Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA89-025
0 2 2 • c) . ei •:-. I 1 e I -I --1 i _•s_Ennyipmfa .• ..,___ . ____ 09 -t 1 2.1 AT ro.62 4.466142 Da INN MORD. NOIR PLOW FROM.11.111 ORRIN* 3.1 COMORE,.FOOTING IS"DIMON 7 l'-0•MINIM. , T , A.I RIINFORCID CM.STANDARD,GRID . SPLIT COO PAM ANC.OUT'CND ----• L__--,--.-, ...--.-- H-0 It1 I - 1-1 I 11.1.9 'IL'; 1•0.- --- ---'-1 -L---:-J at, ....__,IN Emil MK fi_,E'immimmipsiumfr.7 ilo, •SPLIT CM FA..AND IND.CORM 11.• - i ----.-0 * . ,-.... -..___.,'-- •':!..irg"4:711..'77-tt-74 aCC:k e-. 4.3 fIrtlf gli".STANDARD.7 GRID 1261, AMA FACI,MOT OUT EtOILI REAM.AD •• . • - Mie.".÷...41. .....ris.z.,:lt...m..2.,miser47 ,,•,-" iiah 1---8 T T 1 :L-------..r--J,6---T=ai ma-Tr.:1 MSZA ,L___........___,....,., ,....1-1P,'Hmk19::::-.,,a,--A!_rm ow, 0 - I 11 Gisietzeseamikscatge:-:-..--,,, - - ! .•.••N..EN ,rim..gEgo N. I '3a CONTRACTOR•S OPT ICM.... ,.. a 4 REINFORCED oats, ..1/10 ROM• FACED ZAMA 4.5 RONFORCID 0611.SPLIT . • ---C) ••21.1. Wag••al117.:7.7.TM1/277.:41 .1 . •;•••9 MM..Mir iTTI.7.,ry..,,,11%."..."....271111 11111 '.' Ar 1 ik STANDARD.6" MI OCR RUNNING 0 -----,------ ‘..., ' g MErl-1 4 i ji • in gi. ii .....01._ i il i Tp I m. . -, A, • iai IX Oh ::: ros'7:17":5107..rorOnlyNori 0.11.1'.- 413. APPROXIMATE P01111.OF EXISTING 4tuff...IVAD WI1W 511A. MASONRY BUILDING qa v.I '.4 77 4 a 6.1 g2.crUGE,:„.17,10• GALVANISEDMETAL. eo a, _@, smotitil --1 . ON FOR -Et.-ztv., • 6.2 SIR IASI ILIVATI MIAS • LLLLL IS ASHLERS, .' .. . WA r=e0---' • . . 6.3 12'Hid X 24 GAUGE POPINISNED ,...„ . 7. • ARIAL OSCIA._ • P • . • 0 0 T f • T 5.4 WITAL STAIRS.HANDRAIL AND GUARDRAIL AT LANDING,PAINT 5.5 GOAL GRATING AT MARIO 5.6 12'STIES MANNER.PAINTED.NIT•1014 BO.SIDES. . •I 6.7 12' CHAN.,CARVED:PAINT ••:1-- a' -- i-r 1 , , 5.0 SOIL MELLO AMIGO, • I t .)-- • J..r.. 6.9 CURVED.PAIONISHED ANTAL ARCH WITH . . . I •,, 99 1 1 '2 ,.., co.u.a...7.....1.1.r,:ovi,„4...zir c.,.. 13. FINISHED WITII NAVY BCOOD STAIN. \ . . - ..--- . '-- COO WY TO ll•NIGH AT 16.410.7 . (!)ROOF PiI'& §--;-- ROY.SAWN CEDAR TRIM FINISNED WITH NAVY BODIED SIAM• • 0 i . I 1 5:5 , y , ._..„0 ® • ...,.....= .. 11111) .;:;ilii . ,..___,Iminna I _:.__.e..,,,.@,2, :14at_211,M.,.„„., :..1.463,1, 1ir••iiPm-Tisci -,„,"r.+....,-r,-r,-,•-'-.i:=;..^, =! G-e--.- T) • ,,, CEDAR DROP SIDING WITH PIN AD MA• SU LLLLLL.FOR TRANSPARENT STAIN. FINISH RIM AO TRANSPARENT STAIN. , .-.. . ,,,.... 4,6 RECO LLLLL IS ASSEMBLY.SO DITAIL OM -2 M 6.6 ROOD BIMINI BUILDING AND WALL NOT INDICATED. SO 6.9 BILCW. r:.n 4 > d - 6.7 5/0'ROUGH SAIM•0".A01 CLIO PL.=AT BUILDING FAG/10.•101. 5:8, - -I . CUT 10 RADIUS.RINI.RIO HEAVY ®1' - _ - 6.6 NAM CLAD WITH 6/6.12011.SAWN•11.,..Ak,..,-.i- -I '' '-.-I p I GRADE CLEAR CEDAR PLV02.20.FINISH .. .--.1' .,---1 WITH HEAVY.0110 STAIN . II III 6 fl_-. LaPP./841.-0. 6.9 SAM AS 6.2 ABOVE BIND H.R.At MASONRY WALLS.OLDS.1.16L6-A WITH • "B * I•WIDTH. DEM SEAT SECURED INTO -' '" WOOED MASONRY , ... 7.1 ROOFINGS...3RO! i 9 c? -4) c? • /.2 CURS . . ........ 1 (-1? €:14 9 €14 T 7.3 .1CRIT.FORM.F006 SPECIFIED IAATERIAL 7.4 DINGUS SLOE!DCWN 1 7.5 RAISED ROOF FON FUTURE ELIVATOR . 12061-T 'e e i 1 ; eee 19 I I I 7.6 RIDGE 7.7 WAS.SKYLIGHT•DO-CA-I-3676 I. s ___ _ ! . _ • 1 .., lia;i6iTe's=alt:coaR , '6 t • 9.1 5/6"GYPSUM SOARD.TYPICAL ,:,k;.6- •'-'-'- --- 1 @ _€, 9.2 5/9'MOISTURE RESISTANT GYPSUM 1111'II_ _ __._TL11111,1E,,grrei'71 BOARD TYPICAL li 0 9.3 2'X 2.SUSPINDED ACOUSTICAL PANELS -.__ M OFFINISHED STEEL GRID..TYPICAL ' j.1,M Wr.2=--::iNiidill , .d''''''-'r 9.4 SO SECOND FLOOR REFLECTED MEMO 411,-"4".. PLAN - • , ' ...' LLLL 4------------------ .5 GYPSUM BOARD CLAD•dEFX•WALL . 6. ''..?..... .., '" ..' . 16 I OVERFLOW DRAIN TO OPEN IND MAR FINISHED.ADF.TYPICAL-10AB-Oa 1 . , 7••F %•"••1•01 .11TIOR:7.-T.M4.7706: W.L.'- . 22.26 pm!,Mica-ears -....,......c....2 _,..__4 ...... ' 'F-1-1(LD I I I I BEI (01•111MINNOME.• I • . , . - . Z.7:•ErRETE::::•,:::: M. • CD-t. .. 6 zisikEre,,,--:„.„.I Eitmvi_ ft:,:_ ..E-_, ,-)1) . :. .. • _ .,.... '6-4Y 1/230.1.-06 - C) . • 9 (? 6 . MO (!) SECOND FLOOR MA. OEM. PLAN CT)' (2 . ai+, _ . VV.i'- . er, . C •12.-0°A.F, _F 4 I' 1 MI .1,-.6.A.F.F.. I I . . t ---.- . , mt.. . ....r = .. .., . 1 1 I j , r. i • . ,,, „,._ , ....„... . . ...,., irgiinl.--=- • •At4.,,,,.* - _... ;,,..1 6 4 t' 12 VET El 16•426.11.26 "... -MINIIIMIIIIIIIIII, 1 • --.-1'..---=-......N.„-•---- .---731.:23 '''' :, 1 I 'lf _ . , -.. e . 1 (4,-,s.iticitstiR--iluani. 0'filaM4 Mini-+11111 - 1 I . *Ji.... %.,..1.-o*,...„_... - c-4,,zii lei_. •1 _÷_._iii ,---0 .• --1 II I , EL: , - 06 t.'". •;„ . W 8 •...:-,‘. ..ON • a .. I .---- - or] , '9 4?1 (-2 19 e ® Ti 4 9 - .. • -•6 7717 9 -- -• -- - --. I ID P! . criimmig pl. -- 11-.-.--6-• • . . - • ,.. .. D 1 -.1 (:)- ,.• I _ - . q ZI kNwM•/4-ll.i2fo ' i' •lNulji N8..I-..5-,1--- ,!..O,D, -iit.l.s..id,tgE,gN.g,,:, , 1EE:Cfl I -•• - . ME MOINE, 1 1111M1,1 F . mil Oil BE1 CE 114 tie , --I-6-- L , -- •• •--- lser FILCICOA. 11:tiOPIL CEEIL. PLAIlit- . -dLEM a 6- _ • Mar V ,=1,43. - -SCIlLn14' E 11. ,.. • NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: SHANNON'S VILLAGE ' ECF; SA-025-89 Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan approval for an office/retail development. GENERAL LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. NE and Duvall Ave. NE ' PUBLIC APPROVALS: o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further _ information on the application or dates of final action,by the City, please-contact the- --- Planning Division at 235=2550..— _-___ __ .4 )1 .al Crf7 :Lola 203 Ifi1', 1•l'7C>! -- • :I� iQL1 ) ST •• 201 i . ['.1'!_[� ',"i1 ('rr:ING. DEPT. ', 8 1 •1 10 1 12 7 14 101 1 f 19 ty T w I 1 i)rM I I �,� . l ; ,�o2na opv��® yr 4 31 i'. . .5crn c:/'i ar.n . �vtly .,,.� / / / / / •/. S� !,.9rokili' Q . 1 slop 17Alielt id.:),C,ilieey N'v -,1 1 . . ICJ 10 II 12 11 14 IS IG I1 I S/ 3 2 , i Q .: . . . . . z)-Y.t. .,0‘.4- *N: : • '. ."://. C:.... ..0 . Nj . . . • ,• . • • Iv 1 , - -33-vr' . .--, 1• • o ,,t._,,.........--. ..,�,._ �1 __1.�,..t.._._..._� _ - `� i,, i --- - . 5• A SR t • • HIGH SCHOOL : ' .i 1 1- t3 4,s 16 . 7 .p : •I1 II`M__... 9T • Itglle 11.10.L i• — , - L; )i � 4 /1 ? 4I: ri.jw .I1 ... .. I RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: March 28, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: April 11, 1989 ECF-025-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-025-89 PROPONENT: William E. Witt PROJECT TITLE: "Shannon's Village" BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan approval for an office/retail development. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall Ave. N.E. SITE AREA 2 .26 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 20,200 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14. Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-025-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-025-89 PROPONENT: William E. Witt PROJECT TITLE: "Shannon's Village" BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan approval for an office/retail development. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall Ave. N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: April 19, 1989 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON April 11, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 HFC74-C IVI- 10"4'4" p.BMW1=61-' r.csoo N k• M..r.,,Rw17 1-IeW C s..E' 1-,,e4m.ao1ual etau lM J(_ MIIIlIIIIIMUllllMBlllIialliiiiiinkkM111o1111 II rr ro „-." lig % %ii I Lima Z I � ;.r I l� , AM4 — —" At_7Ipe-tti:-PoRTA ei.E•11.7106. (. ^h . dU WllimIII NIA[I! • • ��AIII lIN = 10111.101116A111 LI 11111ii '0 2111 IkvtL "/4'- WICDT X+ s../allotd, u'ct1c.0 grsii•3 r. ,r, , .,/,,,,,z, 4...„.....,, . ' --, Arni !MILANI r ". . Oi . CWILI:21146."F"- WttsT eu v.-ncs-& I ttt-F-saver.0 I Kill Mil 'aU 11...g11-C."4"-Wte 194J4%./Allo1.1 I '1 c RFra 3ddJSQhIr1 • ° ° ° ° 0o ,00°�.�.°.� �.o• O,o.�: o< .o ff.°• •° • ° ° Q ° �} °� o '.ice •�),. .,,, + _ la 8 r'i-nier's 1„.„,„,..„+„nr,,..„7„. jb , _T.,.s.vralre...0 A = 11 J h .d� 9 w y A L , . .Zi1 £ o _-__ 4 - tar% : 'ems;.. —1;;,..yin -_— 1 1 Ii�: p 4Yl4 L>•J}hfi d x',3 wcraeotl S C —__— oL l —_ — .K wad,; /9f✓aded..,nfW oftS -Lr•aec,nlN ��.1n , 'oTid' 3i-r OOG/nrr'II I,"1 �LT x,1 41NT�ntm B�_i� lIi 11 `�CC "4' •av,e Hn•muwtimn.r1IiID a m,a tl 1�,} m» wa i W-,irna/irnMaN I I 0 • ...•-(7:114) __�51d+� ' 41-;LI Ha921m14/v3MLv' LT+.w,,v'- ►' �pV�! I�` . ._00 O.,Or ® _ •`•,•jlv •*o/I. vi-,m em,u rrnr anti O C - J V r J Trltl G}q it Mirrard''all- '0=MHZ1 _ f..,s••M r i14 aZII` ,cl-lU anU wwnu 0' ----- — �r� � I/ •Thl bra.alnnr (il-,xi ,1,H2lri Xll 0 -nra —Ye,' Axaa,.nr 'l-4.r'l"a.1, O Tr.d 1u,T •✓.Pro/slab,,,�1r,f411MmnQ.Va'n,Y 0 2 "'fIJ 4 /•R1C'h"1n111'lOflln 0 'Z WI s°rnaasm r urta 2Taa 1 i„w Ana' r /'m+e+w e as�l 0 • '..500w•'emi. 'i _ .. - ,roar -,7'1' ^++o b /,,olnl`asaa<•rn.vrraaa e . _ •_ Tnd •�.•,4/r,nroaU,LmIn M•urran 'rn'.n © jfllrori era n•neol4 -+6•94 rsnrMMiran 40N D9aelnFlw�<!. y-6O •E4 aVTt'q: 41. . la.o�Y. I.I J i{W"Mu~Oar. PAY VC VP w,rw 4f�- 7-i hIYl15a/nli;`TrH:: Ind. 'ar�`w ro lrurt� 4 ,wr Area! 1 �^I+rVJb dWQ, ig M re, Q { TJ� /.ndtn reflCD) `tC ' Ea19nI,A Hind �r/t-+nra warm O i 6 G'{G T••)rZ /,rMrltrv%HiM1<{r lii.$ .i`yFtl(M'' ..l ..y,'`�{11[7- ' O+FrtbsJ,SH 1[r1y MY `: y' rlT PiY= ��0pZil- -la- ...MN n�M...hriv11 Arsawn,nbrl ✓. nyLy i?drvl,- :, @ R'-, ,1 '_� O1.�..�;J ;t a ,_ N ,fSi:,Fc • 'P. 1 ENTRY CANOPY __ . 6 SCREENED AREA FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT EI.E ANDVATOR SHAFT ^ i="iffili • ••••.-... i ., - yam.f.. - I .i- i? • .�... 151 fIII N MEM . . _ .4. -I N� __. r_; 3 iIIIIIIIIIIIIIII., i •O :IA - -- .74,-,4,-,,e,-.,, .gicw.,;., L-.+ I I -_ IOTiilvq=t1 J SIIECTION A-A SECTION B-B Ur-1'-0• US•-1'-IP t II;jIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII• .I;III I IIII I I R METAL ROOF-SAME COLOR ALL BUILDINGS I I II I 40' IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIIIUr _ • , 'Yw"" WOOD SIDING ` i+ I. - „...,... . SPIV FACE CONCRETE MASONRY � -_ a El DElo 11 II aillil . ,410 I�� _ _;�!I 1 _ _ o c _ - i�1� i1==- • — T - - ----^---•- _ __ I�11 11 J�iI—I _ - WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION 1R•-1'-0•. - LS•-1•-0• I I . ° IIIIIIIIIIIUIIInuIiill °LL- • iiiIIIIIIII UII •- I" I IIIII=•—aIIIU " jUI �I imIl' l � " -'" 'IIIIIIII� I g 0 0 .mi i Ni--- i El 11.•!I ,i.li Ni, I is i, . 1 26- __IM I 1,,, al 1 ct IIMIIII mEngi 111111. .1 . 14 iS IMEi- Ell:111. , 1., = AEI' AI VW W SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION A.3 3 II 1 1„7 7-11- . ! . I, . . .. . , . -77- 7 ==.1. • _ ___ __ _ _ -, ,m______, r __ _ - _ IMI 1=1 I III. . COVERED WAIXWAY--7L.—.7 ' • • ' . \„.1- 1 I i • 1 ' • • . _ . , . : • . , . ... • . . • : wciliFsi - . . • . •- - . • • i . • • . I*1' . --"ET---*-•.*- • . . .. . . . , . . . • . • . • • .... . .. - • •.• , ., •• -. .• • • ..- . ., • =•• . . . -• .••-... : • , . .. . . ..,,.._. .. ., . . . . . . 'If PLAN-RETAIL MALL I • . • ei = i -..,hattone 7: A VILLAGE RECESS FOR SIGNAGE-FLUORESCENT BOXES OF CONSISTENT SIZE- 7 .aeli . :3 m..t. ijy2uDi —AIIIIIIIIklt.illkllIllIllIllKilr6-14gf;4--; STUCCO-SAND FINISH _„,... , spur FACE CONCRETE MASONRY ..a.. METAL ROOF-SAME COLOR ALL BUILDINGS (PROVIDES SCREENING FORMECHANICAL -] A P• 1 1 ll117.7&.43E-. 