HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA-06-051_Misct
REPORT City of Renton
Department of Planning I Building I Public Works
&
DECISION ADMINISTRATIVE SHORT PLAT AND VARIANCE REPORT & DECISION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW REPORT
SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST
Report Date: June 6, 2006
Project Name Syrbu Short Plat
Owner/Applicant Vyacheslau & Natalya Syrbu
1917 Jones Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98056
File Number LUA-06-051, SHPL-A. V-A, Project Manager Valerie Kinas!, Associate Planner
ECF
Project Description The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Short Plat
Review for the subdivision of a 0.54-acre site zoned Residential -8 (R-8) into two lots. The
lots are intended for the eventual development of detached single family homes. Lot 1 would
be 14,269 sq. ft. and Lot 2 would be 9,016 sq. ft .. The site contains an approximately 887.5
square foot area of regulated protected steep slopes (40% and over). After required
deduction for critical area, the net density for the proposal is 4.12 du/ac. One 3,960 sq. ft.
existing single-family dwelling is to remain on proposed Lot 1. The existing house would
retain direct access from Jones Ave. NE and the new lot would be accessed via an access
easement over the front lot, Loi 1. The applicant has also requested an administrative
variance in order to reduce the required 20 ft. rear yard setback to 1 O ft. from the proposed
access easement for the existing house and 1.25 ft. for the existing deck. A variance is also
requested to reduce the rear yard setback of the deck from the property line from 20 ft. to 18
ft.
Project Location 1917 Jones Ave. NE
N
t
'Project Location Map . SHPL & £,RC report
City of Renton P/8/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED June 6, 2006 PROJECT LUA-06-051, SHPL-A, V-A, ECF Page2
1.
2.
Project Description/Background
The proposal is to subdivide the existing 0.54-acre site into 2 lots retaining the existing 3,960 square foot
single-family dwelling at the front of the new lot. The site is Residential-8 (R-8) zoning designation. An 887.5
square foot area of protected steep slopes is located at the west end of the property, where the lot abuts
Washington State DOT public-right-of way for 1-405.
The site is located in the 1900 block of Jones Ave. NE at 1917 Jones Ave. NE. The existing house would be
retained on Lot 1 and would continue to have direct access from Jones Ave. NE. The lot created at the back of
the property, Lot 2, would access to Jones Ave. NE via an access easement running north of the existing
home. The lots are proposed at the following sizes: Lot 1 is 14,269 square feet and Lot 2 is 9,016 square feet.
The buildable lot area for Lot 2 would be affected by the Native Growth Protection Area Easement to be
recommended by staff to ensure protection of the protected steep slopes. With the deduction of the critical
areas the net square footage of Lot 2 would be 8,128.5 square feet. Both lots would meet the minimum 5,000
square feet required for new lots in the R-8 zone.
A rear yard variance is necessary in order for the existing home to be retained and the lot to be subdivided.
The variance is requested by the applicant to reduce the required 20-foot rear yard setback of the house from
the edge of the access easement behind the house. The variance would reduce the rear yard setback of the
house to 1 O feet from the access easement and the deck to 1.25 from the access easement. The applicant
has also requested to have the required 20-foot setback from the rear property line reduced to 18 feet for the
deck.
The site contains approximately 887.5 square feet of protected steep slopes (40% and over) and 1,235 square
feet of access easement area. Therefore the net acreage of the site is 0.485 and the resulting net density for 2
lots would be 4.12 dwelling units per acre (2/0.485 = 4.12).
Most of the subject is site is relatively flat with the site dropping off steeply at the rear. The flat portion of the
site is vegetated primarily with grass and some shrubs. The steep portion of the site is vegetated with
blackberry. The two trees on the site, a fruit tree and a fir, are proposed to be retained. The protected steep
slopes are critical areas according to the City of Renton Municipal Code, so the proposed short plat is subject
to State Environmental Polley Act (SEPA) review.
Surface water on the developed site would be managed on-site with an infiltration system. According to the
geotechnical report submitted with the short plat application, the soils on the site consist of the Indianola Series
(lnC), which classify as "loamy fine sand" and Sand-Silt(SM) trace gravel. Below this is Quaternary
Recessional Outwash (QvR). The soils would require a minimum setback area of 20 feet from the crest of the
slope and conventional spread footing foundations, according to the geotechnical report.
Environmental Review
In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only
those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and
environmental regulations.
A.
-··.
Environmental Impacts
The proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Deparlments and Divisions to determine
whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to
occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal
is likely to have the following probable impacts:
1. Earth
Impacts: No grading or clearing of the site is proposed. Excavation will be done for the sewer stub on
the relatively flat segment of the lot. Construction of the new home could potentially impact the steep
slopes at the rear of the site. The submitted geotechnical report by Bergquist Engineering Services,
dated March 1, 2006, recommends that the foundations for the new homes be set back at least 20
feet from the crest of the steep slope in order to protect the steep slopes. In order to mitigate potential
impacts to the protected slopes, staff recommends that the applicant be required to follow the
submitted geotechnical report. As stated in the report, vegetation offers slope stability. For this
reason; staff has recommended as a condition of short. plat approval, listed below in this document
under Section 3. Administrative Shott Plat and Variance ~Reporl & Decision, Section J. Decision, that
a Native.Growth Protection Easement be.pf.!ced over.the protected slope and its 20-ft. buffer. Staff·
· shpltrpt.doc "'· , .J-..
City of Renton P/BIPW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED June 6, 2006 PROJECT LUA-06-051, SHPL-A, V-A, ECF Page 3
also recommends as a condition of short plat approval, that a note be added to the face of the short
plat, requiring that if invasive species, such as blackberry, are removed, native species be planted to
insure slope stability. Staff further recommends in the Short Plat Decision below, that a permanent
split rail fence is also recommended by staff as a condition of short plat approval along the edge of the
Native Growth Protection Easement.
In order to reduce the potential for erosion and control sedimentation to the site and to adjacent
properties, staff also recommends that the applicant be required to install temporary erosion control
measures, and to follow the Department of Ecology's (DOE) 2001 Stormwater Management Manual:
Mitigation Measures:
• The applicant shall follow the recommendations found in the submitted geotechnical report by
Bergquist Engineering Services. dated March 1, 2006.
• Temporary erosion control measures shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the
Department of Ecology Standards to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development
Services Division for the duration of the project's construction.
Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations
2. Plants
Impacts: The protected slope is vegetated with blackberry, which according to the geotechnical report
serves to stabilize the slope. As a condition of short plat approval, staff recommends that the
applicant be required to place a native growth protection easement over the protected part of the
steep slope. Within a native growth protection easement, native vegetation must be protected, but
invasive species may be removed. In order to assure that if the blackberry shrubs are removed, the
slope is not left unvegetated and unstable, staff has also recommended as a condition of short plat
approval, that the Native Growth Protection Easement include wording that upon removal of invasive
species, native plants shall be planted to assure slope stability.
Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation measures required.
Policy Nexus: NA
B. Recommendation
C.
Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible
Officials make the following Environmental Determination:
DETERMINATION OF
NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period.
Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period
with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period.
Mitigation Measures
DETERMINATION OF
NON· SIGNIFICANCE· MITIGATED.
XX Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period.
Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period
with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period.
1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations found in the submitted geotechnical report by
Bergquist Engineering Services, dated March 1, 2006.
2. Temporary erosion control measures shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the
Department of Ecology Standards to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development
Services Division for the duration of the project's construction.
D. Comments of Reviewing Departments
shpltrpt. doc
The proposal-has been circulated to City Departmental( Divisional Reviewers for their review.
Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as
Mitigation.Measures and/or Notes to Applicant.
...1f_ Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File.
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED June 6, 2006 PROJECT LUA-06-051, SHPL-A, V-A, ECF Page4
3.
Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report.
Administrative Short Plat and Variance -Report & Decision
This decision on the administrative land use actions is made concurrently with the environmental
determination.
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Owners of Record:
2. Zoning Designation:
Vyacheslau & Natalya Syrbu
1917 Jones Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98056
Residential-8 (R-8)
3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Residential Single Family
4. Existing Site Use: The site is currently developed with one existing single-family dwelling
approximately 3,960 square feet.
3. Neighborhood Characteristics:
North: Single-family residential (R-8 zone)
East: Jones Avenue NE and single-family residential (R-8 zone)
South: Single-family residential (R-8 zone)
West: Interstate 405
6. Access: Access to the proposed lots would be provided directly off of Jones Avenue NE and via
an access easement located partially on the lot to the north and partially on the front lot of the short
plat.
7. Site Area: 23,286 square feet (0.54 acres)
B. HISTORICAUBACKGROUND:
Action
Comprehensive Plan
Zoning
Annexation
Hawken Short Plat
Access Easement
C. PUBLIC SERVICES:
Utilities
Land Use File No.
NIA
NIA
NIA
LUA-95-079
SHPL, V
NA
Ordinance No.
5099
5100
1827
NA
Rec. No.
2006012600925
Date
11/1/2004
11/1/2004
0510311960
02/15/1996
01/26/2006
1. Water: The site is within the City of Renton water service area. There is an 8-inch watermain
within the existing roadway. The project site is located in the 435-water pressure zone. The site
is within Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2. Fire Flow available to the site is approximately 2,000
gpm. Static water pressure is approximately 75psi.
2. Sewer: There is an 8-inch sewer main adjacent available to serve the site.
3. Surface Water/Storm Water: There are 12-inch storm drainage pipelines within the existing
roadway.
4. Streets: There is currently a paved and partially improved public right-of-way along the frontage
of this site.
5. Fire Protection: City of Renton Fire Department.
D. APPLICABLE. SECTIONS OF THE. RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE.:
1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts
Section 4-2-020: Purpose and lnteni.of Zoning Districts
shp/trpt. doc
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED June 6, 2006 PROJECT LUA-06-051, SHPL·A. V-A, ECF
Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table
Page5
Section 4-2-120: Commercial Neighborhood Development Standards
2. Chapter 3 Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts
Section 4-3-050: Critical Areas Regulations
3. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards
Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations
4. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards
Section 4-6-060: Street Standards
5. Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations
Section 4-7-080: Detailed Procedures for Subdivision
Section 4-7-120: Compatibility with Existing Land Use and Plan-General Requirements and
Minimum Standards
Section 4-7-130: Environmental Consideration -General Requirements and Minimum
Standards
Section 4-7-150: Streets -General Requirements and Minimum Standards
Section 4-7-180: Industrial and Commercial Blocks and Lots-General Requirements and
Minimum Standards
6. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria
7. Chapter 11 Definitions
E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
1. Land Use Element-Residential Single Family
2. Community Design Element
3. Environmental Element
F. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS:
shpitfptdoc
1. Staff Review Comments
Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and
address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official
file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this
report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report.
2. Consistency With Short Plat Criteria
Approval of a plat is based upon several factors. The following short plat criteria have been established
to assist decision-makers in the review of the plat:
a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation
The subject site is designated Residential Single Family (RSF) on the Comprehensive Plan Land
Use Map. The objective established by the RSF designation is to protect and enhance single-
family neighborhoods. The proposal is consistent with the RSF designation in that it would provide
for the future construction of single-family homes. The proposed plat is consistent with the
following Comprehensive Plan objectives and policies for Residential Single Family Land Use,
Community Design and the Environmental Elements:
Land Use Element
Objective LU-FF. Encourage re-investment and rehabilitation of existing housing, and
development of new residential plats resulting in quality neighborhoods that: 1) Are planned at
. urban de(J.sities and implement Growth Management tawets; 2) Promote expansion and use of
public transportation; and 3) Make more efficient use of urban seNices and infrastructure. The
project would add one new residential lot, plus retain the existing residence which would further
Growth Management targets. '
City of Renton P/8/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action·
REPORT AND DECISION DATED June 6, 2006 PROJECT LUA-06--051, SHPL-A, V-A, ECF Page 6
shp/trpt.doc. ·
Policy LU-147. Net development densities should fall within a range of 4.0 to 8.0 dwelling units per
net acre in Residential Single Family neighborhoods. The proposed project for two lots would
arrive at a net density of 4.12 dwelling units per net acre, after deduction of critical areas and
easements, which is within the allowable range of the R-8 zone.
Policy LU-148. A minimum Jot size of 5,000 square feet should be allowed on in-fill parcels of less
than an acre (43,560 sq. ft.) in single-family designations. Allow a reduction in lot size to 4,500
square feet on parcels greater than an acre to create an incentive for aggregation of land. The site
is smaller than one acre and all lots would be greater than 5,000 sq. ft.
Objective CD-K: Sile plans for new development projects for all uses, including residential
subdivisions, should include landscape plans. A conceptual landscape plan was included in the
land use application submittal.
Policy CD-53. Landscape plans for proposed development projects should include public
entryways, street rights-of-way, storm-water detention ponds, and all common areas. A conceptual
landscape plan provides for the required landscaping along the public right-of-way.
Policy CD-55. Maintenance programs should be required for landscaped areas in development
projects, including entryways, street rights-of-way, storm-water retention/detention ponds, and
common areas. The applicant will be required to maintain all common improvements as part
creating a maintenance agreement.
