The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCED Planning File . • • . • . • • �.. ��,i��a�-�. ;;��:'�'-�">� # ��o��„i . , R .. ��:�� e t t _ + � s�� E.c;or�;,�o� �r,.. �r�A.��_r:` E To: Whom it may concem .��_r'� /�.V .�..�-.4_.,�� Frorr� Einer I Handeland , Marilyn J Handeland&Carl A Handeland CC: Einer I Handeland �� -"- - �' ��-�--�.---� �j�z�,(��. _%' ,fr/��.,,��C�.:_:r�` � � Date: August 27,2003 � C,��------� Re: Annexation into the city of Renton We would like to join our neighbors John &Shirley Andrews who reside at 9606 143`� Place S.E. Renton W.A. 98059 in the annexation into the city of Renton. Our current Address is 9530143'�Place S.E. Renton W.A. 98059 Thank-you Phone: (206}799-7155 Fax: (425 793-7269 E-mail: hndlnds2@aol.com 1 8/27/03 To Whom It May Concern, This letter is to affirm that as the property owners residing at 9524 143rd Ave. SE we wish to be annexed into the City of Renton. We understand that the Andrews residing at 9606 143ra Ave. SE are planning to annex into Renton and we would like to join them in this annexation. Please contact us if you have any questions regarding this proposed annexation. We may be reached at 425-228-6369. Sincerely, Mark& Lejla Madfai �� . i �•. � N � i i' ��WPpRT � ;� � .�``� i � ��i i i' �' I `� HiLL� - %� '% ` �`�� . PORAT % ' �`"�- `�`--� `.-'� R E- ,�' z..y�T 5p ��,, ;� � `,;,----�MAY�-=`VALLEY �—=— �D. � �' �' �S �^ `�` _ F: �, �, O � :'`'ri1NDa11o� � '� �.�� Evelyn %� F,o ssZ Knowlton � %Q' ingebarg �ole ��a � i � O 51 ~�� o,M� U� I.01 Ac. 2.9 Ac. '�to� t�� ' � 9.� � �s9a�. ,� ti,. _.D36�Ac: el z """'2.18 — ssa.n _ _-_�` -- --75 � ,�so � :6 . - ��`� C,__- �-qsy i.�...-_ .. ^ '`� 3� � �� 0 `/i�, U �=_=�_.^..- �`� '��`` ��` ,` 11 O ( / 1 s a0 ��.``` � �� N � �� I � -_ �Q iL10 , I C�3z 3�s lo�3 `��- . �'' Cr. 1 ' � � ````�� I a �, " I � 4.98 AG �+ � P S P ..` TRACT A �li � i `� �`\� �. C��` I �� ' 4j ``� T RA�S L`�\ ' � N `% �� r '�`� �� F � i9 � .�,'�•� �-� ( � �� ,�� W .s .o � ��9.z ,,, ^ ' � �� 9� �M TRACT B � � , �' 3 2 } ,. I" ��v ,- R � � - -S � 1.63 AC. I.OU Ac.�� N •�'�a �+�4 � � � I /iI �. $S 5 \�i,, so.0 �o.a i ' .1 � =�" � �--- �9` N, � 26 , o ., ' P � I � �' � i ��c\ .0 � ' �R C ,�.� � i , TR D � ! � L�_$9 QG, � � � �aO m � R! � m x � e�n , � 5� � a � � :Yy i I 50 � TR f `" � a s lP�� + � O '�so. _ _ - - � •ti. � � �. �� uo �w We 03 � 49 ^a 24 • Kni 23 22 2� ,. � y g o g 7 6 ` �� ,�' A � �y _ N � , �� T Ti� E � _ o P ^ ., � � � o� •� • � ` �- '":'� � � ° .,o• •?'°� � . r, x � j t�� r�9� �y ° r ;106' �� x � � ,,� �. � �$� � �9� ,a aN.E. 24TM�F� ns.ose " L � i ."'" ""'9° �' rR i��`��n 53 I `', E aa A E N �e �+x '�1 �/ '� 7.Os ! t ye ls.9V o \ . f � L �i r .,14� O ♦�1 �tl �6 (7 18 � � ��•�w t0� `!.2 I �Z '� '� � p �3 p r � 1! „ w Sl36 7316 H7.72 � 12 �� -�C i .�, � 52 ` �j 65 2 � „ �� s 14q.11 � � � 4 � � � 2� �, 20„ 19� 18 IZ$ 15 _j4 TR X izo � , 14 ;. � ! 46 � � 1750A � � � � � _ �Y� U I S 2� � 9Q r� �s o �n 6p� °' �6 * .. d+ sr tR J i °j 15 0 � � p ( � ` ST� � 16 �k G� -..:�,�� s�o° G•(� •, ` 45 •, � ` Ii5 13�' _ _ e � �46. � �.O� ,� 13� ' �\ _�" n'��0�4. � _ p_ 9 ••`•_ ��7 ` -- �� a ��. �� v /� � i � � � lV,_`'WPORt � %�' � `' J' � =� L�J `; f;� �� `' hILI.L� '' `� � � '` '� � -� �� i -�--�,. • E._``--_ -.is� RPORATE ;; L ','r!lT 50 i ,' �i . �',:- M A-Y.=�_`VA L L E Y _ d ,, �; �; F'D. ' �' � , �ws +�? �� - , ,� o y � ,�- t6 � . i� �3 �.z ac. Evelyn •�r ��Q �s2 Knowlton � ;Q; ingeborg Cole ��a o � O s, , ,��; tl�� O �u � - .69 Ac. I.01 Ac. 2.9 Ac. �i 9� 95 ,. � ��. w., _.D.36Ac- _ �!.6 _�4=-- `.__"ii8 s�.,T -_�__^�' ws" 75 � '��.�-' 460 �,_-- r1f cj � _. - ..— .� ,r �� 330. 0 �` 1 9."'."--.._...... i +� __......_« i �'- --��_ �� i 1 « � �'� � / �t N I �� 1 .., ` �Q �o I �3.23�51�-73 '� ` " Cr. __ -_ � m IC� m `��'� ��. ' a � � I c+y 4.g�AC. �'•.\` P S P �` TRACT A � dj ��`� �, `.�`` f,, Q i T (2 4j +``� �Qrys �/ I 9 .W , Nc � I i I �.�y "`�\ ` ��. W ,9 O �� +`` ( � 390 ^�t � �5.q+ .o / i j�9.29 uo N � . _ _ �� 0 9B2i TRACT B � I � � � �^ �� Z I G- ' „ 3 � l N `V r ` ' 4 n p _ � S N 1.63 Ac. I.oU Ac.�� N .�g� �� - � x 1 - �� . /// ��7t �, �� 5 \,� q� 50.11 40.17 50 � � , , t.... ,�• N. ° °° ^ 26 �� P y I b' �' Y� i u.0 +s •�� - � i �R C µz� : � � � � TRD �. � /�r��i�'Y� �q °�'1i to � ' � [�. �1G. � � w� � � � � � � � P 5I p� N ' J N f �S � i 121� so " re F --� � � ,�•� �— - lP��, � 73 '�so. , t D •9.69 i�A.o3 412. 9 wo uo uo � 49 ,�.h " ' u 20 � y� 24 4i ' 23 22 2t � � 0 8 7 6 v ,�. ` o 9 �°' o+ E - - �1 � T � a y _ , o P � A _— ., �W • x � �ry -�6r" C .. o a's wp' �� = , �(`' a: e 4 yo' •?� �' r, 7i R � 'M � Ir{r �� r9�t �+, .� o i 106; i�! +A- 18 # 90 �P � �, . x ��$: �9� . i0 ' a�•E 24TM aC 6'• "/Z5.qg � . t � ' .:, ��°`. r � T s ci�c � � `� � •n e'sy? R f +� z��, 53 I N ��.� � � �� V /...Sb1b t. 7• m m ! ,,� l6.yy � Ca E � �6 - �, ,8 =`..��' x .. =0 9.Z 2 13 14 � � �3 P r-. o a� „ � �31a �i'L72 �' i 12 ,00 -�C � .7, �N "� 52 95 &55 zT 'H. � r !I �2'+�� ta Q * 21 � 20� 19� �8� 17 15 l� � _ - * ^`� Z � .�.. � � TR.X �i �50 0 � , 14 ;. � P 46 N 115.O�F � � � C - L^ r ,b �S .� (,� S �o 'as `0 0'r 60 1 I °! r� m �6 `" ' . TR J � °� {$ 0 4�� 55 6? ,�y4 �f z o9 * � �\�°q _r '' ` d+ � ST. 3,�g, , 16 � ��v�C,'�' � 13� '.,:�� *`� n(�'(� 45 ?• `••,\ 175 �f ' • ~ c 3 .�iti .� _ .w o ? �r�� ,�s _ �w s ��-° _. 9R, � �-. �. �_ � R� } � 9 • �� E- , Q �1 � •.� , . "��r,��_ �---•-•---Y u,o �� ;�o rd'w i�pw ,�rr� p� � � s ' � . _ ► '?��, _ _ - ' I :� . s- r � o.•e , I _,,ti � ' - •-"� , �� + ~ G �� ''�: �` � ��,' . —. .. � : �, .� i �'.�I_ � �, ar��#..,.0 ea� ( �., �`�Q5 ( l �� r� ',.,9'.5¢ls ' ,se. �� i ••� �i i� .k�^ .F �� I% � .,t''+••• �`� '.:n � �'` � NJ�41� '> r 1 ' ,�� e E '�� t�+ , �i..'�j/ �� `'. ��i � � i � � ' .. ♦;. � �..�� . �� ..!..:�Y . Y tir" t�o I 8�3� .�� .. �;� I .�. , � � �f,,,, , I ' �' . � � ; Arc ,�;.,. , � , ;� „ I � (, � � . �1� ._- - T , I I � ; � 5 � . ��C� � . � ' • � � � Eoo . � . �. ' �,�P(`d • �1 , �� •, � . . . � ( , " .I' ; i « _ ( � , i , , 1 i ' , , i , .� - ( �� . _�, � . ._.� I ��ao I , - � r . � , � � �� , , � , � . } __....,_._.�w:: . . .. _. ' ��... : � = .-=�—_ � ,_. ' _��o— — - — �a^:.......... ` ��,�`^:�3� r.c.�.;� _ � . / ;� 1o�'s .2—� �t�e 1 ct.c.e�ct., �__ � 2,0`�.. �zo I �'�s , I .. T /�a� ` i. :Sia �U� P,ro�oS e C{ Nec.� horn�t�te,g � -� --__ti �' � �2 � � I� �°� ' T ` ;I � i y.. . I I i�- 3 grt ----- — — ..� I � � t�� 3 � � . i ' II � 300 � , I ,yo 1,. .�6 4 ' ,2..i o ,'� I i 1�` ) � ' ) � � � j �� :oe yy� ; k,c � �� °� . i - ►� . � � ; d��.�s � ' • 1� �1' �� I los , � �O1 I �' . 3 i I� � 8 I . ,� ra I � � � 30� � � � / �� 3�,'�,6� .�,b.� . I . ��y� ' ___....' �— .�.. �a Oh��l� : �'o�t.! � �� l� �! g �1.� � I - (oo-v � � � � . ��Gh P�� 1��- � Ih�1 � �Imig � ��" � C� � �� ' fi � �� . �,�� . ��.�i�� k� . o. . �,q�'co�!'d � (�01�'3� k �VF�G+�i) f C�X►g1' G fl�� g��a g.�, . .._. � � ��I�I .� ��? � C�� = ��.� % . i.�,ti�� Annexation Review Form 1��,, [X ] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 50% Annexation Petition .., .�,a.��...._�.....,�,.� TO : Building Surface Water Utili �� Fire Water Utility ; � Parks Wastewater Utility JUL 1 � ��p� Police Transportation ;,�.��,1q,c�F��-�_�;�:,;�_,^,; � Public Works Maintenance Current Planning� ,,,_�v��,��»E��:;�+-��.,,�;�, : ._...�;��;�r:.r�.'n� �,u.,.:�m....._..� FROM : , �� SUBJECT . Merritt Annexation Location : ro ose -parcel Merritt Annexation site is located immediately northwest of the Stonegate Subdivision at the intersection of SE 100`h Street and Lyons Avenue NE. The subject site is 4.81 acres in size with access off Lyons Avenue NE. The site is designated RR and pre-zoned R-1. This zoning will allow a maximum of 4 units. Date Circulated: Julv 14, 2003 Comments Due: Julv 18, 2003 General Information Area : Street length : Assessed Value : Estimated Population : Current Uses Residential : Commercial : Industrial : Public : Comp Plan Designation : Future Uses: : Future Po ulation � Reviewing Department/Division: _Surface Water Utility_ 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your departmenUdivision? The proposed Merritt Annexation is located in the Green Creek sub-basin of the May Creek Basin. The sites drains to the May Valley portion of May Creek, where there are existing flooding, water quality and fish habitat problems. May Creek is located approximately 350 feet from the proposed annexation area. The downstream flooding problem would be increased due to new development of lands draining to the May Valley area, which cause increased peak rates of runoff and volumes. The City adopted May Creek Basin plan recommendation #17 requires that Full Mitigation for future increase in zoning density in areas draining to May Valley. Infiltration of runoff, if possible, should be encouraged and compliance with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual level 3 flow control standard is recommended if the zoning of the site is increase from its present King County zoning of R-1. � • 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? The site is primarily undeveloped with one single-family residence located on the property. There are now no public storm systems on the site. Public storm systems are located in Lyons Ave NE that may be able to serve the site. The King County Drainage Complaint maps and inventory show that there have been drainage complaints related to the property within the annexation area. The drainage problems appear to be related to runoff and sediment or erosion. 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your departmenUdivision? The proposed annexation does represent a logical extension of services provided by the Surface Water Utility. 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? No additional f r.ilities or staff�ernuld be needed as a result of the proposed ann n. The future development of the site may result in the construction of public storm systems that would need to be maintained and operated by the City, which would result in a minor additional cost and staff resource need, depending on how the zoning is changed and how or if the site is developed. It is expected that the new development storm water rate revenue would offset costs associated with services. 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? There appears to be no storm water facilities on the site that are currently owned or managed by King County. No new agreements or franchises are required. 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) None recommended General recommendation and comments: Maintain the R-1 Zoning designation for the site to minimize the increases to the existing downstream flooding problems. Zoning density increases would require the need to provide a higher level of storm water control, when the area within the proposed Merritt Annexation is developed; to comply with the City adopted May Creek Action Plan recommendation #17. Si nature: � ��i' � Date: ��/7— Ze�z�►� 5 ✓ Cc: Lys Hornsby John Thompson H:�File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 26-Annexations�lVlerritt Annexation\Storm ��`A ',; , . ... . _, Annexation Review Form � AUG � n � �Q�1�3 (X) 10°� Notice of Intent O 50%Annexation P ��F � ati�,;�.r!�":, , _ TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM . Economic Development, Neighborhoods &Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Merritt Annexation Location . The proposed single-parcel Merritt Annexation site is located immediately northwest of the Stonegate Subdivision at the intersection of SE 1�"'Street and Lyons Avenue NE. The subject site is 4.81 acres in size with access off Lyons Avenue NE. The site is designated RR and pre-zoned R-1. This zoning will allow a maximum of 4 units. Date Circulated: July 14, 2003 Comments Due: July 18, 2003 General Information Area . Street length : Assessed Value : Estimated Population . Current Uses Residential : Commercial : Industrial . Public . Comp Plan : Designation Future Uses: : Future Po ulation � , Reviewing Department/Division: f � ` � l. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? ��,_..__.� (Over) 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? �-,��r�i/ a�'�'��o, � /s /� c��ov� ��.�� 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? ! 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? � � ��7�'L'1��'�' � G2e,.1 !//�� ZU�-1 � � , , . ��.� a�?�� 1�r w��. � ��c��iU�o c��'d�cuso, �� 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currentiy owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? � ��i,�,�,� { �� Y��I � -- Q1��,�'lc�c d..� ��-�r� G� �-� ' G� � � � 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, piease indicate on the aitached map.) �/� General recommendation and comments: � ��iYl/YL�.Piv'?G� G��'"I.�YU1-'�(Cc..�/ �� L��_ 5 `� G��/1 c�vS-e n�e� � 1��'�1 �Gc/��0, � � �� Signature: (� _�� -03-003 � �� NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS `�� 1Q�3 UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 ��cEtv�� CITY CLCRK'�OF�'IC� (Direct Petition Method) 10% PETITION— �E�1e+=T� TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON Ciry Hall, c/o City Clerk 1055 South Grady Way. Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are the owners of not less than ten percent (10%) in acreage, according to the assessed valuation for general taacation, of property which they desire to annex to the City of Renton. We hereby advise the City Council of the City of Renton that it is our desire to commence annexation proceedings under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 of all or any part of the area described below. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. A map (Exhibit 1) and legal description (Exhibit 2) are included as part of this petition. The City Council is requested to set a date not later than sixty days after the filing of this request for a public meeting with the undersigned. 1. At such meeting, the City Council will decide whether the City will accept,reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation; 2. The City Council will decide whether to require simultaneous adoption of a proposed zoning regulation, such a proposal having been prepared and filed for the area to be annexed as provided for in RCW 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340; and, 3. The City Council will decide whether to require the assumption of existing city indebtedness by the area to be annexed. This page is the first of a group of pages containing identical text material. It is intended by the signers that such multiple pages of the Notice of Intention be presented and considered as one Notice of Intention. It may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of Intention. Page 1 of 2 � 6 I� a� �� ,'' �r�cKson, ��NsP � � WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she. is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the name that appears on record in the title to the read estate.) i�4V� $�C )Oo tH ST 3 23 fd 59 l�8 t.��j�4er�a l. 6 16-03 � '(Yl�ch a et �(Yl 1fY�e,�r�� 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Page 2 of 2 H:�DIVISION.S\P&TS\PLANNING\ANNEX\10%Noflce of Intent.doc\OD . � Assessor Parcel Records: � ~ �� _ � District Name KING COUNTY Property Name . T�e� RESIDENTIAL Present Singie Family Plat Name Use �Res Use2one) Plat Biock Water WATER System DiSTRICT Plat Lot Sewer pRIVATE System Lot Area 209524 SqFt(4.81 acres) Access PRIVATE Sectionlfownship/Range NE 3 23 5 Street pAVED Surface Assessor Legal �escription Records: Account Number 032305910807 Record 01 Number Legal Description ��5108W 548 FT OF GL 1 LESS N744.708 FT LESS C/M RGTS Assessor Residential Buiiding Records: Address 14408 SE 100TH ST 98055 Building Grade Good Building number 1 Condition Average Bedrooms 4 Year Built 1997 Baths 2 Year Renovated 0 1/2 Baths 1 Total Living SqFt 4110 3/4 Baths 0 1st Floor SqFt 1800 Stories 2 http://www5.metrokc.gov/reports/property_report.asp?PIN=0323059108 6/17/2003 •P�'int Map Page Page 1 of 1 '�' �i�� ►u��yr �t'�� • Parcel Map and Data , . . , _ � . � .di a . . .. . ' • . � � .. . . �:' ' . . . . ._ }�4 . ' V,�� ,I, � � , �1'ti ��pR_ - ................_...,.,. �.� � °1� � � e, ��. . �� . T�^. µ RY.:ArI�:,. . � �':�� `: :. .. .:::.:: . ......... " -,.:.F., .:. _. ..... , :..... ..,_ , �^ igE,' �". � - - - - '' �< =;�: ,� e - _ �_: . _ — — `i. '�{- ,� :. ��- - :.�, - - �- �`:x �" 'a.. ,�.,;s . ';�. �:� ,3 . �. �4S` . ....3E;:1�.IH-P.'.�,�..i. u i� a� :i ':� .�.{:p .�.y� e. ... ' ,...:., - '::':'�. :� ..�..;..? ' " ,...,. � . :.. �:.. -.;.. � :,�.. . .......,.`�� _ ;- , '.:�i:.. �� - ::.: ..�:.... ' �,, �. .; ,;, ....... . - n-�;�:3::. V��•� ?�.� �+...�.�i:V_ p( k.�: " ' si�'yi_F�; :_ ... __. .. 3'iF�w'.�:fr:. ...:.. . ..it. ...-. �>. . '�4 �..:r R. .�... � �;.:i,iVal . . . .._.::.•� . . � . .:. y� �::»:ui. .: ��..: _ a� Parcel Number 0323059108 Address 14408 SE 100TH ST Zipcode 98055 Taxpayer MERRITT MICHAEL M+CYNTHIA L r � The information included on Mis map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change 'hout notice.lGng County makes no representations or warranties,ex�5s or implied,as to accuracy,completeness,timeliness,or '� rights to the use-Of such information.King County shail not be liable#�any gene�al,special,indirect,incidental,or consequential - . damages includng,but not limited to,lost revenues or lost profits r+esuhing from the uSe or misuse of the infortnation contained on this map.Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by writteA Qermission of King County.' � King Countv I GIS Center I News I Services I Comments I Search � By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and condftions of the site. , � The details. http://www5.metrokc.gov/webmaps/parcelviewer/Print_Process.asp 6/2/2003 y� . ' Annexation Review Form (X) 10�Notice of Intent ( ) 50%Annexation Petition TO . Building Surtace Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportafion Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM . Economlc Development, Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Merritt Annexation Location . The proposed single-parcel Merritt Annexation site is located immediately.northwest of the Stonegate Subdivis(on at the intersection of SE l 00m Street and Lyons Avenue NE. The subject site is 4.81 acres in size with access off Lyons Avenue NE. The site(s designated RR and pre-zoned R-1. This zoning wiil allow a maximum of 4 units. Date Circulated: July 14, 2003 Comments Due: July 18, 2003 Generai information Area . Street length : Assessed Value : Estimated Population . • Current Uses Residential . Commerclal . Industrial . Public . Comp Pian : - � Designation � Future Uses: . Future Po ulation Reviewing Department Divlsio � T�a h SPo r'�a-�ioK s�rS-1 erhS 1, Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? �b, (over) ti ` 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? N�, ur9ra��.� -�-h.� �x�s�iK a��esr s�rv�� c �ro�os�dnh�ka�r�K a►�ca a�d o� nctv au-esS w��K aNhexa�tp�ar�-e� s�o�lcl r f 6�e � S��d�v�d�d �K �.c � v� wa�.id d� �� fl� c�cp�s� o1C fZ�c �xis�".9 �ro�'�'�y owK�� +d o� n e� c�� ve�oP��c.�c�-. 3. Does this propbsed annexatfon represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? yes� 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City v�tould incur as a resuit of this annexcrtion? ��Ka� �a'�spp�'a�rok s�'a� cvou.lJ ka� �G- v�y�+�v�. ur,q'►•�di"�r /�-�d� , 1� �f'ke,cx.�5�-rK� scce�� 3►kc�o.r -KG4� BG�SS' `S�Y✓/�t 7HG a�Ne�a�o n a�-�e� wo�id�bt a�-�� cKsc o��l�►e �x/sE�� r.�� ow�e•� a�d�r �v� h*�,. de�tlo atGvl�. �cr �s�s Zi�c�a��( w��f�i �w s-F r�� t �f�k ��c s�y"- �i �d pav�+ ►�s.�ki `�.��crr�' �y' ��G :�ko'kkl �t�+��U�e�cl6ve(a� �k �t.� ,�1�v� 5. . Wou l d t he C i i y ass�e owners h tp or res�onsi bi li t y fo r f a c i l i t i e s c u r r e n t l y o w n e d o r s�� managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as {�e Z a result of this annexation? .��,,�� 1�O -� e�.�-�l �k�s �'i o� . l�K►�du,. 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) I�ID. General recommendation and comments: � TG�G l vaKsP�-�-`�o ti Sys�s br v<s<on �ias i�o �..o��-s ��rD�fNq uJ�te-'►RGt� 7 ��5 Pl��pO� A�t�KP_.L'a f TD�'I G�OcS � J o� ,�oes ho`� �ac.�u-�'. Signature: Q.b� !�'(Q�`- Date: � /� O3 Trsyle��fi.. sy:�s Av�f..� Ft,ev�ew G�rda�,'i'I+I^ „�+_ i C � � Annexation Review Form (X) 10% Notice of Intent ( ) 50%Annexation Petition TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Pianning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT : Merritt Annexation Location . The proposed single-parcel Merritt Annexation site is located immediately northwest of the Stonegate Subdivision at the intersection of SE 100'”Street and Lyons Avenue NE. The subject site is 4.81 acres in size with access off Lyons Avenue NE. The site is designated RR and pre-zoned R-1. This zoning will allow a maximum of 4 units. Date Circulated: July 14, 2003 Comments Due: July 18, 2003 General Information Area . Street length : Assessed Value : Estimated Population : Current Uses Residential . Commercial . Industrial . Pubiic : Comp Plan ; Designation Future Uses: . Future Po ulation � Reviewing Department/Division: �e� ;��✓ - ��✓�� lu[�Y�r�r�, 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? �%v (Over) ,,� r ► . ` 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? ��J 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? iZ 5 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City wouid incur as a result of this annexation? Nv ii e 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? �'�� b. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) �/�k General recommendation and comments: Signature: ��l�w� Date: �`��3 � • ��/ � V��F Annexation Review Form �� l 4 ?p�3 (X) 10% Notice of Intent UT�Q�REN ( ) 50%Annexation Petition �'s�ST��s�r TO : Building Surface Water Utility-;„�,,'�.:�,��,��;.�.�,1 Fire Water Utility � �n�=��x��Y �`� Parks Wastewater Utility � Police Transportation `�� $ 2003 € Public Works Maintenance Current Planning --^.:;Af�� _; ._ ,.�, P�7�.��r . ...,...;:�.n, '.'� - � ' ; . FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods &Strategic Planning " �"�,`�AaiLL°�� _-_—_---_-=--�� SUBJECT . Merritt Annexation Location . The proposed single-parcel Merritt Annexation site is located immediately northwest of the Stonegate Subdivision at the intersection of SE 100"'Street and Lyons Avenue NE. The subject site is 4.81 acres in size with access off Lyons Avenue NE. The site is designated RR and pre-zoned R-1. This zoning wiil allow a maximum of 4 units. Date Circulated: July 14, 2003 Comments Due: July 18, 2003 General Information Area . Street length . Assessed Value : Estimated Population : Current Uses Residential . Commercial . Industrial . Public . Comp Plan : Designation Future Uses: : Future Po ulation � Reviewing Department/Division: � � a ' � �1 � �" l. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? N� • (Over) , • 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? N � �e .� P�w�ah-�t�J +� �.ii'crii� \�i�►� L.�c,-�"`�1 �h�ce�1. ��►�u:� �'� - i� W p�►+, S�(Lts�� Psil,E� • 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical e�ension of services provided by your department/division? �Ct„�s 4 t3� R-�.11s�`�tM v�.l TS ug►Ch� i.� 'M� tk�i�'�G'►✓ S�A.�u�7.E ��'�'t c� kt�►.t� �u�r'1 tL�,n,S�rV �►5ti iG U 1�.�o� a U � 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? (�i t�.r 1ZU u.��fl �t �t l3 �w✓ C�Q�'�h�t� c� �n�►✓ /�d A� i, A-e,�u�`+ 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? _ 1�vr� e�1��►*� P�SuNPt1��I cs�'r c�� c�u ''s ko,��;ihe� n� c�n.�� ci,�E� • F'(l.�u t�.t5� A�il,�� 6G�r us�� Q.��n� a l�1'0 � �1� iS P��i�� Qk�L�cs��o ibrl ��-�r► A{�rtt��S _ 6. Wouid alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) � �� General recommendation and comments: , i� e�h-cp�� c�;��r✓ ��a�:.n hi u►^t Mu�C �,� �6^�an�� rl.o ►� 1��fl � �v 4�i o�r � h..t� Q� r�t,�i Pn�►ss �� Ik istit 6�a�� A�n.�tk� r� CC��C t�,^n� �t� A� �ZS� 25�' �i ��o � '��AS'Y�' k�-t�(M 1Z,c�u�S} �c�d �b A�IuA sk� Qdla 4 u 5� A�►s��I�rCS �,,�, i'S� b�- S�' 12 Q �`5��. 'R.e�n�n• t� �g�� c� , , �t.: `�w► K+��Q'Mar. h�n��.,� 1 Signature: ��►�.v 6�w Date: 'SU i,"� ��'� "�y� 1�a�N S��.��►�,/ �� ,� �-03-003 ' ��t��'� NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS `�� 7 rQ�� UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 ��cEiv�� (Direct Petition Method) C`�Ct�ft��i�� 10% PETITION— IM E��+=�t TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON Ciry Hall, c/o City Clerk 1055 South Grady Way. Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned aze the owners of not less than ten percent (10%) in acreage, according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, of property which they desire to annex to the City of Renton. We hereby advise the City Council of the City of Renton that it is our desire to commence annexation proceedings under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 of all or any part of the area described below. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. A map (Exhibit 1) and legal description (Exhibit 2) are included as part of this pedtion. The City Council is requested to set a date not later than sixty days after the filing of this request for a public meedng with the undersigned. l. At such meeting, the City Council will decide whether the City will accept,reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation; 2. The City Council will decide whether to require simultaneous adoption of a proposed zoning regulation, such a proposal having been prepared and filed for the area to be annexed as provided for in RCW 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340; and, 3. The City Council will decide whether to require the assumption of existing city indebteclness by the area to be annexed. This page is the first of a group of pages containing identical text material. It is intended by the signers that such multiple pages of the Notice of Intention be presented and considered as one Notice of Intention. It may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of Intention. Page 1 of 2 � 6 I'r 63 ��" � �r�cKsonl ��SP /�� WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she. is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the name that appears on record in the title to the real estate.) ►�t4�8 SC ��n� s-r 323�J59t�38 �{.8t� l. 6 16-03 � '�1�ch a el �(Yl YYte,�r;� 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Page 2 of 2 H:�DMSION.S\P&TS\PLANNING\ANNEX\1096 Noflce of Intent.doc\OD � .. Assessor Parcel Records:�___.. .._._._..._ � District Name KING COUNTY � Pro e '` Property Name . T�e � RESIDENTIAL Present Single Family Plat Name Use �Res Use/Zone) Plat Block Water WATER � System DISTRICT Plat Lot Sewer pRIVATE System Lot Area 209524 SqFt(4.81 acres) Access PRIVATE SectionlTownship/Range NE 3 23 5 Street pAVED Surface Assessor Legal Description Records: Account Number 032305910807 Record 01 Number Legal Description 032305108W 548 FT OF GL 1 LESS N744.708 FT LESS C/M RGTS Assessor �esidential Buiiding Records: Address 14408 SE 100TH ST 98055 Building Grade Good Building number 1 Condition Average Bedrooms 4 Year Built 1997 Baths 2 Year Renovated 0 1/2 Baths 1 Total Living SqFt 4110 3/4 Baths 0 1st Floor SqFt 1800 Stories 2 http://www5.metrokc.gov/reports/property_report.asp?PIN=0323059108 6/17/2003 �, Print Map Page Page 1 of 1 � "�'. ��l��j ��' �� ' � , �.'!i� � Parcel Map and Data .. . . . , .. . . ��+a�f . ' .��s� p� a4 ��i�� 'j' ��,i. � ,i i�. f' . � /�F' ?� �� ' �`I�'�a 5. b . . �• • . ". , ' .' ,,�� t i� I� �i �i.� '�I � '� ��i ! � , �'t'!1 �3�. . _ . �...... ....... . � � � h �. � '' '�� *��'� ,� � �� •� �� • z �.��. � �� . �F �i. ' ,��'� . � _:'.i:: ...:.. :........... ....::.... :..:. %: . ..�.: ::... ._ �': '8E=i '� . . - :„. ;. ��,� , .,. .. ,.. - . _. . :. ..::.: _ > `^ ;� �;:. . ., _ -_.,a,' .w.e i: �'i f' .sv�� ,"3> . � . . . ..r..:...'.' ::;:.. ... ..y. _ .;.s.. :_,,.__. ....: .. ; ,. � � .: . :- ....�.: � - sS' �: i ;��',.. a ,y� '�: , SE-_f � r�.�� f.��o-.� � z; . �� -. �k1.PE,..�. 'i. -z I:a �� I '{�:`:: ,y' , �.�, i:�,e V�� .... _.�. ._ _ ....,. ..,,�;:�:, •,. _ �., _. _ z::: ,... ;' � .. : _:.. -.__ ,., . . . . . . � , !�ffi' , _.,.. _ - �`^�.;s = - .� �,� - .� . :. ,: .... , ..: ; - - - ; .. `, mt= a� , . � ` _ .`.�$.::':•'��3 '�3 - - =�.j�i _ �y.�.�_ '?,y':.:_:� �'eka �:11 i' Parcel Number 0323059108 Address 14408 SE 100TH ST Zipcode 98055 Taxpayer MERRITT MICHAEL M+CYNTHIA L � � information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variery of sources and is subject to change ' out notice.IGng County makes no representations or warranties,e�eSs or implied,as to accuracy,completeness,timeliness,or '} rights to the use�Of such information.King County shail not be liabie�any general,special,indirect,incidentai,or consequential . damages including,but not limited to,lost revenues or bst profits�esulting from the uSe or misuse ot the information contained on this map.Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibfted except by writien permission of King County.' � Kin�County I GIS Center I News I Services I Comments I Search � By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. , . The details. http://www5.metrokc.gov/webmaps/parcelviewer/Print_Process.asp 6/2/2003 R� �`�� a � � JUL. 1 6 �0Q3 Annexation Review Form � E��N��o�dr�t,��L,�r � NEIGHE�.,,7�a��-,;,,- A;JD STR;' ��,...,�.::r.:. . ', (X) 10°� Notice of Intent ( ) 50%Annexation Petition �v�.`�`µ` TO . Buiiding Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM ; Economic Development, Neighborhoods &Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Merritt Annexation Location : The proposed single-parcel Merritt Annexation site is located immediately northwest of the Stonegate Subdivision at the intersection of SE 1001h Street and Lyons Avenue NE. The subject site is 4.81 acres in size with access off Lyons Avenue NE. The site is designated RR and pre-zoned R-1. This zoning wiil allow a maximum of 4 units. Date Circulated: Julv 14, 2003 Comments Due: July 18, 2003 General Information Area : Street length : Assessed Value : Estimated Population . Current Uses Residential . Commercial : Industriai . Public . Comp Plan : Designation Future Uses: : Future Po ulation � Reviewing Department/Division: � s l. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant probiems for your department/division? /V� (Over) 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? f, I. ' \ � �.�:,� ��/ VV,;�.� k,'h� ' �G l 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? ��7 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City wouid incur as a result of this annexation? �� 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Wouid new agreements or franchises be required as a resuit of this annexation? �� 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) �1� General recommendation and comments: . ,, '�� C .3 Signature: .�. ' Date; � � � . • • ��, Annexation Review Form �� VE',� 'y2o (X) 10% Notice of Intent ( ) 50%Annexation Petition�TT 1'pF �3 �i�y.SRs��oM TO . Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM . Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Merritt Annexation Location : The proposed single-parcel Merritt Annexation site is located immediately northwest of the Stonegate Subdivision at the intersection of SE 1�"'Street and Lyons Avenue NE. The subject site is 4.81 acres in size with access off Lyons Avenue NE. The site is designated RR and pre-zoned R-1. This zoning will aliow a maximum of 4 units. Date Circulated: July 14, 2003 Comments Due: July 18, 2003 General Information Area : Street length : Assessed Value : Estimated Population : Current Uses Residential . Commercial : Industrial . Public . Comp Plan : Designation Future Uses: : Future Po ulation � Reviewing Department/Division: �i��_��_ 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? �� (Over) } 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? � 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? �/�-,fj. ` 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?�� / � 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? ould new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? � �� / b. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) G- �i��l� o �u�y� �/:� �G`�.��1 �B�'"/�G..s�v�.`� J��t�� .x-l�,�-y �vr-�U� y ,�-a�'�a�,v - ✓,d�lpc�/� l�vprJL�� L.l7 � / �: .�L- r�vavG,D General recommendation ancf com��i�Lt��%�.�6- `6LdG�E� /�.p� :�� Signatur : Date: � `� U� � �i-03-003 ��v�� NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS �� 7 �Qa3 UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 RECEiVED CiTY CL�RK'�0��'ICE (Direct Petition Method) 10% PETITION— 1M E��_�� TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON City Hall, c/o City Clerk 1055 South Grady Way. Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are the owners of not less than ten percent (10%) in acreage, according to the assessed valuation for general t�ation, of property which they desire to annex to the City of Renton. We hereby advise the City Council of the City of Renton that it is our desire to commence annexation proceedings under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 of all or any part of the area described below. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. A map (Exhibit 1) and legal description (Exhibit 2) are included as part of this petidon. The City Council is requested to set a date not later than sixty days after the filing of this request for a public meeting with the undersigned. 1. At such meeting,the City Council will decide whether the City will accept,reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation; 2. The City Council will decide whether to require simultaneous adoption of a proposed zoning regulation, such a proposal having been prepared and filed for the area to be annexed as provided for in RCW 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340; and, 3. The City Council will decide whether to require the assumption of existing city indebtedness by the area to be annexed. This page is the first of a group of pages containing identical text material. It is intended by the signers that such multiple pages of the Notice of Intention be presented and considered as one Notice of Intention. It may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of Intention. Page 1 of 2 � � l7 63 �'�" � �r'cKsont �1�NS� / � WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the name that appears on record in the title to the real estate.) 1. 6 16-03 I�t4�8 SC +�n� S-r Qf323�5915�18 �{,8l� '�1►cha ei YYl YYle,�r i� 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Page 2 of 2 H:�DIVISION.S\P&TS\PLANNING\ANNIX\1096 Notice of Intent.doc\OD � Assessor Parcel Records:M___. .__._.___.. _. _ _ , � District Name KING COUNTY Property Name . T�ee� RESIDENTIAL Present Single Family Plat Name Use �Res Use2one) Plat Block Water WATER System DISTRICT Piat Lot Sewer pRIVATE System Lot Area 209524 SqFt(4.81 acres) Access PRIVATE Sectionlfownship/Range NE 3 23 5 Street pAVED Surface Assessar Legal Description Records: Account Number 032305910807 Record 01 Number Legal Description ��05108W 548 FT OF GL 1 LESS N744.708 FT LESS C/M RGTS Assessor Residentia! Building Records: Address 14408 SE 100TH ST 98055 Building Grade Good Building number 1 Condition Average Bedrooms 4 Year Built 1997 Baths 2 Year Renovated 0 1/2 Baths 1 Total Living SqFt 4110 3/4 Baths 0 1 st Floor SqFt 1800 Stories 2 http://www5.metrokc.gov/reports/property_report.asp?PIN=0323059108 6/17/2003 � Print Map Page Page 1 of 1 �' �it1� ��1�' � �� Parcel Map and Data . . . .. , . . �r.�a' ��d'�'�➢'y„q{' ,I`9�y'y� � ;Ap S • , � . � � . ,. ... 3 B �� " ' � .. , � ' �y, �,I rt14 k q ICg��VlB 9 � �� .;'�'.��:' . � ' � ...._. . . . �� ` � '� ' .'`+fa,. ��ib `� ' '`�' �".;b . � :�'n&,,• ' '�S� � Z� ��;h .. . .._ ' ' � . . . .. . .a.�. .. �.: .-:..... .......... � ... .� . _ �+�^ pY . .-.. .. ... ..' ...... � ^ . `k4Y � :i H� i� . . ,. .. . :�,..r,... , .. , .,. . $E, ., �;; ;l ',�.. _ ' " .k�>;. , -_ A':, � . ... - � � �di :i ;��F. . __ P� �4.r p�y� 4. q�''^�'�s:. 'k� " ' - � �''.� ; .::� . �..::_:.:.�.;::::: ;:. �: . � . .. ......... .:::.' � . �y ...::_...�. _ �.,::e��:.'. . . '._ . ' �; a. :, � `Y: , � ��StVr . , .gE`��.�x�.._.. ,�y. '� #:.i��.YP � . >�. S 4 :y - j: - ��.k �' _ . ,..;._ e.. � _ ....��.; ;� _ �... .� .-"i..: - ;j �.:. _ _ .•::. �f__{ _ _ 's; ��v .>,�� ",� - - ' ' �'�� - �:i% . ,� . .. . `�. Parcel Number 0323059108 Address 14408 SE 100TH ST Zipcode 98055 Taxpayer MERRITT MICHAEL M+CYNTHIA L � � iniormation included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variery of sources and is subject to change 'thout�otice.King County makes no representations or warranties,eXp�Ss or impiied,as to accuracy,completeness,timeliness,or �� rights to the use�of such intormation.King County shail not be liabie€�'any general,special,indirect,incidental,w consequential . damages including,but not limited to,lost revenues or last profits r+esuRing from the uSe or misuse of the infortnation contained on this map.Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by writleri rmission of King County.' � King Countv I GIS Center I News I Services I Comments I Search � By visiting this and other IGng County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. , . � The details. http://www5.metrokc.gov/webmaps/parcelviewer/Print_Process.asp 6/2/2003 � �.`�,. .�. Annexation Review Form JUL 1 5 ��3 EGOfVGh?�^DE;_ :._CVT. (X) 10% Notice of Intent ° NF�G�i<<' '' ( ) 50%Annexation , y . �:��a TO ; Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM . Economic Development, Neighborhoods &Strategic Pianning SUBJECT : Merritt Annexation Location . The proposed single-parcel Merritt Annexation site is located immediately northwest of the Stonegate Subdivision at the intersection of SE 100�'Street and Lyons Avenue NE. The subject site is 4.81 acres in size with access off Lyons Avenue NE. The site is designated RR and pre-zoned R-1. This zoning will ailow a maximum of 4 units. Date Circulated: July 14, 2003 Comments Due: July 18, 2003 General Information Area : Street length : Assessed Value : Estimated Population : Current Uses Residential . Commercial : Industrial : Public : Comp Plan : Designation Future Uses: : Future Po ulation � Reviewing Department/Division: �U(�� 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? � d (Over) � 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? �� 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logicai extension of services provided by your department/division? C S 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City wouid incur as a result of this annexation? 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? ��Q b. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) �� General recommendation and comments: �(frC � fzJ`'�/C C:� /Ct.�-s'" �/Gc� �i-L La l� /Gi fL�c�•C" � _ �Gf��%✓�--L �"�f � 3 Signature: Date: a• � MERRITT II ANNEXATION FISCAL ANALYSIS SHEET Units Po ulation AV Existin dev. 5 13 $1,953,300 Full dev. 17 43 $6,800,000 Assumptions: 2.5 persons/household $400,000 AV/new unit $220,000 AV/existing unit Fi�v�r�ues : ::: Total revenues Existin Full Rate Existing $8,225.19; Re ular lev $6,229 $21,683 3.18871 Full :':;:::;:;$2�;3��:65 Excess lev $173 $603 0.08865 State shared revenues Rate er ca Existin Full Li uor tax $3.52 $45.76 $149.60 Li uor Board rofits $5.04 $65.52 $214.20 Fuel tax - roads $14.46 $187.98 $614.55 Fuel tax- arterials $6.47 $84.11 $274.98 MVET $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cam er excise $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Criminal �ustice $0.36 $4.68 $15.30 Total $388.05 $1,268.63 Miscellaneous revenues Rate Existin Full Real estate excise* $40.86 $531.18 $1,736.55 Utilit tax** $133.20 $666.00 $2,264.40 Fines &forfeits'` $18.33 $238.29 $779.03 Total $1,435.47 $4,779.98 * Per capita ** Per housing unit- based on $2,220 annual utility billing C� 6%tax rate Gdsts:.:::.:::..::....: Total ongoing costs Per ca ita Existin Full Existing ;:;:;;,,,.$7,524,55 Contracted Services Full $�B;��Q:'65 Alcohol $0.23 $2.95 $9.65 Public Defender $3.13 $40.74 $133.20 Jail $7.19 $93.50 $305.66 Subtotal $137.19 $448.50 � Court/le al/admin. $57.08 $742.04 $2,425.90 G1�,�r� Parks maintenance* $14.90 $193.70 $633.25 U� `,�� Police $270.00 $3,510.00 $11,475.00 Road maintenance*' N/A .00 $�B8' Fire'`'`'` $1.25 $2,441.63 $8,500.00 Total $7,524.55 $28,770.65 * See Sheet Parks FIA " See Sheet Roads FIA *** Rate per$1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) Net fiscal impact Existing ' "$7�U FuII'':::::::::::::'. 436;:. On�tir�ie cosf5;: Parks acquisition & development (from Sheet Parks FIA): Other one-time costs: $10,866.00 �"��1 Total one-time costs: : :_::$`1.0;866:Ofl: Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo r . PARKS ACQUISTION AND MAINTENANCE COST CALCULATION SHEI Needs: MERRITT II ANNEXATION Acquisition of land for new neighborhood &community park Development of new neighborhood &community parks Maintenance of neighborhood &community parks Assumptions: $60,000 per acre for land acquistion $125,000 per acre for development (both neighborhood &community parks) $6,000 per acre to maintain neighborhood parks $7,000 per acre to maintain community parks 1.2 acres/1,000 for neighborhood park(LOS in Comprehensive Park Plan) 1.1 acres/1,000 for community park (LOS in Comprehensive Park Plan) 43 population after 10 years (projected growth) 17 housing units after 10 years (projected growth) $530.76 per single family unit mitigation fees 14 New single family units Per capita annual and one-time costs: One-time Costs: Acquisition: Neighborhood: 1 * 1.2/1000 * $60,000= $72.00 Community: 1 * 1.1/1000 * $60,000= $66.00 Development: Neighborhood: 1 " 1.2/1,000 " $125,000= $150.00 Community: 1 " 1.1/1,000 * $125,000= $137.50 Total one-time costs: $425.50 Mitigation fees: New units" $530.76 = $7,430.64 Acquisition &development costs minus mitigation fees: $10,865.86 Ongoing costs : (1 * 1.2/1,000 '` $6,000) + (1 * 1.1/1,000 * $7,000) _ $14.90 (park maintenance) s . ROADS MAINTENANCE CALCULATION SHEET FOR SCENARIO A Zone AREA Linear feet R-4 0 0 0 (assumes 155 linear fUac) R-5 28.2 28.2 4230 (assumes 150 linear fUac) R-6 0 0 0 (assumes 150 linear fbac) R-8 0 R-8 0 R-8 0 R-8 0 R-8 0 R-8 0 216 0 (assumes 145 linear ft/ac) R-10 0 0 0 (assumes 140 linear fUac) 4230 Estimated total linear feet of new roadway Existing 0 0 0 Total linear feet of existing roadway $0.00 Annual cost for existing roadways Total 4230 Total estimated linear feet of roadway at full development $5,288 Annual roadway maintenance cost at fuil develop. �- I �,�- �1 I5 Revised 8-29-03 per Finance Memo - Y ��h�. _. PROPOSED MERRITT ANNEXATION FISCAL ANALYSIS CALCULATION SHEET Units Po ulation AV Existin dev. 1 2 $590,000 Full dev. 4 10 $1,160,000 Assumptions: 2.5 persons/househoid $290,000 AV/new unit 1 existing house will not redevelop Rev�i�i�es:i:: Total revenues Existin Full Rate Existing ;;; ;$2;�:93:�4: Re ular lev $1,881 $3,699 3.18871 Full:::::::::::::.$5;1�7;9i�': Excess le $52 $103 0.08865 State shared revenues Rate er ca Existin Full Li uor tax $3.30 $6.60 $33.00 Li uor Board rofits $5.29 $10.58 $52.90 Fuel tax- roads $14.45 $28.90 $144.50 Fuel tax- arterials $6.76 $13.52 $67.60 MVET $0.36 $0.72 $3.60 Cam er excise $0.00 $0.00 Criminal 'ustice $0.91 $1.82 $9.10 Total $62.14 $310.70 Miscellaneous revenues Rate Existin Full Real estate excise" $40.86 $81.72 $408.60 Utilit tax"' $133.00 $133.00 $532.00 Fines &forfeits" $17.77 $35.54 $177.70 Total $250.26 $1,118.30 * Per capita "* Per housing unit- based on $2,220 annual utility billing ��{�;;;::,:;;:; ;'::: Totai ongoing costs Per ca ita Existin Full Existing::::;::::$1;�3Q:33: Contracted Services Full::: ::':': ';:$�;��:4;1:3s Alcohol $0.23 $0.45 $2.27 Public Defender $3.13 $6.27 $31.34 Jaii $7.19 $14.38 $71.92 Subtotal $21.11 $105.53 Court/le al/admin. $50.96 $101.92 $509.60 Parks maintenance` $14.90 $29.80 $149.00 Police $270.00 $540.00 $2,700.00 Road maintenance** $0.00 $400 Fire*"* $1.25 $737.50 $1,450.00 Total $1,430.33 $5,314.13 * See Sheet Parks FIA ** See Sheet Roads FIA *'* Rate per$1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) Net fiscal impact Existing:::::::''':�7��3;41: Full . : �$1.8�:�3 fl�tii�ie;costs; Parks acquisition &development (from Sheet Parks FIA): $21,319.60 Other one-time costs: $0.00 Total one-time costs: ::::`::::::::��1;�1:9;6Q CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: July 21, 2003 TO: Dave Christensen FROM: Rebecca Lind SUBJECT: Legal Descriptions for New Proposed Annexations We have received four requests during the last six weeks for annexation using the new direct petition method passed by the legislature and signed by the governor this last May. I have attached maps for three of these that are going to have their first public meeting before Council on August 4"' to decide whether the City will accept, modify, or reject these applications. We anticipate that all three will be adopted with Mossier modified to include abutting streets. We are requesting your help in creating legal descriptions for these three annexations. These will be used with all legal notifications as well as the eventual ordinances bringing these annexations into the City if sufficient signatures are obtained and the Council accepts them. I have attached maps for the three annexation areas. Please call Don Erickson, if you or your staff have any questions. Thank you, Attachments: (3) cc: Don Erickson Documentl\d �� .;- CITY OF RENTON ••LL Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning 1 Tanner,Mayor Alex Pietsch,Administrator August 7,2003 Tom Hoffman, Manager King County Water District No. 90 15606—SE 128`�Street Renton,WA 98059 SUBJECT: MERRITT ANNEXATION Dear Tom: Abdoul Gafour asked that I write you and inform you that we have received a request to commence annexation for the 4.81 acre Merritt Annexation site due west of Stonegate at NE Lyons Avenue and SE 100"'Street. The site is within KCWD#90 and could support up to dwelling units. There currently is one dwelling on this single parcel site. The owners of record are Michael Merritt and his wife. On Monday,August 4,2003 the Renton City Council authorized the circulation of the 50% Petition to Annex for this 4.81-acre site. Since there is only one parcel we anticipate receiving this petition back in the week or so and will begin processing it. Typically,it will be another three or four months before the process is completed and the site could come into the City. If you have any questions about this annexation I can be reached phone at 425-430-6581 or by email at derickson@ci.renton.wa.us . Sincerely, ✓ Donal . Erickson,AICP Senior Planner/Strategic Planning cc: Rebecca Lind �e�"�e��'� R E N T O N 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 �This paper contains 50%recycled matenal.30%post consumer A H E A D O F T H E C U R V E .��,w RE�� .�,�j,�� N0V 2 � �C103 'G�,oaw ��N;r ECONOMIC UE�ELOPM�NT, ''�.'.��:_, '''� NEIGHBORHOOUS, , AND STRATErIC PLA�VNING -s :. Department of Assessments Scott Noble King County Administration Bldg. Assess��• 500 Fourth Avenue,Room 708 Seattle,WA 98104-2384 (20�296-5195 FAX(20�296-0595 Email:assessor.info@metrokc.gov www.metrokc.gov/assessor/ ANNEXATION PETITION CERTIFICATION THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition submitted November 3, 2003 to the King County Department of Assessments by Don Erickson, Senior Planner for the City of Renton, supporting the annexation to Renton of the properties described as the Merritt Annexation, has been examined, the property taxpayers, tax parcel numbers, assessed value, and acreage of properties listed thereon carefully compared with the King County tax roll records, and as a result of such examination, found to be sufficient under the provisions of the New Section of Revised Code of Washington, Section 35.13.002. The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signature on the petition is valid through comparison with any record of actual signatures, nor that the signature was obtained or submitted in an appropriate time frame, and this document does not certify such to be the case. Dated this 19th day of November, 2003 �# ��-�-�--�---�--- Scott Noble, Kin County Assessor �a�1202M � � � ' �r y6tl� �43�c�a l�zl�l��a� S�: �i�?ltc�t"�, inlT�, ��n�9-375� ��tc�l��r ?9#'� , ?�1�� on ��'i _r.k�c�t� ��75i O�' ��c�i'1i'��:T' �,c�nc�iri�r; ��vP�c��'ixr.tent# N�1g1�1�n-t-�«�� St�r�t�t�:i.c° ri�i�r��.�'ic� 4.��V �7i K�'�i�U]�] �ll'7'� ��jt1.�f� tat!YU�f �1cA�/ i_� �'C'(=.''III=()f1� lNH `9?Slj7'J r�r+� ,-' _ _ , �_ � r___ �_�__i-� _ _�� .�r �u'a� Pd�' .�r !_Jf s^�(-�4%CJ�'C� t.U� _'__ __— � _ __�,c��;��,�s�_�s.�,ee�c��r.,_�_•,5 _,__ �Jf'�� l . �S -�-l:K}(}[1� L�_ '1L_ Ll� l l L-_' _ L___ ii�a��iu� ¢�r c',�,-i��y �Ui�,�� aii �,�A.�i; �.��e i��y V�� t��.s.�ar� ��,�,��_�,� �i�d� C3 ) )r CJ�t:Il l��f= l.<_1..� L S-7 l.j_.I.�it:iA:i`ti�^t lC)5`��1_l'�� c111JlCzc=r'!1.1.L]ll- �L '�.-''ci�e'_ t[ '-- �_�.- ! � i c!_�� j l l E' ('1 ___"i" _r '__ _'_"� _i_ _"'t � iL' _ ""_ _'_�_ i_ __" '_ m'� _ _ ii"_��_� __a__�._� �7!'i..� s j C.l� r �'.4=:CJ ' MAY VALLEY PREZONE - PHA�� Il °� F'•igure 6 Percent Slope � ; . W � i i - � , � I Q �� , + , i � � j i '� J ' '� � � � � � I � � , + ' , � 1 � � � � �� ' li ` � � ?''f��/ I�I �� I � l Q;;c, � � � ii.:.� ' i { �, � I % 'C�/ , � � I � I. � p � �I� �., ! ii � � o � �' i { `�j��\ � I I I � ✓ ' ' 1 ; ' � , b... (� i b'.., � � „ �Jz��'� � . 'i /, �� ..� > i � �,. �a E f-� � ¢ o �t � � cn i i ��, G`. ' � 26 ` n / U � o �� f... �� '' O ' i �6" ��' ;�,, �j aD, i � oj1.3��i � , 'I , � � t c'�g � _ I I.. I � a j ! � i �� ! � y ;� � � , �� , �'�J��t�� ' , I � i I � � ` � ( ! ��r-;---r ; ' ' E i 0��d f � ' '' , ', ; ' ; � y� " �� ; r---- ,� �`��, '`,, , , � , , . � � � I 1 i � r � � `� � .� ,, i � . , ', ,-,, 1 ,. _ / �I ` i \ � \ �I I ` � � ; ' / � � �, _,.. �� ', ' � �ii i I I r'�""' ��,.�� , 1 � ;'--, --I '� � � i ; , ` �� t — �-� � i � i i � � �, ' ��---i�- ��-i ��,�; � �--'� , j-� — � S� �I � �'� � � ` � �� ' � � t � � � � � < ' , � , � I � �, i' � � �,,-, � ti'�Y Planning and Technical Services �� S:opes ?0� and greater ♦ � ♦ Planning/Building/Public Works '`'_� Slopes 25� to 40� O. Denniso+�, R. MacOr+ie �+ Y2 Decen�bx 1996 � S�opes 15� to 25% �' Q 6�� 1 ,�d0 ..�..-.�—�••• Pnase II 3o�,�ndary � 1 :7,200 w � . � 1 ;�L � � � �� Annexation Review Form �I�S� �� (X) 10% Notice of Intent ( ) 50%Annexation Petition �� ((�� / TO . Building Surface Water Utility U""�- Fire Water Utility � Parks Wastewater Utility l�`l �j� Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning �"�� FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT : Proposed Merritt II Annexation Location . Subject parcels are located in the NE 1/4 of 03-23-05 in the vicinity of Summerwind/Stonegate. The area is bounded by Lyons Avenue NE on the east, SE 100"'Street, if extended, on the south, and approximately 142'�Avenue SE, if extended, on the west. Date Circulated: November 19, 200,3 Comments Due: November 26. 2003 General Information Area : Approximately 20.59 acres. Street length (pubiic) : 200 linear feet(existing); 2,300 linear feet (est. for buildout) Assessed Value : $1,953,300(existing development) Estimated Population : 13 persons Current Uses Residential ; 5 single family detached units Commercial : Industrial : Public . Comprehensive Plan : Residential Rural (prezoned R-1) Designation Future Uses: . Detached single-family residential units Future Po ulation : 48 ersons 19 housin units . Reviewing Department/Division: ��i�! w�Z-�L-. 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? �"� 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service (Over) � provision to the area? 3, Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? 4. Can you provide a rough dollar figure estimate of the cost to provide service to this area at current development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, such as new parks, the City would incur as a result of this annexation? 5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provisian of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) General recommendation and comments: signature: �t�-a^% � � Date: �- ��' '�3 � �-��- l"�,�� e �� .� �� . Annexation Review Form � y�� `��'� �• (X) 10%Notice of Intent �� 0 ( ) 50%Annexation Petiti��G �'' TO . Building Surtace Water Utility ,S�Q�L Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM . Economic Development, Neighborhoods &Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Proposed Merritt II Annexation Location . Subject parcels are located in the NE 1/4 of 03-23-05 in the vicinity of Summerwind/Stonegate. The area is bounded by Lyons Avenue NE on the east, SE 100"'Street, if extended, on the south, and approximately 142`�Avenue SE, if extended, on the west. Date Circulated: November 19, 2003 Comments Due: November 26. 2003 General Information Area : Approximately 20.59 acres. Street length (public) . 200 linear feet(existing); 2,300 finear feet (est. for buildout) Assessed Value . $1,953,300(existing development) Estimated Population : 13 persons Current Uses Residential : 5 single family detached units Commercial : Industrial . Public . Comprehensive Plan : Residential Rural (prezoned R-1) Designation Future Uses: . Detached single-family residentiai units Future Po ulation : 48 ersons 19 housin units . Reviewing Department/Division: ��'��inlG= 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? /'1�� 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service /`��' (Over) � provision to the area? 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? �C: � 4. Can you provide a rough dollar figure estimate of the cost to provide service to this area at current development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, such as new parks, the City would incur as a result of this annexation? �� 5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicote on the aitached map.) /�0 General recommendation and comments: Signature: ' ,.�� "� ^ Date: /�'l/� d � � Do � � �o * D � � � � Q � � � �� c,� � 0 � � Q � � ' � � V�� KK.v .. ._ . . � .- - t 9 �Ph,- ,t � �� .� �� •.- ., ,� n �4 ; � �_ " �� '�•• " ' _ - '- . . � � � � � � ❑ [�� [� �] �� Thb dowment h a fntmded Mraa��toti�`N Ea�tsd ahhmm. to aurvey xwrxX boead m M�Deat informotbn ovoi e a Tlib map b for dbVbY W��7�^s on1y. Proposed Merritt Annexation o 200 400 Figure 3: Existing Structures Map 1 : 2400 ti� o„�, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning � Exlsting StR1Ctu�e ♦ � � Alex Pietsch,Administrator --- Renton City Limits G.Del Rosario ��°NTo'� 3 November 2003 0 Proposed Annexation Area � , �_03_�3 �� CITY OF RENTON �e vt's�c�> NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMIV�NCE OCT 2 9 2003 ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS Cm•CLERK'S�FICE UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 (Direct Petidon Method) �10%PETTTION— i�YI E�� ANN�?��ATIOi� TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF SiTBMITTED BY: !�%k� �'YI r r,r%7`f THE CITY OF RENT'ON ADDREss: 15��v� s� toc�r� . City Ha11, c% City Clerk ��n+�y-� t��.s � 1055 South Grady Way PHONE: i��s-�� -`�Y°� Renton, WA 98055 � � The undersigned are the owners of not less than ten percent (10%) in acreage, according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, of property, which they desire to annex to the City of Re�ton. We hereby advise the City Council of the City of Renton that it is our desire to commence annexation proceedings under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.124 of all or an�part of the-area described below. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is condguous to the City of Renton. A map (Exhibit 1) and legal description (Exhibit 2) are included as part of this petition. The City Council is requested to set a date not later than sixty days after the filing of this request for a public meeting with the undersigned. � 1. At such meeting,the City Council will decide whether the City will accept,reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation; 2. The City Council will decide whether to require simultaneous adoption of a proposed zoning regulation, such a proposal having been prepared and filed for the area to be annexed as provided for in RCW 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340; and, 3. The City Council will decide whether to require the assumption of existing city indebtedness by the area to be annexed. This page is the first of a group of pages containing identical text material. It is intended by the signers that such multiple pages of the Notice of Intention be presented and considered as one Notice of Intention. It may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of Intention. Page 1 of 2 WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the name that appears on record in the title to the real estate.) 