The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA-08-011_Report 1WA COVER SHEET , , I ~~ II ftticilU II ••• COLI.M3IA BAN( -RENTON I i AH8L JOB NO. -"20..,,7533..,.10'--__ _ .J n ~I 'I;g !I~ II II ;I ill p III '" iii .. .. .. m S .. .. -:.. AHBL ..JOB NO. 207533.1) I I I I. I 1.1 II ! I I I' " , I " I, I'~ I'l I 1,,1 II. " I I I' ""I f. ~ __ i'i -t--"f!' ~ .. _~-' ),' ~- \ \. \ i '. , " I--__ " I ~-~ " I \ - ,: \ •• 0" : \ "I "" _~/_ \ II -"" : r; - - --" I \ : I· \. -J- "'-, -~ Slx L; i • I d I , ~ , • i I i ! '" ~ t: ... i ... r-• z '" '" m z '" : ! ~ I : ' "<-_oj ~• !~ iI illll ' P ~E "5! iG> .~ ~ ... '!1l i ,,~ II' I wB i"; nil t .1. ill t 'Ii I • ill TREE CLEAfII'.JG AN:> OEMOUTION PLAN COLl.M3IA BAN< -RENTON ~ i =-ID~ I, a ~ ~ Ronton, WuhirVon, 98057 """"" 800 ,".W' , i I : I I I' AIft.. JOB NO. -""''''7533.'''''''10 ___ _ T .E.S.C" F\.AN I. a ,- 800 98402 WA GRADING & DRAINAGE PlAN ~ .~ '. 0,0 " gil "'- Ii "" r --_ " '::; II II , -----;---." --j---I I COLUMEllA BAMe -RENTClN AH3L JOB NO. -"20"-'7533""'.10"--__ _ , I I I II ' I :~~-r .. 11 : _ ~ "'-" / __ ._ II :;; ! ~t1'~ II I :1'-~ W I I~_ ~)f. " ~" l't" " \ i! "" \ Ii "" -]\ -----'::: I· \. ill ; AI-A . k"A NO 207533.10 U1UTYPl.AN COLUMBIA BA/II( -FENTON II I' . I I, . rl . I: i; I I: I . I :1 X - " =--=- PAVNGPlAN Ii I i Ii I I-•• I: ~ II i \' ~ I 'I , ~ , I r I I , 800 COLWBIA BAN< -FENTON 98402 z 0 ::tJ -i J: IT! » UI -i IT! UI Z r 0 0 IT! C ::tJ < -i -i » J: J: -i ::!! ::!! (5 IT! IT! Z UI UI Ui -i -i "' IT! IT! ::j r r l: IT! IT! en < ~ " » "' r -i -i ~ (5 (5 J> Z Z ::! 0 ~ I [ [ , , ~'; ;,,~ ~) ;:~ ~:':" , ': ~'; ~~~ , ~~ , , ~;~~ , , !I~II ~!;?T~~~BIA BANK g ~L-EVAT'ONS ~~ i'" m ~" " ~~ ~~ i~ ,'1~ il.~ , ~::: -;'1 , , ;~~ ;"1 J '~~$OI.IT:' J""'O~ ~VL"UC sucr[ >200 ""m .... w"""""" .. ,""',,"'" -J~ tJ t -i~ ";'J Ii ~~ z~ ( ;," ~ I' UI 0 C -i J: IT! » UI -i IT! r IT! < ~ 0 Z " I ---ct Sow. 7rf STREET _ 12" 'II ('I) !\w COr.: to--~ , i 12" \'i (R) _/_.2-.1~~_ __, : '-~-_~_' ___ ~ ____ ~ 'vv , F~--,,'" ~~-'-T-'-T ~ D ~_,WVJ IH-O '~'"'""'~"'"""~I [ -1'1' ---,,' B SR89~;Q!krf!:_Y~:-__ -"-_-'::=~_~ J !, -----, i / Em, ,;r;~/~ _ ___ '-:04.5-;' •. ~ ,".,---1\1' i ' --v.L.,.. I ! L I "~ii:"&ii~';, " ?, 'r-;, ---I'~ r) '--l hL!"p;;f", I~ " ' ,'~ , ' ! /_ : '" " j r ,-,,' .....-J '<--' ~I:: , (-:-J ' ,-Ii! ''''~ I; iii!; ! ," '., 'i""OC'~ '~:J ~ U'" ! ,~ : ~{-;;,' "'_~,,_ ,:l:;i , it '"Wee . ~ ,--'--CO---;-'e5-,o.u.? ~"9~T'Ll5 I.e (1---'1!'!L====== ,t I ~ 1-'=./' -k-l I, / I ' ,., f ~ '--"ii-\.-L i'c '/~ /;. I ! ~ z '-""." --6 v ' \;~. ,- l31_L Y ~..1cHALlS R=-STAURANT i+ h , co i' .:0 uc <~ ~ ~ ,", i< .. ~} "' i>< :-- '" z ~~~ L I :d~r; I §j;lI' I ~ '~~9li j " 'J ---I ;'" " J ,-=:J 4 rfl ~"~"" V'l':> "'" ~,// \;x)\ h tl J r , 1 STORY WOO[) FRA~.'E ~', " --:;-,. -' ,,' ,,,,,-~ / /f7, ,~' ,,"~'",~'""'':'',' "~'," U I 'I L...,/ . ---~----.. ~ V '--III ' .--.' ::'1' ,_+~ c? ~>:I oil' c;), ->, I I ~~.-.. -~-~... ~~k .--r.:...... '""J'; I »W~~"" ._\-=-~_~! L============- '* J L :5!$,t'"G / .' ~-, <- 1 --;',:~,s A'~~~'~;:;c ~·I~~?~~~,~.c;:.~;)~r~:R ~"r.mr~'D c· ',:. F(,(~,~ ',',q'.T r'" ~ PEe: ,,:;~, ;,~().~'JU &: ,'/l':;'" 5)078 , / ,r~r I' " f1 I -,,-" C: --""-------! J '---"'" tr~ .'. II~) "''''=,~" II' t:{--------::':1--- wy, ... _ _ ... '«v ($; 'I ,',11 ' _+11 ___ _ -,..-~~ I '.... ",~,,/ 43 1 7g' ":"..,.,,--. --~.Dl' -'-,,-' ~-, '--~88'd5 24 I ~-==:::::::----i r 'F) OG< 1:1 ,. , z' <I L ~ L CO~,_ , BUI! I) NG NORTH 0\ SITE PLAN "'-_/ I " 20'-0" .. :.:.~-~ c. , ;', ,. " >- .~- \l I I \ ! 1._) ~lJi iii r r--c" -',-t'"""--UJ, --, , I!: i I LJ; i ! . 5' Yf'IIT" '_A,:Jl--\'F~Y PFP, .. J-REe. \0 S /C4()i 1-1 '~f; PROJ.NO. 208-2330 en I' 0:: ~~ ILl ~! '" Z . Ii I-~' 0::-= 0(0( D.c6 dSl-~ hll 0( 1-1 N-,j U::t:! Z Ul' ILl 0:: ! i No(!i -'-:t;-' :::.::: ~ Z . « ~ In <C -In ~ :J~ .J~ O~ U~ ""-,,~ 01/10/0B REV1S1ON .... ,~ PRINTD.lTE 01/18/08 ""-20&2330 A1 (D\-- -". ~ ,---- I " , , -±; -.!- I I ~ I I ( I .1 , ' , ) , ?!AlR ------'--1 , ~ECH. FILE 5Ei{VER ~~ ~ci.; WALL SCHEDULE ",",."" ~"-J. ' ... ';r""'· ... '''n''''' .. '~~C'" ""'C" ~~~"'~~~~~~~N~tt' , ... """' ..... ·~~i!'~<m:'·~~;.iil'''''' !:';!t· .. .'-; .. -,""',,~'Q""''''''Of r==l l:=J o F.9 ~?~ F'RIVATE' ~~.t~NG " (72 ' -~i~~~~~;<,:::, ;"f~~~~'j,"l~U'f:lfl~"~' . I ' "','"."::::~::..",:';C._'" " MGR. I II ._ ~l~"='::'~~':,:::1' i1j'" --I ~ ~_,_u'" ),:'lL~,";,g~_ ",..,,~.. l ........ ~~'§J.6,~ ................ s~:§":~ " ~~ •• '"""",,, ",0 "" m " i);<-co!<f'olO<>U~cb'_"""'~ ""~'~C.,," __ __ 'Jt:d,::r,.j"~,~~=~~""",,. =11~~:;:~~ \l) 0 """"""",,,,,-..;.-t""<.'_' --<I> o ~~il£4Ehi~~~i::,:' """,f!><.' l > ~; (7"VO"~'~"~F~IR~S~T~F~L~O~O~R~P~LA~N~====~~~ ~j= 1'7,;> r ~FFICE I / -----,..---- /' , ' '~,~' (~~\, '-~.' /~.~\ ~\ ,-..." , / -' -.~ 206-2330 - In ji 0:: J UI ng Z ." ct: !' 1-. 0::-: ct:ct: 11.00 d:I t i ~ lLI i ct: 1-. ~ :til z ()!. lLI 0:: i 1 N ct: jj p ~ 3 Z • . 0 < 1 , !Xl ! < -!Xl :E :H .J" O~ ()~ -~M 01/10/08 -~~re _~re 01/18/08 -~()J "U 208·2330 -A3 : "'! i _~1~0 Ul 1"1 o o z o "II 5 o ;:0 'U 5: z ': II~!IIIIII / / in ~ c i ~\ I~ I~ ~ .... -~__r_---.c -~ .~~·~"_~~~i .... ~""--.. I +-------··t····· .~" ( n : S W 7TH ST"E.ET -'.--~.' -'-~-~-' -=---,"" =:;;::::--~-.,~ *M££;;~~~,'QI~~:[r-,: To"" .,j/ =~ .. axxxxo-:mJ= ..... a;'II"'2?oA~.. ....... ~-~\."' r. ' f.\~~ ; " (= <-I (-~-3rI.~' ~ . """""""f / ,. i9. / / -, " ,-", . . , L_ " '. (~ / / gf<6}c?/ / ~., ~ ff'Q,x; -•. ' ~-I'fvV Afo'r"'!, d •. ' -=-1 ~ ,..,. -_., f~--,,!~I.~~ r ~~g <= ,I ~ /U' ____ """ 8~'i-T"'" c..:> I I .-"-'~-'~ ,"~1.~~o " j --:; . ~ ---:-< ,:g II i ~~'~.-_ :,~ , , ----'.! \!i • . "1 ;<, .~g n-, I LL o u (J\ LANDSCAPE PLAN ! = \,-j / ", />J;:c ~;:':~:::,-~" : //~"." yw", ~<1i;'l;'iE~ ~~~1';::';.~;,;!£;~';'~ SU&GRADING DETAIL S-=--O" \:,~, ,,~$I ~, °7 «\-' ;:;::.::.- £'of"......, """' ~"', J.:",. -,: ,-'~-: ~~;"",t~~.'~ .... GROUND COVER PLANTING ,m, 61£;1])) t'v).~ 'c ~?:;, 1'-.. \ """'" I -r...? q .:;, .............. -'" "~" j ~~,,~~;\,""Y-,., ..... _-", ~. ,"'1H;;L~~~:: i !! ;;;::5::' " ~~ :.~:::/ ~. , u ~! TREE PLANnNG DETAIL. ;U I6QOW /"':'"" I ~;;,,:.::.. , /,,..~ ~ ~~"""~~~ ..", ~~ , '". . '''"" .. ,1 '"'-~''' SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL .03 dM Ii LANDSCAPE LEGEND e i1;l .. ',,,, "",," •• ,.-"" o ~.r_'~~' "''''''''¥'',''''''''" o ",_~~'._,w .• "", .~, o ""'M~""=""" (9 """ .... ~."''''--=.,.'''''.......,,,.,,.''' ..... .,., o _.""""'ru. ..... """~'''''''''''-,''''''''''''' e "" .... "'~..,.....,..,.<" ~ ..... 0""" __ , .... ,,,"',",_ @ •• "" ... ..,""~. ,.. ..... ~ .......... " CO"" o 0==_""=","''''''' ,.~". .. o ~a:1$,,'0.¥~~ " ,-"',,-,,,,--c o ~ ~,~ .. =".-~= GENERAL. LANDSCAPE NOTES -.,.-~~'" "., , ,,~~,,--. ~.-"""."'"" '" .,,,,.".,,,~,"""-<"-' • ... co·"" '""eo",,'", ""~"""""' .. .,.'",,~ ,,,,,,,~~,,,,~ ~-~. ~§;~F~~~ff;i~~i.Z£;~",£~,~' '~"~'''''~'''''''''''''O''''''''''''''_''''''''''''''''~_'''". , ...... ""'",,~~--,~-,-~.~""~ '~ .. ",.".....----. -"",~",,,,--,.,,,,-,,,,,,",,, PIIOJ,r;o. 208-2330 - Ul II 0:: , • W !! Z .(1' 1-. 0::-= « a. -dj~ ~u! <Wi N !:!, u :r: li Z Ul l W 0:: i l N<d ~ ~ ~ l Z . 0( i CO l 0( -CO ::E. ~~ .J~ Oli U~ ~., 01/10/08 -i'E"lSlOl'~'L PfU~tlO.TE 01/18/08 ~ .. 20&2330 -L1 iii , II lXi" :~c ,·cpo; , \ ____ J 'Iit<HIARl #Z21§ (P.-'lS-:;R-'" ~-f " ~.J ~~ ",,.,,"",. '","""" '~""""'''''£.!O "'''''''''''''''''' u;..m.'·!4 ~ I .. , '.~'} " c;=> I -----, i= = i 1= -s v = = < 61~ Co 1 --,. ---', I , "',"""""''' ",':. '''''-',1 , ::. '!'~, c= I 1 .~~,= '] " :" 1" ", ' I J ' . . T I: 9~ II JL db (' fUTU~~.~~1L~IJ_n , 1 1 )<,""~ I -" , 1 1 1 , L ______ _ !! ~:. . j M''',I; ''J~~ " " .' b--.----..-..-.-,....,J ~-'-,,' l:;:::J ~ ~ = ,.,. 1 c::::J I 1': = = = SO' = 1 i , , I o::S I , I I Cb = = == ' i I i = d=o t L-- 1 = =' t-• I i c? ~-~ 1-:: i--- d,_d~ ill' , ;o,,~,;,I,j :::J 1 m ~ I ~ I ,-t I ~-'.~\' I'A, ::.z;~ 1', " ' ", i,l, 6 = ~~JI l! rP:X~r RAINIEAAVENUE~-:r,"'-,-L-",,-',-j,d [ ~' !8,':<ii¥ i,'~---n '1< _--: I ""i') U ,_----l' I 'c/ /7 HARDie AWNUFSW ' , -.=~==~' ----~---._---==_. ~ tI"cr~=-== ---~~'~'~~~:~==~::-~=l::~~' _F::~_ 1 _-washin8t~;~ ~, ign _.-: foo,' "-~NE~~-;~~;~~~EO-~~Lo;~~~-I'-- rf;;Jnn;"g& E"gmeermg II HARDIE A'JENUE'f,W , 'C700M""o'i.~ .......... ~N, 5",'~511J II ' .I.ml., >l-A ~!n RENTON, WASHINCTQN (>0.;,' '."~11~ ,.v, (1061 )65·0115 _______________ .• " .. ~ i ~ ~ .. SITE LOCATION _~_r> ~'---.<s;;"..----~~......-------- 1;!IAPHIC SC J.U: ----=-=--" t~.....-, ,-------, SITE PLAN EXHIBIT CC"lj May 14, 2008 J eny Isaksen Zenczak & Partners-Architects 4545 S Union Avenue ste: #200 Tacoma, W A .98409 SUBJECT: Columbia Bank -Renton LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF Dear Mr. Isaksen: CIT-'--OF RENTON Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietscb, Administrator Please find enclosed, comments from the City's Police Department. These comments give you instructions to follow throughout the constructi()n phase of your project. If you have any questions feel free to contact me at (425) 430~7219. S"-~~ Ie Timmons As ociatePlanner Enclosure cc: Bonnell Family LLC I Owner Hugo Vanderwaall Applicant --~--------1-O-55-S-0-uili--G-m-d-y-W-a-y--R-e-n-to-n,-w-a-S-hm-.~-o~.n-9-8-0-57-------------~ ~ -AHEAD OF THE CURVE \:%I Thispaper =ntains 50% recycled material. 30% postconsumer PROJECT LUA·Oa-011, SA·A, ECI" Columbia State Bank City of Renton Department of Planning I Building I Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENTAL APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) POLICE RELATED COMMENTS 21 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually CONSTRUCTION PHASE Theft from construction sites is one of the most commonly reported crimes in the City. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site should have security lighting, and any construction trailer or storage area should be completely fenced·in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective criminal and will demonstrate that the area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should be fitted with heavy-duty deadbolts with a minimum 1-1/2" throw when bolted. Glass windows in construction trailers should be shatter-resistant. Toolboxes and storage containers should be secured with heavy-duty padlocks and kept locked when not in use. "No Trespassing" signs should be posted on the property during the construction phase. These signs allow officers, upon contact, to provide a verbal warning to trespassers that should they be contacted on the property again, they could be cited and/or arrested. COMPLETED COMPLEX All exterior doors should be made of solid metal or metal over wood, with heavy-duty dead bolt locks, latch guards or pry-resistant cylinders around the locks, and peepholes. If glass doors are used, they should be fitted with the hardware described above and additionally be fitted with a layer of security film. Security film can increase the strength of the glass by up to 300%, greatly reducing the likelihood of breaking glass to gain entry. Access to the back of the buildings should be limited, preferably with security fencing, as these areas could be vulnerable to crime due to the lack of natural surveillance by business customers or tenants. It is recommended that the commercial areas be monitored with recorded security alarm systems installed. It's not uncommon for businesses to experience theft and/or vandalism during the hours of darkness. An auxiliary security service could be used to patrol the property during those times. It is important to direct all foot traffic into the main entrance of the buildings. Any alternative employee entrances should have coded access to prevent trespassing. Security Survey Page 1 of 2 08-011 If there are payphones 01 Ie the businesses, it is recommer I they be outgoing use only. Public payphones tend tu attract drug traffic and having olllY the ability to call out on payphones severely hinders this type of activity. All areas of this project need to have adequate lighting. This will assist in the deterrent of theft from motor vehicle (one of the most common crimes in Renton) as well as provide safe pedestrian travel for customers utilizing the businesses. The structureshould have building numbers clearly posted with numbers at least 6" in height and of a color contrasting with the building. This will assist emergency personnel in locating the correct location for response. Landscaping should be installed with the objective of allowing visibility -not too dense and not too high. Too much landscaping will make customers and employees feel isolated and will provide criminals with concealment to commit crimes such as burglary and malicious mischief (property destruction). It important to have appropriate lighting and signage. "No Trespassing" signs should be posted in conspicuous locations throughout the property, including entrances to the property and parking areas. I highly recommend that the developer have a Renton Police Crime Prevention Representative conduct a security survey of the premises once construction is complete. Security Survey Page 2 of 2 08-011 Citl !enton Department of Planning I Building II c Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY -~~~~~~~:~~~~:~~~:~~~~~~~~i ~S~i~te~p~l~an approval and Environmental (SEPAl i parking and landscaping on a 42,019 square foot lot the site would be provided via two access roads off of SW 7th • A. IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable Mo", Element of the Probable Probable Me", Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants ~ Land/Shoreline Use Itililles Animals Environmental Health 'ubtic Se,.",ees Energy/ Natural Resources ;~~~~;':: B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or~~~resentative Date CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: April 28, 2008 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. --......--~.--.... ,.---', ••• " ...... ~ -_ .... .-,..,. " ..... _""_"'"~~ ...... -I •• ""~,·L' ........ ,.,....,. ••. '''''''-. ~1 Project Name: Columbia Bank -Renton LUA (file) Number: LUA-08-011, SA-A, ECF !- C __ ro_s_s_-R_ef __ e_r_e_nc_e_s_: _________________________________________________________ I" . AKA's: , I Project Manager: {:--~------~------------------------------------------------------------; Acceptance Date: February 15, 2008 I Applicant: Hugo Vanderwaal, Columbia State Bank , Owner: Bonnell Family LLC ; Contact: Jerry Isaksen, Zenczak & Partners -Architects . I PID Number: 1923059072 ; ERC Decision Date: March 10, 2008 1 ERC Appeal Date: March 31, 2008 , Administrative Approval: March 10, 2008 , Appeal Period Ends: March 31, 2008 I Public Hearing Date: : Date Appealed to HEX: : By Whom: HEX Decision: .' 1 Date Appealed to Council: j By Whom: Date: ~ Council Decision: Date: 1 Mylar Recording Number: ~ Project Description: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and i ! Environmental (SEPAl Review for the construction of a two-story 8,600 square foot bank with assoicated parking and landscaping on a 42,019 square foot lot located within the Commerical , Arterial (CA) zoning designation, Access to the site would be provided via two proposed access j roads off of SW 7th Street I Location: 225 SW 7th Street " Comments: I ! Hugo Vanderwaal Columbia State Bank 5210 74th Street W ste: #B Lakewood, WA 98499 tel: (253) 396-6900 (applicant) Robert F. Greenwall Co. LP PO Box 2399 Kailua-Kona, HI 96745-2399 tel: (808) 326-1440 (party of record) Updated: 03/18/08 PARTIES OF RECORD COLUMBIA BANK -RENTON LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF Jerry Isaksen Bonnell Family LLC Zenczak & Partners -Architects 4545 S Union Avenue ste: #200 Tacoma, WA 98409 10047 Main Street ste: #509 Bellevue, WA 98004 tel: (253) 475-0380 eml: studio@zpaaia.com (contact) (owner) (Page 1 of 1) April 29, 200S Jerry Isaksen Zenczak & Partners -Architects 4545 S Union Avenue #200 Tacoma, W A 98409 SUBJECT: Columbia Bank -Renton LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF Dear Mr. Isaksen: CIT~OF RENTON Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator This letter is to inform you that the appeal period ended March 31, 200S for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated and the Site Plan approval for the above-referenced projcct. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination and the Site Plan approval therefore, these decisions are final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC MitigationMeasures and Site Plan Conditions of Approval outlined in the Report & Decision datcd March 10,200S. !fyou have any questions, please feel free to contact meat (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, ~~ eTimmons As ciate Planner Enclosure Cc: Bonnell Family LLC IOwner(s) HugoVanderwaall Applicant Robert F. Greenwall Co. LP I Party(ies) of Record ------~-----JO-55-S-0-u-ili-G-r-ad-y-W-a-y---R-en-to-n-,w--as-h-m-gOO-n--98-0-57~-----------~ * Thls'~rCOlllains 50% recycled material, 30% pos~consu~ AHEAD ·OF THE CURVE Denis Law, Mayor April 8, 2008 J eITY Isaksen Zenczak & Partners -Architects 4545 S. Union Avenue Ste #200 Tacoma, W A 98409 CITY F RENTON Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator Subject: Approval of Stacking Space Modification Request Columbia Bank -Renton Branch 225 SW 7th Street Dear Mr. Isaksen: This letter is sent in response to your March 31 SI request (attached) for a modification from section 4-4-080.J5 of the City's parking regulations. Summary of Request The applicant is proposing the construction of a new Columbia Bank branch on a 42,019 square foot site. The site is located on the south side ofSW 7th Street, between Lind Ave SW and Hardie Ave SW. The proposed 2-story building would be approximately 8,600 square feet in size. The applicant is proposing to locate three cllstomer drive-through lanes on the n01thwest elevation. Queuing should allow for a minimum of five vehicles per window to provide adequate space to handle peak business demands. The proposal would require a tolal or 15 stacking spaces. The applicant is proposing a total of 14 stacking spaces. In order to obtain land use approval and a building permit for the proposed building, the applicant is required to obtain a parking modification to reduce the minimum stacking spaces from the five required for each lane. Section 4-4-080.F.1O.d allows the Administrator to grant modifications from the parking standards for individual cases, provided the modification meets the following criteria (pursuant to RMC 4-9-250.0.2): a. Will meet the objectives and saCcly, function, appearance. environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; and b. Will not be injurious to other property(ies) in the vicinity; and c. Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and d. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and e. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. -------------I-05-5-S-o-u-ili-G-r-ad-y-w-a-Y~--R-e-nt-o-n,-w-a-s-hi-ng-t-on--9-S0-5-7-------------~ * This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CLRVE Background The applicant, Columbia Bank, has requested a modification from section 4-4-080.F of the City's Parking Regulations in order reduce the minimum stacking space requirement. The proposed building would be sited in such a way that the three drive through lanes, located on the northwest elevation, would only allow for 14 stacking spaces. The code applies in this instance because the proposed building requiresl5 stacking spaces for three drive-thrOllgh lanes. Because the proposed stacking spaces are less than the minimum required, Mr. Isaksen has requested a parking modification on behalf of Columbia Bank. Analysis a) Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment. If approved, the number of stacking spaces would be a reduction from 15 to 14 spaces. The applicant contends that the inclusion of the third lane provides less individual lane stacking and eliminates the potential of backing into the driveway, thus creating a safer environment for pedestrians walking into the facility. The requested modification conforms to the intent and purpose of the parking regulations by providing adequate stacking space Cor the amount necessary for the Columbia Bank building. The proposed stacking space conforms to the interest and purpose of the parking regulations by providing adequate space to handle peak business demands for customer drive-trough activities of Columbia Bank. The reduction of stacking space less than what is allowed should have no negative impact relative (0 the environment. The proposal would reduce the amount of impervious surface and allow for more landscaping and aesthetic appeal. b) Will not be injurious to other property(ies) in the Vicinity. The proposed stacking spaces would provide adequate space to handle peak business demands for customer drive-trough activities. It is not anticipated that the approval of a modification to permit 14 stacking spaces would be injurious to other properties in the vicinity. c) Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code. See discussion under criterion '·a". d) Can be shown to be justified and reqnired for the use and situation intended. The stacking space standards (4-4-080.F) require a minimum of five vehicles per drivc- through window. Based upon the customer volumes the applicant anticipates the reduction of the minimum stacking space requirement is considered to be reasonable. e) Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. As stated under criterion "a" & "b". the proposed parking should not create adverse impacts to other properties ill the Y,cinity of the banking branch. ; , Decision The parking modification for Columbia Bank is hereby approved. Appeal Process: Appeals of this administrative decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. April 22, 2008. Appeals must be filed in writing, together with the required $75.00 application fee, with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, W A 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 O.B. Additional infornlation regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have questions regarding this decision feel free to contact Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner, at (425) 430-7219. Sincerely, Neil Watts, Director Dcvc1o~lllent Services Division cc: Jennifer Henning, Planning Manager attachment II~' ~ , 20[J ~ . I Date f ~.,.·.'.~~I ......• Ai_ ._b_E_N_C_Z_A_K_&_P_A_R_T_N_E_R_S_A_R_C_H_IT_E_C_T_S-c:(~=5~-C:4;'--!_~-~-O' ~n. 4545 SOUTH UNION AVENUE SUITE 200 FAX 475-3553 TACOMA. WASHINGTON 98409 March 26, 2008 Ms. Rocale Timmons City of Renton Development Services 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 RE: LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF Dear Rocale, BOLESLAW ZENCZAK. A,I.A J ER RY A ISAKS EN RICK T ,ADAMS PAUL V TR.'\CY KARE;:.'J ':) GENOWAY In response to the "determination of non significance -mitigated" comments dated March 10, 2008, I wanted to address decision Item G.1 regarding stacking spaces. As stated in RMC4-4-080F item # 10, the number of required parking spaces table states under "Drive through services" The drive-through facility shall be so located that sufficient on-site vehicle stacking space is provided for the handling of motor vehicles using such facility during peak business hours. Typically 5 stacking spaces per window are required unless otherwise determined by the Development Services Director. Stacking spaces cannot obstruct required parking spaces or ingress/egress within the site or extend into the public right-ol-way." Per section "A" of the parking regulations. it is understood that the purpose of the regulations is to promote the safety, general welfare and aesthetics of the city The proposed bank building intends to provide a safe, aesthetically pleasing drive-up for use by their customers. Although the submitted site plan shows ten vehicles. the site plan actually allows for fourteen (14) 20' stacking spaces. Based on drive-up use at other existing branches. two lanes would provide sufficient stacking (per city of Renton requirements) during peak hour demand. Existing branches have 6-8 vehicles within three drive- up lanes during peak hours. Although two lanes would meet the city of Renton regulations, the bank insisted on a third drive-up lane to ensure that their customers would not have to wait behind more than one (or two per peak hour demand) vehicles. Furthermore, the inclusion of the third lane provides less Individual lane stacking and eliminates the potential of backing into the driveway. thus creating a safer environment lor pedestrians walking into the facility. The requested reduction in stacking space would also be advantageous to both the bank as well as the city in that it would reduce the amount of impervious surtace and allow for more landscaping and aesthetic appeal. Based upon the facts as stated in this letter, I would appreciate your review and approval of the stacking spaces as previously submitted under the Administrative design review (file # LUA08-011). Please contact me with any questions or comments. Thank you Sincerely, Jerry A. Isaksen, AlA ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON...sIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTeD TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Columbia Bank PROJECT NUMBER: LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF LOCATION: 225 SW 7th Street OESCRIPnON: The applicant is requesting Administratlv9 Site Plan approval and ErlVlronmeot~1 (SEPA) Review for the construction of 3 two-story 8,600 square fool bank with anolc.ated parking and landscaping on a 42,019 square foot lot located within the Commerical Arterial (CAl zoning designation. AOC@55 to tha site would be provided lila two proposed access roads off of SW 7th street. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE (ERG) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination mUSt be flied In wrHlng on or before 5:00 PM on March at, 2008. Appeale must be filed In writing together with the requl .... d $15.00 applic.atlon f .. 1'1111>: Hearing EMnliner, City of Renton, 1065 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section -4-8-110.8. Additional information .... garding Ihe appeal proc:,". may be obtained from Iha Renlon City Clerk's OffIce, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. ,~" Renton FOR CERTIFICATION I, &('01<--/tfJJllltJY/ [ , hereby certify that J copies of the above document were posted by me in ..3..-conspicuous places or nearby the described property on DATE: 3/; 7/ t) t (cdr. A TIEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in So!!d:::t;t Q , on the ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Columbia Bank PROJECT NUMBER: LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF LOCATION: 225 SW 7th Street DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a two-story 8,600 square foot bank with assoicated parking and landscaping on a 42,019 square foot lot located within the Commerical Arterial (CA) zoning designation. Access to the site would be provided via two proposed access roads off of SW 7th Street. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on March 31, 2008. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8·110.8. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510_ IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. SITE 1923a~12 Renton -,-".' I , . .. '*923059019 ~ ; 1t11230S906S "~19230s0074 • "»,-' • ~~ ,,,," " .M"·· FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when o;ll1ln9 for i>roper file identification_ STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period, The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on March IS, 2008. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $96.60: ff~~~d2:, LindaM. Mills Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter Subscribed and sworn to me this 18th day of March, 2008. State of Washington, Residing NonCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Comrniuee has issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for (he following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. ColumlJi.l,I,_,B~ I IJAOS-Clt I, SA-A, ECF Location: 225 SW 7th Street. The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for [he construction of a two-story 8,600 square foot bank with associated parking and landscaping on a 42,019 square foot commercial pad located within the Commerical Arterial (CA) zoning designation. Access to the site would be provided via two existing curb cut<; off of SW 7th Street. Appeals ofthe environmental detenninalion must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on March 31. 2008. Appeals must be fikJ in writing together with the required 575.00 application fee with Hearing Examiner. City of Renton, 105.5 South Grady Way. Renton. WA 98057. Appea1:- 10 the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-B-11 O.H. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office. (425) 430-6510, Published in the Renton Reponer on March 15,2008. #57 [52. ......" ~." ~ rlC.." ............ '\)"\ t .. '.J' (. 1 ':, ---.... ~-.... '.' "\\\\1111 '.... , .:: f......'<. ~~~'\oN E"X,b.l.'I\ -= _.::c~~ "P'«'oJ,~ ::: S 3~ o~Mr "'; _ -""~~,. ~z, 3 ~o .. e "" § 0 ;; ./:;:;tJ "~I-_ :.-~ .oue"" "~ff 1'10 = 'IF 9'" _ v_ -:':'. oj) 11111 ) 1 u-'\ ................. ~~ .: " , ...-:, .... , )1 111 \\\\\\,.... C::J"':::- 'II· f"' :IF Wp..: ............ III J ", IJI 11 \\"\\\\\,,, March 13,2008 Jerry Isaksen Zenczak & Partners -Architects 4545 S Union Avenue ste: #200 Tacoma, W A 98409 SUBJECT: Columbia Bank LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF Deae Mr. Isaksen: CITY -:IF RENTON Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) to advise you thilt they have completed their review of the subject project and have issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the enclosed ERC Report and Decision, Part 2, Section B for a list of the Mitigation Measures. Appeals oHhe enviromnental determination must be .filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on March 31, 2008. Appeals must be tIled in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton , 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA '. 98057 .. Appeals to the Examinetare governed by City of Renton MuniCipal Code Section 4-8- 11O.B. Additional infonnation regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the. Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 43D C65 10, If the Environmental Detennination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified, The preceding .infonnation will assist you in planning' for il1lplementati{)n of your . project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if You choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire cIaritlcation of the above, please call11leat(425) 430-7219, For the Environtnental Review Committee, .~ .. A~/?_'~ ROCI~~ . A 'ociate Planner Enclosure cc: Bonnell Family LLC / Owner(s) HugoVanderwaal/ Applicant ------1O--,5-5-S0-u-th-Gra-d-y-w-aY--,--R~e-nt-on-,-w-as-h-in-gton~-98-0""57----'-~~-~ :<i) ThisPBPefo:)ntains 500/0 recyded rnatenBl, 30% postconsumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY JF RENTON Denis' Law, Mayor March 13,2008 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determination Department of Community and Economic Development Alex "Pietsch, Administrator Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on March 10,2008: DETERMINA nON OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Columbia Bank LUA08-01l, SA-A, ECF· 225 SW 7'" Street The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and . Environmental (SEPM Review for the construction of a two-story 8,600 . square foot bank with· assoieated i>a·r\<ing. and landscaping on a 42,019 square foot lot located within the· Commerical Arterial (CA) zoning designation. Access 10 the lite would. be provided via two proposed. aecess roads otT of SW 7th Slre~t. . Appeals of the environmental determination mllst be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on March 31, 2008. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Rentori; toSS South Grady Way,Renton; WA 98057 .. Appeals to the Ex·aminer are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code· Section 4-8-11O.B, Additional information regarding the appeaf process may beobtained from the RenionCity Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510, .. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7219, For the Environmental Review Committee, ~~~ Roc Ie Timmons . M ,,,,,,PI,,",, Enclosure cc: King Courity Wastewater Treatment Division WDFW, Stewart Reinbold David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Karen Walter, Fislieries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Melissa Calvert, Mllckleshoot Cultural ResolircesPrOgrani US Army Ccrp. of Engineers ~ .. Stephanie Kramer, Office of Archaeology & Historic. Preservation n. __ .;,. ~ ~. ~ ~ -:-----,.--"----.1-05-5-S-ou.:..th-G-rc:-ady-'---W-ay~-R-e-n...:to::..n,-w-as-h-in-gt-o-n-9-80-5-7---~--R E N TON . ~ -_. AHEAI) OF THE. <;"URVE \:%I. This papercontains 50% recycled material; 30% ~tconsur:ner CITY OF RENTON "- DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA08-011, SA-A. ECF APPLICANT: Columbia Bank PROJECT NAME: Columbia Bank DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a two-story 8.600 square foot bank with assoicated parking and landscaping on a 42.019 square foot lot located within the Commerical Arterial (CA) zoning designation. Access to the site would be provided via two proposed access roads off of SW 7th Street. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: 225 SW 7th Street The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1. The applicant shall be required to provide Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume II of the most recent Department of Ecology Stormwater Man'agement Manual. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits ' 2, Should evidence of a historic site be found during site development •. work shall be stopped and the applicant shall submit an arChaeological resource survey of the Site. This survey shall conform to. the requirements and st;mdardsofthe Washington State Offic;e of Archaeology and Historic Preservation and must be conducted under the oncsitesupervision of a state-approved archaeologist. Work shall recommence when approval is received from the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. 3. The applicant shall. pay a transportation impact fee of $75.00 for each new weekday trip attributable to the project (estimated to be $42,973.50.) The fee would be required to be paid prior to.the issuance of building permits. . . 4. The applicant shall paya Fire Mitigation Fee, prior to issuance of the building permit. The fee. at $0.52 per net square foot of new building area, has been estimated to be $4,472.00. ERe MJtigation Measures. ·Page1ofl. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED ADVISORY NOTES & CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF APPLICANT: Columbia Bank PROJECT NAME: Columbia Bank DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a two-story 8,600 square foot bank with assoicated parking and landscaping on a 42,019 square foot lot located within the Commerical Arterial (CA) zoning designation. Access to the site would be provided via two proposed access roads off of SW 7th Street. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: 225 SW 7th Street The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division Advisory Notes to Applicant: The fol/owing notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. ADVISORY NOTES: Planning: 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at'any time if complaints are received. 2. Within thirty (30) days of camp Jet ion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseedor plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where 'no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, Or plastic covering as specified in the current King CountySurface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by.the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of e(lch year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work. is reqlJiredprior to final inspection' and approval of the permit. 3 .. Commercial, multi-family, new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'ciock (8:00)p.m., Monday through Fric:tay. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. . 4. All landscaping shall be irrigated by an approved irrigation system prior to final occupancy permits. Water: 1. Water System Development Charges will be based on the size of new water meter(s). See Fee Sheet. This fee is payable at the time the utility construction permit is issued. Credit will be given for any existing water meters. 2. Preliminary fire flow requirement is 2,750 gpm. All new construction must have fire hydrants capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 gpm. Three hydrants will be required to serve this site. One hydrant is required within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants are required to be within 300 feetof the nearest corners of the building. ERG Advisory Notes Page 1 of3 3. Existing hydrants approved to be counted as fire protection shall be retrofitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting if not already installed. Note on plan if required. Show locations of all eXisting hydrants. 4. Awater main extension is required on site. 5. A fire sprinkler system is not required at this time. 6. Landscape irrigation system will require a separate permit for the irrigation meter and approved backflow device is required to be installed. A plumbing permit will be required. Sanitary Sewer: 1. Sewer System Development Charges will be based on the size of new water meter(s). See Fee Sheet. This fee is payable at the time the utility construction permit is issued, Credit will be given for any existing water meters. Surface Water: 1. Surface Water System Development Charges are based on a rate of $0.405 x the total square feet of the new impervious surface area of the .site. Payment of fees will be required prior to issuance of building permit. 2. A preliminary drainage plan and drainage report was submitted with the site plan application. The report addresses detention and water quality requirements as outlined in the 1990 King County Surface Water Manual. Preliminary calculations show detention willnofbe required however water quality treatment will be required, 3. Separate structural plans will be required to be submitted for review and ClPproval under a building permit for the proposed underground val;llts .. Special inspection from the bl;lildiilg department will be required. 4. Roof drains are required to be tight lined to the storm system 5. Erosion control shall comply With Department of Ecology's moslcurrentStormwater Management Manual. Transportation: r. No street improvements are required Miscellaneous: 1. Construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. 2. Haul hours shall be restricted to8:30a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in. advance by the Development Services Division. 3. Any rockeries or retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height to be built during construction of utilities requires a separate building permit. 4. Separate permits and fees for side sewer, domestic water meter, landscape irrigation meter, and any backflow devices will be required. . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Either the site plan be revised to show five stacking spaces for each drive through lane Or the applicant . shall submit written request prior to the issuance of a building permit requesting a modification allowing for a reduction of the stacking spaces less than the five spaces required for each drive through lane, The modification request shall address all the criteria outlined in RMC 4-9,250D. ERG AOvlsory Notes Page 20f 3 . 2. Prior to building permit approval, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan to the Development Services project manager depicting the location, size, and screening for refuse and recyclable material including 43 square feet of recyclable deposit areas and 86 square feet of refuse deposit areas on the project site. 3. A lighting plah shall be submitted with the building permit application for review and approval by the Development Services Division project manager. ERC Advisory Notes CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF APPLICANT: Columbia Bank PROJECT NAME: Columbia Bank DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a two-story 8,600 square foot bank with assoicated parking and landscaping on a 42,019 square foot lot located within the Commerical Arterial (CA) zoning designation, Access to the site would be provided via two proposed access roads off of SW 7th Street. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: 225 SW 7th Street The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on March 31, 2008, Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 O.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: March 15, 2008 DATE OF DECISION: March 10,2008 SIGNATURES: cf~ h\~t erry Igas Iyama, miniS ra or ~h ~ 'O~ Date Community Services ERC REPORT & DECISION ERe MEETING DATE: Project Name: Applicant: Contact: File Number: Project Manager: Project Summary: City of Renton Department of Community and Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT & ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE DECISION March 10, 2008 Columbia Bank BOlUlell Family LLC; 10047 Main Street, Suite 509; Bellevue, W A 98004 Columbia Bank; 5210 74th St W Ste# B; Lakewood, W A 98499 Jerry Isaksen; Zenczak & Partners; 4545 S. Union, Suite 200; Tacoma, W A 98409 LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a two-story 8,600 square foot bank with assoicated parking and landscaping on a 42,019 square commercial pad located within the Commerieai Arterial (CA) zoning designation. Access to the site would be provided via two existing curb cuts off of SW 7th Street. --------------------~------ Project Location: Exist. Bldg. Area SF: 225 SW 7'h Street N/A 42,019 sf SITE IY/30S90fH Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross): 1923059072:iOt-:~ ~r--------... fl." "*,5 n~ 5,600 sf 8,600 sf ,~ 92JV59053 Renton ai' ~ 19",.JvtMfjtit! ~, 11.1230#9074 !j ,s,~:L~'~'t {j:"'YrH Proj eet Location Map ERe & Site Plan Review Report 08-011 City of Renton DCED COLUMBIA BANK Adrninislralire Site Plan Review & EnvirOl ltal Review Committee Staff Report LUA08-0ll, SA-A, ECF Report ofMareh 10,2008 Page 2 of 11 II PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION I BACKGROUND The proposed project, a Columbia Bank building, would be sited on a vacant commercial pad on the southwest portion of an existing site. The property fronts SE 7'h Street. The site is currently developed with two restaurants, Billy McHales and Jimmy Mac's, to the east of the proposed project's commercial pad. Wal-Mart is on the property abutting to the south. Lind Plaza, a warehouse and office space, is located on the property abutting to the west. The Renton School District Administration building is located across SE 7'h Street to the north. The property is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA) and within the Employment Area Valley Comprehensive Plan designation. Banking facilities and drive in! drive through retail are allowed uses in the CA zone. The surrounding zoning designations include Commercial Arterial (CA) and Medium Industrial (1M). The site was previously prepared as a commercial pad as part of the Bonnell Property Proposed Retail project. The proposed project area is predominately gravel surfaced with areas of existing concrete curb and sidewalks along SE 7'h Street. The proposed two story building would be located in the center of the commercial building pad west of the existing structures on site at a 45 degree angle. The proposed structure would be located at the existing grade, therefore no significant grade changes would be required. Some excavation of existing soil would be necessary at the building location. The volume of the cut would be approximately 330 cubic yards and the fill would be existing gravel. A total of 37, including 2 accessible, parking spaces are proposed on site within surface parking areas located along the west and east sides of the building. The amount of impervious area, currently used for surface parking, would be reduced with this project from 38,000 square feet to 30,680 square feet. New landscaping is proposed around the perimeter of the commercial pad and within the surface parking lots. Access would be gained from two existing curb cuts along SW 7'h Street east and west of the commercial pad. A pedestrian walkway would connect the main building entrance to the existing public sidewalk on the south side of SW 7'h Street and to an internal pedestrian system that located on the abutting property to the south, Wal-Mart. The proposed building, approximately 8,600 gross square feet in area with 5,600 square feet on the ground floor, would serve as the Renton Branch of Columbia State Bank. The building is proposed to front an internal road to the cast. The height to the top of the roof on the northeast elevation would be 34 feet and 3 inches in height at the tallest point and the exterior will be comprised mostly of stucco, brick, glass and metal materials. Proposed trash and recycling containers would be within screened enclosures located along SW 7th Street on the northwest comer of the site. All landscaped areas would be irrigated with an underground, automated irrigation system. The site has no existing landscaping or vegetation. The proposed landscape plan includes a 10 foot landscape strip along SW 7th Street and landscaping within surface parking areas. There are no known critical areas on or near the site. II PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts li'Oln the rroposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Issue a DNS-M with a 14-day Appeal Period. B. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall be required to provide Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume II of the most recent Department of Ecology Storrnwater Management Manual. ERC & Site Plan Review Report 08-0 I I City ~r Renton DCED COLUMBIA BANK Report of March 10, 2008 Administmtil'e Site Plan Review & Enviro lIai Review Committee StajJReport LUA08-011, SA-A, BCF Page 3 of II This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits 2. Should evidence of a historic site be found during site development, work shall be stopped and the applicant shall submit an archaeological resource survey of the site. This survey shall conform to the requirements and standards ofthe Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation and must be conducted under the on-site supervision ofa state-approved archaeologist. Work shall recommence when approval is reccivcdlrom the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. 3. The applicant shall pay a transportation impact fee of$75.00 for each new weekday trip attributable to the project (estimated to be $42,973.50.) The fee would be required to be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall pay a Fire Mitigation Fee, prior to issuance of the building permit. The fee, at $0.52 per net square foot of new building area, has been estimated to be $4,472.00. C. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed hv v{{rioas City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified {{nd addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Stat/reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1. Earth Impacts: The site is nearly level with slopes of I percent or less. Compact fill, gravel asphalt, are within the top 24 inches of grade. Mixed and sandy silt tIll is below the gravel asphalt up to approximately 40 inches. There is no evidence of instability. The applicant proposes to excavate approximately 330 cubic yards and the fill would be existing gravel. Following development impervious surface coverage will be approximately 75%. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation r~commcndcd. Nexus: Not applicable. 2. Air Impacts: There would be temporary negative impa~ts to air quality caused by dust and equipment exhaust during site and building construction. Following construction, exhaust from automobiles would be expected. Such emissions are controlled by state and federal regulations. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation recommended. Nexus: Not applicable 3. Water a. Storm Water Impacts: The project site is located within the Black River sub-basin of the Duwamish-Green River Drainage Basin. The applicant submitted a '"Technical Information Report," by AHBL, Inc. (dated November 2007) as part of the application materials. The proposed project would result in removal of 38,000 square foot gravel commercial pad. It would be replaced with a new structure, surface parking stalls, walkways, and new landscaped areas. According to the Drainage Report, there would be no increase in impervious area. Existing stormwater runoff from the site Ilows towards multiple existing catch basins where it is collected and discharged to the existing stonnwater conveyance system. The majority of the project site is direct discharged to the public conveyance system located in SW 7th Street. A portion of the existing runoff is conveyed to an existing bioswale west of the project site. The bioswale provides treatment prior to the runoff being discharged to the existing storm system in SW 7th Street. ERC & Site Plan Review Report 08-011 City of Renton DCED COLUMBIA BANK Report of MaTch 10, 2008 Administrative 5J'ite Plan Review & Enviro rtal Review Commillee Staff Report LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF Page 4 of 11 Because the project would increase the impervious surface by more than 5,000 square feet subject to vehicular traffic, modifications are needed to comply with the 1990 King County Snrface Water Design Mannal for water quality and detention. Water quality is proposed to be provided through the combination of proposed storm filters and the existing bioswale west of the project site. Catch basins will also be added. Staff recommends that a temporary erosion control plan be submitted that complies with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements as outline in Volume II of the most recent edition ofthe Stormwater Management Manual. The plan must be approved by the Development Services Division prior to issuance of the building permit. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall be required to provide Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume II of the most recent Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance o[ building pennits. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations 4. Historic and Cultural Preservation Impacts: It is possible that archaeological m1ifacts or a historic site could be encountered during project construction. This is due to the site's proximity to former archaeological discoveries. Should evidence ofa historic site be found during site development, work shall immediately cease and the Washington State of Archaeology and Historic Preservation shall be contacted at (360) 586-3065. A survey shall be submitted that conforms to the requirements and standards o[the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation and must be conducted under the on-site supervision of a state-approved archaeologist. [n the event that cultural artifacts are found, work cannot recommence until approval is received from the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. Mitigation Measures: Should evidence of a historic site be found during site development, work shall be stopped and the applicant shall submit an archaeological resource survey of the site. This survey shall conform to the requirements and standards of the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation and must be conducted under the Oil-site supervision of a state-approved archaeologist. Work shall recommence when approval is received from the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations 5. Transportation Impacts: The project would be accessed, by means of existing curb cuts, from SW 7th Street, designated a Minor Arterial on the City of Renton A11erials Map. No street improvements would be required for this project. Transportation impact fees would be assessed for the project at the rate of $75.00 per each new weekday trip (estimated at 572.98 trips; International Transportation Engineer -Drive-In Bank Use, estimated to be 572.98 trips for every 1,000 square feet of building area). The estimated Transportation Impact fee would be 42,973.50 Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay a transportation impact fee of$75.00 for each new trip, estimated to be $42,973.50. The fee would be required to be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. Nexus: Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution 3100; Ordinance 4489; SEPA 6. Fire & Police Impacts: The Fire Prevention Bureau and the Police Department have indicated they have the ability to provide service to the project provided required improvements are made and a Fire Impact Fee is assessed. The fee, at $0.52 per net square foot of new building area, has been estimated to be $4,472.00. ERC & Site Plan Review Report 08-011 City of Renton DCED COLUMBIA BANK Administrati\'e Site Plan Review & Enviro ltal Review Committee Staff Report LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF Report of March 10,2008 Page 5 of 11 Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay a Fire Mitigation Fee, prior to issuance ofthe building permit. The fee, at $0.52 per net square foot of new building area, has been estimated to be $4,472.00. Nexus: Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution 2895. SEPA D. Comments of Reviewing Departments The proposal has been circulated to City Depaltment and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or "Advisory Notes to Applicant." ,/ Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may be attached to this report. PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION -REPORT & DECISION This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action B. C. xx Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade & Fi I i Administrative Code Determination Exhibits Exhibit I Aerial Photograph Exhibit 2 Zoning Map Exhibit 3 Site Plan Exhibit 4 Landscape Plan Exhibit 5 First Level Floor Plan Exhibit 6 Second Level Floor Plan Exhibit 7 Exterior Elevations Staff Review Comments Representatives from various City departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the appropriate recommendations have been incorporated into this report. D. Consistency with Site Development Plan Review Criteria The Site Development Plan Review Criteria set forth in Section 4-9-200 of the Renton Municipal Code forms the basis ofthe Site Plan Review, as f()llows: 1. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation for the site is Employment Area -Valley (EA- V). The Community Design section of the plan otfers guidance for new structures. The following Comprehensive Plan objectives and policies of the Land Use and Community Design Elements are applicable to the proposal: ERC & Site Plan Review Report 08-011 City of Renton DCED COLUMBIA BANK Report of March 10,2008 Admini.'ilrative Sire Plan Review & Enviro Ital Review Committee Staff Report LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF Page 6 of 11 Objective LU-AAAA: Provide for a mix of employment-based uses, including commercial, office, and industrial development to supp0l1 the economic development of the City of Renton. ,/ Policy Objective Met I i Not Met Policy LU-444: Develop the Green River Valley (,The Valley") and the Black River Valley (located between Sunset Blvd and SW Grady Way) areas as a place for a range and variety of commercial, office, and industrial uses. ,/ Policy Objective Met I I Not Met Policy LU-447: Developments should be encouraged to achieve greater efficiency in site utilization and result in benefits to users with techniques including: 1) Shared facilities such as parking and site access, recreation facilities ad amenities; 2) An improved ability to serve development with transit by centralizing transit stops; 3) An opportunity to provide support services (e.g. copy center, coffee shop, lunch facilities or express mail services) for nearhy development that otherwise might not exist. ,/ Policy Objective Met Not Met Policy LU-457: Site design for office uscs and commercial and mixed-use developments should consider ways of improving transit ridership through siting, location of pedestrian amenities, walkways, parking etc. ,/ Policy Objective Met Not Met Policy LU-459: New development, or site redevelopment, should conform to development standards that include scale of building, building fayade treatment to reduce perception of bulk, relationship between buildings, and landscaping. ,/ Policy Objective Met o Not Met 2. Conformance with existing land 1I.\'e regulations; The subject site is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA). The purpose of the CA zone is to evolve from "strip commercial" linear business districts to business areas characterized by enhanced site planning, incorporating efficient parking lot design, coordinated access, amenities and boulevard treatment. The CA zone provides a for a wide variety of indoor and outdoor retail sales and services. A banking facility with drive-in!drive-trough as an accessory service to the bariking facility is an outright permitted use within the CA zone. Lot Coverage -The CA zoning designmion allows a maximum building coverage of 65 percent of the site area. The proposed building footprint of 5,600 square feet on the 42,019 square foot commercial building pad results in a building lot coverage of 13.3 percent. The proposed barik complies with the development standard for lot coverage. Setbacks -The CA zoning designation would require a minimum front yard setback of 10 feet which may be reduced to zero feet trough the site plan development review process. No other side or rear setbacks are required. The proposed building would be setback from the front property line approximately 26 feet. A 16 foot and 9 inch rear yard setback is proposed from the south property line and a 110 foot side yard setback is proposed from the west property line. As proposed, the project complies with the required CA zoning setbacks prescribed by City Code. Landscaping -The CA zone requires a I O-foot landscape strip along the street frontage, except where reduced through the site plan development review process. A conceptual landscaping plan was submitted as part of the application materials. The landscape plan proposes a 10 foot landscape strip along SW 7th Street. The landscape plan also proposes a tree planting plan, the proposed tree species largely consist of Sweetgum, Weeping Alaska Cedar, Flowering Pear, and Thundercould Plum. ERC & Site Plan Review Report (JI!