Community Design Element
Objective CD-A: The City's unique natural features, including land form, vegetation, lakeshore,
river, creeks and streams, and wetlands should be protected and enhanced as opportunities arise.
The applicant will be required to protect the steep slope on the site with a native growth protection
easement.
Environmental Element
Objective EN-70: Land uses on steep slopes should be designed to prevent property damage and
environmental degradation, and to enhance greenbelt and wildlife habitat values by preserving and
enhancing existing vegetation to the maximum extent possible. The applicant will be required to
protect the steep slopes on the site in a Native Growth Protection Easement, and provide fencing
and signage for the area.
b) Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation
The 0.54 -acre site (gross area) consists of one parcel designated Residential -8 Dwelling Units
per Acre (R-8) on the City of Renton Zoning Map. The proposed development allows for the future
construction one additional dwelling unit along with associated plat improvements.
Density -The allowed density range in the R-8 zone is a minimum of 4.0 to a maximum of 8.0
dwelling units per acre (du/ac). Net density Is calculated after the deduction of sensitive areas,
areas intended for public right-of-way and private easements from the gross acreage of the site.
The property contains 1,235 sq. ft. of area to be placed in an access easement, and 887 .5 sq. ft. of
protect slopes, which are a critical area.
After the deduction of the 1,235 sq. ft. easement area and 887.5 sq. ft. protected slope area from
23,286 gross sq. ft. (23,286 sq. ft. site -2,122.5 sq. ft. total deducted area = 21,163.5 net sq. ft. or
0.485 net acres), the proposal for two lots would arrive at a net density of 4.12 dwelling units per
acre (2 units / 0.485 acres = 4.12 du/ac). The proposed short plat complies with density
requirements for the R-8 zoning designation.
Lot Dimensions -The minimum lot width required is 50 feet for interior lots and 60 feet for corner
lots. The minimum lot depth is 65 feet. The lot width of Lot 1 is proposed at an average of
approximately 115 ft. and Lot 2 would be an average of approximately 83 ft. Lot 1 would be
approximately 123 ft. in depth and Lot 2 would be approximately 108 ft. in depth. Lot sizes would
be greater than the minimum of 5,000 square feet. All lots comply with the lot dimension
requirl!ments. •
Setbacks -The R-8 zone requires a minimum front yiard of 15 feet for primary structure and 20
feet for attached garages. The minimum rear yard setback is 20 feet. The minimum interior side
, y I,
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED June 6, 2006 PROJECT LUA-06-051, SHPL-A, V-A, ECF Page 7
shpllrpt.'doc
yard setback is 5 feet and the side yard along a street must be at least 15 feet. The existing house
on proposed Lot 1 would meet the front and side yard setbacks. It would not meet the rear yard
setback requirement. The rear yard setback must, by definition, be measured from the edge of the
access easement, which runs along a part of the rear lot line in this case. The existing house
would be only approximately 10 feet from the access easement and would thus require a variance.
Also, the deck at the back of the house would also be within the 20 ft. rear yard setback from the
access easement, at only 1 .25 ft. at one point. The deck would also be only 18 ft. from the rear lot
line at the point where there is no longer an access easement at the back of the lot. The applicant
has requested the necessary rear yard setback variance and an analysis of this request can be
found under Section g. Consistency with Variance Criteria below in this report. The setbacks of
the new house would be verified at the time of building permit submittal.
Building Standards The R-8 zone permits one single-family residential structure per lot. Each of
the proposed lots would support the construction of one detached residential unit. Accessory
structures are permitted at a maximum number of two per lot at 720 square feet each, or one per
lot at 1,000 square feet in size.
Building height in the R-8 zone is limited to 2 stories and 30 feet for primary structures and 15 feet
for detached accessory structures. Maximum building coverage is limited to 35% of the lot area or
2,500 square feet, whichever is greater, for lots over 5,000 square feet in size, and 50% for lots
less than 5,000 square feet in size.
The existing house would meet these standards. It is not over 2 stories or 30 ft. in height and the
proposed lot coverage is 15.8 %. Compliance of the new house with these standards would be
verified prior to the issuance of building permits.
c) Community Assets
The R-8 zone requires off-site landscaping abutting non-arterial public streets (Jones Avenue NE).
A five-foot wide irrigated or drought resistant landscape strip must be installed and if there is
additional undeveloped right-of-way in excess of five feet, this additional width must be
landscaped. Additionally, a minimum of two trees of a City approved species with a minimum
caliper of 1 Y. inches per tree must be planted in the front yard or planting strip of every lot prior to
final building inspection. The proposal's compliance with this standard would be verified prior to the
final building inspection.
A conceptual landscaping plan was included in the submittal for the short plat, illustrating a five-
foot landscape strip at the front of the lot. It also illustrates the two required trees at the front of
each lot of the short plat. This plan meets the landscaping requirements for the short plat. Staff
recommends as a condition of short plat approval, that the applicant be required to install the
landscaping and plant the two trees on the lot with the existing home prior to short plat recording.
The trees on the back lot would need to be planted before an occupancy permit for the new home
can be issued.
d} Compliance with Subdivision Regulations
Streets: No new public streets would be created as part of the proposed short plat. There is
currently a paved and partially improved public right-of-way along the frontage of this site. RMC
section 4-7-150.F of the Subdivision Regulations requires the installation of half street
improvements, including curb, gutter, sidewalk, drainage, street signs, street lights and paving
along the frontage of Jones Avenue NE pursuant to City of Renton Street Standards (RMC section
4-6-060) prior to recording of the short plat unless already in place or deferred by the City. All new
electrical, phone and cable services must be underground. Construction of these franchise utilities
must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording of
the short plat.
The proposed subdivision is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the City's street system.
In order to mitigate transportation impacts, staff recommends as a condition of short plat approval
the payment of a Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 per net new average daily trip
attributed to the project with credit given for the existing residence. The fee for this short plat is
estimated at-$717.75 (2 new lots -1 existing:; 1 lot x 9.57 trij)s per lot= 9.57 trips x $75 per trip=
$717.75). The fee is payable prior to the recording of the short plat.
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED June 6, 2006 PROJECT LUA-06-051, SHPL-A, V-A, ECF Page 8
shpltipl.doc
Blocks: No new blocks will be created as part of the proposed short plat.
Lots: The size, shape and orientation of lots must meet the minimum area and width requirements
of the applicable zoning classification and must be appropriate for the type of development and use
contemplated.
The lots are generally rectangular in shape, although each does become wider toward the back of
the parcel. Both are oriented toward the east, with Lot 1 oriented toward Jones Ave. NE and Lot 2
fronting on the rear of Lot 1.
