Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA-17-000023_REPORT 01Renton Special Care Community 17033 108lh Avenue SE Renton, WA 98157 Site Plan & Conditional Use Submittal Materials JAN 1 ll 2017 40. Plan Reductions (8.S"x 11") -------------- -----. -----~ • NYld 11/S ';';086 VM 'NOJ.NJcl 'JS 31V HJ.BOt ffOLi AllNnr.ir.ioo 3HVO 1VI03dS N01N3l:I :m 'Allr1nr1rroo 3llVO 1VI03dS NOlN31J UOl 'll A~\fnN\fr ! I fi Cl) C • I I ii!l UOIJ!?:>JlddV Ma!Aa~ UEld 9}!S ' C. C 0 w 8 •• aa 11111 fl ;l u-I t 0 0. .... «:<>< 'r/M ·uciue~ 35 anua~';'~l80( £COL\ " . ~t' II! I At!UnWWO:) C ,e ..J ' ' ' :l"' ,,1. ~8 aJe:) 1e,oads uotua~ ; !;!1 ' HOG 'U ),.l.:fVnNl1T UO!lE!:l!ldd\f M8Jl\8~ UBld 8JIS VM '001uac1 3S ~nuahV ~!SOL !;~OLI f;l1unwwoo aJeO 1e1=>adg UOlUa~ I -Jlh1d xz/1 ' 'l ' " Ii ~ ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! l i l ! I ! l I , l . ! f Iii! !i'l ! l I I I I l I t . ! i , '1-·'Jl! i l 1 t I l i 1 l !!0®®0@088 5, ,, o, l t !I ! ' ' ! ! !' ,I ~ ; ' l ; ll ' . i s • ' l f I ' I ii ' I ! f I' ' ' I ' l i I I i j i l j j l j l I ! l • ' I l ' ! l l 8 e l ! ! i I l i lo Q;J o ollo ~ 0 0 0 i , r1 • "-w 0 l ~= I • • N ' "• • ~Cl _J ' ! .. ]~ j H~t .J ---1 j ~I --» -· -~ N\fld 311S i ~ LSH36 VM 'NOlN3~ i ~ 3S 3nN3A\l 4180L £WU <{ AJ.INnv,ivm:i 38\1:J l\ll:J3dS N01N3cl , - --.,,.,,,.00,,,,..,,,,,,,,,.,,,,.0,,.-.,,1~ ""'''" 3S 31\V H180~ r --Ef:l I ~-- s -~ -G y ' ·\ 11 / ~ '" 0 z I:' I w '" • _ II I I II I I I z ""I I :L I I ~ w ' l~tj ~ ' -----~ - 0 ~--------- (C1 fw""', 'i') (f) (.w's ·r ,w, "r "~, ~ i 1i ~ o ~--'~ I -·. ---u---r=;;~~~ . . 'r [==i 1: i 8 ~ I • I i . I ~1 1 , ~1 M < < -i-r i~-·· ---,---,cc(~) r'oi· \_-.!,·t-r . .,/,/ ' J::lJ ' I . -............... . I '\ ,,, ' . !;J= u= , .... ii I -) I ,S'l) I 8-· ' ' i. (j]) ·ii,, ~ lg @';-.:/ ~i .. ·-· Im.· / I .• i_L_, • !, I .. ·-0:·. / ~ ~ I"-• I ' · .. ~ ': ' ' (8 i '," I :11· -:-l1 I .,-.,.....,J UO ' .• c I ,,;i~: -, I'' ' • --r'1 .J~r , ____ "'" ~ : glr,; " p --,,,' i~! ·.J~~I~,: I : I 112'·11'1 ~ ~·r - .~ "'"I' '!§iii -:',._ : : LI~ '" ~ I~"'~§!,, ,.,,.,,,.J rt.: mi~ . .!it i '--·· 'I --- 1 !··-·" I I I -" . " , , , ....... r --B-, 1 ,I /~) I I -LI =-+' ----'l""-' ~=----::"·":" =-~ lg, •. ,,,. ,,·., 114" ~· ' ''-"" ;lo . \9) IR) "l;ro·1 0 ® <~) " ~ I~ ' hi'\ -'([_) ·~ ~ (W) /~) •g )> ~ N ~ RENTON SPECIAL CARE COMMUNITY 17033108th AVENUE SE RENTON. WA 98157 FLOOR PLAN COTTAGE B ~::::::....-· t~ =1'1! ia ~~~ i~ :;g -..... . ~ t I' 'I' I! ; 1~ ~ i ~ [fil "· ...., I~ ~ m ·< ~ I . )> ~ N N (~ ; '1~ 'O ~ ~ I~ 0 ~ ~ r (o\, = > --z (()\r 1 \.':'.'.J ' rc,,_ '-.'V (j) ~I Cf (~ Q/ ·1 ,------------~--~---- I I ' --T LL u···" ' ! I i Jo's "J T !IC I I -- raD ~ l ' I I I • I , , "'~ itlt~ 1 ,~i1:..a-, .. &~'-J. 1]~:;1 \~:·¥1~~-/' --; '~-~_-m,t ... _=_~ -·· -~~!_,~ ;:; --:/ -, ", II IL.,.. _, ..... \- I l ' tE 'TI" I ~~,~! I"~ l== --~'if ,1 ~8~ 'l:::::: I'_ !1:";.1-§ •, --z._~ 7, ' I ~ I I • ~l -~ ·~, c ' ._!J, I ' 1 .-"[•, ,~-1 tr @J,~ I '1--- ' ,. 111:: r-~ ;-di T\' ~11 . . Hi l "'-"''-"I .u .. ;,,_~, --,;;t . . ' ' • ' ,,,i -.c= \,sc.;8 ' . . . . - --- {O\ \ __ -/ Q ,6',i'l \ . ~~ l i- ~ :-:·:~ --~---- .,-,..-.. ,: / =l..Cqj . . I.'= I , . ,,l ~ : / i _[ L l' ~ --~ : \,_, ,') .'a0ii ~ ,--,;--\ 9-_j:=:!~ r I' . , •• 'I -~;/~l= I , I ~i,•e . --~J1it II, -~-..... 1 • \> §ill" I" ', '§1: --' -;,.a--I ."li l:t z ~ [:_~ ' . ' ; ,. ~l-:r-rJ ~~i-_; ' ' --~ -, ~ < • <-CrWM u~ --- 1'=' !~ . ~::€1 --- ----, , ~' •, i _ . .Jfz1t · ,' .,1,··~--'TJ I S!~ ~ : ,~,wuo ,--r•j, I>• r;h' <a== \:1{' I ~ ~. )1 •2· - CV-~ --- ~fl : h~ I --l TTI="=[.:-~ ~G! - ' {.... IW ) 'I , tf •t; l-+ lcc,J u~ ,;s:~a-i>--~':;'a~f I ,, 6===rl f-- F-I I I I I 00 ~ I ~ I f! I ll1 I • --® ~Ll 'l.°'.I __ = . ' e--:"-~ ---I . ',oJ / ' '--..__ =,.,-.,~· ---·--/ -4---,,, ll, !_ •. _,. ----Q 11 !} 0 m 4D RENTON SPECIAL CARE COMMUNITY 17033 108th AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98157 !~=;_( 'll Ct ~; + z J~ ! ffl ,, 'I 'I, 2 16 ; j ~ rc:1 :;; 1.5.11 ! '"'"""'°' "''"-'"'c"'-='"""rn"-/Fif?/ I ff?": FLOOR PLAN COTIAGE C j"' ' '-~=· C '< 0-~ )> ~ "' w c--\ ~ ~10 0 ~1: ; z n 0 ~ ~ ~ n m 0 V • •• I I .. I I . ' --~ / S·::O··--• / ,f---'-· -··-- @ ® ® -~r~ , l ____ ··-: =,--, --~---I/ ------------,-. ~ l I '---1~~_::__--: __ -~---1---_J \ I --/§f'I \._~)---, ~ : '-.j @) i ' 1'1 ~I) l -- ' ~ ' ~ I 1 ' ,_ -----,,- ~ ' I r;i I~ I',._ • i (,I~ 'i'I! • . ·ri ~ .... f -,k' :ip= ~l~f ·--~~;) /- LJJ il,i, ~~)= i!j'9!el§ '. 'I l 1 . ·"!• "b .. -:i_J~""'.;---§ ·--· ~ ' -' ' . ' , I 11,1! I -~ ' 'DI ' :i,,i I 1 I ,-+---ii~ !' ·'cf', --;~~m~l:/r'T~l.'~Y -~--. --ll'"" . : 'jt I~~ .--· .1k_ ; I (J) : • ~,r. . -,r;1i. , . ~'·!~-: \. t.i :: ,~-...1---...i .. ,- DJ! ' L! ~ .. '€'' I -.\ '1, : m' ,_·._ / I )i~i••·· ~FTII ~ 1:;;i:E"lJ I . ~ (!: ~-..,-c~-- ' 1 ! i 11 .! I I,• . ' li • D~ fa '-le t=r .,r : U£ bi .ff ! i • ~Ii J~ ~ ~=-=. =i-h--h"' "\r_ : ' _),111 l I I I rr! -F i~,-. (~ ·m[ • ·1, .. LJ .\ l,_!lj[ t-O'-O"CLEAR ~ i-,--• i -·i·->. I @i (;J u I I r I,.._,. \. - )(~11. ~ ~-it-1{, : J; ~/ ' I I) ' ~ ,11 ····.. , 1hi~ cJf hrnf .;.J , ,-;.i1r, ~ :>.r .. 'ij!~.: ' ' ii,, l1Z-11 ._ .. ---' I , ' cc--, : ~j1~t '; I I : . . .... I ' -L \ ' ........ ~, ' r-_, __ _J Y,~ ~J))~ • G··"'· <1,~r . -' , "\f fl!~ • ---~:= -.,,... I cgJ-I , -~ -;--, ---s'J I ' -1, .. (.J) RENTON SPECIAL CARE COMMUNITY 17033108th AVENUE SE RENTON, WA 98157 FLOOR PLAN· COTIAGE D ~ ' ' (it) (®" ___ ; ___ @ ~ '~~ i~""" m 1 . 'fc,...,, ~§~ 2 t~ ;~p f . ! ' . ' 'l 1IT'"'I ~-r-:;'11' i ' .. ~~ .. 1:~;:;:;,. ~L.5.1 ~ . . ~--.. -"' I 3 ~ \r.f~ .'_ ~ '.?:-":1 ,., ' \_:...c:: -·' ::i, ~ N .i:,. (-) ,_ ~ <: 10 0 ~ "I;::! > z > 0 ,~ !Z y c;-1 T' ~~ ~r ' ' I I ~_--r------~-------r~~~---------r-1 I I ='f41 I I 1( ' (t)---:-- (t;"'r--~ ~ :'./ .------r © ~- ~~i ! ~CJ <>(;t<> <J'~\>- _-,i tj:i.'"' Q--~~~ - rll:J n I gr:J'~ _, ' ~ I~ ~~'j'\ -~"'le> t- '1,f-~ il,Jj f<tJ~~ 'll(CJ 0)--~-· ' ' ~--L----J[/ I ' I I I I ~ ' I ---r-, = A:'! -~d <• ~B~!I D _,_ -, ' _L __ '-C ' ' r-----1 _J __ ~ ' ' I ' --{(: j_) ~ --<ID --{J) -(~) i ~ -~ ~ ~ I ~ --~------, I . @--~-+----~-~ ,I , , ' I ' -<TI) , ·_ -. -----¥r~'-j I · .. 1 ---_,_ ----1 r-: ---,---C------i~ EJ,,,,, I (~ RENTON SPECIAL CARE COMMUNITY 17033108th AVENUE SE RENTON, WA98157 FLOOR PLAN COTTAGE A I 8 '"--·--="""' I: \~~ ,>.,...w '!~ ._,,, H1 I-f m ~~~ r' "; , ii, ~ ~ -/.. ----------t e{J B 'I' ~ r::;·( ! ~1.5.11! .~· ... !·-- (~7· \ ·~lf_;~-.' ;,' :i r• -I,......::: :-' ---------- ----- ' ' dVWJJ/dVIJ!JOdQl ff086 IIM 'NOJ.NJtl 'JS 3M' HJ.f!Ol ffOLt A.llNnwwoo 3llVO lVI03dS NO!N:ll:I :m 'A!IWnWWO:J 3}N:J lVl:J3dS NOJ.N3ll ~ g z t w w ~ Jill j I If 11 I I j ir i IP J : " j I I • • 11 . ' 111111·1 I ·111 g ll .lLOl 'n A~NW' UOUE!:>UddV M&IA&}:I UBfd &IIS 'tM'LKII~ 3S"1J8.0.Vll80Ltt0H ~i1unwwo::, aJe::, 1e1oads uoJua~ l j l j l l I ' ' ' ' ' I i . !1 111 I lj I : I · 1 l1 I· I 1, ' '1 i' Jf. ,'!!'" I ' J I . ll t, I .• 1 . I I• 111 l I I Im' ! I ltU! l h I I.• ,!1 il/ll . . . .. • • ' . . ' • •• • • J '! I I l I 11 11 . . ' . . . . . -.. ' ' .. : • • • ' . • ' ... •• . . ' . I I l ' ' ,,, l I I I I I . . • I 1 ! J • I • ' --. . .. " • t I I 11 I . . ' . ' ' ' . ' -: / ((, /i I I ,1 l l JI l ii l . . • • i 11 . • '' • • I . !I ' I 11~i -,l 11!: ' ' ' I j I J 111 Jl ! II iljl ilj ll!l I fl 11 • • m·11h ·,·1 Ii tj l I I JI H I • I I I ' . ' ' . ' ' . ' ' ' ' -·-_., ...__,.., .. • -~ a :Ja1 Wk/ Sll.Jl7llJJ (JlZ{MJ]N3!) qf.086 VM 'N01NJ/:/ 'JS 311V H180t ffOLt A!INnt\lt\100 3ll\fO 1\ll:>3dS NO!N~ :m 'A.Ut'lnt'IV'IOO 3llVO 1'1103dS NOlN3lj i::~,:-:-~~'c;-~·: .. , ,, , .S ,) I' ~' ··j G..:::,,__'..:::,.~~J j; Wk/ 10IJ1N(XJ J!JVNM/{} C,<;086 \fM '././01N38 'JS ]!IV H1801 ffOtl A!INnwwoo ~ 1VI03dS NOlN:nl Oll 'Alll'lnl'll'IO:l 3HV:l 1Vl:J3dS NO.LN3H .... 9 - 0 ! a: I -•·\"'"'' ... "' ----;~-I. i ·····1 -D11· -il 1;·1;1~H!"111I 11111!1Pl!1'llliilll 11° im1~1 i!1111·1 i111'lf lti:11 !l: ( l:!1~!1 jl I i : : ~ 111 ! l! II !I I '/ i, ;i -· d II • ! ! 11!,,-. ' ,, ·1 ,!., -,,,,,,, 'I' ' "''' g !ii!~'l!l•N \ ,-",---, i f, ·-~ ,srr ,•,". J-i ici 1 t111§ + I +</ ' j~ 1-I l ilM 1111 111, 11 ,1 11 111 · 1111,1;11 111 I I ! ! --! ! I ··:--" "' I ···-·1111••11m1,g11 ~s~~~~~ iR'AiR ~iiH ~~ ,i I ~~ l!i:i i iR"1iJI ~; ;; l"'g.C!:!1j:', f i 1: ·: !'''!• -:1 !1 I s f 'l'i'I i! 11 i!i", 1•. •,, I'll! ' -' 'm .. 1111 1m1111 1 11u1,:1 ' ¥!!·' f!11,·'1 1'!1! 'l!!!i !11 ,:~,1 ,111·1 .~· 1 • l! 1 al 11 .--.. ' .. ~ ..• ·1·1·1 j 11 /-1 ,1•c'· .... ~lee I '.'. ~ a " ·1 · •"' t . 1~ ··1 :JV -.. ~--r' •\ I r ·I ' i! !! ' i ! l . ' ' l / ' I' ,/'\ ~ ,.,,~.., -.-:.... ------. .,_. r ,, c• .\J--~' / f'.'7 • _/ .. _ ,t ~ --'"~, ~ v/ $~~ !·(: ~ ~ ,! i,1 it'"' -!: ! i~L/----~"-g~ Ii~ ::~~ /~~ I Cli": '1~)' ~'i}'i _, 1·> ~~ 4,,,. "'\-- 1 7n.JV{R,) ', . "'~'--->u<-. ;!J~-.-- ' RENTON SPECIAL CARE COMMUMllY, LLC RENTON SPECIAL CARE COMMUNITY LDC ~ ;; ~ ·. ,-' ~ --.; ~-\~. 'J 8 ~::o ! ·'.' /'''o ' ' . _,_ ,_, ~ ::o~! 1i n,_. ~ ':"i ---. ~ , §;; C)Oi ::~~~i ::1 ~ s:~i ).j: ;i: ~n,; . (i) ~C)~ ! '-, .r,, L' ~"~~"'\ _/.~ :ti ....... :ii-~ ~ --\, ) " ·" "'.j I""~ ii ; 1,):: ::-i ::t,.. ~~'-~1 /1 ~ '"""I L.-"-~J '-r..: -........ ...... \j_ r ~ I ! ~·=---Z~ '1l"-'~ . ,. Q -™'"' " 170JJ IOBTH AVE S[, RENTON, WA 98055 CONCEPnJAJ.. GP.AD/NG PlAN _,.._.. ... ...._._ ------ ,,,.1ST_tl~- Voo.1• ~ ~-;;== TYPICAL FENCE & TRASH ENCLOSURE DESIGN AND FINISH / • 111 m• _:Ii· Jn L 1:1i1111i11l l!!II, ;• , I ~1~\ii I i , . i8 = ' '' ~-""" G)-~,~.E_v~~i-oN AT TYPICAL FENCE -COTTAGE A & B_SHOWN r-\"-~~.:."'" '"' 1 ········· t _ ---· __ i I . :rn IW_l1@ __ 1L1 ,_jj·. 'ii! ,;;,i1 U Mi 1m1-_.I I !]lj[l\l'.lllf!]IJ]ii .l:tlili 11 • '-,,oof£.,c, G)~~.~s~:{NCLOSURE ELEVATION NORTH (s~t~~--o~NCLOSURE ELEVATION WEST /~~';';,:;~~,"''"""" ~!T .. c+,C,"W""'C'C<' • '---"-"'"" ... ~ /":) TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATION so_u_TH ~ ,,,· l'-0" (0--~S~ 0 ~N(LOSUR_E ELEVATON EAST / G· ·Q t TRASH ENCLOSURE /\ / "' /'"\ = 1 i,,-'~---·-'-··1 ,I ' I (~Y$, ·~·· / :. ' ' : l.1 -',; ·• ,-' '. ' .~l~·,i;~~-: _ _:_-~;_~::~, ...----------=-. . --- 8 ~~ 4 ~S~}NCL0SURE ENLARGED PLAN SITE KEY PLAN ~ --&I . - ' i I '' ' i I I ' !; p I d q j ; ~.;;----·--_,,, 5216 lfilJ JcJLscu/Fcy AR<'.lltTLCTUR( ll. PlA~Nll>IG '7C0LfAR'iWAY~E REDMOND, WA 9B:>52 """'"""' f!OT,,.9"E"OL',A"(""' ..-.«· "" '""'"""""' ..COCf'<"-'"OW,- 0 MAGNET .... ...,. __ ~ "' i z i z 0 ::, j::: ! ,, <' ,, > w 0 _, () w w w "" Cl'. "' "' t'i w~ Z. _, ::,~ '.S ; ~ z~ 0.. wro () >"' w w <<t Cl'.. 0.. .ss ::, "' ro ~' z oz 0 ~o t-~ ... u. ' z Mz w. w OW t-. Cl'. C: a'. iii ' I. A;~~--I -------Renton® NOTICE OF APPUCATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) ... M-~plknb,OU-flladandO<COP!od"'lththo~Olllof~&-~ ICEOI -~ DM11<wi 1111"" or,GI -Tllo klllowinsbfl.ity dldatbM .... """1btlon 111d thl-..,. P<ll>llcA!>Pr,rnb. illlllt Of NOTICE 0fAPl"l)C,l110N: Fol>Nl,v l, 2lll7 ~UKNUMIElt: L.IJ.f,17-!JOOCl23,UF,S,1,-A,OJ.H PROIECfN.o\llllE: Ccttqn Spedal Canl """mu,ity 1,nu•ryl.9,2017 Fobn>IJ"jl,21117 M'Mc.l / MOlflri Dalin 6 ~......V1£ll 15° ,-,u11,o Ull/ -.. w ... ,u19,1 mr,..,.,...-m,/ kftir41.......-i<Lmm -1sa.o.1-.~-~--,_ Dulld"'"°"'""ean.v,,,cdon P ... lt, FIN- 0,-,~Rwpor\G-!calA""""' U..ii,:.p,,~~ - o_.,._,.<11~&-'*~ICED)-Plonnlntl ~---Otyli.t.10S$5autl, OtadyW .. ,11-, WA IIG51 ryou w,:,uld ,._ ,a oo ,,,..,. , .,...., of ,..om"''"""""' huther lntaonatiOfl an tt,b ""'pa,sod pn>jet1, """plot,, u,~ iorm ond mum"'-Otyol ~""'""· CfD-Ploonl"' Olvl!lan, lOSS so. Gn.t,, w,~. -n,n, WA 981JS7. N•m,,., .. lk>c Cot!-Speml Q(a C<,nmunl!y / lUA•UIIIIJCll. Eel', SA./,, OJ-H , ---Kenton® AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, I 1. I, hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted in _,__u conspicuous places or nearby the described property on Date:._ct.~/U-----+-~11..__ ___ _ Signed: ~;u; ~ STATE OF WASHINGTON [/ 55 COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that _.s1 1 • ( l TI,·~ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/tiar free and voluhtary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. "'"\\\\\\\ I 11 D~~ ~~&~k 2 Joi~ ___ 0 "--'J/-'-'-''=tf;,'±· --""-'-""' .. ""~~....._ ___ _ f 0N~-~~"'.::•,~..3'~ 1 Notary Puh1Tc· ·and for the State of Washington -o,-_,'li • • :(o,··~ ~ ~· ::: ::r:?. 0 ~-1-'to\ ~ -::: ~.a, "' ~ -,,,,, ..,, ~o • -~ Z ::;:;. ~ ~u (J i O ::: .,. ~ '°oe"""" "\ ; 1,:;, -1~ iJ't }.1\ 8. 29 .. " .$'_£: c, E /, ..:;, ,,, ~ ....... ~ - '°It 1 )-. ... :'lH\\\\""'""i ~ ~ 11 11 ·,:,·OF If,/~<;, $° 111 ~ .......... 1 I 1\\1\\\''' Notary (Print): My appointment expires:_ --"'-A"-'"""_'J.,.::ei...cc.\~f .... --_..a.;)"-;:t...,(~7'--_ _..i J .. 1_+ __ . __ _ J Ill uw~-vuy U.L 1'.'0lUUll "'-'lllUI r lilllllt:f J ding@rentonwa.gov February 13, 2017 Land Use#: LUAl 7-000023, ECF, SA-A, CU-H Cottages Special Care Community We would like to express our concerns with the proposed parking and traffic design of the Cottages Special Care Community and how it will impact the surrounding single family neighborhood. The existing conditions of SE 172nd Street on the south border of the proposed development should also be noted. The description on the Notice states that a driveway will be located at the west property line and connecting with SE l 72"d Sl A commercial driveway located next to our single-family residence to the west will have a negative impact on our property in terms of noise, pollution, and lowered property value. Additionally, a traffic study should be required to determine the impact the driveway will have on the added traffic to SE 172 St. The existing sidewalk and curbing on the south side of SE 172nd, west of I 08th SE and fronting the daycare center, are located in the center of the street right of way. The placement of these obstructions to traffic occurred in 1990 when the area was unincorporated King County and SE 172nd was very lightly used. It was, at the time, not an issue for County inspectors. Now that the area has been annexed and the City of Renton is transforming the area to high density from rural, the obstructions are a traffic and pedestrian safety issue. The parking curb on the south side of SE 172nd at the intersection with Benson Rd. extending to the western boundary of the proposed development is located twenty-seven feet from the property marker on the north side of SE l 72"d. If development of the required planting strip, sidewalks and curbs are placed along the north side prior to relocating the sidewalks on the south side, the width of SE 172nd would be reduced to thirteen feet, with no available parking. This is far from the minimum requirements for a mixed-use commercial road as has been designated by the City of Renton since the area was annexed. Since the City's reclassification of SE 172nd to a commercial-mixed use road from a residential street, no improvements have been made. It is stiH in the condition of a rural county road with high-density housing and commercial use being developed around it. It is being used by these developments as a short cut or way around the other clogged streets in the area. The City of Renton has shown disregard and negligence for the safety and well being of the families living in this older single family neighborhood. It seems, to many residents, that it is purposeful disregard. This was evidenced by the many thoughtful and concerned comments from residents in opposition to the placement of driveways to the Avana Ridge apartments onto SE 172nd. The City successfully argued on behalf of the non-resident developer to force traffic from the 74-unit apartment complex through the narrow roads with no streetlights or sidewalks, and against the concerns of the residents of the Renton neighborhood. Sincerely, Jerald and Ana Miller 10622 SE 172nd St Renton, WA 98055 TmillArnn,tri)..,,91,,nJ'\ "~"" February 27, 2017 Kevin Carl Magnet Design+Development 1631 lS'h Avenue, Suite 211 Seattle, WA 98119 SUBJECT: "On Hold" Notice Community & Economic Development Department CE. "Chip"Vincent, Administrator Renton Special Care Community/ LUA17-000023, CU-H, SA-A, ECF Dear Mr. Carl, The Planning Division of the City of Renton accepted the above master application for review on February 2, 2017. During our review, staff has determined that additional information is necessary in order to proceed further. The following information will need to be submitted before May 29, 2017 so that we may continue the review of the above subject application: • Please provide 5 full sized copies, 1 reduced copy (8 Y," x 11"), and an electronic copy of a revised site plan, landscape plan, generalized utility plan, grading plan, and preliminary drainage plan. The revised plans shall address the following comments: 1. The Proposed development fronts SE 172nd Street to the South. SE 172nd Street is a commercial mixed use and industrial access street. Existing right-of-way (ROW) width is approximately 60 feet. To meet the City's complete street standards for commercial missed use and industrial access streets, minimum ROW is 69 feet. Dedication of 4.5 feet of ROW fronting the site will be required. Half-street frontage improvements are required to be provided on the side of the street fronting the development. Frontage improvements would include an 8-foot parking lane, a 0.5 foot wide curb and gutter, an 8-foot wide landscaped planter, a 6-foot wide sidewalk, street lighting, and storm water improvements. a. The proposed frontage improvements along SE 172nd Street shown on the civil plans submitted by the applicant does not provide the LUA! 7-000023 Page 1 Community & Economic Development Department C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator minimum required pavement width of 20-feet for emergency vehicle access. Applicant shall provide a minimum of 26-feet of paved roadway to provide 20-feet for emergency vehicle access as well as to maintain the existing parking along the frontage of the property to the south of the development. 2. ADA access ramps shall be installed at all street crossings. Ramps shall be shown at each intersection. Ramps shall be oriented to provide direct pedestrian crossings. a. The proposed ADA ramp showing at the corner of SE 172nd Street and 1081h Ave SE shall be revised to include dual curb ramps; one ramp to face east and one ramp to face south. 3. The proposed development fronts 1081h Ave SE (SR-S15) along the east property lines. 1081h Ave SE is classified as a Minor Arterial Road. Existing right-of-way width in 1081h Ave SE is approximately 60 feet. 1081h Ave SE (SR-515) is classified as Principal Arterial. Minimum right-of-way for this street designation is 91 ft. To meet City's complete street standards, street improvements including a pavement width of 54-feet, a 0.5-foot curb, an 8-foot planting strip behind the curb, an 8-foot sidewalk, street trees and street lighting will be required. To build this street section, dedication of 15.5-feet of right-of-way fronting the site will be required. a. The frontage improvements along 1081h Ave SE shall include a 5-ft bike lane as outlined in the Renton Trails and Bicycles Master Plan. At this time, your project has been placed "on hold" pending receipt of the requested information. Please contact me at (425) 430-6598 if you have any questions. Sincerely, 9--'-"" ~ ;+~ ,::/ u Jill Ding Senior Planner cc: Renton Special Care Community/ Owner{s) George & Frances Subic / Owner(s) Margery Subic I Owner Sylvia Jean Coppock/ Party of Record Jerald & Ana Miller/ Parties of Record LUA! 7-000023 Page 2 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC,OEVELOPMENT~PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVITOFSERVICE BY MAILING On the 2'' day of February 2017, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Notice of Application and Acceptance documents. This information was sent to: Agencies See Attached 300' Surrounding Properties See Attached Kevin Carl, Magnet Design & Development Contact Margery Subic Owner George and Frances Subic Owner Renton Special Care Community Applicant '"'"""" "' "'"'"'' 9~ G ~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ~ ) COUNTY OF KING ) ss ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Jenny Cisneros signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary (Print): My appointment expires: template -affidavit of service by mailing • RENTON SPECIAL CARE COMMUNITY 2731 77TH AVE SE MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 Margery Subic PO BOX 769 Renton, WA 98057 George & Frances Subic PO Box 89 Renton. WA 98057 Kevin Carl Magnet Design+ Development 911 Western Ave, 575 Seattle. WA 98104 Dept. of Ecology** Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region* Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers* Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers * * * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. Attn: SEPA Section 35030 SE Douglas St. #210 Snoqualmie, WA 98065 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Seattle Public Utilities Jalaine Madura, Attn: SEPA Responsible Official 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 AGENCY (DOE) LEITER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology** Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. ** Attn: Misty Blair Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 39015-172nd Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program "'* 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn; Laura Murphy Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program** Environmental Planning Supervisor Attn: Erin Slaten Ms. Shirley Marroquin 39015 172"d Avenue SE 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 WDFW -Larry Fisher* Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Gretchen Kaehler Issaquah, WA 98027 PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Tim McHarg Attn: Charlene Anderson, AICP, ECD Director of Community Development 220 Fourth Avenue South 12835 Newcastle Way, Ste 200 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Newcastle, WA 98056 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Wendy Weiker, Community Svcs. Mgr. Jack Pace, Responsible Official 355 1101 h Ave NE 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Mailstop EST llW Tukwila, WA 98188 Bellevue, WA 98004 Puget Sound Energy Doug Corbin, Municipal Liaison Mgr. 6905 South 2281 h St Kent, WA 98032 *Note: lfthe Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. **Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov ** Karen Walter, laura Murphy and Erin Slaten with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. are emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email addresses: KWalter@muckleshoot.nsn.us / Laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us / erin .s laten@m uckleshoot. nsn. us ***Department of Natural Resources is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice the fo!lowing email address: sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov template -affidavit of service by mailing 87000265 87000265 87000270 Current Resident SUBIC FRANCES SANDERS Current Resident 17018 106th Ave SE PO BOX 89 17022 106th Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98055 87000275 87000280 87000280 RADTKE MICHAEL T+JULIANNE Current Resident CHAU HA MINH 17024 106TH AVE SE 17034 106th Ave SE 4101150TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 BELLEVUE, WA 98006 87000281 87000282 87000282 MILLER JERALD S+ANA L Current Resident KAIMAKIS II LLC 10622 SE 172ND ST 10618 SE 172nd St 3212 W WHEELER ST RENTON, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 PO BOX 34 SEATILE, WA 98199 87000283 87000285 87000291 MCMULLIN WALLACE C+ KIMMIE RENTON SPECIAL CARE COMMUNI Current Resident 17030 106TH AVE SE 2731 77TH AVE SE #203 17029 108th Ave SE RENTON, WA 98055 MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 Renton, WA 98055 87000291 87000293 87000295 TEUNG YAOTA Current Resident PHU LEEWOOD PO BOX 59252 17033 108th Ave SE C/0 PHU TONY RENTON, WA 98058 Renton, WA 98055 2462 SCHADT DR MAPLE WOOD, MN 55119 87000296 87000298 87000298 PHU LEEWOOD Current Resident NGY MORANY 3311112TH PL SE 17019 108th Ave SE 24203 36TH AVES EVERED, WA 98208 Renton, WA 98055 KENT, WA 98032 87000300 87000300 2923059009 Current Resident WILLIAMS CHARLES D Current Resident 17015 108th Ave SE 25603 ELK WILDERNESS DR SE 10615 SE 172nd St APT 202 Renton, WA 98055 MAPLE VALLEY, WA 98038 Renton, WA 98055 2923059028 2923059031 2923059052 SANBERG BRUCE+TAMI NIEMI RICHARD R+SYDNEY JET Current Resident 17014 SE 224TH ST 17022 108TH AVE SE 17020 108th Ave SE RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 2923059052 2923059176 2923059176 NIEMI DONALD R+SYDNEY J Current Resident Current Resident 17022 108TH SE 10717 SE 172nd St UNIT A 10717 SE 172nd St UNIT B RENTON, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 2923059168 3809000000 3809000000 AVANA TRAILS LLC GARCIA DANIEL F+KIMBERLY A KUMANO CORINE M 9675 SE 36TH ST #105 9660 MARKET BALL CIRCLE PO BOX 1751 MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 ANCHORAGE, AK 99507 RENTON, WA 98057 ,, 2923059176 3809000000 3809000000 RUSSELL DANIEL CALLIA GINA+RUTLEDGE KEVIN MILES RICHARD D PO BOX 8659 10809 SE 172ND ST #1-D MILES VIRGINIA C KENT, WA 98042 RENTON, WA 98055 10809-B SE 172ND ST RENTON, WA 98055 3809000000 3809000000 3809000000 COPPOCK SYLVA JEAN HART DONNA MAE TAMAYAO TERESITA T 10813 SE 172ND ST #2A 10813 SE 172ND ST #2B 10813 SE 172ND ST #2C RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 3809000000 3809000000 3809000000 BACANI DENNIS P+MARIA CIELO GLINES JEREMY THOMAS DAVIDE 10813 SE 172ND ST #D2 10817 SE 172ND ST #3B 10817 SE 172ND ST #3-D RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 3809000000 3809000000 3809000000 STEVENS KRISTIN L ANDERSON BETTY LEGGED JILL L 10817 SE 172ND ST #7-D 10817 SE 172ND ST #A-3 10817 SE 172ND ST UNIT C-3 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 3809000000 3809000000 3809000000 VARDANYAN EDUARD JUANEDA YARA THOMPSON MICHAEL 10821 SE 172ND ST #4B 10821 SE 172ND ST #4C 10821 SE 172ND ST 4A RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 3809000000 3809000000 3809000000 CHANG NIN-JA+KAO CHIAO-LING MELLOY RITA STANLEY D BRUCE+NANCY A 10825 SE 172ND ST #5-C 10825 SE 172ND ST #AS 10825 SE 172ND ST #BS RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 3809000000 3809000000 3809000000 BONIFANT DEANN MARIE WOODS JENNIFER L KELLAR ANN MARIE 10825 SE 172TH ST #SD 10829 SE 172ND ST #6 B 10829 SE 172ND ST #A6 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 3809000000 3809000000 3809000000 GOLD GLADYS M JAMMEH SAM BOU NJENGAH MIRIAM N+MWANGI SAM 10829 SE 172ND ST #D6 10833 SE 172ND ST #7B 10837 SE 172ND ST #8A RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 3809000000 3809000000 3809000000 BROWN VALERIE C SIMPSON KEYSHA CONE CLARA L 10837 SE 172ND ST #8B 10837 SE 172ND ST #8C 10841 SE 172ND ST #9C RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 3809000000 3809000000 3809000000 SMITH LAURAL GA RANA RICHARD ONORATI KAREN M 10841 SE 172ND ST #A-9 10841 SE 172ND ST #D 10841 SE 172ND ST 9 8 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 ... .4 , ' , ; . 3809000000 COBAN ADEM+SUTA SEUA 1205 THOMAS LN #12 RENTON, WA 98055 3809000000 LOUIE GARLAN W 9311 MAYES COURT 50 SEATILE, WA 98118 3809000000 MARYOTI DANA G PO BOX 188 OCEAN PARK, WA 98640 3809000000 SKEA LLC 12705 NE HOLMES PT KIRKLAND, WA 98034 3809000000 GARCIA DANIEL F+KIMBERLY A 9660 MARKET BALL CIRCLE ANCHORAGE, AK 99507 3809000000 NUNER DANIEL 21610 95TH PL 5 KENT, WA 98031 3809000000 KUMANO CORINE M PO BOX 1751 RENTON, WA 98057 Leslie Betlach -------Renton® Plan Review Routing Slip Plan Number: Site Address: LU Al 7-000023 17033 108TH AVE SE Name: Cottages Special Care Community Preapplication Description: The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit Review, Environmental (SEPA) Review, and Site Plan Review for the construction of a 60 bed memory care facility with three 4,747 square foot residential cottages (each with 20 beds) and one 2,778 square foot cottage for administrative /service uses. The project site is comprised of two lots totaling 65,761 square feet and is zoned Residential-14 (R-14). All proposed buildings are one story with a maximum height of 22 feet 2 inches. There are two driveway access points, one off of 108th Ave SE and the other off SE 172nd Street, which connect via a driveway along the north and west property lines. The applicant is proposing 26 surface parking space and associated landscaping along the north and west property lines (abutting existing residential development) as well as within the site. Frontage improvements are proposed along the site's SE 172nd Street and 180th Ave SE frontages. No critical areas are mapped on the project site. Review Type: Date Assigned: Community Services Review-Version 1 02/02/2017 Date Due: 02/16/2017 Project Manager: Jill Ding Environmental Impact Earth Animals Air Environmental Health Water Energy/Natural Resources Plants Housing Land/Shoreline Use Aesthetics Where to enter your comments: Manage My Reviews Which types of comments should be entered: -----------·-·---------.... ····----·--·--·-··-------·-- Light/GI a re Historic/Cu I tura l Preservation Recreation Airport Environmental Uti I iti es 10,000 Feet Transportation 14,000 Feet Public Service Recommendation -Comments that impact the project including any of the Enivornmental Impacts above. Correction -Corrections to the project that need to be made before the review can be completed and /or requesting submittal of additional documentation and/or resubmittal of existing documentation. What statuses should be used: Reviewed -I have reviewed the project and have no comments. Reviewed with Comments -I have reviewed the project and and I have comments entered in Recommendations. Correction/Resubmit -I have reviewed the project and the applicant needs to submit and/or resubmit documentation and I have added ~ . -c1rc tane fU0 '/lzc,.;/)::zJs I &c c;J ma~ ~~ 1Zoacl/mt11/J )l;x. ~ &~ ~ . p tV) 10 v rn /Javf fu r1 mdt/77an?C5 &~1 af1f ~ ~ -/!)-/] ate c1J"¥,GFRENTON ,91:e""~tMt~il~'~i'coI~1MUN1'1'Y'&ec::or.10M1doe,re~QrM.ENt:s'"I-ANN[r.1d61v1s1or.1 · ... . . . . .... . . ;Jl.ffl[)i\'lllll;Qf,SE!i.VI.C::l:.BYMA.l~ING> RENTON SPECIAL CARE COMMUNITY Applicant George & Frances Subic Owner Margery Subic Owner Jerald and Ana Miller Party of Record Kevin Carl Magnet Design+Development -Contact Sylvia Jean Coppock Party of Record STATE OF WASHINGTO COUNTY OF KING ) ) ss ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that SabriRa Mi Fa Rte ~, i/;c, n 5 ~ v<'r'c,C/l signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. 1 ?. ,)Olr ) Notary (Print): My appointment expires: , Cottages Special Care Community LUA17-000023 template -affidavit of service by mailing 0 '/ • . I RF/HON SPECIAL CARE COMMUNl1Y 2731 77TH AVE SE MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 Kevin C;irl Magnet Design+ Development 911 Western Ave, 575 Seattle, WA 98104 Geor_ge & Frances Subic PO Box 89 Renton, WA 98057 Margery Subic PO BOX 769 Renton, WA 98057 Jerald and Ana Miller 10622 SE 172nd St Renton, WA 98055-5415 Sy/via Jean Coppock 10812 SE 172nd St Renton, WA 980555966 t - RentOil® NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development {CED) -Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: LAND USE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: February 2, 2017 LUA17-000023, ECF, SA-A, CU-H Cottages Special Care Community PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit Review, Environmental (SEPA) Review, and Site Plan Review for the construction of a 60 bed memory care facility with three 4,747 square foot residential cottages {each with 20 beds) and one 2,778 square foot cottage for administrative/service uses. The project site is comprised of two lots totaling 65,761 square feet and is zoned Residential-14 (R-14). All proposed buildings are one story with a maximum height of 22 feet 2 inches. There are two driveway access points, one off of 108th Ave SE and the other off SE 172nd Street, which connect via a driveway along the north and west property lines. The applicant is proposing 26 surface parking space and associated landscaping along the north and west property lines (abutting existing residential development) as well as within the site. Frontage improvements are proposed along the site's SE 172nd Street and 180th Ave SE frontages. No critical areas are mapped on the project site. PROJECT LOCATION: 17033 108th Ave SE, Renton, WA 98055 OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined·that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional ONS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed ONS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance {DNS). This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: January 19, 2017 February 2, 2017 Kevin Carl/ Magnet Design & Development/ 163115th Ave Suite #211/ Seattle, WA 98119/ 206-778-4726/ kevin@magnet-dd.com Environmental ISEPA) Review, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review Building Permit, Construction Permit, Fire Permit Drainage Report, Geotechnical Report, Landscape Analysis, Parking Analysis Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) -Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 980S7 If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED-Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: Cottages Special Care Community/ LUA17-000023, ECF, SA-A, CU-H NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: _________________ City/State/Zip:------------ TELEPHONE NO.: --------------- PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: • Public hearing is tentatively scheduled for, April 18, 2017 before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers at 11:00 am on the 7th floor of Renton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. The subject site is designated RHD on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and R-14 on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental (SEPA} Checklist The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-2-llOA Residential Development Standards, RMC 4-4-070 Landscaping Regulations, RMC 4-4-080 Parking Regulations, RMC 4-9-030 Conditional Use Permit and RMC 4-9-200 Master Plan and Site Plan Review and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jill Ding, Senior Planner, CED -Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on February 17, 2017. This matter is also tentatively scheduled for a public hearing on April 18, 2017, at 11:00 am, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Planning Division to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled at (425) 430-6578. Following the issuance of the SEPA Determination, you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments regarding the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail, please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Jill Ding, Senior Planner; Tel: (42S) 430-6598; Eml: jding@rentonwa.gov I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I --------Renton® NC;J.N3f! DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -~~---RentoCITYnOF ~ 11 0? 6 I 14JI ~ ~·1 "· "; ,~ , ~-) .,-·· ,, ···. '; .· Plannint l>Msrori'. LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: Renton S=cial Care Communih, LLC PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Renton Special Care Community ADDRESS: 2731 77 1h Ave SE, Ste 203 PROJECT/ADORESS(S)ILOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 17033 108"' SE Renton, WA 98055 CITY: ZIP: Mercer Island, WA 98040 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425/417-6086 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): Parcel A: 00870000293 APPLICANT (if other than owner) ParcelB: 00870000285 NAME: EXISTING LAND USE(S): Single Family PROPOSED LAND USE($): Commercial/Convelecent COMPANY (if applicable): Home ~ EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: NA - PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CITY: ZIP: (rr applicable) NA TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING ZONING: R14 CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (rr applicable): R14 NAME: SITE AREA (in square feet): 1,51 AC/ 65,761 SF I ... ·--·-"·-·----- Kevin Carl SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE COMPANY (if applicable): DEDICATED: 3,504 SF Maanet desian+develooment -----··-- SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: ADDRESS: 163115"' Avenue Suite #211 0 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY: ZIP: Seattle, WA 98119 ACRE (if applicable) +/-8 units I AC 10. 4{ . ----------___ ,, ____ ,_, _______________ TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) 1 206/7784726 kevin@magnet-dd.com NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): )Z'._~ IS 1 C:\Us.ers\Kevin\Google Drive\Kevin Projects\Renton SCC\Clty Permlts\Checklist items\RSCC Land Use Permit Application.doc Rev: 08/2015 PROJECT INFORMATION (continued) NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: 1 $4.5 Million f-------------------·- SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): 13,992 GSF L....-.........------·---·--- IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA 0 AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE ---·--··· ------- SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL 0 AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS (if applicable): 2,200 1.....-........-----------·-·-·-----····---· 0 FLOOD HAZARD AREA Q sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA 0 GEOLOGIC HAZARD Q sq. ft. NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if 0 applicable): 2,450 GSF HABITAT CONSERVATION Q sq. ft. 0 NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES Q sq. ft. PROJECT (if applicable): 12 0 WETLANDS Q sq. ft. L-···-····-···-···-···-···-·-. ·----------. ----------·- LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY /Attach leaal descriotion on separate sheet with the followina information included) SITUATE IN THE SW QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23N, RANGE SE, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Namels) Willian R Moore Ill, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that I am (please check one) 0 the current owner of the property involved in this application or C!'si the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ~~sentative / 4¢1 Signature of OWner/Representative Date STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) 1 '· I', l) I W ,Q_ lA1702,6 I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ~'\I ' y· • signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purpose mentioned in the instrument. I I )-4 J lo r1-·····-·--·- Dated ,,,,11,u,,,,,1_ ·· ,,, '1,,."(ISVM :I!' ~,,, ~~~ ... ";..)-~ S'ovX\·tl:·,a .:v"'~ ~ ... , ... _~ -... ::N'18Ad V> -I~ >.!NJ.ON j ,It I £~?, · Notary Public in a.ii; the State of Washington 0fa~~~nt> YI (};.7Mf My appointment expires. c; l 1 . .'-) / -Z..or1- ,;...z-•.O',.h. ~ '.'I)"~ ', 7".6-"':~ NO\~,;; .;,.~ ~ 2 ,.., O' ') ....... ~$' ,, 1 3!!':HO\•• ,,. C:\Users\Kevin\<f'd',IJI; Wjif\~""' Projects\Renton SCC\C,ty Perm,ts\Checkhst 1tems\RSCC Land Use Permit Application doc Rev: 08/2015 Renton Special Care Cv, .. munity 17033 1081h Avenue SE Renton, WA 98157 Site Plan & Conditional Use Submittal Materials JAN l 9 201? 1. Pre-Application Meeting Summary \ PRE-APPLICATION MEETING COMMENTS FOR THE COTIAGE SPECIAL CARE COMMUNITY PRElG-000116 CITY OF RENTON Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division MARCH 3, 2016 Contact Information: Planner: Clark H. Close, 425-4~0-7289 Public Works Plan Reviewer: Ann Fowler, 425-430-7382 Fire Prevention Reviewer: Corey Thomas, 425-430-7024 Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell, 425-430-7290 Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects, and contractors who work on the project. You will need to submit a copy of this packet when you apply for land use and/or environmental permits. Pre-screening: When you have the project application ready for submittal, call and schedule an appointment with the project manager to have it pre-screened before making all of the required copies. The pre-application meeting is informal and non-binding. The comments provided on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review. The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly amended and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of project submittal. The information contained in this summary is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Planning Director, Development Services Director, Department of Community & Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator and City Council). 0. FIRE & EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT -----Renton® MEMORANDUM DATE: March 3, 2016 TO: Clark Close, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: The Cottages Special Care Community· 17033 108th Ave SE PRE16-000115 1. The preliminary fire flow is 1,750 gpm. A minimum of two fire hydrants are required. One within 150-feet and one within 300-feet of each building. Hydrant spacing shall meet maximum spacing requirements of 300-feet also. One hydrant is required within SO-feet of all fire department connections for the sprinkler systems. Existing hydrants may be counteq toward the requirements as long as they meet current code. A water availability certificate is required from Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. 2. Fire impact fees are applicable at the rate of $0.14 a square foot for the administration/ office building and $5.56 a square foot for the cottage buildings. This fee is paid at time of building permit issuance. 3. Approved fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems are required throughout the cottage buildings only. Direct outside access is required to the fire sprinkler riser rooms. Fire alarm systems are required to be fully addressable and full detection is required. Separate plans and permits required for the fire alarm, fire sprinkler and the kitchen hood fire suppression system by the fire department. 4. Fire department apparatus access roadways are required within 150-feet of all_ points on the buildings. Fire access roads are required to be a minimum of 20-feet unobstructed width with turning radius of 25-feet inside and 45-feet outside minimum. Fire lane sign age required for the onsite roadways. Roadways shall support a minimum of a 30- ton vehicle and 75-psi point loading. 5. An electronic site plan is required prior to occupancy for pre-fire planning purposes. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -----Renton® DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: M E M O R A N D U M 3/3/2016 Clark Close, Planner Ann Fowler, Plan Review The Cottages Special Care Community 17033108'" Ave SE PRElG-000115 NOTE: The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary is preliminary and non· binding and may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official City decision-makers. Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. I have completed a preliminary review for the above-referenced proposal located at parcel(s) 0087000293 & 0087000285. The following comments are based on the pre-application submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant. WATER 1. Water service is provided by Soos Creek Water and Sewer District (253-630-9900 or www .sooscree k. com). 2. The applicant shall obtain a certificate of water availability from the District and provide a copy of the certificate to the City of Renton as part of the application for the building permit. 3. This site is located outside of an Aquifer Protection Area Zone. SEWER 1. Sewer service is provided by Soos Creek Water and Sewer District (253-630-9900 or www.sooscreek.com). 2. The applicant shall obtain a certificate of sewer availability from the District and provide a copy of the certificate to the City of Renton as part of the application for the building permit. SURFACE WATER 1. There is a 12-inch stormwater main in 108'" Ave SE. 2. There is a 12-lnch culvert in SE 172"' Street. 3. A drainage report complying with the City adopted 2009 King County Surface Water Manual and City Amendments will be required. Based on the City's flow control map, the site falls within the The Cottages Special Care Community-PRE16-000115 3/3/2016 Page 2 of3 Flow Co'ntrol Duration Standard area matching Forested Site Conditions and is within the Black River Drainage Basin. Refer to Figure 1.1.2.A -Flow chart to determine the type of drainage review required in the City of Renton 2009 Surface Water Design Manual Amendment. 4. Appropriate Individual lot flow control BMPs will be required to help mitigate the new runoff created by this development. The final drainage plan and drainage report must be submitted with the utility construction permit application. 5. A Construction Stormwater Permit from Department of Ecology is required if clearing and grading of the site exceeds one acre. 6. A geotechnical report for the site is required. Information on the water table and soil permeability, with recommendations of appropriate flow control BMP options with typical designs for the site from the geotechnical engineer, shall be submitted with the application. 7. Surface water system development fee is $0.594 per square foot of new impervious surface area, but not less.than $1,485.00. This is payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. TRANSPORTATION 1. The proposed development fronts SE 172"' Street to the south ·and 1081h Ave SE to the east. 2. SE 172"' St Is a commercial mixed use and industrial access street. Existing right-of-way (ROW) width is approximately 60 feet. To meet the City's complete street standards for commercial mixed use and industrial access streets, minimum ROW is 69 feet. Dedication of 4.5 feet of ROW fronting the site will be required. Half-street frontage improvements are required to be provided on the side of the street fronting the development. Frontage improvements would include an 8-foot parking lane, a 0.5 foot wide curb and gutter, an 8-foot wide landscaped planter, a 6-foot wide sidewalk, street lighting, and stormwater improvements 3. 108th Ave SE is classified as a Minor Arterial Road. Existing right-of-way (ROW) width is approximately 60 feet. To meet the City's complete street standards for minor arterial streets, minimum ROW is 91 feet. Dedication of 15.5 feet of ROW fronting the site will be required. Per City code 4-6-060, frontage improvements would include a 0.5 foot wide curb and gutter, an 8- foot wide landscaped planter strip, an 8-foot wide sidewalk, street lighting, and stormwater improvements. 4. Site access along 108th Ave SE must be a minimum of 125-feet from the intersection of SE 172"' Street and 108th Ave SE. 5. Refer to City code 4-4-080 regarding driveway regulations. a. A minimum separation of 5 feet is required between driveway and the property line. b. The maximum driveway width shall not exceed 30-feet. 6. Parking lot construction shall be in accordance with City code 4-4-SOG. 7. Street lighting and street trees are required. 8. A traffic impact analysis Is required when the estimated vehicular traffic generated from a proposed development exceeds 20 vehicles per hour in either the AM {6:00 -9:00) orPM {3:00 -6:00) peak periods. Traffic study guidelines are included with the pre-application packet. The analysis must include a discussion on traffic circulation to and from the site and onsite traffic circulation. The study shall include trip generation and trip distribution for the project for both AM and PM peak hours. 9. Payment of the transportation impact fee is applicable on the construction of the single family houses at the time of application for the building permit. The current rate of transportation The Cottages Special Care Community-PRE16·000115 3/3/2016 Page3of3 impact fee for the designated use is $494.92 per bed. The transportation impact fee that is current at the time of building permit application will be levied, payable at building permit issue. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. All construction or service utility permits for drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. When utility plans are complete, please submit four (4) copies of the drawings, two (2) copies of the drainage report, one (11 complete electronic submittal (drawings and drainage report), the permit application, an itemized cost of construction estimate, and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. 3. All sewer stubs, water services and storm connections are required to be provided to each lot prior to recording of the short plat. 4. Fees quoted in this document reflect the fees applicable in the year 2016 only and will be assessed based on the fee that is current at the time of the permit application. 5. All utilities serving the site are required to be undergrounded. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT --~Renton® DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: M E M O R A N D U M March 3, 2016 Pre-Application File No. 16-000115 Clark Close, Senior Planner The Cottages Speclal Care Community 17033 108th Ave SE, Renton, WA 98055 General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes In effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers {e.g., Hearing Examiner, Community & Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator, Planning Director, Development Services Director, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall or online at www.rentonwa.gov. Project Proposal: The subject property is located at 17033 108th Ave SE near the intersection of 108th Ave SE and SE 172nd St. The site consists of two parcels (APN 008700-0293 and -0285) totaling 65,761 square feet (1.5 acres). The parcels have a Residential High Density {RHO) land use designation and a Residential-14 (R-14) zoning classification. The north parcel is developed with a single family residence and several detached accessory buildings. The larger parcel, located at the corner, is currently undeveloped. The proposal would Include a lot line adjustment to create a larger developable lot. Following a lot line combination, the applicant is proposing to construct four separate one-story cottages with 42 resident rooms for up to 60 bed memory care community. One of the four buildings would be a 2,400 administrative service cottage. The cottage project would also contai_n a central commercial kitchen with a pantry, administrative office suite and reception area supporting a general manager, licensed nurse, marketer, activities, director, cook, maintenance staff and certified nursing assistants (CNA's) together with outdoor patios, landscaped walkways and courtyard spaces. A two-way travel lane is proposed along the north and west sides of the development with ingress/egress to 108th Ave SE and SE 172nd St. 30-32 parking is shown on the north side of the proposed buildings and a drop off areas would be located adjacent to the main facility entry. Current Use: Currently, there is a 1,910 square foot single family residence located onsite which is proposed for demolition. H:\CED\Planning\Current Planning\PREAPPS\16-000115 The Cottages Special Care Community Page 2 of7 March 3, 2016 Zoning/Density Requirements: The subject property is located within the R-14 zoning classification. The purpose of the Residential-14 Zone (R-14) is to encourage development, and redevelopment, of residential neighborhoods that provide a mix of detached and attached dwelling structures organized and designed to combine characteristics of both typical single family and small-scale multi-family developments. The density range required in the R-14 zone is a minimum of 7.0 to a maximum of 14.0 dwelling units per net acre (du/ac) with opportunities for bonuses up to eighteen (18) dwelling units per net acre for assisted living, subject to conditions of RMC 4-9-065, Density Bonus Review. A convalescent centers is defined as a facility licensed by the State for patients who are recovering health and strength after Illness or injury, or receiving long-term care for chronic conditions, disabilities, or terminal illnesses. Facilities provide twenty-four (24) hour supervised nursing care and feature extended treatment that is administered by a skilled nursing staff. Typically, residents do not live in individual units and the facilities provide personal care, room, board, laundry service, and organized activities. This definition does not include adult family homes, assisted living, group homes II, medical institutions, and/or secure community transition facilities. A convalescent center requires a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use permit within the R-14 zone. Development Standards: The project would be subject to RMC 4-2-llOA, "Development Standards for Residential Zoning Designations" effective at the time of complete application (noted as "R-14 standards" herein). Minimum Lot Size. Width and Depth -The minimum lot size for detached dwelling is 3,000 square feet (no minimum lot size required for attached dwellings) within the R-14 zone. The minimum lot width required is 30 feet and the minimum lot depth required Is 60 feet. The applicant would need to request a lot combination as part of the Site Plan application, It is the applicant's responsibility to demonstrate compliance with the minimum lot size, width and depth criteria of the zone at the time of formal application. Building Standards-The R-14 zone restricts building height to a maximum wall plate height standard, defined as the vertical distance from the grade plan to the highest wall plate. Wall plates are restricted to 24 feet in height, and the buildings shall be not more than three stories. Roofs with a pitch equal to or greater than 4:12 may project an additional six (6) vertical feet from the maximum wall plate height; common rooftop features, such as chimneys, may project an additional four (4) vertical feet from the roof surface. Non-exempt vertical projections (e.g., decks, railings, etc.) shall not extend above the maximum wall plate height unless the projection is stepped back one-and-a-half (1.5) horizontal feet from each fa~ade for each one (1) vertical foot above the maximum wall plate height. Detached accessory structures must remain below a height of 15 feet. The gross floor area must be less than that of the primary structure. Maximum building lot coverage is limited to 65%. Impervious surface coverage is limited to a maximum of 80%. Lot coverage ratios or elevations were not provided with the pre-application packet; therefore, staff could not confirm compliance with the building standards for the R-14 zone. The applicant will be required at the time of formal land use application to provide verification of lot coverage, impervious surface calcu/atioM and building height. Setbacks -Setbacks are the minimum required distance between the building footprint and the property line and any private access easement. The required setbacks in the R-14 zone are 15 feet in the front yard, except when all vehicle access is taken from an alley, then 10 feet, 10 feet in the rear yard, and 15 feet for side yards along-a-street. It appears the proposal comp/Jes with the a/I the setbacks of the R-14 zone, Including by providing o minimum of 16 feet from 108th H:\CED\Planning\Current Planning\PREAPPS\16-000115 The Cottages Special Care Community Page 3 of7 March 3, 2016 Ave SE and 20 feet from SE 172nd St far /rant yard and side yard along-a-street. It is the applicant's responsibility to demonstrate compliance with all setbacks ot the time of formal application. ' Screening -Screening must be provided for all surface-mounted and roof top utility and mechanical equipment. The site plan appllcatlon will need to Include elevations and details for screening. Refuse and Recycling Areas-Refuse and recycling areas need to meet the requirements of RMC 4-4-090, "Refuse and Recyclables Standards." For other nonresidential developments, a minimum of 3 square feet per dwelling unit shall be provided for recyclable deposit areas, and a minimum of 6 square feet per dwelling unit shall be provided for refuse deposit areas with a combined total minimum area of 100 square feet. Outdoor refuse and recyclables deposit areas and collection points shall not be located in any required setback or landscape areas and not within fifty feet (50') of a lot zoned residential, except by approval through the site development plan review process, or through the modification process if exempt from site development plan review. The proposal would be required ta demonstrate compliance with the refuse and recycling standards of the code at the time of formal application. Landscaping: Except for critical areas, all portions of the development area not covered by structures, required parking, access, circulation or service areas, must be landscaped with native, drought-resistant vegetative cover. The development standards require that all pervious areas within the property boundaries be landscaped. The minimum on-site landscape width required along street frontages i_s 10 feet, except where reduced through the site plan development review process. A landscaping strip with a minimum fifteen feet (1~') of width shall be located on the outside of the fence of all storm drainage facilities, unless otherwise determined through the site plan review or subdivision review process. Parking is not permitted within required landscape areas. All parking lots, with 15 to 50 stalls, are required to provide 15 square feet of interior parking lot landscaping per parking space in addition to perimeter parking lot landscaping. A conceptual landscape plan and landscape analysis meeting the requirements in RMC 4-8-120D.12 shall be submitted at the time of application for Site Plan Review. Nonresidential Development in a Residential Zone: A fifteen-foot (15') wide partially sight- obscuring landscaped visual barrier, or ten-foot (10') wide fully sight-obscuring landscaped visual barrier, is required along common property lines. Please refer to landscape regulations {RMC 4-4-070) for additional general and specific landscape requirements. Fences/Walls: If the applicant intends to install any fences or retaining walls as part of this project, the location must be designated on the landscape plan or grading plan. A fence and/or wall detail should also be included on the plan. A fence taller than 6 feet shall require a building permit or an explicit exemption from the Building Official. A retaining wall that is 4 feet or taller, as measured by the vertical <listance from the bottom of the footing to the finish grade at the top of the wall requires a building permit. A fence shall not be constructed on top of a retaining wall unless the total combined height of the retaining wall and the fence does not exceed the allowed height of a standalone fence. For more information about fences and retaining walls refer to RMC 4-4-040. Significant Tree Preservation: An arborist report and a tree retention plan, along with a tree retention worksheet, shall be provided with the formal land use application. The tree retention H:\CED\Planning\Current Plannlng\PREAPPS\16-000115 The Cottages Special Care Community Page 4 of7 March 3, 2016 plan must show preservation of at least 20 percent (20%} of significant trees, and indicate how proposed building footprints would be sited to accommodate preservation of significant trees that would be retained. The Administrator may authorize the planting of replacement trees on the site if it can be demonstrated to the Administrator's satisfaction that an insufficient number of trees can be retained. Significant trees shall be retained in the following priority order: Priority One: Landmark trees; significant trees that form a continuous canopy; significant trees on slopes greater than twenty percent (20%); Significant trees adjacent to critical areas and their associated buffers; and Significant trees over sixty feet (60') in height or greater than eighteen inches (18") caliper. Priority Two: Healthy tree groupings whose associated undergrowth can be preserved; Other significant native evergreen or deciduous trees; and Other significant non-native trees. Priority Three: Alders and cottonwoods shall be retained when all other trees have been evaluated for retention and are not able to be retained, unless the alders and/ or cottonwoods are used as part of an approved enhancement project within a critical area or its buffer. The Administrator may require independent review of any land use application that involves tree removal and land clearing at the City's discretion. If staff determines that the trees f!!l1!1!l1. be retained, replacement trees, with at least a 2-inch caliper or an evergreen at least 6 feet tall, shall be planted at a rate of 12 caliper inches of new trees to replace each protected tree removed. A formal tree retention plan prepared by an arborist or landscape architect would be reviewed at the time of formal application. Convalescent centers: A minimum and maximum of 1 for every 2 employees plus 1 for every 3 beds. 34 The applicant is proposing a total of 30-32 parking spaces for the 60 bed convalescent center, which is less than the minimum and maximum number of stalls at 34, A twenty five percent (25%) reduction or increase from the minimum or maximum number of parking spaces may be granted for nonresidential uses through site plan review if the applicant can justify the modification to the satisfaction of the Administrator. Justification might include, but is not limited to, quantitative information such as sales receipts, documentation of customer frequency, and parking standards of nearby cities. It should be noted that the parking regulations specify standard stall dimensions. Surface parking stalls must be a minimum af9 feet x 20 feet, compact dimensions of BX feet x 16 feet, and parallel stall dimensions of 9 feet x 23 feet; compact surface parking spaces shall not account for more than 30 percent (30%) of the spaces in the surface parking lots. Compact surface parking spaces within structured parking areas are not to exceed 50 percent {50%). ADA accessible stalls must be a minimum of 8 feet in width by 20 feet in length, with an adjacent access aisle of 8 feet in width for van accessible spaces. The appropriate amount of ADA accessible stalls based on the total number of spaces must be provided for, see RMC 4-4- 080F.8.g. Please refer to RMC 4-4-070 and RMC 4-4-0BOF for further general and specific landscaping requirements and parking lot design standards. H:\CED\Planning\Current Planning\PREAPPS\16-000115 The Cottages Special Care Community Page 5 o/7 March 3, 2016 Addltlonally, the proposal would need to provide bicycle parking based on ten percent {10%} of the number of required off-street parking spaces. Bicycle parking facilities shall include a rack that is permanently affixed to the ground and supports the bicycle at two (2) or more points and shall be visible to cyclists from street sidewalks or-0uilding entrances, so that it provides sufficient security from theft and damage. Please refer to RMC 4-4-0BOF.11.b for additional bicycle parking standards. Otherwise the proposal would be required to demonstrate compliance with the bicycle parking standards of the code at the time of formal application. Access: The applicant is proposing primary access to the site via 108th Ave SE and SE 172nd St. From 108th the access would be near the northeast property corner and from 17nd the access would be near the southwest property corner. Street improvements, including, curbs, gutter and sidewalk, are required along the frontage of the properties. Driveway widths are limited by the driveway standards, In RMC 4-4080!. Whenever a building permit is app/Jed for, the applicant shall build and Install street Improvements (RMC 4-6-050). The location of the ingress and egress driveway shall be subject to op pro val of the Department of Community and Economic Development. Pedestrian Access -The proposed site plan is required to provide pedestrian connections from all public entrances to the street, in order to provide direct, clear and separate pedestrian walks from sidewalks to building entries and internally from buildings to abutting properties. Critical Areas: A stream and a wetland may be onsite. A reconnaissance study would be required to be submitted with the land use application. If it is determined that a wetland and/or stream is located on site or within 200 feet of the site a wetland and stream report delineating and classifying the wetland and stream on site is required to be submitted with the formal land use application. In addition, as there are proposed impacts to the wetland and/or stream, a mitigation plan should also be submitted. City staff may require secondary review of the wetland and/or stream report, at the expense of the applicant. Wetlands and their associated buffers are required to be placed within a Native Growth Protection Easement to protect the critical area from any proposed development for a non- exempt activity. It is the applicant's responsibility to ascertain whether additional critical areas are present on the site. If so, the proposal would need to be revised accordingly. Lot Combination: The applicant would need to complete a lot combination to meet the setbacks of the zone and provide adequate onsite parking as part of the project. Note: There Is no charge for a lot combination appiication. Environmental (SEPA} Review: The proposed project would be subject to Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review due to the size of the project. Therefore, an environmental checklist is a submittal requirement. An environmental determination will be made by the Renton Environmental Review Committee. This determination Is subject to appeal by either the project proponent, by a citizen of the community, or another entity having standing for an appeal. Note: The fee for Envlranmental {SEPA} Review Is $1,030.00 {$1,000.00 plus 3 % Technology Surcharge Fee}. Permit Requirements: Hearing Examiner Site plan review is required for all development in the R-14 zones per RMC 4-9-200. The purpose of Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review is to analyze the detailed arrangement of project elements to mitigate negative Impacts where necessary to ensure project compatibility with the physical characteristics of a site and with the surrounding H:\CED\Planning\Current Planning\PREAPPS\16-000115 ''· The Cottages Special Care Community Page 6 of 7 March 3, 2016 area. An additional purpose of Site Plan Review is to ensure quality development consistent with City goals and policies General review criteria includes the following: a. Compliance and Consistency. Conformance with plans, policies, regulations and approvals, including: b. Off-Site Impacts. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses. c. On-Site Impacts. Mitigation of impacts to the site. d. Access and Circulation. Safe and efficient access and circulation for all users. e. Open Space. Incorporation of public and private open spaces to serve as distinctive project focal points and to provide adequate areas for passive and active recreation by the occupants/users of the site; f. Views and Public Access. Provision of view corridors to shorelines and Mt. Rainier, incorporates public access to shorelines, and arranges project elements to protect existing natural systems where applicable; g. Services and Infrastructure. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; h. Signage. Use of signs primarily for the purpose of identification and management of sign elements -such as the number, size, brightness, lighting intensity, and location -to complement the visual character of the surrounding area, avoid visual clutter and distraction, and appear in proportion to the building and site to which they pertain; and i. Phasing. Inclusion of a detailed sequencing plan with development phases and estimated time frames, if applicable. The applicant will also be subject to Hearing Examiner Conditional Use permit, Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review, and Environmental Review due to the size of the project. All applications can be reviewed concurrently in an estimated time frame of 10-12 weeks once a complete application is accepted. The Hearing Examiner Conditional Use application fee is $2,575.00 ($2,500.00 each plus a 3% Technology Surcharge Fee), Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review application fee is $2,575.00 ($2,500.00 each plus a 3% Technology Surcharge Fee), SEPA fee is $1,030.00 ($1,000.00 plus 3 % Technology Surcharge Fee), and each modification request is $154.50 ($150.00 each plus a 3% Technology Surcharge Fee). Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal is available on the City's website. In addition to the required land use permits, separate construction and building permits would be required. Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction fees, impact fees would be required. Such fees would apply to all projects and would be calculated at the time of building permit application and payable prior to building permit issuance. The 2016 application fees are as follows: • A Transportation Impact Fee of $494.92 per bed and $9.39 per square foot for medical office. Alternatively, the fee would be calculated per the ITE manual; H:\CED\Planning\Current Planning\PREAPPS\16-000115 ~ :IJ\V f.f!80L ____ _...,.} ------~ A " ... ~ . ..,, I I iL J_ ., >' ) City of Renton Print map Template 91 0 45 91 WGS _ 1984_ Web _Mercator_ Aux!liary_ Sphere ... , Information Technology -GIS RentonMapSupport@Rentonwa.gov 03/0212016 This mep Is a user gcmerated static Clutpul from an Internet mapping site and Is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be aecura1e, amen!, or otherwis" reliable, THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGA TJON ) Legend City and County Boundary Q O!har [:J City of Renton Addresses D Parcels Zoning • RC-Resourt:e ConserwUon • R1-ResldenUal 1 du/ac QJ R4-ResldenU814 du/ac R6-Rasldenllal -6 DU/AC RB-Res!denlial a du.lac • R10-Reaidentlal 1 O du/ac m R14-Resldertial 14 du/ae • RMF-Resldential Multi-Family • RMH-Resldtlntial Manufacti.xed Homes II CN-Commercial Neighborhood • CV-Center VIiiage • CA-Commercial Arterial • UC-Urban Canter • CD-Center Downtown • COR.commercial Offlce/Resid&ntial • CO-Commercial Office ll,.Jndusb1al. Ughl • IM-lndus!rial -Medium • IH-lnduallial • HellY)' Overlay Districts 0 AutoMalA {;J AutoMaJ 8 fl] Employrnanl Af'88 Vattey a City Canter Sign Reguatlon An!la [2J Urblln Design District A !SJ Urban Design Dismct B Notes The Cottage Special Care Community 0 ~one Finance & IT Division Kevin Carl !':rom: Sent: To: Clark Close <CClose@Rentonwa.gov> Thursday, March 3, 2016 4:49 PM Kevin Carl Subject: RE: Renton Special Care Community Categories: Red Category Kevin, Sure. Also, here are the follow-up items from today's pre-application meeting: 1. Power poles -It appears there are 2-3 poles that will need to be relocated for the project. The City will not require them to be undergrounded. 2. Lighting standards and street standards can be found here: COR Standard Details 3. Street section information can be found here: RMC 4-6-060. We do not have cut sheets for our street sections. ' 4. The additional transportation impact fee for the admin building would be $5.10/sq ft (coded as a General Office). The transportation impact fee that is current at the time of building permit ;application and applicable to the proposed uses of the buildings will be levied, payable at building permit issue. Let me know if you have any further questions . . ~hank_s, Clark H. Close Senior Planner City of Renton 425-430-7289 From: Kevin earl [mailto:kevin@magnet-dd.com] Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 4:47 PM To: Clark Close Subject: RE: Renton Special care Community Thx for your time today I From: Clark Close [mailto:CClose@Rentonwa.gov] Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2016 1:22 PM To: Kevin Carl <kevin@magnet-dd.com> Subject: RE:. Renton Special Care Community Kevin, As requested, please find attached pre-app meeting summary packet. Clark H. Close Senior Planner I <'.ity of •1enton 425-430-7289 • .om: Kevin Carl [mailto:kevin@magnet-dd.com) Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 4:02 PM To: Clark Close Subject: RE: Renton Special Care Community Clark we do want to meet and discuss this site Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE DeVlce --------Original message-------- From: Clark Close <CClose@Rentonwa.gov> Date:02/24/2016 3:39 PM (GMT-08:00) To: Kevin Carl <kevin@magnet-dd.co111> Cc: Subject: Renton Special Care Community Kevin, We've got you scheduled for a pre-application meeting for Thursday, March 3'' at 10:00 am. The location of the site or ~7033 108th Ave Se, that was identified on the pre-a pp submittal, is the same address as other project that I've been working on with Mark Travers Architect firm. They've indicated that they a re close to submitting for preliminary plat and site plan application. I'm wondering if you still want to hold the pre-application meeting for this site next Thursday? Thanks, Clark H. Close City of Renton -Current Planning Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Tel: 425-430-7289 Fax: 425-430-7300 cclose@rentonwa.gov 2 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS SITE PLAN REVIEW Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE: To assure the site plan is compatible with both the physical characteristics of the site and the existing and potential uses of the surrounding area. In addition, Site Plan Review assures the development is consistent with City of Renton plans, policies and regulations. FREE CONSULTATION MEETING: Prior to submitting an application, the applicant should informally discuss the proposed development with the Planning Division. The Planning Division will provide assistance and detailed information on the City's requirements and standards. Applicants may also take this opportunity to request the waiver of the City's typical application submittal requirements which may not be applicable to the specific proposal. For further information on this meeting, see the instruction sheet entitled "Submittal Requirements: Pre-Application." COMPLETE APPLICATION REQUIRED: ,In order to accept your application, each of the numbered items must be submitted at the same time. If you have received a prior written waiver of a submittal item(s) during a pre-application meeting, piease provide the waiver form in iieu of any submittal item not provided. All plans and attachments must be folded to a size not exceeding 8V. by 11 inches. · -.· ! , ~ , : , • _ -c: -. , . , , APPLICATION SCREENING: Applicants are encouraged to bring in one copy of the application package for informal review by staff, prior to making the requested number of copies, colored drawings, or photo reductions. Please allow approximately 45 minutes for application screening. APPLICATION SUBMIITAL HOURS: Applications should be submitted to Development Services staff at the 6th floor counter of Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, between 8:00 A.M. and 4:00 P.M. Monday through Friday. Please call your assigned project manager to schedule an appointment or call {425) 430-7200 extension 4 to reach the Planning Division. Due to the screening time required, applications delivered by messenger cannot be accepted. ADDITIONAL PERMITS: Additional permits from other agencies may be required. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain these other approvals. Information regarding these other requirements may be found at http://apps.ecy.wa.gov/opas/ All Plans and Attachments must be folded 8 Yz 11 by 1111 APPLICATION MATERIALS: 7. D 8. D 9. D proposed • Number, type and size of any trees to be removed • Explanation of any land to be dedicated to the City • Any proposed job shacks, sales trailers, and/or model homes • Any proposed modifications being requested (include written justification) For projects located within 100 feet of a stream or wetland, please include: • Distance in feet from the wetland or stream to the nearest area of work For projects located within 200-feet of Black River, Cedar River, Springbrook Creek, May Creek and Lake Washington please include the following additional information: • Distance from closest area of work to the ordinary high water mark. • Description of the nature of the existing shoreline • The approximate location of and number of residential units, existing and potential, that will have an obstructed view in the event the proposed project exceeds a height of 35-feet above the average grade level Rezone, Variance, Modification, or Conditional Use Justification: Please contact the Planning Division to determine whether your project proposal triggers any additional land use permits. If so, additional information may be required. Draft Legal Documents: Please provide 4 copies of any proposed street dedications, restrictive covenants, draft Homeowners Association, or any other legal documents pertaining to the development and use of the property. Urban Center Design Overlay District Report: For any multi-family projects in the Center Downtown or Residential-Multi-family Urban Zones, please provide 5 copies of a statement addressing how the project meets the requirements of the Urban Center Design Overlay District. The statement shall address the following: • Pedestrian building entries • Transition to surrounding development • Location and design of parking • Vehicular access • Pedestrian circulation • Common space • Landscaping • Building character and massing, rooflines, and materials 10. D Construction Mitigation Description: Please provide 5 copies of a written narrative addressing each of the following: • Proposed construction dates (begin and end dates) • Hours and days of operation • Proposed hauling/transportation routes • Measures to be implemented to minimize dust, traffic and transportation impacts, erosion, mud, noise, and other noxious characteristics • Any special hours proposed for construction or hauling (i.e. weekends, late -3 - H:\CED\Oata\fom,s-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\sa.doc 03/12 .t\ • Date, scale, and north arrow (oriented to the top of the paper/plan sheet) • Drawing of the subject property with all property lines dimensioned and names of adjacent streets • Widths of all adjacent streets and alleys • Location of all existing public improvements including, but not limited to, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, median islands, street trees, fire hydrants, utility poles, etc., along the full property frontage • Location and dimensions of existing and proposed: 1. structures 2. parking, off-street loading space, curb cuts and aisle ways 3. fencing and retaining walls 4. free-standing signs and lighting fixtures 5. refuse and recycling areas 6. utility junction boxes and public utility transformers 7. storage areas and job shacks/sales trailers/model homes • Setbacks of all proposed buildings from property lines • Location and dimensions of all easements referenced in the title report with the recording number and type of easement (e.g. access, sewer, etc.) indicated • Location and dimensions of natural features such as streams, lakes, required buffer areas, open spaces, and wetlands • Ordinary high water mark and distance to closest area of work for any project located within 200-feet from a lake or stream 16. D Landscape Plan, Conceptual: Please provide 5 copies of a fully-dimensioned plan drawn at the same scale as the project site plan (or other scale approved by the Planning Division), clearly indicating the following: • Date, graphic scale, and north arrow • Location of proposed buildings, parking areas and access, and existing buildings to remain • Names and locations of abutting streets and public improvements, including easements • Existing and proposed contours at two-foot intervals or less • Location and size of planting areas • Location and height of proposed berming • Location and elevations for any proposed landscape-related structures such as arbors, gazebos, fencing, etc. • Location, size, spacing and names of existing (to remain) and proposed shrubs, trees, and ground covers. Locations of decorative rocks or landscape improvements in relationship to proposed and existing utilities and structures • Trees to be retained and associated driplines • For wireless communication facilities, indicate type and locations of existing and new plant materials used to screen facility components and the proposed color(s) for the facility -5- H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\PJanning\sa.doc 03/12 21.0 improvements Tree Retention Worksheet: Please provide 2 copies of a completed City of Renton tree retention worksheet. 22. 0 Landscape analysis, lot coverage, and parking analysis (For commercial/industrial 23.0 properties only): please provide 5 copies of a landscape and parking analysis including: • Total square footage of the site and the footprints of all buildings • Total square footage of existing and proposed impervious surface area(s) • Square footage (by floor and overall total) of each individual building and/or use • Percentage of lot covered by buildings or structures • Number of parking spaces required by City code • Number and dimensions of standard, compact, and ADA accessible spaces provided· • Square footage of parking lot landscaping (perimeter and interior) Wetland Assessment: Please provide 12 copies of the map and 5 copies of the report if ANY wetlands are located on the subject property or within 100 feet of the subject property. The wetland report/delineation must include the information specified in RMC 4-8°120D. In addition, if any alteration to the wetland or buffer is proposed, 5 copies of a wetland mitigation plan is also required. See RMC 4-8-1200 for plan content requirements. 24. 0 Standard Stream or Lake Study: Please provide 12 copies of a report containing the information specified in RMC Section 4-8-1200. In addition, if the project involves an unclassified stream, a supplemental stream or lake study is also required (12 copies). If any alteration to a water-body or buffer is proposed a supplemental stream or lake study {12 copies) and a mitigation plan (12 copies) are also required. See RMC 4-8-1200 for plan content requirements. 25. 0 Habitat Data Report: If the project site contains or abuts a critical habitat per RMC 4-3- 0SOBSb, please provide 12 copies of a report containing the information specified in Section 4-8-1200 of the Renton Municipal Code. 26. D Flood Hazard Data: Please provide 12 copies of a scaled plan showing the nature, location, dimensions, and elevations of the area in question; existing or proposed structures, fill, storage of materials, and drainage facilities. Also indicate the following: • Elevation in relation to mean sea level of the lowest floor (including basement) of all structures • Elevation in relation to mean sea level to which any structure has been flood proofed • Certification by a registered professional engineer or architect that the flood proofing methods criteria in RMC 4-3-050 have been met -7 - H;\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\sa.doc 03/12 (\ (\ 3o.D 31.D from site Drainage Control Plan: Please provide 4 copies of a plan drawn to scale and stamped by a Washington State licensed professional engineer and complying with the requirements of Renton Municipal Code, Section 4-6-030 and the King County Surface Water Management Design Manual, 2009 edition, as adopted and amended by the City of Renton. Drainage Report: Please provide 4 copies of a report complying with the requirements of the City of Renton Drafting Standards, Section 4-6-030 of the City of Renton Municipal Code, the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), 2009 edition, and the City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWDM, Chapters 1 and 2 as adopted by the City of Renton. The report (TIR) must be stamped and dated by a civil engineer and shall contain the following: • Table of Contents • Technical Information Report (TIR) Worksheet Section 1: Project Overview • • • • • • • • • • Section 2: Conditions and Requirements Summary Section 3: Offsite Analysis Section 4: Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design Section 5: Conveyance System Analysis and Design Section 6: Special Reports and Studies Section 7: Other Permit Section 8: CSWPPP Analysis and Design Section 9: Bond Quantities, Facility Summaries, and Declaration of Covenant Section 10: Operations and Maintenance Manual. 32. D Traffic Study: Please provide 5 copies of a report prepared by a State of Washington licensed professional engineer containing the elements and information identified in the City of Renton "Policy Guidelines for Traffic Impact Analysis of New D_evelopment" in sufficient detail to define potential problems related to the proposed development and identify the improvements necessary to accommodate the development in a safe and efficient manner. 33. D Plan Reductions: Please provide one 8 Y." x 11" legible reduction of each full size plan sheet (unless waived by your Project Planner). The sheets that are always needed in reduced form are: landscape plans, conceptual utility plans, site plan or plat plan, neighborhood detail map, topography map, tree cutting/land clearing plan, critical areas plans, grading plan, and building elevations. These reductions are used to prepare public notice posters and to provide the public with information about the project. The quality of these reductions must be good enough so that a photocopy of the reduced plan sheet is also legible. The reduced plans are typically sent in PDF format to the print shop and then are printed on opaque white mylar-type paper (aka rhino cover) to ensure legibility. If your reduced plans are not legible once photocopied, you will need -9 - H:\CED\Data\Forrns-Templates\Salf-Help Handouts\Plannlng\sa.doc 03/12 ~ weeks, the Planning Division will prepare a report regarding the proposal's compliance with applicable ·\ codes and the City's review criteria. All applications requiring environmental review will be presented to the City's Environmental Review Committee. The Environmental Review Committee is comprised of the Administrator of Public Works, the Administrator of Community and Economic Development, the Administrator of Community Services, and the Fire Chief. The Committee is responsible for determining whether the proposal will result in significant adverse environmental impacts. To do this, the committee will consider such issues as environmental health hazards, wetlands, groundwater, energy and natural resources and will then issue its decision (Environmental Threshold Determination). The Environmental Review Committee will either issue a: • Determination of Non-Significance (DNS)-Make a determination the proposal will have no significant negative environmental impacts, or • Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (DNS-M)-Make a determination the proposal, if modified, would have no significant negative environmental impacts, or • Determination of Significance (DS)-Make a determination the proposal will have significant adverse environmental impacts and require the applicant to submit an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared by a qualified consultant. Once the Environmental Review Committee has issued its Environmental Threshold Determination (provided an EIS is not required), a public notice of the Determination is printed in the Renton Reporter and three notices are posted at or near the site. A 14-day appeal period commences following the publication date. At the discretion of the City, a separate and additional 15-day comment period may be added prior to the 14-day appeal period. In addition to issuing the Environmental Determination, the Environmental Review Committee is also charged with determining whether a public hearing should be required for those Site Plan proposals not automatically triggering a public hearing. The Environmental Review Committee will consider the departmental and public comments in determining whether or not a hearing should be required. This determination may be appealed within 14 days to the Hearing Examiner pursuant to Renton Municipal Code, Section 4-8-110. Projects exceeding the size limits listed in the Renton Municipal Code, Section 4- 9-20003 and projects abutting or <1cross the street from residential zones MUST have a public hearing. No variance from this requirement is possible. The remainder of the review process differs depending on whether a public hearing is required. Administrative Site Plan Review: A public hearing is not required. The Planning Division reviews the proposal for compliance with the requirements of RMC 4-9-200E, F in conjunction with the Environmental Review Committee decision and any staff or public comments prior to making a decision. The decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the proposal will be mailed to all persons listed on the Master Application and all parties of record. -11 - H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\sa.doc 03/12 Applicants may apply for building and construction permits concurrently with their request for a land r;:--=·\ use application. However, the applicant should be aware any conditions of land use permit approval may create a need for revisions to other permit applications whereby additional fees may be charged. Refunds of building permit charges are not available. If no appeals or reconsideration requests are filed within 14 days of the effective date of the decision to approve the application, the applicant may obtain building and construction permits. A construction permit for the installation of on-site and off-site utilities will be issued upon the review and approval of civil engineering drawings by the Division's Public Works Section and receipt of all applicable development and permit fees. A building permit will be issued upon the Building Section's approval of building plans and receipt of all applicable fees. ! DEFERRAL OF IMPROVEMENTS: _If a developer wishes to defer certain on-site or off-site improvements {i.e. landscaping, curbs and sidewalks), written application with full and complete engineering drawings ' must be submitted to the Planning Division. The application should explain the reasons why such delay is necessary. If approval is granted, security in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, set-aside fund, assignment of funds, certified check or other type of security acceptable to the City shall be furnished to the City in an amount equal to a minimum of 150% of the estimated cost of the required improvements. EXPIRATION AND EXTENSIONS: Once an application has been approved, the applicant has two years to comply with all conditions of approval and to apply for any necessary permits before the approval becomes null and void. The approval body that approved the original application may grant a single two- r·'\ year extension. The approval body may require a public hearing for such extension. -13 -03/12 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\sa.doc Kevin Carl ~ rom: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Clark Close <CC1ose@Rentonwa.gov> Thursday, December 15, 2016 10:20 AM 'Daniel Westley' Kevin Carl; Jill Ding RE: Not Applicable Submittal Items -Renton Special Care Community PRE16-000115 Categories: Red Category Dan, Please see answers below. Thanks, Clark H. Close Senior Planner City of Renton 425-430-7289 From: Daniel Westley [mailto:dwestley@ldccorp.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 4:40 PM ,-:ro: Clark Close c: Kevin Carl Subject: Not Applicable Submittal Items -Renton Special Care Community PRE16-000115 Hello Clark, Thank you for the information in our conversation this am. As promised, the following lists all submittal documents that are not applicable to the proposed project. These documents will not be required to be submitted in the upcoming Site Plan Review, Conditional Use, Environmental Review and Lot Combination intake. Please indicate if any of the items may require further justification. Submittal Items not applicable to the proposed development: • Site Plan Review (Rev: 8/2016): o 2.) Waiver Form -Waiver form is completed by st~ff at the pre-screen meeting. It's the official document that identifies what submittal documents would not be applicable to your project. o 12.) Urban Center Design Overlay District Report-Not applicable. o 14.) Affidavit of Installation of Public Outreach Sign(s) project valuation is less than 10 million -Not applicable. o 15.) Proof of Neighborhood Meeting project valuation is less than 10 million -Not applicable. o 17.) Overall Site Plan no previously approved master site plan -Not applicable. o 26.) Wetland Assessment na wetlands onsite as indicated in Critical Areas Assessment -Not applicable. o 27.) Standard Stream or Lake Study no stream or lakes onsite as indicated in the Critical Areas Assessment -Not applicable. o 28.) Flood Hazard Data no flood zone areo located near the site perFEMAfloodplain maps-Not applicable. o 29.) Biologica I Assessment site is not located in a designated floodplain -Not applicable. o 30.) Habitat Data Report site does not contain or abut a critical habitat -Not applicable. 1 o 32.) Letter of I erstanding Geologic Risk -proposed dev _ ment is not located in a geologic "unstable arean -Required. • Conditional Use Permit (Rev: 8/2016): o 22.) Wetland Assessment no wetlands onsite as indicated in Critical Areas Assessment-Not applicable. o 23.) Standard Stream or Lake Study no stream or lakes onsite as indicated in the Critical Areas Assessment-Not applicable. o 24.) Flood Hazard Data no flood zone area located near the site per FEMA floodplain maps -Not applicable. o 25.) Biologica I Assessment site is not located in a designated floodplain -Not applicable. o 26.) Habitat Data Report site does not contain or abut a critical habitat-Not applicable. o 28.) Letter of Understanding Geologic Risk-proposed development is not located in a geologic "unstable area" -Required. Can you please provide summary of the 2017 fee schedule or provide link? The 2017 -2018 Fee Schedule is available at http://www.rentonwa.gov/council/ (Resolution No. 4300). Pre-screening is scheduled for 10am Friday, December 23''. Can you confirm that Jill Ding is available at this time? Jill is not available at this time. Jill's office schedule is Monday and Thursday from 9:30 am to 2:30 pm. As always, feel free to call or email with any questions or concerns. Thanks, Dan Daniel E. Westley, PE ~ ?sign Engineer LDC, Inc The Civil Engineering Group T 425.806.1869 Ext.126 WE MOVED! 20210 142nd Ave NE Woodinville, WA 98072 www.LDCcorp.com dwestley@ldccorp.com "Engineering ABOVE the Standard" 2 Renton Special Care Community 17033 1081h Avenue SE Renton, WA 98157 Site Plan & Conditional Use Submittal Materials . \ ,' J!,N l ~· 2017 ; /,:, 2. Waiver Form DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT --------Renton® WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 I www.rentonwa.gov LAND USE PERMIT SUBMIITAL REQUIREMENTS: WAIVED MODIFIED BY: BY: Arborist Report 4 Biological Assessment 4 Calculations 1 . Colored Maps for Display 4 Construction Mitigation Description 2AN0, Deed of Right-of-Way Dedication 1 Density Worksheet 4 Drainage Control Plan 2 Drainage Report 2 Elevations, Architectural, ANo, Environmental Checklist 4 Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy) 1AN0, Existing Easements (Recorded Copy)''""' Flood Hazard Data 4 C,M-<-- Floor Plans, AND, Geotechnical Report 2AN0, Grading Elevations & Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Elevations & Plan, Detailed 2 Habitat Data Report 4 \R Improvement Deferral 2 Irrigation Plan 4 COMMENTS: .. -R_frvr ctv >',Pt:7 .. f// /.--c1rnf com11W/V1 TY PRDJECTNAME: T!IE ctrf7J6er /1-T ,R&,vr,vv DATE: It--( 2,2, / /0 1 . H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Waiversubmittalreqs.docx Rev:08/2015 LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITIAL REQUIREMENTS: WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: BY: BY: King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 Landscape Plan, Conceptual, Landscape Plan, Detailed 4 Legal Description 4 Letter of Understanding of Geological Risk 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions, Master Application Form 4 Monument Cards (one per monument) 1 Neighborhood Detail Map 4 . Overall Plat Plan 4 Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs), Post Office Approval 2 Plat Name Reservation 4 Plat Plan, Preapplication Meeting Summary 4 Public Works Approval Letter, . . Rehabilitation Plan 4 Screening Detail 4 Shoreline Tracking Worksheet, Site Plan ,,.o, Stream or Lake Study, Standard 4 CU--c....- Stream or Lake Study, Supplemental 4 Stream or Lake Mitigation Plan 4 Street Profiles 2 Title Report or Plat Certificate 1••0• Topography Mapa Traffic Study 2 Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan 4 Urban Design Regulations Analysis 4 ('A,I-../ Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 . Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Final 4 Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary 4 2 H :\CED\Data\Forms-Tem plates\Self-Help Ha ndo uts\Pla nning\ Waiversubm ittalreqs.docx Rev: 08/2015 1 ' ' • LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Wetlands Report/Delineation 4 Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement iANo, Inventory of Existing Sites 2AN0, Lease Agreement, Draft iAND3 Map of Existing Site Conditions ,AND 3 Map of View Area 2AN0, Photosimulations 2AN0, This Requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services 2 Development Engineering Plan Review 3 Building 4 Planning WAIVED MODIFIED BY: BY: C4K- 3 H: \CE D\Data \Forms-Templates \Self-He Ip H a n do uts \Plan n i ng\ Wa iversu b m itta l req s. docx COMMENTS: Rev:08/2015 Renton Special Care Community 17033 108th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98157 Site Plan & Conditional Use Submittal Materials 4. Fee's Summary DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY --------Renton® LAND USE PERMIT FEES AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 J www.rentonwa.gov JAN J ~1 2:JII *A 3% Technology Surcharge Fee (Resolution No 4071) will be added to eqihf(e -. . ~ .. I','" ',.· APPLICATION TYPE: FEE AMOUNT: Additional Animals Permit $50.00* Annexation No charge Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Decision, Administrative Decision, or $250.00 Environmental Decision Binding Site plan Approval (total fee for both preliminary and final $2,500.00* phases) Code Text Amendment No Charge Comprehensive Plan Map or Text Amendment $2,500.00* Conditional Use Permit ~5~ Hearing Examiner Review Administrative Review -,,~,u00.00 Critical Areas Review Fee 100% of costs of for those projects that propose impacts to critical areas' contract biologist's review' Environmental Impact Statement/Draft and Final 100% of costs of coordination, review a • .,;! ... ,......,ea is"' Environmental Checklist Review ('" $1,000.00* \ Fence Permit (special) .:).luv.UU"" Grading and Filling Permit (Hearing Examiner) $2,500.00* Landscape Review Fee $100.00 each request* Lot Line Adjustment $450.00* Manufactured/Mobile Home Park: Tentative $500.00* Preliminary $2,500.00* Final $1,000.00* Open Space Classification Request $100.00* Plats: Short Plat (total for both preliminary and final phases) $2,000.00* Preliminary Plat $4,500.00* Final Plat $1,500.00* Planned Urban Development: Preliminary $2,500.00* Final $1,000.00* 1 Per RMC 4-3-0SOF7, the City may charge and collect fees from any applicant to cover costs incurred by the City in review of plans, studies, monitoring reports and other documents related to evaluation of impacts to or hazards from critical areas and subsequent code-required monitoring. APPLICATION TYPE: FEE AMOUNT: Rezones $2,500.00* Routine Vegetation Management Permit (without critical areas) $75.00* Shopping Cart Plan Review $100.00* Shoreline -related Permits: Shoreline Permit Exemption No charge Shoreline Substantial Development Permit $2,000.00* Shoreline Conditional Use $2,500.00* Shoreline Variance $2,500.00* (each) Site Development Plan Approval: Hearing Examiner or Master Plan Site Plan Review C32,5o~ Administrative Site Plan Review $1,500.00* Modification (minor, administrative) No Charge Modification (major) New Application and New Fees Required Special Permit (Hearing Examiner) $2,500.00* Temporary Use Permit: Tier 1 $75.00* Tier2 $150.00* Tree Fee-in-Lieu $215.00 per caliper inch Variance (per each variance requested) $1,200.00* each Waiver or Modification of Code Requirements $150.00* each request Zoning Compliance Letter (effective 1-1-2015) $400.00* EXCEPTION FOR PROJECTS VESTED WITH KING COUNTY: For those projects that have vested to a land use permit under the development regulations of King County, the King County Land Use Review Fee Schedule shall apply as adopted by the City of Renton (Resolution 4071). EXTRA FEES: Whenever any application is to be handled under the terms of any portion of the City's land use codes, adopted codes, or the Uniform Building Code, and that application is so large, complicated or technically complex that it cannot be handled with existing city staff, then an additional fee can be charged which is equivalent to the extra costs incurred by the City of Renton. Such fees shall be charged only to the extent incurred beyond that normally incurred for processing an application. When the application or development plans are modified so as to require additional review by the City beyond the review normally required for like projects, at the discretion of the City, an additional fee may be charged at $75.00* per hour. Any questions regarding land use fees should be directed to the Planning Division, 6'" floor customer service counter, at (425) 430-7200, press #4. *A 3% Technology Surcharge Fee (Resolution No. 4071} will be added to each fee. 2 H: \ CE D \Data \Forms-Temp 1 ates \Self-He 1 p Handouts \Pian n ing\l and usef ee. doc Rev: 12/2015 Renton Special Care Community 170331081h Avenue SE Renton, WA 98157 Site Plan & Conditional Use Submittal Materials 5. Project Narrative MAGNET design. _evelopment 1631 15th Avenue W, Suite #21 I Seattle, WA 98119 2061778-4 726 Renton Special Care Community LLC "The Cottages at Renton" Project Narrative: • Project Name, Size and Location; Renton Special Care Community LLC 17033 I 08•h Avenue SE Renton WA 98055 Project Size is 16,445 SF • Land Use Permits Required for Proposed Project: Land Use Review Conditional Use Review SEPA • Zoning Designation of the site and adjacent properties: 1115/16 The project site is zones R-14 I Residential High Density, the sites to our north and E are R-14, The south lots across SE/ 72nd St is RMF, to our west the lots are Residential Medium Density and R-8. • Current Use of the site and any existing improvements -the site is two parcels, parcel A is presently occupied by a single-family dwelling and detached single car garage. There is a wood shed on parcel B. • Special Site Features (i.e. wetlands, water bodies, steep slopes) -NA • Statement addressing soil types and drainage conditions -The site is primarily made up of sandy soils, gravels and medium to high density Vashon till. There is little no infiltration with most surface water moving horizontal across the site to the swale in the SW corner along SE I 72,d St • Proposed Use of the property and scope of the proposed development-The proposed project is to be a 60-bed convalescent home situated in 4-cottage structures. • For Plats indicate the proposed number, net density and range of sizes (net lot area) of the new lots -NA • Access -site access will primarily from I 08th Avenue SE with a secondary service access located off the SE 172,d St side of the site. • Proposed off-site improvements (sidewalks, fire hydrants, sewer main, etc.) - the off-site improvements shall include all required street ROW improvements identified by the City; sidewalks, street lights, street trees, signage, hydrants, sidewalk ramps etc. I IP age MAGNET design~uevelopment 1631 15th Avenue W, Suite #21 I Seattle, WA 981 19 206/778-4 726 1/15/16 • Total estimated construction cost & estimated fair market value of the proposed project -the construction costs are anticipated to be $4.4-4.6 Million. The fair market value of the project after completion is estimated to be $7.6-8.5 Million • Estimated quantities and type of materials involved in any fill or excavation is proposed -the estimated quantity of (,II is I ,5 00 yds. Though the project is designed to be as balanced as possible the type of existing soil may require the import of clean structural (,If to replace the unsuitable or over hydrated soils encountered during construction. • Number, type, and size of any trees to be removed -see the Tree Retention Wark Sheet & Arborists Report • Explanation of any land to be dedicated to the City -Right of way dedication along both I 08th Avenue SE and SE I 72°d ST. • Any proposed job shacks, sales trailers, and model homes -I 8' x 40' construction trailer will be present on site during the construction phase of the project • Any proposed modifications being requested (including written justification) for projects located within I 00 feet of a stream, or wetland, please include distance in feet from the wetland or stream to the nearest area of work for projects located within 200-ft of Black River, Cedar River, Springbrook Creek, etc. -None I NA • Distance from Closest Area of work to ordinary high water mark -NA • Description of the nature of the existing shore line -NA • The approximate location of and number of residential units, existing and potential that will have an obstructed view in the event the proposal project exceeds the height of 35-ft above the average grade level. -None, the project will not exceed the 35-Ft height General Project Summary The proposed Renton Special Care Community project shall contain three residential one story cottages which will accommodate a total of 42 resident rooms for a total capacity of up to 60 dementia residents (Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and other memory related ailments). In addition to the residential cottages the campus will also include a central Administrative cottage. This cottage program contains spaces for the administrative office suite and reception area, supporting a general manager, licensed nurse, marketer, activities director, The Administrative Cottage also houses our central commercial kitchen with a pantry and commercial laundry room. This area includes space for the cook's office, staff lockers, toilet room, dry and cold storage and scullery. The operation of the community provides all resident meal that are prepared by the chef in the commercial kitchen and delivered using hot box carts to each of the residential cottages. All soiled dishes are returned to the Commercial kitchens scullery for cleaning. 21Page MAGNET design. wevelopment 1631 15th Avenue W, Suite #21 I Seattle, WA 98119 206/778-4726 I 115116 The community's central laundry facility provides for the washing of all the residents bedding, towels and day to day clothing and is managed by facility staff. Each of the resident cottages also have a stacked pair of residential grade front load washer dryers. These are required by WAC regulations per our DSHS licensing and are intended to be used only by a resident for their family caregiver for their own personnel laundry needs. It is our experience, operating four other similar communities that this amenity is very rarely used since the facility provided laundry service is significantly more convenient. The four-building campus are connected by as 7'-0" cedar stockade fence with controlled entry gates, which contain a secure landscaped central courtyard which is freely accessed by community resident, staff and visitors alike. The courtyard provides outdoor patios, covered seating movable tables and chairs, art and a rich assortment of nontoxic trees and fiowering plants accessible by walkway paths. The goal of the overall facility design is to create a "family-like" living community where individual residents share the common areas of the campus while still maintaining their own personal space and privacy. The projected staff is anticipated to employ up to 27 full time equivalents (FTE's) working in three shifts with a maximum staff of 12 at any given time. A typical resident is anticipated to be between 70 and 85 years old, with a female to male ratio of about 60:40 with slight fiuctuations in this ratio over time. The typical length of stay is approximately one year. The resident's family usually lives within the general area 75% of the time. None of our resident has or operates a motor vehicle and they do not utilize public transit or off site community facilities such as libraries or parks. In addition to the primary functions of providing housing, meals and laundry services the facility provides the residents assistance with activities for daily living (ADLs). AOL help is specific to each resident and determined through a care plan which is designed by the nurse and administered by the CNAs on a scheduled basis. This care covers such things as help with dressing, bathing, and medication management but does not include functions usually administered in skill nursing facilities such as intravenous injections or other more intensive medical treatments. All Food Service for the campus is to be coordinated, prepared plated and delivered to the residential cottages via heated food cart. Once meals are completed in each cottages plates, utensils and glassware used for the meal are bused back to the commercial kitchen and delivered to the scullery for proper washing. Each cottage has as part of the day room an auxiliary kitchen which is provided to give the space a home like feel. But this kitchenette also includes a full-size refrigerator and micro wave oven. This appliance is not intended for the preparation of the resident's daily meals but rather as support to rewarming meals, making coffee/tea and light pre-prepared snacks. The facility will be licensed by the State of Washington through the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) as a boarding home licensure. 31Page MAGNET design,uevelopment 1631 15th Avenue W, Suite #21 I Seattle, WA 981 19 206/778-4 726 SITE LAYOUT, PARKING AND ACCESS 1115/16 The total built space for the cottage campus is approximately 17,725 gross square feet. Total site area is 66,000 square feet with a 45 percent Lot coverage. Approximately 12,000 square feet of landscaped courtyard is provided. A 7'-0" tall security fence is provided around the cottages and the court yard to assure safety for residents while allowing for emergency access. Renton Design Development Standards require one parking stall per 4 beds and one stall per employee (60 beds/4= 15 + IO for employees for a total of 25 required stalls. It is proposed to provide 21-24 parking stalls including 2 handicapped stalls ( I HC van stall). A drop off area is located adjacent to the main facility entry. Edit to reflect reduction Circulation internal to the project is provided by paved sidewalks along the parking lot and within the landscaped courtyard. A single vehicle entry egress access is proposed from I 08th Ave SE and located at the east side of the parking area. A secondary access driveway is available from the south side of the site off SE 172°' Street. The purpose of this access drive is primarily as a service drive for emergency vehicles, deliveries to the kitchen/laundry room, mail and packages for the administration office and for visitors who arrive from the SE 172°' Street corridor and trash removal. D Key Individuals: Facility Administrator: CarePartners Management Group LLC, 7900 SE 28th St Suite 416, Mercer Island, WA 98040 p. 206-230-0900 Facility Contact: Staff Person in charge-TBD Project Manager Consultant Information: Kevin Carl, Magnet design+development (Md+d) 163 I 15th Avenue W, Suite 21 I Seattle, WA 981 19 p. 206/778-4726 kevin@magnet-dd.com Design Professional in Responsible Charge: David Fey, AJA JENSEN FEY ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING P.S. architecture I planning I interior design 7730 Leary Way Redmond, WA 98052 DAVID FEY 425-216-0318 x 311 P I 425-216-0329 F I 206-979-2994 C davidf@jensenfey.com 41Page Renton Special Care 1 munity 17033 1081' Avenue SE Renton, WA 98157 Site Plan & Conditional Use Submittal Materials 6. Environmental Checklist DEPARTMENT OF CO,v,MUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT --------Renton 8 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 I www.rentonwa.gov PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision-making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. INSTRUCTIONS FOR LEAD AGENCIES: Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: lb_gJQ_j For non-project proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic 1 C:\Users\Kevin\Google Drive\Kevin Projects\Renton SCC\Environment Reports\RSCC -SEPA Environmental Checklist draft 12- 13-16.doc Rev: 08/2016 area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non-projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements -that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. A. BACKGROUND~ 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: The Cottages at Renton 2. Name of applicant: Renton Special Care Community LLC 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Magnet design+development 1631 lS'h Avenue W, Suite 211, Seattle, WA 98119 Kevin Corl, project manager, 206/778-4 726 4. Date checklist prepared: December 13, 2016 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Department of Community and Economic Development 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Proposed Start of Construction -April/May 2017 -single Phase unless we proceed with site grading and drainage work first. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No, this will be a complete project. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Geotechnical Analysis, Phase I EIS, Hazardous Materials Survey, Critical Areas Assessment. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. NA 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. - Washington State Department of Health CRS, Approval to begin Construction, DSHS -Boarding Home Operation License 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on 2 C:\Users\Kevin\Google Drive\Kevin Projects\Renton SCC\Environment Reports\RSCC-$EPA Environmental Checklist draft 12- 13·16.doc Rev: 08/2016 project description.) Construct a campus of 4-single story wood frame cottages to house and support 60 residents living with dementia and loss of memory related issues. Three cottages will serve as residential living quarters and one cottage will be for the admin and support facilities. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries ofthe site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit, any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Parcel A: Tax Parcel 00870000293 South Half of lot 15, block 4 of Akers Farm No. 5, According to the Plat Thereof Recorded in Volume 40 of Plats, Page 27, Records of King County, Washington. Parcel B Tax Parcel 0087000285 Lot 14, Block 4 of Akers Farm No. 5, According to the Plat Thereof Recorded in Volume 40 of Plats, Page 27 Records of King County, Washington. 3 C:\Users\Kevin\Google Drive\Kevin Projects\Renton SCC\Environment Reports\RSCC -SEPA Environmental Checklist draft 12- 13-16.doc Rev: 08/2016 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS i!J.gJQ.] 1. EARTH a. General description of the site 1!J.g!Q.] (check or circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Mostly Flat, slightly tilted to the Southwest corner b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 7% grade c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. f!:!g!Q.] The underlying top soil -the native soils consist of primarily silty sand with gravel, below that is medium dense to dense Vashon glacial till. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. f!:!g!Q.] No e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. f!:!g!Q.] There is an abandon and sand filled inground swing pool that will need to be excavated and replaced with new structural fill. The proposal also includes significant excavation to install the necessary stormwater detention vault system. This include approximately 424 LF of 96" detention pipe which is estimated to displace 200 CY of fill. The grading plan call for using the majority of this material for our back fill and regrading of the site. f. Could erosion occur because of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. There is always the potential for erosion resulting from site construction. Our Civil engineer has anticipated this and design the appropriate best practice measures in our Erosion Control Plans and SW PPP to minimize any adverse impacts to the site and its surrounding areas. 4 C:\Users\Kevin\Google Drive\Kevin Projects\Renton SCC\Environrnent Reports\RSCC-SEPA Environmental Checklist draft 12- 13-16.doc Rev; 08/2016 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?~ The allowable percentage of impervious surfaces is 80%, our project is below this at approximately 64% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, ifany:~ All necessary best practice measures will be employed as needed to minimize adverse erosion control impacts; these may include -silt fences, straw waddles, felt sox's in drains, covering soil stockpiles, frequent street sweeping etc. 2. Al R I..b..fil21 a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.~ No extra ordinary air impacts are envisioned as part of this construction project beyond those typically experiences such as diesel exhaust, dust and smells from paint, asphalt etc. This are all temporary and will be kept to a minimum by the project General Contractors scheduling and oversight. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe.~ No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:~ Require equipment operators to turn off engines while idle, using water soluble paints and solvent solutions to minimize fumes. 3. WATER l..!:!fill2l a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. l..!:!fill2l No s C:\Users\Kevin\Google Drive\Kevin Projects\Renton SCC\Environment Reports\RSCC -SEPA Environmental Checklist draft 12- 13-16.doc Rev: 08/2016 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. lb.g]Ql NO 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. lb.g]Ql NA 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. lb.g]Ql No S) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. lb.g]Ql No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. lb.g]Ql No -not anticipated at this time b. Ground Water: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. lb.g]Ql No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. lb.g]Ql NA 6 C:\Users\Kevin\Google Drive\Kevin Projects\Renton SCC\Environment Reports\RSCC -SEPA Environmental Checklist draft 12- 13-16.doc Rev: 08/2016 c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.~ No, run off will be managed on site during construction and filtered prior to migration off site. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.~ No, not anticipated on site, BMP's shall be employed by project GC to prevent any impacts 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe.~ NO d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any:~ The project engineer's erosion control plan SWPPP will include all the necessary erosion control design elements and detail to specifically address this. The City of Renton will thoroughly review these plans prior to approving our permit for construction. 4. PLANTS lb_g]Q] a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site:~ Yes -deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other Yes -evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other Yes -shrubs Yes -grass No -pasture No -crop or grain No -orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. No -wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other No -water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other NA-other types of vegetation 7 C:\Users\Kevln\Google Drive\Kevin Projects\Renton SCC\Environment Reports\RSCC-SEPA Environmental Checklist draft 12- 13-16.doc Rev: 08/2016 b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Ib.!tlr!J The site will be cleared of nearly all ground cover and trees that conflict with the proposed site design. Please see the City of Renton Tree Retention Worksheet and Arborists Report prepared by our Project Landscape Architect. c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. I.b..fil21 None have been identified during our site investigation d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Ib.!tlr!J Yes, it is our design intent to plant a significant amount of native plants and trees as part of our site restoration following the building construction. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. I.b..fil21 The most prevalent seen was Himalayan Blackberry. Our plan is to completely remove this evasive from our landscape areas. 5. ANIMALS~ a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. _lli_gJ_Ql Examples include: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, other: Crow, songbirds Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Squirrel, Racoons Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: NA b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. I.b..fil21 None have been observed or noted. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.~ Yes, the Cascade Flyway 8 C:\Users\Kevin\Google Drive\Kevin Projects\Renton SCC\Environment Reports\RSCC -SEPA Environmental Checklist draft 12- 13-16.doc Rev: 08/2016 d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:~ Our site development includes an extensive landscape restoration. The plans and trees proposed are designed to encourage and support the local bird and insect populations. e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site.~ Domestic dogs and cats have been observer in the surrounding area 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES~ a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.~ Heating shall be provided by both natural gas and electric energy sources depending on the location and use. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. ~ NO c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:~ This project is design to meet or exceed the 2016 Washington State energy code for envelope, lighting, equipment and water conservation. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Ihtll;tl a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Ihtll;tl None that we are aware of. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. Ihtll;tl None, we performed soil testing during our ESA investigations and found the site clear of any contaminants. 9 C:\Users\Kevin\Google Drive\Kevin Projects\Renton SCC\Environment Reports\RSCC-SEPA Environmental Checklist drah 12- 13-16.doc Rev: 08/2016 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. l!:!tl!!.] None that we know of at this time. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. l!:!tl!!.] I am not aware of any specific toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be used by Our General contractor or sub-contractors. I do know we have strict protocols to maintain a clean site so our General will be vigilant in keeping the use of these kinds of materials away for our project. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. l!:!tl!!.] Given the age and frailty of our proposed resident population, ambulance service would be the typical emergency service. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: l!:!tl!!.] Eye wash stations where cleaning with cleaning and sanitizing chemicals are handled. Lockable storage of all of these areas. Minimizing stockpiling of any excess cleaning and sanitizing products on site. b . N o is e l!:!tl!!.] 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? l!:!tl!!.] Traffic and yard maintenance equipment noise. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.~ Construction noise will be evident during the proposed 10-11 months of work. The levels should be those typical to standard construction. We won't be driving piles, of 10 C:\Users\Kevin\Google Drive\Kevin Projects\Renton SCC\Environment Reports\RSCC -SEPA Environmental Checklist draft 12- 13-16.doc Rev: 08/2016 blasting bed rock so it's trucks, saws and hammering. The city prescribes the allowable hours of work to be typically Monday -Saturday 8:00AM -7:00PM 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: .[hg_JQ] Efficient construction scheduling and prevention of idle trucks and equipment from running when not in service. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE .[hg_JQ] a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe . .[hg_JQ] The sites current use is single family residential. Our neighbors are the same to the north and west. We have multi-family across 10s•h Ave to the east and a day care facility /multifamily development to the south. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or non-forest use? .[hg_JQ] No/NA 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: .[hg_JQ] No/NW c. Describe any structures on the site . .[hg_JQ] I single story wood frame house with a 1-car garage and detached wood shed. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? .[hg_JQ] Yes, all of them e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? .[hg!Ql R-1 11 C:\Users\Kevin\Google Drlve\Kevin Projects\Renton SCC\Environment Reports\RSCC -SEPA Environmental Checklist draft 12- 13-16.doc Rev: 08/2016 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? lb_gJQ] tbd g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? .[hg!Q} NA h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify . .[hg!Q} No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? .[hg!Q} 60 new residents & +/-12 employees j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? .[hg!Q} 2 -but the house was vacant when acquired k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: .[hg!Q} NA I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: .[hg!Q} The project will be required to be approved under the City of Renton's Site Plan and Conditional Use Review. This process ensures that the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding community. m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long- term commercial significance, if any:~ NA 9. HOUSING .[hg!Q} a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing . .[hg!Q} 12 C:\Users\Kevin\Google Drive\Kevin Projects\Renton SCC\Environment Reports\RSCC -SEPA Environmental Checklist draft 12- 13-16.doc Rev: 08/2016 Our project has a total resident capacity of 60 beds. The majority of these will be available to middle income residents but a portion shall also be occupied by upper and lower income residents. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. lhfil2.l I -middle income unit c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 1hfil2.l Add higher density to the site, community. 10. AESTHETICS 1hfil2.l a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 1hfil2.l Approximately 30' above grade b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? 1hfil2.l NA c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 1hfil2.l NA 11. LIGHT AND GLARE 1hfil2.l a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? 1hfil2.l All exterior lighting shall be shielded from allowing light migration and glare beyond the property boundaries. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? 1hfil2.l No we don't believe so at this time. 13 C:\Users\Kevin\Google Drive\Kevin Projects\Renton SCC\Environment Reports\RSCC-SEPA Environmental Checklist draft 12- 13-16.doc Rev: 08/2016 c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? lli!tlQj Street Lights on 1ogth - d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: lli!tlQj Provide design perimeter planting of trees and shrubs. 12. RECREATION lli!tlQj a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? lli!tlQj Parks School yard. -NA since due to their health condition, our residents will not be leaving the site for outside recreation. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. lli!tlQ] No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: lli!tlQ] NA 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION lb_gJQ_] a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If so, specifically describe. lli!tlQ] Only single family residents and these are likely from the late 40's to 1970. None of any unique historic value. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. lli!tlQ] NO c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the 14 C:\Users\Kevin\Google Drive\Kevin Projects\Renton SCC\Environment Reports\RSCC-SEPA Environmental Checklist draft 12- 13-16.doc Rev: 08/2016 department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. Ib..tl0 NA-As far as I'm aware, this is not required on private land using private financing. -if during construction something unusual is found, we shall report this to the State SHPO and Archaeological Office for further investigation. d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. Ib..tl0 NA for this project 14. TRANSPORTATION 1b..tl0 a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Ib..tl0 Access from the East is 1081h Avenue SE & SE 112nd St from the South (Site Plan is attached) b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? 1b..tl0 Yes, there are Community Transit bus stops on 108thAve SE within 300' of the project site c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? 1b..tl0 26 new proved -2 lost d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Ib..tl0 NO e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. lhtlri) NO lS C:\Users\Kevin\Google Drive\Kevin Projects\Renton SCC\Environment Reports\RSCC-SEPA Environmental Checklist draft 12- 13-16.doc Rev: 08/2016 -......... --· • ll'{}d 31JS r;,:;oao VM 'NOlNJll 'JS .11 01 ffOLJ AllNnl'll'IOO 3HVO 1V103dS NO.lN3l:I :m 'A.ur,mrirmo 3WO lVI03dS NOlN3H .... 9 ~ D.. ! en I f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and non-passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? l.b_g]Ql 150 average trips per day, Gibson Traffic Consultants Traffic Analysis Study dated 6/2016 -ITE trip generation manual 9th edition. g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. l.b_g]Ql NO h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: l.b_g]Ql Employees shall have Employer provided bus passes for their daily commutes 15. PUBLIC SERVICES l.b_g]Ql a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. l.b_g]Ql We do not anticipate this project will use increased public service from other uses. If anything, it may require more frequent ambulance emergency aid cars. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. l.b_g]Ql Our communities are staffed 24/7 and will proactively respond to resident health needs as they occur. With the emphasis to minimize emergency situations from occurring. 16. UTILITIES l.b_g]Ql a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: l.b_g]Ql electricity, natural gas, -we will provide an extension from PSE to serve the project water, refuse service, 16 C:\Users\Kevin\Google Drive\Kevin Projects\Renton SCC\Environment Reports\RSCC-SEPA Environmental Checklist draft 12- 13-16.doc Rev: 08/2016 telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, NO other -Comcast date, internet, cable b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed . .l!J.g!Q1 This project shall be connecter to all available municipal utility and private franchise services necessary to function efficiently. This include Sewer, Water, Stormwater, Natural gas, telecom, cable, trash and recycling and electricity. C. SIGNATURE .l!J.gjQ1 The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Proponent Signature: ~ Name of Signee (printed): Kevin Carl Position and Agency/Organization: Project Manager Date Submitted: ----------- 17 C:\Users\Kevin\Google Drive\Kevin Projects\Renton SCC\Environment Reports\RSCC -SEPA Environmental Checklist draft 12- 13-16.doc Rev: 08/2016 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON PROJECT ACTIONS Ih!tl!:tl I (IT 15 NOT NECESSARY to use these sheets for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware ofthe extent the proposal or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 18 C:\Users\Kevin\Google Drive\Kevin Projects\Renton SCC\Environment Reports\RSCC-SEPA Environmental Checklist draft 12- 13-16.doc Rev: 08/2016 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. 19 C:\Users\Kevin\Google Drive\Kevin Projects\Renton SCC\Environment Reports\RSCC -SEPA Environmental Checklist draft 12- 13-16.doc Rev: 08/2016 Renton Special Care munity 17033 1081h Avenue SE Renton, WA 98157 Site Plan & Conditional Use Submittal Materials MN 1 ii 2:l17 CffY Of Kl::IITOi\J '· 11 /\t\JNIN(; lJIVISIO:\J 8. Density Worksheet DEPARTMENT 01-__ MMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT --------Renton 0 DENSITY WORKSHEET Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 I www.rentonwa.gov 1. Gross area of property -~0~5,~r~'2~1-square feet 2. Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. These include: Public Streets* ? 6/1r Jr square feet Private access easements* Critical Areas** a square feet ___ /_,.,__ __ __ __,{{~--square feet Total excluded area: 3. Subtract line 2 (total excluded area) from line 1 for net area 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage 5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density *Alleys (public or private} do not have to be excluded. '7;SU4f/ square feet &Z Z~J _ __,,,,]i ... ~'+-'~,_! _ square feet ,. or /.~3 Y,J I acres -~~~--- /? " units/lots ~~( v~. q::-5~ --~'--'-·---1--·.,,· ~-= dwelling units/acre **Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands, or floodways." Critical Areas buffers are not deducted/excluded. 1 C:\Users\Kevin\Google Drive\Kevin Projects\Renton SCC\City Permits\Checklist items\RSCC density Worksheet App.doc Rev: 08/2015 Renton Special Care C ..... 1unity 17033 1081h Avenue SE Renton, WA 98157 Site Plan & Conditional Use Submittal Materials , ·. i :; ' :·,( 'J 7. Rezone, Variance, Modification, or Conditional Use Justification: .. MAGNET design+devel _ ,-_ ent 163115th Avenue W, Suite #211 Seattle, WA 98119 Renton Special Care Community 17033 108'h Avenue SE Renton WA 98055 1/18/17 Conditional Use Permit Justification {12 Copies)-describe the reasons in favor of the Application and address the criteria used by the reviewing official in analyzing the application. • Consistency with Plans and Regulations: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance and any other plans, programs, maps or ordinances of the City of Renton. -the site is zoned Rl4, so our proposed 60 bed, 4-cottage campus is consistent with the intent of the City's design, density and residential character of the underlying zoning. The project is to serve as a convalescent center which automatically triggers the conditional use review. We have crafted our campus scale and aesthetic approach specifically to fit harmoniously within the surrounding residential context. Further, by keeping the design of the residential cottages as single level structures keeps the overall scale consistent with our neighbors while forming a secure interior courtyard that provide a safe and private indoor/outdoor living experience for our residents. The site is further enhanced by providing generous landscaping to restore the site and allows the project to knit itself back into the overall fabric of the neighboring lots. • Appropriate Location: The proposed location shall not result in the detrimental overconcentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposed location shall be suited for the proposed use. -Prior to selecting and purchasing the project site, we commissioned a market analysis by Wright Mature Marketing Inc. to determine the specific market needs and to identify the existing supply of convalescent center housing in the Renton area. This study determined that there is a sufficient need existing in the City of Renton and a current shortage of existing supply in the Renton highlands areas. The 60-bed resident capacity our project is based on this analysis and is targeted to service approximately 65% of the outstanding need. • Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. -Per our proposal, the overall site shall be generously landscaped with a wide variety of native plans, flowering plants, shrubs and trees to further soften the building presents towards the street frontage and our adjacent neighbors. The plant and tree pallet is also design to foster bird and other ground animal's habitat. • Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the scale and character of the neighborhood. -The Renton Special Care Community is scaled to integrate harmoniously within a single family and town home multifamily neighborhood surrounding our site. The 4 cottages campus that define the community consists of single level wood framed structures, the pallet of exterior building materials are constant with those used on the newly constructed Field Brook MAGNET design+devel ent 163115th Avenue W, Suite #211 Seattle, WA 98119 1/18/17 Commons town home development across 108th Avenue SE. Due to the memory challenges our residents live with our community circulation and activities are focused inward with residents remaining confined within the residential building or in the secure courtyard area. Building colors will be contemporary and friendly to reflect an inviting residential feel vs a commercial character. • Parking: Adequate parking is, or will be made, available. -Our residents do not drive and we operate with a staff of approximately 12 FTE's at any specific time during a 24-hour period. We have typically provided 20-26 parking spaces in our existing facilities of similar size and have found that to be sufficient to meet the facilities staff, service and family visitation needs. • Traffic: The use shall ensure safe movement for vehicles and pedestrians and shall mitigate potential effects on the surrounding area. -As with all of our communities we prepare a parking analysis study to identify the possible impacts the project will have on the surrounding area. The projects low concentration of 150 average daily trips and estimated 12 average peak hour trip show that this project will have a minimal impact on the surrounding road network. • Noise, Light and Glare: Potential noise, light and glare impacts from the proposed use shall be evaluated and mitigated. -All the site lighting shall be shielded and downward facing to minimize or prevent off site trespass of glare or light. We provide a 6' cedar good neighbor fence along the north and west property lines we share with single family residences and the prescribed landscape buffer to minimize noise and visual disturbances on our neighbors. The secure courtyard will further shield light, noise and glare from moving beyond the core area of the project site. • Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by buildings, paving, or critical areas. Additional landscaping may be required to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. -Our landscape architectural team is highly skilled at creating lively and interesting site restorations that promote bird and animal habitat, seasonal color and fragrance variations as well as interesting foliage changes. The setback buffers included in our site design shall ensure that any impacts to our neighboring site will be minimal. ~--------------------- MAGNET desig velopment 163 I 15th Avenue W, Suite #21 I Seattle, WA 981 19 206/778-4726 Renton Special Care Community PROPOSED PROJECT ZONING & LANDUSE ZONING: SITE AREA: BUILDABLE AREA: LAND USE: NUMBER OF SLEEPING ROOMS: NUMBER OF RESIDENTS: NUMBER PARKING STALLS: Rl4 65,761 SF (1.51 ACRES) 51,761 SF (l.188ACREAS) Convalescent Home 4 -SINGLE STORY "COTTAGES" w/ SOG (3 Residential, I commercial) 43 60 24-26 (INCLUDING 2 HC) Renton Special Care Community 17033 1081h Avenue SE Renton, WA 98157 Site Plan & Conditional Use Submittal Materials JI ',, ' ' ~;'; t i: (;JfY (;.f R l:: Y() N FLA.N[\'if\'C L);\/ISION 9. Plat Certificate or Title Report J Faflu1f!l£'5 vi/6qp~ c,/41/ ~ "?UfP5tr/).ft:,,/~- Rainier Title Title Team Brenda McCoy, Unit Manager Don Peters, Senior Title Officer• Genevieve Tomberg, Senior Title Officer Ronda Mills, Title Officer • Rhonda Caton, Assistant Title Officer JoAnn Leadley, Assistant Title Officer • Edwin Febus, Assistant Title Officer King/Snohomish Direct: (888) 929-1999 King/Snohomish Direct: (425)-551-5501 or Pierce Direct: (253) 671-1120 Fax: (206) 230-7779 or (425) 339-2491 or (253) 476-3700 Email: TheTitleTeam@RainierTitle.com SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT NO. 1 TO FIRST REPORT Order Number: 701299RT Escrow Number: Loan Number: Buyer/Borrower: Round Lake LLC, and/or assigns Property Address: 17033 108th Avenue S.E., Renton, WA 98055 Exception Number(s) 13 & 14 (are) hereby deleted from the above referenced Commitment. Rainier Title, Agent for Stewart Title Guaranty Company By: Brenda L. McCoy, Unit Manager Dated: May 13, 2016 ~RainferTitle 100% locally Owned and Operated Rainier Title King/Snohomish Direct: (888) 929-1999 King/Snohomish Fax: (206) 230-7779 or (425) 339-2491 Pierce Direct: (253) 671-1120 Pierce Fax: (253) 476-3700 Email: TheTitleTeam@RainierTitle.com 1501 4th Avenue, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98101 Escrow Closer: Bobbe Frederick ( 425)409-9096 bobbef@rainiertitle.com SECOND REPORT SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: April 26, 2016 at 8:00 A.M. 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: AL TA Standard Coverage Owner's Policy (06/2006) ST -General Schedule Electronic Proposed Insured: To Be Determined AL TA Extended Coverage Loan Policy (06/2006) ST -Lenders Extended Proposed Insured: To Be Determined Order Number: 700161 RT Amount: To Be Determined Premium: To Be Determined Sales Tax: To Be Determined Amount: To Be Determined Premium: To Be Determined Sales Tax: To Be Determined 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this commitment is: FEE SIMPLE 4. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land is at the Effective Date vested in: George W. Subic and Frances Mary Subic, husband and wife (as to Parcel A) Margery Subic, as a separate estate (as to Parcel B) 5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described in Exhibit A. Rainier Title, Agent for Stewart Title Guaranty Company Brenda McCoy, Unit Manager Page 1 EXHIBIT A Parcel A: Lot 14, Block 4, Aker's Farm No. 5, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 40 of Plats, page 27, records of King County, Washington. Parcel B: The South half of Lot 15, Block 4, Ake r's Farm No. 5, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 40 of Plats, page 27, records of King County, Washington. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. End of Schedule A Page 2 SCHEDULE B PARTI I. The following are the requirements to be complied with: A. Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. B. Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record. NOTE: Effective January 1, 1997, and pursuant to amendment of Washington state statutes relating to standardization of recorded documents, the following format and content requirements must be met. Failure to comply may result in rejection of the document by the recorder. FORMAT: • Margins to be 3" on top of first page, 1" on sides and bottom, 1" on top, sides and bottom of each succeeding page. • Font size of 8 points or larger and paper size of no more than 8 Y," by 14". • No attachments on pages such as stapled or taped notary seals, pressure seals must be smudged. INFORMATION WHICH MUST APPEAR ON THE FIRST PAGE: • Title or titles of document. If assignment or reconveyance, reference to auditor's file number or subject deed of trust. • Names of grantor(s) and grantee(s) with reference to additional names on following page(s), if any. • Abbreviated legal description (lot, block, plat name or section, township, range and quarter section for unplatted). • Assessor's tax parcel number(s). • Return address which may appear in the upper left hand 3" top margin. II. Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of the satisfaction of the Company: A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records, or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this commitment. B. Any policy issued pursuant hereto will contain the Exclusions From Coverage and, under Schedule B, the standard exceptions as set forth and identified as to the type of policy on the attached Schedules of Exclusions and Exceptions. End of Schedule B Part I Page3 SCHEDULE B PART II General Exceptions: Order Number: 700161 RT Schedule B Exceptions appearing in ALTA Owner's Policy (6/17/06)-Standard Coverage and ALTA Loan Policy (6/17/06)-Standard Coverage: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. 2. (i) Unpatented mining claims; (ii) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (iii) water rights, claims or title to water; whether or not the matters described in (i), (ii), & (iii) are shown in the public records; (iv) Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. 3. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 4. Easements, claims of easements or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 5. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises and which are not shown by the public records. 6. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 7. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, tap, capacity, construction or reimbursement charges for sewer, water, electricity or other utilities, or for garbage collection and disposal. 8. Any titles or rights asserted by anyone, including but not limited to persons, corporations, governments, or other entities, to tidelands, or lands comprising the shores or bottoms of navigable rivers, lakes, bays, ocean or gulf, or lands beyond the line of the harbor or bulkhead lines as established or changed by the United States Government, or riparian rights, if any. 9 Minerals of whatsoever kind, subsurface and surface substances, including but not limited to coal, lignite, oil, gas, uranium, clay, rock, sand and gravel in, on, under and that may be produced from the Land, together with all rights, privileges, and immunities relating thereto, whether or not appearing in the Public Records or listed in Schedule B. The Company makes no representation as to the present ownership of any such interests. There may be leases, grants, exceptions or reservations of interests that are not listed. Schedule B Exceptions appearing in ALTA Owner's Policy (6/17/06)-Extended Coverage: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. 2. (i) Unpatented mining claims; (ii) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (iii) water rights, claims or title to water; whether or not the matters described in (i), (ii), & (iii) are shown in the public records; (iv) Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. 3. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, tap, capacity, construction or reimbursement charges for sewer, water, electricity or other utilities, or for garbage collection and disposal. 4. Any titles or rights asserted by anyone, including but not limited to persons, corporations, governments, or other entities, to tidelands, or lands comprising the shores or bottoms of navigable rivers, lakes, bays, ocean or gulf, or lands beyond the line of the harbor or bulkhead lines as established or changed by the Unites States Government, or riparian rights, if any. 5 Minerals of whatsoever kind, subsurface and surface substances, including but not limited to coal, lignite, oil, gas, uranium, clay, rock, sand and gravel in, on, under and that may be produced from the Land, together with all rights, privileges, and immunities relating thereto, whether or not appearing in the Public Records or listed in Schedule B. The Company makes no representation as to the present ownership of any such interests. There may be leases, grants, exceptions or reservations of interests that are not listed. Schedule B Exceptions appearing in ALTA Loan Policy (6/17/06) and AL TA Homeowner's Policy Of Title Insurance (02/03/10) 1 Minerals of whatsoever kind, subsurface and surface substances, including but not limited to coal, lignite, oil, gas, uranium, clay, rock, sand and gravel in, on, under and that may be produced from the Land, together with all rights, privileges, and immunities relating thereto, whether or not appearing in the Public Records or listed in Schedule B. The Company makes no representation as to the present ownership of any such interests. There may be leases, grants, exceptions or reservations of interests that are not listed. Page 4 SCHEDULE B PART II (continued) Special Exceptions: 1. Payment of real estate excise tax, if required, pursuant to the authority of RCW Chapter 82.45, and subsequent amendments thereto. 2. The property described herein is situated within the boundaries of local taxing authority of the City of Renton. As of the effective date herein, the real estate excise tax rate is 1.78%. General taxes and charges: 1st half delinquent May 1, if not paid; 2nd half delinquent November 1, if not paid. Year: Amount billed: Amount paid: Amount unpaid: Tax Account No.: Levy code: Assessed value of land: Assessed value of improvements: Affects: 2016 $2,734.52 $1,367.26 $1,367.26 008700-0285-02 2128 $201,000.00 $0.00 Parcel A 3. Delinquent general taxes and charges: 4. 5. 6. Year: 2016 Amount billed: $3,572.94 Amount paid: $0.00 Amount unpaid: $3,572.94, plus interest and penalties Tax Account No.: 008700-0293-02 Levy code: Assessed value of land: Assessed value of improvements: Affects: 2128 $132,000.00 $131,000.00 Parcel B Notice of tap or connection charges which have been or will be due in connection with development or re-development of the land as disclosed by recorded instrument. Inquiries regarding the specific amount of the charges should be made to the city/county/agency. City/County/Agency: Recorded: Recording No.: Affects: Soos Creek Water and Sewer District January 20, 1989 8901200563 Portion of Parcel A Matters relating to the questions of survey, rights of parties in possession, and unrecorded lien rights for labor and material, if any, the disposition of which will be furnished by supplemental report. The policy requested in the application for insurance is ALTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance for a One-to-Four Family Residence. Said policy is not available for this property because it is vacant land. The ALTA Owner's Policy as identified in Schedule A hereof will be issued. Page 5 7. To help you avoid delays at closing, we would like to make you aware of our final recording run times: Regular recordings: King County: 2:30 pm KING COUNTY recordings are processed out of our Seattle office at 1501 4th Avenue, Suite 300. SNOHOMISH COUNTY recordings are processed out of our Everett office at 2722 Colby Avenue, Suite 125. PIERCE COUNTY recordings are processed out of our University Place office at 3560 Bridgeport Way W., Suite 2D. E-recordings: King County: Pierce County: Snohomish County: Non-excise only, 3:30 pm 3:45 pm 3:30 pm Monday through Thursday, 2:30 pm Friday NOTE: There is an additional $4.00 charge per document when E-Recording. When E- Recording documents requiring excise clearance (available in Snohomish and Pierce Counties only), checks must be made payable to "Rainier Title". Pierce County also charges an extra $0.50 for excise E-Recordings. There is a $1.00 return mailing fee for King County and Snohomish County documents and a $2.00 return mailing fee for Pierce County Documents. Snohomish County E-Recordings are processed out of our Everett office at 2722 Colby Avenue, Suite 125. Pierce and King County E-Recordings are processed out of our University Place office at 3560 Bridgeport Way W., Suite 2D. 8. The legal description in this commitment is based upon information provided with the application for title insurance and the public records as defined in the policy to issue. The parties to the forthcoming transaction must notify the title insurance company, prior to closing, if the description does not conform to their expectations. 9. Deed of Trust and the terms and conditions thereof: Grantor: Margery I. Subic, a married woman, as her separate estate Trustee: First Financial Diversified Corporation Beneficiary: First Savings Bank Northwest Original amount: $500,000.00 Dated: May 28, 2014 Recorded: June 4, 2014 Recording No.: 20140604000277 Affects: Parcel B 10. Assignment of Rents and the terms and conditions thereof: Assignor: Margery I. Subic, who acquired title as Margery Subic, a married woman, as her separate estate Assignee: First Savings Bank Northwest Dated: May 28, 2014 Recorded: June 4, 2014 Recording No.: 20140604000278 Affects: Parcel B Page6 11. We find no pertinent matters of record against the name(s) of the vested owners. 12. We find no conveyances within the last 36 months. NOTE: The Recording No. of the Deed under which title is held is: 7906060936 (Parcel A) and 8505140676 (Parcel B). 13. The land described in this commitment appears to be residential in nature and may be subject to the provisions of RCW 6.13.060 (Homestead Statute), if the land is occupied as a primary residence. If the land is occupied as a primary residence, all instruments conveying or encumbering the land must be executed by each spouse, individually, or by an attorney-in-fact. In the event the Company receives instruments that are not joined by the non-owning spouse with possible homestead rights, the Company may be unable to record or to insure the transaction. 14. Title will be vested in parties yet to be disclosed. When title is vested, their title will be subject to matters of record against their names. 15. All covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations, easements or other servitudes, if any, but omitting restrictions, if any, based upon race, color, creed or national origin, disclosed by the recorded plat of Aker's Farms No. 5. 16. All covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations, easements or other servitudes, if any, but omitting restrictions, if any, based upon race, color, creed or national origin, disclosed by instrument recorded May 5, 1944 under recording no. 3385245. 17. Easement and the terms and conditions thereof: Grantee: King County Water District No. 58 Purpose: Water mains Area affected: a portion of said premises Recorded: August 13, 1980 Recording No.: 8008130467 18. Matters set forth by survey: Recorded: December 12, 2014 Recording No.: 20141212900008 End of Schedule B Part II Page 7 Additional Notes: A. Abbreviated Legal Description: Lot 14 & S 1/2 of Lot 15, Blk 4, Akers Farm No. 5 B. Property Address: 17033 108th Avenue S.E., Renton, WA 98055 C. Investigation should be made to determine if there are any service, installation, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, telephone, gas, electricity or garbage and refuse collection. D. In the event this transaction fails to close, a cancellation fee will be charged for services rendered in accordance with our rate schedule. E. Unless otherwise requested, the forms of policy to be issued in connection with this commitment will be ALTA 2006 policies, or in the case of standard lender's coverage, the CLTA Standard Coverage Policy -2006. The Owner's policy will automatically include the Additional Coverage Endorsement, when applicable, at no additional charge. The Policy committed for or requested may be examined by inquiry at the office which issued the commitment. A specimen copy of the policy form(s) referred to in this commitment will be furnished promptly upon request. F. In the event that the commitment jacket is not attached hereto, all of the terms, conditions and provisions contained in said jacket are incorporated herein. The commitment jacket is available for inspection at any company office. G. The policy(s) of insurance may contain a clause permitting arbitration of claims at the request of either the insured or the company. Upon request, the company will provide a copy of this clause and the accompanying arbitration rules prior to the closing of the transaction. Page 8 STG Privacy Notice 2 (Rev 01/26/09) Independent Agencies and Unaffiliated Escrow Agents WHAT DO/DOES THE RAINIER TITLE LLC AND STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY DO WITH YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION? Federal and applicable state law and regulations give consumers the right to limit some but not all sharing. Federal and applicable state law regulations also require us to tell you how we collect, share, and protect your personal information. Please read this notice carefully to understand how we use your personal information. This privacy notice is distributed on behalf of Rainier Title LLC and Stewart title Guaranty Company and its affiliates (the Stewart Title Companies), pursuant to Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA). The types of personal information we collect and share depend on the product or service that you have sought through us. This information can include social security numbers and driver's license number. All financial companies, such as Rainier Title LLC and Stewart Title Guaranty Company, need to share customers' personal information to run their everyday business-to process transactions and maintain customer accounts. In the section below, we list the reasons that we can share customers' personal information; the reasons that we choose to share; and whether vou can limit this sharina. . ' '. -~,:~lluflJ(!,~ ~,'&(if,'.J'i)§~~fflliilm:ml!tilil ·- For our everyday business purposes-to process your transactions and maintain your account. This may include running the business and managing customer accounts, such as processing transactions, mailing, Yes No and auditing services, and responding to court orders and legal investigations. For our marketing purposes-to offer our products and services to you. Yes No For joint marketing with other financial companies No We don't share For our affiliates' everyday business purposes-information about your transactions and experiences. Affiliates are companies related by Yes No common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies. For our affiliates' everyday business purposes-information about No We don't share your creditworthiness. For our affiliates to market to you Yes No For nonaffiliates to market to you. Nonaffiliates are companies not related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and No We don't share nonfinancial companies. Page 9 We may disclose your personal information to our affiliates or to nonaffiliates as permitted by law. If you request a transaction with a nonaffiliate, such as a third party insurance company, we will disclose your personal information to that nonaffiliate. We do not control their subsequent use of information, and suggest you refer to their privacy notices. -------------------------------~-----------s.~ h•l~l~~I j 1)?-;Xcl~l(-~~ How often do/does Rainier Title LLC We must notify you about our sharing practices when you request a and Stewart Title Guaranty Company transaction. notify me about their practices? How do/does Rainier Title LLC and To protect your personal information from unauthorized access and use, Stewart Title Guaranty Company we use security measures that comply with federal and state law. These protect my personal information? measures include computer, file, and building safeguards. How do/does Rainier Title LLC and We collect your personal information, for example, when you Stewart Title Guaranty Company • request insurance-related services collect my personal information? • provide such information to us We also collect your personal information from others, such as the real estate agent or lender involved in your transaction, credit reporting aaencies, affiliates or other companies. What sharing can I limit? Although federal and state law give you the right to limit sharing (e.g., opt out) in certain instances, we do not share your personal information in those instances. If you have any questions about this privacy notice, please contact us at: Stewart Title Guaran Com an , 1980 Post Oak Blvd., Privac Officer, Houston, Texas 77056 Page 10 Title 100% Locally Owned and Operated Order No. 700161 RT 4218') Sf u;.·u'.:. 4?.180 SF {ll/0 0 ,0 0 ': 0 C ~ :,: ~ "' ~ "' o' m ts ~· zoo 00 SF /fl 0 2' o;::9f:' ~ z m' -I " " ~ 24180 sr~· ()/1):~ J: . ' w I lee 1Anoo SF~ uj, (1/~Fi "i uii i-,;: t,j ;:.! 0 "''· M J: I 210 90 sf'. H CO' c1:·sl t C o! . .., ; _, 0 21090 SF,; "·+! m:----r'.:.o:..o "iio--T-;;---f--------~£...-----~o~:(.:si3:__"J L30 SO 300 42180 SI 0 0275 C 90 ~~ 780 0 Sl· (l~f-~ I SE. 172Ni:>_~l.-·-T_.---·- 560 .OB 14 44671 Sf --· ___ --· _66J.~3__§ __ ------- t N ~ V ,, ~ :::, This sketch is provided without charge, for your information. It is not intended to show all matters related to the property including, but not limited to: area, dimensions, easements, encroachments or location of boundaries. It is not a part of, nor does it modify, the commitment/policy to which it is attached_ The Company assumes NO LIABILITY for any matter related to this sketch. Reference should be made to an accurate survey for further information. Page 11 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued By inierTitle Stewart Title Guaranty Company stewart Vetted and verified. Form 1004-2510 (Rev. 0612006) ORIGINAL Page 12 Stewart Title Guaranty Company, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration, commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Requirements: all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A by the Company. All liability and obligation under this Commitment shall cease and terminate six months after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue the policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. The Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon request. This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by a validating officer or authorized signatory. Stewart Title Guaranty Company NOTE: THE POLICY COMMITTED FOR MAY BE EXAMINED BY INQUIRY AT THE OFFICE OF RAINIER TITLE AND A SPECIMEN COPY OF THE POLICY FORM (OR FORMS) REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT WILL BE FURNISHED PROMPTLY UPON REQUEST. RAINIER TITLE IS AN ISSUING AGENT FOR Stewart Title Guaranty Company COMMITMENT CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. The temn mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquired actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other manner, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred In reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B: or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment In no event . shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. This Commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. 5. The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. Alf Arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at http://www.alta.org. Page 13 SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The matters listed below each policy form are expressly excluded from the coverage of that policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses whlch arise by reason thereof. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (6117/06) 1. {a) Any law, ordinance, permit. or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibition, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1 (a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1 (b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing ta the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c} resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11, 13. or 14); or (d} resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing-business laws of the state where the Land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the lien of the Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth-in-lending law. 6. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 13(b) of this policy. 7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the Insured Mortgage in the Public Records. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11 (b). AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY (6117106) 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1 (a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims. or other matters Page 14 (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 and 1 O; or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar credilors' rights laws. that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is (b) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (c) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy. 5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE FORA ONE-TO-FOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE (02/03/10) In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power, and !he existence or violation of those portions of any law or government regulation concerning: a. building; b. zoning; c. land use; d. improvements on the Land; e. land division; and f. environmental protection. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk a.a., 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23 or 27. 2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14or15. 3. The right to take the Land by condemning it. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 17. 4. Risks: a. that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they are recorded in the Public Records; b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless they are recorded in the Public Records at the Policy Date; c. that result in no loss to You; or d. that first occur after the Policy Date -this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.e., 25, 26, 27 or 28. 5. Failure to pay value for Your Title. 6. Lack of a right a. to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and b. in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or21 7. The transfer of the Title to You is invalid as a preferential transfer or as a fraudulent transfer or conveyance under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws. SCHEDULE B GENERAL EXCEPTIONS The matters listed below each policy form are expressly excepted from the coverage of that policy and that policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason thereof. SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS APPEARING IN ALTA OWNER'S POLICY-STANDARD COVERAGE AND ALTA LOAN POLICY- STANDARD COVERAGE 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. 2. (i) Unpatented mining claims; (ii) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (iii) water rights, claims or title to water; whether or not the matters described in (i), (ii), & (iii) are shown in the public records; (iv) Indian tribal codes or regulaUons, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. 3. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 4. Easements, claims of easements or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 5. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises and which are not shown by the public records. 6. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 7. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, tap, capacity, construction or reimbursement charges for sewer, water, electricity or other utilities, or for garbage collection and disposal. 8. Any titles or rights asserted by anyone, including but not limited to persons, corporations, governments, or other entities, to tidelands, or lands comprising the shores or bottoms of navigable rivers, lakes, bays, ocean or gulf, or lands beyond the line of the harbor or bulkhead lines as established or changed by the Unites States Government, or riparian rights, if any. SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS APPEARING IN ALTA OWNER'S POLICY -EXTENDED COVERAGE 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. 2. (i) Unpatented mining claims; (ii) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (iii) water rights, claims or title to water; whether or not the matters described in (i), (ii), & (iii) are shown in the public records; (iv) Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. 3. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, tap, capacity, construction or reimbursement charges for sewer, water, electricity or other utilities, or for garbage collection and disposal. 4. Any titles or rights asserted by anyone, including but not limited to persons, corporations, governments, or other entities, to tidelands, or lands comprising the shores or bottoms of navigable rivers, lakes, bays, ocean or gulf, or lands beyond the line of the harbor or bulkhead lines as established or changed by the Unites States Government, or riparian rights, if any. SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS APPEARING IN ALTA LOAN POLICY (6117106) and ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (02/03110) No general exceptions appear in these policy forms. Page 15 ' WHE_NRECORDED RETURN TO: Name: . Renton Special Care Community, LL Address;',··· 2731 77th Ave SE, Ste 203 ~1111111111111 rn~~ 111~ ,~~ 1~1 1 ,~1 · Meicer Island, WA 98040 20160831002256 Escrow Number: 7dd161 RT/ ./ ... .-_t,/· Filed for Record at Request (?:f: Ra(nier Tqle, LLP RAINIER TITLE WD 75.08 PRGE-881 OF 003 88/31/2816 14:49 XING COUNTY, WR E2819508 08/31/2016 14:48 /KING COUNTY, WR ' T.AX 113,058.35 .c_ SEI\-E $733,334.00 ··.f . STATUTORY WA,RRANTY DEE:D. PRGE-001 OF 001 THE GRANTOR(S), George l'JSubic ahd Ff~rJCBS M~~ §~bit, hy,band and wife, for and in consideration of Ten dollars and Zero cen~ ($JO.QC) arjd other ·good:and..valuabl_e consideration in hand paid, conveys, and warrants to Renton SpedafCaie COJTI")Unity, u.t th,ffollowing'de~cribed re,itestate, situated in)hiiC?_unty of King, State of Washington;__ · · · · · · " · · ·. · · See attalhed Exhibit A, which is made a part he~~'f-by--this /efere·nc.~:·'·,,,., ....... ,,, .. / . ,• •. ,. . Subject to: s'e~•.atra~t,ed Exhibit A, which Is made a part h~reot b/this ietefence/ Abbr;viatefi"Legi1: Loi 14, Blk 4, Akers Farm No. 5 T~x Parcel Nufnberfi):.008700c9285-02 bated . a,2;12016 ·' t6CHlo\ tl.i'f"" . RECORDJ;b B'( ~AINIER TITH= • ·: •;. ~~l\tE Q~Wa5hington COUt,FTYQF Ki~g ss. . .{ce __ .rti~ uJt I .. k~_o,i"~; ~;~~ s~tisfact·o. ry-eviqence that George W Sublc and France;Jlltary Sublc ;@ i .. the person(s. )w!i'o •_Pr••_ red~-~lo(~ 1"\e, •_nfs~. erson acknowledged that he/sh~ signed this ·•-.,nstrurn.ent and.'ackl)Owledged ,t .Jo·be h1~r e, free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes n'lenti•;ined.in this ir.!Strul;Tlent/ _/ -:!'. · ,,. , .. , ....... : .. Dated: -~-·l¥(t······';q,/ :., .. :~ff,1;'.:;t······ _::· _;; :: . .-{pa 1;05 (~i) .. . .. ' Exhibit A f~'1ia1 oe·scrlption. The following described real estate, situated in the County of King, .·. Stale o(Washin'gfon: L6t 14·, e'iock,4iAker's Fs1rrn· No .. 5'/'according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 40 of plats; page ';:7, r<!cords gf King poDnty,Was.hington; sU~ject Ti: / : 1. 2. 3. AU\:ovenafi 0 ;s, conditibns, )~strictio~s>r~i<irvations, easements or other servitudes, if any, but omittii\g r~trictioiis, if.ariy/based upon race, color, creed or national origin, disclosed by i~e r(icorded pl~! of Ake(~· Farms No. 5. All covenants, conditiohs, restridions, reservations,'·easemen1s or other servitudes, jf any, but omitting restriclioJ\s, if any, based l:Jjiobrace, CQ!O(, creed Or national origin, disclosed by instrument fecorded,May 5, )944 unlfjir r,kording no. 3385245. Easement and the terms and·~~'~ditibns thereof: .·' .,' > i Grai",\~e: King CouMl.y Water .()istrict J\16. 58 Purpose: Water mains, .... ,./ .· .·· Area affected: a portion of said' pren)isesi· Recorded: August 13, 1980 .. Recording No.: 8008130467 4. i Matters s\et forth by survey: Recorded: December 12, 2014 .. .-Recording No.: 20141212900008 End. of Exhibit A Return,Address: ... • Taci;Go~sis. ··.. . no 1)2"' Ave NE/Suite 301 .Bellevue,WA 98004 ' •' .. . / /" C st1Tvtbl\v·W,\RRANTY DEED .---· .• Dated March_, 2016 Grantor(s): 'Marg~ry-Subi~, in.h,i;lsiile and separate estate Grantee(s): Abbreviated Legal Description: , Th_¢Soufhkal,f'~fL?t 15, Blo9k 4, Aker's Farm No. S ·,,,.. . RfCORDEO·SY · .. _ ' ,RAINIE~ TITLE •. \<, pko~R # ?o[z..qti'(?.'/+ ,.,,,,,.-· .:" .:· ,.--' -....• , •. , •. :. :_a Tax Parcel'N o. 008700-0293-02 RefereJiie Nu:b.ers6f Documents Assigned or Releasid?.'O THE O'RANtOR,-·· Mary Subic, in here sole and separate estat&;,J6r ,ten \fbllars ($10) and other good·and vafl]able ~qpsid.eration in hand paid, conveys and warrants to \l)li Grantee, Renton SpeClaJ Care Cqr11!]1uni\,Y; IJ.,C,.a Washington limited liability company, all right, title and interest in the f<illowing descri~ed Ieal est~te: .. The South.,half~f J:sbf 15,-·Bitj,ck 4, Aker's Farm No. 5, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume40.ofpla~, p~ge 21;recotds ofKtng County, Washington. •' •' .-,•,•. Situate in County of King, Staie •o(\Y~sllirigton. DATED this fil_ day of August, 2016. : Grantor: ' Subic x. -1 - E2819475 08/3112016 14:32 KlNG COUNTY, UA!6 SJI 65 TAX , · SALE $3 6,666.00 PRGE-001 OF 001 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT A~:~l')""'.'MADEAPARTOFj~ ioi,,,W'( Cud .,, Joy . ,. ·.· .. · No ·c in and for the Statil,ofWashmgton Residing at Everett, WA My appointment expires: 12-15-18 STA TE OF WASHINGTON .. COUNTY'DFK!NG ;: . .. ) ) ss ) I ~~rtify.that;I lmow.o{hav~ satisfactory. evid~.nce that Margery Subic is the person who appeared before me, and s~id pefsonjicknowledged that5bes1gned ihis instrument and acknowledged it to be.!ifs free and voluntary at:tfcfr the uses aijd p~rposes m¢n\ibned tmls i~str~.!';'ent. n1,. GIVEN lJNbER MYHA~{Nb OFFj(;!AlSEA!c,thls•,Zo/ day of August, 2016 :: ···"" ./ / /·· .... ;",' /" } ·~ ..:--.. - (Signature) (Print Name) ···.· ... ·~y ,;om~ission exµi~es: • 12::rs;:, l ~ . 2. AL TA Loan Policy (6-17-06) -Extended LOAN POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY c§!S~?a!:! Any notice of claim and any other notice or statement in writing required to be given to the Company under this Policy must be given to the Company at the address shown in Section 17 of the Conditions. COVERED RISKS SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B, AND THE CONDITIONS, STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, a Texas corporation (the "Company") insures as of Date of Policy and, to the extent stated in Covered Risks 11, 13, and 14, after Date of Policy, against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance, sustained or incurred by the Insured by reason of: 1. Title being vested other than as stated in Schedule A 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the Title. This Covered Risk includes but is not limited to insurance against loss from (a) A defect in the Title caused by (i) forgery, fraud, undue influence, duress, incompetency, incapacity, or impersonation; (ii) failure of any person or Entity to have authorized a transfer or conveyance; (iii) a document affecting Title not properly created, executed, witnessed, sealed, acknowledged, notarized, or delivered; (iv) failure to perform those acts necessary to create a document by electronic means authorized by law; (v) a document executed under a falsified, expired, or otherwise invalid power of attorney; (vi) a document not properly filed, recorded, or indexed in the Public Records including failure to perform those acts by electronic means authorized by law; or (vii) a defective judicial or administrative proceeding. (b) The lien of real estate taxes or assessments imposed on the Title by a governmental authority due or payable, but unpaid (c) Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. The term ilencroachment" includes encroachments of existing improvements located on the Land onto adjoining land, and encroachments onto the Land of existing improvements located on adjoining land. 3. Unmarketable Title. 4. No right of access to and from the Land. 5. The violation or enforcement of any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (a) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (b) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (c) the subdivision of land; or (d) environmental protection if a notice, describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records setting forth the violation or intention to enforce, but only to the extent of the violation or enforcement referred to in that notice. Countersigned by: Rainier Title. LLC Company Everett, WA 98201 City, State President I Part 1 of Policy Serial No M-9302-004756740 If you want information about coverage or need assistance to resolve complaints. please call our toll free number 1-BOQ.729-1902. If you make a claim under your policy, you must furnish wntten notice in accordance with Section 3 of the Conditions. Visit our World-Wde Web site at http;//WWW stewart.com File No.: 701299RT AL TA Loan Policy (6-17-06) -Extended Covered Risks -Cont. 6. An enforcement aclion based on the exercise of a governmental police power not covered by Covered Risk 5 if a notice of the enforcement action, describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records, but only to the extent of the enforcement referred to in that notice. 7. The exercise of the rights of eminent domain if a notice of lhe exercise, describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records. 8. Any taking by a governmental body that has occurred and is binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without Knowledge. 9. The invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage upon the Title. This Covered Risk includes but is not limited to insurance against Joss from any of the following impairing the lien of the Insured Mortgage: (a) forgery, fraud, undue influence, duress, incompetency, incapacity, or impersonation; (bl failure of any person or Entity to have authorized a transfer or conveyance; {c} the Insured Mortgage not being properly created, executed, witnessed, sealed, acknowledged, notarized, or delivered; {d) failure to perform those acts necessary to create a document by electronic means authorized by law; (e) a document executed under a falsified, expired, or otherwise invalid power of attorney; (f} a document not properly filed, recorded, or indexed in the Public Records including failure to perform those acts by electronic means authorized by law; or (g) a defective judicial or administrative proceeding. 10. The lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage upon the Title over any other lien or encumbrance. 11. The lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage upon the Title (a) as security for each and every advance of proceeds of the loan secured by the Insured Mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor, or material arising from construction of an improvement or work related to the Land when the improvement or work is either: (i) contracted for or commenced on or before Date of Policy; or (ii) contracted for, commenced, or continued after Date of Policy if the construction is financed, in whole or in part, by proceeds of the loan secured by the Insured Mortgage that the Insured has advanced or is obligated on Date of Policy to advance; and {b) over the lien of any assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at Date of Policy. 12. The invalidity or unenforceability of any assignment of the Insured Mortgage, provided the assignment is shown in Schedule A, or the failure of the assignment shown in Schedule A to vest title to the Insured Mortgage in the named Insured assignee free and clear of all liens. 13. The invalidity, unenforceability, tack of priority, or avoidance of the lien of the Insured Mortgage upon the Tit!e (a) resulting from the avoidance in whole or in part, or from a court order providing an alternative remedy, of any transfer of all or any part of the title to or any interest in the Land occurring prior to the transaction creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage because that prior transfer constituted a fraudulent or preferential transfer under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws; or (b) because the Insured Mortgage constitutes a preferential transfer under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws by reason of the failure of its recording in the Public Records i) to be timely, or ii) to impart notice of its existence to a purchaser for value or to a judgment or lien creditor. 14. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the Title or other matter included in Covered Risks 1 through 13 that has been created or attached or has been filed or recorded in the Public Records subsequent to Date of Policy and prior to the recording of the Insured Mortgage in the Public Records. The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred in defense of any matter insured against by this Policy, but only to the extent provided in the Conditions. Exclusions from Coverage The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; {iii) the subdlvision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1 (a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. {b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1 (b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2 Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing lo the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; Part 1 of Policy Serial No. M-9302-004756740 File No.: 701299RT {d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11, 13, or14); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing-business laws of the state where the Land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the lien of the Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth-in-lending law. 6. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage, is: {a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 13(b) of this policy. 7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the Insured Mortgage in the Public Records. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11 (b). AL TA Loan Policy (6-17-06) -Ex1ended CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITION OF TERMS The following terms when used in this policy mean: (a) "Amount of Insurance": The amount stated in Schedule A, as may be increased or decreased by endorsement to this policy, increased by Section 8(b) or decreased by Section 10 of these Conditions. (b) "Date of Policy": The date designated as "Date of Policy" in Schedule A (c) "Entity": A corporation, partnership, trust, limited liability company, or other similar legal entity. (d) "Indebtedness": The obligation secured by the Insured Mortgage including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law, and if that obligation is the payment of a debt, the Indebtedness is the sum of i) the amount of the principal disbursed as of Date of Policy; ii) the amount of the principal disbursed subsequent to Date of Policy; iii) the construction loan advances made subsequent to Date of Polley for the purpose of financing in whole or in part the construction of an improvement to the Land or related to the Land that the Insured was and continued to be obligated to advance at Date of Policy and at the date of the advance; iv) interest on the loan; v) the prepayment premiums, exit fees, and other similar fees or penalties allowed by law: vi) the expenses of foreclosure and any other costs of enforcement; vii) the amounts advanced to assure compliance with laws or to protect the lien or the priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage before the acquisition of the estate or interest in the Title; viii) the amounts to pay taxes and insurance: and ix) the reasonable amounts expended to prevent deterioration of improvements; but the Indebtedness is reduced by the total of all payments and by any amount forgiven by an Insured. (e) "lnsuredH: The Insured named in Schedule A. (i) The term "Insured" also includes (A) the owner of the Indebtedness and each successor in ownership of the Indebtedness, whether the owner or successor owns the Indebtedness for its own account or as a trustee or other fiduciary, except a successor who is an obliger under the provisions of Section 12(c) of these Conditions; (B) the person or Entity who has "contra!" of the "transferable record," if the Indebtedness is evidenced by a "transferable record," as these terms are defined by applicable electronic transactions law; (C) successors to an Insured by dissolution, merger, consolidation, distribution, or reorganization; (D) successors to an Insured by its conversion to another kind of Entity; (E) a grantee of an Insured under a deed delivered without payment of actual valuable consideration conveying the Title (1) if the stock, shares, memberships, or other equity interests of the grantee are who!ly- owned by the named Insured, (2) if the grantee wholly owns the named Insured, or (3) if the grantee is wholly-owned by an affiliated Entlty of the named Insured, provided the affiliated Entity and the named Insured are both wholly-owned by the same person or Entity; (F) any government agency or instrumentality that is an insurer or guarantor under an insurance contract or M-9302-004 756740 Part 1 of Policy Serial No. File No.: 701299RT guaranty insuring or guaranteeing the Indebtedness secured by the Insured Mortgage, or any part of it, whether named as an Insured or not; (ii) With regard to (A), (B), (C), (D) , and (E) reserving, however, all rights and defenses as to any successor that the Company would have had against any predecessor Insured, unless the successor acquired the Indebtedness as a purchaser for value without Knowledge of the asserted defect, lien, encumbrance, or other matter insured against by this policy. (f) "Insured Claimant": An Insured claiming loss or damage. (g) "Insured Mortgage": The Mortgage described in paragraph 4 of Schedule A (h) "Knowledge" or "Known": Actual knowledge, not constructive knowledge or notice that may be imputed to an Insured by reason of the Public Records or any other records that impart constructive notice of matters affecting the Title. (i) "Land": The land described in Schedule A, and affixed improvements that by Jaw constitute real property. The term "Land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is insured by this policy. U) "Mortgage": Mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law. (k) "Public Records": Records established under state statutes at Date of Policy for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge. With respect to Covered Risk 5(d), "Public Records" shall also include environmenta! protection liens filed in the records of the clerk of the United States District Court for the district where the Land is located. (I) "Title": The estate or interest described in Schedule A (m) "Unmarketable Title": Title affected by an alleged or apparent matter that would permit a prospective purchaser or lessee of the Title or lender on the Title or a prospective purchaser of the Insured Mortgage to be released from the obligation to purchase, !ease, or lend if there is a contractual condition requiring the delivery of marketable title. 2. CONTINUATION OF INSURANCE The coverage of this policy shall continue in force as of Date of Polley in favor of an Insured after acquisition of the Title by an Insured or after conveyance by an Insured, but only so long as the Insured retains an estate or interest in the Land, or holds an obligation secured by a purchase money Mortgage given by a purchaser from the Insured, or only so long as the Insured shall have liability by reason of warranties in any transfer or conveyance of the Title. This policy shall not continue in force in favor of any purchaser from the Insured of either (i) an estate or interest in the Land, or (ii) an obligation secured by a purchase money Mortgage given to the Insured. 3. NOTICE OF CL.AIM TO BE GIVEN BY INSURED CLAIMANT The Insured shall notify the Company promptly in writing (i) in case of any litigation as set forth in Section 5(a) of these Conditions, (ii) in case Knowledge shall come to an Insured of any ciaim of title or interest that is adverse to the Title or the lien of the Insured Mortgage, as insured, and that might cause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this policy, or (lii) if the Title or the lien of the Insured Mortgage, as insured, is rejected as Unmarketable Title. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Insured Claimant to provide prompt notice, the Company's liability to the Insured Claimant under the policy sha!I be reduced to the extent of the prejudice. ALTA Loan Policy (6-17-06) -Extended CONDITIONS -Continued 4. PROOF OF LOSS In the event the Company is unable to determine the amount of loss or damage, the Company may, at its option, require as a condition of payment that the Insured Claimant furnish a signed proof of loss. The proof of loss must describe the defect, lien, encumbrance, or other matter insured against by this policy that constitutes the basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. 6. DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION OF ACTIONS {a) Upon written request by the Insured, and subject to the options contained in Section 7 of these Conditions, the Company, at its own cost and without unreasonable delay, shall provide for the defense of an Insured in litigation in which any third party asserts a claim covered by this policy adverse to the Insured. This obligation is limited to only those stated causes of action alleging matters insured against by this policy. The Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the right of the Insured lo object for reasonable cause) to represent the Insured as to those stated causes of action. It shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel. The Company will not pay any fees, costs, or expenses incurred by the Insured in the defense of those causes of action that allege matters not insured against by this policy. (b) The Company shall have the right, in addition to the options contained in Section 7 of these Conditions, at its own cost, to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding or to do any other act that in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the Title or the lien of the Insured Mortgage, as insured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Insured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this policy, whether or not it shall be liable lo the Insured. The exercise of these rights shall not be an admission of liability or waiver of any provision of this policy. If the Company exercises its rights under this subsection, it must do so diligently. {c) \'Vhenever the Company brings an action or asserts a defense as required or permitted by this policy, the Company may pursue the litigation to a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and it expressly reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to appeal any adverse judgment or order. 6. DUTY OF INSURED CLAIMANT TO COOPERATE (a) ln all cases where this po!icy permits or requires the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding and any appeals, the Insured shall secure to the Company the rig ht to so prosecute or provide defense in the action or proceeding, including the right to use, at its option, the name of the Insured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, the Insured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid (i) in securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or defending the action or proceeding, or effecting settlement, and (ii) in any other lawful act that in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the Title, the lien of the Insured Mortgage, or any other matter· as insured. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Insured to furnish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Insured under the policy shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation, with regard to the matter or matters requiring such cooperation. (b) The Company may reasonably require the Insured Claimant to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and to produce for examination, inspection, and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by the authorized representative of the Company, all records, in whatever medium maintained, including books, ledgers, checks, memoranda, correspondence, reports, e-mails, disks, tapes, and videos whether bearing a date before or after Date of Policy, that reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the Insured Claimant shall grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to examine, inspect, and copy all of these records in the custody or control of a third party that reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. All information designated as confidential by the Insured Claimant provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the Insured Claimant to submit for examination under oath, produce any reasonably requested infonnation, or grant pennission to secure reasonably necessary information from third parties as required in this subsection, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this policy as to that claim. 7. OPTIONS TO PAY OR OTHERWISE SETTLE CLAIMS; TERMINATION OF LIABILITY In case of a claim under this policy, the Company shall have the following additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Insurance or to Purchase the Indebtedness. (i) To pay or tender payment of the Amount of Insurance under this policy together with any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred by the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment or tender of payment and that the Company is obligated to pay; or (ii) To purchase the Indebtedness for the amount of the Indebtedness on the date of purchase, together with any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred by the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company up to the time of purchase and that the Company is obligated to pay. When the Company purchases the Indebtedness, the Insured shall transfer, assign, and convey to the Company the Indebtedness and the Insured Mortgage, together with any collateral security. Upon the exercise by the Company of either of the options provided for in subsections (a)(i) or (ii), all liability and obligations of the Company to the Insured under this policy, other than to make the payment required in those subsections, shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation. {b) To Pay or otherwise Settle With Parties other Than the Insured or With the Insured Claimant. (i) to pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of an Insured Claimant any claim insured against under this policy. In addition, the Company will pay any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred by the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and that the Company is obligated to pay; or (ii) to pay or otherwise settle with the Insured Claimant the loss or damage provided for under this policy, together with any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred by the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and that the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of either of the options provided for in subsections (b)(i) or (ii), the Company's obligations to the Insured under this policy for the claimed loss or damage, other than the payments required to be made, shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation. CONDITIONS -Continued 8_ DETERMINATION AND EXTENT OF LIABILITY I Part 1 of Policy Serial No. M-9302-004756740 File No.: 701299RT ALTA Loan Policy (6-17-06) -Extended This policy is a contract of indemnity against actual monetary Joss or damage sustained or incurred by the Insured Claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of matters insured against by this policy. (a) The extent of liability of the Company for loss or damage under this policy shall not exceed the least of (i) the Amount of Insurance, (ii) the Indebtedness, (iii) the difference between the value of the Title as insured and the value of the Title subject to the risk insured against by this policy, or (iv) if a government agency or instrumentality is the Insured Claimant, the amount it paid in the acquisition of the Title or the Insured Mortgage in satisfaction of its insurance contract or guaranty. (b) If the Company pursues its rights under Section 5 of these Conditions and is unsuccessful in establishing the Title or the lien of the Insured Mortgage, as insured, (i) the Amount of Insurance shall be increased by 10%, and (ii) the Insured Claimant shall have the right to have the loss or damage determined either as of the date the claim was made by the Insured Claimant or as of the date it is settled and paid. (c) In the event the Insured has acquired the Title in the manner described in Section 2 of these Conditions or has conveyed the Title, then the extent of liability of the Company shall continue as set forth in Section B(a) of these Conditions. (d) In addition to the extent of liability under (a), (b), and (c), the Company will also pay those costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred in accordance wlth Sections 5 and 7 of these Conditions. 9. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY (a) If the Company establishes the Title, or removes the alleged defect, lien, or encumbrance, or cures the lack of a right of access to or from the Land, or cures the claim of Unmarketable Title, or establishes the lien of the Insured Mortgage, all as insured, in a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals, it sha!J have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused to the Insured. (b) In the event of any litigation, including litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals, adverse lo the Title or to the lien of the Insured Mortgage, as insured. (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to the Insured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Insured in settling any claim or suit wlthout the prior written consent of the Company. 10. REDUCTION OF INSURANCE; REDUCTION OR TERMINATION OF LIABILITY (a) All payments under this policy, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees. and expenses, shall reduce the Amount of Insurance by the amount of the payment. However, any payments made prior to the acquisition of Title as provided in Section 2 of these Conditions shall not reduce the Amount of Insurance afforded under this po!icy except to the extent that the payments reduce the Indebtedness. (b) The voluntary satisfaction or release of the Insured Mortgage shall terminate all liability of the Company except as provided in Section 2 of these Conditions. 11. PAYMENT OF LOSS When liability and the extent of loss or damage have been definitely fixed in accordance with !hese Conditions, the payment shall be made within 30 days. 12. RIGHTS OF RECOVERY UPON PAYMENT OR SETTLEMENT (a) The Company's Right to Recover. VVhenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this policy, it shall be subrogated and entitled to the rights of the Insured Claimant in the Title or Insured Mortgage and all other rights and remedies in respect to the claim that the Insured Claimant has against any person or property, to the extent of the amount of any loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses paid by the Company. If requested by the Company, the Insured Claimant shall execute documents to evidence the transfer to the Company of these rights and remedies. The Insured Claimant shall permit the Company to sue, compromise, or settle in the name of the Insured Claimant and to use the name of the Insured Claimant in any transaction or litigation involving these rights and remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Insured Claimant, the Company shall defer the exercise of its right to recover until after the Insured Claimant shall have recovered its loss. (b) The lnsured's Rights and Limitations. (i) The owner of the Indebtedness may release or substitute the personal liability of any debtor or guarantor, extend or otherwise modify the terms of payment, release a portion of the Title from the lien of the Insured Mortgage, or release any collateral security for the Indebtedness, if it does not affect the enforceability or priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage. (ii) If the Insured exercises a right provided in (b)(i), but has Knowledge of any claim adverse to the Title or the lien of the Insured Mortgage insured against by this policy, the Company shall be required to pay only that part of any losses insured against by this policy that shall exceed the amount, if any, lost to the Company by reason of the impairment by the Insured Claimant of the Company's right of subrogation. (c) The Company's Rights Against Noninsured Obtigors The Company's right of subrogation includes the lnsured's rights against non-insured obligors including the rights of the Insured to indemnities, guaranties, other policies of insurance, or bonds, notwithstanding any terms or conditions contained in those instruments that address subrogation rights. The Company's right of subrogation shall not be avoided by acquisition of the Insured Mortgage by an obliger (except an obligor described in Section 1 (e)(i)(F) of these Conditions) who acquires the Insured Mortgage as a result of an indemnity, guarantee, other policy of insurance, or bond, and the obliger will not be an Insured under this policy. 13. ARBITRATION Either the Company or the Insured may demand that the claim or controversy shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Land Title Association ("Rules"). Except as provided in the Rules, there shall be no joinder or consolidation with claims or controversies of other persons. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the Insured arising out of or relating to this policy, any service in connection with its issuance or the breach of a policy provision, or to any other controversy or claim arising out of the transaction giving rise to this policy. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is in excess of $2,000,000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the Insured. Arbitration pursuant to this policy and under the Rules shall be binding upon the parties. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court of competent jurisdiction. CONDITIONS -Continued Part 1 of Policy Serial No File No.: 701299RT 14. LIABILITY LIMITED TO THIS POLICY; M-9302-004756740 ALTA Loan Policy (6-17-06) -Extended POLICY ENTIRE CONTRACT. (a) This policy together with all endorsements, if any, attached to it by the Company is the entire policy and contract between the Insured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of this policy, this policy shall be construed as a whole. {b) Any daim of loss or damage that arises out of the status of the Title or lien of the Insured Mortgage or by any action asserting such claim shall be restricted to this policy. (c) Any amendment of or endorsement to this policy must be in writing and authenticated by an authorized person, or expressly incorporated by Schedule A of this policy. (d) Each endorsement to this policy issued at any time is made a part of this policy and is subject lo all of its terms and provisions. Except as the endorsement expressly states, it does not (i) modify any of the terms and provisions of the policy, (ii) modify any prior endorsement, (iii) extend the Date of Policy, or (iv) increase the Amount of Insurance. 15. SEVERABILITY. In the event any provision of this policy, in whole or in part, is held invalid or unenforceable under applicable law, the policy shall be deemed not to include that provision or such part held to be invalid, but all other provisions shall remain in full force and effect. I Part 1 or Policy Serial No. M-9302-004756740 File No.: 701299RT 16. CHOICE OF LAW; FORUM. (a) Choice of Law: The Insured acknowledges the Company has underwritten the risks covered by this policy and determined the premium charged therefor in reliance upon the law affecting interests in real property and applicable to the interpretation, rights, remedies, or enforcement of policies of title insurance of the jurisdiction where the Land is located. Therefore, the court or an arbitrator shall apply the law of the jurisdiction where the Land is located to determine the validity of claims against the Title or the lien of the Insured Mortgage that are adverse to the Insured and to interpret and enforce the terms of this policy. In neither case shall the court or arbitrator apply its conflicts of law principles to determine the applicable law. (b} Choice of Forum: Any litigation or other proceeding brought by the Insured against the Company must be filed only in a state or federal court within the United States of America or its territories having appropriate jurisdiction. 17. NOTICES, WHERE SENT. Any notice of claim and any other notice or statement in writing required to be given to the Company under this policy must be given to the Company at Claims Department at P.O. Box 2029, Houston, TX 77252-2029. ALTA Loan Policy(6-17-0 SCHEDULE A File No.: 701299RT *Address Reference: 17033 108th Avenue S.E., Renton, WA 98055 Amount of Insurance: $366,666.00 Date of Policy: August 31, 2016 at 5:00 P.M. 1. Name of Insured: Policy No.: M-9302-004756740 Premium: $643.00 Margery Subic, in sole and separate estate, its successors and/or assigns, as their interest may appear 2. The estate or interest in the land that is encumbered by the Insured Mortgage is: FEE SIMPLE 3. Title is vested in: Renton Special Care Community, LLC 4. The insured Mortgage and its assignments, if any, are described as follows: Deed of Trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, and any other obligations secured thereby: Grantor: Trustee: Beneficiary: Amount: Dated: Recorded: Recording No.: Renton Special Care Community, LLC Rainier Title Company Margery Subic, in sole and separate estate $366,666.00 August 29, 2016 August 31, 2016 20160831002126 5. The Land referred to in this policy is described as follows: See attached Schedule A, Page 2: "Exhibit A-Legal Description" 6. This policy incorporates by reference those ALTA endorsements selected below: ]-ALTA4.1-06-Condominium [ ]-ALTA 5-06-Planned Unit Development [ ] -ALTA 6-06 -Variable Rate Mortgage I ] -ALTA 6.2-06-Variable Rate Mortgage, Negative Amortization [ ] -ALTA 7-06 -Manufactured Housing Unit [X] -ALTA 8.1-06 -Environmental Protection Lien. Paragraph B refers to the following state statute: R.C.W. 70.121.140 [X] ALTA 9.3-06 -Restrictions, Encroachments, Minerals Endorsement ( ] ALT A 13.1-06 -Leasehold Loan [ ] AL TA 14-06 -Future Advance-Priority [ ] ALTA 14.1-06 Future Advance-Knowledge w/MML I ] ALTA 14.3-06 Future Advance-Reverse Mtg w/MML [XJ -ALTA 22-06 -Improvement & Location. The type of improvement is a Single Family Residence, and the street address is shown above. *For Company reference only, not an insuring provision. File No.: 701299RT ALTA Loan Policy (6-17-06) SCHEDULE A (continued) Exhibit A -Legal Description The South half of Lot 15, Block 4, Aker's Farm No. 5, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 40 of plats, page 27, records of King County, Washington; Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. File No.: 701299RT ALTA Loan Policy (6-17-06) File No.: 701299RT EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE SCHEDULE B PARTI Policy No: M-9302-004756740 This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) that arise by reason of: 1. Minerals of whatsoever kind, subsurface and surface substances, including but not limited to coal, lignite, oil, gas, uranium, clay, rock, sand and gravel in, on, under and that may be produced from the Land, together with all rights, privileges, and immunities relating thereto, whether or not appearing in the Public Records or listed in Schedule B. The Company makes no representation as to the present ownership of any such interests. There may be leases, grants, exceptions or reservations of interests that are not listed. 2. All covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations, easements or other servitudes, if any, but omitting restrictions, if any, based upon race, color, creed or national origin, disclosed by the recorded plat of Aker's Farms No. 5. 3. All covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations, easements or other servitudes, if any, but omitting restrictions, if any, based upon race, color, creed or national origin, disclosed by instrument recorded May 5, 1944 under recording no. 3385245. 4. Easement and the terms and conditions thereof: 5. 6. Grantee: King County Water District No. 58 Purpose: Water mains Area affected: a portion of said premises Recorded: August 13, 1980 Recording No.: 8008130467 Matters set forth by survey: Recorded: Recording No.: December 12, 2014 20141212900008 General taxes and charges: 1st half delinquent May 1, if not paid; 2nd half delinquent November 1, if not paid. Year: Amount billed: Amount paid: Amount unpaid: Tax Account No.: Levy code: Assessed value of land: Assessed value of improvements: 2016 $3,572.94 $1,786.47 $1,786.47 008700-0293-02 2128 $132,000.00 $131,000.00 File No.: 701299RT ALTA Loan Policy (6-17-06) File No.: 701299RT SCHEDULE B PART II Policy No: M-9302-004756740 In addition to the matters set forth in Part I of this Schedule, the Title is subject to the following matters, and the Company insures against loss or damage sustained in the event that they are not subordinate to the lien of the Insured Mortgage: NIA File No.: 701299RT Renton Special Care C ,unity 17033 1081h Avenue SE Renton, WA 98157 Site Plan & Conditional Use Submittal Materials 16. Neighborhood Detail Map ) rz (Ofit'J \\)<11" 16-1J · ff'<IIKO.l~&lf'II, i I II I 1---- I I a I ., I I • .. • - ' Renton Special Care C iunity 17033 1081" Avenue SE Renton, WA 98157 Site Plan & Conditional Use Submittal Materials JAN 1 S 2017 CIJY C,f FHH•)hi H /\JH~!:\JC~ 1:;:·vl":IU\} 10. Draft Legal Documents • Street Dedications • Boundary Line Adjustment • Restrictive Covenants , EXHIBIT A COMBINED LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 14, Block 4, Aker's Farm No. 5, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 40 of Plats, page 27, records of King County, Washington. Together with: The South half of Lot 15, Block 4, Ake(s Farm No. 5, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 40 of Plats, page 27, records of King County, Washington. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. • EXHIBIT A RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION 108TH AVE SE A portion of the following described parcel: Lot 14, Block 4, Aker's Farm No. 5, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 40 of Plats, page 27, records of King County, Washington. Together with: The South half of Lot 15, Block 4, Aker's Farm No. 5, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 40 of Plats, page 27, records of King County, Washington. More particularly described as follows: The east 15.50 feet. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. EXHIBIT A RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION SE 172ND STREET A portion of the following described parcel: Lot 14, Block 4, Aker's Farm No. 5, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 40 of Plats, page 27, records of King County, Washington. Together with: The South half of Lot 15, Block 4, Aker's Farm No. 5, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 40 of Plats, page 27, records of King County, Washington. More particularly described as follows: The south 4.50 feet. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. 17. (t'l-/10 • Renton Special Care I nunity , 17033 10gtn Avenue SE Renton, .. A 98157 Site Plan & Conditional Use Submittal Materials , < -. , ·, I~''.:: 11. Construction Mitigation , MAGNET design+dev 153115th Avenue W, S Seattle, WA 98119 ment '211 Renton Special Care Community 17033 1081h Avenue SE Renton WA 98157 Construction Mitigation Description {5 Copies] 12/15/16 • Proposed construction dated (begin and end dates: anticipated start of construction Mid-June 2017 with a construction duration of 12 months to complete work and open for operation by June 2018. • Hours and days of operation: Monday-Friday 7:30 AM-7:30 P, with occasional Saturdays worked during the summer months starting at 8:00 AM -5:00 PM • Proposed hauling/transportation routes: Hauling routes will be up Petrovitsky to 1081h to Benson or up 1081h to Benson. • Measures to be implemented to minimize dust, traffic, and transportation impacts, erosion, mud, noise, and other noxious characteristics: Standard construction practices will be implemented; rock construction entrances, storm drain inlet protection as required, silt fences, Rock check dams, construction signage, coordination of off-site work with the city, working during city allowed time frames, etc. • Any special hours proposed for construction or hauling (i.e. weekends, late nights): No • Preliminary traffic control plan: All traffic revisions will be looked at as individual case and will be dealt with as such. We hope to not have to revise traffic or close any traffic lanes for more than the work hours during the day. All traffic control plans will be submitted to the city for prior approval. • Will the project require the use of cranes? No Renton Special Care Community 17033 1081h Avenue SE Renton, WA 98157 Site Plan & Conditional Use Submittal Materials > ' Ji, N 1 :J I 1 : -,. ' ,,_ ,_ ,' --;y 13. Affidavit or Installation of Public Information Sign(s) DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -------Renton E> AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 I www.rentonwa.gov ) ) 55 ) 1/i'' ' () )nl? •· , I 'l J. e( 1:.. ,.) --~t<,_e:-:~--_v_1_1·_,_~t-,_{_._c_.~(_ic-i~"'-~~L----~------------' being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: 1. On the -1+--day of Jk{1,1~r , 20J1::_, I installed information sign(s) on the property located uiNu.Frul,..H""fltl"'u-\_..,,_71~~..._N=-----------for the fol lowing project: Project Name ~{lr,j @AvCAylf {In nu N tty L LC Owner Name public at 2. I have attached a copy of the neighborhood detail map marked with an "X" to indicate the location of the installed sign. 3. This/these public information sign(s) was/were constructed and installed in locations in conformance with the requirements of Chapter 8 Title 4 of Renton Municipal Code and the City's "Public Information Signs I stallation" han t package. s aller Signature SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this~ day o~~--_ • 20lJ:_ . . ,,\\I\IIHH111,, .,,f A A f\ ~ ~l'llNG '1•,11 ~ _I, ~ L1 _ _ · __ , ':<'"<'~~-".-,-..~.., \, NOTARY P~BUC in and for the State of Washington, ;:f f -•Y O ~ residing at_(\ tJ l\JC(Y1 I v\/)4 -:; ,.,.-.... ,:;. 1--i o .'u" c,~ r/l~ :&, ~-iz, \ -.. •""' ::--I l ~ \0., ~11 ~",! ~ '! My commission expires on Qi 3\ Zu\ T ,,, Q\' ,,"' .;:;! cc lt111l\\\\\\\'-'-'''' .Ji.~ .;::: '• .. .rr4TE 0~ __ /' 7 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Temp!ates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Pub Info Sign Handout.docx Rev. 04/2016 CONTACT LIST O'IMJI/APPUCAHT: REMO/I SffCW CARE COJ.llfUNITY. UC ZlJI ll!H Alt" Sf. S/J!Tc ZOJ /JERCER /SWID, WA 980,D COi/TAC[· K£\1N CARL PHONf.· (206) 178-4125 [}JAJL ke'l'inlJrrJ<J9net-dd.com SUR!flOl':- l/JC, INC. 20210 142110 A"fNIJE N[ WIX)()IM1[£[ WASHINGTON 98012 COllrACc-IIICHAE1. J.l[RflffT. P1.S PHONE.-(425) 806-1869 FM:: (•25) '82-2/!$J [NAll: micha~lmOldccorp com AR(HTtCT: fNG/NEEJI.· UX:, INC. ZD21 0 142ND AVfJIVE NE 'lt'OOOIIMU[. WASHIIICTON 98012 COIIT,•C..-- JENSEN FEY ARCHITfC1lJRE Ai/0 PW/INC P.S. ---~ .......... --. Pl/()/,/[. (•25) 806 -1869 F,X. (425) '82-2893 [Wk - 1.AN09':APf AIIOITtCT: [1./,/ ENVIROIIEMS 1925 POST ,'ll£Y. SUIT[ JB SEAm.£ WA 98101 COlliAC r.· GREG J./URPHY PHONE: (208) J9J-826J [MAIL: gmvrpliy(Jefmenv.com PROJECT INFORMATION llJO /D/1Y WM REDJ./OND. WASHINGTON 98052 COi/TAC[· R[1J8EN RIOS PHONE: (425) 216-0J /8 DWL rricsOjens,n/t,y.com GCOTtCH: Pf/OffSSK)l/,'J_ SDMCE /1/WSTFl![S, INC. (PSI) zosoe 561H AV[NIJE ltITT. surrr A l rl/NWOOI). WA 980J6 GEOTECI/ CONrACc-J./ICIW.L 5. PIAC£ P[ PHONE: (425) «J9-25(H FAX: (425) 582-8193 [MAll: mich-::~l.ploceOpsiuso.ccm SITT: IDOfl£SS: 17033 108lli AVE SE, RENTON, WA 98055 T~ PAACaS: 0087000825, 0087000293 GROSS SITE AAfJ.. 65.715 SF (1.51 AC) ROW DEDICAJ10H AAfA: 4,5 65 Sf (0. 10 AC) t£f SfTE AA£A 61,150 SF ( 1.40 AC) El(ISJNJ US£: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIOCNTl'.l P1!lll'OSED US£: C0tNAL£SCHIT CENTER -CONCITIONAL USE CURR0/1 ZONI«>: R-14 CURRDIT COl,f> PIAN: R-14 WATER: SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRK;T SEWER: SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRK;T POWER: PSE G,IS: PSE mmfJNE: CENTUR'I\.INK CABLE: CO U CAST SCHOOL OISTI!ICT: RENTON f403 rG'.JNO Rfa.lR JNO C1P C.'Wnts UES Q..!2' Nf l "W OF PR':}P[RT:' CORN[l~ ~. =,, fRE OISIRICT: RE~~ON RfA MAXIMUM BUILDNG fO;HT: 35· srn!,i,C!(S: FRONT: 15' .COl'ND 1.5" P.'P[ 0.8;· N!i'W CF P.vOP[Ri'( CCCl•i'[R RL1R: 10' 5()[; 4 ' SI)[ (>J1)NG STREI1): 1s· OPEH SPICE REOlJIIDjEI/TS ·--·-,.,._ .oc-. v• -·--·••--,., MINIMUII OPEN SPICE REQURED: 0 Sf If THREE OR FEWER DWEWNG UNITS SET l?fatR AN[., G:IP [M W LS/41551 IMPERVIOUS REQUfflIDITS MAXIMUM MPERV100S: 350 Sf PER UNIT If 4 OR MORE DWEWNG UNITS 80~ 65X MAXIMUM LOT ro.tJ>.ICE: to' IMPEJM:IUS: to' Pf!M)JS; 43.072 Sf (70.40~) I B.078 Sf LOT C(MR,IG[; 17.J06 Sf (28.30~) REFUSE AND RECYCUI«, N1£A R£QUREl) RErn:lE: REQUREO GAAB,1,GE: !P~Ql!IRED: 51 Sf 102 Sf 18(1 Sf .. REllURED• 34 STALLS 25~ REDOC'OOII• 26 STALLS ~ C1JMP/CT SWlS fil(Jl(/,&f; 8 STAf.LS ii N:JA STAU.S REQUIRED: 2 STAf.LS PAAXlltl PRO\'IDED: 26 STALLS J ::j COMP/CT SWlS PR(MDED: 7 ST Af.LS ] ADA STAU..S PROw'IOED: 2 $TAUS .. LEGEND 16 ~ & f00tr1D CA.S£D \IOHUMOO. ~ t+OTrn • f'OIJt(l ~• ~.AS Mlml f 0 SET ii~ M'O C)P S10iU,I DF'J.'H WJ,ll()l.[ ct ··, ~_, 1t m .£?t(lt,( l,W,IIIOl£ WAPU nu ca:,., rm: r::: C[ '-.[$ G.·• '.'J. ;:ir rRc·rETT uic ~. TAX P ARCEL #008700028·) ~ :Jl(I:_ _-b l't:·t ~,;!:. :. !::!..':'C K ''/.~LL .TS 't'i'- .' ,;· ' -0--0-FO,CE F C·F iJf;-,:'PER-u' LI'·!~ ~ :J ~ Cl) a f Q I N l 8 ~DR>14C:A~3A.SlN SA.MITAAT'S£trt'ER),Wff)I,.,£ ~TUIW. CA.S WJ..'t'E Fl!£~ WA1£q \1,1,1,.1/( "'ID llffiR ,;; 0 8J1.URO --P--Ut«:f.:RGROUt()~UNE CJ ~ n--+--{1 )( ROCfUH[ POW(.ll. VW..1 PROPOSC.D POtlr:R: POCI 'fl I LIGHT STitE!T/Prn LICHT COR 117.1 PED LICHT COR 116.1 :Relf c. :c:, (O_(f;tfE H L .. .lJi U:.~ .H' Wm i,;R::i.:~r'l'f rn 1-!:-__ .f ~ = i'o.!i' POI.£ •l l£Hl { ~ POWER POL£ '--~~ 1.2· [. - ,::R;.:+~...,,-, L \Ii: NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 AND SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4, SEC 29, TWN 29, RGE 5 E, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON -·-O I I I l RENTON SPECIAL CARE COMMUNITY • ..,,,_, __ ,._ .. _,_,u __ ._ •--.. ~. -,, SITE PLAN --·-~··-··----· -,.. ---~. -~--..¥ ............ . ' .... , ____ _ ( ... ·' r-; ; . /: • I I /, r I t/ I /f r/1);s:· .,,."; , I /: 1 I / .! (_.!L.LL"--,:_; SCALE; 1" ~"~-:::i-11111:_::JI_II;, 20· 0 ·········:~ ---.~.---:,. [ /! (' h(USt :) : /_//_//// i.f ~·~ ,i:; -t~~r:},,;:; I tli 20' 20· 40' •. Q !·····/. .'/ (~ • ~\ • : : : : • • ' • I N M 1nr w · :(:-. '.,,··· . .1. ... · .. .1. ..... , rrr~.=~~s$f ~~.:_:[~~~~~ _. f f ]~:-:<0:· <j , --;:_:;_. I ; ~1 , ·' ----: t' .. --•. ;-r _,,:T ······.':::-.... f·· .4v, ·-1:-· ......... f ... f .I- r VICINITY MAP SCl,1.£: 1· ;20QQ· I -11' ... :·f:'5:~t' vw · ;' .......... c: .. -i1- 2)° COTTAGEA F1'=4 10.5 2.8g Sf 1~· )~{._ ' COTTAGEC'-, Fl'•410.5 4,!27 SF '._~1,~ '• ' COTTAGE!fi> ff•410.5 ·, 4.827 Sf I I ,. '~ I /. i ' 1s.o· BUii.DiNG SETBACK~ ..: ;.-,, j ~-,, /~..,,, / -x:-'7 r ,:,,/ 1 -:------,_ -1.-----..r -""\_, ~\ ~ --- '-' I Fl fl rl'C·~'"T / <.- \ ,-·' t :. - .! JAN J J :J1/ c:rN 0r t~t,\i iO~ f'LN~N\l'lG l)\\Ji90".I /~ -------~ ~ ~ 1 661.JS{P) _, ______2:.:r---===--:::-::-=--=~ ~s,--7~(M/ ,,.719 94'(RJ) -. __ :::::-::.--=-=--__ --~ ~0 --1 __ ... "'"-...-l,:r. · -·····-· ·· ·-· .... ::C . ······ ,;,· I(>·-,4,,,,_--,. __ ---'--'.'; _____ ,; ---,;gf2J"(f(2) I "· "F.I I l -----CI.L_' -: I I '. SU R[&WANDCAP r--\ 1~1:i ;'.'.' ' ~<,;~,,," ,.,, . 1Ef :ml·r:;• "· ,; ""~::: \'.\:~ / (j:j;::i•, ;~ " ,,., .,~. -. \_ ;::;;;;,,,' .,•c: = W<•• Iii ;; c:: g,~ I~ U i,e~~ ~~ .E.s..!CI) ~~ ~Cl)~ f,1_ w s u I !w f Q i 'ii ~ < ~ -...1 I U -- (.) ~ ...J z ...J ~ ::> ~ ~~ ~ ::E 0) :) 0 ~ ~ 0 <' ~ 0 W 2 (.) a:: c:S <: w < ct: ::s ex: {) W Q ~ ~ V) ~ ...J ~ V) < 0 "'<: (.) w i!:: w a.. 0.. D::l Cl) en a z z ~ 0 I-0 ~ z I-w z ex: w a:: JOB NU~BER: 16-137 OAAWING NAM£: 151)7P-S?-I'\. D£SK:NER: MEY DRNllNG El"J': CM DATE: 1-23-17 SCAL£; >S NOT£0 JURISDICTION: RENTON SP-01 5l£ET 1 Of 1 ;;~: .ii!:i i I ni~~ ~1.n1 h ~: 1 isH~ ;~;:1. .1 ~~ ~ l ! L L(OZ 'Z( ,U:l'e'nN'e'r uone::iuddv Me1.Ae~ ue1d ai1s 'vM 'uqu~;,, 35 snus~v41~0l ~rnn AJ!unwwo~ aJe~ IB!:>ads UOJUa~ I i, • I ~· ;;1 i! ih ~ fl ' l ! ! ! I , ' l l l ' l i l ' I ' l ' " l l l • l ' j l I I j I ., l' ,I l ! l ! l ' I ! I i l J l I f ' j ' !G"i'.t@(,,';;>,({08 ~' s.,., < ', ; .ty ·,_/ $1 5! ! l ll 1 ' g r !I • ~I ! : ' ~ I i I ' l ' ' l ' f } ' ' ! ! l ' i ! I I ! ! j i j i ! ' ' j l l 1 l ' ; l i ! "I . 1 ! 110 C9 o oio ! 000 l i I !I ~ Q.. 0 i )l = I •• N ". • ~ I t :;c ..J ' C •• ] ~ .J ' ~IF '°"! .Ji\~I .,. •·, 10·-o· INTERIOR PARKING LANDSCAPE ,--J -26 PARKING SPACES X 15SF PER SPACE ,. 390 SF OF INTERIOR LANDSCAPING REQUIRED AND PROVIDED -26 PARKING SPACES/6 = 5 TREES REQUIRED AND PROVIDED ~ I ' I ' I ' I ' I J STREET TREES REQUIRED AND PROVIDED ' ' 1 PlANllNG. -1 SHRUB PER 20SF = 20 SHRUBS REQUIRED V/1 .· 10' WIDE PARKING LOT PERIMITTR ~ .... ,2:::~.) -ONE TREE PER JO UN EAL ; · FEET OF STREIT FRONTAGE AND PROVIDED -GROUNDCOVER PROVIDING 90% COVERAGE WITHIN 3 YEARS NO MORE THAN 50' BErWEEN PARKlNG STALLS AND AN INTERlOR LANDSCAPE AREA EXISTING 1 O" CALIPER BIG LEAF Mo\PLE TO REMAIN PROPOSED 7' TAU WOOD FENCE (T(PICAL) ---------...... COTTAGE A ~a~ ----r=----,;c-..__.-- COTTAGE 6. ff=410.5 ""-' - : 1 -ONE SHRUB PER 20 S.F. OF ' LANDSCAPED AREA {MA'I:. 501 DECIDUOUS) -LAWN GROUNDCOVER. g/ I j-~ ,a' WIDE LANDSCAPE ALONG PUBLIC : STREET EXCLUDING AREA OF DRIVES : I AND WALKS. LANDSCAPE PRQl/!DED I;'. ALONG BUILDING FOUNDATIONS DUE TO PROXIMITY TO PUBUC WALK. ' J "'' ~! ;!:, -~1 ' PROPOSED RETAINING WAU -------.__ NIJIE: COOlmAAD TO BE """""°'"'"""" SHIMlS. l'£REJNAlS 00 LAWN '· \ -'· /' I ' I \,:O ·I . ! -el I i ~ ... , 1 EXISTING 8" CAIJPER BIGLEAf EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN IN PLACE ---~ \ \ \ ", 1: __.-j . ,. . I MAPLE TO REMAIN. "'° I,\ , j 10' FULiY SIGHT-OBSCURED LANDSc.APE BARRIER REQUIRED AND PROVIDED BETWEEN MULTI-FAMILY USE {R14) AND LESS INTENSE RESIDENT~ ZONE (R8) COTTAGEC [~o~ COTTAGt°a fT~410.5 '\ """" -/ ! ' I ' I ~/.' ~: ' ----/ :;z-_~ --J:c.-,_ --~"' '" --:,_;,,~ -:, -:--• 7----,~~ µ / -~ -. ~ b --• 25'-0 -,s--o ,o-o ;so ~ ' \ j I " • 0.,.-0 2"'5r-0 40-"d \ :-. . . ~ I : ' ~ I --=':~-__-:_:-c.=------~------= =--.:-=--__;;,_;;:__----~ _-_--c ---~~ ~~~-~ ----~~-:_~~~;7:_·~~cc-~~=-~---~ '_"_ j ~:-=------;;,;~:r ~~~~fS,;: OF_-------STR-~-TR-,-~ :-~o-u,-,,:-ANo PR-o-~-,-ED--~ _ _....,_=e-.,.-,-----DRIVES AND WALKS. LANDSCAPE ' PROVlDED ALONG BUILDINGS DUE TO NOTES: 1. SEE SHEET L2-0 FOR PLANT DETAILS AND SCHEDULE. 2. ALL TREES TO BE A MINIIJUM OF 2· CALIPER AT 54" ABOVE GRADE. 3. STREET TREES TO BE FROM THE CrTY OF RENTON APPROVED TREE UST. 4. INSTALL 6" DEEP TOPSOIL IN ALL PLANT BEDS AND LAWN AREAS, INSTALL 24" DEEP TOPSOIL IN RAISED PLAN'TERS. 5. ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS IN PLANT BEDS TO RECEI\IE A 3" THICK LAYER OF SHREDDED BARK MULCH. 6. HYDROSEED TIJRF GRASS SEED TO CREAlE LAWN IN ALL AREAS NOT OTHERWISE INDICATED AT PAVEMENT OR PLANT BED. PROITCT PLANT BEDS AND PAVEMENT FROM HYDROSEED OVERSPRA.Y. 7. Fili PLANTER POTS WITH 1" LAYER OF DRAINAGE AGGRECATE, FILTER FABRIC AND PLANTING SOIL B. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN PLANTS IN A HEALTHY CONDmON UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE. 9. THE PROPERTY OWNER Will BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ANO LOCATING All. IRRICATION LINES LOCATED IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 10. EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN SHAl.l BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION WITH 4' CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT DRIPLJNE. 1 1. PLANTING DETAILS AND MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATIONS WILL ACCOMPANY FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN. 12. AU PLANT5 Will BE WAlERED BY IRRIGATION. PROXlh.lfTY TO SIDEWALK. N -$ 0 20 40 n..r,___J SCAf.E: 1"-20' 80 Jf 71, COTTAGES ''Renton ~ ca u • ~;:::"" '"'""-·""'~·----__ ..,~ 1975 Pn" Alloay S"H• .1R Seattl.,, WA 981~1 Pnone 2(16 650.8589 www.sjmplar, corr.'soattl8 C: 0 <( ;; >.! <ti 0 --0 Q. ,__ Ct1 ·-~ ·-s:::::: er: Cl. -<( CJ :, UJ 31; m E ~ Cl) Q. a' '> en E ! Cl) c::: C: 0 §l C: <ti OU1il ii: -~ Cl) C: -(1) in 0:: _i/·,j\, No. Oe,,orlp,t~r.-. : Date Issue D;':·=' ====1~/1~212~0\~6 Drawn: Checked: Project No.: 16·561 Landscape Site Plan L 1-0 0 N N >-[l'. <( :, z <( ~ ,th ---------- lJOl 'Z( Al:NnNvr uo1;e::>11dd\f M811\8~ ue1d e11s 'iM 'oOJUB~ 3S enU<l/l'Q' ~lSOL t£0L l ~i,unwwo~ aJe~ 1epads uoiua}:I ~ I ' ; ;i ',\ ,, \r J' I ' . I ' ·. I. I' ' ' I , I , I,; ' I 11\ ' / 1 \' r, 1 1 ·,, ri '--~~r ' i i' II 11 :!. 0 0 •• o-I 0"-.... ,, . •= ..J ! 'B.li ""' HH ...J .<Cuo. ' CENTPJJ.. LEADER. DO NOT CUT. DO NOT PRUNE wrrnoor APPROVAf. FROM LA NOTES: 1. ~G PtAATING PITS DOWN AND OUTWARD SO lHAT WATER Will NOT COillCT [)RfCTlY BElOW ROOTIIAI..L sew< Pl)NTING PIT PRJOR TO F'L'NTlNG SPRAY SOIL OFF or R0011lAIJ. 12 CA. EWUNG WIRE WITH ~ Bi.ACK Rl/Bf.ER HOSE TO _.,. UNCOIL 1WISTill DR ORCUNG ROOTS PRIOR TO PL>MlNG. CUT OFF Am PERW..NENTLY KINKED ROOTS RENM Nff AND >J.1 PI..A.STlC OFF or ROOT8Al..l PRIOR TO PI.J.NTlNG PROTECT BARK. FA5TEN SE:CURELY 8UT LEAVE ROOM FOR Fl.£XING TREE TO BE 2-J" ABM l..E.VEL OF EXfG GRADE J-4' HIGH SOIL $4.UCER. REMCM: PRIOfl TO FlRST WINTER RAINY Sf.ASON FlNISH GRADE ---:\,. REMM >J.1 W!W'PINGS FROM TOP HALJ OF ROO!Bfil BACKflll SOIL FROM Plf EXCAVATION PEDEST,lL OF EXT'G SOIL TAMP THCROUGHLY Willi FOOT ONLY C) TREE PLANTING SCALE: NTS lYP. PLANT SCHEDULE DECIDUOUS TREES 0 a ocB 0 a 0 E\iERGREEfi TR[ES 0 2X2XB' LONG FlR STAKES. PRESERVAM TIDTED WITH WOOCXJFE OR EQ. PRESTAIN llARK BROWN. USE J STAKES FOR TRfES WITH 2-1/2" C.AUPER OR GRfATER TWO TIMES ROOT&J..1. D~ ;:j( _,,.,,. ROUGHEN SIDES OF TREE ffi BOTANICAL NM1E / COMMON NAME Amelanchier alnifolla I Ser.iceOOrry Amelanchierlaevis 'L-Jstre / Lus-re Allegheny Ser,lce:.erry BetLJla LJtilsjacquemr,ntii I Whitabarl<•d Himalayac Bircr, SIZE 15gal "' '" i ~ S- ,,, z " '"° C) UULTI-STEM TREE SCALE NTS C/\1..iHT QTY 2.S'Cai Sl~gle stem 5 2.5"Cal ,s Cornus nuttalil / We stem Flowering Da;iW<lod 65g.al 3.5"Caj " Fraxinus latifolia I Oregon /\sh 15gal 2.5"Cai Quercus ga-ryana I Orogoo Oak 15gal Ouercus robur: Englisr Oak "' 2 s·c,o BOTANICAL W.ME I COMMON NAME '"' C/\1..iHT OT< Cedrus deodara 'fashgata I Deodar Cedar 15gal ,s TWO TIMES R0011lAIJ. D~ PLANTING TYP. SHRUBS ('~,_,_j \_.,-.,! '?l t[.: © (J * (\ '\~~-) G '"°' \J) 12 GA. BAILING WIRE WIDi Bl.ACK RUBBER HOSE TO PROTECT BARK. FASTEN SECURELY BUT LEAVE ROOM FOR FL.fXING 2X2X8' LONG FlR STAKES. PRESOOATh"E TREATED Will, WOOOUFE OR EC. PR£STAiN DARK BROWN. P\Jl:E ON SIDE OF PRfV.AJJNG WIND ~----SET P\ANT 2-J' ,'BOVE FlNISH GPADE ----2· BARK t.lULCH. fEAlHER TO TREE TRUNK flNISH GRADE REMD'YE >J.1 WRAPPINGS FROM TOP HALf OF ROO!Bfil BACKFlll SOIL FROlil PIT EXCAWiTION PEDEST,lL OF EXfG SOIL TAMP THOROUGHLY WITH FOOT ONLY TWO TIMES ROOTBM.l DIA. G SHRUB PLANTING, 1YP. SCALE: NTS BOTANIC/IL NAME I COMMON NAME SIZE OT< Cearothus • Blue SapPhire· I Blue Sapphire Ceanothu• ,~, " Cho;sya le/",ata ! Mexlcan Orari;pe 5gal " Philad,.phus x ,irg,c,ab.s; l,loc;k Orai,ge 5'}'11 s, Philild<ophus x ,irgir.alis 'Dwa~ Snowflal,;e' I JwaifSnowflake Mockorange s~, " Rhodode·dron x ·cucnin;rn!.,fs WCite· / Cunningham's While Rhocodesdron 5gal Rit>es ,,qµ,ineLJm / Red flowonr,g Cu,ranl Sg~I '" Spiraea bclulifoia lucida/ Shiny Leaf Spiroa 5gal ~ Vaccicium ova:um I Evargreen Hucl:Jat>err1 !gal '~ SET Pl.ANT 2-3' "80VE FlNISH GRADE BACKFlll m SOIL FROM PIT EXCAVA110N 2' BARK t.lULC!, 3-4' HIGH SOIL SAUCER. REMM PRIOR TO FIRST WINTER RAINY SEASON REMM ALL WRAPPINGS FROM TOP HALJ OF ROOTBfil ---....___ LIMIT OF BARE ROOT SPROO PEDEST& Of EXT'G SOIL TAMP lHOROUGHLY WITH FOOT ONLY 1X PW/1 SPACING ~~I '~(' $-&i SCVIIFY SIDES OF Pl.ANTING PIT C) GROUNOCOVER PLANTING TYP. SCALE ~ TS HERBACEOUS "ERRENIALS BOTANICAL NAME I COMMON NAME <) HellctotrichM sempcfl'irens ·saphirsprudel' I Sap,.il\! Fountain Blue Oal Grass ~ Herneracallisx 'Joan Sernor' I O,,yiily $-Heuchera americana 'Groen Spice' 1 American AltJrnruol -* Iris tenax/ Oregon Iris ' GROUND COVERS BO-:-~NICAL NAME I COMMON ~AME D Aju,ia rep(Jcs I Car~I Bugle -----SET PLANT AT NEW FINISHG'lADE ~----BARK MUL:H, :!" D£PTH, FLJiTHER TO BASE Of PLANT r--FINISH G~ADE ---CONTROLLEJ RHEASf FERTILIZERGRM/Ul.fi, P .ACE PRIOR TO BARK MULCH APPLICATION --BACKFILL wr~ SOil FROM P:T[XCAVATION Norr 1 SEE TRIANG. SPACING DETAIL FOR LAYOUT EDGE Of PLANTING BED SIZE OT< 1 gal ~ 5gal ,~ s,, " 5gal " SIZE $?ACING QTY "" a•o.c. 2,330 Jtt 'l,{,. COTTAGES ,dRcnton a> I., ca u -ca ·-0 a> C. U) 111 -----~t.·-~o _ .. __ W'lO PoslAlley ~·Jl!e 311 5eat1l•. WA 9B101 PMne 2['J(',.G00.8'>09 www.o1rrp1a, .. com/soaltl0 C: 0 <( >o! .::= "' .!:! .... .B •-C C: &! "ii,-.. Cl. - :::::s LU E i E ! < ;:: Cl) "> Cl) 0::: 0 N " >-Cl'. <( :, C: 0 1g z C: <( "' ~ OU .... C: a> c::: M 8 ,-.. ii: Cl) ... in Jt•,N .'I. J i,11' i' V " No. Description D.i18,. ', f:.n ·. Issue Data: 1112.12016 Drawn: c::======= Check~: Project No.: 16·561 Landscape Details L2-0 Renton Special Care Community 170331081h Avenue SE Renton, WA 98157 Site Plan & Conditional Use Submittal Materials 20. Landscape Analysis, Lot Coverage, and Parking Analysis • environments Planners Architects Landscape Architects Urban Designers Geospatial Analysts Seattle j Jacksonville 1925 Post Alley Suite 38 Seattle, WA 98101 USA t 001-206-650-8589 1035 Kings Avenue Jacksonville, FL 32207 USA t 001.904.296.8066 lnfo@elmenv.com www.elmenv.com @elmenv January 11, 2017 Landscape Analysis PREPARED FOR: Kevin Carl, Magnet D+D PREPARED BY: Greg Murphy, Landscape Architect, SITE ADDRESS: 17033 108 1h Avenue SE, Renton Washington SUMMARY The following is a summary of the landscape proposed for the Renton Special Care Center demonstrating compliance with Renton Municipal Code. Total square footage of the site and the footprints of all buildings: 65,754 s.f. Total square footage of existing impervious surface: 6,992 s.f. Total square footage of proposed impervious surface: 43,072 s.f. Total square footage of each individual building Cottage A= 2,825 s.f. Cottage B = 4,828 s.f. Cottage C = 4,828 s.f. Cottage D = 4.828 s.f. Total = 17,309 s.f. Percentage of lot covered by buildings or structures: 26% Number of parking spaces required by City Code: 26 Number and dimensions of stand a rd, compact, and ADA accessible spaces: Standard= 17 spaces, 9'x20' Compact= 7 spaces, 9'x16' ADA Accessible= 2 spaces, 9'x20' with 9'x20' aisle Square footage of parking lot landscape (perimeter and interior) Required perimeter landscape: 20' measured along R.O.W. x 10' depth Provided perimeter landscape: 20'x12' Required interior landscape: 15sf / parking space= 390 s.f. Provided interior landscape: 535 s.f. L \ I [;::, G) S IT E PL AN l ' ~----CCNDSNSES \ SE 172ND ST '/::,:: ~ \ I w Cf) w ~ I f-- (X) 0 --. "' 0 _ (J '\I \__j SITE PLAN G ENERAL NOTES T HIS SIT E FLAN IS NOT A SURVEY ANO IS FOR REFERENCEOMY ITl!,,PROVIDECF'0=!8UU>ING LAYOU T O NlV Ht: CCNTRACTOR SHALL I/ERA ON-SITE ALL GRADES. EXlSTING IMPSlOVEME NTS. P~o:ie=iTY UN!:S, EASEMENTS SCTSAC<.S IJTLITl[S AND SUB-SJRUi:i URES. w rERE OISCHEPE"tCIES OCCUR, CONTACT TriE C.Pill ENGIN£ER FOR l iAROSCAP[ A.',10 JAAINAGE :>t.Ji,NS SEE C M ~ o\.'.10 lAl'.OSCAPE OAAW'lN~S. FO~ ADCrTIOfio\L tffO;';:MAT K::N & s.cc;,e NOi INCLUDED. iHfER TO CML LANDSCAPE MECHANICA~, ELEC. & PU.IM 51"1C OHAWlN~S FINISH GRACES SH.A.LL FRCVlDE ;>Q.SrTJVE DRAINAGE AWAY n l0'-1 Bl [X, RErt=R TOS::itlS REJ-'Q~T. ALL ROCF DRAINAGE TC-BE ?l?ED TO STR:E-CR APPROPR~TE CFWNAGE ::"ACILITI PRO\/IC[ EXPJli.NSJC,N & CONTOl JOIN TS AT Jli.LL EXTE.RCR CONCRETE S1>8S. SPACIJ\G OF J0U"1'S PER INDUSTRY STANMRO. IRRK;ATIO'.I S'l'SIEM S-iALL BE D[SIGl'.[J TO PRE.VEN l lHE SATIJRATON CF SOI!. AD,IACE~ T TO BULOl'-IG i~x·, E-(---.... r· ' I; .• :r· j \ r : ; -....,.,, .... -' ~, '.... • .i. JAN 1 9 CITY Of RfNYON PLANN ING DIVIS10r\ '797 \ S[C ·c·c ,.•,:l ~o&~;-\....-----v g I .,, I I ~ ~ < .,, I 0 ; ~ I "' < " DRA WN CHECKEO JOB -..io 5216 rnII Jense n/Fey ,\RCHIT ECTURE & PL.II ~NING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMON D. WA 98052 'l. •:, ;15c,J~'(J ·~ RENTO ~ SPEClA.L CARE. OOMMU~rTY LLC 2731 1i"'AVE SE S TE l03 J,'(:;i:ccR SSLA..'>ID WA 90040 Q MAGNET design +development j1 il >-Ji ·' I-!J z ~ ::) ' ~ ~ 0 0 w w 0:::: (I) <( 0 w I'---. _J ::) I.() <( z ..--w co 0 > (J) w <( :<( ! 0... £S (I) z co '.) z oz 0 ..--0 0... i I-C') I-z C') z w w OW I-! 0:::: ~a:::: (I) ; SHE.ST A101 OF SHEETS /sA;--z,____ \':'._/ l @--- b ·6 -; (BB) L I 939 SF Dl~i~t1~d)M 26'-0" rec,, KJtcHENrn-1 ~-ti------------- 939 SF I B-17 I FAMILY ROOM ~ I 9'-1 112" --,~ .. _:r_ ___ -= ' ; 8'-6" i I , • 111 SF --··-r·· ,ITT,l, SIOEAPf"l'I 11'~ CLE~E ',:BEDROOM (' 5'-0"CLEAR 1:ih SF ~I' -J21 I I ENI . CLEAN 11 utv..._ rs-2,_ -~ ------ \'.:7 ------~---~ Q, ~I ~ ~ I I ~ -· =i I J:l_ · ~'.i)-', I -~---- I 1 @,) (,)-f,~~0 1 R_:LAN COTTAGE B '(_ 8'--6"' g:-1-)14" Is~ ~') 12'-7 114" J ~ ~, ........ , ·= --i__J 150SF '-~3 I DOUBtE , BEDRC>q~f f 111 SF , ~"~·~ 1 .. 8!~~t-·~~ BEDROOM SINGLE 9"-1 1/4"" (EIB' '-~j (1391 \._.~; r, 16101 / 100'-2" @ ' 12'-7 114" 12'-7 1/4" U-71/4" ---I_ ---__________.. r;..;:, ./ •7' ,>lll"80D ,--~~1SF J----------,' ~ -,11, -'_BEDROOM :. ' i 1/s, _, 1""'1 ' )3ATHROOM #31 12'-0" 150SF Q;,;:LJ \ B~OROOM :. . . ' , L~ 6'-0"CL~-- ---===== 319SF I ~ / CIR NA I<\, 111 SF L!~--1 ~~':'"!'"cfl~ BEOROOM··f-',~~~I I ~1-- 5'-0"' CLEAR \ __ 111 SF ~~~~:)~s~ .... ~ .. ~_+-~BEDROOM -SINGLE // '-~ / ~L-/ 100SF , ,, 11-1-a'-o --~· L B-S J :io:,c.J ~ BEDROOM-~!~~ "<jS":'01 ~' BEDROOM · 1-------::=-H ''"I 1 11 -0 > / f" I --.9-,8 ---,- ' ; ' ; / • _.« r 111 SF [Sl~LE! \ BEDROOM -----~!: "t"' I·' r;l~~: ---., 4l">OO"DEO -~tfr:~;, ~ 1,' N -- BEDROOM-~ - 12'-11" ,, ,,., ,,... ·1 1 1 "'1 ,._,,,,. -L.~ ··~ @ / 9'-11W ,l ---~~ /~/ -18101 'LI/ ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ --------"-4,747SF CD ~ ss"1 '._/ ~I L~_\I 4~ .. Y 2 ~j ,1 11!3~ m,rr~.-:-i © ~~ci '\_----- I I ! I g I ~ ~ I gl I ~I I I 0 e " 0 • ~ ~ 5 " . . '.J C: 0 "+ --~ ~ ~ i " , D~A,VN CHECKED JQB NO 5216 Ifill Jensen/Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND, WA 98052 n'L"'"'"'° '" RE~TON SPEC""L CARE CO ... MUNITT LLC 2731 lllhAVE SE STE 203 llERCER ~LAND. WA 9l'040 0 MAGNET design +development !, ,I >-l• -· I-H z ~ ::, :i: :i: 0 u co w w w 0:: (/) (c) <i: w r---~ u ' _J ::, l() I-<i: z~ 0 w <X) 0 > O') u w 1~ z ' Cl. ::i ; (/) ' <X) ' Cl. z oz 0 ~o 0:: ; I-"' I-0 z "' z 0 ~ w ow _J 0:: ~ 0:: u. ' SHEET A121 Oc SHEETS i Q2 tBE 1---+---~. ~ ,, a @) 'I I ----L- /-\ (vi _; II /C3: /~ I: . ( C2) . 9 ._, ,, 4 .. 9 ., , .... (c.i' _:; 13'-6 1/4" " 9'-1114" --;{--• ----- --- I 'I ' ' tj I ; (_::__t-- a,- --_J ,, -' _/ "'EDROOM ' ~ ..... ,.... 1 BEDROOM l'JIO~HI ~ I c::e-1 _ E , ··m-sr" ,. .. , .... 1 I [ 100SF 1 ':' I, --- > " ~:,:'~" ' --• /-i I; l ! ·~-, -( ~o ' I ,, _:::.\ -~DOUBLE \ --I BEDROOM ~. 8 ---~'c-o"c''c· s·-, 11•· g.111•· I 11 ,,I 1 --E \-=u--- ' t ---- ' ~ ! I\ -' / / /" -\ SINGLE ' ; SINGLE ' / SINGLE \ BEDROOM ~-;-w-:,48. BEDROOM ~:;:-30 .-,-.... BEDROOM Cl¢IOR• ---:-;;·...- ,cCii ISl[lEAl'P-CH !CTI sbf:APPROACH ~ S!PEAP f<OACH '---ni-sF--' / CLl,t\RAOCE ~ C!..EAFIANCE I --iuu-sr I , CL~ ANCE \ I -, ~ r~ ' ----\ -----\. --<"", , I ,-- ~ '· / 'I 'j .j3~ S_E ' /~ ~ t >< ~I I / ' ' ' ; --\, (~~\I CE -------• --------4 ~r @1 LM~OM ~ ~ - "I dF ' ' ' ( . • I :: ~ _1=__ . - @)--1 'f i=· -f ---- !~(l I 6'..(J'"CLEAR Lr-l Q_--c ,11 I ; .;~:Q~~I / I CIRCULATION A ~319SF~ IC::-·, I,_____, ., 1,--Q), • --\iM~l II - iµ_.:._ijATH~~OO -,_ 11 c=I ---.. /f:'~ I ·~ --I I -~--------I ,C I COEAN I ® 1 ~ ' ,, ,JL 1 SINGLE C-26 I ' BEDROOM 1 1 /- EJ \~1( ' -· / Orn e I C"25 ' 77S ' ' 'T ! ' FAMILY ROOM ~ ill -j f-raJ 18 fci)--1--------------------H-~ ~ ,, ' ' \' ~ lA '" ~ i CIRCULATION B ~--' 1 -,··· --c' ·-• '-f0UB1JS_' -"'1 _ -. ' ' , ,--- ' ' ' . ---~-·--,-"" ' ''--~ ,. -, ·: -"'· ····-' "" ----,-= -··=.~ I____ 1-. , J L _ 1 BEDROO,, _ _ • ~ - ' \ ~ -I ~i§__J lpoo,< • , .. •k 1,r ;, I' _,/ -... I --Ol'.>OR+ / \ )0","8" L _:_· _QOUBLE 1 , ....=.e.<:Hi r BEDROOM I tLEAAANCI ·,~-"--- ' ~ / I .-------I I--- I 5'-0" CL CAR L I I _) u1r---r ' ,, B:~;~M~ ~~ ~1·111'·~·~~ \ ..._'---nrsr ,. rl------l t- i ,_,_ I I TCHENETTE i ' ; I ~0----L---~------. ~ b. " ----I i •• -~ ' l 1----1~ ~ ' ,---r, =-=4-1=--c I !I I -l I ""''" ,,_,,,.. rn,: . I .' 12'-71/4 12"-7 \/4" ' ~ , d,, ~--./ l (s) (, FIRST FLOOR PLAN ~) 1 /4" ~ l'-0" I @ 100'-2" ~ l @) -------- D DINING ROOM ~ ,@ 4,747 SF cb e -----(sG' __ v J Ci-i -rsJ ~F sm rr7:.-;:-·1 Qi ~~I. \\,, Ci '\._..----"" - I I ! ~ , 11 ~ 0 ' ii I I . ' Z' 8. ., z' ~. ·' ~' .r I ~ rs: <f. "'' I 0 ; ,_ --~ " * , ! DRAWN CHEC~EO JOB NO 5216 Ifill Jensen/Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND, WA 98052 l( '""-'""" ,., RENTON SPEC~L CARE COMMUNJTY LLC ~73111'!!, AVE SE STE 2M MERCER ISLAN~. WA 5.\W40 0 MAGNET design _..development i, l' ,I >-Ji -· I-!I z ~ :J ~ ~ 0 0 0 w w w 0:: en (9 <( 0 w r--<( ~ . ---' => l[) <( z~ 0 W 00 0 > Cl) 0 w <( ,< z ! o_ .s s: ::s , en 00 o_ z oz 0 ~o 0:: ! I-("') I-0 z ("') z 0 j w Ow ---' 0:: ~ 0:: LL. SHEET A122 o, SHEETS i C',.._ \•~y' (o6: ( r -- (rm "-.._/ 9'-1 114" I 9'-1 114" l§J 9'-1114" (~-\ ~ J ;-........ 'DB', j --1---------I----, j '---' I 9'-1 1/4" 9'-1 114" 9'-1 114" ---1 ---1- ~ (D9) 13'~1£ I-~ Jk 010 'fV ---(r}E/-t---------J r1 1 ·_1 • w-@ ; ---tJ--L I I ~ (DE' ~-) b _, ID 'k- 1 I LIVING ROOM ~ 939 SF // ·~ ( l " - L__------1 r ll ; SINGLE ,oi">o,,:-.io';.,;;., BEDROOM l 'SIDE AWRC.U.I{ ~ CUARANCE, ~ ! ' I I ~ 8'-6 ~ 8'-6" . ~ SINGLE , BEDROOMO:.X,...,., .. ~..,c. oc,o·R-•lO"·l<<Mi·•BEDROOM BEDROOM• ---BEDROOM ·,~ Q..3 l 'Sl(}EAPPROACH SfDEMPF<OA<iH' ~ ~ ~ ' 3G' I ' 111 SF :,-CLEARANCE CLEARANCE ' ~ ,' ~ ~ , ~l~I ' ' 5'-0" CLEAR ~~~ /~i~ / I (--M--\k II -'It~ D I o'.Jl~-1l;::::t':::=:'.J -\ \, ' ' ' ~' ' T'~-~ -- ) ' d L __________ _ ,-! ,+ ~I!! LE I; { 'fii'/800" F= . ,137 SF DOUBLE ' ,c ,,c;-;, J • " • .r "' ---..cc....~ - I I I~ ~ I j !___ .,:llEc~ 'I /-·:-, 1:~,f------ ' ~: ' I _/ CIRfY.L,ATION A I -"" D-19 \ -319SF 1 r: BEQ_ROOM- ~ L__\ _: l Ii ~ k1·--~ I I I I I (oGL--c__; -__ _..::c T- r J I v~ ii lr I I I I I t- FAMILY ROOM ~ t-----~------- DINING ROOM ro:ie I '--o:l9SF " ; ----~ -I ==:Ji ~ ~ I ! ~ RIC FIRrPtACE 5'..0"CLEAR I -,--,, , / ", ,<C2 .[}; 6'-0" CLEAR ,-1-1;3_Nf!ROOM#~ -J,._ -t,-- ""S iio ,: " a3a .. oax .. t~ · l*' U'JlLITY P--L r' 0"~~ I ¢]. 0 81 C ~ aATHROOM#\IG fC -• • D-26 ,' ,, -~--G -~l~-L__ r--. SINGLE I l ~ ,: BEDRC>QM Y- I== . ' , • I D-8 I .. l!: -\ ',1f1 SF ,-' I l 5'-0" CLEAR 5'-0"CLEAR CIRCULATION B ~ -----=--=--=;--~-~ ~ Ill I( • ~ ! I~ d 00 ROOM ~ ( .. " ,;.;~~.:.-@= I <O BE-DROOM '. 137 SF ,o:,i: ', -.. --I OOOl\•1u-·~"'·· ~-;-r- ~ , I ,~c..::~'.:.... '- / .. . ,ow~' 0 SINGLE ,~Mi,;;,~~~~ I DOUBLE/opUBLE ~i~; ~O;~BL~ ~ DOUBLE ;:z.;_ 1i11! ><:'.>VOY~ s'.BEDROOM LEA~ I :eEDROOM------~ BE~EDROOM ~ 1:1,EOROOM ' • HEPROOM: ' ~ .. .!lr•.Oi:'+><'" ~ ··11SF.,~~ .!(i=T2--fB--11-f\-'~ ~ -~1~FI '~/ '.~, 136SF-__1?7:SF \f51YSF. ~ i - ill r I I I I I I I KJTCHENETTE•i' -: -~ ,--, - I I B'--B'S1NGLE BEDROOM I e-14 , 111 SF 12"·0 114" 11·-11117 I I I I ---~-~ 12'-0" ------ I I I L_ I: lQ:id I ,.,.~,rorr 1 ~ I i F @·~--~ -I ~I I I I , J ------------------------:_ -i-1---------1------------i -_;--------~ -I 2B'-D'' , J , ,,,, I ,, , ,,.. I I I 12·-1114:..._______i L_! I 100'-2" @ ' @ ~ @ (,)--r,-;~ ~'RP LAN -CO TT AGE D I . . ~:.: . : ...... : . · 1 J-----! ~-, I--~-+-~~anm hT,"llll· 12'-7 1/4" 12'-7 11 25'·B"" l @ ~ D1QI ,__, ~ 4.WSF ffi I -~ a ~ /'-)_ ----1DF1 1"---../ -' I I?--··:,, --{tJ~ ,L:::o ~:°.;/ ~ 1DH1 \'.:::_j I ~ ''"' \"·----~ll - .. \\ (j \]'~ --- ~I I I I I' i ~I I I I ~I ' t I ; ~ e 11 DRAWN CHECKED JOB NO 5216 Ifill Jensen/Fey 0 ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND, WA 98052 I r,_ '"""'"'" '"' f;Et-lTON SPECIAL-CARE CO~MUNr-1' l-LC 2731 77thA\I~ 5E STE 203 MERCER !SIANO WA 9II040 0 MAGNET design +development /: z ::::> :.'? :.'? 0 u w a::: c3 _J <( u w Q_ Cl) z 0 1-z w a::: oe w Cl) w I'-::> LI) z~ wro > cr, ~~ ro -oz ~a <') I- <') z OW ;:: a::: SHEET A123 0 w (.'.) ~ b u ' h B 1, !I ~ I: Q_ a::: r O! 01 _J LL SHEETS i ' r;:> V"_,r---, re)----~ ~j--_: I fa.1 13"·8112" OFFICE I D-1s 57 SF .;2, ".?' " • D-18 j 19 SF I I! I L : i £ ,e,.,_ -j n I ~ r , . , (E) _ _ . ; -~ J '.-----0 . . 1 0 • sl I l C 'rn c·FI~ LAUNDRY -~-_I I c-.27 I e 134SF r?·~-\.:___) ~-- L __ ,...__ ' " I ,A1 .1 6 I'.__";) 8 F 1 ~~?,R_:LAN ADMIN 16'-4112" ~--'\ '-"3 I ( (--. ...., ~ f' • I I L I I 14"-5112" . . • ' I RISER D-26 I 54SF ---' -- ' . RECORDS ,~-\ IA':) i _J ___ _ / -;. E~U;' Tif .. • • -o:,o J h. ' 63SF "' I t=il Tc@_ja>Y ~ 1 101sF IT /COMt.1 [EJ 46 SF ' ,,_ 0 ~<> ~BREA~ , I ~" I 1 I NUR[~£-JYl1E 133SF I <Y'r~ cir 0 17'-10 1/2" 10' -6" 1;;.;·, \,( ,_,._,. __ _J __ I J OfFICE I ASSISTANT DIRECTOR' Ji',] ~----j 99 SF • ' f=1 I --, I L ___ _ 1/\ 'y) (t-61 ( I I I ---,- I . I, I ------f-m--I ------==- RECEPTION ro:,i 289 SF c:1~ DIRECTOR'S t:j OFFICE ,0:, D '"j1 .'11 D ~ '=:J'-! '. '---• ' I I ,, I: rr 1: I -1------ 1 t=====!Jt .. rr --------_j'_ I , _cn_1_ I ' -i-~ I I ' ' _____!13") '--=· _/c;j x 'DI ------,\...:_j (-'- ~) I -t-© I .l - I --------L': ____________ J_ ! I -------- , --------1--~ I @ 8 @ (16' =/ 2.778 SF 4 ~m r,,;::-;:, -'c,l \i7t ',.; ' ·'.' I t~-01!·~· ~: ~I ~I ~, ' g1 zl! 2 • ~ ~ ~ C. ., CI'' ~ ; " ; DRAWN CHECKED J06NO ~v ' I 5216 Ifill Jensen/Fey (j) .!.. - ARCHITECTURE & PLAN.\llNG 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND, WA 98052 "'-"'-"""" '" RENTON S?EC.