Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA02-013
i I i i SCHEMATIC PARKING AREA LAYOUT CL CO o 0_ opE€R° • Z ▪X /// ^ u°°SN Es.Rc Ru,.pwa: !: 3 e Y o k NSiRU N QO Z O a> ° P° e° I MONSTER ROAD SW �� } �o R' u u M Z 0 302.03' S 18.53'48'E \ .a 4•F. e�Xs= 5 CU Q I I-F --I - .rx, 5 F 5 —1 :, sv1m5 P � awlF a-zar,. ty{6 �i�vc '��• �'°'•j� `�"` U BEACON COAL MINE ROAD E ,�.Ei, 1 1�r' '-=!�� _.-`_'' \�,;' 1,':." >: 5 z. �'E8. cr�rro \` AUK.y _,-- --- -- =- o+sz. rror_oor� - oPa ��' K o _,.ioo � © err �--- __ • F" cm ur.Pwc R :%i - 5_., r rso.wrz Vi&, r#A _\�'---= ,♦♦♦�V ----' a 40 c -' k, — - -- / s'w°[GRAVEL Q Z= a s . • � . / IC '.h� ~ ,X L� , f - hXP ®...1.. ...' V. ,41 �r.rio--�4 : ._: _- � 'IY — -.-.-_-- —ECOzT"—_-----_---- —�/ -J%JAB' g T - — .,. Pad. Jam' - -- ' -- / . o . in ,m E am t ?°P° B ' _ .,` : �: ,� � 1� "y -- A ,9- .2f 0 j' . NI 1.1•122 ¢2. -aS-. ' loll' „P 34 m i k . �� d `0:� a� ,: - �oXn ^art a P. e y6 v , IR �,,)p�, w mg< A . yj . IN /..2 '1 -',s.. w 1g Og 55 - :... 3 1 1. I * I°.1 . V e l►n8 • ax 4�1a • llR9 P. 04. '@01141 � _ r a,E,Inrc. is ES — �;C�� a(��{r cxrcwua m s♦7 za- '^ _ -� .a= -N Rm XO5Q00' C 4 •63, >S_IO OXXI C z 55'!2X N 2i 11 3X w E.1,.. EXPIRES 0-10-03 p CFTY OF RENTON OEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORK 03 SCHEMATIC PARKING Ci z • AREA LAYOUT m 0 .aeomo, PPG r lF - mos- -r.E_ . ti z r X. .� a,E ��voti.m, .." or m E COVER SHEET / ' i T r € EROSION CONTROL NOTES 6ESDRE MO CONSIRU.ON OR DEVELOPMENT ILTVTT'OCCURS.A PRE-CONSTRUCTION 'I �4 t AN,VO)1,NN Arks MEETING MUST BE HEAD WITH THE CITY OF RENTON DE M..OF PUBNC WORKS, d ' DESIGN ENGINEER. AP GREq• 9p6 'R WAY Z d 2 ALL UMRS OF CLEARING AND AREAS OF VEGETATION PRESERVATION AS PRESCRIBED ON I qe S SITE CO 0 0- T.PP.SWII BE CLEARLY RAGGED IN THE FIELD AND OBSERVED DURING 2E, ' 0 • 3. ALL REQUIRED SEDINENTAPdN/ER.0N CONTROL FACILITIES MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AND O Z W IN OPERATION PRIOR TO MI CIEWNG ANI/OR BIKER CONSTRUCTION M INSURE THAT CONSTAU�ON SEOUENCET IOkA [[ N �, ST EDIMENT W HE EN WATER DOES NOT ENTER T.NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM. NN.L.EROSION I.ADM PRECONSIRUCIION MEETING Q A SEGMENT FACILITIES SHALL MQ M BE MAINEO A SATISFACTORY CONOMON UNEIL NCR THE TUT MEARNG AND/OR CONSIRUCIION 6 COMP..AND PO..FOR WAIN CITY OF REMOLD. ON-AE ER ERON HAS PASSED. ME IW4EMENTATRNL MAMRNANNCE,REPLACEMENT AND \ ANON M'0A Q W AMMONS TO EROMON/SED.OATON CONTROL SYM S STALL BE THE PTS.L.MITY 2.RAG MEM.LAIR AS SHOWN ON SHEET C2 S11111F 0 Am Z (= OF THE PERYIIIEE 3.CLFM AND ROT.GRADE SITE AND AMEND ES F.LMES AS Q _I 1. ME INTENDED TO BCE UDISIW AREO RMENIS TO M CONTROL EET�TED ON 16'�AS N®ED. .\ •30 F CONSMUCTON PROME55E AND UNEXPECTED 0R Rm....CONDO.DICTATE THE 1.DST.mnlrRs PER APPROVED PLANS5 Qw Ty PERUMEE SITYL W..TUT MORE EROSION AND SEpMBNGTON CONTROL S.PROM.GRIM BASH PROTECT.FOR ALL NEW/Ex FACOTES Y.BE NECESSARY M LAME OM R.SALMON CONTROL ON ME CATCH Bl. AS SWIRL `W PROPOSED SOE WPM ME COURSE OF cm-mum.IT SYNC BE TIE OBLIGATION CAT. _ \` _ O 1 / AND RESPONERBILITY Of T.PERIMEE TO MORESS ANT uou wows DIAT WY BE LRF/JLD A.m./.WI TD PRTIDE AMMO.FACWTOS.OVER AND ABOrE 6.COMPLETE N41 GRADING AND PAW1G AMEND - O S WY BE NEEDED TO PROTECT MACE.PROI.TES A. WATER DDMM OF THE 1.3101/REQUIRE... CEN01G DRAWEE SYSEM. ,CLEAN STORM DMWGF ASIEIL T_1\ �/ U U5. APPROVAL OF THIS PUN 6 FOREROSION/SECOENTA ION CONTROL WAY. T DOE NOT 8 CONTRAC OR SHALL MAINTAIN MSC FACILITIES UNTIL NL RA �,� 'I CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL OF STORM DRMUGE 1.SUE NOR LOW.OF PIPES. OF EROSON SEDMNTATNIN WS PASSD NM Sr0.SS.6 O REIPoCMF6,MA Wl6 OR RETENTION AMMER MBALLED AND FUNCTIONAL DO NOT CONVEY SEWIFTT LADEN 0. WRING ME THE PLOD OF NOVFMBER 1 TMOWH MARCH 31.ALL PROJECT OMURBE0 MA1F11 M10 PUBLIC STORM E• =�' SOIL MEAS GRATER THAN 5,000 SOWRE FEET TUT ME TO BE LEFT UNWORIED OF MORE MAN 13 HOURS,SNAIL BE COVERED BY MLR..SODDING,OR PLASTIC COVERING. 0. IN AIN NffA,WHICH HAS BEEN STRIPPED OF VEGETATION AND WHERE NO FURTHER W➢io , VICINITY MAP S ANTICIPATED FOR A PERIOD OF 30 OATS OR MORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS MUST BE IM EDIAT4Y STABILIZED WRH MULCHING.GRASS PUVIMG OR OTHER APPROVED - EROSION CONTROL TREATMENT APP4GBLE TO ME THE OF YEAR IN OUESDON. GRASS 0 SEEDING ALONG WALL BE ACCEPTABLE ONLY DURING THE MONTHS OF APRIL THROUGH N SEPFFNMR INCLUSIVE SEEDING MAY PROCEED.HOWEVER,WFINEVER IT IS IN THE ZOTHERRTRE TREATMENT APPROVED BY THE PERMITTEE.BUT E CRYEOFURENTON,OUTSIDE D WTI TIESPEC.,1116R a O O PERIOD. _ W H 8. FOR ALL EROSION/SEDMEMATON CONTROL PONDS WHERE THE DW STOWE DEPTH 11I I CC t �E-I w SEJICEEDS B MLHE,A FENCE A MINIMA OF J FEET SHIM 6 REWIRED,W1IH 3:1 SIDE �//r W `Z0 , U�'-I 9. A TEMPORARY GRAVEL WNSIRUCION ENTRANCE 21•x SO'.B•OF 1 TO 6 MW ODN11 MONSTER ROAD .{, : m U c SPA. BE LOCATED AT NL PONS OF VEWWLAR INGRESS AND EGRESS TO THE O T '' ' �' „^, 1 W 5� — n LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4 l ~r.. ¢ V C 9I MIE M EMDESORPTION OF ME PROPOTTY I TRUCK PARKING/STOW4LTM AREA AATE 0 M 80 160 UPASSES 'BEAwN w eTIAL Mfg NE^v� a� Z a Q„ ~ I-I-I—I zAooY i % ,I' J F�. A TRACT OF LAND MOTE IN LDES 48L MB.M,30.31 AND u OF AMMON AMMON TO FF T-W / —��� J,`Y\\— Q b T7 TIE CITY K SFATIIE TONG COUNT.WASWNCTOH SAID TRAM BEING BOIIIIOED ON THE NORTH _ — � --- -=�-j/ _ r EL O g S IT A/ BY THE NORM LANE K SAID LOT u.BOUNDED ON ME WEST AND SdRNWEST BY A LINEc= r:% //�~�-��-^,��:` Y UJ 1A �I R DRAWN PAPAL.AND/OR CONCENTRIC WTM AND SOO FEET DISTANT EASTERLY,MEASURED AT RIGHT AWE AND/OR RADIALLY.FROM ME CENTHIINE OF WIN TUCK OF ME UWDH �I / L� ���,yE 7 1 PACIFIC RAIRCM COI..AS NM CONS RIMIER AND OPERATED,AND ME FAS.LY AND .� � -i ___�- l�-• --- U ORT.SIEIEY RIGHT E OF TEE WRILNGTON NORTHERN RMRONI COMPANY M N/. /.'! / / \(\ —"S'� 4-,. NOW(ANTED,BOUNDED ON THE EST BY ME ASI EERILY THE OF COUNTY UBAO SNO.OUTH). .4-21, •BOUNDED ON KNOWN AN£TER BY THE I ST MOV NE F BEACON OR O. AVENUE SOUTH).AND ,4,c��j y-� ��% \\\�I \,' 'N �S• TOGETHER MM DIE NORTHEAST THOSE PORRTTIO.OF ME VACATED R0 00000 S.LOTS MB,0BA 0'�!_I j^A6�" — '= y}r-—-.--1-_---.,.4,, _ E IXCEPT PORTION OF LED JS uo.WITWN THE UWDN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY;AND 33: -r RR ERUPT PORTION LYING NORM OF ME NORM DOUNDARY OF THE UNNMILD VAG1ED STREET .A' _ �., Y /^ AND ENGEM PORTION CONVEYED M THE CITY OF RENTON,A 4UMCPAL CORPORATION BY DEED ,� 66 RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 940B230032. / _ ryN, A xMw'C.e m-- y-^ -m m� ., ea4 $ 9i ! i DATUM. �N A.W�.�� / P' ) !o�<< } _ • N0CDr55W E am. us. COAg1."'"'WC 01 . '/; S A! im R-1050.00 as5z• 5 § a BRASS DIX J. N•• , Q C "q L-338.55• L: Q n N m - $ EILV.- Jznma 1 •'v"L - '1 �JJ/1 •• gEYINiTi m Ws.3 -': /%I - F �p B•YB 3 H N € CIFlC RR 8 z,•a _- LEGEND. UMON PA 11 3� sBTsr H z��zz'N'W a ECM.CONTOURS ______L-- N' _ ems..... uv�i go EDGING SPOT ELEVATION w __ � m W • < e MSTNG WUVR RA.- / PL.GR4 !_N 1 DMASd .--2"""-1 URIINGTON NORTI RN P V FAISIWG ASPHALT ^-1 B / E•sx Be J� ` A : - EC..STORM ___ ____ „ t Q�l n.`/[cam' it MST.COOLER -—W——- CONTRACTOR WALL BE FULLY REPoNSIBE NR OMNNMG PEMUS FROM THE (R p:P I V `v ESNMG SANITARY SERER — WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF HAroRIL RESOURCES FOR R.N.AND !J REPLACING ALL SURVEY MONUMENATON TUT WY BE AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION �'J/DNA LIEEWG(A �b��0�0��� ACINTT,PURSUANT TO WAC 332-120. APPLICATORS MUST BE COMPLETED Of A 0 REG.11.0 LAND SURVEYOR. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS TO RENCK MONUMENTS I ExPJRES a-f0-0 .^ ny WY BE OBORNEO FROMOURCE ME WASHINGTON STATE DEPART...OF NATURAL j'�Y.j(( RES .OR BY CONTACTING M EN OFFICE TELEPHONE AT(206)9D2-1190. CITY OF RENTON WASWNGI0N STATE 0EPARIMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE UTILITY CONFLICT NOTE. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PD.LAIRD SURVM OFFICE CAUTION WADWCI STREET£E P.O. THE CONMALTOR AWRESPONSE,.FORBE RESPON^ r R VERIFYING TIE LOCATION,DIMENA AND Dx, DEPTH O P.D.BOX 1008LI 0 OF ALL EC..UINIE WHETHER SHOWN ON MESE CONS OR NOT BY POMOUND THE COVER SHEET Z OLWPW WASHMTON 685d-7060 LMUNES AND SUMThHG THE HORIZONTAL RN 4ERTOL IDE..PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION THIS SHALL INCLUDE MUM UTILITY 101101E 0 1-800-1Eh555.5 AND 00 SbIING m MONUMENT UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION,ALL S DISPLACED,REM VEAL OF OR OF THE URINE AT LCCAT10 N MS OF NEW UTILITY CROSSINGS TO PHYSICALLY NPy 0 DEBMO.SHALL UG BE RFPED BY A RFL6TERED LOUD N..R.AT THE COST AND NEDP HET Y WHETHER OR NOT CORIUM'SE.. LOCATORS OF YID URINES AS MOWN ON ON T03 - IMAM 7 T ME DIRECTION OF THE CONTRACTOR PURSUANT M THESE REGULAR°. THE PLANS IRE BASED UPON THE...II WBUC INFORM..AND ARE SUBJECT M MRNIOK _ ux uDY wi! rae xa g IPPNOPRUTE mo FOR REPLACEMMENT OF SAID MONUMENTATION SW1L ALSO BE ME IF CMOUC6 WOULD OCWR THE M000 OILR S1WL CONSULT 0 PROCEEDING _ 3 CIX6B.EMG FNGMERS,INC.10 RESOLVE ILL iNOBtFMS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH BCM W AGE— z RESPoI9BWT'OF THE CONMILTOR CONSTRUCTION MI 01 .iRw M Arm DATE 0060 HPO g mAd�s. 4ffT CT �P3 m • p jxj NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP II�� ���T++77 v +i.: $+ REM. Mt.- L..t.- X I 2 3 4 5 V e ze!..11:111 ,_-,-; 83 G L vATRlcuueeEtooT%250 p1166 drgRT ' ja Al5 IE—Fib. 83Q$�. t_,,,}}":11Qa 0 IRS RSO 500 O N 4, %' ® `�: L67 , I+ AF[O Sze 2 a 11-1'--I_ _I \\O ° v [(jTH h Res 7 E,. a EDI ._.-•> •O c a - As.;� r4i•� Al'o sz AG. 9( o E�g�x „� pp; 3 o _ SPIDER SWIMS AG SALFS TECHNICAL RESEARCH CO. 0 I--•rl �j O 6 ''-�' - 0 5.72Ar. 10SE AO . S 2k 3:-4i Si a 7a1 V7� 645b ti Z S DUWAM/S s o o �yF MSS ,� • EIk �� AS; a 5, If ,� /SI Q p REAL ESTATE EQUITIES CORP. �__ Ay 4TF -I x ¢ '\ 6 I cr_lo w. ,.• `, _�_� S/Gry R ;I 3 } MARTIN F % l R..x ROUTE 900 I � Q 'A FR .° 0 0 .,. EOUL=1Ep Kf4RP. y< ljE/•,am`"` _ L_ �� .. �Govt tat? Z WEFT 567E w �� °1 .. 7 .s / te r/ ��H aI 12 Acres ffP �, uo " �,� «, \ ��f r Jy µK s''`1I a GOLF . '" ° — : - i LOYAL OwwOURX 4 E... • jOo °a" -VA'o ''� 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 I I F w 6 6 34 Q 'Q P: i HR*_; imsr:..R Q \ o SITE 10 . ,.. 1 -�_ 36 3T 36 ✓5 ,x' 0 !� n..- _ — .-- --' A pC (°) Ev ♦ 0 p • s ^�91 1 — •-" 0 r�T Cr/O 5 (7 2 > n • g r-i,,iii,t. '.x. \99 40 41 '� ,\. ,,,.04. I" i ,�" - %i'.'�: 16 -' IC (0 8 a • c i • p41 ;Po ''may ¢. "` __ 'qTT N . �.� 14 ,r IIll , § E 3P8 • ^TF •; ,_ 04 • .9 I (,I '-'"'18 -I IL g ''..,;,2 '`E" it ' . ,„ \ zo s` P 0 ,4: ,.... _ -"'"---"T--- ' ifit 256 co 3 E S ° a #t*I1'131:744f7rii, G ��• G,FI.•7. 't r _ _Ii �° / zFH ro: ,�a:3 'A� i..• y aer \°� ������� ! eIrER _� +�.. a"',,m ii $ r-w- R� .\n /6[Twnox 6sslx PARCEL m -z • S Ilii � � s •CI��ar ��! � �ssi• a C. \ "_--_ � � �, k1 � --• W��Fi"I N G 7 O N TECHNICAL WON May n 3 n r .1'�� >,°},.sn. ?. a ii ❑ ���Zf \` 2 '--��` �I! •����‘�` I ALAC j� .� PARCEL N W N '3 ' .'/A' 7 Q ���� • ?II% i ,000'� �•F .'1�7,SUPP6 •j•% stl• % \ �Y..... a I Gy • � �u ��� � gill 12 :..✓ +"iP'� MONSTER D •3 n• \ CENTER 04"R . ,f'J�N e TRAff II: t IA L ` ` j , ' 2.\j y; _._._._.i_r.- - ._. `/a:- ..... A. _ A. sr cisRa �`` d' /' °v z m • Qo`` ,1�� r/ -.* •\ m3Ac ,1 ' Covi Lott V'.. . C' W A s N I N G EXPIRES E LP`x d'� GOa 1 dP' \ -�r� �'It,' Gov't Lot 2 a • _ 1370 Acres - s' ' / T _ ,_ CITY OF RENTON § K td • V9 \ // Q'�AvV �\:`'.•.0\ - I'\' ``j r.<• < DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS r +�S , ' '` ii1\..�` NEIgi80RNOOD DETAIL MAP m Ix 12 / Ire .... xxw -t -%\ py. AIM a ZI="r. a $'4,141 I i' \\. • " .d i aeaik. cxc=Eu Nx �.....,.. --6<.. LLl [ - m 2 GRADING, DRAINAGE AND TEMPORARY EROSION SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN ill 1 co 0 �a IF Oci8ME z MATCH EC CC CO . ^, OOM.EC NC RAMP/ E-,Lr WISTRUCT NEW RAMP a I O.a 20 CO 80 1 MONSTER ROAD SW a 4 ``_ N 3 3020]' R 1B5]'.R E :i P.P. arm I I—I I EOMa P< , Uj @`@Y 'teEDGE a {_''._ - I 's� ]17 P.m POLL a'm 5-s,ea Q© ar or .Es,'� • = . =iy` E �rt N V W Cr i/rPPOLE , wEN m �\`�—_—'—��"�Z •1•/F / O 1� `�_ Kr. J 1 ��1ANEaoAD .,� R,ro E. , Tom^ � fr . r. .. --R�. i gC BEACON :°w:_i>�: A ▪ ' Vic, S,g t w ' arc,FeBLE 2b'Oi Sls 2i AB 03 w Bee'0.4r53r j��`\• I' r \\,gT� 4 �i $ am _ -- 3 OO wa- µA ^ .RO o la. - -�'--- i = —Y / cIXBEZ.oF - �.- � _ 7 . / � ' / _ 5 = f i / j _ ` � —s\\�•.0 SITE F. 4• 0'' . . :..;::- 'AS1r.A.010 w vi y/ -- `,, Oxie of Q a zi /9' , :�__- e� / .41PYN�AMaN suRVev so1L ee/ 1/ / —'---.— .,„ y �. U g i-Iwr.•aiwa a`fii.;A'i'�' :'" /� / r/r�YwnuwW amytma�rA�axc u0 / °/ _ 't 9,' ti ---- 1 �'�u ASNu Q� O tyj v �r -2- --_/� TO R _s__� , , RO01) / eel ���. Y 3 Q ^ LC /^��-c'��---=�ij- __ i--�- -- g— \ r-------- 9:5 25L N10ERCM a Z a_ 0 S o g 3 ow�N n �� • PROTEMEN DORM IL b' a o ZPAO.� / xex x o .::::-,n„ --------_-`--' .snr�• • o�,rFi K",f — ! , o�_ — .- _ .. - n.23 TAN `` 1.33 VW / ^ �,a •�4t: 17 .-..1.�1' /� .^ n.lf r/M< mi l'♦. 25 RAD m s.yl a i: ----`z z�r E -- �w�w ,._� w — /�✓ n r Jtw a MOT /./�", :a o-nva �_ ..LR ';.t 1K': 1 _______________= sum ntE op,E IT°O`M IIO,L`e» ,,, S N uP.Nx -. -, y� %'r �. ""'�C +.1 of _ =l�asE4:tiE�w=====_____� S $3g 8 ' '`N A G. ..•. ....�+Es ix: �c w w.AS1R4,T cEprOv.� s 6 j c 9,.li: : • la,sx. OOC� �ry � * , �3Hr ad - M1�Ny - a 1'\`'f/,'�vy]i4 .is.ia 5i N 25 0R ``<. .' ia'` r3"'"'r3 UE'E LR ax zc ws x..„,,, _-'° `+°�.,, , %'�//fF° TO," al" alo„ �40 �JtN a" It n ;wv— ✓� .,I I•' a s.r u SITE DATA = v 24 ADS - '\ R�1050.W AREA AREA TO az�nw"m""�.e ACRESs asn �a lib y�� ES MIDI Lam ' TOTAL}ORAL OWNIRY OF BGVA1pN A 4,013 Cf fC/:871C„ v —10 TOTAL mum.OF MC-7110 CY S!ax.1E CW d ...' . z 587.24 N 24'22 31 W - iE-17e4 I.PARES 6-10-W I CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS GRAD ry�DRAINAGE AND TEMPORARY d EROSION SEDIMENfAT10N CONTROL PLAN m o PAWN WO .ff.C2 0.'3 Om I 6 Y '� PLANTING PLAN i =4s ; _ _ _ P Botanical Nam I � M�Daax Cue 09" E 45 .5 2 o a a o_ S 24' 48' _ _._.-,.._. cedar'Hoc.: — — .. 03' _._.._.._._.. mNla aCeda 240. _.._.._.._.._.._.._. ii Hogan an "° ui o _.._ ' O a Au5e NP al P um 1 3/4• 15-0•°.c. CC e°LlaEoa ¢ N �u= EDGE OF PAVING , ,�� �' PlatavvidM Q "'• _..•�'• IV* �„4. .1,R`Affir s• �'_- sa RI.,.°naumex a sol. a-o•°.°. ._� C( 1'' .:�..,..�`u .qb. _ --.-�I'_ 'p Edward VW J WAir, tl 9 Kin.Edward Red Z 0_ P �,,..e „ E'-`: II F,:1C Flowering Current O z �ON� ^` � 8� s `� -*�� �-5 O oe Co pactS melee ber ueumne 5 e° .-o a.a. Q ELQ —��-1 �4S'= %- °andrm r °II 0—fill"—, "- �� admemt t° n_ 1/ '� i de.n �mn 1 eal. 3'-0•°.� ' - onxnocox Ex.xc PnuP Q ���/J�'� "/ %/ / Vanwwer Jade•KinnickinnicY BMW COW SIRIILL NEW RAMP U TYPICAL SHRUB PLANTING I _ r� °.`� MONSTER ROADNote:NI SW planting areas to watered..0 iN,afian„/ CURB 4 CURER o NEW OA E SCALE,T`20' ! 30203 S.1O53'4B•E �, ro'^u.._._._.._ a a 5„ M R .'' 3.. • "o_— :.a. POSER Pro[ w aRa[R +1,5:: ..i axDa �p O = •e RaM � _� g ::1:,.. ,w _ BEACON COS Aw MINER !{O � �U 0.'. .� rnr �//�`uMlr oFlos�cwq(y/w o • A oa?c peep[ 240.OS'„_5 24.48 09;E..�..1_�j 1 - � rtl[Pxax[ * �>�y iL T T'twT�::.�f= __=__ �f� _ �- - �:\\\ _-- 1:r C7 �L r n 91 ' nlcx-/:mar. _ .`GT _ —IIMR�6F_'y'(,OS �C ��\---- \\\ o'Rno. LEOS CF Z a ; APamx <ei -=- i ----- �C�-- \` dor Ax D,•uaxD i /� it - _—__ / // / ^\ ��` '\\� Y WI- h T01TON Cltt LD.418 ` /%%y: / i ___ 1 / / \�_ _ -�� \� - U qq . �___ l a .[a.x[ar ' _ _ \ _ REMOVE IXISTINC NCE "//(/ / 1 j (ro 3 a.3 / /'/N0�'/ /' -._ ____=____w_ ___`-�___ ___________?r- _ _ ______1-___'-"--- \�. A�cEss RaAn / W ..ij. gip\;/_--=_- -- y aR� — --- oaR�„c fix' /%���/��1 F u•wm[ra.Vc[ "�// ,^L uMR of lauds/ivc 1 -v---- - lob FKERG • ACCESS /1. 3•�!a`-J'/ G-'! �.,-/ /////��SI-FENCE \ ____._.._ [~i s / \ /// /e H IIYDROSEED WET POND /'• J - °-d \ I W / j ' WITH EROSION CONTROL MIX WIE 47. T-, [ R,,II % 4113 VW,. S 41.2Y l W 41]t . In i * 14 :..ro // if' ���'-�='xiz:T — E ;.oc, oa -w.c, -- -- -- o■. ▪- �-- ---- um .�-r r w:o[CODS _ ECM.KO OS �,_ PrnaR Pal s --- _•____ ____________ ___ _ __ _-- k W/OUT TAPE �'I�.,.-� Tr---- . -_-.I. _ -- .._ -_ e- - a al .ansC. y •j p /�.i - [/wnPoxu c.rcry m.sw' [crv, __ --- W SCR �0_• '% '/i �._�-----��r:lx-,-�.-tw.n,mph_ r �_iCCNSTRUCDON I..os e._R�. [,.sP�wl PRANG�[I I'/ ��nJ�QiC� —4- - urz- �3�. IIIJ0i t I (�,YCATCH RAW. IL DC NE•DS 25 I[ .x lsas �J� �-1 e"n �:\ !�•:I�1 /,.r..io1^\ - wS s leas _ o v m' 1 �ii p9• 1' °W,,\ �,;- '.�'..';IC. [caws,m. _- - ME wouirraCT 0.1 :dxTE 3rPro,NP[ '' �,',I, _ _— ; .h i 'IN�: •/ PIP•.43a• _- ,\ / II 1't\� ��-Ihryx ,v a _ jp3.52' - 29'05 56• izOS o h i / "''''''Cl'";"E.R wmE cnn: rcs .D: i 1�-)tq _ _ CITY OF REN�O� 24.o x..=,00, X E M axc W UNITS • �, _ /� / it [caav ecOcxS � _- tp.•-�- DEPARTMENT OF P WORtCB wcx e.sw _-_s a �//.--,/ F - wFluxps x'u=Tai3 \ /h/ r(i ��T .._.=- :<' x I46a _ _______._ _ _._— PLANTING PLAN _.. axl[a[w[ R 405000 "D ._....._.-_.__ IRux L=338.55' .-,.._.-.•_.•_.•_.._. -Y0 ,v'aTs deco® yre at// las L a.a Oz as h t. NW 9GIs V n4a 1411300015__IAT_ _ Kt Mil R[ M.R De,E /MAD ,.a M.Lt a 2 n3555 W,O96S iesei I slagei ssaappy ®AU3Ad 1 1 1 1 1 Phillip Raykovich 'I Prany&Homeone Sounthala ! Joseph&Mary Anderson 6700 S 131St St I I 6621 S 128Th St 11 13049 56Th Ave S Seattle,WA 98178-5012 I Seattle,WA 98178-4700 II Tukwila,WA 98178-4628 <)1 - 11 < 1r 1 OWRR&NavCo I, Tommy Brown 11 OWRR&NavCo PO Box 2500 I I 6719 S 131St I PO Box 2500 Broomfield,CO 80020 i I Seattle,WA 98178 I Broomfield,CO 80020 II I J II )I ( ' Northern Pacific Railway Co 1 Anmarco 1 L P&Mary Ellen Hughes 1 916 Smith Tower I 9125 10Th Ave S I 8865 Overlake Dr W Seattle,WA 98104 Seattle,WA 98108-4612 Medina,WA 98039-5347 HH I Anmarco I - City Of Renton City Of Renton 9125 10Th Ave S I 1055 S Grady Way I 1055 S Grady Way Seattle,WA 98108-4612 I Renton,WA 98055-3232 I Renton,WA 98055-3232 JI �I r I -% 1 11 First City Developments Corp I Anmarco 11 1 Anmarco 1 700 5Th Ave#6000 11 9125 10Th Ave S 1 I 9125 10Th Ave S Seattle,WA 98104-5064 I I Seattle,WA 98108-4612 II Seattle,WA 98108-4612 'II l Union Pacific Railroad Co III L P&Mary Ellen Hughes I L P&Mary Ellen Hughes 1700 Farnam St#S 11 8865 Overlake Dr W ,I 8865 Overlake Dr W Omaha,NE 68102-2002 11 Medina,WA 98039-5347 11 Medina,WA 98039-5347 _21 1 ' 1 111 L P&Mary Ellen Hughes L P&Mary Ellen Hughes 1 L P&Mary Ellen Hughes 8865 Overlake Dr W I 8865 Overlake Dr W I ! 8865 Overlake Dr W Medina,WA 98039-5347 I Medina,WA 98039-5347 II j Medina,WA 98039-5347 ) )11 I �11 1 1 Donald La Mere Brownrigg II William&Mary Bardon 1 I City Of Tukwila 13802 Beacon Coal Mine Rd S I I 16648 6Th Ave SW 6230 Southcenter Blvd 'I _ Seattle,WA 98178 5205 Seattle,WA 98166-3504 I Tukwila,WA 98188 2544 11 r <�1 1l11 City Of Renton 11 State Of Washington I Anmarco 1055 S Grady Way 11 14298 68Th Ave S I 1 9125 10Th Ave S I Renton,WA 98055-3232 II ,WA Seattle,WA 98108-4612 l 1 ` =I 11 , iII OWRR&NavCo I t 111 PO Box 2500 I I Broomfield,CO 80020 I I 1 1 ( , ---------- - I J I I , ls�aays paa yw®09LS Joo aeidwai ash 1 V i i GRADING AND TESCP NOTES AND DETAILS 2 I i �� 10 § o 01 � o .ueE°s; t .0 6 a..,a..rt«w a. ro • • • tech T204040. CC S 3 ,. m.,ao• m I..su.n.l�m I.:� a°...w,.w a wwe Z , L,.rol. w<a.e uro..P — ... :.......... ...:. s���, w • D'w Z • i i `tINOY.OPE O I :: ti' ;u2 Ill F C(57WD'OmUN6 / W .. F O SQg� PVN c .. .. . TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE �, :':':'...:.. . .........:.....................:............ ......................................._._.._................ ...� w : Nm PER MY OF RENTON STD.DETNL BRYO / .....,.... .......:........ USE 5<MB OR wwE I>v.LS TO♦nLTw MO A4'IOgIpNa1'UYER-OF • .... .i.... I. . .................:. af.BRIC 70 WIRE • Sl.6.CNG BmNE ' DAwR / ..... ... 'AMC.fio OR ;. 0;ITIEd01G N�1 ' E4+xEEpNG FRCP B o BNcwru.nexD:e-sB,x:.. . .. . • .�.—.—.. . ..... .. .. o l . Z 6DRD o f El.D /... o • I • F.W W�"iEm.L IN e•ElY+r rm,.. i... .....- ✓.......�........ i ....... .........1. ... ..... .... ......... U C>~ r� 11 —� PeP,.. 'EE.TS.rr: /l'�-'-. .. .......... ............... ..... ..... : . .... ... " LM3 Ire;..au,.m,oo.. a:eo c.we.e .. MwD'. .... .:. ......... . RLTER FABRIC WTERML e.+.m.Ne..m get."Raa.Tr*" .1__W _. MP°eery°DI.R�..N.' C91 +.a.W. w.en�..wI,.T...... rosnv .... .. ..••• .. ._. G O �. ra Elea.disturbed .uq.n m.I:..+.°e a .... .. ..... Z 11 mom' `.o"'°uw.u'w�o e°.we..m a i ... .. .. ......... ..... a. .- •i • 33 ¢L 14 s Iy O TRENCH FENCE ON R= N Drsls^m+m P..r fum.. OF murR FENCE F.emc ON s.s. ]G e ... 0 s..ns°,.ss.w Ia,e°Idl. THE our...v .r. SECTION'A—A. 7¢ .LT.STEEL FENCE POSTS . SITE CROSS SECTION F �pl WOOD Pose RRxo waFER ° ° `4,, barrier. ..a svLE.,roR.,•zo.we+.s ,K Wty Ow e qTf FILTER FABRIC FENCE DETAIL �49 SIs PER CRY OF KNEW SID.OMR BM SURFACING m .Dr s Fr Hill QDEQDY mN ,.+� rrMD OVERFLOW `y�,''',.T>i> \i V,.,,, ,,, �i N ecuE �_ w .00mo TRuaENr 5 8Y I._ DST.NCE SOON .w El T I.M T ..°-:91 ENNND 2'BETNNC OEPIN �,a o I— °�DE EQUAL ELEVATION. L ° � 1.S'B.SEIRI STORAGE � — I- m i i €j,, idyll o R w IAI�Ik D IET m Rw R P TRUCK PARKING GRAVEL STORAGE AREA i g o Jl =ii�� D In „ s/r-,Vz-WASHED GRAM s`.•RDoc ^3 r r ra IL—,rIE FICCROeC1DAY cEartxmE O s Bum GRAVEL SURFACING SECTION Z F I - OM TRAP WY BE FORUM BY BERM CONVEYANCE OUTLET OR NOT 1D SCALE L2>:Z. 5 •LHD EEMEN OE=DN6 OR BY PAPAW.EXAM. LEVEL SPREADER a.ai. n CROSS SECTION a ROCK CHECK DAM DETAIL r1 'NYS FA NR PER CRY OF RENTON STD.DETAIL BM 1 IOiH Y'PU•CPU& GJ� dd T.ISe.P 0 J / £ Fi�ir- 1isg ".Y i lil��y k�n�n��� 3 Q u, Sired—_ 11"�•:'�. . tee!5�1=__ , _ -v'_ i. II_ns. e jig U t-1 .PIRESA6 E„ b'41 °. . ,I=111=11— =I I-11--T—r. 1�II,1 _I II II II�IrII I�In�iI I R -10-os 1 e:z g a•‘ s smm N DUDE U1P*- CITY OF RENTON . co _ITI _I MEP..PFTN.1E1Yr of PUBLIC _ F_•� r BERIND OEPM AND+'OEPR1 WORKS O<HED ROCK 1'OEPR1 W]/f-I/2' WASHED W m GRADING AND TESCP O TEMPORARY'V DITCH SEDIMENT TRAP OUTLET DETAIL NOTES AND DETAILS Z NOT TO SCALE m NOT TO SCALE0 oLE Mm -o.,D 1n4/03 _ ,p e ND. RPM. 0nE Amw,m GRECKEO a SCALE �aD6s.c .ae - U _._......, DffTC3 orr3 m i IRRIGATION PLAN }1Ie p i i _ - �i / . 0laOLL * - �' 5 t 0A- a z— S AZT fir — e QCO - n - h . Z r 240.03' S 24' 48' 09" E• e -•• •- ��� � • 4� „F 7.,:w eaow p� 1. O o s - "" dk• - Z _—— --- - - I IRRIGATION — AREA 'B' 8 '.. _SCALE.P-20, _1 SO Caravel O^'N / tmrt A•d No.Section Mein Una• • i �.t .n . e - - - Lire 00 ��0 L. DCVAB Master Control 0 ›•z 314.87' S 79' 14' 50" E sr:: . ng2 Water Metes % / - p '•\ /� L`� .-.� . Controller Located inside Transfer Station M O / �DH_�`T '\ 1 =J� g Control Valve,Ctd B Cep Existing Y g Qci i 1I �\� /�`��\\ — ,ino'a Liao and ControlV Wiring,vrinru Cr Q O jat,5 \ \° Q f ` IhN2^ 6✓� \ POIN 11 T OF CONNECTION '�\ `\ IRRIGATION - AREA 'A' • n .�i/ \ SCALES 1'-40' s) �\ ) '•y ` PROJECT NOTES _. SCALE:1'-20' I.ir:iu n o sr•rrre•m.w T:=VWrYt•um. c a4r'=144.rmVn=woe fool mm.•Im se• ate 333•3111.03. CC! > of I`• �� rmatt. :."..ra.ahe...a.��ermpnm..rmr.r.a.�rr tuatm. .`G u4•etutw••Vr•utt bt•t H o Mall.®wn..Is rarer e.ramie`iJm�>rtely .L a a 4{_ - ._.._.._.._._.. �..v.trmt - - EQUIPMENT I_EGEIVCI t ..m... . .t2r A•t•a.tom•ua-.Tx m E � I • • ATtiv II • CU• =_= 1 .00 CRY OF RENTON OEPA.iRMENT OP PUBLIC WOFKB / y� KEY PLAN 14ur•I- r4Fra tire(ua41701•W ,Uhe SrrAc COtow4 /• .\ :3 i, SCALE T.10o' _ frO 51yrNA STOTErL IRRIGATION PLAN • ♦ _ ._ • o� n.g— are avas/as r.Pr� r -.._ as MEM a .n a e ro® a ...,L2 2 u355S 45 CITY OF RENTON , f4 4,f, Planning/Building/Public Works tj 0 1 , -,..-1._ . it-4 .4. 0,,a...4 la ...s...................1 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 - q . 'I 0 2 •,4 'e -- 6 3 2 G. - k - . - - -'**Filactli f lita-CLSS SEA i :iN1 - 114122 til ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED , ' - ' '& ' ' '7. • ' n •:.,r,,:11:gif.tEl, ..... . des 7, * A 7213i96 11.s. POSTAGE : •Iglr-R; 1 • , - rovon, 11JO\ 11 ,. tar 84.NOFR k' OWRR&NavCo UNDEfir,; 44, PO Box 2500 Orij • 1DDREsse4844s Broomfield,CO 80020 TO poi:UMW imARD's -- • , . . iiiimioni• . • • - • -. • . - • • . -•' Y ��(Ss: O'et) ,.0 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: February 12,2002 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-02-013,ECF APPLICATION NAME: STONEWAY TRUCK PARKING/STORAGE AREA PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Stoneway Concrete, has requested to grade approximately 8,000 cubic yards of material on an existing 15.8-acre site, located in southwest Renton. The grading would allow for a more suitable site for construction equipment storage, while also enhancing internal access within the site. The project will • require environmental (SEPA) review. Access to the site is proposed in two locations from Monster Road SW. The applicant will also improve the existing on-site storm drainage system as required by code. No other building construction is planned at this time. PROJECT LOCATION: 501 Monster Road SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M;is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: January 28,2002 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: February 12,2002 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review Other Permits which may be required: City of Renton Grading Permit Requested Studies: Geotechnical Report,Drainage Analysis,&Wetland Evaluation Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: N/A CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Land Use: The subject site is designated Employment Area-Industrial(EAI)on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Heavy Industrial(IH)on the City's Zoning map. Based on the City's land use definitions,the storage facility would be a primary permitted use in the Heavy Industrial Zone. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: SEPA Checklist Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code,Public Works Standards,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: 1. Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 2. The applicant will be required to follow the recommendations contained with the Geotechnical Engineering Study prepared for this project with regard to the disturbance,preparation and construction of the site. NOTICE OF APPLICATION I Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jason E. Jordan, Associate Planner, Development 1 Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on February 26,2002. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any l decision on this project. 11 1 CONTACT PERSON: JASON E.JORDAN (425)430-7219 l II PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I �4 NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP I ' 3 � iy "1k ,I ---�.�t r I z 9 a sFG T �1 e' e % fa �a W b 4 .,� �... �P I— a II al 45. 9 NEF,, - E. • AS ATSTN- 17 Ib I \- wv ,�j1 kNo g a I_ dam• WWS ✓� °O sTo�- 8'. �'! si�ln 1. �r� 8 n i$ . •O l..T `(,,, 00 ' / • A , IL. 2 I`uQ' rt •S 3�'`4'@ z T DUW `O f5 '� u ;•. aY.: s.... �� ar�„ if _I J ... _ 1 ',. �w nr AM/qh o P w acu r--� S/ON Row,. 900....'I ' , uaRTIN _R '$ 4' % g ' J`rJeel�tr 'per p P ,. 4 t - .. -404 -.—E ) 3 12 Acres Gar �,.13 = ....�_._.�._.._ ..` i °. wr .. 7,7 ' Y b 37 3e �VN }. �o° 4,02. 5 • \3, 40 4 !3 u •.a \�se o�.- . - /iJ\4. 16 I I i� 'mo I / i/ T, ..- ' o � 4111 • lFifif 4 )34 tide 1B •.m`r`a O• I3 I` SSSSS /04/ /41 . ,iiIt • \. 0 �z -7 L��is`"m�9� (ry J■y + �'+� _ \° _ • s 'I/� _ 24�' /� A _ �"% :t.Ab��' / Z v. `� "- � ftDT OO \\__ • I' � 5 N- R c T O N TECHNICAL ..... I�,. 1/ . Lt,. •l ' 26--._ r.� \��,y��I:�+A ; .um /21 „.: ��ok iii,,,i If �j ¢ T 4r17___. 1 Ir \ f \ 4111311W Sal i p- / ‘:, • ., ._.— — "�a.-._. i ..eRIxa II 21' -.r ', Ecvt lel I _ _ _. 1 a..n o-�o-m ���`:+1 �`� R ``Y7.44 ��' oo✓I al z = 13ao Acres e-. uE°o Ai ''SAPS i/ °' tr �/\----.� NEIGHBORHOOD C pp° II If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. File No./Name: LUA-02-013,ECF/Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area NAME: I ', ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: II NOTICE OF APPLICATION 111 a 0 CITY OF RENT ON . ..:-. .4, `e7o `'--4-1 GA Planning/Building/Public Works Ai 0 W.).-^"...° f; 9; _at 0,4.1 42: a 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 rg 40.fr-, 1 PEg i 3'0 • o og.g4 :: ersg71 - 0 .3 2 ?. : '*1311511 FIRST-CMS, SEA tifi 9:21 la/4141- 22 pg ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED . so f4GTER t WA 7213196 U.S. POSTAGE .: Northern Pacific Railway Co 916 Smith Tower Seattle,WA 98104 0i.0(3 1 - 5 Fr.i i •-• •, ,,,-., VEABLE ,---------- ,J,...4? ... \ , JAJ 91 DDRESSE0 RABLE TO FORWARD ''-,:fr-•-•Ti 1-- 0:3 t i d C*1 A . . . . • ... . . • . . ,U .. .. ., : . .. i ii 'I ' - ' • . • ' - 1111';:11,1111mildlitilistitn . . • ' . . •-" ••••• i,... . ...:34,4.n r:ii ..e.:74-r..:•::;.::: • .-.. • • . • . • (--) • • ( Y O �u NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: February 12,2002 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-02-013,ECF APPLICATION NAME: STONEWAY TRUCK PARKING/STORAGE AREA PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Stoneway Concrete, has requested to grade approximately 8,000 cubic yards of material on an existing 15.8-acre site, located in southwest Renton. The grading would allow for a more suitable site for construction equipment storage, while also enhancing internal access within the site. The project will • require environmental (SEPA) review. Access to the site is proposed in two locations from Monster Road SW. The applicant will also improve the existing on-site storm drainage system as required by code. No other building construction is planned at this time. • PROJECT LOCATION: 501 Monster Road SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M uis likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: January 28,2002 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: February 12,2002 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review Other Permits which may be required: City of Renton Grading Permit Requested Studies: Geotechnical Report,Drainage Analysis,&Wetland Evaluation Location where application may befreviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: N/A CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Land Use: The subject site is designated Employment Area-Industrial(EAI)on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Heavy Industrial(IH)on the City's Zoning map. Based on the City's land use definitions,the storage facility would be a primary permitted use in the Heavy Industrial Zone. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: SEPA Checklist Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code,Public Works Standards,Uniform Building Code, Uniform Fire Code,and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. • Proposed Mitigation Measures: - 1. Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 2. The applicant will be required to follow the recommendations contained with the Geotechnical Engineering Study prepared for this project with regard to the disturbance,preparation and construction of the site. NOTICE OF APPLICATION I I Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jason E. Jordan,Associate Planner, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on February 26,2002. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: JASON E.JORDAN (425)430-7219 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION • NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP u.p. . yp ��[�� C� Yr d 4i x 6 I x„n ` nr,au, uu m a 1 E 3 a v,crr i T tl 71 . f v t r-?50• p4 —_—_ • b b ~4pr4•, �• ' ,f- my BUs C8 A.Z.cb '$]• Pi 41 i4P0 r. 0 HER v e' �\ .li /JST yr .{ 2] y 1 p +, '�Nc 5 rOT y I 2a..9 V. ', '.� oQ yyf nr su.1_ e -, T 14}gT Ir m x DUWAM/pjr P� • n'a „.... f wu. �r:'�—.L - .• f %ON ROUTE . ill • ,1 1 1 NARTIN _0 ♦r ./ °� rr"ja L A e . =R o .� 6.,ILAIT 4 ^ ae ° b, 1.,e 6 T 6 6 4 3 z 1 `39 40 4 43 44 ., \°0% •10 -' I /".---15 I -C p�'\ \ o, Fg7. '/9G 2 si 14 l,. ;--- I G> \ F 1g0 t ' 16 1 13 r V'.."75'' ' • 11/ pio. I lel,. , , . �r/�i`��.amr� i: rJ■r!■r �GAI.a��. ,� • s Tr/4,. � � ' �iR �- -•�\�, tib'I / L , i '_I" ��r�", °� Ot. O \\-___l I•� I l �1"I N 6 T o N TYE C N N 1 C A c T.30 usu r,,..--.,..k \ ' s''', 26.. .."icct..7,41.11U111111:*"..41 ., ,.,. tZ_ \' w p O 4 ,. \-- CENTER ' ... i4\s la.0't'.;...i..0 i - ,./' \ ,'I �ll�� GovY lnl�$' _ \'\ 1176 A<ru oe..mceOFRI?dIt.-1'WaS,,::.':f.1i2.tr 1 l.O 0• .i4.n4.0;."1yi-..7.2t,1,t 4t1",el'.a,./r../•' 0 SAPS ,, _ /i! vw` r.,,r .;ti\._, 14E BOBORH00D C 11 If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. File No./Name: LUA-02-013,ECF/Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: I I II NOTICE OF APPLICATION I 1 NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP 4,1 j c cES m° F°vr 1 2 3 4 5 cJ 7la p_ b dr r.,icuu a cmw - r.� C '+ e If._ ETit: ,, 0N • " ART�N1 ° ��! '' C@ �� `� ►" be e (i'IPPo u .4„, 1� uPa ffi,-{ �;} 0 0 +* NFRoMiN0 fv ° - /357N� �i' V \\,. 0 ^S 8 7 • 5rt e� ra I _ •cJ.�a O a ° ' ° ava l,rwar <.* A'! ill L'::!Lac 2 f p �� c •" - O .. ....,I. 3 .! MARTI rR - o° u°.+. ' .-_� _�L_A S,N RO(?E soo i , ' i, •_ % Ux AL �j• /4'S�I'°yMA1• Jl CriiiQr MAR mn.� • S 9 ,.. 4' 4 eue.`.°rpe l/ M. '�'00 /� ;W N I % � r 3 .,. :<"` 12 Acres ell /Gar �mllm-7°a.._., c i ,,.mLP�3C[rGUi „v, ` o.. ! `6 ro°0 8 7 • 6 5 4 3 2 I l C'UR, 34 \ :°o IT,E . c �OiN — e o _ � /o s __ • .° 41 11 42 liC ..., A ,i I, \-..-2,!,, „, . .. . po s\` 6\ 0 Fq T s� dT , u�1. ' rr' 29/1/I . 2e:.4./iiilL:":' � 19 fte,,,,„4:-e a`.a or • a.-; yeC 20 0 de �,�°F ra �•� b - •16 24 ' `. *ram _s .11:r•,'_,�+3�,0. �y rr.] • I . if i :il ° 3 \� 'on / Nxn°r MN PARCEL l - + CI '� I ��� `— I - - WA S�ri'I NG TON TECHNICAL Eras.r+ °14WE, \ �, fir° ti:a �f�c i '��y • A !: o - - .MONSTER ...0 ' . •,r� �r•�II ��� a� '\ �', � � .." \ CENTER 'or:;;`Bo CAM (7: fin" 2 A-.;.,,..4 sw NET r 4. I° `�t3 �:: •\ T 7.z. . ' �• W A 9 M I N G PY1l c lug •` r n Gov't Lot 2�.c':.'' \ - li7°Acres CITY OF H Ntes °1.+ ,� ea7 Acres \': \ - ---- 3�„u OEPAFiTMENT C lit • • "° `"�cw., r / �� . - . �11M�� rmcHBOPo-loos I--IN 12 � / / `. - \ f�- _ :-==� • .1✓ ` STONEWAY TRUCK PARKING/STORAGE AREA/LUA02-013 - PARTIES OF RECORD Suzanne Krom Herons Forever 47151 36th Avenue SW Seattle, WA 98126-2715 .4147/10 t/16-0 Last printed 03/04/02 11:15 AM AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Barbara Alther, first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL • 600 S.Washington Avenue,Kent,Washington 98032 , i NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL a daily newspaper published seven(7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal newspaper of DETERMINATION general publication and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW publication, referred to, printed andpublished in the English language continuallyas a dailyCOMMITTEE 9� RENTON,WASHINGTON newspaper in Kent, King County,Washington. The South County Journal has been approved as a . The Environmental Review, legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. , Committee has issued a, The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the South County Journal (and Determination of Non-Significance-, -_a,l not in supplemental form)which.was regularly distributed to the subscribers duringthe below Mitigated for the following project P 9 Y under the authority of the Renton; stated period. The annexed notice,a Municipal Code. STONEWAYTRUCK FACILITY • . Stoneway Truck Facility ', LUA02-013,ECF Environmental review for as published on: 3/11/02 ! proposed parking and storage facility.' Location: 501 Monster • The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$60.00, charged to d Road SW. 9 9 9 g Appeals of the' environmental Acct. No.8051067. determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM March 25,i The cost above includes a$6.00 fee for the printing of the affidavits. 2002. Appeals must be filed in I writing together with the required Legal Number 10121 i $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City' of Renton, 1055• Abi,e. ./ South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are I Legal Clerk, South County Journal governed by City of Renton 1 •Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the q� appeal- process may be obtained Subscribed and sworn before me on thisa ay ofrI/(L/fAL4 ,2002 from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. ``011111Ylliip�i (ald*A-raPublished .iri the South County .N��H..M. EFtiP,.i Journal March 11;,2002: 10121 � ��.; •�es10N Fa;,;�,e •,,- Notary Public of the State Washington e Q..Z°�` 9F�cam residing in Renton sic ,,,oiArn, :c,e King County,Washington ooeeq��c26 2p ,.4,..S. , {> CITY JF RENTON ..LL I .: Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 28, 2002 Mr. David Halinen Halinen Law Offices, P.S. 2115 N. 30th Street, Suite 203 Tacoma, WA 98403 SUBJECT: Stoneway Truck:Parking/Storage Project No. LUA-02=013, ECF Dear Mr. Halinen: This letter is to inform you. that ;the.;;appeal period '-has ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated fof:the'above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC.determination. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may.proceed: The applicant must.comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures. If you have any questions, please::feel free`to contact me at;(425),430-7219. For the Environmental Review Commiittee, /Jason E. Jo an Associate Planner cc: AnMarCo/Stoneway/Owners Suzanne Krom/Party of Record FINAL RENTON 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 AHEAD OF THE CURVE \, m This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer !/ f^'', �a :SAY O� Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Jason E.Jordan,Associate Planner,Development �,Lj �� Services Division,loss South G2dy Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on February 26,2002.II you have questions N`r about Ihls proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receNe additional nmification by mail,contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record end will be notified of any NOTICE OF APPLICATIONI decision en this project. AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- CONTACT PERSON: JASON E.JORDAN (425)430-7219 SIGNIFICANCE—MITIGATED(DNS-M) 1 I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION. i DATE: February 12,2002 'LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-02.013,ECF NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP APPLICATION NAME: STONEWAY TRUCK PARKING/STORAGE AREA ' , J --- 77 , , . . . . ,iti T •'t 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant,Stoneway Concrete,has requested to grade approximately 8,000 'Y" `y.� cubic yards of material on an existing 15.8-acre site,located In southwest Renton.The grading would allow fora more I „It"\ \ \ • L g 4. --Z, •:MA R-m�a Iti- �suitable site for construction equipment storage,while also enhancing interval access within the site. The project will i1 5 +�k., a N.V' - •• —,s—• � require environmental(SEPA)review. Access to the site is proposed in two locations from Monster Road SW. The ` ,o ' (8 • 1.' i• • •'. applicant will also Improve the existing on-site storm drainage system as required by code.No other building construction I puwayr 6. • e Y.• _ _- q . Is planned al this time. •• r• �`'" r a.m r ` �"' PROJECT LOCATION: 501 Monster Road SW - ••• \\ L ® a� ��J-',._¢ —°""" s 3 OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DOS-M):As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton j °0� `. \\ r _ r r r -- 'has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project.Therefore,as II - • 1 *lig " • ' ' r ' .. permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton Is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- ,i I M Is likely to be Issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are Integrated Into a single comment it ,' — . I period.There will be no comment period following the Issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance- 'Mitigated(ONS-M).A 14-day appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS-M. , PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: January 28,2002 I � II� \, '!y, Qlr" q 1 ' AM NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: February 12,2002 [ � •--/-' Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review ' r� \ , C,/- • T Other Permits which may be required: City of Renton Grading Permit �¢\e 1; ��)�N/III /�0a ,\ o 0 � ' .�,No p e n 0. 10-. ...-�• 1:201k, '. gyp Requested Studies: Gealechnlcal Report,Drainage Analysis,8 Wetland Evaluation , " f J r r' ` try �, -..- Location 'k !'lou�r� ,+...i., .tt[(�!� '�i/ !(tlul `'. , -:, where application may 1 4.r-0 j7 I :"1#6 1' s F . -, be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, .�l� ��i \-" v� -y� 1055 South Grad Way,Renton,WA 98055 ', / �JJ e' /� r y C 1711t��fgh •P • `. : 1� '4.� . PUBLIC HEARING: N/A n y t . �y, l .- A CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: ,-wsW Analytical process �1 1 \.� � a `` /� ce' p, ` !say /, reomtomr Land Use: The subject site is designated Employment Area-Industrial(EAI)on the City's 0 s,�, •• _ -- Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Heavy Industrial(IH)on the City's 0 'LM \ ,pl ,. Zoning map.Based on the Cites land use definitions,the storage facility would bee primary permitted use In the Heavy Industrial Zone. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: SEPA Checklist Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the Cilys SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code,Public If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further Information on this proposed project,complete Works Standards,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fee Code,and other thisfy form and tte to of party o,Development g, Grady y, applicable codes end regulations as appropriate. City pment Planning,1055 So. Way,Renton,WA 98055. File NoJName:LUA-02-013,ECF/Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area Proposed Mitigation Measures: *I. Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures shall he Installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the NAME: representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. ADDRESS: 2. The applicant will be required to follow the recommendations contained with the Geotechnical Engineenng Study prepared for this project with regard to the disturbance,preparation and construction of the site. TELEPHONE NO.: NOTICE OF APPLICATION -- - - - - - - - NOTICE OF APPLICATION - CERTIFICATION I, EGitziod in aisJyto , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by e in conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on lit /21 2.0.02 - Signed: ATTEST:Subscribed an. sworn before me,a Notary Public,in and for the Sta of Wa h �,gtgp. toe,_.. =m__,. ,on the 1 L/eY4+ day of 2 g r Z, i;,..;; ;51.YN KAMCHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC \ MATE OF WASHINGTON . MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES ' MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 „UNE 29, 2003 / ,�< - - --— ____ _ _ _ _ 1 NomE, ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION STONEWAY TRUCK PARKING AND STORAGE FACILITY LUA-02-013,ECF The proposed project would Include grading and filling along with the operation of a construction equipment storage area.The project would encompass approximately 4-acres on the 15.5-acre site and wouland filing would provide a suitable Involve 8,000 cubb yards of grading storage/and parking area forons7,100 truccton equards of ipment,t whil The era also enlarging the existing on-ails storm wafer detention facility.The proposal Includes paving the 25-foot wide primary access drive from Monster Road SW;however,all other project areas would have a crushed gravel surface.No new structures are proposed with this development.In addition to the requested grading,the applicant has proposed to screen the site with a 15-foot wide sight obscuring landscaped area along the project's northeastern boundary(abutting Monster Road SW and Beacon Coal Mine Road).Location:501 Monster road SW, THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE(EPIC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM March 25,2002. Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained tram the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-430-6510- • NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP y Via.^8 © r•' ,, `.L. sn ]R . I",.„• 1..- ,11 I. 1-4 e.71 getr • 1 (ii----" \*1110 ---- , .• •------C-7-- 181 1111W",,ti Afi' . 4:-:. • Iftft ' ' s ** $11 :41,\,.VP' 0 milk Ira , 1 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT . SERVICES DIVISION 430-7219. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT)PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification. • i _ I CERTIFICATION 3 I, E U-z el l I, hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by A in conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on 2�0 • Signed G)h 7C GPirvt(� j ATTEST: Subscribed an sworn before me,a Notary Public,in and for the tate of . MARILYN l`�� on the / 1/"Y1• day of�y�C �D,. 7 ODD NOTARY PUBLIC MARILYN KAMCHEFF STATE OF WASHINGTON MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES: 6-29-03 COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 29, 2003 ......:::�.::::.:::::::.:�:4:.:j• ii'.:i:if::ti i:}}:};:ii jfii:ri ........... .:::.:.,:f.::k::.Cl.'i('�F..O :REi� ..............?...:.:.::.�:::.:....:. .::>..::::. ': V ��">':i::i::{'r:::r.}}::ri:i7ii%'r,:i::ti.'•::'�}'F.:::k:}:. :?.,?.fr..:.::.::r:?.i:,...>::: • 10.11Eittib#111,4014KOUINPINAIRENtggitrn.hitodimorign :: :}: }`r}'?:;........ r:}::.....:•.4..''::":'::x.:::• :.n..n...::..••:;;.r.r...:::.f'r?•}}}}:{Y2:::}:: >siib ec`.t>:5 ......r.:::.::::::.r..::}:..?.i:.i;:.}:::}::>}i'.}:..:.:.::::::.:.}'•:?.i:.}:?.}:.:�:?.ii:?4:?.:?.;snr..........?�:.:::::.::.::....:..:.::....... 1.. PROJECT NAME: Stoneway Tr uck';Parkinq/Storacre Area • APPLICATION NO: Lu a, • 02 -QI 3 C The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. • NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER See attached. • OE VELOs={'flaa`1T ELaE`,NI;v , CITY OF REN TadN • • JAN262092 • (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • • Applicant Certification 1, David L. Halinen , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property • (Print Name) ,�p111111III/I°1 owners and their addresses were obtained from: ��•��ASIC IA es° D City of Renton Technical Services Records �.••Q,..% 10N• p49-;G% Title Company Records s4 OTARV - King County Assessors Records —0,<= = Signed t.1/J�.2i Date 1/25/02 :9J•'-.o'; J�, '`C,. Agent for (Applic t) �'e,i OF WW1 "z.� IIII/IIIIp$% NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, - residing at -TAC',9M,A- on theA54 day of UkOUARY , isA Signed GC/(0c__ . (Notary Public)r9C1 IAt bh/0 — • • o tv to s U ............................::::??:?:???}::o::;..�::.�::.�:.�::::::::::::::;::.} ... . ...:... ...,•.;....:.:+. ::''S:••:?.;":t,.:}:t't:;•:{..x..v..:�.:�::•:::::.t,>:•?::.:cam :�iii•}:.}::iti4t;::}i?:v}:•?:t�i}•}:vi:v}:•}:?i'::..i::i:'.•}:•????:4:3?:ti•??:?:tii:v?:�i??: :: :' i .w•y?t.:i:•?'•.'{�'a.....�..... t. . .>::.?>>:.?.+:.;:.:;.::.:;:.:.:�:.?:.;;??'.:.�:.;'::.::.;:tv.t•:?:•}}:••:c.:.;:.>:.:;?:.;:.::.;??;•.::::. E. � L .....L.:..At...f, A..' .. . i.>•. :::::is;:t;;;:;:;:;.;;:.;:.>::.>. C RTIFI.CATION.;OF.MAILIN� t..,, ? �,.:..:.:. (:.:.. : ::: : ::. air .Win. .....................:::t.....:.. 1 >s, >'•, et f ?': ;0-Lige #3'hereby:;certify.::..hat:;notices:af.the ro t , :: ...:::::.: ........:........... ....:. .. .. ... .'::... •......:.........::.:.:::k�'if::: :.::. ...::..:::.�:.::.�:..::.:.::..�:::.,..:::..:.::.:: . .• :i.:� 'a0`!c�B:.F��.�'.�V;{A-;;x,v.t;..4,r..:§��'`:a�::•::. c:::;::::?:i::: :•::�.;. stecj.. :r e.. .;:.awn.er.:.:ort.:::�>�.•��.�:t:.��-...�::.:::..>.:..tt::::::::::::::::::::.:..:.: F.:::.�::;::::..:..t.x.::.::�;ti:..: ......:.,..... ..... ' :;•}}:•::Y::�>:i:;::::S:i:%::::Sk;:<::::�:>:{;S}:::::::t::;:� iS<?Si:;::i:;::�}::<::? ;;;:%::::i;i:;::;:;:::;;::;;;:p ;:;::::5:,:;:t::;,y::;2;':::>:i:i!i:2::ii::::::::::::. ..:•i;::+:'r:i::;y<:ii iii`:<i,:'::;:y?':::'::":i:?::•,:i:Ji:;ii.:`:;:,}te i: ::: ':I::::i::':: . ..:.......... . ....:::.::....::.............:..:.:;:}::»::;:>:>::>::>::;gate..:.:..:...:z�✓.�.ta: �?:.��:.::..::::::::.;.;'::.>:.>::.};:?:.:;:.;';:.::t.}:.:::.:<.:;??:.:::.::>::' N OT��: Q TEST;>rii ubscribp1?:q ;:;sorri::.before::me`.?a°Nota:: :.publtc ::1 :::and:.f ::::;t»: ::::..: : :.:;> >':>.. .:::.?>;:;.::..::•:>::t. ;.:»:.? :::::::::: :::: :::::..:..:.+.::.:.�:.::: :r.Y.::.::..........�..�.......:....:::oc.,t(i@..Stata:.of.:.Washin ton:..:::.:::. „es ding: ..:....:..:::..�..,c,>f r;::::•.:::..::....:::« on;the :,;_:;:::::.T :da :.of:;':>'.>::>:::,:::.:•?: . ..}.::. ::' .> :•:::•::.::: < . . .................... g ed �'�_ .,... ::... . . 6 a MLYN:mmekieFF >� >;:. i tell//4 'uiij I MENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 Ilstprop.doo REV 07/95 2 ` = MetroScan/King (WA) Parcel Number Owner Name Site Address YB Owner Phone 142304 9001 Raykovich Phillip S 6700 S Langston Rd Seattle 98178 1965 142304 9002 Sounthala Prany/Homeone 6621 S 128Th St Seattle 98178 142304 9006 Anderson Joseph B&Mary A 6500 S 132Nd St Seattle 98178 206-244-7466 142304 9008 O W R R&Nav Co 13001 Beacon Coal Mine Rd S Renton 142304 9036 Brown Tommy L 6719 S Langston Rd Seattle 98178 1969 142304 9042 O W R R&Nav Co 13001 Beacon Coal Mine Rd S Tukwila 142304 9043 Northern Pacific Railway Co 12901 Beacon Coal Mine Rd S Tukwila 981 142304 9044 Anmarco 13003 Beacon Coal Mine Rd S Tukwila 377920 0045 Hughes L P&Mary Ellen 500 Monster Rd SW Renton 98055 425-454-0848 377920 0050 Anmarco 6900 S Beacon Coal Mine Rd Renton 377920 0090 City Of Renton 7100 S Charles St Renton 1971 377920 0090 City Of Renton 7100 S Charles St Renton 1971 377920 0119 First City Developments Corp *No Site Address*Renton 377920 0120 Anmarco 6900 S 140Th St Redmond 98052 377920 0150 Anmarco 515 Monster Rd SW Renton 98055 1966 377920 0155 Union Pacific Railroad Co 13001 Beacon Coal Mine Rd S Tukwila 377920 0170 Hughes L P&Mary Ellen 500 Monster Rd SW Seattle 98178 425-454-0848 377920 0180 Hughes L P&Mary Ellen 500 Monster Rd SW Seattle 98178 425-454-0848 377920 0190 Hughes L P&Mary Ellen 500 Monster Rd SW Seattle 98178 425-454-0848 377920 0200 Hughes L P&Mary Ellen 500 Monster Rd SW Seattle 98178 425-454-0848 377920 0210 Hughes L P&Mary Ellen 500 Monster Rd SW Seattle 98178 425-454-0848 377920 0237 Brownrigg Donald La Mere 13802 Beacon Coal Mine Rd S Seattle 9817 1949 206-772-3025 377920 0241 Bardon William C&Mary F 13728 Beacon Coal Mine Rd S Seattle 9817 1985 206-246-1582 377920 0255 City Of Tukwila 14001 Beacon Coal Mine Rd S Tukwila 722950 0281 City Of Renton 1110 Monster Rd SW Renton 98055 722950 0310 State Of Washington 14298 68Th Ave S Renton 722950 0320 Anmarco 540 Monster Rd SW Seattle 98178 722950 0330 O W R R&Nav Co 13001 Beacon Coal Mine Rd S Renton • Information compiled from various sources.Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. 1 , ,,..... rio . , . ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION STONEWAY TRUCK PARKING AND STORAGE FACILITY LUA-02-013,ECF The proposed project would include grading and filling along with the operation of a construction equipment storage area.The project would encompass approximately 4-acres on the 15.8-acre site and would involve 8,000 cubic yards of grading and approximately 7,100 cubic yards of filling. The grading and filling would provide a suitable(level)storage/parking area for construction equipment,while also enlarging the existing on-site storm water detention facility. The proposal includes paving the 25-foot wide primary access drive from Monster Road SW;however,all other project areas would have a crushed gravel surface. No new structures are proposed with this development. In addition to the requested grading,the applicant has proposed to screen the site with a 15-foot wide sight obscuring landscaped area along the project's northeastern boundary(abutting Monster Road SW and Beacon Coal Mine Road). Location: 501 Monster road SW. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM March 25, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner,City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-430-6510. , NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP 3 O Z T- t� rarh, ,z4 m �CQ• 7 �p�y� v 0,04 4 ` :, d1 N)N sr r'• l. p� (may �` C_ a or i 6 j DU M/Sy ,v $. CV ."` ..... "" v - 4 9 •a FI+2. 4.-': !� �� rat' t'. oar 9. 8 1 E ! 4 ] 2 ! ,84 - C•UR� , , i n e*......L." \\\. , • , 0,..........C..44. , ' -Mak \\..# -,..,./,,z>*,----,-.. r, 1 . . \ N\ ''''t 0,/,471: vi.. - , r/-,:k _ ,,,,„„...,„,• ...,,,,, \ . „„. ..,,,/A116 0 ,,,,,,-,-, ...,,... r liYtto ..„ \\- ,', --, ,, ...,, ____,_ , , �,�► i,.,l it /* ' \ t'l ..tiro I-,l a.ax recx. „,„xic.. .". 1 / cull -1\ 3`� ii g sa�b r tv �gg. „- a-rr ' • Tj" •....1,W ✓ti�VY 4 \ nor i fill i 1 a y4 t a 117 I - ��.'°- roilv µCrlY OF III �s to' � �'a:Z.' i .' ": i= lm�moleaooc FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7219. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. STONEWAY TRUCK FACILITY LUA02-013,ECF Environmental review for proposed parking and storage facility. Location: 501 Monster Road SW. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM March 25, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. Publication Date: March 11,2002 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot • CITY 'F RENTON ..IL I Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department 7 e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 7, 2002 Mr. David Halinen Halinen Law Offices, P.S,. 2115 N. 30th Street, Suite 203 Tacoma,WA 98403 SUBJECT: Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Project No. LUA-02-013,ECF Dear Mr. Halinen: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM March 25, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, Jason E.Jordan Associate Planner cc: AnMarCo/Stoneway/Owners Suzanne Krom/Party of Record Enclosure di-ma otterR E T ® ITT 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 AHEAD OF THE CURVE �..� This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-013, ECF APPLICANT: Stoneway Concrete/Gary Merlino PROJECT NAME: Stoneway Truck Parking and Storage Area DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposed project would include grading and filling along with the operation of a construction equipment storage area. The project would encompass approximately 4- acres on the 15.8-acre site and would involve 8,000 cubic yards of grading and approximately 7,100 cubic yards of filling. The grading and filling would provide a suitable (level) storage/parking area for construction equipment, while also enlarging the existing on-site storm water detention facility. The proposal includes paving the 25-foot wide primary access drive from Monster Road SW; however, all other project areas would have a crushed gravel surface. No new structures are proposed with this development. In addition to the requested grading, the applicant has proposed to screen the site with a 15-foot wide sight obscuring landscaped area along the project's northeastern boundary(abutting Monster Road SW and Beacon Coal Mine Road. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 501 Monster Road SW MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical Report prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc. dated January 18, 2002, with regard to site preparation and development activities. 2. Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division. jII 91 mitigationmeasures CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-013, ECF APPLICANT: Stoneway Concrete/Gary Merlino PROJECT NAME: Stoneway Truck Parking and Storage Area DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposed project would include grading and filling along with the operation of a construction equipment storage area. The project would encompass approximately 4- acres on the 15.8-acre site and would involve 8,000 cubic yards of grading and approximately 7,100 cubic yards of filling. The grading and filling would provide a suitable (level) storage/parking area for construction equipment, while also enlarging the existing on-site storm water detention facility. The proposal includes paving the 25-foot wide primary access drive from Monster Road SW; however, all other project areas would have a crushed gravel surface. No new structures are proposed with this development. In addition to the requested grading, the applicant has proposed to screen the site with a 15-foot wide sight obscuring landscaped area along the project's northeastern boundary(abutting Monster Road SW and Beacon Coal Mine Road. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 501 Monster Road SW Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental-determinations. • FIRE 1. Remove the single family structure that is stored on the lot. 2. Verify the two aboveground tanks have been cleaned and inerted. PLAN REVIEW WATER 1. The proposed project is located in the 196-water pressure zone. The project is located outside the Aquifer Protection Zone. 2. Water System Development Charges are not required. 3. A separate permit for water meters will be required. • SANITARY SEWER 1. Sewer System Development Charges are not required. SURFACE WATER 1. Surface Water System Development Charges are not required. 2. During the months of October 1st through April 30th, a special erosion control measure during the rainy season will be required. s. Stoneway Truck Parking/5:....ge T LUA-02-01 3,EC F Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 2 TRANSPORTATION 1. A traffic control plan will be required to be submitted to the Development Services Division for review and approval prior to construction activity on the site. GENERAL 1. If necessary, a separate utility permit to cut and cap existing utilities to the singe family structure will be required as part of the demolition and removal per the Fire Department. 2. If any rockeries/retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height are to be constructed as part of this site, a separate building permit will be required. The following notes shall be included on the civil: "A licensed engineer with geotechnical expertise must be retained for proposed rockeries greater than 4 feet in height. The engineer must monitor construction in general accordance with ARC standards and with his/her supplemental recommendations, in a professional manner and of competent and suitable material." Written verification by the engineer must be provided to the City of Renton Public Works Inspector prior to approval of an occupancy permit. PLANNING 1. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance bythe Development Services Division. 2. Construction activities are limited by RMC4-4-030C and shall be restricted to the hours between 7 a.m. and 8 p.m. M-F. Saturday between the hours of 9 a.m. and 8 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday. 3. A 15-foot sight-obscuring landscaping strip is required along the subject site's north and eastern property boundary abutting Monster Road SW and Beacon Coal Mine Road. The landscaping plan submitted with the land use permit; which demonstrates how the sight-obscuring landscaping strip would be achieved, is acceptable. advisorynotes 4'1' . C T �PF RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 7, 2002 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on March 5, 2002: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED STONEWAY TRUCK PARKING AND STORAGE FACILITY LUA-02-013,ECF The proposed project would include grading and filling along with the operation of a construction equipment storage area. The project would encompass approximately 4-acres on the 15.8-acre site and would involve 8,000 cubic yards of grading and approximately 7,100 cubic yards of filling. The grading and filling would provide a suitable (level) storage/parking area for construction equipment, while also enlarging the existing on-site storm water detention facility. The proposal includes paving the 25-foot wide primary access drive from Monster Road SW; however, all other project areas would have a crushed gravel surface. No new structures are proposed with this development. In addition to the requested grading, the applicant has proposed to screen the site with a 15-foot wide sight obscuring landscaped area along the project's northeastern boundary(abutting Monster Road SW and Beacon Coal Mine Road). Location: 501 Monster road SW. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM March 25, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, I J on E. Jordan Associate Planner cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) US Army Corp. of Engineers Enclosure Agencyletten F-79�� 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 �` d ` AHEAD OF THE CURVE ,* This paper contains50%recycled material,30%post consumer F CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-013, ECF APPLICANT: Stoneway Concrete/Gary Merlino PROJECT NAME: Stoneway Truck Parking and Storage Area DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposed project would include grading and filling along with the operation of a construction equipment storage area. The project would encompass approximately 4- acres on the 15.8-acre site and would involve 8,000 cubic yards of grading and approximately 7,100 cubic yards of filling. The grading and filling would provide a suitable (level) storage/parking area for construction equipment, while also enlarging the existing"on-site storm water detention facility. The proposal includes paving the 25-foot wide primary access drive` from Monster Road SW; however, all other project areas would have a crushed gravel surface. No new structures are proposed with this development. In addition to the requested grading; the applicant has proposed to screen the site with a 15-foot wide sight obscuring landscaped area along the project's northeastern boundary (abutting Monster Road SW and Beacon Coal Mine'Road. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 501 Monster Road SW MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical Report prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc. dated January 18, 2002, with regard to site preparation and development activities. 2. Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division. it mitigationmeasures CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-013, ECF APPLICANT: Stoneway Concrete/Gary Merlino PROJECT NAME: Stoneway Truck Parking and Storage Area DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposed project would include grading and filling along with the operation of a construction equipment storage area. The project would encompass approximately 4- acres on the 15.8-acre site and would involve 8,000 cubic yards of grading and approximately 7,100 cubic yards of filling. The grading and filling would provide a suitable (level) storage/parking area for construction equipment, while also enlarging the existing on-site storm water detention facility. The proposal includes paving the 25-foot wide primary access drive from Monster Road SW; however, all other project areas would have a crushed gravel surface. No new structures are proposed with this development. In addition to the requested grading, the applicant has proposed to screen the site with a 15-foot wide sight obscuring landscaped area along the project's northeastern boundary (abutting Monster Road SW and Beacon Coal Mine.Road. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 501 Monster Road SW Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided.:in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided,as information only; they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations FIRE 1. Remove the single family structure that is stored on the lot. 2. Verify the two aboveground tanks have been cleaned and inerted. PLAN REVIEW WATER 1. The proposed project is located in the 196-water pressure zone. The project is located outside the Aquifer Protection Zone. 2. Water System Development Charges are not required. 3. A separate permit for water meters will be required. SANITARY SEWER 1. Sewer System Development Charges are not required. SURFACE WATER 1. Surface Water System Development Charges are not required. 2. During the months of October 1st through April 30th, a special erosion control measure during the rainy season will be required. Stoneway Truck Parking/S2�rage LUA-02-01 3,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 2 TRANSPORTATION 1. A traffic control plan will be required to be submitted to the Development Services Division for review and approval prior to construction activity on the site. GENERAL 1. If necessary, a separate utility permit to cut and cap existing utilities to the singe family structure will be required as part of the demolition and removal per the Fire Department. 2. If any rockeries/retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height are to be constructed as part of this site, a separate building permit will be required. The following notes shall be included on the civil: "A licensed engineer with gm expertise must be retained for proposed rockeries greater than 4 feet in height. The engineer must monitor construction in general accordance with ARC standards and with his/her supplemental recommendations, in a professional manner and of competent and suitable material." Written verification by the engineer must be provided to the City of Renton Public Works Inspector prior to approval of an occupancy permit. PLANNING 1. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 2. Construction activities are limited by RMC4-4-030C and shall be restricted to the hours between 7 a.m. and 8 p.m. M-F. Saturday between the hours of 9 a.m. and 8 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday. 3. A 15-foot sight-obscuring landscaping strip is,required along the subject site's north and eastern property boundary abutting Monster Road SW and Beacon Coal Mine Road. The landscaping plan submitted with the land use permit, which demonstrates how the sight-obscuring landscaping strip would be achieved, is acceptable. advisorynotes 1 • -4., CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-013, ECF APPLICANT: Stoneway Concrete/Gary Merlino PROJECT NAME: Stoneway Truck Parking and Storage Area DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposed project would include grading and filling along with the operation of a construction equipment storage area. The project would encompass approximately 4- acres on the 15.8-acre site and would involve 8,000 cubic yards of grading and approximately 7,100 cubic yards of filling. The grading and filling would provide a suitable (level) storage/parking area for construction equipment, while also enlarging the existing on-site storm water detention facility. The proposal includes paving the 25-foot wide primary access drive from Monster Road SW; however, all other project areas would have a crushed gravel surface. No new structures are proposed with this development. In addition to the requested grading, the applicant has proposed to screen the site with a 15-foot wide sight obscuring landscaped area along the project's northeastern boundary (abutting Monster Road SW and Beacon Coal Mine Road. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 501 Monster Road SW LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM March 25, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: March 11,2002 DATE OF DECISION: March 05, 2002 SIGNATURES: 7 / gl: /( �. Grr gg Zin) m , Administrator DATE t Department f Piannin /Buildin /Public Works p 9 9 Airrl Shepherd, Administrator DATE (( Community Services Lee=Wheeler, Fire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department dnsmsignature CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-013, ECF APPLICANT: Stoneway Concrete/Gary Merlino PROJECT NAME: Stoneway Truck Parking and Storage Area DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposed project would include grading and filling along with the operation of a construction equipment storage area. The project would encompass approximately 4- acres on the 15.8-acre site and would involve 8,000 cubic yards of grading and approximately 7,100 cubic yards of filling. The grading and filling would provide a suitable (level) storage/parking area for construction equipment, while also enlarging the existing on-site storm water detention facility. The proposal includes paving the 25-foot wide primary access drive from Monster Road SW; however, all other project areas would have a crushed gravel surface. No new structures are proposed with this development. In addition to the requested grading, the applicant has proposed to screen the site with a 15-foot wide sight obscuring landscaped area along the project's northeastern boundary (abutting Monster Road SW and Beacon Coal Mine Road. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 501 Monster Road SW LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM March 25, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: March 11, 2002 DATE OF DECISION: March 05, 2002 SIGNATURES: ° /(2 Z- 4wr 4Itftlf DATE . Department f P anning/Building/Public Works h rd Administ • DATE 77 i Shep e , Community Services z ee h eler, Fire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department dnsmsignature CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-013, ECF APPLICANT: Stoneway Concrete/Gary Merlino PROJECT NAME: Stoneway Truck Parking and Storage Area DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposed project would include grading and filling along with the operation of a construction equipment storage area. The project would encompass approximately 4- acres on the 15.8-acre site and would involve 8,000 cubic yards of grading and approximately 7,100 cubic yards of filling. The grading and filling would provide a suitable (level) storage/parking area for construction equipment, while also enlarging the existing on-site storm water detention facility. The proposal includes paving the 25-foot wide primary access drive from Monster Road SW; however, all other project areas would have a crushed gravel surface. No new structures are proposed with this development. In addition to the requested grading, the applicant has proposed to screen the site with a 15-foot wide sight obscuring landscaped area along the project's northeastern boundary (abutting Monster Road SW and Beacon Coal Mine Road. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 501 Monster Road SW MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical Report prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc. dated January 18, 2002, with regard to site preparation and development activities. 2. Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division. mitigationmeasures CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-013, ECF APPLICANT: Stoneway Concrete/Gary Merlino PROJECT NAME: Stoneway Truck Parking and Storage Area DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposed project would include grading and filling along with the operation of a construction equipment storage area. The project would encompass approximately 4- acres on the 15.8-acre site and would involve 8,000 cubic yards of grading and approximately 7,100 cubic yards of filling. The grading and filling would provide a suitable (level) storage/parking area for construction equipment, while also enlarging the existing on-site storm water detention facility. The proposal includes paving the 25-foot wide primary access drive from Monster Road SW; however, all other project areas would have a crushed gravel surface. No new structures are proposed with this development. In addition to the requested grading, the applicant has proposed to screen the site with a 15-foot wide sight obscuring landscaped area along the project's northeastern boundary(abutting Monster Road SW and Beacon Coal Mine Road. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 501 Monster Road SW Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. FIRE 1. Remove the single family structure that is stored on the lot. 2. Verify the two aboveground tanks have been cleaned and inerted. PLAN REVIEW WATER 1. The proposed project is located in the 196-water pressure zone. The project is located outside the Aquifer Protection Zone. 2. Water System Development Charges are not required. 3. A separate permit for water meters will be required. SANITARY SEWER 1. Sewer System Development Charges are not required. SURFACE WATER 1. Surface Water System Development Charges are not required. 2. During the months of October 1st through April 30th, a special erosion control measure during the rainy season will be required. Stoneway Truck Parking/Stora,., LUA-02-013,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 2 TRANSPORTATION 1. A traffic control plan will be required to be submitted to the Development Services Division for review and approval prior to construction activity on the site. GENERAL 1. If necessary, a separate utility permit to cut and cap existing utilities to the singe family structure will be required as part of the demolition and removal per the Fire Department. 2. If any rockeries/retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height are to be constructed as part of this site, a separate building permit will be required. The following notes shall be included on the civil: "A licensed engineer with geotechnical expertise must be retained for proposed rockeries greater than 4 feet in height. The engineer must monitor construction in general accordance with ARC standards and with his/her supplemental recommendations, in a professional manner and of competent and suitable material." Written verification by the engineer must be provided to the City of Renton Public Works Inspector prior to approval of an occupancy permit. PLANNING 1. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 2. Construction activities are limited by RMC4-4-030C and shall be restricted to the hours between 7 a.m. and 8 p.m. M-F. Saturday between the hours of 9 a.m. and 8 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday. 3. A 15-foot sight-obscuring landscaping strip is required along the subject site's north and eastern property boundary abutting Monster Road SW and Beacon Coal Mine Road. The landscaping plan submitted with the land use permit, which demonstrates how the sight-obscuring landscaping strip would be achieved, is acceptable. advisorynotes •0%, , CITY "F RENTON -IL Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 4, 2002 • Suzanne Krom Herons Forever 47151/2 36th Avenue SW Seattle, WA 98126-2715 SUBJECT: Stoneway Truck Parking & Storage Area Project No. LUA-02-013,ECF Dear Ms. Krom: Thank you for the letter dated February 26, 2002 regarding your concerns associated with the above-mentioned proposal. 'Currently, City Staff has reviewed the project and prepared a report for the City's Environmental Review Committee (ERC). The ERC is expected to issue an Environmental Determination on' March 5, 2002. Once a determination has been issued, youwill be notified of the decision. Please trust that the information provided in your letter will be taken into consideration prior to any decision and/or recommendation on this land use:action. . If you have not already been made a party-of-record, you will:now become one based on your letter. I also wanted to take this opportunity to inform you that the City does not have a process in place to make you a party of record for all projects in a certain geographic area. In stead, you will need to continue to monitor the City's website, the South County Journal and any new project posters that may be placed on.or near a.:proposal. If you have any additional questions or comments regarding this matter, please contact me at (425) 430- 7219. Sinc rely, Jason i . Jordan Associate Planner .. cc: Yellow file H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.ING\PR R E N T O1`V 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 1 4.16 AHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE MARCH 05, 2002 CONSENT AGENDA To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Jim Shepherd, Communities Services Director Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: Jennifer Henning, Development Planning Meeting Date: Tuesday, March 05, 2002. Time: 9:00 AM Location: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Agenda listed below. PLEASE NOTE: THIS IS A CONSENT AGENDA ONLY. THERE WILL BE NO ERC MEETING. Stoneway Truck Parking and Storage Facility (Jordan) L UA-02-013,ECF The proposed project would include grading and filling along with the operation of a construction equipment storage area. The project would encompass approximately 4-acres on the 15.8-acre site and would involve 8,000 cubic yards of grading and approximately 7,100 cubic yards of filling. The grading and filling would provide a suitable (level) storage/parking area for construction equipment, while also enlarging the existing on- site storm water detention facility. The proposal includes paving the 25-foot wide primary access drive from Monster Road SW; however, all other project areas would have a crushed gravel surface. No new structures are proposed with this development. In addition to the requested grading, the applicant has proposed to screen the site with a 15-foot wide sight obscuring landscaped area along the project's northeastern boundary (abutting Monster Road SW and Beacon Coal Mine Road). Location: 501 Monster Road SW. cc: J.Tanner,Mayor J.Covington,Chief Administrative Officer S.Carlson, EDNSP Administrator A. Pietsch, EDNSP Director ® J.Gray,Fire Prevention N.Watts,P/B/PW Development Services Director ® F.Kaufman,Hearing Examiner L. Rude, Fire Prevention ® J.Medzegian/Council S.Meyer,P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director R.Lind,EDNSP L.Warren,City Attorney ® STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE March 5, 2002 Project Name Stoneway Truck Parking and Storage Area Applicant Gary Merlino Stoneway Concrete 9125 10 Avenue South Seattle,WA 98108 File Number LUA-02-013, ECF Project Manager Jason E. Jordan Project Description The proposed project would include grading and filling along with the operation of a construction equipment storage area. The project would encompass approximately 4-acres on the 15.8-acre site and would involve 8,000 cubic yards of grading and approximately 7,100 cubic yards of filling. The grading and filling would provide a suitable (level) storage/parking area for construction equipment, while also enlarging the existing on-site storm water detention facility. The proposal includes paving the 25-foot wide primary access drive from Monster Road SW; however, all other project areas would have a crushed gravel surface. No new structures are proposed with this development. In addition to the requested grading, the applicant has proposed to screen the site with a 15-foot wide sight obscuring landscaped area along the project's northeastern boundary (abutting Monster Road SW and Beacon Coal Mine Road). Project Location The site is located at 501 Monster Road SW Exist. Bldg.Area gsf N/A Proposed New Bldg.Area gsf N/A Site Area 15.8 acres Total Building Area gsf N/A RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated. rvtiUhrsOHHUUD DETAIL MAP 0\ �� m�S . ouwAm, _R v. sy L ', f W - G •d.��^ /.��._}1���, , a p 4'. r. ooLE , . \/A lk, I I 1 Agilik/.\\\%t 4 :,,,,,4. £qn, ¢ i i„, w FqT��= r i s-.Ilea, \ \ l' „,,,,,_ "� s� � z 4* 11111 ERCRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environment .3view Committee Staff Report STONEWAY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA LUA-02-011,ECF REPORT OF March 5,2002 Page 2 of 5 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF X DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with a 14-day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical Report prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc. dated January 18, 2002,with regard to site preparation and development activities. 2. Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. FIRE 1. Remove the single family structure that is stored on the lot. 2. Verify the two aboveground tanks have been cleaned and inerted. PLAN REVIEW WATER 1. The proposed project is located in the 196-water pressure zone. The project is located outside the Aquifer Protection Zone. 2. Water System Development Charges are not required. 3. A separate permit for water meters will be required. SANITARY SEWER 1. Sewer System Development Charges are not required. SURFACE WATER 1. Surface Water System Development Charges are not required. 2. During the months of October 1st through April 30th, a special erosion control measure during the rainy season will be required. TRANSPORTATION 1. A traffic control plan will be required to be submitted to the Development Services Division for review and approval prior to construction activity on the site. GENERAL 1. If necessary, a separate utility permit to cut and cap existing utilities to the singe family structure will be required as part of the demolition and removal per the Fire Department. ERCRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmen Dview Committee Staff Report STONEWAY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA LUA-02-011,ECF REPORT OF March 5,2002 Page 3 of 5 2. If any rockeries/retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height are to be constructed as part of this site, a separate building permit will be required. The following notes shall be included on the civil: "A licensed engineer with geotechnical expertise must be retained for proposed rockeries greater than 4 feet in height. The engineer must monitor construction in general accordance with ARC standards and with his/her supplemental recommendations, in a professional manner and of competent and suitable material." Written verification by the engineer must be provided to the City of Renton Public Works Inspector prior to approval of an occupancy permit. PLANNING 1. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 2. Construction activities are limited by RMC4-4-030C and shall be restricted to the hours between 7 a.m. and 8 p.m. M-F. Saturday between the hours of 9 a.m. and 8 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday. 3. A 15-foot sight-obscuring landscaping strip is required along the subject site's north and eastern property boundary abutting Monster Road SW and Beacon Coal Mine Road. The landscaping plan submitted with the land use permit, which demonstrates how the sight-obscuring landscaping strip would be achieved, is acceptable. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth Impacts: The topography of the site slopes to the west-southwest at gradients ranging from level to relatively steep. Based on the geotechnical report, the northwestern portion of the proposed development contains a twenty- foot high southwest facing excavated slope than extends down to an existing detention pond at relatively steep gradients. The western and southern portions of the development are level and covered with gravel. The east side of the site is bounded by a four to twelve-foot high south-southwest facing slope that extends up to Beacon Coal Mine Road. The undeveloped portions of the site are covered with field grass. A Geotechnical Engineering Study was conducted by Earth Consultants, Inc. and a report dated January 18, 2002 was submitted for review. The underlying soil is composed of medium to dense gravel fill in the top 2 to 7 feet with varying amounts of silt, sand and cobbles. The fill soils are similar in appearance to the underlying native soils but are characterized by their loose consistency and disturbed appearance. Glacially consolidated deposits consisting of dense to very dense sand with varying amounts or silt, gravel, cobbles and hard silt are present below the fill throughout the project area. Following the excavation necessary (approximately 8,000 cubic yards) to reach construction sub-grades elevations, the ground surface where structural fill is necessary should be hard and compacted. In the event the soils are found to be soft and/or loose, the areas in question should be over-excavated and replaced with structural fill to a depth that will provide a stable base beneath the general fill. The applicant is anticipating approximately 7,100 cubic yards of structural fill would be required in order to accommodate suitable construction equipment storage areas. Potential impacts that could occur during site preparation and construction would largely be mitigated by City Code requirements for a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) and a Construction Mitigation Plan. Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical Report prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc. dated January 18, 2002 with regard to site preparation and development activities. ERCRPT.doc • City of Renton P/B/PW Department < Environmen' 9view Committee Staff Report STONEWAY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA LUA-02-011,ECF REPORT OF March 5,2002 Page 4 of 5 2. Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division. Nexus: Environmental Ordinance (SEPA), Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance, Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance. 2. Surface Water Impacts: The applicant submitted a Technical Information Report prepared by Barghausen Engineers dated January 24, 2002. The report contained a Level One Downstream Analysis indicating the site drains to an existing 3-cell stormwater detention pond at the site's northern end. The pond then discharges into an existing biofiltration swale that ultimately drains into a 24-inch steel pipe under the adjacent railroad right-of-way. That pipe then drains into the Duwamish River. The existing stormwater detention pond and biofiltration swale were previously designed and constructed as part of the Black River Waste Reduction Center. The Center's facilities lie to the west and south of the subject site. The existing pond was sized for the Center's facilities as well as for a small portion of the proposed equipment storage and parking area. However, as new paved surfaces (the 25-foot wide drive from Monster Road SW) and the crushed gravel parking and storage area are being created, the detention system would need to be enlarged in order to appropriately collect the added stormwater run-off. In order to contain the additional storm water generated by this proposal, the applicant has proposed to enlarge the existing system by approximately 8,089 cubic feet. The project is subject to the design requirements of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation measures are recommended. Nexus: N/A 3. Air Impacts: There are potential short-term impacts from construction-related activities and exhaust from construction equipment. • Construction related dust would be controlled using best management construction practices. Potential air emissions from project operations would include exhaust from the trucks and dust. To mitigate impacts to air quality, the applicant proposes to water exposed soils as necessary to control dust during construction and operation. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation measures are recommended. Nexus: N/A 4. Transportation Impacts: A traffic study was not required for this proposal as no new building construction is planned and because the site is located in an area zoned for heavy industrial uses. Egress and ingress is proposed from Monster Road SW, which abuts the northeastern side of the site. Monster Road SW is designated as a Principal arterial on the City's Arterial Streets Map. The traffic along Monster Road SW is limited to other industrial developments located along the corridor. According to recent trip counts in this area of the City, Monster Road SW is operating at acceptable levels of service and could accommodate additional traffic generated by this proposal. In addition, this project is exempt from any traffic mitigation fees as no new building construction is planned with this proposal. ERCRPT.doc • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmen eview Committee Staff Report STONEWAY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA L UA-02-011, ECF REPORT OF March 5,2002 Page 5 of 5 Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation measures are recommended. Nexus: N/A 5. Noise Impacts: The proposed site is located in a Heavy Industrial zone adjacent to resource mining and concrete recycling activities. The closest residentially zoned areas are over 1,000 feet to the north and west. Noise would be expected from mechanical equipment associated with the parking and storage area. The noise associated with truck traffic is not unusual for a heavy industrial area and is not anticipated to be significant. Nevertheless, muffling equipment as required per adopted construction standards would mitigate construction equipment noise and the site would be subject to all Washington State and City of Renton noise standards. It should be noted that a Heron rookery is located approximately 3,000 feet away from the subject site. However, as the project is located in a predominate industrial zone, incremental ambient background noise associated with the construction equipment parking and storage area is not anticipated to affect the Heron colony. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation measures are recommended. Nexus: N/A E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM March 25, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. ERCRPT.doc NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP 1 V°n g oeN �_ ((�� WK F RENTON council. - i 5-` x�' F 1�. CA °�° q ... ,al c B r. L.PATRIOT. 911' f 1 2 3 4 5 V. 7 B v '* n3- p vc• .. 1'-250' O cOa. N • a Mq �2] `9 8 S.pV-. \\\ a zs z90 so° °p 'vF _ E® ".�e ] W Z[ 3--�2 O EL Oop FN g u P" ' Or /35TH .� z 03 Q ,(ny U °moo_I r r Vo WqY !F . �;�`"' _ I2 { _ /` ° sPiOFR STAGING9.12 SALES TFCxxI[al RF9ExgCN F °.9 - \W)` ¢ p 1°9F as y. • ,. B: , s ,a_ a 3 a s s T aI.Q r a s x 3$ 2 ❑ o E... aw !''77 8 2 oa1O w CS _ DUWAM�S�I-CO, ,Q s p ° mF.r p�4 RFAE TAT °IT i� .ti, fsygT ,�1 CC y `:..� " I [ileE� IES GORY. {RiN -- � �L. a S� 2 1 O off' ��"�'. 1�'-� 1_ ON ROUTE 900 `.I $ �' MARTIN F 4 CC m CR - p i UL Ac �'Z ' S .0 c U ar I X �� Q o= �„ ao EREALEESTATTE IS i�� �L>; IGestLot7 O W NENE 9Ax6,/. L o •= sr���M c ° .r-;"'�"E r1S �' 12 Acres z t^ @ I'V w'G%%� j�� k it GOLF 13 �� E� r x.N- <f ��ry =_ — '� b' JOSERN SEGA E EE _..., ' °Oro ao I WOK. • a MMI Oo, V o°� 8 7 • 6 5 I 4 3 I 2 1 \r• x E. i or ,nnueTJ°-_ i NTON E. �a _ COURT 34 ` boo �� S�TF iN a o 3B . 37 36 35 % �/4/ i, -- r -nrt /04, 0 '0, @. I � R ; Uqq OopG wm 9 .x'k y ;2;,—— 5 = a eI .n +�\39 40 - 41 . 42 43 44 '• U� =� �-.p, • 10 �•�' i.. "� IT a- Z $ x s ii ? \ = II i �. 16 _ _. n. O $i� n • \ / .I I I Y co 8 TRE i ill �oG\c,``C•?E ...� _ ,.� Oc 'q �,(/ m <5 14 ,/�i _ $ adz c.F ��� yTjj O� �'` 0 ,.° ' ' i % g. ? 777Tryryry''TTT 2e / 13 L' ,E°' 19 'IIll S 6 :. �.'.. K Ig1JA e J e'), ..... O I o7+„ II i e.°ed ~ o 4( - 1 x b, oOeO Z 2S6 . ore i bpx--__,, .€ I .d s e r ae*.t5i54‘Nkfitirli •Ohl y \ `i.,0\ z y, l �c'40 dam. vq �`�I .bS a aC o.. 'i3 .IR}r'k- -Y pw �� b L� rb ' \ .���1��€tee/�,��� ^je`R k/ '�a\� ����:'�;"'a`: Z �U 1 •ll .1 �O\ \\L�- 5 ' 'L� '.a - ,'6�mmax xnslx rurca ' 'N i Sib-,/'y� ®� Ilia l •a 0 -z 4010clki �1 kiara - WAS�H'i NG T0N .TECHNICAL. WON.5.”, P- ' p.�t a-� >..Q{ i .fa �1\� :,w-i ax , ..,, PARCEL 8 �i s' I� a ��I z, :O , —_11 .—G TM-gr+r�� a•: ,, �� ji I✓f ;: ' • ir. II o¢ \ ,:,✓ '•'� .90 .. \ CENTER Np� sees Jy�, °v i v �.• ��'. ,tJ!\�" \ �/ • II ..it: • man i M l Q v - • ,.s.. •-r---='—'`"-. „L. \ A Q ���� L,' \ 09A ' \V'e WAS HINS ..Es ,, p� cOH \\ GFVY Lot I 1�MMI. Al s• a C3P \ WIN�I Govt Intl"�m\'•;•.' __ 13.70Acres FxviR 96_, °, I (L 5 \ � �� .......... 24TAves - \• CITY OF RENTON y,, U�`SD1 a) �\•„',•C\ \, ``fir uxn� DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORK= ° Ste % ;i 1 `, NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP z xa FEN.. ,vrx ogre •Erivm —.tee ti.e., Vam aY m • • I a SCHEMATIC PARKING AREA LAYOUT 2 3 z d m O a a Z a NA P G1.Ex. ,. M. �xEa i 3 CC 6 Z 14' Ec�+wPP µ°o'u`wus CONSTRUCT.W.W RAMP O ,° \� s z O U i MONSTER ROAD SW �y m µe ~z CQ ■ 'sr rt7s.� . u., Z 2 W W ill ,E e u s-siaa wi u,'o civaic uuwro ? .-°s- � .--.=N_ w'.Ee O fA w/,R.,3P.xMER z d aRER xxwz �•' ��`CC �''"� :��. O EY en COAL MINE ROAD �, k e ' '�� .%' �� -_ -'` � _._,u+` :� ; .:��%+� , .. I BEACON i0 EF 6 E XE - - `fir L,`� '1„.;:,:::: F :... I ml �2.DnJ 5 2. N+§z5➢--y y ��.�♦���.40.4.41IV'\ $`VAS' roves E� L2... .. r/,• "/.'1514f�-_4"41. ►•�► 4�®'4)? . � � .,�,,.�, E. +z � %' • *44iii AY Ku �; xTr3.. 7 �0 " %a� i ��r 1 z 3158 ! .�.cO, -- —- `-'_- _ - _s==sl' c,o--- - --9 _,,,,A ACCESS canva V . o % 1. '�l v .�, ,W d,E . j.- -may I,.,S i N .....�...,, IA .... .,1o.+.,t.� .•��n Y:R.�Y ..��i,:S 1/n L s.PAD.:.MA i IN 0. c;s -sw w `` _,�'.1+ t+---�`'•=_"',�zE'-• _-:qsa_=„'r._ --- -mu -- - ��„✓sue,._ — . �. �c.� - - ass, _ki,,_-_: -- -:u--' --•----=— de s • ( �$ g yg O '}" ----'. •i .a-477 _ ,s,as c i..,. uz, d 3 6 I E E _.GP J'• f°&5>�,-,A.��y � -�6 �N1R--'-_4~� CV.BASIN i �\\Y iEr x-n_. ' Qh GON 4 0�6 . ,:' --�..q;50. ). - uTM'"sos IM,. `' ^3 r'^ - - o •IN.• ..�' n ���� `fmxr a`a`ncs 8� 5 li CONTROL SMUMP� ,'!:, t /al IE=,tin • N 26'°3 56 W N z a I g e, ^ 8 9:0° t n\' �,•,P-Rg 45.52 m g .ETA,. _ ` //�tr��Ii$ \ Q f.R s .190Z--j 7;P a p=W60.fW' �f+' �vb'II,'\ S Tp4,,x L. J1655' f 219>PE V vv • si EEN�x co.' �v ,0 8 e 562.24 N 24'22.N W ¢.,le, 1 EXPIRES s-,a-O I !� CITY OF RENTONvS DEPARTMENT OF PURI,.WORKS 02 SCHEMATIC PARKING z AREA LAYOUT m o • COAW PECKED 'G . P OY ui • »o O. a,ffi co • • • 1 . a I GRADING, DRAINAGE AND TEMPORARY EROSION SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN z d ga co O a C , • ..,� O z s z z //�� wC.xcac 0rA[oxm�'ADM RASIP �ll 3 CONC.CURB MO coxsmocr xEw Rwv Q m g_ naz—.Ar `'i g co Q W Q o ao eo - MONSTER ROAD SW /. ,� Q F-ham'"'1,...-.,,., wzo3' s iass'u e .2Z Ar a . Z i ¢ O � ,[b'a5-S,oB 4© Off uo.i. ctrz. �� -y.. r —ro_~ O GOWER DOLE iliffr /•�, _ = [�I ¢ w/rPo POLE xT E -y' 'c�- ZZ s PwEi f^ ?�.x. . !,. J Ii �Y Sv.eb 5,.x � x[i i- Y�4�\_cam � /�:�'' g COAL MINE ROAD 1 • E 6:GI5. .x' aaN a a p.,✓ '';% ;�'r^2Y-, r y4 u 0 BEACON E.: - ..."a =-- -;75`/z; 0 W ' G.DIGOD .r RIP d'S[OPE V .-A j ' ^�i ///cYw �� 5�•'Ip../. �, roc cm x 210.OT 5 2i 16 89•E . .6":" %l s^' � �ia\ z ^aa .4.. �1.. f-ram_- _ -' ` %/ 1, •�I _ 00 e.^s.,-r- ----- -= Aare of t ----9 --^` - �---- 1__T 1_7 T -- <___ �` *---4'.3�`\,\�o N[o� 9 / cat6. ¢ s E. a +•: N 0010 MID a N1nl Y .. __ 4 s mNsmurnoxy or IE..W ae ! _ -�_ - l s 6n ax su slaw.azu�o • —�.._� \,`: W UF1 •i' ;;;�; - _ / • ,cRAaxc OP noc I `% ia\ 4 \\,'� O A'i ; - ----- / 7;Th \ -..4 u.i�f , , is_ ` \ �` / O rC li i, _e I / ''m '''''; I_ I a - nax ma 0 II ' NEW rz .•>., • r. s i.! --s•-----'t- ..eN c wm Ic.a F - w u a0� ' 12 , Lv. .� -t r. �[.,-a U.a. �� i .1*r _ .. ... .- E MG n.z:r jai 3f r /r ':f\\ 2 41!I ue. t:,�•`�1` __._��-_'`/�-��no`r;_a • e.o ' _... - x. Is in y.r. -a^� -- 1---- �5 _ ysrrs� w;yl r f-,.i- -"'_.=r_ -.an-o r I - SJ _-_ JL+��L ifw mom,IA.or i �N��i i,r.,tt xu^' "'�y�iN a1,A '^'-'- urcN OAsuz - r 1 _ __ ---------------_ Of -� G v .f,1;,71 �CG' --- - :.[..., :P- r.FR cur _"___� =-'A=A-ox_SMfl a)___�_`� a' 0 • , Hill POPS �. ...— It�AI� is.,",,, Ea2_� -• .'•'.' •,r.c-2614 l<�1 �, 5. w 1 8 S xf" " Y( g �0,..e '7-,,5 ,r--gl I O\I, _ ' �, �,,,. x. e,.x 5a5 a E El m g_ m" E -E��` �j C ?::r i '.::.f 4i I Cis a� ,.ws n- 11 g_ u c S ..a02 yyfiv.^� �- t` I 3HN - A /9 s� V• 1((.('')/4• ns,a • [cmar aais 9 rn N W T� 3 a �yy a� I 1 '3a41 24 56 N Sc�� �v'� o la`` ��� it o; qEy�Jn9 Z 0 s. MM.-001 CD.. +59�/ t LOLTIE!oxc • 4•CRYWre P.0 6GN a RA• r. I l /yN l R — ///r��e .1 nXxnnso{u3p eB J5 6'0 x[,1us5 a�� e`: a l I V. SITE DATA. / f�. _ ,"�, o y A.a•d 22' 04 Am -xo R�a0.50.00' AREA Or MRS Or CONSTRUCTION.1.0 ACRES 1,� I L.338.55' TOTAL AREA N BE DISTURBED 3.5 ACRES c Vl � w -1p tRAd Rol AFL ONM1VIII OG DMVAnONo C8,0[3 CY �� ...,Ci a` Vb' 96O.2a N 2a'22 3a. rt.1,u 8 e c I EXPIRES 6-10-01 1 h CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS GRADING DRAINAGE AND TEMPORARY d EROSION SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN z o 041E 1/24/02 ,.E,a DRUM IADY 1 w1E ranmaA _Are U e , _ re e,.,;m, INArN3 DATE D.... ,,,,,,,s,.,.,.. I�,C2 �wA3 m s ' .. • • 1 • • , s : PLANTING PLAN -,. NI i ----- . _ 2 _, •.: 0 1311122uly aplenTral Nona Sao Swarang z co 0 o_ • Hogan Cedar a la n.. . < z o — . 8 Acer',lanai....num' I ---...-----.1.F.T.--------..E:E-07PAVING ----.......- Giobe Norway Nopla 6/3 CC < Z '°•,r,wwwwiror#1,Filrifillill.),1,t,-.P6-0.X 1-4'1,17.:4171Nt rl'':'.7.----Z)11*11111-:':::-----'.. • 53 Res cc,F,84118 0 8 < Air vil-feltirdift„, Z!:__.,-i-‘-fraiCaTal" iriga0J---_----_- - Illina Fdword VW -.1 ,,,,(4,..8.2 %.r.4.1W1l....2i.A0,,Se)- We ......_..:o..... Litg.."19r,-,_ ___ ---"—:::----,,.,"," Nino Edward Red Z 0 a_ .----P(OH) .....41, aak 1111_ ,.-...10t.V110' ---------- Powering Current 0 gW.... -,...0.)... ,._.---- --------.--"...- --"---.-".--"-"_____.----------- ,____-------------:_____..----..-., , ,-- / gra...aver adiacent la all aloot matanal 2 0 / AppuslaohyPao tote-uywo NoNCow - ''''.7 ECtEl---------- ------ I'11. / Vancouver.1.1.s. °NOM Ell NC MP < ..- Vonvouver Jade ICEmickinnick ...''''' MD CONSTRUCT NEW RUAR 8 i.---,-.----..-- _----- ., BEON COW TY //- Note:All planting areas lo ba wall:rad with.pation syster:>....„/ cm,&,,,,,88, l'r.:XT"PICAL SHRUB PLANTING , ' r3115,,,.. MONSTER ROAD SW NEW GATE SCALE:1,2CE , --IbS I.11 t "Po.:OR.w:W TO,FE.7P....-1-P:A.O.-o 7L5I:IE A1.9..-S:-27g-0,.0..:.e..-.t: —e0,71...g..i.-.1_L.-!.-E-,.1.z:?:-;:"k0":,.5:..'1-1r,.2_:;•E c:,,.,.:,,„.,"_i.-0:,...,,._;;-.-..l-........-..i.l.;-.i.::p3:;..1:•i;.:5_:,'_.._.;_5 T:T-CI,...iff._‘,-_j1'r.-c:..r°P1.':o:7:77-,i':',_._7_..1.-„..P1...-56:..-6.v.o--°.,-"n-;•*--'l_b-''C.:_.j_l'l-__-fr 2-„-9-0?--1:---:i,1fT:I.0:1_'";',s-.:-•„.--::Z::4::71:.:.:.1f-21:.1:1",::.1.":°2__.--E:-_--.--_t)_-„7-.?-\-^.47 k,o\,';l,'..,:;,,,;;vI,1.:q...i,i..6-.?.4,.,..7.,.,„X,._ tI „ . .. .. 011 ,' , ::t:!-f . 1 . :9 _i1 : _ l E1-jy4IN- ONG ro_1m <I010C onT§ L' /4 44,...(r.,0,2,-,;,,,,-___,-.-.„--:.,-...--7- ,• • ---------;'; •,,g? f.) 7„----1 / ---C,,,,,,,,7(swl:;19 ,• U i -----(xc oroa.,fis\ury) earro.v. ' / _-------\\' / 7: `1!! , fi iiillV. ........"---'-'_=_-72-_:;-.1.-_,--- :.=,--7-_-_:5"-_ _-_-,--„--_,==-----..,_-r,-__,="7--=---------7.-i -,t'_r T:... ....••,,,2, -----. ,,,m ...,. 2,R.....:, :, 6 6“666 si,. Lia — __-----•,„;,....---T, ,- ....,,,, onnt...„.non. /40.7 , , wil,f),"? --.11-411T OF S '1- ors,'War ,ti,j51 E• ' r......11.--..E. — ,P .' L^ND-?°'"' \ in 1 1 : ' SILT FE , --- ,tf.f.-r,--------------t _.,., ".,„. I '- '?-'--• ,,,,,,;•/.10, ;... ,.,s -----.L.--------""-------r woc cow '41 t WITH EROSION CONTROL NIX 8.1 • f'Rt 'l ELMO.BLOCX5 35.R/13, L'il la ,,,,,,.,...„.......,, I ri.- ,-,.. tc...1 32-•\. sT. 20 :10 ao ---,_ . 6-8-----w-,----- --- ---------- -------------------------- .- •• CS - i — ''''"r'''' • f t Ay..,-:::: :„.a-,-:,,.....-:.:1.-1.-!..1...:_- ..- 2,., I i..,...,.:..,9, ,,,,..22:3,.,--.---NH-,-------:--::::------ :__....... '1 a.). s ,...„, -----------------------„,-----,,,,,.,.::14" ; , 1 c•••'- 1,/, ,/ -2,..,.A........,._.—- .---------.7-- , .9, , r.,-WS 11•21. ,I.4.a..21:7 LIMOB OF •, - , s_.,‘ Gar. k 41.17- -i--' f--- ---1 ,. N, rib. Ili\ ,„,.•3:1 . , 1 , I ! • \ .) ‘ '. 1 ,..T.,?...; .‘,;.'„_,,,,, \ 24,05 S 19,6 i 1 i i . ,d;!:,..''. ,...._......•;;, \ ,,,,!..L....,,, ti' ,, ,,,,. .,1, 1r a,1,•19 le MOIIIICI . .6.;:',..' \ ----., •. *,',.4 CONIM , 3 005,- Oa SII,AM0q • N .' ;i 1,\cr i......-.1‘,', ''''' PIA•.,..5 s ' . !! \ ,..1.,,-_-.,-) , .——• • CITY OF RENTON . .• 1 -' --•„, •.___1:r--,,,,i t M▪ .,al0.5 IDEFFJOTI.E14-8 OP PUBLIC WORK° 11 _-----T. .-. ...—..-_.-------------- ""."'''-'"I-- '--tik.•,,.,-01 ---='----- cr.,.•,.... —'----\ A-C.47.22' PLANTING PLAN 1 I I ..—••—• --- • ..111.0 M. Ii=4050.00' I-338.55' IMAM NY- ,,,,,e oV02/oc 8..1.1.a.._.• swr. ' i ia Few. at taiD Hs_ 0.11 M. sy inn IIKI£ ....... ,,....,..,.... P13.08005____PNE__ , - • 43sss - - • • . . • \.0\ t (Th ‘''\\ �_S. 127tt. . 1. :7/ . 4S)Ne:N''''''\tj5 t \ c * - > 01 S129thSt �- \ cc) 6 \.(90,:p • ��� — c. 130th 2 S. ,. co ,::"...N.. a) L.S.___E . N \ 't,<,* ..:,4 > �' :32nd _St i J • . _._,....„....„,z.:,.......,,....„. ____ _S 133r // �� far tl i� ,V vV ) ' -...., �� \\ Q z Pi tli CO i 5.149 j IH s l IN 2nd 6------' .4Ik ci) \\\`.k.s..