The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutR-396224Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Q Q Q W Q U J Q U w 13- W Z O Z W Ir E a 03 N r� i Do 0 N d5 0 n a� 0 a TREE INVENTORY Calip LD 54" above Dripline No. 'Grade Radius Botanical Name Co Health & Condition Rating Name (1 low - 5 high) Health & Condition Description Numerous water shoots on trunk, weak 1 30 12' Populus trlcocarpa Black Cottonwood 3 wood, branch and litter drop. Multi -stem* 6 trunks, a few downward 2 11"M** 18' Acer macrophyllum Big Leaf Maple 3 arching branches. 3 1 12" 8' Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir 3 4 5 28" 10"** 28" 6' Pseudotsuga menziesii Acer macrophyllum Douglas Fir Big Leaf Maple 5 1 6 18" 8' Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir 3 7 8" 5' Acer macrophyllum Big Leaf Maple 2 8 8" M 8' Acer macrophyllum Big Leaf Maple q 9 14" 10, Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir q 18" I 11, IThuja plicata IWestern Red Cedar 1 3 11 30** 1 12' Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir 3 12 30" 20' Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir q 13 I 20" I 8' JPseudotsuga menziesii IDouglas Fir I 3 14 1 10" 1 8' (Pseudotsuga menziesii IDouglas Fir I 2 15 22"M**I 15' JAcermacrophyllum Bigleaf Maple 2 16 20" 8' Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir q 17 12" M 12' Acer macrophyllum Bigleaf Maple 2 18 20" 15' Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir q 19 14"** 12' Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir q 20 12" 6' Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 3 21 16" 6' Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 3 22 18" 6' Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 3 23 16" 6' Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 3 24 20" 6' Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 3 25 I 12" 6' Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 3 26 8" 10, Tsuga heterophylla Western Hemlock 3 27 10" 10, Tsuga heterophylla Western Hemlock 3 28 8" 10, Tsuga heterophylla Western Hemlock 3 29 I I 10" 10, Tsuga heterophylla Western Hemlock 3 30 24" 21' Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir q 31 24" 21' Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir q 32 14" 10, Thuja plicata Western Red Cedar 4 33 26" 11' Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir q 34 46" 35' Acer macrophyllum Bigleaf Maple 5 35 14" 10, Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir 3 36 32" 18, Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir q 37 32" 15' Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir 3 38 24" M 16, Acer macrophyllum Bigleaf Maple 3 39 12" 6' Acer macrophyllum Bigleaf Maple 2 40 12" M 10, Acer macrophyllum Bigleaf Maple 3 41 12" 9' Acer macrophyllum Bigleaf Maple q 42 12" ** 9' Acer macrophyllum Bigleaf Maple 3 43 12" 5' Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir q 44 24" 25' Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir 5 45 24" 20, Thuja plicata Western Red Cedar 3 46 18" M** 12, Acer macrophyllum Bigleaf Maple q 47 10" 10, Acer macrophyllum Bigleaf Maple 3 48 1 12" 12, Tsuga heterophylla Western Hemlock 1 49 20" 8' Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir q 50 I 10" I 5' AAcer macrophyllum Bigleaf Maple I i 51 32" 1 12, Acer macrophyllum Bigleaf Maple 1 52 18" 18' Malus pumila Apple i 53 12" 12' Malus pumila Apple 2 54 12" 15, Malus pumila Apple 1 55 12" 10' Acer macrophyllum Bigleaf Maple q 56 10" ** 10' Malus pumila Apple 1 Several dead limbs, phototropic lean Good condition. Broken central leader, minor dead wood, downward growing branches. Growing into tree #4. Significant hole at base, deadwood in canopy. Multi -stem 3 small stems in addition to main trunk. Minor dead wood in canopy. Significant broken branch, trunk is forked at mid point, several broken branches. Several dead limbs, trunk is girdled near base, straight and strong central leader. A few dead limbs, straight and strong central leader Numerous dead limbs, straight central leader, thin canopy. Broken central leader. Multi -stem 5 stems - 6"-10" calip each. Growing into base of tree #16. Crack in one trunk, several dead limbs. Straight central leader, a few small dead limbs. Tree #15 is growing into base. Multi -stem 4 stems - 6"-10" dia. Several broken trunks, mis-shapen/singled sided canopy. Strong central leader, some dead wood in canopy Slight phototropic lean Broken central leader, some dead wood. Straight leader, thin canopy, low aesthetic value. Straight leader, thin canopy, low aesthetic value. Straight leader, thin canopy, low aesthetic value. Straight leader, thin canopy, low aesthetic value. Straight leader, thin canopy, low aesthetic value. Mis-shapen canopy (one-sided). Mis-shapen canopy (one-sided). Mis-shapen canopy (one-sided). Mis-shapen canopy (one-sided). A few dead limbs. A few dead limbs. Nails in trunk A few dead limbs, small second trunk A few low hanging limbs Mis-shapen canopy (one-sided), leaning, a few broken branches A few broken limbs Mis-shapen canopy (one-sided). Multi -stem 6" to 