HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA16-000630_REPORT 01Denis Law Mayor
Community & Economic Development C. E. "Ch ip " V in cent, Ad ministrator
October 20, 2016
Cherie Shanks, General Engineer
Office of Public Hou sing
U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development
909 First Ave., Suite 360
Seattle, WA 98104-1000
Dear Ms. Shanks:
Please accept the enclosed Rev ised Request for Release of Funds for the Sunset Terrace
Rede ve lopment proposed by the Renton Housing Authority. Attached to this l etter you
w ill find the following documentation:
• Requ es t for Release of Fund s and Certification {HUD-7015.15) including attached
sig nature sheet from the City's Environmental Review Committee and memo from
Mayor Law designating this body as Responsible Entity under NEPA.
• Part 1 of the RROF (HUD-7015.15) has been replaced, and this version replaces all
prev ious versions.
• A ffidavits of mailing and Posting, and a copy of the published notice documenting
public notification process and procedures
• Conditions of Approv al containing mitigation require ments for this project.
• Copy of the FONSI and EA issued for this project
This documentation should complete the Request for Release of Funds for thi s project.
Please contact me at (425) 430-7314 if you ha ve any question s.
Sincerely,
Vanessa Dolbee
Current Planning Manager
1055 So u t h Grady Way, Re nto n, WA 98057 • ren tonwa .gov
Request for Release of F rir '"'s
and Certification
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development
Office of Community Pla nn ing
and Development
0MB No. 2506-0087
(exp . 07/31/2017)
This form is to be us ed by Respons ible En tities and Rec ipie nts (as defined in 24 CFR 58.2 ) when requesting the release of funds . and
requesting the authority to use such funds , for HUD programs id entified by statutes that provide for the assumption of the environmental
review responsibility by units of general local government and States. Publ ic reporting burden for this collecti on of information is estimated
to average 36 minut es pe r response . including the time for reviewing instructions. searching existing data sources , gathering and
maintai ning the data needed , and com ple ti ng and reviewing the collecti on of informat ion. Th is agency may not conduct or sponso r. and
a person is not required to respond to . a collect ion of information unless that collection displays a valid 0MB control number.
Part 1. Program Description and Request for Release of Funds (to be completed by Responsible Entity)
1 . Program Title (s) 2. HUD/State Identifi cation Number
Capital Fund Program & Operating Subsidy Funds (see 11 be low) WAO 11
3. Recip ient Identification Number
(opt ional)
4. 0MB Catalog Number(s) 5. Name and address of responsible entity
-----------------------City of Renton
6. For information about th is request . contact (name & phone number) 1055 S. Grady Way
Mark Gropper, phone: 425-226-1850, Ext. 223 Renton , WA 98055
8. HU D or State Agency and office unit to rece ive request
HUD Seattle Region X Office
7. Name and address of rec ipient (if different than resp ons ible entity)
Renton Housing Authority
909 1st Avenue, Suite 200 PO Box 2316
Seattle , WA 98104-1000 Renton, WA 98056
The rccipient(s) of assistance under the program(s) listed above requests the release of funds and removal of emfronmental
grant conditions governing the use of the assistance for the following
9. Program Activity (i es )/Project Name(s) 1 0. Location (Street address, city, county. Sta te )
Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating See box 11
Subsidy Proposed Activities for 2016 -2020
11 . Program Activity/Project Descri ption
The Renton Housing Authority manages eight subsidized properties that are available to low income households or low-income
senior or disabled households. These are: A) Hillcrest Terra ce 1442 Hillcrest Lane NE ; B) Evergreen Terrace 3027 NE 15th ; C)
Co le Manor 2811 NE 4th; D) Sunset Terrace : generally bounded by NE 10 Street and Glennwood Avenue NE, SR 900 , and
Edmonds Ave NE; E ) G lennwood Townhomes 1141 & 1147 Glennwood Ave; F) Kirkland Townhomes 1508 Kirkland Ave NE;
G) Golden Pines Apartments 2901 NE 10th; and H) Cedar River Terrace 5 1 Burnett Street. All the properties are located in the
same general area in the City of Renton.
Activities proposed under the Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy for th e period 2016 -2020 incl ude: 1) Public Housing
Authority-wide administration, operations , techn ica l assistance, training , fees and costs, and delivery of services such as
summer youth programs . 2) Low Income Public Housing Authority-wide maintenance including appliance replacement ,
non-dwelling equipment and tools. 3 ) Plans and designs of the Sunset Terrace Rep lacement Units (prior NEPA clearance in
2011 ). 4) Main tenance, Rehabilitation, and Public Facility Improvements at Hillcrest Terrace. Evergreen Terrace, and Cole
Manor.
The request is to the US Department of Housing and Urban Development for the release of Annual Contributions Contract
Number SF-187, Amendment Number 22-N , Grant Nu mber WA01 P01150116, Capital Fund Program . and Operating Subsidy
funds under 24 CFR Part 905 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, Section 9, to undertake a project known as WA011
Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy Proposed Activities for 2016 -2020.
Previous editions are obsolete form HUD-7015 .15 (1/99)
Part 2. Environmental Certification (to be completed by responsible entity)
With reference to the above Program Activity(ies)/Project(s), I, the undersigned officer of the responsible entity, certify that:
1. The responsible entity has full y can-ied out its responsibilities for environmental revi ew, decision-making and action pertaining
to the project(s) named above.
2. The responsible entity has assumed responsibility for and complied with and will continue to comply with, the National
Environmental P o l icy Act of 1969, as amended, and the environmental procedures, permit requirements and statutory obligations
of the laws cited in 24 CFR 58.5: and also agrees to comply w it h the authorities in 24 CFR 58.6 and applicable State and local
laws .
3. The responsible entity has assumed respons ib i lity for and complied with and will continue to comply with Section l 06 of the National
His toric P reservation Act, and its implementing regulations 36 CFR 800, including consu ltation with the State Hi s tori c Preservation
Officer, Indian tribes and Native Ilawai ian organizations, and the public.
4. After considering the type and degree of environmental effects id entified hy the environmental re v iew completed for the proposed
project described in Part l of this request, I have found that the proposal did D did not [Z] requi re the preparation and
dissemination of an environmental impact statement.
5. The respons ible entity has disseminated and/or publi shed in the manner prescribed by 24 CFR 58.43 and 58.55 a notice to the public
in accordance with 24 CFR 58.70 and as evidenced by the att ached copy (copies) or evidence of posting and mailing procedure.
6. The dates for all statutory and regulatory time p eriods for review, comment or other action are in compliance with procedures and
requirements of 24 CFR Part 58.
7. In accordance with 24 CFR 58 .7l(b), the res pons ible entity will advise the recipient (if different from the responsible entity) of
any special environmental condition s that must be adhered to in carrying out the project.
As the duly designated certifying official of the responsible entity, I also certify that:
8. I am authorized to and do consent to assume the status of Federal official under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
and each provision of law designated in the 24 CFR 58.5 list of NEPA-related authorities in sofar as the provisions of these laws
apply to the IIU D responsibilities for environmental re view, decision-making and act io n that have been assumed by the respon sib le
entity.
9. I am authorized to and do accept, on behalf of the recipient personally, the jurisdiction oft he Federal cou ,ts for the enforcement
of all these responsibilities, in my capacity as certifying officer of the responsible entity.
Signature of Certifying Officer of t he Responsible Ent ity
Date signed
City of Renton, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055
Part 3. To be completed when the Recipient is not the Responsible Entity
The recipient requests the release of funds for the programs and activities identified in Part I and agrees to abide by the special
conditions, procedures and requirements of the environmental review and to advise the responsible entity of any proposed change in
the scope of the project or any change in environment al conditions in acco rdance with 24 CFR 58.71(b).
Signature of Authorized Officer of the Recipie nt Title of Authorized Officer
-<S:cutive Dire\.,tor
Date signed
/CJ. 18. 2£7/C
Warning: HUD will prosecute false claims and statements. Conviction may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. (18 U.S.C. 1001, 1010, 1012 ; 31 U .S.C.
3729 , 3802)
Previous editions are obsolete form HUD-7015 .15 (1/99)
Request for Release of
and Certification
1ds U.S. Department of Housin
and Urban Development
Office of Commu nity Planning
and Development
0MB No. 2506-0087
(exp . 07131/2017)
This form is to be used by Respons ible En tit ies and Rec ipients (as defined in 24 CFR 58.2) when request ing the release of funds, and
requestin g the authority to use such funds . for HUD programs ide nt ified by statutes that prov ide for the assumpt ion of th e envi ronm ental
revi ew respons ibi lity by units of ge neral local government and States. Public report ing burden for this col lection of information is estimated
to average 36 minutes per response. includ ing the time for rev iewin g instructions. searching existing data sources . gat he ring and
maintaining the data needed . and completing and reviewing the co llection of informatio n. This agency may not conduct o r sponso r. and
a perso n is not required to respond to . a co llection of information un less that co llection displays a val id 0MB contro l number.
Part 1. Program Description and Request for Release of Funds (to be completed by Responsible Entity)
1. Program T1tle(s) 1 2. HUD/State Identifi cation Num be r
Capital Fund Program & Operating Subsidy Funds (see 11 below) W AO 11
3. Recipient Identification Number
(o ptional)
4. 0MB Catalog Number(s ) 5. Name and address of responsible entity
---------------------------, City of Renton
6 . For in formation abou t this requ est contact (name & phone number) 1055 S. Grady Way
Mark Gropper, phone: 425-226-1850, Ext. 223 Rento n, WA 98055
8. HUD or State Agency and offic e un it to rece ive request
HUD Seattle Region X Office
7. Name and address of recipient (if different than responsible ent ity)
Renton Housing Authority
909 1st Avenue, Suite 200 PO Box 2316
Seattle, WA 98104-1000 Renton, WA 98056
The recipient(s) of assistance under the program(s) listed above requests the release of funds and removal of environmental
grant conditions governing the use of the assistance for the following
9. Prog ram Activ ity(ies )I Projecl Name (s) 10. Locatio n (Street address . city. county . State)
Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating See box 11
Subsidy Proposed Activities for 2016 -2020
11. Program Act1v1ty /Pr0Ject Description
The Renton H o u sing Authority manages eight subsidized properties that are available to low income households or low-income
senior or disabled households. These are: A) Hillcrest Terrace 1442 Hillcrest Lane NE; B) Evergreen Terrace 3027 NE 15th; C)
Cole Manor 2811 NE 4th; D) Sunset Terrace: generally bounded by NE 10 Street and Glennwood Avenue NE, SR 900, and
Edmonds Ave NE ; E) Glennwood Townhomes 1141 & 1147 Glennwood Ave ; F) Kirkland Townhomes 1508 Kirkland Ave NE;
G) Golden Pines Apartments 2901 NE 10th; and H) Cedar River Terrace 51 Burnett Street. All t he properties are located in the
same general area in the City of Renton.
Activities proposed under the Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy for the period 2016 -2020 include: 1) Public Housing
Authority-wide administration. operations, technical assistance, t ra ining, fee s and costs, and deli very of services such as
summer youth programs. 2) Low Income Publ ic Housing Authority-wide maintenance including appliance replacement,
non-dwelling equipment and tools. 3) Plans and designs of the Sunset Terrace Rep lacement Units (prior NEPA clearance in
2011 ). 4) Maintenance, Rehabilitation, and Pub lic Facility Improvements at Hillcrest Terrace. Evergreen Terrace , and Cole
Manor.
The request is to the US Department of Housing and Urban Development for the release of Annual Contributions Contract
Number SF-187, Amendment Number 22-N, Grant Number WA01 P01150116 , Capital Fund Program , and Operating Subsidy
funds under 24 CFR Part 905 of t he United States Hous ing Act of 1937, Section 9, to undertake a project known as WAO 11
Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy Proposed Activities for 2016 -2020.
Previous edit ions are obsolele forrn HUD-7015.15 (1/99)
Part 2. Environmental Certification (to b e rnmpkted by responsib le enti ty)
With reference to the above Program Activity(ies)/Project(s), I, the undersigned officer of the responsible entity, certify that:
l. The responsi bl e ent ity has fu lly carried out its res ponsi bilities fo r envi ronmental review, decision-mak ing and action pertain ing
to the p roj ect(s) named above.
2 . The responsible en ti ty has assumed responsibility for and compl ied with and will continue to comply w ith. the National
En viro nmen tal Po licy Act of 1969. as amended, and the environmental pro cedu re s, permit requirements an d statu tory oblig ati ons
of the laws cited in 24 Ci:JZ 58.5; and also ag rees to comp ly w ith th e authoritie s in 24 CFR 58.6 an d a ppli cab le State and local
laws.
3 . The n;sponsib le entity has assumed res pons ib ility fo r and compl ied w ith and wi ll co ntinu e to co mpl y w ith Section l 06 of the l\ati o nal
Hi sto ri c P reservat ion /\ct, a nd it s impl ementing regu lations j6 C'FR 800, inc lud ing consultation wi th the State Hi s toric Prese rvat ion
Orticer, In d ian tribes and Native Hawa iian organ izat ions. and the pu bl ic.
4 . Aller considering the ty p e and deg ree o r environmental effects id entified by the env iro nmen ta l review comp let ed for the proposed
project d esc rib ed in Part 1 of th is request, I have found that the proposal d id D did not [ZJ require the preparation and
dissemination of an envi ronmental impact sta tement.
5 . The responsible ent it y ha s d isseminated an d/or pub lished in the manner prescribed by 24 CFR 58.4j and 58.55 a notice to the pub li c
in accordance with 24 C FR 58.70 and as evidenced by the attached copy (copies) or evidence ol'posting and mailing procedu re.
6. T he dates fo r a l I st atut ory and regu latory time periods fo r re view. comment or oth er action arc in compl iance with procedures and
requ irements of24 CFR P art 58 .
7. In accordance with 24 CFR 58.7 l(b), the respons ible enti ty w ill advise the re cip ient (if di fferent from the re sponsible ent it y) of
a ny special environmenta l conditions that must be adhered to in carryi ng ou t the project.
As th e duly designated ce rt ify in g of'llc ia l of the respo n sib le ent ity, I a lso certify tha t:
8. I am aut horized to and do consent to assume the statu s of Federal official un der the Nationa l Environmental P o licy Act of 1969
an d eac h provision of law designated in th e 24 CTR 58 .5 list of NEPA-related authorities insofar as the pro visions of th e se la ws
app ly to t he H UD res ponsib ilities for env ironmental rev iew, dec ision-making and act ion that have been assumed by the responsib le
ent ity .
9 . I am aut horized to and do accept, on behal r of the rec ipient person all y. th e .iurisdiction of th e F edera l courts fo r the enfo rcement
of a ll these resp onsibi lit ies, in my capaci ty as ce11ify ing officer of the responsib le entity.
Sig nature of Certifying Officer of the Responsible E ntity Title of Certifying Officer
Date signed
X
Address of Certifyi ng Officer
City of Renton, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055
Part 3 . To be completed when the Recipient i s not the Responsible Entity
The rec ip ient requests th e release of funds for the programs an d activi ties idenli lied in Part l and ag rees to a b ide by the s p ec ial
cond iti o ns, procedures and requirements of the environmental review and to ad vise t he responsible entity of any proposed change in
the scope o flhe project or any change in environm ental condi ti o n s in accordance w ith 24 CFR 58 .71(h).
Sig nature of Authorized Officer of the Recipient T itle of Authorized Officer
Ex~cutive Director
Date signed
JO. 18. )o/G
Warning : H UD will prosecute false claims and sta tements. Convict io n may result in criminal and /o r civi l penalties. (18 U.S.C. 1001. 1010, 1012 : 31 U.S.C.
3729 , 3802 )
Previous editi ons are obsolete form HUD-7015.15 (1/99)
DATE:
TO:
FROM :
SUBJECT:
EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT ------,.Renton®
M E M O R A N D U M
October 11, 2016
City of Renton Community and Economic Development
Department
Renton Housing Authority
US Housing and Urban Deve l opment Region 10
Denis Law, Mayor f;} r
Clarification of Responsible Entity and Certifying Officer
This memo supplements the July 27, 2010 memo identifying the Environmental Rev i ew
Committee (ERC) as the entity to perform functions under the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA). (S ee attached.)
I designate ERC as the Responsible Entity body for purposes of comp li ance with NEPA. I
designate the Chair of ERC as the Certifying Officer, who is authorized to certify
compliance with NEPA on behalf of ERC and the City of Renton.
It should be noted the Renton Municipal Code reference in the 2010 memo is correctly
cited as 4-9-070D rather than 4-9-070G.
EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
July 27, 2010
Sunset Area Planned Action and EIS File
Denis Law, Mayor~ -f_.
Responsible Entity Under NEPA
In Renton Municipal Code section 4-9-070G, the City of Renton designates the
Environmental Review Committee (ERC), as appointed by the Mayor of Renton, as the
responsible official under the State En v ironm enta l Pol icy Act (SEPA}. It is th e
respons ibility of the ERC to supervise scoping and preparations of any required
environmental impact statement, or related documents. Various federal statutes, and
regulations of the Departm e nt of Housing and Urban Development (24 CFR 58.1 and 24
CFR 58.4), authorize the City to serve as the Responsible Entity for purposes of
compliance with th e National Environmental Policy Act (42 USC 4321). The functions of
th e Responsible Entity under NEPA are sim i lar to those of the responsible official under
SEPA. Therefore, I designate the ERC as the entity with authority to perform the
functions and provide the certifications required of the Respon si ble Entity und er NEPA.
h:\exec\forms\merno forms \exec st a ndard:ne r.io .doc
CITY OF RENTON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
On the 30th day of September, 2016, I deposited in th e mails of the United States, a sealed envelope
containing ERC Notice and Determination documents. This information was sent to:
Name Representing
Age ncies See Attached
Mark Gropper, RHA Applicant/Owner
Cherie Shanks, HUD Agency
Christine Littleton, EPA Agency
Cecile Hanson, Duwamish Tribe Agency
,I
Signature of Sender): ~MJIX
s TATE OF WASHINGTON \J
ss
COUNTY OF KING
I certify under penalty of perjury under t he laws of the State of Washington that th e foregoing is true and correct,
I know or ha ve satisfactory evidence that Sabrina Mirante
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the u ses and purposes
mentioned in the instrument. ,,,,,\\\\\\\llft
,,''.,}.Q\..l y .P ,,,,
._::--~ ;.,.~''""'"•, OL. ,,, -:-~ 11,,, ~~ 'l,
My appointment expires:
Project Name: Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy RROF-2016 -2020
Project Number: LUA16-0 00630, EC F
template -affidavit of servic e by mailing
I
Dept. of Ecology • •
Environmental Review Secti on
PO Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
WSDOT Northwest Regi on *
Attn: Ram i n Pazooki
King A r ea Dev. Serv ., MS -240
PO Box 330310
Seattle, WA 98133-9710
US Army Corp . o f Eng i neers •
Seattle District Office
At tn: SEPA Reviewer
PO Box C-3755
Seattle, WA 98 124
Boyd Powers • • •
Depart. of Natura l Resources
PO Box 47015
Olympia, WA 98504-7015
KC Dev. & Env i ronmental Serv .
Attn : SEPA Sect ion
35030 SE Douglas St. 1121 0
Snoqua l mie, WA 98065
Metro Tra ns it
Senior Environmenta l Planner
Gary Kr iedt
201 South Jac kson Street KSC -TR -0431
Seat t le, WA 98104-3856
Seattle Pub l ic Uti li ties
Jalaine Madura,
Attn: SEPA Responsib le Official
700 Fi hh Avenue, Suite 4900
PO Box 34018
Seatt le, WA 98124-4018
AGENCY (DOE) LEITER MAILING
(ERC DETERMINATIONS)
Dept. of Ecology••
Attn: Misty Blair
PO Box 47703
O lympia, WA 98504-7703
Duwamish Tribal Office •
4717 W Margina l Way SW
Seattle, WA 98106-151 4
I
! KC Wastewater Treatment Division •
Environmental Planning Supervisor
Ms. Shirley Marroquin
201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050
Seattle, WA 98104-3855
WDFW -Larry Fisher *
1775 1 2th Ave . NW Suite 201
Issaquah, WA 98027
City of Newcas tle
Attn: Tim McHarg
Director of Commun ity Development
12835 Newcas t le Way, Ste 200
Newcastle, WA 98056
Puget Sound Energy
Wendy We iker, Commun it y Svcs. Mgr.
355 110'0 Ave NE
Mai/stop EST 11W
Be ll evue, WA 98004
Puget Sound Energy
I
Doug Corbin, Municipal Liaison Mgr.
6905 South 228'0 St
Kent, WA 98032
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. ·•
Att n: Karen Walter or SEPA Rev iewer
39015 -172nd Avenue SE
i Auburn, WA 98092 I
I Muckleshoot Cu ltural Resources Program••
Attn: Laura Murp hy
39015 172nd Avenue SE
Auburn, WA 98092 -9763
Muckleshoot Cu ltura l Resources Program h
Attn : Eri n Slaten
39015 172 ,c Avenue SE
Auburn, WA 98092-9763
Office of Archaeo logy & Historic Preservat ion•
Attn : Gretchen Kaeh ler
PO Box 48343
Olympi a, WA 98504-8343
City of Kent
Attn: Charle ne Anderson, AICP , ECD
220 Fourth Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032-5895
City of Tukwila
Jack Pa ce, Responsible Official
I 6200 Southcenter Blvd.
I Tukwi la, WA 98 188
I
' I
I
*Note: If the No tice of Application states that it i s an "Opt ion a l DNS ", the marked agencies and cities
wil l need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checkli st, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of
App lication.
**Department of Eco logy is emai led a copy of the Envi ron mental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to
the followi ng email address: se pa unJ(cl ec v .•.vJ .gov
•• Karen Wa lter, Laura Murphy and Erin Slaten w ith the Muckleshoot Indi an Tri be Fisheries Dept. are
emailed a copy of the Env ironment a l Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to t he fo ll owing email
addresses: ~Wa l~~_-@m tic~IPs h0ot nsr .us / La u ra 'ru r phv~rr~_l__l<:klP5_QQ0 ~.1J.S r .us L
er 1 ·1 . ?.la tr.1 (ii) muck lesho ot. ri sr>. us
***Department of Natu r al Resources is emai led a copy of the Environmenta l Check list, Site Plan PMT,
& Notice t he fo ll owing email add r ess : sepacen t er@dw.wa .gov
template -affidavit of service by mail ing
Renton Housing Authority
2900 NE 10th St
Renton. WA 98056
Chr istine Littleton
US Environmental Protection Agency
1200 6th Ave, MS-OERA -202-3
Seattle, WA 98101
Cec i le Hanson
Duwamis h Trib e
4705 W Marginal Way SW
Seatt le, WA 98106
Mark Gropper
Renton Ho using Authority
PO Box 2316
Renton, WA 98056
Cherie Shanks
US Dept. of Housing and Urban
Develo pment
909 First Ave , Ste. 360
Seattl e. WA 98104
Department of Community and
Economic Development
~~ -------r I :; ( : () r I :: '
REVISED NOTICE OF FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO
REQUEST RELEASE OF FUNDS
FOR SUNSET TERRACE REDEVELOPMENT
DATE OF NO TICE : September 26, 2016
NAME OF RESPONS IBLE ENTITY: City of Renton
LAND USE NUMBER: LUA16-000630, ECF
ADDRESS: Environmental Review Committee
Car e of: Department of Community & Economi c Development, Current Planning, 1055 South Grady WA,
Renton, WA 98055
STAFF CONTACT: Vanessa Dolbee, 425-430-7200
PROJECT NAME: Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating Subs id y RROF-2016 -2020
These notices shall satisfy two separate but related procedural requirements for activities to be
undertaken by the Renton Housing Authority.
REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS
On or about October 18, 2016 the City of Renton will authorize the Renton Hou sing Authority to submit a
request to the US Department of Housing and Urban Development for the release of Annual Contributions
Contract Number SF-187, Amendment Number 22 -N, Grant Number WA01P01150116, Capital Fund
Program, and Operating Subsidy funds under 24 CFR Part 905 of the United Sta tes Housing Act of 1937,
Section 9, to undertake a project known as WAOll Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating
Subsidy Proposed Activities for 2016 -2020 for the purpose of maintenance, rehabilitation, and operation
of public housing, at about $330,000 annually for capital funds and up to $642,000 annually for operating
subsid ies , between 2016-2020.
The Renton Housing Authority manages eight subsidized properties that are available to low income
households or low-income senior or disabled households. These are: A) Hill crest Terrace 1442 Hill crest
Lane NE; B) Evergreen Terrace 3027 NE 15th; C) Cole Manor 2811 NE 4th; D) Sunset Terrace: general ly
bounded by NE 10 Street and Glennwood Avenue NE, SR 900, and Edmonds Ave NE; E) Glennwood
Townhomes 1141 & 1147 Glennwood Ave; F) Kirkland Townhomes 1508 Kirkland Ave NE; G) Golden Pines
Apartments 2901 NE 10th; and H) Cedar River Terrace 51 Burnett Street. All the properties are located in
the same genera l area in the City of Renton.
Activities proposed under the Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy for the period 2016 -2020 include: 1)
Public Housing Authority-wide administration, operat ions, technical assistance, training, fees and costs,
and delivery of serv i ces such as summer youth programs. 2) Low Income Public Housing Authority-wide
maintenance including appliance replacement, non-dwelling equipment and tools. 3) Plans and designs
of the Sunset Terrace Replacement Units (prior NEPA clearance in 2011). 4) Maintenance, Rehabilitation,
and Public Facility Improvements at Hillcrest Terrac e, Evergreen Terrace, and Cole Manor.
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
The City of Renton has determined that the project will have no significant impa ct on the human
environment. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) is not required. Additional project information is contained in the Environmental
Review Record (ERR) on file at the City of Renton, Department of Community & Economic Development,
Development Services, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 9805, where ERR ca n be examined and may
be examined or copied weekdays 8 A.M to 5 P.M.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any individu al, group, or agency may submit written com ments on t he ERR to the City of Renton
Environmental Re view Committee. All comments r ece ived by: O ctober 17 , 2016 will be considered by th e
City of Renton prior to authorizing submission of a request for release of funds. Comments should specify
which Notice they are addressing .
ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION
The City of Re nton cert ifies to HUD that the Environmental Review Committee consents to accept the
jurisdiction of the Federal Courts if an action is brought to enforce responsibilities in relation to the
environmental review process and that these responsibiliti es have been satisfied. HU D's approval of the
certification satisfies its responsibilities under NEPA and related laws and authorities and allows the City
of Renton to use Program funds.
OBJECTIONS TO RELEASE OF FUNDS
HUD will accept objections to its release offund and the City of Renton's certification for a period of fifteen
days following th e anticipated submission date or its actual receipt of the request (whichever is later) only
if they are on one of the following bases: (a) the certification was not executed by the Certifying Officer
of the City of Renton; (b) the City of Renton ha s omitted a step or failed to make a decision or finding
required by HUD regulations at 24 CFR part 58; (c) the grant recipient or other participants in the
development process have committed funds, incurred costs or undertaken activities not authorized by 24
CFR Part 58 before approval of a release of funds by HUD ; or (d) another Federal agency acting pursuant
to 40 CFR Part 1504 has submitted a written finding that the project is unsatisfact ory from the standpoint
of e nvironmental quality. Objections must be prepared and submitted in accordance with the required
procedures (24 CFR Part 58, Sec. 58.76) and shall be addressed to HUD at Seattle Regional Office, Seattle
Federal Office Building, Office of Public Hou sing , 909 First Avenue, Suite 360, Seattle, WA 98104 -1000.
Potential objectors should contact HUD to verify the actual last day of the objection period.
Responsible Entity Certifying Officer
City of Renton Environmental Review Committee (ERC)
Date of Decision: September 26 , 2016
Date of Publication: September 30, 2016
-----------Ite"lllOll 0
NOTICE OF FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT AND NOTICE
OF INTENT TO REQUEST RELEASE OF FUNDS FOR SUNSET
TERRACE REDEVELOPMENT
DATE OF NOTICE :
NAM E OF RE SPO NSI BLE ENTITY :
LAND USE NUMBER :
ADDRES S:
STAFF CONTACT:
PROJ ECT NAM E:
REVISED
September 26, 20 16
Ci ty of Renton
LUA16-000630, ECF
Env ironment al Rev iew Committee
Care of: Department of Community & Economic Development, Current Planni ng
1055 South GrJ dy WJy
Renton, WA 98055
Vanessa Dolbee, 425 -430-7200
RP.nton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operat ing Subsidy RROF-2016 -
2020
Th e se noti ce s shall s atisfy t wo separate but relate d procedural require m ents f or ac tivities to b e undertaken by t he
Re nton Housing Authority.
REQUEST FOR RELE ASE OF FUNDS
On or about October 18, 2016 the City of Re nton w ill autho r ize the Renton Ho using Autho rity to submit a req uest to the
US Department of Housing and Urban Deve lopment for the r ele ase of Annua l Cont ri butions Contract Num be r SF-187,
Amendment Number 22-N, Grant Numbe r WA01P01150116, Capi t al Fund Prog r am, and Operating Subsidy funds und er
24 Cf-R Part 9C5 of the United States Housing Act of J 93 7, Section 9, t o underL:ike a project known as WAOll Renton
Housine Author ity Cap ital Fu nd and Operating Subsidy Proposed Act ivities for 2016 -2020 for the pu r pose of
ma intenance, r ehabilitation, and operation of public housing, at about $330,000 annually tor capital funds and up to
$642,000 ann ua ll y tor ope rating subs id ies, between 2016-2020.
The Renton Housing Authority manages e ight subsidized pr operties that are avai lable to low income househo lds or low-
income sen ior or disable d househo ld s. These are: A) Hillcrest Terrac e 1442 Hi llcrest Lane NE; B) Everg re en Te r rci ce 3027
N~ 15th; C) Cole Manor 28 11 NE 4t h; D) Sunset Te r ra ce : generally bounded by N [ 10 Street and Glennwood Avenue NE,
SR 900, .:i nd Edmonds Ave NE; E) Glen n wood ro wnhomes 1141 & 1147 Glennwood Ave; F) Kirkland Townhomes 1 508
Kirkla nd Ave NE; G) Go lden P111es Apartments 290 1 N E 10th; and H) Cedar River Terrace 51 Burnett Street. All the
properties are located in the same general area in the City of Renton.
Activit ies proposed under the Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy f or the period 2016 -2020 include: 1) Publ ic Housing
,\uthority-wide administrat ion, operatio ns, technical assistance, tra in ing, fees and costs, and de l ivery of services such ;;s
summer youth programs. 2) Low Income Publ ic Housing Authority-wide maintenance includ ing appliance r ep l acement,
non-dwel l ing equ ipment and tool s. 3) Plans and d esigns of the Sunset Terrace Replaceme nt U nits (prior NEPA clearance
in 2011) 4) rv1aintencince, Rehab i litation, and Pub lic Fac ility Improvements at Hil lcrest I err ace , Eve rg ree n Terr ace, and
Cole Ma nor.
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPA CT
The Ci ty of Renton hJs determined that the projec t wi ll have no significant impact on the human environment.
Ther efore. an Environmental Impact Sta tement under the National Environmenta l Po l icy Act of J 969 (NEPA) is not
re<iu irPd. Add tional project informat ion is conta ined in the Environmenta l Review Record (ERR) on file Jt the Citv of
Renton, Departme nt of Community & Economic Development, Development Services, 10SS Sou th Grady Way, Renton,
WA 9805, where ER R cci n be exam i nPd and may be examined or copied weekdays 8 A.M to 5 P.M.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any individual, group, or agency may submit written comments on the ERR to the City of Renton Environmental Review
Committee. All comments received by: Octooer 17, 2016 wil l be considered by the City of Renton prior to authoriz ing
submission of a request for release of fund s. Comments should spec ify which Not ice they are address i ng.
ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION
The City of Renton ce rtifies to HUD that the Environmenta l Review Committee consents lo accept t he jurisdiction of the
Fed eral Courts 1f an action is brought to enforce responsibilit ies in re lation to the envi ro nmental review process and that
these responsibilities have been sJtisfied. HUD's approval of the ce rtifica tion safofies its responsibilities under NEPA
and related laws and authorities and allows the City of Renton to use ProgrJm funds.
OBJECTIONS TO RELEASE OF FUNDS
HUD wil l accept objections to its r elease of fund and the City of Renton's certification for a period of titteen d ays
following the anticipated subm ission date or its actuJI receipt of the reques t (whicheve r is later) only it they are on one
of the following bases: (a) the certif ication was not executed by the Certifying Officer of the City of Renton; (b) t he City
ot Renton has omitted a step or failed to make a decision or f inding requ ired by HUD regu lations at 24 CFR pJrt 58; (c)
the grant r ec ipie nt o r other participants in the development process have committed f unds, incurred costs or
undertaken activities not author ized by 24 CFR Part 58 before approval of a release of funds by HUD; or (d) another
Federa l agency acting pursuant t o 40 CFR Part 1504 hJs submitted a wr itten finding that the proJect is unsat isfactory
from the sta ndpoint of environmental quality . Objections m u st be prepared .:ind submitted in acco rdance with the
required procedures (24 CFR Part 58, Sec. 58.76) Jnd shall be addressed to HUD at Seattle Region.:il Office, Seattle
f-edera l Office £3uilding, Office of Publ ic Housing, 909 First Avenue, Suite 360, Sea ttle, WA 98104-1000. Po t ential
objectors should contact HUD to verify the ac tual last d ay of the object ion period.
Re sponsible Entity Certifying Officer
City at Renton Environmental Review Committee (ERC)
Date of Decision: September 26, 2016
Date of Publicat ion : September 30, 2016
Name, Signature &>fl1;t'AUNl!7f ~~5 /fMt!tJl>~WP...
1,z f}/3/
N ame, Signature
"
__ E,:.~c __ C_'_f....~, .c_f_f-_· ___ _
Name, Signol ure
Ct._,',, C..:_o,h'Yl..J,'I•~ ~ ~<s::.no1ri,c
[ 4 J September 30, 2016 www.rentonreporter.com
City accepting tourism 1,.vmotion grant application;,. Senior resource expo Oct. 8
I 'llir Renton Senior Activity Center is ho,ti11g a 50+
'!he cit:' of R:1;ton is ~ow accept collect added sales lax from thei1 entities arc du~. by 5 P·r:1·· ?cl·. 7. I Srnior Resource Expo Oct. 8 al the center.. .
ing application, tor 201 , tourism .:ustomcrs, a portion of h'hkh goes Applicat1ons "111 be re\ 1ewcd and , The expo, the lust of its kind ,n Renton, 1s aJmcd to
promotion grants. ·1hcsc grants sup to the citv. ']he Renton C1tv Counnl finalist, will be invited to present educate the c ity's 50 and over population about the vari-
pnrt tourism marketing and opna h as appointed a Lodging T;u Adviso before the LTAC in late Octobt·r. ou, n·sourccs that arc available for them. '!here will be 40
t ions in Renton and art' available to rv Committee (LTAC) and tasked 11 The committee will make its fi nal vendor cxh1bih and special presentations that cover tOf.lllS
c onvention and visitors' bureaus, ;ith distributing these fu nds. Co:n recommendations for funding tn including health, finance, legal issues, h o usi ng and more.
destination marketing organi,,ations, m1ttec mcmberi include rcprescnta the Re nton City Council in Novem-Lunch will be provided from 11 a.m. to I p.m. Free
non -profits such as chambers of tivcs of the city, Renton Chamber of her. tra.nsportaliun will he available for Renton residents
commerce and lodgmg ;i ssoc1at 1o ns Commerce and local hutch. Coun-~or more information, contact through H yde Shutlle.
and municipalit ies. cilmcmber Armondo Pavone chairs Cliff Long, economic development This free event is 10 a.m. 2 p.m .. Oct. 8 al Renton
Hotel s, motels, private camp the committee. director a t 425 -,130 -6591. Senior Activity C,·nter, 7.11 ~urnett Ave. N.
~round, and similar bu,inessc, Applications from qualifying
Sup('rior Court of Wa~h i n~ton
Count~· uf Kiu:,:
L::i n.'. the l.:stat.::: of
DAISY ,ui: CIIARLl:S .
Uccca~i:d
Ml 16 4 0452~-\ K:-.: i
.,u nn. TO CRF.llITORS
T:i.c Pl:rsonal Rq.ln''!>1:11tJlt\ i.:
named below ha.s b1..-..:r. appoir.~cd
a., Personal R1.·p1i.:~\'.ntJti\.c o{
rr.i > !:,.stare. ,\ny r,crsnn h<t ving a
claim agaim,'. fa1.· t.l1.T~tk1:: mus:.
before the tine th~ claim wou'.,I
L'l: b:.im.::J b: any ol hci"-·;~c appli-
cahlc st.i tutc ur \urnt at1t.m),
prl'3Cnl 1hc clnim 1n 1he manna
as prm H.kJ m RC\V l l 40 070
b: serving on M m:111ir.g rn th(!
PL':-wnal RL'prcwntat 1vc or th e
Pc:-sonal Reprcscmati\e·s attor-
111.·ys ;.,it the addrns, stated helow
a copy of the claim am! Ii! mg the
o :1ginal of the cbim with the
Court m wh:1:h tht.· prubatc pro-
ncdlngs v. er<" commenced
The dai.:n must be :m:scnlcd
'" ithin ,:,_~ later nf ( i) Tf.irt)'
d.i; s alh:r tl1~' PcN(mal Rcpr<~sen-
tati"c s.cr ,icrl or rr,ailcd th ..: :"Ju
tic..: tu tbt.: creditor a:i. provided
under II.CW 1140.020{1 )fe). or
(2} four mun th:. after !hi.' d ah.'. of
fir~, pobli..:ation of the ~oti..:c. 11
thL' d .11111 111 11ul pn.:s1.:1:~c(l withir.
this time frame, th..: d,um 1~ for-
c"cr burred. C;\C\,,1)t ;i .. ,; t)therwi ..;L'
prnl'idcJ ir: RCW 11 40.0, I and
11 40.060. rh:,; br is cllcc11\L"
d.S tu d,rnL:i. aga1n51 bt11h the
decedent ·s prnbak a:.~1.·1:-. and
nonp :-oba:c ~~ch
Date of lir~t pubh1.:alto11
St'Ph.·mhcr 10 . 201 t,
PR: SWA '>\1-1· R llR U',FR
Peter \V \-1ogrcn
WSIJA ,q15 ·,
DfMOGRIS G I.ESS\l·R &
AllRL'.\S. P.S Ancm<'v"' for
Pcr~onal Rc-prc)';cn:i!:i\~
100 l·.\l~rgrccn l31ri g , PO Ko., 90
Rcn:nn . \\A 9805 ' 0090
t·t~5) 2~)~4)42
Kmg County S..ipl.:'rmr Cuurt
( ·av•e '\n l ri-i-04)29 I K~T
Pubh,h<'rl m th(' Kcnlnn Kcponcr
un S,.;pt,:111 b1.:1 ·rn, 701 fi. Octohcr
7.i4. ~016. 1i:-ooq6.
\At.LE\' \JEOlC.\I.
CDTF.R
Di slrict lkal lhcarc Svslcm
;";0 1 ICE OF ROARIJ
co,n,irru \IEt:r1M;
'\uticc ,, hcrchy gwcn th Jl mm
m1\\L:i,; m~t.·\mg'>'. ol th.-:: Valley
\,fr-dical Ccmcr f3 oar<l or Tru~-
tL·...::-will Ix-held .:IS liJllow'\
Compcns:ition Cumm,ttt.·L' "Wdl
1111.;et o n \fonday. Octnhcr :o al
11 :30 a.m. 111 l\111f~·-1c11et.· Room
H at Valle; l\.kJ.1cJ.; l'l'n\L'r, Rm
tun \VA
t!OAl!tJ Of-TRl S 1'1-.1·.S
(l)i'>tricl lkalthcarc Sr,tcml
Hy . s~mdra Sw.irrl
l;.xccufr.e As~1slant
to the ~o;=ird o f I m'1C\')';
l'ublishcJ m LhL' Ki.:nt. R.::nt ,)n,
C't.l\ ington, \.1Jpk Valky1Bl;.i6:.
Lh:111:0111.l Ki.:portcr"> Si.:pt-::nb,;r
30 ; Ck~o~r ... 2016 . #17028~2
e n y OF R~:NTO,
MHKI: OF ORl}l'>AJV·t:;
AIJOPTEIJ IIY nn:
IH:NTO:-.: <Tl Y ('Oll:-;CJ L
t ol\riwrng i s a )';'Jmmary of thl.!
Unh:i.J.:J.,:~~ aJl,ph::d bJ the Ren-
Ion City Conned on Si.:p ti.:mh.:r
c6. 2016.
ORll",net: '10. S8t5
A!l Ordm;un;c of the Cny of
Renton , Wa~hm~lun. a1 m;m.!1:1g
:)UbcctHm I O 11-1 .b of the.: Ren
ton ~1uni..:ipJl Co<lt.·, U1l:rc:.1:i.1:1g
th.: sp,...'\'d li mit ,rn southcJst ~fay
\'alkv Ru.id a11d \:ilc t\\t.:nuc
'\Jonhcast from twL'nty-Ji\"1: (251
mil,,:.s !Kl ho ur ro th;r.y {10)
miles p<.'r hour. anJ l.'.:it;.ibfol1:11~
ml cfkt.:t ivc date.
fffc~fr,.L:: 10130,:~0\(:
Compk rc tC'<t l,f rhi~ ord:na:11.:..:
can tx: ilium: on thL.· Cit\\ ~cb·
site at www.rcmom1,,·a.go'v l;:,u11
:-l'4u..:~; to the Cit: Clerk ·~ o:fcc ,
(-1.25) 4 .10-6510. cop;.:s "WIil also
b.: ma,kd for a fee
Ja~o~ A Si:tt'., Cit)' C L,:rk
P .1bbhcd :n Rc:11on Rcp,oncr on
Scpt<mber JO. 2016. f'l70JII t.
~upermr l ~oun 1)f :he Staie of
\\'.1sh111gtun Ill ;md for th c-
CoL"\I)' of Kin g
L'.S. HA:-.:K TRL.ST. 1' A, AS
111.l s·, El: l·OR l S~4 \\AS ! ER
PAH I It 'IP.-\ rlO'I 111. t:ST,
Pl;.imt1i1,
-..s
\.17',;K .\,OW'I 111,IRS ,\'Ill
DLVISt.l:S OF LOIU:l'A ,\
11.\IJO"<: Hf)(;l·.H II 11 ,\tlO'I .
ROtll:RICK .. , II AIJO~·: RO(;_
1:11. 11,\HO,, Al I.AN C IIAll
0:\. ESJl:B,\'I II. IIAHO\,,
ll,\\K Or ,\Ml·.R I(',\. NA:
CIIASI. 110\11. l·l\,\~U.
Sl ,\I t, Of WASII INGTO,:
and all olf:cr pt:rn.lll '> or part 1.:::,
unkn 0wn cln.iminr . .any kg;,11 m
q u1t;.ibk rig ht, lllk, ('')!:Hr. k·n,
or rn tcn:st in tht.· real prnpc1ty de~
s<.:ribcd in lh..: \,:vmpbmt her..:: 11.
aJwcr'>..: tn Pl .i.1ni1 ff\ t lll1:, or a:i.v
L'lo.1J 011 l'la1111trrs litlc tr.: th~
rrup1.;ny, l:ol:c..:ltvdy dt::i.tg rmtd
a:.-. 001-S i 1hrnur,h "lO. m(·,uq\·..:
Dd"...:r,<lanb.
Ca,eNmob or 12 -2 40)98 8K~I
SU \l\10:\S
TO: t ':-;K'\O\\S 111:IRS A:-.:ll
llEVISU:S OF I.URETA A.
IIAHO N: ROGER II. 11.\llO,:
ROtH:Rl('K .\. IIAl!O'i:
ROGER IIAIJO:-.:: ALL-\' C.
H ARO'\; ESTEll.\:'i II. 11 ,\8--
01',;
A Jjw~ull hJs bern :i.t.1.111.:C.
c1gJ.11bt ynu 1n ;he JhO\.C·Cnllll~d
courl b ; plamt111 . Pl.:11nti:r~
chum~ .1r..: .stated m l he wntt1.:n
( ·u111pl ,rn1t. ~ c11p: t if wh1ch is
scrvd upvn you w11h 1ii1"1 Som
muns . In order to dcfC11d .!.ga.m~t
lhs law~m t, yuu musl r<.."'lopomi to
lhc Complamt hy slalmg your tk-
tcn,c m writ ing, J.r'ld ,crvc a cop y
upon ,hl· unJ1,;r-.1g.n.:d ,111omcy
PUBLIC NOTICES
for the Plaintiff w1lh111 tvvt.:11l)
('2 0) da)'"S a!lcr thG ~er-vice or this
Summnr.s. c,cludmg lh i.: <la) uf
s1.:1·v1L'C . if -scnrc,J in the S:;1:c o f
\\,';,L'>hington, or w ithm s:~1;' (l.tO)
days aflcr the 5crvicc of th1s
Summon s. cxdul.!mg tht..: <lay of
si.:rvirc. i ~ served out-.idc the
StatL' of Wa:i.h111g tm1. er if y.Ju
arc a United State~ gav~mrn~nt
tkt'cnJant, ur a U1.·fault Judgment
n1a: be entered aga inst )'OU 'wlth
m.t 110\ICl".
/\ default juJgrncnt 1~ one
"'hl"rc plaintiff i, en11tlc d to whal
it a.sb for bt:L'au~t.: you ha\e no1
rc ,pomh::d. I f yo u scr,.·e a not,c.:.(!
of a;ipe;i.r;,1111.:c 0:1 the und as1r,ncd
altnmey. )OU arc enti tled lu 110-
tlL'1.' bdur'C' a ddaul1 .11ulgment
may h1.· e11ll:rc<l.
You m~\ J1.·m;uu1 lhar th;,.·
Pl;11rrtiff ti lC thi~ !J.'1,1.SUtt wlth 1:11.·
cuur.. If )'ULI du so. th e dcm:rnd
mus.: he in writmg and must bl.'
SL"I\.1.'.J upon tlic pcr~n :;igning
~hi.; Summon~. \Vithm 14 day~
allcl' ~ot. si:"rveJ the d ~ma nd , the
Plamt:ff rr.u,t fik Om ]a\\·Suit
\\ lib tlic court . or the s~rv1cc on
vnu of lh1~ Su11mw11, a:1d Cm~1-
i,l.1ir.: will he "'oiC
If you wi:-;h to Y..:ek t1 1,; a1.h ice
of an attomcy i :'I this matter, you
~hould du su prumptly 3LJ lb.,n
yuur wr:ttc11 r,:sp,;im,,:. 1f ,my.
Ill.I ) O\.· 3Cf\0,::J \Jll time:
Tl!IS SUMMO'IS i, i,,wcJ
pur~uant to Ru le 4 of th <' Supi:ri
or Court Civil Ru k~ o f the Stutc
of Washington
Natha11 r. Smith, WSBAf:43160
/\ttom cy for Plaintiff
;\fakom Ci~ncru,,
A l.i!w Cvrpur.!lion,
211 7. Hu~inc'-~ (enter Dnvl'.
S-.·c1.md Fluor
ll\inc, CA 9~6 1:.'.
Puhltsh,:d m ti,..· R,:nlm: K.-::porl·
rr or Scpterr.ha 2 l. :rn. 20 16;
Octohe~ 7. I ·I. 2:016 :iJ tW!{)(i I
SL:;x·r1.1r ('oun t)f \\Jshmgtun
( ·,-,un:; 1)f King
hi re lh,~ b,tatc of
\1.\Ht:L .\N., l'IH>Rt'.
Dccea,;;cd
NO 16 ·4-U...,/()i }.J K'\ r
-.01,n: TO CR•:u, J'OHS
I lie PL:r.s onal H(pn.:~1.·nta\nl.'
nJm,;J lx:lu"· !"::..t:) been appomtcd
-'13 P -.,:r3on,1I ~1.:pn.:1i1.;nlal 1vc vi
thi, F.-.:a:l·. :\m JXhO'l hav ing ,l
cLlllri JgJ tnst tf..: d-.·ct.:lk11 1 mu)l,
bdorc thi.: lime 1hi.: d a im ):I.Ould
b.: har.t:d )y a11:r vtlu.:rw l'.'I·..: ,c1 ppl i-
c;=ib1..:: 1>latu:l: of l imitat;un~.
:,r-.·s~nt !ht.: datm !Tl lk:; m,mm;r
~s pnwitict..: in RC\\ 11..10.070
by s~:r\i11g on or mailinr; tu t h:.:
Pcr~o nal R .. -prL's-.·ntativc lit the
Pcrso n,1 1 Rcpn.:scnuti'vc\ Jl\or
ncys al th i..: at.IJ,c~:. stdict.l belo w
a 1,;op; of the claim and Ii lmg
1h..:; o ri£in,i l of the claim with
1h, Cuurt in which l~<; probate
pn.11,::ccd ings wcr\'." commcni..:cd
I hc daa m mu,1 be prc-;cn1cd
within the la tcr ol: ( 1) I h,rl.)
day, after lh,: P~r~onal Rcpn.:sL'II-
t;.il1\t.: si..:rvcd ur mai icd :he :'\o
t·cc to the L'rL·C11u; J.s p1 u-..1dcd
unJcr RC W 11.40 0~01 t l(o). or
(2) four m,rnths alkr thL' d~tL' of
t.r:i.l publicaiion of the Notici: If
fo..: d a1m is nut p tt.:3L'lllC'l! wi1hm
1'.1i:i. time frame. the claim i~ for
ever bd:rL'd. L.:'1,3.:..:pt a~ otherwise
provided in RCW 11 40 051 and
1 l .40.060. l Ins bar 1s cffITtiH.·
as io <.: l&mh againsl both the
C.cccJcut's prul:alL' a:i.si.:ts and
r.on prc:hat e as,eb
Oatc of fust pl1b lic at10 n
Sepcmbe, 30. 2016.
PR: CIIARLFS l'lltl.lPTIIORP
Peter W. MoL'Tl'n \VSUA 1:l J 515
Of Mt K,RF'\. c;1.1'.SS:-.:ER &
AllllE\"S. PS Anorne't'"' for
Pc:r,;;cn.1 \ Reprcs.entativc
IOU l.:vcrgrccn Hldg . PO Hox 90
Renton, \VA 98:057 01)90
(4 2S) 25'-4'.>42
Kin g ("ou11ty SupL'nu1· l'ottrt
Causc _,o 16-4 -0\701)-1 KN'\
Publi shed m th l'. Rcr:~on Rcportc-r
on Scptcmher 10, 20: 6, Ot:toh1.:r
7, 2016 ant.: <.ktobcr 14. 2016
•170 1151
e n y OF RENTO'li
Rl'.VISEIJ ,·cnJCE OF
Fl.''WI:'> G OF NO
Sit.NI FICA:'iT nlPACT A:'il)
NOT l('F.!H
I NTISI' TO REQL l ST
H.Et.F:ASF. Ol FC .'li l)S FOR
St.:i\Sll TERR,\CF.
REOE\'l:LOP~IISI'
DAI I: OF 1'0Tl(T
S..:ptcmb1.·r 26, 20 : 6
1'AME o r Rt ·S PO'iSl!l U :
F :"JTITY: C il) ul Kcn1un
LA 'IIJ L SI·. t([j\tflFR:
!.UA 16-0006.\0. FC F
ATJl)Rl~SS: 1:,m ironm..:nlal
Rcv1L·w Com1111ttcc
<\ire of· Dcpar.mt:nt or Cummu-
n:t)' & l:conom1c u..::~clopmcnt,
Curren: Plann :ng, 1055 South
(;rady 'A:\, Renton. \\'1\ IJ:<O'\"i
S !,\IT CON l,\CT:
Vancs,a I )nltx':c. 4 /:S--l 10 n oo
PROJEC I' !',;A\·11 ···
Rrnton l lnu,mg /\ulhnril) Cap1·
tJ! Fund and. Op .. :r;.itmg Suhs1d·,
K~Ot· :>Ot/,. ,Ml)
These noth:e:; yhall suris.fy rwa
.<;,t.·purall· hur related pr1Jatlurul
,equirottent5 .for activitic.~ to he
undertak.,:n by Iht' Renton
1/uu.,in,: Authority.
REQn:sT FOil RI.I.US•:
o~ Fu,ns
On m ahuut Ouubcr 18, JO I(, 1hc
Ci1y ,,f R(;nttin \\111 aulhurl/..: l h,:
lkntun Houjing Authnrity to
.;ubmit a rc4u1,;<:,,\ :o thc LS Ui.:-
put mcni nf I l1iu .... int ant.: l. rban
Dt.:\·.:lupmL'Ht tu , Lhi.: release.: nf
:\nnu.-11 Contnbut10n~ Cunlr.i.ct
Numbtr SI·-J SI. /\mcr.dment
Numbcr 22 N. G ranl 1\urnbcr
\\.:\O tro.:50116. Ci.1.pit al FunJ
P·ogr<1m . nnd Opcr<111r-g Submi~
t".md.s umkr 24 CH\ P~1r1 90) or
the Umted ')1.1t cs I lti1binr, Act oC
191 7, Se:cllon 9, :o u11Jcrt;,ik1.: a
prn1cc1 Jmowr. a,;; WAO: : R~n tvn
llml.,mg ,\uthorilJ I ·ar1t:1I I und
a11 d Opcratmg Sub:-1J:, Propvst.·d
Act1v1tie,; for 20 16 2020 for the
pUTjlOS(! of ma111k11;,incl~. rchab th ·
tation. and operatinn of public
hou~mg.. at about $3J0,000 annu-
ally t"'-u capital funds a:u.l up tu
SM2,000 annua lly for opcr:.11ini~
s ub,id:e". hetwecn ~016 2020
'll1l' RL·nton I-lousing Auth(lnt)'
mnn:igc'-eight suh:;id i1.1."d prupl.:'1
ti(;~ that art.· avaibbk to h)w in-
come hi)uschnlds er Low mt.:Ollll'
~rn1ur ur t:li:•:1b:~d touseho!ds
rhcsL' an:: A) l hllcrc~t l"crracc
1442 Hi!lcrest Lmc t\1-.; Bl Ev
t.'rgrL'c n T1.·rrai.:i.: JOD NL l ~th ~
Ci Co le vlanor 2RII NE 41h . 0 )
Sum,L'l Tt.:rrJcr. generally OOun<l -
cd hy \J 1=. 11) Strc1.•: an(! Gknn-
wuvd A"cou.:: .'\I~. SR 900, ::ir.d
LrlmonC.s An: 1'1. L) G kr:.n -
\Wud ·1uw11l:uml!, 11 41 & 1147
Glcnnwood AH. I-") Kid1.fand
lownhomcs I ."0' Kirkb.nd A\·C
NL (j) GolJ..:11 P 1111.·~ Ap:.trtmi.:nt:.
2~01 :-.:F l!lto: and !I) Cedar
R1 vi.:1 Ti.:mn:,,; 5 1 Hum1.:n Sm·1.·t
/\11 thi.: propcrt1c,; arc loc<!tcJ m
lb.; :S.Jmc gcn.:::nil are:.i in thL' City
of Rcntor.
Acll virics p:opu..,cJ unl:..;r the
CJpital Fumi and Op1.:rat111g SL1b-
,1dv for the pcnoJ 2016 20 20
include: I) PubiiL· llousir.g i\u-
lh unty-w idc administration. o p
crations, tt.\:hrm;al .1:b1::lance,
training. fee" and cost~. and
dd1vcr) of scrvJCes. such a;
5.Umrncr youth prn~rram~. 2) Low
lncum c Puh lic Hnus inl!. Author
ity wiJ-.· mai11h:na.i1\.~C -induJing
applianct.~ replJ...:cment, nun
dwdl111 g ~t.1 u1pmcn l and tool ,; l )
Pl..in.s <lilt.! lk,:gn~ o f the St.nsL'I
11..Tac.:r RL:p1Jcemi;n1 1;nit..; (pri1:r
~F.PA dc:iranel' 111 20! 1 ). 4 )
Maintc1·ancc, Rchnhi lit1tion , ;1:id
Puhlie Fac1hty l mprnv,,;mL:nb al
ll 1l t...·1c~l lcrT"a cc . h,cr~.rc::n lcr
race. and Cole Manvr.
H:-;IJl'liGOF
NO SIGNIFICAN I' IMP,\CT
I he ('11y ,it" Renton has ,.kier
m1n(.·d that l h\.· prn1c ct "ill h.aH'
nn sign ll icant im pac t on tht.· hu
man en-..,ronn-t:nt. nic,l'lu,..:. a11
l·.n ... ,rnnmenta l lmpac: St.n.:~rnl
1.1nd...:1 lh1.· '\at1ora' l·n .... 1ronmcn
tal Po licy /\cl of \Q69 (\Jl·P,\J 1::-
·1;.it rrqutrrd A,:,lit10n:'ll [)fOJC'l.'.I
i11form .i.t1un h nm1a,1ed in lh c
l·.n..,1ronmcnul Re\ icw lh·..:o rd
{ERR) c.:n lik al the C il) of R~"':i-
tim , lkpanment o f CammumlJ
l'-: h.:onon:ic Uc"dopmcnt, De-
velopment Scr,..1...:..:~. I ()5.' S,JU lh
(iradv W av, R.-:ntnn. W.\ 9:-i0 5,
whl.'r~· l Rli. .;an br nammcd :.ind
ma: h: examin ed or cup1cc.J
v.1.·,:kda.,s ~ A .'vl 10) P ~1
PIIHLI C' C0\1\IE.'liTS
A n~ 1minlfh1,11, erour,. r.r agc:1cy
m :iv ::.uhrrnt wrllt.:::n comment> on
1hc°' ERR 10 1he C itv 1,f Renton
Lnqronmcnt,il l{c,,iCw Cr.mmi t-
l..:...:. ,\ll t·ouuncnts 1·cce1ve<l hv·
Oc1ohcr 17, ~01(, will b,-.; l:u n::.1d
L'n.:<l hy lhL' Cll y of K.cnion r,rir.r
10 ::iuL\.imiting ~u brni.ssiun of a
rcque~t for release of funds.
Cor~1111..:11b should ~p .. .::cif) wh id1
~oticc tht.')' .!IC addn:s~m g.
E.'liVJH0,,_\1ENT,\I. CEII.-
IIHCAT IO :", Th e C11y ol
Rl.'nton t:1.-rt1li1.·~ to HUD that the
Environmental Rcv1cw Curmrnt
tc..:: cnnsc.nt, to accept the juris-
diction of the rcctcral Court:--11
an a..:t1on is hrougl:~ to enforce
re)':,pon,.:..ihi!itics 1:1 rdathm tu lhl'
C.Il\ irn1w1c.n1al H'\'t1.·w pnx:es(,
and that 1hc~c rcspomibilitr,;~
ha\;: bL't.·11 ~11~fii.:d. H -...L>'s ap-
pro\ al of thi.· <:i.:rtili...:at:un )i.il1s
fies irs rcs7onsfoili1ics under
l\'l.'..PA an<l rdi.tlt.:d la"w :,. and
auth ontics and aliow,; the Ctt; ol
R,nton tu u~~-Pr ogram fond~
ORJECTIONS TO RELE.-\SL
OF H li\lJS JILU will aoccpt
oh·ec11o n.~ to 1ts release of fur.<l
and the Citv of Rcnion ·s cenifi
cation for d 'pt:nvd of iifl..:L'11 d.ay:,
fo !IO\\ ing th e anticipilted c-.uhml'i
sion date.· or ,t~ a;;tual n.'cl·tpl oi
the rcq11c'a (whichever is. later)
onlv 11" the\' a.re on one o r tlie
fotfowing h~;.;c ~: fo) t hl' 1:.·ertilica
llun w ii:o not c.\.ccut.::d bv ~he
Certifying Ofliccr of the c·ity uf
RL'.nttm. (bt the Cnv of Rcnion
h:1~ om1"\!d J st\!p · o r fa11L'd to
tnak'-' ~ dcns.i11r. or finding n:-
quirc<l h y IILD rcgul:nions :n 24
CF!{ part SX. I d t he ~wnt rcctpi-
ent or otht:r pJJticipant.s III tbc
development prn..:ess h:i..c mm
miticJ Emds. inL'um:d ro~b c1
undcn,1kcn acti\i1tie'\ nol ;1uthu:-
l.l.t.:d b \, 24 CFH. l'~H1 )8 bcfo:-..:
apprn\';; of .i rl.'ka~c of lumb bv
!I UD, or (dJ anoth\:r Fedcral
agency .i...:tmg pur)i..a1:: tu 40
CFR P,U1 I '504 ha ,; ~uhmincJ a
\\T'.IIL'll 1;m!1:t!; th~tl lh~ proict : is
un~ntisfactorv from the stand
ptJllll of c1;v1ron111 cntal (:Ud !ily
Objcc:ions must b~ p ,cparcd and
.subm1lh.'.J u, act.:o rC.arcc w ith 1hc
rcquir,:d procedures (2·1 CFR
P;u l S8, Sec )~ i &t and shnl' be
:iCdrc.;,;;c,d to Tll ]D al Se~!tk
l{c(!1ona l Office. Scau!r l·C"ck :-:11
office Ouildmg,. 01:·1n· of Public
I lou..,,ng. 909 First A\'cnuc. Suitr
160. s..:<1ttk . \.\i,\ •nno.1 .1000
Putrnt1a l o bwcior~ ..,hnul,1 con -
ta1:.·t H UD w vi..:nl)' the ;.ictual last
day of the ()hjl."ction period
Rcspo ns ibh: l-.:.ntit) Ct'rtif)'ing
omcrr
C •ty of l{i.;111,m hninmn1..:nu:
Rc-..1\.·w Cum1:ult(.·c (U\C)
D,11:..: u f I >i.:c is iv n
Scptl.'.mb..:r 26, 2016
1):-iti.; lll
0 P11h iicatum ·
Sq>t~·m b..:1 JO. 2016
P11hlis.hcd m Ri.:nton R.:purt..:r 011
Scpt.-::mbn JO, /.!Jl(, 1/t7tlH26
To place your
Legal Notice in the
R cnotn Reporter
plcasi.: ca.II Linda at
251 214 1506
or e-mail legals @
rcponcrncwspapcrs.com
STATE OF \VASHINGTON, COUNTY 01<' KING
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
PUBLIC NOTICE
Linda M M i ll s, h e ing first duly sworn on oath that s he i s the Leg al
Advertising R epresentative of the
Renton Reporter
a weekly ne v.•s paper, which ne,.vspaper is a legal newspaper of
oeneral c irc ulation and is now and has been for more than six months
rior to the date of public ation here inafter referred to , publis hed in
the E n g lish language continuous ly a s a weekly newspape r in King
County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has h e en approved as
a L egal New s pape r by order of the Superior Court of the State of
Washington for Kin g County.
The notic e in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues
of the R e nton R eporter (and not in s upplement form ) which was
regularl y di strihutcd lo its subscribers during the below stated period.
The annexed noti ce, a:
Public Notice
was published o n September 30, 2016.
he full amount of the fee c harged for s aid foregoing publication is
the sum of $361.75 .
\\\1111111, ,,, i,,11 N ,,,
/:J#/ ·' · ,'·'. (, H 11 /f/t,'U-, " ,. . .. ,.... .....,
,' "v--'-.,, •• ·.:)~• 1
_ XP1n;_.. ',
inda Mills 2 0 /.·' ',1
'\ ;
Legal Advertising Representative , Renton Reportii /--.. :\1r"'?-'l \ -z. =
Subscribe d a d sworn to m e thi s 30th day o f Scp~~rnb·~r. :2'm1J~,\f 1 j 2 =
\S~~
' ' -::. ·. '? ,,:,2 .::
\ \ \ • ~ ••. ')~1'.·· ~ :::
~ \ c-...,, ~ <.5\, ••••• •; \ ~;;··, '<"' , .....