All lots meet and exceed the minimum lot areas however due to the native growth protection area
easement (NGPA) over the steep slope, the buildable area of lot at the rear is somewhat restricted.
Each of the proposed lots satisfies the minimum dimension requirements of the R-8 zone. The plat
plan does not include setback lines for each lot showing potential building envelopes, but when
considering the required setbacks, as well as access points for each lot, the proposed lots appear
to have sufficient buildable area for the development of detached single-family homes.
e) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries
Access: All lots in a subdivision must insure access to a public street. Lot 1 of the proposed short
plat would access directly from Jones Ave. NE. Lot 2 would access from Jones Ave. NE via an
access easement running over the lot to the north and then across part of the rear of Lot 1, behind
the existing home. The width of 20 ft. for the access easement is sufficient given only the house
on the neighboring lot to the north and the new house on proposed Lot 2 use the easement for
access. A short plat of the lot to the north beyond the neighboring lot has been submitted, the
Dobson Short Plat, and it does not propose use of the 20 ft. access easement. It would have its
own 20-ft. wide access easement next to the 20-ft. easement of the Syrbu Short Plat.
An access easement has been recorded for the segment of the driveway located off-site, on the
neighboring lot. The recorded document no. 20060126000925 only reaches 117 into the lot
though, while the plat plan is showing the easement being 119.06 ft. long. Prior to recording, the
additional approximately two feet will need to be secured. Also, prior to short plat recording, a note
must be placed on the plat plan stating that the segment of the access easement located on Lot 1
must be conveyed and a maintenance agreement recorded when Lot 2 is sold.
Topography: Most of the subject site is relatively flat with the site dropping off steeply at the rear.
The flat portion of the site is vegetated primarily with grass and some shrubs. The steep portion
of the site is vegetated with blackberry. An 887 .5 sq. ft. area of protected steep slopes is located
on the back of the lot. The submitted geotechnical report by Bergquist Engineering Services,
dated March 1, 2006, recommends that the foundations for the new homes be set back at least
20 feet from the crest of the steep slope in order to protect the steep slopes. As part of the
Environmental Review decision, staff recommended as a mitigation measure above in this report,
that the applicant be required to follow the geotechnical report. Also, under Environmental
Considerations below in this section, staff is recommending that the slope and its buffer be placed
in a Native Growth Protection Easement and fenced.
Relationship to Existing Uses: The subject site currently contains a 3,960 sq ft single-family
residence, which is to remain on proposed Lot 1. The properties to the north, south and east of the
subject site are designated Residential -8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) on the City's zoning map
and are developed with single-family homes. To the west is Interstate 405. North of the site,
beyond the neighboring lot, a short plat is current under review, the Dobson Short Plat. The
proposal is consistent with the intent of the both the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code and
would not be out of character with the existing or recent development in the area.
Environmental Considerations: The City's Critical Areas maps depict the presence of protected
steep slopes on the site, and a submitted geotechnical report by Bergquist Engineering Services,
dated March 1, 2006 verifies this. The submitted short plat plan did not depict the protected slope
area. RMC 4-3-050E 4 requires that protected slopes be placed in a Native Growth Protection
Easement. In order to ensure protection of the steep slQpe as recommended in the geotechnical
report, staff recommends as a condition of short plat 3'J1proval, that the protected steep slopes
and tlieif 20-ft. buffer be placed in a Native Growth ''Protection Easement (NGPE) recorded
concurrently with the short plat. The applicant shall include in the Native Growth Protection
Easemerif note on the face of the short plat, the phrase: ~Upo(I removal of invasive species, such
as blackberry; the owners shall plant and maintain native vegetation that offers slope stability.•
Ii'·.,
-. ,. ,~
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED June 6, 2006 PROJECT LUA-06-051, SHPL-A, V-A, ECF Page 9
The Native Growth Protection Area shall be fenced and signage installed prior to recording of the
short plat.
f) Availability and Impact on Public Services (Timeliness)
Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish
services to the proposed development, subject to the condition that the applicant provide Code
required improvements and fees. Fire Prevention staff recommend that the applicant provide
required improvements and fees to offset the impacts to fire services associated with the new
development. The proposal of one additional residential lot to the City would impact the City's Fire
Emergency Services. Therefore, a Fire Mitigation Fee of $488.00 per new single-family lot is
required with credit given for one existing residence. The fee is estimated at $488.00 (2 lots -1
existing residence x $488.00 = $488.00) and is required prior to recording of the short plat.
Schools: The site is located within the boundaries of the Renton School District. Renton School
District No. 403 has indicated that Kennydale Elementary School, McKnight Middle School and
Hazen High School can accommodate the increased student enrollment that may result from the
development of the proposed project, estimated at 0.44 or O (0.44 x 1 = 0.44 or 0) students. The
school district has indicated that these schools would be able to support the additional students
generated by the proposal.
Storm Water. There are 12-inch storm drainage pipelines within the existing roadway. The
applicant proposes infiltration. Drainage must meet the 1990 King County Surface Water Design
Manual. A Surface Water System Development Charge will be assessed at a rate of $759.00 per
single-family dwelling with credit giving for the existing structure. Payment of these fees shall be
required prior to issuance of the utility construction permit.
Water and Sanitary Sewer Utilities: The site is within the City of Renton water service area.
There is an 8-inch watermain within the existing roadway. The project site is located in the 435-
water pressure zone. The site is within Aquifer Protection Area zone 2. Fire Flow available to the
site is approximately 2,000 gpm. Static water pressure is approximately 75 psi. In accordance with
the Fire Department requirement (prior to recording the subdivision), at a minimum, one hydrant
within 300 feet of any proposed single-family structure is required. Additional fire flow and hydrants
are required if the total square footage of the new single-family structures, including the garage,
are greater than 3,600 square feet. The Water System Development Charge will be assessed at
the rate of $1,956.00 per single-family dwelling with credit giving for the existing structure. Payment
of these fees shall be required prior to issuance of the utility construction permit.
There is an 8-inch sewer main adjacent and available to serve the site. The Sewer System
Development Charge is $1,017 per new single-family residence. This fee is due with the
construction permit.
