Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA96-066
"'"' LOG G architects vdlc dnd9n prwP.ar©lettects I 101S.dexter ave..n aulte 2e0 matt..WA some(20e)280-4764 �s CHst 1.i..'jr•.xs dzaeix i s Ye I _ r. �.m CBY2 E=1329 EKISTO BIDEWAI/c • \ . y g '♦;,'�'� FLDV RESTRICTDR MATSIRFCH� a. 1 I I B'SD • CBY6 , s"v wx+sa TE=39S17.5 INTAKENA TE=19.6 �•4 c ]E=EIF13/{ 1 OILF r, EVEL _x_a tE=13.5 • a . • x weN[ax x a x x x IC MAX �l t---.Y e �K.•, y c•s�. - > Ya� owouax III _.�. rx 1 •. CMS O N C■�1ap pN5TA11 SILT FENCE PLONG Izvemsor J -13.46 !CLEARING L1MIR) ) 0.7 • BLF CBDRN-J TE GUA o ■ HYtt+�iii _ 3E=135 � •-IE--t6.]1]\\ 01 II e, tE.Latnc ed!.�e�0.. It`B (✓�.a�I■ TE=3B2eY a l q�� n [E=16./5,//,# II \�I, - IIIIII... , a eAg6 ill. l • 11LF 12'LPEPe'5X m imin/� I . / I • I RD H[GH NA II I M1• p' '° CTEa20. 4100 CHYIS M1�c� �.1BM --I_ CHY2S /- c Vero re q .a[s� I itlry TE'el TOP OF PRELOAD TENA65 E • II6 I �CONSMNn SOLE 1YCPEP00.5X111 'lilt I � �m II u ryo W� 11 = J 'Li . ..'-' . — . _ . — . — — ' ' — • — . — . — . — . . — . . — . — . —� io91�a — — — w�yxa. MArcH Ex;.c DOVE SIDEWALK c•aee.s vtinece Pe°e ice z,te .e r.. ILnOgI .T7Y P B IOSVE'ALE DIN,•ENSI3S II project title: ' �: C R R/V� mW B/S AE aa ra r orp° epce me.ee ra ea�e.t m \ AR 20'M 15I NAAJARlRlS(IN ,,..1, DEVELOPED BY: i BERCRNARK®r LO®Q4fRIF CORP. t :_a. . FOR &YOUNKER NEV N g Bx isr a ce. VALK i' O1 5020 1415WAAVE S.E. r BELLEVUE. 96066 :„.„.,,r,,,,,...„,,...;. a.i't ae<ne atrf•rpexle I iG T , I GRADING & TESL PLAN 4]�6D55 2HnV 0 i•�-0 xnTEpE F 6�9 vl0p iCLLS SKIS/ W WA 2WIV� g 3N�IVJ 3H6V W1V / sheet title' T `u • I2H�1V ROCKERY,/ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: u s �EwN _ SEE DETAIL GROOM a MSC PUN 302305 85 PORN 1/2 OF N 1/2 OF N 1/2 OF y/ TRExcx BIOSWALE O 6 1/2 c SW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF PSH g5 I1}� i[alnC w e ev Ix A AS PER AI10/5 9889 k E OF 02ND AVE 5 z r.!6. "" `M, _ ° 1•=5•_p• • VICINITY MAP: I \ FF"'-�r Construction Sequence: riou rnaB,c MATER:E ~N ^. vx 1.Arrange and attend preconstruction muting I I I �mm r` YL• with the city of Renton Inspector. 2 Flag cleanng limits ——— n Ul'}� rpapK or Eouly NE Access 3.Install filter fence. 25 \ • Roro 4.Install construction entrance. Sl 1\ 1 - sa PLAN 5.Install sedimentation traps. •' _ 6.Grade site. ^��W�O^O �a �� Y _ �.J 1 'n NC SURFACE. rnsRlc ex- - a I° mae.n..<n rUea.a.ot�ae sIe a roe rx awr° zxo.e 7.install storm drain system and utilities. NP sheet Ile rf�' cr' e"'9- 8.provide catch basin protection,as required. ith - -- „eteXe a ut treaea n o i.�awct.gneaorapy eaa..Y'=s�.-e 9.5eedpr surfacedsWrbed areas. draw i € '/ _ 11 Cleancutama fences stormdrainsystem //mir�l {I z Tne nuww e.atntan° 1 Removes tfenccsarter saehasbeen checked V� II oK ,l 1 9 I� ®� / SILT FENCE LOST-UC JION:.ENTRANCE'. stieb,lz.and the City'sina inspector has GTE:ALL PRELOAD WORKSHALL COMPLY approved the removal ---SelITH GeorecHY1CAL t3EP..ORr.G date 5-as-95 NTS .._..d. ..._ rs;NTS.: - 1 1 • LOG.architects Unardlo ded9n group.ar22100tn 1212 dexter o.V.M.n silts 200 m9ttb.WA.88102(200)263-4704 NAfurA/pr'Ca w///rr/ryln L1 Al Yui'1Xx!! I '+ GuW lle x5T 2 OG nwx/ I . t a �art ® "ra/ . . . ae + • / - - - - - Seed aft arras-dgfurDLd du/ine 1 EXISTS DITCH 1 ROCKERY t �o /Gp/.rf/uGr/G3�OF rLZffLrJJ. 41NL MAX 1\ 1.nemn.r1 • _s7s_,rNAs_ ..__ a_a ,0621 ei1,E04b,� _hatda.e2 -�n r.,s/ •142641Yls6'2418'204.•nsiitmau d.i eadf _r._�-uRl'_48.,21 sa��l%r .-—__1114), \ ` WrIP - ��/ - consultants CJ _f I (_ .. _, _••,..\\ < ,. . , ,.. , ....„ ,. . • KEN LONEY -J (i. aqr ron OSI.F PI DSVALE l I \ LL. lNO -. \ r.nrw,�.e...I eg.sx •I -t • project title � � mPlanm \�� PLANT LIST P ONAa yoVEcEaoEEI �f z I • Prune Os.. Sym,�7/ CR . fn / CommonNoma ``�•- P + 9 A or-rubrum '0GibGer-.a7 y Gt1c`Lr Ors/i?/2 C T'rn/, , 9''S � A., mg�; �i.ell ra Accr rzn5rum A•rixtra i/o''Arri.Cr7Lre nrrp,� 2"C61/. G t', ®n: d,,,911Lem° .. i' �O In.W.I. v 7ht(/a n/rare 'Exee o / exeerra ecerar tr'nrn. ,*.',," MI MOEDA n(>Qo DEVELOMtE ��.,N ii►I %V 0 94 Ph7t7n41,yrabm /�:s,anece y/.o//na s,}a/en GPOON OCOYER SPACING DETAIL .2wondon Wkeu O .� eUGYI�'n/A(ara>ri Ca71G.xYlJ'/ Cal'n.2=r bumirf,- Joe Triangularspeing somelyddven 0vo peAcrf S a,r, 0 LANDSCAPE PLAN "0o-am� g�4.S.bro., 42 rrunu( 'Orr,I.a1 T'/ rlriv Lagoa?/aur4/ 2/amn. I•.2D•-rr lb./Lola. ® Aretorto ly/aq titre-a i / L'//7/7e-e/nn/4A. 9°�rs 74,O.G, rwrbaw, pn,ne end S•OC.'llYd (aa141'7 Owen bandxa =9I7S'tlb PAPA I Uncle.pmmmgm ITOKI,WA Concocted ono 6 mina 9 mimt!III I ��q47 Tr�i phq /91f7FG/!9 / carrads ?axis za"o.G. _ • w .mnub0 - ICI a�em.ed.! sheet title 0wmug0y.leant RI. =)I Plannmmmenlenth mice p APIE Pp TREE PLANTING DETAIL • SNRUR PLANTING DETAIL NOTES 1. sutgraaee,including berms,to within 1/10ch foot provided by general contractor unless otherwise n tad. 2. Subgrade shall be scarified or rotetilled if conditions re irs. depth topsoil in all planting areas. 4. 2e depth flnegrade bark mulch In all planting beds. 5. All plant materiel shall be healthy,full and confom to BSA standard for n ae t ry stock,latest edition. 6. Plant material v size t or kind n available may b substituted 22yr with approval Oflandsupe architect or na rerInons data 7. All mess plantings shall have triangular spacing. 8. All tee pica.hell be inspected to insure proper drainage. Ico R. cheat n d'S. Positive drainage shall be maintained. Mou planting areas minimum 12 Sb 10. mbe aM treed minimum 42.from curb for car overhang drew erk hops n tad. '- building.b8°wide uildingbark waving a rep whore lawn is adjacent to docked fl S a CI 32. Landscape contractor a maintainsite anal final inspection and acceptance nce by avner.r. date,6-2C _98 1 LOG.architects METAL ROLL-UP DOOR Anardb 3edcn prpep.6,06.66 e 1'INSUL TINTED GLASS REVEALS 1310 dater eve.n d e 230 T ® METAL COPING(PONT) CONC LILT-UP(PONT)\/7/ � p � � a1tb.WA.BB)OD(20e)283-4764 T T T • iii---ii-ai _ - ` I I I I III III I I I I■■■■■■11•■WI■.11..'N.■■I U_nn�n�_U ,�.erzrar. -1 -r-i r i iii�1ii�i SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION SCALE 1/16-1'-0' SCALE I/I6-I'-Br consultants METAL ROLL-UP DOOR r INSUL TINTED GLASS METAL COPING(PAINT) Q Q-Q REVEAL Q 0 T 0 T Q Q Q Q CONC TILT-UP(PAINT) 111 11 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 _ ,- I III --r--rn- I/ I/ - ill NORTH ELEVATION • WEST ELEVATION SCALE 1/16-1'-0' SCALE I/16-1'-6 0 O 0 0 0 O O MEZZANINE ABOVE O O project ttlW Ir. PRIPMED: 5 AT A5 25' )5' t]' S5' Sfl' 4�.[EPlIPO].d AUTOIuOPf03 OOP 5 O 'S I I I I z r/ I I 4 DEVELOPED BY: I / n Fen IFUS1ONDA®L O S MASSER I€�OOAP. I •> sheet title I FLOOD RaA�APB�n IsvAZ�A ///4 P JI1 -D o • 1 na roO*Ra date 0 FLOOR PLAN • lobr. d,eetDp SCALE 1/16-1'-0' draw . checked A-2 date s-xv-ss .A a L • . 1 1 LDG.architects 1 antardbx detelon group.eunx1.6•010 1.1.0 clemtet-0.ve..rt suite.2E10 matt..WA.106000(200)283-4704 0 A,---____\/_..................._,_ I ..'s•WAL.rai..7.11.... 7,.............,..6.,,,,,.... EXISTS MIDI/. .,,,,,,,.....„..",.......... .,...........,,,,..,..... s slig..2.73,...7 .en''''''mots.'.c'°•=4., x 7'CAW V LOVI,,ERS; — — ,,_._x • • • X x •a , Y ,8 ...— .OR• Mt, . ,g N ArJefl,I .., If : --- "-"....----- -----' dr \:..... ... .. ,,k -44 I I '-------------- \I.3 .... ‘III 1 I s. • • .. • — ..... 105' IIIA\ YL consultants 0 t2 111111.111V ' M 0, )._ R SIDEWALK AND DRIVEWAY I I I I K . 609,5, L..., • , ''.. NEW DRIVEWAY — \ 1 8 0,MEET COY SMS ili< all)‘) > .'... 6 i la i v7 ri PROPOSED BLDG 2 , v) "' • 127. 10.080 SF • , 24. ,,,,,..........4s. .. 50 SF t •. a5 AdANI ! \ •, 232' VIIIII i .1 , 1...I i 1— , . '4411111„ Wilk 1 NEW MEW , A.,'LIL . _ . _.,5, . _ . _ . _ 1 , ______._ ASI,K, TO MATCH ISC•G project title FROMM EYISTIG SIDEWALK --0 REM=AUTONOTIVIE CENTER.7..........„,,,.........------" \_.__----- . .17 DEVELOPER BY: EIEGACHINARK DEVFLOPEENT CORIP. . 4 • akt St.r. 0 SITE PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION: eto 120-0r 302305 85 POR N 1/2 OF N 1/2 OFHN 1/2 L OF iasIsra:sz 7,Jisvu:A,Ps RENON.WA .rt sheet title VICINITY MAP: WE PURI STATISTICS: 'F---it,-, •. e_e *.,••• -v-44-0- .ZONE: CA vt,, ,. -.%4.-it' 9!,)::: ,.. SITE AREA: 1.77 ACRES IMPERVIOUS AREA: 1.285 ACRES -..:,..--„4....l' lir. BUILDING AREA: 16.430 SF(GROUND F.) 3,000 SF(2ND FIR) ilFic:).„f,i. 1 , TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 19,430 SF I 1 p ' PARKING BROODED: 88 STALLS PARKING ROOT: 56 STALLS(16,430/600)6-3,000/200) pp— :r. : ,11111 z...:,-, COVERAGE: ill ,- '--AMI,INTERIOR PKG LOT LANDSCAPING: 1070 SF PKG UNDSCAPING REM): 39.5666.0543,977 SF I )', -- ../,.; ALL OTHER LANDSCAPING: S.300 SF ;-.Z.E'a.,:"..2i; 'BUILDING HEIGHT PROPOSED: DIRECT . BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED: 25 FEET I. SETBACKS PROPOSED: STREET/FRONT YARD SETBACKS-15 FEET REAR/SIDE YARD SETBACKS-NONE SETBACKS REQUIRED: STREET/FRONT YAFtD SETBACKS-15 FEET i! 25 :,'. il. \ _f WI _.-.. no revisions deo RE./SIDE YARD SETBACKS-NONE I, --,',."1'( I, F- job no s heet no LDLIFE IANDSCAPING ROOD77,101,02-1,562 SF PROVIDED: 11.500 SF F." F.F. FF o i),r,,,,, 1 -- - --' ars. checked A-9 .! ......• ; / 1 :;;._ : . 1 " .'. ;' er---7 i A . 1 3C..,..P r: 4.;....1.i':.:1,;\ ''',---, i:',:1!", r•--.; 2I....-•: ::.-, . 1??.',,-.,:'--. . .,•f.,:-.'!. 1: ..,.--.•-• ; ':.'''-,i.'11 , ertl;:d v•-:,•-- ill g':,.-.,;; %-i !4 1-_-..:::-1;: -. k - . 4;:•-•z.-77.:•• ir. i AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Jessica Bora , being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the , VALLEY DAILY NEWS ' 600 S. Washington Kent, WA. 98032 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL a daily newspaper published six (6) times week. Said newspaper is a legal DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six RENTON, WASHINGTON months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the The Environmental Review Committee English language continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Wash- (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- ington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper by order Significance-Mitigated rit the following Renton non jest under the authority of the Fenton of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. Municipal Code. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Valley Daily News RENTON AUTOMOTIVE CENTER and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers LUProposal to construct PP 9 Y Proposal construct a one-story building during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a totaling 16,430 SF with a 3,000 SF mezza- nine. The building would be used for an Notice of Env D e t automotive center, with an office on the mezzanine level. Proposal would include 88 parking stalls. A new stormwater facility, landscaping and asphalt parking areas would be constructed for the proposed pro- was 8_9 6 ject. Location: 3000 East Valley Hwy. was published on The 15 day comment/14 day appeal peri- od for this project will run concurrently and The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoin publication is the sum of end at 5:00 p.m. on July 23, 1996.Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures $ imposed by the City of Renton's Environ- 44 .9 2 mental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third ��^Y Floor, Municipal Building,Renton,Washing- ton 98055. Phone:235-2550.You should be + L gal Clerk, Valley D Ily News prepared to make specific factual objec- tions. Published in the Valley Daily News July -clay�/ V}.{�� Subscribed and sworn before me this ofCCI-T c 8, 1996. 1795 19 I _ticzjdziz :h_____ 121.ateil !o `N�;*5S10N F4-A ,4, Notary Public or the State of W shington tt ;4' `-TAR �'Po.' ' un residing at i :v �U y �': King County, Washington PUBL\G �:= 1 ��0liviaed 7/92 p�,�Q 91F ...... f w k5•� �0 0 Washington State Northwest Region Department of Transportation Sid Morrison Secretary of Transportation DATE: July 29,1996 RECEIVED TO: Peter Rosen AUG 0 2 1996 City of Renton, Project Manager UEVELOf'MN t PLANNING 200 Mill Avenue South CITY OF RENTON Renton WA 98055 Subject: SR 167 MP 24.77 CS 1766 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance-Renton Automotive Center File No. LUA-96-066,SA,ECF FROM: Robert A. Josephson, PE, Manager of Planning & Local P g Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North, MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review the project which, is located at 3000 East Valley Highway . Our response is checked below: X We have reviewed this subject document and have no further comments. The project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. However,we would like the opportunity to review the hydraulics plans calculations to see if there are any impacts on the SR 167 drainage system. The State recommends that a traffic study be prepared to analyze the state intersections that are impacted by ten or more of the project's generated peak hour trips and also determine what mitigation measures, if any would be required. If you have any questions, please contact Don Hurter at 440-4664 or Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section VEE:vee F4. yn • CIT s_r OF RENTON "LL' Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator I , July 25,.1996 • _ I " Mr. Edi Linardic . • LDG Architects 1319 Dexter Avenue North#260 . • Seattle, WA 98109 • SUBJECT: Renton Automotive Center - _ • Project No. LUA-96-066,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Linardic: . This letter is to inform you that the comment and/or appeal periods have ended for the Environmental. Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance = Mitigated for the:above-referenced - project. • No appeals were filed. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. • If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 235-2719. • For the Environmental Review Committee, • Peter Rosen a,„ Project Manager • • , FINAL.DOC 200 M�iiii Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 [�U This oaoer contains 50%recycled material.25%Dist consumer Report CITY OF RENTON & DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS Decision ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION DECISION DATE July 2, 1996 Project Name Renton Automotive Center Applicant Edi Linardic File Number LUA96-066, SA, ECF Project Manager Peter Rosen Project Description Proposal to construct a one-story building totaling 16,430 square feet with a 3,000 square foot mezzanine. The building would be used as an automotive service center with an office on the mezzanine level. The proposal includes 86 parking spaces. Improvements to the site include stormwater facilities and landscaping. Project Location 3000 East Valley Highway Exist. Bldg. Area NA Proposed New Bldg. Area' 19,430 s.f. Site Area , 1.77 acres Total Building Area 19,430 s.f. �- ---- - -• V� .Y J "caill—s. ---III--fi—� — I -- — -•— o ... F Race Ai,:.ft:ruleY Tsw t15T Sr' ~Pi°LTN � • 9 r DewuL64, I IseH s •`1' 1 m YST 2% ' 1 EVAN` � C Ylr� d• � BLACK Track, ♦♦♦♦♦♦�♦♦ ♦♦�3 I>W D 1 .' 13R0 N ST N �... ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦� < r iiu SW 23RD ST � .. JR ♦ ENfE'♦♦♦•E:aRER �=W r } � ,1 :::i' _ __ > `iaLB07 `n Ng I 3t ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦ •.� .ti m 1 IY `/r/1- ':1� P M1�^ IL'::NILOT Y H i$V16; N W W PIC.NTENHI. <; R; •I :,j; REIN TON' L 9, b< S Y �♦♦• P. ♦♦i♦�c awR%... � I 3 s2STM,ST::0 i 26TH ♦♦♦♦♦��♦1♦y �♦♦♦�6 ! .::r �" MT" f♦ ST I ♦♦♦♦O O ,i > _ ¢ I ' • 1.,.III ---- �^ R - ♦♦,♦om♦ di♦� 4 :.:.. 11\J1_��_.:•�;,.+,_—— __L_—_ f . , �t= S! w1�►♦f♦ • f`r �::• QII 9 cy r' 9 . t� 7TH T >u STRANGER BLV° SW 27111 Si � .,,� • 0 1�111.I1141617 6� i • ` �N� C S 27i'Pr °L S N Stu<i 29TH TRECK Ok=IND* cyF i42 I SITE < } ! n �♦ 5•yqt� ;EE6rH lr'- S �rQy P, O 1 I I 5w 2srH IT l , ly ayrN•ly S330T RDT Sf STIVSE{'-6sr 'O 2oTH L'r< w 26 .1 / { C �(J ST IS TT , i .-. I F a I.I cnarsr- ,VI 2t SW 31sT M >4_Sr I \ I T ® ; SI •16s AS � vt � I V 1 ( CREENSBRT ~ SM!3380 - � I 9 I VC Ra RATE II L�I PK 21 > ST > I CC ' xx 3 SE 1N,'H ST I OR N I I I I I• e L FS 3 10 W I Sw 3JrH Sr ® i • S I72YD ST \ _SE 1T2N0 ST CORR RATE I I __9a NIHXLER BIND it I 1 > ) I' II o �e • .�COMMUN/TY-,LAAIO-0a — . —— CI� T 3——3— --F j `�" .4� •{� ' E_l7]RCI S I E �NCY ICC � < "'iiti S InTH ST S 7arH sIf 11 /I I/1 1 I O Sw a<3978 ST I T I#! I N el, "s SE I78TH ST I 0 111 +,-rr I I < 1 I w N \� s Lc. I SA7(ONI;OR m t7 Sw 61ST , ST VALLEYS 177TN Si TRtION R I( N > 1 I IEO/GL 110ZH CP•P r 1 4� }I _ > > 1 I CENTER O S 4 sr I} >0�I V6 I A a I . = $=,T9TH Sr C - m ¢ F I I �,. �i E _ D, I III teorH r- �i I SW R I d3Ro ST I i P .; j .!. I I sEOAL°PARK 3 Z© 181ST ST S 1180TH j..—.., ST ` I-1._--c—a RILE S„ LL 15YC _ c•::3J%i L I xi I • S45TR —__1 _N slnc r`trF'i `R ` j1� I k� I m31 Q 36 I ,y SETH 0% 32 or ST Wit' }T1 OI .•s_? M�T__ I I $ I EV I ° SE 187TH ST SE team Lit ea 8 3.Lrr,,��AASER�I > y m} y SE: ORO t a -sr 3 ° 187TN ST I I= S 188TH ST 4 S I0TM ST ° j S 187TH I I' I I I 11 I I �~ ELI r 1 D VISE Bsr11 •yPISCO'. • .. ° `1 a. I m '.r I 1 I= gr. 1 PL .ME•1NO R•'. 2 uI _ �l a �S� _ I I ,y-� . sr at S /SOTH sr s t TH sr j I IO SE 190 ST- S I90rN ti 1 •� �---�.. SE 1vorH x J \.'•..' ..I _ .,I I!Es! 1 SE ISOTH 5r sr SE '.70r1.PL ? . City of Renton PBB/PW Department Environmental Deterr....._..Jn&Administrative Land Use Action Renton 'Automotive Center LUA-96-066,SA,ECF Report and Decision of July 3,1996 Page 2 of 14 Part One: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The proposed project is to construct a one-story building totaling 16,430 square feet with a 3,000 square foot mezzanine. The building would be used as an automotive service center. The main tenant would be Auto Trim Design, a business which tints windows, installs skylights, stripes bumpers, etc. Other building tenants may include auto detailing and car stereo installation uses. An office would occupy the mezzanine level. The building would be constructed of concrete tilt-up walls and wood roof. The proposal includes 86 parking spaces for customer/employee parking and for parking serviced vehicles. The parking is located along the north side and rear of the proposed building. The project would be accessed via two driveway cuts off East Valley Road. The driveway cuts are located towards the north and south property boundaries, approximately 90 feet apart. There are existing drainage ditches along the north and east property boundaries. The banks of the drainage ditches are vegetated and the slopes are approximately 2:1. The project proposes a rockery along the slopes of the drainage ditches which border the development. The other bank would remain undisturbed native vegetation. The proposed stormwater system is located in the east portion of the site, to the rear of the building. The system is designed to treat runoff from impervious surfaces subject to vehicular use through a bioswale and then detain stormwater quantities before release into the City system. Part Two: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW A. Environmental Impacts ' The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1) Earth Impacts: The site is generally flat, With the average slopes across the site at less than 1%. However, the slopes of the drainage ditches are.approximately 20%. Approximately 2,500 cubic yards of soil would be imported to the site for structural fill and a parking area sub-base. The applicant has not provided information concerning the source of the fill material. Because the site is essentially flat (except for the drainage ditch slopes), it is anticipated that any erosion would be minor and potential impacts mitigated through temporary erosion and siltation control measures implemented during construction. City Codes require the applicant to provide a Construction Mitigation Plan and a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) prior to the issuance of a Construction Permit. Mitigation Measures: Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. Policy Nexus SEPA Ordinance ' 2) Air Impacts: Construction activity would result in increased levels of airborne particulates (especially dust) potentially impacting local air quality in the area of the project site. Emissions from construction equipment would have a minor impact on local air quality. Construction impacts would be short term in nature and SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/BB/PW Department - Environmental Detern::.._...m 8 Administrative Land Use Action Renton Automotive Center LUA-96-066,SA,ECF Report and Decision of July 3,1996 Page 3 of 14 would be regulated through best management practices of the required TESCP and with the Construction Mitigation Plan. Vehicle emissions are regulated by the State of Washington. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus NA 3) Water Impacts: There are existing drainage ditches along the north and east property lines. The ditches have seasonal water and wetland vegetation. The Wetlands Management Ordinance (Chapter 32) specifically excludes drainage ditches from wetland regulations. The project would mostly avoid the drainage ditches, though a portion of the north ditch is proposed to be culverted. The proposed project would result in impervious surface coverage of approximately 72% of the site area. Runoff from newly paved areas subject to vehicular traffic will be treated by a biofiltration swale. The stormwater system would be designed to detain runoff on-site and to provide release rates approximating the existing peak runoff rates. The stormwater detention and water quality system will be required to be designed in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual adopted by the City of Renton. Mitigation_Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus NA 4) Fire Protection Impacts: The proposal would add new construction to the City which would potentially impact the City's Fire department. A Fire Mitigation Fee would apply to all new construction. The fee has been estimated at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. For the proposed development the fee is tentatively estimated at$10,103.60 (19,430 square feet x$0.52 = $10,103.60). The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable at the time that Building Permits are issued. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at$10,103.60 (19,430 square feet x $0.52 = $10,103.60). ). The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Policy Nexus: Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting Ordinance, SEPA Ordinance. 5) Transportation Impacts: The project site would be accessed via two driveway cuts off East Valley Road. The driveway cuts would be towards the north and south property boundaries, approximately 90 feet apart. The proposal would result in increased vehicular tips that would impact the City's road system. The applicant estimates that the proposal would result in 40 peak hour (p.m.) trips. The City of Renton has adopted a uniform transportation impact fee for the entire City. The ordinance requires a fee of$75.00 per each new average daily trip end. Based on the ITE Manual, Plan Review estimates 135.43 average daily trips would result with the proposal, resulting in a transportation mitigation fee of$10,157.03. The ITE estimate would apply unless a traffic study prepared by the applicant yields a different result and the City concurs with the report. The traffic mitigation fee will finalized and the fee paid prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. The applicant proposes to import approximately 2,500 cubic yards of structural fill to prepare the site for development. This would require approximately 125 truck trips to import the material to the site. This number of truck trips is not anticipated to have a significant impact on the area roadways as the roads are already designed for heavy truck traffic in the surrounding commercial/industrial area. The truck traffic SITERC.DOC City of Renton PBB/PW Department Environmental Detem n&Administrative Land Use Action Renton Automotive Center LUA-96-066,SA,ECF Report and Decision of July 3,1996 Page 4 of 14 could impact traffic flows is occurring during AM or PM peak traffic flows. Therefore, construction-related traffic for grading and filling operations should be limited to off-peak hours. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee at a rate of$75.00 per average daily trip attributed to the project. The fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of Building Permits. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. Policy Nexus Traffic Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting Ordinance, SEPA Ordinance. B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNA with 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period with Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee at a rate of$75.00 per average daily trip attributed to the project. The fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at$10,103.60 (19,430 square feet x$0.52 = $10,103.60). The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/BB/PW Department Environmental Deterrr • . in&Administrative Land Use Action Renton Automotive Center LUA-96-066,SA,ECF Report and Decision of July 3,1996 Page 5 of 14 Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only,they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING: Policy-related Comments: 1. Preload requires a separate permit to be supervised by the soils engineer. Code-related Comments: 1. Footing excavations to be approved by the soils engineer prior to placement of concrete. 2. Comply with the soils report for slabs on grade. PLAN REVIEW: Existing Conditions WATER-Supplied by City of Renton. A 12"water main is available in East Valley Road adjacent to this site. SEWER-Supplied by City of Renton. A 8"sewer main is available in East Valley Road adjacent to this site. STORM--A large drainage channel runs across site connecting to 30" public storm sewer main in East Valley road. This 30"storm main runs to the north to SW 23rd St,where it discharges to a drainage channel that runs west to Springbrook Creek. STREETS- East Valley Road is improved with full paving, curbs, gutters and street lighting. There is no sidewalk adjacent to this site. There are sidewalks located north and south of this site. Code Requirements WATER 1. A water main must be constructed around the building, since the fire flow requirement exceeds 2500 gpm. The water main loop must be a 10"water main. 2. Fire service and hydrants shall comply with City of Renton Standards. SANITARY SEWER 1. A private side sewer is required to connect the new building to the sewer main in East Valley Road. The service bays will require floor drains connected to the sanitary sewer via a oil/water separator. No sewer main extension required for this project. SURFACE WATER 1. The applicant has submitted a preliminary drainage plan and drainage report for this project. The drainage plan includes the required detention and water quality features for this size project. The Plan Review Section has reviewed and approved the preliminary plan and report as submitted. TRANSPORTATION 1. A Traffic Mitigation Fee of$10,157.03 will be due prior to issuance of the building permit (see separate fee calculation sheet). 2. A new concrete sidewalk will be required along East Valley Road adjacent to the site. This sidewalk will match the location and width of the existing sidewalks north and south of the site. PLAN REVIEW- GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to issuing a check. SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/BB/PW Department Environmental Detern...._.--n&Administrative Land Use Action Renton Automotive Center LUA-96-066,SA,ECF Report and Decision of July 3,1996 Page 6 of 14 Recommended Conditions 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 2. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to between 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3. At the request of the Surface Water Utility, the existing drainage channel along the north side of the property should remain an open drainage channel. FIRE: 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 3,250 gpm. Four fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the proposed stricture and three fire hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 2. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 3. The Fire Department apparatus access around the building appears adequate. 4. Separate plans and permits are required for spray paint booths. 5. The applicant shall submit a completed Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement. POLICE: 10.05 police calls estimated annually, based on the size of the building. During the construction phase, building materials will need to be secured when not in use, in order to minimize theft, burglary and vandalism. Police Department recommends fencing in any building materials left on the site after hours and using security lighting. An inventory list needsto be maintained of all tools, in the event of theft. The business itself will need security lighting in the parking lots and around the perimeter and heavy-duty dead bolt locks to help deter burglaries. PARKS: The property owner is responsible for maintaining the landscape improvements outside the property line. SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/BB/PW Department Environmental Detern_______=n&Administrative Land Use Action Renton Automotive Center LUA-96-066,SA,ECF Report and Decision of July 3,1996 Page 7 of 14 Part Three: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION Report & Decision A. Type of Land Use Action X Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade&Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1:Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2:Drawing No. 1, Site Plan (Received May 29, 1996). Exhibit No. 3:Drawing No. 2, Grading and TESCP (Received May 29, 1996). Exhibit No. 4:Drawing No. 3, Landscape Plan (Received May 29, 1996). Exhibit No. 5:Drawing No. 4, Floor Plan and Elevation (Received May 29, 1996). Exhibit No. 6:Drawing No. 5, Neighborhood Map (Received May 29, 1996). C. Consistency with Site Plan Review Criteria: In reviewing the proposal with respect to the Site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-31-33(D) of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following Issues have been identified by City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers: 1) CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS AND POLICIES: The Comprehensive Plan designation for the project site is Employment Area - Commercial (EAC). Land uses intended for the EAC designation are those that require large amounts of land and high visibility and access to large volumes of automobile traffic (Objective LU-AA). The proposed use is consistent with the primary uses intended for the designation. The proposal is consistent with the following policies. Redevelopment of Employment Areas is preferred over expansion of the areas (Policy LU-176). The parking area is adequately landscaped to reduce visual impacts (Policy LU-174). The proposal provides for internal circulation among adjacent parcels and uses (Policy LU-170). The proposal includes a 15 foot wide vegetation strip to buffer the use from SR 167 (Policy LU-182). 2) CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS: The project site is located in Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation. The CA zone provides for a wide variety of retail sales and personal/professional services primarily oriented to automobile SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/BB/PW Department Environmental Detern n&Administrative Land Use Action Renton Automotive Center LUA-96-066,SA,ECF Report and Decision of July 3,1996 Page 8 of 14 traffic along designated arterial streets. Automobile repair and service uses are allowed as primary permitted uses in the CA zone. The proposal complies with the development standards of the CA zone. There is a landscaped front yard/street setback of 10 feet along East Valley Road. The proposed building height of 25 feet would be within the 50 foot height limit of the zone. Lot coverage is limited to 65% in the CA zone, the proposal results in 21% coverage. The Parking and Loading Ordinance sets parking standards based on the types of proposed uses. The proposal includes 16,430 square feet of auto service uses which require 1 parking space per 400 square feet and a 3,000 square foot office which requires a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 4.5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. Therefore, a minimum of 50 parking spaces and a maximum of 55 would be needed to satisfy the code requirement. The applicant has provided 86 parking spaces with the proposal, 31 spaces over the maximum number permitted. Some of the parking stalls are intended for parking vehicles which are being serviced on the site, rather than customer/employee parking. There are 32 parking spaces in the rear of the building which do not meet the stall dimension standards of the code (proposed at 8 feet wide, the code requires 8 1/2 feet wide for compact stalls). In addition, parking stalls are double stacked at the east end of the property. The applicant will need to either reduce the number of parking spaces to the maximum allowed in the code or apply in writing for a modification to parking code requirements, approved by the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department. The applicant may remove the striping of parking stalls to reduce the number if these spaces are to be used strictly for parking serviced vehicles. The proposal meets landscape requirements of the CA zone; providing a 10 foot wide landscape frontage along East Valley Road, and meeting requirements for interior and perimeter parking lot landscaping. Since the proposal is located in the Green River Valley, an additional 2% of natural landscaping is required for developed sites, per an agreement between the City and the Soil Conservation Service (SCS). The applicant is proposing to meet this requirement by leaving undisturbed the natural vegetation along the north edge of the drainage ditch along the north property boundary. Staff recommends that the applicant enhance the existing vegetation with native plantings. This enhancement should cover a minimum area of 1,542 square feet to meet the requirement for natural landscaping on 2% of the site area. The code includes a provision requiring a site obscuring landscape buffer within a 15 foot wide landscape strip, where the rear yard of properties abut State Route 167. The applicant has not indicated this landscape buffer on the landscape plan. 3) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USES: The proposal would develop a vacant lot with a land use and building which is of a similar intensity and compatible with existing properties and land uses in the surrounding area. No impacts to surrounding properties and uses are anticipated. The applicant has not provided a lighting plan for the proposal. In order to ensure that exterior lighting does not result in illumination/glare impacts onto adjacent properties, the on-site lighting should be directed inward on the site. ' 4) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE: The proposal would mostly avoid work within the existing drainage ditches along the north and east ends of the site. The project would construct rockeries on the ditch slopes along the parking areas, SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/BB/PW Department Environmental &Administrative Land Use Action Renton 'Automotive Center LUA-96-066,SA,ECF Report and Decision of July 3,1996 Page 9 of 14 for the grade transition. The other bank slope would remain as undisturbed vegetation. However, the project proposes to culvert a portion of the north drainage ditch. It is City policy to retain open drainageways where possible. This allows for more flexibility in conveying stormwater flows and the vegetated ditches provide wildlife habitat values. The applicant should work with City staff to minimize the culverting of the ditch and in sizing the culvert to convey flows. The applicant proposes leaving undisturbed the natural vegetation along the north drainage ditch to meet the natural landscape requirements for developing sites within the Green River Valley Planning Area. Staff is recommending that this area be enhanced with native plantings which would add to wildlife habitat values and mitigate development of the.site. Although the proposal would result in covering the site with impervious surfaces, proposed stormwater facilities would mitigate impacts to stormwater quality and increased runoff volumes. The site plan does not indicate a specific area to collect garbage/refuse produced on-site. A location should be shown on a revised site plan which is easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. The refuse area should be fenced or screened in accordance with City ordinances. The plan submittal does not include proposed signage. The applicant should submit an overall signage plan to be approved by the Development Services Division prior to issuance of permits for exterior building or freestanding signs. 5) CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES: The development of-the vacant site is expected to conserve or enhance area-wide property values. 6) SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION: The proposal would be accessed via 2 driveway cuts off East Valley Road. The driveway cuts would be approximately 90 feet apart which would provide sufficient distance between the driveways for traffic safety. The proposal includes adequate parking and there is good access between the parking area and the building. There is no direct pedestrian access between the sidewalk along East Valley Road and the building entry. The code requires a pedestrian connection between a public entrance and the street. The site plan should be revised to provide a direct pedestrian access. The applicant proposes building a rockery where the north edge of the parking lot goes down to the drainage ditch along the north property boundary. There would be a topographic drop of approximately 7 feet from the edge of the parking to the bottom of the ditch. To ensure safety of vehicles and pedestrians on the site, the applicant should install a guard rail along the edge of the parking. 7) PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR: The proposed building is setback from property boundaries sufficient to allow for adequate light and air to reach the building. SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/BB/PW Department - Environmental Deterr s , ;m&Administrative Land Use Action Renton Automotive Center LUA-96-066,SA,ECF Report and Decision of July 3,1996 Page 10 of 14 8) MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS: The proposed land use is not anticipated to generate noise, odors, or other harmful or unhealthy conditions. The storage and use of any hazardous materials utilized on the site would require approval of the Fire Department. 9) AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE; AND: Appropriate services and facilities are available to serve the proposed use, provided required site improvements are installed. Refer to the Advisory Notes section of this report for detailed information on public utilities and services. 10) PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT: The proposed project would improve the vacant condition of the site; adding a business use compatible with the neighborhood as well as landscape and stormwater system improvements. The development would assist in preventing neighborhood deterioration and blight. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. ' SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/BB/PW Department - Environmental Deterr._._,.jn&Administrative Land Use Action Renton Automotive Center LUA-96-066,SA,ECF Report and Decision of July 3,1996 Page 11 of 14 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now makes and enters the following: D. Findings ' 1) Request: The Applicant, Edi Linardic, has requested Environmental Review& Site Plan Approval for development of the Renton Automotive Center. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 thru 6. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Commercial. 5) -Zoning: The site plan as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Commercial Arterial zoning designation. 6) -Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include:. North: Auto towing/storage; East: SR 167; South: Equipment storage ; and West: Substation and warehouse/distribution building. E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2) Specific Land Use (e.g. Site Plan Approval) issues were raised by various City departments. These issues were addressed in the body of the report. 3) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Commercial; and the Zoning designation of Commercial Arterial. SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/BB/PW Department Environmental Deten_=_____in A.Administrative Land Use Action Renton•Automotive Center LUA-96-066,SA,ECF Report and Decision of July 3,1996 Page 12 of 14 F. Decision The Site Plan for Renton Automotive Center File No. LUA-96- 066 is approved, subject to following conditions: CONDITIONS 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall either revise the site plan to reduce the number of parking spaces to the maximum number allowed by the City's Parking and Loading Ordinance, or apply in writing and obtain approval for a modification from this parking code requirement. 2) The applicant shall attempt to eliminate the culverting and minimize the extent of the rockery necessary along the existing north drainage ditch, subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 3) The applicant shall install a guard rail between the edge of the parking lot and the drainage ditch along the north property boundary, to ensure the safety of vehicles and pedestrians. The design of the guard rail shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division and details shall be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 4) The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan to meet the requirement for natural landscaping of 2% of the site area. This natural landscape requirement could be accomplished with enhancing the drainage ditch vegetation with supplemental native plantings. The area of enhancement or other natural landscape area shall be a minimum of 1,542 square feet, or 2% of the gross site area. Plantings shall be specified by common and Latin name, with the size, location and quantity of plant materials to be used. The revised landscape plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 5) The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan indicating a 15 foot wide landscape strip that incorporates a site obscuring landscape buffer, located along the rear property boundary where the subject property abuts SR 167. The revised landscape plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 6) The applicant shall submit a lighting plan to ensure that exterior lighting does not result in an illumination/glare impact onto adjacent properties. The lighting plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 7) The applicant shall submit a revised site plan that shows a specific area to collect garbage/refuse produced on-site. The location shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. The refuse area shall be fenced or screened in accordance with City code. The revised site plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 8) The applicant shall submit a revised site plan indicating a direct pedestrian connection between the building entry and the sidewalk along East Valley Road. This may be a sidewalk or painted asphalt. The pedestrian connection shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 9) The applicant shall submit an overall signage plan to be approved by the Development Services Division prior to issuance of permits for exterior building or freestanding signs. SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/BB/PW Department Environmental Deter on 8 Administrative Land Use Action Renton.Automotive Center LUA-96-066,SA,ECF Report and Decision of July 3,1996 Page 13 of 14 DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION July 3, 1996 i SIGNAT . ES � C 7-2�fC Jams .Hanson,Zoning Adm nistrator — date 7-02 ichael D.Kattermann, ning Administrator date TRANSMITTED this 3rd day of July, 1996 to the applicant and owner: Rhonda Younker 16187 SE 33rd Circle Bellevue,WA. 98008 Edi Linardic/LDG Architects 1319 Dexter Ave. N, #260 TRANSMITTED this 3rd day of July, 1996 to the following: Bob Arthur,Land Use Inspector Jim Chandler,Building Official Art Larson,Fire Marshal Neil Watts,Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City.Attorney Valley Daily News SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/BB/PW Department Environmental Deter on 8 Administrative Land Use Action Renton.Automotive Center LUA-96-066,SA,ECF Report and Decision of July 3,1996 Page 14 of 14 Land Use Action Appeals & Requests for Reconsideration The decision on the requested administrative land use action is being made concurrently with the Environmental Determination. The administrative land use and environmental decisions will become final if the decision/decisions is not appealed within 14 days of the date of the publication. An appeal of either or both decisions must be filed within the 14 day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3);WAC 197-11-680). REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed In writing on or before July 23, 1996. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior meeting, may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen(14)days of publication. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems proper. If an appeal is made to the Hearing Examiner, requests for reconsideration will be forwarded to that office for consideration at the same time as the appeal. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 4-8-11.B, which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 p.m.on July 23, 1996. Any appeal must be accompanied by a$75.00 fee and other specific requirements. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee decision, but to all Request for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. SITERC.DOC .....:..:..:::::.::::::::.::::::::::.::M::.:::::...... ...... ..::::.::.:::::. :::::::CURRENT.pLAN NGDmSI.ON......................:.:...........................................f.............:.:._...... On the 4r°I day of Jli, , 1996, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope contain pckftri heefi al aM d Ch ec i i Sf documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing - alb ri tttchmn CiNt V\N vo oe Li,yak, s\t‘e.r- rt cf Ai em "Dav td �.��fiztnnaan � of IRa 'u,val ...-Rcsot.t Vice a n kiscv� rt o fTirew\sPc 'ataV, Sue. ^'Rwnna Cai of Sca- L uw avv�tsL 1vlklan tv c VY‘akOW , gshev,ets VAu. aclesL t lhata� �, L (Signature of Sender) E441.411 Jet Cm STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS ;COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that SA Y'N& SACS s�. signed this . !instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and Vduntary act for the uses and purposes ;mentioned in the instrument. 1Dated: C..??2.0 • Notary Public)in and Tor the State ashlogton R 8Q 1I (o4(_ /yl a& Q,tr- .5 - 1're^ = , Notary(Print) ✓t it e r I .j / � vrh c /�,e'F•r .t�tr� '�; My appointment expires ( - q "1,7 ,i e•r +ovt Aw1-O h'1oil of , C 11+c r - Nu.teber: LLAA-Vib , sf3, Ec NOTARY.DOC I • i 1/4 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-066,SA,ECF APPLICANT: MR. ED LINARDIC/LDG ARCHITECTS PROJECT NAME: RENTON AUTOMOTIVE CENTER DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a one-story building totaling 16,430 SF with a 3,000 SF mezzanine. The building would be used for an automotive center, with an office on the mezzanine level. Proposal would include 88 parking stalls. A new stormwater facility, landscaping and asphalt parking areas would be constructed for the proposed project. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3000 East Valley Highway LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton • Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 p.m. on July 23, 1996. Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. PUBLICATION DATE: July 08, 1996 DATE OF DECISION: July 02, 1996 SIGNATURES: G g Zimmerman, A inistrator DATE partment of Planning/Building/Public Works m hastain, Administrator DATE Community Service Department i,/ •Lee h eTer e ie DATE Renton Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-066,SA,ECF APPLICANT: MR. ED LINARDIC/LDG ARCHITECTS PROJECT NAME: RENTON AUTOMOTIVE CENTER DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a one-story building totaling 16,430 SF with a 3,000 SF mezzanine. The building would be used for an automotive center, with an office on the mezzanine level. Proposal would include 88 parking stalls. A new stormwater facility, landscaping and asphalt parking areas would be constructed for the proposed project. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3000 East Valley Highway MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee at a rate of$75.00 per average daily trip attributed to the project. The fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $10,103.60 (19,430 square feet x$0.52 = $10,103.60). The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The Site Plan for Renton Automotive Center File No. LUA-96-066 is approved, subject to following conditions: CONDITIONS: 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall either revise the site plan to reduce the number of parking spaces to the maximum number allowed by the City's Parking and Loading Ordinance, or apply in writing and obtain approval for a modification from this parking code requirement. 2) The applicant shall attempt to eliminate the culverting and minimize the extent of the rockery necessary along the existing north drainage ditch, subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 3) The applicant shall install a guard rail between the edge of the parking lot and the drainage ditch along the north property boundary, to ensure the safety of vehicles and pedestrians. The design of the guard rail shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division and details shall be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. MITMEAS.DOC/ I _ Renton Automotive Center - LUA-96-066,SA,ECF Mitigation Measures/Conditions (Continued) Page-2- 4) The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan to meet the requirement for natural landscaping of 2% of the site area. This natural landscape requirement could be accomplished with enhancing the drainage ditch vegetation with supplemental native plantings. The area of enhancement or other natural landscape area shall be a minimum of 1,542 square feet, or 2% of the gross site area. Plantings shall be specified by common and Latin name, with the size, location and quantity of plant materials to be used. The revised landscape plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 5) The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan indicating a 15 foot wide landscape strip that incorporates a site obscuring landscape buffer, located along the rear property boundary where the subject property abuts SR 167. The revised landscape plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 6) The applicant shall submit a lighting plan to ensure that exterior lighting does not result in an illumination/glare impact onto adjacent properties. The lighting plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 7) The applicant shall submit a revised site plan that shows a specific area to collect garbage/refuse produced on-site. The location shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. The refuse area shall be fenced or screened in accordance with City code. The revised site plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 8) The applicant shall submit a revised site plan indicating a direct pedestrian connection between the building entry and the sidewalk along East Valley Road. This may be a sidewalk or painted asphalt. The pedestrian connection shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 9) The applicant shall submit an overall signage plan to be approved by the Development Services Division prior to issuance of permits for exterior building or freestanding signs. MITMEAS.DOC/ } CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-066,SA,ECF APPLICANT: MR. ED LINARDIC/LDG ARCHITECTS PROJECT NAME: RENTON AUTOMOTIVE CENTER DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a one-story building totaling 16,430 SF with a 3,000 SF mezzanine. The building would be used for an automotive center, with an office on the mezzanine level. Proposal would include 88 parking stalls. A new stormwater facility, landscaping and asphalt parking areas would be constructed for the proposed project. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3000 East Valley Highway Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING: Policy-related Comments: 1. Preload requires a separate permit to be supervised by the soils engineer. Code-related Comments: 1. Footing excavations to be approved by the soils engineer prior to placement of concrete. 2. Comply with the soils report for slabs on grade. PLAN REVIEW: Existing Conditions WATER- Supplied by City of Renton. A 12"water main is available in East Valley Road adjacent to this site. SEWER- Supplied by City of Renton. A 8"sewer main is available in East Valley Road adjacent to this site. STORM -A large drainage channel runs across site connecting to 30" public storm sewer main in East Valley road. This 30"storm main runs to the north to SW 23rd St, where it discharges to a drainage channel that runs west to Springbrook Creek. STREETS- East Valley Road is improved with full paving, curbs, gutters and street lighting. There is no sidewalk adjacent to this site. There are sidewalks located north and south of this site. Code Requirements WATER 1. A water main must be constructed around the building, since the fire flow requirement exceeds 2500 gpm. The water main loop must be a 10"water main. 2. Fire service and hydrants shall comply with City of Renton Standards. SANITARY SEWER 1. A private side sewer is required to connect the new building to the sewer main in East Valley Road. The service bays will require floor drains connected to the sanitary sewer via a oil/water separator. No sewer main extension required for this project. ADVNOTES.DOC/ 1. RENTON AUTOMOTIVE CEIv i CR LUA-96-066,SA,ECF Advisory Notes (Continued) SURFACE WATER 1. The applicant has submitted a preliminary drainage plan and drainage report for this project. The drainage plan includes the required detention and water quality features for this size project. The Plan Review Section has reviewed and approved the preliminary plan and report as submitted. TRANSPORTATION 1. A Traffic Mitigation Fee of$10,157.03 will be due prior to issuance of the building permit (see • separate fee calculation sheet). 2. A new concrete sidewalk will be required along East Valley Road adjacent to the site. This sidewalk will match the location and width of the existing sidewalks north and south of the site. PLAN REVIEW- GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings,two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to issuing a check. Recommended Conditions 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 2. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3. At the request of the Surface Water.Utility, the existing drainage channel along the north side of the property should remain an open drainage channel. FIRE: 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 3,250 gpm. Four fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the proposed stricture and three fire hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 2. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 3. The Fire Department apparatus access around the building appears adequate. 4. Separate plans and permits are required for spray paint booths. 5. The applicant shall submit a completed Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement. POLICE: 10.05 police calls estimated annually, based on the size of the building. During the construction phase, building materials will need to be secured when not in use, in order to minimize theft, burglary and vandalism. Police Department recommends fencing in any building materials left on the site after hours and using security lighting. An inventory list needs to be maintained of all tools, in the event of theft. The business itself will need security lighting in the parking lots and around the perimeter and heavy-duty dead bolt locks to help deter burglaries. PARKS: The property owner is responsible for maintaining the landscape improvements outside the property line. ADVNOTES.DOC/ 46 „ Wit:- CITY . IF RENTON NA -4 Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 2, 1996 Mr. Edi Linardic - LDG Architects 1319 Dexter Avenue North#260 Seattle, WA 98109 SUBJECT: Renton Automotive Center. Project No. LUA-96-066,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Lindardic: This letter is written on behalf of,the Environmental Review'Committee and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on July 02,1996, decided that your project may be issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: • See enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required 15 day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals (including:the applicant) who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The required 14 day appeal period will run concurrently with the comment period. The comment/appeal period will end at 5:00 PM on July 23, 1996. - Following the end of the comment/appeal period, the .City will finalize its Determination, unless comments•received require a reevaluation. WAC 197-11-660 states that the responsibility for implementation measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of the imposed action. Since an environmental impact statement has not been prepared for this project, any mitigation measure established by the ERC not directly attributable to an identified adverse impact is deemed to be voluntarily accepted by the applicant. Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g., the Public Works Division) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended for this project, if you have specific questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. Appeal procedures and mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at 235-2719. For the Environmental Review Committee, 63a:zA Peter Rosen Project Manager • cc: Ms. Rhonda Younker/Owner Mr. James Hawk/Party of Record DNSMLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 This oaner contains 50%recycled material.25%nost consumer e 0 '' '1,.:! CITY IF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse-Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 2, 1996 Washington State • Department of Ecology • Environmental Review Section - PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 SUBJECT: Environmental Determinations . Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on July 02, 1996: • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED , RENTON AUTOMOTIVE CENTER , LUA-96-066,SA,ECF Proposal to construct a one-story building totaling 16,430 SF with a 3,000 SF mezzanine. The building would be used for an automotive center, with an office on the mezzanine level. Proposal would include 88 parking stalls. A new stormwater facility, landscaping and asphalt parking areas would be constructed for the proposed project. Location: 3000 East Valley Highway. - The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal period will end at 5:00 PM on July 23, 1996. Following the end of the comment/appeal period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. If you have questions, please call me at (206) 235-2719. For the Environmental Review Committee, 2.1&./\, Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: King County Water Pollution Control Division, Metro Department of Wildlife . Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Sue Rumery, City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Rita Perstac, Puget Power AGNCYLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 This oaoer contains 50%recycled material.25%oast consumer - i CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): • LUA-96-066,SA,ECF APPLICANT: MR. ED LINARDIC/LDG ARCHITECTS PROJECT NAME:- RENTON AUTOMOTIVE CENTER DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a one-story building totaling 16,430 SF with a 3,000 SF mezzanine. The building would be used for an automotive center, with an office on the - mezzanine level. Proposal would include 88 parking stalls. A new stormwater facility, landscaping and asphalt parking areas would be constructed for the proposed project. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL 3000 East Valley Highway MITIGATION MEASURES: - 1.• The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee at a rate of$75.00 per average daily - trip attributed to the project. The fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of Building.Permits. 2: A.construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and'a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to _ between 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m. unless approved.in advance by the Development Services , - Division. _ ' 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate.Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of • new construction. This fee is estimated at$10,103.60 (19,430 square feet x$0.52= - j $10,103.60). The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. - • The Site Plan for Renton Automotive Center File No. LUA-96-066 is approved, subject to following conditions: CONDITIONS: - 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall either revise the site plan to reduce the number of parking spaces to the maximum number allowed by the City's Parking and Loading Ordinance, or apply in writing and obtain approval for a modification from this parking code requirement. , 2) The applicant shall attempt to eliminate the culverting and minimize the extent of the rockery necessary along the existing north drainage ditch, subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 3) The applicant shall install a guard rail between the edge of the parking lot and the drainage ditch along the north property boundary, to ensure the safety of vehicles and pedestrians. The design of the guard rail shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division and details shall be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. MITMEAS.DOC/ • I � Renton Automotive Cen.:.,- LUA-96-066,SA,ECF Mitigation Measures/Conditions (Continued) Page-2- 4) The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan to meet the requirement for natural landscaping of 2% of the site area. This natural landscape requirement could be accomplished with enhancing the drainage ditch vegetation with supplemental native plantings. The area of enhancement or other natural landscape area shall be a minimum of 1,542 square feet, or 2% of the gross site area. Plantings shall be specified by common and Latin name, with the size, location and quantity of plant materials to be used. The revised landscape plan shall be subject to the approval of the _ Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 5) The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan indicating a 15 foot wide landscape strip that incorporates a site obscuring landscape buffer, located along the rear property boundary where the subject property abuts SR 167. The revised landscape plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division,prior to the issuance of building permits. - - 6) The applicant shall submit a lighting plan to ensure that exterior lighting does not result in an illumination/glare impact onto adjacent properties. The lighting plan,shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits.. 7) The applicant shall submit a revised site plan that shows a specific area to collect garbage/refuse, produced on-site. ;The location shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. The refuse area shall be fenced or screened in accordance with City code. The revised site plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. - - - . 8) The applicant shall submit a revised site plan indicating a direct pedestrian connection between the building entry and the sidewalk along East Valley Road. This may be a sidewalk or painted asphalt. The pedestrian connection shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. • 9) The applicant shall submit an overall signage plan to be approved by the Development Services Division prior to issuance of permits for exterior building or freestanding signs. MITMEAS.DOC/ CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-066,SA,ECF APPLICANT: MR. ED LINARDIC/LDG ARCHITECTS PROJECT NAME: RENTON AUTOMOTIVE CENTER DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a one-story building totaling 16,430 SF with a 3,000 SF mezzanine. The building would be used for an automotive center, with an office on the - mezzanine level. Proposal would include 88 parking stalls. A new stormwater facility, landscaping and asphalt parking areas would be constructed for the proposed project. . LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3000 East Valley Highway • Advisory Notes to Applicant < • The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only,they are not subject to the appeal _ process for environmental determinations. BUILDING, Policy-related Comments: 1. Preload requires a separate permit to be supervised by the soils engineer. • Code-related Comments: 1. Footing excavations to be approved by the soils engineer prior to placement of concrete. . 