maps by Core Design, Inc. The project is being divided into three separate divisions with construction for each division scheduled separately Sanitary sewer pipe lines and a lift station to be located along SE 116th Street will be constructed in Division 3 to provide service for each of the three divisions. Storm waiter trot for each of die three divisions is also being provided in Division 3. Project No. 40401 Page No. 3 Mr. 1�,t6c k Gilroy August 29, 2045 operation of equipment within the wedand/stream bed; stabilization of disturbed surface soils using straw or other soil stabilization measures irrurmediateiy after work is completed. 3. Creek Restoration. The creek bed should be restored with the pert of gravels and cobbles. Diversion pipes should W maintained as neeessaiy until gravels are in place and the creek bed is Stabilized. 4. .Soil Restoration. Surface soils fs+oin the trench should be preserved during excavationand used as the final lift in back filling rile €ranch line. These soils will min seed and other plant materials which will regrow and provide partial restoratiom If there is movement of heavy equipn•ien over the sarfilce soils resulting c�oitipactian, the surface soils should be tilled. in S. Vegetation restomtion A vegetation restore plug plan will be prepared when final plans are finalized for the project. This planting plan will include details on the number, spacing and Vw= to be placed on the disturbed soils within the water line ease x= area. All plain tiWttrials tD be included in the planting plan will be native to the area, and to the extent possible species selected will be those native spce= pr=Wt on the property. Native trees and shrubs will be included. These plantings are intended to supplement natural regi Mation and to accelerate the establishment of native shrub cover on the disturbed area. Over time as the planta tri grow and mature there will be, trees included on the area With the impler to ntation of a restoration plan, ft impacts to the bufr and wetlarmdlsft=m can be minimired to the Went possible and the disturbed areas returned to a stable condition, with native vegetat" cover. A final restoration plan will be prepared and submitted for review as final developnxzA plans are prepared. Road C nstrnct on Caistruction of the access mad froin SE 116th Street iota Division 3 will require a crossing of the seasonal stream. Under provisions of Renton Municipal Code 4-3-050.L8a "constructive of vehicular or nonvehicular transportation crossings may be permitted m accordance with an approved supplemental streamAake, study subject to the following criteria: a) The proposed route is determined to have time least impact on the ity Cwnprehensive Plan TransportW0II Elementsiii RMC 4.64M; ant while meting C b) The crossing minir m the interruption of downstream moveriment: of wood and gravel, and C) Transportation facilities in buffer areas shall not run parallel to the water body, and d) Crossings occur as near to perpendicular with the water body as possible; and e) Crossings are designed according to the Washington Departinent of Fish and Wildlife Kish Passage Design at Road Culverts, 1999, and the National Marine Fisheries Service Gut& Ines for Salmonid Passage at Stream Crossings, 2040, or as may be updated, or equivaleid manuals as deterna d by the Responsible Official; and Project No. 40401 Page No. 5 Mr. Patrick Gilroy August 29, 2005 f) Seasonal work windows are determined and made a condition of approval; and Mitigation for the, stream crossing is being provided by enhancing the vegetative cover along the stream. Stream Mfigation --- - - t Approximately 4O hnear*dof the-pu sdisonal stream, and mnawly 2,000sq.ftof the stream. will beimpacted by construction of the road way. The stream channel and buffer at this location is occupied by dense ffimalayan blackberry growth. As a seasonal stream there is no fish habitat which will be affected by construction of the road Crossing. NftftgaUm to compensate for the Impact to the seasonal sUam for construction of the access road to Division 3 Will be provided by enhancing the vqWtative cover along the stream cover, Appromately. ISO linear fed of the stream channel and more than 8,000sq.f t of the stream buffer is included in the mitigation area. Mitigation work will involve removal and control of the Himalayan bladdwry covering the AMM corridor and replanting with native trees and shrubs. This work will be carried out in conjunction with the work in the adjacent wetlands. The Wetland report dated August 15, 2005 provides additional detail regarding the imph- x-atirn of the buffer and stream enhancemeuL The final nut[g=cn plan for the project will include: a detailed grading plan, teniparary erosion control measures to protect adjacent areas during construction, a detailed pig plan showing locations, numbers and size of species to be installed, and a maintenance and nionitoring plan to be carried out over the three, year period following construction. That plan will include the mitigation design for the stream impacts. We trust the infbnnatton presented is sufficient for your current needs. Also refer to the Wetland report dated August 15, 2005 for additional details and discussion of the stream and wetland mitigation. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call. Sincerely yours, Al erNW P. Munger "UN Project Scientist Encl.: Figure I site map Project No. 40401 Pap No. 6 SERGERIABAM ENGINEERS INC. 33301 Ninth Avenue Sauth • Suite 300 Federal Way, Washington 980413-2600 2061131.2300 • FAX 2061431.2260 DEVELOPMENT N 1NG EMG JUL 12 2000 5 May 2006 Mr. Daniel Bretzke 1313 33rd Avenue South Seattle, WA 98144 RECEIVED BERGER/ARAM E N G I N E E R S I N C. Subject: Wetland Report and Buffer Averaging Analysis Dear Mr. Bretzke: PLANNING ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM MANAGEMENT BERGER/ABAM Engineers Inc. is pleased to submit our wetland report and buffer averaging analysis to you for the property located at 5521 SE 0th Street, Renton, Washington (King County Tax Parcel Nos, 1023059358,1023059359 and 1023059360). This report and analysis is provided in the attachments as follows. Attachment A: Wetland Report complete with figures and data sheets Attachment B: Buffer Averaging Analysis complete with figures These deliverables complete our contractual requirements with you for this project. We thank you for the opportunity to assist you with this project and look forward to working with you in the future. Sin erely, jeffre B. Thomas Senior Environmental Planner JBT:dls Attachments Attachment A Wetland Report 17 February 2006 Table of Contents Section Page I. Introduction.......................................................................................................................................1 H. Background information.................................................................................................................1 A. Location....................................................................................................................................1 B. Geomorphic Context..............................................................................................................2 C. Climate and Growing Season...............................................................................................5 D. Land -Use History ...................................................................................................................6 III. Methodologies...................................................................................................................................6 A. Rationale for the Determination of the Subject Site Wetland Boundaries ......................6 B. Office Methods........................................................................................................................8 C. Field Delineation.....................................................................................................................8 IV. Results..............................................................................................................................................11 A. Data Points............................................................................................................................1Z B. Boundary Flags.................................................................................................................17 V. References........................................................................................................................................18 ImageNo. 1: Subject Site..........................................................................................................................2 Image No. 2: Sampling for Hydric Soils...............................................................................................10 Figure1- Vicinity/Site Map.....................................................................................................................3 Figure2 - Basin/Soils Map........................................................................................................................4 Figure3 - Site Aerial/Topo Map..............................................................................................................7 Figure4 - Data Point Locations..............................................................................................................13 Table No. 1: USFWS Plant Indicator Status Categories as modified by the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest - Region IX .............................11 Appendix I - Field Study Data Sheets..................................................................................................19 Wetland Report BERGEWABAM, A06112 17 February 2006 Page i of i I. Introduction BERGER/ABAM Engineers Inc. has been retainedby Sp�t.RBton, Washington (lig and delineation on the property known as 5521 SE 10 The site is located County Tax Parcel Nos. 1023059358,1023059359, and 1023059360}. within S10, T23N, R5E and the City of Renton incorporated limits (approximate Latitude 47.29 N and Longitude -122.08 W). This report provides background information, methodologies and the results of the field work. The field work was completed during a two-day period from 6 February 2006 to 7 February 2006 pursuant to Renton Municipal Code (RMC) (4)(3)(050)(M)(4a) using the procedures provided in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual, as developed by the Washington State Department of Ecology, March 1997, Ecology Publication 96-94. This report has been prepared by BERGER/ABAM Engineers �� for exclusive ri No other se by Mr- Bretzke as required documentation for land persons may use the information contained in this report for commercial purposes without express written consent of both BERGER/ABAM Engineers Inc. and Daniel Bretzke. I{, Background Information A. Location The site consists of three adjacent tax Parcels� Ague SE as depicted y Figure 1 10th Street, approximately 300 feet west - Vicinity/Site Map. There is one large wetland n�The limits of this wetlanon the sOuth-west comer d the site that follows Honey Creek drainage sub -basin. delineation are the boundaries of the site. Image No.1 is a photo of the site taken from a vantage point above the landscape. BERGER/ABAM A06112 Wettand Report Page 1 of 1 Image No. 1: Subject Site B. Geomorphic Context The site is part of the May Creek drainage basin and the Cedar River/Lake Washington watershed as mapped in WRIA No. 8 and shown in Figure 2. The geomorphology of this area consists of outwash till plains, terraces, and glacial till plains (Gale, Pringle, and Snyder; 1973). The immediate area is characterized by rolling hills and supports a complex of wetlands and uplands that has undergone significant landscape alterations including clearing and filling activities. There are three soils located on or near this site as shown in Figure 2 by the Soil Survey of King County Area (Gale, Pringle, and Snyder; 1973). The mapping symbols and slope classes of the three alderwood subgroups are as follows. AgB. 0 to 6% Slopes AgC: 6 to 15% Slopes AgD: 15 to 30% Slopes Wetland Report 17 February 2006 BERGEWABAM, A06112 Page 2 of 2 r-, A ■ l4 I 55 AL At i T`. � jy�' "F �"r. • � -'•`" Y�y^. Y �. F- PFk � � n F- t } } [- Vii• 4 ILI its e J. pct,• 4' •:. r ti= SubjectLegend Source: King County GIS 2002 USGS High Resolution Orthoirnage Property•" i The King Conservation District describes Alderwood soils as follows "Moderately well -drained soils underlain by consolidated glacial till (hardpan) at a depth of 24 to 40 inches. Alderwood soils formed in glacial deposits under conifers. They occupy upland areas at elevations between 100 and 800 feet. The annual precipitation is 35 to 60 inches, mostly rainfall between October and May. The frost - free season is 150 to 200 days." (King Conservation District) A typical Alderwood soil profile from 0 to 27 inches is a dark brown gravelly sandy loam. From 27 to 60 inches, the soil takes a grayish brown weakly to strongly consolidated glacial till characteristic (hardpan). Soil permeability is rapid in surface layer and subsoil above hardpan material and very slow in the hardpan. The depth to the seasonal high water table is 2 to 3 feet and the water -holding capacity is seasonally low (summer) to seasonally high (winter) (King Conservation District). Observations made on the landscape scale and during soil sampling were generally consistent with the descriptions provided in the Soil Survey of King County Area and by the King Conservation District. C. Climate and Growing Season 1. Climate Climatic information provided by the Soil Survey of King County Area on pages 58-89 and in Table 10 illustrates that the climate influencing the site is greatly tempered by weather systems that originate on the Pacific Ocean (Gale, Pringle, and Snyder;1973). Fairly warm, dry summers and cool, moist winters are the prevailing conditions. A pronounced dry season occurs during the late spring and summer months, with less than 10 days of cloudy or overcast weather and very little precipitation falling in July and August. Rains are frequent during the rest of the year, especially in late fall and winter. Average precipitation is 37 inches per year in Seattle measured at the Seattle -Tacoma International Airport. Snow is rare and typically melts quickly when it does occur. Marine air masses regulate the area's moderate temperatures. Average winter temperatures in the area average around 35° to 45°F, and summer temperatures typically average 60° to 70°F (Gale, Pringle, and Snyder; 1973). The combination of cool moist periods punctuated by distinct summer droughts is one of the chief determinants of the hydrology of the site (Gale, Pringle, and Snyder; 1973). 