1�-��- �- i y4o8 s� too=� s-r o3�3a aq �-�3 � 1. � Mt�,i�ae� Y►1 +f�'t err• �-�- �Etsto N Wt�s 1{ �►S(35q 2. �o-l� �lo�(Q I�I3fd i�l.s.t- - O 3 n �J H nd�'tt,v� �en'�'o,n� l�a 4�O��i (5 3 2'�d 59D73 iS r S� cu ' �J`521f i�f3r� �L 5�F- 3. �ev��s-.� U/A• `'1Bo� 3`f2.y°�9o19 a..1�.5"�c_ �'r c=- d!?Qa� i . . �c�-t�- �� 33 /�f3 A-►�� s� 4. G� D323o�9a�f �a�e r-�- E. 61 a�er� l�P1ri�'► �� 9�s� 7 jo• �� i0-l�' G��i, ►�i�n�c�� q53a iW3�.� �i. s� 5. �.,•.k,� t.vA ctgvSv 3yZ�-Ic�59vT 6 c�. to3 �Rr• o'a �-��. 6. 7. 8. 9. lo. . -i�..� Z�.S�7�=�-r� Page 2 of 2 H:\DIVISION.S\P&TS\PLANNING\ANNEX�10%Noflce of Intent.doc\OD . ��a " �� , 0' a� � � Annexation Review Form ��''�� o �po� c� c�,�, •° � (X) 10% Notice of Intent O 50°�Annexation Pe#�i�i�in . _,�s TO . Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUB.lECT . Proposed Merritt II Annexation Location . Subject parcels are located in the NE 1/4 of 03-23-05 in the vicinity of Summerwind/Stonegate. The area is bounded by Lyons Avenue NE on the east, SE 100"'Street, if extended, on the south, and approximately 142`�Avenue SE, if extended, on the west. Date Circulated: November 19, 2003 Comments Due: November 26. 2003 General Information Area : Approximately 20.59 acres. Street length (public) . 2� linear feet(existing); 2,3� linear feet (est. for buildout) Assessed Value . $1,953,300(existing development) Estimated Population : 13 persons Current Uses Residential : 5 single family detached units Commercial . Industrial : Public . Comprehensive Plan : Residential Rural (prezoned R-1) Designation Future Uses: : Detached single-family residential units Future Po ulation : 48 ersons 19 housin units . ,� Reviewing Department/Division: ' � " C/�'' 1. Does this annexotion represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? Q��'�/ ��'S /G� � � 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service �G�� L%L�?/I G�,�e �`z"�..�/C�Y� ��C,.�i�`��S �� (Over) . s ✓:ew . provision to the area? 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? 1 4. Can you provide a rough dollar figure estimate of the cost to provide service to this area at current development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, such as new parks, the City would incur as a result of this nnexation? 1� �:.��'� ��c�-��% �c�a� di' c�=� ' 7L� ��- �� 222��---� �;� � ,�j �� iSrf7l'YJ C'd�� ''�/ ��Gaa.��C /(�Yl'C.��'7�C'OS��/Oo,000,�J�C� � /�1'?G��'�I?C y�I�'�G� C G1S�� G /(,� U 5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) �fC� General recommendation and comments: ��C d�'�'1l�r�c�G)'r��'x�'7LiC�j Signature: y � �� Date: � � � O � � � o * o � � o � Q � � � �� ° a � 0 � � ��.x,;? . , . � � �`�� . .� .. .. _ ,. �„ .W. _ , .,, . . _ . _ _ -"s',. ' ., . ' � ..� � �tk,', ' ':F . , ��I� � � �. � � i � � � `�„ � �� j . . , � ' .. �u � y�y;'er . , � � . ' - . �� ' . " � ' _ _ _ _ . . " . ' -: .� ' t� � O _! � � ❑ �� , � \ / Thb documant fa a qr��rprwntotbn,rrot guamteW V !o aurvey xwroey.F� ior city p�rposes aMy and Dosad an tha Dnt infomwNon awioaa as of the tlota ahown. Thb mop is for dieplay purposes only. Proposed Merritt Annexation o Zoo 400 Figure 3: Existing Structures Map 1 : 2400 ti1 „{, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning � ExiSting SttUCtufe ♦O; Alex Pietsch,Administrator --- Renton City Limits G.Del Rosario �'NTo'$ 3 November 2003 0 Proposed Annexation Area � � `� . �{-03-003 � . CtTY OF RENTpW �e vi's�c�> NOTICE OF INTENTION TO CO1��IMENCE OCT 2 9 2003 ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS �m,c�R�rs�o�F�c� UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 (Direct Petition Method) (10°90 PETITION— i�YI El�!"r A1`�IVEXATI01� TO: T��,�+' CITY COUNCIL OF SUBNIlTTED BY: ,�i k,� �Y!e r,r%7�f- � THE CITY OF RENTON ADDREss: I S��vS s� �cx�r+� _ : City Hall, c% City C1erk ��+��-. t�.s h 1055 South Grady Way PHONE: 4�s-��7� -`�Y°� . Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are the owners of not less than ten percent (10%) in acreage, according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, of property, which they desire to annex to the City of Renton. � We hereby advise the City Council of the City of Renton that it is our desire to commence annexation proceedings under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 of all or any part of the area described below. � The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. A map (Exhibit 1) and legal description (Exhibit 2) are included as part of this petition. The City Council is requested to set a date not later than sixty days after the filing of this request for a public meeting with the undersigned. � 1. At such meeting,the City Council will decide whether the City will accept,reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation; 2. The City Council will decide whether to require simultaneous adoption of a proposed zoning regulation, such a proposal having been prepared and filed for the area to be annexed as provided for in RCW 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340; and, 3. 1'he City Council will decide whether to require the assumption of existing city indebtedness by the area to be annexed. This page is the first of a group of pages containing identical text material. It is intended by the signers that such multiple pages of the Notice of Intention be presented and considered as one Notice of Intention. It may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of Intention. Page 1 of 2 M � r _. . � . WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is othenvise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilry of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. � (Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the name t�iat appears on record in the title to the real estnte.) kz-►'�- `^- 14408 sE iooT� sr Q3�3��q �4--`i3 � 1. � M��u.e.� Y►'1 irrt err�' t�6ts,ra w W�ks 1{ q�(J59 2. t0-/� n ��o�� 1�3rd iJ�.S.� - 03 n P H nd+`cu�s �en�0tr1�WA `7�O J7 Q3�.3t�5�?�73 �S�S3 a.c. ' �'$'Z tf /!f 3 p� t�'L S�F• 3. �%y�� e�-�o.� wq, yBos`'� 3��4�5'9 0/9 a��.�'"�� , i " �r �- s�?a � . �c�-��- .E��`�' �� q 33 I�f3 A-�� sE � 4. G � (�a�e r�- E. $1 a�en l�P,rn� �� 9�S�J d 3�.30�qo7�f 7 �� 7 i0-1�' C��rzi, ��Nr��C�u�) q53p �y3��a ��. s� 5. �..k,... t.vA cigvS� 3yZ�-It�59o� b c�. �3 �Rr. o'a ��,�.�. 6. 7. 8. 9. io. �'T.� Zv.S�t=�.r�. Page 2 of 2 H:\DIVISION.S\P&TS\PLANNING\ANNEX�10%Notice of Intent.doc\OD �' �� - � S � ' w c� > Q w � � � � ay � � � � � _�'� � M ,.; ��%� � °Y �alle.Y R 9s �� ,x z ,�� d � n�, � �, t � �j °n„ :s. �« � z�� ,� , O � �� ° � . ,` :,: :, �; . � . . . , , �k �'� �`',. ,fi3l✓.�r'6 ''.;'�: „�;�� fh ,... ��r . n u,,. ,� � Y 6 �%A �,��, ' • ' . ,�.�, ••: 4 ��'.; ; .. ... A fi�" g� s ,� G„ js'�;.: :s, n ��-3;'�,� " '= .r, ,., , , ' ' , , , , , - '�" , <,i� "?.,' a . . � ,�- , , ,., ,.. , • '� . ... . „ -„ �`, � ',C,:�,. , . , ,. ; , . , , ,- �. , ,,. '; , ' , ' � , , . ) �,;�; �,:� �,:,, a,..i-< .;�:, _ . . . �� / � � �U , , , ; , ' , „ � Y_ x h" k,',, � N'9 , k �S �k �r ,i.' . , � ,,,� , .: v ,,, . .n k�z''i� y , , .Ps'.�P� `,YY; ,; ,,� �. E . �:. � �� , _ � �;�--Y:,�:, . �:t } ��:��,F: � � � t St �� jt r , v/ � � ��y, ., � �„ , <yi""` � � ,[.{� „ x �'!'is:iV�'�i ��, '� *e:: '` xn,�, �, ' , : � � £ µ; :� . �.:r.�,,>.�x?�rx..� „ ,, ?.�„.: a�,,`,fi� , �'�� r�" � P,z S�r �:,. - � s; � °� 's, z';Y�'�?:,�'"'�,« . �� ::€ ;,,., �! i - v��:�`� 4 _ , 3 � ,�. � � E10nd �' � d `�� / / %� ,'� ', / � , f \ 2 d , � � , �, �� ,i `— SE 1 � t< w \ iy � — c� �, Q� \ ' C/� z' � � � � Thia document is o grophic rcpresentation,not guaronteetl lo aurwy occurocy, ntended(or city purposea only ond � basad on the beat i fpmotion awiloble oa of the dote ahown. � This mop is for disploy purposes only. Merritt II Annexation o 600 1200 Phasing Map 1 : 7200 GtiaY o�, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning ___ Corporate Limits 4 �� Alex Pietsch,Administrator "`�� G.Del Rosario 0 Original Annexation Area �'�Nzo� iz nPri�2oos � Expanded Annexation Area , /� . CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4 7:�� AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ESTABLISHING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES TO BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF RENTON TO RESIDENTIAL 1 DU/AC (R-1) AND RESIDENT7AL 5 DU/AC (R-5) (MAY VALLEY PREZONE-PHASE II; FILE NO. LUA 98-009, ECF). WHEREAS, under Chapter 31 (Zoning Code), of Title IV (Building Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton," as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has not been zoned in the City of Renton; and WHEREAS, said property owners petitioned the City of Renton for assignment of zoning classifications prior to annexation, and the City Council having held two public hearings to consider this prezoning application, the first hearing being held on January 29, 1997, and the second hearing being held on April 14, 1997, and said zoning request being in confornuty with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORD�IIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton shall bear the following zoning designations once annexed to the City of Renton: Residential 1 DU/AC (R-1) and Residential 5 DU/AC (R-5), as hereinbelow specified, the Development Services Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See E�ibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. 1 _ , � ORDINANCE NO. 4 7 3 2 (Said property, approximately 126 acres of unincorporated King County, is located between the corporate boundaries of Newcastle and Renton, east of Coal Creek Parkway) SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COLJNCIL this 13thday of Julv , 1998. o� Brenda Frit�svold, Deputy City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 13thday of Julv , 1998. o'�++.,�,v✓ Jes anner, Mayor Approved as rm: Lawrence J. Warren, Cit ttorney DateofPublication: July 17, 1998 (Summary) ORD.723:6/03/98:as. 2 MAY VALLEY PREZONE - PHASE II � Attachment A Zonin Desi nations . . ; �_.� .. ; � . .._.._._....________. :: ; s . , , . _r-___ � , � _.. . . i ! �:-:_-�::___:_._-:_�-'� ; r . r_.___._.._---..._. ; � ! ; -'--'-'---- �. :..__....__.-._...---._..,� ' : i i '---._._.._.__. . .._.._.-- ---._......_. � -.._.,__._._._....__...__._. : : ._..�__...__---- ........_... ..._._..._..__.._._.__..__.._. . , ...._.__._......._._.._�_..____ . i _'`.-� � ` ' : .._.._.._........._._. ._ : : ............ .... .._.._...._'__""...._. ' . � _"_��._.._ ; ; ; ; i � : :..._.__...._'__'......__._�...._"- . . ; L ---------- � � - - `1 _ i Q�.,• E _� ; ,�E Ma , U ` ` '. � ;, , �� :; . ..` Y :�a/�e y Rd � ___ �_� �- -- ----- , ; � � . � ; : ; � 0 ----i�.`� �' i I ; i U � . ` � ' jI.__._f�____-- � ; , , , , . , , , � ..____._._.....__. ; ` + _--E.. �.... i , ; ....,.., _'.- ------_ i ; � ; ; i --__._...��. -,--___-�_.`.�._._..___ ` �_.1 ....._,.� � _...._......_...__...----- ` ; ' j t � --_--__--------- --=_z.__._- : i � t-'`--------- --- -- � � � Q� - -----�-------. ; �R—1 ; ; > -----;-- (Area A) � ; ; : _.___._._ , ; ; _..__ �-- ._: __._--- ; a`2�:�-h�.�� ------------- . ; � �--- ------ --- � �-- + F --- =-=-L.v._.,-, ._,.;..�.__ - , ' `� �: th Ct � ` r----____ ___. � - �E�-- ; . — t'' ' � ; � . _ R-1 _..._..--- ' ' Area C) � .�.: �� -- ; ; , � ; . , .: .:_-- � : ; , __r..--- ---- ; ; , --- --_ — ------ - ___ _ - ; , - - ; _ . , , - — ° ___R=S� : ° � - ---- _ _ _ _ .. � �,,,L ; _: : . ___-- ; ___._. ,_ ---_..._ 23- _ . -- - _ _ _.._._ ---- : . . ,... (Area ;B� , , . � . ; 1��-- ' . , �3rd � ; � . , . , . . , . . : . . t.. _ - �_ , , : , . , : , : _.._____ . : . ; � . . . . . .' , . . . , ; . . . . ; . . . ;. ---- --� - -�- . . - ___ .,. . , : ; :. .,\;. -,... .. :.., : : . -- -- , . � , . : . __� _ _ — —_. . .�_.. � f � : : -, ---�: - - ---- --- . , _ :. -._. _.. �-2��. ---._:: ., ... ._ .. : . .._ . --- ; . : . . .;, _ > Y� � , . . .. . . . . . , ., .. . ; : ; :_� ; , .� ; ,� � . ..-- � �. � . _____ . _ . , __. _ . ___, , . �� ; t`�� -= -: ; ..::. . ; ____- . - — ._._.._ . .,..:.. -—- . , .. . . �, ��; _ .., � . �.,,; �� _. _ . .. _.:. , ,,.. ...., . .,� ... .: � ' � -- -- . - . � f. . . : �- _ , ; ; . ___ ,. - � -�� . .. .;. . ____ -- , . �_ _ . . � -- - . �._ � . : - ----- . . _.:_ . : . ...; . . _. : . , .�____. . . .-- � ..� �__ --- ____.._. : __ . � E ; , ; : ; , . , ��_. , 2�st: P . . --_--� , : : :.. . . ... I . ; ; - -, �. .�� -- 1._. _ - -; � � . , . . ., . � : . . . ; ��-- ��-�1-��4 - � -- --- ; _ �� -;.--...._ , ;. __. - _., . , _ ; , . . . __ . ' _ ��- , � � _ -- ---. - ..;, ;... � � -- --- _._...--- � ; : � - -- - � - . -- --- : � . , � : ; �- �� _ � _ .. ; �,� _ �. � �. �, . . . � �� t t�i-. ----- =-__-_ ----==:__ �f�-- - ;- _�--- - _.._..._. . _ � � `� :t _�..: , , : . �= _ � _. . ; : ;, �: _ , ' r , : ,.__. : . _:— ; -----------; , -- --- -- �;, ; r' �- j ; � ; i � -- _.-�-� - '- �---* i - -- - : , �� ---'•_,;,...:-.i_.i._"' --- ' - -,_ -- : , y .� � , w ; , _ ___,__� . , , '';....` C� � _ ----._____�._.-.___._---...._.._-.- - -'-- ---'--- . , , ' '.-- � - �_...----�-�.. , � �` _�_____ SE �-04t --� --�,_ ; �� :` _� ' ,. ; . . _ .___Y � --- i ..; � � , .• ___''. ----__ , � : , . , �•,. ; ,�•tY � Zone Boundaries G ,,�, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning + � * ED/N/SP --- Renton City Limits `` O. Dennison, R. MacOnie ��N•TO� 29 May 1998 � 6�� 1 ,2�� 1 :'7,200 p�.� �}�3 `L. i ATTACHMENT A MAY VALLEY PREZONE-PHASE II PARCEL A--R-1 ZOI�TING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of Government Lot 1 of Section 3,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,King County,Washington, lying westerly of Stonegate, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 177,Pages 62 through 68, inclusive,Records of King County,Washington; TOGETHER WITH all of Government Lot 2 of Section 3,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M., King County,Washington; and TOGETHER WITH that portion of Government Lot 3 of Section 3,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,King County,Washington,lying northeasterly of the County Road(New Castle Road, Duvall Ave.NE, 138th Ave SE,Renton-Newcastle Rd.Rev.),LESS the southerly 135 feet thereof, as measured along the east line of said Government Lot 3; and TOGETHER WITH that portion of the South half(1/2)of Section 34,Township 24 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,King County,Washington, lying southerly of SE May Valley Road(SE Coalfield Way, Thos.Rowse Rd,May Creek Rd.)and easterly of Coal Creek Parkway SE(Newcastle Rd. Rev., 136th Ave. SE). UTS SERVER�SYS2ICOMMOMDIVISION.S�P-TS�PLANNINGWNNEX�PREZONE�PH2LGLZN.DOC MAY VALLEY PREZONE-PHASE II PARCEL B--R-5 ZONING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Those portions of Govemment Lot 3,the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter and the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 3,Township 23 North,Range 5 East, W.M.,King County, Washington,more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of the plat of Newcastle Terrace, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 87 of Plats, Page 30, Records of King County, Washington, said northeast corner also being the northeast corner of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said section; T'hence southerly along the easterly line of said subdivision and along the easterly line of said plat, to the southeast corner of said plat, said southeast corner also being a point on the south line of the North half(1/2)of the North half(1/2)of said Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter; Thence westerly along the southerly line of said subdivision and said plat, said southerly line also following the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 3972,and continuing westerly along the southerly line of the North half(1/2)of the North half(1/2)of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said section and said City Limits of Renton,to an intersection with the easterly right-of-way margin of the County Road(New Castle Road,Duvall Ave.NE, 138th Ave. SE); Thence northerly along said easterly right-of-way margin, to an intersection with a line 135 feet northerly of the south line of Government Lot 3 of said section, said 135 feet being measured along the east line of said subdivision; Thence easterly along said line,to an intersection with the east line of said subdivision; T'hence southerly along said east line, a distance of 135 feet, to the southeast corner of said subdivision, said southeast corner also being the northwest corner of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said section, and said southeast corner also being a point on the north line of said Newcastle Terrace plat; Thence easterly along the north line of said plat and said Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter, to the northeast corner of said plat and said subdivision,and the point of beginning. MAY VALLEY PREZONE-PHASE II PARCEL C--R-1 ZOTTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of the East three quarters (3/4) of Government Lot 3 of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range S East,W.11�.,King County,Washington, lying Southwesterly of the County Road(New Castle Road, 138th Ave SE,Duvall Ave.NE, Coal Creek Parkway SE). \\TS_S ERV ER�SYS2\COMMON�UI V IS ION.S�P-TS�PLANNINGWNNEX�PREZONE�PH2 LG LZN.DOC ,Don:.,id Erickson - Re: Fwd: Re: Bob Blayden "Barn" � `Pa e 1 � :..� .� � ._ , ' ��kn,' � From: Alexander Pietsch To: J covington@ci.renton.wa.us,Gzim merman@ci.renton.wa.us,Nwatts@ci.renton.wa.us,Ijw arren@seanet.com Date: 11/25/2004 2:10:24 PM Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Bob Blayden "Barn" we're working with him and his land use consultant, Jim Hanson. Alex Pietsch Administrator Dept. of Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning City of Renton 425.430.6592 voice 425.430.7300 fax www.rentonmarket.com www.ci.renton.wa.us »> Jay Covington 11/25/04 1:29 AM »> Alex, you or your staff need to contact Bob to understand better what he's proposing. I think the City Council hopes we can figure out a way to bring them into the City, probably with an agreement similar to the one Larry is suggesting. There would need to be strong "incentives"for Bob to meet agreed timelines. While I'd love it if the County would actually do theirjob, I don't think the County has the interest or incentive to bring him into compliance. Their interest is to encourage annexations, and get these areas out of their responsibility. Jay »> Donald Erickson 11/19/2004 11:30:15 AM »> I don't know about the fines but in a meeting last month at DDES they said it would cost approximately $10,000 to do a conditional use for a residential industrial use, which, with some modifications to the barn/storage building, could make it legal in the County before it was annexed into the City. They said their process takes 3-4 months. We told them that if they started then it could potentially dovetail with the annexation since the BRB will take some time as will our deciding whether to accept the enlarged area that the BRB is now looking at, and the preparation of necessary ordinances. I believe Jim Hanson, their consultant, advised the Blaydens against doing this. »>Alexander Pietsch 11/18/2004 2:20:11 PM »> This still doesn't make him conform to our zoning. You can't have a commercial operation in the R-1. He is operating illegally in King County. His barn was never permitted. He needs to pay$10k in fines to the County to get legal. If he isn't willing to do that, I think we should just offer him a temporary use permit which would give him 2 years to move his operation. »> "Larry Warren" <Ijwarren@seanet.com> 11/18/2004 2:20:52 PM »> That's pretty much what we did with Seaport Dozing, a couple of years ago. Do we want some consequences attached to the agreement if he doesn't move on time? Or, just a statement that the city can(or will) begin enforcement? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jay Covington" <Jcovington@ci.renton.wa.us> To: "Alexander Pietsch" <Apietsch@ci.renton.wa.us>; "Gregg Zimmerman" <Gzimmerman@ci.renton.wa.us>; <fjwarren@seanet.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 1:28 PM Subject: Bob Blayden "Barn" ----- -----_._ ..._ _ __�. . - -----__�___........ . --- ---:��___� .Donald Erickson - Re: Fwd: Re: Bob Biayden "Barn" �� Page 2 a ,,[ _._._.._.......�._._.�_ ___. �..._._._._.�. . . , �"' . _ Bob Blayden called me the other day to offer a possible compromise to the situation he and we now find ourselves in. You'il recail that the Blaydens are part of an area working through the annexation process, and King County has suddenly notified them that the outbuilding (bob says the County told him years ago to classify it a a barn) they are currently using as an office is not a permitted use. So we find ourseives in a "Tydico"-like situation, with an illegal use that we don't want and can't grandfather in to our zone upon annexation. Here's Bob's offer: He will agree to move his business from the building and designate it as one of the lots, which should bring it into compliance. What he needs in return is for us to allow him to continue to use it for a designated period of time (which we could negotiate with him, but he'll ask for enough time to find another business location and enough time to get sewer to the building.) Let me know if you think there is the possibility of a deal here. CC: rlind@ci.renton.wa.us,derickson@ci.renton.wa.us �� ;; ,s CITY OF RENTON ..�, Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler November 10,2004 Larry Phillips,Chair Metropolitan King County Council 516 Third Avenue,Room 1200 Seattle, WA 98104-3272 SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON'S MERRITT II PROPOSED ANNEXA��ON Dear Councilmember Phillips: Thank you for your interest in the proposed Merritt II Annexation and for your comments about the important issue concerning protection of the urban separator in the May Valley area. I would like to reassure you that Renton elected officials and staff are aware of the status of the May Valley urban separator. It is our policy to put in place appropriate zoning,consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies, upon annexation of portions of the area. The Renton City Council already took the following actions supporting that position. • Revised Renton's Comprehensive Plan, as part of the 2004 GMA update,to strengthen urban separator policies, including specific policies guiding aevelopment in urban separators. • Designated the May Valley "Residential Low Density"which is comparable to King County's"Greenbelt Urban Separator"classification. • Pre-zoned approximately 133 acres of the Potential Annexation Area south of May Valley Road,to the R-1 zone in 1998. The maximum density allowed in this zone is one single-family detached dwelling per net acre. This is slightly less than the County's R-1 zoning on the Merritt II annexation site which allows one dwelling per gross acre. • Adopted the May Creek Basin Action Plan in February 1998 to address environmental and surface water management issues in the May Valley corridor and require use of the 1998 King County Surface Water Manual for review of development. • Adopted development standards that exclude designated critical areas from density credits and encourage cIustering of actual developed area away from steep slopes, wetlands,and floodplains. The Renton system does not allow transfer of density from these areas to other portions of the site. While this system does not mandate clustering, it does encourage both cluster development and creation of Native Growth Protection easement(open space)tracts on the preserved critical areas. _ In the case of May Valley,many parcels are constrained by the floodplain as well as wetlands, slopes, and soil conditions. The preliminary sketches for plats submitted to us for evaluation prior to annexation include cluster designs. Nevertheless, due to the importance of this issue,we are currently re-evaluating our clustering provisions for the R-1 zone. The Council Planning and Development Committee is now reviewing a proposal to make Renton's regulations more consistent with the mandatory cluster provisions in the King County code. A public hearing before the Renton City Council is scheduled on this issue on December 6,2004. We anticipate adoption on December 13, 2004. �----- 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055-(425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 R E N T O N �This paper contains 50%recyded matenai,30%post consumer A H E A D O F T H E C U R V E November 10,2004 Page 2 In conclusion,these revised clustering provisions should be in place before the Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County reconvenes on December 15,2004,to further consider the proposed Merritt II Annexation and possible expansion of the annexation to the larger area. The City of Renton has every intention of working with property owners in the area to insure the integrity of the May Valley urban separator. If you have any further questions on the cluster zoning proposal or Renton's position on this annexation,please contact Alex Pietsch, Administrator of the Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning _ Department, ar his staff inember, Rebecca Lind at 425-430-6588. � �.�� Sincerely, � ��'� , � Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 04-155/AP/KK W:mp Attachment: Proposed R-1 Cluster Code Language cc: Jay Covington James Benton Dwight Pelz Rob McKenna Alex Pietsch Lenora Blauman Kurt Triplett Rick Bautista �✓Rebecca Lind Don Erickson , � ., ., � � .i .,�. � Merritt II Annexation Boundary Review Board Hearing November 3, 2004 B ackground • Renton received 50/50 Direct Petition February 6, 2004 • Signatures representing a majority of area's 20.59 acres certified by King Courity on February 19, 2004 • Signatures representing majority of registered voters in area was certified by County on March 26, 2004 • King County zoning is R-1 (1 du/ oss acre) • Most of 133-acre unincorporated area, including annexation site, was prezoned by City to R-1 in 1997 • Renton City Council accepted 50/50 Direct Petition to Annex on Apri13, 2004 Existing Conditions • Location — east of 142th Ave SE if extended and west of Lyons Ave NE (Stonegate) — south of SE May Valley Road. • Size - 20.59-acres (expanded from 4.8 acres) • Uses - 5 existing single-family detached dwellings • Boundaries - site abuts Renton on portions of its southern and eastern boundaries � I � � • � � � ____ " , , � __ . , , _�i . . _``--_-_ ____ , ,� _ , . , �.__.. . � _ 1 . __. -- i� _r--�. __�._� + + ` < �� ` —-_—. �_� � � �, �1 4 L1� � . l -�` � � �` t_Th ' � .� rl�" � ,r ' ...l�-� ' I y,1, r` " . �,T---?. �.'%T� �^ � ' �_ [�"' .... ,�'"{*��`i'\r� �!� � :� '� �� yic?s"�;'� 1�� I tCT —� '� r`(.��L/�J :;,;��? �t. '�� -�jY "_��---� .�--' � i�I �=� ��4?,. � �-- - +��+�=7 �:�� ` � � ��: � � t,� _. ,� � Y� ��, � = � �- =�� _��. �--� K ��tir, �,`�, � . � _ �. .� �� 1 Y � � � '-� - y. �� -r � --�'_ _ '' �{ � �� . � % � � _,�� '�� .�I _ � _� ';' i ,`i7 i - _ � • � � SE I�fay Valley Rd * . .�' : � -�► _ . s .. �.__ (�'.J � 47 �,� � • � � � ` r CS SE I OOth�Place � � - �: �o'� ' ' ' � � ` � v 3 T� " Lt ' �w�;� 9 r� �' r � � �i '�'k'?5. a " � l:- �<.�`� �. •�-'� �1 �� r t'h ti.4, �!� �`�� 17� r� �. <� ,, k,�` s�.r ty � � ,,� , ,.�" �� t �x , %��K� �;#� ,�+; v� ,"�a �`"� '�. � � � �� . �� : �'- �;� ` q,,,��.„��, >.�►E�!, �h-4� .�'r� �� •��'1�� ,�, .t'�"",r��t��k��1f "�� . x��h �. .F� �. ��.� y' i � � �� + '��. '... ��, + '_._R � ..-� } .. -. j� .,}�,.. t-_� y p � �. ��` y� ' 3 �1 �1 � �' ♦ �� _ �y� .�� at 'i ., ; '"r�' �fi�� i, � ,> ' ��L��r�T #r!� � P�, � Z,� 4 e. . ' �` .� �,r`� � � �s. � .r;.; -�••E! � '�.: , � . Y i k+ - f"{ . .. �� ` �N � �� • • �� ; . � �%,.,.:1 II : :.yn• � . � i� .� ��.. f �� 2 p` � i ..y� �r� �A.� 'Yr� �:.. �i% E r �`'"' A�.�_..-: w"� �;�� ".•, � � '�� YhJ�� j3¢ r�.'Yi.�a. ; µ�.t � 'i'�,eys�r,t"'f�{�`` �< �►+"''+�P `T� ��.:" !�f - `� *'�-� . �"� �` _ �,.i I��> ,� � .�. • i . � .�.'�;..: <;�rrt . , . � � .r �:.... �-" '+""� "°' ..� ::,�w,�—. I — "��'. _''� �` ;�, ��. . ,� ..,'.A ��c� :::. �� ,r'�s�� ;w '"r� -� � ,;.� _ � `�v; - �� . �� 11 �-� � ��- 4 Existing Conditions -Topography . , Toqographv- average slope of 10%to north. Some steep slopes of 40%along ridge line 11 ' . Figurc 5- Topography Existing Conditions - Public Services • Utilities — Within District#90, Coal Creek Utility �� District, and Renton Water Service areas • Fire r-; x... — Within both District 10 - & District 25 ■ 0..��" �.` , 0.� ' • Schools � �"�� _ •t ��' �" Spli between Renton � �� _,,,�� and Issaquah School � Districts Existing Conditions - Public Services � � � I� � . � � , � � Water Utility Districts FiQure 6-W'atcr Districts Man Existing Land Use Designation and Current Zoning :�m� �� -;r�.,� � �� K.C. Land Use Map -Urban ,i� _ L'!1 . ' . � �$�' � Residential - 1 du/ac � `��`= � ____�,,, .,,, T�flA :` K.C. Zonin� - R-1 - _, -,' ! '° � Residential 1 du/g oss ac �--� � �. ,. .-. �.i ., � :.I� '"� _�� a �� ' �'Si � �� Figure 7-County Zoning Map Existing Land Use Designation and Proposed Zoning � Renton Comp Plan Land Use Map - Residential � ' Low Density _� ; ", , fl�1: •-'. - ' = . ��„/ ;� ~ : Renton Prezonin� area �; " .=� - prezoned R-1 (1 du/net ■ 'r ,ri �� acre) in 1997 e'°� . ` � � ; � � � I�`: Figure 8-Renton Zoning Map Fiscal Impact Analysis • General Fund cost and revenue implications — Assumes potential of+ 17 single-family detached homes at full development — Assumes a new home value of$400,000 — Assumes 5 dwellings currently on site Fiscal Impact Analysis Current Dev Full Dev Revenues: $8,225 $28,335 Costs: $7,024 $26,127 Surplus/<Deficit> $1,201 $2,208 One-time expenses:Parks acquisition and development @$10,866 Relevant Boundary Review Board Obj ectives • Preservation of natural No change neighborhoods and communities • Use of physical boundaries, Uses City and parcel boundaries including but not limited to bodies of water,highways, and land contours • Creation and preservation School district does not change and of logical service areas service areas previously agreed to • Prevention of abnormally Boundaries interim pending future irregular boundaries annezations to UGA boundary • Incorporation as cities or , Annexation consistent with criteria towns or annezation to cities or towns i Conclusion Merritt II Annexation in best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton - Furthers City Business Goals — Generally consistent with City policies for annexation — Consistent with City policies for low density single- family rezones such as R-1 — Generally consistent with Boundary Review Board criteria — Minor revenue surplus at fall development — Except for parks,no major service deficiencies identified Expanded Merritt II Annexation Boundary Review Board Hearing November 3, 2004 Potential Expansion of Boundaries • Expanded area as proposed by King County would be approximately 133-acres • Area is currently truncated by a number of different service providers including: . • Fire District#10 • Fire District#25 • Coal Creek Utility District • Water District#90 • Renton Water& Sewer Utility • Expansion of boundaries to include 133-acre island between City of Renton boundaries to the south, west, and east north to SE May Valley Rd would presumably result in more efficient deliyery of urban services under one jurisdiction i T.�j t.Jfq' rll,r �rr r � � �" ¢a �� >.+�a�, � ;r.��l� � °� �` �u ' _ , �Il�.. . r �. . � I � �� y�C`.^'�.�^'��, l�" r' � � ' � ti - . �� ■►s:, ��:w�.'7.rf.��r.f�r�i If��:[+�' � ' aii�� Ul�iill! rra ' � ' � _+ �� ' � � 1 1 �• �,' � ��'7� €=1 r ■t `'�� +NJ��v� �1�arii al • ��' Ii �� ce� �� i� ��<�R �l � '♦ �� I/tn:'� �.ti r. � ,� S�� iq La1 !/w 1 ♦ ��/.■ _n� �� F.; '�Qf`'� ,,�r �.F:I:1T7� :-f �7 . � � � ��.f'�� ,� , . . .:a •r �l'rr.`J 4 l�f+l■Cl lla■�r- I • � n��I�i.'1Ca�a.�.Si.��m i ■:: r`-` !' �i. a�y��i'��7 �..� _ •�` �� ■ � ��i�� :�'�q� e ■ — �—�. �1�a1 f►Z}y� f fT:l!r�'1 � �. ►��i►'� 1 ��qr.Slla!�!�1 17IL1 r � ■�'■ �al _ i n. ■ny �■� • .w,.a !:S. �+ � `�Fl7flf•is; :5�71,f.�• ��.�3i� L��1� Cll�l WIn7 l\� � `� ` � �i�� I�u�i.v. �� .�� __ `� -�r� t. ,�jy ��r�1 U jfl 1l��`v`%),I�l�`'.a�� •� I • ��. � ��sn p�r�� nS ?,Su -;. ��=+n/:��'� � qS� �'=«f i,��f �v��'7 1.'�"��:s'�� "i��.,'� t►�rr�ip��►w .." ifl �'r►�',f� +t�� rwrL 1�. R7 r � �� . I �,�'�i�0�^� � �s3 ��qanl L�' -�. _ 1 �� rl L,»r� �i.�N LI i1� `_� � ��,, _r, � - ��spP �I� � ��I.�� sI t l� q:�tl LrJ,911 L?: �i ■ ��`��fSi::n�..u�i�� ' � �� 1� ��'f�►'��iy l�Rn �t:, �J � *A!+ ��p� ui�n�f��i.A��7 � �r� � ' � , la)i`2a1 f� rr +ic: �L�ni,aF�as�as.,,,.rs��i c �0 �F•• �. -'�_��!'7f[ r lu1 L' �i � � {/ �; �!l�ran o u� I., � � - �^ � Ii�Lti !a� ��► � I'I��'�►...•:; "�, �m_�=r��:�:s. .i:. ' � '�� 7 � �r'� S�/ r. �Q�.:i 0�'iC�R+- n � II��a..��i:..s.F� �� + � � Q��i�F�A.. �1� �n j� �� li� n`l�.j:�:.. . � ' �i ' i.V�:.'(].��' �(1 �� rr�AC��`d �� I�C:i�'w""yi'•�`_ n �� -��'i.��in�d:^��ii:l- •�� —'* � , �C�L.,1. "! i �.�,�,.�_.�: ■'�� r�� ri..• �a a,,s r�l nt,e � u�:- ��l. \��q J� f1 ��nus`��1,��a f1�la�w 1-�a�G7 r�sc7 HI` t� ��,`��:�,�•�=��7:_ ' j��R; ��`I�a1�J��)Y"� �f � � 4LFns;, ��+��NP+�� dih i_�r,',�-_.. � r� `=„" l•�_1 r� 11L � le�ei.�i� 1 1 \ � <� i�� II,r,..��i, ��\� ��j 61�. wr'7I�1 S � f' ■ �.. •:� f1�;°i��:. ��1•� �e�Ul��. � l��II{T� q!/� �� C�''F!��,�UI al��1 lll� �+``• � '1 ��,�-%%:��J i� ��111111�%! -- \�, ��'J�uii] V�ii i�l�� + F� �� I�\T��: �, ra�l�"�� 'rr-.��u'`�` '�� yr u rt au�� h'��'•!+'r w rrE�, R,►�ip��i:�� L' � �\ �j�,-��w re. ♦ •/ • �i ��.:� 14��' �� :;a�`,Vi�i� �� _ '��i� ,,:� �l�l�� t�1� � 1��!� �iy�f �t" ■i 1■ �it '� I . �� ,w� � � 1 �1� � J\\\\�� 11 ��YC iQY� �� . � •"�5a:�a��t- �� , J � _ Ci�Ir�OYlr�v�- � 1 ..' ' �\I��0�1� ��'.,!, I.\J �� 7�._ '`� �i ii� �`. ! �� . �1 � ��a',`•n�ia �� /y �., ,��-ie�P�,,: �1R►.r'� �_ l� t.c . d f �� '::: iii;�{;�''- ., a�C:� e�v�! . 4��"�r•,C�`�"`,0 � eE �/��.r� ,.� -��: �`;� �: � � ..� 4�, �� ., ��;,s:�� f. � . �' T� ■ ~� - :..�1rL'.:. �D�� i ~�, -'�.''1 - ■ `•' � 7E�0�o►7 ' � � � , _ ■ ��, � ��•� �o�ecso �1� -� � �!��l��'i`�� ►-��°��- -1`�� ►�i � , J� �� L�� . •'• , w ,�.��....,��z . ,, � . �._:�� -��r � . �,�� ,, � � ,, ��_��;�� ... -..�.�. . �� . �a�`� ,__. / 1 �I�:�'�� : • ♦►�. - . R�r � - ��- zt�� ►1. �r��,� '` � �/-��;,��' ��■ i�w�_ �� ,�. �� ` � ■ l�SIl11� ■�IIL��lll� � �� ,�� a%�A's/�� ■ ►!$'J�IL��IIii: �■....■■ ��r��,�� ,l"�..,..,_1-�' ��',;, 1� � ��i�a ��111�LC'L'�� \��1i�G�f��X"�� ' �' ' - �..�ir i��r�� r�r�r��,�I� �,� �� .'•`��`�ctu�vv� .'.��►.,��.r��i•`► •� . ■■ ♦♦ �► � �� ►�' . �► I�� ji ■ARi��w �►� �1+�,►, ��r ��i�,,�,tl a� - �� :p n�11LIGtE[��•'� �raD�E�!i : �ir�� r ��• ' � ■■ ��a'�i �i RR�lI�A�' ::'�ii��,t /�1. �,�� R� � a � r �. A � *ii rir�w.�n..�...�.. _ f� y'l�t�f�l/�/�� r� �� !►_� �� _ .^1 ; �� • � • � 1 � �� ,� . � r � �. . 1 ..,,, �� .1� ■ ��a. � ■ n��. � � y�`�� i� Wr'f ��i /�w ��ti� � w � i'` ��• ��l�J/!!1� �I�3'JYIi:Ll�illill� 1�/ � � � � .� •� ,+� ��W�L•�i�■ :`� 1Ly��iy�1�j��f� �� ♦�� vll�/�.fi�l1� I■.��r��.��n�tr►�' .i�'i�r�{� �� ♦ •i��f�t�e'�u�r �. ��..,,.��v�►�i•:� �� e �,�. � �� .—►► .� �.. i�.�/�� w � �� R��l�w �� I��I� I��..., v - �/ ►1��".r" �,r,1►LICtEt�� nra��1!!i:�'��i�i *� ��s�" � - �� a�1 .� �� -� Yll��a��s t\\ �/H►�.�, '�i� ■ � i�r,�".,,r ��11�� i��i� �3/�!1t�11 � yi a■ � 11 a� �.LLlIIJy(�� Ifllil��t►� �' �Af�� L=� ��I�R� r, .w�� 1�{�I,,ry A�� t'!"ill;7�_ �. Compliance with Relevant Countywide Planning Policies • Policy CA-7. Adjacent King County and Renton have jurisdictions shall identify and worked together to protect what protect habitat networks that are js the expanded Merritt II aligned at jurisdictional annexation area as an urban boundaries separator and continuous low density open space habitat for wildlife • Policy CA-10. Jurisdictions Renton has adopted the May shall maintain or enhance water Creek Basin Action Plan which quality through control of recommends solving problems at runoff and best management their source when feasible and practices to maintain natural suggests land use prescriptions aquatic communities and beneficial uses Compliance with Relevant Countywide Planning Policies • Policy LU-27. Urban separators The arpa�et�Merritt�'I shall be defined as permanent annexation site�is primarily low-density lands, which protect designated Greenbelt.Urban adjacent resource lands, Rural Separator on the County s Land Areas, and environmentally Use Map and Residential Low sensitive areas and create open Density on Renton's Land Use space conidors within and Map. In 1997 Renton prezoned between Urban Areas this area R-1, 1 du/net acre • Policy LU-31. Each City shall The expanded area is part of ; designate a potential annexation Renton's designated PAA. It area. Each potential annexation does not averlap that of arry '� area shall be specific to each city adjacent jurisdiction at this tiine 1 and such areas shall not overlap ` � Compliance with Relevant Countywide Planning Policies • Policy LU-32. A city may The expanded Merritt II annex territory only within its annexation area is located within designated�otential annexation Renton's PAA and the City is area. All crties shall phase prepazed to provide a full range of annexations to coincide with the urban services including police, ability to coordinate the full fire,water(portion), sewer provision a full range of urban (portion)and surface water services to areas annexed management • Policy CC-6. A regional open The proposed expanded Merritt II ' space system shall be established annexation area includes habitat to include lands which: c. lands and drainage features Contain natural areas,habitat including those related to May lands, natural drainage features, Creek which flows across the and/or other environmental, northern third of the area from east cultural, and scenic resources. to west Compliance with BRB Objectives ; • Preservation of natural • Does not divide eacisting neighborhoods and neighborhoods communities • Use of physical boundaries, • Uses major roadways and including bodies of water, city boundaries to define area highways, and land contours • Creation and preservation • Placing area under one of logical service areas municipal jurisdiction for police,fire,parks, and roads should improve service • Prevention of abnormally • Boundaries become regular irregular boundaries filling out this area of Renton's PAA Compliance with BRB Obj ectives • Discouragement of multipte Not applicable incorporations of small cities and encouragement of incorporation of cities in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated urban areas • Dissolution of inactive Not applicable. There are no special purpose districts inactive special purpose districts in expanded area • Adjustment of impractical Not applicable. Either boundaries annexation area has reasonable boundaries Compliance with BRB Obj ectives • Incorporation as cities or Expanded annexation area towns or annexation to is designated "urban"in cities or towns of both the Counry and City unincorporated area which comprehensive plans are urban in character • Protection of agrtcultural Not applicable and rural lands which are designated for long term producNve agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the county legislative authority Conclusion • Either Merritt II, as proposed (20.6 acres), or an expanded Merritt II Annexation area (133 acres) both generally comply with RCW 36.93.180 • Consolidating the existing island of unincorpora.ted land west of Newcastle Road (136th Ave SE) under a single jurisdiction would invariably make coordination between existing districts and municipal government easier. Renton is capable of providing a full array of services, including accessible local government • Both areas comply with County and City Comp Plans which have designated it for low density residential • Both areas were prezoned by Renton in 1997 to R-1, one unit per net acre, reflecting the area's environmental sensitivity and greenbelt status. , I .. ., � � �� .. � CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: October 22,2004 TO: Don Erickson, Senior Planner EDNSP FROM: Robert Arthur,Land Use Compliance Inspec SUBJECT: POSSIBLE CODE CONCERNS IN MERRITT II ANNEXATION Don: The following would be, in my estimation, possible Code violations that would involve investigations and issuance of Notices of Violation to the owners/occupants. They will be broken down into categories. A. SETBACK FROM STREAMS 1. 14431 SE May Valley Road Encroachment into May Creek setback 2. 9524 143`d Pl. SE Stream encroachment 3. 13703 SE May Valley Road Stream encroachment 4. 14408 SE 100`h St. Stream encroachment B. BUSINESS LICENSE(HOME OCCUPATION) 1. 9530 143�Pl. SE Potential home occupation 2. 13815 SE May Valley Rd Potential home occupation 3. 13807 SE May Valley Rd Potential home occupation 4. 9933 143`d Ave. SE Blayden Construction business 5. 14610-14612 SE 99`h Ct. Construction business on Holmes Site. C. DANGEROUS BUILDING 1. 9630 Newcastle Illegal sriucture,Blind intersection 2. 13806 SE 100`h St. Abandoned house and dangerous building � �/ � � � 1C�_ /�7e-��--- f �'�� 2�' ��'� ��!�� X � � �� R�� A � -�,� ,�� /�� , � ��' �� '��' �� / �' - � y,�� ; �l�� . � � �i��%I/ fi��/�r.�l�� '� �i��' �,`r�' /�f� '/6�"��,- lf'nc.� �j��/y�' ,Tr(��1�, �„ , � � ! ; ^ (/ � — � , � / Y , �� , � � :,��: �/�� ,� ' �.�;�:`°��' ��`J - ��. �� . ��,�� , �� , � � � � , � �. D J � � � ��d a�'� . �� ' l � ��'�,� � �� 'r�� , � � Y � � L�� j�2 � � � ,/` /l �* �� -.� � �,�%G�'� ,�/'�1�t� 42 l.�-� . � � , , � �' G - �� 1�� r';�� n ,� C,� .� - � � .�.� , r ,� , � � . �� %� � �, � ��'� ��'l-��; �'/�� ' , �� 7 � � ° � . �� l -�� i��' �� ;f��`�.��- � J'e �'��-`-" / ; �� ' �. .� � � �`; � .�%"✓� �r��'/'✓'�'`�; ��' �,� ,/' ��'� �� / �l�l,�/�""G��✓r��. i � G��r� ��< �� -/J'r , � ,�,� � ��''�2� � ��'/'r� . �� ` �j//�' / l 1 / �� " LY / ' (/„�� ¢ :�� .��.� ��'� 1��s . ,;r�� ,�J ��:�L/�✓/ � � / � ��+ .'I � � � r ,� �,`�" 1�'� ` r � f ` � � �; � �.��/�lyl��'�".��j � r� } o, . �� t � �' �i�� a/�/G�.�C��n i� � - � �� 9 ' � � �/�/ � �� i� � ��'�.�% �� ' � ��'p��',=��,,��> ��2' �� ,r�--�__ > F�obe�,Arthur- RE: FW: 9933 143RD Ave SE � � _ _ Page 1 From: "Breazeal, Jeri" <Jeri.Breazeal@METROKC.GOV> To: 'Robert Arthur' <Rarthur@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 08/12/2004 1:16:14 PM Subject: RE: FW: 9933 143RD Ave SE Thanks, I will be doing a bit more research and then sending them a violation notice. Jeri -----Original Message----- From: Robert Arthur[mailto:Rarthur@ci.renton.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 12:51 PM To: Jeri.Breazeal@METROKC.GOV Subject: Re: FW: 9933 143RD Ave SE Jeri: I have had our long range planners look at this situation and it is uncertain when, or even if, they will come into the City. The operation as you describe would not be allowed in the City. I would suggest that you go ahead with your enforcement procedures and bring them into compliance. Please keep me in the loop. Thanks. Bob »> "Breazeal, Jeri" <Jeri.Breazeal@METROKC.GOV> 08/09/2004 4:17:28 PM »> > -----Original Message----- > From: Breazeal, Jeri > Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 3:40 PM > To: BOB ARTHUR (RARTHUR@CI.RENTON.WA.US) > Subject: 9933 143RD Ave SE > > Bob, I have a case at the above location. They are operating a > construction business. They have converted part of a barn into an office >without permits and have some equipment and outside storage. They have > several employees. Obviously they need a change of use permit. They made > the statement that they will soon be in the city of Renton. They would not > be able to operate under King County guidelines unless they get a > conditional use permit for a home industry and a change of use permit for > the barn. They still my not be able to have outside storage. The home > industry is limited to an equivalent of 50% of the floor area of the house > and 4 employees. > I _ . ___ _-----....._____----._....._.._... ................� ,�� ,._____ -.......-----._._..._._.._.�.._--__________------.......... . . . .....�.._------- -- -- - Rober�Arthur- RE: FW: 9933 143RD Ave SE Page 2 ____.__.�...� _.:._._.�._ ___ _____...��.___._ _�__._._.__._._._..__�_ _._._�....___� � �_.�___.__.�_..____ > To make a long story short, assuming they are going to be annexed in the > next 3 months, would your codes allow such a use?The property is zoned > R-1 and is 6.67 acres. (r-1 has a density of 1 dwelling per acre) I am >willing to wait it out if they would be legal in the city of Renton and > the annexation is soon. > > > Thanks, Jeri This message has been scanned by the City of Renton's filtering gateway. � - Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County Yesler Building,Room 220, 400 Yesler Way, Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: (206) 296-6800 • Fnx: (206) 296-6803 • http://zvwzametrokc.gov/rrttnexations August 30, 2004 ,.�,�_,_�, m,� .� . .� � °��;�:� , 4..w;� : R � eS:��.� .' ._ :1"� , f ! �� N ; � 3 � 2�Q4 � City of Renton ' E-c�'„'�''� - _ -`.`"�'. �� r.t,�:` _ Attn: Don Erickson,AICP, '��`"�"��` �� -�-�-�•-= Senior Planner 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: REQUEST FOR REVIEW File No. 2178—City of Renton—Merritt II Annexation Dear Mr. Erickson: Enclosed is a copy of a request received by the Boundary Review Board for a public hearing on the above-referenced file. The Board is expected to discuss the date for the September 27, 2004 re�ular meeting. If you have any comments to make regarding scheduling of the hearing,please transmit them to this office prior to the meeting. You will be notified of the date and time of the public hearing. Sincerely, Lenora Blauman Executive Secretarv Enclosure: Request for Review, dated August 27, 2004 cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the Metropolitan King County Council Harry Sanders, Records and Elections Division Diane Murdock, King County Department of Assessment Lydia Reynolds-Jones,Manager,Project Support Services Paul Reitenbach, Department of Development and Environmental Services Michael Thomas, King County Office of Regional Policy and Planning FORM HE 1 " ' '� �tECE1VED AUG 2 � 2004 �9C4g ��«i�F�� WAState Boundary Review Rort Sims goard For K'�ng C�• King Counry Executive August 27, 2004 Lenora Blauman, Executive Secretary Washington State Boundary Review Board of King County Yesler Building, Room 220 400 Yesler Way Seattle, WA. 98104 Dear Ms. Blauman: On July 13, 2004 the Office of Management and Budget received from your office the city of Renton's notice of intention to annex property located within the city's East Renton Plateau potential annexation area. Based on a careful and deliberative review by various county departments and agencies, the county believes that there are a number of inherent concerns and issues with the proposal that if left unaddressed would likely result in an annexation which does not further the interests of King County residents, does not meet the spirit of state and county growth management policy, and does not further the objectives of the Boundary Review Board. The 20.6 acre Merritt II annexation proposal is located in an area of urban unincorporated King County that lies between the cities of Renton and Newcastle. The proposed annexation raises a number of significant concerns which include,but are not limited to: 1. The county's continued ability to provide efficient local services in an urban unincorporated area fraught with irregular municipal boundaries and relatively isolated between the cities of Renton and Newcastle; 2. Environmental and surface water management issues associated with the May Valley corridor; 3. The application of appropriate zoning to protect the regionally designated May Valley urban separator; 4. Consistency with adopted plans and policies including the King County Comprehensive Land Use Plan, and the King County Countywide Planning Policies; and 5. Consistency with Boundary Review Board objectives. King Counry is an Equa[Oppnrtunity/Ajfirmative Action Employer � r�1202M and complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act Lenora Blauman ` ' August 27, 2004 Page 2 For these reasons, I respectfully request that the Boundary Review Board invoke its jurisdiction and review the proposed action. I further request that a public hearing date be held in this matter at the board's earliest convenience. A public hearing will provide the county, affected citizens, and the city an opportunity to review and discuss, within the parameters of the Board's decision making process,the proposal in greater detail. Please direct further communications regarding this matter to Mike Thomas, Senior Policy Analyst, Office of Management and Budget, at 206-205-0720. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, / ~ � on Sims King County Executive cc: The Honorable Larry Phillips, Chair,King County Council Kurt Triplett, Chief of Staff,King County Executive Office Steve Call, Director, Office of Management and Budget(OMB) Mike Thomas, Senior Policy Analyst, OMB Kevin Wright, Sr. Prosecuting Attorney, King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office King County Interdepartmental Annexation Group Alex Pietsch, Director,Neighborhoods, Strategic Planning and Economic Development, City of Renton King County Annexation Team Rebecca Lind - Hi Rebecca.doc Page 1 � � i '� i I Hi Re e ca I I b c , Andrew Duffus called regarding status of the R-1 clustering proposal. Explained that this is in this year's work program I I and not forgotten but that the state mandated Comp Plan had taken precedence. Discussed cluster pre-app for the I i Andrews site with him. Also talked about the County possibly invoking jurisdiction to expand the area of the Merritt II I Annexation. He said it is not certain that the County will invoke jurisdiction which means Jim Hanson could come back in � quickly after annexation with his development scheme. Andrew thinks this could trigger a suit by 1000 Friends of I Washington since two larger sites would be left for"estate style"large lot low-density housing. He believes this is also a � violation of the GreenbelUUrban Separator policies. � I I I I� i I I i � i, � i i I i , i I ! � i ' � I � , ( � I I ,I � � I � J == Washington State Boundary Review Board For King Coi�nty Yesler Building, Roorn 402, 400 Yesler Wny, Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: (206) 296-6800 • Fax: (206)296-6803 • http://wwzv.metrokc.gov/nnrtexations September 28, 2004 ��`��,.m9 , �a. k�v� � � �� a � �� : _ � � ..._. .......�._.,,.- ;-l'�'..'.�,'- ;�v tl,r.1G � City of Renton �'" ` `�"`��°��-�� Attn: Don Erickson, AICP Senior Planner 1055 S. G:ady E�Vay Renton, WA 98055 IN RE: NOTICE OF HEARING File No. 2178 - City of Renton - Merritt II Annexation Please see attached Notice concerning date for a public hearing to consider proposed annexation to the above-referenced file. Sincerely Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary Enclosure: Notice of Hearing CC: Address on file label(s) CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Form HE2 �k � - � - Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County Yesler Bitildirtg, Room 402, 400 Yesler Way, Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: (206) 296-6800 • Fnx: (206)296-6803 • http://zUwwmetrokc.gov/rtnnexations November 4, 2004 � m��`^ � '4fr�,§ � ��L',� y a( 6` /� 1. 6 6�i � 0/ I.uVV� �5 Ciry of Renton f Attn: Don Erickson, AICP, � E`�QN°'"'"`".'.`` "° � r�r ;_i_ ,�,��,,; Senior Planner �`_`�n1D�T"::;` . _.•. . . 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 IN RE: NOTICE OF HEARING File No. 2178 - City of Renton - Merritt II Annexation Please see attached Notice concerning new dates for a public hearing to consider a modification to the boundaries of the above-referenced file. Sincerely Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary Enclosure: Notice of Hearing CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Form HE2 � � 4�., �. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF RENTON— MERRITT II ANNEXATION FILE NO. 2178 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY will hold a public hearing at the hour of 7:00 PM on Wednesday, December 15, 2004. The hearing will take place at the Renton Technical College, 3000 NE Fourth Street, Renton WA, Building H, Room 102. The purpose of the hearing is to consider potential boundary modification to add territory to the proposed annexation to the City of Renton of an area known as "Merritt II," all in King County, Washington and more generally described as: West of 148�'Avenue SE; South of an including SE May Valley Road; East of Coal Creek Parkway SE; East of 138"'Avenue SE; North of SE 102"�Street; together with tax parce10323059052. A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS ON FILE AND AVAILABLE AT THE OFFICE OF THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD. The Boundary Review Board conducts all meetings and hearings in locations that are wheelchair accessible. Any person requiring other disability accommodations or special assistance should contact the Boundary Review Board staff at least two business days prior to the meeting. The Boundary Review Board telephone is 206-296-6800. For TTY telephone services, please call 206- 296-1024 Each request for accommodations or assistance will be considered individually according to the type of request, the availability of resources and the fmancial ability of the Board to provide the requested services or equipment. DATED at Seattle, Washington, this 4th day of November 2004. WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary � _ .�,, THE WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARYREVIEW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY SPECIAL MEETING/PUBLIC HEARING 7.•00 PM Wednesday, November 3, 2004 Sierra Heights Elementary School 9901132nd Avenue SE Renton, WA AGENDA L WITNESS SIGN IN-6:30PM �r It is from this list that witnesses are called to testify. IL CALL TO ORDER- 7:OOPM jim Denton, Chair III. ROLL CALL Judy Tessandore, Vice-Chair Ellen Abellera A.J. Culver Van Anderson Ethel Hanis Lloyd Baker Claudia Hirschey Charles Booth Roger Loschen Michael Marchand � AGENDA,November 3,2004 Page Two � IV. FILE NO. 2178- City of Renton-Merritt II Annexation 6:30PM Introduction of Elchibits 7:OOPM Introductory Comments on Hearing Procedures and Swearing in of Witnesses 7:OOPM Proponent: City of Renton(20 minutes) 7:20PM Opponents: King County (20 minutes) 7:40PM General Testimony: Groups are limited to ten minutes and individuals have three minutes to speak Rebuttal: City of Renton(10 minutes) _______�--� V. FILE NO. 2178 - Cifiy of Renton - Merritt II Annexation, Board deliberation and direction to the Staff on Resolution and Hearing Decision i :'� VI. AD OUIZNMENT . '� � ;,'? j ` ' � �� 1�� I ;1 � f � , C%� � - �� t, � , � ,`��J��1 �,,f ��r � f G ' � � � � � � � � ��- ��/�'U'�i,�� 6 �:�� , �� ,�� '� ��.-��` /' J� � � � ' ✓_ _- n � � , � �� r✓G�;' 6 ��z' �, � �°�-',rG�1� �� ,/� � � � '/�> � �r �� /��r�J �L,,�,� ��iJ�'/ �Tyf�j�' //J4 � �' � ,� >�� ,�f� ,�,�,�; ,. �� . ,�f � �� %�'v/C/�✓G' i�i7" .��L�� ! ✓.//' i " � �/�(�' `.� � ��/ /J�/� � � � i e � � �� (�,.�r.