\L CARE COMML·NITY LLC 27311711\AV~SOSTEWl MERCER ISuO.ND. WA 90040 n MAGNET design +development l, I• u. >-Iii I- z ~ ::;;; ::;;; 0 u <( L1J L1J L1J 0:: Cl) (!) <( L1J ,.._ ~ u ...J ~ L() I-<( z~ 0 L1J OC) u > a, u L1J ~~ 51: 0.. Cl) OC) 0.. z oz 0 ~a 0:: I-(") I-0 z (") z 0 0 L1J L1J ~ 0:: ...J 0:: u. SHEET A124 OF SHEETS dm JJ/dYIJXJdOJ. ___ .. __ _ qqogs \IM 'NOJN]ll 'JS ]/W I roL t AllNnriwoo 3HVO 1VI03dS NO.LN3H • :JQ1 I-I ' ' (~, ""''" -, 1 .ll",<>.10 ~ I a:? a" j; ii !'! I'! I! Ool ,R 1,1 i!I ' ~: ,i I ~ -·~·'-""' ... ,.,., ........ VJ§ L ~oz ·z ( .>.:l:llinN\lr It Jill uone:Jndd\f MaJMH ue1d aJ1s ~' I T1 ''I r~ o UJ c/ ~"1[ l'.J C rl'11 '' • ,<"'' II ll 1f t e11c:c:1 f-i ";; ! II: I \IM ·uowei, 3S enua,w 4lWl LtoH ~ .e~c ~b I };J!unwwo::, ~o . ; ~a. ...J ~u aJe:) 1epads uo1ua~ j cd.i e., Hl£ .... j! l j ! l l l J J l J j J j l j l l . j J j ! J, , ~1 I l I . J j ' l ''J· I~ ; l~ ~ J; Jr • ·H }; J; H : l• I ~ I ~ I ~ ! ! ! ; l. ' l : ' p, ,e ' ' . j, !h n, ' ' .. ' .• ~ . : ~ : -: ~ : ' ' '' ' ' I i: j l l IHL l 1 iH! l ' J ! ii n 1 HI ·1 j t r~ '~; ! ' . ' ' 1 ' ; { ' ' l ' ; ' ! ~ j ' l r ; l ] : l ! ! l } ' ! ! f l ' ! ; ' ' l i > ' ? j " ' j 0 ' ll c ' ' ; z I w ' ' ;. ' > J ' I i ! l ' I i f f f ; ! I ' J l ' ' l i l l d ! I l ; l l ' ' ' ' ' z ' ; '; w tJt w . ~ ' ' . ' ~ . ' ' ' ' .. . ...... ,-. ... , Renton Special Care C, unity 17033 108lh Avenue SE Renton, WA 98157 Site Plan & Conditional Use Submittal Materials 24. Tree Retention Work Sheet DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT --------Renton® TREE RETENTION WORKSHEET Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 I www.rentonwa.gov l. Total number of trees over 6" diameter', or alder or cottonwood trees at least 8" in diameter on project site 56 trees ------- 2. Deductions: Certain trees are excluded from the retention calculation: 3. Trees that are dangerous' Trees in proposed public streets Trees in proposed private access easements/tracts Trees in critical areas 3 and buffers Total number of excluded trees: Subtract line 2 from line 1: 18 trees ----- 20 trees _;cc..,_ __ _ O trees ----- 0 trees -=---- 38 trees ------- 18 trees 4. Next, to determine the number of trees that must be retained 4 , multiply line 3 by: 0.3 in zones RC, R-1, R-4, R-6 or R-8 0.2 in all other residential zones 0.1 in all commercial and industrial zones 5. List the number of 6" in diameter, or alder or cottonwood trees over 8" in diameter that you are proposing 5 to retain 4 : 6. Subtract line 5 from line 4 for trees to be replaced: (if line 6 is zero or less, stop here. No replacement trees are required) 7. Multiply line 6 by 12" for number of required replacement inches: 3.6 trees 2 trees 1.6 trees 19.2 inches 8. Proposed size of trees to meet additional planting requirement: {Minimum 2" caliper trees required) 2" inches per tree 9. Divide line 7 by line 8 for number of replacement trees 6 : (If remainder is .5 or greater, round up to the next whole number) 9.6 trees 1 Measured at 4.5' above grade. 2 A tree certified, in a written report, as dead, terminally diseased, damaged, or otherwise dangerous to persons or property by a licensed landscape architect, or certified arborist, and approved by the City. 3 Critical areas, such as wetlands, streams, floodplains and protected slopes, are defined in RMC 4-3-050. 4 Count only those trees to be retained outside of critical areas and buffers. 5 The City may require modification of the tree retention plan to ensure retention of the maximum number of trees per RMC 4-4-130H7a. 6 When the required number of protected trees cannot be retained, replacement trees, with at least a two-inch (2") caliper or an evergreen at least six feet {6') tall, shall be planted. See RMC 4-4-130.H.l.e.(ii) for prohibited types of replacement trees. 1 P:\16561_Renton SCC\04PR0DUCTS\Arborists Report\RSCC 2016 12 20 Tree Retention Worksheet.doc Rev: 08/2015 Minimum Tree Density A minimum tree density shall be maintained on each residentially zoned lot (exempting single-family dwellings in R-10 and R-14). The tree density may consist of existing trees, replacement trees, or a combination. Detached single-family development': Two (2) significant trees 8 for every five thousand (5,000) sq. ft. of lot area. For example, a lot with 9,600 square feet and a detached single-family house is required to have four (4) significant trees or their equivalent in caliper inches (one or more trees with a combined diameter of 24"). This is determined with the following formula: ( LotArea ) . . ., x 2 = Mrmmum Numbero1 Trees 5,000sq.ft. Multi-family development (attached dwellings): Four (4) significant trees 8 for every five thousand (5,000) sq. ft. of lot area. (_ LotArea ) \s,ooosq.ft. x 4 Minimum Number of Trees Example Tree Density Table: Lot Lot size Min significant New Trees Retained Trees Compliant trees required 1 5,000 2 2@ 2" caliper 0 Yes 2 10,000 4 0 1 tree (24 caliper Yes inches) 3 15,000 6 2@ 2" caliper 1 Maple -15 Yes caliper inches 1 Fir -9 caliper inches. Renton sec Tree Density Table: Lot Lot size Min significant New Trees Retained Trees Compliant trees required 1 21,160 s.f. 17 17@ 2" ca lip 0 Yes 2 44,594 s.f. 36 33@ 2" calip 1 maple (10" Yes calip) 1 maple (8" calip) 7 Lots developed with detached dwellings in the R-10 and R-14 zoned are exempt from maintaining a minimum number of significant trees onsite, however they are not exempt from the annual tree removal limits. 8 Or the gross equivalent of caliper inches provided by one (1) or more trees. 2 P:\16561_Renton SCC\04PRODUCTS\Arborists Report\RSCC 201612 20 Tree Retention Worksheet.doc Rev: 08/2015 Renton Special Care Co unity 17033 1081h Avenue SE Renton, WA 98157 Site Plan & Conditional Use Submittal Materials 25. Arborist Report (+&fl~) • environments Planners Architects landscape Architects Urban Designers Geospatial Analysts Seattle I Jacksonville 1925 Post Alley Suite 38 Seattle, WA 98101 USA t 001-206-650-8589 1035 Kings Avenue Jacksonville, FL 32207 USA t 001.904.296.8066 info@elmenv.com www.elmenv.com @elmerl\l January 16, 2017 TREE ASSESSMENT REPORT PREPARED FOR: Kevin Carl, Magnet D+D PREPARED BY: Greg Murphy, Landscape Architect, WA License #1124-ELM Environments SITE ADDRESS: 17033 108'" Avenue SE, Renton Washington SUMMARY The following is an inventory of 56 existing trees at the site of the proposed Renton Special Care Community. These trees were inventoried on October 21, 2016 to determine species, trunk size, canopy size, overall condition, and opportunity for preservation during construction of a multi-family special care community proposed for construction on the site. SITE DESCRIPTION The site consists of two adjoining parcels forming a slightly trapezoidal property measuring approximately 302'x 209' containing 65,754 s.f. (1.5 acres). The smaller northern parcel is developed with an existing single family residence and out building, and the larger southern parcel is undeveloped. The site is accessed by 108th Avenue SE along the east perimeter and SE 172nd Street along the south perimeter. Site topography varies from approx. elevation +412 in the northeast corner to +400 in the southwest corner creating a gradual and consistent slope to the southwest. No !ow points or ponding water were observed. The site includes 56 significant trees (minimum size 6" caliper or 8" caliper for cottonwood and alder) and the size and condition of each is described in the attached Tree Assessment Spreadsheet. Five of the significant trees qualify as landmark trees with trunk caliper of 30" or greater. In addition to the trees inventoried, the site is heavily vegetated with understory woody plants. The understory houses native species including vine maple saplings and beaked hazelnut, but is dominated by invasive species, primarily Himalayan blackberry with occasional English holly. PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed Renton Special Care Community consists of four multi-family residential buildings and associated parking, walks, gathering spaces and landscape that will be occupied by senior citizens and staff. As part of this project, road widening and public sidewalk installation is proposed along 103th Ave SE and SE 172nd Street on the east and south side of the site respectively. SITE ZONING The site is zoned R-14 (Residential) and is subject to Renton Municipal Code 4-4-130 Tree Retention and Land Clearing Regulations, and 4-4-070 Landscape and Tree Preservation requirements. METHODOLOGY Trees were inventoried by visual assessment performed by Greg Murphy and Callie Roberts of ELM Environments and documented in the attached "Tree Inventory Plan" and "Tree Assessment Report." A topographic survey prepared by others was used as a base for locating and identifying the trees, and tree caliper measurements in this report are based on the surveyed size except trees 2, 5, 11, 15, 191 42, 46, and 56 which did not appear on the survey and were field measured. OBSERVATIONS The dominant native tree species on site are Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum) with three western red cedar (Thuja plicata), one black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa), and five western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla). Non-native species include six Austrian pine (Pinus nigra) and four apple trees (Malus pumila). The non-native species are located near the existing residence suggesting they were planted and not self-seeded. Most of the existing trees are clustered along the east edge of the property. Because of the varying tree density on site, most trees have asymmetrical and irregularly shaped canopies and several trees exhibit phototropic lean due to varying sunlight conditions. One Douglass fir was observed and noted to have been girdled by a cable or other attachments, but little other intentional damage to the trees was visible. CONSIDERATIONS Because the buildings and open spaces of the proposed special care facility will be inhabited by elderly and special needs individuals who may have vision, mobility or cognitive impairments, special consideration must be made for trees that could pose hazards in the form of branch or litter drop, trunk breakage, or tree uprooting. Construction excavation and grading will likely impact the shallow rooting Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum) subjecting the trees to the potential of gradual decline and the risk of future structural failure. Therefore, trees that could potentially damage buildings or injure people have been identified in the assessment as "Hazard Trees." These hazard trees are excluded from tree salvage requirements. Due to the mobility concerns of the intended residents, the proposed project requires buildings and walks to be at matching elevations with no steps or ramps, requiring site grading modifications to provide the necessary building and walk adjacencies. Additionally, the pavement edges of 108th Ave SE and SE 172nd Street are being adjusted and new public walks are being added as part of city required right of way improvements which will necessitate grade adjustments beyond the right of way and into the site. The extent of these site grading modifications limits opportunities to preserve existing trees. The proposed project includes gradual slopes and new plants, so slope stability due to tree removal should not be a concern. RECOMMENDATIONS Recognizing the impacts that construction will have on the existing trees, and the risk of future branch drop or structural failure, it is recommended that trees be preserved only if they are small, ideally 6" to 8" caliper, located away from buildings or pedestrian areas, and in a location where root disturbance from construction excavation and grading will be minimized. Existing trees to remain should be protected by construction fence installed at the dripline radius per the City of Renton's standard construction detail. Since most of the site trees will likely be removed, a revegetation plan should be prepared meeting Renton's landscape requirements (RMC 7-7-070). ATIACHMENTS L0-0 Tree Inventory Plan dated 12/20/2016 Tree Assessment Spreadsheet RSCC 2016 12 20 Tree Assessment Report STATE OF WASHINGTON REGISTERED LAND CAPE ARCHITECT ' CHRISTOPHER L. ovrnooRF CERTIFICATE No_ 972 Page 12 Renton Special Care Community Tree Assessment 54" obo,o Drlpline No. Grode Radlu, Bmank•I Name !l' Populu, tmocarp.a 11"'-I"' Ac,· macrcphyllue, U" •. P><udal5ug, menz.e,i1 ,.. CammDn N•m• Bl,ck [onoowood Bi.gleafMapl, f-~+='='-'"--tc-~~r"='=' m='="="=''=""=m~------t='"'-leaf_~,~-,.. l!callh& Condi<ion 11.,tini {llow-5 hl1h) l!nlth &Condi!lon D<><:Tlpllon Numerous waw S,oots on t•ua<, wea< wood. br.tnchandliteerdrop -..,ulti-5!em" 6 trun<s. a !ew dcwnward archi~l - branche,. >e,,eral dead limb,, phototropic lean Good oond1taon Broken cent!al l<ader, minor dead w.iod. "•• '"' Rcmo,•1 du•to Ill environment5 Priority Huard Dr [RMC l>ndmorlt i,topo,ed Remove f 4.4.130) lro• R.CJ.W. Retain Priorit~ Nole, __ _l.i•. __ _ --~"~":>,+-''c'c'"c''"'-l"Sigc•cifi~c"c'c"'c' ________ ---j ------~·9..:_\":·-t-'"cm=•="---t-'="="="c"='='='"='=''="="='clim=O='---- ,., >----:~~~ I •. ~rn_:"'!-~·:;~~~;:;':':,o<en central INder. m ;,-,,-,.-.i- -_ ~_.'c':_W. ~emoV< wood, downwa,d growmg bran,he, 2.11 Hazard/ flame,,..,· >1Rnili<ant hole al bas@ of tru~lc. .. S' -~•_rm•!>"''''>>'e'•crn _____ --j'•,••s•e•'cMs•s•',•-------+-~-+''''""'"'''"''"''"'>"s•e•c••so•e•oe==oc"'C'<">WO•~-+---+---+"""'""~J-'""''mc•c•--j'">"c"-=°'c'c"'C'C"'<"~-------1 ~-8"M 8,g1.eafMaole "" lQ' P,eudCll>uga men,ie,il a• TO"japlicata Weste,nRe-dCeda, " ,o .. 12' Pseudotsu•a men>ie<II Mul\i m,m 3 sriall stem, in addition to main trunk Minotdeadwcod In canopy S,gnificant broken b'inch, tr:m<" fock,d ,t mod """''· seV<"ral b<oi<en branches S,e..,,ral dead limb,, trun<" g,rdled ne,r ba,.,, «raigh, ,no mongcen<ral leader VI RO.W RO.w R,move s,gn1ncanttree H,,.,d/ R.O.W Rec,ov,, 4a,ard tr"' -forlced <run<. b'olen branches Ha,ard / rlawd tree -,......,,.1 d .. d lm,b,, trunk i, t!i,dl•d by R.O.W Remov,, termer cable A-,~'c'"-+--'"'-' -+'='~='"c"c"'c'crnc'"c"c'"c" -----+'"'""'""""""--------+-~--t"s'c"c'c"c07"cm•s•e"e",''c°'e'°7°c"e"c"•s's'"e"s"="s'"c"+-"'='-r""''0=rne"e'+-c~~+='='"c=~,',''=nil=•"="c' i="="='m='="='='"=' ------; N"rrwous dead hmb,, stra,ght central leader, thrn Ha,ard / B" Pseudo""g' men,1e,li Dougla,Flr canopy R.O W Remove Haiard trO<' num@,ou, dead limb, lla,ard/ 1-c"~·t-""="-1-c'='-r'="c""c"c'","=rn=•c"'="='''~----e'c'",''="="c' _______ -t-~~-F's"s"c"c"c''s"='"c'=°'s'=~~~~~-1---t---f-'=·'=w~r"="e=~r"="='"c"=~~·=·="c"="="'c"c"="c0'c'.--~ Multi-,1ern S stem, -6"-10" cal,peach. G,owing 1nta ba,o oltr,,e ~16 Crack in or,o trunk. '""•rai St,ai,:ht central leader, a few small tlead limbs lS 12"M"" JS Acer m~crophyllum 2-"· ll.CJW. R•mooo, S1~nificanttr~-~-- f-C'"~t-"'°="-1-c'c' -r'c"c"'e"='",S'cmc•c"c''='i1~----F~c"c"c"c"c' -------+-~--c~:~i~~~:!';;:~ :n6~.:;:~ia s-ral broken l.v. f-C"~f-'c'"oM~I-"''' _1Acer macrop_hyllui, t,unk:i, m1>-shapen/rn1gled 51de<i canopy r-="~1-e'°,_·_1 __ ,,,s_' P,ewdo:,uz• ,:n•~~c_ _ ______ 4_ Stronicentral le_•de_r,_>D'l'e_ de•d wD<Jd 1n='='~~"=t-~'='~j---j---t-'"="='="=r'";gn=,C="'c°'c'="'~-----------j 14"•• ll' Pseudu,,uga me,,,,.,,; Dougla,F,r ,, Remo,, Signifi~at tree "" Austrian Pine Brol,:en central leader, some dead waod Ha,ard Remove Ha,ard tree -brokee cen1ral leader " Au,trian Pine Strai i,t leader, thin cano?Y. low ae,th<'tic valve 2;,; Row Remo"" Sig,,mcant tree AumlanPine Straight I.acer, th;n canopy. low ,esthe,icvalue :11il 6' Pinasni ,a AumianPine Strai ht leader, 1'.in canopy, lo'" aesthet,cvalue 2iil " 6' Pmu,ni ra Straight leader. :,in canopy, lowae'1het<c val"e :1iii RO.W R,mo•e s,•n1llcaottree ,s ,,. 6" P,no<ni ,a Au>tr;anP,ne 1tralgh1 leader, th,o ""OPY. lowae,ih,tic va'"e Vii R 'J.W R,mo,o S,gn1lic,nt tr•• '" ,. 10 Tsui• helerophylla "' R.a.w R,mm,, S1 n,fican! tr,e r-="-r-"'°c"~f-="~+"c"•c•c°'c"="='c''='"~------f=Wc"="c"'c"='mc,,c,c< _____ --f-~-rM=""=''="='c"='="'="='=°'='"=""c'=''-----f-='="--t----f~'='·="c· +'=•cm_~"!_~mf,unt,,.• Western _H_eml~k_ M1>·shapen canopy (cnM1d,Q) JO' T,u •hetornphylla W•st•rn Hemlock Mi,-,hapen canopy (ane-,;ded) lil R.O W RemO\'e S1 n;~ca,.t ,,., lt' P,eudct,ug• men"'"' ___ 4 C..llp!t ~·ab°"" l>tiphoe No. Grade l!adiu, B0t1nlc.ol Name " " ... JS" Acor macrcpO~llum 10 P••ucctst,·a meni,es,i !S P,.udorsu-, m,n,;.,,, '" 24" M 15 Am mac,.,,phyllum " u· &' Aw macrophyllum " ll" - Common Name W,ste,n Rede_._,,., Bi leaf Maple D<iula,F" D<iula,F,r Douglas Fir a,gle,rM,ple B·glea!Maple H,al1h& Condition R•lin1 [llow-5 hich) due1o PricMty Huard or IRMC l•ndmark propo,ed Rem<>n/ Health & Condition Ducription 4.4.1JD) Trtt R.O.W Retain PdorifyNcte< A few d,ad limbs r>ail,mt.-1.m< '" Remo,e Significant tree Alewlowhan 111glirnb, " LinOmarl< Remove Sig nit.cant/ Landm,r~ tree .\.\i•·•hapen canopy (one-sided]. lean;,g. a few broken t,,anche, l.oi A few broken limb " landriarl< Mr,-shape" canopy lun•-sicedl landmark R.a W Remo"' S1gn1fican1 / L3ndmari< ttee Malt,-,tem S" to 3", ,li~hlly m,,-,hapen. _ l.v R.a W Remo"' l,gn,fic,nl tree Broken l,mb>, crad«d trunis, oholo\ropic lean l.,r R,(!,W ~•moV<! ~1 rnhcanttr•• " 12" •• A<:<rm"'upl,yllum -<'<•'c••s•Mc•ae,• ______ _,_-'--._CThc"'o'c"o">'C"c''"""''-'"'""<'-'"'-'''"'"----1->'c''-1---1---'..."''''"'°""--"''"C">1rrc,,,.,,,.,,c _____________ _ " U" V•"I m1n1mal canopy 2ii -"-·--l->"C" _j_O"C' _j!'O">''S"S"S'''-' me•e•e,i•O"C' ____ _J;Oeoa,,easc•s• _______ --J-_s__j;•""'""d ove·,11 forc•, _________ 1-,>c• -1---'1---'-'c'c"c'"c..,cs1a0,0;fic0,,"c"c"~---------, c,I\Oi)y';S ba,0 at crown indlcatini possible de'ect ,.. 20' T'iujapl,c;ta Wes,.mRedCedor orarlme,,t lla,ard RemOVI' Huard tree -dlebacl: 31 crown 46 13" M"" !2 Ao,r macrophyllum ai·leafMaple Mul:,-stem4truolo.s5"-S"d1a __ ~.1i. ___ 1 ,. Ro move s;gn,fic;M tree '-'"'--1--''<'"-1--''''-<'-'"-'' mc•e">"'-'"'""''""------'0'£ "'"e'c' Mc•so•,• -------'--'----''""-'oo'-"''"-'"-'"C'c"O'-''"-''<''>''"''<'-'"-'"<"S"~--1--''·-''i._,1--Retain S1gn1ficanttree "''' ---+----''"'":_1-c>ea_~,,,. ... ,~, .. ,mso,,,, .. ._ _____ ~Weee>S<CCOC'S"C"'S"''------I----'--~"·""' "s~e"e"S'""'""""""''"S'000C00"C'''"~"!._ __ --J-__ +---l-"H~ia~~~-Remo,,. Haza,d tree-tMm1nallydisea,od __ _,,,-,•s"c"c"----------+-"---'"c'c'°<"'s•e•o•e'"o"'e'--------'~'c'~-l----l----1---"'''em~_ 5•Krnncant tree C-0'°'---LO'C'"-L_ ~· __ Acor macrop'1yllum __ Biglo.tMaple ,,. ll' Am mac-ophyllum B,glea/Map,e " ,.. LB' Maluspumrla ,,. ll Malusp~mila Apole ,,. !5 Malu,puc,lla Apple 10' Acer macrop"'Yllum 0iglea1Maple 10" •• JO Mal cs pumila A/>ple RaHnl S E,<ollont. no ,;,,ble damage. disease. deod wood. o, !om, defect, Very Good, no ""bled"""' or imign,frc.ant d"""'• """' minor d,mage, dead wc-od, and/or form defoct, Good, novl!lble disease or m,no, dl<ease, m,nordamage. dead 'MlOd, ard/or rr.inor form defem fa;,. mioor di sea,. po,sibly affect1n1 murlal,ty, ,ignrficant da-naKe, Oead weed, and/or form defee'"~ l'<lor, ,ri;,,ificant dlsea,o likl" affect;n8 mortal,ty, slgnlf·cant dama~e, dead wood and/or form defw,, pos,ible haiard, Mr,-,hapen trunk· Wil or>eo, multr-st,mmod Ire• ~awdtree-significanr-,-mis-shapen due to but ""''"I tr uni<, ha"' bees remwed leavi,-a M;,.,h,ll"n trunk -Wi> once, mult,-,t<mmed lreo bl!': '""''"I trunk, have been remo""d leavtn~ a Poor h,alth and poor canopy curdit1on. pa»itol, indication, of di,oa,o Pcm health and poor cacopy conei1,o,,, po.,,blo ,ndrcalicn, of d""''" Poor health and poor canopy cond1fon. pa!>rble 1nd,<a1lonsoldlsoa,e Porn-health and poorc.onopy condition, pn.,,bl• lndlcatloes ol di>ea,e l.1i Ha,a,d Ha,ard tre• • slgniOcanly mls-shapM due to Ha,ard Remo"" •emoval olmost trunks Hazard Remo"" Haiardlreo Wminallydis<asd Ha>ard Rem°"" Ha,,rd ,;,-o, terminally diseased "'"''d Remove Ha,ard tree terminally drseued Rer,i, Si!Jnificant,ree Ha,ard Remove Hazard tr••· terminal Iv di .. ased ll/lO/iOlG ''""'"" t-ca,,,-,, ·""' ''""'"""""'" "· '"' ,,,. --~-'' ~':'::',~\ J,-~--f\ LEGEND @'ill"""""" 1#.\1,'. ,) .. '"'''"'''"" ,s,<1"'"£!<'0<lYU,~ TREE INVENTCRY ,. -,-.,,·--------~-- SIGNIFICAH TREE FRIORITIZA •10N J!f-r1, COTTAGES Ill's;:- Q) ~ e "' u £ >,;-" £ _, .. -~ '2 ! ~ < Q,) :::::, :Jj ! a. E ! rn E ~ • • C 0 ! e . .Bu ~ ,: C ~ Q) C a<: .. -··~· .. ------ Tree Inventory & Retention Plan L0-0 Renton Special Care C_ ,unity 17033 1081h Avenue SE Renton, WA 98157 Site Plan & Conditional Use Submittal Materials Jc-\N t 'J ZG17 29. Biological Assessment/ Critical Area Study HABITAT TECHNOLOGIES May 12, 2015 Mr. Stein Skattum e-mail Skattum@comcast.net ,IL fr/;JlY ~Vll?fi? By JHE"/13/../.1:r. d F 1"f#3'3t!f!Jeer fPl.YP~ lff/;t/</Pt,e To: RtlJ{Of!Sf{Cfl(t-Clrt(JJ CC1/r(i/i RE: Critical Areas Assessment -Parcels 0087000285 and 0087000293 17033 -1081h Avenue SE, City of Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Skattum, Following your request Habitat Technologies has completed an onsite assessment of critical areas within Parcels 0087000285 and 0087000293 (project site) located at 17033 -108th Avenue SE within the City of Renton, King County, Washington (Figure 1). This onsite assessment and evaluation of critical areas (i.e. wetlands, streams, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas) within and immediately adjacent to the project site was completed following the methods and procedures defined in the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (1987 Manual) with the 201 O Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (2010 Supplement); the guidance provided for the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Wash Manual); the State of Washington Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) Forest Practice Rules (WAC 222-16-030); and the City of Renton Chapter 3, Title 4.3.050 -Critical Areas Regulations. PROJECT SITE DESCRIPTION The project site was composed of two existing parcels of record located within an older residential area that was quickly becoming re-developed with the infilling of higher intensity new multi-family residential communities and commercial uses. Parcel 0087000285 was rectangular in shape, was 1.02-acres in size, was present vacant, and formed the southern portion of the project site. Parcel 0087000293 was rectangular in shape, was 0.48-acres in size, was dominated by an existing single family homesite, and formed the northern portion of the project site. The project site was bound on the north and west by existing homesites, on the south by SE 172nd Street with a commercial day-care south of SE 172"d Street, and on the east by 1081h Avenue SE with a multi-family residential community being constructed to the east of this public roadway. Directions to the Project Site: From SR 167 in the southern portion of the City of Renton exit onto SE Carr Road and continue easterly along SE Carr Road to the Benson Highway (SR515). Turn north onto the Benson Highway and a short distance to Benson Road South. Turn northeasterly onto Benson Road South and continue to the intersection of SE 172"d Street and Benson Road South. The project site located at the northwestern corner of this intersection. wetlands, streams, fisheries, wildlife -mitigation and permitting solutions P.O. Box 1088, Puyallup, Washington 98371 voice 253-845-5119 www.habitattechnologies.net BACKGROUND INFORMATION National Wetland Inventory Mapping The National Wetland Inventory (NWI) mapping completed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was reviewed as a part of this assessment (Figure 2). This mapping resource did not identify any wetlands or drainage corridors within or immediately adjacent to the project site. State of Washington Priority Habitats and Species The State of Washington Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) Mapping was reviewed as a part of this assessment (Figure 3). This mapping resource did not identify any priority habitats or priority species within or immediately adjacent to the project site. State of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife The State of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife mapping was reviewed as a part of this assessment (Figure 4). This mapping resource did not identify any streams within or immediately adjacent to the project site. State of Washington Department of Natural Resources The State of Washington Department of Natural Resources mapping was reviewed as a part of this assessment (Figure 5). This mapping resource did not identify any streams or wetlands within or immediately adjacent to the project site. King County Inventory Mapping The King County Inventory Mapping was reviewed as a part of this assessment (Figure 6). This mapping resource did not identify any wetlands or streams within or immediately adjacent to the project site. This mapping did identify a coal mine hazard area offsite to the south of the project site. City of Renton Inventory Mapping The City of Renton Inventory Mapping was reviewed as a part of this assessment (Figure 6). This mapping resource did not identify any wetlands or streams within or immediately adjacent to the project site. This mapping did identify a coal mine hazard area offsite to the south of the project site -similar to the King County Inventory Mapping. 2 15061 Washington State Natural Heritage Program The Washington State Natural Heritage Program was reviewed as a part of this assessment. This resource did not to identify any high quality, undisturbed wetland or a wetland that supports state threatened, endangered, or sensitive plant species within the Section/Township/Range of the project site. ONSITE EVALUATION Criteria for Critical Areas Identification The City of Renton defines "critical areas" to include aquifer recharge areas, habitat areas, frequently flooded areas, geologically hazardous areas, streams, and wetlands. The assessment documented within this report focused solely on habitat areas, streams, and wetlands. No specific assessment was undertaken by Habitat Technologies for potential aquifer recharge areas, ·frequently flooded areas, or geologically hazardous areas. Wetlands: The City of Renton defines "wetlands" as those areas designated in accordance with the Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual, as required by RCW 36.70A.175 (Ecology Publication #96-94). "Wetlands" are noted as those areas that are inundated or saturated, by ground or surface water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. However, with the adoption of the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (2010 Supplement) the Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE) stated that to maintain consistency between the state and federal delineations of wetlands, Ecology has repealed WAC 173-22-080 (the state delineation manual) and replaced it with a revision of WAC 173-22-035 that states delineations should be done according to the currently approved federal manual and supplements. The changes became effective March 14, 2011 (https:l/fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/publications/ 1006002.pdf): Streams: A stream (aquatic area) is generally defined as a location where surface waters produce a defined channel or bed. A defined channel or bed is typically an area which demonstrates clear evidence of the passage of water and includes, but not limited to, bedrock channels, gravel beds, sand and silt beds, and defined channel swales. A stream need not contain water year-round. A stream typically does not include irrigation ditches, canals, storm or surface water run-off devices, or other artificial watercourses unless the constructed watercourse conveys a stream which naturally occurred prior to the construction of such watercourse. 3 15061 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas (FWHCAs): The City of Renton defines fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas as those habitats which meet any of the following criteria: • Habitats associated with the documented presence of non-salmonid species proposed or listed by the Federal government or State of Washington as endangered, threatened, candidate, sensitive, monitor, or priority; and/or • Category 1 wetlands. Onsite Assessment The onsite assessment of wetland, streams, and habitats was completed between mid- April and early May 2015. These assessments included periods of moderate to heavy seasonal rain events. These assessments followed the methodologies and procedures defined in the 1987 Manual with 2010 Supplement, guidance for the Wash Manual, and the City of Renton Chapter 3, Title 4.3.050 -Critical Areas Regulations. The project site had been modified by prior and ongoing onsite and offsite land use actions. These actions had included the development of single family homesites, the development of offsite multi-family residential and commercial land uses, and the development of public roadways and utilities. Field data work sheets are provided in Appendix A. • Plant Communities ONSITE: The plant communities throughout the project site had been modified by prior land use actions. The plant community within the northern parcel was dominated by a single family homesite. This plant community included a variety of retained native trees and shrubs, together with a variety of ornamental species and managed lawn. areas. This plant community was identified as non-hydrophytic in character (i.e. typical of non- wetlands). The plant community within the southern portion of the project site has also been modified by prior land use actions. However, this plant community had become re- established following there prior actions and included a variety of retained mature reproduction trees and often dense thickets of shrubs. Species observed included red alder (A/nus rubra), big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesi1), black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa), hawthorne (Crataegus spp.), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus procera), evergreen blackberry (Rubus /aciniatus), Scots broom (Cytisus scoparius), hazelnut (Cory/us comuta), vine maple (Acer circinatum), Oceanspray (Ho/odiscus discolor), snowberry (Symphoricarpus a/bus), Douglas spiraea (Spiraea doug/asi1), rose (Rosa spp.), ivy (Hedera spp.), knotweed (Po/ygonum cuspidatum), sword fern (Polystichum munitum), bracken fern (Pteridium aqui/ium), bedstraw (Galium aparine), and false lily of the valh,y (Maianthemum dilatatum). This 4 15061 plant community was identified as non-hydrophytic in character (i.e. typical of non- wetlands). A roadside ditch was identified along the southern edge of the project site -associated with SE 172nd Street. The plant community within this ditch was regularly mowed as a part of street maintenance actions and included Douglas spiraea, rose, Himalayan blackberry, evergreen blackberry, velvetgrass (Ho/cus /anatus), bluegrass (Poa spp.), fescue (Festuca spp.), bentgrass (Agrostis spp.), reed canarygrass (Pha!aris arundinacea), bracken fern, Canadian thistle (Cirsium atvensis), cats ear (Hypochaeris g/abra), and nettle (Urtica dioica). OFFSITE: The offsite plant communities to the west and north were dominated by existing single family homesite. The plant community offsite to the northwest exhibited similar characteristics to the southern portion of the project site. • Soil Characteristics As identified at representative sample plots the soil throughout the project site exhibited characteristics typically associated with moderately to moderately well drained soil. The majority of the surface soil also exhibited characteristics typically associated with prior grading, the placement of imported fill materials, and the mixing of assorted debris. The soil in the southern portion of the project site exhibited a gravelly sandy loam texture and a surface soil coloration of dark brown (1 OYR 3/2) to a depth of approximately five (5) inches. The subsoil to a depth of eighteen inches exhibited a brown coloration (10YR 3/3). The soil did not exhibit prominent redoximorphic features or any other field indicators of hydric soil. The soil within the roadside ditch along the southern boundary of the project site had been modified by prior land use actions. This soil also included a variety of intermixed debris. • Hydrology Patterns The project site appeared to drain well to moderately well and did not exhibit field indicators of wetland hydrology. The project site was generally flat as a result of prior grading with a slight slope from east to west. • Wildlife Observations As a result of onsite and offsite urbanization the project site provided limited habitats for wildlife species. The majority of these species are commonly associated with manipulated and modified environments common to urban areas. Species observed onsite or that would reasonably utilize the habitats provided by the project site included American crow (Cotvus brachynchos), Northern flicker (Colaptes auratus), bushtit (Psaltriparus minimus), house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus), black capped chickadee (Parus atricapil/us), dark eyed junco (Junco hyema/is), violet green swallow 5 15061 (Tachycineta tha//assina}, song sparrow (Melospiza melodia}, purple finch (Carpodacus purpureus), starling (Sturnus vulgaris}, house mouse (Mus musculus), deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus), vole (Microtus spp.), opossum (Didelphis virginianus), stripped skunk (Mephitis mephitis}, eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis), Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus), and coyote (Canis /atrans). The project site did not provide suitable spawning habitats for amphibians and did not provide habitats for fish species. State Priority Species: Priority species are defined by WDFW to require protective measures for their survival due to their population status, sensitivity to habitat alteration, and/or recreational, commercial, or tribal importance. Game Species: "Game species" are regulated by the State of Washington through recreational hunting bag limits, harvest seasons, and harvest area restrictions. The project site was not identified to provide habitats for State Game species. State Candidate: State Candidate species are presently under review by the State of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) for possible listing as endangered, threatened, or sensitive. The project site was not identified to provide habitats for State Candidate species. State Monitored: State Monitored species are native to Washington but require habitat that has limited availability, are indicators of environmental quality, require further assessment, have unresolved taxonomy, may be competing with other species of concern, or have significant popular appeal. The project site was not identified to provide habitats for State Monitored species. State Sensitive: State Sensitive species are native to Washington, are vulnerable to decline, and are likely to become endangered or threatened throughout a significant portion of its range without cooperative management or removal of threats. The project site was not identified to provide habitats for State Sensitive species. State Threatened: State Threatened species are species native to the state of Washington and are likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout a significant portion of its range within the state without cooperative management or removal of threats. The project site was not identified, nor documented to provide, critical habitats for State Threatened species. State Endangered: State endangered species are species native to the state of Washington and are seriously threatened with extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range within the state. The project site was not identified, nor documented to provide, critical habitats for State Endangered species. 6 15061 Federally Listed Species: The project site has not been documented to provide critical habitats for federally listed species. CRITICAL AREA ASSESSMENT FINDINGS The project site had been impacted by prior and onsite land use actions and was located within an older residential area that was quickly becoming re-developed with the infilling of higher intensity new multi-family residential communities and commercial uses. Onsite assessment did not identify any wetlands, streams, of fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas within or immediately adjacent to the project site. STANDARD OF CARE This critical areas assessment has been completed by Habitat Technologies for use by Mr. Stein Skattum. Prior to extensive site planning the findings documented in this document may be reviewed and verified by City of Renton resource personnel. Habitat Technologies has provided professional services that are in accordance with the degree of care and skill generally accepted in the nature of the work accomplished. No other warranties are expressed or implied. Habitat Technologies is not responsible for design costs incurred before this document is approved by the appropriate resource and permitting agencies. Thank you for allowing Habitat Technologies the opportunity to assist with your project planning. Please contact us with any questions or need for additional assistance. Sincerely, Bryan W. Peck Wetland Biologist 7ho f11 as JJ. JJeH111t.3 Thomas D. Deming, PWS Habitat Technologies 7 15061 FIGURES 8 15061 Figure 1 Site Vicinity he nrormaUon iicUd1111d on thS rrap has bean c ompied ~ King County s taff' from • varfety of sources and Is subj,ct to c:tiangc, wlhout no ti ce . K ilg Co unty makes no repreun1a tions orwarraities. express or lmpled, m t o ac:curacy,com p'91enes.,, trn etness. or ~ht, to U. use ofsuchlnformatim. Tlis d::lcument ls rot Intended b r use a s • surv1111y product. King County shall rot be liable fer any ge neral, 5P8cl111 I, ndired, l n d denta~ o r ronsequential damages lndudiig, but nd United to, bst revenues or b st pronts resuting from the use or misuse d t he i nformati;,n cailained o n t hi s map. My sal e of tNs map or lnformallcn on this map is prohitited Hcepl by w ti t en permlsslcn of Ki rg County. Date: 5/12/2015 King County 1 in : 376 feet 0 0.04 0.08 Miles j I .,.,.F ..... _....;.~.c.:;...J l . :{. .. ·l ; '1 ! . N A ,·; .\ . KiJ¥q:q,nt~ ·: tQ King County GIS CENTER User Remarks: TMa .... IDr ..... ,.,.MC. on1,. Tllo UI ,iati MCI Wldlfa l.n'lca II ft01 rupo",iw. 11w lhe HClll'aCJ ot curn"lneH or ttM '"'•• 41Ma llheMI N "".., AH _ ......... , .. ,.C. ehouhd 1M 0-.1 In atCGf'iNM• ...... h..,,.. ....._N .._. -.t ............... ,«_. .. ,,. Figure 2 NWI Mapping May 12, 2015 Wetlands -Fruhwater Emergent -Fre!hwater Fol1!sted1Shrub -E.siuarina and Marine Deepwater -ES1ua rlne and Marine -Freshwater Pond -Lake -Riverine .0th .. ) _) ~ -~-WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE : PRIORITY HABITATS AND SPECIES REPORT . SOURCE DATASET: PHSPlusPublic Query ID: P150512165548 REPORT DATE: 05/12/2015 4.55 DISCLAIMER. This report includes information that the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) maintains in a central computer database. It is not an attempt to provide you with an official agency response as to the impacts of your project on fish and wildlife. This infom,ation only documents the location of fish and wildlife resources to the best of our knowledge. It Is not a complete inventory and it Is important to note that fish and wildlife resources may occur in areas not currenUy known to WDFW biologists, or in areas for which comprehensive surveys have not been conducted. Site specific surveys are frequently necesssary to rule out the presence of priority resources. Locations of fish and wildlife resources are subject to vraition caused by disturbance, changes in season and weather, and other factors. WDFW does not recommend using reports more than six months old. 05/12/2015 4. 55 WDFW Test Map May 12, 2015 D PHS Report Clip A r ea • AS MAPPED Ii] TOWNSHIP • PT L"' ~ SECTION gj QTR -TWP 1:19,842 0 0.1 5 0.3 0.6 mi I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ' I 0 0.275 0.55 1.1 km Source : Esrl Dl9taG b be, GeoEye, Earthstar Geogre phcs, CNES/Alrbus cs . USD A, USGS, AEX, Gelmappirg, A erog~d. lG N. IGP, swlsstopo, end May 12, 2015 All SalmonScape Species Figure 4 WDFW Map 1 ___ 1g 1:9,028 0 0.075 0.15 0.3 mi I I I I I I I I I I 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 km l.5GSt,IHD Source: Esr( Digtal3bbe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geogai:ncs. CNES/Airbus CS, USDA, LSGS, AEX. Get.napping, Aero grid, IGN, IG P, swlsstopo, and the GIS user conmurity WOFW I . i \ \\ \ ~\ l ( j ' \ \ \. \ V ·1 N \ •,.\ \ \ '· ·r l ,, EU:VATIO:'i' ~ Cooto11n, 40' inlcrnl STR LOIS ,,,..,V Stre&mW1tcr T ypcS.F,N .... .>"·.':!.....,.. U, unknO\\.ll ... ~,x • X, non•typ<d p<r WAC 2 22-16 Water T:,pc Chau JC TllA.'ISPORTATION ~ PaviedROC1d \ L, ~ Uap.--.d Ro ad I Surbce Ualcao""' ~ Abandoned Road (not oc Aaiviry c ,p) ~ Orpbnncd Road Caotm Amnr}' 1m1_p) ;,"'"'. Trail ~ R,,;J,o.,d WAITR BODil:S lilifilll Opcu w.,.,, 1111 f latJ/Gravcl B:in 1111 1 .. 11!11 Man Made Fc.11tun: :~~-f Wet Are3 ) r ( \. ? ? ? ? Uuknown/Uc.cluii.6.cd 1\'IT!At'"DS -ltnoam f W!kJ IIRf Nam oaJr !:::: Type A r: ~= Fomtcd ::: :: T>l).e B HABITAT TECHNOLOGIES Figure 5 WDNR Mapping ~1gure 6 King County rv,apping rhe i'lfonnation rlclidtd on thlll map has been comphd bJ Krlg County alarf from I wrlety oflouroes and ii subject t o change wlhout notlat. Kl'lg County maku no repr•entatlona or wana,ties, express orlmpled, • to ao:uraey,comp•l•n••. tini,liiess, or rt,hts to U. use or such lnfonn1ti01. T tia d:Jcumentis rot Intended br use as a turv,y product ~ng County sha'I n:>t be liable fa any g e neral, apecial, ndin,tt, inddenta~ or o:insequentlaldam1gn lnduding, bu1 net li rrited to, bst revenues or bst profliil re,uting from the us, or misuse dthe Information cmtafned onthia map. Any sale of tHs map orlnfonnaticn on this map is prohiDted except by writen pennlsslcn of Kirg County. Da te: 5/1 2/2015 King County 0 in : 376 fe et N 0.04 0.08 Miles A ~ King County GISCENTER HABITAT TECHNOLOGIES . ' r (J~ t Figure 7 City of Renton Steep Slopes {' JJ ~ C REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND LITERATURE LIST Adamus, P.R., E.J. Clairain Jr., R.D. Smith, and R.E. Young. 1987. Wetland Evaluation Technique (WET); Volume II: Methodology, Operational Draft Technical Report Y-87, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. Office of Biological Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, FWS/OBS-79/31. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual," Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss. Hitchcock, C.L., A. Cronquist. 1977. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press. Seattle, Washington. Hruby, T. 2004. Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington. Revised, Washington State Depart'.11ent of Ecology Publication #04-06-025. Reppert, R.T., W. Sigleo, E. Stakhiv, L. Messman, and C. Meyers. 1979. Wetland Values -Concepts and Methods for Wetland Evaluation. Research Report 79-R1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources, Fort Belvoir, Virginia. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2008. Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region, ed. J.S. Wakeley, R.W. Lichvar, and C.V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-08-13. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soils Conservation Service. Soils Survey of King County Area Washington, February 1979. Washington State Department of Ecology. 1997. Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. Publication Number 96-94. Washington State Department of Fisheries, Catalog of Washington Streams and Salmon Utilization, Volume 1., 1 9 15061 APPENDIX A-FIELD DATA WORKSHEETS 10 15061 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region .---,. Projecl/Site: Parcels 0087000285 and 0087000293 City/County: City of Renton Sampling Date:5 MAY 2015 ApplicanUOwner: ---------------------------State: ~W~A~·----Sampling Point ~s~P~-8~1~-- lnvestigator(s): Habitat Technologies Section, Township, Range: ~s~o7~T~2=2~N~R,,3ecE~-------- Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):-------------Local relief (concave, convex, none):--------Slope(%): __ _ Subregion (LRR): A Lat: __________ Long: Datum: ____ _ Soi! Map Unit Name: A!derwood Gravelly Sandy Loam NWI classification:---------- Are climatic/ hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ~ No D (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation __ , Soil __ , or Hydrology __ significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation __ , Soil __ , or Hydrology __ naturally problematic? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes [8J No D (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YesO No 18] Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soi! Present? Yes D No 18] within a Wetland? YesD No 18] Wetland Hydrology Present? YesD No 18] Remarks: mixed upland forest on vacant lot VEGETATION -Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius) % Cover Sgecies? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. ---That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) 2. Pseudotsuga menziesii 80 :x:es FACU Total Number of Dominant 3. ---Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 4. ---Percent of Dominant Species 80% = Total Cover Tnat Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0% (NB) Sa12ling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ftradius) 1. Rubus 1:1rocera 60 ::i:es FACU Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Holodiscus discolor 20 ::i:es FACU Total% Cover of: Mu1U1:1r::i: b:x:: 3. Oemleria cerasiformis 5 no FACU OBL species x1= 4. ---FACW species x2= 5. ---FAG species x3= 75% = Total Cover FACU species x4= Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius) UPL species x5= 1. P!eridium aguilium <10 no FACU Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. --- 3. Prevalence Index =BIA= --- 4. Hydrophytlc Vegetation Indicators: --- 5. D Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation --- 6. 0 Dominance Test is >50% --- 7. D Prevalence Index is ::s3.0 1 --- B. D Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting ---data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. ---D Wetland Non-Vascular Plants 1 10. ---D Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 11. ---11ndicators of hydric soi! and wetland hydrology must = Tota! Cover Wood:x: Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius) be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 1. ---Hydrophytic 2. ---Vegetation = Total Cover Present? YesD No GJ % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: mixed upland forest US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast-Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point· SP 81 - Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confinn th~ absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) ~ Color {moist) ~ mL -1.Q.L Texture Remarks --------- 0-18 10YR 3/3 l1Q___ ------gravel!)£ sand~ loam --------- --------- --------- ------ --------- ------ 1T"ne: C=Concentration, D=Deofetion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS-Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Linina, M-Matrix. Hydrlc Soll Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematlc Hydric Soils3 : D Histosol (A 1) D Sandy Redox (S5) D 2cmMuck(A10) D Histic Epipedon (A2) D Stripped Matrix (S~) D Red Parent Material (TF2) D Black Histic {A3) D Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) D Very Shallow Dark Surface {TF12) D Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) D Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) D Other (Explain in Remarks) D Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) D Depleted Matrix (F3) D Thick Dark Surface (A 12) D Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3 lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and D Sandy Mucky Mineral {S1) D Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, D Sandy GJeyed Matrix (S4) D Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (lf present): Type; Depth (inches): Hydrlc Soll Present? YesD No 181 Remarks: appears to drain moderately we!I following seasonal storm events HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Prima[Y Indicators (minimum of one reguired· check all that ai;iQll'.l Seconda[Y Indicators (2 or more reguired} D Surface Water {A1) D Water-Stained Leaves (89) (except MLRA D Water-Stained Leaves (89) (MLRA 1, 2, D High Water Table (A2) 1, 2, 4A, and 48) 4A, and 48) D Saturation (A3) D Salt Crust (B 11) D Drainage Patterns (810) D Water Marks (81) D Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) D Dry-Season Water Table (C2) D Sediment Deposits (B2) D Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) D Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) D Drift Deposits (B3) D Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) D Geomorphic Position (D2) D Algal Mat or Crust (B4) D Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) D Shallow Aquitard (D3) D Iron Deposits (85) D Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) D FAG-Neutral Test (D5) D Surface Soil Cracks (B6) D Stunted or Stressed Plants (01) (LRR A) D Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) D Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) D other (Explain in Remarks) D Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) D Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? YesD No 181 Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YesD No 181 Depth (inches): Saturation Present? YesD No 181 Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? YesD No 181 (includes capillary frinae) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: appears to drain moderately well following seasonal storm events. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast-Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region ~ ProjecVSile: Parcels 0087000285 and 0087000293 City/County: City of Renton Sampling Date:5 MAY 2015 ApplicanVOwner: ---------------------------State: ,W~A~.~---Sampling Point: ~s~P.a-Be,3c_ __ lnvestigator(s): Habitat Technologies Section, Township, Range: "S~0~7~T~2~2~N=R~3~E ________ _ Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): _____________ Local relief (concave, convex:, none): ________ Slope{%): __ _ Subregion (LRR): ~A~-------------Lat----------Long: Datum: ____ _ Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam NWI classification: ---------- Are climatic/ hydrologic conditions on the-site typical for this time of year? Yes [8] No D (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation __ , Soil __ , or Hydrology __ significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation __ , Soil __ , or Hydrology __ naturally problematic? Ale "Normal Circumstancesn present? Yes [8J No D (If needed, ex:plain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soi! Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes D No 181 Yes D No 181 Yes D No 181 Remarks: mixed upland forest on vacant lot VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius) % Cover 1. Acer macro12hy!!um 100 2. Pseudotsuga menziesii <10 3. 4. 100% Sa121ing/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius) 1. Rubus 12rocera 40 2. Ho!odiscus discolor <5 3. Oemleria cerasiformis 10 ' 4. Corylus cornu!a 20 5. SymghoricarQUS a!bus 60 100% Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius) 1. Pteridium aguilium 20 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius) 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: mixed upland forest US Army Corps of Engineers Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes D No 181 Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: S12ecies? Status Number of Dominant Species yes FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) no FACU Tota! Number of Dominant ---Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) ---Percent of Dominant Species = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0% (A/B) yes FACU Prevalence Index worksheet: no FACU Total % Cover of: Mu!ti1;1ly by: no FACU OBL species X 1 = yes FACU FACW species x2= yes FACU FAC species x3= = Total Cover FACU species x4= UPL species x5= yes FACU Column Totals: (A) (B) --- Prevalence Index = BIA= --- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: --- D Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation --- 181 Dominance Test is >50% --- D Prevalence Index is s3.0 1 --- D Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting ---data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ---D Wetland Non-Vascular Plants 1 ---D Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) ---1lndicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must = Total Cover be present, unless disturbed or problematic. ---Hydrophytic ---Vegetation = Total Cover Present? Yes D No iSl Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast-Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: SP-B3 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color {moist} ~ Color (moist) ___Th_ .illliL. -12L Texture Remarks 0-5 1DYR 3/2 l1Q___ ------gravelly sandy loam 5-18 1DYR 313 l1Q___ none ------gravelly sandy loam --------- --------- ------ ------ ------ ------ 1Tvne; C=Concentration, D=Oepletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Llnina, M=Matrix. Hydrlc Soll Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.} Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Solls3 : D Histosol (A 1) D Sandy Redox (S5) D 2 cm Muck (A10) D Histic Epipedon (A2) 0 Stripped Matrix (S6) D Red Parent Material (TF2) D Black Histic (A3) 0 Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) D Very Shallow Dark Surface {TF12) D Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) D Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) D Other (Explain in Remarks) D Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) D Depleted Matrix (F3) D Thick Dark Surface (A12) D Redox Dark Surlace (F6) 3 1ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1} D Depleted Dark. Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, D Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) D Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (If present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes D No0 Remarks: appears to drain moderately well following seasonal storm events HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primai:y Indicators (minimum of one reguired· check all that aQgly} Secondaei: Indicators (2 or more reguired} D Suliace Water (A1) D Water-Stained Leaves (89) (except MLRA D Water-Stained Leaves (89) (MLRA 1, 2, D High Water Table (A2) 1, 2, 4A, and 48) 4A, and 48) D Saturation (A3) D Salt Crust (811) D Drainage Patterns (810) D Water Marks (81) D Aquatic Invertebrates (813) D Dry-Season Water Table (C2) D Sediment Deposits (82) D Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) D Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) D Drift Deposits (83) D Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) D Geomorphic Position (D2) D Algal Mat or Crust (84) D Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) D Shallow Aquitard (D3) D Iron Deposits (B5) D Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) D FAG-Neutral Test {05) D Surface Soil Cracks (B6) D Stunted or Stressed Plants {01) (LRR A) D Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) D Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) D Other (Explain in Remarks) D Frost-Heave Hummocks {D7) D Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Suliace Water Present? YesD No0 Depth (inches): Water Table Present? YesD No0 Depth (inches): Saturation Present? YesD No0 Depth (inches); Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes D Nol:3J (includes caoillarv frinQe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), If available: Remarks: appears to drain moderately well following seasonal storm events. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast -Version 2.0 PHOTOS 11 15061 View of the roadside ditch adjacent to SE 172" Street along the southern boundary of the project site. 12 15061 Renton Special Care I munity 17033 1081" Avenue SE Renton, WA 98157 Site Plan & Conditional Use Submittal Materials 31. Geotechnical Report lntertek Renton Special Care Community, LLC 2731 TT"' Avenue SE, Suite 203 Mercer Island, WA 98040 ATTENTION: Mr. Bill Moore billmoore@roundlakellc.com SUBJECT: Infiltration Testing Letter Report Renton Special Care Community 17033 -108th Avenue SE Renton, Washington PSI Report No. 07121316 Dear Mr. Moore, 20508 561h Avenue Wesr, Suite A Lynnwood, Washington 98036 Phone· 425-409-2504 FtD:: 425-582-8193 fntertek. com/building Psiusa.com January 6, 2017 Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) is pleased to submit this addendum letter to PSl's geotechnical site evaluation letter entitled "Site Investigation and Analysis of Previous Geotechnical Report, Renton Special Care Community, 17033 -108th Avenue SE, Renton, Washington" dated November 2, 2016. This addendum letter summarizes the additional work accomplished and provides estimated infiltration rates for the potential infiltration system located along the northern and western edges of the site. PSI performed the requested services in general accordance with our revised proposal agreement dated September 29, 2016 and our change order issued on December 9, 2016. For site-specific information, other than that which is related to the infiltration testing conducted on December 19th and 20 1h, 2016, please refer to our November 2, 2016 letter report. Conclusions and recommendations presented in the original geotechnical evaluation letter remain valid unless superseded by this addendum letter. SITE CONDITIONS The site is mostly wooded with a single family home on the north side of the site. A filled in ground swimming pool is located in the backyard area along with a concrete pad and an old dilapidated shed. Our review of the provided topographic profile shows the site slopes down from the northeast to the southwest from an elevation of approximately EL 415 feet to EL 400 feet above the mean sea level, over a distance of approximately 350 feet. The highest elevations are along the northeastern portion of the site and the lowest in the southwestern portion of the site. Based on a review of the geology of the region utilizing the Washington Department of Natural Recourses Interactive Geologic Map, and our geotechnical investigation of the site, PSI observed that this area is underlain by glacial till. Glacial till generally consists of silts, sands and gravels that have been overridden by a continental glacier. Renton Special Care Community /nfiltrat1ot1 Testing 17033 -J08 11r Avenue, Renton, Washington PSI Project No 07121465 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Professional Service Industries, Inc. Engineering• Consulting • Testing January 6, 2017 Page 2 o/4 Subsurface explorations for the infiltration tests were conducted on December 19'", 2016 with 4 borings drilled with a limited access rig using hollow stem auger drilling techniques. These borings were designated as IT-1 through IT-4. Each borings was drilled to a depth ranging from 3 to 4 feet below existing ground surface (bgs). PSI collected samples of soil from the base on each infiltration test location. Each soil boring terminated in silty sand soils consistent with the previously observed glacial till soils noted in our previous report (see attached sieve data). The approximate locations of the soil borings and infiltration tests are shown on Figure 1. Logs of the subsurface explorations and laboratory testing results for this study are included in the attachments. FIELD INFILTRATION TESTING PSI performed four infiltration tests in this investigation. These infiltration tests were conducted at the maximum depths of the borings; (3 to 4 feet bgs), groundwater was not encountered at these locations. Based on readily available well logs listed with the Washington State Department of Ecology and our recent site investigation, groundwater is not anticipated within the upper 50 feet of the existing site grades, however, rainfall and other factors could lead to perched levels in the upper subsurface areas. Infiltration tests were conducted in each of these borings within the 6 inch inside diameter Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) pipe. The pipe was placed in firm contact with undisturbed soil and backfilled with onsite soils around the perimeter. Approximately 2 inches of washed pea gravel was placed in the base of the pipe and loosely tamped into place prior to testing. PSI added water to each test location and noted that slow percolation rates were occurring. Approximately 6 inches of water was added into each tested pipe, above the pea gravel, with minor amount of water added periodically to maintain water levels in the borings. The borings were left over night to hydrate for at least 16 hours. The next day PSI observed that water still remained in each test pipe, but water was added to increase the water levels to approximately six inches in the test holes. Readings were collected over the next four hours until a stabilized rate was observed at each location for at least three consecutive readings. The measured Infiltration rates ranged from approximately 0.10 to 0.22 inches per hour. The infiltration rates listed in this report are measured field infiltration rates and do not have a factor of safety applied to them. Infiltration rates are indicative of the soils at the specific location, depth and time in which they were conducted. Variations of any of these factors may alter the observed infiltration rates. Infiltration rates measured during our field investigation are shown in Table 1 below. Renron Special Care Community [nfiltration Testing 17033-]081h Avenue, Retiton, Washingtoti PSI Project No 07121465 Professional Service Industries, Inc. Engineering• Consulting• Testing January 6, 2017 Page3of4 Table 1: Summary of Measured Infiltration Rates, and Soil Test Results Infiltration Infiltration Latitude Longitude Cation Organic ID Rate (in./hr) Exchange Content IT-1 0.20 47.44934 -122.19798 2.58 1.7% IT-2 0.11 47.44927 -122.19770 4.06 1.1% IT-3 0.22 47.44926 -122.19751 3.46 1.8% IT-4 0.10 47.44901 -122.19803 6.19 1.6% Based on the King County Surface Water Design Manual infiltration systems should be designed based on the following equation: !design = lmeasured X Ftesting X Fgeometry X Fplugging !design = Design infiltration rate !measured = Field Measured Rate Ftesting = Testing coefficient, which for the type of testing we performed will be 0.3. F9eometry = width of the infiltration gallery relative to the depth of groundwater below the infiltration system calculated by: Feeometry = 4*0/W + 0.05, Where D = depth of groundwater below the infiltration system and W = width of the infiltration system. Based on measured water levels near the site being greater than 50 feet, PSI recommends using 50 feet for the depth to groundwater. F9eometry must be no less than 0.25 and no greater than 1.0. Determining the actual groundwater elevation at the site may improve the accuracy of maximum high annual groundwater elevation but will likely not significantly affect the design infiltration rate. Fp1ugging = plugging factor which varies depending on the subsurface soil type. For this site it will be taken to be 0.8, which is recommended for loamy sand (silty sand). Infiltration rates used in design of any infiltration gallery should be determined based on the above calculations. Based on the current information provided by LDC design criteria and rates are summarized in the table below. Renton Special Care Community Infiltration Testmg 17033 -108'h Avenue, Renton, Washington PSI Project No 07121465 Table 2: Design Rate and Calculation Factors Infiltration Proposed Width Depth to ID of Infiltration Groundwater Ftesting Gallery {Feet) (feet) fgeomerv IT-1 0.3 20 50 1 IT-2 0.3 16 50 1 IT-3 0.3 9 50 1 IT-4 0.3 9 50 1 Professional Service Industries, Inc. Engineering • Consulting• Testing January 6, 2017 Page4of4 Design Rate fplugging (in/hr) 0.8 0.05 0.8 0.03 0.8 0.05 0.8 0.02 If you have any questions about the tests performed, or the data obtained, or require additional services please feel free to contact the undersigned. Respectfully Submitted, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Michael S. Place, P.E. Principal Consultant Stephen R. Bryant, PE Senior Vice President e-mail: michael.place@psiusa.com Phone: 425-409-2505 Attachments: Figure 1: Site Exploration Map Boring Logs IT-1 through IT-4 Sieve Results Cation Exchange Test Results SHED LIES 2.5' S. OF ?RCPERTY LINE \ \ COTTAGE,'. -~6· Ff-:: lf/0 • ~\ ', COTT,'.rif ~F .... t/10, SCT Ri'.:BAR A:'-1J C!P E~JW #44651 ---W---W--·-,W----W------w--./-':':;:._;:::.::--~---·1<-- •\nn ic:.:-YO.:~"..