G. Consistency with the Variance Criteria:
shpltrpt.doc,
The applicant has requested variances from the rear yard setback requirement of 20 feet, RMC 4-
2-110A. Setbacks are measured from the lot line and, if present, the edge of the access
easement. The Syrbu Short Plat has an access easement running along a portion of the rear lot
line of Lot 1. The minimum rear yard setback of 20 feet for the existing house and elevated deck
would therefore be measured from the edge of this easement. Because the short plat proposal
would place the access easement closer than 20 feet to the existing house and deck, the applicant
is requesting rear yard variances for the house and deck. The variance request is threefold: 1) A
variance is requested in order to reduce the rear yard setback of the existing house on Lot 1 to 10
feet from the access easement at the rear of the lot. 2) An additional variance is requested to
reduce the required 20-foot rear yard setback from the access easement to 1.25 feet for the
existing deck at the back of the house. 3) And furthermore, a variance is requested to reduce the
required minimum 20-foot setback of the deck from the rear lot line to 18 feet.
The Administrator shall have authority to grant an administrative variance upon making a
determination.-in writing, that the conditions specified below have been found to exist. Section 4-9-
2500.5.a. lists 4 criteria that the Administrator is asked to consider, along with all other relevant
information, in making a decision on an Administrative Variance application. These include the
following:
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED June 6, 2006 PROJECT LUM>&--051, SHPL-A, V-A, ECF Page 10
shpftrpt. '*"'
1. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of
special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography,
location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning
Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other
property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification:
The applicant contends that special circumstances do exist. The existing house is placed on the
lot in such a way that, although there is enough land to create another lot as consistent with the
policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the R-8 zoning designation, it is not possible to short plat
the lot without a rear yard setback variance. While the size of the property and the R-8 zoning of
the property permits the subdivision of the property, an access easement to the rear lot would be
required and the setback to the existing house would be measured from the edge of the easement.
This requirement would either preclude the subdivision of the property or require the removal of a
portion of the existing residence and deck.
With regard to the request for a reduction of the rear yard setback from the house to the access
easement by 1 O feet, staff agrees that there is a hardship in that the lot could not be subdivided
without the setback reduction or the removal of a portion of the house. As to the request for a
reduction of the setback from the deck to the access easement from 20 ft. to 1.25 ft., staff also
recognizes the hardship in that the short plat would also not be possible without the removal of a
portion of the deck. But as to the request for a reduction of the rear yard setback of the deck from
the rear property line from 20 feet to 18 feet, staff does not recognize a hardship. It would be
possible to move the proposed lot line 2 ft. to the west and alleviate the necessity for this particular
variance.
Therefore, staff recognizes that the owners suffer undue hardship with regard to the distance of
the house and deck from the access easement, but does not agree that there is a hardship with
regard to the distance of the existing deck from the proposed rear lot line. For this reason, staff
would recommend denial of the request to reduce the 20-ft. rear yard setback of the deck to the
rear property line to 18 ft. but support the variances to reduce the setbacks of the house and deck
to the access easement.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare
or Injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject
property is situated:
The granting of any of the variances would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare.
Instead, the granting of the variances would allow for infill development as prescribed by the
Comprehensive Plan, while retaining an existing home. As proposed, the short plat would create a
situation where the existing structure meets all required setback and lot coverage requirements
except for the required 20-foot minimum rear yard setback from the access easement and rear lot
line. When a home is built on the new lot, a distance of over 45 feet would still remain if the new
home were built right at the minimum 15-foot front yard setback line. Granting variances for the
existing residence on Lot 1 of the short plat to remain would not create a situation that is
detrimental or injurious to the owners of the houses in question, the new homes or the properties in
the vicinity.
3. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege Inconsistent with the
limitation upon uses of other properties in Iha vicinity and zone in which the subject
property is situated:
Approval of the variance may be considered a grant of special privilege because It would provide
an exception from a zoning standard that limits most properties under the same zoning
designation. However, variances would be supported under identical circumstances where a
property would be short platted to obtain allowable density and an existing house would remain on
one of the IJ8W lots, provided the conditions of approval are .. met.
Staff recommends that a restrictive covenant be placed on 'proposed Lot 1 stating that in the event
the existing residence is destroyed, removed or demoli!l,bed, the construction of a new single
... family residence on Lot 1 shall comply with.all development standards of the underlying zoning
City of Renton P/BIPW Department Administrative land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED June 6, 2006 PROJECT LUA-06-051, SHPL-A, V-A, ECF Page 11
designation at the time of building permit review. This restrictive covenant shall be recorded with
King County and placed on the face of the short plat.
4. That the approval as determined by the Zoning Administrator is a minimum variance
that will accomplish the desired purpose:
With regard to the applicant's proposal to reduce the required 20 ft. rear yard setback for the
existing house and deck from the access easement to 10 ft. and 1.25 ft. respectively, this is the
least necessary in order to short plat the lot and still retain the existing house and deck as they
exist today. The easement is necessary to access the lot that is being created with the short plat
at the rear of the property. Due to the lot size and configuration, it is not possible to ensure access
to the rear lot in a way that the existing home and deck still meets the setback requirements. A
reduction of the 20-foot rear yard setback for the house and deck as measured from the access
easement is the least necessary in order for the owners to short plat their lot and still be able to
retain the existing house.
With regard to the applicant's proposal to reduce the rear yard setback of the existing deck to 18 ft.
from the rear lot line, this is not the least necessary in order to short plat the lot and retain the
house and deck as they stand today. The applicant could move the proposed lot line between Lots
1 and 2 over 2 ft. to the west such that the rear yard setback from the existing deck is at least the
20-foot minimum required in the R-8 zone and still provide access and meet lot size and dimension
requirements. For this reason, staff recommends denial of the reduction of the setback of the
deck from the property line from 20 ft. to 18 ft.
H. FINDINGS:
Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following:
1. Request: The applicant has requested Administrative Short Plat Approval for the Syrbu Short
Plat, File No. LUA-06-051, SHPL-A, V-A, ECF, and for rear yard setback variances for the existing
house and deck.
2. Application: An application was submitted in compliance with the requirements for
conducting short plat and administrative variance review. The applicant's short plat plan and other
project drawings are contained within the official land use file.
3. Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
designations of the Residential Single Family (RSF) land use designation.
4. Zoning: The proposal as presented generally complies with the zoning requirements and
development standards of the Residential -8 (R-8) zoning designation, provided all advisory notes and
conditions of approval are complied with. Variances have been requested where it the applicant has
not been able to meet development standards.
5. Variance: Of the three variances requested by the applicant, one does not comply with the
variance justification requirements, and two do, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval
are com plied with.
6. Subdivision Regulations: The proposal generally complies with the requirements
established by the City's Subdivision Regulations for the short platting of two lots provided all advisory
notes and conditions of approval are complied with.
7. Existing Land Uses: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North Residential -8
(R-8); East: Residential -8 (R-8); South: Residentiat-8 (R-8); and West Residentia/-8 (R-8),
Interstate 405.