\ ., /_,., ........ ---, ' .:...J-... ,, ·1 I[ . .,.... ,,
G' I G . N P bl. f h S f W I . 11h . 0.'r , ·. ,,, a c w111, otary u 1c or t e tate u as 1111 g ton , 1~e~W,rng ·111
Covi n gton , Washington
CITY OF RE\TON
RE \'ISED \OTICE OF
l•l'DI \(; OF \0
SI(;\ ll•ICANT 11\1P:\CT AND
\OTICEOF
li\TE:'liT TO KEQl lEST
HELL \SE OF IT:'liDS FOR
Sl ;\SETTU{l{ACE
IU: IH: \TI .( JP:\ 1 ENT
DAT!' OF NOTI( 'F ·
Scptclllbcr 26.2016
'.'JA1v11 ·: OF RFSl'ONSlflL E
FN T ITY ('11y o l l~c nt on
I.AND l JSI: Nl JM lll -:1{
LlJ i\ 16-000630. LC F
ADDRL:SS l :11v1 ro11 111cntal
Rev1C\\ ( ·o mmntee
Care or Department o f Comm u-
nity &: Ew11 om1 c Developmen t.
C urre nt l'lannmg . I 0 ~5 South
(irnd v Wi\. Rernon. \1/i\ 98055
SIA!·!· COi\T1\C.T
Vane ssa Dolhec. 42.5 -4 ltl-721lll
PROJECT '.'JAMI:
Rcnl()n I lo us ing i\uthorit> Capi -
tal Fund an d Operat ing Su bs id>
IWOF-211 In · 2020
The~·e 11utices .v/111/J .rnti.vfy two
uporate hut related procedural
r<'quiremmts f or artil'itie.s to he
11111/ertak,•11 hy rite Re11to11
liu11.vi11g A utlwri(r.
REQllEST FOR RELEASE
OF H IN DS
( )n ll r ah,iut ( lcto hcr I 8. 20 I(, the
( ·11> of' Re nt()n ll'ill authon,e th e
Rcnl<>n I lousing /\uthonty to
submit a req ue st to the LS D e-
part me nt ,1 1 I lou ,111 !3 and Urban
lkvclo rmcnt fri r the re lease or
J\nnual Co ntri butions Contrad
J\umber SF-I 87 . 1\menJmcnt
J\umbcr 22-N. Grant Number
Wi\011'0 11 50116. Capi tal Fun d
l'rog ram. ;mJ Opera11ng Subs idy
runds unde r 24 Cl· R Part 905 o r
the United State, I lo usi ng Act of
I 93 7. Scc t1(1n 9. tn unJenakc a
pro.1 cc1 knm, n as Wi\O I I Ren ton
I lousing Authori ty C 'ap1tal Fund
;md O perati ng Suhsid y l'roroscd
Activ it ies !o r 2ll I 6 2020 for the
pur p,)SC of ma1nte11:mcc. rc hah1 !1-
ta tion, and o pera ti<>n ,,r puhlK
housi ng . at about $330 ,000 ann u-
al!, to r capital f'u nJ, and up tu
$642.00() ann uall y for ,1pcrat1n g
,ub>1d 1es. bet ween 20 I(,. 2020
!'he Ren ton I lousing Authori ty
man,1gcs e ig ht subsiJi,.cd prnper-
t1 e, llwt me ava1!a blc to J,,w 111-
c,,me housc h,1lds ,,r low-111cnme
se ni or or d1sa hled househol d s
Thc,e arc A J 11 i I !crest Te rrace
1442 ll1ll crest l.ane NL: Il l Lv-
cr\'.rern Terra ce 31127 NL 15 th:
CI Cole M:11J<>r 28 11 J\ F 4th, [) I
Sunset Tcrr.1ce . i:cncrall,· hound-
ed b1 NI: !() sireet an~! Ci lcnn-
wooJ Avenue NI:. SR ')00 . and
EdnwnJs i\ve NI .. Fi (ilcnn-
wo,)d Townh omcs I 141 & 1147
Cilc 11n11otKI ,\vc. l'l K1rh land
Tl mnho mcs 1508 K1rk lam.l A\c
NE. G) Golden 1'111cs Apartme nts
290 1 NI' 10th. ,md II ) Cedar
Rive r Terrace 51 13urne ll Street
All the prnpe rt 1e.s arc located 111
the same gc nc,al arc;.1 111 th \.· Cll:,.
o i'Rcnton
,\ct1v11 1c, propi.>scd und er the
C ·:1p1t,li I· und and O pcrall n\'. Su h-
sid1· lt'r the period 20 16 -20211
1m:lude I I l'ubJ ,c llou,cn g Au·
t ll(l ntv-w1de adm111istrat1011. op-
eratio ns, tcdmica l a.ss1.,ta nc e.
tra in ing. !'ccs and cost;,. and
deliver, ,if service , such as
su mmer '.'-\)Uth programs. ~) I ,O \\
Inc ome P11 hhc I lous1 11g i\uth,ir-
11, -wide 111amtcn ane c 111d 11d 1111.:
aiiplianec replacement. 1101;.
d11-ell ing equ1pmrnt and tools 31
Pla ns :md dc s ,gns of the Sunse t
Terrace Rerlaccment I .1111.S (pn ,ir
~EPi\ dcmam:c 111 2\l ll). 41
\·1acnlenance. Rch:1 b ilitati o11. and
Public l'ac1l1t\ Im provement s at
II i!krcst Terrace. Lvcr\'.rccn I er-
racc . and Co le Manor
Fli\DING OF
'i() s1c;N1 Fl CANT l~ll'ACT
T he Cit y of Renton has dc tcr -
1111 nc d ti'1at the pro1ccl w1 II h ave
no s1g111fican t impact ,,n th e h u-
man enviro nment Therc ltllT. rm
Fn v,wnme ntal lmpan Statement
unde r the Nat 1llna l I :nv 1mnmen-
t:1! l'ol 1cy ,\ct ll f ] ')6lJ ( I': Li 'i\) IS
not required Addi t1011al pm1 ect
in formation 1s con ta in ed in the
1;11v1r,,11 rn c nta l Re view RccNd
( 1-.!<l<i ()11 file at the C1t v ,,r Ren-
to n. Departm en t o f c :)m m umt)
8: Lcon,m1i c Devcl op mcllt. lk-
ve lopme nt Serv1ecs. 105 5 S<,uth
(irad, Wa\·. Re nt @ . W,\ 9Xt 15.
whe re FRR GIil he e:-.am 1ned and
may be c:-.ammcd or copied
11cek da\'s X A M l<l 5 I' \1
l'l.'RLIC C0\1~1E\TS
i\nv 111J1 v1J ual. grou r. m agcncv
may ,ubm 1l wri tten ern 11mc nts on
the !:RR to the City ,,f Renton
l·:nv1ro11 111c nlal Rc v cc w Com nlll·
tee i\11 rn111mrnts received h\
Ocwber 17. 20 16 1111! be con ,iil-
crcd b,v the e n, ,,r Rent('n pri or
10 aur hon11 ng suhn11ss 1r1n o r a
request lilr release o f funds
l'ommcnt, should specif, "luch
Nottcc they arc ad d ress mg
E'.\\'IRO\'.\IE'.\TAL U-:1{-
TIFICATIO:\ The City or
Ren l<lll certifies tn l llJD that the
l:nv 1rl'nmcntal Rcvic" Co111m 1l-
tce con sents lo accept the J lfflS·
J 1et1 ,111 pr the , .. edcral Court, If
an ac t1 ,,n is b rough t to en force
rcsp()11si b d1lics in relation to the
cnv1nlnmcnlal rcv iC\\ procc~.~
a nd lh,1t these rc spons ib1!tt1e;.
have hccn .s atisfied I IU!l's a p·
proval o r the cert lf ica uon sat ts·
fi es Its rcspon s1 b iht1es under
Nl-:1'1\ and rclaled Jaws anJ
a 111h,1r1t1cs and all ows the C1lv o r
l<cn ton to use l'mi:r,1111 ru nd s. ·
OBJECTION S ~IO RELEASE
OF Fl''.\l)S !ILi) will accept
oh.1cct1 011s to its release o r fu nd
a nd the C 1t1 <>r Renton 's ce rt ifi -
cat1011 fo r :l
0
pcnod or nneen days
t,11!owing th e rn11 icipated suhm 1s-
>1 on date nr its actual rece ipt ,,r
the request (\\luc he\'cr 1s late r)
1H1 1' 11· thcv arc on one o r the
lo li',,111ng b~scs la J the certific a-
t 1011 11 as not c.,ecutcd bv the
Ccrt11y 111g Otlicer o r the c'11v nf
Rc nt<>n . I b) the City or Renton
has \llllltlcd a step ()I failed tn
make a dc e1s1on or fi 11d 111g. re-
q ui re d hy 111 11) re gula 11 011s :n 2J
C l·I< pa rt 58; lC) the gran t rCC IJ)I·
cnt or <lther rart1eipants in the
Jcvcl,,pment process hav e c,,m-
m1llcd fu nd s. meurrcd costs ,,r
und crtahe n ac 11v1t1es not aut!)()r-
11.cd h, 2-1 ( TR !'art 58 hc rore
appn11,:11 o f a 1c lcasc o f fun ds b)
I lllll: or i dl an other Federal
agenc y act mg pursuant tll 40
( 'FR !'art 15114 ha.s suhm1llcd a
written findi ng t hat the prowct 1s
un,atisfactory rro111 the stand-
po 111l or C;!V ll'l'll lllCnta! 4 ua! it)
O bJCCt <(>n s must l'ic pre pared and
suhm111cd 111 :ic cordance with the
required procedu res ( 24 ('f, R
!'art 58 . Sec 58 76 ) :md sh,11! be
add rc'5cd 1,1 11 LI l at Seattle
Re~1ona l ( )!lice. Scall lc l·cdcral
llll'1ce lluilJ1ng. Ollice o f l'uhl1 c
I lous111g. 909 First 1\vrnuc . Suite
.l(,0. Seattle. W/1 98 1 fJ.1-1 00(\
Pote1111 al ,1h.1eet ors shou ld w n-
ta ct 11 \J I) to vcnl\· the act ual last
day o r the oh1 cctH,;1 rx;n oJ
Hl·s po11sihle Ent ii)' Crrt if) ini:
()fli('fl'
l '11, o f Rcnlon l·.nvimnmental
Review C <lmmittce ( LRC')
Date n f Dc c1s1on
Septe mber 2(,. 21 11 (,
Date o r l'uhhcat1on .
Septe mber .10. 20 16
l'ubl1shcd 111 Rrnto n Report er on
September 31l. 20 l () I• 1703526
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUN, IT
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ----------ifen tOil@
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE REPORT
ERC MEETING DA TE:
Project Name:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Owner:
Project Summary:
STAFF
RECOMMENDATION:
October 19, 2016
Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy RROF-2016 -2020
LUA 16-000630, ECF
Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager
Renton Housing Authority; 2900 NE 101
h St; renton, WA 98056
The applicant, th e Renton Housing Authority (RHA), i s requesting National
Env ironmental Policy Act (NEPA) review for their proposed Capital Fund and Operating
Subsidy activities for 2016 through 2020. All activities receiving Capital Fund Grants
and Operating Subsidies from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
(HUD) are required to undergo review pursuant to the NEPA, consistent with HUD's
rules (24 CFR Part 58). The City of Renton is the NEPA Responsible Entity (RE) for RHA
proposals. NEPA review for RHA's proposed activities is being accomplished by a single
programmatic EA review for the period 2016 to 2020 and is applicable to all affected
properties in the Renton Housing Authority's portfolio. The Renton Housing Authority
manages eight subsidized properties that are available to low income households or
low-income sen ior or disabled households. Exempt and non-exempt activ iti es are
propo sed. Activities incl ude: Public Housing Authority-wide administration, operations,
technical assistance, training, fees and costs, and delivery of services such as summer
youth programs; Low Income Public Hou si ng Authority-wide maintenance including
appliance replacement, non-dwelling equipment and tools; Plans and designs of the
Sunset Terrace Replacement Units (prior NEPA clearance in 2011); and maintenance,
Rehab i l itation, and Public Fac ility Improvements at Hillcrest Terrac e, Evergreen Terrace,
and Cole Manor.
Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue Request
to Release Funds {RROF).
The final step in the NEPA process is for the ERC to issue the Request to Release Funds (RRO F). Th is is a certification
that the City has completed t he NEPA process and will be sent to the United States Department of Hous i ng a nd
Urban Development (HUD) with a number of att achments documenting tha t public notice has been given. Notice
of t he City's intent to Request the Release of Funds was i ss ued on September 26, 2016, with publ ication and
distribution by September 30, 2016.
Once the RROF is issued and se nt to HUD, the Renton Housing Authority may begin their application proc ess with
HU D to redeve lo p Sunset Terrace.
Revised ERC Report -RROF 10.19.16.docx
Conditions For Approval of Renton Housing Authority Capital
Fund and Operating Subsidy Proposed Activities for 2016 -2020
The following mitigating conditions of approval for the Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and
Operating Subsidy Pro posed Activities for 2016-2020 were identified in the Environmental Assessment.
Law, Authority, or Factor
Clean Air
Contamination & Toxic Substances
Historic Preservation
Mitigation Measure
Comply with Puge t Sound Clean Air Agency rules on Asbestos
Control Standards. Responsible Party: Contractors.
The City shall require all construction contractors to implement
air quality control plans for construction activities in the project
area. The air quality control plans shou ld include best
manageme nt practices to control fugitive dust and odors
emitted by diesel construction equipment.
The following BMP s wi ll be used to contro l fugitive dust.
• Use water sprays or other non-toxic du st contro l method s
on u npaved roadways .
• Minimize vehicle speed wh ile traveling on unpaved
surfaces .
• Prevent trackout of mud onto public streets.
• Cove r so il piles when practical.
Minimize work during periods of high winds when practical.
The following mitigation measures will be used to minimize air
quality and odor issues caused by tailpipe emissions.
• Maintain the engin es of construction equipment accord in g
to manufacturers' specifications.
• Minimize id ling of equipm ent while th e equipment is not in
use .
Responsible Party: City of Renton and Con tractors.
No impacts are anticipated, but if ev idence of potential
contamination is identified during project planning or execution ,
procedures shou ld be implemented for samplin g and analysis to
evaluate the suspect material and provide for appropriate
handling and disposal of the material to ensure protection of
human health and the environment. Respon sible Party,
Contractors.
No impacts to archaeo logica l resources are anticipated . In the
event that ground disturbing or other activities do result in the
inad vertent discovery of archaeologica I deposits, work shou Id be
halted in the immediate area and co ntact made w ith DAHP in
Olympia. Work should be halted until such time as further
investigation and appropriate consultation is concluded. In the
1
Law, Authority, or Factor Mitigation Measure
unlikel y event of the in advertent d iscovery of human remains,
work should be immediately halted in the area, the discovery
covered and secured against furth er distu rba nee, and contact
effected with law enforcement personnel. Responsib le Party,
Contractors.
Endangered Species, Surface Water, A. Use pervious materials to replace sidewalks to offset any
and Aquifer Protection Zones added impervious areas for public facility or site improvements
(e.g. solid waste enclosures or ADA improvements), to achieve
no -net-increase in site impervious areas. Alternatively,
implement best management practices that achiev e low impact
development objectives and the surface water design manual
standards.
B. Reroute public facility improvements (e.g. replacement
sidewa lks) to retain trees. Alternatively replant trees if tree
removal is necessary consistent with City standards {RMC 4-4-
130).
C. Comply with City surface water design manual as appropriate.
Responsible Party: Renton Housing Authority.
Coastal Zone Management Act Apply as appropriate for a permit or certification for State water
quality requirements if exceeding state thresholds. Comply w ith
City surface water design manual as appropriate under any
circumstance. Responsible Party: Renton Housing Authority.
Noise Abatement and Control At Cole Manor seek the highest sound transmission class rated
siding that meets capital facility needs and resources.
Responsible Party: Renton Housing Authority. (See
Environmental Assessment Attachment B for links to guidance
documents.)
2
Signature Sheet for Certifying Officer of Responsible
Entity for Request for Release of Funds and Certification
Project: WAOll Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund
and Operating Subsidy Proposed Activities for 2016 -
2020 Environmental Assessment
Responsible Entity Certifying Officer
City of Renton Environmental Review Committee (ERC)
Signature ~ ~ '-
Signature ~ ?(J?/fl{_c .. -=·-,
Signature: /( '
r I I
Signature:,_L-=· '---=-......--Z:~·-_,.j""---__ =----=-~::,;-"-d-;'---_
1
U.S. Department o 1sing and Urban
Development
451 Seventh Street, SW
Washington, DC 20410
www.hud.gov
espanol.hud.gov
Environmental Assessment
Determinations and Compliance Findings for HUD-assisted Projects
24 CFR Part 58
Project Information
Project Name: WAOll Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy Proposed
Activities for 2016 -2020
Responsible Entity: City of Renton
Grant Recipient (if different than Responsible Entity): Renton Housing Authority
State/Local Identifier: WAOll
Preparer: Lisa Grueter, Manager, BERK Consulting
Certifying Officer Name and Title: Mayor Denis Law and designee the Environmental Review
Committee
Grant Recipient (if different than Responsible Entity): Renton Housing Authority
Consultant (if applicable): BERK Consulting, with Cultural Resource Consultants LLC, Landau Associates,
and Weinman Consulting LLC
Direct Comments to:
Rocale Timmons
City of Renton -Current Planning
Senior Plann e r
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
Tel: (425) 430-7219
Fax: (425) 430-7300
rti mmons@rentonwa.gov
Project Location:
See Exhibit 1 for physical locations. Sites are listed below:
• Hillcrest Terrace 1442 Hillcrest Lane NE
• Evergreen Terrace 3027 NE 15th
• Cole Manor 2811 NE 4TH
• Sunset Terrace: generally bounded by Sunset Lane NE and Glenwood Avenue NE on the north,
NE 10th Street on the east, NE Sunset Boulevard (State Route [SR] 900) on the south, and
Edmonds Avenue NE on the west
• Glennwood Townhomes 1141 & 1147 Glennwood Avenue
• Kirkland Town homes 1508 Kirkland Ave NE
• Golden Pines Apartments 2901 NE 10th
• Cedar River Terrace 51 Burnett Street
Exhibit 1. Renton Housing Authority Properties under Evaluation
Renton Housing Authority: Subsidized Properties
N 30th St
N 8th St
N 4th St
N 3rd St
•
Cedar River
Terrace
s 2nd St
rd St
·~11 BERK • ")"... ("!;,
NE 16th St
. .;, ......
Source: King Cou nty, City of Renton, BERK Consulting 2016
Nt 7tt, St
m a.
3
0
:l
~
):,.
<
11)
z m
'
~
0
:l
0 .,
):,.
< <t
z m
NE 12th St
NE 4tt: St r .
0 0 125 0 25 0 5 Mile s
Description of the Proposed Project (24 CFR 50.12 & 58.32; 40 CFR 1508.25]:
The proposal consists of Renton Housing Authority's (RHA's) proposed Capital Fund and Operating
Subsidy activities for 2016-2020. Activities include:
• Public Housing Authority-wide administration, operations, technical assistance, training, fees
and costs, and delivery of services such as summer youth programs.
• Low Income Public Housing Authority-wide maintenance including appliance replacement, non-
dwelling equipment and tools.
• Plans and designs of the Sunset Terrace Replacement Units (prior NEPA clearance in 2011).
• Maintenance, Rehabilitation, and Public Facility Improvements at Hillcrest Terrace, Evergreen
Terrace, and Cole Manor.
See Attachment A Project Description for details.
Statement of Purpose and Need for the Proposal (40 CFR 1508.9(b)J:
The purpose and need for the proposal is the proper operation and administration of the Renton
Housing Authority and its ongoing maintenance of low income public housing units and properties, as
well as staff training and equipment, and programs for residents.
The rehabilitation and site improvements will increase the livability and accessibility of the dwelling
units and sites by modernizing fixtures, removing asbestos containing materials, and removing ADA
barriers including replacing sidewalks and adding ramps and other improvements.
Existing Conditions and Trends [24 CFR 58.40(a)):
Without the project, dwellings and site improvements would continue to age and reach obsolescence,
and sites would continue to be less convenient or safe to navigate for residents and pedestrians in the
absence of sidewalk replacements or accessibility improvements.
Funding Information
RHA's Grant Number is WA 19PO 1150116. Exhibit 2 and Exhibit 3 identify the capital fund grant and
operating subsidy over the 2016-2020 period.
Exhibit 2 . Capital Fund Grant
Fiscal Vear Grant
WA01P011501-16 (FY 2016) $325,037 ---------------·------· ·--------
. _-;_~~-;~::~ -~~~;_----~~--=-=-=-~ -~ __ -------:::~:~~~: I
Estimated 2019 , $330,000
Estimated 2020 ______ ~ ~--~-:-~=-:=~:.==] $330,000 ·
Source: US HUD District 10, Renton Housing Authority 2016
Exhibit 3. 9per~ti!!gJuEs~y_ --_____ _
Fiscal Vear Subsidy
_ 2016 ____________________________ J_ $641,696 -·
Estimate based on 2016 LIPH inventory 2017 ; $600,000
. Estimate based on 2016 LIPH-in~e~;;ry201sfs600,000 I
Estimate based on 2016 LIPH inventory 2019 ! $600,000
_ g~ti_r11~t~_!Jased -~11~()~~J_P~ir1ventory 2020 1 $600,000 l
Source: US HUD District 10, Renton Housing Authority 2016
Estimated Total HUD Funded Amount:
See Exhibit 2 and Exhibit 3.
Estimated Total Project Cost (HUD and non-HUD funds) [24 CFR 58.32(d)J:
No other funds are included except HUD funds. For the total project cost see Exhibits 1 and 2.
Compliance with 24 CFR 50.4, 58.5, and 58.6 Laws and Authorities
Record below the compliance or conformance determinations for each statute, executive order, or
regulation. Provide credible, traceable, and supportive source documentation for each authority. Where
applicable, complete the necessary reviews or consultations and obtain or note applicable permits of
approvals. Clearly note citations, dates/names/titles of contacts, and page references. Attach additional
documentation as appropriate.
Compliance Factors: Statutes, Are formal Compliance determinations
Executive Orders, and compliance
Regulations listed at 24 CFR steps or
§58.5 and §58.6 mitigation
required?
STATUTES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, AND REGULATIONS LISTED AT 24 CFR 50.4 and 58.6
Airport Hazards Yes No No sites are in the Runway Protection Zone or
D r2J Accident Potential Zo ne.
24 CFR Part 51 Subpart D The Cedar River Terrace site is located outside
the area where height restrictions apply per FAR
Part 77 of Renton Municipal Airport. It is located
in the Traffic Pattern Zone (6); future
development is subject to review and potential
conditions regarding density, notice on titles,
and other provisions. No new units or
development are proposed on the subject site.
See RMC 4 -3 -020 Airport Related Height and
Use Restrictions. See worksheet in Attachment
Compliance Factors: Statutes, Are formal Compliance determinations
Executive Orders, and compliance
Regulations listed at 24 CFR steps or
§58.5 and §58.6 mitigation
required?
B, RMC 4-3-020 Airport Related Height And Use
Restrictions, and detailed height map Renton
Munici12al Air12ort Build i ng Height Restrictions.
Coastal Barrier Resources Yes No Not applicable. Renton is not located on the
D [gJ marine coast.
Coastal Barrier Resources Act, as
amended by the Coastal Barrier
Improvement Act of 1990 [16
USC 3501)
Flood Insurance Yes No The Cedar River Terrace site is located in the
D [gJ 500-year floodplain but no critical actions are
Flood Disaster Protection Act of proposed; physical activities are limited to
1973 and National Flood maintenance. See worksheet in Attachment B
Insurance Reform Act of 1994 [42 and map illustrating Zone X floodQla in boundary
USC 4001-4128 and 42 USC (500 year floodplain).
5154a)
-
STATUTES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, AND REGULATIONS LISTED AT 24 CFR 50 .4 & 58.5
Clean Air Yes No The PJ.,Jget So.!,!nd reg ioo_is considered a
[gJ D maintenance area, and is not designated a non-
Clean Air Act, as amended , attainment area . City of Renton regulations
particularly section 176(c) & (d); regarding construction apply and address dust
40 CFR Parts 6, 51, 93 and other matters; additional best management
practices are recommended to control dust. No
operational increases in traffic trips are
anticipated as no dwellings are added. Puget
Sound Clean Air Agency rules on Asbestos
Control Standards apply.
Coastal Zone Management Yes No The project is within the Washington coastal
tgJ D zone management area. The City of Renton
Coastal Zone Management Act, submitted its request for consistency
sect ions 307(c) & (d) determination to the Washington State
Department of Ecology (Ecology). See
Attachment C Department of Ecology
determination of consistency letter to City of
Renton.
Contamination and Toxic Yes No This review found no evidence of known or
Substances [gJ D suspected contamination at any of the three
properties. Therefore, no additional
24 CFR Part 50.3(i) & 58.5(i)(2) investigation is warranted based on the project
Compliance Factors: Statutes, Are formal Compliance determinations
Executive Orders, and compliance
Regulations listed at 24 CFR steps or
§58.5 and §58.6 mitigation
required?
as defined, and the information reviewed.
However, if evidence of potential contamination
is identified during project planning or
execution, procedures should be implemented
for sampling and analysis to evaluate the
suspect material and provide for appropriate
handling and disposal of the material to ensure
protection of human health and the
environment. See Attachment B including EDR
report excerpts. Full EDR reports for the three
sites where exterior site alterations are
proposed (Hillcrest Terrace, Evergreen Terrace,
and Cole Manor) are available with the
Environmental Review Record.
Endangered Species Yes No The capital and operating subsidy projects
~ D considered in 2016 for Hillcrest Terrace,
Endangered Species Act of 1973, Evergree n Terrace, and Cole Manor are not
particularly section 7; 50 CFR anticipated to result in increased runoff beyond
Part 402 current conditions and would not have the
potential to change pollutant loading relative to
current conditions due to: application of surface
water and aquifer protection standards in the
Renton Municipal Code, no net increase in
impervious area, and no new impervious
surfaces accessible to vehicular traffic.
Therefore no effect to listed fish species is
anticipated. Based on a review of the
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's
Priority Habitats and Species database no listed
wildlife species or critical habitat are found on
th e subject sites.
Explosive and Flammable Yes No There are no above ground storage tanks within
Hazards D ~ 1 mile of the sites where rehabilitation is
proposed. See Attachment B including EDR
24 CFR Part 51 Subpart C report excerpts. Full EDR reports for the three
sites where exterior site alterations are
proposed (Hillcrest Terrace, Evergreen Terrace,
and Cole Manor) are available with the
Environmental Review Rec ord.
Compliance Factors: Statutes, Are formal Compliance determinations
Executive Orders, and compliance
Regulations listed at 24 CFR steps or
§58.5 and §58.6 mitigation
required?
Farmlands Protection Yes No Not applicable. Sites are already developed for
D [SJ urban use. See Attachment B.
Farmland Protection Policy Act of
1981, particularly sections
1504(b) and 1541; 7 CFR Part 658
Floodplain Management Yes No The Cedar River Terrace site is located in the
D [SJ 500-year floodplain but no critical actions are
Executive Order 11988, proposed. See worksheet in Attachment Band
particularly section 2(a); 24 CFR map illustrating Zone X floodplain boundary
Part 55 (500 year floodplain).
Historic Preservation Yes No The project will not affect any previously
[SJ D recorded historic properties. See Attachment D.
National Historic Preservation None of the proposed activities at Cole Manor
Act of 1966, particularly sections and Hillcrest Terrace, nor the addition of the
106 and 110; 36 CFR Part 800 garbage recycling station at Hillcrest in March
2016, will affect aboveground historic
properties. The Evergreen Terrace facility, built
in 1968, was identified by DAHP as over 45 years
in age and in need of review at the EZ-2 level. A
short report form was provided to DAHP, and
DAHP found that no historic properties will be
affected by the current project as proposed in
correspondence dated August 4, 2016.
Compliance Factors: Statutes, Are formal Compliance determinations
Executive Orders, and compliance
Regulations listed at 24 CFR steps or
§58.5 and §58.6 mitigation
required?
Noise Abatement and Control Yes No Evergreen Terrace and Cole Manor are within
[g] D 1,000 feet of principal arterials ..
Noise Control Act of 1972, as
amended by the Quiet Evergreen Terrace at its closest point is about
Communities Act of 1978; 24 CFR 285 feet from the SR 900 centerline, and Cole
Part 51 Subpart B Manor is about 88 feet from the NE 3 rd Street
centerline west of Jefferson Avenue NE.
Using HUD's online tool, noise levels are
acceptable for Evergreen Terrace (not exceeding
65 db). No mitigation is needed.
Cole Manor is above 65 dB but not exceeding 70
dB, considered normally unacceptable for new
construction; attenuation is encouraged for
modernization. New construction of dwellings is
not proposed .
Since new concrete board siding is proposed
between the eaves and current brick fac;:ade, it is
recommended that the highest sound
transmission class (STC) rated board that meets
the capital program needs and resource s be
applied.
Sole Source Aquifers Yes No Cole Manor is located in the Cedar Valley sole
[g] D source aquifer; see Ceda r Valley 2 map. The
Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, project is not likely to affect Sole Source Aquifer
as amended, particularly section quality. Siz es of residential structures will stay
1424(e); 40 CFR Part 149 the same. Sizes of public facilities may slightly
expand impervious area (e.g . ADA
improvements). It is anticipated that sidewalk
replacements will be pervious leading to no-net-
increase in impervious area. Improvements are
subject to the City's aquifer protection
regulations and surface water design manual,
consist of non -pollutant generating surfaces,
and are in locations served by public water,
sewer, and storm drainage sy stems.
Wetlands Protection Yes No There are no known wetlands on subject
D [g] properties. See Attachment Band Wetl and s and
Executive Order 11990, Wate r _Cl~si_fo:a ti on;; map.
Compliance Factors: Statutes, Are formal Compliance determinations
Executive Orders, and compliance
Regulations listed at 24 CFR steps or
§58.5 and §58.6 mitigation
required?
particularly sections 2 and 5
Wild and Scenic Rivers None of the project sites are within proximity of
Yes No a Wild and Scenic River, based on a review of
Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of D ~ National Park Service information for
1968, particularly section 7(b ) Wclihington State .
and (c)
I ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE
-
Environmental Justice Yes No Proposed rehabilitation will improve the quality
D ~ of the indoor environment for residents (e.g.
Executive Order 12898 removal of asbestos containing material), and
will also improve access for elderly and disabled
residents (e.g. ADA improvements). No adverse
environmental impacts are anticipated.
Environmental Assessment Factors [24 CFR 58.40; Ref. 40 CFR 1508.8 &1508.27) Recorded below is the
qualitative and quantitative significance of the effects of the proposal on the character, features and
resources of the project area. Each factor has been evaluated and documented, as appropriate and in
proportion to its relevance to the proposed action. Verifiable source documentation has been provided
and described in support of each determination, as appropriate. Credible, traceable and supportive
source documentation for each authority has been provided. Where applicable, the necessary reviews
or consultations have been completed and applicable permits of approvals have been obtained or
noted. Citations, dates/names/titles of contacts, and page references are clear. Additional
documentation is attached, as appropriate. All conditions, attenuation or mitigation measures have
been clearly identified.
Impact Codes: Use an impact code from the following list to make the determination of impact for each
factor.
(1) Minor beneficial impact
(2) No impact anticipated
(3) Minor Adverse Impact -May require mitigation
(4) Significant or potentially significant impact requiring avoidance or modification which may require
an Environmenta l Impact Statement
Environmental Impact
Assessment Factor Code Impact Evaluation
LAND DEVELOPMENT
Conformance with 2 ~here will be no change in use of the subject sites; all are L~~
-
Plans/ Compatible for residential or mixed use/ residential-commercial purposes.
Land Use and Zoning/ • Hillcrest Terrace 1442 Hillcrest Lane NE: R-14
Scale and Urban • Evergreen Terrace 3027 NE 15th: Center Village
Design • Cole Manor 2811 NE 4TH : RM-F
• Sunset Terrace, SR 900: Center Village
• Cedar River Terrace 51 Burnett Street: Center Downtown
• Glennwood Townhomes 1141 & 1147 Glennwood
Avenue: R-14
• Golden Pines Apartments 2901 NE 101
h: Center Village
• Kirkland Townhomes 1508 Kirkland Ave NE: R-14
Proposed capital projects would be compatible with the scale
~nd pattern of existing land use. -
Soil Suitability/ Slope/ Some areas of steep slopes are mapped on the Hillcrest Terrace
Erosion/ Drainage/ 2 and Evergreen Terrace sites. Moderate landslides are mapped in
Storm Water Runoff ~he Evergreen Terrace area. Stormwater systems serve all sites
under review. See maps: Erosion Hazard , Landslide Hazard , Steep
~ and Storm Water . Where site disturbance is proposed for
ADA improvements, sidewalk replacements, and similar exterior
activities, the application of City regulations for critical areas ,
grading and erosion control, stormwater, landscaping, and
related standards in Renton Municipal code Title IV w i ll address
any potential impacts. (See list under Mitigation Measures and
~onditions below.)
Hazards and 3 See Contamination and Toxic Substances and Noise Abatement
Nuisances above. With proposed mitigation, no impacts are anticipated.
including Site Safety
and Noise
Energy Consumption 1 Some maintenance and rehabilitation includes implementation
of energy saving light bulbs.
Environm e ntal Impact
Assessment Factor Code Impact Evaluation
SOCIOECONOMIC
Employment and 2 No implementation of economic uses and no displacement of
Income Patterns businesses would occur.
Demographic 2 Units will be rehabilitated when vacated and made ready for
Character Changes, new tenants. No displacement would occur.
Displacement
Environmental Impact
Assessment Factor Code Impact Evaluation
COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES
Educational and 2 No facilities of this type will be added or displaced.
Cultural Facilities ---
-
-
Commercial Facilities 2 No facilities of this type will be added or displaced.
Health Care and Social 1 !Summer youth programs are proposed for funding.
Services
Solid Waste Disposal/ 2 ~ny construction will follow proper solid waste disposal per City
Recycling icodes {RMC 8-1). At Hillcrest Terrace and Cole Manor, collection
and storage of solid waste will be more efficient.
Waste Water/ 2 All sites are served by sewers; no change in numbers of dwelling
Sanitary Sewers units is proposed and no impacts are anticipated.
See: Wastewater.
Water Supply 2 All sites are served by the City's water system; no change in
numbers of dwelling units is proposed and no impacts are
~nticipated. See: Drinking Water .
Public Safety -Police, 2 All sites are served by the City's police and fire departments; no
Fire and Emergency K:hange in numbers of dwelling units is proposed and no impacts
Medical ~re anticipated. See: Fire Station Response Areas , and Pol ice
Deoartment Patrol Areas .
Parks, Open Space 2 !Sites are served by the Renton Parks system. No change in
and Recreation numbers of dwelling units is proposed and no impacts are
~nticipated. It should be noted that a central park is to be added
~t Sunset Terrace, ex panding and consolidating park area in the
r,..,icinity. See: Renton Trai ls and Bikewa}'s Guid e incl uding pa rks.
Transportation and 1 !Sites are served by local and state roads {see Arterials); no
Accessibility kiwellings are added and no increases in daily traffic are
~nticipated. Onsite ADA and sidewalk improvements wil l
improve accessibility by the disabled and elderly.
Environmental Impact
Assessment Factor Code Impact Evaluation
NATURAL FEATURES -
Unique Natural 2 rrhere are no onsite unique natural features. Water resources
Features, rv.,ill be protected by the nature of the proposals {e.g. replacing
Water Resources sidewalks with pervious materials) and application of City
stormwater requirements where applicable.
Vegetation, Wildlife 2 See endangered sp e ci es above.
Other Factors 2 None.
Additional Studies Performed:
List of Attachments:
A. Project Description
B. Checklists Regarding 24 CFR 50.4, 58.5, and 58.6 Laws and Authorities
C. Department of Ecology Coastal Zone Management Determination of Consistency Letter
D. Cultural Resources Assessment for the Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capital Facility Program,
Renton, King County, WA, Technical Memo, August 4, 2016, including Department of
Archaeology and Historic Preservation Letter, No Historic Properties Affected, August 4, 2016
Field Inspection (Date and completed by):
No field investigation was conducted . Sites were reviewed by aerial photos in Google Earth .
List of Sources, Agencies and Persons Consulted [40 CFR 1508.9{b)J:
Agencies:
Washington Department of Ecology, Coastal Zone Management (see Attachment C)
Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (see Attachment D)
Duwamish Tribe (see Attachment D)
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (see Attachment D)
Snoqualmie Indian Tribe (see Attachment D)
Renton Housing Authority, Mark Gropper, Sean McCarty
Schemata, Grace Kim, Guy Thoms e n
Sources and Additional Resources Used :
See Attachment B r egarding sources addressing 24 CFR 50.4, 58.5, and 58.6 Laws and Authorities.
City of Renton Map Gallery
AirQQ..d: Area Elev ations -South
Aguifer Protection
Arterials
Drin ki ng Wat~
Eros ion Hazard
Fire Station Response Areas
Flood rtaza rd
Landslide Ha zard
Police Department Patrol Areas
Renton Trails and Bikeways Guide
Steep Slopes
Storm Water
Wastewater
Wetlands and Wm_e1 Classifications
ZoDlrJ.9
Environmental Protection Agency: Sole Source Aquifer Maps: Cedar Va l ley 2
King County iMap: http://www,kingcounty.gov/services/gis/Maps/imap.aspx
WSDOT-Freight and Goods: http://wsdot.ma ps.arcgis.corrijhome/index.html
WSDOT Community Planning Portal: tillQ;//wsdot.maps.arcgis.com/home/index.htrllj
List of Permits Obtained:
The Hillcrest solid waste enclosure has received a Renton Building Permit. See Attachment B.
Requested clearances:
• Washington Department of Ecology: Certification of Consistency with Washington's Coastal
Zone Management Program for Federally Funded Activities (See Attachment C)
• Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Letter, No Historic Properties Affected,
August 4, 2016 (see Attachment D)
Programmatic maintenance and rehabilitation activities are subject to permits, including, but not limited
to:
• City of Renton building permits
• City of Renton Grading permits
• City of Renton Routine Vegetation Management Permits
• Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Asbestos/Demolition Notification Forms
As presented capital and operating subsidy activities are exempt from SEPA under these rules:
• WAC 197-11-800 (1) Minor new construction, (2) Other minor n ew construction, (3) Repair,
remodeling and maintenance activities, (6) Land use decisions, (14) Activities of agencies, (15)
Financial assistance grants, and other relevant subsections of WAC 197-11-800.
• City SEPA rules in RMC 4-9-070, including but not limited to: RMC 4-9-070.G.1.b which exempts
"landfills and excavations in WAC 197-11-SOO (l)(b)(v): Up to five hundred (500) cubic yards or
less."
Should grading or improvements or other activities exceed these thresholds, SEPA clearances will be
required.
Public Outreach [24 CFR 50.23 & 58.43):
A FONSI will be published in accordance with 24 CFR 58.43 -Dissemination and/or publication of the
findings of no significant impact. Accordingly a 15 -day comment period will be held.
Cumulative Impact Analysis [24 CFR 58.32]:
This Environmental Assessment has addressed the programs and activities of a 5-year capital facility
plan and operating subsidy, aggregating a number of exempt, categorically excluded, and other activiti es
subject to evaluation.
Alternatives [24 CFR 58.40(e); 40 CFR 1508.9]
Th e programmatic capital and operating proposals reflect categories of activities to meet federal, state,
and local requirements and meet the needs of residents to maintain properties, improve accessibility
under the ADA, remove obsolescent facilities and appliances, and remove hazards (asbestos containing
materials).
The proposal does not involve unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of availabl e resources.
Nevertheless, for the purposes of this evaluation, alternatives to exterior building alterations include:
different siding materials than concrete board . The primary objective is to reside Cole Manor due to
protect dwellings from the weather. Should a different material be appropriate to meet the objectives,
it may be considered.
The following alternatives are identified for site improvements:
• Removing or relocating sidewalks instead of replacing them
• Moving solid waste facilities to other site locations
• Removing or relocating fencing instead of replacing it
Current sidewa lks are buckling or in disrepair. Removing the sidewalks could remove hazardous
conditions if they exist, but would not improve accessibility. Sidewalks are general ly in location s where
usage is desired; wholesale relocation may not provide comparable efficient access. However, under the
proposal minor rerouting of sidewalks to avoid trees may occur when replacing the sidewalks.
Solid waste facilities are generally found in central locations for both residents and solid waste service
providers who regularly collect the waste. Relocating them rather than replacing them could mean
adding imperv iou s areas in new locations rather than making use of current disturbed areas.
Removing fencing could make sites less secure in terms of uninvited visitors; relocating fencing may
disturb new areas compared to replac i ng fencing.
No Action Alternative (24 CFR 58.40(e)J:
Under a No Action Alternative, maintenance, rehabilitation, and site improvements would not be
implemented. Without the project, dwellings and site improvements would continue to age and reach
obsolescence, and sites would continue to be less easy to navigate in the absence of sidewalk
replacements or accessibility improvements.
Summary of Findings and Conclusions :
The proposals as designed and conditioned will not adversely impact natural or built environment
conditions. Activities are compatible with the existing uses in the area. The proposed project also will
not adverse ly impact existing resources or services in the area .
Mitigation Measures and Conditions (40 CFR 1sos.2(cll
Summarize below all mitigation measures adopted by the Responsible Entity to reduce, avoid, or
eliminate adverse environmental impacts and to avoid non -compliance or non-conformance w ith the
above -listed authorities and factors. These measures/conditions must be incorporated into project
contracts, development agreements, and other relevant documents. The staff responsible for
implementing and monitoring mitigation measures should be clearly identified in the mitigation plan.
Mitigation Measures and Conditions
Law, Authority, or Factor
Clean Air
Contamination & Toxic Substances
Historic Preservation
Endangered Species, Surface Water,
Mitigation Measure
Comply with Puget Sound Clean Air Agency rules on Asbestos
Control Standards . Responsible Party: Contractors.
The City shall require all construction contractors to
implement air quality control plans for construction activities
in the project area. The air quality control plans should
include best management practices to control fugitive dust
and odors emitted by diesel construction equipment.
The following BMPs will be used to control fugitive dust.
• Use water sprays or other non-toxic dust control
methods on unpaved roadways.
• Minimize vehicle speed while traveling on unpaved
surfaces.
• Prevent trackout of mud onto public streets.
• Cover soil piles when practical.
Minimize work during periods of high winds when practical.
The following mitigation measures will be used to minimize
air quality and odor issues caused by tailpipe emissions.
• Maintain the engines of construction equipment
according to manufacturers' specifications.
• Minimize idling of equipment while the equipment is
not in use.
Responsible Party: City of Renton and Contractors.
No impacts are anticipated, but if evidence of potential
contamination is identified during project planning or
execution, procedures should be implemented for sampling
and analysis to evaluate the suspect material and provide for
appropriate handling and disposal of the material to ensure
protection of human health and the environment.
Responsible Party, Contractors.
No impacts to archaeological resources are anticipated. In the
event that ground disturbing or other activities do result in
the inadvertent discovery of archaeological deposits, work
should be halted in the immediate area and contact made
with DAHP in Olympia. Work should be halted until such time
as further investigation and appropriate consultation is
concluded . In the unlikely event of the inadvertent discovery
of human remains, work should be immediately halted in the
area, the discovery covered and secured against further
disturbance, and contact effected with law enforcement
personnel. Responsible Party, Contractors .
A. Use pervious materials to replace sidewalks to offset any
Law, Authority, or Factor
and Aquifer Protection Zones
Coastal Zone Management Act
Noise Abatement and Control
Code Authorities that Avoid Impacts:
City of Renton Municipal Code, Title IV
Mitigation Measure
added impervious areas for public facility or site
improvements (e.g. solid waste enclosures or ADA
improvements), to achieve no-net-increase in site impervious
areas. Alternatively, implement best management practices
that achieve low impact development objectives and the
surface water design manual standards.
8. Reroute public facility improvements (e.g. replacement
sidewalks) to retain trees. Alternatively replant trees if tree
removal is necessary consistent with City standards (RMC 4-4-
130).
C. Comply with City surface water design manual as
appropriate.
Responsible Party: Renton Housing Authority.
Apply as appropriate for a permit or certification for State
water quality requirements if exceeding state thresholds.
Comply with City surface water design manual as appropriate
under any circumstance. Responsible Party: Renton Housing
Authority.
At Cole Manor seek the highest sound transmission class
rated siding that meets capital facility needs and resources.
Responsible Party: Renton Housing Authority. (See
Attachment B for links to guidance documents.)
Chapter 4 CITY-WIDE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
4-3-050 CRITICAL AREAS REGULATIONS
4-4-030 DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS -GENERAL
4-4-040
4-4-060
4-4-070
4 -4-090
4-4-130
FENCES, HEDGES, AND RETAINING WALLS
GRADING, EXCAVATION AND MINING REGULATIONS
LANDSCAPING
REFUSE AND RECYCLABLES STANDARDS
TREE RETENTION AND LAND CLEARING REGULATIONS
Chapter 5 BUILDING AND FIRE PREVENTION STANDARDS
Chapter 6, 4-6-030 DRAINAGE {SURFACE WATER) STANDARDS
Chapter 8 PERMITS -GENERAL AND APPEALS
Chapter 9 PERMITS -SPECIFIC
4-9-080 GRADING, EXCAVATION AND MINING PERMITS AND LICENSES
4-9-195 ROUTINE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PERMITS
Determination:
[8J Finding of No Significant Impact [24 CFR S8.40(g)(l); 40 CFR 1508.27]
The project will not result in a significant impact on the quality of the human environment.
D Finding of Significant Impact f24 CFR 58.40(g)(2); 40 CFR 1508.27]
The project may significantly affect the quality of the human environment.
t ;}
. ~.;
~,.-~ :·; .,· ./ i' ·I~.: ( -· I _, . ·-• . ', '---.
•/ Date: Preparer Signature:
Name/Title/Organization: Manager, BERK Consulting
Certifying Officer Signature:
City of Renton Environmental Review Committee {ER
Date: q,/ ;_ ;//(
August 22, 2016
Signature:;_::::0.=:::::::.::·--==---..:i....c__.::=::::====-.;;;..-<,.iL
Signature:_-"'-~-}./'-, -=,::..==....~____c~==~~~l.-.4------
Signature:. __ -J-_,__ ___________ _
This original, signed document and related supporting material must be retained on file by the
Responsible Ent i ty in an Environmental Review Record (ERR) for the activity/project (ref: 24 CFR Part
58.38) and in accordance with recordkeeping requirements for the HUD program(s).
Renton Housing Authority
2900 NE 10th St
Renton. WA 98056
Christine Littleton
US Environmental Protection Agency
1200 6th Ave, MS-OERA-202 -3
Seattle, WA 98101
Sara Jensen
US Department of HUD
909 1st Ave, Ste. 255
Seattle. WA 98104
Cecile Hanson
Duwamish Tribe
4705 W Marginal Way SW
Seattle, WA 98106
Deborah Peavler-Stewart
US Department of HUD
909 1st Ave, Ste 255
Seattle. WA 98104
Cherie Shanks
US Dept. of Housing and Urban
Development
909 First Ave, Ste. 360
Seattle, WA 98104
Mark Gropper
Renton Housing Authority
PO Box 2316
Renton, WA 98056
Denis Law Mayor
Community & Economic Development C. E. "Chi p " Vi nce nt, Ad m in ist r ato r
October 20, 2016
Cherie Shanks, General Engineer
Office of Public Housing
U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development
909 First Ave., Suite 360
Seattle, WA 98104-1000
Dear Ms. Shanks:
Please accept the enclosed Request for Release of Funds for the Sunset Terrace
Redevelopment proposed by the Renton Housing Authority. Attached to thi s letter you
will find the following documentation:
• Request for Relea se of Funds and Certification (HUD-7015.15) including attached
signature sheet from the City's Environmental Review Committee and memo from
Mayor Law designating this body as Responsible Entity under NEPA .
• Affidavits of mailing and Posting, and a copy of the published notice documenting
public notification process and procedures
• Conditions of Approval containing mitigation requirements for this project.
• Copy of the FONSI and EA issued for this project
This documentation should complete the Request for Release of Funds for this project.
Please contact me at (425) 430-7314 if you have any questions .
Sincerely,
Vanessa Dolbee
Current Planning Manager
1055 Sou th Grad y Way, Re nto n, WA 980 57 • re nto nw a.g ov
Request for Release of F,·-1s
and Certification
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development
Office of Community Planning
0MB No. 2506-0087
(exp. 07/31 /2017)
and Development ~ O\O \(e(~uf\Y--
This form is to be used by Responsible Entities and Recipients (as defined in 24 CFR 58.2) when requesting the release of funds, and
requesting the authority to use such funds , for HUD programs identified by statutes that provide for the assumption of the environmental
review responsibil ity by units of general local government and States. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated
to average 36 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. This agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless that collection displays a valid 0MB control number.
Part 1. Program Description and Request for Release of Funds (to be completed by Responsible Entity)
-,---------------
1. Program Title(s) 2 . HUD/State Identification Number 3. Recipient Identification Number
Capital Fund Program & Operating Subsidy Funds (see 11 below) WAO 11 (optional)
4 . 0MB Catalog Number(s) 5. Name and address of responsible entity
--------------------. City of Renton
6. For information about this request , contact (name & phone numbe r) 1055 S . Grady Way
Mark Gropper, phone: 425-226-1850, Ext. 223 Renton, WA 98055
-~ -------------------+-------~----,--,----cc---,-----,---,--,----
7. Name and address of recipient (if different than responsible entity) 8. HUD or State Agency and office unit to receive request
HUD Seattle Region X Office
909 1st Avenue, Suite 200
Seattle, WA 98104-1000
Renton Housing Authority
PO Box 2316
Renton, WA 98056
-------------------------~
The recipient(s) of assistance under the program(s) listed above requests the release of funds and removal of environmental
grant conditions governing the use of the assistance for the following
9. Program Activity(ies)/Project Name(s) 10. Location (Street address, city, county, State)
• Hillcrest Terrace 1442 Hillcrest Lane NE
• Evergreen Terrace 3027 NE 151h
• Cole Ma nor 28 11 NE 4T H
Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating
Subsidy Proposed Activities for 2016 -2020
• Su nset Terrace NE Sunset Bo ulevard at Harrington Ave nue N
'\../ 11. Program Activity/Project Description
~he proposal consists of Renton Housing Authority's (RHA's) proposed Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy activities for
2016-2020. Activities include:
• Public Housing Authority-wide administration, operations, technical assistance, training , fees and costs, and delivery of
services such as summer youth programs.
• Low Income Public Housing Authority-wide maintenance including appliance replacement, non-dwelling equipment and tools.
• Plans and designs of the Sunset Terrace Replacement Units (prior NEPA clearance in 2011 ).
• Maintenance, Rehabilitation, and Public Facility Improvements at Hillcrest Terrace, Evergreen Terrace, and Cole Manor.
The request is to the US Department of Housing and Urban Development for the release of Annual Contributions Contract
Number SF-187, Amendment Number 22-N , Grant Number WA01 P01150116, Capital Fund Program, and Operating Subsidy
funds under 24 CFR Part 905 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, Section 9, to undertake a project known as WA011
Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy Proposed Activities for 2016 -2020.
Previous editions are obsolete form HU0-7015.15 (1/99)
Request for Release of
and Certification
U.S. Department of Housini
and Urban Development
Office of Community Planning
0MB No. 2506 -0087
(exp. 07/3 112017)
Th is form is to be used by Responsible Entities and Recipie nts (as defi ned in 24 CF ){.-\"YA, ~~ f funds, and
and Developme[
re questing th e authority to use such funds, for HUD programs identified by statutes ·"" e nv ironmental
review responsibil ity by units of general local gove rnment and States. P ublic reporting urden fo r th is collection of information is estimated
to average 36 m i nutes per response. including the time fo r re viewing instructions. searchi ng existing data sources, gathering and
mainta ini ng the data needed , and completing and reviewing the collection of information. This agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
a person is not requ i red to respond to. a co lle ctio n of i nformation unless th at coll ection d isplays a valid 0 MB control nu mber.
Part 1. Program Description and Request for Release of Funds (to be completed by Responsible Entity)
1. Program Title(s) 2 HUD/State Ident ificat ion Number
Capita l F und Program & Operating Subsidy F und s (see 11 below) WAO 11
3. Recipien t Ident ifica tion Num ber
(optional)
4 . 0MB Ca talog Number(s) 5 . Name and address of responsible entity
----------------------------, City of Renton
6. For informat ion about th is request. con ta ct (nam e & phone number) 1055 S . Grady Way
Mark Gropper, phone: 425-226-1850, Ext. 223 Renton , WA 98055
8. HUD or State Agency and office unit to receive request
HUD Seattle Region X Office
7. Name and addres s of re cip ient (if diffe ren t th an respons ibl e en t ity)
Renton Housing Authorit y
909 1st Avenue , Suite 200 PO Box 2316
Seattle, WA 98104-1 000 Renton , WA 98056
The rcc ipicnt(s) of assistance under the program(s) listed above requests the release of funds and re moval of environmental
grant conditions governing the use of the assistance for the following
9. Program Activity(ie s)/Project Name(s) 10. Locat ion (Street address . city county , State )
Renton Housing Authority Capita l Fund and Operating See box 11
Subsidy Proposed Activities for 20 16 -2020
11. Prog ram Activity/P rojec t Description
The Renton Hou sing Authority manages eight subsidized propertie s that are available to low income househo lds or low-income
senior o r disabl ed households. These are: A ) Hillcrest Terrace 1442 H illcrest Lane NE; B) Evergree n Terrace 3027 NE 15th; C )
Cole Manor 2811 NE 4th ; D) Sunset Terrace: generally bounded by NE 10 S treet and Glennwood Avenue NE, SR 900 , and
Edmon ds Ave NE; E) Glennwood Townh omes 1141 & 1 147 Glennwood Ave; F ) K irkland Town homes 1508 Kirk land Ave NE;
G) Golden P ines Apartments 2901 NE 10th ; and H ) Cedar R i ver Terrace 51 Burnett Street . All the properties are located i n th e
same genera l area i n t he City of Renton.
Activities proposed under the Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy for the period 2016 -2020 include: 1) Pub lic H o u sing
Authority-wide administration , ope rations, technical assi stanc e, training , fees and costs, and delivery of services such as
su mmer youth programs. 2) Low Income Public Housing Authority -wide mai ntenance including appliance rep lacement,
non-dwelling equ i pment and tools. 3) P lans and designs o f the Sunset Terrace R eplacemen t U n its (prior NEPA clearance in
2 011 ). 4 ) Maintenance, Reh abilitation, and Pu b li c Facility Improvements at Hillc rest Terrace , E vergreen Terrace, and Cole
Manor.
The request is to the US D e partment of Housing and Urban Development for the re lease o f Annua l Contributions Contract
Number SF-187, Amendment Number 22-N , Grant Number WA0 1 PO 1150116, Capital Fund Program, and Operating Subsidy
funds under 24 CFR Part 905 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, Section 9, to undertake a project known as WA01 1
R enton H ousing Authority Capital Fund and O p erating Subsidy Proposed Activities for 2016 -2020.
Previous ed itions are obso lete form HUD-7015 .15 (1199)
Pa r t 2. Environme ntal Certificatio n (to be comp le tt:d by rt:s ponsib lt: t:nli ty)
With reference to the above Program Activity(ies)/Project(s), I, the undersigned officer of the responsible entity, certify that:
1. The respons ible entity has fully carried out its respons ibi lities for environmenta l review. decision -making an d action pertai ning
to the project(s) named above.
2. The respons ible entity has assumed responsib ility for and compl ied with and w ill continue to comply with , the National
Environmental Po licy Act o f 1969, as amended, and the env ironmenta l procedures, permit requi rements and statuto ry o bligat ions
of the laws cited in 24 CFR 58 .5: an d also agree s to comply w ith the authorities in 24 CflZ 58.6 and a pp licable Sta te and local
laws .
3 . T he responsible entity has assumed responsib il ity for and compl ied wi t h and w ill continue to comply with Sec tion 106 of th e N at ion al
H istoric Pr eservation Act, and its imp lementing regulations 36 C'F R 800, inclu d ing consu lt ati on ,v ith the State H istoric Prese rvation
Offi ce r. Indian tr ibes and Native Hawaiian organizations, and the pu blic.
4 . At1er considering the type a nd degree of environmental effects identi lied by the environmental review comp leted fo r the proposed
projt:ct descr ibed in Part I of'this request. I have found that !ht: pro posa l did D did not [Z] require the preparation and
dissem ina ti on ofan environmenta l impact statement.
5. The respons ible entity has d isseminated and.for pub lis hed in the manner presc r ibed by 24 (TR 58.43 and 58 .55 a notice to the public
in accordance with 24 CF R 58.70 and as ev idenced by the attached copy (copies) or ev idence of post ing and ma ilin g procedure.
6 . T he d ate s for all statutory and regu latory time periods fo r rev iew, comment or ot he r action are in comp liance with procedures and
req uirements of 24 CF R Part 58.
7 . In accordance w ith 24 CFR 58 .7 1(b), the res ponsible entity will advise the recip ient (if d ifferent from the responsible entity) of
any speci al environmental conditions that must be adhered to in carrying out the project.
As the duly de s ignated certil'ying ol'fic ial ol'the respo nsi ble ent ity. I also certi fy that:
8. I am authorized to and do consent to assume the status of Fed era l offic ial under the National Env ironment al P ol icy Act of 1969
and each provision of law designated in the 24 C'fR 58 .5 li st of NEP A-re lated authorities in sofar as the prov is ion s of these la ws
ap pl y to the HUD responsibilities for environmental review, decision-mak ing and action that have been assumed by the res po nsib le
ent ity .
9. l am authorized to and do accept. on behalf' of the rec ipient pt:rsona lly . the j urisd iction o f' th e Federal courts for the enforcement
of all these responsib i I it ies, in my capac ity as certifying officer of the re s ponsi ble ent ity.
Signature of Certifying Officer of the Responsible Entity Title of Certify ing Officer
Date signed
X
Address of Certifying Officer
City of Renton, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055
Part 3. To be co mpleted when th e Recipient is no t th e Res pons ible E n tit~·
T he rec ipi ent req uests the release of funds for the programs and activities identified in Part I and ag rees to abide by the s pec ial
conditions, procedures and requirement s of the environmental review and to advise the respons ible entity of any proposed change in
the scope of the project o r any change in environmenta l cond itions in acco rda nce with 24 C FR 58.71(b).
Signa ture of Author ized Officer of the Recipient Titl e of A uthorized Officer
Executive Director
Date signed
/0. 18. io(J
Warning: HUD wi ll prosecu te false clai ms and statements. Convi ction may result i n criminal and/or c ivil pen alties. (18 U .S.C . 1001 1010. 1012; 31 U.S.C .
3729, 3802)
Pr evious editions ar e obsolete form HUD -7015.15 (1/99)
Denis Law Mayor
Community & Economic Development C. E. "Chip" Vin cent, Administrator
September 20, 2016
Cherie Shanks, General Engineer
Office of Public Hou sing
U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development
909 First Ave., Suite 360
Seattle, WA 98104-1000
Dear Ms. Shanks:
Please accept the enclosed Request for Release of Funds for the Sunset Terra ce
Redevelopment proposed by the Renton Housing Authority. Attached to th is letter you
will f ind the following documentation:
• Request for Release of Funds and Certification (HUD-7015.15) including attached
signa ture sheet from the City's En v ironmental Review Committee and memo from
Mayor Law designating this body as Responsible Entity under NEPA.
• Affidavits of mailing and Posting, and a copy of the published notice documenting
public notification process and procedures
• Conditions of Approval containing mitigation requirements for this project.
• Copy of the FONSI and EA issued for this project
This documentation should complete the Request for Release of Funds for this project.
Please contact me at (425) 430-7289 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
~l"&YA~___,,_,_,
Va nessa Dolbee
Current Planning Manager
1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 • rento nwa.gov
Request for Release of r Lmds
and Certification
U.S. Department of Housin~
and Urban Development
Office of Community Planning
and Development
0MB No. 2506-0087
(exp. 07/31/2017)
This form is to be used by Responsible Entities and Re c ipients (as defined in 24 CFR 58.2) when requesti ng the re lease of funds, and
req uesting the authority to use such funds, for HUD programs ide ntified by statutes that provide for the assumption of the environmental
review responsibility by units of general local government and States. Publ ic reporting burden for this collection of informat ion is estimated
to average 36 minutes per response, includi ng the t ime for reviewing instructions. search ing existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed. and completing and rev iewin g the collection of information. This agency may not conduct or sponsor. and
a person is not required to respond to . a collection of information unless that col lect ion displays a val id 0MB control number.
Part 1. Program Description and Request for Release of Funds (to be completed by Responsible Entity)
1. Program Title(s ) 2. HUD/State Identification Number
Capital Fund Program & Operating Subsidy Funds (see 11 below) WAQ 11
3 . Recipient Identification Number
(optional )
4. 0MB Catalog Number(s ) 5. Name and address of respons ible ent ity
--,--..,,,--,-----------------,--------, City of Renton
6. For info rma tion about this request. contact (name & phone number) 1 055 S . Grady Way
Mark Gropper, phone: 425-226-1850, Ext. 223 Renton, WA 98055
8. HUD or State Agency and office unit to rece ive request
HUD Seattle Region X Office
1 7. Name and address of rec1p1e nt (1f different than re spons ible ent ity)
1 Renton Housing Authority
909 1st Avenue, Suite 200 PO Box 2316
Seattle, WA 98104-1000 Renton, WA 98056
The rccipient(s) of assistance under the program(s) listed above requests the release of funds and removal of environmental
grant conditions governing the use of the assistance for the following
9. Program Activ ity(ies)/Project Name (s)
Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating
Subsidy Proposed Activities for 2016 -2020
11. Program Activity /Project Description
10. Location (Street address . city, county, State)
• Hillcrest Terrace 1442 Hillcrest Lane NE
• Eve rgreen Terrace 3027 NE 15th
• Cole Manor 2811 NE 4TH
• Sunset Te rrace NE Su nset Bo ulevard at Ha rring ton Avenue N
The proposal consists of Renton Housing Authority's (RHA's) proposed Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy activities for
2016-2020. Activities include:
• Public Housing Authority-wide admin istration , operations, technical assistance , training , fees and costs, and delivery of
services such as summer youth programs.
• Low Income Public Housing Authority-wide maintenance including appliance replacement, non-dwelling equipment and tools.
• Plans and designs of the Sunset Terrace Replacement Units (prior NEPA clearance in 2011 ).
• Maintenance, Rehabilitation, and Public Facility Improvements at Hillcrest Terrace, Evergreen Terrace, and Cole Manor.
The request is to the US Department of Housing and Urban Development for the release of Annual Contributions Contract
Number SF-187, Amendment Number 22-N, Grant Number WA01 P01150116, Capital Fund Program, and Operating Subsidy
funds under 24 CFR Part 905 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, Section 9, to undertake a project known as WA011
Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy Proposed Activities for 2016 -2020.
Pre vious editions are obsolete form HUD-7015.15 (1 /99)
Part 2. Environmental Certification (to be completed by responsibk entity)
With reference to the above Program Activity(ies)/Project(s), I, the undersigned officer of the responsible entity, certify that:
I. The responsible entity has fully carried out its responsibilities for environmental review, decision-making and action pertaining
to the project(s) named above.
2 . The responsible entity has assumed responsibility fo r and complied with and will continue to comply with, the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, a nd the environmental procedures, permit requirements and statutory obligations
of t he laws cited in 24 C:FR 58.5; and also agrees to comply with the authorities in 24 CFR 58.6 and applicable State and local
laws.
3. The responsible entity has assumed respons ibility for and complied with and will continue to comply with Sect ion I 06 of the National
Historic Preservation Act, and its implementing regulations 36 CFR 800, including consultation with the State Historic Preservation
Officer, Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian o rganizations, and the public.
