The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA-08-002_Report 1SHORT PLAT NO------ CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CERTIFICATION APPROVALS: PARKS, PLANNING &: RESOURCES DEPARTMENT E,omlnod ..,d oppro-!his __ day ol 20 __ Mana9"", 8uUdll'I~ .I< LGnd O-.J"9"'*'it D- .!:,amlt,"'<I <md opp~ lhOI __ day al 20-- E"""inood Oll<f appr,,'<$<1 lh11 __ <fay of 20 __ ·-l.ul)-69-- D.puty Anes= RECORDING NO. VOL/PAGE SCALE: kr.-! -=-·-j r I T PORTION OF kt10WAU..PEOPt£B'fll1tsl:PR£SEN1Sthot•t.lh•undon'1f',odawn"" D...,.iopmon\Eng!no..r AQC<Junt~~ JJ 4 04Q-l'4JS NW 1/4 Qf 11-IE SE 1/4 OF SEC i9, lV{N 23 N, RG 5 E, W, .. :!tt:"t!~!!:~~~1~":"2.:t:~1h~~~=the;-";~t·r~~aen\otronl-------------------------------------------.L-----------------------------I ol lht ·-,;ind tMt llhorl -.,b<ll'llllorl .. mm with u.,, frt,(I C<>noiot LUA-XX-XXX-SHPL =<1 !n o.,.,..._~ with 1h <:Sa,b, of th own..-. LEGEND jl,j \r,!!l,l(SS 'MlERfOF" ... Ml O&IC ho,,Q'o and Holl. -· ·-· ACKNOWLEDGMENTS St-ote of W...hin9to,, C<,,.an\~ <Pl _________ _ I eortlfy tho! I lcr>QW llt h•.,.., oati.fQQtory evk!on .. tt,o\ o19n..i tt.lt i..,trumonl ..,., o,o""<>W!N~t,,;I ll tG be (~••/1,or) frM ....:I unt...-y O<ll ror lH ~-<Md puep-monll""N i., tr.t l~~lrum-t 51\ln<1tlll'. of Nol"'Y Public ---------..... -;;;;;;;;..;;;;;;-====== My app ..... l,nont 4.q,!re,, '•'-' Stet. .,f Wqst,JM!on ''" CGYntyot _________ _ I c-orfily that I ,.,,_ or h.,... 11<1tlr.lod"'}' tvld<n'-" that :r,...00:.,..~l~~·i:""ti,~t,,:= ::1:1,~:: !!1>H:.-.t:'1'h':)1n~:!t. Slgnoh,n ol Notc.y Publle ~: 1~,._.i,,,..,, .,..,\it'-• W98Q;,OJ7V03 . i\ til \\ ~ I S 1911-1 S1RE[T RECORDER'S CERTIFICATENo. ----- 1f·ned for record this __ doy of ___ ,20_ at __ in book_of ___ at page ___ ot the request Mo@ic H Touma : ;;;.:..: ~.~'\ON<Jumr ...... LND-XX-3XXX 3 c/ A ;/ ,i / q '2. _.- o FOl!ND REBAR ~ C).p V y V -, -;;, ~ OR IRCN PIPE [S:"1 . • SET t/2• HEABR ,k CAP 0 LS /9470 SCALE 1"=50' ~ •-M-o ..Jl. s.cnON CORNE.e SURVEY NOTES : !l INS~UMENT·. TOPCON GPT .:5000W TOTAL STA 110N t::OQ 1/4 CORNER MEl'HOO USED: FIELD TRAVE'.RSE W.ll-1 ACTUAL ~ FlELD MEASUREt,ffN~ AND ANGLES .on WAC J32-1.30-090 IO DA IT or ~RVEY; .4.F'Rtl 2005 b 8AS1S OF BE'.AAING; S 15th SlREIT (N 69'5:!i'48"W) o S 15TH S1REET CR"'°" I 47& ?~c!~TOoll'!N~~l FWND 1/:r PIN IN Df PptlN'ftR. VS i>Ul£I' D!I ,Ii r;;. SH"TllJC,,: Ji\€ S N • 17322:2.~ 5 ,.,!h 'l'l'UT (0./0:I) ( • 1~7.&&45 . i, .. ,n~ o. .. 1!5.411' ( • 12"2n.02Qe a~ 132.815' z FtlUNO Pl< N<O SHIN£R I 0.06' "Cllllll OF UNE r-~-N89"53'48"W (8.UIS OI' B£AA1lfC) 410.11 {U) 410.00' (P) C(.),jCftE1'E II< ~ s IIDISOH D!I s {Vo:;) ----,r"I,,__~-~ ...... ~ 1 11.$.m' (UI} ~ 11115.S> (M) I , .,.., \ --_ 'i -i r- 1 I --i~w f, ,-OWNER PAK UNG 19::512 47TH A'.£. NE SEATlt.E, WASHINGTON 95155 206-M2-2171 \ \ : REN m1,-n: \ .\ A : ~--i 791,Clll''l'OOS J I LOT I 11 LUA-95·030-SHPL TOI.JM. A.EN. ~. N.EERS &. LAND SURVEYORS I 6632 S 19ht PLACE SUITE E -102 ~ Kl;NT, WA¥1INqTON 9803:?: ~/-_ _ _ _ {425) 251-0665 Cl) / ~f SHORT PLAT DATA 2 I I I ENGINEER / SURVEYOR C • \\o \----.J ____ _J \$ ~ "'' ~ \ l ~ 81 ~ TOTAL SHORT PLAT AREA 21.194 eq. tt. l O • 1 LDT 2 NUMB£R r:F LOTS PROPOSED -J "' a g ZON< • •-• U g Sl.lAU. LOT ARtA -5000 14.tt. I ~ '° DENSITY -6.80 OU/ACRE __ _J _____ _ ' ~~ tn \------ 0,\ • I BLK. 9 4 a,""°""' TCI 8E RD,IO'wm <C I •1 PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE Of NE :,: I ---,_ 9.208,f. --1 (I) 2 -7,00-4 •· f. (Net 5,000 s.f.) UJA-94-151-SHft, J -5,000 s.. f. I ,.., -t9Sll079004 ~ ~ LOT 3 FRONT "' 20 FT. I '° RtAR • 20 FT. <" ~ lGA~A':: j _. J,l.73 ~ ---+-.-~~~~~~--,,-,~~"'"'--="-""-"'e.;:C,C../--"~,~,.~.~~~~-+ 0 9774• LOT 2 ~ -'.} 1 g 30.!11 1 ~ ~ LEGAL DESCRJP:::ARO • 5 FT. 1 ) LOT 5, BLOCK 9 OF C.O HIUMAN'S EARLJr,/GTON GARDENS ,'OOJTIOO TO THE aTY OF SEATl\.E, DIVISION LOTS "'· \\ ":;; .; ,~1,,¥; ' -~' "',:;-(\ ::l: q, 1 HOUSE TO '""J ,, ..... lA i'lr> 200 ,--,.....,R.~lN I Jt; 1/'V. ! . :iL~k-~l~s~ts-69.oa· ;ii ~ I NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT lHEREa", RECOROED IN 11 VOLUME 17 OF' PLATS, PAGE: 74. IN KING COUNTY, ,-----1 ,1 11 WASHINGTON LINE TABLE \ I -rrRl Wo This mop correctly represents o survey mode by me or under my direction ir, conformance with the requirements of the Survey Recording Act at the request of Pak Ung ,n August, 2007 .273.41' N89"5$ 48"W N "' ,; 6 r----l '" lg TOUMA £NG/N££RS \t,(ST VAUEY EXEOJTIVE PARK IS(IJ2 SCl.)ni 1t1ST P\..l,CE.. SUl'ft E-10.2 •!CENT "'' .,,.,..,~ LINE lut' DWN. 8'!' LENGTH BEARING LI 26.78 soo·oe.'12'\J L2 23.06 s:21· 34'.261 \o' l3 26.76 $01'36'42'\,' ~SHORT PLAT 1517 SHATTUCK AVENUE S RENTON, WA 98055 OATS JOB NO. t5 ~ ~ ~ qryplatmailing 02/12/2008 LOT STREET NO STR STREET.NAME SUBDIV .. 1 1517 SHATTUCK AVES UNG SHORT PLAT 2 1522 DAVIS AVES UNG SHORT PLAT 3 1526 DAVIS AVES UNG SHORT PLAT Page 1 i 1 ! ! j! C 6 i I I "i ~ I j 0 I ' I ! 1 l I ' I l ! I 1·1·1" -!~1 ,. .. ~ ... -' I .. ! ''"I I ,, I tt ~ f ~ J ll:11 :!!/J ~: ' ii -i~I 1 .. ~i~~I 'I 1!: ! :~ii:Jt' ' ' I • ' 1:1,1 0 ! ! i§ ,i 0 ' ' ,' : 'f. 0 • <I '! f E ~ ! ~-r C ! ;I " !!' ; -! d ! ,iii: ~ l 0 • ' " i~ t I i " I ' J ! ,;: <r i ', I • ij n " , ., I I j f i ~ n : ! . ! ! I ~ ~ r ~ []J ' !qJ . ij '' ' lJ ro (J> (J) • I I i I ', ll'"ii ,~ "' £: ~2 C :C ! f I ! ~i mm ~n;-tm lJ(j)lJ t I ' "I z () mO [iii ;. 1a !! !1! ]11 %.1 H rIJ:>. ;! ~ •"'" 'IC ~-=Q_ O>m §I ~I i ,;; 'j, f' {)lJ :::j lJ !~~ l ,. M•-,~ J:>.OJ,; ~-i ~. '"Is' !! ,11~ ~o C -t::il) lJC ~r j :, :21"· ! • J m~ r P: '" •1, •-' ' l1i;1~jl i !)_ • -t :;rJ j ,·' I , i' ii! ! •il!l : ~ i ' ! I ~ . i, r, ' i i!U! v " I ! ! I ! I i ' ! L--~ ' : . l i i ' I I ii1w l ' I 'l ·I 0 jl • 0 ~ I I I i -" vi I ,- 7' "' 0 ,!jig ! ! ' ' lJ--< (I> (I> I I : I [ I 1u,oli ,-Zill I ~~m CI: I . i r m HI ~ !1lT ,~ -U(J)-U -OJ () !i1!11111r;::i1 l! j1!~ -< ;!~ !'' 'i' -· ;D_ ~£ rr1> () OS a -~ • ~· ;u :::j lJ !! ,11\QIJ! l"i'~,-§~ l>0,7\ l> ,- f . -C ~ ,-l> I 1 • I I j · I 1;1il~ ~~ J --!JO -< ! • D_ •' --f ' 'I ' I I 11 ·'' II t APPROVALS: DEPARTMENT Of ASSESSMENTS SHORT PLAT NO.----- CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON PARKS, PLANNING & RESOURCES DEPARTMENT E":miood ond <ipprowd this _ My o1 20_ Examinod and ap~o-this __ day of 20 __ Ma1a~. Bulloifi~ & Lond Oe...,.opma,t ~Malon -CERTIFICATION Exam<Md ond oppr~ this-__ day ot 20 __ ~lyAneHor RECORDING NO SCALE: k-~ c:a::::a PORTION OF I VOL/PAGE • L T 3J4040-1435 IOIOW m PEOPU: BY 11-l:Sf PRESENTS th<:rl ••• the undersigned own..s Development U>9"'ffl" -'=-urtl Number NW 1/4 OF TI-iE SE 1/4 OF SEC 19, TWN 23 N, RG 5 [, w.~ ~:'t1':"t.!i,:..!:• ~:1!~%~il,:~~:: !:~!t~e:ientalia, 1-------------------------------------------'-----------------------------I of L',e -..., m,d tl>ot <horl s,;bdi.;sjor, is m<>M' ••lh the frw con1;.1 LUA-XX-XXX-SHPL md o, oe.;ordor\""' .,tt, the-., ol th~ OWlloloro LEGEND ~ IN MTWESS 'M!EREOF" .... •o1 -our hands ""d ...or~ -· ·-· ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Stal• of """*"ingtQn County of---------- 1 ,,..lily that I kno.-or h~-. ..,t;,,foctor-y •'fi-that "'91'~ IM1 ;,,-tNmen\ ond Cc"<no.t.dgo,d H to bo (h,,/h.r) lrH ""d -.nlory ocl f.,,. u,, u-a><1 -m...,1....,-,1 in 11><1 1n.;......,...,; S,,.nalure of Nc,tory Pu~ic ---------,.,~ -.;;;;;;;-;;;;;;--:::-:::-:::-:::-:::-::: My ,WOirJ!-\ Ul)o"e:I Sio1~ ol 'llost,"'9t<>n C.:...,ty ol _________ _ 1 certify that I m ... ar hlMI S<>t,sfwiory "'"°"",,. tf>at ~ignod thfs nl•l"'m""t aid ockn-~ ,t to b~ (hi•/her) fr .. a,d Wllunlary aet tor th• u-ond p,.,rpos,,a montl<>n,..; ;,, tt,., int\n.monl Sig,,ot\U'1! of Ho1ary Public --------- ~t~lmfflt ... p';f.C-#fo090J9003 ~ ~ . " . ' • < : t ~ ! i ; ~ . " " • ~ ~ " ~ . • ~ I s 1g111 sr~n RECORDER'S CERTIFICATENo. Filed for record this_doy of __ ~20_ at_ in book __ of __ at page __ al the request kit ~ounir H. To1JmO "' EX. >JON IN CASE L.ND-xx-xxx • SURFACE BRASS MONUAIENT o FOUND R£BAR &: CAP OR ,RON "'"' "'SI • SET 1/2• RF:ABR .t-CAP L...> lS 19470 SCALE 1 "= 50' W FN0 Pl( NAIL + S€CT10N CORNER l~S~~~r: ~£,.,~~ 3000w TOTAL STATION PO<:J t/4 CORNER ME1HOO USED: FlEl.D TRA'-lt'.RSE WITH ACTUAL FlJUto Pie .... o SH>HER / 0-05' "'()fllH OF' LINE FlaD MEASUREMENTS AND ANGLES WAC 332-130-090 DA TE Of SUR'o£Y: APRIL 2005 BASIS OF BEAAING: S 1:ith S1REET (N B9':!iJ'o48"W) S 15TH S"JREET 0 ~I ~ ;,, I "' 0 0 z 'I -;,+ CR MOIi I •18 ~~ S:~;?'-~ ~g FOUND !/2• PIN IH 1H PIPE IHTEJI. OF' S PUGET DR fl Cl)r,JCRET[ TM CASE: ~ B[NSIJN OR S (!./~) lN'TtR. SHATlVCI< AYlc S N • 17l2.22.i50ll!I .oNO s 15111 STR££1' (04M) E " t:)(»u.7.~ N • 11,2:ze.= D. " ~All' E -ln9292.020!! ll. -132.8&' r--~ ---N89'53''48·w (8Asls Of' BEAAINC) 410.11 (M) 410.00' (P) ~ 1 ~n -. • I 1t5Uf1' (al) ~ 11.56.«) {M) , \ __ I_I_ l--1 I ,,-----OWNER \ Yl-1$)' \ I I I 11.CD' ·r·1 ~~~2u~~ AVE. NE I I ---~~ \ I I I 206-542-2171 I REN SPlfllf-7'i' I 1,l,lllJ'tOOi!I I I I LDT 1 ENGINEER / SURVEYOR I LUA-95-030-SHPL TOUMA ENGINEERS & LANO SURVEYORS \ \ ' I ' I C I • 1· 6.632 s 191:a-t Pt.ACE SUITE E -102 ' .~ KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 I I 2 I ~t-_ _ _ _ ("4-25) 2:i,1-0665 .., U) I ~I SI-IORT PLAT DATA I~ 0 \_ ---_j ----_j ----_j ------· j ~ ··1 g TOTAL SHORT PLAT AREA 21.19-4 sq. ft. \ "'-._ \ l < Si I LDT 2 NUMBER OF LOTS PROPOSED -J '.§. ~ y N b ZONE .. R-8 -:::s c.> C! SMALL LOT AREA ... 5000 sq. ft. !/l \ O I 2 ~ DENSITY -6.60 DU/ACRE \ -,,, ~ 1 ~1 __ _ PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE or NE "' "' r I 1 _ 9.208 s ,. -~ \ -------------------1 en 2 -7,00, • f. (Not 5,000 ,.f.) 'j, V) Bl-K 9 LUA.-94-l~l-SHPL 3 -5,000 s. f. 6'1. ' EX STRIJC'TU'!E"S I,,., •9511~ ~ 1:.\ .._ 'T1J BE RDIO'oal ;: UJT 3 FRONT "' 20 FT. $\ -r I'° REAR•20FT. ~ ¥-"°~J-rA.:.A~ J 173.~2.09· -118.8 -~(11-lj,1_ LEGAL o£scR1P:~ARD -5 FT. <O \ 117 7t,' 8 I LOT 5, BLOCI< 9 Of C D HIUMAN'S EARLINGTON (J'. \ N ~~ w r-.: LOT 1 I GARDENS AOD111CJ,1 TO lHE CITY Of SEATTLE, DIVISION LOTS n -.J NO 1, ACCOROING TO THE PLAT THERECF, RECORDED IN !" / I VOLUME 17 Of PLATS. PAGE; 74, IN KING COUNTY, .----1 e WASHINGTON I I LINE TABLE \ 81; :I~ I~ \ LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTlFICA TE J This map correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of the Survey Recording Act at the request of Pak Ung n August, 2007 BEARING 273.41' , ___ .., 1' LINE I LENGTH NS9'53'489WN :.rr, ' u £2,?8 SOO~w12•v 6 --··-·- £-1·:.'?,. H. ro I'~-~~:,,::,.;--" ~ I jg TOUMA ENGINEERS L2 23,06 s21·34'26'V L3 26.76 $01 '36'42'\J PAK SHORT PLAT 1517 SHATTUCK Av£NUE S RENTON, WA 98055 ~ .!s_ ~ 'lt£ST VAUEY EXEC:Ull'.£ PARK I OWN. BY I DATE 6SJ2 SOOTH 181ST PVC!:. SI.ATE E-102 •KENT, WA~ OAN T AUGUST, 2007 PHl'N" (4:;>:'\\ 7'11...flM.."> ...... , .. .,..., ?<;'-""""' "·-------~-~ TJOB NO. 950-001-071 1':C.L..\Jr"UINI., l'I\J. V\JL./ '""1C. SHORT PLAT NO. CITY OF RENTON,-,W~ASH=~,N~G~TON=e-~ ~-~ I I i i ISSJ SCALE: --PORTION OF NW 1/4 OF lliE SE 1/4 OF SEC 19, 1WN 23 N, RG 5 E, W. SURVEY NOTES INS'TRUM(NT: TOPCON GPT 3000W TOTAL STATION METHOD USED: FlELO TRAVERSE '111TH ACl\JAL fl(LO MEASUREMENTS ANO ANGL£S WAC 332-130-090 OA TE CF SURVEY: APRIL 2005 BASIS Of BEARING: S 15th STREtT (N SSl~'~W) LUA-XX-XXX-SHPL LNO-XX-XXX CITY Of '1£NTCf,I MCfl ,111!;59 CR M~ I Pe fOUND B!!ASS PIN 1111 CONC. footlD 1/r PIN IN IN PIPE l~TUI. Of S P'UG£T DR ,k f'OUMD PK ANO S>nl<E!I / 0.05' -TH Of UNt s 15TH STREET ~ ---8-. ---------N89'53'4fl"W~1 (M) 410.00' (P) ------8-- CONCR£11:' "' C.o.SE ~ BENSOOI DR S (5/o5) lN=. SHATl\JCI( AV£. 5 N -1732:!2.e-096 AND S ISth S1REET (o+/05) t • lJOO+i7.88*5 ~ • 17J22S.~ El • 85.48' r • 1m2112.02M a-t~M' ---l't---:c-cc..-!O"w--" \ . -·-~ ;:~iJJClll \~~ \ --: -: --: --1_ r,,--- \ I REN SP'tl,1,j-7"1 I 7"llo2loi1"1DDl!o I I I LDT 1 \ \ A : B : ,' : D I '° I~~ LUA-S5-030-:L \ "-\-_J .J _J ~ I ~I g ~ ~ ~ 0 LOT 2 \ ~o -----------------~-i _,, <•1, "' \ , I o ii ,,, i ~ ,---i1 Ul \---------~K.9 --------1 ili I I WA""-"'·'""- ui.\ EX STI!IJC'll.lff[S ' I"" ILl9Sl107Y004 -\\ ,.. "1 TOBEREIIIOl.fil ;: L0T3 "'. ~-• ;.,:;, C ,s• 11 ;, i"5' ---I -~ l , ~ , . r "..::, s,I ,,.,_.. U'. \ _J-GAR-.J I' Lpi 1..,.___ I • •' \/ \''!."'---·\ \ '" .\·/ .... {· 'v ~' ---~ ,,,._,_/----~----'c.n ~ .. -" ,'c·T-~•• ----<> .-·· l,(IUSruf1 ~ 20.0 _ ,-" IJt' ,,......._, • .-~ '"""': ,'jJ::,,, •· ' ' ,• •• a .-Ls'..L/_r--ft,.08 , , 1 , .• • I CT'" -, •, 1 / :/ ,.,, '·· i' 1 _/2~.4,, .. .:.>C/, jS.F.P. i jf ~"' "' . ~ .; LINE TABLE ,,, LINE LENGTH BEARING u 26.78 S00"06'12'\./ L2 23,06 S21'34'26'\./ L3 26.76 S01"36'42'\.I i LEGEND e DECIDUOUS 7R£E TO REMAIN * CONJFER TREE TO ROJAIN ® DEODUOIJS TR££ TO BE REll0\.£D @ CONIFER TRfI TO El£ RCAIO\IW 0 HEDOC tJ < ~ _j §: jifi: TOUMA ENGINEERS PAK SHORT PLAT TOPOGRAPHY AND TREE SURVEY v.[ST VAU.EY ElC[Cl.lTIVE: PAR!( O'MII. BY DATE JOB ND. 66J2 S0J™ 191ST Pl.ACE. SUITE E-102 •l((Nl', WA ll8ll32 DAN T. AUGUST, :2007 950-001-071 PHCNE (425) Z!-1-0MiS fAX {4:z:j) 2!:;1-Qe~ 1---;.;_;.;_;.;__--11-,-,,-,,--..C---j-,,.,,,,,,-------! CHKO. SY SCALE SHEET 1 1 MHT NOTED OF SHORT PLAT NO. --::==:=:c=:,,-CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ~ ISS) SURVEY NOTES INSTRUlri4ENT: TOPCON GPT ::SOOOW TOTAL STATION METI-100 USED: Aa..D 1RA\1£RSE WITH ACl\JAL F'!8.D MEASUREMENTS AND ANGt.£5 WAC 3:52-130-090 DAlE OF SURVEY: APRIL 2005 BASIS OF BEARING: S 15th STREET (N 89"53'4~rw) t'.t.l.,Vl'IUINL> NV. I vuc.;eAct. k-..-..i • • • T SCALE: 1 -~ PORTION OF NW 1/4 OF THE S£ 1/4 OF &C 19. lWN 23 N. RG 5 E, W.I LUA-XX-XXX-SHPL LNO-XX-XXX CHY OF ,iENlON t.t0N ~ CR M!;l'l # 4n FOUN:l BRASS PIN IN o:Jt/C. FOUND 1/2" PIN IN IN !'ff'E IN'TU!. Or S PUGET DR & ootlct!ElE IN C.o.sE \ SE~ ~ S (5/0!>) '!!HER. SHATTUCI< AV£. S ~ -t1J2:t2.&098 Foo.mo l'K »ID Sl!INER ~ ~,;~6-=T (04/0f>) E "-1~7.M+S r 0.05• NORl'H Of" Ul,IE: s 15TH STREET r • ,:.!992112.0200 [L e.Ma / n. mu· I --let-----, N89'53'ffi"W 410.11 (lril) 410.00' (P) 8 =~~ {BASIS CF BEARING) ~ 11-(II) i -i------r--i----, i --- ,,\ : : : ln;/•1 \ I REN SPlll.11•7"11 7'!J.2lll"IDC6 I / I I LOT l 1 ,\ \ A I B I C I JI I i I LUA-95-030-SHPL 0 ',\ ~ 2 w if! ov\\ ~"" I I I ': 11 ___ _ ,1t-__ _l ___ _l_~ __ _l ___ --; i 111 .,,.,:;--\\\~\\r:',-------------------1 ~ 1'-C--- ORl\/[ "' '1, ' Bl-K. 9 1 LUA-94-151-SHPi. --__ \\ ~~ . . 4 ~ic~ \ 0 1~ #9S~ ' 1 10 \ ---_ 1"'1 ,~ I ,__ _ -" r~~v[~ J.:'A~A~ .; \IM • IV ~~--'·""' 2,92.09' N ~ , ~-:l::, ~:\ 173.22 • 118. ) T _ __ _ __ __ )\~,\ ' ~::· w S; LOT 2 ~-~-~ ~ -L:T ~'11"2 ~ -~ :"'1; L ~i~[ - '\ ~j I :i ~ c· ·,.a >OUSE ' ,e I I --\ I 'le ~---·"c....,__ ---1.,, ;j LOT 2 --'--, \ \ -r~?r~Ll ""l srRl 273.41 N89"534SWN 1 :;u 1 0, Y LEGEND ~ EX SSAIH ' EX CA TCI-I BASIN TYPE" r • EX CA TCH BASIN TYPE" 2 • WA'TER VALVE" 1 f7Rc HYDRANT • WA 7cR 1/ET[R • IRRIGATION VALi£ ! WA 7fJ? Bl.OW OFF' [!] m..EPHONE CABINET "" CABLE TV CABINET " GAS VALi£ • GAS "°"" • TEl.£PH(J(,H,: UANHOLE "' POM£R VAULT G UGHT Pat£ ' YARO UGHT • MONITORING HE"LL 9' Prn£S7RIAN PUSH BUTTON POL£ A SIGN ~ nto POST SIGN " TRAFFTC J.JNCTION BOX -o-U71i.JT't' Pot£ ~ GVY POI.£ i:, MAR. BOX ceca ROCKERY -$ MON IN CASE ~ SUR1'"AC£ BRASS MONIJl,IENT )I( PK NAIL O FOUND REBAR &: CAP OR IRON PIP£ --' --EX WAT& UNE --SS --EX SANITARY SEIIER UNE --so--EX Srcmt UNE --c-c-IRON FENCE lo\~\ \ ! 20.0::l :a:. j7Bsq1t ;-. --69.08' it: I U<'A\'U , '\~i, I c1r I PP [,F'.]V! 1 _ , , • r---1 1--r I A I ' ' DRJV" ',O ;I I \" -,; ,\ ... -----co :-~ I ~ \ -:$) ,.;:~ LINE TABLE · ' ;f \ '\ LINE LENGTH BEARING :1) ':- Ll 26.78 S00"06'l2'V (j L2 23.06 S21•34'26'V > L3 26,76 S01'36'42"w' PAK SHORT PLAT [g TOUlrlA ENGINEERS UTILITIES PLAN WEST VALLEY EXECUTIVE PARK O'M-1. BY DATE JOO NO. 6632 SOUTH 191ST Pi.AtE. SJllE E-102 •l<D!T, WA 98032 OAN T AUGUST, 2007 950-001-071 PI-ICtE {42!) 251-06$5 FAX (42:5) 251-0!52:5 CHKD. BY SCALE SHEET 1 1 MHT NOTED Of .. -. i; ' ;.J ; --#-... ··· ------4 ' Q / :.:.-/-·A- "' ----\- <() -~'1~/=T,i/ \·-·-- ,_ I , ... , ' .., , I I /. "\,\ n I /. "~ ,, .. }. .c. +- ·,· . .... ·,·. ·,'. <1) - ,, t.._ ,., ........ ..Jt" f'. rn "-a run >'. . \ C.1 I _,. "/, '" "' ·'" ~l . I n , l 'I ,·,·, ,· O• <O G() "' "' ,-• ~ r·' . ' \ \ . \ ·~· ·~ t [ :t, qJ -- ; I : "' ,., . ' DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM January 26, 2011 Bonnie Walton, City Clerk's Office Carrie K. Olson, Plan Review x7235 W UNG SHORT PLAT LUAOS-002-SHPL Attached please find two sets of the above-referenced original Mylar and three paper copies of the Mylar for recording with King County. The recording instructions in order are as follows: 1. Record the short plat Mylar. 2. Request King County to return a copy of the executed Mylar to us for our records. Please have the Courier take these documents via 8-hour service. A check in the mount of $15.81 made out to Champion Couriers is attached. According to Finance, the King County recording fees for this and all subsequent plat recordings should be charged to account #000000.007.559.60.49.003. Please call me if you have any questions. Thank you. Cc: Kayren Kittrick (Notice of Recording) Jan Conklin Yellow File i:\planreview\colson\.shortplats 2011 \ung shpl lOm clerkrecord new fonnatdoc COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: M E M O R A N D U M January 25, 2011 Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Department Carrie Olson, Plan Review CV UNG SHORT PLAT -LUAOS-002-SHPL The Department of Community and Economic Development has reviewed and recommended approval ofthe UNG Short Plat. Requirements and conditions have been fulfilled and fees paid. Two original Mylar are attached and are submitted for your review and signature. Please return mylars to me for recording. Thank you. cc: Yellow File \\l:\PlanReview\COLSON\Shortplats 2011\UNG SHPL 09m ZimSign New Format.doc DATE: TO: ROUTE TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM November 15, 2010 Jan Illian, Plan Review Kayren Kittrick, Plan Review Carrie Olson, Plan Review CV UNG SHORT PLAT LUAOS-002-SHPL Attached is the most recent version of the above-referenced short plat. If all review concerns have been addressed, please sign below or return your comments as needed. Thanks. Attachment included: • Short Plat drawings Also provide the following information requested by Gregg Zimmermen as requirement of project closeout and signing of short plat mylars. Status Of: Acceg:ted Related NA y Project #s Comments 7 As¥Builts y Cost Data Inventory y Bill of Sale y Easements y (\.Vatcr, Sewer, Utilities, Hydrant, etc.) Deed of Dedication Square Footage: y Restrictive Covenants y Maintenance Rond Release Permit Bond y Comments: ~ \.\f:y; d.i.C:..~ 4*<>-<.,k,,l. Approval: ~'f!t· £ ~1ttr'1<P K •r n K1ttnck Cc: Yellow File l:\PlanRevicw\COLSON\Shortplats 2010\UNG SHPL 07m PR~TS ReviewStart.doc Ung Short Plat Administrative Decision Appeal LUA-08-002 November 9, 2010 Page 10 DECISION: The decision below is reversed and the waiver is granted. ORDERED THIS 9"'day ofNovember 2010 FRED J. K.AUFM HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 9"' day of November 2010 to the parties ofrecord: PakS. Ung Neil Watts 19312 47" Ave NE Lake Forest Park, WA 98155 Development Services Dir. City of Renton Mr. James Nelson 132 NW 131 st Street Seattle, WA 98177 TRANSMITTED THIS 9'" day of November 2010 to the following: Mayor Denis Law Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrator Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Jennifer Henning, Development Services Stacy Tucker, Development Services Renton Reporter Dave Pargas, Fire Larry Meckling, Building Official Planning Commission Transportation Division Utilities Division Neil Watts, Development Services Janet Conklin, Development Services Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section lOOGofthe City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., November 23, 2010. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., November 23, 2010. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. • Ung Short Plat Administrative Decision Appeal LUA-08-002 November 9, 2010 Page 9 in future street improvement costs (along the property frontage) unless redevelopment occurs that will generate more traffic trips than what was occurring at the property at the time of the payment of the fee in lieu of installation of street improvements. (Ord. 5170, 12-5- 2005) CONCLUSIONS: I. The appellant has the burden of demonstrating that the decision of the City Official was either in error, or was otherwise contrary to law or constitutional provisions, or was arbitrary and capricious (Section 4-8- 11 O(E)(7)(b ). The appellant has demonstrated that the action of the City should be modified or reversed. The decision is reversed. 2. Arbitrary and capricious action has been defined as willful and unreasoning action in disregard of the facts and circumstances. A decision, when exercised honestly and upon due consideration of the facts and circumstances, is not arbitrary or capricious (Northern Pacific Transport Co. v Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission, 69 Wn. 2d 472, 478 (1966). 3. An action is likewise clearly erroneous when, although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing body, on the entire evidence, is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed. (Ancheta v Daly, 77 Wn. 2d 255, 259 (1969). An appellant body should not necessarily substitute its judgment for the underlying agency with expertise in a matter unless appropriate. 4. There appear to be two different code provisions that apply to the installation of street improvements. There are the waiver provisions cited in Finding 13 and there are the "fee in lieu" provisions cited in Finding 14. The "fee in lieu" provisions are discussed under the "Deferral" provisions. "Deferral" is a separate method of avoiding the need to install improvements as part of the development permitting process. It appears that the appellant sought a waiver and not a deferral. It appears that a waiver should have either been granted or denied based on the improvements or lack thereof in the immediate vicinity. The record is not clear regarding the manner in which a request for a waiver was shuttled to a deferral where fee in lieu of improvements came about. The appellant was entitled to a review of whether a waiver was appropriate or not. 5. The record shows that there are no similar improvements anywhere in the area of subject site. The record appears to support a conclusion that no such improvements would be required or installed within the next ten years in this location. There do not appear to be any adverse health or safety issues. It appears a waiver would be appropriate. Whether a fee in lieu is appropriate comes down to whether a deferral was appropriately considered. The record does not support converting the appellant's request for a waiver to a deferral. The outcome, requiring a fee in lieu, would seem to have had the effect of converting a request for a waiver to one where a deferral was considered and approved with the fee proposed by the Director. 6. Under the circumstances, the appellant appears to be entitled to an outright waiver. In that case, the fee in lieu requested of the applicant is incorrect. The appellant should prevail. 7. This office would welcome a clarification of the two procedures, waiver versus deferral, discussed in this decision to avoid inconsistent results in similar cases. Ung Short Plat Administrative Decision Appeal LUA-08-002 November 9, 2010 Page 8 circumstances the requirements of this Chapter may be satisfied with payment of a fee in lieu of required street improvements. b. Authority To Grant and Duration. 1. Application: If the proposed development of the subject property requires approval through a short plat approval described in the subdivision ordinance, a request for payment of a fee in lieu of street improvements will be considered as part of this process under the provisions of this Section. 11. Duration: If granted under a short plat review process, the authorization to pay a fee in lieu of street improvements is binding on the City for all development permits issued for that short plat approval under the building code within five (5) years of the granting of the request for payment of a fee in lieu of street improvements. c. Standards: The City will not accept the applicant's proposed payment of a fee in lieu of street improvements if the Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator or bis/her designee determines that it is in the City's interest that the street improvements be installed abutting the subject property, taking into account such factors as the pedestrian safety impacts that result from the development. The City may accept payment of a fee in lieu instead of requiring installation of street improvements in the following circumstances: 1. There are no similar improvements in the vicinity and there is no likelihood that the improvements will be needed or · required in the next five (5) years; or 11. Installation of the required improvement would require substantial off-site roadway modifications; or 111. The Public Works Administrator or his/her designee determines that installation of the required improvement would result in a safety hazard; or (Ord. 5450, 3-2-2009) 1v. Other unusual circumstances preclude the construction of the improvements as required. d. Amount of Payment of Fee in Lieu of Street Improvements. In each instance where the City approves a proposed fee-in-lieu under the provisions of this Section, the amount of the fee-in-lieu shall be one hundred percent ( I 00%) of the then-estimated cost of constructing the street improvements that would otherwise be required under this Chapter, based on information compiled and kept current by the Public Works Department on the cost of street improvement construction. (Ord. 5450, 3-2-2009) e. Use of Funds. In each instance where the City accepts payment of a fee in lieu of installing a street improvement under the provisions of this Section, the City shall deposit those funds into a reserve account and expend the funds collected within five (5) years of the date collected to fund other pedestrian safety improvements in the City. f. No Further Obligation from the Property. In each instance where the City accepts payment of a fee in lieu of installing street improvements, the subject property will not be subject to participation • Ung Short Plat Administrative Decision Appeal LUA-08-002 November 9, 2010 Page 7 10. The appellant also inquired about the amount of the fee. The appellant had submitted another request regarding this property in September, 2008. The fees calculated at that time for both Shattuck and Davis were $13,072.00. The Director noted that fees are based on current costs as calculated by the City. The basis costs have increased resulting in a larger fee. It is unclear why the appellant did not act at that time and submitted a new request. 11. The Director indicated that the fees might be applied to areas that need improvements if they are not needed in this location. 12. A review of the area shows few if any similar improvements in the general area and none in the immediately vicinity. 13. The provisions for a waiver are found in Section 4.9-250C: C W AIYER PROCEDURES: 1. Authority for Waiver, General: (Reserved) 2. Authority for Waiver of Street Improvements: The Community and Economic Development Administrator or his/her designee may grant waiver of the installation of street improvements subject to the determination that there is reasonable justification for such waiver. (Ord. 5156, 9-26-2005; Ord. 5450, 3- 2-2009) 3. Application and Fee: Any application for such a waiver shall specify in detail the reason for such requested waiver and may contain such evidence including photographs, maps, and surveys as may be pertinent thereto. The application fee shall be as specified in RMC 4-1-170, Land Use Review Fees. 4. Decision Criteria, General: (Reserved) 5. Decision Criteria for Waivers of Street Improvements: Reasonable justification shall include but not be limited to the following: a. Required street improvements will alter an existing wetlands or stream, or have a negative impact on a shoreline's area. b. Existing steep topography would make required street improvements infeasible. c. Required street improvements would have a negative impact on other properties, such as restricting available access. d. There are no similar improvements in the vicinity and there is little likelihood that the improvements will be needed or required in the next ten (10) years. e. In no case shall a waiver be granted unless it is shown that there will be no detrimental effect on the public health, safety or welfare if the improvements are not installed, and that the improvements are not needed for current or future development. (Ord. 5137, 4-25-2005) 14. The provisions governing paying a fee in lieu of installing improvements is found in Section 4-9-060C9: 9. Fee in Lieu of Required Street Improvements: a. General. The provisions of this Section establish under what Ung Short Plat Administrative Decision Appeal LUA-08-002 November 9, 2010 Page 6 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: I. The appellant, Pak S. Ung, filed an appeal of a decision denying a waiver of the requirement to install street improvements or pay a fee in lieu of installing those improvements. 2. The appellant owns property located at 1517 Shattuck Avenue South in the City of Renton. The parcel is what is called a through-lot which means it runs between two streets and has frontage along both of those streets. In this case the second frontage is located along Davis. 3. The appellant sought to subdivide the subject site into three (3) lots. An existing home is located along Shattuck Avenue S. The second lot would be an interior lot and would be interior to both Shattuck and Davis. The third lot would be located on Davis Avenue and would have frontage along that street. As proposed, both of the new lots would take their access from Davis. 4. The City's regulations require that when property is platted, the underlying applicant must make street improvements along the adjacent frontage. Those improvements include curb, gutter and sidewalks. In this case, the appellant would be required to improve both the frontage along Shattuck as well as the frontage along Davis since the plat has frontage along both of those streets. 5. The frontage along Shattuck is approximately 75 feet long. The frontage along Davis is 76.85 feet. 6. The Director reviewed the request in conjunction with other City staff. The Director determined that the waiver could be granted for Shattuck noting "Due to the minimal impact of one additional lot, the absence of similar improvements in the vicinity, the waiver is hereby granted as requested for Shattuck Avenue south." The Director noted that two lots would be accessed from Davis and that there would be additional impacts on Davis and that "a waiver cannot be approved for Davis Avenue South." The Director noted "a fee-in-lieu is approved for 76.85 feet of frontage on Davis Avenue South, which for payment in 2010 will be $11,833.36." The Director concludes that either the improvements be completed or the fee-in-lieu be paid prior to recording the short plat. 7. The appellant referred to a nearby property where that property's owner was developing a short plat and the improvements were waived and no fee was required. 8. The Director noted that the City has developed a policy for smaller short plats where an existing home is already located on the property that will be short platted. They have determined that one additional home, generally interior to the frontage creates minimal impact. The frontage where a home is already located is treated as exempt and frontage improvements are generally waived if there are no other nearby frontage improvements. That explains the quoted language above where the Director waived the improvements along Shattuck. 9. The Director noted that the City used the policy evenhandedly and granted both the appellant and the other property owner a waiver along one frontage. The Director noted that the appellant's property has two frontages. An outright waiver was granted for Shattuck but that a second waiver for the second frontage was inappropriate. The waiver for the second frontage would be granted by the City only if the appellant paid a fee in lieu. Ung Short Plat Administrative uecision Appeal LUA-08-002 November 9, 2010 Page 5 have some significant fee impacts to the Transportation group to make this type of waiver. They have to look at precedence, they do not want to be arbitrary and capricious, whatever is done for these individuals even though it comes up to a different answer that one person pays zero and the other pays $11,000.00 they were really granted similar waivers for the street frontage, for the lot that has an existing house they did waive the street improvements for that. It would be a significant change for the Public Works Department in any timeframe, but even more so now with the economic climate they are in as well. That was our decision, they feel that the waiver procedures were set up to be largely discretionary on the City's part and the default condition was to build the improvements and they have been even stronger in that place once we set up a Fee-In-Lieu-Of, that is a smarter way for the whole community to be using that financial resource and in most cases even at the $11,000.00 it probably is less expensive than it would be to try and get an engineer to design this limited improvement and for a contractor to come out and built this small level improvement. They do recognize that it is a high number, the average costs have gone up considerably. These numbers are very comparable to what other cities both in the region and on a national basis are using. These are the norm for unit costs for curb, gutter and sidewalk. The Examiner stated that in the two years since the original estimate of $13,000.00 for both streets, prices have gone up substantially. Mr. Watts stated in retrospect the $13,000.00 was very low, they had some CIP projects in 2007 that the unit costs being used for curb, gutter and sidewalk were probably artificially low. The contractors were making their money on other items, but those were what was used to create those numbers. The numbers here were considerably lower than what other jurisdictions were using. Once they moved to 2009, the 2008 numbers came more toward the industry standard, when we moved to 20 IO they decided not to escalate those numbers and kept with the same numbers that we had for the prior year. Mr. Ung stated that the money he spent on developing the two lots, he is not making any money whatsoever, and he is just trying to get his money back. The cost to develop those two lots it does not make sense for me to go and pay this $11,000.00 to complete the project, it just is not there. There is not much difference between one lot and two lots and there is no detrimental effect to the vicinity. The Examiner stated that there is twice the traffic, each time you add another house you add approximately I 0 vehicle trips per day. One house would be 10, two houses would be 20 etc., again these are approximate numbers. Mr. Ung stated that he was about to lost the property. The Examiner stated that he could sympathize with that, but unfortunately his is still bound by the Code as Mr. Watts described. I understand that you were told that this department's intent was to support your request but it had to go through a review or criteria process with other departments or divisions also to determine what their needs were at the same time. Mr. Ung stated that he was told the waiver would be granted. He was told the wrong story at the wrong time. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:44 am. • Ung Short Plat Administrative Decision Appeal LUA-08-002 November 9, 2010 Page 4 of economic challenges as well and was reluctant to let go of these perceived fees. After a great deal of discussion, trying to be equitable not only with these projects, but other projects that are out there, these are not the only small short plats waiting to hopefully be built, they agreed that they would have another decision criteria for waiver of street improvements for lots that already had a house built on them, one could argue that there was no really reasonable nexus that that lot was wasn't creating additional traffic, that lot was not creating additional pedestrians and that they felt justified that they could waive the frontage improvements for the lot that had an existing house. For Mr. Turalba that was the only lot, the new lot was an interior lot behind the existing house, so the waiver for the one street with the existing frontage house was basically all they had to pay. They got a total waiver. In Mr. Ung's case, he received a similar waiver for the existing parcel on Shattuck that has a house already, they waived that improvement but they are still going to require it and that is the decision they made for the new parcel on Davis. Unfortunately, they did not check to see what address was current for Mr. Ung and the old address was listed on the Board of Public Works files and that was the address that was used, the letter was returned to the City and at some point following that, Mr. Watts had a discussion with Mr. Ung at the front counter, at which time he gave Mr. Ung a copy of the letter, he still felt the number was too high, especially when he thought that half of $13,000.00 does not equal $11,000.00, he could understand that concern. Rather than taking the letter he handed it back to me and asked Mr. Watts to see ifhe could get the fee reduced to have of the $11,000.00. He agreed to talk to the various Public Works Department people, after that discussion there was no equitable way of splitting this fee or making it less that what it is. A new letter was issued, establishing a new appeal date because they had gone past the original appeal date on the first letter to allow Mr. Ung the opportunity to appeal the decision if he so elected and proceeded on that basis. He characterized this neighborhood pretty much as the pictures show, most right-of-ways are substandard in width anywhere from 30-feet to 45-feet, standards are 50-55 feet. Generally just pavement somewhere in the neighborhood of 18-feet to 24-feet is pretty wide for this neighborhood, not many sidewalks; however projects that have been built in the neighborhood have built sidewalks. There is a project on 15 1 h a little north of this site that recently built sidewalks, there is a larger plat two to three blocks to the south built about IO years ago that built substantial curb, gutter and sidewalk. There is a City project near the park to the east of this site that built some street improvements as part of the project. There have been some level of street improvements in the area but certainly nothing on the blocks that are part of the discussion today, Mr. Ung and Mr. Turalba's properties. Those blocks are just paved, there is no curb and gutter, just shoulders that people park on. However, the topography is fairly flat, there is no strong physical reason why those improvements couldn't be built. There is no topography or critical areas that preclude building those improvements. How the criteria is applied, there certainly is some room for it and they exhibited some flexibility in evolution just in approving these two waivers, they recognize that the economics of development, particularly small short plats has changed radically since 2008 and that it's very difficult for these projects to proceed. Mr. Watts and the City want Mr. Ung to be successful in moving this project into a development mode and recognize that the added costs are significant today and they make a big difference whether these projects go forward or people wind up losing their property and their investment in the community. He apologized that they could not get to a better answer, for the length oftime some of the internal negotiations went on with this and some things that an applicant does not see in terms of how they have to look at how a decision affects other properties, there have been similar type of situations they have not moved forward with waivers and to recognize that there are a dozen or so similar projects sitting out there so it does Ung Short Plat Administrative Decision Appeal LUA-08-002 November 9, 2010 Page 3 In-Lieu-Of, that was created approximately 8-9 years ago, other cities including Kirkland had that and it was believed to be a reasonable alternative to having people build these small pieces of sidewalk that are not connected at this point. The Examiner stated that a Fee-In-Lieu is in place ofa deferral, a waiver would be outright, and it does not have to be done. Mr. Watts stated that was correct, a waiver has been used over the years to concede that in certain situations street improvements are not going to be built. Those are almost exclusively until these two recent short plats have been used for cases where it physically is not going to be built either due to steep topography, wetlands, creeks, right-of-way that clearly was not going to connect to anything because ifran into 1-405, it was only used for those. Prior to having the Fee-In-Lieu-Of they would do deferrals with a restrictive covenant and a no protest agreement to future LID's which is a very awkward feature to have on a title, moving to the Fee-In- Lieu-Of provided people the option of installing the improvements themselves or paying a fee in lieu that the City would use for similar type improvements somewhere in the City. A Fee-In-Lieu-Of is suggested every year, it is based on the City's average cost in the CIP projects for building, curb and gutter. There are many CIP projects that have unit costs for that, this is not a land use fee so it is not vested at time of application, it is a fee that is in place at the date it is paid. In 2008 when they had the original request, the costs the prior year were considerably lower for curb, gutter and sidewalk than they have been in recent years. That is why, if the fee had been paid in 2008 the total fee would have been $13,000.00 unfortunately for those two streets today, they come closer to $23,000.00 based on what the Fee-In-Lieu-Of is at this time frame. This is a 3-lot, thru lot short plat, there is an existing house on Shattuck and two new lots are created with streets on either side of the lots. There is a double blind that in one case there is a very small short plat that is very hard to pick up these kind of costs and then has the bind of having two street frontages for a very limited number of lots. At the same time the Fee-In-Lieu-Of discussion was going on with Council, he also brought a proposal to them to basically exempt short plats of four lots of or less. Many cities, including Seattle, do that recognizing that it is very expensive and is very difficult to recover the costs when only two or three new homes are being built. Council opted to not approve that blanket waiver and wanted each of these to continue to have a default condition that they would either build the improvements or pay the fee-in-lieu-of, and that the City would continue to look at it on an individual case to see if they warranted waivers. Until these two short plats came in they have been following that criteria for waivers only in situations where it was physically unlikely that improvements could be built without major retaining walls. They have had the circumstances that are in this industry, these are both very representative projects of that, by the time you look at what the market is going to pay for houses today versus all the costs of building the houses including considerable City costs, connection charges, traffic mitigation fees, park mitigation fees, fire mitigation fees, there is a lot of costs that piling on another $23,000.00 to a project that is only addition two new building lots seems somewhat high. Mr. Ung and Mr. Turalba were both directed to go in this direction, to request the waivers. These requests are now reviewed by the Public Works Department, which is now a separate department than where Mr. Watts is located. He advised Jan that he personally would be supportive and make a best faith effort to get those departments to agree to that, that information was poorly communicated with Mr. Ung to be a certainty versus that they would support it but still had to go through the process and see what other parts of the City would agree to. Originally the Public Works Department, like everybody else in City Government is facing a number Ung Short Plat Administrative Decision Appeal LUA-08-002 November 9, 2010 Page 2 stated that he should be granted the waiver as well. The neighborhood would not look good if a sidewalk was installed in this one location. It could be a tripping hazard to pedestrians passing by. When the extension of this project was granted, Jan Illian told him that the requirement would be waived. He was very happy to hear that news, he was waiting for an official letter from the City stating that fact. For economic development, the City of Renton should be helping projects moving through the system. The project was waived due to the economic conditions, the City was trying to put projects through so the development could continue. Right now he does not have the money for the "pay-in-lieu" frontage improvements. He felt that he was not treated right by the City. The Examiner stated that those issues could be brought to the Mayor or the City Council for discussions. Mr. Ung had a copy of the September 30, 2010 letter from Mr. Neil Watts wherein the waiver for Shattuck was granted; however, the waiver for the property fronting on Davis was denied. In the letter of September 5, 2008 the fee-in-lieu-of due the City was listed at $13,072.00 for both properties, in 2010 the fee-in-lieu-of due the City for the Davis property only was $11,833.36. That did not seem possible to have it be so much more for just one parcel. Seven photographs were submitted as exhibits, the Examiner described each photograph and labeled them A- G. Also presented was a letter dated September 2, 2010 wherein the Turalba Short Plat waiver was granted. James Nelson, 132 NW 131" Street, Seattle 98177 stated that he has been in real estate for 28 years in north Seattle and has been involved with a lot of plats around the area. The issue here is that Pak was told that the fees would be waived, Mr. Watts has not returned his phone calls and the inability to connect with the City of Renton in a timely fashion has caused havoc in not being able to address these issues. The Examiner stated that those issues should be taken up with the Mayor or City Council, today the facts of the requested waiver and whether or not it was appropriately denied. Neil Watts, Development Services Director stated that he would try to fill in some of the gaps. The authority for waivers is in Renton Municipal Code, Section 4-9-250c which is Waiver Procedures. This has largely been in place for about 17 years, there are two key items here: the way this is written, the authority for waiver of street improvements is with the Community and Economic Development Administrator or his designee, that would be Mr. Watts, and the key word "may" grant. This is a discretionary decision, not a typical land use decision, building decision where you "shall" provide you meet certain conditions. This is clearly set up as a discretionary decision to be made by the City. It then proceeds to list out some decision criteria that can be used and then the key part of this, that allowed the partial waiver that was granted on this one is "reasonable justification shall include but not be limited to" it allowed them to bring in some additional criteria that are not listed. The last piece is five criteria and in the last criteria is the only place where the term "shall" comes up. In his mind, as the author of most of this language, the only effective appeals should be something where they have been clearly arbitrary and capricious, which he hoped they had not been, or in a case where somebody objected to a waiver. The last section "E" says "you shall not issue" under certain conditions, otherwise, this is a discretionary decision on the part of the City. When this provision was originally written, it was with the street improvement standards about 18 years ago, they provided for modifications, deferrals, and waivers. At that time for deferrals they did not have the Fee- ,· ' ·, November 9, 2010 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPELLANT: PakS. Ung 19312 47th Ave NE Lake Forest Park, WA 98155 Ung Short Plat Administrative Decision Appeal LUA-08-002 After reviewing the Appellant's written requests for a hearing and examining available information on file, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The following minutes are a summary of the October 26, 2010 hearing. The legal record is recorded on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday, October 26, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Hearing Examiner's file containing the original appeal letter and notification of this hearin2:. Exhibit No. 3: Seven Photographs (noted A-G) presented by Mr. Ung. Exhibit No. 5: Letter from Kayren Kittrick to Mr. and Mrs. Turalba Granting Waiver Request for Street r~rovements. Parties Present: Mr. Pak S. Ung (Appellant) Mr. James Nelson Neil Watts, Development Services Director Exhibit No. 2: Letter dated 9/30/2010 from Neil Watts to Mr. Ung. Exhibit No. 4: Letter dated 9/5/2008 from Linda Moschetti to Mr. Ung with Fee-In-Lieu-Of Amount of $13,072.00 for both orooerties. Pak S. Ung stated that he is the owner of the property at 1517 Shattuck Ave S. He did take some pictures of the property and those were entered as exhibits. There are no sidewalks in the neighborhood surrounding the property in question. The Turalba project was approved and the waiver was granted. In light of that, Mr. Ung STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on October 15, 2010. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $77.00. ~ :£2?l2db · mda M. Mills Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter Subscribed and sw~rn to me this 15th day October, 2010. Kathy Dalm, Notary Publ&'fortlie State of Washington, Residing in Covingt~n, Washington P. 0. Number: ·C· .r: ,f ,_ (_) ,'> / . "-' ~ r> i !·--' (J f \j ,! ~;:) I\OTICE OF APPEAL HEARING RE~TON HEARING EXAMl:>iER RENTO'I, WASIIINGTON A appeal Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing 1::xammer m the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of Renton City llall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on October 26, 20l0 at 9:00 a.m. to consider the following petitions: Ung Short Plat LUAOS-002, SHPL-A Location: 1517 Shattuck Ave South. Appeal of the denial of a waiver for street frontage improvements on Davis Avenue South for the Ung Short Plat Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the City Clerk's Office, Seventh Floor, City Hall. Renton. All interested persons are invited to be present at the Public Hearing to i:xpress their opinions. Questions should be directed to the Hearing Examiner at 425- 430-6515. Published in the Renton Reporter on October 15, 2010.#422905 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 5495 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE FOR PROPERTIES ADJACENT TO lSS'h AVE NE, 156TH AVE NE AND SE 124TH ST, AND ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF THE CHARGE UPON CONNECTION TO THE FACILITIES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. There is hereby created a Sanitary Sewer Service Special Assessment District for the area served by the White Fence Ranch Sanitary Sewer Extension project in the northeast quadrant of the City of Renton and within King County, which area is more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. A map of the service area is attached as Exhibit "B". The recording of this document is to provide notification of potential connection and interest charges. While this connection charge may be paid at any time, the City does not require payment until such time as the parcel is connected to and, thus, benefiting from the sewer facilities. The property may be sold or in any other way change hands without triggering the requirement, by the City, of payment of the charges associated with this district. SECTION II. Persons connecting to the sanitary sewer facilities in this Special Assessment District, and which properties have not been charged or assessed with all costs of the White Fence Ranch Sanitary Sewer Extension as detailed in this ordinance, shall pay, in addition to the payment of the connection permit fee and in addition to the system development charge, the following additional fees: 1 ORDINANCE NO. 5495 A. Per Unit Charge. New connections of residential units shall pay a fee of $11,021.66 per dwelling unit. SECTION Ill. In addition to the aforestated charges, there shall be a charge of 5.30% per annum added to the Special Assessment District charge. The interest charge shall accrue for no more than ten (10} years from the date this ordinance becomes effective. Interest charges will be simple interest and not compound interest. SECTION JV. This ordinance is effective upon its passage, approval and thirty (30) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 21stdayofSeptember , 2009. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 21st day of September 2009. Denis Law, Mayor Approved as to form: ~ Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: 9/25/2009 (summary) ORD:1582:8/5/09:scr 2 I J ORDINANCE NO. 5495 EXHIBIT A WIDTE FENCE RANCH SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The South 390 feet of the West 200 feet of the Southeast quarter of Section 11, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington; EXCEPT the South 130 feet of the West 75 feet thereof; and EXCEPT that portion lying southerly of the northerly right of way margin of SE 128'h Ave.; TOGETHER WITH that portion of Assessor's Plat of White Fence Ranch, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 65 of Plats, page 6, records of King County, Washington, lying northerly of the northerly right of way margin of SE 128'h Ave and southerly of the southerly right of way line of SE 120th St.; EXCEPT Lots 13 through 20 of Block 4 of said plat. Situate in the Southwest quarter of Section 11, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington. ORDINANCE NO. 5495 I I ,-----, -,_ - - . -n> r--- ~ ~ r--- r--- ~ I I \ w w \ en (J) \ ~I\ r--- I w w > ;;: <t: ~ r---------SE 124TH ST -f---fx -f--w -z -f-- ~ Zr"-._ -. - - --·• :c :c -...J w~x f-I- 0.. lO co --. lO lO -l~r'------_, - ~ 0 a:: ~L/x f--i7i -~ f--0 -0:: f--I II NE 4TH PL ·~ j' I ~ 0 '-- ) I NE 4TH ST SE 128TH ST WHITE FENCH RANCH SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT EXHIBIT"B" SCALE 1 "=300' ' I J ~ L ) CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: August 20, 2008 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Bob Mac Onie, Technical Services Karen McFarland, Technical Services Carrie Olson, Plan Review x7235 UNGSHORTPLATLUA08-002-SHPL Attached is the most recent version of the above-referenced short plat. The following attachments are enclosed for your review: • Short Plat drawings If all review concerns have been addressed, please sign below or return your comments as needed. Thanks. RECEIVED AUG 2 0 2008 CITY OF RENTON UTILITY SYSTEMS ' r .. ~ 'k/~d . . ------.,· . -'----, \ ' ' . .· ' : . : Approval: £c:cc_·· ~,'-'to . ' ;:, . ) ,Jt1{1~ ate: 01i1-I ~'\'~ Robert T Mac Onie, Jr. ><. a en McFarland Cc: Yellow File I:\PlanReview\COLSON\Shortplats 2008\UNG SHPL 0Sm PR-TS ReviewStart.doo DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM June 16, 2008 Jan Conklin, Development Services Carrie K. Olson, Development Services/Plan Review x7235(!,D UNG SHORT PLAT LUA08-002SHPL A copy of the above mentioned short plat is attached for your information. If you have comments or changes in addressing, please let me know. \\I:\PlanReviewlCOLSON\Shonplats 2008\UNG SHPL 03m JanC.doc • DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM June 16, 2Mft----Y-~/iJ.., ~ J:eH11ife1 Henning, Plttlttl.iRg EAnEIF@a) /6Wl r~ ~Is ~SJ-()b;i.5 Carrie Olson, Plan Review CO UNG SHORT PLAT LUA08-002SHPL Attached is the LUA folder for the short plat. We are in the final review stage ofrecording this short plat. If you find any short plat requirements that have not been properly addressed, please let me know. Please return comments and folder to me by Friday, May 23, 2008, so I can proceed to final recording. Thanks. • Mitigation Fees Traffic and Fire for 2 lots in the amount of $2,411.50 will be paid prior to recording. Demo Permit BOSO 168 is not final ed. !) . -1} kvv., ~ t}rtt-11-l'f Approval: Y \ Jennifer Henning, Planning Cc: Yellow File !:\PlanReview\COLSON\Shortplats 2008\UNO SHPL 02m PIBMingReview.doc , Date: Printed: 11-17-2010 Payment Made: TY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUAOS-002 Receipt Number: R1005099 Total Payment: 11/17/2010 02:34 PM 2,411.50 Payee: JAMES NELSON #1126 Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 5045 304.000000.009.345 Fire Mitigation-SFR 5050 305.000000.016.344 Traffic Mitigation Fee 976.00 1,435.50 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check #1126 2,411.50 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due ------------------------ 3021 303.000000.020.345 Park Mitigation Fee .00 5006 000.000000.007.345 Annexation Fees .00 5007 000.000000.011.345 Appeals/Waivers .oo 5008 000.000000.007.345 Binding Site/Short Plat .00 5009 000.000000.007.345 Conditional Use Fees .00 5010 000.000000.007.345 Environmental Review .oo 5011 000.000000.007.345 Prelim/Tentative Plat .00 5012 000.000000.007.345 Final Plat . 00 5013 000.000000.007.345 PUD .00 5014 000.000000.007.345 Grading & Filling Fees .oo 5015 000.000000.007.345 Lot Line Adjustment .00 5016 000.000000.007.345 Mobile Home Parks .00 5017 000.000000.007.345 Rezone .oo 5018 000.000000.007.345 Routine Vegetation Mgmt .00 5019 000.000000.007.345 Shoreline Subst Dev .00 5020 000.000000.007.345 Site Plan Approval .00 5021 000.000000.007.345 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence .00 5022 000.000000.007.345 Variance Fees .oo 5024 000.000000.007.345 Conditional Approval Fee .00 5036 000.000000.007.345 Comprehensive Plan Amend .00 5045 304.000000.009.345 Fire Mitigation-SFR .oo 5050 305.000000.016.344 Traffic Mitigation Fee .00 5909 000.000000.002.341 Booklets/EIS/Copies .00 5941 000.000000.007.341 Maps (Taxable) . 00 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 DO NOT USE -USE 3954 .00 5955 000.05.519.90.42.l Postage .00 5998 000.000000.000.231 Tax .00 Printed: 11-15-20 I 0 Payment Made: TY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Water Service Permit RECEIPT Permit#: W080257 10/29/2008 02:42 PM Receipt Number: Total Payment: 4,496.00 Payee: PAK S UNG #9571 Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description 4056 425.000000.018.388 Spec Util Connect Water 4059 405.000000.018.388 Misc. Water Installation Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check #9571 4,496.00 Account Balances Amount 2,236.00 2,260.00 Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 4021 405.000000.018.343 Meter Processing Fee 4056 425.000000.018.388 Spec Util Connect Water 4059 405.000000.018.388 Misc. Water Installation 4068 405.000000.000.237 Hydrant Deposit Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 R0805632 Printed: 11-15-2010 Payment Made: TY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Water Service Permit RECEIPT Permit#: W080258 10/29/2008 02:42 PM Receipt Number: Total Payment: 4,496.00 Payee: PAK S UNG #9571 Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description 4056 425.000000.018.388 Spec Util Connect Water 4059 405.000000.018.388 Misc. Water Installation Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check #9571 4,496.00 Account Balances Amount 2,236.00 2,260.00 Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 4021 405.000000.018.343 Meter Processing Fee 4056 425.000000.018.388 Spec Util Connect Water 4059 405.000000.018.388 Misc. water Installation 4068 405.000000.000.237 Hydrant Deposit Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 R0805632 " Printed: 11-15-2010 Payment Made: TY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Sidesewer Permit RECEIPT Permit#: SS080249 Receipt Number: Total Payment: 10129/2008 02:36 PM 2,741.00 Payee: PAK S UNG #9571 Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 3954 650.000000.000.237 4040 426.000000.018.388 4044 406.000000.018.322 .............................. ·1 ............... . Special Deposits f/,· , •' . 1,000.00 Spec Util Connect Sewer 1,591.00 Sewer Permit 150.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check #9571 2,741.00 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3954 650.000000.000.237 Special Deposits 4040 426.000000.018.388 Spec Util Connect Sewer 4044 406.000000.018.322 Sewer Permit 4050 000.000000.007.322 Right-of-way Constructn Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 R0805632 .... -. Printed: 11-15-20 I 0 Payment Made: __ TY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Sidesewer Permit RECEIPT Permit#: SS080250 Receipt Number: Total Payment: 10/29/2008 02:39 PM 1,741.00 Payee: PAK S UNG #9571 Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description 4040 426.000000.018.388 Spec Util Connect Sewer 4044 406.000000.018.322 Sewer Permit Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check #9571 1,741.00 Account Balances Amount 1,591.00 150.00 Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3954 650.000000.000.237 Special Deposits 4040 426.000000.018.388 Spec Util Connect Sewer 4044 406.000000.018.322 Sewer Permit 4050 000.000000.007.322 Right-of-way Constructn Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 R0805632 Printed: 11-15-2010 Payment Made: --TY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Storm Permit RECEIPT Permit#: SW08142 Receipt Number: Total Payment: 10/29/2008 02:39 PM 1,162.00 Payee: PAK S UNG #9571 Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description 4061 407.000000.018.322 Storm Water Permits 4069 427.000000.018.388 Spec Util Connect Stormw Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check #9571 1,162.00 Account Balances Amount 150.00 1,012.00 Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 4050 000.000000.007.322 Right-of-way Constructn 4061 407.000000.018.322 Storm Water Permits 4069 427.000000.018.388 Spec Util Connect Stormw Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 .00 .00 .00 R0805632 Printed: 11-15-20 I 0 Payment Made: --TY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Storm Permit RECEIPT Permit#: SW08143 Receipt Number: Total Payment: 10/29/2008 02:42 PM 1,162.00 Payee: PAK S UNG #9571 Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description 4061 407.000000.018.322 Storm Water Permits 4069 427.000000.018.388 Spec Util Connect Stormw Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check #9571 1,162.00 Account Balances Amount 150.00 1,012.00 Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 4050 ooo.ooooo0.007.322 Right-of-way Constructn 4061 407.000000.018.322 Storm Water Permits 4069 427.000000.018.388 Spec Util Connect Stormw Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 .00 .00 .00 R0805632 Printed: 11-15-2010 Payment Made: TY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Storm Permit RECEIPT Permit#: SW08144 10/29/2008 02:42 PM Receipt Number: Total Payment: 1,162.00 Payee: PAK S UNG #9571 Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description 4061 407.000000.018.322 Storm Water Permits 4069 427.000000.018.388 Spec Util Connect Stormw Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check #9571 1,162.00 Account Balances Amount 150.00 1,012.00 Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 4050 000.000000.007.322 Right-of-way Constructn 4061 407.000000.018.322 Storm Water Permits 4069 427.000000.018.388 Spec Util Connect Stormw Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 .00 .00 .00 R0805632 Denis Law r City of ' -----~M:a:yo:, ___ ................. • .J_~ll!Dll November 16, 2010 Pak Ung 1222 N 185th St, Suite 102 Seattle WA 98133 SUBJECT: Dear Mr. Ung: Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator UNG SHORT PLAT LUAOS-002-SHPL The review submittal on the above-mentioned short plat has been completed and the following comments have been returned. SHORT PLAT REVIEW COMMENTS: (These items are required to be completed prior to recording of the short plat.) 1. Pay Transportation and Fire Mitigation Fees in the amount of $2,411.50 under LUA08-002 made payable to the City of Renton. These fees may be paid at the Customer Services Counter on the 6th floor of Renton City Hall. When the above items are completed, you may submit the signed and notarized short plat mylar (one original mylar and one copy (on mylar) of each sheet) along with a check in the amount of $15.81 (current courier fee) made out to Champion Couriers. Should you need to discuss any portion of this letter please contact me at (425) 430-7235. Sincerely, Carrie K. Olson Development Services, Plan Review FAXED TO: Dan Touma, Touma Engineers: 425-251-0625 Cc: Yellow File l:\PlanReview\COLSON\Shortplats 201 O\UNG SHPL 08L RequestMylarStop.doc Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM August 27, 2008 Carrie Olson Karen McFarland, x7209~rf'-------- Ung Short Plat, LUA-08-002-SHPL Format and Legal Description Review Technical Services staff have reviewed the above referenced short plat submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant: None. Information needed for final short plat approval includes the following: An apostrophe is missing after the word "OWNER" in the OWNERS' DECLARATION block. Note the plat information for the properties to the north and south of the subject parcel on the short plat drawing. The plat information should include the plat name as well as the plat' s volume and page numbers. Specifically please note that Lot 6 is misidentified. Also, the information for Lot 3 is incomplete. Finally, there are typographical errors in the plat information provided. Please remove the extraneous "OF" 's. L:\LND-20 • Short Plats\0514\RV080820.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Ung Short Plat, LUA 08-002, SHPL-A Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED February 19, 2008 H. DECISION: The Ung Short Plat, File No. LUA 08-002, SHPL-A, is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits and remove the deck on the existing house prior to recording the short plat. Page 7 2. The applicant shall submit to the Development Services project manager a revised, detailed landscape plan prior to the issuance of any building permit applications. All landscaping shall be installed prior to the issuance of occupancy for the buildings. 3. The applicant shall submit to the Development Services project manager a revised retention plan prior to the issuance of any utility construction permits. The applicant must either preserve additional trees, or plant 24 caliper inches of replacement trees. Each tree must be a 2-inch minimum caliper, and all landscaping shall be installed prior to final inspection. 4. The applicant shall pay a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net new average daily trip f attributed to the two new lots. Fees are to be paid prior to recording of the short plat. 7/ 7, 7,; 'I;). =-i/tl· s.,:6 2 .,' 5. The applicant shall submit to the Development Services project manager a revised short plat plan without a pipestem for Lot 2. Instead, access to the interior lot shall be an access easement across Lot 3. Vehicular access to both lots 2 and 3 shall be via this shared private access easement. The redrawn short plat shall be submitted prior to the issuance of utility construction permits. The front yard for proposed Lot 1 shall face east facing toward Shattuck Avenuejthe existing house does conform). The front yard for Lot 2 would face north. and the front yard for Lot 3 would face west, toward Davis Avenue South. This shall be noted on the face of the short plat map. 7. The applicant shall pay a Fire Mitiijation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family lot prior to the recording of the short plat. 1/Cf?(p 8. The project shall be required to comply with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements as outlined in Volume II of the current edition of the Stormwater Management Manual. '}. i+( (, 50 DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: TRANSMITTED this 19111 day of February, 2008 to the Applicant/Owner/Contact: Owner: Pak and Dara Ung Contact: Dan Touma, Touma Engineers 1222 N. 1851h Street, Suite 102 6632 S.191 51 Place E·102 Seattle, WA 98133 Kent, WA 98032 TRANSMITTED this 191h day of February, 2008 to the Parties of Record· Kraig Carrere John G. DuBois Irene Robbins 1530 Davis Ave. S. PO Box 1187 17207 NE ih Place Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98057-1187 Bellevue, WA 98008 TRANSMITTED this 19rn day of February, 2008 to the following: Larry Meckling, Building Officlal Fire Marshal Neil Watts, Development Services Director Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Jan Conklin Carrie Olson Renton Reporter 2/2.o)o~ I I decision date • , I wtdi:4 November 9, 2010 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER crry OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPELLANT: NOV 1 0 2010 PakS. Ung 19312 47ili Ave NE Lake Forest Park, WA 9 815 5 RECEIVED Ung Short Plat Administrative Decision Appeal LUA-08-002 After reviewing the Appellant's written requests for a hearing and examining available information on file, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The following minutes are a summary of the October 26, 2010 hearing. The legal record is recorded on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday, October 26, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Hearing Examiner's file containing the angina! appeal letter and notification ohhis hearing. Exhibit No. 3: Seven Photographs (noted A-G) presented by Mr. Ung. Exhibit No. 5: Letter from Kayren Kittrick to Mr. and Mrs. Turalba Granting Waiver Request for Street Improvements. Parties Present: Mr. Pak S. Ung (Appellant) Mr. James Nelson Neil Watts, Development Services Director Exhibit No. 2: Letter dated 9/30/2010 from Neil Watts to Mr. Ung. Exhibit No. 4: Letter dated 9/5/2008 from Linda Moschetti to Mr. Ung with Fee-In-Lieu-Of Amount of$13,072.00 for both properties. Pak S. Ung stated that he is the owner of the property at 1517 Shattuck Ave S. He did take some pictures of the property and those were entered as exhibits. There are no sidewalka in the neighborhood surrounding the property in question. The Turalba project was approved and the waiver was granted. In light of that, Mr. Ung Ung Short Plat Administrative Decision Appeal LUA-08-002 November 9, 2010 Page2 stated that he should be granted the waiver as well. The neighborhood would not look good if a sidewalk was installed in this one location. It could be a tripping hazard to pedestrians passing by. When the extension of this project was granted, Jan Illian told him that the requirement would be waived. He was very happy to hear that news, he was waiting for an official letter from the City stating that fact. For economic development, the City of Renton should be helping projects moving through the system. The project was waived due to the economic conditions, the City was trying to put projects through so the development could continue. Right now he does not have the money for the "pay-in-lieu" frontage improvements. He felt that he was not treated right by the City. The Examiner stated that those issues could be brought to the Mayor or the City Council for discussions. Mr. Ung had a copy of the September 30, 2010 letter from Mr. Neil Watts wherein the waiver for Shattuck was granted; however, the waiver for the property fronting on Davis was denied. In the letter of September 5, 2008 the fee-in-lieu-of due the City was listed at $13,072.00 for both properties, in 2010 the fee-in-lieu-of due the City for the Davis property only was $11,833.36. That did not seem possible to have it be so much more for just one parcel. Seven photographs were submitted as exhibits, the Examiner described each photograph and labeled them A- G. Also presented was a letter dated September 2, 20 IO wherein the Turalba Short Plat waiver was granted. James Nelson, 132 NW 131" Street. Seattle 98177 stated that he has been in real estate for 28 years in north Seattle and has been involved with a lot of plats around the area. The issue here is that Pak was told that the fees would be waived. Mr. Watts has not returned his phone calls and the inability to connect with the City of Renton in a timely fashion has caused havoc in not being able to address these issues. The Examiner stated that those issues should be taken up with the Mayor or City Council, today the facts of the requested waiver and whether or not it was appropriately denied. Neil Watts, Development Services Director stated that he would try to fill in some of the gaps. The authority for waivers is in Renton Municipal Code. Section 4-9-250c which is Waiver Procedures. This has largely been in place for about 17 years. there are two key items here: the way this is written, the authority for waiver of street improvements is with the Community and Economic Development Administrator or his designee, that would be Mr. Watts, and the key word "may" grant. This is a discretionary decision. not a typical land use decision. building decision where you "shall" provide you meet certain conditions. This is clearly set up as a discretionary decision to be made by the City. It then proceeds to list out some decision criteria that can be used and then the key part of this. that allowed the partial waiver that was granted on this one is "reasonable justification shall include but not be limited to" it allowed them to bring in some additional criteria that are not listed. The last piece is five criteria and in the last criteria is the only place where the term "shall" comes up. In his mind, as the author of most of this language, the only effective appeals should be something where they have been clearly arbitrary and capricious. which he hoped they had not been. or in a case where somebody objected to a waiver. The last section "E" says "you shall not issue" under certain conditions. otherwise. this is a discretionary decision on the part of the City. When this provision was originally written. it was with the street improvement standards about 18 years ago, they provided for modifications, deferrals. and waivers. At that time for deferrals they did not have the Fee- Ung Short Plat Administrative Decision Appeal LUA-08-002 November 9, 2010 Page 3 In-Lieu-Of, that was created approximately 8-9 years ago, other cities including Kirkland had that and it was believed to be a reasonable alternative to having people build these small pieces of sidewalk that are not connected at this point. The Examiner stated that a Fee-In-Lieu is in place of a deferral, a waiver would be outright, and it does not have to be done. Mr. Watts stated that was correct, a waiver has been used over the years to concede that in certain situations street improvements are not going to be built. Those are almost exclusively until these two recent short plats have been used for cases where it physically is not going to be built either due to steep topography, wetlands, creeks, right-of-way that clearly was not going to connect to anything because ifran into l-405, it was only used for those. Prior to having the Fee-In-Lieu-Of they would do deferrals with a restrictive covenant and a no protest agreement to future LID's which is a very awkward feature to have on a title, moving to the Fee-In- Lieu-Of provided people the option of installing the improvements themselves or paying a fee in lieu that the City would use for similar type improvements somewhere in the City. A Fee-In-Lieu-Of is suggested every year, it is based on the City's average cost in the CIP projects for building, curb and gutter. There are many CIP projects that have unit costs for that, this is not a land use fee so it is not vested at time of application, it is a fee that is in place at the date it is paid. In 2008 when they had the original request, the costs the prior year were considerably lower for curb, gutter and sidewalk than they have been in recent years. That is why, if the fee had been paid in 2008 the total fee would have been $13,000.00 unfortunately for those two streets today, they come closer to $23,000.00 based on what the Fee-In-Lieu-Of is at this time frame. This is a 3-lot, thru lot short plat, there is an existing house on Shattuck and two new lots are created with streets on either side of the lots. There is a double blind that in one case there is a very small short plat that is very hard to pick up these kind of costs and then has the bind of having two street frontages for a very limited number of lots. At the same time the Fee-In-Lieu-Of discussion was going on with Council, he also brought a proposal to them to basically exempt short plats of four lots of or less. Many cities, including Seattle, do that recognizing that it is very expensive and is very difficult to recover the costs when only two or three new homes are being built. Council opted to not approve that blanket waiver and wanted each of these to continue to have a default condition that they would either build the