8. ERC Review: The City's Environmental Review Committee (ERG) has reviewed the proposal
and issued a determination of non-significance-mitigated (DNS-M) and imposed seven mitigation
measures.
8. Critical Areas: The subject site contains an area of approximately 887.5 square feet of
protected steep slope$.
I. CONCLUSIONS:;·
shpllrpt. doc
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED June 6, 2006 PROJECT LUA--06--051, SHPL-A, V-A, ECF Page 12
1. The subject site is located in the Residential Single Family (RSF) comprehensive plan
designation and generally complies with the goals and policies established for this designation.
2. The subject site is located in the Residential -8 (R-8) zoning designation and complies with the
zoning and development standards established with this designation provided all conditions of approval
and advisory notes are complied with.
3. The proposed two lot short plat generally complies with the subdivision regulations as
established by city code and state law provided all conditions of approval and advisory notes are
complied with.
4. The proposed two lot short plat complies with the street standards as established by city code
provided all conditions of approval and advisory notes are complied with.
5. One of the requested rear yard variances does not comply with the regulations in the city code
regarding variances and staff recommends denial of this variance. Two of the requested rear yard
variances do comply, provided all conditions of approval and advisory notes are complied with, and
staff supports approval of these variances.
J. DECISION:
shp/hpt.do.c
Variance Decision
The administrative variance for the Syrbu Short Plat, File No. LUA-06-051, SHPL-A, V-A, ECF, which
would reduce the rear yard setback of the existing deck from the rear lot line from 20 feet to 18 feet is
denied.
The administrative variances, which would reduce the rear yard setback of the house and deck from
the access easement from 20 feet to 1 O ft. and from 20 ft. to 1.25 ft. respectively is approved subject to
the following condition:
1. The variances are granted only for the existing house and deck on Lot 1 of the Syrbu Short
Plat and not for any future structures. Upon recording of the short plat, a restrictive covenant shall be
placed on Lot 1 , and a note shall be placed on the face of the final short plat, requiring that when the
house and/or deck is destroyed, removed or demolished, or if any additions are made to the home,
new construction must meet the setback requirements at the time of action.
Short Plat Decision
The Syrbu Short Plat, File No. LUA-06-051, SHPL-A, V-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following
conditions:
1. The crest of the slope and the 20-foot slope buffer, as defined by Bergquist Engineering
Services in their geotechnical report dated March 1, 2006, shall be depicted on the short plat plan prior
to short plat recording.
2. The applicant shall establish and record a Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) for the
protected steep slopes and their 20-ft. buffer and include a note of this on the short plat drawing that is
recorded.
3. The applicant shall include in the Native Growth Protection Easement note on the face of the
short plat the phrase: Upon removal of invasive species, such as blackberry, the owners shall plant
and maintain native vegetation that ensures slope stabillty.
4. The Native Growth Protection Easement area shall be fenced with split rail fencing, and
signage installed prior to recording of the short plat. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be
subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the recording of the
final short plat.
5. The access easement that was recorded on the neighboring lot to the north in January of 2006
shall be extended from the 117 feet to the complete length of 11_9-.06, as proposed with the short plat.
This shall be completed prior to short plat recording.
. ~ ... ,
' .... .
;.•, )'
City of Renton P/8/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED June 6, 2006 PROJECT LUA-06-051, SHPL-A, V-A, ECF Page 13
SIGNATURES:
6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each new
average daily trip associated with the project. Credit to be given for one existing residence. The fee
shall be paid prior to the recording of the short plat.
7. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $488.00 per new
single-family lot. Credit will be given for one existing residence. The fee shall be paid prior to recording
of the short plat.
8. A maintenance agreement shall be created concurrently with the recording of the short plat
between proposed Tracts A and B, and the neighboring lot to the north in order to establish
maintenance responsibilities for the shared private access and utility easement and associated
improvements. The agreement shall be placed on the face of the final short plat prior to recording.
9. The required two new trees on Lot 1 shall be planted prior to short plat recording.
10. The required two new trees on Lot 2 shall be depicted on the site plan submitted with the
building permit application for the new home and planted prior to occupancy.
6/t)oo r~
decision date
ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT
The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these
notes are nrovided as information onlv, thev are not subiect to the an=al orocess for the land use actions
Planning
1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise
approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind
the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received.
2. Commercial, multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the
hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays
shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be
permitted on Sundays.
Property Services -Comments for Final Short Plat Submittal
1. Please see attached memo from Property Services regarding revisions and final short plat information.
Fire Prevention
1. A fire hydrant with 1,000-gpm fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single-family structures. If the building
square footage exceeds 3,600 square feet in area, including the garage, the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500
gpm and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structures.
2. Fire department access roads are required to be paved, 20 feet.
3. Dead end access roadways over 700 feet in length are required to have a secondary access.
4. Street addresses shall be visible from a public street.
Plan Review-Surface Water
1. Surface Water System Development Charge is $759 per new dwelling unit. This fee is due with the construction
permit.
2. Drainage requirements must meet the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual.
Plan Review -Sewer
1. The Sewer System Development Charge is $1,017 per new single-family residence. This fee is due with the
construction perm it.
Plan Review-Water
1. Surface Water System Development Charge is $759 per new dwelling unit. This fee is due with the construction
permit.
2. Drainage requirements must meet!he 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual.
3. Fire flow requirement for single-family residences is 1,000 gpm. Hydrants are required within 300 feet of all
structures. Existing hydrants to be counted, as fire protection will be required to be retrofitted with a 5-inch storz
quick disconnect fitting.
shp/trpt. doc
City of Renton PIB/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action ·
REPORT AND DECISION DATED June 6, 2006 PROJECT LUA-o6-051, SHPL-A, V-A, ECF Page 14
Plan Review -Street Im rovements
1. The traffic mitigation fee of 75 per additional generated trip shall be assessed per additional single family home at
a rate of 9.57 trips per day. This fee is payable at time of recording the plat.
2. 2. All new electrical, phone and cable services must be underground. Construction of these franchise utilities
must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording of the short plat.
3. Per City of Renton code the owner is required to install curb, gutter, street lights and sidewalks, along the frontage
of the parcels being developed. This includes Jones Ave NE.
Plan Review -General
1. The site is located in Aquifer Protection Zone 2 and may be subject to additional requirements per City code.
Certain uses require operating permits (RMC 4-9-015). A fill source statement (RMC 4-4-060L4) Is required If
more than 100 cubic yards of fill material will be Imported to the project site. Construction Activity Standards
(RMC 4-4-030C7) shall be followed if during construction, more than 20 gallons of hazardous materials will be
stored on site or vehicles will be fueled on site. Surface Water Management Standards (RMC 4-6-030E2 and 3)-
Biofilters, stormwater conveyance, and water quality ponds may require a groundwater protection liner. Impervious
surfaces shall be provided for areas subject to vehicular use or storage of chemicals.