2. Growing Season The USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service currently defines the growing season as the portion of the year when soil temperatures at 19.7 inches below the soil surface are higher than biological zero (approximately 41° F) (USDA, NRCS,1996). Using information provided by the Soil Survey of King County Area (Table 10) for Seattle -Tacoma International Airport and consistent with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers guidance, the growing season can be approximated for five years in ten (50 percent of the time) using the 28° F Wetland Report 17 February 2006 BERGER/ABAM, A06112 Page 5 of 5 standard (Gale, Pringle, and Snyder; 1973). Using these criteria, the growing season for the site occurs between 9 March and 17 November and is 253 days in length. D. Land -Use History Historically, the primary uses of this landscape have been timber production, berry production, row crops, pasture, and urban development. Low fertility and summer drought have been limiting factors to extensive farming of this area. Douglas -fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, red alder, and bigleaf maple are important tree species on all slope classes. Black cottonwood can also be found in this area (Gale, Pringle, and Snyder, 1973). Recently, pressures of urban development have begun to re -alter the areas landscape and previously platted lots are being divided into a greater number of smaller lots. This redistribution of land rights and ownership has led to additional removal of forested hill tops and has increased stormwater runoff and erosion and has impacted the adjacent wetland systems. The subject site, as illustrated in Figure 3, consists of one home towards the top of the hill, and a large fenced horse area that appears to have been graded to provide a flat area for the purpose of pasture. Due to this ongoing land use, significant site erosion is apparent and this is impacting the adjacent subject wetland through sheet flow. III. Methodologies A. Rationale for the Determination of the Subject Site Wetland Boundaries The field work was completed during a two-day period from 6 February 2006 to 7 February 2006 pursuant to Renton Municipal Code (RMC) (4)(3)(050)(M)(4a) using the procedures provided in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual, as developed by the Washington State Department of Ecology, March 1997, Ecology Publication 96-94. Although the data collection and field study associated with this delineation were not made during the growing season and hydrologic observations were made following one of the areas wettest months on record, all work was done in accordance with WAC 173-22-080 that states. "It is the purpose of a delineation manual to provide information and methods that will allow a delineator to make an accurate wetland delineation at any time of the year." For this reason, field study and data collection was completed as required by the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual, however, experience and field judgment were also considered in delineating the wetland boundary on the site. Wetland Report BERGER/ABAK A06112 17 February 2006 Page 6 of 6 B. Office Methods Consistent with the scope of this project and procedures detailed in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual, preliminary information about the site and the immediate vicinity prior to completing the field work. General information sources included the Soil Survey of King County Area, National Wetlands Inventory Maps, both King County and City of Renton websites, and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data, as well as public records available at the City of Renton. In addition, aerial photographs taken in 2002 and topographic data were reviewed and are depicted in Figure 3. Based on this information, it was possible to make preliminary decisions about the wetland system based on guidance from the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual, Part IV, Section B that helped to scope the completed field work, including the fact that the wetland has been previously identified and accepted as a Type H wetland by the City of Renton for adjacent development activities. C. Field Delineation The Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual governs that an area is not considered a regulated wetland if indicators/evidence of any one of three defined parameters, including hydrology, soil, and vegetation are not observed under normal environmental conditions to make a positive wetland determination. Methods of evaluation for each of these parameters are as follows. 3. Hydrology Evaluation Consistent with the Washington State Wetlands and Delineation Manual, the presence of wetland hydrology can be determined by evaluating a variety of direct and indirect indicators. In addition to hydrologic data/records Wedand Report 17 February 2006 pertaining directly to the study area, hydrologic indicators are used to infer wetland hydrology. Field indicators of wetland hydrology listed in the Washington State Wetlands and Delineation Manual include, but are not limited to, visual observation of inundation and/or soil saturation, oxidized channels (rhizospheres) associated with living roots and rhizomes, water marks on vegetation or fixed objects, drift lines, water -born sediment deposits, water -stained leaves, surface scoured areas, wetland drainage patterns, morphological plant adaptations, and hydric soil characteristics. According to the Washington State Wetlands and Delineation Manual, areas that are inundated and/or saturated to the surface for a consecutive number of days between 5 and 12.5 percent of the growing season may or may not be wetlands. As outlined under "Climate and Growing Season for Wetland Delineations" above, the growing season defined by the Soil Survey of King County Area for Seattle -Tacoma International Airport, is 253 days in length. Assuming the lower percentage, 5 percent of 253 days is 13 consecutive days. Therefore, consistent with the Washington State Wetlands and Delineation BERGERfABAK A06112 Page 8 of 8 Manual, an area must be inundated or saturated to the surface for 13 consecutive days during the growing season, which extends from 9 March to 17 November. 2. Soil Evaluation Wetland Report 17 February 2006 The presence of hydric soils can be determined based on the criteria outlined in the Washington State Wetlands and Delineation Manual. The definition of a hydric soil is "... a soil that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part" (USDA, MRCS, 1996). The definition of a hydric soil is satisfied by the fulfillment of at least one of four technical criteria, including the followingAs AAs: (1) All Histels except Folistels and Histosols except Folists; or (2) Soils in Aquic suborders, great groups, or subgroups, Albolls suborder, Historthels great group, Histoturbels great group, Pachic subgroups, or Cumulic subgroups that are: (a) Somewhat poorly drained with a water table equal to 0.0 foot from the surface during the growing season, or (b) Poorly drained or very poorly drained and have either: Water table equal to 0.0 foot during the growing season if textures are coarse sand, sand, or fine sand in all layers within 20 inches; or for other soils (ii) Water table at less than or equal to 0.5 foot from the surface during the growing season if permeability is equal to or greater than 6.0 inches/hour in all layers within 20 inches; or (iii) A water table at less than or equal to 1.0 foot from the surface during the growing season if permeability is less than 6.0 inches/hour in any layer within 20 inches; or (3) Soils that are frequently ponded for long or very long durations during the growing season; or (4) Soils that are frequently flooded for long or very long durations during the growing season. Fulfillment of the technical criteria for soil can be inferred by using a combination of published soils information and field indicators. The indicators available for determining whether a soil satisfies the basic definition and the technical criteria for hydric soils include, but are not limited to the fallowing: the soil is a histosol, a histic epipedon is present, hydrogen sulfide odor is present, the soil is gleyed, the soil has a depleted matrix, the soil has a low chroma matrix with redoximorphic features (e.g., mottles), iron and/or manganese concretions are present, the soil occurs in an aquic or peraquic soil moisture regime, and the soil appears on the hydric soils list. SERGERIABAK A06112 Page 9 of 9 Image No. 2: Sampling for Hydric Soils 3. Vegetation Evaluation For an accurate wetland determination to be made, the presence of hydrophytic vegetation must also be identified consistent with the Washington State Wetlands and Delineation Manual. Species identifications and taxonomic nomenclature follow that were found in A Field Guide to the Common Wetland Plants of Western Washington and North-Western Oregon (Cooke 1997). Dominant species in each of the three strata (tree, sapling/shrub, and herb) were identified. Dominant species are those species in each stratum that, when ranked in descending order of abundance and cumulatively totaled, immediately exceed SO percent cover of the total dominance measure for that stratum, plus any species that comprises at least 20 percent cover. Each species' indicator states was assigned using the National List of Plant Species that Occur in. Wetlands: Northwest - Region IX (Reed 1988). A species indicator status refers to the relative frequency with which the species occurs in jurisdictional wetlands as outlined in Table No 1. Wetland Report BERGER/ABAM, A06112 17 February 2006 Page 1b of 10 Table No. t USFWS Plant Indicator Status Categories as modified by the National List of Plant Species that Occur In Wetlands: Northwest - Region IX Indicator Status Definition Obligate Wetland (OBL) Occur almost always (estimated probability X99%) under natural conditions in wetlands. Facultative Wetland (FACW) Usually occur in wetlands (estimated probability 6796-99%), but occasionally found in non -wetlands. Facultative (FAG) Equally likely to occur in wetlands or non -wetlands (estimated probability 34%-6636). Facultative Upland (FACU) Usually occur in non -wetlands, but occasionally found in wetlands (1%-3390). Obligate Upland (UPL) Plants that rarely occur (estimated probability X1%) in wetlands, but occur almost always in non -wetlands under natural conditions. No Indicator Status (NI) Insufficient information exists to assign an indicator status. Not Listed (NL) Not on the National List in any region. According to the Washington State Wetlands and Delineation Manual, an area meets the hydrophytic vegetation criteria when, under normal circumstances, more than 50 percent of the dominant species from each stratum are obligate wetland (OBL), facultative wetland (FACW), and/or facultative (FAC) species. For the purposes of the Washington State Wetlands and Delineation Manual protocol, a plus (+) or a minus (-) sign is often included in the designation to specify a higher or lower level of the indicator status for the three facultative categories, and a FAG indicator status is not considered to be an indicator of hydrophytic vegetation (i.e., it is treated in the same way as a facultative upland [FACET], upland [UPLI, and a not -listed [NL] species). IV. Results One palustrine forested, scrub -shrub wetland was identified on the site. This wetland is part of a larger system and is connected to other similar wetlands by Honey Creek. While the system remains isolated by manmade disturbances, it remains connected hydrologically through the watercourse found in the center of the area of study. Because of this connectivity, this wetland is a valuable resource with functional potential and value. The boundary of the wetland was delineated on the site along forested and scrub -shrub communities. Seven data points as illustrated in Figure 4 were established along the wetland boundary to establish a baseline of soil and hydrologic conditions and to sample plant communities. Data sheets were completed for each of these data points, and the Wetland Report 17 February 2006 BERGER/ABAK A06112 Page 11 of 11 points were flagged and labeled to be surveyed. Copies of completed data sheets are included in Appendix I. Data from the collection points was analyzed and a wetland determination was made for each point. Based on this data, a break in topography, plant communities, and hydrologic indicators was located and followed with occasional sampling to ensure consistency with the baseline data collected. This line was determined to be the wetland edge and was flagged and labeled for survey. The following is a description of the findings of the field study. A. Data Points 1. Data Point UL -1 (Attached Data Sheet UL -1) Wetland Report 17 February 2006 Location: This data point is located in the northwest end of the property at the base of a large hill and on the upland edge adjacent to the Honey Creek wetland. Hydrology: No indicators of wetlands hydrology were present at this data point. Soils: The soil survey completed (see attached data sheet UL -1) indicated the soil immediately below the A horizon or at 10 inches was not consistent with the requirements of wetlands soils as outlined in the Washington State Wetlands and Delineation Manual (matrix color of 1, or 2 with redoxomorphic features present, gleyed colors, or presence of organic soils). This data point did not exhibit characteristics of a wetland soil. Vegetation: The vegetation surveyed within and around this data point consisted of red alder (Amus rubra), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor), and creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens). When totaled based on dominance of the stratum, the plant communities did not meet the standards of wetland vegetation outlined above and as established by the Washington State Wetlands and Delineation Manual. The percentage of dominant species with a rating FAC or wetter within this wetland was found to be 48percent. Determination: Because this data point lacked the presence of any of the parameters of a wetland, it was designated an upland data point. BERGERJABAK A06112 Page 12 of 12 W 2. Data Point UL -2 (Attached Data Sheet U1.-2) Location: This data point is located in the southeast end of the property near the fence line of the horse coral and on the upland edge adjacent to the Honey Creek wetland. Hydrology: No indicators of wetlands hydrology were present at this data point. Soils: The soil survey completed (see attached data sheet UL -2) indicated the soil immediately below the A horizon or at 10 inch was consistent with the requirements of wetland soils as outlined in the Washington State Wetlands and Delineation Manual (matrix color of 1, or 2 with redoxomorphic features present). This data point did display characteristics of a wetland soil, however, this may be due to historic site conditions as the site had no indication of required hydrology. Vegetation: The vegetation surveyed within and around this data point consisted of red alder (Alnus rubra), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor), and creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens). When totaled based on dominance of the stratum, the plant communities did meet the standards of wetland vegetation outlined above and as established by the Washington State Wetlands and Delineation Manual. The percentage of dominant species with a rating FAC or wetter within this wetland was found to be 50 percent. Determination. Because this data point lacked the presence of all three of the parameters of a wetland, it was designated an upland data point. Further evaluation of this site and its position in the landscape verified this determination. 3. Data Point Uta (Attached Data Sheet UL -3) Location: This data point is located in the southeast end of the property near the fence line of the horse coral and on the upland edge adjacent to the Honey Wetland Report 17 February 2006 Creek wetland. Hydrology: This site had strong indicators of wetland hydrology, however, observations were not made during the growing season as is recommended by the Washington State Wetlands and Delineation Manual. This data point may require further evaluation during the growing season for a more accurate determination, however, the presence or absence of wetland qualifying conditions at this point do not significantly affect the wetland boundary. Soils: The soil survey completed (see attached data sheet UL -3) indicated the soil immediately below the A horizon or at 10 inches was not consistent with the requirements of wetlands soils as outlined in the Washington State Wetlands and Delineation Manual (matrix color of 1, or 2 with redoxomorphic BERGER/ABAM, A06112 Page 14 of 14 features present, gleyed colors, or presence of organic soils). This data point did not exhibit characteristics of a wetland soil, however, the soils characteristics were close to those of a very gravelly wetland soil. Vegetation. The vegetation surveyed within and around this data point consisted of red alder (Alnus rubra), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens), and skunk cabbage (Lysichiton americanum). When totaled based on dominance of the stratum, the plant communities did meet the standards of wetland vegetation outlined above and as established by the Washington State Wetlands and Delineation Manual. The percentage of dominant species with a rating FAC or wetter within this wetland was found to be 80 percent. Determination: The characteristics at this data point were very difficult to characterize due to the scheduling of field visits outside of the growing season. Because this data point lacked the presence of all three of the parameters of a wetland, it was designated an upland data point. 