1 de/WW.ff&-...- .•. .., ,r' .=LI=1:=. d--------=----M i' v t•i m zi a z i a vtu a NI A u vai u u m 14. .A.ii.in-=M Die -.- - 7.7 -o --irl ' . ••••• ••=r100 'NI 1 4 1 * ::. .. :. . ---t:311.11i0111LI:n'- . * . • . Ell -0 :1:1T-. *** '.E1- .:_- .5-,-. -,• . .__1, . 4s . . UNTIS ,_____ .-1 ..•.mm : : ...,......r-,, -_,Imig . r n _ _J. •—• —1 . 1111 '1 al .: .'- 111-EN n . • .5. Im .1=MI IM Inas =. M=M • M. .1 M'.. =I_ ill El a .. .....— -_. .1- -....--= • .. , . .• 8] WEST ELEVATION RETAIL MALL vi4P. • • • • ■ge ■. . + I •- I u SElOOTH ST.. N LEGAL DESCRIPTION FSe 101sT 'NeuTH ST , ,NR N CNN I H T N°r A"'.ii 0 O ..d.: ''u u•:'emu.,.ea.".'.%. _ Oat,4,11%1MI :�NE ATN'^ ST SE IOITH Z ST �• Ilk 11231, I/ T'Ego:"' ,r.I i I • (E�c�•im.u,v,wu. ,•e.�••, Ltt NE ISTH ST I^, : NTONiis �"°�..W .°.,°•.. ,.°°..da..d°•....°.° „ ."3.••: SCALE l".20' \ N 8 .. SE w :_ • 7 I pm. um• �fiW g0 • .° I I1.2sTN ge .7702::: 5::.`.... i_r'ii Ta.s•:�',�•.ot7.41 •/^je"�',1 • y r r. • VICINITY MAP s : wr :� "�.P'rW:" . 1+00 DUV.4LL AVENUE N.E. �w_._.r„.ni.r re �.a.""r..°• w d. •P �' 3+00 Cuo... 0..._+_________+:, '.."'""' • r • S 015921'W '� 2 }• g • '35,...2, 0. ------...m.!,,:\.:14tIONSEMEZZIffin ..., as pi k. . 1411111a -•_.;.. \ rncNlsa .� — '.�T aaau.,,o m r • r a • \ \ 4.11 i i 9 u a ::'! ! .., +Isrq 1 i71+90.61 I • .in..,a.OD $ n..�wmnc_ I p DT a •'..ur LII STORE �: y; u,d an �� u' 1'1 f a' o• f tad 6dc. � �' ao-d\ I CZ IBLDG • %/ �� �� rt t 00 § it___Hm I 3 • ti 2 s tJa N;a,=»:: & R 910..., / i EX. BLDG w 1310 '35' 8i —ads I y 15 eeu '��, • I b r,4 ...Teo Q i s 48, .... N T 1 t• �i li°00/17r6, r I l w.. 9 .J' I a.w., ` a, • ¢ / 7°Dons Z e C /Igaf13 ;II r� pq ..... , .. 21 oat ___ . I` - N 5 • e ..:• ' e-;o-•.-•4,_ __ . •' —, --�awua: cax'.i1.7• • I <iff.:. � rI�•r—_—_ 1 I' _ - -- to ' c c c I w • lD \ `'i,.• nn.uaso wa.°„xss KE-�7•J1_ Md•LL • Jar C°� .� .� . < • '1 ,.:f an..,°en BLDG D n•°,aaa �n • re n.°aos .:p . ` . :urm° — \ mi.e _PARKING " " D N 171 ..m,ccO _ v,a.•..;;`• s.s/l.000 SF Useable Arm m som"' /A qo ATti 46QOB' �,�," sy -oo:.. Imelle Mee A Bldg A-3000 '$ • a®,P^ Bldg B-I300 ren eaa+s-bd1 Bldg B "°° SITE PLAN Ivz Bldg P-1700 _ Perking Require-106 Paling PTa fded-106 1'-20'-0' CC®Pe1s011,-01 • - / 0' / Imo • • M000©O00 000100®00 iiO0O �j A 3 E1 EP ingit C ,y gt� \ a liii ? ; 1 ;Pp 11 1 �iiri z Fe C' • lOgiggi ., k .-- z! iiik . • ° 'p°•�_e �i�•� ,,: t r_ 4' t I,' 1I N o < i = J qp4 pp0 a 50C 0 N. = t °OO'Q /a I,I\`,I.I� "33� 8 ,f+ plp_ _ p R f ' f "p4 F r i 6 �- Y • ,IIII I.II'IIiII �:IIIII'A,'I I ` I (r 3 �`� S'a Js • r ..__.a_ v F F F F FaJm Fa o J F g g i :03I III..: '1 o,ft _:�. `t ``.� • . I u. g ?' � Ic% 4 ;. ,114-i o r. ,��:1 .i I 1 e • • o I' ' ��'► 4,* or°p''7 �, w °sue • ,. pa , ,al ,• l ! r • �_ .' 1 •:' i' r"• ••.••''0 1:01• ,,0 • . I - n 'O�� ya 'p ry .#I R � li! r oI 1 , i ., , g ?a :.! - "' % I I I •..O IA���lllllll11I 11 II ' .. _m ..4 :I' � • Y�+ . s' 1i�.. :IF' I©e !:I 9 O .'ri''' ' .-..4t. -I h 1 I 1 .k.--. .4,0.1 a 1 _ I iY. I • ,I oa = q �\ i���16:, imp I • - il• .•- ,1a s{ • ,40" i, �: t O,. e:':ba 1-,ilHz 4� ' • •\'I se• • i mmlipapnhl I III II III i I III 0 #I�G,,`.�Qil 1_ MIIIIIIIIIIIIII1III 1 I, 1II' AI• • Ys • • r• Shannon's Village WILLIAM ARCHITECT Building"B" anion,wa BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE 6 A SW' gq O25 _. 1, 1 CITY F RENTON "LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator July 19, 1991 GnElatos CN GEC(OF Penelope Hepworth 91991 1702 Duvall Avenue NE \VE ,.� Renton, WA 98055 rye SUBJ: Progress Payments Building Permit No. B-16175 1702 Duvall Avenue NE Dear Ms. Hepworth: Per our conversation today, please be advised that I agree to authorize three incremental payments of one-third each to you against the $15, 000 cash bond paid by you to assure completion of the project. The payments will be based on progress of construction as determined by myself after inspection. Please call me at 277-6180 if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, onald G. Nelson Building Official Development Services Division RGN:mjp cc: Jim Hanson Don Erickson rgn#11/Hepworth 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 SAr_ GJ�� I degaezi Ce* /"/ PLANNING DIVISION 'ZIVA(- 16€14) CITY OF RENTON MAY - 6 1991 • 1 "P ECEIV ED I _.Fet I ! PLANNING DIVISION � ( _ e _ DEC 1 2 1990 • s. �� ' III r. b1 VF. P/1\‘*tiattnott's ON CORNER OF SUNSET BOULEVARD a DUVALL IN RENTON HIGHLANDS December 10th, 1990 Mr. Don Erickson Building/Planning Dept. 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Penelope's Flowers remodeling at Shannon's Village Dear Mr. Erickson, Pursuant to our recent conversation regarding the scheduling of the work to be completed at Penelopes Country Flowers (1702 Duvall Ave N.E. ) , in talking with Bob Hepworth (Penelope's husband) he informed me that the work would commence on or before January 15th, 1991 and would be completed on or before April 30th, 1991 . Early emphasis will be given to completing that part of the work most desired by the City of per site plan discussions, such as painting, and West and South covered walkways and metal roofing to match adjacent structures. The agreement between Bob and I call for me providing funding of $7,000 to provide for purchase of materials and commencement of work. This would provide for approximately one third of total work to be completed. Bob Hepworth after inspection by you or other designated City personnel would request release of additional $7500 to continue the work. There would be a second inspection and subsequent release of the balance of $7500 held by the City. Upon completion of work there would be a final inspection and release of occupancy permit holds. Mr. Erickson, I am working on the premise that this procedure meets your approval , if there is a problem or suggestion, please call me immediately; otherwise I will presume that we are commencing construction right after the first of the ear. Sincerely, '/ diPP S �! A LONE "D ' C�f PA EVELOPMENTv! I 5919 119TH AVE. S.E. BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98006 • 746-5656 sA- o2S — ��J • 0\I \I•, gg ri ^ =I � I �_ - irI � ,; ; III (*flan/tuns Village ON CORNER OF SUNSET BOULEVARD & DUVALL IN RENTON HIGHLANDS PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON a 3 1990 November 30th, 1990 E ,A ,d `Erj Mr. Don Erickson, Planning Division City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Penelope's Country Flowers Dear Mr. Erickson, This letter is a follow-up to our recent telephone conversation regarding the agreed upon work to be completed on Penelope's tenant space in Shannon's Village. Although, I realize that from a physical point of view work has not commenced since the building permit was issued, progress is in fact being made. This progress comes in three areas; 1 ) the attorneys representing Penelope's and Shannon's Village are finally completing- the construction agreement spelling out who is responsible for what and when, 2) I am working on the closing of a real estate transaction, the proceeds from which the balance of funds needed to finance the project (including the money the City holds) can be drawn, and 3) passage of the holiday season which is a large part of Penelope's annual business will allow the Hepworths the opportunity to devote the time required to complete the work. I am committed to our agreement and for my part will perform as per that agreement. We intend to commence the work right after the first of the year and it is my understanding that the work will be finished soon thereafter. Your recommendation of putting the $15,000 in an escrow account is fine with me providing we can work out the details of payment with Hepworth. In so much as progress is in fact being made, and commitments have been made, I ask that you allow Express Wok (Suite A, 1630 Duvall Ave N.E.) to open when their improvement work is completed approximately A LONE "D" COMPANY, INC., DEVELOPMENT 5919 119TH AVE. S.E. BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98006 • 746-5656 December 8th. Even with their opening, we still have four spaces to lease representing 18% of the total center. This creates a negative cash flow, an unacceptable marketing situation and a good situation for you to assure that the work is completed as I have pledged my every efforts to see that it is. As I mentioned to you on the phone, it is important that the City and Shannon's Village continue to work toward our common goal . For your support, I will make sure that commitments are kept and that the City will not be left holding an empty bag. I will be contacting you soon with hope of setting up a meeting between you, I, and Hepworth to discuss the workable application of your escrow idea. Thank You. Sincerely, C. Kelly O'Neil , Vice-Presient Shannon's Village CITY OF RENTON Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator September 5, 1990 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON C. Kelly O'Neil SEP - 5 1990 1640 Duvall Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 RECEIVED SUBJ: 30 Day Temporary Occupancy Permit Extension Shannon's Village 1630 Duvall Avenue NE Building Permit No. B-15587 Temporary Occupancy Permit T-2149 Dear Mr. O'Neil: I reviewed your August 31, 1990 letter requesting a 30 day extension of your temporary occupancy permit which expires September 5, 1990. You indicate that you conducted a meeting attended by tenants, landlord, and respective legal counsels which resulted in a compromise agreed to by all. You stated that you now need additional time to resubmit plans to the City for approval and to commence the work. Your request is both valid and acceptable, therefore, I hereby grant a 30 day extension of your temporary occupancy permit. Said extension will commence on September 5, 1990 and expire on October 5, 1990. A word of caution - please make sure that the plans are approved by the City, the required permit issued, and the work completed within this 30 day period granted by the extension. If you have any questions or need additional information please contact me at 277-6180. Sincerely, // Ronald G. Nelson Building Official Construction Field Services RGN:mjp cc: Donald K. Erickson James. C. Hanson rgntt6/T-2149 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton. Washineton 98055 - T16-'7f l CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: August 8, 1990 TO: File SA-025-89, Shannon's Village FRO : on Erickson, AICP oning Administrator SUBJECT: Meeting August 8, 1990, with Kelly O'Neil re: Bldg"F" I met this morning with Kelly O'Neil and William Witt, his architect, to discuss further design modifications that Kelly was requesting. Because of the fact that he saw the arcade/porch on the west and south side of the building as tenant improvements which were to be done by the Hepworths, he wants to delete these and have the blue metal mansard roof supported directly off the roof of the existing building. He also wants to delete the extension of the mansard roof to the east by the garden/greenhouse area because of