8", slightly mis-shapen. Broken limbs, cracked trunk, phototropic lean Multi -stem, phototropic lean, slightly mis-shapen. Thin canopy, but overall good form Thin canopy, but overall good form Very minimal canopy Good overall form Canopy is bare at crown indicating possible defect of ailment Multi -stem 4 trunks 5" -8" dia. Good leader, but several dead branches Poor health and poor canopy condition Mis-shapen canopy Mis-shapen trunk - was once a multi -stemmed tree but several trunks have been removed leaving a large stump with one remaining trunk Mis-shapen trunk - was once a multi -stemmed tree but several trunks have been removed leaving a large stump with three remaining trunks Poor health and poor canopy condition, possible indications of disease Poor health and poor canopy condition, possible indications of disease Poor health and poor canopy condition, possible indications of disease Straight trunk, good overall form Poor health and poor canopy condition, ;bl d NE 114 OF THE SW 114 AND 5E 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4, SEC 29, TWN 29, RGE 5 E, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Removal due to Significant Tree Hazard or Priority (RMC Landmark proposed Remove / 4.4.130) Tree R.O.W. Retain Hazard / Landmark R.O.W. Remove 2.ii. R.O.W. Remove Hazard / R.O.W. Remove 1.v. R.O.W. Remove Hazard / R.O.W. Remove 2.ii. R.O.W. Remove Hazard / R.O.W. Remove 2.ii R.O.W. Remove 2.ii. R.O.W. Remove Hazard / R.O.W. Remove Hazard / R.O.W. Remove i. I Landmark Hazard / R.O.W. Remove Hazard / R.O.W. Remove 2.ii. 1.v. R.O.W. R.O.W. Remove Remove Hazard/ R.O.W._ Remove 1.v. Remove 2A. Remove Hazard Remove R.O.W. Remove 2.iii. R.O.W. Remove 2.iii. R.O.W. Remove 2.iii. R.O.W. Remove 2.iii. R.O.W. Remove 2.ii. R.O.W. Remove 2.ii. R.O.W. Remove 2.ii. R.O.W. Remove 2A. R.O.W. Remove 1.v. R.O.W. Remove l.v. Remove 2.ii. Remove 1.v. Remove 1.i. Landmark Remove 2.ii Remove l.i. Landmark Remove 1. i. Landmark R.O.W. Remove 1.v. R.O.W. Remove 2.ii Remove 2.ii Hazard / R.O.W. Remove 2.ii Remove 2.ii Remove 2.ii Remove 1.v. Remove Hazard Remove 2.ii. Remove 2.ii. Hazard Remove Hazard Remove 1.v. 2.ii Hazard Hazard Remove Hazard Remove Hazard Remove Hazard Remove NOTES: 1. NO CRITICAL AREAS OR BUFFERS EXIST ON THE SITE. 2. PROPERTY LINE IS THE CLEARING EXTENT. ALL VEGETATION WITHIN PROPERTY LINE TO BE REMOVED. 3. NO SITE IMPACTS DUE TO TREE REMOVAL ARE ANTICIPATED. 4. SEE L100 LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR LOCATION, TYPE AND SIZE OF REPLACEMENT TREES PROPOSED TO MITIGATE TREE REMOVAL. M = MULTI -STEM (CALIPER = LARGEST TRUNK PLUS SQUARE ROOT OF SUM OF ALL OTHER TRUNKS SQUARED (CITY OF SEATTLE METHODOLOGY) ** = CALIPER MEASURED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ALL OTHER CALIPER MEASUREMENTS FROM SURVEY BY OTHERS. LEGEND < 7N a EXISTING TREE posse a In lcatlons of disease I I Hazard I Remove 1 REVISED PER HEARING EXAMINER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GM 7-14-17 architecture 4 2 — LANDSCAPEREVIEWAND PRICING - GM 79� 17 suRveED: scA_e planning VERTICAL: NAVD 1988 !y landscape architecture [�REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS 8 16-17 --- , » HORIZONTAL: NAD 1983/1991 urba n design 8-16 �9-21-17 DESIGNED: __ 20— 0geospatial analysis 4 REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS GM REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS DRAW"COTTAGES 1925 Post Alley, Suite 36 wSTAFEJGrr5 GM 3-17 GM a-f Seattle, WA 98101 ,AN R,APE�A MREC� 6 REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS GM 12-15-17 CHECKED: I ONE iNc" DATUM Renton F NOUONECNCH Phone 206.650.8589 7 REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS SCP 02-05-18 CO - SCALE ACCORDINGLY www.eimplan.com/seattle 4 f °� �0°` -- -- APrRovED: "" "' 972 NO. REVISION �y DATE APPR __— TREE NUMBER (SEE INVENTORY LIST) TREE TO BE REMOVED TREE TO REMAIN R=3 96224 20 40 :M CITY OF It (D RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Deo- I SIGNIFICANT TREE PRIORITIZATION Priority One I. Landmark trees; ii. Significant trees that form a continuous canopy; iii. Significant trees on slopes greater than twenty percent (20%); iv. Significant trees adjacent to critical areas and their associated buffers; and v. Significant trees over sixty feet (60') in height or greater than eighteen inches (18") caliper. Priority Two i. Healthy tree groupings whose associated undergrowth can be preserved; ii. Other significant native evergreen or deciduous trees; and iii. Other significant non-native trees. Priority Three Alders and cottonwoods shall be retained when all other trees have been evaluated for retention and are not able to be retained, unless the alders and/or cottonwoods are used as part of an approved enhancement project within a critical area or its buffer. RMC 4-4-130 iN COMPLIANCE WITH CITY OF i EVCIN SIANDARD RENTON SPECIAL CARE COMMUMITY, LLC RENTON SPECIAL CARE COMMUMI TY 17033108TH AVE SE, RENTON, WA 98055 TREE INVENTORY & PROTECTION PLAN U Q J ■ LV cc v rQ V LQ ;Al'_ _L 30OOK - �AGr: ------ - O :RAW'.NG N0. E-000 Lai s #4 #