4. After considering the type and degree of environmental effects identified by the environmental review completed for the proposed
project described in Part 1 of this request, l have found that the proposal did O did not [Z] require the preparation and
dissemination of an environmental impact statement.
5. The responsible entity has disseminated and/or published in the manner prescribed by 24 CFR 58.43 and 58.55 a notice to the publ ic
in accordance with 24 CFR 58.70 and as evidenced by the attached copy (copies) or evidence of posting and mailing procedure.
6. The dates for all statutory and regulatory time periods for review, comment or other action are in compliance with procedures and
requirements of 24 CFR Par1 58.
7. In accordance with 24 CfR 5 8 .7l(b), the responsible entity will advise the recipient (if different from the responsible entity) of
any special environmental conditions that must be adhered to in carrying out the project.
As the duly designated certifying official of the responsible entity, I also certify that:
8. I u1n author!zed to and de consent to :.1ssu1ne the st~t'~s cf Feder~! cffic~~1 ttr1der the ~!uticru1! Environmental Policy /\ct of I 969
and each provision oflaw designated in the 24 CFR 58 .5 list of NEPA-related authorities in sofar as the provisions of these laws
8pply to tht:' IITJD rt:'sponsibilities for er:viror1rnentaJ r'=vie'.1.', deci$ion-m::!Y..ing ;;!!1d ~cbcr1 th2.t h2.'..:c bee~ 2.~~umed by the re~pon s!b]e
enti ty.
9 . l am authorized to a nd do accept. o n behalf of the recipi ent personally, the jurisdiction of the federal courts for the enforcement
of all these respons ibilities, in my capacity as cert ifying officer o f the responsi ble entity.
Signature of Certifying Officer of the Responsible Entity Title of Certifying Officer
X
Date signe
Cl / l°! );;o I
ore)'
City of Renton, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055
Part 3. To be completed when the Recipient is not the Responsible Entity
The recipient requests the release of funds for the programs and activities identified in Part 1 and agrees to abide by the s pecia l
conditions. procedures and requireme nts of the environmental review and to advise the responsible entity of any proposed change in
the scope of the project or any change in environmental condi tions in accordance with 24 CFR 58.71 (b ).
Signature of Authorized Officer of the Recipient Title of Authorized Officer
/l
~xe cutfve Director
Date signed
09.1 </. ').O/C
Warn ing: HUD v~II prosecute false claims and statements. Conviction may result in criminal and/or civil penalties . (18 U.S.C. 1001 , 1010, 1012: 31 U.S.C.
3729, 3802)
Previous editio ns are obsolete form HUD-7015.15 (1/99)
Signature Sheet for Certifying Officer of Responsible
Entity for Request for Release of Funds and Certification
Project: WAOll Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund
and Operating Subsidy Proposed Activities for 2016 -
2020 Environmental Assessment
Responsible Entity Certifying Officer
City of Renton Environmental Review Committee (ERC)
Signature t_\(\<'p 3 I ~ /Ylf~
I f -~
Signature: CJE:, \J "--
Signature:~ ~
Signature: _________ _
1
EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
July 27, 2010
Sunset Area Planned Action and EIS File
Denis Law, Mayor~ -f_.
Responsible Entity Under NEPA
In Renton Municipal Code section 4-9-070G, the City of Renton designates the
Environmental Review Committee (ERC), as appointed by the Mayor of Renton, as the
responsible official under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). It is the
responsibility of the ERC to supervise scoping and preparations of any required
environmental impact statement, or related documents. Various federal statutes, and
regulations of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (24 CFR 58.1 and 24
CFR 58.4), authorize the City to serve as the Responsible Entity for purposes of
compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (42 USC 4321). The functions of
the Responsible Entity under NEPA are similar to those of the responsible official under
SEPA. Therefore, I designate the ERC as the entity with authority to perform the
functions and provide the certifications required of the Responsible Entity under NEPA.
h:\exec\forms\memo forms\excc standard memo.doc:
CITY OF RENTON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT-PLANN ING DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
On the 261h day of August, 2016, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing
ERC Notice and Determination documents. This information was sent to:
' \ <r '.;i •,' .· ., Name _., Representing "
', "h
...
~( ·; cl: .,.
Agencies See Attached
Mark Gropper, RHA Applicant/Owner
Signature of Sender): ~ 6'NiJ\ ~MAN )\J \
TATE OF WASHINGTON s
ss
COUNTY OF KING
I certify under penalty of perjury under the la w s of the State of Washington that the fore g oing is true and correct,
I know or have satisfactory evidence that Sabrina Mirante
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/h?r: eir free and vo luntary act for the. uses a.nd. purposes
mentio ned in the instrument. \ ( . l\ .,,,,\\\\\1111 . I , ..... , . ... 11, ~ \l ' I •• ..:..~ ,,'f\,i-\ '?, /l,-1, f f/ -1 (. / / I --.,.\";.~ ,,,\,,\•11,111 Q'J I; Dated: r .--/ 0 -\.o -~ .. ~ : (; ,.:-':..s10N ,.,,1,,,. :;., 11
N\?tary Public in an'clf.?I the St f e ofwa~Trt§tor:~\. ~
( ) 1·· (\ -; ~ u -" #, (/l ;; :; \ .,, . .r --: .-~
Notary (Print): L ~1 , _ ,;.. en':;., "'u. ,0 f < ~
' "\ 1 ~~ /' ~ \.. --
Project Name: Renton Ho usin g Authority Capital Fund and Operating Sub sidy RROF -2016-2020
Project Number:. LUA16 -000630, ECF
te mplate -affidavit of service by m ai li ng
Dept. of Ecology • •
Env i ronmental Review Section
PO Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
WSDOT Northwest Region •
Attn : Ramin Pazooki
King Area Dev. Serv ., MS-240
PO Box 330310
Seattle, WA 98133-9710
US Army Corp. of Engineers*
Seattle District Office
Attn: SEPA Reviewer
PO Box C-3755
Seattle, WA 98124
Boyd Powers•••
Depart. of Natural Resou r ces
PO Box 47015
Ol y mpia, WA 98~04-7015
KC Dev. & Envi ronmenta l Serv .
Attn: SEPA Section
35030 SE Douglas St. #210
Snoqu al m ie, WA 98065
Metro Transit
Senior Environmental Planner
Gary Kriedt
201 South Jackso n Street KSC -TR-0431
Seattle, WA 98104-3856
Seattle Publ ic Utilities
Jalaine Madura,
Attn: SEPA Responsib le Official
700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900
PO Box 34018
Seattle, WA 98124-4018
AGENCY (DOE) LEITER MAILlr..iG
(ERC DETE RM INATIONS)
Dept. of Ecology **
Attn: Misty Blai r
PO Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
Duwamish Tribal Office •
4717 W Ma r gina l Way SW
Seattle, WA 98106-1514
KC Wastewater Treatment Divis ion •
Environmenta l Planni ng Sup ervisor
Ms . Sh i rley Marroquin
201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050
Seattle, WA 98104-3855
WDFW -Larry Fisher•
1775 12th Ave. NW Su ite 201
Issaquah, WA 98027
City of Newcastle
Attn: Tim McHarg
Director of Community Development
12835 Newcastle Way, Ste 200
Newcastle, WA 98056
Puget Sound Energy
Wendy Weiker, Community Svcs. Mgr.
355 llO'h Ave NE
Mailstop EST llW
Bellevue, WA 98004
Puget Sound Energy
Doug Corbin, Muni ci pal Liaison Mgr.
6905 South 2281h St
Kent, WA 98032
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fishe r ies Dept.**
Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer
39015 -172nd Avenue SE
Auburn, WA 98092
Muckleshoot Cu ltural Resources Program • •
Attn: Laura Murphy
39015 172nd Avenue SE
Auburn, WA 98092-9763
Muckl eshoot Cu ltural Resources Program • •
Attn: Erin Slaten
39015 172nd Avenue SE
Auburn, WA 98092-9763
Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservat ion•
Attn : Gretchen Kaeh ler
PO Box 48343
Olympia, WA 98504-8343
City of Kent
Attn: Charl ene Anderson, AICP, ECD
220 Fourt h Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032-5895
City of Tukwila
Jack Pace, Responsible Official
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwi la, WA 98188
*Note: If the Notice of Applicat ion states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities
will need to be se nt a copy of the Enviro n mental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of
Application.
**Department of Ecology is emai led a copy of the Env i ronmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Noti ce to
the followi ng ema i l address: se paunit@ecy.wa .gov
** Karen Walter, Laura Murphy and Er in Slaten with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. are
ema iled a copy of the Environmental Check li st, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email
ad dresses : KWal ter@muck leshoot .nsn.us / Lau r a .murphy@mucklesh oot.nsn.u s /
er i n. s l aten@m uc kles hoot. nsn. us
** *Department of Natural Reso u r ces is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT,
& Notice the following email address: sepacenter@ dnr.wa.gov
template -affidavit of servi ce by m ailing
Department of Community and
Economic Development
NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST RELEASE OF FUNDS
FOR SUNSET TERRACE REDEVELOPMENT
DATE OF NOTICE: August 26, 2016
NAME OF RESPONSIBLE ENTITY: City of Renton
LAND USE NUMBER: LUA16-000630, ECF
ADDRESS: Environmental Review Committee
Care of: Department of Community & Economic Development, Current Planning, 1055 South Grady WA,
Renton, WA 98055
STAFF CONTACT: Vanessa Dolbee, 425-430-7200
,\)JE CT NAME: Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy RROF-2016 -2020
These notices shall satisfy two separate but related procedural requirements for activities to be
undertaken by the Renton Housing Authority.
REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS
On or about September 13, 2016 the City of Renton will authorize the Renton Housing Authority to submit
a request to the US Department of Housing and Urban Development for the release of Annual
Contributions Contract Number SF-187, Amendment Number 22-N, Grant Number WA01P01150116,
Capital Fund Program, and Operating Subsidy funds under 24 CFR Part 905 of the United States Housing
Act of 1937, Section 9, to undertake a project known as WA011 Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund
and Operating Subsidy Proposed Activities for 2016-2020 for the purpose of maintenance, rehabilitation,
and operation of public housing, at about $330,000 annually for capital funds and up to $642,000 annually
for operating subsidies, between 2016-2020.
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
The City of Renton has determined that the project will have no significant impact on the human
environment. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) is not required. Additional project information is contained in the Environmental
Review Record (ERR) on file at the City of Renton, Department of Community & Economic Development,
Development Services, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 9805, where ERR can be examined and may
be examined or copied weekdays 8 A.M to 5 P.M.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any individual, group, or agency may submit written comments on the ERR to the City of Renton
Environmental Review Committee. All comments received by: September 12, 2016 will be considered by
the City of Renton prior to authorizing submission of a request for release of funds. Comments should
specify which Notice they are addressing.
ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION
The City of Renton certifies to HUD that the Environmental Review Committee consents to accept the
jurisdiction of the Federal Courts if an action is brought to enforce responsibilities in relation to the
environmental review process and that these responsibilities have been satisfied. HU D's approval of the
certification satisfies its responsibilities under NEPA and related laws and authorities and allows the City
of Renton to use Program funds.
OBJECTIONS TO RELEASE OF FUNDS
HUD will accept objections to its release of fund and the City of Renton's certification for a period of fifteen
days following the anticipated submission date or its actual receipt of the request (whichever is later) only
if they are on one of the following bases: (a) the certification was not executed by the Certifying Officer
of the City of Renton; (b} the City of Renton has omitted a step or failed to make a decision or finding
required by HUD regulations at 24 CFR part 58; (c) the grant recipient or other participants in the
dev elopment process have committed funds, incurred costs or undertaken activities not authorized by 24
CFR Part 58 before approval of a release of funds by HUD; or (d) another Federal agency acting pursuant
to 40 CFR Part 1504 has submitted a written finding that the project is unsatisfactory from the standpoint
of environmental quality. Objections must be prepared and submitted in accordance with the required
procedures (24 CFR Part 58, Sec. 58.76) and shall be addressed to HUD at Seattle Regional Office, Seattle
Federal Office Building, Office of Public Housing, 909 First Avenue, Suite 360, Seattle, WA 98104-1000.
Potential obj ec tors should contact HUD to verify the actual last day of the objection period.
Responsible Entity Certifying Officer
City of Renton Environmental Review Committee (ERC)
Date of Decision: August 22, 2016
Date of Publication: August 26, 2016
NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST RELEASE OF FUNDS FOR SUNSET
TERRACE REDEVELOPMENT
DATE OF NOTICE:
NAME OF RESPONSIBLE ENTITY:
LAND USE NUMBER:
ADDRESS:
STAFF CONTACT:
PROJECT NAME:
August 26, 2016
City of Renton
LUA16-000630, ECF
Environmental Review Committee
Care of: Department of Commun ity & Economic De ve lopment, Current Planning
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Vanessa Dolbee, 425-430-7200
Renton Housing Authority Capita l Fund and Operating Subsidy RROF· 2016 •
2020
These notices shall satisfy two separate but related procedural requirements for activities to be undertaken by the
Renton Housing Authority.
REQUEST FOR RELEASE Of FUNDS
On or about September 13, 2016 the City of Renton will authorize the Renton Housing Authority to submit a request to
the US Department of Housing and Urban Development for the release of Annual Contributions Cont ra ct Number SF·
187, Amendment Number 22-N, Grant Number WA01P01150116, Capital Fund Program, and Operating Subsidy funds
under 24 CFR Part 905 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, Section 9, to undertake a project known as WAOll
Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy Proposed Activities for 2016 -2020 for the purpose of
mai ntenance, rehabilitation, and operation of public hous ing, at about $330,000 annually for capital funds and up to
$642,000 annually for operating subsidies, between 2016-2020.
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
The City of Renton has determin ed that the project will ha ve no sign i ficant Impact on the human environment.
Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Polley Act of 1969 (NEPAi is not
requ i,ed. Additional project Information ls contained in the Environmental Review Record (ERR) on file at the City of
Renton, Department of Community & Economic Development, Development Services, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,
WA 98D5, where ERR can be examined and may be examined or copied weekdays 8 A.M to S P.M.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any Individual, group, or agency may submit written comments on the ERR to the City of Renton Environmental Re view
Committee. All comments received by: September 12, 2016 will be cons i dered by the City of Renton prior to authorizing
submission of a r equest for re lease of funds. Comments should specify which Notice they are addressing.
ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION
The City of Renton certifies to HUD that the Envi ronmental Review Committee consents to accept the jurisd lct!on of the
Federal Courts If an action is brought to enforce responsibilities In relation to the environmental review process and that
these responsibilities have been satisfied. HUD's approval of the certificotion sa t i sfies its responsibilities under NEPA
and related laws and authorities and allows the City of Renton to use Program funds .
'[4] August 26, 2016
[ MARIJUANA from page 1]
for parking, requiring 2.5 parking staUs per 1,000 square
feet of store space.
But Mathias said experience in Renton and surround-
ing municipalities, as well a study conducted in Colorado
found th at recreational marijuana stores c an generate up
to I O t imes the traffic as a typical retail store, meaning an
increased need for parking.
"There seem to be more users," Mathias said. "it's not
just your average retail:'
Mathias said the city of Redmond recently determined
that recreational marijuana shops generate parking more
al.in to convenience stores than standard retail outlets
and established a parking requirement of 4 -5 stalls per
1000 square feet.
1l1ough Renton does not have a separate category in its
zoning for a convenience store, the city is r ecommending
the council adopt the same standard as Redmond for its
stores.
Another recommendation deals with the number of
shops to be allowed tu open in Renton.
~, •. ~'iJ!J DELIVERY TUBES ft 'ua. AVAILABLE
The Renton Reporter is
.. 1blished every Friday and delivery
tubes are ava ilable FREE to our
readers who live in ou r distribution
area .
The newspaper tube can be provided to you to install at your
convenience next to your mailbox receptacle or at the end of
your driveway.
Pick up your FREE tube at the Kent office, located
at 19426 68th Ave. S., Kent, WA during regula r business hours.
(Monday -Friday 8:30 a.m . to 5 p.m.)
CITY OF RF,'iTON
:'IUTIC~ ut·
PUBUC HEARI N(;
IU:NTUN CITY COU.'iCIL
:'IOTlCE IS HEREBY GIVEN
that lhc Renton City Council has
fixed the 12t.h day of Septt!mbt!r,
2016, nt 7 ()() p.m. as the dnte and
time fur a pubh\.'. hearmg to be
held in the seventh floor Council
Chambers of Renton City Hall,
1055 S. Grady Way, Rcntun,
QS057, to consider 1he follo\1,·ing:
Six Year Transpor::ation
Improvement Plan -
2017-2022 rtP
All intcn:.stcd parti..:s arc mvitcd
to Jt:cnd the pnblic hc nring n.nd
pr<:.scnt wnttcn or ural commc:1ts
rcP,arding the prnposal. Wnttcn
comments subuuncd Lo the City
Clc,k by 5:00 pm. "" the day of
t.l1c hi.:aring will be cnh::rcd m lo
the publil: hearing record.
H.c11tor1 City Hall is in com pli-
ance with lhc A,m."ncan
l>i sabiliri cs Act. and inrcrprctwc
sl.:rvu.:cs for the hc<1nng. impaired
v.;11 tc provided upon pnor
nolii.:c. Call (.l2)) 430-6510 for
additional mformali un.
Jason Sclh
Dcpuly City Clerk
r>ubh,hed 1n the Renton Rcporte-
ron August 26, 2016 . .t:16790 l S.
:'>/OTICE OF
Pl Kl.IC HEi\llt,G
RENTON II EA RI.\G
~:XAM I\Ell
R~:NTON, W,\Sllt:'I GTO"I
IJ cpartmcnl ofCommumty and
l·.conom1c Develnpment
A pabhc heanng "'11 be held hy
:he R.::nttm (k.i.nng Exarmncr Hl
:he C ,mncil Chambers oo the
licvcnlh floor or the Rcnlon Ci ty
11,11, 1055 South GrJdy Wa y.
Renton, Washington. on SL.!ptcm ,
bcr 2U. 2016 at JI.OU am tu cun-
sidcr the fo llowing p etitions:
WSOOT Pave1m:nt Rdtabilita-
t ion t,.· oisc Variance for SR 169
Cedar Riw cr Viciniry
LUA16-ll00616
Lm:ation: SR169 Cedar Kivcr
Vi ciniry Pavement Rehabilita-
tion. Desrnpb.on W.ish.tngtun
S:atc Department of Trnnsporta-
rion (WSDOT) requests a Viill-
ancc from RMC 8-7-2 G-etse
Regulations, MaxiJnurn Environ-
mental l\oisc Le,,.·cls) in order to
conduct corutru'-1iun wurk at
night in areas with residential us-
es. The construction work would
occur dilling 31 non-consecutive
nighls from Man.:h I, 2017 to
December 31. 20 18 The project
is located along Sta.le Roule 169
in both the northbound a.nd south
hound lanes, between Mile Past
22.98 to M,k l'ost 24 .84. The
portion of the pmjcct located
within the City of Renton lnnits
includes work and improvements
within the State Right uf Way
limits only. Nighttime wnrk will
mimmizc 1,;o r1gesl1u11 1mpacls to
drivers. b usinesses, school buses
and local commuh:rs <lurmg the
day, and i s Silfc r for workers and
trnvcLng pubhc.
Constrnc.t-ion cqnipmcnt usd
during night11me opcr.iltons will
im:ludc, but is not limited to
p ickup trucks, dump Lrucks, pa·,1 -
ing rn achmcs, p lanning gTindcr,
air compressors, a.~phalt saw cut-
lers. portable li!;ht plants and
generators, c.ornpact~on roller~.
flat bcdi ccmi:~t m1:u:r t:i..:.1.:ks ,
truck mounted anenuators,
'\.weeper,;, s Lriper remover, and
stnpc gnndcrs. i\uisc level~ rc-
sultm!'.!, from th e project ·s con-
struction aclivit1e."i will gener.ilc
peak noise levels of 62 to 85
d.BA as perceived at 50 l(ct from
lflc \\.'Sl>OT properly lim:.
\\.'hen feasible. temporary noise
shields will be placed around
i:unstruellon cqu 1pmcn1. All '-C ·
hides shalJ be equipped with nm-
www.rentonreporter.com
Despite the state liquor and Cannabis Board chang-
ing Rentun's allocation of stores from three tu six, fur
example, the city is recommending no change to Renton's
policy limiTi..ng the number of stores in the city t o five.
According to Senior Planner Angie Mathias, the city
arrived at its number in September 2015 after the LCB
notified renton that due to changes in the medical law,
they wouJd be accepting new license applications for
retail stores and would not be limiting the number o f
licensed stores per c ity. After that, the council adopted an
interim zoning regulation limiting Re.nton's total number
of st ores to five, which .Mathias said was the total number
of rec shops plus the two medical collectives operating in
the uty.
"Bringing tho.,c two systems together should result in
the demand fo r both recreat ional and medical marijuana
being met Ly five stores," reads a memo sent to members
of the planning commission this summer.
Another change in the state law deals with the sensitive
use buffer zones surrounding the stores. Originally. the
state mandated a 1,000-foot barrier between the shops
and "sensitive uses" such as schools, playgrounds, parks,
libraries, public transit centers, child care centers, recre
atiun centers and arcades.
Last year's changes to law allow cities t he option of re-
ducing those buffers to as low as 100 feet from park.s, rec
centers, child care centers, public transit facilities and ar-
cades. However, despite the option to reduce the buffers ,
city staff has recommended keeping the buffers at their
current levels. According tu the memo, other j urisdic-
tions have reduced the buffers in order to provide more
locations in the city for retail stores, but the staff does not
believe that is an issue in Renton.
following testimony at a public hearing from stor e
owners about the difficulty in finding a good location,
however, :-..1athias said th e commission is c onsidering it s
own recommendation to council to reduce some of the
buffers.
Finally, the legislature also made changes on the medi-
cal side to outlaw collective gardens, hut instead wiU
allow cooperatives o f up to four patients, each with up 10
15 p lants, to be able tu combine their growing efforts at
a single location. That would allow up to 60 plants to be
grown at a single residential home.
But staff has concerns a bout the cooperatives, mainly
because the prior laws were "fairly easily mani pulated;'
which led to their ban by the city council.
"We worry about what loopholes are unanticipated
with this;· Mathias sai d.
She also said the city has concerns regarding uuttlour
grows, due to the state requirement for an eight -foot,
sight-obscuring fence, which is two feet higher than
fences allowed in the city without a variance.
1l1e city also feels that because there arc there ways for
pat ients to get marijuana besides growing, the coopera
lives, which arc labeled "new and untested" in the memo,
should not be al lowed.
"You can pur chase it on )'Olli own or grow up to 15
plants," Mathias said.
The Planning Commission will make their recom
mcndations to the council's planning and development
committee in early September and the final council is
expected to make their decision later that month.
Reach editor Brian Beckley at 425-336-4959.
[ SUSPECT from page 1] suspects were not located. evidence for processing.
The suspect described as a His-
panic male, 16 17 years of age, with
black hair and was last seen wearing
a tank top.
Sixth Place. A K9 track was attempt-
ed, but despite what are described
as "exhausting efforts by all;' the
"!be victim identified I he vehicle as
the same the suspects were in when
thq threatened him with a gun.
1l1e suspect vehicle was taken into
PUBLIC NOTICES
bicnl sensih'-'C backup warrung
d evices.
Legal dcscnptions of the tiles
noted above are on file in the
City Clerk's Office, Seventh
Floor, Ctty I fa.II, Rcrilon. All in-
1crcstcd persons arc in,..·lted to be
p resent at the Pubh~ Hcai iu~ to
ex.press their npinion.,;. Questions
:shuuld be directed to the Hearing
Examiner at 425 430.6515 .
Published in the Renton Rcp~mcr
oaAugusl 26, 2016 #1679033
CITY OF RUHON
Dcranment nfC'nmrn unity and
El'onomic Dc .... cloomcut
:'iOTIC.t: OF I YfF.NT
TO rU:QL ~ST RE LEASK
OF FU!'iDS FOR
SUNSET TJ::RR\CE
REDEV[LOP~IENT
DAlbOI· 'l(Jl'ICE
August 26, 2016
NAME OF RfoSPONSIHLE
EN'l l l'Y: City orncnton
L~ND USE 'lt:MBER:
LUA I6--0006JO, ECF
ADDRESS . Envuorum:otal
l{cvicw ('ommitcc
Care of: Ocpa.rtmcnt of Conunu·
ni ty & Fcr.no m1c Dt:vclopml:nt,
Cum:nt Plaruung, I 055 South
r.rady WA. Renton, WA 9K055
STAff CONTACT
Vanessa Dolbee, 425-430-7200
PROJFCT !\AMF·
Rcnlon 1 lousmg Autlnmty C J.pi-
t::il Fund and Operating Suhliidy
RROr' 2016 202 0 T/resl! nuti,·-
es shall Wlll\/y two fepa rate hul
related procedural rel/uiremenb
for Rcn\1itfr...J ro /Je undl!nalun by
the Renton llou!fing Aut hiJrity.
l!EQLiEST FOR R~:t.l:ASF.
OF FU;',US Un or about Sep -
tember 13, 20 16 the Citv of Ren-
ton will auL1unzi: L11~ Renton
I Jo u.sing A uthonty to ~uhmll a
request to lhe US Ucpartm~nt of
llousing and L rhan Dcvelopmcnl
fo r the rc lca.si: of Annual (ontri-
butions Contract Number
Sf-187, Arncndment ~wnbcr
22-X Grant :'lumber
Wi\01P011501 16, Capital Fund
Program, and Opcr:lllng Subsidy
fonds under 24 CFR Pm 905 of
the Uniled. St.ates Hu~ing Act of
1937, Section 9, to ur.de:t:ike a
project known a!S WA.011 Rcuton
Housing Authoriiy C.apital Fun d
,nd OpcrJtrng Sub,rdy Proposed
Activities for 20 t 6 2020 for the
p?JrJOSC.: uf mainlcna.nec, rchabil i-
iarion, nnd o peration of puhlic
huusmg, at abo ut S3JO,OOO annu.
ally for capital fundc. and up to
SM2.0<JO annually for opcratmg
subsidies, between )016-)0W
HNDl:-iG OF NO SIG:'l tFI-
CA:'IT L~U'i\CT The Cil)' of
Renton has detcnnined that the
projecl will have no signifh:ant
impact on the human i:nviron-
mcnl. rhcrdOrc. an Envi1on-
mcntal Impact Statement under
lhc National Envuonmental l'oh-
cy Act of 1969 (Nl'PA) is nol re-
4u1rl:d.. A(.]tl1t11.mal prOJCt.:t mfor.
mat ion is contained in the Envi-
rururn.:nL.:tl Review Record (.!:::KR)
nn file m lhc City of Rl:nlon. De-
partm en t of Community & Eco~
cmmic oe .... elopmcnt, Develop-
ment Serv1t.:cs, 1055 South Grad.y
\Vay. Renton, WA 9R05, where
ERR L:an be examml·d a11d. may
be c.urnincd o r Cl>picd weekdays
~AMloSP M
PUKLIC CUMMDTS Any
indivt dunl. gtOlJP, or agency may
submit written comments on the
ERR lo lhc Cily of Ren1on F nvi·
rnnmenlal Review Committee.
All cumments received by:
September 12. 20 16 wi ll he con-
~akrcd by lhc City of Rcalon
prior to authorizing submission
of a requcsr for release of ,und.".
Cummenl.:i should. ~pc..:1 r; wlm:h
Notice 1hey are addressing.
ENVIRONME!'iTAL
CJ::RT lflCATION The Cuy of
Renton certifies to IIUD that the
Emironrncntal Review Commit -
tee const:nts to acct:pt tlil! Juns+
diction of the Federal Courts if
an action is brought tu cofurl.'.C
responsibilities in relation to the
cnvironmcutal n:vi~w pwccss
and that these rcspomibillries
have been satisfied. H L"D's ap-
proval o f tht: certilkatiun satis·
tics its responsibilities u.,idcr
NEPA and rdat1.:d laws and au-
thorities and allows the Cily of
Renton to use Program funds
OBJE.CTIO"IS TO RELEASE
OF Ftl:'IDS l!l:D will accept
objections to ils release of fund
and lhc City of Renton ·s ecniE-
i:atton fo r a pcno<l or fifteen days
fnllowmg lhc anticipated submis-
sion datc or \ti acwal receipt of
the request (whichever is later)
only if \hey arc on on e of the fol-
lowing bases: (a) the ccrti.licat1on
w:L<. not ex.ecutcd by th~ Certify~
mg Officer of lhc C ity of Renton;
(b) the City of Renton ha..-i onnt-
ted a step or fn led lo m-\ke n dc-
cis1un or find.mg r...:~utrcd by
ilLn regulations at 24 CFR pan
58, (cl the grant recipient er o:h-
e r participants m the (.kvclup·
merit process huve commincd
ft.;.mis, inc~ed costs or WJdcrtak-
cn activities not authcrizcd. bv 24
CFR !'art 58 before approval ·of a
release of funds by l!UD; or (d)
auotbcr Federal a~ci:cy acting
pursuant to 40 CFR Part 1504
has s ubmitted a written fin ding
that Lbc proJCi.:l i!i wThaltsfaetory
from the standpoint of envi ron
mcnlal quality. Objcchons must
he prepared and submilted m ac-
cordane-c Wl1h the required pro-
cccJurcs (24 Cr'R Pail 58, Sec.
5~ 76) and ,hall he addressed to
llUlJ at Scanle Regional Offic e,
Seattle FcLlcra l Onicc Building,
Otlicc of Public llousing, 909
First Avenue, Su.itc 360, Seattle,
WA 98104-l OCO . Po1entiol ob-
jectors should contact JIUD to
verify the actual la.'.t day of the
ob_1cct10a p<:no<.l
Rt"poruihlc Entity C ertifyin g
omccr
City or R'-'lllon Environmental
Rci.icw Commincc (FRC)
Dale ur Decision:
August 22, 2016
D:.ite ur J-Jublicalion: August 2 6,
2016 in the Renton Reporter.
il l 67g09J .
To place a Legal Notice,
please c a ll 253-234-3506
or e-mail
legals@reporternewspapers.com
DEPARTMENT OF COMMU, ... , ;y
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT entOil®
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT
£RC MEETING DATE:
Project Name:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Owner:
Project Summary:
STAFF
RECOMMENDA T/ON:
September 19, 2016
Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy RROF-2016 -2020
LUA16 -000630, ECF
Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager
Re nton Housing Authority; 2900 NE 101h St; renton, WA 98056
The applicant, the Renton Housing Authority (RHA), is requesting National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review for their proposed Capital Fund and Operating
Subsidy activities for 2016 through 2020. All activ iti es rece iving Capital Fund Grants
and Operating Subsidies from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) are required to undergo review pursuant to the NEPA, consistent
with HUD's rules (24 CFR Part 58). The City of Renton is the NEPA Responsible Entity
(RE) for RHA proposals. NEPA review for RHA's proposed activities is being
accomplished by a single programmatic EA review for the period 2016 to 2020 and is
applicab le to all affe cted properties in the Renton Housing Authority's portfolio. The
Renton Housing Authority manages eight subsidized properties that are available to
low income households or low-income senior or disabled households. Exempt and
non-exempt activiti es are proposed. Activities include: Public Housing Authority-wide
administration, operations, technical assistance, training, fees and costs, and delivery
of services such as summer youth programs; Low Income Public Hou sing Authority-
w ide maintenance including appliance replacement, non-dwelling equipment and
tools; Plans and designs of the Sunset Terrace Replacement Units (prior NEPA
clearance in 2011); and maintenance, Rehabilitation, and Public Facility
Improvements at H illcrest Terrace, Evergreen Terrace, and Cole Manor.
Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue
Request to Release Funds (RROF).
The final step in the NEPA process is for the ERC to issue the Request to Release Funds (RROF). This is a certification
that the City has completed the NEPA process and will be sent to the United States Department of Housing and
Urban Development (HUD) with a number of attachments documenting that publ ic notice has been given. Notice
of the City's intent to Request the Release of Fund s was issued on April 22, 2016, with publication and distributi on
by August 26, 2016.
Once the RROF i s issued and sent to HUD, the Renton Housing Authority may begin their application process with
HUD to redevelop Sunset Terrace.
ERC Report -RROF 9 19 16
I
I
I
I
I
Conditions For Approval of Renton Housing Authority Capital
Fund and Operating Subsidy Proposed Activities for 2016 -2020
The following mitigating conditions of approval for the Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and
Operating Subsidy Proposed Activities for 2016 -2020 were identified in the Environmental Assessment.
1 Law, Authority, or Factor -
Mitigation Measure
Clean Air Comply with Puget Sound Clean Air Agency rules on As_l}__t~tos
Con L1 ol St<1ndJ Ids . Responsible Party: Contractors.
The City shall require all construction contractors to implement
air quality control plans for construction activities in the project
area. The air quality control plans should include best
management practices to control fugitive dust and odors
emitted by diesel construction equ ipment.
The following BMPs wi ll be used to control fugitive dust.
• Use water sprays or other non -toxic dust control methods
an unpaved roadways.
• Minimize veh icle speed w hil e trave ling on unpaved
surfaces.
• Prevent trackout of mud onto public streets .
• Cover soil piles when practica l.
Minimize work during periods of high winds when practical.
The following mitigation measures will be used to minimize air
quality and odor issues caused by ta i lpipe emissions.
• Maintain the engines of constructio n equipment according
to manufacturers' spec1ficat 1ons.
• Min i mize idling of equipment w hil e the equipment is not in
use.
Responsible Party: City of Renton and Contractors.
·--II Contamination & Toxic Substances No impacts are anticipated, but if evidence of potential
11
I contami na t ion is identified during project planning or execution,
procedures should be implemented for sampling and analysis to
evaluate the suspect material and provide for appropriate
handling and disposal of the material to ensure protection of
' human health and the environment. Responsible Party, '
: Contractors. -----------------1----------------------------
Historic Preservation No impacts to archaeological resources are anticipated. In the
event that ground disturbing or other activities do resu It in the
inadvertent discovery of archaeological deposits, work should be
1
halted in the immediate area and contact made with DAHP~in ;
'[ Olympia. Work should be halted until such time as further
investigation and appropriate consultation is concluded. In the
1
11 Law, Authority, or Factor Mitigation Measure I
I
I -·
i unlikely event of the inadvertent discovery of human remains,
work s hould be immediately ha lted in the area, the discovery
covered and secured against further d is turbance, and contact
effected with law enforcement personnel. Responsible Party,
I Contractors.
--
Endangered Species, Surface Water, A. Use pervious materials to replace sidewalks to offset any
and Aquifer Protection Zones added impervious areas for public facility or site improvements
(e.g. solid w aste enclosures or ADA improvements), to achieve
no-net-increase in site impervious areas. Alternatively,
i mplement best management practices that achieve low impact
development objectives and the surface water design manual
standards.
B. Reroute public facility improvements (e.g. replacement
sidewalks) to retain trees. Alternatively replant trees if tree
remova l is necessary consistent with City standards (RMC 4-4-
130).
C. Comply with City surface water design manual as appropriate.
Responsible Party: Renton Housing Authority.
---··•
Coastal Zone Management Act Apply as appropriate for a permit or cert ificat ion for Stat e water
qual ity requirements if exceedi ng state thresholds. Comply with
City suriace water design manual as appropriate under any I
circumstance. Responsible Party: Renton Housing Authority.
·-··---· ·--
Noise Abatement and Control At Cole Manor seek the highest sou nd tran smission class rated
siding that meets capital facility needs and resources .
Responsible Party: Renton Housing Authority. (See
Environme ntal Assessment Attachme nt B for links to guidance
documents.)
2
U.S. Department \-Aousing and Urban
Development
451 Seventh Street, SW
Washington, DC 20410
www.hud .gov
espanol.hud.gov
Environmental Assessment
Determinations and Compliance Findings for HUD-assisted Projects
24 CFR Part 58
Project Information
Project Name: WA011 Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy Proposed
Act ivities for 2016 -2020
Responsible Entity: City of Renton
Grant Recipient (if different than Responsible Entity}: Renton Hous ing Authority
State/Local Identifier: WA011
Preparer: Lisa Grueter, Manager, BERK Consulting
Certifying Officer Name and Title: Mayor Denis Law and designee the Environmental Review
Committee
Grant Recipient (if different than Responsible Entity}: Renton Housing Authority
Consultant (if applicable): BERK Consulting, with Cultural Resource Consultants LLC, Landau Associates,
and Weinman Consulting LLC
Direct Comments to:
Roca le Timmons
City of Renton -Current Planning
Senior Planner
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
Tel: (425} 430-7219
Fax: (425} 430-7300
rt immo ns@ r entonwa.gov
')
Project Location:
See Exhibit 1 for physical locations. Sites are listed below:
• Hillcrest Terrace 1442 Hillcrest Lane NE
• Evergreen Terrace 3027 NE 15th
• Cole Manor 2811 NE 4TH
• Sunset Terrace: generally bounded by Sunset Lane NE and Glenwood Avenue NE on the north,
NE 10th Street on the east, NE Sunset Boulevard (State Route [SR] 900) on the south, and
Edmonds Avenue NE on the west
• Glennwood Townhomes 1141 & 1147 Glennwood Avenue
• Kirkland Townhomes 1508 Kirkland Ave NE
• Golden Pines Apartments 2901 NE 10th
• Cedar River Terrace 51 Burnett Street
·._)
Exhibit 1. Renton Housing Authority Properties under Evaluation
Henton Hous i ng Authority: Subsid i zed Properties
' -----·-··--~-------------------~--------------·----~------·-----·
Source : King County, Citv of Renton, BERK Consu lt i ng 2016
)
Description of the Proposed Project [24 CFR 50.12 & 58.32; 40 CFR 1508.25]:
The proposal consists of Renton Housing Authority's (RHA's) proposed Capital Fund and Operating
Subsidy activities for 2016-2020. Activities include:
• Public Housing Authority-wide administration, operations, technical assistance, training, fees
and costs, and delivery of services such as summer youth programs.
• Low Income Public Housing Authority-wide maintenance including appliance replacement, non-
dwelling equipment and tools.
• Plans and designs of the Sunset Terrace Replacement Units (prior NEPA clearance in 2011).
• Maintenance, Rehabilitation, and Public Facility Improvements at Hillcrest Terrace, Evergreen
Terrace, and Cole Manor.
See Attachment A Project Description for details.
Statement of Purpose and Need for the Proposal [40 CFR 1508 .9(b)J:
The purpose and need for the proposal is the proper operation and adm inistration of the Renton
Housing Authority and its ongoing maintenance of low income public housing units and properties, as
,~ ...... 11 ................... ~+ ... -ai ....... i--'""' ........... ,...,.... .. : ........................ -,....,,..,1 .......... ,.., ........ _...,,.. , ........... "",..;.,..J ............ + ....
\I VCII a..>,.H.UII \.101111115 OIIU c:yu 1p111c:11\., OIIU t,11v51a111~ IVI IC.;)IUC:111..:),
The rehabilitation and site improvements will increase the livability and accessibility of the dwelling
units and sites by modernizing fixtures, removing asbestos containing materials, and removing ADA
barriers including replacing sidewalks and adding ramps and other improvements.
Existing Conditions and Trends [24 CFR 58.40(a)]:
Without the project, dwellings and site improvements would con tinue to age and reach obsolescence,
and sites would continue to be less convenient or safe to navigate for residents and pedestrians in the
absence of sid ewalk replacements or accessibility improvements.
Funding Information
RHA's Grant r~urnber is WA 19PO 1150116. Exhibit 2 and Exhibit 3 identify the capital fund grant and
operating subsidy over the 2016-2020 period.
______ Ex_h_i_bit 2. Capital Fund Gra._n_t _____ ~
r ·Fiscal Year ! Grant
:_WA01P011501-16 (FY 2016)_________ : $3?~,Q~7 _
! Estima ted 2017 · $330,000 ,
I ~:::::::: ~~~: ·------·---··---·----·-·---~ _1 ;~~~:~~ITT
i. Es!i~at~d 2020 ......... _ L_?~?.o!g~tl
Source: US HUD District 10, Renton Housing Authority 2016
' :. _}
Exhibit 3. Operating Subsidy
I Fiscal Year
I
I Subsidy
2016 I $641,696
Estimate based on 2016 LIPH inventory 2017 I $600,000
Estimate based on 2016 LIPH inventory 2018 I $600,000
Estimate based ?n 2q16 LIPH inventory 2019 I $600,000
Estimate based on 2016 LIPH inventory 2020 i $600,000
Source: US HUD District 10, Renton Housing Authority 2016
Estimated Total HUD Funded Amount:
See Exhibit 2 and Exhibit 3.
Estimated Total Project Cost (HUD and non-HUD funds) [24 CFR 58.32{d)]:
No other fu nds are included except HUD funds. For the total project cost see Exhibits 1 and 2.
Compliance with 24 CFR 50.4, 58.5, and 58.6 Laws and Authorities
Record below the compliance or conformance determinations for each statute, executive order, or
regulation. Provide credible, traceable, and supportive source documentation for each authority. Where
applicable, complete the necessary reviews or consultations and obtain or note applicable permits of
approvals. Clearly note citations, dates/names/titles of contacts, and page references. Attach additional
documentation as appropriate.
Compliance Factors: Statutes, A re formal Compliance determinations
Executive Orders, and compliance
Regulations listed at 24 CFR steps or
§58.5 and §58.6 mitigation
required?
STATUTES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, AND REGULATIONS LISTED AT 24 CFR 50.4 and 58.6
Airport Hazards Yes No No sites are in the Runway Protection Zone or
D [SJ Accident Potential Zone.
24 CFR Part 51 Subpart D The Cedar River Terrace site is located outside
the area where height restrictions apply per FAR
Part 77 of Renton Municipal Airport. It is located
in the Traffic Pattern Zone (6); future
development is subject to review and potential
conditions regarding density, notice on titles,
and other provisions. No new units or
development are proposed on the subject site.
See RMC 4-3-020 Airport Related Height and
Use Restrictions. See worksheet in Attachment
)
Compliance Factors: Statutes, Are formal Compliance determinations
Executive Orders, and compliance
Regulations listed at 24 CFR steps or
§58.5 and §58.6 mitigation
required?
B, RMC 4-3 -020 Airport Related Height And Use
Restrictions, and detailed height map Renton
Municigal Airgort Building Height Restrictions.
Coastal Barrier Resources Yes No Not applicable. Renton is not located on the
D ~ marine coast.
Coastal Barrier Resources Act, as
amended by the Coastal Barrier
Improvement Act of 1990 [16
use 35011 I The Cedar River Terrace site is located in the
I r-1"\l"""I . ·---Cl --J .-•-~~-. 1.-.. .&. ·---.,:.1..i __ l __ .1.: ___ ---
1
.::,uu-yt::dl I IUUU!Jldll I uu l I IU LI lllLdl dLllUI I:> d IC:
proposed; physical activities are limited to
II Flood Insurance
\\ Flood Disaster Protection Act of
Yes No
1973 and National Flood maintenance. See worksheet in Attachment B
Insurance Reform Act of 1994 [42 and map illustrating Zo n e X floodr1lain bo undarv
use 4001-4128 and 42 use {500 year floodplain). I
5154a]
STATUTES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, AND REGULATIONS LISTED AT 24 CFR 50.4 & 58.5
Clean Air Yes No The Puget Sound region is considered a
~ D maintenance a rea, and is not designated a non-
Clean Air Act, as amended, attainment area. City: of Renton regulations
particularly section 176(c) & (d); regarding construction apply and address dust
40 CFR Parts 6, 51, 93 and other matters; additional best management
practices are recommended to control dust. No
operational increases in traffic trips a re
I anticipated as no dwellings are added. Puget
Sound C!ean .Air .Agency ru!e s on Asb e stos
I Control Standards apply.
I Coastal Zone Management Yes No The project is within the Washington coastal
I ~ D zone management area. The City of Renton
Coastal Zone Management Act, submitted its request for consistency
sections 307(c) & (d) determination to the Washington State I
Department of Ecology (Ecology). See I
Attachment C Department of Ecology
determination of consistency letter to City of
Renton.
Contamination and Toxic Yes No This review found no evidence of known or
Substances ~ D suspected contamination at any of the three
properties. Therefore, no additional I
I 24 CFR Part 50.3(i) & 58.S(i)(2) investigation is warranted based on the project I
. _} ;
'_}
Compliance Factors: Statutes, Are formal Compliance determinations
Executi ve Orders, and compliance
Regulations listed at 24 CFR steps or
§58.5 and §58.6 mitigation
required?
as defined, and the information reviewed.
However, if evidence of potentia l co ntam ination
is identified during project planning or
execution, procedures should be implemented
for sampling and analysis to evaluate the
suspect material and provide for appropriate
handling and disposal of the material to ensure
protection of human health and the
environment. See Attachment B including EDR
report exce rpts. Full EDR reports for the three
sites where exterior site alterations are
proposed (Hillcrest Terrace , Evergreen Terrace, I
I and Cole Manor) are available w ith the
Environmental Review Record.
Endangered Species Yes No The capital and operating subsidy projects
~ D considered in 2016 for Hillcrest Terrace,
Endangered Species Act of 1973, Evergreen Terrace, and Cole Manor are not
particularly section 7; 50 CFR a nticipated to result in increased runoff beyond
Part 402 current conditions and would not have the
potential to change pollutant loading relative to
current conditions due to: application of surface
water and aquifer protection standards in the
Renton Municipal Code, no net increase in
impervious area, and no new impervious
surfaces access ible to vehicula r traffic.
Therefore no effect to listed fish species is
anticipated. Based on a re view of the
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's
Priority Habitats and Species database no listed
wi ldlife species or critical habitat are found on
the subject sites.
Explosive and Flammable Ye s No There are no above ground storage tanks w ithin
Hazards D ~ 1 mile of the sites where rehabilitation is
proposed. See Attachment B including EDR
24 CFR Part 51 Subpart C report excerpts. Full EDR reports for the three
sites where exterior site alterations are
proposed (Hillcrest Terrace, Evergreen Terrace,
I
and Cole Manor) are available with the
Environmental Review Record.
Compliance Factors: Statutes,
Executive Orders, and
Regulations listed at 24 CFR
§58.5 and §58.6
Farmlands Protection
Farmland Protection Policy Act of
1981, particularly sections
1504(b) and 1541; 7 CFR Part 658
Floodplain Management
Executive Order 11988,
particularly section 2(a); 24 CFR
Part 55 I 11!-.a.--!-n-------·-.a.!--ii r,1:-,~1_11 II,!"! ,;:)tel V<;l~IUI I
National Historic Preservation
Act of 1966, particularly sections
106 and 110; 36 CFR Part 800
Are formal
compliance
steps or
mitigation
required?
Yes No
D [2J
Yes No
D [2J
,,__ 11.1-
1 e.::, l'iU
)
Compliance determinations
Not applicable. Sites are already developed for
urban use. See Attachment B.
The Cedar River Terrace site is located in the
500-year floodplain but no critical actions are
proposed. See worksheet in Attachment Band
map illustrating Zone X floodQ la in boundar1'.
(500 year floodplain).
TL-___ ; __ .., ... :II --.._ .-U,... ... .&. --·· -----:-•• -1,.
I I It: !,JI UJt:1...l WI ii I IUl Cl I lt:l...l a11y !JI t:v1uu;:,1y
recorded historic properties. See Attachment D.
None of the proposed activities at Cole Manor
and Hillcrest Terrace, nor the addition of the
garbage recycling station at Hillcrest in March
2016, will affect aboveground historic
properties. The Evergreen Terrace facility, built
I
in 1968, was identified by DAHP as over 45 years .
in age and in need of review at the EZ -2 level. A
short report form was provided to DAHP, and
DAHP found that no historic properties will be
affected by the current project as proposed in
correspondence dated August 4, 2016.
)
Compliance Factors: Statutes, Are formal Compliance determinations
Exe cutive Orders, and compliance
Regulations listed at 24 CFR steps or
§58.5 and §58.6 mitigation
required?
Noise Abatement and Control Yes No Evergreen Terrace and Cole Manor are within
[Z] D 1,000 feet of principal arterials ..
Noise Control Act of 1972, as
amended by the Quiet Evergreen Terrace at its closest point is about
Communities Act of 1978; 24 CFR 285 feet from the SR 900 centerline, and Cole
Part 51 Subpart B Manor is about 88 feet from the NE 3rd Street
centerline west of Jefferson Avenue NE. I
I
Using HU D's online tool, noise levels are !
acceptable for Evergreen Terrace (not exceeding
65 db). No mitigation is needed.
Cole Manor is above 65 dB but not exceeding 70
dB, considered normally unacceptable for new
construction; attenuation is encouraged for
modernization. New construction of dwellings is
not proposed.
Since new concrete board siding is proposed
between the eaves and current brick fai;:ade, it is
recommended that the h ighest sound
transmission class (STC) rated board that meets
the capital program needs and resources be
applied.
Sole Source Aquifers Yes No Cole Manor is located in the Cedar Valley sole
[Z] D source aquifer; see C e dar V alley 2 map. The
Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, project is not likely to affect Sole Source Aquifer
as amended, particularly section quality. Sizes of residential structures will stay
1424 (e); 40 CFR Part 149 the same. Sizes of public facilities may slightly I
expand impervious area (e.g. ADA i
improvements). It is anticipated that sidewalk
replacements will be pervious leading to no-net-
increase in impervious area. Improvements are ' ' subject to the City's aquifer protection '
reg ulations and surface water desi gn manual,
consist of non-pollutant g enerating surfaces,
and are in locations served by public water,
sewer, and storm drainage systems.
Wetlands Protection Yes No There are no known wetlands on subject
D ~ properties. See Attachment Band Wet lands and
Executive Order 11 99 0, Wate r Classifications map.
I i
·')
Compliance Factors: Statutes,
Executive Orders, and
Regulations listed at 24 CFR
§58.5 and §58.6
particularly sections 2 and 5
Wild and Scenic Rivers
Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of
1968, particularly section 7(b)
and (c)
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE
Environmental Justice I
\I F.x eC1JtivP. Order 12898
II . . -
Are formal
compliance
steps or
mitigation
required?
Yes No
D ~
Yes No
)
Compliance determinations
None of the project sites are within proximity of
a Wild and Scenic River, based on a review of
National Park Service information for
Was hington Sta te.
I Proposed rehabiHtation will improve the quality
of the indoor environment tor residents (e.g.
removal of asbestos containing material).. .:ind
will also improve access for elderly and disabled
___ ;...J __ ..__ , __ l'tn/\ : ............. --..·------' 111,1 __ ..J _____ _
1e:,1ue11D 1e.5. MUM 111q.J1uve111t::1n:,1. l'IU dUVt::1:,t::
envi ronmental impacts are anticipated.
Environmental Assessment Factors [24 CFR 58.40; Ref. 40 CFR 1508.8 &1508.27] Recorded below is the
qualitative and quantitative significance of the effects of the propos al on the character, features and
resources of the project area. Each factor has been evaluated and documented, as appropriate and i n
proportion to its relevance to the proposed action. Verifiable source documentation has been provided
and described in support of each determination, as appropriate. Credible, traceable and supportive
source documentation for each authority has been provided. Where applicable, the necessary reviews
or consultations have been completed and applicable permits of approvals have been obtained or
noted. Citations, dates/names/titles of contacts, and page references are clear. Additional
documentation is attached, as appropriate. All conditions, attenuation or mitigation measures have
been clearly identified.
Impact Codes : Use an impact code from the following list to make the determination of impact for each
factor.
(1) Minor beneficial impact
(2} No impact anticipated
(3) Minor Adverse Impact -May require mitigation
(4) Significant or potentially significant impact requiring avoidance or modification which may require
an Environmental Impact Statement
I Environmental Impact
I Assessment Factor Code Impact Evaluation
LAND DEVELOPMENT
Conforma nee with 2 here w ill be no change in use of t he subject sites; all are zoned
I
I
\J I .J ' .
Plans/ Compatible for residential or mixed use/ residential-commercial purposes.
Land Use and Zoning/ • Hillcrest Terrace 1442 Hillcrest Lane NE: R-14
Scale and Urban • Evergreen Terrace 3027 NE 15th: Center Village
Design • Cole Manor 2811 NE 4TH: RM -F
• Sunset Terrace, SR 900: Center Village
I • Cedar River Terrace 51 Burnett Street: Center Downtown
• Glennwood Townhomes 1141 & 1147 Glennwood
Avenue: R-14
• Golden Pines Apartments 2901 NE 10th: Center Village
• Kirkland Townhomes 1508 Kirkland Ave NE: R-14
Proposed capital projects would be compatible with the scale
land pattern of existing land use.
Soil Suitability/ Slope/ !Some areas of steep slopes are mapped on the Hillcrest Terrace
Erosion/ Drainage/ 2 land Evergreen Terrace sites. Moderate landslides are mapped in
Storm Water Runoff ~he Evergreen Terrace area. Stormwater systems serve all sites I
under review. See maps: Erosion Hazard, Landslide Hazard, Steep I
~ and Storm Water. Where site disturbance is proposed for
lADA improvements, sidewalk replacements, and similar exterior
!activities, the application of City regulations for critical areas.
[grading and erosion control, stormwater, landscaping, and
related standards in Renton Municipal code Title IV will add ress
lany potential impacts. {See list under Mitigation Measures and
:Conditions below.)
Hazards and 3 !See Cont ami nation and Toxic Substances and Noise Abatement
Nuisances labove. With proposed mitigation, no impacts are anticipated.
including Site Safety
and Noise
Energy Consumption 1 '~ome maintenance and rehabilitation includes implementation
IOf energy saving light bulbs.
i' Environmental Impact I
I
i
Assessment Factor Code Impact Evaluation I
SOCIOECONOMIC I
Employment and 2 No implementation of economic uses and no displacement of
Income Patterns businesses would occur.
Demographic 2 Units will be rehab i litated when vacated and made ready for i
Character Changes, new tenants. No displacement would occur.
I
i
Displacement
Environmental Impact
A ssessment Factor Code Impact Evaluation
COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES I
I
Educational and 2 No facilities of this type wi ll be added or d ispla ced.
Cu ltural Facilities
')
I !
I
Commercial Facilities 2 No facilities of this type will be added or displaced.
Health Care and Social 1 Summer youth programs are proposed for funding.
Services
Solid Waste Disposal/ 2 IAny construction will follow proper solid waste disposal per City
Recycling codes (RMC 8-1). At Hillcrest Terrace and Cole Manor, collection
and storage of solid waste will be more efficient.
Waste Water/ 2 IAII sites are served by sewers; no change in numbers of dwelling
Sanitary Sewers units is proposed and no impacts are anticipated.
iSee: Wastewater.
Water Supply 2 !All sites are served by the City's water system; no change in
numbers of dwelling units is proposed and no impacts are
anticipated . See: Drinking Water .
Public Safety -Police, 2 All sites are served by the City's police and fire departments; no
Fire and Emergency change in numbers of dwelling units is proposed and no impacts
Medical are anticipated. See: EJre Station Response Areas, and Police
!Department Patrol Areas .
,c-:+ ........ -... ----·--i L.. ••• i.... ... n ...................... n ........ ,~,.. ,.. ..... +--"' ...... ,..L... ............. ,... ; .... t'' LC::::J ell C ::.cl vcu uy ll IC I\C:::I ILUJ I r'OI r,.:, :::iy.:JLCI 11, 1'4U \..I IOI 15c: 111
jnumbers of dwelling units is proposed and no impacts are
r1 n-..-•·-'"'---r----
11 r'dl K:., Vf)t:11 .:>fJdLt:
I and Recreation
anticipated. It shou ld be noted that a central park is to be added
at Sunset Terrace , expanding and consolidating park area in the
!Vicinity. See: Renton Trai ls and Bikewats Guide including parks .
Transportation and 1 !Sites are served by local and state roads (see Arterials}; no
Accessibility dwellings are added and no increases in daily traffic are
anticipated. Onsite ADA and sidewalk improvements w ill
I improve accessibility by the disabled and elderly.
Environmental Impact
Assessment Factor Code Impact Evaluation
NATURAL FEATURES
Unique Natural I 2 ~here are no onsite unique natural features. Water resources
Features, I will be protected by the nature of the prnposais {e.g. replacing
I
Water Resources !sidewalks with pervious materials) and application of City
:.tormwater requirements where applicable .
Vegetation, Wildlife 2 ::>ee endangered species above.
Other Factors 2 None.
I
I
Additional Studies Performed:
Li st of Attachments:
A. Project Description
B. Checklists Regarding 24 CFR 50.4, 58.5, and 58.6 Laws and Authorities
,,..
·) (_)
C. Department of Ecology Coastal Zone Management Determination of Consistency Letter
D. Cultural Resources Assessment for the Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capital Facility Program,
Renton, King County, W A, Technical Memo, A ugust 4, 2016, including Department of
Archaeology and Historic Preservation Letter, No Historic Properties Affected, August 4, 2016
Field Inspection (Date and completed by):
No field investigation was conducted. Sites we re reviewed by aerial photos in Google Earth.
List of Sources, Agencies and Persons Consulted [40 CFR 1508.9(b)]:
Age ncies:
Washington Department of Ecology, Coastal Zone Management (see Attachment C)
Washington Depa rtment of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (see Attachment D)
Duwamish Tribe (see Attachment D)
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (see Attachment D)
Snoqualmie Indian Tribe (see Attachment D)
Renton Ho using Authority, M ark Gropper, Sean McCarty
Schemata, Grace Kim, Guy Thomsen
Sources and Additional Resources Used:
See Attachment B regarding sources addressing 24 CFR 50.4, 58.5, and 58.6 Laws and Authorities.
City of Renton Map Gallery
Ai r port Area Elevat ions -South
Aquife r Protection
Arterials
Drinking Water
Erosion Hazard
Fire Station Res ponse Areas
Flood Haza rd
Landslide Haza rd
Pol ice Dep artment Pa trol Areas
Re nton Trails and Bikeways Guide
Steep Slopes
Storm Water
Wastewater
Wetlands and Water Classifications
Zoning
Environmental Protectton 11gency: Sole Source Aq uife r Maps : Ceda r Va ll ey 2
King County 1Map: http://www.kingcounty.gov/servic es/gis/Maps/im ap .aspx
WSDO T -Freight and Goods: http://wsdot.maps.arcgis.com/home/index.htm l
WSDOT Community Planning Portal: http://wsdot.maps .arcgis .com/home/i ndex .h tml
·)
List of Permits Obtained:
The Hillcrest solid waste enclosure has received a Renton Building Permit. See Attachment B.
Requested clearances:
• Washington Department of Ecology: Certification of Consistency with Washington's Coastal
Zone Management Program for Federally Funded Activities (See Attachment C)
• Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Letter, No Historic Properties Affected,
August 4, 2016 (see Attachment D)
Programmatic maintenance and rehabilitation activities are subject to permits, including, but not limited
to:
• City of Renton building permits
• City of Renton Grading permits
• City of Renton Routine Vege tation Management Permits
• Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Asbestos/Demolition Notification Forms
• WAC 197-11-800 (1) Minor new construction, (2) Other minor new construction, (3) Repair,
remodeling and maintenance activities, (6) Land use decisions, (14) Activities of agencies, (15)
Financial assistance grants, and other relevant subsections of WAC 197-11-800.
• City SEPA rules in RMC 4-9-070, including but not limited to: RMC 4 -9-070.G.1.b whic h exempts
"landfills and excavations in WAC i97-11-800 (1)(b)(v): Up to fi ve hundred (500) cubic yards or
less."
Should grading or improvements or other activities exceed these thresholds, SEPA clearances wi ll be
required.
Public Outreach [24 CFR 50.23 & 58.43]:
A FONS! will be published in accordance with 24 CFR 58.43 -Dissemination and/or publication of the
findings of no significant impact. Accordingly a 15-day comment period will be held.
Cumulative Impact Analysis [24 CFR 58.32]:
This Environmental Assessment has addressed the programs and activities of a 5-year capital facility
pl an and operating subsidy, aggregating a number of exempt, categorica lly excluded, and other activities
subject to evaluation.
Alternatives [24 CFR 58.40(e); 40 CFR 1508.9]
The programmatic capital and operating proposals reflect categories of activities to meet federal, state,
and local requirements and meet the needs of residents to maintain properties, improve accessibility
u nder the ADA, remove obso lescent facilities and appliances, and remove hazards (asbe stos containing
materials).
The proposal does not involve unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of ava ilable resou r ces.
/
..J !, _)
Nevertheless, for the purposes of this evaluation, alternatives to exterior building alterations include:
different siding materials than concrete board. The primary objective is to reside Cole Manor due to
protect dwellings from the weather. Should a different material be appropriate to meet the objectives,
it may be considered.
The following alternatives are identified for site improvements:
• Removing or relocating sidewalks instead of replacing them
• Moving solid waste facilities to other site locations
• Removing or relocating fencing instead of replacing it
Current sidewalks are buck ling or in disrepair. Removing the sidewalks could remove hazardous
conditions if they exist, but would not improve accessibility. Sidewalks are generally in locations where
usage is desired; wholesale relocation may not provide comparable efficient access. However, under the
proposal minor rerouting of sidewalks to avoid trees may occur when replacing the sidewalks.
Solid waste facilities are generally found in central locations for both residents and solid waste service
provide rs who regularly collect the waste. Relocating them rather than replacing them could mean
adding impervious areas in new locations rather than making use of current disturbed areas.
Removing fencing could make sites less secure in terms of uninvited v isitors; relocating fencing may
disturb new areas compared to replacing fencing.
No Action Alternative [24 CFR 58.40(e)]:
Under a No Action Alternative, maintenance, rehabilitation, and site improvements would not be
implemented. Without the project, dwellings and site improvements would continue to age and reach
obsolescence, and sites would continue to be less easy to navigate in the absence of sidewalk
replacements or accessibility improvements.
Summary of Findings and Conclusions:
The proposals as designed and conditioned w ill not adversely impact natural or built environment
conditions. Activities are compatible with the existing uses in the area. The proposed project also will
not adversely impa ct existing resources or services in the area.
Mitigation Measures and Conditions [40 CFR 1sos.2(c)]
Summarize below all mitigation measures adopted by the Responsible Entity to reduce, avoid, or
el iminate adverse environmental impacts and to avoid non-compliance or non-conformance with the
above-listed authorities an d factors. These measures/conditions must be incorporated into project
contracts, development agreements, and other relevant documents. The staff responsible for
implementing and monitoring mitigation measures should be clearly identified in the mitigation plan.
Mitigation Measures and Conditions
Law, Authority, or Factor
Clean Air
I
I
' Contamination & Toxic Substances '
I '
Historic Preser,1cition
I
I
Endangered Species, Surface Water,
Mitigation Measure
Comply with Puget Sound Clean A ir Agency rules on Asbestos
Contro l Standards. Responsible Party: Contractors.
The City shall require all construction contractors to
implement air quality control plans for construction activities
in the project area. The air quality control plans should
include best management practices to control fugitive dust
and odors emitted by diesel construction equipment.
The following BMPs will be used to control fugitive dust.
• Use water sprays or other non-toxic dust control
methods on unpaved roadways.
• Minimize vehicle speed while traveling on unpaved
surfaces.
• PrP\/Pnt tr::irkn11t nf m11ri nntn n11hiir c;trPPtc;. . . -• -•• --• --•• --· --• • •• -· ----• -1-----•. ---• ----•
• Cover soil piles when practical.
Minimize work during periods of high winds when practical.
The following mitigation measures will be used to minimize
air quality and odor issues caused by tailpipe emissions.
• Maintain the engines of construction equipment
according to manufacturers' specifications.
• Minimize idling of equipment while the equipment is
not in use.
Responsible Party: City of Renton and Contractors.
No impacts are anticipated, but if evidence of potential
contamination is identified during project planning or
execution, procedures should be implemented for sampling
and analysis to evaluate the suspect material and provide for
appropriate handling and disposal of the material to ensure
protection of human health and the environment.
Responsible Party, Contractors.
