Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutzTIR-3962D E V E L O P M E N T E N G I N E E R I N G B r i a n n e B a n n w a r t h 0 2 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 8 S U R F A C E W A T E R U T I L I T Y r s t r a k a 0 2 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 8 F I N A L R - 3 9 6 2 C - 1 7 0 0 2 6 8 3 L U A - 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 3 P R - 1 7 0 0 0 0 5 7 D E V E L O P M E N T E N G I N E E R I N G A n n F o w l e r 0 2 / 2 2 / 2 0 1 8 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title 1 Project Overview 1-1 2 Conditions and Requirements Summary 2-1 3 Offsite Analysis 3-1 4 Flow Control/Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design 4-1 5 Conveyance System Analysis and Design 5-1 6 Special Reports and Studies 6-1 7 Other Permits 7-1 8 SWPPP Analysis and Design 8-1 9 Bond Quantities, Facility Summaries 9-1 10 Operations and Maintenance Manual 10-1 Technical Information Report 1-1 LDC Job No. 16-137 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW The Renton Special Care Community project proposes the construction of four cottages, three for resident housing and the fourth to act as the administration/ kitchen building. Approximately 50,000 SF of impervious surface and roughly 21,000 SF of pervious surface is proposed onsite and within the Right-of-Way frontage. The proposed development proposes four convalescent buildings, access drive aisles, parking, associated utilities and ROW improvements on a 1.65 acre site. The subject property is located on parcels 0087000285 and 0087000293 at 17033 108 th Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98055. Access to the proposed project will be gained from the south and east via SE 172nd St and 108th Ave SE respectively. The subject property is comprised of two parcels, one is currently developed with a vacant single-family residence, associated driveway and landscaped areas and the other parcel is undeveloped with moderate to dense vegetation. Site soils are dense to very dense Vashon Till, exhibiting low infiltration rates. Existing grades across the property are moderate across most the site, ranging from 2 to 25%, sloping mainly from the northeast to the southwest. Runoff from the site currently flows to the southwest and exits the subject property at the southwest corner of the site, entering the municipal storm drainage system located in SE 172nd ST. Downstream flows eventually outlet into the Black River, a tributary of the Duwamish River. A lot combination will be completed to combine the two parcels to one. Offsite frontage clearing activities will result in additional disturbed area impacts to the site. See Developed Hydrology Map, Figure 4.2 for a graphical depiction of the proposed development. This report and calculations were produced in accordance with the 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual and the 2017 City of Renton Surface Water Design Manual (2017 City of Renton SWDM). CITY OF RENTON SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL 2017 City of Renton Surface Water Design Manual 12/12/2016 8-A-1 REFERENCE 8-A TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PROJECT ENGINEER Part 2 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION Project Owner _____________________________ Phone ___________________________________ Address __________________________________ _________________________________________ Project Engineer ___________________________ Company _________________________________ Phone ___________________________________ Project Name __________________________ CED Permit # ________________________ Location Township ________________ Range __________________ Section _________________ Site Address __________________________ _____________________________________ Part 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION Part 4 OTHER REVIEWS AND PERMITS  Land Use (e.g., Subdivision / Short Subd.)  Building (e.g., M/F / Commercial / SFR)  Grading  Right-of-Way Use  Other _______________________  DFW HPA  COE 404  DOE Dam Safety  FEMA Floodplain  COE Wetlands  Other ________  Shoreline Management  Structural Rockery/Vault/_____  ESA Section 7 Part 5 PLAN AND REPORT INFORMATION Technical Information Report Site Improvement Plan (Engr. Plans) Type of Drainage Review (check one): Date (include revision dates): Date of Final:  Full  Targeted  Simplified  Large Project  Directed __________________ __________________ __________________ Plan Type (check one): Date (include revision dates): Date of Final:  Full  Modified  Simplified __________________ __________________ __________________ Renton Special Care Community LLC Renton Special Care Community 98040 C17002683 2731 77th AVE SE, Suite #203 Mercer Island, WA 29 Mark Villwock 5E LDC, Inc.29 425-806-1869 17033 108th AVE SE Renton, WA 98055 REFERENCE 8: PLAN REVIEW FORMS AND WORKSHEET TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET 12/12/2016 2017 City of Renton Surface Water Design Manual 8-A-2 Part 6 SWDM ADJUSTMENT APPROVALS Type (circle one): Standard / Blanket Description: (include conditions in TIR Section 2) ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ Approved Adjustment No. ______________________ Date of Approval: _______________________ Part 7 