HomeMy WebLinkAboutCED Planning File �,.z V j i«.,..e.°�c� _.,�..,.i
����; � -
:_��C - � - -
.,..�„--' L�m
L ,.`�" = ---- :�
"l ��/,\, i 1_ �
Yi��w� � J �
�,y
L__.i
�"" L v�r . �
n:.Ya"� t �
_._.__ j_' _ �
�JI r 1 i ��
i � r1'.,
r-- . ,`.,�
0323059078
03 3 591� � / ` �
�
23 5914 '� '°�L ;"�'Z
� �t �,:�,.
Priva o32 1 `�` %���
o� . ;-
� ¢323059119 `
59056 —�(��
30 � �
0323059054
� _�
03 59229 _ ��� � _
0323
5922 � ��� �
032
■ _ � � `
0 146 �Q/ /i�OZ 059161 323059155
5'�� 03�5917 �
��/� �'�2/a
1023059367 � �
�
r
1023059002 ��
a„o. � j�02305
I ti."
, ►
� � � � � ---
fl b� 1023059144
� � � ; ,�.
�
; ��I b d ,.,�.�,
s� � W 1023059399
� � i z �� � �8 .� .�
�� � ;
t— �--- r—'
�' � ,_—� � > ;- �."
� ; � Q - �
;� � � � � �
� ; ; .,�.
� • � TMa a«�„�i b ogr M� V �,�o��.�t q�o�,��.a
�o wrv.Y om.o�y.In°°c«,aw"/v"oxr auy o�a
� ! _— baasd on lhe best fnformotion a os of lAs data sho.�.
j lAis mop b iw duplay puryoaa only.
Querin II Expanded Annexation � 200 4°°
Figure 3: Existing Structure Map 1 : 2400
ti�Y o Economic Develo ment,Nei borhoods&Strate ic Plannin ���
P � B g ti Existing Structure ���
♦ � '� ♦ Alex Pietsch,nam�n�s�ro� - - Renton City Limits
�ANTo'$ 19 Jnuly 2007� e Proposed Annexation re � 2
�� 7
o. . �. .. /l1i4�0��
� • �
-� Washington State Boundary Review Board
For King County
Yesler Bitildirig, Room 402, 400 Yesler Way, Se�ttle, WA 98104
Phone: (206) 296-6800 • Fax: (206)296-6803 • http://www.metrokc.gov/nnnexntions
June 9, 2006
City of Renton
Attn: Don Erickson. ACIP
Senior Planner
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
RE: CLOSING LETTER FOR RESOLUTION AND HEARING DECISION
File No. 2222 - City of Renton - Querin Annexation
Dear Mr. Erickson:
We are writing to advise you that the Washington State Boundary Review Board for King
County has now completed the Resolution and Hearing Decision, as specified in RCW 36.93, to
approve the above referenced proposed action filed with the Board effective December 27, 2005:
The Resolution and Hearing Decision for this action is enclosed for filing as prescribed by RCW
36.93.160(4). An appeal period to Superior Court has been established, as mandated by RCW
36.93.160. The appeal period to Superior Court will close on Jul,�9, 2006.
In order to finalize the proposed action, the applicant must address the following requirements,
where applicable:
1. Compliance with the statutory requirements and procedures specified in the Notice of
Intention;
2. Sewer and Water district actions and some other actions are also subject to approval by
the Metropolitan King County Council. If the Council makes changes to the proposal, the
Board may then be required to hold a public hearing.
3. Filing with King County of franchise application(s), as required, accompanied by a copy
of this letter.
4. Filing with King County of permit application(s), as required, accompanied by a copy of
this letter.
. , �_
Page two continued, June 9, 2006
Form HE 8
5. Notification to King County Office of Regional Policy and Planning, in writing, of your
intended effective date of this action. This notification should be provided as early as
possible. Please send this information to Elissa Benson, Office of Management and Budget,
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3200, Seattle, Washington 98104, and
6. Filing with King County Council of: (1) one certified copy of your final resolution or
ordinance accomplishing this action; and (2) a copy of this letter. This document should be
filed with the Clerk of the Council (Attn: Ms Anne Noris), King County Courthouse, Room
1025, Seattle, Washington 98104
If you have questions or would like additional information, please contact our office at
206.296.6800.
Sincerely,
Lenora Blauman
Executive Secretary
Attachment: Resolution and Hearing Decision
Cc: King County Councilmember Reagan Dunn
Ms. Anne Noris, Clerk of Council
Ms. Debra Clark, King County Department of Assessments
Ms. Lydia Reynolds-Jones, Manager, Project Support Services
Mr. Dave Wilson, Records and Elections Division
Mr. Paul Reitenbach, Department of Development & Environmental Services
Mr. Elissa Benson, Office of Management and Budget
Mr. Dave Monthie, Department of Natural Resources
King County E-911 Program
District(s): King County Fire Protection District No. 25
King County Water District No. 90
Renton School District No. 403
94Q� `�G ��'W
�u���aH �ilqnd
p.�eo� nnaina� �(a�puno�
��������������� ������
��:�
:, .
� �
� ��.
�
_ ,���.��
�,�_ �� �` .�.., �
..�:�':��;_.
,�,a�" .. .'.. .
� ��� ��_
��a.>e..�:��. F;��
i�
�.�a� ..�...x ... . .,.
�4 _
�
,�,, .., ,,,; �°�- �:..
City of Renton �, e t-.�n, Me�rftt I!(Phds@ 11)
CUtt2lft Mti8X�i0ti5 .£.s t' . . `Perkir�'` 52.7ac.
- •v.rw. ��.,�q�. :5� �� �56�i. A
............�..�r,... .k.�`M.'� .`'«. '% �F� ;:
1wM�r�.vns� �'���s$i �;v..d
m�w
��=�- .� ,«�.�...., e:�' Querin ��.-w .� � `
.`�: ��` "� ; � 72 ac, . " �` ";��E
..Lf�,p'r q�: y .`„;E P�c ..�zb �tt, g�
«µ'�'d !¢:�':."cj.°"..Q. ����..� �}`i.� . �.��r�/�ulA�
���'. y�•�� >°'�'' ( •. �«'^`... '�� Y.„ r<V�'Q�. t�f .
�" 'R `:t. t �.� . T1L.. .. "
21''rbn ° .�q r''x k ii."::�r .-�jsE.��"� • . .._., , t
�; :�� �'.���..�°"' 4 Patk Tesrace. .»��`;� � ..
t�.a ;�;&�` -�� �°�. 79.78C. ��-�.� �p { ± MBptewbodi
.s,:: �;. .� _' � '� � 'Elementary«
�t4 � , • • '�t. :,y��-.� � : - � "�=� :.��:".
� _ "f �� i�l.lhdbeig. � r. ��'.« 9.8 aC.
o�-' '�,.'
;.rm�." 'i�,.yz�'::c. tO.BaC. , .;.�� ��i �+°\
:3$$, � . ' � �Mpg1dP� : T� � , �j 1 �'
e� �.' ��"_. �y p�•:���`,�•�.. "Y�, ... � z�.,,
� � 3. . ,�a:g,.'e. � .g'` "�.,, F. .... ... ,.. F,- .
r. . • Mtls�ief 11 . �°�.:�` : ..'? '
r ' .". - , fi6.5 ec. "'ti Leitch"�""`=��"-`°-
";-, :. ,� ���_� , .,. 1$.2ac.
�`,4r„� ��.„;,�,ae � p#�.' g�`�� • ,,�„�. .
� � , ��' , . ."�� .,§ ' `�Maptewood ,.
t , � , :��r�.<, , .;.. `=..z AddHian ',�.;�: �,
t�ravv� R � ...�,,,� ''��^�.�. t i 60.5ac �e`�' {� f---,
.l.rm..,s,... .. g�'."e _ ���.�Ak�sFarrns' ,:,���':.�.":� :�, ;
�' _ } Hudson=�; 13.9ae. , '. �` : "t .
? ! 14.6eC..; .. ;�r' : `;.�.'.:s'.._�.; 'g
..J .� • a�� ,f t� ,�� � t
> r
.: .� . �+:._, '
. • ,... . � s8$C�� r 4
� � ' t� � . �' , .' � :'" i � '�1..�
I ay., t..^ F ,.-..
, l.i'�3Y t , .,,�.ti:t.. .. ,: ';4.#I��,i-, €, �' \ �gxa, ,
• ' L.'�. �#�.An�1p11@�� '� '' F�..) f °t ,� �+� p
,tt�"�. ����,"~'� ?Jp7$C. '�«r,.�'. ��.- 4a� '
j- F.
a � i �` � •� . 4 � r � l �
� � a � •• . j �
r � I I � • �. w� f '�s �
�
�
t � '� � i • �
�. r 'r !• i � i
• • • i
i . ' • � "` . i
! . . �
i! • � i • '
2
tI)
�' ��aCi " 1�.�!!� i.�i c�� � �� � �\f iii i:.'�
. � �� �q/� =���7�ci k�'�'� � �r�� �F�I��.'►it�a:v��
� � � �� 71 w�r7�� � ✓f� '�C,=n:a u�,
� � �.�.� �%i■ �"� �i F � � �tlJ�t��ii�"-i1
� � � + I� � ���I I�I r,.Y iy
� Q � "r'—� ��1�11/�����0" �� ��1� �I��y� �
C CD . �,..`� �.��� fi.�rf�
� @ CD '� '�n. , t ii:altt7r,-R�! � �r.-�ia�f �lff�r4r,'Ix}�
+r..,
� — X• �1� ii�'- f��'i:;� ���,��i� ������t►nnru
■. � .. .. .��
� (� `��nq � � G����";C�f;:�a
= 4"`�A` l07 �. � � � ������rf:�r �r�w
� � � ���,a ,�„ ._�'����IJ�� � -�r, :��.1...•,.�s
'a � '-� �:'r�r�a � E3uJ'�;��� * !ny.�■r1�.�!
� •,� ��:,,,,,,,�. , �i���c-:��.,��
n,.��/f�l1� � ��� �——�
■ ■� �r � ����L��il�i�����' - ���.ra,�.=:
. �,.�ju�ui7
. ,�/ �l�l [r�i/�j *�i�:�a�iuts--,�- ■
� � �� , � �;��.!!1/il�/���� ���r��n��r'��N,���
� r �= ■-_�� i 1 � 1i.,�i�•'+••:l!
I ���� ���i �r � G����■■ �_=r■i� _ � � jF�C11:G��arf� ��s� .
� � a . .�l�►:`ttl
� �r''�i' i�,, ��' ' � �. �■ ' � �,1� _ ���i ���� .�',+��;fi��'�1�=
�� . - - ,�-aR ol: ai „ia�t���►�t� �:
� , '���� �111m == ��lll��t► �s�Ri,� ��':
� � iu�lir���� �,a r�se.is �� ��� a�
� �� � � ..i �/J•f;t12a.R�� Jli III
��� ti, ! � � � / ' ,� ��
,��i �!`� � �� � � ����� � =~'� ,���
�_ � w..,a.e. �',' ► �"i
I�= � ��'• Cy!:!i c; ar
� �i ���f�►t e�� �I�1
�-� t� '� 41�ii!
� �� ■�i�'�li��i�� � � ,,■�i[il��
♦ � •1�7G1 ,�M���
� """� � , r����l� !�� �i��ti■ `1 1�
1■r� ! � �'� ��==� :�=�5;r' ���►��i�������1
,�.�- .I ����+���rw;�■... ' r�
�� � '� � r ' �=�' iill�'��r
� ��- -- r��
,� - � :� ���:: ��
� ■ � � a+�.�!� fN� *�'�� �
r � � � •u�[:� 7E:a �.�ri�
� '' � . � ��--�i� =� �
. -��e r.,.� • ', � ' ������I �•�►�
� � a! �111�1�'���� .���
.�i
� � ��� �. �r'r l ,�■ �1��
�_� .
�����I�� ��}C��I�I��I� "' �C��'J'��t������
�� �-p,
� .
�
�
Up to 30°lo slopes � � _1 ,, , I ,. , � � „� . � �' �
an eastern half of � V�
site
�
� �' �� � ��t1
. ��„���e�
Topograpny Map ,� ����� •�
�' ����� �. -
�.����.��� C���"���,���� � ����SC�C��� ��������
_ __.. ��
Class 2 , � : �
Wetland �
r- -•, 4- , ��'
�i1� .
Honey Creek and • • ��
its ravine impact ��
eastern 1/3 of site � '
� `�
..
� �� ��'��
- �� �""' SI
� �. ��'
Sensitive Areas Map � �� �
�E� 1111 11111� ,��r
� ������■�� ��
�����uz�o� �utn�;.� ���.��,��c��H sp.��h���� �s��t��xr�t�r�t«�oc�l ��1a1�
'�'��.:»�" „�:� ���,,«�,r`
,� � _: x �
� j �d ,
R �
_ »
3� � �:
. __ . u,... " .Y;.� -�. . �. e- '. . ;
�3_' . ,,.,..... .. '�-+y�... �.
k� �
� � � . .. . . p � �.
F
� £ � � � 4 �
� � �
� � t �
f f
y �� � �!
� �.�:�µ '
� # ��
.; �
f4 1�v
r�
+i
� �.�"�M� .. � `�: i �a� � � .�� � '�n-�����'�S7^. � ���� .
- ., g`i, x .< 4^1.1'= iu `, �� i�, o ,�� ,
A
p`.r � •.'. ��1'l��� ; , v7�, � '7 t.�.�et�a�t �r � . _{
� e5 a�r � �� ^W . '� �� �t,�� � _-S
'`� , ;�� �e �.
�'*+�� ,�'!w��� t��`� ' .'XT �� ! x�,.
•a����L.. �'" �"`�.. . �s � �'e k s.�a;
�'�. �"�:d. �,�. �+., t' �r w�� ��J �. F
,��+ �``,�[�4���." +;;` -�� � ':
�,�"
�, � �`� �..�� �
_,� .���� �t ,
e• • ���r.+.�a.�ar.,.a.»��" ..x�� *:��..'�«.,..� }�� .'���� t A"A�
�a��unoc��.T.�atl�n�s s�z uro.i� a�is � uu�.z� t��oi�r,tnyc���l :ti�a�A
�i � -� �.,
� �� � �` �� '��� '� K��°' �� . ��
z... � � �
.?s`�'�,m a.�`t'a�-a �.<t � � � s���.� "„ � t i
�!.,�� � �R : R p � , �
'K ��L'"aV.ry��4f"`3 +F :, �i : �`"�is ��:
�' � m�!"� � �. ^'�' 3.
��'�"� �`.'.,.,,A„�-`�T�; a,'ew��� ��T.,�i:Y �+€ "..
/ � � t `; � r��°'t �'„"P' ^s .„+ �t'� �`� �
�-� a
�����,sts , �"'�i.`�'"`',•,,.�»� ��.���J� 'r"�'I-t�i't� '�'. .
�.�., '� �:v�y,�"� ��fi+� �....�^}'�'x'���,�4`�"�"��"`��.%f� � �'
`- .'�...., ��'�' y.�r r *' � ..� -r,s� -,�` �..w'�� �.` �,r "�
*, � 4 �� ���� � �fi��,�,...���,� � K �
3 �,�> � � "'��,'&� �•��� r*` a�„„.-cr r„x, ""`,
;+� � . �{, �,�, . J`��ir -i �3. � -. �
s� ;� ' V � ,k �f�. � .�-`�� �, (��t
��
E � �� ������
� �-�,.�.� 3w.�.say �f +!� '`� �� v R k =#� ��
MF'"is�:��"'� ,� \ � ��" t � �1 �. f g. Y,� :
.� g ��� � � ..-s t � <t
�� _��A � � ' �� t � � � �
� i�3��# S *�"^*�s �� � t ,-�•�''�+.+�� `��` � r�`� � �.
� � wa�,..*' �� '"") ".� �t�� i:. =r�i: '"+,��`� i. � � �� } E��
� �. ��" � i�� 4 t�4 E� :. e F�`'..,.{ �� � �� a�i
� "'+,.`� .� � a� �,.�„ � �'�t�..,tt^# ,-� t-� �4 r� ,re r�s � �
�� r� � �
� ���� � a���� � � �� .�� � �r �'y � ' �
..ty � �rt � h �s ���'
� �`W.-1�`,�,�7i, { ,� y b �.�� � ���'`�x rx��'� r��s�"' �`�� �� '�{ ty^*�,���.: �.#�,.
� sf� "` t � S^E"`� . �4y't r
� j� b„� , � '�,�.s j�:� ��,tf v.
. °�r� �����x'� '�'�" 'a 1.l����.
����^��, �` +,: ���� '-�*'�. d*��n'��t..''.:��"i�
a
� � � .. . ��.,�}s.'` :���...������+u,,�.'`�i:•
�����i�� ����i�ic��� -�
����rc������:��
� TopoqraphY — rolling with steep slopes to
east
� Environmental Constraints — Honey Creek
and its ravine result in steep slopes and a
high �rasion area on eastern portian o�F site
County's 2005 SurF�ce Water Design Manual,
Level 3 flow-cc�ntrol standards or greater are
recommended at time of development
��;I��:��� ���������� RT� �`���!(�
���"ttl�:��
� Fi re �� � ����
�� _ , ,
w�tn��, a�st��ct#zs �� N � �
: �� � �:�€-:
�.,�
� utl�It12S ��� �'
�,-
Within Water District#90 Service Area r�"'"�°'��
Wi�hin Rentan Sewer Service Area ���
� SChOOIS j�� ,����
Within Renton School Ristrict �t � 1�
�r• '��::�
��������� ���� ��� �������fi���
� ������
� �����
K.C. Land Use Map - �
Urban Residential 4-12 � � ��i �
dulac � '� � � �I� �
'� . �x�°;: ��+11�"�`��,�,.� ,���,.R:
��;,, _`'i /��::,,.
�ii � �� �.��►�r�'�i�
K.C. Zoninq - ��, �,
R-4 - Residential 4 �� ,.........� � �
du/ac* �� ; . ��11l�'����
�'""��: .'w#: �t�
'�Banuses up to 6 dutgr. ac. �,�' . � � �r�i
�' '"�'��' �il
SIT�E �� �Il�lli�■■I���i■i
Iiing Coiinh�� Zoni�i�11'Ia�
�������� ������ �� ��������
Renton Comp Plan Land � P�
Use Map — Residential ��
Single Family (RS) ���� ���� ��� �
� �
Possible Rentan Zanin �
R-S {� du/net acre) �; �
�..
. R�...T� �� �
Sitc
Re�nton C:on�pt-ehensi��e Pl�n
�������� ������������ �������� ��������
------- -;- - -
Policy FW-13. Cities are the " Renton would be the
appropriate provider of local � provider of urban services
urban services to Urban Areas i to the subject urban area
either directly or by contract �
Policy LU-32. A city may i The area is within Rentan's
annex territory only within its i PAA and it can provide a
designated PAA. Cities shall � full range of urban services
phase annexations to coincide � immediately to fhe subjec#
with the ability for the city to ; area
coordinate the provision of a full i
range af urban services
Policy LU-33. Undevefoped p�velapment is currently
lands adjacent ta a city should proposed within the subject
be annexed at the time area and it would receive
develpprnent is proposed to i ,� full range of urban
receive a full range of services , services
�������� ����m����������� �����€�����
��������, ����:�������
Policy LU-34. Unincorporated ; The subject site is
Urban Areas that are already � within Rentan's
urbanized and are �vithin a ' designated PAA and is
city's PAA are encouraged to considered to be �n
annex to that city in order to unincarporated Urb�n
receive urban se►vices Area that is urbanized
and ready to receive
urban services such as
sewer, psalice, road
maintenance, and local
government
��[����� ���r���r� ������ �����
C������i���
■ Preservation of natural � This annexatian does nafi affect
neighborhoods and the Honey Creek Estates
communities neighbarhood to the east
■ Use of physical Existing streets (Hoquiam� and
boundaries city boundaries define the site.
SR-900 to norkh would be mc�re
logicai northern baundary
■ Prevention of abnormally proposed boundaries are not
irregular boundaries irregular
■ Annexation of cities of The subject annexatian site is
unincorporated �reas urban in character and is
which are urban in (c�cated within Renton's
character designated PAA
������ � ����� ����������
■ Assumes 3 existinq houses w/ average
assessed value of $230,100
� Assumes 42 new homes w/in 10 years
� Assumes average assessed value of
$45a,000 for new singie-family homes
�r Assumes one-time park development cost
�f $12,406
������ ������
Current Full
Development Development
;— — —
Revenues ; $4,601 $83,360
Costs $5,920 $66,200
Surplus/ � ($1 ,319) $17,160
Deficit ;
;
C}ne time parks acquisition and develo�ment cost of$12,406
�����������
This proposed annexatian is generally
consistent with Countywide Planning
policies and relevant Boundar}� Review
Board C7bjectives and policies for
annexation
hia� major impediments ta the provision af
City �ervices were identified by providers
�
�����c.�����, ��►r��i���c�
Theoretically annexation generates a $17,160
surplus in 2006 dollars at build-out in an
estimated 10 years
Renton's proposed R-8 zoning is consis#ent
with its Comp Plan Single Family Residential
land use designatic�n
����������� �������
The City respectfully requests that the Boundarv
Review Board find that:
Although the Querin Annexation
complies with many relevant annexation
objectives and policies, consideration shauld
be given ta its possible expansion to the
north, and
A second public hearing on pc�ssible exp�nsian
shc�uld be held so that residents in tl�e area
can be heard from on this issue
� Tltctrtlt ��o�t
r
I If�l�;i� �.
��;`.
� r a� �
��, y �
�
::r
12
�
THE WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARYREVIEW BOARD
�,,,. FOR KING COUNTY
SPECIAL MEETING/PUBLIC HEARING
7.•00 PM
Tuesda�, Ma� 16, 2006
Hazen Higlz School
1101 Hoquiam Avenue NE
Reytton, WA
AGENDA
I. WITNESS SIGN IN-6:30 PM
�. It is from tlzis list tytat witnesses are calle� to testify.
II. CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 PM
� Charles Bootlz, Chair
III. ROLL CALL 4 �� - '�
��
�
� Michaell�Iarchand, Vice-Chair
Van Anderson Ethel Hanis
A Robert Cook Claudia Hirschey
� A.J. Culver v Roger Loschen
p Lynn Guttmann m Judy Tessandore
� V"� , � `� � �
������� � ,
,� � .�.����'�
�� ��° � , � �' ���� �
�� ' ,�°��- �� � ��� n� .
� ��� �� � �
��� �
�
AGENDA,May 16,2006, corit.
Page Tzuo
�
IV. FILE NO. 2222 - City of Rertton- Querin Arinexatiori
6:30 PM Introduction of E�ibits
7:00 PM Introductory Comments on Hearing Procedures and Swearing in of
Witnesses
7:15 PM Proponent: Presentation by City of Renton (20 Minutes)
7:35 PM Presentation by King County (20 Minutes)
7:55 PM Opponent: Government Jurisdictions (20 minutes) "'�
8:15 PM General Testimony: Groups are limited to ten minutes and individuals
have three minutes to speak
Rebuttal: City of Renton (10 minutes)
V. FILE NO. 2222 - City of Renton - Querin Annexation, Boarc� deliberatiort and
direction to the Staff on Resolution,and Hearing Decision
VL ADJOURNMENT
�
:
�"' AGENDA,May 16, 2006, corit.
Page Tlrree
BACKGROUND STATEMENT
The Boundar,y Review Board
The Boundary Review Board was created in 1967 by the legislature in part to"...provide a method of
guiding and controlling the growth of municipalities..." (RCW 36.93.010). There are seventeen such
boards in the State of Washington.
The Board is a quasi-judicial, administrative body empowered to make decisions on such issues as
incorporations, annexations, mergers, disincorporations, etc., by cities, towns, and sewer, water and
fire districts. It can approve, deny, or modify a proposal. Board decisions are final unless appealed to
the King County Superior Court. With an appeal the Court reviews the file, exhibits, transcript and the
board decision, rather than conducting a new hearing.
y�, Board members are residents of the County and serve for four-year terms. They are not allowed to
hold other local government offices or jobs. Their compensation is $50.00 per day for work on Board
business. Members may not properly discuss proposals under their consideration outside of the public
hearing (ex parte communications).
Appearance of Fairness Doctrine
In general, decision-makers such as Board members must not only be fair in their actions (i.e., have no
conflicts of interest), but must also, to the ordinary citizen, appear to be free of any position or influence
which would impair their ability to decide a case fairly. However, the State Supreme Court has held that
if a person is of the opinion that a decision-maker is so impaired, that opinion must be stated at the first
available opportunity.
SUMMARY OF HEARING PROCEDURES
Si�n-in to Speak
A roster will be found on the speaker's podium. Those who wish to testify must sign in before
witnesses are sworn. All speakers will be called from this list. If you sign in once, it is not
necessary to do so at any continuation of the hearing.
�
.
AGENDA,Ma�16, 2006, corit. �
Page FoT�r
Exhibits
Please submit e�ibits to staff for marking before the Call to Order. The Board must retain all e�ibits
until a decision is filed and the appeal period ends (ten days).
Speakers
Please state your name and address for the benefit of the Court Reporter prior to testifying. When
referring to an e�ibit, please state the exhibit letter.
Time Limits
If necessary, the Chair may employ a time limit of 3 minutes for individuals and 10 minutes for organized �
groups.
Testimonv
The Boundary Review Board Act requires the consideration of certain factors (see RCW 36.93.170) and
speci�es objectives the Board must seek to accomplish (see RCW 36.93.180). Testimony and evidence
related to these factors and objectives will be the most effective.
Cross-Examination
Witnesses generally may not question other witnesses or the Board. The Chair may allow cross-
examination of expert witnesses under limited circumstances as described in the Board's Rules of Practice
and Procedures.
Rebuttal
The rebuttal shall be limited to 10 minutes. Rebuttal must be prefaced by a citation of the disputed
testimony. Rebuttal may not include closing statements, a summary, or any additional information, unless
such information is in answer to questions and issues raised in previous testimony. �
,
AGENDA, May 16, 2006, cont.
,� Page Five
RCW 36,93.17a Factors to be con�idezad by board-- , � �
Incorporation proceedings exempt from state environmental policy
act. In reaching a decision on a proposal or an alterna��.ve, the
board shall consider the factors affectinq such proposal, which
shall�include, but noC be limited to the fol.lowinq:
� (1) Popularion and territory; populat3on density; land area
and land uses; comprehensive plans and zoning, as adopted under
-chapter 35. 63, 35A.63, or 36.70 RCW; c.omprehensiv.e .plans and
development requlations adopted under �chapter :36,70A ACW;
applicable service aqr.eements entered fnto under ch�pter 36.115 or
39.34 RCW; applicable interlocal annexat�on ;.agreemeats between a
�county anii its cities; per_capita assess.ed .valuation; topoqraphy;
natural boundaries and drainage basins, proxfmity to other
. populated areas; the existe.�ice and pres�rvatiori. .:of. prime .
aqricultural soils and prodt�+ctive agricultural :uses; the likelihoad .
of significant growth in the area and in adjacent inaorporatad and
unincorporated areas during the next �ten years; location and most.
desirable future location of community '.fa�i�.ities; -�
t2) Municipal services; need for inunicipal se.rvices; effect of
ordinances, qovernmental codes, requlatfons and resolutions on
existing uses;. present cost and adequacy o� qove�nmental servicea
and controls in area; prospects of governmental services fzom other :
sources; probable future �eeds for s�ch.�s�rvices and. controls; >
probable effect .of.p�oposal or alternative on cost. ancl adequ3cy o�.
services and conErols in area �nd ad�acent areaj. the effect orr t.he .
: finances, debt s�ructure, and cont�a tual otiliq$tions and,rights:of .
all affected.governmental units; and
�rrr (3) The effect of the proposal .or. alternative on adjacent:..
areas, on mutu�l economic and social interests, and on t,he loc�l'
governmental structure of the county.
The provisions of chapter 93.21C�RCW, State Enviranmental
Policy, shall not apply to incorporatian proceedings covered b,y :
chapter 35.02 RCW. (1997 c 429 � 39j 1989 .c 84 � 5; 1986 c 234 �
33; 1982 c .220 § Z; 1979 ex.s. c 192 § 1; .1967 c 189 § 17. J
RCW 36.93.180 Objectives of boundary r�view board: TFie .
decisions of the boundary review board� :shall attelapt to ,aChieve.=the
following objectives:
(1) Preservation of natural neiqhborhoods ahd commuriiti�s;
(2) Use of physical boundaries,: including but not limited �to
bodies of water, highways, and land con�tours; �
(3) Creation and preservation of locjical se�vice areas;
(4) Prevention of abnormally irreqular boundaries;
(5) Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities
and encouragement of incorporation of cities in excess .of ten
thousand population in heavily populatec! urban areas;
. (61 Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts; '
(7) Adjustment of impractical boundaries;
(8) Incorporation as cities or towns or annexation ta cities
or towns of unincorporated areas which are urban in character; and
(9) Protectiion of aqricultural and rural lands which are
designated for lonq term productive aqricultural and, resource use .
by a comprehensive plan adopted by the county legislative
authority. (19�9 c 84 § 6; 1981 c 332 § 10; 1979 ex.s. c 142 5 2;
�,, 1967 c 189 � �8. )
�`r��-�.� � , � 1\
}- 1 S
l�t i� / � -` f '_ I ( �-_
� i � ;
� �- ��- � --�
-� ' /`�- , L_� —- -�----
� �
AGENDA,May 16, 2006, cont. ` ,
Page Six � � ( I
1 ���
� ��
�
�-� ----- I� - I / ; � i
�
z
�
�- �c
o _
_ �
T St
9t
Querin Annexation ������"�
Exhibit F1: Proposed annexation boundary 0 400 800
��� Economic Ckvetopment,Neighborbaods&Svategic Planning �- —�
W . Alcx Piaach,Adminisvn�a
� .r..�n
i�
� - v , � ;�■ .
" � ' � � ll� � y ���. � - �
. • r�� �� ��
• w�l���u � � � ��a-
� ■ � ��� j1�J � �
�
, . � + �! �� � � � � I '� �� �� • r,�
,�ii1�hT/ ' ��ii � �� • . �
.r , � -
� ,� `� � --
�! �� r � . _ :�),,� � ��� � S- • �
, �
�� ,� � ' i � �� � � �i; ' �"� ,�
. � ' . ' �
_ �
� �4� `� �I��/�lt��� � � � � ��r1�_ �' ' �� j
..ii:� " � �1► �� ���� �s � !�m � • ..�
' � -
_
► � � •� '�
= .� � ', .v � ��
_ s �� � �, � ►
� � � �
- �� � s
� �� � ��M/►/
�� i� �� ��
— - �■
_ �
�� �r ;;:�%/',/�/ �t��tii� ��
� � �.%J"/�i . p�i .�i ='.n�I�L4'� �di"I�[�I
.�/.///I�/! � ,� ._ �
� I� '� 1 l//./.�''//� �� � � "���
■�u�u� E� , • .
�� � , � �s+r„ ; �m����� �—� iiiiii'�.,',
!: �'�,� � � ' �1����= �
���a �� w�� (� " ta�����:� .
���3i� ���� -�::� r�mni,��� , . ��.H :�
�
" '� � �'=°s� ��
%►�� � ■�� L �i���.it! � ■ �i�� ';
, i '!�
�1�w�� �l�11i1i
t�l'�tl ■ ' �: �� ��i � ��
►:+`�. � �� � � ■ �
►
� � � �► i� � � _
. � y �.. ..
� : !: :
������r �i�a�:��i��� � )���� w���� �� � ;C�
'� / : :� � �► ��� �L�t�� �� _,, ■ , � u�
�i��� i' ��ii ' ��'/�� �/���'�_ � �Y � p ��
!�/11: �i��� � ����11� � � � � �:
�,� !� k-+ � ,�� � � : ��� �
� � .. �►
I�I�1► � - �=���` �.r�
��Ii11� ■■ ■� .-.; -
I�I1i��1� ► • � ■��� � �..
��...*.. - - - ----
� � , � : 11 � 11
. ,, ,:...:..
............::,�.�;;;;;;:;.:;:..;:<::.::�.::....::: ^
iiir�.:�>'•�:;;::;:>.:
,. - � ,� � sl1 i
V
. . '- •
• � � � �r ' i �� ��� _ -
� , %/// • �; +
, r , ��l -�� ����
NOTICE OF INTENTION
PROPOSED QUERIN ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF RENTON
I. BACKGROUND/MAPS
1. The description of and reason for seeking the proposed action:
T'he proposed action is to annex approximately 7.3 acres to the City of Renton. Annexation
is sought by the proponents to develop under City of Renton regulations and processes and
to receive Renton public services.