---7,;\ „ Af —�`---_S 143rd St = NI\ S 14 - ==� I M.� ,-th, . S: co �3 d pi �. r� I S 144th St �' 1 i �Y 4 �o0 40o F1 o �, , ZONING 1.4800 '�F®c- TECHNICAL SERVICES 14 T23N R4E E 1/2 ZNINGMAPBOC : . 92 j�f!LiA:'P 9 ' 455' �`f r - 4N R4E 25 T2 _,..1 r• ;:kg /I� 5E �4N f ♦'4 ' `eons v�41R .,� a n r �� 1 'T241 R T24N'R5E f. �1 / w 26 , i ; 11 ; 7� , ,464 J� ' 7 /1 - i11- J it I �� ��il b+ ( _ 3 �- _ __ _,. ,,� is r\�� 36 T24N R4E 31 T24#R5E { 11. , '2' �''7 �� 4 j r�` „ ' 35 T24N R5E 3 6 _)�i 307 . 1�'.. .,tg ' ` 1e• w� , +>'_ ' ;:°�-� pie@®; •°1 ,,, ;, i.,„., ,, , ,,,, ,_..4„ , ,,. ._.._,..4 -,jii di t t \ 3 ,,,.,, 2723N R4E '1 , ,.• , , A43-1..-- �,3"13N1R5E N ,,,'1/4.',,,,i1.6. . . . 0, , ..°A' k 4? 4 k 3. t3(- :. � 3', --� , T23N R5E 31�s.. + r , ��II• I j • q e� a 1�� ` e • i �;l o'1 i I' F ry n r 0 It, :...L 4Ea,11.. aF`tt y',c 1 � if 114. :.._ 8a� 1 �E z'11 � n ,, I � '` Ilo 'I!� 3 / t '1 /,', - =.�4" -.e_ r�-L}. I,f+a.� _ I �Inwu/ , _, f4.• O I_ .J F.- • f.z., 8.LA. I�i R jam' i•► 4 gip' fR:' 1f n l 4 T23N R4 �y T23N �1; ���. T. 1�))I, " 18 ^ lY t;i R5E 18 T23r1�z 1.T23N;R5E 1A T231�RSE ., 371 33� — 35 �� ,I ;, �� ,3 Thi;_, 815�, = g1 1� ;j2p 1 _ \_.\ , y ,rs. �,,, -,,- , / /4 _ C— i . G , .3 T23N R4E T231�R4E { r,., ^20 T23N • 21-T23N _ 22 T23N R5E 23 T23N R5E 21 II �•, a� 344 1 COOS,\ ,`, ''' 1' ,:'— ' 602 I 01'` 821 j Hi _.. H2,, - ,, ,__. . ,,, 16, ?61T23N R4E 7 23d1 R4E I,- - --,, - , . • ,,,, ,, g-.7. = s, H61 — ,.� ,,,iaiT231d 1-_. 2 `R5E , 28 Z N R5E _- 27 T'13NR5E 26 T23N R5E. �� 51 ii :�u � _.� I 25 40 -�� _'', li �� �.ii ,� � .1 ' _���� 825�'i 826��� 8 r i J ��''�I •^`i) . if H �r �� ear^ �,� 1 'ate 5_iiaf1iY . Ii 38 .,'3N R <1 T2 R5E 3 ` -5E al, 3N R f1 r., 5E ., y 35 T23N ». :: 36 1 §1 •N ' _. `� Elf _ it �f;� � _ 833 8 , , � 60 60 � 1 , -3 B � '3 G r r i ( 1 (C1-,', K ,, j- _J 1,...:,, eii...„ J7- ------- 1. ' 22N R4E — 6 T22N R5E 1 t5' 22N R5E ` 4,i � `�'� 122N°�2 E `4 1> hY � 1 —,r v v iy9�. , 4' 1` n �,•�• • 3 ... 2T22NR5E KROLL I-RC Resource Conservation CC Convenience Commercial (PC Publicly Owned PAGE# I R-1 Residential 1 du/ac CN Center Neighborhood• Renton City Limits R-5 Residential 5 du/ac Cs Center Suburban* """' Adjacent City Limits CD Center Downtown• I .'II (Grey Text) Prezones SECT/TOWNrRANGE I R-8 Residential 8 du/ac COP Center Office Residential I•:•:•,I Automall District A I RNH Residential Manufactured Homes I R-10 Residential 10 du/ac CA Commercial Arterial Automall District S IR Residential 14 du/ac CO Commercial Office • For additional regulations in overlay districts not shown on this map, please see RMC 4-3. RM-1 Residential Multi-Family InfiH IH Industrial - Heavy I RH-N Residential Multi-Family Neighborhood Center IN Industrial - Medium PAGE IRM-C Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center IL Industrial - Light INDEX L_3 IRM-U Residential Multi-Family Urban Center• P-1 Public Use w February 26, 2002 LUA-02-013,ECF / Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area Suzanne Krom, President DEVELOPMENT PLANNy' CITY OF C-IENTON Herons Forever 4715 1/2- 36th Avenue SW MAR 0 1 2002 Seattle, WA 98126-2715 RECEWE February 26, 2002 Jason Jordan, Project Planner Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Subject: LUA-02-013,ECF/Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area Dear Jason, Thank you for the opportunity to comment and for agreeing to accept our comments by February 28. The other signers of this letter and I were not Parties of Record for this proposed action. In the future, please always include us as Parties of Record for any proposed action in or near the Black River site. I am president of Herons Forever, a350-member organization involved with the preservation of the Black River Riparian Forest since 1989. The Seattle arid Rainier Audubon Societies should also have been Parties of Record for this proposed project. Seattle Audubon Society represents over 5,300 members, including Renton residents, and Rainier Audubon Society represents over 1,400 South King County residents. We have consistently been involved in the public process and have requested in the past to be Parties of Record for this geographical area. Please add us to your permanent Party of Record list for any future proposed action in or near the Black River site. Our comments regarding the proposed project are as follows: • The City of Renton should require compliance with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual instead of the 1990 version. The proposed and adjacent areas sustain significant seasonal flooding and consist of significant wetlands. • Contaminants from vehicles and all associated activities related to the proposed use should not further contribute to the contamination of the watershed. • We request the opportunity to comment on all aspects,of the proposed project, including, the SEPA checklist when it is completed. The proposed project area is rich in wildlife and 1 M ' February 26, 2002 LUA-02-013,ECF / Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area consists of very good habitat. We do not want the habitat to be degraded in any significant way. Please send us any notification, determinations, and other pertinent correspondence for this and all other projects in the Black River area. Our organizations feel strongly about the protection of this area and have been advocating for its protection for many years. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed project. L-► � � Lauren Braden, Advocate for Wildlife Habitat Seattle Audubon Society St— Bruce Harpham, Conservation Chair Rainier Audubon Society Suzanne Krom, President Herons Forever 2 CITY .OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: February 28, 2002 TO: Jason Jordan FROM: Sonja J. Fesser� SUBJECT: Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced ECF submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant: The current City of Renton City Limits Line, as established per City of Renton Ordinance No. 4578 (King County Recording No. 199602141057), does not agree with what is noted on Sheet 1 and 2 of 3. Revise as needed. The legal description,for the property that encompasses the subject parking/storage site, excepts a portion of said property within Lot 33 of the plat of Junction Addition for the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way. The King County Assessor's map designates a triangular parcel within Lot 33, lying south of a street vacated in 1932, as railroad right-of-way, as well as that portion of Lot 33 lying northerly of said vacated street(a.k.a. City of Tukwila City Limits line). Does the Quit Claim Deed from Union Pacific Railroad Company to Anmarco, as recorded under King County Recording No. 8911280666, establish vesting rights with Anmarco? Please review. \H:\FILE.SYS\LND\20\STONEWAY.doc City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Y0 l�ldjArv105 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 26�„2t0OON70N APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-011;3,ECF "l DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 12, i E E APPLICANT: Gary Merlino/Stoneway Concrete PROJECT MANAGER: Jason E.JordanFEB 1 2 2 002 PROJECT TITLE: Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area WORK ORDER NO: 78945 eU 1�FNG vlsioN LOCATION: 501 Monster Road SW SITE AREA: 15.8 acres - BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant,Stoneway Concrete, has requested to grade approximately 8,000 cubic yards of material on an existing 15.8-acre site, located in southwest Renton. The grading would allow for a more suitable site for construction equipment storage,while also enhancing internal access within the site. The project will require environmental(SEPA)review. Access to the site is proposed in two locations form Monster Road SW. The applicant will also improve the existing on-site storm drainage system as required by code. No other building construction is planned at this time. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet RECEIVED FEB 13 2002 CITY OF RENTON UTILITY SYSTEMS B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City0 , of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public V1Torks P ENVIRONMENTALn & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:/ Oft i( den yvi(,S COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-013,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 12, 2002 APPLICANT: Gary Merlino/Stoneway Concrete PROJECT MANAGER: Jason E.Jordan � OFRENTON PROJECT TITLE: Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area WORK ORDER NO: 78945 RE C�Y E 9y E D LOCATION: 501 Monster Road SW FEB SITE AREA: 15.8 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A u) t Z 1�01 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant,Stoneway Concrete, has requested to grade approximately 8,,OU �P QMI p4iaterial on an existing 15.8-acre site, located in southwest Renton. The grading would allow for a more suitable site for construction equipment storage,while also enhancing internal access within the site. The project will require environmental (SEPA)review. Access to the site is proposed in two locations form Monster Road SW. The applicant will also improve the existing on-site storm drainage system as required by code. No other building construction is planned at this time. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare . Plants Recreation • Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services • Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 80 1 L DI J6 p (2 11- ,p L V l 62 L:_--VD f�0 12. J1 O DU L,4-c B L a{- w4L C- f4o,U1Tcit21 XJ( (ay eO Cfr( K.�ivi t Q J We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this propos 2-6 01 Signature of Director or Authorized RC..-- nt i e Date Routing Rev.10/93 r ' CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: February 25, 2002 TO: Jason Jordan FROM: Jan Illian X7216 SUBJECT: STONEWAY TRUCKING PARKING LOT LUA 02-013 501 — Monster Road SW I have reviewed the application for Stoneway Trucking Parking Lot at 501 Monster Road and have the following comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER 1. The proposed project is located in the 196-water pressure zone. The project is located outside the Aquifer Protection Zone, 2. Water System Development Charges are not required. SANITARY SEWER 1. Sewer System Development Charges are not required. SURFACE WATER 1. A drainage report and drainage plan as outlined in the 1990 King County Surface Water Manual been submitted and is currently under review. 2. Surface Water System Development Charges are not required. TRANSPORTATION 1. A traffic control plan will be required to be submitted for review and approved prior to construction activity on the site. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. During the months of October 1st though April 30th, special erosion control measures during the rainy season will be required. A copy is attached. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2Separate permits for water meters will be required. 3.�construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 4,1 A separate utility permit to cut and cap exiting utilities to the single family structure will be required as part of the demolition/removal per the fire department's request. 5. If any rockeries/retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height are to be constructed as part of this site, a separate building permit will be required. The following note shall be included on the civil: "A licensed engineer with geo technical expertise must be retained for proposed rockeries greater than four feet in height. The engineer must monitor rockery construction and verify in writing that the rockery was constructed in general accordance with ARC standards and with his/her supplemental recommendations, in a professional manner and of competent and suitable material. Written verification by the engineer must be provided to the City of Renton public works inspector prior to approval of an occupancy permit or plat approval for the project..A separate building permit will be required." cc:Kayren Kittrick City of Rellrton Department of Planning/Building/Public rks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: < heie /0G4 r COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-013,ECF /// DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 12,2002 CITY OFRENTON RECEIVED APPLICANT: Gary Merlino/Stoneway Concrete PROJECT MANAGER: Jason E.Jordan PROJECT TITLE: Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area WORK ORDER NO: 78945 FEB :i 2. 2002 LOCATION: 501 Monster Road SW BUILDING DIVISION SITE AREA: 15.8 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant,Stoneway Concrete, has requested to grade approximately 8,000 cubic yards of material on an existing 15.8-acre site, located in southwest Renton. The grading would allow for a more suitable site for construction equipment storage,while also enhancing internal access within the site. The project will require environmental (SEPA)review. Access to the site is proposed in two locations form Monster Road SW. The applicant will also improve the existing on-site storm drainage system as required by code. No other building construction is planned at this time. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary • Earth Housing • Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare _ Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities • Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS , - e7/ a()/)21 ( 7-6 . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 4"7047Z51- a? Signature of Directo Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 0 of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works City p ENVIRONMENTAL' & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Traii5 pov. doll COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-013,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 12,2002 APPLICANT: Gary Merlino/Stoneway Concrete PROJECT MANAGER: Jason E.Jordan PROJECT TITLE: Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area WORK ORDER NO: 78945 'cleC r j V E 0 LOCATION: 501 Monster Road SW c SITE AREA: 15.8 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A `EB ���� SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant,Stoneway Concrete, has requested to grade approximately 8,0 gt�i t icAOaterial on an existing 15.8-acre site,located in southwest Renton. The grading would allow for a more suitable sit014Petinstruction equipment storage,while also enhancing internal access within the site. The project will require environmental(SEPA)review. Access to the site is proposed in two locations form Monster Road SW. The applicant will also improve the existing on-site storm drainage system as required by code. No other building construction is planned at this time. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. C Vc;2S Signature of Director horized Representafive Date Routing Rev.10/93 I City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ptaA U(?QJ COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-013,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 12,2002 APPLICANT: Gary Merlino/Stoneway Concrete PROJECT MANAGER: Jason E.Jordan PROJECT TITLE: Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area WORK ORDER NO: 78945 LOCATION: 501 Monster Road SW CITY OF RENTON SITE AREA: 15.8 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A CCR E E I V E D SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant, Stoneway Concrete, has requested to grade approximately 8,0UtEabi ga material uclio on an existing 15.8-acre site,located in southwest Renton. The grading would allow for a more suitable site for constrf1 equipment storage,while also enhancing internal access within the site. The project will require environgqq P review. Access to the site is proposed in two locations form Monster Road SW. The applicant will also improve Si gi brm drainage system as required by code. No other building construction is planned at this time. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or u orized Representative Date WO2- Routing Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: par k5 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-013,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 12,200 APPLICANT: Gary Merlino/Stoneway Concrete PROJECT MANAGER: Jason E.Jordan �^' PROJECT TITLE: Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area WORK ORDER NO: 78945 tcsi LOCATION: 501 Monster Road SW 2002 SITE AREA: 15.8 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A Y�`" `-n IVi l J� �r��tl SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant,Stoneway Concrete,has requested to grade approximately 8,000 cubic yards o cria on an existing 15.8-acre site, located in southwest Renton. The grading would allow for a more suitable site for construction equipment storage,while also enhancing internal access within the site. The project will require environmental (SEPA)review. Access to the site is proposed in two locations form Monster Road SW. The applicant will also improve the existing on-site storm drainage system as required by code. No other building construction is planned at this time. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet NJ/1M allir B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS diVALCUlk n A/1,44119 61'(45 Pa4i C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 41.e)Le2 alte, a(,i4, it, igz)41, We have reviewed this application ith particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wh additional informati " needed to prop ly assess this proposal. I doll 60,Z Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: February 21,2002 TO: Jason Jordan FROM: Ion Erickson SUBJECT: LUA-02-013,ECF; Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area, 501 Monster Road(PID 377920-0160) The applicants are proposing to use 4 acres of a 15 acre site for the parking and storage of gravel and occasionally redi-mix concrete trucks. The site is located on the west side of Monster Road on the west side of Beacon Coal Mine Road. The site is designated on the City Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map as Employment Area—Valley and is zoned Industrial—Heavy OH). Some of the more relevant Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element policies include the following: Policy LU-144. The City should endeavor to keep its present economic base, including the heavy industrial development, light and medium industrial users, supporting commercial and office land uses. Policy LU-212.2. Compatible and related land uses should be encouraged to locate in proximity to one another. Policy LU-212.3. Development standards should promote an increased intensity and quality of development. There does not appear to be any obvious conflict between the subject proposal and relevant policies for heavy industrial uses within the Employment Area—Valley land use designation. cc: Rebecca Lind H:\EDNSP\Interdepartmental\Development Review\Green Fi1e\Comments\Stoneway Truck Parking Area.doc\d City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 6 vt`bV& C_)eVe, 6 )M fiOMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-013,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 12,2002 APPLICANT: Gary Merlino/Stoneway Concrete PROJECT MANAGER: Jason E.Jordan PROJECT TITLE: Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area WORK ORDER NO: 78945 LOCATION: 501 Monster Road SW SITE AREA: 15.8 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant,Stoneway Concrete,has requested to grade approximately 8,000 cubic yards of material on an existing 15.8-acre site,located in southwest Renton. The grading would allow for a more suitable site for construction equipment storage,while also enhancing internal access within the site. The project will require environmental(SEPA)review. Access to the site is proposed in two locations form Monster Road SW. The applicant will also improve the existing on-site storm drainage system as required by code. No other building construction is planned at this time. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 'QUM/4'6 2/2S-70„ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 fcY 0 0 0set ® , CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: February 21, 2002 TO: Jason Jordan, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Stoneway Truck Parking 86 Storage, 501 Monster Rd. SW MITIGATION ITEMS; 1. A fire mitigation fee is not required for this project. FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. Remove the single family structure that is stored on the lot. 2. Verify the two aboveground tanks have been cleaned and inerted. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. 41. � �. Y ® , CITY OF RENTON �,�N�o FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: February 21, 2002 TO: Jason Jordan, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Stoneway Truck Parking 86 Storage, 501 Monster Rd. SW MITIGATION ITEMS; 1. A fire mitigation fee is not required for this project. FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. Remove the single family structure that is stored on the lot. 2. Verify the two aboveground tanks have been cleaned and inerted. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public orks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: gi COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-013,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUAR�2, 9119 APPLICANT: Gary Merlino/Stoneway Concrete PROJECT MANAGE . Jason E.Jordan PROJECT TITLE: Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area WORK ORDER NO: 78945 1(� LOCATION: 501 Monster Road SW FiFre'PZPV,fa'm SITE AREA: 15.8 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/AFEB 2nn� SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant, Stoneway Concrete, has requested to grade approximately 8,000 cubic yyaras�f ma ial on an existing 15.8-acre site,located in southwest Renton. The grading would allow for a more suitable site for construction equipment storage,while also enhancing internal access within the site. The project will require environmept ,(SEPA)review_� Access to the site is proposed in two locations form Monster Road SW. The applicant will also improve the``ee5cisting,,Qrt: it-00 (�ICES drainage system as required by code. No other building construction is planned at this time. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet \R_ B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY y 4F RENTpN FEB 2 6 2•t72 RECEIVED C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. CRa hilCa 2- /2^02- Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10193 MIL VITO NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: February 12,2002 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-02-013,ECF APPLICATION NAME: STONEWAY TRUCK PARKING/STORAGE AREA PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Stoneway Concrete, has requested to grade approximately 8,000 cubic yards of material on an existing 15.8-acre site, located in southwest Renton. The grading would allow for a more suitable site for construction equipment storage, while also enhancing internal access within the site. The project will • require environmental (SEPA) review. Access to the site is proposed in two locations from Monster Road SW. The applicant will also improve the existing on-site storm drainage system as required by code. No other building construction is planned at this time. PROJECT LOCATION: 501 Monster Road SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: January 28,2002 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: February 12,2002 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review Other Permits which may be required: City of Renton Grading Permit Requested Studies: Geotechnical Report,Drainage Analysis,&Wetland Evaluation Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: N/A CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Land Use: The subject site is designated Employment Area-Industrial(EAI)on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Heavy Industrial(IH)on the City's Zoning map. Based on the City's land use definitions,the storage facility would be a primary permitted use in the Heavy Industrial Zone. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: SEPA Checklist Development Regulations • Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code,Public Works Standards,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: 1. Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 2. The applicant will be required to follow the recommendations contained with the Geotechnical Engineering Study prepared for this project with regard to the disturbance,preparation and construction of the site. NOTICE OF APPLICATION . I n° Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jason E. Jordan, Associate Planner, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on February 26,2002. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: JASON E.JORDAN (425)430-7219 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP •� Ui /f ulx. ` :x: < /I 2 3 4 er�! ) , 71 a --}{0,-p - p J <Gry Fp II E. - ...2 AUTN. .57 rf] S 0 -(W= _ _- :.i<l .,:.. ,,, n<..' Z.,,, a Al li' s !. �'L ZeF a e� T gQ, rl�° e,� '� a e !f/ • i .4 V. s•ar + • 0 (,1 Ram 900e "I >t ! N4-- G rig R1 ism .xn x: ��L e a :..�..°"'' �E 'C "Z— Yi7Y�.��" I. 12 Acm GOLF l' ' Ox- �o•'d�� E T 5 7,2 5 4 I 3 2 I n • .1115 \,. r 9 J r x C'UR, \ SITE ,AGti�,.,- _ ._ .-\\\,,,,, -:. (Ii /0 7400 -ridl.„,, 9 10 '/ice. 17 I it iiii: /:i15 I _ _ - 1 r o Fq s�, 14 P , , ,., . '.°s �` ,\ '‘''N fig l; " yao a oo p ..q,4,-4s'.t: ' 4:1,1j' ' . I It \ 1 # .."1,10' "4 o ,., , \,,,,,.., 01. 07400101°‘ ,....441.8,.),./0"----1- l'.. ,,,,71 *I,* \'' 1'I ()lip \* ihi . I - ''''k fifift141: t . '. \'DO P� r W AN'I N G T O N TyE C N N I C A L �uuiv,ie C��- zc I° ❑ ------ alli_ �I' May iiiI.AL dialitilld R 177 " '. v ��ii4YI'Q' s o ° ,�I.� `• r"I � ► `p w4ee /71M . X i►lli If� ✓ \, S� ,. CENTER :7_ 110 ��lt7 'ram'-V , 1Lo.�._ .a .°RIN e ���II dIY ��it c°JI lnt2 Qb ---' /' 11701ure oe-.:.,�..m.+ISOP I Oa II E zmAe.ee $ s-.\ Leilir ' - tV isOPo10oD[ p� Iz s*ai / . I(„ If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. File No./Name: LUA-02-013,ECF/Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: NOTICE OF APPLICATION CITY �F RENTON salola �� Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator February 12, 2002 Mr. David Halinen Halinen Law Offices, P.S,. 2115 N. 30th Street, Suite 203 Tacoma, WA 98403 • SUBJECT: Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Project No. LUA-02-013,ECF Dear Mr. Halinen: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on March 5, 2002. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at(425)430-7219, if you have any questions. Sincer • Jason E. dan Associate Planner cc: AnMarCo/Stoneway/Owners a..eplai we 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 17, This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer , HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. A Professional Service Corporation David L Halinen,P.E. McCarver Square Tacoma(253)627-6680 davidhalinen@halinenlaw.com 2115 North 306 Street, Suite 203 Seattle(206)443-4684 Tacoma,Washington 98403 Fax(253)272-9876 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING January 29, 2002 CITY OF RENTON VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL JAN 3 1 2001 City of Renton Development Services Division DECEIVED Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 1055 S. Grady Way, Sixth Floor Renton, Washington 98055 Attn: Jason Jordan,Associate Planner RE: Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area at 501 Monster Road SW,Renton Submittal of Copies of Document that was Omitted from Yesterday's Package of Land Use Permit Master Application and Materials for SEPA Review Dear Mr. Jordan: Enclosed herewith are several copies of the"Agreement Regarding Removal of Regulated Substances From the Stoneway Concrete Batch Plant Site Located at 1915 Maple Valley Highway, Renton" which was cited at the end of Mr. Halinen's January 25, 2002 letter to you regarding Stoneway's Land Use Permit Master Application and associated materials for SEPA Review of the proposed Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area at 501 Monster Road SW,Renton. In assembling the materials for your review, I apparently overlooked these copies. As mentioned previously by Mr. Halinen, should you have any questions or comments concerning the submittal,please contact him immediately. Sincerely, DEVELOPMENT PLANNING HALINEN LAW OFFICES,P.S. CITY OF RENTON • JAN 3 1 2002 RECEIVED Debbie Santelli Legal Assistant Enclosures C:\CF'2009\016\TRUCK PARKINGUORDAN.LTI.DOC F ONN`NG DEVEL OFRENT CAG 00-146 CITY JO 312002 RECEDED AGREEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL OF REGULATED SUBSTANCES FROM THE STONEWAY CONCRETE BATCH PLANT SITE LOCATED AT 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY,RENTON THIS AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is entered into on this / day.of , 2000, by and among the CITY OF RENTON, a Washington municipal corporation (the "City"), ANMARCO, a Washington general partnership ("AnMarCo"), and STONEWAY CONCRETE ("Stoneway", a division of Gary Merlino Construction, Inc., a Washington corporation -"GMCC") (all of whom are collectively referred to herein as the "parties"), with respect to the following facts. Recitals A. The City of Renton adopted an Aquifer Protection Ordinance (Ordinance.No. 4367) on September 14, 1992. That ordinance, which became effective on October 14, 1992, has a stated purpose of protecting the City's underground drinking water supply from contamination. B. The City represents that the Aquifer Protection Ordinance sets forth de minimis quantities of regulated substances that may be used or stored within two "Aquifer Protection Zones"within the City. C. Section 8-8-6A.1 of the City's Aquifer Protection Ordinance (as amended) states: A. Removal of Existing Facilities: 1. Ten (10) years after the effective date of this Chapter, the storage, handling, use, treatment or production of hazardous materials in aggregate quantities greater than five hundred (500) gallons shall not be allowed within Zone 1 of an APA. The storage, handling, use, treatment or production of perchloroethylene shall not be allowed within Zone 1 of an APA after March 31, 1999. In view of the Aquifer Protection Ordinance's October 14, 1992 effective date, the City represents that Section 8-8-6A.1's stated prohibitions will become effective on October 14, 2002. D. The City further represents that Section 8-8-6F of the City's Aquifer Protection Ordinance authorizes the City to require certain site improvements to be installed by those businesses located within Aquifer Protection Zone #1 that store or use regulated substances in excess of the de minimis quantities. AGREEMENT--Page 1 E. AnMarCo is the owner of the Stoneway Batch Plant site located at 1915 Maple Valley Highway in Renton, Washington, which site is legally-described on Exhibit A, attached (the "Stoneway Site"). F. The Stoneway Site lies within an area that the City has mapped as a portion of Aquifer Protection Zone #1. Stoneway leases the site from AnMarCo and operates a concrete batch plant on the site plus associated cement waste water processing facilities, an associated truck maintenance and repair shop for Stoneway's trucks, an associated yard for parking of Stoneway's trucks, associated sand and gravel stockpiling areas and facilities, an associated building material warehouse and storage area, and an associated administrative office for Stoneway's operations (such facilities being collectively referred to in this Agreement as the "Existing Stoneway Facilities"). The existing concrete plant and most of the other portions of the Existing Stoneway Facilities have been operated on the Stoneway Site by Stoneway and Stoneway's predecessors since 1952. An earlier concrete plant had been operated on the site since the 1920s. G. AnMarCo and Stoneway contend that (1) the above-referenced provisions of the Aquifer Protection Ordinance are unconstitutional as applied to the Stoneway Site and Stoneway's operations on it, and (2) Stoneway, GMCC and AnMarCo will be significantly damaged by the City's enforcement of those provisions. Nevertheless, upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, AnMarCo and Stoneway are willing to agree upon a cessation of Stoneway's current industrial operations on the Stoneway Site by October 14, 2002. H. The City contends that (1) the above-referenced provisions of the Aquifer Protection Ordinance are constitutional as applied to the Stoneway Site and Stoneway's operations, and (2) the City's drinking water supply may be significantly damaged if the Stoneway Plant is operated beyond October 14, 2002. In the interest of protecting the City's drinking water aquifer, the City is willing to enter into this Agreement to avoid litigation and resolve a disputed matter. I. This Agreement is in settlement of existing disputes between the parties. Should litigation be forthcoming on any issues within this Agreement,the Agreement may not be used in evidence in such litigation. NOW, THEREFORE,in consideration of the mutual benefits and covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Cessation of Industrial Operations. Anmarco and Stoneway agree to cease industrial operations at the Stoneway site by October 14, 2002. 2. Removal of Regulated Substances. AnMarCo and Stoneway hereby agree to (a) permanently remove regulated substances in excess of the de minimis quantities from the Stoneway Site by October 14, 2002, either by relocation of the Stoneway Batch Plant operation or by other means, and (b) conduct such removal of regulated substances in accordance with the provisions of the Aquifer Protection Ordinance. AGREEMENT--Page 2 3. Recording of a Restrictive Covenant. AnMarCo shall record a restrictive covenant on the Stoneway Site in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B if the City timely completes its obligations under Subsection 4(a), below to provide AnMarCo and its heirs, successors and assigns with access from the current Stoneway Site to Maple Valley Highway via a signalized intersection in order to facilitate redevelopment of the site (the "Special Contingency"). 4. Commitments by the City; Contingent Waiver of Damage Claims by Stoneway and AnMarCo; Tolling of the Statute of Limitations. (a) "Signalized Access From the Stonewav Site to Maple Valley Highway". The City hereby promises to provide AnMarCo and its heirs, successors and assigns with access to Maple Valley Highway (SR-169) via a signalized intersection for primary vehicular ingress to and egress from the current Stoneway Site in conjunction with the site's redevelopment (the "Signalized Intersection") not later than August 1, 2003. This obligation shall be deemed to have been satisfied if, by that date, (i) the City has committed to issue all necessary permits and approvals for the construction and use of the Signalized Intersection and (ii) the City has secured all necessary approval(s) for the use of the Signalized Intersection from the Washington State Department of Transportation and from any other governmental agencies with jurisdiction. The City agrees to consider a request by AnMarCo and its heirs, successors and assigns to have transportation mitigation fees for the redevelopment of the Stoneway Site applied to the cost of designing and constructing the Signalized Intersection. Such fees may only be applied to the portion of the cost of this improvement, if any, which the City determines provides public benefit. (b) Redevelopment Credit. In recognition of the benefit accruing to the City from relocation of the Existing Stoneway Facilities and operations away from the City's drinking water aquifer, the City agrees to apply a redevelopment credit equal to the utility system development charges, and transportation and fire mitigation fees, for development of facilities which will substitute for the Existing Stoneway Facilities (such substitute facilities being hereinafter referred to as the "Substitute Facilities"), including without limitation the portions of the Substitute Facilities that Stoneway is planning at the Overmyer property along Houser Way). In the event that any of the Substitute Facilities are constructed on site(s) involving the construction of other facilities in addition to the Substitute Facilities, the Redevelopment Credit shall only extend to the portion involving the Substitute Facilities. (c) Cedar Crest Site Filling. The City agrees to work with Liberty Ridge L.L.C., a Washington limited liability company, and/or its affiliate(s) or . successors and assigns in a positive and supportive manner regarding the AGREEMENT--Page 3 filling and grading activities that Liberty Ridge L.L.C. and/or its affiliates are contemplating for the site previously planned for the "Cedar Crest" manufactured home development located at the southeast corner of the intersection of NE 3`1/4th Street and Edmonds Avenue (the "Cedar Crest Site Filling and Grading"). The City will work with Liberty Ridge L.L.C. and/or its affiliates or successors and assigns to resolve to the satisfaction of both parties such concerns as traffic control and possible deterioration of City roadways that might occur due to the transport of large quantities of fill material to that site. It is understood that a fill and grade permit or site plan application for such a project would be subject to a public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner. If the Special Contingency referred to in Section 3, above is timely met (such contingency being referred to herein as the "AnMarCo-Stoneway Contingent Waiver Condition"),then AnMarCo and Stoneway shall be deemed to have waived all present and future claims against the City of Renton for damages due to the application of(or regulation under) the Aquifer Protection Ordinance in relation to the Stoneway Site ("Aquifer Protection Ordinance- Caused Damages"--including without limitation damages stemming from the cessation of Stoneway's existing operations on the Stoneway Site and from the relocation of the Existing Stoneway Facilities from the Stoneway Site pursuant to this Agreement). In the event that the AnMarCo-Stoneway Contingent Waiver Condition is not timely met, AnMarCo and Stoneway shall not be deemed to have waived any such claims against the City. Because the parties wish to focus their respective energies and efforts upon effectuating the Special Contingency and thereby avoiding damage claim litigation, this Agreement provides time for the AnMarCo- Stoneway Contingent Waiver Condition to be met without prejudice to (a) claims for Aquifer Protection Ordinance-Caused Damages that AnMarCo and/or Stoneway could bring against the City and(b) damage claims that the City could bring against AnMarCo and/or Stoneway that are within the scope of the City's Waiver of Claims as defined in Section 8, below. The parties hereby agree that any statute(s) of limitation applicable to such claims shall be deemed tolled until the date that is six (6) years following the breach of this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement restricts AnMarCo or Stoneway or GMCC from filing claims against the City regarding damages that are beyond the scope of this Agreement or beyond the scope of the provisions of the Aquifer Protection Ordinance. 5. Limitation upon the City's Imposition of Site Improvements under the APO. In consideration of the benefits to the City under this Agreement, the City hereby agrees that it will not require any site improvements under subsection b (Site Improvements) of Section 8-8- 6.F.6 (Additional Operating Permit Requirements for Zone 1) of the Aquifer Protection Ordinance (as amended). 6. The City's Promise to Assist in Regulated Substances Reduction. The City of Renton will support and facilitate AnMarCo's and Stoneway's efforts to reduce the quantity of regulated substances on the Stoneway Site to levels below the de minimis amount in all ways that it can, consistent with City, State, and Federal law. AGREEMENT--Page 4 7. Suspension of Stoneway's Operating Permit if De Minimis Quantities Are Not Achieved. In the event that Stoneway and/or AnMarCo are not successful in reducing the amount of regulated substances on the Stoneway Site to below the de minimis quantities by October 14, 2002, the City will suspend Stoneway's operating permit in Zone 1 of the APA, whereupon Stoneway must immediately cease all operations of its concrete batch plant located on the Stoneway Site. 8. The City's Waiver of Any Claims Relating to the PCE Incident. AnMarCo and the City entered into an "Agreement Regarding Test Wells and Soil and Groundwater Sampling" (the "Initial Testing Agreement") dated February 5, 1998, as a follow-up to the City's contention that (a) a groundwater consultant for the City had collected groundwater samples from monitoring wells located near the Stoneway Site's bound sultant found them to be contaminated with tetrachloroethylene ("PCE"). In thatagr ementthenamong other things, the parties thereto agreed upon terms and conditions for the City's entry onto the Stoneway Site to construct monitoring wells, conduct sampling from them and have the tests sampled. After a series of tests were conducted concerning PCE, the City asserted that it believed that the detected PCE originated from a sediment pond on the Stoneway Site. Without admitting liability, on June 22, 1998, Stoneway proposed to do the following: (1) Remove the sediment from . . . three [Stoneway Site] sediment ponds, mix it with the soils stockpiled on the site for mixing (the "Stockpiled Soils"), and properly dispose of the soil-sediment mix; (2) Cease the import of soils for mixing with sediment effective Saturday, July 27, 1998, (which will leave processed aggregates from approved pits- -e.g., sands and gravels, crushed rock, quarry spalls and top soil--as the only"soils"that will be imported to the site after that date); (3) Remove any of the remaining Stockpiled Soils from the site; and (4) Notify the State of Washington Department of Ecology within the next week of the PCE incident and its resolution in progress. That proposal was acceptable to the City's Administrator of the Department of • Planning/Building/Public Works and, accordingly, Stoneway carried out those four points. Later, Stoneway and the City entered into a "Memorandum of Understanding" dated July 27,. 1999 (the "MOU"). The MOU, was executed to "clarify responsibility for ongoing monitoring during the cleanup of the sediment ponds and for a specified period thereafter" and set forth the following three operative points: 1. Monitoring shall consist of sampling three monitoring wells: MW- 31S, MW-40 and MW-42. The frequency of sampling shall be weekly during the cleaning of the ponds (estimated to be a period of about six to eight weeks) and monthly thereafter for four months. The City and Stoneway shall meet at the end of this time to evaluate whether there is a need for further monitoring. All of the samples are to be analyzed for PCE, pH, alkalinity, total dissolved solids, calcium,potassium, sodium, and chloride. AGREEMENT--Page 5 • 2. Stoneway and the City agree that PGG will contract with the City to perform the sampling and data analysis for this monitoring program. Samples will be analyzed by ARI Laboratories. The City will invoice Stoneway for all consultant costs (PGG) and laboratory costs associated with this monitoring program and Stoneway shall reimburse the City for these costs on a monthly basis. 3. This MOU covers only the groundwater monitoring program as described above. By agreeing to the terms of this MOU, (a) the City is not giving up any rights to pursue compensation from Stoneway for costs accrued to date and in the future relating to PCE on the Stoneway Site including, but not limited to, City staff time, consultant costs, legal costs, contractor costs, laboratory analysis costs, increased system operation costs (electricity, etc.), and system maintenance costs (pump replacement, metering equipment etc.) and (b) Stoneway is not admitting that it is liable for any such costs. Ongoing testing was done in accordance with the MOU's provisions. Contemporaneously with AnMarCo's waiver of claims for Aquifer Protection Ordinance- Caused Damages (whether such waiver occurs either by satisfaction of the AnMarCo-Stoneway Contingent Waiver Condition as described in Section 4 on Page 4, above, or pursuant to a separate writing whereby AnMarCo and Stoneway specifically waive such claims), the City will be deemed to have waived and released any and all claims against AnMarCo, Stoneway and GMCC and their respective partners, officers, directors, employees, and agents and against AnMarCo's successors and assigns with respect to the ownership of the Stoneway Site (collectively, the "Released Persons") accruing up to the date of execution of this Agreement by both parties and arising from or relating to the PCE incident referenced in this Section 8, including without limitation, any rights to pursue compensation from the Released Persons for costs or losses accrued to the date of execution of this Agreement arising from or relating to that PCE incident [including but not limited to City staff time, consultant costs, legal costs, contractor costs, laboratory analysis costs, increased system operation costs, electrical power costs, City well fields system maintenance costs (pump replacement, metering equipment, etc.) and lost water commodity value]—such waiver being herein referred to as the "City's Waiver of Claims". Nothing in this Agreement restricts the City from filing claims against Stoneway, AnMarCo or GMCC for damages for future losses arising from or relating to the PCE incident described in this Section 8 or for damages that are beyond the scope of this Agreement. 9. Effect of Successors. This Agreement and all of the terms and provisions hereof shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the heirs, executors, personal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 10. Partial Invalidity. If any provision of this Agreement is, becomes, or is deemed illegal, such provision shall be deemed amended to conform to applicable laws so as to be valid and enforceable, or, if it cannot be so amended without materially altering the intention of the parties, it shall be stricken and the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. AGREEMENT--Page 6 11. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties relative to the subject matter contained herein and correctly sets forth the rights, duties, and obligations of the parties. No oral representations or modifications regarding this Agreement shall have any force. 12. Headings. The section and paragraph headings in this Agreement are for the convenience of the parties only and are not intended to modify or define it in any way. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF RENTON, a Washington ANMARCO, a Washington Municipal Corporation General Partnership By: o'�i+-we�... By. 4417t Jes anner, Mayor Donald J. linlitdm:to tne okomlumilibo � R OF � ��/di STONEWAY CONCRETE, a � division of Gary Merlin Construction, Inc., a SEAL Washington Corporation Ina • 6°��•��� BY0 `,�Q�� ATTEST/AUT TICATED: Donald . erlino, President Marilyn t n, City Clerk of ROVED AS TO FORM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney AGREEMENT--Page 7 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the "Stoneway Site" GOVERNMENT LOTS 4 AND 7 AND THAT PORTION, IF ANY, OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 5 AND 6 AND THE SOUTHWEST % OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE RENTON-MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY NO. 1140 AND NORTH OF THAT CERTAIN BOUNDARY LINE ESTABLISHED BY PARAGRAPH 10 OF THAT CERTAIN DECREE IN EQUITY ENTERED IN SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY IN CAUSE NO. 90072 ON FEBRUARY 6, 1913, ALL IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M.; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD COMPANY'S RIGHT-OF-WAY WITH THE CENTER LINE PRODUCED NORTH 81°56' EAST OF FIRST AVENUE NORTH SHOWN AS "COUNTY ROAD" ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF CAR WORKS ADDITION TO RENTON, AS PER PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 15 OF PLATS, ON PAGE 47, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 23°38'45" WEST ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY 38.76 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF A COUNTY ROAD, WHICH POINT IS MARKED BY A CONCRETE MONUMENT; THENCE ALONG SAID COUNTY ROAD LINE NORTH 86°12' EAST 99.82 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 256.48 FEET, WHICH POINT IS IN THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF MAPLE VALLEY ROAD; THENCE CONTINUING ON SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE ON SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SAID MAPLE VALLEY ROAD,A DISTANCE OF 180.45 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID MAPLE VALLEY ROAD LINE SOUTH 41°25'EAST 1,228.45 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID LINE; THENCE SOUTH 47°32'30" WEST 273.25 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°26'00" WEST 251.95 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 39°24'35" WEST 73.20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 79°04'40" WEST 176.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27°58'20" WEST TO THE BOUNDARY LINE ESTABLISHED BY PARAGRAPH 10 OF THAT CERTAIN DECREE IN EQUITY ENTERED IN SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY IN CAUSE NO. 90072 OF FEBRUARY 6, 1913,AND TERMINUS OF SAID LINE; EXCEPT RIGHTS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND TO THAT PORTION, PAST AND PRESENT, IF ANY, OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED WHICH LIES BELOW THE LINE OF ORDINARY HIGH WATER OF THE CEDAR RIVER; AGREEMENT--Page 8 Exhibit A (Continued) AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHERLY OF THAT CERTAIN BOUNDARY.LINE ESTABLISHED BY PARAGRAPH 10 OF THAT CERTAIN DECREE OF EQUITY ENTERED IN SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY CAUSE NO. 90072 ON FEBRUARY 6, 1913, AND SOUTHERLY OF THE THREAD OF THE PRESENT CHANNEL OF THE CEDAR RIVER; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. SUBJECT TO EXISTING EASEMENTS, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, AND ENCUMBRANCES. AGREEMENT--Page 9 HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. A Professional Service Corporation David L Halinen,P.E. McCarver Square Tacoma(253)627-6680 davidhalinen@halinenlaw.com 2115 North 30th Street, Suite 203 Seattle(206)443-4684 Tacoma,Washington 98403 Fax(253)272-9876 January 25, 2002 HAND-DELIVERED City of Renton Development Services Division Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 1055 S. Grady Way, Sixth Floor DEvEo��LC'i'vEN U 9����� Renton, Washington 98055 JAH 2 8 202 �, ,v a Attn: Jason Jordan,Associate Planner y EMin f<l RE: Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area at 501 Monster Road SW,Renton Submittal of Land Use Permit Master Application and Materials for SEPA Review Dear Mr. Jordan: In follow-up to our recent conversations, on behalf of my client, Stoneway Concrete ("Stoneway"),I herewith submit Stoneway's Land Use Permit Master Application and associated materials for SEPA Review of the proposed Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area at 501 Monster Road SW,Renton. (The numbering scheme below corresponds to that used in the City's handout entitled"Submittal Requirements for Environmental Review".) (1) Land Use Permit Master Application and Plat Certificate with Recorded Documents: An original plus eleven (11) copies of the Land Use Permit Master Application plus four copies of a plat certificate with copies of recorded documents attached thereto; (2) Environmental Checklist: Twelve(12) copies; (3) Mailing Labels: Two (2)sets of self-adhesive mailing labels obtained from Chicago Title Insurance Company on January 25,2002 including the name, mailing address and King County Assessor's account numbers for all property owners within 300 feet of the subject site; (4) List of Surrounding Property Owners: Two (2) copies of a signed and notarized City of Renton Development Services "List of Surrounding Property Owners" form with an attached list obtained from Chicago Title Insurance Company on January 25, 2002 of all current property owners and their mailing addresses and King County Assessor's account numbers for all property owners within 300 feet of the subject site; City of Renton Development Services Division Attn: Jason Jordan,Associate Planner January 25, 2002 Page 2 (5) Fees: An application fee check from Stoneway in the amount of$1,000.00 payable to the order of the City of Renton for the plus a check from Halinen Law Offices, P.S. for postage (in an amount to be determined at the application submittal conference); (6) Preapplication Meeting Summary: Five (5) copies; (7) Project Narrative: Twelve(12) copies; (8) Construction Mitigation Description: Five(5) copies; (9) Neighborhood Detail Map: Twelve(12) copies; (10) Site Plan: Twelve (12) copies of a three-sheet set of plans prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers,Inc.that constitute the main project plans (Sheet 2 of which—the"Grading,Drainage and Temporary Erosion Control Plan"--amounts to the "Site Plan") and twelve (12) copies of a Schematic Parking Area Layout drawing; (11) Architectural Elevations: Requirement previously waived; (12) Grading Elevations: Part of the plan set referenced above under Item 10(Site Plan); (13) Utilities Plan, Generalized (sewer, water, stormwater, transportation improvements): Part of the plan set referenced above under Item 10 (Site Plan) (note that no sewer or water system improvements are planned— however, an irrigation system is planned and the design is set forth on the "Irrigation Plan"referred to under Item 19,below); (14) Drainage Control Plan: Part of the plan set referenced above under Item 10 (Site Plan); (15) Drainage Report: Four (4) copies of a Drainage Report prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers,Inc. dated January 24, 2002; (16) Geotechnical Reports: Five (5) copies of a January 18, 2002 Geotechnical Engineering Study report of the subject site prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc.; • City of Renton Development Services Division Attn: Jason Jordan,Associate Planner January 25, 2002 Page 3 (17) Flood Plain Map: Waived. (18) Wetlands Delineation Map and Wetlands Classification Study: Five (5) copies of a January 24, 2002 letter report from wetland consultant B & A, Inc. indicating that the northerlymost portion of the proposed site work lies outside of the required buffer of an existing wetland lying to the north of the subject site. (19) Landscaping Plan: Five(5)sets of copies of January 2,2002 plans prepared by Greenleaf Landscape Architecture entitled"Planting Plan"and"Irrigation Plan"; ' (20) Floor Plans: Waived; (21) Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan: Per your instruction to me during our meeting on Tuesday,January 22nd,I have simply had Barghausen Consulting Engineers add notes to Sheet 2 of the four-sheet Barghausen plan set stating (a) "EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED" in relation to two existing maple trees depicted near the center of the site and(b) "ALL TREES AND BRUSH WITHIN SITE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS NOT SHOWN ON SURVEY SHALL BE REMOVED DURING CLEARING AND GRADING OPERATIONS"; (22) Traffic Study: Waived; (23) Screening Detail, Refuse/Recycling(Elevation): Inapplicable and waived; (24) Plan Reductions: One (1) set of 8-1/2" x 11" PMT reductions of all of the submitted plan sheets and Neighborhood Detail Map and one set of photocopies of the PMTs; and (25) Colored Display Maps: One (1) set of colored-up copies of (a) the Neighborhood Detail Map and(b)and the Grading,Drainage and Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plan, which is the main"Site Plan" for the project (Sheet 2 of 3 of the three-sheet main set of drawings prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers). In addition, I herewith enclose a copy of the "Agreement Regarding Removal of Regulated Substances From the Stoneway Concrete Batch Plant Site Located at 1915 Maple Valley Highway, Renton" among the City, AnMarCo and Renton dated October 16, 2000 (the "Relocation Agreement"). Subsection(b)of Section 4 of the Relocation Agreement states as follows: • . City of Renton Development Services Division Attn: Jason Jordan,Associate Planner January 25, 2002 Page 4 (b) Redevelopment Credit. In recognition of the benefit accruing to the City from relocation of the Existing Stoneway Facilities and operations away from the City's drinking water aquifer, the City agrees to apply a redevelopment credit equal to the utility system development charges, and transportation and fire mitigation fees,for development offacilities which will substitute for the Existing Stoneway Facilities (such substitute facilities being hereinafter referred to as the "Substitute Facilities"), including without limitation the portions of the Substitute Facilities that Stoneway is planning at the Overmyer property along Houser Way). In the event that any of the Substitute Facilities are constructed on site(s) involving the construction of other facilities in addition to the Substitute Facilities, the Redevelopment Credit shall only extend to the portion involving the Substitute Facilities. (Emphasis added.) The proposed Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area is one of the proposed Substitute Facilities. Accordingly,on Stoneway's behalf,I request a redevelopment credit equal to any utility system development charges, and transportation and fire mitigation fees that would otherwise be due for the proposed Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area. (Because neither sewer nor water service is part of the project, I presume that no utility system development charges are required.) Should you have any questions or comments concerning this submittal,please let me know immediately. Sincerely, HALINEN LAW OFFICES,P.S. c \ David L. Ha 'nen Enclosures cc: Stoneway Rock&Recycling [Attn: Gary M. Merlin (with copies of enclosures)] Hal P. Grubb,P.E., Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. (with copies of certain of the enclosures) C:\CF\2009\016\TRUCK PARKINGUORDAN.LTI.DOC I - p CITY OF RENTON DEVEJ t r ®��E� o�a�NTO0 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION RE6b_� ,� PROPERTY OWNER(S) I PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: AnMarCo PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Attn: Gary Merlino, Partner Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area ADDRESS: 9125 10th avenue S. PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 501 Monster Road SW CITY: Seattle, WA ZIP: 98108 Renton, WA 98055 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206) 762-9125 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): Portion of 377920-0160-05 APPLICANT (if other than owner) EXISTING LAND USE(S): NAME: Miscellaneous storage PROPOSED LAND USE(S): COMPANY(if applicable): Stoneway Concrete Truck parking/storage area EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: 9125 10th Avenue S. Employment Area-Industrial (EAI) PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CITY: Seattle, WA ZIP: 98108 (if applicable): same TELEPHONE NUMBER (206) 762-9125 EXISTING ZONING: Heavy Industrial (IH) PROPOSED ZONING(if applicable): same CONTACT PERSON / Pa-cam./: /-f 8aee,r SITE AREA (in square feet): 174,000+/-(o'� NAME: David L. Halinen SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING THREE LOTS OR MORE(if applicable): COMPANY(if applicable): N/A Halinen Law Offices, P.S. PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ADDRESS: 2115 N. 30th Street, Suite 203 ACRE(if applicable): N/A NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS(if applicable): N/A CITY: Tacoma, WA ZIP: 98403 NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS(if applicable): N/A TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: (206) 443-4684 davidhalinen@halinenlaw.com jy\o2 -ei3 masterap.doc Revised January 2002 1 PI JECT INFORMATION (conti_ . ed) NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS(if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: $150,000.00 N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF 1 BUILDINGS(if applicable): N/A ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE(if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS(if applicable): N/A ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq.ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq.ft. BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq.ft. ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq.ft. I NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS(if ❑ WETLANDS sq.ft. applicable): N/A !l NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE I NEW PROJECT(if applicable): N/A I LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) 1 SITUATE IN THE SE QUARTER OF SECTION 14 , TOWNSHIP 24, RANGE 4 , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. - TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES Check all application types that apply--City staff will determine fees. _ANNEXATION(A) $ SHORELINE REVIEWS • _COMP PLAN AMENDMENT(CPA) $ _CONDITIONAL USE(SM-C) $ i CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CU-A,CU-H) $ _EXEMPTION(SME) $ NO CHARGE X ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW(ECF) $ MOO -6t _SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT(SM) $ _GRADE&FILL PERMIT(GF) $ _VARIANCE(SM-V) $ t (No.Cu.Yds: ) $ II —REZONE(R) $ SUBDIVISION _ROUTINE VEGETATION $ _BINDING SITE PLAN(BSP) $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT(RVMP) • _FINAL PLAT(FP) $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL(SA-A,SA-H) $ _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT(LLA) $ _SPECIAL PERMIT(SP) $ _PRELIMINARY PLAT(PP) $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT(TP) $ _SHORT PLAT(SHPL-A,SHPL-H) $ _VARIANCE(V-A,V-H,V-B) $ (from Section: ) $ - Postage: $ g•59-- _WAIVER(W) $ TOTAL FEE $ OTHER: $ It AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, • , -me) • , declare that I am (please check one) _the current owner of - : •perty involved in t I .-•'cation or the authorized representative to act for a corporation(please attach proof of authorization)an. •- e foregoing statements and answer -' contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of m .•:• edge and belief. r I certify that I know or have satisfactory evid-• i at -• this instrument and acknowledged ' • be his/her/their free a • • ntary act for the uses and purposes i mentio : '• the'.. anent. 1'1 (Signature of Owner/Representative) / LI Notary Public in and for the State of a ' on • i (Signature of Owner/Represen i Notary(Print) My appointment expires: erap.doc Revised January 2002 SEE ATTACHED AFFIDAVIT OF CWNERSHIP I I LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY THAT ENCOMPASSES THE STONEWAY TRUCK PARKING/STORAGE AREA SITE A TRACT OF LAND SITUATE IN LOTS 28A, 28B, 29, 30, 31 AND 33 OF JUNCTION ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SAID TRACT BEING BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 33, BOUNDED ON THE WEST AND SOUTHWEST BY A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL AND/OR CONCENTRIC WITH AND 50.0 FEET DISTANT EASTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES AND/OR RADIALLY, FROM,THE CENTERLINE OF MAIN TRACK OF THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, AS NOW CONSTRUCTED AND OPERATED, AND THE EASTERLY AND NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY AS NOW LOCATED, BOUNDED ON THE EAST BY THE WESTERLY LINE OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 24-23, 4-1 (ALSO KNOWN AS STEEL HILL-CHARLES MONSTER ROAD OR 68TH AVENUE SOUTH),AND BOUNDED ON THE NORTHEAST BY THE WESTERLY LINE OF BEACON COAL MINE ROAD; TOGETHER WITH ALL THOSE PORTIONS OF THE VACATED ROADWAYS ACROSS SAID LOTS 28B, 28A AND 33; EXCEPT PORTION OF LOT 33 LYING WITHIN THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; EXCEPT PORTION LYING NORTH OF THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF THE UNNAMED VACATED STREET IN LOT 33; AND EXCEPT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9408230332. • AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, GARY M.MERLINO, declare that (1)I am a partner of AnMarCo, a Washington general partnership, the owner of the property that is the subject of the attached City of Renton Land Use Permit Master Application for the requested approval of the Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area, and (2) the foregoing statements and answers contained in the attached Land Use Permit Master Application for the requested approval are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. GARY . MERLINO STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that GARY M. MERLINO is the person who appeared before me and acknowledged that he signed the instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as a partner of AnMarCo, a Washington general partnership, to be the free and voluntary act of such general partnership for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. waaapo® ..9Aes‘, @0 8January Dated: 25, 2002 EXa� eV( (Notary's Signature) i ..°° "1;1 Notaryblic iland for the • $ • s_9-o° State of Washington 'IIP i sj• �OF�P*'„ - ^11 M. J� s (Nqt 's Printed Name h�\\ � My Appointment Expires: 5 9/03 • C:\WINN\AFF-OWN.D1.DOC PROJECT NARRATIVE Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area 1 `,� 0/17',r"•;,. 501 Monster Road SW, Renton 1. Project Name, Size and Site Location The 4-acre Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area site is located at 501 Monster Road SW, Renton. byt 2. Zoning Designation of the Site and Adjacent Properties The Site. All of the site is zoned Heavy Industrial (IH). Adjacent Properties. The current zoning of adjacent properties is as follows: Property to the West (the northerly portion of the Black River Waste Reduction Center site, which abuts most of the Stoneway site's west boundary): Heavy Industrial (IH) (Renton zoning) Property to the North Lying West of Beacon Coal Mine Road: Heavy Industrial (HI) (Tukwila zoning) Property to the North Lying East of Beacon Coal Mine Road: Industrial (I) (King County Zoning) Property to the East: Heavy Industrial (IH) (Renton zoning) Property to the South: Heavy Industrial (IH) (Renton zoning) 3. Current Use of the Site and Any Existing Improvements The site is currently used for miscellaneous storage. Most of the site has some crushed rock on it. 4. Special Site Features An existing 3-cell storm water detention pond (which was constructed for the adjacent Black River Waste Reduction Center and which is now to be enlarged) is located at the site's northern end. 5. Soil types and drainage conditions Soil Types. According to the Geotechnical Report for the project prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc. (January 18, 2002), gravel, silty sand and sandy silt (along with topsoil in some areas are found on the site. There are no agricultural soils on the site. Page 1 January 25,2002 Drainage Conditions. The following is an excerpt from the January 24, 2002 Drainage Report for the Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The site slopes down to the west and all stormwater runoff is collected in a pipe drainage ' system and conveyed to an existing 3-cell stormwater detention pond at the site's northern end. The pond then discharges into an existing biofiltration swale that ultimately drains into a 24-inch steel pipe under the adjacent railroad right-of-way. That pipe then drains into the Duwamish River. The existing stormwater detention pond and biofiltration swale were previously designed and constructed as part of the Black River Waste Reduction Center. The Center's facilities (which include a collection/shipping facility for construction debris, a large paved area for container storage, heavy forklift loading, and truck maneuvering, and a railroad spur) lie to the south and west of the site of the proposed Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area. The existing pond was sized for those facilities and paving, and for a portion of the proposed truck parking/storage area. [Note that the site of the Black River Waste Reduction Center and the site of the proposed Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area have a common owner, AnMarCo, which is why the existing wet pond (with modifications) and the biofiltration swale are going to serve both developments.] Currently, most of the site of the proposed Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area has a gravel surface and is used as a miscellaneous storage area. That area also includes storm drainage outlets to the above-mentioned wet pond. III. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS As explained in Section II, above, after being detained and passing through the existing biofiltration swale, stormwater runoff from the Stoneway site and from the Black River • Waste Reduction Center currently discharges through a 24-inch diameter steel pipe that passes under the railroad right-of-way to the west and empties into the Green River (which becomes the Duwamish River further to the north). The discharge point is approximately 400 feet downstream from the Stoneway site. * i * IV. FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN The original stormwater detention pond on the Stoneway site was sized for the existing Black River Waste Reduction Center development with no extra volume for future development. The original pond volume required at the 100-year storm elevation was 9,828 cubic feet of storage. With the addition of the now proposed truck parking/storage area, the volume required within the stormwater detention pond at the 100-year storm elevation will be 17,917 cubic feet. The intent of the redesign is to (a)widen the existing pond in order to gain the additional volume necessary and (b) utilize the existing overflow control structure without any modifications. The existing biofiltration wale is adequate to convey the additional runoff from the proposed truck parking/store a area. Page 2 January 25,2002 6. Proposed use of the property and scope of the proposed development The proposed use of the property is truck parking/storage. Gravel trucks (and from time-to-time redi-mix concrete trucks) are anticipated to use the facility. The approximate areas of the site to be used for parking are set forth on the "Schematic Parking Area Layout" that is part of the submittal package. The scope of the proposed site improvements are set forth on the submitted civil and landscape drawings. 7. Access Primary access to the site will be via an asphalt-paved driveway connection to Monster Road S.W. as shown on the submitted civil drawings. That road connects to the south via Oakesdale Avenue to Grady Way and to the north to SR 900. Grady Way provides connections to Interstate 405 both to the west (at the West Valley Highway interchange) and to the east [at the Valley Freeway (SR 167)interchange]. Secondary access will be via a gravel driveway connection at the site's north end to Beacon Coal Mine Road. That road is connected to Monster Road SW. 8. Proposed off-site improvements (i.e., installation of sidewalks, fire hydrants, sewer main, etc.) At the south edge of the proposed paved access driveway with Monster Road SW, an existing handicap ramp is to be replaced to accommodate the driveway. 9. Total estimated construction cost and estimated fair market value of the proposed project Total estimated construction cost: $150,000. 10. Estimated quantities and type of materials involved if any fill or excavation is proposed Approximately 8,000 cubic yards of cut and 7,100 cubic yards of fill are anticipated. 11. Number, type and size of trees to be removed Two existing maple trees (18-inch and 24-inch caliper) near the center of the site are to be removed. Existing alder trees in the northeast portion of the site are also to be removed. 12. Explanation of any land to be dedicated to the City No land is anticipated to be dedicated to the City. 13. Any proposed job shacks,sales trailers, and/or model homes None. Page 3 January 25,2002 ° • ; , ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST INTRODUCTION Purpose of Checklist: • The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully,to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal,even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the word "project", "applicant", and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer", and "affected geographic area,"respectively. Page 1 • A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project,if applicable: Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area at 501 Monster Road SW 2. Name of applicant: Stoneway Concrete, a division of Gary Merlino Construction Co., Inc., a Washington corporation 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Contact Person: Stoneway Concrete David L. Halinen 9125-10`h Avenue S. Halinen Law Offices, P.S. Seattle, WA 98055 10500 NE 8th Street, Suite 1900 (206) 762-9125 Bellevue, WA 98004 (425)454-8272 4. Date checklist prepared: January 25, 2002 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing,if applicable): Site construction is anticipated during mid-2002. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions,expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared,directly related to this proposal. This SEPA Checklist. A January 18, 2002 Geotechnical Engineering Study report of the subject site prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc. Page 2 A January 24, 2002 letter report from wetland consultant B & A, Inc. indicating that the northerlymost portion of the proposed site work lies outside of the required buffer of an existing wetland lying to the north of the subject site. A January 24, 2002 Drainage Report from Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. concerning proposed site drainage (including the planned expansion of the existing stormwater detention pond on the subject site). 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Renton approval of a Grading Permit/License. 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) She Q.a.R-a- = I5,g �o The proposal is to construct and use a gravel-surfaced truck parking/storage area on an approximately 4.0-acre site along the west side of Monster Road SW and the west side of Beacon Coal Mine Road in the vicinity of the intersection of those two roads. • The City considers the proposed use to be a "heavy equipment sales, storage repair" use(a use permitted outright) under the site's Heavy Industrial(IH)zoning. The construction will involve site excavation of approximately 8,000 cubic yards of soil and site filling of approximately 7,100 cubic yards of that excavated soil. The difference (approximately 900 cubic yards) will be hauled by truck from the site. An existing 3-cell stormwater detention pond on the site (which was originally sized for the adjacent Black River Waste Reduction Center) is to be expanded as part of the current proposal to accommodate runoff from the subject truck parking/storage area as well as from the Center. An existing biofiltration swale into which the pond discharges will serve both the proposed truck parking/storage area and the Center Existing and proposed site grades, two proposed driveway connections, and the proposed expansion of the existing storm water detention pond are depicted on the January 24, 2002 Grading, Drainage and Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plan prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. for the proposal submitted to the City with this Checklist. Proposed landscaping and landscape irrigation Page 3 • features of the proposal are set forth on the January 2, 2002 Planting Plan and Irrigation Plan prepared by Greenleaf Landscape Architecture for the proposal. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map,if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The site's address is 501 Monster Road SW. The site lies along the west side of Monster Road SW and the west side of Beacon Coal Mine Road in the vicinity of the intersection of those two roads A vicinity map is set forth on the Cover Sheet of the three-sheet set of civil drawings prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. for the proposal. The layout of the site is depicted on both Sheets 1 and 2 of that drawing set. The site comprises the northeasterly portion of the property that is legally described as follows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• EXCEPT PORTION LYING NORTH OF THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF THE UNNAMED VACATED STREET IN LOT 33; AND EXCEPT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9408230332. The Black River Waste Reduction Center lies on the balance of that legally-described property. The entirety of that property is owned by AnMarCo. Page 4 • 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan map as environmentally sensitive? No. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Small portions of the site have slopes as steep as approximately 80 percent. However, all such slopes have a vertical dimension substantially less than 15 feet. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. According to the Geotechnical Report Gravel, silty sand and sandy silt (along with topsoil in some areas) are found on the site. There are no agricultural soils on the site. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The purpose of the proposed site grading is to excavate approximately 8,000 cubic yards of soil and fill approximately 7,100 cubic yards of soil (with the approximately 900-cubic yard difference to be hauled from the site) in order to create grades conducive to the proposed Truck Parking/Storage Area. Existing and'proposed site grades are depicted on the January 24, 2002 Grading and Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plan prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.for the proposal that has been submitted to the City. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Page 5 • Yes, erosion could occur during clearing and construction, although it is anticipated to be minimal due to the planned implementation of erosion/sedimentation control measures. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example,asphalt or buildings)? About 2.6 percent of the site (the site's proposed new 4,467-square foot asphalt- paved main entrance driveway) will be covered with new asphalt. Total asphalt surfacing (both the new asphalt and the approximately 9,030-square feet of existing asphalt driveway area at the south end of the site) will cover about 7.7 percent of the site. (Crushed rock surfacing and landscaping along the street edge will cover the balance of the site.) h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth,if any: As depicted upon the January 24, 2002 . Grading and Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plan prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.for the proposal, measures to reduce and control erosion include installation of silt fences, a temporary sedimentation trap, a temporary "V" ditch, a rock check dam and a temporary catch basin. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Exhaust emissions will be produced by motorized construction equipment during the construction of the Truck Parking/Storage Area. Exhaust emissions will also be produced by the trucks that ultimately use the Truck Parking/Storage Area. Dust emissions may also occur during construction of the Truck Parking/Storage Area. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Page 6 1 During dry weather construction of the Truck Parking/Storage Area, a water truck will wet down the site to reduce dust emissions. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The nearest edge (northeasterly corner) of the project (involving the planned expansion of the existing storm water detention pond on the subject site) lies approximately 400 feet from the Green River. (The BNSF railroad right-of-way and tracks lie between the site and the Green River.) A small existing wetland lies to the north-northwest of the northwest portion of the subject site. (According to the above-referenced letter report from B &A, Inc., the outer edge of the required buffer from that wetland lies entirely outside of the nearest point of any proposed activity on the subject site.) 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The project will not require any work within 200 feet of the Green River. Regrading of the northwest portion of the storm water detention pond will occur within 200 feet of the above-mentioned wetland, although the outer edge of the regulatory buffer from that wetland lies entirely outside of the nearest point of any proposed activity on the subject site. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Page 7 No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage: industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe. The source of runoff is storm water runoff. The site slopes down to the west and all storm water runoff will be collected in a pipe drainage system and conveyed to the existing 3-cell stormwater detention pond(which is to be enlarged) located at the site's northern end. The pond discharges into an existing biofiltration swale that ultimately drains into a 24-inch steel pipe under the adjacent railroad right-of-way. That pipe then drains into the Green River. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts,if any: Page 8 The existing storm water detention pond on the Stoneway site was sized for the existing Black River Waste Reduction Center development. The original pond volume required at the 100-year storm elevation was 9,828 cubic feet of storage. With the addition of the now proposed truck parking/storage area, the volume required within the storm water detention pond at the 100-year storm elevation will be 17,917 cubic feet. The pond redesign is intended to (a) widen the existing pond in order to gain the additional volume necessary and (b) utilize the existing overflow control structure without modification. The existing biofiltration swale is adequate to convey the runoff from both the proposed truck parking/storage area and the existing Black River Waste Reduction Center. 4. Plants a. Check or underline types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder,maple, aspen, other: X evergreen tree: fir, cedar,pine, other: X shrubs X grass pasture wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup,bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass,milfoil, other: other types of vegetation: b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Two existing maple trees near the center of the site will be removed as well as about eight alders lying in the northeastern portion of the site. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,if any: Hogan Cedar trees(Thuja plicata "Hogan"), Globe Norway Maple Trees (Acer Platanoids "Globosum"), King Edward Red Flowering Current Trees (Ribes sanquineum "King Edward VIII"), Compact Strawberry Madrone (Abutus undeo "Compacta") and Vancouver Jade Kinnickinnick (Acrostaphyllos uva- ursa "Vancouver Jade") are to be planted along the east edge of the site as called for by the landscape planting plan prepared by Greenleaf Landscape Architecture submitted with the subject application. Page 9 • 5. Animals a. Underline any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: squirrels, chipmunks,raccoons, coyotes- fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain. The Puget Sound Basin, where the subject property is located, is part of the Pacific flyway for migratory birds. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any: None. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,manufacturing, etc. N/A (The site is to be used for truck parking/storage.) b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal: List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any: N/A 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Page 10 , No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic,equipment operation, other)? None. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise from heavy equipment involved with site grading and installation of the planned site improvements will occur during the period of site construction. During the period of use, truck-related noise will be generated. Ordinarily, truck noise will occur when (a) trucks on the site warm-up before leaving the site in the morning and (b) truck return to the site and park during the late afternoon or evening. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any: 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Most of the site is currently used for miscellaneous storage. The current uses of adjacent properties are as follows: Property to the West (abutting most of the site's west boundary): An asphalt- paved storage lot that is part of the Black River Waste Reduction Center. (Railroad lines lie directly to the west of that storage lot.) Property to the North Lying West of Beacon Coal Mine Road: Vacant Page 11 Property to the North Lying East of Beacon Coal Mine Road: This property is zoned Industrial (I) by King County. A few older houses in this area appear to have some sort of small businesses operating out of them. Property to the East: Industrial Uses(including Renton Concrete Recyclers) Property to the South: Black River Waste Reduction Center b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. An existing 6-foot high concrete block wall lies along much of the site's west edge. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Heavy Industrial(IH) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Employment Area Industrial(EAI) g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so,specify. Not to our knowledge. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. Page 12 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,if any: The proposed use is an outright permitted use under the site's Heavy Industrial Zoning. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,middle,or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any: Not applicable. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? The existing 6-foot high concrete block wall along the site's west edge is proposed to be increased to 9 feet in height. • b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Hogan Cedar trees(Thuja plicata "Hogan"), Globe Norway Maple Trees (Acer Platanoids "Globosum"), King Edward Red Flowering Current Trees (Ribes sanquineum "King Edward VIII"), Compact Strawberry Madrone (Abutus undeo "Compacta") and Vancouver Jade Kinnickinnick (Acrostaphyllos uva- ursa "Vancouver Jade") are to be planted along the east edge of the site as Page 13 • called for by the landscape planting plan prepared by Greenleaf Landscape Architecture submitted with the subject application. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur. When trucks leave the site before daylight or return after dark, the truck headlights will be on. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any: Most of the site will lie about ten feet below the grade of Beacon Coal Mine Road and Monster Road on the east side of the site. The grade differential will minimize truck headlight glare to the east. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? N/A b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreational opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any? N/A Page 14 • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state,or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any: Not applicable. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans,if any. Access to the site is provided primarily by Monster Road S.W., which connects to the south via Oakesdale Avenue to Grady Way and to the north to SR 900. Grady Way provides connections to Interstate 405 both to the west (at the West Valley Highway interchange) and to the east [at the Valley Freeway (SR 167) interchange]. See the attached 8-1/2-inch by 11-inch map entitled "Projected Traffic Distribution". b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. There is public transit service on Grady Way to the south and SR 900 to the north. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project would have space for about 47 gravel truck-trailer combinations, which is currently expected to be the usual type of truck parked at the site. Other type of heavy trucks may be parked at the site from time-to-time, such as redi-mix concrete trucks. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Page 15 No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail,or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The site lies to the east of Union Pacific rail lines and BNSF rail lines. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The applicant estimates that the truck parking/storage operation will ordinarily generate approximately 47 outgoing trips and 47 return trips, with the outgoing trips usually occurring early in the morning and returning late in the afternoon. The estimated percentage distribution of those trips is set forth on the attached 8-1/2-inch by 11-inch map entitled "Projected Traffic Distribution". g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any: 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any. N/A 16. Utilities a. Underline utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Water service (for the landscape irrigation system), which is currently provided by the City of Renton Page 16 C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. r? • Signature: Hal P. rubb, P.E. Barghausen Consulting Engineers,Inc. Date Submitted: January 25, 2002 Page 17 CO / g. C' 09l MilRT/N 4UTyFR M /17NG ) /,T` GREEN --,:o dly wq y /i'G/P SITE 9 '% F s RA/ER -7 cn 0 NIL.' MONSTER ROAD SW OAKDA S►N A VE \ 4: Cr \ tilkii."1 11111°1111 --.... 1 FIGURE 1 : VICINITY MAP MERLINO CONSTRUCTION B & A, INC. GIG HARBOR, WA 98335 (BA #3534) Z Z CI Z '1/4.--..--%- •Niih,,-..._-----=•--- kJ it iLL! 1%r0324 0 , Z '� 1 V O V i Q \, Si 8'34b 4390 E w :4p' co z .4 N. EX. GRAVEL \ � ACCESS DRIVE 411 / - .! \"....,,,,,.,,,,,„ ,„, ..„,,,,,,, it4,0 — i 1 #01-e -i.-.-------- ' -\ ; 1 „ ,1,, ,, 74,141> I pi I s tin1; l ; 11 f\j�'•' ( \„` .• • .\\ „, % :{e 'r , i i ,t N1,111; ! lti SDe EXISTING ;t l 11 1'� } 1 1 ON{t �� �� �4 BIO-SWALE 1."' } 1 `1sli \ 1 ti /\ .,` \ d 1 1 1 Fl1ddi / ��\\�,� DETENTION \ E POND a ; ;1 i'i{#{! ; �``\`\ V Z co FIGURE 2 : SITE PLAN M MERLINO CONSTRUCTION o B & A, INC. v GIG HARBOR, WA 98335 (BA #3534) HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. A Professional Service Corporation David L Halinen,P.E. McCarver Square Tacoma(253)627-6680 davidhalinen(Jialinenlaw.com 2115 North 30th Street, Suite 203 Seattle(206)443-4684 Tacoma,Washington 98403 Fax(253)272-9876 January 25, 2002 HAND-DELIVERED City of Renton Development Services Division . DEVELOr Department of Planning/Building/Public Works c1,- 1055 S. Grady Way, Sixth Floor JAN Renton, Washington 98055 fAEChicz,, Attn: Jason Jordan,Associate Planner RE: Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area at 501 Monster Road SW, Renton Submittal of Land Use Permit Master Application and Materials for SEPA Review Dear Mr. Jordan: In follow-up to our recent conversations, on behalf of my client, Stoneway Concrete ("Stoneway"),I herewith submit Stoneway's Land Use Permit Master Application and associated materials for SEPA Review of the proposed Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area at 501 Monster Road SW, Renton. (The numbering scheme below corresponds to that used in the City's handout entitled"Submittal Requirements for Environmental Review".) (1) Land Use Permit Master Application and Plat Certificate with Recorded Documents: An original plus eleven (11) copies of the Land Use Permit Master Application plus four copies of a plat certificate with copies of recorded documents attached thereto; (2) Environmental Checklist: Twelve(12) copies; (3) Mailing Labels: Two (2) sets of self-adhesive mailing labels obtained from Chicago Title Insurance Company on January 25,2002 including the name, mailing address and King County Assessor's account numbers for all property owners within 300 feet of the subject site; (4) List of Surrounding Property Owners: Two (2) copies of a signed and notarized City of Renton Development Services "List of Surrounding Property Owners" form with an attached list obtained from Chicago Title Insurance Company on January 25, 2002 of all current property owners and their mailing addresses and King County Assessor's account numbers for all property owners within 300 feet of the subject site; City of Renton Development Services Division Attn: Jason Jordan,Associate Planner January 25, 2002 Page 2 (5) Fees: An application fee check from Stoneway in the amount of$1,000.00 payable to the order of the City of Renton for the plus a check from Halinen Law Offices, P.S. for postage (in an amount to be determined at the application submittal conference); (6) Preapplication Meeting Summary: Five(5) copies; (7) Project Narrative: Twelve (12) copies; (8) Construction Mitigation Description: Five(5) copies; (9) Neighborhood Detail Mau: Twelve(12) copies; (10) Site Plan: Twelve (12) copies of a three-sheet set of plans prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers,Inc.that constitute the main project plans (Sheet 2 of which—the"Grading,Drainage and Temporary Erosion Control Plan"--amounts to the "Site Plan") and twelve (12) copies of a Schematic Parking Area Layout drawing; (11) Architectural Elevations: Requirement previously waived; (12) Grading Elevations: Part of the plan set referenced above under Item 10(Site Plan); (13) Utilities Plan, Generalized (sewer, water, stormwater, transportation improvements): Part of the plan set referenced above under Item 10 (Site Plan) (note that no sewer or water system improvements are planned— however, an irrigation system is planned and the design is set forth on the "Irrigation Plan"referred to under Item 19,below); (14) Drainage Control Plan: Part of the plan set referenced above under Item 10 (Site Plan); (15) Drainage Report: Four (4) copies of a Drainage Report prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers,Inc. dated January 24, 2002; (16) Geotechnical Reports: Five (5) copies of a January 18, 2002 Geotechnical Engineering Study report of the subject site prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc.; City of Renton Development Services Division Attn: Jason Jordan,Associate Planner January 25, 2002 Page 3 (17) Flood Plain Map: Waived. (18) Wetlands Delineation Map and Wetlands Classification Study: Five (5) copies of a January 24, 2002 letter report from wetland consultant B & A, Inc. indicating that the northerlymost portion of the proposed site work lies outside of the required buffer of an existing wetland lying to the north of the subject site. (19) Landscaping Plan: Five(5)sets of copies of January 2,2002 plans prepared by Greenleaf Landscape Architecture entitled"Planting Plan"and"Irrigation Plan"; (20) Floor Plans: Waived; (21) Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan: Per your instruction to me during our meeting on Tuesday,January 22nd,I have simply had Barghausen Consulting Engineers add notes to Sheet 2 of the four-sheet Barghausen plan set stating (a) "EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED" in relation to two existing maple trees depicted near the center of the site and(b) "ALL TREES AND BRUSH WITHIN SITE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS NOT SHOWN ON SURVEY SHALL BE REMOVED DURING CLEARING AND GRADING OPERATIONS"; (22) Traffic Study: Waived; (23) Screening Detail,Refuse/Recycling(Elevation): Inapplicable and waived; (24) Plan Reductions: One (1) set of 8-1/2" x 11" PMT reductions of all of the submitted plan sheets and Neighborhood Detail Map and one set of photocopies of the PMTs; and (25) Colored Display Maps: One (1) set of colored-up copies of (a) the Neighborhood Detail Map and(b)and the Grading,Drainage and Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plan, which is the main "Site Plan" for the project (Sheet 2 of 3 of the three-sheet main set of drawings prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers). In addition, I herewith enclose a copy of the "Agreement Regarding Removal of Regulated Substances From the Stoneway Concrete Batch Plant Site Located at 1915 Maple Valley Highway, Renton" among the City, AnMarCo and Renton dated October 16, 2000 (the "Relocation Agreement"). Subsection(b) of Section 4 of the Relocation Agreement states as follows: City of Renton Development Services Division Attn: Jason Jordan,Associate Planner January 25, 2002 Page 4 (b) Redevelopment Credit. In recognition of the benefit accruing to the City from relocation of the Existing Stoneway Facilities and operations away from the City's drinking water aquifer, the City agrees to apply a redevelopment credit equal to the utility system development charges, and transportation and fire mitigation fees,for development of facilities which will substitute for the Existing Stoneway Facilities(such substitute facilities being hereinafter referred to as the "Substitute Facilities"), including without limitation the portions of the Substitute Facilities that Stoneway is planning at the Overmyer property along Houser Way). In the event that any of the Substitute Facilities are constructed on site(s) involving the construction of other facilities in addition to the Substitute Facilities, the Redevelopment Credit shall only extend to the portion involving the Substitute Facilities. (Emphasis added.) The proposed Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area is one of the proposed Substitute Facilities. Accordingly,on Stoneway's behalf,I request a redevelopment credit equal to any utility system development charges, and transportation and fire mitigation fees that would otherwise be due for the proposed Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area. (Because neither sewer nor water service is part of the project, I presume that no utility system development charges are required.) Should you have any questions or comments concerning this submittal,please let me know immediately. Sincerely, HALINEN LAW OFFICES,P.S. c � David L. Ha 'nen Enclosures cc: Stoneway Rock&Recycling [Attn: Gary M. Merlin (with copies of enclosures)] Hal P. Grubb,P.E.,Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. (with copies of certain of the enclosures) C:\CF\2009\016\TRUCK PARKING\JORDAN.LT I.DOC Earth ( )nsultants Inc. Letter of '" GeotechnicalEn neers,Geolo s&EnvironmentalScientists • Transmittal „To. � 1805 - 136th Place Northeast, Suite 201 Bellevue,Washington 98005 Phone: (425) 643-3780 / Fax: (425) 746-0860 Toll Free: 1-888-739-6670 TO: Stoneway Concrete DATE: January 18, 2002 1915 Maple Valley Hwy JOB NO.: E-9875 Renton, Washington 98055 PROJECT: Beacon Coal Mine Road & Monster Road ATTENTION: David Halinen WE ARE SENDING YOU: I Attached ❑ Under Separate Cover Via: FlEcov THE FOLLOWING: E � ❑ Field Reports /1 Reports ❑ Preliminary Drafts ❑ Test Results JAN 2 7 2002 Per Your Request ❑ H1L/NEN 1 a W FFICES pQ dt! t1�1" � r.t�. Copies Date Description 4 1/18/02 GES Report THESE ARE TRANSMITTED FOR YOUR: ❑ Information ❑ Files ❑ Approval 0 Review and Comments- •,,-❑;Signature 0 Distribution ❑ 0 �Nsryb� 2 v ) REMARKS: ,I.L:_,C��_��il. '.. cc: 1. Gary Merlino Construction Co. ATTN. Gary Merlin° (2 Copies) 2. Halinen Law Offices, PS ATTN. David Halinen (1 Copy) 3. Barghausen Consulting Engineers ATTN. Joe Hopper (1 Copy) 4. ATTN. BY Nicolette Hahn C U v D AUIG' 6 121 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUF, .pEFARTMENT DATE: ��j� - 0 / JAN b TO: Construction Services, Fire P - tion, Plan Review, EDNSP, L C�� /Ir -, Project Planner �U I ) FROM: Neil Watts, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: '�U�, �w61,;,,tr -�- LOCATION: 501 Mons 1-v( 3 U) PREAPP NO. piol 1 ? I - 6 A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for ri = 47) ec,.,�. , Thursday, A4A,9,1 oZ5 . ., in one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new City Hall). I this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the • applicant. You will not need to.do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. so ore a meeting. Thank you. , pep' � srte en�� �ccPrss `co r qice l • a- #76rita c,a 7,-p az,1 t- 0110./ a$'e 4„,at, fi, ELO E f Fi r1, CITY OF REN T ON AUG 0 6 2C:ill RECEIVED H:\Division.s\Develop.ser\Dev&Plan.ing\Template\Preapp2 Revised 9/00 CITY OF RENTON Development Services Erosion and Sediment Control and the Endangered Species Act Preventing Runoff during the Wet Season - October 1st- April 30th The City of Renton is committed to an effective erosion and sediment control program to protect our streams, lakes, wetlands and the aquatic species that inhabit them. We look forward to working with our customers to meet this goal. With the listing of the Chinook Salmon and the Bull Trout,onto the federal Endangered Species List, Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) is critical. As part of the City's approach.to the ESA listings, enhanced erosion and sediment control site inspections for permitted activities is mandatory. City Inspectors will address code violations on non-permitted sites relating to the protection of listed - species. Additional technical assistance in the area of erosion control during the construction of your project is • available. The City of Renton's utility inspection staff will offer suggestions to help you stay in - compliance with City Code. At the same time, it is your responsibility to implement and maintain controls on the job site. This needs to be done in a manner that will prevent any silt-laden water from leaving the project site or from entering streams, wetlands, and/or off-site drainage systems. Discharge into these areas, along with. non-compliance• of City standards, will result in code enforcement action taken on your project. . The 'Wet Season' occurs from October 1st through April• 30th. A_guideline of minimum - requirements that will help keep your site in compliance is provided below. A complete interpretation • of these requirements may be found in Appendix D of the King County Surface Water Design . Manual. This manual is available at all King County libraries and may also be purchased.at King County DDES by calling (206) 296-6600. Keep the Ground Covered: . • Minimize the amount of existing vegetation that you must disturb for construction:Keep out of sensitive areas and their buffers. . • All disturbed areas shall be covered and/or mulched within 12 hours, if they are to remain • • unworked for more than 2 days. • Areas not being worked for 30 days or more shall be vegetated; unless.the City determines that winter weather makes vegetation establishment.infeasible. If this is the case, it must still be more permanently stabilized, using methods such as bonded fiber matrix, or other more • stable BMP's. • Slopes and stockpiles 3H:1 V or steeper and.more than 10 feet of vertical relief shall be covered if they are unworked for more than 12 hours. • • All areas not being worked prior to October 1, and are being seeded, shall be seeded by September 23. Mulching is required to protect all seeded areas until an adequate growth is established. • • Areas that are being hydro seeded shall have a tackifier mixed into the"hydro seed to help stabilize mixture onto the soil. • Enough cover material to sufficiently protect all disturbed areas shall be stockpiled on the site at the beginning of the wet season. . CITY OF RENTON MEMO UTILITY REVIEW TO: Jason Jordan FROM: Jan Iilian x7216 DATE: August 16, 2001 . • SUBJECT: PREAPPLICATON REVIEW COMMENTS PREAPP NO. 01-081 • STONEWAY TRUCK PARKING LOT 501 —MONSTER RD SW NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT: • The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre- application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or.concurrence by official decision makers (e.g. Hearing Examiner,.Boards of Adjustment, Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant.. SURFACE WATER . 