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Monitoring Required: Yes / No Start Date: _______________________ Completion Date: _______________________ Describe: _________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________ Re: SWDM Adjustment No. ________________ Part 8 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN Community Plan: ____________________________________________________________________ Special District Overlays: ______________________________________________________________ Drainage Basin: _____________________________________________________________________ Stormwater Requirements: _____________________________________________________________ Part 9 ONSITE AND ADJACENT SENSITIVE AREAS  River/Stream ________________________  Lake ______________________________  Wetlands ____________________________  Closed Depression ____________________  Floodplain ___________________________  Other _______________________________ _______________________________  Steep Slope __________________________  Erosion Hazard _______________________  Landslide Hazard ______________________  Coal Mine Hazard ______________________  Seismic Hazard _______________________  Habitat Protection ______________________  _____________________________________ none none none none none N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A REFERENCE 8-A: TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET 2017 City of Renton Surface Water Design Manual 12/12/2016 Ref 8-A-3 Part 10 SOILS Soil Type ______________________ ______________________ ______________________ ______________________ Slopes ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ Erosion Potential _________________________ _________________________ _________________________ _________________________  High Groundwater Table (within 5 feet)  Other ________________________________  Sole Source Aquifer  Seeps/Springs  Additional Sheets Attached Part 11 DRAINAGE DESIGN LIMITATIONS REFERENCE  Core 2 – Offsite Analysis_________________  Sensitive/Critical Areas__________________  SEPA________________________________  LID Infeasibility________________________  Other________________________________  _____________________________________ LIMITATION / SITE CONSTRAINT _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________  Additional Sheets Attached Part 12 TIR SUMMARY SHEET (provide one TIR Summary Sheet per Threshold Discharge Area) Threshold Discharge Area: (name or description) Core Requirements (all 8 apply): Discharge at Natural Location Number of Natural Discharge Locations: Offsite Analysis Level: 1 / 2 / 3 dated:__________________ Flow Control (include facility summary sheet) Standard: _______________________________ or Exemption Number: ____________ On-site BMPs: _______________________________ Conveyance System Spill containment located at: _____________________________ Erosion and Sediment Control / Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention CSWPP/CESCL/ESC Site Supervisor: _____________________ Contact Phone: _________________________ After Hours Phone: _________________________ Vashon Till 2-25%N/A section 3 pg 3-1 section 3 pg 3-1 section 2 pg 2-2 N/A N/A N/A Flows exit the site and proceed through a series of culverts and roadside ditches crossing state route 515. All 9 requirements are required 12/6/16 Detention Pipe N/A Michael S. Place, PE (425)409-2505 (253)255-7805 1 REFERENCE 8: PLAN REVIEW FORMS AND WORKSHEET TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET 12/12/2016 2017 City of Renton Surface Water Design Manual 8-A-4 Part 12 TIR SUMMARY SHEET (provide one TIR Summary Sheet per Threshold Discharge Area) Maintenance and Operation Responsibility (circle one): Private / Public If Private, Maintenance Log Required: Yes / No Financial Guarantees and Liability Provided: Yes / No Water Quality (include facility summary sheet) Type (circle one): Basic / Sens. Lake / Enhanced Basic / Bog or Exemption No. _______________________ Special Requirements (as applicable): Area Specific Drainage Requirements Type: SDO / MDP / BP / Shared Fac. / None Name: ________________________ Floodplain/Floodway Delineation Type (circle one): Major / Minor / Exemption / None 100-year Base Flood Elevation (or range): _______________ Datum: Flood Protection Facilities Describe: Source Control (commercial / industrial land use) Describe land use: Describe any structural controls: Oil Control High-Use Site: Yes / No Treatment BMP: _________________________________ Maintenance Agreement: Yes / No with whom? _____________________________________ Other Drainage Structures Describe: N/A N/A Grease Interceptor Used contech Filterra Enhanced Water Treatment Facility Commercial N/A REFERENCE 8-A: TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET 2017 City of Renton Surface Water Design Manual 12/12/2016 Ref 8-A-5 Part 13 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION  Clearing Limits  Cover Measures  Perimeter Protection  Traffic Area Stabilization  Sediment Retention  Surface Water Collection  Dewatering Control  Dust Control  Flow Control  Control Pollutants  Protect Existing and Proposed BMPs/Facilities  Maintain Protective BMPs / Manage Project MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS AFTER CONSTRUCTION  Stabilize exposed