'The annexation was initiated tlu�ough the 60% Direct Petition method under RCW
35A.14.120, 130, 140, and 150.
The proposed annexation area is located in the NE quarter(1/4)of the NE quarter of Section
10,Township 23 North,Range 5 East.
2. Copies of the Renton City Council minutes for actions taken relative to the proposed
annexation:
A. Exhibit A: Certified minutes of the August 1, 2005 public meeting of the
Renton City Council accepting the Querin Annexation 10% Notice
of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings petition and
authorizing the circulation of the 60%Petition to Annex.
B. Exhibit B: Certified minutes of the November 7, 2005 public hearing of the
Renton City Council accepting the 60% Direct Petition to Annex
and declaring the City's intent to annex the area, subject to the
actions of the Boundary Review Board.
3. Exhibit C: Certification of Sufficiency for the 60% Petition to Annex made by the King
County Department of Assessments dated September 13,2005.
4. Exhibit D: Legal description of the proposed annexation boundaries.
5. Pursuant to RCW 43.21C.222, annexations are exempt from SEPA.
6. The following maps are enclosed:
A. Exhibit E: King County Assessor's maps (two sets) displaying the proposed
Querin Annexation boundary.
B. Exhibit F: Vicinity maps displaying:
1) The proposed Querin Annexation boundary.
2) The City of Renton existing corporate limits relative to the
proposed annexation area.
3) All major streets and other major physical features.
� r
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Querin Annexation
12/21/OS
Page 2
4) The boundaries, including future service area boundaries, of all
cities or special service districts having jurisdiction in or near the
proposal.
NOTE: The City and County library service area boundaries are
coterminous with the City's corporate boundary.
5) King County Urban Growth Area and City of Renton Potential
Annexation Area boundaries established under the Growth
Management Act.
C. Exhibit G: A map of the current City of Renton corporate limits upon which
the proposed Querin Annexation boundaries have been delineated.
D. Exhibit H: City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations.
II. FACTORS THE BOARD MUST CONSIDER
1. Overview
A. Population: The population of the proposed annexation area is estimated to be
about 99 persons at full build out based upon 2.3 persons per household and a total
of 43 households. The City of Renton population as of April 2005 was 56,840.
B. Territorv: The proposed annexation area includes approximately 7.3 acres.
C. Population Densitv: The proposed density at buildout is 13.56 persons per gross
acre.
D. Assessed Valuation: The current assessed value of the properties proposed for
annexation is approximately$987,000. At build-out in 10 years, this is estimated to
be $17,200,000.
2. Land Use
A. Existin : Existing uses include three single-family homes with an estimated
population of seven persons.
B. Proposed: The annexation is proposed to facilitate the development of these
properties for single-family residential uses at up to eight(8)units per net acre.
3. Comprehensive Plans/Franchise(s)
A. Conformance with Count�wide Planning Policies adopted by King C,�ountv:
The proposed action is consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies in general,
and the following policies in particular:
. LU-31 In collaboration with adjacent counties and cities and King Counry, and in
consultation with residential groups in affected areas, each city shall
designate a potential annexation area. Each potential annexation area
shall be specific to each ciry....
, ,
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Querin Annexarion
12/21/OS
Page 3
LU-32 A city may annex territory only within its designated potential annexation
area. All cities shall phase annexations to coincide with the ability for the
city to coordinate the provision of a full range of urban services to areas to
be annexed.
The City of Renton has designated a Potential Annexation Area in the City's
Comprehensive Plan. (Exhibit H) Renton has the ability to provide a full range of
urban services to the area proposed for annexation and is the designated sewer
service provider for the East Renton Plateau.
LU-33 Undeveloped lands adjacent to that city should be annexed at the time
development is proposed to receive a full range of urban services.
New development is likely to proceed upon annexation to the City of Renton and
the availability of sewers. Sewer certificates have already been issued for new
housing developments to the east and south of the site and can easily be extended to
serve the subject annexation site when it develops.
FW-13.Cities are the appropriate providers of local urban services to urban areas
either directly or by contract.
Renton is prepared to provide a full array of local urban services to the area
including sewer, water, police, fire, local government and an array of other
community services. Renton is the designated sewer purveyor for the site and
Water District No. 90 is the designated purveyor of water under agreement with
King County, for the site.
B. King Countv Comnrehensive Plan/Ordinances
1) King County Planning under the Growth Management Act.
The subject area is designated Urban - 4-12 du/ac in the King County
Comprehensive Plan and is identified as being within Renton's Potential
Annexation Area on the County's Potential Annexation Areas Map. King
County planning efforts under the Growth Management Act have included
ensuring that development in the Urban Growth Area occurs at urban
densities and with urban level services available. The City of Renton has
planned for urban densities for this area and can provide urban services
within its negotiated service areas should annexation occur.
2) The following adopted King County Comprehensive Plan policies
specifically support the proposed annexation:
Chapter Two, Urban Land Use, Section II.B, DirectinQ Growth to Cities
and Urban Areas
U-203 King County should encourage most population and employment
growth to locate in the contiguous Urban Growth Area in western
King County, especially in cities and their potential annexation
areas.
Annexation would allow development of the subject properties to occur
within the City of Renton with urban services such as wastewater, police,
libraries, local government, and parks.
. ,
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Querin Annexation
12/21/OS
Page 4
Chapter Two, Urban Land Use, Section II.C, Urban Growth Area
Targets
U-208 King County shall provide adeguate land capacity for residential,
commercial and industrial growth in the urban unincorporated
area. This land capacity shall include both redevelopment
opportunities as well as opportunities for development on vacant
lands.
R-8 zoning on the subject properties would approximate the capacity
represented by the existing King County zoning, which is R-4. Renton's R-
8 zone would result is approximately eight percent more capacity than the
current County zoning, since Renton calculates density based upon net
acreage and the County's calculates density based upon �ross acreage. An
estimated 43 units could be provided under the County's R-4 zoning (with
bonuses) and approximately 46 units could be provided under Renton's
proposed R-8 zoning.
Chanter Two, Urban Land Use, Section III.A, Plannin� with Kin�
County's Cities for Future Annexation
U-301 King County should work with cities to focus countywide growth
within their boundaries and should support annexations within the
Urban Growth Area when consistent with the King Counry
Comprehensive Plan and Countywide Planning Policies.
U-304 King County should support annexation proposals when:
a. The proposal is consistent with the King County
Comprehensive Plan;
b. The proposed area is wholly within the Urban Growth Area
and within the ciry's designated Potential Annexation Area
(for annexations);
c. The city is planning for urban densities and e�cient land
use patterns consistent with the Counrywide Planning
Policies and King County land use plans; and,
d. Adopted Counrywide goals and policies for urban services,
environmental and cultural resource protection will be
supported.
The proposal is generally consistent with the King County Comprehensive
Plan and Land Use Map. The area proposed for annexation is wholly
within the Urban Growth Area and within Renton's Potential Annexation
Area. The City's Comprehensive Plan policies and development
regulations support countywide goals and policies for urban densities,urban
services and environmental and cultural resource protection. The proposed
R-8 zoning is urban, small lot zoning, which will achieve urban densities
and efficiencies consistent with adopted countywide goals and policies for
urban services.
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Querin Annexarion
12/21/OS
Page 5
3) Adopted King Count�p Plan designation: The adopted King County
Comprehensive Plan land use designation for the proposed annexation area is
Urban Residential - 4-12 dulac. This designation is implemented with the
County's R-4 Zone, which bonuses up to six units per acre, on the subject site.
4) Comparison of City and County regulations for sensitive areas, etc: With
annexation, King County ordinances and regulations would be supplanted with
those of the City of Renton. City of Renton ordinances and regulations
applicable to the proposed action include the following:
a. Re�ulations for the protection of sensitive areas: The City of Renton's
Critical Areas Ordinance (RMC 4-3-050) describes permitted and
prohibited activities and uses, waivers,modifications and variances, and
additional criteria and permit processes for development in critical
areas. Critical areas regulated by the Ordinance include aquifer
recharge areas, flood and geologic hazard areas, native habitat and
wetlands. Although specific regulations vary, Chapter 21A.24,
Environmentally Sensitive Areas, of the King County Code provides
comparable regulatory protection of sensitive areas. T'he City of Renton
Critical Areas Ordinance is available upon request.
b. Regulations for the preservation of agricultural or other resource lands:
Regulations preserving agricultural uses are not applicable to the
subject area, as the proposed annexation area is not within any of the
agricultural districts identified for first, second or third priority for the
purchase of development rights. Further, the property is not designated
for agricultural production or other resource lands in the King County
Comprehensive Plan and is not currently under agricultural use. The
City of Renton does not have a program authorizing transfer or
purchase of development rights.
c. Preservation of Landmarks or Landmark Districts: The City of Renton
has no regulations comparable to Chapter 20.62, Protection and
Preservation of Landmarks, Landmark Sites and Districts, in the King
County Code. However, no landmark sites or districts are lrnown to
exist in the subject annexation area.
d. Surface Water Control: The City of Renton has adopted the 1990 KinQ
Countv Surface Water Design Manual, by reference, in the City's
Drainage (Surface Water) Standards (RMC 4-6-030) as the design
standard for surface water control in development projects. Higher
standards such as those of the 2005 King Countv Surface Water Design
Manual, Level 2 standard are often applied through environmental
review.
C. City of Renton Comprehensive Plan/Franchise
1) City Plannin�Under the Growth Management Act
Renton City Council adopted the current Comprehensive Plan in 1995,
consistent with the requirements of the Growth Management Act. The 1995
Comprehensive Plan was updated in the 2004 Mandated Growth
Management Act Comprehensive Plan Review. The Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Map identifies Potential Annexation Areas, including the area
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Querin Annexarion
12/21/OS
Page 6
currently proposed for annexation, and shows land use designations for such
areas. (See Exhibit H, City of Renton Land Use Designations)
The proposal is consistent with the Land Use Element policies of the
Renton Comprehensive Plan that support annexation of lands:
• that are within Renton's Potential Annexation Area where the
availability of infrastructure and services allow for the development
of urban densities(Objective LU-1);
• that are vacant and subject to development pressure(LU-37.3);
• that are available for urbanization under county comprehensive
planning,zoning,and subdivision regulations(LU-37.5);
• for which the City of Renton should logically be the primary
provider of urban infrastructure and services(LU-36);
• that would include those who already use City services or who
impact City infrastructure(LU-41); and
• that includes environmentally sensitive areas and vacant land where
future development could adversely influence the environmental
and land use character of Renton(LU-42).
2) PAA status and PAA ag.reements with other cities, if anv: The City of
Renton has an adopted Potential Annexation Area. This area includes three
sub-areas, which are shown on Renton's Comprehensive Plan and on the
King County Interim Potential Annexation Area Map. The City has also
negotiated a PAA boundary agreement with the City of Kent. No PAA
agreement was necessary for the area currently proposed annexation.
3) Required Comprehensive Plan amendments, if anv: No amendment to
Renton's Comprehensive Plan is necessary to process the current proposed
annexation.
4) Comprehensive Plan approval date: Renton's current Comprehensive Plan
was initially adopted on February 20, 1995, with annual amendments in
subsequent years. The latest, 2004 Mandated GMA Comprehensive Plan
Review was completed in November 2004.
5) Required franchises to serve area: No franchise will be required for the
City of Renton to provide services to the subject area.
6) Pre-annexation Zoning Agreements: The subject area has not been the
subject of a pre-Annexation Zoning Agreement.
7) Proposed land use designation: The subject area is designated Residential
Single Family in the City's Comprehensive Plan. R-8 zoning is proposed to
supplant the existing King County R-4 zoning, consistent with the adopted
Residential Low Density land use designation upon annexation. Under
Renton's annexation process, zoning is adopted concurrent with the
adoption of the implementing annexation ordinance.
4. Planning data
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Querin Annexarion
12/21/OS
Page 7
A. Revenues/Expenditures
This analysis identifies the General Fund revenues and costs associated with
annexing the subject properties as they are currently developed, as well as
estimating the annual fiscal impact of their full development at some undetermined
point in the future. "Full development" does not equate to the absolute zoned
capacity. Rather, it includes an assumption that a portion of the subject properties
will not develop within the foreseeable future due to market forces and the choices
of individual property owners. All assumptions regarding revenues and costs are
based on existing standards or other comparable data,but actual results are likely to
vary from these estimates. In general, costs associated with utilities have been
assumed to be supported by the rates charged for those services.
Assessed Valuations
Units Population(est.) Assessed Valuation
Existin conditions 3 7 $987,000
Full develo ment est. $17,200,000
*Assumes new home value of$350,000 per unit.
1) Estimated Ci�Expenditures
City Services Current Full
Development Development
Contracted services $94 $1 424
Road Maintenance $0 $1 301
Fire Protection $1 234 $21 500
Police Protection $1,938 $29 350
Parks Maintenance $104 $1,579
Court Le al and Other $468 $7,094
Stormwater Maintenance $24 $63
Total ongoing costs $3,862 $62,311
2) Estimated City Revenues to be ag ined
Current Full
Revenue Source Development Development
Re ular Pro e Tax Le $3 099 $54 008
State-Shared Revenues $209 $3 164
Miscellaneous Revenues $862 $13 134
Excess Le $78 $1 352
Total revenues $4,248 571,658
3) Estimated Net Fiscal Impact
Net fiscal im act
Existin $386
Full $9 347
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Querin Annexation
12/21/OS
Page 8
3) Estimated Countv revenues lost: The estimated reduction in County
revenues would be$4,471 at current development(road and library levies,
excluding library bonds).
4) Estimated reduction in County expenditures: The estimated reduction in
County expenditures is anticipated to be minimal, as only a minor amount
of improved King County roadway exists in the proposed annexation area.
5) Estimated fire district revenue lost: The area proposed for annexation lies
within Fire District No. 25. T'he City currently provides fire services under
contract to Fire District No. 25. As consequence there is no estimated loss
of revenue to this district.
6) Estimated fire district expenditures reduced: The estimated savings to Fire
District No. 25 because of this annexation is minimal. The District is now
paying approximately $35 annually to the City for fire services, based upon
an estimated population of seven persons.
B. Services
1) Water Service
The proposed annexation is within both Renton's and District No. 90's
water service areas. These service areas would not change as a result of the
proposed annexation.
a) DirecbContract: The western two-thirds of the annexation area will
be served by the City of Renton upon annexation. The eastern third
of the area will continue to be served by District No. 90 for the
foreseeable future. Future development in this latter area will have
to notify District No. 90 regarding water availability and obtain a
certificate of water availability prior to future development.
b) Stora��e locations/Capacitv: The zoned residential capacity under
the existing King County zoning is slightly less than the capacity
under the proposed City of Renton R-8 zoning. Since population
growth under the City of Renton's proposed R-8 zoning is only
about seven percent more than allowed under the County's current
R-4 zoning, the District's capacity should be adequate for the water
demand generated by post-annexation development in the subject
area. If anything, the change in zoning that would occur upon
annexation of this small area would theoretically have only a minor
impact on storage capacity.
c) Mains to serve the area: Both the City of Renton and Water District
No. 90 will require developers to extend mains into the annexation
area as part of their future development proposals.
d) Financing of�roposed service: This will be financed by developers
and normal user fees for existing and new residents.
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Querin Annexation
12/21/OS
Page 9
2) Sanitary Sewer Service
a) Direct/Contract: Sewer service would be provided directly to the
proposed 7.18-acre annexation area by the City of Renton.
b) Mains to serve area: None of the annexation site is currently being
served by the City of Renton. However, the City Wastewater
Utility serves the Forest View Apartments to the west and Blue
Berry Place Condominiums to the southwest of the proposed
annexation,where it abuts the City boundary.
c) Disposal: Sewage disposal will be through METRO's treatment
facilities.
d) Capacity Available: Renton's sanitary sewer system has sufficient
capacity to accommodate full buildout of the proposed annexation
area with an estimated 124 homes.
e) Financing of proposed service: Improvements within this
annexation area would be anticipated to be made through developer
extensions or homeowner extensions in the future when residents
decide they want sewer hook-up.
3) Fire Service
a) Direct/Contract: The City of Renton currently provides fire
suppression services to the annexation area under contract with
King County Fire District No. 25. Following annexation, the City
of Renton would directly provide these services to the subject area.
b) Nearest stations: The annexation area is located between Fire
Station 12 in the City of Renton and Fire Station 75 in District No.
10. Fire Station 12, located at 1209 Kirkland Avenue NE, is 1.3
miles away to the west, and Station 16, located at the corner of 156`�
Avenue SE and SE 128'i' Street, is also 1.3 miles away, but to the
southeast.
c) Response time: Response time to any point within the proposed
annexation boundaries could range from four to six minutes. Both
Fire Stations 12 and 16 are approximately five minutes from the
subject site and will not change because of this annexation.
Therefore,there should be no change in the response time.
d) Staffin�: Station 12 is fully manned, with five firefighters on duty
per shift. Station 16 is also fully manned and has three firefighters
on duty per shift.
e) Major equipment: Major equipment located at Station 12 includes
two 1,500 gallon per minute pumpers and one aid car.
� Certified EMT/D-Fib personnel: All shift personnel at Station 12
are certified EMT/D-Fib.
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Querin Annexation
12/21/OS
Page 10
g) Fire Ratin�: Renton's fire rating is 3.0, as determined by the
Washington State Survey and Rating Bureau.
h) Source of dispatch: Valley Communication 911 service is the
source of emergency vehicle/aid dispatch.
5. General
A) Annexation agreements for extensions of service: No applicable annexation
agreements are in effect for the subject area.
B� Topography and natural boundaries: The site is relatively level with the eastern half
sloping away from 142° Avenue SE to the southeast, and the western half sloping
away from 142"d Avenue SE to the southwest.
B) Projected 10-year r�: The area is too small to make reasonable inferences from
large-area growth forecasts. The City projects about 104 new single-family units in
addition to the existing twenty units on the site. T'his is based on existing citywide
R-8 densities and assumptions regarding identified physical and regulatory
constraints to development of the site and the probable market availability of land
for new development.
D) Municipal or communitv services: With annexation, the property owners and
residents would have access to a full range of urban services including police, fire,
parks, libraries, community services, the City's neighborhoods program, annual
community events, and local,readily accessible, government.
E) Potential delays in imnlementing service deliverv: The area is currently
underserved in regards to park facilities according to the City's adopted level of
service standards. This shortfall is identified in the City's Parks, Trails and Open
Space Plan update. Staff estimates a one-time cost in excess of parks/recreation
mitigation fees of$22,280, as well as on-going maintenance costs of$1,579 for new
parks associated with this annexation.
The current waste hauler would continue to provide solid waste removal for seven
years after annexation, according to State law. At that time, the area would then be
included in the contract with the City's waster hauler. With the exception of parks
and solid waste removal,no delays are expected in implementing service delivery to
the area. City departments reviewing the annexation proposal indicated that they
would be able to adequately serve existing and future development. Water District
No. 90 is expected to continue to provide water service to the subject site, and has
not indicated any major obstacles to service delivery at this time.
F) Evaluation of adequacv, costs, or rates of service to area: Existing services to the
area appear to be generally adequate. As development occurs in the proposed
annexation area, demand for services will increase. It is assumed that the cost of
such services will be largely offset by increases in property taxes, services charges
and other revenues based on population. If the City were to assume this annexation
at current levels of development it would have a positive cash flow of an estimated
$386 per year. At full development, in an estimated ten years, the City would
realize an annual surplus of an estimated$9,347 per year.
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Querin Annexation
12/21/OS
Page 11
King County is the only alternative service provider for services that would be
assumed by the City of Renton upon annexation. Fire suppression services will not
change as a result of the proposed annexation since the City is already providing
these services to Fire District No. 25 under contract. And, school district
boundaries are not affected by annexations. As a result, the subject area will remain
within the Renton School District.
III. OBJECTIVES
T'he proposed Querin Annexation generally complies with all of the objectives of the Boundary
Review Board. These include the following:
1) Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities.
No detrimental impacts to existing neighborhoods or communities are anticipated to result
from the proposed action.
2) Use of physical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water, highways and
land contours.
The proposed annexation follows the existing city limits on its west and south boundaries.
Its northern boundary would be SE 112�`Street, if extended, and its southern boundary
would be SE 114`�', if extended. It is bounded on the west by 142id Avenue SE(Hoquiam
Avenue NE)and on the east by 144`�'Avenue SE,if extended.
3) Creation and preservation of logical service areas.
City staffs that have reviewed the proposed annexation have stated that the proposed
boundaries appear to represent logical extensions for the provision of City services. Also,
the Countywide Planning Policies state that cities are the appropriate providers of local
urban services to Urban Areas such as this. The proposal would,therefore, further both the
intent of the City annexation objectives and Countywide Planning Policies.
4) Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries.
The boundaries do not create abnormally irregular boundaries. If anything,this proposed
annexation will result in a somewhat more rational boundary. These boundaries,however,
should be thought of as being interim, as future annexations are anticipated in the area in the
foreseeable future. The City has issued sewer certificates with covenants for property
owners not to oppose annexation. These covenants should facilitate annexations in the area,
especially to the northeast of the site.
5) Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of
incorporation of cities in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated urban
areas.
Not applicable.
6) Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts.
Not applicable.
7) Adjustment of impractical boundaries.
This annexation is not being undertaken to adjust impractical city boundaries.
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Querin Annexation
12/21/OS
Page 12
S) Incorporation as cities or towns or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated
areas,which are urban in character
King County has designated this area for urban development.
9) Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long term
productive agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the
county legislative authority.
Not applicable. No portions of the proposed annexation area are designated Rural or
designated for long term productive agricultural or resource use in the King County
Comprehensive Plan.
fini
�r.rciiri��vi�
• � [, the undersigned City Clerk of the
C�ty of iZenton, Was�ington, certify
E�iibit A that this is a true and conect copy of
8/1/05 Minutes . Subscribed
RENTON CITY COUNCIL �d sealed this.12day of Dec. �20 05
Regular Meeting �`�@�'�'u� �• � _��
(.U,�1�
August 1,2005 ���yCo ncil Chambersl. Walton
Monday, 7:30 p.m. M I N U T E S Renton City Hall
CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler called the meeting of the Re�ton City Council
to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.
ROLL CALL OF TERRI BRIERE,Council President;DENIS LAW;DAN CLAWSON;TONI
COUNCILMEMBERS NELSON;RANDY CORMAN; DON PERSSON;MARCIE PALMER.
CITY STAFF IN KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER,Mayor;LINDA HERZOG,Interim Assistant
ATTENDANCE to the CAO; ZANETTA FONTES,Assistant City Attorney; BONNIE
WALTON, City Clerk; SANDRA MEYER,Transportation Systems Director;
ALEX PIETSCH,Economic Development Administrator;DON ERICKSON,
Senior Planner;CHIEF GARRY ANDERSON,Police Department.
PUBLIC MEETING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
Annexation: Querin II, accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the
Hoquiam Ave NE public meeting to consider the 10%Notice of Intent petition for the proposed
Querin II Annexation; 7.3 acres located between Hoquiam Ave. NE on the west
and 144th Ave. SE, if extended,on the east, south of SE 112th St.
Don Erickson, Senior Planner,explained that this annexation was originally
submitted for 10.14 acres, and the applicant was unable to obtain the signatures
for the 60%petition. Therefore,the annexation was resubmitted for 7.3 acres.
Mr. Erickson stated that the subject annexation site contains three existing
single-family dwellings and three vacant parcels. The topography of the
western portion of the site is relatively flat, whereas the eastern portion
contains steep slopes as a result of Honey Creek and its ravine. He noted that
King County's 1998 Surface Water Design Manual,Leve12 flow control
standards or greater are recommended at the time of development.
Reviewing the public services,Mr.Erickson reported that the site is served by
Fire District#25,Water District#90,Renton sewer,and the Renton School
District. He pointed out that the site is currently zoned R-4(four dwelling units
per gross acre)in King County, and Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates
the site as Residential Single Family,for which R-8 (eight dwelling units per
net acre)zoning is proposed. Mr.Erickson reviewed the fiscal impact of the
proposed annexation, indicating a surplus of$236 at current development and a
surplus of$9,278 at full development. He noted the estimated one-time parks
acquisition and development cost of$27,176.
Mr. Erickson stated that the annexation proposal is generally consiste�t with
City policies and relevant Boundary Review Board objectives. He concluded
that the annexation appears to further City business goals and is in the best
interests of the City.
Public comment was invited.
Martin Kenney, 18719 Yew Way, Snohomish, 98296, stated that he owns
property within the annexation area, and noted the successful development to
the south of the annexation site. Pointing out that Renton is a progressive city,
Mr. Kenney complimented the City's planning staff for their responsiveness.
August 1,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 270
There being no further public comment,it was MOVED BY CLAWSON,
. SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCII,CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING.
CARRIED.
. MOVED BY CLAWSON,SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL ACCEPT THE
QUERIN II 10%NOTICE OF INTENT TO ANNEX PETTTION,AND
ALTTHORIZE CIRCULATION OF THE 60%DIRECT PETITION TO
ANNEX REQUIRING THE ADOPTION OF CITY ZONING CONSISTENT
WITH THE COMPREHENSNE PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION,AND
PROPERTY OWNERS ASSUME A PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THE
CITY'S OUTSTANDING BONDED INDEBT'EDNESS. CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper flotiees having been posted and publrs�ed in
Annexation:Falk II, 102nd accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the
Ave SE&S SOth St public hearing to consider the 50/50 Direct Petition to annex for the proposed
Falk II Annexation, which consists of 6.4 acres, including the abutting 102nd
Ave. SE right-of-way,located west of 102nd Ave. SE and south of SE 185th
Pl., if extended.
Don Erickson,Senior Planner,explained that the subject annexation site was
originally part of larger annexation that was split into two pieces(the 6.3-acre
Falk Annexation was approved in December 2003). He reported that the site
contains five single-family dwellings,and is essentially flat with steeper slopes
on the western side. Public services are provided by Fire District#40,Soos
Creek Water and Sewer District, and Renton School District. Mr.Erickson
noted that roadway and stormwater improvements are likely.
Continuing,Mr.Erickson reported that existing King County zoning for the site
is R-4(four dwelling units per gross acre). The Renton Comprehensive Plan
designates the site as Residential Single Family, for which R-8(eight dwelling
units per net acre)is recommended. He pointed out that the R-8 zoning is
compatible with King County's R-6(six dwelling units per gross acre)zoning to
the east of the site.
Mr.Erickson stated that the fiscal impact analysis indicates a surplus of
$12,715 at full development,and an estimated one-time parks acquisition and
development cost of$22,381. Mr. Erickson concluded that the proposed
annexation is generally consistent with City policies and Boundary Review
Board criteria. He noted that the 50/50 Direct Petition annexation method is
not used very often,but is a valid method. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler
emphasized that the applicant made the deternunation to use this method,not
the City.
In response to Councilman Clawson's inquiry regarding access to the
annexation site from the north,Mr. Erickson explained that the topography of
the area to the north of the subject annexation is limiting as two major ravines
transverse the property.
Public comment was invited.
Correspondence was read from Joseph and Martha MacKenzie, 18533 102nd
Ave. SE,Renton, 98055, expressing the following concerns regarding the
construction occurring on the Falk Annexation site: property line dispute;the
removal of trees; flying debris from the wood grinder;the moving,compression
and leveling of dirt; the noise; and the dust. The MacKenzies questioned who
August 1,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 271
is liable for any damage to their house due to the vibrations, and they expressed
unhappiness that construction will continue if the Falk II Annexation is
approved.
� Joseph MacKenzie, 18533 102nd Ave. SE,Renton, 98055,expanded on his
concems regarding the construction occurring on the Falk Annexation site as
stated in the previously read correspondence. Responding to the Mayor's
inquiry,Mr. MacKenzie expressed his opposition to the proposed Falk II
-. Annexation due to the construction.
Mayor Keolker-Wheeler indicated that City staff will investigate the
MacKenzies'concerns regazding the construction related issues.
Robert McIntosh, 10104 SE 187th St.,Renton,98055, stated that he lives
adjacent to the southern boundary of the annexation area, and when
construction begins,he too will be experiencing the construction related
problems. He noted that water runs through the annexation site,and expressed
concern regarding the loss of the wildlife when the area is developed.
There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY CLAWSON,
SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
CARRIED.
Councilmembers Corman and Briere sympathized with the speakers,each
saying that development construction occurred near their homes as well.
Councilman Clawson noted that there will be an approval process for the
development of the subject site, and conditions concerning the construction
may be imposed. He indicated that under the State Growth Management Act,
smaller wild areas are sacrificed in order to have a more contiguous area on the
other side of the urban growth boundary.
MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL: ACCEPT
THE 50/50 METHOD DIItECT PETTTION TO ANNEX; SUPPORT FUTURE
R-8 ZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND
USE DESIGNATION; AND AUTHORIZE THE ADMINISTRATION TO
FORWARD THE NOTICE OF INTENT PACKAGE TO THE BOUNDARY
REVIEW BOARD. CARRIED.
ADMIIVISTRATIVE Linda Herzog, Interim Assistant to the CAO,reviewed a written administrative
REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work
programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2005 and beyond. Items noted
included:
� The City distributed 15,548 copies of the Renton Community Resource
Directory, which is printed in eleven languages, in the first six months of
2005.
� The King County Department of Public Health requested that the east end
of the swimming beach at Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park be closed to
swimmers until further notice. This action was taken because levels of
fecal coliform and E. coli fluctuate widely from day to day in that section
only. The City is in the process of contracting a water quality consulting
firm to determine the origin of the contamination.
August 1,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 272
� Residents are encouraged to participate in the Salmon Watcher Program by
observing salmon-bearing streams during the salmon run season. An
educational presentation will be held August 31 st,from 7:00 p.m.to 9:00
p.m. at the Renton Community Center for interested volunteers.
CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing.
Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 7/18/2005. Council concur.
7/18/2005
Appointment: Planning Mayor Keolker-Wheeler appointed Jimmy Cho,241 Factory St. N.,Renton,
Commission 98055, and Robert Bonner,91 Williams Ave. S.,Renton,98055,each to the
Planning Commission for a three-year term expiring 6/30/2007. Refer to
Community Services Committee.
Finance: Administrator Administrative,Judicial and Legal Services Department recommended
Appointment(Michael confirmation of the appointment of Michael Bailey as the new Finance and
Bailey), Hire at Step E Information Services Administrator,effective 9/1/2005; and approval of his
salary at Step E of the salary range. Council concur.
CAG: OS-098,Maple Valley City Clerk reported bid opening on 7/20/2005 for CAG-OS-098,Maple Valley
Hwy Improvements Cedar Hwy. (SR-169)Improvements Phase 1 Cedar River Park Access;five bids;
River Park Access, Sanders engineer's estimate$842,287; and submitted staff recommendation to award the
General Construction contract to the low bidder,Sanders General Construction,in the amount of
. $972,213. Refer to Transportation(Aviation)Committee for discussion of
funding.
WSDOT: 2005 State Highway City Clerk submitted annual Washington State Department of Transportation
Routes Certification certification of State Highway Routes within the limits of incorporated cities
and towns as of 7/1/2005 (required by RCW 47.24.010). Information.
Development Services: Development Services Division recommended acceptance of a deed of
Fotheringill Short Plat,ROW dedication for additional right-of-way along the frontage of Duvall Ave.NE to
Dedication,Duvall Ave NE fulfill a requirement of the Fotheringill Short Plat(SHP-04-134). Council
concur.
Annexation:Akers Farms, Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
108th Ave SE&SE 164th St submitted 60% Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Akers Farms
Annexation and recommended that a public hearing be held on 8/15/2005 to
consider the petition and R-8 zoning; 13.3 acres located south of Puget Drive S.
and east of 108th Ave. SE,if extended. Council concur.
CAG: OS-008,Lake Transportation Systems Division submitted CAG-OS-008,Lake Washington
Washington Blvd Slip Plane, Blvd. Slip Plane; and requested approval of the project, authorization for final
Northwest Cascade pay estimate in the amount of$121,837.47,commencement of 60-day lien
period, and release of retained amount of$22,384.32 to Northwest Cascade,
Inc.,contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur.