2. Comply with the soils report for slabs on grade. PLAN REVIEW: . Existing Conditions WATER- Supplied by City of Renton. A 12"water main is available in East Valley Road adjacent to this site: - SEWER- Supplied by City of Renton. A 8"sewer main is available in East Valley Road adjacent to this site. . STORM-A large drainage channel runs across site connecting to 30" public storm sewer main in East Valley road. This 30"storm main runs to the north to SW 23rd St,where it discharges to a drainage channel that runs west to Springbrook Creek. STREETS- East Valley Road is improved with full paving, curbs, gutters and street lighting. There is no sidewalk adjacent to this site. There are sidewalks located north and south of this site. Code Requirements . WATER 1. A water main must be constructed around the building, since the fire flow requirement exceeds 2500 gpm. The water main loop must be a 10"water main. 2. Fire service and hydrants shall comply with City of Renton Standards. SANITARY SEWER 1. A private side sewer is required to connect the new building to the sewer main in East Valley Road. The service bays will require floor drains connected to the sanitary sewer via a oil/water separator. No sewer main extension required for this project. ADVNOTES.DOC/ RENTON AUTOMOTIVE-%ENTER LUA-96-066,SA,ECF Advisory Notes (Continued) SURFACE WATER 1. The applicant has submitted a preliminary drainage plan and drainage report for this project. The drainage plan includes the required detention and water quality features for this size project. The Plan Review Section has reviewed and approved the preliminary plan and report as submitted. TRANSPORTATION 1. A Traffic Mitigation Fee of$10,157.03 will be due prior to issuance of the building permit (see separate fee calculation sheet). - 2. A new concrete sidewalk will be required along East Valley Road adjacent to the site. This sidewalk will match the location and width of the existing sidewalks north and south of the site. PLAN REVIEW- GENERAL • , 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. . 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings,two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate;application and apppropriate,fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to'verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to issuing a-check.: . Recommended Conditions 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 2. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to between 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3. At the request of the Surface Water Utility, the existing drainage channel along the north side of the. property should remain an open drainage channel.. • • FIRE: 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 3,250 gpm. Four fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the proposed stricture and three fire hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 2. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. • • 3. The Fire Department apparatus access around the building appears adequate. 4. Separate plans and permits are required for spray paint booths. 5. The applicant shall submit a completed Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement. POLICE: . . 10.05 police calls estimated annually, based on the size of the building. During the construction phase, building materials will need to be secured when not in use, in order to minimize theft, burglary and vandalism. Police Department recommends fencing in any building materials left on the site after hours and using security lighting. An inventory list needs to be maintained of all tools, in the event of theft. The business itself will need security lighting in the parking lots and around the perimeter and heavy-duty dead dead bolt locks to,help deter burglaries. PARKS:' The property owner is responsible for maintaining the landscape improvements outside the property line. • ADVNOTES.DOC/ N111111 ' L . •,,. "ITtirillE_ ,r---! . ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION • POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION • PROJECT NAME: RENTON AUTOMOTIVE CENTER PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-96-066,SA,ECF Proposal to construct a one-story building totaling 16,430 SF with a 3,000 SF mezzanine. The building • would be used for an automotive center,with an office on the mezzanine level. Proposal would include 88 parking stalls.A new stormwater facility,landscaping end asphalt parking areas would be constructed ' for the proposed protect.Location:3000 East Valley Highway. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. ' AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. , APPEALS OF THIS DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 500 PM, , IXXXi YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON DULY 23.1996 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM,DULY 23,1996. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. .1 ,[ a �{ I,` , I\. -- ..:r,.es-. 1:1I Y' - I ,Jji:e;•1 „n I-- 1'dliiI r.;2,:, I � rk). w:: 1t , ;: ,. 1 s . . :Intl , , A, _I,_',7_,': ..4_ ,I., 4-4,- ----': 1— -.... lti -V-— .47 ii / trig ,,�NLML. _ RE ToNI it ,. it i • 3tiyy 1 ILO Nr_ _i-- L _ -ZZ . _ ._ . .i,74144 i Isirre :_,,..ft 'tive :lt, --Ai,. . . I;laf ° l y{ I 1 .Fs _ __ a �, °&& .ays •'1 EI aOL IA p i • l I I 'VA >�.. I / :, i� 57c I. c I { 4' _ I i -• --V a fIa —t_1• — _ _r I 31 1 -- 1 J wi??, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT-235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CERTIFICATION i, Sarld_q I, al.icSdY) , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in g conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on c)[,k) S, td9(0 • Signed: SCI--fl‘1-9-, 060Wd) 1 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) . , ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) .• I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that b'/ Sel-GKSOA) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntarv;,act>1fc�ry e,uses J and purposes mentioned in the instrument. 4 ��•,'••.. • ";� o•N'��,R .�i rr, Dated: 1/�/96 , �liGC4� i a y�y NotaryP lc in and,t•' , the State tcltV41,4n'tonv, Notary (Print) M 6-4- - 3 • .A.°L�'. My appointment expires: 6/9/Q4. 'I^ t---is, NOTARY.DOC I • I I / ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: RENTON AUTOMOTIVE CENTER PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-96-066,SA,ECF Proposal to construct a one-story building totaling 16,430 SF with a 3,000 SF mezzanine. The building would be used for an automotive center,with an office on the mezzanine level. Proposal would include 88 parking stalls. A new stormwater facility,landscaping and asphalt parking areas would be constructed for the proposed project. Location: 3000 East Valley Highway. , THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. • APPEALS OF THIS DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 PM, XXX YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON JULY 23, 1996 OR APPEAL • THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM, JULY 23, 1996. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. I,`•I\ i nIDFN,,�. p0 i13 ?;^ il Q •°S4TN 5 Wf S RENTDN rILUDE GL • STD 4l5, ,\. ; fP '•{1•:?:,. I•s, •t .m r b:/ psr„ r;9 ;!t..::.:'.• B.[.sryC ERI 1l.°-,`-Ar. �. *or„ „ �I 'Z' U 1 B `:�::\ ' Ns 'as. xartN b0�! ilkV a I � ""'„ o_ li . n?y ��\'� i '�� Q ix . `�Jt 6 L 23'.-- 'I- „ it. ; fir.VVVN/' I w » '°' , — ,\ ••V''s + r i, �" a: "e • l / ` .•Hrs` FNTpR�IICN"°..... �` £ of I°Lorts'" sT. ui" .,......._ s „. Y m W I N OI ;,Y I 1 sr • _ t i�•' :..�. :: N1 iil Race1 .1: 1 I . P.'i t , D..u•'. • ;et �.. TUKuWT I\,.._. N sr�¢ I! I; I sw aET sr ;In .7 r 5 S>m4 0 ,.III al r 44-6'rr f`s 'N'I v `tea Tracks :r I K }� o y r. �; \ l � sw aaD sr _i_�?•3 Sr 'r' sn � D.$?Ngtc.1..,, ., z m 1 ''3 .. : I s 3 i�";�Is°c'�:.. �xs ;,��yeN ry EE, ma a_alE xiExxr.<;f ; I R E 1 JTO N t �r: E a ,,.;., .;F._ 1 .R,... R �ITTO�i�>L_-,i I I . sbr°,x:sr'-%�s 4 1- • eo:=_ :' I J2k11C — J .A .---,w$ x 1 1 [ tw To,sr mt;, S� STRANDS BWD ¢I� 1 ' ,� TREiS DRi NIN.,. •+•� g. 2 IS' ■ I /S' �,rt�' - Sp pTM u�r. rSr'SE en 2 I I •SW arN T i s�R� ar. I S •s N ,A 26 3{ /1 v 25� tR' \ + sr IS MST w ' IIrl$L , • y `- I`s I cxmsr. `1 Isr r ST _ ; D = sC . UKK,/n{//1, rxsm -- I 1 ® ' -I LS 1 ALA R.([,t , = wS4)RO ^� SE :Ts,ST `• 4., I %111 '< I YY .4 U. I ''�1 r rs c4. rt I .J 1 I rx sr ® > II 1s1po sr I [Ilnso ems=§4_. 'ems NINSEER OlV4 I / 1 1 rr N. 1 °,R-^s+u Do¢r--� Ft1 — — ---'rs.II_D — ; _ _.! Q � �su+rx ST i— z T 1 ' .s OCM, F jr sarx i is V VS2Sel R5 Ti i I Sx arx g W f• 'e`- I vWi �' SF I)ETN ST Y / N \i —1 pZ ! N S SCN iO4 N " _ „ I S. MST ST V 021R Ira. .,4.•ST, I g`...E' W -_IDss�val. ` I zO I ' I Q ' c(NrE: • , TN ITT 2 e -¢p = I - s 1 = sE MTH R I t 41 I_2TN II n E. s�_F I • IID { ST f, +' — 4 IIirM R.e. SED.Stt!"; ' r le„I I T $T r' �. 1 1180TH--i - 5 .l • I I I o fE it ST ST f I, _52 r INN4 --;t:7 1 1 e0 I f. .la Uhrq�l�• { —�M, I • { ; 1 31 m 321w'= ii — — GAGE .I WE ii ir { 1 i : 4' I ~ 1 - --- SEItemN •a.•ST ��?' 'i ..11101 L- f I ® 1 s„ I I ..!N sE WT.ST '.sil �-^ �ciE� J1 .+Li 's I r Tw ST ZI . tirN sr C .t ItnN I I Im1 e sr eQ S t .a, . a I W I I s[I u( . I 11 I „ I i Ig r _ sr R sil .•—•t n[r. sr �� •.�..... g I 10 4 si 190rN 5TI FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please:include:the projectNUMBER:when calling•for:proper.file identification:. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION I � ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. RENTON AUTOMOTIVE CENTER LUA-96-066,SA,ECF Proposal to construct a one-story building totaling 16,430 SF with a 3,000 SF mezzanine. The building would be used for an automotive center, with an office on the mezzanine level. Proposal would include 88 parking stalls." A new stormwater facility, landscaping and asphalt parking areas would be constructed for the proposed project. Location: 3000 East Valley Hwy. The 15 day comment/14 day appeal period for this project will run concurrently and end at 5:00 p.m. on July 23, 1996. Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Publication Date: JULY 08, 1996 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot I Oet YPZ TOe. .,:rcc.:,:r::::iF;•::{:.s•}.•},...:..rrvr:::::•:.::.;..f:•.r.•:ts.:::....:rrr�.o:::;,rr.:>•w..�.r:r�rx•,::q"ara�4i:�3%ra' ::d�'•SF• •i%x:!•�.0 ::r {:. .,Y.f.,./f+lr.{.�.�+r:�. :: v, •. ::: N:f;� .:OJ.'$r': •Yr .:�.%./i{.r},}>.'i tiY;w::ti:.,r•.;::ri.,q:•: :� .• ..i � , :. •.. :ri ...: .'J j: '� ,�• �n w{/ 7 ...f:•:irv{.r; }..r..r..rv<ry;.,:.: ..:1!-.Cr} rrW.y. a •::rr a$: '.C.:+r::r:f:.v..:.N. •::E+ ?'%' ; }rr}am� Fr .n...1. .r. Y:f.•.}:t.. r..r.:. .r...:. n.w.....;:.....+/.•::•::.rn•:v.:a+.•r:•i::•:;�::•:.:.:.1n•.•.:..::.::•.•.•;.:..i:::%:i:%::.'.!;iiii:;:i:;::;:};i:::iti:.:::"`•::;:::..:?:?:;::Y'.i:�;r;:;i:;::ii:JrY .JI:Yt. .7 Project Name /Lciitoi As.tort.6t,ve Cell-rt./- Project Address 3000 Ea St Vet/icy Road Contact Person EaL,N a ro(i L /LDG A✓e.bii tcct S Address 1314- Dextcr 4vt A) •;;F 240 Phone Number (Z o& ) - 213 - 4 7 4 4 Permit Number • L UA ab — 066 Project Description ONe- store ► 1d f'o 1 IIk1 16.'43O ctv P1 uZ a 3,000 c7.-P7 ►1.leZzliHi . Aufowtotl✓t (AZ teim ) Lorcra6cce • 2s1 pa✓k,► 4+al/S. Land Use Type: Method of Calculation: ❑ Residential ITE Trip Generation Manual Get/. L.'yk1 /'4d. C//o) ❑ Retail ❑ Traffic Study Pacie ci Z g-Non-retail 0 Other • Calculation: Pfo3et-I type matt G1ose/y otescv,bel ad /,gk,7Indwsiel /Hste4414 w.pu ,ahto►15I✓e (Gte► I t7/ wse. Kate. - 6•R7 te/15 /WI /DOo rf• Ft ( 14°--i22-----' 300o 1 (6, q7 ) 13 5. `113 f el?5 -tvy 035. 4'5) ( 475) _ 10 , 157.03 Transportation Mitigation Fee: C470, Calculated by: A e / Walt 5 Date: a-uv,t. Z7 l qq( Account Number: Date of Payment • •.. PROPERTY SERVICES FEE REVIEW #06- •0 2 7 • :; . . -----• .. -• .: El DEVELOPMENT APPLIC/C-JN REVIEW SII.P.;ET-...- •• :.._-- . CI .'PLA.. ,-.E VIE.W R.coupN,q s7.4..,.T.s. .-":-..„-f'-.-i.,i::„i4.,... ::;:..:::: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET •-•••..:-•,,,, . ... -•-- • • -- OTHER .. • ..r . • -.... • ''''•,1..:-.0re-i/4'..r.'...• ". j,....V(.0 T.'' . •.:-•.:•'• i .. •--'•-T.'i.-.'•".....,;p'l'.';...',. :.:'''4"''.',-:•...-4••-•4'.'' • . -741V.:14- .•I , ..- .: . ?,.. ...:.. -...-,, _,,f., ,..itEcEIVED FROM..„9 v..,A.i..:‘,./,--5/,4 APPLICANT:'. .•-••::'•• e-Afrirw-'L!';,' i-rirm.ov-ell-' ' Aone - • -- -- • — -.: ,'. .--,.. . -.;.-.....— ..,:-.,.,..,,:4-,,,7-4,,,,.-... , Adatey:?-i.va•••=.:•• ..••••,. • JOB ADDRESS: .-;:•aies00 • -Qv- • g47-----. •••:::. -,4-,,, ,,..s. 4.) • ,..--.,,,,:-:, •,..,.. --,••••,,•,:4-1,..-:79ff'''':-..-:-11'' - -•—• ''-'• '- " -. • -•-•.,a.',Awk1-1:-.=•'; . • ; ...../.... ......................,•• . • • • - .•,2:4•• • - '' ' .:.:"...-,-..... ''• ••••7'. ,-:::•'••-•':::• ••-''•-:".•'.:r''''''.'GREEN if-•-:".'---:c.•..- :.: •• • •• ••• ...,•,,,,•-,--.•,..:, ,..:::..--•_NATURE OF WORK:::••••••'.''' C-Wa-,114 71Z/L-f-'' '-- •-e-itiTER • . .--•• ,. „ ,,,,,_:•.-:,2....•..-.4-.-,,..,1•,;,.•.t.7q.,,,..-....,::,..,,„....1,..f:„.-.......; ••1.,••••!'!‘.4;',;.!-Ti,2•'!"..?..i,..-"_.;.•. . , • L L.' :• .El. SPECIAL;AL ASSESSMENTSAND:CONNEC 1ION FEES APP-'"iiED..."..---•.'t;•••..'-,-•:•._,:;;;;.:-..NEE6idor..iti INFORMATION:'-? El,.•':'LEGAL DEstRirnorg . -...,:::... o -- SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTIMATED ....';---,-4:.;'72';',,:..'.•,:''..:13',::-..SQUARE FOOTAGg,g,if. .i,:::.•„..:13..",:..,; 17IC INITY,ER „.!4_1AP,..jri.';•t,,,Th'i.',7.z.,i.,,-,-- -._.,... .,.,.........,!:_;CI '.•-NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF ..;,--'lI,.I.,71.4•-•:-:.`-;.•...,•--,:.••-....;.•!•..0:-.4-,ii-:••i4,ii.::yw..;;/!1:14',...FRONj,„;,.,....77tGE44.,-.1.A.,:„•,;..1•••••,.,..3; 1;1EP.,371•11.,... ...,....::,...,....li._,;ii,-±1,k:,;-1A.,..:al. g..„E.-:::.:-._.L. - ----"?'•-;•••••-': El -•-•:11ESTED.--,iY•-,-.7:*.i.,',..-44,'":;`,4,:.Isf?:',-','CI.;-:,•;NOT-VESTED.'.3';:•-•1•;.•/.-j,g,•.•;'.',59/-!'!...',....",:'.,•':••-__-::;,:;`,",..:-..'i--V-IiT,..;,'A,',1!.fi',:•.9i2,.:V1!1;•,.--,-,.,•3!•..1):,'',,,,i.e4.11.....,-,.„--?!;)...;-t,q.,6-_,FN-,-.:-,..:-..,:-4, 1,2"..,;:vit.kiL,,,:-,-.,...-,-..-,-..,-i-a_-:,..,.A.,;,-,i,..,.,-.. . 1:1 • Thia•fee- revi''eisysupersed-''..eian.-•.'dcancels- - _fee Cevie,W:i4-'1.-'1'-.;.':-,7.-'..;,•'-;;I-•'..-:;_d_i_i!.4.:di.,,'-'..,72_'.'ffi-.':,. ..;'':...:::.......,-,..-•;1...•,t,-.....• ...I:,..,:7,:'_','';.i-'1,•k-,-.1.;';';• •i;' 4.,...',„:.;.•••••,,.'••it..-... ,, ,W, ,Y;'11.3;tkV ,(•-,!:,f;- ::N",",ri7:f1;'..•?!. - ,..;-14:JRIe74T-t.' ,.... ,•:-a::;;;iwiENTPip#:(sNectto...ch•7geL:,.p',...S.,-Iv',.1,2._,;......,,,,,-,:-:, ,,a`tiaXf.—(.,,,.... '...... -2'... . L.:.4. ' 3;i2128 6' -'7•;'-'•',9 CietS 77714:j.:''!•:::'Lri:!-i.:;•4:"Z'f:- .- ---J4":;",ili:',ACiiiitd.;..Taili..i:4_,(iiii0Y.4„.X1'e,, ,;"-",44U11-,,,.-!, - , .-01•ttr., .T4-,•-?1-:--• ,.. -..-•-•!..--.'-'SUBJECT:PROPEari7 AIM.....-2-2'‘]`••• . ... ..,.., ,_ 4-44.1.i ...,Ill. r,;044-'fF4. :141.•••0',..I'f,-.'pri.:V3-75P-4".-'64frffeg•iti!, .•:--,,,..--:•.-' ;•....:•:!•';;;•7. 1'7'.:tilAi '' f '.-9.1P45; :3i.i..igt.A' g-j11-;,;AtilV.-:-:-. ,•-•_÷ .;',1,;.:'..•" -'4";)-S••'.4: ;'i'f"'•:•'!-: .•f',7•-•- ;'..f;-'4•it'f•-',Y11.iTT-1-;•A7 -x.i 21.•_:.,:'i...i'SJ-i'iv•:- ,-.7.1z1• .cyI,.--:.1.4vloi,,,j.',„,0,.,10'zii.' is.' e;intent of this ie-,:ielOPMehil'ee'Mtilisis toi Put the'developer/Owner iiiiiotic.c;fli,4.,*!,se. :TIO!.r411i. !9!/,.,pq ?5,11Ppl,!5r4Pri4 ?,?.1.1.7.. "k,,,.:4,,dmvibp,st a - the — '-' ' •'••••• ••'-'-' "" potential"-••••'"•---`••; i'hite.;iiiiiiriii.§iieniiiiehiiii iajlible if die tirrie",the COfiltitietion,pe*.is issued !used!,0.r,93!pgr.34.1;▪:. . .--.."-fr•development of the property All"quoted.fees ut,c. .,, . ,.,,,,......,.:-•.„.:--•;?,,,,...,..:.::,..,-. .:-;.;-,...; :•,•<:,„,-,, -.4=d,_ .-refirii„.„i,,)i--i-di-iiiiiteig,1.-EL.,:, .'•••'',;,'....,7:;-:•anci Off-:iiiCimP•'-`ro,"-V-•Cm*Cnts-- ',.(CCY,iiQiiiMiii•idlitilitiei,':sireeit,:!mp--fia. fees,VCiii..,e_uti:2"...,etc.)-=-TrIgg,..„e„nn,...,gimec,.liantsm.rxisficc,;p.i"ii.. t,aviui,,.,71_7,74V„.; •-:,.....,1-71?,.,,,,,-p--,.-,-,,,..1.44t.-T.4../-. •:.f•'''''''' - - '' •1:•'0, '."---•applicable Utility 1.,v.,„,...,p.„.7„-,•,.,• 1'i.‘,::71.and determined'-') .•-e.;1'1'iF.4.,.„F .,... .,.., ,;.- .;•:i.s.;,-;. ---,y.11,,,:f1.4.--:i:fY.f:,,4,.;,74'..e .' 7 ...,=:. ,._'?."•:?,'0.14.4-;04'..tillN.$4,.._,,''A';q,A•441.i'3.-1.4.??(11:i"l' ivrk'il,';•;•11.7•.i-:--i;•.4.•,Lii.liritcy-j,!i.;:', 4. g7...4f,^1:' Ak4:2f,...!`.1i,lilift%ItiLli ',4.!,.1t4,rdjltpl.;:.•:',Vi .,:ri4zEriees c7.:7 '.i,f iiii.").-e iii:iiii-i-mi rates- iii effect at time Building renniticqnstructio4.petrnicg„..;:i..'4•,;..;..-A„.... .,..,.'.': '.'Please nO• e.v.:tila these fees-f5#8*--:, !1.1!?7i:%., .t••9.c.1•1:1aPP-..1w1115/,•‘1,,s•rj•-g--%Vrit4•114';',..?•I'44,: gip's,44-4'..1.44,'-4'-'ggP4444f-P41-4)1';7•Ngqifii;*.n14,924'', 'zir..:.i...',;:.,,;;4.0. 011,4....:;`'411-4tVir-fr...-_,z..--,:...1. -Agriitr';..1,---liW,A4g.-1,,1,-61,:lki,..:•-,ir v...t.:-.:44,&:,;.•: .kvi.;,-ppiopAgr.,00.wv-4:4Pt;T...4'4'-.0.., ...-7,..5.-7:ft`Al . -1 - .-.....44. 74.0117.,k•E,A4. ,144,ASAA:;-7,1,,a.-7.-.1',1•-g/1-'%--•'•'•';•••,•••4.•:-.:41C'...' ',:o'-,"'',.."'"....-. i .' ''''..Vtia 1 •-9ra it VO T 1 r iclu d e inspection feesIsurelewer permits,-riw pe_rtnit.reesp.spc,fost„okxa.,.mir„,,,,,,,,,/t._.4.0...-4,,,,,,,,,, , .-7,-„„,,I,,,,, , s. ,..,,,▪,I:....• ....,...F.::...7,.-,..-.•i.,,,;A'.4'...:-.1 4*.e.i-,..n.5.1t4YR4-=',T ,,-A,...,..--- - •-l__: .._.`'"',*__L"..' .. _.: . -•-, .. ...,_.7,-. , ....,_,„ , n,,....„...-..1..,-•• ••••, . .^,.,''' - '-'1' ' I. pritssEssmENe ,:•-•--:.:,- '-'''.- - .- •'.7•-•:-••:--- -.--7."----,---'•-•P•m-7-----7-- --A'4: •.' --. ..r---%12;Riiikticre•:44.11CrEt4-.i. .L.i?-•:avfETHOD.ox. .e-4..,Assg..s,,.., . ,.- Lod‘,...--lAapis ''.' --•••,, ; 'SPECIAL- A' ' • '/ ift•• •7';i?,6ti.-4,12-11•*.•71,-.,,irigAr:,4„,,t 14,;...,AptialiE.Mt. •,,,"'.',Sit:,tiy,-,..-.!:sc Amr:f.e.r.----,•-• .,..-,1121,i5kris :4 ro.,, •loiii•;;'-', f:DLSTRICIS1W4. ..,. . . ro- • ••'.:•wi.P1,10,E-M.:- :114;T:iN01411cf, ," -ASS , i., •. . :1, . :41..*.bR. ,. ..j t.i44--T Otalieii7AfreeinertiiitYWATERR.,..;4144... .tkl••PAI,I—VitrifitrAS. . _le_ .01444V... : ._..itogfat3.4..Villikl. - tt•.4ZIk''Allfieteg~i: .. 1.:. ..,--''tAtitillakt.r. . , ..r...4!' -r,;,fit. *-- -..' . -..... .--....,-.....• . -,-- .- --- - - - - 44.;••,...44•••,.vou.-0,,AitArrr.:.ykii ,A1..a,Mr-,1,:irrE, •-•*t§1=-4=1:44.0 rfiliM5 3,,l-trAtergrOt.144 '-' - 1 ; - 1 MAO A.;aaftrrl Vci.• ,. :1 .9k-liticIiiiiii4grernienAlti+OWASTEWAlmtlf'l J`t- ri '''''=". 7.'1.".!I-77. : ..--•• , .4., •-•--...hre.t,mq-0711,5..opoil "--.„:-.4=0.,Attlfg .,,I•r• t•:' :L:'•-•:''•LictiitolileffAgr'eC(1101)0THER. . .' '';'AS' iMilr,-4%MralrigtVAO.Cia4gtisidii Ara",ittitgage.i4, '-tx,v. ,,u, ... . . •••-•,1Q.,,1•410,6t2-w./r7,n, ,..,....... ,, ,,,,,,..-7, ,.. 'el': -'..--••14:',.'-.,,TI-Wit. -i--i---Y,t.i.;:-,--,,„,-4,0_4,Artaf,_--,-.--,10,c•'-',,,,,%i.,-.7,4,-•(v.,v-,*- .17,,I1„,..-*.,1!,.-'••,,I,11-••;•A, 1202-,,k.,, .,',--ii',„0-,..,,,7g,-.,!zn., A.,.,,::„.1 ia,',127.!fg:11,11,7,,,,O...,,,gz,r,,,,T.z....,.: .r.,,,,,.....,..6„-,,,,,..v,:::„.,,,,,,7.,,,.at,.._,,..Itki...rm--'-,,,e..0%, law il,,,,. •.•-•,•• r.,„,,,_ .... ,..,,,,..„._„....„.„ ,..., ,..,, ,... A .,L,, . ''''''''''''• 4,,,SpiehilAs:sessment,Thstrict/WATER .... ,. .. ,_i:itit. 4.git-A. Y.W.X.:AY:A.:4.t_iliii-lo.,:_t. Ar.,_ -Rik..,...0a...,,,_.1.if..-y,g,In.33_,1,7,x....44*.,-0;pil).-..A!....isi-.;„,,,.#41;x3ftrtf_ -.....1.1mr.,,.....;::,.,..,_•,:::;44. .,„ r,,,,,..li, A,...= ••--,- '''''?Pltiflakit iA4M-121,40:rf.1,..P-ii.--1-.•:,Kv.,,N,4t.,`Iiik:K4...,. ,..,1.. . „,., __,....,... :..,. . ..fh- ,.. g1 .__....----",,... _, „..: %,..T. !,v,..1%;,.m.,13.1gr,"*,.......,;.,!,,,,;,',4: ,-62kfilibliiir_0:7 ii, r , i .. . A - ' - -,. • _ , ,,.,,,,,,„ .., „,,,,,,,,,,,,..,_,..‘.,......,_,,,,,,,,,,,,,m.,,,..,..4ti„... ..41.:42...-....71,./. ,-4_,,Iiir ,.. ,,,,, _'1•,'--.„, ,,t,,,N•.r ''' .:•••",010,A•ArtrAA/- -..0.4.1-r-frf At*PrrN, ':•r'•'-- IV14.42.44.•v•SAIRIPYWAL'74N-.4-. AW4•Fr6= ••••WA-','''.41-' ,0,,,4.t\tiagr•-st,r4Afif,?.- --•ti•ic4 4.%•40-,w,.....z4m41,4ww• --,f..--,...---.----- At: 1-Er't :-'-'1:'.1iSire'-'. Assessnient;Distiict/WASIEWATERzAild aSWIVAltrzAtatx•M 7•04'0'4••• *'"'"4•:• '-''''''-'-' n..,,f',,,,,,,,,— _ — ,..-`,,,.r4 t.,- ,ffi--m•- 1: /,' .:l'll,t,e.'`.40:1141ge v. - '•'•1'- '----- •• - ...-='-"-" t)Agiticririgittil. ,gtmggioa ligiairgw,cwi-..440;0: -A4•44. *via„,514fam.fer...,.ii.4,.„,,,,.. ,.. , „.. .V.IfiiiintifCr!riientliVIETR ,........*,,z, . - .,.. .,_,, ,. -. ,-,-... _ ._: -,-...,,,,.. ..„i.,,,v_•_,,o,.,.„.„„,..,„zip:f,vk•,m44:•tt,f,10,00.:iiwg s*--,m;.1,743,-;*iNci. "Kilatg-L`V--, p V ric " • ...ri 0,,,,,-. ..4..•.,...-,1r...1.,. ,,,ler... ,. . ft, . , M,• VIIMPrOVeligaDLCIrlet.AMOigo.... -4•` ". .. ).6kIn‘st4S,G4/71-,1,-Nr41firleSi4;=, ;.4.....'0012ERfaltilInrCALCULATEff BYtTRANSTORTATION 40*--1,3?0,4itartEl,i. 't.4. ,1••24):;'; TraffiellelleritzonesAfatcw•tannrettg-ss$A,wa. ,, - 1.• m • "a let,1440-741Z-i• -;,,,`:-.: . , • % STTM75.!,v.'P,.i r'a.7p'''P.''.s•1t..•:.;..•••,,•' ''-4'-'4 4..7.1.'''•1'‘'-','urtR.'P''r.ga—e,cv`!"75;lPr.6-Yf1 Vf'i.i',.r,•G,1i••"•7--A-1i'T.nPtIOI-N rNtVii5,i',r,,Y-.1.4 H•i+ R-Ql M.mg,iioRkii.n.t 1w.12,,";k,S3...3.',5Z3_:0.:A,•*,,•,,V'4.-i•,.P2-g.7-•i.414.v-'1,1,,-6v,''-,-!,g 4'4,,,,.L1.:•1•11.i,-,,-.:,4,1-,..:,40,1,1-,,0 :DEVEOM AA0 A M ,N,-1,`,B.,-,-1,-r4,,'1.14.-,,.1.-,0.,rn5_.,4.,t''',1'I--,M14,.....4,•a E-,4.1,,,-.,-7.0.•,qi••. "1l46.-6k•-u q‘ ;1Wft3F•t,1.e-ir-l•.s-os!.j E 5 teiCt " „ ,, T lai VxemP ii) UNeVda . SQ.:1G .x gllSig e-fm- eside-n{iil$8506ii1 .7...-'-1i-f--•.A.-.-.Ar-'.-_t4-.r..--ti--i-&'-'..M -.-•-M*-_. -,-''',.4.•I,, .-',;.,c.:%i,,,"-.4'ii•••- - ,,,,_-.7....., ,,„:. .1„••,, ..tv(47-4:,.F. ,,i e -...,,f1:47::145•4s-ttl.10A-C,ri.:gtiiitalig,e5Alfligli.1:0,V,,411-31,,•44 tc,::,._ - _ _ _ . .._ _.. _ . ., • . ,..-,r,t2,...4,S, av•r..-.1-Wri,Sp',,, ,A"' '''}''3-C'''''I'""''t'+':""21*';'''?''6i ci.,,,,V4‘1'..7. 3:11,11.1„1_,744.,6,.Le., ..... e;,p,ire Miiiille-iiiiaw'elliailiiiii$680/iiiiieiniiiiiic.4i0.1%1WY,144g4...-.44 ...h,,,,, f,t,1•2i...-.1--p, .1...y.,,,... ,,,,.1.--_. ,.. .... _. • ,.. - , _ ,,,,,,a. .. 1„... .4-7!.... '''itg•';AliiiiiiielifteiliidOlSIO/iViiitlitiffig:CD7"-orTCORrione 1r4kg_ att.i.g.t:,....taqt_*.4.44476-M4•:_c_A!:.'54:;_P-,l,!.. !t-vefiA, ._ --,,• - • .-„ ,,-..:4:--,_,-,,,_-_. . .:,,,..z. :•-,ris. .,.v- t---- ••5......-; 14-l-„T'C'"--ODIM''''-er-EigilliairStiiiilTi$0:11.3/iTipfeiZtpr oeaty-' .,..luo-ileilithan05-0:00ii3406 ;'-oli''''' .ff-xi7"[..„17,,,gra.,....1..,,A.7-,....2',40. 4.7. ii::"., yl...7_0----_3,,..:; -, ,,I.'..' -.,1.„, .,•,„'"' . '''• 'Bolng,by• • ' " s'..- -iL/F" fillit"Of'Oldeks'15'fkifrimiiiit 4i•-ifill°Si au6iiiii0-i.i4A-fiYf..-f-;1`Ki+.:Wk.t-75.-.it''.14.46 1-'1'113?•t••.-lir"P':,.te-t.,....5$41,,,40.-#,', .‘.....-V.4i•I'MAra, . .,__ •.,4: '1-...."-4-4,•t-''..$ .g'‘S Y - MD'• .-E-.,U,- •,.'-e-EO--,P-.---E--N..Tr,.'._.,'Cv. .LARGE.:Th.•qW--A,,, g• y,k...-.•- ' -' „ ,, ,_,..„-e v. ,.k .•. „r`4..! t „.V,iNr4.,,,„m..a.,c..r..,.4...r:.;•..'!,.....'„4 ;,-•,;'&:k,.i tt.:i•t,,.t.e„ic,i4,4,,,,,.‘l-ik4.,k 4z_k.......,Ii..I,. •:15,-1 ;e.w111..2.. YPdPrev. 4artra T, draid'Exemption . Never,a ,.7..i,;,.‘,1;-•,1,.g'.-•,.'i i.,.'.',,'-i',. Al..v-,',i..,-i,. •,•: .. __. _ . . .....„ .•_ ,.. , ......_.,.._.,_,1.1..,,,,..,1,1„,,,,r,,,,,,T-Rv- '-- t.---;-/P4..i.icio...Ff--•,,e;.w,i,--;!;, 0V.iie.:4-4*,....1,1*'4,..E.,1.,..''1,,•.•-•aV•:).'1.-':•.','....f.,1...!tr41,;',5,.f?,.r.,..,.-.'-'1,',ffl.,.?„.1.).-i12-'-?1,,•---...!,'1.--'-fs••••"'.'711"--&51-.``.: oi•'LI V-...'.. '''•,-7Pii- siiiklefiiiiiiIiiiiidiiitiit'dwelling‘und$58S/unit k..:- .,,.,..,,,,,,,A.•-•, -... .,...,., .. -. . ......,-.. . , ,...,,,, ..,. ,,,.6...., „4,,,,j.0.,,f,,,,_160.,,,,,,,,,i,,,,,,,..., .....,., 1-Mitibil. i'lidiiiV.dviilling. Iiint* 't• 6tthml- iiArr'irv".5'"'7'.%10tOrt:-'4'':2'1';'e',.1:270,Vg74:4r0 Iii!ERZ.tt.;;.50..Vii.: 6'.-.,: :.'re-.Akt;004.3.:Vv141S4Pv/'..',1W,-A.if.a,4,1,,.........3,, •••••fi,„ 'I',„.4--.—t.: .,:ge.,.4A..-A,I,,:-. -t. 'Al""^.'"' ' ' ''"-- :.... . .,,,„ ....._...... .. ., --.1,.',„.?".'r.'-•"'.',^•:'."?.:;`..-irt'''''.,..')i:..i:1-::4t;I:;.'ci.:1- ,'.." .".-.. --- 'Y'''..Tiqrt'4%'• q.4.e5.7.;-'19.'.'..- ,.H•ii.,';.'.....c.4; .14\5t..,..":!sf:f.,r,-...41-1.1.^.4itlflits,.-i i.s...?•,:e.',1-...•4.4,/..A.4-,....,..-. .:„.. •.'"•-•:;''APlaitinenf',Condii$350/um flint:in:CP-6i COR iiinei)eziM3:epc:..1.iJ;w4t-,..,„:„‘.,_., „.___, ....„..,,- . ... .. . .,.. . „2,..,,.,,41,,,,_ -',,•21- -1'Ti-: 0- i:a•;,777--/6-7,3-,.-2•H.: : J,:,,,,,..,,T6,,,,,;,..eir.7..;., ,g7..y,-„,,,,,,E, .;,_.,...-_-...• Commercla-1/Iiidistiiiil'$0:078/stifi•fiA'.'Property:(nor less thin$585.00YX.,4,-..,1%-4%t-,, ..,- .- ••,/ ... , -:.....,.,. L. . 1.. , , ,. i,,:,,i;f;,;71,,,41; ..,.,...,..,. , REDEVELOPMENT:CREDIVN• e-"W:.'•.,.,-,.oid.F104-)1/•reWSFloi.:..X.Abiiie'Veiii,.• 1,i,?A,i',...;P..;:-J.,...;'ili,e•-.1,. ..,...f::"?1,':,-R.:..,'-i. :,.,1,,..',F,..-,..1.:!• ....i:.:....,, . .,0, : •., .ii,•:::::::,..6,,i•v„,'..,...,...,e7;44 ....•.. ,.. Qv DEVELOPMENT CHARGgSIJRFACEWATEZ-litil.V...,11-'k'1,21.1g,:ifv'?:r?,,'„4,,i.'"'::k,W0,52$11P,„,„Ml,fc!,„,k,.,17.,:...,„i'l. -,,iic,i,•,,,'...,,,„.1/4 :P,...„P,,,iiiR...,, ,,,[..i,V.!,.?-7-44,111-..,,-74,•-:Yr.';.4. 1,-?'. s.;'_;t16.SYSTEM i'di.'11.;';''''...•;.Eil.,:"-•iii.itIsilly''TPc1"2"(1.-ed::EXii-iiiiii)%_1411. !L'A'NeVerP-ds.r...-In.l.7-'•,••S'-'i''.,,,'••:-.:............................................................................. ii,'•;•!-J.:\12;r-f\Y....4.:'fr'itit:i51i- --i-1...t,- •'€•:•,;Iii`27:!.:?:-!-3-2-.0,1'ti.: ,--•:,•4_,.7:,-... .::J."--' ''''''..'"Siriglelliiiily7r-el-ideri-il'il'an"-d-m-o-bile-ho-m'e7dw-ellin-g-Iiiiit-$385/uiiitie:TV-01,T:'il '-‘•';--:':'-ik.'•"-'•i•Cl•;:-'•-•••1;4*-1:'..!'-';',.V):-•-;•:cf.:••AVEgi-iiiY---q:4,•,0'.(-•::7.4,‘ fti.k••••:•:, .• "!•1•‘r•t•'• ,...,...,,..,*.•••.:eii, 0,, All-OtIie,i.,.t)...f.,tiger.-,.i:',ti„.„0..:;,.$„0,;:.:17„29i.,/,p1...;:rtif.Itleiv,: iiitipervi.:::::;:.,O;#5:;1.7%,...;::...'ior!...p...Ifs...?; eite,i,,,,,,,...,,,y2'...;-,X,"4:•:,..•..;'.:vi.•:•••;.',C, -,!..,z..i7.:,-...•,,:„.).0.1=i''''''''ili.00.0'.7. ..r--1'...61'.;:i1,•`..::!..,,•.'..''$.4,-;,..i.1.)'•-•.••/,...i,,--t:'11.;-_;,-7;k•J•31 ,..7;e7717.,,20..-677,41:1-'?••;9' '•.1.77:,-....r.,.,'?..,,,,,,,,,tif.!, 1....,,,•6... ' --•:.(not les. than$ ..., . .. •, . ..,...,...,..,.:,....-....., ... . .... . ,,. ••„ , doe-, a. . '• -:,•-•;:i.vflilv,, ."- • '" ' .- ';.., -'''''-"L''-'...-',.--:',''''.'‘."-11'-'•, ' ''•• PRELIMINARY TOTAL .•':$",'2 2;370. d•--- ;• .7 -• - .- '':*, :- . . .•n:;;; '::•:.;"•.:,•.;,.., •-,-...',•:-:,...,• :•.-',...-.'.::i.!'••• ''•''''''.-.'''..:';•"."'Y'-'',--.'t•:•i.-.:'.::',. ':. i . .. „,. ::.::..,_•: :..• •.,... :•••••, . ,_..,.........„,..." ....., „••, ,,,.,,_, ....„, ..„........,....,,, , .••• .,,c,•,.. . ..,,.,,,.. •_ ,,,.,..„,,,,;,:;,,,•,:'..a:i:: 1 ,'- '''' • • 7 , ' '.,A, .`-','..i,.1-7:...1-''-',--; ., . . ...,...:-...'..‘:;„,..'..,:,.,. . . ..,,,-;,',..,..,,.,-. , :, . '5,-..• c...,, -,:.,. - 1/417,..i. , •' . . . ,..,./-,,.,i,Signature of Reviewing A• only,"...... .-,-,...... •,1,.......[...,...,•. ...........,...... „,....,..•.-..::<,....,..L.....•:-..,.,:...... DATE . -,...••,...,-.-_:.:.,,.!_'--,.:•?,,-;,:c.,-;'..,,i..!iiii..,,;,... ..;•,, :::,•',• -:..,.,.,:--,:-;..,,c.,:?)7•,:...:-,..(.,_,-.-......ir..,:‘:•....,,,,s.it,id7:1,_,-,r...:.,•,......,,..;:c...,-.--. .18. .cr.,,,,:ei.r...;:...: !:. • , •---..•. :.-•,,.••-,. •••,r.t•"•,,i, ',.V.,;,...-11.: *If subject property is within an LID,it is developers responsibility to.check with the Finance Dept.for paid/tin-paid status.%:-.:••;.'.,',.,L •::• -- , :..-. -........- .,:q:...: ,. ..,.- . -: ..;**The square footage figures used are aeri-frOO:the King County Assessor's map and are approximate only -:,•:.1„,„„:,..zii...:•,2..,, (:). 1.,..,,',..-.,. ''',..•.:•%;''.';',•-;.----••-,-'•'' •-'.-•'I'':"• ;:-:'•::•-',:',°.e:hemPlatejfecappitgb•::.EFFECTIVE JuIy.16,,.. .1.9,95/Ord,No..s, 4,5..0....i,6.,4,SfY!.,!,4..s.,9.,s...!:,4,.5s2,,S,,..an,,,:a.,..4.„5:..2, 6,:;:.:,..,. .„-Flic::!,, ;...;',:i,..;•.....,/,..,..,.: ? .,,,,,I.,. . .,,,,,,s :.._•:,.i.,,,,:,....•.,.st.i .....1.t,..:'..--.;......,, •tcY.-•-:-..:::,.. -4,4.::--•-•"i_:.--.:••••,':•,:cd.e.--:m:;--::::;v:4,...: :••••••••• •••-••••• • •••.:',•1-:Y...::•-••:.';...:•,-•' ./•••••. •••••::.1. ....,'........:••,.,• ..... :.„..-...- •:.;-. ,•. • y.. • ••,.....:•'...-.... •:-....,::..,•.....,:•., : . .....,. .,....,-.:,..-.• .i:,...,g-.,,,,,,,,,-...,,..-n- -,,•:''.4.,"._=.,:---.." .•''',-.'..`-g7M,e';-'••••. •• ;-'7'''--',•-T.' • •,•A';;' '•-: ,:•'',....;.:,••• :-..,'.--,1•.•.1••;-)., :q-...;;-•-...--:-...-„:;.,40,...,,t,....-. .'-.:,rf,,,:.•;Lt.".'' . •• .------.'„••••,.;., . •--. :.:.,.., • -; • . . ,„ . ; - City of ton Department of Planning/Building/Pub; . Yorks (ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:SI (RS- .COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 19, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA96-066,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 5, 1996 PF RENT OlV...Ans APPLICANT: Edi Linardic PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Renton Automotive Center WORK ORDER NO: 78098 UN 5 799R LOCATION: 3000 East Valley Highway �‘re.vt.� > ,vIZloICI lv SITE AREA: 1.77 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 19,430 sf SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval to construct a one-story building totaling 16,430 sf with a 3,000 sf mezzanine..The building would be used for an automotive center,with an office on the mezzanine level. Proposal would include 88 parking stalls. A new stormwater facility, landscaping and asphalt parking areas would be constructed for the proposed project. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LightGlare Plants Recreation land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation B POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • • C CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ,044 Atla AAA/ tit/#f z S%6 AV /9 CC17/4004A/C, fjvij ij77161917(3 C4s,vJ,1e�i., 5�5P tr. M v r" t"k M Li t" L l 0oov�'- 5Y4-6 -mot , (1igtysi5 ./°/deg/fit Iw 2y 10 AAJ a Ic.4r61 4u c/ 5cct buy .zaAt/ / (/rc;u,. �u✓� .c , ,I°o�lern Trd / iIt% (5-7r-C . 4 /27 /ig s�j Y7 aF NOc r_put /1vfavS sc+ 6 taleC 5seeacsget fS /' /v/ 7� cowdltc�"l3U/4 /4' 70 6X/rr74,4 �///4 �}/ry 'L4,ey:7 ve4u-ie ' Ae'€ll(Ct 8i S iiu. Kegoi•2�E tit /1P,/}frvj .r0�l4,6<r ?v SAAJ v- " s6,�u Val ®r-/c"4ri �'��'f�%�9?�1� 4 stu'Z#� (5oe 1 / �S efF gc),07e Pb 59,�-�'/ O>G / �"lb 7,4 C 5"l w r L( lye civ,,u We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. • - / e.. /14,de.4".T--- % Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 i I ' ' V City o;,_, iton Department of Planning/Building/Pu, ,__'Vorks 1ENVIRONMENTAL It DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:ljajAS y - COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 19, 1996 cry).or RENTON APPLICATION NO: LUA96-066,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 5, 1996 P'.,; Fi(as' 0 1 APPLICANT: Edi Linardic PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen - ®5 1996 PROJECT TITLE: Renton Automotive Center WORK ORDER NO: 78098 LOCATION: 3000 East Valley Highway &'.M.-L/001 i..nVISION SITE AREA: 1.77 acres - I'BUILDING AREA(gross): 19,430 sf SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval to construct a one-story building totaling 16,430 sf with a3,000 sf mezzanirie..The building would be used for an automotive center,with an office on the mezzanine level. Proposal would include 88 parking stalls. A new stormwater facility, landscaping and asphalt parking areas would be constructed for the proposed project. • Ai ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary . Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glara Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C: CODE:RELATED COMMENTS cfietler,z-"j2Ii ft a vtoi,d#V/S Air? /AI /064 Ce £j v1/d'f / •i . ,6d1 r/2. ,4 My 5T44eAiT s %d 44t4& Thh� /ifca' e�" N',e®S, — -Tg/9 /C ,'t 1776 AT(a� c., a!� 1 75; / 'T2ii /N ov F rl/c S/7-t I /C, 4-- ,g!L / & // A s -A-C-L ; il-/ C 57-vg /144 g�• ('t'6 7-v -4� -O L-/c/ A O7 4 A-m// P z �d4Vj -We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. leee--,..,-Pf-i."-e.ea--- 6 --VA- orAuthorized Representative Date Signature of Director p DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 I \ 4. l • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ?(av, �eVI�W - W y, COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 19, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA96-066,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 5, 1996 CITY nF RFArTC)N APPLICANT: Edi Linardic PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Renton Automotive Center WORK ORDER NO: 78098 JUN 0 7 1996 LOCATION: 3000 East Valley Highway BUiLUIINIG lie v do3jg4 SITE AREA: 1.77 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 19,430 sf SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval to construct a one-story building totaling 16,430 sf with a 3,000 sf mezzanine..The building would be used for an automotive center, with an office on the mezzanine level. Proposal would include 88 parking stalls. A new stormwater facility, landscaping and asphalt parking areas would be constructed for the proposed project. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics 'Water Light/Glare Plants . Recreation Land/Shoreline Use \. Utilities Animals • Transportation Environmental Health Public Services 'Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation • • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • • • • • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS OYf fr/N c /Z "fr,ATt44t el 4'iv 0 ev 46e-4)//t/v/ M 4" *6415 0t1d eve 64-0.0i-lioAr 4 L hge.golidAerg 4 s' cA te4f AfA-yy at 47f426 f7 wee?'"ia/ t c'd/�6 gtq fide iY ¢I (0444r1'JLV S AM�©geSs`,si%- /I/v 77J /14# I N /$ 7 ` ,� fit,4?