surfaces  Remove and restore Temporary ESC Facilities  Clean and remove all silt and debris, ensure operation of Permanent BMPs/Facilities, restore operation of BMPs/Facilities as necessary  Flag limits of sensitive areas and open space preservation areas  Other _______________________ Part 14 STORMWATER FACILITY DESCRIPTIONS (Note: Include Facility Summary and Sketch) Flow Control Type/Description Water Quality Type/Description  Detention  Infiltration  Regional Facility  Shared Facility  On-site BMPs  Other ________________ ________________ ________________ ________________ ________________ ________________  Vegetated Flowpath  Wetpool  Filtration  Oil Control  Spill Control  On-site BMPs  Other ________________ ________________ ________________ ________________ ________________ ________________ ________________ Part 15 EASEMENTS/TRACTS Part 16 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS  Drainage Easement  Covenant  Native Growth Protection Covenant  Tract  Other ____________________________  Cast in Place Vault  Retaining Wall  Rockery > 4′ High  Structural on Steep Slope  Other _______________________________ Detention Pipe Porous Pavement Grease Interceptor Planning Structural Engineering Survey Planning Structural EngineeringSurvey 24Ä.7#Ä% 4'061052'%+#.%#4'6'&ÄÄ604 S F ( w i t h n o attrib u t i n g r u n - o n ) p e r m e a b l e p a v e m e n t f l o w c o n t r o l B M P R u n - o n ( t o p e r m e a b l e p a v e m e n t ) P r o p o s e d P e r m e a b l e F l o w C o n t r o l B M P P e r C O R S W D M C . 2 . 7 1,055 SF (with no attributing run-on)642 SF (with no attrib u t i n g r u n - o n ) 2 , 2 5 5 S F Technical Information Report 2-1 LDC Job No. 16-137 2 Conditions and Requirements Summary This report was produced in accordance with the 2017 City of Renton Surface Water Design Manual (2017 City of Renton SWDM). Per Chapter I of the Manual, the proposed development requires a Full Drainage Review, meeting all nine core requirements as well as all six special requirements, since there will be more than 2,000 square feet of new impervious surfaces and more than 7,000 sf of land disturbing activities. A summary of how each of the minimum requirements is met is described in this section. Core Requirement #1: Discharge at the Natural Location: The existing site runoff discharges the site along the southern and western property boundaries. All site runoff ends up in a roadside ditch located on the north end of SE 172nd ST. In the developed condition all runoff will be conveyed to the previously described natural discharge location. Core Requirement #2: Offsite Analysis: No discernable upstream run-off flows onto the subject property. Onsite runoff discharges as concentrated flow into a roadside ditch and culvert located in the southwest corner of the property. Downstream flows are conveyed in the westerly direction through a series of roadside ditch, culvert, storm pipe, catch basins and natural and engineered drainage swales. No signs of constrictions, capacity issues, erosion or sedimentation were noted along the downstream investigation. See Offsite Analysis in Section 3 of this report. Core Requirement #3: Flow Control: Historic site conditions, assuming all forested, must be used for the predeveloped conditions. Flow control will be provided by a detention pipe facility located beneath the parking and access drive aisle along the western and northern property boundaries. See Flow Control/Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design, section 4 of this report for additional information. Technical Information Report 2-2 LDC Job No. 16-137 Core Requirement #4: Conveyance System: The new pipe system for this project will be sized to meet the 100-year peak flows. See Conveyance System Analysis and Design, section 5, for additional information regarding conveyance analysis and conveyance capacity. Core Requirement #5: Erosion and Sediment Control: See SWPPP Analysis and Design, Section 8 of this Report for the SWPPP BMP Elements. Core Requirement #6: Maintenance and Operations: The stormwater detention and water quality facilities will be maintained by the property owner. An emergency access easement will be granted to the City of Renton. See Operations and Maintenance in Section 10 of this report. Core Requirement #7: Financial Guarantees and Liability: Any required performance or assurance bonds will be posted with the City as required. Core Requirement #8: Water Quality: Based on the 2017 City of Renton SWDM, this project must meet the requirements of the Enhanced Basic Water Quality Treatment. The proposed enhanced treatment facility is a Filterra Bioretention Systems an approved method by 2017 RSWDM section 14-A. See Flow Control/Water Quality Analysis and Design in Section 4 of this report for additional information. Core Requirement #9: On-site BMPs: The 2017 City of Renton SWDM requires that all target surfaces must provide onsite BMPs to the maximum extent feasible to mitigate impacts of increased stormwater surface runoff per Large Lot BMP Requirements, section C.1.3.2. Permeable Pavement is the only feasible BMP applied to the site per section C.2.7, satisfying the onsite BMP requirements. Additionally all pervious surfaces will be protected in accordance with the soil amendment BMP detailed