improvements or pay the fee-in-lieu-of, and that the City would continue to look at it on an individual case to see if they warranted waivers. Until these two short plats came in they have been following that criteria for waivers only in situations where it was physically unlikely that improvements could be built without major retaining walls. They have had the circumstances that are in this industry, these are both very representative projects of that, by the time you look at what the market is going to pay for houses today versus all the costs of building the houses including considerable City costs, connection charges, traffic mitigation fees, park mitigation fees, fire mitigation fees, there is a lot of costs that piling on another $23,000.00 to a project that is only addition two new building lots seems somewhat high. Mr. Ung and Mr. Turalba were both directed to go in this direction, to request the waivers. These requests are now reviewed by the Public Works Department, which is now a separate department than where Mr. Watts is located. He advised Jan that he personally would be supportive and make a best faith effort to get those departments to agree to that, that information was poorly conununicated with Mr. Ung to be a certainty versus that they would support it but still had to go through the process and see what other parts of the City would agree to. Originally the Public Works Department, like everybody else in City Government is facing a number Ung Short Plat Administrative Decision Appeal LUA-08-002 November 9, 2010 Page 4 of economic challenges as we JI and was reluctant to Jet go of these perceived fees. After a great deal of discussion, trying to be equitable not only with these projects, but other projects that are out there, these are not the only smaJI short plats waiting to hopefully be built, they agreed that they would have another decision cnteria for waiver of street improvements for lots that already had a house built on them, one could argue that there was no really reasonable nexus that that lot was wasn't creating additional traffic, that lot was not creating additional pedestrians and that they felt justified that they could waive the frontage improvements for the lot that had an existing house. For Mr. Turalba that was the only lot, the new lot was an interior lot behind the existing house, so the waiver for the one street with the existing frontage house was basically all they had to pay. They got a total waiver. In Mr. Ung's case, he received a similar waiver for the existing parcel on Shatruck that has a house already, they waived that improvement but they are still going to require it and that is the decision they made for the new parcel on Davis. Unfortunately, they did not check to see what address was current for Mr. Ung and the old address was listed on the Board of Public Works files and that was the address that was used, the letter was returned to the City and at some point following that, Mr. Watts had a discussion with Mr. Ung at the front counter, at which time he gave Mr. Ung a copy of the letter, he still felt the number was too high, especially when he thought that half of $13,000.00 does not equal $11,000.00, he could understand that concern. Rather than taking the letter he handed it hack to me and asked Mr. Watts to see ifhe could get the fee reduced to have of the $11,000.00. He agreed to talk to the various Public Works Department people, after that discussion there was no equitable way of splitting this fee or making it less that what it is. A new letter was issued, establishing a new appeal date because they had gone past the original appeal date on the first letter to allow Mr. Ung the opportunity to appeal the decision ifhe so elected and proceeded on that basis. He characterized this neighborhood pretty much as the pictures show, most right-of-ways are substandard in width anywhere from 30-feet to 45-feet, standards are 50-55 feet. Generally just pavement somewhere in the neighborhood of 18-feet to 24-feet is pretty wide for this neighborhood, not many sidewalks; however projects that have been built in the neighborhood have built sidewalks. There is a project on 15th a little north of this site that recently built sidewalks, there is a larger plat two to three blocks to the south built about 10 years ago that built substantial curb, gutter and sidewalk. There is a City project near the park to the east of this site that built some street improvements as part of the project. There have been some level of street improvements in the area but certainly nothing on the blocks that are part of the discussion today, Mr. Ung and Mr. Turalba's properties. Those blocks are just paved, there is no curb and gutter, just shoulders that people park on. However, the topography is fairly flat, there is no strong physical reason why those improvements couldn't be built. There is no topography or critical areas that preclude building those improvements. How the criteria is applied, there certainly is some room for it and they exhibited some flexibility in evolution just in approving these two waivers, they recognize that the economics of development, particularly small short plats has changed radically since 2008 and that it's very difficult for these projects to proceed. Mr. Watts and the City want Mr. Ung to be successful in moving this project into a development mode and recognize that the added costs are significant today and they make a big difference whether these projects go forward or people wind up losing their property and their investment in the community. He apologized that they could not get to a better answer, for the length of time some of the internal negotiations went on with this and some things that an applicant does not see in terms of how they have to look at how a decision affects other properties, there have been similar type of situations they have not moved forward with waivers and to recognize that there are a dozen or so similar projects sitting out there so it does Ung Short Plat Administrative Decision Appeal LUA-08-002 November 9, 2010 Page 5 have some significant fee impacts to the Transportation group to make this type of waiver. They have to look at precedence, they do not want to be arbitrary and capricious, whatever is done for these individuals even though it comes up to a different answer that one person pays zero and the other pays $11,000.00 they were really granted similar waivers for the street frontage, for the lot that has an existing house they did waive the street improvements for that. It would be a significant change for the Public Works Department in any timeframe, but even more so now with the economic climate they are in as well. That was our decision, they feel that the waiver procedures were set up to be largely discretionary on the City's part and the default condition was to build the improvements and they have been even stronger in that place once we set up a Fee-In°Lieu-Of, that is a smarter way for the whole community to be using that financial resource and in most cases even at the $11,000.00 it probably is less expensive than it would be to try and get an engineer to design this limited improvement and for a contractor to come out and built this small level improvement. They do recognize that it is a high number, the average costs have gone up considerably. These numbers are very comparable to what other cities both in the region and on a national basis are using. These are the norm for unit costs for curb, gutter and sidewalk. The Examiner stated that in the two years since the original estimate of $13,000.00 for both streets, prices have gone up substantially. Mr. Watts stated in retrospect the $13,000.00 was very low, they had some CIP projects in 2007 that the unit costs being used for curb, gutter and sidewalk were probably artificially low. The contractors were making their money on other items, but those were what was used to create those numbers. The numbers here were considerably lower than what other jurisdictions were using. Once they moved to 2009, the 2008 numbers came more toward the industry standard, when we moved to 2010 they decided not to escalate those numbers and kept with the same numbers that we had for the prior year. Mr. Ung stated that the money he spent on developing the two lots, he is not making any money whatsoever, and he is just trying to get his money back. The cost to develop those two lots it does not make sense for me to go and pay this $11,000.00 to complete the project, it just is not there. There is not much difference between one lot and two lots and there is no detrimental effect to the vicinity. The Examiner stated that there is twice the traffic, each time you add another house you add approximately 10 vehicle trips per day. One house would be 10, two houses would be 20 etc., again these are approximate numbers. Mr. Ung stated that he was about to lost the property. The Examiner stated that he could sympathize with that, but unfortunately his is still bound by the Code as Mr. Watts described. I understand that you were told that this department's intent was to support your request but it had to go through a review or criteria process with other departments or divisions also to determine what their needs were at the same time. Mr. Ung stated that he was told the waiver would be granted. He was told the wrong story at the wrong time. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:44 am. Ung Short Plat Administrative Decision Appeal LUA-08-002 November 9, 2010 Page 6 FINDINGS. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The appellant, Pak S. Ung, filed an appeal of a decision denying a waiver of the requirement to install street improvements or pay a fee in lieu of installing those improvements. 2. The appellant owns property located at 1517 Shattuck Avenue South in the City of Renton. The parcel is what is called a through-lot which means it runs between two streets and has frontage along both of those streets. 1n this case the second frontage is located along Davis. 3. The appellant sought to subdivide the subject site into three (3) lots. An existing home is located along Shattuck Avenue S. The second lot would be an interior lot and would be interior to both Shattuck and Davis. The third lot would be located on Davis Avenue and would have frontage along that street. As proposed, both of the new lots would take their access from Davis. 4. The City's regulations require that when property is platted, the underlying applicant must make street improvements along the adjacent frontage. Those improvements include curb, gutter and sidewalks. 1n this case, the appellant would be required to improve both the frontage along Shattuck as well as the frontage along Davis since the plat has frontage along both of those streets. 5. The frontage along Shattuck is approximately 75 feet long. The frontage along Davis is 76.85 feet. 6. The Director reviewed the request in conjunction with other City staff. The Director determined that the waiver could be granted for Shattuck noting "Due to the minimal impact of one additional lot, the absence of similar improvements in the vicinity, the waiver is hereby granted as requested for Shattuck Avenue south." The Director noted that two lots would be accessed from Davis and that there would be additional impacts on Davis and that "a waiver cannot be approved for Davis Avenue South." The Director noted "a fee-in-lieu is approved for 76.85 feet of frontage on Davis Avenue South, which for payment in 2010 will be $11,833.36." The Director concludes that either the improvements be completed or the fee-in-lieu be paid prior to recording the short plat. 7. The appellant referred to a nearby property where that property's owner was developing a short plat and the improvements were waived and no fee was required. 8. The Director noted that the City has developed a policy for smaller short plats where an existing home is already located on the property that will be short platted. They have determined that one additional home, generally interior to the frontage creates minimal impact. The frontage where a home is already located is treated as exempt and frontage improvements are generally waived if there are no other nearby frontage improvements. That explains the quoted language above where the Director waived the improvements along Shattuck. 9. The Director noted that the City used the policy evenhandedly and granted both the appellant and the other property owner a waiver along one frontage. The Director noted that the appellant's property has two frontages. An outright waiver was granted for Shattuck but that a second waiver for the second frontage was inappropriate. The waiver for the second frontage would be granted by the City only if the appellant paid a fee in lieu. Ung Short Plat Administrative Decision Appeal LUA-08-002 November 9, 2010 Page 7 10. The appellant also inquired about the amount of the fee. The appellant had submitted another request regarding this property in September, 2008. The fees calculated at that time for both Shattuck and Davis were $13,072.00. The Director noted that fees are based on current costs as calculated by the City. The basis costs have increased resulting in a larger fee. It is unclear why the appellant did not act at that time and submitted a new request. 11. The Director indicated that the fees might be applied to areas that need improvements if they are not needed in this location. 12. A review of the area shows few if any similar improvements in the general area and none in the immediately vicinity. 13. The provisions for a waiver are found in Section 4.9-250C: C W AIYER PROCEDURES: I. Authority for Waiver, General: (Reserved) 2. Authority for Waiver of Street Improvements: The Community and Economic Development Administrator or his/her designee may grant waiver of the installation of street improvements subject to the determination that there is reasonable justification for such waiver. (Ord. 5156, 9-26-2005; Ord. 5450, 3- 2-2009) 3. Application and Fee: Any application for such a waiver shall specify in detail the reason for such requested waiver and may contain such evidence including photographs, maps, and surveys as may be pertinent thereto. The application fee shall be as specified in RMC 4-1-170, Land Use Review Fees. 4. Decision Criteria, General: (Reserved) 5. Decision Criteria for Waivers of Street Improvements: Reasonable justification shall include but not be limited to the following: a. Required street improvements will alter an existing wetlands or stream, or have a negative impact on a shoreline's area. b. Existing steep topography would make required street improvements infeasible. c. Required street improvements would have a negative impact on other properties, such as restricting available access. d. There are no smtilar improvements in the vicinity and there is little likelihood that the improvements will be needed or required in the next ten (10) years. e. In no case shall a waiver be granted unless it is shown that there will be no detrimental effect on the public health, safety or welfare if the improvements are not installed, and that the improvements are not needed for current or future development. (Ord. 5137, 4-25-2005) 14. The provisions governing paying a fee in lieu of installing improvements is found in Section 4-9-060C9: 9. Fee in Lieu of Required Street Improvements: a. General. The provisions of this Section establish under what Ung Short Plat Administrative Decision Appeal LUA-08-002 November 9, 2010 Page 8 circumstances the requirements of this Chapter may be satisfied with payment of a fee in lieu of required street improvements. b. Authority To Grant and Duration. 1. Application: If the proposed development of the subject property requires approval through a short plat approval described in the subdivision ordinance, a request for payment of a fee in lieu of street improvements will be considered as part of this process under the provisions of this Section. 11. Duration: If granted under a short plat review process, the authorization to pay a fee in lieu of street improvements is binding on the City for all development permits issued for that short plat approval under the building code within five (5) years of the granting of the request for payment of a fee in lieu of street improvements. c. Standards: The City will not accept the applicant's proposed payment of a fee in lieu of street improvements if the Planning/Building/Public Worlcs Administrator or his/her designee determines that it is in the City's interest that the street improvements be installed abutting the subject property, taking into account such factors as the pedestrian safety impacts that result from the development. The City may accept payment of a fee in lieu instead of requiring installation of street improvements in the following circumstances: 1. There are no similar improvements in the vicinity and there is no likelihood that the improvements will be needed or required in the next five (5) years; or 11. Installation of the required improvement would require substantial off-site roadway modifications; or 111. The Public Works Administrator or his/her designee determines that installation of the required improvement would result in a safety hazard; or (Ord. 5450, 3-2-2009) 1v. Other unusual circumstances preclude the construction of the improvements as required. d. Amount of Payment of Fee in Lieu of Street Improvements. In each instance where the City approves a proposed fee-in-lieu under the provisions of this Section, the amount of the fee-in-lieu shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the then-estimated cost of constructing the street improvements that would otherwise be required under this Chapter, based on information compiled and kept current by the Public Works Department on the cost of street improvement construction. (Ord. 5450, 3-2-2009) e. Use of Funds. In each instance where the City accepts payment of a fee in lieu of installing a street improvement under the provisions of this Section, the City shall deposit those funds into a reserve account and expend the funds collected within five (5) years of the date collected to fund other pedestrian safety improvements in the City. f. No Further Obligation from the Property. In each instance where the City accepts payment of a fee in lieu of installing street improvements, the subject property will not be subject to participation Ung Short Plat Administrative Decision Appeal LUA-08-002 November 9, 2010 Page 9 in future street improvement costs (along the property frontage) unless redevelopment occurs that will generate more traffic trips than what was occurring at the property at the time of the payment of the fee in lieu of installation of street improvements. (Ord. 5170, 12-5- 2005) CONCLUSIONS: I. The appellant has the burden of demonstrating that the decision of the City Official was either in error, or was otherwise contrary to law or constitutional provisions, or was arbitrary and capricious (Section 4-8- 11 O(E)(7)(b ). The appellant has demonstrated that the action of the City should be modified or reversed. The decision is reversed. 2. Arbitrary and capricious action has been defined as willful and unreasoning action in disregard of the facts and circumstances. A decision, when exercised honestly and upon due consideration of the facts and circumstances, is not arbitrary or capricious (Northern Pacific Transport Co. v Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission, 69 Wn. 2d 472,478 (1966). 3. An action is likewise clearly erroneous when, although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing body, on the entire evidence, is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed. (Ancheta v Daly, 77 Wn. 2d 255, 259 (1969). An appellant body should not necessarily substitute its judgment for the underlying agency with expertise in a matter unless appropriate. 4. There appear to be two different code provisions that apply to the installation of street improvements. There are the waiver provisions cited in Finding l3 and there are.the "fee in lieu" provisions cited in Finding 14. The "fee in lieu" provisions are discussed under the "Deferral" provisions. "Deferral" is a separate method of avoiding the need to install improvements as part of the development permitting process. It appears that the appellant sought a waiver and not a deferral. It appears that a waiver should have either been granted or denied based on the improvements or lack thereof in the immediate vicinity. The record is not clear regarding the manner in which a request for a waiver was shuttled to a deferral where fee in lieu of improvements came about.· The appellant was entitled to a review of whether a waiver was appropriate or not. 5. The record shows that there are no similar improvements anywhere in the area of subject site. The record appears to support a conclusion that no such improvements would be required or installed within the next ten years in this location. There do not appear to be any adverse health or safety issues. It appears a waiver would be appropriate. Whether a fee in lieu is appropriate comes down to whether a deferral was appropriately considered. The record does not support converting the appellant's request for a waiver to a deferral. The outcome, requiring a fee in lieu, would seem to have had the effect of converting a request for a waiver to one where a deferral was considered and approved with the fee proposed by the Director. 6. Under the circumstances, the appellant appears to be entitled to an outright waiver. In that case, the fee in lieu requested of the applicant is incorrect. The appellant should prevail. 7. This office would welcome a clarification of the two procedures, waiver versus deferral, discussed in this decision to avoid inconsistent results in similar cases. Ung Short Plat Administrative Decision Appeal LUA-08-002 November 9, 2010 Page 10 DECISION: The decision below is reversed and the waiver is granted. ORDERED THIS 9'"day of November 2010 HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED 11:!IS 9th day of November 2010 to the parties of record: Pak S. Ung Neil Watts 19312 47th Ave NE Lake Forest Park, WA 98155 Development Services Dir. City of Renton Mr. James Nelson 132 NW 131" Street Seattle, WA 98177 TRANSMITTED THIS 9" day of November 2010 to the following: Mayor Denis Law Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrator Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Jennifer Henning, Development Services Stacy Tucker, Development Services Renton Reporter Dave Pargas, Fire Larry Meckling, Building Official Planning Commission Transportation Division Utilities Division Neil Watts, Development Services Janet Conklin, Development Services Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section lOOGofthe City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., November 23, 2010. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors oflaw or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., November 23, 2010. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. Ung Short Plat Administrative Decision Appeal LUA-08-002 November 9, 2010 Page 11 The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to koow the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. "* ,f .t ~ ~ OLD REPUBLIC ~ 'fl-TITLE & ESf:ROW 4114 1 98th Street SW, Su~e 4 Lynnwood, WA 98036 *· .. (425) 776-1970 Fax: (425) 776-5710 ¥ )t-'}'ir To: PREVIEW PROPERTIES 2150 N 107TH ST, STE 170 SEATTLE, WA 98133- Attn: PAK UNG Your Reference: DAWSON/UNG SUPPLEMENTAL TO COMMITMENT Sup No. Date Order No. 1 November 15, 2010 5207089087 The above numbered commitment (including any supplements or amendments thereto) is hereby modified and/or supplemented to reflect the following additional items: A SEARCH OF THE RECORDS OF KING COUNTY INDICATES NO ADDITIONAL MATTERS OF RECORD *EXCEPT AS SHOW HEREIN. THE EFFECITVE DATE OF THE COMMITMENT IS HEREBY EXTENDED TO NOVEMBER 9,2010. 1) Paragraph(s) 9 of Schedule B -Section 2 (Exceptions) of our Commitment is/are hereby deleted. 2010 PROPER1Y TAXES ARE PAID IN FULL IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,666.99 Except to the extent expressly stated, this supplemental neither modifies any of the temis and provisions of the commitment or prior supplementals, nor does it extend the effectve date of the commitment or prior supplementals Cc: FOR INFORMATION AND ASSISTANCE ON THIS ORDER CONTACT: LYNNWOOD OFFICE Mike McCarthy, Title Officer, Unit Manager (mmcarthy@ortc.com) Cindy Fraser, Title Assistant (cfraser@ortc.com) Telephone: (425) 776-4305 Fax: (425) 776-3350 4114198th St SW, Suite #4, Lynnwood Washington 98036 Our staff can assist you with properties in King, Pierce and Snohomish Counties OLD REPUBUC TITLE, LTD. Privacy Policy Notice PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) generally prohibits any financial institution, directly or through its affiliates, from sharing nonpublic personal information about you with a nonaffiliated third party unless the institution provides you with a notice of its privacy policies and practices, such as the type of information that it collects about you and the categories of persons or entities to whom it may be disclosed. In compliance with the GLBA, we are providing you with this document, which notifies you of the privacy policies and practices of OLD REPUBUC TITLE, LTD .. We may collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources: Information we receive from you such as on applications or other forms. Information about your transactions we secure from our files, or from [our affiliates or] others. Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. Information that we receive from others involved in your transaction, such as the real estate agent or lender. Unless it is specifically stated otherwise in an amended Privacy Policy Notice, no additional nonpublic personal information will be collected about you. We may disclose any of the above information that we collect about our customers or former customers to our affiliates or to nonaffiliated third parties as permitted by law. We also may disclose this infonnation about our customers or former customers to the following types of nonaffiliated companies that perform marketing services on our behalf or with whom we have joint marketing agreements: Financial service providers such as companies engaged in banking, consumer finance, securities and insurance. Non-financial companies such as envelope stuffers and other fulfillment service providers. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY LAW. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products or services to you. We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. ORT 287-C 5/07/01 ,: 1 .; ~· ·•, i. ,,, .... :.11 •, ·~· ·~; .~J --~-: ·W·· ' C i·:,:-,".·:· ~ ~ ... ~:, \ ,.,;.;..;.r· j l?.7 ·. 1·,.;; ~~~ ""' ! 1 '.' ~ , , 'i '.,· ·.=:.. k \' .j_ ·: •• :.:..·"J 1 ·• );,::,·;·, ·\A·l? ,.~, •. •\ ·.,;·.~· .:..:~; ''.!:.·· ·;..'/".· I•:"', '-;,-::-::· . ~=.-:- ;,i\_! 1··1------.-... ,·,,· .. -"- t :,·.,"II f:}i l: ,~~-3: I t-,~~""""--j his mup h«!!: b~11 copli:!d from the pub le records <lnd I; i:i·o·11ded sol~ly for the pu1:pQit!!'o'f as;191:1nq 1~ .I_Qc.:.t:1r:11·ihe Ciren11~s,No.~1,:rb111t1e:="·ii1"! .:u;stirted.~r. ir1,:i,~.1. f?.1•·:k~;·f1i111~·i11~~1r l"!(ir:~11111 r fot ~,:i~i!fllm•;·, i!· ~:ri !'{iri !li'l"[1~"'1·;'1_ii1 :;_.-it! 1 •r1. 11 ! . :~~/~~.;'.! -:ifth~ 1>1l':;!1il1siis·Or: 1f11::! bC:irio.n ·':I .mpi:0·1-e11fe11f.$· ,;u;:c:em111,{d·b:':' .itru~·1 hi Ip ),\,\s'w .s~)J l 1yd ynamic•s.ndi WA King/;cssnrncp, ''"P" ?pare•, li J-3 3 4(140 l 43 5 10'2li2010 -~.* ~": OLD REPUBLIC -'fi-r TITLE & ESCROW *-i,+* Attached Commitment Issued for the sole use of: JOHN L. SCOTT 930 SW 152ND ST BURIEN, WA 98166 Attention: PAUL LAU 4114 198th Street SW, Suite 4 Lynnwood, WA 98036 (425) 776-1970 Our Order Number 5207089087 Customer Reference UNG/DAWSON When Replying Please Contact: Unit 1 Mike McCarthy Direct line: ( 425) 776-4305 Fax: ( 425) 776-3350 See Attached Commitment to Insure -· .... ---··-· ·-••.1 -•-• C --····-----------. .. -·-- ALTA Commitment COMMITMENT FOR illLE INSURANCE Issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL illLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation ("Company''), for a valuable consideration, commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Recuirements; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A by the Company. All liability and obligation under this Commitment shall cease and terminate six (6) months after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue the policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. The Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon recuest. Issued through the office of: OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Old Republic Title, Ltd. 4114 198th Street SW, Suite 4 Lynnwood, WA 98036 Authorized Officer or Agent A Corporation 400 Second Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 371-1111 By Attest Page 1 of 8 Pages ORTIC 1613 (2006) OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY President Secretary Order Number: 5207089087 ALTA Commitment SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: October 15, 2010, at 8:00 AM 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance -2008 Amount: $205,000.00 Premium: $766.00 Tax: $72.77 Rate: Homeowners Customer Reference: UNG/DAWSON Proposed Insured: REBECCA DAWSON, presumptively subject to a community interest if married or in a registered domestic partnership ALTA Loan Policy -2006 Amount: $199,803.00 Premium: $540.00 Tax: $51.30 Rate: Simultaneous Note: Extended Coverage Proposed Insured: EVERGREEN HOME LOANS The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said Policy or Policies are set forth in Exhibit A attached. Copies of the Policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this Commitment. 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is Fee 4. Title to the Fee estate or interest in the land is at the Effective Date vested in: PAK S. UNG and DARA UNG, husband and wife 5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: Page 2 of 8 Pages ORTIC 1614 OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order Number: 5207089087 See Legal Description Exhibit. This Commitment is not valid without SCHEDULE A and SCHEDULE B, Page 3 of 8 Pages ORTIC 1614 OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order Number: 5207089087 SCHEDULE B Customer Reference: UNG/DAWSON I. REQUIREMENTS: 1. Pay us the premiums, fees and charges for the policy. 2. Documents satisfactory to us creating the interest in the land and/or the mortgage to be insured must be signed, delivered, and recorded. 3. You must tell us in writing the name of anyone not referred to in this Commitment who will get an interest in the land or who will make a loan on the land. We may then make additional requirements or exceptions. 4. Release(s) or Reconveyance(s) of appropriate items. 5. If any document in the completion of this transaction is to be executed by an attorney-in- fact, the completed Power of Attorney form should be submitted for review prior to closing. 6. Any interest of a spouse/domestic partner of REBECCA DAWSON. NOTE: The name of said spouse/domestic partner must be furnished. Page 4 of 8 Pages ORTIC 1616 OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order Number: 5207089087 SCHEDULE B continued Customer Reference: UNG/DAWSON IL Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the Effective Date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 1. Encroachments, or questions of location, boundary and/or area which an accurate survey may disclose. 2. Easements or claims of easements not disclosed by the public records. 3. Rights or claims of parties in possession not disclosed by the public records. 4. Any lien or right to lien for services, material, labor, and/or contributions to an employee benefit fund or State Workers' Compensation that is not disclosed by the public records. 5. Exceptions and reservations in United States patents, Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements and equitable servitudes. Water rights, claims or title to water. 6. Any service, installation or general connection charges for sewer, water, electricity, telephone, gas and/or garbage removal. 7. General taxes not now payable; special assessments and/or special levies, if any, that are not disclosed by the public records. 8. Lien of Real Estate Excise Sale Tax upon any sale of said premises, as established by the Washington State Department of Revenue. NOTE: As of the date of this commitment, the current Excise Tax Rate is: .0178. Confirm the current rate by contacting the following prior to closing: Name of Agency King County Records and Election Division, Excise Tax Department at Telephone Number (206) 296-1843 Page 5 of 8 Pages ORTIC 1618 OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order Number: 5207089087 9. GENERAL TAXES, PLUS INTEREST AND PENALTY AFTER DELINQUENT; 1ST HALF DELINQUENT ON MAY 1; 2ND HALF DELINQUENT ON NOVEMBER 1: Year Amount Billed Amount Paid Parcel No. Levy Code Assessed Valuation Land Improvements 2010 $2,666.99 $1,333.50 334040-1435-08 2100 $161,000.00 $77,000.00 10. Deed of Trust to secure an indebtedness of the amount stated below and any other amounts payable under the terms therecf, ORTIC 1618 Amount Trustor/Borrower Trustee Beneficiary/Lender Dated Recorded $262,500.00 Pak S. Ung and Dara Ung, husband and wife LS Title of Washington Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., solely as nominee for Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. December 18, 2006 December 21, 2006 in Official Records under Recording Number 20061221001045 The record beneficial interest under said Deed of Trust as a result of the last recorded assignment thereof is, Vested In by instrument Recorded BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP fka Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP March 26, 2010 in Official Records under Recording Number 20100326000254 Substitution of Trustee under said Deed of Trust, New Trustee Recorded Recontrust Company, N.A. March 26, 2010 in Official Records under Recording Number 20100326000255 Page 6 of 8 Pages OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order Number: 5207089087 11. According to the application for Title Insurance, this Company has been requested to issue an Owner's Policy which does not appear to represent a fair market value. The forthcoming Policy must be issued in an amount at least equal to the full value of the estate insured, in accordance with our Rating Schedule on file in the office of the Washington State Insurance Commissioner. Note We may be willing to remove this exception upon a conveyance to a bona fide purchaser, pending submission of a copy of the purchase and sale agreement and any addendums thereto. ···················· Informational Notes··················· A. NOTE: According to the public records, there have been no deeds conveying the property described in this report recorded within a period of 24 months prior to the date hereof except as follows: NONE NOTE: The last recorded transfer or agreement to transfer the land described herein is as follows: Recorded March 31, 1999 in Official Records under Recording Number 9903311834 B. Pursuant to WAC Code 284-29-260, there will be a cancellation charge (minimum of $50 plus tax) in the event the proposed transaction does not close. C. NOTE: This report covers land which was identified by street address and/or tax parcel number(s) -assessor's parcel number(s) when the order was opened. D. The applicable rate(s) for the policy(s) being offered by this report or commitment appears to be section(s) 34, 28 and 18. E. Short Term Rate ("STR") applies (but may be precluded or limited by application of the above shown section(s) of our Schedule of Fees and Charges.) F. NOTE : We find no pertinent matters of record against the name(s) of : REBECCA DAWSON Page 7 of 8 Pages ORTIC 1618 OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order Number: 5207089087 G. NOTE: Lender's policy may include IndorsementALTA 9 (CLTA 100), ALTA 22 (CLTA 116), ALTA8.l. H. NOTE: The CLTA 116 may describe the improvements as a Single Family Residence known as 1517 Shattuck Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. I. Note: The Premium for the Homeowner's Policy is itemized as follows: ORTIC 1618 Description Residential Sale Rate Homeowners Policy Surcharge Sales Tax Total Premium, including Tax rob/SD Amount $670.00 $96.00 $72.77 $838.77 Page 8 of 8 Pages OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ORDER NO. : 5207089087 EXHIBIT A The land referred to is situated in the County of King, City of Renton, State of Washington, and is described as follows: Lot(s) 5, Block 9, C.D. HILLMANS EARLINGTON GARDENS ADDITION TO THE CTIY OF SEATILE, DIVISION NO. 1, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page(s) 74, records of King County, Washington. SITUATE in the County of King, State of Washington. Property Address: 1517 Shattuck Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 ABBREVIATED LEGAL Lot(s) 5, Block 9, C.D. HILLMANS EARLINGTON GARDENS ADDITION TO THE CTIY OF SEATILE, DIVISION NO. 1 Tax Account No. 334040-1435-08 Page 1 of 1 Denis Law Mayor Sep_tember. 2, 2010 Pak Ung 1517 Shattuck Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 , Department of Community and_ Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator RE: Waiver Request for Street Improvements -_ Ung _Short Pla,t -1517 Shattuck Avenue South Dear Mr.Ung, We have reviewed your request to wai~e street improvem,e"nt require·ments for Sl1attuck Avenue.South and·Davis Avenue South, adjacent to a potential three lot short plat The short plat includ_es an existi~g house, and will create two additional building site. The waiver request_appears to meet review criteria for a partiaJwaiver outlined in Renton Municipal Code (RMC) 4'.9-2soc. The lot with the frontage on Shattuck Avenue South is already developed, and is not curre'ntly improv~d with curb, gutter or sidewalk iii the vicinity .. Due to the minimal im1fact of the one additional lot, and the absence of similar improvements in the vicinity, the waiver is hereby granted as requested for Shattuck Avenue South, The proposed short plat will create two additional building lots, one with frontage on Davis Avenue South, and the second with vehicular access from Davis Avenue South, Due to the additional impacts from the short plat to this street, a waiver cannot be approved for Davis_Avenue South, A fee-in:lieu is approved for the 76,8_5 feet of frontage on Davis Avenue South, which for payment in 2010 will be $11,833.36, The frontage improvements on Davis Avenue South must either be completed or the fee-in- lieu paid prior to recording of the short plat · , You have .