4. Data Point WL -1 (Attached Data Sheet WL -1) Location: This data point is located in the northwest end of the property at the base of a large hill on the wetland edge within the Honey Creek wetland. Wetland Report 17 February 2006 Hydrology: Strong indicators of wetlands hydrology were present at this data point. Soils: The soil survey completed (see attached data sheet WL -1) indicated the soil immediately below the A horizon or at 10 inches was consistent with the requirements of wetlands soils as outlined in the Washington State Wetlands and Delineation Manual (presence of organic soils). This data had strong characteristics of a wetland soil. Vegetation: The vegetation surveyed within and around this data point consisted of red alder (Alnus rubra), red osier dogwood (Cornus sericea), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), Douglas spirea (Spirea dougliasi), creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens), Swordfern (Athyrium filix-femina), and skunk cabbage (Lysichiton americanum). When totaled based on dominance of the stratum, the plant communities met the standards of wetland vegetation outlined above and as established by the Washington State Wetlands and Delineation Manual. The percentage of dominant species with a rating FAC or wetter surrounding this wetland data point was found to be 100 percent. Determination: This data point demonstrated strong indicators of the parameters of a wetland and it was designated a wetland data point. BERGER/ABAK A06112 Page 15 of 15 5. Data Point WL -2 (Attached Data Sheet WL -2) Location: This data point is located in the northwest end of the property at the base of a large hill on the wetland edge within the Honey Creek wetland. Hydrology: Strong indicators of wetlands hydrology were present at this data point. Soils: The soil survey completed (see attached data sheet WL -2) indicated the soil immediately below the A horizon or at 10 inches was consistent with the requirements of wetlands soils as outlined in the Washington State Wetlands and Delineation Manual (matrix color of 1, or 2 with redoxomorphic features present). This data point did display characteristics of a wetland soil. Vegetation: The vegetation surveyed within and around this data point consisted of red alder (Alnus rubra), red osier dogwood (Cornus sericea), saimonberry (Rubus spectabilis), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor), creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens), ladyfem (Athyrium filix-femina), and English Ivy (Hedera helix). When totaled based on dominance of the stratum, the plant communities did meet the standards of wetland vegetation outlined above and as established by the Washington State Wetlands and Delineation Manual. The percentage of dominant species with a rating FAC or wetter within this wetland was found to be 100 percent. Determination. This data point demonstrated strong indicators of the parameters of a wetland and was designated a wetland data point. S. Data Point WL -3 (Attached Data Sheet WL -3) Location: This data point is located in the farthest northwest end of the property adjacent to NE 10th Street on the wetland edge of Honey Creek wetland. Wetland Report 17 February 2006 Hydrology: Strong indicators of wetlands hydrology were present at this data point. Solis: The soil survey completed (see attached data sheet WL -2) indicated the soil immediately below the A horizon or at 10 inches was consistent with the requirements of wetlands soils as outlined in the Washington State Wetlands and Delineation Manual matrix color of 1, or 2 with redoxomorphic features present). This data point did display characteristics of a wetland soil. Vegetation: The vegetation surveyed within and around this data point consisted red alder (Alnus rubra), western red cedar (Thuja plicata), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), Douglas spirea (Spirea douglassi), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor), and Ladyfern (Athyrium filix-femina). When totaled based on dominance of the stratum, the plant communities did meet the standards of wetland vegetation outlined above and as established by the BERGERIABAK A06112 Page 16 of 16 Washington State Wetlands and Delineation Manual. The percentage of dominant species with a rating FAC or wetter within this wetland was found to be 100 percent. Determination: This data point demonstrated strong indicators of the parameters of a wetland and was designated a wetland data point. 7. Data Point WL -4 (Attached Data Sheet WL -4) Location: This data point is located in the southeast end of the property near the fence line of the horse coral and about 5 feet from the meandering stream channel within the Honey Creek wetland. Hydrology: Strong indicators of wetlands hydrology were present at this data point. Soils: The soil survey completed (see attached data sheet WL4) indicated the soil immediately below the A horizon or at 10 inches was consistent with the requirements of wetlands soils as outlined in the Washington State Wetlands and Delineation Manual (presence of organic soils). This data point exhibits strong characteristics of a wetland soil. Vegetation: The vegetation surveyed within and around this data point consisted of red alder (Alnus rubra), salmonberry (Rebus spectabilis), ladyfern (Athyrium filix-femina), and skunk cabbage (Lysichiton americanum). When totaled based on dominance of the stratum, the plant communities did meet the standards of wetland vegetation outlined above and as established by the Washington State Wetlands and Delineation Manual. The percentage of dominant species with a rating FAC or wetter within this wetland was found to be 100 percent. Determination: This data point demonstrated strong indicators of the parameters of a wetland and was designated a wetland data point. B. Boundary Flags The boundary of the wetland was delineated on the site as the field work of sampling and observation was being completed. Labeled flags were used to identify points on the wetland boundary. The Professional Land Surveyor will be able to survey these points and connect them to be used in conjunction with this report as part of the required documentation for land use actions with the City of Renton. A total of 19 labeled flags were placed; 8 were lettered A through H; and 11 were numbered 1 though 11. The numbered flags start on the northwest end of the property bearing southeast, and the lettered flags start on the southeast end of the property bearing northwest. The two lines meet in the middle and form a single line that, based on the procedures and requirements outlined above, has been determined to be the wetland boundary. Wedand Report 17 February 2006 BERGER/ABAM, A06112 Page 17 of 17 V. References Bigley, Richard. Hull, Sabra. 2000. Recognizing Wetlands. Washington State Department of Natural Resources. Olympia, WA. Brinson, MM. 1993. A Hydrogeomorphic Classification for Wetlands. Wetlands Research Program. Technical Report WRP-DE-4. US Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, August 1993 — Final Report. 79 pp. plus appendices. Cooke, Sarah. 1997. A Field Guide to the Common Wetlands Plants of Western Washington & Northwestern Oregon. Seattle Audubon Society, Seattle, WA. Cowardin, LM, Carter V, Golet TC, and ET LaRoe.1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. USDI Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-78/31. Gale, Pringle, and Snyder. 1973. Soil Survey of King County Area, Washington. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. Icing Conservation District. 2000. King County Soil Descriptions. (hU:/;'4vwtiv.kin cd.orgLpub soil.h=) Kollmorgen Corporation. 1994. Munsell soil color charts. Kollmorgen Corporation, Baltimore, MD. Reed, P.B. Jr. 1988. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands; Washington. Biological Report NERC -88/18.47 for National Wetlands Inventory, Washington, D.C. Reed, P.B. Jr.1993. Northwest supplement (Region 9) species with a change in indicator status or added to the Northwest 1988 list, wetland plants of the state of Washington 1988. U.S. Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service WELUT - 88 (26.9), Washington, D.C. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service in cooperation with USEPA, USFWS, USAC, and North Carolina State University. Version 2.0, June, 1996. "Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States." Washington State Department of Ecology. 1997. "Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual." Ecology Publications #96-94. Wetland Report 17 February 2006 BERGER/ABAM, A06112 Page 18 of 18 $v c N of ToN ANG �JUL 12 2406 R� -Iv el) Appendix I - Field Study Data Sheets DATA FORM 1 ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION BERGER/AS" (1997 Washington State Wetlands Delineation Manual) E " G ' % ` E ' S ' " `111111111011,.. ProjectlSite: Honey Creek Wetland Client: Daniel Bretzke Investigator: David P e Date: 02/06/06 County: Kin State: WA Recent Weather: Rain/Outside of growing season. Plant Community Forested Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® No ❑ Transect ID: Is the site significantly disturbed? Yes ❑ No ® Plot ID: UL -1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes ❑ No ® Plot Location See Figure 4 Explanation: This data point is located towards the northwest end of the property on the adjacent upland bank of the Honey Creek wetland. Due to project timelines and at the request of the client, all field observations and data collection was done in the beginning of February, outside of the growing season and following one of the areas wettest months on record. Because of the difficulty in identifying wetland parameters at this time of year, extra attention was given to secondary indicators. VEGETATION Dominant Species Tree Stratum Total Cover: 80% 1. Red Alder Indicator % Cover FAC 80% Dominant Species Herb Stratum Total Cover: 95% Indicator % Cover 1. Creeping Buttercup FACW 10% 2. 2. 3. 3, 4. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum Total Cover: 90% 1. -Himalayan Blackberry Indicator % Cover FACU 90% 6. 6. 7. 8. 2. 9. 3. 10. 4. 6. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, FAC (not FAC -) 47% Other Notable Species: Criteria Met? Yes ❑ No Remarks: Plants are majority FAC or FACU. Other plants were present but could not be identified due to the lack of foliage, although none of these plants made up more than 10% of the cover of any class. BERGER/ABAM ENGINEERS, INC. 1of 2 SOILS Map Unit Name Primary Indicators: Drainage Class: Moderatley well drained_„_„ (Series and Phase) _Alderwood series ❑ Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ® No ❑ Taxonomy (Subgroup): _AgB ! AgC Water Marks On Hydric Soil List? Yes ❑ No Profile Description: ® Sediment Deposits Depth (inches) Horizon Matrix Color (Munsell Moist) Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc. 1 ”- 0" O N/A NIA NIA Duff layer 0" - 10" A 10 YR 4/3 N/A NIA Sandy Clay Loam 10" - 24" B 10YR 312 N/A I NIA Sandy Clay Loam Hydric Soil Indicators: ❑ Histosol ❑ Concretions/Nodules (w/in 3"; 7 2 mm) ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic contents in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ❑ Reducing Conditions ❑ Listed on National Hydric Soils List ❑ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Redox. Features(w/in 10" Criteria Met? Yes ❑ No Remarks: This soil pit contained some pieces of charcoal that indicate past clearing at this location. This pit is also located at the foot of a large hill containing a pasture and resdidential development that may have casued accumulation of eroded sediment over time. HYDROLOGY ® Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): ❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge ® Aerial Photographs ❑ Other ❑ No Recorded Data Available Comment: No standing water observed in aerial Field Observations: Depth of Surface Water: Depth to Free Water in Pit: Depth to Saturated Soil Criteria Met? Yes NA lin NA lin No saturation evident (in No Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators: ❑ Inundated ❑ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ❑ Water Marks ❑ Drift Lines ® Sediment Deposits ❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches ❑ Water -Stained Leaves ❑ Local soil Survey Data ❑ FAC -Neutral Test ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks Water was not found in the pit and was not observed on the ground surface in the immediate area of the pit. Sediment deposits were identified around the pit but may be due to sheetflow from the uphill pasture and residence where there is little groundcover and a bad erosion problem. WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No I Hydric Soils Present? Yes ❑ No ® Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Remarks This soil pit is being considered as Upland sample #1 (UL -1). This sample point did not exhibit characterisitcs of a wetland. BERGER/ABAM ENGINEERS, INC. 2of DATA FORM 1 ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1997 Washington State Wetlands Delineation Manual) 400*� BFRGFR/ABAM E N G i N E E A 9 s t. Project/Site: Honey Creek Wetland Client: Daniel Bretzke Investigator: David Pyle Date: 02/07106 County: Kin State: WA Recent Weather: Rain/Outside of growing season. Plant Community Forested Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® No ❑ Transect ID: Is the site significantly disturbed? Yes ❑ No ® Plot ID: UL -2 Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes ❑ No ® Plot Location See Figure 4 Explanation: This data point is located towards the southeast end of the property on the adjacent upland bank of the Honey Creek wetland and about 15' from the horse corral fenceline and 20' from the flowthrough stream channel in Honey Creek wetland. Due to project timelines and at the request of the client, all field observations and data collection was done in the beginning of February, outside of the growing season and following one of the areas wettest months on record. Because of the difficulty in identifying wetland parameters at this time of year, extra attention was given to secondary indicators. VEGETATION Dominant Species Tree Stratum Total Cover: 60% 1. Red Alder 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum Total Cover: 60% 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. n6 Dominant Species Herb Stratum Total Cover: 95% Indicator % Cover FAC 60 % 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Indicator % Cover 7. FACU 60% 18. 9. 10. Indicator % Cover Creepinq Buttercup FACW 1 10% Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, FAC (not FAC -) Other Notable Species: Criteria Met? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Plants are majority FAC or FACU. The criteria was met, but this was due to the strong presence of Red alder, which is FAC. Other plants were present but could not be identified due to the lack of foliage, although none of these plants made up more than 10% of the cover of any class. BERGERIABANI ENGINEERS, INC. 1of 2 SOILS Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Moderatlev well drained (Series and Phase) _Alderwood series Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ® No ❑ Taxonomy (Subgroup): _AgB l AgC On Hydric Soil List? Yes ❑ No Profile Description: Water Marks Depth (inches) Horizon Matrix Color (Munsell Motile Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc. 111-01, O NIA N/A NIA Duff layer 0" - 6" A 7.5 YR 313 NIA NIA Sandy Loam 6"- 12" A 10YR 312 7.5 YR 518 *See note Loamy Sand 12" - 24" B 10 YR 412 7.5 YR 518 *See note Sandy Loam Hydric Soil Indicators: ❑ Histosol ❑ Concretions/Nodules (w/in 3"; > 2 mm) ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic contents in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ❑ Reducing Conditions ❑ Listed on National Hydric Soils List ® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ® Redox. Features(w/in 10" Criteria Met? Yes 0 No II Remarks: This pit is also located at the foot of a small hill below a horse corral and that may have casued accumulation of eroded sediment over time. The soils in this pit meet the criteria of a hydric soil due to the low chroma and presencer of massing/redox features in the profile < 10". *These layers contain massing evident around rocks/pebbles found in the soil profile that may be due to deposition of this material at one time during a major flood event or due to a migrating stream channel. HYDROLOGY ® Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks) ❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge ® Aerial Photographs ❑ Other ❑ No Recorded Data Available Comment: No standing water observed in aerial Field Observations: Depth of Surface Water: Depth to Free Water in Pit: Depth to Saturated Soil: No satu Criteria Met? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators: ❑ Inundated ❑ Saturated in Upper 12 inches ❑ Water Marks ❑ Drift Lines ❑ Sediment Deposits ❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) NA in. ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches ❑ Water -Stained Leaves NA in. ❑ Local soil Survey Data ❑ FAC -Neutral Test ent in. ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks Water was not found in the pit and was not observed on the ground surface in the immediate area of the pit. Water stained leaves were identified around the pit but may be due to short periods of inundation during major storm events. 