in Appendix C, Section C.2.1.3. See Flow Control/Water Quality Analysis and Design in Section 4 of this report for additional information. Technical Information Report 2-3 LDC Job No. 16-137 Special Requirement #1: Other Adopted Area-Specific Requirements: There are no Critical Drainage Areas, Master Drainage Plans, Basin Plans, Salmon Conservation Plans, Stormwater Compliance Plans, Lake Management Plans, Flood Hazard Reduction Plan Updates, or Shared Facility Drainage Plans within the vicinity of this project. Therefore, this requirement does not apply to the project. Special Requirement #2: Flood Hazard Area Delineation: Per the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map 53033C0979 F, the site is located in Zone C corresponding to an area outside of the 500-year flood plain. Therefore, there are no flood hazard areas (100-year floodplains, zero-rise flood fringe, zero-rise floodway, FEMA floodway, or channel migration zones) on or adjacent to this site. Therefore, this requirement does not apply to the project. Special Requirement #3: Flood Protection Facilities: There are no levees or revetments on or adjacent to this site. Therefore this requirement does not apply to the project. Special Requirement #4: Source Controls: Source controls such as wheel wash stations and utility corridor maintenance are proposed within the SWPPP and TESC plan. Special Requirement #5: Oil Control: Based on the Traffic Analysis report by Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc dated June 2016 there are an estimated 150 ADT for the whole site which is a total of 65,715 sf. The threshold for requiring oil control is 100 ADT per 1,000 SF , since our site will only bring in a total of 150ADT for the site the proposed site does not exceed the threshold. Special Requirement #6 Aquifer Protection Area: This project is not within an aquifer protection area and is therefore not applicable to this project. Technical Information Report 3-1 LDC Job No. 16-137 3.0 OFFSITE ANALYSIS Task 1. Study Area Definition and Maps King County LiDAR, survey, and 2012 aerial photography were the best topographical references available for the area containing the site. The limits of downstream analysis extended roughly 0.25 miles from the site’s natural discharge location. Please reference Task 3 below for a detailed description of the downstream flow path (See Figure 3.0 Downstream Analysis Map). Task 2. Resource Review All of the resources below have been reviewed for existing and potential issues near the project site:  Adopted Basin Plans No Adopted Basin Plans were located that include the project site.  Drainage Basin This site is located within the Panther Creek drainage sub basin. The sub basin flows are tributary to the Black River and ultimately to the Duwamish River.  Floodplain / Floodway (FEMA) maps According to FEMA mapping this project is not within a floodplain.  Sensitive Areas Sensitive areas are not located on the site.  Drainage Complaints and Studies According to email correspondence with Ann Fowler, on 10/13/2017, there are not any drainage complaints of concern in or near the subject property’s downstream flow path.  Road Drainage Problems No issues were identified near the proposed site. Technical Information Report 3-2 LDC Job No. 16-137  Wetland Inventory Maps There are no wetland areas located on or downstream of the proposed subject property. This has been verified in the critical areas study as completed by others  Section 303d List of Polluted Waters The proposed subject property is not tributary to any 303d listed waters within ¼ of a mile from the subject property.  Stormwater Compliance Plans Not applicable to the proposed project. Task 3. Field Inspection On Tuesday December 6th, 2016 upstream and downstream analyses were performed at the site. The following observations were verified during this visit. Please refer to Figure 3.0, Downstream Analysis Map, for reference locations. Upstream Analysis As observed on December 6th, 2016 site visit, there is no discernable upstream flow entering the proposed site. Downstream Analysis Runoff from the subject property discharges the site at the southwest property boundary and enters a 12” concrete driveway culvert located on the northern side of SE 172nd St. Flows continue westward through the roadside ditch and are redirected southerly, crossing SE 172nd St via a 12” concrete culvert, and are discharged into an open densely vegetated parcel to the south. Flows then enter an 18 inch concrete culvert, flow westerly, crossing State Route 515 Benson Dr. S, and are discharged into an engineered open channel located on a private parcel. Open channel flows are mitigated via 12”+ riprap and flows enter an 18” PVC pipe. Tightlined flows are conveyed westerly via 18” PVC pipe along S 36th St., crossing the ¼ mile downstream analysis extent boundary. !