-g1t ( s0c) i—s O.113 Pam= cq;'T.. -Tarlc_ S/ • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have,identifed areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature;of Director or Authorized Representative . Date DEVAPP.DOC • Rev.10/93 • i G City of I. 7n Department of Planning/Building/Publi irks ' ' ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: dire eV',,evdtm COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 19, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA96-066,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 5, 1996 APPLICANT: Edi Linardic PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Renton Automotive Center WORK ORDER NO: 78098 LOCATION: 3000 East Valley Highway SITE AREA: 1.77 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 19,430 sf SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval to construct a one-story building totaling 16,430 sf with ai 3,000 sf mezzanine..The building would be used for an automotive center,with an office on the mezzanine level. Proposal would include 88 parking stalls. A new stormwater facility, landscaping and asphalt parking areas would be constructed for the proposed project. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Ught/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistoddCultural Natural Resources Preservation B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS II C CODE-RELATED COMMENTS cilja-r-L) twe4AA-o, 6,64-a T-V1V-e 1916' We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /?6 Signature of Director or Authorize Rep entative Date 9 Rev.ev.10193 ��Y o, CITY OF RENTON c �o A 4 FIRE "PREVENTION BUREAU , ; : 4, MEMORANDUM ; wNTo DATE: ' June 6, 1996' . , TO: Peter Rosen, Planner _ FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review;Inspector SUBJECT: Code-Related Comments for'Renton Automotive Center , , ' - 1 . The preliminary fire flow required is 3,250 gpm. Four fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the, proposed structure,and three fire hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 2: The fire mitigation•fees are applicable at the rate of $0.52 per square foot of building:, 19,430 square feet x $0.52 = $10,103.60. , This fee is payable at the time of building permit-issuance. 3: An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 4. The Fire'Department apparatus access around the building appears adequate. 5. Separate plans and permits are required for spray paint booths. 6..- The applicant shall submit a completed Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement. CTas Rntnauto - - , di City a neon Department of Planning/Bur!Building/Pu Norks ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Po`tce COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 19, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA96-066,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 5, 1996 APPLICANT: Edi Linardic PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Renton Automotive Center WORK ORDER NO: 78098 LOCATION: 3000 East Valley Highway SITE AREA: 1.77 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 19,430 sf SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval to construct a one-story building totaling 16,430 sf with a,3,000 sf mezzanine..The building would be used for an automotive center, with an office on the mezzanine level. Proposal would include 88 parking stalls. A new stormwater facility, landscaping and asphalt parking areas would be constructed for the proposed project. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ • Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation /O. o5 pee odtis es--mate( annuca{lly bawd c) flu Si ci ? Lr(t N- - acnip (K VSfi'( L l pnay Pui I di' (,11)Ir IVO k Seed( Mtn n - In usc, rn orcLW yn in i rn��e our, kWn*l2 y arei van of r 't, - etvComi na Pen(,ficil n ally nottolaba htf-- of Ala Site qtio 16L S) B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS anv its)'-9 s/VWn' q In V ntony )7�- I lx C(lit v lJ bt )(Nun 4L1 d og a I i -bols, ) nfi LL61 . buS1; )d i f se-ff izt, i, Iwo( secoriv Ii ci-t irg io lvis Crof aoulo catt > int ( arto( heavy- 0(wty oLead- Pc!)- locKs 1 kelp °Lam bug/c C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. eiltha Sig ature o Director -r AuthIrized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC � Rev.10/93 City a rton Department of Planning/Building/Pu Vorks ;ENVIRONMENTAL & 'ucVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 41 A to COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 19, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA96-066,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 5, 1996 APPLICANT: Edi Linardic PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Renton Automotive Center WORK ORDER NO: 78098 NORIA It`; FV4,alroirm LOCATION: 3000 East Valley Highway 96L r SITE AREA 1.77 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 19,430 sf SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval to construct a one-story building tega f-1,i .,w° , with a 3,000 sf mezzanine..The building would be used for an automotive center,with an office on the mezzanine Ieee - ' • - IW i include 88 parking stalls. A new stormwater facility, landscaping and asphalt parking areas would be constructed for the proposed project. it ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation B POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS I pplabfiD R5 [JLSW!]Pf �&U IVl r� P 'M� Ib l?S PiRU[5E4) P31 i Ko 50[L6 ,oucil )Eg�. . C.' CODE-RELATED COMMENTS!' FOO l r6 L l° 6/� Y:J I r/Q I)5 {TO �J /L nQB/�t1 ,/1 /t 5 0[C 5 �W Gc[Nf R. P Riot PGA La! 8t)T of/ ag ig t 2, (.40 ll DJLVwl fftt['1(rtle, 5Dt 5 WODL-' coQ 5LA86 Oh hk.ADe, We h-'_ :d this ap is n with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas IA whe = = d i fi is a jetoroperIy assess this proposal. 1 40 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 City o 7ton Department of Planning/Building/Pu „Vorks ; ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: jV e_$ COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 19, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA96-066,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 5, 1996 APPLICANT: Edi Linardic PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Renton Automotive Center WORK ORDER NO: 78098 LOCATION: 3000 East Valley Highway SITE AREA: 1.77 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 19,430 sf SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval to construct a one-story building totaling 16,430 sf with a'3,000 sf mezzanine..The building would be used for an automotive center,with an office on the mezzanine level. Proposal would include 88 parking stalls. A new stormwater facility, landscaping and asphalt parking areas would be constructed for the proposed project. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing c Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS aA )0-Vrtr/tf 6r77-v/ .,ram ..._7C2 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS "A Alb We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those are in which have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whe additional inform-'on is needed to properly assess this proposal. !•:Li. al() /9� Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Dat DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 1. v..{:.::::}.?4}:•}:•iv:{•i:.}::.i:•}•:'i;L.i}:•iiii}:.i::• ii%•:ti.;.;.}:.......... :{:.;{. :• y.h:{{.;};{•{:::{•:Y:4:•i}: •• 4:•}:•}is{4:•}:{4: : r{j;:;:;:::• t�iii.i•�::::,.; .. , ' , :.:f rt<;<:+{:S;r:::}`.S:;;nip}nifi:»::>:::'>:::<::�;:;:{;•::}:;•}}::>}:,::gi• :- {; .::,... <:'.; ':::?:i •:"• , . . .. p.,.E:V;ELOPMENT;SERVLCES.<;DI1lISLON :»:':. • :..::-'..'. ..<'::..::' , {:LIST: �F :SURROUNDINGPROP:ERTY ® � V }{? {S.}.:,}.i.:•::4:•i.stiti4:4i:•i}{•i{.:4i:^ii:ti }::.a :::::•: 4i::?)}.:>:•: iY:.�:;:.}ii':'.:.:..:........ ..... ............ .. • ....„,,,...,.,:„.:,:.,.....:::.,• :::,:„„ • . . { : : : : :: . :: :. :. • : . . . eet..ofahesub,ects1te; :;:: >;'>;::.:; :_><::.;: :::> : . > • f • PROJECT NAME: ate-T-Fitx�-IDe�n- kaovw�NG Cev — APPLICATION NO: `-~-'• , r ^ G '^�-+h• 9C• et y -O(O(O SA ELL ' . j The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The, I)evelopment Services Division will notify these individuals of- the proposed development. . t NAME ADDRESS . ASSES:SOR'S PARCEL . ' . NUMF1111 • . Hawk Family 22435 SE 288th 30230590990,09.80,0910 Kent,Wa 98032 • City of Renton • 200 Mill Ave S. 302305900.3,9004 Renton, Wa 98055 . • .. .. Jeff Schultek 2921 Talbot Rd S . 30230590160. - Renton, .Wa 98055 r• 'Hers,-,•;•: AnmarcoJ 9125 10th Ave So. 30230590940 -.e •�'_ .<.,.. k '. ... . Seattle, WA 98108 � ' °"w, Authur Wahl 2025 1st Ave So.. . ' 12538000100.. , . Seattle, Wa 98121 . « 4,ti; Puget Sound . P.O. Box 90868 . 12538000210: , i . Power and Light Bellevue, Wa 98009 • MWM Land Co ' 3001 E Vallet Hwy 1253.8000200 Renton, Wa"98051 • ' .Ginn Family 7376 SE 71st ST 1253800015.0 " " ' • , • , Partnership Mercer Is., Wa 98040 , , . . Win"-'•,, o • ' • _ ,,I - • cIT(oF . (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) , .. . .... ,...y.• -• . .,. - 1 • ., - •••• l• '. „• . . . . . i[I (Continued) NAME • ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL .,.• .. .• i 1," 1 I NUMBER. . ' • • 1 1 11 ' . . • . i I . I 1, . ., I [ • . 1 ' 1 1 , • Applicant Certification '1 • ' I, - / -hi-)Afl-it)/eI , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property 1 1 • (Print Name) -. owners and their addresses were obtained from: , . • • E3 City of Renton Technical Seryices.flecords .• 1, 1:1- Title Company Records ., . . d • . It1. King County Assessors Records !I , • Signed -__ _iZ--- Date . I I • ' • " ' I . , . ..4,k‘•vo.iil 1 (Applicant) . • I • '. I. #4‘54M•ftesal,01 le I • I — • NOTARY ' I• 9 .. ....• , ,. [ Adf 1:141iettyt.tubscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington,• • 0 b Fin al 5 on the .2-1 ,clay of 04.0 /•).-..7e•,, • , 19 74 . ° ' ' k% i'4/0.7 • . . . . .1 ' kl). 'c -1:AP 10 t. '.'• ' - (1 . :1 . Vi,h4;tl'i'II%%%VW." da' (Notary Publi 'III f 't%**""S". - ----••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••,;:x•m•:,,,,;•,,,;••••:,44.*• ,...•For., ..,.....City.:„..0f, ...Ft.6iii..6.6*.u .6 ,..,1,.„...:....,.,....::„......... ,,... . ., , .......,.......,„.„..„.„.„:.,„„,„. . ,. .... .. .. „.....:„.,..,„:„:„:„.........:,....„, .. „ ..........,./......... .t.z:.:.:....:,.•.:.:::,......::::::.:......................i.....,...........:i.i,:, ,...:*,::::.:..,:::..i..:*i...........:-.............,. . .. , .,......................„......„::„......, tiTJflQATJPNPfi::::IY). .j.iltil ...:giioi::....:.:i:::.w..:......-...........i...,...,.:.....-...... i ..........:.,...., ...„....:...,.:„....,..,.. .:„. r::::::::i:....:?..ii:::::.....ii ' • ''‘':i''''..'''''':"*. "'::""' ''::::••.'":"••••••'•••••••:"*••••••"'• •-••%.-:::-.--..:iii..fiati....notices.'bfAh.e.i proposed iia p p I 1 c a t 1 o r.1,.-.we(e mailed. ...:: P.:::::: ::::::.:*i:i*i !P:i::'.: ' ::.....:.•.•.-•::::::.:;•::::::::::.'..•......s.I..................... P..P..qi....f.Y.:::•;:.:•.::::::::,.'::::::::.:••••••:,...',..••••••;.:::.....:.:•:...::::.:.....?....:.:.......:.:...:.:...:::::.:::::::.:::...:......::-:•.....,.-... .....„.....,:.::.....-.:•:•,...:.........::.:i::.::;i:::.,::;:.,.:.:;,,......::::::::.,,,E,,,:::.: ••••••.........................„.............. CIAY;::.•rt)P 9Y.P...•::i:i:i:giiiiii:iiiig.:iiiiiiiiiiiiii:iiii§::• i:::ii6 i:i...,;•,:::.0:.::i.gg:i.i.d.::::iiili.M.Mii.:•:::..yiiiiini.iiiimsini:iii::TI•Nrii..........!........;:••... ..:......::..:.:;,......:....:..:.;.; :...::.i:;................„:„...i.......,.......„...:.iii...:....,,iii. each 'isted property owner on '../31.1:: :::::i*:.::.:t.*i..i:i:i:::::::i.::::i:i.:: :::::::;;;.:;::ii::::.:iri*:.*:*:••i*i:ii*K:::::::...:::i:::::::::::::::::::.:i:::i$i:if::::ili:i:::•:*::::::::::•:::•:,.*:*::;:;*i*:;;:i*:::..;::i::::*i.;:;::: :;::::iii::::;....i:is•gi:i:i..i:x:mi:i*K*:::;::;;!..::::•.*:...,..... . .....;. .0,01, ..!1/ 1606al3:::;q.' 1i2E : f $.i.i..n:i,:;,....,,:,:::i.::i::•.:..;..*,.M:.::,;:......:::.'*,.::,.:..:..,i,:,',:,.:::.:::::::,:D',,......'..:.':,atet:4 ff0:::•:::!:S,...........:,4*.„,..A. C ,I %•' .s-'. ..Nn. ,'-.,.......: ,.,,.....,....:.......:.....,,....;..:.., ;‘.:.*e...,4.:&.,en'1:4:!.:.5:!...**:s.X:::::::::::::::::.:,,,,,,,,,,,V.,*:::::::::::::::::::•:•:•:,:•:4•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•::::::::::::::::::::.::;,....:...:.:.:,,,,,::.,.:.;..,....„,;:!:::::::.::::::::,,,:,,,:,:,:,..,,,,...,:,,.....:,.....,:,...,....,......,,,,....,.....,.,.....,::..:.............. , t, , , 4ta ..../....:::,,,.. ....,.„:::. .:';'::g.';'.:..,:$:,i:ai":11.i::.P:i':,.:::0::!::e.2::giNI::: :::::1::Mg:ii:::i:MiiilggliiiiMi:::::,ili:a.::a.,;::::,::,R,;ii:O.::...iN:,iiiii::...ii:d* iiiiiii!;0!idii::',:iii!iii:iii:iiiii;:•i:.,ia.,':,.." .:.,...,.......,_,....-:,..p,•,,,.,,..,, ,.,..,..,,......,.i....:....:.:.,..,,..„,..........:..........,;...„,,,,. N OTARYM::::::r:iiiii.:iiiii::.ir.iii:.:::.i.ii::::A::::.ir.:::m.::: :..,:....-:-,.'...3:,.:,:,,: ‘,.....4\.?„9:-..??..: ,...„::::•:::::::::;.:•,.;...::;:::... ..0.i:: ::4,-.5„*::;::*i:li:,:.:.:i:]ii*Mi:::i:::i::::.*i::::.:i:::::i:i*:.*::::::i:,!::.*:::.:::*.::K:i:i*:.:i*:*i::.:,:::.:iiiii:::§:iiiiiiii:,iiiiiii:,:.im:::i::::.•,:.:.,::::„,:::„,:„..::,:::,::„:,.;::::::.,....,,...,,.:.::;:............:.......:„...,:::::::......„...........,.:.:::::::,::...:::.....„.„.„..,..,„ ..:„ 7......,, .-...,.,,,„,... ,._, ...., ...i:,:::;,,,,,:,•:,.....,,,..,,....,........,:,.. :,,,,,.,,s:s.:',::,,,,,S,,,I.,1:',::,,,,,,,,,:',::::,::::::::',::::::::::::::::::.:•:::::,:::::::,:::::::,:::::::::::,::::::::::•::::::::::::::•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•NI.:,:ti?:•:•.•:.f:-...:•:•:....:ff::•,...-:.:•:•:....,,•:::::::.....:.,.......:..„..,.,,...t...............,..:,:::::,,,::.:.v.:•:........:•;:•,•:•:„,,...... . ,. . ,,...,., 4 • .,...,,.,,,,...t..,,,,..,„.,.. „vo,i ..,,,,...........,........,,.....f.:: .. ' ../*'.-..*:''':;::::.':::::**:::::::::::::.....:*1: 13:f*:::":"•' Er:::::::::::::•-•:'•:*::::rf ,'-'-,:::::-.%:::Ns-t-FPUblidmi-ftiiti.:Ior:ihe'7,ata-e:::01:.. .ath4pxon::,:•::::::•,..::•.::::t$OTESP:•::i.Sti :$cn...:ed:::a.a. ::::AW:91:41•:':i.:...P,Pr• :::M9i.:&.,.:R...9ia. ...•,..:,.......i..i:::::: ....:......:i1:.,,..:.... :.::. .. ...,......., ..i,....:::::iiv..,:.::::...:....A::::i::::. iaiig.:.:?:' ,..::::.::::..•, ...*.r.. i::.*:*sx:i::::::!:::-:..i:r.::.*:.:i.ofifth6::::::::*,*::::*?..47:::.*::::::ifi...ddyisof.i**,:i, ....:...:....................,...„.....: .-.....,::...................:.::::.. ..,....„............., .,:,:.:.i....,.::.....:..:::.:.i:i.i..:„.., -- ::::::':*imxiiiiii'•:iiir.:ii:i'Maiigii':!:iii:i:iiiN:i.:i.;:::::.:Mi',..::ii.::::P.:::i:..i"iiii;Iiili'..i•iii::::ii•iirg.:E?::::::::.]::::i':ii...:::46::::::i:...:,::::i:::::•:.:..i.::::.:.;....:•.464:::r1WK'5i':.:°';'::.:::......'.f::i • ),, .10-.":1Ctigl:'..::••:,iii?.-•::•••:'??.?...iii.f:•::?:::•••:::.•iiiiii•:::':**:::::::•:::.i.•••:iiin:'.'•?..:•:.::.::.:-:iiiiiiiiii::i:i:i:i•i'••::•iiiiiiiii::.:.•::•;iliiiii:.ii:.•;•:::i::::;••••,..•••••••••••:::::,',...:.•1::::..... ,•.::':::.:•••:::,.:•:::":- ''..'•::::'::::::•;:•:ii:ii:.i:s......•;,.iii•:iiiiii:?•::::i .••:.1::: ' titifittri'3'.0.•.e.•:.:.;.{...:.:...:::;:....;.ifai4Wii,ragiNVi:"•••:•:•:f:::•:•••••.'•'''.••••••:•:::•::*::::::::::,:•;:::::.:••.:!:•,::::::.f;.•:::.i.,iii:ig::.:: :::*.::;*.:::•.;;;;?if,:i:ii:*:.*i:::iom•.„,..:.....,.......,.„,f.,...,,„...,.....,...,:..,...............,...........„.„.......................,..,... ,. , 1 . .... listprop.doc . el4/91fit W1/4P- . . , • REV 07/95 .. . . . . ' • , I . . . NOTICE OF PRUFOSED SITE PLAN APPROVAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Approval Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Renton Automotive Center LUA96-066,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: Proposal to construct a one-story building totaling 16,430 SF with a 3,000 SF mezzanine. The building would be used for an automotive center,with an office on the mezzanine level. Proposal would include 88 parking stalls. A new stormwater facility, landscaping and asphalt parking areas would be constructed for the proposed project. GENERAL LOCATION: 3000 East Valley Highway PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. BOOWw'nao-v-a RENTON^-1,l,— '` _ - .rt't_4 _- _'�__ __ P'r"] V, �N y,4t 1 . a-- I e,r� Talbot IINI P.n I. d\ O°.ae w. ,,Yr C.OM N'£ACE,.PAAM •C 9t-I -- ----i�1pm�(D•'•t• - -----_-- - —: 1 _..,.- . ‘t.1d \ -- . '1'•" flNmry 4 , • `�--- - ®` ,,,,k .CA. ''jAt1 a'i:.'_ •\� t50-.,�o,-aa�f'r ` „ T . ; ,, . " 'a4; , i.71::;-'-— i Of""16, ':-S\tre-, ''. I :' . a o {°p a goo , ,;.. . d - , r . a 9 , . 5ru mom- 0' i ' 'II' Iif' CA ---) � -a- -_I 1 _-.J, 1 fi, 1 'z. .. IIl jB "_C '"'•°tA.' 1 r ~ 1I lil I ,... (f�F --fig :a. ,. -�';,, rc• I ; "N' :ORNOOD'AAP,/0-I=° y '�i E7 ,,�.; I<; ;' _R-s .;--11 og �' a?a=<.m is ,, 1 i7` #;s`,4� :A 5 Z JJJ1 N` .1 ! `•'B'�,^ 'T^ r j Ii '2: , l N O R T N E A N 1 � ...., XR ..n J. • ,1 I I CA, i 14t•!. _ix ' ,Ir j.j µ -"ems ^ , 2-:.p '.I _ .—;IL=:_• 7"- I `'- :_.t.- ----- _f; r-1. . G,ENMALOT.DOC ,.-._,~.r..,. I , . , , ... , ; . . NoncE. PENDING APPLICATION. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Renton Automotive Center/LUA99-068,SA,ECF ' • DESCRIPTION: • Proposal to construct a one-story building totaling 16,430 SF with a 3,000 SF mezzanine.The building would be used for an automotive center,with an office on the mezzanine level.Proposal would Include 88 parking stalls.A new slormwater facility,landscaping and asphalt parking areas would be constructed for the proposed project. • ' GENERAL LOCATION: 3000 East Valley Highway PUBLIC APPROVALS: _Building Permit _Preliminary Plat _Short Plat Conditional Use Permit _Rezone XXX_Site Plan Approval XXX Environmental Review _Shoreline Conditional Use _Other Permit _Fill&Grade Permit _Shoreline Substantial _Other Development Permit . li The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any lime prior to Public Hearings,during Public Hearings,or pprior to an administraMe silo plan approval.Comments forion"publication ial Shoreline Permits must be received within thity(30)days from the last date of applicant's Wntlm or Application"pub in the Valley Daily News. For further Information en the application,or If you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental determinations,appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s)for this project,please contact the Development ' Services Division at 235-2550.4 —r .7."7tI _ .. . 11I l' -Jt=�-:fir''' ----`—1'- a • IR II"„ I. 'p p ''',D' .fir I! 'a 'IL r 1 . :,�I . . , .1 -anrs--t pr�oa .-- ... III..' Jj C.. y R-I+ ,v/;11:?1G,"RY\�.. .._,.. 1 S a �V�RRk). YYYYYY • II RLl1 I• t :,;._ ,'X•F.,u 3}}``'' . _ .lu. I' 7.i..1' _ ''. LJ ere _ • ,� IL. .I :VI— i' .1. ' . :. • I • :TA.: ill •"rL I(IR j -g PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION.''t->, ' CERTIFICATION • I, Stuic./4 ,JICA S61 , hereby certify that 5 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on Signed: g lirYAA1-, Oike 2: UY1 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) , • ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) • • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that a9-r‘ -r c_(c S B-.". . signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free an voluntary act for the uses ' and purposes mentioned in the instrument. 4, I; r=�' . . No ary ublic and or the State o hin ton �; #,��n ``" 1 ►e y 1 - /y/,oat CZv S c - _. . Notary (Print) �,y n; ! A.) m- nn e 1.e -C ' A L Qg My appointment expires & - X 9-- 9 e, n, 1 • NOTARY.00C II, '. . . PENDING APPLICATION PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Renton Automotive Center/LUA96-066,SA,ECF - DESCRIPTION: Proposal to construct a one-story building totaling 16,430 SF with a 3,000 SF mezzanine. The building would be used for an automotive center,with an office on the mezzanine level. Proposal would include 88 parking stalls. A new stormwater facility, landscaping and asphalt parking areas would be constructed for the proposed project. GENERAL LOCATION: 3000 East Valley Highway PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit Preliminary Plat Short Plat Conditional Use Permit Rezone XXX_Site Plan Approval XXX Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Use Other Permit Fill&Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial Other Development Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any time prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last date of applicant's"Notice of Application" publication in the Valley Daily News. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. I 600W 7..f.?vo...I{.,..:. '__.._ __ ," .,_..,—:, 's✓ -__r�_.:_.,4,,r FJ t .. ° o .IL' y;: ; '\\ 'w-¢it - ; ',. v 1 Jt .1 * ' •'•-''• •• '•••'‘•• 1 \ : '''It te'il'U'' '''\ ' l. RC i - S ... . '''.; f,' _.Uis `y '.d ;ii 3e z .r<•,' - ... ; R 8 .alp — - -• I[r=• !I__ .'i_ • i ©CAa I'll _ ___ -",0-i,,,1 ,,r4o,,onii,At0. i 1 i i in: i ..� ill; ---- I 41-til-•'O•.--'MAI,•'•. .L-q_ i F—e • .., a _ —._.J l_ �_J °'`.; III! _.• 11 ..' •1 f _ � � _•'_---� Te•_s .ill -,I, tl. ___a..-Y�_..-i -p(u"°°"000 Wp to`C---- ICY of /)- �' IL `u toy Q1 __.___ _—_" ::( ,�„4"�:tY_1...Mum�,.r.'j ' 1. R-8 °-^. I ' .i i; - — 11' coy...c 4',.I -)I TM 1 -5A- { - ,a-'-I'RrEr• 5 i I PLEA5EINCLUD0'.HE:;PROJECT;:NUMBER'WHEN°CALLING:'FOR:PROPERflLE:IDENIIFICATI N >'...;:: 1 •,14Ip*yffy' f(yJ CIT'S )F RENTON II�.'n-A# .. _ Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 5, 1996 Edi Linardic 1319 Dexter Avenue North#260 Seattle, WA 98109 SUBJECT: Renton Automotive Center • LUA96-066,SA,ECF - Dear Mr. Linardic: • • The Development Planning.Section of. the City of Renton has determined that the ' subject application is complete according to submittal.requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on. - July 2, 1996.: Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information' is . required to continue processing your application for environmental review.. - . Please contact me, at 235-2719, if you have any questions. Sincerely, • • • Peter Rosen . _ _ • Project Manager cc: Rhonda Younker • ACCPTLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 This paper contains 50%recycled material,25%post consumer J•r.//.rfrv:•Y:r •„si / !f :r: Jf ::.:•ii:?•:.'•;;.::.�.:�:::::::•i:•:•Y:•Y:•:;•:•::•Y::•ii:•i:•i:•i:•><??•i:•;:;, •: ::::::::•.:: . . Y.,., ;.;•.:. .. ....................... ............. ... .................... Q .................................... ....... •i:•>:•i>:•Y:•Y:•::•i:•Y::.:•.�:•>:•i:•::•�:•::�;:�:::o:::::'�:��>:;:�:!::::i::�:2::�:�::is�>:i::::Y:�>::::•Y:�:::•>:;;?•>:•Yi:•iY:::::5::;:•i:•Y:•:+:i:£: :frrfr„ .. r<:.�.::.:.::::::::::::::::::::::.............................:..:. .::::::::: ::::::.�:.:�:::CI..T,Y.;.OF:.RENT :ON................. .............................. .... ........:.....:..::.:. .:..:::: ::::::::::........ r .. ....... ............ : . ... . . T S RVI ES:::DI'.: 0 ::<:::Y::::<:::;::i::;;;::.>;;>;>:::<:>:::.>::.:-::;::>: :>::;:«:<>::»>::>:::>:::::iY:.:.:>'iY>::.ii.:.:;.Y;:.:::;;: J: ..r.rr .�.,. r<•Y;.•.�:•:.�:::.J:::;..>:•ixiii::•i:•Y>:>:.>Y>:.::is�:<•Y:•:YY:;•Y:•>:;•;ii:.:•::>: AST,'.:; :��':: ..�.:: :. ,::.".��� ��". �::::: ?.:.: :»:r:::.::::::::::::::: .�:�:�.:::.::::: ::::::::�VM.,A::ST.ER APPLI�,;A•TI:OIV :: ....::::::::::;:::;:::::::: } i::.i,:.YY:?.: :.iiii:.:.i:.i:.YY:.is. :.:; ; .i ::.:YY:. : ?.Y:?ii:Y:i:.::•i:..:.Y.Y:i ?;;::::;. : : : ..... ........ . iiii . ,:::.:.::•:::::::.�. ::: J::;YYYi:::.:iY:.:iY.:.:?.Y:.iY::Y:•Y:iY:.:.:�::::::.::::::::::::. ::::::::::::•�::::: : .. . : :. ; .0•1 ER �S� Y : :: ': :: ': ::: ECf>INFORMATlON::�con t .ii.::.Yii;.Y?;;.:.:t . ...•.Y.i:x.:.,: •i.•i..x.?:•.:?•i,.;:.:.:.*..;:;:.:..:i•.::•i:i.::•i•:..Y•.i:.•::•.:::....,.:...:.,.::.::.....:.....: i ; :..;�;>Y.:::;::;::?:..:.::;.::..::.:.:::..:::.:::>:::.:::. •:::.......,....:.:::::.:....:::::.::::;::::::::.....:.„,....,„ :. ...:. . :. . . : . .:::.�:::::;:::.�:::::::.,,. N.0:.O:,r f There s r'mote:;than;one:le0al..g#P.Oj' rease>attach an::additional' 17,...?f>ctaritedMaster.•Application,foreach cwnar.,.....,:::;::i: ::';•:" '• "`'.":;'' EXISTING LAND USE.(S): VACANT • NAME: RHONDA YOUNKER • • ADDRESS: 1 rp 1 87 ' J . ')zp LI R-LL PROPOSED LAND USES: I 1 16,430 SF AUTOMOTIVE CENTER . . . .. CITY:, gGL-L.FVLah ZIP: 1aty0S ' . EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: • • COMMERCIAL i TELEPHONE NUMBER: (20(0) (pc-( I S52-S I ' • PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:•• • • ' • »<r<::.:....:::.:::::C,ON.TA..C:T::::P.ERS;ONIAPP.LC�ANT: . ` '�.: '::.: SAME NAME: • EDI LINARDIC/. LDG ARCHITECTS ' EXISTING.ZONING: CA ADDRESS: 1319 DEXTER AVE. N. #260 PROPOSED ZONING: CITY: SEATTLE ZIP: WA /; g10ci '- SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): , TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206)283-4764 1.77 ACRES PROJECT VALUE: >` ``«> <'> `><>P:R:O.J.E.CTI.NF.OR......A71ON............................ • PROJECT Oft•DEVELOPMENT NAME: $680,000 �10,% e ,N,,,AUTTMOTIVE CENTER IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? e • �et €t YJ �JpcT ADD'RESS(S)/LOCATION: NO 30 .,.,•.FT VALLEY HWY • � gAST .VALLEY HWY & SR 167 d� !'aB IS THE SITE LOCATED IN AN.Y't.TJ :Y'PE OFf1I ENVIRONMENTALLY Y,••- .• x OF-SW 29TH STWEEN • SENSITIVE AREA? Mr KING C„O MTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): NO F%i?'� r pro lC,,' • • • 1 302305-9085-01 cevs op aF vet,‘. , ::::..LEG' >DE ecessa?AL S. RIF' �•> ,RO TY: :<sheet if n C 11i��>� P F'ER Attach>a�' " • • 302305 85 POR N 1/2 OF N 1/2 OF N 1/2 OF '• S 1/2 OF SW 1/4 OF 'NE 1/4 OF PSH #5 AS PER AUD #5349889 & E OF 92ND AVE' S i. . ::>:>:::::St:'•.;;.:.•:5ai::5::5SSS:5:::<';::^2;:SiS::x:>:<::.e..!;i ?:>:ii:•;::`ri:,.V:Sri:• ...... ... . T:Y ..E;:OF:'APPLICATION:> :;: .• :;::;.;;:;: ..:• '::::;':,:::;:;; : , ::::;�;<:>:«!:: :>; ::>:<::<:»::>:<:>::;::<::;:<;>:: C.:.eck:.a I.a .).c.at o. 4 .es t at.a .I .C t ..staftw I..determine ees.. . ,:...::.:::..::. ' ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: ' _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ _ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ 1 . ' _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ __ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _ TENTATIVE PLAT $ • • • • • : CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT ' $ . K SITE PLAN APPROVAL $/o.DID --- _ FINAL PLAT ' $ • • . ', _ GRADE& FILL PERMIT $ ' _ VARIANCE. $ (FROM SECTION: ) • PRELIMINARY —WAIVER $ _ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ . . • ROUTINE VEGETATION • MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ ' MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ BINDING SITE PLAN' $ I SHORELINE REVIEWS: 1 _ SUBSTANTIALjDEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE • .$ • • _VARIANCE ' • $ _ EXEMPTION ' $No Charge , K ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ .`-to - . . REVISION $ I. • ' • - II. • ' :::Y.%ti!{ti!': ::i?:•?ii sr,$ }::$i:: i }:iiii:::ii :v:•:;.;{•: ::tiii::::: `:: :: ::..;.:i .�:: ;:.. . .;:.i.; ;: isi•i:: :+:v::;::;::'t:i::::'::::::::::.::'ip::i ::::i:::.:::i:(iv::::s•: }:::::::::•i::ii:i:;: :. :::::?•:iT'v:::::':•):� •:'i4::i::•::'•:3::'•i;:v:i$:i':4;:'v": '':•{:::�{':.;::>.i::::i::•'0: � •..L :.: •::isii'':::v.....: .:..: .':•.':'�.:•:i:•'•:;.•v' :^::;i :?i4:i:4:is}i:::i}::i::•:Si;i�i: L }/n..i.iS:i:5•:11;: i•:i}:�:•i;ii iiii::•i:4iiii:i::'•:::i:.:•.:..:::..:::ris::•.+.;::+;:•:•y::•: o :: ..: :::.'::. :..:'.. ::.:::.::.:'.:::....:..'�::i:.:: IiIii•iIIi;::•sL.:<.ii;4iii;.;:..i:•:•:ig iii . ..:..:............,..,..::.:..:•::::.:. ::::::::::.:.:..:.:...:.:::::. . :.::.::.:.... .: . DAVIT::.OF:'OWNERS.HIP.••.....:..............:.... ... ....................:.....::... ....:.:..,•:.:::..::: ::: } . II,(Print Name) 2/ 4 ilVAOOIL , declare that I am (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application, the ' . authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof.of authorization); and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. �^ ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me.ems eta P`u1Ii�A in and f A/.0A.A.Q/ G- for the State of Gil.& residing at ' • y (Name of w,er/Representative) . m` � ,91 _, on the 0% _,,trim y� � � on,�J NOTARY ro (Signs u e of Owner' epresentative) , / C „�_ _ 9 A(1BL1Ci • (Signature of Notary P ee 17), ��.%leo� ?' ....::.::::.::..:::......:......:................ . i:ff: ': i•> :.fa e >S-, om let d>b�•�:<s>C..t•:... . ,):g><<<stoi>:> :< <gn;<; ? m><>en><<<< s ®.i'.::: ®»>:::; .::•:CPA<>:::::: �:::::»:::;:;;::.. >::; :::;::>;:>;;::n:::gni:::>::::>::>::::>:> :»>::>> • .:F.<:::<:>::::>>•:>:as>:>::::>::::>.>.iM':T. >;: :;/ I D D::' $ :::... :'>;::>: : ' ::;>:rc :< : ??»::?:>:`::<::><s:. { `.;: >:<:>:::<:::::>:>:><:<<:::::<:: TOTAL"P:.OSTAGE:°�?fO.V. E :.::.::..:.:. :...:.::.. REVISED 2/95 :::>::::::::>:::<::<:>:::::::>::::<::>::>::>:<:>::;:::::>::>»::::<:>::::::»::>:::»;>:>:<::>;: P.MENT:SERS/ICES:DIU15(:Q�•":'<`<»>»>:»>>< : >�»;<;> ' �:'< >>��>> IIIIII,Is•IPENM.I.R.O.NMENTALICHECKLJSTINIIIIII.L.: : .• .• .• • • • PURPOSE O.F CHECKLIST: The State Environmental.Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this.checklist is to.provide'information to help you and the . 'agency identify.impacts from'your proposal (and to reduce.or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required., • . INSTRUCTIONS.FO.R.APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. ' Governmental .agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with. the most precise information known; or.give the best description,you can. • • You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, • you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans.without the.need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know"or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. .. • • Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, ,shoreline, and landmark designations: Answer these questions if you.can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can • • assist you. The checklist,q.uestions apply to all,parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them-over period.of • time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional. information, that will, help- describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you r submit this checklist may ask you to explain'your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant,adverse impact. . USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even .though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT.ACTIONS (part D):. For nonproject actions (actions:involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), •the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic,area," respectively. . ti 04:--11t,01OR . Oe�G1OTE of A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Renton Automotive Center 2. Name of applicant: LDG/Architects 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 1319 Dexter Ave. N., Suite 260 Seattle, WA 98109 Contact Person: Edi Linardic 4. Date checklist prepared: 5-28-96 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable): Start preload of the site on August 1, 1996, with construction commencing on October 1, 1996. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions,expansion,of further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes,explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared,or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Soils reports, wetland study and phase one study(see attached). 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,explain. No. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Site plan approval, fill and grading permit and building permit. 11. Give brief,complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. This project will involve 1.77 acres. Currently, the site has is undeveloped, we intend to construct an automotive center totaling 16,430 s.f and 3,000 s.f. of mezzanine. The buildings will be constructed with the concrete tilt-up walls and wood roof. The balance of the site will be landscaping, required storm water retention and parking lot. 1 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section,township, and range if know. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,site plan,vicinity map,and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Located along East Valley Road near S.W. 29th Street. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site(circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope?) Less than 1%, except at the ditch where slopes are 20%. c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example,clay,sand,gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify them and note any prime farmland. Brown, silty sand with gravel of up to nine feet on top of peat. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There are no surface indications of any unstable soils. e. Describe the purpose,type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The site is flat. The fill would be used for the preloading. Once the building pad has settled, any remaining fill would be spread across the site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so,generally describe. No. During construction of the undeveloped portion of the site, the accepted erosion control methods will be in utilized (see attached TESC plan). S. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example, asphalt or buildings)? 72% 2 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth, if any: There will be an erosion control plan submitted as part of our building permit set(see attached TESC plan). 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.,dust,automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. There will be some dust while the preload is unloaded and during construction. The type of emissions that could be emitted would be from automobile/trucks both during and after construction. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: There are no measures proposed at this time to mitigate automobile emissions, due to the minimal emission. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year- round and seasonal streams,saltwater, lakes, ponds,wetlands)? If yes,describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. A drainage ditch along the north and east property line. 2) Will the project require any work over, in,or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes, building and parking. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 3 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. None. We do not expect any waste material to be discharged to surface water. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any(for example: Domestic sewage; industrial,containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served (if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. None c) Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal, if any(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, if so,describe. All storm water runoff from this site will flow through a series of water quality swales and ponds prior to releasing into the cities system. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe. No. d) Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff water impacts, if any: None. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain X wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage(see attached wetland report) X water plants:water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other(see attached wetland report) other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Landscaping will be provided according to the zoning requirements.(see attached landscape plan) 4 c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Landscaping will be provided according to the zoning requirements. A landscape plan has been submitted as part of this package. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other none Fish: bass, salmon,trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None' c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,etc. Depending on the tenant there could be natural gas heating systems installed with electric powered lighting and cooling units. b., Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energy efficient lighting would be installed as well as energy efficient heating systems per Washington Energy Code. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 5 a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion,spill,or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Police, fire dept. in case of emergency. Type of emergency will vary with the potential user of this site. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Future tenant will have to adhere to all required codes to minimize any environmental health hazard and provide a plan to control such event. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example:traffic, equipment,operation,other)? General traffic noise generated by cars and trucks along adjacent streets and SR-167. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis(for example:traffic,construction,operation,other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short time noise would be construction related, expected hours of operation would be 7:00 a.m.- 5:00 p.m. ST. Long term noise would be general car and truck traffic noise during business hours. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The noise impacts generated by this project are not unlike other uses in this area. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is undeveloped, sites to the north houses commercial activity,to the south is a trailer storage yard , west is East Valley Highway and to the east is S.R. !67. b Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. No c Describe any structures on the site. Presently, there are no structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? C.A. (Commercial Arterial) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial 6 g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? None h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 15-40 people will work once the project is complete. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The architecture will be compatible with the surrounding uses. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle,or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. The building height is 25 ft. The building will be concrete tilt-up with storefront glass. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Use of landscaping around the building, use horizontal lines to break up the height, setting building away from the property lines to minimize its impact from the street. • i 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Lighting in the parking lot area during evening hours. Shielded lights will be proposed to minimize spill over to the adjacent properties. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Provide shielded lights so there will be no spill over to adjacent properties. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on,or proposed for, national state,or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological,scientific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The proposed site is served by East Valley Highway. 8 b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes c. How may parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 88 parking stalls will be provided. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private)? No. e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail,or air transportation? If so,generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 40 P.M. peak hour trips. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example: fire protection, police protection, health care,schools,other)? If so,generally describe. Yes, but no more than comparably sized developments. No additional fire service would be required except in case of emergency. There should not be any additional requirements for police or health care. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Provide monitored security, smoke and fire detection,well lit pathways and building entrances. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site. electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. 9 b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. All of the above circled utilities will be utilized by the new facility for the same reasons the existing facility used them. Electricity for HVAC and lighting natural gas for HVAC,water for fire protection, domestic service, garbage, telephone and sanitary sewers will be used. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: 02/ ( /.14/>/G Name Printed: Pl L/ °/ C-- Date: 5' • 21 • `t'c• 10 PROJECT NARRATIVE, FOR THE PROPOSED . RENTON AUTOMOTIVE CENTER This proposed project is located between East Valley Highway and SR 167 in Renton directly east of SW 29th St. The site is vacant and flat. The project involves the construction of a new one-story building totaling 16,430 sq. ft. with a mezzanine of 3,000 sf. ft.with 88 parking stalls. The building will be used for an automotive center with an office on the mezzanine level.. New storm water system, landscaping and asphalt parking areas will be constructed for the proposed project. The buildings will be constructed with concrete tilt-up walls, wood roofing, and insulated glass. q approvalspermitsproject plan/SEPAapproval,The required and for this ro'ect include site. review a royal, and building permit. There is a drainage ditch along the north and east property lines. The banks of the drainage ditch are vegetated and have slopes of approximately 2 to 1. No work is anticipated within the drainage ditch areas. i RECIENE* DE`dELOF VI N r PLANNING CITY OF RENTON CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION PLAN. FOR THE PROPOSED REN.TON AUTOMOTIVE CENTER The proposed construction.would start immediately after acquiring the structural fill and grade permit. Anticipated start date would be August 1, 1996. The fill settlement should take approximately two months to place, baring any unforeseen.settlement problems. The construction of the'buildingwill follow the fill and the anticipated start date would be October 1, 1996. The project should take approximately six months to construct, baring any.unforeseen weather problems. The construction hours will be between 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. with weekend work as required to finish the project. The entire site is undeveloped. The northerly and easterly portion of the site is covered with shrubs. Approximately 2500 cubic yards of import will be delivered to this site for structural fill and sub base for parking. The haul route has not yet been selected, but will be:provided for your approval prior to construction. Measures to minimize dust and mud are shown on the TESC drawings. As a whole, the project will not create any additional impact to the surrounding environment. RECEIVED , . .. ry, 2,' 9 1996 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY of RENTON &A.SSOCIATES • RoC�ald NowickiRobert Simons =__.. Wetter Pick ENERGY & ENviRox;tEti i•��,�,�a � Arlene Van De Wege Elizabeth Davis 79915 Michael Lam �G,, Mark Williams ,V,�r,ir.. ®®p� ()I rY.OF R, y tr.(11 2 '�9 E� 6 Paigeratzer. FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL MAY 2 9 1996 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Dat(.' ` - 6. .;'GCITY OF RENTON S From ,,- /-e,,..,,, Total Pages (including cover) / / . Reply Yes Reply No_ Urgent_____ . Subject �;� _ / „c: - /------c,,,J- ,i, /4—, , e)t- ,-, -1 1 . . . . If you do not receive all pages, please contact us as soon as possible. . . Phone (206) 927-5233 FAX (206).924 0323 . Message / �r(;�: lc 1 •�`'X , . . c‘1_c rt'c 'fro es L 7' ' r fi.k , y: /.ltr"i f e• . CI . Ale'/ ex Ct f/Q 7:-:wl AP f c -1nv t+t• V'I" , I 1?"-kel- /-0 ktel,./ 5,, d, c-3, '!,<0 , le,4 ,../ a#:,3 jZzi_____, . . . • . _ r / l/7 i 'S S' (f tp • �/ ^ -- ` •-1 i tea 33516 9th Avenue Sc,urh Building #6 Federal Way, Washington 98003 Phone: (206) 927.5233 EENCH.MARR DEVELOPMENT - EAST VALLEY PROJECT SITE ASSESSMENT 3000 East Valley Road, Renton, Washington Client: Consultant: Benchmark Development,Company Nowicid & Associates, Inc. . .. . 5020 141st Avenue SE 33516 9th Avenue S., Bldg. #6 Bellevue, WA 98006 Federal Way, WA 98003 Contact: Mark Sandier Contact: Arlene Van De Wege (206) 747-8055 (206) 927-5233 • The purpose of this report is to document the site investigation at 3000 East Valley Road in Renton. This report is written in compliance with WAC 173-340, Model • Toxics Control Act independent cleanup actions. This report conforms to the scope of work detailed in the March 29, 1996 letter and , is for the sole use of Benchmark Development Company and the property owner. No additional distribution of this report is authorized without the express written consent of Nowicki & Associates, Inc.. It should also be noted that this report is not a definitive guarantee that no . " unidentified pollutants currently exist on the property nor that an unspecified imminent contamination potential does not exist. However, based upon the data • analyzed, the:likelihood of unforeseen contamination or the potential for major future contamination from unidentified sources appears remote. Conclusions and recommendations prescribed by this analysis are predicated upon visual inspection, Thin Layer Chromatography field screening, laboratory analysis, the prior analyses of others, and the interview, responses from involved parties. • Interpretation of these elements has been performed within the generally accepted scope of a hazardous material investigation and the specified scope of work. ' Attached are: Sketches - Site Location Soil Boring and Monitoring Well Locations Tables - Table 1: Soil Sample Laboratory Analysis • Table 2: Groundwater Sample Laboratory Analysis Table 3: Water-Level Data Table 4: Groundwater Field Parameters Groundwater Flow Direction and Gradient Calculations: 4-16-96 & 4-29-96 Monitoring Well Construction Logs Soil Boring Logs Laboratory Analysis with chain of custody - Soil Samples Groundwater Samples Thin Layer Chromatography Field Screening Results Benchmark Development Company - • East Valley,Project- Site Assessment NowicRi &Associates,;Inc, April, 1996 CUTIV1 SINMARY On April 11, 1996, nine soil borings were placed on the vacant lot.at 3000 East Valley Road; three borings were converted to monitoring wells., Forty-five soil samples*ere field-analyzed using Thin Layer Chromatography: Semi-volatile hydrocarbons were. detected in soil borings SB1 and SB3, located in the southeast corner and along the. north property line (west half), respectively. Organics were detected in boring MW3 and .SB4, located along the south property line (west half), and center (west half), respectively. Nine soil samples were laboratory-analyzed for diesel and, heavy oil using Method WTPH-D/D Extended. One sample, from SB1 was analyzed for hydrocarbon identification using Method Wi7."H-HCID. Field findings were confirmed;diesel was detected at 9,580 ppm in the 7.5' sample from SB3 and at 42 ppm in the 7.5' sample , from SB1. The Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) Method A cleanup level for diesel in soil is 200 ppm. No heavy oil hydrocarbon was detected in these two samples. No diesel or heavy oil was detected in the remaining seven samples. No gasoline was detected in the soil sample from SB1. Excavation of the diesel-impacted soil around SB3 is recommended. On April 16,- 1996, groundwater samples were.collected from the three monitoring wells and laboratory-analyzed for diesel and heavy oil using Method WTPH-D/D Extended. -No petroleum hydrocarbons were detected. Groundwater flow direction was determined to be to the south. . SITE HISTORY In February, 1992, in response to a possible property transfer, GeoEngineers, Inc. identified hydrocarbon contamination in two of eight test pits placed on the vacant lot at 3000 East Valley Road. Using EPA Method 8015 Modified, gasoline was detected at 110 ppm and diesel at 180 ppm in the test pit located in the southeast. corner of the property. Gasoline was detected at 25 ppm and diesel at 99 ppm in the test pit located in the center of the property. Model Toxics Control.Act Method A ' Cleanup level for gasoline in soil is 100 ppm and for diesel in'soil is 200 ppm. Only gasoline was slightly over the MTCA Method A cleanup level in the southeast test pit. Department of Ecology Was notified. A "no further action determination" was given by DOE as documented in their report/follow-up form. Documentation is on file at Department of Ecology, Northwest Regional Office. In March, 1996, GeoTech Consultants, Inc. conducted a geotechnical engineering study of this property to determine its feasibility as a building site. Five test pits were placed. Based on the past detection of hydrocarbons, the owner and developer requested soil sample collection for hydrocarbon analysis. Three soil samples.from separate test pits were laboratory-analyzed for hydrocarbon identification using Method WITH-HCID. Heavy oil hydrocarbon was detected in . two of the samples collected from test pits located along the north property line. Benchmark Development Company ' East Valley Project- Site Amassment Arri iAi .$ A.aaneintRrt. Tee_ fibril. 199S . 9 ' Method WTPH-418.1 was used to quantify the contamination; 620 ppm was detected at five feet below grade in the east test pit, TP-2, and 390 ppm was detected six feet below grade in the west test pit,.TP-4. DISCUSSION . The 3000 East Valley Road property is.a rectangular approximately two-acre parcel. The site is bordered on the west by East Valley Road, on:the east by Route 167 fence line, and on the south and north by private property. The property to the south is used for parking tractor trailers and to the north is used. by a trucking and , equipment company: Historically, asphalt and other road construction.debris were. used as backfill over the native peat material in the property along East Valley Road. In 1992, gasoline contamination was identified in the southeast corner of the property, and in March, 1996 heavy oil contamination was identified along the north end. • Soil Investigation: On April 11, 1996, in an attempt to duplicate previous data and document the type„ of fill material, Nowicki & Associates, Inc. (NAI)' placed nine 'soil borings on the vacant lot at 3000 East Valley Road. The location of the borings were based on the February, 1992 findings of GeoEngineers, Inc, and the March, 1996 findings of GeoTech Consultants, Inc.. Soil 'type was relatively consistent between borings. it consisted of a top layer, approximately eight feet thick comprised of sand and gravel backfill containing wood, concrete, and plastic debris. No asphalt was obvious in the collected samples. This fill material rested Of a layer of brown fibrous peat material varying in thickness from one to three feet. Below the peat was gray silt/clay and black fine sand. Soil types correspond to the Unified Soils Classification Groups, SP,PT,ML or SM, respectively. See the soil boring logs for specific details. . • Boring, SB1 was placed in the southeast corner, in the area where gasoline was detected in 1992 by GeoEngineers in their test pit,.TP-2. Soil samples were collected at 2.5', 5', 7.5' and 10' below grade and field-analyzed using Thin Layer Chromatography(TLC). Minimal amount of diesel and organics were detected in the • 7.5' sample. Laboratory analysis using Method WTPH-D/D Extended detected diesel at 42 ppm; no heavy oil was detected. No gasoline was detected using Method • WTPH-HCID, MTCA Method A cleanup level for diesel in soil is 200 ppm. NO remediation is recommended at this boring. Boring, MW:l was placed in the northeast corner. Soil samples were collected every 2.5 feet from 2.5' below grade to 12.5' below grade. No hydrocarbons were detected using TLC analysis. The boring was converted to a 2" monitoring well set to 14' . . below grade, Laboratory analysis confirmed field findings; no hydrocarbons were , detected in the 5' sample. • -Benchmark Dovolopmont Company • . East Valloy Project-Site Assessment Newirki.$ A98nciateR. Tnr. Anril_ 7996 • • Boring, SB2 was placed along the north property line immediately south of GeoTech, Consultants' test pit TP-2, where heavy oil was detected at 620 ppm, 5' below grade. . Soil samples were collected every 2.5 feet from 2.5' below grade to 10' below grade. No hydrocarbons were detected using TLC analysis. Laboratory analysis confirmed field findings; no hydrocarbons were detected in the 5' sample. • Boring, SB3 was placed along the north property line, west end, between GeoTech Consultants'test pits TP-2 and TP-4. Soil samples were collected every 2.5 feet from 2.5' below grade to 12.5' below grade. TLC field analysis detected hydrocarbons in the sand and'gravel layer immediately above the peat; approximately 8'below grade. Laboratory analysis confirmed field findings; diesel was detected at 9,580 ppm in the 7.5' sample. No hydrocarbons were detected in the 2.5' and 5' samples. Minimal hydrocarbons were detected in the 12.5' peat sample. Diesel in this sample is assumed to have originated from carryover from the previous sample.. Sand was visible around the outside of the peat sample. f. Boring,MW2 was placed along the north property line, east of GeoTech Consultants' test pit, TP-4 where heavy oil was detected at 320 ppm, 6'below grade. Soil samples were collected, every. 2.5 feet• from 2.5' below grade to 12.5' below grade. No hydrocarbons were detected using TLC analysis. The boring was converted to a 2" monitoring well set to 14' below grade. Laboratory analysis confirmed field findings; no hydrocarbons were.detected in the 7.5' sample: Boring, MW3 was placed.in the southwest corner, west of GeoTech Consultants' test pit,TP-5. Soil samples were collected at 2.5', 5', 7.5' and 10' below grade and field- , analyzed using TLC. Minimal amount of diesel and organics were detected in.the 2.5' sample. There was no detection of hydrocarbons in the remaining samples. Laboratory analysis of the 2.5' sample was non-detect. Boring, SB4 was placed west of test pit TP-3. Soil samples were collected at 2.5', 5', 7.5' and 10'below grade and field-analyzed using TLC. Minimal amounts of organics were detected in the 2.5',: 5', and 7.5' samples. No hydrocarbons were laboratory- detected in the 7.5' sample. Boring, SB5 was placed south of test pit TP-3. Soil samples were collected at 2.5', 5', 7.5'.and 10' below grade and field-analyzed using. TLC. No hydrocarbons were detected using TLC analysis. . Laboratory analysis confirmed field findings; no hydrocarbons were detected in the 7.5' sample. Boring, SBG was placed between test pit TP-1 and TP.3. Minimal detection was found'in the 2.5' sample and a sample collected from the auger cuttings. Laboratory analysis of the 2.5' sample confirmed no diesel or heavy oil hydrocarbons., • Benchmark Development Company • `1 East Valley Projoct- Sito Asseesment, , l I. .. _ i T Groundwater Monitoring:, L. ,;r :,,: :• ; ; ; ,; E Three soil borings were converted to Onitorir� �. :` All wells were screened • mi from four to fourteen feet below grade. Factory cleaned P C screen and casing were k:.,3 lowered into the auger and a sand pack was placed around the monitoring well : screens. The tops of the sand pack were all placed two feet above the well screen.. ' The wells were sealed with.one foot of bentonite chips and one foot of cement. Well '`� r. ���:,. t heads were secured with water-proof, flush-to-grade heavy duty monuments. See•. tt. well construction logs for specific details. ' On April 16, 1996, water levels were measured in the three wells, the wells were ,,, developed using a' stainless-steel bailer. Each. well was. purged of over three casing i"';,, volumes of water,field parameters were documented, and groundwater samples were ''1 collected for laboratory analysis using Method WITH-D/D Extended. No , ';: hydrocarbons were detected.. Based on survey elevations to the top of the monument { rim and water-level measurements, groundwater gradient was calculated to be 23.5" per 100 feet. Flow direction is to the south. On April 29, 1996, water levels were rechecked. initial data was confirmed.. LABORATORY ANALYSIS Forty-five soil samples were collected from nine soil borings (three borings were converted to monitoring wells)and field-analyzed for semi-volatile hydrocarbons using Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC). Nine of these samples that had the possibility ,? of containing hydrocarbons as determined by field screening were laboratory-analyzed., , using Method WTPH-D/D Extended. The sample from the southeast corner boring, where gasoline had been identified in 1992 as slightly over MTCA Method A cleanup level, was lab-analyzed for identification using Method WTPH-FICID. Soil samples were collected using a 2.5"inside diameter split-spoon sampler and hand• • tools. Water samples were collected using a stainless steel bailer. Soil samples, . collected for laboratory analysis,were placed into laboratory-supplied precleaned 4-oz glass jars with teflon lids and water samples were placed in laboratory-supplied precleaned vas with teflon lids. All laboratory samples were stored in coolers or ' refrigerated until delivered to TEG Laboratories located at 7110 38th Drive SE in Lacey, Washington. All appropriate sampling protocols were followed and there is nothing to indicate that k i the quality of data or validity of the results were jeopardized. Laboratory results confirm field findings. Diesel hydrocarbons were detected above I MTCA Method A cleanup level for diesel in soil boring 8B2, placed.along the north , property line, west half. No gasoline was detected in the boring located in, the southeast coaxer of the property where gasoline hydrocarbons were identified in 1992, No heavy oil hydrocarbons were.identified in any of the borings. No diesel of heavy oil were detected in the groundwater samples. The attached table summarizes the sample.results. ' Benchmark Development Company • „:• . East Valley Project Site Assessment 5 Neu icki&Associates,1nc. April, 1996 • • • CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Diesel-impacted soil was found in soil boring SB3, located along the north property line, west half, No heavy oil or gasoline was found in any of the. borings. No groundwater contamination was identified. • The following remedial actions are recommended, 1. Excavation of the diesel-impacted soil at boring SB3 with accompanying soil sampling and analysis. , 2. Quarterly groundwater monitoring. 3. Installation of a fourth monitoring well to the south of the diesel-impacted " soil. To be installed after removal of impacted soil, ... I • Arlene N. Van De Wege ' I • Environmental Engineer, XFCI Licensed Site Assessor 3 re 114 `IY r ryl I i • I � j I I Benchmark Development Company T,na4 Vn11nv Prninrt- Site Anaeasment ' TABLE 1: SOIL R A SAMPLE LABORATORY ANALYSIS Sample ID Date Location TPH (rxig/Icg or ppm) Collected WTPH-D Extended diese]/heavy oil SB1-3 4-11-96 rSoil boring 1, SE corner, 7.5' deep 42/nd* ,. MW1-2 4-11-96 Well 1, NE corner, 5' deep nd/nd ' SB2-2 • . 4-11-96 Soil boring 2, south of north nd/nd -. property line, center, 5' deep I SB3=3 4-.11.96 Soil boring 3, south of north 9580/nd �� property line, west half, 7.5' deep 1 MW2-3 4-11-96 Well 2, NW end, 7.5' deep nd/nd MW3-1 . 4-11-96 Well 3, SW corner, 2.5' deep _ nd/nd I SB4-3 4-11-96 ' Soil boring 4; center,. west half, 7.5' ��--- nd/nd SB5-3 •4-11-96 Soil boring 5, east of SB4, 7.5' deep nc3/nd • SB6-1 4-11-96 Soil boring 6, east of SB5, 2.5' deep nd/nd . ` . . . Method Detection Limit 20/40 '— Model Tonics Control Act Method A Cleanup Level 200/200 * - SB1.3 analyzed for hydrocarbon identification using Method Only diesel detected above the 50 ppm method detection limit(MDL). No gasoline or heavy oil above the MDL of 20 ppm and 100 ppm,respectively. 1 ` 'A I,E 2: GROUNDWATER TE SAMPLE LABORATORY ANALYSIS • Sample In Date Location ` ---- TEIi (ug/1 or ppb) Collected WTPH-D Extended MW1 4-16 96 Monitoring Well 1, NE corner ndlnd . MW2 4-16-96 Monitoring Well 2, north . nd/nd I property line, west half ' , • MW3 . 4-16-96 Monitoring Well 3, SE corner nd/nd Method Detection Limit . 200/400 ' Mod_el Tonics Control Act Method A Cleanup Level 1,000/1,000 - • . • Benchmark Developmont Company Eaot Valley Project- Site Assessmont Nowicki&Associates;inc. April, 1996 TABLE 3: WATER-IAE'VEL DATA Date Measured Date Measured Well Well Screened Survey 4-16-96 4-29-96 0 'ID Depth " Interval Elev.* (ft) (ft) (ft) Depth to Water- Depth to Water- Water Level El. Water Level EL (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) MW1 14 4-14 20.53 4.81 15.72 4.51 16.02 MW2 14 4-14 20.55 4.35 16.20. 4.28 16.27 MW3 14 4-14 19.85 5.60 14.25 . 5.34 14.51 * surveyed to top of monument rime north side • TABLE 4: FIELD PARAMETERS Well XD • Temperature Conductance pH degrees F) (umhos/cm) MW 1 509 884 _-� . 7.06 MW2 51.3 2,400 6.17 , MW3 50.5: 1,910 6.77 • Benchmark Development Company East Va11oy Project- Site Assessment Nowicki &Associates,Inc. April, 1996 ;I -J BENCHMARK. DEVELOPMENT COMPANY NORTH I EAST VAILLEY ROAD -- SITE AS SESSMEN', Z ii ti i,1) Route ' .& 167 .. - co 1 I * - ?�e12 X - SB3 * - Mid_ I X - SB2 , i 1 X - SB4 i x - SB5 i I l x - SE6 t X - SSA. * - MI�3 S c I 1 X - denotes soil boring location East Valley�_e': Road - i Y y x - denotes. monitoring well -location Sketch 42 - Soil Boring & Well Locations Approx. Scale I" = 50' - )Vowick}&Associates, Inc 1 t -, - 0 50` . c BENCHMARK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ORTH EAST VALLEY ROAD - SITE ASSESSMENT April 16 F 1996 GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION . L AND GRADIENT CALCULATION I • Rout \ 167 1 I I 1 16.20' 15.72 ' \ l Gradient .= 15.721-14_25' = 1.47 ' ' i 1 \ 75' 75' i1 OR 23.5" per 100 feet 1 ` / MW3 14.25' 1 NEastValley v' le- Road - - denotes monitoring well location Sketch#2- Soil Boring&Well Locations Approx. Scale 1'' = 50' - . NawicId&Assoclat , Inc. .l 1 0 50' YOUNKER PROPERTY WETLAND DELINEATION AND STUDY REPORT oE`i cp `,®F IRtot Prepared For: BENCHMARK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Bellevue, Washington Prepared By: TALASAEA CONSULTANTS Woodinville, Washington May 2, 1996 YOUNKER PROPERTY WETLAND DELINEATION AND STUDY REPORT Prepared for: Benchmark Development Company 5020 141st Avenue S.E. Bellevue, Washington 98006 Prepared by: Talasaea Consultants 15020 Bear Creek Rd. N.E. Woodinville, Washington 98072 May 2, 1996 • Table Of Contents Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 GENERAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LAND USE 1 3.0 METHODOLOGY 1 3.1 Background Data Reviewed 2 3.2 Field Investigation 2 4.0 RESULTS 3 • 4.1 Analysis of Existing Information 3 4.2 Analysis of Field Conditions 3 5.0 WETLAND FUNCTIONS AND VALUES • 4 6.0 SUMMARY ' • 4 References List Of Figures Figure 1: Vicinity Map Figure 2: National Wetlands Inventory Map Figure 3: Soil Conservation Service Soils Map Figure 4: Wetland Map Figure 5: Proposed Site Plan Appendices Appendix A: Data Sheets for Routine On-site Determination Method • Appendix B: Section 4-32-3C of City of Renton Wetland Management • Ordinance _ _ _ YOUNKER PROPERTY WETLAND DELINEATION AND STUDY REPORT (May 2, 1996) 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report is the result of a wetland.inventory and delineation on a 1.78-acre site located in the City of Renton, Washington (Figure 1). The site is proposed for the construction of an approximately 21,000 s.f. auto trim design facility with 96 parking stalls. The purpose of this report is to: 1) describe the wetlands identified and delineated on the property, 2) evaluate the functional values of these wetlands, and 3) identify wetland impacts from the proposed development. Information in ' this report will be utilized by the City of Renton and any other concerned. agencies to evaluate impacts to wetlands from the proposed project. 2.0 GENERAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LAND USE The site is located at 3000 East Valley Highway (Section 30, Township 23N, and Range 5E, W.M.) in the City of Renton, Washington. It is found east of East Valley Highway, west of State Route 167, and north of Imperials Bingo. The site is currently vacant and consists of a mixture of shrubs, grass, and weedy herbaceous vegetation. Dominant species include Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor), Scot's broom (Cytisus scoparius), tansy (Tanacetum vulgare), and reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea). A roadside ditch associated with State Route 167 flows from south to north near the site's eastern boundary. This ditch then flows west along the site's northern boundary before entering a culvert • in the site's northwestern corner. Surrounding land use includes an excavating company and storage yard to the north, a truck storage yard to the south; State Route 167 to the east, and East Valley Highway to the west. 3.0 METHODOLOGY The wetland analysis of the property involved a two-part effort. The first part consisted of a preliminary assessment of the site (and its immediate surroundings) using published information about local environmental conditions. This information included: 1.) wetland and soil maps from resource agencies, 2) critical areas maps from. the City of Renton, and 3) any relevant studies completed or ongoing in the vicinity of the project site. The second part involved a field survey in which direct observations and measurements of soils, hydrology and vegetation were made to determine whether wetlands were present, the type of wetlands present and the extent of their boundaries (see Field Investigation section below). 1 , 1 . -. - - . - . • .. - 1 .• -.4 I I" -• 2:? ..--7---- III • S RENTON VILLAGE PL , 4' ,\11TH ST -cOAR ST ,5,‘,,06•(, . • HOLIDAY t., IS4 '_.1,--?-•- • le 5 INti ›. -cc 2_.- '_-•-• -----.---,;',.s‘ m 0 .1.•••••• ." "—.-''''''''' .....-.-... ---.---- 0 .46:r —405—.--,--'--- -•---- ----- ,, •a .., p.. . t izTA WM;S 'i 2g 7'm<Ism ' z 20 4.'"4., s, et, ,-, •, (s'X' . 0 ' c, 8 . ..