Transportation: Rainier Ave S Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement with
&Hardie Ave SW KPG, Inc. in the amount of$115,639.07 for design engineering services for the
Improvement Projects Design, Rainier Ave. S. and Hardie Ave. SW Improvement projects,Phase I. Approval
KPG Inc was also sought to transfer funds totaling$200,000 from the NE 4th St. and
Hoquiam Ave. NE project and the Transit Center Video project to these
projects. Refer to Transportation(Aviation)Committee.
August 1,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 273
Vacation: Bremerton Ave NE, Utility Systerns Division reported submittal of the appraisal performed for the
Liberty Ridge,VAC-04-007 vacation of portions of Bremerton Ave. NE, south of NE 4th St. (VAC-04-007;
Liberty Ridge LLC, petitioner), and requested that Council accept the appraisal
and set compensation for the right-of-way at$5,170. Council concur.
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL APPROVE
THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Glenn Davis,Managing Partner,BDJS
Citizen Comment: Davis- Associates, 1900 W. Nickerson,PMB 116-168, Seattle, 98119,requesting
Oversizing Request for reimbursement in the amount of$51,264.24 for utilities oversizing along
Reimbursement, Urban Crafts, Olympia Ave. NE for the Urban Crafts development. MOVED BY PERSSON,
BDJS Associates SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL REFER THIS
CORRESPONDENCE TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Citizen Comment: Chan- Correspondence was read from Evan Chan,Project Manager,N&C Investments
Waiver Request for LLC, 7432 SE 27th St.,Mercer Island,98040,requesting waiver of
Development&Mitigation development and mitigation fees for the Morris Avenue Townhomes
Fees, Morris Ave Townhomes, development located at 513 S. 2nd St. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED
N&C Investments BY PALMER, COIJNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE
FINANCE COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Added Councilwoman Nelson noted receipt of a letter from Rev. Kenneth Colman,Co-
Citizen Comment: Colman- Chair Renton Domestic Violence Task Force,United Christian Church, 1707
Municipal Court Security Edmonds Ave. SE,Renton,98058, regarding the lack of security in the Renton
Concerns Municipal Court. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler indicated that tt�e Administration is
reviewing the matter.
UNFIIVISHED BUSINESS Planning and Development Committee Chair Clawson presented a report
Plannin�&DeveloUment regarding the compensation for the City of Renton's street vacation request on
Committee behalf of Bales Limited Partnership(VAC-04-006). The Committee
Vacation: NE 4th St,City of recommended concurrence in the staff recommendation to accept the appraisal
Renton,VAC-04-006 and waive compensation for the vacation of an eight-foot by 150-foot portion of
NE 4th St.,located east of Rosario Ave.NE. MOVED BY CLAWSON,
SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE
REPORT. CARRIED.
Community Services Community Services Committee Chair Nelson presented a report
Committee recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation that Renton enter into
Human Services: 2006-2008 the joint interlocal agreement to receive Community Development Block Grant
CDBG Interlocal Agreement, funds through the King County Consortium for 2006-2008. The Committee
King County further recommended that the resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk
to enter into the agreement be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED
BY NELSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 274 for resolution.)
Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending approval
Finance: Vouchers of Claim Vouchers 239307-239740 and one wire transfer totaling
$1,882,430.27; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 58507-58875,one wire
transfer, and 620 direct deposits totaling$2,067,280.59. MOVED BY
PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
August 1,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 274
Transnortation(Aviation) Transportation(Aviation)Committee Chair Palmer presented a report
Committee recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to adopt the annual
Transportation: 2006-2011 TIP update of the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program(TIP), 2006-2011,
and the Arterial Street Plan. The proposed TIP includes four new projects:
� Rainier Ave. (S. 4th Pl. to S. 2nd St.);Hardie Ave. SW Transit/Multi-Modal;
May Creek Bridge Replacement; and School Zone Sign Upgrades. Six
completed or cancelled projects were dropped from the program The
Committee further recommended that the resolution regarding this matter be
presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY
PERSSON,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.
CARRIED. (See below for resolution.)
RESOLUTIONS AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption:
ORDINANCES
Resolution#3762 A resolution was read updating the City's Six-Year Transportation
Transportation: 2006-2011 TII' Improvement Program, 2006-2011. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED
BY NELSON,COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ.
CARRIED.
Added A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an
Resolution#3763 interlocal cooperative agreement with King County regarding the Community
Human Services: 2006-2008 Development Block Grant Program. MOVED BY NELSON,SECONDED BY
CDBG Interlocal Agreement, PALMER, COIJNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLIJTION AS READ. CARRIED.
King County
The following ordinance was presented for first reading and referred to the
Council meeting of 8/8/2005 for second and final reading:
Transportation: Street Closure An ordinance was read amending Section 9-9-3 of Chapter 9, Street Closure,of
Ordinance Title IX(Public Ways and Property)of City Code by allowing road closures of
one day or less to be governed by administrative action. MOVED BY
PERSSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THE
ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FIlVAL READING ON 8/8/2005.
CARRIED.
The following ordinance was presented for second and final reading and
adoption:
Ordinance#5151 An ordinance was read amending Section 4-1-220,Property T�Exemption for
Planning: Multi-Family Multi-Family Housing in Residential Targeted Areas,of Chapter 1,
Housing Property Tax Administration and Enforcement,of Title IV(Development Regulations)of
Exemption Modifications City Code by modifying the designated residential targeted areas and other
project eligibility requirements. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY
CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL
CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS Referring to the 2006 Budget schedule,Council President Briere expressed
Budget: 2006 Schedule concern regarding the review of fees and rates and the associated ordinances
prior to the presentation of the budget to Council. Discussion ensued
conceming the timing of the approval of any proposed fee and rate ordinance.
Mayor Keolker-Wheeler stated that the budget schedule will be reviewed.
Council: Information Request Councilman Persson requested status reports on the following items: the hiring
on Various Issues of a new librarian; the proposed parks maintenance facility; the Skyway
Towing court case; the prostitution arrests at massage parlors and related City
August 1,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 275
Attorney vouchers; and the replacement of broken window glass at the Pavilion
Building and whether the glass was defective and under wananty.
Policy: Bidding and MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COIJNCIL REFER
Contracting Requirements THE POLICY ON CONTRACTS TO THE FINANCE COMMTTTEE.*
(#250-02) In response to Mayor and staff inquiry,Councilman Persson clarified that he
wants a general discussion on the contract policy, including how contracts are
handled and how they are reported to the Council.
*MOTION CARRIED.
Council: Committee of the Council President Briere announced that Committee of the Whole will meet on
Whole,Annexation Policy 8/9/2005,from 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., in the Council eonference Room to
(8/9/2005) discuss annexation policy.
EXECUTIVE SESSION MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCII.RECESS INTO
AND ADJOURNMENT EXECUTNE SESSION FOR APPROXIMATELY 30 MINUTES TO
DISCUSS LITIGATION WITH NO OFFTCIAL ACTION TO BE TAKEN
AND THAT THE COUNCIL MEETING BE ADJOURNED WHEN THE
EXECIJTNE SESSION IS ADJOURNED. CARRIED. Time: 8:45 p.m.
Executive session was conducted. There was no action taken. The executive
session and the Council meeting adjourned at 9:16 p.m
1��kl,�t.Lt.t.C�� �GL�.L�.I-r��
Bonnie I. Walton, CMC,City Clerk
Recorder: Michele Neumann
August 1,2005
RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR � '
Office of the City Clerk
COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
August 1,2005
COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 8/08 Introduction of New Finance &
(Briere) 6:30 p.m. Information Services Administrator-
Michael Bailey;
2nd Quarter Financial Report
TUES., 8/09 Annexation Policy and Strategy
2:OOpm-S:OOpm *Councii Conference Room*
COMMUNITY SERVICES MON., 8/08 John G. DuBois Appointment to Library
(Nelson) 4:30 p.m. Board;
Jimmy Cho and Robert Bonner
Appointments to Planning Commission
FINANCE MON., 8/08 Vouchers;
(Persson) 5:00 p.m. Financial Management Policies
PLANNTNG&DEVELOPMENT THURS., 8/04 CANCEL�ED
(Clawson)
PUBLIC SAFETY
(I,aw)
TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) THURS., 8/04 AT&T Airport Lease Addendum;
(Palmer) 3:00 p.m. AcuWings LLC Airport Operating Permit
and Sublease;
Aerodyne Aviation Airport Lease
Addendum;
KPG Contract for Rainier Ave. S. &
Hardie Ave. SW Improvement projects;
Maple Valley Hwy. Improvements Cedar
River Access Project Bid Award
UTILITIES MON., 8/04 CANCELLED
(Corman)
NOTE: Corrunittee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers unless otherwise noted. All other committee meetings are held in the Council
Conference Room uniess otherwise noted.
�.t...��� �e avr�i u
. � I, the undersigned City Clerk of the
City of Renton, Washington,certify
EX�llblt B that this is a true and correct copy of
11/7/05 Minutes . Subscribed
RENTON CI'I'Y COUNCIL and sealed this 12da � Dec_�Zp 05
Regular Meeting '
Cit� �;lerk B�nnie I. Walton
November 7,2005 ✓ Council Ghambers
Monday,5:00 p.m. M I N U T E S Rentou City I-�all
CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler called the meeting of the Renton City Council
to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.
ROLL CALL OF TERRI BRIERE, Council President;MARCIE PALMER; DON PERSSON;
COUNCILMEMBERS RANDY CORMAN; TONI NELSON;DAN CLAWSON; DENIS LAW.
CITY STAFF IN KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER,Mayor;JAY COVINGTON,Chief
ATTENDANCE Administrative Officer;LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; BONNIE
WALTON, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN,Planning/Building/Public
Works Administrator; ALEX PIETSCH,Economic Development
Administrator; DON ERICKSON, Senior Planner;DEI�iNIS CIJLP,
Community Services Administrator;MIKE WEBBY, Human Resources
Administrator; MICHAEL BAII.EY,Finance and Information Services
Administrator; LINDA HERZOG, Interim Assistant to the CAO; CHIEF LEE
WHEELER, DEPUTY CHIEF ARTHUR LARSON, and DEPUTY CHIEF
LARRY RUDE,Fire Department;CHIEF GARRY ANDERSON,
COMMANDER FLOYD ELDRIDGE,COMMANDER KATIE MCCLINCY,
and COMMANDER KEVIN MII.OSEVICH,Police Department.
SPECIAL Jim Medzegian, member of the Return to Renton Cruise-In Car Show Steering
PRESENTATIONS Committee,stated that the mission of the car show is to raise funds for the
Community Event: Return to Police Department's youth education programs. Mr. Medzegian reported that
Renton Car Show, 200 vehicles were displayed at the 15th annual event held at Renton Memorial
Contribution of Proceeds to Stadium on July 9th. He showed pictures taken at the event, and reviewed the
Police Department vision for future car shows, which includes increasing the number of vehicles,
expanding family activities,and moving the 2007 event to downtown Renton.
Mr.Medzegian presented Police Chief Garry Anderson with a check in the
amount of$3,200. Chief Anderson accepted the money with appreciation,
saying that the Police Department just authorized two grants to the Renton
School District for a middle school learning program.
AJLS: Mayor's Presentation of Mayor Keolker-Wheeler presented her proposed City of Renton 2006 Budget to
2006 Budget members of the City Council and Renton citizens. She acknowledged the
policy work and guidance provided by the City Council, and the efforts of City
staff.
The Mayor reviewed the 2005 achievements, which include: RenStat(a
program that addresses, identifies, and targets crime), the Federal Reserve Bank
of San Francisco(broke ground this summer on its new facility in Renton),
downtown redevelopment, the securing of Federal and Sound Transit funds for
important transportation projects,REACT(a prograrn that addresses non-
criminal activities and nuisance abatement), volunteerism such as the Mayor's
Planting Day, the Clean Sweep program,the operation of the Henry Moses
Aquatic Center at a profit, and the master plan for the Heather powns
neighborhood park. ,
Mayor Keolker-Wheeler noted the continuing challenge of high expectations
versus limited resources. Voter-enacted limits on taxes and State mandated tax
exemptions continue to constrain the City's revenues. Reporting that property
November 7,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 378
taxes make up almost one-third of the City's general governmental revenues,
she explained that with the limit on the amount the City can collect and the
� continuing increase in the value of propeRy,the actual amount of the tax levy
� declines. It has declined over the past ten years from$3.60 per thousand
dollars of assessed valuation to$3.07. She pointed out that in the meantime,
the growing economy has added significant new construction and annexations,
which helps the property tax base grow.
Turning to the key 2006 initiatives, the Mayor began with the promotion of
neighborhood revitalization by proposing the continuation of the REACT
program, which includes adding three police o�cers; the continuation of the
Clean Sweep program; and the completion of the Highlands Sub-Area Plan.
The promotion of Citywide economic development includes the redevelopment
of the Boeing property("The Landing"project),the Downtown Action Plan,
and on-going business recruitment.
Continuing, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler discussed the management of growth
through sound urban planning,highlighting various transportation projects.
. She noted that the proposed budget includes funds to build the Heather powns
neighborhood park, and a new parks and facilities maintenance complex. In
regards to annexations, the Mayor explained that State and King Gounty
policies require the City to explore annexing surrounding unincorporated areas.
The City is trying to respond to these demands in a balanced and objective way
that dces not negatively impact existing residents.
Continuing with the meeting of service demands that contribute to a livable
community,the Mayor reported that the proposed budget maintains existing
service levels,proposes no new taxes,dces not use reserves to balance the
General Governmental Budget, updates user fees such as fire inspection fees
and system development charges, and implements an annexation fee. The
budget proposal adds: three police officers, one fire inspector,one fire support
staff inember, local matching funds for a grant to potentially add three
firefighters,court security measures,and two staff positions and others costs
related to operating the new Maplewood Water Treatment Facility.
Mayor Keolker-Wheeler stated that the total proposed 2006 Budget is
ap�roximately$171.2 million, of which$72.5 million is the General
Governmental Budget. The proposed budget includes increasing the water and
stormwater system rates by 3%,and the wastewater system rate by 4%.
Mayor Keolker-Wheeler proposed that the City Council partner with her in
2006 to engage in a comprehensive"priorities of government" process with the
following goals in mind: alignment of City services with community needs and
priorities, continued accountability,and effective communication. She
explained that the City needs to strike the right balance between what the
community needs from its local government, and the amount of resources
necessary to accommodate those needs. The Mayor emphasized that this
process will be a way to examine unmet needs, and ensure that the City is using
its scarce resources in the best way possible.
PUBLIC HEARINGS This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
Annexation: Querin II, accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the
Hoquiam Ave NE public hearing to consider the 60%Petition to Annex and R-8 zoning for the
proposed Querin II Annexation; 7.3 acres located between Hoquiam Ave. NE
on the west and 144th Ave. SE, if extended, on the east, south of SE 112th St.
November 7,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 379
Senior Planner pon Erickson reported that the annexation area contains three
single-family dwellings. The topography of the site is relatively flat where it
abuts Hoquiam Ave. NE, and the eastern portion contains steep slopes as a
result of Honey Creek and its ravine. He noted that King County's 2005 surface
water design standazds or greater are recommended at the time of development.
The site is served by the following public services: Fire District#25,Water
District#90,Renton sewer, and the Renton School District.
Mr.Erickson stated that existing King County zoning is R-4(four dwelling
units per gross acre),and the Renton Comprehensive Plan designates the site as
Residential Single Family,for which R-8 (eight dwelling units per net acre)
zoning is proposed. He indicated that the proposed annexation is generally
consistent with City annexation policies and relevant Boundary Review Board
criteria. In regards to the fiscal impact analysis,Mr. Erickson estimated a
surplus of$236 at current development, a surplus of$9,278 at full
development, and a one-time parks acquisition and development cost of
$27,176.
Mr.Erickson indicated that the proposed annexation does not present any major
impediments to the provision of City services to the area. He concluded that
the annexation appears to further Renton business goals and is in the best
interests of the City.
Public comment was invited.
Mayor Keolker-Wheeler referred the request by Virginia Broyles, 11224 142nd
Ave. SE,Renton, 98059, for infornlation regarding utility rates and the sewer
system to Mr. Erickson.
Jim Montcrief, 11216 142nd Ave. SE,Renton, 98059, stated that an additional
house exists in the annexation area,for a total of four dwellings.
There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY CLAWSON,
SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
y CARRIED.
MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE
QUERIN II DIRECT PETTTION TO ANNEX, SUPPORT R-8 ZONIIVG
CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSNE PLAN RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE FAMILY LAND USE DESIGNATION,AND AUTHORIZE THE
ADMINISTRATION TO SUBMTI'THE NOTICE OF INTENT PACKAGE
TO THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD. CARRIED.
Planning: Boeing Subdistrict This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
1B Conceptual Plan accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the
public hearing to consider the Bceing Subdistrict 1B Conceptual Plan for a
second phase of redevelopment of surplus property located south of N. 8th St.
and east of Logan Ave. N.
Alex Pietsch,Economic Development Administrator,explained that conceptual
planning is a requirement of the 2003 development agreement between the City
and Bceing, which pertains to the future redevelopment of Bceing Renton Plant
site. Conceptual planning provides the City with certainty that its vision will be
met,and confidence for its infrastructure commitments. He reported that three
subdistricts were created within this site, which bears the Urban Center-North
(UC-N) land use designation, and pointed out that a conceptual plan has already
been adopted for Subdistrict lA.
November 7,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 380
Mr. Pietsch reviewed the conceptual plan requirements, which include
consistency with the UC-N vision,a description of the development,and an
economic benefit analysis. He indicated that the Subdistrict 1B Conceptual
Plan divides the property into two distinct parts. The northern 21 acres is
cunently under a "right of first offer" agreement with Harvest Partners and
likely will be sold in the very near future and be used for retail development.
The southern 31 acres, which is not expected to be declared surplus in the near
future,contains 660,000 square feet of existing office buildings and remaining
land for in-fill development.
Continuing,Mr. Pietsch reviewed the economic benefits associated with the
development of the two parts of Subdistrict 1B such as job creation and
revenues,and he noted that the conceptual plan meets the vision of the UC-N
designation. He reported that staff proposes the following two conditions to the
plan: 1)Park Ave. N. be designated as a pedestrian-oriented street, and 2)
transit facilities be allowed within the northern 21-acre portion should funding
opportunities arise and the development of such facilities support the
surrounding development and be supported by the property owner(s).
Mr.Pietsch stated that staff recommends approval,with conditions,of the
Bceing Subdistrict 1B Conceptual Plan. He indicated that the related
Committee of the Whole report will be presented to Council for adoption,and
if approved,Boeing will then present its Planned Action for Council
consideration.
Responding to Councilman Clawson's inquiry regarding the potential transit
facility and the financing of the infrastructure,Mr. Pietsch stated that Sound
Transit's Sound Move 2 plan consists of a parking garage and a bus rapid transit
facility. He described future road and trunk utility infrastructure improvements,
including the realignment and widening of Park Ave. N., the widening of Logan
Ave. N., a new N. lOth St., and the extension of N. 8th St. He explained that as
part of the 2003 Boeing development agreement, the City will build main
arterial roads and trunk utility lines deemed necessary for the project as long as
there is revenue from the development allowing two-thirds of that revenue to
support debt service on bonds. The remaining one-third would be for the
general fund to support City services.
Discussion ensued regarding the number of lanes proposed for Logan Ave. N.,
the improvements to various area streets such as Park Ave. N.and Garden Ave.
N.,the ability of the utility infrastructure to support future expansion of the
roads,and the traffic flow in the area. In response to Councilman Corman's
comments,Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Gregg Zimmerman
noted that the City is reevaluating the traffic counts as part of the design
process for the area's roadway system, and he described the findings and the
adjustments that are being made.
Public comment was invited.
Ray Giometti, 323 Pelly Ave. N., Renton,98055, suggested that the widening
of Logan Ave. N. occur sooner than later; otherwise,traffic will be forced onto
Park Ave. N., fracturing the North Renton neighborhood. Pointing out that his
neighborhood is located across the street from the southern 31-acre portion of
Subdistrict 1B,Mr. Giometti expressed opposition to the development of the
land for big-box retail use.
November 7,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 381
Mike O'Donin,423 Pelly Ave. N.,Renton, 98055, expressed concern that
Logan Ave.N. will become a tra�c choke point,thereby increasing transit
traffic on Park Ave. N. He asked for further review of the Logan Ave. N.
expansion.
Richard Zwicker,446 Pelly Ave.N.,Renton, 98055, agreed with the previous
speakers'comments. He confirmed that the original plan was for Logan Ave.
N. to be the main thoroughfare,and for Park Ave. N. to be pedestrian friendly.
In response to Council inquiries,Mr. Pietsch confirmed that the street network
design was adopted in the 2003 development agreement with Boeing,and the
subject conceptual plan is a separate matter. Chief Administrative Officer Jay
Covington pointed out that since Bceing owns the right-of-way on Logan Ave.
N., the City dces not have the ability to expand the road beyond ttu�ee lanes at
this time.
Councilmembers Corman and Palmer suggested further review of the
transportation plan for the subject area.
Lee Chicoine,406 Burnett Ave. N.,Renton, 98055,expressed concern about
the flow and amount of traffic, saying that he wants Logan Ave. N. expanded to
five lanes to prevent a choke point.
Nora Schultz,540 Williams Ave. N.,Apt. 12,Renton, 98055, stated her desire
for consistent traffic flow on Logan Ave. N.,and less traffic on N. 6th St. Ms.
Schultz suggested further review of the matter.
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY PALMER,COUNCIL CLOSE THE
PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED.
MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL REFER THE
TRANSPORTATION PLAN RELATED TO THE BOEING PROPERTY
DEVELOPMENT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FOR A BRIEFING.
CARRIED.
ADMIIVISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative
REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work
programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2005 and beyond. Items noted
included:
� City Hall Information Desk volunteers were recently presented certificates
of appreciation at a dinner hosted by City Clerk Division staff. Since the
program s establishment in 1984, the volunteers have given over 51,000
hours of excellent service to the City.
� Work is now underway on the SW 27th St./Strander Blvd. Connection,
Segment 1,construction project, which initially will provide access to the
proposed Federal Reserve Bank facility and, ultimately, will result in a new
five-lane arterial connecting Renton and Tukwila.
AUDIENCE COMMENT Sandel DeMastus, 1137 Harrington Ave. NE,Renton, 98056, said she is an
Citizen Comment: DeMastus - independent producer with public access cable channel 77,and announced that
Firefighter Tribute Program she has completed her firefighter tribute program, which will air on channel 77.
She presented a copy of the program to the Council,and suggested that it be
cablecast on Renton's government access channel 21 as well.
November 7,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 382
Citizen Comment: Blake- Jay Paul Blake, 17627 133rd Pl. SE,Renton, 98058, stated that he is a member
Fairwood Incorporation of the Fairwood community,and asked the City to consider initiating the
annexation of the proposed Fairwood Incorporation area into Renton's
boundaries. Noting that he has attended several meetings organized by the
Fairwood Task Force, he expressed his dismay at the inaccuracy of some of the
statements made by the speakers. Mr. Blake indicated that he opposes the
incorporation for reasons related to the limited financial viability of proposed
city.
Mr. Blake cited passages from the Fairwood Incorporation feasibility study
concerning the proposed city's financial viability.
MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL ALLOW THE
SPEAKER FIVE ADDITIONAL MINUTES FOR HIS COMMENTS.
CARRIED.
Mr.Blake continued with his review of the feasibility study. He concluded that
Renton is in a strong financial position,and consequently,the residents of the
Fairwood area will be best served by being annexed to the City of Renton.
Citizen Comment: Finlayson- Laurie Finlayson, 14224 SE 163rd Pl.,Renton,98058, supported Mr. Blake's
Fairwood Incorporation request that Renton consider annexing the Fairwood area. She expressed her
surprise at some Fairwood residents'negative opinions of Renton,and surmised
it may be because they do not relate to Renton since much of the area resides
within the Kent School District. Ms.Blake indicated that the analysis of the
financial feasibility of the proposed city did not convince her that incorporation
will work. She stated her desire to be apprised of all the options, including a
comparison of both incorporation and annexation to Renton, in order to make
an informed decision.
Discussion ensued regarding the Fairwood Incorporation effort; Renton's
practice to wait for parties to express interest in annexing to the City;
regulations concerning the allowance of an annexation effort while an
incorporation effort is pending; the possibility of an advisory vote on the
interest of Fairwood residents annexing to Renton; the unlikelihood that the
vote for the Fairwood Incorporation will occur in February 2006,as the
Boundary Review Board will be conducting hearings in January and February;
Fairwood residents'perception of Renton;Council's stance on the annexation of
the Fairwood area to Renton; and the provision of information concerning
annexation to Renton.
Mayor Keolker-Wheeler asked Economic Development Administrator Alex
Pietsch to research the questions that surfaced during the discussion.
Councilman Clawson acknowledged the consent of the Councilmembers for the
continued conveyance of information regarding annexation to Renton.
CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing.
Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 10/24/2005. Council concur.
10/24/2005
Appointment: Municipal Arts Mayor Keolker-Wheeler appointed Denise Bisio, 1301 W. Newton St., Seattle,
Commission 98119, to the Municipal Arts Commission for a three-year term expiring
12/31/2007. Refer to Community Services Committee.
November 7,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 383
Release of Easement: Robert City Clerk submitted request for partial release of easement by Robert West,
West,Lake WA Blvd N& 3904 Park Ave.N.,Renton,98056,for property located between Lake
Wells Ave N, RE-05-001 Washington Blvd. N. and Wells Ave.N. at N. 37th St. Refer to Utilities
Committee.
Lease: Renton Housing Community Services Department recommended approval of a five-year lease
Authority,Edlund Property with the Renton Housing Authority for a house on the City-owned Edlund
House property located at 17611 103rd Ave. SE. Refer to Finance Committee.
Plat: Elmhurst, Bremerton Ave Development Services Division recommended approval, with conditions, of the
NE,FP-05-090 Elmhurst Final Plat; 64 single-family lots on 9.6 acres located at 201 Bremerton
Ave.NE(FP-05-090). Council concur. (See page 385 for resolution.)
Development Services: Baxter Development Services Division recommended acceptance of a deed of
Meadow Short Plat, ROW dedication for additional right-of-way to include a cul-de-sac as part of the NE
Dedication, NE 18th Circle 18th Circle street extension from Duvall Ave. NE to fulfill a requirement of the
Baxter Meadow Short Plat(SHI'-03-088). Council concur.
Development Services: Urban Development Services Division recommended acceptance of a deed of
Craft Mixed Use dedication for additional right-of-way along Olympia Ave. NE and NE 4th St.
Development, ROW to fulfill a requirement of the Urban Craft Mixed Use Development(SA-03-
Dedication,Olympia Ave NE 035). Council concur.
Annexation: Perkins,SE 95th Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
Way& 128th Ave SE submitted 10%Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Perkins
Annexation,and recommended a public meeting be set on 11/21/2005 to
consider the petition; 15.1 acres located south of SE 95th Way and east of
128th Ave. SE(if extended). Council concur.
EDNSP: Neighborhood Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
Program Standards recommended adoption of standards for being an officially recognized
neighborhood in Renton's Neighborhood Program Refer to Communitv
Services Committee.
Human Resources: Police Human Resources and Risk Management Department recommended approval
Officers Guild Non- of the Renton Police Officers'Guild Non-Commissioned Employees and the
Commissioned Employees & Renton Firefighters Local 864 Battalion Chiefs labor agreements for 2006-
Firefighters Loca1864 2008. Council concur.
Battalion Chiefs Labor
Agreements
Utility: System Development Utility Systems Division recommended approval of the 2006 System
Charges,Annexation Fee Development Charges for water, wastewater,and surface water utilities,and
adoption of a$2,500 Annexation Fee to be implemented on 1/1/2006. Refer to
Utilities Committee.
WSDOT: I-405 to SR-169 Off- Utility Systems Division recommended concurrence with the Washington State
Ramp Alignment Department of Transportation regarding the proposed aligmnent of the
northbound I-405 to SR-169 off-ramp and future widening of I-405. Refer to
Utilities Committee and Community Services Committee.
Utility: Central Plateau Utility Systems Division recommended approval of a contract with Roth Hill
Interceptor Phase II,Roth Hill Engineering Partners,LLC, in the amount of$258,599 for design and
Engineering Partners permitting of the Central Plateau Interceptor Phase II project. Refer to Utilities
Committee.
November 7,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 384
Utility: WRIA 8 and WRIA 9 Utility Systems Division recommended approval of a one-year extension to the
Interlocal Agreement Water Resource Inventory Area 8(WRIA 8)interlocal agreement in the amount
Extensions,CAG-01-004& of$11,303, and to the WRIA 9 interlocal agreement in the amount of$10,397
CAG-01-005 for salmon conservation planning. Council concur. (See page 385 for
resolution.)
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCII.APPROVE THE
CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS Utilities Committee Chair Corman presented a report regarding the latecomer
Utilities Committee agreement request by LandTrust, Inc. (LA-OS-004). Dick Gilroy of LandTrust,
Latecomer Agreement: Inc. has withdrawn the request for a latecomer agreement for sewer installation
LandTrust,Sanitary Sewer along Hoquiam Ave. NE. Therefore, the Comxnittee recommended the removal
(Hoquiam Ave NE),LA-0S- of this item from the Committee's referral list. MOVED BY CORMAN,
004 SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE
REPORT. CARRIED.
Plannin�&Development Planning and Development Committee Chair Clawson presented a report
Committee regarding the evaluation of potential boundaries for the West Hill Potential
Comprehensive Plan: Annexation Area(PAA). The Committee recommended referring the issue of
Amendments,Inclusion of amending the Comprehensive Plan to include the West Hill in Renton's PAA to
West Hill in PAA the Committee of the Whole. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY
LAW, COUNCII,CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Planning: Residential Uses in Planning and Development Committee Chair Clawson presented a report
Commercial Arterial Zone regarding City Code changes for residential development in the Commercial
Arterial (CA)zone. The Committee recommended concurrence in the staff
recommendation to:
- • Amend the purpose of the CA zone under 4-2-020 to acknowledge that
limited residential use is appropriate when it is well integrated with
sunounding commercial development.
• Amend the use table at 4-2-060 and 4-2-070 to allow attached and semi-
attached housing in the CA zone as an administrative conditional use
subject to condition number 18.
• Amend note 18 of the Conditions Associated with Zoning Use Tables under
4-2-080 to prohibit garden style apartments,and set the conditions that
must be met to be eligible for residential development in the CA zone.
• Amend 4-2-080 to eliminate maps duplicated in 4-3-040.
� Amend the development standards for the CA zone at 4-3-120 to allow a
1,200-foot minimum lot size for attached residential plats,and change all
corridor references to "Business District."
• Amend 4-3-040 to create a Sunset, NE 4th,and Puget Business District
overlay, including development standards for commercial and residential
uses.
• Amend maps in 4-3-040 to show the corrected Business Districts.
� Insert Special Designation Criteria for residential uses in the NE 4th,
Sunset, and Puget Business Districts in 4-9-030.
MOVED BY CLAWSON,SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL CONCUR IN
THE COMMI'TTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
November 7,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 385
RESOLUTIONS AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption:
ORDINANCES
Resolution#3779 A resolution was read approving the Elmhurst Final Plat;approximately 9.6
Plat: Elmhurst,Bremerton Ave acres located in the vicinity of BremeRon Ave. NE,north of NE 2nd St.
NE,FP-05-090 MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCII.ADOPT
THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
Resolution#3780 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an
Utility: WRIA 8 and WRIA 9 extension of the interlocal agreements among participating jurisdictions with
Interlocal Agreement the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Resource Inventory
Extensions, CAG-01-004& Area(WRIA 9)and the Lake Washington/Cedar/Sammamish Watershed
CAG-01-005 Resource Inventory Area(WRIA 8). MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED
BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ.
CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS Council President Briere opened nominations for 2006 Council President and
Council: 2006 Council Council President Pro Tem. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW,
President Election(Corman)& COLINCIL ELECT COIJNCII.MAN CORMAN AS COLINCIL PRESIDENT
Council President Pro Tem FOR 2006 AND COUNCILWOMAN NELSON AS COIJNCIL PRESIDENT
Election (Nelson) PRO TEM FOR 2006. CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCII.ADJOURN THE
COUNCII,MEETING AND START COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AT
7:25 P.M. CARRIED. Time: 7:12 p.m.