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( 2 5 0 2 6 0 2 7 0 2 8 0 2 9 0 3 1 0 3 3 0 4 2 0 4 1 0 3 9 0 380 370 2 9 0 3 2 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 2 2 0 2 3 0 2 4 0 4 0 0 3 9 0 3 8 0 3 7 0 3 6 0 4 1 0 4 0 0390 2 3 0 2 4 0 3 2 0 3 3 0 3 4 0 3 3 0 3 4 0 200 2 1 0 2 6 0 2 7 0 2 8 0 2 9 0 1 9 0 4 1 0 2 4 0 2 5 0 410 3 1 0 3 0 0 340 3 6 0 380350 3 7 0 4 2 0 4 3 0 1 9 0 3 0 0 350 3.0FIGURE: PROJECTION: WASHINGTONSTATE PLANE, NORTH ZONE,NAD 83 HARN, FEET JOB NUMBER: 16-137DRAWING NAME: 16-137F03 DRAWING BY: T.ABBOTTDATE: 12-07-16SCALE: AS SHOWNJURISDICTION: RENTON DESIGNER: T.ABBOTT REVISION: S O U R C E I N F O R M A T I O N D E S C R I P T I O N S O U R C E A G E N C Y 1 6 -1 3 7 D o w n s t r e a m A n a l y s i s M a p .m x d | M O D : 1 2 /0 7 /2 0 1 6 | D E W VICINITY MAP 1 7 0 3 3 1 0 8 T H A V E S E , R E N T O N , W A 9 8 0 5 5 R E N T O N S P E C I A L C A R E C O M M U N I T Y D O W N S T R E A M A N A L Y S I S M A P K I N G C O U N T Y G I S C O N T O U R S G E N E R A T E D F R O M B A R E E A R T H L i D A R (K I N G C O U N T Y ). T H I S D A T A H A S A S T A T E D V E R T I C A L A C C U R A C Y O F A P P R O X I M A T E L Y 1 F O O T . T H E C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G G R O U P C o m m e r c i a l I n f r a s t r u c t u r e R e s i d e n t i a l 1 4 2 0 1 N E 2 0 0 t h S t ., #1 0 0 W o o d i n v i l l e , W A 9 8 0 7 2 P h . 4 2 5 .8 0 6 .1 8 6 9 w w w .L D C c o r p .c o m F x . 4 2 5 .4 8 2 .2 8 9 3 P A R C E L B O U N D A R Y C I T Y O F R E N T O N G I S S R - 5 2 2 MAPPED EXTENT 1 0 8 t h A v e S E 1 0 8 t h A v e S E SE 172nd St A E R I A L S E X P R E S S , I N C . A E R I A L I M A G E R Y H W Y 1 6 7 ¬«515 !(1 !(2!(3!(4 q Scale in Feet 200 0 200 10 Foot Contour Contours (LiDAR) 2 Foot Contour LEGEND Subject Property Downstream Flowpath Storm Node Parcel Boundary Storm System !( Parcel Boundary Technical Information Report 3-3 LDC Job No. 16-137 Image 1: Downstream flow conveyed in SE 172nd St roadside ditch Image 2: Concentrated flows are discharged from 18” concrete culvert crossing Benson Dr S (State Route 515) into an open channel heading westward Technical Information Report 3-4 LDC Job No. 16-137 Image 3: Open channel flows are mitigated with riprap and collected and conveyed westward via 18” PVC storm drain pipe Image 4: Downstream flows are conveyed westerly through a series of catch basins and 18” storm drain pipe located in S 36th St, crossing the ¼ mile downstream analysis extent threshold Technical Information Report 4-1 LDC Job No. 16-137 4.0 FLOW CONTROL/WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN The flow control and water quality requirements are identified in the 2017 City of Renton Surface Water Design Manual. Pre-Developed Conditions: See the following page, Figure 4.1 Existing Hydrology Map, for a graphical depiction of the pre-developed hydrology. See below for the areas as modeled in WWHM4: Targeted Basin: Forested 1.65 Acres Total 1.65 Acres Developed Conditions: See the following page, Figure 4.2 Developed Hydrology Map, for a graphical depiction of the developed hydrology. See below for the areas as modeled in WWHM4: Basin A (tributary to detention facility): Pervious landscape 0.39 Acres Impervious 0.96 Acres Total 1.25 Acres Pervious Pavement (tributary to detention facility): Pervious Pave 4,556 SF Total 0.10 Acres Detention Bypass: Pervious 0.23 Acres Impervious 0.07 Acres Total 0.30 Acres 4 1 0 410 3 9 0 4 0 0 390 4 0 0 4 0 0 4 1 0 4 1 0 4.1FIGURE: PROJECTION: WASHINGTONSTATE PLANE, NORTH ZONE,NAD 83 HARN, FEET JOB NUMBER: 16-137DRAWING NAME: 16-137F04 DRAWING BY: D.WESTLEYDATE: 9-6-17SCALE: AS SHOWNJURISDICTION: RENTON DESIGNER: D.WESTLEY REVISION: S O U R C E I N F O R M A T I O N D E S C R I P T I O N S O U R C E A G E N C Y 1 6 -1 3 7 P r e d e v e l o p e d H y d r o l o g y M a p .m x d | M O D : 9 /0 6 /2 0 1 7 | T P A VICINITY MAP R E N T O N S P E C I A L C A R E C O M M U N I T Y , L L C R E N T O N S P E C I A L C A R E C O M M U N I T Y E X I S T I N G H Y D R O L O G Y M A P K I N G C O U N T Y G I S C O N T O U R S G E N E R A T E D F R O M B A R E E A R T H L i D A R (K I N G C O U N T Y ). T H I S D A T A H A S A S T A T E D V E R T I C A L A C C U R A C Y O F A P P R O X I M A T E L Y 1 F O O T . T H E C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G G R O U P C o m m e r c i a l I n f r a s t r u c t u r e R e s i d e n t i a l 1 4 2 0 1 N E 2 0 0 t h S t ., #1 0 0 W o o d i n v i l l e , W A 9 8 0 7 2 P h . 4 2 5 .8 0 6 .1 8 6 9 w w w .L D C c o r p .c o m F x . 4 2 5 .4 8 2 .2 8 9 3 q Scale in Feet 0 40 80 10 Foot Contour Contours (LiDAR) 2 Foot Contour LEGEND Subject Property Parcel Boundary P A R C E L B O U N D A R Y C I T Y O F R E N T O N G I S S R - 5 2 2 MAPPED EXTENT Watercourse 1 0 8 t h A v e S E 1 0 8 t h A v e S E SE 172nd St A E R I A L S E X P R E S S , I N C . A E R I A L I M A G E R Y DEVELOPED BASIN ATOTAL = 1.69 AC DEVELOPED BASIN ATOTAL = 1.69 AC GRIND AND OVERLAY 410 3 9 0 4 0 0 390 4 0 0 4 0 0 4 1 0 4 1 0 4 1 0 4.2FIGURE: PROJECTION: WASHINGTONSTATE PLANE, NORTH ZONE,NAD 83 HARN, FEET JOB NUMBER: 16-137DRAWING NAME: 16-137F4.2 DRAWING BY: D.WESTLEYDATE: 9-06-2017SCALE: AS SHOWNJURISDICTION: RENTON DESIGNER: D.WESTLEY REVISION: S O U R C E I N F O R M A T I O N D E S C R I P T I O N S O U R C E A G E N C Y 1 6 -1 3 7 D e v e l o p e d H y d r o l o g y M a p .m x d | M O D : 9 /0 6 /2 0 1 7 | T P A VICINITY MAP R E N T O N S P E C I A L C A R E C O M M U N I T Y , L L C R E N T O N S P E C I A L C A R E C O M M U N I T Y D E V E L O P E D H Y D R O L O G Y M A P K I N G C O U N T Y G I S C O N T O U R S G E N E R A T E D F R O M B A R E E A R T H L i D A R (K I N G C O U N T Y ). T H I S D A T A H A S A S T A T E D V E R T I C A L A C C U R A C Y O F A P P R O X I M A T E L Y 1 F O O T . T H E C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G G R O U P C o m m e r c i a l I n f r a s t r u c t u r e R e s i d e n t i a l 1 4 2 0 1 N E 2 0 0 t h S t ., #1 0 0 W o o d i n v i l l e , W A 9 8 0 7 2 P h . 