� �. � AGENDA,November 3,2004, Cont. � Page Three BACKGROUND STATEMENT The Boundary Review Board The Boundary Review Board was created in 1967 by the legislature in part to"... provide a method of guiding and controlling the growth of municipalities... " (RCW 36.93.010). There are seventeen such boards in the State of Washington. Board members are residents of the County and serve for four-year terms. They are not allowed to hold other local government offices of jobs. Their compensation is $50.00 per day for work on Board business. Members may not properly discuss proposals under their consideration outside of the public hearing (ex parte communications). The Board is a quasi judicial, administrative body empowered to make decisions on such issues as incorporations, annexations, mergers, disincorporations, etc., by cities, towns, and sewer, water and �, fire districts. It can approve, deny, or modify a proposal. Board decisions are fmal unless appealed to the King County Superior Court. With an appeal the Court reviews the file, exhibits, transcript and the board decision, rather than conducting a new hearing. Appearance of Fairness Doctrine In general, decision-makers such as Board members must not only be fair in their actions (i.e., have no conflicts of interest), but must also, to the ordinary citizen, appear to be free of any position or influence which would impair their ability to decide a case fairly. However, the State Supreme Court has held that if a person is of the opinion that a decision-maker is so impaired, that opinion must be stated at the first available opportunity. SUMMARY OF HEARING PROCEDURES Sigr►-in to Speak A roster will be found on the speaker's podium. Those who wish to testify must sign in before witnesses are sworn. All speakers will be called.from this list. If you sign in once, it is not necessary to do so at any continuation of the hearing. � , � AGENDA,November 3,2004 Page Four � Exhibits Please submit exhibits to staff for marking before the Call to Order. The Board must retain all exhibits until a decision is filed and the appeal period ends (ten days). Speakers Please state your name and address for the benefit of the Court Reporter prior to testifying. When referring to an exhibit, please state the eachibit letter. Time Limits If necessary, the Chair may employ a time limit of 3 minutes for individuals and 10 minutes for organized ,� groups. Testimony The Boundary Review Board Act requires the consideration of ceRain factors (see RCW 36.93.170) and specifies objectives the Board must seek to accomplish (see RCW 36.93.180). Testimony and evidence related to these factors and objectives will be the most effective. Cross-Examuiation Witnesses generally may not question other witnesses or the Board. The Chair may allow cross- examination of expert witnesses under limited circumstances as described in the Board's Rules of Practice and Procedures. Rebuttal The rebuttal shall be limited to 10 minutes. Rebuttal must be prefaced by a citation of the disputed testimony. Rebuttal may not include closing statements, a summary, or any additional information, unless such information is in answer to questions and issues raised in previous testimony. � , � AGENDA, November 3, 2004 Page Five RCW 36.93. 170 Factors to be considered by board-- Incorporation proceedings exempt from state environmental policy act. In reachinq a decision on a proposal or an alternative, the board shall consider the factors affectinq such proposal, which shall.include, but not be limited to the followinq: (1) Population and territory; population density; land area and land uses; comprehensive plans and zoninq, as adopted under chapter 35.63, 35A.63, or 36.70 RCW; comprehensive plans and development requlations adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW; applicable service aqreements entered into under chapter 36.115 or 39.34 RCW; applicable interlocal annexation agreements between a county arid its cities; per capita assessed valuation; topography, natural boundaries and drainage basins, proximity to other populated areas; the existence and preservation of prime � agricultural soils and prodiictive agricultural .uses; the likelihood of significant growth in the area and in adjacent incorporated and unincorporated areas durinq the next ten years; location and most desirable future location of community facilities; (2) Municipal services; need for municipal services; effect of ordinances, governmental codes, regulations and resolutions on existing uses; present cost and adequacy of qovernmental services and controls in area; prospects of qovernmental services from other sources; probable future needs for such services and controls; probable effect of pr�oposal or alternative on cost and adequacy of �,, services and controls in area and ad�acent area; the effect on the finances, debt structure, and contra�ctual obligations and riqhts of all affected qovernmental units; and (3) The effect of the proposal or alternative on adjacent areas, on mutual economic and social interests, and on the local' qovernmental structure of the county. The provisions of chapter 43.21C RCW, State Environmental Policy, shall not apply to incorporation proceedinqs covered by chapter 35.02 RCW. [1997 c 429 § 39; 1989 c 84 § 5; 1986 c 234 § 33; 1982 c 220 § 2; 1979 ex.s. c 142 § 1; 1967 c 189 5 17. ] RCW 36.93.180 Objectives of boundary review board. The decisions of the boundary review boarcl shall attempt to aGhieve the following objectives: (1) Preservation of natural neiqhborhoods and communities; (2) Use of physical boundaries, includinq but not limited to bodies of water, hiqhNays, and land contours; - (3) Creation and preservation of logical service areas; (4) Prevention of abnormaliy irregular boundaries; (5) Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouraqement of incorporation of cities in excess .of ten thousand population in heavily populated urban areas; -e {6) Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts; (7) Adjustment of impractical boundaries; (8) Incorporation as cities or tos+ns or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated areas which are urban in character; and _ (9) Protection of agricultural and rural lands which aze ;� designated for long term productive aqricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the county leqislative authority. j1989 c 84 § 6; 1981 c 332 § 10; 1979 ex.s. c 142 � 2; Z967 c 189 § 18. ] , � i � i � II� I � � i � Il� �� , :. . :,.. . . . . ,,,,,� •� � . � ' . • • , l,�� ' • - . ` �II�1 �� ,, �� • �� 1 . �Y� - , �,I� ' ��11� r■..� �� T , � ,,,,,,.._ - �� _�.r � � _�-_ _ �.,�-„-�,.: � = � `�� . � � : � .. �, �,! �al.�, �;= - ur„■ flliii�� :��' :�'��r � : ►1: R�s� � � ' � � � � I�� iiw �� : ;�� i �IIIIiI11:1�ii►�1111� �/IIL�Si�11� � !1lIILL�IIIi' _._..�__� � __: � II� - � � �I� 1�/�Rr�' :1� � - ,�� ..�.�� !�� 11� r �. ' ��.� :::;�� u��ci� ..■.�...■■i ��«w► � / � ... .�� ;�:::�i �� '_'��r �� /�� ,�� r.-� � � �lZr�'� �♦ I�� v�, „ - -� ♦ � II�l11 Ij� ��► � � �� .. ,� � �� i� ��z�v�u �� ►��o�l��► i�� +� ♦ F,,�� i, ��v♦ �i�� /��.w i►� �i: ��, ��. �� ,=i� � . . 7�� 7 �I� i: n■ �� II�� i► � �� ■ a��;� �� ■ 11LIClEi��j; ��tl.►n. . �►� ► �� . � . 1�� 3� � �� '-�� Yr■�ac�t �\► �/Ir►�� C,��q'-'� .'3�� " � m�3'w.� �• �� A�11�A� ��■�� i��l,�'�u "� � e� ' ��.:� ,� �� ut�u��llCi IIIIIIr��/�/� � '�./L�� I��':1� Q�:la� , � W3��1 a/ � � w��/Ir�!l71��rl�� q� �11�� 1� � � ► ,��► 11 � '�-'�.�isiiiiill �/��- �' • � ,- i��,t1��7�i�'fi�J�1� �+i /��1 i G:'' � �� • �� ' � t�� ► c•w �� 1� �� C� :<�.1�1 ��q �i�� !' � � �� f R��y�� f��_r•_��!1� !�lllt►!� I � f�►� �i► • �� ,''��"�'��'�� = � �'+j��,�i�� ' �`� � ��.��t►�� i�t�1111�r ��! � ��il�6�:� � � �,�� ■ �u��r��.1 •�i��:11uf1ll��■ � � ■ ,�� I�j� � 1_• �:- –� �,, �--�-•� ■ �� \ � �I . :��I��r.■■�.� � � �� ► �1�� ..�.� �� C_ �� , � � � �■ w . �► � �',, 7 �� ., '' 7 / ',� �1 ■ �.. � �� ../ . � - : �� ,,� � �„'I � - , ♦ ■ .�i% � '� � - '� /� �� ■ � ,�� : �� . . � :� � � � ■ . �S . � ' ,�� 11�/ ` � , � �� r� !� � .:�.. � il�� 1 E :�' :: � ::...: ' J � ,� .� ��■ ■��' ■ � �-_E�l�l��li�il�� l� ■ �� : :1 w �� •� �1lfIILI�I 11��i 1.■ ��Vi�� tu�u��►`il� . � � ■ • ''" ■�� IIIIIIIII�IIIIi3 � �� :�� ► �� 1�� -E� r�� — �I�E� �L� ��(�Q��iI�`(�i� '■ ��1►.��A�� . i' �,= � : �� ui��ljli��l� ii yc,,'� ` C � - � �� e��,�� :■ Rf:� � �� : u�� t�u�� i ::� �"„��a� C�. � ..�a ��■� .. .,.�-�-- —_— — • , � � , ` I , � � � � � � � :•:�:•:>:�::>::�■;t�:ss:::�::�s:�::�:;�::�a:::�:�:�s:: �' 1 � •�� '� � ' . � i• I. �::�;�;:�:�:::�:�:�:. � , 111 � . . �- �. - .� .�. . � . � � _- '- . � �� . . � •�. •. � • � `� . - ►� ;; CITY OF RENTON � Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning K y Keotker-Wheeler, Mayor Alex Pietsch,Administrator September 3,2004 Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary Washington State Boundary Review Board Yesler Bldg.,Room 220 400 Yesler Way Seattle, WA 98104 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR 15-DAY TIME EXTENSION—MERRITT II ANNEXATION Dear Ms. Blauman: Thank you for your letter of August 30,2004 notifying the City that the Boundary Review Board will meet on September 27�', 2004 to set up a public hearing for the Merritt II Annexation. We understand that pursuant to RCW 36.93.100 the Board is required to make a finding within 120 days after the filing of a request for a public hearing. King County apparently made such a request on August 27,2004. This would establish a deadline of Friday,December 24,2004, Christmas Eve. In light of the fact that many potential participants may be unavailable in the latter half of December,we are requesting that the Board consider extending this deadline to January 15,2005. Thank you in advance for the Board's consideration of this request. Sincerely, Alex Pietsch Administrator cc: Jay Covington Rebecca Lind Don Erickson � 1055 South Gra y Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N T O l�T �This paper contains 50%recycled matenal,30%post consumer A H E A D O F T H E C U R V E 09i29i2004 11'ED 09:35 FA� 2062966803 Boundar3� Revie�v Board �004 . . _ . ' � �� v L� ( S- T�-F c� r-t�0 ��-� W I L�L C�r•J S' � �� ------ �X-��S�D� Subject: File No. 2178 City of Renton Merritt II Annexation. Tentative Review Schedule in Response to Invoking of Jurisdiction: Event Date Begin Date End Jurisdiction Invoked/120-Day Review August 27 January 14 Period Begins BRB Approves Request for Public Hearing Sept. 27 Sept. 27 Public Notice (Legal Notice; Notification to October 1 October 31 Affected Parties) Briefs Due ('� October 20 October 20 Posting of Site October 20 November 1 Packet to BRB October 25 November 1 Public Hearing &Tour November 3 November 3 BRB Deliberations/Agrees to Consider November 3 November 3 Expansion of Annexation Area Staff Prepares Record of Proceedings November 3 November 6 Public Notice (Legal Notice; Notlfication to November 9 December 8 AfFected Parties) Briefs Due('�) December 1 December 1 Posting of Site December 2 December 2 Packet to BRB December 5 December 5 Public Hearing December 13 December 13 Public Hearing (Continued) December 14 December 14 BRB Deliberations/Preliminary Decision December 13/14 December 13114 Staff Prepares Record of Proceedings December 15 December 18 Staff Prepares Hearing 8� Decision Report December 21 December 28 BRB Approves Hearing & Decision Report January 14, 2005 January 14, 2005 Appeal Period January 15, 2005 February 14, 2005 (�The Board stafl ensures that briefings submitted by this due date will be provided to the Board and reviewed by the members in advance of the hearing. Materials can be submitted any time up to, and including,the public hearing. However, due to time constraints, the Board may have less opportuniry to conduct comprehensive review of these materials. 09i29�2004 tiVED 09:35 FA� 2062966803 Boundary Revie�� Board f�003 . � e .. �c�� c��. i� '�a ��D C'�-o �sLs NoT � � caiVS �� 2 � x�P��s�o� Subject: File No. 2178 City of Renton Merritt II Annexation, Tentative Review Schedule in Response to Invoking of Jurisdiction: Event Date Segin Date End Jurisdiction Invoked/120-Day Review August 27 January 14 Period Begins BRB Approves Request for Public Hea�ing Sept. 27 Sept. 27 Public Notice (Legai Notice; Notification to October 1 October 31 Affected Parties) Briefs Due ("`) October 20 October 20 Posting af Site October 20 November 1 Packet to BRB October 25 November 1 Pubiic Hearing &Tour November 3 November 3 BRB Deliberations/Preliminary Decision November 3 November 3 Staff Prepares Record of Proceedings November 4 November 7 Staff Prepares Hearing & Decision Report November 8 November 14 BRB Approves Hearing & Decision Report December 9 December 9 Appeal Period December 10 January 10, 2005 ('�Tha Board staff ensures that briefings submitted by this due date will be provided to the Board and reviewed by the members in advance oi the hearing. Materials can be submitted any time up to,and including,the public hearing. However,due to time const�aints,the Board may have less opportunity to conduct comprehensive review of these materials. (�`) If the Board determines that the members should consider expansion of the annexation boundaries, then a second set of hearings must be conducted to hear residents from the entire area. In that case, the schedule provided below will prevail. -`,i� � F1 _ � GQ � � � J �.+ 3 � .o `� � G � V] � � � ^ � .� x � � � � _� � . � � � �o � � � � ° v� � � $ b K d � Q ^ 3'� � ,� �' ` o � � � � � �� o � �. � �8 ,a � '"> � � ;� �. � _ � � b = � � � aw � �y Rv � � � q •� ,�z � � o � � o � N � w � •o U � •� ^d `'~ � �K �, � bA � � W o o e ,� N �n �� E ,� E � � � � � � � � � � pQ `° -a � N � •^�' v � � � 'v,l � m° ° LT.�.1 � :�; _ � ^ 'J ` f� (`1 (7 ^ .� , � �� f, i^ �ll^, ^ !. �� ,'-. � �r,..l1 :z r�� ^- "- G .i-y / � ,r rl j f�1 i j— .� cC c, U f � a�i �a� �� c'� .� o � � 1kj ` a o^ � � o `°y'' o i � .� �.,� O� 3� e�0 T O f � � � r'� t�. C'�7! �'C "O �I� vl � Q �? •�� 0 � � �'g '� � � C � O �p C •� � Q ��' �� e� � U o •� � •G v .� ,c n, �g � � pq � �� .� = 3 ��M U � � �8 d � � , ` � ajz at" N `�.� U�o, bA " .� � T � � �, � y y¢ L� � � �� o -- o U� o � � c� c -/� % � � (3,� ' � oi�C ci�?i = � - ^� ^ �. �L' U) :� '/:� - :G i - C'�f `o co . . . • . . � . :�,.;;�. IR� y : " �;�z � �. �' w �. � ;a '�x"�f '�i ��ti' , s. � .�� j !�� . . i� `+4 r A'�i'��t`^a�, �,.''k � �``- �` � _ �'� a� 3��'� o- , . :7' '. �' ;.,�, - „. �; ,rj�T�,yN�{b�..�i t- . •�{ .� ;S . fy.� _� I `� 'ha Figure 3-b'icw looking north from ncar 143rd Avrnuc SE at Blayden Figure 4-Vie��lookmg west from Lyons Avenue NE and SE IOOth r��r��n�. Strcct(if c�tendcdl at�4crritt propcm� Existing Conditions -Topography Existing Conditions - Public Services • ucil�r�es -W ithin District#90, Cosl Creek Utility �/ District,and Rentoo � Water Service areas • Fire r� -Within both District 10 �� ' &District 25 T000eraohv-average slope • Schools of 10%to north.Some steep ��, slopes of 40°/a along ridge -Split between Renton � ` � line �� and Issaquah School Disfricts r�_��c=- i,��„_�.��,i,� Existing Conditioils - Piiblic Services Existing Land Use Designation � and Current.Zoning K.C.Land Use Man-Urban � ,,' ' Residential-ldu/ac - ` K.C.Zonine•R-1- ° � Residential 1 dW rg�.sac ,;., - _ �. N'atcr l,'�tility Dishicts - Figurz 7-Counry Zaeeg Map Plenrr n.��.urr o�.�n��.�iao Existing Land Use Designation and Proposed Zoning Fiscal Impact Analysis Renton Comp Plan Land I� I • General Fund cost and revenue Use Map-Residential implications . , Lo�+�Densiry —Assumes potenrial of±17 single-family detached homes at fult develt�ptnettt Renton Prezonin¢-area + —Assumes a new home value of$400,000 prezoned R-1 (1 du/net '� : acre)in 1997 Assumcs?d��°ellines cuttentl��on,ite Figure R-Rentai l.ard Uxe Map Fiscal Impact Analysis Relevant Boundary Review Board Objectives Curtent Dev Full Dev • Preservation of natural :vo chonge nei<�hhorhoods and cotiimuniti��s � fZC�Cnu�i: SK.��` $�$.33i • C.cul�hF:icalhound�rie., I L��s(�in�an�Ip��i��r)hnrui�l�u�i�-� includine hut not limrted to , hodic,of��atcr.hi�,h�+av:. �I and land cunt�wrn� � '� — -- + Cusl�: $7.�i� S'_6.1�7� • C'rcutiun�nd pr��.cn�tiun of ! .1�rhu��1 di,�tr iri d��c�nn��h�u�,��mJ lo<�ic�l.�'ni:curcu: � ��°rivr�°��rc�t�prr��i��c�li�;i,r.�<<1�., • Prc�cntion ufuhnonttullc '�. B�+t�nchiri�•c�nl�rim pr�r�iim�f+mur urc�ulur houndariu � unn�-ruiio�i�tn C�G:1 h�,iniJ�n i Surplu�<DCtiCil> S 1.301 SZ.ZOR . Inc��r��or,inan a citi�:�x �� I�a��c�itrnn��u�i�i�r��n t��rwrr�� tu��ro�u unncwtion to '�� Onr-�imee�pencea l'n�M,.wyw•vum�ndJ�•�elopmem.�:in,vt,�, iili�':ot�(u��n� _. _ _ _ Relevant Boundary Review Conclusion Board Objectives Merritt II Annexation in best interests and general • Dissolution of inactive Not upplicuhle. There ure no welfare of the City of Renton special purpose districts. rnactive special pur�se districts in unmccation urru Furthers City Business Goals ' -Generally consistent with City policies for annexation • :Adlu.tm�nt o�impractieal 'i Bmrn�lurie�<�a�in�rrim. R�°n(oi� hound�ric, � intrn�lc I��mur��cill n/�ita/?9:4 -Con,istent with Ci[v policies for lo�c density sin,le- � nilhin nr.ci/i•ir rrurc lunul}rc�oncs wch a�R-I • Incor�oratiun a,ciucs ur Gcnrr�lh�eon�i�tcnt n ith Boundan�Re�ic�� [3oard I '�� 1/rn�itlll��nnr.culinn.cilrccin �rrt�na tu��n,or aim�`�xuons tu I Xrntnn:�dc<vi:na(rd Pu7i'nliul citi�,or to��nc of i�t�irrutioi�:lrea un�l�ic�ucl�.i.� �'�Gnor r��nue�uq�luc at fidl de�'elopinent uninron�oi,ucd aree�chich � d.ci��nutr�l"iu�han"in hr�di�li�� 1_�a°pt for parks.n��major,er�ice deticicnciea identificd �re urban in char;�cter C�nunm�ntd Citc rum�n�eheitsirr i plun.v . , � I�Tii � , , , � .° on '��•� �� : - I^ ��:i: � i � �► �/� ; � y � _ �,�'.,r� :: I �•� � �� ,r i ` a' � �i�� `�tL� G. � x �` ,.n.`.�� •: � ��.,�t� pl�. F.� .� ��iiW'I��Fj� •� �,,� �:7. ��/. �r'-� �►' � � h i ia... �� ' �11.��R R�� p ~` ��'-="�i:q �V �� .:�. �j'�ii��\IIp1I11 � M� tV = ,-.��•e,' � _ �� i�� `•,��.L ^ � .��Q � /� � �� :�� 3 _ �_� ��: :�� °' � , :�'t=�I � '■�-':��/-► � � ? ° 5, �,i� �'tii�� i':r r ' ��i� i ��/, � �i q '� = r��I� N�j1�� 1 - s • er 5. rw �'//1 �� .i:� � � � � „_�r -•' ,��Rtl i��I/� •� �� „� � ;:, :JII '� ��%L .. �y � � c �1� :n � ��i : i M�`V�yz��`�� •_ ►.1 ; E' ' Y ."'i `Y s" � ' ��' J' ' �,,��. .. � � �� . � ��'J; r � Zy � � !�r v ��p �, . � � ►, . �i .�+r . . •� �� /i �' f I/ '�" ::a�Z � . un >C �=.:' � � c��:. W N � � e�a 'l»' ��_i. �� '� 3 � N � .^�,�•� � IL -�- 1: �o�• ce: � •n�e�a: � � 8 0 � � �� p -- '��' h•� d��'t��.az'a � e � 0 U � � .. � o� c+ ° .`_G , � c � L � b �' T� � �� a� �-` � �,,.., 52 � c� 3 ^�� ; ��`,,,•-a.:: � • 0 .O v. �' � � —�"� .��W �•�, ��.�. r�i y�,�E,'. t'� �i yN � C(1 �+ � p ll� ❑ y � ��": �= u�L�i� N � � S .7 �� Cl• C .n'��? iy'R�� .. O % 'O p � c0 TJ r�i� a+ � Q �. � ..��y,.�.� �i1�1.�1, ,. C� 0.M U� 3 'Cc� O O 7y N . 'R.I'�'�Y�o. :yJll C� O� C � 1:'�'i 'C ��,L 7J T7 r �i �.,. .]' p ,.��,r, 0. �. � v � 7 >i �':�3 � � v��, T.e e _ �! 7 PG o >` �J ��'i<��'';:'�s•�� a� � � w �.n .. 1� "s* ;n!0; i< �� .b j � � o �+ � - > L d 4Q o�e`v � � o� ?��wo a�''��0� j � .` � l7'Y� � Q ~Vi L � �V � VyJ N � �� .!NJ�N i •1 i �4:��1 � � � G Q.Q V � 0 � G = p� �1 �1}IG�1 II��,�:lR: �� .d ^ '� C. C G '■ �„ . i.1 �I lfi..��tj��k � C � • V y aa C C y R�p,� 'I .�1 • • ��" .•',An,'��al 4�:n"�wl €c'.i. �1 lp O CI fp ti, � p;I��d�F�'. 0. �i. U 2� a 3�n o � `'�. `":,c, .�.a�g' � K � � . . . x v � o;�- �AI�-a.a O W.°� dv�i Ws� . . o a • . . ,� � Compliance with Relevant I �. ��) Countywide Planning Policies `/ • Policy CA-�. Adjacent King Cnunn�and Re�urni huve �' f juri�dictions shall identify and w»rked tngelher to protec�x�hn1 � protect hahi[at net��ork.that are i�lhe�crpun�Ic�d 9lrrrill/1 align�d at�uri.diction3l �� uniir.rulio��reu u.c un m�h<iii ,y,� boundaries ci/�uru�or u�:d cuntinuou.+luu �- de�uitv oprn snace hahrtutJi�r � i(II , tivildlife �i�is +' � �w ■ � • Policy CA-10. Jurisdictions Renton hus udupted the Mm� � F��'L"� G 1 shall maintain or enhance water Creek Busin Actinn Plun which ■ y��r �� ,� � �'� quality Ihrough con[rol of recnn:nrencic.coh�ing prnhlems at �� i� '�N q; � runoff and bect management ihur.�uurrr H h��n Jrucihle ur7d �•- .�y� ��r��a%iN�y�� : i� Pru�ti�c�tu maintain natural , ,�� c�h lm�d��r/�r��rr�p�i��n,� ■�� • ►��/ r�� =,�� 'iyuati�cuinmuniti�;�nd .. �'LiL El/ Niae� \��/%►+��j) hin�h�ial u.e� �'. „r�(,� �!!N�/ a��\�� !/!�l'u C/�f�+t�'��C`�� .�■ �x�tm�r .,,. 'a:i:.., ''r@__�rr" r Compliance with Relevant Compliance with Relevant Countywide Planning Policies Countywide Planning Policies • Polict LU-27. Urban separators The e.rpunded A4erritt!/ • Polic� LU-32. A city may The expanded Merritt❑ shall be detined as permanent a�mexatinn.site is r�rinmrilr annex terntury only within iU annexahon area is located�;ithin lo��-density lands,which protect desrknnted Gi•eenbelliUrhan designated putential annexation Renton's PAA and the City is adjacent resource lands,Rural Separu7or on the Cnr�nn•'.s Lund area. All cities shall phase prepared W provide a fid!range of 1i�eas,and cm�ironmcntally C'��e.11o��ond R�-ciJrmiul Lrnr annexations to Coincide with the arban setvioes mctuding polioC, �, ,cn.iti�c are.n and irc�ut��ip�n ��1)rn�i�r un Ri�iinui'c Lducl C'at Hbilityto COOrdin8tCt112 f1tI1 ff�.W8tC[(pOtti09�.SGwCt prov�sion a full range of utb�tt (portiat)aud surfea cra6p' ��:t��.oiridur:��ith�nand �� lbi/z �A�I9Y'Rr�zt�m��rr_nnr�l ServiCestoBteeSSnne7CCd t118�t h�l��C�n l7han:1K.i. �Ihi,�u�t'<i R-l. l th�n�7 unr • Policy CC-6. A re�ional open The proposed expanded Mertitt 11 Poh�� LC-31 I.ich C iic.hall 7/r �.q�an!�( u ru i��,u��n) :p��;�;tcm:hull he e:wbli.hed unn��ation area includu hahitnt � d��i_nat�.i��ot�°ntial.innc��non �K�nt��n �d< (�nurrd P.-i.-i. h to mcludc land.��hi.ir cl IUnd>und drainasr f��uturrs ❑rc� L,ich E,otrnnul.�nnc�;ition <In�-�mq nrrrhq��hu�,�I�nn� Cuntain natur�l arcu;.h�hitut � includin_�thus��rcl,Hrd io!lta�� :ir��.hull hc.�>ccillr to��urh�ii�� d7�ir�ril iin�i��lh��i�m ut�hiv tirn�� lund,.n�tw��l dr�ma��•��atur�•.. � Crc��l�uliich Ilo��:acro..thr :in�l,uch:irc�..hall nut o�erlap � und or other em ironm��ntul. northcrn third o(the�reu�rom ea>t � cultural,un�i>ccnic rc.ourc�':. '� to��e,t Compliance with BRB Objectives Compliance with BRB Objectives • Preservation of natural Does aot d'ividt a�s7ing • Discouraeement of multiple Not applicable neighborhoods and • neigkbodtoods incorpor,itions of,mall cities communities and��ncouraecmcnt uf • UseofphysicelboutldaziCS, • Usaqwiafpvnpedw�sysmrd in�oiTorationofcitic.in i, includingbodiesofwater. cifybowndoiieetodtfinea�to ��cr,>oft�n�hou,and hi�hways,and landcontours population in hca�ily populated urfian areas • Creation and preservation of Placin$aao w�der one logical service areas • n�unk�paljptttdlef�ia_r�°► • Dissolution of inactive special Not applitoblG TAer�t wr no ��'�s"'^'^D°� purposedisuicts lnectiv[�eridpwrpaet sko Lwprovtsenia �� • Preventionofabnortnally • Bowedoriesbaroweerrgrlar . �qdjustmentofimpractical Notappfkabta B�lier irregular boundaries fdling oat this aret aj boundaries anneratiaa am 4aa Renton s PM re�� Compliance with BRB Objectives ' Conclusion � i • Merritt II,as proposed(20.b acre.s�or an expended Mecr�II �i • Incorporation as cities or F,xpnnd�d arn�x�ion um � Annexation ama(133 acres)both g�}y Comply with RCW ! towns or annexation to cities is designaeed"nrban"in , 36.93.I80 3 or towns of uninco�porated botk tlet Coanry and CiJy � area which are urban in coinpnhensive plons '� • Consolidating existi�ng island of ' tapd aast of ' character � Newcastle Road(136'"Ave SE}endier a siagle' wroubd f make coordination between exiati dsstricts�d 1 • Protectionofagriculturaland Notopplicabk � govemmdnteasiec Renta►ise�ofpmvi�a Y�esy�' � rural lands�+hich are y services,including a�stbk�$�M � d�.ienatcd thr lone tcrm ��i � pruciuc�i�c agriculiural and ' • Both areas eomply with County and Ciry Comp Plans which have re,�,urce u,e h}a � mn�d pr�oned it fur lo��deasity reaidential romprcltcnsi�c plan adoptcd � hc thc�ounty�k��:lati��e � • I3udi arca��ere preroned by R<nton in 1997 to R-I.one unit per auth��rit�� net acre,reflec�ine�he�rea':encironmen��l seroib��itv und �r�rnbclt urban.cpmator statu,. � � _i � R • _ � CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: October 21,2004 TO: James Benton, Chairman King County Boundary Review Board -�G''��' FROM: Alex Pietsch,A ministrator Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson(x-6581) SUBJECT: Proposed Expansion-Merritt II Annexation Area ISSUES: Whether the boundaries of the Merritt II Annexation should be expanded to include the whole portion of Renton's Potential Annexation Area south of SE May Valley Road and east of Coal Creek Parkway? BACKGROUND: The City received a Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation for approximately 20.59-acres in September 2003 (Figure l, Vicinity Map). Renton City Council authorized the circulation of a 60% Direct Petition in February 2004 which was certified by the County Assessor's Office in March 2004. In May 2004 the Council authorized the Administration to submit the Notice of Intent package to the Boundary Review Board. Because the annexation and surrounding area were prezoned in 1997 no public hearing was reGuired on rezoning the site from King County's R-1 zone to Renton's R-1 zone. Near the end of the Board's 45-day review period in late August,the County Executive's Office invoked jurisdiction. Among the concerns raised by the Executive's Office were the following: 1) The County's continued ability to provide efficient local services in an urban unincorparated area with irregular municipal boundaries and relative isolation between the cities of Renton and Newcastle; 2) Environmental and surface water management issues associated with the May Valley corridar; 3) The application of appropriate zoning to protect the regionally designated May Valley urban separator; 4) Consistency with adopted plans and policies including the King County Comprehensive Land Use Plan, and the Countywide Planning Policies; and, 5) Consistency with Boundary Review Board Objectives. DISCUSSION: � - `� Proposed Expansion of Merritt II Annexarion Area 2 10/21/04 1) Regarding the issue of providing efficient local services in an urban unincorporated area it is clear that if the annexation site was expanded to include the whole contiguous area east of Coal Creek Parlcway SE and south of SE May Valley Road to the Renton city boundary, the County would not be faced with serving this relatively isolated unincorporated pocket of King County. 2) Regarding��;��rs��environmental and surface water management issues associated with the May Valley corridorJstaff note that the City of Renton has adopted the May Creek Basin Action Plan, February 1998, King County and City of Renton which requires "full mitigation"for any future increase in density for areas draining to May Valley. In so doing, the plan attempts to make use of existing County and City policies and stormwater management controls such as those contained in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. In addition, developments occurring within areas annexed into the City in the May Creek Basin are encouraged to comply with the Manual's Level-3 flow control standard. 3) Regarding the County's concern about the application of appropriate zoning to protect the regionally designated May Valley urban separator, staff note that the majority of the area south of SE May Valley Road and east of Coal Creek Parkway SE within Renton's PAA was prezoned in 1997 to R-1, one unit per net acre, consistent with the objectives of the Countywide Planning Policies. A small existing subdivision along SE 100`�' Place was prezoned R-4, four units per net acre,at that time. As noted above, the existing City of Renton R-1 and R-5 prezones for the expanded annexation area are consistent with the intent of the May Creek Basin Action Plan as well as relevant Countywide Planning Policies. The latter include the following: . ..��;,�. �,;_;� :��;_::->.. :-��a,_,,.��.:-.�,.<a:°� :-f��.,a� a�� G,;�s. � ��; ,= ;• - �:�:<`, �,� - _. �� =�' �. , h ��"��r�, Relevant��oaii�yw�+�e Pianning,Po�icies�= � `Criy`of�ieinton�es d�ise��-��',°:�`�:,:;�'`-:.>.:V;��,�.':;u<y. ._ - �; . �; Policy CA-7. Adjacent jurisdictions shall identify King County and Renton have worked together and protect habitat networks that are aligned at protect this expanded annexation area as an urban jurisdictional boundaries. Networks shall link separator and continuous low density open space large protected or significant blocks of habitat habitat for wildlife. In 1997 the City of Renton, within and between jurisdictions to achieve a pursuant to RCW 35.A.14.330 and 340, prezoned continuous Countywide network. T'hese networks the expanded annexation area to the City's R-1 shall be mapped and displayed in comprehensive zone consistent with its Residenrial Low Density plans. desigr_ation. This zone allows a maximum of one dwelling unit per net acre. Provisions are also being developed to promote clustering of new dwellings in this zone, fiuther enhancing open space habitat. Policy CA-10. Jurisdictions shall maintain or Renton has adopted the May Creek Basin Action enhance water quality through control of runoff Plan, which recommends solving problems at their and best management practices to maintain natural source when feasible, and suggests some land use aquatic communities and beneficial uses. prescriptions and development restricrions toward this end. The Plan also often imposes, at the project level, in areas with sensitive lands subject to erosion and flooding Level 3 Flow Control Standards from the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. H:�EDNSP�PAA�Annexations�vferritt#2�BRB Merritt II Issue Paper.doc�cor '"� _ Proposed Expansion of Merritt II Annexation Area 3 10/21/04 .,u;� .:.�.- ��,� � -�_` -�:�_ :,:, �a �y'-�..,=;;� ��,�:�,�&�,, _ ��-:,. °'�: :.�;M ��eleva�►tA`Coiin". `dePlaniiii�i� P�i�isie��;,::�.,` ';City.af�eiifaiiResp�ps+e:� . ��,-: t3`r'i'� ii�` � . :�:. Policy LU-27. Urban separators are low-density As noted above the King County Comprehensive areas or areas of little development within the Plan Land Use Map designates most of the Urban Growth Area. Urban separators shall be expanded Merritt II Annexation area as Urban defined as pern�anent low-density lands, which Separator/Greenbelt and Renton has designated it protect adjacent resource lands, Rural Areas, and as Residenrial Low Density as well as prezoned it environmentally sensirive areas and create open to R-1, one unit maximum per net acre. The area is space corridors within and between Urban Areas, intended as an open space corridor beriveen which provide environmental, visual, recreational Newcastle and more urban areas of Renton as well and wildlife benefits. as habitat for wildlife. Poliey LU-31. In collaboration with adjacent The subject expanded annexation site is part of counties and cities and King County, and in Renton's designated Potential Annexation Area. consultation with residential groups in affected Renton's PAA does not overlap that of any areas, each city shall designate a potential adjacent jurisdiction at this time and is shown on annexation area. Each potential annexation area Renton's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. shall be specific to each city. Potential annexation areas shall not overlap. Policy LU-32. A city may annex territory only The expanded Merritt II annexation area is located within its designated potential annexation area. All within Renton's Potential Annexation Area and cities shall phase annexations to coincide with the Renton is ready to provide a full range of urban ability for the city to coordinate the provision of a services to this area including police, fire, water full range of urban services to areas annexed. and sewer utilities, and surface water management. The Coal Creek Urility District serves the northern portion of the area and the eastern third is served by the Water District No.90. Policy CC-6. A regional open space system shall .�e expanded Menitt II Annexation site is be established to include lands which: designated primarily as Greeenbelt/Urban a. Provide physical and/or visual buffers such as Separator on King County's Comprehensive Plan open spaces, which help to separate Land Use Map and as Residential Low Density on incompatible uses, distinguish the Urban and the City of Renton s Comprehensive Plan Land Rural Areas, define Urban Growth Use Map. The whole area is intended to function Boundaries, or establish the character of a as ari urban separator between Renton and neighborhood,community,city or region. Newcastle. b. Provide active and passive outdoor recreational The northwestern comer of the expanded area opportunities which are compatible with the includes King County owned open space as well as environmental and ecological values of the parks/wilderness. site;and/or c. Contain natural areas, habitat lands, natural The proposed expansion of the Merritt II drainage features, and/or other environmental, Annexation includes habitat lands and drainage cultural,and scenic resources. features including those particularly related to May Creek, which flows from east to west through the upper portion of the area. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The applicants originally proposed a much smaller annexation,now referred to as Merritt II so as not to confuse it with the enlarged area proposal. The County has suggested expanding this annexation to encompass the whole portion of Renton's PAA surrounding it. This encompasses H:�EDNSP�PAA�AnnexationsUvlerritt#2�BRB Merritt II Issue Paper.doc�cor Proposed Expansion of Merritt II Annexation Area 4 � 10/21/04 SE May Valley Road south to the current City boundary,west to Newcastle Road SE and SE 95`i'Way(and a 4.96-acre area west of SE 95"'Way adjacent to the City boundary)and east to Lyons Avenue SE and the Stonegate Subdivision. Virtually the whole 120 acre expanded annexation was prezoned R-1 in 1996. A smaller five acre existing subdivision at the south end of the area along SE 100"'Place was prezoned R-5 in 1997. The R-5 zone is currently being replaced with a new zone, the R-4 zone. Upon annexation,R-1 and R-4 zoning would be applied. Currently King County allows clustering of new development in the R-1 Zone. Renton is preparing to adopt similar provisions for its R-1 in the foreseeable future. 1. Location: The proposed 133-acre irregularly shaped Merritt II Expanded Area is located northwest of the Stonegate Subdivision. It is bounded by Lyons Avenue NE on the east, approximately SE 101s`Street,if extended,on the south,and the City of Renton boundary,WE 95`�'Way and Newcastle Roadll36�'Avenue SE, on the west. 2. Assessed Value: The assessed valuation with current development for this enlarged area is$14,860,621. 3. Natural Features: The site generally slopes from a high point near SE 100`�Place of 127.87 meters to a low point of 93.78 meters near SE May Valley Road. A ridge runs diagonally through the middle of the site with plateaus in the southwest,north and eastern portions. The area is considered to be within a high erosion hazard area. May Creek traverses the northern portion of the 120.45-acre site, flowing from east to west. 4. Existing Land Uses: Existing development includes approximately 65 single-family detached dwellings within the expanded annexation site. 5. Existing Zonin�: As noted above the proposed annexation was included in an earlier (1997)prezoning of this area to the R-1 zone(1 du/net acre)and R-5 zone(5 du/net acre),pursuant to RCW 35.A.14330 and RCW 35.A.14.340. The latter zone is being phased out as part of this year's Comprehensive Plan update and will be replaced with the City's new R-4 zone. This change affects only about 5-acres out of the+ 120-acres in the expanded annexation area. 6. Comprehensive Plan: Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the subject annexation area Residential Low Density(formerly Residential Rural). This designation is consistent with the existing R-1 and R-5 prezoning since it allows three zones:RC at 1- du/10 acres; R-1 at 1 du/1 net acre; and R-4 at 4 du/1 net acre. It is also consistent with Land Use Policies LU-36 and LU-37 pertaining to encouraging annexations in areas where urban infrastructure and services are available for development at urban densities and in areas contiguous to City boundaries such as islands of unincorporated land where Renton is the logical service provider. 7. Public Services: • Water Utilitv: Renton is the designated water service provider for the majority of the area. This includes the area west of SE 144`�Avenue(Ilwaco Avenue NE)and south of SE 96`�'Street, if extended. The area north of SE 96'}'Street,if extended,is served by the Coal Creek Water and Sewer District and the area east of 144`� Avenue SE, if extended is served by Water District No. 90. No additional staff is anticipated as a result of this annexation. • Surface Water: The proposed annexation is located in the Green Creek sub-basin of the May Creek Basin. The site drains to the May Valley portion of May Creek, where there is existing flooding,water quality and fish habitat problems. May Creek flows across the northern portion of the proposed enlarged annexation. Because the City adopted the May Creek Basin Action Plan which requires full mitigation for future increases in surface water runoff from new development H:�EDNSP�PAA�AnnexationsVvlerritt#2�BRB Merritt II Issue Paper.doc\cor Proposed Expansion of Merritt II Annexation Area 5 10/21/04 draining into May Valley, future development will likely have to comply with the 1998 King County Surface N'ater Design Manual flow control standards. No additional staff is anticipated as a result of this enlarged annexation. • Wastewater: The City is the designated sewer service provider for that portion of the enlarged annexation area laying south of SE 96`�'Street,if extended. The area north of SE 96�'Street,if extended, is served by the Coal Creek Water and Sewer District. • Parks: Staff notes that there currently is a shortfall of parks,trails and recreation facilities in the area. May Creek Park lays in the western portion of the enlarged annexation area near Coal Creek Parkway. Staff has calculated an estimated one- time cost of$79,828 as the fair share cost that could be attributed to this annexation, above and beyond revenues that might accrue to the City from parks mitigation fees for new development. � Fire: The City currently serves the western three-quarters of the annexation area under contract with Fire District No. 25. If the Renton City Council and the Boundary Review Board support this expanded annexation area upon its annexation the City will serve the whole area. • Police: The Police Deparhnent generally supports annexations such as this but notes that this,like all annexations,will likely increase the number of calls for service. The accumulative impact of these annexations could eventually require additional staff. • Public Works Maintenance: The division has not yet had a chance to estimate the annual cost of maintaining existing and new streets within the proposed enlarged annexation area. • Transportation: Because the costs of upgrading existing access streets serving new development within the proposed annexation would most likely be borne by those developing properties there should be minimal cost to the City,at least initially. The only expenses the City would incur from a transportation standpoint would be those associated with new signage and pavement markings, street lighting and maintenance costs. 8. Fiscal Analvsis: Staff has conducted a fiscal analysis (see attached worksheet) for the proposed expanded annexation area. This analysis assumes that there are 31 developable parcels in the expanded annexation area representing approximately 52 acres, all of which is zoned R-1, one unit per net acre. Assuming net acreage at 80% of gross acreage there would be approximately 42 net acres available for new development or 42 new dwellings. Staff assumes that these new homes would have an average assessed value of$500,000. In terms of the whole 120.45 acre expanded annexation area there are an estimated 54 dwellings with an average assessed value of $176,800 that could remain. The total assessed value for the 120.45-acre expanded annexation area is $14,860,621. With the inclusion of an estimated 42 new dwellings with an average assessed value of$500,000 the total assessed value for this expanded area would increase to approximately $35,860,621. H:�EDNSP�PAAWnnexationsVvierritt#2�BRB Merritt II Issue Paper.doc\co: Proposed Expansion of Merritt II Annexation Area 6 10/21/04 , The net fiscal impact of the expanded Merritt II Annexation area to the City of Renton without new development is an estimated cost of$798 per year. At full development in ten years with an estimated 42 new homes in the $500,000 price range this deficit would turn into a surplus of$2,967 per year to the City in 2004 dollars. This compares with an estimated surplus of$1,257 per year for the 20.6-acre Merritt II Annexation at current development and an estimated surplus of$2,038 per year at full development. If new homes are built with higher assessed values and existing homes are remodeled, these revenues could further increase. The costs of providing services to this enlarged annexation area would also presumably decline somewhat since service area boundaries would be less fragmented than if annexation occurred over a number of years ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION: 1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The annexation policies generally support this proposed annexation. The subject properties are within Renton's Potential Annexation Area and are subject to development pressure(Policies LU-378 and LU-380). The area is available for urbanization under the King County Comprehensive Plan,zoning and subdivision regulations. Renton is the logical provider of urban infrastructure and services to the area(Policy LU-385). Policy LU-388 states that,in general,the greater the contiguity with the city limits,the more favorable the annexation. 'The proposed area for annexation abuts the city boundary on about 60%of its perimeter. 2. Consistency with the Boundarv Review Board Objectives: a. Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities; The proposed enlarged annexation does not split or change existing neighborhoods. The Stonegate neighborhood to the east will not be impacted by this annexation and property owners within the proposed expanded annexation area are already pretty much an island of predominantly low-density rural zoning. The exception is a small area along SE 100`�'Place at the southern edge of the enlarged annexation area. have signed the 10%Notice of Intent Petition to Commence Annexation. At an existing density of one unit per 2.86 acres for much of the area,there is no established"neighborhood"per se,for much it. The exception is the denser Newcastle Terrace subdivision located at the southern end of the expanded annexation area,which has a density of approximately five units per gross acre. All of this existing subdivision would be included in the enlarged annexation area. b. Use of Physical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water, highways, and land contours; The proposed enlarged annexation area abuts the City of Renton along its eastern, southern and western boundaries and the City of Newcastle along its northern boundary. If approved the enlarged annexation area makes good use of existing physical boundaries using SE 95�'Way/Newcastle Road,and SE May Valley Road for much of its boundary. c. Creation and preservation of logical service areas; The proposed enlarged annexation area is split in terms of sewer service at the current time. As noted above the area north of SE 96`�' Street,if extended, is served by the Coal Creek Water and Sewer District and the south of it is served by the Renton Wastewater Utility. Similarly, the expanded area is split in terms of school H:�EDNSP�PAAWnnexationsVvlerritt#2�BRB Merritt II Issue Paper.doc�cor Proposed Expansion of Merritt II Annexation Area 7 10/21/04 service areas with the western 80%of it served by the Renton School District and the eastern 20% (east of 144`�'Avenue SE)served the Issaquah School District. In terms of fire service,the expanded area is currently served by Fire District 25, which the City serves as the provider of services under a contract with the district. A similar situation occurs with water service with the area west of 144�'Avenue SE and south of SE 96`�'Street,if extended,served by Renton and the area to the north served by the Coal Creek Water and Sewer District. The area south of SE 96�' Street,if extended,and east of 144"'Avenue SE is served by Water District No.90. These boundaries have been approved by the various districts and adopted by King County. d. Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries; The proposed boundaries of the expanded annexation are not"abnormally" irregular. In fact,these boundaries are much more regular than those of the Merritt II annexation by itself and are consistent with Renton's PAA boundaries in this area. e. Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of incorporations of cities in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated urban areas; Not applicable. f. Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts; There are no known inactive special purpose districts in this area. g. Adjustment of impractical boundaries; The expanded annexation area does appear to create more logical boundaries than would typically occur with incremental annexations. h. Incorporation as cities or towns or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated areas which are urban in character; and, King County has designated this area for urban development because of its location within the Urban Growth Area boundary. The county has also indicated that it wants to divest itself from providing urban services to these unincorporated urban areas. i. Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long term productive agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the county legislative authority. Not applicable. No portions of the proposed annexation are designated for long term productive agricultural use in either the King County or Renton Comprehensive Plans. FINDINGS: The proposal is essentially consistent with City policies related to annexation as well as Boundary Review Board objectives and criteria for annexations. No impediments to the provision of City services to the azea have been identified. The City already provides fire services to Fire District No.25,under contract, for example, so there should be no change in service.Water service will continue to be provided by the City to the western portion of the expanded area south of SE 96'�'Street,if extended, and District No. 90 will provide service to the portion east of 144`t'Avenue SE,if extended. The Coal Creek Water and Sewer District H:�EDNSP�PAA�AnnexationsU�ferritt#2�BRB Merritt II Issue Paper.doc�cor Proposed Expansion of Merritt II Annexation Area 8 10/21/04 with provide service north of SE 96`�'Street,if extended. School district boundaries will not change as a result of this proposed annexation. The initial fiscal analysis prepared by staff for this proposed expanded annexation(see attached worksheet)found that there would an initial cost to the City of$798 per year,excluding a onetime parks acquisition and development cost of$79,828. However,after 10 years and the construction of 42 new homes with an average assessed valuation of$500,000(2004 dollars) there would be an estimated surplus to the City of$2,968 per year(2004 dollars). CONCLUSION: The proposed expansion of the Merritt II Annexation site to encompass the whole area of Renton's PAA east of Coal Creek Parkway SE and south of SE May Valley Road is consistent with relevant Countywide Planning Policies and in particular Policies CA-7, CA-10, LU-27, LU-31,LU-32 and Policy CC-6,as outlined above. The proposed expansion of the Merritt II Annexation site is consistent with relevant City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Policies including LU-35, LU-36,LU-37,LU-42 and LU-43. The proposed expansion of the Merritt II Annexation site is consistent with relevant Boundary Review Board objectives in that it preserves existing neighborhoods such as Newcastle Terrace along SE 100`h Place, creates reasonable boundaries using major roadways and city boundaries, results in more efficient service areas, and involves thP annexation of unincorporated areas that are designated urban in character. The proposed expansion of the Merritt II Annexation site would not appear to adversely impact City finances. The enlarge annexation area would initially cost the City an estimated $798 per year (in 2004 dollars) until full development occurs in an estimated 10-years on the 52 remaining developable acres in the enlarged annexation area. With full development there could be a minor positive cash flow to the City of an estimated$2,967per year,in 2004 dollars. Attachments cc: Jay Covington Alex Pietsch Rebecca Lind Don Erickson H:�EDNSP�PAA�AnnexationsVvlerritt#2�BRB Memtt II Issue Paper.doc�cor �'�'�ltit�'� �"_._.... .,� ,� �1.:■ . �•'' , : ��,'��''� ,:��\ 11� ♦ � �� i��, � �k��1? o -•• �� ` � . , r�Q�l� � � � � ��11,�� ,► ,�I � � .,, , w�'/ '" • , � � �r/11 : � � �� ' � - . � •� • ' •� ��` . � ��I 1 ' ��/� 1 ' � � ��i.. • � �;� �?�Wr.� � �D.,��.. ��,,,,.j, �■■ � �,.,,� :: ,, �,. �'��. , % � �ua;��llii �iY�a� � / � - • .y ■4■I�� rt�r.�� % ��y-`��'� � �y ■ �� Wis� � �� •� ■ �� // /. � � _ R�►�■ ��w ��J ��/ - � ■ �� I��i�1��1��1ll�� IIL�i31Y� rr /�//`�'.� "�w - i�ili�i �'��/� �� !'3'lllLrt�iil'll! 11��'irE,,�,►''�I/ � - , , ��!�� ! �i i��Q�`� ��W�[L'�� ll��!�ls�� l�� r� ' ��7i'C��9I ��y , , .� �t ��. a� ��n��r�u��ce�� 1�� .�� ,.��iy��'�i��O■i i�1 �11�/�l�III! :��nU� I/�1 V1��'i�iZ1�'�� r._.'., ��l111�■�■■��■ ma�zrl!. �� y� . a . ��►� � �� –-, ICu�rr��.��o � �� i�i �► ��zv��u ��►�.��►��i�� I o a�� t�� -��;v • ♦� e,■��w •►� ��•�, I �/.�l� v':i� ��r ��t,��I�ii ,-►�+�� III�� 'S►a�l1 ty� �� 'i ��u�I��EfiE�� ,��°��'�:: �: 11LIClEt��i Y�ia�c�i ��\►�/%/h�� p'-'� .'3J� ��'_"� �:_� ��.� �1�� i�i��uiiu'�y� �p�r�� /� '��1�9i�u:/a1�I��':1� Q�1:. � . , ':��'�� : �: �11�� . �� ♦ ��1�� • �. �iaa ��.� ��tur— �I��Rte�en� o. � � - -�� ♦�p �. ��1%� • z tri lc �: � �r 9iJ�,��liiY�J�1� �+� ��1� �� ♦ ��1 �� C -l'ti-i� -� _ `��:n �� N � �'a \�S � � � ♦♦ �►� � / t�1 11�� iYC1 �� ,��►��/\ �f 1 G�� $ ��/ �"-'. � � � � cy .� .�j; �� !1lIWl� II.�►��►��b�i, �-- �,�� w ■ � � t R0 �� ii�� I �� r�a � � ■�. .��r��.�'��i��% � '" ► ♦ : �� ui�uull►>�� I � 7 ■ I r1�j � r.�-.�a �� ,�— ��.��l�►�♦ • �r♦111� R-�� : i��+1�1.l1„r ••—�.i'�-`�' �� r,� � �i�� CL�J�IGLl.1� ��1�fwt+w�s� � � � I/G(�n � !�'�-:I�. ' �I�E;IIL�10lI��t � ,� ■ ,��/��j�� _,. `:: � � :1111� ��11��■■■�� 7�� ;:1::ii��`'� -��=:11��, �� . ■ ' ' � � � _ � ��' ■ � 1,=:` w""....� ■ � ► � ., : ��,A � , � � 1� . �I ll�j� �� = , � '•. •�,R� : .. . ., � ��.,, :� � . . � � - - , ..� - ♦ �j�,� �� . � � �1� ,, �� ' �=��111�� i �� r _ � ..^��,��► :►r"� � ` �� I'� �� ii � ��(:� r .� �� . � �� -L�- - J� ��i�� '�7 ■ � 7F�3lWt��lli'11�1�� ■■■!� ■ I ' � f�� =I� . �.�� YliIIL�'t�l �■��ii� �.., � �s�� . . .� �Wr� `I�� ►IY�l� �LY�tiu�I j i'�: � r- ■� ��c3 '� :�� /r�� ...• �[� �r '■�� ` , �I,�,s+� �.� � . ��Ea . r II��.. �Ejio��t�i� � ,� �� .�� ►�•.�►.�.��p � �� == ��■■�.'_—= � : '��'■� Cj�� ;1� . �au�lu�ru �. �s� L' = � � ♦� �� IA�� I1��1�� ■ = � — �Ih�� F�11�� Ilrl�lll3'�� '��.f�� —""�� . ��. � ="■'� ��■��■�- .. ■� � �� . � • u]3 �... . _�� . .. . ■ ��.• �� u■n c ��a��■ �1111■�� a=�� : �� -"'��i �' �'■,�' ��i►�� ■ ■� � ��.�.L ��I�; u�� .�`"t�lll��i '�. �.�aum „' �� .1�� r•�� . -s'� i a 1111� � I� i��.. � ��rnn��llllll �_ '� � �� n� � ��(I �� • � --ii::� ,��a �� r � ■ ;� � � �� '� � �, — ■I% ��'�: �� — ;� �1►��i� _ ► : � �:: �II i� � - �,� � p �� . _ "�1 :� .�� \I� ��■.� � , � � � �.. � � �� .■��II►f7 /1ii01:111/�'=� �I�� .. .. ,,��w� ��■■..► �� ♦ !� ��11� �� _ ��,��'� ��a�u�e ��■■.�sI.�/11/ �:� � �► �� IClID�tt� - ..�7 S r� � �� i�1�1��.i��'� � 11�� - '��.� � � 1 � � � � � ' � � 1 11 � 11 � � �� • . . �- .. �� .�� : . � � � � = . �• J � ., , %///. �- •. . • � . � • • -� - �- 11� � �. •-• ` � � �� .��'��;��'� �� ., � �`" �uc-..,c.�rar ar.trrr��.�-a d'i ��'��.,.:r , ,,, . , , i �+ � - � �/�- .��.�;�-��.�i,.-`,.-�..,� �..., �{�',��?!� f,` i.wr �4 i11`�"+ � '� �[If'r • V �-�. �r-„ � ��, f ;, � - . �.�%��J�1��,.:��4��===��-.-�.: '�� ' � D {�'r � ��4 .`�`�.. , j!QjQ �- �-� �.�-_.,;_E - _ ' •;' �/i.0 Ir`;.�,��I � l\\\�1`M�i��.r.�•-�..."-�!'=t�.�. .�:--1..i`. . � _ I � ` '^J � � � 1 �/��w 1 � � - 4�11� L_��"`..�-- �. � ir� ,��i � _--3_1![�1�.�' �� r�'��'�� -��►�� ., ��; 1 .A �� '' � _ s��'s�� , ,` E .r i �.,� . . � �� --..._.,_.�''-�:,_ �`�i��,J►�� ia- �:.�� " '� � � � �� ,��' +^ �, �� ;��-..�-,.� � �� ¢`' ^ = , i � r .►�•rr�-.�.�+��'�' � �►� .� �*��- � � p,,. � � �L �.,Q�� s sj�� '� �� ,� � � � --.._ � . ;; r � �� '� ��:=� r a� .ti ; ..ti .,f�� -,.�� `�,�;� .-� �Ii w � �_ � � . . ;;: . �� » � � �. �� .�� , .� .. � �.� � . � � � 11 � ��.,� , ., , � _ _ �� :: ai ,; ''�;. � .•—.—,, � 1��I ��Jn��Q��j��„_��?�:;A�'r',�li� � �� 5/�..,�- �'i I � � ��f. �� ,y,�.9�� "�''�. ,��!,'�'� ,•�°�� ',��,►�� r�•� - f r - � � �� `��i 1 ��5� � ��M� � ��.;/�� l��'� � �,� � �� , -'� �► '� ; ,�.� �u� 11 r �;� �� ''� �� ?��1►��,�► � ��Ii%Abs�+.�� ; ,+�� . � �: � �1 , r � � ►—.^ �.��,��,,. � �ea��l��^',��i.��r..•�r� ��9�,�,�►� ^ ; , ��►'�1 ��.'�`'�'��`��b��,�:�";,;'��. �1�� , r.�i�r��:��/li �i�1 �1:�..:.� � • � �Ir�%/��`�i-r�/�� r��';,`rir�'�'�� \ ,��;� � � �r i�� 5��1��il+ �/ A ,��;,��,li,� ��'�w�'��i`M��`�.�-�..�r��-•.�►��►��,., • ;;!;�%/� 1r��`!�►`��iy'��1��'�,�'r^��,tid�J � �o�, � �N �1 ��:�'••�,(��►� �1��1,�'�•�'�,�_,(�� ' '.� ''" - � �� -r►H �,�; ��j��?,�+�� .- ,'r�1 a. ., �r . ►ta►�� ,�t -ia� %:�r�i � � � �^�� '� y;✓v�,.� ��i►��~ � � i ��I►..� r ;� � 1� ;�� ,,��r �.��r�%,;•�-•—a��!�,�►��.-.. ��'"�, ��lt/�'%� fi�7��s!'a►';�:�✓'=��;i"',��',ei►1�1''°1�!'l�m.�� .� � �1�7t"� �';�~r��i��'��,�� -- ' vr��t�, aa,/y��s►% ,`f►�� ;��. �, ,� '�� 1,'� , ,�;:�: �;�11�'" �;i��rA� ,��, ,� �� . � i�'i� � i� ��r'��r@`e �� IiQr �r�r�y ..� .i.-- +_�I�-:_ '_��fIV ,a ..�� i ? '+�a �►t ��7� �� N�� . �-� -----_- �� ►�l,�`�� I �, l� �� c�r�� y�-��r� r�., ►�`�rt��i�:�'T `�, ��qr � � ', �, i% . >>��:�" I r y�I�'�� rip,;r•� �� -��'r��I��'! / � � ___ , (( ' r � �.✓ �i\�7 �.1��7 �:\:i i�' , r �� ' J�� • � �' 45 �l/ �IIN�il' f l�;�l�l�►�� El� �'`;`i (�-. �"�� /1�� ta� �..��:. 1 :3�l�'•:�:7f� � /��• �n �'►� �� E�'�� EEf � ��..�'��l1 ;�� y I ` =��,�`,��Jw i� ��I �� ►i Y1�7� ��'�,r'si 1;��►�� #= y! �u ryj> � "I,.;,- qp /t � rJ• 1�ll�il"1�� `� �� i11! � ..,��,�',;; r�l.�,�, � �.,�� f1i11�(@� 7 �� `,i��l .f��lil ��iP�7,� ,i%a �'�1 i�i- "��ip�U /�t�■��p�j�M�'��. � . : � ",i�r,t'�r ��li h�� / � �� llylrrwp�\ �:.�� '►� �fi', ��1�w r � ��y�'��';!��J�/ �"� • � g �'�- , ��'1" "`�`, 1� /,d'.2��1��=«r�S� �� '�Pifr'�[•%i��ii�. �'� �f�h��!al��F��1�� , � � w»�� - � � `�t.��/,�+ , � l', ��'�l �4,��It`�� 4�' A��.��i►�'I�L��•'��r�1�76��i,j� .iilr'"n, = : �� , ; ��\\I �,.�• ,� '��►�� inl�i',�1��1 --� _ �� +�ra • : � � .w .:4 �� /� -- -- , �� ' :,� �?_. � .►��/'�" ��',c ,,�� .�� ,�,��=�� '9�, ��►�� • � r�- , _ � , -,.�---, , �� .. . .�� 's�� "t�� `� � -,, r'��/y1� .% 1�+��P�C�Q►q�;►��►l,��' r�� i�'7d��, ��;� . � . . . . ��J�- � �, .��. � ��'� _ "��:,� a,��''M�,,�i�� .�'41_q►I �l:� �� `m��1� . ° .., � - � ��'��Ny��:�::. �. .,�..:. :- � � ��:+�� , s��- �►, ;, �� .:,�� .,��+�� • r,; �r .� ��1�yJ��►ii,�/LEH1�dR�A1i �_�o��r..�. ��- !'rr'�I*�...��.�rl�...�.�i� i��;�11 � •,' \ , � � , ��: �� , � �I a � � � , � i / ��■ ' � 4 ' ' ♦ � � � � � � � � � � � , � �� • . . � , + . . , � � �• ", � � � � . � � . , � � �` ��, . �w � ► 4�. � � � �� ''' � , � � _ i; �, ,C�i-`'�.� �y„-�� • � `t1� ,.� �• �1��, ��!. `i)J�, i►�j�� '� �-i7 �'��' /� � - '�1 <<, �� ,�� ■ . �� :r �c� � � o � , ��%� I�i�� l�1n��'��i' r - - �+r � � I + ---�� G��v.��E r ��,�� ,� �� -� 01 �,.v �� .- � � �.��l��L�� 1'��"��*� • ! ��, =.� i�� .� ��, �� ;�.:'�. ;d� ��1� � � ��1( `� �. . �� llRg � ! �� . ��y - � �J`''�1 I:J:�1 �{�JI�.r�� ' ■ �i �d� �s� r � �� •, ►"'vr i'��^ '1��.w ,,t,�i'rC�l.A� ,�1.a►..�+,�,`�V��1� r. � , ,�• , � �r F f« '� � � I`1 � , � y r r r f y�.4 � j� r r "�1 ��r�-. r �v �i � l 0 � � �M�i��'l�yF.l �f� �� Y��L,V�F M y�� Q �s w � � h� ii� � �� s J�i�` � ��"1 4� ��'r�� !� '� ��~nr�A�� "' �� i� �� 1�� ,��5w.�� uE� �,r. `��".�,;-��r.. �� v� � .. � rn.,c �,,'1 �1�. [,�.�� .c ,�7.��r ��'� ,r�•�.r �,��-;d�� e � ► y � •'� .r r r r �i �� t�� I��1 t � L�l l�-I�, • � ' �� 1 ♦ r rr �. 1 � ��► � �I L � � �[�] G�n ��,�� V �� .��.� �V ��1 �• �r. � : � � ,�� `�� 1�r1 ►1�a,N��r:f�� A� ��r�� i.� � �3 0� - ,�,tt� �� t�n ��c s��.+.r�, ��:?u:.<�s�C.l ��s r.. C�i r•7� t�� ti]� �f�rJ -�n�i-q tJ Yr��i11�j14r,I�iL J�r"�,�vv►:i,J/f1 �jD L�.��i�� .� �' - I/�� "J� �i1! �`Iir�P�il�i �'-'�'��1iJ ,� rr1 U i�A�l�lii�� 1�� ` �:■� '� �� a�� L' �i■� �� 1 ��i7�� c��n �r�, C�.w�'=.�►s±� 7 .. - "� �' � V�� D' r � '�' �D r�><<l ��._�,r��l �]��it�t��ntA�� - � �� [rJ A � � w l�1 J�f� (�] �_�:�_ ��,wt Grir::�n � : � �s��r,:�f e�� 1�1:�� ;��r�.■�� L:�` f�� {' �r � � '�a �.�^�rj� lf�[�7 ,-7 ,�I��` � ��' -` � �� .,,,, . tl r'�►3 Lti7 �_�.. .. � l�� sa t� �� =�C�� C+�l L�7��r�• . � I r � r � . . • J /�� ,. ..� �� `i E>> ei G11s/ �a 0 � � .� �� 1 r � :. 7 �r � �� "�� i��"�� L1[c1 � . 1 r � �.��,C� t:.-Lt��, � � �?II:�� ►�`T f [�l ��':� e(7 � J 1 C�J �-+•- •••1 � r.... n E.--1 •► � �1� r �� '.--� `'■��Ifrr'�i�r7��-•y .��■r�l.�� ^/1t�� 'i ►V� �� r r � ��.�� ..�.�A'j] 7►� � � r. �,f�� `� �� : � Fa� � � C' :�L■� �al '� P.