�B'lc�,.,,r.r,^�/ �.�/2P.�`-irr��
Bonnie I. Walton, CMC,City Clerk
Recorder: Michele Neumann
November 7,2005
RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR ' '
-.. � Office of the City Clerk
COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
November 7, 2005
COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA
COLJNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP WED., 11/09 2006 Revenue Sources and Preliminary
1:00 p.m. Budget
*Conferencing Center*
COMIVIITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 11/14 Comprehensive Plan Briefing Regarding
(Briere) 5:00 p.m. West Hill;
2006 Budget Deliberations;
Briefing on Transportation Plan related to
Bceing Property Development
COMMLJNTTY SERVICES MON., 11/14 Denise Bisio Appointment to Municipal
(Nelson) 3:30 p.m. Arts Commission;
I-405 to SR-169 Ramp Alignment
Concurrence with WSDOT
FINANCE MON., 11/14 Vouchers;
(Persson) 4:00 p.m. Business License Fee Reporting Period
Changes
PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT
(Clawson)
PUBLIC SAFETY
(��')
TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION)
(Palmer)
LJTII.ITIES
(Corman)
NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings aze held in the Council Chambers unless otherwise noted. All other committee meetings are heid in the Council
Conference Room unless otherwise uoted.
;
� ' ���� � � �(�?`�� `
Exhibit C . ,
King County �
Department of Assessments SCOtt �Oble �
King County AdminisUation Bldg. Assessor
500 Fourth Avenue,Room 708
Seattle,WA 98104-2384
(20�296-S195 FAX(20�296-0595
Email:assessor.info�metmkc.gov
www.metrokc.gov/assessor/
ANNEXATION PETITION CERTIFICATION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition submitted May 23, 2005 to the
King County Department of Assessments by Don Erickson, Senior
Planner for the City of Renton, supporting the annexation to Renton
of the properties described as the Querin II Annexation, has been
examined, the property taxpayers, tax parcel numbers, and assessed
value of properties listed thereon carefully compared with the King
County tax roll records, and as a result of such examination, found to
be sufficient under the provisions of the New Section of Revised
Code of Washington, Section 35.13.002.
The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signature
on the petition is valid through comparison with any record of actual
signatures, nor that the signature was obtained or submitted in an
appropriate time frame, and this document does not certify such to
be the case.
Dated this 25� day of May, 2005
r ~� (�' h�
Scott Noble, King County Assessor
���1202M
Exhibit D
QUERIN ANNEXATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of
Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. King County, Washington, lying
northerly of the south line of the north 165 feet of the south half(1/2)thereof;
LESS the west 30 feet thereof.
� �
� �
�\�
C� �e
>
�
z ,
�
�
� Q
0
_ �
T St
9t
Querin Annexation ���°��y°�
TM�������
Exhibit F1: Proposed annexation boundary 0 400 800
1 Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning
�O` Alex Pietsch,Administrator
G.Del Rosario � . �Q o0
Bp.T 12 December2005 u
i ' � �'
i �
�
i ;
I
j _�.
� � ..b_
I •`l z _
� LAKE802EN
I ��� ' ' � V�t
I r � .
i �'
\�4«� {i
Y
` r..�
. _,y ,e� '_ MyC�kr'� a
i.AKE WASHI4G?ON _ '
I `, ,
I , �� � �
�
�
I
� �
\_
I ��t
�,
��
i`y.�'°� 0 t
;����:��;_ 4�t;
:;���
,� �;�.
� �'&a'"'_,'°�
��,
� ,��\ �" �� F�y a;
ff� `�-«
� � '�� 4��•��
,f"� � �►
� � f —.
l
�
��¢
1 tl
�
�
•
�� ��"t
v,��
� ���_.�.
a
� ��
� �
.�
� ��t�
R�='�,• `� � V� .
P
�' k
� .^ANTHERLAKE . ,^' ,
i�'1
�o-y
�,.
'� LAKE YOUNGS
Querin Annexation m`��`�� k� `a`�.�`w�„�
�o.�Y��� ����:�;�Y�:��.
�� ,��a���,%
Exhibit F2: Existing corporate limits 0 5000 10000
ti Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning
�O• Alex Pietsch,Administrator
G.Del Rosario
NZO 12 December 2005 1 . 6 0 0 0 0
, t .
I '
i
i
� — .
, �
� �
i � = AKE BORFN
-. 'ti, a`i,•
!" �
I � '-—
_�.., i
I �`
I f'" _
� � ,� My�«< .._
I � -_
ILAK't WASH?7GT023 ~�'�
i �"�� � ,_....,. �.
� �
I �� .e� ■ ,__
0
�'
� �
� ��
t
�. :
n;i z
I s' �°�� 8 - 4
�
�'�� n 1' E
� z
�-�t. 0
Riy��� ���,, NE 4th St SE 128 St
%'' q'�`y. NE kd
�� Nw�m "h4 � A w�Wa �
'ieF�" K
'ti� 5 2nd St .y
�n
��`...�.,.� ��
�� a -+c�
`�-.-e..�,� yp CO�'Wv¢� @ y'yv
�,a `s�y-_ '
�a Fa�'y SW 7th St
2 q
`� � �od W� ��
�, , SW Renton�Ilo �
A `y
� N i=x+a
a f �
Sq�r `� ���^ti.
h���'> 01vd � �'�.
} 1 Q,, '�.�,�-^�,.���,�j�
TukwBa kwy � B' 167
.�
Stronder Blva '
�
s � N — 515 fX
� 4 < a
a �
,t
e SW 34 h St
Y _
Z � �,Petrodisky Rd
� SW 41st St. �
S 180th v S I79 " .
p.�r�p�.. SW 4Jrd St $4 i`�i
f �. D
P
s a
j�
3`�
8t �h` .
,�+"w�'+nd'( �' .
'�� �Ilg _.__
�s:;.-z«.� — 24 -•—
� 3
I �q - � '_ ....�.
'�q PANTHEft I.AKE
Y
4 -_..e ,Nn`I
y��9
f.�"�t LAKE YOIRJGS
Q u e ri n An n exation �r�mant Na�,��.�Yo��.�����.�
to nn.er acwrac. w
bTh�h�muP b lar dhNMaormotbn ovo�abl�o�l tM AuG Nam.
Y WWose+m%
Exhibit F3: Major streets and major physical features 0 5000 10000
Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning
�O` Alex Pie[sch,Administrator
G.Del Rosario
P .t 12December2005 1 . 60000
I
I
� .
� ��
i Y.h
I �:�
r
' -LAKEBOREN
I /
I -- !
i _, r/
Ij
r
�. �'= ,r�-- , ��� _ �
�n
LAKE WASHihYTON STATION
j,�
, � _ _�_ 12
� �-�,� �
I _
� �
I n5 t ..`_ _ ... _ _.. '
R
i S�'ATION
o 't� 11
;�
��,
_�.
� sTaT1oN
�
���` +�,� 16
`z� � ��a poi��Y .,�
� 4� Q
n� LAKE
i 6�.
�� �
��`� � STATION � `�"`�
,, `� 13 � .� - x.
�_ %
,
��
�.� STATION
� 14
.
:�
F �
� ��_
� �—
V, v.�
� i
1 }
LAKF�ESIFtE
t$
I � ��
' SHwnY LAKF,
4
PANTHERLAKE '
p--
Querin Annexation �`�������°��Y�'�.��`�Y�
�� ,��a�����.�.��.
Exhibit F4a: Fire service area boundaries 0 5000 10000
Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning
�O« Alex Pietsch.Administrator
G.Del Rosano � . /0000
NT �ZDecember2005 b
i`, ' •
�'
I
I
I i* _� vw�,i
i � � �r
' �\
i � /r �,LAKEAOREN
�
^,� •'~' �I
�� ~ � � l
I ,�- f �
l��
I et I
��_� �
�'`� .e+�. C6's _
, \ M'�,,."� � +^<,.,..
r'-- —
LAP.E lVAB::iYGTGti -
�«.. ��_ e
`�'`� i
I
\ �w �
i i
I ; ` .-
� �
� ��
� �':
i �' i
I I
Q �� I
�
r� �----,
� �� �-
":,
�. �
`��_'� I
€
� ~`j v�_ ��. Foa,v '"°^-..,..�°"'�-,,� �
�' � ,ntce
' � � �
P /----
I �f � i' r� / —,��----�
�- �4,,,,,�, � I�:.; -�,
�:•
� �� "R.,.,�,`r�: �'^'"`t
i
��-.a..
I
��
r �'.i
I � •
i -- �
I � ��
i ��� � LZ * LAKE DESIRE
�'/?II __
I(
� �tg ." '"'__
�
I ,^R _.�
I F
� �r
� t � SHADYIAKF
Y
, PANTHERLAKE
�i f' ' _ ..._..
i,
Querin Annexation �`��`�.��`���Y�'��`�Y��
���.e..��,����:a.o��.�,.��.
m�.m�b r«ai.por o�..a��x
Exhibit F4b: Sewer service area boundaries 0 5000 10000
ti Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning
�O+ Alex Pietsch.Administrator
G.Del Rosario � . /0000
.r 12 December 2005 b
i � . ._._..
i '`��__Y. �
,t
I � - `
, .
' � .� LAKE BOREN
� �. COAL CREEK
� i� '` ATER 8� SEWER DIST.
. `.
i _J- �n:�vzao�
i yW `.
I �,r
r'-�.�
I l� �
. , .. �y��y�,/ ' .
�`�
ILP.KC W.4SHINGTGN -
� �— _ ..,__,_�� ._..._.. '�
I
\ �,
� BRYN MAWR - `� �--- ❑
� LAKERIDGE
; WATER & j V
i SEWER DISL � -
�
i mr,seo�
n'
I &'�
I SKYWAY WATER n�, TER DISTRICT 90
�
AND SEWER
� DISTRICT p ''�
pna�.,� 'i°
�, SEATTIE �:
� ATHt DBT. �qi� '�`�,.
`�,,�, WAT9t DBT. ��
I � (a�6 uul �`:�
�
` l"�"') c�`t.:��,.�_
I � �`��er '±
\aGk ''*4.. .e^�"'�� 'i
� ✓�ct Foc"Y '°-�..,s�:
I f:;
R�
I ��, � �s,..
I � �'ASMEfA/A�
I �-s l.��.`' �ie�nnr L
I , �\OOD A�OIIIOH ��'
i � WAl&COOYBtAIiVE
(2ssnwl
CITY ..
Of '� CEDAR RIVER
TUKWIL!{�'}x WATER AND
�." SEWER DIST.
(W-aw��' ' pssevol
i
•
I �( I _
v _.
`.�
4 �< ���5 CQ�K
I r W�,TER AND
SEWER DISTRICT
�uu�
I CITY
� � OF ,a� _ _
KENT �
� ,: ::_- F ��
�e.w-�oor
�, ';c
i
PANTHER LAKE ,
■ ■ Thw documnt i�a aphk totbn,not quamissd
Querin Annexation � �`���
�.� �.�a�a�� .,�;�:r��,�.
Thh m�h far displ y pwpora ml}
Exhibit F4c: Water service area boundaries 0 4500 9000
ti Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning
�O� Alex Pietsch,Admimsvator
G.Del Rosario 1 . G/�000
NT �2 December 2005 1 ,�`7
+ "�
i +f e__.
I f t'
I ' LAKEBOREN
I i .
i �
I /
I �.� �` '
� t
k � '``__
I,, _,..r_-.�. �, ,
I ' �` M�� � �```•- _
ILP.KE R'ASY.MGTON �\ � �
� � _�. 7 �
I � p � `
I 4Y �_ O �
I ``ti�` �
t
i
�� i
zu
I �.
� ti
'e.
I ���`�, �
�`��
l �q�� �
�� �_ � o�y ��
(/� �a F •
`'� � AKE
. ��
�, �. � � ` ��..
� �� � -.�-�:��:.�-.�--�,,.
I }i� � {�$�
��.
� �.
��
I ��
��
,
�: �
I ``
�
-
I y _ --
� �' ��J 1 �
Ui§,
�� �F ��� ,� LA ESfRE
�� � __ � �
�
. �
; r,' I - ,.-�I� _
i ��i� . -� --
I 1� `_
I ��` I � . _. -- .
i � SH LAKE
PANTHERLAKE
I ��� �. ��
i
� .
i '� LAKE YOIT'GS ,_._ .
Queri n An nexation Th`��'�� �k� `�`�.�`w�'.�
�:��Y�.�:r�����""',�w��Y�:.,�.
Thh m�6 far d'nqay pwpoxs mlK
Exhibit F5: King Co. UGA and Renton PAA 0 5000 10000
Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning
�O• Alex Pietsch,Admmistrator
G.Del Rosario
FNT� �2December2005 1 . 60000
i • ° } " �
/� ,
II _ "'
, ' LAKE&)REN
I `
i
I 8� --_
, +� p M°Y,-�'�-k H
I LAKE WASHitiG?ON � -
�4 V _�
I S
» � �
I ^
�w.
I AZ
I '
�.'
Q
I - `;..�.
I ' ��.
I `��_ t��`wT:
, ��,�
VuN' � o� �«.,•A'�' .`"'4
IR'� F .`x..
' --"-
� ``g n
i 4 �
I Y.�"A a 4
i � fl `•
�, �"�`,
� � ` ��'z$�x
�
i
� �
,��,
�=,�" _
i � `
" •
�
I� z? .�-
��
r'q ;
! �, 1�. ._'_---
,� 4�
, �
I �� �
�.�.�'
; Y�'� � _.
�
�
, :_,� F -_
IPANTHERLAKE � .
� LAKE 1'OlMGS
Querin Annexation Th�Ym�i����,�Yo�,��:���� -
Th��m;a:;�,a���:�o,�.�.�,�,.
�
Exhibit G: Proposed corporate limits 0 5000 10000
t Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Shategic Planning
�O• Alex Pie[sch.AdminisVator
G.Del Rosano
AN.rO 12 December 2005 1 . 60000
'\'� `. . - � . . . . . .1��:� ..\� �\' �\��'\���,�
, , . \ \ '. ' � . :\':`\ �',\ • �\` ,. .\' —!1 �
. ' '_ , �.'+� ' ' ' .�\� ,�� \"' \\.. •\. \y ■
\� \\� ',\�`.\ i\`\ �
. `
.�
�`.
�\
�--'.� \
\ :"\
. . . . '�� \\ �:\�`�
. � .�..\..
�
� i . ��� �`t,.
\ \ '�\.i :�\ .
J \ \ . `\�. .�'��..`�� \���'��,
`�` ��;`�� \:.
! �
� �
\ `.'\,:�.
, �\�'��� . ... .
\
� i .�..
__" �
__ JJJ 1 ' \
__ \ J `���`
, ,. � ,.. ,. ,`,' �'
��.
, ..- .. .,,,.
�
�\�
�.
i �
1 ) �.
�'`
� � ♦ . �
__ i . .._ �. � ,.,`� `��
+-�, �,
�,.;
..�
' ' __�___ V . '
, -----� � ..�,,,,. .:�` .:��' , . O
,
,
- --- `O
- -; ---� -
-- -- - \� \�
- -----
,
,
----• --
, � � ---�-- � _
� --+� - --_------ - -r---- �,:�`\\ �g�
- -- - �i ��� , � � �, ���
�
��
,
;; -._----- -----------------------\\ ir.. ` � s
. ,\ ; ,, �
,------;- _
\ �
, , -----, ------;-----;--------
�
a �
– r >_ , �,� � O
; �;' �: .� \ti; � 0 �
, .
�_:>._, ,_�_+-__ ' ; .
,
�._ ----•=-- � �
-- ---- , " `'
,. ,:
,
��.�
---------- ;' �;�, ;.: ;��
. . . -_ __"___'- __ `\�.C,�\ ",�„\'_ ?�\`,\`:` .\��'.��\�, >:�,\�`��\\�\ .�' �.�; `����' , i' ��
, . ' � �\ '��```\ \\ ��\�': .j\,: i�� �\�:�' �:`'' �� :':' �;��: �\��`�'�\` ° �
CI ��\ ..�,� _
�'
t�.
�..
�::Z:c;�;�:
�" �
�
�\ ���� �\'`'' \,v.,
.'\
:�\.`,��`\,,,
�� �'.�
\'C �'�'' �.` .\�.'�'��. .
:�.:,::�
�..
.� �:
.�..
�;;,, .
_ �\� ��
.�. <;:�; ��
_ ,.�:: .,�...� .�:; .�:
.��:;,: .\:�:�'������ ��. �:�
i - `:` \ � .�`
�'�;.., � ,�. .�:..
���.�•,� '�,.�,.. .�, �� \ ��:: �..
�y` '>\ ` c<.i \ .�\� \. �.� g
\� � .�, \.
\`:.
�� �:�
6
. . � \,
�
.� ��
��
�
�r�. .�� :C:.
.�
.,��
� `\.
� \'
� :\:., .� �
�� \ �� E
.'\} . `��` ���\��� � � �
�
����.,,.,., �.�,:
� �
\ �
�`\�
�
:�
�� �
. . .� � � `\;.
\
���:�� ��. ���, \\��
`\�
� ��� �
/�, `��•. ` :\��;�., i\\. :�o. .��\ � �
,. \�, �.,\� �.... �.�::`::""`_ , .�
�\'
� `\�
\�
�
�.
�\ �;�� .� .�:.
�
�
�e
,
� �
_ �,��:i
- - ._._. �
- - � '�`.
--,-- -- � _ ��� °� '
- , . :�.
- \
��: �.,�.. ';�;.
� '� :\o„_'`�::
f _ :'.�:.�.. �:t�. :�, \\,
. . : ��: \�� \�\\. �\,>..,\v.�... \.
�::;:: �
�.�•, . . :�\ ,y, `ti�\`. •,��j.
., . :\ .�.\.�' ;��`„
,.. .\' \��'
. � \ �\`;�,�;����. �.�, .a�� j�..� .\':.`� .'\' .
�\ ,\�\ `\•:� `\�..:;���`� .� �.,'
�' .�
\.,
`�.�� ..ti�'�
\, \`\;
\
:�.i �♦ �\� �;
��
�
\' �
`\,•C �\�� \\ � '\•
`�\. �\�`\.�
,\\\,, :,\�\:
�
�,\�:i:.� ��\� \ :�\.�::
\�� ��. `\.,�' `.� .\
,.C; '\ \ \
\ '\` ` `\.
<(. �. �' :�.� :.
;�. � �.
\
`� �
� '\� .>
;�,::>. �'�• �� ,� >�;:
�. �',
.\
�:� �.�;
., ��� � \
�,\ ,.�' .,\� \' � �\ '��. � \� � �� �.. ,�,
\\�`. �.;�.�r:\\ .� .�� .\\ �\ :�,;,'�.v::�.:' \�'�
`��;\\\.�.,\ � �`.� ..,
` .�.�. '�; � \ ' � � ��\ \�,\ '�\��\ �:..:;.. , .�•;:C �;���\� :\�. �t'�
�, �','\`���: � \ \'` \\\:�' \.``\ �\�� � ��.`\:.:�;�\`\ \\'J\ �\.
.. ., ..
� �, . ; �
� ,.... �.--�.-�t.
� � -- �\.
i 1 �\ \; .,• :. �.\��\`�;:,.\'..\��♦
______ \ . �\
______ � \�.�`•
1I1 � \:�\\�\ :,�:��� � \\'\`:+�:\,\�
� �\ �\ `�\\���� \� \
\ \ \
� \ ��\\� �.� ��,���` �
'\� \\� \\����'.��.:`.�;�����\�
'\'. :\:\.\ \ �\\\'��`��� �� \
� � � ,,':\ \� .\� \`,��.;.'.�','... �
; T I i � ;j \ �•,\\ '\`��\�.c\� �\,";;..:�
i �
i i \ � � ' ��\����\\ \,.\�\;
.,
i i i � ��\�: .\�,`':`'\,.�.
i � � \\ .��, ,�'��\\� �\ \ \�::.���.;\
I___I l____1______1i__ �\\\ ����\\�.�\�\\\\\` \� ,�.\`\\\ �
a�.`,,\ `�\ �� \��\``\� ��
���\\���\�.��\•'\�� ..\� \\ .�\'�.,\
� �� ����\�'�\�\\'�,'\\�'.\ .���� \ � �` �
---- \. � �� , ' .,� \\.;,\�,. ��:`:'::<..\'.
�����:���\�" ' �n,�. . ���`�.\` �\,\\ � �
4\� �'.�\�` �.�``�\,.��.;�� � \\\\�� � � � 0
\�' ���\,:�`:\��<:,::��i �..�� \��<.;>`:,\� �\ 'B
�� ,.��.:��� v'.. \�� ��'�: �`�..,;'� .�\ �\�
:�\: � \��.��: �\ ..��\vJ�'.;�,� ��'\\� ���� \\
---- �ti�� �\���\�C�• �\\� \ �..�..\`�;' \�;;�;�:<j� � C
— `� , .\��\� \� �\. � •.. ���.\ �,;,:;�
�\�����\\\ �� :\\� \'�'\`� \� ���, : �\ � �
\ � �\�`�\���\��\`�`�� ������\�\��, �:�.:,; � \ •�
--- \\ `�� �. .\� \�� ,�\;��� ��` \
\. � � \ � •�,.�;`��i�.,� \�'.,; ;:�� O Q on
,�\� ���.�.�����:U.��:.o..��.�,.;. • \ ■— ,c2
�;\\�':�C�\ .\C�\��V.�\::.<�\�,.�\. .\.\\\ .�..d N
____ \ �
� a"
' ' � inbo `� � �°
� S n_�__�__� u ,� � �
� ______� , � � � �
,
� H
�-- �
� '----' � J v�
� I �---+------ � �S
� � � I
� � �
� � � �
-----------� � , �
� � , ' � � N
� � � ; —
� � � a .�
, � , �
� , , ; �
-------,----------------------- , o
�
�"�'�..F—�+--i.� ;1- � N s
� W � �
� � � 'v� z
-----------� ��
�� � '
^, � ■ = o
�
�� � s
� � � °s
-� � ; � �
� g
.� '� � '� V Q `��
� .= „��
� �
------- . . v a�
----------------------- �� _ �
.��. 0.—�
� � vGC1
� � W 6CU='
�
� � X � o
� W .z
.
r
�ti`�Y o� CITY OF RENTON
�s
� � ♦ Mayor
�� O� Kathy Keolker
NT
April 27, 2006
Charles Booth, Chair
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
400 Yesler Way, Room 402
Seattle, WA 98104
SUBJECT: QUERIN II ANNEXATION PUBLIC HEARING, FILE NO. 2222
Deaz Mr. Booth:
The City of Renton hereby transmits its brief in support of the Querin II Annexation and
specificatly, its request for the expansion of the boundaries of this annexation. RCW
36.93.150 gives the Board the authority to expand an annexation area's boundaries"as it
deems necessary to best carry out the intent of the chapter." For the various reasons set
forth in this brief, the City believes expansion of the origina17.18-acre annexation will
result in more logical boundaries for this annexation as well as facilitate the earlier
provision of urban services to area residents. Also, Honey Creek, an environmentally
sensitive stream with wetlands, runs through the center of the proposed 16.74-acre
expansion area and would benefit by being in the City.
In addition to these reasons, the City proposes expansion due to the fact that the proposed
area to be included is already surrounded by the City on three of its four sides and abuts
NE Sunset Boulevard, a major east-west arterial, and logical boundary.
.
The City of Renton is hopeful that the Board, after careful consideration, will agree with
it that the Querin II Annexation would benefit by being expanded to include the
�unincorporated 16.74-acre area immediately to its north.
If the Board or staff has questions regarding this submittal, please contact Don Erickson
in our Economic Development,Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning Department. Mr.
Erickson can be reached at 425-430-6581. i
Sincerely,
� - �'��-��'----
Kathy Keolker, Mayor
Attachment
cc: Jay Covington
Alex Pietsch
Don Erickson
1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 -(425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 R E N T O N
AHEAD OF THE CURVE
�rti��..�..o�.-...a��..�cnoi,n...,..�.,.�b.;�i znoi...,��,-.,.,���..,o�
t
REPORT TO
THE WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD
FOR KING COUNTY
IN THE MATTER OF TAE CITY OF RENTON'S
QUERIN II ANNEXATION
Boundary Review Board File No. 2222
May 16,2006 Public Hearing
I. BACKGROUND
The Renton City Council approved a 60%Direct Petition to annex for this annexation on
November 7,2005 and authorized the City Administration to forward the Notice of Intent
Package to the Board. The Renton City Council,also at that time authorized the City
Administration to request that the Boundary Review Board invoke its jurisdiction in order to
review and hear arguments in favor of expanding the subject annexation to the north and
northwest to include a 16.74-acre peninsula of unincorporated King County, surrounded by the
City on more than 50%percent of its perimeter. Because of another annexation under
consideration to the east,there is a potential this peninsula could be come an island in the future if
it is not annexed now as part of the Querin II Annexation.
II. COMMUNITY BACKGROUND AND ANNEXATION PROPOSAL
The Querin II annexation is located within Renton's Potential Annexation Area and abuts Renton
on its westem and southern boundary and is bordered by Hoquiam Avenue NE(142"�Avenue
SE)on the west,NE 13`''Street,on the south,and 144`h Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. It is
located at the base of an unincorporated peninsula of land between 141 S`Avenue SE, if extended
on the west and 144th Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. The area is bounded on the north by
the south side of NE Sunset Boulevard.
Annexation in this and other unincorporated areas of Renton's eastern Potential Annexation Area
is primarily driven by development being approved by King County. The resulting development
patterns are determined by smaller scale annexations in the five to twenty acre size,often with
discontinuous streets and cul-de-sacs. Because of this,the resulting municipal boundary in many
cases is convoluted,resulting in irregular shaped areas that are difficult to serve. With the City
closing in on these remnant areas,they present service and other challenges to both the City and
the County. The City, for example,receives complaints on a regular basis about the poor surface
condition of 142nd Avenue SE, in this unincorporated area. As noted above,the proposed Aster
Park Annexation to the east, if approved would virtually cut this remaining peninsula off from
other unincorporated pockets of land that remain as Renton annexes east to the Urban Growth
Boundary along the west side of 148`�'Avenue SE. If the Aster Park Annexation to the east were
successful,the City would surround this unincorporated island on 100%of its perimeter.
III. CONSISTENCY WITH STATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT AND
COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES
State law(RCW 36.93.157) stipulates that Boundary Review Board decisions must be consistent
with three sections of the state's Growth Management Act(GMA): planning goals, urban growth
areas, and countywide planning policies. The City believes that the Querin II Annexation as
currently configured does not fully meet the intent of the Countywide Planning Policies.
Querin II Annexation
BRB File No.2222
1
a. Planning Goals: Both the City and the County have adopted comprehensive land
use plans as required by GMA. Each of these plans has been determined to be
consistent with the GMA by the state Department of Community,Trade, and
Economic Development. These plans support the Act's various goals including
those related to planning for urban growth,reducing urban sprawl,meeting
diverse housing needs,as well as addressing transportation, open space,and
recreation. Renton's 2004 Mandated GMA Comprehensive Plan is also
consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies of King County.
b. Urban Growth Areas: The City of Renton has,through the countywide planning
process, adopted a Potential Annexation Area(PAA),which includes the subject
area as well as areas to the south and east as far as 148�'Avenue South and the
much larger East Renton Plateau,mostly south of 128`h Avenue SE and east of
150�'Avenue SE east to 184`f'Avenue SE. A portion of Renton's PAA on the
south side of the Cedar River and east of 128'�'Avenue SE has been proposed for
incorporation as the city of Fairwood. It is the City's intent to provide urban
levels of services and development,through annexation, to those portions of its
PAA that do not incorporate.
c. Countvwide Planning Policies: King County,through the ratification of its cities,
adopted its Countywide Planning Policies,Phase II(CPP), in 1994. These were
updated in August 2000. The CPPs are part of a hierarchy of directive and
substantive policy. As directive policy,the CPPs guide the comprehensive plans
of cities and counties, which in tum provide substantive direction regarding the
content and exercise of local land use regulations. One of the primary aims of
the CPPs is to `facilitate the transformation of local governance in the urban
growth area so that urban governmental services are provided by cities and rural
and regional services are provided by counties."[Central Puget Sound Hearings
Board, Snoqualmie,2304c,FDO]. Besides defining service provision
responsibility,the CPPs also stipulate that development must be directed to urban
areas,thereby reducing the opportunity for sprawl to occur. Some of the more
relevant CPPs include:
Policv LU-29 states that all jurisdictions shall develop growth phasing
plans consistent with applicable capital facilities plans to maintain an
Urban Area served with adequate public facilities and services to meet at
least the six-year intermediate household and employment target ranges,
consistent with LU-67 and LU-68.
Policv FW-13 states that cities are the appropriate provider of local urban
services to Urban Areas, either directly or by contract. Counties are the
appropriate provider of most countywide services.
Policy LU-32 states that a city may annex territory only within its
designated PAA. All cities are required to phase annexations to coincide
with the ability of the city to coordinate the provision of a full range of
urban services.
Policv LU-33 states that land within a city's PAA shall be developed
according to that city's and King County's growth phasing plans.
Querin II Annexation
BRB File No. 2222
2
Undeveloped lands adjacent to that city should be annexed at the time
development is proposed to receive a full range of urban services.
Renton notes that both the annexation area,as well as the adjacent unincorporated area to its
north and northwest,are within its PAA and undergoing development pressure. Renton is the
designated sewer service provider and property owners are inquiring as to how soon sewer
service will be available. Water service is currently provided through Water District No. 90,and
likely will remain so for the foreseeable future. Renton currently provides fire suppression and
prevention services under contract through Fire District No. 25 to the existing and proposed
expansion area. It is prepared to provide a full array of urban services including local
governance, library and police services, courts,jails,detective services, street maintenance,
human services,recreation and parks services,and planning and transportation services to the
axea. Renton is already providing these urban services to city residents adjacent to the annexation
area and the unincorporated peninsula,and can,unlike King County,easily extend these services
to this area. Under Renton's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation this area is
classified as Residential Single Family(RS)and would support R-8 zoning, with a maximum
density of eight units per net acre.
Although annexation is anticipated to continue incrementally in this area, including the
unincorporated peninsula to the north and northeast now,with the Querin II Annexation,would
encourage more orderly and coordinated development while removing an unincorporated
peninsula that undoubtedly is difficult for the County to serve, especially as its services continue
to decline due to budget constraints. It is also likely residents would benefit from reduced taxes
at the same time they receive improved urban services. The original 7.18-acre proposal fails to
address the needs of the larger surrounding community,which can be more efficiently met
through an expanded annexation that would include the unincorporated peninsula to its north and
northwest.
IV. CONSISTENCY WITH BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FACTORS AND
OBJECTIVES
In addition to reviewing an annexation for consistency with the state Growth Management Act,
Countywide Planning Policies,the King County Comprehensive Plan, and Renton's
Comprehensive Plan,the Boundary Review Board must also evaluate it based upon the nine
objectives set forth in RCW 36.93.180. In doing so the BRB is allowed to consider a host of
factors(RCW 36.93.170)including but not limited to land use,population,availability of
municipal services,cost of local services,economics, and development regulations. These nine
objectives are listed below along with along with findings to determine whether an objective is
met,or, in some cases, relevant. Staff s analysis includes conclusions based upon the current
annexation as well as an expanded annexation including the unincorporated peninsula to the
north.
Objectives:
1. Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities.
The proposed 7.18-acre annexation when combined with the adjacent Aster Park
Annexation to its east would exacerbate the existing situation since it would create a
pocket of unincorporated King County along the south side of NE Sunset Boulevard with
Querin II Annexation
BRB File No. 2222
3
an environmentally sensitive stream(Honey Creek)and associated wetland running
through it.
By expanding this annexation to include the unincorporated peninsula to the north and
northwest,more consistency in terms of development type and layout would result.
Renton's Comprehensive Plan shows this area as both Residential Sing(e Family(RS)on
the west side of 142°d Avenue SE and Residential Low Density(RLD)on the east site.
As a result,R-8 zoning most likely would be applied concurrently with annexation in the
RS portion and R-4 zoning most likely would be applied concurrently with annexation.