·14 days from the date of t_his letter to appeal the administrative determination i_n accordance with City code. Appeals are to be filed in writng,' with the City Clerk and · require a filing fee in th_e amount of $250.00. Appeals must be filed with the City Clerk before Friday, September 17, 2010 at 5:00 p.m. -· · If you have further questions regarding this waiver, or the process to complete the recording of the short plat, please contact Jan Illian, Plan_ Reviewer, at 425-430-7216, Sincerely; _ Neil Watts, Director Development Services Division cc: Gregg ~immerm.an 1 ·Pu.blic Works Administrator Jan Illian, Plan Reviewer Renton_ City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington ,98057. • rentonwa.gov . I . I I i I ' APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RENTON RIGHT OF WAY USE-DEFERRALS -WAIVERS -VARIANCES -FEE IN LIEU 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 (425) 430-7216 U ,, I/ s/ hr"J.rT A/41 PROJECT NAME:----=-'''---"--V:.ir--'-'-----''-----1----,_ ...,,l'___:Lf __ L ____________ _ SITE ADDRESS: / S" ( 7 5ffA77UC-n 1tl/E J ~ ~ ~, UA: tJ r 8_(1 ~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Include King County Assessors Parcel No: ______________________ _ APPLICANT: p;,/( )i _ V.Jl--r BUSINESS ADDRESS:-------------------------- Zip Code ATTACH A SEPARATE LETTER WITH TIDS APPLICATION STATING IN DETAIL: 1. The request 2. Applicable City Code 3. Items and quantities involved 4. Justification forrequest 5. Amount of time requested 6. Provide vicinity map (8-1/2 x 11 inches) Attach a drawing or sketch of your proposal. Mail or drop off the completed application and map to: CITY OF RENTON Development Services Division Jan Illian, Coordinator 1055 -S. Grady Way 6°' Floor Renton, WA 98057 425-430-7216 OFFICE USE ONLY OFFICE USE ONLY DEFERRAL ( ) New ( ) Extension Offsite ____________ _ Onsite _____________ _ OFFICE USE ONLY OFFICE USE ONLY VARIAN CE ( ) New ( ) Extension ( ) Underground ( ) Slope Grades ( ) Driveway ( ) Noise EXCESS R/W ( ) FEE IN LIEU ( ) WAIVER () CITY Of RENTON RECEIVED H:\File Sys\BPW -Board of Public Works\APPLICATION\BPW2007 .doc JUN 2 4 201f1 BUILDING DIVISION JJ41f &/ (~h-,A--l,<_ 'l-l~ f e,F-V1 [) ~ C: fer-4~- »AJ (//14;,: I P1tK 4, DJV6-, u=-vV ,£;_,4-.z_ rb l'e?q~/- 1 ~E Ve?"!<.. , r ' ~ l:}41 I/(:; ,zA 0~ 12,L _t,,jk_~Jf-c ff11. ~7 P,"'D/~ ·14,,.e__ f./tV % 5,/i_&yf /J (;;;:_.f-{ L u 4 oq ,,-DC;JcJ..) !(Jew o.,::,/'J s 7 tL c:;t!-7 1 C? AJ -:r:-,-..J -, Cl~ 4 ..u:::: A -:z>c., ,-)1) -r r.-f' ~ ~ r ?).£?-W.tt-{.-f< .J r::cr2_ ') D!Z._ } t=-1 f 1~-r, p}; ,-,...i _ (j){)A -. (> ~ Q_:41· ~11 ; Pkf( ;1 ' LJ;u' V 11] / 2 I/-7 '11 kc/S Jr;_ .f,e,, Ltf( ,{__ I <:.0 ,4 q f ( ~ (!-oy 6s~o -J y:~0 R CITY OF REt..TON ECEIVEO JUN 2 4 2010 BUILDING DIVISION 25 T24N R4E-- 94W. C2 36 T24N R4E J2., -= r22N R4E 1 T22NH4E RESIDEl'_,IJIA~ ~ (RC) Resource Conservation I P--~ {R-1) Residential 1 du/ac _f:'_-_-1 I (R-4) Residential 4 du/ac I FH I (R-8) Residential 8 du/ac 455W \C3 I .,~HJ (RMH) Residential Manufactured Homes ! ~-10 I (R-10) Residential 10 du/ac § (R-14) Residential 14 du/ac [R~-,-, (RM-F) Residential Multi-Family \ PM~ (RM-T) Residential Multi-Family Traditional r '-~ (RM-U} Residential Mulf1-Family Urban Center ,370 '·, JF5 --~;-; ;~,;RSE :.~ 371 26 T23N R5E ···~ 25 825 826 .',, ,, ~:1a~~ c-:17j MIXED USE CENTERS [:vl (CV} center Village 34 T23N R5E -~ 3 T22N ASE ,J>~1J (UC-Nl} Urban Center -North 1 \uc-~1 (UC-N2} Urban Center -North 2 [_:_J J (CD} Center Downtown COMMERCIAL 35 T23N ASE 36 833 J7 2 T22N ASE 1T2 INDUSTRIAL G (JLJ Industrial -Light ~ (IM) Industrial -Medium 0 (IH) Industrial -Heavy -----Renton City Limits _ co~ (COR) Commercial/Office/Residential -·-·-·-Adjacent City Limits ~ (CA) Commercial Arterial @] (CO) Commercial Office \ :_iQ [CN) Commercial Neighborhood KROLl PAGE PAGE# INDEX SECT/TOWIII/IIANGE ~ .... ~ Ja;l "' ii:: z ... "' E-- C'I .... I ... (.!I IM ~ 9W161t,Sl co ' SW1911,S, f ! co • • ZONING MAP BOOK PW TECHNICAL SERVICES PRINTED ON 11/13/09 Tl-, humn>I ~, """'"""""''""''""-not ''"'"'""''°'"' ... "'"'"''··,..j" ... '""" '""""'''""''"""'"'"""~"'"""'"''"°'''""""" 11'1k""'P""''""'"'dll>r<,r,di<pl>,p,a"°' .. on1,. R-1 R-1 F3 -18 T23N RSE E 1/2 .-- "'"~ .. EB C".l "" R-8 R-8 N R-8 = --i N ~ S161h9t • z :; ~ trJ R-8 ~ -N R,B R-8 H3 -30 T23N RSE E 1/2 G3 0 200 400 1-t.J I Feet 19 T23N RSE E 1/2 1 :4,800 5319 - ----D-eM:n~:~o:\a.w _____ ............. r City of l _!.-....,.....,~J..!filjj June 25, 2010 Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch.Administrator Pak A. Ung 19312 47'h Avenue Seattle, WA 98155 SUBJECT: Request for Extension of Project's Period of Validity Ung Short Plat/ City of Renton File LUAOS-002 Dear Mr. Ung: This letter is sent in response to your request for an extension of the above referenced project's approved period of validity. Under Ordinance No. 5452 (RMC 4-1-0SOF) authorization has been given to the Planning Director to approve an additional two-year extension beyond the standard extensions possible under the Code for any land use or subdivision project that was valid on or after April 1, 2009. Our records indicate that this project has expired on February 20, 2010. We understand that you are still working to complete this project and will require additional time. Therefore, your request for the two-year extension under .Ordinance No. 5452 is hereby granted. You now have until February 20, 2012 to record this project. You should be aware this is a one-time only extension and if the project is not recorded by the new expiration date it will become null and void and you will need to resubmit all application materials. I hope this extension meets your needs and that your p Laureen Nicolay at (425) 430-7294 if you have any furtt C.E. "Chip" Vincent Planning Director cc: City of Renton File No. LUAOS-002 . Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Kayren Kittrick, Plan Reviewer -------Ifs:ii t D1l Renton City Hall • 1 OS? South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov :/--, P.a-?( .4-c.:?J(:r f L./~f2_p ~_£ -ho t-J.2-F_s,4f-- .--fo /2~.f~j} r,., Y 5 { £,-f f'/4 f ,ty;v-c/(_ <...) t-> & _s r,fo,<_7 PL.,f--3 f(:?A.-Ir;./ /'fi?_) f 7 < OJ..t'r <... .1 y.:.eA_r:{ _ 1-UA og -oc,;;i__ 7t-<2-Ptbl1 ~; rkf( ;1 _ LJ;./ v 11 3 I 2-ff '7 "1? kvS JJ [:_ s~,c!1( ,<_ I u_) t4 q J7 ( ~ (!-oGj6'::>~0 -3 ~~0 R ECITCY OEP RENTON . IVEo JUN 2 4 2010 BUILDING 01v1s10N \ August 6, 2008 Pak and Dara Ung 1222 N 185th St, Suite l 02 Seattle WA 98133 SUBJECT: UNG Short Plat LUA08-002SHPL Dear Mr. & Mrs. Ung: The review submittal on the above-mentioned short plat has been completed and the following comments have been returned. Please review these comments and make the necessary changes. Once changes have been completed please resubmit three copies of the short plat drawings and three copies of any other related documents. SHORT PLA.T REVIEW COMMENTS: I. Information needed for final short plat approval includes the following: 2. Include a north arrow and scale for the drawing. NOTE: The previous scale shown for this drawing had been "l"=SO"'(noted just above the "SURVEY NOTES" block). It should have been noted as 1 "=40'. 3. Rename the "CERTIFICATION" block to OWNERS' DECLARATION. 4. The "APPROVALS" block for the City of Renton is in error. The only city official signing this short plat submittal is the Administrator of Public Works. 5. Note the plat information for the properties to the north and south of the subject parcel on the short plat drawing. The plat information should include the plat name as well as the plat's volume and page numbers. 6. Remove the numbers "I" and "2", which are shown within the Parcel C of City of Renton Renton Short Plat No. 414-79. 7. The surveyor prorated the lot distances. What is the basis for this proration, ( calculated or located monuments to the south have not been noted)? The proration could be explained wi_th a "NTS" detail. 8. Place the following note on the face of the mylar stating: "Front yard of Lot I shall face east toward Shattuck Ave. S, front yard of Lot 2 shall face north, and the front yard of Lot 3 shall face west toward Davis Ave S." (See Decision #6) ___ I:\P_l_an_R_e_vi_ew_lc_o_1:-:-:-;-0-:o-~-'-PG_la:-a-::-O-:--':-y~G--:-:-~-t:-:-:-:-h:-g"-h~--R-:"':es-n_tS 9 _,:.:..P~-:o-;-------~ @ This paper contains 50% recycled matenal, 30% post consumer AHF.AD OF THE CURVE ' June 19, 2008 Page2 Should you need to discuss any portion of this letter please contact me at (425) 430-7235. Sincerely, Carrie K. Olson Development Services, Plan Review .. ~ /?FAXED TO: Tom Touma, Touma Engineers: 425-251-0625 cc: Yellow File DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM August 5, 2008 Carrie Olson /\II Karen McFarland, x7209~ I \ Ung Short Plat, LUA-08-002-SHPL Format and Legal Description Review Technical Services staff have reviewed the above referenced short plat submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant: None. Information needed for final short plat approval includes the following: Include a north arrow and scale for the drawing. NOTE: The previous scale shown for this drawing had been "1 "=50"'(notedjust above the "SURVEY NOTES" block). It should have been noted as 1 "=40'. Rename the "CERTIFICATION" block to OWNERS' DECLARATION. The "APPROVALS" block for the City of Renton is in error. The only city official signing this short plat submittal is the Administrator of Public Works. Note the plat information for the properties to the north and south of the subject parcel on the short plat drawing. The plat information should include the plat name as well as the plat's volume and page numbers. Remove the numbers "l" and "2", which are shown within the Parcel C of City of Renton Renton Short Plat No. 414-79. The surveyor prorated the lot distances. What is the basis for this proration, ( calculated or located monuments to the south have not been noted)? The proration could be explained with a "NTS" detail. L:\LND-20 -Short Plats\0514\RV080805.doc DENSITY WORKSHEET City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98055 Phone:425-430-7200 Fax 425-430-7231 1. Gross area of property: 1 21 194 square feet 2. Deduction: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. Public street ** Private access easements** Critical Areas* Total excluded area: 3. Subtract Line 2 from line 1 for net area: 4. Divide lien 3 by 43,560 for net acreage 5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density _____ square feet ____ ......c...o square feet _____ square feet 2 square feet 3 21 194 square feet 4 __ ,._0.""4""8.,_7 acres 5 -------"'3 unit/lots 6 ___ 6"".""1.,_7 du/acre * Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways" Critical Areas buffers are not deducted/excluded. ** Alleys (public or private) donor have to be excluded, Project: Pak Ung Short Plat Date 10-Jun-08 CONFIRMATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH ALL CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL FOR UNG SHORT PLAT (LUAOS-002) 1. Compliance with conditions imposed by the ERC 1. The applicant secured a permit and removed the deck on the existing house. 2. Landscaping Plans are forthcoming from the Landscaping Architect, J Edlund 3. The same as Item 2. 4. The applicant is arranging for payment of Transportation Mitigation Fee. 5. The final short plat revised to show an easement across Lot 3 instead of pipestem for Lot 2 6. A note was added to the final short plat map relating the building setbacks. 7. The applicant is arranging for payment of Fire Mitigation Fee. 8. Not applicable. The applicant is securing a Waiver Form for deferring the offsite improvements DATE: TO: ROUTE TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM June 16, 2008 Mike Dotson, Plan Review Kayren Kittrick, Plan Review Carrie Olson, Plan Review UNGSHORTPLATLUA08-002~HPL Attached is the most recent version of the above-referenced short plat. If all review concerns have been addressed, please sign below or return your comments as needed. Thanks. Attachment included: • Letter of Compliance, Waiver of Submittal Requirements, Density Worksheet, Land Scape Drawings, Short Plat drawings Also provide the following information requested by Gregg Zimmermen as requirement of project closeout and signing of short plat mylars. Status Of: A•t•l!lt!I &!!w! NA 1. fr•l•st#s Comments 1. As~Builts Cost Data Inventory Bill of Sale Easements (Water, Sewer, Utilities, Hydrant, etc.) Deed of Dedication Square Footage: 1. Restrictive Covenants 1. Maintenance Bond Release Permit Bond Comments: Approval: ______________ , ___________ , Date: _____ _ Kayren Kittrick Mike Dotson Cc: Yellow File CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: June 16, 2008 Bob Mac Onie, Technical Services Sonja Fesser, Technical Services Carrie Olson, Plan Review x7235 UNG SHORT PLAT LUAOS-002-SHPL AND LEGAL REVIEW Attached is the most recent version of the above-referenced short plat. The following attachments are enclosed for your review: • Letter of Compliance • Lot Closures • Short Plat Certificate • Short Plat drawings If all review concerns have been addressed, please sign below or return your comments as needed. Thanks. Approval: _____________ \ __________ , Date: ____ _ Robert T Mac Onie, Jr. Sonja Fesser Cc: Yellow File I:\PlanRcview\CO!BON\5hortplats 2008\UNG SHPL Olm PR-TS ReviewStvt.doc CONFIRMATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH ALL CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL FOR UNG SHORT PLAT (LUAOS-002) l. Compliance with conditions imposed by the ERC I. The applicant secured a pennit and removed the deck on the existing house. 2. Landscaping Plans are forthcoming from the Landscaping Architect, J EdJund 3. The same as Item 2. 4. The applicant is arranging for payment of Transportation Mitigation Fee. 5. The final short plat revised to show an easement across Lot 3 instead ofpipestem for Lot 2 6. A note was added to the final short plat map relating the building setbacks. 7. The applicant is arranging for payment of Fire Mitigation Fee. 8. Not applicable. The applicant is securing a Waiver Form for deferring the offsite improvements ' UNG SHORT PLAT Lot Closure Calculations Lot name: 1 North: 10753.4313 Line Course: N 89-53-48 W North: 10753. 6457 Line Course: s 01-36-42 W North: 10726. 8963 Line Course: s 21-34-26 W North: 10705.4518 Line Course: s 00-06-12 W North: 10678.6718 Line Course: s 89-53-48 E North: 10678.4445 Line Course: N 01-36-42 E North: 10753.4448 East: 5050. 3967 Length: 118.87 East: 4931.5269 Length: 26.76 East: 4930.7743 Length: 23.06 East: 4922.2951 Length: 26.78 East: 4922. 2468 Length: 126.04 East: 5048.2866 Length: 75.03 East: 5050.3968 Perimeter: 396.55 Area: 9,201 s.f. 0.21 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.0135 Course: N 00-28-40 E Error North: 0.01351 East: 0.00011 Precision 1: 29,361.29 Lot name: 2 North: 10678.6623 East: 4922.2464 Line Course: N 00-06-12 E Length: 26. 78 North: 10705.4423 East: 4922.2947 Line course: N 21-34-26 E Length: 23.06 North: 10726. 8868 East: 4930.7739 Line Course: N 01-36-42 E Length: 26. 76 North: 10753.6362 East: 4931.5265 Line Course: N 89-53-48 W Length: 70.48 North: 10753.7633 East: 4861. 0466 Line Course: s 01-36-42 w Length: 75.03 North: 10678.7630 East: 4858.9364 Line Course: s 89-53-48 E Length: 63.31 North: 10678.6488 East: 4922.2463 Perimeter: 285.43 Area: 5,000 s.f. 0.11 acres Mapcheck Closure~ (Uses Error Closure: 0.0135 Error North: -0.01351 Precision 1: 21,133.56 Page I of3 listed courses, radii, and deltas) Course: S 00-28-40 W East: -0.00011 April 12, 2008 ! • UNG SHORT PLAT Lot Closure Calculations Lot name: 3 North: 10678.7765 Line Course: N 01-36-42 North: 10753.7768 E Line Course: N 89-53-48 W North: 10753. 9621 Line Course: s 12-26-57 E North: 10678.9288 Line Course: s 89-53-48 E North: 10678. 7772 East: 4858.9374 Length: 75.03 East: 4861. 0477 Length: 102.74 East: 4758.3078 Length: 76.84 East: 4774.8725 Length: 84.06 East: 4858.9324 Perimeter: 338.66 Area: 7,005 s.f. 0.16 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.0051 Course: N 82-11-11 W Error North: 0.00070 East: -0.00508 Precision 1: 66,034.10 Lot name: 3a North: 10678.7765 Line Course: N 01-36-42 E North: 10733.7747 Line Course: N 89-53-48 W North: 10733.9510 Line Course: S 12-26-57 E North: 10678.9260 Line Course: S 89-53-48 E North: 10678.7744 East: 4858.9374 Length: 55. 02 East: 4860.4849 Length: 97.76 East: 4762.7250 Length: 56.35 East: 4774. 8726 Length: 84.06 East: 4858.9325 Perimeter: 293.18 Area: 5,000 s.f. 0.11 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed Error Closure: 0.0054 Error North: -0.00214 Precision 1: 54,178.14 Page 2 of3 courses, radii, and deltas) Course: S 66-44-48 W East: -0.00497 April 12, 2008 UNG SHORT PLAT Lot Closure Calculations Lot name: total North: 10753.4313 East: 5050.3967 Line Course: N 89-53-48 W Length: 292. 09 North: 10753.9581 East: 4758.3072 Line Course: s 12-26-57 E Length: 76.84 North: 10678.9248 East: 4774. 8718 Line Course: s 89-53-48 E Length: 273. 41 North: 10678.4317 East: 5048.2814 Line Course: N 01-36-42 E Length: 75.03 North: 10753.4320 East: 5050.3916 Perimeter: 717.36 Area: 21,206 s.f. 0.49 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses Error Closure: 0.0051 Error North: 0.00070 Precision 1: 139,873.27 Page 3 of3 listed courses, radii, and deltas) Course: N 82-11-11 W East: -0.00508 April 12, 2008 ' • Fidelity National Title Company of Washington Underwritten by Fidelity National Title Insurance Company 3500 188th St. SW, Suite 300 Lynnwood, WA 98037 (425)771-3031 I Fax No. (425)670-2109 TO: PREVIEW PROPERTIES, INC 1222 N 185TH #102 SEATILE, WA 98133 Attention: PAK UNG Your Number: Reference Name: UNG OUR NUMBER: 7-07100194 -Short Plat Certificate Dear Sirs: Direct Line: (425)640-3510 Toll Free: 1-800-776-3021 5th Report SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE Premium: Sales Tax: $ 250.00 $ 22.25 In the matter of the above described Short Plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the record of the County Auditor and County Clerk of King County, Washington, and from such examination hereby certifies that: TITLE TO the following described land is vested in: PAK S. UNG and DARA UNG, husband and wife THE LAND is situated in said King County, and is described as follows: See Attached SUBJECT TO the exceptions shown herein. No search has been made as to the taxes and assessments. THIS CERTIFICATE shall have no force or effect except as a basis for the Certificate applied for. Records examined toJune 9, 2008 at 08:00 AM FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON /-,,_£_ By: _____ _::.r ___________ _ Terry Sarver, Chief Title Officer FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON Short Plat Certificate, Page 2 of 3 Title Order Number: 7-07100194 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 5, Block 9, C.D. HILLMAN'$ EARLINGTON GARDENS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE, DIVISION NO. 1, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, Page(s) 74, records of King County, Washington. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON Short Plat Certificate, Page 3 of 3 Title Order Number: 7-07100194 EXCEPTIONS 1. DEED OF TRUST AND ADDITIONAL ADVANCES, IF ANY, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Grantor: Pak S. Ung, Dara Ung, husband and wife Trustee: LS Title of Washington Beneficiary: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ("MERS") as nominee for Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. Original Amount: $262,500.00, plus interest Dated: December 18, 2006 Recorded: December 21, 2006 Recording No.: 20061221001045 2. QUESTION OF THE EXISTENCE OF AN "AUTOMATIC HOMESTEAD": If the subject property is or will be the residence of a marital community, even though the interest therein may be intended to be held as a separate or community interest, execution of the proposed conveyance, contract to convey, or encumbrance must be by both husband and wife by reason of RCW 6.13 which provides for "automatic homestead." EXECUTION UNDER A POWER OF ATTORNEY WILL NOT PROVE ACCEPTABLE UNLESS FIRST APPROVED BY THIS COMPANY. END OF EXCEPTIONS END OF EXCEPTIONS THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER IF WE MAY BE OF FURTHER ASSISTANCE, PLEASE GIVE US A CALL f 'Z '1, SHPL REC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS SHORT PLAT RECORDING City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE: To ensure the proposed land division is in accordance with City of Renton's adopted standmds and consistent with the approved Shon Plat. In addition, final review is used to verify compliance with any required conditions. COMPLETE APPLICATION REQUIRED: In order to accept your application, each of the numbered items must be submitted at the same time. If you have received a prior written waiver of a submittal item(s), please provide the waiver form in lieu of any submittal item not provided. All plans and attachments must be folded to a size not exceeding 81/, by 11 inches. APPL/CAT/ON SCREENING: Applicants are encouraged to bring in one copy of the application package for informal review by staff, prior to making the requested number of copies, colored drawings, or photo reductions. Please allow approximately 45 minutes for application screening. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL HOURS: Applications should be submitted to Development Services staff at the 6th floor counter of Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, between 8:00 A.M. and 4:00 P.M. Monday through Friday. An appointment to submit your application is not necessary. Due to the screening time required, applications delivered by messenger cannot be accepted. All Plans and Attachments must be folded 8 %"b 11" APPLICATION MATERIALS: 1. 2. 3. 4. D D G:a' .ri Public Works Approval: Please provide confirmation that required improvements have either been substantially installed or deferred. Waiver Form: If you received a waiver form, please provide 4 copies of this form. Confirmation of Compliance with all Conditions of Plat Approval: Please provide 4 copies of a statement detailing how all conditions of plat approval have been addressed . Plat Certificate or Title Report: Please provide 3 copies of a current Plat Certificate or Title Report obtained from a title company documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances of the involved parcel(s). The Title Report should include all parcels being developed, but no parcels that are not part of the development. If the Plat Certificate or Title Report references any recorded documents (i.e. easements, dedications, covenants) 4 copies of the referenced recorded document(s) must also be provided. All easements referenced in the Plat Certificate must be located, identified by type and recording number, and dimensioned on the Site Plan. H : \Forms \Pia nn ing\s hpl rec. doc . 1 • 08/07 s. D 6. D JI ~\/;1. D Draft Legal Documents: Please provide 4 copies of any proposed street dedications, restrictive covenants, draft Homeowners Association, or any other legal documents pertaining to the development and use of the property. Additional Requirements for Plats with Private Utility and Access Easements: Short Plats with parcels requiring access via a private easement shall show the locations and widths of these proposed utility and access easements. The following two notes shall be included upon the face of the short plat: • Declaration of Covenant: The owner of land embraced within this short plat, in return for the benefits to accrue from this subdivision, by signing hereon covenants and agrees to convey the beneficial interest in the new easements shown on this short plat to any and all future purchasers of the lots, or of any subdivision thereof. The covenant shall run with the land as shown on this short plat. • Private Access and Utilities Maintenance Agreement: New private exclusive easement for ingress and egress is to be created upon the sale of lots shown on this short plat. The owners of lots shall have an equal and undivided interest in the ownership and responsibility for maintenance of the private access easement appurtenances. These appurtenances and maintenance responsibilities include the repair and maintenance of the private access road, drainage pipes, and storm water quality and/or detention facilities within this easement, private signage, and other infrastructure not owned by the City of Renton or other utility providers. Maintenance costs shall be shared equally. Parking on the paving in the access easement is prohibited, unless pavement width is greater than 20 feet. (NOTE: If only one lot is subject to the agreement, contact the Public Works Department at 425-430-7235 for special language.) Aquifer Protection Notice: For Short Plats within either of the Aquifer Protection Zones, the following notice must be included upon the face of the short plat: The lots created herein fall within Zone (1 or 2) of Renton's Aquifer Protection Area and are subject to the requirements of the City of Renton Ordinance #4367. This City's sole source of drinking water is supplied from a shallow aquifer under the City surface. There is no natural barrier between the water table and ground surface. Extreme care should be exercised when handling of any liquid substance, other than water, to protect from contact with the ground surface. It is the homeowners' responsibility to protect the City's drinking water. Density Worksheet: Please submit 4 copies of a completed density worksheet for all residential projects. Short Plat Plan for Recording: Please provide 4 copies of a fully-dimensioned plan prepared by a State of Washington registered professional land surveyor, drawn at a scale of 1" = 40' on an 18" x 24" plan sheet (or other size or scale approved by the Development Ssrvices Division) and including the following information: V' Name of the proposed plat v" In the upper right hand corner include the City land use file number (e.g. LUA02-037) and below in smaller font, the city LND number provided by the property services section (e.g. LND ) v" Name and address of the licensed land surveyor/engineer ..,--Legal description of the property to be subdivided ,y Date, graphic scale, and north arrow oriented to the top of the paper/plan sheet \Y Location and dimensions of all property lines including the square footages of each lot v' Location of the subject site with respect to the nearest street intersections (including driveways and/or intersections opposite the subject property), ,/ alleys and other rights of way Names, locations, types, widths and other dimensions of existing and proposed streets alleys, easements, parks, open spaces and reservations H:\Forms\Planning\shplrec.doc -2 - t 08107 ( 10.0 ~ 110 vV 15. o <:i( 16. O \)\,(11. 0 / Data sufficient to readily determine and reproduce on the ground the location, bearing and length of every street, easement line, lot line and boundary line on site. Dimensions shall be to the nearest one-hundredth (1/100) of a foot, angles, bearing, degrees, minutes and seconds. All measurements and bearings shall be mathematically correct /. Coordinates shall be included per City of Renton surveying standards for permanent control monuments · ~ Location and dimensions of all easements referenced in the plat certificate with the recording number and type of easement (e.g. access, sewer, etc.) indicated ,.,... Location and dimensions of any existing structures to remain within or abutting the plat ,; Location of existing conditions on or adjacent to the site, which could hinder development. Certifications: ,,,.., Certification by a licensed land surveyor that a survey has been made and that monuments and stakes will be set V Certification of City approval to be signed by the Planning/Building/ Public Works Administrator • Certification of approval to be signed by King County Assessor and the Deputy King County Assessor Landscape Plan, Detailed: Please provide 3 copies of a Landscaping Plan (Detailed) meeting the requirements of RMC 4-8-1200. Irrigation Sprinkler Plan: Please provide 3 copies of an Irrigation Plan meeting the requirements of 4-8-120D. Wetland Mitigation Plan: (Only for projects with wetlands). Please provide 3 copies of a Final Mitigation Plan meeting the requirements of RMC 4-8-120D. Stream and Lake Mitigation Plan: (Only for projects with streams/lakes). Please provide 3 copies of a plan meeting the requirements of RMC 4-8-1200. Calculations: Please provide 3 copies of complete field calculations and computations noted for the plat and details (if any) of all distances, angles, and calculations together with information on the error of closure. The error of closure on any traverse shall not exceed 1' in 10,000'. Monument Cards: When a monument(s) is installed as part of the project, please provide 2 copies of a form obtained from the City Technical Services Division and filled out by a surveyor providing information regarding a single monument, including the Section, Township and Range, method of location. type of mark found or set, manner of re-establishment of the single monument (if applicable), description, and a drawing showing the location of a single monument and indicating a reference point to that monument. Proof of Improvement Deferral or Installation: Please provide 3 copies of the Improvement Deferral Form located in the Customer Service Center on the 61 " Floor of Renton City Hall. Any deferrals of improvements must be approved by the Development Services Director prior to the recording of the short plat. Deed of Right-of-Way Dedication: If any public right-of-way is required for your project, please provide 3 copies of a draft deed of right-of-way dedication. H : \Forms \P Ian n in g \s hplrec. doc -3 -08107 18.0 Plan Reductions: Please provide one 8 'h" x 11" hoto a ic reduction of all required full size plan sheets, which include: Ian scape pans, conceptual utility plans, s1 e plan or plat plan, neighborhood detail map, topography map, tree cutting/land clearing plan, grading plan, and building elevations. These reductions are used to prepare public notice posters and to provide the public with information about the project. A photographic reduction is a photo quality (not transparent) copy of a digitally scanned original document. Copy machine reductions or plotted reductions cannot be accepted. Please ensure the reduced Neighborhood Detail Map is legible and will display enough cross streets to easily identify the project location when cropped to fit in a 4" by 6" public notice space. Once the photographic reductions have been made, please also make one 8 'h" x 11" regular photocopy of each photographic reduction sheet. Royal Reprographics (425)-251-8230, The Copy Company (206) 622-4050, and Reprographics NW/Ford Graphics (206)-624-2040, (425) 883-1110, (253) 383-6363 provide this service All Plans and Attachments must be folded to 8%" by 11" REVIEW PROCESS: Once the final short plai information is submitted to the Development Services Division, the materials will be routed to those City departments having an interest in the application. Reviewers have approximately two weeks to return their comments to the Development Services Division. All comments and any requests for revisions will be sent to the applicant. Once all comments have been addressed, the applicant re-submits the revised plans and/or documents for review. As part of the review process, the Development Services Division will ensure improvements have been installed and approved and that all conditions of the short plat approval have been met. Once the applicant has demonstrated these items have been addressed through either a confirmation of improvement installation approval or letter of deferral, the City will send a written request for the final mylar, courier fees and any associated legal documents. Once all of the City's required approval signatures have been obtained, the City will transmit the mylar via courier to King County for recording. The entire recording process typically takes four weeks to complete. However, the time frame for getting a short plat recording is largely dependent upon application completeness and prompt turnaround time for revisions. Lots cannot legally be sold until the Short Plat has received its recording number. DEFERRAL OF IMPROVEMENTS: If a developer wishes to defer certain on-site or off-site improvements (i.e. landscaping, curbs and sidewalks), written application with full and complete engineering drawings must be submitted to the Development Services Division. The application should explain the reasons why such delay is necessary. If approval is granted, security in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, set-aside fund, assignment of funds, certified check or other type of security acceptable to the City shall be furnished to the City in an amount equal to a minimum of 150% of the estimated cost of the required improvements. · · DEDICATION OF RIGHT OF WAY: If right-of-way dedication is required for the short plat, separate application for City approval is required. The associated deed of right-of-way dedication must be approved by City Council prior to recording of the short plat. This process may take six weeks, so early application is encouraged. H:\Forms\Planning\shplrec.doc • 4 • 08107 lEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVEk OF SUBMITTAL REQUIRt:IVIENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS i'/l1rli!J!lillil~llfftj1lllll11Jlt11llll l!lll}llll!.llllllii,lf Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis , g1§nliillifiri~iiM~~1it1i:fi2i21ir;11Jf;;1ii~1,1l/ii2i;11111l;1;111 Preapplication Meeting Summary 4 ii?.iw,~j;1iwBy~f:~irmiiI1fi@rrJi"lrlM!i1t1mrfaiif11\i! Rehabilitation Plan 4 iiSti!i:l!1~ti11f.itfif~/0f:li11Il~]i~llilfiil!/lf:¥!/r7JJJJ;Nt1/ili~l;¥.J!i!H*if.ffjJfili&l!f.1f:J Site Plan , AND, §~Im 9~i~if~!§I11i1''.§r~nE¥iii11:111~11 i:1'1l11mi1!11iM~r' Stream or Lake Study, Supplemental 4 §ii!li?r&iR.ililli!.t1rrilll¥;/ im11'.ii!l'.!'1ll!!ii!I!!i1lill! Street Profiles 2 Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan 4 gii11at~~riw';ia!~in194!iiiI~lflwCtil1Jtr~i!@11Jl;r Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 iiinl;@!fli!i?rl il111111iffl'i!l'l'i1Cii!1!1iii!!i!'i!ii!1 Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary 4 ii~B ~1m1?11ffil!liil~I11;1 111;11111irt1i1!!@1@ril Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 Map of View Area 2 AND, Photosimulations 2 AND, This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: _.,_r°_A¥----'-_StmZ--r..c__ _ ___,_'f'_LA'l __ _ 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Development Planning Section DATE: -----1~-;._..µ£-"'--l,;'-"'-o-'--t ___ _ Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Forms\Ptanning\waiverofsubmittalreqs_9-06.xls 09/06 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISI WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS ~r~ir1li1111i\;;;i:11a1111111i11111;1ii ;tiaiw, ,~ ~i1111~11i::1111111i:1i:1t1:r1i1,:i111111it1,ii~:1,1i~111i;;~i;.1,,1:, Calculations, ~iI\1Itt!g;:~g~itgrifJJ,~g!~Yiii,t1i11@li;1$@1lti1t'iil1!1i;1t11',!1ri; Construction Mitigation Description ,AND• Environmental Checklist • li*lijp~:fr•!!~~~,if{!J~\j/~,~~t~;j:\1;;iJ'i,\ifi\!¥i11tf Existing Easements (Recorded Copy), titlsltilili!l\11ii!l 111 1!llllli!1!111!1I1if i1'~11l!ll1llll!!!!f /1iii!t Floor Plans , AND, i§./illtirtl~l\~~llP~~gqt:,;11;lJ!ll!!'1l@!1llliifflilll!!liJ]!lj Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 ii~1l;En119i111!11ii~iiiliiJJ11i1111i'1i11i;:;1ii!iii1i111;11"1miir Habitat Data Report 4 lmirltmKI l\lfil'~'.J 11:;11:111iir1ri1wIIl!;llJlf I!!!fl111IiI Irrigation Plan 4 Legal Description , w1;;1;1~min~!rfillfl!ill,B~111i111111,I i 11111'II111 Mailing Labels for Property Owners , ~;t1!9re111na iii q;;1,1ql/J 11;1irnr11 ;; i1 111\!i'iil Master Application Form, ie~Ii~n1i§~t4~{1~Jlrro9ml5lri~1111r,i1;11:1rm11J!@ Neighborhood Detail Map 4 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Development Planning Section PROJECT NAME: ~f'.P;t-~~SH(;(z;{~~__,f.__LA"J~ DATE: --""-0+-'/ (_:r_,_/ (),~"'----/ Q:\WE8\PW\DEVSERV\Forms\Planning\waiverofsubmittalreqs_9·06.xls 09/06 DENSITY WORKSHEET City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98055 Phone:425-430-7200 Fax 425-430-7231 1. Gross area of property: 1 21 194 square feet 2. Deduction: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. Public street** -----square feet Private access easements** Critical Areas* 0 square feet ----- -----square feet Total excluded area: 2 square feet 3. Subtract Line 2 from line 1 for net area: 3 21 194 square feet 4. Divide lien 3 by 43,560 for net acreage 4 0.487 acres 5. Number of dweHing units or lots planned 5 ---~3 unit/lots 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density 6 --~6=·~17~ du/acre * Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways" Critical Areas buffers are not deducted/excluded. ** Alleys (public or private) donor have to be excluded, Project: Pak Ung Short Plat Date 10-Jun-08 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: April 14, 2008 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: LUA (file) Number: Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Acceptance Date: Applicant: Owner: Contact: PID Number: ERC Decision Date: ERC Appeal Date: Administrative Approval: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Mylar Recording Number: Ung Short Plat LUA-08-002, SHPL-A Andrea Petzel January 16, 2008 Pak & Dara Ung Same Dan Touma, Touma Engineers & Surveyors 3340401435 February 20, 2008 March 4, 2008 Date: Date: Project Description: Applicantion for administrative short plat review for a three-lot subdivision of a 21,193 SF parcel in the R-8 zone. The existing 978 SF house would remain. Residential density would be 6.12 du/ac. Lots 2 and 3 would be accessed from Davis Ave. S. and Lot 1 would be accessed from Shattuck Ave. S. Proposed lot sizes would be 9,208, 7,004 and 5,000 SF. There are 10 significant trees onsite; the applicant proposes to retain 1. The parcel has sensitive slopes onsite, but per the geotechnical report submitted by the applicant there are no critical areas resent. Location: 1517 Shattuck Avenue S Comments: PARTIES OF RECORD UNG SHORT PLAT LUA08-002, SHPL-A Dan Touma Touma Engineer & Surveyors 6632 s 191st Place ste: #E-102 Kent, WA 98032 tel: (425) 251-0665 eml: mhtouma@aol.com ( contact) John G. DuBois PO Box 1187 Renton, WA 98057-1187 tel: (425) 255-1884 (party of record) Updated: 01/30/08 Pak & Dara Ung 1222 N 185th Street ste: #102 Seattle, WA 98133 tel: (206) 542-2171 (owner/ applicant) Irene Robbins 17207 NE 7th Place Bellevue, WA 98008 tel: (425) 641-4358 (party of record) Kraig L. Carrere 1530 Davis Avenue S Renton, WA 98055 tel: ( 425) 277-9250 (party of record) (Page 1 of 1) o~~Y ~~ CITY F RENTON .,~ .... + ~~~ Denis Law, Mayor ?