� �`♦i, N ,�!��r".� � -•'r n � t,r,�1►�ar l:,,i �.�_��_C_��7�l� c: ,, r�� «, :,Gc��,;�►�� «.�:�: ' � � � ' � ' � ' . • � . � � � � ..............�::;:::>::::::::::::::::::;:::�::::>:; � � , .. �<:.:;::::::.;:;.<:. . � , „ J • � • �• - �� • �� • • �• •' c� �- •� � � � %///. • � • • � �- 11 � �. •-� • �� :: , , �. ♦� �� , � �i � , �� ___ w j� � : �r . - , . ��~ �_ � � � ►. ' � . • � �.�.,,r�'�� '!,,,�,� �� • • . , � ;�, � ., ,�.�. �� r►1/� • � F � ., -� _� 1 � 1 ► � � �, � _ � � � ` ��,� �` ��1 �". ,. , •1 . , � •� _ �I'�,.,�s . .: ,�, ,.. � �� • .� r �� . . . �� . . . - � .. � ��y � , � �� : �� • �'��3�� ►�� W�ij' �'' ��./�� — _ ►/ � � �� II - � ,. .'' _ �I •,� �.�/�� • ■ !�i'�iil1� �� ► , ��..,. �_�,/,� �� .. �� IIJ.�s��7/ ■ ► �l��IL'�'J��l�:�� ►.�I�� ,�, ;� i - �.��..� �� 1-�• .��'' �11� i�. ��i[��i �� . � �� 1�!!!��lE��i�►�� ► � : � W�L�f��/ ��I /�`�G��►��r� � � �. �. � ►. . r �� • •� ��►'� � � ► ♦ , . . _� ■�� IIA�!!l1111I � !! � �� ►�L�,L'LWV�� ►�►„��I�j ��► �� + �� •�•� �i �� 1/� � • �� i�� `�'1 �� - �� :" 11L1�IE�� i�� IIII� � � �:�'' � r-+ �� c.,� / . �� '��1�/► � .�� '�-r �� a� Yll��a�� t ,��/�►��„ ,,., �' �� R�!l�M�, �.��,=,.� � u��J��J�u :� y� r� �� 1 �� Llll��yll`'�' 111111��►�� I�� ,■ ��,� �.��. 4: ."•��. � e11= = ► ��::'i► �:e :'��:' � �► .. � ♦ �� i/`��.ti��i►� II�Ci�� ■�� 1 � � � � � �� ■ �1 � �l�v � '-� �� is �� .�� '� '� -- . �� r,�►.�f.i�Ic:�i�� , 1 '' � • �� t��i �t� � '�� ` - _ ` 11►l� �I�,� 1��/��i ��!i , �■■ ►�� -- — . � ,! t► � � .� � �� ,�! � ;; �_��i��111�� :! . ►�. ��l��.� �� ' � � � - � - ' - . � � .� � � � :�:: , - � .. .,, . �:: � :. .. � � � „ .- - „ - .. .., � _ , . . . ,, . � � ., , � �,. :, , . . :. �. iiii • � . � � . -. �- �� oii„ �� .�• � �. .-� • �:��T � ° ?. €� �.v ��..�:�..w � y � sje�, i � � ��,�c�z, ,�� y. '� � �q ,,� j 1 �y�. ^�` r��"� , y ''� iR W H`�.�T V . , e � �y F A ! � s �;�� ,�. „�ry, �� ,^ „ �7� �� ""�`_ a� , �r � ` '� � • ?�� i ^ . �ii� �z`�,� '!.. ��-��,� %,�,. `'" .:s:� � J 'x'� . . _. 1f� '� -+'��" � � �' �a '�+.- ;� '� w .sw� � '� 1 :::,.��`s', � � x _ ��r�:�,: �, , � �. �`;��, �� .� «'.► at . �� 'yC �:f f fY, +a�' .�{ �-. R�� i��,y }*� ��.�r�� il �� . '..�� ...p � '�� # �a"� �w � ;� � � z � r ,�� :�i^� s �, . >; ' 3�.'_ a 5" . �...�..,i "` 4"" �'� �t . .> •� �a - *�� t �. M��.s.. . �� .� i`t _ -�Y'� .�?X . .. . . . g� £. .� �� •� ��' . — 'di S� � � � �}. . � �. "' .s: ':` z^� f .�� "'i.- 'yk" . k.r.�a�i�`� �r �.. � _ � t� '� s ,; -� `�;�` � �n �" �`� � #� �,� � � �►� �� "'� �.._� � � � � � � �� ,- " � � � � ,;`'��`;_ .��s�`�'�� : �" ':a�� ' +r�. ..� �',y�„ z� �a.� �E,;r„k�.��s � � . ��:s ��, ;F �+! ��`",,.� �j:. � � -'��4.,+ - '"s a "*yads�' ir91� � � ��.:r�,.. �: �. � ,+�b q?c , �� ,,�`,,�� ` � : � � > �� ,� ,� 7 '��'�—�+�w�� ,�:. �_ ,�'s�"�, � � s , � `�� r — { � ' �`�''°" � �`�.� �� 1;�� ' _ � �,�4 ;� - �,�' �'� �s� 3 , � '`�C �` y,t � k�'� � ' � z.- .�' ;��M � .. � � � " __F � VE`. ilt .. , . �, w ': 9 . �{„ ,�; t�� a ,tT w _. �' ��. t � � .r �i r �.s:n '_ ra � � . �f��.' � � ''�'�"a�� a � ,� � � S' � � #P � � ,� T,. � ��,e�. H .t� . �� ,,� 'ir' �� 1 � a 't� a � �.� s'},` � • '1�i, 'w h� a a' F1�� '`��r'g ".,,�";-� �`'+��a�. �'y�,� a} . � � �$e a � �� .�' �b� �� .. �v ��C ,�` d �� '�.,'� �p� �� j � . . `�' � ��4 � �.t.u�H��r �"t ' � 't` �' ' �. i+.t' �,� �� .h �,r ..anA4��e��...��3"x§�k F�. . 1 j,;� � 99 �. ..� ��. �t _ ,. � ,�. .� �.n` f� -� �. � � ��€E�i�, t,w� �`+p a"'a 1r � � � � � s,�q�y „� �� `' , ti �,� � 'Il ��Tr `^•• �`� v�' �" �, 7-�``` � •� " � � .� �, � �`��.� .� . � .� . , ' � x ��xi'��'��,�.:�,;.. ��` r� .�s � . � � �� , . . � � �... � � � x ,rP�w.�. c ^ fi v�a � � , . . P�' ik� _ �' ' r '� ;�r�6.� 5 �. "Ni+(j, .t . . . ,�-'R i .. . ,��s �' � {,,,� � y,;�'a ��` r��' �� '�`��` �+ ��y. 3 �`` ��' � .� � � r �� . ��- _ ��+...�.. 7' ,��' �P �_.,ll i �•�� l. �,�1' ' '�h��.W . ',.��. �� i : qa. �� '. 4 SS :: !.� ��y,� A" .. ,� ��' ��r�� .; �� — � �� . � � :_ � � . �� '�-�w� �; �t��'.��'!�`�f�l� � �'�`' � _ _ �`� �± � � '�* +�' * �, ,�+,.i � � ��`��"!��* , �;;�3 y�, �„ � _ ,��c,•r ��.,...�. �.�-� ��'ii�r� ."�;��,,,. �r.a � - - rs �r �'��Ili� . ..R�51F��'�1�� '.. �>d� �L! .;� ` �� .� �"* . ,� � R'�� '� � s� ` �'-,�� „� �il�� ,r—�„� � � 3' �. ,� �,� �:'� ' y�j� �� `•.. ,� �'♦'�-� ,..�� - - �.- � �'•�� .,�t'a�' �a�. ��r�`'�t3�i�� L� l�`�`�� .��"•. :_�7��` 4.., �a ��W�' �� ^ ��ry,Wt�"'�� s?: �-� `� ,,y� „ �, � � �� _. ..� �,�,� . . !�,..�1 �,�� .�t'i`��,!'��._ ��'.�� ,��-°�+ t�X.�i�;�".'c'� '"+i�"F'�' ��G �„��_��s � � t + f ..�� .�? i .� �t, �'."' '�f, '� `� ,a ' � . a< �*1� � .�% ` �a ; � � �,y �' '� �� R�'��1,�`' � . �4's��R��: ��p. � r �� f;� �� 3� ' � �� :.�� s..� r.�*,i �" "'" ��; ,�.:. k �`�� `�:� Wy!,:� ...,�n , ��`r �� i::`y � -�� :,�"��+1 f'�� +�y � �,., �'T s � ;� e� �s., �A� ' "�'' �"_` �� i'�`'�t� ��' �'.{ " "� � �� '�� `= �' �� i� � �,.�� g �, � �' �� '�; � �. ` i�r � r —�" -� �. _.• � :� �F r� � � � 3 3 ° � � � � �s� � � ��"'��if�.�+i s � ��?��lR.�t:i s � '�.� '4Y�}`�� - �� , f .,� H'��{� ��, , � -� s ,,� � *+��` ,�+�; �� > �' � '�u� fs �5 '�� -kr�' m�' �at�� .,�r��' �. vv.�r�.-''~ p.i` � �� w`a �.��i3 ,t,,,�`� < ,� � , �� .� �,.� �� ;�" � ''� . a � � ,. `��1�' - �`.��y 1 ��,�'�' �►,t�.��i� �/ '� �, '''� �, �►� #,, v y ,, p`5� ��s� r ��^' :i$ '��t� •'� � _-r . �f 7t��F'� '� �l-� . � ��1 ��. CU::d �� "`Y � .Ru v.._� F ��YkJ.'Y �� rq�-�,p�� y'f��' �re� Zty�,�,�,�.��: �� r":��, ��,�', ' ��..� . � . �� 4��,�, � �� s��+��,, �, 1 ��i �'�},'�`�� oY`p`. �,�"�' �� 7�/ r � � �.,� s, # ` ^�. 7 �, '�r` a � '� 1K v�,' � ♦� �' \C. a l. -� ��,�t�,�� G'��,��,�� .,�j ' � �s,' �� !e "� - y1 'z '� '� {b Ar .ry� ] � �'�� 1 �� ,`... , � �� '.'S '� � �� _ �.'�� *�' � a ��Y �� • �.-, �� M�� '�' � . - «"� F.-.��3F.{�.' �� + �y�.�� fi� ��:�� ;��,��. �:� �� rt �� E� ��, �� „+'`t �► y"k :� u`.u:- ,� 'L 'a .et �'�.'�.�. jifj,�� , �. � a HSY�:�etXW� �"�,�' _-� �� -�+`,�,� � �r� � �;,� �� ` � i��- �'� . � � .� .� ,.. ,� , �� _ � , h _ ��,��..� . � �"":;:�� .,�� ! � . .�, �� i +� �i�,__. >. _ ' . :A�lM�' •'��... .�-..�, -�-i � ;� ,,..�� t:�� ,._�_ r � � � � ' � � � � � � 1 • 11 11 � � � ....�..�:.,:.��:;, � �:-: • � �- � . • . .• . �� -� .� • � � • �� . •-� � • ' FISCAL ANALYSIS SHEET FOR MERRITT EXPANDED ANNEXATION -2 Units Po ulation AV Existin dev. 54 135 $14,860,621 Full dev. 96 240 $35,860,621 Assumptions: 2.5 persons/household $500,000 AV/new unit ................... $176,800 AV/existing unit ................... F{�v��i�j�;s.:::::::::::::: Total revenues ................... ................... .................... Existin Full Rate Existing::::�::::::::$�3;��Q;#6: Re ular le $46,960 $113,320 3.16 Full:::::::;::$'€��;��S:A'�: Excess le $1,317 $3,179 0.08865 State shared revenues Rate er ca Existin Full Li uor tax $3.52 $475.20 $844.80 Li uor Board rofits $5.04 $680.40 $1,209.60 Fuel tax-roads $14.46 $1,952.10 $3,470.40 Fuel tax-arterials $6.47 $873.45 $1,552.80 MVET $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cam er excise $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Criminal "ustice $0.36 $48.60 $86.40 Total $4,029.75 $7,164.00 Miscellaneous revenues Rate Existin Full Real estate excise" $40.86 $5,516.10 $9,806.40 Utili tax•" $133.20 $7,192.80 $12,787.20 Fines &forfeits" $18.33 $2,474.c5 $4,399.20 Total $15,183.45 $26,992.80 " Per capita *" Per housing unit- based on $2,220 annual utility billing @ 6% tax rate '�Qst�;:;:�:::::::::::::::: Total ongoing costs � � Perca ita Existin Full Existing:::;::::::::?�i6$;�$�;:��: Contracted Services Full::::�:::::$��;68$:7Q: Alcohol $0.23 $30.65 $54.48 Public Defender $3.13 $423.09 $752.16 Jail $7.19 $970.92 $1,726.08 Subtotal $1,424.66 $2,532.72 Court/le al/admin. $57.08 $7,705.80 $13,699.20 Parks maintenance# $14.90 $2,011.50 $3,576.00 Police $282.00 $38,070.00 $67,680.00 Road maintenance*'` N/A $500.00 $15,375 Fire`'`'' $1.25 $18,575.78 $44,825.78 Total $68,287.73 $147,688.70 *See Sheet Parks FIA � **See Sheet Roads FIA **" Rate per$1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) Net fiscal impact `***$282/service call - .92 calls/MF& .74 calls/SF Existin �� 7..:.::::,:_: 9::::::::::::::::�::�;:8T v� Full :":::':::::::�2;��:�'� .1....................: C3iie�ttili�:Cosf�::Parks acquisition &development(from Sheet Parks FIA): $79,828.00 $79,828.00 Other one-time costs: $0.00 0 Total one-time costs::::::::::::::$7�i;82$:�1Q: Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF RENTON— MERRITT II ANNEXATION FILE NO. 2178 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY will hold a public hearing at the hour of 7:00 PM on Wednesday, November 3, 2004. The hearing will take place at the Sierra Heights Elementary School, 9901 132°�Avenue SE, Renton WA. The purpose of the hearing is to consider potential proposed annexation to the City of Renton of an area know as "Merritt II Annexation," all in King County, Washington and more generally described as: The west 548 feet of Government Lot 1 in Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, Less the north 744.708 feet thereof; TOGETHER WITH Lot 2 of King County Short Plat No. 6770077, as recorder under King County Recording No. 7712090795, said Lot 2 being a portion of Government Lot 2 in said Section 3; and TOGETHER WITH the east one quarter (1/4) of said Government Lot 2, and that portion of the east one quarter (1/4) of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 34, Township 24 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying southerly of a line which begins at a point 90 feet north of the southeast corner of said subdivision and ends at a point 200 feet north of the southwest corner of said subdivision. A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS ON FILE AND AVAILABLE AT THE OFFICE OF THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD. The Boundary Review Board conducts all meetings and hearings in locations that are wheelchair accessible. Any person requiring other disability accommodations or special assistance should contact the Boundary Review Board staff at least two business days prior to the meeting. The Boundary Review Board telephone is 206-296-6800. For TTY telephone services, please call 206- 296-1024 Each request for accommodations or assistance will be considered individually according to the type of request, the availability of resources and the fmancial abiliry of the Board to provide the requested services or equipment. DATED at Seattle, Washington, this 28th day of September 2004. WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary 10/21i2004 THU 12:01 FAX 2062966803 Boundary Revie�� Board �002 `�' �2�CE1��' �% King Cour�ty OCT `? 1 2004 Office o+f Manageme�t &Budget {hlp5tste�ound�y Revt�w King County Cuurthouse gp2rG Foc Ki�9�°� 516 7hird Avenue, Room 420 Seattle, WA 99104-3z7� October 21, 2004 MEMORANDUM TO: Lenora Blauman,Exccutive Secretary, Was � gton State Boundary Review Board for King Couniy FR: Mike�"homas, Sr. Policy Analyst RE: MERRITT II Annexation Attached please find writtez�comznents prepared by Kin� County's Office of Management an,d Budget concerning the ciry of Renton's Nlezritt IZ annexation proposal. Please feel �ree to contact my office at (206)205-0720 if you should have any queslions. Thank you for your assistance on lhis maltc;r. ��Yh4M 10/21/2004 THU 12:01 FAX 2062966803 Boundary Revie�v Board �003 REPOR'�TO '�H� WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVTE'VV BOAl2D OF KING COUNT'Y' �1�1 THE MATTER O�''I'N� C1TY OF RENTON'S ME�tR��'T II ANNEXATYON Boundary Review Board File No. 2178 November 3, 2004 public Hearing I. BA,CKGROUND On July �3, 2004,the King Counfiy Office of Management and Budget("OMB'� reccived fi-om the Washington State Bouz�dary Review Board for Kit�g County("BRB'� n Notice of Intent (`NOI'� for the.N�erritt II annexation. The azuxexation as proposed wouJd sdd approximately 20 acres of land to the northeast comer of the city of Renton("City"). Qn August 27,2004, fo��owing an extensive review of the annexation proposal, King County Executive Ron Sims p�rovided timely notice as allowed �or in RCW 36.93.100(2)to the Boundary Review Board ("BRB")requesting the BRB invoke ils jurisciiction and review thc City's proposed Merritt II annexation ("Annexation"). II. COMMUNITY BACT�G�Z.OUND AND ANNE7�AT,CON .P�2.OPOSAL Tt�e Memtt II annexation is located in one to two remaiiung unincorporated islands which exist south of the May Creek corridor along the inti:rface between the C'�ty's East Renton Plateau potential annexation area("PAA'� and the city of Newcastle's southerly corporate boundary. The uniz�corporated island in which the subject annexation is located is 115 acres in size and is bisected by May C`reek. The May Creek corridor servcs as d regionally recognized and designated Urban Sepaxator.' As such, the City is required to protcct the separator by applyin; low density zoning(R-1) through the twenty year planning cycle of the Countywide Pla�ning Policies. Tk�ough designated as R-1 zoning(une dwelling unit per acre) this area has development potential as it is comprised of multi-acre parcels. Annexations in this and other unincorporated pockzts of lhe Eas�Rez�ton Plateau PAA is primarily developznent driven. The by-product of these numerous and relatively small annexations( 5 to 20 acresj is a very convoluted municipal boundary complete with odd shaped cul-de-sacs of urba�unincorporated land wllich jut ia�to the incorporated area. The subject area is no exception as it is one of the last reznaining rernnants between the cities ofRenton and Newcastle. Ihis presents service and otl�er challenges for both the Ctity and the County. ' Counrywide Planning Policy LU-27 states:Urban separators arc]ow-density areas or areas of lirtle developmrnt with thc iuban gowth area(UGfi). C)rban separators shall be d�ned as permsncnt low-density lands which protect adjaccnt resource lands,iwal aAcas,auQ envirunmcntally censitive areas and create opc,�n space corridozs�vithin and bctwcen urhan areas which providc rnvironmcntal,vlsual,recreational and wildlife be��e�ts, Mcrritt Armcxation BRR FiJe No.2178 Pagc 1 of 7 10i21�2004 THU 12:01 FAX 2062966803 Boundary Revie�r Board C�004 The Anne�cation, a 50/50 p�tition method annexation as allowcd for under RCW 35A.14.120, proposcs to annex 20 of the 115 acres; ef�ectively taking a portion of thc easterly p2rt ofthe unincorporated island, coming�vithin onc lot(adjacent to May Valley road) of cutting lhe entire island in half. lil. CONSISI'�NC'Y WITH STAT� GRO�V'TH MANAGEMENT ACT AND COUNxYWIDE PLANNXNG POLICIES State law(RCW 36.93.157) stipulates that T3RB decisions must be consistez�t with three sections of the state's growth managemex�t act("GMA"): planu�ing goals, urban�owth areas and county�vzde planning policies. The County�nds the�lnncxation violates the policy intent ofthe Co�mtywide Planning Policies. a. Plannin� Goa1s: Both the City and the County have adopted comprehensive lar�d use plans as requzred by GMA. Each of ihese plans have been deemed to be consistenl with the CYMA by the state department of Community, Trade and Economic Development as they support the Act's various goals which include arnong other things planning for urban growth,reduction of sprawl,housing, tran�sportation, and open space and recreatzon. Both the county's and the eity's comprehensive land use plans are consistent with the adopted Countywide e,-' �lanning Po]icies2. b. Urban Growth 1lreas: The city, through the countywide planning process, has adopted a�Sotential annexation area, which inciudes the entirety of the subject area. This designation signals tl�e city's intent to annex and provide urban levels =- o�development and services. e. Count ide Plannin�Policies: King Coumy, through ratificcation of its cities, ado�ted CPPs (phase II) in 1994. The CP�'s are part of a hieraxchy of substantive an.d directive policy. Direction flows first hom the CPPs to the comprehensi�e plans of cities and counties, whieh in turn provide subsiantive direction to thc eontent of local land use regulations,which govem the exercise of local land use power. One of the primary purposes of the CP�'s is to 'facilitate the transformation oJlacal goverr�ance in the urban growth area so that urban governmen.ta.l services are provided by cities and rural und regional services are prnvided hy counties" [CYSf-�, Snoqualmie,2304c, FAO]. In addition to dcfining service provision responsibility, the CPPs stxpulate that development must be directed to tuban areas thereby raducing thc opportunity for sprawl. Although the CPPs call for planned and ordezly growth in the urban and urban unincorporated areas of the county(CPP LU-26, -28, -31), the Annexation is _representative of what l�as historically occurred and what eontinues to occuz in thc urban unincozporaLe�i areas- annexation tei�ds to bc development driven. Thcrc 2 The consis�ency required becwecn RCW 36.70A.100 and ItCW 3C.70A.210 is an cxt�rnal consistency betwecn comTue.bensive plans. The CPPs do not speak dircctly to the implementing land usc rcgulations o.f cities and countics. [GPSFX�,Snoqualmie,2304c,�T�O]. :vlcrritt Annexation BRB File No.2178 Page 2 of 7 10/21/2004 THti 12:02 Fr1X 2062966803 Boundary Revie�v Board f�005 aure several negative implications for this ciefauli approach: first,annexation occurs at a slow and incremental pace, typica��y resulting in add configurations which present challenges for cow�ty and city service providcr alike; second, due to the pace of annexations3 it becomes increasingly difficult for the cowzty to provide services to a patchwork of unincorporated areas sirung throu�hout the county; and third,the residents ofthe unincorporated area contiz►ue to receive county levels of sezvice (a�oLv in si��ificant dacline due to budget constraints) even thoudh they are located within the urban area. The Annexation would be consisleni wilh the inLenl of the CpPs if il included the entire unincorporated island. Znstead, this proposal fails to take the simple step of addressing the needs oFthe entire community thxt can be accomplished throu�h complete annexation of the island. iV. CONSISTENCY WITH BOUNDARY REVI�W BOAl� F'AC'!'O�2.S ANn OB.�Cxz'V�S In addition to reviewing art annexation prop�sal f�r consistency�vith state GMA, Countywide Plaz�ing�olicies, and the King County Comprehensive Plan,thc BRB must also evaluate it based on the set of nine objectives set fozth in RCW 36.93.180. In doing so, the BRB may consider a host of factors (RCW 36.93.170)which include but are not limited to land use, population,provision of municipal sezvices, cost o�local services, economics, and dcvelopment regulations. Below are listed the objectives set forth in RCW 36.93.180 along with analysis to determine if each of these objectives is met by the current proposal,and if not,which ones are hindered. A final assessment is made to see if, overall, the objectives tivere furtheTed by the proposal. Objectives: X. Preservation ofnatural nei�hborhoods and communities. The proposed annexation splits a relatively small unincorporated area by jurisdictional boundaries. The City's inclusion of this entire area within a P�1.A sets the expectation for the residents that one day they will be annexed by the City. The NOY lacks any reference or discussion re�arding a subsee�uenl annexation(s) that w�ould incorporate the remainder. Conscquently, thc fate of those residents that the Annexation would leave behind is unknown. T1�e current laxid use designation undez the County is Residential(R-1)which allows for 1 unit pe�r acre. The City will continue R-1 zoning because af the iJrban separator. While the zoning density will not be affected by annexation, each jurisdiction has its own ►,,,;que set of development standards (drainage xequirerr�ents, setbacks,hei�,t, etc_)_ Therefore, the Annexation creates the possibility that the community will be developed 3 Appruxunately 70,OU0 residzncs have been incorporatod 'uzto cities since 1990 while ncarly 2�2,000 residcnts havc become incorporated through newly formed cities. Thexe aze approximately 218,000 residenu in urban �uuncorporated King Counry. Based on the pace of aimexation ovcr the past severa]ycars,it takc anothcr 20-25 years to accomplish annexarion of thc entire iaban unincotporated area;welt ra,ct the 2012 GPP plannang horizon. Mcrritl Anncxation BRB File No.2178 k�age 3 of 7 10�21/2004 THU 12:02 FAX 206296680� Boundary Reviefv Board �J006 under two different sets of land use regulations so long as part of the island remains in unincorporated status. xl�i.s could lead to visual a��d infrastructure differences within the community. Preservation of the community ean be achieved by annexing all of the cor�rr�uz�ity at one time. This will ensure common governance anci the uniform application of a single set of dcvelopmenl regulations and land use designations. The anne�catio� as proposcd does not naeet or furtber this objective. 2. Use of physical boundaries, includzng but not limited to bodies of water, hi�hways, and land contours. The proposed annexat�on relies on properiy lincs for its definition and does not use physical boundaries such as streets,water ways, etc. except for a narrow connection to Lyons Avenue. The ant:Pxation as proposed does not meet or furtl�er this objective_ 3_ Creation and�reservation of logical scrvice azeas. The fra�nentation of the Annexation area would complicate a�i already complicated local service pzovision scenario. Ihe area is small and relatively isolated from adjoining urban unincorporated areas such as the 166 acre urban island to the west, or rural areas where the county is also providing local scrvices. This tends to�ncrease the cost ofproviding srrviccs, namely sheriff and roads services, and it rreates th�potential for confusion during times of emergency. In eFfect,neighbors across the st�reet from each other would have to call different agencies for an emergency response or service. Though cuzrez�t residcnts may know whether to call the city or the county during such a situation because they posses historical annexation knowledge,new residents likely wil�not_ The consequences of this scenario could be dire during storms and calls for emergency response. ln addition to the logistics of service provision, the cost of it must also be considered. Therc are two cost considerations for the County: first, as the urban unincorporated area continues to fra�nent via annexation, the cost of services does not r�ecessa.rily immediately go down. T'he more dispersed these arcas become,the greater the cost in timc and travcl; and sccond, the County's abilzty to afford services has been seriously jeopardized by the increased eost of services, economic recession, and voter appzoved initiatives. It has now been well docwment that the County has limited financial resources to provide local goveznment scrviccs`�. As noted above,both the CrMA and the CPPs designate cities as tl�e lo�ical provider of urban scrvices. Cities have been a£�ozded by the state legislature taxing authority unique from the counties: unlike comzties, cities have both business and occupations tax and utility tax authority to support the provision of local urban services. Consequently, cities are bcttcr ablc to provide a broader arxay of services synonymous with urban areas tha�� °RudEet Advicc�ry Tack Porct:Report of thc King County General Governznent Budg�t Advisory Task Force to Executivc Ron Sims,Junc 25,2003. Mrrritt Anncx.:ition EFE Filc No.217s Page 4 of 7 l0/21�2004 THU 12:03 FAX 2062966803 Boundary Revie�� Board f�007 can is the county. The longer these urban arcas rcmain waincorporated, the more di�cult it becomes Financially for the County to provide local services while at the sa.zz�c time !'ullilling it re�ional service and rural service responsibilities_ �'fie annezarion as proposed does not nceet or further t1�is objective. 4_ �zevention of abnormally�z�egular boundaries. The Annexatio�z creates a series of irred lar boundaries. Such boundaries, as notcd above, make it di�f'icult to provide services and for residents to zdentify which jurisdiction they reside within. The annexafion as proposed does not nreet or jurtl:er ihis objectfve. 5. Discoura�ement ofmultiple incorporations. The County determines that this objective is neither furtherec� nor hindered by the az�t�exatioa because it has no applicatio� to this proposal. 6. Dissolution of inactave sQecial purpose districts. The County determi�aes that this objective is neither far-thered nor hindered by the annexation because it has no applic�tion to this proposal. 7. Adjustment of impractical boundazies_ � The annexation as proposed does�ot adjust or normalize impractical boundaries. To the contrary, it creates impractical boundaries. Trie aaa�aesation as propvsed does not meet or further this objective. 8. Incorporation of citaes or towns or annexatian to cities or iowns of unincozporated areas which are urban in charactcr. The proposed annexation area, and for that mat�er the entire urban unincorporated island is urban and is localcd within the County's desi�n,ated urban growth area. Though designated by the county as low density commensurate with the urban separator designation,thc city to further this objective would have to take the entire unincorporatcd island. The annexation proposed neither furthers nor hinders this objertive. 9. Protection of a�-icultural and urban lands. xb�e County determines that this ob�ective is neitber furthered nor hindered by the annexation because it has no application to this pro�osal. in sum,the annexation proposal fails to meet or further objectives 1-4 and 7. Objective 8 neither furthezs nor hinders, and objectives 5,6 and 9 are not applicable to this proposal. Thus, in weighing all of the BRB objectives, thcre is evidence to support the conclusion lhdt the annexation as pmposal fails to meet the znajority of the BRB objectives_ ,However, if modified to inclt�ded ihe entire urban unincorporated island, the azuaexation proposal could then be deemed to be consistent wiih ihc BRB objectives. Merritt Anncxation BRB File No.2178 Page 5 of 7 10/21�2004 THU 12:03 FAX 2062966803 Boundary Revie�� Board f�008 V. CONCLUSTON During its review of annexation proposais,the County must perfozm a unique balancing act. �TJhile it actively works ioward the implemen.tarion of state (RCW 36.70A.110)and countywide planning policy(FW-12, LU-28, LU-31) goals which recod izes that cities are the focal poin:u of growth,urban service provision, and governance within the UGA(Assoc. of 12ural R�sidents v. Kitsap Co. CPSGPHB Case No. 53-3-0010), it rnust at the same time try to ensure that a given annexation proposal does not create an undue financial and/or service burden on the County/res�dents or jeopardize the ability of the remaining urban unincorporated cilizens to one day become part of a city. The City is ready to assume this area and provide an acceptable level of urban services.Though prepared, the city has tcndered an annexatioa�proposal that takes in on�y 20 of the 115 acres. It appears that the city's proposecl ancaexation is premised on the notion that some ar�nexation of tkie community is preferable to none. This presents the County as well as the residents with the dilernma of determining whether ihe benefits of a partial aiu�.exation outweigh the benefits of no annexation occurring until such time as the entire axea can be annexed. Based on the arguments set forth in this document and the conclusions listed below,the County finds that anne�ation of the entirety of Annexation area is in the best interest o�all partics: 1. A PAA.desi�ation geographically represents the future intention of a city. It alone does not pzovide a city license to annex area.� within its PAA without question. The existence of RCW 36.93.170 ancl 180 illustrates tlaat the BRB has statutory authority to wei�the benerts and impacts af a given annexation proposal. 2. The Aiviexation does not further tlae governance transition of the comm�uuty from urban uzaincorporated to incorporated as envisioned by the regionally adoptcd Cou�tywidc Platu�ing Policies. �hhereys�no rdiscussion of a subsequent annexation(s). Consequenily,it is unclear as _._ ... .. , .._ to when or if the city�vill propose annexation of the remainder of the area. This effecfively leaves the remaining residents with an unclear governance future. 3. Thc city has planned for and is able to provide a full compliznent of urba�services to the annexation axea, including water, sewer, fire,police, �d surface water management. The �o�ty�5�,flt. 4. Pursuant to GMA and CP�'Policy, cities aze the logical provider of urban services and the counties are the logical provider of re�onal and local services within the rural area. 5. Cities have the taxing aiithority necessary to extend and provide urban lcvels of service to uzban unincorporated areas. 6. Partial annexation sets the stage for dif�'erent development standards witl�in the same community which could leaci lo incompatible visual and infrastructurc dcvelopment. 7. Partial annexaiion is contrary to the intent of tk�e CPPs. (vlerTitt Anncxation f312B File No.2178 Pagr 6 of 7 10/21/2004 THU 12:03 FAX 2062966803 Boundary Revie�s� Board �]009 8. King County Comprehensive Plan policies U-201 and U-206 strongly support annexation of the urban �owlh area. 'VT_ REQUEST State law (RCW 36.93.160) authorizes the BRB to: 1) approve the anncxation proposal as submitted, 2) deny the annexation, or 3)modify the annexation proposal by adding or deleting tez-ricory and approve as zzaodified_ '�'he County respectfully puts forth the following rcquest to the BRB for its consideration: The County requests that the BRB modify the Anncxation to include the entire community; specially all of the temtory within the 115 acre urban unincorporated island as depictecl in exhibit Fl to the City's NOI. Or that area bounded by SE May Valley Road to the north; Newcastle Road to the west; SE 100�'Placc to the south; and, Lyons Avenue to the east. Merritt A�exation BRB File No. 2178 Pave 7 qf 7 , , EXHIBIT C �----,_ � : ��,-�� __`��::._;.Y�:: Department of Assessments Scott Noble King County Adminislration Bldg. Assess��• 500 Fourth Avenue,Room 708 Seattle,WA 98104-2384 (20�296-5195 FAX(20�296-0595 Email:assessor.info�ajnetrokc.gov www.m et rokc.S ov/assess o r/ ANNEXATION PETITION CERTIFICATION THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition submitted February 11, 2004 to the King County Department of Assessments by Don Erickson, Senior Planner for the City of Renton, supporting the annexation to Renton of the properties described as the Merritt II Annexation, has been examined, the property taxpayers, tax parcel numbers, assessed value, and acreage of properties listed thereon carefully compared with the King County tax roll records, and as a result of such examination, found to be sufficient under the provisions of the New Section of Revised Code of Washington, Section 35.13.002. The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signature on the petition is valid through comparison with any record of acival signatures, nor that the signature was obtained or submitted in an appropriate time frame, and this document does not certify such to be the case. Dated this 19� day of February, 2004 ��'�►----�—�.�..,.�. Scott Noble, Ki County Assessor g.0+�1202M U : • +..,:.!,y,at':C,Xr.f.'i.•.'si,::.r��.d'. .- 'a.l.Yi.F.i,iw'..!i:Li//-d"19:�::+"':i.'.�d%.�i'.'eb'ib:.t.'di,:I.�"�"�.::�iX/;f.,;sif';r'f.:n.'.s;+:,f"r.:'n'./i:%rt),.vCG/.';,.S�..N:F/F:&v:d^/J/�,.Miid%ds/.E;'�.1E;�.A//i.16'/�iB'/�,d/.Ci/:�G� . -,:..e EXHIBIT C ; . . King County Records, Elections and Licensing Services Division 0 � ¢ ; 6 PETITION CERTIFICA TIDN THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition, submitted February 13, 2004 to the King County Records, Elections and Licensing Services Division, concerning a proposed 6 % 's annexation into the City of Renton of the area known as Merritt II, has been examined, the signatures thereon carefully compared with the voter registration ' ; records of the King County Elections Section, and as a result of such examination, � signatures of a majority of the registered voters of the area were found upon the �, petition, thus the petition is found to be sufficient under the provisions of the Revised � :� Code of Washington. f ✓ Y r° � 4 F Dated this 26`h day of March 2004. > ' i > i C f , r �° __ �_ _ i Dean r'. Logan, Di c � � fi s s fm]/pet-cert.doc , �,.s�ri s;a;.;e ii.i�.riri✓i.iisir a s,.�,n✓i.iuisir�iarrr s iix�i.�,vrsi<,,is�.aaii:i.�is yr.r��isir�r iir.%,4,r.vi..�.�;r�s�iirr.iiv i irir r sidrxrriui e.s.rrf-raii ristaievsrr.ut�o�rii EXHIBIT D MERRITT II ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION The west 548 feet of Government Lot 1 in Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, LESS the North 744.708 feet thereof; TOGETHER WITH Lot 2 of King County Short Plat No. 677007, as recorded under King County Recording No. 7712090795, said Lot 2 being a portion of Government Lot 2 in said Section 3; and TOGETHER WITH the east one quarter(1/4) of said Government Lot 2, and that portion of the east one quarter (1/4) of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 34, Township 24 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying southerly of a line which begins at a point 90 feet north of the southeast corner of said subdivision and ends at a point 200 feet north of the southwest corner of said subdivision. � EXHIBIT E See attached exhibits(2)in separate envelope S� agtih , , � a �� _ 0 r � �� S s w � Q w � � � a � � SE 95f s o M0y �alleY Rd 9`Sf z a �O` y '�""k � � Q t E � 0 � th Ct t t 0 4 N E 10 nd d � > � 2 � � Go/ S 4th St, y� < � � t � a � � � °' O`n v � '^i QJ P � P� O � �� w � Z •� o ��J ��a Q `�' � 5e C� �sso9�oh Rd Su�S ' Q' N� Q C w z �� > � E 1 { 7 Q � O S = � � � � T St Proposed Merritt Annexation o loo0 2000 Exhibit F1: Proposed Annexation Boundary U��Y o,,� Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning 1 : 12000 ��+ Alex Pietsch,Administrator ___ Renton City Limits „�, ,$ G.Del Rosario � Proposed Annexation Area �'N.TO 251une2003 - - - `= -_ _ ` _ __ C7 0 CJ Proposed Merritt Annexation o S000 l0000 Exhibit F2: Existing Corporate Limits 1 : 60000 Uti�Y �„{, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning � � � Alex Pietsch,Aam�n�st�cor --- Renton City Limits G.Del Rosario 0 Proposed Annexation Area ��NZO� 25 June 2003 _ \ � AKE BOIIEN � V i qi - - _ �,s��ik . - - LhK6 WASF{IPX37ON W�e.. L� 0 � - 90� �'cy� 2�" A � - - A ' A ry `c Z E Z O Am� Ne am-�. s�i2e s� I ' '� M A�S Air orl Wa NE�d C� , °fM�'n�km � '�, S 2nd St .y �i�� qR �� y4 s�o �w� q�a F° SW 7ih St � ��Y WaY n � , SW Rmton Yllog g I � � 6 � �nc�m(4 &� oy4, I ti Q° ' TuM�ia kwy N 81 167 Y � Strander Blvtl ' � � "�¢" N - � - 515 s � _ a SW 34th St '� z Pelroetsky Rd ii � SW 41st 5t. I 5 1BOth v S�79t ', SW 43rd SL 5 4 � �n I �S` � a � i I� ' � � _ __-__ _ F I 3 � �, PANTNERLAKE --'- ---- I, �Q� _ _ ___ ¢' � e ,��095 _ __ __ _ � - -__-___-___ y`.�' - I.AKG-YO[iN['S - _- Proposed Merritt Annexation o S000 l0000 Exhibit F3: Major Streets and Major Physical Features 1 : 60000 TY ti O�,t, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning � � * Alex Pietsch,.aam�n�st�to� --- Renton City Limits G.Del Rosario � Proposed Annexation Area ��N•r0$ 25 June 2003 � STATION 12 � ' S ATION � � 11 � ' �� STATION 16 STATION '� 13 , STATION 14 . Proposed Merritt Annexation o S000 l0000 Exhibit F4a: Fire Service Boundaries 1 : 60000 G1�Y o� Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning �O� Alex Pietsch,Aam�n�st�to� --- Renton City Limits G.Del Rosario � Proposed Annexation Area ANT�$ 25 June 2003 ! �� O �� Proposed Merritt Annexation o S000 l0000 Exhibit F4b: Sewer Service Boundaries 1 : 60000 Uti�Y ,�, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning + � 4 Alex Pietsch,Aam�n�sc�cor --- Renton City Limits �, ,$ G.Del Rosario � Proposed Annexation Area �NTO 25 June 2003 . � COAL CREEK WATER & SEWER DIST. 1ns�oo� BRYN MAWR - C� LAKERIDGE WATER 8 SEWER DIST. vh,�o� SKYWAY WATER WATER DISTRKT 90 , AND SEWER DISTRICT p an-n+�l SeATrtt A,��. �,,� C� ', WAT9t 09T. (7�am4 ASMFfA� �, w.in sme. �x.A w�nEw000�ornaw ' WA79 COp9A71VF , Q51'7719) CITY � CEDAR RIVER TUKWLA WATER AND ' SEWBt DIST. ' r.,a.w� psseva� e S�S �� ; WATER APO , SEWBt DISTRKT a�ffic CITY � KENT � �� Proposed Merritt Annexation 0 4500 9000 Exhibit F4c: Water Service Area Boundaries 1 : 54000 Gti�Y o,,{, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning � � � Alex Pietsch,Aam�n�st�cor --- Renton City Limits G.Del Rosario �� Proposed Annexation Area ��N.pO� 25 June 2003 � , ____=` == a_:______ `_ =` =__ •� _____________ ________________ --__ �'� - - --- = � �-- - --____ �J � _ _-___ _-_- -_ y'K _________-__ � ' I �� 1 ' a � 1 �� L. • • I ��,_,_,� —'I I 1 I 1 �--•� .� � �•�.� _ � � �.� r•—•: �.�y % �.,� �'_'—'—� �._._.� � I� r•—•—•--•—•—•� `� �'� � � �� ` �j � i< r --•—•— � � I \ ( j '"�� . .J r—•� �r I I i.� r—•— � Proposed Merritt Annexation o S000 l0000 Exhibit F5: K.C. UGA and Renton PAA 1 : 60000 ti�Y o„{, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning � � � Alex Pietsch,Administrator --- Renton City Limits G.Del Rosario 0 Proposed Annexation Area ��NT�$ 25 June 2003 ' - - , a '`'=`- — ` _`> ' ' '_- _ '_ _ ` ->'>-_' �� C� Proposed Merritt Annexation o S000 l0000 Exhibit G: Proposed Corporate Limits 1 : 60000 Gti�Y �.,{, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning � � � Alex Pietsch,.aam;n�sc�ror --- Renton City Limits G.Del Rosario � Proposed Annexation Area ��'NTO$ 25 June 2003 ,•S1i::•�.i� i�::';.'•ii'=•:•J:.•':�••r� � '•'.;v��•.'y;;;�,�;':._C;•$;�;;;•;o'•�-a � ,�.� .:d•{:::;•:;i-�'}::;:'":• � • 3 r.y,... :•::. ::•:.-. _ � � � I,:�;: :��: _ � :'r':: :`;:; � {::,s L•: :1:. " •.•r.-. .T.- .r:; - ..�:. t - e•q,•, ':'i:' :��:5:. '�•f:•: ' - .�:.^...�.' J:ti: ' ..'..'. •::'}.`':'.'. .Y:. .l :•:1'.• ' :V. ' •:l: " :.f,.�. :••Ji. •'.•�.•.:�. P..'::' ',.:5'• _ •.S•'i:•:Y ' ' :.Y:.. __ :•:':. :•1.•: _ .f.� - •�`.j:• •�•l...f:::ti:;:;:�::':'::'::•::•.•.:�:��:.;.'.;.;:.: �•:l O . _ .. }:•:i1 ti'.L':•. :•}i. :`::•:•.��.`�. ' ::`:•�• :•:ti•.•:•::•:•:•:•:•:•::v:-.� ��:;:-::J:;::;. •:•.'.:•:•. 1...�p.� ld " " :'ti:• :.:'��i:'. }.`:•. :�.ti:• - " �'titi :�{{� �.ti. :,:;% ':ti✓�'�'�'�'�::::�{:�:•:;:}�{�i:•'r:•}:�:•:•:jr:•:j: �'�f.. �::•..?; �:•'r'.: - �'r'r'.•: :;:}ti; \ ;_;:i: - �:v•. - :;:;;;� �:•{'r: - �:;:�:;�� - �;';:•}}.�:•:�:;.v:7:yt: •'�.r'{ :!:�'�.'h ti�.;:�:{:!:;.�.5:�.•:'��.}�': \ .r ` ..'• .f: i�.�: - '.�: ::f�� :l.� ':J' .'Ji '}J:: ::S•: l:ti•: .,��i,�� •.�.''•i!i'.'i.i.•.��i��i.i�'i:�::`i'r'.!�•i�'i�'1Jr'��i•t.�i�'��:��':i.:•�.:'i.�':!�::.':.•�{:'.i:•.•.•1.. .•.��i�� :i�%i��.'i��..��'i�i::� ��r�.ri��i ��r�.......�...• .•.•.i'.•.::i i i�:.�.�•.::�i��.:''.�'.•.•.'.• •�'� :�J'. , � - ti:1:•:::.�•.�..:.:....::::.�.;,:.:.�:., . •�' '_ ..........��.ri�•:•. -.. . . .��.........�.. . •.. �.'�. .�,� _�, � � i ' . � � •`/•� . �� .� � �•. .,,,,,.,., ::r �i�u��-. ��i�ii:: ti :.�:: :ti. �ti. � �.ti. � � - ■ '•:tiv , , �� 1 ' .•�y' ■ , � � � � � C II � � �� tititi r-�- �� r ��c� -- �W � � � ✓ � - . I ,� 1 �1:: / . :�:;:: ■ .::: . � - . ♦ � r � � � , �AII �.� � �IA�!��I�II �:: , -- � • � w► �►� , , r�::= .� I� ► � �� v V�':: � . ':J:. I'. :J• _ � .J.: � � ' - �� '': � . " � - , � :!': , * . a ..... - . � - - - .. . r . � 1 �� `. ► . � � � . , I � . i . �:: . ■ � �- ��LII ♦ ..:: � � , � v / :::�:::::::::::::::::.::::�:::::::::::::::::::::_:::::::::..::::=::_::::: �IEt� nr_�A,��e ► �►� �:: ::ti: . . ::,� ..�. � � � : � . ::-��.:.::::::::�:��::::::::::::<::�::::::::::�::::::: � ;t��► / �:��:::��:;::�:�::::::-�:::::::�`��::::�.:.::.:..:.:..:.:.: �. YII�■a��i► •��, , �/�� .:: ..,.. ., ., � � �► � , ?:1:: ::=r:: ' _ � � ■ � ■ , .r.: ... ` � ..:: M ► � . , � ; r . � � _ .. � � � ___.�, � J� T � u •�:: ► ' %%i}:: :{4•} � � � � ' � � I � • � � " 1 �l � ' 1 T 1 • 1 � � ,r � - � -- - � � ' � ••'•�.•:•:•.::::::...:.•::�:•:�::•:::::•::•:::•: -� \ � ■''"., � ''�� : ::.:::::::. �:. ::f:::: .. �.. � :.:.:: ;;:1:: ::f::: � � .::;; :::;. �: ;.:::� :::f>�:: � � � .f. .f. � _ w . � ► .f.. e � ::r:: ' , •!� Yl.�� - ' - - �': ..1:' :'.t.'::{•:�ti:•: ..X:•':•:::•lVr�.��•�•�.� , _ � • " ..;.c;.�•��'ti'��rr..e..•..:'��:;.;.•..v.:v¢•.o•.•.r:•}:.•.:�:�:�$��''=�'':,:'�''':':. . �� ,. �� ca: ..•:::.:•:.::::..:•::::::::•:.:....•.•....•..:.•..•...,:..... ��,1 ■ .. ' ♦ . ...:.Y:....f::.•::1•::•:::•:::f.J;:::::.:•:::i:i:�:::::i:. _ �...f'J%�:::�:��:•{'i:•Y•�yi�•�•�•'��i.•:`:•:1.•.��':'i t:•:•:•.��;:�•:�:ti'}i'}l�'� � `�.� .,� ♦ �� .► y::::: ..:::...:::::....r...,...:.....::.............:......:.. . �+r � � � :� .A::.: ... ..: ..:. .... :::f.. . ■ . :';�:k;: '•:r�.�.•r�;: :::t4s,:•3 ,r,i,.•,. � �� ' ,.e. ;�i°v°r'•: :�•'{'rr'�•'i'e'�d.�:�::},�..,>'r'�:::�:�::;;I;r:r.�.:•;�;�::`,:��; �� ,"�� 1�'� .��:r�f Yfi'::,.,�' ��,.��' ,.,r..1r. ,�.s,�,:.;,.;.•:;:•:•:y..•.,.,:•.;.}>;%�:.y �� • �q;�„�+'ror••d.•.r�'J v��f r�•�.• �A f�.f�..•... ..r�s'��rleS: -- ,,-� ��_ � � I� s.r s�'.f:s....�.�.'�. ��•.'•.'•:i�3�.°�.:S•'•:s::�:�✓..si��•., . • , , / , ' I / � � � � � � .;�•: � 1 • I ' ' ' . � ' �' • . � �»::;•<:2<>::::•: ':: • 111 � • . � �- - .� - �� . . � . � � ' . .� �. . . • .�. -. � . . � - . � �� w .� PID TAXPAYER NAME ATTN LINE TAXPAYER ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP ' APRLANDVAL TAXLANOVAL APRIMPVAL TAXIMPVAL I SITUS ADDRESS ___ LAND SQfT 032305907308 ANDREWS MARI S 9808 143RD AV SE RENTON WA 98059 5268,000 5268,000 5489,000$< E489,0001 372,002 606110008008 BAILEV LEE S 18833 96TH AV NW STANWOOD WA 98292'� 527,000 527,000 EO EO 9,600 60614000� 6 BAIIEY LEE S 18833 96TH AV NW STANWOOD WA 98292 593,000 593,000 __ 5107,000 l E1 W,000 14711 SE t00TH PL 98055 9,840 606140010004 BAILEV LEE S 18833 98TH AV NW STANWOOD WA 98292 5z7.000 527.000 Ea SO 9,840 806140002001 BATES KARI J 10003 140TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 $27,000 $27,000 EO SO 8,379 032305924709 BLAVDEN ROBERT E&SHIRLEV _ PO BOX 3029 RENTON WA _ 98056� E224,000 b224,000 E230,000 5230,000 9933 143RD AV SE 98055 288,785 032305903802 BONWELI JAMES L*JUUE P 9876 746TH AV SE RENTON WA 98056' $122,000 E�z2.000 5151,000 E151,000 9616 746TH AV SE 98055 ___117,812 606740025002 80SS TRE G 14730 SE 100TH PL RENTON WA 98056 $98.000 E�.�W 5124,000� E124,000 14130 SE 100TH PL 98055 14,740 032305911807 BRANT DARRELL 9820 COAL CREEK PW RENTON WA 98059 586,000 E86.000 5150,000 4 E150,000 9820 COAL CREEK PW SE 98056 32,372 032305924808 BROUSSARD CIIFFORD H JR 14111 SE MAV VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98055 E7,000 51,000 EO $0 12,196 342405904703 BROUSSARD CLIFFORD H JR 1�i11 SE MAY VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98055 $208,000 $50,621 $779,000 5�79.000 14111 SE MAY VALLEV RD 98055 266,151 608140029004 BROUSSARD CLIFFORD H JR 74111 SE MAY VALLEY RD RENTON WA 980.55 556,000 $S6,OW 0 SO i 9,648 032305900204 BROUSSARD CIIFFORD H+JOHANN 14032 SE 100TH PL RENTON WA 98059� $220,000 E220,000 SO SO 275,734 606140030002 BROUSSARD CLIFFORD Hr�OHANN 11032 SE 100TH PL RENTON WA 98059� 556,000 558,000 SO EO 9,848 606140031000 BROUSSARD CLIFFORD H+�OHANN 14032 SE 700TH PL RENTON WA 98059 E93,000 593,000 5707,000 3 5707,000 14032 SE 100TH PL 98055 9,648 032305907100 BROUSSARD CLIFFORD JR BROUSSARD DIANA 14111 MAY VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98059 3252,000 E252,000 EO EO 369,388 606140034004 CARTER BETTY LOU 14010 SE t00TH PL RENTON WA 98059 593,000 E�,� E114,000 �� E102,000 14010 SE 100TH PL 98055 9,648 032305916408 CASTRO BENJAMIN 9630 COAL CREEK PW SE RENTON WA 98059 5125,000 5125,000 5179,000 � b179.000 9630 COAL CREEK PW SE 98055 72,308 342405970601 CHAFFEY CORPORATION 205 LAKE S#101 KIRKLAND WA 98003 334,000 534.000 EO SO 49,222 032305928700 qTV OF RENTON _ 7055 S GRADV WY RENTON WA 98055� 5327.000 EO SO $0 435,802 342405905108 COLE GARY 9517 746TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059� $87,000 587,000 E93,000 $93,000 9577 146TH AV SE 98055 172,933 032305911207 COOK RICHARD S+�pUANNA R 9824 138TH AV SE RENTON WA 98056 $127,000 E127.000 5732,000! E132,000 9624 COA�CREEK PW SE 98055 74,923 808740022009 CURTIN TRUDY M 14370 SE t00TH PL RENTON WA 98059 E93,000 593,000 5725,000 $125,000 74310 SE 100TH PL 98055 9,848 806140023007 CURTIN TRUDV M 14370 SE t00TH PL RENTON WA 98059 E56,000 E58,000 SO 50 9,306 032305924600 DO QUANG T+pHUNG CHUNG 8433 129TH AV SE RENTON WA 98056 E285,000 5285,000 E79.000 E79,000 10014 738TH AV SE 98055 82,328 032305906904 DUFFUS A 9805 143RD AV SE RENTON WA 98059 E159,000 $159,000 E209,000 5209.000 9605 143RD AV SE 98055 253,519 342405910J08 FABRE PAMELA J 13711 SE MAY VALLEY RD NEWCASttE WA 98059 567,000 367,000 587,000 587,000 13717 SE MAY VALLEV RD 98055 24,525 032305911702 FISHER ROBERT A&VIRGINiA i 14610 SE 99TH CT RENTON WA 98056 5110,000 E710,000 SO EO 70,567 342405909900 FOGLEMAN PAUL A 13875 SE MAY VALLEV RD RENTON WA 98059 E708.000 E708.000 $95,000 895,000 189,884 032305913603 FOSTER J A 4675 TIVOLI ST SAN DIEGO CA 92107 E78,000 E78,000 581,000 $87,000 13806 SE 100TH ST 98055 8,712 342405905809 GAMBINI HAROLD JR 13927 SE MAY VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98059 $80,000 E�,� 5241.000 $241,000 13927 SE MAY VALLEV RD 98055 42,548 342405911809 GAMBINI HAROLD JR 13927 SE MAV VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98058 E21,000 521,000 EO SO 44,866 032305913702 GARCIA JOSE M JR+MARICRUZ 13812 SE 100TH ST RENTON WA 98059 5�,� 588,000 570,000 570,000 13812 SE t00TH ST 98055 �,405 806140032008 GOODE KAREN G+NORMAN R 14024 SE 100TH PL RENTON WA 98059 593,000 593,000 5201,000 5201,000 14024 SE 100TH PL 98055 9,648 342405907607 HANDELAND EINER I+MARILYN J 9530 143RD AV SE RENTON WA 98059 E79.000 579,000 597,000 597,000 9530 143RD AV SE 98055 28,229 808140021001 HAYES RANDALL 14322 SE 100TH Pl RENTON WA 98055 528.000 528,000 $0 EO 8,374 608740020003 HAVES RANDALL K 14322 SE 700TH PL RENTON WA 98056 E93,000 5�.� 5728,000 5128,000 74322 SE 700TH PL 980�5 11,544 342405904802 HOFSCHULTE BEVER�V K 14127 SE MAPLE VALLEV RD RENTON WA 98059 E105,000 5105,000 E277,000 5277.000 74127 SE MAY VALLEY RD 98055 79,279 032305910203 HOLMES ROBERT 14670 SE 99TH CT RENTON WA 98059 $t05,000 5105,000 8287,000 E267,000 14672 SE 99TH CT 98059 43.580 606140013008 HUHN CLARA K 14143 SE 100TH PL RENTON WA 98055 593,000 Z55,000 E110,000 S�`.�14/43 SE t00TH PL 98055 9,796 606140024005 HUNTER ALONZO JR 74146 SE 100TH PL RENTON WA 98055 E98.000 5�.� 5124,000�' E�24,000 14148 SE t00TH PL 98055 14,740 606140017009 JACKMAN DONAID C JR 14319 SE 100TH PL RENTON WA 98059 $93,000 593,000 5149.000 • E749,000 14319 SE t00TH PL 98055 10,890 606140033008 LOVAN ANDREW P+�ULIE A 14018 SE 100TH PL RENTON WA 98059 E93,000 $93,000 E108.000 5706,000 14018 SE 100TH PL 98055 9,848 342405901907 MADFAI MARK 9524 143RD AV SE RENTON WA 98059 $72.000 E72,000 5145,000 5745,000 9524/43RD AV SE 98055 19,&10 342405907708 MAKOWSKI F G PO BOX 2215 BELFAIR WA 98528 $42,000 E42,000 $0 SO 32,480 342405901600 MALIN JAMES B+SUSAN G 13807 SE MAY VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98059 E74,000 E74,000 E74,000 E74,000 13807 SE MAY VALLEY RD 98055 38,080 032305905203 MCOOWELL JAMES HARVEY 9831 COAL CREEK PKWV SE RENTON WA 980r9 E369,000 $389,000 E48,000 548,000 9831 COAI CREEK PW SE 98055 216.057 342405902808 MERRELL RENEE E 13719 SE MAV VALLEV RD RENTON WA 98059 E87.000 E67.000 5113,000. Si 13,000 13719 SE MAY VALLEY RD 98055 25,050 032305910807 MERRITT MICHAEI M+CYNTHIA L 14408 SE 100TH ST RENTON WA 98056 t224,000 5224,000 5392,000 E392,000 14408 SE t00TH ST 98055 209,524 608140018001 MIODUSZEWSKI VINCE L*GLINDA J 14311 SE t00TH Pl RENTON WA 98059 593,000 593,000 5111.000 5111,000 14311 SE 100TH PL 9805.0 9,920 608140028008 NELSON KARLA J 14118 SE t00TH PL RENTON WA 98059 $93,000 593,000 S10B.000 5109,000 14116 SE 100TH PL 98055 9,848 �B08140012000 NETT LOREN J&KATHLEEN 22825 272ND AV SE MAPLE VALLEY WA 96038 593,000 E93,000 5118.000 5718,000 74135 SE 100TH PL 98055 9,840 BOEt140018007 NOLAND DENNIS E 14328 SE 100TH PL RENTON WA 98055 598,000 E�.� 5128,000 � 5728,000 74328 SE 700TH PL 98055 16,117 3424059088W OEHRLING MONTE V 232 FARBER LN CUSICK WA 991191 578,000 578.000 SO EO 295,336 606140011002 ONEIL PHVLLIS V 10383 SE 187TH PL RENTON WA 980''S E93,000 E93,000 E�04�000 E104.000 74127 SE t00TH PL 98055 9,840 342405907201 PARHANIEMI FRED[RICK R 13905 SE MAV VALLEV RD RENTON WA 98059 E72.000 E72,000 5140.000 5140,000 13905 SE MAY VALLEV RD 98055 32,775 342405911708 PARHANIEMI FREDERICK R 13905 SE MAV VALLEV RD RENTON WA 98Q59 $82.000 562,000 EO SO 81,479 032305900501 PRISSINOTTI NELLO E d ROSE 4713 125TH AV SE BELLEVUE WA 9800G 5225,000 5225,000 588.000 588,000 9830 138TH AV SE 98055 251,776 IX42305912805 ROBISON MATTHEW M 13826 SE 100TH ST RENTON WA 98055 588,000 SBB,WO $8.5,000 E�`,�13826 SE 100TH ST 98055 7,405 608140001003 SETH JON C 70003 i40TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 E93,000 593,000 5102,000 ! E�02,000 10003 140TH AV SE 98059 8,640 606140035001 SPIRY WILLIAM H JR 7000h 140TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST RENTON WA �J8055 593,000 593,000 E111.000 O 5111.000 70004 140TH AV SE 98055 9,804 342405906302 STABBERT DAN W+�{ERYL A 9400 HIILTOP RD BELLEWE WA 98004 E65,000 E�`.� E15,000 E15,000 53,578 80814000fi002 STELLINGWERFFF ERNEST H 14019 SE 100TH PL RENTON WA 98059 593,000 593,000 E91,000 E91,000 74019 SE 100TH PL 98055 9,6�5 606140014006 STRASSER CARI 14151 SE 100TH PL RENTON WA 980.59 $93.000 E93,000 E116,000 5118,000 14157 SE t00TH PL 98055 10,168 606140015003 STRASSER CARL 14751 SE t00TH PL RENTON WA 98059 E58,000 558,000 SO SO t0,788 342405905007 TABACEK AUGUST R+CpROI 14431 SE MAY VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98059 578,000 E78,000 5785.000 5785,000 14431 SE MAY VALLEY RD 98055 54,885 032305909502 VADNEY ALLEN J 17705 SE 124TH PL RENTON WA 98059 E88,000 588.000 EO EO 20,037 032305913801 VADNEV ALLEN J 17705 SE 724TH PL RENTON WA 98059 588,000 SB8.000 5101,000 E701,000 13830 SE 100TH ST 88055 7,405 606140007000 VELASCO RICK N*CAROLVN J 10003 141ST AV SE RENTON WA 98059 $93,000 393,000 E707,000 E707,000 10003 141ST AV SE 98055 9,800 806140027006 WALKER SALLV t3902 SE 257ST ST KENT WA 98042 558,000 S`'8.000 EO SO 9,848 032305906706 WARE EDWARD L JR PO BOX 2035 RENTON WA 98056 5500 5500 SO EO 3,840 606140003008 WARE EDWARD L JR PO BOX 2035 RENTON WA 98058 $58,000 558,000 SO $0 11,573 608140004007 WARE EDWARD L JR PO BOX 2035 RENTON WA 98056 93 000 93 000 142 000 142 000 14005 SE t00TH PL 98055 10 248 t� PID TAXPAYER NAME ATTN LINE TAXPAYER ADDRE55 CITY STATE ZIP APRLANDVAL TAXLANDVAL APRIMPVAL TAXIMPVAL SITUS ADDRESS IAND SQFT 342405910808 WARNER JEFFREY WEST� ANDERSON,THEODORE H i3727 SE MAV VALLEV RD RENTON WA 98058 587,000 E67,000 E86,000 E86.000 73727 SE MAY VALLEV RD 9&YS 24,375 032305924507 WELCH RICHARD+,�pD1E 13815 SE 100TH ST RENTON WA 98Q59 5135,OW 5135,000, SO SO 27,007 032305901905 WILLIAMSON ALAN LEN 1422 JEFFERSON AV NE RENTON WA 980.56 381,000 b81.000 57,000 E7.000 108,900 0323059127Pt WININGER ROBERT C _____ 13820 SE 100TH ST RENTON WA 98059 $88.000 5�.� E88.000 $88,000 13820 SE 100TH ST 98055 7,405 34240591W03 21MMERMAN MARY L 13703 SE MAY VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98059 E1.500 31,500 EO EO 2,030 342405971005 21MMERMAN MARY L 13703 SE MAY VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98059 E87,000 $67,000 3123,000 * E123,000 13703 SE MAY VALLEY RD 98055 24,000 342405911302 ZIMMERMAN MARV L 13703 SE MAY VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98059 5�`� E65 000 EO EO 21 545 f8,043,000 57,493,8211 E7.404,000 57.367,000 ft 5,246,814 i 2cres 120.45 � ��-�/�//"��'J- �/y1�11�'�2' �//1 ' �'�'�j��%�' G�'�1.��C'__ /��'��t�'. - �`��'11 �7C �/�� , , (� ' " /' ��/� �' /r��L�� _-- l%� �� 'i�' �� "l _ _. `�� '� _ _ i � � � � �. � ,c- �� ' ,� �r�� ,b ��; � .�� a �'� ��'�-- � � .��1�,� 1.�� 9 __ �� _____ � � � . , ,> ,, � , � � ��;�� ,'� J�r �� " �� ,�� '� �� ' q' ' , ��/"� 1 / /�// ��i�/�,�'r��C�� _ � t�('� , dc�� ✓'—�" .(��'�✓ �l� , � �C� ��C�� — �` �� ' � � - � � x �f � , � �� '�� .r � �'1.��J �� 1 � � � � � � � , � � �� , l��d" �� , � � �� 1l �� v� � _ �� -�� c�� ._____-- � � � - �� > > �� ` �� %f�-��''�;�J ��C��-�' �¢ �' �' 7C � = �' �I�-, _ � 2 �� `�,�� /�/i�� '�� ---�� 5� �� -----7T� / v /� � � ._-___'--\ ��-�' /l�ry✓,��r�t.s � �`_ _� � �/J � ---- - --�-----� ! P Y ,: r�P# t` ; �� r. PID TAXPAYER NAME ATTN LINE ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP APRLANOVA TAXLANDVA APRIMPVA TAXIMPVA SITUS ADDRESS LAND 807901072007 HEE KONRAD W H 5150 NE 20TH ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $179,000 �s$194,000 $194,000 5150 NE 20TH ST 98056 i 7320 807900043009 HLEBICA JOHN F 4928 N�23RD ST RENTON WA 98059' $119,000' $119,000 0$153,000� $153,000 4928 NE 23RD ST 98055 7208 342405904802 HOFSCHULTE BEVERLY K 14727 SE MAPLE VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98059� $105,000 $105,000 •$277,000 $277,000 14127 SE MAY VALLEY RD 98055 79279 --�-------- 032305910203 HOLMES ROBERT 74610 SE 99TH CT RENTON WA 98059 $105,000 $105,000 s$267,OOOi $267,000 74612 SE 100TH ST 43560 606140013008 HUHN CLARA K ____ 14143 SE 100TH PL RENTON WA �98055 $93,000 $55,000 .s $110,000 $85,000 14143 SE 100TH Pl 98055 9796 606140024005 HUNTER ALONZO JR _ _ 14146 SE 100TH PL RENTON WA 98055 $96,000' $96,000 � $124,000 $124,000 t4146 SE 100TH Pl 98055 14740 606140017009 JACKMAN DONALD C JR__ 14319 SE t00TH PL RENTON WA 96059 $93,000 $93,000 O 5�49,000 $149,000 14319 SE 100TH PL 96055 10890 807901071009 JIMENEZ JUAN A ____ _ 5154 NE 20TH ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $719,000� b$203,000 $203,000 5154 NE 20TH ST 98056 7320 807901037000 JUCKER MARKUS T � 5131 NE 23R0 ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 ! $183,000 $183,000 5131 NE 23R0 ST 98056 7370 807901045003 KELLY BRIAN MrTERESA M 5102 NE 21ST ST RENTON WA 98056 $119,000 $119,000 •$200,000 $200,000 5102 NE 21ST ST 98056 7603 807901006005 KREMER MATTHEW M+KRISTI A 20861LWAC0 AV NE RENTON WA 98059 $124,000 $124,000 • $274,000 $214,000 20861LWAC0 AV NE 98056 7200 807901058006 KUMAR RAJESH+SHAMILA 2069 HOQUTAM CT NE RENTON WA 98059 $179,000 $119,000 i $183,000 $183,000 2069 HOQUTAM CT NE 98056 8343 ` 807901031003 KUNTZ NICHOLAS JR KUNTZ MARGARET JEAN 5053 NE 23RD ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 i $783,000 $183,000 5053 NE 23RD ST 98056 7203 342405911203 KUSUNOSE TARO 14524 SE MAY VALLEY RD NEWCASTLE WA 98059 $100,000 $100,000 9 $148,000 $148,000 14524 SE MAY VALLEY RD 98055 40016 342405902400 LAUFFER MICHAEL T+MARION T 13928 SE MAY VALLEY RD NEWCASTLE WA 98059 $72,000 $72,000 • $99,000 $99,000 15382 807901060002 LEE GASPAR W J LEE-HO JULIA K M 2067 HOQUTAM CT NE RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 0$168,000, $168,000 2061 HOQUTAM CT NE 98056 10047 807901025005 LEENKNECHT PAUL B+LUCINDA L 5040 NE 23RD ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 !$194,000 $194,000 5040 NE 23RD ST 98056 7203 807901013001 LEVIN CRAIG+SANDR4 5219 NE 23RD CT RENTON WA 98059 $124,000 $124,000 � $208,000 $208,000 5219 NE 23RD ST 98056 8472 807901028009 LITTLE MICHAEL W+gRENDA H 5041 NE 23RD ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 i $193,000 $193,000 5041 NE 23RD ST 98056 7368 807901018000 LORSCH TRACY C 5120 NE 23RD ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 tl $164,000 $164,000 5120 ILWACO AV NE 98056 8504 606140033006 LOVAN ANDREW P+�ULIE A 14018 SE 100TH PL RENTON WA 98059 $93,000 $93,000 • $106,000 $106,000 14018 SE 100TH PL 96055 9648 807901070001 LUI SIU-LING LA1 SHUN WINC, 5160 NE 20TH ST RENTON WA 98056 $119,000 $179,000� * $195,000 $195,000 5160 NE 20TH ST 98056 7320 3a2405901907 MADFAI MARK 9524 143RD AV SE RENTON WA 98059 $72,000 $72,000 0$�45,000 $145,000 9524 143RD AV SE 98055 19800 342405907706 MAKOWSKI F G PO BOX 2215 BELFAIR WA 98528 $42,000 $42,000 $0 $0 32480 342405901600 MALIN JAMES B+SUSAN G 13807 SE MAY VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98059 $74,000 $74,000 $74,000 $74,000 13807 SE MAY VALLEY RD 98055 36080 807901014009 MAYER DAVID E+COLLEEN M 5214 NE 23RD CT RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 d*$175,000 $175,000 5214 NE 23RD ST 98056 7930 � 032305905203 MCDOWELL JAMES HARVEY 9831 COAL CREEK PKWY SE RENTON WA 98059 $369,000 $369,000 $48,000 $48,000 9831 COAL CREEK PW SE 98055 216057 731200026003 MCGR4TH DAVID M PO BOX 2607 RENTON WA 98056 $111,000 $111,000 a$252,000 $252,000 2620 ANACORTES AV NE 98055 4591 � � 342405902608 MERRELL RENEE E 13719 SE MAY VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98059 $67,000 $67,000 e$113,000 $113,000 13719 SE MAY VALLEY RD 98055 25050 A 032305910807 MERRITT MICHAEL M+CYNTHIA L 14408 SE t00TH ST RENTON WA 98056 $224,000 $224,000 0�$392,000 $392,000 14408 SE 100TH ST 98055 20952 �� U 807900041003 MIKOLAIZIK JAMES D+DEBRA J 5024 NE 23RD ST RENTON WA 98056 $119,000 $119,000 .'