King County's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map shows this unincorporated pocket as
Urban Residential,Medium, 4-12 du/ac. Current County zoning is R-4,which can be
bonused up to six units per gross acre,which is approximately equal to Renton's R-8, at
eight units per net acre. Clearly, future development under Renton's R-4 zoning would
be more consistent with the area's existing lower density/larger lot character than
development under the County's R-4 zoning.
2. Use of phvsical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water,highways,
and land contours.
The proposed annexation relies on property lines and street right-of-ways for its
boundaries. The inclusion of the unincorporated peninsula would result in both a more
reasonable municipal boundary and service area.
3. Creation and preservation of lo�ical service areas.
The proposed annexation by itself does little to create or preserve logical service districts
in the area. Other than for water and schools there currently are no logical service areas
here. King County notes that the costs of servicing the urban unincorporated areas are
not necessarily going down with annexation because of the increased inefficiencies of
serving these areas in the interim. They also point out that because of voter approved
initiatives;their ability to raise taxes to provide the same level of services has been
seriously jeopardized.
Cities,unlike the county,have been afforded by the state legislature taxing authority for
both business and occupations tax, and utility tax,to support the provision of local urban
services. As a consequence, cities are better able to provide a broad array of services
synonymous with urban living. This is one of the main reasons both the Growth
Management Act and the Countywide Planning Policies designate cites as the logical
provider of urban services.
The annexation site and surrounding area,as noted above, are within Renton's designated
PAA,and anticipated to be annexed into the City in the foreseeable future. If the larger
16.74-acre unincorporated area to the north/northwest is not included at this time,the
existing inefficiencies of servicing this unincorporated area will continue.
4. Prevention of abnormallv irregular boundaries.
This annexation does not prevent abnormal or irregular boundaries. Because most
annexations are incremental within a city's PAA, and are driven by development
pressures including the availability of urban services such as sewer, the resulting
municipal boundaries often are going to be irregular, at least on an interim basis. This,
Querin II Annexation
BRB File No.2222
4
however, is usually only temporary until the city's PAA is annexed or incorporated. Any
irregularities thereafter would be dictated by the boundaries of the UGB or those of
adjacent cities.
5. Discoura�ement of multiple incorporations.
This objective is not relevant in this case. The annexation proponents are not considering
incorporation nor is there a proposed or likely incorporation in the area that they could
join.
6. Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts.
This objective is not relevant in this case. There are no inactive special districts in either
the proposed annexation area or the unincorporated peninsula to its north and east.
7. Adjustment of impractical boundaries.
The annexation as proposed does not adjust or normalized impractical boundaries. If
anything, it could facilitate the development of an unincorporated island if its boundaries
are not expanded. The combination of the Querin II Annexation and another proposed
annexation(Aster Park Annexation),to the east,could potentially create an
unincorporated island immediately north of this annexation. The City believes that the
best way to adjust the boundaries in this area would be to expand the Querin II
Annexation to include the 16.74-acre unincorporated peninsula to its north and northwest
at this time. The resulting boundary would be more logical and result in more efficient
service for area residents.
8. Incorporation of cities or towns or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated
areas, which are urban in character.
The proposed annexation area as well as the 16.74-acre unincorporated peninsula to its
north and northwest is located within the County's designated urban growth area. The
City is requesting that the Boundary Review Board expand the proposed 7.18-acre
annexation to include the unincorporated peninsula to the north and northwest, at this
time, for a total annexation area of approximately 23.92-acres.
9. Protection of agricultural and urban lands.
This objective is not applicable in this case. The subject annexation site and the
surrounding peninsula of unincorporated land are designated"urban"on the County and
City's comprehensive plan land use maps. There are no designated agricultural lands
within the subject area.
In summary, the proposed Querin II Annexation does not appear to meet objectives 1-4 and 7.
However, with the inclusion of the 16.74-acre unincorporated peninsula of land to its north and
northwest, south of NE Sunset Blvd,the resulting enlarged annexation area would better meet the
Board's objectives, while facilitating future annexations to the east,along the UGB.
Querin II Annexation
BRB File No.2222
5
V. CONCLUSION
The City of Renton is ready to assume this area and can provide a high level of urban services to
its residents. The proposed 7.18-acre annexation,however,will do little to expedite the
annexation of residual unincorporated peninsula to its north/northwest. This latter area is not
efficiently and levels of service are expected to decline as the County shifts its focus from serving
unincorporated areas within the UGB to the rural areas outside of it. Residual pockets of
unincorporated land, such as the 16.74 acres north of the Querin II Annexation will be more
difficult for public and emergency responders to find. Street numbering,during the interim will
also be confusing as motorists pass through the City, with its four digit house numbers and NE
street designation,to come upon a block or two of unincorporated King County with five digit
house numbers and SE street designations,before coning back into the City again.
The cost of servicing these residual pockets of unincorporated land until they eventually annex is
obviously higher for the county than if they were coterminous to larger unincorporated areas that
are intended to remain unincorporated for years to come. The subject area,however, is
designated"urban"and both the Growth Management Act and the Countywide Planning Policies
designate cities, such as Renton,as the logical providers of urban services to these areas.
Expanding the Querin II Annexation now,to include the unincorporated peninsula to its
north/northwest would result in a more efficient service areas for both the County and the City,
thereby reducing costs to both. It also appears that annexation to Renton would reduce the
amount of taxes and service fees paid by residents within the enlarged annexation area.
Arguments supporting an enlarged annexation include:
1. The City's Potential Annexation Area designation represents the future intention of the
city,which includes this area as well as areas east to the Urban Growth Area boundary.
Since incorporation cannot occur within this portion of Renton's PAA(the proposed
Briarwood incorporation failed a number of yeazs ago and subsequently much of that area
has already been annexed),this whole area will eventually come into the City. Confusion
and uncertainty for residents within this portion of Renton's PAA would be reduced the
sooner this areas is brought into the City.
2. Expanding the Querin II Annexation's boundaries to include the unincorporated property
to the north and northwest up to the south side of NE Sunset Boulevard would result in a
more reasonable municipal boundary while reducing confusion regarding service
responsibilities,public notifications,calls for emergency response,and the like.
3. Whereas subsequent annexations are anticipated in the area,particularly in response to
the reduction in County services, such annexations are citizen initiated, incremental, and
often do not represent the most logical service areas or municipal boundaries. In fact,
there currently is a proposed annexation to the northeast of the subject site.
4. Expansion will also facilitate a proposed annexation to the east and facilitate the City's
annexation a few hundred feet to the east to the Urban Growth Boundary. Using the
Board's authority to expedite the transference of urban unincorporated areas to urban
incorporated areas appears to provide a more efficient way to realize adopted regional
planning goals and create more efficient service areas.
5. Consistent with GMA and CPP policy, cities are the logical provider of urban services
and counties are the logical provider of regional and local services within rural areas.
Querin II Annexation
BRB File No. 2222
6
6. The City of Renton has planned for and is able,at this time, to provide a full complement
of urban services for both the current annexation proposal as well as the unincorporated
area to its north and northwest. Renton is the designated sewer service provider for this
area and sewer is currently available in the nearby NE Sunset Boulevard right-of-way,to
the north. Renton is the designated water service provider for the area west of 142"d
Avenue SE.
7. Incremental annexation,with large delays between annexations,can set the stage for
different development standards being applied within the same community, leading to
very different development patterns and infrastructure such as streets and utility fixtures.
VI REQUEST
State law(RCW 36.93.160)authorizes the Boundary Review Board to: approve the annexation
proposal as submitted, deny the annexation proposal as submitted,or modify the annexation
proposal by adding or deleting territory and approving as modified. The City of Renton
respectfully puts forward the following request for Board consideration:
The City of Renton requests that the Boundary Review Board modify the Querin II
Annexation as submitted to include the 16.73-acre unincorporated area immediately to its
north and northeast, as depicted in Exhibit 1 and described in Eachibit 2,attached.
Querin II Annexation
BRB File No.2222
7
�
Exhibit 1 .
d
>
2
.�
�
S 4th St,
� ' t �
�
�
a� ; p v� v
'^' a�
o �C
� ��
� � O
� '� a
� � .�� �
e �
� w 1 c�k w �: �.
¢ oney � ,�:;; Se � �SSpq
�j�
Su�s � � ,, Q,
Q
�
> z �
�
�
o � E
� � Q
o �
� _ � o �
T St �,
�
(� t
NEJ 9t
>
Q
s
- o
� �
w
>
0
�
\ "�
�
N This document is a yaphic ro�resentotbn,not guoronteed
E 6 th S lo aurve�y accurocy, t ded tor city pu a�osee only and
baaed o the beat information owilable at the date ehown.
This mop is for disploy Durposes only.
Querin II Annexation o goo 1600
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
1 : 9600
�ti�Y o,,{, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning - - RelltOtl City LImItS
� � � Alex Pietsch,Administrator � Original Annexation Area
G.Del Rosario
"��Nzo'� 18 January 2006 Proposed Annexation Area
�
E�iibit 2 ,
QUERIN II ANNEXATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quazter of the Northeast quarter of
Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington,lying
northerly of the south line of the north 165 feet of the south half(1/2) thereof;
LESS the west 30 feet thereof.
TOGETHER WITH that portion of the Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of
Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying
southwesterly, southerly and southwesterly of the existing City Limits of Renton as
annexed by Ordinance No. 4092, and lying easterly, southerly and easterly of the existing
City Limits of�enton as annexed by Ordinance No. 4026.
r
Annexa�ion Review Form
[ J 10% Notice of Intent [X j 60%Annexation Petition
TO: Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM: Economic Development, Neighbofioods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT: Proposed Querin Annexation - Expanded
LOCATION: The Querin II annexation abuts Renton on its western and southem boundary
and is bordered by Hoquiam Avenue NE (142nd Avenue SE)on the west, NE 13"'Street, on the
south, and 144"'Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. It is located at the base of an
unincorporated peninsula of land between 141�`Avenue SE, if extended on the west and 144th
Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. The area is bounded on the north by fhe south side of NE
Sunset Boulevard.
Date Circulated: June 16. 2006 Comments Due: June 26. 2006
General lnformation
Area : Approximately 24 acres.
Street length : 600 linear feet(existing); est. 18,650'at
buildout
Assessed Value (taxable) : $4,602,000 (existing development)
Estimated Population : 39
Current Uses
Residential : 17 single family units
Commercial .
Industrial :
Public :
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Singte Family (8 du/net ac) and
Residential Low Density(4 du/net ac)
Future Uses: : +74 Detached single-family residential housing
Future Po ulation • 170 ersons 74 housin units .
Reviewing Department/Division: • /
1. Does the expanded annexation represent any un que or significant problems for your
department/division? ����/������ j� /ZG/ `I����'�i��
�Q' `j �
f Y�t ��--
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area?
!'j,� �
(Over)
�
a
3. Does this proposed expanded annexation represent a logical extension of senrices provided
by your department/division?
�
4. Can you provide a dollar figure estimate of the cost to provide service to this area at current
development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify
any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
��
General recommendation and comments:
� �����
Signature: i�<��J�� Date: �
�
*,
QUERIN ANNEXATION -EXPANDED FISCAL ANALYSIS SHEET
Units Po ulation AV
Existin dev. 17 39 $4,602,000
Fuli dev. 74 170 $35,010,000
Assumptions: 2.3 persons/househoid
$270,706 AV/existing parcel
$450,000 AV/new SF home
:t��vaitit��s:�:��:::::`��:: Total revenues
...................
................... ..:......:.::...........:...... ..
Existin Full Rate Existing::;;;:::?:;:�2��96::��
Re ular le $14,489 $110,227 3.14843 Full::��:;�:�;$�4�;�:#�'
Excess le $362 $2,752 0.07861
State shared revenues
Rate er ca Existin Full
Li uor tax $3.93 $153.27 $668.10
Li uor Board rofits $7.41 $288.99 $1,259.70
Gas tax-unrestricted $23.69 $923.91 $4,027.30
MVET $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Cam er excise $0.75 $29.25 $127.50
Criminal 'ustice $0.22 $8.58 $37.40
Total $1,404.00 $6,120.00
Miscellaneous revenues
Rate Existin Full
Real estate excise* $48.57 $1,894.23 $8,256.90
Utili tax"* $133.20 $2,264.40 $9,856.80
Surface Water Utilit $199.80 $3,530.00
Fines&forfeits* $17.53 $683.67 $2,980.10
Total $5,042.10 $24,623.80
" Per capita
** Per housing unit-based on$2,220 annual utility billing @ 6%tax rate
;���s:���'���::::;::::�:::'::: Total ongoing costs
Per ca ita Existin Full Existing:�:::::::;::�2:�;�1:�;9��'
Contracted Services Full:s:`���'��$1s'(�i?a:7�r${}:
....................
_.
Alcohol $0.19 $7.41 $32.30
Public Defender $4.68 $182.52 $795.60
Jail $8.56 $333.84 $1,455.20
Subtotal $523.77 $2,283.10
Court/te al/admin. $66.92 $2,609.88 $11,376.40
Parks maintenance` $14.90 $581.10 $2,533.00
Police $276.89 $10,798.71 $47,071.30
Surface Water O &M $3,808.00 $8,539.00
Road maintenance`* N/A $438.00 $3,907
Fire"** $1.25 $5,752.50 $43,762.50
Total $24,511.96 $119,471.80
*See Sheet Parks FIA
**See Sheet Roads FIA
""Rate per$1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) Net fiscal impact
Existin ��������������« � ,���::(�
9::€;�:�;:::::::�'�
Full::::::::���:� ���.'��St}>67:
....... ... ........
�atte►firri��Gtists::�Parks acquisition &development(from Sheet Parks FIA): $40,498
Other one-time costs:
Total one-time costs: :�:::::::;:;:$4#1;4:�8:4#:
Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo
« �
Annexation Review Form
[ ] 10% Notice of Intent [ X ] 60% Annexation Petition
TO: Building Surface Water Utility ✓
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM: Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT: Proposed Querin Annexation - Expanded
LOCATION: The Querin II annexation abuts Renton on its western and southern boundary
and is bordered by Hoquiam Avenue NE (142nd Avenue SE) on the west, NE 13th Street, on the
south, and 144th Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. It is located at the base of an
unincorporated peninsula of land between 141St Avenue SE, if extended on the west and 144th
Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. The area is bounded on the north by the south side of NE
Sunset Boulevard.
Date Circulated: June 16, 2006 Comments Due: June 26, 2006
General Information
Area : Approximately 24 acres.
Street length : 600 linear feet (existing); est. 18,650' at
buildout
Assessed Value (taxable) : $4,602,000 (existing development)
Estimated Population : 39
Current Uses
Residential : 17 single family units
Commercial :
Industrial :
Public :
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family (8 du/net ac) and
Residential Low Density (4 du/net ac)
Future Uses: : +74 Detached single-family residential housing
Future Po ulation � 170 ersons 74 housin units).
Reviewing Department/Division: SURFACE WATER UTILITY
Does the expanded annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
department/division?
The proposed Querin Annexation is located in the Honey Creek sub-basin of the May Creek basin.
The upper most reach of Honey Creek flows through the eastern part of the site. Erosion and flooding is
an existing problem for the Honey Creek sub-basin*. King County Wetland 6, a sensitive area, is located
.-----------,
within the propert� This wetland has suffered some degradation due o �e roa construction, illegal
- - - -
dumping and buffer reduction. Honey Creek, wifl�its associated wetlands and its forested buffers needs
-_ - �- - _>
to b�o.tected--i�-ae-eflrd�rree�vttir��eset►siti�e-a�ea�e�ulata�sxegaxtliug_�uetlat�_ds and stream buff�er_
standards.
(Over)
� t
We recommend requiring use of the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual Conservation
Flow Control Standard(level 2) and water quality treatment standards be required for any new
development within the proposed annexation area, or the City adopted standard at the time of
development, if it is a higher standard that will better control the quantity and quality of storm water
runoff from new construction within the proposed annexation area. A wetland report should be required
for any new development application within the proposed annexation.
*See May creek Conditions Report, Aug. 1995, p.9-40, 9-41.
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area?
Rlmoff from SE 112t�' Place flows onto the annexation area east of Honey Creek, from an outfall
pipe onto a 33% slope, which is an erosion hazard. No other drainage structures exist on-site. The
eastern half of the site is moderately sloped on botl� sides of Honey Creek.
Downstream, Wetland 6 is sensitive to and_has_seen_so�ne degradation due to the existing
developments surroundin�it. Flooding within tl�e annexation area, along with erosion, fisli habita�and
passage proble�ms, and poor water quality are other deficiencies in the Honey Creek sub-basin. Portions
of Honey Creek downstream of the proposed a�mexation area are underground in pipes. --'
3. Does this proposed expanded annexation represent a logical extension of services provided
by your department/division?
The proposed anneYation represents a lo�ical extension of surface water utilit�_services. Future
storm drains wou �sc�arge to Honey Creek. -'
4. Can you provide a dollar figure estimate of the cost to provide service to this area at current
development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify
any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
When the proposed annexation area is developed additional public storm systems will be
constructed that will increase the Surface Water Utility maintenance needs. This will incrementally
require additional resources for maintenance of infrastructure from this anne�ation, other anne�ations
and new development within eYistivg City limits. At some point, additional resources will be needed for
maintenance due to new develop�nent and annexations.
Based on the current annual o�eration an�tnaintenance cost_of$238_per acre for t1�whole_c�
the operation a»d mainte�iance for the 24_acre Querin_annexation area is estimated to be about $5,712 per
�e T iis includes cost for both the maintenance and engineering personnel in the Surface Water y
Utility. Existing revenue from the l 7 single-family residential homes within the eYpanded annesation
area is estimated to be approxiinately$1,132 per year. Future revenue based upon the anticipated 74
detached single-family homes that could be constructed within the proposed annexation area is estimated
__ ---- _ _ - ------------ -
to be $4,928 ep r year• The Surface Water Utility capital improvements within the proposed annexation
area would need to be evaluated.
General recommendation and comments:
The annexation area drains to Honey Creek. Downstream is a class-2 wetland that is valuable for
wildlife habitat, provides some peak flow attenuation, and improves water quality. Honey ree
H:\File Sys\SWA - Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 26-Annexations\Querin\Querin Annex 60%-
Expanded REVUFORM.doc\RStp
. �
contains trout and salmonids and drains into May Creek, which also supports fish.
Honey Creek is susceptible to erosion and flooding, which is in fact occurring in the present state. The
erosion is impacting fish habitat and is caused by increased runoff due to urbanization in the Honey
Creek sub-basin. Water quality in the basin is also degraded. Future progra�ns and projects to address
these proble�ns �nay be required.
� Future development should be held to high environmental protection standards guided by the May Creek i
�Basin Plan. Future development in the proposed annexation area should be required to comply with the �
2005 KCSWDM standards to provide Conservation Flow Control Standar eveT 2) and water quality ;
� treatin r�Yc�'m wate�.�utto tricter standards if required by the i y a �e ime of development. ��,
Signatur : � Date: �� � �
cc: Lys Hornsb��. Utility Systems Director
Rich Marshall,Maintenance Manager
.lennifer Henning.Development Services Principal Planner
Gary Fink, Surface Water Utility Engineer
H:\File Sys\SWA- Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 26-Annexations\Querin\Querin Annex 60%-
Expanded REVUFORM.doc\RStp
. . ��C��VE�
�uN � � ?oas
Annexation Review Form CiTY OF FiENTOi��
11Tti!TY SYS?�=^•�4�
[ ) 10% Notice of Intent [X J 60% Annexation Petition
TO: Building rfaee er Utility
Fire ater Utility +�
Parks as tility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM: Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT: Proposed Querin Annexation - Expanded
LOCATION: The Querin II annexation abuts Renton on its western and southern boundary
and is bordered by Hoquiam Avenue NE (142"�Avenue SE) on the west, NE 13�' Street, on the
south, and 144"'Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. It is located at the base of an
unincorporated peninsula of land between 141�`Avenue SE, if extended on the west and 144th
Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. The area is bounded on the north by the south side of N�
Sunset Boulevard.
Date Circulated: June 16, 2006 Comments Due: June 26. 2006
General Information
Area : Approximately 24 acres.
Street length : 600 linear feet(existing); esf. 18,650' at
buildout
Assessed Value (taxable) : $4,602,000 (existing development)
Estimated Population : 39
Current Uses
Residential : 17 sing�e family units
Commercial :
Industrial :
Public :
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family (8 du/net ac) and
Residential Low Density(4 du/net ac)
Future Uses: : +74 Detached single-family residential housing
Future Po ulation • 170 ersons 74 housin units .
Reviewing Department/Division:
1. Does the expanded annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
department/division?
�'�22 qd�ad�ud• �(c�h'e�J ��'e.� 6/Z3�°G
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area?
(Over)
3. Does this proposed expanded annexation represent a logical extension of services provided
by your department/division?
4. Can you provide a dolla�figure estimate of the cost to provide service to this area at current
development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify
any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
General recommendation and comments:
Signature: Date:
Attachment to Annexation Review Form
For Proposed Querin Annexation—Expanded—60% Annexation Petition
Reviewing Department: Water LTtility Engineering
by Abdoul Gafour (x7210)
June 23,2006
1. Does the expanded annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
dep artment/division?
No, the portion of the proposed annexation lying east of 142°d Avenue SE is within the water service area
of King County Water District No. 90(WD#90).
The portion of the annexation lying west of 142°d Avenue SE is within the City of Renton's�vater service
area.
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the
area?
No-The applicants shall contact Water District 90 and request a certificate of water availability from the
District prior to any development within the portion of the annexation area that is within WD#90 service
area.
3. Does this proposed expanded annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
Yes, although only the portion of the proposed annexation, lying west of 142"�Avenue SE, is within the
water service area of the City of Renton.
4. Can you provide a dollar figure or estimate for the cost to provide services to this area at current
development and at buildout(maintaining existing,city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify
any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
Developer's extensions of water mains for properties east of 142"d Ave SE will be required to provide
water for fire protection and for domestic use for development within the annexation area. The applicant
shall obtain a certificate of water availability from KCWD#90.
New development or redevelopment of properties west of 142"d Avenue SE shall connect to Renton's
water system. New water main extension will be required along 142"d Ave SE, south of NE Sunset Blvd.
General recommendation and comments:
Applicants shall contact KCWD#90 and obtain water availability certificate prior to any development within
annexation area. Please notify WD#90 regarding proposed annexation.
KCWD#90, 15606 SE 128"' St, Renton, WA 98059,Attn: Tom Hoffman—Manager-425-255-9600
Signature: C� �%1� Date: June 23,2006
Abdoul Gafour
Water Utility Supervisor
H:\File Sys\WTR-Drinking Water Utility\WTR-03-Correspondence\Annexation-review\Querin II-annexation-60%.062306.doc\AG
�: � ------ :�,r--R. `t���rry�,.��! :,j,•� ��r�, "�� �,� -
�,� ♦�r' ��/��11�,� .:� � ` �!!l11�Ir►I r� M►ii�� '� � "�.
� �i ��LF,L��c'.��;r �r.� i �*���r1�i • ♦ � -,
rl��♦ �► ��/ ��� �� ���r �� f��'� � ,/,�+�►.�y�i �'+ � �; �
� �� e,a I�A���►�.;w • • /111�� . �► `�' t� �■ �'.r
! ;; ►�� u��r�Et�e�f ���cr�.�r . ��•�► �■ :►y► ��ll►�►q �■ �.
i t� ,7. ---+ Yl�if��C It i!�►L 1��/i►�� � � ►�� /r:
� �. ,�� III�����h�� ..���i�i�i� � ��l�Li�u .i1�/�i':A� Q�r
�1 a's �• u��u�su� Itl���r��►����1�• ■�r ■�-:� �j.�, ___ ,
�-: �liii� � � � i `►��ii►! �.� ��I%���i�:.1i� �",�- �
jiL�1/11� �i ������ ��f� ` 'r��� � =1 '� ��� i''�
, �1� ��� �\ �►�►1 . • �--=-- rr� �
y .n� ui r �� � /►4
�:: :�r�`r��i�� �'liii►t� �i`,, ����,;�; •� : �► �s
'�������:���r� � 7 � ��r,�l���t �i i � ' � it...�� �
• ♦ �IIIII� ��� � . ��l�� �. --�'. �� , ,,, rr�
� r►,114�.�. � !._. a� � -�'-�'s�
' , Z���� � � � � i.���w �n� �
� 1/�L►';; �lu�l'y�ll�� � ''� ■ ���� 1'/ r �� ��/�� �w �.�� t. �� '
� I, ,. `��� �ry �w
��....�....... � � :� •;•-1,��: :���:: :���N� .��'� �� ='r��
'� ,� � , �'�■•� ■� . �" � =����
� �' / ; � .. � � , i �
; _, « �► �,/��► _ ,,�.� ■ � /'r
` • �� �, .. � � � . � � •��
- i� •�1�° � �i ■ • .�, : .
�' �I�� ��� �■ ■ . � .
� ���'�� �'��� �t�� C, �
�� ��
k< 5 � r �
� 1 • I f(."1� 'fT ?MN .t
' r�� �� �� �,
� •I �� � �E� �t'���� �` g •, ���
� ' ' � L. r �.r •-�,�� -�� .,
.
��� �;� �"' �� a� �� '� _ �� ��.�
�� �'��V _ . �? ° ;�j� �' � � �■ ■��
. ��,�M1u��
�� � ' ��° ���s�N�������3l�"7tii����►��� ■�w�■ ■���1��' ■
����a��.���r,��� -1 � �! s� �, � ^ .
�r. .� � �fz�,.�--. ����, ���1��� �3ii��i� � �
� -�,�.r:�;;�,,,��� ,� :r� :�� �I/111
«�tu�� �� ;��:��=:,�.:��.��. r�► . �■ 11111� IIC3
-----..-��.
�`'� !� � � ' t� !�tltt!!!lE����I�t��� ■ie� ����l�?�!�'�3�� �
A►� ��� �� : ����������E�� � ■����"�.
;�� �C � - - - ■1:�:�: C - � �
c�:'�` 1� � � t�������:� _ -
�L�'Y/� ��� i:r" :i� ...1111111�����:;������ ��
��� _ �
" ■� �'� ■ �� ■��it :. � � ■■ �1�fl�f
� •: .. ■� ■- -- 7i.��-'�IIIi�' � �
..�� �. ■ � L ..� �►.�! � .� . ���1�;�
� � � '■
� ������� a
11�� � , � �,� ����� � . ,
�Ifllll ■ � �+a• ■��• � �
������ , �� �; � ; ✓
� r �� ��
� � ��
� : � � �� �
_
- '_ �. . � i � � �
111�(a //ii11:(1!/�� 1������ w��1■ �� + �i��7
�/t/ .!: :�. � �► ��� �L�i���■ !�� �����
3��r� ������ : �111� 1111�111� �� i41i � �', i:�
���s ���Ii �-.�� �Il�rl.��-1 �� :� �� � i�
�►• _ � i■ � •• . ��r . ..
/III►� �� " M��'��=,��
_ �
�l11/�� � i � � ._ . . . . . . .
__ . . . _ . .. .
/1���1� ► - ■� .. . . . . . . . .
.� � _ _ -- � � �' . . .
. . ..
. � . � � � 1 : 11 . li
�r!�11��!!' n
, • . 1 � � 11 -
�
• � . � � �� �� ��� �: _ . ti �
: , i�ii • � �
s
EXHIBIT I
QUERIN II ANNEXATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of the
Northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.,
King County, Washington, lying northerly of the south line of tlie north 165
feet of the south half(1/2) thereof;
LESS the west 30 feet thereof.
TOGETHER WITH that portion of the Southwest quarter of the Southeast
quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County,
Washington, Iying southwesterly of the existing City Limits of Renton as
annexed by Ordinance No. 4092, and lying easterly of the existing City of
Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordin,ance No. 4026.
� � EI ED
� •
JUN 1 � �b�
Annezation Review Form
Transportation Systams Div,
[ J 10% Notice of Intent (X j 60%Annexation Petition
TO: Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility /
Police Transportation �/
Public Works Maintenance CuRent Planning
FROM: Eoonomic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Pianning
SUBJECT: Proposed Querin Annexation -Expanded
LOCATION: The Querin II annexation abuts Renton on ifs western and southem boundary
and is bordered by Hoquiam Avenue NE (142"�Avenue SE)on the west, NE 13"' Street, on the
south� and 144"'Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. It is located at the base of an
uninoorporated peninsula of land bet�sveen 141�Avenue SE� if extended on the west and 144th
Avenue SE, if extended, on the easfi. The area is bounded on the north by the south side of NE
Sunset Boulevard.
Date Circulated: June 16. 2006 Comments Due: June 26. 2006
Generai information
Area . Approximately 24 acres.
Street length : 6001inear feet(existing); est. 18,650' at
buildout
Assessed Value (taxable) : $4,602,000 (existing development)
Estimated Population . 39
Current Uses
Residential : 17 single family units
Commercial :
Industriai :
Pubiic :
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family (8 du/net ac) and
Residential Low Density(4 du/net ac)
Future Uses: : +74 Detached single-family residenfial housing
Future Po ulation • 170 ersons 4 housin units .
i2eviewing Departmen Divisio : Tv�n s�or-l�a-�T'�H 5,�5,-�-�r+�cS
1. Does the expanded annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
department/division?
l�o. I-4awev�v� a�o«, N� S�case'� �Du�va►� �S�C f00� 2 6 w�tw� �"�,� �raf�o sa,�l
�Nexd-�oN �t'}�� aG�u�s� fiph o.�'r��k�,.o�-w� ��� � �'�'f'r,�`rc�.l �
ae.eo«����(a�� .��cv� Gt�SD�Tpla�x �a c��c�e� �R 9on.
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area? r os� dKne�a'�+'Dn
�/Gs (�t�e�«��� f�yu,a,�. A✓Gkt4�.`M� ���FZhcI �'✓CMrc�t SF� g6Hfi�'ih � P 'Jo
s�� vw�lw�r P�vc�,�,.� w�d�Ki �Kd i�i�c�r�e�ss' o�o �+f Htee.� �,fy o�' Re«��•�
s+a����ts. �41 s.�cu.rb a►+d ��ff�r� s�dcwalks �K�c s� �4r��� verj` "'""'�r,��sf3K'f".
.eNKt NE sK h�w �oc.al a�ces bcai�`�'i�K �t l�Ni1��'����'K 3i�C"
���q r�d, k}d'�cia»� Rv c( s
wawlt� �b� ,� � �te Cx�e.�ts� p� �.rtS�tnq p►-o�tvfr o�k�vs �'�d� -�cc�Ir��e new devcl9v�,r,�f;
' Z�. (��f�J)
'�' �E �rd�K n►� s�NSe�- B�c.lrv,r� sR ac
3 � l_ rC 4 �� t+erb �Kd�►�,,�eY srdewz�(c �K�I s�i•+ne�- /� �k�
Srt rtov►-eX►3'f�w'�' .�loK 'l'k� *r�►`f'7e G D��it I►o osect.:t ' � �/
stct�.u��lk� 3wd s�►ee.�F r�J��J do c�c�f ok �i.�� �� o�� �.�Nek:'froh �sr�e . Cav6 :wd w�kr�
1���1wa� w�.�fl► s»d�av��.ew�f �s��kw�:: �S $'a6sfaMd*�7� srJ� ��{'IvE s�r,�e�-Bl�, ��
G."w�c'cN!'� k''K L'kw�► +�d �st �'.dy o���w�l+� !►ar�• Ko /a�i ��s S�sf� fh J,k w i�,, .' '
ak u�. �-.�s�� gl�� 26��Jfi« �� ��,kers�ro�r .s�fi. /�,wevar � s�reef�iMp�v,��a�.�r �
3. ne� �r i^o.adw� `� � wSl�oT �as tdcK��'cd ��;�:
b�.� l�as Ro ��fibl��ar �liea �ie w�r%s���'��d gduf�i� f� awr►.rx.��oR a�� ..
- -- - �a�al�w e� N� S�eh,r� BI�►,d �iK �i Ka w, r�r: d ct,.��.,
� 3,� '�'�te. pr.rt�� a r►re e K s�rc�. sr1� w o u.l�1 b t �.'�` I
6 �°i��`6oe'fi ° �;��i �r.��,. o i �r►d�+b� Mew► �ev�tc �ee.�ef Nk ICSS �Hsf�llr�l �
3. Doe�t�iis propos�e�Cpanc���nr�e�'a�i�re �ese �
nt a logical extension of services provided
by your department/division?