cost constraints. I told Mr. Kelly and Mr. Witt that I would support the revisions they were talking about, but noted that the revised roof would have to have returns on the north side (as seen from Duvall) and on the east side of the building to create a transition back (as seen from the south) to the existing roof line. It was also agreed that a pedimented gate/arch would continue to be provided on the west facade, although it would be brought out four or five feet from the building face to create greater contrasts. A fair amount of discussion resolved around the pedimented gate/arch on the south side of the building and its placement. Whereas it was agreed that this element could be freestanding, Kelly initially felt that it should be located in the center of the south wall or even deleted. Bill Witt and I felt that it was an important visual element that helped break up the southern facade as well as provided thematic continuity to Building "F", with the rest of the shopping center to the south. Once it was decided to keep this feature (I noted that actually two gateways had been indicated at one time and the drawings reviewed and approved by the Hearing Examiner always showed one!), our discussion focused on its placement on the site. Bill Witt and I felt that it should be sited to the east of the existing building to help screen any eventual enclosure that the Hepworths might propose around their garden area. It was agreed to site it far enough to the east that it could serve as a gate or entranceway into the "greenhouse" area, if the Hepworths so chose. Such a location would also ensure that it would be visible from the south. We agreed that it need not be physically connected to the mansard roof of the"F" Building, but rather, could be free-standing. Another issue discussed had to do with the materials that the pedimented gateways would be constructed of. Whereas Larry Springer and I had talked about possibly stucco, to match the split face block used on Building"C", Bill Witt and Kelly O'Neil felt that the four inch horizontal cedar siding used on the bank would be just appropriate, given the relatively small areas and the cost of"getting someone out to stucco them." I agreed to the use of the cedar siding material for the pedimented gates, if it matched wood used elsewhere in the shopping center. The last issue pertained to landscaping. I requested that since the porch in front of the building was to be deleted, that permanent landscaping be installed. Bill Witt thought Mrs. Hepworth might want to display plants in this area, but I said we had no guarantee on her tenancy and that without the arcade, we would like to see larger, permanent evergreen shrubs, such as rhodys, in this area. In closing the meeting, I asked that revised drawings, pursuant to today's meeting, be drawn up as soon as possible so that I could review them before they were submitted for building review. I reiterated to Kelly O'Neil the importance of getting this work completed so that their final occupancy permits could be issued. ` CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: August 6, 1990 TO: Files CFROM: Don Erickson,AICP Principal Planner SUBJECT: Penelope's Flower Shop Building Site Plan Improvements I met this afternoon with Kelly O'Neil to discuss the drawings that had been submitted for my review by the Hepworths on August 3, 1990. Kelly was very concerned about who was going to pay for what and noted that although the City had a bond for $15,000, he thought the improvements shown would exceed this amount. He stated that Ms. Hepworth was given $7,500 by him for building improvements and he expected this to be used for the types of improvements shown in the drawing. He called my attention to the fact that an earlier drawing Ms. Hepworth had prepared did show a lattice roof line similar to a mansard and also showed an arcade with columns. He also felt that the decorative applique was excessive and agreed with me that it was inappropriate on the pedimented gateways. I explained to Mr. O'Neil that, in my opinion,the mansard treatment did not, in this case, need to be carried around the whole building but rather,.the Duvall facade and the southern facade with a return on the east and north sides for transition. I explained that this should reduce costs as well. Mr. O'Neil stated that their temporary occupancy for the shopping center was going to expire in early September and he wondered if the City would allow full occupancy if they were showing progress in resolving the design issues with Building 'F'. I stated in no uncertain terms to Kelly that, in my opinion, the City would not allow full occupancy, that this issue had already gone on for a number of months and eaten up a large amount of staff time already. I said that as a minimum, I thought the City would expect him to have had prepared, and submitted, building plans for the modifications as well as extended his surety device for$15,000 if the City were even going to extend the temporary occupancy permit. Mr. O'Neil said he would do what he could to get the building plans ready for submittal. CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: August 6, 1990 TO: Files FRO Don Erickson,AICP Principal Planner SUBJECT: Meeting with Penelope Hepworth,August 3, 1990 I met on Friday, August 3, 1990, with Penelope Hepworth and her husband to discuss revisions to the building they apparently lease from Kelly O'Neil. The Hepworths brought in a plan that showed the changes they would like to see to the building to make it consistent with the Hearing Examiner's recommendations. They submitted two sets of drawings. One set showed the revised roof line with a blue metal mansard roof to match that of the other buildings in the center,as well as pediment style gateways at the center of the west facade of the building, as well as along the south facade and at the east elevation of the building at the entrance into the garden area. This last decorative pediment archway was not required by the City. The second set of drawings showed decorative elements overlaying the superstructure of the building and gateways shown in the first set of drawings. Extensive gingerbread applique was shown over the decorative gateways and at the tops of the columns. In addition, a decorative railing was provided around the arcade area. Penelope explained that an eight foot step was required and the railing was to help control access and prevent people from stumbling. After discussing the changes, I made it known to the Hepworths that the City felt good about the revised roof line with the mansard roof and pedimented gateways. I noted that it was nice to see this feature carried over to the back of the building, but noted that this was not required by the City or Hearing Examiner. Staff also noted that the decorative applique on these gateways was inappropriate and should be deleted. I indicated that the decorative brackets at the top of the columns was probably alright, if they could be easily removed, and suggested that the fence railing sections would likely also be acceptable, depending on color and removability. Penelope stated that she thought the changes I was requesting were reasonable and noted that she now understood the difference between shopping center architecture and tenant improvements. I requested copies of the materials that the Hepworths had brought to the meeting and noted that I would try to set up a meeting with Kelly O'Neil for the first part of the week of August 6th. CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: August 6, 1990 TO: Files FROM:(1' Don Erickson,AICP �(�/Principal Planner SUBJECT: Penelope's Flower Shop Building Site Plan Improvements I met this afternoon with Kelly O'Neil to discuss the drawings that had been submitted for my review by the Hepworths on August 3, 1990. Kelly was very concerned about who was going to pay for what and noted that although the City had a bond for $15,000, he thought the Improvements shown would exceed this ' amount. He stated that Ms. Hepworth was given $7,500 by him for building improvements and he expected this to be used for the types of improvements shown in the drawing. He called my attention to the fact that an earlier drawing Ms. Hepworth had prepared did show a lattice roof line similar to a mansard and also showed an arcade with columns. He also felt that the decorative applique was excessive and agreed with me that it was inappropriate on the pedimented gateways. I explained to Mr. O'Neil that, in my opinion,the mansard treatment did not, in this case, need to be carried around the whole building but rather, the Duvall facade and the southern facade with a return on the east and north sides for transition. I explained that this should reduce costs as well. Mr. O'Neil stated that their temporary occupancy for the shopping center was going to expire in early September and he wondered if the City would allow full occupancy if they were showing progress In resolving the design issues with Building 'F'. I stated in no uncertain terms to Kelly that, in my opinion, the City would not allow full occupancy, that this issue had already gone on for a number of months and eaten up a large amount of staff time already. I said that as a minimum, I thought the City would expect him to have had prepared, and submitted, building plans for the modifications as well as extended his surety device for$15,000 if the City were even going to extend the temporary occupancy permit. Mr. O'Neil said he would do what he could to get the building plans ready for submittal. CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: August 6, 1990 TO: Files FROM �5 Don Erickson,AICP �• Principal Planner SUBJECT: Meeting with Penelope Hepworth,August 3, 1990 I met on Friday, August 3, 1990, with Penelope Hepworth and her husband to discuss revisions to the building they apparently lease from Kelly O'Neil. The Hepworths brought In a plan that showed the changes they would like to see to the building to make It consistent with the Hearing Examiner's recommendations. They submitted two sets of drawings. One set showed the revised roof line with a blue metal mansard roof to match that of the other buildings in the center,as well as pediment style gateways at the center of the west facade of the building,as well as along the south facade and at the east elevation of the building at the entrance into the garden area. This last decorative pediment archway was not required by the City. The second set of drawings showed decorative elements overlaying the superstructure of the building and gateways shown in the first set of drawings. Extensive gingerbread applique was shown over the decorative gateways and at the tops of the columns. In addition,'a decorative railing was provided around the arcade area. Penelope explained that an eight foot step was required and the railing was to help control access and prevent people from stumbling. After discussing the changes, I made it known to the Hepworths that the City felt good about the revised roof line with the mansard roof and pedimented