1. A drainage plan and drainage report will be required for the site plan application.The drainage report shall address detention and water quality treatment sized for the new impervious surface • area subject to vehicular access. The design and report shall address the Core Requirements and/or Special Requirements as outlined in the King County: Surface Water Manual (1990 edition). • 2. Effective October 1, through April 30th special erosion control measures during the wet season will be required.A copy is attached. _ . 3. Surface Water System Development Charges.(SDC) Will be assessed based on.the total new impervious surface square footage as reflected in the final design. The charge is determined by multiplying the gross square footage by$0.129. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Rockeries or retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height will.be require a separate building permit and shall have the following separate note be includedon the civil plan: "A licensed engineer with geo technical expertise will be retained for proposed rockeries greater than four feet in height. The engineer must monitor rockery construction and verify in writing that the rockery was constructed in general accordance with ARC standards and with his/her supplemental recommendations, in a professional manner and of .competent and suitable material. Written verification by the engineer must be provided to the City of Renton public works inspector prior to approval of an occupancy permit or plat approval for the project. A separate building permit will be required." . 2. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards.. . CITY OF RENTON Development Services Final Site Stabilization Standards for Erosion/Sediment Control 1. All disturbed areas of the site must be vegetated or otherwise permanently stabilized: All disturbed areas must be seeded AND mulched with a high likelihood that sufficient cover will develop shortly after final approval, i.e., signs of vegetation growth is visible, such that a cover will be established within 7 days after final approval: . . • In addition to mulch and seed, an erosion control mat or blanket should be installed to assure that measures stay in place, if: •Vegetative cover will not be established within 7 days, and/or, • • If the area is not being landscaped within 30 days, and/or, • If the area is on or adjacent to a slope. Lots within a plat that are to be developed under an approved building permit immediately - following plat approval may use mulch and/or temporary seeding. (This does not preclude . temporary erosion and sediment control during plat and building construction.) . Small areas to be landscaped prior to October 1 may be mulched without seed. After - October 1, all areas require mulching with seed. Other measures such as permanent • landscaping or sodding must be used if seed and mulch are inadequate. • 2. Structural measures (i.e. silt fences, pipe slope drains, construction entrances, storm drain inlet protection, sediment traps and ponds) must be removed from the:site. Measures that will quickly decompose may be left in place (i.e., brush barriers, organic mulch) Remove silt fences in conjunction with seeding so machinery doesn't have to be brought back in • to remove the fencing later and disturb site resulting in an additional area needed protection. The - . City inspector must approve the applicant's proposal to remove silt fencing prior to the establishment of vegetation. The City Inspector can allow some or all ESC measures to be left in place for use during subsequent development i.e. residential building following plat development). This will be determined on a site-specific basis. • 3. All permanent surface water facilities, including catch basins (on- and off-site), manholes, pipes, ditches, channels, flow control facilities and water quality facilities, must be cleaned. • 4. If only the infrastructure of the site has been developed (e.g., subdivisions and short plats) with construction to occur under a different permit, the sensitive areas buffers, Sensitive Areas Tracts, • • or Sensitive Area Setback Areas must be clearly marked (per the KCSWDM,Appendix D, Section • D.4.1). PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL IS THE RESPONSIBILITY-OF THE OWNER. The site must be kept stabilized after final approval using landscaping, mulch, or other measures to prevent sediment-laden water from leaving the site and to prevent sediment from being transported onto • adjacent properties and roads. Revised August 16,2001 H:/division.s/develop.ser/plan.rev./erosion control • Final Stabilization: - Prior to final construction approval, the following conditions must be met: • All disturbed areas of the site will be vegetated or otherwise permanently stabilized; • Structural measures such as silt fence, slope drains, etc. will be removed from site; • All permanent surface water facilities including catch basins, pipes, etc. will be cleaned; • Any off-site catch basins that required protection will also be cleaned; and • If only the infrastructure of the site has been developed such as short plats and subdivisions,. with building construction to occur under a different permit, then the sensitive area buffers, tracts, and setbacks will be clearly marked. City of Renton, Development Services staff is available to answer any questions you may have about erosion and sediment control and wet season stabilization:measures for permitted activities in the City of Renton. Please call 425-430-7200. • Revised August 16,2001 H:/division.s/develop.ser/plan.revierosion control • CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: August 23,2001 TO: Pre-Application File No.01-081 FROM: Jason E.Jordan, Associate Planner,x7219 • SUBJECT: AnMarCo Property General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above-referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner,Zoning Administrator, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works,and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or. • made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for$55.00, plus tax,from ' the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall. Project Proposal:The subject site is located at the intersection of 68th Avenue South and Beacon Coal Mine Road.. The overall project area is roughly 2.5 acres in size. The proposal is to grade the north-easternmost portion of the property(approximately 10,400 cubic yards)to facilitate a parking/storage area for gravel haul trucks. The parking/storage area is proposed to be surfaced with gravel. In addition,the applicant is proposing to enlarge the existing on-site detention and water quality pond facility to handle the additional impervious surface runoff that will be created with this proposal. Zoning:The subject site is designated Heavy Industrial (IH)on the City's Zoning Map. The gravel parking/storage area would be considered a"heavy equipment sales, storage, repair"use, which is an outright permitted use in the IH zone. Development Standards:The IH zone development standards and the parking regulations would apply only to new building construction and uses. Because the project does not discuss proposed new buildings, it cannot be determined if the project's in compliance with these standards. However, the development standards area addressed below, and would be required if applicable: Building Restrictions—The IH zone does not contain provisions restricting building height or lot coverage. Building Setbacks—A minimum setback of 20 feet is required from arterial right-of-ways and 15 feet is required from all other street designations. Rear or side yard setback requirements are not applicable to the project. The proposed building complies with all building setback requirements. Landscaping—The IH zone requires all portions of the site not covered by buildings,structures, required parking, access,circulation or service areas to be maintained as permeable areas improved with native,drought-resistant vegetative cover. A minimum landscape width of 20 feet is required along arterial streets and a minimum width of 15 feet is required along all other street designations. All landscape areas must be a minimum of 5 feet in width and are required to contain underground irrigation systems. At the time of formal application submittal, a detailed landscape plan indicating the location, sizes, and types of the proposed plantings will be required. Screening—All outdoor(vehicle)storage,garbage, refuse compactor or dumpster areas must be screened by a fence, landscaping, or combination of both in order to achieve visual screening. . AnMarCo Property - Pre-Application Meeting Page 2 of Approval of the proposed locations of dumpster or compactor areas by Waste Management(contact Steve Anton,206 243-4050 X860) is recommended prior to the submittal of the formal land use application. The SEPA application will need to include elevations and details of the locations and proposed methods of screening for all outdoor storage or collections areas. Parking—The parking regulations require a specific number of off-street parking stalls based on the amount of square footage dedicated to certain uses. Because buildings are not proposed at this time, parking requirements cannot be determined. Access—Staff could not determine how access was going to be provided to the subject site as the proposed drive does not intersect with a public right-of-way. Please note,the driveways would need to comply with driveway width and location standards,such as: • Driveways shall not exceed forty percent(40%)of the street frontage; and, • The width of the driveway shall not exceed fifty feet (50') exclusive of the radii of the returns or taper section, the measurements being made parallel to the centerline of the street roadway. Environmental Comments: Based on the Existing Conditions plan submitted with this proposal, it appears there is a wetland located on the northwest portion of the subject site. A current wetland report and delineation would be required as part of the formal submittal for this development proposal. • Staff could not analyze the potential impacts to the wetland at this time, as the development plans do not correspond with each other. In addition,the subject site appears to have sensitive/protected slopes located throughout the site and would need to be verified through a geotechnical report discussing slope ranges and proposed mitigation if necessary. Therefore, a geotechnical report would also be required at the time of formal project submittal. If it is determined that any work is proposed in/on a protected slope (40%or greater) then a critical areas variance would be required. Shoreline Regulations: It appears the project area is located more than 200 feet from the Duwamish/Green River,which would exempt this development from the City's Shoreline Regulations. However,this would need to be field verified and the distance would need to be noted on the SEPA checklist and submittal site plan. If it is determined that the subject proposal is located within 200 feet of the Green River or any other water body of statewide significance,then a Substantial Shoreline Development Permit would be required. Signage:. Only one freestanding business sign (pole; monument/ground, projecting or roof) is permitted per street frontage for each individual parcel. Each sign shall not exceed an area greater than one and one-half square feet for each lineal foot of property frontage that is occupied by the business. In no case shall the sign exceed a total of 300 square feet(150 square feet per face if a two • face sign). In addition to the permitted freestanding sign,wall signs with a copy area not exceeding 20%of the façade to which it is applied are also permitted. Permit Requirements:The project would be required to undergo Environmental (SEPA) Review as the proposal would grade over 500 cubic yards of material. The review process would be completed in an estimated time frame of 6 to 8 weeks once a complete application is accepted (assuming a shoreline development permit is not required). The application fee would be$1,000.00, plus$0.34 per - mailing label required for notification to all property owners within 300 feet of the site. Please refer to the attached application packages for a complete list of submittal requirements and processing timelines. • In addition to the required land use permits,separate building,construction and sign permits would be required. The review of these permits may occur concurrently with the review of the land use permits, but can not be issued prior to the completion of any required appeal periods. Fees: In addition to the applicable land use, building,construction and sign permit fees,the following mitigation fees will be required prior to the issuance of building permits: Pre01-081(just sepa in 1H zone parking-equipment storage).doc\ AnMarCo Property Pre-Application Meeting Page3of3 • • A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on$75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project; and • A Fire Mitigation Fee based on$0.52 per square foot of new construction. Redevelopment credits will be applied as appropriate. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees is attached for your review. cc: Jennifer Henning • Pre01-081(just sepa in IH zone parking-equipment storage).doc\ e /100 ISI Us 2mi wit Juy O MEMORANDUM ION DATE: �f-rQ - O TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, EDNSP, Project Planner FROM: Neil Watts, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: uK quOhlvl 1.,61- LOCATION: Tot Norm v( PA- 3U3 PREAPP NO. floc-E. a I - D A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for ri - , Thursday, Auopick " , in one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new City Hall). Ifithis meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the • applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. . Please submit your written comments to �so-Vt �1 o-taa.V/ at least two (2)days before the meeting. Thank you. I" v DEv cm(s REPTONI g/4/( pUG 0 6 20i RECEIVE, H:\Division.s\Develop.ser\Dev&Plan.ing\Template\Preapp2 Revised 9/00 UG V CLVf IVICIV I JCRV UI V IJIVIV WAIVER OF SUPIITTAL REQUIREMENTS)R LAND USE APPLICATIONS ulturuiricw ::iiii}iii:i:::i::ii:::iii:::::':f}i: :• •. •. ftiii:ii::::::::'::i:::�::::::`::iiiiiir:ri:::�ii::.E,�( yJ�ra■My 1(ry :'iii.:-ii} ":•i:•:i:•i};{i:.: i:;::ii:i::Ci'isiT%i4:iiij'i}:•X'ii'i':iji?.'iii:;iiti:iii:4::i::L:iiiiL:ii::isiiiii::S}i;'ii.:: ]/.- V•r{.:\W1.1�.�� I.+.i?ii:iii'.isisiTiii::ii:Y::iiiiii:•iii:iryiii:.�::1:•:•�::i::::i.i.':::::..... .. �•K......... ......... .. :i::::ii'i::i::iii::ri::iii:ii::•i':h'::.�MIi�. .R. ... ............... . ....................................................................................................:i:•::•:l•�0:4:iii'•::^:i4:;.};r ii::J:Li-{:5::i:•iTii'�.i:4i}:J:3:}iiiiX�-:iii?•ii:^?iY•:iiiivi::i%::i•i:�iii:iif?:?4:v::iv i:;iii:�i:'�::�.�+-'i::!�iiiiiii?i:ii:4:�::'•: Calculations,Survey, :::::_iii':i':i`•i.:'::,::t:�:'i:;iii:'��:iyyi"�•:::iSi::iiii:i:'r.�:::ii::i::isS:i::i}i::i:�'iiii .:::xitii::::::�<4i:ii::'�:i::iiiii'i:::ii:::::i:�.i::::ii ii}:ii:::C}i:;: • .i et :tiv?:isij::is FS>:l ii':•i:%i::isjt::.t.::ii::::::::>:::,::-:i:•:::?:::i':.i:::isi':::v':is::•:::::::•::::ii}iiii:4i}:::Ci i::iiifi:iii:::. Drainage Control Plan 2 ...........:.:: ........:....... ..........:::::.:............ Elevations,Architectural 3 AND 4 Existing Covenants(Recorded Copy)4 • Flood Plain Map, if applicable4 Geotechnical Report 2 AND 3 :.ttia'.:> Grading Plan, Detailed 2 iir :. i i::>aiss '..::Istf.. t...........g ....... .....:.............:...................... ..............................................................................................................::.:.::.:::: Landscaping Plan, Conceptual 4 • ?iiF,'/?:•:�;:j:;::i:i iiiiiti:iiF?:iiii:r.'ii:'J:?iiii:iiii:�i:�i:.:i?:i�iiii�'i�?i i�'Tiijri:iii:is •iv:3i}}v._.::::.y.:::{i:•r•::••.•:_::::{{:i:n�w.i'.ii'.;•.i•:y.ii:i:tiW.i'i.i"::::.i'::::::;.::::::.i":::{::::::::.i'::.::n:.f:::.iv. t10 �.�:i:in'�:i�:vi:;ij�i+;i.is}.:};:;(?i::?vijivi':: •'�.-':i�}i::isi�%:ii:ii'�iiiiii'�'�iiii::i::.'-:{::::iviii?i:i;:!:C .......................... List of Surrounding Property Owners 4 Malilu .Lubefsfor r.{..0 ...:. ::fa....:....:...:.. .......:....:. ..:::.:...:.:.::.::.::..:..: ::...>:.:::::..:..::::.::::::...::.:..:::.::.:::.:::::::::.:.::::.�.:._:.:::.::..:::::>:.:.:....�.:.�.:::._:::::::::::..:.... Map of Existing Site Conditions 4 is ti�::f• ii:1;:i::}:�•ii:'?;.`:y<v:;:%;'i,:i::::}::ti'i'-?:r'jii':::.':ii:.:iii;i:::i::i;:i ti:'i':il::}:;i�;..::S:.iAiii:i:}.:'+::::?':�:::�?'' : •!:i.iii.i!:ji:Jiiii:::5:'::'i:•:':•':•i::.ii:riiiri'iii:•iii::':•:•i:•i:•i:•F^ii:•iii:'i:•v:?:G:'::-•i:::i.• ::...:..:.::: Monument Cards(one per monument), g>ttl:tiouel' gamw:LariM �••i:�`•�•=�Anaii; 4'K>:: �� =< :<>��<: :�;.: Plan Reductions (PMTs)4 I reapplication Meeting Summary 4 al::€tetter: :z >:>'::<:>:;:>:::::::Y:><::::>:::: :f::::i>;>::: :<:>:?:?::::::<::>:<:>:>:.<<::<:`' :::;::: >:::<:#':::>:»>:z:<:<::«':<•'::#:i:>:::#:>:::>>:::=:s::z::::>::><:>::>:: ;<;>::::::><:::>':.;:;?: ;:;><;::>:;<:;::: :>>><::::<;>::>:<:::: Rehabilitation Plan 4 This requirement may be waived by: T c • 1:. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: L��f� u&1c,� JJV(3 L.° 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 11 3. Building Section DATE: g/7" /E.7 4. Development Planning Section h:\division.s\develop.sendev.plan.ing\walver.xls REVISED 5/17/00 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION _ WAIVER OF SUB'f -TTAL REQUIREMENTS 'IR LAND USE 1• APPLICATIONS , •:G::4iLvi�ii:•i::i!!!i\:,i}}!'%i:!:?iiii:•iiiii:ij :'r:;:::i'::ii:�ii};:i'vii}ii}i y�:ii';•:�i'iii:Tii}:-iTi :�::�iiiiTiiiit:}:i:iii?i::iii}ii:is}:<:i:.'�::iiii}:%:F:;ii:!:i:t�:�!iiiii::'r::i:}f)::i}:�i:•iiSi:-i::}}ii::i'r:`vir:i-}:::y::}}:!:}!is}}:}!}i:}:::v}..: .:....:..:::... :{::i::i}ii$::}:::t:it •{: .{ : :i ... . :•:..........v...�._...;::;•E:i:}::{:::iij::iii:::ii::l�:{::::.�::{::..;:.�:::::.:ii{ii::i::::::v!':ni':::::::r.{:n::if::i::i:::i�:i;:isiji::i::i::::ii:iii::i::v.}:::::•i:::isi:i::::ii:isisis i::ititii:i:i::i::::i::}:i::::�.:tiii:::i::i:::!:i:::i�::::i: M.��TR.�����.}�.�y' .'':� � ::j::�y`�'•r:}i:ii+:>}::::i::'ii::i{::: i:::y: '(yy �::::::i'::1-ii:: •: { .. �, i ii}j::iii::i�::::::'r:<i{ii::::::::::is�ii::::Yi:;$.}}:;.:j{.!i!::{-}%:;!isi.,,:ii::::ii':i::::ii::}:::::i::;v:::i;OiiY:!�:ijj:: i-i:;::i�:�.^•.'ii:i::i::::.i::Si::i:ii::;i:;{.!:.y..IE ..y��+..�.y+�.y.is; .:::.:::::.:}::...........................:...�j..::...: . ................ :.::::::::::::: .:::�:::::::::.: ::::.::t:::.-:::::::.:�:::.�:: :.�::::. Screening Detail 4 .......... 4., Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 :i::-i:.iis.iii::.::::::::.;:.i:-;:.:;::i.:{.!ii:.:_::<::;.ii::..!:;.:;.!:.}i::.ii:;;:.:. :.::}}:. .:.}................: :........: .i:;::.i.} ... . : . .:::......*:::: .................................... Traffic Study 2 .:.:;.i:-::!:.i::..:>f•!:.;:ss:;}i::s:<:;::s:<>:s;<:-:c:>:::::::»:>:::;:»:>;;::;<:::»:<:::::>:<z:<:;:i::>:s:;::<. >:;:}>::> ;::}:: ,t.i;:.::.:.:�}i}:.;i;: UrbanCenter•. w....._..�...�., ..�, w.... .., ...... . ...... ... ..,...: �.....,.......u �.�............�......�.......................... •. Design Overlay Di:.t:::t snctReport a III i>,.i:.}::.:!; ii,.;:.r.:{.iii:.ii}:.;:;•i!:.!!:tt;.::.}}!:.:.;}:.ii:.}:-:.ii::.};:.:;.;i:.:.i:.i:.i::.ist lar:,tip. ]ty�({f�y i �}l:JG1:i✓1 V::::iiii:;iiiiiiii:{-}ii:::{:''i:'r$'i}i:::iJ:T;i'?:is3'ii: >:'v�ii+! Yi:Ot t±:�f.'�i:�iii:�ii:�:?�:jii::ii::::+i:::}.i:}?i iiji:�i>::�iiii:.Jivii:i::i:+::}`,iii{::::isj;:::::::I�i:}:ri:•::ij;:;:;:::i:{ji:::4::ii}'}�i}}+'Y�ii:`.:i .........................:::::::.:::::n-::::n�:::.�. ::v:: ,:;htt{;.!}}i}}i!}::i-}i},}t.}:Gi:{4:;;;t;;;ii::ii:: Wetlands Delineation Map 4 • eU PJ •::.....:::...::: :: :::sii:i::::::::::ii i:=:::.:g::ii:t`- :::ti:::t .: % .:'::::: :�:.';:;:5:::::::::8:::::%i:::::::::• ::;i::::,:::':::�:::•:::::::,:..::::::::i:::::::::::::::: .....::.,..:..,..,.=t::::::::r Wetlands Study 4 •.:�.:t;.!!:;a:.i:{.ii:.ii:.i:.:.ii:::t.!:;.!:.!=:.}!!':.i:.:{{.}}:.:t;.i:.i:.:.ii:;;.i:;.:;.!i:;.i:.ii:,:;'.i::.:.::.�::::::::::.�:::.� ,::.::::.................................................... •,iiMM``vvii33µµhh ''AS:i'i:::?i:!:�v+::::::::`'^::i!'}:C?:?i!iJi'iRviii::i?$iiii:i�T:iv�iii:::i " i�:Iil:{it -:: Tv{:t;::}:i::i:::Y{::{is5r:::i:::isi::: ::i:}i::!i::iii::::::iiis':::}!•:%i}::i::: it;�:i:ii :i: :!!:{• _ ii::!.:!.i:.•:M;a:-:.::•:::is '�'•'��i!iiii'!ij{{ ii:':-Ti: ii': i:�i};:::i::�'�•?iti : :?:iiji::i>:{O i::ii'i:::i:i:�ii::Y::?::}i•:?:r:��i:�:ii::•iil:?}:•ii:ii:: f�:L::iiiiiti>i '::i:�::?:::::i':v::�:i:�ii'v :vi::i:CiY:�?'ii .,4......IiiiiiAPPTS. ...... ../y�.....;.....n.................... ..:::::::::,........: ::: . .v:: ;•!}:.:•.. . .:......,•..::..:...........:........::::.:::.::{::::.�v:::.:.gin.....:v:::::._:......::-:..v.....v......•;..... : .::. ........... . .......•n::.vv..::,::.-::..........:::::.�:.�::n......w:......:.�:........................... nw::::::: .� ::v.: ::::..::.:::::::}•:}}i}}:a::;•.-'r:;! '!'-iii:i:;;.;{:i;{: ....}:: .};a:':i'!N!}:•!}}:!:;vi}:{i:.::::: ::::!:}:}i:;;v:;v;!}}:n�i:6}}!}i':: :::::::. .......................�... ......... ....I I.......... :.i3v..:t:Q i it3f:.: i aq P .Iw WOI . ::Sites*: tl`fterfit.Or�l�"'��'�� j r.. }ilia: _ __ _ n•';(aj';'•:;;:�3 >:'i,..::.::4}:'ti:ii::Y:i::i::i::isiii:}:ii::.:W.::::: iiry :iKiism:}:i:::i:{::i:K::}}4i:i:::ii:::::::::.:.yi}i}:'.iii!}}i:i4}!.}'r-i:;ai'!}i!iis4::.:}}v.::.-::::-.:-:.,..v.:..:.......:::.-:f*K::..v.?:iig.:-..:(:: '::-i-?' ?y.M. �ltl� .�tFF:: }�� yty ���'iti0� : �:};yy!}!}:xy}.:;iii iii}i iiii::ii:-i: �ii:iii:4 i:}v;i i::<:ii:;:yii'vii iii:ii}ii:-i:-iifiiiii::i:�iii:i::::is s:'i ::::::?::::ii?iiiiii:i.T::i�:�'iiii : ::::::::iiitiii�i}:r:::ii;:t,:!i:ii:ii::i ?3 {.,. : .ii ;}::,;.;,..;::::::. ...................... .......�.::. .::::::::::.:::::.� ,.:: : .�::•;:-i:-i:.ii:.:�:;.ii:-i:-i:.;>:;.>:;{.i:-;iii:.i:}:.i;:.;:-;i:.!:.:;;ii:i;:!:;:ii:i:i::i .......... . ::. :.......... ........................................... ::::>3':><:::::::>::>::Altin:><§igi:ii::>:t:ii:::::::::::: ilili::iiiim::iiiiii::>::: ii•>i::::iii::;.}>:.iii:.:.i:{,::.i:.i:.i::::.:!:a::;.s::: This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: Stoneway Truck Parking Lot 2. Public Works Plan Review Section • 3. Building Section DATE: 8/22/01 4. Development Planning Section • • h:\divislon.sldevelop.serldev.plan.inglwaiver.xls REVISED 5/17/00 CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION PLAN Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area 501 Monster Road SW, Renton January 25,2002 A. Proposed construction dates(beginning and ending dates): Site construction is anticipated to occur during the spring and/or summer of 2002. B. Anticipated hours of construction related operations: The hours of construction related activities would be from 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. Monday through Friday and 9:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. on Saturday. C. What are the proposed hauling/transportation routes: Only about 900 cubic yards of material are anticipated to be exported. Likely export routes are depicted on the attached map. D. Measures to be implemented to minimize dust, traffic and transportation impacts, mud, noise and other noxious characteristics: Watering of the site during dry portions of the construction period will limit the quantity of dust particulates created by workers' vehicles and heavy machinery. No substantial impacts on traffic and transportation are anticipated by the planned construction. Mud being transported off the site during construction will be minimized by placing rock at the entrance to the development site during construction. Noise associated with the construction will be temporary and not out of keeping with the Heavy Industrial area. E. Any specialty hours proposed for construction or hauling (Le., weekends, late nights): See B, above. (However, trucks may sometimes leave from and return to the completed site on weekends or during late nights.) F. Preliminary Traffic Control Plan: Construction vehicles will initially enter the site. through the Black River Waste Reduction Center site. Once a temporary construction entrance is installed where the paved entrance is proposed, that entrance will primarily be used as a construction entrance. Page 1 of 1 LEGEND: INGRESS (ENTERING) I _.. 6 EGRESS (EXITING) E lr -Cod` MgRti �� RIPPERCENTDI DISTRIBUTION (X%) �� �'0,9< �� N zcip. AND DIRECTION ti� P /fiA/G 2F�P �1 m ice I tlY ��94, *��1 \16 ��✓ APPROXIMATELY 50 TRUCKS/DAY 111 139TH "9GF, �� o (50 TRIPS OUT & 50 TRIPS BACK) .,, ti� SITE ��� o W SUNSET s�-J� �E ti� of� BLACK RIVER 77 y ? '�- ,� u, RIPARIAN FOREST • ti B (90%) 143RD ST �) E SF R.R. 143Rp PL \1111 MONSTER RD SW rl VI\ 1. .I (90%) I SW 7TH ST v ��� %sl 147TH PL �>\�� �Q- ocn Lu a (70%) i (nu., n ' S 149TH \ %. ¢ �� # 0 0 10TH ST 70% ST SW SW 12TH SS 151 ST ST - ``LEA /.---- , \Ii. \ \i. 16TH SW ST S 153RDc NW SO Ali..."41k.#1.°111: N NV �� to.....A Lu ,��� - 0 W '' = J G r `� r - WILE: PROJECTED TRAFFIC - DISTRIBUTION _ FOR: TRUCK PARKING/STORAGE AREA FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE - RENTON, WASHINGTON File: P:\SDSKPROJ\3555\exhibit\3555-X1.dwg Date/Time: 01/25/2002 14:06 Scale: 1=10 jhopper Xrefs: • January 24, 2002 Stoneway Concrete c " 9125 — 10th Avenue South JAN ` C Seattle, Washington 98108 W�2 Attn: Gary Merlino `�```�` ` RE: The Proposed Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area at 501 Monster Road, Renton, Washington EVALUATION OF WHETHER ANY OF THE SITE WORK ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSAL WILL LIE WITHIN THE BUFFER OF THE OFF-SITE WETLAND LYING TO THE NORTHWEST OF THE PROJECT SITE Dear Mr. Merlino: • I was asked to evaluate whether or not the proposed site work for the proposed Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area development will lie within the buffer of the off-site wetland lying to the northwest of the northernmost portion of the subject site. The portion of the subject site in question (see the attached copy of the site plan of the north. . portion of the subject site, Figure 2) involves a proposed. enlargement of the site's existing storm water detention and water quality ponds. The only activity proposed at this portion of the project site is regrading of the banks of the existing ponds, as is illustrated by the existing and proposed contours set forth on Figure 2. I visited the site and the wetland to the northeast on October 9, 2001, to see the situation first hand in order to perform my evaluation of the question. Findings Your proposed development activities lie entirely within the Renton • city limits, while the subject wetland to the northeast of the northernmost end of your site lies within Tukwila's city limits. A report by Parametrix, Inc. dated May, 1991 shows a wetland at the north end of a map that is contained therein. (A copy of that map has been attached to this letter report as Figure 3.) This is the same wetland that is referenced to the north of the project site as 3303 43rd St. NW, P.O.Box 1337, Gig Harbor WA 98335 USA 253.858.7055 Fax 253.858.2534 ba@harbornet.com Stoneway Concrete January 24, 2002 Page 2 "wetlands" on the attached Figure 2 site plan. Because of (1) the prior evaluation of this wetland and (2) the limited purpose of my investigation, a further formal delineation of the wetland is unnecessary. The section of the above-mentioned Parametrix, Inc. report entitled "wetland determination/classification" (see pages 8 and 9 of that report, Attachment 1), characterizes the subject wetland as: 1. Not containing rare or endangered plants or animals. 2. Having no open bodies.of water. 3. Containing only two USFWF vegetation classes. 4. Having no forested wetland class. 5. The wetland is less than one acre in size. At the time of the Parametrix report, the wetland was presumed to lie within King County. Parametrix concluded that (a) the wetland met the King County criteria for a Category III wetland and (b) a 25-foot buffer was thus required. Parametrix apparently was not aware that the subject wetland was within the Tukwila City limits rather than in unincorporated King County. (See Figure 2 for a depiction of the City limits in the immediate area.) Note that Section 18.45.020C of the Tukwila Municipal Code defines Tukwila's wetland types. (See Attachment 2.) Based on the Tukwila Municipal Code criteria and the description of the wetland per the Parametrix, Inc. report, the subject wetland would be considered a Type 3 wetland in the City of Tukwila. Per Section 18.45.040C, a 25-foot buffer is required for Type 3 wetlands in the City of Tukwila. Renton Municipal Code Section 4-32-3:D2 provides the Wetland Classification System for the City of Renton. The subject wetland does not meet the criteria for either very high quality Category wetlands or lower quality Category III wetlands. Based on Renton's Code provisions and the wetland description in the Parametrix, Inc. report, the wetland would meet the criteria for a City of Renton high quality Category II wetland. The City of Renton requires a 50-foot buffer for Category II wetlands. • t - Stoneway Concrete January 24, 2002 Page 3 During my site visit I found no wetlands lying within 50 feet of the existing gravel driveway (see Figure 2) that straddles the north end of the north boundary of the project site. The gravel driveway lies north and west of the proposed pond regrading activities. The entire area within 50 feet of the northwesterly edge of the gravel drive is at a higher elevation than any existing wetland further to the north. There are clearly no wetlands lying within 50 feet of the gravel drive. Because (a) there are no wetlands lying within 50 feet of the gravel drive and (b) the largest buffer arguably applicable to the subject wetland' would be Renton's 50-foot buffer, there are no wetlands having a buffer that would extend as far to the southeast as the existing gravel drive, let alone the area of the nearest activity of your proposed project (i.e., the pond regrading that is proposed at the north end of your project site). Summary In summary, the site was investigated using the City of Tukwila Code, the City of Renton Code and the 1991 report by Parametrix, Inc. The Parametrix, Inc. report identified a wetland off-site to the northwest of the proposed development activities. The largest arguably-applicable buffer for the subject wetland would be 50 feet pursuant to the City of Renton code provision. Because the subject wetland lies more than 50 feet from the proposed activity, the proposed activity lies entirely outside of the subject wetland's buffer. If additional information is needed or if you have any questions, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, A.J. Bredberg Attachments Tukwila's 25-foot buffer may actually apply instead of Renton's 50-foot buffer but the question is irrelevant in regard to the Stoneway proposal since no work is proposed within 50 feet of the wetland. sa To ti\ c b9� MgR7.N 1 CDTyFR ?' /17NG �'�j� GREEN /'oqo Wq Y �G� ,,s SITE r RIVERz. Now MONSTER ROAD SWKDA AVE. E ON 4 114"1 1 FIGURE 1 : VICINITY MAP MERLINO CONSTRUCTION B 8c A, INC. GIG HARBOR, WA 98335 (BA #3534) CO0 I I 7 Z i r sp. -n t% Z 1 A iit 4100, 1 m r ,0042 Z 33 II 's 13 j I i O I C) i Q \ S .�34• L 4.390 F w :4p'CiD \ mot• •� \\\ cn \AI --.. 1 % \ Q ���L1111���, N. ,�4 EX. GRAVEL \ ¶ *' / ACCESS DRIVE / N . 'lQ j t��' � 1\I, � Gam.,,, 4 , El e' �. S f : :1l,p�llt 1 t� 1• F •■ ■ EXISTING I911 It i 1,`‘, 1`, ,';r,k '‘ `a BIO—SWALE �' .1 I II i �I\I \ 1 ?1ll{i�\ r` \i'• I DETENTION `, I 1 POND \ 1 I :1 #'#{� 1 �1�1111 O ' ' r 3/it i t{t1i \ ; 1\11111 i Z FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN xi MERLINO CONSTRUCTION o B & A, INC. v GIG HARBOR, WA 98335 (BA #3534) • I FIGURE 3 : WETLAND MAP, PARAMETRICS, INC. r�� MERLINO CONSTRUCTION y ;` ' N B & A, INC. \•• GIG HARBOR, WA 98335 (BA #3534) �• _= N. . WETLANO1 a -...,`�" 3EAC n C.7qL L_ ~111. A • A -.= \ `�C 0. 0 ,3G. 4 ` . • H �• SEDpIV+1TATlON \ •� 4, �!'IN // BA StN • <c+..... if/ // //:.:;:i.•;;;;•:•.... \ \ 9° :,'.' ' \4+ \\\ rI .' :sty: V.P t�N4 \ ••,-4-,-•;-•-•;-••-,--•;••••.•.•.,•••••,•• \ei\'‘,,,,...\\ 9� • �9C q • • \14 \ J 90 \ r i 1 • t: •°i:: per. laJ '; SCALE INFEET ••t :c' , Figure 2 , 1 , ,,m, _, o .s :so Site and Wetland Map � mc, • '4 r1H._l 111.I•T -111=I.I r1 I .. . • -. . .... Attachment 1- Parametrics Inc. Information • • C r 3/1) surface layer over a dark brown (10YR 3/3) to dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) or olive brown (2.5Y 4/4) subsoil layer. Within the Beausite series inclusions of an inorganic hydric soil occur. Soil surveys are generalized and within mapping units inclusions of other soil types often occur. The hydric soil has a dark brown (10YR 4/3) to dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) surface layer with very pale brows (10YR 7/4) and brownish yellow (10YR 6/8) mottles. The subsoil is a dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2) sticky clay with dark reddish brown (5YR 3/4) and dark greenish gray (5BG 4/1) mottles. These soils are found in.the wetland and in the man- made impoundment Hydrologic Characterization Typically,wetland hydrology occurs where the presence of water has an overriding influence on vegetation and soils, resulting in the'development of wetland soils and wetland plant cornmtznities. Sites with wetland hydrology are periodically inundated or saturated during at least part of the growing season. Wetland hydrology normally exists where topography directs water into Iow relief areas having soils with poor drainage characteristics. Inundation or soil saturation are direct indicators of wetland hydrology. Where saturation is absent, hydric soil morphology can be used to imply wetland hydrology. In artificially drained soils, these conditions must be carefully interpreted because hydric soil indicators may persist for many years after drainage has eliminated wetland conditions. Likewise in artificially saturated soils,hydric soil morphology will not develop if the water is continually moving or oxygenated, or does not persist for long periods of time. We observed saturated soils in the natural wetland. In the natural wetland the soil was saturated within 10 inches of the soil surface. A culvert beneath the railroad tracks connects the wetland to the river. Wetland Determination and Classification The wetland boundaries (See figure 1) were delineated primarily based on the presence of hydric soil morphology and soil hydrology. Vegetation was used as a secondary indicator. The wetland was classified using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife classification system (Cowardin, et al. 1979). The wetland has two zones of vegetation,' each with its own wetland classification; palustrine scrub/shrub (PSS) and palustrine emergent (PEM). Based on applicable and appropriate King County wetlands classification criteria, the wetland meets the criteria for a Class 3 wetland. Based on observations by Parametrix, Inc. : (1) at the site no rare or endangered plants or animals were observed; (2) no open body of water was observed; (3) only two USFWS vegetation classes were present; (4) no forested 8 wetland classes were present; (5) the wet4n4Ficgoiess than one acre in size. King County requires a 25 foot undisturbed buffer of.nay='vegetation around all class 3 wetlands. Stormwater management and fill with mitigation tin'occur in class 3 wetlands. The sedimentation is exempt from King County regulation because it is a man-made stormwater management facility. The sedimentation basin.is.also exempt from U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regulation because 1) it.is-a maw-made structure constructed for storm water management and 2) it was constructed in upland soils. Aerial photographs of the area showed that the sedimentation basin was installed prior to 1970. REFERENCES Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Goblet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. FWS/OBS-79/31, 103p- Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation. 1989. Federal manual for identifying and del t."ating jurisdictional wetlands. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C. Cooperative terhnical publication. 107p. Hitchcock, C. L, and A. Cronquist. 1976. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA. 730p. King County. 1990. Draft Sensitive Areas Ordinance. King County Council. Seattle, Washington. 110p. MunselL 1975. Mansell soil color charts. Kollmorgen Corporation. Baltimore, Maryland. Reed, R. B. 1987. Wetland plants of the State of Washington - 1987 (as applied by the Seattle District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). U.S.D.I., Fish and Wildlife Service WELUT - 86/W 1?47. Snyder, D.E., P.S. Gale, and R.E. Pringle. 1973. Soil survey, King County area, Washington. U.S.D.A., Soil Conservation Service, Washington, Aaricuitural Experimental Station. 100 pp. U.S.D.A., Soil Conservation Service. 1989. Hydric soils in King County area, Washington. U.S.D.A., Soil Conservation Service. 10 pp. provided information on wetland soils. U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service. 1987. Hydric soils of the United States. 93p. 9 Attachment 2 — Tukwila Code TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE . Chapter 18.45 18.45.020 Sensitive area designation — rating SENSITIVE AREAS OVERLAY methodologies — classifications and applicability. A. Applicability—This chapter applies to any u • se Sections: or development proposed on any legal lot of record, 18.45.010 Purpose. any portion of which is a sensitive area or a sensitive 18.45.020 Sensitive area designation, rating area buffer as defined in the Definitions chapter of this methodologies, classifications and title, and specifically including one or more of the applicability. following and their buffers: 18.45.030 Interpretation. 1. Abandoned coal mines; 18.45.04 Sensitive area buffers. 2. Areas of potential geologic instability: Class 18.45.060 Procedures. 2, 3, 4 and seismic instability areas (as defined in the 18.45.080 Uses and standards. Definitions chapter of this title and TMC 18.45.020E1; 18.45.090 Sensitive areas tracts. 3. Wetlands; 18.45.115 Exceptions. 4. Watercourses; 18.45.120 Variances. 5. Areas that contain archaeological remnants 18.45.125 Appeals.. of value to the archaeological research community, 18.45.130 Recording required. which includes but is not limited to colleges, 18.45.135 Assurance device. universities or sodeties of professional archaeoiotsts. 18.45.140 Assessment relief. • or which is designated as important to save as a record • of the area's past by the State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation:' 18.45.010 Purpose. B. Sensitive Areas Maps and Irtverttories A. The purpose of the Sensitive Areas Overlay 1. The distribution of many sensitive areas in district is to establish special standards for the use and Tukwila is displayed on the Sensitive Areas Maps, development of lands based on the P' 1 tence of natural dated 1990, and on file with the Department of conditions thereon in order to protect environmentally Community Development (DCD). sensitive areas, including the natural character of 2. Studies, preliminary inventories and Tukwila's wooded hillsides. rating of potential sensitive areas are on file with the B. Standards are hereby established to meet the DCD in. the Sensitive Areas Notebook, dated May 1990. following goals of protecting environmentally sensitive 3. The maps and preliminary inventories and areas: - ratings are hereby adopted by reference. The actual 1. Minimize developmental impacts on the presence or absence of sensitive areas as defined by or natural functions and values of these areas. otherwise referred to in this chapter and as determined 2. Protect quantity and quality of water by the City will govern. The actual rating and buffers resources. for any sensitive area will be determined by the City 3. Minimize turbidity and pollution of using the methodologies and. procedures provided in wetlands and tiish-bearing waters and maintain wildlife this chanter for each type of sensitive area. habitat 4 All revisions, updates and reprinting of 4. Prevent erosion and the loss of slope and sensitive areas maps, inventories, ratings and buffers soil stability caused by the removal of trees, shrubs, shall conform to this chapter. and root systems of vegetative cover. C. Wetlands — For the purposes of this chapter, 5. Protect the public against avoidable losses, "wetlands" is defined in the Definitions chapter of this public emergency rescue and relief operations cost, and title. A wetland boundary is the line delineating the subsidy cost of public mitigation from landslide, outer edge of a wetland established by using the 1987 subsidence, erosion and flooding. manual in use on January 1, 1995 by the U.S. 6_ Protect the community's aesthete Environmental Protection Agency, and the U.S. Army resources and distinctive features of natural lands and Corps of Engineers. wooded hillsides. Wetland types and rating criteria are listed below: 7. Prevent unlawful disturbance of 1. Type 1 wetlands, those wetlands which archaeologic or geologic sites with historic or prehistoric meet any of the following criteria: cts• a. The presence of species listed by the 8. Balance the private rights of individual federal government or State as endangered or threat- property owners with the preservation of envi- ened, or the presence of critical or outstanding actual ronmentally sensitive areas. habitat for those species, 9. Prevent the loss of wetland and b. Having 40% to 60% permanent open watercourse function and acreage, and strive for a gain wacef in dispersed patches with two or more classes of over present conditions.: vegetation, - (Ord 1758 §1(parr), 1995) Page 18-70 Printed October 10, 1997 • TITLE 18 —ZONING ' • c Equal to or greater than five acres in (2) Vegetation diversity: Quantifies size and having three or more wetland classes, one of the elements of terrestrial habitat associated with the which may be substituted by permanent or open watercourse corridor. water; or (3) Corridor barrier function: Provides 2. Type 2 wetlands, those wetlands which some measure of effectiveness of the buffer to limit. meet any of the following criteria: intrusion and disturbance. a. Greater than one acre in size, (4) Surrounding land use: Evaluator,. b. Equal to or less than one acre in size oI the land use immediately outside the vegetated and having three or more wetland classes, corridor. c . Equal to or less than one acre, that E. Areas of Potential Geologic Instability — have a forested wetland class comprised of at least 20% Areas of potential geologic instability are defined in the coverage of total surface area, or Definitions chapter of this title, and are classified as d. The presence of heron rookeries or follows: raptor nesting trees, 1. Class 1 areas, where landslide potential is e. The presence of native plant- associa- low, and which slope is less than 20%; lions of infrequent occurrence; 2. Class 2 areas, where landslide potential is 3. Type 3 wetlands, those wetlands which moderate, which slope is between 20% and 40% and are equal to or less than one ace in size and that have which are underlain by relatively permeable soils; two,or fewer wetland classes. 3. Class 3 areas, where landslide pocendal is • For the purposes of this section, the U.S. Fish high, which include areas sloping between 20% and and Wildlife Service's "Classification of Wetlands and 40%, and which are underlain by relatively Deepwater Habitats of the United States FWS/OBS- impermeable soils or by bedrock, and which also 79/31" (Cowardin et al., 1979), contains the descrip- include all areas sloping more steeply than 40%; dons of wetland classes and subclasses. 4. Class 4 areas, where landslide potential is D. Watercourses—For the purposes of this chap- very high, which include sloping areas with mappable ter, "watercourses' is defined in the Definitions chapter zones of groundwater seepage, and which also include of this title. The City "Watercourse Study" (1990) existing mappable landslide deposits regardless of includes the methodology and criteria that will be used slope; for determining watercourse ratings. S. Areas of potential seismic instability, with Watercourse ratings are based on the existing soft soils, loose sand and a shallow groundwater table. habitat functions. Each segment or reach of a water- F. Sensitive Areas Special Studies course is raced individually. The rating system will 1. Required. An applicant for a development score a reach point total for each side of the water- proposal that includes sensitive areas shall submit course. Watercourse types, rating scores and rating those studies as required by the City to adequately criteria are described below. identify and evaluate the sensitive area and its buffers. 1. Watercourse Types and Rating Scores. 2. Waiver. If there is agreement between the a_ Type 1 watercourse, 21 to 33 points; Director and the applicant concerning the sensitive area b. Type 2 watercourse, 11 to 20 points; classification and type, the Director may waive the c. Type 3 watercourse, 3 to 10 points; requirement for sensitive area studies. There must be 2. Watercourse Rating Criteria. substantial evidence that the sensitive areas a. Instream Features. classification is correct, that there will be no detrimental (1) Width of watercourse: A measure impact to the sensitive areas or buffers, and that the of the average width of the channel at the ordinary goals, purposes, objectives and requirements of this ' high water mark. chapter will be followed. (2) Channel capacity: Quantifies the 3. Review of Studies. The DCD will review ability of the channel to convey high flows without the information submitted in the sensitive area studies flooding. to verify the information, confirm the nature and type (3) Channel stability: Measures the of the sensitive area, and ensure the study is .consistent stability of the channel by evaluating evidence of bank with this chapter. failure, scour, and downcutting. G. When this chapter.imposes greater restrictions (4) Fish use and fish habitat: or higher standards upon the development or use of Anadromous species and resident salmonid need pro- land than other laws, ordinances or restrictive tection measures if present. Rating depends on the covenants, the provisions of this chapter shall prevail. number of different types of habitat present. H.. All other relevant standards of this Code must • b. Corridor Quality. also be met. (1) Width of unmaintained vegetation: (Ord. 1758 §1(parr), 1995) A measure of the width of unmaintained vegetation from the ordinary high water mark. - TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE 18.45.030 Interpretation. d. Preserve the natural character of The provisions of this chapter shall be held to be wooded hillsides where they exist . :minimum requirements in their interpretation and B. Special Buffer Studies —Applicants for a use r application and shall be liberally construed to serve the or development on a legal lot of record within a sersi- •T purposes of this chapter. dye area maximum buffer shall be required to conduct (Ord. 1758 §l(part), 1995) a sensitive area study to provide a buffer analysis for the sensitive area. pis study may be waived by the .18.45.040 Sensitive area buffers. Director pursuant to TNIC 18.45.020F.2. A. GeneraL C. Ratings and Buffer Width — Ratings and 1. Any land alteration must be located out of appropriate buffers for wetlands and watercourses are the buffer areas as required by this section. Buffers in listed below. general are intended to: . 1. For wetlands: a. Minimize long-term impacts of Bevel- a. Type 1, 100-foot wide buffer; opment on properties containing sensitive areas; b. Type 2. 50-foot wide buffer; b., Protect sensitive areas from adverse c. Type 3, 25-foot-wide buffer. impacts during development; I. For watercourses, the buffer shall be as c. Preserve the edge of the sensitive area follows: for-its critical habitat value; and a. Type 1, 70-foot vide buffer; d. Prevent loading of potentially unstable b. T;v'pe 2, 35-foot-wide buffer; slope formations. c. Type 3, 15-foot-ride buffer; Land alteration is permitted for public 3. Setbacks. access, supplemental planting and approved land uses a. All commercial and industhal devel- as provided in TMC 18.45.080. opments shall be set back 15 feet and all residential An undisturbed sensitive area or buffer development shall be set back ten feet. This setback may substitute for the yard setback and landscape shall be measured from the foundation to the buffer's requirements of the Supplemental Development edge. _ Regulations chapter and the Landscape, Recreation, b. The Director may waive setback Recycling/Solid Waste Space Requirements chapter of requirements when a site plan demonstrates there this title. will be no impacts to the buffer zone.(See Figure 18-2.) C. 2. Wetland and watercourse buffers are 4. Variation of Standard or Creation of Variable intended to: - Width Wetland/Watercourse Buffers. a. Provide shading to maintain stable a. The Director may reduce the standard water temperatures and vegetative cover for additional wetland/watercourse buffers on a case-by-case bass, wildlife habitat; provided the buffer does not contain slopes 20% or b. . Provide input of organic debris, and greater. The approved buffer width shall not result in uptake of nun-tents; ' greater than a 50% reduction in width, and the reduced c. Provide an area to stabilize banks, to buffer stall not be less than 15 feet for wetlands and absorb overflow during high water events, and to ten feet for watercourses. Any buffer reduction • allow for slight variation of aquatic system boundaries proposal must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the over time due to hydrologic or climatic effects; Director that it will not result in direct or indirect, short- d. Reduce erosion and increased surface term or long-term adverse impacts to wetlands or water runoff; watercourses, and that. e. Reduce loss of or damage to property; (1) The buffer is vegetated and f Intercept fine sediments from surface includes an enhancement plan as may be required to water runoff and serve to minimize water quality improve the buffer function and value; or impacts; (2) If there is no significant vegetation g. Preserve the edge for its habitat value; in the buffer, a buffer may be reduced only if an and enhancement plan is provided. The plan must include h. Protect the sensitive area from human using a variety of native vegetation that- improves the and domestic animal disturbance. functional attributes of the buffer and provides addi- 3. Buffers for areas of potential geologic • clonal protection for the wetland or watercourse func- instability are intended to: dons and values. • a. Protect slope stability; b. Buffers for all types of wetlands.. and b. Provide erosion conaol and actenua- watercourses will be increased when they are deter- ton of precipitation surface water and stormwacer mined-to be particularly sensitive to disturbance or the runoff; proposed development will create unusually adverse c. Reduce loss of or damage to property; impacts. Any increase in the width of the buffer shall and be required only after completion of a wetland or wa- Papa 1 R-7 Printed nr,tr,har in 4997 Attachment 3 — Renton Code • 4 2-3 4-32-3 • should be determined pursuant to Section A final wetlands delineation is valid for two 4-32-3C. "Wetlands" which are defined in (2) years. Extensions for additional years can Section 4-32-3C but not shown on the Renton be approved by the Department Administra- Wetlands Inventory, are presumed to exist in tor if an application is proceeding in a timely the City and are also protected under all the manner through the permit process. provisions of this Chapter. D. Wetlands Classification System: The follow- C. Wetlands Definition and Determination of ing classification system is hereby adopted Regulatory Edge: (Ord. 4346, 3-9-92) for the purposes of regulating wetlands in the City. Wetlands buffer widths, replace- 1. Wetlands are those lands transitional ment ratios and avoidance criteria shall be between terrestrial and aquatic systems that based on the following rating system. are inundated or saturated by ground or surface water at a frequency and duration 1. Very High Quality Wetlands: Category 1 sufficient to support and, under normal cir- wetlands are wetlands greater than two cumstances, do support a prevalence of vege- thousand two hundred (2,200) square feet tation typically adapted for life in saturated which meet one or more of the following soil conditions. For the purpose of regulation, criteria: the exact location of the wetland edge shall be determined by the wetlands specialist a. The presence of species listed by Federal hired at the expense of the applicant through or State government as endangered or the performance of a field investigation using threatened, or the presence of essential habi- the procedures provided in the following tat for those species; manuals: b. Wetlands having forty percent (40%) to Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland sixty percent (60%) permanent open water Delineation, 1987, Federal Manual for Idea- (in dispersed patches or otherwise) with two tifying and Delineating Jurisdictional (2) or more vegetation classes; Wetlands. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. c. Wetlands equal to or greater than ten Fish and Wildlife Service,USDA Soil Conser- (10) acres in size and having three (3) or vation Service, Washington D.C. Cooperative more vegetation classes, one of which is open Technical Publication, 76 pages plus appen- water; dices. d. The presence of plant associations of Wetlands created or restored as 'a part of a infrequent occurrence; or at the geographic mitigation project are regulated wetlands. limits of their occurrence, or Wetlands intentionally created for purposes other than wetland mitigation, including, but e. Wetlands assigned the Unique/Out • - not limited to, stormwater management, standing #1 rating in the current King Coun- wastewater treatment or landscape ameni- ty Wetlands Inventory 1991 or as thereafter ties are not considered regulated wetlands. amended. (Ord. 4538, 6-26-95) 2. High Quality Wetlands: Category 2 2. Where the applicant has provided a delin- wetlands are wetlands greater than two eation of the wetland edge, the City shall thousand two hundred (2,200) square feet review and may render adjustments to the which meet one or more of the following • edge delineation. In the event the adjusted criteria: edge delineation is contested by the appli- cant, the City shall at the applicant's ex- a. Wetlands greater than two thousand two pense, obtain the services of an additional hundred (2,200) square feet that are not qualified wetlands specialist to review the Category 1 or 3 wetlands; original study and render a final delineation. 995 City of Renton • 4-32-3 4-32-3 b..Wetlands that have heron rookeries or c. All other wetlands not classified as Cat- 4110 rapter nesting trees, but are not Category 1 egory 1 or 2 such as smaller, high quality wetlands; wetlands. c.Wetlands of any size located at the head- E. Wetland Buffer Definition and Determine.- waters of a watercourse, but are not Catego- tion of Regulatory Edge: Buffers are desig- ry 1 wetlands; nated areas adjacent to a regulated wetland which protect the wetland from changes in d. Wetlands assigned• the Significant #2 the location of the wetland edge. Wetland rating in the current King County Wetlands buffers minimize the short and long term Inventory 1991 or as thereafter amended; impacts of development on properties adja- cent to wetlands, preserve important wildlife e. Wetlands having minimum existing habitat, allow for infiltration and water qual- evidence of human related physical alter- ity improvement, protect buildings, roads ation such as diking, ditching or channeliza- and other infrastructure as well as property tion. owners from flood damage in years of high precipitation. Wetland buffer zones shall be 3. Lower Quality Wetlands: Category 3 required of all proposed regulated activities wetlands are wetlands greater than five adjacent to regulated wetlands. Any wetland thousand (5,000) square feet which meet one created or restored as compensation for ap- or more of the following criteria: - proved wetland alterations shall include the standard buffer required for the class of the a. Wetlands that are severely disturbed. wetland being replaced. All buffers shall be Severely disturbed wetlands are wetlands measured from the wetland boundary as which meet the following criteria: surveyed in the field pursuant to the require- ments of Section 4-23-3C. (Ord. 4346, 3-9-92) (1)Are characterized by hydrologic isolation, human-related hydrologic F. Standard Buffer Zone Widths: The width of • alterations such as diking, ditching, the required wetland buffer zone shall be channelization and/or outlet modifica- _ determined according to the wetland catego- tion; and ry. The buffer zone required for all regulated wetlands is determined by the classification (2) Have soils alterations such as the of the wetland. presence of fill, soil removal and/or compaction of soils; and Wetland Category Standard Buffer (3) May have altered vegetation. 1) Category 1 100 feet (Very High Quality) b. Wetlands that are newly emerging. Newly emerging wetlands are: 2) Category 2 50 feet (High Quality) (1)Wetlands occurring on top of fill materials; and 3) Category 3 25 feet (Lower Quality) (2) Characterized by emergent vegeta- - disturbed tion, low plant species richness and - newly emerging used minimally by wildlife. These - other. wetlands are generally found in the (Ord. 4478, 10-24-94) areas such as the Green River Valley and Black River Drainage Basin. I 1294 • City of Renton '! C' ?AGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 70 CH AVENUE,#1800,SEATTLE,WA 98104 PLAT CERTIFICATE Order No.: 1014162 Certificate for Filing Proposed Plat: In the matter of the plat submitted for our approval,this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of KING County,Washington,and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County,and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in said KING County,to-wit: SEE SCHEDULE A(NEXT PAGE) VESTED IN: ANMARCO, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP EXCEPTIONS: SEE SCHEDULE B ATTACHED CHARGE: $200.00 JANe30, TAX: $17.6 0 �` J Records examined to OCTOBER 15, 2001 at 8 :0 0 AM By I / 4 DARYL SAVIDIS Title Officer (206) 628-5610 PLATCRTA/RDA/0999 'CAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY • PLAT CERTIFICATE • SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 1014162 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1 • PARCEL A: A TRACT OF LAND SITUATE IN LOTS 28A, 28B, 29, 30, 31 AND 33 OF JUNCTION ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE, KING COUNTY WASHINGTON, SAID TRACT BEING BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY THE NORTH LINE.OF SAID LOT 33, BOUNDED ON THE WEST AND SOUTHWEST BY A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL AND/OR CONCENTRIC WITH AND 50.0 FEET DISTANT EASTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES AND/OR RADIALLY, FROM THE CENTERLINE OF MAIN TRACT OF THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD.COMPANY, AS NOW CONSTRUCTED AND OPERATED, AND THE EASTERLY AND NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY AS NOW LOCATED, BOUNDED ON THE EAST BY THE WESTERLY LINE OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 24-23, 4-1 (ALSO KNOWN AS AS STEEL HILL-CHARLES MONSTER ROAD OR 68TH AVENUE SOUTH ) , AND BOUNDED ON THE NORTHEAST BY THE WESTERLY LINE OF BEACON COAL MINE ROAD; TOGETHER WITH ALL THOSE PORTIONS THE VACATED ROADWAYS ACROSS SAID LOTS 28B, 28A AND 33; EXCEPT PORTION OF LOT 33 LYING WITHIN THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; EXCEPT PORTION LYING NORTH OF' THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF THE UNNAMED VACATED STREET IN LOT 33; • AND EXCEPT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9408230332. ALL THOSE ''RTIONS OF TRACTS 31 AND 32 OF JUNCTION ADDITION TO CITY OF SEATTLE, ACC• ' 'ING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME •F PLATS, PAGE 75, RECORDS OF KING •:'UNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOW . BEGINNING AT THE POIN • INTERSECTION OF THE . ERLY LINE OF COUNTY ROAD NO. • 24-23-4-1, KNOWN AS THE S . L HILL-CHARLES 0". 'STER ROAD, AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN QUIT CLAIM DEED FROM OREGON '•'1 WASHINGTON RAILROAD COMPANY TO KING . CONTY, WASHINGTON, RECORDED UNDE' •,'DING NUMBER 2744543, WITH THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THAT PORTI••- •• •ID TRACT 32, HERETOFORE CONVEYED TO CHARLES MONSTER BY OREGON AND •SHINGTON LROAD COMPANY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 1753607; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY AL• SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LI . •F THAT PORTION OF. TRACT 32 HERETOFORE CONVEYED ' CHARLES MONSTER BY THE 0. & W. ' R. CO. , A DISTANCE OF 110 FEET, MORE OR SS TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID ' ACT 32, WHICH IS ALSO THE NORTHEASTE• LINE OF A PLATTED STREET (UNNAMED) IN SAID CTION ADDITION; THENCE SOUTH, TERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE PLATT TREET, TO THE SOUTHWEST - Y LINE OF STEEL HILL-CHARLES MONSTER ROAD; THENCE • .•THWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF STEEL HILL CHARL ' MONSTER ROAD . • THE POINT OF BEGINNING. • PLATCRTL/RDA/0999 E ; 1- 1 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY • • PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Order No.: 1014162 This certificate does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following exceptions: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: A. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters,if any,created,first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. C. Encroachments,overlaps,boundary line disputes,and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. D. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. E. Any lien,or right to lien,for contributions to employee benefit funds,or for state workers'compensation,or for services,labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,all as imposed by law,and not shown by the public records. F. Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. G. Any service,installation,connection,maintenance or construction charges for sewer,water,electricity or garbage removal. H. General taxes not now payable;matters relating to special assessments and special levies,if any,preceding or in the same becoming a lien. I. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations,Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. J. Water rights,claims,or title to water. K. THIS REPORT IS ISSUED AND ACCEPTED UPON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT.THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS($1000.00). PIATCRTB/RDA/0999 `CAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B • (Continued) Order No.: 1014162 EXCEPTIONS A 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: TOWN OF TUKWILA PURPOSE: WATER PIPELINE AREA AFFECTED: 15 FEET IN WIDTH OVER SAID PREMISES AND OTHER PROPERTY RECORDED: OCTOBER 29, 1930 RECORDING NUMBER: 2638928 j B 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE • PURPOSE: TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FOR SEWER LINE AREA AFFECTED: • PORTIONS OF LOTS 28A, 29, 30 AND 31 RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 24, 1986 RECORDING NUMBER: 8609241061 • C 3 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: DISCLOSED BY: TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF: MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE PURPOSE: SEWER LINE AFFECTS: 20 FOOT WIDE STRIP OVER SOUTHWESTERLY PORTION OF LOTS 28A, 29 AND 30 RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 24, 1986 RECORDING NUMBER: 8609241061 D 4. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: CITY OF RENTON PURPOSE: PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR ACCESS AND TO' ACCESS THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITHIN MITIGATION DOCUMENT UNDER STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT AREA AFFECTED: PORTION OF SAID PREMISES RECORDED: NOVEMBER 10, 1992 RECORDING NUMBER: 9211101119 E SAID EASEMENT IS A RE-RECORDING OF EASEMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9208240476. F 5. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: PCATCRTB1/RDA/0999 .CAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, - 1 PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1014162 GRANTEE: KING COUNTY PURPOSE: ACCESS FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF INSPECTION, MAINTENANCE, AND REPAIR OF THE DRAINAGE FACILITIES LOCATED WITHIN A PORTION OF THE ACCESS EASEMENT AREA IN CONFORMITY WITH KING COUNTY CODE SECTION 9.04.120 AREA AFFECTED: PORTION OF LOT 33 RECORDED: JUNE 23, 1993 • RECORDING NUMBER: 9306231869 G 6. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: CITY OF SEATTLE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PURPOSE: • UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES AREA AFFECTED: PORTIONS OF TRACTS 28A AND 29 RECORDED: AUGUST 20, 1993 RECORDING NUMBER: 9308200488 H 7. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: JAMES STEELE AND: COLUMBIA AND PUGET SOUND RAILROAD COMPANY RECORDED: MARCH 22, 1884 RECORDING NUMBER: 4649 REGARDING: RELOCATION OF ROAD 8. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: OREGON-WASHINGTON RAILROAD AND NAVIGATION COMPANY, OREGON AND WASHINGTON RAILROAD COMPANY AND: THE TOWN OF TUKWILA RECORDED: OCTOBER 29, 1930 RECORDING NUMBER: 2638934 REGARDING: LICENSE FOR PIPELINE J SAID AGREEMENT HAS BEEN MODIFIED BY AGREEMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 2638935. K 9. MINERAL RIGHTS CONTAINED IN DEED: FROM: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF UTAH PLATCRB2/RDA/0999 AGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE • •• SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1014162 • (SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO OREGON-WASHINGTON RAILROAD AND NAVIGATION COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF OREGON) RECORDED: NOVEMBER 8, 1989 RECORDING NUMBER: 8911081030 L THIS REPORT DOES NOT INCLUDE THE PRESENT OWNERSHIP OF SAID MINERAL RIGHTS. M 10. NUMEROUS UNRECORDED EASEMENT, LICENSES, PERMITS AND CONTRACTS DISCLOSED ON A "STATION MAP" FURNISHED TO THIS COMPANY BY UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, AS FOLLOWS: WATER PIPELINE RUNNING ALONG THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE EXISTING RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY. A STRIP OF LAND IDENTIFIED AS CE 1218 RUNNING NEAR THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OR SAID PREMISES WITH NO STATED USE. N 11. RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST OF BLACK RIVER QUARRY, INC. , PRESUMED FROM THE EXECUTION OF INSTRUMENT SET FORTH AT PARAGRAPH 2 . • 0 12. RIGHTS OF KING COUNTY AND/OR THE PUBLIC AND ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS TO ANY PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY CLAIMED BY THEM DUE TO THE DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE PRESENT LOCATION AND PRIOR LOCATIONS OF BEACON COLE MINE • ROAD, STEELE HILL ROAD AND CHARLES MONSTER ROAD (68TH AVENUE SOUTH) . P 13. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: 2001 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 377920-0160-05 LEVY CODE: • 2110 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 1,205, 900.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 552, 100.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ 21,144.34 PAID: $ 10,572.17 UNPAID: $ 10, 572.17 AFFECTS: PARCEL B AND PORTION OF PARCEL A Q 14. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER • PIATCRB2/RDA/0999 • Y ':AGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY • PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1014162 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: 2001 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 142304-9044-02 LEVY CODE: 2426 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 54,600.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 0.00 • GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ 673 .54 PAID: $ 336.77 UNPAID: $ 336.77 AFFECTS: REMAINDER PORTION OF PARCEL A WITHIN TAX LOT 44 AND OTHER PROPERTY R 15. LEASE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: LESSOR: ANMARCO, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP LESSEE: RABANCO REGIONAL LANDFILL COMPANY, ,AWC FOR A TERM OF: 12 YEARS RECORDED: AUGUST 3, 1993 RECORDING NUMBER: 9308031844 • S THE LESSEE'S INTEREST IS NOW HELD BY REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY, A JOINT VENTURE SAID LEASE HAS BEEN AMENDED BY LEASE AMENDMENTS 1 AND 2. T 16. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY, A WASHINGTON JOINT VENTURE TRUSTEE: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY BENEFICIARY: SEATTLE FIRST NATIONAL BANK AMOUNT: $ SEE INSTRUMENT DATED: JULY 28, 1993 RECORDED: AUGUST 03, 1993 RECORDING NUMBER: 9308031845 U AFFECTS: LEASEHOLD INTEREST OF REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY.' V 17. UNRECORDED EASEMENTS FOR UTILITY LINES WITH POLES RUNNING ALONG THE SOUTHERLY AND SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF BEACON COAL MINE ROAD, DISCLOSED BY OUR INSPECTION MADE AUGUST 3, 1993 . PLATCRB2/RDA/0999 AGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1014162 W 18. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT FOR ANMARCO, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP. X 19. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT OF REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY, A JOINT VENTURE. Y NOTE 1: A SURVEY HAS BEEN RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9012279006. Z NOTE 2 : THE QUIT CLAIM DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8911280666, SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9012279006 AND THE DESCRIPTION FOR TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER 377920-0160-05 INCORRECTLY REFERENCE TRACT 32 AS PART OF THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PARCEL A. NO PORTION OF PARCEL A INCLUDES TRACT 32. THE NORTH LINE OF BOTH TRACTS 32 AND 33 IS THE SAME AS THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF C.E. BROWNELL DONATION CLAIM NO. 41. AA NOTE 3: THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RCW 64.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: TRACTS 28A, 28B, 29 THROUGH 33, INCLUSIVE, JUNCTION ADDITION, VOLUME 12, OF PLATS, PAGE 75 AND SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST. END OF SCHEDULE B • PCATCRB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE ;URANCE COMPANY .., C) 701 FIFTH AVENUE, #1800,SEATTLE,WA 98104 PHONE: (206)628-5610 FAX: (206)628-9717 IMPORTANT:This is not a Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. /,it. .-eA d-�4i erg, .3a,.3/, , 33 C I S / �/�,• --7(3 ti e—7L 4-4760C ' --/7s . 7— -it,) sr•iA`ovk o-C Ta r Lo21 Ot, /4�33 elt - • T_-14 v .0f--e.....( Li 1,-4_4.15 .15 C �`' ,l 4t it 0 \\ \.~ • I� a� i 32 It r o .: b \\ •/ 33 ,,r F V4 �� 4.4.c, O u.rrw .Osrs .\ P8 \\ ,,# \ o N � , ,,� B C 8 > \\\ a,..� �ti q• u 4 4 \ i 4, i ;Ik. \ S� a a -r 1 . \\ \ \\ \ E „,,,, 3>?s f zo v .ruts .. v \ \ '\ Aft. \ � N\\ \+ '1\'0 Vr' 9 I INI ` I,o 0 • • !!' • \''',.. •'Pe. V, r , \ \ . Ii I \ o\ 'lb,.�\s28A aS . . t \\ %\.\‘\\.\\N.\\ . 4\*\:'%\\:%•,\,,,,,,, -. + N... "'">:.. ,,,..., v•,\ •, . . . ,,e,;,,,,,,, ‘\,, w 33..90 \\ L� \ • — y yna n.e.o �,..q > 'P \ . Jam` .. 13 I. IS 16 i,e. a� ! \, \\!/ �\ �ar..`Y+" O ,3 - 19 9• nR \ \ QA� 4� ♦ 6 "III"ir;.i..• .p • . , - 4, 1 \ liCk .,_ .,:,,,, , if 1 • xl 'Q, , y '{1. A. 26 -,,r»a f I ..s 1 : $ II ;V t1 . i \. 9 O\( \\ " ':r., . .000 MAP/RDA/0999 I I L ORIGINAL • After Recording Return to: • 101alinen & Associates 800 Bellevue Way N.E. #376 i Bellevue, Wa. 98004 749-12 i Attn: David Halinen 89/11i28 40666 D j RECD F 11.00 QUITCLAIM DEED RECFEEH�L 2.00 CPS *4:*13.00 55 i KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That, UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Utah ell corporation, (which through merger with the CO Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Company became LD successor in interest to the real property described mherein), Grantor, in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars • ($10.00), and other valuable consideration to it duly paid, i e4 the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby REMISE, RELEASE and forever conveys and QUITCLAIMS unto Cr) ANMARCO, a partnership in the State of Washington, Grantee, • whose address is 9125 Tenth Avenue South, Seattle, Washington 98108 and unto its successors and assigns forever, all of Grantor's right, title, interest, estate, g claim and demand, both at law and in equity, together with all after acquired title of the Grantor, of, in, and to the real estate consisting of 24.05 acres more or less, situated • 11 in King County, State of Washington, as more particularly I described in Exhibit A, hereto attached and hereby made a ett part hereof. This deed is made SUBJECT to the following: to (a) That certain Mineral Deed dated as of April 1, 1971, from Union Pacific Railroad Company to Union Pacific Land Resources Corporation wherein Union as Pacific Railroad Company conveyed all its right, 1 gi title and interest in and to all minerals and mineral rights of every kind and character now known to exist or hereafter discovered in and underlying the land described in Exhibit A hereto ICNacOI: attached, including, without limiting the EXCISETAXPAID generality of the foregoing, oil and gas and' rights thereto, together with the sole, exclusive NOV a 8 1989 and perpetual right to explore for, remove and E O 9 9 7 dispose of, said minerals by any means or methods C suitable to Union Pacific Land Resources Corporation, its successors and assigns, but without entering upon or using the surface of said land, and in such manner as not to damage the CEXC aoOuN - surface of said land or to interfere with the use ISETAXPAID` thereof by Union Pacific Railroad Company, its successors and assigns. V 281989 .09997 III G7 '— m npo_ o 1 T< r =: rn 6834i ..'<�y o} '.CC OO Ors • vxiT iI\ (Li A G • __ y • Ak (b) All taxes and all assessments levied upon or assessed against the premises described in Exhibit A for any period of time prior to and including the date of this deed shall be payable by the Grantor; all taxes and all assessments levied upon or assessed against the premises described in Exhibit A for any period of time after the date of this deed shall be payable by the Grantee; and the Grantee assumes and agrees to pay, or to reimburse the Grantor for, if paid by it, all such taxes and assessments for the period of time after the date of this deed. TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, subject to the aforesaid provisions, the property described in Exhibit A unto the said Grantee and unto its successors 40 CID and assigns. OD AND WHEREAS, Union Pacific Railroad Company did, on the first day of June, 1940, execute and deliver to The *4 Chase National Bank of the City of New York a certain v.4 mortgage deed wherein and whereby the Railroad Company conveyed to The Chase National Bank of the City of New York 4.110 as Trustee for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, among other things, the land described in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, The Chase National Bank of the City of New York was, on the 31st day of March, 1955, merged into the Bank of the Manhattan Company under the name of The Chase Manhattan Bank, and thereby The Chase Manhattan Bank became successor to The Chase National Bank of the City of New York as Trustee of such mortgage, and on September 23, 1965, The Chase Manhattan Bank was converted into The Chase Manhattan Bank (National Association) and its name changed thereto without affecting the continuity of its business or corporate existence. Such bank is hereinafter referred to as The Chase Manhattan Bank. NOW THEREFORE, Know All Men By These Presents, that THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, Trustee under the aforesaid mortgage deed, in consideration of the premises, does hereby REMISE, RELEASE and forever conveys and QUITCLAIMS, subject, however, to the provisions aforesaid, unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever, its entire right, title and interest as Trustee in and to the real estate described in Exhibit A, to be held by the Grantee free and exempt from all liens, encumbrances and charges of such mortgage deed of the first day of June, 1940. 2 6834i i 1 1 This deed is executed by the Trustee without covenant or warranty, express or implied, and without recourse against it in any event. The Recitals herein contained are made upon representation of the Grantor and the Trustee assumes no responsibility therefor. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor, UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, and THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, Trustee under mortgage deed dated June 1, 1940, each has caused this deed to he duly executed on its part as of the .9,1'1'' day of it'trtlh .. , 19/4•,. Attest: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, r •�•`•MeiStant, Se etary Executive Vice P dent-Operation \` .•.....i�: :ram ?n`t,(�eal) CC ,. `/ ,-;, �, i u PC`ll° �. rrl�t,t. ,�H, „ ,, ;.. . Attest THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK O Cr) (Natt////iion Asso iation), Trustee OD F ssistan a retary ce President (Seal) .. 3 6834i ) 1 STATE OF NEBRASKA) ) ss. COUNTY OF DOUGLAS) On this .?/-day of APf(AILIe , 1989, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Nebraska, duly commissioned and sworn, personnally appeared R. K. Davidson to me known to be the Executive Vice President , of the corporation that executed the (d foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be CO the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the ODuses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the CO seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. seal Witness my hand and official/hereto affixed the day and year first above written. / . i ) Notary Public in and or t e S ate lkwMlMalu of Nebraska, residing at I.�i i�Ill I /2 , My commission expires ' /99z Wd.aE,<a.fax A199t (Seal) . Ii 4 6834i t I 1 • STATE OF NEW YORK ) ss. COUNTY OF NEW YORK)On this /:7' day of OCr•6 . . , 1917,d before me, a Notary Public in and for. said County in the State aforesaid, personally appeared C. J. HEINZELMANN , to me personally known, • and to me personally known to be a Vice President of THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK (National Association), and to be the same person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and who, being by me duly sworn, did say that he/she is a Vice President of. The Chase Manhattan Bank (National Association); that the seal Cd C� affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said N corporation; and that said i:rstrument was signed and sealed on 1.4 behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of } al) Directors; and the said C.J. HEINZELMANN• acknowledged said instrument to be his/her free and voluntary act and deed, and the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, by it voluntarily executed, for the uses specified therein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal ggthe day and year last above written. My& mission expires /s < e—e67PpgeAr !/rl0 • ,pJERONIMO M.COLUCO Wry Mlle,State of Now York ��/�� No.41-0880257 \\\ Note Publid ••'•••( .a. Milled in Queens County fR4,1lf •. i: to Filed in NOW York County. .ion 990 Expires December 15, 1 J 5 . 6834i , .rrrwMrraflk _ `�� • LD.095 ik UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY BLACK RIVER JCT., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON EXHIBIT "A" • A tract of land situate in C. E. Brownell Donation Land Claim in Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 4 East of the Willamette Meridian in King County, Washington, said tract of land being bounded on the north by the north line of said C. E. Brownell Donation Land Claim, bounded on the south by the south • line of said C. E. Brownell Donation Land Claim, bounded on the ,D southwest by a line drawn parallel and/or concentric with and UP 50.0 feet distant northeasterly, measured at right angles and/or UP radially, from the centerline of the main track of the Union • Pacific Railroad Company, as now constructed and operated, and 00 bounded on the northeast, east, and southeast by the following N described courses and distances: r4 "Beginning at a point on the north dine of said C. E. 0) Brownell Donation Land Claim, that is N. 89 47' W. along said 00 north line, a distance of 30.3 feet from the most westerly corner of Tract 102 of Second Addition East Riverton Garden Tracts to King County, Washington; thence S. 37°49'12" E. 206.85 feet; thence S.•73°16' E. 185 feet; thence S. 50°50' E. 206 feet; thence S. 78°10' E. 171 feet; thence S. 42°08' E. 117 feet; thence S. 25°22' E. 194 feet; thence S. 18°44' W. 202 feet; thence S. 24°17' E. 257 feet; thence S. 03°05' W. 445 feet to a point on said south line of C. E. Brownell Donation Land Claim." Containing an area of 9.83 acres, more or less. Also, a tract of land situate in Lots 28A, 28B, 29, 30, 31, 32, and 33 of Junction Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, said tract being bounded on the north by the LD.095 north by the north line of said Lot 32, bounded on the west and southwest by a line drawn parallel and/or concentric with and 50.0 feet distant easterly, measured at right angles and/or radially, from the centerline of main track of the Union Pacific • Railroad Company, as now constructed and operated, and the easterly and northeasterly right-of-way line of the Burlington • Northern Railroad Company as now located, bounded on the east by the westerly line of County Road No. 24-23, 4-1 (also known as Steel Hill-Charles Monster Road or 68th Avenue South), and bounded on the northeast by the westerly line of Beacon Coal Mine Road; together with all those portions the vacated roadways • across said Lots 28B, 28A, 32, and 33. Containing an area of 13.55 acres, more or less. Also, all those parts of Tracts Thirty-one (31) and Thirty-two (32) of Junction Addition to Seattle, King County, Q, Washington, described as follows, to-wit: COBeginning at the point of intersection of the westerly C0 line of County Road No. 24-23, 4-1, known as the Steel Hill-Chas. m • Monster Road, as described in that certain quitclaim deed from t4 the Oregon and Washington Railroad Company. to King County, t4 Washington, dated September 15, 1932, with the southeasterly line. 0) • of that portion of said Tract Thirty-two (32), heretofore con- veyed to Charles Monster by Oregon and Washington Railroad Company by deed dated June 19, 1923; thence southwesterly along said southeasterly line of that portion of Tract Thirty-two (32) heretofore conveyed to Charles Monster by the 0. & W. R. R. Co., a distance of one hundred ten (110) feet, more or less, to the southwesterly line of said Tract Thirty-two (32) , which is also the northeasterly line of a platted street (unnamed) in said Junction Addition; thence southeasterly along said northeasterly line of the platted street, to said southwesterly line Steel Hill-Chas. Monster.Road; thence northwesterly along said southeasterly line of Steel Hill-Charles Monster Road to the point of beginning; containing an area of sixty-seven hundredths (0.67) of an acre, more or less. 4 Office of Contracts and Real Estate Omaha, Nebraska July 28, 1989 / '') ' ,-, . • to Viol-enc. B•iii chard:ton . . . (,( if j it) (Wee make, com his ititute and appoint Sp true and f• L/1 :4. IlWrti 1 atty for me and in r4r rim pl and stead t i G .iving and cranting •--- VORIt 302 elsoa' ' : , 2 wit J•lisalchardson 131 , .• . itlia Jun 25.23 14 Jatilichardsons bet 14444Heraner up ice 1111 rite et 8 ne ZO. 7,13-26 Oa ap 2107* let Ave City) . . ...... , A W . . '.; 4..1 :' r• • I Jut. 27-23 2410 175860? 4,- 4 Jim 44,23 $34e;g4, 01. irsx _ --- --,,• :,-,:-.- C:tegcn and Wathington Railroad Compatwo.:ean Oregon itOrp lui*ing • • ize off at the i of Portland, thin and licensed to dO blWin .. 8, , to Charles. ]Sonet or, of 1cow 1:p cy and wrr to fp the fdre sit in kaw ,. • J. pioss or parcel of ld cont 3.70 ao NO 'bolus all tilt , v . . , p3rtyi Of Tt 32 Jur ction Add kaw more paktic at; H IA • • ,__'-. I•etg ut the ne coy of ed Tt 32, tb, S 8,141/0101 if ale ' the AI In . . . ,, - Airct ad Tt a diet of 1134906 ft to fl. 'Cols:the "Ay. ln . of Gk. . ' road; th S 4412,101 E alg ud 1{17, 1n or-00 road a- diet Cork2242 ft; th 3 500115'53' E al% the nely ln,of sd.. 4o road a -difistlot j 2.34.09 ft; th 8 8( 01030" 3 alg ate nly in of ed Co _reeks diet . ) cif 31:5•49 ft th 11 69111 4 8133" la' a'.dist . 680.11 ft tO .the. _ O. GI! be Oregon and Washington Railroad compOly /..D.Varre110 its Pees v ono sl Attet C.B•( Q01tran, Sec . , • :11,,, _ ,: ': ,, 1:ctv ;run 19-23 - by ;'...1d•FarraLlt, eras of the corp ( of) her 14.01•Webh , . . .. nsp for ow 'OE at ti ne 'any 4-24 :,, - • , . . '.14.1 up R14540 Box 115 city) . , . - ,.. 0 , a i J4 Jim 27-23 2-30 1753608 P. t- , , . . _ - N. ci, ;fun -23 $300. .60 irax , li .k.Aikert end Itittle c.Aikene hit r , . .. . .,..... . 1,,..s . VI L,harlies 14013151;er \ 14 • . s• ,ip r r and i 41111 in*r tosp hie ha the fdld in kcw -‘ , „...- • - 4 - , , • . 15 In In 5 in Pia pint of Ysrlington, sc- to tho - ."100 • i '.. . - • " — 4..4 . i ...a S-4.24- - • 1 ,k.-'•+11 it ".1 kr 4••4...420- s,4 1.. ‘" ' . . '.r PI 1 .%!••I 1 .! 3 IP 1q.7 I. 0 engr • • •v ' : . ,•• s 411111.10.,.•• ;e„,---• ,-„,..- • k • '1 f • 7 _ 1 .•'• I : 1. . _ • 0 r i . • . ... ..: i. .. , i :•32 t.:;.1d• bl...-z,•arl. '‘e _..„.• ;/./- 2t . .. • I. :- -.; •..: ; !-- • ,., . --, (4..1111 -2,L. Iran n ', lrosill C ".a2unly scarp of the at or , . . .., i. L -, - . ,4-: b4,4,i;1 .4 tr.: :,r Visa .2 Oregon. . . t -,4, ,-..1.. nt'y 4 f•Ar..gv Ai 31111% ..,...' • . • ,A• - tl 2. '...e f,r !Lae 0.." tt. ;nib forever, ts B pletto -raad , : ValS 5 : 1 : fit in 0- 6 folp vs zlit ,.. . ..- II ttose rAzt rti or tte V..1,-EL, ag 210 litc•- ast4 4111,-.-, Aunittioir..-.add --. ,.... . r the t le tritia 50 rt 4.11 *matt KA. at apt 111 ta.. -the4saater i„.._- t t 1 1.-_--Chve trinatrcr res.4 10....,,„ sac- I-taksit vei . . ,. ..E-, erass ad Iota eAl Its,..ctazttlig .. - , . . ,..... - • ..... .... 411V.4.414,7 ass_ of .,.I•baz ..:,.. . c t.i-..‘ -:t of land el.-,il V.; C. .t.rr ie elibast4 - : tpa,- -- ' " '401**IttlitUlt des4 atilt Jaa iii-11'. ;' i :17-: .';;Iiikitriii'air .,-XCerlid , „--- . tt :_s-B -- ---,7-• ,;•- :.?.1-,:-,-- :-,-,4-_, - - -.,:- -;..... ..,..•-1,,...,,,,.. • , , . ..-..., • --% --• ,-. •--4-,, ,..;-_ , ,,..-.„4:,!Fk:,,. , 'r< ', ''''''.1:` ' •:-P • ..; P 3 d CeJ. ter 1.1.1....! of a= toteloChill-atait iblietar-4064 .11.4 s gtarrerP. , •,... •,...m,77: , ,.....%--„i.: •,.•-.-4i::_ . •;••• •:..,-.44, ..-,.v.:, ..• ...1-1-1 V L-Z.e4 oit t.)-ir:r mad acre sd „ —•tettalt14 .41gratitoir 414P; : ;:-.:-..:: cr•:°:.:- :, - - • .:,...„-- .-_,,,.. bE... 7,- at a c..,t e;u. the sw II of sid Zastelloiradd --• bal. ea-Off . • ::-.1--,.....: ':-. _:,...w..„. t.,c-1:.` tlbc...-.170 ,t• -orti to a4 of dila • The:441. re set is eye4 saloiy to the pant of a ptib rood or - ,:. --;.v. •4. . .-,. gi. - • A tis:. 7.ty; n-J. lir.,4r_i t ne lin ell, 110 10aittall" boa woad fel' that purp , , t '‘: ;-.1 -' dy eati.3.1 rtri-brt, t* A Prrafttar, Its akelat ova ...r.c. . . ,, .:%;.:.• . _ ::‘,41-, esr,o-.: tz-..d 'bi-:eh.'Aug t &U t Lifiaa4 C420F.Ahlty • <=-4 -\ .2- ..r., ,.... b:? Arthur A WAu-phy .pZIkif ,4,--•••,- .. . : . .1.1; ettevt 10 id ,.."-.-tse.2abet aoay ?? . -,.? ..:_•!. • - 9:.:.'.2 1a,- Art.t...4..... .. A 1 .,,.:ipfi:ty pros °fad carp •-..coriprom.•••, %, • ..t, , a r 'Wu flea t, t 8 4 s Moly 4 1f36 flilby eo stags , (\ , ...r'' , :.:i.' • t-4-4, .f.: ,L§ ---,c iiii .I.,i)4t2 r 2744544 ,7 :,,... .x...,:-.,:f.,;:. ..... . - ( , b - '/1 13 9....2-42 10 . ., ,J.'.:7 / - i-, ,:f.-z.s,t.:' • . • : .-::.-i tt:',ii:•v,,.- ' ,.,11:,zafr, er..1 wife, ttyt, 1. ..aiiirtfq;1 -, _A ,t1417::::-I ......• ....,-,:,,-.!,,,.,--• J- •-<,v, ,-, ,, y Sri `y _�, 2 -'5.F , tt44 ' • •, :: ,f1 ,31.1. Lag t c. : F:u t l roe d, & .t V i g®t i Ofl oap6 ¢: carp of Ore, St - ,:•'; . to Lk) ��r..:e,on : . .:'. i hty :it < lac, st :4 x * . r - �; a't1 A a.r q c i�a2 foru3e of t : pub 'oreVer1 as • pub :root end . 1:.: ;% <�i;. l n t : n tie roi* re ea t :_'-; �` 11 tt.. e 2 h- rto-► ; t. tts 50 f(:. O '-of , :2: ^'• ' „ , '' . • 6tot: x Ili . •-v. es� 4tJAS tr Tglad Va 5 _ 8 ,..4_,,,.,_,,,. .. � , ,ii lr!'+' + - - :�x �::: ., J��a�: 1 a i s d and l '.a f t3Y sit t' t -'ro t-_'$ : a , ', d i ,1 tee1 hill- :!:x:� Uov'ster .ros4 a strty4- d '= oref: 4. : F . • .. ..3 .'.:.dilq..le 8?I..t;1' E Jtt be! zu.ore ?tJ7 4. f; =:::....- - ". ut 8 p t on the no A3 ofed J tie =*&et :n " 4 : - •. . • . a e a, sc• b2 ad r e -� _ :, 5. • A, 1 R. . . io 1.a r t, d1st of g * t. e ms �3_ ': to ad c t ., . a d i. .:.„‘r ?L.-J. 2 t ; th sto � dre' ..R 3 -�t th on �. cure ao :to left, .•r4it a at Mato `, ' • `;.: ' ...; : _.•4• _ I-a ; h o 3 dog 261 t- et c diet et 17Z.? :f ::: - ;t di tba _e ;:11 .- _ ec i i., .op :: r 4 east w a dt t li*rt - f'4d : (4 • . • : ,. , 3 • t ';' ..t4 th 3 se oor o ' d sex! Ma . : � gate tbi - aplinntt ="' • in.. ,;0 .5 • e: ' oast a diet of :ft 7. a_: r '1 to a,..pt• o4::too , .., f�E_ ,)+ *.t 2: ..aD zdJ •tkoit add, die-t- ae.9. --tt►. fro* the •°' ;e; '.. .: • vr! 4t rt z 2 r,-_: when ,be t 13. no 3o .. !- ..` t'•-^ U :.°f, ' coif • a ~114Pi• s.. rT39 ge:St to rte :a or, � aIi': `=�7_-`. ,. !.fi. ,,`? c- a i • • '•- r 4. .-1--. . :ai• _,psv• •: •r.* war i%s a. rhrar _ gy �,-.e.f c. _ , ;r 1 � r{ 1 T - . .. . • . _ , y 1 _ • x • v^'` F `4'" .. 4-5 „-,: as ,,, •r' Z • • •i A• - 4 •¢ < sr:, 1 c,!.., Q �,,, "` j4., ` .► • - ,-.,„ „., ,,,,,,,,:,-„•41.:•••••,a,,,,,...,,,K--1......f. ..--•? "„'. . :•--- .•;*,,-• , , . . • , . . , . • - - . 1 ili...1;-:E.'. .,i-••••'-.:--i--, .,:.,•:-...-,,•',7,- , --•-..r-. •_ -- .-.- • " ' • • ',.:,,..,--I,t -•P-''' ‘ " ":...-,: _-_- ,• .: .„-..ko. -- A..-•- • !., -1 , . • i . $2z-1--;--:e•••• 1-4r'..— -.t. .!* i . - • . • . "s". • . '- 0'S 7Y•;.•t•,,s'-.----=..-.,,1"i'i'c'.--!.:,.:.:•4,Y,`„ --.-."_.4,:--:--4-,,,--,:,---,,.-.i1:,--7-.•-*-.1..•.-.---...--;-, --r_..--if't,.e.'„.._ •..- i , . • . - # - • 4 • . _ P ' . 0 : -7rf - - --. ; •: - .. . 4 . •• II ;.7...AVV`‘...;..4-1:.V.:'•;._:..-•`.;•.;-,....,...,:11 .• . --,,.4-••••-: • • . ! • • •. • - .. ."fv.;',...':'.• ''': '9'',,,0, :;;;;::-.,:.:.„";,‘,..„",..-, .;'L.'..... -‘,•' s ,„i.,...•,,:' ...• „_ -. -0• • - - . . . • • • . 1 ! : 4 • , • ' -' 1. .. ,. ;-,,,-.i...,-,.„-..,-- ..,7 - ••. all -, - *'- ...!., .7 - ! •- ge-v.'..,-,'-, ...----'- -.,,1,-- -'-'''..V.:.-ii7o,..': ,-r7 ';.,,;-,--•-,,fl.,-.4,-.,-..,/,-, : -,,,,, " 1,-• - r-i-`.4, ' '-'''' i.,.-c..;- ..z."-... ,-4-; -..,..3e.4 .' Air ‘• ;• ---.•-•• ' -•.': :'.''.•. ';;.:7., --t- --.----•`2,...:'!:%I.-'n-11-:-. --^"c"--7/1 -', '- - "- ,,-A,a-... S. - - ' .-- . , ,,- •-,& , :I -‘1•:"„''=,., ,••:-. --,:' ' '_ rs.- , ....)..S.":^- - .., --., • . .•-.',", . I ' , - '' i• - - " '-, :. - . -. -- ---:•-• ;,--- 1543-4-- ,''‘ .•, •,..• : ,- ' • ... .1r.2 -- . --e..--aar. t.'istil,net Oarkv 1 Irla 4 ii-- liartset _....... ...."-_ • ••••:_ . ..*Ce411,713i • , .._, - ,..... - e by 117arylv idlirtiri: Ties ?roe g ,p . - , . . ...„- d'..u.rs aczyt secy . ...- at -.) : n y P, - uf ny on •.ept 15 3132 bylleary ---- .... _,Z Clerk vise pres of et • .• :.,, • I - - ,-, A_- - ),r,-. - - t.,...zr ?rent 117 Tilley st p It.i.Ilies4o tertf 11 is MP. - ..i - ..-•• • .:.- ' •V " ..., :.... '".4,.r ;7,...,5 1.4741<.'3 fllt.--i Co engt / .1 4110.1111..• 47/ / . . . ' . • 4. • ---. /5 3 :3 ? 274411144, .... , ,i 19 .1232 ..., ,...."fr - . A - t 1132 ..,elo '''' P I and benetri Va .. -', ilzt-In ,!_ m t irolad compen7 actirg. et. the at- 0-f0,4;1 . . -..,..i .. ., ,..1, . . -.-.--::- -3-1 - i•-•" ;t l'.5 il•-4. .....••..E ..„,,, i ..•-••••4 •• '44 •. . . . .''' • Ilr i••1 :-. I Or buci lit.!•..1rtian.-i, Oregon ., ;4 • - . . , ....-.-• • __„, 7 to_Cot..nty of.t1r_z2 st oflaz ,..., .-,.... oy rel eat.; q ti to z', 112r use of thil Pals.-Axers,. or: os a pub road - ‘..›..-., ,-....... .., ,..,-i • t-- n •'4 y all : rt ir the folg re e'i-i ...., . ., ,. . .. . ..',11 to T-Ar-tal of tte 8-B, Zg 30 31, stati 32 Junction -add s .. • • }-.. ,- lei t,b ,t. le wi V. in 30 ft .,a each eltile cot e0d P1-1 to the'400•11ter -T • \.....,_). _ • . ! I .....f. tho-:::,- t.t.el. kal...--Chee tomez-er ritle4 ote -,Ativirlier,d an Ettlakel it ,. . . _,. 1-1.,--•. 7.4'.a:44 ,. c-,.-ass Ed %Is and ..4tfmelig- r.4c. pt- fi Vl°a{ flt6 :-11417 1144 Or--t -1z tht . i t o 4qad cy. .1t CrX leeOna - drkinngteZ iroec Cny deed to 19 -1•,-,,4. . ., t t 23*F3 .,--- - ' , • 4 -.>d ceLter Ilcv or zeteo1iv.1.11.4as Wouster Seed 8.4 surveyed •- -...•_,.._ .... t..,ii. , ,I •ti--:-.::ed it ..:.,..vr.7r end %A V cr0712.13 sd ttabeing saroptcly d ,f; .-_. i;•:".;;; 11A a s"; t- ,;IC. tonc ..i.1 of ail Junction sad — teal on es .. . .., •... _ .. ..ve. c. -rtg.;I to -an'..1 or des V • ,- .: ,.., -.. . ,...,,-......... ,..„: .0 -.,..; „,..--....4.-•. . • , '.- is c ..-bd .f.,.417 ,p ).7 f•.-17.-• the TrIrp o4-, ti pail road er ._ _ ) t' a. /S Str.j,4.L 12 h ti•234t 1. P1D M(s) i^7920OMi1 I Grantor. Amen A Washinuton GencraLPartncrshln • WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: STREET INTERSECTION: •, Office of the City Clerk Sit 41 P;�d. q,hl,•t•(afo s•, . Inuton Nnnit i] R, Renton Iknielp.t Building ■■���177 �j 1 ' �'��ti."' �� ` '. r. zoo Mitt*verve South AUG 1 1984 .� C Renton, tt 4f1115s 1 KING COUNTY V U 1219 I QUIT CLAIM D: D RECORDER 1 '. I (corporate Form e THE GRANTOR ANHARCO. a WaehinotQD aeneral partnership for and in :. consideration of $ 1.00 , conveys and quit claims to The City of Renton. A :I , i Municipal Corporation. the following described real estate, situated in the ; . County of King, State of Washington, together with all after acquired title .' • of the grantor(s) therein: :!:+ See Attached Exhibit "A" -3. a IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said corporation has caused this instrument to be ' 1 executed by its proper officers and its corporate seal to be.hereunto affixed 1 this .3 2 day of .,Q K e ,, 1994. i,% ANMARCO ;; cn ct CI Name• Ti \ Name Title Name Title f pT•rnof. Name TitleGO 1 . O 'STATE OF WASHINGTON ) 0) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) on this d day of .l vn,0 , 199 , before me personally appeared ' '3 QrAf'Iet' 1/10.4777i5 to me known o be the effirnox VP ifIIhr lWo ;`► of the :,: -;�;,;.: . that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and �hcknow .d,f d instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of ._ ,paid - ..•. 'i`e' , for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath • tbtated that he was authorized to execute said instrument IN WITNESS jEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official tt xseal the daX��.ttItllw �lcr,,first above written. :'1 .