2. Separate permits for side sewers, water meters, storm drainage connections, landscape irrigation meters and any
backflow devices will be required.
3. A separate permit to cut and cap existing utilities will be required as part of any demolition permits.
4. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards.
5. All required utility; drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to
City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer.
6. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate
and application fee shall be submitted at the sixth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior
to preparing a check, it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit
system.
TRANSMITTED this 1:i" day of June, 2006 to the Owner:
Vyacheslau & Natalya Syrbu
1917 Jones Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98056
TRANSMITTED this 1:i" day of June, 2006 to the Applicant:
Jim Hanson
Hanson Consulting
17 446 Mallard Cove Lane
Mt. Vernon, WA 98274
TRANSMITTED this 1t• day of June, 2006 to the following Parties of Record:
Ziba Wolfe
1801 Jones Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98056
Dennis Banes
1909 Jones Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98056
TRANSMITTED this 1 :i" day of June, 2006 to the following:
Larry Meckling, Building Official
Stan Engler, Fire Marshal
Nell Watts, Development Services Director
Jennifer Henning
Jan Conklin
Kayren Kittrick, Plan Review Supervisor
Carrie Olson
King County Journal
. -Land Use Action Appeals & Requests for Reconsideration
The administrative land. use decision will become final if the decision Is not appealed withirf 14 days of the effective date of
decision. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43,21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680).
shp/ftpt.doc ,
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED June 6, 2006 PROJECT LUA-06-051, SHPL-A, V-A, ECF Page 15
RECONSIDERATION. Within 14 days of the effective date of the decision, any party may request that a decision on a short
plat be reopened by the Administrator. The Administrator may modify his decision if material evidence not readily
discoverable prior to the original decision Is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the
reconsideration request, If the Administrator finds insufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no
further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the
following appeal tlmeframe.
APPEAL. This administrative land use decision will become final If not appealed In writing to the Hearing Examiner on or
before 5:00 PM on June 26, 2005. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-
110. Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-
6510. Appeals must be filed In writing, together with the required $75.00 application fee, to: Hearing Examiner, City of
Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055.
EXPIRATION DATE: The Short Plat approval will expire two (2) years from the date of approval. An extension may be
requested pursuant to RMC section 4-7-080.M.
shpltrpt.cloc
i ~; ;
o.w "" !za:: I
WU.I &~ ~ ...,.. :::E
LLJ''.
(
-~
-~
~
CJTYOFIENTON
~
1"=.!0'
, . ~
-L•I .....
I • ii
I ~
I
I
_..,_ ........ ..... _
--~~ , .... ..... ~
--~-_···~-'I•' t:: , .. , .. ,._,
#Ot"fl'fO"r .... .. ·-= I Of'rl'H"W ·-,.,.. ,...,..,... .. ...
~ ~
RE:COROINQ CE:RTIF'ICATE:
11UP F01t IICIMO na _ Mr°'===----
-. Ar--,.U. IH IOOK'--a, IIIWDS AT
,,_ __ AT 1JC lllalCIT 0, MOMIIR' II AUOOIAJD.
JcN COCMY iVAM1«1t o, lltCOIIOS AND D.ICflOMI' ..
IIEDOltlllHOHO. CITY OF' R£NTON LAND US£ NO. LUA-__ _ SHPL ""-II'-
CITY OF' RE:HTON LAND RE:CORD NO. LND-----
... _ ...
---,,..
l'Oll1ICH or THI! IIOll1HtAST QUARl'EII OF 1111: 50ll1HWESI' Qtwlml OF
SCCTIOH S. TOWNSHJP 2$ HORTH, RAH« a £AST, W.AI,
crrt OF R£HTOH, "1HO COUHIY,M WASHtHalOH
N.E:, 28th ST.
f,,"lt--. .... ,111 -
I
i
-I =,~"i":;;.'\lr,:.. I "', ,... • ..,., t,Mo"
(IJ.f'), Offllf " ..., ,., ....
., .... Offllf " -,.....,. ...
'Iii~ I • 3
I • B J... . N.£. 2otto ST, ~---,,..
I ,J
• ,!
~ i ~ ~
""'-' ...... .,,,, ,.,......_
11* Mw,r WII ,,.,,._,,,,,........, ,,,,,,, ,.._.. 1ft • 1111"'....,,..
flfllf ...._ -, ....... wlft fflt ""'*-t ,....,, ....,-,_.... .t ,,10.000
,-IIOICflD-f...._
.,,;-
!!7.DO'
<1aD ci1 ~ i
_,,_ --_..,.......,...,,.._...,.NN_a ••• ..., ... ..., ,,. ........ ""' ........ ,,,., ..... u.
ffNlflNN,
,w., u. ....... ta ....... "'""" rt ldM ......... ,. ,,,,,,,,
...,,.., ..... UM N--On, Al, I...,,...
ffllt ...... ~ ................ === 1:, i:r.:::::..-=::.. Nw,,,.,.....,....,. I • .........
........... t
c.o. ....... """"llwfllillllM' ..... .,,.......,,,.., !l'il!J•:!: 30' l:tlllal'Hffllt ~..,:,~·:-cJr,;e~~,,, ,..., ,.. .,.... ,....,,....,..
~-illlfffJN H.E. 16th ST,
.. • .. ~ ..
OIWflC ICiUI -mr
11/CHAEL -ll ASSQCIO'!S --stlWlla 11424 llolltlrd CoN Lon., lthwn# V.mon,. ..._ NZ74
(360)a2-IDIT
lflrp p ••• ,.., ...... ,. .... ~ ----.... -="-" nr.,-.,,,.,.JJ. # • tw Jlffl,: D, I
I
smv SHORT PLAT.
Dom ... _,. j Jot Nol ... I
Chlnl .,, WI I st,fff J ol JI
.0£= .. ~
N r 240·
Ill
Q ..
d
~ 1;
245
\
LUA-95-079 SHPL,IV
LHD-20-0183
N 80-44:«,1"N, 247.
1
.,.
270' J;;_""'r under con,,r,;01/on . ·~ ,, •. o., .....
, "''
I
I
JQ,J~
t
concrete wall on property tine
250' ~":, l 260'
265' /
~
i /t I , .,,
I ~
I
-"cee~;, &osemen/ d Ptr A.f. ,1 "nos-o, ., .... -1
6"01,DCJOg25 ~
S0
1 r
~·
r
Total Stt, Area
23,286 ,.,.