$1g7,000 $187,000 5024 NE 23RD ST 96055 7920 U 807901049005 MILNOR BRUCE A+LYNNE M 5030 NE 21ST ST RENTON WA 98056 $119,000 $119,000 +3 $155,000 $155,000 5030 NE 27ST ST 98056 10662 i�N' 606140016001 MIODUSZEWSKI VINCE L+GLINDA J 14311 SE t00TH PL RENTON WA 98059 $93,000 $93,000 P $111,000 $111,000 14311 SE 100TH PL 98055 9920 607901073005 MOJI KATHERINE A 5140 NE 20TH ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,0001 Y $202,000 $202,000 5140 NE 20TH ST 98056 7320 807901030005 MOY JAMES THONG+gEqTRICE TA 5051 NE 23R0 ST RENTON WA 98059. $119,000 $119,000' � $198,000 $198,000 5051 NE 23RD ST 98056 7203 807901036002 MUNGARA DHANUI+HIMA 5129 NE 23RD ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 A $157,000 $157,000 5129 NE 23RD ST 98056 7221 032305908900 NAZARIAN AVEDIS 1202 U ST NW AUBURN WA 98001 $187,000 $187,000 $61,000 $61,000 2322 DUVALL AV NE 98055 34412 600140020006 NELSON KARLA J 14116 SE 100TH PL RENTON WA 98059 $93,000 $93,000 /$109,000 $109,000 14116 SE t00TH PL 98055 9648 606140012000 NETT LOREN J&KATHLEEN 22825 272ND AV SE MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038 $93,000 $93,000 � $118,000 $118,000 14135 SE t00TH PL 98055 9840 606140016007 NOLAND DENNIS E 14326 SE 100TH PL RENTON WA 98055 $96,000 $96,000 $128,000 $128,000 14326 SE t00TH PL 98055 i6117 342405908605 OEHRLING MONTE V 232 FARBER LN CUSICK WA 99119 $78,000 $78,000 $0 $0 29533 606140011002 ONEIL PHYILIS V 10363 SE 167TH PL RENTON WA 98055 $93,000 $93,000 $104,000 $104,000 14127 SE t00TH PL 98055 9840 807901040004 OR EMILY YEE MEI 5114 127TH PL SE BELLEVUE WA 98006 $119,000 $119,000 •$t85,000 $185,000 22171LWAC0 AV NE 98056 7505 807901001006 OR RINGO WING-WAH PO BOX 5542 BELLEVUE WA 98006 $119,000 $119,000 • $167,000 $167,000 20501LWAC0 AV NE 98056 8365 807901019008 OSOTIO JEFFREY L+LISA D. 5114 NE 23RD ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 � $189,000 $189,000 5114 NE 23RD ST 98056 7526 342405907201 PARHANIEMI FREDERICK R 13905 SE MAY VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98059 $72,000 $72,000 • $140,000 $140,000 13905 SE MAY VALLEY RD 98055 32775 342405911708 PARHANIEMI FREDERICK R 13905 SE MAY VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98059 $62,000 $62,000 $0 $0 6141 807901046001 PERRINA PASQUALE+LIDIA 5046 NE 21ST ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 �l$190,000 $190,000 5046 NE 21ST ST 98056 9550 807901047009 POH JIM+SHIH LOUISA C 5040 NE 21ST ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 0$185,000 $185,000 5040 NE 21ST ST 98056 8138 032305900501 PRISSINOTTI NELLO E 8 ROSE 4713 125TH AV SE BE�LEVUE WA 98006 $225,000 $225,000 $68,000 $68,000 9830 138TH AV SE 98055 25177 807901011005 REED DONNA L 2230 ILWACO AV NE RENTON WA 98059 $124,000 $124,000 #$205,000 $205,000 2230 ILWACO AV NE 98056 8389 807901007003 RHODES RONALD G+CORIANNE 2122 ILWACO AV NE RENTON WA 98056 $124,000 $124,000 •$205,000 $205,000 21221LWAC0 AV NE 98056 7200 807901008001 RICHARDSON DANIEL WAYNE 2200 ILWACO AV NE RENTON WA 98059 $124,000 $124,000 .$191,000 $191,000 22001LWAC0 AV NE 98056 7377 807901041002 ROBERTSON RICHARD W+REBECCA 5120 NE 21ST ST RENTON WA 98056 $119,000 $119,000 O$195,000 $195,000 5120 NE 21ST ST 96056 8273 032305912605 ROBISON MATTHEW M 13826 SE 100TH ST RENTON WA 98055 $88,000 $88,000 $85,000 $85,000 13826 SE 100TH ST 98055 7405 807901056000 ROSE RICHARD H+ROSALIE B 5035 NE 21ST ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 i� $151,000 $151,000 5035 NE 21ST ST 98056 7849 807901029007 SANTI LARRY D+DEBRA R 5045 NE 23RD ST RENTON WA 98056 $119,000 $119,000 •$179,000 $179,000 5045 NE 23RD ST 98056 7203 807901012003 SCHMEER GREGORY E+MARGARET 5213 NE 23RD CT RENTON WA 98059 $124,000 $124,000 • $214,000 3214,000 5213 NE 23RD ST 98056 8962 807901059004 SCHROEDER EDGAR H+MARCIA I 2065 HOQUTAM CT NE RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 $186,000 $186,000 2065 HOQUTAM CT NE 98056 7768 606140001003 SETH JON C 10003 140TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 $93,000 $93,000 •$102,000 $102,000 t0003 140TH AV SE 98059 8640 807901003002 SHAH NIGAM 8 RESHMA 2062 ILWACO AV NE RENTON WA 98059 $124,000 $124,000 +$199,000 $199,000 2062 ILWACO AV NE 98056 7200 803540009005 SHERMAN DANIEL L 5310 NE 24TH CT RENTON WA 98059 $135,000 $135,000 0 $ygq,000 $294,000 5310 NE 24TH CT 98058 2053 807901032001 SIIHAN CHRISTOPHER J 5055 NE 23RD ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 ♦$215,000 $215,000 5055 NE 23RD ST 98056 7389 807901024008 SLOBODKIN HYLAN+RITA 5044 NE 23RD ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 �$222,000 $222,000 5044 NE 23RD ST 98056 7203 807900046002 SMITH DONALD R 4922 NE 23RD ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 $159,000 $159,000 4922 NE 23RD ST 98055 7228 606140035001 SPIRY WILLIAM H JR 10004 140TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST RENTON WA 98055 $93 000 $93 000 111 OOOi $111 000 10004 140TH AV SE 98055 9804 �/��,�^� Lr>�9,v'-'c- t`�� Ci�L��1��9�Cr�r/i ��y�.� �J ��')�� , A ,�\ J ��^ ,y � , � Page2of3 � �rybi2✓'�"` G� �r �S ��/✓6�Y�7t{ /�'�/ �/ d d "' ��/� - � f �t� 7 c��J � � � � r � � . � 'a , a , 1 t r PID TAXPAYERNAME i ATfNLINE ADDRESS CITYSTATE ZIP APRLANDVA TAXLANDVA APRIMPVA4TAXIMPVA SITUSADORESS I LAND 807901051001 ABEL MONICA R+ABEL MARK H_-+ 5022 NE 21ST ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $1 t9,000 � $172,000� $172,000 5022 NE 21ST ST 98056 8748 342405907508 AMUNDSON GARY M 14424 SE MAY VALLEY RD NEWCASTLE WA 98059 $t00,00+_ $100,0001 I�$130,000 $130,000 14424 SE MAY VALLEY RD 98055 39953 807901023000 ANDERSON GARY S 8 HELEN ANN 5050 NE 23RD ST RENTON WA 98056 $119,000! $119,000'• $202,000 $202,000 5050 NE 23RD ST 96056 7210 03230590�308 ANDREWS MARL 5 9606 143RD AV SE RENTON WA 98059 $268,000 $268,OOOi� $489,000 �M$489,000 372002 606140008008 BAILEY LEE S 18833 96TH AV NW STANWOOD WA 98292 $27,000 $27,OOOt- $0 $0 9600 606140009006 BAILEY LEE S 18633 96TH AV NW iSTANWOOD WA 98292 $93,000 $93,000 $107,000 $107,000 14111 SE 100TH PL 98055 9840 606140010004 BAILEY LEE S 18833 96TH AV NW iSTANWOOD WA 98292 $27,000 $27,000 $0 $0 9840 807901039006 BARRIGAN THOMAS C 2219 I�WACO AV NE RENTON WA 98059i $119,000 $119,000 O $171,000 $171,000 2219 ILWACO AV NE 98056 7235 606140002001 BATES KARI J 10003 140TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 $27,000 $27,000 $0 $0 8379 032305924709 BLAYDEN ROBERT E&SHIRIEY PO BOX 3029 RENTON WA 98056 $224,000 $224,000 $230,000 $230,000 9933 143RD AV SE 98055 26876 807901020006 BOLLMAN MARK W+FR4NCES P 5110 NE 23RD ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 $171,000 $171,000 5110 NE 23RD ST 98056 � 7274 032305903802 BONWELL JAMES L+�ULIE P 9616 146TH AV SE RENTON WA 98056 $122,000 $122,000 ' $151,000 $t51,000 9616 146TH AV SE 98055 117612 606140025002 BOSS TYRE G 14130 SE 100TH PL RENTON WA 98056 $96,000 $96,000 "' $124,000: $124,000 14130 SE 100TH PL 98055 � 14740 807901022002 BRADFORD JON R+CAROLYN E 5054 NE 23RD ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 '� $191,000{ $191,000 5054 NE 23RD ST 98056 7203 807901065001 BRANDT JEFPREY&DEBRA __ 5131 NE 21ST ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000� $199,000�-$199,000 5131 NE 21ST ST 98056 7637 032305911607 BRANT DARRELL 9620 COAL CREEK PW RENTON WA 98059 $86,000�_ $86,000'� $150,000! $150,000 9620 COAL CREEK PW SE 98056 32234 807901053007 BRAUN DOUGLAS F+TERESA L 5017 NE 21ST ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 $185,000 $185,000 5017 NE 21ST ST 98056 7537 807901043008 BROUGHTON MICHAEL+�ENNIFER 5108 NE 21ST ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,OOOi $119,000 $171,000 $171,000 5108 NE 21ST ST 98056 8227 032305924608 BROUSSARD CLIFFORD H JR 14111 SE MAY VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98055 $1,000 $1,000 $0 $0 12196 342405904703 BROUSSARD CLIFFORD H JR 14111 SE MAY VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98055 $208,000 $50,621 $179,000 $179,000 14111 SE MAY VALLEY RD 98055 266151 606140029004 BROUSSARD CLIFFORD H JR 14111 SE MAY VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98055 $56,000 $56,000 $0 $0 9648 032305900204 BROUSSARD CLIFFORD H+�OHANN 14032 SE 100TH PL RENTON WA 98059 $220,000 $220,000 $0 $0 27573 606140030002 BROUSSARD CLIFFORD HtJOHANN 14032 SE t00TH PL RENTON WA 98059 $56,000 $56,000 $0 $0 9648 606140031000 BROUSSARD CLIFFORD H+�OHANN 14032 SE t00TH PL RENTON WA 98059 $93,000 $93,000 ¢ $107,000 $107,000 14032 SE t00TH PL 98055 9648 032305907100 BROUSSARD CLIFFORD JR BROUSSARD DIANA 14111 MAY VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98059 $252,000 $252,000 $0 $0 36938 807907033009 BYE WESLEY J+SUSAN M 5t03 NE 23RD ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 $160,000 $160,000 5703 NE 23RD ST 98056 ! 7334 807901034007 CARNEY HOWARD P+LINDA A 5113 NE 23RD ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 $209,000 $209,000 5113 NE 23RD ST 98056 i 7213 � � '�� 807901004000 CARRINGTON ANDREW O+MATT�E 2064 ILWACO AV NE RENTON WA 98059 $124,000 $124,000 $168,000 $168,000 2064 ILWACO AV NE 98056 � 7200 �i� v 606140034004 CARTER BETTY LOU 14010 SE 100TH PL RENTON WA 98059 $93,000 $66,OOQ♦ $114,000' $102,000 14010 SE 100TH PL 98055 9648 032305916408 CASTRO BENJAMIN 9630 COAL CREEK PW SE RENTON WA 98059 $125,000 $125,000', ri$179,000 $179,000 9630 COAL CREEK PW SE 98055 72309 I'�u� 342405910601 CHAFFEY CORPORATION 205 LAKE S#101 KIRKLAND WA 98003 $34,0001 $34,000 $0 $0 49222 � 80790t027001 CHIU CHU SHIN 5035 NE 23RD ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000' $119,000 $172,000 $172,000 5035 NE 23RD ST 98000 7307 80790t061000 CHOI JAE G+CHO HAE S 2059 HOQUTAM CT NE RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 � $186,000 $186,000 2059 HOQUTAM CT NE 98056 7214 032305928700 CI7Y OF RENTON 1055 S GRADY WY RENTON WA 98055 $327,000 $0 $0 $0 43821 807901074003 CITY OF RENTON 1055 S GRADY WY RENTON WA 98055' $1,000 $0 $0 $0 18792 342405905106 COLE GARY 9517 146TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 $87,000 $87,000 $93,000 $93,000 9517 146TH AV SE 98055 17293 032305911201 COOK RICHARD S+LOUANNA R 9624 138TH AV SE RENTON WA 98056 $127,000 $127,000 8 $132,000 $132,000 9624 COAL CREEK PW SE 98055 74923 606140022009 CURTIN TRUDY M 14310 SE t00TH PL RENTON WA 98059 $93,000 $93,000 � $125,000 $125,000 14310 SE t00TH PL 98055 9648 60614002300�CURTIN TRUDY M 14310 SE 100TH PL RENTON WA 98059 $56,000 $56,000 $0 $0 9306 803540011001 DALY MICHAEL 5305 NE 24TH CT RENTON WA 98059 $135,000 $135,000 $353,000' $353,000 5307 NE 24TH CT 98056 22998 807901002004 DEUTSCH ANDREW&KERRI 2060 ILWACO AV NE RENTON WA 98059 $124,000 $124,000 > $163,000 $163,000 2060 ILWACO AV NE 98056 7200 807901068005 DING JUDY N 5180 NE 20TH ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,OOOI♦ $148,000 $148,000 5180 NE 20TH ST 98056 7817 342405915006 DIVINE JOHN D 14140 SE MAY VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98059 $72,000 $72,000� $62,000 $62,000 15382 032305924600 DO QUANG TrpHUNG CHUNG 8433 129TH AV SE RENTON WA 98056 $265,000 $265,000 $79,000 $79,000 10014 138TH AV SE 98055 82328 807901017002 DOLAN ANDREA R+FAUL P 5126 NE 23RD ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 $192,000 $192,000 5124 NE 23RD ST 98059 9564 032305906904 DUFFUS A 9605 143RD AV SE RENTON WA 98059 $159,000 $159,000 $209,000 $209,000 9605 143RD AV SE 98055 25351 807901038008 ERICKSEN CRAIG+�(p,THLEEN L 2229ILWACO AV NE RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 $174,000 $174,000 22291LWAC0 AV NE 98056 7817 342405910908 FABRE PAMELA J 13711 SE MAY VALLEY RD NEWCASTLE WA 98059 $67,000 $67,000 '� $87,000 $87,000 13711 SE MAY VALLEY RD 98055 24525 807901054005 FELICETTI FRANCIS J+LORI A 5023 NE 21ST ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 $187,000 $187,000 5023 NE 21ST ST 98056 7538 032305911102 FISHER ROBERT A 8 VIRGIN�A 14610 SE 99TH CT RENTON WA 96056 $110,000 $110,000 $0 $0 70567 342405909900 FOGLEMAN PAUT A 13815 SE MAY VALLEY RD RENTON WA 96059 $108,000 $108,000 $95,000 $95,000 16986 807901055002 FOOTE ROBERT A+SUSAN E 5027 NE 21 ST ST RENTON WA 98056 $119,000 $119,000 0$189,000 $189,000 5027 NE 21 ST ST 96056 7402 032305913603 FOSTER J A 4675 TIVOLI ST SAN DIEGO CA 92707 $78,000 $78,000 / $61,000 $81,000 13806 SE t00TH ST 98055 6712 342405905809 GAMBINI HAROLD JR 13927 SE MAY VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98059 $80,000 $80,000 O$241,000 $241,000 13927 SE MAY VALLEY RD 98055 42548 342405911609 GAMBINI HAROLD JR 13927 SE MAY VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98056 $21,000 $21,000 $0 $0 44866 032305913702 GARCIA JOSE M JR+MARICRUZ 13812 SE 100TH ST RENTON WA 98059 $88,000 $88,000 $70,000 $70,000 13812 SE 100TH ST 98055 7405 807901009009 GIFFORD CURTIS R 2210 ILWACO AV NE RENTON WA 98059 $124,000 $124,000 0$189,000 $189,000 2210 ILWACO AV NE 98056 9046 606140032008 GOODE KAREN G�NORMAN R 14024 SE 100TH PL RENTON WA 98059 $93,000 $93,000 $201,000 $201,000 14024 SE 100TH PL 98055 9648 807900042001 GRABOWSKI MIROSLAW K+MARIA 4930 NE 23RD ST RENTON WA 98059� $119,000 $119,000 - $179,000 $179,000 4930 NE 23RD ST 98055 7321 � 807901015006 GREEN ROBERT A+KIMBERLY K 5210 NE 23RD CT RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 $199,000 $199,000 5210 NE 23RD ST 98056 8773 807901063006 GUNDERSON JOHN+LINDA 2068 HOQUTAM CT NE RENTON WA 98056 $119,000 $119,000 $179,000 $779,000 2068 HOQUTAM CT NE 98056 7222 342405907607 HANDELAND EINER I+MARIIYN J 9530 143RD AV SE RENTON WA 98059 $79,000 $79,000 $97,000 $97,000 9530 143RD AV SE 98055 2822 807901057008•HANNON JEFFRV N+�O ANN B 5039 NE 21 ST ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 $214,000 $214,000 5039 NE 21 ST ST 98056 7696 606140021001 HAYES RANDALL 14322 SE t00TH Pl RENTON WA 96055 $28,000 $28,000 $0 $0 8374 606140020003 HAYES RANDALL K 14322 SE 100TH PL RENTON WA 98056 $93,000 $93,000 n$128,000 $128,000 14322 SE t00TH PL 98055 11544 803540010003 HAYS PAUL T 5304 NE 24TH CT RENTON WA 98059 $135 000 $135 000 $359 000 $359 000 5304 NE 24TH CT 98058 18401 5 ��'r��'S �.��,� ��.� � /// �J/� �' �/�,�'�,�ri,✓'��/' 3`�� °I C'�''d�� /�/J/��-�e%`�s��(��/<iI. l�_ ��(��j,�i�L% Page t of 3 �I �`�"✓`� y�f-f�� 2��%" ��['L � 4 / / J f J / V �J��'� �`�� /j� G��,��l�l��-� �y�'�� G��1 �� ' • • �. , ` F J f PtD TAXPAYER NAME ATTN LINE ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP APRLANDVA TAXLANDVAU APRIMPVA TAXIMPVA SITUS ADDRESS LAND 807901050003 ST GERMAINE GINA 5026 NE 21ST ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 0 $�88,000 $188,000 5026 NE 21ST ST 98056 7949 342405906302 STABBERT DAN W+CHERYL A 1353 92ND AV NE CLYDE HILL WA 98004 $65,000 $65,000 $15,000 $15,000 53578 606140006002 STELLINGWERFFF ERNEST H 14019 SE 100TH PL RENTON WA 98059 $93,000 $93,000 � $91,000 $91,000 14019 SE 100TH PL 98055 9675 606140014006 STRASSER CARL 14151 SE 100TH PL RENTON WA 98059 $93,000 $93,000 • $116,000 $116,000 14151 SE 100TH PL 98055 10168 606140015003 STRASSER CARL 14151 SE 100TH PL RENTON WA 98059 $56,000 $56,000 $0 $0 10168 807901021004 SULLIVAN MATTHEW A+DANA D 5106 NE 23RD ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 0 $151,000 $151,000 5106 NE 23RD ST 98056 7225 342405905007 TABACEK AUGUST R+CAROL 14431 SE MAY VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98059 $78,000 $78,000 �9 $185,000 $185,000 14431 SE MAY VALLEY RD 98055 5488 807901016004 TALLMAN LEIGH A+DEBORAFI M 5208 NE 23RD CT RENTON WA 98055 $119,000 $119,000 $186,000 $186,000 5208 NE 23RD ST 98056 7186 80790004W04 TAYLOR DALE E+SARA F 4924 NE 23RD ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 $196,000 $196,000 4924 NE 23RD ST 98055 7202 342405905304 TEO PENG HENG+KITTV KITBING TAM 14716 SE MAY VALLEY RD NEWCASTLE WA 98059 $202,000 $202,000 $176,000 $176,000 14716 SE MAY VALLEY RD 98055 34194 807901042000 TIEDE MIITON AfERIKA 5110 NE 21ST ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 0$�48,000 $148,000 5110 NE 21ST ST 98056 8527 � 807901066009 TOMOKIYO ROLAND T+ANN K 2067 ILWACO AV NE RENTON WA 98056 $119,000 $119,000 i $186,000 $186,000 2067 ILWACO AV NE 98056 7205 i 807901062008 NERSKOY BORIS&MARINA 2064 HOQUTAM CT NE RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 !�$199,000 $199,000 2064 HOQUTAM CT NE 98056 9048 �� 032305909502 VADNEY ALLEN J 17705 SE 124TH PL RENTON WA 98059 $88,000 $88,000 $0 $0 20037 032305913801 VADNEY ALLEN J 17705 SE 124TH PL RENTON WA 98059 $88,000 $88,000 $101,000 $101,000 13830 SE t00TH ST 98055 7405 803540007009 VADNEY BRYAN L+KENDRA A 5404 NE 24TH CT RENTON WA 98059 $135,000 $135,000 S $368,000 $368,000 5404 NE 24TH CT 98058 1738 807901035004 VALDEZ MANUEL H 5123 NE 23RD ST RENTON WA 98056 $119,000 $119,000 t$176,000 $176,000 5123 NE 23RD ST 98056 7240 807901069003 VANDEWAY TIMOTHY M 5170 NE 20TH ST RENTON WA 98059 5119,000 $179,000 $170,000 $170,000 5170 NE 20TH ST 98056 7505 807901048007 VASQUEZ BENEDICTO L+MERLY L 5036 NE 21ST ST RENTON WA 98056 $119,000 $419,000 r$172,000 $172,000 5036 NE 21ST ST 98056 7976 606140007000 VELASCO RICK N+CAROLYN J 10003 141ST AV SE RENTON WA 98059 $93,000 $93,000 A$107,000 $107,000 10003 141ST AV SE 98055 9600 807901067007 VEVANG JAMES S 2063 ILWACO AV NE RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000� C$173,000 $173,000 2063 ILWACO AV NE 98056 7202 606140027008 WALKER SALLY 13902 SE 251ST ST KENT WA 98042 $56,000 $56,000 $0 $0 9648 342405905502 WANGMO MARY TSERING 14508 SE MAY VALLEY RD NEWCASTLE WA 98059 $100,000 $100,000 • $107,000 $107,000 14508 SE MAY VALLEY RD 98055 40017 032305906706 WARE EDWARD L JR PO BOX 2035 RENTON WA 98056 $500 $500 $0 $0 3640 606140003009 WARE EDWARD L JR PO BOX 2035 RENTON WA 98056 $56,000 $56,000 $0 $0 1157 606140004007 WARE EDWARD L JR PO BOX 2035 RENTON WA 98056 $93,000 $93,000 + $142,000 $142,000 14005 SE 100TH PL 98055 1024 342405910809 WARNER JEFFREY WEST+ ANDERSON,THEODORE H 13727 SE MAY VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98056 $67,000 $67,000 • $86,000 $86,000 13727 SE MAY VALLEY RD 98055 24375 807901044006 WARREN JOSEPH R 5106 NE 21ST ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 � $175,000 $175,000 5106 NE 21ST ST 98056 8336 807900044007 WEI SING+FEON HUA 4926 NE 23RD ST RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 9 $171,000 $171,000 4926 NE 23RD ST 98055 7232 032305924501 WELCH RICHARD+�pDIE 13815 SE 100TH ST RENTON WA 98059 $135,000 $135,000 $0 $0 27007 807901052009 WHITE MICHAEL J+CONNIE J 5018 NE 21ST ST RENTON WA 98056 $119,000 $119,000 !$199,000 $199,000 5018 NE 21ST ST 98056 8578 807901064004 WILLIAMS DAVID D 2072 HOQUTAM CT NE RENTON WA 98059 $119,000 $119,000 �$186,000 $186,000 2072 HOQUTAM CT NE 98056 7616 032305901905 WILLIAMSON ALAN LEN 1422 JEFFERSON AV NE RENTON WA 98056 $81,000 $81,000 $1,000 $1,000 9611 146TH AV SE 98055 10890 032305912704 WININGER ROBERT C 13820 SE 100TH ST RENTON WA 98059 $88,000 $88,000 $88,000 $88,000 13820 SE 100TH ST 98055 7405 807901010007 WOLCOTT JEfFREY J 2220 ILWACO AV NE RENTON WA 98059 $124,000 $124,000 $191,000 $191,000 2220ILWACO AV NE 98056 8066 607901005007 YOUNG FRANK N III+�ENNIFER 2084 ILWACO AV NE RENTON WA 98059 $124,000 $124,000 $225,000 $225,000 2084 ILWACO AV NE 98056 7200 342405910403 ZIMMERMAN MARY L 13703 SE MAY VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98059 $1,500 $1,500 $0 $0 2030 342405911005 ZIMMERMAN MARY L 13703 SE MAY VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98059 $67,000 $67,000 +p$123,000 $123,000 13703 SE MAY VALLEY RD 98055 24000 342405911302 ZIMMERMAN MARY L 13703 SE MAY VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98059 $65,000 $65,000 $0 $0 21545 $18 870 000 $18 319 621 $24 227 000$24 164 000 /� �d�'�' ; 1 `� �F � G � '��, � �t�i rf ' , �' 'r�= ��.�f�1' � 7��::?�,� `1j 6 ic11��r'� /�:��':� �� i ' � � �. ��,� ��,�j ��7 �� 'G'��'-' ��'r�%,� -.5 ,, � ��j�� 'l� �� ' � PSti'�'r�/��-"�l .�v� ��,GC��✓'�`-> _ /� ��.� � Y � =- �/; /�� D�� . ��`� �'� �/�l�-� �i�� rf� ��, �C� `�� ,�� C>��,� � � , � �� c� � /172��'�� 3 �r�7�� - Page 3 of 3 ;;, CITY OF RENTON � Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Kathy Keolker-wheeter, Mayor Alex Pietsch,Administrator May 26, 2005 Cliff and Leigh Broussard 14111 SE May Valley Road Renton,WA 98059 SUBJECT: TIMELINE FOR MERRITT II ANNEXATION Dear Mr. and Mrs. Broussard: Thank you for your email of regarding the timing of this annexation. As you probably know your property is located in what is now called Phase I of the Merritt II Annexation. Phase I is anticipated to officially come into the City of Renton on June 6, 2005, assuming publication of the ordinance in the local newspapers on May 28,2005. We are sorry you had to wait so long but this has been a difficult annexation because of the changes to the R-1 zone,the expansion of the area by the Boundary Review Board for King County and then the added complication of having to phase the annexation so that the road widening and new bridge on Coal Creek Parkway would continue to be partially funded by King County. If you have any questions about this annexation please feel free to call me 425-430-6581. Sincerel � /�� Don on,AICP Senior Planner/Strategic Planning 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N T O N �This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer A H E A D O F T H E C U R V E -� Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County Yesler Building, Room 402, 400 Yesler Wai�, Seattle, WA 98104 Phorie: (206)296-6800 • Fax: (206)296-6803 • littp:%/www.metrvkc.goz�/arinexations 7anuary 14,2005 ... .��, y.�..�M... .,�� 1�'Y�� .t r"''� 4�'y Fram JA�J 1 8 :a°�:�::: City of Rf.mton :<;or�nnn�c ot�vt�a�n;�En±r rvc,� _.��oo�s Attn: Don Erickson, AICP, ' ,�, :,:' .,�,,,�,A,,,r��., SeniorPlanner -�-.�.w��..W_...N..�..,��W_,.�.,�_ 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 RE: CLOSING LETTER FOR RESOLUTION AND HEARING DECISION File No. 2178—City of Renton—Merritt II Annexation Dear Mr. Erickson: We are writing to advise you that the Washington State Boundary Review Boazd for King County has now completed the Resolution and Hearing Deasion, as specified in RCW 36.93,to approve the above referenced propos�i action(filed with the Board effective July 13, 2004. The Resolutian and Hearing Decision for this action is enclosed for filing as prescribed by RCW 36.93.160(4). An appeal period to Superior Court has been established, as mandated by RCW 36.93.160. The appeal period to Superior Court will clase on Febniary 14, 2005 . In order to finalize the proposed action, the applicant must address the following requirements, where applicable: 1. Compliance with the statutory requirrements and procedures specified in the Notice of IT1tEi1t20I1; 2. Sewer and Water district actions and some other acti�ns aze also subject to approval by the Me�tropolitan King County Councii. If the Council makes changes to the proposal, the Board may then be required to hold a public hearing. 3. Filing with King County of franchise application(s), as required, accompanied by a capy of this letter. 4. Filing with King County of pernut applicaiion(s), as required, accompanied by a copy of this letter. Page two continued,January 14, 2005 Form HE 8 5. Notification to King County Office of Regional Policy and Plaiu�ing, in writing, of your intended effective date of this action. This notifica.tion should be provided as early as possible. Please send this information ta Nfichael Thomas, O�ce of Management and Budget, 516 Third Avenue,Room 402, Seattle,Washington 98104, and 6. Filing with King County Council of (1)one certifie,d copy of your final resolution or ordinance accamplishing this action;and(2)a copy of this letter. This document should be filed with the Clerk of the Council(Attn: Ms Anne Noris),King County Courthouse,Room 1025, Seattle, Washington 98104 If you have questions or would like additional inforrnation,please corrtact our office at 206.296.6800. Sincerely, Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary Attachment:Resolution and Hearing Decision cc: Ms. Anne Noris, Clerk of Council Ms. Diane Murdock,King County Department of Assessmerrts Ms.Lydia Reynolds-Jones,Manager,Project Support Seivices Mr. Bill Huennekens,R�;ords and Elections Division King County E-911 Program Mr. Paul Reitenbach,Department of Development&Environmental Services Mr. 11riichael Thomas, Office of Management and Budget District(s): King County Fire Protection District No. 25,Coa1 Creek Utility District, King County Water District Na. 90, Issaquah School Distri+ct No. 411, Renton School District No. 403 w� PROCEEDINGS OF THE WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REYIEW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY RESOLUTION AND HEARING DECISION IN RE: CITY OF RENTON FILE NO.2178 Merritt 11 Proposed Annexation King Courrty,Washington A Notice of IMention was submitted in July 2004 by the City of Renton to the Washington State Boundary Review Boand. The Notice of Intention (Boundary Review Boa�d File No. 2178) proposed that the City of Renton annex a certain 20.59-acre portion of territory within the 133-acre May Valley Potentiai Annexation Area. The Notice of Intention for the initialiy proposed Merritt ii Annexation Area (20.59 acres) is based upon an annexation petition by property owners. The initiaNy proposed annexation was undertaken by the Renton City Council based upon a petition (50/50 method) submitted in February 2004 from property owners and resicients seeking annexation to the City. The City Council adopted the Merritt II Annexation Petition in May 2004. Petitioners are seeking annexation in order to be governed by and to receive services from the City of Renton. The Merritt II Annexation (20.59 acres) proposes annexation of a generally "T"-shaped peninsula. The Merritt 11 Annexation site is located on the northeastem side of the City of Renton. The proposed boundaries of the initially proposed Memtt II Annexation Area are described as: ■ The northern boundary of the annexation area is variously formed by May Valley Creek and NE 27"' Street(if extended). • The southern boundary of the annexation area is formed by SE 100"'Street. ■ The western boundary of the annexation area is variously formed by 142nd Avenue NE and Graham Avenue(if extended). ■ The eastem boundary of the annexation area is formed by Lyons avenue NE and by Ilwaco Avenue NE (if extended). On August 27, 2004, the Office of the King County F�cecutive invoked jurisdiction (submitted a request for a public hearing) before the Boundary Review Board conceming the proposed Merritt II Annexation. The County proposed the modification of the proposed Memtt II to include the entire 133-acre May Valley Potential Annexa6on Area. The invoking of jurisdidion was based upon concems related to: • The County's continued ability to provide efficient local services in an urban unincorporated area with irregular municipal boundaries and relative isolation between the cities of Renton and Newcastle; ■ Environmen#al and surface water management issues associated with the May Valley corridor, ■ The application of appropriate zoning to protect the regionally designated May Valley urban separator, ■ Consistency with adopted plans and policies including the King County Comprehensive Land Use Plan, and the Countywide Planning Policies; and, ■ Consistency with Boundary Review Board Objectives. The Boundary Review Board confirmed that the County's request for a public hearing was authorized pursuant to RCW 36.93. Legal notice having been duly given, a public hearing was conducted on November 3, 2004 before a quorum of the Boundary Review Board in order to consider the original proposal by the City of Renton to incorporate the Merritt II Annexation Area. At that public hearing, the Board also considered whether King County's request to expand the proposed Merritt II Annexation to include the May Valley Potential Annexation Area would merit specific review based on the state law (RCW 36.93)that sets criteria for annexation. 1 i At fhe conclusion of that hearing, the Boundary Review Board made a decision (by a unanimous vote) to continue the public hearing to consider King County's request for modification of the Merritt II Annexation. The Board determined that this review would be appropriate to meet the requirements of state law(RCW 36.93, RCW 36.70A, et al). More specifically, the Board agreed to consider modification of the initially proposed Merritt II Annexation to inciude the entire May Valley Poterrtiai Annexation Area at 133 acres. The proposed modified boundaries of the F�cpanded Merritt ii Annexation (henceforth described as the May Valley Potential Annexation Area) are generally described as foliows: ■ The northern boundary of the annexation area is formed by May Valley Road ■ The southern boundary of the annexation area is formed by NE 23'�Street(contiguous with the City of Renton). ■ The westem boundary of the annexation area is formed by Coal Creek Parkway/136"'Avenue NE (contiguous with the City of Renton). ■ The eastern boundary of the annexation area is formed by Lyons avenue NE and by Ilwaco Avenue NE (if extended). Legal notice having been duly given, a continued hearing was he�d on August 23, 2U04 before a quorum of the Boundary Review Board. On the basis of the testimony, evidence and exhibits presented at said hearing, and the matters on record in said File No. 2178, it is the decision of the Board that the action proposed in said Notice of Intention be, and the same is, hereby approved with mod�cations to include the entire May Vafley Annexation Area (approximately 133 acres). The legal description of the May Valley Annexation Area, as approved with modifications, is attached hereto and marked as "Exhibit 1", together with a map showing the boundaries of the area herein marked as°Exhibit II." In reaching a decision in favor of annexa6on of the entire May Valley Potential Annexation Area, the Boarci considered RCW 36.93. (Local Govemments — Boundaries — Review Boards), with particular attention to RCW 36.93.170 (Factors) and RCW 36.93.180 (Objectives) in accord with the mandate of the State of Washington. The Board atso considered RCW 36.93.15d, which establishes the authority for modification of annexation proposals. As further required by the State of Washington, the Board has considered RCW 36.70.A, the Growth Management Act, the King County Comprehensive Plan, and the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan. The Boanl has also considered ather applicable state, regional, and local regulations and guidelines. The Board is responsible, under state law, to: (1) examine the recorcl (e.g., documents, exhibits, testimony); (2) determine the specific policies and guidelines are applicable to the proposed action; (3) review and balance these elements; and (4)take the action that best advances those elements. The record for The City of Renton Merritt II/May Valley Annexation (File No. 2178) includes, but may not be limited to: � City of Renton: Application materials; technical studies; fiscal studies; regulatory analyses; exhibits; narrative statements in support of the proposed annexation; statements in response to opponents' submittals;supplementary documents; testimony by representatives of the City of Renton; ■ King County: Statement invoking jurisdidion; technical studies; fiscal studies; regulatory analyses; exhibits; statements in response to applicant's submittals; supplementary documents; testimony by representatives of King County; ■ Public Agencies/Private Organizations/ Individual Citizens: Correspondence; exhibits; technical study data;testimony The Boundary Review Board has considered File No. 2178 based upon the following descriptions for the proposed Merritt II Annexation and the modified May Valley Potential Annexation Area: ■ Merritt II Annexation Area: The May Valley Potential Annexation Area, in its entirety, indudes 133 acres. The initially proposed Merritt II Annexation Area includes 20.59 acres. The City of Renton proposed the Merritt II Annexation in response to petitions from citizens wishing to join the City. Under the Memtt II Annexation, approximately 115 acres of unincorporated properties would remain in the May Valley Potential Annexation Area but would continue,for the present, under the jurisdiction 2 of King County. The remaining unincorporated area would abut the Merritt II Annexation Area on the northem,western, and eastern boundaries. The population of Merritt II Annexation Area is approximately 13 people. This area is designated and zoned for low density residential use by King County. The Area includes GreenbelUUrban Separator based upon its proximity to May Creek. The City of Renton has estabtished similar, equivalent land use designation and zoning for the annexation area. The Merritt II Annexation Area has approximately frve single-family homes (some of which may be considered for redevelopment) and vacant property suitable for residential development. Under the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan, a maximum of 17 homes would be permitted in this area including existing homes, redeveloped properties, and newly developed properties. At full development there would be an estimated 43 persons. Each e�asting and potential future residence will require a full complement of public services and facilities to ensure the preservation of quality of life and protedion of public heafth and safety. Annexation would enable Renton to control development and services to protect the portion of the environment within the May Creek Basin — including sloped lands, water bodies, flora and fauna -- within the 20.59 acres inGuded in the Merritt 11 annexation. At annexation, the City of Renton wil! be able to establish service programs for the Merritt II Area. Similarly,the City will be able to set and implement a fee/tax stnicture for the Merritt II Area. Mav Vallev Potential Annexation Area: The May Valley Potential Annexation Area, in its entirety, includes 133 acres. The May Valley Annexation Area was established in the City of Rerrton Comprehensive Plan in 1993 (updated in 199�. Incorporation of the entire May Valley Area has been proposed by King County. The May Valley Potential Annexation Area contains approximately 65 single-family homes. The current residential population of the total May Valley Annexation Area is approximately 168 persons. Under the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan, a ma�cimum of 100 homes would be permitted in this area, including the existing homes and up to 35 newly developed properties. The area would be home to an estimated population of 259 persons. An action to consolidate the entire May Valley Potential Annexation Area under a single jurisdiction at this time would enable uniform local govemance and coordinated services. Renton has pending new legislation that will provide for the May Valley Annexation Area both appropriate levels of development(one residential unit per net acre) and environmental prote�tion for the GreenbelUUrban Separator areas. Renton is capable of immediately providing accessible local govemment and a full array of services to the entire Potentiai Annexation Area. The County and City Plans intend the annexation of the entire May Valley Potential Annexation Area. However, no timeline is provided for such annexation. RCW 36.93 FACTORS AFFECTING THIS PROPOSAL The Boundary Review Board finds the following Factors {RCW 36.93.170) to be applicabte to the City of Renton's initially proposed Merritt II Annexation (20.59 acres) and to the mod�ed May Valley Annexation (133 acres) proposed by King County. POPULATION AND TERRITORY: RCW 36.93.170 (1) directs the Board to evaluate issues related to Population and Territory. For File No. 2178, including the Merritt II proposal and the May Valley Potential Annexation Area proposal, the Board considered the following issues: land area and land uses; comprehensive plans; topography, natural boundaries and drainage basins; and the IikeGhood of significant growth in the area during the next ten years. A brief review of key issues related to each applicable element is presented below: 3 POPULATION DENSITY/PROXIMITY TO OTHER POPULATED AREAS/LAND AREA/LAND USES: The record for File No. 2178 reports that the entire May Valley Potential Annexation Area, (inGuding the Memtt II Annexation Area) is established for annexation in the Renton Comprehensive Plan "Annexation Element.° Renton is immediately adjacent to the southem boundary of the Merritt IVMay Valley Annexation Area. The City of Renton Comprehensive Plan has established land uses and development standaMs for the Merritt II/May Valley Area that are equivaleM to current designations under the King County Plan. More specifically the County Comprehensive Plan designates Merritt IVMay Valley as an Urban Area. The County Plan permits Residential Uses at a density of one singie-family unit per gross acre. The City of Renton has generally designated this area for Low Dens�y Residential Uses(one unit per net acre.) Both the Merritt 11 Area (and portions of the May Valley Potential Annexation Area) are developed with single-family residential uses. Much of the developed area includes low-density development (one unit per gross acre). Development in some areas (e.g., near to SE 100th Street) is more dense (e.g., four units per acre). Neighboring areas are currently substantially developed with residential uses. Future residential development permitted by the City of Renton would reportedly be generally similar to and essentially compatible with existing housing density and open space requirements. +�* City of Renton: Renton representatives repo�#that the proposed Merritt II Annexation and the May Valley Annexation would each address and protect land area, land uses, and land densities consisterrt with RCW 36.93.170 (Boundary Review Board Act). Annexation of the Memtt II Area or the May Valley Area would reportedly be consistent with the State Growth Management Act. For example, RCW 36.70A.110 calls for cities to designate, annex, develop, and serve lands in urban areas. The City stated that incorporation of the entire May Valley Potential Annexation Area is also consistent with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan and other state and regional regutations. City of Renton officials are suppo�ting annexation of either the Merritt II Area or the May Valley Area at this time because either adion is consistent with the well-being and the interests of the local community. King County: Michael Thomas, representing the Office of the King County Executive, reported that the May Valley Potential Annexation Area is a unified community with respect to its specific physical elements (e.g., geographic features) and social elements. Further, the City of Renton has prepared plans for govemance and service to the community sub-area described as the May Valley Potential Annexation Area. Consolidated incorporation of the entire May Valley Potential Annexation Area would comprehensively address and protect land area, land uses, and land densities consistent with RCW 36.93 (Boundary Review Board Act). Consolidated incorporation of the entire May Valley Potential Annexation Area would also be fully consistent with the State Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A), King County's Comprehensive Plan,and other applicabte regulations. Mr. Thomas stated that the Merritt 11 Annexation would fail to comprehensively address and protect land area, land uses, and land densities as prescribed by RCW 36.93.170,the State Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A), King County's Comprehensive Plan, Renton's Comprehensive Plan, and other applicable regulations. Mr. Thomas stated that annexation of the entire May Valley Area offers the most efficient plan for supporting a haRnonious built community, preserving the environment, and pro#eding public heafth and welfare. A single comprehensive annexation would ensure that new development and environmental protection standards are consistent within the May Valley Area; coordination would be enhanced with other nearby built and natural environments. 4 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLANS The record for File No. 2178 reports that the provisions of the iGng County Comprehensive Plan and the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan guide annexations in the City of Renton. KiN�CouNrY: RCW 36.93.157 requires the Boundary Review Board to consider actions in relationship to the King County Comprehensive PIaNCountywide Policies. The County Pian, adopted in response to the Growth Management Act(GMA), includes goals and policies that address land uses and public seivices. For example, King County Comprehensive Plan/Countywide Policies call for contiguous orclerly growth of local jurisdictions (e.g., U-304, U-208, U-301, U-304.). Policies atso establish cities as the appropriate providers of local govemance and urban services (e.g., FW-13, CO-1, CO-3; LU-31, LU-32, LU-33, LU- 34, LU-36). More specifically, King County Policy LU-31 requires cities to designate potential annexation areas to include adjacent urban lands and to eliminate unincorporated islands between cities. Policy LU- 32 calls upon cities to incorporate lands within annexation areas into city boundaries. Similarly,the Plan supports cities as basic goveming units and service providers(e.g., FW 13, LU-31,). Crnr oF REtvTON: The City of Renton Comprehensive Plan, also adopted as prescribed by the Growth Management Act, similarly includes goals and poliaes that provide the basis for annexation, land use decisions and for public services to development in this community. The Merritt 11 Area and the May Valley Potential Annexation Area, in its entirety, are established for annexation in the Rerrton Comprehensive Plan °Annexation Element." City of Renton: Renton representatives reported that the City supports the provisions of state faw and regional authorities that mandate logical orde�ly growth of urban areas. To that end, the Merritt II Area and the entire May Valley Area are included in the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. This Comprehensive Plan was developed, as required by state law, with substantial community partiapation through a variety of venues. The resulting Comprehensive Plan and the Potential Annexation Area Plan have been approved, as required, by the State of Washington Departmerrt of Community Trade and Economic Development. More specfically, City representatives reported that annexation of Merritt 11 Area or the entire May Valley Potential Annexation Area would be consistent with City of Renton Comprehensive Plan policies addressing land incorporations. For example, the unincorporated area is included in the °Annexation Element" of the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan and is located within the Renton Potential Annexation Area. The proposed action is consistent with City of Renton Comprehensive Plan poliaes addressing annexation, including those provisions which call for inclusion of urban areas within the City (e.g., LU-378—LU-380) and provision of services to incorporated areas(e.g., LU-383; LU-386, LU-392). Similarly, Renton representatives report that annexation of the entire May Valley Area would also be consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan. More specifically: Relevant Countywide Planning Policies City of ReMon Response Policy CA 7. Adjacent jurisdictions shall identify King County and Renton have worked together and protect habitat networks that are aligned at protect the entire May Valley Annexation area as an jurisdictional boundaries. Networks shall link urban separator and continuous low density open large protected or significar�t blocks of habitat space habitat for wildlife. within and between jurisdictions to achieve a continuous Countywide network. Policy CA-10. Jurisdictions shall maintain or Renton has adopted the May Creek Basin Action enhance water quality through control of runoff Plan,which recommends solving problems at their and best management practices to maintain source when feasible, and suggests some land use naturai aquatic communities and beneficial uses. prescriptions and development restrictions toward this end. The Plan also often imposes, at the project level, in areas with sensitive lands. 5 Relevarrt Countywide Planning Policies City of Rer►ton Response Policy LU-27. Urban separators are low- The May Valley Potential Annexation Area is density areas or areas of little development primarily designated by the County as Urban within the U�ban Growth Area. Urban SeparatoNGreenbelt by King County and the separators shall be defined as permanent lov� City of Renton.The Area is intended as an density lands,which protect adjacent resource open space corridor as well as habitat for lands, Rural Areas,and environmentally wildlife. sensitive areas and create open space corridors within and between Urban Areas, which provide environmental,visual, recreational and wildlife beneflts. Policy LU,31. In collaboration with adjacent In the Renton Comprehensive Plan of 1997, counties and cities and King County, and in the May Valley Area was established as a consuttation with residential groups in affected Potential Annexation Area and inctuded on areas, each city shall designate a potential Renton's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. annexation area. Each potential annexation The Area was designated as Residential Low area shall be specfic to each crty. Density as well as pre-zoned it to R-1, one unit mauimum per net acre. Policy LU-32. A city may annex territory only The May VaHey Annexation Area is located within its designated potential annexation within Renton's PAA Renton is ready to provide a area. All cities shall phase annexations to full range of urban services to this area including coinade with the ability for the city to coordinate police,fire,water and sewer uti{ities, and surtace the provision of a futl range of urban water management Coal Creek Utility District services to areas annexed. serves the northem portion of the area and the eastern third is served by the Water District No. 90. Regarding environmental and surtace water management issues associated with the May Valley corridor,the City of Renton adopted the 1998 May Creek Basin Action Plan,which requires"full mitigation"for any future increase in density for areas draining to May Valley. In so doing,the plan attempts to make use of existing County and City policies and storm water management controls. Policy CC�. A regional open space system shall be established to include lands which: ... The May Valley Annexation Area includes (c.) Contain natural areas, habitat lands, naturai habitat area and drainage features(e.g., related drainage features, and/or other environmental, to May Creek)which flows across the northern cultural, and scenic resources third of the Area. In proposing the initial Merritt II Annexation, the City of Renton was responding to the specific interest of the citizens in that 20.59 acre area. Speciflcally, the citizens submitted a petition to annex this 20.59- acre area; property owners and residents representing at least 50�0 of the land area within ihe annexation area boundaries have signed this petition. However, the City of Renton is prepared to annex, govern and serve the entire May Valley Area at this time in the event that the Boundary Review Board determines that incorporation of this 133-acre territory is consistent with the Renton Comprehensive Plan and the King County Comprehensive Plan.) The City believes tha# there is sufficient community support to annex this larger area and that the citizens would benefd from govemance by a single, local jurisdiction. 6 King County: Michael Thomas reported that tGng County has considered the City of Renton's Merritt il Annexation proposal with the intention of ensuring a balance among the plans and regulations of the State, the County, and the affected local jurisdidions. The County also seeks to ensure the provision of sound, cost-effective govemance for community members. Mr. Thomas stated that annexation of the entire May Valley Annexation Area (as contrasted with the limited Merritt II Annexation Area) will achieve the balance that the County seeks from incorporations. More specifically, Mr. Thomas stated that incorporation of the entire May Valley Area would achieve the greater consistency with both the King County Comprehensive Plan and Renton Comprehensive Plan. For example, King County Comprehensive Plan/Countywide Pofiaes encourage annexation of urban lands and supports cities as basic governing units/service providers. Under the County Plan, annexations should occur at ihe earliest feasible date�.e.-when cities have conceptual land use plans, service plans, and available service resources). Of special interest to the County is the desirability of anne�ting smatl isolated urban areas, such as the May Valley Area. King County does not have the resources to manage land uses in unincorporated islands. Mr. Thomas stated that, consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan and the Cify of Renton Comprehensive Plan, incorporation of the entire May Valley Area would create more practical boundaries. For example, County officials believe that incorporation of the entire May Valley Annexation Area to the City of Renton —as contrasted to smaller, incremental actions--will provide citizens with more effective, efficient govemance. A single, unified annexation would permit coordinated development plans and environmental protection standards. A consolidated May Valley Area annexation would provide for unfied service areas and service systems. TOPOGRAPHY,NATURAL BOUNDARIES AND DRAINAGE BASINS: The record for File No. 2178 reports that the May Valley Annexation Area (inGuding the more limited Merritt II properties) is charaderized by topographic diversity, including level areas and sloped areas. The May Valley Annexation Area is located within the natural geographic area formed by the May Creek Drainage Basin. Annexation is a legal action which addresses jurisdidion. Annexation would have no direct effect on topographic boundaries. Thus, annexation would not alter existing topographic features. ,�«,t City of Renton: The City has prepared-- and is in the final phases of adoption of-- regulatory controls to protect environmentally sensitive areas. These controls acknowledge and address such areas as May Creek, sloped terrain, and wildlife habitats. Under the Merritt II Annexation, a 20.59-acre area will come under the authority of the City. Under the King County proposal, the entire May Valley Area (at 133 acres)will be incorporated into Renton and will come under the authority of the City. More specifically,the City of Renton will dired growth in that area in a manner that is consistent with land use standards and environmental standards designed to protect the sensitive areas in this region including sloped lands, water bodies, flora and fauna. The City wilt also provide public facilities and services designed to protect the environment within the May Creek Basin. Numerous provisions will be established to ensure contiguous open space corridors within the Urban Separator. For example,the City of Renton has: • Revised Renton's Comprehensive Plan, as part of the 2004 GMA update, to strengthen urban separator policies, including specific policies guiding development in urban separators. ■ Designated the May Valley °Residential Low Density" which is comparable to King County's "Greenbelt Urban Separator"dassification. ■ Pre-zoned approximately 133 acres the Potential Annexation Area south of May Valley Road, to the R-1 zone in 1998. The ma�dmum density allowed in this zone is one single-family detached dwelling per net acre. This is slightly less than the County's R-1 zoning on the Merritt II annexation site which allows one dwelling per rp OSS acre. ■ Adopted the May Creek Basin Action Plan in February 1998 to address environmental and surface water management issues in the May Valley corridor and require use of the 1998 King County Surtace Water Manual for review of development. 