-(J 11 City of Renton DCED COLUMBIA BANK Report of March 10, 2008 Adminislratil'(;, Site Plan Review & EnvirOi Ital Review Committee Staff Report LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF Page 7 of II Within the proposed surface parking lot, 15 square feet of landscaping per parking space would be required for parking lots with 15-50 parking stalls. Based on the proposal for 37 surface parking stalls, a minimum of 555 square feet of landscaping would be required within the surface parking areas. The submitted landscape analysis indicates that a total of 11,340 square feet of landscaping would be provided. As proposed the landscaping would exceed the minimum requirement. Underground sprinkler systems arc required to be installed and maintained for all landscaped areas. The sprinkler system shall provide full water coverage of the planted areas specified on the plan. A detailed landscape plan and irrigation plan will need to be submitted at the time of building permit reVIew. Height -The CA zone allows a maximum building height of 50 feel. The tallest point of the building would be the roof, which would have a height of 34 feet and 3 inches. The gabled roof would be standing seam metal. Parking/Circulation -The parking regulations require a specific number of off-street parking stalls be provided based on the amount of square footage dedicated to certain uses. The parking ratio for the proposed bank use is a minimum of 4 spaces to a maximum of 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. The proposed facility would include 8,600 square feet of banking space which requires a minimum of 35 parking spaces and would be pelmitted a maximum of 43 parking spaces. The proposed parking area would have a total of 37 parking spaces. The bank is proposing to locate three customer drive through lanes on the northwest side of the building. Queuing should allow for a minimum of five vehicles per window to provide adequate space to handle peak business demands. It does not appear that stacking spaces for the drive in/drive thru retail portion of the project meet the requirements. The lanes appear to have the possibility to obstruct the vehicular circulation pattern during peak business demands. Where practical difficulties exist, the applicant may request a modification from these standards. The modification request shall be submitted in writing and comply with the criteria outlined in RMC 4-9-2500. Statf recommends as a condition of approval that either the site plan be revised to show five stacking spaces for each drive through lane or the applicant shall submit written request prior to the issuance of a building permit requesting a modification allowing for a reduction of the stacking spaces less than the five spaces required for each drive through lane. The parking conforms to the minimum requirements for drive aisle and parking stall dimensions and the provision of ADA accessible parking stalls for surface lots. Refuse and Recyclable Deposit Areas -The City's refuse and recyclable standards for a retail development require a minimum of 5 square feet per every 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area for recyclable deposit areas and a minimum of 10 square feet per 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area for refuse deposit areas. Based on the proposed gross floor area of 8,600 square feet for the new building a minimum of 43 square feet of recyclable deposit areas would be required and a minimum of 86 square feet of refuse deposit areas would be required. The approximate location of the refuse and recyclable areas were shown on the submitted site plan, and would be located at the northwest comer of the site along SW 7'10 Street and screened from view of the surrounding properties. No areas of the refuse and recyclable areas were noted in the submittal materials. Therefore, staff recommends as a condition of approval that a revised site plan be submitted with the building permit application including a minimum of 43 square feet of recyclable deposit areas and 86 square feet of refuse deposit areas on the project site. Signage -Proposed signage was not reviewed as part of the Site Plan Review. Signage will be reviewed under a separate pem1it. 3. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; City staff does not anticipate any adverse impact on surrounding properties and uses. The site is currently developed with two restaurants, Hilly McHales and Jimmy Mac's, to the east of the proposed project's commercial pad. Lind Plaza, a warehouse and office space, is located on the property abutting to the west and is zoned Medium industrial (IM). Wal-Mart is on the property ERe & Site Plan Review Report 08-011 City of Renton DCED COLUMBIA BANK Report ofMareh 10,2008 Administratire S'ite Plan Review & Enviro ltal Review Committee Staff Report LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF Page 8 of 11 abutting to the south and the Renton School District Administration building is located across SE 7th Street to the north, both parcels are also zoned Commercial Arterial (CAl. The proposed banking use is anticipated to be compatible with future surrounding uses as permitted in the CA and 1M zones. The building is sited to the northwest comer ofthe lot at a 45 degree angle to provide visibility from SW 7th Street and Rainier Ave South. The building will meet all required setbacks from property lines and will provide more than the eode requires for a side and rear setback along the southern and western property line. The bank's vault along with the customer drive through lanes are located on the northwest elevation and mainly appears as a blank wall from SW 7'h Street and would have a negative aesthetic impact on the ncighboring properties to the north. According to code, parking lot lighting fixtures are to be non-glare and mounted no more than 25 feet above the ground. This is to help minimize the impact onto abutting properties and on-site buildings. 4. Mitigation of impacts of the propo,ed site plan to the site; The scale, height and bulk of the proposed building is appropriate for the site, and is anticipated to be architecturally compatible with the tilture development in the project vicinity. The site is 42,019 square feet and would have a building lot coverage of 13.3 percent of the site. The proposal would decrease the impervious surface on the site with the addition of landscaping areas. Parking is proposed along the north. east and west sides of the building within surfaee parking lots. A pedestrian connection would be provided to connect the main entry of the building to the publie sidewalk along SW 7th Street. The building is placed at 45 degree angle on the site therefore the northeast elevation, the most prominent elevation of the building. would be the most visible to traffic heading west on SW 7th Street. The walk-in customer entrance would be on the east comer, facing the proposed parking lot the east. The northeast elevation also exhibits several windows, horizontal and vertical modulation to break up the scale and bulk of the building. The bank is proposing to locate three customer drive- through lanes on the northwest elevation. A teller window and covered area with the vacuum air tubes would also be on the northwcst elevation along with a queue area for vehicles. As proposed, few windows would be provided on this fa,ade. This elevation would be most visible to traffic heading east on SW 7'h Street. The tallest point of the two story building would be the metal panel roof, which would have a height of 34 feet and 3 inches. Exterior building materials mainly consist of an off white stucco system, and a brick base favade. The brick hase far;ade is used on the bottom third of the first story to ground the building. The use of aluminum windows and a metal gabled roof system adds to the architectural interest of the building. 5. Conservation of area-wide prOper~lj values; The proposed development is expected to conserve and possibly increase property values in the vicinity of the site. The development of the site provides improvements to infrastructure, landscaping, lighting and additional employment opportunities. 6. Safety and efficiency of vehicle {(nd pedestrian circulation; Primary access to the site is proposed via existing curb cuts along SW 7'" Street. The site development would include 37 parking stalls within the surface lot, which complies with the parking requirements for the proposed use. A pedestrian walkway is proposed from the sidewalk, located along SW 7 'h Street, to the eastem far;ade of the building. The bank is proposing to locate three customer drive through lanes on the northwest side of the building. It does not appear that stacking spaces for the drive in/drive thru retail portion of the project meet the requirements. StatT has recommended as a condition of approval that either the site plan be revised to show five stacking spaces for each drive through lane or the applicant shall submit ERC & Site Plan Review Report 08-0 J J City qfRenton DCED COLUMBIA BANK Administrativc Site Plan Review & Enviro ltal Review Committee Staff Report LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF Report of March 10, 2008 Page 9 of 11 written request prior to the issuance of a building pennit requesting a modification allowing for a reduction of the stacking spaces less than the five spaces required for each drive through lane. 7. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; The proposed development is not anticipated to generate any hannful or unhealthy conditions. There would be noise impacts of increased traffic and activity that are nonnally associated with a retail development. 8. Availability of public services alldfacilities to accommodate the proposed use; Utility services would be provided by the City of Renton for water, sanitary sewer, and surface water control 9. Prevention of neighborhood deterioratioll and blight; No deterioration or blight is expected to occur as a result of this proposal. As long as developmentsO standards are maintained, the development would be compatible with the existing neighborhood, and constitute a substantial investment in the community. E. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: I) Request: The Applicant has requested Environmental Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval for the Columbia Bank building, LUA 08-0 II, SA-A, ECF. 2) Environmental Review: The City's Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has reviewed the proposal and issued a detenmination of' non-significance-mitigated (DNS-M) and imposed four mitigation measures on March 10, 2008. 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's Site Plan Review application complies with the requirements for infonmation necessary for site plan review. The applicant's plans are entered as Exhibits No. 1-7. 5) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and policies for parks and public facilities. 7) Zoning: The Site Plan as presented. complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Commercial Arterial zone provided all conditions of approval are complied with. F. CONCLUSIONS I) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval arc complied with. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and policies for commercial development in the CA Zone, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. 3) The City's Enviromnental Review Committee (ERC) has reviewed the proposal and issued a dctcnmination of non-significance-mitigated (DNS-M) and imposed four mitigation measures. G. DECISION: The site plan for Columbia Bank, Project File No. LUA 08-011, SA-A, ECF is approved subject to the following conditions: I. Either the site plan be revised to show live stacking spaces for each drive through lane or the applicant shall submit written request prior to the issuance of a building permit requesting a modification allowing ERC & Site Plan Review Repart 08-0 II City of Renton DCED COLUMBIA BANK Administratiw' ,)'ile Plan Review & Enviro lIal Review Committee Staff Report LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF Report ofMareh 10,2008 Page 10 of 11 for a reduction of the stacking spaces less than the five spaces required for each drive through lane. The modification request shan address all the criteria outlined in RMC 4-9-250D. 2. Prior to building permit approval, the applicant shan submit a revised site plan to the Development Services project manager depicting the location, size, and screening for refuse and recyclable material including 43 square feet of recyclable deposit areas and 86 square feet of refuse deposit areas on the project site. 3. A lighting plan shan be submitted with the building permit application for review and approval by the Development Services Division project manager. Neil Watts, Development Services Director TRANSMITTED this /dh day of March 2008 to the Applic({lIt/OH"llcriContact: Bonnell Family LLC Columbia 8ank 10047 Main Street, Suite 509 5210 74th St W Ste# B Bellevue, W A 98004 Lakewood, W A 98499 TRANSMITTED this 1011i day a/March 2008 to the P({rlic.~ r?/'Record: No Parties of Record TRANSMITTED this 10 th day a/March 2008 to theji:J//OIl"illg: Larry Meckling, Building Official Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Jan Conklin Carrie Olson Fire Marshal Renton Reporter Decision Date Zenczak & Partners Jerry Isaksen 4545 S. Union, Suite 200 Tacoma, W A 98409 Environmental Determination Anneal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on March 31, 2008(14 days from the date appeal period ends). Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on March 31, 2008 (14 days from the date appeal period ends). Both decisions will become final ifnot appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on March 31, 2008. City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110 governs appeals to the Examiner. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Appeals must be filed in writing, together with the required $75,00 application fee, to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 Sonth Grady Way, Renton, W A 98055. EXPIRATION DATE: Site Plan Approval will cxpire two (2) years from the date of approval. An extension may be requested pursuant to RMC section 4-7 -080.M. ERe & Site Plan Review Report 08-011 City of Renton DCED COLUMBIA BANK AdmillistJ'{[fil'C ,)'ite Plan Review & Enviror ~ntal Review Committee Staff Report LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF Report of March 10, 2008 Page II of 11 AD VISOR Y NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notcs "rc supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action, Becuusr! these notes are provided as ill/ormalioll Of/Il', l/nT £Ire not subject to the appeal process Jor the land llse actions. Planning: t. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between X:JO am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 2. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Altemative l11eaSllr~s sllch as lllulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface \Vater Managelllclll Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1 st and March 31 st or each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 3. Commercial, multi-family, new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hOllrs between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 4. All landscaping shall be irrigated by an appro\'ed irrigation system prior to final occupancy permits. I. Water System Development Charges will be b",ed on the size of new water meter(s). See Fee Sheet. This fee is payable at the time the utility construction permit is issu('d. (r('dit will be given for any existing water meters. 2. Preliminary fire flow requirement is 2,750 gplll. AI! new construction must have fire hydrants capable of delivering a minimum of I ,000 gpm. Three hydrants will be required to serve this site. One hydrant is required within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants are required to be within 300 feet of the nearest corners of the building. 3. Existing hydrants approved to be counted as lire protection shall be retrolitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting if not already installed. Note on plan if required. ShO\v locations of all existing hydrants. 4. A water main extension is required on site. 5. A fire sprinkler system is not required at this time. 6. Landscape irrigation system will require a separate permit for tbe irrigation meter and approved back flow device is required to be installed. A plumbing permit \villlx: required. Saniti.lry Sewer: I. Sewer System Development Charges will be based on the size of new water meter(s). See Fee Sheet This fee is payable at the time the utility construction permit is issued. Credit will be given for any existing water meters. Surface Water: 1. Surface Water System Development Charges are b8sed on a rate of $0.405 x the total square feet of the new impervious surface area of the site. Payment of Ices will be required prior to issuance of building permit. 2. A preliminary drainage plan and drainagL report \vas submitted with the site plan application. The report addresses detention and \vater quality requirements as oUllined in the 1990 King County Surface Water Manual. Preliminary calculations show' detention will not be required hO\\ c\ cr water quality treatment will be required. 3. Separate structural plans \vill be required to be submitted for revie\v and approval under a building permit for the proposed underground vaults. Special inspection rrom the building department will be required. 4. Roof drains arc required to be tight lined to the slorm system 5. Erosion control shall comply with Departml'llt or Ecok'gy's most current Stormwater Management ManuaL Transportation: 1. No street improvements are required Miscellaneous: 1. Construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. 2. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.lll. to YlO p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3. Any rockeries or retaining \)"ralls greater than 4 rect III height to be built during construction of utilities requires a separate building permit. 4. Separate permits and fees for side sewer, clolllcstil' w<l\er meter, landscape irrigation meter, and any back flow devices will be required. ERC & Site Plan Review Report 011-0/ /.doc -Renton Renton City Limits Parcels SCALE 1 : 3,397 200 0 200 400 FEET hltp:llrenlonnetorg/MapGuide/maps/Parcel_mwf 600 N A EXHIBIT 1 Thursday, March 06, 2008 11:44 AM 7f st. 1M 1M 1M oj 0 Cl) ~ Cl) r:n 1M co 1L co sw co co 21st st. , \ CD CD 1L W CA CA li@ R-l co 00 I 1L co SW 23rd St. F EXHIBIT 2 1H H3 • 30 T23N RSE W 112 ~ ZONING >_ton """ """'" o :, TBCIIIIlCAL SBIlVICBB o 12:0 toO G3 19 T23N R5E W 1/2 5319 Z~NING MAP 80('1( .,310 ;;:3;.;,''F4,r.'f5 1'T22N'R4E 6 T22N R5E RI§IDENTI6L ~ Rellource CODllervlltioD g Residential 1 dulac ~ Rellidential " dulac ~ Residential 8 dulac I RHH I Residential llanurllet.ured Homes IIHO I Residential 10 dulac I R+~ I Residential 14 dulac I RH-rl Residential Multi-Family !RH-T I Residential MulU-Family Trad.itiDDlll IRH-U I ResidenUal Multi-FllDlily Urban Cenler- Printed by Print & MaU Services, City of Renton ~ -'16 T23k.'fI5e:~ 371 d~2P, 821 f . :H§ 'H6:'~~,'+iVr ' ... ~T,2aN'F:I5E 2imNJ1!5E 26T~tI~5~>,'" 825:, • .:,~f9;,,;? IS' 33 T23N Ali;, : 610 5T22N R5E VIXED IlSE CENTER ~ Center vm.,e lue-NII Urban Center -North 1 ~C-N21 Urban Center -North 2 QD Cenur Dcnr:Illown· ~ Commereial/Ofti~/Rellidelltial COMYERCU,I o Commercial Arterial- CEQ] Commercial Office- 16":;:17~'\ 35 T23N R5E 833 J7 2T22N A5E INDllSTRJAL W IDdullrial -Heavy ~ IDdullrla1 -Medium o Industrial -Llaht (P> Publici,. <nmed __ Renton Cit.,y Limit. __ Adjacent. Cit.y Limit. _ Book Papa BDUDdar,y 36 ,8 1T2 ~ Commercial Neichhorhood KROll. PAGE • May include OTerlllJ' Diat.riele. See Appendis mapa. FDr additional rerulatiOD.ll in OTerlllJ' Diltrict.a, plealle lIee RIle 4-3. PAGE# INDEX SECTfTOWNlRANIiE ;' I' TTl I STREET J f',' : 1-,. ~ .J sw . 12" W (R) NW COR 1...0 r 1 ~ 12" W (R) , p ;) 8 < i ) ~ ,-""'" WV &: ~-H tl:;J tU216' e WM "'---' ~ . ·:'!Wv , 1:---------' I I --~-------.--"~--------,~~-ii,,~. -, .-----.',--SE!9"10'29"E --=--__ _ r-" :::-::---, -r---' / _. I;> "-I -,--_.;.:.:;-..... - - - - --;="'-=-1 .... -;;; ...... -! mI~,·:. ----.-,----'--' ___ 4C"'""!_4-_' ---~: 0 " .. ,,' C~iI:k, ( m,.,......,...,04--1J.....,-cc-, e""'~ ~.' Y--> ~i ~ ~j ~i :~ , __ "" :;; ti" ..... '>" , I I ! ( f '[ I ~ 17 ttj-)) .. ; / ;:~. ' fw~_ ---He w', 'r :~ r ~ --4-~~~' I ,-- I OJ .--. t~~T""!5 ~ [j1' it r ~ 1----c .... ~' ..{j i -";ll" II ' ~ t-· ~ p <) • .~ i f'j r i 9~' v l , ',jLLJ T "-';: ,'" , " 111 I --•. , , i _-Q., Vi J • ~~ i -o.i~Q~~:; ~~~J\J. "-2'18 ' ----1""-~---... - ~ "I~' II-"""~~=- , I'" < ., ", ' , '~? t ~r J q; :11 '-~N"" .:.y, , /A~ "~zr>;, •• :. I" ~" c) 'v --~ -'-' -:-" . .'" " "--S-' 'I ~ '_.-;> L) tl ' i '~! => i -.-1L J ;' 0/ \ ---"1---_# : ~ ~).~,.,-" -: lee ~3' -j -j :l ....... ~~~ \:.....:1 ~ . ______ ".ow --7"--,~/, > ~ " ,I , , Lw."{,,. " { [ ___ 4C' AJ:;:;C',5 :-ASFI.:!":-\ -:';-f' PH"": """.".. '\' fl:' ,'-_~ 1-4 ~ ,,):,--~, "\\\\., .," ,.,' " "\ \ ~~\'" 'J' ~ ---".t',~i, -~-....> "':--'\' ' /, A'~\I-".,,~:, I t '/ ',' \ "t'-j '';:'' :; L ~_ W llmt 'j 0 -. l\;~:~<~:-\t_ "-".0~ I -1 "".It,' ~ r<1 ~ y H""""'~:' --f( l....-_ 15' ~llILlTv EAS:':~.-I[NY FTR \, ;.';'l.:'~i.---," , \REC. NO (]70~Ol1441.\ ; l\.f--""',~'l,lJ1 : \. -/'.,t\z:,. . ! ~, C:~'\'" (1 'Ot -~_~', , . .o.- _ •• ll _._I~ .. ( •• _ s; '" wv, [31_LY McrlAlCS R:::STAURANT STORY WOOD FRAME o ' !to ;J UL~ u tj. I' I ~ I , I I I \ ' , , , I r" . '-:--r-' .'. • ' I ' ! I : I j , , I ,I! ~ • /1 I'; ~ ''SJ. ..... I,"F' Jt;::: ... ·····~,!l : .. '2ill?'·'\ " '., . ..., '--_, ""',,! . i ' ~:" i '-... ':--,f H "',! . "" • .." '" i :, '. 