gateways. I noted that it was nice to see this feature carried over to the back of the building, but noted that this was not required by the City or Hearing Examiner. Staff also noted that the decorative applique on these gateways was inappropriate and should be deleted. I indicated that the decorative brackets at the top of the columns was probably alright, if they could be easily removed, and suggested that the fence railing sections would likely also be acceptable, depending on color and removability. Penelope stated that she thought the changes I was requesting were reasonable and noted that she now understood the difference between shopping center architecture and tenant improvements. I requested copies of the materials that the Hepworths had brought to the meeting and noted that I would try to set up a meeting with Kelly O'Neil for the first part of the week of August 6th. CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTP(,0 MEMORANDUM CI t NTH o/ ,iljni 5 DATE: June 24, 1990 Vet) TO: Larry Springer, Planning Manager FROM:lilt Don Erickson, Principal Planner SUBJECT: Shannon's Village Site Plan Review Compliance Last Friday, you caught me and suggested that we may need to sit down and take another look at Penelope's Flowers and what can be done to make this comply with the Site Plan Review conditions, without taking it back to the Hearing Examiner. Since we have already done this twice, and the applicants are not willing to accept even the revised elements even though a $10,000.00 bond or surety was posted for this purpose, I believe the applicant should either go back through the Site Plan Review process before the Hearing Examiner or consider seeking a variance from the requirements based upon hardship, and the fact that the existing house does not easily lend itself to revision. In either case, procedure would be to take the project back before the Hearing Examiner for resolution. I think the Examiner would be more supportive of the changes if he thought there was, indeed, a unique hardship that had not been brought up at hearing. I would like to discuss this further with you on Monday. Thanks. DE:kac 1 / t tme I Slutl os ,‘ RESTRICTIVE COVENANT for SHANNON'S VILLAGE BUSINESS PARK Sunset Boulevard and Duval Avenue Renton, Washington The Owners , and Developers of Shannon's Village Business Park, do, herein restrict, by Covenant, all additions to , or exterior remodeling of the developed "Site" as shown on Site Plans , dated May 3 , 1989 subject to approval by the City of Renton of said additions and/or exterior remodeling, based upon a) the existing dense level of development upon the site; b) the proximity of residential development; c) the existing and anticipated heavy utilization of adjacent roadways; and 4) the anticipated limited capacity of sanitary sewers to handle new developments . The "Site" includes that property known as "Shannon's Village" located at Sunset Boulevard and Duval Avenue in Renton, Washington, legally described as: PARCEL A: The north 80 feet of Tract 4 , Joseph P. Marshall Tracts , according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 38 of Plats , page 30, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed for road by deed recorded under Recording Number 8010270488. PARCEL E ,,.... The south 82. 99 feet of the north 162 . 99 feet of Joseph P. Marshall Tracts , Tract No. 4 , according to the plat thereof recorded in volume 38 of Plats , page 30 , in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed for road by deed recorded under Recording // Number 8010270488. PARCEL C: Tract 4 , Joseph P. Marshall Tracts , according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 38 of Plats , page 30 , in // King County' Washington; EXCEPT the north 162. 99 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed for road by deed recorded under Recording Number 8010270488. PARCEL p: Tract 4-A, Joseph P. Marshall Tracts , according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 38 of Plats , page 30 , in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion thereof described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the easterly margin of 138th Avenue Southeast as conveyed to the State of Washington for Primary State Highway No. 2 , by deed recorded under Recording Number 7109200153 with a line 135 feet northwesterly of as measured at right angles to the centerline of said Primary State Highway No. 2; thence north 76 26 '00" east parallel with said centerline, a distance of 110. 00 feet to a point hereafter referred to as Point "A" ; thence south 13 34 '00" east, 110. 00 feet to the northerly margin of said Primary State Highway No. 2; • thence south 76 26 '00" west, 5. 79 feet to an angle point in said northerly margin; , thence south 84 57 '51" west, 101. 12 feet to an angle point in said northerly margin; thence north 25 38 '11" west, 67. 15 feet to an angle point on the easterly margin of said 138th Avenue Southeast; thence north 4 58 '22 east, 30. 94 feet to the point of beginning; AND EXCEPT those portions conveyed for roads by deeds recorded under Recording Numbers 7109200153 and 8010270488. C. Kelly O 'N-il, Vice President '+ Lone D Company, Inc. a + ; • • • j•l r., r- ''i;i.. ,`i....: '? l' ,, :JT i, ._I', •- it - • • • • • 31 Uln . . l�9 . D , . . , . 7 . . . a i. ... ,. . ,. .. . . ..,. . . i ,_, s.t,„,,,,,,,,....,...4.... .s . . .. . . . .„.:,,, ,,..,.; . ,...... . . " . w .,, . . , . . .•. . . . . . • . . • . . .. , . • . . . • • . . ,, . . , . . . , . . . . „ ... _ . . • • . . , . . . . ... • . . .,•.. , .. . . _, . . .„ ., ,. . .• . , . . . . . • _. . . ; .. . . . • . " .„ . . . . . . . . , • . • • . . . .. . „ . . . . ._ . . . ... . •. , , . .,. „... . . C . . .. . . . , . , . • •, • . . .._ ,„ •• . .• , .. • • ,.. .„. ,. . . ... . . . . . . , , . . . , .• • . .. . . . . . . . . . . . ,.•. .. .. . . . , ... . ... • . . . .• . . . . . . .. . . . . . . • . • .. . .. ; . ... . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . • • . . . . . .... . . . ., " . • , , . . . . . . . , • . . . ... . ,. . . • . . .. . .... . . .. .. . • . • • .. . . . . . . . . .. . ........ . . .. . . . . . ., . , .• . , , , . . .., . . , . . . . . . . . . . . ... • . . , . . . . . . ._ .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . , . . , . . s , . . .. . . ... . . .. , . . . . ,. . , . .. • .. . • • . , , .., , . • . . • . ...... . . , . . . ..., • • . , . .. .. .._ . . , . .. . .... •, .. . . ... • 0 of• rf I ,i•,\\ 1 1 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING On this I day of :Sow-7 . 19 Rot, before me, on the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared C. Kelly O 'Neil, to me known to be the President of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written. 06101- Notary Public for e State of Washington Expires `72-1-13 05/03/89 09:56 Z 206 624 4126 PIONEER SQ SECR 01 JILLIAM WITT ARCHITECT AIA PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON MAY 3 1989 -15) AECEIVE J City of Renton Building and Zoning Department RE: Revised Administrative Site Plan Approval for SHANNON'S VILLAGE Renton, Wa. 5•3.89 oikttn: Attached are two copies of the Shannon's Village Site/Landscape plan and sketches of buildings "A" and "F" with the following revisions: 1. Site lighting has been added in the form of 4 - 12' pole mounted lights as located on the plan. Other site lighting is also indicated on the plan. 2. Modifications to Building "A" are to include: A. Metal roofing screening around Mechanical equipment at E& W. Ends of building. B. Modifications to entry consisting of removal of at least upper portions of entry *frame" and the addition of a gable clement at the entry. 3. Modifications to building "F" (currently Penelope's Flowers) consisting of Lattice roof extension,gabled entry element, and gabled open display structure. Sincerely, (Jekt1,4 William Witt 219 FIRST AVE.S. SUTTE NO.2111 til,AI.11E,WA 98104 (208)882-1180 1011 S Mr. Mark A. Erhart June 12 , 1990 Page 2 Because of the these conditions--and the City' s Comprehensive Plan policy (Urban Design, Land Development B8) which encourages development that is harmonious in intensity and architectural design within a district--it would seem unlikely that the revisions proposed by Penelope' s would be approved by the Site Plan Review Committee since it would not be harmonious in architectural design with the rest of the commercial complex. However, should you desire to apply for site plan approval we will do all we can to expedite your application. If you have questions regarding this letter or would like more information regarding the site plan approval process, please feel free to contact me or Laureen Nicolay at 235- 2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Chief, Current Planning Division DKE/ln enclosures cc: determination file DKE correspondence ./ile SA-ECF-025-89 DELUXE - FORM WVC-2 V-2 ZC---'q DATE I DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 6/4/90 City of Renton Penelopes Country Flowers Holdback as per agreement $14,500 `)-' V-2 `• C f DUPLICATE RECEIPT DUPLICATE RECEIPT CITY OF REI'ITON CITY TREASURER REG/RCPT : 02-08129 06-05-1990 • CASHIER ID : H 11:12 am 7057 UNKNOWN ACCOUNT $14,500.00 SHANNON'S VILL SITE PLN IMPLEM goy r737 9'�9 9 9:99.9n 9,$ ,99999? coo. TOTAL DUE $14r500.00 RECEIVED FROM: LONE D CO CHECK $14,500.00 TOTAL TENDERED $14I500.illl CHANGE DUE $0.00 DUPLICATE RECEIPT DUPLICATE RECEIPT 4-3 CITY OF RENTON mil A Community Development Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Kenneth E.Nyberg,Director PI 1ING June 11, 1990 C/�OFRE.1 N J(/N7 y99 Fantastic Sams '0 1630 Duvall Avenue NE #C Renton, WA 98055 SUBJ: Shannon's Village 1630 Duvall Avenue NE Building Permit No. B-15587 Temporary Occupancy Permit T-2149 Dear Tenant: A temporary 90 day occupancy permit was issued to the owner, Shannon O'Neil, for the above referenced project. That permit will expire on September 5, 1990. Since you are a tenant in Shannon's Village I feel it is necessary to apprise you of this situation. If the owner does not complete the project and obtain a permanent occupancy permit as required then it will be necessary to vacate all tenants from the subject building until said work is completed and a permanent occupancy permit issued. The City Planning staff is currently working with the owner to accomplish compliance. However, in the event the work is not completed, tenant vacation can become a reality. Please contact me at 277-6180 if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Ronald G. Nelson Building and Housing Manager RGN:mjp cc: Ken Nyberg Larry Springer Don Erickson RGN#5:tenants 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 4.46)rx% CITE OF RENTON Community Development Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Kenneth E.Nyberg,Director June 11, 1990 D. J.'s Sportscards & Comics 1630 Duvall Avenue NE #D Renton, WA 98055 SUBJ: Shannon's Village 1630 Duvall Avenue NE Building Permit No. B-15587 Temporary Occupancy Permit T-2149 Dear Tenant: A temporary 90 day occupancy permit was issued to the owner, Shannon O'Neil, for