[iN'1'0 April 1, 2008 Dan Touma Touma Engineers & Surveyors 6632 S 191 st Place #E-102 Kent, WA 98032 SUBJECT: Ung Short Plat LUA08-002, SHPL-A Dear Mr. Touma: Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator As staled in my previous correspondence, please find enclosed comments from the City's Property Services Department. These comments will guide you in the preparation of the Short Plat for recording. I am again enclosing the handout titled "Short Plat Recording" which provides detailed information for the short plat process for recording The project manager that was assigned to the above referenced project is no longer with the City of Renton; therefore, if you have any questions please contact the Planning Manager, Jennifer Henning at (425) 430-7286. For questions regarding the recording process for the short plat, as well as for submitting revised plans, you may contact Carrie Olson at (425) 430-7235. Sincerely, ~~ ~cyMG7u~ker Planning Division Secretary Enclosures cc: Pak & Dara Ung/ Owner(s) Kraig L. Carrere, John G. Dubois, Irene Robbins/ Party(ies) of Record -------10-55-So_u_th_G_r_ad_y_W_a_y_-~R-en-to_n_, W_as_h_in-gt-on-98-0-57 ______ ~ @ This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM March 12, 2008 Sonja J. Fesser~rfjf Ung Short Plat, LUA-08-002-SHPL Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced short plat submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant: None. Information needed for final short plat approval includes the following: Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA-08-002-SHPL and LND-20-0514, respectively, on the drawing in the spaces already provided. Provide short plat and lot closure calculations. Include a north arrow and scale for the vicinity map. Rename the "CERTIFICATION" block to OWNERS' DECLARATION. Said change is a better match for the text that follows. Insert the names of the two property owners, instead of "NAME", under the signature lines "REC. #980903900", which is shown within the lower notary block (left-hand side of drawing), needs to be moved as needed. See the attachment for letters ("M" and "i") that need to be moved to be legible. Said letters fall within the dividing line between the "RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE" block and the "LAND SURVEYORS'CERTIFICATE" block. \H:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-20 -Short Plats\0514\RV080305.doc March 3 1, 2008 Page 2 The "APPROVALS" block for the City of Renton is in error. Include the "CITY OF RENTON" in the title. The only city official signing this short plat submittal is the Administrator of Public Works (note this change in title on the submittal). There is no "Manager of Building & Land Development Division" or "Development Engineer". Include "KING COUNTY" in the "DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS" block. NOTE: There should be a dividing line separating the City of Renton approvals block from the King County approvals block. NOTE: The scale shown for this drawing is "l "=50"'(noted just above the "SURVEY NOTES" block). It should be noted as l "=40'. The symbol shown in the "LEGEND" block, which represents what was set at the corners of the proposed lots, is not shown on the short plat drawing. Do show said corners with said symbol. Note all easements, covenants and agreements of record on the drawing, if any. Note the plat name of the properties to the north and south of the subject parcel on the short plat drawing. The addresses for the proposed lots arc as follows: Lot 1 is 1517 Shattuck Ave S, Lot 2 is 1522 Davis Ave Sand Lot 3 is 1526 Davis Ave S. Note said addresses on the short plat drawing. Remove the building setbacks noted in the "SETBACKS" block. Setbacks will be determined at the time that building permits are issued. Remove all references to zoning, density, "OWNER" block and "ENGINEER/ SURVEYOR" block. See the attachments for additional corrections needed to the "LEGEND", "SURVEY NOTES" and "SHORT PLAT DATA" blocks. The "SURVEY NOTES" block includes errors in the description of Mon #476, which has led to errors in the City of Renton inverse distance and bearing. Also, the surveyor prorated the lot distances. What is the basis for this proration, (calculated or located monuments to the south have not been noted)? The proration could be explained with a "NTS" detail. Add basis of horizontal datum (COR Mons #476 and #659 from the City of Renton Control Book, etc). Note all dimensions for the individual lots in a uniform text size (short plat drawing). Add the feet symbol (') to the lengths noted in the "LINE TABLE" block. Note that if there are easements, restrictive covenants or agreements to others (City of Renton, etc.) as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the short plat. The short plat submittal and the associated document(s) arc to be given to the Project Manager as a package. The recording number(s) for the associated document(s) should be referenced on the short plat drawing. H:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-20 -Short Plats\05 l4\RV080305.doc\cor March 31, 2008 Page 3 Fee Review Comments: The Fee Review Sheet for this review of the preliminary short plat is provided for your use and information. II:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-20 -Shott Plats\0514\RV080305.doc\cor SCALE: "° I 80 i I 160 I PORTION OF NW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SEC 19, TWN 23 N, RG 5 E, W. 0 0 IL STATION 1C1UAL N ~ND ANGLES IO io ¥' 0 0 z CR MON # 475(./ aTY or RENTON MON 1659 y· FOUND BRASS PIN IN CONC. FOUND 1 /2" PIN IN IN PIPE INlER. Of' S PUGET DR & CONCRElE IN CASE BENSON DR S (5/05) NTER. SHATTUCK AVE S N • 173222.6096 /:'" ...-- AND S 15th SlRE~04/05) E = 1300447.8845 v ( ~ : g~~ Z9l/, r,3 El = as.48· ....----fvrw'I-l~ R Co,•"J""& EL -132.86 ,.,..-· .::znk/MIIUI~&" ~~ .,, I( -~ f7 I • , -~l+-&,-,F~.L..1189'1"" la'W. ~ ~hi:::. //63, 7 3 '-? kic~r!...Zi ---:A'nev~ mu-,f>C(rC T/6.,, 7C>' l~~ I 1-~"°"le:. ~ WM.fr, +i,,-.,? ~ '11'/W..~ O'NHER [ 11 Pf<K ONG . 11. "39332 47:JW ,\¥!!:-"Ne' ..sEAIJl E, WAiM'llll.TON QS1ie- .;.ags & 10 -0W1 I j : ~I~ -1 ~ ~,g :x:: a b (.) q LOT 1 LOT 2 WA-94-151-SHPL I ~ I~ -1 ~. I (') # 9511079004 ~ LOT3 J I '° _ 30.01_ \j f:l~GIN!!ft t SUffvt:>fSR ~-·&-t"Affl) SUR\Ji¥0RS ... ~,S...+etst PLACE ·StJJiE"E :.:.102 .~; ~Sl'IINGTO~ 98032' ~-~--0665 SHORT PLAT DATA TOTAL SHORT PLAT ARE4~sq. ft. NUMBER OF LOTS PROP~ :lel•E -= 1'!•8 SMALL LOT AREA = 5000 sq. ft. OEHSIT'f • 6.86 fll:1/ACRi f.::::t. PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE O~~JLOTS . 1-9,208sf. 2 -7,004 s. f. (Net 5,000 s.f.) 3 -. 5,000 s. f. ·SElBAeKS; FR8HT 28 FT. RiAR • 26 P"f. SIPli: ¥ARB -~. ~ f NW.~/4 LEGEND $ EX MON IN CASE • SURFACE BRASS MONUMENT O FOUND REBAR CAP OR IRON P~ ..,,,......,.. • SET 1 /2" 'AB LS #94 "=4' )i( FND PK NAIL . + SECTION CORNER , c::():J 7/4 CORNER (f) " Fl OL-t· V1W\CrA~,·er.,. FOUND PK ANO SHINER / 0.05' NORlH OF LINE r-b 0 g ~ ts:SI SCALE 1"~1 t401 SURVEY NOTES · ·7 INSTRUMENT: TOPCON GPT 3000W TOTAL STATION METHOD USED: FlaD TRAVERSE WITH ACTUAL \ . -r~ao MEASUREMENTS AND ANGL£l flleettf'IJ f'lrt-.i.eu>Atf ~. t,t" WAC 332-130-090 DA 1E cff:-SUR : APRIL 2005 BASIS OF BEARING: S 15th STREET (N 89"53'48"W) S 15TH STREET L"" Pfe.r> N89'53' 48"W (BASIS CE BEARING) 410.11 (M) 410.00' (P) g g 3 3 0 0 I() 0 'SI" w : C\I r) io I !fl 0 0 z I I\ ·. r--. . ---r ,r t . I I I I ~I l ~oo· ·111. ' \ I I I I \ I REN SPLflalf-791 ?912111900&5 / I , 4 ~ \ \ A I B I C l I I 2 I ~ '~\o~---~----·~----~------J 'o ~ l =~ ~ \ ~ (fl\ i ~\ ,n , --------------~ D •--;--, o/ t ,!: • I C'S er, i ~ ~ {I~ <( ..,, (/) 0 ~ gl . u ~ ii ~ It) <( , ... -.-' ~ ' PROPERTY SERVICES fEE REVIEW NO. 2008-o.4 · ~ This feereview"*fe':'~'1,~t~4 :~l?,f?!l~\lhlf·'"-·"'-·•e-" '""'""--;;-;;-""'""dated APPUCANT: I Uf....l<§ ,-PAK &-~. . . .1 RECEIVED FROM: I . )OB AODRESS: r··l 517 8" lt~A~-""TTT :!:!~'~ _, ,~_,.:=·==:::;:==:::::=::·::···::··=··· =·····=··=···=··:::·::··· :::-:::-·:::·-::~-:::--::: .. :; .. _··--;::··-::-:: .. :: ... :: .. :: .. ::_::_:;:_::: .. :: .. ::·=·=··=·=··=·-=::-;::-::·::;· NATUREOFWORK: 1 ..... .-::.:rr.:: ,-...... , A..,.(,·;,,~_-__ ---::;:,,:;....;..·,···1 !LNDNo. I eo·oa,4 I SUBJECT PROPERTY PARENT PIO No(s): _--:t, > • -A-; -1455 jc. \ ·····-· n' .. m 0 DIST. No. PARCEL No. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT NO.OF UNITS AMOUNT 0SAD D LATECOMER D D D 0SAD D LATECOMER D D D 0SAD D LATECOMER D D D 0SAD D LATECOMER D D D 0SAD D LATECOMER D D D JOINT USE AGREEMENT (METRO) D D D - WATER' ., ~/:·/L·'/1< :-_:,YJ::: -:: -.- WASTEWATER' METER SIZE Water Service Fee Amount Fire Service Fee Amounttx Wastewater Fee Amount 5/8" x %'' $2,236 $292 $1,591 I" $5,589 $729 $3.977 1Y2" $11,179 $1,458 $7.954 2" $17,886 $2,332 $12,726 3" $35,711 $4,665 $25,452 4" $55,893 $7,288 $39,768 6" $111,786 $14,577 $79,537 8" $178,857 $23,323 $127,258 a Actual fee \·viii be based on total of new meters minus total credit of existing meters b Based upon the size of the fire service (NOT detector bypass meter) c Unless a sf'parate fire service is provided, the System Developmf'nt Charge(s) shall be based upon the size of the meter installed and a separate fire service fee will not be chan?ed. New Single Family Residential (SFR)" $1,012/unit x Addition of;.:: 500 sf to existing SfRaP $0.405/sq ft of new impervious area x All Other Uses' $0.405/sq ft of new impervious area x a Includes mobile home d,._vellings and manufactured homes Fee shall not be greater than $1,012 Fee shall not be less than $1,012 ' Si~tun{Ji/ Reviewing Authority ··,"·•···--~·::.:.•: No. OF UNITS/ SQ. FTG. SDC FEE .. - • It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice, that the quoted fees may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements (i.e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. • The quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits, r/w permit fees, the cost of water meters, or traffic benefit fees. • If subject property is within an LID, it is the developer's responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. • Please note that these fees arc subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of requirement to pay per Ordinance. EFFECTIVE: January 14, 2008 P: \Administrative\ Forms\ FeeReview \ 2008f eeRvw .doc 0 City o nton Department of Planning! Building! Pu Vorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT PROPERTY SVCS APPLICATION NO: LUA08-002, SHPL-A APPLICANT:_ Pak & Dana Uno PROJECT TITLE: Unq Short Plat SITE AREA: 21,193 sauare feet LOCATION: 1517 Shattuck Avenue S COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 30, 2008 DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 16, 2008 PLANNER: Andrea Petzel PLAN REVIEWER: Mike Dotson BUILDING AREA lnross): 978 sauare feet WORK ORDER NO: 77858 --. . . -'"'"'-·' Vt:D ,i}-l..{f-i/V I ' . Ii zoos Ci1t"m,Jl()r,R~. " SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicantion for administrative short plat review for a three-lot subdivision of a 21,193 SF parcel in the R-8 zone. The existing 978 SF house would remain. Residential density would be 6.12 du/ac. Lots 2 and 3 would be accessed from Davis Ave. S. and Lot 1 would be accessed from Shattuck Ave. S. Proposed lot sizes would be 9,208, 7,004 and 5,000 SF. There are 1 O significant trees onsite; the applicant proposes to retain 1. The parcel has sensitive slopes onsite, but per the geotechnical report submitted by the applicant there are no critical areas present. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minar Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housma Air Aesthetics Water Lioht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Ufililies Animals Transnortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feel B. POL/CY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date o~~Y ~~ + >+-+ ;1l ~ ~ Denis Law, Mayor ~N'1'0 March 17, 2008 Dan Touma Touma Engineer & Surveyors 6632 S 191 st Place #E-102 Kent, WA 98032 SUBJECT; Ung Short Plat LUAOS-002, SHPL-A Dear Mr. Towna: CITY ~F RENTON Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator This letter is to inform you that the appeal period ended March 4, 2008 for the Administrative Short Plat approval. No appeals were filed. This decision is final and you may proceed with the next step of the short plat process. The enclosed handout, titled "Short Plat Recording," provides detailed information for this process. The advisory notes and conditions listed in the City of Renton Report & Decision dated February 19, 2008 must .be satisfied before the short plat can be recorded. In addition, comments received from the Property Services Department in regard to the final plat submittal will be forwarded for your consideration once tl1ey become available. These comments will guide you in the preparation of the Short Plat for recording. If you have any questions regarding the report and decision issued for this short plat proposal, please call me at ( 425) 430-7270. For questions regarding the recording process for the short plat, as well as for submitting revised plans, you may contact Carrie Olson at (425) 430-7235. Sincerely, Associate Planner Enclosure(s) cc: Pak & Dara Ung/ Owner(s) Kraig L. Carrere, John G. Dubois, Irene Robbins/ Party(ies) of Record -------10-55-So_u_th_Grad __ y_W_a_y7 --R-en-to_n_, W-as-hm-. -gt-on-98-0-57 _______ ~ . ~ AHEAD OF THE CURVE ~ This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer REPORT & DECISION A. REPORT DA TE: Project Name Owner/Applicant! Contact: File Number Project Description Project Location Project Location Map City of Renton Deparlment of Planning I Building I Public Work ADMIN/STRA TIVE SHORT PLAT REP SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: February 19, 2008 Ung Short Plat Owner: Pak and Dara Ung 1222 N. 1851 " Street, Suite 102 Seattle, WA 98133 LUA 08-002, SHPL-A Contact: Dan Touma, Touma Engineers 6632 S. 191'1 Place E-102 Kent, WA 98032 Project Manager Andrea Petzel, Associate Planner Application for administrative short plat review for a three-lot subdivision of a 21,194 SF parcel in the R-8 zone. The existing 978 SF house would remain. Residential density would be 6.12 du/ac. Lots 2 and 3 would be accessed from Davis Ave. S. and Lot 1 would be accessed from Shattuck Ave. S. Proposed net lot sizes would be 9,208 SF {Lot 1 ), 5,000 SF (Lot 2), and 5,000 SF (Lot 3). There are 10 significant trees onsite; the applicant proposes to retain one. The parcel has sensitive slopes onsite, but the geotechnical report submitted by the applicant indicates no critical areas onsite. 1517 Shattuck Avenue South REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning I Building I Public Works & DECISION ADMINISTRATIVE SHORT PLAT REPORT & DECISION A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: REPORT DA TE: February 19, 2008 Project Name Ung Short Plat Owner/Applicant/ Contact: Owner: Pak and Dara Ung 1222 N. 185'" Street, Suite 102 Contact: Dan Touma, Touma Engineers 6632 S. 191'1 Place E-102 Seattle, WA 98133 Kent, WA 98032 Fife Number LUA 08-002, SHPL-A I Project Manager I Andrea Petzel, Associate Planner Project Description Application for administrative short plat review for a three-lot subdivision of a 21,194 SF parcel in the R-8 zone. The existing 978 SF house would remain. Residential density would be 6.12 du/ac. Lots 2 and 3 would be accessed from Davis Ave. S. and Lot 1 would be accessed from Shattuck Ave. S. Proposed net lot sizes would be 9,208 SF (Lot 1 ), 5,000 SF (Lot 2), and 5,000 SF (Lot 3). There are 10 significant trees onsite; the applicant proposes to retain one. The parcel has sensitive slopes onsite, but the geotechnical report submitted by the applicant indicates no critical areas onsite. Project Location 1517 Shattuck Avenue South Project Location Map City of Renton P/B/PW Department Ung Short Plat, LUA 08-002, SHPL·A Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED February 19, 2008 B. GENERAL IN FORMATION: 1. 2. Owners of Record: Zoning Designation: Pak and Dara Ung Residential -8 du/ac (R-8) 3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Residential Single Family (RSF) 4. Existing Site Use: One single-family home 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Single Family Residential (R-8 zone) East: Single Family Residential (R-8 zone) South: Single Family Residential (R-8 zone) West: Single Family Residential (R-8 zone) 6. Access: Off Shattuck Avenue South and Davis Avenue South 7. Site Area: 21,194 SF (0.49 acres) C. HISTORICAUBACKGROUND: Action Annexation Comprehensive Plan Zoning D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities Land Use File No. N/A N/A N/A Ordinance No. 1597 5099 5100 Date 6/5/56 11/1/04 11/1/04 Water: There is an existing 8-inch watermain in both Shattuck Avenue South and Davis Avenue South. Sewer: There is an existing 8-inch sanitary sewer main adjacent and available to serve the site. Page 2 Surface Water: Storm drainage pipelines and a ditched storm water conveyance system exist along the roadway. 2. Streets: There is currently a paved and partially improved public right-of-way along both frontages of this site. 3. Fire Protection: City of Renton Fire Department E. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. Environmental Review This short plat was exempt from SEPA Environmental Review. 3. Staff Review Comments Representatives from various City departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 4. Consistency Short Plat Criteria Approval of a plat is based upon several factors. The following short plat criteria have been established to assist decision-makers in the review of the plat: a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation The site is designated Residential Single Family (RSF) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Applicable sections of the Comprehensive Plan include the Land Use Element and the Community Design Element. Lands in the RSF designation are intended for use as quality residential detached development organized into neighborhoods at urban densities. It is intended City of Renton P/B/PW Department Ung Short Plat, LUA 08-002, SH PL-A Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED February 19, 2008 Page 3 that larger subdivision, infill development, and rehabilitation of existing housing be carefully designed to enhance and improve the quality of single-family living environments. The proposal is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Community Design Element policies: Policy LU-147. Net development densities should fall within a range of 4.0 to 8.0 dwelling units per acre in Residential Single Family neighborhoods. / Policy Objective Met :J Not Met Policy LU-148. A minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet should be allowed on in-fill parcels of less than one acre (43,560 sq. ft.) in single-family designations. Allow a reduction on lot size to 4,500 square feet on parcels greater than one acre to create an incentive for aggregation of land. The minimum Jot size is not intended to set the standard for density in the designation, but to provide flexibility in subdivision/plat design and facilitate development within the allowed density range. / Policy Objective Met L Not Met Policy LU-152. Single-family Jot size, lot width, setbacks, and impervious surface should be sufficient to allow private open space, landscaping to provide buffers/privacy without extensive fencing, and sufficient area for maintenance activities. / Policy Objective Met n Not Met Policy LU-154. Interpret development standards to support new plats and infill project designs incorporating street locations, lot configurations, and building envelopes that address privacy and quality of life for existing residents. / Policy Objective Met :J Not Met Policy CD-12. Infill development, defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be encouraged in order to add variety, updated housing stock, and new vitality to neighborhoods. / Policy Objective Met D Not Met b) Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation The allowed density range in the R-8 zone is a minimum of 4.0 to a maximum of 8.0 dwelling units per acre. The proposal for three lots on 0.49 acres arrives at a density of 6.12 dwelling units per acre, which falls within the permitted density range for the R-8 zone. RMC 4-7-200F states "pipestems may be permitted for new plats to achieve the minimum density the Zoning Code when there is no other feasible alternative to achieving the minimum density." In this case, the applicant has not demonstrated that the pipestem is required to achieve minimum density. The area of the pipestem is approximately 1,955 SF, which, when subtracted from the gross square footage leaves 19,188 SF (0.44 acres). With an access easement rather than a pipestem, net density would be 6.82 du/ac. Because the applicant can achieve minimum density without a pipestem lot, staff recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant resubmit a short plat plan without a pipestem for Lot 2. Instead, access to the interior lot shall be a shared access easement across Lot 3. Vehicular access to both lots 2 and 3 shall be via this shared private access easement. The allowed building lot coverage for lots over 5,000 square feet in size in the R-8 zone is 35 percent or 2,500 square feet, whichever is greater. Lots 2 and 3 appear to have adequate space to allow for new homes to be built and lot coverage would be verified at the time of building permit review. The existing house that would remain on Lot 1 would have lot coverage of 11 %, which falls within the allowable lot coverage requirements. The required setbacks in the R-8 zone are as follows: front yard is 15 feet for the primary structure and 20 feet for an attached garage, side yard is 5 feet, side yard along a street (including the access easement) is 15 feet for the primary structure and 20 feet for an attached garage and the rear yard is 20 feet. For the two new houses, compliance with setback requirements would be verified at the time of building permit review. The applicant has proposed to remove the existing deck on proposed Lot 1 so that the existing house would comply with all setback requirements. Staff recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant obtain the appropriate permits and remove the deck prior to recording the short plat. City of Renton P/B/PW Department Ung Short Plat, LUA 08-002, SHPL-A Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED February 19, 2008 Page 4 The parking regulations require that detached or semi-attached dwellings provide a minimum of two off-street parking spaces. As proposed, each lot would have adequate area to provide two off- street parking spaces. Compliance with the parking requirements will be verified at the time of building permit review. c) Community Assets The entire site is vegetated primarily with shrubs and ornamental landscaping around the existing residence. There are 1 O significant trees onsite, of which the applicant proposes to retain one, a 14" cherry tree in the southeast corner of proposed Lot 3. The project's tree retention rate would be 10%; Renton Municipal Code requires 30% tree retention. The City's landscaping regulations require the installation of landscaping within the public right-of- way. The minimum amount of landscaping required for sites abutting a non-arterial public street is 5 feet. The landscaping proposed shall either consist of drought resistant vegetation or shall be irrigated appropriately. In addition, the applicant will be required to plant two ornamental trees, a minimum caliper of 1-1 /2 inches (deciduous) or 6 -8 feet in height (conifer), within the 15-foot front yard setback area for the proposed lots. Existing landscaping may be used to augment the required landscaping. A conceptual landscape plan was submitted with the application, indicating the required landscape strip along both street frontages, as well as the required two trees in each front yard. The applicant is proposing to retain only one tree, rather than the three that are required (to meet a 30% retention rate); therefore, 24 caliper inches must be planted as replacement. Replacement trees must have a minimum 2-inch caliper. The applicant has proposed 8 Acer tataricum, with a 1 Y,-inch caliper. This does not meet requirements for the amount of replacement or the size of the replacement trees. Additional landscaping includes hairy manzanita, cistus, salal and sword fern. All plants appear to be drought tolerant, so no irrigation plan is required. Therefore, staff recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant submit a revised, detailed landscape plan and tree retention plan prior to the issuance of any building permit applications. The applicant must either preserve additional trees, or plant 24 caliper inches of replacement trees. Each tree must be a 2-inch minimum caliper. All landscaping shall be installed prior to the issuance of occupancy for the buildings. If applicable, fence details should be included in the landscape plan. Allowable fence height is 48" in the front yard (42" in clear vision areas), and 72" in the rear and side yards. Side yards begin fifteen feet back from the front property line. d) Compliance with Subdivision Regulations Streets: No new public streets would be created as part of the proposed short plat. Shattuck Avenue South and Davis Avenue South are classified as a Collector Streets on the City's Street Map. Both Davis and Shattuck Avenue South are unimproved, and the applicant is required to install 5-foot curb, gutter and sidewalk, curb cuts, paving, and storm drainage facilities along the full frontage of Shattuck Avenue S. Five feet of right-of-way dedication along Shattuck Avenue S. is required, as well as dedication for: et1Fb : etHFA, sbu:•8 FSM, I/!, 8A8 lemding at tl:;le co:: :e: of 31 :attock- aAd 3. ~e,lh Place. The proposed short plat is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the City's street system. In order to mitigate transportation impacts, staff recommends a condition of approval be placed on the project requiring a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net new average daily trip attributed to the two new lots. The fee for the proposed short plat is estimated at $717.75 ($75.00 x 9.57 trips x 2 lots= $1,435.50) and is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. Blocks: No new blocks will be created as part of the proposed short plat. Lots: The size, shape, orientation, and arrangement of the proposed lots comply with the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations and the development standards of the R-8 zone. As proposed, each of the lots would have direct access to a public street via a private driveway. Lot 1 has an existing private driveway off of Shattuck Avenue South. The applicant proposed Lot 2 as a pipestem lot from Davis Avenue South, and Lot 1 would have a separate curb cut directly off Davis Avenue South. City of Renton P/B/PW Department Ung Short Plat, LUA 08-002, SHPL-A Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED February 19, 2008 Page 5 The minimum lot size in the R-8 zone is 5,000 square feet. Lot area is calculated after the deduction of private access easements and pipestems from the gross lot area. The proposed net lot sizes are 9,208 SF for Lot 1 and 5,000 SF for Lot 2, and 5,000 SF for Lot 3. All lots meet the requirement for lot size in the R-8 zone. After the applicant redraws the site plan, proposed Lot 3 will have an access easement along the north edge of the lot. Net lot size will need to reflect this access easement, but since the future access easement is currently part of the pipestem of proposed Lot 2, the net square footage of Lots 2 and 3 should not change. The minimum lot width required in the R-8 zone is 50 feet for interior lots and 60 feet for corner lots. The minimum lot depth required in the R-8 zone is 65 feet. All proposed lots appear to meet minimum lot depth and width requirements, and appear to contain adequate building areas for the construction of suitable single-family residences when taking setbacks and lot coverage requirements into consideration. These requirements will be reviewed at the time of building permit application. In order to remain consistent with the surrounding neighborhood development, staff recommends a condition of short plat approval that the front yard for proposed Lot 1 would face east facing toward Shattuck Avenue (the existing house does conform). The front yard for Lot 2 would face north, and the front yard for Lot 3 would face west, toward Davis Avenue South. e) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries Access: Each lot would have direct access to a public right-of-way via single-family residential driveways. Topography: The site is relatively flat with a slight slope downward to the west toward Davis Avenue South. Relationship to Existing Uses: The properties surrounding the subject site are single-family residences and are designated R-8 on the City's zoning map. The proposal is similar to existing development patterns in the area and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code, which encourage residential infill development. f) Availability and Impact on Public Services (Timeliness) Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development, subject to the condition that the applicant provide Code required improvements and fees. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family lot is recommended in order to mitigate the proposal's potential impacts to City emergency services. The fee is estimated at $488.00 ($488.00 x 2 new lots = $976.00) and is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. Street addresses shall be visible from a public street. Schools: According to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Renton Land Use Element (January 16, 1992), the City of Renton has a student generation factor of 0.44 students per single-family residential dwelling. Based on the student generation factor, the proposed short plat would result in one additional student (0.44 X 2 lots = 0.88) to the local schools. It is anticipated that the Renton School District can accommodate any additional students generated by this proposal at the following schools: (Talbot Hill Elementary, Dimmitt ~iddle School and Renton High School). Storm Water: The runoff from the new lot must use infiltration per design by a professional engineer, or be tightlined into the storm drainage system or other options as listed in, and in accordance, with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Infiltration is allowed if the soils are acceptable. The Surface Water System Development Charges are based on a rate of $1,012.00 per new single-family lot. Payment of this fee will be required prior to issuance of utility construction permit. A temporary erosion control plan will be required and shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. This includes installing a silt fence along the perimeter of the site that is to be disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated. This will be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. Due to the potential for erosion to occur during project construction, staff recommends as a condition of approval that the project be required to comply with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and City of Renton P/B/PW Department Ung Short Plat, LUA 08-002, SHPL-A Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED February 19, 2008 Page 6 Sediment Control Requirements as outlined in Volume II of the current edition of the Stormwater Management Manual. Water: All plats are required by City Code to provide a fire hydrant with a minimum fire flow requirement of 1,000 GPM within 300 feet of any proposed single-family structure. !f the proposed single-family structures exceed 3,600 square feet, the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. The new and existing fire hydrants must meet all current City of Renton standards. New water service stubs to each lot must be installed prior to recording of the short plat. Fees are determined by the size of the new water meter required for the new single-family residences. Sanitary Sewer Installation of individual side sewers by the developer is required prior to recording the short plat. Dual side sewers are not allowed. A Wastewater System Development Charge will be due prior to recording. Fees are determined by the size of the new water meter required for the new residences. F. FINDINGS: Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1. Request: The applicant has requested Administrative Short Plat Approval for the Ung Short Plat, File No. LUA 08-002, SHPL-A 2. Application: The applicant's short plat application complies with the requirements for information for short plat review. The applicant's short plat plan and other project drawings are contained within the official land use file. 3. Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designations of the Residential Single Family (RSF) land use designation. 4. Zoning: The proposal as presented complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the R-8 zoning designation, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. 5. Subdivision Regulations: The proposal complies with the requirements established by the City's Subdivision Regulations provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with. 6. Existing Land Uses: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8); East: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8); South: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8); and West: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8). 7. Setbacks: Both proposed new lots would have adequate room for a residential structure. The setbacks for the new residence would be verified at the time of building permit review. 8. System Development Charges: A Water System Development Charge, a Surface Water System Development Charge and a Sewer System Development Charge, at the current applicable rates, will be required for the each new single-family residence as part of the construction permit. G. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The subject site is located in the Residential Single Family (RSF) comprehensive plan designation and complies with the goals and policies established with this designation. 2. The subject site is located in the R-8 zoning designation and complies with the zoning and development standards established with this designation provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with. 3. The proposed three lot short plat complies with the subdivision regulations as established by City Code and state law provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with. 4. The proposed three lot short plat complies with the street standards as established by City Code, provided the project complies with all advisory notes and conditions of approval contained herein. City of Renton P/B/PW Department Ung Short Plat, LUA 08-002, SHPL-A Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED February 19, 2008 Page 8 Land Use Action Appeals & Requests for Reconsideration The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the effective date of decision. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). RECONSIDERATION. Within 14 days of the effective date of the decision, any party may request that a decision on a short plat be reopened by the Administrator. The Administrator may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the Administrator finds insufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the following appeal timeframe. APPEAL. This administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on March 4, 2008 of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110 governs appeals to the Examiner. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Appeals must be filed in writing, together with the required $75.00 application fee, to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. EXPIRATION DATE: The Short Plat approval will expire two (2) years from the date of approval. An extension may be requested pursuant to RMC section 4-7-080.M. ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 2. Commercial, multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. Property Services 1. To be sent under separate cover. Fire 1. A fire hydrant with 1,000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single-family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3,600 sq. ft. in area (including garage), the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structures. The applicant should note that the fire flow available to the site is 1,000 GPM, therefore no residences over 3,600 square feet in area can be permitted on the subject site due to the limited fire flow available. 2. All hydrants to be in stalled are to be in place and operational before combustible construction is allowed. 3. During construction an emergency access shall be maintained for Fire access. The road shall be a minimum of 20 feet wide with a drivable surface capable of sustaining the weight of a Fire Apparatus. 4. Temporary addressing shall be posted identifying the address or name of each project for emergency responders. Plan Review -Sewer 1. Sanitary Sewer System Development Charge us due and will be determined by the size of the new water meter required for the new single-family homes. 2. New side sewers are required for new lots prior to recording the short plat. 3. Minimum slope for side sewers shall be 2%. Dual side sewers are not allowed. Plan Review -Water 1. Water System Development Charges is due and fees are determined by the size of the new water meter required for the new single-family residences 2. Fire flow requirement for single-family residences that are smaller than 3,600 square feet in area (including garage) is 1,000 gpm. A hydrant is required within 300 feet of the furthest structure. The new single-family residence (including garage) cannot exceed 3,600 square feet in area. 3. Existing hydrants counted as fire protection will required the installation of a "Stortz" quick disconnect fitting if not already in place. 