4 2 5 .8 0 6 .1 8 6 9 w w w .L D C c o r p .c o m F x . 4 2 5 .4 8 2 .2 8 9 3 q Scale in Feet 0 40 80 10 Foot Contour Contours (LiDAR) 2 Foot Contour LEGEND Subject Property Parcel Boundary P A R C E L B O U N D A R Y C I T Y O F R E N T O N G I S S R - 5 2 2 MAPPED EXTENT Watercourse 1 0 8 t h A v e S E 1 0 8 t h A v e S E SE 172nd St A E R I A L S E X P R E S S , I N C . A E R I A L I M A G E R Y DEVELOPED BASIN A1.35 AC DEVELOPED BASIN AREAS DEVELOPED BASIN A TOTAL TOTAL =1.35 ACPERVIOUS0.39 AC LID PERMEABLE PAVEMENT 0.10 AC IMPERVIOUS 0.96 AC BYPASS BASIN TOTAL = 0.30 AC FLOW CONTROL MITIGATION TRADE* NON-TARGET EXISTING PAVEMENT TO FLOW CONTROL FACILITY=3,500 SF ROW PAVEMENT FLOW CONTROL BYPASS =200 SF PRIVATE DRIVE PAVEMENT FLOW CONTROL BYPASS =1,800 SF FLOW CONTROL BYPASS TOTAL =0.30 AC PERVIOUS 0.23 AC IMPERVIOUS 0.07 AC NON-TARGET IMPERVIOUS SURFACE EXISTING PAVEMENT 3,500 SF TARGET SURFACE AREA BYPASS TOTAL =3,500 SFPRIVATE DRIVE PAVEMENT 1,800 SF ROW PAVEMENT 200 SF MITIGATION TRADE NET TOTAL =0 SFTARGET (BYPASS)- 3,500 SF NON-TARGET (TO FC)3,500 SF * ALL AREAS NOTED ARE PGIS.CALCULATIONS REFLECT PGIS TRADE CALCULATIONS. PAVEMENT FLOW CONTROL BYPASS = 1,500 SF ROW PAVEMENT 1,500 SFGRIND AND OVERLAY Technical Information Report 4-2 LDC Job No. 16-137 4.1 Flow Control Facility Based on the City of Renton’s flow control map and City of Renton Municipal Code 4- 6-030.c., the site falls within the Flow Control Duration Standard (for Forested Site Conditions). Flow control standards shall be according to the 1.2.3.B of the 2017 RSWDM. Flow control performance “shall match the predeveloped site’s discharge duration for the discharge rates between fifty percent (50%) of the two (2) year peak flow through the fifty (50) year peak flow and the two (2) and ten (10) year peak discharge assuming forested site conditions as the predeveloped site condition”. The proposed detention pipe facility has been designed in accordance with the City of Renton SWDM design criteria in section 5.1.2.1, general requirements for Detention Tanks. Flow control compliance modeling and analysis has been assessed using WWHM 4 in accordance with the 2017 City of Renton SWDM section 5.1.2.2. WWHM Modeled Detention Pipe Pipe Diameter: 8’ Pipe Length: 480’ Bottom of Pipe: 390.00 Sediment Storage: 0.5’ Begin Live Storage: 391.50 Live Storage Depth: 7.0’ Top of Riser Elevation: 398.50 Freeboard: 0.5’ Top of Pipe Elevation: 399.00 See the following pages for the WWHM 4 project report containing predeveloped and mitigated land use description, detention facility hydraulic table, predeveloped and mitigated hydrology and release rates, and analysis passing report summary. Flow Control Mitigation Trade A flow control facility mitigation trade is utilized per 2017 City of Renton SWDM section 1.2.3.2.G, Mitigation Trades. The project’s onsite flow control facility has been designed to mitigate for an area of existing non-targeted impervious surface area located in the 108th AVE SE frontage road in trade for not mitigating part of the Technical Information Report 4-3 LDC Job No. 16-137 project’s targeted impervious surfaces that cannot be vertically routed to the proposed flow control facility. The target impervious surface areas being traded are a portion of the 108th AVE SE ROW and a portion of the private drive aisle at the southwestern portion of the site. The proposed mitigation trade meets or exceeds conditions, #1 through #5, per section 1.2.3.2.G. Condition 1: Both the non-targeted existing pavement and both ROW pavement flow control bypass areas are made up of roadway runoff. The non- target pavement flow are similar in peak flow and volume as the ROW pavement control bypass as seen in Figure 4.2. Condition 2: The non-targeted existing pavement, and area identified to be traded is all within the same drainage basin and all flows converge without an easement. Condition 3: The same amount of PGIS is being traded both from ROW which results in a similar amount of runoff volume which means the net effect will essentially be zero for this trade. Condition 4: There are no sensitive downstream drainage systems downstream of the project site thus there would not be a significant adverse impact downstream to this trade. Condition 5: The area proposed to be traded is ROW pavement and will not be developed further in the future besides pavement restoration. Condition 6: Mitigation trade proposals must be reviewed and approved with input from the City of Renton. Please see Figure 4.2, Developed Hydrology Map, for a graphical depiction of the proposed flow control mitigation trade areas. Technical Information Report 4-4 LDC Job No. 16-137 Additional target surfaces that cannot be routed to the onsite flow control facilities will be modeled in WWHM as bypass, per the conditions listed in the 2017 City of Renton SWDM section 1.2.3.2.E all the conditions are met as follows: Condition 1: The bypass trade both onsite and offsite are both within the same drainage