·~'"'-·,r<~--.~--0.1" N. 0;:- -...0"' ~ .,.\ \s ~\ .... \. o" \ \ CUR F.t-.:E ·~ SE112NDST _ ---\::::::= _ -----+------_ __L~~-p·~-------==---\----\ / --,---.-~ ;::::j_~l ---s------s ,=;p . CULVERT J f ~so--/~,"C"'~----S-ET~~R-E_B_>_.R_A_N_D_C_A~P"'"'-+--~ __ '\_ ----------~----~/~s~S_M_H H:. =102.95'! 12'" CVNC) \_ cu_LV~E~R~T~ __ ,_,._,w_L_S~#~4_4_5_5_1 ___ ~, LEGEND: ~ Infiltration Test Location lntertek r,;.;;;;J l~ 20508 56th Ave W Suite A Lynwood, WA 98036 (425) 409-2504 NOTES Site underlay provided by Magnet LDC. PROJECT NAME: Renton Special Care Community 17033 -108th Avenue SE Renton, Washington DESCRIPTION: Site Exploration Map DRAWN BY: MSP APPROVED BY: MSP DATE: FIGURE: January, 2017 1 PSI PROJECT NUMBER: 07121465 l .1 Professiona vice Industries, Inc. • 20508 56th "venue W, Suite A LOG OF IT-1 • Lynnwood, WA 98036 Telephone: (425) 409-2504 JCov· IA'";\ ~O~-R1Q~ Sheet 1 of 1 PSI Job No.: 07121465 Excavation Method:Hand Auger WATER LEVELS Project: Renton Special Care Community Sampling Method: 'Sl- Location: 17033 -108th Avenue SE DCP T)l)e: .Y. Renton, WA Boring Location: ~ DYNAMIC CONE -;; C iL PENETRATION TEST DAT A m 0 u~ Blows per ,inch@ • • ~ m 8' d ~ Ou " ,1'. 0. u u -c * 0 " ,1'. ..., >, z C ~ Q)"T I ' >-= ·a C" ii C u • • MATERIAL DESCRIPTION • 0 • X r;;i PL Additional 0 "' :c 0. ~ ro u 0. 0 Moisture ~ 15. 0. 0. E • u u. ;; • LL Remarks ~ • ~ E m > (/) .E ~ ·a 0 ,s ~ m 0 " 0 CJ (/) (/) u (.) m-' w • (/) C aJ 0: ::, >, STRENGTH, tsf 0 " Qu * Qp 0 0 ,.o ,.o ?'Y .... ~ TOPSOIL: Moist, brown silty Sand with gravel and ~-.. ~i~;· organics. " :~11,:.) :.,.'.,.::..:, SAND with Silt: Moist, red-brown, trace gravel. -1 ::: ( .• .. -•• :.{/ SM .. 2 ···:::,: ···:::-: -:·. ~-i:;:_·~·: Silty SAND: Moist, light brown. (Till) SM f-3 . i-:,:C. ci: Bottom at Boring at 3 feet. No groundwater observed . . Completion Depth: 3.0 ft Sample Types: Latitude: 47.44927° Date Boring Started: 12/19/16 I Shelby Tube Longitude: -122.19751Q Date Boring Completed: 12/19/16 Excavation Equipment Logged By; MSP Dynamic Cone (DCP) Remarks: Excavation Contractor: PSI, Inc. Grab Sample The strat1ficat1on hnes represent approXJmate boundaries. The trans1t1on may be gradual. l .1 Professiona vice Industries, Inc. • 20508 56th, ,,_nue W, Suite A LOG OF IT-2 • Lynnwood, WA 98036 Telephone: (425) 409-2504 Sheet 1 of 1 c-·-'A~~\ ~;,~_Q1Q~ PSI Job No.: 07121465 Excavation Method:Hand Auger WATER LEVELS Project: Renton Special Care Community Sampling Method: 'l. Location: 17033 -108th Avenue SE DCP Type: :?: Renton, WA Boring Location: "I_ DYNAJv\l(.; CONE "' C iL PENETRATION TEST DATA 'if w .Q u~ Blom per-inch@ 'if 8' w ci ~ " Ou " ,!!'.. 0. u u -c ,;, 0 " ,!!'.. ..., ~ z C ~ CU "T I u w -=-MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ·a c-e,: C .'.!! • om X Ill PL Additional 0 £ E a. "' • u 0. a Moisture :g C. 0. 0. E w u u• " • LL Remarks ~ w ~ E m 6 u, s! ·o 0 " ' m " 0 CJ "' (f) u u m-I I ' w w u, c<D a: ::, ~ STRENGTH, tsf 0 " o, * Qp 0 ,.o ,.o 0 /\·~ TOPSOIL: Moist, brown silty Sand with gravel and ii·/'.;' organics. " -W.i:: .-+ SAND with Silt: Moist, red-brown, trace gravel. . ·· ... ·. a 1 -:.: \' SM · . .-.... , .. .. .. " -~ ~~: Silty SAND: Moist, light brown. (Till) •.,· .. -2 - .. ,· '•.', . :. . · .. SM a -._:_ ~--·.· .• . .. .. . • :_:_\ .. .. " 3 -i:.:.~G· Bottom of Boring at 3 feet. No groundwater observed. Completion Depth: 3.0 ft Sample Types: Latitude: 47 .44927° Date Boring Started: 12/19/16 I Shelby Tube Longitude: -122.19751 ° Date Boring Completed: 12/19/16 Excavation Equipment: Logged By: MSP Dy,,amic Cone (DCP) Remarks: Excavation Contractor: PSI, Inc. Grab Sample The strat1ficat1on lines represent approXJmate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. l •t Professiona -vice Industries, Inc. • 20508 56th Avenue W, Suite A LOG OF IT-3 • Lynnwood, WA 98036 Telephone: (425) 409-2504 Sheet 1 of 1 Fov· IA?~\ ~~?-81 a~ PSI Job No.: 07121465 Excavation Method:Hand Auger WATER LEVELS Project: Renton Special Care Community Sampling MethOO: 5l Location: 17033 -1 08th Avenue SE DCP Type: .Y. Renton, WA Boring Location: :!. DYNAMIC CONE -;;, C 0: PENETRATION TEST DAT A ~ 0 u~ Blows per -inch@ ~ • • iii Oo 8' 0. 0 ~ 0 -c ;;, 0 " ~ ,?!, ~ z 0 ~ (l)""'j" ,?!, ..., 2. a Cc E! I I I C u • MATERIAL DESCRIPTION • 0 • "" CL Additional ~ r. E • 0. ~ ro u 0. a X Moisture 0. 0. 0. E • [j 0. .; • LL Remarks > • ~ E rn > "' ·-. '6 0 " ~ ro 8 E o " 2 0 ('.) if) u ~in ' UJ if) • "' 0: :, ~ STRENGTH, tsf 0 " a, * Op 0 0 co ,.o (\-~ TOPSOIL: Moist, brown silty Sand with gravel and '/.?·'.,' organics. f--:,i ,; .. ,\ ~-..;~ •. ·. ·.· SAND with Silt: Moist, red-brown, trace gravel. '• ·:: :-: 1 SM · ..... ":"."~-· Silty SAND: Moist, light brown. (Till) .. ·:: ·• · . . . -2 -:_: : SM : ',•' -·. :.:.: . .-:· C 3 -~ ·_.:_ Bottom of Boring at 3 feet. No groundwater observed. Completion Depth: 3.0 ft Sample Types: Latitude: 47.44927° Date Boring Started: 12/19116 ! Shelby fobe Longitude: -122.19751 ° Date Boring Completed: 12/19116 Excavation Equipment: Logged By: MSP Dynamic Cone (DCP) Remarks: Excavation Contractor: PSI, Inc. Grab Sample The strat1ficat1on lines represent apprmomate OOundanes. The trans1t1on may be gradual. t .1 Profession, rvice Industries, Inc. • 20508 56th Avenue W, Suite A LOG OF IT-4 • Lynnwood, WA 98036 Telephone: (425) 409-2504 Sheet 1 of 1 C:ov· /42';\ &aQ0_R10~ PSI Job No.: 07121465 Excavation MethoctHand Auger WATER LEVELS Project: Renton Special Care Community Sampling Method: :-l- Location: 17033 -108th Avenue SE DCPType: y Renton, WA Boring Location: ~ DYNAMIC CONE • C iL PENETRATION TEST DATA ~ ~ u~ Blows per -inch@ ~ • Oo ;; §" d ~ " ' ,!!!, 0 0 -c '# " ,!!!, >, z C ~ <ll"T I I I f-= C" 1i C 0 • • MATERIAL DESCRIPTION • 0. X "" el Additional 0 .c E 15. c ro un. 3 Moisture ~ 15. n. a. E • u 0. • • LL Remarks ro ~ E > .E ~ " . > • ro "' 0 " • 0 0 ro (.I) 0 u ~00 ::, [jJ (.I) 0 • "' "' ::, >, STRENGTH, tsf 0 .. Ou * Op 0 0 '" '·" ?''r:· -~ Forest Duff: ~··/'.;· " :~J(.~ ~:y,}:- ·~' i; \1 1 ~~:.: SAND with Silt: Moist, red-brown, trace gravel. .. -_.:_: . . · "• .. ". '• . ;· ... 2 . ,' :-; SM ', ;· .::: ···:·.· -.. _.-_ :·. . " ·. :-:- >-3 -;~~ ',• Silty SAND: Moist, light brown. (Till) -:· ::: .... ' .. " SM . ,, :-: 4 ··i:.:..·..:...:. Bottom at Boring at 4 feet. No groundwater observed. Completion Depth: 4.0 ft Sample Types: Latitude: 47.4492r Date Boring Started: 12/19/16 I ShelbyTube Longitude: -122.19751 ° Date Boring Completed: 12/19/16 Excavation Equipment: Logged By: MSP Dynamic Cone (DCP) Remarks: Excavation Cwtractor: PSI, Inc. Grab Sample .. The strat1ficat1on lines represent approximate boundanes. The transrtion may be gradual. ,-r <!J w ;: /;; "' z vi ~ ,-z tJ ~ w ~ lntertek Project Name Project Number PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS -C117/C136 RSCC Project Location ___ __.:_R.:.:ec..:nt.:.:oc..:n ___ _ Renton Tested By Sean Schlitt ---~~~~--- Date of Sampling 12/19/2016 Date ofTesting 1/312017 Reviewed By MSP 3" 2" 15" 1" 3/4" I 1 I [ #3/8 #4 #10 #20 #200 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 I.... -.. ----------------- 35 ---------------- 30 25 _j_, -----------·----------------' 20 ----1---- 15 10 ' - 5 . .. '-.. ............. . 100.00 10.00 1.00 0.10 0.01 . ---··-· ---· . --·-· -·-PARTICLE SIZE IN MILLIMETERS . . . -- Coarse I Fine Coarse I Coarse Fine Silt/Clay Gravel Sand Fine Grained Boring# Depth (ft) % Gravel %Sand % Fines PL LL Pl Moisture (%) IT-4 4' 7.0% 45.3% 47.7% NP NP NP 22.2% IT-1 3' 8.2% 46.6% 45.1% NP NP NP 26.2% IT-2 3' 12.6% 43.7% 43.7% NP NP NP 15.2% IT-3 3' 13.6% 36.8% 49.6% NP NP NP 16.0% Plot Boring# Depth (ft) uses Symbol uses Name Lines IT-4 4' SM Siltv SAND ...... IT-1 3' SM Siltv SAND -IT-2 3' SM Siltv SAND ""*"' IT-3 3' SM Siltv SAND ...... lntertek-PSI Office: 20508 -56th Avenue West, Lynnwood, WA, 98036, Office Phone 425-409-2504, Fax 425-582-8193 Professional Service Industries, Inc. Michael Place 24113 56th Avenue W Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043 RE: RSCC Work Order Number: 1612204 December 22, 2016 Attention Michael Place: Fremont ~rm1£11Uil',JII 3600 Fremont Ave. N. Seattle, WA 98103 T: (206) 352-3790 F: (206) 352-7178 info@fremontanalytical.com Fremont Analytical, Inc. received 4 sample(s) on 12119/2016 for the analyses presented in the following report. Cation Exchange Capacity This report consists of the following: -Case Narrative -Analytical Results -Applicable Quality Control Summary Reports -Chain of Custody All analyses were performed consistent with the Quality Assurance program of Fremont Analytical, Inc. Please contact the laboratory if you should have any questions about the results. Thank you for using Fremont Analytical. Sincerely, Mike Ridgeway Laboratory Director DoDIELAP Certification #L2371, !SOI/EC 170252005 ORELAP Certification: WA 100009-007 (NELAP Recognized) Original www.fremontanalytical.com Page 1 of 9 CLIENT: Project: Professional Service Industries, Inc. RSCC Work Order: 1612204 Lab Sample ID 1612204-001 1612204-002 1612204-003 1612204-004 Client Sample ID IT-1 IT-2 IT-3 IT-4 Date: 12122/2016 Work Order Sample Summary Date/Time Collected 12/19/201610:05 AM 12/19/2016 10:25 AM 12/19/2016 10:50 AM 12/19/201611:15 AM Date/Time Received 12/19/20161:02 PM 12/19/2016 1 :02 PM 12/19/20161:02 PM 12/19/20161:02 PM Original Note: If no "Time Collected" is supplied, a default of 12:00AM is assigned Page 2 of 9 Case Narrative CLIENT: Project: Professional Service Industries, Inc. RSCC WorkOrder Narrative: I. SAMPLE RECEIPT: Samples receipt information is recorded on the attached Sample Receipt Checklist. II. GENERAL REPORTING COMMENTS: WO#: 1612204 Date 12/22/2016 Results are reported on a wet weight basis unless dry-weight correction is denoted in the units field on the analytical report ("mg/kg-dry" or "ug/kg-dry"). The validity of the analytical procedures for which data is reported in this analytical report is determined by the Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) and the Method Blank (MB). The LCS and the MB are processed with the samples to ensure method criteria are achieved throughout the entire analytical process. Ill. ANALYSES AND EXCEPTIONS: Exceptions associated with this report will be footnoted in the analytical results page(s) or the quality control summary page(s) and/or noted below. Original Page 3 of 9 Qualifiers & Acronyms WO#: 1612204 Date Reported: 12/2212016 Qualifiers: • -Flagged value is not within established control limits B -Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank D -Dilution was required E -Value above quantitation range H -Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded I -Analyte with an internal standard that does not meet established acceptance criteria J -Analyte detected below Reporting Limit N -Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) Q -Analyte with an initial or continuing calibration that does not meet established acceptance criteria (<20%RSD, <20% Drift or minimum RRF) S -Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limits ND -Not detected at the Reporting Limit R -High relative percent difference observed Acronyms: %Rec -Percent Recovery CCB -Continued Calibration Blank CCV -Continued Calibration Verification DF -Dilution Factor HEM -Hexane Extractable Material ICV -Initial Calibration Verification LCS/LCSD -Laboratory Control Sample/ Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate MB or MBLANK -Method Blank MDL -Method Detection Limit MS/MSD -Matrix Spike/ Matrix Spike Duplicate PDS -Post Digestion Spike Ref Val -Reference Value RL -Reporting Limit RPO -Relative Percent Difference SD -Serial Dilution SGT -Silica Gel Treatment SPK-Spike Surr -Surrogate Original www.fremontanalytical.com Page 4 of 9 Fremont ~ liTT1 IJJililU I CLIENT: Professional Service Industries, Inc. Project: RSCC Lab ID: 1612204-001 Client Sample ID: IT-1 Analyses Cation Exchange Capacity Cation Exchange Capacity Lab ID: 1612204-002 Client Sample ID: IT-2 Analyses Cation Exchange Capacity Cation Exchange Capacity Lab ID: 1612204-003 Client Sample ID: IT-3 Analyses Cation Exchange Capacity Cation Exchange Capacity Original Result 2.58 Result 4.06 Result 3.46 RL Qual 1.00 RL Qual 1.00 RL Qual 1.00 Analytical Report Work Order: 1612204 Date Reported: 12/22/2016 Collection Date: 12/19/2016 10:05:00 AM Matrix: Soil Units DF Date Analyzed Batch ID: R33550 Analyst: TN meq/10Dg 12/22/201612:21:54 PM Collection Date: 12/19/2016 10:25:00 AM Matrix: Soil Units DF Date Analyzed Batch ID: R33550 Analyst: TN meq/1 DOg 1212212016 12:25:30 PM Collection Date: 12/19/201610:50:00 AM Matrix: Soil Units DF Date Analyzed Batch ID: R33550 Analyst: TN meq/100g 12/22/201612:39:55 PM Page 5 of 9 Fremont ~ rm7 ffliiM, I I CLIENT: Professional Service Industries, Inc. Project: RSCC Lab ID: 1612204-004 Client Sample ID: IT-4 Analyses Cation Exchange Capacity Cation Exchange Capacity Original Result 6.19 RL Qual 1.00 Analytical Report Work Order: 1612204 Date Reported: 1212212016 Collection Date: 12/19/2016 11 :15:00 AM Matrix: Soil Units DF Date Analyzed Batch ID: R33550 Analyst: TN meq/100g 12/22/201612:43:31 PM Page 6 of 9 Work Order: 1612204 CLIENT: Project: Professional Service Industries, Inc. RSCC Sample ID MB-R33550 Client ID MBLKS Analyte Cation Exchange Capacity Sample ID LCS-R33550 Client ID LCSS Analyte Sodium Sample ID 1612204-002ADUP Client ID IT-2 Analyte Cation Exchange Capacity Original SampType· MBLK Batch ID: R33550 Result ND SampType LCS Batch 10· R33550 Result 934 SampType· DUP Batch ID R33550 Result 426 RL 1.00 RL 100 RL 1.00 Date: 12/2212016 QC SUMMARY REPORT Cation Exchange Capacity Units· meq/100g Prep Date· 12/22/2016 Analysis Date: 12/22/2016 SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowl1m1t High limit RPO Ref Val Units: 1,1g/L Prep Date 121221201& Analysis Date· 12/22/2016 SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowllm1t H1ghllm1t RPO Ref Val 1,000 0 93.4 75 125 Units· meq/100g Prep Dale: 121221201& Analysis Dale' 12122/2016 SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowllrnit High Limit RPO Ref Val 4 060 RunNo: 33550 SeqNo: 636569 %RPO RPDLimit Qual RunNo 33550 SeqNo: 636570 %RPO RPDlimit Qual RunNa 33550 SeqNo: 636576 %RPO RPDLimit Qwal 4.81 30 age"TC>f"9 Fremont ~ rrm IJJllilU I Sample Log-In Check List Client Name: PSI Logged by: Clare Griggs Chain of Custody 1. Is Chain of Custody complete? 2. How was the sample delivered? 3. Coolers are present? Work Order Number: 1612204 Date Received: Yes Ga Client Yes D 12/19/2016 1 :02:00 PM No D Not Present D No Ga NA D Samples received straight kom fi9ld 4. Shipping container/cooler in good condition? 5. Custody Seals present on shipping container/cooler? (Refer to comments for Custody Seals not intact) 6. Was an attempt made to cool the samples? 7. Were all items received at a temperature of >O"C to 10.0°C* 8. Sample(s) in proper container(s)? 9. Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)? 1 O. Are samples properly preserved? 11. Was preservative added to bottles? 12. Is there headspace in the VOA vials? 13. Did all samples containers arrive in good condition(unbroken)? 14. Does paperwork match bottle labels? 15. Are matrices correctly identified on Chain of Custody? 16. Is it clear what analyses were requested? 17. Were all holding times able to be met? Special Handling (if applicable/ 18. Was c!ient notified of all discrepancies with this order? Person Notified: Date Yes Ga No D Yes D No D Not Required ~ Yes D No D NA Ga Yes D No D NA Ga Yes Ga No D Yes Ga No D Yes Ga No D Yes D No Ga NA D Yes D No D Yes Ga No D Yes ~ No D Yes Ga No D Yes Ga No D Yes Ga No D Yes D No D NA Ga By Whom: Via: D eMail D Phone D Fax D In Person Regarding: Client Instructions: 19. Additional remarks: Item Information Item-~---____________ __j __ Temp _~ ----------------22.9 _ _J * Note: DoD/ELAP and TNI require items to be received at 4°C +/-2°C Original Page 8 of 9 IIFre'!l~~ Chain of Custody Record and Laboratory Services Agreement oa,., 1.2--1 '1-( G _.,.,,.,.1«t,,.11.mna11, \\O \'2..%01= ~ 3600 Fremont Ave N. Seattle# WA 98103 Tel: 206-352-319(1 Fax: 206-352-7:1.78 Pro;ect Name: P•ae: Df: ---- tree Client: I,..\ Project No: f "" f o., , l..v 4 Collected by: ,MJC4ed p(q < ~ Address: LDcatlon: Oty, State, Zip: Telephone: Fax: ~' ~(£ ReponTo(PM): lelttio ,-, ·~'cltqe/.~ @Pi,' vs«. rf'Nf PM Email: "MatriJC Codes: A .. Air, AQ= Aqueous, B= Bulk, O • other, P = Product, S • Soll, SD"' Sediment, SL =SOlld, W., Water, OW• Drinking Water, GW.,. Ground Water, SW:. Storm Water, WW• Waste Water Sample Name . n-1 , IT -2 , IT-3 • I T_-1 IS 6 7 • 9 10 Sample Date /).-( t( <.I, sample Time ro:ot; lo:),;- Io• i;v II : /5 5.!imple Type (Matrb:)~ ~ .. : ( \ '§'"- ~ ,.,,. .,. ;c1c; ¢%~+ Q,~r;. Comments rx l:X IX IX ··Metals Analysis (Circle): MTCA-5 RCRA-8 Priority Pollutanu TAL lndMdual: Ag Al At B Ba Be Ca Cd Co Cr Cu Fe Ht: K Mg Mn M1> Na NI Pb Sb Sr, Sr Sn Tl TI U V Zn , .. Antons (Orde); Nitrate Nitrite Bromide O-Phosph;ate fluoride Nltratei-Nltrtte Turn·aroond tlrn.es for samples 1-----'---'----------.S,,'°""',O,=====-,,-:::,::=cc,=c:.==="""========:::-'""c:-:=:.:::-lreu,ived after 4:00pm ~II begin CJ Return to CHe-nt · Disposal Lab samples will be hll!ld ot 30 days unless otherwise noted. A fee may be on the following business day. .anessed if samples ate re_!a_i11_rd af\ft\"30 days.) stmPI« Pil99Yli I npreuat that I am aulhoriud to enlc:r iuto ibis Agreement wllh Fremont i I on heh.air or the Clienl named above, tha11 bavr verified Client's agrttmHt to eath or1 tnns o hr front and back.,ideortbls Agrttm t. • : 01\ ~ (, r?f ··r~ \ ~152-- Special Remarir.s: - 0, Q) 0) "' n. Relinquished I, ,,,., "T Date/Time ~;,V., tr" DiM/Tlrhe \ -v (ITAT ~ Sameo:itA Nextoay" 2 Day 3 o(y STD) ' "Pk-He coonlinlte with the lab in adv;ance · Distribution: White· Lab, Y•llow. File, Pink • Originator www.fremontanalytical.com coc 1.1. 4.5.:Z.6 • 1 of 2 Geotechnic al Engin eering.~- Geology ·· Environmental Scientists" Construction \fonitoring' ' .. _ ~ l. - ;.:.~~~. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUD .... ..;-a.• . '. 'I PROPOSED -,~ . RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION :-:~.1 17033 -108th AVENUE SOUTHEAST .'t>~ RENTON, WASHINGTON •-:~ ·. -. ,, , ES-3613 ..... :. ... •it,...,.._ . • l;..._ ... ~ -. i:?· ~--~- r~, c r· r-, , r ,-.. . ' ••·I' I -/ \ ' I ,_, [__ / / __ tJ JAN 1 9 2017 PREPARED FOR MR. STEIN SKATTUM November 11, 2015 Keven D. Hoffmann, E.I.T. Project Engineer Kyle R. Campbell, P.E. Principal GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION 17033 -108TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST RENTON, WASHINGTON ES-3613 Earth Solutions NW, LLC 1805 -136th Place Northeast, Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Phone: 425-449-4704 Fax: 425-449-4711 Toll Free: 866-336-871 o Important Information About Your Geotechnical Engineering Report Subsurface problems are a onncrpar cause of construction delays. cost overruns claims and disputes • The rollowmg mformatron 1s provided to help you manage your rrsks. Geotechnical Services Are Performed lor Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs of their ciients. A geotechnical engineering study conducted for a civil engi- neer may not fulfill the needs of a construction contractor or even another civil engineer. Because each geotechnical engineering study is unique, each geotechnical engineering report is unique, prepared solely/or the client. No one except you should rely on your geotechnical engineering report without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer who prepared it. And no one ---not even you~ should apply tr,e report for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. Read the Full Report Serious problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical engineering report did not read it all. Do not rely on an executive summary. Do not read selected elements only. A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Based on A Unique Set or Project-Specific Factors Geotechnical engineers consider a number of unique, project-specific fac- tors when establishing the scope of a study. Typ;cal factors include: the client's goals, objectives, and risk management preferences; the general nature of the structure involved, its size, and configuration; the location of the structure on the site; and other planned or existing site improvements, such as access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities. Unless the geotechnical engineer who conducted the study specifically indicates oth- erwise, do not rely on a geotechnical engineering report that was: • not prepared for you, • not prepared for your project, • not prepared for the specific site explored, or • completed before important project changes were made. Typical changes that can erode the reliability of an exist:ng geotechnical engineering report include tl1ose that affect • the function of the proposed structure, as when it's changed from a parking garage to an office building, or from a light industrial plant to a refrigerated warehouse, • elevation, configuration, location, orientation, or weight of the proposed structure, • composition of the design team, or • project ownersr.ip. As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project change5-ilven minor ones-,md request an assessment of !heir impact. Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems that occur because their reports do not consider developments of which they were not informed. Subsurface Conditions can Change A geotechnical engineering report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was pertormed. Do not rely on a geotechnicai engineer- ing repo!lwhose adequacy may have been affected by: the passage of time; by man-made events, such as construction on or adjacent to the site; or by natural events, such as floods, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctua- tions. Always contact the geotechnical engineer before applying the report to determine if it is still reliable. A minor amount of additional testing or analysis could prevent major problems. Most Geotechnlcal Findings Are Professional Opinions Site exp:oration identifies subsurtace conditons only at those points where subsurtace tests are conducted or samples are taken. Geotechnical engi- neers review field and laboratory data and then apply their professional judgment to render an opinion about subsurface cuflditions throughout the site. Actual subsurface conditions may differ-sometimes significantly~ from those indicated in your report. Retaining the geotectmical engineer who developed your report to provide construction observation is the most effective method of managing the risks associated with unanticipated conditions. A Report's Recommendations Are Notfinal Do not overre:y on the construction recommendations included in your report. Those recommendations are not final, because geotechnical engi- neers develop them principally from judgment and opinion. Geotechnical engineers can finalize their recommendations only by observing actual subsurtace conditions revealed during construction. The geotechnical engineer who developed your report cannot assume responsibility or liability for the report's recommendations if that engineer does not perform construction observation. A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Subject to Misinterpretation Other design team members' misinterpretation of geotechnical engineering reports has resulted ,n costly problems. Lower that risk by having your geo- technical engineer confer with appropriate members of the design team after submitting the report. Also retain your geotechnical engineer to review perti- nent elements of the design team's plans and specifications. Contractors can also misinterpret a geotechnical engineering report. Reduce that risk by having your geotechnical engineer participate in prebid and preconstruction conferences. and by providing construction observation. Do Not Redraw the Engineer's Logs Geotechnical engineers prepare final boring and testing logs based upon their interpretation of field logs and laboratory data. To prevent errors or omissions, the logs included in a geotechnical engineering report should never be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings. Only photographic or electronic reproduction is acceptable, but recognize that separa#ng logs from the report can elevate risk. Give Contractors a Complete Report and Guidance Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can make contractors liable for unanticipated sobsurtace conditions by limiting what they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent costly problems, give con- tractors the complete geotechnical engineering report, bu/preface it wi:h a clearly written letter of transmittal In that letter, advise contractors that the report was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the report's accuracy is limited; encourage them to confer with the geotechnical engineer who prepared the report (a modest fee may be required) and/or to conduct additional study to obtain the specific types of inforrmtion they need or prefer. A prebid conference can also be valuable. Be sure contrac- tors have sufficient time to pertorm additional study. Only then might you ll€ in a position to give contractors the best information available to you, while requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. Read ResponsibUity Provisions Closely Some clients, design professionals, and contractors do not recognize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other engineering disci- plines. This lack of understanding has created unrealistic expectations that have led to disappointments. claims, and disputes. To help reduce the risk of such outcomes, geotechnical engineers commonly include a variety of explanatory provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled "limitations" many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers' responsi- bilities begin and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilities and risks. Read these provisions closely Ask questions. Your geotechnical engineer should respond fully and frankly. Geoenvironmental Concerns Are Not Covered The equipment, techniques, and personnel used to pertorm a geoenviron- mental study differ significantly from those used to pertorm a geotechnical study. For that reason, a gsotechnical engineering report does not usually relate any geoenvironmental findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Unanticipated environmental problems have led to numerous project failures. If you have not yet obtained your own geoen- vironmental information, ask your geotechnical consultant for risk man- agement guidance. Do not rely on an environmental report prepared for someone else. Obtain Professional Assistance To Deal with Mold Diverse strategies can be applied during building design, construction, operation, and maintenance to prevent significant amounts of mold from growing on indoor surtaces. To be effective, all such strategies should oe devised for the express purpose of mold prevention, integrated ,nto a com- prehensive plan, and executed witn diligent oversight by a professional mold prevention consultant. Because just a small amount of water or moisture can lead to the development of severe mold infestations, a num- ber of mold prevention strategies focus on keeping building surfaces dry. While groundwater, water infiltration, and similar issues rnay l1ave been addressed as part of the geotechnical engineering study whose findings are conveyed irHtlis report, the geotechnical engineer in charge of this project is not a mold prevention consultant; none of the services per· formed in connection with the geotechnical engineer's study were designed or conducted for the purpose of mold preven- tion. Proper implementation of the recommendations conveyed in this report will not of itself be sufficient to prevent mold from growing in or on the structure involved. Rely, on Your ASFE-Member Geotechncial Engineer lor Additional Assistance Membership in ASFE/The Best People on Earth exposes geotechnical engineers to a wide array of risk management techniques that can be of genuine benefit for everyone involved with a construction project. Confer with you ASFE-member geotechnical engineer for more information. A5FE Tiu 1111 Peoph an Eartb 8811 Colesville Road/Suite G106, Silver Spring, MD 20910 Telephone: 3011565-2733 Facsimile: 301/589-2017 e-mail: info@asle.org www.asfe.org Co/1Y(i{Jht 2004 by ASFE, fnc. Duplication, reproduction, or copying of rhis docufTl8nt, in whole or in parl, by ;my means whatsoever; is strictly prohiO/terJ, except wfffl ASFE's specific writtrm permission. Excerptin',J, quoting, or otherwise extracting wording from this document is permitted only with the express written permission of ASFE, and only tor purposes of scholarly research or book review. Only members of ASFE may use thfs document as a compfBment ro or as ar, element of a geotechnical engineering report Any other firm, individual, or other entity th2t so uses this document without being an ASFE member could be committing nea/igent or intentional (fraudulent) misreprssentation. IIGER06045.0M November 11, 2015 ES-3613 Mr. Stein Skattum P.O. Box 769 Renton, Washington 98057 Dear Mr. Skattum: Earth Solutions NW LLC • Gcotcchnical Engineering • Construction Monitoring • Environmental Sciences Earth Solutions NW, LLC (ESNW) is pleased to present this report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Residential Subdivision, 17033 -1081h Avenue Southeast, Renton, Washington". In our opinion, the proposed residential development is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. Our subsurface exploration indicates the site is primarily underlain by Vashon till. During our subsurface exploration completed on October 14, 2015, groundwater seepage was not encountered at the test pit locations; nonetheless, discrete, perched seepage zones should be anticipated during construction depending on the time of year grading activities take place. In our opinion, the proposed residential structures may be supported atop conventional continuous and spread footing foundations bearing on competent native soil, recompacted native soil, or new structural fill. In general, competent native soil suitable for support of new foundations will be encountered within the upper two to three feet of existing grades. Where loose or unsuitable soil conditions are exposed at foundation subgrade elevations, compaction of the soils to the specifications of structural fill, or overexcavation and replacement with a suitable structural fill material, will be necessary. Construction of the proposed stormwater detention vault is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. We anticipate competent, dense to very dense, undisturbed Vashon till will be encountered within excavations at depth for the vault foundation subgrade elevation. Because the native soils are largely comprised of Vashon till, it is our opinion infiltration into native soils should be considered generally infeasible. Recommendations for foundation design, site preparation, drainage, preliminary stormwater detention vault design, and other pertinent development aspects are provided in this study. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have questions regarding the content of this geotechnical engineering study, please call. Sincerely, EARTH SOLUTIONS NW, LLC Keven D. Hoffmann, E.I.T. Project Engineer 1805 -136th Place N.E., Suite 201 • Bellevue, WA 98005 • (425) 449-4704 • FAX (425) 449-4711 Table of Contents ES-3613 INTRODUCTION ................................................................... .. General ....................................................................... . Project Description ....................................................... . SITE CONDITIONS ................................................................ .. Surface ....................................................................... . Subsurface .................................................................. . Topsoil and Fill ................................................... . Native Soil ......................................................... .. Geologic Setting ................................................ .. Groundwater ................................................................ . DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................ , ................ . General ....................................................................... . Site Preparation and Earthwork ...................................... . Temporary Erosion Control.. ....................................... . Stripping ....................................................................... .. In-situ Soils .................................................................. .. Imported Soils .............................................................. .. Subgrade Preparation ......................................... .. Structural Fill ............................................................... .. Foundations ................................................................ . S . . D . e1sm1c es1gn ............................................................ . Slab-on-Grade Floors ................................................... . Retaining Walls ........................................................... .. Drainage ................................................................................... . Infiltration Feasibility ........................................... . Preliminary Detention Vault Design ........................ . Excavations and Slopes ..................................... , ................... . Pavement Sections ...................................................... .. Utility Support and Trench Backfill .................................. . LIMITATIONS ........................................................................ .. Additional Services ...................................................... .. Earth Solutions NW, LLC PAGE 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 8 9 9 10 11 11 12 12 GRAPHICS Plate 1 Plate 2 Plate 3 Plate 4 APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B Table of Contents Cont'd ES-3613 Vicinity Map Test Pit Location Plan Retaining Wall Drainage Detail Footing Drain Detail Subsurface Exploration Test Pit Logs Laboratory Test Results Earth Solutions W.J, LLC General GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION 17033 -108TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST RENTON, WASHINGTON ES-3613 INTRODUCTION This geotechnical engineerin~ study was prepared for the proposed residential subdivision to be completed at 17033 -108 h Avenue Southeast in Renton, Washington. The purpose of this study was to provide geotechnical recommendations for currently proposed development plans. Our scope of services for completing this geotechnical engineering study included the following: • Completing subsurface test pits for purposes of characterizing site soils; • Completing laboratory testing of soil samples collected at the test pit locations; • Conducting engineering analyses, and; • Preparation of this report. The following documents and maps were reviewed as part of our report preparation: • Geologic Map of the Renton Quadrangle, King County, Washington, by D. R. Mullineaux, 1965. • Liquefaction Susceptibility of King County (Map 11-5), prepared by the King County Flood Control District, May 2010; • Site Plan, Sheet No. A1 .0, prepared by Mark Travers Architect, dated September 30, 2014, and; • Online Web Soil Survey (WSS) resource, provided by the Natural Resources Conservation Service under the United States Department of Agriculture. Project Description We understand the proposed development will include construction of 16 single-family residential lots, access and drive tracts, a stormwater detention vault (vault), and other associated improvements. Rockeries and/or retaining walls may be incorporated into final designs to accommodate grade transitions, where necessary. The vault is proposed for construction generally within the central site area, and we anticipate excavations to reach the vault foundation subgrade elevation will be on the order of 10 feet bgs. To the best of our knowledge, the site is not associated with any geotechnically relevant geologic hazards as defined by the City of Renton. Mr. Stein Skattum November 11, 2015 ES-3613 Page2 At the time of report submission, specific grading and building load plans were not available for review; however, based on our experience with similar developments, the proposed residential structures will likely be constructed at grade (following site mass grading) utilizing relatively lightly-loaded wood framing supported on conventional foundations. We anticipate the residential structures will incorporate slab-on-grade floors or crawl space construction at grade. We anticipate perimeter footing loads on the order of 1 to 2 kips per lineal foot (kif). Slab-on- grade loading is anticipated to be on the order of 150 pounds per square foot (psf). If the above design assumptions are incorrect or change, ESNW should be contacted to review the recommendations in this report. ESNW should review final designs to confirm that our geotechnical recommendations have been incorporated into the plans. SITE CONDITIONS Surface The subject site is located northwest of the intersection between Southeast 172"d Street and 1081h Avenue Southeast in Renton, Washington. The site and the surrounding upland area are commonly referred to as Benson Hill. The approximate location of the property is illustrated on Plate 1 (Vicinity Map). The rectangular property is comprised of two adjoining tax parcels (King County Parcel Nos. 008700-0285 and -0293) totaling approximately 1.51 acres. The site is enveloped to the north and west by single-family residential homes, to the south by Southeast 172nd Street, and to the east by 1081h Avenue Northeast. A single-family residence and associated outbuildings currently occupy the site and will be removed in lieu of the proposed subdivision. The existing topography is relatively level across the central and northern areas of the site; grades descend approximately 5 to 1 O feet within the western and southern site areas to each respective property line. Existing vegetation is comprised primarily of dense tree, brush, and bramble cover across the majority of the southern two-thirds of the site. Subsurface An ESNW representative observed, logged, and sampled seven test pits, excavated at accessible locations within the proposed development area, on October 14, 2015 using a mini trackhoe and operator retained by our firm. The test pits were completed for purposes of assessing soil conditions, classifying site soils, and investigating the presence of groundwater below the existing ground surface (bgs). The approximate locations of the test pits are depicted on Plate 2 (Test Pit Location Plan). Please refer to the test pit logs provided in Appendix A for a more detailed description of subsurface conditions. Soil samples collected at the test pit locations were analyzed in accordance with both United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) methods and procedures. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Mr. Stein Skattum November 11, 2015 Topsoil and Fill ES-3613 Page 3 In general, topsoil was encountered within the upper 6 to 15 inches of existing grades at the test pit locations. The topsoil was characterized by dark brown color, the presence of fine organic material, and small root intrusions. Based on our field observations, we expect topsoil will be encountered within the upper 9 to 10 inches of existing grades. Fill was not explicitly encountered at the test pit locations during our fieldwork. We suspect fill will be encountered within proximity to existing structural improvements. If desired, ESNW should verify the suitability of existing fill deposits, where encountered, to be reused as structural fill. Native Soil Underlying topsoil, native soils at the test pit locations were comprised primarily of silty sand with gravel (USCS: SM), consistent with the typical makeup of Vashon till. It is noted sandstone deposits and fragments were encountered at TP-3 near a depth of about two to four feet bgs. In general, the upper two to four feet of the Vashon till was characterized as "weathered" and was encountered in a loose to medium dense state, while the Vashon till at depth was characterized as "unweathered" and was encountered in a dense state. The presence of iron oxide staining was also considered in our characterization of the upper Vashon till deposits as "weathered". Native soils were primarily encountered in a damp condition and extended to the maximum exploration depth of eight feet bgs. Geologic Setting The referenced geologic map resource identifies ground moraine deposits (Qgt), otherwise known as Vashon till, as underlying the site and surrounding areas. According to the geologic map resource, Vashon till is typically a compact, coherent, and unsorted mixture of sand, silt, clay, and gravel which is commonly referred to as "hardpan". The referenced WSS resource identifies Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (Map Unit Symbol: AgC) across the site and surrounding parcels. The Alderwood series was formed in hills and ridges. Based on our field observations, native soils underlying the subject site, specifically those likely to be encountered during construction, are consistent with ground moraine deposits (Vashon till) as described in this section. The deposits encountered on site are consistent with those areas across the majority of Benson Hill, which are also mapped to be underlain primarily by Vashon till. Based on our field observations, as well as the results of previous explorations on nearby properties, bedrock of the Renton formation is likely present at depth underlying the Vashon till. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Mr. Stein Skattum November 11, 2015 Groundwater ES-3613 Page4 During our subsurface exploration completed on October 14, 2015, groundwater seepage was not encountered at the test pit locations. Iron oxide staining was observed within the upper one to three feet of existing grades. In our opinion, discrete, perched groundwater seepage zones may be encountered during construction, particularly within excavations at depth for site utilities and the vault. Groundwater seepage rates and elevations fluctuate depending on many factors, including precipitation duration and intensity, the time of year, and soil conditions. In general, groundwater flow rates are higher during the wetter, winter months. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General In our opinion, construction of the proposed residential development on the subject site is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. The primary geotechnical considerations associated with the proposed development include foundation support, slab-on-grade subgrade support, the suitability of using on-site soils as structural fill, and construction of the vault. In our opinion, the proposed residential structures may be supported atop conventional continuous and spread footing foundations bearing on competent native soil, recompacted native soil, or new structural fill. In general, competent native soil suitable for support of new foundations will be encountered within the upper two to three feet of existing grades. Where loose or unsuitable soil conditions are exposed at foundation subgrade elevations, compaction of the soils to the specifications of structural fill, or overexcavation and replacement with a suitable structural fill material, will be necessary. Construction of the proposed stormwater detention vault is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. We anticipate competent, dense to very dense, undisturbed Vashon till will be encountered within excavations at depth for the vault foundation subgrade elevation. Because the native soils are largely comprised of Vashon till, it is our opinion infiltration into native soils should be considered generally infeasible. This study has been prepared for the exclusive use of Mr. Stein Skattum and his representatives. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This study has been prepared in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. Site Preparation and Earthwork Initial site preparation activities will consist of installing temporary erosion control measures, establishing grading limits, removing existing structural improvements, and performing clearing and site stripping (as necessary). Subsequent earthwork activities will involve mass site grading and related infrastructure improvements. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Mr. Stein Skattum November 11, 2015 Temporary Erosion Control ES-3613 Page 5 Ingress and egress to the proposed development will be provided off both Southeast 172nd Street and 1081h Avenue Northeast. Prior to finished pavement installation, temporary construction entrances and drive lanes, consisting of at least 12 inches of quarry spalls, should be considered in order to minimize off-site soil tracking and to provide a stable access entrance surface. Geotextile fabric may also be considered underlying the quarry spalls for greater stability of the temporary construction entrance. Erosion control measures should consist of silt fencing placed around down gradient margins of the site. Soil stockpiles should be covered or otherwise protected to reduce soil erosion. Temporary approaches for controlling surface water runoff should be established prior to beginning earthwork activities. Additional Best Management Practices (BMPs), as specified by the project civil engineer and indicated on the plans, should be incorporated into construction activities. Stripping In general, topsoil was encountered within the upper 6 to 15 inches of existing grades at the test pit locations. For preliminary estimation purposes, it is our opinion an average topsoil stripping depth of 9 to 10 inches should be anticipated. ESNW should be retained to observe site stripping activities at the time of construction in order to assess the required degree of stripping. Over-stripping should be avoided as it is unnecessary and may result in increased project development costs. Topsoil and organic-rich soil is neither suitable for foundation support nor for use as structural fill. Topsoil and organic-rich soil may be used in non-structural areas if desired. In-situ Soils From a geotechnical standpoint, in general, our field observations indicate on-site soils likely to be encountered during construction will be suitable for use as structural fill, provided the soil moisture content is at (or slightly above) the optimum level at the time of placement and compaction. Site soils should be considered highly moisture sensitive, and successful use of on-site soils as structural fill will largely be dictated by the moisture content at the time of placement and compaction. Soil that is found to be dry at the time of installation will likely require moisture conditioning (typically achieved through the application of water) prior to soil compaction. Soil encountered during site excavations that is excessively over the optimum moisture content will likewise require moisture conditioning (typically achieved through soil aeration) prior to placement and compaction. It should be emphasized native material should never be placed and compacted dry of the optimum moisture content, especially in site utility trench applications. If the on-site soils cannot be successfully compacted, the use of an imported soil may be necessary. Earth Solutions 'MN, LLC Mr. Stein Skattum November 11, 2015 Imported Soils ES-3613 Page 6 Where necessary, imported soil intended for use as structural fill should consist of a well- graded granular soil with a moisture content that is at or slightly above the optimum level. During wet weather conditions, imported soil intended for use as structural fill should consist of a well-graded granular soil with a fines content of 5 percent or less (defined as the percent passing the Number 200 sieve, based on the minus three-quarter inch fraction). Subgrade Preparation Foundation and slab subgrade surfaces constructed atop both native soils and/or compacted structural fill should exhibit firm and stable characteristics. Uniform compaction of the foundation and slab subgrade areas may be necessary to establish a consistent subgrade condition below the foundation and slab elements. ESNW should observe subgrade areas prior to placing formwork. Supplementary recommendations for subgrade improvement may be provided at the time of construction and would likely include further mechanical compaction or overexcavation and replacement with suitable structural fill. Structural Fill Structural fill is defined as compacted soil placed in foundation, slab-on-grade, and roadway areas. Fills placed to construct permanent slopes and throughout retaining wall and utility trench backfill areas are also considered structural fill. Soils placed in structural areas should be placed in loose lifts of 12 inches or less and compacted to a relative compaction of at least 90 percent, based on the laboratory maximum dry density as determined by the Modified Proctor Method (ASTM D1557). Soil placed in the upper 12 inches of slab-on-grade, utility trench, and pavement areas should be compacted to a relative compaction of at least 95 percent. More stringent compaction specifications may be required for utility trench backfill zones depending on the responsible utility district or jurisdiction. Foundations In our opinion, the proposed residential structures may be supported atop conventional continuous and spread footing foundations bearing on competent native soil, recompacted native soil, or new structural fill. In general, competent native soil suitable for support of new foundations will be encountered within the upper two to three feet of existing grades. Where loose or unsuitable soil conditions are exposed at foundation subgrade elevations, compaction of the soils to the specifications of structural fill, or overexcavation and replacement with a suitable structural fill material, will be necessary. Provided foundations will be supported as described above, the following parameters may be used for design: • Allowable soil bearing capacity • Passive earth pressure • Coefficient of friction Earth Solutions NW, LLC 2,500 psf 350 pcf (equivalent fluid) 0.40 Mr. Stein Skattum November 11, 2015 ES-3613 Page 7 A one-third increase in the allowable soil bearing capacity may be assumed for short-term wind and seismic loading conditions. The above passive pressure and friction values include a minimum factor-of-safety of 1.5. With structural loading as expected, total settlement in the range of one inch, as well as differential settlement of approximately one-half inch, is anticipated. The majority of the settlements should occur during construction as dead loads are applied. Seismic Design The 2012 International Building Code recognizes the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) for seismic site class definitions. In accordance with Table 20.3-1 of the ASCE Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures manual, Site Class D should be used for design. The referenced liquefaction susceptibility map indicates the site and surrounding areas maintain very low liquefaction susceptibility. Liquefaction is a phenomenon where saturated or loose soils suddenly lose internal strength and behave as a fluid. This behavior is in response to increased pore water pressures resulting from an earthquake or other intense ground shaking. Based on our field observations, it is our opinion site susceptibility to liquefaction during a seismic event may be considered negligible. The relatively consistent densities of native soils at depth and the absence of a uniformly established, shallow groundwater table were the primary bases for this opinion. Slab-on-Grade Floors Slab-on-grade floors for the proposed residential structures should be supported on a firm and unyielding subgrade. Where feasible, native soil likely to be exposed at the slab-on-grade subgrade levels can be compacted in situ to the specifications of structural fill. Unstable or yielding areas of the subgrade should be recompacted, or overexcavated and replaced with suitable structural fill, prior to construction of the slab. Highly organic soils exposed at slab-on- grade subgrade elevations will likely require overexcavation and replacement with suitable structural fill. A capillary break consisting of at least four inches of free-draining crushed rock or gravel should be placed below the slab. The free-draining material should have a fines content of 5 percent or less (percent passing the Number 200 sieve, based on the minus three-quarter inch fraction). In areas where slab moisture is undesirable, installation of a vapor barrier below the slab should be considered. If a vapor barrier is to be utilized, it should be a material specifically designed for use as a vapor barrier and should be installed in accordance with the specifications of the manufacturer. Retaining Walls Retaining walls must be designed to resist earth pressures and applicable surcharge loads. The following parameters may be used for design: Earth Solutions NW, LLC Mr. Stein Skattum November 11, 2015 • Active earth pressure (yielding condition) • At-rest earth pressure (restrained condition) • Traffic surcharge* (passenger vehicles) • Passive earth pressure • Coefficient of friction • Seismic surcharge • Where applicable " Where H equals the retained height (in feel) 35 pcf (equivalent fluid) 50 pcf ES-3613 Page 8 70 psf (rectangular distribution) 350 pcf (equivalent fluid) 0.40 6H psf** The above design parameters are based on a level backfill condition and level grade at the wall toe. Revised design values will be necessary if sloping grades are to be used above or below retaining walls. Additional surcharge loading from adjacent foundations, sloped backfill, or other relevant loads should be included in the retaining wall design. Retaining walls should be backfilled with free-draining material that extends along the height of the wall and a distance of at least 18 inches behind the wall. The upper 12 inches of the wall backfill may consist of a less permeable soil, if desired. A perforated drain pipe should be placed along the base of the wall and connected to an approved discharge location. A typical retaining wall drainage detail is provided on Plate 3. If drainage is not provided, hydrostatic pressures should be included in the wall design. Drainage Although groundwater was not explicitly encountered at the test pit locations during our fieldwork, it is our opinion discrete, perched groundwater seepage zones should be anticipated within site excavations depending on the time of year grading operations take place, particularly within excavations at depth for site utilities and the vault. Temporary measures to control surface water runoff and groundwater during construction would likely involve interceptor trenches and sumps. ESNW should be consulted during preliminary grading to identify areas of seepage and to provide recommendations to reduce the potential for instability related to seepage effects. Finish grades must be designed to direct surface drain water away from structures and slopes. Water must not be allowed to pond adjacent to structures or slopes. In our opinion, foundation drains should be installed along building perimeter footings. A typical foundation drain detail is provided on Plate 4. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Mr. Stein Skattum November 11, 2015 Infiltration Feasibility ES-3613 Page 9 As indicated in the Subsurface section of this report, native soils encountered during our fieldwork were characterized primarily as Vashon till. Subsequent to USDA textural analyses, the Vashon till was further classified primarily as gravelly sandy loam. From a geotechnical standpoint, the Vashon till should not be considered an ideal geologic feature to accommodate infiltration, especially when encountered in a dense, compact state. In general, the Vashon till should not be considered feasible for infiltration purposes. It should be noted, however, Vashon till can likely accommodate construction of rain gardens (bioretention) and other limited- infiltration facilities. ESNW can provide further evaluation of, and recommendations for, stormwater flow control BMPs upon request. Preliminary Detention Vault Design Stormwater is proposed to be managed by a below-grade detention vault which is proposed for construction generally within the central portion of the site. Specific grading plans for the vault were not available for review at the time of report preparation; however, we anticipate grade cuts on the order of 10 feet will be necessary to achieve the vault foundation subgrade elevation. Based on our field observations, grade cuts for the vault are likely to expose dense to very dense, undisturbed Vashon till. The vault foundation should be supported on competent native soil or crushed rock placed atop competent native soil. The final vault design must incorporate adequate buffer space from property boundaries such that temporary excavations to construct the vault structure may be successfully completed. Perimeter drains should be installed around the vault and conveyed to an approved discharge point. Perched groundwater seepage should be anticipated within excavations for the vault. The following preliminary design parameters may be used for the vault: • Allowable soil bearing capacity (dense Vashon till) • Active earth pressure (unrestrained) • Active earth pressure (unrestrained, hydrostatic) • At-rest earth pressure (restrained) • At-rest earth pressure (restrained, hydrostatic) • Coefficient of friction • Passive earth pressure Earth Solutions NW, LLC 5,000 psf 35 pcf 80 pcf 50 pcf 95 pcf 0.40 350 pcf Mr. Stein Skattum November 11, 2015 ES-3613 Page 10 Retaining walls should be backfilled with free-draining material or suitable sheet drainage that extends along the height of the walls. The upper one foot of the wall backfill may consist of a less permeable soil, if desired. A perforated drain pipe should be placed along the base of the wall and connected to an approved discharge location. If the elevation of the vault bottom is such that gravity flow to an outlet is not possible, the portion of the vault below the drain should be designed to include hydrostatic pressure. ESNW should observe grading operations for the vault and subgrade conditions prior to concrete forming and pouring. If the soil conditions encountered during construction differ from those anticipated, supplementary recommendations may be provided. ESNW should be contacted to review final vault designs to confirm appropriate geotechnical parameters have been incorporated, as necessary. Excavations and Slopes The Federal Occupation Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act (WISHA) provide soil classification in terms of temporary slope inclinations. Soils that exhibit a high compressive strength are allowed steeper temporary slope inclinations than are soils that exhibit a lower compressive strength. Based on the soil conditions encountered at the test pit locations, both loose and medium dense soils, as well as any area where groundwater seepage is exposed, are classified as Type C by OSHA and WISHA. Where encountered, fill should also be considered Type C soil. Temporary slopes over four feet in height in Type C soils must be sloped no steeper than one- and-one-half horizontal to one vertical (1.5H:1V). Dense, undisturbed native deposits encountered without the presence of groundwater may be classified as Type A by OSHA and WISHA. Temporary slopes over four feet in height in Type A soils must be sloped no steeper than 0.75H:1V. Type A soils that are fissured, subjected to vibrations from heavy traffic, or have been otherwise previously disturbed must be classified as Type B by OSHA and WISHA. Temporary slopes over four feet in height in Type B soils must be sloped no steeper than 1 H: 1 V. Steeper excavations for the vault may be permissible provided the excavations expose very dense, cemented Vashon till. ESNW can provide supplementary recommendations, including field observations of excavations for the vault, during the appropriate phase of construction. Where encountered, the presence of perched groundwater may cause caving of the temporary slopes due to hydrostatic pressure. ESNW should observe site excavations to confirm soil types and allowable slope inclinations. If the recommended temporary slope inclinations cannot be achieved, temporary shoring may be necessary to support excavations. Permanent slopes should be planted with vegetation to enhance stability and to minimize erosion and should maintain a gradient of 2H:1V or flatter. An ESNW representative should observe temporary and permanent slopes to confirm the slope inclinations are suitable for the exposed soil conditions. Supplementary recommendations with respect to excavations and slopes may be provided as conditions warrant. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Mr. Stein Skattum November 11, 2015 Pavement Sections ES-3613 Page 11 The performance of site pavements is largely related to the condition of the underlying subgrade. To ensure adequate pavement performance, the subgrade should be in a firm and unyielding condition when subjected to proofrolling with a loaded dump truck. Structural fill in pavement areas should be compacted to the specifications previously detailed in this report. II is possible that soft, wet, or otherwise unsuitable subgrade areas may still exist after base grading activities. Areas containing unsuitable or yielding subgrade conditions will require remedial measures, such as overexcavation and replacement with crushed rock or structural fill, prior to pavement. We anticipate new pavement sections will be subjected primarily to passenger vehicle traffic. For lightly loaded pavement areas subjected primarily to passenger vehicles, the following preliminary pavement sections may be considered: • A minimum of two inches of hot mix asphalt (HMA) placed over four inches of crushed rock base (CRB), or; • A minimum of two inches of HMA placed over three inches of asphalt treated base (ATB). The HMA, ATB and CRB materials should conform to WSDOT specifications. All soil base material should be compacted to a relative compaction of 95 percent, based on the laboratory maximum dry density as determined by ASTM 01557. Final pavement design parameters, including recommendations for heavy traffic areas or access roads, may be provided once final traffic loading has been determined. Road standards utilized by the City of Renton may supersede the recommendations provided in this report. Utility Support and Trench Backfill In our opinion, on-site soils will generally be suitable for support of utilities. Remedial measures may be necessary in some areas in order to provide support for utilities, such as overexcavation and replacement with structural fill, or placement of geotextile fabric. Groundwater seepage may be encountered within utility excavations and caving of trench walls may occur where groundwater is encountered. Depending on the time of year and conditions encountered, dewatering, as well as temporary trench shoring, may be necessary during utility excavation and installation. In general, on-site soils will likely be suitable for use as structural backfill throughout utility trench excavations provided the soil is at or near the optimum moisture content at the time of placement and compaction. Moisture conditioning of the soils may be necessary at some locations prior to use as structural fill. Each section of the utility lines must be adequately supported in the bedding material. Utility trench backfill should be placed and compacted to the specifications of structural fill as previously detailed in this report, or to the applicable specifications of the City of Renton or other responsible jurisdiction or agency. Earth Solutions f'.r.N, LLC Mr. Stein Skattum November 11, 2015 LIMITATIONS ES-3613 Page 12 The recommendations and conclusions provided in this geotechnical engineering study are professional opinions consistent with the level of care and skill that is typical of other members in the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. A warranty is not expressed or implied. Variations in the soil and groundwater conditions observed at the test pit locations may exist and may not become evident until construction. ESNW should reevaluate the conclusions in this geotechnical engineering study if variations are encountered. Additional Services ESNW should have an opportunity to review final project plans with respect to geotechnical recommendations provided in this report. ESNW should also be retained to provide testing and consultation services during construction. Earth Solutions NW, LLC ·-....... ,·-UI( ! "-tlIHi ': Reference: King County, Washington Map 656 By the Thomas Guide Rand McNally 32nd Edition NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color. ESNW cannot be responsible for any subsequent misinterpretation of the information resulting from black & white reproductions of this plate. •~ •.. ·_ .. ••• .. •. ,, ' Vicinity Map 172nd Street Subdivision Renton, Washington Drwn. GLS Date 10/22/2015 Proj. No. 3613 Checked KOH Date Oct. 2015 Plate 1 ITP-4 LI..! ::J z LI..! ~ I l-oo 0 400 S.E. 172N D STR-EET LEGEND -l-Approximate Location of TP-1 I ESNW Test Pit, Proj. No. ES-3613, Oct. 2015 ; --, Subject Site ___ I 12 Proposed Lot Number D Existing Building NOTE: The graphics shown on this plate are not intended for design purposes or precise scale measurements, but only to illustrate the approximate test locations relative to the approximate locations of existing and/ or proposed site features. The information illustrated is largely based on data provided by the client at the time of our study. ESNW cannot be responsible for subsequent design changes or interpretation of the data by others. NORTH 8 1 "=60' •'_' I rth Solutions NWuc hnical Engineering. Construction Monitoring f( and Environmental Sciences Test Pit Location Plan 172nd Street Subdivision Renton, Washington NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color. ESNW cannot be Drwn. GLS Date 10/22/2015 Proj. No. 3613 responsible for any subsequent misinterpretation of the information resulting from black & white reproductions of this plate. Checked KOH Date Oct. 2015 Plate 2 .. NOTES: • Free Draining Backfill should consist of soil having less than 5 percent fines. Percent passing #4 should be 25 to 75 percent. • Sheet Drain may be feasible in lieu of Free Draining Backfill, per ESNW recommendations. • Drain Pipe should consist of perforated, rigid PVC Pipe surrounded with 1" Drain Rock. LEGEND: Free-Draining Structural Backfill 1-inch Drain Rock 18" Min. ~1 Structural Fill SCHEMATIC ONLY -NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING Earth .Earth Solutions NWuc Solutions...._ ____________ _ NWLLC Geotechnical Engineering, Conscruccion Monitoring ) . and Environmental Sciences -E& RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL 172nd Street Subdivision Renton, Washington Drwn. GLS Date 10/23/2015 Proj. No. 3613 Checked KDH Date Oct. 2015 Plate 3 l Slope . . . . . ' ... ,: : : :, . ' ' . ... Perforated Rigid Drain Pipe (Surround with 1" Rock) NOTES: • Do NOT tie roof downspouts to Footing Drain. • Surface Seal to consist of 12" of less permeable, suitable soil. Slope away from building. LEGEND: Surface Seal; native soil or other low permeability material. 1" Drain Rock SCHEMATIC ONLY-NOTTO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING Earth Solutions NWLLc ' technical Engmeer1ng, Construction Monitoring '-' and Environmental Sciences 'l • Drwn. GLS FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL 172nd Street Subdivision Renton, Washington Date 10/23/2015 Proj. No. 3613 Checked KDH Date Oct. 2015 Plate 4 Appendix A Subsurface Exploration Test Pit Logs ES-3613 The subsurface conditions at the site were explored on October 14, 2015 by excavating seven test pits using an mini trackhoe and operator retained by our firm. The approximate locations of the subsurface exploration test pits are illustrated on Plate 2 of this study. The subsurface test pit logs are provided in this Appendix. The test pits were advanced to a maximum depth of eight feet bgs. The final logs represent the interpretations of the field logs and the results of laboratory analyses. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. In actuality, the transitions may be more gradual. Earth Solutions NW. LLC Earth Solutions NWLLc SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOLS GRAPH LETIER TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS COARSE GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% OF MATERIAL IS LARGER THAN NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE FINE GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% OF MATERIAL 1S SMALLER THAN NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE GRAVEL AND GRAVELLY SOILS MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION RETAINED ON NO. 4 SIEVE SAND AND SANDY SOILS CLEAN GRAVELS (UTILE OR NO FINES) GRAVELS WITH FINES (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF FINES) CLEAN SANDS (LITTLE OR NO FINES) SANDS WITH MORE THAN 50% FINES OF COARSE FRACTION PASSING ON NO. 4 SIEVE (APPRECIABLE SILTS AND CLAYS SILTS AND CLAYS AMOUNT OF FINES) LIQUID LIMIT LESS THAN 50 LIQUID LIMIT GREATER THAN 50 HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS GW GP GM GC SW SP SM SC ML CL OL MH CH OH PT WELL-GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL- SANO MIXTURES, UTILE OR NO FINES POORLY-GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND MIXTURES, UTILE OR NO FINES SIL TY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND - SILT MIX1URES CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND - CLAY MIXTURES WELL-GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES POORLY-GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SAND, UTILE OR NO FINES SILTY SANOS, SAND-SILT MIXTURES Cl.A VEY SANDS, SAND -CLAY MIXTURES INORGANIC SILTS ANO VERY F!NE SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SIL TY OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY INORGANIC CLAYS OF I.OW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS ORGANIC SIL TS AND ORGANIC SIL TY CL.A YS OF LOW PLASTICITY INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND OR SILTY SOILS INORGANIC CLAYS OF HtGH PLASTICITY ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTS PEAT, HUMUS, SWAMP SOILS WITH HIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS DUAL SYMBOLS are used to indicate borderline soil classifications. The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the material presented in the attached logs. • Earth Solutions NW TEST PIT NUMBER TP-1 1805 -136th Place N.E., Suite 201 PAGE 1 OF 1 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Telephone: 425-449-4704 Fax: 425-449-4711 CLIENT Mr. Stein Skattum PROJECT NAME 172nd Street Subdivision PROJECT NUMBER 3613 PROJECT LOCATION Renton 1 Washington DATE STARTED 10/14115 COMPLETED 10/14/15 GROUND ELEVATION TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION LOGGED BY JSQI!___ ______ CHECKED BY KOH AT END OF EXCAVATION ----·-~ -- NOTES DeQth ofToosoil & Sod 10": dense brambles AFTER EXCAVATION - UJ a. CJ :I: ~ffi <Ii te UJ"' <.i 'i: <!) TESTS a.o MATERIAL DESCRIPTION UJ---'::; "1 12--' C a.:::, !z :::, <!) 0 TPSL -Dark brown TOPSOIL, roots to 2.5' ,, ,11, 0.9 -Brown silty SAND, loose to medium dense, damp (Weathered Till) MC= 6.80% -iron oxide staining ---trace gravel -becomes medium dense - MC =7.40% SM -becomes silty sand with gravel, medium dense to dense, moist -. -mottled texture e-L -weak cementation MC= 12.90% -· -7.0 Test pit terminated at 7.0 feet belOW existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 7.0 feet. • Earth Solutions NW TEST PIT NUMBER TP-2 1805 • 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 PAGE 1 OF 1 Telephone: 425-449-4704 Fax: 425-449-4711 CLIENT Mr. Stein Skattum PROJECT NAME 172nd Street Subdivision PROJECT NUMBER 3613 PROJECT LOCATION Renton 1 Washington DATE STARTED 10/14/15 COMPLETED 10/14/15 GROUND ELEVATION TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION - LOGGED BY KOH CHECKED BY KOH AT END OF EXCAVATION - NOTES DeE1!h ofTQ!!soil & Sod 10" -12": brush, fems AFTER EXCAVATION w 0. 0 :,: /: ffi ui :i:(!) Ii:<= wen TESTS cj "-o MA TERI AL DESCRIPTION w--' ::; 0 ;:; ... 0 0. ::, ::.z ::, (!) <( "' 0 '' Dark brown TOPSOIL, roots to 4' TPSL ,, ,,,, . -1.0 -. Brown silty SAND, loose to medium dense, dry to damp (Weathered Till) MC= 7.00% -trace gravel, iron oxide staining Fines = 20. 30% [USDA Classification: very gravelly sandy LOAM] --becomes medium dense -MC =8.40% SM 5 -becomes brownish gray silty sand with gravel, medium dense to dense, moist {unweathered ~ till) -weak to moderate cementation . MC =9 . .'20% 7.0 Test pit terminated at 7.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 7.0 feet. • Earth Solutions NW TEST PIT NUMBER TP-3 1805 -136th Place N.E., Suite 201 PAGE 1 OF 1 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Telephone: 425449-4704 Fax: 425-4494711 CLIENT _.M_l:}~!_ejn Skattum PROJECT NAME 172nd Street Subdivi~JQ~ _,, ... PROJECT NUMBER 3613 PROJECT LOCATION Renton, Washington DATE STARTED 10/14/15 COMPLETED 10/14/15 GROUND ELEVATION TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION ---- LOGGED BY KDH CHECKED BY KDH AT END OF EXCAVATION - NOTES Depth of Topsoil & Sod 13" -15": duff AFTER EXCAVATION - UJ "- J: i':ffi u; () 'i' <!> ti:= uJ "' TESTS cj "-o MATERIAL DESCRIPTION w-_,::. u; ~ _, 0 a_:::, ::Oz :::, (!) "' "' 0 ~ ' Dark brown TOPSOIL, roots to 2' TPSL !~ ~ ,,,, I 1.3 Tan silty SAND, loose to medium dense, dry to damp MC= 4.90% -trace gravel -sandstone pieces -iron oxide staining -becomes medium dense MC 0 4.90% SM -sandstone bed on west side of test pit from 3' to 3. 75' 5 ~ -becomes medium dense to dense -weak cementation MC =4.40% , .. Test pit terminated at 6.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 6.5 feet. • Earth Solutions NW TEST PIT NUMBER TP-4 1805-136th Place N.E., Suite 201 PAGE 1 OF 1 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Telephone: 425-449-4704 Fax: 425-449-4711 CLIENT Mr. Stein Skattum PROJECT NAME 172nd Street Subdivision PROJECT NUMBER 3613 PROJECT LOCATION Renton, Washington DATE STARTED 10/14/15 COMPLETED 10/14/15 GROUND ELEVATION TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION -- LOGGED BY KOH CHECKED BY KOH AT END OF EXCAVATION - NOTES Deoth of Topsoil & Sod 6" -7": brambles. glass AFTER EXCAVATION - w .. 0 I ~ ffi <n li:s-wai <.i :i:" TESTS "-o MATERIAL DESCRIPTION w-...J:. <n ~...J 0 o.::, =i :. z " <( "' 0 TPSL ~-'._ 0.5 Dark brown TOPSOIL, roots to 2' Brown silty SANO with gravel, loose to medium dense, moist (Weathered Till) MC= 12.80% " --small boulder SM -becomes medium dense to dense " MC= 4.10% f--------Q__ -becomes gray, dense (unweathered till) -weak cementation " -MC= 5.30% 6.0 Test pit terminated at 6.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom oftest pit at 6.0 feet. • Earth Solutions NW TEST PIT NUMBER TP-5 1805. 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 PAGE 1 OF 1 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Telephone: 425-449-4704 Fax: 425-449-471 1 CLIENT Mr. Stein Skattum PROJECT NAME 172nd Street Subdivision PROJECT NUMBER 3613 PROJECT LOCATION Renton 1 Washington DATE STARTED 10/14115 COMPLETED 10/14115 GROUND ELEVATION TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD ATTIME OF EXCAVATION . LOGGED BY KOH CHECKED BY KOH AT END OF EXCAVATION - NOTES Depth of Topsoil & Sod 9": dense brambles AFTER EXCAVATION -· w a. :,: ~ffi Iii (J ts-wee t.i :i:c, w-...J::!E TESTS Iii ~g MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Cl ~i1 :i C) n irPSL )_'. ~ Dark brown TOPSOIL, roots to 2' ',£ il 0.8 '" . Brown silty SAND, loose to medium dense, damp (Weathered Till) " MC=3.70% -becomes tan, medium dense -fron oxide staining MC= 8.60% -Fines= 37.60% SM -becomes brownish gray, dense (unYJeathered till) _L [USDA Classification: slightly gravelly fine sandy LOAM] -weak to moderate cementation MC• 8.30% -becomes very dense - -. -. MC•6.60% 8.0 Test pit terminated at 8.0 feet below existing grade due to very dense Till. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom oftest pit at 8.0 feet. • Earth Solutions NW TEST PIT NUMBER TP-6 1805 -136th Place N.E., Suite 201 PAGE 1 OF 1 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Telephone: 425-449-4704 Fax: 425-449-4711 CLIENT Mr. Stein Skattum PROJECT NAME 172nd Street Subdivision PROJECT NUMBER 3613 PROJECT LOCATION Renton. Washington DATE STARTED _lQ/14/15 ---COMPLETED 10/14/15 GROUND ELEVATION TEST PIT SIZE ---- EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION ... ------ LOGGED BY KOH CHECKED BY KOH AT ENO OF EXCAVATION ... NOTES Depth ofTopsoil & Sod 12": duff AFTER EXCAVATION - w 0. :,: j': ffi ui (.l ~i: w"' c.:i I Cl w--' :. TESTS ui ~g MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0 0.:, ::i :Oz (!) <( V, 0 0;.'. Dark brown TOPSOIL, roots to 3' TPSL, ; ,1 ,, a -1.0 f--Brown silty SAND, loose to medium dense, damp (Weathered Till) " -MC =6.50% -iron oxide staining SM -becomes medium dense -- MC= 8.60% -weak cementation to BOH -- 4.S _L Gray sandy SILT, medium dense to dense, moist (Unweathered Till) ML MC= 16.20% 6.0 [USDA Classification: slightly gravelly LOAM] ----- Fines= 61.70% Test pit terminated at 6.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 6.0 feet. • Earth Solutions NW TEST PIT NUMBER TP-7 1805 -136th Place N.E .• Suite 201 PAGE 1 OF 1 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Telephone: 425-449-4704 Fax: 425-449-4711 CLIENT Mr. Stein Skattum PROJECT NAME 172nd Street Subdivision PROJECT NUMBER 3613 PROJECT LOCATION Renton 1 Washl~ton DATE STARTED 10/14115 COMPLETED 10/14/15 GROUND ELEVATION TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION - LOGGED BY KOH CHECKED BY KOH AT END OF EXCAVATION -- NOTES Deoth of Toosoil & Sod 6": duff AFTER EXCAVATION -- ill "-(.) ::c /: ffi ui fus w"' u :i: (!) TESTS "-o MA TE RIAL DESCRIPTION .., :;; ui ~.., C "-:::, :j :;; z (!) ;Ji n tfPSL ~-~ 0.5 Brown TOPSOIL, roots to 3.5' Brown silty SAND, loose to medium dense, dry to damp (Weathered Till) -. -trace gravel, iron oxide staining -. MC =4.20% SM -becomes brown silty sand with gravel, medium dense, moist MC= 9.20% . _L -becomes gray, dense (unweathered till) 5.5 -no cementation MC= 8.80% Test pit terminated at 5.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 5.5 feet. Appendix B Laboratory Test Results ES-3613 Earth Solutions NW, LLC • Earth Solutions NW GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION 1805-136th Place N.E., Suite 201 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone: 425-284-3300 CLIENT Stein Skattum PROJECT NUMBER ES-3613 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I 6 43 2 1 '-1 1A1/23JBJ46 100 95 i 90 85 80 75 70 i \ \ I ! I I I I I I i ! ' I \ I I 65 • f-- I Cl 60 iii ,:: I i >-55 al 0:: w 50 z u: f--45 i I I I i z w u 40 0:: I w Q. 35 30 25 20 15 10 I 5 0 I I 100 10 PROJECT NAME 172nd St Subdivision PROJECT LOCATION Renton U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 810 1416 20 30 40 50 60 100140200 I ' I' ! I I ! 'I c i\ I ' I\ \I I \ t\ I i !, \ ,, I I~ \ I ' I 0 I I i\ I I I I I\ ~ I I, I \ \ I ~ c-~-\ I i I \i I '\I 1 I I -r 1 I I 1 0.1 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS i I I ' I ' i i I : ' I i. ! i i 'I I I 'I I I ' I I I , I I 11 ! I I ' I I .JJ . 111 0.01 0.001 --------------------------------------------~ I COBBLES GRAVEL SAND coarse fine coarse medium fine SILT OR CLAY ~1----------~-----------------------------r--~---1 ai Specimen Identification Classification Cc Cu ~1--,;....c-'-------'--'------'-'--'--'---+---------------'-_:___::_=:.c.:_ ____________ J-'=-=..-l--='-l • TP-2 2.0ft. USDA: Brown Very Gravelly Sandy Loam. uses: SM with Gravel. 5Hf---------f-------------''------=---~-'-----------------t---l----t " 111 TP-5 4.0ft. USDA: Brownish Gray Slightly Gravelly Fine Sandy Loam. uses: SM. 5Hf--------+-----------=------'~~--~----~--------f----+----l ~ "' TP-6 6.0ft. USDA: Gray Slightly Gravelly Loam. uses: Sandy ML. I i c,Hl-'-------'--+------'-''-----'-'--'"--'-'-----'-'-=="'--=.::.c:.c__:_=::,__=_:_----+-. --l---1 ~aif---t--------+--------~ ---+-l- ~l--,''----,----=---+---------r----~---------~--~---'--,-~---1 ~ Specimen Identification %Silt I %Clay ~ • TP-2 2.0ft. 20.3 D100 D60 D30 D10 LL PL ' Pl I I 37.5 1.008 0.149 19 0.193 I 19 ' ! ! I I I i"i III TP-5 4.0ft. 37.6 0t---f---------l------+----+-----l-----+---!-------1----------' ~ "' TP-6 6.0ft. 61.7 ,)j'l---+---------+------+----+------·------+-----l----+---1-'-----'-'----l ~1--t---------+-----+----+------+------"---+---+----l-------- "~+--------~--------+-----'------+----'----'---~---------' EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY Report Distribution ES-3613 Mr. Stein Skattum P.O. Box 769 Renton, Washington 98057 Mark Travers Architect 2315 East Pike Street Seattle, Washington 98122 Attention: Mr. Mark Travers, AIA Earth Solutions NW, LLC Renton Special Care munity 17033 108'h Avenue SE Renton, WA 98157 Site Plan & Conditional Use Submittal Materials iPtl\· ~)HI'·' 32. Letter of Understanding Geological Risk {5~r,0) n MAGNET design +development December 21, 2016 To: From: City of Renton Kevin Carl Project Director RE: Renton Special Care Community 17033 1081h Street SE Renton, WA 98157 Subject: Letter of Understanding of Geologic Risk I as the Owners representative for this project understand there are inherent risks whenever soil, geologic or hydrogeologic conditions are involved with a construction project. Soil and geologic materials, including groundwater are variable in nature. Geologic conditions vary vertically, laterally, and seasonally. The site soil is proven to be suitable to support foundations, landscaping, pavement, and other associated infrastructure in the area. However, the site soil also required careful planning and consideration with respect to design and construction. I/we understand, accept the risk and solely responsible of developing this property. Signed: Kevin Carl Nam~ Date: \ 'l 1 1-1 · J k 206.778.4726 kevin@magnet-dd.com 1631 15th Avenue W, Suite #211, Seattle.WA 98119 Renton Special Care Community 17033 1081" Avenue SE Renton, WA 98157 Site Plan & Conditional Use Submittal Materials 33.1 Utilities Plan, Preliminary Underground Power, Cable and Telecom Kevin Carl From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Categories: Hi Ann, Daniel Westley <dwestley@ldccorp.com> Tuesday, January 17, 2017 2:58 PM Ann Fowler 'Elkin, Brad'; Kevin Carl; Clark Close; robert@awaelec.com Underground Power Routing -Renton Special Care Community 16-137 _UndergroundPowerExhibit.pdf Red Category I met with PSE Project Manager, Brad Elkin, onsite on Thursday 1/12 to discuss the underground power design. The feasibility of continued underground power (south of the subject property crossing SE 172°' St) was discussed and concluded to be economically infeasible for reasons listed below. Please reference the attached Existing and Proposed Power Plan, Figure 1.A, for evaluation purposes. As a disclaimer, I'm attempting to summarize the information presented to me in our meeting to the best of my ability. For additional and specific information, Brad can be contacted directly at: Brad Elkin, Assoc. Project Manager, Puget Sound Energy, 425-495-6489 Cell, Bradley.elkin@pse.com email. Continued underground power infeasibility (as discussed with PSE): 1. Infeasible routing -horizontal curve of 108th AVE SE and location of pole (east side of 108'h) doesn't allow efficient routing design and would require a ROW power vault "the size of a car" 2. Power Pole Anchorage -anchorage to the subject power pole would be in the middle of 108th Way SE in order to counter the opposing powerline tension forces 3. Power Outages -power outages would be required for this type of installation The attached underground power plan is the most sensible solution for providing underground power along the property frontage. Please review and provide additional commentary or concurrence as an email response. Thank you. Dan Daniel E. Westley, PE Design Engineer LDC, Inc The Civil Engineering Group T425.806.1869 Ext.126 WE MOVED! 20210 142nd Ave NE Woodinville, WA 98072 www.LDCcorp.com dwestley@ldccorp.com "Engineering ABOVE the Standard" From: Ann Fowler [mailto:AFowler@Rentonwa.gov] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 9:38 AM To: Daniel Westley Subject: RE: Underground Power 1 The lines would need to be underground across 172'' and connect to the pole at the corner. -Thanks Ann Fowler Civil Engineer II J CED AFowler@Rentonwa.gov J Phone: (425) 430-7382 ~ Please consider the environment before printing this email From: Daniel Westley [mailto:dwestley@ldccorp.com) Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 2:29 PM To: Ann Fowler <AFowler@Rentonwa.gov> Subject: Underground Power Hi Ann, Can you review the attached underground power plan? I will need to know the extent of where to terminate the underground power on the south end of 1081h, as we are meeting with the EE and PSE onsite tomorrow afternoon. Do we need to cross SE 172'' with underground power? Just FYI, we pushed back tomorrow's scheduled submittal to next Thursday 1/19. Originally, I was planning on getting this feedback at our intake meeting tomorrow, but will need some input via phone call if ok. I'll try calling you to discuss. Thank you for the help! Dan Daniel E. Westley, PE Design Engineer LDC, Inc The Civil Engineering Group T 425.806.1869 Ext.126 WE MOVED! 20210 142nd Ave NE Woodinville, WA 98072 www.LDCcorp.com dwestley@ldccorp.com "Engineering ABOVE the Standard" 2 2 I • ~ ~ "' -~ " f f l i -i £ §' [ I i 0 ~ g ,I! . )> { l ~ RENTON SPECIAL CARE COMMUNITY f:XI STING ANO PROPOSE:O POWER MAP Re~idential W,!01 ..... -k,.,sD P,, ~Z1.-.1a1 ---n•.YMtM'.112 ""cn . .-n.291Q Kl'Ki GCUm GIS CCM"cx.RS GEJERAlED FROM &:.RE EivUH LOAR (Kt,lj CWN!Yj Tl-IS ~T-' HAS A S1',TID VERTv.t. ..CC~CY Of APl·'ROXNAIELY 1 FOO r. ,,. - I 0 ---·--·-N'l1d SJ/lflllfl 03Z/7V'tJJ r;r;OB6 r':M 'NOiNJtf 'JS JA Ir' Hi [Of I AllNnririOO 3~ 1VI03dS NO!N~ 011 'AllVllnVIIVIIOO ~ lV103dS N01N3~ JAN 1 9 2017 I C,1' . (, ·~ I .. / ! I I I .. SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRICT 14616 S.E. 192nd St. • P.O. Box 58039 • Renton, WA 98058-1039 • Phone (253) 630-9900 • Fax (253) 630-5289 December 29, 2016 Dan Westley 20210 142nd Ave NE Woodinville, WA 98072 Re: Renton Special Care Community Parcel No. 008700 0285 and 0293 Dear Developer, Enclosed are the Certificates of Water and Sewer Availability for the above project that you requested. If you have not had a chance to visit our web site yet I would recommend you and your Engineer review the Development information we have available at www.sooscreek.com, then click on New Connections. We have all of our design requirements, plan examples and specs and standards on the site for your reference. When you are ready, your next step is to submit a site plan of your project and schedule a pre-application meeting with the District. I have enclosed our Process and Timeframe Sheet for your reference. If you have any questions, please call (253) 630-9900 extension 107. Sincerely, Darci Mattioda Supervisor, Development Administration Soos Creek Water and Sewer District Dmattioda@sooscreek.com 253-630-9900 Ext. 107 www.sooscreek.com 1a 1b 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 -OOS CREEK WATER AND SEWER DIST Process and Time Frames for Development Projects Process Time Frame Inquiry Meetings -Allow up to 10 days Foe those who are looking to buy/sell property, have failing septic tanks, additions ta homes or buildings 1 SFR may want to consider developing and don't have development plans at the time of the meetina. Oeveloners-see #2. Apply for Sewer I Water Availability-Up to 1 0 biz days For anvone who needs to obtain a water or sewer certificate of availabilitv. REQUIRED -Pre-Application/Pre-Design MeeUng -1-2 weeks to Discuss water/sewer availability, route, design standards & requirements with customer schedule with all before they proceed with their project plans. An Engineering Representative will be present at parties. the meeting. The meeting fee is $250 due at the time of the meeting. Developer Extension Application ~ 2 weeks to get the The developer submits preliminary civil paper plans and an ACAD disk to our office with an DE quote back application. The District's engineering office will review the plans and prepare a Developer Extension Agreement quote and list the permits that will be required. The quote will be given to the developer and the developer can request in writing if they would !Ike to proceed with a contract. No major plan review wrn be done at this poinl Enter into a DE (Developer Extension) Agreement -Allow one week A DE agreement is a contract with the District that allows a developer to install mainline and from the day the connect to our system. Once the District has a signed DE agreement on file, the District will District receives a begin reviewing project plans and prepare the red [ine comments. written request Plan Review· 4 weeks to receive When the developer's engineer has preliminary plans ready they should be submitted to the red lines from the District with 2 sets of paper plans and 1 ACAD disk of the plans. The District's consulting District. engineers will review the plans and mark up the red lines. In addition, they will add MH #'s, as built# s and easement #s. Optional Red Line Review Meeting• 4 weeks ta receive When preliminaries are turned in to the District they will be reviewed and red lined by the red lines from the District Engineers, !hen a meeting can be set up with the developer and their engineer to District. review the red line plans. The red line meeting is an optional meeting and may be skipped if an engineer is familiar with the District's design standards and red line procedures. Final Plans-Timing is up to the Signed, final plans should be provided to the District after all revisions to the preliminaries developer's engineer have been reso[ved. The District will require 10 full size copies of the plans and 2 % size {11 x 17) copies of the plans. You will also want to make copies to give to the contractors and for any permit applications that your project will require, we do not need plans on mylar. Permits for Mainline Construction• 2 -4 weeks for most Permits need to be obtained by the developer's engineer. Permit applications, along with permits, some approved plans, and traffic control plans if required, should be submitted to the District for permits may take signatures and will be mailed to the permitting agency by SCWSD. Original permits will be longer to receive. returned to the District office. Permits are required before a preconstruction meeting can be scheduled. All permit fees will be invoiced to the project plus 20%. Pre-Construction Meet Ing with the District-1-2 weeks to A preconstruction meeting will be scheduled after all requirements are received by the schedule with all District. 2nd Half fees must be received prior ta, or at the beginning of the meeting, or parties. the meetina will be canceled. Survey/Staking~ 3-5 days after The District Engineer will do vertical datum, site benchmark and 1st run of sewer main and survey request has manhole verification survey. been received. Construction and Job Inspections-Varies by the job Includes all inspections, sewer TV, and punch list items to meet District standards. Once all standards are met the field inspector will issue a completion memo to the District office staff and only then can they start the Bill of Sale and closing documents. Bill of Sale and Closing Documents -4 weeks from Required closing documents include Bil! of Sale, contractors release, engineer's release, Inspectors paving deposit. value of systems form completed with back up invoices (will be used to completion memo determine Latecomer's amount), final compaction tests, easements, latecomers/special connection charges. and all invoices paid to date, Additional documents may be required. CRD's, as-builts and the On-From-To will be prepared by the District based on the field and ""'' --·-- Side Sewer/Meter Permits-1 -2 weeks after GFC's (general facilities charges}, permit fees and O.M.D. (Operations, Maintenance and closing documents - Depreciation) will be due at the time of application. Permits are only issued after the District receives all closing documents. "PLEASE REFER TO THE DE AGREEMENT FOR ADDJTIONAL INFORMATION ON EACH STEP J j\ \ ';-, 1: Cost Who Pays? No charge SCWSD . $100 each utility Developer $ 250 per hour Developer $1,000 per utility Developer Intake Fee Varies by project. Developer See DE for fees. 1st review cycle District/ paid by the Developer District See DE for additional fees. S 250 per hour Developer See DE for fees Developer District will Developer Invoice permit amount plus 20% See DE for fees Developer See DE for fees DistricV Developer See DE for fees Developer See DE for fees Developer See DE for fees Developer or Builder 9/3/2015 / CASH RECEIPT ------------------------ Cb~1ro~ D'B~S ~ Daa3 19217 Date );)/ ct :f. 20 J VJ Received From 1 0 oc2 _de' -el b\2v'.YB'7J.-C<Y?Wcl l--OJ11; ) LLG Address )Uo!b\ },,It; ~-, Sr 5Ae, t Df.Y' ,9 ~I D ) U;;;> V1 cl A..g b.1:t5 Dollars$ o2)D. 0{) For L0 &: S Cec-bh< o.-te:s 6b f\va .'Io L.>,. It -4./ Water Cash D Check~ ,, 11 '2<-n-lon Me«"-" '1S C o.. LO_. ~ ,·· ·.· ,.· ... ._. ~ Hr OA~c.,.--1 f' ~ r A .5 f: f'.1:<, l)-,.~I\J W"!: 1tt R,~ C.J:.f: ~ , ,U,N I fi 201? This certificate provides information necessary to evaluate development proposals. Certificate : 4684 SOOS CREEK WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY Type: Rezone or other : Applicant1s Name: Dan Westley Proposed Use: Renton Special Care Community Location: Lot: 14 Block: 4 Development: AKERS FARMS 5 Parcel: 008700 0285 Address: 17037 Henson Rd. S Information: Also includes parcel 008700 0293. Existing home/account on file with the District. WATER PURVEYOR INFOIL1\1A TION I. a Water will be provided by service connection only to an existing Null water main, Null feet from the site. b Water service will require an improvement to the water system of: 2 •• b 3. • b 4. ' Water service to the proposed plat will require the installation of onsite water main. Final water layout and requirements will be determined based on final site development plan and Fire Marshal requirements. All plans must be approved by City of Renton and Soos Creek Water and Sewer District The water system is in confonnance with a County approved water comprehensive plan. The water system improvement will require a water comprehensive plan amendment. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the district or city, or is within the County approved service area of a private water purveyor. Annexation or Boundary Review Board approval will be necessary to provide service. Water is/or will be available at the rate of flow and duration indicated below at no less than 20 psi measured at the nearest fire hydrant 5 feet from the buLlding/property {or as marked on the attached map): Rate of Flow: 1,000 gpm Duration: 2 hours b Water system is not capable of providing fire flow. 5. Service is subject to the following: a Connection Charge: Yes b Easement (s): Yes, for all main not in the right of way. ' Other: A water abandonment permit needs to be purchased for home removal. Cross Connection Control devices must be in conformance with state laws. Service is subject to the applicants agreement to comply and perform to make such installation and/or connections to the standards, regulations, requirements and conditions of this District and such other agency or agencies having jurisdiction. This District is not representing that its facilities will be extended or otherwise modified to make such setvice available to the applicant. It is the responsibility of the applicant to make any required extension of facilities to serve their property. [ hereby certlfy that the above water purveyor information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year-from dale of signature. SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRICT ------ Ag.ency 1''1me Supervisor, Development Administration ---~le --·----- Darci Mattioda Signatory Name l2/29/2016 "'" J/-\N I !: ,.. ' ,. ~ /: /. This certificate prtwides information necessary to evaluau development proposals. Certificate : SOOS CREEK WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT CERTIFICATE OF SEWER AVAILABILITY Type: Rezone or other Applicant's Name: Dan Westley Proposed. Use: Renton Special Care Community Location: Lot: 14 Block: 4 Development: AKERS FARMS 5 Parcel: 008700 0285 Address: 17037 BENSON RDS, RENTON 5685 Information: Also includes parcel 008700 0293. Existing home/account on file with the District. SEWER PURVEYOR INFORMATION All buildings outlets must go directly into a manhole. I, a Sewer service will be provided by service connection only to an existing sewer main Null feet from the site and the sewer system has the capacity to serve the proposed area. 0 Other (describe): Sewer service to the proposed plat will require the installation of onsite sanitary sewer main. Final sewer layout will be determined based on final site development plans, building locations and outlet elevations. All plans must be approved by the City of Renton and Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. 11le sewer system is in conformance with a County approved sewer comprehensive plan. b The sewer system improvement will require a sewer comprehensive plan amendment The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the district or city. b Annexation or Boundary Review Board approval will be necessary to provide service, or sign a Power of Attorney for annexation. 4. Service is subject to the following: {;) Connection Charge: Yes c;) Easement (s): Yes, for all main not in the right of,way {lJ Other: A cap off permit needs to be purchased for the home removal. Service is subject to the applicants agreement to comply and perform to make such installation and/or connections to the standards, regulations, requirements and conditions of this District and such other agency or agencies having jurisdiction. This District is not representing that it's facilities will be extended or otherwise modified to make such service available to the applicant. It is the responsibility of the applicant to make any required extension of facilities to serve their property. I hereby certify that the above sewer purveyor information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRJCT Agency Name Supervisor, Development Administratio~ Title Darci Mattioda 12/29/2016 ,;'; i.'-·" ' \ J/\ N ' " , ,, ' o i iJ "/..1,',I/ LDC Memo TI-IE CIVIL ENGINEERING GROUP To: Kevin Carl Commercial Infrastructure Residential From: Daniel E. Westley, EIT Mark Villwock, PE CC: File Date: June 21, 2016 Re: Renton Cottage Special Care Community ''\N. ,JI, . ). ,-3 . , , / The following information is a summary of the site planning requirements and the site plan engineering requirements for this site. The infonmation within is intended to be a summary of all critical design elements for forthcoming design as well as an estimate of material quantities for critical site civil work. The summary of requirements are in reference to the City of Renton's Pre-application Meeting Comments for The Cottage Special Care Community (PRE16-000116) prepared by the City of Renton on March 3'd, 2016. It shall be known that not all design requirements and elements of design have been summarized within the findings described below. Shall additional information be needed or further clarified, please refer to the pre-application meeting comments. SEWER • Service Provider: Soos Creek Water • Sewer will be served from sewer main located in SE 172nd ST WATER • Service Provider: Soos Creek Water • Loop through the site will be required to connect to water main in 1oath Ave SE and SE 172nd ST TRANSPORTATION/ROW DEDICATION • SE 172nd St classification: Commercial mixed use and industrial access street • SE 172nd St ROW dedication: 4.5 feet (69 feet ROW width required) • 1 oath Ave SE classification: Minor Arterial Road • 1 oath St SE ROW dedication: 15.5' (91 feet ROW width required) • Driveway setback off property line: 5' minimum • Will need to work with the City on the Road transition to existing on SE 172nd Street Engineering ABOVE the Standard 0 0 ; 0 N .,. June 21, 2016 Page 2 of 3 PLANNING • Zoning R-14 • Building Lot Coverage<65% (at around 30%) • Impervious Surface Coverage<80% (Current site plan is under 80%) • Minimum Street Setback (SE 172nd ST): 15' • Minimum Street Setback (108th AVE SE): 15' FIRE ACCESS • Fire access road minimum width: 20' J'.r, .. !\. ·, • '~ ; i) I . • Fire access inside turning radius: 25' • Fire access outside turning radius: 45' EARTHWORKS AND GRADING • Estimated Excess material Quantity: 2,000 Bank CY (will try and balance as closely as possible but appears we will have excess material. Will use tall foundations to take up grade along SE 172nd ST. • Estimate Wall Quantity: 800 SF (face of fill wall) o Building permit required for sections of wall exceeding 4' in height STORMWATER • Proposed Detention System: 425 LF of 96" Diameter Detention Pipe • Detention Discharge Conveyance: extends 120' beyond site along SE 172nd ST • Water Quality Proposed: o Type: Stormfilter 96" MH with (12) 27" cartridges o Location: Upstream of detention facility o Additional water quality treatment facility may needed for detention/WQ bypass if WQ trade becomes unattainable. Additional offsite survey may be necessary to determine WQ trade feasibility. • Shall conform to the City of Renton 2009 Surface Water Design Manual • Geotechnical infiltration testing required for proof of LID infeasibility (if determined infeasible) • Onsite Flow Control BMPs must conform to the Large Lot High Impervious standard as outlined in the 2009 KCSWDM section 5.2.1.3. Additional engineering design and planning is required to meet this requirement. PARKING • Required Number of Spaces: 34 • Modification allowance: 25% Reduction • Required spaces with Mod: 26 • Provided Spaces: 26 o Compact Required: 6 Spaces o Compact Provided: 7 Spaces o Required ADA Stalls: 2 Spaces Engineering ABOVE the Standard 0 C June 21, 2016 Page 3 of 3 o Provided ADA Stalls: 2 Spaces PEDESTRIAN ACCESS • Pedestrian Access: from 108'h AVE SE LANDSCAPING • Interior landscaping (Nonresidential Development in a Residential Zone): 10' wide fully sight obscuring landscaped visual barrier required along common property lines • Street Frontage Landscaping required: 1 O' • 15 SF of interior parking lot landscaping per parking space or 26 Stalls x 15 SF /Stalls = 390 SF SIGNIFICANT TREE PRESERVATION • Significant trees retention minimum: 20% • Arborist to determine significant trees in good health • The administrator may authorize the planting of replacement trees on site if it can be demonstrated to the Administrator's satisfaction that an insufficient number of trees can be retained FEES • Transportation Impact Fee: $494. 92/bed and $9.39/SF OR fee calculated per the ITE manual • Fire Impact Fee: $5.56/SF for medical care facility • There will be other water, sewer and permit fees. These can be quantified if requested. Please feel free to request additional findings if need be. As always, please call or email with any questions or concerns you may have regarding this information. Regards, Mark Villwock, PE LDC, Inc. Engineering ABOVE the Standard 2 3 u NE 1l40FTHESW1l4ANDSE 114 OF THE NW 114, SEC2a, TWN29, RGE5E, KJNGCOUNTY, WASHINGTON t ........ ""'"" JfJZf() 1-mDAIOU IIC ~~-71 (:DlltltCt:i«Ml. rllR!llfT.AS ~(.,r.,Ja-,aa F.U: (m) "'1-l#J °'4L:~t:MI -.Dt!iDIITTM«:H:Crnl!t/lMJ ~P.S n»w,rr •r ~ *SH#fifON llm1 cama: ltf.lHJI AIIOS PHOI£ (m) 111-4.JII l.lMl;.......,.._..,.,_., -~SlRVa~IC..tpg) Ja,(111"1fH/fitEM£ft:ST,Xm'A !l'JMIO!n •fll!ll?,,RI amrJt ~ MOflla. s. ,ua. ,r M:N; (4") «11-nt>I ~~-=-.... - ff---11CWIOIJWM:S(,IOT(l(.'M~ WI fililal..t: 009'.l'OOOffl,. OOl570Xl20J C111111 ma1c ~m sr (1.~1.te) .. oo::ci,Ql,W.t •;.c.'IT(U.10 ,t;) E' -#0 ,1,lSJ Y (IAO JC} D1sr1S a: SNU..fNII..Y IICSIEi".l,II. ""'9:D LE o:»MtCiCEII' (J)(]lJt -o:NJTICM,._ I.& CIJIFOf ... 11-1• OJIUI" CUI' P\Mt lt-1~ IIR2: S00$0!£() MilDI 6' SC'l(]l llfflllCT 8Jt SOOSCA£tl •TCR"-SOOIDISlllC -"" ... "" -""""""' ... """" !Q«JQ.Cl!SnEr.: IIIO(TON f 40.) FIi: CIIZm! IIEXTOH lllf"A ......... Klliltf!~' -JWllr. w -,a ... ' m:(MNgSIIIIJ) 1!1' ----..OIIINIMiClQ.alD:O Sl'l"fttR[[ ~fllO:OIIEUkllMf'Si MIIICll8IIIEICILIIIOBff ;):Jl;SfP£111.NT~•CRW(lll(:~lN'IS --.,. ...... L«CNJIIC: ~ ID'llliOIIGlt 4J,072Sf(l'O.<t(ll) D reM1.a ll.071 Sf LOl'o:JallCIE: l7.»8Sf (l03Si N:M( -Bl'O.M -.-QJID 1£1111: !11 !'# a.llD talOf! 1Cl ~ ~ 1.:i'§' ---"""'-' S~ llSUUS CllftO 111111 IUmtaL: a S!IIUl a AN.LI 11111D: 2 STM.1S ,..l"IDIIID: 2tstti5 Cllft0$UIJ.Jl'WOlal: 7 $!'.lrU.S a IDilJ IWMID: 2 stltil """"' ....... ...,,. /turiiO l f"?.J'f 0.&5"111'.,, {YPfiOfffW~(i ~. TAX PARC£L .OOB70002Bi rr•,\.[L;o; f~k~\: ' l I 0 E3 ........ "'""""' """"""' SnAf OIWI a.£.#1 /JUI' """"'"""""" 0 !Q:IJ'[lf';Q....., -=ll!lllllll"l!l.ln""'-" .! l j " i ;; • f f .1,'~Hf If" ~'{l'ft'.1t:..-i:) RENTON SPECIAL CARE COMMUNITY DRAINAGE CONTROL PLAN -1 ---------------------~SIC.IIIJ.:r.x, J 7:~/T?"",r f r, ~I ( :i !,,; f!C~~ f /f V'. ;i ~ f ~~-~ .... './.. /.i '!::'· ' ------ .... ~ .. .. ,.,,.,. .-""/7;--;T " k /! -;; .wv;. ;J ~ .. -........ ,.,._] ,H,Hh 1~·:;,;,;/:1,., r · ,· I ' ' \ ' oorr~~ rr-•10.3 , 1t () \ '-.-;-:·--;;~1 ,....,._ 1 ! 4 ,~ :~ ~I f Uti,: r , i IJ 'lttJ 1 ·1 11 Q 11 1 I If I -...I, .i 11 ~ ~ • :::::> "' ~ :E ~ ::E :E "' i O ~ ::E O :a:·~ I~ !I ..,j 3! ~ ~ 5 0 "<!!!: 0 w -,;:: ~ Q. (/) "' ~ z :::i !z ~ ~ I!:!~ Renton Special Care C nunity 17033 108'h Avenue SE Rento n, WA 98157 Site Plan & Conditional Use Submittal Materials ~ '( •-~, I '··• nt· .... -··.· ... 1 ,0, 1 ·"" ~ '{ ~. JAN 1 9 2017 t,nv u1-o. i .,.ON II ,_ .• 'l j Ft /\r\Jf'liiNG C/ViSION 35. Drainage Report Renton Special Care Community 17033 108TH AVE SE Renton, WA 98055 Permit: # Technical Information Report Prepared for Renton Special Care Community LLC (RSCC) 2731 77'h Ave SE, Ste #203 January 2017 Mercer Island, WA 98040 Prepared by LDC, Inc. 20210 142nd Ave NE Woodinville, WA 98072 (425) 806-1869 Job No: 16-137 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title 1 Project Overview 1-1 2 Conditions and Requirements Summary 2-1 3 Offsite Analysis 3-1 4 Flow Control/Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design 4-1 5 Conveyance System Analysis and Design 5-1 6 Special Reports and Studies 6-1 7 Other Permits 7-1 8 SWPPP Analysis and Design 8-1 9 Bond Quantities, Facility Summaries 9-1 10 Operations and Maintenance Manual 10-1 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW The Renton Special Care Community project proposes the construction of four cottages, three for resident housing and the fourth to act as the administration/ kitchen building. Approximately 50,000 SF of impervious surface and roughly 21,000 SF of pervious surface is proposed onsite and within the Right-of-Way frontage. The proposed development proposes four convalescent buildings, access drive aisles, parking, associated utilities and ROW improvements on a 1.65 acre site. The subject property is located on parcels 0087000285 and 0087000293 at 17033 1081h Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98055. Access to the proposed project will be gained from the south and east via SE 172nd St and 1081h Ave SE respectively. The subject property is comprised of two parcels, one is currently developed with a vacant single-family residence, associated driveway and landscaped areas and the other parcel is undeveloped with moderate to dense vegetation. Site soils are dense to very dense Vashon Till, exhibiting low infiltration rates. Existing grades across the property are moderate across most the site, ranging from 2 to 25%, sloping mainly from the northeast to the southwest. Runoff from the site currently flows to the southwest and exits the subject property at the southwest corner of the site, entering the municipal storm drainage system located in SE 172nd ST. Downstream flows eventually outlet into the Black River, a tributary of the Duwamish River. A lot combination will be completed to combine the two parcels to one. Offsite frontage clearing activities will result in additional disturbed area impacts to the site. See Developed Hydrology Map, Figure 4.2 for a graphical depiction of the proposed development. This report and calculations were produced in accordance with the 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual and the 2017 City of Renton Surface Water Design Manual (2017 City of Renton SWDM). Technical Information Report 1-1 LDC Job No. 16-137 LDC THE CIVIL ENGINEERING GROUP 20210142nd Avenue NE WoodlnvDle, WA 98072 VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" =2000' Engineering Structural Planning Survey Ph. 425.806.1869 Fx. 425.482.2893 RENTON SPECIAL CARE COMMUNITY · · ' -·--~---www:~c~~:com ---. --.. ---VACINITY UAP -;;_ ____ --.:..-.:::;_ ----...... :JQ1 -~ ....... - l«Td 10IJIN(X) 19"71 ,qogs VM 'NOlNJ~ JS 31V ffOLt AllNnlr'llr'IOO :ruvo lVIO" .. s NOlN3l:l :m 'A.Ul'lnl'll'IOO ~ 1'1103dS NO.l.N~ ' ! ! l!IBII! II II I! : : : I j: t ! • oO ; I! I .-1 'JI .... ,, i ~ II ' ~ 0:: i ... ,_ ___ ""'"'"""""' ............ ...,\',•••'-"""' ..... --1,<1--t<\oLO,\;< - 2 Conditions and Requirements Summary This report was produced in accordance with the 2017 City of Renton Surface Water Design Manual (2017 City of Renton SWDM). Per Chapter I of the Manual, the proposed development requires a Full Drainage Review, meeting all nine core requirements as well as all five special requirements, since there will be more than 2,000 square feet of new impervious surfaces and more than 7,000 sf of land disturbing activities. A summary of how each of the minimum requirements is met is described in this section. Core Requirement #1: Discharge at the Natural Location: The existing site runoff discharges the site along the southern and western property boundaries. All site runoff ends up in a roadside ditch located on the north end of SE 172nd ST. In the developed condition all runoff will be conveyed to the previously described natural discharge location. Core Requirement #2: Offsite Analysis: No discernable upstream run-off flows onto the subject property. Onsite runoff discharges as concentrated flow into a roadside ditch and culvert located in the southwest corner of the property. Downstream flows are conveyed in the westerly direction through a series of roadside ditch, culvert, storm pipe, catch basins and natural and engineered drainage swales. No signs of constrictions, capacity issues, erosion or sedimentation were noted along the downstream investigation. See Off site Analysis in Section 3 of this report. Core Requirement #3: Flow Control: Historic site conditions, assuming all forested, must be used for the predeveloped conditions. Flow control will be provided by a detention pipe facility located beneath the parking and access drive aisle along the western and northern property boundaries. See Flow Control/Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design, section 4 of this report for additional information. Technical Information Report 2-1 LDC Job No. 16-137 Core Requirement #4: Conveyance System: The new pipe system for this project will be sized to meet the 100-year peak flows. See Conveyance System Analysis and Design, section 5, for additional information regarding conveyance analysis and conveyance capacity. Core Requirement #5: Erosion and Sediment Control: See SWPPP Analysis and Design, Section 8 of this Report for the SWPPP BMP Elements. Core Requirement #6: Maintenance and Operations: The stormwater detention and water quality facilities will be maintained by the property owner. An emergency access easement will be granted to the City of Renton. See Operations and Maintenance in Section 10 of this report. Core Requirement #7: Financial Guarantees and Liability: Any required performance or assurance bonds will be posted with the City as required. Core Requirement #8: Water Quality: Based on the 2017 City of Renton SWDM, this project must meet the requirements of the Enhanced Basic Water Quality Treatment. The proposed enhanced treatment facility is a Filterra Bioretention Systems as approved by the City of Renton Public Works Department Blanket Adjustment dated June 26th, 2014. See Flow Control/Water Quality Analysis and Design in Section 4 of this report for additional information. Core Requirement #9: On-site BMPs: The 2017 City of Renton SWDM requires that all target surfaces must provide onsite BMPs to the maximum extent feasible to mitigate impacts of increased stormwater surface runoff per Large Lot BMP Requirements, section C.1.3.2. Permeable Pavement is the only feasible BMP applied to the site per section C.2.7, satisfying the onsite BMP requirements. Additionally all pervious surfaces will be protected in accordance with the soil amendment BMP detailed in Appendix C, Section C.2.1.3. See Flow Control/Water Quality Analysis and Design in Section 4 of this report for additional information. Technical Information Report 2-2 LDC Job No. 16-137 Special Requirement #1: Other Adopted Area-Specific Requirements: There are no Critical Drainage Areas, Master Drainage Plans, Basin Plans, Salmon Conservation Plans, Stormwater Compliance Plans, Lake Management Plans, Flood Hazard Reduction Plan Updates, or Shared Facility Drainage Plans within the vicinity of this project. Therefore, this requirement does not apply to the project. Special Requirement #2: Flood Hazard Area Delineation: Per the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map 53033C0979 F, the site is located in Zone C corresponding to an area outside of the 500-year flood plain. Therefore, there are no flood hazard areas (100-year floodplains, zero-rise flood fringe, zero-rise floodway, FEMA floodway, or channel migration zones) on or adjacent to this site. Therefore, this requirement does not apply to the project. Special Requirement #3: Flood Protection Facilities: There are no levees or revetments on or adjacent to this site. Therefore this requirement does not apply to the project. Special Requirement #4: Source Controls: Source controls are not required for this type of commercial site. Special Requirement #5: Oil Control: Only industrial sites are defined as high-use sites. This requirement does not apply to the proposed project. Technical Information Report 2-3 LDC Job No. 16-137 3.0 OFFSITE ANALYSIS Task 1. Study Area Definition and Maps King County LiDAR, survey, and 2012 aerial photography were the best topographical references available for the area containing the site. The limits of downstream analysis extended roughly 0.25 miles from the site's natural discharge location. Please reference Task 3 below for a detailed description of the downstream flow path (See Figure 3.0 Downstream Analysis Map). Task 2. Resource Review All of the resources below have been reviewed for existing and potential issues near the project site: • Adopted Basin Plans No Adopted Basin Plans were located that include the project site. • Drainage Basin This site is located within the Panther Creek drainage sub basin. The sub basin flows are tributary to the Black River and ultimately to the Duwamish River. • Floodplain / Floodway (FEMA) maps According to FEMA mapping this project is not within a floodplain. • Sensitive Areas Sensitive areas are not located on the site. • Drainage Complaints and Studies According to email correspondence with Ann Fowler, on 10/13/2017, there are not any drainage complaints of concern in or near the subject property's downstream flow path. • Road Drainage Problems No issues were identified near the proposed site. Technical Information Report 3-1 LDC Job No. 16-137 • Wetland Inventory Maps There are no wetland areas located on or downstream of the proposed subject property. This has been verified in the critical areas study as completed by others • Section 303d List of Polluted Waters The proposed subject property is not tributary to any 303d listed waters within 1/,i of a mile from the subject property. • Stormwater Compliance Plans Not applicable to the proposed project. Task 3. Field Inspection On Tuesday December 6th, 2016 upstream and downstream analyses were performed at the site. The following observations were verified during this visit. Please refer to Figure 3.0, Downstream Analysis Map, for reference locations. Upstream Analysis As observed on December 6th, 2016 site visit, there is no discernable upstream flow entering the proposed site. Downstream Analysis Runoff from the subject property discharges the site at the southwest property boundary and enters a 12" concrete driveway culvert located on the northern side of SE 172nd St. Flows continue westward through the roadside ditch and are redirected southerly, crossing SE 172nd St via a 12" concrete culvert, and are discharged into an open densely vegetated parcel to the south. Flows then enter an 18 inch concrete culvert, flow westerly, crossing State Route 515 Benson Dr. S, and are discharged into an engineered open channel located on a private parcel. Open channel flows are mitigated via 12"+ riprap and flows enter an 18" PVC pipe. Tightlined flows are conveyed westerly via 18" PVC pipe along 5 36th St., crossing the 1/,i mile downstream analysis extent boundary. Technical Information Report 3-2 LDC Job No. 16-137 ~ -~ " f "ti tn (-') c,, :;: .,I ~ ~ ! ii .5-a "-.. , • if Jt r I } I i f ! ~ ~I ! Cl RENTON SPECIAL CARE CO UNITY DOWNS TR EAM YS/S MAP Infrastru ct ure Residential 1•;.)1l'<ll!xioo.t,a.t.."'10. ........ 