7 ■ Adopted development standards that exciude designated critical areas from density credits and encourage clustering of actual developed area away from steep slopes, wetlands, and floodplains. The Renton system does not allow transfer of density from these areas to other portions of the site. White this system does not mandate dus#ering, it does encourage both cluster developmeM and creation of Native Growth Protection easement(open space)tracts on the preserved criticai areas. A public hearing before the Renton City Council is scheduled in the immediate future to review the proposed legislation. Adoption by City Council is expected in early 2005. The City would coordinate adoption of these developmenUenvironment standards with the finalization of the May Valley Annexation. The City of Renton intends to continue into the future to work with property owners in the area to ensure the integrity of the May Valley Urban Separator. King County: County officials report that area topography and other natural features would be better proteded by incorporation of the entire May Valley Annexation Area to the City of Renton. Under the limited Merritt II Annexation, the City of Renton will direct growth and services and will enforce environmental standards in a 20.59 acre area. The County will continue to govem a portion of the May Valley Potential Annexation Area. Variable standards may result in disparate development and, thus, impact the natural environment. With annexation of the entire May Valley Area, Renton will direct growth throughout this territory, as prescribed by the County and City Comprehensive Plan. Simila�ly the City will govem the built environment and natural environmerrt in the area under (pending) City standards that are based upon, and congruent with, tGng County regulations. With annexation, development plans and environmental protection standards will be immediately consisterrt throughout the entire May Valley Area. City standards are designed to protect the integrity of the environment within May Creek Basin — inciuding sloped lands, water bodies, flora and fauna. The City will also provide public faalities and services in order to protect the environment. LIKELIHOOD OF SIGNIFICANT GROWTH IN THE AREA DURING THE NEXT TEN YEARS: The record for File No. 21678 anticipates that May Valley will likely experience growth over the next ten years. May Valley currently hosts residential development—ranging from ufian densities to low densities suitable for greenbelt/urban separator areas. However, there is considerable land in May Valley which is suitable for redevelopmerrt or new development with residential uses. Future developmerrt of residences would be permitted—with design and density requirements-- in the May Valley Annexation Area. � City of Renton: Renton staff stated that annexation of Merritt II or the May Valley Area will not directly affect exlsting land use designations, zoning classifications, or address land development. The City does, however, antiapate future growth in May Valley Area. Following annexation, all land uses would be required to meet City of Renton Comprehensive Plan policies and municipal development standards. Future development would be guided by pending municipal regulations for land uses and environmerrtal protection standards applicable to the entire May Valley Area. The proposed Memtt II Annexation would allow incremental/partial coordination of land uses and services consistent with development and setvices provided by the City of Renton. This incremental annexation is would allow the City to guide development for those properties within the Merritt li Area. The altemative plan —annexation of the entire May Valley Area — would provide the greater apportunity for overall coardination and control of new development and environmentai protection standards. King County: Michael Thomas reported that the County anticipates that some new development and redevelopment will occur in May Valley Area in the foreseeable future, as May Valley is defined as an urban area under state, regional, and iocal guidelines. These guidelines encourage growth in urban areas. Environmental protection standards will also apply to land use planning and regulation in the May Valley Area. Mr. Thomas stated that the immediate incorporation of the entire May Valley Annexation Area is appropriate so that land uses, services and amenities are subject to and coorciinated under City plans, Local plans are designed to ensure coordinated, orderly growth. Local development standards are a 8 suitable tool to protect the quality of life and enhance a sense of community. Annexation would bring local govemance; uniform development; and essentiai, reliable local sewer services, water services and other services. The City could more efficiently govem and serve the entire area under consolidated municipal standards. MUNICIPAL SERVICES RCW 36.93.170(2) directs the Board to evaluate factors related to Municipal Senrices. Additional authorities applicaWe to the Merritt II/May Vailey Area Annexation indude, but are not limited to: RCW 36.70A, RCW 35.13, King County Comprehensive Plan/Countywide Poliaes, the Renton Comprehensive Plan and its enabling regulations (e.g., zoning code). These State and local authorities are intended to ensure reasonable development regulations and adequate public services to local communities. For File No. 2178, the Board considered the following fadors to be applicable: need for muniapal services; effeds of ordinances, govemmental codes, regulations and resolutions on existing uses; preserrt cost and adequacy of govemmental services and controls in area; probable future need for such services; costs; effed on the finance, debt stn�cture and contractual obligations; and rights of ali affeded govemmental units. FoNowing is a brief review of key issues related to each applicable element. ■ CURRENT NEED FOR MUNICIPAL SERVICES;PROBABLE FUTURE NEEDS FOR SERVICES AND CONTROLS: ■ EFFECT OF ORDINANCES, GOVERNMENTAL CODES, REGULATIONS AND RESOLUTIONS ON EXISTING SERVICES: ■ PRESENT COST AND ADEQUACY OF GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES AND CONTROLS; PROBABLE FUTURE NEEDS FOR SUCH SERVICES AND CONTROLS: ■ PROBABLE EFFECT OF PROPOSAL OR ALTERNATIVES ON COST AND ADEQUACY OF SERVICES AND CONTROLS: • EFFECTS ON FINANCE, DEBT STRUCTURE AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS OF ALL AFFECTED GOVERNMENTAL UNITS: ■ PROSPECT OF GOVERNMENT SERVICE FROM OTHER SOURCES: ■ OTHER MUNICIPAL SERVICES: File No. 2178 records report #hat the Merritt II Area and the May Valley Area each require municipal services for current development. Future development will also require municipal services. The State Growth Management Act calls for the establishment of plans for providing services to local communities. The King County Comprehensive Plan has implemented state guidelines through various goals and policies. For examp(e, King County Comprehensive Plan Goal FW 12 calls for provision of adequate services and faalities for development. FW-13 states that cities are the appropriate provider of local urban services to Urban Areas. FUV-29 and FVV-30 address the need for jurisdictions to plan for and coordinate services. Numerous King County/Countywide Policies are also relevarrt to the establishment of service plans and programs that address requirements for urban services. For example, U-304 states that annexation should be supported for lands where the annexing city is able to plan for and serve these areas. Additionally, annexation is appropriate under Countywide Policy CO-1, when a jurisdiction has"ident�ed and planned for(a)full range of urban services". CO-9 calls for sewers and water to be provided to meet local needs, but cannot serve to justify development counter to Countywide Poliaes. CO-10 states that urban water and sewer systems are preferred (or required) for new development. Septic systems may continue to serve e�asting developmerrts so long as density and physical conditions are appropriate." Similarly Renton has developed policies -- through the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Comprehensive Service Plans, and other regulatory authorities — for serving all properties within corporate boundaries. City of Renton: The City of Renton has established municipal senrices plans for the Merritt II Annexation Area and for the entire May Valley Annexation Area. Upon annexation, the City of Renton would include 9 the Merritt II Area (or the May Valley Area) properties in the muniapality's Service Area. Then, as is customary,specific service plans and programs would be developed for the particular service areas. The City will provide a full array of public services to its citizens. More specifically: ■ Water Utilitv: Renton is the designated water service provider for the majority of the area. This includes the area west of SE 144"' Avenue (Ilwaco Avenue NE) and south of SE 96th Street, if extended. The area north of SE 96"' Sireet, if extended, is served by the Coal Creek Water and Sewer District and the area east of 144�'Avenue SE, if extended is served by Water District No. 90. No additional staff is anticipated as a result of this annexation. ■ Surtace Water: The proposed annexation is located in the Green Creek sub-basin of the May C�eek Basin. The site drains to the May Valley portion of May Creek,where there is existing flooding,water quality and fish habitat problems. May Creek flows across the northem portion of the proposed enlarged annexation. Because the City adopted the May Greek Basin Action Plan which requires full mitigation for future increases in surtace water nanoff from new development draining into May Valley, future development will likely have to comply with the 1998 King County Su�face Water Design Manual flow control standards. No additional staff is anticipated as a result of this enlarged annexation. ■ Wastewater. The City is the designated sewer service provider for that portion of the enlar�ged annexation area located south of SE 96"' Street, if extended. The area north of SE 96th Street, if extended, is served by the Coal Creek Water and Sewer District. ■ Sewer services are not available to all properties the Merritt IUMay Valley Annexation Area at the present time. Upon annexation, sewers will be available to residents who wish to obtain this service. Septic systems — which are monitored by the King Courrty Health Department — must be replaced with sewers only if the system is hazarcious to heafth or property. New development must provide sewer systems. ■ Parks: Staff notes that there currently is a shortfall of parks,trails and recreation facilities in the area. May Creek Park is located in the westem portion of the enlarged annexation area near Coal Creek Parkway. Staff has calculated an estimated one-time cost of$79,828 as the fair share cost that could be attributed to this annexation, above and beyond revenues that might accrue to the City from parks mitigation fees for new development. ■ Fire: The City currently serves the westem three-quarters of the annexation area under contract with Fire Distrid No. 25. ff the Renton City Council and the Boundary Review Board support this expanded annexation area upon its annexation the City will serve the whole area. ■ Police: The Police Department generally supports annexations such as this but notes that this, like all annexations, will likely increase the number of calls for service. The accumulative impad of these annexations could ever►tually require additional staff. ■ Public Works Maintenance: The division has not yet had a chance to estimate the annual cost of maintaining existing and new streets within the proposed enlarged annexation area. ■ Transnortation: Because the costs of upgrading existing access streets serving new developmerrt within the proposed annexation would most likely be bome by those developing properties there should be minimal cost to the City, at teast initially. The only expenses the City would incur from a transportation standpoint would be those associated with new signage and pavement maiicings, street lighting and maintenance costs. Schools, libraries and recreation facilities would continue to be available to newly incorporated residents of the City of Renton. Renton representatives stated that fiscal studies report that the City would be able to sustain levels of service at reasonable rates. Residents would also cease to pay County taxes for services. 10 Renton has notified other muniapalities and government agencies of the pending Merritt il/May Vailey Annexation proposals, including the various affected water districts,fire districts, emer�gency providers the King County Heatth Departmerrt, and other locai and regional agencies. These agencies have not raised any objection to Renton's annexation application and/or service plans. King County: Mr. Thomas stated that King County supports annexation of the entire May Valley Area as this action provides for a more logical municipal service area and promotes more e�aent, economic control of services than would occur with the more limited Memtt II Annexation More specifically, the Merritt II Annexation (at 20.59 acres) will result in inconsistent service provision as various County providers and locaf providers will be required to serve areas that are not cleariy delineated. Service availability may be fragmented as well. Services will be less effective, less effiaent, and more costly. Annexation of the entire May Valley Area would provide for the most efficient, effective service area. A consolidated action would facilitate cohesive policies, standards, programs, and operations throughout the May Valley Area and link this Area to the e�asting City. As an example, King County cannot provide sewers to properties in May Valley. Further, King County cannot provide other services that are both equivalent in quality and available at a reasonable cost. The City can operate services/infrastrvcture more efficiently if essential improvements are coordinated for the community as a single unit. Immediate annexation of the entire May Valley Annexation Area would be timely to address existing and potential future septic system failures. Annexation would benefit the County, because the County would cease to be responsible for providing local urban services to this community. Limited County resources could be redirected to regional and rural services. While the County witl lose taxes,the County will not experience a net financial loss, as the County will no longer need to provide services to the area following annexation. The City's commitment to provide full services is consistent with regulatory guidelines(e.g., RCW 36.70A) and citizens' preferences for the convenience of a single provider for all services. On ihis basis, King County supports annexation of the entire May Valley Area. No other jurisdiction or provider is prepared to serve the NE Rose Hill Area. EFFECTS OF PROPOSAL RCW 36.93.170(3) direds the Board to evaluate issues related to effeds of the proposal. For File No. 2178, the Boani considered the following factors to be applicable: the effects of the Merritt II/May Valley Annexation on adjacent areas, mutual economic and social interests, and local govemment structure. Below is a brief review of key issues related to each applicable factor. MUTUAL ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL(NTERESTS/LOCAL GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE: The record for File No. 2178 considers effects to economic and social interests and to local govemment structure. The Merritt II Annexation Area and the greater May Valley Annexation Area are located within the Urban Growth Area of King County. The entire May Valley Area (including the Merritt II properties) includes residential uses (ranging from low density to low-moderate density)_ There is substantial area suitable for new development or redevelopmerrt. The greater May Valley Area (inGuding the Merritt II Area) is characterized by environmentally sensitive areas—e.g., May Creek, open spaces, sloped te�rain, substarrtial vegetation, and significarrt wildlife habitat. May Valley (including Merritt II) is linked by several features to the City of Renton. For example, May Valley is bordered on three sides (south, east, and west) by Renton. Nearby properties within the City are developed with homes similar in type and density to the residential development in the Merritt II/May Valley Area. Access to Merritt 11/May Valley is available from several arterial roadways(e.g. 136th Avenue NE, Coal Creek Parkway, May Valley Highway)that also serve the neighboring City of Renton. The City of Renton provides many services to the citizens of Merritt IVMay Valley. For example, Renton provides commercial centers and professional services that are available to the citizens of Merritt II/May Valley. The City of Renton also includes employment center and recreationaUentertainment facilities that are available to the citizens of Merritt II/May Valtey. 11 City of Rer►ton: Renton representatives stated that, in keeping with the mutual social and economic interests of the Memtt II/May Valley Area atizens,the City supports incorporation of the entire May Valley Annexation Area. Renton officials report that the City is prepared to govern and to provide full services to the greater May Valley Area. Affiliation with the City would enable May Valley Area citizens to participate in govemance of the community — including land use planning, service planning, fiscal planning and planning for public amenities to serve the community King Courrty: AAr. Thomas reported that the Courrty Executive believes that it is in the best interests of all parties for the errtire May Valley Annexation Area to immediately join the City of Renton. Immediate annexation of the greater May Valley Area is consistent with State law, the King County Comprehensive Plan, and the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan because each of these plans encourages local govemance of communities. Incorporation of May Valley into the City of Renton promotes strong and unified locat govemment. State law supports consolidation—rather than fragmentation--of communities. Annexation of the greater May Valley Area is reportedly also consistent with the King County Executive's Annexation Initiative, which supports transition of lands from the County to local jurisdictions at the earliest feasible date. Immediate annexation of the greater May Valley better promotes balanced govemance than does incremental incorporation as proposed in the initial Merritt II Annexation. Annexation of the greater May Valley Area would promote a viable community. Citizens would be able to immediately begin the process of integration irrto the City of Renton because annexation of the entire May Valley Area would enable citizens to have a voice in the planning of their community. An opportunity would be provided for coordinated developme�rt under consistent municipal regulations and for the provision of efficient, ecanomic services. Citizens would benefit from affiliation with the City of Renton because incorporation of the entire May Valley Annexation Area would preserve social cohesion, support economic heafth, and protect public safety and welfare. RCW 36.93.150 permits the Boundary Review Boarci to approve the incorporation of the entire May Valley Annexation Area. This action, similarly, is consistent with the provisions of RCW 36.93 and the State Growth Management Act. CONSISTENCY WITH THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT State law provides in RCW 36.93.157 that Boundary Review Board decisions must be consistent with three sections of the Growth Management Act: � RCW 36.70A020 Planning Goals ■ RCW 36.70A 110 Urban Growth Areas � RCW 36.70A210 Countywide Planning Palicies With respect to File No. 2178, the key Growth Management issues involve the Countywide Planning Policies pertaining to land use and municipal services (RCW 36.70A.020 and RCW 36.70A.110). The Growth Management Act policiss that guide the provision of public services and that are relevant to the proposed Annexation indude: ❑ RCW 36.70A020 (1) Urban Growth: Encourages development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided efficiently. ❑ RCW 36.70l�020(2) Reduce Sprawl: Reduce inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling lova- density development. ❑ RCW 36.70�0.020(10)Environment Protect and enhance the environment, quality of life and water availability. ❑ RCW 36.70Q020 (11) Citizen Partiapation and coordination in the planning process and ensure coordination between communitie�urisdictions to reconcile conflicts. ❑ RCW 36.70A.020 (12) Public Facrlities and services: Ensures that adequate public services and facilities are available to serve land developments. ❑ RCW 36.70A110(1/6}calls for each county to designate an urban growth area. ❑ RCW 36.70/�110(3)directs urban growth to areas with existing or available public senrices and facilities ❑ RCW 36.70A 110(4)states that"(inj general,cities are the units of local govemment most appropriate to provide urban ...services." O RCW 36.70A210(1)states that cities are primary providers of governmental services within urban growth areas. 12 The record for File No. 2178 supports the finding that incorporation of the May Valley Area irrto the City of Renton would effectively address Growth Management Act criteria for incorporation of urban areas. Also, RCW 36.70A.210 requires that the county adopt Countywide Planning Poliaes to address govemance of urban areas. These policies are to be developed in cooperation with the cities. This task has been accomplished in King County, where the Countywide Planning Policies were adopted by the County and ratified by the cities. Countywide poliaes support annexation of urban areas. Similariy, the City of Renton created a Comprehensive Ptan that provides for annexation of urban areas. City of RerrtoMCing County: City of Renton officials and King County representative Michael Thomas report that the record for File No. 2178 indicates that the initially proposed Merritt II Annexation achieves minimal compliance with the provisions of the Growth Management Act because some citizens would benefit f�om joining the City. New citizens would experience consistent govemance, compatible land development, and unifled public services. Fu�ther, it is likely that atizens of the remaining unincorporated area would eventually come to seek annexation in order to redevelop properties, develop vacant properties, and/or receive services. Renton officials and King County officials report that the record for File No. 2178 supports the finding that annexation of the greater May Valley Area into the City would be fully consistent with State Growth Management Act provisions (e.g., RCW 36.70.A.210.3.b.) establishing cities as the appropriate jurisdiction to govem urban areas. Incorporation of the entire May Valley Annexation Area is necessary to altow the community to accommodate and serve both existing homes and the new residential development that is permitted in May Valley. Annexation under Option B more successfully provides for the protection of the natural environmerrt. Annexation of the greater May Valley Area more effectively establishes the City of Renton as the appropriate jurisdiction to govem this community. OBJECTNES The Boundary Review Boarc1 has considered RCW 36.93.180(Objedives), as follows: RCW 36.93.18011) Preservation of natural nei4hborhoods and communities� This Objective addresses preservation of neighbofioods. The recorci for File No. 2178 confirms that the King County Comprehensive Plan designates the Merritt II/May Valley Area and surrounding municipafities as Urban Areas. The City of Renton Comprehensive Plan anticipates annexation of the Merritt II/May Valley Area in order to guide growth here and to provide coordinated services. City of Renton:City of Renton officials reported that annexation of the Merritt II Area would constitute the first segment in a planned series of phased annexations of the entire May Valley Area. Annexation under Merritt 11 would be consistent with the objective of preserving the natural neighborhood—defined by case law as°either geographically distind areas or socially... distind groups of residents". However, annexation of the errtire May Valley Area would provide stronger links within the greater community and would encourage a more effedive connection to the City of Renton. This annexation will give all property owners/residents a voice and a vote in planning for the future preservation and development of their community. More specifically, at annexation, Renton will regulate use and development of the entire May Valley Area consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan,Zoning Regulations, and Environmental Regulations. The May Valley Annexation Area will continue to be designated for residential uses. The primary use would be single-family development at low densities (e.g., 1 unit per net acre). Away from the May Creek corridor, the Newcastle Terrace Subdivision (with 22 developed lots and 7 vacant lots) would continue to be permitted to develop residential uses at a density of 4 dwelling units per net acre. These muniapal land use designations/zoning designations are similar to the land use and zoning designations established by the County. King County. King County representatives report that annexation of the entire May Valley would more effectively advance RCW 36.93.180 (Objedive 1). This incorporation plan more effectively preserves the community as the entire May Valley Area, at 133 acres, forms a neighborhood. Further, the May Valley Area, in its entirety, exhibits many features that support its link with the City. Both May Valley and the adjacent City lands are residential in character. Demographic profiles are similar. Residents of the City 13 and the May Valley Area use common community facilities — schools, roadways, libraries, shopping centers, parks, and recreation facilities. At the time that Renton developed its Comprehensive Plan, the City made a commitment to annex the entire May Valley Annexation Area. The City has already included the May Valley Annexation Area in community planning programs. For example,the Renton Comprehensive Plan establishes the entire May Valley Annexation Area for land uses and development standards which are compatible with the buift and natural environments. Environmental protection ordinances are based upon area-wide land elemerrts (e.g., May Creek Drainage Basin). Annexation will give property owners/residents an opportunity to partiapate in a greater range of community ac#ivities and decisions. Citizens incorporating into the City of Renton would develop their pro�rties under uniform standards, benefit from similar amenities, and receive coordinated pubfic services. The proposed Merritt II Annexatio� (at 20.59 acres) will result in an unincorporated island of 115-acres, creating a patchwork community, with varying governance standards, differing senrices, and inconsistent environmental protedion standards. Annexation under the Merritt II proposal would fragment the neighborhood. Mr. Thomas stated that the County supports the annexation of the entire May Valley Annexation Area at this time, because this incorporation would be consistent with state, regional and local guidelines. Further, Rentan officials have gone to great effort to plan to effectively govem and serve this area as a part o#a unified community. Annexation at this time will benefit the atizens. RCW 36.93.180 (2) Use of phvsical boundaries, includinp but not limited to bodies of water, hiahwavs.and land contours: � This Objec[ive addresses physical features as annexation boundaries. The record for File No. 2178 defines both the Merritt 11 Annexation and the greater May Valley Annexation Area as territory that, based upon its physical boundaries, is appropriate for annexation to Renton. For example, the City of Renton abuts the proposed Merritt II Area on its southem boundary. The City of Renton abuts the May Valley Area on the westem, eastem, and southem borders. �Social neighborhoods" may also constitute boundaries. For File No. 2178 the evidence shows that the City and the entire May Valley Annexation Area share a social affiliation. The communities form a single social neighborhood. City of Renton: City of Renton representatives stated that the proposed Merritt U Annexation is based upon reasonable boundaries, including rights-of way (e.g., May Valley Highway) and individual p�roperty iines. Merritt II, at 20.59 acres, would, thus, begin to meet aiterion RCW 36.93.180(2) for annexation of lands within common physical boundaries. However, the May Valley Area provides better defined boundaries inGuding several rights-of way (e.g., May Valley Highway, 136�'Avenue NE; Lyons Avenue; 142"�Avenue NE, et al). Further the May Valley Annexation Area is inGuded in the natural geographic area formed by the May Creek Drainage Basin. Annexation of the entire May Valley Area furthe�s progress toward incorporation of the greater unincorporated area in King County. King County: Mr. Thomas reported that incorporation of the entire May Valley Annexation Area into Renton is consistent with RCW 36.93.180 (Objedive 2) which calls for use of physical boundaries to serve as a basis for incorporation boundaries. The incorporation of the May Valley Area at 133 acres would bring into the City all lands within the May Valley Potential Annexation Area. This comprehensive annexation would provide for an immediately unfied community with established physical and sociat boundaries. Annexation of the limited Merritt II Area is based upon less discemible physical boundaries creating confusion with respect to community identity and service provision. RCW 36.93.180(3)Creation and preservation of loqical service areas: This Objective addresses the provision of logical services areas to serve the properties within a jurisdiction. The record for File No. 2178 indicates that the annexation of Merritt 11/May Valley Area into the City of Renton will support the creation and preservation of logical se►vice areas. The City's Comprehensive Plan establishes the City as tfie provider of services for the entire May Valley Annexation 14 Area. More specifically, Renton has regulatory authority and responsibility to provide public services to all of its citizens under the King County Comprehensive Pian,the City Comprehensive Plan, other City pians and regulations (e.g., Comprehensive Sewer and Water Plans, Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan). Further, the Growth Management Act establishes cities as governmental units and service providers. City of Renton: Renton representatives reported that the Merritt II Annexation begins to support the creation and preservation of logical service areas (RCW 36.93.180 - Objedive 3). The greater May Valley Annexation would permit the implementation of logical service programs throughout the May Valley Potential Annexation Area. Incorporation of the greater May Valley Area would further the achievemerrt of this criterion because this annexation would enable a greater number of citizens to be included in the City of Renton's service area and, thus, to receive consolidated municipal setvices. For example, the May Valley a�nexation plan will allow Renton to provide senrices that will proted the natural environment(e.g., May Creek Basin). These services will also help to proted the built enviro�ment(e.g., address septic system failures, provide storm water and surface water management systems). At annexation, the City of Renton will include the incorporated properties in its Service Area. Then the City would provide (direcily or by contract) a full range of services. More specificatly, with respect to sewers, Renton representatives testified that the City is prepared to extend sewers to any area within May Valley. The City will convert properties from the ewsting septic systems to sewer upon request by the property owner. The City may establish Local Improvement Distrids, as appropriate, for future services. The City wouki also provide (diredly or by contract) for fire service and police service to the newly incorporated properties. Similariy, the City would provide for public facilities such as roads and storm wa#er management systems. The City is plsnning for rebuilding of these facilities as necessary to protect public health and safety. Residenfs would also have access to schoots, libraries and recreation facilities. King County: Annexation of the entire May Valley Potential Annexation Area into Renton is consisteM with RCW 36.93.180 (Objective 3) which calls for logical service areas. The incorporation of the entire May Valley Annexation Area provides a logical service area wherein coordinated, consolidated, and efficient se�vices can be provided to all properties in NE Rose Hill. When Renton developed its Comprehensive Plan, the City made a commitment to annex the entire May Valley Area. Under the Comp�ehensive Plan and other regulatory authorities, the City also made provisions to immediately govem and serve the entire May Valley Annexation Area. City offiaals have stated that services (e.g., water, sewer, fire, etc) can be provided to the May Valley Annexation Area either directly by the City of Renton or by interiocal agreements with other service providers. Mr.Thomas, King County, reiterated that annexation is necessary to address public service requiremerrts. For example, various King County service providers have expressed concerns about the ability to provide coonfinated, economic services that are timely and efficient based upon the limited resources available to serve the e�usting unincorporated island area. More speciflcatly, there are concems related to public health and welfare based upon the fact that the area is currently served by septic systems. Some of the septic systems are fragile. Renton provides sewers only to properties within City limits. The City has made a commitment to sewer all propertiss that are annexed to Renton. Mr. Thomas stated that annexation of the entire May Valley Annexation Area is a more balanced action from a financial perspective as well. More specifically, King County will realize a benefrt because, while the County will not receive revenue from the May Valley Annexation Area, the County will also not incur costs for providing service to the area. While the tax base is uniform throughout King County, there are variations among communities in revenue collection and costs for service. King County has not calculated the specific revenue%st balance for the May Valley Area, but revenue/cost studies conducted for the greater County have indicated that the cost of serving local urban residential communities exceed revenues obtained from residential properties. Service requirements must be correlated to community needs—e.g., development 15 levels, development design, demographic characteristics. King County must rely on multiple service providers;where multiple providers are required to serve an area,there are greater c�sts for service. Annexation of the Merritt il Area (20.59-acres) is inconsistent with Objective 3 as this limited annexation further complicates an already compiex service system. More specifically, the Merritt II Annexation wili resuit in ineifective service provision because various County providers and local providers will be required to serve areas that are not clearly delineated. Service availability will be more fragmented. Services will be less effedive, less efficient, and more costly. More spec�cally, if the City of Re�ton annexes only 20.59 acres then King County will receive less funding but will retain responsibility for serving the remaining 115-acre May Valley Area. Annexation of the entire May Valley will promote logical, streamlined, economic service provision. RCW 36.93.180(4) Pr+evention of abnormallv irneaular boundaries: This Objedive addresses the prevention of abnoRnally regular boundaries in the establishment of annexation areas. The record for File No. 2178 provides two points of view conceming the achievement of Objective 4 under the proposed Merritt 11 Annexation. There are statements in the record reporting that the proposed Memtt II Annexation achieves this criterion because the area planned for incorporation follows property lines and that all properties are located within the boundaries of the greater May Valley Annexation Area. There are also statements in the record reporting that the proposed Merritt (I fails to achieve this criterion because the specific boundaries result in a "T�� shape which does not constitute a reasonably normal, regular boundary. The record for File No. 2178 reports that incorporation of the greater May Valley Area (133 acres)would provide a regular boundary based upon the incorporation of the entire Potential Annexation Area. City of Rerrton: City representatives stated that the Merritt II Annexation does provide for reasonably regular boundaries based upon rights-of-way and prope►ty lines which define the proposed action. Merritt II would constitute progress toward correcting existing irregular municipal boundaries. However, with Memtt II, portions of the intended May Valley Potential Annexation Area remain under the jurisdidion of King County rather than under the intended jurisdidion of the City of Renton. City representatives stated that annexation of the greater May Valley Area provides for more reasonable, regular boundaries by incorporation of the entire Potential Annexation Area and, therefore, better achieves Objed'nre 4. King County:Mr. Thomas stated that annexation of the entire May Valley Area ir►to Renton is desirable to achieve the reasonable boundaries necessary. The greater annexation area would facilitate coordinated land uses and offer a more effective, efficient solution to provision of services. Merritt il, as initially proposed, woufd create a more discontinuous than regular boundary. This boundary would not promote effedive govemance. RCW 36.93.180(51 Discoura4ement of multiale incorporations: RCW 36.93.180 (5) is not applicable to File No. 2178. RCW 36.93.18016)Dissolufion of inactive special purpose districts: RCW 36.93.180 (6) is not applicable to File No. 2178. RCW 36.93.180(7)Adiustment of impractical boundaries: This Objective addresses the adjustment of impractical boundaries. The record for File No. 2178 indicates that the City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan establishes the City as the authority for local govemance (e.g., regulation of land uses and the provider of all public services and facilities)for the May Valley Annexation Area. Incorporation would create more practical boundaries with respec:t to establishment of uniforrn land uses and development standards. Annexation would creaie more practical boundaries for service as well, as that incorporation would place the natural environment and built environment under City jurisdiction. 16 City of Re►�ton: Renton representatives reported that incorporation of the Me►ritt II Area would be consistent with Objedive 7. This action would achieve progress toward adjustment of impractical boundaries because a portion of the area that Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates for incorporation would be integrated into the City. City officials stated, however, that annexation of the greater May Valley Area would create more practical boundaries for govemance and service in this community. The City is willing and able to annex and serve the greater May Valtey Area. King County: Mr. Thomas stated that the initially proposed Merritt II Annexation area does not create a practical boundary. Rather, annexation of this limited area fragments community borders and thus splinters community identity. Further, the proposed boundaries will complicate the provision of pubtic faalities and public services. For example, the proposed boundary will create confusion for emergency service providers. In comparison, Mr. Thomas stated annexation of the entire May Valley Potential Annexation Area into Renton is consistent with the standard for the creation of practical boundaries. Of special irrterest to the County is the desirability of achieving annexation of smaller isolated areas, such as May Valley, because annexation provides residents with local govemance and needed public services/facilities. The greater May Valley annexation creates a practical boundary, which will enable coordinated development and streamline the provision of public faalities and services. RCW 36.93.180 18► Incorporation as c'rdes or towns or annexation to cities or towns of unincoroorated areas which are urban in character: This Objedive addresses the annexation of unincorporated urban areas to existing cities to provide for local governance. The record for File No. 2178 indicates that Merritt II and the greater May Valley Area are located within the Urban Growth Area established by the King County Comprehensive Plan. The definition of the May Valley Area as °urban" is supported by the State Growth Management Act. The City of Renton has an adopted Comprehensive Plan which designates the entire May Vatley Area as a Potential Annexation Area. City of Renton: Renton representatives stated that the initially proposed Merritt II Annexation would be consistent with this Objective because a portion of the urban area would be incorporated into the City. However, City officials would also support immediate annexation of the entire May Valley Area in order to fully implement its Comprehensive Plan goals for the May Valley Potential Annexation Area. The greater May Valley Area annexation would also serve to address King County irrterests by transferning urban unincorporated land from regional jurisdiction to local jurisdiction. King County: Mr. Thomas reported that the entire May Valley Area is within King County's Urban Growth Area boundaries. Incorporation of the greater May Valley Area into Renton is more consistent than the more limited Merritt II Annexation with the goal for achievement of incorporation of urban areas. Annexation of the Merritt It Area does not materially reduce the unincorporated area. This limited action does not achieve incorporation of all designated urban lands. Annexation of the May Valley Area would bring the entire area into the junsdiction of the City of Renton. The action would promote uniform development and services appropriate for this urban territory in its entirety and would preserve the specific existing environmentally sensitive areas (e.g., the May C�eek Basin, urban separators and greenbelt.) RCW 36.93.1$0 19) Protection of aaricultural and rural lands which are desianated for lonq term productive aqricultural and resource use bv a comprehensive plan adopted bv the countv leqislative authoritv: RCW 36.93.180 (9) is not applicable to File No. 2178 as the Merritt II/May Valley Area does not include or concem any agricultural lands. This entire May Valley Potential Annexation Area is within the Urban Growth Area as established by King County and approved by the State of Washington. 17 CITIZEN TESTIMONY Six citizens provided testimony concerning the proposed Merritt II Annexation and the proposai for expansion to include the entire May Vatiey Annexation Area. The majority of speakers stated support for annexation of the entire May Valley Area. Other speakers reported support, in principle, for the May Valley Area Annexation but would prefer to delay incorporation to permit additional community review of each annexation proposai to ensure that future govemance and service plans wouid be consistent with the irrterests of each of the communities in the May Valley Area. Speakers stated that annexation of the entire May Valley Area wiil likely occur based upon the provisions of the Courrty Comprehensive Plan and the City Comprehensive Plan. However, some speakers noted that each plan calls for orderly growth and phasing of annexation based upon citizen irrterest. There was testimony that annexation of the Memtt 11 Area would be consistent with each Comprehensive Plan but that annexation of the entire May Valley Area may be premature as citizen partiapation in annexation planning has been limited in the greater May Valley Area. It was stated that public opinion should dictate annexation boundaries and timelines. Community members supporting the May Valley Annexation reported that this action is consistent with the intent of comprehensive planning for land annexations. Those speakers testified as to their preference for joining Renton in orrler to participate in local govemance, land use planning and service planning efforts for the May Valley Annexation Area. More specifically, citizens favoring annexation stated that affiliation with the City of Renton would provide certainty with resped to the future development of their community and with respect to protection of the existing natural environment (e.g., open spaces,water bodies.) Citizen support for annexation is, however, reported to be conditional at the present time. Citizens expressed concems that the City of Renton does not yet have adopted standards for development and for protection of the built environment and natural environment within May Valley. The citizens seek formal action from the Boundary Review Board requiring that, prior to effecting annexation, the City of Renton ensure the adoption of regulations which are equivalent to (or exceed) King County regulations for land use controls for residential development (e.g., density levels, development standards) and for public facilities/services for the May Vatley Area. Similarly, there was testimony that the City of Renton must ensure the adoption of standards for the protection of environmentally sensitive areas (e.g., water bodies, greenbelt, urban separators). Standards are reportedly required to preserve the integrity of May Creek and the surrounding May Valley Area. With such local standards in place, citizens believe that annexation would permit appropriate residential development as well as enhancement of urban separator, greenbelt, and other sensitive areas. More specifically,there was testimony that,with annexation based upon appropriate local regulations: ■ The May Valley Area would be better defined as a social and physical community which would enable citizens to partiapate effectively in, and realize benefds from, local governance. ■ Land uses(and development standards}would be consistent throughout May Valley. • Coordinated (more reliable and less costly) services would be available in the entire May Valley Area. � May Valley would realize improvements to public health and safety. For example,those persons who wish to develop or redevelop land are seeking to annex because septic system limits made it impossible to repair, remodel or build additions to existing homes. Frequently, new development is limited or prohibited on vacant, othervvise usable land. The availabifity of sewer systems would also serve to proted the natural environment. ■ The May Valley community would benefd from overall improvement in the quality of life. 18 BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FINDINGS AND DECISIONS The Boundary Review Boarci conducted a review of the proposed City of Renton NE Rose Hili Annexation (File No. 2178) based upon the record of written documents and orai testimony. The Board's deliberations were directed to the state, regional and local regulations relevaM to the proposed adion. The Board focused upon RCW 36.93 (Boundary Review Board Enabiing Ad); RCW 36.70A (Growth Management Act); King County Comprehensive Plan/Countywide Policies; City of Renton Comprehensive Plans, RCW 35.13 (Annexation of Cities); and other relevant regulations and guidelines. The role of the Boundary Review is to implement these existing laws; the Board does not have the authority to make law or policy. The Boundary Review Board reviewed File No. 2178 with respect to its legal authorities, in order to consider the following options for annexation: ■ The Merritt II Annexation could be accepted as proposed and supported by the City of Renton, if this incorporation achieves the basic requirements of RCW 36.93 and other applicable regulations (e.g., the State Growth Management Act, the IGng County Comprehensive Plan and the Renton Comprehensive Plan). This action would recognize the interests of citizens who seek annexation to the City of Renton and the interests of those citizens who prefer to remain under the jurisdidion of King County. ■ The Merritt 11 Annexation could be modified as proposed by King County to inco►porate the May Valley Annexation Area (up to 133 acres), if the May Valley Annexation achieves the basic requirements of RCW 36.93 and other applicable regulations (e.g., the State Growth Management Act, the King County Comprehensive Plan, and the Renton Comprehensive Plan). Such a modification can be accomplished pursuant to RCW 36.93.150, which establishes the standard by which the Board may revise annexation boundaries to aties. This altemative would require all properties within the May Valley Annexation Area to immediately be incorporated into and placed under the jurisdiction of the City of Renton. • The Merritt II/May Valley Annexation could be denied in its entirety if it is determined that these altematives are inconsistent with RCW 36.93 and other applicable regulations � In conducting a review of the File No. 2178 record, the Boundary Review Board finds that the materials submitted pursuaM to the City of Renton application and the materials submitted pursuant to the position of the opponents are extensive and detailed in their content. The parties have provided considerable bodies of material supporting their positions. The Board has deliberated upon the complete recorc) in order to come to a decision for the proposed Merritt II Annexation and the proposed alternative May Valley Area Annexation. A summary of the Board's deliberations is provided below. Speaking with respect to the initially proposed Merritt II Board members offered the following comments: ■ The Board finds that the proposed Merritt II (20.59 acres) is based upon petition of the citizens of the area. This action is consistent with the provisions of RCW 35.13. ■ The Board must determine whether the proposed Merritt II Annexation meets the provisions of the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A), the Boundary Review Board Act (RCW 36.93), the King County Comprehensive Plan, and the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan. RCW 36.70A, the King County Comprehensive Plan, and the Renton Comprehensive Plan each call for logical, o[derly growth of communities. County and the City planning documents, which are approved by the State of Washington, establish Renton as the local jurisdiction slated to govem the entire NE Rose Hill Area. As such, annexatian of Merritt II (an incremental po►tion of the greater May Valley Potential Annexation Area)is not consistent with the plan for logical, orderiy growth. Merritt II also fails to fulty achieve other provisions of these regulatory authorities(e.g., planning goals and policies establishing cities as the units of local govemment; planning goals and poliaes calling for cities to be primary providers of urban govemmental services within urban growth areas). 19 ■ The Board must determine whether the Merritt II Annexation meets the requirements established by RCW 36.93. RCW 36.93.180 defines the objectives to be achieved with an annexation. The Board deteRnined that the proposed Memtt II Annexation addresses the objectives as foilows: RCW 36.95.180 MERRITT 11 ANNExn'noN OBJECTIVE 1 - PRESERVATION OF NATURAL ANNEXATION EXCLUDES PROPERTIES THAT ARE A PART OF THE NATURAL NEIGHBORHOODS AND COMMUNITIES NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY OB.IECTIVE 2-USE OF PHYSICAL BOUNDARIES,...BODIES OF ANNEXATION IS BASED UPON PHYSICAL BOUNDARIES THAT MAY BE WATER,HIGHWAY5,AND LAND CONTOURS DIFFICULT TO LOCATE (E.G., PROPERTY LiNES) OBJECTNE 3-CREATION AND PRESERVATION OF LOGICAL ANNEXATION EXCLUDES PROPERTIES THAT ARE A PART OF THE LOGICAL SERVICE AREAS SERVICE AREA. FRAGMENTAT�ON OF THE AREA HINDERS SERVICES. OBJECTIVE 4 - PREVENTION OF ABNORMALLY IRREGULAR ANNEXATION CREATES (RATHER THAfV PREVENTS) IRREGULAR BOUNDARIES BOUNDARY IINES. BOUNDARIES FRAGMENT AND MAY H►NDER SERVICE OB,IECTNE 5 - DISCOURAGEMENT OF MULTIPLE DOESNOTAPPLY INCORPORATIONS OBJECTIVE 6-DISSOLUTION OF INACTIVE SPECIAL PURPOSE DOES NOT APPLY DISTRICTS OBJECTIVE 7-ADJUSTMENT OF IMPRACTICAL BOUNDARIES ANNEXATION CREATES (RATHER THAN ADJUSTS) IMPRACTICAL BOUNDARIES WHICH ARE INEFFICENT AND MORECOSTLY TO SERVE OB.IECTiVE 8 - INCORPORATION ... OR ANNEXATION TO ACTION BEGINS INCORPORATION PROCESS BUT FAILS TO INCLUDE CITIES....OF UNINCORPORATED AREAS WHICH ARE URBAN IN CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES WHICH ARE URB/iN IN CHARACTER. CHARACTER OBJECTIVE 9-PROTECTION OF AGRICULTUR,4L AND RURAL DOES NOT APPLY LANDS... in the matter of File No. 2178, the Board finds that the proposed action (Merritt II Annexation) does not fuily achieve the preponderance of standards as established in the Growth Management Act, King County Comprehensive Plan, the City of Renton Comprehensive Pian, RCW 36.93, and other state and local guidelines for incorporation of ufian areas. � Speaking with respect to the proposed modification of the proposed annexation to inGude the greater May Valley Potential Annexation Area (133 acres), Board members offered the following comments: � The Board must determine whether the May Valley Annexation (133 acres) meets the provisions of the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A), the Boundary Review Board Act (RCW 36.93), the King County Comprehensive Plan, and the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan. ■ The Growth Management Act, the King County Comprehensive Plan and the Renton Comprehensive Plan each establish Renton as the local jurisdidion slated to govern the May Valley Area. As such, incorporation of the entire May Valley Hill Annexation Area(133 acres)will promote logical and orderly growth as envisioned in the Grov►rth Management Ad. The greater May Valley Annexation is, similarly, consistent with King County and C�y of Renton guidelines. Annexation of the greater May Valley will provide for coordinated governance and service under the uniform jurisdidion o#the City. 20 ■ The Boarci must deteRnine whether the May Valley Area Annexation wouid achieve the requirements established by RCW 36.93. RCW 36.93.180 defines the objectives to be achieved with an annexation. The NE Rose Hil! Annexation (184 acres) addresses the objedives as follows: RCW 36.93.180 MAY VALLEY AREA ANNEXATION (133 AcREs) OBJECTIVE 1 - PRESERVATION OF NATURAL ADVANCES BASIC CRITERION AS ANNEXATION INCLUDES ALL NEIGHBORHOODS AND COMMUNITIES PROPERTIES THAT ARE lNCLUDED IN A NATURAL COMMUNITY OB.IECTIVE 2- USE OF PHYSICAL BOUNDARIES, INCLUDING ADVANCES BASIC CRITERION AS iT COINCIDES WITH ESTABLISHED BUT NOT LIMITED TO BODIES OF WATER, HIGHWAYS, AND COMPREHENSIVE PAA BOUNDARIES LAND CONTOURS OBJECTIVE 3- CREATION AND PRESERVATION OF LOGICAL ADVANCES 9ASIC CRITERfON AS RENTON CAN CONTINUE/BEGIN SERVICE SERVICE AREAS TO ENTIRE AREA IN A WAY THAT ADDRESSES PUBLIC WELFARE. COUNTY WOULD CEASE TO HAVE RESPONS461LITY FOR SERVICE. OBJECTIVE 4 - PREVENTION OF ABNORMALIY IRREGULAR ADVANCES CRITERION AS REGULAR BOUNDARY LINES SUPPORT A BOUNDARIES UNIFIED COMMUNITY AND STREAMLINE SERVICE PROVISION OBJECTIVE 5 - DISCOURAGEMENT OF MULTIPLE DOES NOT APPLY INCORPORATIONS OBJECTIVE 6-DISSOLUTION OF INACTIVE SPECIAL PURPOSE DOES NOT APPLY DISTRICTS OBJECTIVE 7-ADJUSTMENT OF IMPR4CTICAL BOUNDARIES ANNEXAtION CREATES (RATHER THAN ADJUSTS) IMPRACTICAL BOUNDARIES. ACTION RESULTS fN LESS COORDINATED SERVICE AREAS WHICN ARE INEFFlCENT AND MORE COSTLY TO SERVE OBJECTIVE 8 - tNCORPORATION AS CITIES OR TONVNS OR ADVANCES CRITERION AS THE ENTIRE URBAN AREA IS INCORPORATED ANNEXATION TO CITIES OR TOWNS OF UNINCORPORATED INTO A LOCAL JURISDICTION. AREAS WHICH ARE URBAN IN CHARACTER OBJECTIVE 9-PROTECTION OF AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DOES NOT APPLY LANDS... • King County is not the proper jurisdidion to govem and serve May Valley. King County is mandated to provide for regional governance rather than for local governance. Further, King County officials report that the County is encountering chalienges which hinder the provision of effective governance and reliable services as required for the preservation and enhancement of public health and welfare. ■ The City of Renton is the proper jurisdiction to immediatety govem and serve the May Valley Annexation Area. More specifically: - Annexation of the entire May Valley Area wili provide for a community that is unified under a single set of govemance standards to guide land uses. May Valley is established as an urban area under state law. The City of Renton is presently establishing coordinated planning and regulations for land use and land development to ensure that the unity of this residential community is maintained, that regulatory protection is provided for environmentally sensitive areas, and that the quality of life is preserved for the citizens of May Valley. Under the jurisdidion of Renton, citizens can continue to work tagethe� with City o�cials to ensure permitted residential uses and public amenities to address the local bui�community and ambient natural environment. - Annexation of the entire May Valley Area will provide for a community that is unified under a single set of govemance standards for public services and public facilities. Renton representatives testifled that the City can provide May Valley citizens with fire, service, water service, sewers, roads, storm water systems, schools, libraries, parks, and recreational facilities. May Valley citizens would benefit from reliable, orderly, efficient, economic services. 21 ■ Regulatory authorities and guidelines do not establish a specific timeline for incorporation of communities into local jurisdidions. However, laws and guidelines do cail for logical, orderly growth of communities under the aegis of locai jurisdictions. For example, RCW 36.93.150 permits the Boarcf to modify an annexation to increase the number of properties to be incorporated into a city to achieve logical, orderly growth. More specifically, modification of boundaries is permitted to address govemance and service issues that are identified for the May Valley Potential Annexation Area. In the matter of File No. 2178, the Board finds by a unanimous vote that the Merritt II Annexation, as modfied to include the entire May Valley Annexation Area (133 acres), would advance the preponderance of standards established in the Growth Management Act, King County Comprehensive Plan, the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan, RCW 36.93, and other state and local guidelines for incorpora#ion of urban areas. CONCLUSIONS: In the matter of File No.2178,the Washington State Boundary Review Board finds, by a unanimous vote, that the application of the City of Renton to annex the Merritt II Area demonstrates that the proposal with modifications, described herein as the May Valley Annexation (approximately 133 acres), is consistent with and advances: (1) pertinent objedives specified in RCW 36.93.180; (2) pertinent factors specified in RCW 36.93.170; (3) pertinent regulations specified in RCW 35.13; (�4) pertinent standards speafied in RCW 36.70A - Growth Management Act; (5) pertinent standards specified in the King County Comprehensive Plan/Countywide Policies; (6) pertinent standar�ds specified in the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan; and (� other pertinent state and local regulations. The approval with modfications of the application of the City of Renton to a�nex the May Va11ey Area (133 acres) is permitted by RCW 36.93.150. The approval with modifications to the application of the City of Renton to annex the May Valley Area (133 acres) is timely based upon the City of Renton's current and historical commitment to guide development and provide municipal services to this area. Annexation will enable the City of Renton to provide for the govemance, proteciion, and service that addresses the health, welfare and safety of its citizens. (Note:Under sfate law, the Cify of Renton musf adopt an Ordinance or Resoludon afl5rming the May Valley Annexadon following acdon by the Boundary Review Board. Under state law, the City must confirm the action as approved by the Boundary Review Board. Altemativety, the Council may decide not to pursue the action. Howevei the City cannot modify the bounda�les that have been approved by the Boundary Review Board.) 