11 WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Hydric Soils Present? Yes ❑ No ® I Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Remarks This soil pit is being considered as Upland sample #2 (UL -2). Although this sample pit did meet the requirements for soils and vegetation, the indicators were not strong, and the point did not have any indication of wetland hydrology even though the field sampling was done immediately followingf one of the areas wettest months on record. This sam le oint did not exhibit all of the characterisitcs of a wetland. BERGERIABAM ENGINEERS, INC. 2of 2 DATA FORM 1 ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1997 Washington State Wetlands Delineation Manual) BFRGER/ARAM E h G N<< 4 s Project/Site: Honey Creek Wetland Client: Daniel Bretzke Investigator: David Pyie Date: 02/07/06 County: Kin State: WA Recent Weather: Rain/Outside of growing season. Plant Community Forested Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® No ❑ Transect ID: Is the site significantly disturbed? Yes ❑ No ® Plot ID: UL -3 Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes ❑ No ® Plot Location See Figure 4 Explanation: This data point is located towards the southeast and of the property on the adjacent upland bank of the Honey Creek wettand and about 20' from the horse corral fencline and 10' from the flowthrough stream channel in Honey Creek wetland. This data point was placed as an additional point to verify the presence of a finger off of the wetland, howevor due the seasonality of the field work, it was difficult to make an accurate determination. Due to project timelines and at the request of the client, all field observations and data collection was done in the beginning of February, outside of the growing season and following one of the areas wettest months on record. Because of the difficulty in identifying wetland parameters at this time of year, extra attention was given to secondary indicators. VW( t:1 A I iVN Dominant Species Tree Stratum Total Cover: 60% Dominant Species Herb Stratum Total Cover: 95% 1. Red Alder Indicator FAC % Cover 70% 1. Creepi 2. Skunk 2. 3. 4. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum Total Cover: 60% 1. Himalayan Blackberry Indicator FACU % Cover 30% 5. 6. 7. & 2. 3. Salmonber FAC+ 20% 9. 10, 4. 5. Indicator % Cover I Buttercup I FACW I 30% abbaae OBL 10% Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, FAC (not FAC Other Notable Species: Criteria Met? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Plants are majority FAC or FACW. The criteria was met, but this was due to the strong presence of Red alder, which is FAC. Other plants were present but could not be identified due to the lack of foliage, although none of these plants made up more than 10% of the cover of any class. BERGERIABAM ENGINEERS, INC. tof 2 SOILS Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Moderatley well drained (Series and Phase) _Alderwood series Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ® No ❑ Taxonomy (Subgroup): _AgB / AgC On Hydric Soil List? Yes ❑ No Profile Description: Water Marks Matrix Color (Munsell Mottle Calors Motile Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, Depth {inches) Horizon Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc. 111-011 0 NIA NIA NIA Or anic Laver 0" - 6" A 10 YR 4I3 NIA NIA Sandy Loam 6" - 18" A 7.5 YR 412 NIA NIA Loamy Sand Hydric Soil Indicators: ❑ Histosol ❑ Concretions/Nodules Win 3°; > 2 mm) ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic contents in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ❑ Reducing Conditions ❑ Listed on National Hydric Soils List ❑ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Redox. Features(w/in 10" Criteria Met? Yes ❑ No Remarks: This pit is also located at the foot of a small hill below a horse corral and that may have casued accumulation of eroded sediment over time. This pit contained rocks/pebbles found in the soil profile that may be due to deposition of this material at one time during a major flood event or due to a migrating stream channel. The reddish color of the soil gravel gave off false indicators of redoximorphic features, and after further evaluation was not determined to be a wetland soil. NYnanl nnv ® Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): ❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge ® Aerial Photographs ❑ Other ❑ No Recorded Data Available Comment: No standing water observed in aerial Field Observations: Depth of Surface Water: Depth to Free Water in Pit: Depth to Saturated Soil: Criteria Met? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators: ❑ Inundated ® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ® Water Marks ❑ Drift Lines ® Sediment Deposits ® Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) 0 in. ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches ® Water -Stained Leaves 4 in. ❑ Local soil Survey Data ❑ FAC -Neutral Test 0 (in.) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks Water was found in the pit and was observed on the ground surface in the immediate area of the pit. Water stained leaves and other secondary indicators were identified around the pit but may be due to short periods of inundation during major storm events. WFTI Akin n;=T1=RMINAT[(]N Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Hydric Soils Present? Yes ❑ No ® I Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Remarks This soil pit is being considered as Upland sample #3 (UL -3). Although this sample pit did meet the requirements for hydrology, the soil and vegetation indicators were not strong. This point may be innundated because the field sampling was done immediately following one of the areas wettest months on record. This sample point did not exhibit all of the characterisitcs of a wetland, and further site evaluation at this point may be required during the growing season for a more accurate determination_ BERGERIABAM ENGINEERS, INC. tat 2 DATA FORM 4 ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1997 Washington State Wetlands Delineation Manual) A^ BERGER/ARAM E F C X E E 4 S 1 a c. `/' Project/Site: Honey Creek Wetland Date: 02/06/06 Client: Daniel Bretzke County: Kin Investigator: David Pyle State: WA Recent Weather: Rain/Outside of growing season. Plant Community Forested Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® No ❑ Transect ID: Is the site significantly disturbed? Yes ❑ No ® Plot ID: WL -1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes ❑ No ® Plot Location See Figure 4 Explanation: This data point is located towards the northwest end of the property within the Honey Creek wetland. Due to project timelines and at the request of the client, all field observations and data collection was done in the beginning of February, outside of the growing season and following one of the areas wettest months on record. Because of the difficulty in identifying wetland parameters at this time of year, extra attention was given to secondary indicators. VEGETATION Dominant Species Tree Stratum Total Cover: 80% Dominant Species Herb Stratum Total Cover: 25% 1. Red alder Indicator FAC % Cover 80% 1. 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum Total Cover: 80% 1. Red Osler dogwood Indicator FACW % Cover 50% 5. 6. 7. 8. 2. Salmonber FAC+ 20% 9. 3. Douglas sirea FACW 10% 10. 4. 5. Indicator % Cover Creeping buttercup FACW 10% Swordfern FACU 10% Skunk cabbage 0131- 5% Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, FAC (not FAC -) Other Notable Species: Criteria Met? Yes ® No ❑ 100% Remarks: Plants are majority FAC or FACW. Other plants were present but could not be identified due to the lack of foliage, although none of these plants made up more than 10% of the cover of any class. BERGERIABAM ENGINEERS, INC. 1 of 2 SOILS Drainage Class: Aoderatley well drained Mapped Type? Yes ® No ❑ Map Unit Name (Series and Phase) Alderwood series�� Field Observations Confirm Organic contents in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Yes [] No Taxonomy (Subgroup): _AgS 1 AgC On H dric Soil List? ® 5ulfidic Odor ❑ filDescription: Matrix Color (Munsell P12"-0 Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance! 5izelContrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc. ches) Horizon Moist) (Munsell Moist) NIA DufflDetritus la er O NIA N/A NIA NIA Or anic/Fibric 0"-24" O 10 YR 211 Criteria Met? Yes Na so il throughout ale. Some sand was mixed in to the sail, and this Hydric Soil Indicators: ❑ Concretions/Nodules (w/in 3'; 7 2 mm) ❑ Histosol ❑High Organic contents in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Sails ® 5ulfidic Odor ❑ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ® Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on National Hydric Soils List ® Reducing Conditions Other (Explain in Remarks) ® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ❑ Redox. Features wiin 10' Criteria Met? Yes Na so il throughout ale. Some sand was mixed in to the sail, and this Remarks: This soil pit consisted of an organic fiil! slope may be due to the serious historic erosion problem o p HYDROLOGY Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology indicators- ® Recorded ❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge primary Indicators: ❑ inundated ® Aerial Photographs ® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches [] Other ❑ No Recorded Data Available ® Water Marks Drift tines Comment: No standin water observed in aerial hoto. ® Sediment Deposits ® Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Field Observations: Secondary indicators (2 or more required) Channels in Upper 12 inches 4 in. Oxidized Root Depth of Surface Water: Water -Stained Leaves 1 in Local soil Survey Data Depth to Free Water in Pit: FAC -Neutral Test Q in. ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) Depth to Saturated Soil: Criteria Met? ---Yes No Remarks This data point was saturated to the surface and emitted s { a g �f�nopynls site d theseasonalitysonality extracted, the d No standing water was observed in the aerial photo howe photo may not be a fair indicator of hydrology. WETLAND DETERMINAT10N Lj Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ❑ is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Hydric Soils Present? Yes Remarks This soil pit is being considered as Wetland sample #1 (WL -1). This sample point contains primary and secondary characterisitcs of a wetland. 2of 2 BERGERiABAM ENGINEERS, INC. DATA FORM 1 ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1997 Washington State Wetlands Delineation Manual) 0011111111111, BFRGER/ARAM E h u I M E f a$ 1 i C Project/Site: Honey Creek Wetland Date: 02/06106 Client: Daniel Bretzke County: Kin Investigator: David Pyle State: WA Recent Weather: Rain/Outside of growing season. Plant Community Forested Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® No ❑ Transect ID: Is the site significantly disturbed? Yes ❑ No ® Plot ID: WL -2 Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes ❑ No ® Plot Location See Figure 4 Explanation: This data point is located towards the northwest end of the property within the Honey Creek wetland. Due to project timelines and at the request of the client, ail field observations and data collection was done in the beginning of February, outside of the growing season and following one of the areas wettest months on record. Because of the difficulty in identifying wetland parameters at this time of year, extra attention was given to secondary indicators. VEGETATION Dominant Species Tree Stratum Total Cover: 80% 1. Red alder 2 3. 4. Sapling./Shrub Stratum Total Cover: 85% 1. Red osier 2. SalmonbE 3. Himalayas 4. 5. Dominant Species Herb Stratum Total Cover: 30% Indicator % Cover FAC 80% 1. Indicator % Cover Creeping buttercup FACW 10% Swordfern FACU 10% English ivy Not listed 10% Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, FAC (not FAG -} 100% Other Notable Species: Criteria Met? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks. Plants are majority FAC or FACW. Other plants were present but could not be identified due to the lack of foliage, although none of these plants made up more than 10% of the cover of any class. BERGERIABAM ENGINEERS, INC. 1of 2 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 110. Indicator % Cover FACW 50% FAC+ 20% FACU 15% Indicator % Cover Creeping buttercup FACW 10% Swordfern FACU 10% English ivy Not listed 10% Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, FAC (not FAG -} 100% Other Notable Species: Criteria Met? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks. Plants are majority FAC or FACW. Other plants were present but could not be identified due to the lack of foliage, although none of these plants made up more than 10% of the cover of any class. BERGERIABAM ENGINEERS, INC. 1of 2 SOILS Map Unit Name Drainage Class: _ModeratleY well _drained __ (Series and Phase) _Alderwood series Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ® No ❑ Taxonomy (Subgroup): _AgB I AgC On Hydric Soil List? Yes ❑ No Profile Description: ® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches Depth (inches) Horizon Metrix Color (Munsell Mottle Colors Motile Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc. 2"- 0" O NA NIA NIA Duff/Detritus layer 0" - 4" A 7.5 YR 312 NIA NIA Sandy Clay Loam 4" -12" A 10 YR 3I1 NIA NIA 1 Sandy Clay Loam 12" - 18" B 7.5 YR 311 NIA NIA Loam Depth to Free Water in Pit: 5 in_ ❑ Local soil Survey Data Hydric Soil Indicators: ❑ FAC -Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: ❑ Histosol ❑ ConcretionslNodules (w/in 3", > 2 mm) ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic contents in Surface Layer in Sandy Solis ❑ Suifidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ® Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ® Reducing Conditions ❑ Listed on National Hydric Soils List ® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ® Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Redox. Features(w/in 10" Criteria Met? Yes El No ❑ Remarks: This soil pit contained a soil profile that was primarily of a low chroma color (< 1), although it had no evidence of redoxamorphic features. HYDROLOGY ® Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: ❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: ® Aerial Photographs ❑ Inundated ❑ Other ® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ❑ No Recorded Data Available ® Water Marks Comment: No standin water observed in aerialphoto._ ® Drift Lines ® Sediment Deposits Field Observations: ® Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Depth of Surface Water: 0 in. ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches ® Water -Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: 5 in_ ❑ Local soil Survey Data ❑ FAC -Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: Win.) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) Criteria Met? Yes U No H Remarks This data point was saturated nearly to the surface and had obvious indicators of inundation during major storm eve nts. WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is this Sam Tmg Point Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks This soil pit is being considered as Wetland sample #2 (WL -2). This sample point contains primary and secondary characterisites of a wetland. BERGERIABAM ENGINEERS, INC. 2of 2 DATA FORM 7 ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1997 Washington State Wetlands Delineation Manual) 40m4k BERGER/ABAM E N 9 1 x c E� 9 i Y t. Project/Site: Honey Creek Wetland Client: Daniel Bretzke Investigator: David Pyte Date: 02/06/06 County: Kin State: WA Recent Weather: Rain/Outside of growing season. Plant Community Forested Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® No ❑ Transect ID: Is the site significantly disturbed? Yes ❑ No ® Plot ID: WL -3 Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes ❑ No ® Plot Location See Figure 4 Explanation: This data point is located towards the farthest northwest end of the property within the Honey Creels wetland adjacent to NE= 10th Street. Due to project timelines and at the request of the client, all field observations and data collection was done in the beginning of February, outside of the growing season and following one of the areas wettest months on record. Because of the difficulty in identifying wetland parameters at this time of year, extra attention was given to secondary indicators. VEGETATION Dominant Species Tree Stratum Total Cover: 50% 1. Red alder 2. Western red cedar 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum Total Cover: 50% 1. Salmonbe 2. Douglas spirea 3. Himalayan blas 4. 