1 c" "", ! i I [ j , _. ;i! , :1) Wi z' ~I cl :" . ,', . '""'---437.73' ,~---.-:.....-', -~L.,_L;:=;· UTiliTY E<\5FNi::\;Y P~R ---'-, -, __ •• .1 "t.c. f'.0 9/C-:'Cli44t; N8S"45 24' W 4cn 0:'( -_. --."-_ .. .--+- I " cbl\c_ 8 ',_OCK ~-i SLJI: n:NG I I -SITE PLAN EXIDBIT (l) .'-3 I PIIOJ.NO. 2oe-~ - -(I) \ ~ , lLI i Z . j I-~ ~~ Q. ~ dj~ ,U~ , lIJ ~ « 1-" N-j' UJ: :' ZU!i lLIl~ Ii N<C11 • :"']1, ; ~::...:~ ~;' ..(..: ':: ~ z « at """ -~< :>~ ..J~ Offi u: ~ i "."m 01/10/08 """"""" """ "" 01/18/08 ""." 20&2.330 At , f- ; lL.i ilL! ICY' f-i(j) ::r , f- ir-----. I I~ (f) u I 'VTV ·SJ.:)3l.IHO~V ~~I VM'NOJ.N·~·I· I~ SH3Nl.HVd :g >lVZON3Z 7;: }lNV8 VI8Wn,OO I ! ~--, : a) " I II ~I , rol. L :~~~~ . ·1 --.-"--------~~,.- )i ) / , 0 : [ : . , .. j i --... -._-... -----t _, ... ..J .-' :" : ~I ~I .- " II Id~ T ,----.-----... t- .....-......,......, Vl==~~~·-} ~> J -,-- <i,J ( ... : ./ J z ~ II. a:: o g II. C Z o hl II) , '} r: '-', .;C'- -'"-"" ' , -, - " z , <:f t;,:v- .:.J i ! ~~ 1 II ~! ,. , d !~ ~i " , ~~~ , , il i f! , ?~ t~'" ~~ ~gl "' "~ ~;::" 3' l~ I, ~iB .~~ "e "' ~.q ~£ I ) I :I 1 z 0 z ;:: 0 <C > j:::: w ~ ~ w ~ ., 11/ z oJ J- 11/ "-w I-!!l 00 Z < 11/ 0 :r ~I I- :J 0 11/ 00 oJ III I- 00, ~I Irl ~I I i, z z 0 0 j:::: j:::: < < ~I > 11/ oJ 11/ 11/ l-I-00 00 11/ 11/ ~, ~ :r Irl I- :J ~I 0 00 I I I t I "!I ~~ ,I ~ ;1 ."'0 ~ f ;1 ~" ~~~ 'i,' $i ~ ~.~ ,1, t,~:, ~~ n ~ .. ~ .~~ " ." ~~~ ~~ &~ ., , .f 0 M i 'il 0: I,~ '" , f,i i 1: , 0 , •• nii z , m '" \ T ,,), ., n I I;: ! " I C :; d ~ ~J ., ~ Z 0 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM February 29, 2008 Rocale Timmons Jan lilian x 7216 Columbia Bank 225 -SW 7" Street LUA08-011 I have reviewed the application for Columbia Bank located at 225 -SW 7'" Street and have the following comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER SEWER STORM STREETS There is an existing 12-inch water main fronting the site in SW 7'h Street and a 12-inch looped water main on the site. See City drawing W-2236. Available derated fire flow in the area is approximately 5,500 gpm. Pressure available is approximately 75 psi. The proposed project is located in the 196 water pressure zone and is outside an Aquifer Protection Zone. There is a private sewer main on site at the north end of the site. There are existing storm drainage facilities fronting the site in SW 7'h Street. There are street improvements in SW 7'h No additional improvements are required. CODE REOUIREMENTS WATER 1. Water System Development Charges will be based on the size of new water meter(s). See Fee Sheet. This fee is payable at the time the utility construction permit is issued. Credit will be given for any existing water meters. 2. Preliminary fire flow requirement is 2,750 gpm. All new construction must have fire hydrants capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 gpm. Three hydrants will be required to serve this site. One hydrant is required within ISO feet of the building and two additional hydrants are required to be within 300 feet of the nearest comers of the building. 3. Existing hydrants approved to be counted as fire protection shall be retrofitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting if not already installed. Note on plan if required. Show locations of all existing hydrants. 4. A water main extension is required on site. 5. A fire sprinkler system is not required at this time. 6. Landscape irrigation system will require a separate permit for the irrigation meter and approved backflow device is required to be installed. A plumbing permit will be required. Columbia Bank Page 2 of2 February 29, 2008 SANITARY SEWER I. Sewer System Development Charges will be based on the size of new water meter(s). See Fee Sheet. This fee is payable at the lIme the utility construction permit is issued. Credit will be given for any existing water meters. SURFACE WATER I. Surface Water System Development Charges are based on a rate of $0.405 x the total square feet of the new impervious surface area of the site. Payment of fees will be required prior to issuance of building permit. 2. A preliminary drainage plan and drainage report was submitted with the site plan application. The report addresses detention and water quality requirements as outlined in the 1990 King County Surface Water Manual. Preliminary calculations show detention will not be required however water quality treatment will be required. 3. Separate structural plans will be required to be submitted for review and approval under a building permit for the proposed underground vaults. Special inspection from the building department will be required. 4. Roof drains are required to be tight lined to the storm system 5. Erosion control shall comply with Department of Ecology's most current Storrnwater Management Manual. TRANSPORTATION I. No street improvements are required MISCELLANEOUS I. Construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. 2. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3. Any rockeries or retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height to be built during construction of utilities requires a separate building permit. 4. Separate permits and fees for side sewer, domestic water meter, landscape irrigation meter, and any backflow devices will be required. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS I. Traffic mitigation fees are $43,793.00. See attached Mitigation Fee Report. Payment of fees will be required prior to issuance of building permit. 2. Staff recommends a SEPA condition requiring this project to design and comply with Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume II of the latest edition of Stormwater Management Manual. cc: Karen Kit trick 2 City oL ~~nton Department of Planning / Building / Pub/,v •• orks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 29, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 15, 2008 APPLICANT: Columbia State Bank PLANNER: Rocale Timmons ,.... ClfYOFHcNfUr.. PROJECT TITLE: Columbia Bank -Renton PLAN REVIEWER: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 42,019 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): 8,600 square f~~8 2 I LOCATION: 225 SW 7" Street WORK ORDER NO: 77867 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a two-story 8,600 square foot bank with assoicated parking and landscaping on a 42,019 square foot lot located within the Commerical Arterial (CA) zoning designation, Access to the site would be provided via two proposed access roads off of SW 7th Street A, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Ho",ing Air Water , Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals ~ Environmental Health Public Services Energy! , Natural Resources o;f:ggg~::~ B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this appficatio ~particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Date City of nenton Department of Planning I Building I Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 0 f){2()1fI /r. f);:;;1/, COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 29, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 15, 2008 APPLICANT: Columbia State Bank PLANNER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Columbia Bank -Renton PLAN REVIEWER: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 42,019 square feet BUILDING AREA (aross): 8,600 SQuare feet LOCATION: 225 SW 7'h Street I WORK ORDER NO: 77867 PLEASE RETURN TO ROCALE TIMMONS IN DEVELOPMENT PLANNING 6TH FLOOR SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a two-story 8,600 square foot bank with assoicated parking and landscaping on a 42,019 square foot lot located within the Commerical Arterial (CA) zoning designation. Access to the site would be provided via two proposed access roads off of SW 7th Street A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e,g, Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housinq Air Aesthetics Water Liaht/G/are Planfs Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Trans ortatian Enllironmental Health Public SeNices Energy! HistondCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet S, POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C, CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. itP6c- Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DATE: TO: CC: FROM: SUBJECT: FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM 2/26/08 Jan lliian, Plan reviewer Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner David Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshal ~~. LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF Columbia Bank, Admin Site Approval A review of the plans and material as well as on site review of the Columbia Bank project was conducted and completed. The review was conducted for the Administrative Site Approval process. The review of the plans and material as well as the on site review disclosed the following fire comments and concerns that need to be addressed as well as fire code requirements that shall be met. Fire review comments, concerns, code requirements and standards are as follows: 1. The Fire Code Conditions noted in the May 24th, 2007 Pre-Application review meeting are still applicable to this project and shall be met. A copy of those conditions shall accompany this review. 2. HYDRANTS: It appears that there are 4 Existing Hydrants with in the 300-foot range to the front and rear of the building. All 4 existing hydrants shall meet current Renton Fire and Emergency Developmental Standards. Five (5)-inch Storz fittings are required on all main ports. 3. FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS: Roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. 4. FIRE EMERGENCY ACCESS: During construction emergency access shall be maintained throughout the construction, for fire apparatus access. This access shall also be maintained and arranged for Aerial Apparatus access as in accordance with Appendix D, section DI05 of the 2006 International Fire Code. 5. TEMPORARY ADDRESS: During construction a temporary address shall be posted identifying the location of the project for emergency responders to readily and easily identify the site when responding to an emergency. 6. PERMANENT ADDRESS: A permanent address shall be posted as to be easily identifiable from the road access fronting the main entrance to this building. Addressing shall be in compliance with City of Renton Fire Department Developmental Standards. i:\city memos\08 final & prelim rev\lua08-0 11, sa-a, ecf columbia bank admin site plan approval.doc 7. FIRE FLOW: Fire flow requirements shall remain the same and were noted for the most restrictive. However if the 2006 code adoption proposed changes are approved this could lower the fire flow requirement due to Fire Sprinklers being required. 8. FIRE SPRINKLERS: Fire sprinklers will be required if the noted fire flow can not be met or ifthe 2006 proposed 5000 square foot ordinance is approved before this building is in for permits. 9. FIRE ALARM & SPRINKLER PLANS & PERMITS: A separate set of plans and permits shall be required if either or both a Fire Alarm and Fire Sprinkler system is required. 10. FIRE MITIGATION FEES: A Fire Mitigation fee of$.52 per square foot of the building square footage is to be paid at the time of securing the building permits. Please feel free to contact Assistant Fire Marshal, David Pargas at 425-430-7023 if you have and questions or concerns regarding this fire review. i:\city memos\08 final & prelim rev\lua08·011, sa-a, ccf columbia bank admin site plan approval.doc City of "enton Department of Planning / Building / Public Norks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: FEB~II A~Y2.9, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 15, 2008 APPLICANT: Columbia State Bank PLANNER: Rocale Timmons ' I PROJECT TITLE: Columbia Bank -Renton PLAN REVIEWER: Jan lilian F J; R 1 0 '!riM ~vvu SITE AREA: 42,019 square feet BUILDING AREA (qross): 8,600 square feet LOCATION: 225 SW 7'" Street WORK ORDER NO: 77867 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Enviro'rimental (SEPA) Review{or·jrn., construction of a two-story 8,600 square foot bank with assoicated parking and landscaping on a 42,019 square foot lot located within the Commerical Arterial (CA) zoning designation, Access to the site would be provided via two proposed access roads off of SW 7th Street A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Mjnor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earlh Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ?kas~ /Zv,,~~ 47TAC'/"'c! ~a ... " -;; ~j4..5 / A-s-/ Element of the Probable Environment Minor Impacts HousinQ Aesthetics U htJG/are Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet C -'A4t!"#'".I..s . ?//Z~ ~~J/ Probable More Major Information Impacts Necessary We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of nenton Department of Planning / Building / Public Narks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: toDShu.0tl t (1 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 29, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 15,20jJ8_ , .. ~ " ,", . . , APPLICANT: Columbia State Bank PLANNER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Columbia Bank -Renton PLAN REVIEWER: Jan lilian FE';,,: . , ""' ,,~ SITE AREA: 42,019 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): 8,600 squ'lfti /eeb: i llV ISI()N LOCATION: 225 SW 7'h Street WORK ORDER NO: 77867 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a two-story 8,600 square foot bank with assoieated parking and landscaping on a 42,019 square foot lot located within the Commencal Arterial (CA) zoning designation. Access to the site would be provided via two proposed access roads off of SW 7th Street A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable Mo," Environment Minor Major Information Emrironment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Ught/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Trans or/alion Environmental Health Public Services Energy! Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14.000 Feet B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS c We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addilional informalion is n~~erIY assess Ihis proposal. 1-t ~ <::) ~ Signature of Director or Authorizet:R":EIPresenaNe Date Project Name: Project Address: Contact Person: Permit Number: Project Description: Land Use Type: o Residential o Retail o Non-retail Calculation: ... ~ BloOD 100b Columbia State Bank 225 SW 7th Street Columbia State Bank LUA08-011 802 8,600 square foot total, 2 story bank with drive-in lanes Method of Calculation: o ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition o Traffic Study o Other (9121 Drive-in Bank 246.49 trips! 1000sgft sse. AL.'i>O l.o>~\ \j.\6~ f"~O "TlIA ...... ,c. -~"N~ 2\\'9.. BI )I. .'5\ '" 1081.10 loe.1. 10 l' .S~ ~ '57~. Cje. C t:fIb/O 't.l11iWQ ... ,.e.'I"'a) (47"0 ~~ 'Y "T\a.1\,S) Transportation Mitigation Fee: Calculated by: Date of Payment: City of nenton Department of Planning / Building / Publlv Norks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I rM...:u., ,~+i 'iYl COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 29, 2008 • APPLICATION NO: LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 15, 2008 APPLICANT: Columbia State Bank PLANNER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Columbia Bank -Renton PLAN REVIEWER: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 42,019 square leet BUILDING AREA (gross): 8,600 square I~EB 1 8 2~23 LOCATION: 225 SW 7'h Street WORK ORDER NO: 77867 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction 01 a two-story 8,600 square loot bank with assoicated parking and landscaping on a 42,019 square loot lot located within the Commerical Arterial (CA) zoning designation. Access to the site would be provided via two proposed access roads off of SW 7th Street A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable Mo ... Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth lousino Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals -7~ ~, Environmental Health Public Secviees Energyl Natural Resources "i~:gg~~::; B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of nenton Department of Planning I Building I Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~ fbf?h COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 29, 2008 , APPLICATION NO: LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 15, 2008 APPLICANT: Columbia State Bank PLANNER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Columbia Bank -Renton PLAN REVIEWER: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 42,019 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): 8,600 square feet LOCATION: 225 SW 7" Street I WORK ORDER NO: 77867 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a two-story 8,600 square foot bank with assoicated parking and landscaping on a 42,019 square foot lot located within the Commerical Arterial (CA) zoning designation. Access to the site would be provided via two proposed access roads off of SW 7th Street A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable M"", Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals ~ Environmental Health Public SeNices Energy/ Nafural Resources .;~;,; .0;' ;:;'nnnc,", B. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional infor. ation is needed to properly assess this proposal. 0.~O ... .~ . ~;N<fS1 NOTICE OF APPLICA nON AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: February 15, 2008 LAND USE tNMBER: LUA08-011, SA.A, ECF PROJECT NAME: Columbia Sank· Renton PROJECTOESCRIPTION: The appllcaot i. requesting Administratill': Site Plan appmval and fn'"ronmM(,1 (SEPA) Re>,;ew lor the consltllCllon 01 a twoJ.-story 8:600 square foot bank with assoocate<l pamng .n~ I~~~sc"p,ng on ~ 42,019 square loot lot ioc3ted wUI1,n 111 .. Comme"",,1 Arlenal ICA) ;,onong de'lQI1..mn. A""".s Ie I"e Site wou>d be P,..,\I1ded via tw<> propose<! access roads off of SW 7111 StreB! PROJECT lOCAnoN: 225 SW .,.. Street OPTIOt«L DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, IIIImGATED (ONS'''): As tI1e Lead AgenC'(. I"c C,ly ~I Renton has <letemnned lhal • .gnifi<:ant Bnvmnmenlal ,mp"'ds are unll""ly k> rMul lrom tI1e r>'~d project Therefore, ~. permmed undo' !he Flew 43 Z1C 110, i!1e City of Renton Is using the OptioMI DNS·M process to give no!lce that a DNS_ M Islrkel, to be IS.Ued Convnant p<lnod. for til. project and t~e proposed DNS-M are Integrated into ~ Single C0mmont pe<1od, The'e will be nO commit", penod following the issuan"" Dl the Tl".shold Oetermlnabon 01 Non·Slg.",r'Cdnc~_ M't'~l!Od (DNS-M) A 14-d~y appeal "",nod WIU /ollowtl1e isSU30"" rAtlle ONS-M PI"R:MIT APPLICATION DATE: Jan~aFY 31. 200B NOTICE OF CDMPLETI" APPLICATION: F .. broaFY 15, 200a APPLICANTIPROJ!;CT CONTACT P!;RSON: Jerry I .... k<;en. Zenczak & p.rtnen ArchlwclS; Tel: (25:3) 475·03HO; Eml: studl0@3:l"'ala.com Oth.r Permits which may be requIred Roqu •• tHl Studies: Location wher& application may b& .. viowed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW, Zonlng/l.and lJse: EnvironmontalDucumonbthat Evaluate tile Proposed Project: Developmo", Regulations Uaed ForProject Mltlgallan" Environmental (SEPAl Revle .... AdmlnlBtrat!vo Site PI~n Rev,eN ConotnlcUon and Building Pormlts Geotetllnlcal and O",lnage Reports PlanninglBullcllnolPuMlc Wor1<:. Dep~rtmen", De"elopmcnt Servic .. OMolon, Sldh FloDrRenton City HaH. 1055 South Grady Way. ROFlIQn, WA 98057 The subJectSJle .. desiijnaled EmpiaymentAtea Vaney (EA\') on I",~ City or R,,"lOn Co.-np'ehens ..... L..,o Use Map Hnd Comm.m:;'1 Art'''~1 ('-AI on Ibe Ctly'sZoning Map Envi,onmootaIISEPA) ChecklO3l The project ... ,11 be SUbl .... 1 10 !I .. CII'f'S SEPA <>rdi"""",, C0mm"r~,"i Zonl~9 Develo~em StandardS RIo.4C 4·2_12011. and OIhB, ap;>llc"hle code, ac,d regula~oFls as apprnpriai@ Prop<>1l&d Miliga~on Measures: The foUOl'F1ng Mitigation Me ....... , wililikelV be impoSed on the prnPQ$ed project These recommended MiJj~at"'" M ..... ure. 3d""'"" prnJoot Impacts FlO! c""",ed by eXisfug cod ... aod r<>gylabons as CIted aooye. Tne applicant wi/! be reQulrod toptly III" apptOfJnare Transportstion Mitigalion Foo; r"" ap(Jlrcant 'Mil be reQuJred to pay 1M appropriate FP/OI Mitigation F .... ; and Co"""""ta on the abo'.!. "Pplbllon must be submitled in wriIIng to Ro<:at.. Tlmmn .......... I.tanl Planner. Development services Division, 1065 Snuth Grady Way, Renton, WA n051. by G;DQ PM on Febru8/y 29. 