No impacts to archaeological resources are anticipated. In the
event that ground disturbing or other activities do result in
the inadvertent discovery of archaeological deposits, work
should be halted in the immediate area and contact made
with DAHP in Olympia. Work should be halted until such time
as further investigation and appropriate consultation is
concluded. In the unlikely event of the in advertent discovery
of human remains, work should be immediately halted in the
area, the discovery covered and secured against further
disturbance, and contact effected with law enforcement
personnel. Responsib le Party, Contractors.
A. Use pervious materials to replace si dewalks to offset any
I
' I
I
. _)
Law, Authority, or Factor Mitigation Measure
and Aquifer Protection Zones added impervious areas for public facility o r site
improvements (e.g. solid waste enclosures or ADA
improvements), to achieve no-net-increase in site impervious
areas. Alternatively, implement best management practices
that achieve low impact development objectives and the
surface water design manual standards.
B. Reroute public facility improvements (e.g. replacement
sidewa lks) to retain trees. Alternatively replant trees if tree
removal is necessary consistent with City standards (RMC 4-4-1
130).
C. Comply with City surface water design manual as
app rop riate.
Responsible Party: Renton Housin g Authority.
Coastal Zone Management Act Apply as appropriate for a permit or certificatio n for State
wate r quality requirements if exceeding state thresholds.
Comply with City surface water design manual as appropriate
under any circumstance. Responsible Party: Renton Housing
Autho rity.
' Nois e Abatement and Control At Cole Manor seek the highest sound t ransm ission class
rated siding that meets capital facility needs and resources.
Responsible Party: Renton Housing Authority. (See
Attachment B for links to guidance documents.)
Code Authorities that Avoid Impacts:
City of Renton Municipal Code, Title IV
Chapter 4 CITY-WIDE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
4-3-050 CRITICAL AREAS REGULATIONS
4-4-030 DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS-GENERAL
4-4-040
4-4-060
4-4-070
4-4-090
4-4-130
FENCES, HEDGES, AND RETAINING WALLS
GRADING, EXCAVATION AND MINING REGULATIONS
LANDSCAPING
REFUSE AND RECYCLAB LES STANDARDS
TREE RETENTION AND LAND CLEARING REGULATIONS
Chapter 5 BUILDING AND FIRE PREVENTION STANDARDS
Chapte r 6, 4-6-030 DRAINAGE (SURFACE WATER) STANDARDS
Chapter 8 PERM ITS -GENERAL AND APP EALS
Chapter 9 PERMITS -SPECIFIC
4-9-080 GRADING, EXCAVATION AND MINING PERMITS AND LICENSES
4-9-195 ROUTINE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PERMITS
' .,) i j
Determination:
[SJ Finding of No Significant Impact [24 CFR 58.40(g)(1); 40 CFR 1508.27)
The project wil l not result in a significant impact on the quality of the human environment.
D Finding of Significant Impact [24 CFR 58.40(g)(2); 40 CFR 1508.27]
The project may significantly affect the quality of the human environment.
... ! ) / ;/ / Y:. . y~ Xii_ ( _/ ! .,..___ .,.
''-_.,/ (_ .cf,;?. 7J1/{,.{_£j (.'_,, L ·
Preparer Signature: ' Date: Augus t 22, 2016
Name/Title/Organ iza tion: Manager, BERK Consulting
Certifying Officer Signature:
City of Renton Environmental Review Committee (ER0.
Date:
Signature: __ -+-~---'---+~--------
.;
This original, signed documen t and related supporting material must be retained on file by the
Responsible Entity in an Environmental Review Record (ERR) for the activity/project (ref: 24 CFR Part
58.38) and in accordance with recordkeeping requirements for the HUD program(s).
STATE 01'' WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING }
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
PUBLIC NOTICE
Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal
Advertising R epre sentati ve of the
Renton Reporter
a weekly newspaper, which news paper is a legal newspaper of
general circulation and is now and has h ccn for more than s ix months
prior to the date of publication hereinafter referre d to , publi s hed in
the English l anguage continuously as a weekly news paper in King
County, Washington. The Ren ton R eporter h as heen approved as
a Legal News pape r by order of the Superior Court of the State of
Washington for King C ounty.
The notice in th e exact form annexed was published in regular is sues
of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was
re g ularly distributed to it s subscribers during th e belov., s tated pe riod.
The annexed notice, a:
Public Notice
was published on June I 0 , 2016.
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication 1s
the s um of S227.63 .
7 </(A //1 '(,£ -
clii1da Mills
Legal Adve11ising R e presenta tive, Renton Reporte r
Subs cribed and sworn to me thi s I 0th day of June , 2016. '' . ' . ::: '? ..
\\ ,,',,,,,,, ., ,,
.... .. .. .. ..
~~
Gale Gwin, Notary-'Public for the State of Washington, Res idin g in
Puyallup, Wa s hington
... . ' ..... :~, ...
t\O,:t>-µ'-1
\'v'o\__\(,
···· ... .--..
? -.... -:c-
.: >-= -•• · ,c:; ~ ., '> ·· .. ...... / ',, .. , rt::. ,, ,,, ~ ,,,,,,,
.. · ,~.:::
• '<),,, ,'
. \ \ \
," ,,
C ITY OF RE'.',TON
NOTICE or RE V I SED
RE CORD OF DECISIO'i
Sl"NSET A IU:A
C:01\1.\ll :\ITY EIS
:\ otice of Re\·ise d Record of
Decision Sun se t Area Commu-
nih• E IS The Cit\' of Renton.
act;ng under ll s -authority as
Responsible En ti ty (RF.I rm con -
ducti ng env iron mental review for
the US Department or Housing
and Urban Development (Il l I D).
hereby prov ides no t1 1:e of 1U;
Revised Record o r Decision
(ROD ) for the Suns et Area Com-
munity Pla nned Ac ti on Lnv 1ron-
mcntal Impact St atement (1-:I S)
An upd ated conceptual mas ter
plan proposes re dev el opment of
S unset Terrace an d adjacent
pr operties wit h m1xc d-1 nc om c.
mix ed-use rc s1 dcnt 1a l and com -
me r,rnl space and puhltc amen -
iti es . The m.kvelopmcnt wou ld
include a I-to-I Ut llt replacement
ror all 100 e.,ist ing publ ic hous-
i1m unit s either on-s ite at Su nset
Terrace or ol1~s1te at loc at ions
with in the C ity's 1-:1s Study Arca
The project wi 11 requ ire reloca-
tio n o f all existing residents and
RI IA ha s developed a re locat ion
plan as part of the demolition and
d1s pos1t1on permtls granted by
the l JS Depa rtment of I lo us ing
and Urban Dnelopment It is
expected that. with the Su nset
Terrace propcrtv and associated
propert ies owne d or purc hased
hy RI IA <>r by private develop-
ers (e .g. Colpitts Deve lopment
Company. I.LC) there would be
up to 722 total units on the Sun-
se t Terrace property mcludmg
ne arby bnd swap/ housing re -
placement sttcs. Public amenities
would be inte grated \Vith the de-
velopme nt and cou ld In cl ucle a
comm un1t\' gat hermg space: 1:1v-
" l'a,ili ties. a new park l<>rcn
space: re tail shoppin g and com-
mercia l spa ce. and green infr a-
st ru cture. The C1tv and RH/\ arc
current lv cons1dcnng amended
pla ns. developed 111 2016. tha t
wou ld ad d replaceme nt ho us mg
for the Sunset Terrace redevel o p-
ment on tive parcels located
ou tside but abuttmg the 20 I 4
Master Plan area. There would
be a redistributio n o f Master Pla n
dwelling unit s b0lh w1th 1n the
20 14 Master Plan area and on the
added five rarcc Is The proposed
changes would redistr ibu te Mas-
ter Plan dwcllmg unit s. but the re
wou Id be no net me r case m th e
total numb er or housmg uni ts in
the Master Plan area or 111 the
Sunset Arca ne ighborhood.
The C it~ of Rent on 1s also pro-
posm g to amend tt s Plan ned
Action Ordi nance app li cable t<>
the Sunset Arca rursuanl to
SE PA. 1\ Planned 1\ction Ordi-
nance d ocs no t require futu re
SIYA th reshold dc te rmmati ons
o r f' I Ss for future pro jects that
are consistent wi th El S assump-
t ions and mit igati o n mea sure s.
The EIS. pu blished 111 2011. ad-
dresses the prunary proposa l or
th e Sunse t Tc rr a,e are a redeve l-
orme nt anJ evaluates neig h bor-
hood redevc lopmen t anJ s up port-
ing services and infr as tr uct ure
in{provemcnts. Tota l gro "1h
studied in the Plan ned Action
Study ,\rea wou ld not change.
through some growth wt>u ld
he redistr ib uted in the Su nset
Terrace Master Plan area.
A Reeval uation. consistent with
appl ic able \Jat1 ona l Fnv1ronmen-
ta l P<>ilcy Act (NEPA ) regula-
tions. combmcd with a SEP,\
Addendum. was prepared to
eval uate the changes 111 the con-
ceptual master pla n The Re -
eval uat ion/ Addendum cone 1 ud cd
th at there wDuld no new or dif-
ferent impacts a nd that the con -
clusions of the EIS arc st ill va li d
The 1~01) documents the City ·s
cons ideration and co nclus ions
wit h rcsrcct to environme ntal
impacts and 1111t1gation measures
for vanous clement s of the envi-
ronment. as reqw red by NIJ'A
The RO I) d oes not rnnst itute
aprroval o r deve lDpm cnt of the
proposal .
The ROD 1s also co nsidered pan
o f the Env1ron111c nta l Review
Record . Copies of th e rcv 1serl
ROD arc available at the l'tty 's
1~ebs1te : http //rentonwa.~
sun sc tar ea/
l'ubl ished tn Re nt o n Reporte r o n
June 10. 201 (, # I 63 I 168
STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING }
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
PUBLIC NOTICE
Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that s he is the Legal
Advertising Representative of the
Renton Reporter
a weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of
general circulalion a nd i s now and has been for more than six months
prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred t o , published in
the English language continuously as a weekly new spaper in King
County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has b een approved as
a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of lhe State of
Washington for King County. ·
The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular iss ues
of the Renton Re porte r (and not in supplement form ) which was
reg ularly distribute d to it s subscribers during the below s tated period.
The annexed notice, a:
Public Notice
was pub I ished on Septembe r 30, 2016.
~rhe full amount of lhe fee charged for said foregoing publication is
the sum of $361.75.
'% /?{vf /7 ~ U -
II' I 111
• '1./
/ ....
inda Mill s ~
L egal Advertising Representative, R e nton Re porter
Subscribed a~ S;:Y9rn to me thi s 30th day of September, 2016.
~~
Gale Gwin, Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in
Covington , Washington
-:. ., .. ... ,, ::
~ --
~
C ITY OF RE'\TO'i
RE VISEi> '\OTICl OF
H'\OIN(; OF NU
S1GNIFICA'.\1T I\WACT A '\I>
NOTICE OF
1:\T E'.\'T TO REQU;;ST
R ELEASE OF Fl l'\l>S FOR
Sl l'.\'SET TERRACE
R EDEVELOPME.'\T
DAll:: Or NOT ICE
Seplcmher 2(,. 20 16
NA\,1f' or RF.Sl'ONSIHLL
ENTITY Cit, of Re nt on
L:\ND USE -..JUMl3lR.
, .uA 16-000630. r:cr
/\ I )J)R f'S S · l::nv1ronmcntal
Rev ie w Committee
Care of: Department of Commu-
nitv & Economic Deve lopment,
Ctirrent Plan111ng . I 05 5 South
Ci rad y WA . Renton. Vo/:\ 98055
STAFF CO\JTACT
Vanessa Do lbee , 42 ~-430-7200
PROJE CT NAME.
Renton Housi ng Authority Cap i-
tal hmd and Operat ing Subs idy
RRO F-2016 -20 20
These notice.1· Iha/I .rntisjj• two
separate but related proceduml
requiremellts for actfrith'S to be
w11lertake11 by tire Re111011
llmHilll( Authority.
Rf.QUEST FOR REI ,EASE
OFITNDS
( ln or a bout October 18. 2016 the
C1t\· of Re nton will a ut hori ze the
Rcinon I lousing Authontv to
submit a request lo the l JS I lc-
partmcnt o f 1 lousmg and !Jrhan
Devel opment for the re lease of
Annual Contr ibut1ons Con tra ct
\lumber SF-187. Amendment
Number 22-N, C,ran l Number
\V/\0 I PO 1150116. Capital Fund
Program. and Opcratmg Subsidy
fu nd s under 24 CFR Part 905 of
the lJm tcd S tates Hous in g s\ct of
193 7. Sec ti on 9, to underta~e a
pro_1ect kn own as WA O 11 Rento n
I lousmg /\uthont:y Cap ital Fund
and Operating Subsidy Proposed
Activ 1t1es for 20 16 -2020 for the
purpose of ma int enance. rehah1Ji-
tat 1on. and operation o f puhlic
hous ing. at a bout $330,000 annu-
ally fo r cap11ii l fund s mid up to
$642.000 an nua ll y for opcrat111g
subs idie s. between 20 I li -2020
The Rent o n I lousing 1\uthori t,·
manages eight subs1df~cd prope~-
t ies that are available to lo" 111-
comc households or low-mcomc
sen ior l'r disahkd househo ld s
These arc: :\) l lI!krcsl Terrace
144 2 ll 1llcrcst Lane NF. 8 ) Ev-
ergreen Te rrace 1027 Nf: 15th.
C ) Cole \,lanor 2811 NI:: 4th. D)
Sunset Terrace generally bound-
ed bv 'sT IO Street and <, Je nn-
wood :\ven ue NL S R 900. and
Edmonds Ave NE: I.:) Gknn-
W(xid Tm1n homcs I 14 I & 114 7
Glcnnwood Ave: F) Kirkland
Town homes 1508 K1 rkl,md 1\ve
\JI::: G ) Golden Pines Aparlmcnls
290 I NI:: I 0th. and 111 Cedar
River Terrace 5 1 l3urncn Street
:\II the pn1pert 1cs are located 111
the same general area in the C it)
o f Renton.
Ac11v1t1cs proposed under the
Capital 1:und and Operat ing S ub-
si d) lt ir the period 20 I(, -2020
111cludc: I ) Publ ic I lousmg Au -
lhomy-w1dc adrninistratio,;. op-
erati ons. tec hnical assis tance.
tra inmg, tee s and cos ts. and
del!vc~· or services such as
summer y(>uth programs 2 ) I .ow
Income Public I lousing Author-
ity-wide ma111tcnance includi ng
appliance rcrlaccmcnt . non-
dwelling c4u1rment and t()(ils 3)
Plans and designs of the Sunset
Terrace Rcplac;ment L ni ts (pnor
N 1-.l'A c learanc e in 2011 ) 4)
Mam tenance. Reh abilitation. and
Puhl!c r acility Jmrrnvcments at
Hi ll crest Terrace. Fvcr(!rccn Te r-
race. and Cole Manor. '
FINIHNG OF
'.\'O S!f;'>IFICA \T 11\IPACT
The Ci tv o f Re nto n has deter·
mined tl;al the rro1cc l wi ll ha ve
no sign itic ant impact o n the bu-
ma n environment. Therefore. an
Fnv1mnmenta l Impact Statement
under the National Fnvironmcn -
lal Pol icy Act o f 1969 11\'EPA) is
not required Additional pro1ect
in fo rma tion 1s contained in the
l:11v 1ro nmen1iil Review Record
(ERR ) on file at the City o f Re n-
ton. Department Df c;,mmurnt,·
& l::wnomic Development. De-
ve lopme nt Services. 10 55 South
Ciradv Wav, Renton. W/\ 9805.
wher~ F. RR can be exam, ned and
mav be examined (>r cop ied
weekdays 8 i\ M to 5 P. M
Pl Bl.IC CUJ\IMENTS
Any ind1v 1dual, group. or agency
may subm it written comments on
the ERR t,, the C1 tv of Renton
l::nv 1ronm cntal Re, i~w Cnmm1 l-
Lee All comments received bv:
October 17. 2016 wi ll be co nsid-
ered h) the City of Rent on prior
to authorizin!! subm1ss1on of a
req ues t for -release of fun J ,
Comments shou ld specif)· whic h
Not ice the y arc addressing
t::NVIRO'\'\H:\TAL CF.H-
TIFICATIOr'\ The C ity of
Renton cenifies to HlD that the
Fnvi ronmental I~ ev 1e w Comm it-
tee C('ns~nts lo accept the Jtms-
diction of the Federal Courts ,r
an act ion ,s bro ught to enforce
respons1hilH1es 111 relal 1on to the
env ironmental review proces s
and that these rcsp(lns 1J,Ii111es
have been sat isfi ed. 11 lJD ·s ap-
proval o f the eert1tication satis-
fies its respons1bi ht1es under
NEPA and related la ws and
auth orities and al lows the CH\' o f
Rent on to use Program fu nd s. ·
OBJECTIONS TO RELEASE
OF FllNDS II UD will accept
obJL-ct10 11s to its rclea,e of fu nd
and the Citv of Re nt on\ cert1fi -
cal1o n for a· period ('f fifteen davs
following the anticipated suhmi s-
sion date or !ls actual receipt o r
the request {whichever 1s later!
on ly if they arc on o ne of th e
followi ng bases. la) the cerll fica-
t1 on was not executed by the
Cert1fving omcer of the Citv or
Re nt o;1: (h) the Cit\ of Rc.nt on
ha s om itted a step · or failed to
ma~c a decision or fmdmg re-
qu ired by HUD reg ul ations at 24
(TR part 58: (cJ the grant rcc1p 1-
cnt or other part1c1pa nts 111 the
development process have com -
mi tt ed fun ds . incurred costs o r
undertaken activi ti es not author-
11.ed J,v 24 (TR !'art 58 before
approv:11 of a re lease o r fu nds by
1 IL:D. or Id ) another Fede ral
agencv act ing pursuant to 40
C H~ Part 1504 ha s submitted a
wrrllen findi ng that the prOJ CCt is
unsa tisfactorv from the stand-
point o r c~vimnmenta l quahtv
Objections mu st be prep ared and
submitted in acc ordance 1,·1th the
rc4u1red procedures {24 C FR
Part 58. Sec 58 76) and shall be
addressed to HI .' I) at Seattle
Rc2io nal omcc. Scalllc Federal
Otlicc Build in g. Oflicc o f Puhl!c
llous in~, 9119 Fir st Aven ue . Su ite
360. Seattle. W/1 9810,1-1 000
Potential oh_1ectors should con-
tact I IUD to venfv the actual last
day o r the ob.1cctio;1 pe ri od
Re s pon sible lntit)• CertifyinJ!
Officer
City of Renton F.nv1 ronmental
Rev1e1, Com mittee (ERC)
n ate o f Decisio n
Septcmi,er 26. 2016
Date of l'ub lr cat1on-
Sc ptember 30. 2016
Published 111 Renton Reporter on
Sertembcr 30. 2016 H 1703526.
CITY OF RENTON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
On the 30th day of September, 2016, I deposited in the mails of th e United States, a sealed envelope
containing ERC Notice and Determination documents. Thi s information was sent to:
Name Representing
Agencies See Attached
Mark Gropper, RHA Applicant/Owner
Cherie Shanks, HUD Agency
Christine Littleton, EPA Agency
Cecile Hanson, Duwamish Tribe Agency
I
Signature of Sender): ~MNX1
s TATE OF WASHINGTON \j
ss
COUNTY OF KING
I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct,
I know or have satisfactory evidence that Sabrina Mirante
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes
mentioned in the instrument.
Notary (Print): _____ __._._........, __ ,........... ........... _.._...,._ ____ --...;~"'r,--,.......,..._-~--
M y appointment expires:
Project Name: Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy RROF -2016 -2020
Project Number: LUA16 -000630, ECF
tem plat e -affidavit of serv ice by mailing
Dept. of Eco logy • *
Environmental Review Section
PO Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
WSDOT Northwest Region •
Attn: Ramin Pazooki
King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240
PO Box 330310
Seattle, WA 98133-9710
US Army Corp . of Eng i neers *
Seattle Distr ict Office
Attn: SEPA Reviewer
PO Box C-37S5
Seattle, WA 98124
Boyd Powe rs•••
Depart. of Natural Res ou rces
PO Box 47015
Olympia, WA 98504-7015
KC Dev. & Env i ronmental Serv.
Attn: SEPA Section
35030 SE Douglas St . #210
Snoqualm ie, WA 98065
Metro Trans it
Senior Environmenta l Planner
Gary Kriedt
201 South Jackson Street KS C-TR-0431
Seattle, WA 98104-3856
Sea t t le Publi c Utilities
Jalai ne Madura,
Attn : SEPA Responsible Offic ial
700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900
PO Box 34018
Seatt le, WA 98124-4018
AGENCY (DOE) LEITER MAILING
{ERC DETERMINATIONS)
Dept. of Ecology • •
Attn: M i sty Blair
PO Box 47703
O lympia, WA 98504-7703
Duwamish Tribal Office •
4717 W Ma rginal Way SW
Se att le, WA 98106-1 514
KC Wastewate r Treatment Division *
Environmental Planning Supervisor
Ms. Shirley Marroquin
201 S. Jac k son ST, MS KSC-NR-050
Seattle, WA 98104-3855
WDFW -Larry Fisher •
1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201
Issaqua h, WA 98027
City of Newcastle
Attn: Tim M c Harg
Di recto r of Community Development
12835 Newcastle Way, Ste 200
Newcastle, WA 98056
Puget So u nd Energy
Wendy Weiker, Community Svcs. Mgr.
355 llO'h Ave NE
Ma il stop EST llW
Bellevue, WA 98004
Puget Sound Energy
Doug Corbin, Municipal Lia iso n Mgr.
690 5 South 228'h St
Kent, WA 98032
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fi sheries Dept. **
Attn: Karen Walter o r SEPA Reviewer
39015 -172nd Avenue SE
Auburn, WA 98092
Muckleshoot Cu ltu ral Resources Program • •
Attn: Laura M urphy
39015 172"d Avenue SE
Auburn, WA 98092-9763
Muc kles hoot Cultura l Resources Prog ram**
Attn: Er i n Slaten
39015 172"d Avenue SE
Auburn, WA 98092-9763
Office of Archaeo logy & Historic Preservat ion*
Attn: Gretchen Kaeh ler
PO Box 48343
Olympia, WA 98504-8343
City of Kent
Attn : Char lene Anderson, AICP, ECD
22 0 Fourth Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032-5895
City of Tu kwila
Jack Pa ce, Responsib l e Officia l
6200 Southcente r Blvd .
Tukwi la, WA 98188
*Note: If the Notice of Appl ication states that it is an "Opt ional DNS", the marked agen c ies and ci t ies
will need t o be se nt a copy of the Environmenta l Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Noti ce of
Appl ica t io n.
•~Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Envi ro nmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notic e to
the following ema il address : sepaunit(dlecv.wa.gov
** Ka r en Wa lter, Laura Murphy and Erin Slaten with the Muckleshoot Indian Tr i be Fisheries Dept. are
emai led a copy of the Envi ronmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the fol lo wing email
addresses: KWalter(uJ mucklPstwo t .m r .. ,1~. I Ldur a .rr1ur phv(ilrnuck l eshoot. nsn.us L
~ri n.s 1a ten Im rr uckleshoot.nsn .us
***Department of Natural Resources i s ema iled a copy of the Environmenta l Chec k li st, Site Plan PMT,
& Notic e the fol lowing email address : sepi!ce nte1(i1ld n r.wa.gov
template -affidavi t of service by mailing
Renton Housing Authority
2900 NE 10th St
Renton, WA 98056
Christine Li tt leton
US Environmental Protection Agency
1200 6th Ave, MS-OERA -202-3
Seattle. WA 98101
Cecile Hanson
Duwamish Tribe
4705 W Marginal Way SW
Seattle. WA 98106
Mark Gropper
Renton Housing Authority
PO Box 2316
Renton. WA 98056
Cherie Shanks
US Dept. of Housing and Urban
Development
909 First Ave, Ste. 360
Seattle, WA 98104
NOTICE OF FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT AND NOTICE
OF INTENT TO REQUEST RELEASE OF FUNDS FOR SUNSET
TERRACE REDEVELOPMENT
DATE OF NOTICE:
NAME OF RESPONSIBLE ENTITY:
LAND USE NUMBER:
ADDRESS:
STAFF CONTACT:
PROJECT NAME:
REVISED
September 26, 2016
City of Renton
LUA16-000630, ECF
Environmental Review Committee
Care of: Department of Community & Econom ic Development, Current Planning
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Vanessa Dolbee, 425 -430-7200
Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy RROF-2016 -
2020
These notices shall satisfy two separate but related procedural requirements for activities to be undertaken by the
Renton Housing Authority.
REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS
On or about October 18, 2016 the City of Renton will authorize the Renton Housing Authority to submit a request to the
US Department of Housing and Urban Development for the release of Annual Contributions Contract Number SF -187,
Amendment Number 22-N, Grant Number WA01P01150116, Capital Fund Program, and Operating Subsidy funds under
24 CFR Part 905 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, Section 9, to undertake a project known as WAOll Renton
Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy Proposed Activities for 2016 -2020 for the purpose of
maintenance, rehabilitation, and operation of public housing, at about $330,000 annually for capital f unds and up to
$642,000 annually for operating subs idies, between 2016-2020.
The Renton Housing Authority manages eight subsidized properties that are available t o low income households or low-
income senior or disabled households. These are: A) Hi llcrest Terrace 1442 Hill crest Lane NE; B) Evergree n Terrace 3027
NE 15th; C) Cole Manor 2811 NE 4th; D) Sunset Terrace: generally bounded by NE 10 Street and Glennwood Avenue NE,
SR 900, and Edmonds Ave NE; E) Glennwood Townhomes 1141 & 1147 Glennwood Ave; F) Kirkland Townhomes 1508
Kirkland Ave NE; G) Golden Pines Apartments 2901 NE 10th; and H) Cedar River Terrace 51 Burnett Street. All the
properties are located in the same gene ral area in the City of Renton.
Ac ti vi ti es proposed under the Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy for the period 2016 -2020 include: 1) Public Housing
Authority-wide admin istration, operations, technica l ass istance, training, fees and costs, and de l ivery of services suc h as
summer youth programs. 2) Low Income Public Housing Authority-wide maintenance including app lian ce rep lacement,
non-dwelling equipment and tools. 3) Plans and designs of the Sunset Terrace Replacement Units (prior NEPA clearance
in 2011). 4) Maintenance, Rehabilitation, and Public Facility Improvements at Hillcrest Terrace, Evergreen Terrace, and
Cole Manor.
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
The City of Renton has determined that the project will ha ve no signifi cant impact on the human environment.
Therefore, an Environmental Impa ct Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) is not
required. Additional project inform ation is contained in the Environmental Review Record (ERR) on file at the City of
Renton, Department of Community & Economic Deve lopment, Development Services, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,
WA 9805, where ERR can b e exam in ed and may be exam ined or copied weekdays 8 A.M to 5 P.M.
Department of Community and
Economic Development
REVISED NOTICE OF FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO
REQUEST RELEASE OF FUNDS
FOR SUNSET TERRACE REDEVELOPMENT
DATE OF NOTICE: September 26, 2016
NAME OF RESPONSIBLE ENTITY: City of Renton
LAND USE NUMBER: LUA16-000630, ECF
ADDRESS: Environmental Review Committee
Care of: Department of Community & Economic De ve lopment, Current Planning, 1055 South Grady WA,
Renton, WA 98055
STAFF CONTACT: Vanessa Dolbee, 425-430-7200
PROJECT NAME: Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy RROF-2016 -2020
These notices shall satisfy two separate but related procedural requirements for activities to be
undertaken by the Renton Housing Authority.
REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS
On or about October 18, 2016 the City of Renton will authorize the Renton Housing Authority to submit a
request to the US Department of Housing and Urban Development for the release of Annual Contributions
Contract Number SF-187, Amendment Number 22-N , Grant Number WA01P01150116, Capital Fund
Program , and Operating Subsidy funds under 24 CFR Part 905 of the United States Housing Act of 1937,
Section 9 , to undertake a project known as WAOll Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating
Subsidy Proposed Activities for 2016 -2020 for the purpose of maintenance, rehabilitation, and operation
of public housing, at about $330,000 annually for capital funds and up to $642,000 annually for o perating
subsidies, between 2016 -2 020.
The Renton Housing Authority manages eight subsidized properties that are available to low income
households or low-income senior or disabled households. These are: A) Hillcrest Terrace 1442 Hillcrest
Lane NE; B) Evergreen Terrace 3027 NE 15th; C) Cole Manor 2811 NE 4th; D) Sunset Terrace: generally
bounded by NE 10 Street and Glennwood Avenue NE, SR 900, and Edmonds Ave NE; E) Glennwood
Townhomes 1141 & 1147 Glennwood Ave; F) Kirkland Townhomes 1508 Kirkland Ave NE; G) Golden Pines
Apartments 2901 NE 10th; and H) Cedar River Terrace 51 Burnett Street. All the properties are located in
the same general area in the City of Renton.
Activities proposed under the Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy for the period 2016 -2020 include: 1)
Public Housing Authority-wide administration, operations, technical assistance, training, fees and cos t s,
and delivery of services such as summer youth programs. 2) Low Income Public Housing Authority-wide
maintenance including appliance replacement, non-dwelling equipment and tools. 3) Plans and designs
of the Sunset Terrace Replacement Units (prior NEPA clearance in 2011). 4) Maintenance, Rehabilitation,
and Public Facility Improvements at Hillcrest Terrace, Evergreen Terrace, and Cole Manor.
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
The City of Renton has determined that the project will have no significant impact on the human
environment. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA} is not required. Additional project information is contained in the Environmental
Review Record (ERR) on file at the City of Renton, Department of Community & Economic Development,
Development Services, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 9805, where ERR can be examined and may
be examined or copied weekdays 8 A.M to 5 P.M.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any individual, group, or agency may submit written comments on the ERR to tile City of Renton
Environmental Review Committee. All comments received by: October 17, 2016 will be considered by the
City of Renton prior to authorizing submission of a request for release of funds. Comments should specify
which Notice they are addressing.
ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION
The City of Renton certifies to HUD that the Environmental Review Committee consents to accept the
jurisdiction of the Federal Courts if an action is brought to enforce responsibilities in relation to the
environmental review process and that these responsibilities have been satisfied. HUD 's approval of the
certification satisfies its responsibilities under NEPA and related laws and authorities and allows the City
of Renton to use Program funds.
OBJECTIONS TO RELEASE OF FUNDS
HUD will accept objections to its release of fund and the City ofRenton's certification for a period of fifteen
days following the anticipated submission date or its actual receipt of the request (whichever is later) only
if they are on one of the following bases: (a) the certification was not executed by the Certifying Officer
of the City of Renton; (b) the City of Renton has omitted a step or failed to make a decision or finding
required by HUD regulations at 24 CFR part 58; (c) the grant recipient or other participants in the
development process have committed funds, incurred costs or undertaken activities not authorized by 24
CFR Part 58 before approval of a release of funds by HUD; or (d) another Federal agency acting pursuant
to 40 CFR Part 1504 has submitted a written finding that the project is unsatdactory from the standpoint
of environmental quality. Objections must be prepared and submitted in accordance with the required
procedures (24 CFR Part 58, Sec. 58.76) and shall be addressed to HUD at Seattle Regional Office, Seattle
Federal Office Building, Office of Public Housing, 909 First Avenue, Suite 360, Seattle, WA 98104-1000.
Potential objectors should contact HUD to verify the actual last day of the objection period.
Responsible Entity Certifying Officer
City of Renton Environmental Review Committee (ERC)
Date of Decision: September 26, 2016
Date of Publication: September 30, 2016
NOTICE OF FIND I NG OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT AND NOTICE
OF INTENT TO REQUEST RELEASE OF FUNDS FOR SUNSE T
TERRACE REDEVELOPMENT
D ATE OF NOTICE:
NAME OF RESPONSIBLE ENTITY :
LAND USE NUMBER:
ADDR ESS:
STAFF CON TACT:
PROJECT NAME:
REVISED
September 26, 2016
City of Renton
LUA 16-000630, ECF
Env i ronmental Rev i ew Comm ittee
Ca r e of: Department of Community & Econo m ic Development, Current Planning
1055 South Grady Way
Rento n, WA 98055
Vanessa Dolbee, 425 -430-72 00
Renton Hous ing Au t hority Capi t al Fund and Operating Subsidy RROF-2016 -
2020
Th ese n otices shall satisfy two sep a rate but re lated procedural requirem e nts f or a ct ivities t o b e undertaken by the
Re nton Ho using Authority.
REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS
On or about Oc t ober 18, 2016 the City of Renton will author ize the Renton Housing Authority to subm it a request to the
US Department of Ho using an d Ur ban Deve lopment for the release of Annua l Contributions Contract Number SF-187,
Amendment Number 22-N, Grant Number WA01P0 1150116, Cap ital Fund Pr ogram, and Operating Subsi dy funds under
24 CFR Part 905 of t he United States Hous i ng Act of 1937, Sect ion 9, to underta ke a project known as WAOll Renton
Hous i ng Au t ho r i ty Cap ita l Fund and Operating Subsidy Proposed Activit ies for 2016 -2020 for the purpose of
maintenance, rehabilitation, and operation of pub lic housing, at about $330,000 annua ll y for cap ital funds and up to
$642,000 annually for operating subsidies, between 2016-2020.
The Rento n Hous ing Authority manages eight subsidi zed proper ties that are available to low income households or low-
i ncome senior or d isabled households. These are: A) Hi llcrest Terr ace 1442 Hi l lcrest Lane NE; B) Evergreen Te rra ce 3027
N E 15th; C) Cole Manor 281 1 NE 4th; D) Sunset Terrace : general ly bounded by NE 10 Street and Glennwood Avenue NE,
SR 900, and Edmonds Ave NE; E) Glennwood Townhomes 1141 & 1147 Glennwood Ave; F) Kirk land Townhomes 1508
Kirkland Ave NE; G} Golden Pines Apartment s 290 1 NE 10th; and H) Cedar River Terrace 51 Burnett Street. All the
properties are located in the same genera l area i n the City of Renton.
Activities proposed under the Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy for the period 2016 -2020 include: 1) Public Hous ing
Authority-w ide administration, operations, technica l assista nce, t r aining, fees and costs, and delivery of services such as
summer youth programs . 2) Low Income Publ ic Housing Authority-wide maintenance i ncl uding app liance replacement,
non-dwell ing equipment and tools. 3) Plans and des igns of the Sunset Terrace Replacement Units (prior NEPA c lea r ance
in 2011 ). 4) M aintenance, Rehabil itation, and Public Fa cility Improvement s at Hi ll crest Terrace, Everg r een Terrace, and
Cole Manor .
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
The City of Renton has det ermined that the proj ect w il l have no significant impact on the human environment.
Therefore, an Env i ronmental Impact Statement under t he Nationa l Environmental Po li cy Act of 1969 (NEPA} is not
required . Add it iona l proj ect information i s cont ained in the Environmenta l Rev ie w Recor d (ERR) on file at the City of
Renton, Department of Community & Eco nomic Deve lopment , Deve lopment Services, 1055 South Gr ady Way, Renton,
WA 9805, where ERR can be exam i ned and may be examined o r cop i ed w eekdays 8 A.M to 5 P.M .
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any individual, group, or agency may subm it written comments on the ERR to the City of Renton Envi ronmenta l Review
Comm ittee. All comments received by: October 17, 2016 will be cons idered by the City of Renton prior to authorizin g
submi ss ion of a request for release of funds. Comments should speci f y which Notice they are addressing.
ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION
The City of Renton certifi es to HUD that the Environmental Review Committee consents to accept the jurisdiction of the
Federa l Courts if an action is brought to enforce r esponsibilities in relation to the environmenta l review process and that
these resp onsibil ities have been satisfied. HUD 's approval of the certificat ion satisfies its r esponsibil ities under NEPA
and related laws and author ities and al lows the City of Renton to use Program funds.
OBJECTIONS TO RELEASE OF FUNDS
HUD will accept objections to its release of fun d and the City of Renton's certification fo r a period of fifteen days
followi ng the anticipated su bmission date or its actua l rece ipt of the request (whichever is later) only if they arc on one
of the followi ng bases: (a) the cert ification was not executed by the Certifying Officer of the City of Renton; (b) the City
of Ren t on has omitted a step or fa ile d to ma ke a decis ion or finding requ ired by HUD regulations at 24 CFR part 58; (c)
the grant r ecipient o r other participant s in the development pr ocess have comm itted funds, in curred costs or
undertaken activities not authorized by 24 CFR Part 58 before approval of a release of funds by HUD; or {d) another
Federa l agency acting pu r suant to 40 CFR Part 1504 has submitted a written finding that the project i s un satisfactory
from the sta ndpoint of env ironmental quality. Objections must be prepared and submitted i n accordance w i th the
required procedures (24 CFR Part 58, Sec. 58 .76) and shall be addressed to HUD at Seatt le Regional Office, Sea ttl e
Federa l Office Building, Office of Pub li c Housing, 909 First Avenue, Suite 360, Seatt le, WA 98104-1000. Potential
objectors should contact HUD to verify the actua l last day of the objection period .
Respon sible Entity Certifying Officer
City of Ren t on Environmenta l Review Committee (ERC)
Date of Decis ion: September 26, 20 16
Date of Pub li cation: September 30, 2016
Name, Signature ~M.;tf.1.UN IT1j ~IC€? AwtttJl5-r~A-70I<..
I'?. Q r7;t:/ _____ ___,_1_:_"'L::c.:r1c:..;"""k'----'r'-'1'-l-cc..::....:..,-=j.:.:..·" --=~~___,_;c;__:_,_:_"c'--------c_-=c._l-.....:..._,_f'~{.---
Nam e, Signature
Name, Signature
Ct,,,'t,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUN! 1 {
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RentOil
REVISED ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE REPORT
ERC MEETING DATE:
Project Name:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Owner:
Project Summary:
STAFF
RECOMMENDATION:
September 26, 2016
Renton Housing Authority Cap ital Fund and Operating Subsidy RROF-2016 -2020
LUA16-000630, ECF
Rocale Timmons, Senior Planner
Renton Housi ng Authority; 2900 NE 101h St; renton, WA 98056
The applicant, the Renton Housing Authority (RHA), is requesting National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review for their proposed Capital Fund and Operating
Subsidy activities for 2016 through 2020. All activities receiving Capital Fund Grants
and Operating Subsidies from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) are required to undergo review pursuant to the NEPA, consistent
with HUD 's ru les (24 CFR Part 58). The City of Renton is the NEPA Responsible Entity
(RE) for RHA proposals. NEPA review for RHA's proposed activities is being
accomplished by a single programmatic EA review for the period 2016 to 2020 and is
applicable to all affected properties in the Renton Housing Authority's portfolio. The
Renton Housing Authority manages eight subsidized properties that are available to
low i ncome households or low-income senior or d isabled households. Exempt and
non-exempt activities are proposed. Activities include: Public Housing Authority-wide
administration, operations, technical assistance, training, fees and costs, and delivery
of services such as summer youth programs; Low I ncome Public Housing Authority-
wide maintenance including appliance replacement, non-dwelli ng equipment and
tools; Plans and designs of the Sunset Terrace Replacement Units (prior NEPA
clearance in 2011); and maintenance, Rehabilitation, and Public Facility
Improvements at Hillcrest Terrace, Evergreen Terrace, and Cole Manor.
Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Revised
Notice of Intent to Release Funds (NOI-RROF)
On August 22, 2016 the Environmental Review Committee issued a Notice of Intent to Release Funds (NOI-RROF) for
the Renton Housing Authority (RHA), for their proposed Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy ac tivit ies for 2016 t hrough
2020. All activities receiving Capital Fund Grants and Operating Subsidies from the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development (HUD) are re quired to undergo review pursuant to the NEPA, consistent with HU D's rules (24 CFR
Part 58).
On September 20, 2016 the City submitted the packaged RROF. However, on September 22, 2016 HUD brought to
the City's atte ntion that the Finding of No Signific ance/ Notice of Intent to Request Release of Fund s (FONSI/NOI -
RROF) did not go to HUD o r EPA.
As a result, the City will iss ue a revised Notice of Intent to Release Funds (NOI-RROF}. After a new waiti ng period, if
no objections are filed, the ERC will re-issue th e Request for Release of Funds (RROF) document to H UD .
Revised ERC Report -RROF NOi -9 26 16
U.S. Department of nousing and Urban
Development
451 Seventh Street, SW
Washington, DC 20410
www.hud.gov
espanol.hud.gov
Environmental Assessment
Determinations and Compliance Findings for HUD-assisted Projects
24 CFR Part 58
Project Information
Project Name: WA011 Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy Proposed
Activities for 2016 -2020
Responsible Entity: City of Renton
Grant Recipient (if different than Responsible Entity): Renton Hous i ng Authority
State/Local Identifier: WA011
Preparer: Lisa Grueter, Manager, BERK Consulting
Certifying Officer Name and Title: Mayor Denis Law and designee the Environmental Review
Committee
Grant Recipient (if different than Responsible Entity): Renton Housing Authority
Consultant (if applicable): BERK Consulting, with Cultural Resource Consultants LLC, Landau Associates,
and Weinman Consulting LLC
Direct Comments to:
Rocale Timmons
City of Renton -Current Planning
Senior Planner
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
Te l: (425) 430-7219
Fax: {425) 430-7300
rti mmons@ r entonwa .gov
Project Location :
See Exhibit 1 for physical locations. Sites are listed below:
• Hil l crest Terrace 1442 Hillcrest lane NE
• Evergreen Terrace 3027 NE 15th
• Cole Manor 2811 NE 4TH
• Sunset Terrace: generally bounded by Sunset lane NE and Glenwood Avenue NE on the north,
NE 10th Street on the east, NE Sunset Boulevard (State Route [SR] 900) on the south, and
Edmonds Avenue NE on the west
• Glennwood Townhomes 1141 & 1147 Glennwood Avenue
• Kirkland Townhomes 1508 Kirkland Ave NE
• Golden Pines Apartments 2901 NE 10th
• Cedar River Terrace 51 Burnett Street
Exhibit 1. Renton Housing Authority Properties under Evaluation
Henton Housjng A1.,1thority: Subsidized Properties
,_; :;111 St
(>...:tJar River
8T•-:rr<1ce
JI BERK
Source: King County, City of Renton , BERK Consulting 2016
\f /th St -
Cole Manor
A
Description of the Proposed Project [24 CFR 50.12 & 58.32; 40 CFR 1508.25]:
The proposal consists of Renton Housing Authority's (RHA's) proposed Capital Fund and Operating
Subsidy activities for 2016-2020. Activities include:
• Public Housing Authority-wide administration, operations, technical assistance, training, fees
and costs, and delivery of services such as summer youth programs.
• Low Income Public Housing Authority-wide maintenance including appliance replacement, non-
dwelling equipment and tools.
• Plans and designs of the Sunset Terrace Replacement Units (prior NEPA clearance in 2011).
• Maintenance, Rehabilitation, and Public Facility Improvements at Hillcrest Terrace, Evergreen
Terrace, and Cole Manor.
See Attachment A Project Description for details.
Statement of Purpose and Need for the Proposal [40 CFR 1508.9(b)J:
The purpose and need for the proposal is the proper operation and administration of the Renton
Housing Authority and its ongoing maintenance of low income public hous i ng units and properties, as
well as staff training and equipment, and programs for residents.
The rehabil itation and site improvements will increase the livability and accessibility of the dwelling
units and sites by modernizing fixtures, removing asbestos containing materials, and removing ADA
barriers including replacing sidewalks and adding ramps and other improvem ents.
Existing Conditions and Trends [24 CFR 58.40(a)]:
Without the project, dwellings and site improvements would continue to age and reach obsolescence,
and sites would continue to be less convenient or safe to navigate for res i dents and pedestrians in the
absence of sidewalk replacements or accessibility improvements.
Funding Information
RHA's Grant Numbe r is WA 19PO 1150116. Exhibit 2 and Exhibit 3 identify the capital fund grant and
operating subsidy over the 2016-2020 period.
Exhibit 2. Capital Fund Grant
Fiscal Year
WAQ1P_Q11501-16 (FY J016)
Estimated 2017
Estimated 2018
Estimated 2019
Estimated 2020
Grant
$325,037
$330,000
$330,000 •
; $330,000
. $330,000 •
Source: US HUD District 10, Renton Housing A uthority 2016
. Ex hibit 3. Operati~~ ~ubsi~y
Fiscal Year Subsidy
2016 $641,696 i . . ,....... .. I
Estimate based on 2016 LIPH inventory 2017 i $600,000 ·
--···-··-~-··-·· ¥ ···-··----------··--------
Estimate based on 2016 LIPH inventory 2018 $600,000 ,
Estimate _~.a~~-~--~n_2016 LIPH_ inven~~!.Y .. ?_Ql~_.}6Q9,ooo
Estimate based o n 2016 LIPl-l_inventory 2020 $600,000 .
Source: US HUD Di strict 10, Renton Housing Authority 2016
Estimated Total HUD Funded Amount:
See Exhibit 2 and Exhibit 3.
Estimated Total Project Cost (HUD and non-HUD funds) [24 CFR 58.32(d)J:
No other funds are included except HUD funds. For the total project cost see Exhibits 1 and 2.
Compliance with 24 CFR 50.4, 58.5, and 58.6 Laws and Authorities
Record below the compliance or confor-nance determinations for each statute, executive order, or
regulation. Provide credible, traceable, ad supportive source documentation for each authority. Where
applicable, complete the necessary reviews or consultations and obtain or note app licable permits of
approvals. Clearly note citations, dates/names/titles of contacts, and page references. Attach additional
documentation as appropriate.
Compliance Factors: Statutes, Are formal Compliance determinations
Executive Orders, and compliance
Regulations listed at 24 CFR s·:eps or
§58.5 and §58.6 m itigation
required?
STATUTES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, AND REGULATIONS LISTED AT 24 CFR 50.4 and 58.6
Airport Hazards Y ,!S No No sites are in the Runway Protection Zone or
[] [SJ Accident Potentia l Zone .
24 CFR Part 51 Subpart D The Cedar River Terrace site is located outside
the area where height restrictions apply per FAR
Part 77 of Renton Municipal Ai r port. It is located
in the Traffic Pattern Zone (6); future
development is subject to review and potential
conditions regarding density, notice on titles,
and other provisions. No new units or
development are proposed on the subject site.
See RMC 4-3-020 Airport Related Height and
Use Restrictions. See worksheet in Attachment
I
Compliance Factors: Statutes, Are formal Compliance determinations
Executive Orders, and compliance
Regulations listed at 24 CFR steps or
§58.5 and §58.6 mitigation
required?
B, RMC 4-3-020 Airport Related Height And Use
Restrictions, and detailed height map Re nton
Munici12al Air12ort Bui lding Height Restrictions .
Coastal Barrier Resources Yes No Not applicable. Renton is not located on the
D ~ marine coast.
Coastal Barrier Resources Act, as
amended by the Coastal Barrier
Improvement Act of 1990 [16
USC 3501]
Flood Insurance Yes No The Cedar River Terrace site is located in the
D ~ 500-year floodplain but no critical actions are
Flood Disaster Protection Act of proposed; physical activities are limited to
1973 and Nati onal Flood maintenance. See worksheet in Attachment B
Insurance Reform Act of 1994 [42 and map illustrating Zone X fl ood12lain boundary
USC 4001-4128 and 42 USC {500 year floodplain).
5154a]
STATUTES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, AND REGULATIONS LISTED AT 24 CFR 50.4 & 58 .S
Clean Air Yes No The Puge t Sound region is considered a
~ D maintenance area , and is not designated a non-
Clean Air Act, as amended, attai nment area . City of Rent on r egulatio ns
particularly section 176(c) & (d); regarding construction apply and address dust
40 CFR Parts 6, 51, 93 and other matters; additional best management
practices are recommended to control dust. No
operational increases in traffic trips are
anticipated as no dwellings are added. Puget
Sound Clean Air Agency rules on Asbestos
Control Standards apply.
Coastal Zone Management Yes No The project is within the Washington coastal
~ D zone management area. The City of Renton
Coastal Zone Management Act, submitted its request for consistency
sections 307(c) & (d} determination to the Washington State
Department of Ecology (Ecology). See
Attachment C Department of Ecology
determination of consistency letter to City of
Renton.
Contamination and Toxic Yes No This review found no evidence of known or
Substances ~ D suspected contamination at any of the three
properties. Therefore, no additional
24 CFR Part 50.3(i) & 58.S(i)(2) investigation is warranted based on the project
Compliance Factors: Statutes, Are formal Compliance determinations
Execu tive Orders, and compliance
Regulations li st ed at 24 CFR steps or
§58.5 and §58.6 mitigation
required?
as defined, and the information reviewed.
However, if evidence of potential contamination
is identified during project planning or
execution, procedures should be implemented
for sampling and analysis to evaluate the
suspect material and provide for appropriate
handling and disposal of the material to ensure
protection of human health and the
environment. See Attachment B including EDR
report excerpts. Full EDR reports for the three
sites where exterior site alterations are
proposed (Hillcrest Terrace, Evergreen Terrace,
and Cole Manor) are available with the
Environmental Review Record.
Endangered Species Yes No The capital and operating subsidy projects
[;gJ D cons idered in 2016 for Hillcrest Terrace,
Endangered Species Act of 1973, Evergreen Te rrace, and Cole Manor are not
particularly section 7; 50 CFR anticipated to result in increased runoff beyond
Part 402 current conditions and would not have the
potential to change pollutant loading relative to
current conditions due to: app lication of surface
wa ter and aquifer protection standards in the
Renton Municipal Code, no net increase in
impervious area, and no new impervious
surfaces accessible to ve hicular traffic.
Therefore no effect to listed fish species is
anticipated. Based on a review of the
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's
Priority Habitats a nd Species database no li sted
wildlife species or critical habitat are found on
the subject sites .
Explosive and Flammable Yes No There are no above ground storage tanks within
Hazards D [;gJ 1 mile of the sites where rehabilitation is
proposed. See Attachment B including EDR
24 CFR Part 51 Subpart C report excerpts. Full EDR reports for the three
sites where exterior site alterations are
proposed (Hillcrest Terrace, Evergree n Terrace,
and Cole Manor) are available with the
Environmental Review Record.
Compliance Factors: Statutes, Are formal Compliance determinations
Executive Orders, and compliance
Regulations listed at 24 CFR steps or
§58.5 and §58.6 mitigation
required?
Farmlands Protection Yes No Not applicable. Sites are already developed for
D (2) urban use. See Attachment B.
Farmland Protection Policy Act of
1981, particularly sections
1504(b) and 1541; 7 CFR Part 658
Floodplain Management Yes No The Cedar River Terrace site is located in the
D (2) 500-year floodplain but no critical actions are
Executive Order 11988, proposed. See worksheet in Attachment Band
particularly section 2(a); 24 CFR map illustrating Zone X flo od i;ilain bou nd ar:i
Part 55 (500 year floodplain).
Historic Preservation Yes No The project will not affect any previously
C8J D recorded historic properties. See Attachment D.
National Historic Preservation None of the propose d activities at Cole Manor
Act of 1966, particularly sections and Hillcrest Terrace, nor the addition of the
106 and 110; 36 CFR Part 800 garbage recycling station at Hillcrest in March
2016, will affect aboveground historic
properties. The Evergreen Terrace facility, built
in 1968, was identified by DAHP as over 45 years
i n age and in need of review at the EZ-2 level. A
short report form was provided to DAHP, and
DAHP found that no historic properties will be
affected by the current project as proposed in
correspondence dated August 4, 2016.
Compliance Factors: Statutes, Are formal Compliance determinations
Executive Orders, and compliance
Regulations listed at 24 CFR steps or
§58.5 and §58.6 mitigation
required?
Noise Abatement and Control Yes No Evergreen Terrace and Cole Manor are within
[3J D 1,000 feet of principal arterials ..
Noise Control Act of 1972, as
amended by the Quiet Evergreen Terrace at its closest point is about
Communities Act of 1978; 24 CFR 285 feet from the SR 900 centerline, and Cole
Part 51 Subpart B Manor is about 88 feet from the NE 3 'd Street
centerline west of Jefferson Avenue NE.
Using HUD's online tool, noise levels ar e
acceptable for Evergreen Terrace (not exceeding
65 db). No mitigation is needed.
Cole Manor is above 65 dB but not exceeding 70
dB, considered normally unacceptable for new
construct ion; attenuation is encouraged for
modernization . New construction of dwellings is
not proposed.
Since new concrete board siding is proposed
between the eaves and current brick fac;ade, it is
recommended that the highest sound
transmission class (ST() rated board that meets
the capital program needs and resources be
applied.
Sole Source Aquifers Yes No Cole Manor is located in the Cedar Valley sole
~ D source aquifer; see Ce d a r Val l ey 2 map. The
Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, project is not likely to affect Sole Source Aquifer
as amended, particularly section quality. Sizes of residential structures will stay
1424(e); 40 CFR Part 149 the same. Sizes of public facilities may slightly
expand impervious area (e.g. ADA
improvements). It is anticipated that sidewalk
replacements will be pervious leading to no-net-
increase in impervious area. Improvements are
subject to the City's aquifer protection
regulations a nd surface water design manual,
consist of non-pollutant generating surface s,
and are in locat ions served by public water,
sewer, and storm drainage systems.
Wetlands Protection Yes No There are no known wetlands on subject
D [3J properties. See Attachment B and Wetlands and
Executive Order 11990, Wate r Class ificat ions map.
Compliance Factors: Statutes, Are formal Compliance determinations
Executive Orders, and compliance
Regulations listed at 24 CFR steps or
§58.5 and §58.6 mitigation
required?
particularly sections 2 and 5
Wild and Scenic Rivers None of the project sites are within proximity of
Yes No a Wild and Scenic River, based on a review of
Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of D [gJ National Park Se rvice information for
1968, particularly section 7{b) Washington State .
and (c)
ENVIRONMENTAL JUST ICE
Environmental Justice Yes No Proposed rehabilitation will improve the quality
D [2J of the indoor environment for residents (e.g.
Executive Order 12898 removal of asbestos containing material), and
will also improve access for elderly and disabled
residents (e.g. ADA improvements). No adverse
environmental impacts are anticipated.
Environmental Assessment Factors [24 CFR 58.40; Ref. 40 CFR 1508.8 &1508.27] Recorded below is the
qualitative and quantitative significance of the effects of the proposal on the character, features and
resources of the project area. Each factor has been evaluated and documented, as appropriate and in
proportion to its relevance to the proposed action. Verifiable source documentation has been provided
and described in support of each determination, as appropriate. Credible, traceable and supportive
source documentation for each authority has been provided. Where applicable, the necessary reviews
or consultations have been completed and applicable permits of approvals have been obtained or
noted. Citations, dates/names/titles of contacts, and page references are clear. Additional
documentation is attached, as appropriate. All conditions, attenuation or mitigation measures have
been clearly identified.
Impact Codes: Use an impact code from the following list to make the determination of impact for each
factor.
(1) Minor beneficial impact
(2) No impact anticipated
(3) Minor Adverse Impact -May require mitigation
(4) Significant or potentially significant impact requiring avoidance or modification which may require
an Environmental Impact Statement
Environmental Impact
Assessment Factor Code Impact Evaluation
LAND DEVELOPMENT -
Conformance with 2 here will be no change in use of the subject sites; all are zoned
Plans/ Compatible
Land Use and Zoning/
Scale and Urban
Design
Soil Suitability/ Slope/
Erosion/ Drainage/
Storm Water Runoff
Hazards and
Nuisances
including Site Safety
and Noise
Energy Consumption
Env ironmental
Assessme nt Factor
Employment and
Income Patterns
Demographic
Character Changes,
Di splacement
Environmental
Assessment Fact
2
3
1
Impact
Code
2
2
~or r esidential or mixed use/ residential-commercial purposes.
.. Hillcrest Terrace 1442 Hillcrest Lane NE: R-14 .. Evergreen Terrace 3027 NE 151h: Center Village
• Cole Manor 2811 NE 4TH: RM-F
• Sunset Terrace, SR 900: Center Village
" Cedar River Terrace 51 Burnett Street: Center Downtown
" Glennwood Townhomes 1141 & 1147 Glennwood
Avenue: R-14
• Golden Pines Apartments 2901 NE 101h: Center Village
Q Kirkland Townhomes 1508 Kirkland Ave NE: R-14
Pro posed capital projects would be compatible with the scale
iand _:Ja ttern of existing land use.
1So m2 areas of steep slopes are mapped on the Hillcrest Terrace
land Evergreen Terrace sites. Moderate land slides are mapped in
lthe Evergreen Terrace area. Stormwater systems serve all sites
und e r review. See maps: Erosion Hazard, Landslide Hazard, Steep
~;~ and Storm Water . Where site disturbance is proposed for
IADA improvements, sidewalk replacements, and similar exterior
lacti v ties, the application of City regulations for critical areas,
!gra d i ng and erosion contro l, stormwater, landscaping, and
rela t ~d standards in Renton Municipal code Title IV will address
iany :,otential impacts. (See list under Mitigation Measures and
ICon r:itions below.)
ISee •::-ontamination and Toxic Substances and Noise Abatement
iabo ve . With proposed mitigation, no impacts are anticipated.
!Som e maintenance and rehabilitation includes implementation
!Of e ne rgy saving light bulbs.
Impact Evaluation
SOCIOECONOMIC
No ir:plementation of econ omic uses and no displacement of
busi n,~sses would occur. ·-·--·-----
Units will be rehabilitated when vacated and made ready for
new te nants. No displacement would occur.
Impact Evaluation
COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES
Educational and
Cultural Facilities
2
'-------------------
No fa c i lities of this type will be added or displaced.
Commercial Facilities 2 No facilities of this type will be added or displaced.
Health Care and Social 1 Summer youth programs are proposed for funding.
Services
Solid Waste Disposal/ 2 Any construction will follow proper solid waste disposal per City
Recycling codes (RMC 8-1). At Hillcrest Terrace and Cole Manor, collection
and storage of solid waste will be more efficient.
Waste Water/ 2 All sites are served by sewers; no change in numbers of dwelling
Sanitary Sewers units is proposed and no impacts are anticipated.
See: Wastewater.
Water Supply 2 All sites are served by the City's water system; no change in
numbers of dwelling units is proposed and no impacts are
anticipated. See: Dr ink ing Wate r.
Public Safety -Police, 2 All sites are served by the City's police and fire departments; no
Fire and Emergency change in numbers of dwelling units is proposed and no impacts
Medical are anticipated. See: Fire Station Response Areas, and Police
Deoartment Patro l Areas .
Parks, Open Space 2 iSites are served by the Renton Parks system. No change in
and Recreation numbers of dwelling units is proposed and no impacts are
enticipated. It should be noted that a central park is to be added
at Sunset Terrace, expanding and consolidating park area in the
~icinity. See: Renton Trails and Bikewa~s Guide including parks.
Transportation and 1 ISites are served by local and state roads (see Arterials); no
Accessibility k:lwellings are added and no increases in daily traffic are
anticipated. Onsite ADA and sidewalk improvements will
improve accessibility by the disabled and elderly.
Environmental Impact
Assessment Factor Code Impact Evaluation
NATURAL FEATURES
Unique Natural 2 rrhere are no onsite unique natural features. Water resources
Features, Will be protected by the nature of the proposals (e.g. replacing
Water Resources !Sidewalks with pervious materials) and application of City
IStormwater requirements where applicable.
Vegetation, Wildlife 2 ISee endangered species above.
Other Factors 2 None.
Additional Studies Performed:
List of Attachments:
A. Project Description
B. Checklists Regarding 24 CFR 50.4, 58.5, and 58.6 Laws and Authorities
C. Department of Ecology Coastal Zone Management Determination of Consistency Letter
D. Cultural Resources Assessment for the Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capital Facility Program,
Renton, King County, WA, Techn i ca l Memo, August 4, 2016, including Department of
Archaeology and Historic Preservation Letter, No Historic Properties Affected, August 4, 2016
Field Inspection (Date and completed by):
No field investigati on was conducted. Sites were reviewed by aerial photos i n Goog le Earth.
List of Sources, Agencies and Persons Consulted [40 CFR 1S08 .9 (b)]:
Agencies:
Washington Department of Ecology, Coastal Zone Management (see Attachment C)
Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (see Attachment D)
Duwa mish Tribe (s e e Attachment D)
:v11 .. h .. kle shoot Indian Tribe (see Attachment D)
Snoqualmie Indian Tribe (see Attachment D)
Renton Housing Authority, Mark Gropper, Sean McCarty
Schemata, Grac e Kim, Guy Thomsen
Sources and Additional Resource s Us e d:
See Attachment B regarding sources address ing 24 CFR 50.4, 58.5, and 58.6 Laws and Authorities.
Cit-; of Renton Map Gallery
Airport Area Elevations -South
Aquifer Protection
Arterials
Drinking Water
Erosion Hazard
Fire Station Response Areas
Flood Hazard
L_ilfl_dslide Haz_2r_d
Police Department P,9 tr,ol~r:.eas
Renton Trails and Bikeways Guide
StccQ..£Q~
Storm Wate r
Wastewate r
Wetlands_a nd Water_<::lassifications
Zon ing
Envkonmental Protection Agency: Sole Source Aquifer Maps: Cedar_Valley_ 2
King County iMap: http://www .. kingco u nty.gov/services/gis/Maps/imap.aspx
WSDOT -Freight and Goods: http://wsdot .. maps.a r cgis .com/home/index.html
WSDOT Community Planning Portal: http://wsdot.maps.arcgis.com/home/index html
List of Permits Obtained:
The Hillcrest solid waste enclosure has received a Renton Building Permit. See Attachment B.
Requested clearances :
• Washington Department of Ecology: Certification of Consistency w ith Washington's Coastal
Zone Management Program for Federally Funded Activities (See Attachment C)
• Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Letter, No Hi storic Properties Affected,
August 4, 2016 (see Attachment D)
Programmatic maintenance and rehabilitation activities are subject to permits, including, but not limited
to:
• City of Renton building permits
• City of Renton Grading permits
• City of Renton Routine Vegetation Management Permits
• Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Asbestos/Demolition Notification Forms
As presented capital and operating subs idy activities are exempt from SEPA under these rules:
• WAC 197-11-800 (1) Minor new construction, (2) Other minor new construction, (3) Repair,
remodeling and maintenance activities, (6) Land use decisions, {14) Activities of agencies, {15)
Financial assistance grants, and other relevant subsections of WAC 197-11-800.
• City SEPA rules in RMC 4-9-070, includ ing but not limited to: RMC 4-9-070.G.1.b which exempts
"landfills and excavations in WAC 197-11-BOO (l)(b)(v): Up to five hundred (500) cubic yards or
less."
Should grading or improvements o r other activities exceed these thresholds, SEPA clearances wil l be
required.
Public Outreach [24 CFR 50.23 & 58.43]:
A FON SI will be published in accordance w ith 24 CFR 58.43 -Dissemination and/or publication of the
findings of no significant impact. Accordingly a 15-day comment period will be held.
Cumulative Impact Analysis [24 CFR 58.32]:
This Environmental Assessment has addressed the programs and activ ities of a 5-year capital facility
plan and operating subsidy, aggregating a number of exempt, categorically excluded, and other activities
subject to evaluation.
Alternatives [24 CFR 58.40(e); 40 CFR 1508.9]
The programmatic capital and operating proposals reflect categories of act ivitie s to meet federal, state,
and local requirements and meet the needs of residents to maintain properties, improve accessibility
under the ADA, remove obsolescent facilities and appliances, and remove hazards {asbestos containing
materials).
The proposal does not involve unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of available resources.
Nevertheless, for the purposes of this evaluation, alternatives to exterior building alterations include:
different siding materials than concrete board. The primary objective is to reside Cole Manor due to
protect dwellings from the weather. Should a different material be appropriate to meet the objectives,
it may be considered.