5. Dominant Species Herb Stratum Total Cover: 10% Indicator FAC % Cover 30% 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. FAC 20% Indicator % Cover FAC+ 20% FACW 20% J FACU 10% 10. Swordfern Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, FAC (not FAC -) 100% Other Notable Species: Criteria Met? Yes ® No ❑ Indicator % Cover II FACU I 10% Remarks: Plants are majority FAC or FACW. Other plants were present but could not be identified due to the lack of foliage, although none of these plants made up more than 10% of the cover of any class. BERGER/ABAM ENGINEERS, INC. 1of 2 SOILS Map Unit Name Primary Indicators: Drainage Class: Moderatley well drained (Series and Phase) _Alderwood series ® Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ® No E]Taxonomy (Subgroup): _AgB I AgC Water Marks On Hydric Soil List? Yes ❑ No Profile Description: ❑ Sediment Deposits Depth (inches) Horizon Matrix Color (Munsell Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc. 1 "- 0" O NIA NIA NIA Duff/Detritus layer 011-8. "-8" A 10 YR 212 NIA NIA Sandy Clay Loam 8'-16" A 7.5 YR 3I2 2.5 YR 516 Few/Small -Sandy Clay Loam Hydric Soil Indicators: ❑ Histosol ❑ Concretions/Nodules (w/in 3% > 2 mm) ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic contents in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ® Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ® Reducing Conditions ❑ Listed on National Hydric Soils List ® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ® Other (Explain in Remarks) ® Redox. Features(w/in 10" Criteria Met? Yes 0 No Remarks: This soil pit consisted of an organic soil throughout the profile. Some sand was mixed in to the soil, and this may be due to the serious historic erosion problem on the uphill slope. HYDROLOGY ® Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): ❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge ® Aerial Photographs ❑ Other ❑ No Recorded Data Available 3mment: No standing water observed in aerial Field Observations: Depth of Surface Water: Depth to Free Water in Pit: Depth to Saturated Soil: Criteria Met? Yes ® No Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators: ❑ Inundated ® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ® Water Marks ® Drift Lines ❑ Sediment Deposits ❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) 0 in. ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches ® Water -Stained Leaves 5 in. El Remarks This data point was saturated to the surface and emitted a strong sulfuric smell when the profile was extracted. No standing water was observed in the aerial photo howevor there is a strong canopy on site and the seasonality of the photo may not be a fair indicator of hydrology. WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No ❑ I Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks This soil pit is being considered as Wetland sample #3 (WL -3). This sample point contains primary and secondary characterisitcs of a wetland. BERGERIABAM ENGINEERS, INC. 2of 2 Local sail Survey Data ❑ FAC -Neutral Test 4 in. ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks This data point was saturated to the surface and emitted a strong sulfuric smell when the profile was extracted. No standing water was observed in the aerial photo howevor there is a strong canopy on site and the seasonality of the photo may not be a fair indicator of hydrology. WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No ❑ I Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks This soil pit is being considered as Wetland sample #3 (WL -3). This sample point contains primary and secondary characterisitcs of a wetland. BERGERIABAM ENGINEERS, INC. 2of 2 DATA FORM 1 ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1997 Washington State Wetlands Delineation Manual) .4110n� BERGER/ABAM '1111111111111111W Project/Site: Honey Creek Wetland Client: Daniel Bretzke Investigator: David Pyle Date: 02/07/06 County: Kin State: WA Recent Weather: Rain/Outside of growing season. Plant Community Forested Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® No ❑ Transect ID: Is the site significantly disturbed? Yes ❑ No ® Plot 10: WL -4 Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes ❑ No ® Plot Location See Figure 4 Explanation: This data point is located towards the southeast end of the property within the Honey Creek wetland approximately 5 feet from the meandering stream channel. Due to project timelines and at the request of the client, all field observations and data collection was done in the beginning of February, outside of the growing season and following one of the areas wettest months on record. Because of the difficulty in identifying wetland parameters at this time of year, extra attention was given to secondary 11 indicators. V t(at I A I JUN Dominant Species Tree Stratum Total Cover: 80% Indicator % Cover 1. Red aider FAC 80% Dominant Species Herb Stratum Total Cover: 30% Indicator. % Cover 1. Lady fern FAC 10% 2. 2. Skunk cabbage OBL 20% 3. 3. 4. 4. Sa iin !Shrub Stratum Total Cover: 50% Indicator % Cover 1. Salmonber FAC+ 50% 5, 6. 7. 8. 2. 9. 3. 10. 4. 5. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, FAC (not FAC -) Other Notable Species: Criteria Met? Yes ® No ❑ 100% Remarks: Plants are majority FAC or OBL. Other plants were present but could not be identified due to the lack of foliage, although none of these plants made up more than 10% of the cover of any class. BERGERIABAM ENGINEERS, INC. 1 o 2 SOILS Map Unit Name Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Drainage Class: Moderatiev well drained (Series and Phase) _Alderwood series Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ® No ❑ Taxonomy (Subgroup): _AgB I AgC ® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches On Hydric Soil List? Yes ❑ No Profile Description: to. ® Drift Lines ® Sediment Deposits Depth (inches) Horizon Matrix Color (Munsell Moist) Mottle Calors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc. 0"- 4" O 10 YR 211 Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) NIA N/A Muck/Detritus 4" - 24" O 10 YR 2/1 NIA N/A Or anic/Fibric 1 in. ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: ❑ Histosol ❑ Concretions/Nodules Win 3"; > 2 mm) ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic contents in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ® Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ® Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ® Reducing Conditions ❑ Listed on National Hydric Soils List ® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ® Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Redox. Features whn 10" Criteria Met? Yes 1K No FJ Remarks: This soil pit consisted of an organic soil throughout the profile. Some sand was mixed in to the soil, and this may be due to the serious historic erosion problem on the uphill slope. HYDROLOGY ® Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): ❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge ® Aerial Photographs ❑ Other ❑ No Recorded Data Available Comment: No standing water observed in aerial Field Observations: Depth of Surface Water: Depth to Free Water in Pit: Depth to Saturated Soil: Criteria Met? Yes ja No " Remarks This data point was saturated to the surface and emitted a strong sulfuric smell when the profile was extracted. No standing water was observed in the aerial photo howevor there is a strong canopy on site and the seasonality of the photo may not be a fair indicator of hydrology. WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is this Sam lin Point Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks This soil pit is being considered as Weiland sample #4 (WL -4). This sample point contains primary and secondary characterisitcs of a wetland. BE=RGERIABAM ENGINEERS, INC. 2o(2 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators: ❑ Inundated ® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ® Water Marks to. ® Drift Lines ® Sediment Deposits ® Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) 0in. ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches ® Water -Stained Leaves alt.altl ❑ Local soil Survey Data ❑ FAC -Neutral Test 1 in. ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) Criteria Met? Yes ja No " Remarks This data point was saturated to the surface and emitted a strong sulfuric smell when the profile was extracted. No standing water was observed in the aerial photo howevor there is a strong canopy on site and the seasonality of the photo may not be a fair indicator of hydrology. WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is this Sam lin Point Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks This soil pit is being considered as Weiland sample #4 (WL -4). This sample point contains primary and secondary characterisitcs of a wetland. BE=RGERIABAM ENGINEERS, INC. 2o(2 r GEODIMENSIONS, INC. 6210 FAIRWAY PL SE SNOQUALMIE, WA. 98065 425-458-4488 Wednesday, June 21, 2006 8:16:58 AM PROJECT: BRETZKE LLA Job.6042-LLA DEV E ITYOF RENYON lNG JUL 12 20 RECEIVED CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: EXISTING PARCEL A AREA Point Number Description Sta Northing Easting Searing ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Distance 30 0+00.00 5022.845 9337.651 S88016'10"E 131.56 ft 28 1+31.56 5018.872 9469.151 S00002'42"W 296.29 ft 27 4+27.85 4722.582 9468.918 N88020'02"W 131.69 ft 13 5+59.54 4726.411 9337.284 N00004'15"E 296.44 ft 30 8+55.98 5022.851 9337.651 -----------------------------------------------------------------•------ Closing latitude = 0.00574 Closing departure = -0.00055 Closing bearing = S05031137"E Closing distance = 0.00576 Total traverse length = 855.98 (855.98) Total error of closure = 1/148557 Error of closure in latitude = 1/149251 Errcr of closure in departure = 1/1542453 Area = 38992.90 SQ ET Area = 0.90 ACRES GEODIMENSIONS, INC. 6210 FAIRWAY PL SE SNQQUALMIE, WA. 98065 425-458-4488 Wednesday, June 21, 2006 10:44:19 AM PROJECT: BRETZKE LLA Job NO. 6042 -LLA CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: NEW LOT A Point Number Description Sta Northing Easting Bearing ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Distance 30 0+00.00 5022.845 9337.651 S88016110"E 121.65 ft 92 1+21.65 5019.172 9459.246 S00002142"W 94.00 ft 96 2+15.65 4925.172 9459.172 N88016'12"W 121.69 ft 97 3+37.33 4928.845 9337.537 N00004'15"E 94.00 ft 30 4+31.33 5022.845 9337.654 Closing latitude = -0.00001 ---------- Closing departure = 0.00237 Closing bearing = N89039115"W Closing distance = 0.00237 Total traverse length = 431.34 (431.33) Total error of closure = 1/182380 Error of closure in latitude = 1/30224483 Error of closure in departure = 1/182384 Area = 11431.83 SQ FT Area = 0.26 ACRES GEODIMENSIONS, INC. 6210 FAIRWAY PL SE SNOQUALMIE, WA. 98065 425-458-4488 Wednesday, June 21, 2006 8:20:07 AM PROJECT: BRETZKE LLA Job NO. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 6042 -LLA CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance,or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: EXISTING PARCEL 8 AREA Point Number Description Sta Northing Easting Bearing Distance ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 28 0+00.00 5018.872 9469.150 S8801611011E 100.04 ft 29 1+00.04 5015.851 9569.145 S00002'42"W 296.18 ft 26 3+96.22 4719.671 9568.912 N88020'02"W 100.04 ft 27 4+96.26 4722.580 9468.914 N00002'42"E 296.29 ft 28 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 7+92.56 5018.870 9469.147 Closing latitude - -0.00247 Closing departure = -0.00325 Closing bearing = N52043'32"E Closing distance = 0.00408 Total traverse length = 792.55 (792.56) Total error of closure = 1/194144 Error of closure in latitude = 1/320563 Error of closure in departure = 1/243979 Area = 29623.74 SQ FT Area = 0.68 ACRES GEODIMENSIONS, INC. 6210 FAIRWAY PL SE SNOQUALMIE, WA, 98065 425-458-4488 Wednesday, June 21, 2006 10:48:34 AM PROJECT: BRETZKE LLA Job NO. 6042 -LLL CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: NEW LOT B AREA Point Number Description Sta Northing Easting Bearing ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Distance 92 0+00.00 5019.172 9459.241 S88016'10"E 70.00 ft 91 0+70.00 5017.058 9529.210 S00°02142"w 124.00 ft 94 1+94.00 4893.058 9529.112 N88016110"W 70.00 ft 93 2+64.00 4895.172 9459.144 N00002142"E 124.00 ft 92 3+88.00 5019.172 9459.241 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Closing latitude = 0,00000 Closing departure = 0.00000 Closing bearing = N90000100"W Closing distance = 0.00000 Total traverse length = 388.00 (388.00) Total error of closure = 1/999999 Error of closure in latitude = 1/999999 Error of closure in departure = 1/999999 :..- -; , , Area = 8676.24 SQ FT d Area = 0.20 ACRES GEODIMENSIONS, INC. 6210 FAIRWAY PL SE SNCQUALMIE, WA. 98065 425-458-4486 Wednesday, June 21, 2006 8:24:41 AM PROJECT: BRETZKE LLA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Job NO. 6042 -LLA CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: EXISTING PARCEL C AREA Point Number Description Sta Northing Easting Bearing Distance ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 29 0+00.00 5015.851 9569.148 S88016'10"E 100.04 ft 24 1+00.04 5012.830 9669.142 S00002142"W 296.07 ft 25 3+96.11 4716.760 9668.910 N88020'02"W 100.04 ft 26 4+96.15 4719.669 9568.912 N00002142"E 296.18 ft 29 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7+92.33 5015.849 9569.145 Closing latitude = -0.00247 Closing departure = -0.00325 Closing bearing = N52043'32"E Closing distance = 0.00408 Total traverse length = 792.33 (792.33) Total error of closure = 1/194090 Error of closure in latitude = 1./320474 Error of closure in departure = 1/243911 Area = 29612.48 SQ FT Area = 0.68 ACRES GEODIMENSIONS, INC. 6210 FAIRWAY PL SE SNCQUALMIE, WA. 98065 425-458-4488 Wednesday, June 21, 2006 10:56:18 AM PROJECT: BRETZKE LLA Job NO. 6042-LLA ----------------------------------------------------------------------- CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: Point Number Description Sta Northing Easting Bearing ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Distance 97 0+00.00 4928.845 9337.535 S88016112"E 121.69 ft 96 1+21.69 4925.172 9459.170 S00002'42"W 30.00 ft 93 1+51.69 4895.172 9459.146 S88016'10"E 70.00 ft 94 2+21.69 4893.058 9529.114 N00002'42"E 124.00 ft 91 3+45.69 5017.058 9529.211 S88016110"E 140.00 ft 24 4+85.69 5012.830 9669.148 S00002'42"W 129.06 ft 87 6+14.74 4883.770 9669.046 S88016'1011E 30.01 ft 89 6+44.76 4882.864 9699.043 S00°02'42"W 166.98 ft 90 8+11.74 4715.884 9698.911 N88020'02"W 361.78 ft 13 11+73.52 4726.402 9337.284 N00°0411511E 202.44 ft 97 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 13+75.96 4928.842 9337.535 Closing latitude = -0.00324 Closing departure = -0.00040 Closing bearing = N07000149"E Closing distance = 0.00326 Total traverse length = 1375.96 (1375.96) Total error of closure = 1/421925 Error of closure in latitude = 1/425106 Error of closure in departure = 1/3455458 Area = 83130.91 SQ FT Area = 1.91 ACRES GEODIMENSIONS, INC. 6210 FAIRWAY PL SE SNOQUALMIE, WA. 96065 425-458-4488 Wednesday, June 21, 2006 8:28:13 AM PROJECT: BRETZKE LLA Job ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NO. 6042 -LLA CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: EXISTING PARCEL D AREA Point Number Description 5ta Northing Easting Bearing Distance ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 24 0+00.00 5012.830 9669.146 S88016'10"E 100.04 ft 60 1+00.04 5009.809 9769.140 S00002142"W 120.05 ft 61 2+20.10 4889.759 9769.046 S88016110"E 70.03 ft 62 2+90.13 4887.644 9839.044 S00002'42"W 175.83 ft 63 4+65.95 4711.814 9838.906 N88020'02"W 170.07 ft 25 6+36.02 4716.759 9668.908 N00002'42"E 296.07 ft 24 9+32.09 5012.829 9669.140 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Closing latitude = -0.00121 Closing departure = -0.00552 Closing bearing = N77040'59"E Closing distance = 0.00565 Total traverse length = 932.09 (932.09) Total error of closure = 1/164968 Error of closure in latitude = 1/773345 Error of closure in departure = 1/168855 Area = 41911.74 SQ FT Area = 0.96 ACRES GEODIMENSIONS, INC. 6210 FAIRWAY PL SE SNOQUALMIE, WA. 98065 425-458-4488 Thursday, June 22, 2006 6:14:27 AM PROJECT: BRETZKE LLA Job NO. 6042 -LLA CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: NEW LOT D Point Number Description Sta Northing Easting Bearing Distance ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 24 0+00.00 5012.830 9669.146 S88016'10"E 100.04 ft 60 1+00.04 5009.809 9769.140 S00002142"W 120.05 ft 61 2+20.10 4889.759 9769.046 S88016'10"E 70.03 £t 62 2+90.13 4887.644 9839.044 S00002'42"W 175.83 ft 63 4+65.95 4711.814 9838.906 N88020102"W 140.06 ft 90 6+06.01 4715.886 9698.905 N00002'42"E 166.98 ft 89 7+72.99 4882.866 9699.036 N88016'10"W 30.01 ft 87 8+03.00 4883.772 9669.040 N00002142"E 129.06 ft 24 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 9+32.05 5012.832 9669.141 Closing Latitude = 0.00253 Closing departure = -0.00454 Closing bearing = S60050'51"E Closing distance = 0.00520 Total traverse length = 932.06 (932.05) Total error of closure = 1/179166 Error of closure in latitude = 1/367793 Error of closure in departure = 1/205153 Area = 36901.87 SQ FT Area = 0.85 ACRES After record return to: DEVELOPMENT PUINNING CITY OF PENTON Daniel Bretzke JUL 12 206 PO Box 1151 RECEIVED Mercer Island, WA 98040 Grantor(s): Daniel Bretzke Grantee(s)Larry Rogers AGREEMENT 1-1.351111`,'131 We 17.101 Doll �t11u• 11 Ct11 �� s� �l��i � AND LARRY ROGERS This Agreement made on 1.,9i , 2006, between Daniel and Fumiko Bretzke, a married couple, of 5521 NE 10 ' ST, Renton, WA 