< r4.40. ARY : I N to Public n and for the � 's,`Pueflc :P.;' State of ington, residing al %.„71:41!. oeh:'o•�a at 4-.•-0 O ' ') doe' My Commission expires: 424:-Jrk' • • -gtk9Lk-0O4 2- . //,. -TZN. • n, r. `_lac - . 0�����1 63tl' 0,Nq'fN Ei39144i OS/23/1994 .OD .00 ��t_C /t (_/: \ aii"`iii 3 ) ) O __ 111 _-.: • 1 t - • Engineers AR)UIJt`flC7V Exhibit "A" Pfannm .t Surveyors e June 14, 1994 ' Revised July 1,1994 RoidAtiddlelon File No.21-90-032-01(1-03 33rd Ave.W. suite 301 + P.O.NA 6638 LyJ a'Pal Description for AnMarco 15-Foot Wide Richt-of-Way Strip Along 68th 93036-vooil 1vn t Avenue South S03G 063g • • Plume 206 775.3434 4 Mx 206 775.3439 !nn t� That portion of Lots 28A,28B,29,30,and 31 and of vacated platted road all in f { Junction Addition to the City of Seattle,according to the plat thereof recorded in t Volume 12 of Plats on Page 75,Records of King County,Washington.lying • ti within a strip of land 15.0 feet in width,lying adjacent to and southwesterly of t t the southwesterly right-of-way line of 68th Avenue South(Charles Monster Road)(Steel Hill Road)as said road is shown on Record of Survey filed in Book 77 of Surveys on Pages 220 through 220A-C,under Auditor's Recording Number 9012279006,records of said county;the northwesterly terminus of said • 15.0 foot snip is the southwesterly right-of-way line of Beacon Coal Mine Road; the southeasterly terminus of said 15.0 foot strip is a line drawn parallel and/or r concentric with and 50.0 feet distant easterly and northerly,measured at right angles and/or radially from the as-built main line tracks of the Burlington Northern Railroad as shown on said Record of Survey. C4 Situate in the SE 1/4 of Section 14,Township 23 North.Range 4 East,W.M.,and (+) the SW 1/4 of Section 13,Township 23 North,Range 4 East,W.M. 14 t'7 o li CV bjr\sv\anmarco.r(s CO (� QoO��►,STEy• P i *; may / // 0, %*Ilipat Of %. moo 11/11/f •- ., . 54-p01P . .,, o . , !:";:,..1 ..., ."........- i ...'.',".••• •-- . •.;.:;,••...: . - •-- ---- .' , -:,,..•• 1,..'!••*.;!:,,'•,:."':...! -,.--,.::::--• ..;:,.:-,:=,:.y '.,,,....,,,,......::::,:.•:,..,,.......:.-...,-.,.-z..,:::::-.-••: .-.......,...:...,...:-,-t- ,..3:,.._,.. :::,....::::.,_,.......,:;;•:!•-:;.:..:.-....,.......,.„...„4...,..:,...:..;.5!„-....-:-.,..i.:„....;,i.. •,::.:. / .,,,,,:•.,..,..1:.,-„,.....t,,.....,...,.: „ . , .. • .. .el.; ,.. ,;?' ' .,. . • ..... .!, .. i . ,. " . . : .. • ....... . -,' I ',-.. . . '....... ...: ..• ..,*; . .• ::: ,.?... • s. .. r , ..,. ....%:.... -.• +, .. ,. -- .:!.. •... .1, - . , . .,,, %. - ' ' - `. P.' , ' .• . ' -' .i. • . i ........: ...• v, ::, .,.. I .. . . . - .• .'.(.4.-‘ :.- - ., ^ or •,...: ..,.. • .. . : , : . ., • . . . , • . , ..„ • . ,•• ... . e, .. , ,„.:,. ,•.. .:. ..;•. , . . ....• • • .... ,..,,,.,•, ......,. . ..„.. , .. . ":„,...:.,,... . ,,..,. .„.., :-..-. „,, . , .. , . • . . . . ,..„,,,, . 4,f.,••• • ( n(-if ) . : , ...-.!.!,-.7.,t,...e: • •".4“:.-.7% •,.;',.?",..'• - 4r:::.- • 4 4 ritC1: p iii4 04 1, 47 i'' ...-411-ct 'VI 2 c:i I ;IC "T 1 .5441;"it 4(i$ '• C- 4g a 3J f',1 tvi Parj ,,, ,,,,,-.--,•,:- - .4!.,:-: . , ---.;:•„•,,::, ' It* • ;kyr .. j ei a U T 1 11 tl. a 1:0/4 U.C:s Ei44r7; 341 vcr r.I.,1 gi. c:er 01:: Aoi.41 Oilol ,r1, 4; :: . • -2--..-.-•,-..,:•,,.. p 1 :,_.tis.:spl:..)6,74 titepzeiDeT1,%,i6frf, (3 VI(41 I I tg j 0 01.1 I i .411,2 4 F... 4. pe.; 1..:i , efl . •!:......, / .K.44 %j - 0.9*t*tig 3 C I'S ; I: 4t ,;Cj %Web •,Vp 4 t4"1 2;,,,p if, It.* tt. . :t.pq ,,,,-. ,-;, , ,...:.,::::1.,,;:;. :-...0,,.1, ..;,.;. ,,, --.agl: jp lei votlT-tIT liti oloir at14 ss .: .I vtlo a sm 3- 44...,:-...,, i1 .;'::',.„,...,4:-4,,,,,,I;I:j;,‘..*:-_,,w, _,. , .it. "'' ...,'' .• . '.i.t.,, d;till t• " t".i'i3i,2,',,;•. , A Og .'f.'ti,)•'•4t t y ' 0 .- a9q1 aj . .._.e 1S- - •••0 rOt i ••••• ?',..,,,::.;...::•::,„'-•::,-,-'•,".,,,':,....-1.--.:„,,i,ii•m"rk1V:7A. (Its 5ft r'-.1', VI 0090. gul-0-.1-Ailr,,•;,: :-: ::.„.-:. -4:1 i xii;.,-'..f )/1 il 311 titilite4 4•(> ....5c.. • - : • - -•-- • • : ' i:'‘,0:.r4;?s•t:-7 ..4,4„...,... . . Ti .,itity:-..ipe,id ps ow, so ap i t.• ..x*t11. ' co 3 Ile; 4ttci or ' fv-g;,••• - -,,,,,,-i.:3.... - . Stilartgeg*P, ' airqt: !eilitiVq, Jc. tilibl atse•'.2 el : 'I l 'fi. u O'iaf4 tiO Oa U Vi •-:-1.,;;Ain . , :, 11 ..?_•••.;,.. . .A.\--1:K'•••-• • 4*44-41 X14,t(t? 0.4'.1-43.ria je AI,Tire a!:. 1 uwarj ) It 4,1 c,i 4uazrog ',4) t.tu, .. ... ...„:_-:,:i.„•,•• .., ••• ,.„, / . *,-, ,- ,....„ . - ,,,, • ..* :_.,,1;:,.., ,. • . ...,._ :=,-, :..,7%!ii;;i.,..- : . ; „ . ,.. •,.477,f,::.,,,• :, 1.1 rs totrla. : vl paa ,-4 :, ,....! '.., ft- ,,..;f-,-..;•••,- . i54041:':':.:.' •-:,.''.,:c•-1:111411 : ?. ."-:''..81,,-,iltlIt" ''Niri '-'igit %''' 162 ti ai U ort PiT, 1 JO 9 pu ki 1 PA:'3 It:-. U Dit-pt tit/441-0'a ( -' ( ;? , . •: i-• ,,,il,1,5 4;,i,:.:: lk..*:;',1. ',:.: . ,:'•. ,'...;::-•, :,: - ,,'-j. ',-Atilt, 411.',.$ .A4toskTazuT IvA.S.40 xte od Td u.P1,9 114-111; ..• - : "t..:':ls:::'..::':: t'sii...tiii4:ill l'!. ;: s4.0 ittgl-ld pO. rkiluVoleu I uti.Q P'-'14 '0cor4ioui ..4101:.::2.-..,-." ---..:4h4". aiii.:`-'11c1,•'..tri%nj . 4 ''..,4. la.1, to vr 7 1 tie ; ,,: 09 /u ply° 11401 il"0 11.. . . , ...,, ,...„. , • -...1".'Z-':;7:1',Ii;*''l E'iti:::;''•''. IC 1141d ill 140 iu Talu 1 atz ptiv itIT4rYT je (14nd 3';',1 .iij asp ass:'cliTt4 • •••• r''-•?.--117-',•-,:J,: spa ciEl..,;,, 91.4•%:itod*- 01 0 olut irl,*4u,st ol 14.1 fir laill 1.1U14 latrite,D *lc 00iipi: , ... •- • ,,,,..1„...,?„:-,::e ,„..t_i;,...-..,„:„.,-,•:-.: . -;.':-, , ,., :_:-,4 !,•,-..,•....... tions VI#TuT•el,e2T-.4%; r•pg; U , Cip :40 T Sort U I s'it poet! s I v i4 1,1Lpizt ton sB 0330 • .. _. . i,,,c;i-, ,••-.r,i:;;.:•,::::.;,•,•,:. ", 3.. --,,..../.i FP.,,;,i,• . A , --• ?•,:l.i.-:1-;',-.•:,.'.*an ..sq4 ..iter : ...,„,..,.., ...• A...4:4101-::::':.illit iiisititiciA • siut ;:.! ipcii. ate Td rE,4 tea Sue xoj 3 a p lat.r tit U%111 . T.'.4ji:';;S.',...', . * • .' -- :::1' .'.'. .1 ' %....4,• : '-- ' ' ' ' 43;4. -4."4-56.- • :' .• •./' • . ';- : ,:,• 31 . 7444 ..444ko is. J AO xi 4111 Ap Dorm 944; dv: ori: AD t w 0 I U trail 4 a; . :,....:-.•:.1-. ..-.:',.,i, ' .14,-,,,v5,,:,.,:.•• . ..'...-. ,..,....,..•.,...:• '.,. •:,i,,,,.. ,..'... . ...,1,... • . .-.. .., ,7'.7.2::'.icjCi,"•,,.: -'• 1-.',7,'-'::4:'i.',': ":, ..': : ' j!':::.';... ' tall'•:4., ' • atal oll pun &WO utto a 401TaN•fizt. 36 ,•,---i•vt......, . . :-..;• .,...-..--7_,,..,.., I .." • -• A''.11"'<'".:15.:• - r!".-.,!k'Z''•'"' •A- ';-'1. : . '.. . r, ,L-.1.• ' '-':-1:73..e.':ie•74): . . X . ., :e.„. ilAr,? 14444111001,soviirTncrt Duo arlstuft)llieis,:*cia: ,:0•;0Er.: con: ez luel VII 30auflagqiff;: ,,.-'4,,..01,-,.._-- , • •-•:-•!:,.5.0.;:„...i,,, .!:..;.-,•-,'., .. i :,, ..',1.:7-_-::;.• ,T51-.131e5,3 • .,. -.....4.,72,i3::' N' r" -. • .-,.:i , •:':.. ,..,,i..;_v,..A 4;.:'. ' • ; , 5 ':. c,..^..41 aremp•m 4 , v.., ;71? •• ' il F,-;:;1 1 4z, NiK. ...4 -0 k. r- - . U. Itirl 1 six n1 4 'i,;. 4,-To uai.--)1. g T, :rtv! y f. 41:'',..ti 11 •-- 4:;,.:,.,...,Ti . •-- :x 4 : k4',. ? tt za or 1 f t tufa. ini isl ; 1p:t , _ e 4a. �d town of :E�a:cw la to a r, i 1,;� provide a tear. .r t ptpe � s An e�9 aeaae t 15 ft wide oirer. ead. morass lend bet T! ti?- ;, 3.1i `. • . .Serto Coal Nines. Inc. rind ' ' to d i:o 2, the ate -w t of :f, :: the ad eetae:vat ika • opposite a $?t' on •tbe •brae line b3.ot:ef s digit :c.' . § ,..:: .L$'33 ft :s ar 1 f the ir'1ttex1 pt a al •_:$e base !Jac , , .•v. 4.;: 114at 4 1y ;.' t i ao t;:loo i to a M t on tie: !matt I na 1142 It .or-- .f r the :. :: ` H' `~ • .EnttinZ. Dt , nd E, .Lao Y . .* F;i it es . :e yet t 1� ft Aida vex• pail ;� a lac Lan-1. 4filk ,,i is t ` .road g , yi .' it a. tat: c .� + n e'L t o a'x 41 : the .so a t ;i of tbea . xL ..,.' „.�- ad a i;e ne o t I :' 0., ws t to a r.�t' on .thy 'wn:� i.t. d.i:Atc.f ;lea , ' t a71 _:. •: �° ��t 43T ]: �'T :�e� eitti poi t► eat . ;be 11i s „ F; d. ' : . ,gat T , , oily pit to appo, i to s pt ,.-3n the 4a ~+t tine 31O ft or. 1 f` av be _¢- . -rft.: 1Ln1 trial t: tnt; , :.:', ad 'T�:�wn o I.A'kvot 3. il1 � rosa 0;a 2 ,vide a t*..e o t z ..::. i 11 .X�; F�� ;,.. '� 011 the rt►•F ilit d'�a's ,-, • `.. ,y;W: +4ti'# The several + :��seakente re el i Inet in ,3c ition noun _ � 3 41 . ` . ,,i _. Alta 14 , 1,W r; P.3 �. a 4 e o a °�. a1. .. `, ' s :���� � 1:��'*Pn r�A , '{.t3�3, I� 4.��i' a f`�.t�^t,��T' �. �.?��:� tit .��' et ����:� ta aftcr ' ` o .. e*ter l s ins :gr•�l Iola .a i�oaa sd •alv4 ilea lards it .hml. :: ` E ` I• etersan rd tn� t t'sa k.�.n interftlre vt i th :. .he a ans•truoti'n t l igs on ;:„s_ - i do , . dtow4 wi111 , at i tsi is%u {, .em4tnse ,. reuse a Lana:. to be ': lhO s ft not t o interfere with suor onatZ of *n -$y.. • _ rL4. Ouse Monster i.' ;..: kelt Foy 3 L )Z5 by k•e:.3 r i a a •;ir ,nt3tkr, .-•:1 ,.-f.r,a 1 a.a 4onat24 bwf b of ,';.',.., '.1- :'`r.,rb: ' k,:trce[►�.: , it :.» .•;Tr" ! r • lit i Ili ra a .;E;'' 4 1 ) 0 ••H: ; . • " y �j + .j z- `� �'ld b S duff , :if ►n car , =tEe;+vt1d.3, v;n ;, .1451 at f.. ; Ot 1.K. .:1 :•.i' 6;s s 00t 2 132;) 1 v Jj E�. ::::: ' 1. • 5; • .a 11 ay 4/ '3 ii '!�e I. I •iQo&L.�f'�e�n PI i A 'F'3 1.:, fie t by !R!, LS h, .�„-•-{w. `e. .o Wi'l _ t0 1°; '' n rhel zw1 la, a n :70 ' :a r Alit , r' eat / ' ( T ' •lw:' f'p grant q !:l cy too ap its syen Tie : 9, , u r ;a * w oviir tta :: Oyes y .� �`,,�.,C'i ter �i:'R+ for +"{ :tit �;� �.#:' ,.�� a'�39 .'�r ,ariq., �F:� ��;<�' C.t�? i � �.-s►t� ;�►� �.� :2 . Z "'."`rl `r : .n i 1 =t , 07. ! "r i)'.n t t R --j<c '..7't:;F1 r c�.tuen 't r•!tE 'e „ 1. 'so r I CALlaL IQ°,,\ 00 j , (- ' King PO. Recoras 1).:i,=1,ri TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT The L'nd.rs igned Grantor, its successors and assigns (hereinafter together referred to as "Grantor") , for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and no/100 Dollars ($10. 00) and other valuable • considerations, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby convey and gran-t to the MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE, its successors and assigns (hereinafter together referred to uS "^IUNICIPIALITY") , a temporary construction easement over, across, along, in, upon and under the following describes property: That portion of Tracts 28A, 29, 30 and 31 , Junction Addition to the City of Seattle, according to the plat nthereof recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 75 , in C_ King County , Washington, located within the SE k of .ct Section 14 , Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W. M. , lying CQ Northeasterly of the Easterly margin of the Burlington CI Northern Railroad right-of-way, any? lying Southerly .O of a line which is 80 feet £'ortheasterly of and parallel c4 to the following described line: Commencing at a point on the East line of the said SE which is North 1 14 '43" East 83. 79 feet from the Southeast corner thereof, thence North 23°30' 00" West 1 .43 feet u= c.o.:a point on a curve from which the radial center beat soot:- 66°30' 00" West 572. 96 feet; thence Northwesterly •., r- along the arc of said curve concave to the Southwest _ 105.-00 feet; thence North 34°00' JO" West 147. 26 feet c to a point on a curve from which the radial center bears -` North 56°00' 00" East 572.96 feet; thence Northwesterly ,•� a_io g the arc of said curve concave to the Northeast '' 3 L0:t00 feet to a point designated as. Point "A"; thence z c 0.rth 23°00' 00" West 202 feet, more or less, to an inter- setion with the Northerly margin of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way, and the Point of Beginning; thence continuing North 23°00' 00" West 30 feet ;tore or less to a point which is 232. 35 feet from said designated point "a" ; thence North 53° 24 ' 03" West 162. 15 feet to a point on a curve from which the radial center bears North 36° 35' 57" East 318. 29 feet; thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve concave to the Northeast 95. 5E feet; thence North 36°1 1 ' 59" West 592. 36 feet; thence South 77°54 ' 00" Nest 30 feet, more or less, to tie `;aster.ly margin of the Burlington Northern Railroad right of way; . 3:ack River Quarry, Inc. ZTS-3G 6808 Eceth 1 a 0th y Easement N . G-1 0-r_;T Seattle, Washington yoi 4 RECC' F Oi'rn�, Q1 3 thence continuing South 77"54 ' G0" West 100 feet to the Westerly margin of said ript-of-way; + thence continuing South 77 54 ' 00" West 70- foet to the Easterly margin of the Northern Pacific Railroad right- of-way and the terminus of said centerline description; containing 77,350 square feet, more or less. Said easement being for the purpose of using the above-described area for all purposes including but not limited to the storage of pipe and material, excavating, filling, and access during construction and installation of a sewer line with all connec- tions, manholes and appurtenances thereto on the adjoining cr adjacent property, together with the right of ingress and egress from said property for the foregoing purposes. By accepting and recording this easement, MUNICIPALITY covenants as follows: 1 . MUNICIPALITY shall upon complet 'on of construction of any facilities described herein, remove all debris and restore the surface of the above described property as nearly as possible to the condition in which it exist:d at the date of this agreement. 2. MUNICIPALITY shall protect and and maintain the existinca sump pump drainage system, water well, pump house and waterlines U during its construction. If, as a result of the MUNICIPALITY' _ contruct ion. activities these facilities are damaged, the MUNICIPALITY shall replace said facilities. n▪ : 0" 3. MUNICIPALITY shall, if the above described property is disturbed by the maintenance, re.noval, repair or replacement of the facilities specified herein, restore the surface of the above-described property as nearly as possi;ale to the condition in which it existed at the commencement of said maintenance, removal, repair, or. replacement. 4. MUNICIPALITY shall protect and save harmless Grantor from any and all claims, demands, loss, damage, expense, and liability of every find and description including personal injury and for any damage to or loss or destruction of property whatsoever suffered by Grantor , its successors and assigns, or by any persons, firms or corporations , because cf t'r.e ton:ruction and/or maintenance of said facilities. 5. Payment for the temporary construction easment herein: granted shall be made at the rate of One Thousand Two Hundred: Eighty sine and No/100 DOLLARS ($1 , 289. 00) per month or fraction thereof that said temporary construction easement area 'is in actual use by MUNICIPALITY. the term "actual use" as used here; n shall be cor,.:trued to include only that per ion, fro,r, the start of construction of. said sewer line in the above-described temporary construction easement area unti i completion thereof, including reconstruction and restoration of improved areas. Black River Quarry, Inc. ElS-3D C 8 0? 50•;ti 140th ea .t1e, Washington 98176 6. MUNICIPALITY snail pay Grantor a sum of Thirty Seven Thousand Seven Hundred Sixty Five and no/100 Dollars ($37, 765 . 00) for 1.0, 000 tons of stockpiled rock located within the easement area. 7. MUNICIPALITY shall pay up to $200. 00 for expenses incurree by Grantor far the expert evaluation of this easement: under the terms of R.C.W. 8. 25. 020. Dated this 6 day of ram-- (- ✓ 1986. i v BLACK RIVER QUARRY, INC By ,k .`:�\- Jaynes T,. Ha<<TK, President C�J O • y 7R. Ir)is l:" ok, :!\ B < <k River Quarry , 3w3 South 140tk= 0,1 Wash; ,c. : 17 '; ./ 14 � d • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING On this co day of 4, , 19 before me: the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the gate of Washington , duly commissioned and sworn , personally appeared James I,. Hawk to me known to be the President of the :Mack River Quarry, Inc. , the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned and cn oath stated that he is authorized to e::ecute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said cc•rL=;ration. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed tne day and year in this certificate above written. / 0• • Notary Pkblic n and far ` 9 State of Washington, residing at c . .0 Egg c11 Cr* 0 Black River Quarry , Inc. I•''fS-3i) 6808 South 14 0t_h Eiasemr.';•* Seattle, Washington 98178 ti. 1 „.- [. �, �- _ T� 1 v. —._._ \C>> =re L ill Cr__.tU. lc:N_. MON>Tc __--- f� i. /____------- -_-. •-<---.,..:-.7 / ��-'yhi;3 ��� ( ) . F ,t: /:7----'—- -—l 1� e —.------'-.--- - \J •T• N13'30.00'W�-... / 1 { / �/ \ 1 I\`f /J�x �� ' /,�� Eels' K'��,y';^•' 9 I( { \ . .7 ;...i'..}?•-. 1' •. • . / 0 \C \'. \ ...--)\•) I ---,...,.-."..--.7 .7'r.--*'••'i' ,e;0, -,- Ne-ra,oe:w --) 1 caysrR4'cma 1 ,,- is•"• J :',0-4. /, -, , EASEMENT -.4 ' _.T--.1';-i I._• : '4. \ . .�. x r'w t. Q • N4:n'S N UNGtp• • 'f _ � —TEMPgPARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 1---PO'rE.TAubse'NT E4 5EMENT- M' �`��- TOTAL TEMI: CGN5TRUCTA7N E5M1 AREA'. »Jt- Sa•FT -• G Tee lot Number • 1 Easement Number ^_ r IfAI IICY14Q Munkspoiity of MamooBron Searle 0223 Permaeent Easement e•r.Ef-B U R S ENGINEERS `-'•I'•'..O' ' 5;�;i_� TemeorerT Earemaet ^ RENTON E►PIVENT IINANS/E11 SYETEM �' /d J- CLR' BLACK K/VEZ QUARRY CO. - '••4OY1504,— . .Pgrff5EP EASEMENT ET5-3D "'" 1 1 1901VZ6099 e MI vo TN Ett',ti1.TC'_n 3:_TliRN TO: I n k,,li.iotycrI Re-recording to include legal description Ro,t:•a t.Ihandptl Gads,; 1Ten tJIAverttSa6 . EASEMENT.- THIS EASEMENT is entered into this C9 day of August, 1992 by and between AnMarCo, itiL WasnittgEori 'eneral partnership ("AnMarCo"), Regional Disposal Company, Inc., a Washington corporation ("RDC"), and the City of Renton, Washington ("Grantee"). AnMarCo and RDC are referred to collectively herein as "Grantor". { v RECITALS . . w ' -- A. AnMarCo is the owner of that certain real property legally described on exhibit A (the "Property") attached hereto and c CD incorporated herein by this reference. B. RDC will be the owner of all improvements (the "Improvements") I :`. x t- N located on the Property pursuant to that certain Ground Lease i I tT` between AnMarCo and RDC dated August 1, 1991. � `. `' C. Grantee is the municipality which has land use and development a permitting authority with respect to the Property. Under its \ • ' -a,-: authority derived from the State Environmental Policy Act ("SEPA"), - W . Grantee issued a Mitigation Document (the "Document"), dated VI= f November 7, 1991, with regard to Grantor's proposed development of o I the Black River CDL Recycling and Transfer Station (the "Facility") se ut" , on the Property. Condition 46 of the Document requires Grantor to ... S provide to Grantee an easement which will allow Grantee to enter upon the Property and review the compliance of Grantor with certain bc provisions of the Document. This easement is intended to implement - the terms of that Condition 46. v,r Z.-I NOW, THEREFOR:, for and in consideration of the covenants z o. contained herein, the parties agree as follows: .y ' _- AGREEMENT • zi— t.'~ x o 1. Easement Grant. Grantor hereby grants to Grantee, its o�', successors and assigns, the right and easement of pedestrian and �,— vehicular access over, across and on a portion of the Property X in 8 ("Easement No. 1") described in 7jchibit 11, attached hereto and u.; incorporated herein by this reference. RDC hereby grants to A Grantee the right and easement to access the Improvements as ' t g described below ("Easement No. 2"). Easement No. 1 and Easement t. c. ,- No. 2 are referred to collectively herein as the "Easement". The y 14 purpose of the Easement shall be exclusively for the entry by 0 x • Grantee, or its designated agent or employee, to the Property in .. x the company of an employee or agent of Grantor, upon first providing Grantor with 24 hours advance notice, on a single day per `' S year during normal hours of Facility operation, commencing one year from the date of the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy by Grantee to Grantor with respect to the Facility. The right of ‘.L. entry granted herein to Grantee shall be for the limited purpose ArMarCo/NOC Easement 0 Pape 1 ,9� ,4: / P E S.. • 1 memo . • of reviewing the performance of the Facility regarding landscape maintenance, noise mitigation, litter control, street cleaning, air quality, wetlands, control of waste stream, hauling limitations and traffic mitigation (hereinafter "Monitoring Program"). The Monitoring Program shall continue in effect so long as the Facility remains open and in operation, provided that by mutual agreement of Grantor and Grantee certain elements of the Monitoring Program , may be terminated if no longer required. 2. Costs of Monitoring Program. All costs of the Monitoring 'u Program shall be borne exclusively by RDC. The annual fee to pay o- for the services provided by Grantee with regard to the monitoring iprogram shall be 150t of Grantee's total expenditure for the ,) Monitoring Program during the previous year. The total expenditure z by Grantee shall include, but shall not be limited to, code r- inspections, monitoring programs and physical activities such as z street sweeping. 3. Benefit of Easement. The Easement shall be for the W 'r exclusive benefit of Grantee and shall not be for the benefit of • -+1••• -- any other person, entity or party. v z in CD CD4. Binding Effect. This Easement shall be binding upon and 41 o — shall inure to the benefit of each of Grantor and Grantee and their r "W N respective heirs, executors administrators, legal representatives, = J. successors and assigns and, shall run with the title to the land w described herein so long as the Monitoring Program shall remain in o effect. In the event of termination of the Monitoring Program, u. H this Easement shall automatically terminate and be of no further effect without any further action being required by Grantor or o-e Grantee. • a v "V, 5. Non-Waiver. No delay or failure by any party hereto to �. m M , exercise any right under this Agreement and no partial or single x o exercise of that right shall constitute a waiver of that or any y4.§'' other right unlcss otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement. 0 c L., 6. Governing Law. This Easement shall be construed in �', accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of u.i. a` Washington. GRANTo • rCo Regioryal DiepCom any c. x 1 — I �^ACT Its �jf e2c( e O t. i N ; s ArilerCo/RDC Easement Pape 2 .r .. ) ) UMW • MI 1 ' • 1 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) 88. COUNTY OF RING ) r. On this day personally appeared before me /9 NI:-R bliss}11.A.Cy, to me known to be the 4-6TLu7' of AnMarCo described in o v the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to i be their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes ao therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to 2 execute the said instrument. 0 z ' GIVEN under my hand and official seal this Zo NO' day of o) Qv G-v Sr , 1992. s r 44 i' 4 oar '` _ Notary lic i and for the HOC State of Washington residing -. at ii6-K►-oN. )vasi W, O W= _ My commission expires: �o• Yr , N 14.1 d ►Nil id I- ES 4 ?, STATE OF WASHINGTON ) `^ ) se. .„�a COUNTY OF KING ) z Cr ~l (� Wr ; • On this day personally appeared before me ��0.c' en o:Loce.. =F' Yc to me known to be the c of Regional Disposal Company described in the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the 0v• said instrument to be their free and voluntary act and deed for the La- . uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they S w were authorized to execute the said instrument. • "1: ^ GIVEN under my hand and official seal this 2.) day of `ems-wl , 1992. r- = i 1'-- Public n and for the State of Washington residing • at . My commission expires: .• ArMarCo/ADC Eminent A. . 1 �. • • • III• MOM • 1 • • • •+tea • • • • EXHIBIT A • A tract of land situate in Lots 28A, 288 29, 30 33 of Junction Addition to the City of Seattle, ' 3 g 32, and Washington, said tract being bounded on the north Kin the north line of said Lot 32, 4 County,. _ �i a line drawn bounded on the west a the north by �' bystant easterly, parallel and/or concentric with and 50.0 southwest • �, measured at right angles and/or radially, feet �, the centerline of main track of the Union Pacific Railroad Company, as now constructed and o from ~cm right-of-way line of Aerated, and the easterly and northeasterly the Burlington Northern Railroad Company H• • now located, bounded on the east by the westerly line of Road No. 24-23, 4-1P Y County w ; Rod Avenue (also known as Steel Hill-Charles MonsteRoa ), and bounded on the northeast by the westerly ,� ! line of Beacon Coal Mine Road; together with all those m • vacated roadways across said Lots 288, 28A, 32, and 33. a ,• portions the _• • • Containing an area of 13.55 acres, more or less, -JW lA= W U• • .10 ' • N w W O 4 0 M I~i 2 J • F.Q 2 0ON CV us (gti • • • LI 2✓/ F ►4. n• l R. v1 1 N a 2 N I • ,- _, • _ , • III I • _ . ..• ;.71' -...,i.;;;', ,..' r z 1 : .4.•Jzz •••;.„..,...--....--:::•-••••Ci'n WO:---•• ••,-/... : ; . "•:':!;c1\%.-\r!;:.:.V.Vt.•"1%1.! . •.'c *1rib th1-"..."— Ca'''''l,,,p,........, .. .... I • Z• 010 .r. . , • 4,8.g.m f. :.:1V 0•I r31.•--.•---.•.--...-•''•-•-V\.-:"s•. '. • ' 'e i•`1 M1i i.k-"..a1P-.4C..1't1..1..'‘4 " "I. C Iii.•‘.\\••c•,••..r.4 w,•, .,..L...62 ,1, „ 74131 : . O lisl z *m 1 :;:,---1.Z1-i• •-•S 1 Li: - -..4•7.CIJ , "1*".' 1....:.... ...r.t1 • 1 .,?,0.P• I . .5,,,, ,,, ,irpriT •Ph..."... ... Al-- / i ,' , 1111Getlifit I . ....,,,•'..1...1. .".... er 0 e...--... . s. •''•'TM."'" i t•.....1.4 4.3,:......ititlii d.• " ' 7 7:.---gon• • , .., ki-----..--.."--. / •1 0 • t I I •• Ins. ' ••*'-, i ,..,_N‘'''.•• I ..---...—.• •rit./,- ..-----—r-'3"-••••.13.1110-...11 -.5•7:-—"IWO-:---5 i•--..;a: 1 -..„,..."...Z.:-""- ...worm d.Cr...f.s....•....r. . ". ,c4 ' 5 •1 c.-; I .„.. :-:. • .-..,....a, I : ...... \ -.. —•• 1 ti. b.: , • f -., ••1 \\ 0„,, Sr.>,‘.................„........ 14: "• .••••••..-- '. . I N -45 •°1-'• .........::: ......•\ \ ,,. 54, .. X 0• -.... 4. i ...•!:•41:11 11•••2 , ,rn• .....• 41••••••••IA , .. 4 I .•• .0 I • 12---" ...NNWA Af:,12....1 s'..1.4': Se\ CZ \ \N4.) . H• .44 t.t13 I-: 4 5.5 2 a . 13 "‘ 1 L, t.T. i ... IA= . :•••• I S' ::•.: (:)* / “ L a(...1 .... -....----.-.4-•••••••-•-•-. : •-• ( .1 0 •• .... .•••' • 1 - i gir 0 r .•• col „..- • .• 1 •••1...1 0 . , = ta i-- -- ==c1z= ..t, 111,111. R • . • 7. . 11 \•' ID .i .• . . u. N \ s, 1i: ,.. • , .._ tY% • COURSc -. - - "? •". -.-A ..... 7 ,__ . ••••••• 2.J • P...:s ,6 31 n j54,\ ., ... ••••," = ''';:. . • 00 4.). %"... 1C) ^ clitii‘i ••• 114 -•'•••• ?•10 • 1 • t '''..v.,. g 1 . t Na.1 :.........-ra - i---1-,\ N\ io 1,-= . • .•44.) -Z .. :0 \ . .••':! • 1 4.4 .. • 0 ta • 11 i 40 II 41 i 42 4-'\ x . „O.." ‘P•ji /1,, - • . . (-1 \ s.... • ig...i. /• I;. t • 0 t•• . ......3,41_ . .414 I . LAI•-• 4 -••• •-P-- \ ' 17r ., % • .! . ., • , i - L.1: . • iI rI i —/ i I I i . \- „, ti. 20B . • • ..• . "45d•I Obil$1 \ '19' % • \ / . 51.4A• ''. .11 .1. ‘1. . i •\ 4 " \ \ \ ..4,0:..",v 4.. • • • i 1 i„, . il. ai ••••,••••fr• • t r•••.; .11.1'.; * 1..Yr.:y.fi 'll ' \'..\'''S`S•• ‘ss.I..1. \.,............ ,/,/ . 2 •‘•;1•4 1.11\\•14:Z I a 1 11 g .. , 1•••• •• '`.,_ \.1,;••"11 • 5 ,•••''' . .. 1.• .. 4.1 1/11.e i 0.4 •••••..., 3 ,, 4.„------ ,...."- •., . ?• .9 II '•• • 1...i.'' ' 'I . \ ' '‘''''7:•F'....`."---. . ..,•:\\'') .. \--'--. , r. :-._:.' .414... \ 'K. i —.. .7, .. • - „, , .,, N.5 i.?.! N Fear;rgi,-. • ••• 'P.'I • • -••••••••-•0 ..2, :..%..,........ .4:i.:4i,•, , -,,--- I Tr ? , ( 2 ,‘ . --- . 4 .\ .,....,,. .'.•• e . 'PLAT MAP OP THE PREMISES" • EXHIBIT A i . o • to.r /;Clixl'ne-71 N 70: WT.':: .!.1 -i,-4V.:.:dr..x Z.,,`L'InteweSaab {ezI'uf1.V.7161.K ii EASEMENT THIS EASEMENT is entered into this pZd day of August, 1992 by and between AnMarCo, a Washington general partnership ("AnMarCo"), Regional Disposal Company, Inc., a Washington corporation ("RDC"), and the City of Renton, Washington ("Grantee") . AnMarCo and RDC are referred to collectively herein I ' i as "Grantor". RECITALS r 1 A. AnMarCo is the owner of that certain real property legally ?!: described on gxhibit A (the "Property") attached hereto and z • incorporated herein by this reference. Of • B. RDC will be the owner of all improvements (the "Improvements") LAlocated on the Property pursuant to that certain Ground Lease .. = • between AnMarCo and RDC dated August 1, 1991. o C. Grantee is the municipality which has land use and development . permitting authority with respect to the Property. Under its •. � 1 authority derived from the State Environmental Policy Act ("SEPA"), o 1� Grantee issued a Mitigation Document (the "Document"), dated November 7, 1991, with regard to Grantor's proposed development of .'I' C the Black River CDL Recycling and Transfer Station (the "Facility") •. V on the Property. Condition 46 of the Document requires Grantor to o I CV provide to Grantee an easement which will allow Grantee to enter •` , upon the Property and review the compliance of Grantor with certain w t i' CV provisions of the Document. This easement is intended to implement i N ;. C" the terms of that Condition 46. ., 1 NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants • . — I . contained herein, the parties agree as follows: AGREEMENT ' 1. Easement Grant. Grantor hereby grants to Grantee, its I . successors and assigns, the right and easement of pedestrian and ;ri vehicular access over, across and on a portion of the Property • ii A ("Easement No. 1") described in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. RDC hereby grants to ii * Grantee the right and easement to access the Improvements as described below ("Easement No. 2"). Easement No. 1 and Easement or if j' No. 2 are referred to collectively herein as the "Easement". The • purpose of the Easement shall be exclusively for the entry by Grantee, or its designated agent or employee, to the Property in • the company of an employee or agent of Grantor, upon first '6i providing Grantor with 24 hours advance notice, on a single day per ,; year during normal hours of Facility operation, commencing one year from the date of the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy y by Grantee to Grantor with respect to the Facility. The right of ) 1 entry granted herein to Grantee shall be for the limited purpose AnNarCo/ACC Easement 1 • Page 1 1 Y O , l i • , of reviewing the performance of the Facility regarding landscape I maintenance, noise mitigation, litter control, street cleaning, air quality, wetlands, control of waste stream, hauling limitations and traffic mitigation (hereinafter "Monitoring Program"). The Monitoring Program shall continue in effect so long as the Facility i; remains open and in operation, provided that by mutual agreement of Grantor and Grantee certain elements of the Monitoring Program • may be terminated if no longer required. 1 . 2. Costs of Monitoring Proaraj . All costs of the Monitoring ��.} Program shall be borne exclusively by RDC. The annual fee to pay for the services provided by Grantee with regard to the monitoring z program shall be 150% of Grantee's total expenditure for the al I; Monitoring Program during the previous year. The total expenditure o !f by Grantee shall include, but shall not be limited to, code • wl inspections, monitoring programs and physical activities such as � I street sweeping. r 014. 11 3. Denefit of Easement. The Easement shall be for the • �'=.. exclusive benefit of Grantee and shall not be for the benefit of 4; �„I any other person, entity or party. • o!'r 4. Finding Effect. This Easement shall be binding upon and zi shall inure to the benefit of each of Grantor and Grantee and their Q°. '' respective heirs, executors, administrators, legal representatives, i successors and assigns and shall run with the title to the land Lal,i described herein so long as the Monitoring Program shall remain in e ; effect. In the event of termination of the Monitoring Program, 401. this Easement shall automatically terminate and be of no further .effect without any further action being required by Grantor or .., 1 �D Grantee. . N NI' 5. Non-Waiver. No delay or failure by any party hereto to •► CD exercise any right under this Agreement and no partial or single • m exercise of that right shall constitute a waiver of that or any . • el CD other right unless otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement. N • �i S 6. Governina Law. This Easement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Washington. GRANTo • - Cow f $YgiorYalD�ispQsCom any " it I /�G'�C.7` Its tfz�S1 8 a-cD I I ArrlorCo/ADC Eo,anrnt 1 Page 2 . 0 , El ( • . 1 mal STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) • On this day personally appeared before me i9 u 1)-a Glrts}n a EK, to me known to be the / -EKY of AnMarCo described in the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes I Ij therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to • ''' execute the said instrument. z W GIVEN under my hand and official seal this .Zo )' day of o v C-v 51' , 1992. . W x r- ,: e Notary lic i and for the t- 1 State of Washington residing a I at R Sx I-"N. 1.b4,1 . .( al•I My commission expires: o'I i N. N� a !� STATE OF WASHINGTON ) `• ss. � i p COUNTY OF KING ) • • N (� ", CD On this day personal appeared before me `)JCAi'{'enN tC0.Z,Of Q` to me known to be the ycaci1a_± of Regional Disposal _ . Company described in the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the .,, said instrument to be their free and voluntary act and deed for the , . uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute the said instrument. ` fl * 7. • �: GIVEN under my hand and official seal this ZU day of . wU�C , 1992. {' 11 1. !' (7\:7T\JIcre1Arls. ..."--S?X&...9.,,A—_,....— , • Public in and for the n: I h State of Washington residing • ,) at c1,, My commission expires: ')c ~ II '1'2 •-•a.3 1. ArMarCo/RDC Easement f- Pape 3 r L - ..w v . 1 / • After recording return to: Gary Merlino Construction Co., Inc, 9125 - 10th Avenue aguth Seattle. Washington 98108 • Attn: Robert Hines DECLARATION OF COVENANT AND GRANT OF ACCESS EASEMENT • { • IN CONSIDERATION OF the approval by King County of a grading t permit for application No. C9003481 (AnMarCo's Steel Hill Road Grading Project) relating to real property located in unincorporated King County, Washington, legally described on Exhibit "A", attached (the "AnMarCo Parcel"), the undersigned owner covenants and agrees as follows: 1. AnMarCo, a Washington general partnership, hereby grants to King County an easement of access on, over, and across the CJ` below-described real property (the "Access Easement Area") for the • • Lp sole purpose of inspection, maintenance, and repair of the drainage CO facilities located within a portion of the Access Easement Area in • Cr) conformity with King County Code Section 9.04.120: Cr ) That portion of Lot 33 of Junction Addition to the City w of Seattle, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Cr") Volume 12 of Plats, King C7'� page 75, records of County, Washington, described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the West line of said • Lot 33 and the Northerly margin of the Burlington Northern Railroad (Pacific Coast Railroad), where a No. 4 Rebar with red plastic cap is shown to have been set on Sheet 2 of 4 of a record of Survey recorded in Volume 77 of Surveys at page 220 under Recording No. 9012279006, • records of King County, Washington; • THENCE South 244 22' 34" East along the Northerly line of Burlington Northern Railroad (Pacific Coast Railroad), a • distance of 376.41 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; , THENCE CONTINUING South 24° 22' 34" East along said • Northerly line of Burlington Northern Railroad, a distance of 165.00 feet; THENCE leaving said Northerly line of the railroad North - 80° 37' 26" East, 180.00 feet; • THENCE North 00° 37' 26" East, 40.00 feet; • • THENCE North 59° 22' 34" West, 184.56 feet; IN11 OAOFIUCOiIDSacIMONI 1DEPU c DECLARATION OF COVENANT Page 1 • ►: •. sum AMC°!CM Wd MCC f \ Md 900 EO 698i•E290£6 •- VC i\ _ _ 0 . i . ... �._--1 ' .. :['."" • . ..i'L_ 7$Ali'ii.vi'rd'4F:tL'rh�• ':e'i 1 • • THENCE North 10° 45' 10" East, 109.10 feet to an angle point in the Southwesterly line of Beacon Coal Mine Road, as shown on said plat of Junction Addition to the City of Seattle; THENCE North 48° 43' 09" West along said Southwesterly line, a distance of 23.22 feet; THENCE leaving said Southwesterly line South 10° 45' 10" • . West, 150.00 feet; THENCE North 79° 14' 50" West, 63.34 feet to the TRUE • POINT OF BEGINNING. (Attached hereto as Exhibit "B" is a drawing that depicts the Access Easement Area.) Because AnMarCo may wish to alter in the future the specific access route or path to the drainage facilities lying within the Access Easement Area, AnMarCo hereby retains the right to modify the legal description of the Access Easement Area I ' from time to time by giving written notice thereof to King County and recording any such alterations with the King County Recorder provided that (a) the altered legal description encompasses the • • C stormwater retention/detention facility and (b) a minimum 20-foot CO wide access strip to that facility is part of the altered legal — description. 2. If King County determines that maintenance or repair work ((ID is required to be done to the stormwater retention/detention ' M facility existing within the Access Easement Area, the director of co the Department of Public Works shall give the person to whom the permit was issued pursuant to K.C.C. 9.04.030, the owner of the property within which the drainage facility is located, the person responsible for maintenance of the facility, or other person or agent in control of said property notice of the specific maintenance and/or repair required. The director of the Department of Public Works shall set a reasonable time in which such work is to be completed by the titleholders who were given notice. If the above required maintenance and/or repair is not completed within the time set by the director, the county may perform the required maintenance and/or repair. Written notice will be sent to the • titleholders stating the county's intention to perform such • maintenance. Maintenance work will not commence until at least seven days after such notice is mailed. •• , 3. If at any time King County reasonably determines that any existing retention/detention system creates any of the conditions listed in K.C.C. 9.04.130 and herein incorporated by reference, the director may take measures specified therein. 4. The titleholders shall assume all responsibility for the - cost of any maintenance and for repairs to the retention/detention DECLARATION OF COVENANT . Page 2 s • • 1 • • . • f • facility. Such responsibility shall include reimbursement to the county within 30 days of the receipt of the invoice for any such work performed. Overdue payments will require payment of interest at the current legal rate for liquidated judgments. If legal . action ensues, any costs or fees incurred by the county will be • borne by the parties responsible for said reimbursements. 5. In the event that AnMarCo or any subsequent owner of the AnMarCo Parcel shall sell, transfer or otherwise terminate its ' , - interest as owner of said parcel, then, .from and after the . effective date of such sale, transfer or termination of interest, such owner shall be released and discharged from any and all ' obligations, responsibilities and liabilities under this instrument • I as to the parts so sold or transferred, except those damages or liabilities (if any) which have already accrued as of the date of such sale, transfer or termination of interest and any such transferee, by acceptance of the transfer of such interest shall • • thereupon become subject to the covenants contained herein. • j ' These covenants benefit King County, touch and concern the • land, and shall run with the land and be binding on AnMarCo and its heirs, successors and assigns. These covenants are intended to protect the value and desirability of the real property described f p�j above and to benefit King County. DATED this Y5 day of June, 1993. S AnMarCo, a Washington ' CO general partnership ••.!:'-' . By(` .) A Gar LJL Merlino, Partner • • t. DECLARATION OF COVENANT ,jjit j'i 1..EL. Page 3 t,A i �4.a t r, c r 3� .,. . f ) • • • • I • • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that GARY M. MERLINO is the person who appeared before me and acknowledged • that he signed the instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as a partner of AnMarCo, a Washington general partnership, to be the k free and voluntary act of such partnership for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. I Dated: 67! /qt); Sig at a MOM s E !1/111 A d///A LAdd ilA 4ir '' ° :•_. j Title KrA r�o• ,. (Y') My Appo�intm nt Expires -4,::!-' • MI .•i- _I., INV CT) :1 ;Ve 'K:,d-i ter r#t▪ jr `t,I y,ii'Lig x;Pli Kr,P'A a;- • • :i:c, �y kr r •' DECLARATION OF COVENANT• S''. ."• Page 4 }, 4:• r,:,: :5: iIy N ) • )- aowemr • . • • 1 , w EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE "ANMARCO PARCEL" That portion of the following described property lying within unincorporated Ring County, Washington as of June 11, 1993: A tract of land situate in Lots 28A, 285, 29, 30, 31, 32, and 33 of Junction Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, ' Washington, said tract being bounded on the north by the north line of said Lot 32, bounded on the west and southwest by a line drawn parallel and/or concentric with and 50.0 feet distant easterly, measured at right angles and/or radially, from the centerline of main track of the Union Pacific Railroad Company, as now constructed and operated, and the easterly and northeasterly right- of-way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad Company as now • located, bounded on the east by the westerly line of County Road No. 24-23, 4-1 (also known as Steel Hill-Charles Monster Road or 68th Avenue South), and bounded on the northeast by the westerly 1 line of Beacon Coal Mine Road; together with all those portions of the vacated railways across said Lots 2811, 28A, 32, end 33. i`--,4, •y Q Containing an area of 13.55 acres, more or less (the portion �"•`.q; CO in unincorporated Ring County contains an areas of approximately ; C— 2.02 acres). :, Cep •.-. CO ,. vP ti• .-. .. 4 •• DECLARATION OF COVENANT WO Page 5 ''' .. j . r _ - • II/ . ' f J A• . '5.1 ... . ' ....„,...--*----------- i11 -•;.- 50 x / • '1 4 C3• , 01 N 0°' .*53... X S 10.4510. W 150.00' • 0 2 c.ocr-' co iog.ic. _._ 1 0...1 Tom D . E ‘.." iksEttEktt- . cr, , ...• tick. A cr; * • IP V ai if 0.0) a . . ......,, o.. .., • .., . r . cn 4.) . ..... .. r • ;..2 ., . 4,...- • , xd . , . 40 .0° •. . N 2, . ...,°0—37—26 E tu • 4 .0 $ . • ., •.: ! • a . . . .. ' • EXHIBIT "B' .*.'•'•'::.,-;,". :::7 '..•:f:4 r:!`•:::q.'' 't 1 -:''.' .. , - .•..•• "'.. 'i'. .: . :-'' 1. ••• . i.' .••.' A ,• :1 ."1' ' •••.•-•!ii:4qt,fi:tgC:-.1-4464H5.11f.::-AZWIII:itlilt& f — - ) 07/30/93 10:20 206 725 8001 JUL-30,1993 10:16 FROM FIFIMICO CO?•IPr"t,UES TO 97634178 P.09 NO EASEMENT (Underground and Surface Rights) P.M. 1230414-4-001 THIS INDENTURE, made this l(2// day of /914usf' ig'13, between ANMARCO, a partnership in t e State of N shington, hereinafter called the Grantor; and the CITY OF SEATTLE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called the Grantee; WITNESSETH: That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar (1.00) and other valuable consideration, receipt of which • is hereby acknowledged, hereby convey and grant to the Grantee, its successors and assigns, the right, privilege and authority to install, construct, erect, alter, repair, energize, operate and maintain underground electric distribution facilities at depths . not exceeding 25 feet, which consist of vaults, manholes, . handholes, ducts, conduits, cables, wires and other necessary or convenient appurtenances; ALSO the right, privilege and authority to the Grantee, its successors and assigns, to install, construct, erect, alter, repair, energize, operate and maintain at the ground level, electric transformer units and electric junction cabinets and/or containers, together with such appurtenances necessary to make said underground and surface installations an integrated electric system. All such electric ,1 m system is to be located upon, under and across the following ; a) described lands and premises situated in the County of King, - 4 e State of Washington, to wit: 0 Those portions of Tracts 28A and 29, Junction Addition 1 N to the City of Seattle, according to the plat recorded 0 in Volume 12 of Plats, page 75, records of King County, Washington, described as follows: Cr; II Beginning at the intersection of the southwesterly margin of 68th Avenue South (Charles Monster Road) , with a line drawn parallel or concentric with and 50.00 feet easterly, measured at right angles or radially, from the centerline of the main track of the Union Pacific Railroad Company, as now constructed and operated, and the easterly and northeasterly right of way line of the Burlington .) Northern Railroad Company as now located, '.: according to survey filed in Book 77 of Surveys, % Al �! page 220, records of King County, Washington; • thence North 34°01'49" West, along said southwesterly sd1 P. margin of 68th Avenue South, 319.02 feet; �' thence continuing along said southwesterly margin, on " �� the arc of a 1462.76 foot radius curve to the ... !i I right, through a central angle of 11°04'00", an i) 'i arc distance of 282.53 feet; thence continuing along said southwesterly margin, North 22°57'48" West, 69.48 feet to a point on the northeasterly line of said Tract 28A, and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 22°57'48" West, along the northeasterly line of said Tract 28A, 10.17 feet; • 1. J thence South 77°27'29" West, 122.64 feet; • thence North 12°32'31" West, 7.50 feet; I thence South 77°27'29" West, 25.00 feet; I1 thence South 12°32'31" East, 25.00 feet; S '. thence North 77°27'29" East, 7.40 feet to a point ;.I t hereinafter referred to as POINT A; 'J thence continuing North 77°27'29" East, 17.60 feet; • Al ` thence North 12°32'31" West, 7.50 feet; rh thence North 77°27'29" East, 124.48 feet to the true point of beginning. t . • i IXCiSpEroTcAX NOT+REOIiIflED w. Page 1 of 3 aa•k.(!�(►( p 4 i' . to v ° j 07/30/93 10:21 206 725 800 1 • ,JUL-30-1993 10:17 FROM RABANCO COMPANIES TO 97634178 P.10 ALSO a strip of land 10.00 feet in width, being the 5.00 feet in width on each side of the following described centerline: Beginning at the aforementioned Point A; thence South 59°15'00n West, 147.00 feet; thence North 63°22'1l" West to the southwesterly line of said Tract 29, and the terminus of said centerline. Together with the right at all times to the Grantee, its successors and assigns, of ingress to and egress from said lands across adjacent lands of the Grantors for the purpose of installing, constructing, altering, repairing, energizing, operating and maintaining said electric system, and the right at any time to remove all or any part of said electric system from jl said lands. tj Also the right to the Grantee, its successors and assigns, I, at all times to cut and trim brush, trees or other plants ;i standing or growing upon said lands which, in the opinion of the 11 Grantee, interfere with the maintenance or operation of the system, or constitute a menace or danger to said electric system. I' The Grantor, its successors and assigns, hereby covenant and I agree that no structure or fire hazards will be erected or permitted within the above described easement area without prior • written approval from the Grantee, its successors or assigns; that no digging will be done or permitted within the easement area which will in any manner disturb the facilities or their solidity or unearth any portion thereof; and that no blasting or m discharge of any explosives will be permitted within fifty (50) anfeet of said lines and appurtenances. O It is understood and agreed that the City of Seattle, City I 2 Light Department, may grant other utilities the right and privilege to occupy and use jointly said distribution system OD and/or easemenc O C, The City of Seattle and other utilities are to be responsible, as provided by law, for any damage to the Grantor through their negligence in the construction, maintenance and operation of said electric and/or other utility systems across, upon and under the property of said Grantor. The rights, title, privileges and authority hereby granted shall continue and be in force until such time as the Grantee, its successors, assigns and other utilities shall permanently remove all said electric and other utility systems from said lands or shall permanently abandon said systems, at which time all such rights, title, privileges and authority shall terminate. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been executed the day and year first above written. s ANNARCO By:G 4=.1.:-; Thl- \ ___V—,_ ' .7.:,, Title: •{' iZ E t• I ::: 7 k ij t Page 2 of 3 3 i 1 ! r z a� atU;iu;;.' ;, s;r},, x; 1 r•- ) 0 . • 07/30/93 10:22 206 725 2001 I • JUL-3071993 10:17 FROM RRF NCO COMPANIES TO 97634179 P.11 STATE OF WASHINGTON) )ss. COUNTY OF KING ) y THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on this /O rt day of vjj+i , 19.ZE, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Publ d in and for the state o Washington ' duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared (4-EP X yyy€I./Ko to me known to be a general partner in the partnership doing business under the name of ANMARCO, which executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the said instrument to be his free and voluntary act and deed and voluntary act and deed of said partnership for the . uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument as a general partner in the partnership. Given under my hand and official seal the dayand + above written. year last a� ;a rA _+'`"OItU,, .- tar ubl c in and �fo- the St• e of i t �����. �,$++,+ Washington, residing at / ��.� ''-E es4P. eta +.1 My Commission Expires: ,— ,s- E :9 �a�MY V: % 2.L_ lh•J. 5•-. t: II + 1 . Q1 O O GO M ! 1 1 . `t ., i . ,M^ Rt t t�•f t!q `:'k • 'it') re:7 0035 r ":Y; • 1 1 i3 lTDAR3Q Ttliki i1) f .� m:2oA}1At,i rrlY:�;lg , {Y,"'?. oT.. biE•c1Y?I i::. APPROVED AS TO FORM Om • ' i Manx(H.S}DRAN _ i : .. ._si Cava re- . Page 3 of 3 r. • ASSISTANT • Date, #/7,-3 i TOTAL P.11 T. . =..____.-_ram .„.;:, x:.;tS'�"^ :'rc .t i` 1 ) ) . . .. • . . . 1...................... 4......,7 omsgas amodausw I NM ma roe mesa 4.54to 42t...•e 4.1zt.f id. Li; APIMIIMM, 10,, ) L,...,•.' 1 s ....._. s't:ry its f.4.0 4., ,s,//. n vt/ • ..efe r_.4(e d :64...it .i...;../.4". t#4. • (fi. - ...reL__..!4.it'its. Z .2...S• 111L ?,,i,•-1 41 • A ,Y GO K 11.1..44..k .4 m...:f I Li'A,. 0Q 6 9/ Plakee.2.461 , til gest P.: (‘i 41,0.0,,to•Iv die.....illr I do A fin;AT Am, iiiMic,.. i ,:,.. • )14 1 r, ./ .4...-i.4,. ..f.._ tec. itficallide. • . ,..id f".NtA1/4 . -4•••/i f 1-y ..r.41.4;.e.(f_td.4./.a.../.../...tilill ..i.a.211...-ie_41,_-•e•.• ;i i,,,,,• °,•4 -414*-• I I , , .. -4:01U. .d. ..Jc‘._ ..._t.t.1....m.i..?tie um.•fayi le;i...A Aii fo,add.....fuir_ ,..dot t.• ICAN4O4 ', ' /. .3. _is ,,,,.... . .t.f..c.c, ..ka e;.' Ili'.c.( A"1.±34.;,44(0.(ie...ea,... f, -.; ,, t a Z_A/4,,,. eS. 6,,,,e,er .e. ,......,ft ROI.44.4,6f,. vii,..—• .......—n. .• 14 id es. cez twit h. 1 1•ft:t.,47:14 : 1 4....r• .___ :_ 1‘....i*....._.%d-7_.. ......__ .f.•it4.4.it it!'14 A•f;i:,.td i etf.titito w id b 440,•..71144r . 7,....a___•-• . .It , ' • • . A i i tig.,„11.. _Are vit. . r , • 1. "4-1s...tri ' _4.cf ' 14. ' _4 . 4.•.. . 6 - ..! Midi illatiMild W it ifidartiMIS MP .! I _ ., ,f, i! i• .1. 42.2e,i I ;Or - ,,,,,,s...1 .... ' ..-lep 32f..i.:.A Ars --...-_-1 • .VW Jill l•; 4- if I e. 4. 0/AV.• 0711,117?r; -. .........: ............ . . • \, ? 0 • d tfir711�...ems a f*. th,.T4CJ //% r. •!'/./le ere. All ta.t. . a i 1 I Li, 2 .i' ,7 ...„:1.,... ..-..,....-''.-1::- ss ant old act I -rap ir t b "�? =,oar 1 1 2E ( i used to a er it :eti 1', �,: eord) T 3r ; t * Iis„rtse� �Iret1 .� ^ 03►>, corp . Ora ,` . �?r �a- iQ�.hi�ag.. t� 1�ail. ►,ova . Y, r_d i4sh1ngton it- i1.rc�c1 .om t Y a e w' find �sTe �,ow j of ..11,i'ecifill.4 , a MUki orpof the et or wri ;T. IId the 8 be !"1.�'1'` t 7riv7. �iiirl euti2ty t ley i'- ._, • �. ' ' 4 1.nc'h setdr P:1...* �_«' :�.2.. moilrt� irl 1 Q; y f } f+ a 4t-iCI; i ,Vt funct1Dni n', : ••,4, �� :z #.ts4. Id'iiCi+� �i M�I�i a �� (� .' °�' � 1� �h ' n; �rwah or �, iq��e end ������ ��� tf€ r � ' :- . , .Q' � center L 1_e3e �f _ �4 r ', -at f` / i I k Ili oo ti r �' •.j` ' `" R_ Fj of t f a "V c Sb l t~'di. :i V Co in tf1. C:• ,' ^ " '. s�3° �,s�� the r n. .r� � ix olio a rdia� A Y. * 1.1 i t L i t� s4 i , r 4 +� 6 yT . 9 a the �ii 1r Ii of he ad r of a nail i ► strt IgAt 1.ir ;:„.. " . .. • n -.tea • y ;':'j' t� i ,* !line of ..ti r of 1v 4 eti p1 ted ,,, the <: Cot •=tea l .` \ i of ^t�i�i tri c1 r� of , d �a y �' aa3.t a ` G�'zt�r li ° ,N_:f ua `54 d. £ er vat'�g a ca ri I.E tz : ., � � 4 t in VI* t t�tlt �'t�='{ti* T�rld = : A "�� • o taa t *;slCiI f 6J cde�y;al42f * t q i y !�t� j of t •Y . a l::. Q 1da ��° k t : ate '1. Mnti uod across oss 'V4e 1t;n the ^? ,. 1114 0•;• 3 �S� Qj � �r �� �rl�+T ,. F_ 3 0 end W i a Lto ea foils, Q{ {t. tile }: ;� in sec ne yy . C.r t ,e !y f ,.f ed V KR #4A' Ir. the ._'r ➢'-,� `,�:-2. being il .:to ,. .. 1� ',:� �� A d =fig-. d le ng des_ in the u: - �. , •Irw �` - .� �i t �'i s i.'E `"i i is tr .. ; {�C`IZ"i i l"�l` +. ... �. i�v . . quo t , 8s t to t...e Wiry " ' z ;r. a 1 t ie , 3 : K asp- -' :-1' ne c1� r j . t tr<� pt off' begof :.i ' : t :>� and :; � `a d `' r�p� • ;K rt �j +. 1 to a ` w tZ�e ., . qAL . �h cs.�n •,+♦iig�.Izr: n®I:j� 1�* i, (. : ., '�ti j. l `� * rt t f t►e'�. - • f .`)w! tail V t'.. i :\11 Co ,: "���r;---. e i `nI A /� .GCS �4.a .0 i�.��R iYt (E W rT l -! _• . • ~ � ti4) \ ; . 0 i 6 '7 4i7.f , , :,�`• 4 • gri t ` �O t h : i).�� ..� , -t 1. 'r'•i.: :ge.,t I :, 1 .-,1 I y =) cc .=r Y cif} f -. "1.F1ri a' ] ' t.rti 1 �. i .i' .i..1.4 - 1:. 1 e .' :l 3}{ k :r + WI 1,10 AU )Li LO i.ka V : .i. 1$ 1, 0. * ,• • .• •• - 1 mtil sm as j3Z , :,, . . ,, - 13.fl. • .-. ' . 4.-i• .• ..:,-, , i (1, 4.„......... :_:„.-,,I , • •,',_ 1 `r 1 „) . .,,,,..,,.._ . ,r.;.1„.,• .:. VA F- • Agrrt fld 43t 2 ) 1930 Sept 3 123 . . • ,'A 1-1 \‘ ii. 1• , , • , . 74 , ,.... . ,... cri f•-•,tz ' os ... regosnington A. ilr “ & ::4,1rIfmtIA., ;.,0ra71, 8. o )r,pp.i. •, t •. •W-7.1 Le:1.' .. 1 , VE Oregirlu #: ni jrepn and SeehinFton Iiellmed Umwmtny .n a*Al:Etr oorip - . • 1 ..-, .,., ...„„ .:-..:? ' .4-22•-• atil -.C..11e tuba 7)f Pakwile „ n riun !,, rp of st afwn • ..4:1Y-• I • ,r: : ,ov 1 l8 the rp -Ind ep aloud idto fin ngrt w by trle .. graetvd to SP r., 2.10. $ ion to ley;clown and r.nintfiin a 4 iso:-. wrolf, t steel wnter p .. , e lint; beneath Iretr la.nda, Fr 'aa4 r of w in ! 14, A '... .'. eZ-,- f -ti.;:: • • ,,,..-g -•-. - • iiriwnell ;.'i i. C. s e at 14 , titip 23 n rii e : at W It ic ow,pAid . N: . . ., iiitiegi iti VIPS strooified lin: tnet t;ne: size oZad pipe:;:..Aine a•riouleji , be 4 Incl.le* in di:”leter, ln•nd thatwhere it 0, osecOd unditrne.atph, the roudb-.d :,; ...1 trqc% 5 :›r ti3tr 3 14 BB z -. V rVit •co it e 'mould bef, pleeed inode of a 6 tact) wr:F..1 ht twas pic.•;, nod . • :;. . ..-.•.. . ". A 11 d li Ili tt r e a esi tt ;-.,,,tz,- Csveit-4.1ted that a4 inob ripe iti(einsufrictem oNIter that lo rIcemi,1 for tix lioenneef v.).: p7ovice .'.,..21: . t,.... - ani twat .: 6 iroh nipe in nisaea:1 ror ttolt rurp; :-:-•,,,,, , ...)w , tuer,t-lfre , it iks hby ly ngreed by erd bet the : :- -*;•,-,, - , • . .. ti 0 - Partios lit° that seetin 3 of od :4{rt 1928 ia .Ja emeded to permit thit lioenoee to lrilt aud psi , .. ,..,:q, • : . 1.':!•,-:.,,,,,, . - :-. pipe bineatb the nd iswist rlght oe say -prid rr ofthe4w eamTmanice :,..,. Ai .z.v.1:. . 1 endtroted61-71°10414totc "rh eteel. ,., ..„ casing * core .113 rive lino oraoses wilerneeth vtd r . of .m. „..,. rui rr of K. .L.i, - - •-:A but ta fill other ream-et*, **teat c,t .rfpNit 1. . , ,...., . • ...,,, • iliv:, . , . 1J2,3 she 1 I be rin,. I'e.•',;b to In to 1 1 force e“, •:.4 r__,,,,...?...... .. - .i,,Afq....-::1:; .,;:, ,,,,, :, • • ) • ..„,,. -,:•.-0 „:.;.z.c•.-,•:, . , .. ,.; ,.,.:.- •:,';;:,':'3 ''-- • ..,, :;5;:,77'',:::::5443;1,,V; i.;;.:. t'."'::4_,,,-;' • " .--;',..4: . .,,..,,, . . .... i. ,. ,. • ,..,,,_:.,1&_,.t, „,.r.:;;•:-,,;-';;.;;.,.•.,,r,,! ...„:i;:ii:f,;,ic r4t4'1=:T,. .:;;;_. ;,.•,i!...',i'- -•-e,, ,;',:: rif.$1 :-.r'qUigit! - -.,:`..,;. :7 :'.. • .. .. - e.:-'.•;;;4; .;%!": ;';;;: ..1:•.. ..7:fr-,,:.:7;',fi.W'=i,*:;:ij:7;4:' :; )? .- ',:"; •,,-,4:..f iii.b:01,-.K. 42"7.1 ,•y; , .,,,,,,,1/41. 1:-,.:•-- .:t157-1,, - :d „ ._ 611•:_i.:,....,.,,,..:.::: ::!;.i.:.: -.,,,,,.::, [ . - ' 17-- - •- 7.* - ..,r :'.': j 1.---,',% , . • :.' .-- 7 ;‘, . _ • -• ^ 7 .. s".'''''''' '.i''':.. ••'-''--';';',*.*:'''.'1' -' .' 1;''''., :Y':::,-.; ' ',:. 7..`:.' : ;:':0-:• '''; ''i.7 :;.. ::%;;, '!,'' .'. . 7 '.' .: ! ?.f:::'-.: ; ; T.' ' •' 1. 7.... ,- . : • i,7 s'::.•.-...,.`. , . . /4. • 6 '.7';' ,• ,-..-., . • . . -.3.14-F;0;F..Mr5-.--:.---.... -. . z• : : `At'" -;r:-=-": ; .-',V? '4);-:,,i1 .1?,---.1.:,,...- . .,•.::7_ e;',4: kve o u 1 tLa inct to 'e e 1.1-;- ,..•,.,...f,, •.- 111 witsibor , t',..,,.7.,., carti--$3 5tf.) ttc ...1,, ti s.s43 :{, ,,•,-, : : (I,i C. La on i La bets 1.1C by It t.f prop officer t he relIntv ci , Ly fl ti :11211 ,, Oreivrt-% : ilaptlzi Railroad di. lia:-''' Lpstion, .., . .i.: '- ' Carapany .,,,i-•t, 1/4-...t,- by ' lia ieffries s vice Pro eorp s -.. ..:,-. 411 4.: ...: : 41 ettest;C 13 V liatilies ? ,ii•inty ft. k..,1/4,-,, i ,Y.. .-,;''..4 .,• i !A 3 Ik, • Oregoz461.1e1 anshingtou 141.11tond aiunDany . ., urphy pres -.. .. .,-,-,: • ('Drp ôl . ttftat 1' 4 leter- 4,' aday , .- „,.--,,,.. rile t....)wn of ruitwila v b jo ha ;;;, ..i n 1 kup rar3yor .6 ' -",*-,f..X • attest j i,,,, D-Iff,3 *Stork . .. , .....t.. _ .... ...„ (Corp al toirn of r) '."C.W..: ttot ecked; fld by J A :):Iff, ti.i LlerK 'rukwil P I, afa 3 ....., , ( 1 T. ) ,z - . : dA'r-,''.- • -•, - . ,z.•-m,‘...;1- l'i 17 -. . • 't,, .... ..,„...A , .. .::,:•,, -. . . ....-. : . I r • • �`V�D 1���5 or'� Original ;0 4klo aO 1R RECD F749-$200 ,� On�11� ® 89,11:08 RECFEE 2.00 `�� i g M,� CRSHSL ***10.00 • 'i. • MINERAL DEED 55 , '1'• 0' THIS INDENTURE, dated as of the 1st day of April, 1971, between UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation . of the State of Utah (successor by merger to Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Company, a corporation of the State of Oregon), Grantor, and UNION PACIFIC LAND RESOURCES CORPORATION, a corporation of the State of Nebraska, with its principal place of business at P.O. Box 7, Mail Station 3300, Fort Worth, Texas 76102-6803 (successor by merger to Union Pacific Land Resources O Corporation, a Utah corporation), Grantee: 01 'I WITNESSETH, That Grantor does hereby quitclaim as CD a cee, andob, theseithoupresentst edoes REMISE, RELEASE capital AND QUITCLAIMnt f CD and by y-I all of its right, title, interest, estate, claim and ulinfdemand, • • 0n both at law and in equity, in and to all minerals and all • mineral rights of every kind and character now known to exist or hereafter discovered in and underlying the property consisting of 24.05 acres more or less, situated in King County, State of Washington, as more particularly described • in Exhibit A, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, oil and gas and rights thereto, together with the sole, exclusive and perpetual right to explore for, remove and dispose of, said minerals by any means or methods suitable to Grantee, its successors and assigns, but without entering upon or using the surface of said lands, and in such as not tot e urface amage interfereer with the used h d lands or thereofbys f Grantor, itslsuccessors to and assigns. I TOGETHER with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above-described • • minerals and mineral rights unto the said UNION PACIFIC LAND I RESOURCES CORPORATION, and unto its successors and assigns, forever. i IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor, UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, has caused these presents to be duly executed as of the day and year first herein written. Attest; UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, . ('• 7 BY _ ' Assists Secretary Executive Vice esident-Operation KING couNN (Seal) NO EXCISE TAX NOV 0 81989 • 1 E1096669 6839i 1• E • I i • • STATE OF NEBRASKA ) SS. COUNTY OF DOUGLAS ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this cxei day of .5fly/(.ina4e: , 19 0, by Mr. R. K. Davidson, Executive Vice President-Operation of Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Utah corporation, on 0 behalf of the corporation. CI 0 O .LL•Lt.t.G� /!» I`Zl V, 0) Notary Public (Seal) 4013.11/11791L,Ste DENN Bplekaska wCom:.. hda 1992 Acknowledgement • • • • 2 68391 •f I I I • LD.095 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY BLACK RIVER JCT. , KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON • EXHIBIT "A" II A tract of land situate in C. E. Brownell Donation Land Claim in Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 4 East of the Willamette Meridian in King County, Washington, said tract of land being bounded on the north by the north line of said C. E. Q Brownell Donation Land Claim, bounded on the south by the south CI line of said C. E. Brownell Donation Land Claim, bounded on the CD, southwest by a line drawn parallel and/or concentric with and wl 50.0 feet distant northeasterly, measured at right angles and/or G radially, from the centerline of the main track of the Union CD Pacific Railroad Company, as now constructed and operated, and bounded on the northeast, east, and southeast by the following described courses and distances: 00 "Beginning at a point on the north d.ine of said C. E. Brownell Donation Land Claim, that is N. 89 47' W. along said north line, a distance of 30.3 feet from the most westerly corner •• of Tract 102 of Second Addition East Riverton Garden Tracts to King County, Washington; thence S. 37°49'12" E. 206.85 feet; thence S. 73°16' E. 185 feet; thence S. 50°50' E. 206 feet; thence S. 78°10' E. 171 feet; thence S. 42°08' E. 117 feet; thence S. 25°22' E. 194 feet; thence S. 18°44' W. 202 feet; thence S. 24°17' E. 257 feet; thence S. 03°05' W. 445 feet to a point on said south line of C. E. Brownell Donation Land Claim." Containing an area of 9.83 acres, more or less. Also, a tract of land situate in Lots 28A, 28B, 29, 30, 31, 32, and 33 of Junction Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, Washington, said tract being bounded on the north by the 3 r` / LD.095 north by the north line of said Lot 32, bounded on the west and southwest by a line drawn parallel and/or concentric with and 50.0 feet distant easterly, measured at right angles and/or radially, from the centerline of main track of the Union Pacific Railroad Company, as now constructed and operated, and the easterly and northeasterly right-of-way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad Company as now located, bounded on the east by the westerly line of County Road No. 24-23, 4-1 (also known as Steel Hill-Charles Monster Road or 68th Avenue South) , and bounded on the northeast by the westerly line of Beacon Coal Mine Road; together with all those portions the vacated roadways across said Lots 28B, 28A, 32, and 33. Containing an area of 13.55 acres, more or less. Also, all those parts of Tracts Thirty-one (31) and f) Thirty-two (32) of Junction Addition to Seattle, King County, wi Washington, described as follows, to-wit: Q Beginning at the point of intersection of the westerly rl line of County Road No. 24-23, 4-1, known as the Steel Hill-Chas. rI Monster Road, as described in that certain quitclaim deed from 0) the Oregon and Washington Railroad Company to King County, uj Washington, dated September 15, 1932, with the southeasterly line. • of that portion of said Tract Thirty-two (32) , heretofore con- veyed to Charles Monster by Oregon and Washington Railroad Company by deed dated June 19, 1923; thence southwesterly along said southeasterly line of that portion of Tract Thirty-two (32) heretofore conveyed to Charles Monster by the O. & W. R. R. Co., a distance of one hundred ten (110) feet, more or less, to the southwesterly line of said Tract Thirty-two (32) , which is also the northeasterly line of a platted street (unnamed) in said Junction Addition; thence southeasterly along said northeasterly line of the platted street, to said southwesterly line Steel Hill-Chas. Monster Road; thence northwesterly along said southeasterly line of Steel Hill-Charles Monster Road to the point of beginning; • containing an area of sixty-seven hundredths (0.67) of • an acre, more or less. Office of Contracts and Real Estate • Omaha, Nebraska July 28, 1989 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Union Pacific Resources Company Attn: Land Administration P.O. Box 7, HS 3300 Fort Worth, TX 76101-0007 • • 1 .. r • . • • ymei - FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF: - 1. Holly K. Towle • . Preston Thorgrimson Shidler Gates c Ellis 5000 Columbia Center • 701 Fifth Avenue • Seattle, WA 98104-7078 • • bdZISOPANDUM Or LEASE Notice is hereby given of that certain Ground I•ease dated August 1, 1991 -IP between AnMarCo, a Washington general partnership as lessor, and Rnbaneo Tr Regional Landfill Company, a Washington joint venture, as lessee, as amended • 00 from time to time, regarding the real property legally described on Exhibit A hereto, which exhibit is incorporated herein by this reference. Said lease is a • for an initial term of 10 years and is subject to renewal options. Up DATED this.30day of July, 1993. 4 • :7 REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY CI By WJR Enviro tal, Inc., ;• HanLazoriden ' g Part er .. BY k.I\ •t u ' V V S STATE OF WASHINGTON ) o , ) aa. / C v. COUNTY OF KING ) ▪ D'1 ; • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Worsen Razors, • I is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he ''' signed this instrument, on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the • . .. instrument and acknowledged it as an officer of WJR Environmental, Inc., the • Managing Partner of Regional Disposal Comany, a Washington joint venture, to . be the free and voluntary act of such joint venture for the uses and purposes . mentioned in the instrument. Dated: July36 , 1993 (Seal or stamp) �r`//� Lu i e R sh, Notary Y 1. .• %%%.vs R.4,%%%, My appointment expires May 25, 1997 '••o NOTARY 50 • • ( —*— . - .. . T.,1 �C I ' :,'.:.: . Memorandum o1.uo n ouaao i ox :••Vim\ ]4. :.';. • :� • d Md Z00 S 033tl Au0103 DO Nd 00:a1E0 f18hE000E6r", ',-.. ;;.�.: ' \\ !...:)......_ i .�� ,'t'. �,r;•T'+:3•i:�,sr,.�',.ws:t ..!'!F:r' .�Fe.+..�:H .,'.,�M.. • f' phi.•,:%'S-'i4?S�!.:.111%17,.r�1;•.(:q�"��La.�)H')( :f JI.•,4�.�''-:BZ.� • • • • • • EXRIBIT A J • LEGAL DESCRIPTION ' • A tract of land situate in Lots 28A, 28B, 29, 30, 31 and 33 t. • of Junction Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, "•'` • Washington, said tract being bounded on the north by the north line of said Lot 33, bounded on the west and southwest by a line drawn parallel and/or concentric with and 50.0 feet distant easterly, measured at right angles and/or radially, from the centerline of main track of the Union Pacific Railroad Company, • .1 as now constructed and operated, and the easterly and ::' northeasterly right-of-way line of the Burlington Northern . •; Railroad Company as now located, bounded on the east by the • westerly line of County Road No. 24-23, 4-1 (also known as Steel Hill-Charles Monster Road or 68th Avenue South), and bounded on • • the northeast by the westerly line of Beacon Coal Mine Road;• `:,'' •' together with all those portions the vacated roadways across said .. • • Lots 28B, 28A and 33, except portion of Lot 33 lying within the ''-„P'>"'�!• • Union•Pacific Railroad right of way. i : ' Containing an area of 13.55 acres, more or less. •<;` ;-;;.•• d' • V t'. • �3�W` •DoT/•G'.� ,1 .•:',t ,�1� .. Seattle ''7ur� ••. • d . e: ' 1:qS�::ri: �,?,, •r .• •. .. .. • .) - .. . t, ;7.r3•``•v-14rt-t(A, jl•y.`Gaz“iff^"a•7 1�+�i'„�-.f•4nyS!? l.'- �5,� • l 1 • / A , After 'Recording Return to: ;~•: • RALPH L. HAWKINS ?;': Davis Wright Tremaine 2600 Century Square ' 1501 Fourth Avenue Seattle, WA 98101-1688 • LEASEHOLD DEED OF TRUST (Black River Property) THIS DEED OF TRUST is made as of this 28th day of July, 1993, between REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY, a Washington joint • venture, whose address is 4730 - 32nd Avenue South, Seattle, , • Washington 98118, and CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, as • trustee, whose address is 1800 Columbia Center, 701 Fifth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104, and SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BANK, as , 0 Beneficiary, whose address is Metropolitan Commercial Banking, "II P.O. Box C34997, Seattle, Washington 98124, Attn: Mike Loken 6u (CSC-11). Cl Grantor irrevocably grants, bargains, sells and conveys to un Trustee in trust, subject to the lease between Grantor and AnMar co Co., a Washington general partnership, the lessor of the property ' .co which is the subject of this leasehold deed of trust, with power „ Q) to sublet, assign or sell, the leasehold estate in the following . property in King County, Washington, described oniibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, together • ' with all interest and estate therein that the Grantor may ..'' hereafter acquire, and together with the rents, issues and • u profits therefrom, all waters and water rights however evidenced • ' or manifested, and all appurtenances, fixtures, attachments, I. • v tenements and hereditaments now or hereafter belonging or appertaining thereto. r' .C.. V1i d fr Grantor covenants the above described property is not used ,..' principally or primarily for agricultural or farming purposes. • o▪ L+! THIS DEED IS FOR THE PURPOSE of securing performance of each r' N agreement of Grantor contained herein and all obligations of •i a Grantor and Borrowers incurred pursuant to that certain Loan '` •o Agreement dated as of July 28, 1993, between Beneficiary, as -- - Lender, Grantor, Rabanco Companies, Rabanco Limited, Rabanco Regional Landfill Company as Borrowers and Warren J. Razore as Guarantor (the "Loan Agreement"), all obligations of Obligors under that certain Credit Agreement dated as of December 1, 1990, • • . as amended by the First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated July 28, 1993, between Beneficiary, as credit Bank, and Rabanco Companies, Rabanco Limited, Rabanco Regional Landfill Company, • Warren J. Razore and John S. Ranchero, Jr., as Obligors (the • "Credit Agreement") and all obligations of Rabanco Company to • Beneficiary under a Loan Agreement dated April 24, 1992 (the "RC Loan Agreement") (hereinafter the "Loan Documents"). The Loan • Agreement provides for loans from Beneficiary to Grantor and the • issue of letters of credit in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $12,200,000 approximately and for issuance by 4 ' 482304o\e\000O6.DOT/7.z9.93 Seattle ' cO'Ll 1f0 SOSD�3N dl}11107 SHIM Ka D0 L EU 5}81-ft8066 CAW"_ oic Nd i+ r . .1 I CD r • IF Beneficiary of standby letters of credit. The Credit Agreement •• provides for issuance of a letter of credit in favor of Flickitat County Public Corporation in the aggregate amount of $17,320,000. The RC Loan Agreement provides for loans through Rabanco Companies in the amount of $11,600,000. f . The Grantor covenants and agrees as follows: • • 1. Subject to the provisions of the Loan Documents, to pay i • all debts and monies secured hereby, when from any cause the same shall become due. To keep the property free from statutory and governmental liens of any kind. That Grantor has lawful • • possession of the property and owns the leasehold estate in the property; that he has good right to make this Deed of Trust and that he will forever warrant and defend said property unto the • Beneficiary, its successors and assigns, against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the same or any part • ' y thereof. The Grantor upon request by mail will furnish a written ,i statement duly acknowledged of the amount due on this Deed of • p) Trust and whether any offsets or defenses exist against the debt - 4 secured hereby. 0 2. To maintain the buildings and other improvements on the i •% y2 property in a rentable and tenantable condition and state of =+� •.J repair, to neither commit nor suffer any waste, to promptly comply with all requirements of the Federal, State and Municipal authorities and all other laws, ordinances, regulations, • covenants, conditions and restrictions respecting said property or the use thereof, and pay all fees or charges of any kind in `• • connection therewith. Grantor shall permit Beneficiary or its - ' • agents the opportunity to inspect the property, including the interior of any structures, at reasonable times and after .• • reasonable notice. •• 3. To maintain unceasingly, insurance, with premiums . 1 prepaid on all of the property that is the subject of this Deed of Trust, or hereafter becoming part of said property, against : • • • any loss by fire and other hazards, casualties and contingencies, ' • as may be reasonably required from time to time by the Beneficiary. Such insurance shall be in such amounts and for '' such periods of time as Beneficiary designates and shall provide • •• loss payable clauses (without contribution) in favor of and in a form satisfactory to the Beneficiary. Grantor covenants upon demand on Beneficiary to deliver to Beneficiary such policies and evidences of payment of premiums as Beneficiary requests. If . Grantor fails to maintain all insurance required from time to • time by Beneficiary, Beneficiary may pay the premium on behalf of • • the Grantor and any sums expended shall be added to principal and • • bear interest at the rate provided in the Loan Documents. . 4827O40\2\00006.DOT;7.29.9] - • seittlo 2 1 • • • =* •,. - ram.. ate,:..:Zi,. V- .•, • • gill r ' 4. To pay in full before delinquent all rents, taxes, " d. assessments and encumbrances, charges or liens with interest (sometimes called collectively "encumbrance(s)" in this section), that may now or hereafter be levied, asseesed or claimed upon the property that is the subject of the Deed of Trust or any part thereof, which at any time appear to be prior or superior hereto " . for which provision has not been made heretofore, and upon request will exhibit to Beneficiary official receipts therefore, and to pay all taxes imposed upon, reasonable costs, fees and . expenses of this Trust. Subject to applicable state law - • • provisions, Grantor shall have the right before any such delinquency occurs to contest or object to the amount or validity ' • of any encumbrance against the property by appropriate legal proceedings so long as Grantor shall have set aside on its books 1 such reserves as are required by generally accepted accounting • principles with respect to such contested encumbrance. On default under this paragraph Beneficiary may, at its option, pay any such sums, without waiver of any other right of Beneficiary by reason '4 of such default of Grantor, and Beneficiary shall not be liable 02 to Grantor for a failure to exercise any such option. • O • U0 5. To repay immediately on demand to Grantor all sums • O expended or advanced hereunder by or on behalf of Beneficiary or • :0 Trustee, with interest from the date of such advance or "' C expenditure at the rate provided in the revolving promissory note executed pursuant to the Loan Agreement until paid and the repayment thereof shall be secured hereby. Failure to repay such expenditure or advance and interest thereon within ton (10) days • • of the mailing of such demand will, at Beneficiary's option, constitute an event of default hereunder, or, Beneficiary may, at its option, commence an action against Grantor for the recovery of such expenditure or advance and interest thereon, and in such event Grantor agrees to pay, in addition to the amount of such expenditure or advance, all costs and expenses incurred in such . action, together with a reasonable attorneys fee. 6. Time is of the essence hereof in connection with all obligations of the Grantor herein or in said Loan Documents. By • • accepting payment of any sums secured hereby after its due date, ' • Beneficiary does not waive its right either to require prompt • payment when due of all other sums so secured or to declare • default for failure so to pay. 7. A default under any of the Loan Documents shall be in event of default hereunder. In the event of a default • Beneficiary may declare all amounts owed under the Loan Documents • . immediately due and payable without demand or notice and/or exercise its rights and remedies under the Loan Documents and applicable law including foreclosure of this Deed of Trust • • judicially or nonjudicially by the Trustee pursuant to the power of sale; provides(, that if Beneficiary elects to foreclose it 4823040%2\c0006.00T/7.29.93 • Seattle 3 1 .,. :-1. .; .,., :.lit. 0 1 • / Rat 3 shall give Lessor of the property, prior written notice of such M ;, foreclosure. Beneficiary's exercise of any of its rights and remedies shall not constitute a waiver or cure of a default. Beneficiary's failure to enforce any default shall not constitute • a waiver of the default or any subsequent default. In the event the Loan Documents are referred to an attorney for enforcement of Beneficiary's rights or remedies, whether or not suit is filed or any proceedings are commenced, Grantor shall pay all Beneficiary's costs and expenses including Trustee's and i attorneys' fees (including attorneys' fees for any appeal, bankruptcy proceeding or any other proceeding), accountants' fees, appraisal and inspection fees and cost of a title report. The property may be sold separately or as a whole, at the option of Beneficiary. Trustee and/or Beneficiary may also realize on the personal property in accordance with the remedies available under the Uniform Commercial Code or at law. In the event of a foreclosure sale, Grantor and the holders of any subordinate • 41/ liens or security interests waive any equitable, statutory or - alp other right they may have to require marshaling of assets or 1.4 foreclosure in the inverse order of alienation. Beneficiary may • Q at any time discharge the Trustee and appoint a successor Trustee U0 who shall have all of the powers of the original Trustee. 1 '0 8. If the property or any part thereof is sold, conveyed, :, 0) transferred, encumbered, or full possessory rights therein • transferred, or if a controlling interest in Grantor (if a • . corporation) or a general partnership interest in Grantor (if a • partnership) is sold, conveyed, transferred or encumbered, without the prior •written consent of the Beneficiary, then • Beneficiary may declare all sums secured by the Deed of Trust ' • immediately due and payable. This provision shall apply to each and every sale, transfer, conveyance or encumbrance regardless of ,• whether or not Beneficiary has consented or waived its rights,, whether by action, or nonaction, in connection with any previous • sale, transfer, conveyance or encumbrance, whether one or more. 9. a. After a default hereunder, Beneficiary may commence, appear in and defend any action or proceeding which may • affect the property or the rights or powers of Beneficiary or Trustee. b. If Beneficiary so requires, Grantor shall pay to . • Beneficiary monthly, together with and in addition to any • payments of principal and/or interest due under the Loan • • Documents, a sum, as estimated by the Beneficiary, equal to the real estate taxes and assessments next due on the property and • the premiums next due on insurance policies required under this • • Deed of Trust, less all sums already paid therefor, divided by the number of months to elapse before two months prior to the . date when the ground rents, real estate taxes, assessments and ' - • • • 68230t0\2\00006.00T/7.29.93 4 • Seattle • • • .l. .s(" - - _ r,•-r-- e--:-- .r�^^.r ?..•^.'.^-•-ter t p • 1111 • • insurance premiums will become delinquent. No interest will be paid on the funds in the reverse account. • c. Grantor hereby absolutely and irrevocably assigns to Beneficiary all Grantor's interest in the rents and leases. So long as Grantor is not in default under the Loan Documents, • Grantor may collect the rents as they become due. Grantor's right to collect the rents shall not constitute Beneficiary's consent to the use of cash collateral in any bankruptcy proceeding. In the event of a default, Beneficiary shall be entitled, without notice, without bond, and without regard to the adequacy of the property, to the appointment of a receiver for the property. d. This Deed of Trust shall also serve as a financing statement filed for record in the real estate records as a fixture filing pursuant to the Uniform Commercial Code. To the extent applicable, this is a security agreement under the Uniform OD Commercial Code. This Deed of Trust may be given to secure an v.' obligation incurred for the construction of an improvement on the rt property, including the acquisition of the property or to secure O an obligation incurred to refinance an obligation, incurred for ID the construction of an improvement on the property, including the • d acquisition of the property. CI e. Grantor shall deliver to Beneficiary during the term of the loan, at Grantor's expense and as provided in the • Loan Agreement, Grantor's and all guarantors' certified financial statements and certified operating statements in form • satisfactory to the Beneficiary covering the property. • f. If any payment made or to be made under the Loan Documents shall constitute a violation of the applicable usury laws, then the payment made or to be made shall be reduced so that in no event shall any obligor pay or Beneficiary receive in amount in excess of the maximum amount permitted by applicable usury laws. g. The rights, duties, liabilities and obligations of - the parties under the Deed of Trust shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington. 10. a. Grantor is the Lessee under that certain lease • dated as of August 1, 1991 as amended by the First and Second Amendment between AnMar Co. as Lessor, and Grantor as Lessee (the "Lease"). Grantor warrants its right, title and interest in the leasehold estate and its right to convey a security interest therein, and in the Facility as defined in section 5 thereof subject to no liens, encumbrances, easements, assessments, security interests, claims or demands of any kind except those set forth in any commitment or policy of title insurance accepted 4E23040\200006.DOT/7.29.93 Seattle .5 .r,. 1 . •....:...':y:raK. • . � . ,;,;if:ri',J 1a`"4rig ': .":":�6.:TY&ir • i . • • . by Beneficiary and those approved by Beneficiary in writing (collectively, the "Exceptions"), and real estate taxes and assessments for the current year. The Exceptions and the real estate taxes and assessments are not delinquent or in default. Grantor hereby warrants and agrees to defend the validity and priority of the lien of this Deed of Trust and the security interest granted herein. All of Grantor's covenants, representations and Warranties made herein are subject to the rights of the Lessor. If Grantor hereafter acquires fee simple title or any other estate or interest in the real property - described in EXHIBIT A, no merger of the leasehold estate of • Grantor with the fee simple estate of the Lessor shall occur, but the fee simple estate or any other interest or estate hereafter acquired by Grantor shall immediately become subject to the lien ;•. . of this Deed of Trust, and Grantor shall, immediately on request • by Beneficiary, execute, acknowledge and deliver any instruments 0 Beneficiary may reasonably request to carry out the purpose and ry intent of this section and to give notice thereof. Grantor (p hereby grants to Beneficiary a security interest in its contract ' 1.4 rights under the Lease. V 0 b. Grantor shall at all times fully perform and comply with all covenants, warranties, representations and other • ''. 0 obligations imposed upon or assumed by it as Lessee under the Cl Lease. Grantor shall deliver to Beneficiary, immediately upon receipt, all notices of default served upon or delivered to Grantor by the Lessor under the Lease. • c. On receipt by Beneficiary of any notice of default from the Lessor under the Lease, Beneficiary may rely thereon and after determining whether Grantor has cured or is in the process of curing such default may take such action as Beneficiary deems necessary and desirable to cure such default, even though the existence of such default or the nature thereof is denied or :%: disputed by Grantor or any other parson, and Beneficiary shall have the absolute and immediate right to enter upon the Property `I to such extent and as often as Beneficiary, in its sole discretion, deems necessary or desirable to prevent or cure any :i'Ca``•-�::+: default by Grantor under the Lease. All expenses incurred and ;� "•':"'• advances made by Beneficiary in connection with curing or preventing any default by Grantor under the Lease shall be (' !� ;• treated as advances byBeneficiarytoprotect the Collateral. •�-- d. Grantor hereby represents, covenants and warrants that: (1) The Lease is in full force and effect and unmodified; . . uusmow\000es.oa1/7 29.93 settle 6 • T 7-uh�wrr..:•w 41 • i • • (2) All rents, including additional rents and • other charges due under the Lease, have been paid to the extent they were due and payable prior to the date hereof; (3) Grantor shall warrant and defend the leasehold estate created under the Lease for the entire remainder of the term set forth herein, against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming, or who may claim the same or any part thereof, subject only to the payment of the rents reserved in the i Lease and to the performance and observance of all of the terms, covenants and warranties thereof; and • • (4) There are no existing defaults in the .0 performance of any of the terms, covenants and conditions or warranties of the Lease on the part of Lessee therein to be • observed or performed. Ei 11. a. Grantor represents and warrants to Beneficiary that to the best of Grantor's knowledge after due and diligent inquiry and except as allowed by law, no hazardous or toxic waste 4 or substances are being stored on the Property or any adjacent 4 property nor to the best of Grantor's actual knowledge without 0 investigation have any such waste or substances been stored or yl used on the Property or any adjacent property prior to Grantor's 0) ownership, possession or control of the Property. Grantor agrees to provide written notice to Beneficiary immediately upon Grantor becoming aware that the Property or any adjacent property is being or has been unlawfully contaminated with hazardous or toxic waste or substances. Except as allowed by law, Grantor will not cause nor permit any activities on the Property which directly or • indirectly could result in the Property or any other property becoming contaminated with hazardous or toxic waste or substances. "Substances" means any substance or material defined • or designated as hazardous or toxic wastes, hazardous or toxic material, a hazardous, toxic or radioactive substance or other similar term by any applicable federal, state or local statute, regulation or ordinance now or hereafter in effect. b. Grantor shall promptly comply with all statutes, • regulations and ordinances which apply to Grantor or the • • Property, and with all orders, decrees or judgments of • governmental authorities or courts having jurisdiction which Grantor is bound by, relating to the use, collection, storage, treatment, control, removal or cleanup of hazardous or toxic substances in, on or under the Property or in, on or under any adjacent property that becomes contaminated with hazardous or toxic substances as a result of construction, operations or other activities on, or the contamination of, the Property, at Grantor's expense. Beneficiary may, but is not obligated to, enter upon the Property and take such actions and incur such costs and expenses to effect such compliance as it deems 4823040\2\00006.00177.29.93 Seattle '7 r � r,e& 1..j • . • • . . • . . . . it= . •• • • • • • • .. ... . . • . • .%.., •. . . . . . .. . • • , . . . . : - . • . . - . . . . . .. ...._ ..., ... . . . . .... ........ . ........ .. • • . , . ., .. . . . • . . .. . .. ..... .. . . . . .. . . .. .... .. .. .. . . • . ... .. .. .... • . ,. • , .. . . , . . .. .... . ., . . . . . . ... . . . . , . . .. . . ._ . ,• • . . • • . • • • • • . • •• ..• .4.'1. ••.•.•• ...• • . • ' . . . . • • . • . . . . . • • • . . .. . .• •• .. .• • • . • . • . 'M., • • •. . • ' . • ' •• •• • .... • . • .• . • . • . •. ' .• • . ••• ' . • • • •'.•."•••••:.;•'.'.•'',•'..:;:'..*:V•4 t••••N.•'..;•:••....4.4.''Fii!,:4i.:A.4..r.,:!i•,%.:•i,t7.j'..%AAVV;*f.T:'•N*1:14:Ci;/..::;'...';', 444./.''...•••••• ••1'.'S • .• .. "• ,• : ... .. • .•..•' .•••'"'•••7•••:••••••:' '•.,•••••:i!•••••• ':.•:."•:14:::•.....4.'r:1'..1..•;''•,";..Y.Thi•.''•••,••••••!''''',..,•'.... ••,..f•Al?,i.:..•••••••...:..' .• .. . • • . MO .:.......7..::;• r.:••.•:••' • % %'...“:".k.r...1::: • • ./!:':::i..::::..7..!:;,:!'. advisable to protect its interest as Beneficiary; and whether or ' !:•-•::,.....',....::.;•_.:..:•1 not Grantor has actual knowledge of the existence of hazardous or toxic substances in, on or under the Property or any adjacent 4...i...•zi.:.: .v.,•••A'...: property as of the date hereof, Grantor shall reimburse ..f i,7.:•,t••,•...1";•:.•7•!..' Beneficiary on demand for the full amount of all costa and ..:•.'.:,..1 :•,,I--..-,.: expenses incurred by Beneficiary prior to Beneficiary acquiring ,.•'..• ;', :%"••.:•..•••.f.'-'.:i•-., title to the Property through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure, in connection with such compliance activities. -,...,-.,,,_-?•;',:.A.: • 12. Notwithstanding any contrary representations, covenants .'. '.':,....:•.f•;••:;1,7::':. , . or warranties contained herein, all of such representations, ,......,,,....:•.!...:-..:::;::;• -,:,!..;"•..17- :'4;7,•,...fi covenants and warranties are subject to the terms and conditions in the Agreement Regarding Solid Waste Handling between Klickitat •......,..•4,:;•:...; ,•.::,:, County and Grantor dated as of May 26, 1989. , •f,--.',:•••v••-fr.•; ••••1,;:".: .''...:i•;,:: !•'•.i.'4!:.•1;: WITNESS the hand and seal of the Grantor as of the day and .;:•.%,....:.:•1...r.;•,.. year first written. fry REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY r4 By WJR Environmental, Inc. - '...::•••••••:.,s,•:••••-•,-,•.. .:'S•...,::,:0-.1.":"!:4'... ..1 CO Its Managing Partner .•;;;,1;:,...:.!-*•:::,,i;J:i,:: ' (20 • ,•,;e,,-..L',, ..•'.;•.t.4,:•,:.,1,::. 0 .•'4••.''.4 IF 4,-.*,,.-.g,P.i , cl I Cr) By (AA-LA- . • ,z,...,:.,..,!-,:1,.......),.. Warren J. Raz , President • ...1::=4.4.:.t.'4'.U1.- •-, :.':•%';i0W.;. i .•:...',;.:,...i. ..;F.t.4V.gs:;.1/4;i STATE OF WASHINGTON ) i ) es. ••.,•1;:?::df•1:i...:,,t'.!: ..• 1:;•:'4,;,57.4%;:::•V'' '. ,:,.....1::•;:•.*.v.Vdt- COUNT( OF KING ) .... •..:te.,:...e ”•;,...:i.,-:/kF,,... On this in and day of (-224 , 1993, before me, a Notary Public n and for the Sitiote of Washington, personally appeared WARREN J. RAZORE, per onally known to me (or proved to '..*:',-.Y...iNitv...f.'......i . me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person who executed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized . to execute the instrument, and acknowledged it as the President i;:,•i..:1,..:;;;;If.'.:;.(F.).':';: ••!':.:::!!,•,',.::xiv,.S ., of WJR ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., Managing Partner of REGIONAL DISPOSAL •,:,•-•••,..,•t..i..i.,=7,:;:•,1,‘• COMPANY, to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said • •....:-:!-,,,.:•....1-..7;:i%•.,.. ,,,,,,....,,,,,•-•••,..,..,i, corporation for the uses and purposes mentioned in the ...;,7.:.,1'-:P. ::.!-'.;:'.• instrument. •:-!•i..: ..,',,•,•:,•:-- ' .:-••••;;..,•:•••:!.....::•'for-z4 • '.--,21:.,:",,a...}..fc..; ,....;:,T1,..0:!.;:•.,,..,..,,,....,,, • ..... ...,:".. ..r.:' ,!. •V"," ..K.V1:.`..1%. '.74F,''.:kg.:.1,'.•:.;:-.1.4 . ' .:.;•'..,.:•••4!re;•.4 . .;.!f!I•Vjg:gii0... '171.gc!lqi:X4W .11i.:'36Til*i10 ' 41323040‘200006.00117.29.93 tjfeifOn 1%47' Seittl• 8 -,•,-,-.-•-.pkil re: .1.-7,,s.. . •••%..;E;4t;,,e,',,,,. WI • d.,..ttitkll'v-V14.L., • iitiN ''1`.12.4 il'i s..q.1.7c... r, ... ... . ' 7-••••;I•'....";:•••••••,•';',•—• •'•••:,,:•:''•,:••;"7:!••i.,.r.;'••::: .::'•';:'`'-..:.*...•:•;;-.."•'• .•''••: .''' *•'•''' .7"•!•• 54' •-"' a'"?'.-..7"4 -AV44-V.:0414.tlY'r -t1;,":1•• . -•'•'!. F..":-. •••!A' 7''''•..•• • • ....• .'••::•7••••-• i..,.... — • • . '•-•'.:• ••••• •••• !.'•••,,..•• *•:‘:nr.7.- r .,.•h''1 '•-',TP?'.c•••,r•-•!,v,-, r-7,•:.',.i ';‘4•14,7.V•••.... " • • • • •••••.•• .. ..: , ) •.....-....... .. ..s. .•-•'.. ....... ::'....::'...:.... ...•-•••••,:•••::.:•-•••••:"'!.,..9.,.•",.... ../,',..s:. .•••••••••E . ). .,..i:::,,-;:.•,..-:.., . • . . . . . . • . • . .. . .. . els • • • . .. . , . . •• • • . . • . .. . . . • .. . . . • • . . • - • - - ' • • • • .... • •• ..•• • .. .• • •.... ,. . • . .:.... • . . . . . . . ... • • -••• • ••• •• - . . •. . • ••• • • • . • . . .... • • •. . : • • • , . • . • . . . .. • . - • • . . . . • . . .. . •,... ...-.. .• . ..• ..• .' . . ... ... . . .. .,. . .. . . . • • . . . . . . . ,. .. . • .. . ... , ".• •. . . . . . .. .. . .. • • . . . . . . .. ... • • .. .• • • • ..• •• • • . • • • . • •-•.".'2 ' • . • • . . . • • . •.• • . .• • •• . . • • . • .. • • ' •.••.. ".• .. . • •''''"----4,••:1:-;:..::.....lifi:1,-;;•fl..:-..-•I:.••••••!'...:F....•••4:-!;,i,r....-.;..'..„•-•••,iA.•...ix.-.;••.,':4:;;'..t'...,•ir:',:i;:::.:::..........I.,..•..... .-••- •.• . • ' . ,-....—•,..,:a_::•••:?.f...:•:11..lil.:..tit',.. "••••;',.;):75..:4".?"'''41.f.‘;cleli•;:i:P.kr.: :-;',1:,••••,;i:-. 4 -..,..,..1...:,....1,-,,,74, :.__zp$1,,Ki7..0:44..f•W'':'.'•• •',."'; - -.14-11..:2•441•7.;As....,.;.!:cr.,..?-: •• IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set ay u-.1" hand and official • seal the day and your first above written. .. • . . .... - • .... ..,..3 . IfOl'ARY PUBL.IC -in and for • • • , • ...•...,-:-. ... • J,. . . ,.,..,;:•i.,Q. on,6, zesiri:ina - .e.,../._., •, . 1. • • of wasta prnyinat1111.nninitent,ere sta e , •.: .T..-. r4: ;'. :•-..; t••;416,, . ., r•,3 .. ,..., • roe _ • •• • \,. . tr.e.•;:o • . - •• •••"")3 '....•.•••:• ..•'...-:.1 • •-::••• ••• 1 - •. .... . .. ,........ • 0 :,;.•:,:.::,-; rit •••.•':‘;';;;• • • GO ... • rq . .,...1•.:!.) ' CI .:;!"••••!?' . • 0 .:•:„,-,t...,! (1) ••?..k:•"."V •:;..,--:„...,4 .•••••...,...; - • c-3 •••:,..t.:f.,„t: cr) •::F.-„...„ ........ '• 'P.‘..•..::itill • . . .••, ::!•.'••;',..1; ,.•••.::;:g?.:it: . • .'. :..*:•!•V•:Fs2 :-....-:::.•ii:Fli ..i.....:i'..;.'!".:::-..V 1.••,,ie.,.,-•••g• ...• -.......:4•tt•"::: ,.• .--:7•.".i.4;•' . • • :!..:...T.J.t.•'''.•':' ''......7:•••':.:.:'.1. ''i,14:,:7.-i:,'..,'• . . • • :1•;••0•••••••;"'i....'" . . ....;.::::•::.:.i.•••'...1..;.•:''•••).. ••••:'s'.:•:••,' ••••*•••••••••••W'.•:,.. • . , ' ....1:•':2...:::•E•,:1?;•;":1 • • •••..::••..:.::.1,•!;;...,•t',... •:%:.. ...,..:.'i.` . 1 • ...-:::-..... .:•-••••••%•;-?•M • ....5...'.:•:&;..1•::::iii .. l••••....;;: ecr'l • - 482304012‘00006.80171,29,93 . Untie 1...g,l'iikf4:44•;'1•t••-:•'0,4 •• 9 70t.:;;VI,VP. •-•"7.:.iiinkit;•0411 ?.: :•.:-,,),. _.,.. ••.s., • • ,p14warr- J T . ,m,..• ..-yr4-.4, 5,ae.,4•,,..,,.. .,.,c.. 4 ,...ti..0 ., •-,;., . • ' . • . .777:"::7n.,•--,-r477,.,77-----% feirei..• :41,:-' • • _ . . — - :•.4�Vit, ':;.:Tr p1:#1%.'X.f:,J':.kl_'..a,. .7}t :.l•• • `'. • :l • • .'l. •,T. '•1'• T L "�:.,�.�;'•� • • EIHZT A • :` ;;;:`;; : , GAL DESCRIPTION ;ice -r't A tract of land situate in Lots 28A, 28B 29, 30, 31 and 33 e�',"�r(;�',. of Junction Addition to the City of Seattle, King County, '' ' ;.1,uWN J: -;X: Washington, said tract being bounded on the north by the north .`�:: f=re line of said Lot 33, bounded on the ;pest and southwest by a line i1,`: -•";c'�..•:, .. drawn parallel and/or concentric with and 50.0 feet distant "1,t4: ..A . easterly, measured at right angles and/or radially, from the �!i0.1:„'; • centerline of main track of the Union Pacific Railroad Company, �>r':%«=t.•'r . as now constructed and operated, and the easterlyand `'"r`>` J4'i :1 northeasterly right-of-way line of the Burlington Northern : ;4 �,J;may..,...6:.: Railroad Company as now located, bounded on the east by the -;.:I:.;4:d': ;;ai F i r:.•0 i westerly line of County Road No. 24-23, 4-1 (also known as Steel :.,:� ;t,l,•:;t`J•'l • Hill-Charles Monster Road or 6Sth Avenue South), and bounded on k � ��s�,%%':•`u( the northeast by the westerly line of Beacon Coal Mine Road; -:razz 2 Lots t28B,er with all those 2 A and 33 exceptions the port on of Lotd33olyingswithinstheid ; ^` kt%„" w r 'fh,.' 4' '•1 1.1 Union Pacific Railroad right of way. :`>• - • :t',„n r'• fh: h.�`.A.0, • Q Containing an area of 13.55 acres, more or less. t_• �:h7' t]g'7 •4:•:yr-1'.t T.J. r.};�...,fli ..1.1;:;:z1.:1:4,11.r;!:•.1:0;1.:!ill.,5.).F..:. f; .•j�•z4I4,. A • .f 4,�1'�s- ;k;;V'r `ii/ti .,:?:AP I • J ''`41r5'gy'i.Sl• 48230 0V\NNOO6.DOT/7.29AI 10 ,4 w, kettle . . �... I�«'• ••1.J�PRfu;C�''ti' I\' l' •1 • .i. _• +:,: ,,i s •'•.1 ♦ •.E,is l•.a:.•=4-71r,.iw•r�_,..?., . r.% .C_ _�� !gel•'..t�M;.n-. � r.ie:J ol�n.:—�• �^s•.-y .. '•J _ • _. • '.I::i.:.... ..r. .'I-'� ....-•fi:.rJ• 1'." ..••.'l. i. 'y?••y:.J::'' .,,�' •fl • • j • - - ii,• -'•• :- • . --, ) •. -,-;• .....„-,. ... : . . • Mm , . • • . . . . . .''' • • 4 . . ' • • • . • . . . •..,. . ( • .. • ., • • • .., • ' . :7".'a • . . • • • •• ::• .-..:,...•.... ....,....;.+•:.4.;•:...i. -./....,:,74..,•Y;'‘,1;z,•'•:-/ -4.1''r •••;4:1. • . . . % '.. ... REQUEST FOR FULL RECONVEYANCE . • • ,.23 To be used only when all obligations have been paid under the Loan Documents and this Deed of Trust. TO: TRUSTEE. The undersigned is the legal owner and holder of the Loan Documents and all other indebtedness secured by the within Deed • ..•:•,..:;!::•;..,• of Trust. Said Loan Documents, together with all other O indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust, has been fully paid and satisfied;satisfied; and you are hereby requested and directed, on payment to you of any sums owing to you under the terms of said 1 Deed of Trust, to cancel said Loan Documents above mentioned and i::‘!%., ::441 "; ....14 1••::, •::, .:-•:•:•,42:16,all other evidence of indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust delivered to you herewith, together with the said Deed of Trust,and to to reconvey, without warranty, to the parties designated by - .•::•i•,•••-:::•! the terms of said Deed of Trust, all the estate now held by you T::,4.,,,...-....i.thereunder. :::-. ':'••:,.y.- • ' 14 •1,..,,,•,..4_, • ttr ...,- ;:61.-,:t;::: 1 2) Dated 3 - 02 By ...., „ 4 Its •.4"1:-::,:c.,, CO ::;w•-;•,....- .'; !•4;y:.-. • yl CO . ,../......,j,:Mail reconveyance to: .1.- , 1 ••:•:,".1,..7../:....,•4 - .•::;,:- ci---, ., .-,c-;•e,-;.:: .... :/.ili';•:',•••• .‘ ;t• I?.6 • :':.:%(.%:K:: • ••..J.1“..1.-- `:• . .•;.•:;;-::.'..,••'.• ..-.,...: • .:....V-;4%•••••:;4,'• .. ...:Y. -'".-• :!•::T....: ......;%•'',, • . ':..:•••`;':..z4:-'•;*".:`1 • • L'IW4A; 4823040X21.00006.00T/7.29.93 • • Seattle 11 •-W4ticl'A1-45 , • 14Wil i JOY,0124 ••4:44,.I''..e.d. '..- 11:r 111 EWE ICA'414 . 7 . . i RECORD OF SURVEYF INK•S•C0A•AA CY T.C.ArOWTLL DON•"'ON LA•• r \ __ W•.r 6 T• w w ...,:•_.r00 Tr• RAvEP-i h • ` A PORTION OF THE E 1/2 OF SE 1/4 OF SEC . 14 , TWP . 23 N . , RGE . 4 E . , W . M . ,z Z CITY OF RENTON , NON - • KING COUNTY , WASHINGTON • H6• 34 0'• 2267.45' INA-• Co, 7244 S I 1 --,zi46 S'133RD STREE• tPLC LINE C/ SUO•NELL I I T• ��4�7 • w a1rt10• ' .�. DE C NC.AI 0 )J:. 60C T FOUND FPaSH NA. E" I L•'979.