�es. :�;�:
:��
����
4. Can you provide a dollar figure estimate af the oost to provide servioe to this area at currenf
development and at buildout(maintaining existing, city-vvide levels�of service)? Can you identify
any other costs� e.g. one-time capitai oosts, the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
Cuvrt�f D�v�clop►�eK+ : ,Cor�r zsso«���(.w, rr►a�h�'cKakte o�� akts�-r,c ��akc� � -
ZwY ad��'�taka� MGc.�� 'pa✓Gr�e►�."� MaV�4`ctirsf .3�5!q KrK D�l �'�► k;�a � _:.
�-r►c� �1:F S�cks�f Rivd ��DNI�t Oe �'+s�h�q�ti� /��i►,�ewUa.,.��s»r� ��q G A-✓e� Al E
wif't�,�C�,,e�,5f�''e��l� �-{�ik (�s�-��,+>t.d a-f S� a-Knk�.1 �x,�u�'� f Y s�s asso�..:f��
shou,lcl ,�o�be �. �Ks.+�ct�� ��ch {�w �.e C� . U�a�r��C�K o�s 68f,a��`����.��
Wo�(d 6�C �� �t c,.r�Cas� o�exis-�K � ,L � /�^ jw���
y ►%IGr�y DWIt.�vS. G�d Y.?t�Ix Di��IE .��MSt�
8lv� wr.�e.rd. al�a..bt a�'�ke . �► < ,-c�
1.i� �s r.c �. . - . �/�'Jt s ee'X�r�t�► �Dli�+er'� ow K t o�s �t`���t e� GtJ S fAc+T �
. p►� +k+tt �r!�,��„�' D�+w.Rt►,� �qr:'f;
(.
. � ._ .
�.
/i'T 1,76C l`�pr{.'�" i u}�id��r�l yt0 PT�'46t lo-i(�t �G 4�tt /V� ZK[F KGGJ STI'� '=�a?
`� 3 { S S!'VN//�1� MQb.1 ���
��vit���e�,,.�1' wo�eld b� a.�--f� ex�p�� ��as-h� P��,c�-f�, aw�e«� ahd"�o� ne� .�:.=:
�2V�Clo,wKn-1� �SrS lssec�}'f'�rs< <,�rt �, yy���wT�nsrcGC o� lXIS� `:�W:
`"�'"' "e�/ S�n„� a�s��/t {r �d a N. a dsl���ia/
pav� �n��.►.�G � w��a-�c�ene�y c.fls�s .{�� �'�u�l� �ifr
N�u���f�'i'.� 6�,�rdoK�s�okl�n�f,�e a wz�ua� "bu►<�e� ow�4�e G�► .��2d,�'oa,`1 `"y _-
C�khhuz-1 G.s`�s �tir S�Kc�t� akd S�1'��rJ/f'�ikr 'f
���6/t{'�r�� �i qh'�) d+� � , N� Swk sc� J a vE e�'�r�►��r� �s 6� .33 /���'�k .7.u� _ �
J J �'� v ,��vs/a�u'�i K �e. tP-krlt�Ci�`�rmh s�Te w(��c���lo
b� a��lcc Gx��x ��ex�s� P�o� owk,�-s a =�:�;-
.'� �' t�s � n'��r netv devt�,9v�+r�•�`t't�? 6U�'QdT - .
Generalrecommendationandoomments: �Y ��� p�J�`�� d�Ps Mofccck�--F,Z.s7;
T'��. T�ahs o�f�.�ro„ SrST`'KC5 �'���s�o� �a
lvhc�i�r ��►��+� �s �O`�Po s.�d ak n�,�i fc k� n�.Go��F�.s ►�� �►.L(�K�y
Signature:---�¢� �;�� Date: � z,Z ��
D�vis�uk R�view or,��K� r
::���.
• • ��c�/
�nnegat�on Review Form ��N VED
1 9 20
[ ) 10% Notice of Intent [X] 60% Annexation Petition ��r�oF ps
TO: Building Surface Water Utility
UT/�lT YSR�EMS
Fire Water Utility ✓
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM: Economic Development, Neighborhoods 8� Strategic Pianning
SUBJECT: Proposed Querin Annexation - Expanded
LOCATION: The Querin II annexation abuts Renton on its western and southem boundary
and is bordered by Hoquiam Avenue NE (142"�Avenue SE) on the west, NE 13�'Street, on the
south, and 144"'Avenue SE, if e�ended, on the east. It is located at the base of an
unincorporated peninsula of land between 141�Avenue SE, if extended on the west and 144th
Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. The area is bounded on the north by the south side of NE
Sunset Boulevard.
Date Circulated: June 16, 2006 Comments Due: June 26. 2006
Gene�al Information
A�ea : Approximately 24 acres.
Street length : 600 linear feet(existing); est. 18,650' at
buildout
Assessed Value (taxable) : $4,602,000 (existing development)
Estimated Population : 39
Current Uses
Residential : 17 single family units
Commercial :
Industrial .
Public :
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family (8 du/net ac) and
Residential Low Density(4 du/net ac)
Future Uses: : +74 Detached single-family residential housing
Future Po ulation • 170 ersons 74 housin units .
�
Reviewing Department/Division: ;.�t-1�
1. Does the expanded annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
department/division? 1 ��
�r.
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area? (�- ��::':c, ��-�-'��c� 6�u�- •�i�"�..��/ �,c,t,
�(Zi�,� .�� ,r ,2.� ��-
���..�� t����-- ������ �-����.��. � ��,��x�t�:
,�
( ver)
3. Does this proposed expanded annexation represent a logical extension of services provided
by your department/division? ���
4. Can you provide a dollar figure estimate of the cost to provide service to this area at current
development and at buildout(maintaining e�usting, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify
any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
(-�b ��=+'�,��1��-r'�P �G��T"u:�_ ���'���Jv�i�Cg- ��y�K
f l��Z-� ,. �c"Ir-�����'`( l� �'L�- ��fr--��-i�`�. ,i��'`-'�1�,,� ���
General recommendation and comments:
�u l������(,lJt-�- � �L�n��cl L�L�/
Signatur Date: � � �
Annegation Review Form
[ j 10% Notice of Intent (X] 60% Annexation Petition
r-- __._
TO: Building Surface W�#er Utility
Fire y Water Utility � ,
Parics Wastewater Utillty �� � -
Police Transport�tion �
r�
Public Works Maintenance Current P anning ��N 16 2,���
� -�..
FROM: Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planni� ,
SUBJECT: Proposed Querin Annexation - Expanded
___,
LOCATION: The Querin II annexation abuts Renton on its western and southem boundary
and is bordered by Hoquiam Avenue NE (142"�Avenue SE) on the west, NE 13�' Street, on the
south, and 144"'Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. It is located at the base of an
unincorporated peninsula of land between 141 St Avenue SE, if extended on the west and 144th
Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. The area is bounded on the north by the south side of NE
Sunset Boulevard.
Date Ci�culated: June 16, 2006 Comments Due: June 26, 2006
General Information
Area : Approximately 24 acres.
Street length : 600 linear feet (existing); est. 18,650' at
buildout
Assessed Value (taxable) : $4,602,000 (existing development)
Estimated Population : 39
Current Uses
Residential : 17 single family units
Commercial :
Industrial :
Public :
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family (8 du/net ac) and
Residential Low Density(4 du/net ac)
Future Uses: : +74 Detached single-family residential housing
Future Po ulation • 170 ersons 74 housin un'
Reviewing DepartmenbDivision: �v+�.e, ��
1. Does the expanded annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
department/division?
U
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area?
��
(Over)
3. Does this proposed expanded annexation represent a logical extension of services provided
by your department/division?
,�5 •
4. Can you provide a dollar figure estimate of the cost to provide service to this area at current
development and at buildout (maintaining exisfing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify
any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
�� �o��� T�
/ �1 f f /��c e �A r � f�`e ��r ✓,�C-`�' - ,�HS"/Q�cT<i��z
CdS� d �c' dd�Ci/'��t c ..,� '
a��� � ���� a /' �n .
I/�a ���/i�eGv 5 �'l�t �!�e .�JP �
Gene�al recommendation and comments:
(� � d�� e� -
Signature: Date: � o�d ��
��
1
Annexation Review Form
[ j 10% Notice of intent [X j 60% Annexation Petition
TO: Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM: Economic Development, Neighborhoods 8� St�ategic Planning
SUBJECT: Proposed Querin Annexation - Expanded
LOCATION: The Querin II annexation abuts Renton on its western and southern boundary
and is bordered by Hoquiam Avenue NE (142"�Avenue SE) on the west, NE 13�' Street, on the
south, and 144"'Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. It is located at the base of an
unincorpo�ated peninsula of land between 141�Avenue SE, if extended on the west and 144th
Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. The area is bou�ded on the north by the south side of NE
Sunset Boulevard.
Date Circulated: June 16. 2006 Comments Due: June 26. 2006
General Information
Area : Approximately 24 acres.
Street length : 600 linear feet(existing); est. 18,650'at
buildout
Assessed Value (taxable) : $4,602,000 (existing development)
Estimated Population : 39
Current Uses
Residential : 17 single family units
Commercial :
Industrial :
Public :
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family (8 du/net ac) and
Residential Low Density(4 du/net ac)
Future Uses: : +74 Detached single-family residential housing
Future Po ulation • 170 ersons 74 housin units .
Reviewing Department/Division: �d���
1. Does the expanded annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
department/division? � o
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area? �
a
(Over)
3. Does this proposed expanded annexation represent a logical extension of services provided
by your department/division?
y�5.
4. Can you provide a doilar figure estimate of the cost to provide service to this area at current
development and at buiidout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify
any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
General recommendation and comments: G,n�-<<�� ��e ��- Q���� �-`�� �'�-- �v� c_s�,
-�c�lz eac�•. ac����cy. f 1sZ.1��ec�3 q c1�ec� "�'� �la_ Ci. '�'�-� �
Signature: � �• < <<� �--� Date: `•��•��
Annexation Review Form
[ ] 10% Notice of Intent [X] 60%Annexation Petition
TO: Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance 4 � Current Planning
FROM: Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT: Proposed Querin Annexation - Expanded
LOCATION: The Querin II annexation abuts Renton on its western and southern boundary
and is bordered by Hoquiam Avenue NE (142"�Avenue SE)on the west, NE 13"' Street, on the
south, and 144"'Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. It is located at the base of an
unincorporated peninsula of land befirveen 141�Avenue SE, if extended on the west and 144th
Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. The area is bounded on the north by the south side of NE
Sunset Boulevard.
Date Circulated: June 16. 2006 Comments Due: June 26. 2006
General Information
Area . Approximately 24 acres.
Street length : 600 linear feet(existing); est. 18,650'at
buildout
Assessed Value (taxable) : $4,602,000 (existing devefopment)
Estimated Population : 39
Current Uses
Residential : 17 singte family units
Commercial :
Industrial :
Public :
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family (8 du/net ac) and
Residential Low Density(4 du/net ac)
Future Uses: : +74 Detached single-family residential housing
Future Po ulation • 170 er ns 74 housin units .
Reviewing Department/Division: � �N, .,
1. Does the expanded annexation rep�esent any unique or significant problems for your
department/division? _ � �
I �f z ND � � �� � �- _...�.---------.�
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area? � �.�
(c�2'� 5-r °�
(Over)
3. �Does this proposed expanded annexation represent a logical extension of services provided
by your depa�tment/division?
��
4. Can you provide a dollar figure estimate of the cost to provide service to this area at current
development and at buildout(maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify
any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
Genera! �ecommendation and comments:
�� 1�� s rua�-���. �-�
� �� �.�
� ��
�s �-� s -�-��,�..�
�-� --�
�
Signature: Date: �
�ti`�Y o� CITY OF RENTON
�y Economic Development,Neighborhoods and
� ru � Strategic Planning
Kathy Keolker,Mayor Alex Pietsch,Administrator
��N�O
May 16,2006
Lenora Blauman
Executive Secretary
Washington State Boundary Review Board
Yesler Building,Room 402
400 Yesler Way
Seattle,WA 98104
SUBJECT: PROPOSED EXTENSION OF BRB REVIEW TIME—QUERIN
ANNEXATION(FILE NO. 2222)
Dear Ms.Blaumar�:
On December 23, 2005,the City of Renton sent the Notice of Intent package for the above
referenced annexation to the Board for their consideration. Typically,under the provisions of
RCW 36.93.105,the Board would have 120 days after filing to complete their review and make a
finding or the annexation would be considered approved. Because jurisdiction was invoked on
February 9, 2006,the 120-day review period would now end on July 6,2006 unless extended by
- the City. The City understands that because of the Board's unprecedented hearings schedule it
may be difficult to complete its review and issue a decision in the case of this annexation by July
6°2�06.
As a consequence,the Administration is hereby authorizing the Boundary Review Board to
extend the review period for the Querin Annexation from July 6,2006 to July 31,2006. If you or
the Board has additional questions,please contact Don Erickson(425-430-6581).
Sincerely,
t �� � ��-- -_
Alex Pietsch �
Administrator
Attaclunent
cc: Jay Covington
Rebecca Lind
_�-'��
u;�nuov��e�en9.,o...,;;�,e�;gaerinl�A.���ctenien ltr,decic�r R E N T O N
1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055
AHEAD OF THE CURVE
�This papercontains 50%recyded material,30%post consumer
¢
,= ��.ip��`lii :�
�������y ,I�I�` �'`
r:
i, ���;.��
_�
� � � �
� uu��.. � �
��ti.-�
�,�..
��
V x �-;
�<� ��..�. �
�G
�v:.
�������p��� ���������.������ �,.,::: ��.���������
Public Hear�r�g ta ��nsider
60°/a Direct Petitic�n and
P'assibie Future
Zc�ning
�r�y �s, ��a�
! � •
•
# i .� -.
,�.
•
���
1r
�
�!
.1,
�
��������� ����������
� PAA—Within Rentan's Potential Annexatinn Area
� Location - Between Hoquiam Avenue NE on the west
and 144th Avenue SE, if extended, on the east, sauth
of SE 112t'' Street
� Size — 24.01-acres tprevio�s versi�n wa��7.�8-acres} �
� Natural Features —Wes#ern port�c�n of site is relatively
flat wnereas eastern pQrtion is much stee�er dropping
off some 32 feet into Honey Creek
� Existinq Land Use — 17 existing single-family horn�s
and 5 vacant parceis
� Boundaries — as shown on next slide
i
,......_.__ . � ..
;r� *a� -T�, - `�} :-s qf� ' `" T�,�� :i' ..
� '� ,`,w .. .,� , '.�`r. �y�''.m�r '.a$�s.;"�. ., ;
i !� . . .. s ��t �"' . -� ;#? .. :: r`4 .
` , Mcc•YFsa �' . . . ' " i.
� . � S�'iyY»iEy Aro:¢r^.c:; '. .td �`'� ���'aa�sL,jL�i:t�"' '
i .�".+ � 3 V.�j �, «�,, � '��
� ,�
j �� t7�sa€: n;��tiC i:avyi wre N� ' :.-�T� .� � `.�, � .
"'a ?;: . . ,�" ' �I...„_, `.:` � . � �r' y' .
� �-,.. , ; �;.�tr.:i'p,�. . 1r -.
ii! J �,. , , �
i
i LU ::' t � , , . _ ...,t .
,.� � � � f'eP;E�SvB I�. . _ —
! � , s ry , . .� _ ' . •. �F�.' ';u:�:�! A..t�`1' �i:.�ilL �•.r 3�.- t ,?� � �s
:�C�tt�P"�if ����Y �J4 , . � .. . ' , i.�_ry . ' ;.
. . `. , ^ ��� . , . �.. . �' . � �! . „' ' , . ,1;�0.,.�<. .. :,,f
� , :\�`r, f �.ef . .. . `�y •'.'. �� ' Q C. . . ' , . .
<< '
� ,,e ,� ��, ,. . —
�. . .
:, y . . _ , „ , „,
. . .�.._._..... ,,.� 7 . - f.. .�,i.t ,.
i •e,7 _ ��r Ahsf F7b4(; � � _ T ,
� �, {j �"�" � �
� I.,p?(9 .r � i , x t �' ^ - .
C� A
�`�<.� _w ,. Y; ��i. '. ,.:;tC'" '•iE I����tn3��A�- ��• . .
t c= ,c^:
,...
;qt�,.a.�,�e `at �'te . •;a � ' :.:'. �__ `: ,- .:.>_�'._x . � •>
, , •
.. � � ;-s _ i,:- ' x. . . i
i t `$�� .. .....__.i--- -.t�_,..K..;`"_:. � � i. 9 -. . . .
� � ,:ro a„+" i`'�; ,.tQ'!� i. " ,��/• " �.e�, � �d
; � Pc�tiai J�tmexaitic>(�Ac�€3ournd Yaiv Y �
= o� ' #�f� u.ie��Q .+ . . � -,,�.z5'� —._. :�:�ap' .;r�x�.
':� —-�__..�.— kT�,—"'—�.••,--.....:.5� .� � ...,. ..4 �l...> .-, d . .a � } � . ...
�`' ����1t1��1V��.1���Vf./'A�.Y� ���� {a••��'�A" . 5 ..� ' � .� -
A,�. c: � ' 'r: � . � , � -�_ = j .,fi�{,? .�r,� H� � € . .
. �f� . � � ' . . �� f _ ! • �y �' �' .. f % ",
�� { . . , ,i.. .g,..��....
�
. .� .- 1,.
ua ; :-� �a�ab "h;
�. -�---
- .. � _�_ �. _....._. ` �{
:
.. .._ ( _........r_, ......« ,_ ......��,�,�r�: i�v
�`�'j , �CT j�'.��" ,v''�
� y�. �y . —�.. ...r,..._ -:_
J�d�"..j�,� 3�.. � � . . . "'-'.__ .....
. ' ., �'.', ..
� � � � `-a" �.! :�i -' . ,
. . � . .� ,� _• �
�:4�
_ t.`Y'; 1.. �
W
' �` , �:
�� �� ���� � I�y�� � (�
� ,.
� �
� �
� � ��
� , �
� �
�." � i'�
� �
� �
� �'
E
� �
� �
� �
� �
� � '�� �
,n ^�
U ;J er
� � �� �
� =
� � � � r �." s r, �.
� � � °��' � � � � �
`� 'k � � » �, �� z �, n�
ou� � .�, � � �
� N t� �=. � � ^. � � Ea
,-„ � , � ,-
y, ,.. U
� �,
■ �n
� ,�,� � . �� f� � �
�3 '` �_ , �
� ` �y�+ � i, �
"� . 3. �, ;�
� ,� c.;
� � � "<�«� � ;,,
«�" � � ^�
...
�i»� r� ��i . � "�"
� { � ' � �
x°, �{ � ^r,y
� ��(.��� � �
'� " ��`� � v
�
� ��..� �� � � � o
� t j
Y (
� � ¢��l.'� �� �
� �.. �� f � *� . V
� �' ( � � $•-`
� � r" +�, � j �
i'� � a
� r � � Y
� ^ i � � , '"`� u
� c :` �� ��'� � �
� �:
�., „ '� � ,; .�
� r
� � V , � � ` ' �
.=.f � �' c � � �;
� � .� ; � � � f,, ��
' ,F, C
l.� �-y+ U. ! J � �' � .=,1
� ,.. �' � :-� G
✓�'� ^ � r� f :� �, � , O
"'� � ;� }, .� � � .� .^, C7 ,.�` ' N
�s � ,� C =.-r r,�y� '+, C/� � � �� .. � Cy
r
�'�„�+ ..-� � C �" W .. �����;� �� � � . ... .: ..� ...
/•� �
�..�.�
� � 4 .,, � o�` ��
L; ��j�
�y�r�"'� �'"':M,�y
.�a
i� �'^'
� .�� �.�t�.�
� ��' ^s�
,�:y-» � • :, ,..�. ` , '�' ,,. -.. ,; .
.�.,.. . , _: _�
- �-:,,� 4� ,, �, ,Lt :� , ..
� i�
1 k'
.. K`o-�`�. . . .
� ;
o.. � ,. � � . . . .. .. +•� .
,. ���� � � � �F . �.
� . �
. � � � I�I�II .
'� �A� . � � ..
� � �����m��� �-,� '^ � �'-'".�.`uyrv .
,� -�..^:^w �>+ '�. �ai;,`
��+��rv�� � �` a£�, ..v
��» �.���� �\ F'�yv��%`�ry� �»x �
� � .
����. '��',w''f.�.-� �;r3'.s� ,.. e,�'
s �k�������� ���� �
� � � 3
,,, ������� � �,,� ��.,3�i �
�,=';.
� ��, �w � i:.m '� ��:���� �.��r+>
� 3 a�„z,'�+`�`��i�k' .�, a a.� `r �� �0.�1', .
���,���'�;�;�� . `r'�2 i``. � �Yl�,
� 3a�
� � �:,� � .. � � � .
�.�"n'
��� � �� �
�m � � "�� �
�si�3.,_ ��s�:<�. ,.� .,w_�i�_�., .. � ,�n` � �
Vic«� lookin� ilo�-tl�� alc�n� 1�2"��A�-enu� SE tc����ards SR �{)0 (Sz��set}
� � �
� °��'�,� � � ' � �����"��, ;�` -
����� �� � ��� � �
�s; �� s� ,. s, k.
- �,� � ;� � n�;
.�; "�r� �: >��
� ��s: .r. �� � . � �
"� '��� � � '�' . �
��� ��. � � � �
�_W. � �1�
� � �� �
�.... >� ��� r
' �r, ��=`�., � �
��� �� ��, � � ��
< �
. .� aa ,�:' �s-� f; '�r
t�, `"�.� �i � t 1,:-��7 ��� �' �.
�:.. ���
>� �3 :�v
s�4 �� n3. �I,
Vie�v looki»b nc�r-th���cst �iloll� 14?"�� Avenue S�. near NE Suliset I31vc�
�������� ����i����� ��
���������������
■ Topography — rolling with steep slopes tc�
east
� Environmental Constraints — HoneX Creek
and its ravine result in steep slopes and a
high erosion area an eastern partion of site
County's 2002 Surface Water Design Manual,
Level 2 flow-control standards t�r greater are
recommended
���������� ����������� �� ��������
�����I���
;
� Fire �;
�� �_
Within District#25 "�' `� '+�
�`r"`
� UtIIIt12S ° °��' �` ,,'
_� Within Water District#�0 Service Area � �"��� �
Within Renton Sewer Service Area ���
r� SChOOIS �
��1 ���_
Within Renton School Distric# �rr �:�,��
��� -��
�������� ���� ��� ������������
� ������ � � �
K.C. �and Use Map - # �����
� � �„� �,
Urban Residentiat 412 �. �
duiac � � �I�� �
�� �,�� t
���� � �. i � i����„
��
�� � ������� �
K.C. Zoninq - ��.�� '��
R-4 - Residential 4 ir� �.V..� � �
du/ac* ���` � . ��Ilt!',�`�,��
���• ��•� ��
*Bonuses up ta 6 du/gr. ac. ��'",���� +�". � rr�$
�� � �r�� ��I
Sitc �����
Kiu� Count��Zonut;ll�ap
�������� ������� ���� ����������
Renton �omp Plan L�nd � , � �_� ��� �_
Use Map
— Residential Low Density ��� � r
(RLD) ` ��� . �� _, �� ,,: �.
� � ��, .
�
— Residential Single Family �
\p�+\ � z
f1,�7�
Possible Rentan Zoninq ����� ;"�,.�
R-8 (8 du/net acre) � � . .
Sitc � Rentan Campreh�nsi�re Plan
>F' a ,r ''' '`'
>
, ;1- �� . ... �,
_...._� i �. ; �f._ � � '.f7
i 'i: .lrt. .
, � � ,J. i{� ��' 1 .
� �.� ,
:�.f � _ . , . ' � . . ,
. ,...._ - -.. -,
: , .._._ •, , �.
. ..�.._'._.._._T ..._�-it
/� , �.....:..,,.," I \ \ .� �}. �.
"�•--.,, ",�t�y Cteck _ . t. � . `V�,.
'-�,!'' "'�` V'3 � ( C.;��.
�i n.
ex ,�, `. ., `• �`�
c i H ..,�� - -- . .
<`v �
TY �
.....y
�i
�~ i�! . ^I
�: . . ,
� ...__,,....� �
,. . .:I � �---
� ��
� ' '__�.. ' , "
�`
�- y
-- � � . --
P.':�^r.T. r, �
�:��, i:!::'f " '' ^
_ _,. _ '.'� i �
. _.
� ,
s
i ... � r.sx�'��.....,. '�.:.._
Querin II Ex anded Annexation " 4U0 %IN�
�, -�, : ;
-
�� ,- -
�.; "� � , ��. ..(i'�•` �'
� =�, . . �.� , t
! lj :��.-
�i , , � ..
.
:_ ,
_._.... . � . ,-. .
_�__.._..__ _ .._ A,
-- _ � :;
;�..; � ..- -' . � ''.'' � `,,:t:
�+,�;`t poncY C:roek `,� � � .�Et1�
:il`;-,
_ , `^--._,�1 �. ��� .
> ,�'\ �,�_ ��
�� �� �
`�\'�.��� ,i L� � I .
..
�.,, �,g
, � . _ .� ..
1 ,_ _.
� -.. �.
�; �,
, _...._�
� .. _.
� �� _._. .
,�
_ ; _
,
;tf„' r��. `�i r. '
, :... c�
_.
� . . ._ � , �. � -
i _
I
',, . � _...._._. .
, ... .....:;.�.�ew''�5�;:��'•:...
_ _ '
Querin II Ex anded Annexation � ��' R`"'
9
����r�������� �'��r� ,����������
�����i��
Policy LU-36. Encourag� Subject sit� is lacated within
annexation where avail- �ity's designated PAA and
ability of infrastructure and � urban services are available
services allow for urban � to serve site
densities �
Policy LU-37.3. Annex j New develt�pment has
lands subject to develop- ( �����'red to the south and
ment pressure that might { W�st of the subject site.
benefit from City ; Staff are recc�mmending use
development standards of County s �005 Qrainage
Manual
Policy LU-42. Support � Haney Creelc w�uld
annexations where it would ; P�'�sumably receive I�ss
protect naturaf resources ' impact under Renton's R-8
� zcaning
���I������: ���������� ��������� ���a���`�
����������
� Preservation of natural This annex�tion does not �ffect
neighborhoods �nd the mobile hc�me {�ark to the easi
communi#ies
.� Use of physical '142nd Ave SE �and SR-9�70 tc� the
boundaries north define the site
� Prevention of abnormally Prc�pc�sed baund�ries ar� not
irregular boundaries abnorm�lly irregular
� Annexation of cities of The subject annexation sit� is
unincar�orated areas urban in ch�ract�r and is
which are urban in 1c�cated within Rentc�n's
character designat�;d PAA
�
������ ������ ��-�������
� Assumes 17 existinq hauses w/ �verage
assessed value of $22Q,OQ(J
� Assumes 64 new homes w/in 10 ye�rs
� Assumes average assessed u�lue of
$450,000 for new single-family homes
� Assumes one-time park dev�lopment cost
of $40,498
������ � �������`�
Current Full
Development Development
Revenues � $21 ,297 $�43,722
Costs � $24,512 �121 ,Q�7
�
�
Surplus/ j ($3,215) $22,695
Deficit
,
One time parks acquisition and development cosk of$4Q,498
�������i��
.� This proposed expar�ded annexatic�n is
generally consistent with relev�nt
Countywide Planning Pc�licies and reievan#
Boundary Review Baard objectives and
policies for annexation
�► No major impedimen#s ta th��provision t�f � � � �
City services to the area were identified in
the City's review
.
������������ ���������.��
� Gity would net apprc�ximately �22,�95 per
year in revenue in 2Q06 dc�Ilars at time c►f
estimated build �ut in 1 Q y�ars
� Propased I�-4 zaning is cc�nsis�ent with
Comp Plan Resi�enti�l L�c�w Densi�y I�n�d � �
use designation
� Proposed R-8 zcrning is consistent with
Camp Plan Single F�mily Residential land
use designation
����������1��� ����I��
The Administration recommends that the Bc�ard:
Accept the expanded boundaries af the expanded
Querin Annexation for the following reasr�ns:
It is consistent with relevant abjectives and
policies for annexations, �nd
It is consistent with the County's Annexatie�n
Initiative of expediting the annexatic�n of the
remaining unincorporated urban pc�rtic�ns of
King County
Thtzrih��°c�tr � ��
�.�
:� �
�'���y";
�:'
�
r �I�it�,
��� ° � �
�, ����
��
�� •�s����
�� x ���- {
; � �
%��. �5
� ��
�
��:
6 �:.
ti,.
.
'�f'� ,;"3e'
5 L��
� �:.
}� :d b✓� �L_
l�
� �ti`�Y O� �ITY OF RENTON
♦ � ♦ Mayor
Kathy Keolker
��N�o�
January 18, 2006
Judy Tessandore, Chair
Washington State Boundary Review Board
for King County
Yesler Building, Room 402
400 Yesler Way
Seattle, WA 98104
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER EXPANSION OF
BOUNDARIES FOR THE QUERIN ANNEXATION
Dear Ms. Tessandore:
Pursuant to RCW 36.93.100,the City of Renton is requesting that the Boundary Review Board
hold a public hearing on the above referenced annexation to consider expanding its boundaries to
the north and west to create a more practical municipal boundary and more logical service areas.
By invoking the Board's jurisdiction,the City is requesting that the Boundary Review Board
make a finding in regards to this request within 120 days.
The City of Renton submitted the Querin Annexation Notice of Intent to Expand Renton's
Corporate Limits by Annexation on December 23, 2005,pursuant to RCW 36.93.090. This was
for a 7�3-acre area that normally, because of its size,would be exempt from a public hearing
before the Board. The expanded area is approximately 24 acres and bordered by the City on 60%
of its perimeter.
This request is supported by a number of the Countywide Planning Policies. These include:
Countywide Planning Policy FW-13. This policy states that `cities are the appropriate
provider of local urban services to Urban Areas either directly or by contract"as well as that
"within the Urban Area,as time and conditions warrant, cities should assume local urban
services provided by special purpose districts."
The subject annexation and proposed expansion area are within Renton's Potential Annexation
Area and are within an area where the City is the designated sewer service provider and where the
City is currently providing fire suppression services under contract with Fire District 25.
Countywide Planning Policy LU-32. This policy states that cities may only annex territory
"within their designated potential annexation areas and that they must phase annexations to
coincide with the ability for the city to coordinate the provision of a full range of urban
services to areas to be annexed."
The City of Renton is able to provide a"full-range of urban services"to both the subject
annexation site and proposed expansion area at this time.
_--
1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055-(425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 R E N T O N
Y_ AHEAD OF THE CURVE
�r�:---------'-`--�,.,,.---.._�_�._-'-_-��..�.---'----'
Request for Public Hearing to Consider Expansion of Boundaries—Querin Annexation
O1/18/2006
Page 2
Countywide Plannin�Policy LU-34. This policy states that"unincorporated Urban Areas
that are already urbanized and are within a city's potential annexation area are encouraged to
annex to that city in order to receive urban services."
T'he inclusion of the unincorporated area to the north and northwest of the Querin Annexation
would result in a more practical city boundary and logical service area for the City. It would also
bring a full range of urban services to existing residents at a lower cost than what they are now
paying through property taxes and existing county fees.
Thank you in advance for considering our request.
Very truly yours,
�
G��
Kathy Keolker
Mayor
Enclosure
cc: Jay Covington
Alex Pietsch
Don Erickson
H:�EDNSP�PAA�Annexations\Querin�BRB Invoking Ltr.doc�cor
� . ,+ ---- ��,.�---�� ������rr►��1����- � ' ."'i� �' �
!� �• .�r �II������AII .:� �����i/�l���1��� ' �'��� ��,� �� �'._'.�
� I��1��I,�.V,L'L�Vvu �����►,u„�����1��� r�` �� � ;�� .,
► ♦1� � ��� �� ►► .r '�� I � ����� � �+
��1� �j� �i �������w ��� �1� �►� ��• �-�. v �� �1 �=�� '
��, ,1 �� h� �LlC�EI���' i, , , � �/IIII� � �.�tl t�, � �� �'i
�u��'a ii �� � Y���E���� ������� �i ��"• �IA ' ��
��i'�� .. �� �R����h�� ��■■ ��� R�/�w��, �,V����`��.ai �
• � � •� m� u�L�u�� �=—/� u��!l�Jt�u .11\ /'�� r� ��{!a,
�3��1 a� �,� � �C� 111111���1�� �1�� ��� �� �,. Q---
,�R�l���tl� �� ���� i ���� � �1 ��1�/► 1�� �-•���3�i�:�� </y— 7
��I�i'1����i/ �� �� ♦.� ' ■ � � ��� ■ �� � � � ��� �
� �.� �� ����/ �: ��� �� ;��.��� ���4 ��� r. �
c ��y���� �;r,�r �r����.�� �l111►<' ♦ � �i�► � � •
�������� �`����� � � ��+ �� ����� �� � � �
�►�����i��111��� _ � � � ��.,��,��� ryp� f • � �..�� �
���������!R��t�nl�i � � i 1 ��•,DG�i ��i�1� ,� �_��— �
�I��� 1l�f/y���� � � � ,i� ���� �r�i�11\ \: �:�•. ':"�I—�� �
��/������������� � �� � �
� �1 \► ���= �� �� ►�11�'�I� , `� �- ����.