98059 and Larry Rogers, an unmarried man, of 5603 NE 10'' St, Renton, WA 98059 WHEREAS: Daniel and Fumiko Bretzke (hereafter referred to as "BRETZKE") is the owner, in fee simple, of those certain parcels of real propertS legally described as follows 102305 358 W 100 FT OF E 430 FT OF E 1/2 OF S 10 AC OF N 50 AC OF E 112 OF NE 114 LESS N 30 FT, in King County, Washington. Tax Parcel Number: 102305935805 And Larry Rogers is the owner, in fee simple, of those certain parcels of real property legally described as follows: 102305 367 W 170 FT OF E 330 FT OF E 112 OF OF S 10 AC OF N 60 AC OF E 112 OF NE 114 LESS S 120 FT OF N 150 FT OF E 70 FT LESS N 30 FT OF SO S 10 ACRES located in King County, Washington. Tax Parcel Number: 1023059357 And to achieve maximum value and benefit for both owners in their future subdivision of their property, a mutual agreement is made as follows WITNESSETH NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual promises, covenants and agreements contained herein, and the mutual benefits to be derived therefore, the parties hereto do hereby promise, covenant and agree as follows ROGERS agrees to quit claim deed to BRETZKE, a strip of land 30 feet wide by 174 long, over the southeast corner of the following property as described above. A fully executed deed shall accompany a record of survey boundary line adjustment, which is to be submitted, reviewed and approved by the City of Renton, and subsequently recorded with King County Records. The location of the strip is identified on a drawing as shown in attachment A. ROGERS agrees to record an joint use ingress, egress and utility access easement, which meets the requirements for a private road access with a fire department turn around at the end of the easement. The easement can be adjusted under this agreement to meet any approval conditions required by the City of Renton. This easement will be recorded on a record of survey boundary line adjustment, as approved by the City of Renton. This easement will be located in the northwestern portion of the property approximately 20 feet by 149 feet, and adjoining perpendicular strip 26 x 50. The location of the strip is identified on a drawing as shown in attachment A. BRETZKE agrees to record a joint use ingress, egress and utility access easement, which meets the requirements for a private road access with a fire department turn around at the' end of the easement. The easement can be adjusted under this agreement to meet any approval conditions required by the City of Renton. This easement will be recorded on a record of survey boundary line adjustment, as approved by the City of Renton. This easement will be located in the northwestern portion of the property approximately 6 feet by 149 feet, and an adjoining perpendicular strip 26 x 40 The location of the strip is identified on a drawing as shown in attachment A. BRETZKE will record sewer easements, which accommodate sewer for ROGERS existing house, and two future new lots. This easement to be recorded after engineering plans have been submitted and approved by the City of Renton. BRETZKE and ROGERS, in consideration of ROGERS's quitclaim of property to BRETZKE agree to the following: Existing Garage. Rogers will paint and install roof with overhangs to match existing house. Rogers will remove a portion of the garage if the City of Renton does not approve a design variance as submitted with a the short plat site plan approval. Otherwise garage will be kept as long as possible to allow Rogers business use. If City of Renton requires a separate variance application, Rogers will pay for costs associated with processing of variance. Variance application must not delay the construction of processing of the Bretzke or Rogers short plat. Boundary Line adjustment Bretzke to pay fees and costs associated to submit Boundary line adjustment to City Renton, and preparation of materials. Bretzke will pay for cost associated with the survey of the boundary line adjustment. Costs for title report, transfer of property to be attributed to BRETZKE and ROGERS as customary for real estate transactions in Seattle. Wetland Study and Delineation BRETZKE to pay for wetland study and delineation for Boundary Line Adjustment. ROGERS to be responsible for wetland studies need for ROGERS subdivision. Survey BRETZKE to pay for a survey of the portion of ROGERS's property necessary to prepare the Boundary line adjustment document, and survey which is necessary to construct the joint use access. ROGERS to pay for survey necessary for building construction. Side Sewer BRETZKE to pay for the installation of side sewers or sewer main as required by the City of Renton, and to connect the existing ROGER'S house to sewer and remove the existing septic system. ROGERS to pay costs associated with connecting the future houses to the sewer stub outs provided at the two new lots. Water Service BRETZKE to pay for the installation of water service lines along joint use access easement from street right of way to future new lots, and payment for the installation of water meters on frontage of NE 14t' Street. ROGERS to pay for costs associated with connecting future lots and future houses. . Storm water and construction of access road BRETZKE to pay for the engineering design and construction of storm drainage system and joint use access road, to meet the approval of City of Renton for private access. Bretzke will pay for the installation of frontage improvements as follows, curb gutter sidewalk, additional street paving and storm water system, as required by the City of Renton for both Rogers and Bretzke Short plats Bretzke will pay for the installation of a retaining wall along side the joint use driveway as needed to construct the road way. ROGERS to pay any storm water fees required for construction of new houses or creation of lot in a short plat. Fencing Bretzke will pay for fencing on the west side of the property, equal to a 5 feet high cedar fence. Electrical BRETZKE will pay for the design and installation of an underground electrical services or main extension, which will accommodate ROGER'S two future lots. ROGERS to pay any cost associated with connecting future lots or houses to PSE point of connection. Cable and Telephone BRETZKE will pay for installation of cable and telephone conduits to be installed across NE 10th street and in access road, to be able serve two future lots. ROGERS to pay for any costs associated with connecting future lots or houses to system. Gas BRETZKE will pay for Installation of gas line to serve two future lots. Other Permits, Fees or Mitigation Payments Construction permit fees and inspection fees for items being constructed by BRETZKE will be paid by BRETZKE. Any other permit fees, licenses, mitigation fees, construction fees, design fees are to be paid by ROGERS. Cost Sharing and Allocation of Costs In order to achieve cost economy BRETZKE and ROGERS can allocate costs of professional and construction services based upon their mutual agreement. Completion Dates It is recognized that time is of the essences of this contract, and both parties will work to move the project forward. The following completion dates are mutually agreed upon to show performance of contract Hiring of surveyor and engineering. Professional services contracts to be signed within two weeks of receipts, billings to be paid promptly within time frames allowed by professional services contracts. Submittal of lot line and Subdivision applications within one week of receipt of all documentations. Submittal of Lot line adjustment should be no later than June 30 2006 Submittal of Short plat shall bee no later than September 30 2006. Final engineering plans to be submitted no later than December 12006 All road construction complete by May 1 ?007. Final Short plats to be submitted no later than June 1 2007. In witness whereof, the parties have executed this Agreement at Renton, Washington, the day and year first above written. Daniel Bretzke Fumiko Bretzke Larry STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) Ss. COUNTY OF KING) Date 4' 1 2 5 { 4.6 Date +r zs--/0 Date L .� I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Daniel Bretzke and Fumiko Bretzke and Larry Rogers are the persons who appeared before me, and said persons acknowledged tha te signed this instrument, and acknowledged it as `6e and voluntary act for th he and purposes mentioned in the instrument..r r h SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this ,? 5- day of r; / , 2006. H l Iv Ci NN 0 Vol 0TARY • ti�� • AUG 26, 2007 ; Z �{ . i i9�• •pUBLZG : �Qi `il Ws r Property Legal Description Attachment A Bretzke parcels The following parcels 102305 358 W 100 FT OF E 430 FT OF E 1/2 OF S 10 AC OF N 50 AC OF E 1/2 OF NE 114 LESS N 30 FT and 102305 359 W 100 FT OF E 530 FT OF E 1/2 OF S 10 AC OF N 50 AC OF E 1/2 OF NE 1/4 LESS N 30 FT And 102305 360 E 1/2 OF S 10 AC OF N 50 AC OF E 1/2 OF NE 1/4 LESS E 530 FT LESS N30FT DEVELOPOF REtTONp� ENG JUL 12 2006 RECEIVED The`J4Si 170 _1 eet or, south 10 a es 6f Northe"t arter W.M. in` -.A .Tou EXCEPT th: th. feet thereof; au�d EXCEPT that poli 10 acres. CLTIC NO.: H759997 Y. EXHIBIT "A-1* thb-14gast A3�6.feet of the Fast half of the Zhe-_.*q�rth .51i iim4ts of the East half of the Township 23 North, Range 5 East, of. -� t . Wastdnikpri:-' 12r f e*t Qf, th%. North ISO feet of the East 70 CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Printed: 07-12-2006 NLANNING Land Use Actions RECEIPT Jt ' 2 2006 14L 'QED Permit#: LUA06-088 Payment Made: 07/12/2006 12:26 PM Receipt Number: R0603493 Total Payment: 450.00 Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Payee: DANIEL & FUMIKO BRETZKE Trans Account Code Description Amount ------ 5015 ------------------ 000.345.81.00.0012 ------------------------------- Lot Line Adjustment ---------------- 450.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount ---------- -------- --------------------------- Payment Check 3184 --------------- 450.00 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due ------ 3021 ------------------ 303.000.00.345.85 ------------------------------- Park Mitigation Fee --------------- .00 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees .00 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers .00 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat .00 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees .00 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review .00 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat .00 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat .00 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD .00 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees .00 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment .00 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks .00 501.7 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone .00 5016 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt .00 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev .00 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval .00 5021 000.345.81..00.0018 Temp Use or Fence Review .00 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees .00 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee .00 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend .00 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies .00 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) .00 5954 604.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits .00 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage .00 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax .00 Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON JUL 12 2006 � �^ BRET&E LOT UWADASWENTSMPLAN O0 NE i/a OF THE 5E 1/A OF SFC. 1O, TWP. 23N,. PGE. SE.. W.M. r `:. o'" r�r f,. eM e• or a ea. 1 r .Mr rw....• �r Iry e . ���+�^ro+ . CITY OF PENTON. RING CO1NFY, WA3 W. , NOT r�r K WIT mr — T !M •fir ra i�mr ean. ralo .eeWo 4m rA .ee, r ase rs�wrc swrr saw rnaa. rr w, Masao nr no era a "I.—al mw wW rar' 4r wrrlK kn�r af.. Y•n e.reM uer w:r :� •a,rrls :rM1r. rM �.r.rmr r'"••�:'', ti . Vr'Sr r•[r�MrY 11 .rl/! Y M Wr r rrrerri� .4ir rn r.r msvr o . r a�rWtp t � Irma rM� •p br frlq ttaart u[� r•tyya�y�a ••�� IeCaa gflriMre .lr a�rriaenr'�r M1ll-rerAa Mrrae i ! \ ♦" K %�; °rte I a f P(� � __�l �rwC�r� l •�� – � � a.7�s rl r d e, 9 � a ♦ e- ' Ac � ° p � 7!l7P.R7s� a•Isln r Y F �\ � . �a+N Rr"• ra •Ir �� '� • •Nr.r�wre�r•r Mir R Y Y " "'..free• S �! �`n lO*ID .-i $ F V �/ \ __moi _ -'� -- •r-----�..r � . r._s •�.: '"'-- T� ��.r�— .u� RILL •:�;:.ox•r r. rar. an.+FARM A KI �• \\ •tel `� 'x .©irr EI.rwiu Y9eNT$®Y� , � '+ +f.we•-,.,,ricer Q l,•� � n-•p� _ ro Y ANLL l .}%m Mor 4-% F �n % alrllar�rM Nf 4p faeV� �r R wri +oma k .s \ il,. r*.. \ a ` •na �r r/" .� aW # r. k •i PI I I erarl ` ep - - - - - ' - �\ •` Q ; •a, . r. ran ' .. � e�iPo . t9,lP!l�dP.+ �_� .,. ± # � .�.e.r "rvr'rnn or g Y r •� � YI �'~ h ' Y "r _ � •„ 6 F $ n I e 10FINQWAYPIACE9E " r° 9V0QU4tAlEr WA. 9 W6 FAX MW 6W29M — TIr• pS'JO'949a0 ■fC .s* n r awm YAIlICi4LM �rrzo°.-w-.e.rr 01'"+ aulAVImmsr. am cer lG 1G A19bOMM. a TNF mmsr. 6AP� AIE IOIH!► ai u:r o. rar.nw rwo+arwrr- �.rw,a�.i�ai�: � €r•.^'�'rriirera ABMTl71I,WA. MW A�RgM�(.Wil S�0 nr•wa. w rm�[o of. • erz oz- drr.. r, o �. x. v. rr a-friva .ice w. eon-errt DEVELOPMENT PLANNING /��.,. gni / /, i / �. tl \t4 t1 W r, ... w w a ... W w '. w •- w I 1 I CITY OF R ENTON JUL 12 2P06 ■■■ 1 f� RECEIV 3 I 1 4\ �^--t_ Yl Il `IUM IPtATTEG', w/�% 1 ! �' 'jr � r/'' 1e , W l� W W � W W w ' w W i w �Y r 4♦ �_.' l Jf i � ; S I f e 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 I r`�flsr- w J i _-.. �. ! ,,y/ w r''+ Y Y +f a. .r. .✓ `\. 4l1 I T 5� I f J l 15 k 1 1 JW CE i 1/4, WJWL, N l/4i J I t w , w W l I ���ryf ���/ �Iy �!'�j� ♦ } /�[�'• ;I VW/�/ A �1/ W rl w w w *rJ W W W W f ,Y 4 ��l y� i • � Y W ♦ f Y � - '.... y `� ��^1 1 —t I`r.�R✓/I11/t 7 rrl./'1 Iii FTyTI !W '4� WI i_ 1 fr.�f1H PaRp'ST ww 1!t � I i VS ,G ♦ j w w r v w W w W �'�Yr � Y 'r �rY~ � »G w- i V .i-� - +W~ __ +I' w ''' 1 I! � i � I �r r� `/ I .¢'w �- W J w __ t..-�.^'�w W w w �r''ar • �r� j �lr i I i i! j �I �� ' i 14 �iR `Iy��l I i 11 *4 i \` \`� `il i w T W /w_"�4 w w _.4 r�rW ji'i �I'~ A' I y.' — w .�.� r,� ra. W W" •+. I I' f I I 1 - ^J � l I t. 1 - , i.' I--•_.___� �"- ____M1 � �I �r�. � /.may r J r�� J . 1. 11 1 i I i t Y � W >._'w w ~'Y w W fl r�6 /'y .��- i moi// m w __- i W w- -G-. _- _�___^'',I ' /! r• rr•J I I I I I 1 'I i r"r y�}"°ti .� +yJ W w r•r'�7�' ,' r'r'�/ w ,� w Jr i 1it+f Ilij i I \ 'Ik5 ',1 II11 !IiII 1i � rr.'-'W•r J'*µ`�W `�i+ ww. ww iw wi wW ` iw 1,jr �w a•�Ir w}r w w ! yw 'W7i�l!W,yr /rf,f w ,,d� lw /W J! Jr!i ;r�r_•I..,�_T...-_--'_--''J•4._.�-:r.;�_',P-_--_.�---N-r-r^-�_-_.}-_^---^�-`-_-jr ar ♦'/ ' /♦rir�'yi .j''�J/,r yr^/�-��.��-�'.� �-r -mof 1 r. of al j ! f k Il 1 i ,w w w W i W~ rl/ ♦"! J/W /!W '1. +:1~y '`� _J+; !'!, 111 ..`_' � �Y .�-r�I I1,. --------- _i I� , 1 \ �` / w I " _ .. ♦ _�y-.. r.-�-=-'_....-_� v.. -.,—.ter✓ _ .-JAG NTL � JI - -- SIM I \ 11 11\ '' ` r _.� I _ r'`.r/ N'r'�''..r'� ^.-"•'_ !� �` --- „_ _.� 5t ik l SI I iy w Y W � J f I' � ` �'� ,/i•' �,. ` �l f J `r' A �. ' �:"°" ••�I J �4E6�' I ! 1 f 1 1 f , „r •� / � III rn �.-J-��+'^�.��}�_/�/� j I _ _l -- ' Y- •I 5'S 5i 1y 1 k�� ..� + 1 I .r..i �• �frr � J � y \, w " f+ I iY +i r I !f f ! ! ! { V � I �fxn rj+r: ` 1L r—' ♦ __ ___-___--- ..a7 f !�j � fl Ir 1 5 ..�. r i 7 J •f ,� I + ! 1 i II T I ! rr 14, II �. 112J� ! t I c.:.1Y_� _ y. -... y w� + l f 1 I 1 �, I � I � I 1 / If i Rl 1 5' �f^~ _ � O .� '.y..- I•` YY / �f r W w W ` w- y / 1 •• f J I} I I r l R 1 I r T• i1 I / - I}� � ff i ` `,I . r ,. w W Y+ r .r, !f I i� i J I } '♦ l I' / 7 1 4 4 1 1 I / yr * 1� w r� a �@• w w W Jrr f i 1 I I ! [ t ! 1 ! 1 ♦1 151 ' I \.f �f + 1 i w�W r `♦ ' �PnEIM~IIA � 4 I s' 5+J t� `" i� ' 1 + rw i r �'ri J! J 4'•t I !! ! ! r f j /J /i ,�`f ---.... __.�. � ..I ± iy —.��. _J r� I J r'O^w.-w. � w_ W .�' r r i W w w i � W N r `•..... / /% fC/J !' ' 1 Jrf r / "/ /' l�---r'JJ'�F/'� II} JIL f r'I ' ✓ � JJ �. f' Pump 1 \ r - T / / ! / T1[ iK /YQ', 7HE 1 • ' T,''�'' l • / ,r Jr � / / 1 _ --F.� �_ _ __ _ ,ter-.�_ _ ��_,�_ r"^ � ~.�-.^��Y -_ ^''_ l � I I f / / '� I WV + r r„ �` tiw 111 /rte ' ;` /jai` r r} / rf � ! - / JJ / � / ' ♦I� �' J' ..