the above referenced project. That permit will expire on September 5, 1990. Since you are a tenant in Shannon's Village I feel it is necessary to apprise you of this situation. If the owner does not complete the project and obtain a permanent occupancy permit as required then it will be necessary to vacate all tenants from the subject building until said work is completed and a permanent occupancy permit issued. The City Planning staff is currently working with the owner to accomplish compliance. However, in the event the work is not completed, tenant vacation can become a reality. Please contact me at 277-6180 if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Itonald G. Nelson Building and Housing Manager RGN:mjp cc: Ken Nyberg Larry Springer Don Erickson RGN#5:tenants • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 • • CITY OF RENTON Community Development Department . P Earl Clymer, Mayor Kenneth E.Nyberg,Director June 11, 1990 Renton Hills Video 1630 Duvall Avenue NE #E Renton, WA 98055 SUBJ: Shannon's Village 1630 Duvall Avenue NE Building Permit No. B-15587 Temporary Occupancy Permit T-2149 Dear Tenant: A temporary 90 day occupancy permit was issued to the owner, Shannon O'Neil, for the above referenced project. That permit will expire on September 5, 1990. Since you are a tenant in Shannon's Village I feel it is necessary to apprise you of this situation. If the owner does not complete the project and obtain a permanent occupancy permit as required then it will be necessary to vacate all tenants from the subject building until said work is • completed and a permanent occupancy permit issued. The City Planning staff is currently working with the owner to accomplish compliance. However, in the event the work is,not completed, tenant vacation can become a reality. Please contact me at 277-6180 if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Ronald G. Nelson Building and Housing Manager . RGN:mjp cc: Ken Nyberg Larry Springer Don Erickson RGN#5:tenants • I 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON Community Development Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Kenneth E.Nyberg,Director • June 11, 1990 Kim Chung 1630 Duvall Avenue NE #H Renton, WA 98055 SUBJ: Shannon's Village 1630 Duvall Avenue NE Building Permit No. B-15587 Temporary Occupancy Permit T-2149 Dear Tenant: A temporary 90 day occupancy permit was issued to the owner, Shannon O'Neil, for the above referenced project. That permit will expire on September 5, 1990 and allows occupancy until the remainder of the work on-site is complete and a permanent occupancy permit is obtained. Since you are a tenant in Shannon's Village I feel it is necessary to apprise you of this situation. If the owner does not complete the project and obtain a permanent occupancy permit as required then it will be necessary to vacate all tenants from the subject building until said work is completed and a permanent occupancy permit issued. The City Planning staff is currently working with the owner to accomplish compliance. However, in the event the work is not completed, the tenant vacation will become a reality. Please contact me at 277-6180 if you have any questions or need additional information. i • Sincerely, • onald G. Nelson Building and Housing Manager RGN:mjp i . cc: Ken Nyberg Larry Springer Don Erickson RGN#5:tenants 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 A FY/ •! CITY 3F RENTON Community Development Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Kenneth E.Nyberg,Director PLANNING DIVISION June 12, 1990 CITY OF RENTON JUN 1 2 1990 RECEIVED Mark A. Erhart Davis Wright Tremaine 2600 Century Square 1501 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1688 RE: Proposed Exterior Remodel--Penelope's Country Flower Shop, 1702 Duvall Avenue NE Dear Mr. Erhart: This letter is sent in response to your inquiry of.May 31, 1990, concerning the process necessary for obtaining City approval of the above-referenced remodeling project. Since the exterior design of the building currently leased by Penelope' s Country Flower Shop was approved by the City' s Site Plan Review Committee in conjunction with the Shannon' s Village site plan approval (City file number SA-ECF-025-89) , any new construction/remodeling must be done in accordance with the approved site plan(s) unless an amended site plan approval application is submitted to and approved by the City. Section 4-31-33 (f) of the City of Renton Municipal Code requires that adjustments to an approved site plan be done only through an amended application which must be processed in the same manner as the originally approved site plan. This would require taking the entire Shannon' s Village shopping center back to the Site Plan Review Committee. Additionally, restrictive covenants (enclosed) reaffirming these restrictions were also placed as conditions of the development's approval. Condition #2 of these covenants states that the site must be developed in accordance with the approved 1989 plan, including the " . . . architectural integration of Buildings "A" and "F" (the building presently occupied by Penelope' s County Flower Shop) into the site plan for the development as a whole so as to be thematically compatible with Buildings "B" and Building "D" . . . " . 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton. Washington 9Ro55 Mr. Mark A. Erhart June 12 , 1990 Page 2 Because of the these conditions--and the City' s Comprehensive Plan policy (Urban Design, Land Development B8.) which encourages development that is harmonious in intensity and architectural design within a district--it would seem unlikely that the revisions proposed by Penelope' s would be approved by the Site Plan Review Committee since it would not be harmonious in architectural design with the rest of the commercial complex. However, should you desire to apply for site plan approval we will do all we can to expedite your application. If you have questions regarding this letter or would like more information regarding the site plan approval process, please feel free to contact me or Laureen Nicolay at 235- 2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Chief, Current Planning Division DKE/ln enclosures cc: determination file DKE correspondence file SA-ECF-025-89 • CITY OF RENTON Community Development Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Kenneth E.Nyberg,Director June 11, 1990 (34‘ 9x.,04/ Mr. Kelly O'Neil ; TT 1630 Duvall Avenue NEB `9iS'0 Renton, WA 98055 ® SUBJ: Shannon's Village 1630 Duvall Avenue NE • Building Permit No. B-15587 Temporary Occupancy Permit T-2149 Dear Mr. O'Neil:. Enclosed please find the temporary 90 day certificate of occupancy which expires September 5, 1990 for the above referenced project. Your cash bond.of $15,000.00 is being held as security to guarantee the completion of the remaining portions of the project. In order to obtain the permanent certificate of occupancy, the following options are available to you: 1. Complete the exterior remodel of the flower shop as originally submitted and approved. 2. Obtain Planning Division approval for minor modifications of the flower shop remodel plans. 3. Apply to the Hearing Examiner for a modification to your site plan which would allow the flower shop to remain as it is. Bear in mind that there is a limited time,(90 days - until September 5, 1990) in which to accomplish project completion (e.g. one of the above three options). Therefore, immediate action on your part is critical. If the work is not complete by the expiration date of the temporary certificate and a permanent occupancy certificate has not been issued, be aware that all tenants will be required to evacuate the premises until it is. A notice to that effect will be sent to each tenant so that they are properly apprised of the situation. • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 • Shannon's Village June 11, 1990 Page 2 The Planning Staff is very willing to assist you in your efforts to complete the project but a firm direction and commitment on your part is necessary and essential. Sincerely, Ronald G. Nelson Building and Housing Manager RGN:mjp cc: Ken Nyberg Larry Springer Don Erickson RGN#5:B-15587 !Ilk I' MEMORAND 1 To % �� ���RIYI�C. Date a_1------LW From , `� Subject b kwo 1 - �� g "1 FOKE uU rrt-i ?D I L1, ►-- -(i t6\RGH k.,I VOCZ -11- i :. i . MEMORANDUM T o _- L/Afi'i'g ap\--3R 111.E` 6K, Date c.,7' 610 From cKK [ L ik)D Subject -�� �0lU`_-� VIILJ/ C'�J - \%W(iopt)ic:bOO\ gf4 4:2 7C'KE; V/0 1-0-4 niLL .-EDAv D NCc C 1)1 / 1c1)t \) D 1 O Vokyy1 0 Yvl 1‘t i T Cos i eC -46 I )o,0o0,- L --wwwww...... pppow........................ H i • tc—Trlis . • I- IM 4 MP glilillitir ..,. • . •• • . • .i. . .• I' - ' ' . $' • , r i - %i • - -..*„ .i. ,. , •.„' . . ,., . * - 4:-: • 1, ...!.. . t ...". r i" `-• .i- . - -, . . ..... • ..• . • ' A, •. •I• ot . . . _....1.... ........ . . III I:. _t.....:1-44c, li.......„1.,.....„ r VI .010 ter: • a MNY8A5b d JS Y �• a CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 3 }+AW100V')S \ L kot ?:40'TD& MPH, 3 ..cto la, CITY OF RENTON "LL FINANCE DEPARTMENT s Earl Clymer, Mayor. Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk August 14, 1989 IA Lone D Development Company 5919 - 119th Avenue S. E. Bellevue, WA 98006 Re: Restrictive Covenant for Shannon's Village Business Park File No. SA-025-89 Enclosed for your files is a copy of the above-referenced Restrictive Covenant. This document has been filed with the King County Recorder and the number is shown on this copy. Very truly yours, The City of Renton Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk MEM/adk Enclosure 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 ti 4 • BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS July 26, 1989 Page 2 some neighbors wanted the sidewalks because of the many children living in the area. Chair Guttmann advised the even though the applicant is required to accomplish improvements under the development plan, the neighbors would not be impacted unless a local improvement district for the entire area was formed. Motion: Moved by PARNESS, seconded by NYBERG, that based on the following reasons there is no justification which would negate those requirements mandated by law or City policy and procedure: a) improvements were the subject of considerable discussion which included appeals through the Hearing Examiner and City Council; b) there no technical reasons which would substantiate not installing curb, gutter and sidewalks; d) there are schools in the neighborhood and concern/interest has been expressed about providing a safer sidewalk system for the children; and, e) while we recognize installation of improvements might engender concerns in the neighbors, it does not directly impact them. MOTION CARRIED Note: The applicant returned toward the end of the meeting and advise Board members that this decision would prevent her from recording the Short Plat. Due to the fact that she had not mentioned, nor included the information about recording the short plat in the application, the matter was re-reviewed and it was moved by PARNESS, seconded by NYBERG, to approve a temporary deferral of the off-site improvements to coincide with the construction; and, that occupancy of the building will not be allowed until all improvements are installed. Based on the fact that the improvements being deferred are standard and do not require detailed analysis, and the fact that occupancy is being withheld until improvements are constructed, the standard requirement for detailed plans prior to issuance of occupancy can be waived conditioned upon a report being submitted by the applicant outlining the estimated costs for installing improvements. The estimate would then be approved by the Public Works staff and the bond amount set; and, within the required 30-day time frame. MOTION CARRIED On-Off Site Improvement Deferral Extension Request. Shannon's Villaee Business Park. Sunset Hwy. and Duvall St. (current 60 day deferral expiring July 24. 