basin and converge within a quarter mile downstream. Condition 2: The bypass increase does not exceed 0.4 cfs as seen in the WWHM 4 output. Condition 3: There are no sensitive downstream drainage systems downstream of the project site thus there would not be a significant adverse impact downstream due to the bypass. Condition 4: The bypass trade will be collected and treated for water quality. Condition 5: The difference between the peak 100-year discharge using 15-min time steps compared to the existing site conditions does not exceed 0.15 cfs. The flow control facility provides additional storage volume to account for the bypass flows without receiving the bypass flows. Please see Figure 4.2, Developed Hydrology Map, for a graphical depiction of the proposed flow control bypass areas. See WWHM4 model output for just bypass predeveloped and developed pre-mitigated (701) flows following WWHM4 Project Report. WWHM4 PROJECT REPORT DR A F T 20170918_ConstructionSizing 9/20/2017 8:30:05 AM Page 2 General Model Information Project Name:20170918_ConstructionSizing Site Name: Site Address: City: Report Date:9/20/2017 Gage:Seatac Data Start:1948/10/01 Data End:1998/09/30 Timestep:15 Minute Precip Scale:1.000 Version Date:2016/11/23 POC Thresholds Low Flow Threshold for POC1:50 Percent of the 2 Year High Flow Threshold for POC1:50 Year DR A F T 20170918_ConstructionSizing 9/20/2017 8:30:05 AM Page 3 Landuse Basin Data Predeveloped Land Use Basin 1 Bypass:No GroundWater:No Pervious Land Use acre C, Forest, Flat 1.64 Pervious Total 1.64 Impervious Land Use acre Impervious Total 0 Basin Total 1.64 Element Flows To: Surface Interflow Groundwater DR A F T 20170918_ConstructionSizing 9/20/2017 8:30:05 AM Page 4 Mitigated Land Use Basin 1 Bypass:No GroundWater:No Pervious Land Use acre C, Pasture, Flat 0.29 Pervious Total 0.29 Impervious Land Use acre ROADS FLAT 0.35 ROOF TOPS FLAT 0.39 SIDEWALKS FLAT 0.21 Impervious Total 0.95 Basin Total 1.24 Element Flows To: Surface Interflow Groundwater Tank 1 Tank 1 DR A F T 20170918_ConstructionSizing 9/20/2017 8:30:05 AM Page 5 Bypass Bypass:Yes GroundWater:No Pervious Land Use acre C, Pasture, Flat 0.23 Pervious Total 0.23 Impervious Land Use acre ROADS FLAT 0.03 SIDEWALKS FLAT 0.04 Impervious Total 0.07 Basin Total 0.3 Element Flows To: Surface Interflow Groundwater DR A F T 20170918_ConstructionSizing 9/20/2017 8:30:05 AM Page 6 Routing Elements Predeveloped Routing DR A F T 20170918_ConstructionSizing 9/20/2017 8:30:05 AM Page 7 Mitigated Routing Porous Pavement 1 Pavement Area:0.1031 acre.Pavement Length: 67.00 ft. Pavement Width: 67.00 ft. Pavement slope 1:0.03 To 1 Pavement thickness: 0.5 Pour Space of Pavement: 0.35 Material thickness of second layer: 2 Pour Space of material for second layer: 0.35 Material thickness of third layer: 0 Pour Space of material for third layer: 0 Infiltration On Infiltration rate:0.05 Infiltration safety factor:1 Total Volume Infiltrated (ac-ft.):12.312 Total Volume Through Riser (ac-ft.):0.073 Total Volume Through Facility (ac-ft.):12.384 Percent Infiltrated:99.42 Total Precip Applied to Facility:0 Total Evap From Facility:1.011 Element Flows To: Outlet 1 Outlet 2 Tank 1 Porous Pavement Hydraulic Table Stage(feet)Area(ac.)Volume(ac-ft.)Discharge(cfs)Infilt(cfs) 0.0000 0.103 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0333 0.103 0.001 0.000 0.005 0.0667 0.103 0.002 0.000 0.005 0.1000 0.103 0.003 0.000 0.005 0.1333 0.103 0.004 0.000 0.005 0.1667 0.103 0.006 0.000 0.005 0.2000 0.103 0.007 0.000 0.005 0.2333 0.103 0.008 0.000 0.005 0.2667 0.103 0.009 0.000 0.005 0.3000 0.103 0.010 0.000 0.005 0.3333 0.103 0.012 0.000 0.005 0.3667 0.103 0.013 0.000 0.005 0.4000 0.103 0.014 0.000 0.005 0.4333 0.103 0.015 0.000 0.005 0.4667 0.103 0.016 0.000 0.005 0.5000 0.103 0.018 0.000 0.005 0.5333 0.103 0.019 0.178 0.005 0.5667 0.103 0.020 0.252 0.005 0.6000 0.103 0.021 0.308 0.005 0.6333 0.103 0.022 0.356 0.005 0.6667 0.103 0.024 0.398 0.005 0.7000 0.103 0.025 0.436 0.005 0.7333 0.104 0.026 0.471 0.005 0.7667 0.104 0.027 0.504 0.005 0.8000 0.104 0.029 0.535 0.005 0.8333 0.104 0.030 0.564 0.005 0.8667 0.104 0.031 0.591 0.005 0.9000 0.104 0.032 0.617 0.005 0.9333 0.104 0.033 0.643 0.005 DR A F T 20170918_ConstructionSizing 9/20/2017 8:30:05 AM Page 8 0.9667 0.104 0.035 0.667 0.005 1.0000 0.104 0.036 0.690 0.005 1.0333 0.104 0.037 0.713 0.005 1.0667 0.104 0.038 0.735 0.005 1.1000 0.104 0.039 0.756 0.005 1.1333 0.104 0.041 0.777 0.005 1.1667 0.104 0.042 0.797 0.005 1.2000 0.104 0.043 0.817 0.005 1.2333 0.104 0.044 0.836 0.005 1.2667 0.104 0.046 0.855 0.005 1.3000 0.104 0.047 0.873 0.005 1.3333 0.104 0.048 0.891 0.005 1.3667 0.104 0.049 0.909 0.005 1.4000 0.104 0.050 0.926 0.005 1.4333 0.104 0.052 0.943 0.005 1.4667 0.104 0.053 0.960 0.005 1.5000 0.104 0.054 0.976 0.005 1.5333 0.105 0.055 0.993 0.005 1.5667 0.105 0.057 1.009 0.005 1.6000 0.105 0.058 1.024 0.005 1.6333 0.105 0.059 1.040 0.005 1.6667 0.105 0.060 1.055 0.005 1.7000 0.105 0.061 1.070 0.005 1.7333 0.105 0.063 1.084 0.005 1.7667 0.105 0.064 1.099 0.005 1.8000 0.105 0.065 1.113 0.005 1.8333 0.105 0.066 1.128 0.005 1.8667 0.105 0.068 1.142 0.005 1.9000 0.105 0.069 1.155 0.005 1.9333 0.105 0.070 1.169 0.005 1.9667 0.105 0.071 1.183 0.005 2.0000 0.105 0.073 1.196 0.005 2.0333 0.105 0.074 1.209 0.005 2.0667 0.105 0.075 1.222 0.005 