2008. II y.:.u havf! questions abo\.( U.s proPOSal. 0/ ""sh to be ""''''' a party Qr record aod recei~e addi!iooalllDlifLCa~on by mail. contacl the Pr<>jecl Manage<. ~ who submits wrII;Ien comments wii automaticany boeo:>me .. party of noconl and will be ""I,road.or any deCISion"" 111" prnJ!!d CONTACT PERSON: Roeal" Timmons., As.s.istant Planner; Tel: 1426) 430_7219; Eml: rtimmol\$@cl.renton.wa.lls PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CAlUNG fOR PROPER FILE IDEHTIFICAnON II y.:.u wou1d like I~ be made a party of record to receive furth~r infurmalion on this proposed project, complete thiS furm and retum to; City of Renton. Development Plan"",]. 1055 So. Grad)' Way, Rentoo, WA 98057. Name/File No Columbia Bank -RentonlLUA08-011, SA-A, ECF MAIl!NG ADDf'!ESS TELEPHONE NO CERTIFICATION I, f/O(c,le /lJ})n1by7J hereby certify that .o=3=-_copies of the above document were posted by me in ...::o.;;L.. conspicuous places or nearby the described pf()Pf'rt)'_~iI'~~"~~!& DA TE:_c.,;J .... I'-/_'5~,I-/_{)_B_: _ CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 15th day of February, 2008, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter, NOA, Environmental Checklist & Site Plan (PMT) documents. This information was sent to: Name Agencies See Attached Surrounding Property Owners -NOA only See Attached Jerry Isaksen Contact Columbia State Bank Applicant Bonnell Family LLC Owner (Signature of Sender): ~1 ~i(.J(' w STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker Representing signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Q ) Ii/De Notary (Print):'--l,,)n,bE.J:.---'-"IJ'~-1::l~~~30._-4~h;z..t!f.;.---:,=# My appointment expires: 0> - \ <:t - \ D Project Name: Columbia Bank -Renton Project Number: LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF template -affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology' Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region' Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv" MS-240 PO Box 33031 0 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp, of Engineers' Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers ' Depart, of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504·7015 KC Dev, & Environmental Serv, Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave, SW Renton, WA 98055·1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher' Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. ' 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer Issaquah, WA 98027 39015 -172"' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office' Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program' 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015172"' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Ms, Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer 201 S, Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR·050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104·3855 Olvmoia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Mr, Micheal E, Nicholson Attn: Mr, Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev, Director 13020 SE 72"' Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032·5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd, 201 South Jackson Street KSC·TR·0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD·01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 981 04·3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities State Department of Ecology Real Estate Services NW Regional Office Title Examiner 3190 160th Avenue SE 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Bellevue, WA 98008·5452 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 Note: lithe Notice 01 Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy 01 the checklist, PMTs, and the notice of application, • template -affidavit of se[\lice by mailing 1823059038 BRIDGE ROBERT 150 SW 7TH ST RENTON WA 98055 1823059211 CCD ENTERPRISES INC 20.SW 7TH ST RENTON WA 98055 1823059252 RADOVICH PROPERTIES L L C 440 SW 7TH ST RENTON WA 98055 1923059027 PIEROTTI LP 707 RAINIER AVE S RENTON WA 98055 1923059035 SOUND FORD INC 750 RAINIER AVE S RENTON WA 98055 1923059048 WAL-MART PROPERTY TAX DEPT 241 SW 7TH ST RENTON WA 98055 1923059058 BONNELL FAMILY L L C 10047 MAIN ST, STE 509 BELLEVUE WA 98004 1923059062 ALEXANDER BROADCASTING COMPANY 955 LIND AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 1923059072 BONNELL FAMILY L L C 225 SW 7TH ST RENTON WA 98055 1923059100 TENNESSEE GROUP L L C MCCLENDON HARDWARE INC. 715 LIND AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 1823059052 BURLINGTON NORTHRN SANTA FE 625 S 4TH ST RENTON WA 98055 1823059212 LITHIA REAL ESTATE INC-ATTN 560 HARDIE AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 1823059253 FACILITIES & OPERATIONS CTR 300 SW 7TH ST RENTON WA 98055 1923059029 BONNELL FAMILY L L C 757 RAINIER AVE S RENTON WA 98055 1923059044 SFP-A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 710 RAINIER AVE S RENTON WA 98055 1923059053 D&C INVESTMENTS LLC 720 RAINIER AVE S RENTON WA 98055 1923059060 PDA L L C 720 LIND AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 1923059064 MCLENDON HARDWARE INC 846 LIND AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 1923059073 BONNELL FAMILY LLC 765 RAINIER AVE S RENTON WA 98055 1823059123 CCD ENTERPRISES INC 621 RAINIER AVE S RENTON WA 98055 1823059251 PUGET SOUND ELECTRICAL AP& 550 SW 7TH ST RENTON WA 98055 1923059017 RA MAC INC 105 SW 7TH ST RENTON WA 98055 1923059030 PREVETTE LYNNE 865 LIND AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 1923059047 T & J LLC DBA RMC 900 LIND AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 1923059056 EASTLAKE INVESTORS 501 SW 7TH ST RENTON WA 98055 1923059061 THORNBERG PRISCILLA J 3323 43RD AVE NE SEATTLE WA 98105 1923059067 LANPHERE PROPERTIES I LLC 858 LIND AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 1923059080 GREENWELL/RENTON L. L.C POBOX 2399 KAILUA KONA HI 96745 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: February 15, 2008 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF PROJECT NAME: Columbia Bank ~ Renton PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a two-story 8,600 square foot bank with assoicated parking and landscaping on a 42,019 square foot lot located within the Commerical Arterial (CA) zoning designation. Access to the site would be provided via two proposed access roads off of SW 7th Street PROJECT LOCATION: 225 SW ih Street OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON·SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS·M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.11 0, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the Issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance- Mitig'ated (DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: January 31, 2008 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: February 15, 2008 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Jerry Isaksen, Zenczak & Partners· Architects; Tel: (253) 475·0380; Eml: studio@Zpaaia.com Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Environmental (SEPA) Review. Administrative Site Plan Review Construction and Building Permits Geotechnical and Drainage Reports Planning/Building/Public Works Department, Development Services Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall. 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 N/A The subject site is designated Employment Area Valley (EAV) on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Commercial Arterial (CA) on the City's Zoning Map Environmental (SEPA) Checklist The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, Commercial Zoning Development Standards RMC 4-2-120A and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as Cited above. The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Transportation Mitigation Fee; The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee; and Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rocale Timmons, Assistant Planner, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on February 29, 2008. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Rocale Timmons, Assistant Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7219; Eml: rtimmons@ci,renton.wa.us I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I SITE H'2~9100 i {GJ'~]~~"!I1:' Renton 19230S9029 1B.2305Q211 '··i L " .-" f92~1~. \ -~-~ If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: Columbia Bank -Renton/LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: Denis Law, Mayor February 15, 2008 Jerry Isaksen Zenczak & Partners -Architects 4545 S Union Avenue #200 Tacoma, W A 98409 Subject: Columbia Bank -Renton LUA08-011, SA-A, ECF Dear Mr. Isaksen: CIT1-OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject" application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on March 10, 2008. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information IS required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7219 if you have any questions. Sincerely, '-f?~~ , ~t,~le Timmons " . " Nssistant Planner ce: Bonnell Family LLC / Owner Columbia State Bank / Applicant ~--------~----------~~"~"NTON 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98057 * This-paper contains 50% recyaed r:nateri8I, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF' THE CURVE " ~., ... --------------"'" City of Renton ~ .r.',f( PIANn\NG LAND USE PERMIT : .. , .. :.'\Ork'c'ft'Nl0~\ ,"-;,:~: '.,: Or \. \~~ 3 \ 11J1J~ MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: Bonnell Family LLC PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Columbia Bank -Renton ADDRESS: 10047 Main Street, Suite 509 PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 225 SW 7th; Renton, WA 98057 CITY: Bellevue, WA ZIP: 98004 TELEPHONE NUMBER: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): Parcel # 1923059072 APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: Columbia State Bank ~o \/arlUCK fIloal EXISTING LAND USE(S): Unimproved gravel lot COMPANY (if applicable): Columbia Bank PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Office/Retail Banking ADDRESS: 1",6, 8o~ 2~ alii EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: EAV CITYj tU'e t. Ta'9FRS, WA ZIP: S~~I nCJ, q PROPOSED CDMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): N/A TELEPHONE NUMBER (253) 396-6900 EXISTING ZONING: CA CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): N/A NAME: Jerry Isaksen SITE AREA (in square feet): 42,019 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE COMPANY (if applicable): Zenczak & Partners -Architects DEDICATED: N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: ADDRESS: 4545 South Union Avenue, Suite 200 NJA PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY: Tacoma, WA ZIP: 98409 ACRE (if applicable): N/A NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): N/A TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: (253) 475-0380 studio@zpaaia_com NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): N/A Q:web/pw/devserv/fonns/planning/masterapp.doc 01110/08 · ' ,. ,. , P IJECT INFORMATION (coni led) NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: $1,200,000 N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS (if applicable): 8,600 s.f. o FLOOD HAZARD AREA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A o GEOLOGIC HAZARD NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if o HABITAT CONSERVATION applicable): o SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): 20 o WETLANDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ___ sq. ft. ___ sq. ft. ___ sq. ft. ___ sq. ft. ___ sq. ft. (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information Included) SITUATE IN THE NW QUARTER OF SECTION ~, TOWNSHIP 23N, RANGE 5E, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. SPR 3. 2. I{nv'/(mrnen-tnl J2oJIW\IJ 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ 3660 AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) --'~ ~. -S»"I":""'-~ , decl.re th.t I .m (please check one) _ the ellrrent owner 01 the property involved in this application or the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. (Sign.ture of Owner/Represent.tive) Q:web/pw/devserv/fonns/pianning/masterapp,doc I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/h",e''''/t''"he'''ir""lr",ee-:-.-:-n'''''d-vo"''lu-n':'"ta-ry-a-ct",lo",r''''the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. N ta Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) ,t(:;/l ~------ My .ppointment expires: /1 -J / -1<2 2 01110/08 Pre-application meeting for the Columbia Bank 225-235 Southwest 7th Street PRE07-039 City of Renton Development Services Division May 24,2007 Contact information Planner: Elizabeth Higgins, AICP, (425) 430-7382 Public Works Plan Reviewer: Jan lilian, (425) 430-7216 Fire Prevention Reviewer: Jim Gray (425) 430-7023 Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell, (425) 430-7290 JAN 3 1 2008 RECEiVeD Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects and contractors who work on the project. Pre-screening: When you have the project ready for submittal, have it pre-screened before making all of the required copies. The pre-application meeting is informal and non-binding. The comments provided on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review. The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly amended and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of project submittal. The information contained in this summary is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Public Works Administrator, and City Council). DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM May 8, 2007 Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner J IA James Gray, Assistant Fire Marsha Jiij' Columbia Bank, SW 7th St. . ~W/fJA1i7fN;~.~-r:P,)i ~ ~ Fire Department Comments: ~ ~ ~r"'~~ 1. The preliminary fire flow i 75 GPM, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and two additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. 2. A fire mitigation fee of$4,472.00 is required based on $.52 per square foot of the building square footage. 3. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of systems fire alarm if installed. 4. Fire department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the , building exterior. ~ ttN.J 't PfJ. 01 ~ Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. i:lcolurnbi.bank.doc TO: FROM: DATE: Elizabeth Higgins Jan lllian May 23, 2007 CITY OF RENTON MEMO UTILITY PLAN REVIEW SUBJECT: PREAPPLICATON REVIEW COMMENTS COLUMBIA BANK PREAPP NO. 07-039 Parcel 1932059072 NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN TIDS REPORT: The following comments on development and permitting issnes are based on the pre-application snbmittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that Information contained in this summary may be subject to modification andlor concurrence by official decision makers (e.g. Hearing Examiner, Boards of Adjustment, Board of Public Works and City·Council). Review comments maya:Jso 'li.:C, need to be revised hased on:site planning and other design changes required by the City or made bY··1be .'u ';';'. applicant. .. , : ". , .' , .. WATER ~.;- 1. There is an existing 12-inch water main fronting the site in SW 7th Street and a 12-inch looped water main on the site. See City drawing W -2236. Available derated fire flow in the area is approximately 5,500 gpm. Pressure available is approximately 75 psi. 2. Preliminary fire flow requirement is 2,750 gpm. All new construction must have fire hydrants capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 gpm. Three hydrants will be required to serve this site. One hydrant is required within ISO feet of the buildings and two additional hydrants are required to be within 300 feet of the nearest corners of the building. 3. There are fire hydrants in the vicinity that may be counted towards the fire protection oftrus project, but are subject to verification for being within the required distance. Existing hydrants counted as fire protection will be required to be retrofitted with a qUick disconnect Storz fitting if not already in place. 4. The proposed project is located in the 196 water pressure zone and is outside an Aquifer Protection Zone. 5. Water System Development Charge (SOC) of $0.273 per square foot of gross site area will apply. This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. 6. A fire spookIer system may be required by the fire department A separate no-fee utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly for fire sprinkler line. All devices installed shall be per the latest Department of Health "Approved List" of Backflow Prevention Devices. Location of device shall be shown on the civil plans and shall show note: "Separate plans and utility permit for DDCV A installation for Fire Sprinkler System will be required". DDCV A installations outside the building shall be in accordance with the City of Renton Standards. . , Columbia Bank Page 2 of3 May 23,2007 For DDCV A installations proposed to be installed inside the building, applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing the location and installation of the backflow assembly inside the mechanical room. Installation shall be in accordance with the City of Renton's requirements. DDCVA shall be installed immediately after the pipe has passed through the building floor slab. Installation of devices shall be in the horizontal position only. SANITARY SEWER 1. There is private sewer main on site at the north end of the site. 2. If finished floor elevation is below 25 feet, a "tideflex" or similar backflow device will be required to be installed. 3. A Sanitary Sewer System Development Charge (SDC) of $0.142 per square foot of gross site area will be apply. This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. SURF ACE WATER 1. There are existing storm drainage facilities in SW 7 th Street. 2. A preliminary drainage plan and drainage report will be required with the site plan application. The report shall address detention and water'quality requirements as outlined in the 1990 King County Surface Water , Manual. All' core and-any special requirements shall be contained in the report. If preliminaryoalculations ' ", show detention will be reqUired under the 1990 ;King 'County Surface Water Manual, staffwiH recommend· . a condition that the project comply with the 2005 King County Surface Water Design ManuaHomeet both . detention (Conservation Flow control -a.k.a. Level 2) and water quality improvements. 3. The Surface Water SDC is assessed based on the total new impervious surface square footage.'asreflected in the final design. The. chargE! is determined by multiplying the gross square footage by $0.265. This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. 4. Separate structural plans will be required to be submitted for review and approval under a building permit if a wetvault is required. Special inspection from the building department is required. 5. Erosion control needs to comply with the Dept of Ecology's most current Stormwater Manual. TRANSPORTATION/STREET 1. There are street improvements in SW 7th No additional improvements are required. 2. A traffic mitigation fee of $75 per additional generated daily trip shall be assessed as determined by the ITE trip generation manual. 3. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Under Grounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. All construction utility permits for utilities, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. C;olurnbia Bank Page 3 of 3 May 23, 2007 2. When the utility plans are complete, please submit three (3) copies of the drawings, two (2) copies of the drainage report, permit application and an itemized cost of construction estimate and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check, it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. 3. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half the fee must be paid upon application. 4. Any proposed rockeries or retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height will be require a separate building permit and will require special inspection. 5. Separate permits and fees for water meter (s), side sewer (s), landscape irrigation meters and backflow devices are required. CC: Kayr,n Kittrick i',I: • . ,,--, ': , DATE: May 24, 2007 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM TO: Pre-Application File No. PRE07-039 FROM: Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner, (425) 430-7382 SUBJECT: Columbia Bank, PRE07-039 General: We have completed a preliminary review of the above-referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Development Services Director, PlanninglBuildinglPublic Works Administrator, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall and are available on the City of Renton website (www.rentonwa.gov). Project Proposal: The project site, consisting of 42,000 sf of a 245,128 sf tax parcel (#1923059072), fronts the south side ofSW 7'h Street, approximately 565 feet west of Hardie Ave SW. The proposal is to develop the parcel with a 2-story banking services building, including a drive-up window and surface parking for 39 vehicles. Current Use: The parcel is currently vacant, but used for vehicle parking by an auto dealer and possibly impounded vehicles. Billy McHale's and Jimmy Mac's Restaurants are on the same parcel. The portion of the property intended for development abuts the Wal-Mart store to the south. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: The property is located within the Employment Area -Valley Comprehensive Plan land use designation. Applicable Comprehensive Plan objectives and policies are: Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Employment Area-Valley designation is to allow the gradual transition of the Valley from traditional industrial and warehousing uses to more intensive retail service and office activities. The intent is to allow these new activities without making industrial uses non-conforming and without restricting the ability of existing businesses to expand. Columbia Bank Preapplicatio • 'oeting May 24, 2007 Page 2 of9 Objective LU-AAAA: Provide for a mix of employment-based uses, including commercial, office, and industrial development to support the economic development of the City of Renton. Policy LU-444. Develop the Green River Valley ("The Valley") and the Black River Valley (located between Sunset Blvd and SW Grady Way) areas as places for a range and variety of commercial, office, and industrial. Policy LU-446. Multi-story office uses should be located in areas most likely to be served by future multi-modal transportation opportunities. A greater emphasis on public amenities is appropriate for this type of use. Policy LU-447. Developments should be encouraged to achieve greater efficiency in site utilization and result in benefits to users with techniques including: I) Shared facilities such as parking and site access, recreation facilities and amenities; 2) An improved ability to serve development with transit by centralizing transit stops; and 3) An opportunity to provide support services (e.g. copy center, coffee shop or lunch facilities, express mail services) for nearby development that otherwise might not exist. Objective LU-CCCC: Ensure quality development in Employment Area-Valley. Policy L U-4SS. Street trees and landscaping should be required for new development within the Valley to provide an attractive streetscape in areas subjected to a transition of land uses (Refer to the Community Design Element). Policy LU-456. Vehicular connections between adjacent parking areas are encouraged. Incentives should be offered to encourage shared parking. Policy LU-457. Site design for office uses and commercial, and mixed-use developments should consider ways of improving transit ridership through siting, locating of pedestrian amenities, walkways, parking, etc. Policy LU-458. Site plan review should be required for all new projects in the Employment Area-Valley pursuant to thresholds established in the City's development regulations. Policy LU-459. New development, or site redevelopment, should conform to development standards that include scale of building, building fayade treatment to reduce perception of bulk, relationship between buildings, and landscaping. The following objectives and policies of the community Design Element of the Comprehensive Plan are applicable to the project: 07·039 Columbia Bank (CA. SW 7th St).docl Columbia Bank Preapplicatior'· . eting May 24, 2007 Pagd of9 Development in Commercial Districts and New Residential Subdivisions Summary: Objectives and polices that address commercial infill and residential subdivlsion development are intended to serve multiple purposes. First, concerns about new development "fitting in" to established areas of Renton have resulted in an increased awareness that site design and architecture, when planned to be compatible with the context of the neighborhood or commercial area, can make the "fit" of the new project more comfortable. Second, these objectives and policies provide assistance to project proponents so when planning new development for Renton, they can be guided in their choices. Third, city officials, who must make decisions regarding new projects, can use these objectives and poliCies to guide their review of project proposals. Elements of new development represented by objectives and policies in this section include: A. Site planning B. Architecture E. Landscaping F. Streets, sidewalks, and streetscape . G. Signs H. Lighting A. Site Planning Summary: Site planning is the art and science of arranging structures, open space, and non-structural elements on land in a Junctional way so that the purpose of the development can be met, while keeping those elements in harmony with each other and with the context of the project. Policy CD-17: Development should be designed (e.g. site layout, building orientation, setbacks, landscape areas and open space, parking, and outdoor activity areas) to result . in a high quality development as a primary goal, rather than to maximize density as a first consideration. Policy CD-19: During development, significant trees, either individually or in stands, should be preserved, replaced, or as a last option, relocated. Policy CD-21: Development should have buildings oriented toward the street or a common area rather than toward parking lots. Policy CD-24: Site design of development should relate, connect, and continue design quality and site function from parcel to parcel. 07-0)9 Columb;a Bank (CA, SW 7th St).docl Columbia Bank Preappiicatio eting May 24, 2007 Page 4 of9 Policy CD-26: Streets, sidewalks, and pedestrian or bike paths should be arranged as an interconnecting network. Dead-end streets and cul-de-sacs should be discouraged. A grid or "flexible grid" pattern of streets and pathways, with a hierarchy of widths and corresponding traffic volumes, should be used. Policy CD-28: Non-residential development should have site plans that provide street access from a principal arterial, consolidate access points to existing streets, and have internal vehicular circulation that supports shared access. Policy CD-30: If transit service is available, parking requirements may be reduced or shared parking serving multiple developments may be allowed. Policy CD-32: Neighborhoods should have human-scale features, such as pedestrian pathways and public spaces (e.g. parks or plazas) that have discernible edges, entries and borders. B. Architecture Summary: It is not the intent of these poiicies to dictate the architectural style of structures in the City of Renton. The Community Design architectural policies are intended to encourage design of structures that fit well into the neighborhood, reflect the physical character of Renton, mitigate potential negative impacts of development, and function well in meeting the needs of both the building occupant and the community. Objective CD-G: Architecture should be distinctive and contribute to the community aesthetic. Policy CD-40: Structures should be designed (e.g. building height, orientation, materials, color and bulk) to mitigate potential adverse impacts, such as glare or shadows on adjacent less intense land uses and transportation corridors. Policy CD-41: Rooftops that can be seen from higher elevations, taller buildings, and public streets, parks, or open space should be designed to hide mechanical equipment and to incorporate high-quality roofing materials. Policy CD-42: Design characteristics in larger, new developments or individual building complexes should contribute to neighborhood and/or district identity. Objective CD-I: New commercial buildings should be architecturally compatible with their surroundings in terms of their bulk and scale, exterior materials, and color when existing development is consistent with the adopted land use vision and Purpose Statements for each Commercial and Center Designation in the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element, Center and Commercial Policies. Policy CD-43: A variety of architectural design and detailing should be encouraged and innovative use of building materials and finishes should be promoted. 07·039 Columbia Bank (CA, SW 7th St).doc\ Columbia Bank Preapplicatio •. eting May 24, 2007 Page50f9 Policy CD-44: Development should provide appropriate landscaping and .fayade treatment when located along designated City arterials or adjacent to less mtense developments in order to mitigate potentially adverse visual or other impacts. C. Landscaping Summary: Landscaping IS a key element of the City. It can be used to create distinctive character for developments. neighborhoods and along city streets; to frame views; to block unsightly views; or mitigate the scale of large buildings. It can also be used to reduce traffic noise levels and the effects of pollution. Policy CD-45: Existing mature vegetation and distinctive trees should be retained and protected in developments. Policy CD-50: Trees should be planted along residential streets, in parking lots requiring landscaping, and in other pervious areas as the opportunity arises. Trees should be retained whenever possible and maintained using Best Management Practices as appropriate for each type. Policy CD-51: Landscaping is encouraged, and may be required, in parking areas to improve their appearance and to increase drainage control. Policy CD-52: Landscape and surface water drainage plans should be coordinated to maximize percolation of surface water and minimize runoff from the site. Objective CD-K: Site plans for new development projects for all uses, including residential subdivisions, should include landscape plans. Policy CD-53: Landscape plans for proposed development projects should include public entryways, street rights-of-way, stormwater detention ponds, and all common areas. Policy CD-55: Maintenance programs should be required for landscaped areas in development projects, including entryways, street rights-of-way, stormwater retention/detention ponds, and common areas. D. Streets, Sidewalks, and Streets cape Objective CD-L: Promote development of attractive, walkable neighborhoods and shopping areas by ensuring that streets are safe, convenient, and pleasant for pedestrians. Policy CD-57: The design of pedestrian -oriented environments should address safety as a first priority. Safety measures should include generous separation of cars and pedestrians, reducing the number of curb cuts and driveways, having numerous, well-marked street crossings, and providing street and sidewalk lighting. 07-<l39 Columbia Bank (CA. SW 7th St}.doc\ Columbia Bank Preapplication ,. eting May 24, 2007 Page 60f9 Policy CD-58: Aesthetic improvements along street frontages should be provided, especially for properties abutting major streets and boulevards. Incentives should be provided for the inclusion of streets cape amenities including: landscapmg, pubhc art, street furniture, paving, signs, and planting strips in developing and redevelopmg areas. Objective CD-M: Develop a system of residential streets, sidewalks, and alleys that serve both vehicles and pedestrians. Policy CD-59: A citywide street and sidewalk system should provide linkages within and between neighborhoods. Such system should not unduly increase pass-through traffic, but should create a continuous, efficient, interconnected network of roads and pathways throughout the City. Policy CD-60: Criteria should be developed to locate pedestrian and bicycle connections in the City. Criteria should consider: a) Linking residential areas with employment and commercial areas; b) Providing access along arterials; c) Providing access within residential areas; d) Filling gaps in the existing sidewalk system where appropriate; and e) Providing access through open spaces and building entries to shorten walking distances. Policy CD-62: Landscaped parking strips should be considered for use as a safety buffer between pedestrians and moving vehicles along arterials and collector streets. Policy CD-63: Intersections should be designed to minimize pedestrian crossing distance and increase safety for disabled pedestrians. Policy CD-64: Evaluate existing intersections of arterial roadways for opportunities to create focal points, if such focal points do not reduce vehicular or pedestrian safety. Policy CD-65: To visually improve the streetscape, increase the safety of perimeter sidewalks, and facilitate off-street parking, construction of alleys providing rear access to service entries and garages should be encouraged. Alleys are preferred in small-lot subdivisions to provide higher quality site planning that allows garage access from the rear and reduces curb cuts and building mass on narrow lots. Policy CD-66: Sidewalks or walking paths should be provided along residential streets. Sidewalk width should be ample to safely and comfortably accommodate pedestrian traffic. Policy CD-67: Street trees should be used to reinforce visual corridors along major boulevards and streets. 07-039 Columbia Bank (CA, SW 7th St).doc\ Columbia Bank Preapplication ting May 24,2007 Page7of9 Policy CD-68: Street trees should be protected. Ifremoval is necessary for municipal purposes such as infrastructure improvements or maintenance, trees should be replaced with the same size and type. Upon adoption of citywide standards, street trees should be upgraded consistent with those standards. Policy CD-69: Appearance of parking lots should be improved by screening through appropriate combinations oflandscaping, fencing, and berms. Policy CD-71: All utility lines should be placed underground. E. Lighting Objective CD-O: Lighting systems in public rights-of-way should be provided to improve safety, aid in direction finding, and provide information for commercial and other business purposes. Excess lighting beyond what is necessary should be avoided. Policy CD-SO: All exterior lighting should be focused and directed away from adjacent properties and wildlife habitat to prevent spillover or glare. Policy CD-Sl: Lighting should be used as one means to improve the visual identification ofresidences and businesses. Policy CD-S2: Lighting fixtures should be attractively designed to complement the architecture of a development, the site, and adjacent buildings. Policy CD-S3. Lighting within commercial and public areas should be located and designed to enhance security and encourage nighttime use by pedestrians. Zoning: The property is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone. The proposed commercial use would be permitted and the drive-up window allowed as an Accessory Use to the on-site financial service (bank) Commercial Arterial development standards (RMC 4-2-120 "Development Standards for Commercial Zoning Designations") must be met. Environmental Review: The proposed project is not exempt from Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review due to the size of the project and number of parking stalls. The threshold to require environmental review is 4,000 sf or 20 parking stalls. Therefore, an environmental checklist is a submittal requirement. An environmental determination will be made by the Renton Environmental Review Committee. This determination is subject to appeal by either the project proponent, by a citizen of the community, or another entity having standing for an appeal. Site Plan Review: Projects that are subject to SEPA review located within the Employment Area -Valley and Commercial Arterial zone are subject to Site Plan Review. Based on the project size, the review would be done administratively (no public hearing). The submittal requirements for Site Plan Review are included with the preapplication memo. 07.039 Columbia Bank (CA. sw 7th St).doc\ Columbia Bank Preapplication eting May 24,2007 Page 80f9 Development Standards: RMC 4·2· 120A, "Development Standards for Commercial Zoning Designations" apply to new development on the site, A copy of the development standards, RMC 4·2·110F, can be found in the packet given to the applicant at the pre·application meeting. Lot size-The proposed development narrative indicates that the property will be developed on a leased portion of the tax parcel and not subdivided into individual lots. Lot coverage -The CA zone allows a maximum building coverage of 65 percent, or 75 percent if parking is provided within a building or within an on·site parking garage: Site data submitted at the time of application must indicate site coverage by buildings and by . . ImpervIOUS area. Setbacks -Setbacks are the distance between the building and the property line or any private access easement. The front yard setback is required to be a minimum of \0 feet. Parking is not allowed within the setback area. The side yard along a street setback is required to be a minimum of 10 feet. This setback may be reduced to zero through the Site Plan Review process. There is no minimum rear yard setback. Building height -The maximum building height is 50 feet. The building is proposed to be 2 stories. Refuse and Recycling Areas: Refuse and recycling areas must be screened (RMC 4·4·090) and accessible to waste management vehicles. Landscaping: The development standards require that all pervious areas be landscaped, All landscape areas are to include an underground irrigation system. Refer to landscape regulations (RMC 4·4·070) for further general and specific landscape requirements. The existing trees fronting SW 7th Street should be utilized in the new landscape plan. The lower limbs may be pruned to raise the canopy farther above the sidewalk. Parking lots and parking areas are to be landscaped. See RMC 4·4·080F7 for parking area landscaping requirements, A conceptual landscape plan and landscape analysis meeting the requirements in RMC 4·8· 120D, shall be submitted at the time of application for Site Plan Review. Access: Indirect access would be from SW 7th Street along the west and east side of the leased, developed portion of the site. Access easements may be required. Parking: Parking for nomesidential uses is based on the use. See RMC 4·4·080 for general parking regulations, including dimensions of parking areas, and RMC 4·4·080Fl 0 for number of spaces required for each use type. The total parking requirement would be based on the net area of the building. It is not clear if the proposed plan, with 39 spaces, would meet the parking requirement because the net square footage of the building is not provided. 