,.. � � .'.■ --== ...�N. �� •.
' � � ..� � w � . :— •• v■■10 �
: �: •� �� -� x�.�� ■ , � •� �
- '�' �L� �� , . : .. �:T; Ij � ■ ,� �/ • ,.
_ � : I■ � , ,�' : ►
� .`
/� � ' ' t� : , ��i/ �' -
�/;� ���� .:�..
� Ir� ■!��� � ::■..i
� .■ ■■■
� r;� � ■ �,�����r,�•.• •■■.■ ■■■■�
! � � ■
=�' �: :�� " -� ���fl�t� ����ii� �.'
� �IiN�'ll�/ , I� F � � 'i :��
�i � � �_ , .r- .■.■ r�������������c3
� . � . . 111111111111�1�.I��E� � -
� ������ � � ,.��: ��r������ - �� �_��il����[�i� '
��►. � �� - ���■��..._
� = = �
���u '� �� '� i �'�,�,� � _
�' ` � � �III�IIii � .
�^������ � �j!�� ����������� ' , � �� �
�����3�� �� � � .. —"� ����'.�� �
� �� , -_._—_ ��.
��.� � �� ■�� �� ���II�i �� �
i�i►�� j� � � L �11��.L! � ., �11���1
�� . � '" � �
l�lll■� � � '�� ���
�� � � ������ �'■
�► ,I
�� � � • � c�a11111 � J
���/111111 ■ � �,� ■�� � ��
..• . . �� ��. . ■ ✓
-►��`� �� :: ■
♦ . �
♦ ,� � � �� '� �
� � � � � � � ,
�e� .
' � _ i Ii i �`� : _
ii���11�� Il�`�11�IIII`'`� �/���� --- �
�.► �� ♦ „ w���� �� � ..�
v�'��� % ='.�`� :� .�� ������� :�� _ ii�"_�
�. . . � 1 - ., �11�-
��I/11: � I/�� 11�� I����I� �� ■�i ■ p ���
j��l\� ��11�l� 11��11� -� � � : ::
�► � �� � � : �!� � ..
=►�111�► �' =' ������=���
�I�II/��I� ► . + ■�� � �
��.�� � - - - � ■� .. . . .
� ' � ' • � 1 : 11 • 11
:�:::
. .. �:,;<:,;:.>:,;.:�:;. � �,
• • 11
• . . �- - .� „ ,., � �
� � ' - - - iiii • � • �
�� •� , '
. � ��, �>> .�. -� .
R • �
QUERIN ANNEXATION FISCAL ANALYSIS SHEET
Units Po ulation AV
Existin dev. 3 7 $987,000
Full dev. 43 99 $19,987,000
Assumptions: 2.2 persons/household
$475,000 AV/new unit
$325,000 AV/existing unit
;j��y;��U��;:;:::::�:;:::: Total revenues
Existin Full Rate Existing::':::;:�:::':;:�;�3�i��6:
Re ular le $3,099 $62,759 3.14 Full :::::::'::�::$$��8{�>3�:
Excess lev $78 $1,571 0.07861
State shared revenues
Rate er ca Existin Full
Li uor tax $3.93 $27.51 $389.07
Li uor Board rofits $7.41 $51.87 $733.59
Fuel tax- roads $23.69 $165.83 $2,345.31
Fuel tax-arterials $6.47 $45.29 $640.53
MVET $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Cam er excise $0.75 $5.25 $74.25
Criminal 'ustice $0.22 $1.54 $21.78
Total $297.29 $4,204.53
Miscellaneous revenues
Rate Existin Full
Real estate excise* $48.57 $339.99 $4,808.43
Utili tax"" $133.20 $399.60 $5,727.60
Fines &forfeits* $17.53 $122.71 $1,735.47
Total $862.30 $12,271.50
" Per capita
** Per housing unit- based on $2,220 annual utility billing @ 6%tax rate
:��#�':`:':':::;:::::;: '':: Total ongoing costs
Per ca ita Existin Full Existing:::;:;:;s:::':':�;��;�3:
Contracted Services Full'::::::::�:::�fr��12,fi`:fi'I::
Alcohol $0.19 $1.33 $18.81
Public Defender $4.68 $32.76 $463.32
Jail $8.56 $59.92 $847.44
Subtotal $94.01 $1,329.57
Court/le al/admin. $66.92 $468.44 $6,625.08
Parks maintenance" $14.90 $104.30 $1,475.10
Police $276.89 $1,938.23 $27,412.11
Road maintenance*` N/A $0.00 $1,301
Fire"** $1.25 $1,233.75 $24,983.75
Total $3,838.73 $63,126.61
"See Sheet Parks FIA
'"'See Sheet Roads FIA
*** Rate per$1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) Net fiscal impact
Existing :::::::::::::s::::::$45�:63
F u I I :::;::::::�:':$�'�;.E�:�'$
;�Jn�:tiii�e:e`i3s�>:Parks acquisition &development(from Sheet Parks FIA):
Other one-time costs:
..................
Total one-time costs: '::::�::':::$2'Ux�94;1�:
Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo
.' .
QUERIN ANNEXATION -EXPANDED FISCAL ANALYSIS SHEET
Units Po ulation AV
Existin dev. 20 46 $4,602,000
Full dev. 90 207 $35,620,000
Assumptions: 2.3 persons/household
$230,100 AV/existing parcel
..................
$475,000 AV/new SF home
REvei�i��&:::::::::::::: Total revenues
..................
................ ..::.:.:.::::......:......
Existin Full Rate Existing:;::::::;::;�2;��2:.�:
Re ular le $14,450 $111,847 3.14 Full :;':;�:�:�$1����9:;5�;
Excess le $362 $2,800 0.07861
State shared revenues
Rate er cap Existin Full
Liquor tax $3.93 $180.78 $813.51
Li uor Board rofits $7.41 $340.86 $1,533.87
Gas tax- unrestricted $23.69 $1,089.74 $4,903.83
MVET $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Cam er excise $0.75 $34.50 $155.25
Criminal 'ustice $0.22 $10.12 $45.54
Total $1,656.00 $7,452.00
Miscellaneous revenues
Rate Existin Full
Real estate excise' $48.57 $2,234.22 $10,053.99
Utilit tax'"` $133.20 $2,664.00 $11,988.00
Surface Water Utilit $199.80 $3,530.00
Fines &forfeits* $17.53 $806.38 $3,628.71
Total $5,904.40 $29,200.70
* Per capita
** Per housing unit-based on $2,220 annual utility billing @ 6%tax rate
;�i��f�;;:':s::::`::::::::`:::� Total ongoing costs
Per ca ita Existin Full Existing;:;::::;:;�:�2:�;9:1�:�:
Contracted Services Full:��:::::$1����`4ti:;3�:
..........
Alcohol $0.19 $8.74 $39.33
Public Defender $4.68 $215.28 $968.76
Jail $8.56 $393.76 $1,771.92
Subtotal $617.78 $2,780.01
Court/le al/admin. $66.92 $3,078.32 $13,852.44
Parks maintenance* $14.90 $685.40 $3,084.30
Police $276.89 $12,736.94 $57,316.23
Surface Water O &M $3,808.00 $8,539.00
Road maintenance*" N/A $438.00 $3,650
Fire"** $1.25 $5,752.50 $44,525.00
Total $27,116.94 $133,746.98
*See Sheet Parks FIA
"*See Sheet Roads FIA
"** Rate per$1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) Net fiscal impact
Existing :'::::;::::::��;7?'�:5i#
Ful1 ::::�:::::����7;55�>61:
C�rte=fiii`�e:�ostis::;Parks acquisition &development(from Sheet Parks FIA): $56,233
Other one-time costs:
....................
Total one-time costs: :::':':`:::::$5�;��3;1��:
Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo
. .
-� Washington State Boundary Review Board
For King County
Yesler Building, Room 402, 400 Yesler Way, Senttle, WA 98104
Photte: (206) 296-6800 • Fax: (206)296-6803 • littp://wu�zU.�rietrokc.gov/crrirrexrrtio�is
February 8, 2006
City of Renton
Atm: Don Erickson, AICP
Senior Planner
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
RE: REQUEST FOR REVIEW
File No. 2222 - City of Renton - Querin Annexation
Dear Mr. Erickson:
Enclosed is a copy of a request received by the Boundary Review Board for a public hearing on
the above-referenced file.
The Board is expected to discuss the date for the Public Hearing at their March 9�2006, Regular
Meeting. If you have any comments to make regarding scheduling of the hearing, please
transmit them to this office prior to the meeting. You will be notified of the date and time of the
public hearing.
Sincerely,
� '�"`� �
Lenora Blau an
Executive Secretary
Enclosure: Request for Review dated January 18, 2006
cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the Metropolitan King County Council
Dave Williams, Records and Elections Division
Debra Clark, King County Department of Assessment
Lydia Reynolds-Jones, Manager, Project Support Services
Paul Reitenbach, Department of Development and Environmental Services
Elissa Benson, King County Office of Regional Policy and Planning
� -
�- �
; ��.�Y O� ' C�TY � ; REI�TOI�T
♦ �.
�� ♦ Mayo�
,�j� O,� Kathy Keolker
�'VT
January 18, 2006, � R�C����� ��E �
Judy Tessandore, Chair FEB � 2006 � 3 2�p�
Washington State �oundary Review Board -''�
WA State Boundary Review �i$tate Boun . �����`�
for King Cour�ty p,�ard For King Co. � 8aard For Km �:
Yesler Building;Room 402
400 Yesler Way
, S�attle, WA 98104
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER EXPANSIOIV OF
BOUNDARIES FOR THE QUERIN ANNEXATION
Dear Ms. Tessandore:
Pursuant to RCW 36.93.100,Yhe City of Renton is requesting that the Boundary Review Board
hold a pubiic hearing on the above referenced annexation to consider expanding its boundaries to
the north and west to create a more practical municipal boundary and more logical service areas. .
By invoking the Board's jurisdiction,the City is requesting that the Boundary Reyiew Board
make a finding in regards to this request within 120 days.
The City of Renton submitted the Querin Annexation Notice of Intent to Expand Renton's
" Corporate Limits by Anne�tion on December 23,2005,pursuant to RCW 36:93.090. �This was
, for a 7.3-acre area that normally,because of its size,would be exempt from a public hearing
befare the Board. The expanded area is approximately 24 acres and bordered by the City on b0%
of its perimeter.
This request is supparted by a number of the Countywide Planning Policies. These include:
Countywide Plannin�Policy FW-13. This policy states that `cities are the appropriate
proyider of local urban services to Urban Areas either directly or by contracY'as well as that
"within the Urban Area, as time and conditions warrant, cities should assume local urban
services provided by special purpose districts."
The subject annexation and proposed expansion area are within Renton's Potential Annexation
Area and are within an.area where the City is the designated sewer service provider and where the
City is currently providing fire suppression services under contract with Fire District 25.
, Countywide Plannin Policv LU-32. This policy states that cities may only annex territoty
"within their designated potential annexation areas and that they must phase annexations to
coincide with the ability for the city to coordinate the provision of a full range of urban
services to areas to be annexed."
The City of Renton is able to provide a"full-range of urban services"to both the subject
annexation site and proposed expansion area at this time.
_---
1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 -(425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 R E N T O N
AHEAD OF THE CURVE
This papercontains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer
�
� � Request for Public Hearing�.,Consider Expansion of Boundaries—Que. __ �_�exation
O l/18/2006
Page 2
Countywide Planning Policv LU-34. This policy states that"unincorporated Urban Areas
that are already urbanized and are within a city's potential annexation area are encouraged to
annex to that city in order to receive urban services."
The inclusion of the unincorporated area to the north and northwest of the Querin Annexation
would result in a more practical city boundary and logical service area for the City. It would also
bring a full range of urban services to existing residents at a lower cost than what they are now
paying through property taxes and existing county fees.
Thank you in advance for considering our request.
Very truly yours,
�
�
Kathy Keolker
Mayor
Enclosure
cc: Jay Covington
Alex Pietsch
Don Erickson
H:�EDNSP�PAA�Annexations\Querin�BRB Invoking Ltr.doc�cor
02/07/2006 TUE 16: 21 FAx a25a30�300 City Of ROntOn DS/EDNSP �002/Q03
122ECE�VE,C�
FEB � Z006
1NA State Boundary Review
Board For King Co. •
Qu�:�N n AN�vaEx,�►�[orr
LEGAL DESCR�''�'�ON
That poition of thc Northcast quarter of the Northwest qu�,rter of the Northeast qu�uter of
Sc.�;tion lQ,T�wntihip 23 Nvrth,Range 5 East,W.M., King County,Waslungron, lying
northerly oTthe sautii 9ine of tfi�e north 163-�eet o�the sout�i 1�a�f�112)thcrcof;
LES3 the west 30 feet thereof.
TOGETHER WiTH that Iwrtion of the Svuthwest quaiter of the Svuthc��st q�iartcr oti
Section 3,Township 23 Narth,Range 5 Last, W.M.,King County,W�.shing�un, Iying �
southwesterly,southerly and southwesterly of thc cxisting City Limits of Renton �e
� annexeci by Ordinance No.4092,and lying ea�terly, s�utherly and e�stet•�y of the existing
City Limits of Renton as annex�d by Orciinance No.402G.
f
,i
�
�� 1 --- i���.����� �r�ll/r',� �� dY� ��
C*i ''' �. � � --�v� i:Q �., '. ' �► r�
�'� � �,- �� ���� � .�
♦ ,.d� •�� r,,,�� � � ���tj ,. .
_ ��"�,,., �� ,�, �,
�� : n.�.,�E �� `,� -
, �
.i; � �;(� a j11 ►i'� � ���
1 .., �h ��.� r� ��a.
_• _ Q__
� :., � ' ''Z� �.N�',,��L'_ ��;.
„ � ,
�!r " `� '�,�" � • � � .; � �
�q ��
��� �� ��u'!� �'llli�� �•�►� � - r
� ����y _.._,.._ � " ��,�'�H�S �� • ri �
����♦ � _ � ♦ � ,�!-'�►�l�� �,'i i► • � � r,�-A
,�_,,,
�'���r. � _ � �lG �� �i�I� , � � �
� • :t�'J(i�t��H � � �I,►� ���1I1� N �:�,-� �= � '.
N�a" � �/` �1 " �/-- �� ���.'1:'�i a��i� II '',
� ,r � � �. � !� � � .,,,1
. , r, : '' � ` . ,� ` •
_ , �
♦ � ..
: � . , , �. �Y _
��• ■ 1, • • ,t
� '� �' • `
�/� � - • �
,,.� - �
•�-� � ..►
1�� ■��v �r �t :■ �r�
___ � .� ■
�� � ■ ii'�% �Ct��lii�►���� �. ��
%/////// � . �� :� ! � �� ����1�� +� ■
, � � :�� �►�filt�'t� ��/ii�l �
�ut�v�►�i(� :;%///////:� � :t� :�� 1/n
H��� - _ .��. �E� 11l111�8 �1�1i , .��� m�n��nc3
►�►i �"`.-.. ' '.� � _ 1iil�� /E� ��� ����i�`�� - �
ii� �� �'� ' � : � ��:.�:.,� ���� ������._._._
� " �III�Il1i� ,�__ _
/ .�I�f � � �J�� ///1/n/l/�i �
i��l�� �� �� ;,� � *�r -
� �� �! '��, � ��,
� � ��� ■ . - ' ' � �'.
�r�j� ■'�i �� �='��=� ■ �/����I
�III��� �11��.1! '�' " � � :
„�, ������ �i 'if�l(�,
r , .�► � ;
��� ■ � �■■i c•�: /U!! � J
r. �� n� � ��
-�►��� • �� �i � ■ r
� ��
� � i � �A �� '�
- •, �ii� �
� /i i . —
e��� ►����r:nrr .� �►� � � �
//II .: :i�� 11 ii� ���� �� � _:�
��' � �1lL� � �' � ��� ����
■ ♦ I/I,� �/� �/���� � —., �,,/�
�i� ��11��,�, ��„11: � ��i ■ = ���
1\� � � �� �e � : ::
�111►� � �� � � � �!/ � ::
�i/l��� -_ ���������L
t1�t�11� _ . ���i � �
— �. ■�, .. . �
! e ~ • • 1 : 11 . If
�:..:::�::.:�.:.
��::::>::.,:>:.;�;>.:..:�:::.;;:
. � .:.�.. ...............
.
............
./ �:�:::::>:;>;:::;.. R
` � � � � -=-
• • � � ►� �� ��� � .
= � • J
� '.,: � � %/// i � �
ti�Y o� City of Renton
� �% �- ♦ DEPARTMENT OF
� ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
��N��� NEIGHBORHOODS, and
STRATEGIC PLANNING Date: 02/07/2006
Sixth Floor
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
TO: Lenora Blauman, Executive FROM: Don Erickson, AICP
Secretary to the King County Project Manager
Boundary Review Board Merlino Annexation
Phone: (206) 296-6801 Phone: (425) 430-6581
Fax Phone: (206) 296-6803 Fax Phone: (425) 430-7300
ISUB.IECT: I Number of pages including cover sheet 3
REMARKS: ❑ Original to ❑ Urgent ❑ Reply ❑ Please � For your
be mailed ASAP Comment review
Enclosed please find a copy of the legal for the expanded Querin Annexation. Reggie has called about this a couple of times now
and the person preparing it was out sick. I will drop a hard copy in the mail tonight which you will probably receive on
Thursday. Please let me know if there is anything elese you need.
PS: We will probably not attend the meeting on the 9`t'but will be anxiously waiting word on when the hearing on the
Maplewood Addition/Fairwood Incorporation will be held.
���11�v��.
Ahead of the curve
�y ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
C�ti�; � �� NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC
' ,� "� ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT
��N�o�
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: January 23, 2006
TO: Tracy Schuld, Accounting Supervisor
CC: Tina Hemphill
FROM: Rebecca Lind, Planning Manager
STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson
SUBJECT: Querin Annexation Boundary Expansion
The City recently notified the Boundary Review Board for King County of the City's
intent to invoke the Board's jurisdiction in order to request expansion of the boundaries
of the Querin Annexation. The Board notified us that they had received our letter but not
the$200.00 filing fee(RCW 36.93.100). We are hereby requesting a City check made
out to the Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County for the amount of
$200.00 for processing the Querin Annexation requested expansion and public hearing
associated therewith.
Anything you can to expedite this would be most appreciated. Thank you.
Enclosure:
document2
Querin Annexation - Expansion
PIDS Parcel Size in '06 Assessed Value Owners Name
Acres
�-032305 9078 3.46 ac $119,000
-�-9119 1.11 ac $198,000
-�-- 9054 5.44 ac $423,000
� 9161 0.65 ac $332,000
{_ 9155 0.92 ac $212,000 James Rasco
9146 0.43 ac $237,000
9174 0.43 ac $237,000
9228 0.24 ac $107,000
9229 0.24 ac $81,000
9171 0.24 ac $230,000
9087 0.24 ac $254,000
9056 0.70 ac $310,000
9129 0.57 ac $350,000
9132 0.35 ac $257,000 Susan Kin
9143 0.35 ac $234,000
9131 0.57 ac $271,000
Streets (142°d Ave SE) 0.87 ac n/a
TOTALS 16.81 acres $3,615,000
� '� �r,
r�
� '' ,,, °/�1 ';!;
�r; t�t�.� ; ',k" 1 a':,
,
, � _____,,
r
'ftr �j /'(' ...� �;.
�j'�,:�.. .
,� �
,y .
��
-! Washington State Boundary Review Board
For King County
Yesler Buildifig, Roo�f1 402, 400 Yesler Wcry, Seattle, WA 98104
Phone: (206) 296-6800 • Frrx: (206) 2.96-6803 • http://zvzvzv.metrokc.gov/nnriexntions
January 11, 2006
City of Renton
Attn: Don Erickson, AICP
Senior Planner
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
RE: REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION TO LEGAL DESCRIPTION
File No. 2222 - City of Renton - Querin Annexation
Dear Mr. Erickson:
Enclosed please find a copy of the letter from King County engineering staff reviewing the legal
description submitted with the above-referenced Notice of Intention.
We are assuming that you will be in accord with the recommendations made by County
engineering staff and are continuing to process this file. However, if you should disagree with
the requested corrections, please notify our office immediately. Any questions regarding these
recommendations should be directed to Nicole Keller, Road Services Division, at (206)296-3731
Please send a copy of the corrected legal description to our office as soon as possible. We need
to have the corrected legal description on file prior to issuing a letter of approval. Also, please
be advised that the corrected legal description must be used on all future documents related to
this proposed action.
Sincerely,
Lenora Blau an
Executive Secretary
Enclosure: Letter from King County Road Services Division, dated January 10, 2006
cc: Lydia Reynolds-Jones, Manager, Project Support Services (w/o enclosures)
Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council (w/o enclosures)
FORM 7
� 1�:ECEI1��;; �"�
King County JAN 1 1 2005
Road Services Division N{p State Bcundary�?e����ew
Department of Transportation Bosrd For King Co.
KSC-TR-0231
201 South)ackson Street
Seattle,WA 98104-3856
January 10, 2006
Lenora Blauman
Executive Secretary
Boundary Review Board
YES-BR-0402
RE: Citv of Renton—Querin Annexation BRB File 2222�
Dear Ms. Blauman:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the legal description for the proposed Querin
Annexation to the City of Renton transmitted with your December 27, 2005 letter.
Staff reviewed the enclosed legal description and found it to be satisfactory and complete,
except for one minor correction. It is in that portion of the Northeast quarter of the
Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter(not the Northwest quarter) of Section 10. With
that correction, the legal description will be complete and may be finalized.
When reviewing legal descriptions for annexations, staff attempts to identify islands of
unincorporated County and/or marginal road rights-of-way that may have been overlooked
by the City in developing the legal description. For this particular annexation, the submitted
legal description did not exclude any islands of rights-of-way.
This annexation does not include a portion of a County park.
If you have any questions, please contact Nicole Keller, Vacations and Boundaries
Engineer, at 206-296-3731, or via e-mail at Nicole.Keller@metrokc.gov.
Sincerely,
�y„ �.Q�'
ydia Re nolds-Jones
Manager
Project Support Services
LRJ:NK:mr
Enclosures
�.�,=o=M
; �
Lenora Blauman
January 10, 2006
Page 2
cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the King County Council (w/enclosures)
Paulette Norman, P.E., County Road Engineer, Road Services Division
Nicole Keller, Engineer II, Engineering Services Section, Road Services Division
-� Washington State Boundary Review Board
For King County
Yesler Building, Room 402,400 Yesler Way,Seattle, WA 98104
Phone:(206)296-6800 •Fax: (206)296-6803 • http://www.metrokc.gov/annexations
Deceznber 27, 2005
1����T'��D
DEC 2 8 2005
K.C.Roads F.ngineering
TO: Ms. Lydia Reynolds-Jones Services
Department of Transportation
Manager, Project Support Services
KSC-TR-0231
FROM: Lenora Blauman, Executive Secretary
SUBJECT: File No. 2222 - City of Renton- Querin Annexation
Enclosed please find the legal description and related Assessors map(s) submitted to our of�ce as
part of the above-referenced Notice of Intention. We would appreciate your reviewing the legal
description and reporting your findings and recommendations back to our office.
The copy of the enclosed legal description is for your use and files. It would facilitate
processing of revisions to the legal description, however, if you would return a copy of the legal,
with any notations you choose to make, along with your report. We would appreciate your
response within the 45-day waiting period, which is expected to end February 6, 2006. The
deadline for requesting that the Board invoke jurisdiction and hold a public hearing can only be
changed by a revision to the legal description or modification of the original Notice of Intention.
The support and expert assistance which you and your staff provide on legal descriptions is
essential to Board processing of proposed actions. Please let us know if we need to provide you
with any further data.
Enclosures: Legal Description/Maps
R.S.V.P. January 27, 2006
FORM 5
. � , . i
RECEIVED
DEC 2 3 2006
Exhibit D WA State BOundary Reviaw
Board For King Co.
QUERIN ANNEXATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of
Section 10, Township 23 North,Range 5 East, W.M. King County, Washington, lying
northerly of the south line of the north 165 feet of the south half(1/2)thereof;
LESS the west 30 feet thereof.
FILE N0. 2222 - CITY OF RENTON - QUERIN ANNEXATION
� .
� REC IVED
�
- C 3
e d
gC
V\�
� 5e
>
�
�
z
�
�
� Q
0
_ .-�
�
T St
9t
Querin Annexation �`°����=���
��,�.�Y�...�
Exhibit F1: Proposed annexation boundary 0 400 800
Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning
.��♦ Alex Pietsch�Administralor
G.Del Rosario 1 : 48 00
12December2005 FILE N0. 2222 - CITY OF RENTON
- QUERTN ANNEXATION
� '
� == Washington State Boundary Review Board
For King County
Yesler Building, Room 402, 400 Yesler Way, Seattle, WA 98104
Phorie: (206)296-6800 • Fax: (206)296-6803 • {tttp://wzvw.metrokc.gov/nr2riexntio�ts
December 27, 2005
Ciry of Renton
Attn: Don Erickson, AICP
Senior Planner
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
RE: SUMMARY
File No. 2222 - City of Renton - Querin Annexation
Dear Mr. Erickson:
Enclosed is the Summary prepared by Boundary Review Board staff for the above-referenced
Notice of Intention. The Summary will be sent to the Boundary Review Board members, along
with the Notice of Intention, as part of the agenda packet for the next regular monthly Board
meeting.
If you see any corrections or clarifications which should be made in the Summary, I would
appreciate hearing from you at (206) 296-6801.
Sincerely,
Lenora Blauman
Executive Secretary
Enclosure: Summary
FORM 11
PLEASE DETACH BEFORE DEPOSITING
CITY�fJF RENTON,WA 98055 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK N0.243901
iNVCkICE N11M9�R DATE OESCRIpT10N P.O.htUMBER OISCtlUNT AMOUN7
BRB QUERIN A 12/13/2005 BRB FILEING FEE FOR QUERIN ANNEXAT 0.00 50.00
.
, .h '
� ��
�/
o� dJ RECEI T N° 56266
'p ��� ate � —J
� � � V
� Received From
vyi '��� � _� , Addres
� ���3� ' c� (�� � J� � �j CI
a ��� �
�`C Q �c���4 Amount
� rn c m�`�- �"3 � /V .�i�r�s^
�� � �x� � Cash '' � `—,
Y� `�° ��� �� , � � ��r , � ��� =�N
z � � Check
O � � ference
O C �
� = Other �Y:
rn �
Q 3 ,✓ Signature
50.00
' SUMMARY
FILE NO. 2222 Thomas Guide Map No. 626
Date Received: 12/23/05
Date Distributed: 12/27/05
ENTITY City of Renton
Date Filed:
ACTION Petition for Land Annexation
Expiration 45 Days: 02/06/06
TITLE Querin Annexation
Board Meeting: 01/10/06
Location The site is located on the east side of the City of Renton. The
southern and western boundaries of the site abut the existing City of
Renton.
The southern boundary of the site is generally formed by SE 144tn
Place (if extended). The western boundary of the site is formed by
Hoquiam Avenue NE.
The northern boundary is formed by SE 112thth Street and the
eastern boundary is generally formed by 144th Piace SE (if extended.)
Land Area Approximately 7.3 acres
Land Use Current: 3 single-family homes
-�----_
Future: Approximately 43 single-family homes.
Population Current: 7 persons
Future: Approximately 99 persons
Assessed Valuation Current: $987,000. ,
Future: $170,200.00
County Comprehensive
Plan Designation Urban Residentiai Use (4- 12 dwelling units per gross acre)
County Zoning R-4 (4 dwelling units-6 dwelling units per gross acre-with bonuses)
City Comprehensive Plan Residential Use-Low Density
City Zoning Residential Use - R-8 (Maximum 8 dwelling units per net acre)
District Comprehensive Plan City of Renton Comprehensive Water&Sewer District Plan
District Franchise No franchise is required for service to the Querin Area.
Urban Growth Area (UGA) The site is located within the Urban Growth Area as identified under
the State Growth Management Act, King County Comprehensive
Plan and City of Renton Comprehensive Plan
SEPA Declaration The proposed annexation is exempt from SEPA pursuant to RCW
43.21 C.222.
ENTITIES/AGENCIES NOTIFIED:
King County Council Member(s) Reagan Dunn
King County: Clerk of Council, Department of Assessments, Fire Marshal, Health Division, State
Department of Ecology, Puget Sound Regional Council, Municipality of Metropolitan
Seattle (Metro)
Cities: Not Applicable
Fire Districts: King County Fire Protection District No. 25; City of Renton Fire Department
Water Districts: King County Water District No. 90; City of Renton Water Utilities Department
Sewer Districts: City of Renton Sewer Utilities Department
School Districts: Renton School District No. 403
SUMMARY (File No. 2222)
The City of Renton proposes the annexation of approximately 7.3 acres, known as the Querin
Annexation. This annexation was proposed under the 60% petition method, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.
Renton City Council adopted the petition for annexation in November of 2005.
The site is located on the east side of the City of Renton. The southern and western boundaries of
the site abut the existing City of Renton. The southern boundary of the site is generally formed by SE
144th Place (if extended). The western boundary of the site is formed by Hoquiam Avenue NE. The
northern boundary is formed by SE 112thth Street and the eastern boundary is generally formed by
144�h Place SE (if extended.)
The unincorporated area is included in the "Annexation Element" of the City of Renton
Comprehensive Plan and is located within the Renton Potentiai Annexation Area. The proposed
action is consistent with City of Renton Comprehensive Plan policies addressing annexation, including
those provisions which call for inclusion of urban areas within the City together with protection of and
provision of services to incorporated areas (e.g., LU-1; LU 37.3; LU-37.5; LU-36; LU-41, and LU-42).
� The Querin property owners are seeking annexation in order to develop properties under City of
Rento � d to receive public services (e.g., sewer services) from Renton. Presently the
area includes approximate ive single-family residences. The City of Renton proposes residential
zoning at R-8 (up to 8 dwelling units per net acre) in order to achieve urban densities and efficiencies
consistent with adopted Countywide goals and City policies for urban growth. At full development,
Querin would include a total of approximately 43 homes which would house approximately 99
persons.
The City of Renton has planned for growth at this level of urban density and has established
standards to guide ongoing uses and new development on the Querin properties following annexation.
More specifically, the City of Renton is prepared to provide development review based upon local
standards and applicable King County guidelines. Similarly, the City will provide environmental
review to the annexation area based upon local, regional and state regulations for protection of
environmentally sensitive areas (e.g., sloped terrain, vegetated areas).
The City of Renton can directly provide (or contract for) urban services to the area. For example,
upon annexation, the City will provide the Querin Area police services. The City and Fire Prevention
District No. 25 will provide fire services and emergency medical services. The City will also establish
storm water management system requirements for the Querin Area. The City of Renton and Water
District No. 90 will continue to provide water service to the Querin Annexation Area. The City of
Renton will provide sewer services to the Querin Annexation Area.
City and County library facilities, law and justice facilities, and parks and recreation facilities (slated for
improvements)would be available to the community. Children would attend schools in Renton School
District No. 403.