� y A - - ADSII•t`r1 AS RE-CONSTRUCTED FROM - -- N•-• - -_--� 0.274NDR�R OrELN:C GARDNER I WTCIIMKS s �•- -- �. SCALE I 1s-L1-Wa1 sOHtEr: 0 .44•sa"3� I. Lra •....-. } 1• . SDOt I 1 L•224.62 i - - AilPn-'.' R•P96A7 \ D 37. •SOMD COPPER iN IN 4'•4•CONCRETE POST 1.2'BELOW MACE t4.13.99 T I` O.OT- . H` WI • SET WI 192,.2• GARDNER 1 N':•°ME •4•rr. T,'ril . .N . J4 ON O -.-13020 .. '. _ PACE SI)ON THE NORTH LINE Cr THE DONA' , •S' ;LAN AN.,MATCNES 1„ • FELL WITH MONUMENTS B AND• 'Hi- TITA:TL-r F=•41.-ITNE)NJNtwEMTR IL•N a. L A,S AND C AND HAD A RAM CLOSURE or OC'Or 2?'AND O.]6 FEET. 7 \ , ivr7 f 'NORTH LINE C.E.BROWNELL DONATION! AN- : AM ANL .•' Tr_N Nr VONI:••FN• TIED I.R` - •NLn HARM W BRASSIE O.a'•• CONG PAST a-3••QI.•HIS MOH NOVEMBER 1 1920 IN GARDNER I N'CrSNCS MELD Bvvr '•4 CN f A• HI CAL-Jt.A'E: CIO m c _ ••.p•rSSl'C,rp L.erlt•r.cs•.NO. W20 REFER TO GARpICR L N,� FROM 1920�RAVENSE AHD MONUMENTS U.B ANp C. N01•UYFNT nAb BEEN IBVTERA'ED • Boo• T..N 0M rOuND TAT MGM.TO ba••. •.O.LIHE R' AT THE TWE Or TNF 1920 SURVEY•TY:1 BEARN.•TREE°WERE STILL IN TIPSTENI'F. -.a' .,rN•r.}LANs TO iuu K. ,- SCALE I FOUND TACK IN WOODEN PI II,T IN 1•DIAMF'CN WIPE'.•W-N>t T VAC IRON c a. 1• - 200' PPE TO BE I.509.2C FEE) SOUTH OF THE N. '•'LINE Or THr D.' S).,,,t L' •.•JHL PUNCH N•R7 IN BRASSIE W 4••4'CONCRETE POST 0.3-19: LAID CLAN AND 0.04'B .T OF THE EAST ,L OF THE DONATION LAND IN • I. _ IC RECORO OF THE EST•t.'SwIENT or Tw5 Np+AK. - CLAIM WHICH GAROTTER A HITCHING. ':TINE N 1970 I t DOOM 2_-. t ' M0N.TO St 0.37'S.OF LNE. HELD NON PPE FOR THE EAST LNr or THE DL"-AT •.,LAND CLAIM. •'S rn. I yr HELD THE POSITION Or MONUMENT•C•FOR THE NORTH LINE Or TN, ' ry 5..•\ •. JUNCTION ADD,•JN'SINCE M.• '••:N- +A rC'reTUAT10N DE -HE OLD MONSTER RD. d STAKE NOTED ST GARDNER 4 H .'Pc WED. ._ I's \ 1S r a•4W'.3'00' ALIGNMENT L•244.4r L•19.79' Hz NN R.2B6.ar I S• 137TSNT STRRET • DETAIL MOM.'CP 0.3r,•; 1 wok•1•O.19• INSiogi ,RUCTE.I . _ S.OF LNE T- 1 5.OF LINE %o t', - I, N WW]4'04'W 3643.51• 1 z z 1 1 si 1 - 7W.96' 498.90' \ T-713.48' - N3C.2C - _ 62.00 GLE 0.00 E.HIRD.RD. rr N y '•2 .44•SS'30' S7.Y4' FAST LNE C.E. I `A4 ,7 N L•tt4 er - co •? I �' N.\ BFVNELL D.L.C. I \ J O ' N.> 2 / JUNCTION NORTn La•L Lk-JUNLTiON•;LlTi:t •� �O} ��U . NOTE: \ HELD FAnLLI CL TC NORTH LILAC l7 .mil_ }}7 • ADDITION DLC AS RE. 'ARDNEF A H•TCHJ. I L f,.R p 9• FJ 'E� J OF E l••.. . c.• 04•47'22' \ SS `T0. I• \ Y+�_Gr p a REFER .. • ... - L• 342.73' \ / ` / I W CONTROL DETAIL I �• _ LP.' *a}}� O_m` /1 R•43276 RGIR P • - R•4700.00' 7.45' F 1 . 7 .... • G I I I FOUND PN N 4'•4'COHERE 7C POST Y-3-B91 THIS ONWCNT WAS SET BY�� \ • '!a -a\ A 1 k !1 GARONCR•NITCWNG5 N NCSENBEF 192G IREFER TOM GARDNER i MTCMNGS 1 r.� p t N 22 57'4B•S FELD 900K 234,PAGE 531. AiavNER 1 WTCHINGS PLACED THIS MONUMENT KCAS MNOMENT B•50 CAtC '-- 7� A. ..30 \l, /i_ 312.13• oN A PARALLEL LINE WITH THE NORTH LINE Or THE OONA.I.t:LANG CLAW \� FROM KCAS TRAVERSE Ar•: ^ EYNATING FROM AN'OLE STA.:.THrT FOUND AT THE EAST LINE OF THE 1' BREAKDOWN OE SEC.e C'.•• - �O �.l\ \ DONATION LAND CLAIM AND THE SOUTH LIME OF THE'NORTH 1,509.20 FEET' I THE PUBLIC WARS MAF Of:. • OF THE DONATION •'.0 CLA• INS MONUMENT WAS HELD TO BE ON THIS �' y 0 4. -�S; 20 t1 I PARALLEL LINE.THUS CSTA.'...HMG'inE NORTH LINE OF THE•JUNCTION I \ 1 i ` --A'rO4,OO• ADDITION*TO BE I•510.71'CC:LI.1."Tn OF THE NORTH LINE Or THE DONATION _ O O L•27H...r LAND ELAIM. ' I _, 71+�** N\\ / t.,, /`� \ R-1432.76 0.03' I ;I d _IOI2`L 1 I"- r I I I I • •-- - 4 *�* // 1eA I LEGEND: yrll \ " e'-MOHJN[HT rO:IHC..S W.•L, Ira �•I \ p•23.25-OW'le 1 •7u. 0•CALCULATION PONT '�--4•- 1 -i-B a c• L•33L36' • \L\, e:OB•S77D' if• Y N' R•1300.00' •. L•13Lo3. .; . _ R B.W38.03' BASIS OF BEARING L•974J2• R•W.03* 4 I I s.W.COP SEC.If,TWP.73 N., r BASIS0, BEng.. AMBERT GRIP NORTH 2OIJE-BASED ON In ROE.4 E..vim.,Fla.BRA55 4 IS N 07'76 4,.•• KCAS BEARING 1•oi.THE SOUTH lilt or a TWP. 23 N•, RGE• 4 E., W•M• DISC IN CONC POST IIY•30•B91 / 1 rH. SW IIa Or SECTION 13. 1:'RGE.4E.E.,SEC.O. BRASS~' INDEX SKETCH t z4 -- •-- -. - i . 14 13 DISC WI CONC.POST D2-30-SSl • 2692 DC'KCAS BASIS OF BEARIN'; 2692.C' MERE N W7.26.66 •• 2J 24 26P2 PT ME AS '' • •-• - - _ SOUTH OU4R•EN CORNER SEC'.Os.3,T:t SSHIP 23 NORTH,P.m. •A . v • 269d.S6'KCAS ' Wry FOINA 3'BRASS MSC N CONCRETE POST 112 30-9R1 INY,We. RECORDING CERTIFICATE: LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: r� Bargha�usen ��S E1/2 of SE1/4 14-23N-aF S�I1 ;- R•c0r01D3 Nu.--_ logo••P co'T.ttlh•••r1••.t...d••t re.by w•r YI••••, . ' • Consulting Engineers.Inc. •u"•TI f;,t ---- I rll•o ter recera telo__ot e7 , t.a .1-- •1•atlo••1.cerfor••,n onto too r•wlr•ro0 of too Wooly Rrto••1o0 ,/ L Mer 1 in0 Construction I '' I' 1 I t • I.bea__on S•r•io M.►•1•_a too mom!.r Act a t••.w•H of_Bwalo1f9[•1ST ..Ir_s_IA_ 6.1"A U111 Meat&SIIwI14S S 111pIM:MW IPMMIMM1 loc.,.E.Wino i111S__. 19911. - ieit3 7a•....we!out.••••T. WV 12D61 HSI 622E 9125 _�ti1 ALenue SPut i : ` M. Seattle. W . 98104 'j 't' _ • 'A a Sat, a. lYaS 1! �1 i iawH - 1W.r,NtH,.a��Nai-- 11t.1 '"' n ^--- lKING CO. . W`SHINGT('r; 1h..i: ♦F ie-.8• , 1••Too - - - - -- - • RECORD OF SURVEY 1 A PORTION OF THE E 1/2 OF SE 1/4 OF SEC . 14 , TWP . 23 N . , RGE . 4 E . , W .M . CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY , WASHINGTON \ A ..-FOCTH LINE•T►eR'r-nDhvEY,D TO '\ anew wflctat•0.•d to mew..., .-. :NARuET MONSTER.MA*M. 92. Description: ■Ip Cawaf•ecerdtwp ate egtt:e:.rt•, g•.� 16. \\ PARCEL 1R►VER.EF NAT•(4_Y MA4D'N ►M or PLAT ADAC C AH.1•0•NT, IMAM.'A• • ••• t CA 32 ;\ NENrr TC Te1E 4: 3flAr4 3A O �• .2 ')a Or LOT 32 Or THE •,N",ON ADD. //\ A trKI of land eCit0 In tots 24e. 28D :{ 17 )1 1. • •• • O N r.or04o•.11tlen to the City of Seattle. a o.dIng t-tat•o,et As g8•.20.0 O N'7 p\ egOord•d/n•else 12•r elate me i:. rec..ds 1 ding: vt. •' • 7 told cane,Det+q OOV,...ton tn.n°..n ee the no,.It,o.-...1 • I. • t$ ►Tl J Ai y • \ eoundeo on the west rod soutt•1gt by••1 W 1,•.e.0•••.1.1 .^, . . •. . N ... �L ? with and SO 0 feet dleteht we•leely. .ee red et•lgnt angle. e^ ✓ —1• sae 'OOr T��'• y 9�+ we: r \ rKlei lr fro.the e• �•' s�`�Q RQ%>w P•• •e.F( J3 / 00 Cowboy. es now contrvot•dlend 2Denttcr. and town...arty and n.•t .. `I h C�pN� { ®,°y. .9.ee ' �p ) r{gnt-of-fey ton•e•the evru"gton...the..R•Isro.d ce.3•n,et-.- N 4. d TB' ), �fy'f located eewerd on v,4 use by tee rnl•rly line o•cOnr•ty•o•+•. • ,S �a N �.F �, ♦ I�, \ 1•-21-e-I also eno n•e Steel.11. - Cne.1es mantle.Poe.0r••,• t,. . mane 2fv N N B7, CAUT.>N• .1v \� 1J ♦( \ t S a. ( Soutr, end erundeddon the na.tttttt R,tat•• •.lt II, Of des \•� • J• • 31 'SEE T.)NAIL ON ve ?• ... Jj.2� •�• \ Pln.P0•d.tot w•math•u hoer portly,astn..•c•t.y•o•+•._ . SKEET 1 FOR v° ° e,f• / ' 4. '( 4. 1.1d wets 200. 21•. 12.wed)) THIS AREAI O 9 �qp f ( O • Ysa,,'• I ~ 1,*,, ..s.. �4 \ (II thou Darts of Troet1 Tnlrtr-One 1111 end Tnlrtr-t.: is •• /. •y3�+ / N•/ • '` Q ' AINCtlon ROOl tlan to th City Of SO•ttl•. KCO,ONq to lh Olat t 4 e I I S7 ,/ �� ra:Ordfe In vela..12 01 Plato.D•q.!S, "'coeds 01 Ring County. .r_ 1,....:,... V/3r I / 19d•2j, v /' adder leadat anal Won,to„ta fan Q GQ✓M N M S•glnnlnq at the Ddint of tntvs•ct ion of the lr :•n. Y +.\TA T �t ,,��1I 1�1I I�tI M�/(�_ (� `�� `` County bee No 7e-))-e-1.en0un ea the fiat N111-Charles tans:e•oh T / /��Of tY.,-0J / \:/�/1+\+t`.+J :i`,. U\J `, ADM; )l� es oastrl08d:n the{Ceet•ln Quitclaim deed Ire.tat.0regnn•no.es t BUG- ���ttS5O('fP 4 J11 J Pulfoed Canoe.,to Wing County. Washington- dated Seote.eer is. 1;):n• - ►jLN L��i Ott° N►P p fB a'e ` / tat•lovtnee+.ante a^•or thee Dorton of tat.tract Thvtr-Leo u: �pACt13 ,/ Ct� S yEN �O I�e 91 J°dv.v\`y `` C, nor•t0for•Conroy.to CR•r:et NOmttr by Oreeo,.An.ue,Ingl>n /• \\ E / ? .. ` \ Co•Deny by deed oa{ed Junestem 10,1921. • ate^ R ,nr . 3 9 °J B 4 /` tnrnce soutn.•et•r lr.tang sef.tou{neeste•lr 1 r tat,: O71 // Of tact AL-t r-t.o en.of•ono same d to enfelt+wort Jr er ••.t. R R CO •Olsten.of e 0 bandana.ten 11101 feet. a 1.s. N ae.. ,p fo.tnweturly line o.sold Tract thirty too 1)l' .oleo t. .is,••. I> (a nortntostarlY tin.o1•platted street Ivor,.., In sold l IS O-.. . fie, C. e. / •9f•{ / `` .. \ O. JJ., `� Zt1T / `` tnrnce lnutntos•.•ly.long said nortnolter lr !I^• °st. ... ?f. 9e ,/ C till: s Street, t°the•0utnu•ct•rb an•of Steel Rut-tne•1es m• 4 [1Q f��°°JO°° / ,�/1, ~`'e' +•?4,•`.� thnc•northwesterly atonq w-a southwesterly tin.0•... ... 'qy• 7 20'SEWER EASEMENT J J� `t C"drat 000011r P°ed t°t"•point or e•otttn{n2 $'10e'N ON TEMPORARY f9 �GAe 5' '3 f. CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 'ote a wI'e '7j. j • REC.NO.860 9 2 41061 A, ` LEGEND: 0 100 200 'A�CInnt 'w _ -'BC NO 4 REE aN 1..'N R[' '- IA_G�A ` / \�x \ • 'BCE 22338' • '^ -7OT ha NAIL IN ASP•IGI+ e•'•• Ml. ••• ,• 4 C ?y ,Tel. C•O ` .'BCE 22338• SCALE : 1 " = 10 0 ' ..-,4„,‘,4.,R4. ',DJ° f `\ �frr .,-. ,:,"T y g0/7-v79 16 JJ F \ 4 O,I ,i. .y 1 \\ NS \/ / TEMPOR►RY CONSTRUCTION ,' •Pef LINE TABLE: . NOTE' •e'•J R\ -" \//Rf[E ON.6D92.IO61 .�rQ� •? A77 �� ' LINE WARN DISTANCE R `t y_ \ .\� J•- U N 2'lI'E1 I poll G TINE ESITEAS E SUBJECT TO TWO IS ` �Y \ B ` ` , U S...WOO E 40.21 SEWER EASEMENTS Or INDETERMINATE ^i ® `` U N T0.4a'Se.E S2.A FILED UNDER RECORDING No:S 5761139TION AS DESCRIBED IN 5t ♦ 4 a 'EtJM \\\ /•.TO T2 /� VACATED ROAD�,•l'3�'-_ EIt1Sl D,C L1 $17'57'07•[ 111.01 t S7WR0 \ A , 1 b \ \�•� ���'y . V •f BUILD NI• b E•S[IICNTBr AND RESERVATIONS TITL SNOW UPON T1R3 NIP 1� �•Jl0\ 'y',"4. 1 • ! CURVE TABLE: WERE RASED SOLELY UPON•TITLE REPORT DTHE C C T 00 •D2� \ nyr,,. 2 — , ��° W1ttt2tUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC.,BY THE L1L 1% J�v2• R \' \ °v ?•C �7 AND NO S,FURTHER RESEARCH BY BARGNA TITL CONSUL-N.�C ` CIAIv[ ARC DELTA RADIUS ENGINEERS,INC.HAS BEEN ATTEMPTED.ITITLE REPORT. H'c!'GO Cad•• 220 O \—���.� �2 R `` ` \ y\ Ci 2e.e0 5'13•5S• 2111.4i TITLE INSURANCE CCppMtCWpANY,DATED AUG.18,1989 't/!,�2Jeo O - ,',r-*ZJ•02• ` COMMITMENT NO.WADS.) f 0`' T —�, 33•BO�T`it .34124. .00 uh 1f tP34 14 30 R.7B8.03 As•Bu1LT_� / I MAIN LINE • `4 — e•a3d 0�./ I TACKS ^---=q IS�R1•i2 t•5 4 ►I 4 4 �►I:K`{+wet. /.�, RECORDING CERTIFICATE: LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: �1 Bar1gghheueen Engineers. Inc Ei/2 of SEil4 i4-23N-4E SH i Recording No. TRW r nerectlf h011ee00R{4 a nP•ef add•if 4 er awn aT .1't. . Consulting ES '3inr[�OP flied M record tell eh el Mq—t . directly.in Confiwe nCe allb th redufrly.nte of the Sreef I:,cRd/ate �•.` /e• •ll Eg i - _.R.le led.—et N.M.et edge—et tan mean et Mt et'ha r ONA a//tenth Censtrygllen CD. inc.In •.` lade q�leL IMwrYld t�lRey.lRl peetw.n Mer 11 no Construction On CG. +Z dada I.I. a_ - wA. f.�'• 1 i' tans Tad MYNA wan-wet.IA, W I2061 251-5222 9125 10th Avenue South I OF c��• k.• /` �A/r ra/MR• pipe fa Seattle. WA. 98104 .trey. �� Jell!2. teed '� 3143 _I `► t — teMPIAty.ey.lafhceNt 1I KING CO• . WASHINGTON ��� /Od!•9Dt t•.too' MAST RO.:as/a Ret • RECORD OF SURVEY A PORTION OF THE E 1/2 OF SE 1/4 OF SEC . 14 , TWP . 23 N . , RGE . 4 E . , W .M . CITY OF RENTON , KING COUNTY , WASHINGTON a • N 03'I9 24'• 9 o_A• 30.16 11011PORD i O.• 53.CAL .Lnr•N4LC Y0•RV•MELO _ N IV3A 04'• 163902 CaAT x.-\• u70.0•'PLAT VJT-7 - -.--,._. 7 __. __ _ ___ _ 2260:9_ N ,� 101.50'CALC. • i.• .2B T r 707000 PLAT•NELD �' I25.5!'►LAr ,„ 1/43.49'CALC.TROY o✓;r N f• NE-0 J.•\ ':% \ N 7 N.LINE o PLATI .o.i u 1350 LC4 ...AT '-90• , . . 3',, � ��3yr,969•��,9,ff•��I4[a9�9[.• y =/n} W NI A'NE.D • MI.•••L.M. J:>•:C T:ON ADC' •'ti, Nj• •�� ,ct `1 P1.47' 1 IX (,. L••4 W,5 5C• 5Nr 1 J • 09. f•\ 6r0 7"/ f,. o <. 7 tp L pj •6, e�C��6{' ��$z ►LATAi'Cf• v117Tr.•:•. N 60.20'36'E wC• i7' :Y� Y M•i`5 •Iq ty n . '77•IS 0i' 67.00 PLAT-NELD N '�,CS 0N O 'r ya .t 308,_ PLAT•NELD \ `\`�,;O pS•�C •i.`T6.•6J, s" i^' ��4�o a••L --•-.... \�NC C'..`,••. n• pp1�R TIO oi4• } fi'eS «ti1L z z st/ �tyaW�:/ �L. \ 0 .}S• ,\,'t[� I •Lai. 0' ® 1' 1..11:5•0t aIPi A: \UtegO 'iig° i c 1J© PLAT DIMENSION DETAIL (70/7 %';: n p®.i41 .7 N ti 6 G 7 7, 1.l-� 00014 lr:• 3\ •.0,• 4 Cg'tA( 60j<St..16 s ° Si o '• }'►•f, r '.12 o'S 0..•��,e�•<3�05< 1%4°' i v c.r H• 33• ° Saar <a rj4 D . s\ 1 I I C ..ag\\ � 'k \ � I 4 \ , o ZOO 400 I I SCALE s 20 7 0' • ' ••bOE.oe., RECORDING CERTIFICATE: LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: . eueefl E1/2 of SE1/4 14-23N-4E_ SHT Recording ea M,•••tr.,cUT n•r,twu.tares.nw so al,ar a■1.•an ```` !� Consulting Engineers.Inc. ' Pu,a.v r..,ut. .,.. ,M_,e._ •1..am 1•amw■:c,nt■t■e resuln•rau fungi Murat, / �.� 5• Mer l ino Construction Co. . Inc. 3 _..■.1•bM__,r hewn. „t,t a.r,•w,e.r.111'r^ /, �: Ir6 Ram n ...we 6�6t.11rrlr�m 12060• uP_—,t t••meant,r eat a iw1 1 . 1.2C5 7b„..,N„nun-um.u wnr f2o61 25f-6222 91z5 10Lh Avenue South °" E Lf0" 1.„ Morn NL r aw. -EOM)ev . Seattle. WA. 98104 OF ' a� '"`"36. till ' "" KING CO. , WASHINGTON 4 r—w AA,ryM,.:deC,.rco.m 1•ac,v�e MS - - - - - -• - - /,a6`- -W' i 02' 'FiS,t: w �.,,�sl - -•. - - - - - - _� RECORD OF SURVEY, A PORTION OF THE E J /2 OF SE 1/4 OF SEC . 14 , TWP . 23 N . , RGE . 4 E . , W . M . CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY , WASHINGTON \ \ ----- 3 2 \ N _-----..,.CAUTION, AREA Or 7RESCRIPTIVE R^-sr,FENCE 7 EASEMENT TO PUBLIC \ t \ "O>- Jel..� o • S1 ,CD 01 \ �cis ®� \ •tO n \r+\'7 1 *O' eso.>.CO,�� /.AT1� —� A a►IIRLE \ � 7O' EDGE OF LAIN 9 \ 4," _MINE ROA`� vs ^ \y/ll tO 7j"OS • 1 CHAIN LINK FENCE l' Q{'+ •�;. •. OF COUNTY USE _.� �31..87_r \\ J9.� s•,+, / / 7 22 1 A 'Q 1->i.' ` • . 1\�—EDGE OF EXISTING PAVEMENT `CAUTION. PRESCRIPTIVE" �� ~?� �J2 r •,• /� ' EASEMENT TO PUBLIC \v ?.a '�'``�� \ d' I VACATED ROAD ��J JD. J'P \ COy j, v.P•�?s. , / ' APPROX.LOCATION \J- \ 9so =� ' � MC� DO [� � D � o \\ dolk Tx\ 40.49 \ ...1-1-0S\ 3 l:J / 23. D APPROX.LIMY \ ''''' k /\c / JF COUNTY USE 0 roo ZOO / L[O[No: / N. (,� C ••'BCE 2233BpEBAR KITH RED PLASTIC CAP I \ 0 SCALE: 1" in 5O� \ 0• SET PK NAIL N ASPHALT•ITH WASHER / ��,. • "SCE zzsae• �j \ \ PARCEL / "A" EDGE E ISTNG \ PAVENENT LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE J \ \ LI N 03'19'24•R 40.21' L2 S 81E34.04"E 54.39' / CURVE TABLE CAUTION. CURVE ANC DELTA RAMS AREA OF PRESCRR'TIVE� CI 20 90' 513'55• 318 47• EASEMENT TO PUBLIC / / RECORDING CERTIFICATE: ' LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: � phaI$en E1/2 of SE1/4 14-23N-4E SHT RACOr01r10 NO _ _ TM.Nip err"tlr remnants•nenr••"by R�j�moor•4 F" h !A�. T r AP n1.e IA.r•te.e,Me _wr er g ,N_♦t__ etreftlen In co.rerynee qtn the r•peI/Hptyll the weer hen o t. > : 'f` ultinp Engineers. Inc. Mer 1 in0 COnst rUC t t„n !o I 4 I N In eoe•-_.er sin.,,,,„•t e•o. .,,n.r•N..,er Act•t IN Hewp el ,n r W.PUMA"SM•P►Iq A�IE�M woiRllAta Arson E urea. ;vl• —. IWp.r n • • MI5 Tam Anenvr Sent.•Vert Wel? 12061 251-6222 e I 4 T 9125 loth Avenue Four l• NI.rMH. Seattle. WA QP10 11f Jlrt. 1 1 'Whine s•p.rint.•..nt•,wer" — t�r•— KING CO. WASHING1Ui: i! " ♦♦ 00 V ;ITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Printed: 01-28-2002 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA02-013 Payment Made: 01/28/2002 04:16 PM Receipt Number: R0200452 Total Payment: 1,009.52 Payee: HALINEN LAW OFFICES Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 1,000.00 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 9.52 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check 10597 1, 000.00 Payment Check 7811 9.52 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee .00 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees .00 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers .00 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat .00 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees .00 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review .00 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat Q� .00 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat .00 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD .00 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees .00 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment ✓r '�v'j 14 .00 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks G4' 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone .00 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 04,r,D 4? .00 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev .00 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval ® .00 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Special Permit Fees .00 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees .00 5023 0 .00 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee .00 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend .00 5909 000.341. 60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies .00 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) .00 5954 604.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits .00 5955 000.05.519. 90.42.1 Postage .00 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax .00 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY ANMARCO PROPERTY BEACON COALMINE ROAD AND MONSTER ROAD RENTON,.WASHINGTON t. F E-9875 January 18, 2002 PREPARED FOR GARY MERLIN() CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. Mitchell G. McGinnis Project Geologist %AD A 'l 'N. �(� WAS • � I, l r de• /'�`` • �� • Raymond A. Coglas, P.E. Project Manager Expisa s 7 f )., z . Earth Consultants, Inc. 1805 - 136th Place Northeast, Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 (425) 643-3780 Toll Free 1-888-739-6670 - IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR i GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT I More construction problems are caused by site subsur- technical engineers who then render an opinion about face conditions than any other factor.As troublesome as overall subsurface conditions,.their likely reaction to subsurface problems can be,their frequency and extent proposed construction activity,and appropriate founda- have been lessened considerably in recent years,due in tion design. Even under optimal circumstances actual , large measure to programs and publications of ASFE/ conditions may differ from those inferred to exist, The Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in because no geotechnical engineer, no matter how the Geosciences. qualified,and no subsurface exploration program, no The following suggestions and observations are offered matter how comprehensive, can reveal what is hidden by to helpearth, rock and time.The actual interface between mate- you reduce the geotechnical-related delays, rials may be far more gradual or abrupt than a report cost-overruns and other costly headaches that can indicates.Actual conditions in areas not sampled may occur during a construction project. differ from predictions. Nothing can be done to prevent the unanticipated,but steps can be taken to help minimize their A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING impact. For this reason, most experienced owners retain their REPORT IS BASED ON A UNIQUE SET geotechnical consultants through the construction stage,to iden- tify variances,conduct additional tests which may be OF PROJECT-SPECIFIC FACTORS needed,and to recommend solutions to problems encountered on site. A geotechnical engineering report is based on a subsur- face exploration plan designed to incorporate a unique SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS set of project-specific factors. These typically include: the general nature of the structure involved, its size and CAN CHANGE configuration; the location of the structure on the site and its orientation; physical concomitants such as Subsurface conditions may be modified by constantly- access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities, changing natural forces. Because a geotechnical engi- and the level of additional risk which the client assumed neering report is based on conditions which existed at by virtue of limitations imposed upon the exploratory the time of subsurface exploration,construction decisions program.To help avoid costly problems, consult the should not be based on a geotechnical engineering report whose geotechnical engineer to determine how any factors adequacy may have been affected by time. Speak with the geo- which change subsequent to the date of the report may technical consultant to learn if additional tests are affect its recommendations. advisable before construction starts. Unless your consulting geotechnical engineer indicates Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and otherwise, your geotechnical engineering report should not natural events such as floods, earthquakes or ground- be used: water fluctuations may also affect subsurface conditions •When the nature of the proposed structure is and,thus, the continuing adequacy of a geotechnical changed, for example, if an office building will be report. The geotechnical engineer should be kept erected instead of a parking garage, or if a refriger apprised of any such events, and should be consulted to ' ated warehouse will be built instead of an unre- determine if additional tests are necessary. frigerated one; •when the size or configuration of the proposed GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE structure is altered; PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES •when the location or orientation of the proposed AND PERSONS structure is modified; •when there is a change of ownership, or Geotechnical engineers' reports are prepared to meet •for application to an adjacent site. the specific needs of specific individuals.A report pre- Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility for problems pared for a consulting civil engineer may not be ade- which may develop if they are not consulted after factors consid- quate for a construction contractor, or even some other ered in their report's development have changed. consulting civil engineer. Unless indicated otherwise, ' this report was prepared expressly for the client involved and expressly for purposes indicated by the client. Use MOST GEOTECHNICAL "FINDINGS" by any other persons for any purpose,or by the client ARE PROFESSIONAL ESTIMATES for a different purpose, may result in problems. No indi- vidual other than the client should apply this report for its Site exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions intended purpose without first conferring with the geotechnical only at those points where samples are taken,when engineer. No person should apply this report for any purpose they are taken. Data derived through sampling and sub- other than that originally contemplated without first conferring sequent laboratory testing are extrapolated by geo- with the geotechnical engineer. A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING der the mistaken impression that simply disclaiming re- REPORT IS SUBJECT TO sponsibility for the accuracy of subsurface information ; MISINTERPRETATION always insulates them from attendant liability. Providing the best available information to contractors helps pre- Costly problems can occur when other design profes- vent costly construction problems and the adversarial sionals develop their plans based on misinterpretations attitudes which aggravate them to disproportionate of a geotechnical engineering report.lb help avoid scale. these problems, the geotechnical engineer should be READ RESPONSIBILITY retained to work with other appropriate design profes- sionals to explain relevant geotechnical findings and to CLAUSES CLOSELY review the adequacy of their plans and specifications relative to geotechnical issues. Because geotechnical engineering is based extensively on judgment and opinion,it is far less exact than other design disciplines.This situation has resulted in wholly unwarranted daims being lodged against geotechnical BORING LOGS SHOULD NOT BE consultants.lb help prevent this problem,geotechnical engineers have developed model dauses for use in writ- SEPARATED FROM THE ten transmittals.These are not exculpatory dauses ENGINEERING REPORT designed to foist geotechnical engineers' liabilities onto J someone else. Rather, they are definitive dauses which Final boring logs are developed by geotechnical engi- identify where geotechnical engineers' responsibilities neers based upon their interpretation of field logs begin and end.Their use helps all parties involved rec- 1 (assembled by site personnel)and laboratory evaluation ognize their individual responsibilities and take appro- J of field samples.Only final boring logs customarily are priate action. Some of these definitive clauses are likely included in geotechnical engineering reports.These logs to appear in your geotechnical engineering report,and should not under any circumstances be redrawn for inclusion in you are encouraged to read them closely.Your geo- architectural or other design drawings, because drafters technical engineer will be pleased to give full and frank may commit errors or omissions in the transfer process. answers to your questions. Although photographic reproduction eliminates this problem,it does nothing to minimize the possibility of OTHER STEPS YOU CAN TAKE TO L contractors misinterpreting the logs during bid prepara- tion.When this occurs, delays,disputes and unantici- REDUCE RISK pated costs are the all-too-frequent result. Your consulting geotechnical engineer will be pleased to To minimize the likelihood of boring log misinterpreta- , discuss other techniques which can be employed to mit- tion,give contractors ready access to the complete geotechnical igate risk. in addition,ASFE has developed a variety of engineering report prepared or authorized for their use. materials which may be beneficial.Contact ASFE for a - Those who do not provide such access may proceed un- complimentary copy of its publications directory. I 1 i� 1. il Published by , ASFE THE ASSOCIATION OF ENGINEERING FIRMS PRACTICING IN THE GEOSCIENCES P 8811 Colesville Road/Suite G 106/Silver Spring, Maryland 20910/(301) 565-2733 i 71 0788/3M rile 44\ �,����, Earth Consultants Inc. Geotechnical Engineers,Geologists&Environmental Scientists I January 18, 2002 E-9875 Gary Merlino Construction Co., Inc. 9125 - 10th South Seattle, Washington 98109 Attention: Mr. Gary Merlino Dear Mr. Merlino: We are pleased to submit our report entitled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, AnMarCo Property, Beacon Coal Mine Road and Monster Road, Renton, Washington". This report presents the results of our field exploration, selective laboratory tests, and engineering analyses. The attached study provides a summary of our field exploration, site observations, engineering analyses and recommendations for accomplishing the planned grading and supporting the west side of the proposed gravel parking area. We appreciate this opportunity to have been of service to you. If you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please call. Respectfully submitted, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. Scott Dinkelman, CEG Associate Engineering Geologist MGM/SDD/RAC/jme Earth Consultants, Inc. 1805-136th Place N.E.,Suite 201,Bellevue,Washington 98005 Bellevue(425)643-3780 FAX(425)746-0860 Toll Free(888)739-6670 TABLE OF CONTENTS E-9875 PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 General 1 Project Description 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 Surface 2 Subsurface 3 Existing Modular Block Wall 5 Groundwater 5 Laboratory Testing 6 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6 General 6 Modular Block Wall 7 Excavations and Slopes 7 Site Preparation and General Earthwork 8 Seismic Design Considerations 10 LIMITATIONS 11 Additional Services 11 Earth Consultants, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS, Continued E-9875 APPENDICES Appendix A Field Exploration Appendix B Laboratory Test Results ILLUSTRATIONS Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Test Pit Location Plan Plate 3 Three Block Wall Configuration Plate A 1 Legend Plates A2 through A9 Test Pit Logs Plate B1 Grain Size Analyses Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY ANMARCO PROPERTY BEACON COAL MINE ROAD AND MONSTER ROAD RENTON, WASHINGTON E-9875 INTRODUCTION General This report presents the results of the geotechnical engineering study completed by Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) for the AnMarCo Property, Beacon Coal Mine Road and Monster Road, Renton, Washington. The general location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1 . The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface conditions in the area of the west-facing slope along the west side of Beacon Coal Mine Road, and to provide specific geotechnical engineering recommendations for the earthwork and proposed modification of an existing modular block wall along the west side of the site. Project Description We understand that you plan to regrade a portion of the existing commercial property west of the intersection of Beacon Coal Mine Road and Monster Road for construction of a gravel parking and storage area. At the time that our study was performed, the site, existing structures, and our exploration locations were approximately as shown on the Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 2. Based on preliminary design information, cuts on the order of two (2) to twelve (12) feet will be required to reach proposed finished grade within the limits of the planned gravel parking area. Two to four feet of fill will be required to reach finished grades in the southcentral and western portions of the site. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 2 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002 The immediate eastern portion of the proposed parking area will be bounded to the east by an approximately twelve (12) to sixteen (16) foot high southwest and west-facing cut slope. The proposed cut slope will extend up from the parking area to the western shoulder of Beacon Coal Mine Road at 2H:1V (Horizontal to Vertical). The proposed parking area will extend from approximately one hundred (100) to two hundred fifty (250) feet in an east-west direction from the toe of slope to the west side of the development area at a gradient of 5 percent or less. The western limits of the planned parking area will be supported by an approximately four hundred thirty (430) foot long, nine foot high modular ("ecology") block wall. The proposed wall is to be constructed along the same alignment as a six foot high block wall that currently exists along the western limits of the proposed parking area. The height of the wall along the current wall alignment will be increased to nine feet by adding an additional level of blocks along the entire length of the existing wall. Up to four feet of fill will be placed behind the wall in the immediate southeastern portion of the proposed grading area. The conclusions and recommendations in this study are based on our understanding of the proposed improvements which are based on the project information provided us. If the above project description is incorrect or the project information changes, we should be consulted to review the recommendations contained in this study and make modifications, if needed. SITE CONDITIONS Surface The subject site consists of an irregularly-shaped, industrially-zoned property located immediately west of the intersection of Beacon Coal Mine Road and Monster Road in Renton (see Plate 1, Vicinity Map). The planned development area extends (a) approximately two hundred (200) to two hundred and fifty (250) feet in an east-west direction from the west side of Beacon Coal Mine Road to an existing gravel road within the western portion of the site and (b) approximately six hundred (600) feet in a north- south direction from an asphalt paved access road on the south side of the site north to Beacon Mine Road on the north side of the site. The overall topography of the site slopes to the west-southwest at gradients ranging from nearly level to approximately 80 percent. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 3 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002 The northwestern portion of the planned development area consists of a relatively level bench approximately three hundred and sixty (360) foot long (north-south) and twenty (20) to one hundred and twenty (120) feet wide (east-west). The east side of the bench is bounded by a four to twelve (12) foot high south-southwest facing slope that extends up to Beacon Coal Mine Road. The western side of the bench consists of an approximately ten (10) foot high southwest facing slope that descends to a gravel storage area at gradients on the order of 40 to 80 percent. The benched portion of the site is currently undeveloped. The southern and western portions of the site consist of a relatively-level, gravel-covered parking and storage area. The topography within this area slopes gradually to the south- southwest at gradients of typically 10 percent or less. The northwestern portion of the planned development area contains a twenty (20) foot high southwest facing excavated slope that extends down to an existing detention pond at gradients of approximately 40 to 80 percent. The western and southern portions of the site are covered by gravel. The bench area in the northeastern portion of the planned development area is vegetated by localized small to medium diameter trees with a dense understory of blackberry bushes and miscellaneous brush. Subsurface Subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating eight test pits in the vicinity of the proposed cut slope adjacent to Beacon Coal Mine Road. The approximate locations of our test pits are shown on Plate 2. Please refer to the Test Pits Logs, Plates A2 through A9, for a detailed description of the conditions encountered at each location explored. A description of the field exploration methods is included in Appendix A. The following is a generalized description of the subsurface conditions encountered. At our test pit locations, we encountered a surficial layer of topsoil and duff. The topsoil and duff layer was typically six (6) to twelve (12) inches thick with localized areas up to eighteen (18) inches thick as encountered in Test Pits TP-4 and TP-8. The topsoil was characterized by its dark brown color, loose consistency, and the presence of abundant roots and organic debris. The topsoil is not suitable for support of the proposed modular block wall, and should not be used as structural fill. • Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 4 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002 Underlying the topsoil at six of our eight test pit locations, we encountered two and one half to six feet of fill. The fill consists of loose to medium dense silty sand (Unified Soil Classification, SM) and sandy silt (ML) with varying amounts of gravel. The fill soils are similar in appearance to the underlying native soils but are characterized by their loose consistency and disturbed appearance. Underlying the fill at two of our test pit locations, we encountered a layer of what appears to be an old slope wash deposit. In Test Pits TP-1 and TP-2 in the southern portion of the exploration area, we encountered seven to seven and one half feet of medium dense silty sand (SM) with varying amounts of gravel, cobbles, and occasional boulders. The gravel and cobbles were comprised primarily of weathered, subangular to subrounded igneous rocks. Underlying the topsoil, duff, and fill in Test Pits TP-3, TP-4, TP-5, and TP-6 we encountered four and one half feet of medium dense to dense silt (ML). The silt encountered in Test Pits TP-3, TP-4, and TP-5 was massive to thinly laminated. The silt encountered in Test Pit TP-6 consisted of highly weathered medium dense silt with no apparent lamina. At all of our test pit locations we encountered a layer of weathered to unweathered glacial till to a maximum depth of sixteen and one half (16.5) feet below existing grade. The glacial till was encountered underlying fill, slope wash, laminated silt, or directly underlying the topsoil and duff depending on the location of the excavation. At our test pit locations, the till consisted of medium dense to very dense silty sand with varying amounts of gravel. The glacial till typically became dense to very dense at depths ranging from twelve and one half (12.5) to sixteen (16) feet below grade. Underlying the glacial till in Test Pits TP-3 and TP-8, we encountered highly fractured weathered bedrock of what is likely the Tukwila Formation (Map Unit Tt). The bedrock was encountered at ten and one half (10.5) feet below grade in Test Pit TP-8 and at fifteen (15) feet below grade in Test Pit TP-3. At both of the locations, we encountered refusal and only a small amount of the rock was recovered from the excavation. The samples recovered appeared to be comprised of highly weathered sandstone/conglomerate with igneous derived clasts consistent with those defined in the Tukwila Formation. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 5 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002 Existing Modular (Ecology) Block Wall As part of our study, we reviewed the condition of the existing modular block wall on the west side of the site. It is planned to increase the height of the west wall by three feet. The immediate western limit of the proposed parking area is supported by an existing modular block wall situated on a relatively level bench currently being used as a container storage area. The existing wall consists of an approximately four hundred thirty (430) foot long wall constructed of 3-foot wide by 3-foot thick by 6-foot long concrete blocks. The wall consists of two courses of blocks with the base course embedded approximately four to six inches below grade. At several locations along the wall, we observed two to four inch gaps between the individual blocks and sections where the upper course of blocks has rotated over the edge of the base course. During our reconnaissance, we did not observe indications of free draining gravel or a drain pipe behind the existing wall. In our opinion, portions of the existing wall may need to be dismantled and re-aligned prior to placement of the additional row of blocks. Groundwater Light to moderate groundwater seepage was encountered at twelve (12) feet below grade in Test Pit TP-1 . In addition, mottled soils and increased soil moisture were encountered at widely varying depths throughout the site. The observed seepage, mottling, and increased soil moisture appear to be indicative of a perched groundwater condition. Based on the observed soil and groundwater conditions at our test pit locations, it is possible groundwater seepage will be encountered in site excavations depending on the time of year the grading is conducted. The contractor should be aware that groundwater is not static. There will be fluctuations in the level depending on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other factors. Generally, the water level is higher and seepage rate is greater in the wetter winter months. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 6 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002 Laboratory Testing Laboratory tests were conducted on several representative soil samples to verify or modify the field soil classification and to evaluate the general physical properties and engineering characteristics of the soil encountered. Visual field classifications were supplemented by grain size analyses on representative soil samples. Moisture content tests were performed on all samples. The results of laboratory tests performed on specific samples are provided either at the appropriate sample depth on the individual test pit logs or on a separate data sheet contained in Appendix B. It is important to note that these test results may not accurately represent the overall in-situ soil conditions. Our geotechnical recommendations are based on our interpretation of these test results and their use in guiding our engineering judgment. ECI cannot be responsible for the interpretation of these data by others. In accordance with our Standard Fee Schedule and General Conditions, the soil samples for this project will be discarded after a period of fifteen (15) days following completion of this report unless we are otherwise directed in writing. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on the results of our study, in our opinion the proposed improvements can be completed generally as planned. Our test pits indicate the eastern limit of the planned development area is underlain by loose fill overlying loose to very dense native soil and weathered bedrock. In our opinion this area can be regraded to a permanent gradient of 2H:1V. In our opinion, the existing modular block wall can be raised to a maximum height of nine feet provided (a) drainage is installed behind the wall, (b) the existing blocks that have rotated are straightened, and (c) the base course of blocks is embedded by placing twelve (12) inches of structural fill in front of the wall. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 7 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002 This report has been prepared for specific application to this project only and in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area for the exclusive use of Gary Merlino Construction Co. Inc. and AnMarCo and their respective representatives. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This report, in its entirety, should be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. Modular Block Wall In order to achieve final grades, it is planned to increase the height of the modular block wall on the west side of the site. The existing wall is constructed of solid concrete blocks measuring about three feet high, three feet deep, and six feet long. The existing wall is two courses high -- about six feet. The height of the wall will be increased by one block, resulting in a final wall height of nine feet. ', As part of our field exploration, we observed the condition of the existing wall. The existing wall was constructed vertically. In some areas, we observed the wall has rotated beyond vertical. The base course of the blocks was observed to be embedded four to six inches into the ground. During our review, we did not observe indications of free draining gravel or a drain pipe behind the wall. In our opinion, the height of the existing wall can be increased generally as planned. However, where the existing wall has rotated, the existing blocks should be pushed into a vertical position. A drainage zone should also be installed behind the existing and new portions of the wall. At a minimum, the drainage zone should consist of an eighteen (18) inch wide layer of free draining rock placed at the full height of the wall. A four inch diameter perforated collector pipe should be installed at the base of the drain rock. The collector pipe should consist of rigid PVC. We do not recommend using corrugated plastic pipe. The drain rock should consist of pea gravel or washed rock. The base course of blocks should also be embedded at least twelve (12) inches below finished grade. This can be accomplished by placing an additional six to eight inches of structural fill in front of the existing wall. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 8 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002 Please refer to Plate 3 (Three Block Wall Configuration) for a schematic drawing of the wall and drainage configuration. Excavations and Slopes The following information is provided solely as a service to our client. Under no circumstances should this information be interpreted to mean that ECI is assuming responsibility for construction site safety or the Contractor's activities; such responsibility is not being implied and should not be inferred. The inclination of temporary slopes is dependent on several variables, including the height of the cut, the soil type and density, the presence of groundwater seepage, construction timing, weather, and surcharge loads from adjacent structures, roads and equipment. In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state (WISHA), and Federal (OSHA) safety regulations. Based on the information obtained from our field exploration and laboratory testing, in our opinion the upper loose to medium dense fill and native soils would be classified as Type C by OSHA/WISHA. Temporary cuts greater than four feet in height in Type C soils should be sloped at an inclination of 1 .5H:1 V. The underlying dense to very dense native soil and weathered bedrock would be classified as Type A by OSHA/WISHA. Temporary cuts greater than four feet in height in Type A soils may be sloped at an inclination of 0.75H:1 V. The lower four feet of temporary cuts a Type A soils may be cut vertically. Because of the many variables involved, the inclination of temporary excavation slopes should be evaluated during construction, as the actual soil conditions become more apparent. ECI should be on-site to observe the excavations and to assess the soil conditions exposed in the excavation. If during construction, slopes of this inclination, or flatter, cannot be constructed, temporary shoring may be necessary. Shoring will help protect against slope or excavation collapse, and will provide protection to workers in the excavation. If temporary shoring is needed, we can provide shoring design criteria. Earth Consultants, Inc. I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 9 , Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002 Permanent cut and fill slopes should be inclined no steeper than 2H:1V. Cut slopes should be observed by ECI during excavation to verify that conditions are as anticipated. Supplementary recommendations can then be developed, if needed, to improve stability, including flattening of slopes or installation of surface or subsurface drains. Due to the presence of bedrock observed at some of the test pits, difficult digging conditions may be encountered along the proposed cut slope. Permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. Site Preparation and General Earthwork The proposed development area should be stripped and cleared of all topsoil, vegetation, duff, or other organic or deleterious material. A representative from ECI should observe the prepared subgrade. Existing utility pipes, that will be abandoned should be plugged or removed so they do not provide a conduit for water and cause stability problems. Following the stripping operation and excavations necessary to reach construction subgrade elevations, the ground surface where structural fill, foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be placed should be observed by an ECI representative. Proofrolling may be necessary to identify soft or unstable areas. Proofrolling should be performed under the observation of a representative of ECI. Soil in loose or soft areas, if recompacted and still excessively yielding, should be overexcavated and replaced with structural fill to a depth that will provide a stable base beneath the general structural fill. The optional use of a geotextile fabric placed directly on the overexcavated surface may help to bridge unstable areas. Structural fill is defined as compacted fill placed under load-bearing areas. Structural fill under footings or the modular block walls should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding twelve (12) inches in loose thickness and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of its laboratory maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-91 (Modified Proctor). The fill materials should be placed at or near their optimum moisture content. Fill under pavements and walks should also be placed in horizontal lifts and compacted to 90 percent of maximum dry density except for the top twelve (12) inches, which should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum dry density. Earth Consultants, Inc. L GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 11 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002 Liquefaction: Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which soils lose all shear strength for short periods of time during an earthquake. Groundshaking of sufficient duration results in the loss of grain to grain contact and rapid increase in pore water pressure, causing the soil to behave as a fluid. To have a potential for liquefaction, a soil must be cohesionless with a grain size distribution of a specified range (generally sand and silt); it must be loose; it must be below the groundwater table; and it must be subject to sufficient magnitude and duration of groundshaking. The effects of liquefaction may be large total and/or differential settlement for structures founded in the liquefying soils. In our opinion, the potential for liquefaction induced settlement of the medium dense to very dense soils encountered at this site should be negligible provided that the recommendations contained in our report are followed. Ground Motion Response: The 1997 UBC seismic design section provides a series of soil types that are used as a basis for seismic design of structures. Based on the encountered soil conditions, it is our opinion that soil type Sc, Very Dense Soil and Soft Rock from Table 16-J should be used for design. LIMITATIONS Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses, the design information provided us, and our experience and engineering judgment. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No warranty is expressed or implied. The recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the test pits. Soil and groundwater conditions between test pits may vary from those encountered. The nature and extent of variations between our exploratory locations may not become evident until construction. If variations do appear, ECI should be requested to reevaluate the recommendations of this report and to modify or verify them in writing prior to proceeding with the construction. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 12 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002 Additional Services As the geotechnical engineer of record, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design and specifications to verify that the earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and in the construction specifications. ECI should also be retained to provide geotechnical services during construction. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. We do not accept responsibility for the performance of foundations or earthwork unless we are retained to review the construction drawings and specifications, and to provide construction observation and testing services. Earth Consultants, Inc. 'c• ‘1 ••'-'`A, • 14 e ii" ...it.. .... .........., =, i at.AL, 4749 . . ..'...- .5 ,,,.. ..,,,„..s.„ ,., 1STIg b I '' a ' 14 ik:,..\. _,. 4, TVSILN -- , =tB LAC -: „..... ,,_ s•••••Ft IF R 1 g.) ..... .„,- ;.. ,. ..r.; 'Pe, ' • , ' ,'a.,y .'..'VI,, . g...13071-1 VETS " Off:till • trp ,• d. - -. „ T "-' Li11 -: ". 5,- '' 4h6 II0 ..: pli • , c. • 1- &AV RIM :: . c" _ .: ; re- 11 r._ ,- .* i ._, 51 ,:z' L424) .1.7 '''.. ••••', .f 44, ,. , 9, ,..- f051E17 . PfI9 :: m• -- y. • '. 5 s 144 144r: s r e.. .., - • L.,- ,s- mT}i ill --.—L......L. S 1‘ 144,TF Le, L irs :: ' ' - 3°9 . - *7tR LI kil‘TEO _ 1 N .- ' ..-1 ......1, = . , .. . , 14:110. liti• 4 tf: 3 it., •21:Likr t. .' '.. • „.11 t 1 •'..ifi ;."- -•'•:, _ ,,,,.. N' TUICN I LA1' ..\\ , 1.1„ri) , ,31 r': -+,..roRT N,6),% .,.....: ,,t , ee ' NTOlq. ,, .....,_ _ .. „...., 4. vrIrr ..• •,. c,r1,11 y,-. . S Ltirm cr iscli .. i ,...g. . , ST _.,.... 1531.1 ST i.t.,4 r- !,'2SORI 325 •1 •,%C 42,1).,........ -79 6-1 .> 24 i...4. i .,, :',!•,,,.. •ic fi ....; 21 "/ 1:sr .,' ."--,-. ,_,-- -- .., T, 10 RN DN \,,s,,,,_ ,f 'I 1 iti..i: ". ,1;.'. '' '''‘• "14114, • 4->' N. 2 It '''' . 4' N-• ;""I's... ttett! -....,_ rA w- Li.' 'in'.... kit 4gr ..•''. .., •24 ,. ,r liti . ..# _.,,,,c*,---, . AUllikih., vz *.._irr..11-A ..--00--- --r" _- ',. fltr, , - - -:. B6rie v CES9 \VII116" - • '0"...c,' '61 .-400011"----- 1 • : ,-. -.., 87, .,_ -.,.. - .„-• a : 1 w . --'-,.. 4,- •_,....4 "- 1 77' 4 • ` GWRAL;. -^Iff.N11111.i 1.. J til4"1„A -,/ 7 SORDOSS.." -"lif ,..h P"11.- MilMairfF 4 ' •• Si''' orircir': '' L i 1 ILVIS WM Iii. g tti V I 0 —---- 5 — i 76 Ili FMK 1 S'ltinfa 5T :_!'. ,4; mn 0 I eLVI) c., •!.:. 4 ii ?-.,.. . sr los • I•1),i 0 . 4 #4.• 4.., ...sc 21 i. 1 ...,04.,,,kplut 417 ,...1 J4.2_7.,,,,,-; ... . r _ Ft. . 8LVD1! c'—'-... ''':"-'''''i±:. ri 11 sT __ _ _:2- ,34 Y/16ani ssTurn, 1./1. IA I 4.4 I 17,1TH 15 , sy --- A S \ '...) r r =in, . . 57010E•R 9 I 1., ••. , II ONAPIES ,SapTNEVT '‘a far... 1.--.--.--...., N....• 1 i. e is (t2 SWIM ,1 26 MIME' = x ) ,,, = i LK • I '', • NTON RA/A r—a--f % \- .7 t NC T I ON er romuri 8 : /4), / •,..y. - , X 40.4r : ffirrrIV 26 , _ . _ ____.,. - ,.., :s :t..i. "'' LI : 'a - MUM I *MAW r Ali /fits,i Reference: Puget Sound Area 4111(1.0-#d) EarthechnicEn rs,Consultants,logists,Enonrnen,Inc. Scientists King County/Map 655 By Thomas Brothers Maps Vicinity Map Dated 2002 AnMarCo Property Renton, Washington NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color. ECI cannot be responsible for any subsequent Drwn. GLS Date Sept. 2001 Proj. No. 9875 misinterpretation of the information resulting from black&white reproductions of this plate. Checked MGM Date 9/24/01 Plate 1 Proposed Access MONSTER ROAD Road ' 70 '— �`e >� Approximate Scale Top of 2:1 Slope _ ;;;%% -�,, ,� ' c 0 40 80 160ft. _ - - TPA'+'_,,,-_i_ " ... , / 0 _ _ _ - _�s '`=;; '� DTP-1 \"����s. o LEGEND / % - _ E i r/. / _ / s-------------- -- TP-1 -•-Approximate Location of ,, P `- Existing ECI Test Pit, Proj. No. / • 0 g ,, Asphalt Paving E-9875, Sept. 2001 ----------------------- ---------- — /' -- 40 ' Subject Site citf --______________ --- ' ' ' ' Existing Ecology Block / Wall / ___--4o----_ �I �O _ ��i _ r Limits ofCons ruc ion r ExistingTopography �� L' t _ = 1 - 'n /47.. / ,�,,/, t-\ f Cell1 �� ri . I Existing ,- ` Proposed Finish Grade 120 34/If i��J 1_,1- '` . OW. .-."-• Ecology Block Wall 32/ 1lot , `t24 Gravel Dnv� . �l co rein ll1l .. �'— . unit of Construction 111,1 Existing 30 \�% \2 �iIL=1j`1 20 ` Asphalt Paving - - - - Or;L , i Existing — _ _ — \ `.' ; Ecology Block Wall _ — - - ` _ _ - - Earth Consultants, Inc. (064 (ii-O ���� lI�/ Geotechnical Engineers.Geologists 8 Environmental scientists NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color. ECI cannot Test Pit Location Plan be responsible for any subsequent misinterpretation of AnMarCo Property the information resulting from black& white reproductions Renton, Washington of this plate. Drwn. GLS Date Nov. 2001 Proj. No. 9875 Checked MGM Date 11/29/01 Plate 2 Modular Block Wall 3H x 3W x 6L Storage Surcharge (Typical) 100psf WVVA 11E111E111E111 III— — ia°o Ion Fo a 18" Min. 1°ifeo Free Draining Backfill I'° °°°e 0 0° lo°°°C ho° °i 8' I' o og� loo 10c, °O 0° ° I,° °°°c Coo c lo°°° d oc I) ly o o c Mirafi 140N ►I'°ot°° �.o. .� V tr 1' Min. 111EI II-111E111 Embedment Depth I 1 I— = 4 Diameter . :• • Rigid Perforated PVC Drain Surround with 1 Cubic Foot Per Lineal Foot Pea Gravel SCHEMATIC ONLY-NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING 40;4)(1-dik!",/j) Earth Consultants, Inc. Geotechnical Engineers.Geologists&Environmental Scientists r Three Block Wall Configuration AnMarCo Property Renton, Washington Drwn. GLS Date Nov. 2001 Proj. No. 9875 Checked MGM Date 11/29/01 Plate 3 A • P E D P !„! A f I e -)( A . APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION E-9875 Our field exploration was performed on September 13, 2001 . Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by excavating eight test pits in the vicinity of Beacon Coal Mine Road. The test pits were excavated using an excavator provided by the client. 1 I Approximate test pit locations were estimated by pacing from site features depicted on the site plan provided by the client. The locations and elevations of the test pits should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. These approximate locations are shown on the Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration was continuously monitored by a geologist from our firm who classified the soils encountered, maintained a log of each test pit, obtained representative samples, measured groundwater levels, and observed pertinent site features. The samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, which is presented on Plate Al, Legend. Representative soil samples were collected and returned to our laboratory for further examination and testing. Logs of our test pits are included as Plates A2 through A9. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and the results of the laboratory examination and tests of field samples. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. In actuality, the transitions may be more gradual. Earth Consultants, Inc. • MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAPH LETTER TYPICAL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL SYMBOL (a C? C21 ( GW Well-Graded Gravels, Gravel-Sand Gravel \Q •4 •0 • gw Mixtures, Little Or No Fines And Clean Gravels 1 n n n Gravelly (little or no fines) 111, ` ` Gp Poorly-Graded Gravels,Gravel- Coarse Soils 1 . 1 . 1 . Grained gp Sand Mixtures,Little Or No Fines Soils More Than GM Silty Gravels,Gravel-Sand- 50"/ Coarse Gravels With � I gm Silt Mixtures Fraction Fines(appreciable II !!! Retained On amount of fines) • GC# # # Clayey Gravels,Gravel-Sand- No.4 Sieve k gc Clay Mixtu re s Sand o ' SW Well-Graded Sands, Gravelly And Clean Sand ' o,p e o SW Sands, Little Or No Fines Sandy (little or no fines) ".*:?j;1 ;#..+. SP Poorly Graded Sands, Gravelly More Than Soils "`pi#az: S Sands, Little Or No Fines 50% Material p Larger Than More Than • No.200 Sieve 50% Coarse SM Silty Sands, Sand-Silt Mixtures Size Fraction Sands With Sm Fines(appreciable ,..:.; PassiSieveng No.4 amount of fines) SC SC Clayey Sands, Sand Clay Mixtures ML Inorganic Silts&Very Fine Sands,Rock FIoIrSilty- rpl Clayey Fine Sands;Clayey Silts w/Slight Plasticity Fine Silts Liquid Limit Inorganic Clays Of Low To Medium Plasticity, Grained And Less Than 50 / CL CI Gravelly Clays, Sandy Clays, Silty Clays, Lean Soils Clays I II I Organic Silts And Organic I !II !I I I! OL 01 Silty Clays Of Low Plasticity • MH Inorganic Silts, Micaceous Or Diatomaceous Fine More Than mh Sand Or Silty Soils 50% Material Silts Liquid Limit Smaller Than And CH Inorganic Clays Of High No.200 Sieve Clays Greater Than 50 Ch Plasticity, Fat Clays. Size / OH •Organic Clays Of Medium To'High l j , / Oh Plasticity, Organic Silts `�1� IAA d PT Peat, Humus, Swamp Soils Highly Organic Soils 4 ``,� i i, `‘i, pt With High Organic Contents Topsoil 'y y y y Humus And Duff Layer Fill •�•�•�•�•�•• Hlyhly Variable Constituents • The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the material presented in the attached logs. DUAL SYMBOLS are used to indicate borderline soil classification. C TORVANE READING,tsf I 2"O.D. SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER qu PENETROMETER READING,tsf W MOISTURE, %dry weight I{ 24"I.D. RING OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER P SAMPLER PUSHED * SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED i WATER OBSERVATION WELL pcf DRY DENSITY,lbs.per cubic ft. LL LIQUID LIMIT,% 2 DEPTH OF ENCOUNTERED GROUNDWATER PI PLASTIC INDEX DURING EXCAVATION Z SUBSEQUENT GROUNDWATER LEVEL W/DATE (i'„; ('..4-, LEGEND i �j11,1 Earth Consultants Inc.(i o5slmiwl&sighus;rs,(Kx)lugisls&envIn)1i nv ilul&IC:JA is • • . Proj. No. 9875 !Date Oct.01' 1P1te Al Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of AnMarCo Property 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9875 MGM 9/13/01 TP-1 Excavation Contactor. Ground Surface Elevation: Client 50' Notes: • ' — Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil &Duff 4"-6" 2 -6 General W 7. 2 2 Notes (%) CD 0 0 0 • • • •• SM Dark brown silty SAND with gravel, loose, moist(Possible Fill)• ••-• ,•,•• -•-•-• I ••• — • • 2 — •• •-•-• ••-• •••• • 3 — •-•• -35%fines 13.0 •Y•• ••-• ••• 4 ••-• • • • • ++-• ••-• 5 SM Reddish brown silty SAND, medium dense, moist(Possible Slope 6 Wash) 7 -contains gravel -trace boulders 8 9 11 12 — -light ot moderate seepage at 12', becomes wet 13 — SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense to dense,wet 14 — 16.4 15 — 16 -becomes dense Test pit terminated at 16.5 feet below existing grade. Perched groundwater seepage encountered at 12.0 feet during ocavation. NOTE: Test pit elevations based on topography shown on Site Plan dated 6/3/2001. w - a_ Test Pit Log .. r 110( 41/0410 Earth Consultants Inc. AnMarCo Property N‘i I Nlof\‘ici Q-A-gamma-al EnsgInfx-is.CA:NNW&&Frivtronmental Sclenttqs Renton,Washington a. 1 ta Prq.No. 9875 Dwn. GLS Date Oct.2001 Checked MGM Date 10/3/01 Plate A2 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of infnrrnefinn new:tea:m.0A nn flue Inn Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of AnMarCo Property 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9875 MGM 9/13/01 TP-2 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: Client 50' Notes: Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil &Duff 4"-6" s2 -5 Cf) General W :c .a E E E Notes (%) cri 0 IA >. •-•• SM Dark brown silty SAND, loose, moist(Possible Fill) •-•-• ••-• •••• 1 - • * ••• — w• 2 • SM Reddish brown silty SAND, medium dense, moist(Possible Slope • 3 Wash) , :• 4 — -trace cobbles and boulders • 5 — :•: 6 • : 7 — 9.6 8 — • • g - SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense,wet io :•:• — it — 19.4 12 I •• •• 13 -becomes blue gray,dense Test pit terminated at 13.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. 0 I a /07 Ii44‘ Test Pit Log , '1 083 dill( vi,111) Earth Consultants Inc. AnMarCo Property o N11 el \Ai OteChnIC F.ngtneas,GcologIsts&FrivironmentaI Scientists Renton,Washington O. Proj.No. 9875 Dwn. GLS Date Oct.2001 Checked MGM Date 10/3/01 Plate A3 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of ; .nfnrmefinn nnaennfael nn*hie Inn • Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of AnMarCo Property 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9875 MGM 9/13/01 TP-3 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: Client 55' _ Notes: o m o Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil&Duff 12" General W t .o fl n c m E aai ii E 6 E Notes (/o) p rm v y W, TPSL TOPSOIL and DUFF • i� 1 SM Reddish brown silty SAND, loose, moist(Possible Fill) 1 �•••• 2 18.4 .HH 3 — 4 ML Brown SILT, medium dense to dense, moist ! 5 -laminated 39.9 6 -blocky I 7 8 SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist i 9 10 =., 11 — ' 12 1 = 13 I 14 7.9 a • 15 TUKINILA FORMATION (Tt): Brown SANDSTONE/ \CONGLOMERATE highly weathered, highly fractured, moderately _ , \hard / Test pit terminated at 15.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Is I 0 0. U w a id ,•«os.. pl• 441‘. Test Pit Log as Earth Consultants Inc. <<�0 \up y✓tigf AnMarCo Property J \I J\ \ G CmlcalFnginr«is Ciologlst.&Fnvlmnnxnial5cicnfls Renton,Washington ' a F' Proj.No. 9875 Dwn. GLS Date Oct.2001 Checked MGM Date 10/3/01 Plate A4 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and , judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of ,nfnrmn+inn nracon4arl nn*tie Inn Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of AnMarCo Property 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9875 'MGM 9/13/01 TP-4 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: Client 55' Notes: o L „ — Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil&Duff 18"co o General W _ Notes (°/,) o `� al �co con ,t,W TPSL TOPSOIL and DUFF 2 — ML Reddish brown sandy SILT, medium dense, moist(Possible Fill) 25.2 3 -trace small gravel 4 ML Brown SILT, medium dense to dense, moist 32.5 5 6 -laminated -blocky 7 8 - 9 SM Reddish brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist 12.9 10 — 11 -- -27%fines _ 12 — 13 6 14 -becomes dense 13.4 15 — 16 -becomes blue gray Test pit terminated at 16.0 feet below e)asting grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. 0. U W •AP-. Test Pit Log W ■■r �� / Earth Consultants Inc. AnMarCo Property O y)/ 1VI �'. Flp '`7 Grote chnkal Fngintt°.ss,Gexelogttts&Fnvlmnmental Scienflgs Renton,Washington Proj.No. 9875 Dwn. GLS Date Oct.2001 Checked MGM Date 10/3/01 Plate A5 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and ' judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of enfnnneafinn nrocenturl nn*tic Inn Test Pit Log r Project Name: Sheet of AnMarCo Property 1 1 Job No. Logged by. Date: Test Pit No.: 9875 MGM 9/13/01 TP-5 Excavation Contactor. Ground Surface Elevation: Client 60' Notes: 0 — m Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil &Duff 8" General W a. a�. a Notes (oh) % o " m >. •••••� SM Brown silty SAND, loose, moist(Possible Fill) • • • • • ••i i-H 3 ML Brown sandy SILT, loose to medium dense, moist(Possible Fill) • -���� 4• • 29.6 ��H 5 — •:~H 6 ML Brown SILT, medium dense to dense, moist 7 - 28.4 8 -massive to thinly laminated -blocky 9 10 SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist to wet • I _ 12 — 13 14 15 -becomes wet,contains pockets of blue gray • 16 — -becomes blue gray Test pit terminated at 16.5 feet below existing grade.'No groundwater encountered during excavation. 0 O n r 0. 0. a ,.0 E . 4411V. Test Pit Log Earth Consultants Inc. AnMarCo Property 9 tll J J N.Ulf MO GootectinIcal Fnglt xxa».Geologists&Environmental Scientists Renton,Washington Proj.No. 9875 Dwn. GLS Date Oct.2001 Checked MGM Date 10/3/01 Plate A6 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and -- 1udgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of nfnnnflfinn nroconferl nn fhie In,. Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of AnMarCo Property 1 1 Job No. • Logged by. Date: Test Pit No.: 9875 MGM 9/13/01 TP-6 Excavation Contactor • Ground Surface Elevation: Client 55' Notes: 75 Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil &Duff 12" General W Notes (%) TPSL TOPSOIL and DUFF ML Mottled brown SILT, medium dense, moist • 2 3 4 31.9 5 • 6 SM Reddish brown silty SAND, medium dense, moist 7 — -trace gravel •, 8 -• . • • 9 — 17.3 :.: • : . 10 • . 11 • 12 SM Blue gray silty SAND with gravel,very dense, moist 13 . , 11.5 -31%fines ; 14 Test pit terminated at 14.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. P. gh: 4/41. Test Pit Log co -AI( :-iii ..,1411)1 Earth Consultants Inc. AnMarCo Property • N CropteCtIntc-al EngInerss.Geologists&Environmental Scientists Renton,Washington Proj.No. 9875 Own. GLS Date Oct.2001 Checked MGM Date 10/3/01 Plate A7 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of ininrmafinn nraacanfori nn'hie Inn Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of AnMarCo Property 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9875 MGM 9/13/01 TP-7 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: Client 60' Notes: 0 — a, — Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil&Duff 2"-3" General W P 2 0. „c° 2 E r E E Notes (A) o SM Brown silty SAND,dense, moist _ 1 8.3 ;:.:> r 2 SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense to dense, moist 3 4 5 , 6 7 1.; 8 — 9 :L: 10 11 ! : ! ( I 12 18.4 SM Blue gray silty SAND with gravel,very dense, moist . : _15.8 13 Test pit terminated at 13.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. 8 6- CD. - II : 44 Test Pit Log , .. Nrk, r co I 0) ;-411v1111 Earth Consultants Inc. AnMarCo Property ifif Gwtechnical Enginexas,Geologists&Environmental Scienttos Renton,Washington , Proj.No. 9875 Own. GLS Date Oct 2001 Checked MGM Date 10/3/01 Plate A8 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and , judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of onfnnnchinn nnoecinfari nn thic Inn Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of AnMarCo Property 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9875 MGM 9/13/01 TP-8 Excavation Contactor Ground Surface Elevation: Client 50' Notes: 52 7: co • Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil&Duff 18" General W . .0 Notes em Is TPSL TOPSOIL and DUFF • 4,•+.0_&•• 2 SM Mottled brown silty SAND, loose, moist(Possible Fill) 95 - -•-• ••• • • ... • • 3 — •+1 — • - 4 SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist • 5 — 6 — 8 — 11.4 , 9 — 10 -large cobbles TUKWILA FORMATION(Tt): Brown CONGLOMERATE, highly 11 \weatherPli, highly fractured motierately.harti Test pit terminated at 11.0 feet below oasting grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. (9. U1 , 0 Ui Lid‘s., ANN. Test Pit Log I 11( '-/i0/10 Earth Consultants Inc. AnMarCo Property\ wt/ fif I Nt4 Grotecteacal Fristnems,Greologts(s&FIWItonmentai scientism I Renton,Washington Proj.No. 9875 Own. GLS I Date Oct.2001 Checked MGM I Date 10/3/01 I Plate A9 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessanly representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of anfnrmatinn nreaconforl an thic X c?' tir a-01 d y I a r • i a d �� APPENDIX B LABORATORY TEST RESULTS E-9875 Earth Consultants, Inc. SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH,U.S.STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM O o o 0 M N 0 2 100N 0O V N N 7�N{ 4 4O 142 0 C) v COO CD CO0.- O 0 O O p 0 0. O O 0 O .,,._ 90 - - ) - . 10 NoN ._---lak'•,. k- p W 80 \ N 20 n ^+� 30 = x C) z 70 .- m om' 7 0 --I % 0� Z cn ., d U) T 60 ` 40 n C m 1J 01 O :� 7o D 50 ` 50 = 73 o 40 '.� 60 .. fl W • Or r • = 30 �s.~fl 70 --I \o m \ L7 co 20 - 80 —1 A _ a 10 90 M Z I 11 1 1 1 I I 1 11I I I I I 1 I 11 1 1 1 I I I t i l l 100 (D 0 0 0 0 co CD a M N O CO f0 [t M N e- 00 (0 V M N CO 0 0 M N M M N 0 —, O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O rt D M N GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o w 2 m 0 H COARSE ) FINE COARSE 1 MEDIUM I FINE CD 0 COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES I— m o w 1-d o DMoisture w Boring or DEPTH Content (/o) o p m y KEY Test Pit No. (ft.) USCS DESCRIPTION o LL PL rr Ot rt ° Chm p p TP-1 3.5 SM Dark brown silty SAND with gravel 13 --- --- -D Er p--— TP-4 10 SM Reddish brown silty SAND with gravel 12.9 td 0— . TP-6 13.5 SM Gray silty SAND with gravel 11.5 --- --- •_.— TP-7 2 SM Brown silty SAND 8.3 --- --- DISTRIBUTION E-9875 4 Copies Stoneway Concrete 1915 Maple Valley Highway Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: David L. Halinen, Esq. 2 Copies Gary Merlino Construction Co., Inc. 9125 - •10th South Seattle, Washington 98108 Attention: Gary Merlino 1 Copy Halinen Law Offices, PS 2115 North 30`h, Suite 203 Tacoma, Washington 98403 Attention: David L. Halinen, Esq. 1 Copy Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 - 72nd Avenue South Kent, Washington 98032 Attention: Joe Hopper Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY ANMARCO PROPERTY BEACON COAL MINE ROAD AND MONSTER ROAD RENTON, WASHINGTON MCROFLW'ED E-9875 January 18, 2002 PREPARED FOR GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC: 441 A-e1 st,„,,,.;.„ itchell'G. McGinnis Project Geologist.® A . 5 : ,i40 Wilts. 0 '4 /V ;; ,* ,' :: t (1) :'41[16/02- Áè ; 494: .4 Raymond A. Coglas, P.E.. . Project Manager. Ei��s 7 f 2� Earth Consultants, Inc. 1805 - 136th Place Northeast, Suite 20.1 - 'Bellevue, Washington 98005 (425) 643-3780 Toll Free `1-888-739-66.70 ' IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT 1 1 More construction problems are caused by site subsur- technical engineers who then render an opinion about face conditions than any other factor. As troublesome as overall subsurface conditions,•their likely reaction to ' subsurface problems can be, their frequency and extent proposed construction activity, and appropriate founda- have been lessened considerably in recent years,due in tion design. Even under optimal circumstances actual 1 large measure to programs and publications of ASFE/ conditions may differ from those inferred to exist, ' The Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in because no geotechnical engineer, no matter how the Geosciences. qualified, and no subsurface exploration program, no The following suggestions and observations are offered matter how comprehensive, can reveal what is hidden by to help you reduce the geotechnical-related delays, earth, rock and time.The actual interface between mate- cost-overruns and other costly headaches that can rials may be far more gradual or abrupt than a report occur during a construction project. indicates.Actual conditions in areas not sampled may differ from predictions. Nothing can be done to prevent the unanticipated, but steps can be taken to help minimize their A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING impact. For this reason, most experienced owners retain their REPORT IS BASED ON A UNIQUE SET geotechnical consultants through the construction stage, to iden- tify variances, conduct additional tests which may be 1 OF PROJECT-SPECIFIC FACTORS needed,and to recommend solutions to problems encountered on site. I A geotechnical engineering report is based on a subsur- face exploration plan designed to incorporate a unique SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS set of project-specific factors.These typically include: I the general nature of the structure involved, its size and CAN CHANGE configuration; the location of the structure on the site and its orientation; physical concomitants such as Subsurface conditions may be modified by constantly- I access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities, changing natural forces. Because a geotechnical engi- and the level of additional risk which the client assumed neering report is based on conditions which existed at by virtue of limitations imposed upon the exploratory the time of subsurface exploration, construction decisions program. To help avoid costly problems, consult the should not be based on a geotechnical engineering report whose 1 geotechnical engineer to determine how any factors adequacy may have been affected by time. Speak with the geo- which change subsequent to the date of the report may technical consultant to learn if additional tests are affect its recommendations. advisable before construction starts. Unless your consulting geotechnical engineer indicates Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and . I otherwise, your geotechnical engineering report should not natural events such as floods,earthquakes or ground- I be used: water fluctuations may also affect subsurface conditions I •When the nature of the proposed structure is and, thus, the continuing adequacy of a geotechnical changed, for example, if an office building will be report. The geotechnical engineer should be kept erected instead of a parking garage, or if a refriger- apprised of any such events,and should be consulted to ated warehouse will be built instead of an unre- determine if additional tests are necessary. frigerated one; •when the size or configuration of the proposed GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE 1 structure is altered; PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES •when the location or orientation of the proposed AND PERSONS structure is modified; •when there is a change of ownership, or Geotechnical engineers' reports are prepared to meet I •for application to an adjacent site. the specific needs of specific individuals.A report pre- 1 Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility for problems pared for a consulting civil engineer may not be ade- 1 which may develop if they are not consulted after factors consid- quate for a construction contractor, or even some other ered in their report's development have changed. consulting civil engineer. Unless indicated otherwise, this report was prepared expressly for the client involved and expressly for purposes indicated by the client. Use - I MOST GEOTECHNICAL "FINDINGS" by any other persons for any purpose,or by the client ARE PROFESSIONAL ESTIMATES for a different purpose, may result in problems. No indi- ! vidual other than the client should apply this report for its Site exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions intended purpose without first conferring with the geotechnical only at those points where samples are taken,when engineer. No person should apply this report for any purpose they are taken. Data derived through sampling and sub- other than that originally contemplated without first conferring sequent laboratory testing are extrapolated by geo- with the geotechnical engineer. I i-d I , A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING der the mistaken impression that simply disdaiming re- REPORT IS SUBJECT TO sponsibility for the accuracy of subsurface information always insulates.them from attendant liability. Providing MISINTERPRETATION the best available information to contractors helps pre- Costly problems can occur when other design profes- vent costly construction problems and the adversarial sionals develop their plans based on misinterpretations attitudes which aggravate them to disproportionate of a geotechnical engineering report.lb help avoid scale. El these problems, the geotechnical engineer should be J� retained to work with other appropriate design profes- READ RESPONSIBILITY sionals to explain relevant geotechnical findings and to CLAUSES CLOSELY l�' review the adequacy of their plans and specifications 1_ relative to geotechnical issues. Because geotechnical engineering is based extensively• on judgment and opinion, it is far less exact than other I design disciplines.This situation has resulted in wholly unwarranted claims being lodged against geotechnical ft BORING LOGS SHOULD NOT BE consultants.To help prevent this problem,geotechnical engineers have developed model clauses for use in writ- SEPARATED FROM THE ten transmittals.These are not exculpatory clauses ENGINEERING REPORT designed to foist geotechnical engineers' liabilities onto someone else.Rather, they are definitive dauses which Final boring logs are developed by geotechnical engi- identify where geotechnical engineers' responsibilities neers based upon their interpretation of field logs begin and end.Their use helps all parties involved rec- j (assembled by site personnel)and laboratory evaluation ognize their individual responsibilities and take appro- of field samples.Only final boring logs customarily are priate action. Some of these definitive dauses are likely induded in geotechnical engineering reports.These logs to appear in your geotechnical engineering report,and should not under any circumstances be redrawn for inclusion in you are encouraged to read them dosely.Your geo- architectural or other design drawings,because drafters technical engineer will be pleased to give full and frank maycommit errors or omissions in the transferprocess. answers to your questions. Although photographic reproduction eliminates this ' problem,it does nothing to minimize the possibility of OTHER STEPS YOU CAN TAKE TO 1 contractors misinterpreting the logs during bid prepara- tion.When this occurs,delays,disputes and unantici- REDUCE RISK , pated costs are the all-too-frequent result. Your consulting geotechnical engineer will be pleased to To minimize the likelihood of boring log misinterpreta- discuss other techniques which can be employed to mit ?t- - tion,give contractors ready access to the complete geotechnical igate risk. In addition,ASFE has developed a variety of engineering report prepared or authorized for their use. materials which may be beneficial.Contact ASFE for a Those who do not provide such access may proceed un- complimentary copy of its publications directory. 1 Published by ASFE THE ASSOCIATION OF ENGINEERING FIRMS PRACTICING IN THE GEOSCIENCES 8811 Colesville Road/Suite G 106/Silver Spring, Maryland 20910/(301) 565-2733 1 0788/3M 1) Earth Consultants Inc. li Ir�� Geotechnical Engineers.Geologists&Environmental Scientists January 18, 2002 E-9875 Gary Merlino Construction Co., Inc. 9125 - 10th South Seattle, Washington 98109 Attention: Mr. Gary Merlino Dear Mr. Merlino: We are pleased to submit our report entitled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, AnMarCo Property, Beacon Coal Mine Road and Monster Road, Renton, Washington". This report II presents the results of our field exploration, selective laboratory tests, and engineering analyses. The attached study provides a summary of our field exploration, site observations, engineering analyses and recommendations for accomplishing the planned grading and supporting the west side of the proposed gravel parking area. We appreciate this opportunity to have been of service to you. If you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please call. Respectfully submitted, • EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. Scott Dinkelman, CEG Associate Engineering Geologist MGM/SDD/RAC/jme Earth Consultants, Inc. 11805-136th Place N.E.,Suite 201,Bellevue,Washington 98005 Bellevue(425)643-3780 FAX(425)746-0860 Tot Free(888)739-6670 TABLE OF CONTENTS E-9875 PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 General 1 Project Description 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 Surface 2 Subsurface 3 Existing Modular Block Wall 5 Groundwater 5 Laboratory Testing 6 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6 General 6 Modular Block Wall 7 Excavations and Slopes 7 Site Preparation and General Earthwork 8 Seismic Design Considerations 10 LIMITATIONS 11 Additional Services 11 Earth Consultants, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS, Continued E-9875 APPENDICES Appendix A Field Exploration Appendix B Laboratory Test Results ILLUSTRATIONS Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Test Pit Location Plan Plate 3 Three Block Wall Configuration Plate Al Legend Plates A2 through A9 Test Pit Logs Plate B1 Grain Size Analyses Earth Consultants, Inc. ( GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY ANMARCO PROPERTY BEACON COAL MINE ROAD AND MONSTER ROAD RENTON, WASHINGTON E-9875 INTRODUCTION General This report presents the results of the geotechnical engineering study completed by Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) for the AnMarCo Property, Beacon Coal Mine Road and Monster Road, Renton, Washington. The general location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1 . The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface conditions in the area of the west-facing slope along the west side of Beacon Coal Mine Road, and to provide specific geotechnical engineering recommendations for the earthwork and proposed modification of an existing modular block wall along the west side of the site. Project Description We understand that you plan to regrade a portion of the existing commercial property west of the intersection of Beacon Coal Mine Road and Monster Road for construction of a gravel parking and storage area. At the time that our study was performed, the site, existing structures, and our exploration locations were approximately as shown on the Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 2. Based on preliminary design information, cuts on the order of two (2) to twelve (12) feet will be required to reach proposed finished grade within the limits of the planned gravel parking area. Two to four feet of fill will be required to reach finished grades in the southcentral and western portions of the site. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 2 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002. The immediate eastern portion of the proposed parking area will be bounded to the east by an approximately twelve (12) to sixteen (16) foot high southwest and west-facing cut slope. The proposed cut slope will extend up from the parking area to the western shoulder of Beacon Coal Mine Road at 2H:1V (Horizontal to Vertical). The proposed parking area will extend from approximately one hundred (100) to two hundred fifty (250) feet in an east-west direction from the toe of slope to the west side of the development area at a gradient of 5 percent or less. The western limits of the planned parking area will be supported by an approximately four hundred thirty (430) foot long, nine foot high modular ("ecology") block wall. The proposed wall is to be constructed along the same alignment as a six foot high block wall that currently exists along the western limits of the proposed parking area. The height of the wall along the current wall alignment will be increased to nine feet by adding an additional level of blocks along the entire length of the existing wall. Up to four feet of fill will be placed behind the wall in the immediate southeastern portion of the proposed grading area. The conclusions and recommendations in this study are based on our understanding of the proposed improvements which are based on the project information provided us. If P P P the above project description is incorrect or the project information changes, we should be consulted to review the recommendations contained in this study and make modifications, if needed. SITE CONDITIONS Surface The subject site consists of an irregularly-shaped, industrially-zoned property located immediately west of the intersection of Beacon Coal Mine Road and Monster Road in Renton (see Plate 1, Vicinity Map). The planned development area extends (a) approximately two hundred (200) to two hundred and fifty (250) feet in an east-west direction from the west side of Beacon Coal Mine Road to an existing gravel road within the western portion of the site and (b) approximately six hundred (600) feet in a north- south direction from an asphalt paved access road on the south side of the site north to Beacon Mine Road on the north side of the site. The overall topography of the site slopes to the west-southwest at gradients ranging from nearly level to approximately 80 percent. Earth Consultants, Inc. ' II 1I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 3 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002 The northwesternportion of theplanned development area consists of a relativelylevel P bench approximately three hundred and sixty (360) foot long (north-south) and twenty (20) to one hundred and twenty (120) feet wide (east-west). The east side of the bench is bounded by a four to twelve (12) foot high south-southwest facing slope that extends up to Beacon Coal Mine Road. The western side of the bench consists of an approximately ten (10) foot high southwest facing slope that descends to a gravel storage area at gradients on the order of 40 to 80 percent. The benched portion of the site is currently undeveloped. The southern and western portions of the site consist of a relatively-level, gravel-covered parking and storage area. The topography within this area slopes gradually to the south- southwest at gradients of typically 10 percent or less. The northwestern portion of the planned development area contains a twenty (20) foot high southwest facing excavated slope that extends down to an existing detention pond at gradients of approximately 40 to 80 percent. The western and southern portions of the site are covered by gravel. The bench area in the northeastern portion of the planned development area is vegetated by localized small to medium diameter trees with a dense understory of blackberry bushes and miscellaneous brush. Subsurface Subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating eight test pits in the vicinity of the proposed cut slope adjacent to Beacon Coal Mine Road. The approximate locations of our test pits are shown on Plate 2. Please refer to the Test Pits Logs, Plates A2 through A9, for a detailed description of the conditions encountered at each location explored. A description of the field exploration methods is included in Appendix A. The following is a generalized description of the subsurface conditions encountered. At our test pit locations, we encountered a surficial layer of topsoil and duff. The topsoil and duff layer was typically six (6) to twelve (12) inches thick with localized areas up to eighteen (18) inches thick as encountered in Test Pits TP-4 and TP-8. The topsoil was characterized by its dark brown color, loose consistency, and the presence of abundant roots and organic debris. The topsoil is not suitable for support of the proposed modular block wall, and should not be used as structural fill. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 4 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002 Underlying the topsoil at six of our eight test pit locations, we encountered two and one half to six feet of fill. The fill consists of loose to medium dense silty sand (Unified Soil Classification, SM) and sandy silt (ML) with varying amounts of gravel. The fill soils are similar in appearance to the underlying native soils but are characterized by their loose consistency and disturbed appearance. Underlying the fill at two of our test pit locations, we encountered a layer of what appears to be an old slope wash deposit. In Test Pits TP-1 and TP-2 in the southern portion of the exploration area, we encountered seven to seven and one half feet of medium dense silty sand (SM) with varying amounts of gravel, cobbles, and occasional boulders. The gravel and cobbles were comprised primarily of weathered, subangular to subrounded igneous rocks. Underlying the topsoil, duff, and fill in Test Pits TP-3, TP-4, TP-5, and TP-6 we encountered four and one half feet of medium dense to dense silt (ML). The silt encountered in Test Pits TP-3, TP-4, and TP-5 was massive to thinly laminated. The silt encountered in Test Pit TP-6 consisted of highly weathered medium dense silt with no apparent lamina. At all of our test pit locations we encountered a layer of weathered to unweathered glacial till to a maximum depth of sixteen and one half (16.5) feet below existing grade. The glacial till was encountered underlying fill, slope wash, laminated silt, or directly underlying the topsoil and duff depending on the location of the excavation. At our test pit locations, the till consisted of medium dense to very dense silty sand with varying amounts of gravel. The glacial till typically became dense to very dense at depths ranging from twelve and one half (12.5) to sixteen (16) feet below grade. Underlying the glacial till in Test Pits TP-3 and TP-8, we encountered highly fractured weathered bedrock of what is likely the Tukwila Formation (Map Unit Tt). The bedrock was encountered at ten and one half (10.5) feet below grade in Test Pit TP-8 and at fifteen (15) feet below grade in Test Pit TP-3. At both of the locations, we encountered refusal and only a small amount of the rock was recovered from the excavation. The samples recovered appeared to be comprised of highly weathered sandstone/conglomerate with igneous derived clasts consistent with those defined in the Tukwila Formation. Earth Consultants, Inc. i I ' GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 5 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002 Existing Modular (Ecology) Block Wall As part of our study, we reviewed the condition of the existing modular block wall on the west side of the site. It is planned to increase the height of the west wall by three feet. The immediate western limit of the proposed parking area is supported by an existing modular block wall situated on a relatively level bench currently being used as a container storage area. The existing wall consists of an approximately four hundred thirty (430) foot long wall constructed of 3-foot wide by 3-foot thick by 6-foot long concrete blocks. The wall consists of two courses of blocks with the base course embedded approximately four to six inches below grade. At several locations along the wall, we observed two to four inch gaps between the individual blocks and sections where the upper course of blocks has rotated over the edge of the base course. During our reconnaissance, we did not observe indications of free draining gravel or a drain pipe behind the existing wall. In our opinion, portions of the existing wall may need to be dismantled and re-aligned prior to placement of the additional row of blocks. Groundwater Light to moderate groundwater seepage was encountered at twelve (12) feet below grade in Test Pit TP-1 . In addition, mottled soils and increased soil moisture were encountered at widely varying depths throughout the site. The observed seepage, mottling, and increased soil moisture appear to be indicative of a perched groundwater condition. Based on the observed soil and groundwater conditions at our test pit locations, it is possible groundwater seepage will be encountered in site excavations depending on the time of year the grading is conducted. The contractor should be aware that groundwater is not static. There will be fluctuations in the level depending on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other factors. Generally, the water level is higher and seepage rate is greater in the wetter winter months. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY . Page 6 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002 Laboratory Testing Laboratory tests were conducted on several representative soil samples to verify or modify the field soil classification and to evaluate the general physical properties and engineering characteristics of the soil encountered. Visual field classifications were supplemented by grain size analyses on representative soil samples. Moisture content tests were performed on all samples. The results of laboratory tests performed on specific samples are provided either at the appropriate sample depth on the individual test pit logs or on a separate data sheet contained in Appendix B. It is important to note that these test results may not accurately represent the overall in-situ soil conditions. Our geotechnical recommendations are based on our interpretation of these test results and their use in guiding our engineering judgment. ECI cannot be responsible for the interpretation of these data by others. In accordance with our Standard Fee Schedule and General Conditions, the soil samples for this project will be discarded after a period of fifteen (15) days following completion of this report unless we are otherwise directed in writing. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on the results of our study, in our opinion the proposed improvements can be completed generally as planned. Our test pits indicate the eastern limit of the planned development area is underlain by loose fill overlying loose to very dense native soil and weathered bedrock. In our opinion this area can be regraded to a permanent gradient of 2H:1V. In our opinion, the existing modular block wall can be raised to a maximum height of nine feet provided (a) drainage is installed behind the wall, (b) the existing blocks that have rotated are straightened, and (c) the base course of blocks is embedded by placing twelve (12) inches of structural fill in front of the wall. • Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 7 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002 This report has been prepared for specific application to this project only and in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area for the exclusive use of Gary Merlino Construction Co. Inc. and AnMarCo and their respective representatives. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This report, in its entirety, should be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. Modular Block Wall In order to achieve final grades, it is planned to increase the height of the modular block wall on the west side of the site. The existing wall is constructed of solid concrete blocks measuring about three feet high, three feet deep, and six feet long. The existing wall is two courses high -- about six feet. The height of the wall will be increased by one block, resulting in a final wall height of nine feet. As part of our field exploration, we observed the condition of the existing wall. The existing wall was constructed vertically. In some areas, we observed the wall has rotated beyond vertical. The base course of the blocks was observed to be embedded four to six inches into the ground. During our review, we did not observe indications of free draining gravel or.a drain pipe behind the wall. In our opinion, the height of the existing wall can be increased generally as planned. However, where the existing wall has rotated, the existing blocks should be pushed into a vertical position. A drainage zone should also be installed behind the existing and new portions of the wall. At a minimum, the drainage zone should consist of an eighteen (18) inch wide layer of free draining rock placed at the full height of the wall. A four inch diameter perforated collector pipe should be installed at the base of the drain rock. The collector pipe should consist of rigid PVC. We do not recommend using corrugated plastic pipe. The drain rock should consist of pea gravel or washed rock. The base course of blocks should also be embedded at least twelve (12) inches below finished grade. This can be accomplished by placing an additional six to eight inches of structural fill in front of the existing wall. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 8 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002 Please refer to Plate 3 (Three Block Wall Configuration) for a schematic drawing of the wall and drainage configuration. Excavations and Slopes I The following information is provided solely as a service to our client. Under no circumstances should this information be interpreted to mean that ECI is assuming responsibility for construction site safety or the Contractor's activities; such responsibility is not being implied and should not be inferred. The inclination of temporary slopes is dependent on several variables, including the height of the cut, the soil type and density, the presence of groundwater seepage, construction ' I timing, weather, and surcharge loads from adjacent structures, roads and equipment. In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state (WISHA), and Federal (OSHA) safety regulations. Based on the information obtained from our field exploration and laboratory testing, in our opinion the upper loose to medium dense fill and native soils would be classified as Type C by OSHA/WISHA. Temporary cuts greater than four feet in height in Type C soils should be sloped at an inclination of 1 .5H:1 V. The underlying dense to very dense native soil and weathered bedrock would be classified as Type A by OSHA/WISHA. Temporary cuts greater than four feet in height in Type A soils may be sloped at an inclination of 0.75H:1 V. The lower four feet of temporary cuts a Type A soils may be cut vertically. Because of the many variables involved, the inclination of temporary excavation slopes should be evaluated during construction, as the actual soil conditions become more apparent. ECI should be on-site to observe the excavations and to assess the soil conditions exposed in the excavation. If during construction, slopes of this inclination, or flatter, cannot be constructed, temporary shoring may be necessary. Shoring will help protect against slope or excavation collapse, and will provide protection to workers in the excavation. If temporary shoring is needed, we can provide shoring design criteria. II Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 9 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002 Permanent cut and fill slopes should be inclined no steeper than 2H:1V. Cut slopes should be observed by ECI during excavation to verify that conditions are as anticipated. Supplementary recommendations can then be developed, if needed, to improve stability, including flattening of slopes or installation of surface or subsurface drains. Due to the presence of bedrock observed at some of the test pits, difficult digging conditions may be encountered along the proposed cut slope. Permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. Site Preparation and General Earthwork The proposed development area should be stripped and cleared of all topsoil, vegetation, duff, or other organic or deleterious material. A representative from ECI should observe the prepared subgrade. Existing utility pipes, that will be abandoned should be plugged or removed so they do not provide a conduit for water and cause stability problems. Following the stripping operation and excavations necessary to reach construction subgrade elevations, the ground surface where structural fill, foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be placed should be observed by an ECI representative. Proofrolling may be necessary to identify soft or unstable areas. Proofrolling should be performed under the observation of a representative of ECI. Soil in loose or soft areas, if recompacted and still excessively yielding, should be overexcavated and replaced with structural fill to a depth that will provide a stable base beneath the general structural fill. The optional use of a geotextile fabric placed directly on the overexcavated surface may help to bridge unstable areas. Structural fill is defined as compacted fill placed under load-bearing areas. Structural fill under footings or the modular block walls should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding twelve (12) inches in loose thickness and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of its laboratory maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-91 (Modified Proctor). The fill materials should be placed at or near their optimum moisture content. Fill under pavements and walks should also be placed in horizontal lifts and compacted to 90 percent of maximum dry density except for the top twelve (12) inches, which should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum dry density. 