The following alternatives are identified for site improvements:
• Removing or relocating sidewalks in stead of replacing them
• Moving solid waste facilities to other site locations
• Removing or relocating fencing instead of replacing it
Current sidewalks are buckling or in disrepair. Removing the sidewalks could remove hazardous
conditions if they exist, but would not improve accessibility. Sidewalks are generally in locations where
usage is desired; wholesale relocation may not provide comparable efficient access. However, under the
proposal minor rerouting of sidewalks to avoid trees may occur when replacing the sidewalks.
Solid waste facilities are generally found in central locations for both residents and sol id waste service
providers who regularly collect the waste. Relocating them rather than replacing them could mean
adding imperv ious areas in new locations rathe r than making use of current disturbed areas.
Removing fencing could make sites less secure in terms of uninvited visitors; relocating fencing may
disturb new areas compared to replacing fencing.
No Action Alternative [24 CFR 58.40(e)]:
Under a No Action Alternative, maintenance, rehabilitation, and site improvements would not be
implemented. Without the project, dwellings and site improvements would continue to age and reach
obsolescence, and sites would continue to be less easy to navigate in the absence of sidewalk
replacements or accessibility improvements.
Summary of Findings and Conclusions:
The proposals as designed and cond itioned will not adversely impact natural or built environment
conditions . Activities are compatible with the existing uses in the area. The proposed project also will
not adversely impact existing resources or services in the area.
Mitigation Measures and Conditions [40 CFR 1sos.2(c)]
Summarize below all mitigation measures adopted by the Responsible Entity to reduce, avoid, or
elimin ate adverse environmenta l impacts and to avo id non-compliance or non-conformance with the
above-listed authorities and factors. These measures/conditions must be incorporated into project
contracts, development agreements, and other relevant documents. The staff responsible for
implementing and monitoring mitigation measures should be clearly identified in the mitigation plan.
Mitigation Measures and Conditions
Law, Authority, or Factor Mitigation Measure
Clean Air Comply with Puget Sound Clean Air Agency rules on Asbestos
Contro l Standards . Responsible Party: Contractors.
The City shall require all construction contractors to
implement air quality control plans for construction activities
in the project area. The air quality control plans should
include best management practices to control fugitive dust
and odors emitted by diesel construction equipment.
The following BMPs will be used to control fugitive dust.
• Use water sprays or other non-toxic dust control
methods on unpaved roadways.
• Minimize vehicle speed while traveling on unpaved
surfaces.
• Prevent trackout of mud onto public streets .
• Cover soil piles when practical.
Minimize work during periods of high winds when practical.
The following mitigation measures will be used to minimize
air quality and odor issues caused by tailpipe emissions.
• Maintain the engines of construction equipment
according to manufacturers' specifications .
• Minimize idling of equipment while the equipment is
not in use.
Responsible Party: City of Renton and Contractors.
Contamination & Toxic Substances No impacts are anticipated, but if evidence of potential
contamination is identified during project planning or
execution, procedures should be implemented for sampling
and analysis to evaluate the suspect material and provide for
appropriate handling and disposal of the material to ensure
protection of human health and the environment.
Responsible Party, Contractors.
Historic Preservation No impacts to archaeological resources are anticipated. In the
event that ground disturbing or other activities do result in
the inadvertent discovery of archaeological deposits, work
should be halted in the immediate area and contact made
with DAHP in Olympia. Work should be halted until such time
as further investigation and appropriate consultation is
concluded. In the unlikely event of the inadvertent discovery
I of human remains, work should be immediately halted i n the I
area, the discovery covered and secured against further I
disturbance, and contact effected with law enforcement I
personnel. Responsible Party, Contractors. I
I
Endangered Species, Surface Water, A. Use pervious materials to replace sidewalks to offset any I
Law, Authority, or Factor Mitigation Measure
and Aquifer Protection Zones adde d impervious areas for public facility or site
impr ovements (e.g. solid waste enclosures or ADA
impr ovements), to achieve no-net-increase in site impervious
areas. Alternatively, implement best management practices
that achieve low impact development objectives and the
surfa ce water design manual standards.
B. Re route public facility improvements (e.g. replacement
sidewalks) to retain trees. Alternatively replant trees if tree
removal is necessary consistent with City standards (RMC 4-4-
130).
C. Co mply with City surface water design manual as
appropriate.
Responsible Party: Renton Housing Authority.
Coastal Zone Management Act App ly as appropriate for a permit or certification for State
wate r quality requirements if exceeding state thresholds.
Com ply with City surface water design manual as appropriate
und e r any circumstance. Responsible Party: Renton Hou sing
Auth o rity.
Noise Abatement and Control At Co le Manor seek the highest sound transmission class
rated siding that meets capital facility needs and resources.
Resp -J nsible Party: Renton Housing Authority. (See
Attac h ment B for links to guidance documents.)
Code Authorities that Avoid Impacts:
City of Renton Municipal Code, Title IV
Chapter 4 CITY-WIDE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
4-3-050 CRITICAL AREAS REGULATIONS
4-4-030 DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES AND RE GULATIONS -GENERAL
4-4-040
4 -4 -060
4-4-070
4-4-090
4 -4 -130
FENCES, HEDGES, AND RETAINING WALLS
GRADING, EXCAVATION AND MINING REGULATIONS
LANDSCAPING
REFUSE AND RECYCLABLES STANDA RDS
TREE RETENTION AND LAND CLEARI NG REGULATIONS
Chapter 5 BUILDING AND FIRE PREVENTION STA NDARDS
Chapter 6, 4-6-030 DRAINAGE (SURFACE WAT ER) STANDARDS
Chapter 8 PERMITS -GENERAL AND APPEALS
Chapter 9 PERMITS-SPECIFIC
4-9-080 GRADING, EXCAVATION AND MINING PERMITS AND LICENSES
4-9-195 ROUTINE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PERMITS
Determination:
(8J Finding of No Significant Impact (24 CFR S8.40{g)(1); 40 CFR 1508.27]
The project will not result in a significant impact on the quality of the human environment.
D Finding of Significant Impact [24 CFR 58.40(g)(2); 40 CFR 1508.27]
The project may significantly affect the qua l ity of the human environment.
Preparer Signature: Date: August 22. 20 16
Name/Title/Organi zat i on: Manager, BERK Consu l ting
Cert i fying Officer Signature:
City of Renton Environmental Review Committee (ER , /1
/ /
Si gna tu re :--"":-«:::..J..1.-:s....:.~-"-i .... ..;.a:{:.u..LS-~~:::.k::;...::;;L--;,..·_-___,_
,)( __ \ // ~i --
Signature :~~::::::::_~:..___-_i_ _ _,J._'..___..:::::::::::====-;;;;...~-
Signature:_~:....· -,'/_..;:::.._ -=f/.,e...1/Jc:.1--=~=.:.J.'=-<C-1· .... _ ..._-___ _
.:/)
Signature: __ ..J__,_.~-------------
This original, signed document and re lated supporting material must be retained on file by the
Responsible Entity in an En v ironmental Review Record (ERR) for the actlvity/project (ref: 24 CFR Part
58.38) and in accordance with recordl<eep i ng requirements for the HUD pro grarn(s).
Attachment A. Copies of project correspondence sent to the cultural resources staff of the
Duwamish, Muckleshoot, and Snoqualmie tribes.
-------------~ -------.-----
------------------
July 15, 20 16
Duwamis h Tribe
Cec il e H ansen, Chairwo m an
4705 W Marginal Way SW
Seattle. \VA 98 10 6-1 514
Culrurn l Rcs<>urce Consulrant,
Re: Cultural Resources Assessment for t he Renion H ous ing Authorit y Project, Renton, King
Co unty, WA
D ear Cecile:
I am writing to infonn you of a cultural resources assessment for the above re ferenced proj ect
and to seek a d d iti o n a l informatio n about the project area the Tribe may have t hat is n ot readily
ava ilabl e t hrough other written sources. The project is located in R enton, Washington. B erk
Con s ulting is requesting thi s assessment o n behalf of Renton H o u s ing Authorit y. R e nton
H ousing Authority is pbrnning for capit al projects at Cole Manor (built 198 1), Eve rgreen T errace
(built 1968). and H i llcrest (bui lt 196 2-63) that will rec e ive federal fundin g fro m the Department
o f I lousi ng and Urba n Deve lopment (H U D). Th is federa l underiaking mus t comply \Vith the
National Environ mental Policy Act (NEPA) and Sect ion I 06 of the National His toric
Preserva t ion Act.
\VtJ are in the process of rev ie wing availa b le in formation. Background r esearc ll will include a
s it e files searc h a t the Was hington State De partm en t of Archaeology a nd I lis tonc Preservation.
r eview of previous ly recorded cultural re source rep orts, and re view of pert in ent published
literature and ethnograph ies . R esu lt s of our investigations will be presented ir, a technical memo.
We arc aware that n ot all informati on is conta ined wit hin published sources. S h o uld the T ribe
have additional in fo n nat io n to support our assessment , we would very much like to include it in
our study. Please contact me at so nja@crcwa.com or 360-395-8879 shou ld you wish to provide
any comments . I appreciate your ass is tance in thi s matter a nd look for,vard to hearin g from you.
Sincere ly,
Souja K assa
Projects Manager
l'O Bo x \Obb,.,:, B.-\l:"\HH.ID\,f. lSLI..Sll, \\"i\ ii,., I JO
1'110)'..:~ 2 0 tl ,'1,r,,; ~M)?O • Sl>ll_l ctip 'nt·~,·a t"ll fl l
CRC T echnical Memorandum #1605M-2
Cultural Resources Assessment, Re nton Housing Authority 2016 Capital Fac ility Program, Renton , King County, WA
Page 25
Cu I ru rn I lh·s ()u rec Cn mu l ra nr~
Julyl5,2016
tvl uck le shoot Indi an Tribe
Laura Murphy , Archac ologi su'Cultural Re sources
3901 5 17 2nd Ave SE
Auburn, WA 98092
Re: Cu ltural Resources Assessment for the Renton Ho us ing Authority Project, Renton , King
County, \VA
Dear Laura:
l am w riting to inform you of a cultura l resources assessment for the above referenced project
and to seek addit iona l infonnati on about the projec t area the Tribe may have that is not readi ly
a vailab le through other written sources. The project is located in Renton, Wash in gton. Berk
Consulting is requesting this assessment o n behalf o f Rent on Hous in g Authority. Renton
llousing Authority is planning for capital proje cts at Co le !v1anor (b uilt l 98 1 ), Evergreen Terrace
(bui lt 1968 ), and llil!c rest (bu ilt l 962-63) that will receive federa l funding fr om the Department
of Hou sing and Urban Devel opmen t (HUD). This federal und ertaking must co m ply with the
~ational Environmenta l Po li cy Act (N EP A) and Section 106 of the l\ational Hi storic
Preserva ti on Act.
\Ve are in the process of reviewing available information. 13 ac kground re se arch will include a
site files searc h at the \\/ash in gton State Department of Archaeology and Hi stori c Pre servati on ,
review of prev io usly rec ord ed c ul tural resource reports, and revi ew of pertinent published
literature and ethn og raphie s. Result s of our investigations will be prese nted in a technical memo.
We a re aware that not all infonnation is contained w ithin publishe d sources . Should the Tribe
have additional in formation to support ou r a ssess men t, we wo uld very much like to incl ude it in
our st ud y. Please contact me at sonja@crcwa .com or 360-395 -8879 should you w ish to provide
any comments. [ appreciate your assistance in this matt er and loo k forward to hearing from you .
Sincerely.
Sonja Kassa
Projects Manager
PO Ho x IOGGs, H.,1:,.;tt 100<:E ISI~\SH. \\.,\ !J.-.1 10
1'1111r-.E ',tW i.~'i'i.90.!+l -~on1a ~:n•·"·.1 .• ·o n 1
CRC Technical Memorandum #1605M-2
Cultu ra l Resources Assessment, Renton Hous ing Authority 2016 Capital Facility Program , Rento n, King County. WA
Page 26
SIAII: 0~ WASHl,\JCJON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
PO Bm 47600 • Olympia, ~'\,'!\ 98'iU..J-76/JIJ • 360-..JIF-6000
7 ff for Wa,hington RC'la> SC'n-icC' • l'C'r,olh with a ,pi·Pch di,ahilify can call l/77-l/ l.l-6 l..J1
September 15, 201 G
Ms. Vanessa Dolbee
C ity of Renton
l 055 South Grady \V::i y
Renton , Washington 98055
Re: l •cderal Consistency -Re nton J l ousing Authority Capital fund & Operating Subsidy
Proposed Activities for 20 16 -2020
Dear Ms, Dolbee:
The De paiirnent of Ecology (Ecology), Shore land s and Environmenta l Ass istance Pro gra m
received your letter regarding the use of federal funds for the proposed rehabilitation of' dwelling
units and expans ion of public fl1c ili ty impro vements on Cole \1anor, Ever.green Terrace, and
Hillcrest Terrace s ite s in th e City of Renton , King County, \\/a shington.
Ecology agrees that funding this project is consistent with Washington's Coasta l Zone
Management Program, Plea se note that this Consis tency Determination i s for th e re lease of fund s
only. Any construction a ctivities will be s ubject to ALL enforcea ble polices of the Coastal Zon e
Management Program , such as the State Environmental Policy Act (SFPA).
If yo u ha ve a ny questions rcgarrl in !1 thi.;; let te r please conta ct Jess ica Hau sma n at 360-407 -7421.
Sincerel y,
Brenden McFarland , Section Manager
Environm ental Rev ie w and Tran sportation Section
Shoreland s and Environmental Assistance Program
ecc: Li sa Gru eter , I3ERK Consulting
Jes sica Hau sman, Eco lo gy
0
STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING }
AJi~Ji'IDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
PUBLIC NOTICE
Linda M Mills , being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal
Advenising Representative of the
Renton Reporter
,l weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal news paper of
general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months
prior to the date of puhlication hereinafter referred to, published in
the English language continuously as a weekly newspaper in King
County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as
a Legal Newspaper hy order of the Superior Court of the State of
Washington for King County.
The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues
of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was
regularly distributed to its s ubscribers during the below stated period.
The annexed notice, a:
Public Notice
was publi shed on August 26, 2016.
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is
the sum of $285.63.
~~-;c:{4
v'°'Linda Mills
Legal Adve
Subsqi.qed
d;:t/t
· sing Representative, Renton Reporter
n~~rn to me thi s 26th day of August, 2016.
\
Gale Gwin, Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in
Puyallup, Washington ,,
CITY OF RENTO:\
Department o f Community and
Ec onomic Dev el o pm e nt
NOTICE OF INTENT
TO REQUEST RELF:ASE
OF Fl ·'ioS FOR
SI J\SET TERRACE
REDEVEI.OP'.\IENT
D:\T E OF NOTIC I::
:\ugust 26 . 2016
N,\MF OF RF.SPO NSIBl.f
E NTITY C it y o f Re nton
L1\ND US [ NUMI3CR
LUA 16-000630. l::CF
A I )I )R loSS · Fnvi ronmental
Review Com m ittee
Care o r Department of Corn mu-
111 ty & Eco nomic Deve lopment.
Current l'lannm g. I 0 55 South
Grady W,\. Renton . WA 98055
STAFF CONT/IC I'
Va nessa Dolbee. 425-430-72 00
PR OJECT NAME
Renton Hous 111g Aut he>rity Cari-
ta ! hmd and Orerat mg Suhs 1dy
RR O F-20 16 -2020 The.~e 1wtic-
e.l' sfra/1 mtisfr two separate but
related procedural req11ireme11ts
for activities to be u11dertake11 by
the Re11to11 Hmui11g A11tfr11rity.
REQ l!F:ST FOR RELEASE
OF Fl lNDS On or abo ut Ser-
te mbc r 13 . 2016 the C ity o f Ren-
ton will au thor ize the Re nton
Housing Aut honty to suhm1t a
request to the l JS Derartmrnt of
Hous in g and l.lrhan Dcvel orment
fo r th e release o f An nual Comn-
hut1 ons Contract Number
SF-187. /\mend mcnt Nu mber
22-l<. Grant Numb er
W/\0 I POI 150 11 6. Ca pital Fund
Program. and Operating Su bs idy
fu nd s under 24 CTR Pa rt 9 05 of
/,-
--... ., ., ..
> -"'--.. · ;-.. ::: .·· .:.._,., ~
:.. ........
11\\
,'-,, \
the lJ 11 1ted States Ho us mg Acl of
1937. Sect ion 9 . to un dertake a
pro1ect known as W/\0 11 Re nto n
I lo~si ng Authority Capital f'und
and O perating Subs idy Proposed
Activities for 201 6 2020 for the
purpo se of mainte nan ce. rehabi li-
tatio n. and o perat ion o f public
housing. at about $330.000 ann u-
a ll y for capi tal ft 111ds and up to
$642.000 ann uall, for opern tm g
s ub sidies. be tween 20 16-2020
Fl\l)f'iG OF '10 SIG'ilFI-
C,\ Yr IMPACT The Ci t\' pf
Renton ha s dete rmined th at th e
pro1ec t will haw no sig111 fi can 1
im pact on the human enviro n-
ment T he re fo re. an En vi ron-
menta l Impact Stalemelll under
the NatH mal En viro nme ntal Poli-
cy /\ct o r 1969 (~EPA ) is no t re -
quired Add1 t1 onal proj ect 1nfr>r-
rn ation is co ntai ned 111 th e Env i-
ff>n men tal Review Reco rd ( l·:R RI
on til e at the Ci ty o f Renton . De-
part ment of Com muntty & Fco-
no m ic Devciorment. l)eve lnr-
men t Serv ices . 1055 So uth firady
\Va y. Renton . WA 9805. whe re
f-.R R can he exam med and may
he e~amined or cop ied week days
8 /\ M to 5 PM
PllBLIC CO~tMF:'iTS Any
mdiv1Jual. group. or agency may
submit written com ments on the
ERR to th e Ctty o f Ren ton Envi-
ronmental Review Co mm itte e.
A II com men ts received by.
September 12. 201 6 will be con-
s idered by th e C1 tY o f Rento n
pri o r to a uth o riz ing sub1111ss 1on
of a req ues t tor release o f fiinds
Comment s sho uld spc et!\-which
J\o ti cc the y arc addrcss 111g
EN\'IRO'i'.\IENT,\ I.
(TRTIFICATION The C 1tv of
Re ntun certifies to I IUD that the
Env ironmenta l Revi ew Com mit -
tee consents to accept the JUflS·
dic ti on o f the 1:ederal Courts if
an action is hrou~hl to enforce
responsibilities m ~el ati on to the
environmental rev iew proc ess
and that the se rcs po nsibli1t1 es
have been sa ti sfied. IIUIYs ap-
proval (>f the cLTtific ati on sati,-
lic s its rc spo ns ibi l1t1e s under
J\l::l'A an d related la ws and au-
tho rities and a ll o ws the CllY of
Re nton to use Program lunds ·
OB.fF:<TIO:'liS TO RELF:ASF:
OF Fl INDS I IU D will accept
o bjecti ons to its release o f timd
and th e C itv of Rcnton·s cer11fi-
cat1on fo r a· renod o f filleen days
fo ll owing the antici pated s uhm is-
smn date or its act ual receipt of
the request t whichever is laterJ
onl y if the y arc on o ne of the fo l-
low 111c bases (ai the ccrtilicalHm
was r{ut e;.ecuted b, the Certi f, -
111g O ffi cer of the City of Rcnt o·n .
ibl the C it, of Rent on has o mit·
tcd a step or failed to make a dc-
u s1on or fi nd111g req ui red hy
ll lJ D reg ula ti ons at 24 CFR part
58 . t c ) th e grant recipient or o th-
er participants in the dcve l0 p-
111ent proce ss have co mmitted
fund s. 1 nc urred costs or underlak -
en activities not authorized bv 24
CF R Part 58 before approval· o f a
re lease o f fi.t nd s by HUD. or id )
another Federal agency actmg
pursuant to 411 C rR Part I 504
has s uhm1lled a written rind ing
that the project is unsatisfactory
from the stand poi nt o f envi ro n-
mental qua lit y O bJCCtions mus t
be pre pared and subm itted 111 ac-
cordanc e with the required rrn-
cedurcs (2 4 CF R Part 58, Sec .
58. 76) and shall be addressed to
I IU D at Seattl e Regional Office.
Sea ttle Fede ral 0111cc llu lld111 g.
Oflice of l'uhl H: I!ousin~, 909
First Av enue. Suite 360. Seattle.
W/1. 98 10 4-1000 Potent ia l ob-
jectors shou ld con ta ct Il l/[) to
vc nl'y the actual last day of the
o b)ecuon renod
Rcsponsihlc Entity Certifyini:
Officer
C1t v of Rent o n l::nvironmcntal
Re~·1ew Commi tt ee (F RC)
Date o f Dec ision
i\ ugust 22. 20 16
Dat~ o f Publi cation : Augus t 26 .
20 16 in the Re nton Repo rter
#16 790 93
I,
R~ ---~ enton ~·
NOTICE Of INTENT TO REQUEST RELEASE Of FUNDS FOR SUNSE1
TERR ACE REDEVELOPMENT
OATt Of NOllCf.:
NAM£ OF HE.Sf>orrneu fNTlTY:
LANO LI.SI: hl,JW.801:
AOORLSS:
~TAff CO NTA.CT:
PFWJfCT NAME:
tm·lranmf!iLIIR@vlil!'w (.:nmjtt,e
C.11r@ ~f: :i"~"'mrntuf Co'Tlrrun1ty Ii E<-:r,Ol'T',k Chi ~pment, Cunent ~l.11nni11
10',5 South G~:V Wiy
lo!ento,.·1,14.!.II055
llenton H:1JSii1 AJ:MI r, ~plta1 :ur>d .11nd Cper.111lnc Subiidy RROF-2016 .
in::,
11EOUEST FOR RnIA$£0F FUNDS
rlNOING m NO .SIGNlF!CANf IMl'A.CT
r,e C.ity :I ~e,t:n ~u d e termined '.h.llt tht: ?fll,l'ct wll rlavt 'l(l iltnlrlant im~Kt on the ~urr1n env,ronmuit.
H1e·et:rf!, :a., fn,.lror'lmeni,11 m~Kt Stiltem1nt JMH ~he Natlo~I ::n·o'ironment,1 Polley Aa :I 196'1 (N;:~A) I! n()t
r ~q,;lred t.<Jd llon1J crojKt lnfoMlatfon I< cont1!l'ted In the E.r~·~nrrent;r,I fl!"A1 ·"" F:K::rd (E~Rl en file .111 the <.lly of
Re,ton, Ot!1>,1nm1r r cf Comnljn,tv !Ii Ewnomk ~~kl:m@n:, ::i.-vf'lorwntot s.trw,ces. 1055 ~cuth Uri:ly 'Niy, flentor
\'JAgMo;, . .,,~,nr HIFI c•n be 1.111r,•n1d1r,.d m at bf:f'••m1r ,d01 c1.1~1dwec~dln II;.. M :o 5? M. '
PUB UC COMMfMTS
l,rt·f hld ~,du1I, 1rcJ:,, or a;e,nry m~~ subn t "'"tten ccmment1 on :,1 (R~ :o th~ d ~,' of Flento11 Err,i·cnmcnl•I ~,·.,,,w
!:ctTtTlt'l'.H. All ro·mTJl '1~1ecc1~·1dby: S1pt1rrbu 12, 'Olii .,,ijlbf!wnsld ei-edb)·the Clt'{CI F.1:nton prtcrto aJ::1:.:rll ng
lubml~s,o,., ol I rccues~ t:r r11H lt of lv,,.:it.. U::mrm:nu sfKJJ d 1c1c1'y ,.,.,le~ Norbt 1,1" art ad(ln~sii"'il
ENVlllONM£N'T41.CUtTlf1CATICN
Th• Ot,' ,;,f Fl"'1:011 url1fle1 tc MUO 11!11 the Envifl)ftmenYI Review C::mmittH ccnnM.1 ::.: 1u1:pr f~., urlu:lctloo of the
Fcdc,•I C:our-.1 il
0
1,, ac::1on is broo6ht to cnforu r e1~cns.iblt 1tu In /!llllor, ro ::11 ~nviro,.mertlll ,ev~procu.s ;ire thi:
1hen rnpon1lbl irles h•\·, been wthltf:d. HU0'1 a;i proval of r~, ccrtl'lc•tlcn uthlles 1u r u:,cr.11!:11.1~ .mc:f'r NFrA.
arr1 ,,latcU li·,.,s ,ind •uthortiu a r,d .al!ow, ttlt' CJtvof ~enlon :c 1.111: ?·c1nm f'.JnC~
OBJKTIO"IS TO RELEASE CF FUNDS
1-UO w!II a:u~l otJJ1ctlcr~ to 1t.s reluu of '\.l!ld ar.d ,..,, Ci:V o f A.t riton·, :ut1nut1on for • pc, od ol rttun di.,.,
fu! ow011g :he antkl~t@'<I \ubmlu on :!~11 or IU •ctual rK1ipt :I the rtQUeY: jwhk l'rf:\'lr ii .ierl on~f I( lhl!'f arl! on ont
L'll tht lollc:.Nll"II b.nu; [i! the U!r"Jncatlon wu l'IOt ,~eruted by 1M Ctrtl'yir,il 01rcer of :~I! Cit/ of fhn1:r: l b ) L'le Cl:'f
o l !ler,ton ~u cm,n t C:: .a ,ttp or ~lie~ to mil<e • d eci,1t1n 1Jr fnUir,g tc'1u,r1d ~~ t1UO ,,,~l•lioru •t 14 U ~ par. SA; i rl
:,1 1rilr.l r,clpi111t 01 u ther partkl~nN in ~I! d1~e oprr1nl prucus ~•v• coMmltttd funds, h:utre d co5U or
1,ndem~t n ;r~MlliM r\Ol l 'J l~of'it1d by 2• t.fll Part 58 boefore a~proval ol I relc,u al 'und5 t:-y rlUC; L'lr (di nothtr
Fe de:•I ilHl!'l:y •rtln!I puauant 10 40 c;R P1rt 1504 his 51.1bn,ttcd ii wrltt,n r,r,01n1 tl'lit the project 11 .nsa1itfa.<101"¥
l·:r, the n;i,cpalnt of en\ironm,ntal qu.al,r"j'. 0:JK"'Joni muil bf: !)t'C~il"d and ,~~m.n10 I~ il:~crd•rct" w i j't :'>e
rPqulrf'O prtlu-donu 124 C>-H F.rl S8. Sec 511,_76\ ;1,rld otha ll lw! idd;used lu ~UO at Sfl:;1,t'!II! ~111on1I Cl'l:e . ~u ttle
~cder.11 Cffice 8rnldln1,. Ol'flai ol Pu:lic -towing, 909 fin': A~·,r,u•. 5ull1 360, se~ttle. ',tJA. :13104·1000. Po tent1ill
obj1ctc·5 i,~ukl tonrKt n 1n to ·,.-nto,. rhl! 1ctu1l lut dil'f eof tM0011ctlon ofriod
Kwi poruibJ.1 E11llty C.attify1n,: Otflur
Ory c,f flemcr ~nvlror,mentill Rf'vlew LI'lrT,mlttH \[RC)
c,1, 0 ~ D«it .on: AJIUU 12, 2015
D•t1ulFLbllution.A1,1gu.t:2G,201G
t / ,I l I ..-, <: I ' v'/---,/ • I G-. C . )_/ '--:'.'..\J--~---lf...'-4_--'-•-'-,f----'-.,_._-
~/r (2/tc...0 _,:,7:LI;,£ ______ _,,<'_,fc...·7~2+/.c./e~-~
~•m1:,511nnur1
CERTIFICATION
,v;'(/;f li:, I/ M/L-f {,'~-(ereby certify that -f cop ies of the above document
w ere poste d in d._ conspicuous places or n ea rby the de sc ribed property on _
iJ /2 0 /J!)~ l, Signed f ( v Lk.(,' •Jµft'0d. fl Date: {
STATE OF WASHINGTON
) ss
COUNTY OF KING }
I certify th at I kno w or ha ve satisfactory ev idence that 1;, De c,, \ e -\.~ m vn c, r:-;;,
sig n e d this in strument and acknowledged it to be hi s/h er/th eir free and voluntary act for the
use s and purpo ses mentioned in the in strument.
''"'""''''' Dat_;....ci-!~r::B~~t,,t C..; 20( r.:,
:..-N':,,i'oft ~1~ \$' ~ .P:'~ ,, ~ ~fl o1A,t>-~, ~
:::o ~ ~ Notary (Print): lu -·-<I )2§
'-,1:;VB"'i. -uH "\ -
.,;... 111, 8 29·' .:-c, = My appointment expires: y ''1 -, .... , ..... ~ ::
/';::-
11
11111""'"' ~~ $
. OFw P..5 ,, ..... ,,,
1111"'"'''
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE REPORT
ERC MEETING DATE:
Project Name:
Proje ct Number:
Project Manager:
Owner:
Project Summary:
STAFF
RECOMMENDATION:
August 22 , 2016
Ren t o n Housing Authority Capital Fu nd and Operating Subsidy RROF-2016 -2020
LUA16 -000630, ECF
Rocale Timmons, Senior Planner
Rento n Ho u sing Authority; 2900 NE 10th St; R,en t o n, WA 9805 6
The applicant, the Renton Housing Authority (RHA), is requesting National
Envi ronmental Policy Act (NEPA) review for their proposed Capita l Fund and Operating
Subsidy activities for 20 16 through 2020. All activities rec e iving Capita l Fund Grants
and Operating Subsidies from the U.S. Department of Hous ing and U r ban Deve lopment
(HUD) are re quired to undergo review pursuant to the NEPA, consistent with HUD's
rules (24 CFR Pa rt 58). The City of Re nton is the NEPA Responsible Entity (RE) for RHA
proposals. NEPA review for RHA's proposed act ivities is being accompli she d by a sing le
program matic EA review for the pe r iod 20 16 to 2020 and is ap p lica ble to al l affected
properties in the Renton Housing Authority's port folio . The Renton Hous ing Authority
manages eight su bsid ized propertie s that are available to l ow income households or
low-income senio r or disabled ho use h olds. Exempt and non-exempt act ivit ies are
pro posed . Activit ies include: Public Housing Au thority-wide adm inistration, operations,
tec hnic al assista nce, training, fees and co sts, and d e li very of services su ch as summer
youth programs; Low Income Public Hous ing A uthority-wide maintenance includ ing
appliance replacement, non-dwelling equip m ent and tool s; Plans and designs of the
Sunset Terrace Replacement Units (prior NEPA clea rance in 2011); and ma in te nance,
Rehabilitation, and Publ ic Facility Improvement s at Hi llcrest Terrace, Everg reen Te rrace,
and Cole Manor.
Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue Notice of
Intent to Release Funds (NOI-RROF)
The City will issue a Notice of Intent to Release Funds (NOI-RROF). In the N EP A process the NOI-RROF serves as a
type of appeal process where interested parties ha ve the opport unity to object to the EIS. Sinc e the NEPA process i s
being completed for proposed redevelopmen t of Sunset Te r ra ce public housing, which is project that is a US Hous ing
and Urba n Develo p ment (HU D) project mana ged by the Re nton Ho u si ng Authority, obj ections are d i r ected to the
local HUD office. After a wa iting p e riod, if no objections are filed, t he ERC wil l be asked to issue the Request for
Release of Funds (RRO F) document to HUD.
ERC Report -RROF NOi -8.22.16
U.S. Department _. ousing and Urban
Development
451 Seventh Street, SW
Wash ington , DC 20410
www.hud.gov
espanol.hu d.gov
Environmental Assessment
Determinations and Compliance Findings for HUD-assisted Projects
24 CFR Part 58
Project Information
Project Name: WA011 Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy Proposed
Activities for 2016 -2020
Responsible Entity: City of Renton
Grant Recipient (if different than Responsible Entity): Renton Housing Authority
State/Local Identifier: WA011
Preparer : Lisa Grueter, Manager, BERK Consulting
Certifying Officer Name and Title: Mayor Denis Law and designee the Environmental Review
Committee
Grant Recipient (if different than Responsible Entity): Renton Housing Authority
Consultant (if applicable): BERK Consulting, with Cultural Resource Consultants LLC, Landau Associates,
and Weinman Consulting LLC
Direct Comments to:
Rocale Timmons
City of Renton -Current Planning
Senior Planner
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
Tel: (425) 430-7219
Fax: (425) 430-7300
r ti rnmo ns@ r e nto nwa .gov
Project Location :
See Exhibit 1 for physical locations. Sites are listed below:
• Hillcrest Terrace 1442 Hillcrest La ne NE
• Evergreen Terrace 3027 NE 15th
• Cole Manor 2811 NE 4TH
• Sunset Terrace: generally bounded by Sunset Lane NE and Glenwood Avenue NE on the north,
NE 10th Street on the east, NE Sunset Boulevard (State Route [SR] 900) on the south, and
Edmonds Avenue NE on the west
• Glennwood Townhomes 1141 & 1147 Glennwood Avenue
• Kirkland Townhomes 1508 Kirkland Ave NE
• Golden Pines Apartments 2901 NE 10th
• Cedar River Terrace 51 Burnett Street
Exhibit 1. Renton Housing Authority Properties under Evaluation
-------------·--------·----------...,._,.,..,,._
Renton Housing Authority: Subsidized Properties
~l 10th St
'·.J 4tD St
'J lrd St
.{1!11,, Cedar River
"WTemlce
211 BERK
Sou r ce : King County, City o f Renton, BER K Co nsu l t i ng 20 16
Coio Manor
C C 12.S 1) ::s
Description of the Proposed Project [24 CFR 50.12 & 58.32; 40 CFR 1508.25]:
The proposal consists of Renton Housing Authority's (RHA's) proposed Capital Fund and Operating
Subsidy activities for 2016-2020. Activities include:
• Public Housing Authority-wide administration, operations, technical assistance, training, fees
and costs, and delivery of services such as summer youth programs.
• Low Income Publi c Hou sing Authority-wide maintenance including appliance replacement, non-
dwelling equipment and tools.
• Plan s and designs of the Sunset Terrace Replacement Units (prior NEPA clearance in 2011).
• Maintenance, Rehabilitation, and Public Facility Impro veme nts at Hillcrest Terrace, Evergreen
Terrace, and Cole Manor.
See Attachment A Project Description for details.
Statement of Purpose and Need for the Proposal [40 CFR 1508.9{b)]:
The purpose and need for the proposal is the proper operation and administration of the Renton
Housing Authority and its ongoing maintenance of low income public housing units and properties, as
w ell as staff training and equipment, and programs for residents.
The rehabilitation and site improvements will increase the livability and accessibility of the dwelling
units and sites by modernizing fi xtures, remov ing asbestos containing materials, and removing ADA
barriers including replacing sidewalks and adding ramps and other improvements.
Existing Conditions and Trends [24 CFR 58.40(a)]:
Without the project, dwellings and site improvements would continue to age and reach obsolescence,
and sites would continue to be less convenient or safe to navigate for re sidents and pedestrians in the
abs ence of sidewalk replacements or accessibility improvements.
Funding Information
RHA's Grant Number is WA 19PO 1150116. Exhibit 2 and Exhib it 3 identify the capital fund grant and
operating subs idy over the 2016-2020 period .
. .. ___ E~~ibi~ 2 .. ~c1pit_al Fund Grant
Fiscal Year
. WA01P011501-16 (FY 2016)
'. Estimated 2017
' Estimated 2018
Source: US HUD District 10, Rento n Housing Author ity 2016
-~ ·--· ___ Exhibit 3. Operating Subsidy _···-············-····
i Fiscal Year Subsidy
· _ _?:Q!~----·-···-·. --·--------· -·-·----··-·--·---·-·--...... s 641,696 .
'. Est imate based on 2016 LIPH inventory 2017 $600,000
' E~timate b~sed on 2016 L.IPH _i-n~ento.ry2018 ;·$600,000 ·:
Est imate based on 2016 LIPH inventory 2019 $600,000
·:Jsii~~te b~sed ~n 2016 LIPH inventory 20~Q~~~QQi~Q_Q__j
Sou rce : US HU D District 10, Renton Housing Authority 2016
Estimated Total HUD Funded Amount:
See Exhibit 2 and Exhibit 3.
Estimated Total Project Cost (HUD and non -HUD funds) [24 CFR 58.32(d)]:
No other funds are included except HUD fund s. For the total project cost see Exhibits 1 and 2.
Compliance with 24 CFR 50.4, 58.5, and 58.6 Laws and Authorities
Reco rd below the compliance or conformance determinations for each statute, execu ti ve order, or
regulation. Provide credible, traceable, and supportive source documentation for each authority. Where
applicab le, comp lete the necessary reviews or consu ltations and obtai n or note applicable permits of
approvals. Clearly note citations, dates/names/titles of contacts, and page references . Attach additional
documentation as appropriate.
Compliance Factors: Statutes, Are formal Compliance determinations
Executive Orders, and comp lia nce
Regulations listed at 24 CFR steps or
§58.5 and §58.6 mitigation
required?
STATUTES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, AND REGULATIONS LISTED AT 24 CFR 50.4 and 58.6
Airport Hazards Yes No No sites are in the Runway Protection Zone or
D [g] Acc ident Potential Zone.
24 CFR Part 51 Subpart D The Cedar River Terrace site is located outside
the area where height restrictions apply per FAR
Part 77 of Renton Municipal Airport. It is located
in the Traffic Pattern Zone (6); future
development is sub ject to review and potential
conditions regarding density, notice on titles,
and other provisions. No new units or
development are proposed on the subject site.
See RMC 4 -3-020 Airport Related Height and
Use Restrictions. See worksheet in Attachment
Compliance Factors: Statutes, Are formal Compliance determinations
Executive Orders, and compliance
Regulations li sted at 24 CFR steps or
§58.5 and §58.6 mitigation
required?
B, RM C 4-3-020 Airport Related Height And Use
Restrictions, and detailed height map Re nto n
M un i ci12 al Ai r 12 ort Build ing Height Res tri ctio ns.
Coastal Barrier Resources Yes No Not appl icable. Renton is not located on the
D cg] marine coast.
Coastal Barrier Resources Act, as
amended by the Coastal Barrier
Improvement Act of 1990 [16
USC 3501)
Flood Insurance Yes No The Cedar River Terrace site is located in the
D cg] 500-year floodplain but no cr itical actions are
Flood Disaster Protection Act of proposed; physical act ivities are limited to
1973 and National Flood maintenance. See works hee t in Attachment B
Insurance Reform Act of 1994 [42 and map illustrating Zo n e X fl oo d12l a in bo u nd ary
USC 4001-4128 and 42 USC (500 year floodplain).
5154a]
STATUTES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, AND REGULATIONS LISTED AT 24 CFR 50.4 & 58.5
Clean Air Yes No Th e Pu ge t So u nd regio n is co nsid e r ed a
cg] D mai nten anc e a re a, a nd is not d es ig nate d a no n-
Clean Air Act, as amended, atta i n me nt a r ea. City o f Re nto n reg ulati o n s
particularly section 176(c) & (ct); regarding construction apply and address dust
40 CFR Parts 6, 51, 93 and other matters; additional best management
practices are recommended to control dust. No
operational increases in traffic trips are
anticipated as no dwellings are added. Puget
So und Clean Air Agency rules on Asbes t os
Control St an da r ds apply.
Coastal Zone Management Yes No The project is with in the Washington coastal
cg] D zone management area. The City of Renton
Coastal Zone Management Act, submitted its request for consistency
sections 307(c) & (ct) determination to the Washington State
Department of Ecology (Ecology). See
Attachment C Department of Ecology
determination of consistency letter to City of
Renton.
Contamination and Toxic Yes No This review found no evidence of known or
Substances cg] D suspected contamination at any of the three
properties. Therefore, no additional
24 CFR Part 50.3(i) & 58.5(i)(2) investigation is warranted based on the project
Compliance Factors: Statutes, Are formal Compliance determinations
Executive Orders, and comp liance
Regulations listed at 24 CFR steps or
§58.5 and §58.6 mitigation
required?
as defined, and the information reviewed .
However, if evidence of potential contamination
is identified during project planning or
execution, procedures shou ld be implemented
for sampling and analysis to evaluate the
suspect material and provide for appropriate
handling and disposal of the material to ensure
protection of human health and the
environment. See Attachment B including EDR
report excerpts. Full EDR reports for the three
sites whe re exterior site alterations are
proposed (Hi llcrest Terrace, Evergreen Terrace,
and Cole Manor) are available with the
Environmental Review Record.
Endangered Species Yes No The capital and operating subsidy projects
[2J D considered in 2016 for Hillcrest Terra ce,
Endangered Species Act of 1973, Evergreen Terrace , and Cole Manor are not
particularly section 7; 50 CFR anticipated to result in increased runoff beyond
Part 402 current conditions and wou ld not have the
potential to change pollutant loading relative to
current conditions due to: application of surface
water and aquifer protection standards in the
Renton Municipal Code, no net increase in
impervious area, and no new impervious
surfaces accessible to vehicular traffic.
Therefore no effect to listed fish species is
anticipated. Based on a review of the
Washington Department of Fish and Wi ldlife's
Priority Habitats and Species database no listed
wildl ife species o r critical habitat are found on
the subject sites.
Explosive and Flammable Yes No There are no above ground stora ge tanks within
Hazards D [2J 1 mile of the sites where rehabilitation is
proposed. See Attachment B in cluding EDR
24 CFR Part 51 Subpart C report excerpts. Full EDR reports for the three
sites where exterior site a lterations are
proposed (Hillcrest Terrace, Evergreen Terrace,
and Cole Manor) are avai lable wit h the
Env ironmental Review Record.
Compliance Factors: Statutes, Are formal Compliance determinations
Executive Orders, and compliance
Regulations listed at 24 CFR steps or
§58.5 and §58.6 mitigation
required?
Farmlands Protection Yes No Not applicable. Sites are already developed for
D ~ urban use. See Attachment B.
Farmland Protection Policy Act of
1981, particularly sections
1504(b) and 1541; 7 CFR Part 658
Floodplain Management Yes No The Cedar Ri ver Terrace site is located in the
D ~ 500 -year floodplain but no critical actions are
Executive Order 11988, proposed. See worksheet in Attachment Band
particularly section 2(a); 24 CFR map illustrating Zone X floodr;ilain boundar~
Part 55 (500 year floodplain).
Historic Preservation Yes No The project will not affect any previously
~ D recorded historic properties. See Attachment D.
National Historic Preservation None of the proposed activities at Cole Manor
Act of 1966, particularly sections and Hillcrest Terrace, nor the addition of the
106 and 110; 36 CFR Part 800 garbage recycling station at Hillcrest in March
2016, will affect aboveground historic
properties. The Evergreen Terrace facility, built
in 1968, was identified by DAHP as over 45 years
in age and in need of review at the EZ-2 level. A
short report form was provided to DAHP, and
DAHP found that no historic properties will be
affected by the current project as propose d in
correspondence dated August 4, 2016.
Compliance Factors: Statutes, Are formal Compliance determinations
Executive Orders, and compliance
Regulations listed at 24 CFR steps or
§58.5 and §58.6 mitigation
required?
Noise Abatement and Control Yes No Evergreen Terrace and Cole Manor are within
r8J D 1,000 feet of principal arteri als ..
Noise Control Act of 1972, as
amended by the Quiet Evergreen Terrace at its closest point is about
Communities Act of 1978; 24 CFR 285 feet from the SR 900 centerline, and Cole
Part 51 Subpart B Manor is about 88 feet from the NE 3 rd Street
ce nterline west of Jefferson Avenue NE.
Using HUD's online tool, noise levels are
acceptable for Evergreen Terrace (not exceeding
65 db). No mitigation is needed.
Cole Manor is above 65 dB but not exceeding 70
dB, considered norm ally unacceptable for new
construction; attenuation is encouraged for
m ode rnization. New construction of dwellings is
not proposed.
Since new concrete board siding is proposed
between the eaves and current brick fa~ade, it is
recommended that the highest so und
transmission class (STC) rated board that meets
the capital program needs and resources be
applied.
Sole Source Aquifers Yes No Cole Manor is located in the Cedar Valley sole
r8J D source aquifer; see Ced a r Valley 2 map. The
Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, project is not likely to affect Sole Source Aquifer
as amended, particularly section quality. Sizes of residential structures will stay
1424(e); 40 CFR Part 149 the sa me . Sizes of public facilities may slightly
expand impervious area (e.g. ADA
improvements). It is anticipated that sidewalk
replacements will be pervious leading to no-net-
increase in impervious area. Improvements are
subject to the City's aquifer protection
regulations and surface water design manual,
cons ist of non-pollutant ge nerating surfaces,
and are in locations served by public water,
sewer, and storm drainage systems.
Wetlands Protection Yes No There are no known wetlands on subject
D r8J properties. See Attachment Band Wetlands and
Exe cu tive Order 11990, Water Classificat ions map.
Compliance Factors: Statutes, Are formal Compliance determinations
Executive Orders, and compliance
Regulations li sted at 24 CFR steps or
§58.5 and §58.6 mitigation
required?
particularly sections 2 and 5
Wild and Scenic Rivers None of the project sites are w ithin proximity of
Yes No a Wild and Scenic River, based on a review of
Wild and Sce nic Rivers Act of D [8J Nat io n al Pa rk Se r vice inform at ion for
1968, particularly section 7(b) Was hi ng t o n St a te.
and (c)
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE
Environmental Justice Yes No Proposed rehabilitation will improve the quality
D [8J of the indoor environment for residents (e.g.
Executive Order 12898 removal of asbestos containing material), and
wi ll also improve access for e lderly and disabled
residents (e.g. ADA improvements). No adverse
environmental impacts are anticipated.
Environmental Assessment Factors [24 CFR 58 .40; Ref. 40 CFR 1508.8 &1508.27] Recorded below is the
qualitative and quantitative significance of the effects of the proposal on the characte r , features and
resources of the project area. Each factor has been evalua ted and documented, as appropriate and in
proportion to its relevance to the proposed act ion. Verifiable source documentation has been provided
and described in support of each determination, as appropriate. Credible, traceable and support ive
source documentation for each authority has been provided. Where appl ic able, the necessary reviews
or consultations h ave been completed and applicable permits of approvals have been obta ined or
noted. Citations, dates/names/titles of contacts, and page references are clea r. Add itional
documentation is attached, as appropriate. All conditions, attenuation or mitigation measures have
been clearly identified.
Impact Codes: Use an impact code from the following list to make the determination of impact for each
factor.
(1) Minor beneficial impact
(2) No i mpact anticipated
(3) Minor Adverse Impact-May require mitigation
(4) Significant or potentially significant impact requiring avoidance o r modification which may require
an Environmental Impact Statement
Environmental Impact
Assessment Factor Code Impact Evaluation
LAND DEVELOPMENT
Conformance with 2 here wil l be no change in use of the subject sites; all are zone d
Plans/ Compatible for residential or mixed use/ residential-commercial purposes.
Land Use and Zoning/ • Hillcrest Terrace 1442 Hillcrest Lane NE: R-14
Scale and Urban • Evergreen Terrace 3027 NE 151
h : Center Village
Design • Cole Manor 2811 NE 4T H: RM-F
• Sunset Terrace, SR 900: Center Vi lla ge
• Cedar River Terrace 51 Burnett Street: Center Downtown
• Glennwood Townhomes 1141 & 1147 Glennwood
Avenue: R-14
• Golden Pines Apartments 2901 NE 101h : Center Vil lage
• Kirkland Townhomes 1508 Kirkland Ave NE : R-14
Proposed capital projects would be compatible with the sca le
and pattern of existing land use.
Soil Suitability/ Slope/ ISome areas of steep slopes are mapped on the Hillcrest Terrace
Erosion/ Drainage/ 2 land Evergreen Terrace sites. Moderate landslides are mapped in
Storm Water Runoff he Evergreen Terrace area. Stormwater systems serve all sites
under review. See maps: Erosion Hazard , Landslide Hazard , Steep
~ and Storm Wate r. Where site disturbance is proposed for
ADA improvements, sidewalk replacements, and similar exterior
activities, the application of City regulations for crit ica l areas,
grad ing and erosion control, stormwater, landscaping, and
related standards in Renton Municipal code Title IV will address
any potential impacts. (See list under Mitigation Measures and
:onditions below.)
Hazards and 3 See Contamination and Toxic Substances and Noise Ab atement
Nuisances above. With proposed mitigation, no impacts are anticipated .
including Site Safety
and Noise
Energy Consumption 1 Some maintenance and rehabilitation includes implementation
of energy saving light bulbs.
Environmental Impact
Assessment Factor Code Impact Evaluation
SOCIOECONOMIC
Employment and 2 No implementation of economic uses and no displacement of
Income Patterns businesses would occur.
Demographic 2 Units w ill be r ehabilitated when vacated and made ready for
Character Changes, new tenants. No displacement would occur.
Displacement
Environmental Impact
As sessment Factor Code Impact Evaluation
COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES
Educational and 2 No facilities of this type will be added or displaced .
Cultural Facilities
Commercial Facilities 2 No facilities of this type will be added or displaced.
Health Care and Social 1 Summer youth programs are proposed for funding.
Services
Solid Waste Disposal/ 2 ~ny construction will follow proper solid waste disposal per City
Recycling todes (RMC 8-1). At Hillcrest Terrace and Cole Manor, collection
~nd storage of solid waste will be more efficient.
Waste Water/ 2 ~II sites are served by sewers; no change in numbers of dwelling
Sanitary Sewers units is proposed and no impacts are anticipated.
ISee: Wastewa ter.
Water Supply 2 All sites are served by the City's water system; no change in
numbers of dwelling units is proposed and no impacts are
anticipated. See: Dri nki ng Water.
Public Safety -Police, 2 All sites are served by the City's police and fire departments; no
Fire and Emergency change in numbers of dwelling units is proposed and no impacts
Medical are anticipated. See: Fire Station Respon se Areas, and Po lice
Dena rtme nt Pa t rol Areas .
Parks, Open Space 2 Sites are served by the Renton Parks system. No change in
and Recreation numbers of dwelling units is proposed and no impacts are
anticipated. It should be noted that a central park is to be added
at Sunset Terrace, expanding and consolidating park area in the
wicinity. See: Re nton Trails and Bikewats Guide including parks .
Transportation and 1 5ites are served by local and state roads (see Arterials); no
Accessibility dwellings are added and no increases in daily traffic are
!anticipated. Onsite ADA and sidewalk improvements will
improve accessibility by the disabled and elderly.
Environmental Impact
Assessment Factor Code Impact Evaluation
NATURAL FEATURES
Unique Natural 2 rThere are no onsite unique natural features. Water resources
Features, will be protected by the nature of the proposals (e.g. replacing
Water Resources sidewalks with pervious materials) and application of City
stormwater requirements where applicable.
Vegetation, Wildlife 2 See endangered species above.
Other Factors 2 None.
Additional Studies Performed:
List of Attachments:
A. Project Description
B. Checklists Regarding 24 CFR 50.4, 58.5, and 58.6 Laws and Authorities
C. Department of Ecology Coastal Zone Management Determination of Consistency Letter
D. Cultural Resources Assessment for the Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capital Facility Program ,
Renton, King County, WA, Technical Memo, August 4, 2016, including Department of
Arc haeology and Historic Preservation Letter, No Historic Properties Affected, August 4, 2016
Field Inspection (Date and completed by):
No field investigation was conducted. Sites were reviewed by aerial photos in Google Earth.
List of Sources, Agencies and Persons Consulted (40 CFR 1 5D8 .9(b )J:
Agencies:
Washington Department of Ecolo gy, Coastal Zone Management (see Attachment C)
Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (see Attachment D)
Duwamish Tribe (see Attachment D)
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (se e Attachment D)
Snoqualmie Indian Tribe (see Attachment D)
Renton Housing Authority, Mark Gropper, Sean McCarty
Schemata, Grace Kim, Guy Thom sen
Sources and Additional Resources Used:
See Attachment B regarding sources addressing 24 CFR 50.4, 58.5, and 58.6 Laws and Authorities.
Ctty of Renton Map Gallery
Airport Area Elevations -South
Aquifer Protection
Arterials
Drinking Water
Erosion Hazard
Fire Station Response Areas
Flood Haza rd
Landsl!Q.~ __ Hazard
Police Department Patrol Areas
Renton Trails and Bikeway5_Guide
Steep Slo~
Storm_Water
Wastewater
Wetlands and Water Classifications
Zoning
Envtronmcntal Protection Agency.-Sole Source Aquifer Maps: Cgda r Va I ley 2
King County iMap: http://www.kingcounty.gov/services/gis/Maps/imap.aspx
WSDOT -Fr eight and Goods: http://wsdot.maps.arcgis.com/home/index.html
WSDOT Community Planning Portal: http://wsdot.maps.arcgis.com/home/index.html
List of Permits Obtained:
The Hillcrest solid waste enclosure has received a Renton Building Permit. See Attachment B.
Requested clearances:
• Washington Department of Ecology: Certification of Consistency with Washington's Coastal
Zone Management Program for Federally Funded Activities (See Attachment C)
• Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation letter, No Historic Properties Affected,
August 4, 2016 (see Attachment D}
Programmatic maintenance and rehabilitation activities are subject to permits, including, but not limited
to:
• City of Renton building permits
• City of Renton Grading permits
• City of Renton Routine Vegetation Management Permits
• Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Asbestos /Demolition Notification Forms
As presented capital and operating subsidy activities are exempt from SEPA under these rules:
• WAC 197-11-800 (1) Minor new construction , (2) Other minor new construction, (3} Repair,
remodeling and maintenance activities, (6) Land use decisions, (14) Activities of agencies, (15)
Financial assistance grants, and other relevant subsections of WAC 197-11-800.
• City SEPA rules in RMC 4-9 -070, including but not limited to: RMC 4-9-070.G.1.b which exempts
"landfills and exca v ations in WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(v): Up to five hundred (500) cubic yards or
less."
Should grading or improvements or other activities exceed these thresholds, SEPA clearances will be
required.
Public Outreach [24 CFR 50.23 & 58.43]:
A FONSI will be published in accordance with 24 CFR 58.43 -Dissemination and/or publication of the
findings of no significant impact. Accordingly a 15-day comment period will be held.
Cumulative Impact Analysis [24 CFR 58.32]:
This En v ironmental Assessment has addressed the programs and activities of a 5-year capital facility
plan and operating subsidy, aggregating a number of exempt, categorically excluded, and other activities
subject to evaluation.
Alternatives [24 CFR 58.40(e); 40 CFR 1508.9]
The programmatic capital and operating proposals reflect categories of activities to meet federal, state,
and local requirements and meet the needs of residents to maintain properties, improve accessibility
under the ADA, remove obsolescent facilities and appliances, and remove hazards (asbestos containing
m aterials).
The proposal does not involve unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of available resources.
Nevertheless, for the purposes of this evaluation, alternatives to exterior building alterations include:
different siding materials than concrete board. The primary objective is to reside Cole Manor due to
protect dwellings from the weather. Should a different material be appropriate to meet the objectives,
it may be considered.
The following alternatives are identified for site improvements:
• Removing or relocating sidewalks instead of replacing them
• Moving solid waste facilities to other site locations
• Removing or relocating fencing instead of replacing it
Current sidewalks are buckling or in disrepair. Removing the sidewalks could remove hazardous
conditions if they exist, but would not improve accessibility. Sidewalks are generally in locations where
usage is desired; wholesale relocation may not provide comparable efficient access. However, under the
proposal minor rerouting of sidewalks to avoid trees may occur when replacing the sidewalks.
Solid waste facilities are generally found in central locations for both residents and solid waste service
providers who regularly collect the waste. Relocating them rather than replacing them could mean
adding impervious areas in new locations rather than making use of current disturbed areas.
Removing fencing could make sites less secure in terms of uninvited visitors; r e locating fencing may
disturb new areas compared to replacing fencing.
No Action Alternative [24 CFR 58.40(e)]:
Under a No Action Alternative, maintenance, rehabilitation, and site improvements would not be
implemented. Without the project, dwellings and site improvements would continue to age and reach
obsolescence, and sites would continue to be less easy to navigate in the absence of sidewalk
replacements or accessibility improvements.
Summary of Findings and Conclusions:
The proposals as designed and conditioned will not adversely impact natural or built environment
conditions. Activities are compatible with the existing uses in the area. The proposed project also w ill
not adversely impact existing resources or services in the area.
Mitigation Measures and Conditions [40 CFR 1sos.2(c)]
Summarize below all mitigation measures adopted by the Responsible Entity to reduce, avoid, or
eliminate adverse environmental impacts and to avoid non -compliance or non-conformance with the
above -listed authorities and factors. These measures/conditions must be incorporated into project
contracts, development agreements, and other relevant documents. The staff responsible for
implement ing and monitoring mitigation measures should be clearly identified in the mitig ation plan.
Mitigation Measures and Conditions
Law, Authority, or Factor
Clean Air
Contamination & Toxic Substances
Historic Preservation
Endangered Species, Surface Water,
Mitigation Measure
Comply with Pu get Sound Clean Air Agency rules on Asbestos
Control Standa rds . Responsib le Party: Contractors.
The City sha ll require all construction contractors to
implement air quality control plans for construction activities
in the project area. The air quality control plans shou ld
include best management practices to control fugitive dust
and odors emitted by diesel construction equipment.
The following BMPs wi ll be used to control fugitive dust.
• Use water sprays or other non-toxic dust control
methods on unpaved roadways.
• Minimize veh icle speed while traveling on unpaved
surfaces.
• Prevent trackout of mud onto public streets.
• Cover so il piles when practical.
Minimize work during periods of high winds when practical.
The following mitigation measures will be used to minimize
air quality and odo r issues caused by tailpipe emissions.
• Maintain the engines of construction equipment
according to manufacturers' specifications.
• Minimize idling of equipment while the equipment is
not in use.
Responsible Party: City of Renton and Contractors.
No impacts are anticipated, but if evidence of potential
contamination is identified during project planning or
execution, procedures should be implemented for sampling
and analysis to evaluate the suspect material and provide for
appropriate handling and disposal of the material to ensure
protection of human health and the environment.
Re sponsible Party, Contractors.
No impacts to archaeo logical resources are anticipated. In the
event that ground disturbing or other activities do result in
the inadvertent discovery of archaeological deposits, work
should be halted in the immediate area and contact made
with DAHP in Olympia. Work should be halted until such time
as further investigation and appropriate consu ltation is
concluded. In the unlikely event of the inadvertent discovery
of human remains, work should be immediately halted in the
area, the discovery covered and secured against further
disturbance, and contact effected with law enforcement
personnel. Responsible Party, Contractors.
A. Use pervious materials to replace sidewalks to offset any
Law, Authority, or Factor Mitigation Measure
and Aquifer Protection Zones added impervious areas for public facility or site
improvements (e.g. solid waste enclosures or ADA
improvements), to achieve no-net-increase in site impervious
areas. Alternatively, implement best management practices
that achieve low impact development objectives and the
surface water design manual standards.
B. Reroute public facility improvements (e.g. replace ment
sidewalks} to retain trees. Alternatively replant trees if tree
removal is necessary consistent with City standards {RMC 4-4-
130).
C. Comply with City surface wa ter design manual as
appropriate.
Responsible Party: Renton Housing Authority.
Coastal Zone Management Act Apply as appropriate for a permit or certification for State
water quality requirements if exceeding state thresholds.
Comply with City surface water design manual as appropriate
under any circumstance. Responsible Party: Renton Housing
Authority.
Noise Abatement and Control At Cole Manor seek the highest sound transmission class
rated siding that meets ca pital facility needs and resources.
Responsible Party: Renton Housing Authority. {See
Attachment B for links to guidance documents.)
Code Authorities that Avoid Impacts:
City of Renton Municipal Code, Title IV
Chapter 4 CITY-WIDE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
4 -3-050 CRITICAL AREAS REGULATIONS
4 -4-030 DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS -GENERAL
4-4-040 FENC ES, HEDGES, A ND RETAINING WALLS
4-4-060 GRADING , EXCAVATION AND MINING REGULATIONS
4-4-070 LANDSCAPING
4-4-090 REFUSE AND RECYCLABLES STANDARDS
4-4-130 TREE RETENTION AND LAND CLEARING REGULATIONS
Chapter 5 BUILDING AND FIRE PREVENTION STANDARDS
Chapter 6, 4-6-030 DRAINAGE (SURF ACE WATER) STANDARDS
Chapter 8 PERMITS -GENERAL AND APPEALS
Chapter 9 PERMITS -SPECIFIC
Determination:
[8J Finding of No Significant Impact [24 CFR 58.40(g)(1); 40 CFR 1508.27]
The project will not result in a significant impact on the quality of the hum a n environment.
D Finding of Significant Impact [24 CFR 58.40(g)(2); 40 CFR 1508.27]
The project may significantly affect the quality of the human environment.
Preparer Signature:
' .( \" ___ ./) t. _j,,c (
Date:
Name/Title/Organization: Manager, BERK Consulting
Certifying Officer Signature:
City of Renton Environmental Review Committee (ER
Date:
August 22, 2016
Signature:__..:0.~::.=.~~:...___...~~-==========;;;;,,..~~
Signature:_-"-t(p __ ,/=..c. {2~ --L..:~=..:..c++:....::'-L...-'........__-___ _
~,·
Signature: __ -+-_.___._ ___________ _
This original, sig ned document and related supporting material must be retained on file by the
Responsible Entity in an Environmental Review Record (ERR) for the activity/project (ref: 24 CFR Part
58.38) a nd in accordance with recordkeeping requirements for the HUD program(s).
Coastal Zone Management-Washi ngton State
Gea enil r e ui r ement3 _______ .l Legislation : Regulatioa ~
Ensure that projects are consistenl I Co~tal Zone Management Act , 15 CFR Part 910 !
Cbttk.Ust fo r HUD oi:_~espo D.Si l>le Entitv
wi th the Washington Coastal Zo~ I !6 li-S.C. 1451-1464 I
Mana gement Procram --. .. ----------·----
J. ls the pn,jttt toc:ated in Callam, Gray, Harbor, b land, Jdft:non, Kini, Kimp, M-n.. Padlk, Piecn,
San Juan, Sbgit, Snohomish, Tbnnton, Wahklakllm o r Wbattom Couode$?
0 No: Stop be=. The CZM rMew is complete. Rccoro your detmninatioo on I.be EA. Statutory Wori:shttt
or HlJD Form 4128 .
~ Yes: PROCEED to #2 h , • , ,:-,,, .
2. [! t be project !oulffl OD friba.l tru!t laisdJ?
0 Yes: Tribal Trust land is e-<cludcrl from the state coosu.1 w~. Proceed to II).
!BJ t-:o : PROCf.ED lo lt4
3. Will tM project impact the (1)8su.l ZOllf! beyond the u cluded tribal trust I.a-Gd. for e.umpk t.b.ruug.h
watff runoff from lncrefled lmjU'n 1ou, su rfa«s, or Increased sedimen t loa ds la watrrbodics?
C8j Yes : PROCEED to #4
0 No : Tbc Coasul Zooe Manegemeot rniew is complete. Document Llat your project will have no impact oo
coastal zones owsidc of the excluded tribal crust land Record your detennimujon on the Statutory Won.sheet ,
E.o,ironmental Assessment form or HUD Fann 4128 .
~-Does the proj«:t Include u-ronstructioa. or m11jor rel11biliuti11n or ex.lstillg stn11:tL1.res? Major
rehabilitation r:neam woo.: that exc=b !ht calrg<)rical cxch1sion threshold at 24 CfR Pan 5S .35{a) and lh=:foce
requires a full Ell~-ironrnemal Ass=t
0 No: STOP here. Toe Costal Zone Management revJCW is complete.
C8) Yes : PROCEED to #4
• Complete the e.ttacbcd WCatificntioo ofCoo.siStcncy v.1th Wa.sningum's Coastal Zone Managffl!Cl1
Proi.,-am." and ~:od 1110 lhe Departmcllt of Ecology (DOE} at the foUowing address · Fedm.l Consistency
Coord.inatO£, Sbon:lin.cs & Environ=u.l A»istance Program, Depact=m of Ecology, P.O Box 47690.