4. All short plats shall provide a separate water service stub to each building lot prior to recording of the short plat. Separate permits and fees for water meters will be required. City of Renton P/B/PW Department Ung Short Plat, LUA 08-002, SHPL-A Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED February 19, 2008 H. DECISION: The Ung Short Plat, File No. LUA 08-002, SHPL-A, is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits and remove the deck on the existing house prior to recording the short plat. Page 7 2. The applicant shall submit to the Development Services project manager a revised, detailed landscape plan prior to the issuance of any building permit applications. All landscaping shall be installed prior to the issuance of occupancy for the buildings. 3. The applicant shall submit to the Development Services project manager a revised retention plan prior to the issuance of any utility construction permits. The applicant must either preserve additional trees, or plant 24 caliper inches of replacement trees. Each tree must be a 2-inch minimum caliper, and all landscaping shall be installed prior to final inspection. 4. The applicant shall pay a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net new average daily trip { attributed to the two new lots. Fees are to be paid prior to recording of the short plat. 7/ 7 7,; f J--=.-l 1/ £::{"!) 5. The applicant shall submit to the Development Services project manager a revised short plat plan without a pipestem for Lot 2. Instead, access to the interior lot shall be an access easement across Lot 3. Vehicular access to both lots 2 and 3 shall be via this shared private access easement. The redrawn short plat shall be submitted prior to the issuance of utility construction permits. The front yard for proposed Lot 1 shall face east facing toward Shattuck Avenue (the existing house does conform). The front yard for Lot 2 would face north and the front yard for Lot 3 would face west, toward Davis Avenue South. This shall be noted on the face of the short plat map. 7. The applicant shall pay a Fire Mitirption Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family lot prior to the recording of the short plat. 11q,7rc 8. The project shall be required to comply with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements as outlined in Volume II of the current edition of the Stormwater Management Manual. ;;,Jrr.50 DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: TRANSMITTED this 1glh day of February. 2008 to the ApplicanUOwner!Contact: Owner: Pak and Dara Ung Contact: Dan Touma, Touma Engineers 1222 N. 1851n Street, Suite 102 6632 S.191s1 Place E~102 Seattle. WA 98133 Kent, WA 98032 TRANSMITTED this 1Y1' day of February, 2008 to the Parties of Record: Kraig Carrere John G. DuBois Irene Robbins 1530 Davis Ave. S. PO Box 1187 17207 NE ih Place Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98057-1187 Bellevue, WA 98008 TRANSMITTED this 19 111 day of February, 2008 to the folfowing: Larry Meckling, Building Official Fire Marshal Neil Watts. Development Services Director Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Jan Conklin Carrie Olson Renton Reporter 1/u.i/O~ I I decision date City of Renton P/B/PW Department Ung Short Plat, LUA 08-002, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED February 19, 2008 Plan Review -Surface Water Administrative Land Use Action Page9 1. The Surface Water System Development Charges are based on a rate of $1,012.00 per new single-family lot. Payment of this fee will be required prior to the issuance of a utility construction permit. 2. Drainage requirements must meet the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Plan Review -Streets/Transportation. 1. All new electrical. phone and cable services and lines must be undergrounded. The construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording the short plat. 2. Per Renton City Code, street improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutter, and paving are required along Shattuck Avenue S. per City code prior to recording. Applicant may submit request to Development Services to pay a fee-in-lieu installing these improvements. Miscellaneous 1. All required utility, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. All plans shall be tied down to a minimum of two horizontal and vertical control in the current City of Renton Control Network. 3. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits. and the remainder when the permits are issued. There will be additional fees for water meters and service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. 4. All new rockeries or retaining walls to be constructed that are greater than 4 feet in height will require a separate building permit. 5. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Under Grounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. I-~ v._a.'.1-~~ ·! <(0<( h :J:_j a {Lu>{L ...,... I) J :1i1~1 ! 11 J ' I, i f- I fbi,l 1! <I _J ~ t}~ i .g 11 I _J <I .t::i! .. , ,,,,,' .c:c, ij ·1' ,;l -\''a oi • , I j)_f-0 '1];11 II f- 11· o~ • • "I ~ 11 -' I I ,_ r f- ! ..,_ ::l 3 .;:J:. ji~.i. I i~: i 111 · It Ill IUZz '% il! ,,j - W1 j:a _2~ ?1~ ~i6 iit I rH.: 11: Ii I d) Cl ~ Zz 00 0 ~~ = ~ w > \z~ co iii WU. I :.a z 0 ~~ <( LLl _J--, a:: wO ~ SHORT PLAT NO.-,~~=- CllY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CERTIFICATION APPROVALS; PARKS, PLANNING & RESOURCES DEPARTMENT E><0m__, .,..,d ~ thlt __ ~Y ol -----"-- Manoqer. Blllldln9 & lond ~"Pffi""I Divlolon r,amlned and apprwe<J thia __ dOy of -----"-- DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS RECORDING NO. VOL/PAGE r,omln«i and 0ppn:,...,d lhls __ do~ <>I' 20--~--SCALE; ~-~ --I i i T Doputr .._. .. ,,.. PORTION OF 334040-1-4-J!';, KWOW Al.I. PEOPLE f!Y 11-ESE H!ESQITS that wa, tt,., vnd<nl9nod own""" Dt\W0pman1 E,i~in-~woont Wumber NW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SEC 19, TWN 23 N, RG 5 E, W.ti ~~t::~i~;!" th'°..":1~:'!!:i:eor1th:'~~: t~•;-::op~~:;,..,...ntot.,., 1----------------------------------------'----'-----------------------------I or IM' ,ome. Ot\d !Mt •""'l flU~r,\&l,:,n is modi W<tl'I 1h• 'fl'M .-.,;,1 LUA-XX-XXX-SHPOEVELOPMENT PLAN IN \IITNESS Mi(~OF •• nl ""' l\<>nd• ond nol9,. • EX. UON INCAS[ LNO-XX-XXX JTY OF RENTON on~ tn i>ceor<lor,¢,! w,th tho de-ot tha owner,,, /..EGENO ~ C NING ~-,_. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Stat" ol lll<n~9t0<1 --·----------1 CW"tl!y tho\ 1 1on-o, ~ ..... ..,t1-IGQtory ffld.,.,. tl'lol ""11'..i IMo. 1",tnnntnl cr.d --9H II t<> b• (Mo/),•) lroo and ooO,~lary <>Ct f0< tl,11 ~-o,,d pull'-m ... tk>n•d In 1h11 ln•lrum..,I. S1gnotL.•·<> <>I ~to.:,P~~--------- Dolotd .;;;;;;;-:;;;;;;;;-====== Wy "ll;,ohtmont ~l<P"' Stot. of Yl'<:lsl!ll\9ton CQ!Jnly N _________ _ I tortify lhot I kn""' or h""" &<11111/ool<ry ll",'lder,,::11 lh<>t ID9"ed tlli1 ln11l"'m""t ar,d ~~6(1 ii to b11 <hl1/her) QI! ond •,oh,r,tary oet for tho u-ar,d -,.....tk>n<KI In tho lnat'11m..,t. ~oh,,.... ol NOi«)' PubO<: --------- ~t:pok,tm""I •"P*-F #Si609039003 -----+-. ~ • ! \ < • ~ a • • 0 -' • • • • J. S19lliS"'= RECORDER'S CERTJFICATENo. Fi!ed for record this __ doy of ___ ,20_ at __ in book __ of ___ at poge ___ ot the request Jof Mouoic H Touma • SURFACE BRASS MONUMENT o FOUNO f?clJAR & CAP OR IRON PJPC KC":<=:::] • SET 1/2• REABR & CAP L.:::.,. LS 19470 SCALE 1'"=50' )I( FND PK NAil + S£C710N CORNER 1~s~YJT;' r~~~ 30oow TOTAL STATION C>Od 1/4 CORNER t.lETI-i0D USED: FlEl..D "TRAVERSE WITI1 ACTUAL F'tllND Pt< ""'0 SHINDI / O.o:;" "IORTH 01' LINE FIELD MEASUREMEN"TS ANO ANGLES WAC 332-130-090 DATE Ot SURVEY: APRIL 2005 8AS1S OF BEARING:-S 15th S1'REET (N 89"53'48•W) S 15TH S1REET ·o f I ~ 1n " 0 0 z JAN -8 2008 RECEIVED Cl'l'I' 0#' IU;NTDN WON fi!iM Cl! MON I •16 f'Olt<O liltt.SS Pill IN c<::tlC. ~~\?,'I~ IN~~IN~s%k)liET~,lt ~"'° S 150• S'r!l£ET (B-4/()i,} C "' \30044?.lle-O:t M "' 17l22!1.--0 El. "' M.46' ( • 12"292.0208 a. ,nu· ,/'.t 'MUI. ~tfl..tt A\/E $ ~N • 17l221.GQiO ~ lllt'ffla"'lir----"" r-~---- \.,oo \ -- N89"53'48"W (BMISOF~) 410.11 {") 410.00' (P) • I 11S\!.CI' (CR} Si 115:j.l!t(l(W) ~ ~ ,- 1 r I I r-- 1 I I I ,-----OWNER j PAK UNG ~oo' ['·1 19312 ,1.7TH AVE. NE S£A mE, WASHINGTON 98155 I \ \ \ A I I I I REN SPlflolf-7'1 I • I I 7"112:S.!l"tOO! C 2 I I I • I 206-542-2171 1 LOT 1 ENGINEER / SURVEYOR I I LUA-95-03a-SHPL TOUMA ENGINEERS &: LAND SUR\/EYORS I / 86.32 S 191st PLACE SUITE E -102 !-KENT/ WASHINGTON 980.32 ~t-(425 .251-0C56!i VI I ~j ----SHORT PLAT DATA ,-. \-\~ i -- \-$ ~' ; \ _l ___ _ _l __ ' j I;!;' ·15l TOTAL SHORT PLAT AREA 21.194 sq. ft. l <( g -1 LDT 2 NUMBER ~ LOTS PROPOSED -J ~~o ZONE .. R-8 I U g SM.All LOT AREA • ~ sq.ft. ,,.. DENSl1Y • 6.80 DU/ACRE ~ I -I PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE Of NE _l _____ _ ~ ----1 -9,208 s f. --1 v, I 2 -7.(XH s. f. (Nilt 5,000 s.f.) UIA-94-!Sl·SHPL 3 -5,000 s. f. I <") -~11079004 ~ ~ LOT3 FRONT .. 20 f"T. &O '11 ~ :ot YAAg' .FT; FT. LEGAL D£SCRIP710N r LO' S. BUl<:K 9 OF CO HIUMAN'S EARLINGTON '°'~ "' \ - ~-\ E:K~RE:S ~ 4 TO B£ m,ll',EI ; \ ,GAR/ltG( j -~ l0.7~ L --292.09' N ~ ---17.3.22' • ~ 7e' LOT2 ~ L01' BLK,9 V'.\ ;:;:; lDT1 -.., • \ "' 0 I GARDENS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEA TTl£. DIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE Pt.AT THEREOF, RECORDED IN ij 11 VOLUME 17 OF PLATS. PAGE 74. IN KING COUNTY, LOTJ I \ r -rri.l LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE . ~ This map correctly represents a survey mode by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of the Survey Recording Act at the request of Pok Ung n August, 2007 ~~ Hill/SE TO ' ~ WASHINGTON 200 ,--,. Rr,:m • . _. 'l,'!JIJD 1 9 5sqft ' 69 Q8' __ ...J ~~~JL..__ --__,-. o~,u' :i~ • I i / LINE "·' .~,· N89"53'~~ w '" r--:;_;~ -I 11 273.41' 6 jiff: TOUMA ENGINEERS 11~\ ~-.,:~~ 'M:ST VALL.EY EXECl.111\.£ PARK D\\N. BY M32 :SOUTl-l 191ST Pl.ACE. SUllE E-102 •!(ENT, il'A 98032 I DAN T PH(Y& /._?",) ?~1-M~~ nY /£?.'<\ ,~1-M?'< l______.'._ LINE TABLE u l2 1J LENGTH 26.71;! 23.06 26.76 BEARING soo·o§.:JZ·'w S2!".)4'26''w ;01·36'42•v PAK SHORT PLAT 1517 SHA TTIJCK A VENUE S RENTON, WA 98055 DATE J08 NO. t5 ~ ~ ~ l ---I AUGUST, 2007 950-001-07\ SHORT PLAT NO......,,=-===~ CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ... LSSJ r;r..,.,vr;ulf'IL.> t'jV, SCALE: ~ --j -~ PORTION OF ~Vl../<,"\L.>C. i r i T NW 1/4 Of' Tl<E SE 1/4 Of' SEC 19, lWN 23 N, RG 5 E. W. SURVEY NOTES INSTRUMENT: TOPCON GPl 3000W TOTAL STAllON METHOD USED: FIELD TRA~SE V!lTH ACTUAL LUA-XX-XXX-SHPL LND-XX-XXX FlELD MEASUREMENTS AND ANGLES WAC 332-130-090 DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL 2005 SASlS OF SEARING; S 15th STREET (N 89"5J' ot1a•W) DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON CR .. oo , <7~ ~~~ BR~J~,:z ~~ FOUND 1/2° PIN IN IN PIPE INT[ll, Of' S PUGE,· DR & C0t<CJ(ETE IN c ... sf ~ eo,,soo OR 5 (S/OS) 1tlT[ll, 51-1.lffiJO: ~;,: S N -17.1:i-21.$096 FO'JND P.: mo SHINCl't ANO S 1= S'IF!ffl (0~/~) E • 1.300+<7.8845 r O.M· "°"™ Of' IJIE S 15TH STREET ~; g'J~:~J,a a· M.4&' / £.L. 132.8!!' r . --~-. --N89'53'48·w 410.11 (M) 410.00' (P) 8 --,f't----,:-=,~---:°7;;;· --. LEGEND JAN -8 2008 RECEIVED \ _ ~ (BASIS Cf' BEARIIIG} ~ 11M.ml (ii) g ~ \~~-1--: -: --:--1~~ i·,,---e OCCIOUOUS TRIT T(J REMAIN * CONIFER 71?££ ro RE)IJ..IN \ I REN SP'll,'-1-7"1 I i"ll2l.'-1"1004 I I ! LDT 1 \ \ A I B I / I > I I ~I C,A·95·030-SHSC • I I I t/> bl ---- ~c~---~----~----~------~~~ 1 ,; \~ ~ ~ ~ 8/ '"' 'i \ ~ I ~ I~ ----i1 If> \ ---------Lll,K,9 --------1 ili I I WA .... IS,-SHPL Ji.\ u SlRUCT1JR£S I(') '9511079004 -..I._ \ TI) BE ROIOVED ~ UYJ' 3 f"\ , I ,£, .~\/.:..:..~_ ',:! ',,,• -'=";J;{ ~\ 0/ / // l1 ~-~\ / -~---. ,. :~~J::~:>:·-: '( ,, \~ r \Q&: 2~9.:.;,~~' lfg:,.frt r g/ ', \ . $ N8?3'~ }~ ~~.~~--'~-.-,-,.-:ft .08' . \ ·, .• _JY ,,, l~\1--.... ' " 'I ® 0£CJDUOUS TR££ ro 8£ REMO~ @ CONIFER TR££ TO 8£ R£UOVW 0 H£DG£ LOT i': ' -~ ~ ; ;~,'s.;R.--) LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH BEARING u 26.1_~1 -s..QQ.:06·12· ..... L2 2_;toGI :S:£\"34'26'V ,, 2_6.761 :S:01"36'42"\o/' w " <C ~ ~ [g TOUMA £NG1N£ERS PAK SHORT PLAT TOPOGRAPHY AND TREE SURVEY WEST VAU.EY EXECUTI\/E PARK OWN. BY DATE JOB NO. 5632 SOIJlH 191ST PLAl:r. SUITE E-102 'KDIT, WA 9i,ro2 DAN T. AUGUST, 2007 950-001-071 PHCtiE (425) 251-0&65 FAX (425) 251--0625 l-::,-,,.-.;..,----+-,-:.,-c,------+-,~::-;------; CHKO. SY SCALE SHEET 1 ui-n N(\TIT' i 'l Zz 00 Q ~o = = UJ a..~ "' > ~~ 00 -I UJ WU. (.) ::.o z ~?: <( Ul __J- -, rx: wO ' > su <) ' ! • l, t J I ~ ""' --' T cs M " J "'·rl lilli . ill 1!1!11 ----J " /1 l I ' j l jtj!i ' i l I Hfl 0 'I I l i ~' l ! ' . ~' I I i City ot. __ nton Department of Planning I Building I Pub arks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT ECONOMIC DEV COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 30, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-002, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 16, 2008 APPLICANT: Pak & Dana Uno PLANNER: Andrea Petzel PROJECT TITLE: Unq Short Plat PLAN REVIEWER: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 21,193 square feet BUILDING AREA (oross): 978 square feet LOCATION: 1517 Shattuck Avenue S WORK ORDER NO: 77858 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicantion for administrative short plat review for a three-lot subdivision of a 21,193 SF parcel in the R-8 zone. The existing 978 SF house would remain. Residential density would be 6.12 du/ac. Lots 2 and 3 would be accessed from Davis Ave. S. and Lot 1 would be accessed from Shattuck Ave. S. Proposed lot sizes would be 9,208, 7,004 and 5,000 SF. There are 1 O significant trees onsite; the applicant proposes to retain 1. The parcel has sensitive slopes onsite, but per the geotechnical report submitted by the applicant there are no critical areas present. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minar Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housinn Air Aesthetics Waler Linhl/Glare Planrs Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnorlation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ H,sroric!Cultural Natural Resources Presorvat,on Airport E11viror1men/ 10,000 Feet 14.000 Feet 8. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative DatT I Andrea Petzel Associate planner, Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Dear Sir, PO Box 1187 Renton, WA 98057-1187 27 Jan 08 Ung Short Plat/ LUAOS-002, SHPL-A My only concern, at this time, is the removal of the IO significant trees on site. One in particular, a very old cherry tree hard against the South border of the plot should be retained. Respectfully, January 23, 2008 City of Renton Department of Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Attention: Andrea Petzel, Associate Planner RE: Ung Short Plat/ LUAOS-002. SHPL-A Hello Ms. Petzel, I'm sending you this letter, requesting that I be made a party of record for the above list project. I do have a few questions I'd like to get answers to that you may be able to provide. They are as follows: 1. When will purposed construction start on this project? 2. What is the actual style of the purposed house? 3. How can I get a copy of building plans? 4. What concessions will be made for home owners around the project, should there be issues/concerns regarding the construction project? 5. If I disagree with various parts or stages of the process, what recourse will I have? Thank you for your time Ms. Petzel. Any information you can provide will be helpful for me as I prepare myself and family for this purposed project. Kind Regards, ~~\_.~ Kraig L. Carrere 1530 Davis Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 425-277-9250 Home 425-421-8767 Office PLANNING/BUILDING/ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: January 29, 2007 Andrea Petzel . • .· /,r-- Mike Dotson l'if VV" · TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ung Short Plat, LUAOS-002, SHPL-A The following Utility and Transportation comments concern the Environmental and Development Application review for the subject project. EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER -The site is within the City of Renton water service area. Domestic and Fire Service water is available. Specifically there is an 8-inch watermain within the existing roadways (both Shattuck and Davis Ave S). The project site is located in the 300-water pressure zone. The site is outside of the Aquifer Protection Area. Fire Flow available to the site is over 1,000 gpm. Static water pressure is approximately 80psi. SEWER-There is an 8-inch sewer main adjacent and available to serve the site. STORM -There exist storm drainage pipelines and a ditched stom1 water conveyance system along the existing roadway. STREET -There is currently a paved and partially improved public right-of-way along the frontage of this site. CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT WATER I. In accordance with the Fire Department requirement (prior to recording the subdivision), at a minimum, one hydrant within 300 feet of any proposed single- family structure is required. Additional fire flow and hydrants are required if the total square footage of the new single-family structures are greater than 3600 square feet. 2. A Water System Development Charge is due. Fees are determined by the size of the new water meter required for the new single-family residence(s). SAN IT ARY SEWER 1. A new side sewer is required to be constructed to the new lot prior to recording of the short plat. H:\Division.s\Dcvclop.ser\Dev&plan.ing\PROJECTS\08-002.Andrea\Ung GF.doc Ung GF.doc Page 2 of2 2. A Wastewater System Development Charge is due. Fees are determined by the size of the new water meter required for the new single-family residence. SURFACE WATER I. Surface Water System Development Charge is Sl,012 per new dwelling unit. This fee is due with the construction permit. 2. Drainage requirements must meet the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. TRANSPORTATION 1. Per City of Renton code this short plat is required to install curb, gutter and sidewalks, along the frontage of the parcel being developed. 2. The traffic mitigation fee of $75 per additional generated trip shall be assessed per additional single family home at a rate of9.57 trips per day. This fee is payable at time of recording the plat. 3. All new electrical, phone and cable services must be underground. Construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording of the short plat. CONDITIONS I. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the Department of Ecology Standards and staff review. 2. A Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per additional Average Daily Trip shall be assessed. The total for 2 new single-family lots is $1,435.50. H:\Division.s\Develop.ser\Dcv&plan.ing\PROJECTS\08-002.Andrca\Ung GF.doc City of _ nton Department of Planning I Building I Public .. arks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 30, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUAOS-002, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 16, 2008 APPLICANT: Pak & Dana Una PLANNER: Andrea Petzel PROJECT TITLE: Una Short Plat PLAN REVIEWER: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 21,193 sauare feet BUILDING AREA (aross\: 978 sauare feet LOCATION: 1517 Shattuck Avenue S WORK ORDER NO: 77858 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicantion for administrative short plat review for a three-lot subdivision of a 21,193 SF parcel in the R-8 zone. The existing 978 SF house would remain. Residential density would be 6.12 du/ac. Lots 2 and 3 would be accessed from Davis Ave. S. and Lot 1 would be accessed from Shattuck Ave. S. Proposed lot sizes would be 9,208, 7,004 and 5,000 SF. There are 10 significant trees onsite; the applicant proposes to retain 1. The parcel has sensitive slopes onsite, but per the geotechnical report submitted by the applicant there are no critical areas present. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e_g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housinn Aff Aesthetics Water LinfiVG/are Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Uld!/ies Animals Transnortalion Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Natural Resources Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed (his application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Project Name: Project Address: Contact Person: Permit Number: Project Description: Land Use Type: ~esidential D Retail D Non-retail Calculation: 3 -\ - 1 up.. O}?-oo),,. Method of Calculation: &fiE Trip Generation Manual, 7'" Edition D Traffic Study D Other c21 o 1 sre er -5 7 / r:,..,,._, C)' s 7:. }~.14 ~[ Transportation Mitigation Fee: _.:,i,$~1c.i,)4,J..::~..:..5..:.., ..::5::.0:::.... ___________________ _ Calculated by: .;.1\u_..1.¥:i~.1 .... ih!,.W.r.,.lv'------------Date: ] I ;ID l:mo'h J Date of Payment: --------------------------- City of nton Department of Planning I Building I Pubhc . forks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPL/CATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: TRANSPORTATION COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 30, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-002, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 16, 2008 APPLICANT: Pak & Dana Una PLANNER: Andrea Petzel PROJECT TITLE: Unq Short Plat PLAN REVIEWER: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 21,193 square feet BUILDING AREA (qross): 978 square feet LOCATION: 1517 Shattuck Avenue S I WORK ORDER NO: 77858 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicantion for administrative short plat review for a three-lot subdivision of a :t1fi:rsF~p~'rcel in the R-8 zone. The existing 978 SF house would remain. Residential density would be 6.12 du/ac. Lots 2 and 3 would be accessed from Davis Ave. S. and Lot 1 would be accessed from Shattuck Ave. S. Proposed lot sizes would be 9,208, 7,004 and 5,000 SF. There are 10 significant trees onsite; the applicant proposes to retain 1. The parcel has sensitive slopes on site, but per the geotechnical report submitted by the applicant there are no critical areas present. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earlh Housrna Air Aestlle/1cs Water Linh/JG/are Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use LJ(!lities Animals Transnortal!on Env1roomen/a/ Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet \ /z,o I xme, B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this appfication with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional i mati n is needed to properly assess this proposal. -?/4.. Date/ t • FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: 1/24/08 TO: FROM: Mike Dotson, Plan Examiner ~ f David Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: LUAOS-002 Ung Administrative Short Plat Approval A review of the plans and material as well as an on site review of the Ung Short Plat was conducted. The review was conducted for the Administrative Short Plat Approval process. Review of the plans and material as well as the on site review disclosed the following Fire Code requirements needing to be met for Administrative Short Plat Approval. Fire Code requirements are as follows: 1. The Fire Conditions noted in the March 10, 2005 Pre-application review meeting still need to be met and are still applicable to this permit. A copy of those conditions shall accompany this review. 2. HYDRANTS: All hydrants to be installed are to be in place and operational before combustible construction is allowed. 3. Emergency Access: During construction an Emergency Access shall be maintained for Fire Apparatus Access. The road shall be a minimum of 20 feet wide with a drivable surface capable of sustaining the weight of a Fire Apparatus. 4. Temporary Address: Temporary address shall be posted identifying the Address or Name of the project for emergency responders to readily and easily identify the site when responding to an emergency. 5. Fire Mitigation Fees: A fire mitigation fee of $488.00 is required for all new single-family structure. Fees to be paid prior to Final Plat recording. Any questions or concerns regarding the Fire reviewer's comments on this Preliminary Plat approval may be directed to Assistant Fire Marshal, David Pargas at 425-430-7023 i:\city mcmos\08 final & prclim rcv\luaOS-002 ung administrative short plat approval.doc City o ton Department of Planning I Building I Publt _ • (orks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: FIRE COMMENTS DUE: JANUARV--30,. 2008 _A~PP'-L=IC~A~T_l~O_N'-N'-0~:_L=U=A~0~8'--0'-0'-2,'-S'-H-P~L~-A~--------l'-D=A'-T~E=C=l'-R~C~U-=L'-'AT'-E=-'D=:-J=A.ccNccU=A-,R"'Y'-:1'-'6~,-=W+'OO..::.;·"=-~~---· _· -_----- 1 -----7 APPLICANT: Pak & Dana Una PROJECT TITLE: Una Short Plat SITE AREA: 21.193 square feet LOCATION: 1517 Shattuck Avenue S PLANNER: Andrea Petzel PLAN REVIEWER: Mike Dotson • I BUILDING AREA lnrossl: 978 sauate fefjt, ., r r'! r, WORK ORDER NO: 77858 -·--·,. I b 2008 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicantion for administrative short plat review for a three-lot subdivisio'nofa 2J, 193 SF parc§l_in the R-8 zone. The existing 978 SF house would remain. Residentral density would be 6.12 du/ac. b_ots 2 and 3 would be accesseinrom Davis Ave. S. and Lot 1 would be accessed from Shattuck Ave. S. Proposed lot sizes would be UQe;-7,004 and 5,000 SF. There are 10 significant trees onsite; the applicant proposes to retain 1. The parcel has sensitive slopes onsite, but per ihe geoteelmicaL report submitted by the applicant there are no critical areas present. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housinn Air Aesthetics Water Uoht/Glare P/anls Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnorlation Environmental Health Public Setvices Energy! Hisloric/Cultural Na/ufiJI Resources Presetvation Arrporl Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have experlise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City o nton Department of Planning I Building I Pub, 'arks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PARKS DEPT COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 30, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-002, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 16, 2008 APPLICANT: Pak & Dana Una PLANNER: Andrea Petzel PROJECT TITLE: Una Short Plat PLAN REVIEWER: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 21,193 souare feet BUILDING AREA lnross): 978 sauare feet LOCATION: 1517 Shattuck Avenue S WORK ORDER NO: 77858 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicantion for administrative short plat review for a three-lot subdivision of a 21,193 SF parcel in the R-8 zone. The existing 978 SF house would remain. Residential density would be 6.12 dulac. Lots 2 and 3 would be accessed from Davis Ave. S. and Lot 1 would be accessed from Shattuck Ave. S. Proposed lot sizes would be 9,208, 7,004 and 5,000 SF. There are 1 O significant trees onsite: the applicant proposes to retain 1. The parcel has sensitive slopes onsite, but per the geotechnical report submitted by the applicant there are no critical areas present. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information fmpacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Ail Aesthetics Water Lm/Jt!Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Histon'c/Cultura/ Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14.000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS ~ U;-1Ll-/l-€ /2ZJ-~paa<S 73 ft,}1:a_ C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we /Jave expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informatio needed to properly assess this proposal. Da City o. , .~nton Department of Planning I Building I Pub 'arks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT CONSTRUCTION COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 30, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-002, SHPL-A DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 16, 2008 APPLICANT: Pak & Dana Una PLANNER: Andrea Petzel PROJECT TITLE: Una Short Plat PLAN REVIEWER: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 21,193 sauare feet BUILDING AREA loross): 978 square feet LOCATION: 1517 Shattuck Avenue S WORK ORDER NO: 77858 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicantion for administrative short plat review for a three-lot subdivision of a 21,193 SF parcel in the R-8 zone. The existing 978 SF house would remain. Residential density would be 6.12 du/ac. Lots 2 and 3 would be accessed from Davis Ave. S. and Lot 1 would be accessed from Shattuck Ave. S. Proposed lot sizes would be 9,208, 7,004 and 5,000 SF. There are 1 O significant trees onsite; the applicant proposes to retain 1. The parcel has sensitive slopes onsite, but per the geotechnical report submitted by the applicant there are no critical areas present. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information fmpacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housinrr Air Aesthetics Water Linf1l/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals T ransoorlafion Environmental Heaflh Public Services Energy/ Natural Resources Historic/Cultural Preservation Ai:port Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wh~e additional informati n is needed to properly assess this proposal. 01/,, If!/ " , 11tdw 1 Date City of nenton Department of Planning I Building I Pub.,c , .'arks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION NO: LUA08-002, SHPL-A APPLICANT: Pak & Dana Un PROJECT TITLE: Un Short Plat SITE AREA: 21,193 s uare feet LOCATION: 1517 Shattuck Avenue S COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 30, 2008 . '" ·" ' , <:;;~\. '• DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 16, .. PLANN Andrea Petze ikeDotson BUILDING AREA uare feet/ WORK ORDER NO: 77858 PLEASE RETURN TO ANDREA PETZEL IN DEVELOPMENT PLANNING\TH FLOQJt SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicantion for administrative short plat review for a three-lot subdivision of a 21,19'.l SF parcel in the R-8 zone. The existing 978 SF house would remain. Residential density would be 6.12 du/ac. Lots 2 and 3 would be accessed from Davis Ave. S. and Lot 1 would be accessed from Shattuck Ave. S. Proposed lot sizes would be 9,208, 7,004 and 5,000 SF. There are 1 O significant trees onsite; the applicant proposes to retain 1. The parcel has sensitive slopes onsite, but per the geotechnical report submitted by the applicant there are no critical areas present. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics WMer Lirrhl/Glaro Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Uti/ii!es Animals Transno1tar1on Environmental Health Public Services -Energy/ Natural Resources Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feel 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ad iti al information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 1-11-tr Date NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Mast&r Applicatlon has been fH&d and accepted with the Dwelopment Services Division of the City of Renton. The foUowlng briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Ung Short Plat/ LUA08-002, SHPL·A PROJECT DESCRIPTION; Applicanlion fur administrative short plat review for a three"lot suod1v1s1on of a 21,193 SF parcel 1n the R·8 zone. The existing 978 SF house wcmld remain. Res1dentral density would be 6.12 duiac Lots 2 and 3 would be accesse,j from Davis Ave S and Lo\ 1 would t>e accessed from Shattuck Ave. S. Proposed 101 sizes would be 9,208. 7,004 and 5.000 SF. There are 10 significant trees ons1te; the apphcan1 proposes to retain 1. The parcel has sensitive slopes onsite, but per the geotechnical report submitied by the applicant there are no critical areas preseni PROJECT LOCATION: 1517 Shattuck A~enue S PUBLIC APPROVALS: Adm,n1strat,ve Short Plal apprn,·al APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON Dan Tauma. Touma Engineers Tel. 1425) 251-0555, Email: mhtouma@aal cam Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Andr,:,~ Petzel, Associ~t,:, Planner, Development Services Division, 10SS South Grady Way, Renton, WA 96057, by 5:00 PM on January 30, 2008. 11 you have questions about this proposal. or wish to oo made a party al record and recei~e add1tmnal notification by mail, contad the Pro Jed Manager a1 (4251 430-7270 Anyone who submrts written comments will automatically becacr\e a party of record and will be notified oJ any dec:1sran an thrs project PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IOENTJFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: January 8, 2008 January 16, 2008 January 16, 2008 ___ _ If you would like to be made a party of record ta receive further ,ntonnal1on an t<><s p,opose:I pro1ect, complete t~,~ t,m- and ret~rn to City of Renton. Development Planning, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. WA 98057 F,I~ Nam~/ No Ung Shnrt Plat I LUAOB-002, SHPL-A NAME MAILING ADDRESS---------------------------- TELEPHONE NO ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residin , on the 11 'ti'\ day of <}.o-hUO.f' 1 CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 16th day of January, 2008, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter & NOA documents. This information was sent to: Name Reoresentina Pak & Dara Ung Owners/Applicants Dan Touma, Touma Engineers Contact Surrounding Property Owners -NOA only See attached .<It;;/ A,/ ,-'f, , -/, (Signature of Sender): / -~ ~-1/ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and t ' d' h ' ,,\\\\\'•\lj; purposes men 1one in t e instrument. _,.,::-' ,nJ.; _;.1 __ 11 11 -·') \. ' ,_,, ..... ,, ..l".·.-~. ' •'1· '., /,1 .:: .,,._ . . ,_'I, ~ :~~ Dated: 1-l Lo -08 Project Name: Ung Short Plat Project Number: LUA08-002, SHPL-A 722200031903 ALABADO RUELITO N+JANET R 1508 SHATIUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 722200030707 BEKELE TABOR+ TI LAH UN GENET 15045 HATIUCK AVES RENTON WA 98055 722200031804 BROWN LAURENCE M 1517 MORRIS AVES RENTON WA 98055 334040144001 CHAMBERS MARY AILEEN 1603 SHATIUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 334040138581 CORDELL DOLLY PO BOX 121 RENTON WA 98057 334040145503 DIAMBRI VICKI 1615 SHATIUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 722200032802 FRITZ DARLENE J 1616 SHATIUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 334040138003 HILLARD ADAM 1612 LAKE AVE S RENTON WA 98055 334040124003 JONSON RAY N & JULIE A 18808 SE 170TH ST RENTON WA 98058 334040127501 KNIGHT RONALD R&JANICE A PO BOX 6 RENTON WA 98057 722200032406 ANARDI PATRICK JAMES+DEBRA PO BOX 53233 RENTON WA 98058 722200032505 BRENNER BRIAN E 1619 MORRIS AVE S RENTON WA 98055 334040124607 CARLSON HAROLD L 1509 DAVIS AVE S RENTON WA 98055 722200031309 CHEUNG CECIL 1511 MORRIS AVE S RENTON WA 98055 334040145602 DALLOSTO WILMA 1616 DAVIS AVE S RENTON WA 98055 722200031507 DIETZ WILMA C 1522 SHATIUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 722200032604 GENEROSO DARLA M G 1612 SHATIUCK AVES RENTON WA 98055 722200031705 JACQUES JAMES H 1216 N 38TH ST RENTON WA 98056 334040141700 JOSE MARIO 317 S 15TH ST RENTON WA 98055 722200031002 LAFRANCHI JOSEPH A+JULIE S 401 S 15TH ST RENTON WA 98055 334040158506 BARE! PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 1756 RENTON WA 98057 334040157102 BRODERICK GABRIELLE R 234 S 15TH ST RENTON WA 98055 334040144100 CARRERE KRAIG L 1530 DAVIS AVE S RENTON WA 98055 334040141502 COOK JUDY 1506 DAVIS AVES RENTON WA 98055 722200031606 DARRIN ROBERT A 1523 S MORRIS ST RENTON WA 98055 334040144506 DUBOIS JOHN G PO BOX 1187 RENTON WA 98057 334040141601 GIULIANI JOHN R JR 812 N 1ST ST RENTON WA 98055 334040142500 JOHNSON KEVIN M 1507 SHATIUCK AVES RENTON WA 98055 722200031101 KATZER FLORA M 505 S 15TH ST RENTON WA 98055 722200030905 LY SUYHAK+ TIFFANIE 415 S 15TH ST RENTON WA 98055 • 334040158001 MALESIS LOUIS G+MARY K 1718 SE 7TH CT RENTON WA 98055 334040125109 NAKIBINGE EDWARD L+MARY F 1517 DAVIS AVE S RENTON WA 98055 722200032109 NICHOLS GLORIA M 1608 SHATIUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 334040141809 PIRES GRACE B 327 S 15TH ST RENTON WA 98055 334040125505 ROBINSON BRIAN+SUSAN M 1521 DAVIS AVES RENTON WA 98055 722200030806 TRUONG THOMAS & NGUYEN LEE 407 S 15TH ST RENTON WA 98055 334040125208 YUAN JIN HUAN+OU CUI LING 1519 DAVIS AVES RENTON WA 98055 334040127006 MILLS MARGARET S 1609 DAVIS AVE S RENTON WA 98055 334040142609 NAUD PHILIPPE 10309 ASHWORTH AVE N SEATILE WA 98133 722200032307 NICK TWO LLC PO BOX 58233 RENTON WA 98058 334040126503 RADFORD KATHRINE S+PIRES MICHAEL A 1603 DAVIS AVES RENTON WA 98055 723160007008 THAI TRAN KHANH 1432 SHATIUCK AVES RENTON WA 98055 722200032208 TURALBA BEN O & CARMELITA G 1609 MORRIS AVE S RENTON WA 98055 722200031408 MURPHY JAMES E+SUSAN L 1512 SHATIUCK AVES RENTON WA 98055 334040144308 NGUYEN ANDREW NAM 1609 SHATIUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 334040125000 PASAG MARLON G+LAILANI B 1515 DAVIS AVES RENTON WA 98055 334040139001 ROBBINS CAROL 17207 NE 7TH PL BELLEVUE WA 98008 334040137500 THEODOROU PETER 1622 LAKE AVE S RENTON WA 98055 334040143508 UNG PAK S 19312 47TH AVE NE SEATILE WA 98155 o"'~~l,o«< . ... . :$l-~ ?3rvrr0 NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Ung Short Plat I LUAOB-002, SHPL-A PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicantion for administrative short plat review for a three-lot subdivision of a 21,193 SF parcel in the R-8 zone. The existing 978 SF house would remain. Residential density would be 6.12 du/ac Lots 2 and 3 would be accessed from Davis Ave. S. and Lot 1 would be accessed from Shattuck Ave. S. Proposed lot sizes would be 9,208, 7,004 and 5,000 SF. There are 10 significant trees onsite, the applicant proposes to retain 1 The parcel has sensitive slopes onsite, but per the geotechnical report submitted by the applicant there are no critical areas present. PROJECT LOCATION: PUBLIC APPROVALS: 1517 Shattuck Avenue S Administrative Short Plat approval APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Dan Touma, Touma Engineers: Tel (425) 251-0665; Email: mhtouma@aol com Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Andrea Petzel, Associate Planner, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on January 30, 2008. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additionaf notification by mail, contact the Project Manager at (425) 430-7270. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I DATE OF APPLICATION: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: January 8, 2008 January 16, 2008 If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning. 