22 NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY THAT, for the above reasons, the action proposed in the Notice of intention contained in said File No. 2178 be, and the same is, hereby approved with mod�cations as described in Exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. ADOPTED BY SAID WASHINGTO STATE BOUNDARY REVIE BOARD FOR KING COUNTY by a vote of I O in favor, in opposition, and abstentions, on this 27 day of September, 2004, and signed by me in authentication of its said a option on said date. WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY ames Denton, Chair FILED this 13 day of S� u►�R-� , 2005 BY: enora Blauman, ecutive Secretary 23 EXHIBITS EXHIBIT I CITY OF RENTON MERRItT IUMAY VALLEY: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF MODIFIED ANNEXATION AREA BOUNDARIES EXHIBIT II CITY OF RENTON MERRITT II/MAY VALLEY:MAP OF MODIFIED ANNEXATION AREA BOUNDARIES 24 � EXHBIT 1 GlTY OF REN'fON MERRI'tT IUMAY VALLEY: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF MODIFIED ANNEXATION 1QtiREA BOVNDARIES � �.��`,�� V � 2004 � �XPANDED MERRITT II ANN�XATION LEGAL DES CRIPTION �A Board For King Co V�ew That portion of Government Lot 1 in SecCion 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying westerIy of thc west linc of thc p1aC of StonegatE, ac recorded in Volume 17� of Plats, Pages 62 through 63, inclusive, records of King County,Washington; TOGETH�12 WITH Government Lot 2 of said Section 3; and TOGETHER WITH that portion of Government 3 of said Szction 3,lying easterIy and northeasterly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 4055, and l�ing southeasterly and easterly of the�xisting City Limits ot'Newc:istle, a.c annexed by Res. 45; and TOGETHER WITH that portion of the plat of Newcas[le Terrace, as recorded in Volume � 87 of Plats, Page 30, recvrds of King Cour�ty, Washington, lying within the southwe5t quarter of'the northcast quarter oF said 5ection 3; and TOGETHER WTI`H that portion of the southeast quarter of the northwe�t quarter of said Section 3, lying northerly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by prdinance No. 3972, and lying easterly of the existing City Lirnits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No_ 4055; and TOGETH�R W1TH that portion of the south half(1/2) of Se�t.ion 34, Township 24 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washing[on, Iying southerly of the northerly right-of-way margin of SE May Valley Road (Thos. Rowse Rd., SE Coalfleld Way, Maycr�ek Rd.), and lying easterly of the ea.�terly right-of-way margin of Coal Creek Pkwy SE (136`h Ave SE, Newcastle Rd. Rev.), said northcrly and easterly ri�h[-of-way margins also being the exis[ing City Limits of Newcastle, as annexed by Res.45_ H.\Filc Sys\LND-L,nd Subdivision&Surveying Rzcordc�L�VD�p� .(�bal Dzticriptionc�0107.doc .' • •� • • � t � � . , � � d �� , ` � �' � _ . . p �!J"�� . � • o :i1�� ; r�Q�� ` I/1111� � � � . .��,''� � � ' � �'�� E� ��11 ' . , . "� • ■ �a � 'v' �� , �' ��'� � � � � ��i. • � �� ndUv� � �Di,.�.. � ��,.�,i�� : r� .. �a� � � -- � iui?,�''� ��i��y � - • .e■4. � ■ rt�r.�, / ��:y2�� .� ■ ►I. W�s, � /�/ `� ■ �... �:.�� //� . � � �R ,�►�� ■�w ��1 �// .; � ■ �� ■I�II�i1��.rLL�11� ��IfL�'sivY� ■ � !1!L'L'i!t�11Gi/� �/�j.� "•� - �,�`� ��. ■.��..■ �� '�F�� 11" - � .� .a. . . .� !l�� i.�� 1�Rl1��■��►,� r!, � r ' ��]ECC�� ,�.� :i��,t� �■�i�[C�� n��ceu, � �/�� t� �. � ��iye� �ii� ��■i ir1 111�/�1��! ::��t��► I/�1 Y1��i�� 7'+ �� '.i� ��l111�■�■■■�■ m��ZaR• �• �� v� � � . ��i�uu►� .�► � � �� _�, .I��rr��.�� I��i �► ftLuv�u ��►�s��i�� ♦ F, a�■ —•�:► • •� �■ ��.: .►� �i;�� i. �,I,�Sa��_�� • ��I��I�� r�ut,��,��j:: -+■11LIClEt+�� ma�..In.� �n11�i •� �� r . . ii�u�l��t11�i�� a '��■. ;: ' � ��/ � �� r �3� �. �1� ♦�1-�� • YYG�ac�� ► //A�� `�� . . , �•• � •' ■. �� IIIIlI11A� ••��,r�� ' + p ,..,�'�� 'o' "'�i!1�1�� '•'•'. � ■ utlll��u .' r p+a� ¢i�l., . ;:�� ..... --� �W3us a� �. uc�ur311� IIIIIIr�a�� i7�I�� .1� '-�t% ■� �� ►=� ■ =� ♦ ��1�� aaj�i •�� ■�ur— g�I�r.��n�r.,n� o� ��i�: �115 E�� •��►�::� � �_��i /�� ,.: � _ r: �, .�.W�.i.urr. �� .. ._ _ r,--- �;;"� 111.`Q�;.. :� t, � . � �U � G"�� —��►�j • �► 9 �i'�i �r iYG1 �U� � � ��►Ri!�� -s � �� , ' � � w a . � �t Rc•i"�•�•:r!��r6:�1� El111�l� I �•��i►i� �� -- r� � �I:o �� I� �� r_.► �s� - � ■ . ��_ .� �� . .�� uu,�►+ �� i�� , � � �► � �� • �✓ � I r�• � ::+ �A � ��— i��t►�� ♦ ��111�� r-� � : i��1�1�1,, � � ��` �I� � �i�� ■� �1L+JL'/ltl.��I��iwt+e�:si � � 1 � �G�� _ _ !J�'�—� IlLlfl!{�1�� ,� ■ ,�/� Ij� � :• `�a --�� . -.�� CIII�� J�n�=��w��i ��% j� �i'i�i�� -�'��:q1/—, ' � � �f I� 7 . � � ;. �� w � ��/�,,': � � .� � , ► � ;� � .�,.. .� I II��► :� � �::. =1�� .� -•/. . ►, .- _ .. . . Ir�r� � . I �■ �� `S : , � . . � I�■u �� \ ■r,,�� ' �� , . r,�,� �� 11� ,,�,r, � , \ 1 : �� ■� �� • i��n� =�� 1 ■ :"►��;:;... .��r � .� ...� '—: _...i ■.rr ::::� G�' ::��► - � =- ��.� � �� 7 ■ � F13l�Cli�lli�l� �! ■ ■ W'�F:�� = �� ■ � =�: :A.ii �� ll�fl�� I � �r,�► � �� . ■ � .■' :��,.�ii�� i'i�� uuu�rei i�[I �� =�� '�".i� 11�11�1111�1�1�3 � � IV I -- � � t- �/�e+� �� / t�� .��. -_�� '' � �.o,,;� �� \ � �►�I.A��I� F�i : � �1��L1� � 0'',�tli� � ■ . �,� �•. e �,- �� • �� _= : '��'� ■■■■a. �� a:�/ • �ua/tlu��r� .. � � �- � ��=��t� IA�� lI�R��l�� = *r - ,�'� �.� F:.3.■■ �w�� u�uuei�� ii .... �1��la� :�� ya■ � �/ ` Il,� �u�� !'� i��l��:w�� ■■' �� ■��IIs� �-„' •� �� u.0 � ��a�� IIII��i►�� " �'■'�,' ' ��■ �� C� �i�n� . � m�� ..:"t�lll�� .� �. ■ ��; ��u- -�.�■ ..C•�� *. .� i �.•�� .H7 ��a �� ,��;. � ��■■.��ill�ii ■ � �� .�. �� ,,�iW� � --�li�� .�rN�a :Q � � i ♦ �� '� � �, i: i// ►�, �� - �� ■ � � �: _�►'i:�DZii: _ ► : � �� " . " " E �:'- �V� � y �.. '- -1��= =►�� .i...•. ■ � _ � � � ��L■��11�►f� ►�7�1:�1/� �I�� .. �� a�� — �� 11� i� �� - - -- ��i�� a��u_ ��, ii111� D :� � �►%� IYlIOlt3� �� I�� - r� � onm� ��1��1�I��1�.��h�'� � �1�� o�� . • , , , , ' • � / , " � „ :�:::;❖::::'re:•:�;:;�:�:•:v:�?}�}'r;?:�r<i;u:e:::?:::: • •� —:�:;•::'r.:ti�:::�<:v:r: r � � 1• • � • 1• . I , " J •' C� �� / � ' • ' � � �. •'� � • Page 1 of 1 Donald Erickson - Merritt II Annexation — Changing Effective Date :x«�6'.4$!`.5„'a:Te'.S:i..e�::roS.&53;�W�u..h�;.k•w JS��:cbe.h. ' .:.,,.,x.wm�G„#-Rex��.�,•..,w;.:r L^':3i�.i1Q? J3.^i�'�':...m?�'::.:.,. ...y...a�.�v^^.S,`�"�:� '4i'�X&t^�'�< �'.'.,:ei!�v� ��x".r�x^.R�',C4,y�".•`:..iN�fsE��?VkM1i9•<��' . , n �a .,i From: Peter Hahn To: Erickson, Donald; Hanson, Robert; Lind, Rebecca; Pietsch, Alexander; Wilhoit, James; Wine, Marty Date: 12/15/2006 10:59 AM Subject: Merritt II Annexation —Changing Effective Date CC: Zimmerman, Gregg .... Don, I committed to having a more realistic schedule for the Duvall widening in January. I am giving you this now, and it's probably the only thing with this project that has been ahead of schedule. The schdule provided by the city's engineering consultant shows bid award by end of March 2007 - if absolutely nothing at all happens to add delays. My best judgement call is that the probability achieving this level of perfection is zero. With $2 million of K.C. funding at stake, I think we need to do the following: 1. We absolutely need to change the effective date of annexation beyond March 31, 2007. 2. I would start preparing all the documentation for this change now, but leave out the New Date. 3. If I had to pick a new date today, I'd consider picking May 30. However, I would suggest that we wait for closer to the date change ordinance time (maybe February?) to select the final date because we'll know much better (I'd like to think that 60 days of cushion is enough, but too many other things have gone differently than anticipated - and property acquisition alone can go different ways with different calendaring issues - for example, if you have to go to condemnation). Peter Peter Hahn Deputy Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Ph: (425) 430-7242 Fax: (425) 430-7376 E-mail: pha...h..n.@ci_.re.n...ton.wa.us file://C:�Documents and Settings\derickson�I,ocal Settings\Temp\GW}00OO1.HTM 02/12/2007 Page 1 of 1 Donald Erickson - Re: Merritt II Annexation, Phase II Revised Implementation Date .�.>'.«:d•`.�'i�.K:.�A �!'.�N.;'�:v`'v ..�. . • xIX:ti'ti"v •...:�&��.. .�� .S�"auu<��.. :'. ......S�.i�Mks�Y�a»��$k'k4RC;�•' ..�•:".?'�d.^.s i�c:w.:. �...�',� . . From: Peter Hahn To: Erickson, Donald Date: O1/17/2007 12:40 PM Subject: Re: Merritt II Annexation, Phase II Revised Implementation Date CC: Hanson, Robert; Lind, Rebecca; Seitz, Jim ,.... _...... . . ... _ ......... . You are fast. Looks good. I would suggest scheduling this for mid Feb (or even early March) and then put in the effective date -June 1 (I would actually use 7une 5, 2007 so that we get one last Monday, June 4, to get council approval for something related to this project) looks "safe" today, but this project has consistently disappointed us. By waiting 3-4 weeks before we go to council, we'd have that much more certainty whether all the loose ends are in fact being resolved. There is even a small chance (very small) that we might advertise for bid before the end of Feb. My main point is that it's embarrassing enough for me to have changed it once in 2006. Twice is a lot worse - but I really want to avoid no. 3 change if at all possible. By the way, I want to clarify the funding that you reference as "$2.2 million": the 2003 ILA has K.C. pay all direct costs related to the project. They have been paying all along for things like consultant design. The point is that the amount at risk with a premature annexation is whatever is left to be billed for the construction, and that is just a guess, of course, pending the bid amounts and change orders (if any). So you might want to say "estimated $2.2 million." Thank you, and, again, I do feel bad about this. Peter Hahn Deputy Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Ph: (425) 430-7242 Fax: (425) 430-7376 E-mail: phahn@ci,renton_.wa_._us »> Donald Erickson 1/17/2007 11:10 AM »> Peter, Attached is a revised draft ordinance and agenda bill for this second extension. Please review these drafts and let me know if they look okay. We have time to make revisions. Thanks, Don file://C:�Documents and Settings\derickson�L,ocal Settings\Temp\GW}00OO1.HTM O1/18/2007 � � •+ Page 1 of 2 Donald Erickson - Re: Merritt II annexation effective date e'x:.\"�;m.....::.:;>•�,.r��......:�..s.,.i", ' ' :.::�:.?.;.�.. ...:'a'r3'v:\l�?.:S•ia�:�a.v�.T#..i�:'t:�r.�;.:,;.,..�.p:...;w.�..'r:"^^.'""q"h��':.::£-�aN..a�.e�#.Gu4�.;+:E0.�&%"k�ha.;r..m+�,'&&��:A d+ttNWN�':�.,ra.Gw..2w.m:xeR.a;,ddis^rr.�rcReehm�,tt� . , u";;..WMt � A; ..:F�P.0 ��v�':�2�'`.. "' . From: Peter Hahn To: Erickson, Donald Date: 02/15/2007 4:48 PM Subject: Re: Merritt II annexation effective date CC: Lind, Rebecca We are on the same page. This will help. Peter »> Donald Erickson 2/15/2007 4:44 PM »> Peter, This item extending the effectuation date for Phase II of the Merritt II Annexation is now scheduled for Council consideration on March 12, 2007. The ordinance they are asking to adopt would extend the effectuation date from March 31, 2007 to June 5, 2007. If the last date needs to change please let me know as soon as possible. I'd had to have to go back to Council for third time with another extension request. Don »> Peter Hahn 02/15/07 4:20 PM »> We were waiting to hear from K.C. on how they would handle the request for about $1.5 million more. Then we need to figure out how to find $4.2 million more. We were hoping that the date change ordinance could wait till about mid March, so that we'd know all the budget implications. I had thought that Marty Wine would talk to you about this. June 5 as the new effective date was still ok, except for the budget unknows. In the next 2-3 weeks all of this should be coming together. So if this ordinance can be scheduled for council action on March 12 or 19, that would be a big help. Peter Peter Hahn Deputy Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Ph: (425) 430-7242 Fax: (425) 430-7376 E-mail: phahn_@ci.renton..wa_._us »> Donald Erickson 2/15/2007 4:04 PM »> Peter, Are you and Gregg okay with this? Was a decision made by Jay Covington to move ahead with the implementation of the annexation because the County no longer had funding? file://C:�Documents and Settings\derickson�L,ocal Settings\Temp\GW}00OO1.HTM 02/19/2007 j � `• Page 2 of 2 Please let me know. Thanks, Don »> Bonnie Walton 02/15/07 3:52 PM »> FYI... Phase II of the Merritt II annexation will become effective 3/31/2007. (Ord 5207) Please provide the property owners mailing list by the first of March for preparation of the mailing. How will addressing be handled for this phase?The ordinance was adopted under the old addressing requirements, but will become effective under the new addressing ordinance. Bonnie, x6502 file://C:�Documents and Settings\derickson�I,ocal Settings\Temp\GW}00OO1.HTM 02/19/2007 � � /i � i � ` � I / ` a � � � � r---------�.__.�_______ _._ �� 3 �� iQ � i � � ; � ; ; � � � � � o � ��,L}5�� a . c_c,-�.c.C, � � .'�r'�ti as �. +�4E 3� �. � --� � � / �R,, ,� . 'j� � �'TL�S4 � 1 si L ,!/ L r� (,{��1 /.�`)'C �� C; � • . i � �, -`;��:� � , .`�,�z � ��t� ,• �� `�� "3� � 1�� i,�1'zy}�, ) � � �2L��'�"� ' �■ ( ,"'�� .�x � V` � � (1�\or�� 0 5��+ti � t � 0 M �.�4� �,c�w�� i � ��l� ,-►-, �� , 5 �ju � ► �-��Y.'.zc-. �'z�tf"� 1 a-''�`f��' i a�z.�e�s, sh�5 ba;�»5; � ) �vrh�1'IvvscS 2�Y1�+ . �b a,-. �a-n r��, cas� �} rt��I+� e% l7 � � � .. h� d 1 ti � N�� ' �-° � � R ` ,;t� .� .'c�1 :� � �� c I,�+��. _ — ` ��, ��./ � r � �y . ir _ ��u Y r* c�`�; � . � � ;�f k � — � � ' � � � , � � � :�; �� 1 n � �? °�' (� ��Lu� � y � �. �`'� � �' t � s G r � c�3 `; i�y � �� s � � �� l!1 ;,, ,� � � ` J� D .J .� �. � � � � �J � ��.�w � � � 1 U NE � '2 A� " � � s.. �--, � cs ��r �� ' � � '�;r � "'� L I r � �� ` � ^ � �� ,�r � . �- �, � � ,}-c:t�1 ( /^�. _ �� i � e ° �� a � p o 0 S � Q 4 0 0 w �„ � O � � Q W � � � � 53 � � o aY � �I � � � i ; �• � May ✓alI e J' R � o 0 9 � ' '" d o � � s� z 3f�'��'�� `:�: i %�' ' , � a �/ '`�� '�` `�. � � ' C> � ' �r' " � : ■� � • M '�� • � � � ` �, �f � t■ « � 6 � w �■ p��, �' ,� � /;J' � � � . �0 � � ,T ,r-t �, s C � � � • ��' ` � (J�r�' �` � p �9�� °` � ' � f � �' t Sti � th Ct - � qG��`�2 � ; r ' v � � � ❑ o 0 � ' � '� � p � � ` � �6 � � -- � � a , � �, n o E 10 d � Q 4 � b � o �1 � a � oao � � b c� � p d a 4 � � 4 � d t�d � O r' FA, c. � l�' � 0 m p � p ['�o �' � � ° � a � ° a Q ° a �� 9 SE 1 ❑ O n � Q p o0 0 `�Y O a _� � �' o �4 � p� Q o0 � C� � 0 ZS 4 This document is e yraphic ro�resentation,not guarmteed q � to �y xcuro<y, tmded fw cily Wa�oxs only ond baaed the Dest i tormation awilable of the dote shorn. � Thie mop is fw diaplay purposn only. Proposed Merritt II Annexation o 600 1200 Figure 3: Existing Structures Map 1 : 7200 � Existing Structure Gti�Y 0,,�, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning ___ COfpOfBte LImItS � _� ♦ Alex Pietsch,Administraror "`�� G.Del Rosario � Original Annexation Area ��NT�$ �September 2004 � Expanded Annexation Area : � May Creek Greenbelt/Urban Separator PID Size Sensitive Current Develop. Assessed Public (ac.) Areas (%) KC Potential* Value Ownership Zonin 342405 9106 1.13 90% R-1 Low 34,000 9113 0.04 90% R-1 Low 65,000 9110 0.55 90% R-1 Low 190,000 9109 0.56 90% R-1 Low 154,000 9026 0.58 90% R-1 Low 180,000 9108 0.56 90% R-1 Low 153,000 9016 0.83 90% R-1 Low 148,000 9072 0.75 70% R-1 Low 212,000 9099 3.90 50% R-1 Medium 203,000 9117 1.41 50% R-1 Medium 62,000 9116 1.03 50% R-1 Medium 21,000 9058 0.98 70% R-1 Low 321,000 9086 6.78 10% R-1 Hi h 78,000 032305 9116 0.74 0% R-1 Low 236,000 9112 1.72 0% R-1 Medium 259,000 9164 1.66 0% R-1 Medium 304,000 9287 10.06 5% R-1 Hi h 327,000 COR 9005 5.78 5% R-1 Hi h 293,000 9002 6.33 5% R-1 Hi h 220,000 , 9071 8.48 5% R-1 Hi h 252,000 ', 342405 9047 6.11 50°/a R-1 Medium 387,000 ' 9048 1.82 80°/a R-1 Low 382,000 9063 1.23 100% R-1 Low 80,000 , 9019 0.45 5% R-1 Low 217,000 ' 9076 0.65 0% R-1 Low 176,000 9077 0.75 70% R-1 Low 42,000 ' 9050 1.26 90% R-1 Low 263,000 9051 3.97 100% R-1 Low 180,000 032305 9069 5.82 15% R-1 Medium 368,000 9247 6.17 10% R-1 Hiah 454,000 9073 8.54 0% R-1 Hi h 757,000 ' 9019 2.50 0% R-1 Hi h 82,000 9038 2.70 50% R-1 Medium 273,000 9111 1.62 0% R-1 Low 110,000 9102 1.0 0% R-1 Low 372,000 9108 4.81 0% R-1 Hi h 616,000 TOTALS Develo ment Potential LOW MEDIUM ffiGH Sensitive Areas Equal to or less than 75% 25%to 74% Less than 25% Assessed Value Ratio Greater than 2.0 1.0 to 1.99 Less than 1.0 Parcel Size Less than 1.5 acres More than 1.5 but less 3.0 acres or larger than 3.0 acres , � . � Cedar River Greenbelt/Urban Separator PID Size Sensitive Current Develop. Current Pub�ic (ac.) Areas (%) KC Potential* Assessed ownership Zonin Value 222305 9134 0.89 100% UR Low 45,000 9105 0.47 100% UR Low 34,000 9104 0.47 100% UR Low 69,000 9155 1.65 100% UR Low 283,000 9139 1.32 100% UR Low 179,000 232305 9037 2.61 30% UR Low 308,000 9169 192* 0% UR Low 12,000 9135 0.78 0% UR Low 132,000 9180 1.24* 10% UR Low 134,000 9078 1.25* 0% UR Low 57,000 9007 2.83* 0% UR Low 109,000 9015 3.23* 0% UR Low 80,400 9088 0.63 100% UR Low 218,000 9097 0.72 100% UR Low 55,000 9133 0.67 100% UR Low 209,000 9032 1.61 100% UR Low 44,000 9132 1.12 100% UR Low 152,000 9010 1.41 100% UR Low 242,000 9070 1.48 100% UR Low 145,000 9123 1.71 100% UR Low 263,000 �, 9086 0.34 100% UR Low 84,000 �I 9012** 1.31 100% UR Low 145,000 ', 9127** 0.50 100% UR Low 137,000 ' 9158** 022 100% UR Low 18,000 9108** 0.25 100% UR Low 33,000 9013 1.38 100% UR Low 292,000 9121 1.62 95% UR Low 179,000 9030 1.53 90% UR Low 172,000 9199** 1.17 100% UR Low 302,000 KC 9125** 0.92 100% UR Low 197,000 KC 9137 0.15 100% UR Low 152,000 9122 0.23 100% UR Low 144,000 9177 0.23 100% UR Low 138,000 9178 0.21 100% UR Low 177,000 9014 1.96 5% UR Low 235,000 TOTALS * Indicates only portions of indicated parcels. ** Indicates parcels under common ownership Develo ment Potential LOW MEDIUM HIGH Sensitive Areas Equal to or less than 75% 25°/o to 74% Less than 25% Assessed Value Ratio Greater than 2.0 1.0 to 1.99 Less than 1.0 Parcel Size Less than 5.0 acres More than 5.0 acres but 10.0 acres or lessthan 10.0 acres larger � � . , 1 South 179t'' Greenbelt/Urban Separator PID Size Sensitive Current Develop. Current Public (ac.) Areas (ac.) KC Potential* Assessed Ownership Zonin Value 3223059018** 4.90 25% R-1 Hi h 228,000 9078** 1.85 60% R-1 Medium 234,000 9072 6.11* 15% R-1 Hi 412,000 TOTALS * [ndicates only portions of indicated parcels. ** Indicates parcels under common ownership Springbrook West Greenbelt/Urban Separator PID Size Sensitive Current Develop. Current Pubtic (ac.) Areas (ac.) KC Potential* Assessed Ownership Zonin Value 062205 9098 0.92 0% R-1 Low 240,000 9049 8.32 18% R-1 Hi h 223,000 9061 4.94 60% R-1 Medium 407,000 9051 1.73 40% R-1 Medium 290,000 9143 1.82 0% R-1 Medium 238,000 9001 0.64 0% R-1 Low 134,000 793100 0007 15.51 8% R-1 Hi h 599,000 COR 0005 2.00 0% R-1 Medium 355,000 0010 2.06 0% R-1 Medium 293,000 0025 0.38 0% R-1 Low 1,000 0021 0.51 0% R-1 Low 479,000 0022 0.51 0% R-1 Low 436,000 0023 0.68 0% R-1 Low 473,000 0024 0.68 0% R-1 Low 498,000 TOTALS Develo ment Potential LOW MEDIUM HIGH Sensitive Areas Equal to or less than 75% 25%to 74% Less than 25% I Assessed Value Ratio Greater than 2.0 1.0 to 1.99 Less than 1.0 Parcel Size Less than 1.5 acres More than 1.5 but less 3.0 acres or larger than 3.0 acres � 1 ^ Springbrook East Greenbelt/Urban Separator PID Size Sensitive Current Develop. Current Pubtic (ac.) Areas (ac.) KC Potential* Assessed Ownership Zonin Value 338832 0220 0.33 0% R-1 Low 234,000 0230 0.27 0% R-1 Low 230,000 0240 0.28 0% R-1 Low 211,000 052205 9045 4.36 0% R-1 Hi h 297,000 9077 5.06 0% R-1 Medium 1,519,000 9085 5.99 0% R-1 Hi h 205,000 9046 3.56 0% R-1 Medium 251,900 9305 0.38 0% R-1 Low 192,000 9323 0.38 0% R-1 Low 270,000 9332 0.25 0% R-1 Low 198,000 9043 0.39 0% R-1 Low 378,000 9339 0.47 0% R-1 Low 274,000 9136 1.41 0% R-1 Medium 114,000 9137 0.93 0% R-1 Low 236,000 9240 2.03 0% R-1 Low 557,000 9331 1.23 0% R-1 Low 192,000 9243 0.47 0% R-1 Low 224,000 9234 0.34 0% R-1 Low 217,000 9269 3.46 0% R-1 Medium 226,300 9042 1.51 0% R-1 Low 276,000 9007 1.51 10% R-1 Low 278,000 TOTALS Develo ment Potential �I LOW MEDIUM HIGH �I Sensitive Areas Equal to or less than 75% 25%to 74% Less than 25% , Assessed Value Ratio Greater than 2.0 1.0 to 1.99 Less than 1.0 i Parcel Size Less than 1.5 acres More than 1.5 but less 3.0 acres or larger than 3.0 acres �� -� �. King County � � ��: ; , . Department of Transportation 201 South Jackson Street � �'��'` Y�•`.-�'� �� Seattle, WA 98104-3856 � � � ` June 12, 2006 Gregg Zimmerman, P.E., Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works Department City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Zimm an: �r�� .�� Thank you for your letter of May 16, 2006,regarding the Duva11 Avenue NE Widening Project's environmental process. As noted in your letter,the City of Renton is acting as the lead agency for the project. The "Interagency Agreement between King County and the City of Renton Regarding Improvements to Coal Creek Parkway, from the Renton City Limits in the Vicinity of Northeast 23rd Street and Northeast 24th Street to Southeast 95th Way"establishes the roles and responsibilities of our respective agencies. I appreciate the notification that the City of Renton intends to annex the Merritt Annexation area as soon as the award of the construction contract takes place and prior to issuing a"Notice to Proceed"on the project. I concur with your understanding that since the annexation is taking place prior to construction, the project will become a City of Renton project and should follow the Renton guidelines for permitting. I also appreciate you ensuring that King County staff will receive information regarding the project and have an opportunity to provide comments during the environmental review. Please understand, however,that if the annexation does not take place as expected, King County cannot allow any construction activity to take place within the county right-of way without the proper county permits. I have referred the question of amending the interagency agreement to the King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office for legal review. If an amendment is necessary, I will have staff � MOBILITY FOR THE REGION •��Z°ZM Gregg Zimmerman June 12,2006 Page 2 contact Rich Perteet, Interim Transportation Design Supervisor,to effect the necessary changes. Thank you for the opportunity to work with the City of Renton on this project. Sincerely, � ' � ' Harold S. Taniguchi Director, King County Department of Transportation cc: Peter Ha.hn, Deputy PBPW Administrator—Transportation Rich Perteet, Interim Transportation Design Supervisor James Wilhoit, Project Manager Linda Dougherty, Division Director,Road Services Division(RSD),Department of Transportation(DOT) Paulette Norman,P.E., County Road Engineer, RSD, DOT Jennifer Lindwall, CIP and Planning Section Manager, RSD, DOT Rick Brater, Manager, Engineering Services Section, RSD,DOT Mary Coltrane, Intergovernmental Relations Coordinator, RSD,DOT _� i' � --`. ��T��►t�� '�� ,■ �yl�.'�� ► I = � � � ■ � i". , -�/ '��i► �I� � �+ E��1�ii�� ., � '/. � --.,�■ .� ' .��11! _ ',� - o'�s�� ,�� -,. m:•.a ►`j ��:� ,/ ; 111\� --- ' /; .� , � � ��,�7 ►■� � � i�� / �� ' �1� , �� ! .. � i .�i�� . ��,i� ' \,,,, ' � �� ''/ � �:nuit�� +'�l� -■ , �� . �� , -, ::�� _a� � , � :�,,.�� ,�t� ��rr� � �� . ��`�: ►,:��s� �• ai i1,. � ,,� �� 1\��\��/�O �U�q , � ;rZ 1�� :�ru�u�:�a�uuu��ii�s�ur �� -„— '�- ��! Iu.�'�O��IN1iY��pp mm�u ■ !�� 1ILWi�1611�I fr �.r ��'1� �� II�UlI♦�� t♦s .= � �]LC ,,,�� p::�!��L�iei�e er�.i��r��n�� ,}��_ � ■aGr r�-7 +��l91L��/�� _`� I�iL'�G'CY9U �1, 71L R• ..., � ��q IIA■�■■■�■rt��s�R�'i�'i��+�iu�uvvu i:��:��nn�np� � � ' � r..� ;.� �� E_ . ,.� � . r�r.r.LL:��mc� � �i♦ 4 t►� �'��t�u��i�: �*. a=� = "�,� �r�� .: :P�i��Q �� I G�/Il��r'w��_ �� a� ��I ��-+� �ir� 4�.�' . �. v y� �� u�f��[i�111�1�,?��i��n�I�LI[lEt�� maE�I!! � ��IIII�► �� a! �� ::r �,�' ii�i Yi.�ac��\\�II\�� q]�� II�� n�1iw+��n�IIAlIIIA/ ��,I�f �� 1fh ��•�' _� �/1;ua�a�.■�..,.ue�u�a p+�i�l�uu� vr o:��r � =F,:��r �'�'�� Y�i IIIIIIr^i►� �A�I*.f�':If � ��r�Is�� r►nr��n�r��o��IIU� � I �It�n�■ --�— ¢�1. ,.; �7.�� r y�'/��`►6��tiu�s��::��►i: �JII=��r Oi��►��^��►�r�s�.+]�'�i ... ��Ub iQiYN C■��►� ��c w.�=��U �C G��v� y��/�� .� , ,_ ,. a��r��`Cy��r /5��\t"� � r� � ��7��i� �hnr•6±�,,. �I � i� ��mr � �� w � �,, � ',�� `� � 'T'i��"'�u�1UL'11�� I� �� %��c�� we�e*��i��111��r r-��C �i�t'i��cr��:= �r � r : ■.�u�wu��_ L��'� 4 �. �.�r�n••��'�-�--��Q,�. � �. .S�e: . ' 44� , ' ,'.�� .11��nu�rh��■..■; 7��_� ��11-A—`.�'-' .�:�� '�=�I� �� f � ��:��"`�.,.�:��:,II'11� � `\� �-� �� ■ ..� � � . .. �� .�.G. ,,,� :��.A ■ f .; : �: . �■YidII`i�,'r�r, y i�� , a�i�i11C��,�� l■y�' ■�� e��i�� ,�� ' ,�� ta. , �,�� • � � i��1�� a�'��,.�' '�� Y�►� , � iti 1��€��i��/� , ��I� ��■ � �- _ •( _ r,.�;..5.� �..��43i�� _� � � ■ - ri u��a�e��l�� i��<R■ � .� w�y��■ �G�� L��Y�t��1 -I� . —��w sYl�I�I�Y��1��1..,: 1 ��,= ■�.�■ r.n�R a��r dU� �� E �1 � r�� .�f��a�I� ��p�� t�P r-.�� r� - � ��11111111111�3� . �.�,� �1��L--�L��3li1Ei�i� r T ��• � e.■�� ►.��A�•� � �� _—, � ,��`�,�j' uaa� �,w�\� r.�� w!R'�IlU�� .. •.� � �,�..., w � �: = 7�_ ■■�■a. �I ,� �.■. /��.�.■■�ee��e�� e �— �.�.��n.��n►a'ri�.F�i��nua��suuti��■� +r�' ='�"��. ' �� r �rr�raya�� — �� yi�ar.�oa��n�i �q��i1��l��q�� ' • Il�j �� ■ �Iu�e��ea�inm C i9a�m�1111■C� V�■ ■�� II C� �� ;wu��a•nnm�� v►�� 1�- ��111��1 ��r��,iu�Bu�i��i:I�nnn��.��l�lll�� a.:�n■�� ,�' ��i'i u u��r.��. �.� ��• '�► • � .� �.�'u� ■��Li�'I ""'�� ¢ �� .� �+�,•. � �7�r��ntf�illlll■ .��ii�i � � C..��I/� �_�'2��II i W� �i'�� ,_��'�■ �� ■��, ■ :..e.:_:�. ►•• _ D��:� : �, ��—��r-±r 7 ` �rnu�u��::\\a�'°: � � : �c' � ��■ � ��:m. ■ ��i1�i=■■ � '- u: tilliC�.�� .;�:'1� �� :::►�o�ai�r��a�eu�, �. � �'` C.. . ;,.,��.—..u ` U�� 11� � I' � '�� 4�� 1ri � � � �� 4 + �ri�luus� I �I/�U �. ` �► Ic�a�Cl101l�■ —ii� � �� ,� -■.�ien-ull�l.��ur7.�Zyi� .I�u �� '� �.s�.� — v RC� :��:.��:��I'�4111' �i � ��I��iY' ■ . �� i� �R�� u"!�'o��ll��►i ��IOi. OIIII.. � .ii:� _ ��I�1 ..o�� I�i�'� � tif■ �� i �� ' y-111�� R �� I1117111111 UU".q � ?.•'�■�Q��%/'. r�-,�—�� i�� 111197Y1111 pp:{p ��11[a'w� �� Fi��i Q� �� p�un11 nuun mwmu��n��l�� _ � • ��i� � ■':'��\ �� IU�J�'�e�an •• uq� tiY o�c-� � _��, ,v:'!'�• ',,�� g'�'avi e � "'�i7 i'a o =n)n��U� =y �� u�u�'au.i' aa zmr c� =s S 3''e'nm �`��ac��ici '.�B o un 5 G�� II!■ �■u��. ��rauu a ��a ni .�n�i�= 'nnu=j� sin�`�lJ�'��'�'r'��: �i i�� ■ .• � � -7 ■ i mnn.� ��a s �i �c��e��:r�: =�nr e ' � � � ��-_ ��V�V�i��a i i.' __i, . •,,�� - I uunn%f �///I��I,�L:.l. �'�' ■ ■.=c'a. �.�� ' Illlitl�d� ��a�■�,��.�.�r.. - �� 9�t1 ��II:� ��j �E.y _:r�uy� �a�..��E� :::i=.r-.:��I�T.I��Iri��R��=. - • � � • ' � ' � ' � � 1 11 111 � � ��:: r . i 111 =- .- . . , . • i �� . . � . ' . . �� ' .�. -� � . � � Renton � - _� � ; � ' �.xi ,� ;s ;� --- Renton City Limits . ;, Parcels ��. � _ .�� :. � � � �,.'"�`�. . < _ _ . - a�� 9 � , 'iG t ' .:s �,+� t,. ,. ... � * � � _ Renton Aerial " • ;� = � � � �. ___� � ,. �� , , � _ __ - ----- � � , . �� v*� k� � � # �. ��y } � ; � R' P��" � " � �* .,�« �x�'�'�'� �� ;'�� :� � .� �.� � �. -Y �� ,� �. $ � • y.,� � , " � ; � ��:� Y� � � .�.+�r �•�:#"�^q.,�r�t�� M �, 4� , a„ j"��,y� � ��. _ � � �. ♦ � �. y�w��yj&I"'l! �X y ��..��., •'4��,::� � ° . _.{�.� , ��,� �.. �.>-'7: ��iq,. �v ..w, . � . ,i- ,�.� .-��° 'x i e+ �.��'_ `��, ` �.�;� �i.�` �` . ��p, ��. � f � # s� f y�"°!� d ii�.: .+f. .�a — ,__—._.,�....i°'""'y�:,,r '�"�ef•'*M� a �� r,y � �` � , ' =� � - � . . , 'f � " ,J� r � /%///(/ VI ` 1� ��/g��"' " Y : r . ♦ �� ' '� " � �lia � ' '� � "-*� �;' t�ll / � x,t�,,iy�' �.> �� v�• �iR�. 'T „"`, �r '.P � . � S� � �`� �. � -�,. z y � ` { � :�� '� �� ;-� ,� �� x:: ,�� : � f ;�,.�� 4i� 03 2305 ��4� �� : � ,�� - y � ...�,�'�'m � �. ♦� � . '�' . ..Y t� l�+.-._.. 9 . . .�"�.16:.��_ � � "4 • <} Y � l A � �� . �f`�"�r�� ? -r:� I Ua,�yr,� f� O�rO , �.w �� i `� ,��'`�' � � , .� �. � �� << _ �. M �. ..��r,�r�� - . �� p�d D� z�� - , ;�.: --- �� . . � �� .�� J - � , w ,- � � � � _� � ' � �'' � �� 1� �. ��I� � W � � �i�;, _, , s_ ' - �,- ��r �.` R � i. f, . . -. . • �. N SCALE 1 : 3,459 200 0 200 400 600 FEET http://rentonnet.org/MapGuide/maps/Parcel.mwf Thursday, July 08, 2004 7:21 PM �; CITY OF RENTON � Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning K y Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Alex Pietsch,Administrator September 3,2004 Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary Washington State Boundary Review Board Yesler Bldg.,Room 220 400 Yesler Way Seattle,WA 98104 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR 15-DAY TIME EXTENSION—MERRITT II ANNEXATION Dear Ms. Blauman: Thank you for your letter of August 30,2003 notifying the City that a public hearing has been scheduled for September 27"',2004. We understand that pursuant to RCW 36.93.100 the Board is required to make a finding within 120 days after the filing of a request. King County apparently made such a request on August 27,2004. T'his would establish a deadline of Friday, December 24,2004, Christmas Eve. In light of the fact that many potential participants may be on vacation the week of December 19�', 2004 we are respectfully requesting that the Board consider extending this deadline to January 15,2005. Thank you in advance for the Board's consideration of this request. Sincerely, �J�, Alex Pietsch Administrator cc: Jay Covington Rebecca Lind Don Erickson� -rr�: `�f�^�ne�eaEeens4A4erritt-#z�B^��Eensiefl}fr:�se\eer R E N T O N 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 �This paper contains 50%recyded material,30%post consumer �H E A U O F T H E C U R V E - Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County Yesler Buildirig, Room 220, 400 Yesler Wny, Seattle, WA 98104 Phorie: (206) 296-6800 • Fax: (206)296-6803 • http://wzvw.metrokc.gov/n�triexations July 13, 2004 � ��'�;�� f JUL 1 � 2004 Ecovch,+�c�;rv�i..o�t�stn;T City of Renton ��{,y�o��oons, Attn: Don Erickson, AICP , nr,�n sTr,:.T,=,,q�;_i f,�v;�;r. Senior Planner 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: SUMMARY File No. 2178 - City of Renton - Merritt II Annexation Dear Mr. Erickson: Enclosed is the Summary prepared by Boundary Review Board staff for the above-referenced Notice of Intention. The Summary will be sent to the Boundary Review Board members, along with the Notice of Intention, as part of the agenda packet for the next regular monthly Board meeting. If you see any corrections or clarifications which should be made in the Summary, I would appreciate hearing from you at (206) 296-6801. Sincerely, �; ��-u�J �-�J Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary Enclosure: Summary FORM 11 - Washington State Boundary Review Board �y For King County Yesler Building, Room-�8, 400 Yesler Way, Senttle, WA 98104 P{torte: (206)296-6800 • Fax: (206) 296-6803 • {tttp://wzuw.metrokc.gov/rrrt�cexatioris August 2, 2004 �" w�- � � ; '�:,�;�.,,.._ � _.- �� a � " ; �� ..w , � ��i�� a� � City of Renton : F��- :.- �- _ ; _ `��uT. Attn: Don Erickson, '�-� '_=Y>.;��.`�..�:a,�=�,,.�;;;,NG AICP, Senior Planner 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: NOTIFICATION OF OFFICIAL FILING File No. 2178 - City of Renton - Merritt II Annexation Dear Mr. Erickson: We have received approval from King County engineering staff of the legal description for the above-referenced Notice of Intention. The Notice of Intention is now considered complete and has been officially filed effective July 13, 2004. Therefore, the end of the forty-five day period allowed for invoking the Board's jurisdiction and requesting a public hearing is officially Au�ust 27, 2004. You will be advised of any further changes in the status of the Notice before the Board. Please be aware that any future final ordinance or resolution on the proposed action must incorporate the legal description approved by King County engineering staff, including any revisions made in response to the engineering staff review. Sincerely, Lenora Blau an Executive Secretary cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council Lydia Reynolds-Jones, Manager, Project Support Services Diane Murdock, Department of Assessments Harry Sanders, Records and Election Division Paul Reitenbach, Department of Development and Environmental Services Michael Thomas, Office Management and Budget FORM 12 , . � ;;, CITY OF RENTON � Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning K y Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Alex Pietsch,Administrator July 9, 2004 State of Washington Boundary Review Board for King County Attn: Lenora Blauman,Executive Secretary Yesler Building, Suite 402 400 Yesler Way Seattle,WA 98104 Subject: NOTICE OF INTENTION TO EXPAND THE CITY OF RENTON CORPORATE LIMITS BY ANNEXATION Dear Board Members: As required by Chapter 36.93 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW), the City of Renton hereby gives notice of intention to annex territory hereafter refened to as the "Merritt II Annexation". This annexation is proposed under the direct petition method in accordance with the applicable provisions of Chapter 35A.14 of the RCW. The petition has been certified by the King County Department of Assessments. This annexation would incorporate into the City of Renton approximately 18.24 acres of territory for the provision of urban services. To assist in your consideration of the proposed action, the required articles and exhibits are enclosed and numbered in accordance with the Board's suggested format. The $50.00 filing fee is also enclosed. Should questions arise during the review of the information and exhibits provided with this Notice of Intention to Annex,please contact Don Erickson, Senior Planner, at(425)430-6581. Please send notices and other communications regarding the proposed annexation to: Don Erickson,AICP, Senior Planner/Strategic Planning Department of Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, ��e��;�, -G�l��.JtX.�.- Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Mayor Attachments 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N T O N �This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer A H E A D O F T H L C[i R�'E �g NOTICE OF INTENTION PROPOSED MERRITT II ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF RENTON I. BACKGROUND/MAPS 1. The description of and reason for seeking the proposed action: The proposed action is to annex approximately 20.59 acres to the City of Renton. Annexation is sought by the proponents to develop under City of Renton regulations and processes and to receive Renton public services. The annexation was initiated through the 50/50 Method of Direct Petition under RCW 35A.14.120, 130, 140,and 150. The proposed annexation area is located in the NE'/a of Section 3, Township 23 North and Range 5 East and the SE 1/4 of 5ection 34, Township 43 South, and Range 5 East. 2. Copies of the Renton City Council minutes for actions taken relative to the proposed annexation: A. E�chibit A: Certified minutes of the December 22, 2003 public meeting of the Renton City Council accepting the Merritt II 10% Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings petition and authorizing the circulation of a 50/50 Method Direct Petition to Annex. B. E�ibit B: Certified minutes of the May 3, 2004, public hearing of the Renton City Council accepting the 50/50 Method Direct Petition to Annex and declaring the City's intent to annex the area, subject to the actions of the Boundary Review Board. 3. Exhibit C: Certification of Sufficiency for the 50/50 Method Petition to Annex made by the King County Department of Assessments dated February 19, 2004 and King County Records, Elections and Licensing Services Division on March 26, 2004. 4. Exhibit D: Legal description of the proposed annexation boundaries. 5. Pursuant to RCW 43.21C.222, annexations are exempt from SEPA. 6. The following maps are enclosed: A. Exhibit E: King County Assessor's maps (two sets) displaying the proposed Merritt II Annexation boundary. B. Exhibit F: Vicinity maps displaying: 1) The proposed Merritt II Annexation boundary. 2) The City of Renton existing corporate limits relative to the proposed annexation area. 3) All major streets and other major physical features. Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County r Proposed Merritt II Annexation • 07/07/04 Page 2 4) The boundaries, including future service area boundaries, of all cities or special service districts having jurisdiction in or near the proposal. NOTE: The City and County library service area boundaries are coterminous with the City's corporate boundary. 5) King County Urban Growth Area and City of Renton Potential Annexation Area boundaries established under the Growth Management Act. C. Exhibit G: A map of the current City of Renton corporate limits upon which the proposed Menitt II Annexation boundaries have been delineated. D. Exhibit H: City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations. II. FACTORS THE BOARD MUST CONSIDER 1. Overview A. Population: The population of the proposed Annexation area is estimated to be about 43 persons at full buildout based upon 2.5 persons per household and a total of 17 households. The City of Renton estimated population as of April 1, 2004, was 55,360. B. Territorv: The proposed annexation area includes approximately 20.59 acres. C. Population DensitX: The proposed population density of the Merritt II Annexation area is estimated to be about 2.09 persons per gross acre. D. Assessed Valuation: The current assessed value of the properties proposed for annexation is approximately$1,981,300. 2. Land Use A. Existin�: Existing uses include 5 single-family homes with an estimated population of 13 persons. B. Proposed: The annexation is proposed to facilitate the development of the properties, where appropriate, for low-density single-family residential uses at up to one (1.0)unit per net acre. 3. Comprehensive Plans/Franchise(s) A. Conformance with Countv Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Kin Count� The proposed action is consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies in general, and the following policies in particular: LU-31 In collaboration with adjacent counties and cities and King Coacnty, and i�z consultation with residential groups in affected areas, each city shall designate a potential annexation area. Each potential annexation area shall be specific to each ciry.... . Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Proposed Merritt II Annexation 07/07/04 Page 3 LU-32 A city may annex territory only witlaiji its desigrtated potelatial arirzexatiori area. All cities shall phase ara�iexations to coincide tivith the abiliry for the city to coordinate the provision of a ficll range of urban services to areas to be annexecl. The City of Renton has designated a Potential Annexation Area in the City's Comprehensive Plan (Exhibit H). Renton has the ability to provide a full range of urban services to the area proposed for annexation. LD-33 Undeveloped lands adjacent to that city should be annexed at the time development is proposed to receive a full range of urban services. Sewer certificates have been issued for a parcel to the northeast of the annexation site and sewer and other urban services are available to serve this proposed annexation area. New development is likely to proceed upon annexation into the City of Renton and the availability of sewers. FW-13.Cities are the appropriate providers of local urba�i services to urbmi areas either directly or by contract. With the exception of water, Renton is prepared to provide a full array of local urban services to the western portion of the area with Water District No. 90 the designated purveyor of water for the eastern portion and the Coal Creek Utility District the designated purveyor for the smaller two northern parcels under agreement with King County, for this area. B. King_Count.y Comprehensive Plan/Ordinances 1) King County Planning under the Growth Management Act. The subject area is designated GreenbeltlUrban Separator in the King County Comprehensive Plan and is identified as falling within Renton's Potential Annexation Area on the Interim Potential Annexation Areas Map. King County planning efforts under the Growth Management Act have included ensuring that development in the Urban Growth Area occurs at urban densities and with urban level services available. This area was prezoned by the City of Renton in 1997 to reflect its Greenbelt/Urban Separator land use designation with R-1 zoning, allowing a maximum of one unit per net acre. 2) The following adopted King County Comprehensive Plan policies specifically support the proposed annexation: Chapter Two, Urban Land Use, Section II.B, Directing Growth to Cities and Urban Areas U-203 Kirag County should encourage most population arid ernployment growth to locate in the contiguous Urban Growth Area in western King County, especially in cities and their potential annexation areas. Annexation would allow development of the subject properties to occur within the City of Renton with urban services such as wastewater, police, libraries, local government, and parks. Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Proposed Merritt II Annexation • 07/07/04 Page 4 Chapter Two, Urban Land Use, Section II.C, Urban Growth Area Targets U-208 King County shall provide adequate land capacity for residential, commercial and industrial growth in the urban unincorporated area. This land capacity shall include both redevelopment opportunities as well as opportunities for development on vacant lands. Renton's R-1 zoning on the subject properties would result in considerably less capacity than that represented by the existing King County zoning, which is also zoned R-l. This is because Renton's R-1 zone is based upon net acreage and is a maximum, whereas the County's R-1 is based upon �acreage. An estimated 26 units could be provided under the County's R-1 zoning(without bonuses) and approximately 17 units could be provided under Renton's proposed R-1 zoning. Chapter Two, Urban Land Use, Section III.A, PlanninQ with Kin� County's Cities for Future Annexation U-301 King County should work with cities to focus countywide growth within their boundaries and should support annexations within the Urban Growth Area when consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan and Countywide Planning Policies. U-304 King County should support annexation proposals when: a. The proposal is consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan; b. The proposed area is wholly within the Urban Growth Area and within the city's designated Potential Annexation Area (for annexations); c. The city is planning for urban densities and eff cient land use patterns consistent with the Counrywide Planning Policies and King County land use plans; and, d. Adopted Countywide goals and policies for urban services, environmeratal and cultural resource protection will be supported. The proposal is generally consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map. The area proposed for annexation is wholly within the Urban Growth Area and within Renton's Potential Annexation Area.. The City's Comprehensive Plan policies and development regulations support countywide goals and policies for urban densities,urban services and environmental and cultural resource protection. The proposed R-1 zoning is suburban, small lot zoning, which, in this case will not achieve urban densities (4 du/net acre). This, however, reflects the sensitivity of the site and its role as a transition area between Renton and Newcastle where they abut May Creek and is consistent with adopted countywide goals and policies for urban separators. Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County � Proposed Merritt II Annexation 07/07/04 Page 5 3) Adopted Kin Count�p Plan desi nation: The adopted King County Comprehensive Plan land use designation for the proposed annexation area is GreenbeldUrban Separator. This designation is implemented with the R-1 Zone on the subject site. 4) Comparison of City and County re�ulations for sensitive areas, etc: With annexation, King County ordinances and regulations would be supplanted with those of the City of Renton. City of Renton ordinances and regulations applicable to the proposed action include the following: a. Regulations for the protection of sensitive areas: The City of Renton's Critical Areas Ordinance (RMC 4-3-050) describes pemutted and prohibited activities and uses, waivers, modifications and variances, and additional criteria and permit processes for development in critical areas. Critical areas regulated by the Ordinance include aquifer recharge areas, flood and geologic hazard areas, native habitat and wetlands. Although specific regulations vary, Chapter 21A.24, Environmentally Sensitive Areas, of the King County Code provides comparable regulatory protection of sensitive areas. The City of Renton Critical Areas Ordinance is available upon request. b. Regulations for the preservation of agricultural or other resource lands: Regulations preserving agricultural uses are not applicable to the subject area, as the proposed annexation area is not within any of the agricultural districts identified for first, second or third priority for the purchase of development rights. Further, the property is not designated for agricultural production or other resource lands in the King County Comprehensive Plan and is not currently under agricultural use. The City of Renton does not have a program authorizing transfer or purchase of development rights. c. Preservation of Landmarks or Landmark Districts: The City of Renton has no regulations comparable to Chapter 20.62, Protection and Preservation of Landmarks, Landmark Sites and Districts, in the King County Code. However, no landmark sites or districts are identified in the Newcastle Community Plan or are known to exist in the subject area. d. Surface Water Control: The City of Renton has adopted the 1990 Kin,e County Surface Water Design Manual, by reference, in the City's Drainage (Surface Water) Standards (RMC 4-6-030) as the design standard for surface water control in development projects. Higher standards such as those of the 1998 King County Surface Water Desigra Manual, Level 2 standard may be applied through environmental review. C. City of Renton Comprehensive Plan/Franchise 1) Cit�Plannin�Under the Growth Mana�ement Act Renton City Council adopted the current Comprehensive Plan in 1995, consistent with the requirements of the Growth Management Act. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map identifies Potential Annexation Areas, including the area currently proposed for annexation, and shows land use Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Proposed Merritt II Annexation • 07/07/04 Page 6 designations for such areas. (See Exhibit H, City of Renton Land Use Designations) The proposal is consistent with the Land Use Element policies of the Comprehensive Plan that support annexation of lands: • that are within Renton's Potential Annexation Area(LU-378); � where the availability of infrastructure and services allow for the development of urban densities (LU-379); • that are vacant and subject to development pressure(LU-380.c); • that are available for urbanization under county comprehensive planning, zoning, and subdivision regulations (LU-380.e); • for which the City of Renton should logically be the primary provider of urban infrastructure and services (LU-383); • that would include those who already use City services or who impact City infrastructure (LU-386); and • that includes environmentally sensitive areas and vacant land where future development could adversely influence the environmental and land use character of Renton(LU-392). 2) PAA status and PAA agreements with other cities, if any: The City of Renton has adopted Potential Annexation Areas. These areas are identified in Renton's Comprehensive Plan and on the King County Interim Potential Annexation Area Map. The City has negotiated a PAA boundary agreement with the City of Kent. No PAA agreement was necessary for the area currently proposed for annexation. 3) Required Comprehensive Plan amendments, if any: No amendment to Renton's Comprehensive Plan is necessary to process the proposed annexation. 4) Comprehensive Plan approval date: Renton's Comprehensive Plan was adopted on February 20, 1995, with annual amendments in subsequent years. 5) Required franchises to serve area: No franchise will be required for the City of Renton to provide services to the subject area. 6) Pre-annexation Zonin�greements: The subject area has been the subject of a pre-Annexation Zoning Agreement under RCW 35.A.14.330 - .340, which designates its zoning as R-1, one unit per net acre. 7) Proposed land use desi nation: The subject area is designated Residential Low Density in the City's Comprehensive Plan. R-1 zoning is proposed to supplant the existing King County R-1 zoning, consistent with the City's adopted Residential Low Density land use designation, upon annexation. Under Renton's annexation process, this zoning will be adopted concurrent with the adoption of the annexation ordinance. 4. Planning data , Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Proposed Menitt II Annexation 07/07/04 Page 7 A. Revenues/Expenditures This analysis identifies the General Fund revenues and costs associated with annexing the subject properties as they are currently developed, as well as estimating the annual fiscal impact of their full development at some undetermined point in the future. "Full development" does not equate to the absolute zoned capacity. Rather, it includes an assumption that a portion of the subject properties will not develop within the foreseeable future due to market forces and the choices of individual property owners. All assumptions regarding revenues and costs are based on existing standards or other comparable data, but actual results are likely to vary from these estimates. In general, costs associated with utilities have been assumed to be supported by the rates charged for those services. Assessed Valuations Units Population(est.) Assessed Valuation Existin conditions 5 13 $1,981,300 Full develo ment (est.) 17 43 $6,781,300 1) Estimated City Expenditures City Services Current Full Development Development Contracted services $137 $454 Road Maintenance $0 $2,644 Fire Protection $2,477 $8,477 Police Protection $3,510 $11,610 Parks Maintenance $194 $641 Court,Legal and Other $742 $2,454 Total ongoing costs $7,060 $26,280 2) Estimated Cit,y Revenues to be ag ined Current Full Revenue Source Development Development Regular Property Tax Levy $6,318 $21,624 State-Shared Revenues $388 $1,284 Miscellaneous Revenues $1,435 $4,810 Excess Lev $176 $601 Total revenues $g,317 $28,319 3) Estimated Net Fiscal Impact Net fiscal impact Existing $1,257 Full $2,038 Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Proposed Merritt II Annexation ' 07107/04 Page 8 3) Estimated County revenues lost: The estimated reduction in County revenues would be$8,317 at cunent development(road and library levies, excluding library bonds). 4) Estimated reduction in County expenditures: The estimated reduction in County expenditures is anticipated to be minimal, as only a minor amount of King County roadway exists in the proposed annexation area. 5) Estimated fire district revenue lost: The area proposed for annexation lies within Fire District No. 25. The City is already providing fire services under contract to Fire District No. 25. As consequence there is no estimated loss of revenue for this district. 6) Estimated fire district exnenditures reduced: The estimated savings to Fire District No. 25 because of this annexation is $2,477, the amount they are now paying the City for this service. B. Services 1) Water Service The proposed annexation is within three different water districts. These include District No. 90, Coal Creek Utility District, and Renton Water Utilities water service areas. The water service areas would not change as a result of the proposed annexation. a) DirecdContract: The northern two parcels will continue to be served by the Coal Creek Utility District and the eastern parcel will continue to be served by District No. 90 for the foreseeable future. Renton will continue to provide service to the two larger western parcels. Future development will have to notify appropriate district regarding water availability for their area and then obtain a "certificate of water availability"from the appropriate purveyor. b) Stora�e locations/Capacity: The zoned residential capacity under the existing King County R-1 zoning is greater than the capacity under the City's R-1 zoning. Since Renton calculates density based upon net acreage after streets and sensitive areas have been deleted and the County calculates density based upon gross acreage the various district's capacity should be adequate for the water demand generated by post-annexation development of the 20.59 acre annexation site. c) Mains to serve the area: Water District No. 90 will likely require developers to extend mains into the annexation area as part of their development proposals. Coal Creek Utility District currently serves the two smaller parcels abutting SE May Valley Road. d) Financin of ro osed service: This will be financed by developers and normal user fees for existing and new residents. . Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Proposed Merritt II Annexation 07/07/04 Page 9 2) Sanitary Sewer Service a) DirecUContract: Sewer service would be provided directly to the proposed annexation area by the City of Renton the designated provider for this area. b) Mains to serve area: None of the area is currently being served by the City of Renton. City sewer currently exists immediately to the east of the proposed annexation in the Stonegate Subdivision in Lyons Avenue NE. c) Disposal: Sewage disposal will be through METRO's wastewater treatment facilities. d) Capaci� Available: Renton's sanitary sewer system has sufficient capacity to accommodate full buildout of the proposed annexation area. e) Financin�proposed service: Improvements within this annexation area would be anticipated to be made through developer extensions since much of the annexation area is primarily under- developed at this time. Cluster development may also be considered to reduce the cost of sewer extensions in this area. 3) Fire Service a) Direct/Contract: The City of Renton cunently provides fire suppression services to the annexation area under contract with King County Fire District No. 25. Following annexation, the City of Renton would continue to provide prevention and suppression services to the subject area however under its direct jurisdiction. b) Nearest stations: The annexation area is located between fire station #12 in the City of Renton and fire station #25-1 in District No. 25. Fire Station #12 is located on NE 12`f' Street near Harrington Avenue NE. c) Response time: Response time to any point within the proposed annexation boundaries could range from five to eight minutes. Since Fire Station#25-1 and Fire Station#12 are approximately the same distance from the annexation area, the response time would presumably not change with annexation. d) StaffinQ: Station#12 is fully manned, with five firefighters on duty per shift. Station #25-1 is also fully manned and has three firefighters on duty per shift. e) Major equipment: Major equipment located at Station#12 includes two 1,500 gallon per minute pumpers and one aid car. Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Proposed Merritt II Annexation ' 07/07/04 Page 10 fl Certified EMT/D-Fib personnel: All shift personnel at Station #12 are certified EMT/D-Fib. g) Fire RatinQ: Renton's fire rating is three, as detemuned by the Washington State Survey and Rating Bureau. h) Source of dis an tch: Valley Communication 911 service is the source of emergency vehicle/aid dispatch. 