-; •e, ' SE-ss, ' ._I _40 16TH ST A. ,.i ., ,,,. ,,, . S 16TH ST' ,,,,CAhh..S s , " . - ,tis ? - • 0 - S " 4111111&_ SE =100' P, 1 -,-w 654 ‹j I 1 . .' '5 17TM no ' fruse4.,..7: ?'. 7' k'''. S 18TH Pt Nr ST F.'' 4'.. z1116.,,, ,67. , ,7",C I I o •-.9 SW 19TH ST t.,...,7A';i! ''' ../'i c?''. ... 2 ST , . . S 19TH I STs 4 9JALBOZ' 0 ..oas k IPUG ET:'C21::: ..;01 : E-LJII, , p; ,z i:,,,,4 ST III; LONGACRES •, 1..1;-•:::4 207H,:q pi.17/111-4 ') S-114 21ST ST \---... . ;c....4 TRACK I'''''• rn r, 13 Y42 E 0 '-‘%``e' ,i,t,,- ..=h SE 21ST ST 'I. zz t..,S! •2ND PL- ED ti) SW 23RD ST S 23RD N ST.5, '1 i ,r,4 — ,-----•:=4,--y-t> • ........I 4...F --- - i.,.., --I •-.......'IIMIIIISITIMIN ...c F.,l-1 ,n p w SE lf SW 'r -2-7TH T Z c7 I n 120 s'\5 , 1,,i 27TH STt"' S 1.•TN - ST SE ST I 15 t 7.4< .,,,,,, -, la 10900 __ 11100 s •P, L17' ,rf • S TH Pl.28TH '13- 1.6.C"- , .% s'',..,".•-,.s.287 -- .1 >. ,- SE 165TH I ,,,,-. c.f, ..., 66TH- Er -,E9T8 r < ST -C W.29TH ST MEM' .19 it'''is.s se si"5ps PI.\ kr,a. ST - -SE 167TH ST SE E u 5W 30TH r 1.1 g - - t. =s i ...-7<- 5^,. 4'4 0.18., 1-- cna E ' i al .4-1 , '-' -c ,,.E _ •-• --.: 41•P?i,:-..W1F2A,n__JE.,, \'""j•,--ar r< -C. 29 PROJECT SITE .'.1 1\s\\--.1691/172,P....L,,, :2 1-CT..- SMETH '97 "- ...,.7 V) g SE 169TH 'L f'', ..-. SE 169TH SE 2(170TH ST ." JI c, LLI ) 1.P1. .4'5'-1671.".- " ' 1."...., • 170TH <1 .. -', 167 L. .,_is;_, SW 4TH sr , I or '.c.. 54 11S 172ND ST DI \ SE .• `,. ND ST -! ,jos.", .• SE i72ND ST " SE 172N sr• ''( .--= ..,..; . . ^. Ss' SE 173110 ST SI '977, • 'MTN ST I _1 -- 37n., , • S 174TH ST '..i! E .174TH ST -4:s......S.„. .- SW 39t1H ST 1 . ,'; Cr I ST 176T ST - LI- • N' •..„, *ST + -s- es SE (el SW g - 41ST ( ST i ,00,., =:•,' tt., La .9 ,,,,.....4-$ = • 1------ I cl * S 17, '7% is SI -'...'' / ''';81/1 Q.I/Ar "r7fL s . - ,e_ 2 C.:: ._.. ..:,'CENTER CO= - - , co SE ,- — — - ."- : =L., -I f.=. SE 17918 . .2.4 F.,.. S E S E 18101.TH:ST/ ,.;.SE l79--;ST Z} CD7ER i 4aware.....514,4,..,...„:j< •0 1 'sr. s...•• ••_.... SE gh.i...................-1,...............,:....0.... Mori • MOTH PL I U'l S.' ,'''''• c, ' MIST ST '....-'a 7.- ty, / 167 ,,,,e%e, _ SE it -... -7",182ND C. ST v, .12( §..1- .,•..4 - SE 183RD < 11-1-1 =1 ' - i..-,,. S 45TN FL iT, ,..1.,, . . ri 31 - ,,,.? aF, ,., sE PL ' 1 *-1 SE. • L.L., SE 184TH." ( I -V ii • 0 It; Lii -., ci, 184TH I , .3 i Ti RE ‘,. SE PL < 186TH ST SE 18- 1 • - 4- -mil 4- s .: • ,. 1 (, .. . . • . SE 187TH .-1 < - 1 • NORTH . , , . All\ . . , Mr SOURCE: The Thomas Guide for King County, Washington, 1995. . . DESIQ-1 • FIGURE 1. Vicinity Map 1 DRAWN ' SO (rift TALAS AEA SCALE F1CURE/DWG NO. N.T.S. -- CONSULTANTS , DAll Resource I.Environmental Planning 4-24-96 134120 Bat Omsk Roil Norshest . %elevate.WaiiroSca 93472 REVISED Bus(206)S.61:7$1,0,Fa(206)id I.1549. ; , . • . - • ' ._ _ . _ __ • - -- -.. . . . .. .--- -• - • " ' -' - ' . , 3.1 Background Data Reviewed Background information was reviewed prior to field investigations and included the following: • National Wetlands Inventory Map (Renton, Quad), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1988 • King County Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey, 1973 • City of Renton Critical Areas Inventory Map, 1991 3.2 Field Investigation . A general site reconnaissance was conducted on March 29, 1996 to gain an overall impression of the existing environment. Observations were made of the general plant communities, wildlife habitats, and the locations of obvious and probable wetland areas. Present and past land use practices were also noted, as were significant geological and hydrological features. Once wetland areas were located, the routine on-site determination method was used to delineate the wetlands using the procedures outlined in both the Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands (1989) and the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (1987). The on-site wetland delineation was completed on March 29, 1996. Plant species were identified according to the taxonomy of Hitchcock and Cronquist (1973), and the wetland status of plant species was assigned according to the list of plant species that occur in wetlands, published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (Reed 1988, 1993). Wetland classes were determined on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's system of wetland classification (Cowardin, et. al. 1979). . Vegetation was considered hydrophytic if greater than 50% of the dominant plant - species' had a'wetland-indicator status- of facultative or wetter (i.e.,- facultative; facultative wetland,.or obligate wetland). Soil on the site was considered hydric if one or more of the following characteristics were present: • organic soils or soils with a histic epipedon (i.e., organic surface layer), • matrix chroma just below the A-horizon (or 10 inches, whichever is less) of 1 or less in unmottled soils, or 2 or less if mottles were present, or • gleying immediately below the A-horizon. Indicators of wetland hydrology may include, but are not necessarily limited to: . . drainage patterns, drift lines, sediment deposition, watermarks, stream gauge ' data and flood predictions, historic records, visual observation of saturated soils, and visual observation of inundation. . An evaluation of the vegetation, soils and hydrology was made at various locations along the interface of wetland and upland. Wetland boundary points 2 _ • were then determined,from this information. Wetland boundaries were marked with flagging and surveyed. 0 Appendix A contains data sheets prepared for representative locations in both the uplands and wetlands. These data sheets.document the vegetation, soils, and hydrology information that aided in the wetland boundary determination. 4.0 RESULTS 4.1 Analysis of Existing Information National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps developed by the US Fish.and Wildlife Service (USFWS, .1988) indicate that a Palustrine, Forested, Seasonally Flooded, Excavated (PFOCx) wetland exists along the eastern edge of the site (Figure 2). The City of Renton Critical Areas Inventory does not indicate that any wetlands exist on the site. Since these maps are only general inventories, and because wetland areas change over time, actual field investigation was necessary to ensure that any and all wetlands were identified. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), . formerly the Soil Conservation Service (SCS), has mapped the western portion of the site as Urban Land (Ur) and the eastern portion of the site as Tukwila Muck (Tu) (Figure 3). Urban land consists of soil that has been modified by disturbance of the natural layers with additions of fill material several feet thick. Tukwila muck consists of very poorly drained organic soils that have a seasonal high water table at or near the surface. 4.2 Analysis of Field Conditions One wetland area (Wetland A) was identified and delineated along the_ eastern and northern portions of the project site (Figure 4). The eastern portion of this wetland consists of a large roadside ditch associated with State Route 167. • Drainage in the'ditch flews--both from south to north and north to south before.e.ore.,_ turning west and flowing along the site's northern border. A culvert located at the northwest corner of the site extends;a distance of approximately 1/2 mile where it discharges to -Springbrook Creek:- The total on-site portion of this. wetland is 10,118 s.f. Vegetation in the steeply incised ditch wetlands consists largely of dense monotypic patches of cattail (Typha sp.), with soft rush (Juncus effusus) and young willow (Sa/ix sp.) along the wetland edge. The on-site portion of the wetland buffer consist of compact fill and is dominated by Himalayan blackberry (Rub us discolor), black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) saplings, Scot's broom (Cytisus scoparius), common tansy (Tanacetum vulgare) and reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea). Much of the ditch bank has been reinforced with rock and concrete chunks. 3 . . . ... _ _. . . . . .. . .. . . _ • . ... ., ._. .. . - .. . IRig% ‘,, • ‘' -ii--13-------•• ., . I ••••••••• • 1 . ‘. 111.%*••••• 1 1 i 4/' , *..-:•* *t:. 1 ;( • i ••;';,•iff .. •" :•:::,_ , I •1 ' I f:',•1 riff) ••Golf ourse \ I -7.:-'"-:' ... } ..`8 • it ' /A 1 1..• -- sIst.v. /fr. • '.i.:::.,.:,.; ...,-,:. . 'lk • : . • R21.15,14 . ...•I I@ ';::il: j•I V ",gx --- ---7.=-: •••-'.-7-•-j d- ..-._00.-- .-. 1 , . . ?- :::: .4 :',.:',-:•:.'-,..",:...i . C- '.• 'LIB . i.,-- PU5Krx ' ••------- -'-:•-__,,„,.----=7-;"--7. . Z . ! i 1•11'. 351,.....-1."4. f 41:10 --t--7-1 .ewage ... ..:-.-_.... "-"_ ---- -'--. -I• .•••••1' 1, •..z.7.-- ..•',. . 01 •I \ lori.::...7-1-4F-•*--.--.• -Z"-N•1N. gro7.f.'--...1.. .i.,..:..,. --7: ------ !.."1. 11011-IdgiPikih.. Alli.;:... -.'i • ....':-. . i 'i F \\ \\-----"----$". -------%-- . - itid*--;----;;• ..iii. , ;:,!, ,,___ , • . i . •--- . ' -N4IFV741041411141! 1 -'s- • • ‘., . `...-11 ' ''' ' N .... • ' *•:!- • Isi,DeL, , ' - ,..0:\:. 1 ?'---- „:.41..,0*' ,,,iliE., :_i_L___t_' ..' .. .;_•: ''' ....... :" • ;Or --- 4-419N-Nti 1. !,... :: "e 'iii-a iit1110 / Tal.i.,•A -'' II /4 li . - iI16 • . I; •ii il t 4‘ IM7 • t' )1.1 ••••,.,.;..:.: ... . ;.....„. lro. ,: ,v4..11, . „ t.k. ;• . ik. ,i,1-t. ' r"\\.=0; it pEhic PS5F •/ \ i 0.0-0A il,,,,.. i..s.:..(/ . :--:-.-:,. ,itri • 4 • , j • -4( ... ...;,‘,. i.ongacre 1 1 1 ' '1.1,Fgc_...___ , \,,, .1 _11.,,. Akiki i• .,„A it . .). Ea , - Wit, ':::. 1 r,intz, - MAC, , i ..,?..,_. .• • i i . !!‘._____:_ ., .,(7 ;ii... ti ;___.7.Op Is: R/Bcel in,m • • 1'1 .1.a no PSSF Itt.14SF ' t" n II _.... 1 1 : i • Sr' 1 11 \\ • • ..AM" Id - 1 k ...... :,..- . Trad5 "-- • - . .. ,,..,_ _1-,___./....,,....___ _ •_ 1 r ,4 s.,.-„....„.;,-.1,......1 . _ PuBH . _ .,, ' -,:.,__. •,*...,trh.,._:...:_isi____...... _ ‘,..„.... ti i p., .1 IL ..,•-• PSSF . . yr c •e40,---14 PI .„. uil , \ gie p;mc.c ] ..1 pFof„ a 'es• voir \\I\\ • 1 pm l' .. • . ..---- ,lit„..........=, v PEMC•• • I `.... i ..-...•VI.ftil / A i isr.i. 1)•- .." • •"-.•:.:. -'.--•... k.. . . . PS5C it wI. • .... =•••-..... IA . . . II ' "II"I•'•ViLf./ 4 :., 'PFOC. . ITT . Ft-tiff ' _, 1 • . r,,)• • .: . 1 iti \ I MC .PFOA:.i... WIN a _ r "(,,,/ 41 i I MI .,• , PEIAC • .. „ ip s s cPF 1 Ea p <.. ...:7, .'12: i: , I - . '.30 tit g • ,EA., 1.::-.,,-.,...- - . ....:1 . 14 Ct PROJECT. SITE 1• - ii w I 4 •1' Sc I "- -Ti•-)."-.---.12 . .- •• k,1. ,,.,%..,. \... I I; PFOC r, v. i• - 11'.\:.• PAS •••••„... 1. • i 1, m .. 1 ?.. )44.. . ._ 1 SSC .-1 11‘■ 11 ..\ : : • • ( 11,=== === 1 . :':?Deo it )IA. .. ! . •1\ir. ill...." 1 r F1FOC. 5:71 i 1 • *- 'IL ••••• . ' 1 PEM 11 1! ! 1•!'f_41•111- • • I 1 ll _I - (1111 : It IX I • 5 4•:-!'•:7 li=or, •le P Id c PUBlix .i," • • .1 '. W-1."I • • ! , . 1:K.:KW._ i114116. r.:.. • 17 __ . • 1 I. \T• .F6A- pirr . ./ : . .. - = •--- ' 1-:-i ,I I /II iir:-.4.4al II?.. - 1.11:.;..10-, P55Cx 111 . lit • ill ‘ Atilla .' . ig- P5F,H. , : i . 'A %44 Orillia - rn• 11 :1 .,. _ lig •--- -L- \ ? :, • L. ::. i 1iv r . • I k --- c' • ..`.v \ 1..3 iT 11 •V • PEMC "..:V.9.:, O-,I ' •-22. 15C%•.. 1 r//... I 4 ' ' - - (i-N - 1-- I-• ••-•016N1‘., ::-.1-.-g, '11 Is'i=- ;::•;.•"' .1+ P'-e) 1 •it ' A 4411 .- - • .. • 11 , '4F.a \ •...-:. -' • „_ „ .. . 1 -'••'•• let.q, fp _. , ;111 • &17 "'• • /IC 3\ . 1 . it ..- . - . i• I - - -P55A 41 i • PE.I.1-E. ......- • MAL 7-i - • '-1: ..// .I.:'1.:---";:1;.. r\ .;4_, .... , . , .... . , • . • NORTH • . LEGEND . : . PFOCx Palustrine Forested Seasonally Flooded Excavated 411111k . • , .. . .. SOURCE: . National Wetlands Inventory Map, Renton girl Quadrangle, 1988. . • - • . . I,,,,,,,,, DESIGN! DRAWN ( I -\ - FIGURE 2. National Wetlands I -SO .," TALAS AEA Inventory Map SCALE F1GURE/DWGNO. . • • =2000'. •. ‘,\•-••,---• CONSULTANTS . • DATE , . . ' Resource&Environmental Planning 13020 Bar Crock Rad Hallesst - 4-24-9 w,...,WrFinisers11072 - • • • . . \4.. Bus Oa)11414230.fu COQ Rd IMO' . REVISED . } . . . . i . . • • , . . • ' .. . . . t , _ , . , • . . I b� BIB\ + BeC Golf�Course Ur I - + - 41c\- '—; Amt Wo T I -a. -- . — ■ I 1Rip • �` • �•4 . 1 2 ,�;I 3p;-4 O14 •11* Sew.ge 0RTNE., - iir • • % . -., I i' •- --- =- Si , ■�tt I Ng \ I / �' ®�ditill° g AgC • Ur •]�4 11=/e :M 16 , 9\ l• i::1 . : i „, q- ^ ir C . 1', \ rY ICI•`or r .:: / „ • .' I i I li •. Pu nr-.' r '•�� ;Longacre4lei_ (/! • ••�i. I R,aeE 1 In 'Ii' 6,BeC I ....% 4I Uri _" i J Ur 1'" ` Wo BeD II! •.n :� n `L i F, i �_ ay- • • �i• •:II• , i AgD 1011 `�• '. o k«�Track it \ U • • 'o Y__.} —3 1-r '''� — t� I--- ` -- - -- i — — n. — '' B • • —Y— ------ ,_ ti ii i I 1 u Ur- t ee Uri I I I ,J Ra rvoir" p° 1 r- W : • ��— •• ■� �2 So Tu z ••• 11�� — m Z ~•r• •- • 71 - 00 ' W • Pu r m Sk '• 1 = • L wo • Q:M go I I c �' '� I ►• :0 \--=' . IBM 29 . .' �'� ���vs 1 25 �� �203P OJ CT SITE I AgC Il j Py ' i �" 1 _ _ .. •:a:3 _ Ur.: J_ �: - — Tu .:._ 1 r• l ▪ :▪ ® • A VI .. 7. Vh" n u` • So. :MI,17 J y�j``I y Wo 9M�94 t' I __ - I■ 1� it _ _ ' I 11� •,i Irv. � ., `•" . '��F per,,•• •t - \ _ •l ,,:;AgC:,.s":�• .•• fru .iNkJ: iir_'.‘__INIPP--- � i • -_-__-- ". - '7-. .4:'..... .: : ( :7T-it% -: .. ...,..„-::::,:-;_ 4 4-An. _ ,... _ . •-IBM M ••= - - 3 } wo • AgC• i t .• I `. y0 I•. `3I fITda 1 r am • I c•. - 1` `"`1"_ :H - 3 t80• I ' f. LEGEND - NORTH UR Urban Land TU Tukwila Muck AI, SOURCE: King County Soils Survey, 1973. • DESIGN DRAWN '� FIGURE 3. Soil Conservation SO TALAS AEA Service Soils Map SCALE ''G" '°W° ° CONSCONSULTANTS- 1"-2000 '� '' Resource&Fsvironmental Planning ise20 Sew Cm cR•.1T:•ia+et 4-24-96 w«Esc w.F:10m)"I REVISED \ m(7\ B0oIQ1.7:�O,Fa pOt)76.7N9 . . .. . . . ' • • • . i • ...-7' 11.,-, ,..,' - - I ', . • : ' • 4 f . • : .- .,.... , - . I ..... . \ . 0 •..,... i I.CX...0 _.........._...-------„X• n.,.,.,,,, .•I..A-•••' . .r P.,••••1.8."•7.0 r• „z.... a.,,,_,,, .,.1.n.7.,..„4„..____...,,_,,,..___. ...___,,,......___7_______7,_ . .. .... • iti1/47„ :......''' ;ne,.:-.., ;;. ."..... .i1)i,L,,,,,:,,:::,,. ,..;17 .--•*••••,-4.„,. ,.:.,„, ,,,„„ ,= =:„::::::::4,::;;:;:;.;:;i:Ii;:i:,i,:.;;;;:;:;:;:iIIIII!CiiI]iii;;;;; ,,gg,i,isaR:::].iiIIIIR: i;iFi*i::,i:I*:::I ;iiMi;i;i;i;:, -'''-" !%-- --:'-'m':°:'''' :'-'-'-''-'w'''':' '''' ' ' --.''''''''''''-- ..... .:.''. .f.'. .=& =:.,,...• • I '14 . ' •• ••• 11.:.••::•'''''--- ...•::::....... ...................................................................... ...,•-,•••• •......., • . •• --- --------- 4.2 :.:-:•:.•„••:,',.:1.•...:::::::],..,:.;.•,..:i-i,,,,,,,,:i..:.::::;....:;.;:.:,,,, . .••;-::iN• ;.• iim ., • . ••• - • .....,, ..= TEST PLOT #1 . . .- e. • ---------z-z- •-••••••;.;:;:::::::. ;,i,,,,,,,!,igi:. .... . II .:7-1",7-:''''7•cul..,•''' ..... ; . ....._ ......•.• ......... • ... ..e4 .---.-- TEST,7 #2 PLOT i. : . . •gm • .! .. '''„Ir ""*" • NAY 4I.JUSJ P • . A WETLAND- \\Iii 4., . , t ... • , . . • ..1..:....,,,:.:...k, , ...:. . • I :- • • . F . , i,,.,.. . fP 0,. :III. i . . • . . . , . •,s tr . . . .. ....,: • . . . ••2.2., ••• KII . . • Il....' , v,..Y. , - -- v...y.• . • i$ l .., ,:,...a, .. • ..•,.......... ....... ...... ... . . P :..... . — . ........ . . ' • . . ,-- •• •• •••......- _____Y.-- . .IS OF DEARING&RECORD OF SURVEY . A, RECORDED UNOER AF,9111089007 RECORDS CF • . KG CO INUNTY WAINGTN.SHO F. d •, DAWN:0 TY OF RENTON. A 46.BENC3411a.RX:DU 1544. TON OF 2 muss MX SET IN , CONCRETE UON,AT INTERSECTION Cl E.VALLEY ROAD , . AND S.W.34TH.STREET. -N .'i:-... LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF R .ECORD: • .....z.., NORTH THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF . or THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION . ' 30. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 5 EAST. N.M..' IN RING CDUNTY.WASHIWITON. SCALE: 1"=50' LYING WEST OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO.5 AS CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF . wAsHiNGTON. BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AuDiToR'S FILE NO. 5346371. AND BY • (I-'.. ' . . . , • DEED FILED WITH THE REGISTRAR. UNDER AUDITORS FILE NO. 5349650 AND . • EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET FOR ROAD Km omod AS 92NDAVE. S. de .,... 1115111°1541111.1"1Wil . -2. SOURCE: Group Four, April 1996. Inc., . 0 26 _ . . ... • . . . . . . . • . . . _ . FIGURE 4. Wetlands Map DESIGN DRAWN•SO ..s, } TALASAEA SCALE . FIGURS/DWGI,R1 , ' CONSULTANTS • , DATE • ' i E ScResource Environmental Planning• S 4-30-96 4 . ' 13020 Dor am,R o ad Norttagoat ' . WeNSrtvilIe.Waah/N6 on SISO 72 '. ' REVISED di ' Bug(2 06)S61•7330.Fax(2 06)2614349 . . • ............ , . - , . . . . At the time of the field investigations, the entire wetland was ponded with from 6- inches to over 3 feet of water. Soils were assumed to be hydric based on the presence of wetland hydrology. Wetland A receives storm drainage from the project site, surrounding developed properties, and State Route 167. . Water quality conditions in the wetland are likely degraded to a level consistent with receiving waters in other similar urban areas. It is our understanding that Wetland A is considered a stormwater conveyance ditch by the City of Renton. According to Section 4-32-3C of the City's Wetland Management Ordinance (see Appendix B), created stormwater conveyance ditches are not regulated as wetlands by the City. Wetland A would therefore be considered unregulated by the City and would not require a buffer. 5.0 WETLAND FUNCTIONS AND VALUES Wetlands, in general, provide many valuable ecological and social functions, ' including stormwater storage, water quality protection, groundwater recharge and discharge, and wildlife habitat. The wetland on the project site generally has a relatively low functional value due to its small size and disturbed condition. It .appears to function primarily as a stormwater treatment and conveyance system for road runoff. The wetland provides some water quality value by removing sediments, excess nutrients, and other chemicals from the stormwater runoff associated with the site and the surrounding developed areas. In addition, the wetland also has a limited stormwater storage capability that slows water down prior to its release downstream. Although wildlife habitat within the wetlands on the site is limited by the surrounding developed areas and relative isolation of the ditches, the wetlands are still utilized by a variety of birds, small mammals, and other species of wildlife. Wildlife species observed during the field investigations -included mallards, common snipe, and muskrat. 6.0 SUMMARY The proposed project consists of the development of an approximately 21,000 s.f. auto trim design facility with 96 parking stalls (Figure 5). One wetland area (Wetland A) was delineated along the eastern and northern borders of the site. It is our understanding that this wetland is considered a created stormwater conveyance ditch by the City of Renton, and would therefore not be regulated as a wetland by the City. The proposed project does not require that the ditch be filled. However, due to the narrow width of the site, and safety and other factors associated with an automotive service facility of this type, it is necessary to extend the paved. surface up to the top of the ditch bank. This would allow an entrance/exit 4 2 • I I . / 1� I 2 6 1 E I J __ PROPOSED BLDG 18,000 SF 1ST FLR 3,000 SF 2ND FLR 1 96 STALLS N 9 �- I1 L......_ 19 , \ .— LAN U5CAI-E NORTH SCALE: 1"=50' lb....isomitimm4szawo a SOURCE: LDG Architects, April 1996. o ' 25 50 loo • / DESIGN DRAWN ' �1 FIGURE 5. Proposed Site Plan SO li limp TALAS ABA SCALE 1"-50,FIGURE/DWG NO. CONSULTANTS DATE Resource&Environmental Planning `#A_n A24 r96 13020 Ber Creek Rod NoeU,ea.t w....5.01,Washington 98072 '. • Boa poo 861.7330,Fu CM 8614349 ED. roadway to be constructed on both sides of the building to enable smoother drive-through flows, as well as to provide access for fire control vehicles. Long-term water quality in the ditch is expected to be similar to pre-development levels, since all stormwater from the, proposed development will be routed away from the ditch, pass through oil/water separators, detained, and then treated in a biofiltration swale prior to discharge to the stormwater conveyance system approved by the City of Renton. 5 • References Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S.. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior. FWSOBS-70/31. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual: Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss. Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation. 1989. Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S.D.A. Soil Conversation Service, Washington, D.C. Hitchcock, C.L., and A. Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press.. 730 pp. Munsell Color. 1988. Munsell Soil Color Charts. Kollmorgen Instruments Corp., Baltimore, Maryland. Reed, P.B. Jr. 1988. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). USF&WS Biol. Report 88. Reed, P.B. Jr. 1993. Supplement to: National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). USF&WS Biol. Report 88. Renton, City of. 1991. Critical Areas Inventory Map. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. June, 1991. Hydric Soils of the United States. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil-Conservation Service, King County Area Soil Survey. 1973. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1988. National Wetlands Inventory Map, Renton Quadrangle. Washington State Department of Natural Resources. 1994. Endangered, Threatened and Sensitive Vascular Plants of Washington. APPENDIX A DATA SHEETS FOR ROUTINE ON-SITE DETERMINATION METHOD I, - . . • . DATA FORM • ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD1 Field Investiga r(s): 11/4t-1i t_"ry Date: Project/Site: s TON)`l KC.. F`6rN.Y?G'`1 Slate: t'`A County: f=tr�“:7 ' Applicant/Owner: [23r=�L.60'''AgK- Plant Community gMame: ' I • Note:'H a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook. Do normal environmental conditions exist al the plant community? Yes Y.. No. (If no, explain on back) - Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes X No • (If yes, explain on back) C.l-t►1,.►,�:L tz�i, i-071"?'t' - 1' t -- VEGETATION - j(jATvy• Indicator Indicator ' �(24ti,E. Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum 11 .1. TYyl-\r a VS t t r.i;c; ..G St-- ti:P. 11. , 52. 51ZX S;-4tbvi•<< 1:A(_(Al 54;z'' 12. 3. 13. 4. 14. • 5. 15. 6- 16. • _ . _ 7. • 17. - 8. 18. • 9. - 19. 10. 20.• Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAO l "'ro Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met?. Yes )C No • _ . 1 `Rationale: • ' '? c7-%-•cAc_ .OP:.'":.tip—c—t-E FZ• -- . SOILS , Series/phase Subgroup:2 Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes ' No Undetermined c .. Is the soil aHistosol? Yes No Histic epipedon present? Yes• No ':. Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No Gleyed? Yes • ' No • Matrix Color:' .. Mottle Colors: ' Other hydric soil indicators: Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes ?C No Rationale: . Soii.S ASSviAf.> t3P.SE- e,z tk1'•DR0I-0&Y . HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Yes j( No Surface water depth: 1- 61.- Is the soil saturated? •Yes : No Depth to free-standing'water in pit/soil probe hole: - • List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes X No • Rationale: • • cJURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND_RATIONALE - • . Is the plant community a wetland? Yes jC • No . • ... _ Rationale for•urisdictional,decision: . - - r, z: • .1-This data form can be used for the:HydricSoil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community `' Assessment Procedure, :. ... 2 Classification according to'Soil Taxonomy.' -. B-2 - DATA FORM , - ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD1 Field Investigator(s): At--'Ff"�1 f\►- Date: -�1- �' Projec'JSit-e: j`(0JrJ44-ef-10-E4\3Ton1 State: l'°A County: Isgek k1/40C: ' Aoplicent&Owner: C..'atkt"t�N-21r--. Plant Community n/Name: # Z- • - • Note:• if a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook. Do normal environmental conditions exist al the plant community? Yes No (If no, explain on back) Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes X. No • • (If yes, explain on back) C±O`M`2 C-•T r1t-1-- . .-P 0 • VEGETATION Indicator Indicator r E,ts.l'(' Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species , Status Stratum c' 1. Robs cll,coloc 'tc.0 Sitg°5 11. • 2S2 C-y-4ts�>S Scc.,-ec,,;,..15 Is)t_• 12. 2-S3, 6HrQS-1•i5 te-n4-;1S fAC- 13. _) 4. `v`,.,\m-ls ACV, t,l..:?'N C ItkC-l13 14. • . 1<-5, 't a4-uw vvt.3tire . Ni ' 15. • 6. - 16. 7. 17. 8. - 18. • • . a 19. . 10. 20.• Percent of dominant species that are OBL•, FACW, and/or FAC '10 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? • Yes No ?G .. .- •Rationale: • .i • .f.1071- :'': j t/o :::::try(_'.•. r jt i.4T -t-.;Grp• • • - -. 7 .• . t • SOILS , Series/phase Subgroup: .. 2 : .. • .- -- - Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes ' No Undetermined • • Is the soil aHistosol? Yes No • Histic epipedon present? _Yes' No •• _ Is the soil: Mottled? Yes • No •• Gleyed? Yes • • No - • Matrix Color: Ga‘..`47 17:•�`- .: — Motile Colors: ' • Other hydric soil indicators: Is the hydric soil criteion met? Yes No Rationale: - 1= tit_ HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth: - Is the soil saturated? .Yes ':. No)_ Depth to free-standing water in.pit/soil probe hole: • • List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation. Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes 7'( No Rationale: • . N O t_-J \� ._i.!C.-C • 0.F `4.,�1•,vi. ..A-�Ud-oc i k.,r1 - • JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND_RATIONALE • Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No K = . Rationale for'jurisdiciional decision: : -"— I;r'-;c.:;i •'C(L:,k.ce., •ryrt :JE,(-sr:,..'e.,-a;;A. f`rJ• - I.ft-C:< : L' 14'411JE:rj1a'7/ 1-This data form can be used for the:Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community Assessment Procedure. - -. 2 Classification according to'Soil Taxonomy.' • B-2 APPENDIX B SECTION 4-32-3C CITY OF RENTON WETLAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE (Approved March 9, 1992) ORDINANCE -NO._ .4 3 4 6. utility . and other 'use permit, or any. subsequently adopted permit or required approval not expressly" exempted by this chapter. B. Maps and Inventory. The approximate location and extent of. wetlands in the City of Renton is displayed on the Renton Wetland Inventory Map. The . Map is to be used as a guide to the general location and extent of wetlands . For the purpose of regulation, the wetland edge should be determined pursuant to Section 4-32-3 .C. Wetlands, which are defined in Section 4-32-3 . 0 but not shown on the Renton Wetlands Inventory, are presumed to exist in the City of Renton and are also protected under all the provisions of this chapter. . C. Wetlands Definition and Determination of Regulatory Edge. 1. Wetlands are those lands transitional between terrestrial and aquatic systems that are inundated or saturated by ground or surface water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support and, under normal circumstances, do support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. For the purpose of regulation, the exact location of the wetland edge shall be determined by the wetlands specialist hired at the expense of the applicant .through the performance of a field investigation using the procedures provided in the following manual: • Federal Interagency Committee for . Wetland Delineation. 1989 . Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. . U. S Army Corps of Engineers, U. S. Environmental . Protection Agency, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U. S.D.A. . Soil Conservation Service. -Washington D.C. . Cooperative Technical, Publication. 76 pages plus appendices. Wetlands created or restored as ipartiof . a, ymit �ation ,ECYtioN project are regulated wetlands etlarids ?=intei;t_:,ona ily ��5 �.q....._ ,.•1s1.fiiT'ti ��A'i. ':i et'X v-- ...J`L..F<--.-- C.`.': 1dA���r . .:�� uYi•' Pcreated y for< ' 'ur oses -:other- ahan i=wetland-w m t gat on, P p 's �.s . s�fx �..w.�:.,;,' ..: . . -; . �'r�y" to 1nanagemenE_T includ ngq butt rio srl: mited:- to; stor w .� y ,"4.4%* ,,/ tkkast'ee� re tmeri, orgAandscpg%.aam ni, :consi'dereftreg ateck, rid . 2 . Where the applicant has provided a delineation of the wetland edge, the City shall review and may render adjustments to the edge delineation. In the event the adjusted edge delineation is contested by the applicant, the City shall, at the applicant's expense, obtain the services of an additional qualified wetlands specialist to review the original study and render a final delineation. _'- A final wetlands delineation is valid for two years. `- ) 6 . PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT AUTOTRIM • • BY SITE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES • 310 208TH ST SE BOTHELL 98012 481-9687 May 27, 1996 RECRIVED ._AY 2P .1996 DEVEr_OPmLi:i PLANNING CITY OF REN T ON SECTION I PROJECT OVERVIEW Cr PROJECT OVERVIEW This section summarizes all of the Core Requirements. Any applicable Special Requirements will also be discussed. The project consists of 1.76 acres, which is currently uoccupied. Because an existing drainage swale exists on the east and north sides, the development area is only 1.5 acres. Of this, under one acre is subject to vehicular travel; therfore, no water quality facility is required beyond the use of a biofiltration swale. - V4 I1 ! s /�.. 0l•'—... •/ "7• , „y I.r 'I . _, . . 6?I A ,- 11 `�`,. 'IRK DR .B ,L $I1,1:. y�1 0 C r/!�_�'rO�Ni o r' AY S' / m S �•,p �/let I I v tiyb••�V, • _I .-._.I PAP.K Y t ..."• .. s--.-.$-I, ��. .;�.., t[-_.._.- - N"' I,",• a•' sy '(N----i----" tn'I �^ -r.--I-{ � �? �.. _- x fvs 1TH AY, S I I Alum '. PARK 1` Y • '.,a el t 4-' •�S 4C-. ! AC• 1' - . v . ..k y\1 ---a _ 1 N v��. d Y l=!s 1' /` ., �"' .fir- "1 I 66i11 -, A� ' 'zR�, I 'a�` �,�v's`,:? 1 �h_:rnY[H I�._.-__._._PA[J Er 1 1. t \` k F 1-4' ..._-. -- ��gq N4,�;,• �NlxAr;� WEST VALLFY 1 ''' C a; _ "_. —._. • • (.. >� �.. i. q IYl4 HWY W!i �r s. vise. i •M -' l' i?!;•tnLlm. As' s-• 1`' 1 ��1-.c• ` ` 1 ,n ? 111 AY r u.. i`} '� Mr 'A I ,.r'"La'• '. . / .,+,•r47 %r,A 'Y• t, C .yi-n _ . eSI 6 . �^ _ ;.1 .:.'._: �.: .�iy I► slr�.s ,Y' d 2c ; T"f" • 5 .__ ,H S ,c �A• A'it. i. •` .t7 - •c• ' • ..-IG RO • -----i AV '.". ''s ?K^ "' ,li asi \A_y-• • _.i.r Z .` ..y___' s' ,n r rT., ',Li•--'---'-i,n'-- �S p11 .A3lltlA 115�JM nvK r. AS. :••,l"•\;T..i• .. rr••s .1;A I 4 ---- -:*Li-!T! Y.- ._.-.. _ _, il I '-'-•-- --•-•'-+ -r-. _ g _. . , , .-^-.� ._ + .• • 3+ib,elyi'-.r_._ a'y \'FC,.AY s ,., ` M:,Ar5 ; . SIPAPy' v. '_ `\�j _•tr / , 7 Si- VH14Lr 12 i JAEY!1•N \. A. s�: „'y t.—. q1�L .5.- .--%•- q ' fi • ELnmvi ty_ Ai•_ •" _"'tk' i '-J' , - .EIM•AY s � '� I ,s ' _ � Ii-----' • .-..___. ._.. �_---- i r /� / r 1_Cr�J7H Et11M AY 5 �tpi .r fiBts�t Y S ; O� Wle g i(c,: 6 r V/ , rK1/1C,Av sY _e_ ! •-! • ''4r' \w4y, ,�� ,• • ` MIL Y a a r ,a a to ,� pets:, Ay sr L -- i - . t ' k 94 TH I: 2 I AY S I� I 5 1 M i I txuus AY s11 r... ;it �21, t i m �a. m ,� �, .�„ m MYMOHO s Av SY. .. $ i r,rx Ar s 1 84THI BSTN AV S' I .. ,.. 'AY'L � Irl s•NECA I _ o 9 ^ Z r AP it 'F '4' E ^��,.1+1 i i to • r i l 1 �I TH AV .1__!J....,....41 Lq eenl,AV, S LIND I I f �A, 4 •AV S . : . L" '�Lrn rN AV .�1 s, a ! 'n (( A LIND I AV SW I I L1NDIu4V, iAy SW yo FiiY �_�• la i - u/nw' t a q Y r -- - 1 +_ - u!oi At G1 Ar sv -v snrt ` Ar.. be 1P K 1 : i r O._..VA C•1Fy L� wilt�,-�I �,' Gii� .�, •+rq, (rG 9 art, lIXO AY 40 j , w x \ p IO� pXiPu deaAvetv 4. 4 L ,� -AlI ._ I• @ EAT pCA�: AY. wB A i s N- .„----I----o R�SIY 1- .. t IE VAL EY =1 R A y 7� I c.4 ` •V. AV k- cA. .,It !a .1-' i r( ll RL ' weir y ', 1 s ' 4 '�7]rD f CAPR RD • \ Nam`^ ' I ,n n l.1dn } FL . I 1 i •.f MI. .: VIM z N AV9/TRAY S 'PL s - _ , r, c 1 ),/ [n�'', y/ER I'I!O' <r s ,� R1 r ` { �ter=— S 74,01: i.■ Q T ' RIA A ,n i;aN4" - C�N;Y,m, :id4 Mn o TALBOTRD 5 Ia a ;n r � � A4r7�+ A sent In 5 vN�B .�`. I o g y (r.� i «-- ._._._._.... te. ,e .— 4�1��s o-___. -9 ��.f[a'! ps r 7e ; '-- ®`\'; �� W.:---ICI.. �� �� i IAITIIC►A ® !llrrrSSSnnng ,., .'a•� te�IN AV`' �. ,..:1!,,,.. rq AID o^,. /'I 4 r,• r 'I E.: 7naAls 1Av s ? '` ` �' I� B Si W.-C r 7"' lel ," I 'i ,Ar1r'r,Ca ,� i ;J J3.'" MIS 11iMI ,� �ro ,• � �1!`7.�•�-LDGAN I �: 1-%'r N [r riffs !; A =� DI v s'^ �''e EQ. ? ,y�, ar A �� �NrLiIN \ ( ". �' d� AV S 1 t i� ' AV t� SIR tetiL '� PL - '�''a nre ` kex y°-� ,�' •_1LLIM6 1•\®� -i s q'+' k an a r _#'--- - I '7 •a 4,'�� r.S J ~-'• Qi1R R '-' WF999 a°�Im / r4 ILl AY Fu A IP,R n v 1 is 1Mr �. y I��21tD p`.SE •� ,102H� Iy AV YLlls :r• Q ar• n L , c..SE Tar n i",-~� v R, 7 us ,�tvlr% NOSN3D iU11H _y t. k S�/^'LIANS • t. ✓ m YsE IWRD VL SE • I• 7R Iq r� i PCk q A. �1 r, 3 s , - 7.___1 - �, ELLS_ tarx T' 1 I.i R'I I 107R0 AP I li A� < 4 y - Av S Euy � � n S C[DAR AY F CEDAR E•^ Ar sE IO RI PL SE '1041N t S 19 •—-^—-- Sf 100111 AV E ___- g___ ----'- resr xtNFOH Y-•.r Eye I �� y tarx AV sE •P o-- ->�O`.I `__ IOSTIF,1YiFA q -_. lmrx `sr 7 UN AY''SE '" __ S 'a - ��N \� 10(iTH,AV SE , M•__A q 9TL ,� -1 '^ fAuxi G4ROI I MD_pl SE ,Inr,,vi, 1 t y� ., 1Y x1 ►�i n-Y i•srps ^•1 III AY SF 3 � GRAM d>- ..'HT! AY �•R'- * •Y 1xML AY max' .aq .��. mpg/ AY]:• a 108TH AV SE k a >Q 108TH ' A` n ,.h, ' •nits^Av s ': ,,.