Olympia., WA 98.504--7690 1elcpbouc number. (360) 4-07~ or email it
~~fe.dperuutsia.ccv.W1Lgo, Be sure to identify !he Federal Program. i.e . CDBG, Section 202, SHOP ,
de. The Appliaml is HUD or the Responsible Entity. The first certification oo the fomi should be signed
by the lender or oon-profit orp.nization that i5 developing lhc project. HUD (under Patt 50) or the
responsible entity ( under Patt 5&) signs the dcu:rminat100 that the action will OOC. affect coastal resources
(once it has bero dct~ that the prt>jttt will comply with all c:niorceablc policies of the CZ\{
Program). Ecology has 6 mootlu :o concur with a ~termination, however, they often do so v.;lh:in two
weeks i hll of the information 1s submitted.
r8J Yes : STOP here.. Toe C03$1lll Zone Management Review 15 complete O Yoo should ha~ a mechanism in
place \1.e . condition to the contnct or FIRM Commitment) 10 as.sure the recipient has comp~erl all actioos
prior to n:lasi-ng fund! Atueh a copy of the Ccnifr.:arfon !11\d ConsiS1ency dciaminaoon. Record your
dcicrnunation on the EA, S1atu1.0ry W oricshcct or 4 12.8.
0 No: U lhe project wlU Dot comply i.·UJ all eaforc:nbh! polides a., e utlioed on the CertificstioB of
Consi.rtrncy, l'l'llrk with lkpa.ffl!Ma( of EcoloJo, lo mitigate wues. Do 00( iaJtitt.e the P'n>ject ontll
CZM !uu bttn m1tigatrd..
DISCLAIMER: This document is 111tended as a toot to help HUD
Rc-gi-0n X grantct:s and HUD staff complete NEPA requirements. This
document is subject to change. This is not a policy stat~nt.. and the
Coastal Zone Management Legislation and Rcgula!ioll5 lake
precedence O\er any in formal.ion found io this document.
llliO Rc~on X Eoviroomcnta! Oil'c: Mm:h 20l~
CERTIFICATION OF CONSISTENCY WITH WASHlNGTo~·s
COAST AL ZONE MANAGEME.!111 PROGRAM FOR
FEDERALLY FUNDED ACTIVITIES
Fnier11I Apptintio• Nunber
AppllC111t: _____ _
(an:acb SIie plllm. locsti!>O (COUJJI'}' Qty), and proxitniry to wata body (nrum::)).
This action wma CZMA§307(c)(3) u for a project. whict. will t.a.k~ plaa: ,,.,tJu11 WashiDgtoo's c04SUI zoo,,, or wbi<:h will
affect a ilmd u,c, water use, OI' nstural == of the coa!ml zone. (The C04Jlal zone inclwies Oallam. Gr-ay.r Harbor,
/slt>lld. JgfcrSD11. Kutg, Kitsap. M.::.son. Paafk. Pintt, Sa,, Ju..."!f., Sitigu, Sn/Jflomuh . 71ntn1011 , Wahhabun and l».atcom
counties J
The project complies wrtb the foUo·..;ng cnfon:cablc poi~• of tbc C~tal Zone Management Program
(C"hcd, the boJ. d=nbm~ the current sucus of eacb poti.:v)
I Stnt, rcqalrcmmu han brn met Addilio&:1al l.nro mcu.t bt obt.al.otd I ' I prior lo 11hnla! laltbtiu
Doc, oat I Ha! recci ,·ed Ha:i a v.iid Ha.s oppli~d for I Will >1pply 11:1
' ruJW'C a l an CJ.emption permit or a permit or : appropriate for a I I E.iuorcnblc Polkie, . Cfllfic:ioon cen,fication c=fiomon 1 permit or
or p.-nni.l f ccrri6cation I
I
j I. Sb11~ MuqNDt•I Act ••
I I
! ! ! I Z. State Watu Qaallty !
Rc-qu~mmts: ' j a . Water Quilty !
I I b. Storm,.attr
I I 3. State Air Qu.li ry Rtquircmcats I
i I
14. State EiuiroomcotaJ f'oiky Ac1 : SEPA Lead Agi::1C')" is.
l I ()
I
Project will compl) ,.;th SEP.a. ()
SEP A c.betlilin S11bmitted () date
;SEPA decision ~l~cd ( )DNS ( )MD:'-/S ( )EIS ( )01.h-r dale
I ( )SEPA # date
0 Public Noti~e muse be provided if the project is ft'ithin the waler or within 200 feet or a Sborellne
Management Act waler body.
Publk Noti~ h rcqalrM rar tlle pr•pc>Kd projccl? No Ye, (ldcn1ify -tbod below)
( )noucc anatled IO inu:resicd parties using :1a1ltng hst oa (d.rle}
( )publlC3lioo m (newspaper) on (dAtes)
( )olh.:r (d:i1cs 1rpubl1c r.o n cc s rcqum:c and you h:1,e not pro,idcu ,i.. CZ!l.1
stll[h,·ill publish die ooticc. You= llOl inmate tr.e project until )oo have bc:::n nonf:cd by CZ..~.
HUD Rc~ton X Envtmnmcnt.:11 Office \hn::h )()IJ
l
!
l
'
I
I
I
IIUD or Rc,ipoo'1bk E.111ity DUU form to;
, Fedctd Consisuncy CoordmalM
Shorelines & Environmental Assistance Program
Ocp:utmcnt of E.coio&Y
P.O . Box -17600
Olymp!A, WA 985-04
Email : ecyrefedpermiu. · ~.wa_gov
Phone: {360) 407-6068
-Dfpartmnt ofE.c;logy pk2tt mall DcttrnU112&.11 of
' Coosi:ste.ncy to: {lndudr Plin~ 114mhtt o( c:o11uct)
=4JII,¢ CIT Y OF ~ ------~Re.1.1 ton ~
NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST RELEASE OF FUNDS FOR SUNSET
TERRACE REDEVELOPMENT
DATE OF NOTICE:
NAME OF RESPONSIBLE ENTITY :
LAND USE NUMBER:
ADDRESS :
STAFF CONTACT:
PROJECT NAME:
Augu st 26, 2016
City of Renton
LUA16-000630, ECF
Environmental Review Comm ittee
Care of: Department of Community & Economic Development, Current Planning
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Vanessa Do lbe e, 425-430-7200
Renton Hou sing Authority Capital Fund and Ope rating Subs i dy RROF -2016 -
2020
These notices shall satisfy two separate but related procedural requirements far activities to b e undertaken b y the
Renton Housing Authority.
REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS
On or about Sep t ember 13, 2016 the City of Renton w i l l authori ze the Ren ton Housing Authority to submit a reque st to
the US Department of Housing and Urban Development for the relea se of Annua l Contri bution s Contract Num ber SF -
187, Amendment Number 22-N, Grant Number WA01P01150116, Cap ital Fund Program, and Ope rating Subsidy funds
under 24 CF R Part 905 of the United States Hous ing Act of 1937, Sect ion 9, to underta ke a project known as WAOll
Renton Housing Authority Capita l Fund and Operating Subs idy Pro posed Activitie s for 2016 -2020 for the purpose of
mai ntenance, rehabi li tation , and operation of public housi ng, at about $330,000 annually for cap ital fu nds and up to
$642,000 an nually fo r operating subsidies, between 2016-2020 .
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
The City of Renton has determined that th e project will have no significant im pact on the human environment.
Therefo re, an Environmental Impac t Statement und er the Nationa l Environm enta l Po licy Ac t of 1969 (NEPA) is not
required. Ad ditional project i nform ation is contained in the Environmental Review Reco rd (ER R) on fi le at the City of
Renton, Department of Community & Economic Development, Development Serv ice s, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,
WA 9805, w here ERR can be exam ined and m ay be exam i ned or cop ied weekdays 8 A.M to 5 P.M.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any in dividual, group, or agency may su bm it written com ments on the ERR to the Ci ty of Renton Envi ronmenta l Revi ew
Committee. All comments received by: Sept ember 12, 2016 w ill be conside r ed by the City of Renton prior to authorizing
submission of a request for release of fu nds. Comments shou ld specify which Noti ce they are addressing.
ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION
The City of Renton ce rtifies to HUD t hat the Env i ronmenta l Review Committ ee consents t o acce pt the j urisd ict ion of t he
Federal Cou rts if an action i s brought to enforce responsibilities in rel ation to the en vironme ntal re v iew process and t hat
these responsibil it i es have been sa t isfied . HUD's approval of the certification sat isfi es its responsi bi lities under NEPA
and re l ated laws and authori ties and all ows the City of Renton to use Program funds .
-______...,,,._.------R=--e . toCITYnOF ®:: . -~ ' :.,~, .
..I. .1. . .
OBJECTIONS TO RELEASE OF FUNDS
HUD will accept objections to its re lease of fund and the City of Renton's ce rtification for a period of fifteen days
following the anticipated subm iss ion date or its actual receipt of the requ est (which ever is later) only if they are on one
of the following bases: (a) the certification was not executed by the Certifying Officer of the City of Renton; (b) the City
of Renton has omitted a step or failed to make a decision or finding requ ired by HUD regulations at 24 CFR part 58; (c)
the grant recipient or other participants in the development process have committed funds, incurred costs or
undertaken activities not authorized by 24 CFR Part 58 before approval of a release of funds by HUD; or (d) another
Federal agency acting pursuant to 40 CFR Part 1504 has submitted a written finding that the project is unsatisfactory
from the standpo i nt of environmental quality. Objections must be prepared and submitted in accordance with the
required procedures (24 CFR Part 58, Sec. 58.76) and shall be addressed t o HUD at Seattle Regiona l Office, Seattle
Federal Office Bu ilding, Office of Publ ic Housing, 909 Fi rst Avenue, Su i te 360, Seattle, WA 98104-1000. Po t ential
objectors shou l d contact HUD to verify the actual last day of the objection period.
Responsibl e Entity Certifying Officer
City of Renton Environmental Rev i ew Committee (ER()
Date of Dec ision: August 22, 2016
Date of Publication: August 26, 2016
~q Z 11l1!21(1.durn
Name, Signatur! ,__/
V
Name, Signature
Name, Signature
Name, Signature
... .-,wr -
=4f/JI ' CITYOF ~
-11------rttf__,,.-...--...... Renton v
NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST RELEASE OF FUNDS FOR SUNSET
TERRACE REDEVELOPMENT
DATE OF NOTICE:
NAME OF RESPONSIBLE ENTITY:
LAND USE NUMBER:
ADDRESS:
STAFF CONTACT:
PROJECT NAME:
August 26, 2016
City of Renton
LUA16-000630, ECF
Environmental Review Committee
Care of: Department of Community & Econo mic Development, Current Planning
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Vanessa Doi bee, 425 -43 0 -7200
Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy RROF-2016 -
2020
These notices shall satisfy two separate but related procedural requirements for activities to be undertaken by the
Renton Housing Authority.
REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS
On or about September 13, 2016 the City of Renton will authorize the Renton Hou sing Authority to subm it a request to
the US Depa rtment of Hou si ng and Urban Dev elopment for the release of Annual Contributions Contract Number SF-
187, Amendment Numbe r 22-N, Grant Number WA01P01150116, Capital Fund Program, and Operating Subsidy funds
under 24 CFR Part 905 of t he Uni ted States Housing Act of 1937, Section 9, to undertake a project known as WAOll
Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operati ng Subsidy Proposed Activities for 2016 -2020 for the purpose of
maintenance, rehabilitation, and operation of public housing, at about $330,000 annually for capital funds and up to
$642,000 annually for operating subsidies, b etween 2016-2020.
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
The City of Renton has determined that the project will have no significant impact on the human environment.
Therefore, a n Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA} is not
required. Additional project information is contained in the Environmental Revi ew Record (ERR) on file at the City of
Renton, Department of Community & Economic Development, Development Services, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,
WA 9805, where ERR can be examined and may be examined or copied weekdays 8 A.M to 5 P.M.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any individu al, group, or agency may submit written comments on the ERR to the City of Renton Environmental Review
Committee. All comments received by: September 12, 2016 will be considered by the City of Renton prior to authorizing
sub miss io n of a request for release of funds. Comments should specify which Notice th ey are addressing.
ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION
The City of Renton certifies to HUD that the Environmental Review Committee consents to accept th e jurisdiction of the
Federa l Courts if an action is brought to enforce responsibilities in relation to the environmental review process and that
these respons ibi litie s have been satisfied. HUD's approval of the certification satis f ies its responsibilities under NEPA
and related laws a nd authorities and allows the City of Renton to use Program funds.
OBJECTIONS TO RELEASE OF FUNDS
HUD will accept obj ec tions to its release of fund and the City of Renton's certificat ion for a period of fifteen days
following the anticipated subm ission date or its actual receipt of the request (whichever is later) only if they are on one
of the following bases: (a) the certification was not executed by the Certifying Officer of the City of Renton; (b) the City
of Renton has omitted a step or failed to make a decision or finding required by HUD reg ulations at 24 CFR part 58; (c)
the grant r ecip ient or other pa rticipants in the development proce ss have committed funds, incurred costs or
undertaken activities not authorized by 24 CFR Part 58 before approval of a release of fund s by HUD; o r (d) another
Federal agency act ing pursuant to 40 CFR Part 1504 has submitted a written finding that the project is unsat is factory
from the standpoint of environmental quality. Objections must be prepared and submitted in accordance with the
requi re d procedures (24 CFR Part 58, Sec. 58.76} and shall be addressed to HUD at Seattl e Regional Office, Seattle
Federal Office Building, Office of Public Housing, 909 First Avenu e, Suite 360, Seatt le, WA 98104-1000. Potential
objectors should contact HUD to ve rify the actual la st day of the objection pe r iod.
Responsible Entity Certifying Officer
City of Renton Environmenta l Review Committee (ERC)
Date of Dec is ion: Augus t 22, 2016
Dat e of Publication: Augu st 26, 2016
I { .__/ .
Name, Signature
Na m e, Signature
Name, Signature
Name, Sign ature
Department of Community and
Economic Development
NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST RELEASE OF FUNDS
FOR SUNSET TERRACE REDEVELOPMENT
DATE OF NOTICE: August 26, 2016
NAME OF RESPONSIBLE ENTITY: City of Renton
LAND USE NUMBER : LU A16 -0006 30, ECF
ADDRESS: Environmental Review Committee
Care of: Department of Community & Economic Development, Current Planning, 1055 South Grady WA,
Renton, WA 98055
STAFF CONTACT: Vanessa Dolbee, 425-430-7200
PROJECT NAME: Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy RROF-2016 -2020
These notices shall satisfy two separate but related procedural requirements for activities to be
undertaken by the Renton Housing Authority.
REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS
On or about September 13, 2016 the City of Renton w ill authorize the Renton Housing Authority to subm it
a request to the US Department of Housing and Urban Development for the release of Annual
Contributions Contract Number SF-187, Amendment Number 22-N, Grant Number WA01P01150116,
Capital Fund Program, and Operating Subsidy funds under 24 CFR Part 905 of the United States Housing
Act of 1937, Section 9, to undertake a project known as WAOll Renton Housing Authority Capita l Fund
and Operating Subsidy Proposed Activ ities for 2016-2020 for the purpose of maintenance, rehabilitation,
and operation of public housing, at about $330,000 annually for capital funds and up to $642 ,000 annually
for operating subs idies, between 2016-2020.
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
The City of Renton has determined that the project wil l have no significant impact on the human
environment. Therefore, an Environmental Impa ct Statement under the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) is not required. Additional project information is contained in the Environmental
Review Record (ERR) on file at the City of Renton, Department of Community & Economic Development,
Development Services, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 9805, where ERR can be exam ined and may
be examined or copied weekdays 8 A.M to 5 P.M .
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any individual, group, or agency may submit written comments on the ERR to the City of Renton
En vironmen tal Review Committee. All comments received by: September 12, 2016 will be considered by
the City of Renton prior to authorizing submission of a request for rel ease of funds. Comments should
specify which Notice they are addressing.
ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION
The City of Renton certifies to HUD that the Environmental Review Committee consents to accept the
jurisdiction of the Federal Courts if an action is brought to enforce responsibilities in relation to the
environmental review process and that these responsibilities ha ve been satisfied. HU D's approval of the
certification satisfies its responsibilities under NEPA and related laws and authorities and allows the City
of Renton to use Program funds.
OBJECTIONS TO RELEASE OF FUNDS
HUD will accept objections to its release of fund and the City of Renton's certification for a period of fifteen
days following the anticipated submission date or its actual receipt of the request (whichever is later) only
if they are on one of the following bases: (a) the certification was not executed by the Certifying Officer
of the City of Renton; (b) the City of Renton has omitted a step or failed to make a decision or finding
required by HUD regulations at 24 CFR part 58; (c) the grant recipient o r other participants in the
development process have committed funds, incurred costs or undertaken activities not authorized by 24
CFR Part 58 before approval of a release of funds by HUD; or (d) another Federal agency acting pursuant
to 40 CFR Part 1504 has submitted a written finding that the project is unsatisfactory from the standpoint
of environmental quality. Objections must be prepared and submitted in accordance w ith the required
procedures (24 CFR Part 58, Sec. 58.76) and shall be addressed to HUD at Seattle Regional Office, Se attle
Federal Office Building, Office of Public Housing, 909 First Avenue, Suite 360, Seattle, WA 98104-1000.
Potential objectors should contact HUD to verify the actual last day of the objection period.
Responsible Entity Certifying Officer
City of Renton Environmental Review Committee (ERC}
Date of Decision: August 22, 2016
Date of Publication: August 26, 2016
"I
t;j\!¥1C,l.flMl[l(!'.: m~.n ','.t.P
\,_ •. 1· ·00-0·
MKMGIII Mffll stl lOOl
/"'#,t,.
i
~
~
I' .. ~ ,.,"' /
lr.VJ)(M'OII.SI
[AIU
IFA!WWG
cnm.fl
AREA OF WORK
'='-" ~ ;
if,
rrr--:------
11 l( o 'i~ t~~A ~ I r~ \-8 ---\
t 1 ( ()"l'i j i ro~"1 \\
f / > . ~,Li \ I~'" Vi
I i ()' ni \D o "~1
\' 'J/ 11 \.
~,.~_/I
I CJ=-~~-. I
1~/0 I : L _____ ~ ~--J
""'"''+.s-,
ti
~...._fr'"'°'}
.f.. \fi'!~ c;;i
CD
~
schemata
,,vor~s ho:
!I:~ l (lt'
Sc herrat.a Wcr <s~cc. nc
'1;>01~~.f,~,B ,~
S~~,, WA 'JE"'l2
:'.:"-'IC r'h"'Ct ll:,n.,111,\
,(2C'(;l:'l'S':,!Y.l '/~\/'t:V~'
,_.,
Rer tur Houmq /Lt1cr1 ry
~i.r·c--s•
Pr1)1'WA ~
(:)'l,IT,\C '~1'[•'.ll)O':'r
, 141'".i nf -~~,, • -~n;
Fant ast ic Project
f'F\jf:",-:: '1•'t,7J'2
l'FQJE(1 1SS\/€OAHS
':;:;_.r "Ofl A~C~H
f! ~lVll'#
s:~ ;3, r,••,
=
\-~; \:;c::~~: I \{;,::·~-(V ·1
~-rc:::r~..._<11,~;1:;,
,\c;:~~-:;u
c~ ..... ,.,,,-r ..
NEIGHBORHOOD
DETA IL MAP
A001
(-Vf'•,;~· l(~p1.J"J Wc t,~11:i.1·t
c:
A'
~
~
I
ffl:JI..X
l~).ICO.SSB..E~.:.m.1~
Sf4.C[ S!Ci·~ tJJ
i:VMll)o:JNlAINfF
(7CS-5'X~ 0"1
Ow"l Nt Of
ftOO>I.SC,.'E
?'
.. IFA OIWDF(--'
(~~\~i.DSlnf'VI',/
,_/ 1.11"~ l C"
L
---------.
\__ =H,.'DlflV,'IJOU
!N:t:Sw~
!•8UlG
,1
//
"'cc-=,,, .. ,,,,,,,,"""·,
"'
/
/-i:t_·::~~;:.;_..,,__;z
,(. d ---,~~~';., '~~ A
I' 1/1 ill __ ;_,'-...."~, ",~~· -,,,,,, .. ,_,"'"
I ( ' ~(Y , r-~•vE
1 I I ( I ~ ; -':' ""'" ,,
1
1 f I , 0 ~-, ·\\,; ~ _ ''''"""''"' 0 : _ 1
1 0 I ,, ·'-· ''"'"·"-/ ) CJ }t~-')\ .. -'t CO S\. 1~1,1 ----',' -,\
11 ~,\,__ ,-" ·,·: •:, .. '"'"-'""'·-~"' ) /f?:0:\ ~ ff o_~-"'1 \\ iii\ ;:/0> /JI ~I\\ t/ \,\o i I ,:u1 ~ I~ I
!,i/ / / "U -\ ~ \~~ 11 ·-=u I_ -,·nm ""
I I 1l cl': r. I 1 '""'"
,
0
-n-~ i ii \.0~1'\'.;l f ojr 1, I ':'.;;/: TYT'!'.1l -I ,/', _, \;,... •I ' ,.,,~,, 1 1 -' -, '
AREA OF WOR K I ~""' _:_ • ~t "'m"
I I [)(\1'\( !I,'.
I ~AP( v: l ,.._ -0 ~ CO \ ·~ACTO" s ·o~V:JULDIM:I ll () 0 I' C:EM:~A..A~n~,··o,,\1~<;T{l~,\r,· '"' """' I r-------; ! ';:~::~:.-,,.;,,rtl'I If:'
""'"" j _ '. =----~----::'."~u•s--_-J_ .,~.-ss
,..-....._i:r1'tA'-
t/~4-~,-0·
L -
(!~Y.';1·~:: H't·:\
CD
ro,sr~~ ~
J;·-, (Ji
~
schemata
'l'/O r, ., 'i 0 :
a,chioc-
Sch~~ata Works100. In:
·n)·;-•1,,,,,.~.1 1J
s~~:1·~ w,JB,n
CC'.tA:..i ~•~t l.'1~.AlA
•'.~r,1n~·xJ r ·1~1,e~2.•J1
c"".......:·
R!:!·1101 ~cu s1rg ,'\u1ticr1ty
)q'r.':~r 1r.-... s:
~MT::n.'N/l,:l!IC~S
CC \'t.;:T V.,...-G~
~[.(Y,);1(; ·1r-,e •jtr.,:7
' Fan tasti c Project
>::NT['Ji\"[ '11'.i/2017
r,:[lj[t:' SS~tJ::_A _ _:S _
':i:iw~ ':)Fl !AI\C L.SE
'(\olrN
--s:r ;~ 2J':
=
~.·~; ~;~s. ~~c, I
~; f ,r,-::; ,'.' :... .
\ :=-IJ:Eo! (~ I
s·._·\:'V.'.l,.S ~\r:•r;\.
l'Jl"OI SJ
(.."'>ecw.e· f'I-I
SITE 0 LAN
A 101
:"ICY :l''. ~::--rr,1:~ 'l,'c-.:~..,cr ·x-
£
"'
~ ~
'-~
' p 31
r
I
0)~'·•
1
1~VAII~
J
:.I
L::i:::~:Z
t=
/'~~AT·ON
'-._.,/1,'')'z l-,Y
_J_'
~· -=
c..;:i.
~
u':'·'
r,-r;::r=
.L...,,.......L -,
,';-,·ii
:::':::i
-~
~
~
_I _ ----l~G~A~ -
-1m,l'!ltlf"JS!U
LF'ADf
1
I
;
n
TOJ9J'~9~~
~~\!~
·:SF:ICJ. I \
J([ . ~-',,,
l E'.U · I •
Jl!:I .E," II'
p
~~1----~--
_ 11
(i:J~~~~~ICN
b
lib% @'. • f hf I1-J:ii : ~ 4L: :~::h._,_ ,~
(~)~T~.~~ATO\
? """"""~
SIIIC (T:)~A-C:'< E'·
tJ ., ... ~s
'i -~SC'E'l:OCME
__ [~''"'
d
r---~ A "'r1Cl"J5W
. 3'-A~":
~
I
!f.
~
i~,:f'!Cs~ 6,
~
;:!I
I
~
lJ ;\'f l ~
~J 6'
-'J"JS;~:9~ ~
l ji;'\~ ~
~
schemata
·N c;r ,.~i ln :::
inhi!,ct
Sc:h!'!1~:a W::iik sh::io In~
llt)TM,A..,...,t l )
~11~:11~ ·~.t.5!11n
cc-. ·A:: G•IIC~ ( ·-,. I\
.. r7r.Fi1H·,1'l:tt?:'.:I\J l b 21:·
=·
Ac,ton Ho us11 g Autt'cr ':if
?9:lC N' 1,-..51
~M':"Ji'I 'IJ.t,S8(~
'.;(J'.-il,;::T Mi,,-.G·ooc-:·
,[lZSJn;•~'./' 'it Y,l ;
Fan tast ic Project
p:ir,.r c.e,·t ·1;1z,'l:n2
rnnJrc · :ss .. r J.t,·t~
l)S1.f 00fo:Lo\'i 0$~ SP,'1l_,"t::J
~ ~(Vlft,
=
E-X' ri>fo1s1 , ·
\~·:-.f ~} ,:,~c:1.il.:r·
\ c~,,u~ ct v, I
S'A . C·Vl:0.5·· '.G'O".
:...s1.,c• SI)
C~lu!· p~
I' ARCHITECTUPA L
ELEVATIONS
A201
C,.r,r ~h'. s.r~,,...,..,:W r'\,~c; 1..:
" i
0 --___.,,_ --.,
e~':'--.~'<,:
S;I ',
'
'
' /' ,, ,,
'' '' I ' l;
' :
' ' ,, :
;I I ,, '
'' ,, '
''' 'I::
I''
I ,,. ..
7
I i
I I I I I B ! I I~ i I
I
-I
I D I I
\ I C ! ' I
\ ,~
\ Ll
r-···-·--.,--
1'-----l '---··!
j I -·-········· ··1
I I
r----~-
i ;
I j r...., ____ ~1
I
'. -~
,,
i'.
i· ;.f
I i: ,,
..
---r . ..,._. -
1 :;
I 4~ t ~--. ·~ t;:; .,:.. f.
1
.. ~·· ···!'t-· _:a__· lil-'·' . 4-·:::::·n
II' '. _¥1... ' -.... ~
-~-:-----::.-. -
•, ~;
j.
1'1 \_ •. .;_ --•. ·~~-.J
l ... ,
,.
.: ... :;--
'. ,.
I
i~
Ii
1
~··¥-~'!-·N •
.. j': !
---., . .,.., ____ .._..r~·':"'
Work in each unit may include the following:
--·--.!,,,,
1. Remove fixtures and wall coverings from the bathroom.
Remove gas wall heater from the bathroom, insulate and
patch wall.
2. Seal bathroom walls.
3. Open wall and remove and replace tub/shower valve.
Close wall
4. Mud and float bathroom walls. Prep for paint.
5. Install Panasonic ultra-quiet fan /light combo. Vent
through the roof.
6. Install plastic laminate wainscot up 48 inches in the entire
bathroom.
7. Replace vinyl floor in the bathroom.
8. Build new sink top and install over a 12 inch drawer bank,
support with triangle brace under. Apply p-lam to sub top
and install new china lav. with single handle faucet and
new supply lines and angle stops.
9 . Install grab bars at the toilet and inside-outside of shower
10. Install new 1.6 gpf. toilet w/seat. Install new angle stop
and supply. Install paper holder, towel bars and ring.
11. Change out gas wall heater with new forced air gas furnace
including all associated duct work and registers.
12. Change out water heater and add earthquake strapping.
13. Remove kitchen sink, counter top and back splash. Replace
angle stops and supplies. Install new plywood sub tops w/
site fit plastic laminate counter tops, back splash and new
stainless steel sink and new faucet.
14. Sand and refinish the kitchen cabinets. Install cabinet
doors and hardware.
15. Fabricate and install p-lam covered widow sill in the
kitchen and bath.
16. Fabricate and install small kitchen cabinet next to the
range to match other cabinets.
17. Install new fluorescent light in the kitchen.
18. Install new blinds.
19. Install new hardwire smoke detectors in hall and bed
room.
20. Fabricate storage unit for furnace alcove.
21. Repair unit doors as necessary.
22. Up-date appliances.
~ . ) ., '
Maintenance
Maintenance
Rehabilitation
Maintenance
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation
Maintenance
Rehabilitation
Maintenance
Maintenance
Rehabilitation
Maintenance
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation
Maintenance
Maintenance
Maintenance
Rehabilitation
Maintenance
Maintenance
; I
Project Scope Statement : August 2015
The goal of the CFP or Modernization Plan is to make dwelling unit improvements in a way
that will minimize the ongoing need of capital improvements for a period of 20 years. Updating,
modernizing and making the dwelling unit more energy efficient are all goals of this program.
Bathroom Area;
1) Add bath heat, light, vent fan.
2) Change worn -out and rusty wall hung lav.
3) Asbestos abatement of flooring and base
adhesives.
4) Install new vinyl, and cove base in bath.
5) Change out all plumbing to water conserving
type fixtures -faucets, toilet and shower heads
6) Remove and Replace the domestic water
supply angle stops, supply lines, and traps.
7) Remove and Replace bath surround, tub or
shower pan
8) Change out bath wainscoting
9) Install new window coverings
10) Replace medicine cabinet
11) Install new energy efficient lighting
Main Living Area;
1) Install override switch for ceiling fan to include
switch and wiring.
2) Seal and paint wood ceiling.
3) Re-finish interior closet doors.
4) Complete paint
5) Asbestos abatement of flooring and base
adhesives.
6) Change out carpet and pad to VCT tile floor.
7) Install ceiling fan if not unit does not have one
already installed.
8) Install new rubber cove base.
9) Install new window coverings throughout unit.
Bedroom Area;
1) Seal and paint wood ceiling.
2) Re-finish bi-fold closet doors.
3) Asbestos abatement of flooring and base
adhesives.
4) Change out carpet and pad to VCT tile floor.
Evergreen Terrace Dwelling Unit Modernization Plan
Rehabilitation
Maintenance
Rehabilitation
Maintenance
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation
Maintenance
Maintenance
Maintenance
Maintenance
Maintenance
Maintenance
Maintenance
Rehabilitation
Maintenance
Rehabilitation
Maintenance
Maintenance
Maintenance
Maintenance
Rehabilitation
Maintenance
1
.,
'I :;\
5) Install new rubber cove base. Maintenance
6) Replace bedroom light fixture. Maintenance
7) Install new window coverings Maintenance
8) Replace Bi-fold doors Maintenance
9) Insure proper operation of smoke/CO device, Maintenance
change batteries
Kitchen Area;
1) Fabricate new counter tops install Formica, and Rehabilitation
back sp lash in kitchen.
2) Re-finish cabinets in kitchen. Maintenance
3) Asbestos abatement of flooring and base Rehabilitation
adhesives.
4) Change out vinyl floor to VCT tile floor. Maintenance
5) Install new sink, faucet, drain lines, angle stops Rehabilitation
and supply lines.
6) Change kitchen light to T8 fluorescent fixture. Maintenance
7) Change out stove range vent fan and ducting. Rehabilitation
8) Install new energy five star rated app li ances. Maintenance
9) Install new window coverings Maintenance
Unit exterior;
1) Refinish T@G patio ceiling. Maintenance
2) Pressure wash concrete patio. Rehabilitation
3) Paint exterior front screen door frame. Maintenance
4) Restore dwelling unit land scape Rehabilitation
5) Replace exterior lighting to LED Maintenance
6) Remove satellite dish Maintenance
Everg reen Terrace Dwelling Unit Modernization Plan 2
ATTACHMENT A: PROJECT DESCRIPTION
WA011 Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating
Subsidy Proposed Activities for 2016 -2020
Prepared by: BERK Cons u lting, Cultura l Resource Co nsult an t s LLC, Landau Associates,
and Weinman Consulting LLC
1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 Portfolio of Properties ...................................................................................................................... 2
3.0 NEPA Review ..................................................................................................................................... 7
4.0 Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy Activities ................................................................................. 8
4.1 Areawide Activities ....................................................................................................................... 8
4.2 Site-Spec ifi c Activities ................................................................................................................... 9
WA011000001-Sunset Terrace ............................................................................................................. 9
WA011000002-Hillcrest Terrace ......................................................................................................... 10
WA011000003-Evergreen Terrace ...................................................................................................... 12
WA011000005-Cole Manor ................................................................................................................ 13
1.0 INTRODUCTION
All activities receiving Capital Fund Grants and Operating Subsidies from the U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD) are required to undergo review pursuant to the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA), consistent with HU D's rules (24 CFR Part 58). The City of Renton is the NEPA
Responsible Entity (RE) for Renton Housing Authority's (RHA) proposals.
This document describes RHA's proposed Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy activities for 2016 to
2020. These activities are evaluated in the accompanying NEPA Environmental Assessment (EA). NEPA
review for RHA's proposed activities is being accomplished by a single programmatic EA review for the
period 2016 to 2020 and is applicable to all affected properties in the Renton Housing Authority's
portfolio.
Capital Funds and Operating Subsidies for the f ive-year period are id entified in Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 2.
August 2016 1
Exhibit 1. Capital Fund Grant
Fiscal Yea r
WA01P011501-16 {FY 2016)
Estimated 2017
Estimated 2018
Estimated 2019
Estimated 2020
Gr ant
$325,037
$330,000
$330,000
$330,000
$330,000
Source: US HUD District 10, Renton Hou sing Authority 2016
Fiscal Year
2016
Exhibit 2. Operating Subsidy
Estimate based on 2016 LIPH inventory 2017
Estimate based on 2016 LIPH inventory 2018
Estimate based on 2016 LIPH inv~ntory 2019
Estimate based on 2016 LIPH inventory 2020
Subsidy
$641,696
$600,000
$600,000
$600,000
$600,000
Source: US HUD District 10, Renton Housing Authority 2016
2.0 PORTFOLIO OF PROPERTIES
The Renton Housing Authority manages eight subsidized properties that are available to low income
households or low-income senior or disabled households. See Exhibit 3 and Exhibit 4. NEPA exempt
activities would be conducted at all eight properties. Exempt and non -exempt activities are proposed on
four properties-Cole Manor, Evergreen Terrace, Hillcrest Terrace, and Sunset Terrace (prior NEPA
clearance in 2011).
August 2016 2
',._, :.-•
Exhibit 3. Vicinity Map -Renton Housing Authority
Subsidized Sites subject to NEPA Evaluation
Henton Housi n g Authority: Su bsi d ized Properties
mBERK
Source: King County, City of Renton, BERK Consulting 2016
See Section 4.2 for proposed activities.
August 2016
Kirkland •
fownhomes · ~·"";i:'tl~tL.
t't".~~,
/
l .,,,\.,._
Glenwood NF , ''h ,_.,
Townhomcs f · -"·' ,,, . ,
Sunset /
. Terra~
\·~· \. . ,,, ....
Golden
P ines Apts
Coic Ma nor
)
L
Exhibit 4. Renton Housing Authority Subsidized Public & Senior Housing
subject to NEPA Evaluation -Building and Site Photos
1. Hillcrest Terrace, 1442 Hillcrest Lane NE
Built: 1966 I Units: 60
Maximum Income per household: 80% AMI
Must be over 62 yrs. or disabled
August 2016
2. Evergreen Terrace, 3027 NE 15th
Built: 1968 I Units: 50
Maximum Income per household: 80% AMI
Must be over 62 yrs. or disabled
See Section 4.2 for proposed activities.
~,l',:
Cl!lPii ·J~
4
Exhibit 4. Renton Housing Authority Subsidized Public & Senior Housing
subject to NEPA Evaluation -Building and Site Photos
3. Cole Manor, 2811 NE 4TH
Built: 1981 I Units: 28
Maximum Income per household: 80% AMI
See Section 4.2 for proposed activities.
August 2016
-"""""-
4. Sunset Terrace Redevelopment, NE Sunset Blvd
Demolished for Redevelopment
Will be mixed income redevelopment with market rate
and subs idized housing
See Section 4.2 for proposed activities.
5
Exhibit 4. Renton Housing Authority Subsidized Public & Senior Housing
subject to NEPA Evaluation -Building and Site Photos
5. Glennwood Townhomes,
1141 & 1147 Glennwood Avenue
Built 2012 I Units: 8
Maximum Income per household: 50% AMI
See Section 4.1 for proposed activities.
August 2016
~
6. Kirkland Townhomes, 1508 Kirkland Ave NE
Built 2014 I Units: 18
Maximum Income per household: 50% AMI
See Section 4.1 for proposed activities.
6
.. -.:D
Exhibit 4. Renton Housing Authority Subsidized Public & Senior Housing
subject to NEPA Ev~luation -Building and Site Pho~os
7. Golden Pines, 2901 NE 101
h
Built: 1976 I Units: 53
8. Cedar River Terrace, 51 Burnett Street
Built 1978 I Units: 72
Must be over 62 yrs., Maximum Income per
household: 50% AMI
Must be over 62 yrs., Maximum Income per household:
50% AMI
See Section 4.1 for proposed activities. See Section 4.1 for proposed activities.
Source: Renton Housing Authority, Google Earth, BERK Consulting 2016
The Renton Housing Authority also manages market rate housing; those dwellings are not subsidized
and not addressed in this NEPA evaluation.
3.0 NEPA REVIEW
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has developed NEPA rules that are
implemented by RE's and contained in 24 CFR Part 58 . The rules identify categories of activities that are
exempt from NEPA review, those that are categorically excluded, or that require EAs that lead to a
finding of no significance, or that are potentially significant and require an e nvironmental impact
statement (EIS).
• 58.34 Exempt activities. Across the eight subsidized housing properties, exempt activities would
occur over the 2016 -2020 period such as administration and management, public services and
training, and minor maintenance such as normal cleaning, landscaping, etc.
• 58.35 Categorical exclusions. Across three of the properties -Cole Manor, Evergreen Terrace, and
Hillcrest Terrace-categorically excluded activities are proposed including rehabilitation and
Americans with Disability Act (ADA) barrier removals.
• 58.36 Environmental assessments. Some proposals could alter or expand existing site
improvements and d epending on the nature and extent of changes requi re an EA (e .g. solid waste
August 2016 7
enclosures increased the capacity of the facility by more than 20 percent though impervious areas
were increased by less than 20 percent).
• 58.37 Environmental impact statement determinations. No activities are proposed that would
require an environmental impact statement during the 2016-2020 period. Given redevelopment of
Sunset Terrace has already been studied under NEPA in 2011, additional review is not needed (see
Section 4.2).
The RE must make a determination of the level of environmental review required for every project and
document it in the Environmental Review Record (ERR). At a minimum in Washington State, NEPA-
exempt activities address flood disaster protection and airport clear zones. Categorically excluded
activities document the same information as exempt activities but also provide compliance
documentation regarding related Federal laws and authorities (24 CFR 58.5). Activities subject to an EA
fill in similar but more extensive checklist information than categorically excluded items.
HUD Guidance has clarified the distinction between maintenance activities that are exempt and
rehabilitation activities that are either categorically excluded (where work is minor and does not disturb
the ground) or otherwise may require an EA. (Notice CPD-16-02, February 8, 2016} Maintenance
includes, but is not limited to, lawn care, repainting, fixing leaks, washing windows, carpet replacement,
servici ng elevators, replacing stoves/refrigerators/microwaves, etc. Rehabilitation includes, but is not
limited to, new landscaping, construction of new walkways, stripping paint surfaces, replacing windows
and doors, installation of new furnace systems, re-siding, major rewiring of buildings, new plumbing
systems, and others.
The Renton Housing Authority Capital Fund and Operating Subsidy program consists of a mix of exempt
and non-exempt activities; to ensure completeness this EA evaluates all proposed categories of
activities.
4.0 CAPITAL FUND AND OPERATING SUBSIDY ACTIVITIES
The proposal consists of Renton Housing Authority's (RHA's) proposed Capital Fund and Operating
Subsidy activities for 2016 to 2020. Activities include:
• Public Housing Authority-wide administration, operations, technical assistance, training, fees
and costs, and delivery of services such as summer youth programs.
• Low Income Public Housing Authority-wide maintenance including appliance replacement, non-
dwelling equipment and tools.
• Plans and designs of the Sunset Terrace Replacement Units (prior NEPA clearance in 2011).
• Maintenance, Rehabilitation, and Public Facility Improvements at Hillcrest Terrace, Evergreen
Terrace, and Cole Manor.
This section categorizes activities that apply across the Renton Housing Authority subsidized housing
properties, and those that apply to individual properties.
4.1 Areawide Activities
Across the Renton Housing Authority portfolio of eight subsidized properties (see Exhibit 3), the 5-year
plan includes the following activities considered exempt in Sec. 58.34. These activities are
programmatically addressed in the EA where necessary to address 24 CFR 58.6 Requirements.
1. Environmental and other studies, resource identification, and development of plans and strategies
August 2016 8
2. Administrative and management activities
3. Public services that will not have a physical impact or result in any physical changes, such as summer
youth programs
4. Purchase of tools, non-dwelling equipment
5. Engineering or design costs
6. Technical assistance and training
7 . Operating Costs:
a. Maintenance: ongoing property cleaning, landscaping and similar; replacement of failing
appliances
b. Security
C. Operation
d . Furnishings
e. Equipment
f. Supplies
g. Staff training and recruitment
8. Fees and Costs
4.2 Site·Specific Activities
WAOllOOOOOl-Sunset Terrace
9. The activity consists of development planning and design of replacement units on Sunset Terrace
property. The site was approved for demolition/disposition in 2012, and addressed in the following
NEPA Documents and the associated Record of Decision and revisions:
a. CH2M Hill and ICF International. 2011. Sunset Area Community Planned Action NEPA/SE PA
Environmental Impact Statement. Final. April. (ICF 00593.10.) Bellevue and Seattle, WA.
Prepared for City of Renton and the Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA.1
b. Ree valuation/ Addendum, Renton Sunset Terrace Redevelopment 2014, Prepared By: BERK
Consulting in association with CH2M Hill, Mithun, and Weinman Consulting LLC
c. Reevaluation/ Addendum Renton Sunset Terrace Redevelopment 2016, Prepared By: BERK
Consulting in association with CH2MHill, CRC, Mithun, Perteet, and Weinman Consulting LLC
1 The same Env ironmental Impact Statement in 8.a addressed the construction of the Glennwood To w n homes and
Kirkland Townhomes. However, areawide activities identified in Section 4.1 w ould apply to these sites.
August 2016 9
WA011000002-Hillcrest Terrace
Hillcrest Terrace is identified for the following activities:
10. Site improvement:
a. Garbage-recycling station, 2016:
i. Description: The station expands and improves an existing garbage and recycling collection
area, adding space for more garbage, recycling, and yard waste bins, adding a ramp,
replacing and extending enclosure walls, replacing and rearranging sidewalks, adding
landscaping, and adding a roof. See Exhib it 5 for photos and diagram s. See Appendix A for a
scaled site plan and list of activities.
i i. NEPA Review Status: The existing footprint of the solid waste enclosure expanded more
than 50 percent to a size of 240 square feet requiring review under an environmental
assessment, though the sidewalks and impervious area increased by less than 20 percent
consistent with a categorical exclusion threshold (see thresholds at 24 CFR 58.35(a)(l))3. The
station has been constructed as of March 2016 consistent with preced i ng budget requests.
Because the station was not part of its own environmental clearance under NEPA, and is not
exe mpt, it is addressed in this EA.
b. Americans with Dis ability Act (ADA) access upgrades, 2017 -2020:
i. Description: Upgrades may include replacement of current failing sidewalks, extra ADA curb
cuts, and possible ADA mail box areas. Sidewalks that are replaced will be pervi ous to the
extent feasible, and will offset any additions of impervious area.
ii. NEPA Review Status: ADA curb cuts and mail box areas are consistent with the categorical
exclusion regarding improvements to address mobility by seniors and the disabled.2 RHA
staff anticipate like for like r eplacement of sidewalks, which would be categorically excluded
(less than 20 percent change in size is categorically excluded) 3
• In any case it is
programmatically addressed in this EA for completeness.
2 Categorical exclusion includes "Spec ial projects d irected to the remova l of material and architectural barriers that
restrict the mobility of and accessibility to elde rly and handicapped persons." (24 CFR 58.35 (a)(2))
1 Categor ical exclusion includes "Acquisition, repair, improvement, reconstruction, or reh ab ilitation of public
facilities and improvements (othe r than buildings) when the facilities and improvements are in place and will be
retained in the same use wit hout change in size or capacity of more than 20 percent (e.g., r ep lacement of water or
sewe r lines, reco nstruction of curbs and sidewalks, repav i ng of streets)." (24 CFR 58.35 (a}(l))
August 2016 10
Exhibit 5. Hillcrest Garbage-Recycling Enclosure
·-
[E.JACCESSiBL~ P8Jl K!Ni3
(
(
I
SPAC E. SIGtJ [3) -------~-
?-Yll.RO CO\ T/'..l',JER
;2 "~ 5'· 3' ;(4'-D')
fJ UTLl),E.CF
' (
RO OFABO ',•E -----'----"---~-
~'
il.R8l JF WORK ---;
I
[EJ UG fH POST
Sou rc e: Schemata 2015, Google Earth 2016
Aug ust 2016
/I
,,lo/
I .:
/ /
I ' ,ll
/ /
I /
,/
./
I~---_:.---~ 1~~--
\
'· C W O [f.j '/•/•JOO
ancs.uR E.
11
11. Dwelling Structures:
a. Shop building modernization, 2016:
i. Description: Utilize old laundry/office/foyer area for maintenance storage and work space.
See Appendix A for a sc hematic of the current building.
ii. NEPA Review Status: Some of the modernization work may be considered exempt
maintenance or may be considered categorically-excluded rehabilitation depending on
whether normal cleaning and servicing is conducted or if there is intens ive cleanin g or
replacement of equipment, windows, paneling, ceilings, floors, etc . For completeness, it is
encompassed in this programmatic EA.
b. Interior unit repairs, 2016-2017:
i. Description: Unit repairs including painting, flooring, cabinets, and fixtures. Paint type is
anticipated to be latex-based paint . Asbestos abatement offlooring and base adhesives b y
contractors at the time of vacant unit renovation work. See Appendix B for a deta iled list of
repairs.
ii . NEPA Review Status : The work includes a mix of maintenance and rehab il itation acti vities,
which are exempt or categorically excluded, respectively . See Appendix 8 for an
identification of both categories of activities. Rehabilitation activities would not change the
use of the structures, or increase density; the efforts are not anticipated to cost more th an
75 percent of the value of the improvements following rehabilitation.4
c. Dwelling Equipment, 2016-2020:
i. Description: Replace appliances and hot water heaters.
ii. NEPA Review Status: These are considered exempt maintenance, but are programmatically
addressed in this EA to address 24 CFR 58.6 Requireme nts. See Appendix B.
WA011000003-Evergreen Terrace
12. Site improvement, 2017 -2020:
a. ADA access upgrades.
i. Description: Possible replacement of current failing sidewalks, extra ADA curb cuts, and
possible ADA mail box areas as well as improvements in the common laundry room area .
Sidewalks that are replaced will b e pervious to the extent feasible, and will offset any
additions of impervious area.
ii. NEPA Review Status: See 9.b regarding status of activities as categorically excluded or
subject to EA.
4 See exe mption at 24 CFR 58 .35 (3) "Rehabilitation of buildings and improve ments when t he following conditions
are met: (ii) In the case of multifamily residential buildings: (A) Unit density is not changed more than 20 percent;
(B) The project does not i nvolve changes i n land use from r es idential to non-residential; and (C) The estimated cost
of reha bi litation is less than 75 percent of the total estimated cost of replacement after rehabil itation."
August 20 16 12
13. Dwelling Structures, 2016-2017:
a. Interior unit repairs.
i. Description: Interior repairs including paint, flooring, cabinets, and fixtures. Asbestos
abatement of flooring and base adhesives by contractors at the time of vacant unit
renovation work. See Appendix C for a list of improvements.
ii. NEPA Status: The work includes a mix of maintenance and rehabilitation, which are exempt
or categorically excluded, respectively. See Appendix C for an identification of both
categories of activities. Rehabilitation activities would not change the use of the structures,
or increase density; the efforts are not anticipated to cost more than 75 percent of t he value
of the improvements following rehabilitation.
14. Dwelling Equipment, 2016-2020:
a. Description: Replace ap pl iances and hot water heaters.
b. NEPA Review Status: These are considered exempt maintenance, but are programmatically
addressed in this EA to address 24 CFR 58.6 Requirements. See Appendix C.
WAOllOOOOOS-Cole Manor
15. Site improvement:
a. Perimeter fence replacement and sidewalk work, 2016:
i. Description: Perimeter fence repl acement may exceed one cubic foot soil disturbance as
new post holes may be required to be dug for fence post placement. Sidewalk work includes
replacing current damaged sidewalks with new, such as where trees have buc kled sidewalks .
Sidewalks that are replaced will be pervious to the extent feasible, and will offset any
additions of impervious area.
ii. NEPA Review Status: Activities focus on replacement of a fence and sidewalk, and would be
categorically excluded 3 (less than 20 percent change in size is categorically excluded). In any
case it is programmatically addressed in this EA for completeness.
b. ADA access upgrades, 2017-2020:
i. Description: Access upgrades include ADA curb cuts, dumpster locations, and common
laundry room area. It is anticipated that the improvements at the dumpster locations would
include altering an access ramp to reduce the slope, and that there would be an increase in
impervious area at that location.
ii. NEPA Review Status: See 9.b for categorization of ADA work under NEPA .
16. Dwelling Structures:
a. Siding Replacement, 2016:
i. Replace exterior sid i ng with new siding material (Hardie -Pl ank type siding); old material to
be removed by contractor for disposal. Activities are rehabilitation in nature, and
categorically excluded, but addressed in this EA .
August 2016 13
b. Interior repairs, 2016-2017:
i. Description: paint, flooring, cabinets, fixtures. Paint is anticipated to be latex based paint.
Cab inet replacement would occur as needed; floors to be replaced. No asbestos containing
materials have been identified.
i i. NEPA Review Status: Activities are a mix of maintenance (paint, flooring) and rehabilitation
(re-siding, cabinets), which are exempt or categorically excluded respectively. However, the
activities are programmatically addressed in this EA. Rehabilitation activities would not
change the use of the structures, or increase density; the efforts are not anticipated to cost
more than 75 percent of the value of the improvements following rehabilitation.
17. Dwelling Equipment, 2016-2020:
a. Description: Replace appliances and hot water heaters.
b. NEPA Review Status: These are considered exempt maintenance but are programmatically
addressed in this EA, to address 24 CFR 58.6 Requirements.
August 2016 14
Attachment B: Worksheets
Protection of Wetlands
Checklist for HUD or Responsible Entitv
General requirements Leeislation Regulation
Avoid the adverse impacts associated with the Executive Order 11990, 24 CFR Part 55
destruction and modification of wetlands and to May 24 1977
avoid direct or indirect support of new construction
in wetlands wherever there is a practicable
alternative.
1. Does the project include new construction, rehabilitation that expands the footprint of the building,
or ground disturbance'?
D No: STOP here. The Protection of Wetlands executive order does not apply. Record your determination
that the project is not in a wetland.
[81 Yes: Proceed to #2
2. Is there a wetland on your project site'?
O Use both national and local resources to make this determination. A good first step is to check the National ,
Wetlands Inv entory's digital wetlands mapper tool: http://www.fws .gov/wctlands/DataiMa~_rJ1trnl If site ·
conditions or other documents indicate there may be a wetland, next check with city, county or tribal experts
for local wetlands inventories. If none exist, the presence of hydric soils can indicate a wetland. If you suspect
a wetland due to soil type or s ite conditions, you should commission a professional site survey to delineate the
wetland and its boundaries.
HUD defines a wetland as those areas that are inundated with surface or ground water with a frequency
sufficient to support and under normal circumstances does or would support a prevalence of vegetative or
aquatic life that requires saturated or seasonally saturated soil conditions for growth and reproduction. .
Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas such as sloughs, pothole s, wet mea dows, i
river overflows, mud flats, and natural ponds. The definition includes wetlands separated from their natural
supply of water and constmcted wetlands. Please note that the US Army Corps of Engineers has a more
restrictive definition of wetlands. A determination by the US Army Corps that there is no jurisdictional
wetland on site is not sufficient documentation for HUD's purposes.
Maintain, in your ERR, all documents you have collected to make your wetlands determination.
[81 No: STOP here. The Protection of Wetlands executive order does not apply. Record your determination
that the project is not in a wetland. Sec Wetlands and Water Classifications.
D Yes: Proceed to #3.
3. Does your project involve new construction in the wetland? New construction includes draining,
dredging, channelizing, tilling, diking, impounding, and related activities.
D No: STOP here. The Protection of Wetlands executive order does not apply. Record your determination
that the project does not involve new construction in a wetland.
D Yes: Proceed to /14.
4. Docs your project meet one of the categories of proposed action for which the 8-stcp decision making
process does not apply? (Below are several e x emptions that apply to wetlands please sec 24 CFR
55.12(b) and 55.12(c) for additional categories of proposed action)
• The approval of financial assistance for restoring and preserving the natural and beneficial functions and
v alues of floodplains and wetlands, including through acquisition of such floodplain and wetland
property if:
o The property is cleared of all existing structures and related improvements;
I IUD Region X Environmental Office -April 2015
o The property is dedicated for permanent use for flood contru1, wetland protection, park Land, or
open space; and
o A permanent covenant or comparable restriction is placed on the property's continued use to
preserve the floodplain or wetland from future development.
• A minor amendment to a previously approved action with no additional adverse impact on or from a
floodplain or wetland.
• Project site with an incidental portion situated in an adjacent floodplain, including the floodway or
Coastal High Hazard Area, or wetland, but only if:
o The proposed construction and landscaping activities (except for minor grubbing, clearing of
debris, pruning, sodding, seeding, or other similar activities) do not occupy or modify the 100-
year floodplain ( or the 500-year floodplain for critical actions) or the wetland;
o Appropriate provision is made for site drainage that would not have an adverse effect on the
wetland;and
o A permanent covenant or comparable restriction is placed on the property's continued use to
preserve the floodplain or wetland.
• Special Projects directed to the removal of material and architectural barriers that restrict the mobility of
and accessibility to elderly and persons with disabilities.
D Yes: Stop here. Record your determination that the project is exempt from floodplain management
regulations per 24 CFR 55.12. Maintain copies of all of the documents you have used to make your
determination.
D No: Proceed to step 5.
5. Does your project meet one of the categories of proposed action for which a limited 8-step process
applies? (Below are categories that apply to wetlands, please see 24 CFR 55 .12 (a) for additional categories
of proposed action)
• Actions under any HUD program involving the repair, rehabilitation, modernization, weatherization, or
improvement of existing multifamily housing projects, nursing homes, assisted living facilities, board
and care facilities, intermediate car facilities and one-to-four family properties in communities in the
Regular Program of the NFIP and in good standing, units are not increased more than 20 percent, the
action does not involve a conversion from nonresidential to residential land use, the action does not
meet the thresholds for 'substantial improvement,i and the footprint of the structure and paved areas is
not significantly increased.
• Actions under any HUD program involving the repair, rehabilitation, modernization, weatherization, or
improvement of existing nonresidential buildings and structures in communities in the Regular Program
of the NFIP and in good standing, the action does not meet the thresholds for 'substantial
improvement'' and the footprint of the structure is not significantly increased.
D Yes: Complete the 5-step decision-making process for wetlands. You do not have to publish the notices in
steps 2 or 7 or do an analysis of alternatives in Step 3. Analyze potential direct and indirect impacts (step 4);
design or modify to minimize potential impacts (step 5); reevaluate the proposed action to determine if action is
still practicable (step 6).
• lf still practicable, document your analysis in the file and move forward.
• If not still practicable, either reject or modify project.
D No: Proceed to #6 .
HUD Region X Lnvironmcntal Office April 20 15
6. Are there practicable alternatives to impacting a wetland?
HUD strongly discourages use of funds for projects that do not meet an exemption in Part 55.12.
' Reject the Project Site or amend project so there is no destruction or modification of the wetland. If you
decide to consider the project you must determine if there are alternatives by completing the 8-step
:
, decision-making process described in 24 CFR Section 55.20. The 8-step decision-making process requires two •
public notice and comment periods. Appropriate and practicable compensatory mitigation is recommended for
i unavoidable adverse impacts to more than one acre of wetland. The use of compensatory mitigation may not
substitute for the requirement to avoid and minimize impacts to the maximum extent practicable. For further
i details about compensatory mitigation please see 24 CFR 55.20(e)(2) and 55.2(b)(2).
\
j
i
A completed Individual Section 404 permit can cover steps 1-5 in the 8-step process if the project is not in the I 00 ~
year flood plain (or 500 year floodplain for critical actions) and all wetlands adversely affected by the action are
covered by the permit. (24 CFR 55.28)
D Yes: Reject or modify project.
0 No: Document your analysis, including wetlands notices, in your Environmental Review Record.
DISCLAIMER: This document is intended as a tool to help Region X
grantees and HUD staff complete NEPA requirements. This document is
subject to change. This is not a policy statement, and the Floodplain
Executive Order and Regulations take precedence over any information found
in this document.
1 Substantial Improvement means any repair, reconstruction , modernization or improvement of a structure, the cost of
which equals or exceeds 50% of the market value of the structure either before the improvement or repair started or if the
structure has been damaged before the damage occurred OR any repair reconstruction etc. that results in an increase of
more than 20% of dwelling units or peak number of customers and employees (24 CFR 55.2(b)(8)
HUD Region X Envirorunental Office April 2015
:
General re uirements
EPA requires federal actions to
conform to State or Federal
Clean Air Act Compliance
Checklist for HUD or Res onsible Enti
Le islation Re ulation
Clean Air Act (42 U.S .C. 7401 40 CFR Parts 6 , 51 and 93
et seq.) as amended
1. Does your project require an environmental assessment level review for new construction or
major rehabilitation of existing structures?
D No: STOP here. The Clean Air Act conformity requirements do not apply. Record your
determination.
[g]Yes: PROCEED to #2
2. ls the project located in a designated non-attainment area for criteria air pollutants?
1r~~..,. ~
Maintain, in your ERR, either a map or list of non-attainment areas in your region.
You can find information on non-attainment areas by state at this website:
http://epa.gov/oar/oaqps/greenbk/ancl.html
[8]No: STOP here. The Clean Air Act conformity requirements do not apply. Record your
determination. The Puget Sound region is considered a maintenance area, and is not designated a
non-attainment area. See
http://www.ecy. '" a.gov/p rograms/air/sips/designations/mainten ancc _ areas. htm. Puget Sound
Clean Air Agency and City of Renton regulations regarding construction apply (other best
management practices are rccommcuded per environmental assessment). '10 operational
increases in traffic trips are anticipated as no dwellings are added.
0Yes: PROCEED to #3
3. Does your project exceed de minimis impact criteria?
Determine if your project will result in emissions (both direct and indirect) that exceed the de
mimimis thresholds established for each criteria pollutant at 40 CFR Part 93.153 (see attached). In
general, HUD projects will not exceed this threshold. However, you should work with your local air
quality authority to determine whether your project may have an impact on air quality. For PM-10
and PM 2.5 non -attainment areas , please make special note of any local dust control regulations that
might apply during construction. Please see attached document for air authority contacts.
0No: STOP here. The project does not impact air quality. Record your determination on the Statutory
Worksheet and attach documentation.
DY es: PROCEED to #4
4. Docs your project conform with the State or Federal Action Plan for air quality'?
Work with your local or state air quality authority to determine if your project conforms with your
State Action plan. If you cannot reach this determination, please contact your HUD environmental
officers for further guidance.
DISCLAIMER: This docwnent is intended as a tool to help Region X
grantees and HUD staff comp lete HUD environmental requirements . This
document is subject to change. This is not a policy statement, and the Clean
Air Act Legislation and Regulations take precedence over any information
found in this document.
HUD Reg ion X Environmental Offic e -March 2 015
;
Clear Zones (CZ) and Accident Potential Zones (APZ)
Ch kf f HUD R .bl E . ec tst or or espons1 e ntitv
General requirements Legislation Regulation
Promote compatible land uses Section 2 of the Housing Act of 1949 as 24 CFR Part 51 Subpart D Sec
around civil airports and amended, 42 U.S.C 1331, affirmed by Section Definitions in \Vorksheet
military airfields 2 of the Housing and Urban Development Act .\ppendix A .
of 1969, P.L. No 90-448; Section 7(d) of the 32 CFR Part 256
Deot HUD Act of 1965 , 42 U .S.C. 3535 (d).
1. Does the project include new construction, major rehabilitation, or any other activity which significantly
prolongs the physical or economic life of existing facilities?
0No: STOP here. The project is not subject to the regulations. Record a description of your project and your
determination.
[8JYes: PROCEED to #2
2. ls the Project located within 3000 feet of a civil airport or within 15,000 feet of a military airfield?
O The regulations only apply to military and civil primary and commercial service airports. The Federal
Aviation Administration updates the list of applicable airports annuall y:
http://www.faa.gov/airports _ airtraffic/airports/planning_ capacity/passenger_ allcargo _ stats/passenger ;
D No: STOP here. The project is not within a Clear Zone (also known as Runway Protection Zone) or Accident
Potential Zone. Maintain a list of airports considered and the distance from your project to the covered airport.
Record your determination.
[8JYes: PROCEED to #3 Cedar River Terrace site only; however activities do not involve new construction,
major rehabilitation, or any other activity which significantly prolongs the physical or eco nomic life of existing
facilities.
3. Is the Project in the Clear Zone or Accident Potential Zone'?
O Contact the airport operator and obtain written documentation of the Clear Zone (also known as Runway
Protection Zone) and for military airfields, the Accident Potential Zone, and a determination of whether your
project i s in the APZ or CZ.
[8JNo: STOP here. Maintain the written documentation from the airport operator. Jdentify the location of your
project in relation to the clear zone. Record your determination that the project is not in a CZ or APZ.
0Yes Project is in an Accident Potential Zone: PROCEED TO #4
0Yes Project is in a C lear Zone: PROCEED TO 1/.5
I
Cedar River Terrace site is located outside the area where height restrictions apply per F.\R Part 77 of Renton
\Tunicipal Airport. it is located in the Traffic Pattern Zone (6); future development is s ubject to revie·w and
potential conditions regarding density, notice on titles, and other provisions. No new units or d evelopment arc
proposed on the subject site. Sec RMC 4 -3 -020 Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions .
4. For Accident Potential Zones at Military Airfields, does the project change the use of a facility so that it
becomes one which is no longer acceptable in accordance with Department of Defense standards (Please see 32
CFR Part 256 for Land Use Compatibility Guidelines for Accident Potential Zones), significantly increase the
density or number of people at the site, or introduces explosive, flammable or toxic materials to the area'?
0No: STOP here. Record your determination t hat the project fits under the DoD Land Use Compatibility
Guidelines. Include any correspondence with the Military Airfield.
0Yes: The project cannot be assisted with HUD funds. STOP HERE.
5. For Airport Clear Zones, will the project frequently be used or occupied by people?
0Yes: The project cannot be assisted with HlJD funds. STOP HERE.
0No: Obtain written assurance from the airport operator to the effect that there are no plans to purchase the l and
involved \:v·ith the project as a portion of a Runway Clear Zone or Clear Zone acquisition program. Maintain copies of
all of the documents you have used to make your determination
DISCLAIMER: This document is intended as a tool to help Region X HUD grantees and HUD staff
complete environmental requirements. This document is subject to change. This is not a policy
statement. Legislation and Regulations take precedence over any information found in this document.
Worksheet Appendix A
CFR > Title 24 > Subtitle A > Part 51 > Subpart D > Section 51.301
24 CFR 51.301 -Definitions.
For the purposes of this regulation, the following definitions apply:
(a) Accident Potential Zone. An area at military airfields which is beyond the Clear Zone . The standards for
the Acc iden t Potential Zones are set out in Department of Defense Instruction 4165.57, "Air Installations Compatible
Use Zones," November 8, 1977, 32 CFR part 256. There are no Accident Potential Zones at civil airports.