07-039 Columbia Bank (CA, SW 7th St).doc\ Columbia Bank Preapplicatiol :hng May 24, 2007 Page 9 of9 The parking requirement for banks is 0.4 spaces per 100 nsf. A stacking space requirement for the drive-up window is applicable. The stacking requirement is for 5 spaces per window. The spaces cannot obstruct parking spaces, ingress/egress to the site, or the public right-of- way. Demonstration of adequate stacking area must be submitted with the site plan. Permit Requirements: Site Plan Approval, Environmental Review, and building permits will be required for the project. Please contact the main counter of the Development Services Division at (425) 430-7200 for building permit information including fees. Fees: Impact fees and fees for building and utility construction permits would be charged. The following mitigation fees would be required prior to utility construction permit issuance or building permit issuance: • A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. • A fire mitigation fee of $0.52 per sf commercial Please see the comments from the Fire Prevention plans reviewer and Public Works plans reviewer for a breakdown of the fees. A handout listing all of the City'S Development related fees is also attached for reference. In advance of submitting the full application package, applicants are strongly encouraged to bring in one copy of each application item for a pre-screening to the customer service counter to help ensure that the application is complete prior to making all copies. Cc: Jennifer Henning 07·039 Columbia Bank (CA, SW 7th Stl.doc\ < . , st. I L.-,-.-~. '; \ (I) .. -): OJ : L,, _____ >_ :, «: i, CI.l " <t:l § ..c: E- IM <'I ~ 1&:1 ~ ilL IM ~ t. <'I. f-< ;t a IM " i ii li JIM 1M. <t:l <:) Q) .::: Q) C/.l .......... ", .. : : I~ IM ,SW 16th CD CD i CD .. IH CA ...---1 CA I '1"'t-----I L.. .. St. CA cU:. CD -d p:: I>, Q) --...... ~ .. 'sw 19th :SL ~ CD CD SW ! 21st st. TL SW 23rd St. I "-." ' "~------- CA CA R-l CD 00\ I '" .R=l H3 • 30 T23N RSE W V2 o 100 :fOO G3 19 T23N RSE W 1/2 5319 e ZONING + ~ + PIBIPW. TBCllNlCAL IIJ.VlCI8 -. 114800 .. • Peter P. Bonnell (425)453-1414 CITY OF RENTON RENTON, WASHINGTON To Whom it May Concern: PETER P. BONNELL 225 106th A venue Northeast Bellevlle, Washington 98004 January 17,2008 JAN 3 1 2008 RECEIV::;;D Facsimile (425) 453-0117 I hereby authorize Zenczak & Partners Architects to submit plans to the City of Renton on behalf of the Bonnell Family LLC. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me directly by telephone at (425) 453-1414. Sincerely, RESOLUTION OF THE BONNELL F AMIL Y LLC RESOL YED, that it is desirable and in the best interest of the Bonnell Family LLC, a limited liability company ("LLC") organized under the laws of the State of Washington, that Peter P. Bonnell is currently acting as the assistant general manager of said entity, as the general manager, Frank B. Bonnell, Jr., has a medical condition that prevents him from carrying out said duties on behalf of the LLC, and that Peter P. Bonnell is expressly authorized to aet for the LLC in matters relating to all current development efforts, being contemplated or implemented at the Renton Wal-Mart shopping center, given the current situation and to do all things necessary for the benefit of the LLC and its members. CERTIFICATE I certify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of Washington, that the foregoing is true and correct. """. /J ~ /y ~ STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ) ) ) PETER P. BONNELL ss. On this l7th day of January, 2008, before me a notary public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared Peter P. Bonnell, as authorized agent for the Bonnell Family L.L.c., personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person who executed this instrument; on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument for the Bonnell Family L.L.c.; acknowledged that he signed and sealed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed as the assistant general manager and duly authorized agent for said principal for the uses and pU'lJoses therein mt::ntioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written furor;, -- Washington, Residing at !:Olf . NOTARY PUBLIC in and~r the State of My appomtment expIres _~'!'u'-'.I..!.~=.L2.tl.l1 ___ _ "- January 31, 2008 City of Renton Renton, WA To Whom It May Concern: LfiJ ColumbiaBank JAN 3 1 2008 Ri;SCEiVEO I hereby authorize Zenczak & Partners Architects to submit plans to the City of Renton on behalf of Columbia Banle If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me directly by telephone at 253- 471-4092. Sincerely, ~~~,L---I-L-l----,,-,+I/ e {!(LIL~ -~ --~, ~~~~~~--~r------- Jerry lsaksenl Associ te Zencz~ers P.D. Box 2156 • Tacoma, Washington 98401-2156 Lfil ColumbiaBank STATE OF WASHINGTON County of Pierce ) )ss. ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that,-;:-___ -,---.,...,-__ itM/!,.y !C Ilk ?W~ is the person who appeared before me, and said person ackno~jedged that he / she signed this instnunent and acknowledged it to be his / her free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this inst t. Dated:_~/,--,,-rl,-,-I_--bdL.L.<::5:.-' __ Connty of Pierce )ss. ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that,-::-___ -:---.,...,-__ ; /Ff(tLt 11;1/ ):'iu,-is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknoWi'edged 'that he / she signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his / her free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrum~ Dated: / ~ j; -,Jff ----xi~~.' ~~s::=::::::-::: P.D. Box 2156 • Tacoma, Washington 98401-2156 , 0.., \ LlEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION DEVELOPMt=NT PL};N~'ilNG WAIVE:" OF SUBMITTAL REQUIL_MENTS C!TIOn;f:NiOCl This requirement may be waived by: 1, Property Services Section . 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Development Planning Section FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS JAN 3 1 2008 RECEiVED PROJECT NAME: [gtwm, ke('Q.= ~ DATE: ~ 14 \ VOl' 09106 ;,:- • ~'DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ,~, WAIVI OF SUBMITTAL REQUI MENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND , InvAnl'orv of Sites Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND' of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 Map of View Area , Photosimulations 2 AND, ! This requirement may be waive:d by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: ~~ 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Bulldlng Section t Development Planning Section DATE: -----'-~---,f-'L=-t+-t-I -=:;2-b--><-rTf+--- Q;IWEBIPWlDEVSERVlFormslPlannlnglwalverofsubmlltalreqs_9-06,xls 09/06 ... City of Renton • DE\]f(~9~'::}~-;Ji2)~1 TREE RETENTiON IAN j \ 20')~ WORKSHEET 1. Total number of trees over 6" in diameter 1 on project site: 1. --CJ"<-P---trees 2. Deductions: Certain trees are excluded from the retention calculation: Trees that are dead, diseased, or dangerous 2 trees Trees in proposed public streets trees Trees in proposed private access easements/tracts trees Trees in critical areas 3 and buffers trees Total number of excluded trees: 2. _____ trees 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1: 3. _____ trees 4. Next, to determine the number of trees that must be retained 4, multiply line 3 by: 0,3 in zones Re, R-1, R-4, or R-8 0.1 in all other residential zones 0.05 in all commercial and industrial zones 4. ~9f<----trees 5. List the number of 6' or larger trees that you are proposing5 to retain 4: 5. _____ trees 6. Subtract line 5 from line 4 for trees to be replaced: 6. ____ trees 7. Multiply line 6 by 12" for number of required replacement inches: 7. 8. Proposed size of trees to meet additional planting requirement: (Minimum T caliper trees required) 8. 9. Divide line 7 by line 8 for number of replacement trees 6: (if remainder is .5 or greater, round up to the next whole number) _--}¢5~ __ inches 7 _____ inches per tree 9. _____ trees L Measured at chest height 2. Dead, diseased or dangerous trees must be certified as such by a forester, registered landscape architect, or certified arborist, and approved by the City. 3. Critical Areas. such as wetlands, streams, floodplainS and protected slopes, are defined in Section 4-3-050 of the Renton Municipal Code (RMC). 4. Count only those trees to be retained outside of critical areas and buffers. 5 The City may require modification of the tree retention plan 10 ensure retention of the maximum number of trees per RMC 4-4-130H7a 6 Inches of street trees, inches of trees added to critical areas/buffers, and inches of trees retained on site that are less than 6' but are greater than 2' can be used to meet the tree replacement requirement. H:DivisionlForms/TreeRetentionWorksheet 11/07 F3 • 18 T23N RSE W 1/2 (I' i 1 M G H i Jr1 C f: ~ -nVlst If i '5. v-: I f"" 'S:1T ,..--t" I :111 M ~ I Mi' 1M i ::r._~r~ fU)7/ ! I' ,ttJ :--'--, L .... 1/ t' : -'''1---1 CA ----, C A L--- , ', ..... -.-----'- I I ~M s~ \0\'\1." -I s~ v-L_._" ~~CIA_ ~cr!~ _ CA ._ ~~~'o"tJ~'" ,1<" ' '" CO V~ • ~;; ~b'IV ."~."'. LL~~=lB-I--~ : 1M . I H3 • 30 T23N RSE W 1/2 ~ ZONING -" --_too "'17 1Jm!" ~ = m>lIN1c.\L naVICD G3 19 T23NR5E W 1/~19 Project Narrative for: Columbia Bank @ Renton, WA Project name Columbia Bank -Renton Branch Building I lot size 2-story, 8,600 s.f. 142,019 s.f. (0.96 acres) Site Address 225 SW 7'h Street, Renton, WA 98057 Land Use Employment Area -Valley ComprehenSive Plan Land Use designation Zoning CA Current Use Currently vacant, gravel covered lot Special site features None Soil type & drainage Compact fill (gravel asphalt) within top 24" of grade with mottled and mixed, sandy, silt fill below to approximately 40". Proposed use & scope Retail bank I office Access The site will be accessed from the two (2) existing ~rivate driveways, serving the existing shopping center, extending from SW 7 h St. Off site improvements Due to the existing "pad" location and surrounding development, existing sidewalks, fire hydrants and misc. utilities are existing and are not intended to be modified. Construction cost $1,200,000 (est.) Est. material quantities I type Approximately 330 CY exported from site I existing gravel fill THAT PORTION OF LOT 1, CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT LUA-04-027-SHPL (BILLY MCHALE'S SHORT PLAT) RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 20040503900002, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1, THENCE SOUTH 89'10'29" EAST 99.14 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89'10'29" EAST 305.43 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH LINE; THENCE SOUTH 00'56'07" WEST 138.53 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88'45'24' WEST 306.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01'13'39' EAST 136.30 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 42,019 SQUARE FEET (0.96 ACRES), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WM, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Landscape Analysis: Columbia Bank @ Renton, WA 1. TOTAL SITE / TOTAL BUILDING AREA 253,360 S.F. /20,000 S.F. (INCLUDES NEW BLDG.) 2. LEASE SITE / BUILDING AREA 42,019 S.F. / 8,600 S.F. 3. EXIST.! PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS 38,000 S.F. / 30,680 S.F. (PROPOSED) (LEASE AREA) 4. BUILDING AREA 8,600 S.F. (5,600 1ST FLR, 3,000 2ND FLR.) 5. % OF LEASE LOT COVERED BY BUILDING 13% 6. # OF PARKING STALLS REQUIRED 34 -43 STALLS (4/1,000 S.F. MIN. - 5 /1,000 S.F. MAX.) 7. OF PARKING STALLS PROVIDED 37 STALLS (24) STD.&(2)HDCP.9'X20',(11) 9'X18' COMPACT) 8. LANDSCAPING AREA 11,340 S.F. JAN 31 2008 Construction Mitigation description for: Columbia Bank @ Renton. WA Proposed construction dates Hours & days of construction Hauling I transportation routes Measures to reduce constr. impact Special construction hours Traffic control plan April 2008 -December 2008 7 AM -4PM Monday thru Friday Cut & fill to remain onsite -hauling routes not applicable 1. Construction to begin prior to morning rush hour and conclude prior to afternoon rush hour. 2. A construction entrance shall be constructed at the southwest corner of the site. 3. The site shall include filter fabric, clear plastic, temporary seeding, as well as storm drain inlet protection as identified on civil sheet C2.1. 4. The site shall be watered during dry periods on site. None expected Because all existing utilities are stubbed to the site, all construction activity will be isolated onsite, no traffic control will be required. , DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: DEVE!.QC'MEf'IT PLi".J.N;\lrr'G en Y OF ;:'~~~t~To~,j' 'f JAN 3 1 2003 RECEIV20 The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For non project actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. H:IClient FileslColumbia SanklBranch FilelRentonlDocslRenton SEPA 08-01-09.docOl/1 0/08 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Columbia Bank 2. Name of applicant: Columbia Bank -cia Zenczak & Partners -Architects 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: cia Zenczak & Partners -Architects 4545 South Union Avenue, Suite 200; Tacoma, WA 98409 (253) 475-0380 4. Date checklist prepared: January 2008 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction 2008 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Building and Development Permits. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The proposal is for a two-story bank building with approximately 8,600 square feet and associated 37 parking stalls. H:IClient File.IColumbia 8ankl8ranch FilelRentonlDocslRenton SEPA 08-01-09.doc 2 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project is located on the south side of SW 7th, east of Rainier Avenue South. The site is north of the Renton Walmart. Parcel No. 11817430400 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); [fiatl, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other _____ _ b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 1% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Topsoil over gravely sand. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The site is cut and fill neutral. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Risk of significant erosion would be slight given the site's topography, location, and size. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 75%. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: An erosion control plan will be prepared by a civil engineer. H:IClient FileslColumbia BanklBranch FilelRenlonlOocslRenton SEPA 08-01-09.doc 3 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (Le., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Some exhaust from equipment during construction. Automobile exhaust once the building is open. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. The site is surrounded by downtown streets which are a source of vehicle emissions. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: NIA 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NIA 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 1 DO-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No H:\Client Files\Columbia Bank\Branch FilelRenton\Docs\Renton SEPA 08-01-09.doc 4 b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. The project will be served by sanitary sewer. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water fiow into other waters? If so, describe. The on-site storm system will collect storm water from the building and associated impervious surfaces (sidewalks and parking lot), treat as necessary, and discharge into the city storm system. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The storm system will be deSigned by a civil engineer to meet all current storm water regulations. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: __ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other __ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ~ shrubs ~ grass __ pasture __ crop or grain __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The majority of the site vegetation will be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The site landscaping will be professionally designed and instal/ed. H:IClient FileslColumbia BanklBranch FilelRentonlOocslRenton SEPA 08-01-09.doc 5 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, [songbirds], other _______ _ Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other _________ _ Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other ______ _ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Natural gas and electricity will be the primary energy sources. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The building will meet or exceed the requirements of the Washington State Energy Code. 7, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None H:IClient FileslColumbia BanklBranch FilelRentonlDocslRenton SEPA 08·01·09.doc 6 b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic noise. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basIs (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Shari term -Construction 6.'00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Long term -Traffic 6:00 a.m. to 9.00 p.m. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently vacant. Adjoining properiies are all commercial. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? CA f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? EA V Comprehensive Plan Designation. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? NIA h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 25 people will work in the completed building. H:IClienl FileslColumbia BanklBranch FilelRenlonlDocslRenlon SEPA 08-01-0S.doc 7 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The project conforms to the current zoning, comprehensive plan, and design standards for the City of Renton. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. NIA b. Approximately how many units. if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. NIA c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: NIA 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. The highest point of the building will be approximately 34 feet. Exterior materials will include stucco, brick, glass, and metal. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None 11, LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Parking lot lighting, interior building lights. and lights from vehicle traffic would mainly occur during business hours. Some continuous operations are possible. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. Lighting will be directed inward or otherwise be shielded from surrounding properties. H:IClient FileslColumbia BanklBranch FilelRentonlDocslRenton SEPA OB-01-09.doc 8 • c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Street lights and vehicle lights. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Lighting will be directed inward or will be shielded. Low shrubs in the landscaping will help prevent headlight glare from affecting adjacent properties. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Shopping areas, restaurants, city parks plus play fields in and around schools. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site will utilize SW 7th Street. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Approximately 37 striped stalls are proposed. H:IClient FileslColumbia BanklBranch FilelRentonlOocslRenlon SEPA 08-01-09.doc 9 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Approximately 1,000 vehicular trips per day with approximately 50 a.m. peak hour trips and 175 p. m. peak hour trips. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The entry access to the private driveway shall be located as far south from SW 7th Street to reduce any backup issues onto the private driveways accessing the city street. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. NIA 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitarv sewer, septic system, other. Storm water system b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electrical -Puget Sound Energy; Refuse -Renton; Water -Renton; Natural Gas - Puget Sound Energy; Telephone -Owest; Sanitary Sewer -Renton. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on m~artl I Pm",,~rit-__ Q-,L...\ , l ~l-- Name Printed Jerry Isa sen Date: January 10, 2008 H:IClienl FileslColumbia BanklBranch File\RenlonlDocslRenlon SEPA 08-01-09.doc 10 Printed: 01-31-2008 Payment Made: CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA08-011 01/31/200804:35 PM Receipt Number: R0800470 Total Payment: 1,500.00 Payee: COLUMBIA STATE BANK Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Payment Check 148400 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 conditional Use Fees 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 Amount 1,500.00 Amount 500.00 1,000.00 Balance Due .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00