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 File Name I No Ung Short Plat/ LUAOB-002, SHPL-A NAME MAILING ADDRESS:------------------------------ TELEPHONE NO.: -------------- CIT'\-. :>F RENTON ~~ + + + Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department ~ ~ ~ Denis Law, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator ~N~OY"---------~------------------------------~- January 16, 2008 Dan Touma Touma Engineer & Surveyors 6632 S 191'1 Place #E-102 Kent, WA 98032 Subject: Ung Short Plat LUA08-002, SHPL-A Dear Mr. Touma: The Development Planriing Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. You will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7270 if you have any questions. Sincerely, r i I ;f ri(tJ(! (_){;d,{/j_ Y( I Andrea Petzel · Associate Planner cc: Pak & Dara Ung/ Owners ------l-05_5_S_o_uth_G_rad_y_W_ay---R-e-nt-on-,-W-as-hi-.n-gt_o_n_9_8_05_7 ______ ~ @ This paper contains 50% recycled mate~~I. 30% Posteonsumer AHEAD OF THF. CURVE ~SY 0 ·*' + CITY JF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator (!~'«, ~ ..II i'; Denis Law, Mayor !i'N'tO;,------------------------------ January 16, 2008 Michael Fortson Department of Transportation Renton School District 1220 N 4'" Street Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Ung Short Plat LUAOS-002, SHPL-A The City of Renton Development Services Division has received an application for a 3-lot single-family subdivision located at 1517 Shattuck Avenue S. Please sec the enclosed Notice of Application for further details. In order to process this application, the Development Services Division needs to know which Renton schools would be attended by children living in residences at the location indicated above. Please fill in the appropriate schools on the list below and return this letter to my attention, Development Services Division, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98057 by January 30, 2008. Elementary School: ffil.f':>6T t+J LJ_, Middle School: __ PJ,__~M~M~~(~t~1 _________________ _ High School: ----1f2~e-JO~~P_N_· _________________ _ Will the schools you have indicated be able to handle th~91pact of the additional students estimated to come from the proposed development? Yes No __ _ Any Comments: _______________________________ _ Thank you for providing this important information. lfyou have any questions regarding this project, please contact me at ( 425) 430-7270. Sincerely, i I ! (,tpj,J I v'l/wWL YrWtfC Andrea Petzel · Associate Planner Encl. -------10_5_5_S-ou_th_G-rad_y_W_a_y_--R-en-to_n_,_W_a_shi-.n-gt_o_n_9_8_0_57 _______ ~ @ This paper contains 50% recycled matenal, 30% post consumer . AHEAD OF Tl-JI'. CllllVE City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APP LI CATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: ~k ' t},..-.,.. u \.J.G, '3. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: l)1,i 1 She~.\-~\A-.- ADDRESS: I 1..2 7.. ~ \_O.,S~~.-s..,.t.. IO'L PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: CITY: ,t\k_ ZIP: Se ... "i ~ l 3-:0., \ '::, r-1 'S 1-"v\ -\t u (... \,-f\ut:_ c... TELEPHONE NUMBER: 'J,6f..e-7L..j'2__ z..1, \ KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): APPLICANT (if other than owner) 3'A4 o'-1.ci -l '-\ 3S NAME: Sqmf' EXISTING LAND USE(S): ~ -S I ~~J . .e__. Y"\'\ , \ l I\ COMPANY (if applicable): PROPOSED LAND USE(S): a s,,..,_ 1 A \t._=,\ A ADDRESS: EXISTING COMPREHEN~VE PLAN MAP D~GNATION: /2..Sf CITY: ZIP: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (W applicable): TELEPHONE NUMBER EXlSTING ZONING: 'R-is CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): NAMEU(\ I 0.Ufr\4- COMPANY (if applicable): ' SITE AREA (in square feet): Z.\,1."l:, =t~ -. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUilC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: l'1. (!,.. \Du"'"' E.'-'L• flQf.r). .Su"-"'· •or"- \J ADDRESS: SQUARE FOOTAGE 0/ 1 PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: N A. (.,C,,3J.. 0 \ "t I s_J. 'R.... E-\C2.... . PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY: ZIP: ACRE (If applicable): (, , i"°{ ~~+--,.\A. NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (W applicable): TELEPHONE NUMBER AND j_AIL ADDRESS: 4'2~. Z'.31-D<,,<,,5 / Vl\\,tcum .... e_c..ol.t.o«\ z.. NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): I I Q:web/pw/devserv/fonns/p[anning/masterapp.doc 09/19/05 • PROJECT INFORMAT;.:.1:..::0:..:..N:....,lL.::,c.::::on:.:.:t:.:..:;in.:.:u:..::e.:::.d,__) ______ ~ NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: I SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED 'ESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): l'1 fl SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): ~it::, IJ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED;:ON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): t,.1 t,.. IJ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO IJ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RE/~DENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): l-1 IJ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDE?IAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): 1,-1 A IJ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. IJ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EM, 1 0YED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): I\J A, IJ WETLANDS sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY /Attach leaal descriDtion on seDarate sheet with the followina information included) SITUATE IN THE SE:-, QUARTER OF SECTION __tl, TOWNSHIP _1:::, RANGEQ.5 IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. "'S>\.,.or+ i1..A1 r .}~O / 12. 3. 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $. ___ _ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) ?A-\:::. lJ N (., ff. J) W(b l) 4 (:, , declare that I am (please cheek on,,)',./ the C<Jrrent owner of the property invoJved in this application or __ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attad, proof of authorization) and that the foregoing state(}id an 1 swers herein contained and the infonnation herewith are in aft respects true and correct to the bes;.et my knowledge and belief. ~ , certify lhet , know or have satisfactory evidence that rA-t'.: u f.l'° 4 DM ,,__, signed this instrument and acknowledged It lo be his/her/their free and voluntary ad for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument . (Signature of owner/Rep "' 0 ~ z ,2 ~ g -' z (!) a:, "' <( ::, z CL ill 0:: i "' I 0: ~ X Notary (Print)~ Qu <( '" ler-d..,v\__, w ~ ~ ts ,. z er: en ~. UJ ~ "' !;j: :ii 0 :> I-z 0 /;).-/0-0j "' '-' My appointment expires: > :> (Signature of Owner/Repr Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/planning/masterapp.d.oc 2 09/19105 . DEVELOPMEm P CITY OF R,...J;.ft.NNING ""ION JAN -8 2008 RECEIVED PRE-APPLICATION COMMENTS PROJECT: Ung Short Plat 1517 Shattuck Ave S PRE 05-030 DATE: March 17, 2005@2:00 p.m. STAFF COMMENTS: FIRE PREVENTION -Jim Gray PUBLIC WORKS/UTILITIES -Mike Dotson CONSTRUCTION SERVICES -Larry Meckling- NO COMMENT PLANNING/ZONING -Nancy Weil SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: ZONING MAP SITE ARIAL SUBMITTAL WAVIER FORM , DATE: TO: FROM: CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM March 10, 2005 Nancy Weil, Senior Planner Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Ung Short Plat, 1517 Shattuck Ave. S Fire Department Comments: l. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single-family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. 2. A fire mitigation fee of $488.00 is required for all new single-family , structures. 3. Fire Department access roadways require a minimum 20 Foot paved roadway. 4. All building addresses shall be visible from the public street Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. To: From: Date: Subject: CITY OF RENTON MEMO PUBLIC WORKS Nancy Weil Mike Dotson March 16, 2005 PreApplication Utility and Transportation Review Comments PREAPP No. 05-030 -Ung Short Plat -1517 Shattuck Ave S NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT: The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City or Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that Information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g. Hearing Examiner, Boards of Adjustment, Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant. We have performed a pre-application review of the information supplied for the subject proposed development. The following information was determined: WATER I. There is an 8" waterline in both Shattuck and Davis Ave South. 2. The modeled fire flow available at the site is approximately 1000 gpm . Static Water pressure is 80psi. 3. The proposed project is located within the 300-water pressure zone. 4. If fire sprinkler systems are necessary, then a separate fire sprinkler permit will be required. 5. All new single-family construction must have a fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of I ,000 gpm and must be located within 300 feet of the structures. There may be one existing fire hydrant in the vicinity that could be counted toward the fire protection for portions of this project. Any existing sub-standard hydrants will need to be replaced and/or retrofitted with a quick disconnect Storz fittings. 6. A Water System development Charge of $1,525.00 per new lot is payable at time of issuance of a construction permit. 7. All short plats shall provide a separate water service to each building lot prior to recording of the short plat. SANITARY SEWER 1. There is an existing 8-inch sewer main in both Davis Ave South and Shattuck Ave South. PreApplication Utility and T ,ortation Review Comments PREAPP No. 1517 ShattuckAveS 03/17/2005 Page 2 30 -Ung Short Plat - 2. From our records, there is an existing sewer stub to the existing home at 1517 Shattuck Ave South, and a sidesewer stub to the garage on Davis Ave South (see attached side-sewer sketch(s)). 3. · All short plats shall provide separate side sewer stubs to each building lot prior to recording of the short plat. No dual side sewers are allowed. Side sewer shall be a minimum 2% slope. 4. The Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges (SDC) is $900 per single family home. This fee is due at the time of the utility construction permit. SURFACE WATER I. This site drains to the May Creek basin. 2. A drainage analysis and design is required to comply with the requirements and standards of ,., the 1990 King County Surface Water design manual. 3. The preferred method of drainage control would be infiltration facilities. 4. The Surface Water System Development Charges (SOC) is $715 per lot. This fee is due at the time the utility construction permit is issued STREET IMPROVEMENTS I. Transportation Mitigation fees are $75 per additional generated trip generated. These fees shall be assessed per new single family home at a rate of9.57 trips. 2, All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Under-grounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. ,, 3. According to City of Renton code, projects that are 2-4 residential lots in size are required to install half pavement width per standards. This project also requires installing curb, gutter and sidewalks, along the both the frontage of both Shattuck Ave South and Davis Ave South. A deferral of these improvements may be requested through the Board of Public Works. 4. Dedication of additional right of way (up to IO feet) along Shattuck Ave South may be required. A determination will be forth coming. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Permit application will required separate plan submittals for all proposed utility, drainage and street improvements. Plans are required to be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer according to City of Renton drafting standards. 2. Permit application must also include an estimated cost of construction for water, sewer and roadway/drainage improvements (please see permit application available at the 6th floor Customer Service Counter). Separate permits for water meters, and side sewers are required. And a separate utility permit to cut and cap existing utilities to existing structures on site will be required as part of the demolition permit. 3. The applicant is responsible for securing any private utility easements. I:\Plan Review\Plan Review 2004\Ung SP.doc DATE: TO: FROM: CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM March 17, 2005 Pre-Application File No. 05-030 SUBJECT: Nancy Weil, Senior Planner, (425) 430-7270 Ung Short Plat General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above-referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first· floor of City Hall or the City website at www.ci.renton.wa.us THIS PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO NEW CITY CODE ADOPTED NOVEMBER 10, 2004 Project Proposal: Applicant is proposing to divide an existing 0.49-acre parcel into 3 lots. The site has one existing residence and one detached garage; a deck is shown on the site plan off the real" of the residence. The parcel has public road frontage along the east property line, Shattuck Ave. S and along the west property line, Davis Ave. S. The existing residence gains access off of Shattuck Ave. S. The zoning is Residential --8 (R-8). According lo the City's Critical Areas Maps, the site may contain sensitive slopes. Zoning/Density Requirements: The subject property is located within the Residential • 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) zoning designation. The density range required in the R-8 zone would be a minimum of 4.0 to a maximum of 8.0 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). The method of calculating net density has been revised in the new code and is as follows: A calculation of the number of housing units and/or lots that would be allowed on a property after critical areas and public rights-of-way and legally rficorded private access easements are subtracted from the gross area (gross acres minus streets and critical areas multiplied by allowable housing units per acre). Required critical area buffers and public and private alleys shall not be subtracted from gross acres for the purpose of net density calculations. An accurate density calculation could not be determined without the determination and square footage of proposed easements and critical area, if any. At the time of formal Land Use Application, applicant would be required to provide accurate density showing all square footages of areas to be deducted (private access easement, public roads and critlcal areas). Staff did a rough calculation for density, based on an estimated square footage of an access easement. Staff also adjusted the proposed lot lines, please reference density worksheet example. The estimate produced a net density of 7 du/ac for 3 lots, which is within the R-8 requirements. " Development Standards: The R-8 zone permits one residential structure/unit per lot. Detached accessory structures are pefmitted at a maximum number of two per lot at 720 square feet each, or one per lot at 1,000 square feet in size. Ung Short Plat March 17, 2005 Pre-Application Meeting Page 2 of4 Minimum Lot Size. Width and Depth -The minimum lot size that would permitted in the R-8 zone is 4,500 sq. ft. for parcels greater than 1 gross acre and 5,000 sq. ft. for parcels less than 1 acre-gross. The site is one (1} acre-gross or less; therefore. a lot size of 5,000 sq. ft. would be required. A minimum Jot width of 50 feet for interior lots and 60 feet for corner Jots, as well as a minimum lot depth of 65 feet, is also required. The proposed layout would be considered a three lot short plat. The parcel is approximately 75 feet width by 280 fe&t length. The applicant proposes Lot 1 fronting Shattuck Ave. S with the existing house to remain, the detached garage may be required to be removed due to new property line of Lot 2. Lot 2 is In the center of the parcel and is show as a pipestem lot. Lot 3 fronts on Davis Ave. S. Lot 2 Is proposed as a pipestem lot. It appears the R-8 density requirements can be met if a 20· foot access easement to Lot 2 is provided rather than a pipestem. Therefore, staff recommends the applicant should remove the pipestem portion of Lot 2. It appears the access easement would be best off of Davis Street, across proposed Lot 3. · Building Standards -The R-8 zone would allow a maximum building coverage of 35% of the lot area or 2,500 square feet, whichever is greater for lots 5,000 square feet in size or greater. Lots less than 5,000 square feet in size would permit a maximum building coverage of 50% of the lot area. Building height is restricted to 30 feet and two stories. Detached accessory structures must remain below a height of 15 feet and one-story with a gross floor area that is less than the primary structure. Accessory structures are also included in building lot coverage calculations. Square footages of buildings to remain, if any, must be provided at the time of formal land use application. Also, any buildings that are to be removed/demolished must obtain a demolition permit and be removed and inspected prior to recording the final plat. Setbacks -Setbacks are the minimum distance required between the building footprint and the property line or private access easement. Setbacks are taken from the private easement line rather than property line on applicable lots. , The required setbacks are 15 ft. for the primary structure and 20 ft. for attached garages accessed from the front yard in the front, 20 ft. in the rear and 5 ft. on interior side yards. The side yards along a street setback is 15 ft. for the primary structure and 20 ft. for the attached garages which access from the side yard along a street. The drawing submitted does not show setbacks. All setbacks are to be shown on the formal land use application plat plan submittal, but must be removed prior to final plat recording. The existing structure, if to remain, must meet current setbacks for rear and side. It appears a deck exists at the rear of the existing structure (Lot 1), if the deck is 18 inches or higher than It must meet the required rear yard setback of 20 feet or be removed or altered. Access/Parking: Access is available from both Shattuck Ave. S and Davis Ave. S. A private easement 20-foot width Is required t(! access the center lot (Lot 2). Private driveways are allowed for access to no more than two Jots not abutting a public right of way. The City Code required minimum of 20-foot width and 12 feet of paving, unless otherwise required by the Fire Department (please reference Fire's comments). Each lot is required to accommodate off street parking for a minimum of two vehicles per lot. In addition, appropriate shared maintenance and access agreement/easements will be required between lots with shared access. Addresses of lots along private streets/driveways are to be visible from the public street by provision of a ~ign stating all house numbers and are to be located at the intersection of the private street and the public street. Driveway Grades: The maximum driveway slopes cannot exceed fifteen percent (15%), provided that driveways exceeding eight i;>ercent (8%} are to provide slotted drains at the lower end of the driveway. If the grade exceeds 15%, a variance from the Board of Adjustment is required. Landscaping and Open Space: For plats abutting non-arterial public streets, the minimum off-site landscaping is a five (5 ft.} wide irrigated or drought resistant landscape strip provided that if there is Ung Short Plat March 17, 2005 Pre-Application Meeting Page 3 of 4 additional undeveloped right-of-way in excess of 5 ft., this also must be landscaped. For plats abutting principal, minor or collector arterials, the width increases to 10 ft. unless otherwise determined by the reviewing official during the subdivision process. Tree requirements for plats include at least two (2) trees of a City approved species with a minimum caliper· of 1 1/2 inches per tree must be planted in the front yard or planting strip of every lot prior to building occupancy. Critical Areas: According to the project information and City's records, the site may contain areas defined as ·sensitive" slopes (ranging from 20% to 40% in slope). Geologic Hazards -Sensitive slopes have grades from 25% to 40%. Specific standards apply for development located within sensitive slopes and landslide hazard areas. Protected slopes are defined as topographical features that slope in excess of 40% and have a vertical rise of 15 feet or more. Development is prohibited on protected slopes, please see RMC 4-3-050J for additional information. As required by the City's Critical Areas Regulations, a slope delineation indicating the location of steep slopes will be required as part of the formal land use application. Pursuant to the Renton Municipal Code (RMC 4-3-050J) the applicant will be required to obtain a geotechnical report stamped and signed from a Geotechnical Engineer stating that the site is suitable for development and addresses soils, geology and other key elements. In addition, the report will need to address any special construction requirements deemed necessary by the Geotechnical Engineer. Through the short plat review process, the City may condition the approval of the development in order to require mitigation of any potential hazards based on the results of the study. In addition, pursuant to RMC section 4-3-050.J.3, the geotechnical report submitted with the application may be required to undergo independent secondary review by a qualified specialist selected by the City at the applicant's expense. Environmental Review: The project may require SEPA review if critical areas are indicated on the site. The proposal would be brought to the Environmental Review Committee for review, as it is their charge to make threshold determinations for environmental checklists. Typically, mitigation of impacts is · accomplished through fees related to issues such as transportation, fire and parks as well as measures lo reduce impacts to environmental elements such as soils, streams, water, etc. If the proposal is reduced to 4 lots or less which requires Administrative Short Plat, the Administrator may determine there are sufficient concerns to warrant a public hearing, and refer the short plat to the Hearing Examiner (RMC 4- 7-0?0H.5). Permit Requirements: Short plats of four or less lots are processed administratively within an estimated time frame of 6 to 8 weeks for preliminary approval. The land use process would be completed within an estimated time frame of 6 to 8 weeks for preliminary short plat approval. The application fee is $1,000.00 for Short Plat (additional $500.00 fee if SEPA review is required) plus $0.37 per mailing label required for notification to surrounding property owners within 300 feet of the site. The applicant will be required to install a public information sign on the property. Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal is provided in the attached handouts. Once preliminary approval is-received, the applicant must complete the required improvements and satisfy any conditions of the preliminary approval before the plat can be recorded. The. newly created lots may be sold only after the plat has been recorded. Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction permit fees, the following mitigation fees would be required prior to the recording of the plat. Credit for the existing residence may be given. • A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project; • A Fire Mffigation Fee based on $488 per new single-family residence. A handout listing all of the .City's Development related fees is included in the packet for your review. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The existing development is located within the Residential Sing_le Family (RSF) Comp'rehensive Plan Land Use designation. The following proposed policies are applicable to the proposal as gwdehnes for design of proposed site: Ung Short Plat March 17, 2005 Pre-Applica6on MeeUng Page 4 of 4 Polley LU-147. Net development densities should fall within a range of 4.0 to 8.0 dwelling units per net acre in Residential Single-Family neighborhoods. Policy LU-148. A minimum Jot size of 5,000 square feet should be allowed on in-fill parcels ofless than one acre (43,560 sq. ft.) in single-family designations. Allow a reduction in lot size to 4,500 square feet on parcels greater than one acre to create an incentive for aggregation of land. The minimum lot size is not intended to set the standard for density in the designation, but to provide flexibility in subdivision/plat design and facilitate development within the allowed density range. Policy LU-149. Lot size should exclude private sidewalks, easements, private road, and driveway easements, except alley easements. Policy LU-150. Required setbacks should exclude public or private legal ac;cess areas, established through or to a lot, and parking areas. Policy LU-154. Interpret development standards to support new plats and infill project designs incorporating street locations, lot configurations, and building envelops that address privacy and quality of life for existing residents. Policy CD-13. Infill development should be reflective of the existing character of established neighborhoods even when designed using different arc;hitec;tural styles, and /or responding to more urban setbacks, height or lot requirements. Infill development should draw on elements of existing development such as placement of structures, vegetation, and location of entries and walkways, to reflect the site planning and scale of existing areas. Additional Comments: In advance of submitting the full application package, applicants are strongly encouraged to bring in one copy of each application material for a pre-screening to the customer service counter to help ensure that the application is complete prior to making all copies. , cc: Jennifer Henning :VELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Calculations, Construction Mitigation Description 2 AND 4 Drainage Control Plan 2 Elevations, Architectura'3ANo • Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy}• ~eighborhood Detail Map 4 fhis requirement may be waived by: I. Property Services Section !_ Public Works Plan Review Section l_ Building Section I_ Development Planning Section Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Forms\Planning\waiver.xls ·.·.·.·.· ·.·.·.·.-_.:.:-:.:-.-:-:-:·.<·.·.·.·. ,.,.,.,.,,.-c ____ o _____ M _____________ , _____ s ____ ,_ ,:::,:::: ,:_ -_ -__ MENT_ ; PROJECT NAME: \)(\ts S\\~L-~ DATE: 3-l]~o5 pv,.NN\NG oEIJEgf~~~~ENTON lM,i _ ?. '2.0C8 rtE.CE\VF.:•J 01/0612004 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISIOI WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS .. LAN:P vs~ P.~~!'t:$:O~MirrAf . W~) )iilqpii=ti:ri •••••••••• .. ••••• REQUIREMENTS:>•••••••••••••• •••••••i3v: •••••••• :••••:•• BY:••<••:•• Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis • Topography Map 3 Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan 4 Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 .................. wei1anc1s Mi ' · ·· · tioo Plair;• i'1iiai '* > •• Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary 4 Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 Map of View Area 2 AND 3 Photosimulations 2 AND 3 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section PROJECT NAME:------------- DATE: ------------- 4. Development Planning Section Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Forms\Planning\waiver.xls 01/06/2004 DENSITY WORKSHEET City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98055 Phone:425-430-7200 Fax 425-430-7231 1 . Gross area of property: 1 21 194 square feet 2. Deduction: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. Public street - Private access easements** Critical Areas* Total excluded area: 2 square feet 3. Subtract Line 2 from line 1 for net area: 3 21 194 square feet 4. Divide lien 3 by 43,560 for net acreage 4 0.487 acres 5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned 5 ---~3 unit/lots 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density 6 6.17 du/acre --~~ * Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways" Critical Areas buffers are not deducted/excluded. ** Alleys (public or private) donor have to be excluded, Project: PAK UNG SHORT PLAT Date 9-Nov-07 DEVELOP ME CITY OF '/J~~~j'./ING .JAN -8 2008 RECEIVED PAK UNG SHORT PLAT PROJECT NARRATIVE The proposed short plat consists of one parcel of land. It contains an area of 21,193 square feet (0.49 Acres). The property is situated in the southwest end of the Cily, approximately 240 feet south of S 15"' Street The parcel is bounded on the east by Shattuck Avenue South, and on the west it is bounded by Davis Avenue S. Access to the property will be from Shattuck Avenne S. or Davis Avenue South. Proposed Lot I will access from Shattuck Avenue South and Lots 2 and 3 will access from Davis A venue South Adjacent street improvements consist of a 24-foot to 28- foot asphalt pavement with dirt shoulder on both sides of the street. Storm sewer, sanitary sewer and water mains exist in adjacent street. The project area is hilly with average slopes of 5 .0% to 15°/o. There are no steep slopes noted on the property. The Cily designates the area with a Single-Family (SF) zoning. This zoning designation allows for a minimum lot size of 5000 square feet and a maximum densily of eight (8) dwelling per units of acre. The setbacks allowed in the SF zone are as follows: front yard, 20 feet; rear yard, 25 feet and side yards, 5 feet on all interior lots, and 15 feet on comer lots. The Cily of Renton Comprehensive Plan designates the site with single family residence. The proposed development of the subject property is consistent with the (SF) zoning requirements. The entire area surrounding the subject property is residential neighborhood, The proposed development would create a total of 3 single family lots with a minimum Jot area of 5000 square feet. The dwelling unit densicy calculates at 6 .17 unit per net developed area. The coverage of the site consists of pastnre land and some overgrown and brushy areas. Mature evergreen and deciduous trees are scattered over the entire property was observed. There are IO existing trees on the property. Based on the Tree Ordinance #5304 we would need to retain 3 trees. Because of proposed building locations and site improvement we would be able to only retain two the existing tree. There will be 6 extra trees planted per Ordinance #5304. The flow of surface water from the site is directed from east to west toward Davis Avenue South. The flow is directed to the north along Davis Avenue to South 15" Street, thence is drains to the west and eventually into the Class I wetland area situated east of SR 167, approximately a quarter of mile from the site. Initial calculation for storm runoff from the site, utilizing 1998 KCSWM, indicates no detentionfacilily is reqnired, thns a control runoffs proposed for this short plat. Traffic circulation and access to the proposed property is Shattuck Avenue S. to the east or Davis Avenue South to the west. NT PLANNING DEV1llii~~ RENTON JAN -8 2008 RECE\VEO CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION PLAN For PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION DATES Pak Ung Short Plat 1517 Shattuck Avenue South Renton, Washington The proposed construction of the private road and utilities on the project will proceed once the final construction drawings are approved by the City of Renton, and all applicable permits are received. This construction will be performed under one contract for the entire development without phasing. Extension of construction time may be required. The construction of the houses will begin after the road and utilities have been completed and accepted by the City. HOURS OF OPERATION The hours of operation will be limited to hours between 8:00 am to 5:00 PM. These hours may be shortened or lengthened with the approval of the City of Renton Department of Public Works. Typically, construction of this nature will occur during the daytime hours, 5 or 6 days a week. PROPOSED HAULING/TRANSPORTATION ROUTES The earthwork anticipated on this project is minimal. The unsuitable material will be disposed on site or hauled away. All vegetation and non-marketable small trees will be chipped and hauled off site to an approved disposal site. Stripping (topsoil) that may be taken from the site area depending on the quality of the material. If the material is acceptable, it may be spread along the front and back of the lots for planting of lawns. In the event disposal of the chipped material is required, then the hauling and disposal will be to an acceptable site, as allowed by the City of Renton. All trees designated to be removed will be cut and removed from the site. The hauling and transportation routes will be mainly via Davis Avenue South to the West of the site and Shattuck Avenue South to the East of the site. The hauling will be limited to excavated access material and new material to be used for construction of the plat improvements. CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION Construction equipment used on this site will be typical backhoes, a small CAT and grader, and roller. The equipment will be used in accordance with the City of Renton requirements. The measures to be implemented to minimize dust, traffic and transportation impacts, mud, noise, etc. will be adhered to during construction. Erosion control measures will be implemented during construction, such as silt fences. Detail erosion plans will be prepared showing control facilities. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON .JAN -8 2GU? Fidelity National Title Company of Washington Underwritten by Fidelity National Title Insurance Company 3500 188th St. SW, Suite 300 DE:vf:L Lynnwood, WA 98037 c,f;!'MENT p (425)771-3031 I Fax No. (425)670-2109 OF FIENT~~/VING Direct Une: (425)640-3510 iA.N , 8 · TO: PREVIEW PROPERTIES, INC 1222 N 185TH #102 SEATTLE, WA 98133 Attention: PAK UNG Your Number: Reference Name: UNG OUR NUMBER: 7-07100194 -Short Plat Certificate Dear Sirs: Toll Free: 1-800-776-3021 200R R .. 3rd Report SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE Premium: Sales Tax: . EC'EJV,:a $ 250.00 $ 22.25 In the matter of the above described Short Plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the record of the County Auditor and County Clerk of King County, Washington, and from such examination hereby certifies that: TITLE TO the following described land is vested in: PAK S. UNG and DARA UNG, husband and wife THE LAND is situated in said King County, and is described as follows: See Attached SUBJECT TO the exceptions shown herein. No search has been made as to the taxes and assessments. THIS CERTIFICATE shall have no force or effect except as a basis for the Certificate applied for. Records examined toDecember 17, 2007 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON ~,-/'---- By: ------"'------------ Terry Sarver, Chief Title Officer FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON Short Plat Certificate, Page 2 of 4 Title Order Number: 7-07100194 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 5, Block 9, C.D. HILLMAN'$ EARLINGTON GARDENS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATILE, DIVISION NO. 1, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, Page(s) 74, records of King County, Washington. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON Short Plat Certificate, Page 3 of 4 Title Order Number: 7-07100194 EXCEPTIONS 1. Lien of any real estate excise sales tax upon any sale of said property if unpaid. The subject property is located in the City of Renton. The excise tax rate is %. 2. DEED OF TRUST AND ADDITIONAL ADVANCES, IF ANY, AND THE TERMS ANO CONDITIONS THEREOF: Grantor: Pak S. Ung, Dara Ung, husband and wife Trustee: LS Title of Washington Beneficiary: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ("MERS") as nominee for Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. Original Amount: $262,500.00, plus interest Dated: December 18, 2006 Recorded: December 21, 2006 Recording No.: 20061221001045 3. QUESTION OF THE EXISTENCE OF AN "AUTOMATIC HOMESTEAD": If the subject property is or will be the residence of a marital community, even though the interest therein may be intended to be held as a separate or community interest, execution of the proposed conveyance, contract to convey, or encumbrance must be by both husband and wife by reason of RCW 6.13 which provides for "automatic homestead." EXECUTION UNDER A POWER OF ATTORNEY WILL NOT PROVE ACCEPTABLE UNLESS FIRST APPROVED BY THIS COMPANY. END OF EXCEPTIONS NOTE 1: The legal description shown in Schedule C was determined from the property address provided at the time of application. The description should be examined and approved by all the parties to this transaction prior to closing. NOTE 2: The following documents were recorded in the last 24 months: None. NOTE3: Examination of the records discloses no judgments or other matters pending against the name of the vested owner(s). NOTE4: The address of the property is: 1517 SHATTUCK AVE SOUTH RENTON, WA 98055 NOTES: FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCS 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Lot 5, Block 9, C.D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Add. Div. No. 1 END OF NOTES . FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON Short Plat Certificate, Page 4 of 4 Title Order Number: 7-07100194 END OF EXCEPTIONS THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER IF WE MAY BE OF FURTHER ASSISTANCE, PLEASE GIVE US A CALL November 23, 2007 Project No. C071102 Pak Ung 19312 -47th Avenue NE Lake Forest Park, WA 98155 Subject: Geotechnical Assessment 3 Lot Short Plat 1500 Block of Shattuck Avenue S Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Ung: Geo Source ENGINEERING, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING Geosource Engineering, Inc. made a visit to the abovementioned site as requested. The purpose of this visit was to conduct a Geotechnical Assessment of the property and present a letter assessing the soil, slope stability conditions, and erosion hazards per the City of Renton Narrative requirements. Authorization Conditions Authorization to proceed with this study was granted by Pak Ung. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Pak Ung and his agents, for specific application to this property. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been performed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering and engineering geology practices in effect in this area at the time our report was prepared. No other warranty, expressed or implied is made. Our observations, findings, and opinions are a means to reduce the geotechnical risks inherent to owning or developing property. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS We looked at the local topography on this and the surrounding properties. The site has a very slight slope downward to the west toward Davis Avenue South. Your property is in the middle of a regional slope which drops gradually to the north. A house and garage were situated near the east-central portion of the property with lawn grasses extending both east to Shattuck Avenue South as well as west to Davis Avenue South. There were a few deciduous trees scattered around the site. 4917 Evergreen Way, Suite 105 Everett. WA 98203 425-870-8189 17320 Red Hawk Ct -Mount Vernon, WA 98274 360-588-4819 C071102, Pak Ung 3 Lot Short Pia . 00 Block of Shattuck Ave. S, Renton, 11123107, P, of 4 GEOLOGIC AND GROUND WATER CONDITIONS Geologic conditions on the parcel were inferred from our visual field reconnaissance, published geologic maps, and past experience in the area. The anticipated soils consisted of the following (from top to bottom): • Fill -Some fill is present around the house and garage. The fill consists of onsite soils spread following construction of the house and the 18 inch cut for the driveway. • Renton Formation (geologic unit Tr) -This material consists of very dense, sandstone. The sand was deposited in saltwater during the early Tertiary period of continent formation and later cemented by calcium carbonate which resulted in a very dense soil, however, the top 2 to 4 feet of this sand has typically been weathered to a medium dense condition. This sand has low permeability characteristics due to its cemented nature. Affective Hydrology Ground water seepage was not observed at the time of our field study. Due to the impermeable nature of the sandstone, rain water seeping into the upper topsoil or weathered sandstone may seep out of any cuts or may show up in utility excavations made for development of the site. Soil Survey Classifications The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) maps classify the surface soils as the Alderwood series (AmC). The NRCS descriptions are agricultural in nature, based mainly on air photo identification of vegetation types growing in the soils. County and City storm water management offices use the NRCS designation for determining design requirements relating to surface water quality and quantity. Thus, geotechnical field evaluation and/or verification of site soils is necessary as the NRCS maps are general in nature. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS It is our opinion that, from a geotechnical standpoint, the parcel appears to be suitable for residential development. Our engineering assessment indicates that conventional spread footings will be capable of providing suitable building support when extended down through any fill or loose native soils. Slope Stability The Geologic Map of the Renton Quadrangle shows a large fault about 1 Y, miles south of this property. This indicates that there are geologic processes which create risk for the owners of this property. There is no way to eliminate risk from sloping properties; it can only be reduced by following Best Management Practices (BMP) and proper engineering recommendations. Part of our assessment was to give our opinion regarding the stability of the slope. In slope stability assessments, the term "stable" is sometimes used C071102, Pak Ung 3 Lot Short Pl 00 Block of Shattuck Ave. S, Renton, 11/23/07, P of 4 inappropriately to indicate the level of risk. In reality, the terms "stable" and "unstable" are actually endpoints on the O to 100% continuum known as the probability of slope movements. Since probability is a difficult concept to comprehend, it is preferable to talk about a level of risk relative to that which is generally considered acceptable in engineering practice rather than stating that a slope is "stable" or not. Level of Risk In comparison to the level of risk that is generally considered acceptable in geotechnical engineering and geologic hazard assessments, it is our opinion that the risk of soil movement which could endanger houses on the proposed lots will be low relative to similar properties in this area. Slopes on the property are gradual and should not be a concern for development. EROSION HAZARDS AND MITIGATION The surficial topsoil and weathered sandstone on the property represents a low to moderate erosion hazard because of the silt content. Silt will tend to cause water to flow across exposed cuts/slopes rather than infiltrate into the ground. The erodability of the underlying, very dense sandstone is considered low. To mitigate and reduce the erosion hazard and offsite sediment transport potential, we recommend the following Best Management Practices (BMP): • Soils which are to be reused around the site should be stored in such a manner as to reduce erosion. Protective measures may include, but are not necessarily limited to, covering with plastic sheeting or the use of hay bales and/or silt fences. • Areas stripped of natural vegetation during construction should be replanted and stabilized as soon as possible. They must also be protected during the interim by plastic sheeting or other means. Straw mulching over hydroseeding, or fiber- reinforced hydroseeding should be used to re-establish ground cover. • All storm water from impermeable surfaces, including paved or concrete driveways and roofs, should be directed into a tightlined City-approved storm water system which discharges away from the property. Onsite infiltration is not expected to be a viable option because of the impermeability of the sandstone. DRAINAGE RECOMMENDATIONS This site will have ground water originating from rain which infiltrates into the upper looser sediments and flows atop the dense sandstone. All retaining and footing walls should be provided with a drain at the bottom elevation of the footings. Drains should consist of thinwall, semi-rigid, perforated HOPE pipe (ASTM:E-180). Drain pipes should be surrounded by washed pea gravel, the pea gravel covered with filter fabric, and the drains constructed with sufficient gradient to allow gravity discharge away from the buildings. Where footing drains are placed on dense soils, the sloping pipe should be set 12 inches out from the footing edge and dug down so the level of the perforations in the pipe will be set a minimum of 2 inches below the bottom of the footing at all locations to reduce the chances of water C071102, Pak Ung 3 Lot Short Pl 00 Block of Shattuck Ave. S, Renton, 11123107, P of 4 flowing under the footing. Block-outs should be placed through the footings at elevations higher than the perforated footing pipe to drain any enclosed foundation areas which can trap water (if crawlspaces are used). Roof and surface runoff should not discharge into the footing drain system but should be handled by a separate. rigid tightline drain. Footing drains may discharge into this tightline provided that they enter the !QQ of the tightline through a "y" connector. This will prevent roof runoff from back-flowing into the footing drains. In planning, exterior grades adjacent to walls should be sloped downward away from the structures to achieve surface drainage. ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS This study was based on field observations and engineering experience coupled with geologic information from our library. No deep subsurface explorations or test borings were authorized for this limited study. What cannot be determined from a visual Geotechnical Assessment is the actual condition of the soils at depth. The legal concept of Standard of Care requires that we inform you that additional. deep subsurface explorations would provide valuable knowledge and information regarding this property which could reduce the risks to the owner. We are available to discuss and provide additional services if desired. We can provide engineering consultation, geotechnical review of the plans, and construction inspections. In this way, our earthwork and foundation recommendations may be properly interpreted and implemented in the design and construction. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Geosource Engineering, Inc. Gary T. Lobdell. P.E., PG. Professional Engineer, Professional Geologist Principal PREPARED BY TOUMA ENGIN""EERS 6632 SOUTH 191ST PLACE, SUITE E-102 KENT, WA 98032 ( 425) 251-0665 June I, 2007 -1 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON JAN -8 2008 RECEIVED TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PROJECT OVERVIEW & FIGURES IL CORE AND SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS III OFF-SITE ANALYSIS IV. FLOW CONROL V CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS VI. EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN -2 I. PROJECT OVERVIEW The proposed short plat consists of one parcel of land. lt contains an area of21,193 square feet (0.49 Acres). The property is situated in the south end of the City, approximately 240 feet south of S 151h Street. The parcel is bounded on the east by Shattuck Avenue South, and on the west it is bounded by Davis Avenue S. Access to the property will be from Shattuck Avenue S. or Davis 1 Avenue South. Proposed Lot I will access from Shattuck Avenue South and Lois 2 and 3 will access from Davis Avenue South. Adjacent street improvements consist of a 24-foot to 28-foot asphalt pavement with dirt shoulder on both sides of the street. Storm sewer, sanitary sewer and water mains exist in adjacent street. The project area is hilly with average slopes of 5.0%. There are no steep slopes noted on the property. The proposed development would create a total of 3 single family lots with a minimum lot area of 5000 square feet. The dwelling unit density calculates at 6.8 unit per net developed area. The coverage of the site consists of pasture land and some overgrown and brushy areas. Mature evergreen trees are scattered over the entire property was observed. The flow of surface water from the site is directed from east to west toward Davis Avenue South. The flow is directed to the north along Davis Avenue to South 15 1h Street, thence is drains to the west and eventually into the Class I wetland area situated east of SR 167, approximately a quarter of mile from the site. Initial calculation for storm runoff from the site, utilizing 1998 KCSWM, indicates no detention facility is required, thus a control runoffs proposed for this short plat. Traffic circulation and access to the proposed property is Shattuck Avenue S to the east or Davis Avenue South to the west. -J IJ. PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY CORE REQUIREMENTS 1-5 CORE REQUIREMENT #I: DISCHARGE AT NATURAL LOCATION The allowable outflows from the site will be discharged to its natural locations. CORE REQUIREMENT #2: OFF-SITE ANALYSIS A level one downstream analysis is a portion of this report. See the analysis later in this report below. CORE REQUIREMENT #3: RUNOFF CONTROL The increased peak runoff, due to any change in pervious conditions and increase of impervious areas, will be attenuated using peak rate runoff control in accordance with KCSWMI 990 Edition. There will no detention facility required since the peak difference between pre-developed and post-developed conditions, for a 100-year, 24-hour storm, is less than 0.5 cfs. Please refer to attached calculation. CORE REQUIREMENT #4 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM There will be no conveyance system proposed for this short because existing facilities on Davis Avenue South will intercept runoff generated from the site and directs the flow north toward South I S'h Street. CORE REQUIREMENT #5 EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN The erosion control plan will be designed using the King County storm manual. A series of filter fabric fences and sediment traps if required will be implemented during construction of short plat improvements in order to minimize any impact to downstream areas. -4 SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: THOSE APPLICABLE TO PROJECT 1. Critical Drainage Area -N/ A 2. Compliance with existing Master Drainage Plan -N/ A 3. Conditions Requiring Master Drainage Plan -N/ A 4. Adopted Basin or Community Plans -NI A 5. Special Water Quality Controls-NIA 6. Coalescing Plate Oil/Water Separators -NI A 7. Closed Depressions -NIA 8. Use of Lakes, Wetlands, or Depressions for Detention -NI A 9. Delineation of 100 Year Flood Plain -N/ A 10. Flood Protection for Type 1 and 2 Streams -NI A 11. Geotechnical Analysis and Report -NI A 12. Soils Analysis and Report -NI A -5 III. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS CORE REQUIREMENT #2: OFF-SITE ANALYSIS LEVEL I ANALYSIS A: UPSTREAM ANALYSIS This proposed short plat does not have off-site runoff entering the site. The otfsite runoff in intercepted by existing stonn facility situated on Shattuck Avenue directing the flow away from the site., B: DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS The site runoff is directed to open ditches and underground culvert along the Davis Avenue South. The flow is directed north to existing storm system on South l S'h Street. Thence the flow is directed to the west, and eventually into the Class I wetland area situated east of SR 167, approximately a quarter of mile from the site. -6 IV. FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY The following calculations conclude that the I 00-year peak flow difference between the pre-developed flow and post-developed flow is less than 0.5 cfs. In accordance with 1990 King Count Surface Water Drainage Manual detention is not required. The following calculations include: Basin areas Time of Concentration Isopulvial graphs for 2, 10 and 100 year storms Pre-developed and Post-developed hydrographs Water quality is not considered in this report, since the impervious PGIS surfaces is less than 5000 square feet. BASIN AREA ANALYSIS TOTAL AREA ACCESS \\ 21193 sf 1986 sf 19207 sf SOIL TYPE Alderwood AgC Type ,1c,1 EXISTING CONDITIONS IMPERVIOUS PERVIOUS HOUSE DRIVEWAY GARAGE GRASS -7 950 1255 405 2610 18583 0.44 ACRES 0.06 ACRES CN 0.43 ACRES CN 98 86 POST CONDITIONS-EAST SUB-BASlN IMPERVIOUS 2NEWHOMES 8000 EX HOUSE& DRWY 3205 11205 0.26 ACRES CN 98 PERVfOUS LANDSCAPING 10205 0.23 ACRES CN 86 TIME OF CONCENTRATION -PRE DEVELOPMENT-FOR 10-YEAR, 24-HOUR STOI DESIGN EAST SUB-BASIN SHEETFLOW- OFFSITE MANNING-n OVERLAND-L PRECIPITATION-P SLOPE-S Tl 0.15 285 FEET 2.9 INCH 015 FT/FT MINUTE 10.63 S TIME OF CONCENTRATION -POST DEVELOPMENT -FOR 10-YEAR, 24-HOUR ST1 DESIGN SINCE TIIBRE WILL BE A SHORT SHEET FLOW RUNOFF ANTICIPATED THE TIME OF CONCENTRATION USED IS THE MINIMUM OF 6.3 MINUTES -8 1 -S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 -7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 -STORM DATAFILE S.C S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 100,24,3. 90 ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION******************** ********* JOO-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.90" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 0.43,86,0.06,98, 11 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .5 .4 86.0 .1 98.0 11.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .32 7.83 4627 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH c:ex SPECIFY: C -CONTINUE, N -NEWSTORM, P -PRINT, S -STOP C ENTER A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 0.26,86,0.23,98,6.30 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) ACNACN .5 .3 86.0 .2 98.0 6.3 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-Fn .39 7.67 5377 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: -9 V. CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS There will be no conveyance system proposed for this site at this time. -10 VI EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL Temporary Erosion Sedimentation Control Plan is minimal, and it will consists of constructing filter fabric fences and quarry spalls, as required during construction of driveway to the new lot .. -11 AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 96055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) COUNTY OF KING ) ENT PLANNING DEV1£i~'t,F RENTON !AN -8 2008 ~ECE\\IEO ...,....,.../--=1)~)tvJ...:... .....-..·-(Q~--'-/..:..~=®(l_.__--='-· __,__' ________ ,, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: 1. On the 5l2 day of &-( , , 2oil.._, I installed _j_ public information sign(s) and plastic flyer box on the property located at -,----------------for the following project: f5rz __ ~,+ves, £AtL Stf«?CflA;----n, Project name . ?6:-k (,)})& Owner Name 2. I have attached a copy of the neighborhood detail map marked with an "X" to indicate the location of the installed sign. 3. This/these public lnformatiOIY"<""n locations in conformance with the requ Code. was/were constructed and installed in Ch r 7 Title 4 of Renton Municipal My commission expires on _ __..6???=._,/ ... ,'/ __ _ C,\Oucumencs and Settings\jaynalLocal Settings\Temporary Internet Flles\OLI00\Publlc Sign ln<tallatlon Affldavic of Pot:clng (2).dOC 10/12/07 "r;~ cc- t=:O:::l 1 / 4 CORNER I FOUND PK AND SHINER ,,-0.05· NORTH Of UNE S 15TH STREET 1;,::,·.r\01,,::_,,·, ,,._.;~:..,,..11, ,:,; .. --; ..)0uJ\·, ,~;;-._ :, .... ,,.._.. ME1HOD USED: FIELD TRAVERSE WITH ACTUAL N FIELD MEASUREMENTS AND ANGLES ~I[) WAC 332-130-090 !2 DA TE OF SURVEY, APRIL 2005 o BASIS OF BEARING, S 15th SlREET (N B9-S3'48"W) O CITY OF RENTON MON #659 CR MON f 476 FOUND BRASS PIN IN CONC ) FOUND 1 /'[ PIN IN IN PIP[ INTER. OF S PUGET DR & CONCRETE IN CASE \ BENSON DR S (5/05) NTER. SHATTVCK AVES N • 173222.6096 I {:AND S 1:'>th STREET (04/05) E"' 1.30044. 7.8845 N = 173226.5860 EL : 85 46' z E -1299292.0208 • ""' -1 •? ""' . -----r \ 8 ,: N89'53'48"W (B~S Of BEARING} 410.11 (M) 410.00' (P) 8 ~ T;.. ...,,... a11' (m) 515.SJ (W) 8 g I \,ooo \ \ \ ' I \ \ A ~,. -I \lo\--- 9, ~ i I i I I I I I _J I REN SP~14-79 I B I I --~--_J 7912149008 C 2 i I l I I I D I I I ____ _J ____ i-~ ~\ ; \ i\ ~ \----- "\ EX S'ffiUGTURES TO BE REMO'JED ~ f ' I r: V ~ \ ~~'- "'· I \ \ 29;1.09' 173.22' 97.7.f_ N 89'53'-48" W ~ LOT 3 lll; :8 ~ 0 ~ 8406' LOT 2 "' _, GARA 'v, ~. -J vaon _I c ~[_CK _ I ' -:::-,.R 273.41' N89"53' 48"W . N <D o:i 6 () 0 r-: "' ~ '.l .::} .;-;! f!1~ 118.87 LOT 1 -69.08' ? t >' _AND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE OWNER r i PAK UNG 30.oo· 1.2. 19312 4 7TH A VE. NE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98155 206-542-2171 LDT 1 ENGINEER / SURVEYOR I LUA-95-030-SHPL TOUMA ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 6632 S 191st PLACE SUITE E -102 ~ KENT. WASHINGTON 98032 (/J ,. ----:;'1 (425) 251-0665 1 ~ SHORT PLAT DATA ~ ~ ~ TOTAL SHORT PLAT AREA 21.194 sq. ft. si • 1 LDT 2 NUMBER OF LOTS PROPOSED -3 ::is:: c4 g ZONE = R-8 U g SMALL LOT AREA = 5000 sq. ft. ;:, ,n DENSITY = 6.80 DU/ACRE ~ I ~1 __ __ PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE OF NE LOTS I I 1 -9,208 s f. UJ 2 -7.004 s. f. (Net 5,000 s.f.) LUA-94-151-SHPL 3 -5.000 S, t I M #9511079004 SEJ13ACKS' ~ LOT 3 FRONT = 20 FT. "" REAR = 20 FT. '°·°' , 1 SIDE YARD = 5 FT. LEGAL DESCRIPnON r LOT 5, BLOCK 9 OF C.D HILLMAN'S EARUNGTON I GARDENS A0Dlll0N TO THE CllY OF SEA TTlE, DIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT lHEREOF, RECORDED IN I VOLUME 17 OF PLATS. PAGE 74, IN KING COUNlY, r I 1, WASHINGTON LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH LI 26.78 L2 23.06 L3 26.76 BEARING soo·OG'l2"\I s21·34'26"\J s.01·36'421 \J w 0 <( Q. ' _j ~ This map correctly represents a survey made :,y r:~e or u~der my direction ir, conformance ~ TOUMA ENGINEERS PAK SHORT PLAT 1517 SHATTUCK AVENUE S RENTON, WA 98055 ,., ,t-, :ne requirements of the S"Jrvev Reco,.dino t,...'? ·-ec:'..Jest of /~'.JV Uro , -WEST VAUEY EXECUTIVE PARK DWN B'"' DA.TE J'.)8 NO. • -_< ~, Printed: 0\-08-2008 Payment Made: CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUAOS-002 Receipt Number: Total Payment: 01/08/2008 01 :27 PM 1,000.00 Payee: DARA & PAK UNG Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat Payments made for this receipt Trans Payment Method Check Description #9266 -------------------------- Account Balances Trans Account Code Description 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 Amount 1,000.00 Amount 1,000.00 Balance Due .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 R0800100 SHORT PLAT NO.----- CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON SURVEY NOTES INSTRUMENT: TOPCON GPT 3000W TOTAL STATION METHOD USED: FIELD TRAVERSE WITH ACTUAL FIELD MEASUREMENTS AND ANGLES WAC 332-130-090 DA TE OF SURVEY: APRIL 2005 BASIS OF BEARING: S 15th STREET (N 89"53' 48"W) FOUND PK AND SHINER I · 0.05' NOR'TH OF LINE S 15TH STREET \ \ b 0 g N89"53'48"W 410.11 {M) 410.00' (P) (BASIS OF BEARING) ,. b 0 d I') 30.00· i i i l~w \ \ \ A : REN SP414-79: 791214900& : I : B : 2 c : ···-·-_» . . ... -. / en 1 \0 \----_l ____ _l ____ _l ______ ~ ~ ~~ . ~~ ~ -I u (/> '? "' =:, 1,. IJ) \ t --------.-----------1~ <1> t3L,K,9 . EX STRUCTURES .TO BE REMOVED \ LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH BEARING Ll 26.78 S00"06'12 1 \./ L3 26.76 so1~36'42·\./ CR MON # 476 FOUND 1 /2" PIN IN CONCRETE IN CASE NTER. SHA TTIJCK A 1/f. S AND S 15th STREET (04/05) N = 173226.5860 E = 1299292.0208 EL = 132.86' RECORDING NO. VOL./PAGE ~ o m ~ ~ 1~ SCALE: ~-J- PORTION OF NW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SEC 19. TWN 23 N. RG 5 E. W. -. LUA-XX-XXX-SHPL LND-XX-XXX CITY OF RENTON MON #659 FOUND BRASS PIN IN CONC. IN PIPE INTER. OF S PUGET DR & BENSON DR S (5/05) N = 173222.6096 E = 1300447.8845 EL = 85.48' I N89'48'1 O"W 1155.871' (CR) 1155.80 (Iii) 8 LEGEND 1.2 LDT 1 I I 3: LUA-95-030-SHPL : -.. c-.i , --.. ---. -··-~ r ---- t'"> I .,.. .. 0 en I/ ,,, ,,~ ,' / I LOT 2 LUA-94-151-SHPL #9511079004 LOT3 0 I') .. ' . e DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN * CONIFER TREE TO REMAIN ® DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED @ CONIFER TREE TO 8£ REMOVED C) HEDGE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON -· JAN= 8 2008 !RECEIVED w G <( Cl.. "' . ..J ~ jg TOUMA £NGIN££RS PAK SHORT PLAT TOPOGRAPHY AND TREE SURVEY WEST VALLEY EXECUTIVE PARK DWN. BY DATE 6632 SOUTH 191ST PLACE. SUITE E-102 • KENT, WA 98032 DAN T. AUGUST, 2007 JOB NO. 950-001-071 PHONE {425) 251-0665 FAX (425) 251-0625 1--------1--------+--------t CHKD. BY SCALE SHEET 1 1 MHT NOTED OF RECORDING NO. VOL./PAGE SHORT PLAT NO.----- CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON 40 0 20 <40 80 160 .. ,., .. ,.,._,, .· .. ,:. .. . :.·,··' \ ··~· ISSl SURVEY NOJES INSTRUMENT: TOPCON GPT 3000W TOTAL STATION METHOD USED: FIELD TRAVERSE WITH ACTUAL FIELD MEASUREMENTS AND ANGLES WAC 332-130-090 DA TE OF SURVEY: APRIL 2005 BASIS Of BEARING: S 15th STREET (N s9•53• 48"W) CR MON # 476 FOUND 1 /2" PIN IN CONCRETE IN CASE NTER. SHA TIU CK A VE S SCALE: PORTION OF NW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SEC 19, TWN 23 N, RG 5 E. W. LUA-XX-XXX-SHPL LND-XX-XXX CITY OF RENTON MON #659 FOUND BRASS PIN IN CONC. IN PIPE INTER. OF S PUGET DR & BENSON DR S (5/05) N = 173222.6096 FOUND PK AND SHINER I 0.05' NOR1H OF LINE S 15TH STREET AND S 15th STREET (04/05) N = 173226.5860 E = 1299292.0208 EL = 132.86' E = 1300447.8845 EL = 85.48' • _:.,~----~·-· \ b 0 d ,.., A \ I I I I REN I N89"53'48"W. 410.11 (M) 410.00' (P) (BASIS OF BEARING) I I I SP414-79 I B I 791214900& C I I I I I I -I 2 I D .. , . ' b 0 g 11.2 I ~ " ~ N89'48'1 O"W 1155.871' (CR) 1155.60 (M) LDT 1 LUA-95-030-SHPL LDT 2 -.. 8 d I') . ·- LEGEND ® EX SSMH ' a EX CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 @ EX CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 X WATER VAL \IE" -¢ FIRE HYDRANT EB WATER METER (9 IRRIGATION VAL \IE" ~ WATER BLOW OFF DJ TELEPHONE CABINET ·· __ . !NI . _CML£JY. CABINET~_ N · GAS VAL vE" a GAS METER ([) TELEPHONE MANHOLE CfJ POWER VAULT 0 UGHT POL£ -YARD UGHT 0 MON/ TOR/NG WEU ~ PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON POLE ASPHALT ~ I T-fL 1TP ..o.. SIGN DRIVE .;1 \ G) I.fl ---., \ ' LUA-94-151-SHPL #9511079004 \ (/)_ EX STRUClURES ~ LOT 3 z\ o 4 TO BE REMOVED \ r--... \2 ---i:;p,A'f(L ---fARACi[ J WH • Q '° ') ! 30.73 __ milv~ --292.09' N89~3' 48"W \ -ASPH ,"\\ -.;,--r DRI'![ ' -) :r, 1 173.22' 118.87 ) ----\ff, v{ 1 r -M O I \ \ 97.76• I -l -... 0 ·--------I tJ\i\ · A'>PHALT 1 1j \ N 89'53'48" W . ·; '-~ARAG......__, . -I'-DRIVE VM IJ} ..\. . ~ \ 3: LOT 2 --·--,.,.,. -------1 V) \ . -, -1~-~1 . \ -\' \ • N I LOT J g :J" · I I iri ~ r --, ~ HOU SE i · \,... YJ, \ io :.. 20.0 , 978sqft I ,., \ o .-. I\JOOD I 6 08' 1 v, ...J 11..n_EcKJL___I ___ --9. --__ ,...... ,~\ \ \\ • I GRAV[l. \..{\ DRIVE \ \ I\. -- \ \\ -----.......r--I I , "'P:.Jr,L-1 I S.F.R .. ·--' \ !a,:, • ,n \"' 1 ,t -_DRIV~ ..--------L-I N-E--T-A_B_L_E ____ __, ' \ '2) "\ "\ 84.06' 273.41' N89~3' 48"W N <O . <X) LINE LENGTH BEARING Ll 26.78 L2 23.06 ; L3 26.76 SOl 0 36' 42'\J . --- ASPH I DRIVE ---- I 5 1 j pp . <? ~ TOUMA ENGINEERS WEST VALLEY EXECUTIVE PARK ..!LA.. TWO POST SIGN IZI TRAmc JUNCTION BOX -o-UTILITY POL£ E-GUY POLE o MAIL BOX q::cG ROCKERY -$ MON IN CASE @ SURFACE BRASS MONUMENT ~ PK NAIL O FOUND REBAR &: CAP OR IRON PIPE __ w EX WATER LINE --ss-EX SANITARY SEWER UN£ --so EX STORM LINE -a o-IRON FENCE DWN. BY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON JAN .. 8 2008 RECEIVED PAK .SHORT PLAT UTILITIES PLAN DATE w (.'.) <( 0.... "-. ...J 0 > •. .~ ' ' JOB NO. 950-001-071 6632 SOUTH 191ST PLACE. SUITE E-102 • KENT, WA 98032 DAN T. AUGUST, 2007 PHONE (425) 251-0665 FAX (425) 251-0625 1-------...... --------+--------t SCALE SHEET 1 1 MHT NOTED OF --=------,---~---------1~~~~~;zm~~L-----------------1L_......:.:.:..:_ ___ -1, ___ :.__ ____ ..1-___ ~~---..J CHKD. BY EXPIRF.S « .,. »,' -'""~· · ..•. · -,, .,,-,,., -·-·, .. ,------------------------...------------------------··------------------------.,-------------------------------- SHORT PLAT NO.----- CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CERTIFICATION APPROVALS: PARKS, PLANNING & RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Examined and approved this __ day of -----20· __ -·-------·--------------Manager, Building & Land Development Division Examined and approved this __ day of -----20 __ Development Engineer DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS RECORDING NO. VOL./PAGE Examined and approved this __ day of ____ __;, 20 __ Assessor SCALE: Deputy Assessor PORTION OF Account Number _3_3_4_o_4_o_-_1_4_3_5 ___ _ NW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SEC 19, TWN 23 N, RG 5 E. W.~ KNOW ALL PEOPLE BY THESE PRESENTS that we, the undersigned owners· of interest in the land hereby short subdivided, do hereby moke o short subdivision therefore declare this mop to be the graphic representation t-----------------------------------------------L------------------------------...1 of the some, and that short subdivision is mode with the free consist and in accordance with the desire of the owners IN WITNESS WHEREOF we set our hands and seals. Nome Nome ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Stote of Washington County of----------- 1 certify thot I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged It to be (his/her) free ond voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Signature of Notary Public ---------- Dated ------------ My appointment expires ------- ' Stote of Woshington -..· .; ·r.;. County of----------- 1 certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses <ind purposes mentioned in the instrument. ., -+,f Signature of Notary Public ---------- Doted REC. #9809039003 .. My appointment expires ------- \-40? S \ 4-1\-\ SiR££i . (/) ?: ~ S 15TH STREET ~ en Q: l5 ::!: en ~ <( Vl iE a:: 0 ::i: ' (/) ·' " ,· S 19TH STREET . RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE No. Filed for record this. __ day of ___ ,20_ at. __ in book. __ of ___ at page. __ _ at the request of Mounir H. Touma Mgr. Supt. of Records tlJ LEGEND 1B EX. MON IN CASE ~ LUA-XX-XXX-SHPL LND-XX-XXX . - ,• -· • SURFACE BRASS MONUMENT o FOUND REBAR & CAP OR IRON PIPE • SET 1/2" REABR & CAP LS /9470 38i FNO PK NAIL + S£Cn0N CORNER t:::Q::::I 7 / 4 CORNER FOUND PK AND SHINER / 0.05' NORTH OF LINE S 15TH STREET ~ css:1 SCALE 1,,-50' SURVEY NOTES INSTRUMENT: TOPCON GPT 3000W TOT AL ST A llON -0 0 • LO 0 -.:;t- w -METI-100 USED: FIELD TRAVERSE WITH ACTUAL N FIELD MEASUREMENTS AND ANGLES Y) I WAC 332-130-090 LO DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL 2005 ~ 0 BASIS OF BEARING: S 15th STREET (N 59•53• 48 .. W) o z "'\ \ -------------------------------,·"1 \ • '!,Q.<YJ \ \ I \ b 0 g \ \ A . . . . . ... - '-\. ~ N89.53' 48"W (BASIS OF BEARING) 410.11 (M) 410.00' (P) ,· .. · r---_,,-,,. • _ 1. : I I I I I I I REN SP414~79 I I _J_ 8 I •-t'· ·<'.! ~~~"'-"'-~-'-.. -. -I --. _._J_ I 7912149008 C 2 I I I I I I -~· . _l __ ]) b 0 ci .., CJ) ,/ r ( . 11.2~ . ·O 0 If) CR MON # 476 FOUND 1 /2-PIN IN CONCRElE IN CASE NTER. SHATTUCK AVE S AND S 15th STREET (04/05) N = 173226.5860 E = 1299292.0208 EL -132.86' OTY OF RENTON MON f659 FOUND BRASS PIN IN CONC. IN PIPE INlER. OF S PUGET DR & BENSON DR S (5/05) N = 1732226096 E = 1300447.6845 EL = 85.48' -. .._ NW-48"1 rt'W 1155.871' (CR} 1155.80 (t.i) LDT 1 b 0 ci .., --- OWNER PAK UNG 19312 47TH AVE. NE SEA TILE, WASHINGTON 98155 206-542-2171 ENGINEER / SURVEYOR . '• ·-. LUA-95-030'-SHPL TOUMA ENGINEERS & LANO SURVEYORS 6632 S 191st PLACE SUITE E -102 KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 --- LDT 2 , · (425)-251-0665 . SHORT PLAT DATA TOT AL SHORT PLAT AREA 21.194 sq. ft. NUMBER OF LOTS PROPOSED -3 ZONE = R-8 SMALL LOT AREA = 5000 sq.ft . DENSITY -6.80 DU/ ACRE l?~K.9 4 ,~ I PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE OF NE LOTS . . . . 1 -. 9,208 s f. 2 -7,004 s. f. (Net 5,000 s.f.} 3 -5,000 s. f. ' \ fARAGE J EX STRUCTURES TO BE REMOVED LUA-94-151-SHPL I~ #95~ SETBACKS: FRONT = 20 FT. REAR = 20 FT. SIDE YARD = 5 FT. ~ l _'30.73_ ~~------------2_s_2_.0_9_· __ N_s_s_·s_3 ___ ' 4.s .. ·.,.w~-J----1--~~.-------..---'J0.01 _ \ ~ ig 173.2.'l' r -M [7 O 118" 870 r--'--LEGAL DESCRJPnON ·-· . tP 1 ~ -· 97.76' LOT 2 I -' I ~ LOT 5, BLOCK 9 OF C.D HILL.MAN'S EARLINGTON <-"~ \ N 89'53'48" W L§.ARAG LJ r-..... LOT 1 " I GARDENS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEA TILE, DIVISION I ~ ~ \ I I ~ <J\ LOT 3 . ~ -..J \ -1 1 • VOLUME 17 OF PLATS, PAGE 74, IN KING COUNTY, ----.; • g-. ~ :" a. WASHINGTON (>) • "' HOUSE TD l -ll';. ~. . ,; , , ' · 18 !') 20. Q ' --~1 REMAIN 84.06' r -s.r.Rl \ o .,... l'w'OOD I 97t8sqft I 69.08' (/J ...J I DECK I L,__J ------L ___ J -- s:~ .,,. 273.41' Ns9·53' 4a•w _f N CD . (X) 6 1 ""' nA' r ------I I S.F.R. I LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH Ll 26.78 L2 23.06 L3 26.76 BEARING s21°34'26'\,/ CITY O ... F..,__, • 1 r-~NNING RENTON JAN -8 2008 w (.') <{ a.. '-... -. ....J 0 > LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE ., " " ·'--'-' ., •'-'- PAK SHORT PLAT This map correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of the Survey Recording Act at the request of Pak Ung n August, 2007 Certificate No. 9470 I .\Y\ .'\.' '' ·'\.'\ • .,,,, u J jg TOUMA £NGIN££RS 1517 SHATIUCK AVENUE S RENTON, WA 98055 WEST VALLEY EXECUTIVE PARK DWN. BY DATE 6632 SOU1H 191ST PLACE. SUITE E-102 • KENT, WA 98032 DAN T. · AUGUST, 2007 JOB NO. 950-001-071 PHONE (425) 251-0665 FAX (425) 251-0625 .,_ _______ ....., ________ ,._ _______ __. CHKO. BY SCALE MHT NOTED SHEET 1 1 OF -.. ~ D. 0 [ .. D. . -··-----.---·-·-. \ 6" CAL. PRUNUS DOMESTICA ~-------8" PRUNUS DOMESTICA ITALIAN FRlJNE (REMOVE. CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED DRIVE) ITALIAN F!-aJNE-----------, <REMOVE -IN CONFLICT WITH DRIVE) ..-----8" FRUNUS DOMESTICA ITALIAN PRUNE (REMOVE--IN CONFLICT WITH ~POSED DRIVE> BLK.9 ,.-------EXISTING, SCREEN PLANTING TO REMAIN . PRUNE AND GsROOM AS REQUIRED. 6" FR!.INUS DOMESTICA ITALIAN PRUNE (REMOVE ------, IN CONFLICT WITH DRIVE) ,)/ /j 124 / - 0 "' I --. --. / --. 30.73 I ro GA,F¥,GsE I /!:j L--__ J/ I I 113.22' r--14" FRUNUS DOMESTICA ITALIAN PRUNE (REMOVE. CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED DRIVE) I I i / 2':12~' "&3''48<W I / . -. 656L / 4 • I I ---EXISTING. ROCK RETAINING WALL TO REMAIN # I 30.01 \ ,..,,..,,_. -I. ,.. / \o)P· • # 9511079004 LOT3 ;r-· -~-;: · --:;i·~w· ------------/ / / • / / / ;lOT 1 / / ..- ----\ / '(),"', I / ..- \ \ \28 -- ,. / / . / ,----7 -. // I • ./ 1· I I I 121 ...---..1. / . I ('/ I I I / / 0 !!) 112'" MALLIS SPP/ AFFLE <REMOVE --IN CONFLICT---' WITH 6UILDINC.J '----12" FRUNUS FF. FRUITING CHERRY (DEAD) (RECOMMEND REMOVAL) --1 I 63 I r------- r----, 1 SF.R 14" MALLIS SPF. APPLE (REMOVE.-~ CONFLICT WITH BLDGJ EXIST ING 14" PRUNUS SPF.----' FRUITING CHERRY (RECOMMEND SAVE AND ~TECTJ LEGEND Ill. ~ I JS" PSEUDOTSUQA · TAXIFOLIA - (DOUGLAS FIR> (REMOVE. CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED 6UILDINGJ 1 •. REMOVE &" CAL. FOFULUS SPP. SEEDLING LOCATED TOO CLOSE TO HOUSE FDN. S,F.R, '--EXISTING WOOD SCREEN FENCE AND CONC. RETAINING. WALL ON EAST WEST PROPERTY LINE EXISTING, TREES AND PLANTS TO BE PROTECTED AND SAVED EXISTING TREES WITH 6" CAL. OR LARGER AT D.6.1-1.TO JSE REMOVED BSBL BUILDING SET 6ACK LINE / / 1 \ \ __ ,,, '--'---,,,'"'-,, EXISTING &' HIGH L--EXISTINQ FRONT-~ YARD LAWN AND PLANTING. TO REMAIN. PRUNE AND GROOM AS REQUIRED. -- ' • CONC.6LOCK SCREE.N WALL 20 0 20 40 60 !!CILii~----, 1======-=--.,1 Seo.le• 1• = 20' CLEARING ANP §RAPING NOTES: I. PRIOR TO ANY CLEARING OR GRADING. INSTALL A PROTECTION FENCE ENCOMPASSING THE DRIP LINE OF THE TREE (S) TO BE SAVED. 2. REMOVE UNWANTED VEGETATION AND DISPOSE OFF SITE. 3. GRUB AND DISFOSE OF OFF SITE ALL ROOTS FROM LOM6ARDY FOFLARS INVADING THIS SITE. 4. SAVE EXISTING TOPSOIL ADEQUATE IN QUANTITY TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM 12" DEPTH OF FRIABLE PLANTING SOIL IN ALL LAWN AND PLANTING AREAS. LECi!AL DESCFslFTIQN, LOT &, 61.0CK ':l, C.D. HILLMAN'& EAFsLINCifTON Ci!ARDEN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE, DIYl510N "I, ACCOROINc;, TO THE THE FLAT THEFsEOF. SECOFsDED IN YQJ..UHE IJ OF FLAre. FME 14, FsECOFsD5 OF KIN<il COUNTY, UJA5HINGTON. TAX "334"412'-143!:o-12'8 SITE ADDfsESS -"1&11 SHATTUCK AYE. S, PAK UNG l':l312 -41TH. AVE. N.E. SEATTLE, WA ':ISi&& TEL. (212'6) -&42 - ,,., r ,-,,-~ •• ,.,,,,,.,,,-.··· "' --~~~~~==c=~~~~~~cc.0-·c,· <===~·-•=··~'. -~--~ · .. __ .. , ...... >, ·~· ~-· , _,,:L·ei,.,____:a "' _•,. ' '-~ '"·=~~~~=· ·=··--,~_,,_,, .. ,,wen,--··-··w-·-m•,y.1\/'U~·" . .,-, .. ,.."·--·~----.,-.. ·"· ---==================··cc·ccc· -'=-~=, ===''~-"1. ,· ·· -· :i__:i-'--"--"""-'' ,.,. · PAK SHORT PLAT 1511 Shattuck Ave. So. Renton, WA '381Z>SS Edlund Ae.sociatee., inc. landscape architecture 1&00& SE lllet PO Box &80':l':l . Renton, WA ':lW&S ( 425,) 25,5,-5,126 ( 42&! 2&&-4210 F edlundaeeoc1atee,tilcomcaet.net ----· STATE Cf' WA6HIN6TON REC'.:115 TERE:D LA.NOSCAFE ARC141TE'CT GERALD EDLUND CERrlFICATE NO. e1 -... PROJECT NUMSEFa: e>1-e>S1 DA Te, ll/2i&/2e>c2'>1 DRAu.N, GE CHECKED, ME FaeYISIONS 51-40RT FLAT 5U6MITTAL I -1 -.. UJ ~ Cl I- Q j[ '""' CODE REQUIRED MIN. &' PLANTINc. ElETWEEN EDc.E Conceptual Plant Table 6roadleaf Declduoua Quantlt!:j ~bol 14 ® I 0 14 8 1 8 8 4\.- Elroadleaf Evergreen Quantft!:j S!:jmbol 1 @ 3 ~ 12 8 32& 0 8 (1 Conifer Evergreen Quantity Symbol 2 0 ,-EXISTINc. ce \ AND 12~TORM f) DRAIN~ ,....._ I ..... .._/ \ ' 30. 73 !:: Sorentrrro Name H\jdrangea maoroph\jlla Frunu& spp. Ac::er c::Trc::Tnatum Acer cTrornatum Acer tatarlcum Sorentrrrc Name Camellia Japonrca Archtostaohlos columbTana Cl&tU& 'Dorie 1-ilbbereon c.aultherla ehallon Poluetrc:h.nn munrtum Scientific Name ThJJa plrcata I X ,PROFOSED eFfi! er) Common Name Code Name Planting Size erglear ~drangea l-i!:Jll1a Exr&tlng Fruiting Cherry Frye Existing Vine maple Ac::erc:: Existing Vine maple multT-etemed Acero I" Cal Tatarran Maple Act I 1-112"-Cal Common Name Code Name Planting Size Japane&e oamell1a Casa& Exletrng 1-ia rru Manzanita arc 3-Gal Cletua 'Dorie 1-ilbbereon' CDl-i 3-Gal Salal Sword ferr Common Name Grant arborvlt.de ro t GARAc.E I f!cd L _____ J/ ' I I c.&hal I-Ga I 3' o.c. Polum 2-Gal -&' o.c. Code Name Flantrng Size Thpl Exret1ng CODE REQUIRED 8TREETTREES(2)FOR LOT 2, WITl-i DROUG,1-iT TOLERANT SALAL AND c1sTue GROUND COVER. (&) Acer olrc::lnatum I" Ca I -----,;'("" iii (2) Acer tatarrcum 1-11:fil-ca 1-,/ (12) Cl&tue 'Dorl&/1-ilbber~ -----------I---.--;;.>p~ £)';!' ti:/ LOT 3 / -· FFl;i-6,z., El 0 G. FL. E. 128£> ,.~ / / ~"44. -~1f_:::<~:j>iittib +<·.·-· X C. 3.4 .,----------,;,' WOOD SCREEN FENCE ON PROF LINE .----EXISTINc. ROCK RETAINING WALL TO REMAIN NEW A&Fl-iAL T DRIVE I ' ' #9511079004 LOT3 I I 30.01 \ .. .. . ,. .J,. •.· •QI· / I I I I .,... ~--! / l'- .1,1' I ' / I .& I tj) 'f'I!) w / ). / -q y__ (j :::) 'I" t-'9 -t-= "' Q -q <l) ::r '\:1-:f+--:l -Acer t.itarrcum I -1/2" Cal. ,.,1, OF ROAD ROAD AND r-' PROPERTY LINE. (SMALL STREET TREES AND DROJGl-iT TOLERANT GRA55) -I-----"' shallon -c.al .3' o.c. / r-----/ -. 126 -- ·- ~· 1~.--:: j m 656L r----, I S.F.R. Q' .:'f- F'ROFOSel EXISTING 14" FRUNU5 spp_----' FRUITING Cl-iERRY (RECOMMEND &AYE AND PROTECT J LEGEND SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL TREE& AND PLANTS TO ElE SAYED AND PROTECTED NEW CONCRETE FAYING NEW ASFl-iAL T FAYING 6UILDING. SET6ACK LINE . --·· ~ TW 131 6.W. 132 '--(:l) Arch!: PROPOSED 1-iARD 5Uf.;f'ACE PATIO ,•_. C • 1 S.F.R. lo& co lumb lana .3-c.a I L--PROPOSED CONCRETE STOOP AND STAIR WITl-i I-IANDRAIL TO GRADE '----EXISTINc. WOOD SCREEN FENCE AND CONC. RETAININc. WALL ON EAeT WEST PROPERTY LINE LEGAL DE€>CRIFTIQN, 1 '---EXISTINc. FRONT YARD LAWN AND PLANTING TO REMAIN. PRUNE AND GROOM Ae REQUIRED. '----f'ROF05ED CONCRETE WALK AND STAIR WITl-i CODE REQUIRED l-iANDRAIL5 TO FRONT ENTRY. L,QT S, BLQCK S, C.D, 1-ilL,L,MAN'$ EARLING.TQN GARDEN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE, D1Yl5IQN "I, ACCORDING TO Tl-ii; Tl-iE Fi.AT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF FLATS, F!>,G,E 14, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WA51-ilNGTON. TAX "3,2494"'-14,2S-t2l8 51TE ADDRESS -"1&11 Sl-iAJTUCK AVE. S. OWNER, PAK UNG 1';!312 -41Tl-i. AYE. N.E. 5EATILE, WA 981&& TEL. (2!U:,) -&42 - ..,__,LC•' \H,, •. " ",.' ... ~' •," ' -- ~-+---,,...:...,... EXISTING &' 1-ilGl-i / CONC.6LOCK SCREEN WALL "---EDuE OF AeFl-iALT '------MINIMUM & FT. i'<EQUIRED PLANTING, <EXISTING GROUND COVERS AND GRASS) FLU5 Tl-iREE ADDITIONAL SMALL SCALE STREET TREE& 20 a 20 z () -, s:- liDT W._ __ =i --- 40c._ ___ _,60 1 I --------- -_ --_ --- Seo.le, 1 • -20' " . ______ , ---~-~---- PAK S~ORT PLAT 1S11 Shattuck Ave, &. Renton, WA S8e>SS Edlund Ae.eociatee, inc. landecai:::,e · architecture l&e>e>& SE 111et PO Elox &8"''3'3 Renton, WA ';!00&8 < 42&) 2&&-512~ ( 42&) 2&&-421.i> F ed lunda seoci ates-scorned e.tJ'l~t 6TATE OF WA81-lrNGTON ~Q!STERED \.AND5CAPE ARCHITECT GERALD EDLUND CERTIFICATE NO. 01 PROJECT NUM6ER: '1:>1-'1:>&I DATE, 11/26/2~~1 DRAWN: GE CI-IECKED, ME REVISIONS -----------~~~ St-JORT FL,,6~ "r 6U6MITTAL CONCEPTUAL LAND SCAFE DEVELOPMENT FLAN ~ITYOFREii~NING I 2 'JAN -B 2008 RECEIVED ,.,, ,,,._.,,_, . .,. ,,. ,-. " ,,•, .• ~-"' -, ', ~, _. 1-, ... P>.·J _.. . .-,, "'i ,,_. ,., < ,, .,. '" , ' . ,.,,.