11 Ti Earth Consultants, Inc. I ' I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 10 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002 During dry weather, most soils that are compactible and non-organic can be used as structural fill. Based on the results of our laboratory tests, the on-site soils at the time of our exploration appear to be near the optimum moisture content and should be suitable for use in their present condition as structural fill, provided that the grading operations are conducted during dry weather. However, laboratory testing indicates the site soils have greater than 5 percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve. Soil with fines in this range will degrade if exposed to excessive moisture, and compaction and grading will be difficult if the soil moisture increases significantly above its optimum condition. If the site soil is exposed to moisture and cannot be adequately compacted, then it may be necessary to import a soil that can be compacted. During dry weather, any non- organic compactible granular soil with a maximum aggregate size of three inches can be used. Fill for use during wet weather should consist of a fairly well graded granular material having a maximum aggregate size of three inches and no more than 5 percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve based on the minus 3/4-inch fraction. A contingency in the earthwork budget should be included for this possibility. Seismic Design Considerations The Puget Lowland is classified as a Seismic Zone 3 in the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). Earthquakes occur in the Puget Lowland with regularity. However, the majority of these events are of such low magnitude they are not felt without instruments. Large earthquakes do occur, as indicated by the 1949, 7.2 magnitude earthquake in the Olympia area, the 1965, 6.5 magnitude earthquake in the Midway area, and the 2001, 6.8 magnitude Nisqually earthquake. There are three potential geologic hazards associated with a strong motion seismic event at this site: ground rupture, liquefaction, and ground motion response. Ground Rupture: The strongest earthquakes in the Puget Lowland are widespread, subcrustal events, ranging in depth from thirty (30) to fifty-five (55) miles. Surface faulting from these deep events has not been documented to date. Therefore, it is our opinion, that the risk of ground rupture at this site during a strong motion seismic event is negligible. Earth Consultants, Inc. it GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 11 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002 Liquefaction: Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which soils lose all shear strength for short periods of time during an earthquake. Groundshaking of sufficient duration results in the loss of grain to grain contact and rapid increase in pore water pressure, causing the soil to behave as a fluid. To have a potential for liquefaction; a soil must be cohesionless with a grain size distribution of a specified range (generally sand and silt); it must be loose; it must be below the groundwater table; and it must be subject to sufficient magnitude and duration of groundshaking. The effects of liquefaction may be large total and/or differential settlement for structures founded in the liquefying soils. In our opinion, the potential for liquefaction induced settlement of the medium dense to very dense soils encountered at this site should be negligible provided that the recommendations contained in our report are followed. Ground Motion Response: The 1997 UBC seismic design section provides a series of soil types that are used as a basis for seismic design of structures. Based on the encountered soil conditions, it is our opinion that soil type Sc, Very Dense Soil and Soft Rock from Table 16-J should be used for design. LIMITATIONS Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses, the design information provided us, and our experience and engineering judgment. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No warranty is expressed or implied. The recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the test pits. Soil and groundwater conditions between test pits may vary from those encountered. The nature and extent of variations between our exploratory locations may not become evident until construction. If variations do appear, ECI should be requested to reevaluate the recommendations of this report and to modify or verify them in writing 1 prior to proceeding with the construction. 1 I Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 12 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002 Additional Services As the geotechnical engineer of record, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design and specifications to verify that the earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and in the construction specifications. ECI should also be retained to provide geotechnical services during construction. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. We do not accept responsibility for the performance of foundations or earthwork unless we are retained to review the construction drawings and specifications, and to provide construction observation and testing services. Earth Consultants, Inc. '- I -c.. i i e , ••- 7-- 4f r•'.. ':•;:. N4‘.'. i'lla.• k a,. •."1 Of r v' + •....,, '6 '5 ih(e; . •• e. 135714 S T Atel. ii 114: - : • ,-• •- '''''' ''I? , ' i".• -. L/tAt.; . .____ .. , .... : #1!. ./4...,,FI7STLI/ '--'''• It BLACK "fv/0 '• 1 1 ------ ..„... ST-.;:, -• 4. ,' .4 • .....,,.. . ,., a. r..,-4. • .rift 4 ni," 1 - - J• &C13-E[ CYT ION .,... T •,,rw .t..:, "44.-s- Z Flt ,'" 1. .. - ._ ..! • 7- • l Z iTr--, - - ..., &XX PIIIEX ,••1' -..: - •-•-....---;) 1 24'., -' , St .'.•'i ''• ; FTJPARMLII 1.1,4*..31- -- . .; .• S4". 2 40 . r • 4 14:An 1- - , • ' ,1,,a' f kft .. 1. Z ,,. lt-s- •••-. , L fZIV/r? IPA'S .7 - -- 5 14..Qr , • ..e - • Ns 1.44TH a S i -:•-.r•F ':::" a - -• 24:1449 - ..,e..-,,,..ir R-t-A' NI [,,,4 Ir, L Is ,.•a • ." 14141,4 -Cot...: — A L i AT€0 , ......., _ 2, er .1. rl, ,,, a "' tAse.)-(1-.4' ''Tutw ILA-A .. , • bire., ... „: . L. ..,..... .-4 '' f' 117 rif I. r; /lb . v. ., P.. ' NTON . .. 4. ... 14St- ":T I:r. "..,. ...,r•l'S • up!ST i -it A. :A 'z•t.. LOT ST 141 '-- '';mar" T5 ''' .. .. 144::-•T._ 24 . •t-- - .1t:F.1 ",• . \RI 0 RN D\r-n , iSiAti ST„ . , . . ...,...: ...., nc N,,,,...,,, -• ,... ....• , ,. q... . ...-- to,- , s Haw PL. 'A - -,'--- -"+-- .,". _ ,-.4 .i ik .17 4;,' — 401- •• s . . ,-0- 1,,- ST; S 2EJF41 1 IMILA .-• - ...--# -• • AV- CS'-- ihn: lir -- —/' , IS4111 SI ' - J elf"4, -':. r • .-- is .. •"\\..\,:s444;Ilik z.•0111161-741 = , ,-, 6 .i. -, - - k P III l•T L-9!"37.41;'. -t'.4. r r 1::tit:": -..------- . 1 h -• ; - simoiliS, Rita ' OF • 116111. .-..:, r,,i-nvrr:G.j.41/-1- .'"w-13"--lir c , :: ,„ "' • .'.47" 0 it 0 C*. . a r ••-• '1, i CROWD •• '''' - '''.' RAT!? .1. , 0 'e. i 71147)A ..,T in '•-..., ,r. 'WI i s'1.1'4111 ST - • - 0 P..'o G ,.., '" - ii h' $YA ri-oh V.;;;,= ..' { -1 ." .:. '?'. "." 1 r.• "' w . I . .---— . 4F....„ .. . .. ..,,, •-..- • ST *; z'' Z . i --vi -7-4 A _ lorni si:_. i t-iiiineiviit:4 :ill sa • STRAPEER ST , TT lli _ST \ . '-c I A 16,3114 •-g-1-:- -.., •• t S LT • . ..---..--,, : NTON •,,,-., ....n. g.Thavrr.,.... . ,rtr, i --, ,• 1 NC CC, Ct, Stall13 ,...•' , L. .4% ..\k l TION 26 =Inn; :. LIR c) 11'1 . • 11,,,,, ,,i /,,,/ ' \ - 4 pi: eili 1. Reference: Puget Sound Area 411164;(1.0 Ildll) Geotechrnitcal Engineers,Geologistsl&t Environtmen'tal Inc.Scientist King County/Map 655 ' By Thomas Brothers Maps Vicinity Map Dated 2002 AnMarCo Property Renton, Washington NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color. ECI cannot be responsible for any subsequent Drwn. GLS Date Sept. 2001 Proj. No. 9875 misinterpretation of the information resulting from black & white reproductions of this plate. Checked MGM Date 9/24/01 Plate 1 Proposed Access MONSTER ROAD Road 1 1 ' ' �� t Approximate Scale Top of 2:1 Slope - - ......;-= __- ,\ N ,' 0 0 40 80 160ft. l TP 3i�f?=f� ;: FZ ow c Q / TP-5 _--- _1-=� - 10 51= - — _ - to Q / % =-- co LEGEND 444476,47fl%. 9 : ,_ i„/// ' ''__- -------1--------------46- s \--. 5o IJ - _ TP-1 Approximate Location of ,,,/ ,— rn P %/ ' - Existing ECI Test Pit, Proj. No. ,- (Asphalt PavingE-9875, Sept. 2001 _ cif / ----------------- �, 0 ISubject Site --.��_ -,�__________________ __ Existing Ecology Block Wall __ _ 1 / ___--go--- _ 0 _ - -_ Limits of Cons ruc ion �, Existing__ _ __ ; �„ Topography / 36,,, -::-z � �-c 1l___J ` Existing ----�. ey, , Proposed Finish Grade / /11 • • 2 1 -- -- � ' Ecology Block Wall 1I1i1 ir24 Gravel Drive — iilihu►i1i ri+r'' 30// I Construction 28 III i\1 r i . Irnits o/ I . __—, Existing 1 \`6�26`II``IJ`% 20 ; Asphalt Paving _ _ r,`e , , .�► Existing -- - - Ecology Block Wall - - • �^ f1�: /1►� — - - — ' r` �I E Con , n . 40;„(-01,�190 Geotechnicaarthl Engineers,Geologists&Environmentalts Scientists NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color. ECI cannot Test Pit Location Plan be responsible for any subsequent misinterpretation of AnMarCo Property the information resulting from black&white reproductions Renton, Washington of this plate. Drwn. GLS Date Nov. 2001 Pro]. No. 9875 Checked MGM Date 11/29/01 Plate 2 Modular Block Wall 3H x 3W x 6L Storage Surcharge (Typical) 100psf • III=III-111-III /o III- _ /a°o 10° °' Fo °oC 18" Min. Io °o Free Draining Backfill 1'° .00c, 0 o° Cl Io°°°c Il000 8' ' p° ° ° o 0 6, IP° �o c 0 Io° °° > 0° o I,000 Ci N 0oo°c` J Ip°Oo a 0o I)0 O Mirafi 140N ►p° ° ° ° t o°° • 1' Min. 111E11 E111E111 =Embedment Depth III= g 4" Diameter �:° Rigid Perforated PVC Drain Surround with 1 Cubic Foot Per Lineal Foot Pea Gravel it SCHEMATIC ONLY-NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING LP's Eli: �Ll►� �(�1r11'd) Earth Consultants, Inc. Geotechnical Engineers,Geologists&Environmental Scientists Three Block Wall Configuration AnMarCo Property Renton, Washington Drwn. GLS Date Nov. 2001 Proj. No. 9875 Checked MGM Date 11/29/01 Plate 3 Qaa. L Z — X 4 7< --Co• g- - --------- — APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION E-9875 • Our field exploration was performed on September 13, 2001 . Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by excavating eight test pits in the vicinity of Beacon Coal Mine Road. The test pits were excavated using an excavator provided by the client. Approximate test pit locations were estimated by pacing from site features depicted on the site plan provided by the client. The locations and elevations of the test pits should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. These approximate locations are shown on the Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration was continuously monitored by a geologist from our firm who classified the soils encountered, maintained a log of each test pit, obtained representative samples, measured groundwater levels, and observed pertinent site features. The samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, which is presented on Plate Al, Legend. Representative soil samples were collected and returned to our laboratory for further examination and testing. Logs of our test pits are included as Plates A2 through A9. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and the results of the laboratory examination and tests of field samples. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. In actuality, the transitions may be more gradual. Earth Consultants, Inc. ' I I l MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAPH LETTER TYPICAL DESCRIPTION • SYMBOL SYMBOL Gravel 1 la C] u GW Well-Graded Gravels,Gravel-Sand And Clean Gravels Q o ndn4n 9W Mixtures, Little Or No Fines Gravelly (little or no fines) M r GP Poorly-Graded Gravels,Gravel- Coarse Soils Grained 1 - I - I - gp Sand Mixtures, Little Or No Fines Soils More Than + I: I GM Silty Gravels,Gravel-Sand- 50"/ Coarse Gravels With I+I 11 +l gm Silt Mixtures Fraction Fines(appreciable Retained On amount of fines) • A A. AI GC Clayey Gravels,Gravel-Sand- No.4 Sieve ( 1 gc Clay Mixtures Sand ,.o o e•o SW Well-Graded Sands, Gravelly And Clean Sand o 0 obe SW Sands, Little Or No Fines Sandy (little or no fines) d"; ±Tj S ,t•:::ii:iii: i p Poorly-Graded Sands, Gravelly More Than Soils > >p°#','a i S Sands, Little Or No Fines 50% Material p Larger Than More Than No.200 Sieve 50% Coarse Sands With SM SM Silty Sands, Sand Silt Mixtures Size Fraction .......... Passing No.4 Fines(appreciable . . amount of fines) •'..''•,':i:. SC Clayey Sands, Sand-Cla Mixtures Sieve :�•.'?<%'•••:r••:>'.>`'•< SC Y YY I I I mt. Inorganic Silts&Very Fine Sands,Rock FIo1.r,Silty- ml Clayey Fine Sands;Clayey Silts WI Slight Plasticity Fine Silts Liquid Limit 1 CL Inorganic Clays Of Low To Medium Plasticity, Grained And Less Than 50 � CI Gravelly Clays, Sandy Clays, Silty Clays, Lean ' Soils Clays Organic Silts And Organic I II II II II II OL 01 Silty Clays Of Low Plasticity • MH Inorganic Silts, Micaceous Or Diatomaceous Fine , More Than mh Sand Or Silty Soils 50% Material Silts Liuid Limit Smaller Than And CH Inorganic Clays Of High - No.200 Sieve Clays Greaterq Than 50 Ch Plasticity, Fat Clays. Size OH Organic Clays Of Medium To•High j , l , Oh Plasticity, Organic Silts l‘- 11 .`%1 PT Peat, Humus, Swamp Soils Highly Organic Soils it,. , b dG a`1 pt With High Organic Contents Topsoil 4, Humus 4,4'J Humus And Duff Layer Fill ••�•�•�••••� Highly Variable Constituents • The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the material presented in the attached logs. DUAL SYMBOLS are used to indicate borderline soil classification. C TORVANE READING,tsf I 2"O.D.SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER qu PENETROMETER READING,tsf W MOISTURE,%dry weight 11 24"I.D. RING OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER P SAMPLER PUSHED * SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED i WATER OBSERVATION WELL pcf DRY DENSITY,lbs.per cubic ft. LL LIQUID LIMIT,% 2 DEPTH OF ENCOUNTERED GROUNDWATER PI PLASTIC INDEX DURING EXCAVATION 7 SUBSEQUENT GROUNDWATER LEVEL W/DATE �� 'E'�` "*\ LEGEND • wi --i, d Earth Consultants Inc. Owitx link ul I gint:a:rs,(nx)logisls&Grvlronnxyllal Sciulasls I Proj. No. 9875 I Date Oct.01' (Plate Al ' i Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of AnMarCo Property 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9875 MGM 9/13/01 TP-1 Excavation Contactor: Client Ground Surface Elevation: 50' Notes: Surface Conditions: 2 -5 Depth of Topsoil &Duff 4"-6" General W E at c3 E Notes (%) 0 (.7) ••• •• SM Dark brown silty SAND with gravel, loose, moist(Possible Fill) •• •••••• • • •• ••• •• ••• • 2 — • • • • ••-• •• •• 3 ••• *AA. -35%fines 130 v_v•v+, • •*4 •-• *4-* ••• SM Reddish brown silty SAND, medium dense, moist(Possible Slope 6 — Wash) ] -contains gravel -trace boulders ! !!! 8 • 9 : - 10 — 11 12 — -light ot moderate seepage at 12', becomes wet 13 SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense to dense,wet 14 — ' ! 16.4 15 — 16 — -becomes dense Test pit terminated at 16.5 feet below existing grade. Perched groundwater seepage encountered at 12.0 feet during excavation. NOTE: Test pit elevations based on topography shown on Site Plan dated 6/3/2001. , 0 :c5 w /Ps. a: d4h Test Pit Log ,nt•-• ; r %Ok i-06410 Earth Consultants Inc. AnMarCo Property •-• Fp/ ifif NtiW Grxgecnnicol Enginetss,Geologists Environmenral Scientlgs Renton,Washington 6 Pe*No. 9875 Dwn. GLS Date Oct.2001 Checked MGM Date 10/3/01 Plate A2 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and I judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of ininrmolinn nrneanforl nn'hie Inn 1 Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of AnMarCo Property 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9875 MGM 9/13/01 TP-2 , Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: Client 50' Notes: 2 Ts Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil&Duff 4"-6"75 = 2 co General W :c .0 — . a. Notes (%) >, c) w D >- 0 co u) u) ..., SM Dark brown silty SAND, loose, moist(Possible Fill) 1 2 SM Reddish brown silty SAND, medium dense, moist(Possible Slope Wash) — -trace cobbles and boulders 5 — 6 — 6 9. 8 9 — SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense,wet : r 11 12 19.4 i': , :. 13 -becomes blue gray,dense , Test pit terminated at 13.0 feet below eAsting grade. No groundwater , - encountered during excavation. (4 t--- I- . 0 0 L11 CI. 0 11.): 3/1,4s,d (01: AI\ Test Pit Log d s il9 Earth Consultants Inc. , AnMarCo Property N Ifil miu Gtxnechntc-al Frigtnegas.GeologLsts&Finfironmenral Sclentlits Renton,Washington ; a t, Proj.No. 9875 Dwn. GLS Date Oct.2001 Checked MGM Date 10/3/01 Plate A3 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of infnemafinn nrocranforl nn*hie Inn I ' Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of AnMarCo Property 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9875 MGM 9/13/01 TP-3 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: Client 55' Notes: Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil &Duff 12" o £ o General W Notes (%) o `L R i 6 kn m cn , TPSL TOPSOIL and DUFF 4 1 SM Reddish brown silty SAND, loose, moist(Possible Fill) 2 18.4 3• ML Brown SILT, medium dense to dense, moist 4 5 -laminated 39.9 6 -blocky 7 8 SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist 9 10 11 12 — I 13 14 — 7.9 15 TUKWILA FORMATION(Tt): Brown SANDSTONE/ l CONGLOMERATE highly weathered, highly fractured, moderately ard Test pit terminated at 15.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. N O r W I � iti I a /10I. ,01lh, Test Pit Log I111 1 ]J Ail Earth Consultants Inc. AnMarCo Property 9 'Wi ' VJP \�t�i/ GcbR:dinlcal Fnginerss,Geologists&Environmental Sdentlsts Pro perty Renton,Washington Proj.No. 9875 Dwn. GLS Date Oct.2001 Checked MGM Date 10/3/01 Plate A4 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of ,nfnrmnfinn nrncnn4orl nn*tie Inn Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of AnMarCo Property 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9875 'MGM 9/13/01 TP-4 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: Client 55' Notes: -2" w I' c Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil&Duff 18" General W t 2 _ Notes (%) o " cn D W s. TPSL TOPSOIL and DUFF .t, • 2 — ML Reddish brown sandy SILT, medium dense, moist(Possible Fill) • 25.2 • ••••• 3 -trace small gravel •55 4 ML Brown SILT, medium dense to dense, moist 32.5 5 6 -laminated -blocky 7 8 9 SM Reddish brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist 12.9 10 11 -27%fines 12 - 13 14 -becomes dense 13.4 15 16 -becomes blue gray Test pit terminated at 16.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. • U ►`. Ear .,,►k, Test Pit Log WC`,1 Earth Consultants Inc. AnMarCo Property tyLO/ Nbi/ \iry GcotechntcdIFng1neta .Geology&A&Fnvlmn ntaISclenri Renton,Washington a F Proj.No. 9875 Own. GLS Date Oct. 2001 Checked MGM Date 10/3/01 Plate A5 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of .nfnnnefinn nrocon+orl nn ehic Inn Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of AnMarCo Property 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9875 MGM 9/13/01 TP-5 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: Client 60' Notes: 0 —o m Ti Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil&Duff 8" General W _ Notes (%) > o 'L m c •••••� SM Brown silty SAND, loose, moist(Possible Fill) LV 1 • • 2 • • •-• 3 ML Brown sandy SILT, loose to medium dense, moist(Possible Fill) W. 4 H�• 29.6 •j j�j 5 — H•• • 6 ML Brown SILT, medium dense to dense, moist 7 28.4 -massive to thinly laminated 8 -blocky 9 10 11 SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist to wet 12 13 • 14 15 -becomes wet, contains pockets of blue gray 16 — -becomes blue gray Test pit terminated at 16.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. N • n 0 - U 2 a /Uis E»:/y +��►�. Test Pit Log 4 Earth Consultants Inc. AnMarCo Property a \ j/t`��/ tiv C rtxYmi al Pnglrntx&Geologists&Environmental Scientists Renton,Washington W Proj.No. 9875 Dwn. GLS Date Oct.2001 Checked MGM Date 10/3/01 Plate A6 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of ,nfnnnofinn nroconforl nn fhic Inn • Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of AnMarCo Property 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9875 MGM 9/13/01 TP-6 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: Client 55' Notes: Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil &Duff 12" General W .0 E E co E Notes (%) 6- c 1,3 jis ••• 4, • TPSL TOPSOIL and DUFF ML Mottled brown SILT, medium dense, moist 2 3 4 31.9 5 - 6 SM Reddish brown silty SAND, medium dense, moist 7 -trace gravel 8 — 17.3 10 11 — 12 SM Blue gray silty SAND with gravel,very dense, moist 13 11.5 -31%fines 14 Test pit terminated at 14.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. F- (9. (.9 tri 44h. Test Pit Log 1641 Earth Consultants Inc. AnMarCo Property my)/Nlifff Geotecimical Engineers.Geoingisrs&Environmental Sclentlis Renton,Washington Proj.No. 9875 Dwn. GLS Date Oct.2001 Checked MGM Date 10/3/01 Plate A7 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of Infewmnfinn nrizedsinfori nn thie Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of AnMarCo Property 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9875 MGM 9/13/01 TP-7 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: Client 60' Notes: Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil &Duff 2"-3" 15 .c 7 General W . 0 E E E Notes (%) 0 cil‘ g u; SM Brown silty SAND, dense, moist 1 !!' !i 2 8.3 ; SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense to dense, moist 3 . 4 — 5 — 6 ,„ 7 — 8 9 10 22.9 11 - 12 18.4 : SM Blue gray silty SAND with gravel,very dense, moist 15.8 ; 13 Test pit terminated at 13.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. N (D. /IA) 444 Test Pit Log t; Earth Consultants Inc. AnMarCo Property Of Gentecimical EnsInetas.Geologists Environmental ScientWs Renton,Washington r LLI Proj.No. 9875 Darn. GLS Date Oct.2001 Checked MGM Date 10/3/01 Plate A8 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of .nfarnInfinn an:welts...IA an 4hic Ian Test Pit Log Project Name: ' Sheet of AnMarCo Property 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9875 MGM 9/13/01 TP-8 Excavation Contactor: ' Ground Surface Elevation: Client 50' Notes: 0 7, a, — Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil &Duff 18" General W la' .0 :E. ix ,9 2 . Notes CYO 2 >• o a, D >' , sv •i, • TPSL TOPSOIL and DUFF . 4, .. th._,,.• 2 — SM Mottled brown silty SAND, loose, moist(Possible Fill) .--- 9.5 - • • •-• ••• , •"••• 3 — •-•• •• , ••• •••• 4 SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist 5 6 7 — 8 1 - 9 11.4 - 10 — -large cobbles TUKWILA FORMATION(Tt): Brown CONGLOMERATE, highly 11 \weathered, highly frac:hired, mnderatelyhard /— Test pit terminated at 11.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. N -C2 '`. I- 0 0. U W CL Test Pit Log /1,1l'. pl. ii411‘ 23 iliel( /if oqg Earth Consultants Inc. AnMarCo Property (._el \my)/\Itif NtiFy Goatectmloal Frigtneers.Ccologlits&FrivIronmenral Scientkv Renton,Washingtons a ( I La Proj.No. 9875 Dwn. GLS Date Oct.2001 Checked MGM Date 10/3/01 Plate A9 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of inFnnnaf nreacan4ori nn*tic Inn 1 A P ' N • A I, 10-e I - APPENDIX B LABORATORY TEST RESULTS E-9875 Earth Consultants, Inc. SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS Cc----- SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH.U.S.STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM __ o z �r .a. co a co O R. o 0 o Oo op 00 0 0 O co G 0 0 O 0 P V- !O N •N`'-'. a - R. N M a 11Y fD CD N O O O O O O o 0 t ' r 1 90 • 10 - 2 I•n 'T. �` • 0 � .D 80 \. � le_. 20 m • n ''8',,t L• 30 � x. ^ m 70 m tt_. ? c) --•I ea Z rn 0- .. a N _ 40 —I T 60 _ = m _ •� o r-1- MI 50 y ` - ; 50 73 co 5 CO co = -G m O 4 S 40 - - 60 �.. G rt : = m a CO i30 �fl 70 m 20 80 -1 co _ G 10 . _ 90 1 IIII I l l I mil I I I 1I11 1 I 1 L I I I I 100 co xi 0 O O O o 100 V M N O CO f0 V M N OD (D V M N O O O O O O co O O O O O �� - D M N GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS • • O o O o O O 0 o w z CD U It COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE cp " o N COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES '-' N CD w Fd o DMoisture w Boring or DEPTH Content (/ol o H. coo D KEY Test Pit No. (ft.) USCS DESCRIPTION o LL PL OQ rt rt .< immemi °p `C O TP-1 3.5 SM Dark brown silty SAND with gravel 13 --- --- rn 01 a--- TP-4 10 SM Reddish brown silty SAND with gravel 12.9 al w 0.. •. TP-6 13.5 SM Gray silty SAND with gravel 11.5 --- --- 1- •_.— TP-7 2 SM Brown silty SAND 8.3 ___ ___ DISTRIBUTION E-9875 4 Copies Stoneway Concrete 1915 Maple Valley Highway Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: David L. Halinen, Esq. 2 Copies Gary Merlino Construction Co., Inc. 9125 —.10th South Seattle, Washington 98108 Attention: Gary Merlino 1 Copy Halinen Law Offices, PS 2115 North 30t'', Suite 203 Tacoma, Washington 98403 Attention: David L. Halinen, Esq. 1 Copy Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 — 72nd Avenue South Kent, Washington 98032 Attention: Joe Hopper Earth Consultants, Inc. &IA O1- 01 ) C.ROFi IA ED D RAI NA„ GE REPORT s � Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area 501 Monster Road S.W. Renton, Washington Prepared for: Gary Merlino Construction January 24, 2002 Our Job No. 3555 31'l` 40 rff 04A Ci I(; • CIVIL ENGINEERING,LAND PLANNING,SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES - • - � { • / 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH,KENT,WA 98032 • (425)251-6222 • (425)251-8782 FAX .. 4W www.barghausen.com n 1,4 eNG%' TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PROJECT OVERVIEW H. EXISTING CONDITIONS III. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS IV. FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN V. SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES VI. ESC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN I. PROJECT OVERVIEW I. PROJECT OVERVIEW The site of the proposed Stoneway truck parking/storage area is located in the City of Renton at 501 Monster Road S.W. The property is bounded on the east by Monster Road S.W. (formerly 68th Avenue South)and Beacon Coal Mine Road. An asphalt-paved area that is a part of the Black River Waste Reduction Center lies along nearly all of the site's west edge. (Union Pacific and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad rights-of-way lie immediately to the west of that paved area.) The site encompasses 4.0 acres, 3.6 acres of which will be cleared and graded as part of the construction of the proposed truck parking/storage area. (Most of the site is currently gravel-surfaced and is being used for miscellaneous storage.) 3555.005 [JMH/bq] L., D .. _ -4 TH ST ..., tv 4, ‘,..i Li, --• \ in r0 L•5 - Z1 al 5;IIIIIIIMLai\ INKINIIIVALIIIICIIINI tti11-'113111.180SL.4:,„ 'Z \ • -1111111Z1113,WINFEIWIFIP-m1-7 8 ,4".," .".17 pi:' S 124 ' ' 124 H ST Th„„rii .... . . si„, . -0 5 "4111 ST t \ se.g g IIIMIEFAII.„ 1 1: As 1251 Q‘', SKYWAY ...1....„ ,TH 5 I L,7,'4;5,••11) I ; 6 .•• 4 41. Er,, .,,. 6-, , PARK,';`• , 9 ,A G 7 .,..,....j. 5 126TH'ST ;.' oe4 -2, ?,- S 126 sr ,::::, 0 RA. . .‘t•-,,, ., i••• 1-tt ., !..i ner ._... .....11‘..-.... `6-f% e.,, '. .1, }„T„ ,, ‘1,,"T:','',1„ i.0 0 C-0 4, i.,.. I•% ,. g — - z ..., „9.-;:i., 1-, .t--` 1E'F.IF ‘011 I.,' ;.1•_ - --- G..44'v'2., ‘, `r. - ii:\I, . s •":3,r,...,,01,. I • /1 / 4 l'8TH ST'.1. Inv c-, .-.Ifilikir ..,, ,:.,... , 12EIT II I1/CPIPP! - 1 ., . ....,1 ........i.;:,, s %, ....5 127TH,, c z 47, _.--j. 4.4.., ?z,vs7 s7S- •14.1...'Yl`, PO ' ,• 1 5-3.'.3' '<! sT ,iii. 4'877,sr 1 ,41'.k ril'l 111111Mer''. ..i,:gli g ffi,., 2 24e* '' % ..HIGHLINE FE „,ki., .. . .g '' 4., ilik:3\ '''\ l''9).S. .. i ).2.8:H,29TH ..,, ,...-.,, a , -, ? RIVERTON ',16 ..g.,I i I 130TH ST z.' ..4 1.L.., .TH sr.4 i'L I-1,7 - 1 S 13011, Pi "3"..1:4..,-:..,, •,„..,I.J.53 s.i 4,, "Thl ra co*syny .10,, lifilLtint ,..„,k, H . ..5.170,L"fr.731.;.733',0..:"4.4•• -S.13157. '43 3;P. — il ' i 's"1'3"N7 "'''illItPlf,/,-'SI'd'Ag.'.• .. ,',' e ' r-, I ,...s.z. ,,., ,4 . a „. .,715, .. S •.• LAN ITJ:IN RD! Lea", , 3. , \ .6 I v`- ; 6 g ,., s"' ,1,,,Vitt53'11.1:811':f I'"Enillreilintir itl 142.aliTAL114r11V, Air' /' '1740\71364;.471° \5 i, 132H5 ST I32ND BLACK RIVER B, i; 134TH ST '4.3.:.:512P'S"PA..L.L.1°.1."I'v. v.I. . . , \ • ..t 51.133'...,,, ,...,.. \xi ,./. ,.z.: 4,,,, ..". ,77....,, • .4. 0,7 N'$, L'ily S 133RD % 410 v Ti7,,,,..L.411 i'' ' ..(--?14;"s.4% e 4 '' oc 2. ,, ,.!. 'i ,, ''' "' 17 "T'" ,:0 .0,10e4g ,-*. _ ' -; ils - 13'sni •---sT liNG 'To s 135TH ST l 1 S - 1136T - ST Q W--,0-Pallf,16 rf0.4t:.14.4 s.r - ,:16.,_.L, ,g : .... g 6, ,31,3,6 pi ' . 11.,.-..144174- --- 2 I: i .; ,. g,„1 10 • i•pL,, ,, glgt-i)....m,k.in?m,;%,•-.4r1{A- -., - -• s .• 2 ii-;„ 3r.k e e c.riegiuril \ 1--w:'•3‘. ,'.:I,"r,4,-4./ FOSTER ri387H Ill?ST:211!: Sv- , : At \,,,,e4D GOL r ...gge? S 38TH ay `c 24,PAff...11Ak 67-417P.1 41451-,"1.,V'stit 1391311 g 1 sr • " --'•••,-..'1. in S 13/TH PL ‘ . wC1C I ' r . , '. ,4 sTav ‘,64),? COURSE ',., it LL ,, i.,,,..,,011. ,,,,, , .,,... .... , ... . ..,. . d TiasPoimn..Mt X.' . VVA' ' , --.._ _ r•,. •q• ... 5 WHO :-.ST. ' 4 ,, '''... ''.\MM1.1111611Wirnbil .141ST E/::. _., ..f.' '::::::•,,1,.',. '''..,,..,'r''''.i::...!'t IN ...E ,n. , MINI! 400 g!,'.....;.....,`,,:,Of. 2400 ; '''' • 75. 1415i •C ''. 1415T 1_ 1:1 ' :g s 142N0,2 ,\ raOLI'''. -,.-- , BLACK RIVER 6,59.0 Ilts zit,.....,..., 6:4:STE4R 5 0, 1,/ • . • 1 • IIIA il i It,' .t FOSTER MID le S I 3RD sj-., .....i 6 i.........‘,(244-°AlE'I Al)s OP j 71 I 5 1441H S 5 ,,,, PL •AS. S 144TH " ' 3 S 144TH ST / " " HS 144 H II " \ - ST W Zi \\ i= / "147 ;:. 'I ION Z' BEE ,,4000 S 745T11 ST Rapiw.,„ 1r, lir° ST vA, ao.• r. t: % . Sl I S.'.. ,.. 146TH ST se4 s . 146TH ST IffifiliilliraM— 1 '349,91.746TH x • \ .t N , ,,,,Adfc,Nur ,ST,..... % A.E'n A•L1/;‹ S 147TH .0 4 V:i R I III / . .94 \ 1111 II LIB 1k; EL FS ipsollIMPAlr" /AK, 4.. 2 "1 ,,., u E. /ii 4.4. _, 4200 rc 1 S 1497H 5 ...'' "' . cl I i' L.- • ji ' II rcl t71 ie. i I L Lai A-A ic‘..3. ..0, i rt 4 S 1 9TH ST ''''' 14471;40 ''S‘ ' ; I * 4''r: '•''' ' 1 L 'j .•• ' ''' , k ST[. ,,, ,(.., - 150TH ST -/- 1 ST S 150TH ST “ T s 150., 53 .,F 20,- s ° ' - . . i ..\ ... k ;•,..,‘,.. 1E- `"- i 'lig " 6 i;,, .i.;L , 1,.,, ISIST S .c. 0,,,,5S2ND gin 4Fs le/i.400 ,,,ST :IT sy ,I1 PL 24 CT 4 ,t- ..-S 152ND ST ,, -1(114i EAU 1 ( !,,,,r,,, -21 s 22 A r 0+,,- ,.., 23 rt ?Gt. ST ', ::: % lirelL/WE r ..„, I , __•_...:. i5,,, -,....,..... n. o, T 1-1 R,i n V ,.LS111162/117 '\\ 5 152ND ST r- ,„f, : ,.., ....... LI E O. pe5iii''1., e -- -- 7 , ..11 .po ii,!, 4 1 , , ,.• , 0 , g . .. .... \ 'fk•,-.-_,..---- I'll'AVZ .2 ,n' \ s. .,,.SiAND Pl..p. 54 ‘"k ,,„---- '"-- su S ';,-AIRK , ST .,...., 111 i.i4 S 4 .. ,,,/ . \\..7, , liws,,--;;_._ '•‘.. miasma nj.KW,ILA .N11*...14!._.- ...2.11111 L $ 186TH - eif -... ipimcp.m211& , ''. ''..'.\.;1 -.7.4t1P___(4411111441 . -'-\- A , \\ ::s ISST5TH ST III -I s WI°di§ 1. ',- ‘,. ;s:-9iS7•F.•''II' In" , S 160TH Z ST , TACOMA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (SEE TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR AIRPORT IAN*.4 avaimitimprz c, S 156Ti ST Mill5EITH ,/. S 1 8 4. 160TH ,... n\mull ' ibb WI . PKWY 1 SPRIW •-- p -1...), i- SOUTHCENTER ST s _A./59TH.2 '1 1 EVANS IIT,1 •-•V,.1 L.5--I z &sassy ` SUITES s 5 1,. I% 'P 11• , I \ S 16IST ST R.3:./ii k,,,,,,, limmi 6-.9 45 = 'Rif' TBELcK ' ‘" • 7- 1 6. . 0, , , ,.g z61,,:, ,• .111,1k g cairvrEw . i IL", illi I ir . .. .. BAKR ER 5'' ./L ? El 1, yr; III V ism ,.,443 1 , , ; .., IT ,t ,:`,':.,•'.e.,;QM 4."1,, laIIIIIIIILpj.. .°:,f'R K, DW ST ,41 , '. I I ' 7 ° matt. 1._i I e. BLVD Ed, vpgiEIN.T ...L. ...c. "7I ' I L ' ... 4 ..,..i........................_ ,._. . , .. 7.,..._. ..52:.4.R.An..NDELENT- ,.., 11 S ,„1, 164. ST pl'NGTEILITE ilir ,1_64:Hi: 1:v.1119,. ; .8 clailICKEN cr---I P.:: 11:b3 \ a ; I 'TERMINAL N 4 1,.,•,•,,,A,....,4.04 A - 1 f . ,: i .,,,,,„),, n"fA tr a i rula u cc ix g Iv.vi 31 '4'41;I.i:4 'MIRO :WIMP MESS V .41 P° .ST I ' I../ "..5 •TIr•fGHT5PAAK. .:4 KE_IIIIIH,ivni[lrslem..11:7167ThcsIT H E _iii 16711I PL 'A.' M s k 168 . ... • ;1". N -- -r-a ._,... I 41,.• sr y ,...... (_.) ‘, :- . ..f : — Ihrli• ..,i ' ' I 1 / -. la COURTYA ;;;; BY HARRIO, . I tIr ill RENTON 25 WETLANDS:ssiH '44 I'LL4i" ' '1,41;vii k. 33RD APIOti Lt. ST 4..i.%S MT ST 1 =1,1:4'4' 2''''5 115 517°511 ,4711 ,,t1,71ST ST , 3,, 172ND111 SATEqGir;HMIIIIIIIHillig 1" ' '1- 't-"l'i LS 'LI ST 1 1p t-C', sion p ST ' r'!.. m X: RR R RAN T ill .4, ( 44444:ra. 1 CORPO Ti D HINNIES C°D P°SRA lip a•ilis,.,:,,ttp•ry,,,, g -AIRP6in:' IT73M,In SOU17i SAN-j-71:NAL ' \NL ip, :l.." 111E1111111E 173RD ST ! ..' . \ SATELLITE i! 8lila il Sz,,,172ND PL r I/ 176TH ST ) e5 Al a RENTON ‘22:1114 7 m; li PL 1 ,iiii. v . . BLVD IP (41 ..',?..A.51,.;:,,, . \\ s IATII, i ,ir - '11111 kr5 T.ERALINA.L DiAl : 1, 176TH\ S IF 1 C -1 1,g, -,,- • mpLATAY IN 1 11•,• 4.1' z * mi 110 ' C' S 171TH PL \1\ i 14T= /110" A ,.<MA,4,-4.LTE NI M SEATTLE S iralvVI WETLANOS .c2,... , HILTON MARRIOTT 5 1 7TH sT s.,. ni BOW I; , it 40, j / WIWI /0.11/43/ SEATAC "' cmwRse k\'151 1 Mg . AIRPORT s." '41.. 4300 ">4, IAKE .' .11.A \-,7e.r• - - h . 4> • i' 4547/71a4104.4 illiiiLly •j.‘ ' i I . 8 ' I 1.CH likkIll l' ' Ln 1 , Vial&. tiftlikliii AIIII ME 1 , , - , in' --,--mgmrs:„ .. A8, PIIRSINIMMIEVENVOINIMM=011111 . . . iMINICTIMMINWS 2,11•11111E1,.., SEE '-' ' MAP For detail map of airport,see page x 2' II. EXISTING CONDITIONS it II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The site slopes down to the west and all stormwater runoff is collected in a pipe drainage system and conveyed to an existing 3-cell stormwater detention pond at the site's northern end. The pond then discharges into an existing biofiltration swale that ultimately drains into a 24-inch steel pipe under the adjacent railroad right-of-way. That pipe then drains into the Duwamish River. The existing stormwater detention pond and biofiltration swale were previously designed and constructed as part of the Black River Waste Reduction Center. The Center's facilities (which include a collection/shipping facility for construction debris,a large paved area for container storage,heavy forklift loading, and truck maneuvering,and a railroad spur)lie to the south and west of the site of the proposed Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area. The existing pond was sized for those facilities and paving,and for a portion of the proposed truck parking/storage area. [Note that the site of the Black River Waste Reduction Center and the site of the proposed Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area have a common owner,AnMarCo,which is why the existing wet pond(with modifications)and the biofiltration swale are going to serve both developments.] Currently, most of the site of the proposed Stoneway Truck Parking/Storage Area has a gravel surface and is used as a miscellaneous storage area. That area also includes storm drainage outlets to the above-mentioned wet pond. • 3555.005 [JMH/bq] III. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS III. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS As explained in Section II,above,after being detained and passing through the existing biofiltration swale, stormwater runoff from the Stoneway site and from the Black River Waste Reduction Center currently discharges through a 24-inch diameter steel pipe that passes under the railroad right-of-way to the west and empties into the Green River (which becomes the Duwamish River further to the north). The discharge point is approximately 400 feet downstream from the Stoneway site. The Green-Duwamish River flows generally northerly and westerly from this point and eventually empties into Elliott Bay. The river banks along the Green-Duwamish River appear to be stable,both the stretches in a natural condition and those that have riprap protection. No evidence of erosion, siltation, or bank sloughing is evident. There also is no physical indication of lack of capacity at the Green-Duwamish River. At a point one-quarter mile downstream from the discharge point into the river, the 3.6 acres of the Stoneway site that is currently planned for development constitutes less than 0.1 percent of the total river basin. • 3555.005 [JMH/bq] IV. FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN IV. FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN The original stormwater detention pond on the Stoneway site was sized for the existing Black River Waste Reduction Center development with no extra volume for future development. The original pond volume required at the 100-year storm elevation was 9,828 cubic feet of storage. With the addition of the now- proposed truck parking/storage area,the volume required within the stormwater detention pond at the 100- year storm elevation will be 17,917 cubic feet. The intent of the redesign is to(a)widen the existing pond in order to gain the additional volume necessary and (b) utilize the existing overflow control structure without any modifications. The existing biofiltration swale is adequate to convey the additional runoff from the proposed truck parking/storage area. 3555.005 [JMH/bq] KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.5.1C 2-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS 1n� •:_-_-_- -'f-q%R `■1 -g -' y- It's— -_=Y_ _ :=----- _- _-_ y- -_ _-_ _-_-_ kvii•lit,A,15" 11 .Ontillwrirtirp, , • kik- fil II . if twig/ iiL ,,1 it onne,44 AigliiiMai - IMO /1‘ 1-1111101. L, "k‘4511 lay ii 4.,. 1, ore csi4k-Altli, /,‘ wisalormr. ... 1 I sal „Awl . . Of 1# / -Iiiidiiiiir ..° -107111144001407 i' \ lalr‘;s QV;f----AietaXir: V 1111 I IN I 11\110"..'j II,W.,.. z 1 ' '',t4 20 NOV\ i 11 's i 411i NV. it ...40 Afi eV q 1 '-‘10.,1'48 —INF:logo-4M k --N1 ,,,',1, N. — N.,„ NvIi2.44 --... `1.-11c: ofilki Am _I - , , • 1‘, .A m r ..111,' eke ,1 _�...rvll : 4;01 LA St ‘.,•• ''.. As \pie A, kii, ' - 1 '6 wir,,,„.....„...„1„ _. .,., ,....,,,,,,.„,,.., - PT Vilf VIII 11:1111w.„.11 wiiskr 0,4, %� -`�th tit l )t-axt..\\,‘04$ . -- -�`�r 1614°1 V% '1111111111,411k \ s a,// ilVz= d_. tt,1 EI p;! - -..' nil* t\` AN. AsiwkiN.‘ , - 1 Ng-,i - A:. ii '� L� , 14 f t ir 1 141MIPIk.. 7- - ' oifirtlr, r vi , 1 Vic mr, �m�. �`" litogiar 111M ,r_.. ,! ,,to,44%,,i 1 00611b , r.-.- i Mir ." i if ` `� . \ rr m ji JM P =ISPNI l :a of ako ,,....:. it OOP ill 1 Ic-' _ iraiiiimh 0.01111114 Nook 7,A, ._ __ _ . ACII4111111 impija4V11,4,0- Arg Itki _ .- \ _A ArA\ . imlik .1 „,....4.1;Tir ,_ :I i I f, - '`-- or4111/11zit 1ito N 1& .4 /177...111 r 1, i 4 _ 4 Aji , ' ix i . I X' *WNW I j4L1I!42-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION44i�rili, �AIL i ..3.4�' ISOPLUVIALS OF 2-YEAR 24HOUR q► ` W'�p1«'-' - 35 I TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES I�'�IF �� ` • o 1 . 2 3 4 5 " 6 7 8Mlles - ni N 1:300.000 3.5.1-8 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL [JRE 3.5.1D 5-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS ro _ , I.8 t l‘lir \m‘ -tow; 9 ; ►rmionaga�pi ,fir 2o i issilagA iriligiAmigarialit22 ! IIIIKIIMR* ‘/4$1/11PAIF 1k,' kI\ 6x. . / 23 1 1 itiliiP4iiiige - 1 - -'4411 AllOY ii-ritkii si 24 / IIPLirwliAillirr_ .-° 1411111:11 lifieVItklI 1 -i' ' 111 I N-...\-la& ill* , 4 s c. ".r... 46) , -, ��wiimmi � t 49, \ J .�'M-Riff ,�� r�'�������i'�Q-'��i�0 o ' Ate` s�lcoliiim&\''- 10,4-, �i�� • �..In ,. r,_ ,��'��l�� /, ty � '11111 � ill' 7 V., Vir- t de....��osimp ,, , Y ° iiiirgintik\ k- \- 11, ItpS 'c'llkOtZsviwae-.-- -wit- ( 'abs,,- 4kt a 111# _ I�\ , oij' ���'�.�4- �a,if ,? ...4 kii-ac )u\ p‘k !I" 41^-r- ' ‘'-iN11-11. 11/4\-A‘ /./. ' 7- IIII9V1‘ 1 i 8,‘ \ ...:-Amaa, A A ,\ _ A 't) ' i'l i - .111 , ,4,4 iinpoi.b,. . .N. it ,7 �� it/�R `�. . .., 1�� 'pl:�� _ ! \� ,� ` .„, i ?Ant 1 _,.._4-'1 = 'AIM'` rk4T- 1. j 414 :„„..,. 114PINIONIIL ' Ii,,t474, A • 7,4 / ,, mirk= 0 '‘ITIT%itOIWIIII.L,1114111itiakir14' `Ntv,\47-471111111 r I ''''I ttlVilliciiiiiiiinil,lkstiiill -7-. v" .4 .,, r,...„?..,, . .. ,.... / ti _ , , . ,„,,,,,,„............,.,..,_ ,,,,..i. ,,,,,.....,,,i, _ _ , . ,= , _ ,....... cz>.... i 444 PI _ eu ,;fir r r .4. j AltVI ji . kF -, -A,j1 ': -- .. 1 /Ai ''. qa'av%11W11Walk144.8110 ...,`A cuv , ifieci. 1 T,„..ir- -Nato. r r ._ _ ,,,...\ lr.,.. :11. .r. .:s„„,14 f .,„ , , .- Art .1,p, ii • a -- , 'WAVAWI r"EAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION ti VANIAIIPM % ••,, • - ISOPLUVIALS OF 5-YEAR 24-HOUR w��� %� TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES ti/y ��Ae qe d1/4 Nwlipg� giiiirr !'. = vi.rii; O 1 2 3 4 56 7 B Miles di) c'ti" CV irtm ��1:300,000 3.5.1-9 1/90 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL ' FIGURE 3.5.1E 10-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS ' 2.1 --- ' -r�e.R �L , I? - -- - lt,i ---- - - -- 113%. 2.3 . ,,v,t-7 Y T` i I alifilifa 4 A , ; „gm-trr�; 1 24 ' SIN , �►vit r:a A11411C.P 2S :omit A.A ,,t 4 26 i AligiitariiiiWOIIPLUt It_ 1 O.: JNAIN / Airtiall 29 \ ` �ti,;. F _ 3.o \ - \ migiff IliklittWirVIII.Abillvd I ... . se.*.Z' t-1 iota_ irs i ... ( pti. ,,.. . .,... ,i ta-gt. „\eii itiAviik le ,--..:-- 0. .. , ,,...x 1 . A ,,,, ,, , ..... r16,--. L a/ if/ \ , ir,‘ N ' 1,4*...ki, '._!4a17 ' , ILA:4.--'494111‘141111k, Nii WI Ital 444 r. 'W '" ( gib%,_- t N'K , :41 - 7.-: 011011rsV i c imit- 1 . - ._f - \\,a•\ / .::::1 1E5 4;1\, OM' ,11 , , 'k N, "0-4,1,, • 3, , _ , ...., ,,,,\, , logri,w, 1, ,,g... ...,, ,_ „pi. . „,,,, . ...L.Atk 14% II' wl,' 1 / ! i • 1711"1 V- `1114110401115 .-\ilk ,i - 1.4 ..!_.--i--I virifity*:'-ilitilirA0111170, r,, . , . q, / Am diii-,,i2 .:411014,..., _-__ ......"_ __:-..4 8., \ I / , AEI f , IT Virkalla 0 Itiltdoilk\ z ' , - - - c, , itla r- "-wr 41 lookitmulla s, 4 \ i ki ' - Ihillenikitiflit 4. VW- , / 400% • ( f , f0 . ,6,,,,_ 1 ,,:.-- ..:11 riitqt"Ill - s.. 944_inn.w.A. „Ilk_ „AA. - ' ifszkii 'Ail ,�. � , _ —3it . r r f � Fir:A0061„, I� . ?At otowiplik 111 Imp ..1„4,- , - Pii > - Iligfili .._. _ �, I r IF ,,1 k. FilMilligr 1 rifilw, oaular -4_1.. , it )11/r4F) `- _ ' • M a IDA mi., ---- ii - pull iiir 1/ Ilk• 1 % 7 ,, lir." • • ' ! � ! A --- —... 1 '0-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION N�,�,. '" l 3.4� ISOPLUVIALS OF 10-YEAR 24-HOUR I ��e� 'li��` 5 I TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES 3O N g�-i4it ".0 3 1 0 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mlles ��� �' 1:300,000 3.s.I-Io 3 1/90 40 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL ;URE 3.5.1F 25-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS -+„ -s --- - I eR . liAiii.WTO gill AA t . - . :1- R) .. loprooir,......'d-- .1,, -r istem _ 1 .,.,or _____.„ . g...- .4 m ---Ip: ,-is.9 '-').-------' Iriam wr %a 1 � . ( - ! 3 i �i listtipaik -Au, � sr- 3 _ 4 r i ��€ 1ii4�. �l�r, ,� t� f 1'_Al!� �i-Nr1) � �' 9 1 )1, { 3. I AI _Aidilivolor / , _IF-thi. air . _-, ----1496, 'amnia' .. •-• \OPP! 1041 W4,40 ' 1 , ,. 6 „ . ' 4$ (,, - bitilti. ,-_ ,: At_',106..=7. 1&•sistript, j__ ., i , - Titi \ 1 . . " Time ,iiimirKliwk . sdo•la il lixiiiir*IrSolio,o, 61110,5) - AiLk ''' I --1;-111 P-4\015.1404Milliww.--wimorl•IIWOve, , • 11 ,4 \1 414 . F. A liwi &ortslrosiorrio--.40:-. I 1 1... - iiik•d•Mtk! id lir 'cloWr '' ' .--w- mil vismorilraiit,,, how -‘‘A*#.4,15..L. 1 ,., ',.':, NIMINC1 at 74174,wr dr w 4 - ,i,,:mowN00-o \di, ,\- Nidithil) f. i fill ,4.4* ,,,.......... .ilho "it:-. riblitt41\ - /- t ,lata 111$‘, MOW ... \1 , .... iv \ • a .,, _ ,, ...,,, v.,, ,,,,,A, . ,- , ei„ 1 1 IIIIL_:. —I - r N to i .... , ....1 ,Tiii,,,\ kk xvityok ,,. .11. ,, ,. •-,,,,41,ik,Lci k .,. • ii, Aa. .... ., ., ib _,, , ., . Lilt%lit*Vi e II ri ( ""� T4ia', — to •., ` t ainiVA4‘ 1%)\ W i / . if _,...7 i - V c'T— .. '-'T ' Vilt iiik Q, a .' , . , - . ‘ - NA‘, 4 11110011 ( _ oo rocs\: I � \ ,,�-= .0....... ,-,, , • _: „,, , ti_ ` , .> , ,, ��� .. R� ! �' Arghi Age ....7, �. r I riff 11 orimerlitris 1.." „...-.._ , 0 ?Ilk r ? 71 i 1 \ -- \ ' Affnm=111f.. Pay 11111441,,, ,i _ r,,,I., „.... ,_ ,..- ..,. rAIL ' WAWA JETZ:-A01 - -- \:,' 6.,4_ ij, pi, l' iigarcf:-I _., ,..\ �: �`-;;�� �� lt Milti it fr - J.- •*, WinlialiFil -. 2' AR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION a ct �rl :c!' '�r 8$ rAlliftakagi Ill Str. 1- 3.4 ISOPLUVIALS OF 25-YEAR 24-HOUR h �A� /� - TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHESlir 4�.5 3• ro •ti 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mlles rb• ��J O _�` 3.5.1-11 Aj• '- 1/90 1:300,000 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL ' FIGURE 3.5.1G 50-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS • - --r,,, _. -- ,_1-611. _, - _ ,,,, _:-:.-.E:,______,,,_______ _ _ *i)_____________ _ _________________ •*9 .\"-- -- : - tii171" Lig e I it, i . , 47 ..... soppy ipigN Q_ .......mt .1 1 A III, rif ALEIL /I/ Illimmi villiii matIlliiktit Isis it • tkilf Ato-oan Irvitarltimas tql‘li ,v 4, . ,- - , _,_. / . _‘.vaivairsiims •--' I out me , lw4.4=2:1101„, -till Fr‘ , _ 4191,.. 1 ' 1 ‘ iligliPPIIENFIRI - 'I .,54,41pre1411 IA311 - . 1 = . ;71110t.; i, ,„Aseitiiikr\ \IsTiteok y _i:_. , --,i . - ,40 10)44.4 ; r ;',Ahi ,,,. 'otikOtk,_ .. 4,641k 'cl- _ ... '1 ‘m w-m-•!-,"rl11.1rA,.1:.1g O. ►.'••--711.0,o,l\\9...`,6::"-\M4 bri �lk �C O i� �� airjrplI 1li3OfP.'.,s. ,o t ' ,J? ..' .I. i'� i►� 71_'►. _� I�� � ��',��Mr.�.c ems;.; 1' !. ir , �r ih 0ap4 .Vr4_ r 40,E ' \Y 1 , . i. r 1 zt4. $,- II te Vitl,t1 ktis'44,r. --- AOPP,--14 47 . 7:411110111V \IISAIL‘Ct\ t14:4Nr(Tritg.ii\41#1 .' 7? 1_ I/ '' ..-* ilat*it, 'A Vv*I\ \ t , 6,k\ g \i4wor AN`hs ' ' P-T t.t - maim ,t malik ( ,,, --itusi: ,,___ WI/ • 111114141t itmows,, ,,,, . \ .. ... , - f -1 .tli\s / := i ! Wilk lk\VWN ' , ' A ;:41 1� P� —����� .�' „yak �. k \\IL `'�II 1' m , " : 'I�*`d�� ! it 1� `z�� fi` % / j 1 IrogisiL: 4. ,-, DimalitSaiMilltklitl:\A N‘.4„kii4 1 ki/.1_' . ' !,Als 'r .m m:tim:gli4li_iiN'vn1_i,.t0._t,4at14*. Sor i,.,&.‘. t ' ,_,,li lam _ ,ii1)t.,i1..4_k w. • i. - riligiumii iprici• irg frgr41r . 1 \ a. 4..... -7, lir, , , . hi.4.A , ... •.40, • a ' • .ii Alga% - Al Imilybk IF lig• ,V . 1 .0 . -,-z-f., ifignigesminnia mirjt=Ai_40^. \ -- F-1111414/,' 4' 11417Ricl*6137;24.1111%killl .11411.'kg. Illilifir ‘.. \ • 1 .. , treAlle 114:;filff:4%..._141/".-4Aia/I- 4(°"Pl ir l'' a-a-, ., . \ it11, i. ,!,k rpAIIAN,_ a i , rfg '' '.*,4( iggiv - ��� : .. ,ram►,. ,� � .ii, --• , .:. 1._54-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION �►�LWIT III1O '' ;3.4 ISOPLUVIALS OF 50-YEAR 24-HOUR 1 Armgiriiiiilli TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES �• - Jam.$~u~ n" 741,4r-riigf = 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7- 6,miles •/.��9 V O M _ is soo,000 QC �3.5.1-12 1/90 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL SURE 3.5.1H 100-YEAR 24•HOUR ISOPLUVIALS - -: ;a RS '\' IL-retilif it-airg,,kilPtilb I v' ,., ,,,,,,. ‘ 3.4 i•,' Thdirit folli ‘ '' 1 k ,, :, .,06, ! i.= .-si..,4 ai , lk-- , Allia0.1 Millf"17 jair LA 14- ._014k .1 a? . a -ipmpi=r, - Al Ault _ . "i ' i, ie4111111rAk &alTiPir ii iLify 1 4' VP, It *4414gairliMih t; IR iflaadaileil it VII / I/ ' voit:tmillog.„,zas ralififtwilaidajw --_1.11,4.--44iipt*.oldr- / wootwiarA.,Now jpv Filif 4 i -74Vati;it"V 114111111 -- ' .V . r ' i \ , tisik,,, ,,r1,7,0,10 jii _mdkitiA, ,.1,„t,,,,, t, ..,,,, 1 4, 1 %All:04pr.- wok I,' . I %' :- \ .0:6 AV A f I" .5 "tk -Sim . ,L 4.4 ' .\. IN„ .s'riSiall. „ ' "ifliiitlimiliger"juntirltlinlaer c'; '11 a' Ali i . Irif#,Z%11911Mplit. _01101 0 :4'5 ' A .I.OVI ‘-' illkji.,Adide#441401 "411riitv. ° V ' 4.--itgit, ' ' iiit . *-9' oyay..-5-4 .04tarsili„,„"z-- _,. .... --- -_:4;..-. .._ NI 44 11 ItiliVAILV410111 4k,P 44*:.4re..filig.°11. 1bi 'l.... wiLlitIllajilig.Adji--44,:.4 , r i Aikpattalla iv lir --- i kip - -41.,:,:_- ___04zi _ _ r -,.... a \ A v W.L'At 7vappzb,. . I ,f,_.. . . .i..tr N.14 ' o„ , - Atitiktm%,Alittomilitox 1,,,, h. //J. , .,..dit 6 Jib i iiiiii . .140.447011Vt :114 bi--Ark_ ,"*...\! %„ \ Plifiti:311k4:1441111lik." 1,°6';IL,\I VIP , : ' f rig c's"- -401iitiftiriiitalipos , ik N, / ,..:1‘4,,,.i,,...,„, . _, , \ . - _ _ ....... ,, jr.,ito itiotranismilpitiklor,..,„�� , .. 1 i UPP*4 lwirir Illiptib-All 414NM' linitja,-,iii—Ziff ' r 411 mrm la% N;_,..t. ‘ If ; \ F.--iipip6 _ 11, �, ano• L- *VA War r Al C .=.all - - - :L. / 10611111Wh Iligiiterelki4 *iltf = ‘:\ 1 .. , /\•\ 4.40441-11 4111 'mope* 1 441iti -- AfM If . prii,it =1E,` -\''-- rirAFP 111"It; •rvpatrai.. ..4 _i /,... -.. A_ . \_,4. _ . y-- 1111 1 4%,,w 411 - - i ' ,,,,'crok • VrirAd'At , igat 1 0'' =.AR24-HOUR PRECIPITATION O 14414WAVSNA�I '`� 6.5. 3.4—�ISOPLUVIALS OF 100-YEAR 24HOUR O Wattai''� ¢ 4' TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES Q► �0 -� / I O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Miles 43 3.5.1-13 Or y0 1- t_ 1:300.000 • 1/90 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL -+ TGURE 3.5.1I 100-YEAR 7-DAY ISOPLUVIALS (5!c7---"1-47'''.717497 ' . N , ..' , .\ • -fr ,- i --. ., .‘.• ; , _ I n ad -: ' r , • •-'.'el 77.1: •'''' ----..; I' .7.-...:‘: - i !. V':::,,,, .. 0.4 •2 ' .iy! • 9.8.6:6 .. , .1 IF, - - , , ,, , , ._. -L.. -,..... wiluw,. @ -' i ' a 1 .ten r. s. \• i F � •�� :ro�Or1fY r. \ '\ i Iqq / . 1 • 1 \. li_ Yir ."'1411%&';0-: .<4111.144 // *''''7... -- '•(-. f' 4r i. . N: 'i_.4' - / ..i ....,-IimizilliP-- - - ', ---- 1 ' - --.-.. ,-,,, "sitit, . - 1 A. - -.,,„ 44k744-11Trt-E --',.....N .4.E - - 0011".7 Or''... -..tz . 1 ..- vrcm, .: ,...... , 41r.A..."-- .0., _.,,,, ........110,0, i i ,. ...: ,1\11 , „,,,,t.,1 v. iv � / alk, nifilV-- -----=-0-N--• it it 1 �� O , , 1-516111"L •,11k.‘ 1::. Agi \\: ,/- 4k. :-:_,Iki _.•_ 40111;.:• t ____,, pot, •Kri .1#l, .#t it40,glm111.. -;.l•'m ,--I42st_- i 11:r....1_4,.1 - ) ■i.r-2f1 !u.t11sE1r f11011 t1i 11 mil :`, ,�t �:� `4 44-*---*.1i,1(;•1,\.N\.i 1 i,s. -. h\„A,A,s I;%I_'1AN‘!-rIi.iI q _ 11 ;ii i i,. ...1.i...r. 1 d.• ri.1 :o -••i•t roN".i,lni 1kti..A.(.L1.N: i•#-,_—.., ,0It.:1°-..* .........).: t• 1 .1 � k. s 111ist.1il)hFl.b.=--.V_,.'' 1 A11ii1;1 41,4pl•1i7,1 ail/#pi1 I.f, R fl-kt ,:\t l---,_,=/ Ii m4 �- .... Is VIM- lak- ‘ te . / i I • ''‘i PfilliNelli I-- ' ,t. ...-.. " IP' - iim, 1=1 --)/ AL Mk - • - -4. ,.. APlirg 17 -. . . \ - ailliAllirdli ., i .>,- \, . ...,. i 4,77 --"I'''.-/\ ,44,4e5Mitilik• 1011 0.111' o --77-: k cr--7 1_.- - c? is.;,,,...„,./...:_._.,5::; .„.f. , imajiiimp , az:. wiiirm• ,, A li ply , ., .... ,.... ..., - , • 1 11 )-.1Y,, Ft;114!, ...,`II 1=,---_,,-1111111Mg„,ilit i h. '''-i_,./ .. •- c;)1' ,i. . lie , ,L,-.c ON '' ---.1.,74ete.g LH • 1 _ 100-YEAR 7-DAY PRECIPITATIONcb. [� : ' 1.4 ----ISOPLUVIALS OF 100-YEAR 7-DAY Qiiiiiliiiirilk \ � ; " ��'. R % ' 15,0 . TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHE • S i D7: 1 :� - • 14.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mlles Q' O,L �\ O b � �� is 300,000 3.5.1-14 '� O -.1.-1..... .— ' 1.... 1/90 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TABLE 3.5.2B SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS 3 SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS (Published by SCS in 1982) Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural, suburban and urban land use for Type 1A rainfall distribution, 24-hour storm duration. CURVE NUMBERS BY HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP LAND USE DESCRIPTION AB CD Cultivated Iand(1): winter condition 86 91 94 95 Mountain open areas: low growing brush and grasslands 74 82 89 92 Meadow or pasture: _ 65 78 O 89 Wood or forest land: undisturbed or older second growth 42 64 76 81 Wood or forest land: young second growth or brush 55 72 81 86 Orchard: with cover crop 81 88 92 94 Open spaces, lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, landscaping. good condition: grass cover on 75% or more of the area 68 80 86 90 fair condition: grass cover on 50% _. to 75% of the area 77 85 90 92 Gravel roads and parking lots 76 85 191 91 Dirt roads and parking lots 72 82 89 • Impervious surfaces, pavement, roofs, etc. 98 98 98 98 Open water bodies: lakes, wetlands, ponds, etc. 100 100 100 100 • Single Family Residential (2) Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre % Impervious (3) 1.0 DU/GA 15 Separate curve number 1.5 DU/GA 20 shall be selected 2.0 DU/GA 25 for pervious and 2.5 DU/GA 30 impervious portion 3.0 DU/GA 34 of the site or basin • 3.5 DU/GA 38 4.0 DU/GA 42 4.5 DU/GA 46 5.0 DU/GA 48 5.5 DU/GA 50 6.0 DU/GA 52 6.5 DU/GA 54 7.0 DU/GA 56 Planned unit developments, % impervious condominiums, apartments, must be computed commercial business and • industrial areas. (1) For a more detailed description of agricultural land use curve numbers refer to National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9, August 1972. (2) Assumes roof and driveway runoff is directed into street/storm system. (3) The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good condition for these curve numbers. • 3.5.2-3 11/92 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL (2) CN values can be area weighted when they apply to pervious areas of similar CN's (within 20 CN points). However, high CN areas should not be combined with low CN areas (unless the low CN areas are less than 15% of the subbasin). In this case, separate hydrographs should be generated and summed to form one hydrograph. FIGURE 3.5.2A HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP OF THE SOILS IN KING COUNTY • HYDROLOGIC HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP GROUP* SOIL GROUP GROUP* -Alderwood C Orcas Peat D Arents, Alderwood Material C Oridia D Arents, Everett Material B Ovall C Beattsite C Pilchuck C Bellingham D Puget D Briscot D Puyallup B Buckley D Ragnar B Coastal Beaches Variable Renton D Earlmont Silt Loam D Riverwash Variable Edgewick C Salal C Everett A IB °Sammamish D Indianola A Seattle D Kitsap C Shacar D Klaus C Si Silt C Mixed Alluvial Land Variable Snohomish D Neilton A Sultan C Newberg B Tukwila D Nooksack C Urban Variable • Normal Sandy Loam D Woodinville D HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP CLASSIFICATIONS A. (Low runoff potential). Soils having high infiltration rates, even when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of deep,well-to-excessively drained sands or gravels. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. B. (Moderately low runoff potential). Soils having moderate infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of moderately fine to moderately coarse textures. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. C. (Moderately high runoff potential). Soils having slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of soils with a layer that impedes downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine to fine textures. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. D. (High runoff potential). Soils having very slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of clay soils with a high swelling potential, soils with a permanent high water table, soils with a hardpan or clay layer at or near the surface, and shallow soils over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. * From SCS,TR-55, Second Edition,June 1986, Exhibit A-1. Revisions made from SCS, Soil Interpretation Record. Form #5,September 1988. • • 3.5.2-2 11/92 • S 8835 4• 4,39 w . 'In, \ v m4 ��36% \ � w ?4°1`a l ,r"fit r ‘ ;j a i 4 �`\ ,,, � / �. ' \ I I ,� l Z�m 331, 1 , ( ,;21. .. ,-, -8). M 0„ P4'3 i i I, 1e:: '-‘,. l',z...."v14,. \\ •vt tSsN,;.N> — 4' ,9. I\ g.1 /7 d y -,.... \‘ 1 AI i 13 V „. ....,„..--.-,,, ,...... _, s , \ il ,1A k , 1 ..,k,..„,. ..,„, . 73. `___.> .=r- :., t ' aia Il;�`\I\I r 1 i\ ;Jl/i7I R r" . ' ( ifs • ;,'- � l \ 11{1,"aF J} � r \ilf o A p l • 0) �,w., \ 1 t s 41111 t li,11 \ `A \\II �,; 00 -_-- n �`5'';:1` " Eft \ tpii - i::.:,11--4' ,--,1 1. \ !IN \, \,., ' ,,,! P.: N: `��I 1(�1 IFS11: \\ \ c�0 0 ((104+ L \ wt • . Z • IA ,, _ i, 11 i t\t ��7.lFfi 2 III, , li p �t1 , , A ° e , O � (� i 1 u 71 III ijEi t �';$ w II ,;j\ i ,..'"' \,\ ti llik 03 cji ;1!`4 / II, i ig ; c III A 1 \.. . i�� III n" -' f \�.. tt1i 1 t^^^• ep IIt i.:, . -ems ,\ \ I i; • {i I, II 1 till r I ) { (\ ll rr Il g. ` \t1 • AC l t �\ � r II i � ® "4, 1 1 w j 1 \ { 1` ' / jit0,4l1 i N IILi1 rr { r.L,� Ili 11111, . w • II o •( { 1 I • D n N m i e i' I\ i A 1 1t 1 ' I•�t j : 1 t I .f� ` `EI �l,^.' ...�jt t1 7�e, L- WCs) II 1 I _/.�\\ n , / I t�� ,,!//:t/ /,.:4.1 .. Z t ."",!! t rah' • I*••• / 2-'-7^-• 'Ail"11 ‘ vtg L Z Z • s II rr s i# , �) J r,l:%J!/ I I :,'t., 4i ' I j r 1 II \' u u O ca �, E4,1 ll II r4 +a fig j - .:,--.i— ( 5t,• t''4 - . .-a461) . Li , ti;�� ��t § y. Z ^..: 00 -u m c0 No. I Date I By I Ckd. I Appr. I Revision Job Number JMH Scale: Title: FIGURE 3 �.G'HA(o 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH Designed 3555 mQ"�, ,. 0Z(4 5)251-62222 Drawn JMH Horizontal EXISTING DRAINAGE BASIN �. Checked JMH 1"=100' Sheet ; blip' _ (425)251-8782 FAX For: t' ', .. 4. Approved HPG Vertical CI' co CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, N/A G A R Y M E R L I N O C O N S T RUCTION Gar ., SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Date 6/27/01 LNG ENG�N� REN TON, WA. of i File: P:\SDSKPROJ\3555\engineering\3555—x1.dwg Date/Time: 06/27/2001 14:14 Scale: 1=100 Joe Xrefs: Z3555—T, • \NO iAREA UNDISTURBED AND UNDETAINED WETLANDS = 0.47 ACRES� ; BRUSH AND GRASS = 0.67 ACRES • \NS- ` 0.20 SQUARE FEET 0.20 ACRES �+�,� o)-4,,itv"---• — ed.-144riiri?. . ,sik\ _ ann I'.s \ 11)) ,:,.€.7,1.\ ,\AZ.C5:11,1..r '•:•:• \ \ W14. \ L .:•::::•-•.:2::::.. -.,. „ s,..;2.-tpk.......,.• ••-_,,, \ illi*, \ • • .*F ... .........- ‘ \ • ••qr •%Y.'. ,i;\\ ‘111 ., . \ ‘=, \\''.: 4.,0\--1\Y11::Ze:-./ irt*:::N\Ali 1 '\\ ‘1,\:k..,,,_.• . ...,,,,4 4> Ivo, 1 \ , t \ 4..4"/Api.T ..!, \\‘ks7\.110\ :-,,i,1,. .`„,_ ___.. 1,1,41tiii„.:,... A,i\.4kN\ligt,:\\0 4* \\\-\' -s'k;N \N \Vr,�, , �I li \'\ - �\ TOTAL EXIS ING CONDITIONS \ \\ \ g �n���_CLl1 'p\\ �\h , DRAINAGE BASIN = 18.07 ACRES \\ \\ \ \\ \\ ARF 15630QE FEET 0.36 ACRES \\• \ 48 1 CR U.' ET ;t;ta1 \\ \' ` kik \ \ '� \ ? .A., ,'I �\ . �r iy / � A \ -,, 4, \ \ \ \ \.\'+ \k\\ t., : itivk , \ \ ��\\\ \ • • \ �N So�uAaE\jE \\\� \Z‘i$0, \� \ \' , 0.87 acl \s\\ \` \\\\\y \ ; \'- '. € \ \\\ \1'\• �lk 1\ \\ �Z \ a`° I* ., 4 ,. � 1 \ '' ‘116 A • `\ \ \ \ '�\\ '. �J����` \ .,.. N N. N , ..0\''45. • ,:tt.; _ EXISTING CONDITIONS _:, „zu <-�'-� `� SCALE 1"=200 \ s AI .q.j.',, -- -... 04• s4.39 • ..Ni• -4. • Jr/ - . .... ..1 IF ..',... ..,,, ••-.. 01 1.741 *S2 r&IC,C )4.. ,. z 0 r• ' •.• 4t . „ ' : / ' 1rg • t/ ...,..,,,..,•2., , 2 m I I i sty,:',...:Wr ---1 4v '''.\1...kp tt,•i'2.:21,7?,, . i' M Or.‘ 1 i I 1 t•if:'<-,. -----:, . ...h14:VI 4rg!-,A...,,,„ .5,, i- ; / L • ,t. .., „lviii, , i , 1 .,,, , ,...,..,,...*,,..., if,.. A3 i ,,4 .:4 4K t''' .= \sk:)°` 0 z t' Tr4 P , I N. 04‘ N '' • ,,,!1•11 r, r 1 [ i. ot•,\-%\,.., i .. ......., .... - .,:---- „ ,lzig \Ic" . 12 t t /I \ , / '''I . ., 1 i '*g $; •‘‘`1 .; 't i. '' i,01'•'..'22 • . 1 '• st„......S, ‘ )122•2 2;•'.% Ii.2•, •4''''1 , , 1 „;•, b 1 ...t10 1 11,1 1 1 \ I 'tip % 051 ' ii.on' 1414 , \ ) \VII(--.\\ \‘‘,‘, A .. \I \ I Itilli '' . 11" 0 ,a' •:ta ,.. . i 1 t I si,r, %.,„ • • _.00 • ————————-1-1-11111!t ,,..!...\\\s'ii:'1,i,i1\!1.. \III\.() till1111\iIi1:'l,(i,,it,11\1,'Itfi.,;,\L\\\:0 l'\,;,.,...\\...:.,‘,.‘.'.‘:‘ ,,‘.,',v,..,‘1,.-‘..,",,11...::‘\11,-.4elip..\71.'-----,: —E1,9.......;::,,,:, .'. IT:C 77:11 atz ...,i IU "*Ilt\ I Zr 11 i\ .'iM \1 i.t 'i , . ( 1 T z > , ... ii,, . ig,.: - . ;i ; - \\\ :1 ,......---1 -• 1 ‘\- ./ Itii\ -,... tii __......... . co ,, / 4 , ,. 0 r_ ., .0: it. , ,,.\I P r 11 % 1 piiii ., 0 ii ii. ei 8 4: II 0 b N r ill „, A t.), '1.'1. / Il I ki 1 ..-0; `.. A 0 \-... 1 ,,, .\\k < 1 -1. ) il ‘ '11-----r\-;'1 )` \ \ ''‘k 1 e` . II 1 i :: / k g H 11 1 1 , r i n \. x , . v., .1q ,,,,/ ii li i ei .i.,4,. / p i 1 I / /i 1 sitli C..I 0 11 I '' I , N\ 1 g /1 ' , J : I I ' iii-,_/ 1, g• Li II 1 I I I / ( 'N 4 f* 1 I //''Z,-7 ,'.'''" /ii . . II I • I / I I [rr,(,---.::-.... (, ,t1, , (i) 11 • t 1 .. le • 11 ,,,:-. ii 11 , j. ,. c Ppf , 1 \\0,\ I .. 4',44 k 4 N) 0 cA ir II .1 , I / "4 I .\\1 ' • t (D (D CD M 1.3 vi- i 1.2 ,i 1 1..02-•;hi. ,s 0.,,.,•••' .........- ii r , % i 11 / I 1 i k,.":""'AV /I :.••-'..24 'y _d.„....,"'' 0 P) IV < i I /.--\‘;1 /1 /k>,/Ili', 0 0 > M •ll \ 'II \,,' ik, , \I / , . ...,..s, Z Z 0 r—r, • 1•3 l' ' ";:.''-;/4-it'!!k: . ....1 • ‘.., (0. II '<, i itit\ 1 ) .,.4.;,,;;-4 ,,,-‘ (-.\ /Al.,' . ' ..:I o ',....1. ,4111r ...1.;\Y,I;'' ! ••"-Iq V,-/--/-67., Q 1 I .,:..,...,...... , .. kt 00 1, i i i i 1 A t'S -,, 'eV...S''' -1 r I ..trii•:ri,, :,,‘ ••!'• . ••••••'''••—• i'' 1 1 • iz.b eii. __._ • __ __ 'N. li i - , R "I?..4..:',..,:,. 4 §4 `.', ... ..A.a. .... _f.' 1:. › › P P W ... °... °..N Z P) n CO CO C < ..1 al 0 %aro • .........0 No. I Date 1 By 1 Ckd. I Appr. I Revision Job Number GHA(/ Title: , Scale: FIGURE 4 dI Designed JMH 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH 3555 , it A iii 0 KENT, WA 98032 Drawn Mil Horizontal DEVELOPED DRAINAGE BASIN 10 f, — Z(425)251-6222 da` -- Checked JMH 1 =100' Sheet 7.) -..,,, -Tr '4'.' (425)251-8782 FAX ..._ 0For: °A -:fri":"` - Approved HPG Vertical .. CML ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, Date 6/27/01 N/A GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION si.,„ _st,t,' SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1 1 "G ENGII" F1ENTON WA. . . of P File: P;\SOSKPROJ\3555\engineering\3555—x2.dwg Date/Time: 06/27/2001 15:24 Scale: 1=100 Joe Xrefs: Z3555—T, I . . 1 • ' . . • , 1 i AREA UNDISTURBED & UNDETAINED WETLANDS = 0.47 ACRES BRUSH & GRASS = 0.67 ACRES , .N... 8502 SQUARE FEET . 0.20 ACRES . 1 . . . ‘ . 1, aW—U MSDIVIVIO al MUM ‘1111/11'L----;I•4 .‘!. \ . • ar..or•srm = \ . •....\, •\t\ . .."..."*.,". ..". 441.111111.'1ARE''‘A,-D\EV.41.= \' '•: \ 321908 SQUARE FEET \\ 7.39 ACRES 0 f IN IS• 37 . tt ' V, \ \\ 15630 SQUARE FEET'E FEET 0.36 ACRES 70012 \ ...% ‘ i at L 1.61 ACRES .. „. ,._..-.0% . Wiitz:iiiii-z3 '• Aiiibv.! 42-) • L 67954 SQUARE FEET .. •. 280037 SQUARE FEET % 1.16 ACRES '-.,6.43 AC \ \%:\ ,. . • A., N.....L. _ • • . . .. • ' s' . ,, \. , i . 'A •,. I . , ' ( . „ , . I . .. .. ,:,.. ' . . A ' '••:1,.. . % \ • .'''s'-- A \ _:,..: '--.,:,.. '•-•'. .1""-- -lb. • ... . •. .. • ' , . ., "..a. \ • DEVELOPED CONDITIONS .... . -. .:.. ... ,.. ,_ .,... SCALE 1"=200' ,• • • • BARGHAUSEN DATE: PAGE OF CONSULTING ENGINEER: ENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT#: PROJECT/SUBJECT: - -- I L - +gtkilf.4:10 . I i i i o l t �r, rz...- ......... ......._ ......._.._.._.._._...__ ...._....... _lkt 1._..641. i I i i _....._ ...-..__..._.._..__...._..._._..._... -' ... __.._.. r _ - 1 i 1 v ;t - OEV3 -1 Zy, i 4 s ,► • 1 i � i , 1 irrAR_ ,!-- , _ i A 7- I 1 1 60 CATZ-Ls- 4-) I 1 I I 11 m s 6 1 -, , :.......:. 1 1 'N P�Deo&a S -I 0 v Its 1 i [... I I ' ' 1 1 , i: j*T a.......__.._.___....__._..........__._..._....... i......_......._._ _.._.__ 1 1 i i i I t i .1 . 1 i �_ 1 1 ! 1 1 1 y i 7/2/01 3 :45 : 18 pm Shareware Release page 14 1 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 1 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMEX1-2 NAME: REID MIDDLETON EX1-2YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 .26 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 2 .26 Acres 0 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN 81 . 00 0 . 00 TC 18 . 69 min 0 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 170 . 00 ns : 0 .4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 1650 TcReach - Shallow L: 280 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0430 PEAK RATE : 0 . 19 cfs VOL: 0 . 11 Ac-ft TIME : 510 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 610 0.0966 910 0.0769 1210 0.0635 1510 20 320 620 0.0949 920 0.0755 1220 0.0637 1520 30 330 630 0.0943 930 0.0751 1230 0.0638 1530 40 340 640 0.0917 940 0.0755 1240 0.0640 1540 50 350 650 0.0890 950 0.0761 1250 0.0643 1550 60 360 660 0.0882 960 0.0762 1260 0.0644 1560 70 370 670 0.0865 970 0.0747 1270 0.0646 1570 80 380 680 0.0848 980 0.0732 1280 0.0648 1580 90 390 690 0.0843 990 0.0727 1290 0.0649 1590 100 400 700 0.0838 1000 0.0731 1300 0.0651 1600 110 410 710 0.0835 1010 0.0735 1310 0.0654 1610 120 420 720 0.0833 1020 0.0737 1320 0.0654 1620 130 430 0.0035 730 0.0827 1030 0.0741 1330 0.0657 1630 140 440 0.0071 740 0.0821 1040 0.0746 1340 0.0659 1640 150 450 0.0084 750 0.0819 1050 0.0746 1350 0.0659 1650 160 460 0.0185 760 0.0811 1060 0.0730 1360 0.0639 1660 170 470 0.0290 770 0.0803 1070 0.0712 1370 0.0617 1670 180 480 0.0336 780 0.0800 1080 0.0707 1380 0.0611 1680 190 490 0.1021 790 0.0791 1090 0.0710 1390 0.0611 1690 200 500 0.1737 800 0.0781 1100 0.0714 1400 0.0613 1700 210 510 0.1931 810 0.0778 1110 0.0714 1410 0.0614 1710 ' 220 520 0.1740 820 0.0785 1120 0.0696 1420 0.0616 1720 230 530 0.1500 830 0.0793 1130 0.0677 1430 0.0617 1730 240 540 0.1431 840 0.0795 1140 0.0672 1440 0.0615 1740 250 550 0.1327 850 0.0784 1150 0.0674 1450 0.0389 1750 260 560 0.1231 860 0.0772 1160 0.0677 1460 0.0100 1760 270 570 0.1203 870 0.0768 1170 0.0678 1470 0.0017 1770 280 580 0.1108 880 0.0774 1180 0.0659 1480 1780 290 590 0.1014 890 0.0780 1190 0.0639 1490 1790 300 600 0.0988 900 0.0782 1200 0.0633 1500 1800 I 7/2/01 3 :45 : 18 pm Shareware Release page 13 MONSTER ROAD SITE i GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMEX1-10 NAME: REID MIDDLETON EX1-10YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 2 . 26 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 2 . 26 Acres 0 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN 81 . 00 0 . 00 TC 18 . 69 min 0 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 170 . 00 ns : 0 .4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 1650 TcReach - Shallow L: 280 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0430 PEAK RATE: 0 . 53 cfs VOL: 0 . 22 Ac-ft TIME: 510 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 610 0.2016 910 0.1432 1210 0.1129 1510 20 320 620 0.1959 920 0.1402 1220 0.1132 1520 30 330 630 0.1942 930 0.1393 1230 0.1133 1530 40 340 0.0020 640 0.1873 940 0.1398 1240 0.1136 1540 50 350 0.0040 650 0.1804 950 0.1405 1250 0.1139 1550 60 360 0.0048 660 0.1784 960 0.1406 1260 0.1140 1560 70 370 0.0122 670 0.1737 970 0.1376 1270 0.1142 1570 80 380 0.0200 680 0.1692 980 0.1343 1280 0.1145 1580 90 390 0.0224 690 0.1679 990 0.1334 1290 0.1146 1590 100 400 0.0331 700 0.1661 1000 0.1338 1300 0.1149 1600 110 410 0.0440 710 0.1644 1010 0.1343 1310 0.1151 1610 120 420 0.0475 720 0.1639 1020 0.1345 1320 0.1152 1620 130 430 0.0635 730 0.1619 1030 0.1350 1330 0.1155 1630 140 440 0.0798 740 0.1599 1040 0.1356 1340 0.1157 1640 150 450 0.0849 750 0.1593 1050 0.1356 1350 0.1157 1650 160 460 0.1075 760 0.1571 1060 0.1324 1360 0.1120 1660 170 470 0.1304 770 0.1549 1070 0.1289 1370 0.1080 1670 180 480 0.1407 780 0.1542 1080 0.1279 1380 0.1069 1680 190 490 0.3081 790 0.1517 1090 0.1282 1390 0.1069 1690 200 500 0.4831 800 0.1492 1100 0.1286 1400 0.1071 1700 210 510 0.5300 810 0.1486 1110 0.1287 1410 0.1072 1710 220 520 0.4508 820 0.1494 1120 0.1252 1420 0.1074 1720 230 530 0.3580 830 0.1503 1130 0.1216 1430 0.1076 1730 240 540) 0.3316 840 0.1505 1140 0.1206 1440 0.1072 1740 250'• 550 0.2994 850 0.1480 1150 0.1208 1450 0.0678 1750 260 560 0.2705 860 0.1452 1160 0.1211 1460 0.0174 1760 270 570 0.2620 870 0.1444 1170 0.1212 1470 0.0030 1770 280 580 0.2382 880 0.1451 1180 0.1176 1480 1780 290 590 0.2148 890 0.1459 1190 0.1139 1490 1790 300 600 0.2082 900 0.1460 1200 0.1128 1500 1800 7/2/01 3 :45 : 19 pm Shareware Release page 15 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMEX1100 NAME: REID MIDDLETON EX1-100YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 .26 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 95 inches AREA. . : 2 . 26 Acres 0 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN 81 . 00 0 . 00 TC • 18 . 69 min 0 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 170 . 00 ns : 0 .4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 1650 TcReach - Shallow L: 280 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0430 PEAK RATE: 1 . 00 cfs VOL: 0 . 38 Ac-ft TIME : 510 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 0.0176 610 0.3362 910 0.2244 1210 0.1723 1510 20 320 0.0278 620 0.3250 920 0.2193 1220 0.1726 1520 30 330 0.0310 630 0.3216 930 0.2179 1230 0.1727 1530 40 340 0.0430 640 0.3090 940 0.2183 1240 0.1730 1540 50 350 0.0552 650 0.2963 950 0.2190 1250 0.1733 1550 60 360 0.0590 660 0.2926 960 0.2191 1260 0.1734 1560 70 370 0.0727 670 0.2840 970 0.2141 1270 0.1737 1570 80 380 0.0865 680 0.2757 980 0.2088 1280 0.1740 1580 90 390 0.0909 690 0.2733 990 0.2073 1290 0.1741 1590 100 400 0.1104 700 0.2695 1000 0.2076 1300 0.1743 1600 110 410 0.1301 710 0.2659 1010 0.2082 1310 0.1746 1610 120 420 0.1364 720 0.2648 1020 0.2084 1320 0.1747 1620 130 430 0.1652 730 0.2610 1030 0.2089 1330 0.1750 1630 140 440 0.1944 740 0.2571 1040 0.2095 1340 0.1752 1640 150 450 0.2035 750 0.2559 1050 0.2095 1350 0.1752 1650 160 460 0.2419 760 0.2517 1060 0.2043 1360 0.1694 1660 170 470 0.2808 770 0.2475 1070 0.1987 1370 0.1633 1670 180 480 0.2989 780 0.2462 1080 0.1971 1380 0.1616 1680 190 490 0.5998 790 0.2418 1090 0.1973 1390 0.1615 1690 200 500 0.9146 800 0.2373 1100 0.1977 1400 0.1617 1700 210 510 0.9982 810 0.2361 1110 0.1978 1410 0.1618 1710 220 520 0.8307 820 0.2369 1120 0.1923 1420 0.1620 1720 230 530 0.6373 830 0.2380 1130 0.1866 1430 0.1622 1730 240 540 0.5824 840 0.2382 1140 0.1850 1440 0.1615 1740 250 550 0.5192 850 0.2337 1150 0.1851 1450 0.1023 1750 260 560 0.4632 860 0.2289 1160 0.1854 1460 0.0263 1760 270 570 0.4469 870 0.2276 1170 0.1854 1470 0.0045 1770 280 0.0032 580 0.4035 880 0.2281 1180 0.1798 1480 1780 290 0.0065 590. 0.3610 890 0.2290 1190 0.1740 1490 1790 300 0.0077 600 0.3490 900 0.2291 1200 0.1723 1500 1800 7/2/01 3 :45 : 19 pm Shareware Release page 17 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMEX2-2 NAME: REID MIDDLETON EX2-2YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 11 .20 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 11 . 15 Acres 0 . 05 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN 91 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 14 . 70 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 130 . 00 ns : 0 .4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 1690 TcReach - Shallow L: 170 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0590 PEAK RATE: 2 . 94 cfs VOL: 1 . 05 Ac-ft TIME : 510 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 0.1270 610 0.9121 910 0.5940 1210 0.4548 1510 20 320 0.1518 620 0.8852 920 0.5825 1220 0.4553 1520 30 330 0.1569 630 0.8797 930 0.5807 1230 0.4554 1530 40 340 0.2027 640 0.8320 940 0.5827 1240 0.4562 1540 i 50 350 0.2312 650 0.8022 950 0.5839 1250 0.4567 1550 60 360 0.2368 660 0.7968 960 0.5839 1260 0.4568 1560 70 370 0.2879 670 0.7648 970 0.5645 1270 0.4576 1570 80 380 0.3195 680 0.7452 980 0.5527 1280 0.4581 1580 90 390 0.3262 690 0.7416 990 0.5507 1290 0.4582 1590 100 0.0004 400 0.4010 700 0.7276 1000 0.5524 1300 0.4590 1600 110 0.0004 410 0.4473 710 0.7189 1010 0.5534 1310 0.4594 1610 120 0.0004 420 0.4571 720 0.7172 1020 0.5536 1320 0.4595 1620 130 0.0010 430 0.5666 730 0.7021 1030 0.5551 1330 0.4603 1630 140 0.0010 440 0.6347 740 0.6927 1040 0.5561 1340 0.4607 1640 150 0.0010 450 0.6483 750 0.6909 1050 0.5559 1350 0.4604 1650 160 0.0015 460 0.7913 760 0.6749 1060 0.5360 1360 0.4390 1660 i 170 0.0015 470 0.8795 770 0.6650 1070- 0.5236 1370 0.4257 1670 180 0.0015 480 0.9183 780 0.6630 1080 0.5216 1380 0.4235 1680 190 0.0018 490 2.0993 790 0.6463 1090 0.5229 1390 0.4241 1690 200 0.0018 500 2.8351 800 0.6359 1100 0.5237 1400 0.4245 1700 210 0.0018 510 2.9438 810 0.6342 1110 0.5235 1410 0.4246 1710 220 0.0021 520 2.1683 820 0.6373 1120 0.5030 1420 0.4251 1720 230 0.0021 530 1.6916 , 830 0.6392 1130 0.4904 1430 0.4255 1730 240 0.0023 540 1.6088 840 0.6391 1140 0.4883 1440 0.4237 1740 250 0.0171 550 1.3920 850 0.6214 1150 0.4894 1450 0.1966 1750 260 0.0261 560 1.2576 860 0.6104 1160 0.4900 1460 0.0287 1760 270 0.0283 570 1.2325 870 0.6087 1170 0.4898 1470 1770 280 0.0618 580 1.0725 880 0.6111 1180 0.4690 1480 1780 290 0.0827 590 0.9730 890 0.6127 1190 0.4561 1490 1790 300 0.0867 600 0.9559 900 0.6126 1200 0.4540 1500 - 1800 7/2/01 3 :45 : 19 pm Shareware Release page 16 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMEX2-10 NAME: REID MIDDLETON EX2-10YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 11 . 20 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 11 . 15 Acres 0 . 05 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 91 . 00 98 . 00 TC 14 . 70 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 130 . 00 ns : 0 .4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 . s : 0 . 1690 TcReach - Shallow L: 170 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0590 PEAK RATE: 5 . 27 cfs VOL: 1 . 79 Ac-ft TIME : 510 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 0.4033 610 1.5064 910 0.9399 1210 0.7067 1510 20 320 0.4484 620 1.4574 920 0.9209 1220 0.7071 1520 30 330 0.4575 630 1.4476 930 0.9178 1230 0.7072 1530 40 340 0.5370 640 1.3640 940 0.9198 1240 0.7080 1540 50 350 0.5866 650 1.3118 950 0.9210 1250 0.7085 1550 60 ' 360 0.5962 660 1.3024 960 0.9207 1260 0.7085 1560 70 0.0002 370 0.6817 670 1.2462 970 0.8891 1270 0.7093 1570 80 0.0002 380 0.7347 680 1.2116 980 0.8697 1280 0.7097 1580 90 0.0002 390 0.7459 690 1.2054 990 0.8666 1290 0.7098 1590 100 0.0013 400 0.8757 700 1.1794 1000 0.8681 1300 0.7105 1600 110 0.0013 410 0.9562 710 1.1631 1010 0.8691 1310 0.7109 1610 120 0.0013 420 0.9732 720 1.1600 1020 0.8693 1320 0.7110 1620 130 0.0022 430 1.1614 730 1.1328 1030 0.8708 1330 0.7117 1630 140 0.0022 440 1.2788 740 1.1160 1040 0.8717 1340 0.7121 1640 150 0.0022 450 1.3020 750 1.1127 1050 0.8712 1350 0.7116 1650 160 0.0029 460 1.5388 760 1.0845 1060 0.8391 1360 0.6781 1660 170 0.0029 470 1.6849 770 1.0671 1070 0.8193 1370 0.6573 1670 180 0.0033 480 1.7512 780 1.0637 1080 0.8160 1380 0.6539 1680 190 0.0262 490 3.8015 790 1.0349 1090 0.8172 1390 0.6544 1690 200 0.0403 500 5.0810 800 1.0169 1100 0.8180 1400 0.6548 1700 . 210 0.0435 510 5.2684 810 1.0140 1110 0.8176 1410 0.6548 1710 220 0.0922 520 3.8074 820 1.0170 1120 0.7849 1420 0.6554 1720 230 0.1225 530 2.9065 830 1.0188 1130 0.7648 1430 0.6557 1730 240 0.1285 540 2.7504 840 1.0185 1140 0.7615 1440 0.6529 1740 250 0.1798 550 2.3578 850 0.9887 1150 0.7624 1450 0.3031 1750 260 0.2116 560 2.1140 860 0.9701 1160 0.7630 1460 0.0443 1760 270 0.2182 570 2.0687 870 0.9671 1170 0.7626 1470 1770 280 0.2824 580 1.7896 880 0.9695 1180 0.7297 1480 1780 290 0.3224 590 1.6160 890 0.9710 1190 0.7092 1490 1790 300 0.3301 600 1.5860 900 0.9707 1200 0.7059 1500 1800 7/2/01 3 :45 : 19 pm Shareware Release page 18 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMEX2100 NAME: REID MIDDLETON EX2-100YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 11 . 20 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 95 inches AREA. . : 11 . 15 Acres 0 . 05 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN 91 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 14 . 70 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 130 . 00 ns : 0 .4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 1690 TcReach - Shallow L: 170 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0590 PEAK RATE: 8 . 07 cfs VOL: 2 . 69 Ac-ft TIME: 510 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 0.7979 610 2.2006 910 1.3397 1210 0.9970 1510 20 320 0.8669 620 2.1251 920 1.3119 1220 0.9974 1520 30 330 0.8807 630 2.1101 930 1.3074 1230 0.9975 1530 40 340 0.9984 640 1.9840 940 1.3091 1240 0.9982 1540 50 350 1.0721 650 1.9052 950 1.3102 1250 0.9986 1550 60 360 1.0862 660 1.8910 960 1.3097 1260 0.9987 1560 70 0.0008 370 1.2095 670 1.8062 970 1.2640 1270 0.9993 1570 80 0.0008 380 1.2860 680 1.7540 980 1.2358 1280 0.9997 1580 90 0.0009 390 1.3024 690 1.7446 990 1.2312 1290 0.9998 1590 100 0.0025 400 1.4956 700 1.7042 1000 1.2326 1300 1.0004 1600 110 0.0025 410 1.6157 710 1.6790 1010 1.2335 1310 1.0008 1610 120 0.0025 420 1.6409 720 1.6741 1020 1.2336 1320 1.0009 1620 130 0.0038 430 1.9202 730 1.6327 1030 1.2350 1330 1.0015 1630 140 0.0040 440 2.0945 740 1.6069 1040 1.2358 1340 1.0019 1640 150 0.0048 450 2.1289 750 1.6019 1050 1.2351 1350 1.0010 1650 160 0.0591 460 2.4720 760 1.5593 1060 1.1889 1360 0.9536 1660 170 0.0923 470 2.6839 770 1.5331 1070 1.1603 1370 0.9242 1670 180 0.0995 480 2.7823 780 1.5279 1080 1.1556 1380 0.9193 1680 190 0.1838 490 5.8642 790 1.4849 1090 1.1567 1390 0.9198 1690 200 0.2367 500 7.7892 800 1.4580 1100 1.1574 1400 0.9201 1700 210 0.2466 510 8.0694 810 1.4536 1110 1.1568 1410 0.9202 1710 220 0.3176 520 5.7675 820 1.4564 1120 1.1100 1420 0.9206 1720 230 0.3618 530 4.3462 830 1.4582 1130 1.0812 1430 0.9209 1730 240 0.3706 540 4.1002 840 1.4576 1140 1.0765 1440 0.9169 1740 250 0.4497 550 3.4959 850 1.4136 1150 1.0773 1450 0.4257 1750 • 260 0.4987 560 3.1202 860 1.3861 1160 1.0778 1460 0.0622 1760 270 0.5088 570 3.0505 870 1.3817 1170 1.0772 1470 1770 280 0.6105 580 2.6302 880 1.3839 1180 1.0302 1480 1780 290 0.6740 590 2.3683 890 1.3853 1190 1.0011 1490 1790 300 0.6862 600 2.3231 900 1.3847 1200 0.9963 1500 1800 7/2/01 3 :45 :20 pm Shareware Release page 20 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMEX3-2 NAME : REID MIDDLETON EX3-2YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ▪ 0 . 75 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE ▪ TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION ▪ 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 0 . 75 Acres 0 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN 91 . 00 0 . 00 TC 5 . 00 min 0 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 130 . 00 ns : 0 .4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 1690 TcReach - Shallow L: 170 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0590 PEAK RATE: 0 .20 cfs VOL: 0 . 07 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 0.0103 610 0.0589 910 0.0388 1210 0.0305 1510 20 320 0.0103 620 0.0589 920 0.0388 1220 0.0305 1520 30 330 0.0103 630 0.0588 930 0.0388 1230 0.0305 1530 40 340 0.0156 640 0.0533 940 0.0391 1240 0.0306 1540 50 350 0.0156 650 0.0533 950 0.0391 1250 0.0306 1550 60 360 0.0157 660 0.0533 960 0.0391 1260 0.0306 1560 70 370 0.0216 670 0.0496 970 0.0368 1270 0.0307 1570 80 380 0.0216 680 0.0496 980 0.0368 1280 0.0307 1580 90 390 0.0216 690 0.0496 990 0.0368 1290 0.0307 1590 100 400 0.0303 700 0.0480 1000 0.0370 1300 0.0308 1600 110 410 0.0303 710 0.0480 1010 0.0370 1310 0.0308 1610 120 420 0.0304 720 0.0480 1020 0.0370 1320 0.0308 1620 130 430 0.0430 730 0.0462 1030 0.0372 1330 0.0308 1630 140 440 0.0430 740 0.0462 1040 0.0372 1340 0.0308 1640 150 450 0.0432 750 0.0462 1050 0.0372 1350 0.0308 1650 160 460 0.0596 760 0.0444 1060 0.0349 1360 0.0283 1660 170 470 0.0596 770 0.0444 1070 0.0349 1370 0.0283 1670 180 480 0.0607 780 0.0444 1080 0.0349 1380 0.0283 1680 190 490 0.1974 790 0.0424 1090 0.0350 1390 0.0284 1690 200 500 0.1974 800 0.0424 1100 0.0350 1400 0.0284 1700 210 510 0.1967 810 0.0424 1110 0.0350 1410 0.0284 1710 220 520 0.1078 820 0.0428 1120 0.0327 1420 0.0285 1720 230 530 0.1078 830 0.0428 1130 0.0327 1430 0.0285 1730 240 540 0.1076 840 0.0428 1140 0.0327 1440 0.0283 1740 250 0.0017 550 0.0826 850 0.0407 1150 0.0328 1450 1750 260 0.0017 560 0.0826 860 0.0407 1160 0.0328 1460 1760 270 0.0017 570 0.0824 870 0.0407 1170 0.0328 1470 1770 280 0.0056 580 0.0640 880 0.0410 1180 0.0304 1480 1780 290 0.0056 590 0.0640 890 0.0410 1190 0.0304 1490 1790 300 0.0056 600 0.0639 900 0.0410 1200 0.0304 1500 1800 7/2/01 3 :45 :20 pm Shareware Release page 19 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMEX3-10 NAME: REID MIDDLETON EX3-10YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ▪ 0 . 75 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE ▪ TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION ▪ 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 . 75 Acres 0 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 91 . 00 0 . 00 TC • 5 . 00 min - 0 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 130 . 00 ns : 0 .4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 1690 TcReach - Shallow L: 170 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0590 PEAK RATE: 0 . 35 cfs VOL: 0 . 12 Ac-ft TIME : 490 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 0.0303 610 0.0970 910 0.0614 1210 0.0473 1510 20 320 0.0303 620 0.0970 920 0.0614 1220 0.0473 1520 30 330 0.0304 630 0.0969 930 0.0614 1230 0.0473 1530 40 340 0.0396 640 0.0872 940 0.0617 1240 0.0474 1540 50 350 0.0396 650 0.0872 950 0.0617 1250 0.0474 1550 60 360 0.0397 660 0.0871 960 0.0616 1260 0.0474 1560 70 370 0.0496 670 0.0807 970 0.0580 1270 0.0475 1570 80 380 0.0496 680 0.0807 980 0.0580 1280 0.0475 1580 90 390 0.0497 690 0.0807 990 0.0580 1290 0.0475 1590 100 400 0.0647 700 0.0777 1000 0.0582 1300 0.0476 1600 110 410 0.0647 710 0.0777 1010 0.0582 1310 0.0476 1610 120 420 0.0649 720 0.0776 1020 0.0582 1320 0.0476 1620 130 430 0.0867 730 0.0745 1030 0.0584 1330 0.0477 1630 140 440 0.0867 740 0.0745 1040 0.0584 1340 0.0477 1640 150 450 0.0869 750 0.0745 1050 0.0583 1350 0.0476 1650 160 460 0.1142 760 0.0712 1060 0.0546 1360 0.0438 1660 170 470 0.1142 770 0.0712 1070 0.0546 1370 0.0438 1670 180 480 0.1161 780 0.0712 1080 0.0546 1380 0.0438 1680 190 0.0026 490 0.3538 790 0.0679 1090 0.0548 1390 0.0438 1690 200 0.0026 500 0.3538 800 0.0679 1100 0.0548 1400 0.0438 1700 210 0.0027 510 0.3524 810 0.0679 1110 0.0547 1410 0.0438 1710 220 0.0083 520 0.1845 820 0.0682 1120 0.0510 1420 0.0439 1720 230 0.0083 530 0.1845 830 0.0682 1130 0.0510 1430 0.0439 1730 240 0.0084 540 0.1841 840 0.0682 1140 0.0510 1440 0.0435 1740 250 0.0143 550 0.1387 850 0.0647 1150 0.0511 1450 1750 260 0.0143 560 0.1387 860 0.0647 1160 0.0511 1460 1760 270 0.0144 570 0.1385 870 0.0647 1170 0.0511 1470 1770 280 0.0218 580 0.1062 880 0.0650 1180 0.0473 1480 1780 290 0.0218 590 0.1062 890 0.0650 1190 0.0473 1490 1790 300 0.0219 600 0.1061 900 0.0650 1200 0.0473 1500 1800 7/2/01 3 :45 :20 pm Shareware Release page 21 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMEX3100 NAME : REID MIDDLETON EX3-100YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0 . 75 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 95 inches AREA. . : 0 . 75 Acres 0 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN 91 . 00 0 . 00 TC • 5 . 00 min 0 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 130 . 00 ns : 0 .4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 1690 TcReach - Shallow L: 170 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0590 PEAK RATE: 0 . 54 cfs VOL: 0 . 18 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 0.0586 610 0.1414 910 0.0875 1210 0.0668 1510 20 320 0.0586 620 0.1414 920 0.0875 1220 0.0668 1520 30 330 0.0587 630 0.1413 930 0.0875 1230 0.0668 1530 40 340 0.0724 640 0.1267 940 0.0877 1240 0.0669 1540 50 350 0.0724 650 0.1267 950 0.0877 1250 0.0669 1550 1 60 360 0.0725 660 0.1266 960 0.0877 1260 0.0669 1560 70 370 0.0867 670 0.1168 970 0.0824 1270 0.0669 1570 80 380 0.0867 680 0.1168 980 0.0824 1280 0.0669 1580 90 390 0.0869 690 0.1168 990 0.0824 1290 0.0669 1590 100 400 0.1093 700 0.1121 1000 0.0826 1300 0.0670 1600 110 410 0.1093 710 0.1121 1010 0.0826 1310 0.0670 1610 120 420 0.1095 720 0.1121 1020 0.0826 1320 0.0670 1620 130 430 ' 0.1419 730 0.1073 1030 0.0827 1330 0.0671 1630 140 440 0.1419 740 0.1073 1040 0.0827 1340 0.0671 1640 150 450 0.1422 750 0.1072 1050 0.0827 1350 0.0670 1650 160 0.0063 460 0.1818 760 0.1023 1060 0.0774 1360 0.0615 1660 170 0.0063 470 0.1818 770 0.1023 1070 0.0774 1370 0.0615 1670 180 0.0063 480 0.1847 780 0.1023 1080 0.0774 1380 0.0615 1680 190 0.0162 490 0.5422 790 0.0973 1090 0.0775 1390 0.0616 1690 200 0.0162 500 0.5422 800 0.0973 1100 0.0775 1400 0.0616 1700 210 0.0162 510 0.5401 810 0.0973 1110 0.0774 1410 0.0616 1710 220 0.0245 520 0.2752 820 0.0976 1120 0.0721 1420 0.0617 1720 230 0.0245 530 0.2752 830 0.0976 1130 0.0721 1430 0.0617 1730 240 0.0245 540 0.2746 840 0.0976 1140 0.0721 1440 0.0612 1740 250 0.0337 550 0.2047 850 0.0925 1150 0.0722 1450 1750 260 0.0337 560 0.2047 860 0.0925 1160 0.0722 1460 1760 270 0.0338 570 0.2043 870 0.0925 1170 0.0721 1470 1770 280 0.0456 580 0.1556 880 0.0927 1180 0.0667 1480 1780 290 0.0456 590 0.1556 890 0.0927 1190 0.0667 1490 1790 300 0.0457 600 0.1555 900 0.0927 1200 0.0667 1500 1800 7/2/01 3 :45 :21 pm Shareware Release page 23 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMEX4-2 NAME: REID MIDDLETON EX4-2YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0 . 20 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres 0 . 20 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN 0 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 0 . 00 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 130 . 00 ns : 0 .4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 1690 TcReach - Shallow L: 170 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0590 1 PEAK RATE: 0 . 09 cfs VOL: 0 . 03 Ac-ft TIME : 500 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 0.0133 610 0.0209 910 0.0125 1210 0.0094 1510 20 320 0.0133 620 0.0209' 920 0.0125 1220 0.0094 1520 30 330 0.0133 630 0.0208 930 0.0125 1230 0.0094 1530 40 340 0.0152 640 0.0186 940 0.0125 1240 0.0094 1540 50 350 0.0152 650 0.0186 950 0.0125 1250 0.0094 1550 60 360 0.0152 660 0.0186 960 0.0125 1260 0.0094 1560 70 370 0.0170 670 0.0171 970 0.0117 1270 0.0094 1570 80 380 0.0170 680 0.0171 980 0.0117 1280 0.0094 1580 90 390 0.0171 690 0.0170 990 0.0117 1290 0.0094 1590 100 0.0016 400 0.0203 700 0.0163 1000 0.0117 1300 0.0094 1600 110 0.0016 410 0.0203 710 0.0163 1010 0.0117 1310 0.0094 1610 120 0.0016 420 0.0204 720 0.0163 1020 0.0117 1320 0.0094 1620 130 0.0040 430 0.0251 730 0.0155 1030 0.0117 1330 0.0094 1630 140 0.0040 440 0.0251 740 0.0155 1040 0.0117 1340 0.0094 1640 150 0.0040 450 0.0252 750 0.0155 1050 0.0117 1350 0.0094 1650 160 0.0060 460 0.0307 760 0.0148 1060 0.0110 1360 0.0086 1660 170 0.0060 470 0.0307 770 0.0148 1070 0.0110 1370 0.0086 1670 180 0.0060 480 0.0312 780 0.0148 1080 0.0110 1380 0.0086 1680 190 0.0073 490 0.0863 790 0.0140 1090 0.0110 1390 0.0086 1690 200 0.0073 500 0.0863 800 0.0140 1100 0.0110 1400 0.0086 1700 210 0.0073 510 0.0860 810 0.0140 1110 0.0110 1410 0.0086 1710 220 0.0082 520 0.0420 820 0.0140 1120 0.0102 1420 0.0086 1720 230 0.0082 530 0.0420 830 0.0140 1130 0.0102 1430 0.0086 1730 240 0.0082 540 0.0419 840 0.0140 1140 0.0102 1440 0.0086 1740 250 0.0095 550 0.0307 850 0.0133 1150 0.0102 1450 1750 260 0.0095 560 0.0307 860 0.0133 1160 0.0102 1460 1760 270 0.0096 570 0.0307 870 0.0133 1170 0.0102 1470 1770 280 0.0114 580 0.0231 880 0.0133 1180 0.0094 1480 1780 290 0.0114 590 0.0231 890 0.0133 1190 0.0094 1490 1790 300 0.0114 600 0.0231 900 0.0133 1200 0.0094 1500 1800 7/2/01 3 :45 :21 pm Shareware Release page 22 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMEX4-10 NAME: REID MIDDLETON EX4-10YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0 .20 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres 0 . 20 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 0 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 0 . 00 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 130 . 00 ns : 0 .4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 1690 TcReach - Shallow L: 170 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0590 PEAK RATE: 0 . 13 cfs VOL: 0 . 04 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 0.0212 610 0.0306 910 0.0182 1210 0.0137 1510 20 320 0.0212 620 0.0306 920 0.0182 1220 0.0137 1520 30 330 0.0212 630 0.0306 930 0.0182 1230 0.0137 1530 40 340 0.0238 640 0.0272 940 0.0183 1240 0.0137 1540 50 350 0.0238 650 0.0272 950 0.0183 1250 0.0137 1550 60 360 0.0238 660 0.0272 960 0.0182 1260 0.0137 1560 70 0.0009 370 0.0264 670 0.0250 970 0.0171 1270 0.0137 1570 80 0.0009 380 0.0264 680 0.0250 980 0.0171 1280 0.0137 1580 90 0.0010 390 0.0264 690 0.0250 990 0.0171 1290 0.0137 1590 100 0.0051 400 0.0311 700 0.0239 1000 0.0171 1300 0.0137 1600 110 0.0051 410 0.0311 710 0.0239 1010 0.0171 1310 0.0137 1610 120 0.0051 420 0.0312 720 0.0239 1020 0.0171 1320 0.0137 1620 130 0.0086 430 0.0381 730 0.0228 1030 0.0171 1330 0.0137 1630 140 0.0086 440 0.0381 740 0.0228 1040 0.0171 1340 0.0137 1640 150 0.0086 450 0.0382 750 0.0227 1050 0.0171 1350 0.0137 1650 160 0.0115 460 0.0462 760 0.0216 1060 0.0160 1360 0.0126 1660 170 0.0115 470 0.0462 770 0.0216 1070 0.0160 1370 0.0126 1670 180 0.0115 480 0.0469 780 0.0216 1080 0.0160 1380 0.0126 1680 190 0.0131 490 0.1284 790 0.0205 1090 0.0160 1390 0.0126 1690 200 0.0131 500 0.1284 800 0.0205 1100 0.0160 1400 0.0126 1700 210 0.0131 510 0.1279 810 0.0205 1110 0.0160 1410 0.0126 1710 220 0.0142 520 0.0620 820 0.0205 1120 0.0148 1420 0.0126 1720 230 0.0142 530 0.0620 830 0.0205 1130 0.0148 1430 0.0126 1730 240 0.0142 540 0.0618 840 0.0205 1140 0.0148 1440 0.0125 1740 250 0.0159 550 0.0452 850 0.0194 1150 0.0148 1450 1750 260 0.0159 560 0.0452 860 0.0194 1160 0.0148 1460 1760 270 0.0159 570 0.0451 870 0.0194 1170 0.0148 1470 1770 280 0.0185 580 0.0340 880 0.0194 1180 0.0137 1480 1780 290 0.0185 590 0.0340 890 0.0194 1190 0.0137 1490 1790 300 0.0186 600 0.0339 900 0.0194 1200 0.0137 1500 1800 7/2/01 3 :45 :21 pm Shareware Release page 24 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMEX4100 NAME: REID MIDDLETON EX4-100YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0 . 20 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 95 inches AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres 0 . 20 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN 0 . 00 98 . 00 TC 0 . 00 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 130 . 00 ns : 0 . 4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 1690 TcReach - Shallow L: 170 . 00 ks: 27 . 00 -s : 0 . 0590 PEAK RATE: 0 . 18 cfs VOL: 0 . 06 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 0.0303 610 0.0419 910 0.0249 1210 0.0187 ,1510 20 320 0.0303 620 0.0419 920 0.0249 1220 0.0187 1520 30 330 0.0304 630 0.0419 930 0.0249 1230 0.0187 1530 40 340 0.0338 640 0.0373 940 0.0249 1240 0.0187 1540 50 350 0.0338 650 0.0373 950 0.0249 1250 0.0187 1550 60 360 0.0338 660 0.0373 960 0.0249 1260 0.0187 1560 70 0.0034 370 0.0372 670 0.0342 970 0.0234 1270 0.0187 1570 80 0.0034 380 0.0372 680 0.0342 980 0.0234 1280 0.0187 1580 90 0.0034 390 0.0372 690 0.0342 990 0.0234 1290 0.0187 1590 100 0.0100 400 0.0436 700 0.0327 1000 0.0234 1300 0.0187 1600 110 0.0100 410 0.0436 710 0.0327 1010 0.0234 1310 0.0187 1610 120 0.0100 420 0.0437 720 0.0327 1020 0.0234 1320 0.0187 1620 130 0.0147 430 0.0530 730 0.0311 1030 0.0234 1330 0.0187 1630 140 0.0147 440 0.0530 740 0.0311 1040 0.0234 1340 0.0187 1640 150 0.0147 450 0.0531 750 0.0311 1050 0.0234 1350 0.0187 1650 160 0.0184 460 0.0641 760 0.0296 1060 0.0218 1360 0.0172 1660 170 0.0184 470 0.0641 770 0.0296 1070 0.0218 1370 0.0172 1670 180 0.0184 480 0.0650 780 0.0296 1080 0.0218 1380 0.0172 1680 190 0.0201 490 0.1770 790 0.0280 1090 0.0218 1390 0.0172 1690 200 0.0201 500 0.1770 800 0.0280 1100 0.0218 1400 0.0172 1700 210 0.0201 510 0.1763 810 0.0280 1110 0.0218 1410 0.0172 1710 220 0.0212 520 0.0851 820 0.0280 1120 0.0203 1420 0.0172 1720 230 0.0212 530 0.0851 830 0.0280 1130 0.0203 1430 0.0172 1730 240 0.0212 540 0.0849 840 0.0280 1140 0.0203 1440 0.0170 1740 250 0.0234 550 0.0620 850 0.0265 1150 0.0203 1450, 1750 260 0.0234 560 0.0620 860 0.0265 1160 0.0203 1460 1760 270 0.0234 570 0.0619 870 0.0265 1170 0.0203 1470 1770 280 0.0269 580 0.0466 880 0.0265 1180 0.0187 1480 1780 290 0.0269 590 0.0466 890 0.0265 1190 0.0187 1490 1790 300 0.0269 600 0.0465 900 0.0265 1200 0.0187 1500 1800 7/2/01 3 :45 :22 pm Shareware Release page 26 MONSTER ROAD SITE - - GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMEXS-2 NAME: REID MIDDLETON EX5-2YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0 . 36 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres 0 . 36 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 0 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 0 . 00 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 130 . 00 ns : 0 .4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 1690 TcReach - Shallow L: 170 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0590 PEAK RATE : 0 . 16 cfs VOL: 0 . 05 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 0.0239 610 0.0375 910 0.0225 1210 0.0169 1510 20 320 0.0239 620 0.0375 920 0.0225 1220 0.0169 1520 30 330 0.0239 630 0.0375 930 0.0225 1230 0.0169 1530 40 340 0.0273 640 0.0334 940 0.0225 1240 0.0169 1540 50 350 0.0273 650 0.0334 950 0.0225 1250 0.0169 1550 60 360 0.0273 660 0.0334 960 0.0225 1260 0.0169 1560 70 370 0.0307 670 0.0307 970 0.0211 1270 0.0169 1570 80 380 0.0307 680 0.0307 980 0.0211 1280 0.0169 1580 90 390 0.0307 690 0.0307 990 0.0211 1290 0.0169 1590 100 0.0029 400 0.0366 700 0.0293 1000 0.0211 1300 0.0169 1600 110 0.0029 410 0.0366 710 0.0293 1010 0.0211 1310 0.0169 1610 120 0.0029 420 0.0366 720 0.0293 1020 0.0211 1320 0.0169 1620 130 0.0071 430 0.0452 730 0.0280 1030 0.0211 1330 0.0169 1630 140 0.0071 440 0.0452 740 0.0280 1040 0.0211 1340 0.0169 1640 150 0.0071 450 0.0453 750 0.0280 1050 0.0211 1350 0.0169 1650 160 0.0108 460 0.0553 760 0.0266 1060 0.0197 1360 0.0155 1660 170 0.0108 470 0.0553 770 0.0266 1070 0.0197 1370 0.0155 1670 180 0.0108 480 0.0561 780 0.0266 1080 0.0197 1380 0.0155 1680 190 0.0131 490 0.1554 790 0.0252 1090 0.0197 1390 0.0155 1690 200 0.0131 500 0.1554 800 0.0252 1100 0.0197 1400 0.0155 1700 210 0.0131 510 0.1548 810 0.0252 1110 0.0197 1410 0.0155 1710 220 0.0148 520 0.0756 820 0.0252 1120 0.0183 1420 0.0155 1720 230 0.0148 530 0.0756 830 0.0252 1130 0.0183 1430 0.0155 1730 240 0.0148 540 0.0754 840 0.0252 1140 0.0183 1440 0.0154 1740 250 0.0172 550 0.0553 850 0.0239 1150 0.0183 1450 1750 •. 260 0.0172 560 0.0553 860 0.0239 1160 0.0183 1460 1760 270 0.0172 570 0.0552 870 0.0239 1170 0.0183 1470 1770 280 0.0205 580 0.0416 880 0.0239 1180 0.0169 1480 1780 290 0.0205 590 0.0416 890 0.0239 1190 0.0169 1490 1790 300 0.0205 600 0.0416 900 0.0239 1200 0.0169 1500 1800 7/2/01 3 :45 :21 pm Shareware Release page 25 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMEX5-10 NAME: REID MIDDLETON EX5-10YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ▪ 0 . 36 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE ▪ TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION ▪ 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres 0 . 36 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN 0 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 0 . 00 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 130 . 00 ns : 0 .4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 1690 TcReach - Shallow L: 170 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0590 PEAK RATE: 0 .23 cfs VOL: 0 . 08 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 0.0381 610 0.0551 910 0.0328 1210 0.0247 1510 20 320 0.0381 620 0.0551 920 0.0328 1220 0.0247 1520 30 330 0.0382 630 0.0551 930 0.0328 1230 0.0247 1530 40 340 0.0428 640 0.0490 940 0.0329 1240 0.0247 1540 50 350 0.0428 650 0.0490 950 0.0329 1250 0.0247 1550 60 360 0.0429 660 0.0490 960 0.0328 1260 0.0247 1560 70 0.0017 370 0.0475 670 0.0450 970 0.0308 1270 0.0247 1570 80 0.0017 380 0.0475 680 0.0450 980 0.0308 1280 0.0247 1580 90 0.0017 390 0.0476 690 0.0450 990 0.0308 1290 0.0247 1590 100 0.0091 400 0.0560 700 0.0430 1000 0.0308 1300 0.0247 1600 110 0.0091 410 0.0560 710 0.0430 1010 0.0308 1310 0.0247 1610 120 0.0092 420 0.0561 720 0.0430 1020 0.0308 1320 0.0247 1620 130 0.0155 430 0.0686 730 0.0410 1030 0.0308 1330 0.0247 1630 140 0.0155 440 0.0686 740 0.0410 1040 0.0308 1340 0.0247 1640 150 0.0155 450 0.0687 750 0.0409 1050 0.0308 1350 0.0247 1650 160 0.0207 460 0.0832 760 0.0389 1060 0.0288 1360 0.0226 1660 170 0.0207 470 0.0832 770 0.0389 1070 0.0288 1370 0.0226 1670 180 0.0207 480 0.0844 780 0.0389 1080 0.0288 1380 0.0226 1680 190 0.0235 490 0.2311 790 0.0369 1090 0.0288 1390 0.0226 1690 200 0.0235 500 0.2311 800 0.0369 1100 0.0288 1400 0.0226 1700 210 0.0236 510 0.2302 810 0.0369 1110 0.0288 1410 0.0226 1710 220 0.0255 520 0.1116 820 0.0369 1120 0.0267 1420 0.0226 1720 230 0.0255 530 0.1116 830 0.0369 1130 0.0267 1430 0.0226 1730 240 0.0255 540 0.1113 840 0.0369 1140 0.0267 1440 0.0225 1740 250 0.0286 550 0.0814 850 0.0349 1150 0.0267 1450 1750 260 0.0286 560 0.0814 860 0.0349 1160 0.0267 1460 1760 270 0.0287 570 0.0812 870 0.0349 1170 0.0267 1470 1770 280 0.0334 580 0.0612 880 0.0349 1180 0.0247 1480 1780 290 0.0334 590 0.0612 890 0.0349 1190 0.0247 1490 1790 300 0.0334 600 0.0611 900 0.0349 1200 0.0247 1500 1800 7/2/01 3 :45 :22 pm Shareware Release page 27 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION 1 BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMEX5100 NAME: REID MIDDLETON EX5-100YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ▪ 0 . 36 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE ▪ TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION ▪ 3 . 95 inches AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres 0 . 36 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN 0 . 00 98 . 00 TC 0 . 00 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 130 . 00 ns : 0 .4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 1690 TcReach - Shallow L: 170 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0590 PEAK RATE: 0 .32 cfs VOL: 0 . 11 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 0.0546 610 0.0755 910 0.0449 1210 0.0337 1510 20 320 0.0546 620 0.0755 920 0.0449 1220 0.0337 1520 30 330 0.0547 630 0.0754 930 0.0449 1230 0.0337 1530 40 340 0.0608 640 0.0671 940 0.0449 1240 0.0337 1540 50 350 0.0608 650 0.0671 950 0.0449 1250 0.0337 1550 60 360 0.0609 660 0.0671 960 0.0449 1260 0.0337 1560 70 0.0061 370 0.0669 670 0.0616 970 0.0421 1270 0.0337 1570 80 0.0061 380 0.0669 680 0.0616 980 0.0421 1280 0.0337 1580 90 0.0061 390 0.0670 690 0.0616 990 0.0421 1290 0.0337 1590 100 0.0179 400 0.0784 700 0.0588 1000 0.0421 1300 0.0337 1600 110 0.0179 410 0.0784 710 0.0588 1010 0.0421 1310 0.0337 1610 120 0.0180 420 0.0786 720 0.0588 1020 0.0421 1320 0.0337 1620 130 0.0265 430 0.0955 730 0.0560 1030 0.0421 1330 0.0337 1630 140 0.0265 440 0.0955 740 0.0560 1040 0.0421 1340 0.0337 1640 150 0.0265 450 0.0956 750 0.0560 1050 0.0421 1350 0.0337 1650 ' 160 0.0330 460 0.1154 760 0.0532 1060 0.0393 1360 0.0309 1660 170 0.0330 470 0.1154 770 0.0532 1070 0.0393 1370 0.0309 1670 180 0.0331 480 0.1170 780 0.0532 1080 0.0393 1380 0.0309 1680 190 0.0361 490 0.3186 790 0.0504 1090 0.0393 1390 0.0309 1690 200 0.0361 500 0.3186 800 0.0504 1100 0.0393 1400 0.0309 1700 210 0.0362 510 0.3173 810 0.0504 1110 0.0393 1410 0.0309 1710 220 0.0382 520 0.1532 820 0.0505 1120 0.0365 1420 0.0309 1720 230 0.0382 530 0.1532 830 0.0505 1130 0.0365 1430 0.0309 1730 240 0.0382 540 0.1529 840 0.0504 1140 0.0365 1440 0.0307 1740 250 0.0421 550 0.1116 850 0.0477 1150 0.0365 1450 1750 260 0.0421 560 0.1116 860 0.0477 1160 0.0365 1460 1760 270 0.0421 570 0.1114 870 0.0477 1170 0.0365 1470 1770 280 0.0484 580 0.0838 880 0.0477 1180 0.0337 1480 1780 290 0.0484 590 0.0838 890 0.0477 1190 0.0337 1490 1790 300 0.0484 600 0.0838 900 0.0477 1200 0.0337 1500 1800 7/2/01 3 :45 :22 pm Shareware Release page 29 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMEX6-2 NAME : REID MIDDLETON EX6-2YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ▪ 1 . 