The City of Renton reports that the proposed annexation conforms to the State Growth
Management Act (RCW 36.70A.) For example, the annexation is supported by RCW 36.70.20,
which requires community planning goals, for urban growth, services and infrastructure, and
environmental preservation. Additionally, the application reportedly is consistent with RCW
36.70A.020 (1), encouraging development in urban areas where there are adequate public
services. It is also consistent with RCW 36.70A.020 (12), which calls for public services to
support permitted development. Annexation would also permit urban growth — and protection of
environmentally sensitive areas — as envisioned in the Growth Management Act.
r
Further, the Querin Annexation is reported to be consistent with the King County Comprehensive
Plan. Following are examples of King County Comprehensive Plan/Countywide Planning Policies
that are addressed by the proposed Querin Annexation:
FW-13:Cities are the appropriate providers of local urban services to Urban Areas.
LU-31: The County should identify urban development areas within the Urban Growth Area.
LU-32: The County should encourage cities to annex territory within their designated potential
annexation area.
LU-33: Land within a city's potential annexation area shall be developed according to local and
regional growth phasing plans.
U-203: Population growth should be encouraged in Urban Growth Areas.
U-204: The County should support annexations that are consistent with Countywide Planning Policies
and the State Growth Management Act.
U-208: Land capacity shall be provided for residential, commercial and industrial growth.
U-304: Growth should be focused within city boundaries.
The proposed Querin Annexation is reportedly consistent with the provisions of RCW 36.93 (Boundary
Review Board Regulations). For example, this annexation would be consistent with Objective 1,
which calis for the preservation of neighborhoods. This area is linked to Renton by geographic
features social fabric(e.g., similar land uses, open spaces, common terrain features).
Similarly, the annexation would be consistent with Objective 2, which calls for the use of physical
boundaries to demarcate an annexation area. For the Querin Area, boundaries are primarily formed
by roadways and by existing City boundaries.
The Querin Annexation would also be consistent with Objective 3, which calls for creation of logical
service areas. Local residents have petitioned for annexation in order that all services and land use
regulations affecting their area may be efficiently coordinated by a single local government unit. The
City of Renton is prepared to govern and serve the area.
The proposed annexation is also reportedly consistent with Objectives 4-7, which call for the
achievement of reasonable boundaries for a jurisdiction. While the proposed annexation is small in
size, the area lies within the Renton PAA and so this incorporation is consistent with City plans to
govern and serve the area. This annexation would also be consistent with Objective 8, which calls for
inclusion of urban areas within municipalities.
The City of Renton has conducted fiscal analyses related to the proposed Querin Annexation. At full
development, City expenditures are estimated at $62,311 and revenues are estimated at $71,658.
Upon annexation, property owners will assume their share of the regular and special levy rate of the
City for capital facilities and public services. As such, the City will have sufficient funds to serve the
area at present without a significant impact on cost and adequacy of s�rvices, finances, debt structure
or rights of other governmentai units. Future capital needs and costs will be examined and funded
through the Renton Capital Investment Program.
The City of Renton supports this annexation in order to serve citizens of the area. New residential
development and coordinated services would benefit the greater Renton community.
�/'LY�N
T
��.`�Y o� CITY OF RENTON
♦ � '} ♦ Mayor
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler
��N�o�
December 13,2005
State of Washington
Boundary Review Board for King County
Yesler Building
400 Yesler Way,Room 402
Seattle, WA 98104
Subject: NOTICE OF INTENTION TO EXPAND THE CITY OF RENTON
CORPORATE LIMITS BY ANNEXATION
Dear Board Members:
As required by Chapter 36.93 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW), the City of Renton
hereby gives notice of intention to annex territory hereafter referred to as the "Querin
Annexation." This annexation is proposed under the 50/50 method in accordance with the
applicable provisions of Chapter 35A.14 of the RCW. This annexation would incorporate into
the City of Renton approximately 7.18 acres of territory for the provision of urban services.
To assist in your consideration of the proposed action, the required articles and exhibits are
enclosed and numbered in accordance with the Board's suggested format. The $50.00 filing fee
is also enclosed.
Should questions arise during the review of the information and exhibits provided with this
Notice of Intention to Annex, please feel free to contact Don Erickson, Senior Planner, at (425)
430-6581.
Please send notices and other communications regarding the proposed annexation to:
Don Erickson,AICP, Senior Planner
Department of Economic Development,
Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning
City of Renton
1055 S. Grady Way
Renton,WA 98055
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
� �`�;�-�, -���
��
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler
Mayor
1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 -(425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 R E N T O N
AHEAD OF THE CURVE
This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer
. �
;;, CITY OF RENTON
„p, Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Alex Pietsch,Administrator
May 23, 2005
Mr.John Sweetman,Director
Accounting Division
King County Deparhnent of Assessments
500 Fourth Avenue,Room 709A
Seattle,WA 98104-2384
SUBJECT: CERTIFICATION OF PETITION TO ANNEX-PROPOSED QUERIN II
ANNEXATION;A-05-003
Dear Mr. Sweetman:
Enclosed, please find a petition form and accompanying documentation that together comprise
one 10%Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Petition. The request to annex to the City of
Renton, a code city, is made under 35A.14.120 RCW. The Petition is transmitted to you for
certification of sufficiency under the applicable sections of the RCW. Your office previously
reviewed a similar annexation under this name but it was for a larger area in the same vicinity.
A map displaying the subject site is included as part of the petition. If you have any questions or
require additional materials, please do not hesitate to call me at (425) 430-6581. Thank you for
your attention.
Sincerely,
v
Don Erickson,AICP
Senior Planner/Strategic Planning
Enc.
� 1055 Sout Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N T O N
�This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer A H E A D O F T H E C U R V E
- r
��— —� � - -I — i
, �----� -T-
� � � �
_ ------ � � � ' �
� ��, �o � i
� --- , � ---� �
--T------,---- _�. ,
� i � I
� ''
.�.
' `�� ��
,---� �
�, � o
�' `���. �co � 4
� I
a \ i � Q �
� � ❑
� � o
❑ ❑ o
❑ � r�❑ - - ❑ �
C� � � L�j ' � ` �' a
� � �
�� .� O i
� - .�,.
❑
� - �
� C�
� �
� � �
�� �� � O
0
� o �
o ,
�
�- �
o �
z �
0
This documsnt is a graphic repraaentotion,not guaranteed
to wrvey aecurxy,Intmded for city pwpoxs mly and
baaed on the best infortnation owiable as of the dote ahown.
This mop Is for Gsploy purpoaes only.
Querin II Annexation o Zoo 400
Figure 3: Existing Structure Map 1 : 2400
Gti�Y „;, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning '� Existing Structure
� � ~ Alex Pietsch,Administrator
G.Del Ro�ario ""' ""�' R2I1fOt1 CI�/LIf111fS
�'ANzo 4 May 2005 0 Proposed Annexation Area
,. P.
QUERIN II ANNEXATION
PID Name Addaress A�s�sse�Va��r+� Acrea e
102305 9367 Hill,Jay PO Box 507 $58,000 0.40 ac
Renton,WA 98057
9312 Hayes, Gordon PO Box 1088 $58,000 0.40 ac
McKenna,WA 98558
9002 Kenny,Martin 18719 Yew Way $170,000 2.20 ac
Snohomish,WA
98290
9144 Broyles,Wm 11224 142" Ave SE $276,000 2.13 ac
Renton,WA 98059
9399 Querin,Verdie 11236 142" Ave SE $248,000 1.99 ac
Renton,WA 98059
9218 Schwiesow,Robert 11246 142" Ave SE $177,000 0.18 ac
Renton,WA 98059
�'�'RCa�y�x"��.R' +:r z�^�...,,�
�
t
Annexation Review Form , ���''� 1 � ���� ;
[X] 10% Notice of Intent ( ] 60% Annexation P�����'��'3`���' ` ` ���,� �
.�... ��.,�.'r v... _._..:�
TO : Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM : Don Erickson (x6581)
Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . Querin Annexation
Location : This�roposed + 10.14- acre annexation area is located between
142" Avenue SE on the west and Lyons Avenue/145th Avenue SE,
if extended, on the east. It is bordered by SE 112th Street, if
extended, on the north and approximately SE 114�h Place, if
extended, on the south.
Date Circulated: October 13. 2004 Comments Due: October 22 o Don Erickson,
EDNSP)
General Information
Area : 10.14 acres
Street length : N/A
Assessed Value : $1,299,000
Estimated Population : 13
Current Uses
Residential : 5 dwelling units
Commercial :
Industrial :
Public :
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family & Residential Low
Density
Future Uses: : +47 Single Family Dwellings
Future Po ulation • + 117 residents
, —�`
Reviewing Department/Division: /"�-✓-�l'1 �J �'� � ;�� • ( '
�
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
department/division? �
��
�.;;� � C� � � C� ��
±;�!}
�,,-��
'�f � OCT 13 2004
t'I fY i,r rtiE N TON Over
F�i?_ : ,,itil;.t��JT � )
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area?
�
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
�
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any
other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
JUL���
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed
by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this
annexation? � /(
f�
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services?
(If yes, please indicate on the attached map.)
�
General recom endation and comments:
�`
r,, ��
Signature: �(i�� - �' Date: � �
Annexation Review Form
[X) 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60°/a Annexation Petition
TO : Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM : Don Erickson (x6581)
Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . Querin Annexation
Location : This�roposed + 10.14-acre annexation area is located between
142" Avenue SE on the west and Lyons Avenue/145th Avenue SE,
if extended, on the east. It is bordered by SE 112th Street, if
extended, on the north and approximately SE 114th Place, if
extended, on the south.
Date Circulated: October 13. 2004 Comments Due: October 22, 2003 (to Don Erickson,
EDNSP)
General Information
Area : 10.14 acres
Street length : N/A
Assessed Value : $1,299,000
Estimated Population : 13
Current Uses
Residential : 5 dwelling units
Commercial :
Industrial :
Public :
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family & Residential Low
Density
Future Uses: : ±47 Single Family Dwellings
Future Po ulation • + 117 residents
Reviewing Department/Division:
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
departmenUdivision?
(Over)
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area? � .
�=,,/C.� C��x_ �I// Q/�� ti,^-- ���`-��`' d'�G/�/h�.,�..�<,,�-s-�
� �`� �� ����
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any
other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed
by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this
annexation?
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services?
(If yes, please indicate on the attached map.)
General recommendation and comments:
Signature: Date:
i
' Annexation Review Form
[X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition
,� :��>;z>k�..p.
- �4'u�` "'�:ieif�aw'h:�tiS�i,,.,r�;�-.
TO : Building �� " "'^��� ` -
Fire ater Utifity ' ` M��
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM : Don Erickson (x6581)
Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . Querin Annexation
Location : This�roposed + 10.14- acre annexation area is located between
142" Avenue SE on the west and Lyons Avenue/145th Avenue SE,
if extended, on the east. It is bordered by SE 112ih Street, if
extended, on the north and approximately SE 114�h Place, if
extended, on the south.
Date Circulated: October 13. 2004 Comments Due: October 22,
2003 (to Don Erickson, EDNSP)
General Information
Area : 10.14 acres
Street length : N/A
Assessed Value : $1,299,000
Estimated Population : 13
Current Uses
Residential : 5 dwelling units
Commercial :
Industrial :
Public :
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family & Residential Low
Density
Future Uses: : ±47 Single Family Dwellings
Future Po ulation � + 117 residents
Reviewing Department/Division: SURFACE WATER UTILITY
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
department/division?
The proposed Querin Annexation is located in the Honey Creek sub- basin of the
May Creek basin. The upper most reach of Honey Creek flows through the eastern part
of the site. Erosion and flooding is an existing problem for the Honey Creek sub-basin*.
King County Wetland 6, a sensitive area, is located 300 feet downstream. This wetland
has suffered some degradation due to the road construction, illegal dumping and buffer
reduction. Honey Creek, with its associated wetlands, and its forested buffers needs to
(Over)
. ' be protected in accordance with the sensitive area regulations regarding wetlands and
stream buffer standards.
We recommend requiring use of the 1998 King County SurFace Water Design
Manual level 2-flow control and basic water quality treatment for any new development
within the proposed annexation area, or the City adopted standard at the time of
development, if it is a higher standard that will better control the quantity and quality of
storm water runoff from new construction within the proposed annexation area. A
wetland report should be required for any new development application within the
proposed annexation.
*See May creek Conditions Report, Aug. 1995, p.9-40, 9-41.
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service
provision to the area?
Runoff from SE 112th Place flows onto the annexation area east of Honey Creek,
from an outfall pipe onto a 33% slope, which is an erosion hazard. No other drainage
structures exist on-site. The eastern half of the site is moderately sloped on both sides
of Honey Creek.
Downstream, Wetland 6 is sensitive to and has seen some degradation due to the
existing developments surrounding it. Flooding downstream of the annexation area,
along with erosion, fish habitat and passage problems, and poor water quality are other
deficiencies in the Honey Creek sub-basin. Portions of Honey Creek downstream of the
proposed annexation area are underground in pipes.
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical e�ension of services provided by
your department/division?
The proposed annexation represents a logical extension of surface water utility services.
Future storm drains would discharge to Honey Creek.
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you
identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
When the proposed annexation area is developed additional public storm systems will
be constructed that will increase the Surface Water Utility maintenance needs. This will
incrementally require additional resources for maintenance of infrastructure from this
annexation, other annexations and new development within existing City limits. At some
point in time additional resources will be needed for maintenance due to new development
and annexations.
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or
managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required
as a result of this annexation?
We may become responsible for the outfall into the proposed annexation area from SE
112th PI. It is unknown at this time if it is a county owned outfall or a privately owned storm
' w system. Additional information is needed to evaluate the amount of future storm systems
that would become City owned, and cost associated with their maintenance and operation.
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City
services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.)
The proposed Querin Annexation boundaries are satisfactory.
General recommendation and comments:
The annexation area drains to Honey Creek. Downstream is a class-2 wetland that is valuable
for wildlife habitat, provides some peak flow attenuation, and improves water quality. Honey
Creek contains trout and salmonids and drains into May Creek, which also supports fish.
Honey Creek is susceptible to erosion and flooding, which is in fact occurring in the present
state. The erosion is impacting fish habitat and is caused by increased runoff due to
urbanization in the Honey Creek sub-basin. Water quality in the basin is also degraded. Future
programs and projects to address these problems may be required.
Future development should be held to high environmental protection standards guided by the
May Creek Basin Plan. Future development in the proposed annexation area should be
required to comply with the 1998 KCSWDM standards and provide level II flow control for storm
water detention or stricter standards if required by the City at the time of development.
NE 11�' Ct. is on the southern boundary, newly constructed as part of the Brookfield II Plat
immediately to the South. For this plat, the City of Renton stipulated a Level 2 flow control
facility with basic water quality per the 1998 KCSWDM.
�
✓+ ��
. `
�
Signature: '�C %� Date: ��/�� Q�
L/
� .
�6E��'�V�[�
��'� ��2004
Annexation Review Form �ITY OF RENTON
UTILITY SYSTcMS
[X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition
TO : Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM : Don Erickson (x6581)
Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . Querin Annexation
Location : This�roposed + 10.14- acre annexation area is located between
142" Avenue SE on the west and Lyons Avenue/145th Avenue SE,
if extended, on the east. It is bordered by SE 112`h Street, if
extended, on the north and approximately SE 114th Place, if
extended, on the south.
Date Circulated: October 13. 2004 Comments Due: October 22. 2003 (to Don Erickson,
EDNSP)
General Information
Area : 10.14 acres
Street length : N/A
Assessed Value : $1,299,000
Estimated Population : 13
Current Uses
Residential : 5 dwelling units
Commercial :
Industrial :
Public :
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family & Residential Low
Density
Future Uses: : +47 Single Family Dwellings
Future Po ulation • + 117 residents
Reviewing DepartmenUDivision: ���/��,���
1. Does this annexa on represent any unique or significant problems for your
department/division? �`Kd �lSL lC/ C/
� /���=�� � i��i���j����l�
(Over)
�
2. Are �u aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area? L!�����7� ���v�'�!�/� ,� �Z�T�lr/r��i'�� • �Y�cT�C�l�77�
/���o,�iry ����d� s�'�� � ' ��,-
3. Does this proposed nnexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division? �.�5 `� ��`;���� ��r;��
/
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can ou identify any
other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? ���'�� /5w
l
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed
by another jurisdi�tion?, Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this
annexation? ��/� �,/
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logi I annexation for provision of City services?
(If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) `,��
General recommendation nd comments:
o �5�/� ���
Signature: Date: l�
� ��������
. . �C� a�2004
Annexation Review Form �►TY oF R�N,�o,�
UTII.ITY SYSTclVIS
[X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ) 60% Annexation Petition
TO : Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM : Don Erickson (x6581)
Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . Querin Annexation
Location : This�roposed + 10.14- acre annexation area is located between
142" Avenue SE on the west and Lyons Avenue/145th Avenue SE,
if extended, on the east. It is bordered by SE 112'h Street, if
extended, on the north and approximately SE 114th Place, if
extended, on the south.
Date Circulated: October 13. 2004 Comments Due: October 22, 2003 (to Don Erickson,
EDNSP)
General Information
Area : 10.14 acres
Street length : N/A
Assessed Value : $1,299,000
Estimated Population : 13
Current Uses
Residential : 5 dwelling units
Commercial :
Industrial :
Public :
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family & Residential Low
Density
Future Uses: : +47 Single Family Dwellings
Future Po ulation • + 117 residents
Reviewing Department/Division: Vv� �(1�'S`� '�IG�I�,,u(�
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
department/division?
�� �
(Over)
!
` • !
N
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area?
��o��s�d a�nn exal�o�, 15 ui� � �,a�� �rs� � arP a � K.0. (u .D ���'� .
�Q�le�a,nY S� c�r�l'aa� l�J D +� �I� �✓ �J a�e/ �r�ui�a��G�j �r K���— .
i
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
r
�o�( r��ica�,� _ �rn.c�Aho►� Z W'� }Pn�� uJ .�- aU S c�ru►� cv►rca. ,
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any
other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
�a� �r��� _ �,��- � � �� .
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed
by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this
annexation?
.� G Y e��►� � r�c� �b ass�� 1�CcN� �, R f� s w a Vc,, s� �'�--
� , 0
t���.,�, C,� s l��1� a� ��� � �� � • � G •
U1�D ��0 (�b�j rnoV hal�. q �a„cl,�s� � ak ar`� �1
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more lo ical annexation for provision of City services?
(If yes, please indicate on the attached map.)
NO
General recommendation and comments:
_ � �,�c���/ (�r.a� cc�h Yx dV bJD ��10 a �b�� � (.�r h'�1 ca� � �-�✓V'�
��
������� .
— �u� �-C Gt'9 � q 0 �(t ar di r� ��M� �I r�an�� a n�n. � ,
� � U
IS6'06- S� 12� 6'`�
�n� ��- �8� �'i
p(�c,:—C6w� 1'(c,�� . �aN��
Signature: ��w✓ ��'�/ l�-�'?��� Date: _ �� 22, `kru�
1�1'Qr� �U`�'1 ta�t�+� �'v�.�.�s�✓
.. 4.: ke 4 k L ,.
• • 4/�ai d ; �'. �«�.r��e�
Annexation Review Form
�1 ii.. I;• " i i r� .,-
C7,•J,.� D,V,,.,! .
[X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition
TO : Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM : Don Erickson (x6581)
Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . Querin Annexation
Location : This�roposed + 10.14- acre annexation area is located between
142" Avenue SE on the west and Lyons Avenue/145`h Avenue SE,
if extended, on the east. It is bordered by SE 112th Street, if
extended, on the north and approximately SE 114`h Place, if
e�ended, on the south.
Date Circulated: October 13. 2004 Comments Due: October 22, 2003 (to Don Erickson,
EDNSP)
General Information
Area : 10.14 acres
Street length : N/A
Assessed Value : $1,299,000
Estimated Population : 13
Current Uses
Residential : 5 dwelling units
Commercial :
Industrial :
Public :
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family & Residential Low
Density
Future Uses: : + 47 Single Family Dwellings
Future Po ulation • + 117 residents
Reviewing DepartmenUDivision: /4L.,��- .
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
departmenUdivision?
�f�
(Over)
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area?
��
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
csNK.
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any
other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
��/o,�e
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed
by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this
annexation?
(J Nl�'.
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services?
(If yes, please indicate on the attached map.)
�./J���
General recommendation and comments:
a �
.
Signature: �' Date: %G��/ U y
. ���
• • OC e� ���4�,S I
Annexation Review Form �S?�, ��
T�a�; Oj
S���rdtr �
[X] 10% Notice of Intent [ j 60% Annexation Petition °''sysre
m.s o��
TO : Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM : Don Erickson (x6581)
Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . Querin Annexation
Location : This�roposed± 10.14- acre annexation area is located between
142" Avenue SE on the west and Lyons Avenue/145�'Avenue SE,
if extended, on the east. It is bordered by SE 112�' Street, if
extended, on the north and approximately SE 114`h Place, if
extended, on the south.
Date Circulated: October 13, 2004 Comments Due: October 22, 2003 (to Don Erickson,
EDNSP)
General Information
Area : 10.14 acres
Street length : N/A
Assessed Value , : $1,299,000
Estimated Population : 13
Current Uses
Residential : 5 dwelling units
Commercial :
Industrial :
Public :
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Family & Residential Low
Density
Future Uses: : +47 Single Family Dwe�lings
Future Po ulation • + 117 residents
Reviewing Departmen ivisio : TvaKSvor't'�a'�'tok $�vs`E'e�s P�vtsron
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
departmenUdivision?
No,
(Over)
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area?
yes. Rega�ch, �aqura,r+� AveHue NE �¢ZNd,4v�pue SE�a bu�iH� �li.e p�/�ose�
2Kti�x,�tfloK �v�d lroadway �ave�eti7�' uJ<<l'flr as�d fl�ick��sS �(e �o-�-t�eef' �'��
o�F R���iw s�akdz,�s�a!s� c us�6i9�t�`�rN s�d�cvalks�a�d s7�e� /�l�fi'�, a�� �-Pws7'��;
LlFyradiN9 0� 6�y4�a� q,v�Ku� �v� �kd 1aca( Z c�e S wcfi�,ik flie NNex�foLl d(rCd We4�
J�e a�-�li�e vcp�N,se o{e�us-ErK�����a��e�s a��-.��aew���/opKeK7
3. Does this proposed annexatio rep ese t a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
yes.
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any
other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
Add��ho�al -ftra�spm,�t��iak s�zf"'�F�.✓o�.cl��6e t�q�r��e�! u��v�d,ks fi�PwB�d+�eNue�1l�'
ab�'�K9+he � e�an�►exafleti Zv�ea �d Kew /ecal ��sS UJrf��k �� d�rkexa'fan a�a
n�eef'i� ���yo�Re�laH sf�wd�•�ls tv�u/d 6e a�-�i� e�yk�.se e�c��s�i•, ou►her�s
a�or.�u,-h.t�'e h�ddr/op�ra�t ,9��Y
C-n �yy �s�s a:soua-�"�d ,f�tiew '�` l� fi� a�rcl �« f J'���i �zakf Ka�ce m�'
sF� s�g�s�4�, lKdP�ve�Hea�,,,���nJ� y ��{,, ould�+e,7'�ataf'r•rz.�rs! br�t�h.
5. 1��w1c1 iTie�Ci assume ownershT r e��bi i or faci ities curre'Fit�owned or mana ed
�Y P'� p Y g
by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this
annexation? /
�l� /^�dr�/9 v�ill�a��p a�►�es�oo�sr6��l�r �y-'�'ZC�(ifes.
�(/'e� r�9ardr� k��J a�v���c�.��'s a� -�'ZKcGI l,Ses_
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services?
(If yes, please indicate on the attached map.)
�,e �p o� �aV� ahy L�K�erKS d(l�� I'tie ,6oukc�a�•r� ds
cu►-r�nf�y p`�►°s�d.
General recommendation and comments:
1"�t� T�aaspd►-�`z�ioK �ys fc�s D�►v�sra� d�s ��ia�� a�y
�cc�evKS r�9aFd�K �,vti�� �i�s p��oSe�1 �ukexa75ati
a�oes o� �a�s `r o7�occ_c.t�.
Signature: 1���''�� Date: �b���J�4
Tr�ta.s�r'F�(-tak Srs'f+r�w.5 DlY�s�op
�evcGt�s �yorcFl h8�l�
. . .
Donald Erickson -Re: Annexation Inquiry Page 1
From: toan nguyen <anandtoan@yahoo.com>
To: Donald Erickson <Derickson@ci.renton.wa.us>
Date: 04/26/2005 11:34:57 AM
Subject: Re: Annexation Inquiry
Dear Mr. Erickson
I would like to submit the RAINIER as the name of the annexation. The contact person will be myself. My
day time phone number is listed below. Thanks.
An (Andy) Phung
425-342-0387
Donald Erickson <Derickson@ci.renton.wa.us>wrote:
Dear Ms. Phung,
I will begin putting a 10% Notice of Intent petition together for you.
But, first I will need a name for this annexation, and the name and
phone number for a contact person. If you can get me this information
in the next day or two I should be able to something out to you later
this week.
Thanks,
Don Erickson
425-430-6581
»>toan nguyen 04/25/2005 11:21:13 AM »>
Dear Mr. Erickson,
Thank you for your response. Please send the forms to my address
listed below so I could apply for annexation.
An Phung
PO Box 854
Mukilteo, WA 98275
Donald Erickson wrote:
Dear Mr. Phung,
As we discussed a couple of weeks ago there currently is a proposed
annexation to the northwest of your site, which you are not really
contiguous to. In our departmental discussions we have anticipated
expanding this annexation to include your property, the Cam West
properties to the north and other residual properties over to the
Urban
Growth Boundary later this year or early next year. Actual annexation
would be three to six months later.
An alternative course of action would be to do a smaller annexation of
your property and the two parcels south of you. This area is would be
approximately 10 acres in size and presumably could brought into the
City in eight to ten months, assuming there is support from the owners
�Donald Erickson - Re: Annexation In ui � Page 2 .
to the south of you.
If you are interest in pursuing this alternative please contact me at
425-430-6581 or my email address-derickson@ci.renton.wa.us and I
will
get the necessary forms ready for you. Unfortunately, we do not allow
applicants to apply online but the good news is there currently is no
fee for annexations. The process, as I previously explained, takes
anywhere between eight and twelve months depending on the number of
property owners and whether the Boundary Review Board will require one
or more public hearings when they conduct their required review of the
proposed annexation.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Don Erickson, AICP
Senior Planner/Strategic Planning
EDNSP Dept.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Donald Erickson - Re: Annexation In ui �� � � � � � � � � Page 1 a
� , , ��.f,,,�,�,�� /� �'C�
From: toan nguyen <anandtoan@yahoo.com>
To: Donald Erickson <Derickson@ci.renton.wa.us>
Date: 04/25/2005 11:21:39 AM
Subject: Re: Annexation Inquiry
Dear Mr. Erickson,
Thank you for your response. Please send the forms to my address listed below so I could apply for
�
-----._�
An Ph[r�ig"
PO Box 854
Mukilteo, WA 98275
Donald Erickson <Derickson@ci.renton.wa.us>wrote:
Dear Mr. Phung,
As we discussed a couple of weeks ago there currently is a proposed
annexation to the northwest of your site, which you are not really
contiguous to. In our departmental discussions we have anticipated
expanding this annexation to include your property, the Cam West
properties to the north and other residual properties over to the Urban
Growth Boundary later this year or early next year. Actual annexation
would be three to six months later.
An alternative course of action would be to do a smaller annexation of
your property and the two parcels south of you. This area is would be
approximately 10 acres in size and presumably could brought into the
City in eight to ten months, assuming there is support from the owners
to the south of you.
If you are interest in pursuing this alternative please contact me at
425-430-6581 or my email address-derickson@ci.renton.wa.us and I will
get the necessary forms ready for you. Unfortunately, we do not allow
applicants to apply online but the good news is there currently is no
fee for annexations. The process, as I previously explained, takes
anywhere between eight and twelve months depending on the number of
property owners and whether the Boundary Review Board will require one
or more public hearings when they conduct their required review of the
proposed annexation.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Don Erickson, AICP
Senior Planner/Strategic Planning
EDNSP Dept.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
A�
' ;,, � CITY OF RENTON
„u Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning
K ta hy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Alex Pietsch,Administrator
November 16, 2005
Virginia Broyles
11224 142"d Avenue SE
Renton, WA 98059
RE: Querin Annexation Rates Inquiry
Dear Ms. Broyles:
Thank you for attending the public hearing on the Querin Annexation on Monday,
November 7, 2005. My department recently received a referral regarding your request
for additional information on City rates versus those in King County. I understand that
you spoke with Don Erickson of my staff after his presentation to the Council Monday
night about the City's utility rates and 6% utility tax. He told you he would do a breakout
of the taxes and service costs for utilities for your property. This work is now completed
and enclosed with this letter.
As you can see from that analysis, you would save roughly$148.00 per year based upon
your current Senior Exemption Assessed Value. Also, if your utility costs for telephone,
electricity, cable television, gas, or water are lower than those shown, the savings would
be even greater, since the City's 6%utility tax is based on the total combined amount
spent annually for these services.
I hope this helps to answer your questions. We have also included a copy of the Renton
Annexation Report,which answers other questions residents often have regarding sewer
hook-up, garbage collection, school district boundaries, etc.
If you or your family have other questions, please feel free to contact Don Erickson,
Senior Planner, at 425-430-6581.
Sincerely,
���
Alex Pietsch
Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Administrator
Referra105051-C
Enclosure
c: Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer
Bonnie Walton,City Clerk
Don Erickson,Senior Planner,EDNSP
1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N T O N
�This papercontains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer A H E A D O F T H E C U R V E
A
�
COUNCIL REFERRAL TO ADMINISTRATION
TO: '' Alex Pietsch, EDNSP Administrator DATE: 11/8/2005
FROM: � Bonnie Walton, City Clerk LOG#: 05051-C
On 11/7/2005, Council requested the following:
Provide annexation and utilities cost information to Virginia Broyles, 11224 142°d Ave. SE,
Renton, WA 98059 (Querin II). Pietsch � �-�-'—?
Please respond as follows:
Prepare memo to Councilmembers via Mayor. (After Mayor's approval, Mayor's
secretary will copy for Council and Clerk and return copy to you.)
Prepare memo to Councilmembers via Mayor and include attached letter with memo.
(After Mayor's approval, Mayor's secretary will copy for Council and Clerk and return
copy to you.)
XX Prepare letter(s) to citizen/agency with department head's signature and submit to
Mayor for approval. (After Mayor approves the letter, the Mayor's secretary will mail it
out after making a copy for Council and Clerk and returning a copy to you.)
Schedule matter on Council committee agenda. Arrange with Council Liaison ASAP.
(Copy of response to City Clerk not required.)
Other:
PLEASE REFERENCE LOG NUMBER ON ALL LETTERS.
Please complete request by(11/22/2005). Thank you.
cc: Jay Covington
April Alexander
Don Erickson
Estimated 2005 Utility Rates for Typical Single Detached Dwelling in Renton's
Incorporated and Unincorporated Areas
(for W.M. Broyles Property)
ANNUAL COST EXAMPLE
TAXES & FEES COUNTY CITY
Annual Property Taxes $1,571.75 $1,491.65
($125,700 Assessed Value) (Levy Code 4342 @ (Levy Code 2104 @
$12.50395/$1,000) $11.86676/$1,000)
Annual Utility Fees
Surface Water(City @ $8.50/mo.) $102.00 $64.68
Wastewater(City/Metro @ $39.03/mo.) $548.94* $468.36
Garbage Collection(City @ $13.44/mo. $255.60 $161.28
for 1 can)
Telephone (Bill: $30/mo. or$360/year) $21.60**
Electricity(Bill: $80/mo. or$960/year) $57.60**
Cable(Bill: $40/mo. or$480/year) $28.80**
Gas (Bill: $50/mo. or$600/year) $36.00**
Water(City @ $25.83/mo. or$309.96/yr. 0.00***
for 3/4" service)
Sewer(no charge if on own system) 0
Total: $2,478.29 $2,329.97
EXAMPLE OF ANNUAL SAVINGS $148.32
(With Senior Exemption)
*Outside of City Rate is 1.S times City rate, not Metro processing fee.
**6% Utility Tax
***Water provided by existing out of City provider.
MONTHLY UTILITY RATES COMPARISON
Kin� County City of Renton
Surface Water $8.50 $5.39
Wastewater $45.16 $39.03
Garbage Collection (1 can) $21.29 $13.44
Telephone, Electricity, $0.00 6% of Monthly Bill
Cable
Street Lighting Charges Yes None