0,43 .acres
~TANC£
10.!1!5'
9.25'
4!'.1)1'
$~" Apple
101.oo•
9,o,s •• ,.
0.21 ocres
LOT 2
<136.7>
Cl( i
..!, ".lo.,../ ... , ~ ' -_aj
L-7
14,269 ,.f. net
0,33 ocres
1,254 ,.,. eemt
0.03 qom
12,985 ,.,. . •
.0$ l:lore• gro,
~
~
11'1
LOT I \ \. I ."'i
Ill r' " ... I . .,,.
SI! I ell/sting /IOUH t;. sr s
p, . · "II.II" footprint 2,255 s.f. ooncrele f !J 1,9' I
I , . . I I <.!4.2> i5 I
•. "29.I" -. I ::z "'"'°I
I
._ .._ ooncrtfe (b
. "'o.(f ' I ~ Ss" -~ j •hod J
. 12:S.66' s *1'21;"6'1£ a1o.,,, ..,
. oi
POR, TRACT .!25
c.D. Hlllman•s L'olf• Waiihlng/011 Oor'cle;, cf £den il~ittd,f 110: 5
~
V
(J/,j' ;;.,,,. lori,;n /alls
a tlti rn or,.,rty 1/nti, from
/':t~r,; f,·, <";v,-Int , ·t,rner
· ~--. <t''$_7 5 ~--··< ~" ~; <"/ ~ . . . . • . . ·... . . ...µ: cy.;,,,,C
DE\le(.oF'MENJ,;,!'.!!NNING
f:ITY OF RL--.,, r pN •
MAY -32°F
RECEIVED
""'NTROL MOH I :SJ C/ff .,.u
,--------
' I
i
' I • I • I • I • I
' I
' I • I
' I • I • I • I
' I • I • I • I • I
' I
' /.
' I
' t---
1
' I • I • I • I • I
' I • I • I • I
' I • I
' I
' I • I
' I
' I • I • I
' I • I
i • I
' L-----------------------~~
-
----· ............ -·-.. ---·-----· ---·
-~i~~n~iit~~!I~!~,
:·i-:::·:.
-:\:~:;
.:i~~:
:,:;t::~}:~i;-:.
---------------------------
•
__[ --,---
ca .. r'
or
-··T'----
··· i -
; ,-.
_L __
R-8
·.£· :~.,-1J ··-· ':f-"l..,-
-[NE
ZONING
P/8/PW 'l'l!CJINIC,\I, BDVICl8
U/28/04
' ;····!
~---j t-~~~"
_ ___ : ... r' ___ ,,;--l i ~--~ 2··"·.
lt+-8l,-I --1 r-i------
:: .. ,.: __ ,. ''
----Renton. Ott;, u...tt,I
R-B(P
0 :yo tr' D4
5 T23N R5E E 1/2 .
. 5305
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Bob Mac Onie and
Information ne
Note the City
LND-20-0454
June I, 2006
Valerie Kinas!
~Fesser
hort Plat, LUA-06-051-SHPL
and Legal Description Review
ed the above referenced short plat submittal and have the
action number and land record number, LUA-06-051-SHPL and
e drawing sheets in the spaces already provided
A number of symbols shown ( on the short plat drawing) for what is set at the lot comers are not
identified in the "LEGEND" (Sheet 2 of 2). Review and revise as needed.
Provide short plat and lot closure calculations.
Note discrepancies between bearings and distances ofrecord and those measured or calculated, if
any.
Note all easements, covenants and agreements of record on the drawing. Pacific Northwest Title
Company Plat Certificate, Title Order No. 614233, dated January 26, 2006, notes under
"GENERAL EXCEPTIONS" that there are restrictions contained in an instrument recorded under
King County Rec. No. 9604080542.
The city will provide an address for proposed Tract "B" as soon as possible. Note both addresses
on the short plat drawing.
IC:\Documents and Scttings\nweil\Local ScttingslTemplGWViewer\RV060601.doc
'
•
June 8, 2006
Page 2
On the final short plat submittal, remove all references to decks, topog lines, concrete and other
items not directly impacting the subdivision. These items are provided only for preliminary short
plat approval.
Because the subject property falls within Zone 2 of the City of Renton Aquifer Protection Area,
the Aquifer Protection Notice needs to be noted on the drawing. See the attachment.
The word "WITNESS" is misspelled in the "DECLARATION" statement.
Remove all references to zoning and density (Sheet I of 2) on the final short plat drawing.
Remove the "OWNER" block and the "CONT ACT PERSON" block from the final short plat
drawing.
It is difficult to distinguish the subject short plat lots from Lot I of City of Renton Short Plat No.
LUA-95-79-SHPL, which adjoins said lots on the north and west sides (Sheet 2 of2). It is
suggested that the subject short plat lot Jines be made heavier, and note the bearings and
dimensions of said Lot 1 less prominently. Also, either use a larger type size for Tract "A" and
Tract "B", or reduce the type size for "LOT I" and "LOT 2".
Note that if there are easements, restrictive covenants or agreements to others (City of Renton,
etc.) as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the short plat. The short
plat drawing and the associated document(s) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package.
The short plat will be recorded first (by King County). The recording number(s) for the
associated document(s) are to be referenced on the short plat drawing. Provide spaces for the
recording numbers thereof.
The new private 20' easement for ingress, egress and utilities(?), ("Private Driveway Easement")
is shown for the benefit of future owners of proposed Tract "B". Since the new lots created via
this short plat are under common ownership at the time ofrecording, there can be no new
easements established until such time as ownership of the lots is conveyed to others, together with
and/or subject to specific easement rights.
Add the following Declaration of Covenant language on the face of the subject drawing, if the
previous paragraph applies:
DECLARATION OF COVENANT:
The owners of the land embraced within this short plat, in return for the benefit to
accrue from this subdivision, by signing hereon covenant and agree to convey the
beneficial interest in the new easement shown on this short plat to any and all future
purchasers of the lots, or of any subdivisions thereof This covenant shall run with
the land as shown on this short plat.
The private ingress, egress and utility easement ("Private Driveway Easement") requires a
''New Private Easement for Ingress, Egress and Utilities Maintenance Agreement"
statement. Note the attachment on the drawing.
C:\Documents and Settings\nweil\Local Settings\Temp\GWViewcr\RV060601.doc\n
.::'1{:i·'•
June 8, 2006
Page 3
Fee Review Comments:
The Fee Review Sheet for this review of the preliminary short plat is provided for your use
and information.
C:\Documents and Settings\nweil\Local Settings\Temp\GWViewer\RV06060! .doc\n
•