(b) Airport Operator. The civili an or military agency, group or individual which exercises control over the ope r ations
of the civil airport or mil itary airfield.
(c) Civil Airport. An existing commercia l service airport as designated in the National Plan of Integrated Airport
Systems prepared by the Federa l Aviati on Administration in accordance with section 504 of the Airport and Airway
Improvement Act of 1982.
(d) Runway Clear Zones and Clear Zones. Areas immediately beyond the ends of a runway. The standards for
Runway Clear Zones for civil airports are established by FAA regulation 14 CFR part 152 . The standards for Clear
Zones for military airfields are estab l ished by DOD Instruction 4165.57, 32 CFR part 256 .
Page l of l HUD Region X Environmental Office -June 2011
HUD or Responsible Entity mail Form to:
Ftxlcral Consistency Coordinator
Shorelines & Envirorunental Assistance l'rugram
Ucpartmcnt of Ecology
P .O. Box 47600
Ol)1n pia, WA 98504
Email: ecyrefedpennits@ecy.wa.gov
Phone: (3 60) 407·6068
Department of Ecology please mail l)etermination of
Consistency to: (lnclude Phone number of contact)
Hl.'D Region X Environmcnlal OrliL:c -Mart..:h 201 4
Endangered Species Act No Effect Guidance
for Washington State
(Prepared in collaboration with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
NOAA Fisheries. Applies in Washington State only.)
24 CFR Part 58
General requirements ESA Le2islation HUD Regulations
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act mandates that The Endangered Species 24 CFR 58.S(e)
actions that are authorized, funded, or carried out by Federal Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 24 CFR 50.4(e)
agencies do not jeopardize the continued existence of plants 1531 et seq.; particularly
and animals that are listed or result in the adverse section 7)
modification or destruction of designated critical habitat.
Purpose: The purpose of this check.list is to assist HUD and responsible entities meet their Endangered Species Act
obligations. A determination of "no effect" to federally listed species and critical habitat fulfills HUD 's and the
responsible entity's obligation to ensure actions it authorizes, funds, or carries out do not jeopardize the continued
existence of listed species or adversely modify designated critical habitat. "No effect" determinations do not require
coordination with or approval from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or NOAA Fisheries.
Definition: ";liio effect" -the appropriate determination when the proposed action, including its interrelated and
interdependent actions, will not affect (i.e., influence or bring about any change) listed species or designated critical
habitat either directly or indirectly.
The following questions will help you determine if the proposed project will have an effect to federally listed
species or designated critical habitat. The list of activities is not all-inclusive, but provides examples of typical
types of projects that would meet a "no effect" determination.
1. Does the project consist solely of the following activities: purchasing existing buildings; completing interior
renovations to existing structures; replacement or repairs to existing roofs (not including galvanized material
unless it has been sealed or othenvise confined so that it will not leach into stormwater); replacing exterior paint or
siding on existing buildings; adding sprinkler systems or repairing landscape, not including removing trees or
shrubs?
DY es: STOP here. The project will have No Effect on listed or proposed species, and designated or proposed crit ical
habitat. Consultation with the U.S. Fis h and W ildlife Service and/or NOAA Fisheries is not required. Record your
determination of no effect and maintain th is documentation in your ERR.
[8J No: PROCEED to #2
2. Docs the project consist solely of the any of the following activities and not result in an increase of impervious
surface, removal of trees, or removal of streamside vegetation: rehabilitation of an existing structure;
reconstruction or repair to existing curbs, sidewalks or other concrete structures; repairs to existing parking lots
(for example repairing pot holes or repainting lines -not expansions); purchasing or installing appliances?
DY es: STOP here. The project will have No Effect on listed or proposed species, and designated or proposed critical
h a bitat. Consultation w ith the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or NOAA Fisheries is not required. Record your
determination of no effect and maintain this documentation in your ERR.
[8J No: PROCEED to 11-3
3. If new construction, does construction occur on a previously developed parcel and meet all of the following
criteria: does not add new impervious surfaces; does not remove trees or streamside/riparian vegetation; complies
with all state and local building codes and stormwater regulations; infiltrates all stormwatcr or does not discharge
stormwater to a salmonid-bearing stream or proposed/designated critical habitat.
HUD Reg ion X Environmental Office -.\1ay 2006
DY es: STOP here. The project will have No Effect on listed or proposed species, and designated or proposed critical
habitat. Consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or NOAA Fisheries is not required. Record your
determination of no effect and maintain this documentation, including information about the stormwater discharge, in
your ERR.
1:2:J No: PROCEED to #4
4. If new construction, does construction add new impervious surfaces to a previously developed parcel and meet
all of the following criteria: does not remove trees or streamside/riparian vegetation; complies with all state and
local building codes and stormwater regulations; discharges treated stormwatcr to non-salmonid-bearing stream
within the same subbasin (discharge point must be a minimum of Y.i mile from salmonid bearing stream or
proposed/designated critical habitat) or infiltrates all treated stormwater within the same subbasin.
DY es: STOP here. The project wi ll have No Effect on listed or proposed species, and designated or proposed critical
habitat. Consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or NOAA Fisheries is not required. Record your
determination and maintain this documentation, including information about the stormwater discharge, in your ERR.
[2J No: PROCEED to #5 See attachment.
5. Would project effects, including those that extend beyond the project site (e.g., noise, air pollution, water
quality, stormwater discharge, visual disturbance), overlap with identified federally listed or proposed species
occurrences or designated or proposed critical habitat or potential habitat (e.g., roosting, feeding, nesting,
spawning, rearing, ovenvintering sites, or migratory corridors) for 1isted species'!
For USFWS, please visit the following website to order a site-specific species list from the State Department
of Wildlife and Fish: www.wdhy~~y a .gov/hab/rclcase. The process takes one to eight weeks and costs $40.
For NOAA Fisheries, please visit this website to determine the location of listed species:
\vww .streamnet.or" (click "Interactive Ma er'')
[2JNo: STOP here. The project will have No Effect on listed or proposed species, and designated or proposed critical
habitat. Consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or NOAA Fisheries is not required. Record your
determination of no effect and maintain this documentation in your ERR. Sec attad1mcnt.
0Yes: The project may affect li sted or proposed species, or designated or proposed critical habitat. Consultation with
the USFWS and/or NOAA Fisheries may be required.
Working Toward Recovery: The Endangered Species Act requires that all federal agencies utilize their
authorities to help conserve li sted species. Therefore, as responsible entities, you are encouraged to minimize
the effects of your actions on listed species, designated critical h ab itat and habitat identified in endangered
species recovery plan s. For your activities, you are especially encouraged to minimize your action's
contribution to water quality degradation from point and non-point discharges, and water quantity a lteration
due to increased impervious surfaces. information on low impact development can be found at
w_2vw .e pa .gov/nps/lid/lidlit.hlml.
DISCLAIMER: This document is intended as a tool to help grantees and HUD staff complete NEPA
requirements. This document is subject to change. This is not a policy statement , a nd the Endangered Species
Act and associated regulations take precedence over any information found in this document.
Questions concerning environmental requirements relative to HUD programs can be addressed to Deborah
Peavler-Stewart (206) 220-5414 or Sara Jensen (206) 220-5226.
IIUD Reg ion X Environmental Office -May 2006
Art eri al
-Freeway
streams
Lake
Q Municipal ity * RHA S ites
Sources : I -405, SR 169 to I -90, Renton to Bellevue
Proj ect Environmental Ass essment, March 2006; BERK
Cons ulting 2016
Attachment: Proposal Evaluation July 2016
Hillcrest Terrace and Evergreen Terrace drain to John s Creek that is a
sa lmonid bearing stream. Cole Manor drains to the Cedar River that
is sa lmonid bearing. See sidebar map.
Johns Creek potentially contains Endangered Species of fish; no other
protected fish or wildlife species were found to be affected by a
similar project on the Hillcrest site proposed in 2011 . In that 2011
environmental assessment , due to the application of stormwater
standards and proposed pervious pavement for a portion of the
improvements, no effects were found.
Species protected under the Endangered Species Act under
National Marine Fisheries Service jurisdiction that occur in King
County are identified at http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/ESA-Salmon-
Listinqs/ and include Puget Sound Chinook salmon and Puget
Sound steelhead. The only stream potentially containing these
species in the project area is Johns Creek, which issues from a
storm water discharge culvert approximately 800 feet upstream
of its mouth at Lake Washington. The stream in that reach is at
the grade of Lake Washington and for this reason is not flow
control limited. The stream provides rearing habitat for juvenile
Chinook salmon, which en ter the lower stream from Lake
Wash ington and use it as foraging habitat1. The project area is
located approximately one-half mile east of Johns Creek, and
stormwater originating from the project area is discharged to
the Johns Creek stormwater system. ... the project would not
result in increased runoff relative to current conditions and
would not have the potential to change pollutant loading
relative to current condition; accordingly there is no potential to
affect salmon in Johns Creek .
... Species protected under the Endangered Species Act un de r
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service jurisdiction are identified a t
http://w w w .fws.qov/wafwo/sp<;ciesmap/Kinq082610.pdf and
include Coastal-Puget Sound bull lrout, Canada lynx, gray wolf,
grizzly bear, marbled murreiet, and northern spotted owl. The
distribution of bull tro u t is identified at
hJtfJ :llwww.streamnet .org. . .. A query of the Washington
Department of Fish and Wild!tfe'.5 Priority Habitats and Species
database further showed that none of the named species, nor
any designated or proposed critical habitat for the named
species, occurs within the area of the project and its effects.
~ Hillcrest Terrace Laundry and Resident Community Building
Environmental Assessment, letter of no effect {!CF 2011)
Regarding the Cedar River basin, listed fish species present in the
Cedar River include Chinook salmon and winter stee lhe ad. Bulltrout
are not found in the lower watershed. 2 Based on a review of the
1 Ta bor, R.A. et al. 2006 . Nearshore Habitat Use by Juvenile Chinook Salmon in Len t ic Systems of t he Lake Washington Basin. Lacey,
WA : U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
2 Herrera Environmental Cons ul t ants ct al. June 30, 2016. Draft Cedar River Corridor F.x i sting Conditions Characterization Report.
Prepared for: King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks. Seattle, WA.
I IUD Region X Environmenta l Office -~fay 2006
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Priority Habitats and Species database no listed species or crit ical
habitat is shown on Cole Manor or abutting properties. Southeast of Cole Manor, there is aquatic habitat in the form
of a pond, but no federal or state listed species are identified at that location.
The capital and operating su bsidy projects considered in 2016 for Hillcrest Terrace, Evergreen Terrace, and Co le
Manor are not anticipated to re sult in increased runoff beyond current conditions and would not have the potential
to change pollutant loading relative to current conditions due to: application of surface water and aquifer protection
standards in the Renton Municipal Code, no net increase in impervious area, and no new impervious surfaces
accessible to vehicular traffic. Therefore no effect to listed fish species is anticipated.
• Hillcrest Terrace site includes a new 240 square foot solid waste enclosure (net increase of around 159
square feet of impervious area). ADA ramps would also be added to the property, and depending on
location and site requirements may be pervious or impervious. None of the new impervious surface is
acce ss ible to vehicular traffic and thus it is not pollutant-generating. Sidewalk replacements wou ld be
pervious and offset any other impervious areas added .
• Evergreen Terrace would include ADA improvements such as ramps that may increase impervious area,
while sidewalk replacements would be pervious offsetting any added impervious area. Again, in all cases,
the surfaces are non-pollutant generating surfaces.
• Cole Manor would include ADA improvements including access ramps and a solid waste enclosure with an
improved ramp that would increase impervious area. Sidewalk replacements would be pervious offsetting
any added impervious area. In all cases, the surfaces are non-pollutant generating surfaces.
For all three sites, given that ex is ting sidewalks would be changed to pervious when replaced, there wo uld be an
offset of any minor added impervious surfaces in limited areas (e.g. ramps to/from solid waste enclosures or floor of
solid waste enclosures).
All improvements would be subject to the City's aquifer protection and surface water design manual as appropriate,
and are in loca tions served by public water, sewer, an d storm drainage systems {See RMC 4-3-050 and RMC 4-6-
030). No streams, r ipa rian areas, or wetlands or their buffers would be altered. No tree removal is proposed at this
time; however, any landscaping modifications would comply with the City of Renton's land clearing and tre e cutting
regulations and landscaping standards {seem RMC 4-4-070 and 4-4-130) which i nclude tree protection and
replanting as well as shrub and groundcover standards .
I IUD Region X Environmental Office -May 2006
Explosive and Flammable Operations
24CFR Part 58
General requirements Legislation Regulation
Establish safety standards that can Sec.2 Housing and Urban 24 CFR Part 51 Subpart C
be used as a basis for calculating Development Act of 1969 ( 42
acceptable separation distances for U.S.C. 1441 (a)
assisted prnjects.
1. Does the project include development, construction, rehabilitation or modernization or conversion?
(For modernization and rehabilitation projects, does the work increase residential densities, convert a
building for habitation, or make a vacant building habitable?)
D No: STOP here. The project is not subject to 24 CFR Part 51 C. Record your determination in your
Environmental Review Record (ERR).
~ Yes: PROCEED to #2
2. Are there aboveground storage tanks within 1 mile of the project site more than 100 gallons in size? Are
there plans to install such aboveground storage tanks within 1 mile of the project site? (HUD's stated
position is that 24 CFR Part 51 C does not apply to storage tanks ancillary to the operation of the
assisted 1-4 family residence, for example the home heating or power source. It does apply to all other
tanks, includin tanks for nei hborin 1-4 famil residences.
Maintain documentation supporting your determination in your ERR. Documentation could include a
finding by a qualified data source (i.e. Fire Marshall etc ... ), copies of pictures, maps, and/or internet data.
TIP: You do not have to consider all tanks at all sizes within I mile of your project. Screen further by
determining the Acceptable Separation Distance for specific tank sizes and using that information to narrow
your search. For instance, the maximum ASD for a 100 gallon tank is 115 feet. You do not need to map
100 gallon tanks farther than 115 feet from your project site. Find the list of ASDs by tank size in Appendix
Chere: htms://www .hud~,x~ha nge.info /_res ources/d o cumcnts/Accep table-S ep arati on-Dis tance -G uidebook-
A e n dix-C. df
~ No : STOP here. The project is not s ubject to 24 CFR Part 5 1 C. Record your determination that there arc no
storage tanks within one mile of the project site in your ERR. Sec F.DR rcpo1is available with
Environmental Rcvic·w Record.
D Yes: PROCEED to #3
3. ls the Separation Distance from the pro.iect acceptable based on standards in 24 CFR 51 C?
Use the online tool to calculate ASD: ht tm;:/lwww.h udc xc han_g_c .info/c nvi ro nrnc ntal-rcv iew/a s d-calc u lato r/
or use the HUD guidebook, "Acceptable Separation Distance Guidebook which is available at:
https ://www.hudcxc hangc.info/rcsourcc/2762/acccpta bl c-scparation-d istancc-guidcbook/
D Yes: STOP here. Include maps and your separation distance calculations in your ERR.
D No: PROCEED to #4
4. With mitigation, can the Separation Distance become acceptable?
0 No: PROJECT IS NOT ACCEPT ABLE-DO NOT FUND
D Yes: STOP here. Maintain documentation supporting your determination in your ERR. Documentation could
include a finding by a qualified data source (i.e., Fire Marshall etc.), copies of pictures, maps, technical
calcu lations and information describing the mitigation measures taken.
DISCLAIMER: This document is intended as a tool to help Region X
HUD grantees and HUD staff complete environmental requirements.
This document is subject to change. This is not a policy statement.
Legislation and Regulations take precedence over any information
found in this document.
I IUD Region X Environmental Office -April 2015
Farmland Protection
ec st or or espons1 e ntitv Ch kli t HUD R "bl E .
General requirements Legislation Regulation
The Farmland Protection Policy Fannland Protection Policy Act 7 CFR Part 658
Act discourages Federal of 1981 (7 U.S.C. 4201 et seq.)
activities that would convert
fannland to nonagricultural
purposes.
1. Does your project include new construction, acquisition of undeveloped land or change in use
of land or property.
D Yes: PROCEED to #2
[2J No: STOP here. The Farmland Protection Policy Act does not apply. Record your detennination
All sites consist of already-developed multi-family residential properties.
::J Maintain, in your ERR, a determination that the project does not include new construction,
acquisition of undeveloped land or change in use of a property
2. Docs your project meet one of the following exemptions?
• Construction limited to on-farm structures needed for farm operations.
• Construction limited to new m inor se condary (ac cessory) structur es such as a garage or storage
she d
• Project on land used for water storage or already in or committed urban development (t his
includes land with a density of 30 structures per 40 acre area. It also includes lands identified
as "urbani z ed area" (UA) on the Census Bureau Map, or as urban area mapped with a "tint
overprint" on the USGS topographical maps, or as "urban built-up" on the USDA Important
Farmland Maps. Please note that land "zoned" for development, i.e . non-agricultural use, does
not exempt a project from compliance with the FPPA).
D Yes: STOP here. The Farmland Protection Policy Act docs not apply. Record your determination
0 Maintain, in your ERR, documentation to evidence the project meets one of the exemptions.
If the project is already in urban development provide a map as described above with your site
marked or documentation from another credible source.
D No: PROCEED to #3
3 . Does "important farmland" regulated under the Farmland Protection Policy Act occur on the
project site? This includes prime farmland, unique farmland and/or land of statewide or local
importance
You may use the links below to determine if important farmland occurs on the project site:
• Utilize USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service's (NRCS) Web Soil Survey
http://webso il su r vey .nrcs.us da .gov /app/HomePM._Q-'_b_tm
HUD Region X Environmental Office -April 20 15
• Check with your city or county 's planning department and ask them to document if the project
is on land regu lated by the FPPA (zoning important farmland as non-agricultural does not
exempt it from FPPA r equirements)
• Contact NRCS at the local USDA service center
http ://officcs.sc .cgov.usda.gov/locator/app?agcncy=nrcs for assistance
D No: STOP here. The project does not convert farmland to nonagricultural purposes. Record your
determination on the Statutory Worksheet and attach documentation used to make your
determination
D Yes: PROCEED to #4
4. Consider alternatives to completing the project on important farmland and means of
avoiding impacts to important farmland.
Complete form AD -I 006, "Farmland Conversion Impact Rating" and contact the state soil scientist
before sending it to the local NRCS District Conservationist. Work with NRCS to minimize the
impact of the project on the protected farmland.
Return a copy of Form 1006 to the USDA-NRCS State Soil Scientist or his/her designee informing
them of your determination once you have finished the analysis.
Record your determination on the Statutory Worksheet and attach documentation used to make
your determination. Include any mitigation required in the review.
DISCLAIMER: This document is intended as a tool to help Region X HUD
grantees and HUD staff complete environmental requirements. This
document is subject to change. This is not a policy statement, and the
Farmland Protection Legislation and Regulations take precedence ove r any
information found in this document.
HUD Region X Environmental Office -April 2015
i
I
!
t
,'
t
Floodplain Management
ec s or or espons1 e ntJtv Ch kli t t HUD R ·ht E .
General requirements Legislation Regulation
A void the adverse impacts Executive Order I 1988, May 24 24 CFR Part 55
associated with the occupancy 1977
and modification of floodplains.
A void floodplain development
whenever there are practicable
alternatives.
1. ls the Project located in a floodway or a 100 or 500-year flood plain?
-~1{~~(:"!:"!,,,, '~~ ,~'!¥'~
J For projects in areas mapped by FEMA, maintain the FEMA map panel that includes your project site.
Make sure to include the map panel number and date. If FEMA information is unavailable or insuffi c iently
detailed, other Federal, state, tribal or local data may be used as 'best available information.' However, a base
flood elevation from an interim or preliminary or non-FEMA source cannot be used if it is lower than the
current FIRM and FIS. Include documentation, including a discussion of why this is the best available
information for the site.
.
' !
' '·'>:"
LJ No : STOP here. The Floodplain Management regulations do not apply. Record your determination that the
project is not in a floodplain or floodway.
D Yes-Floodway. STOP. The National Flood Insurance Program prohibits federal financial assistance
for use in a floodway. The only exception is for functionally dependent uses, such as a marina, a port
facility, a waterfront park, a bridge or a dam. If your project is a functionally dependent use in a floodway,
proceed to #3
[gl Yes-500-year flood plain (Zone B or X on FEMA maps or best information). PROCEED to #2 Cedar
River Terrace onlv.
D Yes-100 Year tlo~d plain (Zone A or Von FEMA maps or best information). PROCEED to #3
D Yes-Flood prone area. PROCEED to #3
2. For projects in the 500-year flood plain: Does your project involve a critical action, defined as an
activity for which even a slight chance of flooding would be too great because it might result in loss of
life, injury or property damage? Specific examples include:
• Structures or facilities that produce, use or store highly volatile, flammable, explosive, toxic or
water-reactive materials.
• Strnctures or facilities that provide essential and irreplaceable records or uti lity or emergency
services that may become lost or inoperative during flood and storm events (e.g., data storage
centers, generating plants, principal utility lines, emergency operations centers in cluding fire and
police stations, and roadways providing sole egress from flood-prone areas).
• Structures or facilities that are likely to contain occupants who may not be sutl!cicntly mobile to
avoid loss of life or injury during flood or storm events, e.g. persons who reside in hospitals, nursing
homes, convalescent homes, intermediate care facilities, board and care facilities, and retirement
service centers. Housing for independent living for the elderly is not considered a critical action.
rgj No: STOP here. The project can proceed without further analysis. Record your determination and attach
flood plain map and documentation that project does not involve a critical action. Dwelling and site
maintenance and rl'ltalJilitation is proposed on already-developed 11ites; no critkal :1ctions ar-e
inYolvcd.
D Y cs: PROCEED to 113
3. Does your project meet one of the categories of proposed action for which Part 55 does not apply?
(Below are several common exemptions please see 24 CfR 55. 12( c) for additional categories of proposed
action)
• The approval of financial assistance for restoring and preserving the natural and beneficial functions
and values of floodplains and wetlands but only other certain further conditions (see 24 CFR
55(c)(3).
• A minor amendment to a previously approved action with no additional adverse impact on or from a
floodplain.
• Approval of a project site, an incidental portion of which is situated in an adjacent floodplain, but
only with certain further conditions (see 24 CFR 55.12(c)(6)).
• A project on any site in a floodplain for which FEMA has issued a final Letter of Map Amendment
or Letter of Map Revision that removed the property from a FEMA-designated floodplain location.
• A project on any site in a floodplain for which FEMA has issued a conditional LOMA or LOMR if
the approval is subject to the requirements and conditions of the conditional LOMA or LOMR.
• Special Projects directed to the removal of material and architectural barriers that restrict the
mobility of and accessibility to elderly and persons with disabilities.
D Yes: Stop here. Record your determination that the project is exempt from floodplain management
regulations per 24 CFR 55 .12( c ). Maintain copies of all of the documents you have used to make your
determination. Please note that you may still have to maintain flood insurance on the project per the Flood
Disaster Protection Act.
D No: Proceed to #4.
4 . Does your project meet one of the categories of proposed action for which the 8-step decision making
process does not apply? (Below are several common exemptions-please see 24 CFR 55.12(b) for
additional categories of proposed action)
• financial assistance for the purchasing, mortgaging or refinancing of existing one-to-four family
properties under certain conditions (24 CFR 55(b)(l))
• Financial assistance for minor repairs or improvements on one-to-four-family properties that do not
meet the thresholds for 'substantial improvement' 1
• Disposition of individual HUD-acquired one-to-four-family properties.
• HUD guarantees under the Loan Guarantee Recovery Fund Program under certain conditions (see 24
CFR 55 .12(b)(4).
• Leasing an existing structure in the floodplain but only under certain conditions (see 24 CFR
55.12(b)(5))
D Yes: Stop here. Record your determination that the project is exempt from the 8-step process as per 24
CFR 55.12(b). Maintain copies of all of the documents you have used to make your determination .
Please note that you may still have to maintain flood insurance on the project per the Flood Disaster
Protection Act. Please also note that notification of floodplain hazard requirements at 24 CFR 55.21 may
apply.
D No: Proceed to #5 .
5. Does your project meet one of the categories of proposed action for which a limited 8-step process
applies? (please see 24 CFR 55.12(a) for more details)
• Disposition of acquired multifamily housing projects or acquired one-to-four family properties where
communities are in good standing in the NFIP program.
• HUD's actions under the National Housing Act for purchase or refinance of existing multifamily
housing projects, hospitals, nursing homes, assisted living facilities, board and care facilities , and
intermediate care facilities, in communities that are in good standing under the NFIP.
• Actions under any HUD program involving the repair, rehabilitation, modernization, weathcrization, or
improvement of existing multifamily housing projects, nursing homes, assisted living facilities, boa rd
and care facilities, intermediate car facilities and one-to-four family properties in communities in the
Regular Program of the NFTP and in good standing, units arc not increased more than 20 percent, the
action does not invol ve a conversion from nonresidential to residential land use, the action does not
meet the thre sholds for 'substantial improvement ' 1 and the fooll)rinl of the structure and paved areas is
not sif:,'llificantly increased.
HU O Region X Environmental Office March 2014
• Actions under any HUu program involving the repair, rehabilitatiou, modernization, weatherization, or
improvement of existing nonresidential buildings and structures in communities in the Regular Program
of the NFIP and in good standing, the action does not meet the thresholds for 'substantial
improvement' 1 and the footprint of the structure is not significantly increased.
D Yes: Complete the 5-step decision-making process for floodplains. You do not have to publish the notices
in steps 2 or 7 or do an analysis of a lternati ves in Step 3. Analyze potential direct and indirect impacts (step 4);
design or modify to minimize potential impacts (step 5); reevaluate the proposed action to determine if action is
still practicable (step 6).
• lf still practicable, document your analysis in the file and move forward.
• lf not still practicable, either reject or modify project.
D No: Proceed to #6.
6. Are there practicable alternatives to locating your project in the floodplain?
• HUD strongly discourages use of funds for projects that do not meet an exemption in Part 55.12.
Reject the Project Site or Request a Letter of Map Amendment or Revision (LOMA/R) from
.
1 FEMA. If you decide to consider the project you must determine if there are alternatives by
completing the 8-step decision-making process described in 24 CFR Section 55.20. Please note that ,
: requesting a LOMA/R or completing the 8 step process take time and resources. The 8-step decision-
making process requires two public notice and comment periods.
'·
You must also maintain flood insurance on the project per the Flood Disaster Protection Act.
D Yes : Reject or modify project.
D No: Document your analysis, including floodplain notices, in your Environmental Review Record.
You must notify any private party participating in a financial transaction for the property of the hazards
of the floodplain location before the execution of documents completing the transaction. (24 CFR
Section 55.2 l)
DISCLAJMER: This document is intended as a tool to help HUD Region X
grantees and HUD staff complete environmental requirements. This
document is subject to change. This is not a policy statement, and the
Floodplain Executive Order and Regulations take precedence over any
information found in this document.
HUD Region X Environmental Office -\,1arch 2014
I
I
t Substantial Improvement means any repair, reconstruction, modernization or improvement of a structure, the cost of
which equals or exceeds 50% of the market value of the structure either before the improvement or repair started or if the
structure has been damaged before the damage occurred OR any repair reconstrnction etc. that results in an increase of
more than 20% of dwelling units or peak number of customers and employees (24 CFR 55.2(b)(8)
HUD Region X E nvironmental Office March 2014
Environmental Justice
General re uiremcnts
Address disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects on
mmon and low-income o ulations.
Executive Order 12898,
February 11, 2004
24 CFR 50.4(1) and 24
CFR 58.5(j).
1. ls there an adverse environmental impact caused by the proposed action, or is the proposed action
subject to an adverse environmental impact?
This question is designed to determine how the Environmental Justice analysis is reflected in the environmental
review as a whole. Your consideration of the other environmental l aws and authorities is your supporting
documentation for this question. If any other environmental law or authority required mitigation (i.e., 8-step
process for locating in a flood plain, waiver of noise requirements), then there is an adverse environmental impact.
[8JNo: STOP here. The project does not pose an Environmental Justice concern. Proposed rehabilitation
will imprnve the quality of the indoor environment for residents (e.g. removal of asbestos containing
material), and will also improve access for rldcrly and disabled residents (e.g. ADA impnncmcnts).
'{ o ad rrrsc environmental impacts arc anticipated.
0Yes: PROCEED to #2
2. Will the project have a disproportionate impact on low-income or minority populations'?
""'
The following steps will help you make this determination:
l) Describe the project.
2) Consider historic uses of the site, past land uses and patterns (such as lending discrimination and
exclusionary zoning).
3) Determine the demographic profile of the people using the project and/or living and working in the
vicinity of the project. EPA's environmental justice geographic assessment tool provides helpful
demographic information: http:.i/epamap 14 .epa. gov/e jm a p/e nt ry. html
4) Describe the adverse environmental impact you identified in your environmental review. Identify adjacent
land uses , paying particular attention t o toxic sites, dumps, incinerators, hazardous materials ( e.g.
asbestos), and other issues with the potentia l to have adverse human health effects . (This may a lready have
been considered in your review of toxic and hazardous substances.)
5) Consider how t he adverse environmental impact and any potentially harmful adjacent land uses would
impact the people us ing and/or surrounding the project.
6) Consider whether market-rate development ex ists in the area. If not, would thi s project succeed as a
market-rate project at the proposed site?
0No: STOP here. Maintain documentation concerning your determination of no disproportionate impact.
DY cs: Co ns ult with HUD environmental staff to develop a mitigation plan. An Env ironmental Justice
mitigation plan must include public outreach , participation and community in vo lvement. The project can not
move forward until the EJ issue is mitigated to the satisfaction of HUD or the Responsible Entity and the
impacted community.
DISCLAIMER: This document is intended as a tool to help Region X HUD
grantees and HUD staff complete environmental requirements. This
document is subject to change. This is not a policy statement. Legislation
and Regulations take precedence over any information found in this
document.
IIUD Regio n X En v ironmental Office June 2 01 2
Noise Abatement and Control
Checklist for HUD or Responsible Entity
General requirements Legislation Regulation
Encourage land use patterns for Noise Control Act of 1972 24 CFR Part 51 Subpart B
housing and other noise sensitive The Quiet Communities Act of 1978 Noise Guidebook
urban needs that will provide a as amended
suitable separation behveen them 0MB Circular 75-2 , "Comparable
and major noise sources Land Uses at Federal Airfields"
1. Is the project for new construction, purchase or resale of existing, modernization, or
rehabilitation of noise sensitive use (i.e., housing, mobile home parks, nursing homes, hospitals,
and other non-housing uses where quiet is integral to the project's function, e.g., libraries)?
0No: STOP here. The project is not subject to the noise standards. Maintain documentation on the
nature of the project. Record your determination that the project is not subject to the noise standards in
your Environmental Review Record (ERR).
[8JYes: PROCEED to #2 :\1odernization of unit interiors and exterior pedestrian paths.
2. Is the project located within 1,000 feet of a busy road or highway, 3,000 feet of a railroad, or 15
miles of a civil airport or military airfield? Are there any other potential noise sources in the
project vicinity that could produce a noise level above HUD's acceptable range, including but
not Limited to concert halls, night clubs, event facilities, etc .... ?
0No: STOP here. Maintain a map identifying distances from roads, railroads and airports and your
project. Record your determination. You do not need to calculate a specific noise level.
[SJ Yes: PROCEED to #3 Evergreen Terrace is within 1,001.1 feet of SR 900 and Cole :\1 anor is within
1.000 feet of NF. 3rd Street. Both arc principal arterials.
3. Determine the actions to take based on the project and HUD Acceptability Standards.
Is the activity for:
D Construction of new noise sensitive use. Calculate noise using HUD standards or online tool:
https:/./www .hudcxchangc.info/cnvironmcntal-rcvicw/dnl-cakulator PROCEED to 3.a
D Purchase or resale of existing buildings (existing buildings are either more than 1 year old or
buildings for which this is the second or subsequent purchaser). Noise calcul ation is not required.
HUD or RE determines need based on their evaluation of project. Proceed to 3.b
[8JModerni:zation. No ise calculation is not required. HUD or RE determines need based on their
evaluation of project. Proceed to 3.c The level of capital investment in relation to the buildings
and site'J is anticipated to be modernization and not major or substantial rehabilitation.
0Major or substantial rehabilitation 1 (use the definition contained in the specific program
guidelines). Calculate noise using HUD standards or online tool:
https:/i www.hudexchange.info/cn vironmcntal-rcvicwi dnl -calculator Proceed to 3.d
1 Peavlcrstewart, Deborah , HCD Region 10, Wednesday, July 20, 2016, email to Lisa Grneter, BERK Consulting:
am not aware of a definition of either of the terms in the Capital Fund o r Operating Subsidy program. Without a
s pecific definition l generally suggest that HUD or the Responsible Entity use the definition in the floodplain
regulations that substantial improvement means any repair, r econstruction, modernization or improvement of a
strncture, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the improvement
or repair is started.
I of3 HUD Region X Environmental Office -February 2015
Noise Abatement and Control
Checklist for HUD or Responsible Entity
HUD General Acceptability Standards
HUD determination Day night average sound level in decibels (dB)
Acceptable N ot exceeding 65 dB
Normally Unacceptable Above 65 dB but not exceeding 75dB
New Construction Not appli c able
Is the Da y-Night average sound level:
0 Above 75 dB. Construction of new noise sensitive uses is generally prohibited, an EIS is required
prior to the app roval. The Assistant Secretary or Certifying Officer may waive the EIS requirement
in cases w here noise is the only environmental issue and no outdoor s ensitive activity w ill take place
on the site. (U nder § Part 50 approval is required o f the A ss ista nt Secretary fo r CPD, under § Part 58
the Certi fy ing Officer mus t prov ide approval). The project must be mitigated to acceptable
st andanrds. Document the ERR with th e noise calculation, E IS, E IS waiver i f approved, mitigation
requirements and when complete, evidence of miti gation ..
0 Above 65 dB but not exceeding 75 dB . Construction of new noise sen sitive uses is discouraged -
all new p rojects require sp ecial environmental reviews and may require s pec ia l approvals prior to
con struction (exce p t when the threshold has been s hifted to 7 0 dB as described below). Information
is provided a t 51. l 04 (b )(I ). Document ERR include the n o is e calculation, sp ec ia l review and
approval. Document mitigation requirements and when complete, evidence of mitigation.
D Not exceeding 65 dB. (this threshold m ay be s hifted to 7 0 dB on a case-by -case basis when 6 sp ecific
conditions are satisfied as described at Section 51.l 05(a)). Noise level s are acceptable. Document
the noise calculati on in the ERR
b. Purchase o r Resale of Existing Building ~ot applicabl e
Is the Day -Night average sound level above an acceptable leve l (based on noi se calculation or
your analysis of the site using maps or a site visit)?
0Yes. Consider environmental n oise as a marketability factor when considering the amount of
ins urance o r assis tance tha t will be provided to the project? Noise exposure by itse lf w ill not result in
the denia l of H UD support for t he resale and purchase of otherwise accep table existing buildin gs .
Record your determinat ion in the ERR.
0No. Record your determination in the E RR
c. Modernization
Is the Day -Nig ht average sound level above an acceptable level (based on noi se calculation or
your analysis of the site using maps or a site visit)?
[8JYes. Encourage noise aucnuation features in a lterati ons. Record your determination in the ERR .
Id entify how you a re e ncouraging noise a ttenuation .
. \pplyin~ the'\ car 2030 \'Olumcs anticipated in the 2011 S u nset Arca Community Planned .\ctio n
~F:PAiSEPA ElS (study an'a includes h-crgrccn Terrace property), the calculat<.'d D:\L is 59.1.
l'his is within the 11 l ID determination of acccptahk.
Based on City of Rent.on 2012 ro adway volumes on NE 3 .. " abutting Cole \lanor l o the south. and a
percent of trucks \imilar to other freight class roads in Renton (average 4°1.)). the U:'\lL is 68.S. This
is normally unacccpti1hk, but docs not e\cccd 75dh.
2 of 3 HUD Region X Environmen tal O ffic e -February 2015
Noise Abatement and Control
Checklist for HUD or Responsible Entity
Brick exterior \YiJI remain , and the dwelling units and windows arc currently oriented away from
the road. The siding hctwet·n the eaves and brick facing w ill be replaced. Efforts to be taken to
incorporate noise attenuation at Cole Manor are to seek the highest STC rated concrete board that
meets capital facility needs and resources. Ratings of Hardie board are found here:
http://www.jameslrnrdie.com/pdf/tedrnical-bulletin-07272007 .pdf. Sec also !:ilJJ) Noise Guideboo~
and Sound Transmission Classification Assessment Tool.
0No. Record your detennination in the ERR
d. Major or Substantial Rehabilitation
Is the Day-Night average sound level:
0Above 75 dB. HUD or the RE shall actively seek to have project sponsors incorporate noise
attenuation features, given the extent and nature of the rehabilitation being undertaken and the level
of exterior noise exposure and will strongly encourage conversion of the noise exposed sites to land
uses compatible with the high noise levels. Document the ERR include the noise calculation and
efforts taken to encourage noise attenuation .
0 Above 65 dB but not exceeding 75 dB. HUD or the RE shall actively seek to have project sponsors
incorporate noise attenuation features, given the extent and nature of the rehabilitation being
undertaken and the level of exterior noise exposure Document ERR include the noise caluclation and
efforts taken to encourage noise attenuation.
D Not exceeding 65 dB. (this threshold may be shifted to 70 dB on a case-by-case basis when 6 s pecific
conditions are satisfied as described at Section 51.105(a)). Noise level s are acceptable. Document
the ERR with the noi s e calculation.
3 of 3 I ! UD R egion X Environmenta 1 0 fficc -F cbruary 201 5
Environmental Review Main (/programs/enviro nmental-review/)
DNL Calculator
The Day/Night Noise Level Calculator is an electronic assessment tool that calculates the Day/Night Noise Level
(DNL) from roadway and railway traffic. For more information on using the DNL calcu lator, view the Day/Night
Noise Level Calculator Electronic Assessment Tool Overview (https://onecpd.info/programs/environmental-
review/daynight-noise-level-electronic-assessment-tool/).
Guidelines
• To display the Road and/or Rail DNL calculator(s), click on the "Add Road Source" and/or "Add Rail
Source" button(s) below.
• All Road and Rail input va lues must be positive non-decimal numbers.
• All Road and/or Rail DNL value(s) must be calculated separately before calculating the Site DNL.
• All checkboxes that apply must be checked for vehicles and trains in the tables' headers.
• Note #1: Tooltips, containing field specific information, have been added in this tool and may be accessed
by hovering over all the respective data fields (site identification, roadway and railway assessment, DNL
calculation results, roadway and railway input variables) with the mouse.
• Note #2: DNL Calculator assumes roadway data is always entered.
DNL Calculator
Site ID WA011000003
Record Date 07/19/2016
User's Name Lisa Grueter
Road # 1 Name: SR900
Road #1
Vehicle Type Cars ~ Medium Trucks ~ Heavy Trucks "
Effective Distance 285 285 285
Distance to Stop Sign
Ave rage Speed 35 35 35
Average Daily Trips (ADT) 26068 399 133
Night Fraction of ADT 15 15 15
Road Gradient(%) 2
Vehicle DNL 57.
Calculate Road #1 DNL · 59.1
Add Road Source Add Rail Source
Airport Noise Level
Loud Impulse Sounds?
Combined DNL for all
Road and Rail sources
Combined DNL including Airport
Site DNL with Loud Impulse Sound
• Calculate ·
Mitigation Options
0
Yes No
39
Reset ;
~,.. j
If your site DNL is in Excess of 65 decibels, your options are :
• No Action Alternative: Cancel the project at th is location
• Other Reasonable Alternatives: Choose an alternate site
• Mitigation
54.
a Contact your Field or Regional Environmental Officer
(https://www.onecpd.info/programs/environmental-review/hud-environmental-staff-contacts/)
a Increase mitigation in the building walls (only effective if no outdoor, noise s e nsitive areas)
a Reconfigure the site plan to increase the distance between the noise source and noise-sensitive
uses
a Incorporate natural or man-made barriers. See The Noise Guide book
( https:l/www. one cpd. infolresource/313/h ud-noise -guidebookl)
a Construct noise barrier. See the Barrier Performance Module
(https://onecpd.info /programs /environmental-review/bpm-calculator/)
Tools and Guidance
Day/Night Noise Level Assessment Tool User Guide (https://www.onecpd .info/resource/3822 /day-night-noise-
level-assessment-tool-u ser-guide/)
Day/Night Noise Level Assess ment Tool Flowcharts (https://www.onecpd.info/resource /3823/day-night-nois e-
level-assessment-tool-flowcharts/)
Environmental Review Main (/prugrams/environmenta l-review/)
DNL Calculator
The Day/Night Noise Level Calculator is an e lectronic assessment tool that calculates the Day/Night Noise Level
(DNL) from roadway and railway traffic. For more information on using the DNL calculator, view the Day/Night
Noise Level Calculator Electronic Assessment Tool Overview (https://onecpd.info/programs/environmental-
review/dayn ig ht-noise-level-electronic-assessment-tool/).
Guidelines
• To display the Road and/or Rail DNL calculator(s), click on the "Add Road Source" and/or "Add Rail
Source" button(s) below.
• All Road and Rail input values must be positive non-decimal numbers.
• All Road and/or Rail DNL val ue(s) must be calculated separately before calculating the Site DNL.
• All checkboxes that apply must be checked for vehicles and trains in the tables' headers.
• Note #1: Tooltips, conta ining field specific information, have been added in this tool and may be accessed
by hovering over all the respective data fields (site identification, roadway and railway assessment, DNL
calculation results, roadway and railway input variables) with the mouse.
• Note #2: DNL Calculator assumes roadway data is always entered.
DNL Calculator
Site ID WA011000005
Record Date 07 /20/2016
User's Name Lisa Grueter
Road # 1 Name: NE 4th 2012 ADT
Road #1
Vehicle Type Cars " Medium Trucks " Heavy Trucks ""
Effective Distance 88 88 88
Distance to Stop Sign
Average Speed 35 35 35
Average Daily Trips (ADT) 28224 882 294
Night Fraction of ADT 15 15 15
Road Gradient (%) 2
Vehicle DNL 65.
Calculate Road #1 DNL · 68.5
Add Road Source Add Rail Source
Airport Noise Level
Loud Impulse Sounds?
Combined DNL for all
Road and Rail sources
Combined DNL including Airport
Site DNL with Loud Impulse Sound
. Calculate •
Mitigation Options
0
50.1
Reset :
Yes No
If your site DNL is in Excess of 65 decibels, your options are:
• No Action Alternative: Cancel the project at this location
• Other Reasonable Alternatives: Choose an alternate site
• Mitigation
o Contact your Field or Regional Environmental Officer
65.
( https ://www. onecpd. i nfo/p rog rams/environ men ta I-re view/h u d-environ me nta I-staff-contacts/)
o Increase mitigation in the building walls (only effective if no outdoor, noise sensitive areas)
o Reconfigure the site plan to increase the distance between the noise source and noise-sensitive
uses
o Incorporate natural or man-made barriers. See The Noise Guidebook
(https:l/www. one cpd. in folresource/313/hud-noise-guidebookl)
o Construct noise barrier. See the Barrier Performance Module
( https :// one cpd. info/p rag ram s/e nvi ran men ta 1-review/b pm-calculator/)
Tools and Guidance
Day/Night Noise L eve l Assessment Tool User Guide (https://www.onecpd.info/resource/3822/day-night-noise-
level-assessment-tool-user-guide/)
Day/Night Noise Level Assessment Tool Flowcharts (https://www.onecpd.info/resource/3823/day-night-noise-
level-assessment-tool-flowcharts/)
Sole Source Aquifers
Checklist for HUD or Responsible Entitv
General requirements Legislation Regulation
Protect drinking water systems which Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 40 CFR 149.2
arc the sole or principal drinking water ( 42 U.S.C.201, 300 et seq., and 21
source for an area and which, if U.S.C. 349)
contaminated, would create a
significant hazard to public health.
1. Is the project located on a sole source aquifer (SSA} review area which includes the aquifer and
streamflow source areas? (Note: There arc currently no sole source aquifers in Alaska.}
"l"""t.._.,,,,. f'i q&; ~ ~"YM#dl~'>Jl>:~-4"
O Maintain, in your ERR, a copy of the latest SSA review area map, marked with your project location.
http://vosemite.epa.2:ovi rlO/water.ns£-Sole+Source--Aquifcrs/ssamaps
Make sure you consider streamflow source areas.
D No: STOP here. T he Sole Source Aquifer authority does not apply. Record your determination.
[8J Yes: PROCEED to #2
Cuk '.\J;mo r. Gol<il'n Pine-;. :md Cl'dar Riwr Terrace :i r e located in ·the A,1uit'cr Arca or Sou rce Ai·fa of the Cedar \'alley sole ,ourcl' a,1uifer. See
m,1p in App<'nrlix . '\o e,tcrior altcrntions arr proposcn for Colden Pines or Cedar Rh·cr Tcrrncc. Col<' \lano r is ,1ddr<',.,cd in quc,tion 5 below.
2. Is the project located in Idaho?
D Yes: Follow the 2000 Sole Source Aquifer Memorandum of Understanding between HUD/Idaho Division
of Commun ity Development/Idaho Housing and Finance Association and EPA. Record your determination
on the Statutory Worksheet.
[8J No: PROCEED to #3
3. Does the project consist of an individual action on a one-to-four unit residential building (including
acquisition, disposition, new construction and rehabilitation) that meets all applicable local and state
groundwater regulations?
D Yes: STOP here. The project is not likely to affect Sole Source Aquifer quality. Record your determination
on the Statutory Worksheet.
[8:JNo: PROCEED to #4
4. Does the project consist of acquisition, disposition or rehabilitation of a multifamily (5 or more
dwelling units) residential building, commercial building or public facility that does not increase size
or capacity and meets all applicable local and state groundwater regulations'?
0 Yes: STOP here. The project is not likely to affect Sole Source Aquifer quality. Record your determination
o n the Statutory Worksheet. The proposal is a combination of rehabilitation o f facilities that do not
increase siJ'.CS of improvements and those that do.
0No: PROCEED to #5
5. Does the project consist of new construction or rehabilitation that increases size or capacity of a
multifamily building, commercial building or public facility that meets all applicable local/state
ground-water regulations AND is served by public water, sewer and storm drainage systems. (If the
project uses well water or a septic system or infiltrates storm-water on site, you must proceed to Step #6.)
[8:JYes: STOP here. The project is not likely to affect Sole Source Aquifer quality. Record your determination
on the Statutory Worksheet. Sizes of residential structures ,,ill stay the same. Sizes of public facilities
may expand impervious area (e.g. ADA improvements) or replace impervious area (e.g. sidewalks). h
is anticipated that sidewalk replacements will be pcrvious leading to no-net-increase in
impervious area. All impro,,cments arc ~ubjcct to th e City's aquifer protection re~ulations, surface
water design manual, consi'>t of non-pollutant generating surfaces, and are in locations served by
puhlic water, sewer. and storm drainage systems.
0No: PROCEED to #6
1 of2 HUD Region X Environmental Office -May 2013
6. Submit your project to E ... for review.
Include the following information:
1. Location of Project and name of Sole Source Aquifer.
2. Project description and federal funding source.
3. Is there any increase of impervious s urface? If so, what is the area?
4. Describe how storm water is currently treated on the site.
5 . How will storm water be treated on this site during construction and after the project is complete?
6 . Are there any underground storage tanks present or to be installed? Include details of such tanks.
7. Will there be any liquid or solid waste generated? If so how will it be disposed of?
8. What is the depth of excavation?
9. Are there any wells in the area that may provide direct routes for contaminates to access the aquifer and
how close are they to the project?
I 0. Are there any hazardous waste sites in the project area .... especially if the waste site has an underground
plume with monitoring wells that may be disturbed? Include details.
11. Are there any deep pilings that may provide access to the aquifer?
12. Are Best Management Practices planned to address any possible risks or concerns?
13. Is there any other information that could be helpful in determining if this project may have an affect on
the aquifer?
14. Does this Project include any improvements that may be beneficial to the aquifer, s uch as improvements
to the wastewater treatment plan?
Submit the in formation to Susan Eastman at ca snng_n.su san@;ep a.gov , phone number (206) 553-6249, for EPA
approval of the project. Please note that EPA may request add itional information if impacts to the aquifer are
questionable after the information is submitted for review.
D EPA approves project: Stop here. The project is not likely to affect Sole Source Aquifer quality.
Maintain copies of all of the documents you have used to make your determination and your correspondence
with EPA.
D EPA objects to project: Continue working with EPA to mitigate issues. You may need to hire a technical
consultant or request EPA to conduct an independent review of the proposed project for impacts to ground water
quality. lf EPA determines that the project continues to pose a significant contaminant hazard to public health,
federal financial assistance must be denied.
2 of2
DISCLAIMER: This document is intended as a tool to help Region X HUD
grantees and HUD s taff complete environmental requirements. This
document is subject to change. This is not a policy statement, and the Sole
Source Aqu ifer Legislation and Regulations take precedence over any
information found in this document.
HUD Region X Environmental Office -May 2013
Toxic emicals and Radioacth lllaterials
24 CFR Part 58
General requirements Lefislation Re2ulation
All property proposed for use in HUD programs must be Comprehensive Environmental 24 CFR 58.S(i)
free of hazardous materials, contamination, toxic Response, Compensation, and
chemicals and gasses and radioactive substances, where Liability Act of I 980 as amended
a hazard could affect the health and safety of occupants by Superfund Amendments and
or conflict with the intended utilization of the property. Reauthorization Act
You are required to consider all hazards that could affect the health and safety of occupants and
use current techniques by qualified professionals to undertake investigations determined
necessary. This checklist tool is intended as guidance only and does not cover all possible hazards.
This document is subject to change. Legislation and Regulations take precedence over any
information found in this document.
1. Is the project for acquisition, new construction or rehabilitation of a one-to-four family residential
property?
D Yes: PROCEED to #3 to determine the likelihood of hazardous conditions existing nearby or on the
property which could affect the health and safety of proposed occupants.
i:g) No: PROCEED to #2
2. Is the project for multifamily housing with 5 or more dwelling units (including leasing), or non-
residential property?
D No: PROCEED to #3
i:g] Yes: The environmental review must include the evaluation of previous uses of the site or other evidence of
contamination on or near the site, to assure that the occupants of proposed sites are not adversely affected by
hazardous materials , contamina tion, toxic chemicals and gases, and radioactive substances. For acquisition
and new construction projects, HUD strongly advises that the review include an ASTM Phase 1
assessment or equivalent analysis, including an update if the assessment is over 180 days old, in order to
meet real estate transaction standards of due diligence. lfyou do obtain a Phase I review, it is suggested that
you include consideration of the regulations at 24 CFR Part 58 .5 (i) as an additional purpose in the subsection on
"purpose" in the Phase l. Your review should cover the information in the questions below (if you have a
Phase I it will already cover the information below). PROCEED to #3. Propo<,a[ rnnsi sts or rehabilitation of
existing dwelling units and modification of public facility site improvements: n o acquis ition is proposed.
3. Is the answer Yes to any of the following questions?
• Is the property or surrounding neighborhood listed on an EPA Superfund National Priorities, the
CERCLA List, or equivalent State list'?
An internet site that may be helpful is www.cpa .gov/superfund1s itesi npl.
i:g) No D Yes
• ls the property located near a toxic or solid-waste landfill site'?
An internet s ite that may be helpful is htt12;//w w,v .cpa.g_ov /cmcfdata/em4ef.l\ome. Maps, site
inspections and documentation from the local planning department may also be useful in making your
determination.
0No i:g) Yes
• Are there any underground storage tanks (not including residential fuel tanks) on or near the
property'?
For projects in Washington Slate, visit: :-:t~~~_,~t;~_,g9_'{{.Q.r:.ogr_ams/tcp./t1~t:lt1s l/Ja11k_~J1Jo .. 1l .
for projects in Oregon, visit: http ://www.dcq .stalc.o r.usr'lg i tanks/indc~.htm
I of2 HUD Seattle Region Environmental Office -2015
For projects in Idaho, yisit_h_ttps :!/www .degj5-iaho .gov/waste-_i:ngmv~mediatio n:storagc-tanks/leaking-
tJ1.J._Q.Crn:round-storairc-s .as p x
For projects in Alaska, visit: http://1,,v1,,vw.de c .statc.ak.us/spar/i pp/tanks .h tm
Consider past uses of the property when making your determination.
D No [;gj Yes
• Is the property known or suspected to be contaminated by toxic chemicals or radioactive
materials?
[;gj No 0Yes
HUD 's "Choosing an Environmentally 'Safe' Site" provides guidance in considering potential environmental
issues: https : //www.onecpd.i nfo/resource/8 3 /c hoos inq-a n-envi r an m entally-safe -s ite/ In
considering the site the guidance suggests that you:
• Make a visual inspection of the site for signs of distressed vegetation, vents or fill pipes, storage/oil
tanks or questionable containers, pits, ponds or lagoons, stained soil or pavement , pungent, foul or
noxious odors , dumped material or soil, mounds of dirt, rubble, fill etc.
• Research the past uses of the site and obtain a disclosure of past uses from the owner. Certain past
and prese nt uses such as the following signal concerns of possible contamination and require a more
detailed review: gasoline stations, vehicle repair shops, car dealerships, garages, depots, warehouses,
commercial printing facilities, industrial or commercial warehouses, dry cleaners, photo developing
laboratories, hospitals, junkyard or landfills, waste treatment, storage disposal, processing or
recycling facilities , agricultural/farming operations (including hog and poultry operations) and
tanneries.
• Identify adjoining properties in the surrounding area for evidence of any facilities as described above.
• Research Federal, State and local records about possible toxins and hazards at the site.
[;gj Yes to any of the above questions: PROCEED to #4 S ee Appendix.
D No to all questions: The toxic chemicals and radioactive materials review is complete, unle ss there are other
hazards that could affect the health and safety of occupants. Record your determination on the Statutory
Worksheet and maintain appropriate documentation in the ERR.
4. Could nearby toxic, hazardous or radioactive substances affect the health and safety of project
occupan!s or conflict with the intended utilization of the pr_?~ty? ,. "'-"-·····-.. _
Gather all pertinent information concerning any on-site and nearby toxic hazards. Consider, at a minimum, each
of the areas identified in Question 3. Consider if your ASTM Phase I or equivalent analysis identifies any
Recogniz ed Env ironmental Conditions (RECs) or conditions that could impact the health or safety of the
occupa nts. If appropriate and/or required, obtain independent professional reviews of the site ( e.g., an ASTM
Phase 2 or equivalent analysis). Contact appropriate Federal, State and Local resources for assistance in assessing
exposure to health hazards .
D Yes: PROCEED to #5.
~ No: The toxic chemicals and radioactive materials review is complete , unless there are other hazards that
could affect the health and safety of occupants. Record your determination that there are no hazards that
could affect the safety of occupants or impact the intended use of the project and maintain appropriate
documentation in the ERR. Sec attachment.
5. Can the adverse environmental condition be mitigated?
D Yes: Mitigate according to the requirements of the appropriate Federal, State or local oversight agency.
Record your determination that there are no hazards that could affect the safety of occupants or impact the
intended use of the project and maintain appropriate documentation in the ERR. HUD assistance s hould be
conditioned on completion of appropriate mitigation. Deny HUD assistance if, after mitigation, the property
is still determined to be unsafe or unhealthy. For more details please refer to I IUD's "Choosing an
Environmentally 'Safe' Site."
D No: Do not provide HUD assistance for the project at this site.
2 of2 HUD Seattle Region Environmental O fficc -2015
DISCLAIMER: This document is intended as a tool to help Region X HUD
grantees and HUD staff complete environmental requirements. This
document is subject to change. This is not a policy statement. Legislation
and Regulations take precedence over any information found in this
document.
3 of2 11 U D Seattle Region Environmental Office -20 15
Worksheet Appe1 x: Review Summary, La au Associates
July 6, 2016
Amy Maule, Senior Staff Scientist, Landau Associates
Hillcrest
No recognized environmental conditions or potential environmental concerns were identified for the
Hillcrest property. Drycleaners, automotive service stations and gasoline stations have historically
operated within V,i mile of the subject property, but these sites are likely hydraulically downgradient
and not immediately adjacent to Hillcrest, so pose a low risk of envirorunental contamination.
Evergreen Terrace
No recognized environmental conditions or potential envirorunental concerns were identified for the
Evergreen Terrace property. Drycleaners, automotive service stations and gasoline stations have
historically operated within V,i mile of the subject property, but these sites are likely hydraulically
dmvngradient and not immediately adjacent to Evergreen Terrace, so pose a low risk of envirorunental
contamination.
Cole Manor
No recognized environmental conditions were identified for the Cole Manor property; however, two
potential envirorunental concerns were identified:
• ARCO AM-PM, 2900 NE Third St. Approximately 120 ft east/potentially hydraulically upgradient. No
releases have been reported at this property; however, the presence of a gasoline station hydraulically
upgradient of the subject property is considered a potential environmental concern.
• Renton Highlands Landfill, NE 3 rd St. & NE 4 t h St. Approximately 500 ft east/potentially hydraulically
upgradient. This site is awaiting cleanup of suspected conventional organic and inorganic
contamination of soil. Soil contamination generally presents a low risk to nearby sites; however, given
the regulatory status and location hydraulically upgradient of the subject property, this site is
considered a potential environmental concern.
Recommendations
This review found no evidence of known or suspected contamination at any of the three properties.
Therefore, no additional investigation is warranted based on the project as defined, and the information
reviewed. Howe ver, if evidence of potential contamination is identified during project planning or
execution, procedures should be implemented for sampling and analysis to evaluate the suspect
material and provide for appropriate handling and disposal of the material to ensure protection of
human health and the environment.
4 of2 I IUD Seattle Re gio n Environmental Office 2015
Wild and Scenic Rivers
Checklist for HUD or Responsible Entity
General requirements Legislation
Estab li shes a method for providing The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act
Federal protection for certain free-(Pub L. 90-542 as amended: 16
flowing and scenic rivers designated as u.s.c. 1271-1287)
components or potential components of
the National Wild a nd Scenic Rivers
System from the effects of construction.
1. Is your project within oroximitv of a Wild and Scenic River?
Regulation
24 CFR 58.5(£)
24 CFR 50.4(f)
You must consider Designated Wild and Scenic Rivers (http://www.rivers .gov/map.php ); Study Wild and
Scenic Rivers (http://www.rivers.gov/study.php) and rivers on the Nationwide Rivers Inventory
(http://www .nps.gov/ncrc /programs/rtca/nri/)
[:2JNo: STOP here. Project is in compliance with this section. Attach documentation used to make your
detennination, such as a map identifying the project si te and its surrounding area or a list of rivers in your
region.
0Yes: the project is in proximity of a Designation Wild and Scenic River or Study Wild and Scenic River.
PROCEED to #2
0Yes: the project is in proximity of Nationwide Rivers Inventory (NRI) river. PROCEED to #3
2. ls your project a Water Resources project?
A Water Resources Project is a federally assisted project that could affect the free-flowing condition of a
Wild and Scenic River. Example s include dams, water diversion projects, bridges, roadway construction,
boat ramps, and activities that require a Section 404 pennit from the Army Corps of Engineers. New
construction that could increase storm \Nater runoff should also be considered.
0 No: STOP here. Project is in compliance with this sec tion. Please attach all necessary supporting
documentation.
0 Yes: PROCEED to #3.
3. Cou1d the project do any of the following:
• Have a direct and adverse effect within Wild and Scenic River Boundaries
• Invade the area or unreasonably diminish the river outside the \\lild and Scenic River
Boundaries'?
• Have an adverse effect on the natural, cultural, and/or recreational values of a NRI segment?
For designated and study wild and scen ic rivers, consult with the appropriate federal/s tate/local/tribal
Managing Agency, pursuant to Section 7 of the Act, to dctennine if the proposed project may have an
adverse effect. For NRI rivers, consult with the National Park Service pursuant lo Section 5 of the Act to
determine if your project w ill have an adverse effect.
0 No: STOP here. Project is in compliance with this section. Please attach all necessary supporti n g
documentation.
D Y cs: PROCEED to #4
HUD Region X Environmental Office June 2012
4. Can you mitigate the imp ___ to the river?
0 Yes. Attach mitigation plan. Require mitigation as part of grant agreement and other contracts. Monitor
project to ensure mitigation followed-through.
D No. Cancel proj ect at this location.
DISCLAIMER: This document is intended as a tool to help HUD Region X
grantees and HUD staff complete environmental requirements. This
document is subject to change. This is not a policy statement, and the Wild
and Scenic Rivers leg islation and regulations take precedence over any
information found in this document.
I IUD Region X Environmenta l Office -June 2012
Attachment D Cultural Resources
d
August 4, 2016
Ms. Margaret Berger
Archaeologist
Cultural Resource Consultants, Inc.
197 Parfitt Way SW, Suite 100
P.O. Box 10668
Bainbridge Island, WA 98110
In future correspondence please refer to:
Project Tracking Code: 2016-07-05037
Property: Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capital Facility Program
Re: No Historic Properties Affected
Dear Ms. Berger:
Allys on Brook s Ph.D .. Di re ctor
St a te His toric Pr e serv a ti o n O ffic er
Thank you for contacting the Washington State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and
Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) on behalf of the Renton Housing
Authority regarding the above referenced proposal. Your communication on this action has been
reviewed by Dr. Rob Whitlam and myself on behalf of the SHPO under provisions of Section
106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (as amended) and 36 CFR Part 800. Our
review is based upon documentation provided in your submittal.
First, we agree with the project area of potential effect {APE) as mapped in your documentation.
We also concur that no historic properties will be affected by the current project as proposed.
As a result of our concurrence, further contact with DAHP on this proposal is not necessary.
However, if new information about affected resources becomes available and/or the project
scope of work changes significantly, please resume consultation as our assessment may be
revised. Also, if any archaeological resources are uncovered during construction, please halt
work immediately in the area of discovery and contact the appropriate Native American Tribes
and OAHP for further consultation.
Thank you for the opportunity to rev iew and comment. Should you have any questions, please
feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Russell Holter
Project Compliance Reviewer
(360) 586-3533
russell.holter@dahp .wa .gov
Sta te of Washingt o n • Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation
P.O. Box 48343 • O lympia. Washington 9850 4-8343 • (360) 586 -306 5
www .dah p .wa.gov
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
---
Cultural Resource Consultants
August 4, 2016
Lisa Grueter
Berk Consulting
TECHNICAL ME i\'10 1605M-2
Margaret Berger, Principal Investigator/Project Archaeologist
Cultural Resources Assessment for the Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capital
Facility Program, Renton , King County, WA
The attached short report form constitutes our final report for the above referenced project. No
further archaeolog ical evaluation is recommended. One previously unrecorded hi storic site was
identified a nd recorded but is recommended not eligible for the NRHP. No further historical
evaluation is recommended. Please contact our office should you have any questions about our
finding s and/or recommendations.
8 1\l.l.1\RD LABS
1416 NW 46TH ST .. STE I 05 PM I:! ,4f,
S1:.-\111.t , WA 98107
PHONI: 206 855 -9020 i nfo@crcwa.mm
CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT COVER SHEET.
Author: Margaret Berger
Title of Report: Cultural Resources Assessment for the Renton Housing Authority
2016 Capital Facility Program l Renton, King County,_W_~
Date of Report: August 4, 2016
County(ies): King Section(s): 4 & 16 Township: 23 N Range:05 E
Quad: Bellevue South, W..A and Renton, WA Acres:< 1
PDF of report subf'Ditted (REQUIRED) [8J Yes
Historic Property Inventory Forms to be Approved Online? D Yes [8J No
Archaeological Site(s)/lsolate(s) Found or Amended? D Yes [8J No
TCP(s) found? D Ye? [8J No
Replace a draft? D Yes [8J No
Satisfy a DAHP Archaeological Excavation Permit requirement? D Yes #.~~"-[8J..lL...:...CN=o
Were Human Remains Found? D Yes DAHP Case# . -[8JNo
DAHP Archaeological Site #:
• Submission of PDFs is required .