2.1000 0.105 0.076 1.235 0.005 2.1333 0.105 0.077 1.248 0.005 2.1667 0.105 0.079 1.261 0.005 2.2000 0.105 0.080 1.273 0.005 2.2333 0.105 0.081 1.286 0.005 2.2667 0.105 0.082 1.298 0.005 2.3000 0.105 0.084 1.310 0.005 2.3333 0.106 0.085 1.322 0.005 2.3667 0.106 0.086 1.334 0.005 2.4000 0.106 0.087 1.346 0.005 2.4333 0.106 0.089 1.358 0.005 2.4667 0.106 0.090 1.370 0.005 2.5000 0.106 0.093 1.381 0.005 2.5333 0.106 0.097 1.393 0.005 2.5667 0.106 0.100 1.404 0.005 2.6000 0.106 0.104 1.415 0.005 2.6333 0.106 0.108 1.562 0.005 2.6667 0.106 0.111 1.822 0.005 2.7000 0.106 0.115 2.154 0.005 2.7333 0.106 0.118 2.546 0.005 2.7667 0.106 0.122 2.988 0.005 2.8000 0.106 0.125 3.477 0.005 2.8333 0.106 0.129 4.007 0.005 2.8667 0.106 0.132 4.575 0.005 DR A F T 20170918_ConstructionSizing 9/20/2017 8:30:05 AM Page 9 2.9000 0.106 0.136 5.179 0.005 2.9333 0.106 0.140 5.817 0.005 2.9667 0.106 0.143 6.488 0.005 3.0000 0.106 0.147 7.188 0.005 DR A F T 20170918_ConstructionSizing 9/20/2017 8:30:05 AM Page 10 Tank 1 Dimensions Depth:8 ft. Tank Type:Circular Diameter:8 ft. Length:470 ft. Discharge Structure Riser Height:7.5 ft. Riser Diameter:18 in. Orifice 1 Diameter:0.5 in.Elevation:0.5 ft. Orifice 2 Diameter:1.125 in.Elevation:5.73 ft. Orifice 3 Diameter:0.5 in.Elevation:6.5 ft. Element Flows To: Outlet 1 Outlet 2 Tank Hydraulic Table Stage(feet)Area(ac.)Volume(ac-ft.)Discharge(cfs)Infilt(cfs) 0.0000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0889 0.018 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.1778 0.025 0.003 0.000 0.000 0.2667 0.031 0.005 0.000 0.000 0.3556 0.035 0.008 0.000 0.000 0.4444 0.039 0.011 0.000 0.000 0.5333 0.043 0.015 0.001 0.000 0.6222 0.046 0.019 0.002 0.000 0.7111 0.049 0.023 0.003 0.000 0.8000 0.051 0.028 0.003 0.000 0.8889 0.054 0.032 0.004 0.000 0.9778 0.056 0.037 0.004 0.000 1.0667 0.058 0.043 0.005 0.000 1.1556 0.060 0.048 0.005 0.000 1.2444 0.062 0.053 0.005 0.000 1.3333 0.064 0.059 0.006 0.000 1.4222 0.066 0.065 0.006 0.000 1.5111 0.067 0.071 0.006 0.000 1.6000 0.069 0.077 0.007 0.000 1.6889 0.070 0.083 0.007 0.000 1.7778 0.071 0.089 0.007 0.000 1.8667 0.073 0.096 0.007 0.000 1.9556 0.074 0.102 0.008 0.000 2.0444 0.075 0.109 0.008 0.000 2.1333 0.076 0.116 0.008 0.000 2.2222 0.077 0.122 0.008 0.000 2.3111 0.078 0.129 0.009 0.000 2.4000 0.079 0.136 0.009 0.000 2.4889 0.079 0.143 0.009 0.000 2.5778 0.080 0.151 0.009 0.000 2.6667 0.081 0.158 0.010 0.000 2.7556 0.082 0.165 0.010 0.000 2.8444 0.082 0.172 0.010 0.000 2.9333 0.083 0.180 0.010 0.000 3.0222 0.083 0.187 0.010 0.000 3.1111 0.084 0.195 0.011 0.000 3.2000 0.084 0.202 0.011 0.000 3.2889 0.084 0.210 0.011 0.000 DR A F T 20170918_ConstructionSizing 9/20/2017 8:30:05 AM Page 11 3.3778 0.085 0.217 0.011 0.000 3.4667 0.085 0.225 0.011 0.000 3.5556 0.085 0.232 0.011 0.000 3.6444 0.086 0.240 0.012 0.000 3.7333 0.086 0.248 0.012 0.000 3.8222 0.086 0.255 0.012 0.000 3.9111 0.086 0.263 0.012 0.000 4.0000 0.086 0.271 0.012 0.000 4.0889 0.086 0.278 0.012 0.000 4.1778 0.086 0.286 0.013 0.000 4.2667 0.086 0.294 0.013 0.000 4.3556 0.086 0.301 0.013 0.000 4.4444 0.085 0.309 0.013 0.000 4.5333 0.085 0.317 0.013 0.000 4.6222 0.085 0.324 0.013 0.000 4.7111 0.084 0.332 0.013 0.000 4.8000 0.084 0.339 0.014 0.000 4.8889 0.084 0.347 0.014 0.000 4.9778 0.083 0.354 0.014 0.000 5.0667 0.083 0.362 0.014 0.000 5.1556 0.082 0.369 0.014 0.000 5.2444 0.082 0.376 0.014 0.000 5.3333 0.081 0.384 0.014 0.000 5.4222 0.080 0.391 0.015 0.000 5.5111 0.079 0.398 0.015 0.000 5.6000 0.079 0.405 0.015 0.000 5.6889 0.078 0.412 0.015 0.000 5.7778 0.077 0.419 0.023 0.000 5.8667 0.076 0.426 0.028 0.000 5.9556 0.075 0.433 0.032 0.000 6.0444 0.074 0.439 0.035 0.000 6.1333 0.073 0.446 0.037 0.000 6.2222 0.071 0.452 0.040 0.000 6.3111 0.070 0.458 0.042 0.000 6.4000 0.069 0.465 0.044 0.000 6.4889 0.067 0.471 0.046 0.000 6.5778 0.066 0.477 0.050 0.000 6.6667 0.064 0.482 0.052 0.000 6.7556 0.062 0.488 0.055 0.000 6.8444 0.060 0.494 0.057 0.000 6.9333 0.058 0.499 0.059 0.000 7.0222 0.056 0.504 0.061 0.000 7.1111 0.054 0.509 0.063 0.000 7.2000 0.051 0.514 0.064 0.000 7.2889 0.049 0.518 0.066 0.000 7.3778 0.046 0.522 0.068 0.000 7.4667 0.043 0.526 0.069 0.000 7.5556 0.039 0.530 0.279 0.000 7.6444 0.035 0.533 0.941 0.000 7.7333 0.031 0.536 1.830 0.000 7.8222 0.025 0.539 2.831 0.000 7.9111 0.018 0.541 3.830 0.000 8.0000 0.000 0.542 4.717 0.000 8.0889 0.000 0.000 5.410 0.000 DR A F T 20170918_ConstructionSizing 9/20/2017 8:30:05 AM Page 12 Analysis Results POC 1 + Predeveloped x Mitigated Predeveloped Landuse Totals for POC #1 Total Pervious Area:1.64 Total Impervious Area:0 Mitigated Landuse Totals for POC #1 Total Pervious Area:0.52 Total Impervious Area:1.123053 Flow Frequency Method:Log Pearson Type III 17B Flow Frequency Return Periods for Predeveloped. POC #1 Return Period Flow(cfs) 2 year 0.041538 5 year 0.063061 10 year 0.074565 25 year 0.086168 50 year 0.093021 100 year 0.098633 Flow Frequency Return Periods for Mitigated. POC #1 Return Period Flow(cfs) 2 year 0.036604 5 year 0.049231 10 year 0.058611 25 year 0.071678 50 year 0.082332 100 year 0.093809 Annual Peaks Annual Peaks for Predeveloped and Mitigated. POC #1 Year Predeveloped Mitigated 1949 0.046 0.034 1950 0.067 0.059 1951 0.104 0.089 1952 0.032 0.028 1953 0.025 0.029 1954 0.037 0.034 1955 0.064 0.034 1956 0.051 0.061 1957 0.039 0.039 1958 0.045 0.033