---- - -��__ •�—'_•� J i r f 155 J' s -f{ r" s Vi f•,1,� .. ! �r 1' • .'f . P'. f I-. �.._ - -; --fix SPACEI 'rRa r aS 1 0 CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LUA NO. LUALLA LND NO. wD'3&W18 DECLARATION KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE THE UNDERSIGNED OWNER (S) OF THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED DO HEREBY MAKE A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT THEREOF PURSUANT TO PCW 58.17.040 AND DECLARE THIS ADJUSTMENT TO BE THE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF THE SAME, AND THAT SAID ADJUSTMENT IS MADE WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE .WITH THE DESIRES OF THE OWNER (S) . IN WITNESS WHEREOF WE HAVE SET OUR HANDS AND SEALS. DANIEV P. PETZKE FUMIKO K. BRE ZKE LARRY W. 140GERS Name . SATE OF WAS !iNG!DiY `/S COUNTY OF KING I CERTIFY THAT I KNEW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THAT DANIEL P. BRETZKE AND FUMIKO K. BPETZKE SIGNED THIS INSTRUMENT ON OATH STATED THAT HE AND SHE IS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT OF SUCH ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES MENTIONED IN THIS INSTRUMLNT. DA TED THIS 1 DAY OF 2007, PRINTED NAME ?" kA e m NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOA THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RESIDING A T vx�"ul.-3 ` MY COMMISSION EXPIRES W mi l" -tu . 1664'1 Notary Public State of Washington PHILIP KAO MY ppolntment Expires Apr pr 20, 2009 3 C WORKSoe 4h, KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS 2(jk AY 02007' KING COUNTY ASSESSOR DEPUTY KING COUNTY ASSESSOR TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL N0. 102305-9359 TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL N0. 902305-9358 TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL N0. 102305-9357 TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL N0. 102305-9360 RECORDING NO. FILED FG CONFORMED COPY IN BOOK EDWIN J. 20070222900002 CITY OF RENTON SLAM 105.00 MANAGER 02/2202001 08?44 KING COUNTY, WA NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RESIDING A T Ve o,.� MY COMMISSION EXPIRES &011,16,.- ?,b. 2-66,0i BRE7ZKE7-ROGERS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION'S PARCEL A: TAX PARCEL NO. 102305-9360. THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH 10 ACRES OF THE NORTH 50 ACRES OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST 530 FEET; AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET. PARC>fL B. TAX PARCEL N0. 102305-9359. THE WEST 100 FEET OF THE EAST 530 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH 10 ACRES OF THE NORTH 50 ACRES OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NOR THEA S T QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EA S T, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHING TON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET. PARCEL C: TAX PARCEL N0. 102305--9358. THE WEST 100 FEET OF THE EAST 430 FEET OF TN'_ EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH 10 ACRES OF THE NORTH 50 ACRES OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET. PARCEL D TAX PARCEL NO. 102305-9357, THE WEST 170 FEET OF THE EAST 310 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH 10 ACRES OF THE NORTH 50 ACRES OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NDR THS: A S T QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23, NORTH, RANGE 5 EA S T, W.M. , IN ICING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 120 FEET OF THE NORTH 150 FE E T OF THE EAST 70 FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE NORTH 30 FEET OF SAID SOUTH 10 ACRES. NaTL=: FOUND NO EVIDENCE OF EASEMENTS, COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS OF RECORD AFFECTING SUBJECT PROPERTY. STATE OF WA SHING TDN VS COUNTY OF KING I CERTIFY THAT I KNEW DR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE 1 HA T LARRY W. ROGERS SIGNED THIS INSTRUMENT ON OATH STATED THAT HE AND 5'1 -IE- IS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT OF SUCH ACT FDR THE USES AND PURPOSES MENTIONED IN THIS INSTRUMENT. DATED THIS 1 tam DAY OF 2007. PRINTED NAME P44 t►t..f 140tu APPROVALS:APPROVED THIS DAY OF t'_e-60u��_,20* 0------------------ 7. CITY OF RENTON ADMINSTRATOR-PLANNING/ BUILDING/PUBLI all LV THIS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR Notary Public State of Washington PHILIP KAO ':tti Ap intment Expires Apr 20, 2009 LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICA RFe0"_"ni?0F__L?'S rFI?TIFICATF UNDER MY SUPERVISION IN CONFORMANCE WITH STATE AND COUNTY STATUTES OF IN 2007. — EDWIN EN JR. CERTIFICATE N0. 15025 DATE RECORDING IVO. I VOL./PAGE METHOD OF SURVEY." DECLARATION OF COVENANT: INSTRUMENTATION FOR THIS SURVEY WAS A 1 " GEODIMETER 600 ELECTRONIC DISTANCE MEASURING UNIT. PROCEDURES USED IN THIS SURVEY WERE DIRECT AND REVERSE ANGLES, NO CORRECTION NECESSARY, MEETS CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY AND STATE vrCrNrrY MAP T. ru LU U,�._-o 0 CO STAT ROUTE 900 LQ 0 c 0 e 0 2Lo a 3: Eli S A3 ,�r 0 CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LUA NO. LUALLA LND NO. wD'3&W18 DECLARATION KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE THE UNDERSIGNED OWNER (S) OF THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED DO HEREBY MAKE A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT THEREOF PURSUANT TO PCW 58.17.040 AND DECLARE THIS ADJUSTMENT TO BE THE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF THE SAME, AND THAT SAID ADJUSTMENT IS MADE WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE .WITH THE DESIRES OF THE OWNER (S) . IN WITNESS WHEREOF WE HAVE SET OUR HANDS AND SEALS. DANIEV P. PETZKE FUMIKO K. BRE ZKE LARRY W. 140GERS Name . SATE OF WAS !iNG!DiY `/S COUNTY OF KING I CERTIFY THAT I KNEW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THAT DANIEL P. BRETZKE AND FUMIKO K. BPETZKE SIGNED THIS INSTRUMENT ON OATH STATED THAT HE AND SHE IS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT OF SUCH ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES MENTIONED IN THIS INSTRUMLNT. DA TED THIS 1 DAY OF 2007, PRINTED NAME ?" kA e m NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOA THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RESIDING A T vx�"ul.-3 ` MY COMMISSION EXPIRES W mi l" -tu . 1664'1 Notary Public State of Washington PHILIP KAO MY ppolntment Expires Apr pr 20, 2009 3 C WORKSoe 4h, KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS 2(jk AY 02007' KING COUNTY ASSESSOR DEPUTY KING COUNTY ASSESSOR TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL N0. 102305-9359 TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL N0. 902305-9358 TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL N0. 102305-9357 TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL N0. 102305-9360 RECORDING NO. FILED FG CONFORMED COPY IN BOOK EDWIN J. 20070222900002 CITY OF RENTON SLAM 105.00 MANAGER 02/2202001 08?44 KING COUNTY, WA NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RESIDING A T Ve o,.� MY COMMISSION EXPIRES &011,16,.- ?,b. 2-66,0i BRE7ZKE7-ROGERS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION'S PARCEL A: TAX PARCEL NO. 102305-9360. THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH 10 ACRES OF THE NORTH 50 ACRES OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST 530 FEET; AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET. PARC>fL B. TAX PARCEL N0. 102305-9359. THE WEST 100 FEET OF THE EAST 530 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH 10 ACRES OF THE NORTH 50 ACRES OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NOR THEA S T QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EA S T, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHING TON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET. PARCEL C: TAX PARCEL N0. 102305--9358. THE WEST 100 FEET OF THE EAST 430 FEET OF TN'_ EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH 10 ACRES OF THE NORTH 50 ACRES OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET. PARCEL D TAX PARCEL NO. 102305-9357, THE WEST 170 FEET OF THE EAST 310 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH 10 ACRES OF THE NORTH 50 ACRES OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NDR THS: A S T QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23, NORTH, RANGE 5 EA S T, W.M. , IN ICING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 120 FEET OF THE NORTH 150 FE E T OF THE EAST 70 FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE NORTH 30 FEET OF SAID SOUTH 10 ACRES. NaTL=: FOUND NO EVIDENCE OF EASEMENTS, COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS OF RECORD AFFECTING SUBJECT PROPERTY. STATE OF WA SHING TDN VS COUNTY OF KING I CERTIFY THAT I KNEW DR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE 1 HA T LARRY W. ROGERS SIGNED THIS INSTRUMENT ON OATH STATED THAT HE AND 5'1 -IE- IS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT OF SUCH ACT FDR THE USES AND PURPOSES MENTIONED IN THIS INSTRUMENT. DATED THIS 1 tam DAY OF 2007. PRINTED NAME P44 t►t..f 140tu APPROVALS:APPROVED THIS DAY OF t'_e-60u��_,20* 0------------------ 7. CITY OF RENTON ADMINSTRATOR-PLANNING/ BUILDING/PUBLI all LV THIS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR Notary Public State of Washington PHILIP KAO ':tti Ap intment Expires Apr 20, 2009 LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICA RFe0"_"ni?0F__L?'S rFI?TIFICATF UNDER MY SUPERVISION IN CONFORMANCE WITH STATE AND COUNTY STATUTES OF IN 2007. — EDWIN EN JR. CERTIFICATE N0. 15025 DATE RECORDING IVO. I VOL./PAGE METHOD OF SURVEY." DECLARATION OF COVENANT: INSTRUMENTATION FOR THIS SURVEY WAS A 1 " GEODIMETER 600 ELECTRONIC DISTANCE MEASURING UNIT. PROCEDURES USED IN THIS SURVEY WERE DIRECT AND REVERSE ANGLES, NO CORRECTION NECESSARY, MEETS CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY AND STATE vrCrNrrY MAP NOT TO SCALE LU STAT ROUTE 900 w 0 a Z w SITE w cn Q z w > J a J a z > o D H Q OF WASHINGTON STANDARDS SET BY WAC 332-130-1001. RGE. 5E., W. M. THE OWNERS OF THE LAND EMBRACED WITHIN THIS L 0 T LINE ADJUSTMENT, IN RETURN FDR THE BENEFIT TO ACCRUE FROM THIS SUBDIVISION, BY SIGNING HEREON COVENANT AND AGREE TO CONVEY THE BENEFICIAL .INTEREST IN THE NEW EASEMENT SHOWN ON THIS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT TO ANY AN ALL FUTURE PURCHASERS OF THE LOTS, OR OF ANY SUBDIVISION THEREOF. THIS COVENANT SHALL RUN WITH THE LAND AS SHOWN ON THIS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT. PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS &UTILITIES NEW PRIVATE EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR .INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES, IS SHOWN ON THE FACE OF THIS L 0 T LINE ADJUSTMENT. THE OWNERS AND THEIR SUCCESSORS OF -OTS C AND D SHALL HAVE AN EQUAL AND UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE OWNERSHIP AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITY A SEMEN T AND APPURTENANCES. THESE APPURTENANCES AND MAINTENANCE 3ESPDNSIBILITIES INCLUDE THE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD, ?RAINAGE PIPES, AND STORM WATER DUALITY AND CONVEYANCE FACILITIES LOCATED II THIN THIS EASEMENT, PRIVATE SIGNAGE, AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE NOT OWNED BY HE CITY OF PENTON DR OTHER UTILITY PROVIDERS. MAINTENANCE COSTS SHALL BE SHARED EQUALLY. PARKING ON THE PAVING IN THE ACCESS EASEMENT IS PROHIBITED, lNLESS PAVEMENT WIDTH IS GREATER THAN 20 FEET. NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT: THE NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT (NGPE) AS SHOWN ON THE FACE OF THIS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT IDENTIFIES THE WETLAND AND ASSOCIATED BUFFER AS MODIFIED WITH BUFFER AVERAGING AS SHOWN. THE CASA T I DN OF THE NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT (NGPE) CONVEYS TO THE PUBLIC A BENEFICIAL INTEREST IN THE LAND WITHIN THE EASEMENT AREA. THIS INTEREST SHALL BE FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRESERVING NATIVE VEGETATION FDR THE CONTROL OF SURFACE WATER AND EROSION, ?A Ir'�lTEl�'.��`:CE OF SLOPE S TARILi TY, VIS�.'AL ANDiYA TUr'�AL BUFFEP.I1`JG, AND `�' �' P ►'� Pn .�� TQC Ti 0N OF PLANT AND ANIMAL HABITATS. THE NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT IMPOSES UPON ALL PRESENT AND FUTURE OWNERS AND OCCUPIERS OF THE EASEMENT AREA ENFORCEABLE ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC BY THE 'ICITY OF RENTON, TO LEAVE UNDISTURBED ALL TREES AND OTHER VEGETATION WITHIN THE ,EASEMENT AREA. THE VEGETATION WITHIN THE NGPE MAY NOT BE CUT, PRUNED, COVERED 'WITH FILL, REMOVED OR DAMAGED WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE CITY OF RENTON. THE RIGHT TO ENTRY GRANTED HEREIN 5�ALL APPLY TO THE AGENTS, R,EPRESEN TA TI VES AND EMPL 0 PEES OF THE OWNERS OR SUBSEQUENT OWNERS OF THE UNDERLYING PROPERTY. of WA Li �. 9 0 qL LAND� EXPIRES /I nsions 6210 FAIRWAY PLACE S.E. SNOQUALMIE, WA, 98065 PHONE (425) 456-4488 BR ROGERS BRFTZCF PROPERTY LARRY RaGERS 5521 NE 70TH 57r 5603 NF 10THPcwnONOF ST RENTQN,1 NA. 98x59 RENTON, WA. 98059 SE 114 OF NE 1 /4 , S. --!Q- T. _ 23N R. -.5E D WN. BY DATE JOB NO. REVISION D. A. N. 12-14-06 5042-BLA 10-05--2006 CHKD. BY SCALE SHEET K. B. G. 1 "=40 ' 1 OF 2 5ET 3/8" BAR f GAP "6E00 LS# 15025" "TYPICAL" �Q J OF N 1/4, WETLAND NOTES: 1� THE WETLAND FLAGS AND SOIL LOG PITS SHOWN ON THE MAP PAGE WERE DERIVED BY BERGER/ABAM ENGINEERS, INC. ON FEBRUARY 17, 2006 . GEOD.IMENSIONS, INC. LOCATED THESE FLAGS ON MARCH 2, 2006. THE WETLAND FLAGS SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE MARKED AS FOUND IN FIELD. 588'16'10"E J WETLAND BUFER A AREA TABLE UNE BEARING = 5, 748 SO. FT. DWA VCE Ll N55 °28 ' 30 "W AREA 5.63' L2 S15 010'19"E AREA = 16,669 SO . FT . +/- 24.69' L3 S09 025'03 "E 5603 24.99 ' L4 N34 046'14 " W 38.28' L5 S59 044 '05 "E 25.12' L6 S20 '44 ' 08 "E 91041'08" 17.82' L7 N29 '03 ' 44 "W 88098'52" 36.32' L8 N32 °46 '25 "W 10 47.41' L9 S51 002'54"E 53.77' L 10 S44 051 '02 "E 70.99' L11 S72"17'41"E 28.34' L121 S87 '38 ' 14 "E 32.09' L131 S46 -43'3J 1. El 36.91' 588'16'10"E J WETLAND BUFER A AREA TABLE LOT. A } "BUFFER " AREA = 5, 748 SO. FT. LOT B L 0 T B "BUFFER" AREA = 402 SCS. FT. +I - L 0 T C "BUFFER" AREA = 16,669 SO . FT . +/- LRT D "BUFFER" AREA = 815 SQ. FT. +/- BRE7ZKEwROGERS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT SE 114 OF THE NE 114 OF SEC. 10, TWP . 23N . , PGE. 5E . , W. M. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUMY WASHINGTON GRAPHIC SCALE olumm 0 40 80 120 N.E. 10TH STREET "PUBLIC ROADWAY" BEARING MERIDIAN: A BEARING OF N00 002'42"E ALONG THE EAST SECTION LINE NORTH LINE GF BETWEEN THE NE SEC. CORNER AND THE E. 114 CORNER OF SEC. 10-23-05 SECTION 10--23-051, PER KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NO. L 02SO016, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 172 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 205, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. S68 ' 166 ' 10 "E 661.78' CALC ' 431. 69' A nn n . S88'20'02"E 501.84` CITY OF RENTON LUA-05-108—LLA LEGEND FOR MAP PAGE -1!�- FOUND MONUMENT ON 03/02/2006 AS NOTED 0 FOUND REBAR AS NOTED SET 3/8" BAR & CAP "GEOD LS # 15025" CEN TERL .SNE OF ROAD PROPERTY LINES TO BE MOVE- NEW OVNEW PROPERTY LINE ® WETLAND FLAG "MARKED AS FOUND IN FIELD " - — --- — — --- �- — EDGE OF WETLANDS — — — — — — WE TL A ND B UFFER ED GE 7 5ET 3/8" BAR $ GAP "GE'09 L5# 15025" "TYPICAL" CITY D1= RENTON POINT IVO. 1845 03/02/2006 FOUND 4" CONC MONUMENT WITH 112" COPPER PIN. -' -' DOWN 1.5 ' IN CASE N.E. SEC . CORNER OF SEC. 10-23-5 Sf1E BENCH MAW 'CATCH BASIN R -O -W RIM ELEV . =469.24' 588.16 ' 10 " E _ -- -- NOTE. 1 clu°1 FOUND 110 ENCROACHMENTS PERTAINING TO SUBJECT PROPERTY. S88'16' 10"E 70.03' ADDPESS LOT A 5501 NE 10TH ST LOT B 5515 NE 10TH ST LOT C 5521 NE 10TH ST LOT D 5603 NE 10TH ST CITY OF RENTON BEARING BENCH MARK NO. REM 101 03/02/2006 10 11 FOUND 2" DIA. CON C S00002'42"W 104.78' MONUMENT WITH COPPER PI 55.76' DOWN 1.6' IN CASE SOO'02'42"W 20.01' ELEV . ON TACK = 512.02' N88"16'10"W E. 1/4 CORNER w Q N00 *02'44"E OF SEC. 10-23-5 h N00 '02-42"El 103.318 LINE ARC RADIUS rz C1 40.01' �to 25.00' 91041'08" C21 38.53' om zED 88098'52" N 10 11 14 LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 S88'16'10"E 26.01' L2 S00002'42"W 104.78' L3 S88*16'10"E 55.76' L4 SOO'02'42"W 20.01' L5 N88"16'10"W 140.03' L6 N00 *02'44"E 20.01' L7 N00 '02-42"El 103.318 LINE ARC RADIUS DELTA C1 40.01' 25.00' 91041'08" C21 38.53' 25.00' 88098'52" CITY OF )&WON C.