�I.. vt ti `u`. ` NB SE MU, -- 4 I A I ;.,. I 110TH AY1SE \r�,As PI 4.- pi, ��rr�_ 7R` L' :u taLiA�s uS �SL,yy�: =y "si I f.r k IOnx Ar f( �h 1097H aAV SE r^31 ep v ST iR 6. •' p A b(� q m 1.4 r ^{' ' ssror yr qHr:un r \.5 J�\' PO „� a`� am I I I 14 Ila,x AV S[ '�I g k `� /'�`'+ r t� 8 @r V 4f ;amp s[ 3 v 7 a L� r +gg :4 s.`P ti 3 Is a•, S+,,m. 3 ,. Dly .�.i \ I•914 �' tr 4 aM w ra-,4" 9 . j� 1 Ix Ar 6 4 111Th 4 AV SE muo xix , `n c A u r •• •�� q j t�ItR rC .. iy•0..= % ^' -.��/ 12 -�, �__ 11n„ AV. _4----, -. --2- -_..i'44,t,•— •'S .,,;.'Sp AMI7RMF a� z 'ROhSOH• !S M .ry.l . fv , C y7 'at .!,-1* F n 4q{' N • `r+ m GS 4 i 171M11 r1 C i I�us1a n x 'm ^a 4� :,1 :,�.^�• - III II LSE Ili AY SE , I17� �y s[ MI Ar S[ Rii�.`• y •r„L C_ ` ,r:. IIx 14 I :$•V, I.]v �• --Q u u�t Arm min; AV s[ iC '�4'" , O '7 P .F „T 116 IQ q 17� _ 16 R o�:n a ryttry A o` i D JH : AV SE k °p llslx AY SC^ i' L� +n * 1P l��w LI[ �� �j 116.L St 4 AV I a, K� k '` r`.'• P '��a �'''� ^R I p 17603 ,�rSl" `a rvrx AV s[ • ;• p ISE1 u �4r o l '� ^1" � !R IQ ,► r _ P d ! I FOHDHDS, kl 11 TN IIBIN AY SE iu,xln ' m K'I 1.1c��I•¢,�"x Av iI ' �,f 'f•�.,'I!yf" - �' 11 3 4 >s Ar TM �E lsv�it .x rs si ,7 �o�` „F. `` ''` "� +, s �y ! �. tT >7 IrigI IITAY 0 ItlfT 120TN AY ra SE �..••• ,_.••� 5�// tN� '' �l 9tx AV s[ ^ ^ ��'Y� 4. 0`'7' _ ard` •''°._.._ - •�L Cs _ x. k_ P Itp. rx" -'> w `Cr `�--_-' Av f[ ilm�/u� jfilu 3� 1 nili A f!? s P y�fi,/a� .Y '•`afi 4r ?�! ' }rn ►i sr tlif. PISt. M Ar sdl1/4.eT_LI._u,>;�ti xl(r r•h ,.;1' r Y. ,-;•• ,,k-4- ,,,-k. /• 11'. •.1.3 .i u SECTION II OFF-SITE ANALYSIS OFF-SITE ANALYSIS • This section discusses the off-site drainage aspects of the project . For the sake of continuity, a discussion of the on-site drainage conditions is also included. In support of the discussion the following supporting documents are provided: USGS Quadrangle map showing the drainage basin above the point mile downstream. Downstream map developed from the City's 1" = 400' drainage system maps. A copy of the pipe inventory from the City's records. UPSTREAM: No off-site areas drain onto the subject site. On the east there is a ditch that intercepts the runoff and carries it to the north side of the site, where it turns . to the west and goes to a storm drain system in E Valley Road. The property to the south is at the same grade as the subject site. Finally, to the west the drainage system in E. Valley Rd. carries the runoff to the north. ON-SITE: The site slopes down gently to the west and drains both to E Valley Road and to the existing drainage ditch lying on the east and north sides of the site. No other conveyance systems exist on the site. In addition, no wetlands, depressions or other drainage features are present. DOWNSTREAM: The ditch described above carries the runoff from the site to E. Valley Rd. , where it enters the storm drain system in that street. From there it is carried in 30 inch diameter pipes to the north up to 23rd St. , where it empties into a drainage channel that runs west to Springbrook Creek. The point which is '4 mile downstream from the site is in E. Valley Rd. north of 27th St. , therefor, no site review was made beyond this point. (See the enclosed supporting documents. ) 1..4,/,_1] k. IV -.-•..T .i.' ' I•/ • , I' W •' . 1 Y'ro ITF� r� J " I ._�_._ '�'r'-N �-ice IL_......._.- .. ..x • ,_ I. './ w II (CI123 I‘J it _.III.IF1F _ .f•• WI. Il 1• r0i ` I • ill II:... L_ •* j • I •I _ �,, rir •,, XA A ....... ..41p,..1 II tl s : • • : [ I • I IIIA11 li :l• 1 111 111 • '� 3 ..1 .• •�I I I .A a \\ •,rl li t .:'�l` • • � , it -.----,-. I �,. u II. • .: • •:• 311T1 j I� _ • •=kh1/1.3.-•• -CV- I' • ir _ 11/ I n m {V II I l-- : f • , II I�n VD Y1�fC I •l• I..' art, :,-••••_.. •1� II �1 V' t o �• ' I J o I: r Lind v " ■ I C Mk. ., .'.."."!:...: • I rn . ,., ilk_...) g .,�-r_, • _:' -�. 1- I Valle F?d _ _ CN:r•-•-‹ -:••-•"-r. _ : .. •''.-----•-'/--....\_: ' - j ...' ) -----"7--,'-----:\/• r , • --RA ----=_4._... awl 4 1 C ............-......--• ..:? ("II('•'•• J/ � 11; eiii."- ------ . •ill' _.....„-,:-., ' I __14 A= .l;• \: •old` /.� " ...._...//,. .,..sc •_..---:::n .. \----..1 '• -----.. 7 . ... . ,:• : :: ......,„„... ....iii„„,,,,,.wi ,,, ....:„2- . ....., ,__ -—BOA• ' - _• •- ��1,1.s�-•-• — _ 5 _ y ' ,r.' -.- I-�•. rf••.-• .... „ • y•'�':.�`y/I: • •�1 .,�' � j:etif 7. t. • / / • 1' '. '� i , : I •..1• a .• • I • V I.rl _�' ����. r _ •. 1, , '-. .._______( .--2-7-.. ot, . _ • 1: "„ilidia,4,_. .6.,--.000-F .... . ,._..iri__ ,, ,• • • . . ..\.ri 0 r,,, I . ..33, 1 I:, '..•,::0( •e ....,so...•• •,, A . ... in, , •,•jigiwe ... _:::::;./:.: .:,...:.;11.!..!:,....:.•:. . z/-- • V-f\.S\ • - • N °- I /i • I ( ' : i ' 1.-,.-.•• .T.t--. ..,,,-:•!.:-; •7I:::) . .ti•••: ... 1,..1 .;=? !F..••, •••••:•;...:1•• .1.: `•-•-•••1‘ 4.....> 7. rill ' :.:1„... ! ail -- -• 017. ------- • • • • °�.A' :I: P� i _ . ,—`/ • • • . : `�: -^'• ' )II: ...� r 1 coII \ y("l� 11..�'\ 11 II / I I. P.,URFA,Itl• a wcr ru- r.wn+_cwirru PURPOSES. DESIGNERS ARE TO FIELD VERIFY THIS DraRMATION. • • -- - SEE SHEET 21 2 are( Si- t iI ,....%i• ee.-.r.._ t6723 1 1 A� tom`.` :6sz 1 V n • 26,2 C [4 Ad i I jai.r}36 — - -- - --- 1 J L t6f1H .D , j) 2653-1 • IA I 1 4 moo Dowrnsi-ream :4.13-11 1 '. i SC4-1 } `'7 SW • -.IL 27TH ST '- J • '�`j[ 4_3 ♦_S 4'1 2'SD��t a6Dr-� K34-34-5H .-1 .441 • : e6r+a � ‹ j . I I tin.-71� ------- .i - • ' s6rs-s — ! .. 26rH • t I I t6r4-! i i SW 29T1- ST I 2tr�-2 ur,-n --- -9 t•'.. _INAK4-6.0 ' ' - - - - •- 26 4-1 1 I 4*E-.4LP i i 26E1-0 2'�"% 7 2417_5 I Mt.f- -.�trr76 i r t I ------.? i ..c...)S (e V I i ears. J i.--r' SW If 30T 1 lcH ST , — > .%.7 L...1 _ _ i... .-. tbrt2 - ! i :� I i f j �y i - . 1 cii �j1 Pi II II 2�� IA] Z+I LJ ; �� H if 1' I I 1 I .1I i I 2616-5 -26,T4-7 I -I i ! I 1i 1 Z I I . I I 1 I 1 4 • i 1 t6rF2.. .2,,,_I j' , S.W..cf_+?I Ps.If,: 26.-334TH 1, ..., ST Q' Q _ La=h1 26Ei-7 I ; 1 i �t6i7i . . i . ., .....:w�.axW.r.:.....n.........,•:.,aer.•.w-'a nyreawui�W�m .. ., .,. . ... .. - DISCLAIMER The inventory Information for the store drainage system was compiled tram numerous sources and is the best information available at this time and should be used only for General guidance. The City of Renton is not SHEET 26 NH AND OUTLET PIPE INVENTORY responsible for errors or omissions when this is used for engineering purposes. Designers are to field verify this information. HYDRAULIC • GRATE GRATE PIPE PIPE NANNIHGS DNNSTRN. PLAN' • PIPE PIPE AREA PIPE CAPACITY RADIUS STRUCTURE INDEX I TYPE C8 ? ELEV. UPPER 1E LONER IE TYPE 0/M SEP. DIAN TYPE LENGTH N STRUC. FILE SLOPE(%) (FT"2) (CFS) (FT.) NH 26,E8-2 2-48 Y 19.55 10.57 10.02 C N 24 RCP 150 0.012 26,E8-3 LID 314 0.367 3.1416 14.88 0.5000 NH 26,E8-3 2-54 Y 19.27 10.02 9.48 C M 24 RCP 150 0.012 26,EB-4 LID 314 0.360 3.1416 14.74 0.5000 NH 26,E8-4 2-54 Y 18.06 9.04 8.55 C N ' 30 RCP 246 0.012 26,E7-1 4-3-503 0.199 4.9087 19.88 NH 26,F2-1 2-60 Y 15.9 4.37 4.76 L N 36 RCP 11 0.012 P-9 CHANNEL LID 314 0.951 7.0686 70.66 1 NH 260-1 2-60 Y 15.75 4.97 4.69 C H 36 ACP 332 0.012 26,F3-2 LID 314 0.084 7.0686 21.04 0.7500 NH 26,F3-2 2-60 Y 16.06 4.69 4.42 C N 36 RCP 218 0.012 26,F3-3 LID 314 0.124 7.0686 25.50 0.7500 NH 26,F3-3 2-60 Y 16.18 4.42 4.37 L M 36 RCP 285 0.012 26,f2-1 LID 314 0.018 7.0686 9.60 0.7500 NH 26,F4-1 2-54 Y 15.62 6.12 5.56 C N 30 RCP 154 0.012 26,F4-2 LID 314 0.364 4.9087 26.87 0.6250 NH 26,F4-2 2-72 Y 16.47 5.56 6.02 C N 30 RCP 148 0.012 26,F4-3 LID 314 0.311 4.9087 24.84 0.6250 11 NH 26,FI-3 2-54 Y 16.04 6.02 5.57 C N 30 RCP 290 0.012 . 26,F4-4 LID 314 0.155 4.9087 17.55 0.6250 AGJGcc t1� NH 26,F4-4 2.54 Y 15.21 5.57 5.29 C N 30 RCP 162 0.012 26,F4-5 LID 314 0.173 4.9087 18.52 0.6250 {-o s i'4G NH 26,F4.5 2-60 Y 14.34 4.64 4.97 C M 36 RCP 298 0.012 26,f3-1 LID 314 0.111 7.0686 24.11 0.7500 -as. NH 26,F5-1__1_18 Y 16.11 735�6..94 C N 74____RCP 131_,0-012 26,F5-9 11D_114 0.445 3.1416 16.40 Q,5090 -= 611______260-2__2 54_t 11,78.._6..94__ i.,16.__C 74 24_RCP 14L0.01.2_26.F5-3 LID_314 9 I55_3.1416 1,6T _ 0-5000 NH • 26,F5-3 2-60 Y 16.08 7.16 6.93 C N 21 RCP 192 0.612 26,F5-4 LID 314 ;. 0.120 3.1416 8.51 0.5000 NH 26,F5-3 2-60 Y 16.08 8.7 - C N ' 36 RCP 55 0.012 OUTFALL LID 31( 15.818 7.0686 288.15 0.7500 NH 260-4 2-54 Y 15.34 6.93 6.74 C N 24 RCP 133 . 0.012 26,15-5 LID 314 0.143 3.1416 9.29 0.5000 NH 26,F5-5 2-60 Y 15.73 6.74 6.12 C N 30 RCP 155. 0.012 26,f4-I LID 314 0.400 4.9087 28.18 0.6250 NH 26,16-4 2-48 Y 16.92 12.88 9.1 C N 15 RCP 115 0.012 26,F6-5 4-3-503 3.287 1.2272 12.72 0.3125 NH 26,F6-5 2-48 Y 16.26 9.1 7.57 C N 21 RCP 192 0.012 26,F6-6 LID 314 0.797 2.4053 15.36 0.4375 NH 26,16-6 2-48 Y 16.18 7.57 7.55 C • M 21 RCP 164 0.012 26,15-1 LID 314 0.012 2.4053 1.90 0.4375 NH 26,62-I 2 Y 179.62 174.64 157 C M 12 RCP 205 0.012 26,63-I 18-1-21 8.605 0.7854 11.35 0.2500 NH 26,63-1 2 Y 161.91 157 146.1 C N 12 RCP 125 0.012 26,63-2 18-1-21 8.720 0.7854 11.43 0.2500 NH 26,63-2 2 Y , 149.38 145.88 129.5 C N 12 RCP 202 0.012 26,63-3 18-1-21 8.109 0.7854 11.02 • NH 26,63-3 2 Y 135.1 129.5 125.84 C N 18 RCP 100 0.012 26,63-4 18-1-21 3.660 1.7671 21.83 C . NH 26,63-4 2 Y 130.94 125.84 118.7 C M 18 RCP 210 0.012 26,63-5 18-1-21 3.400 1.7671 21.04 0.3750 MH 26,64-2 2-48 Y 106.01 101.96 88.7 C N 24 RCP 510 0.012 26,64-3 18-1-21 2.600 3.1416 39.62 0.5000 A NH 26,64-3 2-48 Y 95.91 88.7 - C M 24 RCP 165 0.012 26,64-4 18-1-21 53.758 3.1416 180.17 0.5000 NH 26,64-1 2 Y - 90.22 86.5 C N 24 RCP 40 0.012 26,64-5 18-1-21 9.300 3.1416 74.94 0.5000 NH 26,64-7 2 Y 121.63 114.03 103.47 C Y 15 CC 83 ,0,012 26,64-2 4-1-253 12.723 1.2272 25.03 0.3125 NH 26,64-8 2 Y 138.8 127,94 115.93 C N IS CC 124 0.012 26,64-7 4-1-253 9.685 1.2272 21.84 0.3125 NH 26,65-4 2 Y - 90.55 87.01 C M. 18 RCP 165 0.012 26,86-1 18-1-21 2.145 1.7671 16.71 0.3750 NIl 26,68-5 2-48 Y 79.16 74.51 51.95 C N 12 OP 308 0.024 26,68-6 3-1-202 7.325 0.7854 5.24 0.2500 NH 26,68-6 2-48 Y 55.5 51.95 26 C N 12 CRP 201 0.024 OUTFALL .3-1-202 12.910 0.7854 6.95 0.2500 NH 26,113-2 2 Y 111.9E 140.63 132.62 C N 15 CC 100 0.012 26,114-15 4-1-253 8.010 1.2212 19.86 0.3125 NH 26,83-5 2 Y 214.31 208.73 . 203.12 C H 12 CC 194 0.012 26,113-6 4-1-251 2.892 0.7854 6.58 0.2500 NH 26,84-1 2 Y 202 196.42 156.15 C N 15 CC 307 0.012 26,114-2 4-1-251 13.117 1.2272 25.41 0.3125 NH 26,H4-IO 2 Y 140.19 131.74 130.6 C Y 12 CC 142 0.012 26,84-11 4-1-253 0.803 0.7854 3.47 .0.2500 NH 26,84-11 2 Y 135.31 130.4 116.28 C M 12 CC 112 0.012 26,64-7 4-1-253 12.607 0.7854 13.74 0.2500 NH 26,84.15 2 Y 142.52 132.62 128.3 C N 15 CC 63 0.012 26,64-8 4-1-253 6.857 1.2272 18.37 0.3125 NH 26,114-3 2 Y 205.72 200.14 196.42 C H 12 CC 147 0.012 26,84-1 4-1-251 2.531 0.7854 6.16 0.2500 NH 26,H4.4 2 Y 217.73 212.15 200.14 C N 12 CC 286 0.012 26,114-3 4-1-251 4.199 0.7854 7.93 0.2500 NH 26,85-10 2 Y 167.89 156,99 156.33 C N 24 CNP 125 0.024 26,65-4 4-1-253 0,528 3.1416 8.93 0.5000 nil 76,H5.7 1 Y 159.76 155.1 146.119 S H 17 IMP 161 n 1174 9A 05-1 4-I-751 5 040 n TAU r 17 n +cnn SECTION III RETENTION/DETENTION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN . . -. . . . , . . c .""V Ch')SO I-1 '7.1 7 r 0 S S. 1 `5-1-i4c1-).5' . _. .. (4-7)44 ji.ay,rt-21 -1,..el cap —er r t (9 9 - N-2 ) -7-17,...5 ) .0 =,- (-DV_S" 1 )cc)) ' C)) -=-. dtl c5'6-."-• N D ) - -ti-S% £ 'I - C-2 tig-si )(L'61) .-1% Zy C ,rn Obi A J'a .I'VX11 illia 013 -14 . ... _ ....... - ..i. y 5 ra•06j-a Na0 i i.4 04 „poi ck2. --14 al -Y1( „,1 -,-),) S ro`1 911, -7.. a 5 '9,10rY1 -A osi.-yory) ,1 ,I-1-,1--, 6 —2.. _2. —f-Z.c9 ci --t. CI-7.- ---- • g- 1-liv,p )) ni.-Net?-,D&I . ... . i NV +-NAB..-v‘A j ors '')tii ,lei 1 • . ._ . . - - Ii 1/M41/11rN1 -. . , '"?•41/1-). S.Vd $•>2 i-P". "'Alri 557' VI Pill sifi-Ni 00 Tao+d 0) ?.,,,,,c4 _. • 7,04 s...p.rif .1_4,../..",cut.c. __IA 0). -..? ...41,1. • .. _ ,...4 . Ni ..,a I---) I 0) 14C)J"rA at C') . 0 AI ti . %a 1 • ,•<D,i.:4, N. ip l II I1 1 11 f .. ft-l� l 4,.j j � _ R Mil. _ : t4 r ICI" . .. ____5-0 i 1 ` 1f f • F- I I It . % • .; iz 41 . i il 1 .4'. Id* I �; y a S l rL. pU tJ O Ft'- Ire Qtti loal"C I• t It I 3Oo CV '`• _ L Y , ...,,.., s Ltb 1(cw [ou t,�ro-r�d i 0 1 ty y bsL F a off ( a a VI 4' v '• . . . . * -1)* . y • Oege(oped 6({-e :Y ' 0v-c..haje r yj cJvt • li 4 Id ']OLF 5vr zte. 12'vu0CC Q t.S`7�v +____J._ !h \ . 1 . ft it. Ilt 2 0. s°lo ,Ill 15. a " 0 172.L1= Swo�e �' t' r lil4CO 0.s•% . 1 1 .E 1 E 1 I r . i a 1 E V 10 w * ♦ I E E 11 AE T :. * •'' ' as - h... 6y 5/ 7/96 mite Development Services page 1 Autotrim BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: Al NAME: 2 Year Predeveloped SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1.50 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION - 2 .00 inches AREA. . : 1.50 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 .00 min CN • 85 .00 TIME OF CONC 52 .85 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 0 .00 Acres CN • 98 .00 TcReach - Sheet L: 300.00 ns:0 .1500 p2yr: 2 .00 s:0 .0056 TcReach - Shallow L: 80 .00 ks:11.00 s:0 .0056 TcReach - Channel L: 65 .00 kc:20.00 s:0 . 0012- PEAK RATE: 0 .12 cfs VOL: 0 .10 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min BASIN ID: a2 NAME: 10 Year Predeveloped SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1.50 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION 2 .90 inches AREA. . : . 1.50 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 .00 min CN • 85 .00 TIME OF CONC - 52 .85 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 0 .00 Acres CN 98 .00 TcReach - Sheet L: 300 .00 ns:0 .1500 p2yr: 2 .00 s :0 .0056 TcReach - Shallow L: 80 .00 ks:11.00 s:0 . 0056 TcReach - Channel L: 65 .00 kc:20.00 .s:0 .0012 PEAK RATE: 0 .28 cfs VOL: 0 .19 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min BASIN ID: cl NAME: 2 Year Postdevelopeci SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA - 1.50 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 .00 inches AREA. . : 0 .15 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 .00 min CN • 86 .00 • TIME OF CONC - 6.30 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 1.35 Acres CN 98 .00 PEAK RATE: 0 .57 cfs VOL: 0 .21 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min 5/ 7/96 Site Development Services page 2 Autotrim BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: c2 NAME: 10 Year Postdeveloped SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1.50 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 .90 inches AREA. . : 0 .15 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 .00 min CN • 86 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 6 .30 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 1.35 Acres CN • 98 . 00 PEAK RATE: 0 .86 cfs VOL: 0.32 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min 5/ 7/96 Site Development Services page 3 Autotrim HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY PEAK TIME VOLUME HYD RUNOFF OF OF Contrib NUM RATE PEAK HYDRO Area cfs min. cf-AcFt Acres 1 0 .124 490 4329 cf 1.50. 2 0 .277 490 8193 cf 1.50 3 0 .570 480 9158 cf 1.50 4 0 .858 480 13937 cf 1.50 5/ 7/96 Site Development Services page 4 Autotrim STAGE STORAGE TABLE UNDERGROUND PIPE ID No. detl Description: Detention Pipe Diameter: 4 .00 ft. Length: 310 .00 ft. Slope. . . : 0 .0000 ft/ft STAGS <----STORAGE----> STAGS <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Pt- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- 100.00 0.0000 0.0000 101.10 870.70 0.0200 102.20 2195 0.0504 103.30 3438 0.0789 100.10 25.944 0.0006 101.20 982.87 0.0226 102.30 2318 0.0532 103.40 3529 0.0810 100.20 72.820 0.0017 101.30 1098 0.0252 102.40 2440 0.0560 103.50 3615 0.0830 100.30 132.74 0.0030 101.40 1215 0.0279 102.50 2561 0.0588 103.60 3693 0.0848 100.40 202.74 0.0047 101.50 1334 0.0306 102.60 2680 0.0615 103.70 3763 0.0864 100.50 281.06 0.0065 101.60 1455 0.0334 102.70 2798 0.0642 103.80 3823 0.0878 100.60 366.41 0.0084 101.70 1577 0.0362 102.80 2913 0.0669 103.90 3870 0.0888 100.70 457.86 0.0105 101.80 1700 0.0390 102.90 3025 0.0694 104.00 3896 0.0894 100.80 554.64 0.0127 101.90 1824 0.0419 103.00 3134 0.0719 104.00 3896 0.0894 100.90 656.08 0.0151 102.00 1948 0.0447 103.10 3239 0.0744 101.00 761.56 0.0175 102.10 2071 0.0476 103.20 3341 0.0767 G 5/ 7/96 Site Development Services page 5 Autotrim STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. rstrl Description: Flow Restrictor Outlet Elev: 100 .00 Elev: 98 .00 ft Orifice Diameter: 1 .6816 in. Elev: 102 .70 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 2 .0801 in. STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---c£s 100.00 0.0000 101.30 0.0875 102.60 0.1237 103.90 0.2802 100.10 0.0243 101.40 0.0908 102.70 0.1261 104.00 0.2874 100.20 0.0343 101.50 0.0940 102.80 0.1655 104.10 0.2943 100.30 0.0420 101.60 0.0971 102.90 0.1832 104.20 0.3011 100.40 0.0485 _ 101.70 0.1001 103.00 0.1972 104.30 0.3077 100.50 0.0543 101.80 0.1030 103.10 0.2094 104.40 0.3141 100.60 0.0594 101.90 0.1058 103.20 0.2203 104.50 0.3203 100.70 0.0642 102.00 0.1085 103.30 0.2304 104.60 0.3264 100.80 0.0686 102.10 0.1112 103.40 0.2397 104.70 0.3324 100.90 0.0728 102.20 0.1138 103.50 0.2486 104.80 0.3383 101.00 0.0767 102.30 0.1164 103.60 0.2570 104.90 0.3440 101.10 0.0805 102.40 0.1189 103.70 0.2650 105.00 0.3497 101.20 0.0841 102.50 0.1213 103.80 0.2727 a• 5/ 7/96 Site Development Services page 6 Autotrim LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- <-PEAK-> STORAGE DESCRIPTION > (cfs) (cfs) --id- --id- <-STAGE> id VOL (cf) • 2 Year Design 0.12 0.57 detl rstr1 102.60 11 2682.15 10 Year Design 0.28 0.86 detl rstrl 103.86 12 311.49...41-1-70. L 40I3S41 $ 1, 3 6 00-3 cu. Ct - . - - . , . , ......___ ..._ ---) .:-1...i.cv,al _k-a...t.4 0-1 5 -.A 0-js ) L 0-17 _-:.--y-t to.1 fr, -•-"Pii 0 p) . gib ... . . . i I CC NQ = li CI-P'P .( °A)---2- =• a 66)g _S 0 - % AA r i P1 CA jj. -.1 iN.2., -A C"-j• 0.),),S- 0 • i.--.4 9 9 '0 --.-. Q0761 5-3.-: , 2.1 ,-w, — 4 C, .... .. . . _ . St j -t),ST1 • • . -7).*D-2 5-11 041N-1,'4 d •-e-1—)- -At. -71 - -N-11/DS -77.--Thi. s 7) i J_ . ( ,? ::: -)N1? ) "..t/ -Si'6) --, , ....-)sz a .0 • - •--- ' - - - - ' . - -s,‘ i rn p-m-1.-ni r,-7 •-, - g-i - -- --- - - I • t s.t...j tryi ft A -.17-0.ji-r7 r 1-40/".7r? --01.4. ' a rY - pi -A4)5(1 , -21 cla) _ _ . _ —.0-0.......4.4 -7-y L C '0 - 'tis'l -z: fghr -'--i- '71 • . - - - ---al "0-01 so il - -0 so q--ria $•‘) -IV re)5 . °1 ) °I)) :' % 21 two - , • - .. . . . 4? 01-21 (8 a rz --)3-A-bf: '. .• 1 . 11.9, ....hvir%.-'0 01-2.1\ 01 • .• • . ..• - • --- -- — - .i -6-n-a-.A tif- —I", • " ••••••• . 5/25/96 Site Development Services page 1 Autotrim Biofiltration Basins BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: biol NAME: 2 Year Biofiltration Flow SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1 . 13 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 .00 inches AREA. . : 0 .15 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 .00 min CN • 86. 00 TIME OF CONC • 6 .30 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 0 .98 Acres CN • 98 .00 PEAK RATE: 0 .42 cfs VOL: 0 .16 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: bio2 NAME: 25 Year Biofiltration Flow SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1.13 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 3 .40 inches AREA. . : 0 .15 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 .00 min CN 86.00 TIME OF CONC • 6 .30 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 0 .98 Acres CN 98 .00 PEAK RATE: 0 .76 cfs VOL: 0.28 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: bio3 NAME: 100 Year Biofiltration Flow SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1.13 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 3 .90 inches AREA. . : 0 .15 Acres TIME INTERVAL - 10 . 00 min CN 86 .00 TIME OF CONC • 6 .30 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 0 .98 Acres CN 98 .00 PEAK RATE: :0 .88 •cfs VOL: 0 .33 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min Trapezoidal Channel Analysis & Design Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name: Autotrim Comment: 2 Year Biofiltration Design Solve For Bottom Width Given Input Data: Left Side Slope 3 .00 :1 (H:V) Right Side Slope 3 .00 :1 (H:V) Manning' s n 0 .350 Channel Slope 0. 0200 ft/ft Depth 0.33 ft Discharge 0.42 cfs Computed Results: Bottom Width. . . . 4 .07 ft -t Velocity 0.25 fps Flow Area 1.67 sf Flow Top Width 6.05 ft -4 Wetted Perimeter. 6.16 ft Critical Depth. . . 0.07 ft Critical Slope. . . 4.4743 ft/ft Froude Number. . . . 0 .08 (flow is. Subcritical) • • Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3 .41 (c) 1991 Haestad Methods, Inc. * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 sji 5 Z Is —CZ?, —i , ) ."ar.2 Q•S'"2-‘ -71,1-.5") •0 -1 (a b'07'fi.91) '63 ZL ' 2. co9 ‘0) -J7127 __ szs . . 0 e p co 2) ,51 r, r • • -• I I _ . 51. S 7, .C.->p ai-ocy) --•^11 0 Jri . - • .. • • -s9 = . _ .9 ;_ • - r.:10,1rowl s-- - • •j-0-11,oci cS • .2 - • - ltd°CI n . 0 • . _ \)11211114 7-11r,lrn N'n0-1-3 on tt• ats-v-rvirnaH CA.3.s() do-). Q. • 94-• rl _A • g e 8 aoiz ) 9 1"61 • I 0 I2 1 -7-7, CO s —`""ir'A ( 41.-11 cry 5 ji 00; s‘-‘ art,/ ' • 7 Trapezoidal Channel Analysis & Design Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name: Autotrim Comment: Bioswale - Adiusted Length Solve For Depth Given Input Data: rf -Bottom Width 7.40 ft • < Left Side Slope. . 3 .00 :1 (H:V) Right Side Slope. 3 .00 :1 (H:V) Manning' s n 0 .350 Channel Slope 0.0200 ft/ft Discharge 0.42 cfs Computed Results: Depth 0.24 ft < 3 3 ' D k,Qy Velocity 0.22 fps Flow Area 1.94 sf < L S C s o (cct Flow Top Width. . . 8 .83 ft Wetted Perimeter. 8.91 ft Critical Depth. . . 0.05 ft Critical Slope. . . 5.0240 ft/ft Froude Number. . . . 0.08 (flow is Subcritical) Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3 .41 (c) 1991 Haestad Methods, Inc. * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 It°1?ci ,63 19z -0 iv vaviviaoi (y) _ oil 1 _z eljj Pq S C 0 AO _. —70 NO• •7-% 4)3 .„1 o , Ats-s-en en o)--1 1 SA 11/r'2) 0.41 Avo • or) PI • Trapezoidal Channel Analysis & Design Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name: Autotrim Comment: Bioswale - 25 Year Storm Solve For Depth Given Input Data: Bottom Width 7.40 ft Left Side Slope 3 .00 :1 (H:V) Right Side Slope 3 .00 :1 (H:V) Manning' s n 0.035 Channel Slope 0. 0050 ft/ft Discharge 2 .50 cfs Computed Results : Depth 0 .26 ft --r Velocity 1.15 fps Flow Area 2.16 sf Flow Top Width 8.99 ft - Wetted Perimeter 9.07 ft Critical Depth 0 .15 ft Critical Slope 0 .0346 ft/ft Froude Number 0 .41 (flow is Subcritical) Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3 .41 (c) 1991 Haestad Methods, Inc. * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 A GEOTECH March 19, 1996 CONSULTANTS, INC_ JN 96081 13256 N.E.20th St.(Northup Way),Suite 16 Bellevue,WA 98005 (206)747-5618 FAX 747-8561 Benchmark Development Company 5020- 141 st Avenue Southeast Bellevue, Washington 98006 Attention: Mark Sandler Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Study Younker Property 30XX East Valley Highway Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Sandler We are pleased to present this geotechnical engineering report for the concrete tilt-up structure to be constructed on the Younker property located in Renton, Washington. The scope of our work consisted of exploring site surface and subsurface conditions and then developing this report to provide recommendations for general earthwork and design criteria for foundations and pavements. You authorized our work in your March 1, 1996 letter. The subsurface conditions of the proposed building site were explored with five test pits that encountered 9 to 10 feet of uncontrolled fill over 3 to 4 feet of soft peat and silt. Loose, alluvial sand is under the peat and silt. The existing fill is likely to settle under the new load imposed by the proposed building. Furthermore, the peat is highly compressible. To reduce the risk of unacceptable foundation settlement, we recommend completing a preload, which will induce settlement, before the proposed building is constructed on conventional footings. Some post- construction settlement will still occur. Alternatively, the building and floor slabs may be supported on piles. The attached report contains a discussion of the study and our recommendations. Please contact us, if there are any questions regarding this report or if we can be of further assistance during the design and construction phases of this project. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. • mesH. Stran , Jr. Geotechnical Engineer 0 HS:'cv Pa ECFJ ED MI 2 9 1996 -,1 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Younker Property 30XX East Valley Highway Renton, Washington This report presents the findings and recommendations of our geotechnical engineering study for the site of a proposed automobile showroom and service facility in Renton, Washington. The general location of the site is illustrated on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1. Development of the property is in the planning stage, and detailed plans were not made available to us. The site plan and floor plan provided to us show the proposed building location and building dimensions. No topographic information or cross sections are provided on the plans. We anticipate that the finish grade will be near, or at, the existing grade. We understand that the development will consist of a concrete tilt-up building that has a footprint of 18,000 square feet The second story will have 3,000 square feet of space. Paved parking and access roads will surround the building. SITE CONDITIONS Surface The Younker property covers approximately 1.8 acres between State Route 167 and East Valley Road. The nearly rectangular site has about 170 feet of frontage along East Valley Road, which is almost parallel to State Route 167 at this location. The average depth of the property is approximately 480 feet The ground surface is generally level. Fill has been-placed over the entire site. The adjacent property to the south is utilized as a parking area for tractor trailers. A trucking company with a service building and office is on the northern side of the site. Subsurface The subsurface conditions were explored by excavating five test pits at the approximate locations shown on the Site Exploration Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration program was based upon the proposed construction and required design criteria, the site topography and access, the subsurface conditions revealed during excavation, the scope of work outlined in our proposal, and the time and budget constraints. The test pits were excavated on March 4, 1996 with a rubber-tired backhoe. A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the excavation process, logged the test pits, and obtained representative samples of the soil encountered. "Grab" samples of selected subsurface soil were collected from the backhoe bucket. The Test Pit Logs are attached to this report as Plates 3 through 5. In all of our test pits, the upper 9 to 10 feet of soil encountered was fill consisting of very moist, loose, silty, fine-grained sand with gravel. The lower half of the fill generally contained a significant amount of concrete and wood debris and occasionally metal and plastic. Under the fill, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Benchmark Development Coc..r .ny JN 96081 March 19, 1996 Page 2 we found 3 to 4 feet of very moist, loose, fibrous peat and silt. The deepest soil revealed in our test pits consisted of loose to medium-dense, silty, fine-grained sand and silt with low plasticity to the maximum explored depth of 13.5 feet. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and laboratory tests. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types at the exploration locations. The actual transition between soil types may be gradual, and subsurface conditions can vary between exploration locations. The logs provide specific subsurface information only at the locations tested. The relative densities and moisture descriptions indicated on the test pit logs are interpretive descriptions based on the conditions observed during excavation. Hydrocarbon Testing of Existing Fill At your request, special scrutiny was exercised in examining the existing fill for petroleum hydrocarbons. Some of the fill encountered in our test pits exhibited a moderate sheen during field screening. We did not note any hydrocarbon odors in the fill. Three samples of the fill were submitted to the project laboratory to determine their hydrocarbon content. The analysis of two of the soil samples determined that they contained measurable quantities of oil. Further testing was completed on these two samples to quantify the concentration of oil-range hydrocarbons. A copy of the laboratory report is attached to this report, and the test results are summarized in the following table: Sample Hydrocarbon Range Concentration MTCA Method A Clean Up Level TP2- 5 feet oil 620 ppm 200 ppm TP3-4.5 feet ND ND — 200 ppm TP4-6 feet oil 390 ppm 200 ppm Notes: ppm denotes parts per million. ND indicates none detected. Detection limits are 20 ppm for gasoline-range hydrocarbons, 50 ppm for diesel-range hydrocarbons, and 100 ppm for oil-range hydrocarbons. Groundwater Groundwater seepage was observed at a depth of 1 to 9 feet. The test pits were left open for only a short time period. Therefore, the seepage levels on the logs represent the location of transient water seepage and may not indicate the static groundwater level. It should be noted that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors. We anticipate that groundwater could be found within the native peat under the fill. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Benchmark Development Co. =tny JN 96081 March 19, 1996 Page 3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Our exploration of the project site revealed several feet of peat underlying 9 to 10 feet of fill. Since the peat is highly compressible, there is a potential for considerable settlement if the building foundation is constructed in a conventional manner. The foundation alternatives are (1) to install a deep foundation system or(2) to support the building on conventional footings after the site has been preloaded with a surcharge fill. The preloading option means more risk of foundation settlement and a greater chance of construction delays. If a deep foundation system is desired, we recommend drilling a minimum of two borings on the site to determine design parameters for a drilled pier foundation. For cost comparison purposes, we anticipate that each foundation pier would be on the order of 30 to 40 feet long with a capacity of about 30 tons. Due to the relatively large pieces of concrete rubble we encountered in the fill, significant pier installation difficulties could occur during pier installation and increase costs. We recommend preloading the building site with at least 7 feet of fill above the finish floor grade. Although 5 feet of preload fill is typically used in the Kent Valley for this type of building, soil conditions on the subject site are less suitable than usual and significant preload settlement may occur. The additional 2 feet of fill is therefore recommended. The top of the preload fill should extend at least 5 feet beyond the building perimeter. The settlement of the preload should be monitored to determine the length of time the preload should remain in place and the amount of settlement incurred. We estimate that the fill will need to be in place 90 to 120 days. Preload material may consist of any soil with a unit density of at least 130 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). We anticipate that 3 inches of ultimate post-construction settlement may occur over the lifetime of the building under normal loading conditions. The fill encountered in the test pits is uncompacted soil that contains wood and construction debris. For this reason, we recommend overexcavating all footings at least 4 feet and restoring the footing grade with compacted, structural fill. If significant organic material or construction debris is encountered during excavation, it should be removed. If the peat layer is encountered during the overexcavation, filter fabric should be laid over the peat prior to placing structural fill. Structural fill should consist of a well-graded, clean, pit-run material. Due to the poor strength and variability of the near-surface fill, we recommend placing a minimum of 1 foot of imported, gravelly sand structural fill under pavement sections to provide some resistance to cracking due to settlement. Soft or unstable pavement subgrade areas encountered during construction will require additional overexcavation. The on-site soil contains a significant amount of silt that is sensitive to moisture. Therefore, we recommend that the earthwork be performed during the dry summer months so the fill does not become softened by machinery and vehicle traffic. It would become necessary to import additional granular fill if the soil is softened. Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design. Such a plan review would be additional work beyond the current scope of work for this study, and it may include revisions to our recommendations to accommodate site, development, and geotechnical constraints that become more evident during the review process. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Benchmark Development Con - iy JN 96081 March 19, 1996 Page 4 Preloading Program Before placing the surcharge fill, the building area should be graded to the design finish grade. Then, a surcharge fill should be placed to induce as much settlement as possible prior to building construction. The surcharge fill does not have to meet any specific requirements, except it should. have a minimum in-place density of 130 pounds per cubic foot(pcf). However, if the surcharge fill is to be used later as fill on another part of the site, we recommend that it meet the requirements for structural fill, i.e. contain no organics and be compatible. Structural fill to be placed in wet weather should contain no more than 5 percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve. The side slopes of the surcharge fill should be inclined no steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical), and the top of the surcharge should extend at least 5 feet beyond the building perimeter. No fill berms for landscaping purposes should be placed near the building, since the addition of any fill could induce further settlement. Prior to placing the preload, at least six settlement markers should be installed in the area to be preloaded. Care should be taken to protect these markers from disturbance by construction equipment. The markers should be surveyed by a licensed surveyor during the fill and surcharge placement and then at intervals of two, four, eight, 16, 32, and so forth days after the completion of the fill. Initial readings should show the existing ground elevation, and the readings taken during the placement of the surcharge should show the surcharge fill thickness. Settlement readings should be furnished to, and evaluated by, Geotech Consultants, Inc. When the primary settlement is completed, the surcharge fill may be removed. The exposed subgrade should be proof-rolled, and any loose areas should be overexcavated and replaced by structural fill. Conventional Foundations Following the completion of the preloading program, the proposed structure can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on at least 4 feet of structural fill. We recommend 4 feet of structural fill beneath all footings, because of the quality of the underlying uncontrolled fill. See the later sub-section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill for recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill beneath structures. Exterior footings should be continuous even across doorways. We recommend that continuous and individual spread footings have minimum widths of 16 and 24 inches, respectively. They should be bottomed at least 12 inches below the lowest adjacent finish ground surface for frost protection. The local building codes should be reviewed to determine if different footing widths or embedment depths are required. Overexcavation will be required in footing areas. Elsewhere, overexcavation may be necessary if substantial unsuitable debris is found in the existing fill. An overexcavation must be at least as wide at the bottom as the sum of the depth of the overexcavation and the footing width. For example, an overexcavation extending 4 feet below the bottom of a 2-foot-wide footing must be at least 6 feet wide at its base. An allowable bearing pressure of 1,500 pounds per square foot is appropriate for footings constructed according to the above recommendations. A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Benchmark Development Coy;,zany JN 96081 March 19, 1996 Page 5 criteria, it is anticipated that the total post-construction settlement of footings founded on at least 4 feet of structural will be about 3 inches, with differential settlements on the order of 2 inches in a distance of 100 feet along a continuous footing. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundation and the bearing soil, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundation. For the latter condition, the foundation must be either poured directly against relatively level, undisturbed soil or surrounded by level, structural fill. We recommend using the following design values for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: Parameter Design Value Coefficient of Friction 0.40 Passive Earth Pressure 350 pcf Where: 1. pcf is pounds per cubic foot. . 2. Passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading, when using the above design values. Seismic Considerations The site is located within Seismic Zone 3, as illustrated on Figure No. 23-2 of the 1991 Uniform Building Code (UBC). In accordance with Table 23-J of the 1991 UBC, the site soil profile is best represented by Profile Type S4. The loose, saturated, alluvial sand and silty sand soil that is under the subject site to a great depth has a moderately high potential for liquefaction during a large earthquake. If this sandy soil does liquefy during a seismic event, substantial settlements, total and differential, could result. As a prediction of what soil will liquefy is difficult to make, the quantity of the settlement is all the more unpredictable to any degree of usable accuracy. The structural fill to be placed beneath the footings and the layer of non-structural fill that we encountered in our test pits will reduce the probability of a total loss of bearing due to liquefaction, but these soil layers will not prevent the differential and total settlements.- Applying a preload to the building area will do little toward preventing liquefaction. To greatly reduce the probability of liquefaction damaging the proposed structure, the structure needs to be supported on a deep foundation system that extends building loads down to the denser soil that is under the site. The depth to this denser soil is unknown on the subject site, but based on other projects in the Kent Valley, we estimate that this soil may be found 30 to 40 feet below the site grade. Typically, a deep foundation system is too expensive for an industrial building, and few owners have elected to install piling beneath low-density commercial and industrial buildings to mitigate liquefaction potential. Thus, foundation design for industrial GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Benchmark Development Cor :r..:Iy JN 96081 March 19, 1996 Page 6 buildings in the Kent Valley has evolved into a standard practice of placing footings on a pad of compacted, structural fill and using a relatively low allowable bearing capacity for the footings. The recommendations presented in this geotechnical report conform to this standard of practice. Slabs-on-Grade The building floors may be constructed as slabs-on-grade atop at least 1 foot of structural placed over the existing fill. The subgrade soil must be in a firm, non-yielding condition at the time of slab construction or underslab fill placement. Any soft areas encountered should be excavated and replaced with select, imported, structural fill. All slabs-on-grade should be underlain by a capillary break or drainage layer consisting of a minimum 4-inch thickness of coarse, free-draining, structural fill with a gradation similar to that discussed later in Permanent Foundation and Retaining Walls. In areas where the passage of moisture through the slab is undesirable, a vapor barrier, such as a 6-mil plastic membrane, should be placed beneath the slab. Additionally, sand should be used in the fine-grading process to reduce damage to the vapor barrier, to provide uniform support under the slab, and to reduce shrinkage cracking by improving the concrete curing process. We recommend placing concrete slabs over at least 1 foot of structural fill to provide more uniform support for the slab where the subgrade is soft or settles more rapidly than the surrounding ground. Isolation joints should be provided where the slabs intersect columns and walls. Control and expansion joints should also be used to control cracking from expansion and contraction. Saw cuts or preformed strip joints used to control shrinkage cracking should extend through the upper one-fourth of the slab. The spacing of control or expansion joints depends on the slab shape and the amount of steel placed in it. Reducing the water-to-cement ratio of the concrete and curing the concrete, by preventing the evaporation of free water until cement hydration occurs, will also reduce shrinkage cracking. The slab should be reinforced with a minimum of No. 4 rebar(or larger) placed 18 inches on center. We recommend proof-rolling the slab areas with a heavy truck or a large piece of construction equipment prior to slab construction. Any soft areas encountered during proof-rolling should be excavated and replaced with select, imported, structural fill. Permanent Foundation and Retaining Walls We anticipate that earth-retaining walls will not be necessary for this project. However, if retaining walls are required and they are backfilled on only one side, they should be designed to resist the lateral earth pressures imposed by the soil they retain. The following recommended design parameters are for walls that restrain level backfill: Parameter Design Value Active Earth Pressure* 35 pcf Passive Earth Pressure 350 pcf Coefficient of Friction 0.40 Soil Unit Weight 130 pcf GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. • Benchmark Development Cot.. ,;ny JN 96081 March 19, 1996 Page 7 Where: 1. pcf is pounds per cubic foot. 2. Active and passive earth pressures are computed using the equivalent fluid densities. • For restrained walls that cannot deflect at least 0.002 times their height, a uniform lateral pressure equal to 10 psf times the height of a wall should be added to the above active equivalent fluid pressure. The values given above are to be used to design permanent foundation and retaining walls only. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding, when using the above recommended values to design the walls. The design values given above do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads, such as vehicles, will be placed behind the walls. If these conditions exist, those pressures should be added to the above lateral soil pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, we will need to be given the wall dimensions and the slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of a wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. The compaction of backfill near the walls should be accomplished with hand-operated equipment to prevent the walls from being overloaded by the higher soil forces that occur during compaction. Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed behind retaining or foundation walls should be coarse, free-draining, structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than 5 percent silt or clay particles and have no gravel greater than 4 inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. If the existing fill soils are used as backfill, a drainage composite similar to Miradrain 6000 should be placed against the backfilled retaining walls. The drainage composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system. The purpose of these backfill requirements is to ensure that the design criteria for a retaining wall are not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The top 12 to 18 inches of the backfill should consist of a relatively impermeable soil or topsoil, or the surface should be paved. The sub-section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Benchmark Development Company JN 96081 March 19, 1996 Page 8 Excavations and Slopes No excavated slopes are anticipated other than for utility trenches. Excavation slopes should not exceed the limits specified in local, state, and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts to a depth of about 4 feet may be attempted vertically in unsaturated soil, if there are no indications of slope instability. Based upon Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296, Part N, the soil type at the subject site would be classified as Type B. Therefore, temporary cut slopes greater than 4 feet in height cannot be excavated at an inclination steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical), extending continuously between the top and the bottom of a cut. The above-recommended temporary slope inclination is based on what has been successful at other sites with similar soil conditions. Temporary cuts are those that will remain unsupported for a relatively short duration to allow for the construction of foundations, retaining walls, or utilities. Temporary cut slopes should be protected with plastic sheeting during wet weather. The cut slopes should also be backfilled or retained as soon as possible to reduce the potential for instability. Please note that loose soil can cave suddenly and without warning. Utility contractors should be made especially aware of this potential danger. Drainage Considerations We recommend the use of footing drains at the base of footings, where (1) crawl spaces or basements will be below a structure, (2) a slab is below the outside grade, or(3) the outside grade does not slope downward from a building. Drains should also be placed at the base of all backfilled, earth-retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least 6 inches of 1-inch- minus, washed rock and then wrapped in non-woven, geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At its highest point, a perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as the bottom of the footing, and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. A typical drain detail is attached to this report as Plate 6. For the best long-term performance, perforated PVC pipe is recommended for the footing drains. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Final site grading in areas adjacent to a building should slope away at least 2 percent, except where the area is paved. Pavement Areas All pavement sections may be supported on a minimum of 1 foot of imported, gravelly, sand structural fill, provided this fill can be compacted to a 95 percent density and is in a stable, non- yielding condition at the time of paving. Additional structural fill or fabric may be needed to stabilize soft, wet, or unstable areas. We recommend using Supac 5NP, manufactured by Phillips Petroleum Company, or a non-woven fabric with equivalent strength and permeability characteristics. In most instances where unstable subgrade conditions are encountered, an additional 12 inches of granular, structural fill will stabilize the subgrade, except for very soft areas where additional fill could be required. The subgrade should be evaluated by Geotech Consultants, Inc., after the site is stripped and cut to grade. Recommendations for the compaction GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Benchmark Development JN 96081 March 19, 1996 Page 9 of structural fill beneath pavements are given in a later sub-section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill. The performance of site pavements is directly related to the strength and stability of the underlying subgrade. The pavement for lightly loaded traffic and parking areas should consist of 2 inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over 4 inches of crushed rock base (CRB) or 3 inches of asphalt-treated base (ATB). We recommend providing heavily loaded areas with 3 inches of AC over 6 inches of CRB or 4 inches of ATB. Heavily loaded areas are typically main driveways, dumpster sites, or areas with truck traffic. The pavement section recommendations and guidelines presented in this report are based on our experience in the area and on what has been successful in similar situations. Some maintenance and repair of limited areas can be expected. To provide for a design without the need for any repair would be uneconomical. General Earthwork and Structural Fill All building and pavement areas should be stripped of surface vegetation, topsoil, organic soil, and other deleterious material. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill, but they could be used in non-structural areas, such as landscape beds. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under a building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soil needs to support loads. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at, or near, the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content that results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type selected, the compaction equipment used, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. The loose lift thickness should not exceed 12 inches. We recommend testing the fill as it is placed. If the fill is not compacted to specifications, it can be recompacted before another lift is placed. This eliminates the need to remove the fill to achieve the required compaction. The following table presents recommended relative compactions for structural fill: Minimum Location of Fill Placement Relative Compaction Beneath footings, slabs, 95% or walkways Behind retaining walls 90% Beneath pavements 95% for upper 12 inches of subgrade, 90% below that level GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Benchmark Development Company JN 96081 March 19, 1996 Page 10 Where: Minimum Relative Compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D 1557-78 (Modified Proctor). Use of On-Site Soil If grading activities take place during wet weather, or when the silty, on-site soil is wet, site preparation costs will be higher because of delays due to rain and the potential need to import additional granular fill. The on-site soil is generally silty and thus moisture-sensitive. Grading operations will be difficult during wet weather, or when the moisture content of this soil exceeds the optimum moisture content. Due to its silt and organic content, the existing fill is not suitable for use as structural fill, and it is considered moisture-sensitive. Moisture-sensitive soil is susceptible to excessive softening and "pumping" from construction equipment, or even foot traffic, when the moisture content is greater than the optimum moisture content. It may be beneficial to protect subgrades with a layer of imported sand or crushed rock to limit disturbance from traffic. Ideally, structural fill that will be placed in wet weather should consist of a coarse, granular soil with a silt or clay content of no more than 5 percent. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of soil passing the three-quarter-inch sieve. LIMITATIONS The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soil encountered in the test pits is representative of subsurface conditions on the site. If the subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those observed in our explorations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil samples in test pits. Subsurface conditions can also vary between exploration locations. Such unexpected conditions frequently require making additional expenditures to attain a properly constructed project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to accommodate such potential extra costs and risks. This is a standard recommendation for all projects. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Benchmark Development Company and its representatives for specific application to this project and site. Our recommendations and conclusions are based on observed site materials, and selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses. Our conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints. No warranty is expressed or implied. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, except GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Benchmark Development Coml,, JN 96081 March 19, 1996 Page 11 as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. We recommend including this report, in its entirety, in the project contract documents so the contractor may be aware of our findings. ADDITIONAL SERVICES In addition to reviewing the final plans, Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be retained to provide geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during construction. This is to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the intent of contract plans and specifications, and to provide recommendations for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. However, our work would not include the supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor and its employees or agents. Also,job and site safety, and dimensional measurements, will be the responsibility of the contractor. The scope of our work did not include an environmental assessment, but we can provide this service, if requested. The following items are attached and complete this report: Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Site Exploration Plan Plates 3-5 Test Pit Logs Plate 6 Footing Drain Detail Appendix Laboratory Report We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions, or if we may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTAN ames H. Strange, . Geotechnical Engineer . FLAT, 4) of WAS " 2. 'P 1SEE0 gy 4, ION AI.1i.' James R. Finley, Jr., P.E. Principal EXPIRES 8/ 17/ 97 JHS/JRF:jcv GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. iS' N f r,'� = N r ..:••L'NYMi r.:•�� � N fN +N. *33 ' > off- •:.t; \` '�,1 a• 3<� I 147TN IZST 10B :,.1';;':Y Gwei! ap HMI, ... I fI-`I 2A• giI.2 Nr � typo <�l1 .4 ,-,1 1: 4 711 10TN ST �J`I S RENTDH VILLAGE PL J IV r OLD'C ITN ST M- rl'S9TH , T 1� 'c:I V,PARX:... I r1 <> _ a n ST .n > as PARK ++.. a 1•PoWr4 ®0 < I m IT A d$TN .`f:G9 ~:�`��`;:,:::�.I\:Oa• f':'cr ERH i R� �T < st I tZif II u7 11 :7..'. . F• - NCRTN •j o < I '1j1rN Z �� i4.9 7N0 $T I-f S'flsrn Z ? \T-1. >• �' z ® O 1 H 1 Tw > `W�' Z31Cit. ;' tsru - I4T 1 t 1 . sT < 1 �l p s N •I �` \ w �: .B J a la . x—S 16TN ST s,- f 5 isTvL 1 — --opZ -157RDi . 's' -- ---;_24:T: W— d-i_ — -, o; — Ity — sB,I 1 = 7uKwll.A T �• � ice, c u: a 1 1 y<a N, .s tml s. r:.4, Up, ` PK :. �I (. LI - > • 7 G i IBM ST . yCFiy ar ra. : . I o ,: v' < * N G a 3_: TF o,N Ko'• ft/ I Lo es;: • _ ! N I ST i R 1■CN 1.,,,‘,.,,,..,,,,,,,,,,,, 1G 2p• tI :�� $W 19TN ST .,:s„.,..: ' N T < ¢ S�•�p +y�L T j� I .r Ie J o En I .1, I m S p� v o eu J♦'�♦J. -1=$I I Racelil •'.r. I 4P>�TN n ,p Cp7 D4 Nti"' ••♦ ••iJ0 NKWILA y T SIN 31sr Sr e1 <N O 1STr. •♦♦J.•••. PKWY I Ise N$ II ' •:ji I ; N SE . ♦•••Ji J. r m I I za I 2�D ? ,; J�.•.;.;.♦Oa .•,.;. EVAN- a mN1N Traci! "" 51. ,I�JJi iiii •�♦�1 a W r I flu /f •fl SW 23R0 ST .§__23R0 Sr rn JR 1-� t �.••••••♦•••�• l ••.�.AKER �.W m 1 ;o ,� S 6+ jaAJ i NS i•K•irW BN N•.♦. 1tu aB,C NTENwA r �1[�T/�•�� I• ..:.; RE I'tJ T 4► NI _g; ISZI I R I..E1 r_04- 4. I 5 78TN,5T-4 I 'i 26TN i .itl.,♦J J•-0Jii — a I II —————— —-L- — - 4• l 'j= ®--I-—1 a-SE-1R+r -.••°•°itrPsJ i c iw r f •♦ ■ i:i� q11 I I• D°'Ce . y im >W I. STRANDER BLVD W I may, W I SW 27T ST + 0 7 <'^ r A. \ fy� I 337;M' q 51 0 �cr+<i _ - �� o yF,y 1 C • !,P. } K 4. .5 t1r SE 5E Sr SS • N TQE. DR- z IND(/ < 1 2 I�' > I 3 5'� PL N 168TN SI o z rT 2 ::1MT $ s ptN sr sE ,6rrN; > < O,P Qr 22` I Z6 < s I SE` ENSN SW 715T I -: W I CT ® < 6 (f� 5' "<1 5 I I. I F. , III_ GREEHKELT 2I sr,33R0 LL - g SE 17874 ST C•R?•RATE > I < I EA. N I f5 I O R N I !Ill < I w \ r • W 31TN ST ® I I CORPORATE I. > < S I77N0 ST E 172NO Sq ---- DR-MINKLER BLVO o I ff II W A 5� I_ >—Ir I _ ' E.ZRD S _■[ommu i7V-i:PWID-0a — ——a� ——T—-- —�+'j -' =S 74Th 1.+IETLTrT" « Z •s IW-�ar,r sr I _ S I73TH ST I _ I EMERGENCY I 2y o N a ; f5 I CENTER I yl4' I w S 78TN I S I j 4' ` MIDLAND QP Grp I O SW¢6 TN T I T I JS w S� 176TN ST I La b 11=rr I < I Iu /• ul \"S f > Q0 , > I 1 SAKDNI;OR us I o SW ` at T ST VALLEYS 177TN ST 'r 5S I 9 P < I rRILANO�q I = , > I > I I IEOICAL O s,,,, Q j J S I4 ST 6 op I A a __. I I ■•C>u •�179TN ST IT Cf m = I I %•+• �'SQ DI I x SE 1791 PLC I 199TH I Y^_ r A; SW I• I RD I ST I PP N sE IdOM RSl60TF I ; I i.p ��v,181ST. ST S ......11180TH i ST 1�P I SE IBIS S.��-jII•q.pS I SEGAL r Pt8it .;'.:m R 7� •91= >< l. PIKERS ; I S<182ND *i ::n?' I I , O I 0 ___ I SE 8• NSE a pf� STL.L _ I —=I �_I_ +� S�Lt$TN — 1— .rr--_— �' ®aC —ay_——3r >I ti GAPEN3ft?7154, I dry I O .I I a• I630.D> I a u�T'�I`i L• 36 I ( may`` I 3I a 1 H 32 DT IW \` y`hi 00 }i yyo� I F I ,P j I ^-i SE 166TH .. ST =1i 1y ., or 7l ..E186TNUT_. I' I I EV I 1 W SE 137TH STJ N'sE 186TN rE +a 31Sr_uo1_`I �- •, 01 m I SE':In i >a, i DRC .c 5r QI I I 1 I187TI ST <Q - pl?T -^ Ix S 18819 ST at 4 S ,98TN sT a I S morn G S ZN ' I ,`.-eafsco : < mt I H I 4i r r oSSe P - .bIEANDER�: ..J y o N _. I = -J 188TN }. i ...:p.IRK;::.,... .. J 1 1 12 S7' L L1� esc r: >.:•. ST F' -'S 190TH ST �� $1 TM ST I I I0 J SE 190TN Z SE 190TH STN s 1s9rN u I �---^ j •� r j < SE 190114.§ Si N > SE 01.'N RI- i Is 19_1ND _STN r S Ig'ND $T ` r N y 1 _ /B B"8?J1 :�ND ST S 192ND 19 NO ST I I•-_ESE.y2Np LI ST —� KENT 4��$• ;; A_ :.e- ' I a=`a 5 139TH Sr S\ I S 194TN ST ,�7d••0 SE 1194TH�T I- V t:� ? m 5.,94ZH I I `-_ t I SE 19a14 V y S I13 t96TH IA ST J VI .• I �I r9I�Tl£, O I / F =1R 01 1'.TN §T N -i L 52— Ir 0STY it y¢o W �j< 1 < 9 > • r�TN<ST Cry S yI S 198TH rT /.� a 2 3 , sw TH ST a 11---I . s,ys7 A,IP, I r a ~61 g \••J 5 l/I BONG AEROSPACE CENTER 'I Q! I^I I^ Il. s s, 200TH <ST I SE 199*N i" — I >I I I S 2COTH ST '• r, al !3 -E, = 1SE 200TH ST j I„• 1 I <, 1; I SIN yLl x! c I e-I of: LB, ER -F�•--I_L:1 .= SE 2015T Sr SIV, IC VINITY MAP =„410 GEOTECH 30XX EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY CONSULTANTS R ENTO N, WA 56 Job No.: Dole: Lopped ay: Moto: 96081 MAR 1996 1 EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY ® _ TP-5 a TP-4 0 1 i ' I � TP-3 a TP-1 0 PROPOSED BUILDING TP-2 LEGEND q APPROXIMATE TEST PIT LOCATIONS SITE EXPLORATION PLAN GEOTECH 30XX EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY CONSULTANTS RENTON, WA ✓ob No.: Dole: P/ole: 98081 MAR 1996 2 • TEST PIT 1 T e • G°� USCS Description _ Brown, silty SAND with gravel,very moist to wet,loose X -becomes dark gray with bricks,concrete,glass,plastic,and metal debris, j 5 — FILL loose to medium-dense -2-to 3-foot concrete slab debris - r -logs and concrete encountered 10 — i ]✓nBrown, fibrous PEAT, moist,loose ,j V�J✓� • I 'tit Tan,low plasticity SILT with peat, wet,loose sM _` Gray low plasticity SILT and black SAND,wet,loose 15_ Test pit terminated at 13 feet below grade on 3-5-96. Slight groundwater seepage was encountered at 1 foot and 8 feet during excavation. Slight caving. • TEST PIT 2 Th •4, c 4*cf USCS Description 0 Brown, silty,fine-grained SAND with organics,moist to very moist, loose — M=19.5% FILL r ' 5 — Dark gray to black, silty SAND with occasional gravel,bricks,wood, grass, _ FILL concrete,and organic debris,very moist,loose _ -2-to 3-foot concrete slab debris • 10 — II I I I Brown, fibrous PEAT with tan silt,very moist,loose M=33.4% .: SM :; Gray, silty, fine-grained SAND,wet,medium-dense 15_ Test pit terminated at 13 feet below grade on 3-5-96. Slight groundwater seepage was'encountered at 4.5 feet and 9 feet during excavation. Slight caving. TEST PIT LOGS GEOTECH 30XX EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY CONSULTANTS, INC. RENTON, WA Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 96081 MAR 1996 %NS 3 TEST PIT 3 • q�4` `• °,y�3�� oc �, USCS Description 0 Brown,very silty SAND with gravel and abundant organics,very moist, FILL loose • -2-to 4-foot pieces of concrete debris Dark gray, silty SAND with gravel,concrete,and wood debris, moist, 5 — medium-dense FILL -contains less debris,becomes very moist and loose 10 — FILL Gray,low plasticity SILT with reeds,wet,loose 0 Brown,fibrous PEAT, moist,loose • l® I Tan,low plasticity SILT with organics,very moist, loose Brown,fibrous PEAT, moist,loose I`• sM ✓ Gray,very silty, fine-grained SAND,wet, loose to medium-dense 15 Test pit terminated at 13.5 feet below grade on 3-5-96. No groundwater seepage was encountered during excavation. • • No caving. � � TEST PIT 4 any � USCS Description 0 _ Brown,silty SAND with gravel,moist,loose '.� FILL -becomes mixed with organics _ FILL Blue-gray,gravelly,silty SAND,moist, medium-dense to dense 5 — Black, silty SAND and SILT with concrete, metal, wood, FILL and plastic debris,moist, medium-dense -encountered concrete slab 10— • Test pit terminated on concrete slab at 9 feet below grade on 3-5-96. Slight groundwater seepage was encountered at 2 feet during excavation. No caving. 15 TEST PIT LOGS GEOTECH 30XX EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY CONSULTANTS, INC. RENTON, WA Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 96081 MAR 1996 JHS 4 TEST PIT 5 ei4 •°'y��'C~ 4c USCS Description 0 — M=20.570x Black,very silty SAND with organics,very moist to wet, loose FILL Gray, silty SAND with gravel,cobbles,concrete,and wood debris, 5 — moist,loose to medium-dense FILL -becomes wet,loose I : Brown,fibrous PEAT,very moist,loose 10 _ :1vrl i✓v v ML Tan,low plasticity SILT and PEAT,very moist,loose Gray,silty,fine-grained SAND,wet,medium-dense 15_ Test pit terminated at 13 feet below grade on 3-5-96. Slight groundwater seepage was encountered at 1.5 feet during excavation. Moderate groundwater seepage was encountered at 8 feet during excavation. Caving from 7 to 8 feet. • • • • • TEST PIT LOGS ' �._ GEOTECH 30XX EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY CONSULTANTS, INC. RENTON, WA Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 96081 MAR 1996 JHS 5 • • Slope backfill away from foundation. . \ T/GHTL/NE ROOF DRA/N Do not connect to footing drain. BACKF/LL See text for 1 / VAPOR BARR/ER requirements. SLAB WASHED ROCK •o.°.'..o.A: ;•^ ��Y ^ �� �� 4��m/n. t • FREE-DRAIN/N G NONWOVEN GEOTEXT/LE SAND/GRAVEL FILTER FABR/C 4"PERFORATED HARD PVC PIPE Invert at least as /ow as footing and/or crawl space. S/ope to drain. Place weepholes downward. FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL GEOTECH 30.XX EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY CONSULTANTS RENTON, WA Job No.: Doles Seale: Role:6 96081 MAR 1996 N.T.S. APPENDIX Laboratory Report GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. • , From:Robert J.Wallace To: James Strange Date:3120/98 Time:09:40:31 Page 1 of 8 • March 18, 1996 James Strange GeoTech Consultants 13256 NE 20th Street,Suite 16 Bellevue,WA 98005 Re: Analytical Data for Project 96081. Laboratory Reference No. 9603-032 Dear James: Enclosed are the results of the analyses,and associated quality control data,of samples submitted on March 8, 1996. The standard policy of OnSite Environmental Inc., is to store your samples for 30 days from the date of receipt. If you require longer storage, please contact the laboratory. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions concerning the data,or need additional information, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, Karl P. Homyik Project Chemist Enclosures • From:Robert J.Wallace To: Janes Strange Date:3r20196 Time:09:41:13 Page 2 of 8 2 Date of Report: March 18, 1996 Samples Submitted: March 8, 1996 Lab Traveler.03-032 Project:96081 WTPH-HCID Date Extracted:3-11-96 Date Analyzed: 3-11-96 • Matrix:Soil Client ID Lab ID GC Characterization o-terphenyl Flags Surrogate Recovery 96081-TP2- 03-032-1 <20 ppm Gasoline range hydrocarbons 137% ES1-5' <50 ppm Diesel range hydrocarbons Oil range hydrocarbons 96081-TP3- 03-032-2 <20 ppm Gasoline range hydrocarbons 127% ES1-4.5' <50 ppm Diesel range hydrocarbons <100 ppm Oil range hydrocarbons 96081-TP4- 03-032-3 <20 ppm Gasoline range hydrocarbons 122% ES1-6 <50 ppm Diesel range hydrocarbons Oil range hydrocarbons . From:Robert J.Wallace Ta James Strange Date:3r2019& Time:09:41:49 Page 3 of 8 3 Date of Report: March 18, 1996 Samples Submitted: March 8, 1996 Lab Traveler.03-032 Project:96081 WTPH-HCID METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted:3-11-96 Date Analyzed:3-11-96 • Matrix:Soil Lab ID: MB0311S1 • GC Characterization o-terphenyl Flags Surrogate Recovery Method Blank <20 ppm Gasoline range hydrocarbons 113°! <50 ppm Diesel range hydrocarbons <100 ppm Oil range hydrocarbons . From:Robert J.Wallace To: James Strange Date:3120196 Time:09:4222 Page 4 of 8 4 Date of Report: March 18, 1996 Samples Submitted: March 8, 1996 Lab Traveler.03-032 Project:96081 WTPH 418.1 Date Extracted: 03-13-96 • Date Analyzed: 03-13-96 Matrix:Soil Units:mg/Kg(ppm) Client ID Lab ID Dilution Total Petroleum Flags PQL Factor Hydrocarbons 96081-TP2-ES1-5' 03-032-1 5.0 620 30 96081-TP4-ES1-6' 03-032-3 5.0 390 28 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 05/29/96 16 : 16 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9602630 Amount : 1, 500 . 00 05/29/96 16 :15 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #0013 YOUNKER Init : LN Project #: LUA96-066 Type : LUA Land Use Actions Location: 3000 BLOCK OF EAST VALLEY RD Total Fees : 1, 502 . 56 This Payment 1, 500 . 00 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 500 . 00 Balance: 2 . 56 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 • **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9602631 Amount : 2 . 56 05/29/96 16 :16 Payment Method: CASH Notation: YOUNKER LIMITED Init : LN Project # : LUA96-066 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Location: 3000 BLOCK OF EAST VALLEY RD Total Fees : 1, 502 .5.6 This Payment 2 . 56 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 502 . 56 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage 2 . 56