76 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE ▪ TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 1 . 76 Acres 0 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN 81 . 00 0 . 00 TC 5 . 00 min 0 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 130 . 00 ns : 0 .4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 1690 TcReach - Shallow L: 170 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0590 PEAK RATE: 0 . 15 cfs VOL: 0 . 09 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 610 0.0734 910 0.0584 1210 0.0497 1510 20 320 620 0.0734 920 0.0584 1220 0.0497 1520 30 330 630 0.0734 930 0.0584 1230 0.0497 1530 40 340 640 0.0686 940 0.0594 1240 0.0501 1540 50 350 650 0.0686 950 0.0594 1250 0.0501 1550 60 360 660 0.0686 960 0.0594 1260 0.0501 1560 70 370 670 0.0656 970 0.0566 1270 0.0506 1570 80 380 680 0.0656 980 0.0566 1280 0.0506 1580 90 390 690 0.0656 990 0.0566 1290 0.0506 1590 100 400 700 0.0649 1000 0.0574 1300 0.0510 1600 110 410 710 0.0649 1010 0.0574 1310 0.0510 1610 120 420 720 0.0649 1020 0.0574 1320 0.0510 1620 130 430 0.0065 730 0.0638 1030 0.0582 1330 0.0514 1630 140 440 0.0065 740 0.0638 1040 0.0582 1340 0.0514 1640 150 450 0.0066 750 0.0638 1050 0.0582 1350 0.0514 1650 160 460 0.0253 760 0.0623 1060 0.0550 1360 0.0475 1660 170 470 0.0253 770 0.0623 1070 0.0550 1370 0.0475 1670 180 480 0.0263 780 0.0623 1080 0.0550 1380 0.0475 1680 190 490 0.1537 790 0.0605 1090 0.0557 1390 0.0478 1690 200 500 0.1537 800 0.0605 1100 0.0557 1400 0.0478 1700 210 510 0.1533 810 0.0606 1110 0.0556 1410 0.0478 1710 220 520 0.1107 820 0.0620 1120 0.0523 1420 0.0481 1720 230 530 0.1107 830 0.0620 1130 0.0523 1430 0.0481 1730 240 540 0.1105 840 0.0619 1140 0.0523 1440 0.0477 1740 250 550 0.0934 850 0.0598 1150 0.0528 1450 1750 260 560 0.0934 860 0.0598 1160 0.0528 1460 1760 270 570 0.0933 870 0.0598 1170 0.0528 1470 1770 280 580 0.0766 880 0.0609 1180 0.0492 1480 1780 290 590 0.0766 890 0.0609 1190 0.0492 1490 1790 300 600 0.0766 900 0.0609 1200 0.0492 1500 1800 7/2/01 3 :45 :22 pm Shareware Release page 28. MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION I BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMEX6-10 NAME: REID MIDDLETON EX6-10YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 1 . 76 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 1 . 76 Acres 0 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 81 . 00 0 . 00 TC 5 . 00 min 0 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 130 . 00 ns : 0 .4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 1690 TcReach - Shallow L: 170 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0590 PEAK RATE: 0 .42 cfs VOL: 0 . 17 Ac-ft TIME : 490 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 610 0.1511 910 0.1084 1210 0.0882 1510 20 320 620 0.1511 920 0.1084 1220 0.0882 1520 30 330 630 0.1510 930 0.1084 1230 0.0882 1530 40 340 0.0036 640 0.1387 940 0.1096 1240 0.0887 1540 i 50 350 0.0036 650 0.1387 950 0.1096 1250 0.0887 1550 60 360 0.0037 660 0.1387 960 0.1095 1260 0.0888 1560 70 370 0.0176 670 0.1306 970 0.1038 1270 0.0892 1570 80 380 0.0176 680 0.1306 980 0.1038 1280 0.0892 1580 90 390 0.0177 690 0.1306 990 0.1038 1290 0.0892 1590 100 400 0.0371 700 0.1276 1000 0.1048 1300 0.0897 1600 110 410 0.0371 710 0.1276 1010 0.1048 1310 0.0897 1610 120 420 0.0373 720 0.1276 1020 0.1048 1320 0.0897 1620 130 430 0.0664 730 0.1240 1030 0.1057 1330 0.0902 1630 140 440 0.0664 740 0.1240 1040 0.1057 1340 0.0902 1640 150 450 0.0667 750 0.1240 1050 0.1057 1350 0.0901 1650 160 460 0.1074 760 0.1200 1060 0.0995 1360 0.0831 1660 170 470 0.1074 770 0.1200 1070 0.0995 1370 0.0831 1670 180 480 0.1099 780 0.1200 1080 0.0995 1380 0.0831 1680 190 490 0.4213 790 0.1156 1090 0.1003 1390 0.0835 1690 200 500 0.4213 800 0.1156 1100 0.1003 1400 0.0835 1700 210 510 0.4200 810 0.1156 1110 0.1002 1410 0.0835 1710 220 520 0.2550 820 0.1173 1120 0.0938 1420 0.0838 1720 230 530 0.2550 830 0.1173 1130 0.0938 1430 0.0838 1730 240 540 0.2546 840 0.1173 1140 0.0938 1440 0.0832 1740 •250 550 0.2033 850 0.1124 1150 0.0944 1450 1750 260 560 0.2033 860 0.1124 1160 0.0944 1460 1760 270 570 0.2029 870 0.1124 1170 0.0944 1470 1770 280 580 0.1613 880 0.1138 1180 0.0877 1480 1780 290 590 0.1613 890 0.1138 1190 0.0877 1490 1790 300 600 0.1612 900 0.1138 1200 0.0877 1500 1800 7/2/01 3 :45 :23 pm Shareware Release page 30 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMEX6100 NAME : REID MIDDLETON EX6-100YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ▪ 1 . 76 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE ▪ TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION ▪ 3 . 95 inches AREA. . : 1 . 76 Acres 0 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN 81 . 00 0 . 00 TC 5 . 00 min 0 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 130 . 00 ns : 0 . 4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 1690 TcReach - Shallow L: 170 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0590 PEAK RATE: 0 . 79 cfs VOL: 0 . 29 Ac-ft TIME : 500 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 0.0243 610 0.2502 910 0.1695 1210 0.1345 1510 20 320 0.0243 620 0.2502 920 0.1695 1220 0.1345 1520 30 330 0.0245 630 0.2500 930 0.1695 1230 0.1345 1530 40 340 0.0461 640 0.2275 940 0.1708 1240 0.1350 1540 50 350 0.0461 650 0.2275 950 0.1708 1250 0.1350 1550 60 360 0.0463 660 0.2274 960 0.1707 1260 0.1350 1560 70 370 0.0709 670 0.2125 970 0.1612 1270 0.1356 1570 80 380 0.0709 680 0.2125 980 0.1612 1280 0.1356 1580 90 390 0.0712 690 0.2125 990 0.1612 1290 0.1356 1590 100 400 0.1065 700 0.2062 1000 0.1623 1300 0.1361 1600 110 410 0.1065 710 0.2062 1010 0.1623 1310 0.1361 1610 120 420 0.1069 720 0.2061 1020 0.1623 1320 0.1361 1620 130 430 0.1589 730 0.1992 1030 0.1633 1330 0.1365 1630 140 440 0.1589 740 0.1992 1040 0.1633 1340 0.1365 1640 150 450 0.1595 750 0.1992 1050 0.1632 1350 0.1365 1650 160 460 0.2287 760 0.1917 1060 0.1533 1360 0.1256 1660 170 470 0.2287 770 0.1917 1070 0.1533 1370 0.1256 1670 180 480 0.2332 780 0.1916 1080 0.1533 1380 0.1256 1680 190 490 0.7933 790 0.1837 1090 0.1541 1390 0.1260 1690 200 500 0.7933 800 0.1637 1100 0.1541 1400 0.1260 1700 210 510 0.7905 810 0.1837 1110 0.1540 1410 0.1260 1710 220 520 0.4467 820 0.1856 1120 0.1438 1420 0.1264 1720 230 530 0.4467 830 0.1856 1130 0.1438 1430 0.1264 1730 240 540 0.4459 840 0.1856 1140 0.1438 1440 0.1254 1740 250 550 0.3464 850 0.1770 1150 0.1445 1450 1750 260 560 0.3464 860 0.1770 1160 0.1445 1460 1760 270 570 0.3458 870 0.1770 1170 0.1444 1470 1770 280 0.0059 580 0.2703 880 0.1786 1180 0.1340 1480 1780 290 0.0059 590 0.2703 890 0.1786 1190 0.1340 1490 1790 300 0.0061 600 0.2701 900 0.1785 1200 0.1340 1500 1800 7/2/01 3 :45 : 16 pm Shareware Release page 5 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMDV1-2 NAME: REID MIDDLETON DV1-2YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 7 . 29 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE ▪ TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION ▪ 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 7 . 09 Acres 0 .20 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 98 . 00 TC 12 . 58 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 110 . 00 ns : 0 .4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 3300 TcReach - Shallow L: 200 . 00 ks : 11 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 PEAK RATE : 1 . 24 cfs VOL: 0 . 51 Ac-ft TIME : 510 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN it RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 0.0133 610 0.4473 910 0.3172 1210 0.2534 1510 20 320 0.0133 620 0.4393 920 0.3129 1220 0.2538 1520 30 330 0.0134 630 0.4382 930 0.3126 1230 0.2539 1530 40 340 0.0213 640 0.4128 940 0.3149 1240 0.2549 1540 50 350 0.0238 650 0.4031 950 0.3158 1250 0.2553 1550 60 360 0.0244 660 0.4020 960 0.3158 1260 0.2553 1560 70 370 0.0522 670 0.3853 970 0.3040 1270 0.2563 1570 80 380 0.0630 680 0.3789 980 0.2995 1280 0.2566 1580 90 390 0.0644 690 0.3783 990 0.2991 1290 0.2567 1590 100 0.0016 400 0.1045 700 0.3719 1000 0.3010 1300 0.2576 1600 110 0.0016 410 0.1198 710 0.3695 1010 0.3018 1310 0.2580 1610 120 0.0016 420 0.1220 720 0.3692 1020 0.3019 1320 0.2580 1620 130 0.0040 430 0.1817 730 0.3618 1030 0.3037 1330 0.2589 1630 140 0.0040 440 0.2048 740 0.3590 1040 0.3044 1340 0.2593 1640 150 0.0040 450 0.2081 750 0.3587 1050 0.3043 1350 0.2592 1650 160 0.0060 460 0.2905 760 0.3503 1060 0.2919 1360 0.2449 1660 170 0.0060 470 0.3230 770 0.3472 1070 0.2870 1370 0.2394 1670 180 0.0060 480 0.3364 780 0.3468 1080 0.2866 1380 0.2389 1680 190 0.0073 490 0.9781 790 0.3377 1090 0.2880 1390 0.2396 1690 200 0.0073 500 1.2262 800 0.3342 1100 0.2887 1400 0.2399 1700 I 210 0.0073 510 1.2419 810 0.3340 1110 0.2885 1410 0.2400 1710 220 0.0082 520 0.8879 820 0.3373 1120 0.2755 1420 0.2407 1720 j 230 0.0082 530 0.7572 830 0.3387 1130 0.2704 1430 0.2410 1730 I 240 0.0082 540 0.7445 840 0.3386 1140 0.2700 1440 0.2400 1740 250 0.0095 550 0.6363 850 0.3286 1150 0.2712 1450 0.0827 1750 260 0.0095 560 0.5958 860 0.3246 1160 0.2717 1460 0.0071 1760 ' 270 0.0096 570 0.5913 870 0.3243 1170 0.2716 1470 1770 280 0.0114 580 0.5044 880 0.3271 1180 0.2582 1480 1780 290 0.0114 590 0.4717 890 0.3282 1190 0.2529 1490 1790 300 0.0114 600 0.4686 900 0.3282 1200 0.2524 1500 1800 1 7/2/01 3 :45 : 15 pm Shareware Release page 4 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMDV1-10 NAME : REID MIDDLETON DV1-10YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ▪ 7 .29 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE ▪ TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION ▪ 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 7 . 09 Acres 0 .20 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 12 . 58 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 110 . 00 ns : 0 .4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 3300 TcReach - Shallow L: 200 . 00 ks : 11 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 PEAK RATE : 2 . 57 cfs VOL: 0 . 94 Ac-ft TIME: 510 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 0.0959 610 0.8115 910 0.5382 1210 0.4176 1510 20 320 0.1125 620 0.7937 920 0.5303 1220 0.4180 1520 30 330 0.1146 630 0.7914 930 0.5297 1230 0.4181 1530 40 340 0.1630 640 0.7406 940 0.5321 1240 0.4191 1540 50 350 0.1822 650 0.7205 950 0.5332 1250 0.4195 1550 60 360 0.1846 660 0.7182 960 0.5330 1260 0.4196 1560 70 0.0009 370 0.2390 670 0.6846 970 0.5120 1270 0.4205 1570 80 0.0009 380 0.2606 680 0.6713 980 0.5038 1280 0.4209 1580 90 0.0010 390 0.2634 690 0.6699 990 0.5032 1290 0.4210 1590 100 0.0051 400 0.3430 700 0.6553 1000 0.5052 1300 0.4219 1600 110 0.0051 410 0.3741 710 0.6496 1010 0.5060 1310 0.4223 1610, 120 0.0051 420 0.3784 720 0.6489 1020 0.5061 1320 0.4224 1620 130 0.0086 430 0.4952 730 0.6330 1030 0.5081 1330 0.4233 1630 140 0.0086 440 0.5412 740 0.6268 1040 0.5089 1340 0.4237 1640 150 0.0086 450 0.5477 750 0.6261 1050 0.5086 1350 0.4235 1650 160 0.0115 460 0.7003 760 0.6091 1060 0.4869 1360 0.3998 1660 170 0.0115 470 0.7613 770 0.6025 1070 0.4783 1370 0.3904 1670 180 0.0115 480 0.7877 780 0.6017 1080 0.4775 1380 0.3896 1680 190 0.0131 490 2.0467 790 0.5837 1090 0.4791 1390 0.3904 1690 200 0.0131 500 2.5448 800 0.5767 1100 0.4798 1400 0.3907 1700 210 0.0131 510 2.5746 810 0.5762 1110 0.4795 1410 0.3907 1710 220 0.0142 520 1.7705 820 0.5799 1120 0.4572 1420 0.3914 1720 230 0.0142 530 1.4594 830 0.5815 1130 0.4483 1430 0.3918 1730 240 0.0142 540 1.4294 840 0.5813 1140 0.4476 1440 0.3903 1740 250 0.0166 550 1.2004 850 0.5623 1150 0.4489 1450 0.1350 •.1750 260 0.0169 560 1.1117 860 0.5548 1160 0.4494 1460 0.0116 1760 270 0.0173 570 1.1021 870 0.5542 1170 0.4492 1470 1770 280 0.0430 580 0.9301 880 0.5572 1180 0.4264 1480 1780 290 0.0527 590 0.8637 890 0.5585 1190 0.4173 1490 1790 300 0.0543 600 0.8575 900 0.5583 1200 0.4166 1500 1800 1 7/2/01 3 :45 : 16 pm Shareware Release page 6 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMDV1100 NAME : REID MIDDLETON DV1-100YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 7 . 29 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 95 inches AREA. . : 7 . 09 Acres 0 .20 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN 86 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 12 .58 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 110 . 00 ns : 0 .4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 .3300 TcReach - Shallow L: 200 . 00 ks : 11 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 PEAK RATE: 4 .29 cfs VOL: 1 .49 Ac-ft TIME : 510 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 0.2880 610 1.2539 910 0.7992 1210 0.6094 1510 20 320 0.3162 620 1.2233 920 0.7868 1220 0.6098 1520 30 330 0.3199 630 1.2194 930 0.7858 1230 0.6099 1530 40 340 0.3983 640 1.1365 940 0.7883 1240 0.6108 1540 50 350 0.4299 650 1.1035 950 0.7893 1250 0.6112 1550 60 360 0.4337 660 1.0997 960 0.7890 1260 0.6113 1560 70 0.0034 370 0.5193 670 1.0447 970 0.7569 1270 0.6122 1570 1 80 0.0034 380 0.5535 680 1.0227 980 0.7443 1280 0.6126 1580 90 0.0034 390 0.5580 690 1.0204 990 0.7433 1290 0.6127 1590 100 0.0100 400 0.6872 700 0.9951 1000 0.7453 1300 0.6136 1600 110 0.0100 410 0.7381 710 0.9851 1010 0.7461 1310 0.6140 1610 ' 120 0.0100 420 0.7452 720 0.9839 1020 0.7462 1320 0.6140 1620 130 0.0147 430 0.9329 730 0.9572 1030 0.7481 1330 0.6149 1630 ' 140 0.0147 440 1.0077 740 0.9467 1040 0.7489 1340 0.6153 1640 150 0.0147 450 1.0180 750 0.9454 1050 0.7484 1350 0.6149 1650 160 0.0184 460 1.2552 760 0.9175 1060 0.7158 1360 0.5801 1660 170 0.0184 470 1.3508 770 0.9066 1070 0.7027 1370 0.5664 1670 180 0.0184 480 1.3934 780 0.9053 1080 0.7015 1380 0.5652 1680 190 0.0201 490 3.4286 790 0.8764 1090 0.7031 1390 0.5659 1690 200 0.0201 500 4.2422 800 0.8650 1100 0.7038 1400 0.5662 1700 210 0.0205 510 4.2892 810 0.8641 1110 0.7033 1410 0.5662 1710 220 0.0458 520 2.8877 820 0.8679 1120 0.6700 1420 0.5669 1720 230 0.0558 530 2.3353 830 0.8695 1130 0.6566 1430 0.5672 1730 240 0.0575 540 2.2624 840 0.8691 1140 0.6555 1440 0.5651 1740 250 0.1067 550 1.8973 850 0.8392 1150 0.6568 1450 0.1959 1750 • 260 0.1264 560 1.7460 860 0.8272 1160 0.6573 1460 0.0168 1760 270 0.1292 570 1.7298 870 0.8262 1170 0.6569 1470 1770 280 0.1901 580 1.4507 880 0.8293 1180 0.6230 1480 1780 290 0.2144 590 1.3418 890 0.8306 1190 0.6095 1490 1790 300 0.2177 600 1.3315 900 0.8302 1200 0.6084 1500 1800 7/2/01 3 :45 : 17 pm Shareware Release page 8 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMDV2-2 NAME: REID MIDDLETON DV2-2YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 8 . 39 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 1 . 60 Acres 6 . 79 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN 90 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 9 .25 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 300 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0200 TcReach - Shallow L: 700 . 00 ks :21 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 PEAK RATE: 3 . 32 cfs VOL: 1 . 11 Ac-ft TIME : 500 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 0.4644 610 0.8286 910 0.5045 1210 0.3824 1510 20 320 0.4656 620 0.8272 920 0.5039 1220 0.3824 1520 30 330 0.4663 630 0.8265 930 0.5039 1230 0.3824 1530 40 340 0.5388 640 0.7403 940 0.5046 1240 0.3827 1540 50 350 0.5402 650 0.7388 950 0.5047 1250 0.3827 1550 60 360 0.5409 660 0.7383 960 0.5045 1260 0.3827 1560 70 0.0007 370 0.6142 670 0.6808 970 0.4745 1270 0.3830 1570 80 0.0007 380 0.6159 680 0.6798 980 0.4739 1280 0.3830 1580 90 0.0011 390 0.6170 690 0.6796 990 0.4739 1290 0.3830 1590 100 0.0549 400 0.7419 700 0.6515 1000 0.4744 1300 0.3833 1600 110 0.0549 410 0.7443 710 0.6511 1010 0.4745 1310 0.3833 1610 120 0.0556 420 0.7459 720 0.6509 1020 0.4745 1320 0.3833 1620 130 0.1342 430 0.9288 730 0.6224 1030 0.4751 1330 0.3836 1630 140 0.1342 440 0.9323 740 0.6220 1040 0.4751 1340 0.3836 1640 150 0.1348 450 0.9342 750 0.6217 1050 0.4749 1350 0.3834 1650 160 0.2031 460 1.1525 760 0.5929 1060 0.4446 1360 0.3526 1660 170 0.2031 470 1.1572 770 0.5924 1070 0.4440 1370 0.3519 1670 180 0.2034 480 1.1748 780 0.5922 1080 0.4440 1380 0.3519 1680 190 0.2472 490 3.2793 790 0.5631 1090 0.4444 1390 0.3521 1690 200 0.2472 500 3.3169 800 0.5626 1100 0.4445 1400 0.3521 1700 210 0.2475 510 3.3029 810 0.5626 1110 0.4442 1410 0.3521 1710 220 0.2797 520 1.6639 820 0.5637 1120 0.4138 1420 0.3523 1720 230 0.2797 530 1.6400 830 0.5638 1130 0.4132 1430 0.3523 1730 240 0.2800 540 1.6366 840 0.5635 1140 0.4132 1440 0.3498 1740 250 0.3241 550 1.2153 850 0.5341 1150 0.4135 1450 0.0098 1750 260 0.3242 560 1.2085 860 0.5335 1160 0.4136 1460 1760 270 0.3247 570 1.2061 870 0.5335 1170 0.4133 1470 1770 280 0.3920 580 0.9189 880 0.5344 1180 0.3828 1480 1780 290 0.3927 590 0.9138 890 0.5345 1190 0.3821 1490 1790 300 0.3934 600 0.9131 900 0.5343 1200 0.3821 1500 1800 7/2/01 3 :45 : 16 pm Shareware Release page 7 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 _ 1 1 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMDV2-10 NAME: REID MIDDLETON DV2-l0YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 8 .39 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE ▪ TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION ▪ 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 1 . 60 Acres 6 . 79 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN 90 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 9 . 25 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 300 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0200 TcReach - Shallow L: 700 . 00 ks :21 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 PEAK RATE : 5 . 07 cfs VOL: 1 . 71 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 0.7711 610 1.2421 910 0.7485 1210 0.5647 1510 20 320 0.7734 620 1.2395 920 0.7475 1220 0.5647 1520 30 330 0.7743 630 1.2384 930 0.7475 1230 0.5647 1530 40 340 0.8787 640 1.1079 940 0.7482 1240 0.5650 1540 50 350 0.8813 650 1.1051 950 0.7483 1250 0.5650 1550 60 0.0002 360 0.8823 660 1.1044 960 0.7479 1260 0.5650 1560 70 0.0313 370 0.9871 670 1.0174 970 0.7032 1270 0.5652 1570 80 0.0313 380 0.9899 680 1.0155 980 0.7021 1280 0.5653 1580 90 0.0324 390 0.9915 690 1.0152 990 0.7021 1290 0.5653 1590 100 0.1719 400 1.1769 700 0.9723 1000 0.7026 1300 0.5655 1600 110 0.1719 410 1.1812 710 0.9715 1010 0.7027 1310 0.5655 1610 120 0.1728 420 1.1835 720 0.9711 1020 0.7027 1320 0.5655 1620 130 0.2925 430 1.4562 730 0.9278 1030 0.7032 1330 0.5657 1630 140 0.2925 440 1.4624 740 0.9270 1040 0.7033 1340 0.5658 1640 150 0.2933 450 1.4652 750 0.9266 1050 0.7029 1350 0.5654 1650 I 160 0.3904 460 1.7879 760 0.8830 1060 0.6580 1360 0.5200 1660 170 0.3904 470 1.7958 770 0.8821 1070 0.6569 1370 0.5188 1670 180 0.3909 480 1.8227 780 0.8817 1080 0.6569 1380 0.5188 1680 190 0.4449 490 5.0050 790 0.8379 1090 0.6573 1390 0.5190 1690 200 0.4451 500 5.0722 800 0.8369 1100 0.6573 1400 0.5190 1700 210 0.4454 510 5.0503 810 0.8369 1110 0.6569 1410 0.5190 1710 1 220 0.4903 520 2.5274 820 0.8379 1120 0.6119 1420 0.5192 1720 230 0.4916 530 2.4805 830 0.8381 1130 0.6108 1430 0.5192 1730 240 0.4922 540 2.4752 840 0.8377 1140 0.6108 1440 0.5156 1740 I 250 0.5610 550 1.8324 850 0.7935 1150 0.6111 1450 0.0153 1750 260 0.5627 560 1.8197 860 0.7925 1160 0.6111 1460 1760 270 0.5635 570 1.8159 870 0.7925 1170 0.6107 1470 1770 280 0.6649 580 1.3812 880 0.7933 1180 0.5655 1480 1780 290 0.6669 590 1.3720 890 0.7934 1190 0.5644 1490 1790 300 0.6678 600 1.3710 900 0.7930 1200 0.5644 1500 1800 I 7/2/01 3 :45 : 17 pm Shareware Release page 9 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMDV2100 NAME: REID MIDDLETON DV2-100YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ▪ 8 .39 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE ▪ TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION ▪ 3 . 95 inches AREA. . : 1 . 60 Acres 6 . 79 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN 90 . 00 98 . 00 TC 9 . 25 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 300 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0200 TcReach - Shallow L: 700 . 00 ks :21 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 PEAK RATE: 7 . 12 cfs VOL: 2 .41 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 1.1376 610 1.7229 910 1.0320 1210 0.7764 1510 20 320 1.1413 620 1.7188 920 1.0305 1220 0.7764 1520 30 330 1.1425 630 1.7172 930 1.0305 1230 0.7764 1530 40 340 1.2828 640 1.5352 940 1.0310 1240 0.7767 1540 50 350 1.2868 650 1.5310 950 1.0311 1250 0.7767 1550 60 0.0009 360 1.2880 660 1.5299 960 1.0306 1260 0.7767 1560 70 0.1142 370 1.4284 670 1.4085 970 0.9688 1270 0.7769 1570 80 0.1142 380 1.4326 680 1.4057 980 0.9672 1280 0.7769 1580 90 0.1160 390 1.4348 690 1.4052 990 0.9672 1290 0.7769 1590 100 0.3384 400 1.6898 700 1.3451 1000 0.9677 1300 0.7771 1600 110 0.3384 410 1.6964 710 1.3437 1010 0.9677 1310 0.7771 1610 120 0.3397 420 1.6996 720 1.3432 1020 0.9678 1320 0.7771 1620 130 0.4990 430 2.0761 730 1.2827 1030 0.9682 1330 0.7773 1630 140 0.4990 440 2.0855 740 1.2813 1040 0.9682 1340 0.7774 1640 150 0.5000 450 2.0894 750 1.2808 1050 0.9677 1350 0.7769 1650 160 0.6274 460 2.5328 760 1.2200 1060 0.9057 1360 0.7144 1660 170 0.6281 470 2.5445 770 1.2186 1070 0.9041 1370 0.7128 1670 180 0.6288 480 2.5821 780 1.2181 1080 0.9041 1380 0.7128 1680 190 0.7030 490 7.0191 790 1.1571 1090 0.9045 1390 0.7129 1690 200 0.7056 500 7.1218 800 1.1556 1100 0.9045 1400 0.7130 1700 210 0.7061 510 7.0906 810 1.1556 1110 0.9040 1410 0.7130 1710 220 0.7591 520 3.5351 820 1.1565 1120 0.8418 1420 0.7131 1720 230 0.7615 530 3.4594 830 1.1566 1130 0.8403 1430 0.7131 1730 240 0.7623 540 3.4520 840 1.1561 1140 0.8403 1440 0.7081 1740 • 250 0.8517 550 2.5508 850 1.0948 1150 0.8405 1450 0.0216 1750 260 0.8544 560 2.5309 860 1.0933 1160 0.8406 1460 1760 270 0.8555 570 2.5255 870 1.0933 1170 0.8400 1470 1770 280 0.9935 580 1.9191 880 1.0940 1180 0.7778 1480 1780 290 0.9968 590 1.9050 890 1.0941 1190 0.7762 1490 1790 300 0.9981 600 1.9035 900 1.0936 1200 0.7762 1500 1800 I 7/2/01 3 :45 : 18 pm Shareware Release page 11 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMDV3-2 NAME : REID MIDDLETON DV3-2YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1 . 16 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE ▪ TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION ▪ 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 1 . 16 Acres 0 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN 90 . 00 0 . 00 TC 5 . 00 min 0 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 110 . 00 ns : 0 .4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 3300 TcReach - Shallow L: 200 . 00 ks : 11 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 PEAK RATE: 0 .28 cfs VOL: 0 . 10 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) , 10 310 0.0109 610 0.0864 910 0.0579 1210 0.0458 1510 20 320 0.0109 620 0.0864 920 0.0579 1220 0.0458 1520 30 330 0.0110 630 0.0863 930 0.0579 1230 0.0458 1530 40 340 0.0186 640 0.0784 940 0.0583 1240 0.0459 1540 50 350 0.0186 650 0.0784 950 0.0583 1250 0.0459 1550 60 360 0.0186 660 0.0784 960 0.0583 1260 0.0459 1560 70 370 0.0272 670 0.0731 970 0.0550 1270 0.0461 1570 80 380 0.0272 680 0.0731 980 0.0550 1280 0.0461 1580 90 390 0.0273 690 0.0731 990 0.0550 1290 0.0461 1590 100 400 0.0396 700 0.0709 1000 0.0554 1300 0.0462 1600 110 410 0.0396 710 0.0709 1010 0.0554 1310 0.0462 1610 120 420 0.0398 720 0.0708 1020 0.0554 1320 0.0462 1620 130 430 0.0580 730 0.0684 1030 0.0557 1330 0.0464 1630 140 440 0.0580 740 0.0684 1040 0.0557 1340 0.0464 1640 150 450 0.0582 750 0.0684 1050 0.0556 1350 0.0464 1650 160 460 0.0822 760 0.0657 1060 0.0522 1360 0.0427 1660 170 470 0.0822 770 0.0657 1070 0.0522 1370 0.0427 1670 180 480 0.0837 780 0.0657 1080 0.0522 1380 0.0427 1680 190 490 0.2798 790 0.0629 1090 0.0525 1390 0.0428 1690 200 500 0.2798 800 0.0629 1100 0.0525 1400 0.0428 1700 210 510 0.2788 810 0.0630 1110 0.0525 1410 0.0428 1710 220 520 0.1557 820 0.0636 1120 0.0490 1420 0.0429 1720 230 530 0.1557 830 0.0636 1130 0.0490 1430 0.0429 1730 ' 240 540 0.1554 840 0.0635 1140 0.0490 1440 0.0426 1740 250 0.0002 . 550 0.1202 850 0.0606 1150 0.0492 1450 1750 260 0.0002 560 0.1202 860 0.0606 1160 0.0492 1460 1760 270 0.0002 570 0.1200 870 0.0606 1170 0.0492 1470 1770 280 0.0043 580 0.0935 880 0.0611 1180 0.0456 1480 1780 290 0.0043 590 0.0935 890 0.0611 1190 0.0456 1490 1790 300 0.0044 600 0.0934 900 0.0610 1200 0.0456 1500 1800 7/2/01 3 :45 : 18 pm Shareware Release page 10 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMDV3-10 NAME: REID MIDDLETON DV3-10YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 1 . 16 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 1 . 16 Acres 0 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN 90 . 00 0 . 00 TC • 5 . 00 min 0 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 110 . 00 ns : 0 .4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 3300 TcReach - Shallow L: 200 . 00 ks : 11 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 PEAK RATE: 0 . 52 cfs VOL: 0 . 18 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 0.0393 610 0.1450 910 0.0929 1210 0.0719 1510 20 320 0.0393 620 0.1450 920 0.0929 1220 0.0719 1520 30 330 0.0394 630 0.1449 930 0.0929 1230 0.0719 1530 40 340 0.0531 640 0.1306 940 0.0933 1240 0.0721 1540 ' 50 350 0.0531 650 0.1306 950 0.0933 1250 0.0721 1550 60 360 0.0532 660 0.1306 960 0.0932 1260 0.0721 1560 70 370 0.0679 670 0.1211 970 0.0878 1270 0.0722 1570 80 380 0.0679 680 0.1211 980 0.0878 1280 0.0722 1580 90 390 0.0681 690 0.1210 990 0.0878 1290 0.0722 1590 100 400 0.0902 700 0.1167 1000 0.0881 1300 0.0724 1600 110 410 0.0902 710 0.1167 1010 0.0881 1310 0.0724 1610 120 420 0.0905 720 0.1166 1020 0.0881 1320 0.0724 1620 130 430 0.1228 730 0.1121 1030 0.0884 1330 0.0725 1630 140 440 0.1228 740 0.1121 1040 0.0884 1340 0.0725 1640 150 450 0.1231 750 0.1120 1050 0.0884 1350 0.0725 1650 160 460 0.1639 760 0.1072 1060 0.0828 1360 0.0666 1660 170 470 0.1639 770 0.1072 1070 0.0828 1370 0.0666 1670 180 480 0.1667 780 0.1072 1080 0.0828 1380 0.0666 1680 190 0.0007 490 0.5168 790 0.1023 1090 0.0831 1390 0.0667 1690 200 0.0007 500 0.5168 800 0.1023 1100 0.0831 1400 0.0667 1700 210 0.0007 510 0.5149 810 0.1023 1110 0.0830 1410 0.0667 1710 220 0.0075 520 0.2730 820 0.1029 1120 0.0773 1420 0.0668 1720 230 0.0075 530 0.2730 830 0.1029 1130 0.0773 1430 0.0668 1730 240 0.0076 540 0.2724 840 0.1029 1140 0.0773 1440 0.0663 1740 250 0.0162 550 0.2063 850 0•.0977 1150 0.0776 1450 1750 260 0.0162 560 0.2063 860 0.0977 1160 0.0776 1460 1760 270 0.0163 570 0.2060 870 0.0977 1170 0.0775 1470 1770 280 0.0270 580 0.1584 880 0.0982 1180 0.0718 1480 1780 290 0.0270 590 0.1584 890 0.0982 1190 0.0718 1490 1790 300 0.0271 600 0.1583 900 0.0982 1200 0.0718 1500 1800 7/2/01 3 :45 : 18 pm Shareware Release page 12 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: RMDV3100 NAME: REID MIDDLETON DV3-100YR SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ▪ 1 . 16 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE ▪ TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 95 inches AREA. . : 1 . 16 Acres 0 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN 90 . 00 0 . 00 TC 5 . 00 min 0 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 110 . 00 ns : 0 .4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 3300 TcReach - Shallow L: 200 . 00 ks : 11 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 PEAK RATE : 0 . 81 cfs VOL: 0 . 27 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 0.0807 610 0.2139 910 0.1334 1210 0.1021 1510 20 320 0.0807 620 0.2139 920 0.1334 1220 0.1021 1520 30 330 0.0808 630 0.2137 930 0.1334 1230 0.1021 1530 40 340 0.1015 640 0.1918 940 0.1338 1240 0.1023 1540 50 350 0.1015 650 0.1918 950 0.1338 1250 0.1023 1550 60 360 0.1016 660 0.1917 960 0.1337 1260 0.1023 1560 70 370 0.1233 670 0.1771 970 0.1257 1270 0.1024 1570 80 380 0.1233 680 0.1771 980 0.1257 1280 0.1024 1580 90 390 0.1236 690 0.1771 990 0.1257 1290 0.1024 1590 100 400 0.1572 700 0.1701 1000 0.1260 1300 0.1025 1600 110 410 0.1572 710 0.1701 1010 0.1260 1310 0.1025 1610 120 420 0.1576 720 0.1701 1020 0.1260 1320 0.1025 1620 130 430 0.2064 730 0.1629 1030 0.1263 1330 0.1027 1630 140 440 0.2064 740 0.1629 1040 0.1263 1340 0.1027 1640 150 450 0.2068 750 0.1629 1050 0.1263 1350 0.1026 1650 160 0.0036 460 0.2668 760 0.1555 1060 0.1181 1360 0.0942 1660 170 0.0036 470 0.2668 770 0.1555 1070 0.1181 1370 0.0942 1670 180 0.0037 480 0.2711 780 0.1555 1080 0.1181 1380 0.0942 1680 190 0.0175 490 0.8063 790 0.1480 1090 0.1184 1390 0.0943 1690 200 0.0175 500 0.8063 800 0.1480 1100 0.1184 1400 0.0943 1700 210 0.0176 510 0.8031 810 0.1480 1110 0.1183 1410 0.0943 1710 220 0.0301 520 0.4130 820 0.1486 1120 0.1101 1420 0.0944 1720 230 0.0301 530 0.4130 830 0.1486 1130 0.1101 1430 0.0944 1730 240 0.0302 540 0.4121 840 0.1485 1140 0.1101 1440 0.0937 1740 250 0.0438 550 0.3083 850 0.1408 1150 0.1103 1450 1750 260 0.0438 560 0.3083 860 0.1408 1160 0.1103 1460 1760 270 0.0440 570 0.3078 870 0.1408 1170 0.1102 1470 1770 280 0.0613 580 0.2350 880 0.1413 1180 0.1020 1480 1780 290 0.0613 590 0.2350 890 0.1413 1190 0.1020 1490 1790 300 0.0615 600 0.2348 900 0.1412 1200 0.1020 1500 1600 I 7 2 01 3 :45 : 1/ / 5 pm Shareware Release page 3 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION 1 BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY r BASIN ID: DEV2YR NAME: DEVELOPED 2 YR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 . 62 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 0 . 60 Acres 2 . 02 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 89 . 00 TC • 7 . 66 min 8 . 59 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns : 0 . 1300 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0500 impTcReach - Sheet L: 300 . 00 ns : 0 . 0500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0500 PEAK RATE: 0 . 53 cfs VOL: 0 . 22 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 0.0206 610 0.1803 910 0.1367 1210 0.1046 1510 20 320 0.0307 620 0.1742 920 0.1378 1220 0.1041 1520 30 330 0.0392 630 0.1736 930 0.1384 1230 0.1041 1530 40 340 0.0470 640 0.1737 940 0.1379 1240 0.1051 1540 50 350 0.0545 650 0.1755 950 0.1390 1250 0.1046 1550 60 360 0.0616 660 0.1769 960 0.1396 1260 0.1045 1560 70 370 0.0661 670 0.1645 970 0.1167 1270 0.1056 1570 80 380 0.0694 680 0.1485 980 0.0896 1280 0.1050 1580 90 390 0.0738 690 0.1450 990 0.0828 1290 0.1050 1590 100 400 0.0787 700 0.1455 1000 0.0803 1300 0.1060 1600 110 410 0.0840 710 0.1453 1010 0.0807 1310 0.1055 1610 120 420 0.0884 720 0.1458 1020 0.0808 1320 0.1054 1620 130 430 0.1375 730 0.1473 1030 0.0955 1330 0.0979 1630 140 440 0.2040 740 0.1474 1040 0.1147 1340 0.0885 1640 150 450 0.2352 750 0.1479 1050 0.1198 1350 0.0862 1650 160 460 0.3363 760 0.1494 1060 0.1212 1360 0.0847 1660 170 470 0.4658 770 0.1494 1070 0.1218 1370 0.0854 1670 180 480 0.5316 780 0.1499 1080 0.1222 1380 0.0856 1680 1 190 490 0.4457 790 0.1370 1090 0.1151 1390 0.0848 1690 200 500 0.3081 800 0.1196 1100 0.1052 1400 0.0856 1700 210 510 0.2780 810 0.1155 1110 0.1029 1410 0.0858 1710 220 520 0.2630 820 0.1147 1120 0.1310 1420 0.0850 1720 230 530 0.2520 830 0.1148 1130 0.1096 1430 0.0858 1730 240 540 0.2525 840 0.1150 1140 0.0767 1440 0.0861 1740 250 0.0001 550 0.2252 850 0.1223 1150 0.0971 1450 0.0535 1750 • 260 0.0014 560 0.1900 860 0.1322 1160 0.1014 1460 0.0135 1760 1 270 0.0040 570 0.1825 870 0.1350 1170 0.1027 1470 0.0035 1770 280 0.0072 580 0.1827 880 0.1352 1180 0.1040 1480 0.0009 1780 290 0.0103 590 0.1834 890 0.1365 1190 0.1036 1490 0.0002 1790 300 0.0135 600 0.1848 900 0.1371 1200 0.1036 1500 1800 7/2/01 3 :45 : 15 pm Shareware Release page 2 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: DEV10YR NAME: DEVELOPED 10 YR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 . 62 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 . 60 Acres 2 . 02 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN 86 . 00 89 . 00 TC 7 . 66 min 8 . 59 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns : 0 . 1300 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0500 impTcReach - Sheet L: 300 . 00 ns : 0 . 0500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0500 PEAK RATE: 1 . 01 cfs VOL: 0 . 38 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 0.0893 610 0.3113 910 0.2241 1210 0.1677 1510 20 320 0.1169 620 0.2998 920 0.2256 1220 0.1667 1520 30 330 0.1331 630 0.2980 930 0.2263 1230 0.1666 1530 40 340 0.1457 640 0.2973 940 0.2254 1240 0.1682 1540 50 350 0.1570 650 0.2995 950 0.2269 1250 0.1672 1550 60 360 0.1676 660 0.3011 960 0.2276 1260 0.1671 1560 70 370 0.1719 670 0.2794 970 0.1901 1270 0.1687 1570 60 380 0.1737 680 0.2516 980 0.1458 1280 0.1677 1580 90 390 0.1790 690 0.2452 990 0.1348 1290 0.1675 1590 100 400 0.1857 700 0.2456 1000 0.1306 1300 0.1691 1600 110 410 0.1932 710 0.2449 1010 0.1311 1310 0.1681 1610 120 420 0.1992 720 0.2453 1020 0.1313 1320 0.1680 1620 130 430 0.3008 730 0.2473 1030 0.1549 1330 0.1559 1630 140 440 0.4351 740 0.2470 1040 0.1860 1340 0.1408 1640 150 450 0.4881 750 0.2475 1050 0.1940 1350 0.1371 1650 160 460 0.6752 760 0.2496 1060 0.1963 1360 0.1347 1660 170 470 0.9092 770 0.2492 1070 0.1971 1370 0.1357 1670 180 480 1.0096 780 0.2497 1080 0.1974 1380 0.1360 1680 190 0.0009 490 0.8313 790 0.2277 1090 0.1859 1390 0.1346 1690 200 0.0042 500 0.5663 800 0.1986 1100 0.1698 1400 0.1359 1700 210 0.0089 510 0.5049 810 0.1915 1110 0.1659 1410 0.1362 1710 220 0.0139 520 0.4735 820 0.1900 1120 0.2111 1420 0.1349 1720 230 0.0190 530 0.4503 830 0.1899 1130 0.1765 1430 0.1361 1730 240 0.0242 540 0.4482 840 0.1901 1140 0.1234 1440 0.1365 1740 250 0.0317 550 0.3977 850 0.2019 1150 0.1562 1450 0.0848 1750 260 0.0403 560 0.3339 860 0.2180 1160 0.1631 1460 0.0214 1760 270 0.0478 570 0.3194 870 0.2224 1170 0.1650 1470 0.0055 1770 280 0.0550 580 0.3186 880 0.2224 1180 0.1670 1480 0.0014 1780 290 0.0613 590 0.3186 890 0.2242 1190 0.1662 1490 0.0004 1790 300 0.0675 600 0.3201 900 0.2250 1200 0.1661 1500 1800 7/2/01 3 :45 : 15 pin Shareware Release page 1 I MONSTER ROAD SITE 1 GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION l BCE #3555 . DETAIL BASIN SUMMARY i BASIN ID: DEV100YR NAME : DEVELOPED 100 YR SBUH METHODOLOGY 1 TOTAL AREA ▪ 2 . 62 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE ▪ TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 . 60 Acres 2 .02 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN 86 . 00 89 . 00 TC • 7 . 66 min 8 . 59 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns : 0 . 1300 p2yr: 2 . 00 ' s : 0 . 0500 impTcReach - Sheet L: 300 . 00 ns : 0 . 0500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0500 PEAK RATE: 1 . 57 cfs VOL: 0 . 58 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 310 0.1867 610 0.4594 910 0.3212 1210 0.2374 1510 20 320 0.2369 620 0.4416 920 0.3232 1220 0.2359 1520 30 330 0.2615 630 0.4383 930 0.3240 1230 0.2356 1530 40 340 0.2789 640 0.4366 940 0.3224 1240 0.2378 1540 50 350 0.2938 650 0.4392 950 0.3244 1250 0.2363 1550 60 360 0.3073 660 0.4409 960 0.3252 1260 0.2361 1560 70 370 0.3099 670 0.4085 970 0.2715 1270 0.2382 1570 80 380 0.3086 680 0.3674 980 0.2082 1280 0.2368 1580 90 390 0.3139 690 0.3577 990 0.1923 1290 0.2365 1590 100 400 0.3217 700 0.3578 1000 0.1862 1300 0.2387 1600 110 410 0.3313 710 0.3564 1010 0.1869 1310 0.2372 1610 120 420 0.3382 720 0.3567 1020 0.1871 1320 0.2369 1620 130 430 0.5037 730 0.3593 1030 0.2208 1330 0.2198 1630 140 440 0.7196 740 0.3585 1040 0.2649 1340 0.1986 1640 150 0.0009 450 0.7964 750 0.3589 1050 0.2763 1350 0.1932 1650 160 0.0055 460 1.0831 760 0.3615 1060 0.2793 1360 0.1898 1660 170 0.0137 470 1.4368 770 0.3607 1070 0.2803 1370 0.1912 1670 180 0.0226 480 1.5719 780 0.3610 1080 0.2807 1380 0.1916 1680 190 0.0318 490 1.2815 790 0.3290 1090 0.2642 1390 0.1896 1690 200 0.0420 500 0.8658 800 0.2867 1100 0.2413 1400 0.1913 1700 210 0.0520 510 0.7668 910 0.2763 1110 0.2356 1410 0.1918 1710 220 0.0612 520 0.7156 820 0.2739 1120 0.2997 1420 0.1898 1720 230 0.0707 530 0.6776 830 0.2736 1130 0.2505 1430 0.1915 1730 240 0.0796 540 0.6720 840 0.2738 1140 0.1751 1440 0.1920 1740 250 0.0931 550 0.5946 850 0.2905 1150 0.2216 1450 0.1192 1750 260 0.1083 560 0.4979 860 0.3135 1160 0.2312 1460 0.0301 1760 270 0.1194 570 0.4751 870 0.3196 1170 0.2338 1470 0.0077 1770 1 280 0.1299 580 0.4729 880 0.3194 1180 0.2367 1480 0.0020 1780 1 290 0.1384 590 0.4719 890 0.3218 1190 0.2354 1490 0.0005 1790 300 0.1468 600 0.4732 900 0.3227 1200 0.2352 1500 0.0001 1800 1 7/2/01 3 :45 :23 pm Shareware Release page 31 1 MONSTER ROAD SITE I GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY HYDROGRAPH No. 1 Peak runoff : 3 . 7277 cfs Total Vol : 1 .40 ac-ft TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN 1 RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 410 0.5345 810 0.8543 1210 0.6248 1610 20 420 0.5446 820 0.8598 1220 0.6255 1620 30 430 0.6899 830 0.8625 1230 0.6257 1630 40 440 0.7616 840 0.8626 1240 0.6273 1640 50 450 0.7769 850 0.8374 1250 0.6280 1650 60 460 0.9809 860 0.8252 1260 0.6282 1660 70 470 1.0795 870 0.8231 1270 0.6298 1670 80 480 1.1263 880 0.8276 1280 0.6305 1680 90 490 2.7942 890 0.8298 1290 0.6307 1690 100 0.0049 500 3.6015 900 0.8298 1300 0.6322 1700 110 0.0049 510 3.7277 910 0.8031 1310 0.6329 1710 120 0.0050 520 2.6783 920 0.7903 1320 0.6331 1720 130 0.0121 530 2.1776 930 0.7880 1330 0.6345 1730 140 0.0121 540 2.0873 940 0.7917 1340 0.6352 1740 150 0.0121 550 1.7867 950 0.7935 1350 0.6348 1750 160 0.0182 560 1.6427 960 0.7935 1360 0.6028 1760 170 0.0182 570 1.6143 970 0.7655 1370 0.5873 1770 180 0.0183 580 1.3886 980 0.7520 1380 0.5846 1780 190 0.0222 590 1.2797 990 0.7497 1390 0.5856 1790 l 200 0.0222 600 1.2598 1000 0.7527 1400 0.5862 1800 210 0.0222 610 1.1994 1010 0.7542 1410 0.5863 1810 220 0.0251 620 1.1707 1020 0.7545 1420 0.5875 1820 230 0.0251 630 1.1646 1030 0.7575 1430 0.5880 1830 240 0.0254 640 1.0976 1040 0.7589 1440 0.5852 1840 250 0.0455 650 1.0652 1050 0.7588 1450 0.2356 1850 260 0.0545 660 1.0590 1060 0.7295 1460 0.0388 1860 270 0.0568 670 1.0143 1070 0.7154 1470 0.0017 1870 280 0.0993 680 0.9929 1080 0.7129 1480 1880 290 0.1202 690 0.9889 1090 0.7153 1490 1890 300 0.1243 700 0.9700 1100 0.7165 1500 1900 310 0.1745 710 0.9608 1110 0.7163 1510 1910 320 0.1993 720 0.9590 1120 0.6861 1520 1920 330 0.2044 730 0.9383 1130 0.6716 1530 1930 340 0.2607 740 0.9284 1140 0.6690 1540 1940 350 0.2893 750 0.9263 1150 0.6709 1550 1950 360 0.2949 760 0.9041 1160 0.6719 1560 1960 I 370 0.3571 770 0.8934 1170 0.6716 1570 1970 380 0.3888 780 0.8911 1180 0.6408 1580 1980 390 0.3956 790 0.8676 1190 0.6259 1590 1990 400 0.4881 800 0.8562 1200 0.6233 1600 2000 7/2/01 3 :45 :23 pm Shareware Release page 32 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY HYDROGRAPH No. 2 Peak runoff : 6 . 9287 cfs Total Vol : 2 .43 ac-ft TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) ' 10 410 1.1892 810 1.4034 1210 0.9936 1610 20 420 1.2102 820 1.4093 1220 0.9943 1620 30 430 1.4847 830 1.4121 1230 0.9945 1630 40 440 1.6183 840 1.4119 1240 0.9961 1640 50 450 1.6474 850 1.3680 1250 0.9969 1650 60 460 1.9974 860 1.3466 1260 0.9971 1660 70 0.0028 470 2.1663 870 1.3429 1270 0.9987 1670 80 0.0028 480 2.2493 880 1.3476 1280 0.9994 1680 90 0.0029 490 5.2442 890 1.3500 1290 0.9996 1690 100 0.0154 500 6.6988 900 1.3497 1300 1.0011 1700 110 0.0154 510 6.9287 910 1.3040 1310 1.0018 1710 120 0.0155 520 4.8711 920 1.2820 1320 1.0020 1720 130 0.0263 530 3.8775 930 1.2781 1330 1.0035 1730 140 0.0263 540 3.6939 940 1.2819 1340 1.0042 1740 150 0.0263 550 3.1258 950 1.2838 1350 1.0034 1750 160 0.0351 560 2.8531 960 1.2835 1360 0.9521 1760 170 0.0351 570 2.7985 970 1.2364 1370 0.9274 1770 ' 180 0.0356 580 2.3904 980 1.2137 1380 0.9229 1780 190 0.0655 590 2.1933 990 1.2097 1390 0.9238 1790 200 0.0796 600 2.1565 1000 1.2128 1400 0.9244 1800 210 0.0828 610 2.0418 1010 1.2143 1410 0.9245 1810 220 0.1402 620 1.9871 1020 1.2146 1420 0.9257 1820 230 0.1705 630 1.9753 1030 1.2178 1430 0.9262 1830 240 0.1766 640 1.8535 1040 1.2193 1440 0.9217 1840 250 0.2387 650 1.7944 1050 1.2188 1450 0.3709 1850 260 0.2705 660 1.7828 1060 1.1704 1460 0.0617 1860 270 0.2772 670 1.7012 1070 1.1470 1470 0.0030 1870 280 0.3561 680 1.6621 1080 1.1428 1480 1880 290 0.3962 690 1.6545 1090 1.1452 1490 1890 300 0.4040 700 1.6175 1100 1.1464 1500 1900 310 0.4929 710 1.5997 1110 1.1459 1510 1910 320 0.5380 720 1.5959 1120 1.0965 1520 1920 330 0.5473 730 1.5570 1130 1.0727 1530 1930 I 340 0.6488 740 1.5381 1140 1.0684 1540 1940 •.350 0.7005 750 1.5342 1150 1.0703 1550 1950 360 0.7111 760 1.4934 1160 1.0713 1560 1960 370 0.8349 770 1.4738 1170 1.0707 1570 1970 380 0.8957 780 1.4695 1180 1.0206 1580 1980 390 0.9097 790 1.4274 1190 0.9965 1590 1990 400 1.0978 800 1.4069 1200 0.9921 1600 2000 1 7/2/01 3 :45 :23 pm Shareware Release page 33 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY i HYDROGRAPH No. 3 Peak runoff : 10 . 8918 cfs Total Vol : 3 . 71 ac-ft TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 410 2.0836 810 2.0493 1210 1.4230 1610 20 420 2.1159 820 2.0551 1220 1.4238 1620 30 430 2.5348 830 2.0579 1230 1.4239 1630 40 440 2.7383 840 2.0573 1240 1.4255 1640 50 450 2.7828 850 1.9909 1250 1.4262 1650 60 460 3.3040 860 1.9586 1260 1.4264 1660 70 0.0103 470 3.5547 870 1.9529 1270 1.4279 1670 80 0.0103 480 3.6811 880 1.9575 1280 1.4286 1680 90 0.0104 490 8.2951 890 1.9598 1290 1.4288 1690 100 0.0304 500 10.5349 900 1.9591 1300 1.4302 1700 110 0.0304 510 10.8918 910 1.8909 1310 1.4309 1710 120 0.0305 520 7.5583 920 1.8580 1320 1.4311 1720 130 0.0450 530 5.9437 930 1.8521 1330 1.4325 1730 140 0.0451 540 5.6409 940 1.8557 1340 1.4332 1740 150 0.0461 550 4.7398 950 1.8575 1350 1.4320 1750 160 0.1168 560 4.3082 960 1.8570 1360 1.3582 1760 170 0.1500 570 4.2209 970 1.7872 1370 1.3226 1770 180 0.1573 580 3.5900 980 1.7537 1380 1.3161 1780 190 0.2562 590 3.2856 990 1.7476 1390 1.3169 1790 200 0.3090 600 3.2280 1000 1.7505 1400 1.3175 1800 210 0.3190 610 3.0459 1010 1.7520 1410 1.3176 1810 220 0.4014 620 2.9592 1020 1.7523 1420 1.3187 1820 230 0.4457 630 2.9403 1030 1.7554 1430 1.3192 1830 240 0.4546 640 2.7516 1040 1.7568 1440 1.3127 1840 250 0.5488 650 2.6602 1050 1.7560 1450 0.5279 1850 260 0.5979 660 2.6420 1060 1.6850 1460 0.0885 1860 270 0.6083 670 2.5154 1070 1.6508 1470 0.0045 1870 280 0.7405 680 2.4548 1080 1.6446 1480 1880 290 0.8073 690 2.4428 1090 1.6467 1490 1890 300 0.8210 700 2.3834 1100 1.6479 1500 1900 310 0.9834 710 2.3547 1110 1.6471 1510 1910 320 1.0625 720 2.3486 1120 1.5750 1520 1920 I 1 330 1.0798 730 2.2873 1130 1.5404 1530 1930 340 1.2545 740 2.2576 1140 1.5341 1540 1940 350 1.3403 750 2.2513 1150 1.5358 1550 1950 l 360 1.3586 760 2.1879 1160 1.5367 1560 1960 370 1.5440 770 2.1575 1170 1.5359 1570 1970 380 1.6343 780 2.1508 1180 1.4631 1580 1980 390 1.6557 790 2.0862 1190 1.4281 1590 1990 400 1.9437 800 2.0548 1200 1.4217 1600 2000 i 1 I I 1 1 1 7/2/01 3 :45 :23 pm Shareware Release page 34 i MONSTER ROAD SITE I GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 1 DETAIL HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY 1 1 HYDROGRAPH No. 4 Peak runoff : 4 . 8237 cfs Total Vol : 1 . 73 ac-ft TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN 1 RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF I (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 410 0.9038 810 0.9595 1210 0.6816 1610 20 420 0.9077 820 0.9645 1220 0.6820 1620 30 430 1.1685 830 0.9660 1230 0.6821 1630 40 440 1.1951 840 0.9657 1240 0.6835 1640 50 450 1.2005 850 0.9232 1250 0.6839 1650 60. 460 1.5252 860 0.9187 1260 0.6840 1660 70 0.0007 470 1.5623 870 0.9185 1270 0.6853 1670 80 0.0007 480 1.5950 880 0.9226 1280 0.6858 1680 90 0.0011 490 4.5372 890 0.9238 1290 0.6858 1690 100 0.0565 500 4.8229 900 0.9235 1300 0.6871 1700 110 0.0565 510 4.8237 910 0.8797 1310 0.6876 1710 120 0.0572 520 2.7075 920 0.8748 1320 0.6876 1720 130 0.1382 530 2.5529 930 0.8745 1330 0.6889 1730 ._ 140 0.1382 540 2.5365 940 0.8778 1340 0.6893 1740 1 150 0.1387 550 1.9718 950 0.8789 1350 0.6889 1750 160 0.2090 560 1.9245 960 0.8785 1360 0.6402 1760 170 0.2090 570 1.9173 970 0.8335 1370 0.6339 1770 180 0.2094 580 1.5169 980 0.8284 1380 0.6334 1780 190 0.2545 590 1.4790 990 0.8280 1390 0.6345 1790 200 0.2545 600 1.4751 1000 0.8308 1400 0.6348 1800 210 0.2548 610 1.3622 1010 0.8316 1410 0.6348 1810 220 0.2879 620 1.3529 1020 0.8317 1420 0.6359 1820 230 0.2879 630 1.3510 1030 0.8344 1430 0.6362 1830 240 0.2883 640 1.2315 1040 0.8352 1440 0.6324 1840 250 0.3339 650 1.2203 1050 0.8348 1450 0.0925 1850 260 0.3339 660 1.2186 1060 0.7888 1460 0.0071 1860 270 0.3345 670 1.1393 1070 0.7832 1470 1870 280 0.4077 680 1.1319 1080 0.7828 1480 1880 290 0.4085 690 1.1310 1090 0.7850 1490 1890 1 300 0.4092 700 1.0943 1100 0.7857 1500 1900 310 0.4885 710 1.0915 1110 0.7852 1510 1910 320 0.4898 720 1.0909 1120 0.7384 1520 1920 I 330 0.4906 730 1.0526 1130 0.7326 1530 1930 I 340 0.5786 740 1.0494 1140 0.7322 1540 1940 I 350 0.5826 750 1.0488 1150 0.7340 1550•• 1950 360 0.5839 760 1.0090 1160 0.7345 1560 1960 370 0.6936 770 1.0054 1170 0.7341 1570 1970 380 0.7061 780 1.0047 1180 0.6865 1580 1980 390 0.7086 790 0.9637 1190 0.6806 1590 1990 400 0.8861 800 0.9597 1200 0.6801 1600 2000 i ii I II 7/2/01 3 :45 :23 pm Shareware Release page 35 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY HYDROGRAPH No. 5 Peak runoff : 8 . 1398 cfs Total Vol : 2 . 83 ac-ft TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 410 1.6455 810 1.5154 1210 1.0542 1610 20 420 1.6525 820 1.5208 1220 1.0546 1620 i 30 430 2.0741 830 1.5224 1230 1.0547 1630 40 440 2.1263 840 1.5218 1240 1.0561 1640 50 450 2.1360 850 1.4535 1250 1.0566 1650 60 0.0003 460 2.6521 860 1.4450 1260 1.0566 1660 70 0.0322 470 2.7210 870 1.4444 1270 1.0580 1670 80 0.0322 480 2.7771 880 1.4487 1280 1.0584 1680 90 0.0334 490 7.5686 890 1.4501 1290 1.0585 1690 100 0.1769 500 8.1339 900 1.4494 1300 1.0598 1700 110 0.1769 510 8.1398 910 1.3797 1310 1.0602 1710 120 0.1779 520 4.5709 920 1.3707 1320 1.0603 1720 ' 130 0.3011 530 4.2128 930 1.3701 1330 1.0616 1730 140 0.3011 540 4.1771 940 1.3736 1340 1.0620 1740 l 150 0.3019 550 3.2391 950 1.3747 1350 1.0613 1750 160 0.4019 560 3.1377 960 1.3741 1360 0.9863 1760 170 0.4019 570 3.1239 970 1.3030 1370 0.9759 1770 180 0.4024 580 2.4698 980 1.2937 1380 0.9751 1780 190 0.4587 590 2.3942 990 1.2931 1390 0.9761 1790 200 0.4588 600 2.3868 1000 1.2959 1400 0.9764 1800 210 0.4593 610 2.1986 1010 1.2968 1410 0.9765 1810 220 0.5120 620 2.1782 1020 1.2970 1420 0.9775 1820 230 0.5133 630 2.1747 1030 1.2997 1430 0.9778 1830 240 0.5140 640 1.9791 1040 1.3006 1440 0.9721 1840 250 0.5939 650 1.9563 1050 1.2998 1450 0.1503 1850 260 0.5958 660 1.9532 1060 1.2277 1460 0.0116 1860 270 0.5972 670 1.8231 1070 1.2179 1470 1870 280 0.7348 680 1.8079 1080 1.2172 1480 1880 290 0.7466 690 1.8062 1090 1.2195 1490 1890 300 0.7492 700 1.7443 1100 1.2202 1500 1900 310 0.9063 710 1.7378 1110 1.2195 1510 1910 320 0.9252 720 1.7366 1120 1.1464 1520 1920 330 0.9284 730 1.6729 1130 1.1365 1530 1930 340 1.0947 740 1.6659 1140 1.1357 1540 1940 350 1.1166 750 1.6647 1150 1.1375 1550 1950 • 360 1.1200 760 1.5993 1160 1.1381 1560 1960 370 1.2940 770 1.5918 1170 1.1374 1570 1970 380 1.3184 780 1.5906 1180 1.0636 1580 1980 390 1.3230 790 1.5239 1190 1.0535 1590 1990 400 1.6101 800 1.5159 1200 1.0527 1600 2000 7/2/01 3 :45 :23 pm Shareware Release page 36 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY HYDROGRAPH No. 6 Peak runoff : 12 . 1830 cfs Total Vol : 4 . 17 ac-ft TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 410 2.5917 810 2.1677 1210 1.4879 1610 20 420 2.6025 820 2.1730 1220 1.4884 1620 30 430 3.2154 830 2.1747 1230 1.4884 1630 40 440 3.2995 840 2.1737 1240 1.4898 1640 50 450 3.3142 850 2.0748 1250 1.4902 1650 60 0.0009 460 4.0549 860 2.0613 1260 1.4903 1660 70 0.1175 470 4.1621 870 2.0604 1270 1.4915 1670 80 0.1175 480 4.2466 880 2.0646 1280 1.4920 1680 90 0.1194 490 11.2540 890 2.0660 1290 1.4920 1690 100 0.3483 500 12.1702 900 2.0650 1300 1.4933 1700 110 0.3483 510 12.1830 910 1.9646 1310 1.4937 1710 120 0.3497 520 6.8357 920 1.9507 1320 1.4937 1720 130 0.5137 530 6.2076 930 1.9496 1330 1.4949 1730 140 0.5137 540 6.1466 940 1.9531 1340 1.4953 1740 150 0.5148 550 4.7565 950 1.9542 1350 1.4944 1750 160 0.6494 560 4.5852 960 1.9533 1360 1.3888 1760 170 0.6500 570 4.5631 970 1.8514 1370 1.3734 1770 180 0.6508 580 3.6048 980 1.8373 1380 1.3722 1780 190 0.7406 590 3.4818 990 1.8362 1390 1.3732 1790 200 0.7433 600 3.4697 1000 1.8390 1400 1.3735 1800 210 0.7442 610 3.1906 1010 1.8399 1410 1.3735 1810 220 0.8349 620 3.1560 1020 1.8400 1420 1.3745 1820 230 0.8474 630 3.1503 1030 1.8426 1430 1.3748 1830 240 0.8500 640 2.8635 1040 1.8435 1440 1.3668 1840 250 1.0022 650 2.8263 1050 1.8424 1450 0.2174 1850 260 1.0246 660 2.8213 1060 1.7396 1460 0.0168 1860 270 1.0286 670 2.6303 1070 1.7249 1470 1870 280 1.2449 680 2.6055 1080 1.7238 1480 1880 290 1.2726 690 2.6026 1090 1.7260 1490 1890 300 1.2772 700 2.5103 1100 1.7267 1500 1900 310 1.5062 710 2.4990 1110 1.7256 1510 1910 ' 320 1.5381 720 2.4971 1120 1.6219 1520 1920 330 1.5432 730 2.4029 1130 1.6070 1530 1930 i 340 1.7826 740 2.3910 1140 1.6059 1540 1940 350 1.8181 750 2.3891 1150 1.6076 1550 1950 . 360 1.8234 760 2.2931 1160 1.6082 1560 1960 370 2.0711 770 2.2807 1170 1.6072 1570 1970 380 2.1094 780 2.2788 1180 1.5028 1580 1980 390 2.1164 790 2.1814 1190 1.4877 1590 1990 400 2.5343 800 2.1686 1200 1.4866 1600 2000 t 1 7/2/01 3 :45 :23 pm Shareware Release page 38 MONSTER ROAD SITE I GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION 1 BCE #3555 STAGE STORAGE TABLE II TRAPEZOIDAL BASIN ID No. POND2 Description: ORIGINAL DESIGN POND Length: 61 . 72 ft . Width: 20 . 00 ft . Side Slope 1 : 3 Side Slope 3 : 3 Side Slope 2 : 3 Side Slope 4 : 3 Infiltration Rate : 0 . 00 min/inch II STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- 20.00 0.0000 0.0000 21.80 3086 0.0708 23.60 8181 0.1878 25.40 15704 0.3605 20.10 125.90 0.0029 21.90 3313 0.0760 23.70 8531 0.1959 25.50 16202 0.3719 20.20 256.78 0.0059 22.00 3545 0.0814 23.80 8889 0.2041 25.60 16708 0.3836 20.30 392.71 0.0090 22.10 3785 0.0869 23.90 9255 0.2125 25.70 17224 0.3954 20.40 533.75 0.0123 22.20 4030 0.0925 24.00 9628 0.2210 25.80 17748 0.4074 20.50 679.99 0.0156 22.30 4282 0.0983 24.10 10009 0.2298 25.90 18282 0.4197 20.60 831.49 0.0191 22.40 4541 0.1042 24.20 10398 0.2387 26.00 18824 0.4321 20.70 988.32 0.0227 22.50 4806 0.1103 24.30 10795 0.2478 26.10 19376 0.4448 20.80 1151 0.0264 22.60 5078 0.1166 24.40 11200 0.2571 26.20 19937 0.4577 20.90 1318 0.0303 22.70 5356 0.1230 24.50 11613 0.2666 26.30 20508 0.4708 21.00 1492 0.0342 22.80 5642 0.1295 24.60 12034 0.2763 26.40 21088 0.4841 21.10 1670 0.0383 22.90 5934 0.1362 24.70 12463 0.2861 26.50 21677 0.4976 21.20 1855 0.0426 23.00 6234 0.1431 24.80 12901 0.2962 26.60 22276 0.5114 21.30 2045 0.0470 23.10 6540 0.1501 24.90 13347 0.3064 26.70 22885 0.5254 21.40 2242 0.0515 23.20 6854 0.1573 25.00 13801 0.3168 26.80 23503 0.5396 21.50 2444 0.0561 23.30 7175 0.1647 25.10 14264 0.3275 26.90 24132 0.5540 21.60 2652 0.0609 23.40 7503 0.1722 25.20 14735 0.3383 27.00 24770 0.5686 21.70 2866 0.0658 23.50 7838 0.1799 25.30 15215 0.3493 I 1 I I 7/2/01 3 :45 :23 pm Shareware Release page 41 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. ORIFICE Description: FLOW CONTROL STRUCTURE Outlet Elev: 20 . 00 Elev: 18 . 00 ft Orifice Diameter: 6 . 6900 in. Elev: 21 . 10 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 9 . 1100 in. Elev: 22 . 10 ft Orifice 3 Diameter: 9 . 0300 in. STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs 20.00 0.0000 20.80 1.0863 21.60 3.1288 22.40 5.6614 20.10 0.3841 20.90 1.1522 21.70 3.3281 22.50 5.9846 20.20 0.5432 21.00 1.2145 21.80 3.5138 22.60 6.2814 20.30 0.6652 21.10 1.2738 21.90 3.6885 22.70 6.5585 20.40 0.7681 21.20 2.0427 22.00 3.8542 22.80 6.8201 20.50 0.8588 21.30 2.3920 22.10 4.0122 22.90 7.0691 20.60 0.9408 21.40 2.6706 22.20 4.8633 23.00 7.3073 20.70 1.0162 21.50 2.9119 22.30 5.2987 I 7/2/01 3 :45 :27 pm Shareware Release page 43 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- <-PEAK-> OUTFLOW STORAGE < DESCRIPTION > (cfs) (cfs) --id- --id- <-STAGE> id (cfs) VOL (cf) 2 YEAR EVENT 3.73 4.82 POND2 ORIFICE 22.10 7 4.05 3794.87 cf 10 YEAR EVENT 6.93 8.14 POND2 ORIFICE 22.91 8 7.09 5966.04 cf 100 YEAR EVENT 10.89 12.18 POND2 ORIFICE 24.05 9 9.41 9827.92 cf 1 7/2/01 3 : 52 : 15 pm Shareware Release page 1 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY i HYDROGRAPH No. 7 Peak runoff : 5 . 1311 cfs Total Vol : 1 . 94 ac-ft TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 410 0.9877 810 1.0750 1210 0.7862 1610 20 420 0.9961 820 1.0792 1220 0.7861 1620 30 430 1.3060 830 1.0808 1230 0.7661 1630 40 440 1.3991 840 1.0807 1240 0.7886 1640 50 450 1.4356 850 1.0455 1250 0.7885 1650 60 460 1.8616 860 1.0509 1260 0.7885 1660 70 0.0007 470 2.0282 870 1.0535 1270 0.7909 1670 80 0.0007 480 2.1266 880 1.0578 1280 0.7908 1680 90 0.0011 490 4.9829 890 1.0603 1290 0.7908 1690 100 0.0565 500 5.1311 900 1.0605 1300 0.7932 1700 110 0.0565 510 5.1016 910 1.0164 1310 0.7930 1710 120 0.0572 520 2.9705 920 1.0126 1320 0.7930 1720 130 0.1382 530 2.8048 930 1.0128 1330 0.7868 1730 140 0.1382 540 2.7889 940 1.0158 1340 0.7778 1740 150 0.1387 550 2.1970 950 1.0179 1350 0.7751 1750 160 0.2090 560 2.1145 960 1.0181 1360 0.7249 1760 170 0.2090 570 2.0999 970 0.9503 1370 0.7193 1770 180 0.2094 560 1.6996 980 0.9180 1380 0.7190 1780 190 0.2545 590 1.6623 990 0.9109 1390 0.7192 1790 200 0.2545 600 1.6600 1000 0.9111 1400 0.7204 1800 210 0.2548 610 1.5425 1010 0.9123 1410 0.7207 1810 220 0.2879 620 1.5271 1020 0.9126 1420 0.7209 1820 230 0.2879 630 1.5246 1030 0.9299 1430 0.7220 1830 240 0.2883 640 1.4052 1040 0.9499 1440 0.7186 1840 250 0.3340 650 1.3957 1050 0.9546 1450 0.1460 1850 260 0.3353 660 1.3955 1060 0.9100 1460 0.0206 1860 270 0.3385 670 1.3038 1070 0.9050 1470 0.0035 1870 280 0.4149 680 1.2804 1080 0.9050 1480 0.0009 1880 290 0.4188 690 1.2760 1090 0.9001 1490 0.0002 1890 300 0.4226 700 1.2398 1100 0.8909 1500 1900 310 0.5092 710 1.2368 1110 0.8881 1510 1910 320 0.5205 720 1.2368 1120 0.8694 1520 1920 330 0.5298 730 1.1999 1130 0.8422 1530 1930 340 0.6257 740 1.1968 1140 0.8089 1540 1940 1 350 0.6371 750 1.1967 1150 0.8311 1550 1950 360 0.6455 760 1.1584 1160 0.8359 1560 1960 370 0.7597 770 1.1548 1170 0.8367 1570 1970 380 0.7755 780 1.1547 1180 0.7906 1580 1980 390 0.7825 790 1.1007 1190 0.7841 1590 1990 400 0.9649 800 1.0793 1200 0.7837 1600 2000 l 7/2/01 3 : 52 : 15 pm Shareware Release page 2 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 DETAIL HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY HYDROGRAPH No. 8 Peak runoff : 8 . 7001 cfs Total Vol : 3 . 21 ac-ft TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 410 1.8387 810 1.7069 1210 1.2219 1610 20 420 1.8517 820 1.7108 1220 1.2214 1620 30 430 2.3749 830 1.7123 1230 1.2213 1630 40 440 2.5614 840 1.7119 1240 1.2243 1640 50 450 2.6240 850 1.6554 1250 1.2238 1650 60 0.0003 460 3.3273 860 1.6629 1260 1.2237 1660 70 0.0322 470 3.6302 870 1.6668 1270 1.2266 1670 80 0.0322 480 3.7866 880 1.6711 1280 1.2261 1680 90 0.0334 490 8.3998 890 1.6743 1290 1.2260 1690 100 0.1769 500 8.7001 900 1.6744 1300 1.2289 1700 110 0.1769 510 8.6447 910 1.6038 1310 1.2283 1710 120 0.1779 520 5.0444 920 1.5963 1320 1.2283 1720 130 0.3011 530 4.6631 930 1.5964 1330 1.2175 1730 140 0.3011 540 4.6253 940 1.5990 1340 1.2029 1740 150 0.3019 550 3.6368 950 1.6016 1350 1.1984 1750 160 0.4019 560 3.4716 960 1.6017 1360 1.1211 1760 170 0.4019 570 3.4434 970 1.4931 1370 1.1115 1770 180 0.4024 580 2.7884 980 1.4396 1380 1.1111 1780 190 0.4596 590 2.7128 990 1.4278 1390 1.1107 1790 200 0.4630 600 2.7068 1000 1.4265 1400 1.1123 1800 210 0.4682 610 2.5099 1010 1.4279 1410 1.1127 1810 220 0.5258 620 2.4780 1020 1.4282 1420 1.1124 1820 230 0.5322 630 2.4726 1030 1.4546 1430 1.1139 1830 240 0.5382 640 2.2763 1040 1.4866 1440 1.1086 1840 250 0.6256 650 2.2558 1050 1.4939 1450 0.2350 1850 260 0.6362 660 2.2543 1060 1.4240 1460 0.0330 1860 270 0.6450 670 2.1025 1070 1.4150 1470 0.0055 1870 280 0.7898 680 2.0595 1080 1.4147 1480 0.0014 1880 290 0.8079 690 2.0514 1090 1.4054 1490 0.0004 1890 300 0.8167 700 1.9899 1100 1.3900 1500 1900 310 0.9956 710 1.9826 1110 1.3854 1510 1910 320 1.0422 720 1.9819 1120 1.3575 1520 1920 330 1.0615 730 1.9203 1130 1.3130 1530 1930 340 1.2404 740 1.9129 1140 1.2591 1540 1940 350 1.2736 750 1.9122 1150 1.2938 1550 1950 360 1.2876 760 1.8489 1160 1.3012 1560 1960 370 1.4659 770 1.8410 1170 1.3023 1570 1970 380 1.4921 780 1.8403 1180 1.2307 1580 1980 390 1.5020 790 1.7516 1190 1.2197 1590 1990 400 1.7958 800 1.7145 1200 1.2188 1600 2000 I 7/2/01 3 :52 : 15 pm Shareware Release page . 3 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 . DETAIL HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY HYDROGRAPH No. 9 Peak runoff : 13 . 0360 cfs Total Vol : 4 . 75 ac-ft TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN TIME DESIGN RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) (min) (cfs) 10 410 2.9229 810 2.4440 1210 1.7253 1610 20 420 2.9406 820 2.4469 1220 1.7243 1620 30 430 3.7191 830 2.4483 1230 1.7241 1630 40 440 4.0191 840 2.4475 1240 1.7276 1640 50 450 4.1106 850 2.3653 1250 1.7265 1650 60 0.0009 460 5.1379 860 2.3748 1260 1.7263 1660 70 0.1175 470 5.5989 870 2.3799 1270 1.7298 1670 80 0.1175 480 5.8185 880 2.3840 1280 1.7287 1680 90 0.1194 490 12.5355 890 2.3878 1290 1.7285 1690 100 0.3483 500 13.0360 900 2.3877 1300 1.7319 1700 110 0.3483 510 12.9497 910 2.2857 1310 1.7309 1710 120 0.3497 520 7.5513 920 2.2738 1320 1.7306 1720 130 0.5137 530 6.8853 930 2.2736 1330 1.7148 1730 140 0.5137 540 6.8186 940 2.2755 1340 1.6939 1740 150 0.5157 550 5.3510 950 2.2786 1350 1.6876 1750 160 0.6549 560 5.0831 960 2.2785 1360 1.5786 1760 170 0.6638 570 5.0382 970 2.1229 1370 1.5645 1770 180 0.6734 580 4.0777 980 2.0454 1380 1.5638 1780 190 0.7723 590 3.9537 990 2.0285 1390 1.5627 1790 200 0.7852 600 3.9429 1000 2.0252 1400 1.5648 1800 210 0.7961 610 3.6500 1010 2.0268 1410 1.5653 1810 220 0.8961 620 3.5976 1020 2.0271 1420 1.5643 1820 230 0.9181 630 3.5886 1030 2.0634 1430 1.5663 1830 240 0.9295 640 3.3000 1040 2.1084 1440 1.5589 1840 250 1.0953 650 3.2654 1050 2.1187 1450 0.3366 1850 260 1.1329 660 3.2622 1060 2.0190 1460 0.0469 1860 270 1.1480 670 3.0389 1070 2.0052 1470 0.0077 1870 280 1.3748 680 2.9730 1080 2.0046 1480 0.0020 1880 290 1.4109 690 2.9603 1090 1.9902 1490 0.0005 1890 ' 300 1.4241 700 2.8681 1100 1.9679 1500 0.0001 1900 310 1.6929 710 2.8554 1110 1.9612 1510 1910 320 1.7750 720 2.8538 1120 1.9216 1520 1920 330 1.8047 730 2.7622 1130 1.8576 1530 1930 340 2.0615 740 2.7495 1140 1.7810 1540 1940 350 2.1119 750 2.7480 1150 1.8292 1550 •.1950 360 2.1307 760 2.6546 1160 1.8394 1560 1960 370 2.3810 770 2.6414 1170 1.8409 1570 1970 380 2.4180 780 2.6398 1180 1.7394 1580 1980 390 2.4303 790 2.5104 1190 1.7231 1590 1990 I 400 2.8560 800 2.4553 1200 1.7217 1600 2000 I - II I 7/2/01 3 : 52 : 15 pm Shareware Release page 4 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION i ) BCE #3555 STAGE STORAGE TABLE TRAPEZOIDAL BASIN ID No. POND3 Description: PROPOSED DETENTION POND Length: 170 . 00 ft . Width: 15 . 00 ft . Side Slope 1 : 3 Side Slope 3 : 3 Side Slope 2 : 3 Side Slope 4 : 3 Infiltration Rate : 0 . 00 min/inch STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- 20.00 0.0000 0.0000 21.30 4279 0.0982 22.60 10593 0.2432 23.90 19098 0.4384 20.10 260.56 0.0060 21.40 4691 0.1077 22.70 11167 0.2564 24.00 19848 0.4556 20.20 532.30 0.0122 21.50 5114 0.1174 22.80 11755 0.2698 24.10 20612 0.4732 20.30 815.27 0.0187 21.60 5550 0.1274 22.90 12355 0.2836 24.20 21389 0.4910 20.40 1110 0.0255 21.70 5998 0.1377 23.00 12969 0.2977 24.30 22181 0.5092 20.50 1415 0.0325 21.80 6458 0.1483 23.10 13596 0.3121 24.40 22987 0.5277 20.60 1732 0.0398 21.90 6931 0.1591 23.20 14236 0.3268 24.50 23807 0.5465 20.70 2061 0.0473 22.00 7416 0.1702 23.30 14890 0.3418 24.60 24642 0.5657 20.80 2401 0.0551 22.10 7914 0.1817 23.40 15557 0.3571 24.70 25491 0.5852 20.90 2753 0.0632 22.20 8424 0.1934 23.50 16238 0.3728 24.80 26354 0.6050 21.00 3117 0.0716 22.30 8947 0.2054 23.60 16933 0.3887 24.90 27232 0.6252 21.10 3493 0.0802 22.40 9483 0.2177 23.70 17641 0.4050 25.00 28125 0.6457 21.20 3880 0.0891 22.50 10031 0.2303 23.80 18363 0.4215 III . I 7/2/01 3 : 52 : 15 pm Shareware Release page 5 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. ORIFICE Description: FLOW CONTROL STRUCTURE Outlet Elev: 20 . 00 Elev: 18 . 00 ft Orifice Diameter: 6 . 6900 in. Elev: 21 . 10 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 9 . 1100 in. Elev: 22 . 10 ft Orifice 3 Diameter: 9 . 0300 in. STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs 20.00 0.0000 20.80 1.0863 21.60 3.1288 22.40 5.6614 20.10 0.3841 20.90 1.1522 21.70 3.3281 22.50 5.9846 20.20 0.5432 21.00 1.2145 21.80 3.5138 22.60 6.2814 20.30 0.6652 21.10 1.2738 21.90 3.6885 22.70 6.5585 20.40 0.7681 21.20 2.0427 22.00 3.8542 22.80 6.8201 20.50 0.8588 21.30 2.3920 22.10 4.0122 22.90 7.0691 20.60 0.9408 21.40 2.6706 22.20 4.8633 23.00 7.3073 20.70 1.0162 21.50 2.9119 22.30 5.2987 7/2/01 3 : 52 : 17 pm Shareware Release page 6 MONSTER ROAD SITE GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION BCE #3555 LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- <-PEAK-> OUTFLOW STORAGE DESCRIPTION > (cfs) (cfs) --id- --id- <-STAGE> id (cfs) VOL (cf) 2 YEAR EVENT 3.73 5.13 POND3 ORIFICE 21.91 10 3.70 6959.47 cf 10 YEAR EVENT 6.93 8.70 POND3 ORIFICE 22.70 11 6.56 11175.74 cf 100 YEAR EVENT 10.89 13.04 POND3 ORIFICE 23.74 12 8.84 17917.44 cf II� PECIAL REP STUDIES V. S RT AND SORTSN S U V. SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES • Original hydraulic analysis and design report: Regional Disposal Company,Black River CDL facility by Reid Middleton. • Geotechnical Engineering Study-AnMarCo Pproperty,Beacon Coal Mine Road and Monster Road, by Earth Consultants,Inc.,January 18, 2002,job number E9875 3555.005 [JMHJbq] OILIC.1 LI AL EtbottiT Hydraulic Analysis and Design Report Regional Disposal Company Black River CDL Facility REID MIDDLETON TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Project Overview II. Preliminary Conditions Summary III. Off-Site Analysis IV. Detention Analysis and Design V. Conveyance Systems Analysis and Design VI. Special Reports and Studies VII. Basin and Community Planning Areas VITI. Other Permits IX. Erosion/Sedimentation Control Design X. .Bond Quantities Worksheet, Retention/ Detention Facility Summary Sheet and Sketch XI. Maintenance and Operations Manual II . I. PROJECT OVERVIEW I PROJECT OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION The Black River CDL is located in Section 14, T23N, RSE, W.M. The property is bounded on the east by 68th Avenue South and Mine Access Road. The Union Pacific and Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way bounds the property on the south and west sides. The site contains 17.6± acres. The project site is predominately clear with trees and brush along the east boundary adjacent to 68th Avenue N.E. and Mine Access Road. Brush patches and small deciduous trees exist along the southerly portion of the west boundary. EXISTING DRAINAGE The site drains to the west and to the north. Major fills on the site have created • a swale in the northern part of the property which acts as a cutoff for drainage and redirects drainage to the north into the Class III Wetland. The northern one-third of the property sheetflows to the west to a sharply defined ditch created by the fill for the railroad grade and the site fill The ditch reduces in depth to the south and disappears at about midpoint of the property. The southern portion of the property sheet flows westerly to the toe of the railroad fill. The site is located in the Duamish River Sub-basin of the Green River Basin. A Class III Wetland exists at the extreme northern end of the property. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS li The site is being developed as a collection/shipping facility for construction debris. Improvements will include an office, waste transfer building, scales, scale house and a large paved area for container storage, heavy forklift loading, truck maneuvering and a railroad spur. DEVELOPED DRAINAGE CONCEPT Storm water runoff will be collected in a piped drainage system and conveyed to a 3-cell wetpond. The drainage system will prevent storm water from reaching the railroad fill. Some runoff will sheet flow to the wetpond. The wetpond will also contain staged storage for storm water detention. The wetpond will flow into the existing Class III Wetland and then through a 24 inch steel pipe under the railroad right-of-way and into the Duamish River. II i • II. PRELIMINARY COND ITIONS SUMMARY r it I . - - UNITED STATES *ES QUADRANGLE"`) ARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GTON—KING CO.ERIES (TOPOGRAPI i1C;o 5, GEOLOGICAL SURVEY •- 9 M, s56 122'. R.4 E. R.5 E. • SEATTLE(ctrr P.O.)10 M): '30" V-NP-R`Ra•)i.' ,1i.A ,, , 11%f. '. - i '460':Vi 4.L. y 1 1,®®`��. 1 ' ,- R„,, ... ..i-t::4+:„, i ,arypt-riL , tp.....1vv,,,,.-,4141,i N : N Y 4,11k ii j; 1111:11111016,4 - 1 • . N•-•,.11,.. ‘ • . �i1i8a��f• I ' i r i Birk, .-1 WA • :i;" i. f.y 1{�(uy�`• c{{� 1IfI Iii11011111 t \ i f- 1 i •\ ' 1L$ ! E . E.: •.•4 7 N -.-\ TON . If i •o Sewage 1, i _ .14H.. §, 1 \�' \.. u` AR'ORT • 4i4posat. ='�. ► ens : \ �q� • Qlil �'\,i: . I • v. --ter' i. • v, •30,,‘ , dk, _Agifil.._, _ Lit ��A. \� �%d ''�i�•, : ; -44‘ ., ...71 =.__,� �, .I _���— gel• Ai 4: I : :4; . •• li ' if ,,, . ...„...._ R .-iyi ,...... ,..... ...T.-...,r„„ . . _/.. ._•\`)t„t.-.„ -_•\d-iT)1 4k,l yT-. u,..,4.h/ H\'..•wmIkr i i.i Tiimk,Ni-eijom o i.it. g.l,„i—'.!... Foster.I` / l`• Golf I•y•r,,'\,,-4,t,\1I.-.: \� 14 �� an i4i I :. ..%!.:'.).k.:.'<..4.,. ., .v...\i..\... ;-.AA_..i'.'i.:)i, 4.'e , , - ,) 1-- \Ls.i\):-i:,. :,-',,-%-c.t ?,--',-*-N:,'-,;‘.,.•.'.i„-",.,_ 4__,t,,‘i,w:4A4.4*iR.t"Oi.ak-.-t-.,i. k,0,--.-.-.-:-,j- ,,,./_4--_..'-_-0. .o...ms,kri_,riit • Course t.' . , \ , . , J - _ -7 \�� if2\:::::0:\ 1 • . ;-\f, - - ,'i o bi•\- •,/� . lr I+'-1 / t:'l. Ei® 4, '.kF\ ,'t0,.. .-.,,J•-..- • •,_.._.,./•..,.‘.,:;\,..7\.'1..-i\I i. -i.V,.4. ..,,,7V .-....... 1 I r,. -.0,- :-.-.i..l-.4._141 5.+..L-5'.- .:..rZ 7 1 1:, i`p'1. .. ��®�\ - ,`•�\;ram_ _ r,'.:. !• :'�,' ., \� '�1 4 !` p "_. 11 \ d `:• ; �� t3 r , Enllnpton Golf Curse '-' �■ • Fj1'1® 4 ' 4 7,, .?\ . -) , s. • t om, - ! - IF - I .Ulk..;; V :_:, • i ,. _ 0 wilap-:� `, .,\i s*+�I s�� '+ ,�. I NORTI H � y ;1.;.:j `_V /-Ihiik" Us ''S W ,..---,,:47\1 1 L.',\\-. - *'-_- . . '...;:.--'n. :._\‘',f,'":'"!..i'V,404,1-1 -- AV,i .. j 4.'6•-• . 1' '\' fik \ F '. . -..-' ;'"';C44',,,* .,-)1*,--, - . Int if-ns..---zS,'%,'Ai: . %17/'..74', T '±1 -AN r: , 1, .I _..ersl tl ar�:.t�y�s:o »*t ;` :04;_: ,a - -_ _ •• 1 ,-, it 11 1lActi, 1-T, •• ' 11:, .��t7d�Sit_\`�;`fI,".LrA,�I,,.�•. y �,Y / I` fir ,..�: f. r 1 1 t :.are,,::•— •/ y iii :?..:5 ^ ': ,. >��'s 1• a�, r� lawn �` -r 7,-,,�sl 777—x 7.17 „�q,-�7.,; 1\Nir 1 . 1 . =J1 r `k. ', '.- . 74 i . I.\-: �' ( Z ( }•r�1 :: -•'its r..,i,- ' :i:'!! ; ''` i 4l':I_."'� • ... .; 1."?...1.1. ..:1 I \! tivi if i. 1 I . ;V i -`,.,. l• I. 1 l''''':-:.'?",-.-ei e '!--; . ' r ;;;=.7.,;:t.... -----/ I - if .,....i.i,i,i;,..4.-il..t.',,:,-t-:.'1,-.._ I •Ik o \-. :.; f. " i''' •' ( I �+ BL.0 (`� I L 40 261 ski -25 ,, 113 AREA UNDISTURBED AND UNDETAINED WETLANDS = 0.47 ACRES BRUSH AND GRASS = 0.67 ACRES • AREA EX-4 • 8502 SQUARE FEET 0.20 ACRES <YZ:01 NTT ors — .�' • gap \ nvuuti a i r•ar VI i iuiEA:ac�i: ::::::: ::: Mom :::'•'•••• ".....',....:::::::::::::::::::::::::..\ \\\ • • ` Boa •.$::::::::"Al* \ S i \ . ..:::::::::::::::S\ \\,...\\\\,. \ \ TOTAL EXISTING CONDITIONS \ DRAINAGE BASIN = 18.07 ACRES N AREA EX-5g. 15630 SQUARE FEET $q0.36 ACRES . S9 \\ iAREA EX-2 - \ 11.20 SQUARE FEET *Ake*:\ 11.20 ACRES 441 1 k\ \\ \\ • 2896 SQUARE FEET 0.07 ACRES 3327 SOU%RE FEET ��� 0.08 ACRES \tom`' Io39 w.Ns rcn 1 , 842 SQUARE F 0.02 ACRES N. EXISTING CONDITIONS'`"- `\ SCALE 1"=200 1 it I - SOILS REPORT ��I III. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS OFF-SITE ANALYSIS The storm water exits the site through an existing 12 inch culvert and enters an' existing Class III Wetland at the extreme north end of the property. Storm water passes through the wetland, then through a 24 inch diameter steel pipe that passes under the railroad right-of-way and empties into the Duamish River. This point is about 300 feet downstream from the subject property. The Duamish flow is northerly and westerly from this point to Elliott Bay. For at least 1,000 feet downstream from the 24 inch outfall the river banks appear to be stable, either in their natural condition or with rip rap protection. No evidence of erosion, siltation, or bank sloughing was evident at the time of the site visit. There was no physical indication of lack of capacity of the Duamish River. The Black River Waste Reduction Center Draft E.I.S., Pam. 3.3.1.3 FLOODING states that the wetland at the north end of the site is hydrologically connected to the Duamish River and would be subject to flooding during a 100 year event for. the river. The paragraph further states that the property is located in a zone "C" according to Panel numbers 326D and 328D and is in an area of minimal flooding and is not considered to be in the 100 year floodplain. The site consists of 17.6± acres and at a point one-quarter mile downstream the site the site is less than 0.1% of the total drainage basin which includes the Green River drainage basin. AREA SUMMARY EXISTING CONDITIONS BASIN AREA SCS SOILS HYD SOILS AREA CN AREA CN TC FILE NAME ACRES CLASS. GROUP PERVIOUS PERVIOUS IMPERV. IMPERV. NAME • EX-1 2.26 BEAUSITE C 2.26 81 0 -- 18.7 See Note EX-2 11.2 URBAN D 11.15 91 0.05 98 14.7 See Note i EX-3 0.75 URBAN D 0.75 91 0 -- 5 See Note EX-4 0.20 PAVING -- 0 -- 0.20 98 5 See Note EX-5 0.36 PAVING -- 0 -- 0.36 98 5 See Note` EX-6 1.76 BEAUSITE C 1.76 81 0 -- 5 See Note • P2/3=0.67 P2=2.0 P10=2.9 P100=3.95 NOTE:All file names will incorporate basin names with a.002,.010 or.100 extension for a 2,10 or 100 year rainfall respectively. An extension of.333 is used for the P2/3 Rainfall. Ssa 1 Ned 1\ -T N. 1 .L zYdSN 1 kQ •N L'`7I = -117 '0-1- E.-'VI �111,4 121 0 V 09 x9'9 o LI Sd. D'S =A .SO'O= S LZ = ?1 • • • • _O50'01- LZ = n 017 '4 = SU S9t•S�= Z �NIW ,0cc =91'0) Sig CZ)O Z _ `bl g/o oClxobrIQ) Zt�'o -I-- �Z-'X�� 7JO11-. 7�.L1`1� 1`tQ7 J4 3 kW. çNJ.IczNoJ vfv11_SIXa) NIW L' 81 = g• 4 + �'LI = of 8Z s•adc' S =A 102.2. =1 ��O'Q� LZ =/\ 3� LZ =>I NNN A A A N�+ N r O O N O O O ��OCS9I,o) IQ(Z) mmn+ $' VI COI (Q L I X Rb'0)2 i7' c'4Vic)�Z = 2S $'occ)S)s0(z d> d � it 0(-1 SU)Zfi'o -x-a) N ol_12crzi_LN'aD'NC?0 S1'NI.1- ry O l.LIcLNc �. ��N 1..LSI�C -,(D 2-17(1-9cn-2.F.Q-Qb- ;1. l 1 r� \ It\ AREA UNDISTURBED AND UNDETAINED WETLANDS = 0.47 ACRES Nrrki 1\ BRUSH AND GRASS = 0.67 ACRES • \\\T‘i AREA EX-4 \ ` 8502 SQUARE FEET \ \�`` 0.20 ACRES \ \ 1.. ....-.:;---..Z.:"...... '— it\ I \\ �riL\ '•:'`�� f'.'. `\ \\. %1/\\\ owr¢no.mawu o w an\ i1,• \..,� • \i a mrxs rorasa nit co-art X c •. �" nw«oc ama uiaur llii kX : ;'� :_- • :: \�:\ \ ark \ 1.\ \\ \\It \ \ .....v.. „ .„;671.... „,:...:.::.:::::: ..:,\,\\y\o„, s., ...c.4.0 .1 \ ‘‘ .\ \ .... \, \v,k, \?\0,&._11...,, ..>,...s,, ,\ Tait \ , li.____,,:,- ..,-. . • \\ \tilk, \ -=_-_-- . N\SA ' ----;-t*,t. ''\.\\ i 1\ \\ \ -----1\f, ,,. \ . A t;,, , \x \ - 1,0 ‘\\ \‘,\\\ ♦ L<344���,1t* ',y TOTAL EXISTING CONDMONS \ 141..At,,, V\ �,1 DRAINAGE BASIN :807 ACRES �\\\\\\ \\ 69\----NI',I \\,• ,a\\\36 ACRES \\ \\\ 1 U E\ET !�\V11`� \ \201T, \ �,1'i�1\ \ \ \ L�yy,s� . \:,'4, \ \\ \\\\ \\ 1Pgilit \\\ , \\ AN\ \\\\ \\\ ,k' _____-----.1 \‘‘, \ \ \\\ \A\ NA • \ \28\SQUARE E \\\\�`\ , \ \\ ` 0.67ACRES\\ `• • \\\�\`� `` . \ \ 4s N \\ \\ \ ‘'Vk ‘,.% \\\ \\ \ , q\ \33 7 . l.y , IV* \ \\ \\:.\\ r I \ �\ E s`' ``\` \ \ . \., \ \ ‘,., \ ,.,1‘,., 1 • \ ,,, \'`.\\‘'\\ . . , . , , ,, ‘ z„ _. _ , \\ \\ �\\\\ gyp ��`,\g 8 V - . \ v.X EXISTING CONDITIONS � .' ��� `R A`SCALE 1"=200 RMAEX-1.333 • III . • KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGR AMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) ******************** • S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** .67" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV), A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 2.3 2.3 81.0 .0 98.0 18.7 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .01 23.83 . 129 ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP RMAEX-1.002 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) ,• DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) . ***************************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.00' TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ►' • ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: • AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 2.3 2.3 81.0 .0 98.0 18.7 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .19 7.83 4944 ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP RMAEX-1.010 • KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS • Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS • Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 • 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA • 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: • 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** • ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.90' TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: • • AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS. TC(MINUTES)• A CN A CN 2.3 2.3 81.0 .0 98.0 18.7 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .51 7.83 10122 ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP • RMAEX-1.100 • KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-1A ', - 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 = STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.95m TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 2.3 2.3 81.0 .0 98.0 18.7 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .96 7.83 16992 ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED -HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP RMAEX-2.333 • KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) r ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** .67" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) , A CN A CN 11.2 11.1 91.0 .1 98.0 14.7 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .19 7.83 6252 • ENTER Ed:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP RMAEX-2.002 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC '1 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.00' TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 11.2 11.1 91.0 .1 98.0 14.7 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 2.97 7.83 47317 ENTER Ed:] [path]filename[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP RMAEX-2.010 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.90° TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 11.2 11.1 91.0 .1 98.0 14.7 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) S 5.26 7.83 80394 ENTER Ed:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP li RMAEX-2.100 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) r ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.95" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) , . A CN A CN 11.2 11.1 91.0 .1 98.0 14.7 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 8.00 7.83 120644 ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP it it RMAEX-3.333 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division I ' HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD. 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM. OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** .67" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT:' AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) S A CN A CN .8 .8 91.0 .0 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .02 7.83 415 ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? • RMAEX-3.002 i KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .8 .8 91.0 .0 98.0 5.0 • PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .23 7.67 3167 ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: ' FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? RMAEX-3.010 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 • 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 _ RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) • ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** • ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.90" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* • ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN . .8 .8 91.0 .0 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .42 7.67 5385 ENTER (d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? • RMAEX-3.100 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW - 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: • 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.95" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* j a - ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV), A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS .TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .8 .8 91.0 .0 98.0 5.0 . PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .64 7.67 8084 ENTER Ed:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? RMAEX-4.333 I • KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division • HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION • ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** .67" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: - AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 .0 .0 .2 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .03 7.67 344 • ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP RMAEX-4.002 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* f • ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 .0 .0 .2 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) ..VOL(CU-FT) , .10 7.67 1288 ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP RMAEX-4.010 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.90• TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 .0 .0 .2 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .15 7.67 1937 ENTER [d:] [path]filename[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP YI • RMAEX-4.100 • KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division • HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 . 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD • 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC • 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: • 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM • 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.95" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 • DATA PRINT-OUT: • • • AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS . TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 .0 .0 .2 98.0 5.0 • PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .21 7.67 2697 ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT; S - STOP ill RMAEX-5.333 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version' 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) ` ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** .67" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .4 .0 .0 .4 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .0.S 7.67 620 ENTER Ed:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP RMAEX-5.002 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .4 .0 .0 .4 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .18 7.67 2318 ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP I ' • RMAEX-5.010 I ' KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.90" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN('IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .4 .0 .0 .4 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .27 7.67 3487 ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP RMAEX-5.100 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.95u TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV), A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .4 .0 .0 .4 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .37 7.67 4855 ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP • II RMAEX-6.333 I ' KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ' ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** .67" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) ' A CN A CN 1.8 1.8 81.0 .0 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .00 23.83 101 ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP RMAEX-6.002 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) ' ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES)_ • A CN A CN 1.8 1.8 81.0 .0 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .20 7.83 3862 ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP RMAEX-6.010 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** f ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.95" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A . CN 1.8 1.8 81.0 .0 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .53 7.83 8146 ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP RMAEX-6.100 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division • HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH S STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) • ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.95" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 1.8 1.8 ' 81.0 .0 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .94 7.67 13285 ENTER [d:] [path]filename[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP HYDEXADD.333 II KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: ROUTINE FOR ADDING HYDROGRAPHS ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[ .ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 1 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 1 ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[ .ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 2 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 2 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH 1: PEAK-Q= .01 CFS T-PEAK= 23.00 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 2: PEAK-Q= .19 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES • HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= .19 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TOTAL VOLUME: 6288CU-FT SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 3 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 3 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH S: PFAK-Q= .19 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 3: PEAK-Q= .03 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= .22 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TOTAL VOLUME: 6912CU-FT SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 4 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 4 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH S: PEAK-Q= .22 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 4: PEAK-Q= .03 CFS T-PEAK= 7.67 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= .25. CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TOTAL VOLUME: 7158CU-FT SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 5 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 5 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH S: PEAK-Q= .25 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 5: PEAK-Q= .05 CFS T-PEAK= 7.67 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= .30 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TOTAL VOLUME: 7950CU-FT SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 6 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 6 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH S: PEAK-Q= .30 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 6: PEAK-Q= .00 CFS T-PEAK= .00 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= .30 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TOTAL VOLUME: •7950CU-FT ; ' SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP • ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? I ' SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP HYDEXADD.002 • KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE • 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: ROUTINE FOR ADDING HYDROGRAPHS ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 1 • ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 1 ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 2 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 2 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH 1: PEAK-Q= .19 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 2: PEAK-Q= 2.97 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= 3.16 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TOTAL VOLUME: 52200CU-FT SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 3 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 3 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH S: PEAK-Q= 3.16 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT- 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 3: PEAK-Q= .36 CFS T-PEAK= 7.67 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES . HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= 3.51 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TOTAL VOLUME: 57132CU-FT SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 4 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 4 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH S: PEAK-Q 3.51 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 4: PEAK-Q= .10 CFS T-PEAK= 7.67 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= 3.60 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TOTAL VOLUME: 58410CU-FT SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 5 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 5 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH S: PEAK-Q= 3.60 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 5: PEAK-Q= .18 CFS T-PEAK= 7.67 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= 3.77 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TOTAL VOLUME: 60780CU-FT SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 6 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 6 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH S: PEAK-Q= 3.77 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 6: PEAK-Q= .20 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= 3.97 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TOTAL VOLUME: 64626CU-FT SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP f ' HYDEXADD.010 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: ROUTINE FOR ADDING HYDROGRAPHS ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 1 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 1 - ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[ .ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 2 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 2 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH 1: PEAK-Q= .51 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 2: PEAK-Q= 5.26 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= 5.77 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TOTAL VOLUME: 90522CU-FT SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE,, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE,. P - PRINT, S - STOP ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 3 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 3 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH S: PEAK-Q= 5.77 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 3: PEAK-Q= .64 CFS T-PEAK= 7.67 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= 6.38 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TOTAL VOLUME: 98670CU-FT SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[ .ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 4 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 4 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH S: PEAK-Q= 6.38 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 4: PEAK-Q= .15 CFS T-PEAK= 7.67 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= 6.52 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TOTAL VOLUME: 100554CU-FT SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 5 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 5 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH S: PEAK-Q= 6.52 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 5: PEAK-Q= .27 CFS T-PEAK= 7.67 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= 6.77 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TOTAL VOLUME: 104196CU-FT SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext) OF HYDROGRAPH 6 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 6 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH S: PEAK-Q= 6.77 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 6: PEAK-Q= .53 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= 7.30 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS • TOTAL VOLUME: 112326CU-FT SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP • ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP • HYDEXADD.100 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: ROUTINE FOR ADDING HYDROGRAPHS ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 1 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 1 ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 2 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 2 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH 1: PEAK-Q= .96 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 2: PEAK-Q= 8.00 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= 8.96 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TOTAL VOLUME: 137640CU-FT SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 3 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 3 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH S: PEAK-Q= 8.96 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 3: PEAK-Q= .98 CFS T-PEAK= 7.67 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= 9.88 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TOTAL VOLUME: 149964CU-FT SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[ .ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 4 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 4 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH S: PEAK-Q= 9.88 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 4: PEAK-Q= .21 CFS T-PEAK= 7.67 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= 10.07 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TOTAL VOLUME: 152622CU-FT SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 5 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 5 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH S: PEAK-Q= - 10.07 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 5: PEAK-Q= .37 CFS T-PEAK= 7.67 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= 10.41 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TOTAL VOLUME: 157368CU-FT SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 6 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 6 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH S: PEAK-Q= 10.41 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 6: PEAK-Q= .94 CFS T-PEAK= 7.67 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= 11.34 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TOTAL VOLUME: 170640CU-FT SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP SCS RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH USING KING COUNTY "HYD" PROGRAM CLIENT NAME: REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY PROJECT NAME: BLACK RIVER CDL W.O.#: COMPUTER FILE NAME: EXISTHYD DATE: MAY 7, 1992 TITLE: BLACK RIVER WASTE REDUCTION FACILITY 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR PEAK= 3.97 PEAK= 7.3 PEAK= 11.34 STEP= 10 STEP= 10 STEP= 10 No. STEPS= 159 No. STEPS= 159 No. STEPS= 158 Z£'0 £8'Z 60'0 £8'Z £0'0 £8'Z PZ'0 L9'Z POD L9'Z • ZO'O L9'Z L l'0 : 9'Z £0'0 9'Z ZO'0 9'Z el.'0 ££'Z £0'0 ££'Z ZO'O ££'Z 60'0 . L L'Z COD L L'Z ZOD L L'Z 90'0 Z COD Z L 0'0 Z 90'0 £8'L . £0'0 £8'L L O'0 £8'I. COD L9'L ZOD L9'L L 0'0 L9'L £0'0 9'L ZO'0 9'L 0 9'L £0'0 ££'I. ZOD ££'L 0 ££'I. £0'0 L L'L L0'0 L L'L 0 L L'L . • ZO'0 I. LO'0 I. . 0 I. ZO'0 £8'0 • 0 £8'0 0 £8'0 L 0'0 L9'0 0 L9'0 0 L9'0 0 9'0 0 9'0 0 9'0 0 ££'O 0 ££'0 0 ££'0 0 LL 0 0 Li'0 0 LL'0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.03 3 0.12 3 0.39 3.17 0.03 3.17 0.16 3.17 0.44 3.33 0.03 3.33 0.2 . 3.33 0.51 3.5 0.04 3.5 0.23 3.5 0.56 3.67 0.05 3.67 0.29 3.67 0.66 3.83 0.08 3.83 0.35 3.83 0.75 4 0.1 4 0.39 4 0.82 4.17 0.12 4.17 0.44 4.17 0.9 4.33 0.14 4.33 0.48 4.33 0.96 4.5 0.16 4.5 0.52 4.5 1.04 4.67 0.21 4.67 .0.58 4.67 1.16 4.83 0.26 4.83 0.67 4.83 1.31 5 0.3 5 0.72 5 1.42 5.17 0.33 5.17 0.79 5.17 1.49 5.33 0.35 5.33 0.84 5.33 1.57 5.5 0.38 5.5 0.89 5.5 1.64 5.67 0.42 5.67 0.98 5.67 1.77 5.83 0.48 5.83 1.09 5.83 1.94 6 0.52 6 1.18 6 2.06 6.17 0.55 6.17 1.22 6.17 2.14 6.33 0.58 6.33 1.29 6.33 2.21 6.5 0.61 6.5 1.35 6.5 2.28 6.67 0.75 . 6.67 1.55 6.67 2.64 6.83 0.89 6.83 1.84 6.83 3.09 7 0.98 7 2.01 7 3.34 7.17 1.18 7.17 2.36 7.17 3.86 7.33 1.42 7.33 2.79 7.33 .4.52 7.5 2.04 7.5 3.92 7.5 6.25 7.67 - 3.49 7.67 6.54 7.67 10.28 7.83 3.97 7.83 7.3 7.83 11.34 8 3.12 8 5.68 8 8.75 8.17 2.46 8.17 4.38 8.17 6.7 8.33 2.03 8.33 3.59 8.33 5.48 8.5 1.85 8.5 . 3.27 8.5 4.95 8.67 1.62 8.67 2.82 8.67 4.25 8.83 1.34 8.83 . 2.33 8.83 3.53 9 1.26 9 2.15 9 3.25 9.17 1.21 9.17 2.07 9.17 3.11 9.33 1.19 9.33 2.03 9.33 3.04 9.5 1.18 9.5 2.02 9.5 3.02 9.67 1.18 9.67 2.01 9.67 3.02 9.83 1.18 9.83 2.02 9.83 3.02 • • 80'Z cm' £V'L E£'£L 98'0 EE'EL 80'Z L1'EL VV'L LL'£l 98'0 LL'£L ZL'Z El 9V'l EL 88'0 £L Z'Z £8'ZL Z9'L , £8'ZL 6'0 E8'ZL V'Z L9'3 l V9'L L9'Z L L O'L L9'Z L 99'3 9*Z1 9L'1 9'ZL 90'1 9'31 V9'3 £E'ZL 9L'L ££'ZL 90'1 EE'ZL 179'Z L1'ZL 9L'L L1'Zl 90'1 LL'ZL V9'Z Z L 9L'L Z l 90'1 Z L E9'Z £8'L L 9L'l £8'L L 90'L £8'L l £9'Z L9'L l VL'I L9'11 90'1 L9'1 1 £9'Z 9'11 VC 1 9'11 90'1 9'11 VS'Z ££'l L VL'L ££'L L 90'1 ££'L L 99'Z LULL ZL'L LULL 90'L L1'll 69'Z L L 9L'L L l 90'1 l L L9'Z £8'0L 8'1 £8'01 60'l £8'0L 6'Z L9'0 L 96'L L9'0 L 9 L'L L9'0 L 90'E 5'OL 90'Z 9'01 ZZ'l 9'01 90'£ ££'OL 90'Z EE'O. ZZ'l EE'OL are LI'Oi VO'Z L1'01 LZ'1 LVOL ZO'E 01 £0'Z 01 61'1 01 LT I. £8'9 L I.'I. • £8'9 L 69'0 £8'9l - ZL'L L9'9 L --Z'L L9'91 PL'0 L9'9 1 88'1 9'91 8Z'I. 9'91 6L'0 9'9l £8'L • ££'91. , 8Z'l ££'9 L . 6L'0 ££'9 L £8'L . L l'9l LZ'I. - L L'91 8(0 L 1.'91 Z8'L 91 LZ'L 91 8(0 91 L81. £8'9 L • LZ'L £8'9 L 8(0 £8'91 L 8'L L9'9 l LZ'l L9'9 L • 8L'0 L9'9 l Z8'L 9'9l LZ'L 9'91 - 8(0 9'91 Z8'L Mgt • 8Z'L ££'9 L . 8(0 ££'91. £8'1 Ll'91. 9Z'L LL'9l 8L'0 Ll'91 98'1. Si 6Z'1 91 6L'0 91 88'1. £8'PL L£'L £8'17l - L8'0 £81/1. Z L9'bl 8£'1. L9'1P1. P8'0 L9'17l L0'Z 9'bl 8P'1. 911 98'0 •911 L0'Z . ££'bl W L MP' 98'0 MN. 90'Z Ll'171 Z17'1 - Ll'bl 98'0 LL'PI 90'Z - PL Z1'L PI 98'0 PI 90'Z £8'£l ZP'L £8'£l 98'0 £8'81 90'Z L9'£1. Zttl L9'£L 98'0 L9'£l 90'Z 9'£L . Z1'1 9'£L 98'0 9'£l 17 0.67 17 1.06 17 1.51 17.17 0.65 17.17 1.05 17.17 1.49 17.33 0.65 17.33 1.03 17.33 ' 1.48 17.5 0.65 17.5 1.03 17.5 1.46 17.67 0.65 1.7.67 1.02 17.67 - 1.46 17.83 0.65 17.83 1.02 .. 17.83 1.46 18 0.65 18 1.02 18 1.46 18.17 0.65 18.17 1.02 18.17 1.46 18.33 0.65 18.33 1.03 . 18.33 1.47 18.5 0.65 18.5 1.03 18.5 1.47 18.67 0.65 18.67 1.03 18.67 1.47 18.83 0.65 18.83 1.03 18.83 1,47 19 0.65 19 1.03 19 1.47 19.17 0.65 19.17 1.03 19.17 1.47 19.33 0.65 19.33 1.03 19.33 1.47 19.5 0.65 19.5 1.03 19.5 1.47 19.67 0.65 19.67 1.03 19.67 1.48 19.83 0.65 19.83 1.03 19.83 1.49 20 0.65 20 1.04 20 1.49 20.17 0.65 20.17 1.04 20.17 1.49 20.33 0.66 20.33 1.04 20.33 1.49 20.5 0.66 20.5 1.04 20.5 1.49 20.67 0.67 20.67 1.04 20.67 ' 1.49 20.83 0.67 20.83 1.04 20.83 1.49 21 0.67 21 1.04 21 1.49 21.17 0.67 21.17 1.04 21.17 1.49 21.33 0.67 21.33 1.04 21.33 1.49 21.5 0.67 21.5 1.04 21.5 1.49 21.67 0.67 21.67 1.04 21.67 1.49 21.83 0.67 21.83 1.04 21.83 1.49 22 0.67 22 1.04 22 1.49 22.17 ' 0.67 22.17 1.05 22.17 1.49 22.33 0.67 22.33 1.05 22.33 1.49 22.5 0.67 22.5 1.05 22.5 1.49 22.67 0.67 22.67 1.05 22.67 1.49 22.83 0.67 22.83 1.05 , 22.83 1.49 23 0.67 23 1.06 23 1.49 23.17 0.67 23.17 1.06 23.17 1.49 23.33 0.67 23.33 1.06 23.33 1.5 23.5 0.67 23.5 1.06 23.5 1.5 23.67 0.67 23.67 1.06 23.67 1.5 23.83 0.67 23.83 1.06 23.83 1.5 0 ££'9Z 0 ££'9Z o LL'9Z 0 LL'9Z 0 LL'9Z 0 9Z 0 • 9Z • 0 9Z 0 £8'93 0 E8'93 0 £8'9Z 0 L9'9Z 0 L9'9Z 0 L9*9Z 0 9'9Z 0 9'9Z 0 9'9Z 0 ££'9Z 0 ££'SZ 0 ££'9Z 0 L L'9Z 0 L L'9Z 0 L L'9Z 0 • 9Z 0 5Z 0 9Z 0 £817Z 0 £8'n 0 £8'PZ 0 L9'PZ 0 L9'IZ 0 L9'17Z 0 9'PZ 0 9'bZ 0 9'PZ 0 ££'17Z £0'0 ££'bZ ZO'0 ££'17Z 917'0 LL'17Z Z£'0 LL'bZ Z'0 LL'PZ 90'I. PZ PLO PZ WO PZ AREA SUMMARY DEVELOPED CONDITIONS BASIN AREA SCS SOILS HYD SOILS AREA CN AREA CN TC FILE NAME ACRES CLASS. GROUP PERVIOUS PERVIOUS IMPERV. IMPERV. NAME DEV-1 7.39 BEAUSITE C 7.09 86 0.20 98 12.1 See Note DEV-2 8.40 URBAN D )4 IL 90 6.79 98 9.3 See Note DEV-3 1.16 URBAN D 1.16 90 0 -- 5 See Note • P2=2.0 P10=2.9 P100=3.95 NOTE: File names will incorporate basin names with a.002,.010 and.100 extension for a 2,10 or 100 year rainfall respectively. t / • i ' 1 W S n 0I sainN�S„1 S tyd1i1. 1 . sss 1 /.,yt-t -�-1I M Qb:�zL%4 47,4 z /\ c NO 1.s.-D.M jc I .k47 • ' tv1W ,:z 'S = o9Xi 'z coo L '-^l . 010'0 �S Sd'=1 I'Z = �10�0 1Z =n tZt 1 .10�0 =s -A _^ ozoq) _% -Iv.c)ctzp.o ) .5,(3(.'0 e o X 110'O Zij�O = *IL • Z"'AB( ) hi01 I dl?1,1.1�1��t�i0� q ► 4I i • NlW i ' Z1 _ DI_ N11.•� 9x 1 � � 00Z 002 010'0 - s 01 '0 _al\, >1 ----A 4 100 NNI , - AN,. . N I e •b,110 So) 9, 3 (2) 004 C _ 41 lm0o"rh cm N,V WO 017'O =SU q.z'O = °s70-772--/---17,0 ' 3-1-- o s/ so\ Zdi : (r-- lid.) NoL.L. a1 1a,�� cEad0"l aAa. '1d.0 21.2AQI ->,-e-ig -f7o_9p0 -Z€O-Qb-IZ yVy- ..*`� AREA UNDISTURBED & UNDETAINED WETLANDS = 0.47 ACRES BRUSH & GRASS = 0.67 ACRES •sk.+` 8502 SQUARE FEET e� 0.20 ACRES unn iawtin ui iwvuo' LLD r•sr IF,Li • , \. \I. ,,.. \\ ' 4 \0\'.,\..\...%\14- :\`\,. '\\ AREA DEV-1 \\ 321908 SQUARE FEET 7.39 ACRES ' \ \\ 15630 SQUARE FEET \••• ® 0.36 ACRES 70012 SQUARE FEET 1.61 ACRES L\\IkSil: • • \\\ .. I AREA DEV-3 AR:11110-2% . \ \\\\‘..3 ...,i' \ . 67954 SQUARE FEET 280037 SQUARE FEET 1.16 ACRES 6.43 AC ES r V • . . A� DEVELOPED CONDITIONS w�d SCALE 1"=200' —- I RMADEV-1.002 • KING COUULIC WO • NTY Water Management PDivisionRKS HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS • • Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE • 4 - ROUTE2 • 5 - ADDHYD • 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS • ENTER OPTION: • SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: • 1 S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: • S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM ******************** **** 2.00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: • • AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) • A CN A CN r 7.1 6.9 86.0 .2 98.0 12.1 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) • 1.31 7.83 22489 ENTER Ed:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM P • - PRINT, S - •STOP i t RMADEV-1.010 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 • 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION • ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.90* TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS. : TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 7.1 6.9 86.0 .2 98.0 12.1 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 2.66 - 7.83 41329 ENTER (d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP RMADEV-1.100 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** • ********* 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.95" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN • 7.1 6.9 86.0 .2 .98.0 12.1 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 4.38 7.83 65173 ENTER Ed:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP RMADEV-2.002 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS • • Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) • ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ' - ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 8.4 1.6 90.0 6.8 98.0 9.3 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 3.54 7.83 50107 ENTER Ed:) [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP I ' RMADEV-2.010 • KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 • 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA . 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.90" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* P ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) . PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 8.4 1.6 90.0 6.8 98.0 . 9.3 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 5.39 7.83 76808 ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP 1 RMADEV-2.100 III • KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) * ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ***************************** 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.95" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 8.4 1.6 90.0 6.8 98.0 9.3 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 7.56 7.83 108315 ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP RMADEV-3.002 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 .- RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** • ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 1.2 1.2 90.0 .0 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .33 7.67 4606 ENTER (d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP RMADEV-3.010 • KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION • ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.90" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 1.2 1.2 90.0 .0 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .61 7.67 7968 ENTER Ed:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP II RMADEV-3.100 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS • Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) I ' ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.95" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* • ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 1.2 1.2 90.0 .0 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .95 7.67 12092 ENTER Ed:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP • I • HYDADDEV.002 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 -3 - ROUTE E 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: ROUTINE FOR ADDING HYDROGRAPHS ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 1 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 1 ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 2 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 2 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH 1: PEAK-Q= 1.31 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 2: PEAK-Q= 3.54 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES r, HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= 4.85 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS • I . TOTAL VOLUME: 72582CU-FT SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 3 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 3 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH S: PEAK-Q= 4.85 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MI NUTES HYDROGRAPH 3: PEAK-Q= .33 CFS T-PEAK= 7 .67 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= 5.17 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TOTAL VOLUME: 77286CU-FT SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: HYDADDEV.010 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: ROUTINE FOR ADDING HYDROGRAPHS ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 1 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 1 ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 2 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 2 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH 1: PEAK-Q= 2.66 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 2: PEAK-Q= 5.39 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES • 6 HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= 8.05 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TOTAL VOLUME: 118140CU-FT SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 3 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 3 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH S: PEAK-Q= 8.05 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 3: PEAK-Q= .61 CFS T-PEAK= 7.67 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= 8.63 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TOTAL VOLUME: 126006CU-FT SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: HYDADDEV.100 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: ROUTINE FOR ADDING HYDROGRAPHS ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 1 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 1 ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 2 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 2 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH 1: PEAK-Q= 4.38 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES ' HYDROGRAPH 2: PEAK-Q= 7.56 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= 11.94 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TOTAL VOLUME: 173472CU-FT SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP ENTER: [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 3 ENTER: TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) OF HYDROGRAPH 3 DATA PRINT-OUT: HYDROGRAPH S: PEAK-Q= 11.94 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH 3: PEAK-Q= .95 CFS T-PEAK= 7.67 HRS TT= 0 MINUTES HYDROGRAPH SUM: PEAK-Q= 12.84 CFS T-PEAK= 7.83 HRS TOTAL VOLUME: 185442CU-FT SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, P - PRINT, S - STOP ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: BLACK RIVER CDL DEVELOPED CONDITION HYDROGRAPHS 15 A z 0 W 10 - c W w w t U 5 - UJ1 Is 0 - 0 5 10 15 20 25 TIME HOURS 2-YEAR RETURN STORM 10-YEAR RETURN STORM � 100-YEAR RETURN STORM SCS RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH USING KING COUNTY "HYD" PROGRAM CLIENT NAME: REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY PROJECT NAME: BLACK RIVER CDL W.O.#: COMPUTER FILE NAME: DEVHYD DATE: MAY 6, 1992 TITLE: BLACK RIVER WASTE REDUCTION FACILITY 2 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR PEAK= 5.17 PEAK= 8.63 PEAK= 12.84 STEP= 10 STEP= 10 STEP= 10 No. STEPS= 155 . 'No. STEPS= 155 No. STEPS= 155 Z8'0 £8'Z 9'0 £8'Z 8Z'O £8'Z ZL'O L9'Z WO L9'Z 9Z'0 L9'Z 99'0 9'Z b'0 9'Z ZZ'0 9'Z L9'0 ££'Z 8£'0 ££'Z Z'0 ££'Z 89'0 LL'Z 9£'O Ll'Z LL'O LL'Z 99'0 Z ££'0 Z 9 L'0 Z 9'0 £8'L 6Z'O £8'l £l'0 £8'L Zt'0 L9'l PZ'O L9'l l'0 L9'L 9£'0 9'l Z'0 9'1 L0'0 9'l Z£'0 ££'L 9L'0 ££'L 90'0 ££'l 8Z'O Ll'L £l'0 Ll'l t70'0 LL'1 £Z'0 I. 60'0 l ZO'0 L 9l'0 £8'0 90'0 £8'0 0 £8'0 . 60'0 L9'0 ZO'0 L9'0 0 L9'0 £0'0 9'0 0 9'0 0 9'0 0 ££'0 0 ££'0 0 ££'0 0 LLD 0 Ll'0 0 LLD 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z9'Z ££'9 89'L EE'9 �E6'0 9£'9 99'Z L L'9 P9'L L L'9 L6'0 L 1'9 Z97 9 9'L 9 L8'0 9 en E8'9 £9'L £9'9 V8'0 £8'9 £Z'Z L9'9 V'I. L9'9 9L'0 L9'9 90'Z 9'9 6Z'L 9'9 69'0 9'9 ZO'Z EE'9 VZ'L £9'9 99'0 E£'9 96'L LL'9 LZ'L LL'9 V9'0 LL'9 L6'1. 9 LL'L 9 L9'0 9 Z8'L £81, L'L £817 69'0 £8'V V9'L L917 66'0 L9'V Z9'0 L911 L9'l 9'V 6'0 917 8V'0 9'V 9P'L ££'V 99'0 ££'V LP'0 eel?, W L L L'V E8'0 L L'V 9V'0 L L'V 9E'L V 6L'0 V £V'0 V LZ'L £8'£ VL'0 WC LV'0 E8'£ E L'L L9'E L9'0 L9'£ L£'0 L9'E ZO'L 9'£ L9'0 9'E V£'0 9'£ L6'0 ££'E 69'0 ££'£ E£'0 E£'£ Z6'0 L l'E L9'0 L L'E Z£'0 L L'£ 88'0 E £9'0 £ CD E L L'£ E8'6 E 'Z £8'6 A E£'I £8'6 L'£ L9'6 £l'Z L9'6 ££'l L9'6 60'£ 9'6 £L'Z 9'6 . L£'L 9'6 60'£ ££'6 £L'Z ££'b l£'L E£'6 Z l'E • L L'6 V L'Z L 1'6 Z£'L L 1'6 Z'£ 0 6 Z'Z 6 V£'L 6 PVC £8'8 9E'Z £8'8 W L £8'8 8 L'V L9'8 987 L9'8 PC I. L9'8 98'V 9'8 L£'£ 9'8 ZO'Z 9'8 6Z'9 E£'8 9'£ £E'8 8l7 E£'8 V9'9 L 1.'8 6V17 L 113 L CZ L L'8 £Z'6 8 VZ'9 8 VL'£ 8 V871. £8'L E9'8 E8'L LL'9 £8'L 96'L L L9'L L0'8 L9'L LL'V L9'L ZZ'L 0 9'L 8'P 9'L Z8'Z 9'L 61.'9 ££'L ZV'E ££'L 66'L EE'L LV'V LL'L £6'Z LL'L 69'1 Ll'L 88'E L ES'Z L •9V'L L 99'£ £8'9 KZ £8'9 V£'I. £8'9 L'E L9'9 Z L9'9 V L'l L9'9 L9'Z 9'9 L L'L 9'9 L6'0 9'9 10 1.35 10 2.16 10 3.11 10.17 1.35 10.17 2.17 10.17 3.12 10.33 1.36 10.33 2.17 10.33 . 3.13 10.5 1.36 10.5 2.18 10.5 3.14 10.67 1.28 10.67 2.04 10.67 2.95 10.83 1.17 10.83 1.87 10.83 2.71 11 1.14 11 1.82 11 2.63 11.17 1.13 11.17 1.81 11.17 2.6 11.33 1.13 11.33 1.8 11.33 2.6 11.5 1,13 11.5 1.81 11.5 2.6 11.67 1.14 11.67 1.81 _ 11.67 2.6 11.83 1.14 11.83 1.81 11.83 2.6 _ 12 1.16 12 1.81 12 2.6 12.17 1.16 12.17 1.82 12.17 2.61 12.33 1.16 . 12.33 1.82 12.33 2.61 12.5 1.16 12.5 1.82 12.5 2.61 12.67 1.08 . 12.67 1.7 12.67 2.43 12.83 0.97 12.83 1.54 12.83 2.2 13 0.94 13 1.48 13 2.12 13.17 0.93 13.17 . 1.47 . 13.17 2.1 13.33 0.93 13.33 1.46 13.33 2.08 13.5 0.93 13.5 1.46 13.5 2.08 13.67 0.93 13.67 1.46 13.67 2.08 13.83 0.93 13.83 1.46 13.83 2.08 14 0.94 14 1,46 14 2.09 14.17 0.94 14.17 1.47 14.17 2.09 14.33 0.94 14.33 1.47 14.33 2.09 14.5 0.94 14.5 1.47 14.5 2.1 14.67 0.91 14.67 1.41 14.67 2.01 14.83 0.85 14.83 1.33 14.83 1.9 15 0.85 15 1.31 15 1.86 15.17 0.84 15.17 1.31 15.17 1.86 15.33 0.83 15.33 1.31 15.33 1.86 15.5 0.84 15.5 1.31 15.5 1.86 15.67 0.84 15.67 1.31 15.67 1.86 15.83 0.84 15.83 1.31 15.83 1.86 16 0.84 16 1.31 16 1.86 16.17 0.84 16.17 1.31 1.6.17 1.86 16.33 0.84. 16.33 1.31 16.33 1.86 16.5 0.84 16.5 1.31 16.5 1.86 16.67 0.78 16.67 1.22 16.67 1.74 16.83 0.72_ 16.83 1.1 16.83 1.57 17 0.69 17 1.07 17 1.51 17.17 0.69 17.17 1.06 17.17 1,49 17.33 0.68 17.33 1.05 17.33 1.49 17.5 0.68 17.5 1.05 17.5 1.49 17.67 0.68 17.67 1.05 17.67 : 1.49 17.83 0.68 17.83 1.05 17.83 1.49 18 0.69 18 1.05 18 1.49 18.17 0.69 18.17 1.05 18.17 1.49 18.33 0.69 18.33 1.05 18.33 1.49 18.5 0.69 18.5 1.05 18.5 1.49 18.67 0.69 18.67 1.05 18.67 1.49 18.83 0.69 18.83 1.05 18.83 1.49 19 0.69 19 1.05 19 1.49 19.17 0.69 19.17 1.06 19.17 1.49 19.33 0.69 19.33 1.06 19.33 1.49 19.5 0.69 19.5 1.06 19.5 1.49 19.67 0.69 19.67 1.06 19.67 1.49 19.83 0.69 19.83 1.06 19.83 1.49 20 0.69 20 1.06 20 '1.49 20.17 0.69 20.17 1.06 20.17 1.49 20.33 0.69 .,. ,,. 20.33 1.06 20.33 1.49 • 9'L E8'EZ LO'L E8'£Z CO E8'£Z 9'L L9'EZ L0'L L9'£Z L'0. 49'EZ 9'L 9'£Z L0'L 9'£Z CO 9'£Z 9'L £E'£Z LO'L £E'£Z CO ££'£Z 9'L LL'£Z LO'L LL'CZ L'0 LL'£Z 9'L £Z LO'L £Z CO EZ 9'L £8'ZZ LO'L £8'ZZ • CO £8'ZZ 9'L L9'ZZ L0'L L9'ZZ CO L9'ZZ 9'L 9'ZZ L0'L 9'ZZ CO 9'ZZ 9'L E£'ZZ L0'l ££'ZZ CO ££'ZZ 9'L LL'ZZ L0'L LL'ZZ CO LL'ZZ 9'L ZZ LO'L ZZ CO ZZ 9'L £8'I.Z CO'L E8'L Z CO £8'L Z 9'l L9'L Z LO'L L9'L Z CO L9'L Z 9'L 9'L Z L0'L 9'I.Z . CO 9'L Z 9'L ££'L Z L0'L ££'L Z CO ££'L Z 9'1 LL'LZ L0'L LL'LZ 69'0 LL'LZ 9'l LZ L0'L LZ 69'0 lZ 9'L £8'OZ L0'L £8'OZ 69'0 £8'OZ 9'l L9'0Z L0'L L9'0Z 69'0 L9'0Z 9'L 9'0Z L0'L 9'0Z 69'0 9'0Z , 0 L9'9Z 0 L9'9Z 0 L9'9Z 0 9'9Z 0 9'9Z 0 9'9Z 0 EE'SZ 0 E£'SZ 0 ££'9Z 0 L1'93 0 LL'9Z 0 LL'9Z 0 9Z 0 9Z 0 9Z 0 £817Z 0 Urn 0 £8'1Z 0 L9'tiZ 0 L9'17Z 0 L917Z 0 5'PZ 0 9'PZ 0 517Z 0 ££'PZ 0 E£'VZ 0 ££'t7Z b£'0 L L'TZ EZ'0 L lTZ 9•l'0 L L'17Z l PZ ZL'0 17Z 9Y0 bZ i S�'lA 2(-qb-T32- -04- 113LAC1C 21V 1Z. cn L•._ /S/ �Z- / WETP1\1D - 1\11N lM U M 51 ( Q , O3O cr-s) WATER SUIzFAcE — M 1P11MUM OF: 170 OF THE imPelzvIOU5 SU2FAc15 OF sI't6, �/ot_UM - MIt-4IMUVI OF TOTAL... VOLUM1 OF U14OF1 T=1Zc i ot\iF -T1-11g. OF -11-1E. ul1.4 F Z YEAH Z4 1-1()LA FPia.EGI P t TQT 10 N • W W W W W W S2S N N N 0 O O e" WAT"aTZ SU2FFcE MINIMUM = 3104S SF Na aaa CI N N MINIMUNI P01.t-0 VOLUME. _ 7 FT di beingImu M -p01.JD P i+-1 = 3 VT +- I f t€ ST02. U3a. 3 CELLS -- 15T CALL 10±-- /o t EsK N wivreTZ SUTz�A« — Z -9 C t t-L 4S± "r esi 9N `N A-T2 5 UP-F A c 1'1111\11.Nl U M ZO C--TzOP'l kN Y tom'- 3P a-g T Y L T hl G. , • - CDLPOND KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: R/D FACILITY DESIGN ROUTINE SPECIFY TYPE OF R/D FACILITY: 1 - POND 4 - INFILTRATION POND 2 - TANK 5 - INFILTRATION TANK 3 - VAULT 6 - GRAVEL TRENCH/BED ENTER: POND SIDE SLOPE (HORIZ. COMPONENT) ENTER: EFFECTIVE STORAGE DEPTH(ft) BEFORE OVERFLOW ENTER [d:] [path]filename[ .ext] OF PRIMARY DESIGN INFLOW HYDROGRAPH: PRIMARY DESIGN INFLOW PEAK = 8.63 CFS ENTER PRIMARY DESIGN RELEASE RATE(cfs) : ENTER NUMBER OF INFLOW HYDROGRAPHS TO BE TESTED FOR PERFORMANCE (5 MAXIMUM) : ; • ENTER [d:] [path]filename[ .ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 1: ENTER TARGET RELEASE RATE(cfs) : ENTER [d:] [path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 2: ENTER TARGET RELEASE RATE(cfs) : ENTER: NUMBER OF ORIFICES, RISER-HEAD(ft) , RISER-DIAMETER(in) RISER OVERFLOW DEPTH FOR PRIMARY PEAK INFLOW = .5.8 FT SPECIFY ITERATION DISPLAY: Y - YES, N - NO SPECIFY: R - REVIEW/REVISE INPUT, C - CONTINUE INITIAL STORAGE VALUE••FOR ITERATION PURPOSES: 36639 CU-FT BOTTOM ORIFICE: ENTER Q-MAX(cfs) DIA.= 6.69 INCHES MIDDLE ORIFICE: ENTER Q-MAX(cfs) , HEIGHT(ft) DIA.= 9.11 INCHES TOP ORIFICE: ENTER HEIGHT(ft) DIA.= 9.03 INCHES II . I ITERATION COMPUTATION BEGINS. . . TRIAL BOTTOM-AREA STOR-AVAIL STOR-USED PK-STAGE PK-OUTFLOW 1 10178.8 36639 22165 1.93 3.73 ' 2 ' 7986.5 29402 19611 2.12 4.12 3 6519.3 24506 17375 2.25 4.80 4 5461.4 20941 15436 2.33 5.27 5 4652.6 •18188 13845 2.40 5.66 6 4020.5 16017 12609 2.47 5.88 7 3529.0 ' 14313 11580 2.53 6.06 8 3138.1 12946 10725 2.59 6.22 9 2823.1 11836 10050 2.64 - 6.38 10 2571.6 10943 9484 2.69 -6.52 11 2367.7 10214 9006 2.73 6.62 12 2200.0 9610 8578 2.75 6.69 13 2057.5 9094 8204 2.78 6.74 14 1935.3 8649 7875 2.80 6.79 15 1829.5 8262 7583 2.82 6.84 16 1737.2 7922 7327 2.83 6.88 17 1656.6 7624 7100 2.85 6.92 18 1585.9 7362 6898 2.86 6.95 19 1523.6 7130 6717 2.87 6.98 20 1468.3 6923 6554 2.88 7.01 21 1419.1 6738 6407 2.89 7.03 22 1375.1 6573 6274 2.90 7.05 23 1335.5 6423 6153 2.91 7.07 24 1299.8 6288 6042 2.92 7.09 25 1267.5 6165 5942 2.92 7.10 26 1238.1 6053 5849 2.93 7.12 27 1211.4 5951 5764 2.93 7.13 28 1187.0 5858 5687 2.94 7.14 29 1164.7 5772 5615 2.94 7.15 30 1144.2 5693 5548 2.95 7.16 31 1125.3 5621 5487 2.95 7 .17 32 1108.0 5554 5430 2.95 7.18 33 1091.9 5492 5377 2.96 7.19 34 1077.1 5435 5328 2.96 7.20 35 1063.4 5381 5283 2.96 7.20 ' 36 1050.7 5332 5240 2.96 7.21 . 37 1038.9 5286 5201 2.97 7.21 r` 38 1027.9 5243. 5164 2.97 7.22 39 1017.6 5204 5129 2.97 7.22 40 1008.1 5166 5097 2.97 7.23 41 999.2 5132 5067 2.97 7.23 42 990.9 5099 5038 2.97 7.24 43 983.1 5069 5012 2.98. . 7.24 44 975.9 5040 4987 2.98 7.24 45 969.0 5014 4964 2.98 7.25 . 46 962.7 4989 4942 2.98 7.25 47 956.7 4965 4921 2.98 7.25 48 951.1 4943 4902 2.98 7.26 49 945.8 4922 4883 2.98 7.26 50 940.8 4903 4866 2.98 7.26 51 936.2 4884 4850 2.99 7.26 52 931.8 4867 48.35 2.99 7.27 53 927.7 4851 4821 2.99 7.27 54 923.8 4836 4808 2.99 7.27 55 920.3 4822 4796 2.99 7.27 56 917.0 4809 4785 2.99 7.27 57 913.9 4797 4775 2.99 7.28 58 911.1 4786 4765 2.99 . 7.28 ' 59 908.5 4775 4756 2.99 7.28 60 906.1 4766 4748 2.99 7.28 61 903.9 4757 4741 2.99 7.28 1 62 901.8 4749 4733 2.99 7.28 63 899.8 4741 4727 2.99 7.28 64 898.0 4734 4721 2.99 7.29 65 896.4 4727 4715 2.99 7.29 1 66 894.8 4721 4710 2.99 7.29 67 893.4 4716 4705 3.00 7.29 68 892.1 4710 4701 3.00 7.29 69 890.8 4705 4696 3.00 7.29 70 889.7 4701 4692 3.00 7.29 71 888.6 4697 4689 3.00 7.29 72 887.6 4693 4685 3.00 7.29 73 886.7 4689 4682 3.00 7.29 74 885.8 4686 4679 3.00 7.29 75 885.0 4682 4676 3.00 •7.29 76 884.3 4679 4674 3.00 7.29 77 883.6 4677 4672 3.00 7.29 1 78 882.9 4674 4669 3.00 7.29 79 882.3 4672 4667 3.00 7.30 . PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET-OUTFLOW ACTUAL-OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE DESIGN HYD: 8.63 7.30 7.30 3.00 4667 TEST HYD 1: 5.17 3.97 4.43 2.18 2940 TEST HYD 2: 12.84 11.34 12.84 3.39 5730 SPECIFY: D - DOCUMENT, R - REVISE, A - ADJUST ORIF, E - ENLARGE, S - STOP ENLARGEMENT OPTION: ALLOWS FOR INCREASING STORAGE AT A SPECIFIED STAGE HEIGHT, TO PROVIDE A FACTOR OF SAFETY. ENTER: STORAGE-INCREASE(%) , STAGE-HEIGHT(ft) PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET-OUTFLOW ACTUAL-OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE ,� DESIGN HYD: 8.63 7.30 7.12 2.93 5866 Ic TEST HYD 1: 5.17 3.97 4.18 2.13 3780 LIZ TEST HYD 2: 12.84 11.34 12.84 3.39 7330 tool'Z SPECIFY: D - DOCUMENT, R - REVISE, A - ADJUST ORIF, E - ENLARGE, S - STOP PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET-OUTFLOW ACTUAL-OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE • DESIGN HYD: 8.63 7.30 7.12 2.93 5866. • TEST HYD 1: 5.17 3.97 4.18 2.13 3780; TEST HYD 2: 12.84 11.34 12.84 3.39 7330 , STRUCTURE DATA: R/D-POND (3.0:1 SIDE SLOPES) " .- RISER-HEAD POND-BOTTOM-AREA TOP-AREA(81'F.B.) STOR-DEPTH STORAGE-VOLUME 3.00 FT 1243.4 SQ-FT 3614.7 SQ-FT 3.00 FT 6073 CU-FT r TRIPLE ORIFICE RESTRICTOR: DIA(INCHES) HT(FEET) Q-MAX(CFS) BOTTOM ORIFICE: 6.69 .00 2.100 MIDDLE ORIFICE: 9.11 1.10 3.100 TOP ORIFICE: 9.03 2.10 2.100 Lr ` ROUTING DATA: • STAGE(FT) DISCHARGE(CFS) STORAGE(CU-FT) PERM-AREA(SQ-FT) .00 .00 .0 .0 .30 .66 393.5 .0 .60 .94 829.4 .0 .90 1.15 1309.6 .0 1.10 1.27 1655.3 .0 1.20 2.04 1836.0 .0 1.50 2.91 2410.5 .0 1.80 3.51 3035.2 .0 2.10 4.01 3711.9 .0 2.10 4.01 3711.9 .0 2.40 5.65 4442.7 .0 2.70 6.55 5229.3 .0 3.00 7.30 6073.9 .0 3.10 8.14 6368.6 .0 3.20 9.49 6670.1 .0 3.30 11.16 6978.3 .0 3.40 13.10 7293.4 .0 3.50 15.26 7615.4 .0 AVERAGE VERTICAL PERMEABILITY: .0 MINUTES/INCH SPECIFY: F - FILE, N - NEWJOB, P - PRINT IF/OF, R - REVISE, S - STOP ENTER [d:] [path]filename[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF ROUTING DATA: SPECIFY: F - FILE, N - NEWJOB, P - PRINT IF/OF, R - REVISE, S - STOP . 1 i (-27 ZS , o -17 � 178'ZI f� ( \'7' ) - (3'h2' / 0'à) ^ div N N N N N N AAA ANC N-. £ 'NW • HRH I x° mmr=n .N ,z40 • AV N c n 21 AO ;NON S J2.1 I a Z,S '1� Zl A l >t��1II/ l I to-9cA-zoo Ob-,? dW?i V. CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN • PROS: BLACK RIVER CDL PIPE SIZING TABLE REID MIDDLETON,INC. WO: 21-90-32-6-4 (Runoff by Rational Method) 19031 33RD AVENUE W.,STE 301 FILE: BRCDLREV (Pipe Capacity byManning'sEgn.) LYNNWOOD,WA 98036 DATE CREATED: MAY 13,1992 (Las update:2f2090) LAST REVISION: MAY 13,1992 204775-3434 Storm: 25 YEAR,24 HOUR TOTAL RAINFALL IN INCHES: 3.4 COEFFICIENTS FOR"1"EQUATION: as 2.66 b' 0.65 Location Time of Rain Pipe % Veloc Flow inc, Runoff Sum Concen. Intens Runoff n Dlam Slope Length Capac Capac Full Time Remarks CAPACITY VELOC From To Area Coef, A•C A•C (min.) (Inllr) (cfs) Value (In.) (%) (ft) (cfs) Used (ft/see) (min) CHECK CHECK 10 9 0.23 0.90 021 0.21 630 2.73 057 0.012 12 0500, 140.0 2.73 21 3.48 0.67 9 4 0.31 0.90 028 0,49 6.97 256 124 0.012 12 2.900 145.0 657 19 837 029 4 3 027 0.90 0.24 0.73 726 2.49 1.82 0.012 12 3.460 431.0 7.18 25 9.14 0.79 0.00 0.73 8.05 233 1.70 11 12 3.45 0.25 0.86 0.86 732 2.48 2.14 0.012 12 0.500 50.0 2.73 78 3.48 024 0.00 0.86 756 2.43 2.09 2 3 1.74 032 056 0.56 932 2.12 1.18 0.012 12 0.500 65.0 2.73 43 3.48 031 0.00 0.56 9.63 2.07 1.16 1 3 0.16 0.62 0.10 0.10 630 273 027 0.012 12 0300 200.0 2.73 10 3,48 0.96 3 5 1.01 0.90 0.91 2.73 9.63 2.07 5.66 0.012 18 0.500 300.0 8.05 70 455 1.10 ADD FLOW FROM CB'S 1,2,4,9,10 5 6 032 0.88 028 3.01 10.73 1.93 5.83 0.012 18 0.900 150.0 10.80 54 6.11 0.41 6 7 0.47 0.84 039 3.41 11.14 1.89 6.43 0.012 21 1.620 130.0 21.85 29 9.08 0.24 7 8 030 0.82 0.41 3.82 1138 1.86 7.11 0.012 21 1.540 - 130.0 2130 33 8.86 0.24 8 12 0.94 0.90 0.85 4.66 11.62 1.84 8.56 0.012 21 1.600 150.0 21.71 39 9.03 028 12 13 1.72 0.73 126 6.78 11.90 1.81 12.26 0.012 33 0500 150.0 4051 30 6.82 037 ADD PLOW FROM CB it 11 13 14 029 0.90 026 7.04 12.26 1.77 12A8 0.012 33 0.500 135.0 4051 31 6.82 , 033 14 15 0.43 0.90 039 7.43 1259 1.74 12.95 0.012 33 0.500 140.0 4051 32 6.82 034 15 WETPON 0.19 0.90 0.17 7.60 12.94 131 13.02 0.012 33 0300 100.0 4051 32 6.82 024 MODIFY AS NECESSARY 0.00 7.60 13.18 1.69 12.86 PROJECT: CI L.A L 14: (R l\/1,. , C D 1... PAGE I OF PIPE DATA FILE NAME C D L- 17 1 F)E . ri j ROUND/ARCH PIPE INPUT CODING INFORMATION: PIPE TYPE CODING: 4 - CMP ARCH (OLD GEOMETRY) 1 - CONC/SMOOTH BORE (n=.012) 5%- CMP ARCH (NEW GEOMETRY) 2 - CORRUGATED METAL (n=.024) 6 - CONC/SMOOTH ARCH (OLD) 3 - HELICAL CMP (n-fac varies) 7 - CONC/SMOOTH ARCH (NEW) ARCH PIPE CODING - EQUIVALENT ROUND SIZE MUST BE INPUTTED PER FOLLOWING TABLE: EQUIV-DIAM OLD-ARCH NEW-ARCH * EQUIV-DIAM. OLD-ARCH NEW-ARCH 15" 18"X 11" 17°X 13" * 42° 50"X 31" 49"X 33' 18" 22"X 13' 21"X 13" * 48" 58"X 36' 57"X 38' 21' 25"X 16" 24"X 18" * 54' 65°X 40' 64"X 43" 24" 29"X 18' 28"X 20" * 60° 72"X 44" 71"X 47" 30" 36"X 22" 35"X 24" * 66" 79"X 49" 77"X 52" 36" 43"X 27" 42"X 29" * 72" 85"X 54" 83'X 57° INLET TYPE CODING: 1 - CMP/PROJ. 4 - CP SOCKET/PROJ 7 - CMAP/PROJ 10 - OTHER (SEE 2 - CMP/HDWALL 5 - CP SQ.EDGE/HDWALL 8 - CMAP/HDWALL FHWA REPORT 3 - CMP/MITER 6 - CP SOCKET/HDWALL 9 - CMAP/MITER HDS NO.5) # LENGTH(ft) DIA(in) PIPE-TYPE OUTLET-IE INLET-IE INLET-TYPE I "12 24 ! Zo,2:1- 2012:1 G KE = K = M = C = Y = . OVERFLOW-ELEV BEND-ANGLE(deg) STRUCT.DIA/WIDTH(ft) Q-RATIO 24,zS O G D CD # LENGTH(ft) DIA(in) PIPE-TYPE OUTLET-IE INLET-IE INLET-TYPE 2 ` 70 24 I ZO;3'7 2"1., :;'b S KE = K = M = C = Y = r OVERFLOW-ELEV BEND-ANGLE(deg) STRUCT.DIA/WIDTH(ft) ' Q-RATIO 33 4S. 4, 5 o, oZ # LENGTH(ft) DIA(in) PIPE-TYPE OUTLET-IE INLET-IE INLET-TYPE 3 140 24 I Z1,70 Z2, 10 S : KE = K = M = C = Y = OVERFLOW-ELEV BEND-ANGLE(deg) STRUCT.DIA/WIDTH(ft) Q-RATIO 3I , 6 0 41S o,b� \. PROJECT:PAGE L OF — PIPE DATA FILE NAME C L P I P L , b Y1Y _ # LENGTH(ft) DIA(in) PIPE-TYPE OUTLET-IE INLET-IE INLET-TYPE .4. 1 3 S 24 1 ZZ,s% Zs%i$ . KE = K = M = C = Y = OVERFLOW-ELEV BEND-ANGLE(deg) STRUCT.DIA/WIDTH(ft) Q-RATIO 3013 0 4, S o,o4 # LENGTH.(ft) DIA(in) PIPE-TYPE OUTLET-IE INLET-IE INLET-TYPE 5 I5 0 Z4 1 Z3,28 24,03 S KE = K = M = C = Y = OVERFLOW-ELEV BEND-ANGLE(deg) STRUCT.DIA/WIDTH(ft) Q-RATIO Z8,s0 C 4.5 0,2S # LENGTH(ft) DIA(in) PIPE-TYPE OUTLET-IE INLET-IE INLET-TYPE 6 1S 0 1 1 7-4-•IS zl 11Z KE = K = M = C = Y = OVERFLOW-ELEV BEND-ANGLE(deg) STRUCT.DIA/WIDTH(ft) Q-RATIO 31 , 0 0 4,S 0118 # LENGTH(ft) DIA(in) PIPE-TYPE OUTLET-IE INLET-IE INLET-TYPE 7 130 I c3 1 21,7.3 Z5,18 KE = K = M = C = Y = P OVERFLOW-ELEV BEND-ANGLE(deg) STRUCT.DIA/WIDTH(ft) Q-RATIO ' 32,Z 5 0 4 0, 13 # LENGTH(ft) DIA(in) PIPE-TYPE OUTLET-IE INLET-IE INLET-TYPE 8 130 IS 1 Z5,Z8 30145 s KE = K '= M = C = Y _ r OVERFLOW-ELEV BEND-ANGLE(deg) STRUCT.DIA/WIDTH(ft) Q-RATIO 3416 p 4 o,I4 PROJECT:PAGE 3 OF — — cDL? 1 � C T3�J PIPE DATA FILE NAME # LENGTH(ft) DIA(in) PIPE-TYPE OUTLET-IE INLET-IE INLET-TYPE B I S O . I S I M,S5 31,30 KE = K = M = C = Y = OVERFLOW-ELEV BEND-ANGLE(deg) STRUCT.DIA/WIDTH(ft) Q-RATIO 37.0 10 4 0.11 # LENGTH(ft) DIA(in) PIPE-TYPE OUTLET-IE INLET-IE INLET-TYPE 10 300 I E 1 3I , 4-0 32,S0 5 KE = K = M = C = Y = OVERFLOW-ELEV BEND-ANGLE(deg) STRUCT.DIA/WIDTH(ft) Q-RATIO 4.1 3321 4 ct4Z # LENGTH(ft) DIA(in) PIPE-TYPE OUTLET-IE INLET-IE INLET-TYPE 1 I 43 1 __Z I 33 4:7,a S KE = K = M = C = Y = OVERFLOW-ELEV BEND-ANGLE(deg) STRUCT.DIA/WIDTH(ft) Q-RATIO G2. S4 S Z4- 0,3g # LENGTH(ft) DIA(in) PIPE-TYPE OUTLET-IE INLET-IE INLET-TYPE I Z 14•S 12 1 4 g Sz t z. S KE = K = M = C = Y = OVERFLOW-ELEV BEND-ANGLE(deg) STRUCT.DIA/WIDTH(ft) Q-RATIO . S7, 0 ZS 24 0.74 # LENGTH(ft) DIA(in) PIPE-TYPE OUTLET-IE INLET-IE INLET-TYPE 13 14.0 IZ 1 SZ13 S3 S KE = K = M• = C = Y = , OVERFLOW-ELEV BEND-ANGLE(deg) STRUCT.DIA/WIDTH(ft) Q-RATIO 57,.0 0 Z4 o • • 1 ^c C- xWC>bw KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division BACKWATER ANALYSIS PROGRAM Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - BWCHAN 3 - BWPIPE 4 - BWCULV 5 - BWBOX 6 - DATA-FILE ROUTINES 7 - RETURN TO DOS Er-- t OPTION 3 BACKWATER COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR PIPES SPECIFY TYPE OF PIPE-DATA INPUT: K - KEYBOARD F - FILE f ENTER [d: ] [path]filename[ .ext] OF PIPE-DATA FILE cdlpipe.bw OUTFLOW CONDITIONS PIPE NO. 1 - TAILWATER DATA: 1) SPECIFY TYPE OF TAILWATER DATA INPUT: S - SINGLE TW-ELEV. F - -.TW/HW DATA FILE s 2) ENTER: TW-ELEV 22.25 INFLOW CONDITIONS PIPE NO.13 - OVERFLOW DATA AND UPSTREAM VELOCITY DATA: 1) ENTER: OVERFLOW-ELEV, OVERFLOW-TYPE (NONE=O, BROAD-WEIR=1, SHARP-WEIR=2) 51 e ,- PECIFY TYPE OF VELOCITY DATA INPUT: S - SINGLE VELOCITY UPSTREAM V - VARY VELOCITY ACCORDING TO V=Q/A 5 3)� ENTER: VELOCITY(fps) UPSTREAM 5 Ei t: QMIN, QMAX, QINCRE, PRINT-OPTION (STANDARD=1, CONDENSED=2, EXPANDED=3) 0 2,1 PIPE NO. 1: 12 LF - 24"CP @ .50% OUTLET: 20. 21 INLET: 20.27 INTYP: 5 JUNC NO. 1: OVERFLOW-EL: 24.25 BEND: 0 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 6. 0 Q-RATIO: .00 Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI ******************************************************************************* 2.00 1.99 22.26 * . 012 .50 .46 2 . 04 2.04 1.99 1.99 . 66 4.00 2.00 22.27 * .012 .71 . 66 2 . 04 2. 04 1.99 2.00 .95 6.00 2. 02 22.29 * .012 .87 .82 2. 04 2. 04 1.99 2.02 1. 17 8.00' 2.05 22.32 * . 012 1. 01 .96 2 . 04 2. 04 2. 00 2.05 1.36 10.00 2. 08 22. 35 * .012 1.14 1. 09 2 . 04 2 . 04 2. 00 2.08 1.53 12.00 2. 13 22.40 * . 012 1.25 1.23 2. 04 2 .04 2. 01 2.13 1.69 PIPE NO. 2: 70 LF - 24"CP @ 1.76% OUTLET: 20. 37 INLET: 21.60 INTYP: 5 JUNC NO. 2: OVERFLOW-EL: 33 . 00 BEND: 45 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 4.5 Q-RATIO: .02 Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI ******************************************************************************* 2.00 .76 22 .36 * . 012 .50 .34 1.89 1.89 . 64 .76 .65 4.00 .94 22 . 54 * . 012 .71 .48 1. 90 1.90 .71 ***** .94 6.00 1.18 22 .78 * . 012 .87 .59 1. 92 1.92 .87 ***** 1.18 n ,00 1.39 22.99 * . 012 1. 01 . 68 1. 95 1.95 1. 01 *****. 1.39 00 1.59 23 . 19 * .012 1. 14 .77 1. 98 1. 98 1. 14 ***** 1.59 1J.4.00 1.77 23 .37 * . 012 1.25 . 85 2 . 03 2 .03 1.25 ***** 1.77 PIPE NO. 3: 140 LF - 24"CP @ .50% OUTLET: 21.70 INLET: 22.40 INTYP: 5 JUNC NO. 3: OVERFLOW-EL: 31. 60 BEND: 0 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 4.5 Q-RATIO: .06 Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO ;, HWI k****************************************************************************** 1.96 .65 23 .05 * . 012 .49 .46 . 66 . 66 .49 ***** .65 3.92 .94 23 .34 * .012 .70 .65 . 84 .84 .70 ***** .94 5.88 1.17 23 .57 * .012 .86 .81 1. 08 1. 08 .86 ***** 1.17 7.84 1.36 23 .76 * . 012 1. 00 .95 1. 29 1.29 1.00 ***** 1.36 19.80 1.54 23 .94 * . 012 1. 13 1. 08 1. 49 1.49 1. 13 ***** 1.54 11.76 1.71 24.11 * .012 1.24 1.21 1. 67 1. 67 1.24 ***** 1.71 ?IPE NO. 4: 135 LF - 24"CP @ .50% OUTLET: 22 .50 INLET: 23.18 INTYP: 5 iUNC NO. 4: OVERFLOW-EL: 30.30 BEND: 0 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 4.5 Q-RATIO: .04 Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI F****************************************************************************** 1.85 .63 23 .81 * .012 .48 .45 . 55 .55 .48 ***** .63 3.70 .91 24 .09 * . 012 . 68 . 63 . 84 .84 . 68 ***** .91 5.55 1.13 24.31 * .012 .84 .78 1. 07 1. 07 .84 ***** 1.13 40 1.32 24 .50 * .012 . 97 . 92 1. 26 1.26 .97 ***** 1.32 25 1.49 24 . 67 * .012 1. 09 1. 04 1. 44 1.44 1.09 ***** 1.49 11.10 1.64 24.82 * . 012 1. 20 1. 17 1. 61 1. 61 1.20 ***** 1.64 'IPE NO. 5: 150 LF - 24"CP @ .50% OUTLET: 23 . 28 INLET: 24.03 INTYP: 5 JUNC NO. 5: OVERFLOW-EL: 28.80 BEND: 0 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 4.5 Q-RATIO: .25 FS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI * *************************************************************************** 1.78 .62 24.65 * .012 .47 .44 .53 .53 .47 ***** . 62 3.56 .88 24.91 * .012 .67 . 62 .81 .81 .67 ***** .88 5.34 1.07 25. 10 * .012 .82 .77 1. 03 1.03 .82 ***** 1.07 7.11 1.23 25.26 * . 012 .95 . 90 1. 22 . 1.22 .95 ***** 1.2.3 8.89 1.36 25.39 * .012 1.07 1. 02 1. 39 1.39 1.07 ***** 1.36 10.67 1.48 25.51 * .012 1.18 1. 14 1.54 1.54 1.18 ***** 1.48 PIPE NO. 6: 150 LF - 18"CP @ 2.00% OUTLET: 24 . 13 INLET: 27.13 INTYP: 5 JUNC NO. 6: OVERFLOW-EL: 31.00 BEND: 0 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 4.5 Q-RATIO: .18 Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI ****************************************************************************** 1.42 .59 27.72 * .012 .45 .31 .52 .52 .45 ***** .59 2.85 .87 28.00 * .012 .65 . 43 .78 .78 . 65 ***** .87 4.27 1. 10 28.23 * .012 .80 . 53 .97 .97 .80 ***** 1.10 5.69 1.31 28.44 * .012 .93 . 62 1. 13 1. 13 .93 ***** 1.31 7.11 1.50 28. 63 * .012 1.04 .70 1.26 1.26 1.04 ***** 1.50 8.54 1.70 28 .83 * .012 1. 14 .78 1.38 1.38 1. 14 ***** 1.70 PIPE NO. 7: 130 LF - 18"CP @ 1.50% OUTLET: 27 . 23 INLET: 29.18 INTYP: 5 JUNC NO. 7: OVERFLOW-EL: 32 .25 BEND: 0 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 4.0 Q-RATIO: .13 'S) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW . DO DE HWO HWI *t ,************************************************************************** 1.21 .55 29.73 * .012 .42 . 30 .49 .49 .42 ***** .55 2.41 .79 29.97 * . 012 .59 .43 .77 .77 .59 ***** .79 3.62 1.00 30.18 * .012 .73 .53 1.00 1. 00 .73 ***** 1.00 4.82 1. 17 30.35 * .012 .85 . 61 1.21 1.21 .85 ***** 1.17 6.03 1.34 30.52 * . 012 .95 . 69 1.40 1.40 .95 ***** 1.34 7.24 1.50 30.68 * .012 1.05 . 77 1. 60 1.60 1.05 *****; 1.50 PIPE NO. 8: 130 LF - 18"CP @ .90% OUTLET: 29 .28 INLET: 30.45 INTYP: 5 JUNC NO. 8: OVERFLOW-EL: 34.60 BEND: 0 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 4.0 Q-RATIO: .14 Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI ******************************************************************************* 1.07 . .52 30.97 * .012 .39 .32 .45 .45 .39 ***** .52 2.13 .75 31.20 * .012 .56 . 46 . 69 .69 .56 *****' .75 3.20 .94 31.39 * .012 . 69 .56 .90 .90 . 69 ***** .94 4.27 1. 10 31.55 * .012 .80 . 66 1.07 1. 07 .80 ***** 1. 10 5.34 1.25 31.70 * .012 .90 .75 1. 24 1.24 .90 ***** 1.25 6.40 1.40 31.85 * .012 .98 .84 1.40 1.40 .98 ***** 1.40 PIPE NO. 9: 150 LF - 18"CP @ .50% OUTLET: 30.55 INLET: 31.30 INTYP: 5 . JUNC NO. 9: OVERFLOW-EL: 37.00 BEND: 10 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 4.0 Q-RATIO: . 11 S) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI **x*w************************************************************************** .94 .48 31.78 * . 012 .37 . 35 .42 .42 .37 ***** . .48 1.87 .70 32.00 * .012 .52 . 50 .65 . 65 .52 ***** .70 2.81 .87 32. 17 * .012 . 64 . 62 .84 .84 .64 ***** .87 3.74 1. 02 32.32 * .012 .74 . 72 1. 00 1. 00 .74 ***** 1.02 1 1 4.68 1.16 32.46 * .012 .84 .83 1.15 1. 15 .84 ***** 1.16 5.62 1.38 32 .68 * .012 .92 .93 1.30 1.30 .9.3 1.38 1.29 Part, NO.10: 300 LF - 18"CP @ .50% OUTLET: 31.40 INLET: 32.90 INTYP: 5 JUNC NO.10: OVERFLOW-EL: 41. 00 BEND: 90 DEG DIA/WIDTH: 4.0 Q-RATIO: .42 Q(CFS) .HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC , DN TW DO DE HWO HWI ******************************************************************************* 1 .84 .47 33.37 * .012 .35 .33 .38 .38 .35 ***** .47 11.69 .69 33 .59 * .012 .49 .47 .60 . 60 .49 ***** .69 I 2.53 .89 33.79 * .012 .61 . 58 .77 .77 . 61 ***** .89 3.37 1.09 33.99 * .012 .71 . 68 .92 .92 .71 ***** 1.09 4.22 1.29 34.19 * .012 .79 .78 1. 06 1.06. .79 ***** 1.29 5.06 1.59 34.49 * .012 .87 .87 1.28 1.28 .87 .1.59 1.49 1 PIPE NO.11: 431 LF - 12"CP @ 3.46% OUTLET: 33.00 INLET: 47.90 INTYP: 5 JUNC NO.11: OVERFLOW-EL: 52.50 BEND: 5 DEG DIA/WIDTH:24.0 Q-RATIO: .38 Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI ******************************************************************************* .59 .42 48.32 * .012 .33 . 20 .37 .37 .33 ***** .42 1 1.19 .63 48.53 * .012 .46 . 28 .59 .59 .46 ***** .63 11.78 .81 48.71 * .012 .57 .34 .79 .79 .57 ***** .81 2.38 .99 48.89 * .012 .66 .40 .99 .99 .66 ***** .99 2.97 1.17 49.07 * .012 .74 .45 1. 19 1.19 .74 ***** 1.17 3 .56. 1.40 49.30 * .012 .81 .50 1.49 1.49 .81 ***** 1.40 . PIPE NO.12: 145 LF - 12"CP @ 2.90% OUTLET: 48. 00 INLET: 52.20 INTYP: 5 JUNC NO.12: OVERFLOW-EL: 57.00 BEND: 25 DEG DIA/WIDTH:24.0 Q-RATIO: .74 Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI ******************************************************************************* .43 .36 52 .56 * .012 .28 . 18 . 32 .32 .28 *****. .36 .86 .53 52.73 * .012 .39 . 25 .53 .53 .39 *****k .53 1.29 .69 52.89 * .012 .49 . 31 .71 .71 .49 ***** . .69 1.72 .83 53.03 * .012 .56 .35 .89 .89 .56 ***** .83 2.15 .97 53.17 * .012 .63 .40 1.07 1.07 .63 ***** .97 2.58 1.12 53 .32 * .012 .69 .44 1.30 1.30 . 69 ***** 1.12 I PIPE NO.13: 140 LF - 12"CP @ .50% OUTLET: 52. 30 INLET: 53.00 INTYP: 5 Q(CFS) HW(FT) HW ELEV. * N-FAC DC DN TW DO DE HWO HWI ******************************************************************************* .25 .21 53 .21 * .012 .21 .21 .26 .26 .21 -. 08 -.11 .49 .30 53.30 * .012 .30 .29 .43 .43 .30 ***** .29 .74 .36 53.36 * .012 .36 . 36 .59 .59 .36 . 17 .11 .99 •.42 53.42 * .012 .42 .42 .73 .73 .42 .26 .20 1.24 .48 53.48 * .012 .47 .48 .87 .87 .48 .35 .28 1.48 .59 53.59 * .012 .52 .53 1.02 1.02 .59 .42 .36 l S IFY: R - REVISE, N - NEWJOB, F - FILE, S - STOP f SPECIFY [d: ] [path]filename[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF HW-DATA AT INLET OF PIPE NO. 13: ^C VI. SPECIAL REPORTS • AND STUDIES VII. BASIN AND COMMUNITY PLANNING AREAS VIII. OTHER PERMITS. IX. EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN X. BOND QUANTITIES WORKSHEET, RETENTION/ DETENTION FACILITY SUMMARY SHEET AND SKETCH KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WA-TER DESIGN MANUAL RETENTION/DETENTION SUMMARY SHEET Development nate Location ENGINEER DEVELOPER Name Name Firm Firm Address Address Phone Phone • Developed Site acres Number of Lots O • Number of Detention Facilities On Site I • Detention provided in regional facility Regional Facility location • No detention required Acceptable receiving waters • Downstream Drainage Basins Immediate Major Basin Basin A 1:),uq- 1544 ( 2rs.EW 121 V&"� Basin B Basin C Basin D • • TOTAL INDIVIDUAL BASIN Drainage Basin(s) A B C D Onsite AreaCD I t Offsite Area WEI1lu'D Type of Storage Facility Live Storage Volume 7950 Predeveloped Runoff Rate 2 year 3.5-7 10year 7.3D S Postdeveloped Runoff Rate 100 year I I i 34 2year 5 )7 10 year 8 G3 Developed Q 100 year I Z' 8 4 Type of Restriction 61 .1 F t GC Size of Orifice/Restriction Orifice/Restriction No_1 -1.03 If No.2 G.(,7 " No.3 0) 21 'H No.4 No.5 • _ ... 1 - • • 1 . •. • - • • UNITED STATES • MOINES QUADRANGLE') • 1 N WASHINGT PARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR O —KING CO: i SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC GEOLOGICAL SURVEY • i 1 , •o y 912: • R.4 E. R.5 E nry • SEATTLUCITY P.O.)10 Mi. le 1,,j 1..1-•,\wit,ril..Le .,___, .. A :•-maprig:--1.:,..„::,vvii.,;;1..- j..- ‘- !,;:.Eig.tuati Iy--1 -111-,74,•'.;'•szr, • Fiyz,11,2.1. Tan • • N,i.:44,,,•i rid__ _, \ . *• 1,;•Ali . ., 4,,„Bre .........-,s... ,,,twirme__,,,•, -., .-....v, -,- . %.01,.. -. rt ' .. L. IC' IS1111162.1141 • i • . .-pg,91, • . / . • , Lk f4 I qii• ' I-• 41. , Vlikliirlitliall11111 ; \il • , 10•1,:_i' ,_,,,- i; . i ‘..NN11.4 L,P. —\i• ailmonliti I ):1 r,,,,...! ., _ . -•,_.,m_,\,_,____ ,ii,.,Avvi-7--;-4;;),.-'—r-1 ifw•l• .itx. •: ' IL.147111N:Millailm6L'e‘\ I' • sIIII-21:-.711.. : _III' ...‘ . ••\1.L:. ilibit v"I 1 , .k. ' ,,--NAI ii \* .ril • hid-- 11 /...r fatra 14.L.,,; pr _,,,, G c,\. .\\,• . ____.-_-_-_-_____, , I 7\TirbrIV,'-/. • 1„Ili,' li:;•- . :--c-,:..- - -Tiv -wt•il kl'4V „s. .• -;,, ,.• Toil 1';-*.TAmi pi --11,1, •. \)\,ksit\\\t,k)illiir...\7:\. .L_ r_i_:. :,.- • ,- 00.,. ,..q.,..501., \,,,i„ ,, ::.. .. ., R•ORT ',-1-1-3'1 'ewage, I \ ,--ttt,&% •• 1... \\A46177111111 \•1;:...1'. •AfifitiS4kV4)1414.4Fjei . . \. ; ....... % flisposa. • . • 'ili\ 1 ,f.1,....‘ 1......-. . :::1-14 ' 1 .,) •..\ 1 .:•961-: .' -27--\-111-1-0-0- 464,AZ SAI ••••I A Vik,101_\..•- I 11 • \irc-f;_it'i r ,./ ..it\'N .b.' • 41k,__ ..A.r .t._,.. / 1St%2r_. \ '-unu - . V.:. Al • ., ,.. 0• • / /-, \N': i • ,Lt------k.,_._-:---z-s-_-_kz --.-1 ...m.Cielk-1. 3114 . 7-Y--Pi ' ,. . ---0 • N 1141/4, .. .• . /,,.. ...„:,:o.„.N......, t1 \..,,- \- '. ,_-.:-J--..,•-•..,........-- .-. .„ ,... ••• _,.-•.. .t*___ '4ALit --mar,m-a-a• 24.lomm: '''I NS .:.::...!,..•,,. .... ,,'•: -._., ":„...._.....=;* .___-_,....r_. -•••••• -1-- _-,-71. 43. ' .,...- .•-."1 NI-%).m fliirk\ illINIM1.11101 I 1/4./.• . Niti‘ . ‘' 54tL*6°. Iltt ifigtWnk 1 .. . ‘.". 1 -_. *iikA • ° I. --N- ‘'.' \ •& p >A . ,.. , --64*,\. : --- ---v(if)-r.riliel 1 I . , , • Foster.. *.-\,r.„.,\, \ ; ,, '•-•,........4?!. ..aptio.:wedi:•-L _• -:,-,.1 . . • , Course N. •\\ \ ,-- I; ..41 ... i \ 4:111,4143 .'. ‘.1,, ):('Ak Ar5........a.....;••••.'. .4744,k\-NT ,,A, 7.7,11,,,,,,,,,,logliiil NIN . .C1• '-\N 2‘ ' ;\•.-' :-: \ . . • .\\ih'-..‘ir41/71‘.-*-44-'1..latWi.f4/106./'(. litgbili#P .. Rmula.4,3 .,44,.. ) •_,,,,... ,,,a=0.1,.,,,..„.v \\.....c:: v_,,,_,_ 0..„..11. 1..,....,..r . N-7,....4.9.4n ... !, ,'Vl .s:-r:s.•---------: .,- '. ,i ' ‘ 1,."-S--. -$•-•4r-li5e-1W!!!..:- N:!-:. - ' - / \\ \\ - • e,-;1A ' n •R.- \ \ • i i --, ` .4.:,6-r-,....,. ti• ', \ -----J.L.,•1 \\ .. \::-----.-"V:ttial . ....L1-WI .--: .71"...'••• 1 '. A • 1! MA 111 I 2\11111e• -.. • ,.---x •-• ‘...1,- i . -.3. ..,;:.4 - } ., - ' . ----.-- ,., : . • ;; ' _.' _0 Pi. , B '-.4Nti : Entilnion Golf 1:Fursel - ---- • a Illk :_.• ÷.......--........-. =7= i -— I- ll • / • ,.:,. . N:‘ \... ; ,,,, _ _\4_ • .1 .,) 13 f,.!•-•,;-.T.O.:* I i /lk I VA;Vtlf)4 .„,.1"...4iiii-1- n -__I le 5 •- ••1•••• it •: t I -- •-• -r---.--I- !••••e_I- I. 1 . .tictr&-Av;i:::':, . % iv:1................„..; l':',1[6A‘.y.: \:, , \ctp f, .) \,, ____ _- ••...: I I i• , ... DI . ..1 A - •111.01,4. i 3. .....°,. i• RV ; - -71 -4-140' • • ...‘•71- '• __J 11111.7fri\ ; ' iii-°'" .. -, I .:.. ....9 , -----40*--alia - . dia:-.)-- Es,... .. / •1 ‘.••1 , ,:'..,\ ',1 . •LI&v.,;\ II, s. ' jialow-r-'.--- ,-- -;---,--t.' ,.--T-7: t - ri ,,ift II, , , 1 ..--41-4. -•,. ..\•.,,,, ‘ 14-":40.. 00-10-- ir---4;4‘, . .'";,---_-,,_ igl I itzrof,N; 1 • 1 , - • I 1 . --• . . W. .\-stii. ..,, .. I .%\ ., V A I NI I '7-r figtit%1 It s'ft.•:.1 T midig-- VAI . -1_, !‘"\.1 s _ __i__,.. 1 --•."-\---411,1--1T-IN-17'• .' • ).....\: . 11111Filit)rOr-..-- Pr• f— : iii 1 V 1 en....L.--21'' ;'... ••• •-i,D s * ' v kiwi ill 1 i• NLiltkt.„Viwe,c1*".• -.)1#041K-, ' • " , 11/ ‘. t, • 1.,,,7 ,. __,..... -..,,,....... ...,N,A6411.,1,,,,v, \.,,,,,.. i 1 ,I,_ l'aft . ,,, •.. 4:- , • 1 Ark 4%.‘ t---'-'-' 51-441) ?. 1- I 17. lat . ti 77-q.,...rile4ir ri .. ' 1.-7. .. :• . ......, yr \ . '4 :1 Fwd.-, • ...te,;,,,p.3..421%-„LaL itre • -- •\,\, -- I . 1 i ..i- II 1 :1 •agiltart 11. 11" il!i5,'k• `..--- ' -- -• ' I •,. .: -• -t. ,-• , 1 • : •• . /1,. 1- : :' % •\ Marl 1 hieril . ' ,, li 1,.Ilk ;i . . Ir'Tr i 1.,:......... ...,w51 . .. 4 , - .., 't • :,nittio, " ' \11111. l';'*;:iZ;11 ! -0,1*-7::.1 • s' 1 i - - }A la" .z.:-.....•, -------- — 7T-4-ii F• •4174.7 777:\\N - : ..!..,.) . : 4 .,.r 1r IL.: -• ----•-•* 1 liSgiip-7,44 ,1i :...:.;i.l.i:. Zir \\ .,N• h . . I.. 14.. Eimat . , ... \-- . I ::';1,4; • 1g 4 . ,:•iA 1: • g;.4..1:1;,..x.k.,..7. !:, . , 4-• ,..ieipik..14- ..ti,4; lh '17,1'. •;... i \ . ) I, ,r 1 ----' I N-, , . '? ,, Ai:. • .:-,..j-..i-i-.. ,„.' " • • . . -„ ..: i..: - )''' -'' 0 • , , 1 -N. 1 i ..-..1.'5A--14.-N- 5.,...::'.:' -iiaNar'‘'4'. 1 • '' • • I 1..,.- ___ /- ',,..1•. : • .; I, • - , • ,..%;.:-.:iiiii.l.:w I *. - .•'.. 14 .1, . ,•,',,i .: .-- f. :,.,„.....,,,. -:, al,.=,=.--m.-.-. • ' g ',H fi ..;14- 14 '1,.=ii•I•l • y 1 § .r. 2q .:;,...0. j I i, ,/ i 14;.. il li il , ....‘ kip 26liki : .1 i .: 25 / ,C5' I: amours t - i i All i 1 -•:0 . • .g. . ,11:, 1- I; '.! • 30 • l : )-. . Iie.5', e ."' \ \ /..: . !• % I 3. , ___--- • I. • \•,,,. . . I ij • - \ )... ..z- . . ... , • i ',VI\. kz:: I• - • • 'p . • • ,...1: t•_________L____ __ ____ ____I _ A • -,, •• r to , .1 - Page 7 of 2 • 1 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT(TIR) WORKSHEET PART; PROJECT OWNER AND .PART 2 PROJECT LOCATION ; : PROJECT ENGINEER _m - AND DESCRIPTION ` Project Owner pry Name 131-AC1C IZ 1 Vgi GD l_ Address Location Phone Township 2 3 Project Engineer Range 4" Section 1 4. Company Project Size I T I ± AC Address Phone Upstream Drainage Basin Size AC PART 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION PART 4 OTHER PERMITS . - ' . . ' ' fl Subdivision El DOF/G HPA O Shoreline Management • ' El Short Subdivision 0 COE 404 El Rockery El Grading 0 DOE Dam Safety 0 Structural Vaults t Commercial El FEMA Floodplain El Other fl Other El COE Wetlands 0 HPA PART 5 ,SITE.COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN •, • ~= Community . (. ) Drainage Basin -DU AM1SA--i 21 V PART 6,;SITE CHARACTERISTICS, • ' I—I River 0 Floodplain • El Stream 154 Wetlands 0 Critical Stream Reach CI Seeps/Springs 0 Depressions/Swales 0 High Groundwater Table 0 Lake fl Groundwater Recharge O Steep Slopes El Other El Lakeside/Erosion Hazard , PART7.SOILS i3tA U Soil voee I/oSlo+pe 17 �/Q Erosion Potential Erosive Velocities u12� � Z ye, ±/ O Additional Sheets Attatched 1/90 Page 2'of_2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET RT 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT Ch.4-Downstream Analysis 1..,1 C 0 El 0 0 Q Additional Sheets Attatched PART 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS - . : . MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION 1V1 Sedimentation Facilities ® Stabilize Exposed Surface Stabilized Construction Entrance 12 Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities is] Perimeter Runoff Control 1L1' Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris El Clearing and Grading Restrictions L Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities El Cover Practices 0 Flag Limits of NGPES Construction Sequence El Other Other ART 10 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM ' 0 Grass Lined Channel 0 Tank O Infiltration Method of Analysis 11 Pipe System 0 Vault El Depression KING C 1 1-IY.0 Q Open Channel O Energy Dissapator Q Flow Dispersal Compensation/Mitigation • 0 Dry Pond 0 Wetland O Waiver of Eliminated Site Storage 12 Wet Pond Q Stream 0 Regional Detention Brief Description of System Operation Facility Related Site Limitations El Additional Sheets Attatched Reference Facility Limitation • .'PART 11}STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS : • PART 12 _EASEMENTS/TRACTS •(May`require special•structural review) : Q Drainage Easement 0 Cast in Place Vault Q Other Q Access Easement Q Retaining Wall n Native Growth Protection Easement O Rockery>4'High (l Tract Structural on Steep Slope El Other E =PART 14, SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER 1 or a civil engineer under my supervision have visited the site.Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the ;attatchments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate. "'d'Di^' IIA • XI. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS MANUAL GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERIN G STUDY ANMARCO PROPERTY BEACON COAL MINE ROAD AND MONSTER ROAD RENTON, WASHINGTON E-9875 January 18, 2002 PREPARED FOR GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. ��L QA A-fr 4" 1�� 1A \, t- litchell G. McGinnis Project Geologist - ' Np A. s `. as. C�04 11141„. 4rig c-0"' 4060/8 44. 1. ., Raymond A. Coglas, P.E. Project Manager Exp Rss Earth Consultants, Inc. 1805 - 136th Place Northeast, Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 (425) 643-3780 Toll Free 1-888-739-6670 °I IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT More construction problems are caused by site subsur- technical engineers who then render an opinion about face conditions than any other factor.As troublesome as overall subsurface conditions,•their likely reaction to subsurface problems can be, their frequency and extent proposed construction activity,and appropriate founda- I have been lessened considerably in recent years,due in tion design. Even under optimal circumstances actual large measure to programs and publications of ASFE/ conditions may differ from those inferred to exist, The Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in because no geotechnical engineer, no matter how the Geosciences. qualified,and no subsurface exploration program,no The following suggestions and observations are offered matter how comprehensive,can reveal what is hidden by to help you reduce the geotechnical-related delays, earth, rock and time.The actual interface between mate- d rials may be far more gradual or abrupt than a report cost-overruns and other costly headaches that can indicates.Actual conditions in areas not sampled may occur during a construction project. differ from predictions. Nothing can be done to prevent the unanticipated,but steps can be taken to help minimize their A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING impact. For this reason,most experienced owners retain their REPORT IS BASED ON A UNIQUE SET geotechnical consultants through the construction stage,to iden- tify variances,conduct additional tests which may be OF PROJECT-SPECIFIC FACTORS needed,and to recommend solutions to problems A geotechnical engineering report is based on a subsur- encountered on site. face exploration plan designed to incorporate a unique 1 set of project-specific factors.These typically include: SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS the general nature of the structure involved, its size and CAN CHANGE configuration;the location of the structure on the site and its orientation; physical concomitants such as Subsurface conditions may be modified by constantly- access roads, parking lots,and underground utilities, changing natural forces. Because a geotechnical engi- and the level of additional risk which the client assumed neering report is based on conditions which existed at by virtue of limitations imposed upon the exploratory the time of subsurface exploration,construction decisions program.To help avoid costly problems,consult the should not be based on a geotechnical engineering report whose geotechnical engineer to determine how any factors adequacy may have been affected by time.Speak with the geo- which change subsequent to the date of the report may technical consultant to learn if additional tests are affect its recommendations. advisable before construction starts. Unless your consulting geotechnical engineer indicates Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and otherwise,your geotechnical engineering report should not natural events such as floods,earthquakes or ground- I be used: water fluctuations may also affect subsurface conditions 1 •When the nature of the proposed structure is and,thus,the continuing adequacy of a geotechnical I changed,for example,if an office building will be report.The geotechnical engineer should be kept erected instead of a parking garage, or if a refriger- apprised of any such events,and should be consulted to ated warehouse will be built instead of an unre- determine if additional tests are necessary frigerated one; 1 ••when the size or configuration of the proposed GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE "' 1 structure is altered: PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES •when the location or orientation of the proposed structure is modified: AND PERSONS •when there is a change of ownership,or Geotechnical engineers' reports are prepared to meet •for application to an adjacent site. the specific needs of specific individuals.A report pre- Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility for problems pared for a consulting civil engineer may not be ade- 1 • which may develop if they are not consulted after factors consid- quate for a construction contractor,or even some other ered in their report's development have changed. consulting civil engineer. Unless indicated otherwise, this report was prepared expressly for the client involved 1 and expressly for purposes indicated by the dient. Use MOST GEOTECHNICAL "FINDINGS" by any other persons for any purpose,or by the dient ARE PROFESSIONAL ESTIMATES for a different purpose, may result in problems. No indi- vidual other than the client should apply this report for its Site exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions intended purpose without first conferring with the geotechnical only at those points where samples are taken,when engineer. No person should apply this report for any purpose they are taken.Data derived through sampling and sub- other than that originally contemplated without first conferring sequent laboratory testing are extrapolated by geo- with the geotechnical engineer. 1 • A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING der the mistaken impression that simply disdaiming re- REPORT IS SUBJECT TO sponsibility for the accuracy of subsurface information MISINTERPRETATION always insulates them from attendant liability.Providing the best available information to contractors helps pre- Costly problems can occur when other design profes- vent costly construction problems and the adversarial sionals develop their plans based on misinterpretations attitudes which aggravate them to disproportionate of a geotechnical engineering report.lb help avoid scale. these problems,the geotechnical engineer should be retained to work with other appropriate design profes- READ RESPONSIBILITY sionals to explain relevant geotechnical findings and to CLAUSES CLOSELY review the adequacy of their plans and specifications relative to geotechnical issues. Because geotechnical engineering is based extensively on judgment and opinion,it is far less exact than other design disciplines.This situation has resulted in wholly unwarranted daims being lodged against geotechnical BORING LOGS SHOULD NOT BE consultants.lb help prevent this problem,geotechnical FROM THE engineers have developed model dauses for use in writ- SEPARATEDten transmittals.These are not exculpatory dauses ENGINEERING REPORT designed to foist geotechnical engineers'liabilities onto someone else.Rather,they are definitive dauses which Final boring logs are developed by geotechnical engi- identifywheregeotechnical engineers'responsibilities neers based upon g their interpretation of field logs begin and end.Their use helps all parties involved rec (assembled by site personnel)and laboratory evaluation ognize their individual responsibilities and take appro- of field samples.Only final boring logs customarily are priate action.Some of these definitive dauses are likely • induded in geotechnical engineering reports.These logs to appear in your geotechnical engineering report,and should not under any circumstances be redrawn for indusion in you are encouraged to read them dosely.Your geo- architectural or other design drawings,because drafters technical engineer will be pleased to give full and frank may commit errors or omissions in the transfer process. answers to your questions. Although photographic reproduction eliminates this problem,it does nothing to minimize the possibility of OTHER STEPS YOU CAN TAKE TO contractors misinterpreting the logs during bid prepara- tion.When this occurs,delays,disputes and unantici- REDUCE RISK pated costs are the all-too-frequent result. Your consulting geotechnical engineer will be pleased to To minimize the likelihood of boring log misinterpreta- discuss other techniques which can be employed to mit- tion,give contractors ready access to the complete geotechnical igate risk. In addition,ASFE has developed a variety of • engineering report prepared or authorized for their use. materials which may be beneficial.Contact ASFE for a Those who do not provide such access may proceed un- complimentary copy of its publications directory • r II Published by ASFE THE ASSOCIATION OF ENGINEERING FIRMS PRACTICING IN THE GEOSCIENCES 8811 Colesville Road/Suite G 106/Silver Spring, Maryland 20910/(301) 565-2733 0788/3M z5`'I fit 4\ Earth Consultants Inc. r� r�'�� Geotechnical Engineers.Geologists&Environmental Scientists • January 18, 2002 E-9875 Gary Merlino Construction Co., Inc. 9125 - 10th South Seattle, Washington 98109 Attention: Mr. Gary Merlino Dear Mr. Merlino: We are pleased to submit our report entitled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, AnMarCo Property, Beacon Coal Mine Road and Monster Road, Renton, Washington". This report presents the results of our field exploration, selective laboratory tests, and engineering analyses. The attached study provides a summary of our field exploration, site observations, engineering analyses and recommendations for accomplishing the planned grading and supporting the west side of the proposed gravel parking area. We appreciate this opportunity to have been of service to you. If you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please call. Respectfully submitted, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. Scott Dinkelman, CEG Associate Engineering Geologist MGM/SDD/RAC/Fne i . Earth Consultants,Inc. 1805-136th Place N.E.,Suite 201,Bellevue,Washington 98005 Bellevue(425)643-3780 FAX(425)746-0860 Toll Free(888)739-6670 TABLE OF CONTENTS E-9875 PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 General 1 Project Description 1 SITE CONDITIONS 0 2 Surface 2 Subsurface 3 a% Existing Modular Block Wall 5 Groundwater 5 Laboratory Testing 6 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6 General 6 Modular Block Wall 7 Excavations and Slopes 7 Site Preparation and General Earthwork 8 Seismic Design Considerations 10 LIMITATIONS 11 Additional Services 11 Earth Consultants, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS, Continued E-9875 APPENDICES Appendix A Field Exploration Appendix B Laboratory Test Results ILLUSTRATIONS Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Test Pit Location Plan Plate 3 Three Block Wall Configuration Plate Al Legend Plates A2 through A9 Test Pit Logs Plate B1 Grain Size Analyses Earth.Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY ANMARCO PROPERTY BEACON COAL MINE ROAD AND MONSTER ROAD RENTON, WASHINGTON E-9875 INTRODUCTION General This report presents the results of the geotechnical engineering study completed by Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) for the AnMarCo Property, Beacon Coal Mine Road and Monster Road, Renton, Washington. The general location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1: The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface conditions in the area of the west-facing slope along the west side of Beacon Coal Mine Road, and to provide specific geotechnical engineering recommendations for the earthwork and proposed modification of an existing modular block wall along the west side of the site. Project Description We understand that you plan to regrade a portion of the existing commercial property west of the intersection of Beacon Coal Mine Road and Monster Road for construction of a gravel parking and storage area. At the time that our study was performed, the site, existing structures, and our exploration locations were approximately as shown on the Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 2. Based on preliminary design information, cuts on the order of two (2) to twelve (12) feet will be required to reach proposed finished grade within the limits of the planned gravel parking area. Two to four feet of fill will be required to reach finished grades in the southcentral and western portions of the site. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 2 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002. The immediate eastern portion of the proposed parking ng area will be bounded to the east by an approximately twelve (12) to sixteen (16) foot high southwest and west-facing cut slope. The proposed cut slope will extend up from the parking area to the western shoulder of Beacon Coal Mine Road at 2H:1V (Horizontal to Vertical). The proposed parking area will extend from approximately one hundred (100) to two hundred fifty (250) feet in an east-west direction from the toe of slope to the west side of the development area at a gradient of 5 percent or less. The western limits of the planned parkingarea will be supported byan approximately pP four hundred thirty (430) foot long, nine foot high modular ("ecology") block wall. The proposed wall is to be constructed along the same alignment as a six foot high block wall that currently exists along the western limits of the proposed parking area. The height of the wall along the current wall alignment will be increased to nine feet by adding an additional level of blocks along the entire length of the existing wall. Up to four feet of fill will be placed behind the wall in the immediate southeastern portion of the proposed grading area. The conclusions and recommendations in this study are based on our understanding of the proposed improvements which are based on the project information provided us. If the above project description is incorrect or the project information changes, we should be consulted to review the recommendations contained in this study and make modifications, if needed. SITE CONDITIONS Surface .,; The subject site consists of an irregularly-shaped, industrially-zoned property located immediately west of the intersection of Beacon Coal Mine Road and Monster Road in Renton (see Plate 1, Vicinity Map). The planned development area extends (a) approximately two hundred (200) to two hundred and fifty (250) feet in an east-west direction from the west side of Beacon Coal Mine Road to an existing gravel road within the western portion of the site and (b) approximately six hundred (600) feet in a north- south direction from an asphalt paved access road on the south side of the site north to Beacon Mine Road on the north side of the site. The overall topography of the site slopes to the west-southwest at gradients ranging from - nearly level to approximately 80 percent. Earth Consultants, Inc. • GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 3 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002. The northwestern portion of the planned development area consists of a relatively level bench approximately three hundred and sixty (360) foot long (north-south) and twenty (20) to one hundred and twenty (120) feet wide (east-west). The east side of the bench is bounded by a four to twelve (12) foot high south-southwest facing slope that extends up to Beacon Coal Mine Road. The western side of the bench consists of an approximately ten (10) foot high southwest facing slope that descends to a gravel ,-. storage area at gradients on the order of 40 to 80 percent. The benched portion of the site is currently undeveloped. The southern and western portions of the site consist of a relatively-level, gravel-covered parking and storage area. The topography within this area slopes gradually to the south- southwest at gradients of typically 10 percent or less. The northwestern portion of the planned development area contains a twenty (20) foot high southwest facing excavated slope that extends down to an existing detention pond at gradients of approximately 40 to 80 percent. The western and southern portions of the site are covered by gravel. The bench area in the northeastern portion of the planned development area is vegetated by localized small to medium diameter trees with a dense understory of blackberry bushes and miscellaneous brush. Subsurface Subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating eight test pits in the vicinity of the proposed cut slope adjacent to Beacon Coal Mine Road. The approximate locations of our test pits are shown on Plate 2. Please refer to the Test Pits Logs, Plates A2 through A9, for a detailed description of the conditions encountered at each location explored. A description of the field exploration methods is included in Appendix A. The following is a generalized description of the subsurface conditions encountered. At our test pit locations, we encountered a surficial layer of topsoil and duff. The topsoil and duff layer was typically six (6) to twelve (12) inches thick with localized areas up to • eighteen (18) inches thick as encountered in Test Pits TP-4 and TP-8. The topsoil was characterized by its dark brown color, loose consistency, and the presence of abundant roots and organic debris. The topsoil is not suitable for support of the proposed modular block wall, and should not be used as structural fill. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 4 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002. Underlying the topsoil at six of our eight test pit locations, we encountered two and one half to six feet of fill. The fill consists of loose to medium dense silty sand (Unified Soil Classification, SM) and sandy silt (ML) with varying amounts of gravel. The fill soils are similar in appearance to the underlying native soils but are characterized by their loose consistency and disturbed appearance. Underlying the fill at two of our test pit locations, we encountered a layer of what appears to be an old slope wash deposit. In Test Pits TP-1 and TP-2 in the southern portion of the exploration area, we encountered seven to seven and one half feet of medium dense silty sand (SM) with varying amounts of gravel, cobbles, and occasional boulders. The gravel and cobbles were comprised primarily of weathered, subangular to subrounded igneous rocks. Underlying the topsoil, duff, and fill in Test Pits TP-3, TP-4, TP-5, and TP-6 we encountered four and one half feet of medium dense to dense silt (ML). The silt encountered in Test Pits TP-3, TP-4, and TP-5 was massive to thinly laminated. The silt encountered in Test Pit TP-6 consisted of highly weathered medium dense silt with no apparent lamina. At all of our test pit locations we encountered a layer of weathered to unweathered glacial till to a maximum depth of sixteen and one half (16.5) feet below existing grade. The glacial till was encountered underlying fill, slope wash, laminated silt, or directly underlying the topsoil and duff depending on the location of the excavation. At our test pit locations, the till consisted of medium dense to very dense silty sand with varying amounts of gravel. The glacial till typically became dense to very dense at depths ranging from twelve and one half (12.5) to sixteen (16) feet below grade. Underlying the glacial till in Test Pits TP-3 and TP-8, we encountered highly fractured weathered bedrock of what is likely the Tukwila Formation (Map Unit Tt). The bedrock was encountered at ten and one half (10.5) feet below grade in Test Pit TP-8 and at fifteen (15) feet below grade in Test Pit TP-3. At both of the locations, we encountered refusal and only a small amount of the rock was recovered from the excavation. The samples recovered appeared to be comprised of highly weathered sandstone/conglomerate with igneous derived clasts consistent with those defined in the Tukwila Formation. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 5 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002. Existing Modular (Ecology) Block Wall As part of our study, we reviewed the condition of the existing modular block wall on the west side of the site. It is planned to increase the height of the west wall by three feet. The immediate western limit of the proposed parking area is supported by an existing modular block wall situated on a relatively level bench currently being used as a container storage area. The existing wall consists of an approximately four hundred thirty (430) f;i foot long wall constructed of 3-foot wide by 3-foot thick by 6-foot long concrete blocks. The wall consists of two courses of blocks with the base course embedded approximately four to six inches below grade. At several locations along the wall, we observed two to four inch gaps between the individual blocks and sections where the upper course of blocks has rotated over the edge of the base course. During our reconnaissance, we did not observe indications of free draining gravel or a drain pipe behind the existing wall. In our opinion, portions of the existing wall may need to be dismantled and re-aligned prior to placement of the additional row of blocks. Groundwater Light to moderate groundwater seepage was encountered at twelve (12) feet below grade in Test Pit TP-1 . In addition, mottled soils and increased soil moisture were encountered at widely varying depths throughout the site. The observed seepage, mottling, and increased soil moisture appear to be indicative of a perched groundwater condition. Based on the observed soil and groundwater conditions at our test pit locations, it is possible groundwater seepage will be encountered in site excavations depending on the time of year the grading is conducted. The contractor should be aware that groundwater is not static. There will be fluctuations in the level depending on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other factors. Generally, the water level is higher and seepage rate is greater in the wetter winter months. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 6 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002. Laboratory Testing Laboratory tests were conducted on several representative soil samples to verify or modify the field soil classification and to evaluate the general physical properties and engineering characteristics of the soil encountered. Visual field classifications were supplemented by grain size analyses on representative soil samples. Moisture content • tests were performed on all samples. The results of laboratory tests performed on specific samples are provided either at the appropriate sample depth on the individual test pit logs or on a separate data sheet contained in Appendix B. It is important to note that these test results may not accurately represent the overall in-situ soil conditions. Our geotechnical recommendations are based on our interpretation of these test results and their use in guiding our engineering judgment. ECI cannot be responsible for the interpretation of these data by others. In accordance with our Standard Fee Schedule and General Conditions, the soil samples for this project will be discarded after a period of fifteen (15) days following completion of this report unless we are otherwise directed in writing. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on the results of our study, in our opinion the proposed improvements can be completed generally as planned. Our test pits indicate the eastern limit of the planned development area is underlain by loose fill overlying loose to very dense native soil and a.y weathered bedrock. In our opinion this area can be regraded to a permanent gradient of 2H:1V. F In our opinion, the existing modular block wall can be raised to a maximum height of nine feet provided (a) drainage is installed behind the wall, (b) the existing blocks that have - rotated are straightened, and (c) the base course of blocks is embedded by placing twelve (12) inches of structural fill in front of the wall. • I - Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 7 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002. This report has been prepared for specific application to this project only and in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area for the exclusive use of Gary Merlino Construction Co. Inc. and AnMarCo and their respective representatives. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This report, in its entirety, should be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. Modular Block Wall In order to achieve final grades, it is planned to increase the height of the modular block wall on the west side of the site. The existing wall is constructed of solid concrete blocks measuring about three feet high, three feet deep, and six feet long. The existing wall is two courses high -- about six feet. The height of the wall will be increased by one block, resulting in a final wall height of nine feet. As part of our field exploration, we observed the condition of the existing wall. The existing wall was constructed vertically. In some areas, we observed the wall has rotated beyond vertical. The base course of the blocks was observed to be embedded four to six inches into the ground. During our review, we did not observe indications of free draining gravel or a drain pipe behind the wall. In our opinion, the height of the existing wall can be increased generally as planned. However, where the existing wall has rotated, the existing blocks should be pushed into a vertical position. 4-.I. A drainage zone should also be installed behind the.existing and new portions of the wall. At a minimum, the drainage zone should consist of an eighteen (18) inch wide layer of free draining rock placed at the full height of the wall.. A four inch diameter perforated collector pipe should be installed at the base of the drain rock. The collector pipe should consist of rigid PVC. We do not recommend using corrugated plastic pipe. The drain rock should consist of pea gravel or washed rock. The base course of blocks should also be embedded at least twelve (12) inches below finished grade. This can be accomplished by placing an additional six to eight inches of structural fill in front of the existing wall. Earth Consultants,Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 8 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002. Please refer to Plate 3 (Three Block Wall Configuration) for a schematic drawing of the wall and drainage configuration. Excavations and Slopes The following information is provided solely as a service to our client. Under no circumstances should this information be interpreted to mean that ECI is assuming responsibility for construction site safety or the Contractor's activities; such responsibility is not being implied and should not be inferred. The inclination of temporary slopes is dependent on several variables, including the height of the cut, the soil type and density, the presence of groundwater seepage, construction timing, weather, and surcharge loads from adjacent structures, roads and equipment. In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state (WISHA), and Federal (OSHA) safety regulations. Based on the information obtained from our field exploration and laboratory testing, in our opinion the upper loose to medium dense fill and native soils would be classified as Type C by OSHA/WISHA. Temporary cuts greater than four feet in height in Type C soils should be sloped at an inclination of 1.5H:1 V. The underlying dense to very dense native soil and weathered bedrock would be classified as Type A by OSHA/WISHA. Temporary cuts greater than four feet in height in Type A soils may be sloped at an inclination of 0.75H:1V. The lower four feet of temporary cuts a Type A soils may be cut vertically. Because of the many variables involved, the inclination of temporary excavation slopes should be evaluated during construction, as the actual soil conditions become more apparent. ECI should be on-site to observe the excavations and to assess the soil conditions exposed in the excavation. If during construction, slopes of this inclination, or flatter, cannot be constructed, temporary shoring may be necessary. Shoring will help protect against slope or excavation collapse, and will provide protection to workers in the excavation. If temporary shoring is needed, we can provide shoring design criteria: • Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 9 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002. Permanent cut and fill slopes should be inclined no steeper than 2H:1V. Cut slopes should be observed by ECI during excavation to verify that conditions are as anticipated. Supplementary recommendations can then be developed, if needed, to improve stability, including flattening of slopes or installation of surface or subsurface drains. Due to the presence of bedrock observed at some of the test pits, difficult digging conditions may be encountered along the proposed cut slope. Permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. Site Preparation and General Earthwork The proposed development area should be stripped and cleared of all topsoil, vegetation, duff, or other organic or deleterious material. A representative from ECI should observe the prepared subgrade. Existing utility pipes, that will be abandoned should be plugged or removed so they do not provide a conduit for water and cause stability problems. Following the stripping operation and excavations necessary to reach construction subgrade elevations, the ground surface where structural fill, foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be placed should be observed by an ECI representative. Proofrolling may be necessary to identify soft or unstable areas. Proofrolling should be performed under the observation of a representative of ECI. Soil in loose or soft areas, if recompacted and still excessively yielding, should be overexcavated and replaced with structural fill to a depth that will provide a stable base beneath the general structural fill. The optional use of a geotextile fabric placed directly on the overexcavated surface may help to bridge unstable areas. Structural fill is defined as compacted fill placed under load-bearing areas. Structural fill under footings or the modular block walls should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding twelve (12) inches in loose thickness and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of its laboratory maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-91 (Modified Proctor). The fill materials should be placed at or near their optimum moisture content. Fill under pavements and walks should also be placed in horizontal lifts and compacted to 90 percent of maximum dry density except for the top twelve (12) inches, which should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum dry density. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 10 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002. During dry weather, most soils that are compactible and non-organic can be used as structural fill. Based on the results of our laboratory tests, the on-site soils at the time of our exploration appear to be near the optimum moisture content and should be suitable for use in their present condition as structural fill, provided that the grading operations are conducted during dry weather. However, laboratory testing indicates the site soils have - greater than 5 percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve. Soil with fines in this range will degrade if exposed to excessive moisture, and compaction and grading will be difficult if the soil moisture increases significantly above its optimum condition. If the site soil is exposed to moisture and cannot be adequately compacted, then it may be necessary to import a soil that can be compacted. During dry weather, any non- organic compactible granular soil with a maximum aggregate size of three inches can be used. Fill for use during wet weather should consist of a fairly well graded granular material having a maximum aggregate size of three inches and no more than 5 percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve based on.the minus 3/4-inch fraction. A contingency in the earthwork budget should be included for this possibility. Seismic Design Considerations The Puget Lowland is classified as a Seismic Zone 3 in the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). Earthquakes occur in the Puget Lowland with regularity. However, the majority of these events are of such low magnitude they are not felt without instruments. Large earthquakes do occur, as indicated by the 1949, 7.2 magnitude earthquake in the Olympia area, the 1965, 6.5 magnitude earthquake in the Midway area, and the 2001, 6.8 magnitude Nisqually earthquake. There are three potential geologic hazards associated with a strong motion seismic event at this site: ground rupture, liquefaction, and ground motion response. Ground Rupture: The strongest earthquakes in the Puget Lowland are widespread, subcrustal events, ranging in depth from thirty (30) to fifty-five (55) miles. Surface faulting from these deep events has not been documented to date. Therefore, it is our opinion, that the risk of ground rupture at this site during a strong motion seismic event is negligible. Earth Consultants,Inc. II GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 11 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002. Liquefaction: Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which soils lose all shear strength for short periods of time during an earthquake. Groundshaking of sufficient duration results in the loss of grain to grain contact and rapid increase in pore water pressure, causing the soil to behave as a fluid. To have a potential for liquefaction, a soil must be cohesionless with a grain size distribution of a specified range (generally sand and silt); it must be loose; it must be below the groundwater table; and it must be subject to sufficient magnitude and duration of groundshaking. The effects of liquefaction may be large total and/or differential settlement for structures founded in the liquefying soils. In our opinion, the potential for liquefaction induced settlement of the medium dense to very dense soils encountered at this site should be negligible provided that the recommendations contained in our report are followed. Ground Motion Response: The 1997 UBC seismic design section provides a series of soil types that are used as a basis for seismic design of structures. Based on the encountered soil conditions, it is our opinion that soil type Sc, Very Dense Soil and Soft Rock from Table 16-J should be used for design. LIMITATIONS Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses, the design information provided us, and our experience and engineering judgment. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently y practicing under similar conditions in this area. No warranty is expressed or implied. 4 The recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the test pits. Soil and groundwater conditions between test pits may vary from those encountered. The nature and extent of variations between our exploratory locations may not become evident until construction. If variations do appear, ECI should be requested to reevaluate the recommendations of this report and to modify or verify them in writing prior to proceeding with the construction. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Page 12 Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. E-9875 January 18, 2002. Additional Services As the geotechnical engineer of record, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design and specifications to verify that the earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and in the construction specifications. ECI should also be retained to provide geotechnical services during construction. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. We do not accept responsibility for the performance of foundations or earthwork unless we are retained to review the construction drawings and specifications, and to provide construction observation and testing services. r r Ci Earth Consultants, Inc. _ •.F.-. J s yijf y, I;:! i -[ K'1{ e� 9 i.�, �• ^�.v i .,' ! \b.,C:. - ....N.J. 1 \ : 4 4 r''T ,---- ....• • - - . . ._ _,.. ,,„....,. . ::„. F s.„,. „. 4 .,, .. • • ..„ . "....„,,,,,..... ...ROO ".. T rr f • .,E Y!. - :[ .. 41` Rr.S'}Ir - .II�[]'lliJ/@"PiX7fG.`f 4 =4�'s�j?( '.i 1424e71 IT _ `.7t, f • i:'f 6 rs I ,4.,d}. 4` 3 •$�e ,j� _ -��.�i11 ` '.,:,t�j�•.rr `. ,<, 0 '—) re-4 1 ilk- "1141 rt-s.A1):4:\ "4‘ ::::;'..)FAcx *: fir. , - ..T... #•�-. t . ,:-:1 I - a `. tips Y<. i;:':. ,,:,. S 'i t ioh, ,urs. t '• ..F yt !CNN' i SS:a'.r"'.. .?�,;:.`,:q� t, off,;; y. 6!til ST 44�ryry•yyyy�,. T 3ith t $! l7,— E arao-'. ,,' }:��r .,,i.1i6 ti '. ._,__ iM .ai 14,L1 f ."Y,:�f y. ,k3` .rEth 2•'c 1.Z •.,:.,. '• +i-,;.x.,-.:--.1 `''i �},g�p gay;f Ir•- '.i '�' Si_ _ 'y.44_t�` Y.,,;..; ,'yr,i �`i.*---�•t"'t_. i 14'1 E 4 4,-f i 1� : -` 's i{i>iY-:a r• '� .r'. ''r r ''A, `� i i y3 k i } f ,gym `. st .. . rxi {.r. ..,� .n_ .n. i. �S �ti `1n ST .f,;.'..=f 'itY"'X`r.. fr 81 :} v '+ I 6 LS250 FL ttI ', LP i T 1 t jt • f It i T s.!!,5 ,Z• SaMii:arrER i wi €f .uttgsi r i y} }� phi �br {• $ .i ''3 G9la1 J,2� i '' ! �31a1 ,,t' • 4' . ry:., :i i^, S .� i'7 7,1; • '!`YAGe •ayys� 1 5 ��l, - `- r ; £�Lbta " F - ji STD f�sM � r"i "S� . I.. !![ 3Y �i bi, i4 RH9lfd Tim•', !:. ----IT... ,r: :"gig ;Jh� • . �__,...w : {.,i'i t #74; •,'•...e .w.e r yf .arc. �'S ' f 0--'..4i,-'.9J1,,-.1 •-$�„€..iPi t i i.-- j"i i-x rim __.ST�R lit t. 4 �•.1 ! } afCt!( } if , fiL+� a1f ST„..___ -.1{ .31tifitt Sr! k. ■ . 2f 5 117111 S7 1 ,,,,: ■ rr SJv7Kr r ;i x,TdCK ; >4I; fi ' , =Cd[rrl X n DR r i 1 i z i . . '; i:c�tr7 • . ' J •"',.. l . — f ? _ f A".b . r uk'fir '- •4• -g l"'';a, "4„,{+ • ti• A? fi f 2s '-.,�% , yr r ki f`j 1 I .i� �leslr _ 1'' .f,I.. t i I Reference: ; I�-- .Ih Earth Consultants, Inc. Puget Sound Area wry `f�� �y Georechnid engineers Geologists&Environmental scientists King County/Map 655 . By Thomas Brothers Maps Dated 2002 Vicinity Map AnMarCo Property Renton, Washington NOTE:This plate may contain areas of color. , ECI cannot be responsible for any subsequent Drwn. GLS Date Sept 2001 Pro]. No. 9875 misinterpretation of the information resulting from black&white reproductions of this plate. Checked MGM Date 9/24/01 Plate 1 Proposed Access MONSTER ROAD Road 70 i i / , ;;; __ ,-- ``N� . �Ye : ro:te p Scale Top of2:1 Slope -,"" -- -� _ _ _ _ ;_ _ - �.,\"� , 0 0 160ft. • _ — - ��e a I TP-1 �..N. - 1 i .1P-841--313--::"Y----- z <IP i .,.. _...._.-lk._--.._:.._ :....-------___:-4 r..-------- - I L"-.3 `= �O t� "�_ - - LEGEND �. �= I _E / ,,� - . co j,/ g 50 N ------------- - I TP-1 -1-Approximate Location of � P 2 ECI Test Pit, Proj. No. /i x Existing _- (Asphalt Paving E-9875, Sept. 2001 QV - -- 40 I Subject Site O I V / -� �------------------ I ' Existing Ecology Block / ___----40--- . ® .., „ - L. � 1 1i1� Wall 166.11 0 / — —_—--_--__---. _-38-—— �4,® Limits of Construction1146_ _= -`* - ® � Existing Topography 44 ' , �!�% '� -ram- cau,_ _� ; Existing -' �. Proposed/ ' /1i�ii is •l� I - -rr`"` Ecology Block Wall , p Finish Grade ./' ,i/�� 1 -. .�..—22 rrr-� ` 32//IA\1 i` (24 Grave Dnv rrr..• / 111 ���rrrrrar- . �I I�'I j a I`I e. i imits of Construction Existing / U'ra`. 2s 6..�1J i 2q : Asphalt Paving - . . e�0 is 40011 : Existing _ - �' : Ecology Block Wall e'4 • 20 i _ i I — 20 - , ili _ - — 20 � Earth Consultants, Inc. a. 11`'� I j���y��J GeotechNml Engineers.Gedo�sts 8 Envlronrnental Sdentlsts NOTE:This plate may contain areas of color. ECI cannot Test Pit Location Plan • be responsible for any subsequent misinterpretation of _ AnMarCo Property the-e-information-resuftingfrom-black-&-white-reproductions - — Renton, Washington of this plate. Drwn., GLS Date Nov.2001 Proj.No. 9875 Checked MGM Date 11/29/01 Plate 2 Modular Block Wall 3H x 3W x 6L Storage Surcharge (Typical) 100psf IIIIIIIII-III-III J , A io op00 I0 0, o 0 fo -o c 0 co 18" Min. rita. oc Free Draining,Backfill I'° ° O oo c• ' load O 0c 0 1 0 , 8' p 1'0 00 0 O IP �o c 0 o0 ',o 000C ci O oo Io"°oo 'I 0 c tp0 c 0� Mirafi 140N ► f. p°o° t o''n • 1' Min. HEM-Mall �.� Embedment Depth I I I— • 4"Diameter .. Rigid Perforated PVC Drain Surround with 1 Cubic Foot Per Lineal Foot Pea Gravel SCHEMATIC ONLY-NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING \��Ii���1 '�;��� Earth Consultants, Inc. ,_ ,) Geotechnical Engineers,Geologists 8 Environmental scientists Three Block Wall Configuration AnMarCo Property Renton, Washington Drwn. GLS Date Nov.2001 Pro]. No. 9875 Checked MGM Date 11/29/01 Plate 3 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION E-9875 Our field exploration was performed on September 13, 2001 . Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by excavating eight test pits in the vicinity of Beacon Coal Mine Road. The test pits were excavated using an excavator provided by the client. Approximate test pit locations were estimated by pacing from site features depicted on the site plan provided by the client. The locations and elevations of the test pits should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. These approximate locations are shown on the Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 2. . The field exploration was continuously monitored by a geologist from our firm who classified the soils encountered, maintained a log of each test pit, obtained representative samples, measured groundwater levels, and observed pertinent site features. The samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, which is presented on Plate Al, Legend. Representative soil samples were collected and :...;i returned to our laboratory for further examination and testing. Logs of our test pits are included as Plates A2 through A9. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and the results of the laboratory examination and tests of field samples. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. . In actuality, the transitions may be more gradual. Earth Consultants, Inc. MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAPH LETTER TYPICAL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL SYMBOL Gravel ~ C3 A A ® GW Well-Graded Gravels,Gravel-Sand And Clean Gravels 1 O n v elV elgW Mixtures,Little Or No Fines Gravelly (little or no fines) r se Coarr Soils , . , . GP Poorly-Graded Gravels,Gravel- IiI rained se gp Sand Mixtures;Little Or No Fines ,• Soils More Than 1 50% Coarse Gravels With II li GM g Silty Gravels,Gravel-Sand- Fraction Fines(appreciable 11 111 Silt Mixtures Retained On amount of fines) - fO ,/� GC Clayey Gravels,Gravel-Sand- No.4 Sieve # # gc Clay Mixtures Sand : •e O; ".. SW Well-Graded Sands, Gravelly • And Clean Sand " c 0'e o o SW Sands, Little Or No Fines More Than Sandy (little or no fines) �S .• :• Soils .?' gj ,5:; SP Poorly-Graded Sands, Gravelly 50% Material trt: Sp Sands, Little Or No Fines • Larger Than More Than No.200 Sieve ? SM Size 50% Coarse Sands With Snl Silty Sands,Sand-Silt Mixtures Fraction Fines(appreciable Passing No.4 .••'.�- ' ' • r SC amount of fines) -• ,: •$n SC Clayey Sands, Sand-Clay Mixtures '� Sieve :.>'•r�' .:-..,te _ P ML Inorganic Silts&Very Fine Sands,Rock Floi.r,Silty- III ml Clayey Fine Sands;Clayey Silts wr Slight Plasticity i Fine Silts Grained Arid Liquid Limit CL Inorganic Clays Of Low To Medium Plasticity, • Less Than 50 CI Gravelly Clays, Sandy Clays, Silty Clays, Lean Soils Clays _ ill I i I Organic Silts And Organic I III Hall lI Ole Ol Silty Clays Of Low Plasticity • MH Inorganic Silts,Micaceous Or Diatomaceous Fire I More Than mh Sand Or Silty Soils 50% Material Silts Smaller T#an Liquid Limit No.200 Sieve And Greater Than 50 CH Inorganic Clays Of High Size Clays Ch Plasticity, Fat Clays. ./% OH .Organic Clays Of Medium To'High i� Oh Plasticity, Organic Silts Highly Organic Soils ,. `t'! ���� .`1►r .a pi- Peat, Humus, Swamp Soils l: ,1 r, d r, d r, pt With High Organic Contents Topsoil /y y y y J Humus And Duff Layer Fill •�•�•�•�•��• • Highly Variable Constituents • •�•�•..•• The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the material presented in the attached logs. a., - DUAL SYMBOLS are used to Indicate borderline soil classification. C TORVANE READING,tsf I 2"O.D.SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER qu PENETROMETER READING,tsf W MOISTURE,%dry weight ]I 24"I.D.RING OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER P SAMPLER PUSHED * SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED i WATER OBSERVATION WELL pcf DRY DENSITY,lbs.per cubic ft. LL LIQUID UMW,% Q DEPTH OF ENCOUNTERED GROUNDWATER PI PLASTIC INDEX DURING EXCAVATION • Y SUBSEQUENT GROUNDWATER LEVEL W/DATE li • , lll,�4I; -I,)e. 441, LEGEND A(,, d) Earth Consultants Inc. �1li ,` (K.Itxtu,M d I nghnxxs,(uc �lsls a Environmental Scimisis Proj. No. 9875 I Date Oct.01' !Plate Al ;.1 Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of AnMarCo Property 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9875 MGM 9/13/01 TP-1 Excavation Contactor. Ground Surface Elevation: Client 50' Notes: 9. o m co -6 Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil&Duff 4"-6" General W . _ % t° E °i ii" co E Notes i gw o Al De �y♦ SM Dark brown silty SAND with gravel, loose,moist(Possible Fill) �♦�♦�♦ 1 . i ii♦'• 2 ♦.♦. ♦♦♦♦ 3 MI °°_ ♦H♦ I. -35%fines 13.0 •♦t, II♦♦•♦♦ 4 ♦♦♦♦ ••♦• 5 I SM Reddish brown silty SAND, medium dense, moist(Possible Slope 6 IMI II Wash) 7 . -contains gravel -trace boulders 8 - III s - 10 = 11 = 12 MI -light of moderate seep age at 12', becomes wet 13 • SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense to dense,wet MN La 14 immi r' 15 III 16.4 16 - -becomes dense Test pit terminated at 16.5 feet below existing grade. Perched • groundwater seepage encountered at 12.0 feet during excavation. NOTE: e Test pit elevations based on topography shown on Site Plan dated 6/3/2001. 0 O. U W a ,i''- 111- ,�!t1, Test Pit Log W ' 1�` 1 .4 Earth Consultants Inc. Q WO! \ow \lig/0 i"k�Mat hews.c� vsa Mtvlmnnwaal5arnnus AnMarCo Property f ! Renton,Washington J Proj.No. 9875 Dwn. GLS Date Oct 2001 Checked MGM I Date 10/3/01 I Plate A2 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment They are not necessanly representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of InfnlMnfinn nrin a fori nn hie Inn Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of AnMarCo Property 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 1. 9875 MGM 9/13/01 TP-2 Excavation Contactor. Ground Surface Elevation: Client 50' Notes: General W .2 — 0) - Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil &Duff 4"-6" Notes (%) o" m ai. ��•��� . SM Dark brown silty SAND, loose, moist(Possible Fill) ♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦N ♦♦♦• 2 3 SM Reddish brown silty SAND, medium dense, moist(Possible Slope Wash) 4 -trace cobbles and boulders • 6 9.6 8 9 10 SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense,wet 11 • 19.4 12 13 -becomes blue gray,dense Test pit terminated at 13.0 feet below a fisting grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. y r 0 n 8 C9 R. W foss, fp1. /"III Test Pit Log ! c `,� f Earth Consultants Inc. �11�1� I11l\AO �"�� AnMarCo Property �� ems . s&�vimnmenrai , Renton,Washington F1 Proj.No. 9875 Dwn. GLS Date Oct 2001 checked MGM Date 10/3/01 Plate A3 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this ectloratoly hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and �ufdgment The rcip } safely representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of ,.. Test Pit Log 1'. Project Name: Sheet of I. AnMarCo Property 1 1 , Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9875 MGM 9/13/01 TP-3 . ' Excavation Contactor Ground Surface Elevation: Client 55' Notes: 1 Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil &Duff 12" ,„, .c R. co TS General Notes ini -C .0 ••••• - Cl. 0 .0 a E la ii: E co CM 6- c). o CO D Cl) 1 r w ' •Ir • TPSL TOPSOIL and DUFF • i ;- SM Reddish brown silty SAND, loose, moist(Possible Fill) •-•• •-• •• 1 A* 2 II I 18.4 •e•• 1.1 •-•.- 3 46.46,•. _ .:! ML Brown SILT, medium dense to dense, moist 4 -laminated : -blocky I 39.9 1 ' 7 8 • • SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist 9 r, _ . . . 1, i 12 I . •. MI • • 1....s. • : 14 mi • I i . 7.9 ' •• .' 15 TUKVVILA FORMATION(Tt): Brown SANDSTONE/ • \CZIGLOMERATE highly weathered, highly fractured, moderately r Test pit terminated at 15.5 feet below eAsting grade. No groundwater encountered during mavation. 1 g I `--- 1 13 0. 2 ,ri .fi.„ 'pl. iiik Test Pit Log (ket-iiv,i1D Earth Consultants Inc. AnMarCo Property rj„, wiff miwir Grxecitnic-al F2181netis.Ceologr4S&EnvIronmenral Scientbis ' Renton,Washington • r41 Proj.No. 9875 Dwn. GLS Date Oct 2001 Checked MGM Date 10/3/01 Plate A4 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and 1 judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of Infowmofinn nnaccurfevi nn fhic Intl T.' . Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of AnMarCo Property 1 1 Ji. . Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9875 *MGM 9/13/01 TP-4 Excavation Contactor Ground Surface Elevation: • •i. Client . 55' Notes: I , 2 z 0 Surface conditions: Depth of Topsoil&Duff 18" -' General W :c .0 -.—E_ Jr._ a „u) 2 a- E I • Notes eX0 5 co>. a• (11 (;) >" co co I . • m. .1, . i TPSL TOPSOIL and DUFF • .1, . st, s ..! •••- ••-• ML Reddish brown sandy SILT, medium dense, moist(Possible Fill) ••-• +4• 2 - •• ••• — 25.2 ••-• •-• ••-• 3 — ••••• -trace small gravel f!..':T ••-• ••• — ••-• :,!-::i •-••• 4 1 ML Brown SILT, medium dense to dense, moist ; 5 32.5 ' 6 -laminated • -blocky . , 7 1 8 , . — SM Reddish brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist , : . • 9 I ; • i 12.9 1:1 1 — 11 — -27%fines ! i 1 12 I : : 13 — i•': 1 j 14 — -becomes dense • • : i 15 — 13.4 . . : . I 16 -becomes blue gray . Test pit terminated at 16.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. , 0 1- a I ill 1 = I 8 /O'F 1 p), 404. Test Pit Log 161 k--0 vi,110 Earth Consultants Inc. AnMarCo Property 0 Lk( ‘Ify ‘'Fit c.orectinic-diFzelneiss,Geologius&F2wImnmentalScienitn 11 Renton,Washington II Prof.No. 9875 Dwn. GLS Date Oct 2001 Checked MGM Date 10/3/01 Plate A5 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this oploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and 1 judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpnetation by others of .nfnrmatinn nmedanfael nn filic Inn Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of AnMarCo Property 1 1 1 Job No. Logged by. Date: Test Pit No.: 1 9875 MGM 9/13/01 TP-5 ContactorExcavation Ground Surface Elevation: Client 60' Notes: • :i• • General W L T a .8Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil&Duff 8" Notes (%) 0m o 'L cT)_ ♦�♦-♦4 SM Brown silty SAND, loose, moist(Possible Fill) ♦♦♦♦♦s i ♦♦-♦4 1 • ..-.I • • ♦♦1 . 111 .♦.• - ♦♦♦N♦ III ♦♦♦ - 3 •♦ ML Brown sandy SILT, loose to medium dense, moist(Possible Fill) ♦ �♦♦N 4 = ♦♦♦♦♦ - • ♦♦♦♦♦ 5 • 29.6 �♦��" T. .I, ♦•N• 6 ML Brown SILT, medium dense to dense, moist 7 I 28.4 8 -massive to thinly laminated 1 -blocky 9 1. 10 11 SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist to wet NN 12 I. 13 r , . 14 15 - -becomes wet,contains pockets of blue gray 16 11.11 -becomes blue gray Test pit terminated at 16.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. 0 1 F 1 8 W i a Log , .} 11 Earth Consultants Inc. Test Pit gs tllut(lift' \ r,/ CoyecfmkalFY� AnMarCo Property t� c��&Frvlmnnxnra�xltmtL Renton,Washington 01 Proj.No. 9875 Dwn. GLS Date Oct 2001 Checked MGM Date 10/3/01 Plate A6 Subsurface conditions depicted our observations at the time and location of this ' 1 judgment. They are not necessanljr pri:esentative of other times and locations.We cannot�c responsibilityratory hole,modified by engineering se ointerpretation tests,analysisyothers and 1 ,,,s.,..„,w,n +a.r„„,tile In,, accept for the use or interpretation by of Test Pit Log • Project Name: Sheet of AnMarCo Property 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9875 MGM 9/13/01 TP-6 • Excavation Contactor Ground Surface Elevation: Client S55' Notes: fi.2 Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil&Duff 12" c'• General W .0 . o. , .0 E Notes (%) E — •! • TPSL TOPSOIL and DUFF , 1 31.9 ML Mottled.brown SILT, medium dense, moist 2 3 4 5 6 SM Reddish brown silty SAND, medium dense, moist . . -trace gravel _• ._ 8 — 1 ) 17.3 9 10 11 12 • SM Blue gray silty SAND with gravel,very dense, moist 13 — 11.5 - 14 — = -31%fines Test pit terminated at 14.5 feet below odsting grade. No groundwater PI encountered during ocavation. • • 0_ . t.6 ..tks. )4, 41.1V Test Pit Log Oleg jj Earth Consultants Inc. AnMarCo Property Goorectink-al FzigInexls.Geologlits&Flwlmomersal St-km*7m Renton,Washington Proj.No. 9875' Own. GLS Date Oct 2001 Checked MGM Date 10/3/01 Plate A7 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this avloratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of .nfrbrrnatinn rt.-oar:wag:A nn fhic Inn Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of AnMarCo Property 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9875 MGM 9/13/01 TP-7 Excavation Contactor. Ground Surface Elevation: •• Client 60' • Notes: • General W t -6 r a ce .9 Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil&Duff 2"-3" E E U m Notes (%) ai in v> > N SM Brown silty SAND,dense, moist 8.3 • 2 SM Brown silty SAND with gravel,medium dense to dense, moist 4 5 — 6 • 7 — 8 9 — 229 10 • 11 — • 18.4 12 SM Blue gray silty SAND with gravel,very dense, moist 15.8 13 — Test pit terminated at 13.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during emavation. :'4 s • it W m ,•ass` 0, 44 Test Pit Log (het Ali Earth Consultants Inc.Y` AnMarCo Property L_q, \ Jt f!P Miiff GoNecimIcal F.nglnerss.Geologbas&Environmental Scientists Renton,Wa shington F� Proj.No. 9875 Dwn. GLS Date Oct 2001 Checked MGM Date 10/3/01 Plate A8 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this eploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment They�Qnot yhnecessanN representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of 1_. Test Pit Log 1 Project Name: Sheet of AnMarCo Property 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 9875 MGM 9/13/01 TP-8 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: Client 50' Notes: . • . o o t m kn Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil &Duff 18" General (�) -E o it Ti. - E, . ! Notes W ,1, , TPSL TOPSOIL and DUFF r 4 1 , •t' s 5 • •H� 2 — SM Mottled brown silty SAND, loose, moist(Possible Fill) w... ♦H • ♦•i♦ ♦•�•• 3 — �•�•�• . f 4 • SM Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist . i ' 6• 7 — 1 I 8 11.4 9 f - ' 10 — j -large cobbles 11 TUKWILA FORMATION(Tt): Brown CONGLOMERATE, highly \weatherprt, highly frar•.turarl moderately hard /— Test pit terminated at 11.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. 1 <..1 N 1] 0 2 w a g 44". " 44 f � 4 Test Pit Log �l�l�� 1�1��, Earth Consultants Inc. AnMarCo Property Renton,Washington 1 F° Poi.No. 9875 Dwn. GLS I Date Oct 2001 Checked MGM l Date 10/3/01 I Plate A9 i Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment They��d necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of Infetrmonetn. i II APPENDIX B LABORATORY TEST RESULTS E-9875 Earth Consultants,Inc. • SIEVE ANALYSIS- _ HYDROMETER ANALYSIS . o. SIZE OF OPENING ININCHES NUMBER O MESH PER INCH,U.S.STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM O 100 co a N '- r ����^N N M 40] OOp N O .4. O O p 0 O O O. O O,0 • \ �, 1 • 10 � m \ N9N.D 80 ti. \ ' 20 o `rl• -n •A ->, G] l l m 70 "`-. \ 30 n r a O —I �p m y ? T 60 �• `. \.6 \ 40 z v = S 50 ` 50 c 1 ' cn , m 73 f) 2 r.. 40 ' r* k M m fl 60 W 0 a' C) 3 . IQS: int:1• rv. -1 30 70 �n m 0 \ 0 n 20 • 80 __.1 10 90 Z 1 IIII I I I I I Milt 1 I I III I I I I l 111I m � 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 . O O CO !p v CO N OD fD v, M N Co 1D M N OO f0 ,� M N 100 -� D 0 N O CO !O et M N '- • O O O O O O O O 00 0 O p CI w GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS O O O O o O co i9 � n (� COBBLES COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE �„•, m ' GRAVEL SAND FINES o w ro L'•' 0" ° D 9 Borin or DEPTH 1.4"LI Z KEY USCS DESCRIPTION Moisture LL PL o d m D Test Pit No. (ft,) Content (%) rr � � .0limmim 0 y p TP-1 3.5 SM Dark brown silty SAND with gravel 13 p--- TP-4 10 SM Reddish brown silty SAND with gravel 12.9 ___ ___ md 0........- TP-6 13.5 SM Gray silty SAND with gravel 11.5 •—.— TP-7 2 SM Brown silty SAND 8.3 ___ ___ DISTRIBUTION E-9875 4 Copies Stoneway Concrete 1915 Maple Valley Highway Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: David L. Halinen, Esq. -44 2 Copies Gary Merlino Construction Co., Inc. 9125 -.10th South Seattle, Washington 98108 Attention: Gary Merlino 1 Copy Halinen Law Offices, PS 2115 North 30th, Suite 203 Tacoma, Washington 98403 Attention: David L. Halinen, Esq. 1 Copy Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 - 72"d Avenue South Kent, Washington 98032 Attention: Joe Hopper Earth Consultants,Inc. VI. ESC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN VI. ESC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN TESC elements are addressed as follows: • Clearing Limits: Clearing limits are delineated on the engineering plans and will be flagged in the field • Cover Measures: Cover measures are addressed in the TESC notes on the engineering plans • Perimeter Protection: Perimeter protection(silt fencing)is shown on the engineering plans • Sediment Retention: A sediment trap has been designed and located in the appropriate low point of the site • Surface Water Controls: An interceptor ditch has been shown on the engineering plans • Dust Control: Dust control by sprinkling will be utilized when necessary • Wet Season Construction: Construction will be conducted according to the City of Renton standards during the wet season • Maintenance: Maintenance requirements are detailed in the TESC notes on the engineering plans • Final Stabilization: Upon completion of the project, all disturbed areas will be stabilized and Best Management Practices removed if appropriate • 3555.005 [JMH/bq]