++ XVIRX POW NO. 1852 03/02/2006 FOUND 3" SURFACE BRASS DISC WITH PUNCH MARK SE SEC. CORNER OF SEC. 10-23-5 VERTICAL DATUM: (VISITED 03-02-2006) CITY OF RENTON BENCH MARK NO. RE -AV 101 (NA VD 19B8) "SEE MAP FOR DETAILED INFORMA TION " ELEVATION ON COPPER PIN = 512.02' REFERENCES USED: CITY OF RENTON LUA-05— 108—LLA, V. 197, PAGE 067, KC RECORDS KING COUNTY BL A NO. L 02SO016, V. 175, PAGES 205 AND 206, KC RECORDS RECORD OF SURVEY, V. 152, PAGE 83, KC RECORDS. CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LUA NU. LUA16,0111-L A LND NO. wD-� 18 DECLARATION KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS) OF THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED DO HEREBY MAKE A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT THEREOF PURSUANT TO PCW 58.17.040 AND DECLARE THIS ADJUSTMENT TO BE THE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF THE SAME, AND THAT SAID ADJUSTMENT IS MADE WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRES OF THE OWNER(S). IN WITNESS WHEREOF WE HAVE SET OUR HANDS AND SEALS. P k, DANT BP ETZKE FUMIKO K. BRETZ ARRY W. ROGERS Name STATE OF WASHINGTON � VS COUNTY OF KING I CERTIFY THAT I KNEW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THAT DANIEL P. BRETZKE AND FUMIKO K. BRETZKE SIGNED THIS INSTRUMENT ON OATH STATED THAT HE AND SHE IS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE INSTRUhIENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTAI7Y ACT OF SUCH ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSE", MENTIONED IN THIS INSTRUMENT. DATED THIS Torr' DAY OF Ftbt- "04" 2007. PRINTED NAME / pm I L4 n "Ab re- Atm NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RESIDING A T _ gle l rr,%. j MY COMMISSION EX(AIRES 02w 20, Z669 hloturY Public State Of Washington PHILIP KAO ki., Ap Intment ExPl(es Apr 20, 2009 APPROVALS: APPROVED THIS _ZO DAY OF _<l�vKu✓_ 2007. CITY OF RENTON Al)'OINSTRA TOR -PLANNING/ BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS _OAy OF 2007 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO TAX ACCOUNT PARCFL NO TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO DEPUTY KING COUNTY ASSESSOR 102305-9359 102305-9358 102305-9357 102305-9360 NO. RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD THIS — DA Y OF 2007 IN BOOK OF AT PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF EDWIN J. GREEN JR.. MANAGER S R BRETZKE-ROGERS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 10, TWP. 23N., PGE. 5E., W.M. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION'S CITY OF PENTON, KING COUNTY, WA. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY WASHINGTON PARCELA: TAX PARCEL NO. 102305-9360, THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH 10 ACRES OF THE NORTH 50 ACRES OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST 530 FEET; AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET. PARCEL B: TAX PARCEL NO. 102305-9359. THE WEST 100 FEET OF THE EAST 530 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH 10 ACRES OF THE NORTH 50 ACRES OF THE I -AST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET. PARCEL C: TAX PARCEL NO. 102305-9358. THE WEST 100 FEET OF THE EAST 430 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH 10 ACRES OF THE NORTH 50 ACRES OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHING7-ON, EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET. PARCEL D TAX PARCEL NO. 102305-9357. I METHOD OF SURVEY: c RECORDING NO. INSTRUMENTATION FOR THIS SURVEY WAS A 1" GEOOIMETER 600 ELECTURES USED IN THIS SURVEY W WERE ONIC DISTANCE AND REVERSE ANGLES, R NO DCORRECTION NECESSARY, MEETS CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY AND STATE OF WASHINGTON STANDARDS SET BY WAC 332-130-100. VOL./PAGE THE WEST .170 FEET OF THE EAST 310 FEET OF DECLARATION OF COVENANT: THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH 10 ACRES OF THE THE OWNERS OF THE LAND EMBRACED WITHIN THIS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, NORTH 50 ACRES OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST IN RETURN FOR THE BENEFIT TO ACCRUE FROM THIS SUBDIVISION, QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23, NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, BY SIGNING HEREON COVENANT AND AGREE TO CONVEY THE BENEFICIAL INTEREST W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; IN THE NEW EASEMENT SHOWN ON THIS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT TO ANY AN ALL EXCEPT THE: SOUTH 120 FEET OF THE NORTH 150 FEF..T OF FUTURE PURCHASERS OF THE LOTS, OR OF ANY SUBDIVISION THEREOF. THE EAST 70 FEET THEREOF; AND THIS COVENANT SHALL RUN WITH THE LAND AS SHOWN ON THIS LOT LINE AD„USTMENT. EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE NORTH 30 FLET OF SAID SOUTH 10 ACRES. NOTE. FOUND NO EVIDENCE OF EASEMENTS, COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS OF RECORD AFFECTING SUBJECT PROPERTY. STATE OF WASHINGTON VS ” COUNTY OF KING I'',.CERTIFY THAT I KNEW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE T;-b-ITI LARRY W. ROGERS SIGNED THIS INSTRUMENT ON OATH STATED THAT HE AND SHE IS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT OF SUCH ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES MENTIONED IN THIS INSTRUMENT. DATED THIS II&PH DAY OF pd6mA,"rut 2007. PRINTED NAME %+fL-bs {Grab NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RESIDING AT aelliTolli MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Aoft«. 2-6,206-11 otary Public Sta;PHILIP f Washingtph KAO ADPolnt1 Expires Apr 20, 2009 LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICA 111 ryAL LAN EXPIRES /l. PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS; EGRESS & UTILITIES: NEW PRIVATE EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES, IS SHOWN ON THE FACE OF THIS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT. THE OWNERS AND THEIR SUCCESSORS OF LOTS C AND D SHALL NAVE AN EQUAL AND UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE OWNERSHIP AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF -THE' -'PRIVATE INGRESS,.-.EGPESS' 'dD UTILITY EASE/dENT AND APPURTEp�gArE.`r. 'THESE .APPURTE.NANCES AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE TOE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE I�CCESS ROAD, DRAINAGE PIPES, AND STORM WATER QUALITY AND CONVEYANCE FACILITIES LL'CATED WITHIN THIS EASEMENT, PRIVATE SIGNAGE, AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE NOT OWNED BY THE CITY OF PENTON OR OTHER UTILITY PROVIDERS. MAINTENANCE COSTS SHALL.BE SHARED EQUALLY. PARKING ON THE PAVING IN THE ACCESS EASEMENT IS PROHIBITED, UNLESS PAVEMENT WIDTH IS GREATER THAN 20 FEET. NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT: THE NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT (NGPE) AS SHOWN ON THE FACE OF THIS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT IDENTIFIES THE WETLAND AND ASSOCIATED BUFFER AS MODIFIED WITH BUFFER AVERAGING AS SHOWN. THE CPEA.TION OF THE NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT (NGPE) CONVEYS TO THE PUBLIC A BENEFICIAL INTEREST IN THE LAND WITHIN THE EASEMENT AREA. THIS INTEREST SHALL BE FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRESERVING NATIVE VEGETATION FOR THE CONTROL' OF SURFACE WATER AND EROSION, MAINTENANCE OF SLOPE STABILITY, VISUAL AND NATURAL BUFFERING, AND PROTECTION OF PLANT AND ANIMAL HABITATS. THE NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT IMPOSES UPON ALL PRESENT AND FUTURE OWNERS AND OCCUPIERS OF THE EASEMENT AREA ENFORCEABLE ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC BY THE CITY OF PENTON, TO LEAVE UNDISTURBED ALL TREES AND OTHER VEGETATION WITHIN THE EASEMENT AREA, THE VEGETATION WITHIN THE NGPE MAY NOT BE CUT, PRUNED, COVERED WITH FILL, REMOVED OR DAMAGED WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE CITY OF PENTON.. THE RIGHT TO ENTRY GRANTED HEREIN SHALL APPLY TO THE AGENTS, REPRESENTATIVES AND EMPLOYEES OF THE OWNERS OR SUBSEQUENT OWNERS OF THE UNDERLYING PROPERTY. ions 621 b FAIRWAY PLACE S.E. SNOQUALMIE, WA. 98065 PHONE (425) 458,4488 FAX (206) 686-2950 BRETZKE PROPERTY LARRY ROGERS 5526 NE 107H ST. 56'3 NE 10TH ST RENTON, WA, 98059 RENION,WA. 98059 PORHON OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4, S.10 T._23N R,_5E L77DWN.. BY DATE JOB NO. REVISION A.H. 12-14-06 6042-BLA 10-05-2006 CHKD. BY SCALEI SHEET K.B.G. 1"=40' 1 OF 2 O r A THIS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION IN CONFORMANCE WI1H STATE AND COUNTY STATUTES IN --------- OF 2007. rri VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Lu z STAT ROUTE 900 w f 0� a j z w > SITE J Z w a H z 3� > J Q J z > o D H Q z D THE WEST .170 FEET OF THE EAST 310 FEET OF DECLARATION OF COVENANT: THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH 10 ACRES OF THE THE OWNERS OF THE LAND EMBRACED WITHIN THIS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, NORTH 50 ACRES OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST IN RETURN FOR THE BENEFIT TO ACCRUE FROM THIS SUBDIVISION, QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23, NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, BY SIGNING HEREON COVENANT AND AGREE TO CONVEY THE BENEFICIAL INTEREST W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; IN THE NEW EASEMENT SHOWN ON THIS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT TO ANY AN ALL EXCEPT THE: SOUTH 120 FEET OF THE NORTH 150 FEF..T OF FUTURE PURCHASERS OF THE LOTS, OR OF ANY SUBDIVISION THEREOF. THE EAST 70 FEET THEREOF; AND THIS COVENANT SHALL RUN WITH THE LAND AS SHOWN ON THIS LOT LINE AD„USTMENT. EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE NORTH 30 FLET OF SAID SOUTH 10 ACRES. NOTE. FOUND NO EVIDENCE OF EASEMENTS, COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS OF RECORD AFFECTING SUBJECT PROPERTY. STATE OF WASHINGTON VS ” COUNTY OF KING I'',.CERTIFY THAT I KNEW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE T;-b-ITI LARRY W. ROGERS SIGNED THIS INSTRUMENT ON OATH STATED THAT HE AND SHE IS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT OF SUCH ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES MENTIONED IN THIS INSTRUMENT. DATED THIS II&PH DAY OF pd6mA,"rut 2007. PRINTED NAME %+fL-bs {Grab NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RESIDING AT aelliTolli MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Aoft«. 2-6,206-11 otary Public Sta;PHILIP f Washingtph KAO ADPolnt1 Expires Apr 20, 2009 LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICA 111 ryAL LAN EXPIRES /l. PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS; EGRESS & UTILITIES: NEW PRIVATE EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES, IS SHOWN ON THE FACE OF THIS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT. THE OWNERS AND THEIR SUCCESSORS OF LOTS C AND D SHALL NAVE AN EQUAL AND UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE OWNERSHIP AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF -THE' -'PRIVATE INGRESS,.-.EGPESS' 'dD UTILITY EASE/dENT AND APPURTEp�gArE.`r. 'THESE .APPURTE.NANCES AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE TOE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE I�CCESS ROAD, DRAINAGE PIPES, AND STORM WATER QUALITY AND CONVEYANCE FACILITIES LL'CATED WITHIN THIS EASEMENT, PRIVATE SIGNAGE, AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE NOT OWNED BY THE CITY OF PENTON OR OTHER UTILITY PROVIDERS. MAINTENANCE COSTS SHALL.BE SHARED EQUALLY. PARKING ON THE PAVING IN THE ACCESS EASEMENT IS PROHIBITED, UNLESS PAVEMENT WIDTH IS GREATER THAN 20 FEET. NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT: THE NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT (NGPE) AS SHOWN ON THE FACE OF THIS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT IDENTIFIES THE WETLAND AND ASSOCIATED BUFFER AS MODIFIED WITH BUFFER AVERAGING AS SHOWN. THE CPEA.TION OF THE NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT (NGPE) CONVEYS TO THE PUBLIC A BENEFICIAL INTEREST IN THE LAND WITHIN THE EASEMENT AREA. THIS INTEREST SHALL BE FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRESERVING NATIVE VEGETATION FOR THE CONTROL' OF SURFACE WATER AND EROSION, MAINTENANCE OF SLOPE STABILITY, VISUAL AND NATURAL BUFFERING, AND PROTECTION OF PLANT AND ANIMAL HABITATS. THE NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT IMPOSES UPON ALL PRESENT AND FUTURE OWNERS AND OCCUPIERS OF THE EASEMENT AREA ENFORCEABLE ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC BY THE CITY OF PENTON, TO LEAVE UNDISTURBED ALL TREES AND OTHER VEGETATION WITHIN THE EASEMENT AREA, THE VEGETATION WITHIN THE NGPE MAY NOT BE CUT, PRUNED, COVERED WITH FILL, REMOVED OR DAMAGED WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE CITY OF PENTON.. THE RIGHT TO ENTRY GRANTED HEREIN SHALL APPLY TO THE AGENTS, REPRESENTATIVES AND EMPLOYEES OF THE OWNERS OR SUBSEQUENT OWNERS OF THE UNDERLYING PROPERTY. ions 621 b FAIRWAY PLACE S.E. SNOQUALMIE, WA. 98065 PHONE (425) 458,4488 FAX (206) 686-2950 BRETZKE PROPERTY LARRY ROGERS 5526 NE 107H ST. 56'3 NE 10TH ST RENTON, WA, 98059 RENION,WA. 98059 PORHON OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4, S.10 T._23N R,_5E L77DWN.. BY DATE JOB NO. REVISION A.H. 12-14-06 6042-BLA 10-05-2006 CHKD. BY SCALEI SHEET K.B.G. 1"=40' 1 OF 2 O r A THIS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION IN CONFORMANCE WI1H STATE AND COUNTY STATUTES IN --------- OF 2007. rri n N. 5ET 3/8" BAR 4 CAP "6E00 L5# 15025" "TYPICAL" _ v v ui U) cu Lu IC] ti v 0 0 0 z 131.56' 121.6E F BUFFER AVERAC LOT A LINE c i AREA= 11, 431.83 SO. FT.o 0 m441 07 wLB�e\ BRE7ZKE-ROGERS LOT LiNE ADJUSTMENT SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 10, TWP. 23N., PGE. 5E., W. M. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY WASHINGTON GRAPHIC SCALE 1"=40' BEARING MERIDIAN. 3 2 A BEAR:[NG OF N00'02'42"E ALONG THE EAST SECTION LINE NORTH LINE OF 0 40 80 120 BETWEEN THE NE SEC. CORNER AND THE E. 1/4 CORNER OF SEC. 10-23-05 SECTION,' 10-23-05, PER KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NO. L02S0016, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 172 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 205, RECORDS 6 OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. �' w CITY OF RENTON CONTROL POINT NO, 1845 03/02/2006 rn a FOUND 4" CONC MONUMENT N WITH 1/2" COPPER PIN, - DOWN .1.5' IN CASE N, E, I 7 OTH STREET "PUBLIC SEC. CORNER OF m �, "PUBLIC' ROADWAY" SEC. 10-23-5 G S88 1.10"E 661.78' CALC'E oo '1, c N o 588'16'10"E 431.69' SITE BENCH MAW 100.04' 100.04' '-CATCH BASIN v ui 100.04' ! RIM ELEV.=469.24' 70.00' 7\ R -O -W 140.00' 80.03' 588'16'10"E N ` \\ 45.00' 11 \\ 50 I 1 SB�B'16' 12"E 1 69 1 WLB NEW UNE y�1O 30.00' G \ \ \ WLBI I� \ \ \ \ 4j v of P PO10� QP 1�G NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT 131.69 , LINE OF N 50 ACRES OF N 1/4 WETLAND NOTES: 1) THE WETLAND FLAGS AND SOIL LUG PITS SHOWN ON THE MAP PAGE WERE DERIVED BY BERGER/ABAM ENGINEERS, INC. ON FEBRUARY 17,2006. GEODIMENSIONS, INC. LOCATED THESE FLAGS ON MARCH 2, 2006. THE WETLAND FLAGS SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE MARKED AS FOUND IN FIELD. WETLAND TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 N55'28'30"W 5.63' L2 515'10'19"E 24.69' L3 S09'25'03"E 24.99' L4 N34'46'14"W 38.28' L5 S59'44'05"E 25.12' L5 520'44'08"E 17.82' L7 N29'03'44"W 36.32' L8 N32'46'25"W 47.41' L9 S51 '02'54"E 53.77' L10 544'51'02"E 70.99' L11 S72'17'41"E 28.34' L12 S87 -38'14"E 32.09' L13 S46°43'31"E 36.91' OLD LINE a C> / r o NEW ti 3 cu UNE ( NOTE: ao > r o/ N FOUND NO ENCROACHMENTS a J mPERTAINING TO SUBJECT PROPERTY. Lu N PRIV TE INGRESS, EGRESS N o co f SF w h�Po AND UTILITY, EASEMENT Lu Q 0, ADDRESScu 4 Oco v/ o LOT A 5501 NE 10TH ST m o NOTE: a/ LOT B 5515 'NE LOTH ST, m m• z EASEMENT AREA �/ o LOT C 5521 NE 10TH ST cu Q INSIDE LOT C o� z LOT O 5603 NE 10TH ST \ Q� 2, 318 S0. FT. +/- z N S88'16- 10"E a NEW UNE OLD LINE30.01' S88'16' 10"E S88'16' 10"E No m 39.99' 70.03' cy S88'16' 10"E o SBB'16'10"E rn 70.03' Z .00' cu L3 co w Gov o j 7. 0 J N N Q Q 140.03'cu 0/> J P60- a cP N UNE LB NOTE: o�ti� EASEMENT AREA E�L7�S` G z }eco INSIDE LOT D 4, 107 SO. FT. +/- o co m �wETLAND BUFFER LINE m m LOT C\ ° goti a co co AREA=83,130.91 50.FT. w w �6• Lo WLBo, I OLD LINE m ` `cu cu w N ` o N61 o v w z UN! z 0 cu 00 cu \ I G z o WLBF� z Ill - - -�� I WLBE L 12 WLBD � ` 0 !', , I 100.04' 100.04' V S88'20'02"E 961.78' S8B'20'02"E 501.84' CITY OF RENTON LUA-05-108-LLA J�v VVbILANL) dUH*N AREA TABLE LOT A "BUFFER" AREA = 5.748 S0. FT. +/- LOT B "BUFFER" AREA = 402 SO FT.+/ - LOT C "BUFFER" AREA = 16, 669 SO. FT. +/- LOT D "BUFFER" AREA = 815 SO FT.+/- WLBG WLBE WLBE, SBB-20'02"E 170.07' 70.00' LEGEND FOR MAP PAGE 1$- FOUND MONUMENT ON 03/02/2006 AS NOTED ® FOUND REBAR AS NOTED • SET 3/8" BAR 6 CAP "GEOD LS # 15025" CENTERLINE OF ROAD PROPERTY LINES TO BE MI NEW PROPERTY LINE AkWETLAND FLAG "MARKED AS FOUND IN FIELD" ----------- EDGE OF WETLANDS - - - - - - WETLAND BUFFER EDGE 5ET 3/8" BAR $ CAP "6E00 L5# 15025" "TYPICAL" I�T���T�JLyX�Il.9�i7 CITY OF RENTON BENCH MARK NO, REN12101 03/02/2006 FOUND 2" DIA, CONC' 1C MONUMENT WITH COPPER PI DOWN 1.6' IN CASE ELEV.'ON TACK = 512.02' E. 1/4 CORNER W ¢/ OF SEC. 10-23-5 i, w �f co "q ov o� 10 15 CIIYOFRENTON CONTROL POINT NO. 1852 03/02/2006 FOUND 3" SURFACE BRASS DISC WITH PUNCH MARK 11 SE SEC. CORNER OF SEC. 10-23-5 14 Lil SB8'16'10"E 26,01' L2 • S00'02'42"W 104.78' L'3 SB8'16' 10"E 55.75' 1-4 S00'02'42"W 20.01' L5 N88'16'10"W 140.03' L6 N00'02'44"E 20.01' L7 N00'02'42"E 103.31' LINE I ARC I RADIUS I DELTA C11 40.01' 25.00' 91'41'08" C21 38.53' 25.00' 88.18'52" VERTICAL DATUM: (VISITED 03-02-2006) CITY OF RENTON BENCH MARK NO. RENT2101 (NAVD 1988) A. "SEE MAP FOR DETAILED INFORMATION" ELEVATION ON COPPER PIN = 512.02' CITY OF RENTON LUA-05-108-LLA, V. 197, PAGE 057, KC RECORDS KING COUNTY BLA NO. L02S0016, V. 175, PAGES 205 AND 206, KC RECORDS RECORD OF SURVEY, V. 152, PAGE 83, KC RECORDS.