• Please be sure that any PDF submitted to
DAHP has its cover sheet, figures,
graph ics, appendices, attachments,
correspondence, etc., compiled into one
single PDF file.
• Please check that the PDF displays
correctly when opened.
Management Summary
This report describes a cultural resources assessment for the Renton Housing Authority 2016
Capital Facility Program, in Renton, King County, Washington. The project involves proposed
interior and exterior improvements at Renton Housing Authority public housing facilities. This
assessment was developed to identify any previously recorded archaeological or historic sites in
the project location and evaluate the potential for the project to affect historic properties. Cultural
Resource Consultants , LLC (CRC) has conducted background research to identify any recorded
archaeological or historic sites within the project and to assess the potential for as-yet unrecorded
historic properties to be present. The project is considered to have a very low potential to affect
archaeological sites. One property over 45 years in age (Evergreen Terrace) was identified; a
historic property inventory form (HPI) was completed and reviewed by the Washington
Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP). The property is not considered
eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). No further work is recommended.
1. Administrative Data
Report Title: Cultural Resources Assessment for the Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capital
Facility Program , Renton, King County, WA
Author (s): Margaret Berger
Report Date: August 4 , 2016
Project Background: Berk Consulting requested a cultural resources assessment on behalf of
Renton Housing Authority. Renton Housing Authority is planning for capital projects at Cole
Manor (built 1981 ), Evergreen Terrace (built 1968), Hillcrest Terrace (built 1962-63), and the
Sunset Terrace redevelopment site that will receive federal funding from the Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This federal undertaking must comply with the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Section l 06 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (NHPA). It is CRC's understanding that specific locations of site improvements,
sidewalk, and fencing at Cole Manor, Evergreen Terrace, and Hillcrest Terrace are yet to be
determined.
At Hillcrest Terrace, proposed work includes:
Site improvement:
• 2016: Garbage recycling station: The station has been constructed as of March 2016 in
correlation with preceding budget requests. As it was not part of its own environmental
clearance, it is addressed in this assessment.
• 2017 ~ 2020: Americans with Disability Act (ADA) access upgrades. These may include:
Possible replacement of current failing sidewalks, extra ADA curb cuts, and possible
ADA mail box areas. Depending on the length and amount of ground disturbance, the
activity may be considered categorically excluded or subject to an environmental
assessment. In any case, it is programmatically addressed in this assessment.
CRC Techn ical Memorandum #1605M-2
Cultural Resources Assessment, Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capita l Facility Program. Renton, King County, WA
Page 1
Dwelling Structures:
• 2016: Shop building modernization. Utilize old l aundry/office/foyer area for maintenance
storage and work space. Some of the work may be considered rehabilitation and
categorically excluded; however, it is encompassed in the current assessment.
• 2016-2017: Interior repairs including paint, flooring, cabinets, fixtures. Paint type is
anticipated to be latex base paint. The work includes a mix of maintenance and
rehabilitation, which are exempt or categorically excluded, respectively. Asbestos
abatement of flooring and base adhesives by contractors at the time of vacant unit
renovation work.
Dwelling Equipment:
• 2016-2020: Replace appliances and hot water heaters. These are considered exempt
maintenance.
At Evergreen Terrace, proposed work includes:
Site improvement:
• 2017 -2020: ADA access upgrades. Possible replacement of current failing sidewalks,
extra ADA curb cuts, and possible ADA mail box areas as well as improvements in the
common laundry room area. Depending on the length and amount of ground disturbance,
the activity may be considered categorically excluded or subject to an environmental
assessment. In any case, it is programmatically addressed in the environmental
assessment.
Dwelling Structures:
• 2016-201 7: Interior repairs including paint, flooring, cabinets, and fixtures. The work
includes a mix of maintenance and rehabi l itation, which are exempt or categorically
excluded, respectively. Asbestos abatement of flooring and base adhesives by contractors
at the time of vacant unit renovation work.
Dwelling Equipment:
• 2016-2020: Replace appliances and hot water heaters. These are considered exempt
maintenance.
At Cole Manor, proposed work includes:
Site improvement:
• 2016: Perimeter fence replacement and sidewalk work. Perimeter fence replacement may
e xceed one cubic foot soil disturbance as new post holes may be required to be dug for
fence post placement. Sidewalk work includes replacing current damaged sidewalks with
new.
• 2017 -2020: ADA access upgrades include ADA curb cuts, dumpster locations, and
common laundry room area. Depending on the length and amount of ground disturbance,
the activity may be considered categorically excluded or subject to an environmental
assessment. In any case, it is programmatically addressed in the environmental
assessment.
Dwelling Structures:
• 2016: Replace exterior s iding with new siding material (Hardy-Plank type siding); old
material to be removed by contractor for disposal. Activities are r ehabilitation in nature,
and categorically excluded , but addressed in the environmental assessment.
CRC Techn ical Memorandum #1605M-2
Cu ltu ral Resources Assessment, Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capital Facility Program, Renton , King County, WA
Page 2
• 2016-2017: Interior repairs: paint, flooring, cabinets, fixtures. Paint is anticipated to be
latex based paint. Cabinet replacement would occur as needed; floors to be replaced. No
asbestos containing materials have been identified. Activities are a mix of maintenance
and rehabilitation, which are exempt or categorically excluded, respectively; however,
the activities are programmatically addressed in the environmental assessment.
Dwelling Equipment:
• 2016-2020: Replace appliances and hot water heaters. These are considered exempt
maintenance but are programmatically addressed in the environmental assessment.
The 2016 Capital Facility Program also includes development planning and design of
replacement units at Sunset Terrace, but effects to cultural resources were evaluated in the
following NEPA studies:
• CH2MHill and ICF International. 2011. Sunset Area Community Planned Action
NEPNSEPA Environmental Impact Statement. Final. April. (ICF 00593.10.) Bellevue
and Seattle, WA. Prepared for City of Renton and the Renton Housing Authority, Renton,
WA.
• Reevaluation / Addendum, Renton Sunset Terrace Redevelopment 2014, Prepared By:
BERK Consulting in association with CH2MHill, Mithun, and Weinman Consulting LLC
• Reevaluation / Addendum Renton Sunset Terrace Redevelopment 2016, Prepared By:
BERK Consulting in association with CH2MHill, CRC, Mithun, Perteet, and Weinman
Consulting LLC
Additional assessment at Sunset Terrace is not needed at this time to meet compliance with
Section 106 and NEPA. As a result, Sunset Terrace is not included in the analysis presented in
this report.
It is CRC's understanding that Hillcrest Terrace was previously evaluated for historical
significance and determined not eligible for the NRHP. No further historical built environment
investigations are needed for Hillcrest, nor are historical built environment investigations needed
at Cole Manor due to its age. DAHP requested information about Evergreen Terrace to
determine whether further historical evaluation and assessment of potential effects to historic
properties at Evergreen Terrace would be needed.
location: This assessment addresses proposed work at three Renton Housing Authority
Subsidized and Senior Housing properties in the City of Renton , Washington 98056 (Figures 1 -
4). The physical addresses are as follows:
• Cole Manor, 2811 NE 4th Street;
• Evergreen Terrace, 3027 NE 15th Street; and
• Hillcrest T e rrace, 1442 Hillcrest Lane NE.
Cole Manor is located in the NWl/i of the NWl/i of Section 16 , and Hillcrest Terrace and
Evergreen Terrace are in the E l/2 of the SW 1/4 of Section 4 , T. 23 N., R. 5 E., W.M.
USGS 7.5' Topographic MapJ_s): Bellevue South , WA (1983) and Renton, WA (1994) (see
Figure 1 ).
Total Area Involved: Total acreage of the properties is 9.66 acres, but a much smaller area(< 1
a cre) is involved in potential ground disturbance.
CRC Technical Memorandum #1605M-2
Cu ltural Resources Assessment, Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capital Fac ility Program , Renton , King County, WA
Page 3
Re_corded Cultural Resources Present: Yes [x] No []
The Hillcrest Terrace Public Housing Complex was recorded as a historic site, evaluated for
significance, and was determined not eligible for the NRHP in 2011 (Hetzel 201 O; reference
#09 l O I 0 -31-HUD-CDBG). No other recorded archaeological or historic sites are within the
project.
Ob~tive (Research Design): This assessment was developed as a component of
preconstruction environmental review with the goal of ensuring that no cultural resources are
disturbed by the proposed project. CRC's work was intended, in part, to assist in addressing
agency responsibilities regarding the identification of potential effects to historic properties in
accordance with NEPA, Section 106 of the NHPA of 1966 , as amended, and implementing
regulations (36CFR800), and state laws and regulations protecting cultural resources (e.g., RCW
27.44, RCW 27.53). The Archaeological Sites and Resources Act (RCW 27.53) prohibits
knowingly disturbing archaeological s ites without a permit from DAHP, and the Indian Graves
and Records Act (RCW 27.44) prohibits knowingly disturbing Native American or historic
graves. Under NEPA, agencies must consider the environmental consequences of a proposal,
including impacts to cultural resources, before taking action. Under Section 106, agencies
involved in a federal undertaking must take into account the undertaking's potential effects to
historic properties (36 CFR 800.16(1)(1) ).
Assessment methods consisted of review of available project information provided by Berk
Consulting, local environmental, cultural, and historical information, and records on file at
DAHP. CRC also contacted the cultural resources department at the Duwamish, Muckleshoot,
and Snoqualmie trib es to inquire about project-related cultural information or concerns
(Attachment A). At the time this assessment was completed, no response had been received. If
new information is provided, it would be incorporated into a revision of this document. This
assessment utilized a research design that considered previous studies, the magnitude and nature
of the undertaking, the nature and extent of potential effects on historic properties, and the likely
nature and location of historic properties within the area of potential effects (APE), as well as
other applicable laws, standards, and guidelines (per 36CFR800.4 (b)(l)) (DAHP 2015).
2. Background Research
Background research was conducted in July 2016.
Archival Sources Checky_g:
DAHP WISAARD
Web Soil Survey
Library
[x] Recorded archaeological sites arc located well outside the
project. Hillcrest Public Housing Complex was previously
recorded and determined not eligible for the NRHP.
[x] The soil units mapped in the project location are Arents,
Everett material; Arents, Alderwood material, 6 to 15 percent
slopes; and Indianola loamy sand. 5 to 15 percent slopes (USDA
NRCS 2016).
[x] Various historical, archaeological , and ethnographic
references in the Seattle Public Library and in CRC's library.
CRC Technical Memorandum #1605M-2
Cultural Resources Assessment, Renton Hous ing Authority 2016 Capital Facil ity Program, Renton , King County, WA
Page 4
Context Overview: Environmental and cultural context information for this project is
derived from relevant published reports, articles, and books ( e.g., Marino 1990; Nelson 1990;
Suttles and Lane 1990); historical maps and documents (e.g., USSG 1865); geological and soils
surveys (e.g., USDA NRCS 2016; WA DNR 2016); ethnographic accounts (e.g., Waterman ca.
1920, 1922 , 2001 ); and archaeological reports ( e.g., Elder et al. 2010; Stevenson et al. 2011) in
the local area. The following discussion of project area geology, archaeology, history, and
ethnography incorporates context information from CRC's prior work in the Renton area by
reference (e.g., Berger 2007, 2009; Schumacher 2015).
Environment~! Context: The project is geographically situated within the Willamette-Puget
Lowland physiographic province. This province is characteri zed by the wide "trough" between
the Coast and Cascade Ranges formed during the advance and retreat of Pleistocene epoch
glaciers (McKee 1972:290). The project is in the Tsuga hete rophylla vegetation zone (Franklin
and Dymes s 1973) in the Lake Washington/Cedar River Watershed. The project is situated on a
terrace above the southeast side of Lake Washington and north of the Cedar River; this area of
Renton is known as Highlands. Elevation ranges from approximately 320 feet above sea level at
Cole Manor to 3 80-390 feet at Hillcrest Terrace and Evergreen Terrace.
T he contemporary topography and surface geology of the project area were shaped by multiple
glaciations that occurred during the end of the Pleistocene (Kruckeberg 1991: 12). The most
recent glacial e vent in the Puget Sound, called the Vashon Stade, is largely responsible for the
region's contemporary lands cape; glacial advance and retreat scoured and compacted underlying
geology while meltwaters carved drainage channels into glacial outwash deposits (Downing
1983; Booth et al. 2003). By about 13,600 years ago, the last of the Pleistocene glaciers had
retreated a s far north as Seattle (Thorson 1980), exposing the predominately north-trending
ridges and relatively level uplands characteristic of the Puget Sound region.
Local geological and soil maps indicate that sediments in the project area are derived from late
Pleistocene glacial activity. According to the Washington Interactive Geologic Map (WA DNR
2016), the surface geologic units mapped in the project are Fraser-age continental glacial
outwash (Qgo) and Fraser-age continental glacial till (Qgt), both dating to the late Pleistocene.
The soil units mapped in the project location are Arents , Everett material; Arents, Alderwood
material , 6 to 15 percent slopes ; and Indianola loamy sand , 5 to 15 percent slopes (uSDA NRCS
2016). The A rents s oils formed on till plains in basal till parent material. The typical profile for
Arents, Everett material is gravelly sandy loam from O to 8 inches and very coarse gravelly sand
from 8 to 60 inches. The typical profile for Arents, Alderwood material is gravelly s andy loam
from O to 26 inches and very gravelly sandy loam from 26 to 60 inches . Th e Indianola soil
formed on terraces, eskers, and kame ri sers in sandy glacial outwash. The typical profile is
slightly decomposed plant material over loamy sand from 1 to 17 inches below surface, followed
by sandy horizons to a depth of 60 inches (USDA NRCS 2016). The locally mapped soils and
geology indicate that deposition in the Holocene has been minimal and any archaeological
material would have been relatively near the present-day ground surface. Archaeological sites
may occur on the surface of outwash or till deposits, but would not be deeply buried.
CRC T echnical Memorandum #1605M-2
Cu ltural Resources Assessment. Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capital Facility Program , Renton . K ing Cou nty, WA
Page 5
Archaeological Cov!ext: Regional and local studies have provided an archaeological and
historical synthesis of approximately the last 10,000 years of human occupation in the Puget
Sound region (Nelson 1990). Human use of the area is generally structured around the value of
natural resources available in local environments including fresh water, terrestrial and marine
food resources, forests, and suitable terrain. The archaeological context for evaluating the project
area is provided by the regional chronological sequence and research domains as included in
Morgan et al. ( 1999), Suttles and Lane (1990), Wessen and Stilson ( 1987), and others.
The landscape of the project area would have been available for occupation once the Puget Lobe
and meltwaters receded, over 10 ,000 years ago , and archaeological evidence from the region
supports this (Carlson 1990). Archaeological sites from the Paleoindian period are scarce in the
Puget Lowland and Cascade foothills. Recently, a Paleoindian component was identified in
stratified sediments at a site on Bear Creek, a tributary of the Sammamish River (Kopper! et al.
2010), approximately 12 miles northeast of the project.
Archeologists have identified broad similarities among sites and lithic assemblages that date to
between 9000 and 5000 B.P. Many of these early archaeological sites comprise the Olcott Phase
in Western Washington and are contemporaneous with similar Cascade Phase sites identified
east of Cascade Mountains. The Olcott Phase is characterized by occupation sites located on
uplands or atop upper river terraces, lithic workshops, and temporary hunting camps that contain
a wide variety of flaked stone tools and laurel-leaf-shaped bifaces suggestive of large game
hunting, butchering and processing (Morgan et al. 1999). Several Olcott sites have been
documented and studied throughout Western Washington and the Olympic Peninsula (e .g.,
Dancey 1968; Kidd 1964; Morgan et al. 1999; Samuels 1993).
Generally, changes in subsistence economy and occupation patterns arc reflected in
archaeological assemblages that date between 5000 and 3000 B.P. During this time, an
increasing number of tools were manufactured by grinding stone, and more antler and bone were
utilized for tools. This period is also indicated by the occurrence of smaller triangular projectile
points. Living floors, evidence of structural supports and hearths are more common during this
period in contrast to the Olcott Phase. In the Puget Lowland, evidence of task-specific, year-
round activities that include salmon and clam processing, woodworking, basket and tool
manufacture, date from approximately 4200 B.P. (Larson and Lewarch 1995).
Characteristic of the ethnographic pattern in the region, seasonal residence and logistical
mobility occurred from about 3000 B.P. Organic materials, including basketry, wood and food
stuffs, are more likely to be preserved in sites of this late precontact period, both in submerged,
anaerobic sites and in sca led storage pits. Sites dating from this period represent specialized
seasonal spring and summer fishing and root-gathering campsites and winter village locations.
These kinds of sites have been identified in the Puget Lowland, typically loc ated adjacent to
rivers or marine transportation routes. Fish weirs and other permanent constmctions arc often
associated with large occupation sites. Common artifact assemblages consist of a range of
hunting, fishing and food processing tools, bone and shell implements and midden deposits.
Similar economic and occupational trends persisted throughout the Puget Sound region until the
arrival of European explorers .
CRC Technical Memorandum #1605M-2
Cultural Resources Assessment, Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capital Facility Program, Renton , King County, WA
Page 6
Ethnographic Context: The project area is located in the traditional territory of the
Duwamish Tribe , a Salish-speaking people who lived in the general vicinity of Seattle (Castile
1985; Spier 1936; Smith 1940). Pre-contact Duwamish settlements were often located along
major waterways and at heads of bays or inlets, where abundant resources of coastal and
estuarine environments supported a relatively rich, diverse, and reliable subsistence base. During
the winter months, the Duwamish lived in large villages at permanent settlements, while the
summers were spent fishing, hunting and gathering at temporary camps. Prior to local Euro-
American settlement, Duwamish villages were reported along Elliot Bay, Lake Washington,
Lake Union, and Salmon Bay, and the Duwamish, Black, Green (now called White), and Cedar
Rivers and their tributaries (Ruby and Brown 1992:72; Spier 1936:34; Suttles and Lane
1990:486; Waterman ca. 1920). The Muckleshoot Indian Tribe exercises Duwamish fishing
rights on Lake Washington, as recognized as successors to the Duwamish. The Duwamish tribal
organization does not currently have federal recognition.
Ethnographers (Smith 1940, 1941; Spier 1936; Waterman ca. 1920, 2001) gathered locations of
villages and names for resource areas, water bodies, and other landscape features from native
informants. Numerous ethnographic sites are recorded in the Renton area. These are primarily
around the southern s horeline of Lake Washington, and along the Duwamish, Cedar, Green, and
former Black River channels (Smith 1941; Waterman ca. 1920, 2001). To the west of the project
near the south end of Lake Washington, there was a village where the Cedar River flowed into
the former Black River called TuxE 'b-qo, "confluence" (Waterman 200 l: 149). Smith ( 1940: 16)
also refers to a place name that may be in the same location , katilbabc, "where the Cedar River
joined the outlet from Lake Washington, present town of Renton." Waterman (2001:149)
recorded SkEte 'lube as "the present habitation of Mrs. Jimmy Moses, an Indian informant, in the
town of Renton." This place is mapped on the east side of the former Black River (Waterman
2001: 148). The head of the former Black River at the south end of Lake Washington was called
Ciq 'ed, translated as "head" or "source" (Waterman 1922: 191).
One name is recorded as in the vicinity of the Highlands area (Waterman's map is not exacting):
Tuqwi 'tlus, which is translated as" 'red face,' for a high bluff east of Renton" (Waterman
2001: 148-149). No specific ethnographic references to the project location were found. The
sources reviewed did not disclose any recorded traditional cultural properties (TCPs) in the
project area.
Historic Context: Euro-American settlement began in the Renton area around 1850 (Bagley
1929:27). An increased number of settlers began to populate the region in search of homesteads
and employment. This was due in part to the enactment of Oregon Donation Land Act in 1850 ,
which drew settlers to the area by offering free 320-acre parcels to those who would reside on
and cultivate the land for four consecut1ve years. By the mid-1850s, increased Euro-American
settlement had drastically impacted Indian people and the1r traditions through disease, violence,
and the disruption of settlements and subsistence economies. In 1855 , the Duwamish and other
Puget Sound tribes signed the Point Elliot Treaty, which forced local tribes onto reservations.
The Duwamish were not assigned their own reservation, but rather were required to live on either
the Port Madison Indian Reservation on the Kitsap Peninsula or the Muckleshoot Indian
Reservation between Auburn and Enumclaw. This time period was marked by heightened
tension and violence between tribes and white settlers throughout Puget Sound.
CRC Technical Memorandum #1605M-2
Cultural Resources Assessment, Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capital Facility Program , Renton , K ing County, WA
Page 7
Early Euro-American settlement activity focused on easily accessed areas such as shorelines and
river valleys. The Renton area, particularly the Black River and its confluence with the Cedar
River, had attracted homesteaders by the early 1850s. According to an online search of federal
land records, patents for lands containing the project were not issued until the late 1880s to early
1890s (BLM 2016) (Table 1).
Coal deposits in the Renton area attracted numerous prospectors to the local area. Dr. R. M.
Bigelow identified coal along the Duwamish River in 1853 and began to actively pursue mining
in the area (Kirk and Alexander 1990:281 ). By the 1870s, Renton coal had sparked the interest of
investors and entrepreneurs who were able to improve industry productivity and profits by
expanding mine tunnels, bunkers and building company housing (Kirk and Alexander 1990:281,
348). Among those who invested in early industry in the area was William Renton of the Port
Blakely Mill Company, who learned of coal deposits in the vicinity of the project and was a
cofounder of the Renton Coal Company (Phillips 1971: 117), incorporated in 1874 (Buerge
1989:26). To help meet increased demand for coal, the Seattle & Walla Walla Railroad was built
connecting Renton to Elliot Bay beginning in 1874 (Robertson 1995 :265). Lines were later
extended from Renton to other coal mining centers at Newcastle and Black Diamond.
The logging industry also figured prominently in early economic activity in the greater Renton
area, as it did in most of western Washington. One of the first businesses in the vicinity of
downtown Renton was a sawmill operated by Henry Tobin on the Black River from l 854 until
his death in 1856 (Slauson 1976:2). William Renton, for whom the City of Renton is named,
became interested in the area for its timber and started logging the south end of Lake Washington
in the 1870s (Slauson 1976:6). After lands were logged, they were often sold off to private
individuals and cleared for agricultural uses.
As previously summarized by Schumacher (2015:6), the Renton coal mines began to close by the
1890s; however, the city's location on a transportation corridor continued to stimulate industrial,
commercial, and residential development (Kirk and Alexander 1990). Sunset Highway was built
through the Highlands area by 1910, and until 1940 was the main road between Seattle and
Snoqualmie Pass (Buerge 1989). In 1940, establishment of the Boeing Company aircraft
manufacturing plant brought greater industrial prosperity. By 1942 and the entry of the United
States into the Second World War, Boeing employed over 40,000 people.
In contrast to the concentration of mid to late nineteenth century developments in the Cedar and
Black River valleys, Euro-American use of the project vicinity remained sparse and rural until
the early 1940s, when demand for worker housing skyrocketed. Many Renton neighborhoods
were established during the war years. Following the end of the war, the federal government
aided Renton's construction of housing projects and residential infrastructure, which included the
Highlands north and south of Sunset Highway (Buerge 1989).
Historical Maps: The General Land Office (GLO) surveyed the township surrounding the
project in the late 1850s, at which time the landscape was undeveloped and sparsely populated.
Trails passing through Renton are recorded on early maps (United States Surveyor General
fUSSG] 1865) (Figure 5). These trails provided access to Elliott Bay and to eastern Washington
CRC Technical Memorandum #1605M -2
Cultural Resources Assessment, Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capital Facility Program , Renton , King County, WA
Page 8
(Lewarch 2006:Figure 3; Prater 1981 :6-13). One trail led from the Black River up the Cedar
River, and there was another trail from the Black River to the Snoqualmie River (USSG 1865).
The Homestead Act of 1862 brought an increase of settlers to the region. No other cultural
features such as homestead improvements or Indian villages are shown in the vicinity of the
project. At the end of the nineteenth century, all portions of the project were mapped as within an
area that had been burnt, but timber stands were restocking (USGS 1897a, 1897b). Some roads
extended to the Highlands area, connecting it to Renton, the Cedar River valley, and the May
Creek valley. The land classi fication and topographic map s from this period do not show any
roads, structures , or other developments in the project location (USGS l 895, 1900).
In the first decade of the twentieth century, more roads were built in the area and the Snoqualmie
Falls Power Company had an electrical transmission line passing near Cole Manor, connecting
the company's Renton substation to its powerhouse at Snoqualmie Falls. The Cole Manor
location is shown as within a tract of School Land in early twentieth century county atlases
(Anderson Map Company 1907; Kroll Map Company 1912). By 1926, the portion of Section 16
containing Cole Manor had been acquired by the heirs ofl. Sartorie (also listed as Jennie Sartorie
et al.) (Kro ll Map Company 1926 ; Metsker l 936). There was a mine or pit in the Cole Manor
location in 1949 (USGS 1949). The Hillcrest and Evergreen Terrace locations arc mapped as
within lands owned by Thomas J. White, Jr. (Anderson Map Company 1907; Kroll Map
Company 1912, 1926; Metsker 1936). The Evergreen Terrace location remained undeveloped in
1950 , while single-family residences had been built along Kirkland Avenue in the Hillcrest
location (USGS 1950).
Historic al air photos of the area are available beginning in 1936. The Cole Manor location was in
an area of shrub forest with a network of logging areas. A road had been established in the
present-day NE 4th Street corridor by this time (King County 2016). Similar vegetation
conditions were in place at Evergreen Terrace and Hillcrest Terrace, and farms had been
established wi thin l ,000 feet to the west, south , and cast (King County 2016). By 1964 , Hillcrest
Terrace had been built but the Evergreen Terrace location remained forested (NETR 2016). The
1968 air photos show Evergreen Terrace construction as complete (NETR 2016).
In 1964, the Cole Manor location contained one building, likely a shop or maintenance building;
the surrounding area is characterized by clearings, vehicle tracks, and blade scars consi s tent with
sand and gravel mining or other mass grading to prepare level development sites (NETR 2016).
In 1968, the location appears to be in a similar industrial use (NETR 2016). These conditions
persi sted in 1980 (NETR 2016), immediately prior to construction of Cole Manor.
DAHP WISAARD: Seventeen cultural resource studies have been carried out within
approximately one mile from the project. These include assessment of proposed transportation
improveme nts to the T-405 corridor (e.g ., Bundy 2008; Smith 2014), proposed cell towers (e.g.,
Stipe 20 07), road widening projects (Chambers 2006 ), and bridge replacement (Baldwin 2016),
as well as data recovery excavations (e.g., Kaehler ct al. 2004).
Cultural re source s assessments have a lso been conducted for other Renton Housing Authority
developments in close proximity to the current project. Two studies addressed potential effects to
cultural resources from the Sunset Terrace redevelopment (Elder et a l. 20 IO; Stevenson et al.
CRC Technical Memorandum #1605M-2
Cultural Resources Assessment, Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capital Facility Program, Renton, King County, WA
Page 9
2011); one study addressed potential effects of construction of a new community building at
Hillcrest Terrace (Hetzel and Elder 201 O); and CRC recently conducted archaeological and
historical investigations at Sunset Court (Schumacher 2015). These studies involved background
research, inventory and evaluation of historic buildings, and archaeological survey including
subsurface testing. None of these studies identified any archaeological sites in proximity to the
current project. These surveys identified subsurface conditions consistent with the non-
depositional geological setting and developed urban character of the area, in which the near-
surface deposits that would have contained archaeological sites have been removed, graded, or
otherwise disturbed, eliminating potential for intact sites (Elder et al. 20 I 0:7.1; Hetzel and Elder
2010:4.1; Schumacher2015:8; Stevenson et al. 2011:7.1).
Nine archaeological sites have been recorded within a distance of approximately two miles from
the project (Table 2). The archaeological site located nearest to the project is site 45KI786,
which consisted of early twentieth century human remains and coffin hardware that was found in
a construction trench about 1/3 of a mile northwest of the project (Rooke 2008). Other sites
within two miles from the project are in the May Creek valley and near the historical confluence
of the Black and Cedar rivers south of Lake Washington. Archaeological sites have not
previously been recorded within or adjacent to the project.
The NRHP, Washington Heritage Register (WHR), and King County Landmarks Register
(KCLR) do not include any properties in proximity to the project. The project is not within or
adjacent to any historic districts. The register-listed historic properties nearest to the project are
nearly one mile away in downtown Renton (Table 3). The project would not affect these historic
properties. Dozens of historic buildings have previously been inventoried within approximately
500 feet from the project. These are predominantly mid-twentieth century residences that were
added to the Historic Property Inventory (HPI) as part of DAHP's 20 l l HPI Upload Project,
which involved the addition of available information from the County Assessors' building
records to WISAARD (Artifacts Consulting 2011 ). None of the uploaded data was field verified
at the time, nor were eligibility assessments conducted. Aside from the previously determined
NRHP-ineligible Hillcrest Terrace Public Housing Complex, all of the previously inventoried
structures are well outside the limits of the project. Given the scope and nature of the project,
effects to aboveground historic properties are not anticipated.
Archaeological Predictive Jytodel: The DAHP statewide predictive model uses environmental
data about the locations of known archaeological sites to identify where previously unknown
archaeological sites arc more likely to be found. The model correlates locations of known
archaeological to environmental data "to determine the probability that, under a particular set of
environmental conditions , another location would be expected to contain an archaeological site"
(Kauhi and Markert 2009:2-3). Environmental data categories included in the model are
elevation, slope, aspect, di stance to water, geology, soils, and landforms. Model rankings for the
project location arc variable. The Hi llcrest site i s ranked mostly as "Survey Contingent on
Project Parameters: Moderately Low Risk," with the eastern part ranked as "Survey
Recommended: Moderate Risk." The Evergreen Terrace site is ranked "Survey Recommended:
Moderate Risk." The Cole Manor site is ranked mostly as "Survey Highly Advised: High Risk"
with the southeastern part ranked "Survey Recommended: Moderate Risk" (DAHP 2016). The
low-ri sk rankings are generally supported by the local historic, ethnographic, and archaeological
CRC Technical Memorandum #1605M-2
Cultural Resources Assessment, Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capital Fac ility Program , Renton, King County, WA
Page 10
records, as well as the historical upland forest setting elevated above river va lleys and minor
drainages (e.g., May Creek) with fresh water sources. The high-risk ranking for Cole Manor
appears to be driven by relative proximity ( distance ca. one mile) to the Cedar River, recorded
archaeological s ites ( distance less than one mile) and a historically mapped trail ( distance less
than Yi mile) (see Figure 5), but this location is also in an upland forest setting elevated above the
nver.
Archaeological Expectations: Based upon the review of environmental and cultural information
about the project location, the Hillcrest Terrace, Evergreen Terrace, and Cole Manor locations
are all considered to have a very low potential to contain potentially significant cultural resources
(i.e. intact archaeological deposits). The project area likely served as a locus of temporary and
transitory activities such as resource procurement activities and as a hunting, foraging, travel, or
for individual religious activities for Puget Sound peoples in the precontact and historic periods.
Potential types of precontact archaeological materials in the project might include lithic scatters,
fire-modified rock, tool s or other isolated materials lost or discarded in the course of these
activities . Historic-period archaeological materials may include objects related to logging,
farming, and domestic activities, although background research suggests that the potential for
historic-period historic properties is low.
3. Results
Cultural Resources Identified: As noted above, the previously recorded and determined
NRHP-ineligible Hillcrest Terrace Housing Complex was identified within the project. The
Evergreen Terrace Housing Complex was recorded on an HPI form (WISAARD Property
#7063 82) that was submitted to DAHP for review on August 2, 2016. This reconnai ssance level
inventory did not identify any evidence that the property meets criteria for historical significance.
DAHP provided a determination that the property is not eligible for the NRHP on August 4 ,
2016. Because Hillcrest and Evergreen Terrace have been determined not eligible for the NRHP,
any alterations would not constitute an effect to historic properties (36 CFR 800.4 (2)( d)( I)).
Project Conclusions, Findings and R ~commendations: The project will not affect any
previously recorded historic properties. None of the proposed activities at Cole Manor,
Evergreen Terrace, or Hillcrest Terrace will affect aboveground historic properties, nor did the
addition of the garbage recycling station at Hillcrest in March 2016. No further hi storical
evaluation is recommended for the project.
Backgro und research did not identify any high-probability locations for archaeological sites at
Cole Manor, Evergreen Terrace, or Hillcrest Terrace. Conditions identified through review of
local geological and soils maps , historical maps, and historical air photos suggest a very lo w
potential for archaeological deposits to be preserved due to the project's geomorphic setting and
impacts of prior disturbances. Since the soils in the project are derived from parent material
deposited and exposed during glacia l activ ity , cultural materials arc not expected to be found
below the s urface of the glacial deposits. Any potential evidence for buried cultural resources in
the project would be expected to be between glacial material , which is shallowly buried, and the
present-day ground surface . Near-surface sediments in the project have previously been
CRC Technical Memorandum #1605M-2
Cul tural Resources Assessment, Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capital Facility Program , Renton, King County. WA
Page 11
disturbed by late nineteenth century logging and construction of the present-day facilities in the
latter half of the twentieth century.
Construction of the existing buildings and grounds would have required mass grading as well as
some filling and excavation. Based upon the coverage of the involved parcels by existing
buildings, parking lots, manicured lawns, and other improvements, past disturbance is expected
to have impacted all native surfaces; any new ground disturbance for the current project is
expected to be within previously disturbed s ediments or culturally sterile glacial deposits. Intact
archaeological deposits, either precontact or historic in age, are highly unlikely to be preserved in
this setting. Pedestrian survey and subsurface testing would be very unlikely to identify
archaeological deposits given the geological setting, history of landscape modification, distance
from known archaeological sites, and the strong probability that the project area was used for
temporary and transitory activities such as hunting, foraging, travel, or for individual religious
activities unlikely to leave a generate significant archaeological sites. CRC therefore
recommends that the project be permitted to proceed without further archaeological oversight.
An inadvertent discovery plan is included as Attachment B. In the event that ground disturbing
or other activities do result in the inadvertent discovery of archaeological deposits, work should
be halted in the immediate area and contact made with DAHP in Olympia. Work should be
halted until such time as further investigation and appropriate consultation is concluded. In the
unlikely event of the inadvertent discovery of human remains, work should be immediately
halted in the area, the discovery covered and secured against further disturbance, and contact
effected with law enforcement personnel.
Attachments:
Figures
Photographs
Other
[x]
[x]
[x] Copies of project related correspondence between CRC and cultural resources
staff at the Duwamish, Muckleshoot, and Snoqualmie tribes.
[ x] Proposed inadvertent discovery plan.
4. Limitations of this Assessment
No cultural resources study can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for
prehistoric sites, historic properties or traditional cultural properties to be associated with a
project. The information presented in this report is based on professional opinions derived from
our analysis and interpretation of available documents, records, literature, and information
identified in this report , and on our field investigation and observations as described herein.
Conclusions and recommendations presented apply to project conditions existing at the time of
our study and those reasonably foreseeable. The data, conclusions, and interpretations in this
report should not be construed as a warranty of subsurface conditions described in this report.
They cannot necessarily apply to site changes of which CRC is not aware and has not had the
opportunity to evaluate.
CRC Techn ical Memorandum #1605M-2
Cultu ral Resources Assessment, Renton Housing Autho rity 2016 Capital Facility Program, Renton , King County, WA
Page 12
5. References
Anderson Map Company
1907 King County Atlas. Anderson Map Company, Seattle.
Artifacts Consulting, Inc.
2011 Assessors Data Project: King County. Prepared for DAHP by Historic Preservation
Northwest, GeoEngineers, Historic Preservation Northwest, and Artifacts Consulting,
Inc. (Project Lead). On file at Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic
Preservation, Olympia.
Ballard, A. C.
1951 Deposition of Oral Examination of Arthur Condict Ballard In Muckleshoot Tribe of
Indians on Relation of Napoleon Ross, Chairman of the General Council, Claimant v
The United States of America, Defendant. 2 volumes. Heard before the Indian Claims
Commission of the United States, 26-28 November, Seattle, Washington. Carolyn T.
Taylor , Court Reporter, Seattle.
Bagley, Clarence B.
1929 History ofKing County. Volume 1. Clarke Publishing Company, Seattle.
Baldwin, G. L., K. Lewis, and 0. Patsch
2016 Cultural Resources Review for NE 3 1st Street Bridge Replace ment Project, Renton.
Drayton Archaeology, Bellingham, Washington. Prepared for Widener & Associates,
Everett, Washington.
Berger, Margaret
2007 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Rainier A ven ue/Hardie A venue Project: Rainier
Avenue Improvements , City of Renton, King County, Washington. WSHS Technical
Report #3 05. Prepared for Widener & Associates.
2009 Cultural Resources Assessment of the Renton Lutheran Compass Center -Regional
Veterans Complex Project, Renton, King County, WA. Cultural Resource Consultants,
Inc., Bainbridge Island, Washington. Prepared for Shelter Resources.
Booth, Derek B., Ralph A. Haugerud, and Kathy Goetz Troost
2003 The Geology of Puget Lowland Rivers. In Restoration of Puget Sound Rivers , C hapter 2,
edited by David R. Montgomery, Susan Bolton, Derek B. Booth, and Les lie Wall, pp.
14-45 . University of Washington Press, Seattle.
Buerge, David M.
19 89 Renton, Where the Water Took Wing: An Illustrated History. Windsor Publications, Inc.,
Chatsworth, California.
CRC Tech ni ca l Memorandum #1605M -2
Cultural Resources Assessment, Renton Housing Authority 20 16 Capital Facil ity Program , Renton , King Cou nty, WA
Page 13
Bundy, B.
2008 Cultural Resources Survey Interstate 405 Corridor Survey: Phase l Interstate 5 to State
Route 169 Improvements Project. Washington State Department of Transportation
Environmental Services Office, Olympia.
Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
2016 Land Patent Search -BLM GLO Records . Electronic resource,
http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/search/default.aspx, accessed July 11 , 2016.
Carlson, Roy L.
1990 Cultural Antecedents. In Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 7: Northwest
Coast, pp. 60 -6 9, edited by Wayne Suttles. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington,
D.C.
Castile, George P.
1985 The Indians of Puget Sound: The Notebooks of Myron Eells. University of Washington
Press, Seattle.
Chambers, J.
2006 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Duvall A venue NE / Coal Creek Parkway SE
Road Widening Project, King County, Washington. Western Shore Heritage Services,
Tnc., Bainbridge Island, Washington. Prepared for BergerABAM Engineers, Inc.,
Federal Way, Washington.
Dancey, William S.
1968 Archaeology of Mossyrock Reservoir, Washington. Unpublished Master's Thesis,
Department of Anthropology, University of Washington, Seattle.
Downing, John
1983 Th e Coast of Puget Sound. University of Washington Press, Seattle.
Elder, J. T., M. Cascella, and C. Hetzel
20 IO Cultural Resources Survey Report -Potential Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea
and NE Sunset Boulevard. ICF International, Seattle. Prepared for City of Renton and
Renton Housing Authority.
Franklin, Jerry F., and C . T. Dymess
1973 Natural Vegetation of Oregon and Washington. USDA Forest Service, Pacific
Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report PNW-8.
G ibbs, George
1967 Indian Tribes of Washington Territory. Ye Galleon Press, Fairfield, Washington
Google Inc.
2016 Google Earth Pro (Version 7 .1.4.1529) [Software J. Available from
http://www.google.com/earth/download/gep/agree.html, accessed July 11, 2016.
CRC Technical Memorandum #1605M-2
Cultural Resources Assessment, Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capital Facility Program, Renton, King County, WA
Page 14
Hetzel, C.
2010 State of Washington Historic Property Inventory Form, Hillcrest Terrace Public Housing
Complex. On file at DAHP, Olympia.
Hetzel , Christopher, and J. Tait Elder
2010 Cultural Resources Survey Report: Hillcrest Terrace Community Building. ICF
International, Seattle. Prepared for City of Renton and Renton Housing Authority.
Kaehler, G. A., S. E. Trudel, D. E. Lewarch and L. L. Larson
2004 Data Recovery Excavations at the Henry Moses Aquatic Center Site (45KI686), Renton,
King County, Washington. Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services, Gig
Harbor, Washington. Prepared for City of Renton.
Kauhi, Tonya C., and Joanne Markert
2009 Washington Statewide Archaeology Predictive Model Report. Prepared for Washington
Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. GeoEngineers, Seattle.
Kidd, R. S.
1964 A Synthesis of Western Washington Prehistory from the Perspective of Three
Occupation Sites. Unpublished Master's thesis. Department of Anthropology, University
of Washington, Seattle.
King County
2016 iMAP -Property Information. El ectronic resource,
http://www5.kingcounty.gov/iMAP/viewer.htm, accessed July I 3, 20 16.
Kopperl, R., C. J. Miss, and C. M. Hodges
2010 Results of Testing at the Bear Creek Site 45KI839, Redmond, King County,
Washington. Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc., Seattle. Prepared for City of
Redmond and David Evans and Associates, Inc.
Kroll Map Company
1912 Kroll'.'}' Atlas of King County, Washington. Kroll Map Company, Seattle.
1926-1927 Kroll 's Atlas of King County, Washington. Kroll Map Company, Seattle.
Kruckeberg, Arthur R.
1991 The Natural History of Puget Sound County. University of Washington Press. Seattle.
Larson, Lynn L., and Dennis E. Lewarch (editors)
1995 The Archaeology of West Point, Seattle, Washington: 4,000 Years of llunter-Fisher-
Gatherer Land Use in Southern Puget Sound. Larson Anthropological Archaeological
Services, Gig Harbor, Washington.
CRC Techni ca l Memorandum #1605M-2
Cultural Resources Assessment, Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capital Faci lity Program , Renton, King County, WA
Page 15
Lewarch, Dennis E.
2001 State of Washington Archaeological Site Inventory Form for 45Kl501, Renton High
School Indian Site. On file at Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic
Preservation, Olympia.
2006 Renton High School Indian Site (45K.I501) Archaeological Data Recovery, King County,
Washington. On file at Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic
Preservation, Olympia.
Marino, Cesare
l 990 His tory of Western Washington Since 1846. In Handbook of'North American Indians,
Vol. 7: Northwest Coast, edited by Wayne Suttles, pp. 169-179 . Smithsonian Institution
Press, Was hington D.C.
McKee, Bates
1972 Cascadia: The Geologic Evolution of the Pacific Northwest. McGraw Hill Book
Company, New York.
Metsker, C. F.
1936 King County 1936. Charles F. Metsker, P.E., Tacoma, Washington.
Morgan, Murray
1979 Puget 's Sound: A Narrative of Early Tacoma and the Southern Sound. University of
Washington Press, Seattle.
Morgan, Vera, Glenn Hartmann, Susan Axton, and Craig Holstine
1999 Cultural Context. In The SR-101 Sequim Bypass Archaeolog ical Project: Mid-to Late-
Holoc e ne Occupations on the Northern Olympic Peninsula, Clallam County,
Washington , edited by V.E. Morgan, pp. 3.1-3.36. Report prepared for Washington
D epartment of Transportation. Eastern Washington University Reports in Archaeology
and History 100-108, Archaeology and Historical Services, Cheney.
Nationwide Environmental Title Research , LLC (NETR)
2016 HistoricAerials.com. Electronic resource , http://historicaerials.com/, accessed July 14 ,
2016.
Nelson, Charles M.
t 990 Prehistory of the Puget Sound Region. In Handbook of North American Indians, Volume
7: N orthwest Coast, pp. 481-484. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
Phillips, James W.
1971 Washington State Place l'v'ames . University of Washington Press, Seattle.
Porter, Stephen C., and Terry W. Swanson
1998 Radiocarbon Age Constraints on Rates of Advance and Retreat of the Puget Lobe of the
Cordilleran Ice Sheet during the Last Glaciation. Quaternary Research 50:205-213.
CRC Technical Memorandum #1605M-2
Cultural Resources A ssessment, Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capital Facility Program, Renton , King County, WA
Page 16
Prater, Yvonne
1981 Snoqualmie Pass, From Indian Trail to Interstate. The Mountaineers, Seattle.
Robertson, Donald B.
1995 Encyclopedia of Western Railroad History, Volume III: Oregon and Washington. The
Caxton Printers, Ltd., Caldwell, Idaho.
Rooke, Lara
2008 State of Washington Archaeological Site inventory Form, 45KI786. On file at DAHP,
Olympia.
Ruby, Robert H. and John A. Brown
1992 A Guide to the Indian Tribes of the Pac(fic Northwest . University of Oklahoma Press,
Norman.
Slauson, Morda C.
1976 Renton -From Coal to Jets. Renton Historical Society, Renton, Washington.
Smith, Marian W.
1940 The Puyallup-Nisqually. Columbia University Press, New York.
1941 The Coast Salish of Puget Sound. American Anthropologist 43(2): 197-21 l.
Smith, T.
2014 Cultural Resources Survey for the WSDOT' s I-405 I SR l 67 Direct Connector Project.
Archaeological and His torical Services, Eastern Washington University, Cheney.
Prepared for Washington State Department of Transportation.
Snyder, D. E., P. S. Gale, and R. F. Pringle
1973 Soil Survey of King County Area, Washington. United States Department of Agriculture,
Soil Conservation Service, in cooperation with Washington Agriculhiral Experiment
Station.
Spier, Leslie
1936 Tribal Distribution in Washington. General Series in Anthropology, Number 3. George
Banta Publishing Company, Menasha, Wisconsin.
Steven son , Alexander E., J. Tait Eld er, Melissa Cascell a, and C hri stopher Hetzel
201 1 Cultural Resources Survey Report: Development of Three Project Sites in the Renton
Sunset Terrace Neighborhood. ICF Internati onal , Seattle. Prepared for C ity of Renton
and Renton Housing Authority.
Stipe, F.
2007 Veri zon Wireless SEA Renton Voe-Tech Cellular Tower C ultural Resources Review.
Tetra Tech, Bothell, Washington. Prepared for Verizon Wireless.
CRC T echn i ca l Memorandum #1605M -2
Cultural Resources Assessment, Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capital Facility Program , Renton , King Co unty, WA
Page 17
Suttles, Wayne, and Barbara Lane
1990 Southern Coast Salish. In Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 7: Northwest
Coast, edited by Wayne Suttles, pp. 485 -502. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington,
D.C.
Thorson, Robert M.
1980 Ice-Sheet Glaciation of the Puget Lowland , Washington, during the Vashon Stade (Late
Pleistocene). Quaternary Research 13:303-321.
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA
NRCS)
2016 Web Soil Survey. Electronic resource,
http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx, accessed July 11, 2016.
United States Geological Survey (USGS)
1895 Snohomish. Washington 1:125,000 topographic quadrangles. Scale 1:125,000. USGS,
Washington, D.C.
1897a Land classification sheet, Washington, Seattle quadrangle. Scale I: 125,000. USGS,
Washington, D. C.
l 897bLand classification sheet, Washington, Tacoma quadrangle. Scale 1: 125,000. USGS,
Washington, D.C.
1900 Tacoma. Washington 1: 125,000 topographic quadrangles. Scale 1: 125,000. USGS,
Washington, D.C.
1949 Renton Quadrangle, Washington. l:24,000. 7 .5-Minute Series. USGS, Washington, D.C.
1950 Mercer Island Quadrangle, Washington. 1 :24,000. 7.5-Minute Series. USGS,
Washington, D. C.
1983 Bellevue South Quadrangle, Washington. 1:25,000. 7.5-x-15-Minute Series. USGS,
Washington, D.C.
1994 Renton Quadrangle, Washington. 1:24,000. 7.5-Minute Series. USGS, Washington, D.C.
United States Surveyor General (USSG)
1865 General Land Office Map, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian.
Electronic resource,
http://www.blm.gov/or/landrecords/survey/yPlatViewl ~2.php?path=PWA&name==t230n
050e ~ 00 l .jpg, accessed July 13, 2016.
Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP)
2015 Survey and Inventory Standards: Washington State Standards for Cultural Resource
Reporting. Electronic document,
http://wvvw.dahp.wa.gov /siles/default/filcs/CR%20Update%202015%282%29.pdf,
accessed August 6, 2015.
2016 The Washington Information System for Architectural and Archaeological Records Data.
Electronic resource, https://secureaccess.wa.gov/dahp/wisaard/, accessed July 10, 2016.
CRC Tech nical Memorandum #1605M-2
Cultural Resources Assessment, Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capital Facility Program , Renton, King County, WA
Page 18
Washington State Department of Natural Resources (WA DNR)
2016 Washington Interactive Geologic Map. Division of Geology and Earth Resources -
Washington's Geological Survey. Electronic resource,
https://fortress.wa.gov/dnr/geology/, accessed July 14, 2016.
Waterman, T. T.
ca. 1920 Puget Sound Geography. Unpublished manuscript, Allen Library, University of
Washington, Seattle.
1922 Geographic Names Used by Indians of the Pacific Coast. Geographica l Review 12: 175-
194.
2001 sda?da? gwel dibel lesucid ?ac aciltalbix" Puget Sound Geography. Vi Hilbert, Jay
Miller, and Zalmai Zahir, contributing editors. Lushootseed Press , Federal Way,
Washington.
Wessen, Gary, and M. Lee Stilson
1987 Resource Protection Planning Process Southern Puget Sound Study Unit. An RP3
Document prepared for Washington State Department of Community Development,
Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia.
-
CRC Technical Memorandum #1605M-2
Cultural Resources Assessment, Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capital Facility Program, Renton , King County, WA
Page 19
6. Figures and Tables
\.
,.
0 ;y
.,
·i ... ::'tv ..
~ ' ' !
Figure I. Project shown o n portion~ of the [kllc vuc South. and W r\ Renton. \/,,'A. (USGS 1983. 1997 ) top ogrn ph 1c
4u,Hlrang:J..:s.
CRC Techn i ca l Memorandum #1605M-2
Cultural Resources Assessment, Renton Hou s ing Authority 2016 Capital Facility P rogram, Renton , King County, WA
Page 20
Figure 2. Cole Manor marked on aerial imagery from 2015 (base map: Google Earth).
figure 3. Evergreen Terrace marked on aeria l imagery from 2015 (base map: Google
Earth).
CRC Technical Memorandum #1605M-2
Cultural Resources Assessment, Renton Housing Autho rity 2016 Capital Facility Program. Renton , King County, WA
Page 21
Figure 4. l[illcrest Tcrracc marked on aerial imagery from 2015 (base map: Google Earth).
CRC Technical Memorandum #1605M -2
Cultural Resources Assessment. Renton Housing A uthority 2016 Capital Facility Program, Renton , King County, WA
Page 22
t,;"
l
' . r
... ! •. •' . ! ...•
\·
j ~· :,
,.
""('f ...
-~:·
l
Hillcrest , .. ,
Terrace
~ .... . . · .. . . . ......
/
Evergreen
Terrace
/
1; , ..
.~
-•• i ·
.;,/,'P h
·-1 ·--r~
, , · Cole Manor
;·r-::;-·····
. .·
··,f ........ ·.··.
. I .
j
l
., .1 . ~ '.
Figure 5. Proj ect location marked o n GL.O map (LSS(i 1865).
' {
''
., ~ . .,
,;·.,. ', .,.
;
Table I. Land patents recorded within the project (BLM 2016), a ll loeated in Township 23 N., Range 5 E ., W.M.
Name Date RL:vt Serial No. Authority Sections and Aliauots Total Acres -
Thomas J. White 4 /23/189 1 WASAA 068133 Sale-Cash Entry S Yi of SW'/• and 1'.'E'i4 of 120
SWY. of Section 4
Was hington State 11 /11 /1889 WAORAA 000126 Enabling /\ct of 1872 N Y, of Section 16 1,518,676.68
Table 2. Archaeological sites recorded within approximately two miles from the project. No archaeolog ical s ites
d' h have been recorded in or a l1acent tot e pro1ect.
Site Number S ite Type Distance from Historic Register Status Potential Project
Project Effects
45KI 786 Historic C emetery/Burial .3 4 mile NW U nevaluated. None.
45KI404 Historic Military Properties 1.47 miles W Unevaluated. None.
45KJ686 Pre Contact Feature .71 mile SW Recommended elig ible for None.
NRHP .
CRC Techn ica l Memorandum #1605M-2
Cultural Resources Assessment, Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capital Facility Program, Renton , King County, WA
Page 23
Site Number Site T_ype Distance from Historic Register Status Potential Project
Project Effects
45KI538 Historic Railroad Properties .79 mile S Recommended not eligible None.
for NRHP.
45K.1542 Historic Debris .83 mile SW Unevaluated. None.
Scatter/Concentration; Historic
Structures Not Specified
' 45K1501 Pre Contact Shell Midden 1 .5 miles WSW Recommended eligible for None.
NRJIP.
45KI821 Historic Structures Not 1.25 mile NE Unevaluated. None.
Specified
45K.1211 Historic Debris 1.49 mile SW Listed on WHR. None.
Scatter/Concentration; Historic
Mining Properties
45K1848 Historic Commercial Properties 1.42 mile SW Determined not eligible for None.
the NRJ IP.
Table 3. Register-listed historic properties recorded within 1.5 miles from the project. No historic properties have
b <l <l . d' h . een recur e m or a 11ac cnt tot e pro1ect.
Register Name Address Historic Function Built Historic Register Status Potential
Date Project Effects
Renton Fire 235 Mill Ave S Government -Fire 1939 Listed on WHR. None.
Station Station
Renton Substation, 1017 S 3rd St Industry / Processing / 1898 Listed on WHR. None .
Snoqualmie Falls Extraction -Energy
Power Company Facility
CRC Techn ical Memorandum #1605M-2
Cultural Resources Assessment, Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capital Facili ty Program, Renton, King County, WA
Page 24
Attachment A. Copies of project correspondence sent to the cultural resources staff of the
Duwamish, Muckleshoot, and Snoqualmie tribes.
July 15, 2016
Duwamish Tribe
Cecile Hansen, Chairwoman
4705 W :vfarginal Way SW
Seattle. WA 98106-1514
Re: Cultural Resources Assessment for the Renton Housing Authority Project, Renton, King
County, WA
Dear Cecile:
r am v.Titing to inform you of a cultural resources assessment for the above referenced project
and to seek additional information a bout the project area the Tribe may have that is not readily
available through other written sources. The project is located in Renton, Washington. l:3erk
Consulting is requesting this assessment on behalf of Renton Housing Authority. Renton
Housing Authority is planning for capital projects at Cole Manor (built 1981 ), Evergreen Terrace
(built 1968), and Hillcrest (built 1962-63) that will receive federal funding from the Department
of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This foderal undertaking must comply with the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Section 106 of the Kational Historic
Preservation Act.
We are in the process of reviewing available information . Background research will include a
site files search at the Washinf,>1on State Department of Archaeology and l li storic Preservation,
review of"previously recorded cu ltural resource reports, and review of pertinent published
literature and ethnographies. Results of our investigations will be presented in a technical memo.
We arc aware that not all information is contained within published sources. Should the Tribe
have additional information to support our assessment, we would very much like to include it in
o ur study. Please contact me at sonja@crcwa.com or 360-395-8879 should you wish to provide
any comments. I appreciate your assistance in this matter and look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
Sonja Kassa
Projects Manager
I )() Ho x I066A, U Al:--.SR!f)C.E ISL\SD. \\',\ 9 i,; 1 ID
PJ IO'.'>iF. i!06 ~b 5 ~J:J.IJ -~on1a(tf c::rc1.,:a.com
CRC Technical Memorandum #1605M-2
Cultural Resources Assessment, Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capital Faci lity Program, Renton, King County, WA
Page 25
July 15, 2016
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe
Laura \1urphy, Archaeologist/Cultural Resources
39015 172nd Ave SE
/\uburn, WA 98092
Re: Cultural Resources Assessment for t he Renton Housing Authority Project, Renton, King
County, WA
Dear Laura:
I am v.'Titing to inform you of a cultural resources assessment for the above referenced project
and to seek additional information about the project area the Tribe may have that is not readily
avai labl e through other written sources. The project is located in Renton, Washington. Berk
Consulting is r equesting this assessment on behalf of Renton Housing Authority. Renton
Housing Authority is planning for capital projects at Cole Manor (built 1981 ), Evergreen Terrace
(built 1968), and Hillcrest (built 1962-63) that will receive federal ftmding from the Department
of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This federal undertaking must comply with the
J\ational Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act.
\Ve are in the process of reviewing available information. Background research w ill include a
s ite fi l es search at th e Washington State Department of Archaeology a nd Historic Preservation,
review of previously recorded cultural resource reports, and review of pertinent published
literature and ethnographies. Results of our investigations will be presented in a technical memo.
We are aware that not all information is contained within published sources. Should the Tribe
have additional information to support our assessment, we would very much like to include it in
our study. Please contact me at sonja@ crcwa.com or 360-395 -8879 should you wish to providt:
any comments . I appreciate your assistance in thi s matter and look forward to hearing fr om you .
Sincerely,
Sonja Kassa
Projects Manager
PO 13ox \()(;6 8 . H!dS ~!Hl)(il·, I S !~-\;-.;O , \.VA 98 l JO
1'110:-.l :': i06 h5:).!)0i0
CRC Technical Memorandum #1605M-2
Cultural Resources Assessment, Renton Housing Authority 2016 Capital Facility Program , Renton , King County, WA
Page 26
July 15, 20 16
Snoqualmie In di a n Tri be
Steven Mu ll en-Mose s
8 130 Railroad Av e, S uite 10 3
PO Box 969
Snoqu a lmie, WA 98 065
Re: C ultural Re sources Assessment for the Renton Housing Authority Project, Renton, King
County, W A
Dear Steven:
I am writing to inform you or a cultural re sources assessment for !ht: above referenced project
and to seek additiona l informa ti on about the projec t area th e Tribe may ha ve that is not readi ly
av ai labl e through other writte n sources. T he project is located in Renton, Washing ton . Berk
Consulting is req uesti ng this asses sment on behalf of Renton Housing Authority. Renton
Housing Authority is planning for capital projects a t C ol e Ylanor (built 19 8 1), Evergreen Terrace
(built 1968), and Hill crest (built 19 62-63) that will receive fe deral funding from the Dep artmen t
of Hou si ng and Urba n Development (HUD). Thi s federal un de rtaking mu st comply w ith the
National En vironmental Policy Act {:'-JE PA) and Sec ti on 106 of th e National Hi storic
Preservation Act.
We a re in the proc ess of reviewing avai lable informa tion. Background r esearch wi ll include a
site files sea rch at the Washington State De partment of Archaeology and Hist o ric Preservation,
review of previously recorded c ultural r eso urce reports, and rev iew of pertinent published
litera ture and ethnographie s. Results of o ur inve sti gations will be present e d in a technical me mo.
We are aware that not all information is contained wi thin p ublished sources. Sho u ld the Tribe
have addi tional in form ation to s upport our as sessment, we would vt::ry much lik e to incl ude it in
our stud y. Please contact me at sonja(a)crcwa.com or 360-395-8879 sho uld you wish to prov ide
a ny comments. I a ppr eciate your assis tance in th is math:r and look forward to hearing from yo u.
S incerely,
Sonj a Kassa
Pr ojects Manager
ro Box IO(Vi8. liAf',HKll)f;t-; l:,,L\SD. \\'-\ 981 10
PH O'-"t ..lOR ~55 !JO'l?O -'IOrlJ "®' n ....... c om
CRC Technical Memorandum #1605M-2
Cultural R esources Assessment, Renton Housing A uthority 2016 Capital Facili ty P ro gram, Renton , King County, WA
Page 27
Attachment B. Proposed Inadvertent Discovery Protocol
Protocols for Discovery of Archaeological Resources
The Archaeological Sites and Resources Act (RCW 27.53) prohibits knowingly disturbing
archaeological sites without a permit from the Washington State Department of Archaeology and
Historic Preservation (DAHP), and the Indian Graves and Records Act (RCW 27.44) prohibits
knowingly disturbing Native American or historic graves.
In the event that archaeo logical resources are encountered during project implementation, the
following actions will be taken:
All ground disturbing activity at the find location will stop, and the work supervisor will be
notified immediately. The find location will be secured from any additional impacts.
The project proponent will immediately contact the agencies with jurisdiction over the lands
where the discovery is located, if appropriate. The appropriate agency archaeologist or the
proponent 's contracting archaeologist will determine the size of the work stoppage zone around
the discovery location in order to sufficiently protect the resource until further decisions can be
made regarding the work s ite .
The project proponent will consult with DAHP regarding the evaluation of the discovery and the
appropriate protection measures, if applicable. Once the consultation has been completed, and if
the site is determined to be NRHP-eligible, the project proponent will request written
concurrence that the agency or tribe(s) concurs that the protection and mitigation measures have
been fulfilled. Upon notification of concurrence from the appropriate parties, the project
proponent will proceed with the project.
Within six months after completion of the above steps, the project proponent will prepare a final
written report of the discovery. The report will include a description of the contents of the
discovery, a summary of consultation, and a de scription of the treatment or mitigation measures.
Protocols for Discovery of Human Remains
lf human remains are found within the project area, the project proponent, its contractors or
permit-holders, the following actions will be taken, consistent with Washington State RCWs
68.50.645, 27.44.055, and 68.60.055:
If ground-disturbing activities encounter human ske letal remains, then all activity will cease that
may cause further disturbance to those remains. The area of the find will be secured and
protected from further disturbance. The project proponent will prepare a plan for securing and
protecting exposed human remains and retain consultants to perform these services. The finding
of human skeletal remains will be reported to the county medical examiner/coroner and local law
enforcement in the most expeditious manner possible. The remains will not be touched, moved,
or further disturbed. The county medical examiner/coroner will assume jurisdiction over the
human ske letal remains and make a determination of whether those remains arc forensic or non-
forensic. If the county medical examiner/coroner determines the remains are non-forensic , then
the y will report that finding to DAHP, which will then take jurisdiction over the remains. DAHP
CRC Techn ical Memorandum #1605M-2
Cultural Resources Assessment, Renton Housing Authority 2016 Cap ital Facility Program, Renton , King County, WA
Page 28
will notify any appropriate cemeteries and all affected tribes of the find. The State Physical
Anthropologist will make a determination of whether the remains are Indian or Non-Indian and
report that finding to any appropriate cemeteries and the affected tribes. DAHP will then handle
all consultation with the affected parties as to the future preservation, excavation, and disposition
of the remains.
Contact Information
Duwamish Tribe
4705 W Marginal Way SW
Seattle, WA 98106-1514
Primary Contact: Cecile Hansen, Chair, 206-431 -1582
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe
39015 172nd Ave SE
Auburn, WA 98092
Primary Contact: Laura Murphy, ArchaeologistJCultural Resources, 253-876-3272
Snoqualmie Indian Nation
PO Box 969
Snoqualmi e, WA 98065
Primary Contact: Steven Mullen-Moses, Director of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, 425-
495-6097
Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation
PO Box 48343, Olympia, WA 98504-8343
Lead Representative: Allyson Brooks, State Historic Preservation Officer, 360-586-3066
Primary Contact: Rob Whitlam , State Archaeologist, 360-586-3080
Primary Contact for Human Remains: Guy Tasa, State Physical Anthropologist, 360-586-3534
King County Medical Examiner's Office
325 9 th A venue, Box 359792, Seattle, WA 98104
Lead Representative and Primary Contact: Rich ard Harruff, MD, PhD, Chief Medical Examiner,
206-731 -3232
Renton Police Department
1055 S Grady Way , Renton , WA 98057
Lead Representative: Kevin Milosevich , Chief of Police, 425-430-7500
Primary Contact: Non -Emerge ncy Number, 425-23 5-2121
CRC T echni ca l Me morandum #1605M-2
C ultural Resources Assessment, Renton Hou si ng Authority 2016 Capital Facility P rogra m , Renton, King County, WA
Page 29