5. General A) Annexation a�reements, for extensions of service: No applicable annexation agreements are in effect for the subject area. B) To�o�ranhy and natural boundaries: The subject area slopes down to the north towards May Creek, which flows across the northern tip of the annexation area. A stream protection buffer will have to be provided for any future development in the northern tip of the site. B) Projected 10-� rg owth: The area is too small to make reasonable inferences from large-area growth forecasts. The City projects about 12 new single-family units in addition to the existing five units on the site. This is based on existing citywide R-8 densities and assumptions regarding identified physical and regulatory constraints to development of the site. D) Municipal or community services: With annexation, the property owners and residents would have access to a full range of urban services including police, fire, parks, libraries, community services, the City's neighborhoods program, annual community events, and readily accessible local government. E) Potential delays in implementing service delivery: The area is currently underserved in regards to park facilities according to the City's adopted level of service standards. This shortfall is identified in the City's Parks, Trails and Open Space Plan update. Staff estimates a one-time cost in excess of parks/recreation mitigation fees of$11,927 as well as on-going maintenance costs of $641 for new park space to meet the needs of existing and future residents of this annexation. The current waste hauler would continue to provide solid waste removal for seven years following annexation pursuant to State law. The area would then be included in the contract with the City's waste hauler. With the exception of parks and solid waste removal, no delays are expected in implementing service delivery to the area. City departments reviewing the annexation proposal indicated that they would be able to adequately serve existing and future development. Water District No. 90 is expected to continue to provide water service to the eastern portion of the site and has indicated no major obstacles to service delivery at this time. F) Evaluation of adequacy, costs, or rates of service to area: Existing services to the area appear to be generally adequate. As development occurs in the proposed annexation area, demand for services will increase but not at a rate associated with higher density development. It is assumed that the cost of such services will be largely offset by increases in property taxes, services charges and other revenues based on population. If the City were to assume this annexation at current levels of j Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Proposed Menitt II Annexation 07/07/04 Page 11 development it would benefit by $1,257 per year, primarily because of the relatively high assessed value of the area and low cost of serving it at current densities. At full development, in an estimated 10 years, the City would realize a small surplus of approximately$2,038 per year in 2004 dollars. King County is the only alternative service provider for services that would be assumed by the City of Renton upon annexation. As noted above, fire suppression services will not change as a result of the proposed annexation since the City is already providing these services to Fire District No. 25 under contract. Also, school district boundaries are not affected by annexations. As a result the subject area will remain with the eastern and northern portions of it remaining in the Issaquah School District and western portion of it remaining in the Renton School District. III. OBJECTIVES The proposed Merritt II Annexation generally complies with all of the objectives of the Boundary Review Board. These include the following: 1) Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities. No detrimental impacts to existing neighborhoods or communities are anticipated to result from the proposed action. 2) Use of physical boundaries,including but not limited to bodies of water,highways and land contours. The proposed annexation follows the existing city limits on its north. The western boundary of the annexation is defined by 142°d Avenue SE, if extended. The cunent proposal's boundaries do not extent to SE May Valley Road, the nearest collector arterial to the north. 3) Creation and preservation of logical service areas. City staffs that have reviewed the proposed annexation have stated that the proposed boundaries represent logical extensions of City of Renton services. Also, the Countywide Planning Policies state that cities are the appropriate providers of local urban services to Urban Areas. The proposal would therefore further both the intent of the City annexation objectives and Countywide Planning Policies. 4) Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries. The boundaries do result in a somewhat irregular City boundary. This, however, is anticipated to be only interim as the City annexes out to the edge of its PAA in the future. 5) Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of incorporation of cities in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated urban areas. Not applicable. 6) Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts. Not applicable. Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Proposed Merritt II Annexation ' 07/07/04 Page 12 7) Adjustment of impractical boundaries. This annexation is not being undertaken to adjust impractical city boundaries. 8) Incorporation as cities or towns or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated areas,which are urban in character King County has designated this area for urban development. 9) Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long term productive agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the county legislative authority. Not applicable. No portions of the proposed annexation area are designated Rural or designated for long term productive agricultural or resource use in the King County Comprehensive Plan. finis .r`��q�.�/ :',� ��_. _•�,•'��L,l`;� _— �- �� •.•`�I.Y�� .�� ♦ � s. � �::�=�� '��,:4 ,. �iri•�� '��.�;.` �� j��. I�i•� u► � � � �� '��1�►\ � •'' �- '\��,��'�•►•�°d�� -- . ��, o�k�� - � � ��:...�� ►� j��1�� 1,�� 1�.�I��.►..�I . ...� . .� , �II�I ''`� •. �� .��` �I 1 � ��' 1 ��...�. ��i � � � �I�` . �� uun.� . •�� _.. , ��m�.� �� _� . �'��,,�� al�� ' �u�„��ll�il■��i� � � !��e�o■ ��R�a�, � • •^�� a�r-s��IWs�� , � � 1 I � �� aj��R��„,�O��w�� q ��— - ,�'�� A■.�IIIIii�'31a�s��y��uusvrr �� —�- ' .� � ■ r ei��u�r��i ur.�r .. . /�,+, I. �L7��Iii1iY�'��P N�ppO i [�1�� 11� � ' �,": .� ... . � ��e�n ��I �fi_ r ��n �'�!.��,��WjLCi[�� pr�Ol I�L•�Ge j��/�� -� o �� C�'��''��"-�3lIL•�'�iYi�i��.I ■�� :: � ��q IIh■.n■■■ ma�sr�:��v�e��n�� ■��mr��nnm .� .,��a'��.��r.:> ;.�' �� 11LLUJvu �� ►,�� i �� 1 .� ... �- �Ih��Y.YGJ��me� 0��i�i �► � �–:► .a��,�n� . • ♦ �,� �'i ,.. �.; • �� .��A".y= �i i a ii��I��I�Yu�7��I�� 1��►11�111�� iaR9 u�i�a!■'� ��• ��E��til�� a ''.�9A�u r.,�11L�IClEU�� maE�I!!��\\��► ��• ��r.�7��. �,��.'1-a��a� Yii�ac�� /IA�� p�� n m� w*��,�IIAlR�A� �� R ,�", �r s�-'��r II�. �� '-, ■•�,�utaue� ��ul1l�uu �AI�I �.t�¢�1:, ,��' �■__��W3�ai■��. �Y� 1111nr1�a►� � � ►�p��`M r ��I1G�7��RA�o��IID�� –i �Oi�i►�i i�I��'i�i�,� ; , �� . � �-r�'i 7 /. �1,::s ■�v��4��rir��u��+.��i!.. �JI�?�11 O� �O! �� — 1�m�:`Q■:.. �N � �..0 �G■�=��.•,•. • . ��r�.�r�� _ ... _ au��:n��es��s � �� ♦ 'L \ ' w■ �� t �v"��:�f�nr�n��0111►l�I ��►��i� �� .�.��r��+�� *�I� ��ib �!�� -..■.�,�� a�� .. .� ��w y, i �► � . ♦,r �� ii■.�e■�*��0��i�1�11�r r-��: t:�iiii�G��l�y��'�j ,. ■.�us�uu�� •�i��:, :�,■ • . ��--��,/ ' .�►�uyirn 4��. ��vi ` a:- , ♦ \ �1._, �:1111�;�nm�l�nu�■ ■r � i i� ii��i:ii��:��u �,' �� n�,�� '7 ; � � �r;;� w �/� �/ , ��I.,I' � �:!^_. �- ��■ :`I�'�A �� i': :� �� ' �.�Ir.. un � '�'�,►�'iiCllli+�1!�-r�,�� "� �`,��,� ' e �� u� +�� 1,�r , � ■��IIC�� . � � � '�cx� � _ , ;:�:,.'��!��1°� � ��lr�� !�■ ;;�.. �� . . ►.��/1'El��u , i.l �..... ,�. E�__::-.. �rr_.....1 • � ��u�I,y_�.,.. ;��l ■ ■� �CI�aC�I..�•.•. .1 .�. ��!a��"�''IA�� ::1w��eYlUI��\�� I � , ��',�j�� s�l�� ,r��""�r�W�tI1��I L'!��LYl�I1�I �i'i i�� I��. r.n��i0��► �jV �il� . ■E9�� IU�II�II��I�li3,.■i � �;� `�,` r�oaRlisl��a.I�� ■�� =.r� � II��J itt�EJj03�i1Elii��■ .,�',,�,�I�' e��i 7� ,�e.��\\ ��.e�1A�� r�t��■■L�'_._` 1\ �!►'� ua�d ie��r��uil�L'lLL�i11�� - r■■.Ip�I ��■��=��0 I11l�pl�llD�I�� —� - �_Ji��1:R�11/.��F`I/��/��J��Y�LLIIl7'U�� r� � �Y/YGiIYL'ilY�� —,I'I��."■ �,. � �� I�� i�ar��.��nn� ��1�!�w�� ■ n1 �� -- ---�� 1� . �� . ■ i1��rcn��wn�II C1��au��i1111■�� .�■ � � �� 1��/I , ��tl��I�� r ■i.►�•�. ■� C�w ..n.�.L �-1��' �1� ■■ ,�n��ntn�nnp� nnn��."l�lll�� mn ■��ILL�:�'■ �� ; �r��7su�:u��n�.�1� ��. �2► . � ��ii i a 11111� �• �■ n m��qr.;.� �r■■mt�llllll�� ' :��,� n� _��m� � � � � �w 'JFI�� —n� �N�� '� � ::�i i��A��W � —►�0� .�ca�� ■� _ •�-_iN 7'` in�1��p � ' �, — � � �r.nn��=1►�i°�,�_ :' �:: tiIV�.�� '� .��=.1� � ; n�_■.■•�ar,m r��a�ann`=� n��wp�— _�. �� - J � L..� id�n:... . .,�,_-..... �, . },� .,.��. A's�/ �1i��u��u��/.I/�U p o m D �c�a�ClIE�EI�■ M�� i�i i�.��=- II�11•��i C� ��P�' 4l�ll]J ��I�!`i �� _��1'� ��a .��,n��ns � ► �i QPi � �1�11�11 .�.. �—� �� \v��!!1�� I i 1�1111.`'".-�—�iYi� i Ci- ��• +��__ _. �G■ �III. �� A�Re�r.�IL7+�\��,�� 11�!`+ �—�� i�� ►� 1��-�� .e. �:1'l�IiY'"� � r-r—� � ■��■/ �� iill ��:� "'-�u:��7-1�%IIIID� t�-.,� ��::� �� IIIElf�1111��RI� �� \ IIIC93Y1111��C�9 ��II�a:�■�%III'��I�'� ■�� ...._l �� mnln tnnnim��u11�5dl� � - �1��_��Cu aiil' a��m ca■ IO�J��__nn o�� C�i�mc;r =�m►� `�� -��I��■�o �varu e� � '�7 ��11111��0� ■C�i` i-111=�� vl�71�C�y� �� =ni' nm �`��s�ra ' 3 - N: �� ,��fII�•I�� ::...i� ■ :nun e�� iiia� � �� c��u:�'a.�: ��nr � � �� -• P �fA�Gl,i:��'� __ �n■■r � = 7 I'��u � O _ � ��'�w�y V:" ' p � � �� _ �-' �///ll�l -I' �� - .. , ��na��iE:��p nrn.� . ��3�y� ��■ �� _� ��.rn�E:::l=T_'_'1f�71�_II�I��ii��«�'. � � � � � � � � � , � 1 11 111 ;:�::: � .� �:::::::.:;;.:;::;: '::.:.:: •:: r : 111 - • . . �- - ,. .. ..� : � � t� �. �� , � � � �� •. . • � �• �� M �__'_____ 102.48 -____ _ � � `` �� ♦ �_' 93.78 � 96. ^-'----�� x ��1�"'��_' "_", X �� X �"" �' '� � �-� 93.58 I �- 102,52 =_---_ ' � "--� X ` ��V� X 102.46 102.43 '_' " "_ - 95.6� x \�\ X �� x 101.B7 101.84 � 94.�2 '•�.,.� i� '�._.� x x � � �m.e� x I " \� 95.19 �_... ... x10184 I / ! \ �_',... . . i I � --�_.-.. ._..\ � / I \ 9a.aa � �- x `"-"" 95.59 ii �-. � X �..,.......___..... X �� " x 93.53 K 93]8 � 94.N � - . '___'/.� .." , .____ `�i.,.' _,--�. '___--� X x % �-�__. 94.60 93.52 93.85 9n.fi�� "-'' . ... .. .. 93.88 x 94.�1 X 54.4;. x 9a.65 x .. X x _��'�\ �h �f e� 93.90 � 93.88 � g6.43 . � � X \.\ _ ' " x 94.19 95. x S2 54 � � X X 91.75 95.53 91.97 L1 x 9t�.� 95.70 x 9 6`. --'� � � x 95.70 l3 X � x x 95.59\ 95.70 x _ � �_'"�� 1` i�'-�.. . 11 x95 x _� 1 ._i �'. _ ..,_ .48 1� ,... '_"__ i"� Xyfi 96.65 --- J6<6 �1 � X �� 96.79 x 96.62 -- X'•; � I I 4F.65 X � 95.65 X -� �" . �! 1 X 96.a� /� 95.77 �� "' /� 93.42 / � � �� " -- ��`�O-_� X � � � ��^ �1 x /f �`��`�� /� x9•.n. ��% � �� 96.63 "! � �••,� �� \ ��- / ___ � X \l -```� ` `_` 9l3B % ... .. � 96.52 9"/.31 95.61 �� X x �� 86.67 \�6�� '_'�"' `��`` �-`:�� 95.]G .. X �� ' � `_ ` � X � 95. �� ` _=""' '� � ` `� .50 i� 96.70 ```�`_'_'___"",� ____ `'_ ,� . " i, i� i/ `��\` X ��-_______•.___'__ �' ,_" ..i .57 � �� . _ . . -"""' � �� ,.. "_' -�-� ' � � _____ �_ i"� _'�� 97.{8 �. `. � � � _ . � .. �� . �. . � �� _. � . '_' ^ �_" ` ` � _ ' �` "'_ X �__, , \ 96' � � �� i_____ � • ��'�,'�,� � �� '____� _ �., ^ � x ' x97.l9 '_'_'� i� \�\� ` � �`�� `� ` ` � ` �_' _ M1l/ '`I\ �_ - 98.63\ ,' �_ . �� -.` � i � � � � -� � �� i i .. ��..='_"�_�� ._� 4J .- � __ �� _� �� ` � i� - �� -� �__'__"'�'�-�� ^ "_ '_� 70 � �� _ _ �. 99 � • / �� i � _ _ ^"\` \ ` x �\ x9& _'_'__ - _____ �-�'., �, � _ 98.50 9 ______"'.. '�--'%'- _ ____"' ' -�"�� _ �N6.B-"' X X _____'___��-�� __ ____-_-_ �� ` `` � �� 99. } _'_ _� x 7 -�______:" �'____ '__" " � � � � _ __'_ 98 2 '�',-��- � ' '�;.-__ -____ --�� 1i � 100.61 � x99.57 86.9 �''�'- I-� � ''� _____�"_� �.� `` ` �\� �`"'0 �:`\�\�\``�\� // i00.20 X �' _�` � � _ � i - � �� -' '_� �' _ -__'_�__' � '__ x �`. ♦ �� - � _-- �-� ' �-' -:. �� '_� _�-__ -__'_� �� --�_ �i � ��_ � __ _ ♦� �� '�-_____'� �;�;� ' � � � ��-�-.'___'�-_-_'__ �\�\�`�`\`\\`\�`� _"_, �_'__"� �"' 1 �\�;`�`� __"_' \\`♦ �♦ ��-�_' „'___ � � ♦��`� �♦ \� \�`�````\ �� X �� ♦�� ♦ � ♦ __'.. � � . � �� \..``,�`•` � / 10.1 �\v � e� � '' \ � ��`��\�\�` ��`� ``��`"``�\� �\��`` „ ,-_____' 100.�0 "' � �`�� `� ��\�\�� "" \ x .B{ ,__ l'�� \� � - ,�,- 1 x116.J0 1 ��\\\\�`��\\\�\\\`��`�\ `_" _ ` _ x1�2.58\� _____' 5 � � \ \�� \ \ �\ -- \ '0'..a I ♦\� \ �� \ \�\`� \ _____�- X /' ' � X �\`�\\��`�\� . ``` ` ` _` � __ \ "�� ` �, � ` ` ``_"�_,_ `' 736.20 125.86 ��`��\� ♦ � __ _ � � _ _ � _ ��' % ; ��`\�\\��. �`.' '.\, �` �\� __ x 127.26 � ��\��` � �� '�;�� '� ��;� `" �" .'i3 x t 125.33 � �11` \`�s� \�\�� --��;;. �� -'�'_ ` ' X - � ( X I```�1,� a.` `�`` �``�\� ��\\� ` __�_-�-� x 7 �\ ` ��`\\` ` `�`� `\ ```�`\`� � _;\\ ` ` `____ 104.63 \��\ 124.84 \\ ��\� ♦ � \�\ \ \ ' \\\\ �\ ` X '- 10 :SE'.., � '// ' 127.87 x �� ``J� `�\ `,� `�` ````�``\ `\ � \� ��- �\��`� `� \ 1' � / X 128.61 ! \1��_..�/�`� I 1� `� \\ ```\\ �� `\\ l\ ` '�\\��1�� --\ x 104.59 � � � � � � \ ♦ \\� � \ \ � \ 10 59 j - � `_ 1 � � ♦ \ \ � ♦ � - � 2.1 / ' ��` ' 1 I 1 �\ �� \ `` \ � ��' X � ��725.14 1 1 y � 1 \ \`�\ � � 105.82 "1 ! , � � � \,�� .` � \ 1 ``�� \ `�� X ♦ � � \ � '�� `' " � 1 � 1` �` \ �\ �� 1 I `I�i� �� / � �� i � 11 \ \ / / I / �, 105.48 ��- �.i �, � � ; i ' '_ "�`` � - _` �125.15{ 1 1� � 1 `� `� % Ir I � j 11X56 X � K,,0.4] �11\��\ ` .. � �._� ��_ '.. � �\ `\ 1 �1 ,\ `\ �\ 1 � 1 1 \\\ � \ 1� x 129.9` � �1 � � � � � ` � � � � � 1 � � 129.1 , _' - �1 �V �\ � ` ``�\ `\ `1 `\ '� ,� � 03. � - � \ \ \� \� \ \ ! � � __ -" -_,. '-' 1 9.65� x � � �, � � � ___ 105.68 \ 25.71 � -� � X x x '132. �1.1 1 \ \ X 13.19 � 129.60 � 12 51 1 __ ��y ,}.58 10P.B1 X 1` x _ �� •. X � � ��i _'� �� i 13.46 �1.]1 �� 18 �\\ � �\ �\ \ 1 � `\ _ I 04. / X \ \ 1 1 \ � _,. \� \ \ \ 1 1 1 \� 1` _ 1 �/ '\ \ \ t � � / � I}0.63 '29.61 \� ,,`� �1 \\�I I \\\ 11� `- `� 1�1 x.91 � �/ x x x128.57 x �1 �� 11 � I i �.'� !\�\ � 105.57 � 127.61 X � 1 � � � I � /108,59 � % �� i/ / L_ 121.32 � 1 � I / � I 1 1 I � l / � `�� 1 12.59 1 � j � � i/ j \ � � - / � 1 �� X � � j 1 I I � I \� �\ I I / J 1 .65 i / � l r�1\ �� \ I \\ � 1 I � 1 1 I 1 / � �I / �' I � 1 � �\ �\ � 7 1.08 t31.1 �\ � � \I I 1 � 1 `�\ �' -�� ` / 106.63 Y� i � �� ` �� \�� X x 128.N 122.58 \�\\ `�1� \ � � \ � �� X ♦ i ♦ .\\�\ � 1 x X ` 1 I,� , , 1 � � � % , i � � - �I ,� � � I 1 k �� . / \\\ `_ __ I I ' � 1\ { � i i .� �;1 � 4 ��.�� i 11 /� `.\ " � � �i �� This Eocument is a grophic ro�rosentoHon,not guoronteed t38.a 13�� 2X� ��`�� to wrvey accuracy, ntended for city urpoxa only and x � .,gg\ �-�� boaeO on the best i(ortnation owilobPe ae of the date s�own. , , Thia map is for display purpoaes only. Proposed Merritt Annexation o 200 400 Figure 2: Topography Map 1 : 2400 Gti�Y �,{, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning - 1 m InteN11 COufltOUf � � � Alex Pietsch,Administrator --- Renton City Limits G.Del Rosario �ANT�$ 3 November 2003 � Proposed Annexation Area i ' � i , ; ❑ o ! I � � � � �� : _ _ � � - � i � ❑ � , o � � � I I I � � , � �' � ❑ — � � � I , _ � � � �--__� - - - L-- o � �❑ i •� � o � . � o i, %� � � ; � � �� , i � ,i � �� -� � ' - , � � _ �� , ., � t � � —,— � -- ----- �O i, , � 1 i �I'� i � � � � ,� � � I � I f � � i�� [�I j � — _ �� This document is a yraphic ropresentation�not guarantaed to wrvey cc y tended for city pu a�oeee mly and baned on theuDest�intormotian awilable of Me date shown. I This map is for Ciaplay purposes only. Pro osed Merritt Annexation o 200 400 p Figure 3: Existing Structures Map 1 : 2400 � Gti�Y 0,{, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning � Existing Strueture ' � � � Alex Pietsch,Administrator --- RQ�1011 Clty�II711tS i G.Del Rosario �'�cNzo'$ 3 No�embeT zoo3 � Proposed Annexation Area �i ♦ � O v � I I � � I � � � �, ,, High I � ' � � I — ----__ _ ; ' i �I j ' , � � � 'i ' III � I --�---- O i , i' � I � This document is a yrophic re�resentation,not guarantaed to survey occuracy, tended for dty purpwes only ond based on the best information availoble as of the dote shown. This map is for display purpoaes only. Proposed Merritt Annexation ° 2°° 4°° IFigure 4: Sensitive Areas Map Flood Hazard 1 : 2400 Boundary Uti�Y o,{, Economic Development, Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning High EroSiOn * � � Alex Pietsch,Administrator Hazard Boundary --- Renton City Limits G.Del Rosario �l'NT�� 3 November 2003 � >40%Slope � Proposed Annexation Area � _ _._ _.�____ - ------ -- _ _______ __ _ _ . � - — - —� � _ ___ �. i � I t i �,' ^�I�� .. _—_.. <.'� �', . . .. . I I .. I � � �� . } �tw � � � .. . � � —__ __ p:�. . . . . —_. ._—_.._ --_—._--_L___—_._ �-... . .. � . � I � I � '��'` ! �' ' .�°^ I � � �`" � � i I ,Y, � � I �. � , � i � I / i , � �' j �; ,. � I --___ � I i ; � ' �� i � � ) � �' �� _ _ ��.r � � � � .�, � M . , � �� ` r. S �� 'p� . � - .. . .. � �a �� , ��, ��, . . � I � /� �" ' .. . , .. � A J �� I O � r � _,� T-- -�---� - , , _ � �_ _� � � � � � � � — ��- , � �� l � � �� E � � � . � € 4 ' [ � ` � � � �. . . .�. ._.�� p �_�M1 �� , � � � ;' � This document is a yraphic reCresentotion, not guoranteed _ to rvey ccuracy, i tended for c'ty purposes nly and � based on the best'nformation avalcble as of the date shown. � �� This map is for display purposes only. Proposed Merritt Annexation ° 2°° 4°° IFigure 5: Aerial Map 1 : 2400 Uti�Y o,,{, Economic Development, Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning � � � Alex Pietsch,Administrator --- Renton City Limits G.Del Rosario ��NTo'� 3 No�embe�2003 Proposed Annexation Boundary I � � �� a h � �� s w � > Q W � � � � � Wa y ��-� _4 ; ^�n S � � i , "�, � �� S � f - � � � � 1 � � � o ` - - y � � - — - - � -- - ; - - - - i_ _ ; � 1 � � > , � � � E - - � �R-1 � II i — - -; — - — j I �� .�l�St I� � � � i $.-- � I - iA�� /<��.. � — �:. _ � I '� ` 4k_, ' �I ' � - i N - i - � ,� - i - - - � - � ° �� e _ I _ � � 2 - + i 1 - _ _ � - �` i R � � � R t �� 104th St, �, m , e � � � � ��; � - � l � C — — _ — �� _ Q� - . �__"_ _L_ - _ . _ _ S. _S cf L ',_. I _—`_- Z �/ � — '� �} � 1 r _ -- � zi � ' I �� U I� ' U I " � �' This Aocument is a yroph(c reCreaentation,not guaronteed � � I W .—J V-- ta vey ocwracy, ntended for city urpoxa anly and �'�AA_ Q _ ��t � — baeedr on the beat'fortnotion awdobPe os af the date ahown. �v� �v � Thia mop is for display purposea only. Pro osed Merritt Annexation ° 80° 16°° p Figure 6: Existing Land Use Designation &Zoning Map 0 Residential Options 1 : 9600 O Residential Rural Gti�Y �„�, Economic Developmen[,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning � Residential Single Family ♦ � ♦ Alex Pietsch,Administrator � Center Neighborhood --- Renton City Limits G.Del Rosario ��NT�� 3 November 2003 � Pre-Zoned Area Proposed Annexation Boundary PLEASE DETACH BEFORE DEPOSITING CirY OF RE�ITON,WA 98055 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK N0.228537 070904 07/09/2004 Filing fee for Merritt II Annexation 0.00 50.00 RE�� ; JUL 14 2004 ECONOMI�DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOpp� AND Sr.Rq,.;�ViC F�q�r�l;pr � �Date � � REC IPT N° 56458 � � � �� +� Received From � � �G� -fi` 3:7 p�M Address � pW xJ� �C�� s� $ j � �� mount �� Cash T l �1 �V`� [�� Y� � � � ? � Check � � � L`-- V ��" Re(er nce O C o, Other BY: Q ,. Signat 50.00 , I � King County `" �� a � ,,��.�11 �� Records, Elections and � �icensing services �ivision qpR � 2�04 Election Section Department of Executive Services ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NE�CNBORHOODS, King County Administration Building 'N�NL.'�,�Ft �'_ c;n�p,`��;,�; 500 Fourth Avenue, Room 553 ""` Seattle, WA 98104-2337 206-296-1565 Fax 206-296-0108 T'fY Relay: 711 March 29, 2004 Don Erickson, Senior PlannerlStrategic Planning City of Renton lOSS S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Petition For Annexation—Merritt II Dear Mr. Erickson: King County Elections received a petition to annex a portion of the county into the City of Renton on February 13, 2004, and additional signatures on March 15th The legal reference governing this petition is RCW 35.13.420, which states that"The petitioner have signatures of the owners of a majority of the acreage for the proposed annexation area and signatures of a majority of registered voters residing in the annexation area." There are 11 active registered voters in this area. The number needed for sufficiency is six valid signatures. King County Elections has verified seven valid signatures. King County Elections has found this petition sufficient in the registered voter requirement. Sincerely, ° �� Bill Huennekens Superintendent of Elections ;;, ,; CITY OF R�NTON � Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Alex Pietsch,Administrator February 11, 2004 Mr. Jolu�► Sweetman, Accounting Division Manager King County Department of Assessments 500 Fourth Avenue, Room 709A Seattle,WA 98104-2384 SUBJECT: CERTIFICATION OF PETITION TO ANNEX -PROPOSED MERRITT II ANNEXATION Dear Mr. Sweetman: Enclosed, please find a petition form and accompanying documentation that together comprise one "50-50"Direct Petition to Annex. The request to annex to the City of Renton, a code city, is made under 35A.14.120 RCW. The Petition is transmitted to you for certification of sufficiency of the signed property owners under the applicable sections of the RCW 35A.14.420-.450. A list and map displaying the property identifieation number has been included to facilitate your review. If you have any questions or require additional materials, please do not hesitate to call me at(425)430-6581. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Sincerely, y . Donald K.Erickson,AICP Senior Planner Enc. u�Fn�.rcn�ne e�e t�e�s�Sam�le Pc�rms\Kf'A t�ru nnr R E N T O N 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 �This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer A H E A D O F T H E C U R V E . �� _ CITY OF R,ENTON � Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Mavor AIeX PletsCh,Administrator February 11, 2004 Mr. Dean C. Logan, Director-designee King County Records,Elections and Licensing Services Division 500 Fourth Avenue,M.S. ADM-IA-0553 Seattle,WA 98104 SUBJECT: CERTIFICATION OF PETITION TO ANNEX-PROPOSED MERRITT II ANNEXATION Dear Mr.Logan: Enclosed, please find a petition form and accompanying documentation that together comprise one "50-50"Direct Petition to Annex. The request to annex to the City of Renton, a code city, is made under 35A.14.120 RCW. The Petition is transmitted to you for certification of sufficiency of the signed registered voters under the applicable sections of the RCW 35A.14.420-.450. A list and map displaying the property identification number has been included to facilitate your review. If you have any questions or require additional materials, please do not hesitate to call me at(425)430-6581: Thank you in advance for your assistance. > t/ ` Donald K. Erickson,AICP Senior Planner Enc. 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N T O N AHEAD OF THE CURVE �This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer � I � ❑ � 3`�Z4-D5�i0?(o � �- —_ I � o � � � ° � [� 3¢2405�i4 I q � � � � � --�---- ° '�� -r c� • ° a i� ; o , � ' � , 032 3o5q0�� , �32 305�' !d8 C32�o� q2�'7 ■ •. � � 0 � � � � � I � �P � ' o �� J� �� Thh documml is a�apMc ep esentation.not quwanteed � to ay accuracy, tmdedr for e ty pu soxa only ond boeed the Ceat intormation owilable o/the date shorn. This map is for 0isploy purpoxa only. Proposed Merritt Annexation o 2oo 400 Figure 3: Existing Structures Map 1 : 2400 Uti�Y �,r Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning � ExiStitlg StfuCtufe � � � Alex Pietsch,Administrator --- Renton City Limits '`�� G.Del Rosano �'ANTo'� 3 No�embe�aoo3 � Proposed Annexation Area , , �. MERRITT II ANEXATION PROPERTY OWNERS LIST Property Property Owner Address Acreage Owned Identification � Number 032305 9108 Michael Merritt 14408 SE 100 Street 4.81 acres Renton,WA 98059 032305 9037 John P. Andrews 9606 143` Place SE 8.53 acres Renton,WA 98059 032305 9247 Robert E.Blayden 9933 143` Ave SE 6.17 acres Renton,WA 98059 342405 9019 Mark Madfai 9524 143` Place SE 0.45 acres Renton,WA 98059 342405 9076 Einer I. Hindeland 9530 143` Place SE 0.63 acres Renton,WA 98059 TOTAL 20.59 acres � � W J ( � �� d P1i10�.�.�' NOV 2 1 2003 � Annexation Review Form CITY OF RENTQ� UTILITY SYSTEMS (X) 10% Notice of intent ( ) 50%Annexation Petition TO . Building Surtace Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods &Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Proposed Merritt II Annexation Location . Subject parcels are located in the NE 1/4 of 03-23-05 in the vicinity of Summerwind/Stonegate. The area is bounded by Lyons Avenue NE on the east, SE 100"'Street, if extended, on the south, and approximately 142'�Avenue SE, if extended, on the west. Date Circulated: November 19, 2Q03 Comments Due: ��' � 3 , , General Information Area : Approximately 20.59 acres. Street length (public) : 200 linear feet(existing); 2,300 linear feet (est. for buildout) Assessed Value : $1,953,300(existing development) Estimated Population . 13 persons Current Uses Residential . 5 single family detached units Commercial : Industrial : Public : Comprehensive Plan : Residential Rural (prezoned R-1) Designation Future Uses: . Detached single-family residential units Future Po ulation : 48 ersons 19 housin units . Reviewing Department/Division: � � ��G� �n ;ncerin r' 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? �G a��hou�h� �,1Q�p,,� jt�v�c� �v -4�11.E ��°�,�atd an�cxa��n W�u �� I�-fv�icQ.�d h �-�h� C��( U.� �Z�n}uni C--�t„� � �UE� 'wl �w� �u•cel� � `� � ,� ��__— �.. dlhU� � W'U�(c,✓ ��i�'tiC� � Q� C . �� tZ �CISVC/�,,(It pc«c.eQ� , �i 1,� r�nrll�.e��i. rr��Y �lv� ��U�' � ��/�,,� I } 'A1 ti u11�Vh �-�1A�l..�cC� U�i1�� ()r st+,�v� CS� (r�1a� 6r �ct0� `�-j �w �t��i(� 1�ca �,p�r�or�� u.�a�t� �cnd�ly hu�rdc�J d 2. Are you aware of any probiems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service [��. _ t\!(��t��1��t�1 �Xita;�u�►�s u�,l,� �� RLi�u;;�Y/ tOt� �l;�'L'tUPT1i;aY i:r i��x��L'�i fh-�N��h�i��.� l��i�L� . - f�V�'uCh�� tnta Ai�U ;ic�ia�'1 ��tr� 1��5� �'tf_; i1:�2:�v��Lla i��c�t,�� t`�i1,Ar,�U�i'� (Over) �Ow DU Mt�s1L A' �i(1,G� PP�1�ftl m.i �il �% � � , , , { provision to the area? - 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? I�J, 4. Can you provide a rough dollar figure estimate of the cost to provide service to this area at current development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify any other costs, e.g, one-time capital costs, such as new parks, the City would incur as a result of this annexation? w��v �,�;u �,��;�:5 e�� N�� r��J��Qv��r.� s„�u �c- -��s��,�i� ,x �'ik��c) �t,N k�-t G)�i�lC��'�6�S� i�4��u cm-�� C�► c�1��L w��m ��v.��,� t,cri�:r�i Cc,N�rc��v�c� �i�, C�� n�i�,� Ca�i b�' t<.sik'C��✓ t1 Ps�N E�C^r.!�,cr�� . 5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the aftached map.) N IPC General recommendation and comments: r �qpu� ��s .-� * N�1'�\�1r 1 Ll�lY1'l�'�4 �Il`�Q.1��1 lV R.(G�S�INe C0.C��'�/ �5�.1��Y.��V � 5�-l..�llV�� Wl�,►�i 1�1�[� (J� ��ti�'i�/ ` ��i).1�-;t�1� - tS�UG sii �'L�S1''�t' - �LQn�'on. l_�.iA , � l�C�� A'�lt��lklSiusl a(J NJ��1 L��n� �9 cc'`. �1�� b:5�i��'/ _ ��U I _1`5G� '��,, �� _ �c��C,-L��.. ., 1e1� �1�.��`Sa�� r� Signature: �)LuL ��t'u''� Date: ��,� Z` � �''�� ,1Y(!� L1��1�('� �n�I�Q�c�Y�( S�(�1v��o�V` u , � � Do Q � � * 1 Glt � Y o �✓i�� ' w �r� u, �o � '�° � � �� ,� o � � ' a ��caH w �v S�p,v;� u1�aw oi • �� = 4Sou��'I sEaV�t� oua�4M► � � � � ;: • � � � � 0 C� o � ❑ � � � � � � \ / This dotument te a ryaphic represmtation,not guamtasd \ % to aurvey accuracr,intended Tor city purpoxa only and V boaed on the beet infortnation owWaEle ae o}Ne dab shown. Thh map is for dieplay purpwm anly. Proposed Merritt Annexation o Zoo 400 Figure 3: Existing Structures Map 1 : 2400 Gti�Y �„�, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning � Existing Structure * � � Alex Pietsch,Administrator --- Renton City Limits G.Del Rosario �'Z�Nzo'$ 3 November 2003 0 Proposed Annexation Area � � r'" , � ` , �-o3-Oo3 ' . ctn�oF REHroN ' �evis�c�> NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COl��IlV�NCE OCT 2 9 2003 ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS C�C ER�S OFFICE UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 . . �� ..:�:..,� .,.d.:, �,...2.:.�,�.fi�wr �rr�r� waNr wrr�ws�a� �: :+Mr ,� vw «�- (��,,�'t�� o� � �,,..,.�.�.;� ,;.. .�r�� y . (10%PETITION— I�El�`� A�NNE��ATIOI� TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF SUBMITTE�BY: ,�'1 i k.� /`Y)e r�:7'f THE CITY OF RENTON ADDRESs: 1�f S�v� �- roUr'� City Hall, c% City Clerk . ��►+�;-, t�s� 1055 South Grrady Way PHONB: i��s' '�7� '`�Y°� . Renton, WA 98055 � The undersigned are the owners of not less than ten percent (10%) in acreage, according to the assessed valuation for general taxatio�, of property, which they desire to annex to the City of Re�ton. ,; We hereby advise the City Council r the City of Renton that it is our desire to commence annexation proceedings under the pro�sions of RCW 35A.14.120 of all or any part of the area described below. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. A map (Exhibit 1) and legal description (Exhibit 2) are included as part of this petition. The City Council is requested to set a date not later than sixty days after the filing of this request for a public meeting with the undersigned. � l. At such meeting,the City Council will decide whether the City will accept,reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation; 2. The City Council will decide whether to require simultaneous adoption of a proposed zoning regulation, such a proposai having been prepared and fiied for the area to be annexed as provided for in RCW 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340; and, 3. The City Council will de�ide whether to require the assumption of e�sting city indebtedness by the area to be annexed. This page is the first of a group of pag s containing identical text material. It is intended by the - signers that such multiple pages of the Notice of Intention be presented and considered as one Notice of Intention. It may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of Intention. � Page 1 of 2 . � _ e � WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. <Y (Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the name that appears on record in the title to the real estate.) k3- ��- w I y4o8 sE iooT� sr � 1. �3 �3�3��9 �-�3 � M��we� Y►'1 �R't err•�- t�E�o N WAs 1� 9 BUSq 2. 10-1� �jlo�(Q 1�13fd i�1.S.t - 03 n ( n � H l�d fiGu�� en'�'o h� la3tk �3$t5��i (S 3�.'SC3 59073 �S►S cu. ' �J'S'Ztf f�f3 p� t�L S�F• 3. �es��-o.-.� �Q. �oS'9 3��t1�59 o I 9 0�y�.�"a�. ' �i^ �- f�?r,t� i 4. �L'"`y ,�,e.��' �; �33 I�f3 �� s� �'� �a�er�- E. 81a�en 1�P�n� �� 9�4Sy o��3o5'qa�r7 b. �7 i0-l� C�N�r�L, ��jNd,�C�ur) q53p �y3�� L. s� 5. �v.k�... �.vA cigaS� 3`12<<-Icxgo7 b c�. ta3 ,�R.=. 0 3 ��,�.�.. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. ..r� Zv.S��j�� Page 2 of� H:�DIVISION.S�P&TS\PLANNING�ANNEX\10%Notice of Intent.doc\OD r � x RECE�� Annexation Review Form NOV � � 20V� CITY OF�ENTOk� (X) 10°� Notice of Intent ( ) 50%Annexation Petiti�N-��'svsT�Ms TO . Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM . Economic Development, Neighborhoods &Strategic Planning SUBJECT : Proposed Merritt II Annexation Location . Subject parcels are located in the NE 1/4 of 03-23-05 in the vicinity of Summerwind/Stonegate. The area is bounded by Lyons Avenue NE on the east, SE 100'"Street, if extended, on the south, and approximately 142"d Avenue SE, if extended, on the west. Date Circulated: November 19, 2003 Comments Due: �� General information Area : Approximately 20.59 acres. Street length (public) : 200 linear feet (existing); 2,300 linear feet(est. for buildout) Assessed Value : $1,953,300(existing development) Estimated Population . 13 persons Current Uses Residential : 5 single family detached units Commercial . industrial : Public . Comprehensive Pian : Residential Rural (prezoned R-1) Designation Future Uses: : Detached single-family residential units Future Po ulation : 48 ersons 19 housin units . Reviewing Department/Division: /��' � l. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? �D 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service /`�c� (Over) * . � provision to the area? 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? �/�5� ,�� /'��,�� .�� .�� c:��/�u��.�� 4. Can you provide a rough dollar figure estimate of the cost to provide service to this area at current development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, such as new parks, the City would incur as a result of this annexation? � � � �,��mE�-� /`so �p G� C��ST, ��Ct,!/�2 �t'��`�`° sLt, � �y/ �/�l�" �j�l�%�f0l� 5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (I�f�� please indicate on the attached map.) � ��; 1.�d�i�� %�%� �� .� �w �,��. /� /�� U,r,��'i�t�/ `% /G'D� �" �� General recommendation and comments: �C��,E.di�ozl�� ✓ Signa re: Date: � 4 � � � ❑ O � � � a * ° � � � o0 Q � . � �� ♦ ° � � 0 � ,�� , � � �,.� � � . . . - .�� a \ y 5 � ... ; 3�' - Y 5 -''�: � �¢ � ,. _ - , _ _ , �. # � � - . . . . _ . ' _ _ .. . � � - . :Y . . � , -� ' �' ` ! � � . � '� ' ' " , �V - ._ - _ ..�':f`:'.,._ _�, _ _. ..- . . ' . � O �/ � � � �� --� � V Thb Oowment b ya ht��ded!ar cit ytoptwbnp�t�Q� bo�th�a Dart inlormotbn owiabl�m of Nsytlote ahown. Thb mop b for dopby puryoaes wdy. Proposed Merritt Annexation o 200 400 Figure 3: Existing Structures Map 1 : 2400 1 0,,�, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning � Existing StrUCture ;O� Alex Pietsch,Adminisuator --- Renton City Limits G.Del Rosario Z�Nzo 3 November 2003 0 Proposed Annexation Area � ♦ , �_p3_�lp3 " � CITY OF RENTON �e v�'scd> NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COl��IMENCE OCT 2 9 2003 ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS Cm•CL�ERK'5�FICE UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 (Direct Petition Method) (10%PETTTION— �YI E�� ANNEXAI'IOl� TO: THE CITY COiJNCIL OF s�tTBNIITTED BY: !�;!� /�'1��-r%7'f- . THE CITY OF RENT'ON ADDREss: 1�S�vg s� rcx�r� . � City Hall, c% City Clerk ��+�� 1055 South Grady Way PHONE: 4�s -�� -�Y°� Renton,WA 98055 � � The undersigned are the owners of not less than ten percent (10%) in acreage, according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, of property, which they desire to annex to the City of Renton. � We hereby advise the City Council of the City of Renton that it is our desire to commence annexation proceedings under the pmvisions of RCW 35A.14.120 of all or any part of th�.area described below. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. A map (F.achibit 1) and legal description (Exhibit 2) are included as pazt of this petition. The City Council is requested to set a date not later than sixty days after the filing of this request for a public meeting with the undersigned. � 1. At such meeting,the City Council will decide whether the City will accept,reject or geographically modify the proposed annezation; 2. The City Council will decide whether to require simultaneous adoption of a proposed zoning regulation, such a proposal having been prepared and filed for the area to be annexed as provided for in RCW 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340; and, 3. The City Council will decide whether to require the assumption of existing city indebtedness by the area to be annexed. This page is the first of a group of pages containing identical text material. It is intended by the signers that such multiple pages of the Notice of Intention be presented and considered as one Notice of Intention. It may be �led with other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of Intention. Page 1 of 2 f � t � . WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more thnn one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the name that appears on record in the title to the real estate.) k3_ 11c- w �y`408 S� tOOT.� S'C' � i. �"3 �3�3a�9 ��-� c M�ri�.w e.� m M err�-�`�- t�6�o N W�s�k a�5 q 2. i°-i� �`''� �t�� 13fd �i.S.t - 03 n P �nd�c�s (��n+o�, �u 9�0�5 a3�.3a59o� �5.534.�. ' �j5'2[f flf3�� t�L S�£• 3. ' �.'e�-�o n� �,q, yBoS�j 3�/Zyo59 0/9 ap�.�'�` " �r� �. �'lr,�� . ��,^d�_ �, q33 /�f3 A-v� SE 4. U� �a�er�- E. g l a�eY) 1�QiriT�'! �� 9�sC/ n�z3o�'qa�7 �� 7 �O'l� Ci�UG�L, ��1r�A�LA'N�) q53d t'-f3RJD �L. S� 5. o,� �-�..k,.-• t.vA ct BvS� 3'i�.�-I c?59 v Z b c�. (0 3 ��. ��. 6. 7. 8. 9. io. -T.�; Z�.S�t r��-�e Page 2 of 2 H:�DIVISION.S�P&TS\PLANNING\ANNEX�10%Notice of Intent.doc\OD Annexation Review Form [ X ] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 50% Annexation Petition TO : Building t��eE+�' Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Proposed Merritt II Annexation Location : Subject parcels are located in the NE 1/4 of 03-23-05 in the vicinity of Summerwind/Stonegate. The area is bounded by Lyons Avenue NE on the east, SE 100'h Street, if extended, on the south, and approximately 142"d Avenue SE, if extended, on the west. Date Circulated: November 19, 2003 Comments Due: November 26, 2003 General Information Area : Approximately 20.59 acres. Street length (public) : 200 linear feet (existing); 2,300 linear feet (est. for buildout) Assessed Value : $1,953,300 (existing development) Estimated Population : 13 persons Current Uses Residential : 5 single family detached units Commercial : Industrial : Public : Comprehensive Plan : Residential Rural (prezoned R-1) Designation Future Uses: : Detached single-family residential units Future Population : 48 persons (19 housing units). Reviewing Department/Division: 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? The southern portion of the proposed Merritt II Annexation is part of th� Green Creek sub- basin of the May Creek Basin. The whole annexation area drains to the May Valley portion of May Creek, where there are existing flooding, water quality and fish habitat problems. May Creek and associated floodplain is located along the northern 350 feet of the proposed annexation area. The downstream flooding problem would be increased due to new development of lands draining to the May Valley area, which cause increased peak rates of H:\File Sys\SWA-Surfaee Water Section Administration\SWA 26-Annexations\Merritt Annexation�lVIERRIT2- SD-REVU10%.DOC (Over) runoff and volumes. The City adopted May Creek Basin plan recommendation #17 requires "Full Mitigation" for any future increase in zoning density for areas draining to May Valley. � Infiltration of runoff, if possible, should be encouraged and compliance with the 1998 King fl County Surface Water Desi n Manual level 3 flow control standard is recommended if the IV�a ,��J ,�' zoning of the site is increas�from its present King County zoning of R-1 . A large portion of ��r� � �a+� L`{' � the proposed annexation contains steep slopes with high erosion potential. ��, '; �� 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service �� provision to the area? Public storm drain systems do not exists within the annexation area as far as we know. The public storm drain system in Lyons Ave NE could serve the area, if it has enough capacity. The King County Drainage Complaint maps and inventory show that there have been drainage complaints related to the property within the annexation area. The drainage problems appear to be related to sedimentation or erosion. 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? The proposed annexation does represent a logical extension of services provided by the Surface Water Utility. 4. Can you provide a rough dollar figure estimate of the cost to provide service to this area at current development and at build-out (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, such as new parks, the City would incur as a result of this annexation? There are currently no public storm drain facilities within the proposed annexation area. At full build-out it is estimated that 2700 linear feet of public storm systems would be installed in the 2300 linear feet of new public streets in the proposed annexation area. A total of 23 catch basin and 12 storm manholes would also be installed in the streets as public storm systems that will need to be maintained. The estimated cost for maintenance and operation of the public storm systems at time of full build out is shown below. Future Public Storm System Infrastructure M&O Cost: TYPE OF SIZES NUMBER UNIT COST TOTAL AVERAGE FACILITY (Maint. Only) COST ANNUAL (Once every COST 5-years) Pipe 12"- 18" 2,700 L.F. $031/L.F. $837 $167/yr Catch Basins Type 1 23 $10.45 Each $240 $48/yr Catch Basins Type 2 12 $4437/L.F. $532 $106/yr TOTAL: $1,609 $322/yr H:\File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 26-AnnexationsuVlerritt Annexation�MERRIT2- SD-REVU 10%.DOC No additional facilities or staff would be needed as a result of the proposed annexation. However, the accumulative effect of multiple annexations and the new development that occurs within these areas will eventually require the expansion of staff resource for maintenance and operation of the public storm systems. 5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (lf yes, please indicate on the attached map.) None recommended General recommendation and comments: Maintain the R-1 Zoning designation for the site to minimize the increases to the existing downstream flooding problems. Zoning density increases would require the need to provide a higher level of storm water control, when the area within the proposed Merritt II Annexation is developed; to comply with the City adopted May Creek Action Plan ,--------------------- --- ----__ _- --- recommendation #17. � � �� ,.. �� / ._ Signature: �� L€� n Date: ✓Z-�/��-' s � H:\File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 26-Annexations�Ivlerritt AnnexationuvlERRIT'2- SD-REVU10%.DOC ��/.�;�� g}��'- �((p j/�"`l�'�fy ��,�. f� ?'��P�.�-�_�l�t��1�l,r�n r i��a3 Z �� . . � � �$�� Annexation Review Form �,� ti�,�„�� .;.. : � 4�'��t�.; �. (X) 10% Notice of Intent �� "� ` ' � ( ) 50%Annexation Petition �' '�°' TO . Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM . Economic Development, Neighborhoods &Strategic Planning SUBJECT : Proposed Merritt II Annexation Location . Subject parcels are located in the NE 1/4 of 03-23-05 in the vicinity of Summerwind/Stonegate. The area is bounded by Lyons Avenue NE on the east, SE 100'"Street, if extended, on the south, and approximately 142`�Avenue SE, if extended, on the west. Date Circulated: November 19, 2�3 Comments Due: November 26. 2003 General Information Area : Approximately 20.59 acres. Street length (public) : 2� linear feet(existing); 2,300 linear feet(est. for buildout) Assessed Value : $1,953,300(existing development) Estimated Population . 13 persons Current Uses Residential : 5 singie family detached units Commercial : Industrial : Public . Comprehensive Plan : Residential Rural (prezoned R-1) Designation Future Uses: : Detached single-family residential units Future Po ulation : 48 ersons 19 housin units . Reviewing Department/Division: � �G' � Vi�� '�• ��f�°� 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? � 0 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service N/� (Over) provision to the area? 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? �� 4. Can you provide a rough dollar figure estimate of the cost to provide service to this area at current development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you Identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, such as new parks, the City would incur as a result of this annexation? NIP� 5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) � � General recommendation and comments: a'��►'�- �U��i � v a"" Signatur : Date: � . � r � `� � ti ;�� .� � � � � � . . �,.5 �,� Annexation Re-view Form I � � � (X) 10% Notice of Intent � ( ) 50%Annexation Petition ` �(�" , � TO . Building Surtace Water Utility Fire Water Utility �-� _ �J Parks Wastewater Utility ��<< �'j� Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods &Strategic Planning SUBJECT : Proposed MerritF II Annexation - Location . Subject parcels are located in the NE 1/4 of 03-23-05 in the vicinity of Summerwind/Stonegate. The area is bounded by Lyons Avenue NE on the east, SE 100"'Street, if extended, on the south, and approximately 142`�Avenue SE, if extended, on the west. Date Circulated: November 19, 2003 Comments Due: November 26, 2003 General information Area : Approximately 20.59 acres. Street length (public) ; 200 linear feet (existing); 2,300 linear feet (est, for buildout) Assessed Value : $1,953,300(existing development) Estimated Population : 13 persons Current Uses Residential : 5 single family detached units Commercial : Industrial : Public : Comprehensive Plan : Residential Rural (prezoned R-1) Designation Future Uses: . Detached single-family residential units Future Po ulation : 48 ersons 19 housin units . Reviewing Department/Division: <� �'Z` • ��t.. ��.�� c1Z-.-. 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? ✓� t� 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service (Over) � , provision to the area? � U 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? . �(1 4. Can you provide a rough dollar figure estimate of the cost to provide service to this area at current development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, such as new parks, the City would incur as a result of this annexation? �d � � �� (�J�'1/�-�— 5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) /U U General recommendation and comments: � / Sign�ture: �� _��t��c..rc��..��te. �� j �3 , . Annexation Review Forrn�' • .t� ' . . . , ♦ , • • �. , . • • - ' , 1' . . + ' (X) 10°�Notice of Intent ' � . O.50%/o An�exation Petition ' ' . -- , ' • A • , ` . . . ., � • . TO � •`r=' � , ' Building ' ��x�i�� Surtace Water.UtNity . '_ . .: � • � Fir�� . ,. . �NOV 2'4 ��ti�3 �� Wafie�U".tility � �� Parks Wastewater Utility Police 7ransportani�.�Systems uiv Transportation Public Works Main enance � Current Planning • � FROM . Economic Development, Neighborhoods &Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Proposed Merritt II Annexation Location . Subject parcels are located in the NE 1/4 of 03-23-05 in the vicinity of Summerwind/Stonegate. The area is bounded by � Lyons Avenue N� pn the east, SE 100"'Street, if eXtended, on • � � � � - � •� �the��south, an�! approxi�natety 142`�Aueriue SE, if.extended, on �� , . #he west. � � . �' . . , . �, �. _ . . , •. ,. • , : ' �. ' �_ . ; -,- , . � . . . . . .. � . . : Qat�Girculated: Noverr��r..19, �DQ3 Cori�ments'Due. .Nov��►ber.'26, 2003� . •� � .' �. General Inforr�ation � � � ' ' • ' � ` ' � � � �� t . . � . . • � . � . �. ; '. . . .,.. � �ret� . � -�� ' �; Approximately 20.59 aeFes. � . . . �� Street 4e�i�th (publiC) :� 200 linear feet(existing); 2,3� linear feet(Est. .. � � � � r • fOr,bUildOU�) � �� . . , . . . . , � • . Assessed Value . $1,953,300(existing development) Estimated Population . 13 persons Current Uses . � , Re�idential � . . 5 si�gle family deta�hed�units ' �� • Commercial : Industrial . Public . Compreh,�nslve Plan, : .Reside[�tial Rural (prezone�! R-1). � '. . , .• , Designatiot� � � . ' � . . . � . . '` . . Future Uses: �. � ,' ; � DetY�ched singl�=family resi`dential u�Ets. � • � , • � Future Po ulation : 48 ersons 19 housin units . . Reviewing Department/Division: �B pw�7�^aksAor-'�'a�ah 5Ys Ie•KS 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? /�f O. , . • � . 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existin�g,:»infr.pgtruc.t�C�aor service (Over) provision to the area? �eS. �bCcc 2�tPss (� l�i� �'he P iroPoSe� �tiGtG�a{jo�t S��' ¢S �1� �eXlS��T u,��rad��"�► �e �x�s�i� a�ss�s��-� s��ftP zk�iex��K S(� c7hd � s f�l�� P�cS►tc��L�tV'a�e S e�3 (,c1!'�t�K f�� a.G,t�rexa-�ivk �-il� uJould `e af�e e�p�hs� v-� ex�s-h'hvy prmp��c��k� a��- hcw dev�el�tite.,�: 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? y��s. 4. Can you provide a rough dollar figure estimate of the cost to provide service to this area at current development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, such as new parks, the City would incur as a result of this annexation? � uP9�'�[ `�C- e�(S�1� a�ccesS�,�'e�s S e�-v�K� �e pv�pos��-khex h �� a� n c� access ul �� ,� � a�r a� �ou�d 6e a f- �i,� e � �, ��th eJ� �t �f',�e exPense o� �cs°fi'ti9 pho�ve�t'Y o wpe,� a•�al�er�Kew c��veAo,o�tcH$. ��y� �s-I� asso<<af��! �cf�i hew �-{�e�f- l��I�fiK� as� y�laik�"c�cakc,e t.e�s �ss�<<a�c� cvlf� �.e�v �sPd�f��o,� �r�a,�y� a�d�av��.-f-�a.�-�� 'kz� rxa�r ,�Q � �<<,c�� 6 �ie Ct� a�,F--csr��e��'-�cvt�ep,r��,�-�a� b�cld��' sk�u�d n�f'de a --�iha�tcr2l �iu�lc� � �kc C�� , 5. Would aiternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (if yes, please indicate on the aitached map.) l�c hav�� v�d ��t�crns Y'e�a��r� -f�i� p►�opo� ,�outi��a��cs_ General recommendation and comments: rtG�P T,�ahspo�-i-afre� Sys�e�s Dtvtsroc� �asi�oHce�r�s �'e�av��n� w�c�-�r�r ��t�s pr�np�se� �H�t�af o�. does ��' LI OPS NO"�'� D�G.t.� 1'�. . , . Signature: L?d�" /�(Q%�� Date: �� Z��3 Rev�ew l�erd,�r � ` RE��/ED Annexation Review Form N 0 V 2 � 2003 (X) 10% Notice of Intent ( ) 50%Annexation Pe�fii�N�HBOR o0o E"�' f` -- AND STRATEGiC PLANNING i ..,.......t,. TO . Building Surtace Water Utility Fire f`'�`� 2 � �`'��'? Water Utility Parks � _ Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods &Strategic Planning ...�._. _ ._._...,._.. ._. :�._::_=._ SUBJECT . �.,,,� Proposed Merritt II Annexation ti. Location . Subject parcels are located in the NE 1/4 of 03 23-05 in the vicinity of Summerwind/Stonegate. The area is bounded by Lyons Avenue NE on the east, SE 100m Street, if extended, on the south, and approximately 142'�Avenue SE, if extended, on the west. Date Circulated: November 19 2003 Comments Due: November 26, 2003 General Information Area : Approximately 20.59 acres. Street length (public) : 200 linear feet (existing); 2,300 linear feet (est. for buildout) Assessed Value . 51,953,300(existing development) Estimated Population . 13 persons Current Uses Residential . 5 single family detached units Commercial . Industrial : Public : Comprehensive Plan : Residential Rural (prezoned R-1) Designation Future Uses: : Detached single-family residential units Future Po ulation : 48 ersons 19 housin un' Reviewing Department/Division: �� r��z� i � � 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? I � �� 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service ��i (Over) provision to the area?� v 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? (/ � 5 1` 4. Can you provide a rough dollar figure estimate of the cost to provide service to this area at current development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, such as new parks, the City would incur as a result of this annexation? � � � �.��t��►� 5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) �lJ� General recommendation and comments: � � r , rr/ Signature: � �� Date: �� .�'� � � � � � � � �o * a � � � � Q � � � �� ♦ ° � � a � � + 4� � �� _ � _ . , 1 � � � , � �, t ' � 4 � ,�� _ � �� ;,� �u � � �� _.� � � � � � � o �� — � Thb�,��o � .,�to��.�ot�s�,� to�y«a�«y,�e�a�a`�diY :.�Y�a bosad on tha Deat infortnotion owi�ot Ns data ahrnm. Thb map h for display purpossa only. Proposed Merritt Annexation o 200 400 Figure 3: Existing Structures Map 1 : 2400 ti� ,,�, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning � Existing StruCture + �O Alex Pietsch,Administrator � G.Del Rosario --- Renton City Limits �°NT 3 November 2003 O Proposed Annexation Area , �-03-003 ' CtTY OF RENTON �e vi's�c�> NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE OCT 2 9 2003 ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS C�CIERK'S�FICE UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 (Direct Petition Method) (10%PETTTION— i�Y�E�' � ANNE��ATION) TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF SUBMITTED BY: ,�i k� I`YI e r,t%7`f�' � � THE CITY OF RENTON ADDREss: 1�f�v� � toc��r'� . City Hall, c% City Clerk ��y�� w'��h- 1055 South Grady Way PHONE: i��s��r� -`�Y°� Renton, WA 98055 � The undersigned are the owners of not less than ten percent (10°10) in acreage, according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, of property, which they desire to annex to the City of Renton. We hereby advise the City Council of the City of Renton that it is our desire to commence annexation proceedings under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 of all or any part of the atea described below. � The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. A map (Exhibit 1) and legal description (Eachibit 2) are included as part of this petition. The City Council is requested to set a date not later than sixty days after the filing of this request for a public meeting with the undersigned. � 1. At such meeting,the City Council will deci�e whether the City will accept,reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation; 2. The City Council will decide whether to require sunultaneous adopdon of a proposed zoning regulation, such a proposai having been prepared and filed for the area to be annexed as provided for in RCW 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340; and, 3. The City Council will decide whether to require the assumption of eacisting city indebtedness by the area to be annexed. This page is the first of a group of pages containing identical text material. It is intended by the signers that such multiple pages of the Notice of Intention be presented and considered as one Notice of Intention. It may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of Intention. Page 1 of 2 WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. {Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the name that appears on record in the title to the real estate.) �-I�o- --- `^' �y�08 SE t00T� ST' 1. �3 �3�3a�q <�s-� � M��►ae.� Y�'1 �R1 err•-� �E►sro N Wi�s 1{ `►$QS�j 2. f�-�f� �(o�S(Q i'�3f� ►`�T,S.t - p3 n ( n � H l�ci�ct.J� �en�'o v►� I.�u �$t3��i (5 3;�''�d S90?3 �S.S 4.c ' �J'S2t� f�f3Y� t�L S�F- 3. '%yY�Z%� �eri-�o•-• w4, yBos`rj 3�240�9 019 a��'�c� � F � " ,��" �- �r{ i ��►�`�_ ,�.� �, q 33 /�f3 �4-Y� sE 4. �� D32305�9a4 fZa be r�- E. 81 a y�e►� 1�QirL`{�'► �!'� 98"US� 7 jo. �7 �0'l� �iN��'L, ►�t►-�r��L/}Nd qS3d t�-f'3�� t�L. SF_ 5: o� �-�.k,.,. t,vA ci gv�� 3`iZ'-I c�59�� b c�. �3 �R��. ��. 6. 7. 8. 9. lo. � �T..�; Zv.��fi r=�i'� Page 2 of 2 H:\DIVISION.S�P&TS\PLANNING\ANNEX\10%Notice of Intent.doc\OD 1.`�Y O U � � ♦ ••;� ♦ rr� � ��N�o� ANNEXATION SUBMITTAL MATERIALS 10% Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Included in Proponents are encouraged to meet with City staff prior to submitting a 10% submittal Petition to Commence AnnexatiQn Proceedings. materials 1. Legal Description of proposed annexation site if available or legal descriptions for all of the properties included. (City will provide legal �es description for annexation area prior to the first public meeting.) ❑No 2. A map of the proposed annexation site of a size that will allow it to fit on an D�yes 8 'h: by 11" sheet of paper. This map should identify all surrounding streets and clearly show where the annexation site abuts the City of Renton ❑No boundary. 3. A list of all properties in the proposed annexation area identified by street t,-[�Yes address or County Assessor's ten digit Property Identi�cation Number(PID). ❑ No 4. A list of all known residents residing in the area and their addresses as well �es as any businesses. ❑ No 5. The total estimated acreage of the proposed annexation area. ��es -� �� , 5`t ❑No 6. The proposed annexation area's current County Comprehensive Plan land � yes use and zoning designations. '/J7 � ` � ❑No L��,�:C__ 7. The name and status of any known current major land use applications or � yes decisions affecting the property. ❑No 8. The name of the designated sewer service provider for the area. � yes "�� ❑No -t��,�-1�.,.� 9. The name of the designated water service provider for the area. � yes UL;��1�r � � f Y i� � `i�� ❑No 10. The name of the designated fire service provid�e�r(fire district)for the area. � yes !�• ❑No �Jw�r� ` 1 L' 11. The name of the school district or districts the proposed annexation area is � yes located in. � ❑No !- >i�, � �.<,�t ��-1�:-� MERRITT II ANNEXATION ASSESSED VALUE & ACREAGE PID Owner Address Size Assessed Value 0323059108 Michael M. Merritt 14408 SE 100` St. 4.81 ac. $590,000 Renton, WA 98059 0323059073 John P. Andrews 9606 143r Place SE 8.53 ac. $563,300 Renton, WA 98059 0323059247 Robert E. Blayden 9933 143re Avenue SE 6.17 ac. $435,000 Renton, WA 98059 3424059019 Mark C. Madfai 9524 143r Place SE 0.45 ac. $208,000 Renton, WA 98059 3424059076 Einer I. Hindeland 9530 143r Place SE 0.63 ac. $157,000 Renton, WA 98059 TOTALS 20.59 $1,953,300 acres