2,.-.,., SOURCE INFOR MATION ~CE AGENCY I DESCRIPfON o:_ry __ Of: RENT~ QS p~ca 30.,!t&\Ri KJ~ covm as I~~-~=:«. ~~~n, nts DATA H.t.S .-. sr.-.TH> vanc..M. K,Ct.FJC'r OF .'.?POOX.MA.ffiY t F'OOT ~ESS K tiPW. tWGERY .,._,,.,.no.w,,.wor:_l~-h.U'J ...i.2"3 1 _l. ------'-------- Image 1: Downstream flow conveyed in SE 172nd St roadside ditch Image 2: Concentrated flows are discharged from 18" concrete culvert crossing Benson Dr S (State Route 515) into an open channel heading westward Te chnica l Informati on Re po r t 3-3 LDC Job No. 16-137 Image 3 : Open channel flows are mitigated with riprap and collected and conveyed westward via 18 " PVC storm drain pipe Ima ge 4: Downstream flows are conveyed westerly through a series of catch basins and 18" storm drain pipe located in S 36th St, crossing the v.i mile downstream analysis extent threshold Technical Information Re port 3-4 LDC Job No. 16-137 4.0 FLOW CONTROL/WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN The flow control and water quality requirements are identified in the 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual (2016 KCSWDM) and the 2017 City of Renton Surface Water De sign Manual. Pre-Developed Conditions: See the following page, Figure 4.1 Existing Hydrology Map, for a graphical depiction of the pre-developed hydrology. See below for the areas as modeled in WWHM4: Targeted Basin : Forested 1.65 Acres Total 1.65 Acres Developed Conditions: See the following page, Figure 4 .2 Developed Hydrology Map, for a graphical depiction of the developed hydrology. See below for the areas as modeled in WWHM4: Basin A (tributary to detention facility): Pervious landscape 0.22 Acres Impervious 1.00 Acres Total 1.22 Acres Pervious Pavement (tributary to detention facility): Pervious Pave 4,300 SF Total 0.10 Acres Detention Bypass: Pervious 0.26 Acres Impervious 0.07 Acres Total 0.33 Acres Techn ical Information Report 4-1 LDC Job No . 16-137 0; < & ' § c' " ~~~lli a ~ i ._ a ~~ f ~ ~ [ l ! & ~ ., t !. -· ~ , .. , RENTON SPECIAL CARE C( UNITY EXISTING HY OGYMAP LDC 14l'O'INC 2'00lfl:k.,11Dlil -..n...-.-n Commercial lnfrntructuAi Residential -~- LEGEMJ Sut/«<Propo/fy Plfcd&xnollrf Wat«c0tne Contoor, (UD AR) /\/ 10Foc<Cootoor /\.' 2FootCMloor ., S.C...~FHt "' DEVELOPED BASIN A TOTAL IMPERVIOUS r.OOAC UDPERIEAfUPAVEMENT 0./0AC nt.LGRASS = TOTAL• ROW COWTROLBYPASS J!Jl'fRVl()(JS 1.42AC NON-TARGE T /IIP€RVl00S SURFACE EXISnllG PAVEMENT 2,XXJSF TARGET SURFACE AREA BY/14SS ROW PAVEMEN T 1.100 SF PRIVATE DRfVE f'MVEMENT !JQilE TOTAL • 2,300 SF M'TIGATtoN TRAQE NET NON-TARGET(TO FC) 1,300S F TARGE T (IJYPASS} ~ TOTAL• p~ g§~j i§~ ~u~ i sn~~! ~ ~~hi ~ :f ~~~II :::, 1· 8 a l3 : ! ! ~ , ~~~ ; I:" ,o ~n IBI ~ 1l ~ u E 2 :2 r1 ~ E -• • 3j: l.)i 1l ~i !.1 I ....._,~ F .....i I ii -.J >-0.. "-( !::: ~ -:.: ,._ (.) :::, <!) LU..,,.~ a. -=: 0 Cl) ::E ~ ;: 0 i 0 (.) C> ._ IJJ ~ :.: a:: 3 LU -l" a:: 4.2 4. 1 Flow Control Facility Based on the City of Renton's flow control map and City of Renton Municipal Code 4- 6-030 .c., the site falls w ithin the Flow Control Duration Standard (for Forested Site Conditions). This is the equivalent of King County 's "Level 2 Conservation Flow Control Area". Flow control performance "shall match the predeveloped site's discharge duration for the discharge rates between fifty percent (50 %) of the two (2) year peak flow through the fifty (50) year peak flow and the two (2) and ten (10) year peak discharge assuming fores ted site conditions as the predeveloped site condition". The proposed detention pipe facility has been designed in accordance with the City of Renton SWDM design criteria in section 5.1.2.1, general requirements for Detention Tank s. Flow control compliance modeling and analysis has been assessed using WWHM 4 in accordance with the 2017 City of Renton SWDM section 5.1.2.2 . WWHM Modeled Detention Pipe Pipe Diameter: Pipe Length: Bottom of Pipe: Sediment Storage: Begin Live Storage : Live Storage Depth: Top of Riser Ele vation : Freeboard: Top of Pipe El evation: 8' 470' 390 .00 0.5' 391.50 7 .0' 398 .50 0.5' 399.00 See the following pag es for the WWHM 4 project report co ntaining prede ve loped and mitigated land us e desc ription, detention facility hydraulic table, predevelop ed and mitigated hydrology and release rates , and analysis passing r eport summary . Flow Control Mitigation Trade A flow control facility mitigation trade is utilized per 2017 City of Renton SWDM section 1.2.3 .2.G, Mitigation Trades. The project's onsite flow control facility has been designed to mitigate for an area of existing non-targeted impervious surface area located in th e 108th AVE SE frontage road in trade for not mitigating part of th e Techni cal Information Report 4-2 LDC Job No_ 16-13 7 project's targeted impervious surfaces that cannot be vertically routed to the proposed flow control fa cility. The target impe rvious surface areas being traded are a portion of the 108 th AVE SE ROW and a portion of the private drive aisle at the southwestern portion of the site. The proposed mitigation trade meets or exceeds conditions, #1 through #5, per section 1.2 .3.2.G. Mitigation trade proposals must be reviewed and approved with input from the City of Renton . Please see Figure 4.2, Developed Hydrology Map , for a graphical depiction of the proposed flow control mitigation trade areas . Additional target surfaces that cannot be routed to the onsite flow control facilities will be modeled in WWHM as bypass, per the conditions listed in the 2017 City of Renton SWDM section 1.2.3.2.E. Please see Figure 4 .2, Developed Hydrology Map, for a graphical depiction of the proposed flow control bypa ss areas . Techni c al Informat ion Re port 4-3 LDC Job No. 16-137 WWHM4 PROJECT REPORT Project Name: 20161230_ConstructionSizing Site Name: Site Address: City Report Date: 12/30/2016 Gage Sea tac Data Start: 1948/10/01 Data End : 1998/09/30 Precip Scale: 1.00 Version Date: 2015/12/15 Low Flow Threshold for POC 1 50 Percent of the 2 Year High Flow Threshold for POC 1: 50 year PREDEVELOPED LAND USE Name : Basin 1 Bypass: No GroundWater: No Pervious Land Use C, Forest, Flat Pervious Total Impervious Land Use Impervious Total Basin Total Element Flows To: Surface MITIGATED LAND USE Name : Basin 1 Bypass: No Groundwater: No Pervious Land Use Technical Information Report acre 1. 65 1. 65 acre 0 1.65 Inter flow acre 4-4 Groundwater LDC Job No. 16-137 C, Lawn, Flat Pervious Total Im;eervious Land Use ROADS FLAT ROOF TOl?S FLAT SIDEWALKS FLAT Impervious Total Basin Total Element Flows To: Surface Tank 1 .22 0.22 acre 0.34 0.49 0.17 1 1.22 Interflow Tank 1 Name Porous Pave::nent 1 Pavement Area: 0.1000 ft. Pavement Length: 66.00 ft. Pavement Width: 66.00 ft. Pavement slope 1: 0 To 1 Pavement thickness: 0.5 Pour Space of Pavement: 0.35 Material thickness of second layer: 2 Groundwater Pour Space of material for second layer: 0.35 Material thickness of third layer: 0 Pour Space of material for third layer: 0 Infiltration On Infiltration rate: 0.1 Infiltration safety factor: 1 Total Volume Infiltrated (ac-ft.): 12.079 Total Volume Through Riser (ac-ft.): 0 Total Volume Through Facility (ac-ft.): 12.079 Percent Infiltrated: 100 Total Precip Applied to Facility: 0 Total Evap From Facility: 0.931 Element Flows To: Outlet 1 Tank 1 Stag:e (feet) 0.0000 0.0333 0.0667 0.1000 0.1333 Porous Area(ac.) 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 Outlet 2 Pavement Hydraulic Table Vol.ume(ac-ft.) Discharg:e(cfs) 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.003 0.000 0.004 0.000 Technical Information Report 4-5 Infilt(cfs) 0.000 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 LDC Job No. 16-137 0. 16 67 0.100 0.005 0.000 0.010 0.2000 0.100 0.007 0.000 0.010 0.2333 0.100 0.008 0.000 0.010 0.2667 0.100 0.009 0.000 0.010 0.3000 0.100 0.010 0.000 0.010 0.3333 0.100 0. 011 0.000 0.010 0.3667 0.100 0.012 0.000 0.010 0.4000 0.100 0. 014 0.000 0.010 0.4333 0.100 0.015 0.000 0.010 0. 4 6 67 0.100 0.016 0.000 0.010 0.5000 0. 100 0.017 0.000 0.010 0.5333 0.100 0.018 0.178 0.010 0.5667 0.100 0.019 0. 252 0.010 0.6000 0.100 0.021 0.308 0.010 0.6333 0.100 0.022 0.356 0.010 0.6667 0.100 0. 02 3 0.398 0.010 0.7000 0.100 0. 024 0.436 0.010 0.7333 0.100 0.025 0 .471 0.010 0.7667 0.100 0.026 0.504 0.010 0.8000 0.100 0. 028 0.535 0.010 0.8333 0.100 0. 029 0. 5 64 0.010 0.8667 0.100 0.030 0.591 0.010 0.9000 0.100 0.031 0.617 0.010 0.9333 0.100 0.032 0.643 0.010 0.9667 0.100 0.033 0. 667 0.010 1.0000 0.100 0.035 0.690 0.010 1.0333 0.100 0.036 0. 713 0.010 1.0667 0.100 0.037 0.735 0.010 1.1000 0.100 0.038 0.756 0.010 1.1333 0.100 0.039 0.777 0.010 1.1667 0.100 0.040 0. 797 0.010 1.2000 0.100 0.042 0. 817 0.010 1.2333 0.100 0.043 0.836 0.010 1. 2 6 67 0.100 0.044 0.855 0.010 1.3000 0.100 0.045 0.873 0.010 1.3333 0.100 0. 04 6 0.891 0.010 1. 3667 0.100 0.047 0.909 0.010 1.4000 0.100 0.049 0.926 0.010 1.4333 0.100 0.050 0.943 0.010 1.4667 0.100 0.051 0. 960 0.010 1.5000 0.100 0.052 0.976 0.010 1.5333 0.100 0.053 0.993 0.010 1.5667 0.100 0.054 1.009 0.010 1.6000 0.100 0.056 1.024 0.010 1. 6333 0.100 0.057 1.040 0.010 1.6667 0. 100 0.058 1.055 0.010 1.7000 0.100 0.059 1. 070 0.010 1.7333 0.100 0.060 1. 08 4 0.010 1.7667 0.100 0.061 1.099 0.010 1.8000 0.100 0.063 1.113 0.010 J • 8333 0.100 0. 064 1.128 0.010 l.8667 0.100 0. 0 65 1.142 0.010 1.9000 0.100 0.066 1.155 0.010 1.9333 0.100 0.067 1.169 0.010 1.9667 0.100 0.068 1. 183 0.010 2.0000 0.100 0.070 1.196 0.010 2.0333 0.100 0. 071 1. 209 0.010 Technical Information Report 4-6 LDC Job No. 16-137 2.0667 0.100 0. 072 1. 222 0.010 2.1000 0.100 0.073 1.235 0.010 2. 1333 0.100 0.074 1.248 0.010 2.1667 0.100 0.075 1.261 0.010 2.2000 0.100 0. 077 1.273 0.010 2.2333 0.100 0.078 1.286 0.010 2.2667 0.100 0. 079 1. 298 0.010 2.3000 0.100 0.080 1.310 0.010 2.3333 0.100 0.081 1. 322 0.010 2.3667 0.100 0.082 1.334 0.010 2.4000 0.100 0.084 1. 346 0.010 2.4333 0.100 0.085 1. 358 0.010 2.4667 0.100 0.086 1. 370 0.010 2.5000 0.100 0.089 1. 381 0.010 2.5333 0.100 0. 093 1. 393 0.010 2. 5667 0.100 0. 096 1. 4 04 0.010 2.6000 0.100 0.099 1. 415 0.010 2. 6333 0.100 0.103 1. 560 0.010 2 . 6 6 67 0.100 0.106 1. 816 0.010 2.7000 0.100 0.109 2.144 0.010 2.7333 0.100 0 .113 2.530 0.010 2.7667 0.100 0 .116 2. 966 0.010 2.8000 0.100 0 .119 3.447 0.010 2.8333 0.100 0.123 3. 969 0.010 2. 8 6 67 0.100 0.126 4.529 0.010 2.9000 0.100 0.129 5.124 0.010 2.9333 0.100 0.133 5.753 0.010 2. 9667 0.100 0.136 6.414 0.010 3.0000 0.100 0.139 7.104 0.010 Name : Basin 2 Bypass: Yes Ground.Water: No Pervious Land Use acre C, Lawn, Flat .26 Pervious Total 0.26 ImEervious Land Use acre ROADS FLAT 0.02 SIDEWALKS FLAT 0.05 Impervious Total 0.07 Basin Total 0.33 Element Flows To: Surface Interflow Groundwater Technical Information Report 4-7 LDC Job No. 16-137 Name : Tank. 1 Tank Name: Tank 1 Dimensions Depth: Tank Type : Diameter: Length: 8 ft. Circular 8 ft. 470 ft. Discharge Structure Riser Height: 7.5 ft. Riser Diameter: 18 in. Orifice 1 Diameter: 0.46875 in. Elevation: 0.5 ft. = 391.50 Orifice 2 Diameter: 1.15625 in. Elevation: 5.73 ft.= 396.73 Element Flows To: Outlet 1 Outlet 2 Tank Hydraulic Table Stage (feet) Area(ac. ) Volume(ac-ft.) Discharg:e(cfs) Infilt(cfs) 0.0000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0889 0.018 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.1778 0.025 0.003 0.000 0.000 0. 2 667 0.031 0.005 0.000 0.000 0.3556 0.035 0.008 0.000 0.000 0.4444 0.039 0. Oll 0.000 0.000 0.5333 0.043 0.015 0.001 0.000 0.6222 0.046 0.019 0.002 0.000 0.7111 0.049 0.023 0.002 0.000 0.8000 0.051 0.028 0.003 0.000 0.8889 0.054 0.032 0.003 0.000 0. 977 8 0.056 0.037 0.004 0.000 1. o 667 0.058 0.043 0.004 0.000 1.1556 0.060 0.048 0.004 0.000 1.2444 0. 062 0.053 0.005 0.000 1.3333 0.064 0.059 0.005 0.000 1.4222 0.066 0.065 0.005 0.000 1.5111 0.067 0.071 0.006 0.000 1.6000 0.069 0.077 0.006 0.000 1. 688 9 o. 07 o 0.083 0.006 0.000 1.7778 0.071 0.089 0.006 0.000 1. 8 6 67 0. 07 3 0. 096 0.007 0.000 1.9556 0.074 0. 102 0.007 0.000 2.0444 0.075 0.109 0.007 0.000 2. 1333 0. 07 6 0 .116 0.007 0.000 2.2222 0.077 0.122 0.007 0.000 2.3lll 0.078 0.129 0.008 0.000 2.4000 0. 079 0.136 0.008 0.000 2.4889 0.079 0.143 0.008 0.000 2.5778 0.080 0.151 0.008 0.000 2.6667 0.081 0.158 0.008 0.000 2.7556 0.082 0.165 0.009 0.000 2.8444 0.082 o .172 0.009 0.000 Technical Information Report 4-8 LDC Job No. 16-137 2. 9333 0.083 0.180 0.009 0.000 3.0222 0.083 0.187 0.009 0.000 3.1111 0.084 0.195 0.009 0.000 3.2000 0.084 0.202 0.009 0.000 3.2889 0.084 0.210 0.010 0.000 3.3778 0.085 0.217 0.010 0.000 3.4667 0.085 0.225 0.010 0.000 3.5556 0.085 0.232 0.010 0.000 3.6444 0.086 0.240 0.010 0.000 3.7333 0.086 0.248 0.010 0.000 3.8222 0.086 0.255 0.010 0.000 3.9111 0.086 0. 2 63 0.011 0.000 4.0000 0.086 0.271 0 .011 0.000 4.0889 0.086 0.278 0.011 0.000 4.1778 0.086 0.286 0.011 0.000 4.2667 0.086 0.294 0.011 0.000 4.3556 0.086 0.301 0.011 0.000 4.4444 0.085 0.309 0.011 0.000 4.5333 0.085 0. 317 0.012 0.000 4. 6222 0.085 0.324 0.012 0.000 4.7111 0.084 0.332 0.012 0.000 4.8000 0.084 0.339 0.012 0.000 4.8889 0.084 0.347 0.012 0.000 4.9778 0.083 0.354 0.012 0.000 5.0667 0.083 0.362 0.012 0.000 5.1556 0.082 0.369 0.012 0.000 5.2444 0.082 0.376 0.013 0.000 5.3333 0.081 0.384 0.013 0.000 5.4222 0.080 0.391 0.013 0.000 5.5111 0. 079 0.398 0.013 0.000 5.6000 0. 079 0. 405 0.013 0.000 5.6889 0. 078 0. 412 0.013 0.000 5. 7778 0 .077 0.419 0. 021 0.000 5.8667 0.076 0.426 0.027 0.000 5.9556 0. 075 0.433 0.031 0.000 6.0444 0.074 0.439 0.034 0.000 6.1333 0.073 0.446 0.037 0.000 6.2222 0 .071 0.452 0.039 0.000 6.3111 0.070 0.458 0.042 0.000 6.4000 0.069 0.465 0. 04 4 0.000 6.4889 0.067 0.471 0. 04 6 0.000 6. 5778 0.066 0.477 0.048 0.000 6.6667 0.064 0.482 0.049 0.000 6.7556 0.062 0.488 0.051 0.000 6.8444 0.060 0.494 0.053 0.000 6.9333 0.058 0.499 0.054 0.000 7. 0222 0.056 0.504 0.056 0.000 7 .1111 0.054 0.509 0.058 0.000 7.2000 0.051 0.514 0.059 0.000 7.2889 0.049 0.518 0.060 0.000 7.3778 0.046 0.522 0. 062 0.000 7.4667 0.043 0. 52 6 0.063 0.000 7.5556 0.039 0.530 0.273 0.000 7.6444 0.035 0.533 0.935 0.000 7.7333 0.031 0.536 1.823 0.000 7.8222 0.025 0.539 2.824 0.000 7. 9111 0.018 0.541 3.822 0.000 Technical Information Report 4-9 LDC Job No. 16-137 8.0000 8.0889 0.000 0.000 0.542 0.000 4. 710 5. 4 02 ANALYSIS RESULTS Predeveloped Landuse Totals for POC #1 Total Pervious Area:1.65 Total Impervious Area:O Mitigated Landuse Totals for POC #1 Total Pervious Area:0.48 Total Impervious Area:1.17 0.000 0.000 Flow Frequency Return Return Period Periods for Flow (cfs) 0.041527 0.064347 0.076714 0.089283 0.096746 0.102878 Predeveloped. POC #1 2 year 5 year 10 year 25 year 50 year 100 year Flow Frequency Return Return Period 2 year 5 year 10 year 25 year 50 year 100 year Periods for Mitigated. Flow(cfs) 0.043262 0.066082 0.085184 0.114567 0.14075 0.171051 POC #1 Annual Peaks for Predeveloped and Mitigated. POC #1 Year Predeveloped Mitigated 1949 0.048 0.043 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 195 6 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 0.081 0.104 0.032 0.025 0.036 0.064 0.052 0.040 0.045 0.037 0. 0 64 0.038 0.022 0.030 0.037 Technical Information Report 0.079 0.227 0.031 0.041 0.040 0.042 0.067 0.047 0.037 0.033 0.055 0.037 0.028 0.037 0.047 4-10 LDC Job No. 16-137 1965 0.028 0.040 1966 0.028 0.037 1967 0.061 0. 04 9 1968 0.038 0.047 1969 0.037 0.035 1970 0.028 0.034 1971 0. 027 0.037 1972 0.075 0.090 1973 0.034 0.040 1974 0.036 0.039 1975 0.051 0.052 1976 0.034 0.036 1977 0.003 0.032 1978 0.029 0. 04 3 1979 0. 017 0.032 1980 0.050 0.072 1981 0.027 0.045 1982 0.047 0.072 1983 0.046 0.035 1984 0. 029 0.035 1985 0.016 0. 028 1986 0.080 0.052 1987 0.067 0.058 1988 0.025 0.027 1989 0.016 0.028 1990 0.106 0.085 1991 0.094 0.091 1992 0.031 0.035 1993 0.035 0. 026 1994 0.009 0.021 1995 0.050 0.043 1996 0. 098 0.209 1997 0.090 0.084 1998 0.018 0.041 Ranked Annual Peaks for Predeveloped and Mitigated. POC #1 Rank Predeveloped Mitigated 1 0.1063 0. 227 5 2 0.1037 0.2086 3 0.0975 0.0914 4 0.0940 0.0901 5 0.0901 0.0851 6 0.0815 0.0837 7 0.0802 0.0793 8 0.0754 0.0720 9 0.0670 0.0718 10 0.0643 0.0671 11 0.0636 0.0576 12 0.0613 0.0552 13 0.0522 0. 0521 14 0.0514 0.0517 15 0.0503 0.0490 16 0.0502 0.0473 17 0.0475 0. 04 68 18 0. 04 68 0. 04 6 6 19 0.0455 0. 04 4 9 Technical Information Report 4-11 LDC Job No.16-137 20 0.0449 0.0433 21 0.0402 0.0430 22 0. 037 6 0.0429 23 0.0375 0.0415 24 0.0375 0.0414 25 0.0372 0.0413 26 0.0371 0.0401 27 0.0362 0.0397 28 0.0359 0.0396 29 0.0354 0.0386 30 0.0342 0.0375 31 0.0336 0.0375 32 0.0319 0.0374 33 0.0306 0.0374 34 0. 02 97 0.0368 35 0. 02 93 0. 03 63 36 0.0288 0.0353 37 0.0285 0.0351 38 0.0282 0.0350 39 0. 0277 0.0349 40 0.0270 0.0343 41 0.0266 0.0331 42 0.0246 0.0319 43 0.0245 0.0316 44 0.0220 0.0312 45 0.0184 0.0284 46 0.0173 0.0278 47 0.0159 0. 0277 48 0.0155 0. 02 6 6 49 0.0089 0. 02 64 50 0.0034 0.0214 POC #1 The Facility PASSED The Facility PASSED. Flow(cfs) Predev Mit Percentage Pass/Fail 0.0208 38 93 3803 97 Pass 0. 0215 3599 3313 92 Pass 0.0223 33 67 2 918 86 Pass 0.0231 3145 2 618 83 Pass 0.0238 2931 2360 80 Pass 0 . 02 4 6 2733 2168 79 Pass 0.0254 2560 2011 78 Pass 0.0261 2390 1863 77 Pass 0.0269 2225 1721 77 Pass 0. 0277 2083 1600 76 Pass 0. 02 B 4 1960 1502 76 Pass 0. 02 92 18 50 1406 76 Pass 0.0300 1746 1307 74 Pass 0.0307 1658 1233 74 Pass 0.0315 15 68 1168 74 Pass 0. 032 3 14 73 1098 74 Pass 0.0330 1390 1024 73 Pass 0.0338 1308 964 73 Pass Technical Information Report 4-12 LDC Job No. 16-137 0.0346 12 45 900 72 Pass 0.0353 1183 849 71 Pass 0.0361 1113 792 71 Pass 0.0369 1056 749 70 Pass 0.0376 1008 708 70 Pass 0.0384 94 9 669 70 Pass 0.0392 912 633 69 Pass 0.0400 87 4 602 68 Pass 0.0407 825 577 69 Pass 0.0415 782 553 70 Pass 0.0423 751 529 70 Pass 0.0430 715 509 71 Pass 0.0438 681 485 71 Pass 0.0446 658 4 64 70 Pass 0.0453 622 445 71 Pass 0. 04 61 602 424 70 Pass 0.0469 571 407 71 Pass 0.0476 549 393 71 Pass 0.0484 521 37 6 72 Pass 0. 04 92 4 92 361 73 Pass 0.0499 468 34 4 73 Pass 0.0507 443 329 74 Pass 0.0515 423 311 73 Pass 0.0522 400 293 73 Pass 0.0530 384 274 71 Pass 0.0538 365 2 63 72 Pass 0.0545 350 252 72 Pass 0.0553 338 235 69 Pass 0.0561 318 224 70 Pass 0.0568 302 219 72 Pass 0.0576 283 206 72 Pass 0.0584 274 201 73 Pass 0.0591 259 193 74 Pass 0.0599 244 186 76 Pass 0.0607 234 178 76 Pass 0.0614 222 171 77 Pass 0.0622 212 164 77 Pass 0.0630 204 153 75 Pass 0.0637 198 149 75 Pass 0.0645 187 141 75 Pass 0.0653 183 133 72 Pass 0.0660 177 123 69 Pass 0.0668 168 117 69 Pass 0.0676 161 110 68 Pass 0.0683 155 106 68 Pass 0.0691 154 98 63 Pass 0.0699 149 91 61 Pass 0.0707 143 86 60 Pass 0. 0714 138 79 57 Pass 0. 0722 131 71 54 Pass 0.0730 124 70 56 Pass 0.0737 119 64 53 Pass 0.0745 111 62 55 Pass 0.0753 106 58 54 Pass 0.0760 102 55 53 Pass 0. 07 68 92 49 53 Pass 0. 077 6 86 45 52 Pass Technical Information Report 4-13 LDC Job No. 16-137 0.0783 82 44 53 Pass 0. 07 91 71 41 57 Pass 0.0799 67 37 55 Pass 0.0806 63 35 55 Pass 0.0814 58 3J 53 Pass 0.0822 54 30 55 Pass 0.0829 50 28 56 Pass 0.0837 48 26 54 Pass 0.0845 45 23 51 Pass 0.0852 43 21 48 Pass 0.0860 37 21 56 Pass 0. 08 68 34 20 58 Pass 0.0875 32 18 56 Pass 0.0883 27 17 62 Pass 0.0891 25 17 68 Pass 0.0898 23 17 73 Pass 0.0906 20 16 80 Pass 0.0914 19 12 63 Pass 0. 0 921 18 12 66 Pass 0.0929 17 12 70 Pass 0.0937 15 11 73 Pass 0.0944 13 11 84 Pass 0.0952 13 11 84 Pass 0.0960 10 11 110 Pass 0.0967 10 11 110 Pass Water Quality BMP Flow and Volume for POC #1 On-line facility volume: 0 acre-feet On-line facility target flow: 0 cfs. Adjusted for 15 min: 0 cfs. Off-line facility target flow: 0 cfs. Adjusted for 15 min: O cfs. Perlnd and Implnd Changes No changes have been made. This program and accompanying docu.,.'Tlentation are provided 'as-is' without warranty of any kind. The entire risk regarding the performance and results of this program is assumed by End User. clear Creek Solutions Inc, and the governinental lice::isee or sublicensees disclaim all warranties, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to implied warranties of program and accompanying documentation. In no event shall Clear Creek Solutions Inc, be liable for any damages whatsoever (including without limitation to damages for loss of business profits, loss of business information, business interruption, and the like) arising out of the use of, or inability to use this program even if Clear Creek Solutions Ice. or their authorized represectatives have been advised of the possibility of such damages. Software Copyright© by Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. 2005-2016; All Rights Reserved. Technical Information Report 4-14 LDC Job No. 16-137 4.2 Water Quality Treatment Per the 2017 City of Renton SWDM section 1.2.8.1 A, the required treatment for the proposed commercial project is Enhanced Basic Treatment. The treatment performance goal for Enhanced Basic WQ menu is 50% reduction of total zinc and 80% removal of total suspended solids (TSS) for a typical rainfall year, assuming typical pollutant concentrations in urban runoff. The proposed enhanced treatment facility is a Filterra Bioretention Systems as approved by the City of Renton Public Works Department Blanket Adjustment dated June 26'h, 2014. The blanket adjustment allows private developments to use Filterra Systems on private property to mitigate for water quality treatment. The Washington State Department of Ecology has approved the Filterra Bioretention Systems for General Use Level Designation for Total Suspended Solids, oil and grease, and enhanced dissolved metals treatment. The proposed Filterra system has been designed and sized in accordance with the conditions specified in the City of Renton Blanket Adjustment. The Filterra unit has been sized for enhanced-basic treatment using a filter hydraulic conductivity of 24.82 inches/hour using the sand filter module in the latest version of WWHM or other Ecology-approved continuous runoff model. The model proves that the Filterra unit chosen is capable of filtering 91 percent of the influent runoff file. Further analysis and design calculations are included in the following pages. Water Quality Tributary Basin: C, Lawn, Flat 0.14 Acres Roads/Flat 0.42 Acres Sidewalks/Flat 0.10 Acres Total 0.66 Acres Peak Flow Rates (701) 100-year = 0.44 cfs (Filterra 6" max=0.6cfs) Technical Information Report 4-15 LDC Job No. 16-137 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: June 26, 2014 TO: Steve Lee, Development Engineering Manager FROM: OJ,l-Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Engineering Manager, x7248 STAFF CONTACT: Hebe C. Bernardo, Surface Water Utility Engineer, x7264 SUBJECT: Blanket Adjustment -Americast Filterra® The City of Renton Surface Water Utility has issued a blanket adjustment allowing private developments to use Filterra Systems on private property to mitigate for water quality treatment and/or oil control requirements, in accordance with City adopted 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual and associated City Amendments. The Washington State Department of Ecology has approved the Filterra® Bioretention Systems for General Use Level Designation for Total Suspended Solids, oil and grease, and enhanced dissolved metals treatment. The Americast Filterra® Bioretention Systems for Basic Treatment, Enhanced Basic Water Quality and/or Oil Treatment will be approved if the following conditions are met: 1. Filterra® is to be used only on commercial and/or industrial site developments where the system will be located in private property. The property owner is responsible for the maintenance and operation of the Filterra® Systems. There must be a single property owner responsible for maintenance of the Filterra Systems. 2. The Filterra® treatment facility shall not be located within City right-of-way or any easements dedicated to the City. 3. Each Filterra® unit shall be sized for Oil Treatment using a filter hydraulic conductivity of 35.46 inches/hour {assuming a hydraulic gradient of 1.41 inch/inch as listed in the Washington State Department of Ecology General Use Level Designation for Americast's Filterra®) using the sand filter module in the latest version of the Western Washington Hydrology Model (WWHM) or other Ecology-approved continuous runoff model. The model must indicate the unit is capable of processing 91 percent of the influent runoff file. Mr. Lee Page 2 of 3 June 26, 2014 4. Each Filterra® unit shall be sized for Enhanced Treatment using a filter hydraulic conductivity of 24.82 inches/hour (assuming a hydraulic gradient of 1.41 inch/inch as listed in the Ecology General Use Level Designation) using the sand filter module in the latest version of the WWHM or other Ecology-approved continuous runoff model. The model must indicate the unit is capable of processing 91 percent of the influent runoff file. 5. Each Filterra"' unit shall be sized for Basic Treatment using a filter hydraulic conductivity of 35.46 inches/hour (assuming a hydraulic gradient of 1.41 inch/inch as listed In the Technical Information Report (TIR)) using the sand filter module in the latest version of the Western Washington Hydrology Model or other Ecology-approved continuous runoff model. The model must indicate the unit is capable of processing 91 percent of the influent runoff file. 6. The use of the Filterra® Bioretention Systems to comply with the Oil Control (Special Requirement #5) requirement for a High Use Site, in addition to Enhanced Basic Water Quality Treatment, is also approved. The same Filterra® unit can be used for both Enhanced Treatment and Oil Control, provided it is sized as specified above. 7. Each site plan must undergo Filterra® review before the unit can be approved for site installation. This will ensure that site grading and slope are appropriate for use of a Filterra® unit. 8. Filterra® media shall conform to the specifications submitted to and approved by Ecology. 9. Facility inspection, maintenance, and reporting are required by the City of Renton Surface Water Utility per the Ecology National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit (Section SS.C.4.c.iii). Facility owners are responsible for ensuring that stormwater facilities are properly maintained and functioning as designed and permitted. The Filterra® facility shall be inspected every six months by the supplier during the first year of operation as offered with the purchase of the Filterra® systems. Inspections will be used to determine the site-specific maintenance schedules and requirements. Maintenance of the facility shall include removing trash, degraded mulch, and accumulated debris from the filter surface and replacing the mulch layer. Maintenance procedures should follow those given in the most recent version of the Filterra® Bioretention Systems Operation and Maintenance Manual. During the first year of operation of the facility, written records of the inspections and maintenance shall be submitted to the City of Renton Surface Water Utility, to the attention of Edward Mulhern, Surface Water Utility Engineer. H:\Flle Sys\SWP -Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 -Surface Water Projects (CIP}\27-3129 Renton Stormwater Manual\ADJ USTMENTS\Bla nket Adjustments\2014-06·25· Bia nket Adjustment ·Filterra·F.doc\HCBa h Mr. Lee Page 3 of 3 June 26, 2014 10. Following the first year of operation, the property owner or owner of the facility shall annually have the Filterra® Bioretention Systems inspected and maintained per the procedures in the most recent version of the Filterra® Bioretention Systems Operation and Maintenance Manual. Written records of the inspection and maintenance shall be submitted to the City of Renton Surface Water Utility, to the attention of Edward Mulhern, Surface Water Utility Engineer. If more frequent inspection and maintenance of the Filterra® Bioretention Systems is required by the manufacturer or is needed to ensure performance ofthe facility, then the additional inspection and maintenance reports completed within the year shall be provided with the annual report. 11. The plans and TIR for the project must be revised to include the use of the Filterra® Bioretention Systems and this adjustment approval. This adjustment is a conceptual approval for using the Filterra® Bioretention Systems for Enhanced Basic Water Quality and Oil Control (Oil Treatment). Further analysis and design calculations shall be included in the TIR for final approval. 12. The applicant will need to submit a Drainage Facility Covenant for inspection and maintenance of the Filterra® treatment facility. The Drainage Facility Covenant can be found in Reference J ofthe City of Renton Amendments to the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual. A site plan showing the location of the treatment facility must be included as Exhibit A with the declaration of covenant. 13. The approval of this adjustment does not relieve the applicant from other city, state, or federal requirements. Please notify the applicant of our approval of the adjustment request and associated conditions related to the approval listed above .. If you have any questions about this adjustment, please contact me or Hebe Bernardo. cc: Lys Hornsby, P.E., Utility Systems Director H:\File Sys\SWP -Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 -Surface Water Projects (CJP)\27-3129 Renton Stormwater Ma nual\ADJ USTMENTS\B la nket Adjustments\2014-06-25-B!a nket Adjustment -Filte rra-F .doc\HCBah Ct 1~NTECH® ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS @filterra Size and Cost Estimate Prepared by Mike Gillette on December 19, 2016 Renton Special Care Community Renton, WA Information Provided: -- Structure ID FTIBP Total basin area 0.66 ac Impervious area 0.52 ac Filterra model FTIBP ---- Treatment type Enhanced Outlet pipe size 6" Media bay dimensions 101 X 6' Approximate Price $27,700 System Parameters: • Filterra Media Flow Rate= 35 in/hr • Depth Required from Rim to Inlet= At least 16" • Depth Required from Rim to Outlet= At least 50" • Depth Required from Invert In to Invert Out= At least 34" • Reviewing agency = City of Renton Size and Cost Estimate: The Filterra system for this site was sized using VWVHM. Per the Department of Ecology approval, the total basin area, percent impervious area, and site location were used to size the system. Contech Engineered Solutions recommends using the Filterra Internal Bypass -Piped inlet configuration. The estimated costs of this system is shown above, and this includes the complete system delivered to the job site. This estimate assumes that the system is delivered with all components pre-installed. The contractor is responsible for setting the Filterra and connecting all external plumbing. The Filterra Internal Bypass -Pipe (FTIBP) system with a 6" pipe has an internal bypass capacity of 0.6 els. If the peak discharge from the drainage area is expected to exceed this rate, we recommend increasing the pipe size or utilizing an alternative configuration such as the Filterra -Standard Offine system with a downstream curb inlet structure. ©2015 Contech Engineered Solutions LLC www.conteches.com 11835 NE Glenn Widing Dr., Portland OR 97220 Toll-free: 800.548.4667 Fax: 800.561.1271 Page 1 of 1 ~-----LENGTH-----~ r ---,-tt±~tf'bA_J _ _ll.. ------~ I I L I SOR 35 INLET COUPLll'lG CAST INTO PRE CAST VAULT WALL >-------llcNGTf-1------ '¢ f-L~L _______ JL ___________ , A ' ' A A c-------LENGTH-------j A~--------~L-----------~ ' ' ' ' A ~ ' ' ' ' ar,;,.--,t..S,-- ' ' ' "' : . "',--j: I •TuJIID--""----T,> ': ' ' : ">, ~_@:: :: T i ~ L J ~ L ' ' ' ~@==- .\ : ', ' 'r..c I 11:= J S!~ ' ' ' ' ' --Uf ' ' ' ' ' . ' Cl I ---, ______ ...., L-----1-,:roT--------1r----- PLAN VIEW ' INLET COUPLING LOCATIONS CLEAN OUT FRAME ANO OVER CAST INTO TOP SLAB ERCY DISSIPATION ROCKS SOR 35 INLET PIPE WITH BYPASS SLOTS SDRJ5 INLET COUPLING gc; J..---4. PLAN VIEW ',, SOR 35 OUTLET COUPLING CAST INTO PRE CAST VAULT WALL 3"MULCHlAYER, TYP. PROVIDED BY CONTECH 02" IRRIGATION PORT, TYP. ' ' ' ' ' ,, ---LlJ.j ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 01--------,r-----------~ PLAN VIEW sO oe &i a;- ~g ~~ 2,- 5 :.. ~ ~ i g TI ,l iii . JJ $ < so oe "" ~~ ~a::::: :::::5 -1-1-:..r->- ~2 i ~it ---g 'rlf-N 21" FIL TERR.'. MED'°', TYP. PROV!DED BY CON TECH SOR35 CUTI.ET COUPLING ~e ·" :i$f:: ~ a ~ :;: a w "' ~ g ·11 .. ll ~~- SECTION A-A 6" UNDERDRAIN STONE LAYER, TYP. PROVIDED av CON TECH SECTION A-A SECTION A-A ! § 6" BYPASS INLET PIPE CONFIGURATION 8" BYPASS INLET PIPE CONFIGURATION 10" BYPASS INLET PIPE CONFIGURATION APPROXIMATE MAXl~UM BYPASS• Q 8 CFS APPROXIMATE MAXIMUM BYPASS• 1.2 CFS APPROXIMATE MAXIMUM BYPASS" 2.2 CFS INLET/ UNDER- TREE DESIGNATION/ SIZE I LENGTH I WIDTH I OUTLET DRAIN GRATE PIPE DIA. PIPE DIA. [PERF.J QTY. & SIZE FTIBP0404--tl '" ~·--0· , . .,. 8" SOR:15 4"SDR3S (1)J'xJ' INLET/ UNDER-TREE DRAIN DESIGNATION SIZE LENGTH WIDTH OUTLET PJPE DIA. GRATE PIPE DIA. (PERF.) QTY. & SIZE FTIBP0604-8 . " 6'--0" , . .,. a• SOR 35 4" SOR 35 (1)3'• 3' INLET/ UNDER-TREE DESIGNATION I S!ZE I LENGTH I WIDTH I OUTLET DRAIN GRATE PIPE DIA. PIPE DIA. (PERF.) QTY. & SIZE FTIBP000&-10 ,, . ~·.;i· , . .,. 1(.l"SOR35 4"S0RJ5 (1)3'd" I 8 FTIBP060o\..<l ... 6'--0" , . .,. 8" S0R3S 4" SDR 35 (1)3',J' FTIBP0606--B ,,, ,.,. 8'--0" 8" S0R3.~ 4" SOR 35 (1)3'xJ' FTIBP0804-6 ... , . .,. 4'.()" 6" SOR 35 4"SDRJ5 (l)J'xJ' FTIBPO(I00.8 "' ,.,. 6'.(l" a• SOR 35 4" SOR 35 (1)3'. J' FTIBP000-1-8 ,,, , . .,. 4'--0" 8" SOR 35 4" SDR 35 11P' <J FTIBP0806--<! ,, . , . .,. 6'--0" 8" S0R35 4" SDR 35 11l4'x4 FTIBPOB00-10 '" 8'.;]" , . .,. 10" SOR 35 4"SDRJ5 (1)4' .-4' FTIBP1D06-10 10•6 10'-0" , . .,. 10"SDRJ5 ll"SOR 35 (1)4'• 4' FT1BP1204·10 12x4 1:t-0· , . .,. 10"SDR35 6" SOR 35 (2) 3' • 3' ! FTIBP0806--6 ,, . .. .,. 6'--0" 8"S0R 35 4"S0R35 (1)4'x4' FT1BP1006-6 10x6 1D'--0" 8'--0" 8" SOR 35 6" SOR 35 1 4')(4' FTIBP1006--.a 10• 6 ,,.,. 6".(l" 8"SOR35 6" SOR 35 11)4'x4' FTJBPt204-B 12•4 12'.{J" , . ..,. 6'"SC!ll35 6" SOR 35 12)3'x3' FT1BP1200--10 12 •6 12"--0" 6'-0" 1D'SDR35 6" SOR 35 (2)4' X 4' FT1BP1307-10 13x 7 13"--0" ,,. 1D'SDRJ5 6"SOR 35 (2)4' ,4' I FT1BP1204-0 12x4 ,,.,. 4'--0" 8" SOR 35 6" SOR 35 12)3'x3' FT1BP1200-6 12 x6 ,,.,. a·.o· 6" SOR JS 6" SDR JS l2)4'x4' 13x 7 ,.,. 8" SOR 35 !l"SDRJS (2)4',4' FT1BP1200-ll 12,11 ,,.,. ,.,. 13'"SOR 35 6" $DR 35 12)4'x4' .__ FTIBP1307..f! L.2_3_•!__.______l_!_--0_" '"' 8""SDR 35 8"" SDR35 <2)4'<4' INTERNAL PIPING MAY VARY DEPENDING UPON INFLUENT LOCATION • MAXIMUM TOP TO INVERT OUT~ 5'-{i" •• MAXIMUM TOP m INVERT IN~ 2-<> INTl'RNAL PIPING IMY VARY DEPENDlt>IG UPON INFLUENT LOCATION ...... _ i FT1BP1307·6 IJ'--0" I:;,..-:;=:::••·...=;~ ,....:-._-;;_ • .:,:;:;::;:,,._:-:,_..:.....,,;:;-..:_:c.;::.o;=.:::=,.. -~__:,:::::r.;-.. -;:_ • ...;...--= ..... ...,__;;_-=. .... I ~ INTERNAL PIPING MAY VARY DEPENDING UPON JNFU!l'NT LOCATION • MAXIMUM TOP TO INVERT OUT• 5'·5" ~ • MAXI Isl UM TOP TO IN\IERT OUT= 5'.s" "MAXIMUM TOP TO INVERT IN~ 2'-<3" . _ -=-------:. • =='Z:':.:a ~-t= "°"""~-m<:':"7"""'T"-M ...... ...._u.__ .,...,_ ~ ""MAXIMUMTOPTOINVERTIN•:i'-6" CONTECH" j £\filterra· ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS UC f:i • DIMENSIONS MAY VARY ~h· DEPENDING -~•-=-~-~-~ www.Cont.tchES.com '!J ON PRECASTER BUILD CONFIGURATION. ;~::.,'="!;:~~::.:;.;;:;,:.:::~,-• 90P.i Cenlr,o P<lln"'Dt, So .. •oo. W•OL C""'t"', OH 45069 i, W0-3311-1122 513-M5-7000 &13-641>-7993 FAX FIL TERRA INTERNAL BYPASS PIPE (FTIBP) CONFIGURATION DETAILS 4.3 Flow Control BMPs -Low Impact Development Flow Control BMPs, also known as Low Impact Development (LID) techniques, must be applied to the site design in accordance with the requirements specified in the 2017 City of Renton SWDM section C.1.3.2 Large Lot BMP Requirements. Evaluation for the feasibility and applicability of prescribed flow control BMPs is provided below: 1. Full Dispersion: Not applicable. The proposed commercial development does not provide sufficient native vegetation to meet the minimum flow path requirements for full dispersion. 2. Full Infiltration of Roof Runoff: Not feasible. Full infiltration is infeasible and not required as the minimum design requirements (below) cannot be met: • "Existing soils must be coarse sands or cobbles or medium sands" - onsite glacial till soils do not exhibit infiltration characteristics that will allow full infiltration BMPs to "fully and reliably" infiltrate runoff into the ground. 3. Flow Control BMP Feasibility List: The following BMPs have been fully evaluated for feasibility and applied to the site where determined feasible as required. • Full Infiltration: Not feasible. Full infiltration is infeasible and not required as the minimum design requirements (below) cannot be met: • Existing site soils must be coarse sands or cobbles or medium sands -onsite glacial till soils do not exhibit infiltration characteristics that will allow full infiltration BMPs to "fully and reliably" infiltrate runoff into the ground. • Limited Infiltration: Not feasible. Limited infiltration is infeasible as the following minimum design requirements cannot be met: • Existing site soils may be fine sands, loamy sands, sandy loams, or loams -present onsite glacial till soils are not suitable for limited infiltration systems. • Bioretention: Not feasible. Bioretention is infeasible as the following criteria can be cited as reasons for a finding of infeasibility without further justification: Technical Information Report 4-16 LDC Job No. 16-137 • 21.) Where the field testing indicates potential bioretention sites have a measured native soil saturated hydraulic conductivity less than 0.30 inches per hour -According to Infiltration Testing Letter Report, performed by Michael Place, PE dated January 6'\ 2017, native till soils contain a measured native soil saturated hydraulic conductivity of 0. 10 to 0. 20 inches per hour. • Permeable Pavement: Feasible. Permeable pavement is feasible with the use of underdrains as specified in section C.2. 7.1. Permeable pavement is proposed in all parking stall locations (except for ADA parking stall locations), totaling 4,306 square feet. 2,400 square feet of pollution generating impervious run-on is contributing to the permeable pavement area. Summary: The total targeted impervious cover applied to permeable pavement BMP is 6,706 square feet. 4. Basic Dispersion: Not feasible. The proposed architectural site plan does not provide sufficient vegetated pervious surfaces to meet the minimum design requirements for basic dispersion concerning the minimum vegetated flowpath lengths. 5. BMP Application Rate: For projects that will result in an impervious surface coverage greater than 65% on the buildable portion of the site/lot, on-site BMPs must be applied to 20% of the target impervious surfaces or to an impervious area equal to at least 10% of the site/lot, whichever is less. • 10% of Lot= 0.1 x 65,715 = 6,571 SF • 20% of Target Impervious Surface= 0.2 x 47,720 = 9,544 SF • Summary: On-site BMPs must be applied to at least 6,571 SF of Target Impervious Surfaces Technical Information Report 4-17 LDC Job No. 16-137 Permeable Pavement Design: The proposed permeable pavement flow control BMP has been designed in accordance with the 2017 City of Renton SWDM section C.2. 7.1. The design is based on soils information presented in Infiltration Testing Letter Report prepared by PSI on January 6'h, 2017. Underdrains will be used to discharge all runoff that will not infiltrate into the native soils. Design infiltration rates range from 0.02 to 0.05 in/hr at the locations of proposed permeable pavement. Technical Information Report 4-18 LDC Job No. 16-137 5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Conveyance analysis and design is not required at this time and will be provided during the construction documents submittal. Preliminary TIR 5-1 LDC Job No. 16-137 6.0 SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES • Geotechnical Engineer Study prepared by Earth Solutions NW, LLC dated 11 /11 /15 (Project# ES-3613) • Site Investigation and Analysis of Previous Geotechnical Report, Renton Special Care Community, 17033 -103th Avenue SE, Renton, Washington prepared by PSI, Inc. dated November 2"d, 2016 • Infiltration Testing Letter Report prepared by PSI, Inc. dated January 6th, 2017 Technical Information Report 6-1 LDC Job No. 16-137 7.0 OTHER PERMITS Technical Information Report 7-1 LDC Job No. 16-137 8.0 SWPPP ANALYSIS AND DESIGN SWPPP analysis and design is not required at this time and will be provided during the construction documents submittal. Technical Information Report 8-1 LDC Job No. 16-137 9.0 BOND QUANTITIES & FACILITY SUMMARIES Bond Quantities will not be provided at this time and will be submitted at a later date. Technical Information Report 9-1 LDC Job No. 16-137 10.0 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL The proposed storm system consists of catch basins, manholes, a detention tank facility and a Filterra water quality facility. These facilities will require periodic maintenance and inspection based on the procedures below. The procedures are based on Appendix A of the 2017 City of Renton Surface Water Design Manual. Technical Information Report 10-1 LDC Job No. 16-137 .f B[)'\I ~/ "~~::l~-~()()F >, ~ c.u,e'IT eOA::io -- vE.RreAl Sl;:MN,.I 'JINYl Wl\1 00.'IJS CEMENT S0r\R) LAP S104...C {,,_",J..1 S!, F:?OR EXISTIN::.OGRADE ----~ (EX STING AVE RAGE GR.A.DE 412') PROPOSEDG::i,ce --- is-e1 y (s~ 1 / ('\COTTAGE B (l 08TH AVE S E) EAST ELEVATION ~· 1 1 8 " ~ 1'-0" " i:: T. 0 ROOF 432' · 8" 3 TAB ASPHALT Sl-l,\IG.:. ROOF c n 1E \IT BOARD -- VERTK.AL Sl~NG Vlt-. Y. ll.1"1 00',~5 C U1EN-BOARD LAP Sl)l/1IG ni..~ 1 S T Fl,QO_B___ V ~10'.s" EXISTING GRADE - (EX S TING AVfRAGE GRA.O!: <112') PROP'JSEOCRAOE --- ~ (s~ ~7 r 0 C O T T A G E B W EST EL EV AT I O N \_:_. ~ /'BA: s;:rj iBo'1 "-( TO ROOF '132 ' • 8" 3 TAe ASPI-A. T SHlt-.GLE i..oo= f< I ce~E NT eo.·,::io -- ~ VE.RTK:.4.L SIDING Vlt-.Y.W'INOOW~ cn~EN " BOARC LAP SIOIN:3. ~Lc;>oR ~410'-6" ,,---._ 1B 101 ''( EXlSJ INGGRAOE -~ ' (EXISTING,WE>lAGE GRADE 41 2') / PR:iro5EOC:ta.OE ~v (~ COTT AG E B NORTH ELEVAT ION ,_. 1,s .. ~1·-0· ,~ROOF ~ 1432'. 8" " !:: J TAB "-<;P"lA.LT SHIN(f l[ ROOf -- CEM;:NT OOARO - '.i[R-11:Al SIDING 1/IN""l'M"-'(X)II.JS (:(ME.N T so.;~o LAP SIOI\IC 1ST FLOOR _ '410' • 6" PROPO!'>EDG::iADE ~~ EXISTING GRA0£ ----------- (EXISTlt,.G AV€RAG E GR..\rlE 4 12') ~~ (? Is~ ~ r~ CO TT AGE B SOU TH E_L_E_V_A_T_IO_N ____________ _ \.~ ls?"1 ~6) \'.:( ,. (s~ _,.--.._, 18 101 'r:) '( l~EC:E:i\lLD JAN i 9 l'Cil7 ·r·y ( ,:: <')l:N. TON -.•I j ' .. ,. ltC \~,,., .\':'~:-::i.1 ,_ \\.. . - ~1 4''• ~ \_,.---- ©) I ~ ~ a w ~ " -;; Ei ~ 0 L) ~ ~ :,; w 6 ~ ~ i;j ~ I '< "' " :, -1 I JRAWN CH E.CKE(: JOB NO 5216 [ill) Jc n sc n/f cy ARCHITECTUR E & PLANNING 7i30 LEARY W AY NE RED\10NO, WA 9805 2 RENTON SPECI.\L CA.RE C.CMMUNITT LLC 2131 771n A.VE SE STE 200 MERCER 151.A ND W/,,. 98040 n MAGNET design +development I~ :) ~ ~ 0 u w 0:::: <( u ....J <( u w D.. Cl) z 0 f-z w 0:::: OF w Cl) WI'--- :) I!) z ...-w <X) >cr> ~~ <X) • oz ...-0 ("') 1-("') z OW ~ Cl'.'. SHEET A201 JI il ((l 1H !l w (.9 I- <( ~ 0 u Cl) z 0 ~ w ....J w H 0:::: 0 0:::: • W I t-i >< • w SH ([TS I T .O. ROOF 432' • 8" ': I CEMENT~RD -- ~ VERTCAL Slf.1!1.IG \/lN '"l VVINCOWS CEMENT BOARD LAP SICING ~ ... 1ST F LOOR ® PROPOSEOGAAOE -----~ EJUS ,.ING GRADE __::;;- (EXISTI NG AVEJ:U.GE GRADE 404 51 i'sG'1 'l_/ G") ~~'T=Tl~:E C EAST ELEVATION @ I Csf T.O. ROOF ·4 32· • 8'' .. (s~ '.:T.J fsG1 1 / ,~, i BE I ·y ~ T ~ I C EMENT~:) --i::: VE~n::.A~ StClt<.G Vl'IYL wiNOCWS CE ME"-r BOAAO LAP SIDING 1ST FLOOR a-11 11· ---,-1-r.~;-::1 ~-_~:;;.i~1ill&Jt1~u-_~;1 ~ IH!m!m!:I I lli!!!J ml!!] I U!!!!! I .ill!. w -- ./'4 10·. 6" PROPOSED GRADE E'-ISTING GRAD: ------~ {EXISTING AVEAAGE GRACE ~04 5') CO TT AGE C WEST ELEVAT I ON I I 8 " ~ I '-0" T.0 ROOF ·432· • 8" '.! TAB ASPHALT SHINGLE ROO~ " . I CEME 'lT 9C')A~O -- ~ V[ROCAL SI DI NG V lNYL 'NIN[)()WS CE I/ENT B0A'{0 LAP SIDING ""'-"'•~ ;~ ~~?OR PROPOSED GRAC E E.XlSTINGG:tA.Or ----- (EXISTl "'G A.'/[RAG[ GRADE 404 51 (cs'1 T/ Ci) ~~-T~T 1~:E C NORT H ELE VAT I ON ~.T.0.ROOF "i1<4 32· • 8" " ~ I ~~~,~i~,~~iG 1/I~ YL v'll~OON~ ,l,,~ 1STFLOOR V 410'-6" 1.-'\ 1C1) "I PROPOSEOG-1.AOE -----~ 1.-..... 1c 2 ' \.:T/ EXlST l t-.C~GR',OE ------- (EXISTING AVERAGE GRACE-4°.:_5")---~ ---- 'c4\, '-=T:; (c~ T -------- G) ~~!~T1~~E C (S E 1 72ND ST ) SOUT H ELEVATION -, 0~ T ------ (~ \.:TY f~ T rc1\ \.:( 05) ( JAN 1 9 ?.t 11 ' CiYY Ot RtN1'0~ PLANNING DIVISION --. ~1)p J ~.,. _J ~\J .... ~u I ~ I ! I " C, -.t. i I z C z " C ~ ~ z ~ ~ " w u " D ,-r- ~ f ~ -< w 0 ; "' I ~ ~ ::, O~AV~N C"'1ECKEO JCB '-10 52 16 Ifill Jensen/Fey QI I ARCHITECTURE & PL.ANNING 7730 LEARY WAY ~E REDM OND. WA 98052 T{_ 4 ~.,~~,_c,;-o ,..,. ~Et<liOt<. SPE.C.lAl CA.=.:t COMMUNn' LLC. 7731 mr .,1,1/E SE STE 1C3 ~E RCER SSlA,"4D WA 9eCl40 0 MAGNET design +development ,, ll >-0 Ji ., f-w H z (.9 :::, ;:: ~ ~ f- 0 0 0 0 I w w Cl) er: Cl) z <i:: 0 0 w "" f-_J :::, I.() <i:: <i:: z ..-w oo > 0 > (J) w w <i:: <i:: _J w j Cl. £S ; Cl) 00 er: z oz 0 0 ..-0 er: ! f-(") f-w I z (") z f-w OW >< er: ~ er: w SHEET A202 0' SHEETS T. 0. ROOF '432'-8" - (f*f1(0~ ~(\'.::'1_ 3 TAB ASPHAL-St-lNGLE ROO~ " I CEM ':NT B()ARC --~ VERTK:A_ SICING 1/l'l"L W'INOCV,'S CEME~T BOARD l.}P 51DlMG 1ST F LOOR r410' -6 " (!:XIST NG AVERAGE G RADE -409 75'} EXISTING GRA~E -_., PR~[OGRADE -- IC-, )) @~ T r ~COTT A GE D (108th AVE SE) EAS T ELE VA TIO N ~j r 'I,. T. 0. ROOF .. 7r432 -8" " ::: HAS ASPHALT SHNGU ROO" CE MENT BCARO -- VE !H~ SID1,1,1G VINYL 'filNOOWS Cy 1ST F LOOR r '4 W. 6 " 7-___ _ (~ ):) @ i ~flOPOS:CG:UCE ~ / ------------------ EXJSTING GRADE ___/ {EXISTI NG AVERAGE GR..ADE 409 75') ~COTT AG E D W E S_T--=-E L=-E=-V-'-A---'---T _I O_:_c_N _________ _ ~/ 1 1 8 " = 1'-0" ... ::: T.0 ROOF ·432·. a·· :? TAB ASrHALT Sttlto.G LE ROOF CEl.lENT BOARJ VERTC AL SIDING VINY L 'J\IM)O'a,·s ~J..;;;:~?OR E,_ESTl"IG GAAOr ___J (EXISTING AVERAGE GRACE 4 09 75'1 PRCPOSEJ GRAOE /'~ 01 0 '-( (oo\ '--r/ 1~ COTT AG E D NORTH ELEVA TI ON I 3 \.:::.. 1 1 s· -1 ·-0" ,a., T. 0 . R OOF .,.., r432. 8" f,, i1 £ 3 TMASPHALT !;I-INC.LE ROOF CEMENT BQ.\RO -- \i[RTIC A~ SICINC 1/l"IYL W\NDCWS C'!:MENT EIOA.ROI..A.P Sl)r.lG 1ST F LOOR (o61 ( (~ ~'.) 4 10' • 6" M OPOSEDCRADE -----d~ ___ ---------- EXJSTIMG GRADE _/ (EXISTING AVERAGE G RADE 409 75') (o ~ ) G)~~-T-TAG E D (SE 172N D ST) SOU TH ELEVATION (o81 ( (~ ~( 'o9'1 \'.( (o6'· T:; ,.,-, D10 '--( 1 \·? ~---~ r· ,. c • J; ..... , ! • JAN1B .. 1; ' .... ffY U~ td:l'liON ,,, /\I\Jt"1:\)r~ n111,c;10'-: ""' ,. ,,,.,., ·,-1 \~.-,.,,·1 x·· \\. --oi. l '"1 · ... '\_------- @ I I I :!! ~ I :§ 'it I ~ I " ! 0: < I " I OR,\WN - Ct-<t:C ".ED J 06 1\0 52 16 [fill J ensen/Fey ARCH ITECTURE & PLANNlr-.G 7730 LEA RY WAY NE RtDMOND. WA 98052 rt:L 4~~:!tCl~t f U RENTON SPEC lA. CAR~ COMM lJ'llfTY I.LC 21'31 1l!hAVE. SE STE 20'3 li!E=ICER t!>l.ANO. WA 9M'1£l n MAGNET design + development Ii 0 ,i >-1, ., I-w il z (!) I- ::::) <( ' ~ I-. I-~ 0 0 (_) (_) I w w Cf) 0:::: Cl) z <( 0 (_) w t--I-....I => l{) ~ <( z T""" w ex:> (_) >O) w w <( <( ....I 0.. £S: w • Cf) 0::: ' co 0 z oz 0 T""" 0 0:::: I I-<'? I-w z <'? z I-1 w OW >< 0::: ~ 0::: w SHEET A203 OF SHEETS ~.T .0 ROOF '"°"'4 31 · -5" ls 1TASASPHA.TSJ-I\IGlE: RCOf" CF'.'f',IT !!.OARD -- 1J[RTICAl SIDING 'JINY·. 1/llNDo..."""1115 C EMENT 80ARD LAP ~IOI\IG ,'a.J 1ST FLOOR -~~410'-6 " ?ROPa.ED GR.A.OE 0 l ~ ~I ( C(f E.XiSTING GAADE -------------------- (EXISTING AVEAAGE GR.ADE 409'1 /8 \ "( ~-EA EAS T ELEV_A_T_I_O_N ________ _ T.O.ROOF .1 r431· .. 5" 3 TASASP h.ALT SHINGLE. ROOF R lilN"L 'MN[)(M'S CEl,EII.T BOAH0 L.J.P SIDl'IG {,_t.,J..1ST FLOOR cp (c)(o) "-1-(' (i "") ~j ( '-. i ) '/T ------------------------- PROPOSE.O GRAD{ EXISTING GR.ADE -- (EXIS.l"'G AVE RACE GR.ACE 40'-J') __JI r\ CO TT AGE A WEST ELEVATION 1\!_..1 1 /8 . -1 '-0" ----------- (A,6\ \_( (AS) "'( ~ .. TO.ROOF F31' .. s· ~ 3 TA8-ASP1-+..ALT SHl~GLE AOO~ \it/YLVIINOC"t.'S f XISTING GRADE - (EXIS.ING AVERAGE CR.A.DE 40CI'} PROPOSE.D GRADE CD ~~-~-T l~~-E A NORTH ELEVAT IO N /'' (A:1) i TO. ROOF 431' -5" 3 TABASPl-<.AL T SHl~GLE ROOF :<l VINYL V'/INXWS - ~J 1S T FLOOR '4 10' -6 " --I r PROPOSEOGRAC,( __J I EXISTING GRAJE --- (E X1S.m,G AVERAGE GRADE 409') ~ (i___,,~~~-T 1 ~~-E A SOU TH ELE VA TIO N ,,-, 'A4 1 ~( ~ (A3) "( )) (A1"1 "( (A4J \_( (A,5'1 "( ~ \_1 DF< '-....... . ,.,:: jA!'i i/ \. ~ ,,; •"_;fff C/1-f?~ r\i 10 h ~ I ,\f\lNII\J( '. / '•!\'h!('~ ~ ,n, \", .... -(,-; ... /\J \::, ;., u '\_....----- e ~ a: w "' " 'ii z 2 ~ 8 I 5 ::;I iii J· -~ • ~ ~I I r?i ~I I ~I i I " ' DRAWN CHEC KEJ JOB N C 5216 [fill Jen se n /Fey g I I I ARCHITECT URE & PLANN I NG 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMON D. WA 98052 T!L ~~,.~:(-0:JZO ~,v, A:ENTON ~PECIAL CA~E. COM \11.JNITY lLC 2731 77:hA\IE SE STE 2C3 ,1,'E~CER I-SL.ANO. WA 9e040 0 MAGNET design +development h <( ii >-Ji ., I-w jJ z (9 ::> <( I-~ I- ~ 0 0 0 0 I w w (f) 0::: (f) z <( 0 0 wt-I- . _J :::) I.{) ; <( z ..-~ wco 0 > cr> w w <(~ _J w , 0... £S I (f) 0::: ; co 0 z oz 0 ..-0 0::: i I-C"'.) I-w z C"'.>z I-I w OW >< 0::: ~ 0::: w ' SHEET A204 O F SHEETS COTTAGE A COTTAGE C Administration Building Siding Below Belly Band -Benjamin Moore Co ttage Red PM-15 Trim and Belly Band -Benj amin Moore Manchester Tan HC-81 Siding Above Belly Band -Benjamin Moore Cottage Red PM-15 Main Entry Doors -Benjam in Moore 2006-20 Sangria Other Doors -Benjam in Moore HC-51 Audubon Russet Residential Building B Siding Below Belly Band -Benjamin Moore HC-86 Kingsport Gray Siding Above Belly Band -Benjamin Moore 193 Dijon Building Trim & Belly Bands -Benjam in Moore HC-81 Manc hester Tan Main Entry Doors -Benjamin Moore 098 Bryce Canyon Other Doors -Benjamin Moore HC-51 Audubon Russet COTTAGE B COTTAGED Residential Building A Sidi ng Below Belly Ba nd -Benjam in Moore HC-86 Kingsport Gray S iding Above Belly Band -Benja m in Moo re H C 14 Princeton G old Bu ilding Trim & Belly Bands -Benj a m i n Moore HC-81 Mancheste r T an Main E ntry Doo rs -Benjam in Moore 2006-20 Sa ngria Other Doors-Benj amin Moore HC-51 Au dubon Rus se t Residential Building C .JAN 1 ::J 1 Siding Below Belly Band -Be nj am in Moore HC -86 Kingsport G ray Siding Above Belly Ba nd -Be njamin Moo re 210 Leajs>.tif'Faith ~t 'JlON Bu ild ing Trim & Belly Bands -Benjamin Moore HC-81 Man~heste~,J ~rn l··-4-E.?i Main E ntry Doors -Benjam i n Moore 2054 Venezuel a n Sea Othe r Doors -Benj amin Moo re HC-51 Audubon Russet Renton Special Care Co unity 170331081" Avenue SE Renton, WA 98157 Site Plan & Conditional Use Submittal Materials 39. Traffic Study (iJhp,~ "'. ...,., .... ,..,, •• , -· ... ,.~.. • r • . .. ... "' ''"'-~r~...,~;i:::,;t, i Transpo~ation _P,anners and J"ra.ffic.l;ngl~ee·rs . · ·. . : ~ '," ·· . , ' 1 ·: -1 ~ 'li, :: , •• -·--"!.. ...~-~ .• ,.._""6 ... ~ ...... _ .. n,;.:.'ii,_(_.,\_ • ..'.• ... _ ................ ~ • .: • '• ...... ... • .. ~' •, •• -•• ~.\A,1"4,(:;, To: From: Proje ct: Subj ect: Date: MEMORANDUM Kevin Carl, Magnet De s ig n + Development Brad Linc o ln , PE Renton Spec ia l Ca re Co mmunity LLC GTC #16-1 36 Traffic Analysi s Report June 23, 2016 This memorandum summari zes the trip ge neration calculations for the Renton Spec ial Care Community develop ment. The development is located in the northwest corner of 108th A venue SE at SE 172nd Street. Th e deve lopment is proposed to replace one ex isting s in g le -family residenti a l unit \V ith an assisted livin g facility \Vith 60 beds. i\ s it e vici nity map in includ ed in Fig ure 1: Site Vicinity 2802 Wetmore Avenue • Suite 220 • Everett WA, 98201 Tel: 425-339-8266 • Fax: 425-258-2922 • E-mail: info@gibsontraffic.com Cottages at Renton Highlands Traffic Analysis 1. Trip Generation Calculations The trip generation calculations for the Renton Special Care Community development are based on data contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE ) Trip Generation Manual, 9zh Edition ~ Volume 2: Data (2 012). The average trip generation rates for lTE Land Use Code 210, Single-Family D e tached Housing, has been used for the existing unit on the s ite. The trip generation from the e x isting unit is summarized in Table 1. Table 1: Trip Generation Calculations -Existing Single-Family Unit 1 Existing Average Daily Trips AM Peak-Hour Trips PM Peak-Hour Trips Single-Family U nits Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound Total Generation Rate 9 .52 trips per unit 0 .75 trips per unit l .00 trips per unit S plits 5 0% 50% 100% 25% 75 % 100% 6 3% 37% 100% Trips 5 5 10 0 I 1 I 0 I The trip generation of the 60-bed Renton Special Care Community development is base d on the average trip generation rates of lTE Land Use Code 254, Assisted Living. The trip generation of the proposed 60-bed facility is summarized in Table 2. · Table 2: Trip Generation Calculations -Proposed Assisted Living Facility 60-Bed Average Daily Trips AM Peak-Hour Trips PM Peak-Hour Trips Assisted Living Facility Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound Total Generation Rate 2.66 trips per bed 0.14 trips per be d . 0.22 trips per bed Splits 50% 50% 100% 65% 35% 100% 44% 56% 100% Trips 80 80 160 5 3 8 6 7 13 The total trip generation with credit for the existing s ingle-family residential unit is summarized in Table 3. Table 3: Total Trip Generation Summary Land Use Size S ingle-Family -l unit (to be removed) Ass isted Living 60 beds ( prooosed u se) NEW TRIPS Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. info@gibsontraffic.com Average Daily Trips -10 160 150 AM Peak-Hour Trips Inbound Outbound Total 0 -1 -l 5 3 8 5 2 7 2 PM Peak-Hour Trips Inbound -l 6 5 Outbound Total 0 -l 7 13 7 12 June 2016 GTC#l6-136 Cottages at Renton Highlands Traffic Analysis The Renton Special Care Community development is anticipated to generate 150 new average daily trips with 7 new AM peak-hour trips and 12 new PM peak-hour trips. The City of Renton Policy Guidelines for Traffic Impact Analysis for New Development identifies that a traffic impact analysis is only required for developments that generate 20 or more AM or PM peak-hour trips. The Renton Special Care Communitydevelopment will not exceed this threshold and therefore a full traffic impact analysis is not required. 2. Transportation Impact Fees The transportation impact fee for the Renton Special Care Community has been calculated using the latest City of Renton Fee Schedule. The City of Renton identifies a rate of $384.76 per attached dwelling for senior housing. This results in transportation impact fees of $23,085.60 for the Cottages at Renton Highlands development. It is important to note that this fee does not vest and is calculated when the building permits are applied for. Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. info@gibsontraffic.com 3 June 2016 OTC #16-136 ITE Trip Generation Data A I I· 296 I ' -gle-Family Detached ~using (210) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 355 Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 198 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Jrip Generation_per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 9.52 4.31 -21.85 3.70 Data Plot and Equation 30,000 .------------------------------~ "' ] · ,20,000 · · · · C. .~ i·, i: ~ a, ~ l II f- 10,000 0 0 X Actual Data Points ,>/:,/. ' ,/" ~~,,.-,,.f~~ _'i,,, . X :x 1000 X = Number of Dwelling Units ---Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) "0.92 Ln(X) + 2.72 ' Trip Generation, 9th Edition • lnstit~te of Transportation Engineers . ,, /,"': / 2000 , -,,,,.-:~" , --r-1--Average Rate . ; X 3000 , / µ • Single-Family Detached Housing (210) , , Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: · ' · On a: I ' Number of Studies: Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: Directional Distribution: '. Dwelling Units Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. 292 194 ' I 25% entering, 75% exiting Trip Gen~ration per Dwelling Unit Av~rage Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.75 0.33 2.27 0.90. Data Plot and Equation -fl C: w C. ~ " 0 :c ~ " ~ " ,ic II I- 3,000 ------------------------------, 2,006 1,000 -· -· · · -· · · · · · 0 0 X Actual Dala Points X X --:.......><------ 1000 X = Number of.Dwelling Units Fltt&a c·urve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.70(X) + 9.74 ,,- -. ----<~~ ,/' .. / ,-X 2000 3000 ---.---Average Rate R2 = 0~89 Trip Ganeration, 9th Edition • Institute of Transportation Engil1eers 297 . I ~ngle-Family Detache .. ousing (210) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 321 Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 207 Directional Distribution: 63% entering, 37% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 1.00 0.42 2.98 1.05 Data Plot and Equation S,000 -----------------------------~ Ol -g w a. 'C 1-- (ll TI :E ~ <l> ~ 1 II I- 2,000 1,000 0 0 X Actual Data Points X ,.-·.,,··············. . ---_x_ ~<~.,- ,,>//; X 1000 X = Number of Dwelling Units ---Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.90 Ln(X) + 0.51 298 Trip Generation, 9th Edition • Institute of Transportation Engineers , , . ,,,,····~······'' .. -. ;~"-. ,,,,.,,.,." ' 2000 1-7--~ Average Rate . , R2 = 0.91 , , , X 3000 a Assisted Living (254) , Average VehTcle Trip Ends vs: Beds Weekday I ' Ona: Number of Studies: 16 Average Number of Beds: 121 • \ Directional Distribution: ·50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per Bed Average Rate Range of Rates. Standard Deviation 2.66 1.86 4.14 1.74 Data Plot and Equation ~ w 0. ~ .!ll " :E " > " I II f- 500 400 300 200 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 X = Number of Beds X Actual Data Points ---Fitted Curve ---:--""~ A_verage Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.56 Ln(X) + 3.07 R2 = 0.55 Trip Generation, 9th Edition • Institute of Transportation Engineers 529 i I I I I, i i [ ! 11 Assisted· Livi.·:, (254) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Beds · On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Number of Studies: 7 Average Number of Beds: 121 · Directional Distribution: 65% entering, 35% exiting · Trip Generation per Bed Average Rate 0.14 Data Plot and Equation 26 25 24 23 22 · "' 'O 21 · C: w C. ~ 20. -lll 19 · :c " > 18 · " C> le! Q) 17 > <( II 16 f- 15 ... -X· ,- 14 -' 13 12 · 11 . 80 90 X Actual Data Points ' 100 ----x:-- ' 110 Fitted Curve Equation: Not glyen \ Range of Rates 0.08 ' 120 ' 130 0.28 X = Number of Beds 530 Trip Generation, 9th Editioh • Institute of Transportation Engineers ' 140 Standard Deviation 0.37 . -. -. -; ·X·. . -X· --., .... . 150 ' 160 ' I ' 170 ' 180 , T----A':'el"age Rate , R2=,..,. ... 190 ' ; Assisted Living (254) Average Vehicle-Trip Ends vs: ·. Beds - On a: Weekday, ' I ' · Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 7 Average Number of Beds: 121 . Directional Distribution: 44% entering, 56% exiting Trip Generation per Bed Average Rate 0.22 Data Plot and Equation 40 -· --· 30 - 20 X X X ... _., .. < __ ,,,."' X• Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.11 0.30 0.47 X --~. ·.X· ' ' ' ----,---------,.--------,--------~----------f--~---- X 10 +----i-~-,--,~~,,--~--,,~~---i-,~~-,--,,-----1~~--,,~~--,--,~~,--,~.,---;,~~--1 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 X = Number of Beds X Actual Data Points ------Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not given Trip Generation, 9th Edition • Institute of Transportation Engineers 531 Renton Special C 17033108th Ave Renton, WA 98157 ommunity lE, EXHIBIT A COMBINED LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 14, Block 4, Aker's Farm No. 5, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 40 of Plats, page 27, records of King County, Washington. Together with: The South half of Lot 15, Block 4, Aker's Farm No. 5, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 40 of Plats, page 27, records of King County, Washington. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. RECEIPT EG00063931 ---------Renton® BILLING CONTACT George & Frances Subic PO Box 89 Renton, WA 98057 REFERENCENUMBER FEENAME LUA 17-000023 PLAN -Administrative Site Plan Review PLAN -Environmental Review PLAN -HE Conditional Use Technology Fee Printed On: January 19, 2017 Prepared By: Jill Ding 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 TRANSACTION TYPE Fee Payment Fee Payment Fee Payment Fee Payment Transaction Date: January 19, 2017 PAYMENT METHOD Check #9106 Check #9106 Check #9106 Check #9106 SUB TOTAL TofAL AMOUNT PAID $2,500.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $210.00 $7.210.00 $7,210.00 Page 1 of 1