1989) Expectation: Applicant requests additional 30 days in which to complete the improvements. Facts: Staff suggested that the applicant would need more than the 30 days to complete the installation of improvements. Ken Nyberg substantiated this opinion, as he had recently visited the site. Motion: Moved by NYBERG, seconded by PARNESS, to grant a 60-day extension, until September 26, 1989, to the existing on/off site improvement deferral. MOTION CARRIED Sewer Improvement Deferral Expires 811/89. Renton Plaza I. 1400 Talbot Rd. (Work unfinished). Facts: Paul Lumbert informed the Board members that the deferral expires August 15th; and, once again, the sewer improvement construction has not commenced. • RESTR ICT IVE C0VEOWQb•Ici2r #0296 D for. RECD F 6.00 SHANNON'S VILLAGE BUSINESS PARMSHSL ****6.00 Sunset Boulevard and Duval Avenue S5 Renton, Washington �1h The Owners , and Developers of Shannon's Village Business Park, do, herein restrict, by Covenant, all additions to, or exterior remodeling of the developed "Site" as shown on Site Plans , , dated May 3 , 1989 subject to approval by the City of Renton of said additions and/or exterior remodeling, based upon a) the existing dense level of development upon the site; b) the proximity of residential development; c) the CI CI existing and anticipated heavy utilization of adjacent O roadways; and, 4) the anticipated limited capacity of sanitary sewers to handle new developments. The "Site" includes that property known as "Shannon's Village" located at Sunset (D • Boulevard and Duval Avenue in Renton, Washington, legally Q described as: CI 00 PARCEL A_ The north 80 feet of Tract 4, Joseph P. Marshall Tracts , according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 38 of Plats , page 30, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed for road by deed recorded under Recording Number 8010270488. PARCEL BL The south 82. 99 feet of the north 162. 99 feet of Joseph P. Marshall Tracts , Tract No., 4, according to the plat thereof recorded in volume 38 of Plats , page 30, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed for road by deed recorded. under Recording Number 8010270488. PARCEL Ci Tract 4, Joseph P. Marshall Tracts , according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 38 of Plats , page 30, in King County Washington; EXCEPT the north 162. 99 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed for road by deed recorded under Recording Number 8010270488. PARCEL Di. li Tract 4-A., Joseph P. Marshall Tracts , according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 38 of Plats , page 30, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion thereof described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the easterly margin of 138th Avenue Southeast as conveyed to the State of Washington for Primary State Highway No. 2 , by deed recorded under Recording Number 7109200153 with a line 135 feet northwesterly of as measured at right angles to the centerline of said Primary State Highway No. 2; thence north 76 26 '00" east parallel with said centerline, a distance of 110. 00 feet to a point hereafter referred to as Point "A" ; thence south 13 34 '00" east, 110. 00 feet to the northerly margin of said Primary State Highway No. 2; thence south 76 26 '00" west, 5. 79 feet to an angle point in said northerly margin; thence south 84 57 '51" west, 101. 12 feet to an angle point in said northerly margin; thence north 25 38 '11" west, 67. 15 feet to an angle point on the easterly margin of said 138th Avenue Southeast; thence north 4 58 '22" east, 30. 94 feet to the point of beginning; AND EXCEPT those portions conveyed for roads by deeds recorded under Recording Numbers 7109200153 and 8010270488. '1)• HIED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST 01 u • OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK C. Kelly O'Nlil, Vi a President • ' RENTON MUNICIPAL BLDG. Lone D .Company, Inc. 200 MILL AVE. SO. '1111)N, WA 98055 , •• • 11 1\1 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING On this / day of tTPMIF 19 87, before me, on, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared C. Kelly O'Neil, to me known to be the President of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and C acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary CD act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes 0/ therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized QD to execute the said instrument. O Q? Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day (A and year in this certificate above written. Notary Public or the S to of Washington Expires / "Z 3-5'3 _ • P., C.- C" C.'") C.)»I N CP rt„ 3j=I •--I CL tirt 1 \ ;$' CITY OF RENTON Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney INA Daniel Kellogg -Mark E. Barber - David M. Dean - Zanetta L. Fontes - Robert L. Sewell, Assistant City Attorneys CIT}'Q;: June 16, 1989 11 Jim 61989 TO: Lenora Blauman, Planning Department `y E , _ P FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney . RE: Restrictive Covenant for Shannon's Village Business Park Dear Lenora: I have reviewed the above-captioned document and the same is approved as to legal form. Lawrence . Warren LJW:as . cc : Mayor A8 .42 : 94 . atel & ix; 1)(17,4;l Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 „ r.<< ;: CITY OF. RENTON `$ fer Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney ammow Daniel Kellogg -Mark E. Barber - David M. Dean - Zanetta L. Fontes - Robert L. Sewell, Assistant City Attorneys . June 16, 1989 /01oUN� 6 1989 ;'J, ' TO: Lenora Blauman, Planning Department 1 1 l t i.1 FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: Restrictive Covenant for Shannon's Village Business Park Dear Lenora: I have reviewed the above-captioned document and the same is approved as to legal form. Lawrence Warren LJW:as . cc : Mayor A8 .42 : 94 . Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 RESTRICTIVE COVENANT for SHANNON 'S VILLAGE BUSINESS PARK Sunset Boulevard and Duval Avenue Renton, Washington The Owners , and Developers of Shannon's Village Business Park, do , herein restrict, by Covenant, all additions to, or exterior remodeling of the developed "Site" as shown on Site Plans , dated May 3 , 1989 subject to approval by the City of Renton of said additions and/or exterior remodeling, based upon a) the existing dense level of development upon the site; b) the proximity of residential development; c) the existing and anticipated heavy utilization of adjacent roadways; and 4) the anticipated limited capacity of sanitary sewers to handle new developments. The "Site" includes that property known as "Shannon's Village" located at Sunset Boulevard and Duval Avenue in Renton, Washington, legally described as: PARCEL The north 80 feet of Tract 4 , Joseph P. Marshall Tracts , according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 38 of Plats , page 30 , in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed for road by deed recorded under Recording Number 8010270488. PARCEiL B_ The south 82. 99 feet of the north 162. 99 feet of Joseph P. Marshall Tracts , Tract No. 4 , according to the plat thereof recorded in volume 38 of Plats , page 30 , in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed for road by deed recorded under Recording Number 8010270488. PARCEL Tract 4 , Joseph P. Marshall Tracts , according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 38 of Plats , page 30 , in King County Washington; EXCEPT the north 162. 99 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed for road by deed recorded under Recording Number 8010270488. PARCEL IL Tract 4-A, Joseph P. Marshall Tracts , according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 38 of Plats , page 30 , in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion thereof described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the easterly margin of 138th Avenue Southeast as conveyed to the State of Washington for Primary State Highway No. 2 , by deed recorded under Recording Number 7109200153 with a line 135 feet northwesterly of as measured at right angles to the centerline of said Primary State Highway No. 2; thence north 76 26 '00" east parallel with said centerline, a distance of 110. 00 feet to a point hereafter referred to as Point "A" ; thence south 13 34 '00" east, 110. 00 feet to the northerly margin of said Primary State Highway No. 2; thence south 76 26 '00" west, 5. 79 feet to an angle point in said northerly margin; thence south 84 57 '51" west, 101. 12 feet to an angle point in said northerly margin; thence north 25 38 ' 11" west, 67. 15 feet to an angle point on the easterly margin of said 138th Avenue Southeast; thence north 4 58 '22" east, 30. 94 feet to the point of beginning; AND EXCEPT those portions conveyed for roads by deeds recorded under Recording Numbers 7109200153 and 8010270488. 7kik; C. Kelly O 'N4il, Vi e President Lone D Company, Inc. • ` I tf • STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING On this / day of ;TM" 1987, before me, on the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared C. Kelly O 'Neil, to me known to be the President of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written. Notary Public or the S to of Washington Expires / !Z 3'q 3 .� CITY OF RENTON a0 Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Daniel Kellogg -Mark E. Barber - David M. Dean - Zanetta L. Fontes - Robert L. Sewell, Assistant City Attorneys 131 Fs' .. 1. fTh June 13, 1989 0'_ JUN 1 4 1989 TO: Lenora Blauman, Planning Department FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE : Restrictive Covenant for Shannon's Village Business Park Dear Lenora: The restrictive covenant, as forwarded to me, is not approved as to legal form. In order to be a restrictive covenant there must be a legal description of the property attached and referenced in the document. I also do not understand what the following words mean, "subject to Site Plan Approval by the City of Renton. " I don't know what they are trying to say, and those words appear superfluous . If I can provide you with any further information please let me know. Lawrence J. Warren LJW:as . cc: Mayor A8 .42 : 92 . Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 RESTRICTIVE• COVENANT for SHANNON'S VILLAGE BUSINESS PARK Sunset Boulevard and Duval Avenue Renton, Washington • The Owners , and Developers of Shannon's Village Business Park, do, herein restrict, by Covenant, all additions to, or exterior remodeling of the developed "Site" as shown on Site Plans , dated May 3 , 1989 subject to "Site Plan Approval" by the City of Renton, based upon a) the existing dense level of development upon the site; b) the proximity of residential development; c) the existing and anticipated heavy utilization of adjacent roadways; and 4) the anticipated limited capacity of sanitary sewers to handle new developments.. Shaun il, President Lone D Company, Inc. STATE OF WASHINGTON CONUTY OF KING On this (-7 day of .vu&_ 19 gQ before me, on the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared Shannon 0/Neil, to me known to be the President of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written. 400e4V74( Notary Public for the 4ate .f Washington . Expires I pc.k I\I \I lq [ -ham Trill I I- _ Ltd * • I `, , tum-� - jU J1_1\ 4,h If am-onVutage ON CORNER OF SUNSET BOULEVARD a DUVALL IN RENTON HIGHLANDS June 5 , 1989 Site Plan Review Committee CITY OF RENTON Renton, Washington Re: Shannon's Village Business Park Sunset Blvd. and Duvall Avenue Dear Sirs; Pursuant to your June 1, 1989 Report (File No ECF; SA- 025-89) regarding the above named project, and requiring as one of the "conditions" for approval, a letter confirming agreement to develop the site in accord with approved plans dated (May 3 , 1989) including: A) Architectural integration of building "A" and "F" into the site plan for the development as-a-whole (including roof-top equipment screening) so as to be thematically compatible with Building "B" and Building "D" ; and B) a "greenhouse" adjacent to building "F" ; and C) on-site outdoor seating; and D) on-site exterior pole lighting, to pedestrian scale, for illumination and safety; and E) on-site pedestrian linkage; and F) on-site signage to protect safety and efficiency of travel. The Owners of the Project respectfully request that you accept this letter as confirmation of their commitment to construct the above named project in conformance with all of the above conditions , and as per approved plans herein stated. Further to same, they have, under separate cover, satisfied the other two (2) conditions named in the report. A LONE "D" COMPANY, INC., DEVELOPMENT 5919 119TH AVE. S.E. BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98006 • 746-5656 I J i If your have further concerns , or require additional information we stand ready to respond promptly. Yours very truly; LONE D COMPANY, INC. (_/-/ 44/11 CAI— C. Kelly O 'Neil, Vice President ---P ' - f INTEROFFICE MEMO TO: C., Anfj c3—\AJZ:r6---- DATE: 6 t T ( CI FROM• - f,,,,,,u ,I5 G------w-0- --- SUBJECT: L-t--rvIA-(Y‘ . U ASIS2 Q.. .( . . _,_,ck_9, , _ka_. ---1,9-- V\-A—&—Q ,-C.i ).3'‘_Z-Icy-\ n._...k-r.....A.L..er-A . a U(9QS.1 P _I----,•\..Ki---0----Aw--../- ,._.9` ,A__ sj-,...3......_e_,.. ....,_ ...._...„....._ sl ) _....--- \ -,\_..t•-lj:.9 \ . . . . ., • . •., • 4•,.1. . • 1 , . . . . . • . .......: . • I.., • . " .. • • • • , . , . . .,. .., • ' . ‘.,T . . • • ., . . .. - , . .., • , •.• - • , , • . . i..k. . , •• . ., ,,y ... . . • . . . . . . , . .,. . . . . . ..•‘,.1. • .• . . • . : ..1'. • • • . , ,•t ., .. , . . .. . •. :1..• : . , . , •;1 - • . • • .. . , . .,..e ''.0 . , • % . . •••••,•?; . . •.'. ,.• •,i :•r ' • . :,1;' •: • •• . • • . : 4: . . ‘ . • : •:'I 4 • . . • ' •iI ••, ..I...'!It .. '. ) • , ...1. . : . ._.• / jOB._;T i�C TEL No . 06-93 —050 Jun 1 , 9 10 :33 No .002 P .01 F A X TRANSMITTAL JOB TRAC' • DATE ‘,/////& REPLY REQUESTED YES NO TO FAX / FROM FAX NUMBER i -� NUMBER (206) 93S—o Q9 NUMBER OF PAGES„ - ( INCLUDING THIS PAGE) TO: 7 / ATE i ION: - COMMENTS' a ��Tr �" •� .,moo THANK YOU TRRC I EL No .2Ub- -U U6 Jun 1 , of 1u •00 iNu .uuiL r . uL i "4. Lenora Bluuman , Planning Dept, eft? Larry Warren , City Attorney City of Renton Planning and zoning Dept., Renton, Washington May 30 , 1989 Re: Shannon 's Village Business Park To whom it may concern; This letter is to i nform those concerned that the owners of the above named project are fully aware of their "at risk" position in starting work on the Building "F4" portion of the project prior to the completion of the appeal period for the revised administrative site plan approval. • We understand that if any appeal is received by the City of Renton it will be necessary for the C:i.ty to order a stop to all Construction ac.:t,i vities on that building until the matter has been resolved. We agree to hold the City of Renton and its employees harrnles for any costs or damages arising from stopping the worh or proceeding prier to • completion of the appeal period. Sincerely,• Lone D Company C. Kelly O 'Neil , President 1r/// SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION JUNE 1, 1989 APPLICATION NO. : ECF; SA-025-89 APPLICANT: William E. Witt LOCATION: N.E. corner of N.E. Sunset Blvd. and Duvall -Ave. N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan approval for a retail and professional office complex consisting of four (4) buildings on a 98, 000 square foot site. Specific revisions now under consideration include: a) addition of a clock tower adjacent to proposed Building "D" ; b) addition of two new drive-through lanes (for a total of three drive- through lanes) to the proposed bank; c) modifications to Building "A" , "B" , "D" and "F" to create greater thematic continuity; and d) exterior on-site improvements (e.g. landscaping, lighting fixtures, pedestrian access) . COMMITTEE REVIEW: The review was conducted at 9 : 00 a.m. on May 25, 1989 , in the third floor conference room of the Renton Municipal Building. The Committee review was conducted after receiving written comment from all divisions of the Public Works Department, all divisions of the Community Development Department, and the Fire, Police, and Parks Departments. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1 Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2 Site plan (received March 15., 1989 ; revised May 3 , 1989) . Exhibit No. 3 Landscape plan (received March 15, 1989 ; revised May 3 , 1989.. Exhibit No. 4 Building elevation plans. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the Site Plan Review Committee now makes and enters the following: Findings: 1. The applicant, William Witt, has requested site plan approval to allow construction modifications to four (4) buildings on this 98, 000 square foot site. Site plans include: a) revisions to the previously approved four (4) buildings to achieve thematic continuity (e.g. pediments, gables, coordination of exterior materials) ; b) revisions to Buildings "A" and "F" , (to provide architectural/design integration of these two structures into the development as /Sith Plan Review Comm , _ .e / Report and Decision June 1, 1989 Page 2 a whole) ; c) revisions to such exterior amenities as lighting, pedestrian linkage and landscaping; d) a clock tower adjacent to Building "D" ; and e) improvements to bank services -- a night deposit window and three drive-through banking service windows (rather than one such drive-through window which had initially been approved) . 2 .' The applicant's file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments. from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3 . Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43 . 21C, 1971 as amended) , a Declaration of Non- Significance-Mitigated was issued for the subject proposal . on May 3 , 1989, with the following condition: a. That the applicant install a luminaire along Duvall Avenue at the northern property line of the site in order to provide lighting to mitigate traffic impacts and ensure safer travel for pedestrians and vehicles, subject to specifications established by the Traffic Engineer. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5. The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Commercial Use established for this site. 6. The site plan as presented, provides sufficient parking to comply with the Parking and Loading Ordinance of the City of Renton. 7 . The subject site was annexed into the City in 1975 by the Adoption of Ordinance No. 2945. The site was zoned B-1, Commercial by Ordinance No. 3403 on March 3 , 1980. 8. Land use on the subject site and on parcels surrounding the subject site is Commercial, including a variety of diverse retail and service uses. 9. The applicant's site plan generally complies with the criteria established by the Site Plan Review Ordinance (4- 738) as follows: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; As noted above, the proposed development is permitted under the Commercial designation for this property on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Similarly, the development conforms with Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies. For example, the proposed development is consistent with Urban Design Goals calling for development to be allowed only where it can be shown to be compatible with future uses in the vicinity (III.A. 1) . It is consistent with Commercial Goals, such as: 1) promoting attractive, convenient, viable systems of commercial facilities (V) ; 2) planned clusters of commercial development should be encouraged to improve access (V.A. 3) ; 3) Commercial areas should be located .SitP Plan Review Commi to Report and Decision June 1, 1989 Page 3 and designed to minimize travel and congestion and to promote safety (V.A. 4) ; 4) sufficient access, circulation, walkways and off-street parking and loading should be provided by commercial developments (V.A. 5) ; 5) commercial areas should be compatible with adjacent land uses (V.A.7) ; 6) various uses within a commercial area should be compatible with each other (V.A. 10) ; 7) joint parking facilities should be encouraged (V.A. 11) ; and 8) individual stores in an area should follow a common design and landscape theme (V.A. 12) . Finally, the proposed development generally conforms to the Northeast Area Commercial Development Objective B. 1. which states that commercial uses developed . . . along Sunset Boulevard N.E. should be oriented within shopping centers or other sizeable complexes. Although not a part of a major shopping center, this development does appear to satisfy this goal which is intended to discourage the development of strip commercial areas. b. Conformance with existing land use regulations: The design modifications as suggested by the proponent and/or as recommended by staff in conjunction with land use/environmental review -- including the architectural incorporation of Buildings "A" and "F" with all of the other structures on the site, the screening of all outdoor (including rooftop) equipment, the improvements to landscaping, to lighting and to pedestrian linkages -- conform to Section 4-711 of the Zoning Ordinance. The proposed clock tower and three drive-through bank service lanes -- the major structural additions to the originally proposed complex -- comply with the B-1 zoning regulations (Section 4-711) with respect to permitted uses, as well as development standards, including lot coverage, height of the proposed structures, and building setbacks. With these proposed design modifications to the previously approved site plan for Shannon's Village, and the proposed additions (clock tower and drive- through windows) , the development will continue to comply with Zoning Ordinance requirements for parking and loading (Section 4-2204) and for landscaping (Section 4-744) . c. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; Potential impacts to the surrounding environment and to neighboring land uses have been identified by staff in the areas of aesthetics, traffic circulation, noise, light and glare, and air quality. 1) Aesthetics The applicant, working with staff, has endeavored to make the proposed commercial development -- both the initially approved retail/service center and the new structures/design modifications presently under consideration (See Finding 1. ) -- one which is compatible in design and scale with surrounding existing commercial and residential developments. Site Plan Review Commit- a Report and Decision June 1, 1989 Page 4 As one example, the proposed clock tower will serve as a focal point and will effectively identify the shopping center. The proposed drive-through lanes will be well-separated from nearby developments and will be screened from those parcels by structures and by landscaping. Additionally, the common design themes, proposed in the revised plans now under consideration -- including architectural integration of Buildings "A" and "F", addition of a greenhouse to Building "F" to the thematic design concept, improved lighting, landscaping and pedestrian access routes -- will provide an attractive view from neighboring properties and for vehicles travelling along adjacent corridors. 2) Traffic Circulation Off-site traffic impacts are evaluated below in Section "F - Safety and Efficiency of Vehicle and Pedestrian Circulation" . 3) Light and Glare This impact is evaluated below in Section "G - Provision of Adequate Light and Air" . 4) Noise/Air Quality These impacts are evaluated below in Section "H - Mitigation of Noise, Odors, and Other Harmful or Unhealthy Conditions" . d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; Potential impacts to the site have been identified by staff with respect to aesthetics, traffic circulation, noise, light and glare, and air quality. 1) Aesthetics The site plan as proposed by the applicant,. and/or as modified by staff, provides an integrated design theme and a pleasant, efficient environment for consumers and employees. Structures throughout the development -- including the four (4) buildings (and the clock tower) and three drive-through service windows -- are to be constructed (or existing structures improved) to have attractive, durable exterior facades. Buildings "A" and "F" will be modified to be integrated with other structures on the site. A greenhouse will be added to Building "F" . Individual units will be linked through pedestrian pathways (raised sidewalks and crosswalks) . The night deposit window will be located and improved so that it is readily visible and well-illuminated to protect user safety. Open areas and landscaping will be designed to improve the appearance of the site and to provide on-site amenities for consumers and employees (e.g. seating areas, view corridors) . 2) Traffic Circulation On-site traffic impacts are evaluated below in Section "F - Safety and Efficiency of Vehicle and Pedestrian Circulation" . !///' Site Plan Review Commit e Report and Decision June 1, 1989 Page 5 3) Light and Glare This impact is evaluated below in Section "G - Provision of Adequate Light and Air" . • 4) Noise/Air Quality These impacts is evaluated below in Section "H - Mitigation of Noise, Odors, and Other Harmful or Unhealthy Conditions" . e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The proposed modifications to this new commercial complex are not expected to have a negative impact on property values in the area since these modifications are designed to: 1) improve the attractiveness and efficiency of the complex; and 2) be compatible with uses on neighboring properties. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; 1) Off-site Based upon ITE Reports, staff anticipates that the three proposed drive-through windows will generate approximately 160 daily vehicle trip ends. Impacts to adjacent rights-of-way (Duvall Avenue and Sunset Boulevard) are anticipated to be addressed by the ingress/egress plan and the on-site flow plan adopted in conjunction with the City's approval of the basic commercial development. That plan was designed to promote safe, efficient flow of traffic to the site via two driveways along Duvall Avenue. Signage/lighting which have been proposed by the applicant and/or recommended by the City (See Finding #2 Environmental Review) are also intended to enhance traffic circulation, thereby reducing the likelihood of queueing to access the site or conflicts between entering and exiting traffic (vehicle-vehicle and/or pedestrian-vehicle) . 2) On-site Applicant proposals and City recommendations for access and circulation routes on the site are also designed to protect pedestrian safety and to enhance vehicle circulation. Proposals/recommendations are made for: a) provision of queueing space for 21 cars in the bank drive-through window access corridors; b) provision of parking and loading areas on-site which are adequate to serve consumers and which are coordinated in a manner which is compatible with on-site circulation routes; c) pedestrian linkage (raised sidewalks, crosswalks) between structures and between the site and adjacent rights-of-way; d) signage and pedestrian-scaled exterior pole lighting to identify/illuminate structures, vehicle travel routes, parking areas, pedestrian pathways, and other on-site amenities (e.g. seating areas) . g. Provision of adequate light and air; The proposed revised development, in combination with Shannon's Village as previously approved, has been designed and sited so that structures are generally well-separated from one another and from neighboring Site Plan Review Commis e Report and Decision June 1, 1989 Page 6 sites to allow good exposure to natural light and to reduce shadow impacts. Exterior pedestrian-scaled pole lighting is planned to supplement natural light so that the site is fully illuminated in order to mitigate aesthetic impacts as well as to protect personal safety and property. Similarly, design and location of structures and open spaces generally protects air circulation on-site (see Section "h" below for further discussion of air quality) . h. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; 1) Construction Construction activity with respect to the entire development -- including the now proposed clock tower and drive-through windows and proposed design revisions (architectural integrity of all structures, improvements to landscaping, illumination and pedestrian linkage) -- will generate some additional dust and debris. Mitigation measures recommended in conjunction with the initial site plan review (1987, SA 031-87) are sufficient to address impacts from these proposed improvements. 2) Operation The proposed modifications to Shannon's Village (e.g. design integration of Buildings "A" and "F" , addition of the greenhouse to Building "F" , improved landscaping, pedestrian linkage, lighting, outdoor seating) are not anticipated to generate noise or to be harmful in any way. - Similarly, the newly proposed clock tower is not anticipated to generate noise, odors or other harmful conditions. It is located well-away from the right-of- way, and, as such, should not distract vehicle operators on adjacent rights-of-way. The drive-through windows will provide a total of 21 queueing spaces for vehicles. If used to capacity, noise impacts from running vehicle engines and air emissions would be likely to occur. Staff do not anticipate that noise from these drive through window queues will be greater than sound produced from vehicles travelling on-site, on adjacent Duvall Avenue or Sunset Boulevard, nor will the Noise Ordinance be violated. The location of structures (other than the bank) away from the drive-through windows should serve to further mitigate sound. Similarly, anticipated air emissions (automobile exhaust, etc. ) is not anticipated to be significantly greater than those emissions occurring from other vehicles traveling on or near the site. PSAPCA does not consider the potential emissions to be sufficiently significant in quantity or quality to require a permit for these drive-through service windows. The proposed night deposit window will be located, constructed and improved in a way which provides the access, light and ready visibility necessary to protect user safety. No other harmful or unhealthy conditions are anticipated. • 410 iepc L JV Y i n 1 $ = Axt$, RI 7 ;r � 3 • F� a J @ u C N, 0 Aa SIi-. A i ►_ A.- A, + k o.3n .4-� H. i I., ie,_ eF t o00 °Ia ". we V rP aT u t ;.7. o 7 . '1 - 'o , mY RkZ! F F F F A Fo tC Fo 20 .. � � 09� Si 0 IP 1 114i•��al° al�ppn44 Q!p ��o.ASD%4>`'1 4' CiSI ci..�D _ .a ddd F ii 4Ei VIP '4 b0-,1- P1 '11I lPig. 1r E9 /i .,9faii)ii \ ;t -==N V� am- _ 1111. , 1 E Yet �ti g 1� dill ;�, S 7w e-emst.a\ �; ; i� Alp 1 I b 511 L10 II i' �o o �:1 1 // �:1114 � A s 0 ' : M I!ro I P al * $ t : • 1[ li Ir M ex'A - 4 M. R Ei q I 0a Fes— I • �•,. ,, _ ', ) :,__ . ,Its ii Ipir-jvik, ,,JEaY ���n: a I Over''•• - ,. ��IPIIIIIII aql bllll1011I fllllllll@f r 1 li��, 1 9 � I1 1 I u 1 s • J r v. .� r' Shannon's Village WILLIAM ARCHITECT Building"B" RAMON,WA vvnrsraaa vnma.""w �mlwim *i/e/G4 Site Plan Review Commis e Report and Decision June 1, 1989 Page 7 i. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and The site is adequately served by existing public services and utilities. Neither the Police Department nor the Fire Prevention Bureau has indicated that the proposed facility would place a major burden on their respective services, if code provisions (e.g. signage) are met. The Police Department has approved the night deposit window. The Utilities Engineer reports that no changes to utilities are necessary as a result of the proposed project modifications. Existing roadways are sufficient to meet increased traffic anticipated to be generated by the drive-through windows. j . Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The proposed facility is expected to have a positive impact on surrounding properties and on the local area as a whole by providing improved service uses which are conveniently located with respect to two major arterials and to nearby residences. Further, the improvement of the existing structures (coordination of exterior materials, screening of equipment) should enhance both the site and the area and possibly act as a catalyst for new development and/or other redevelopment efforts in the area. Conclusions: 1. The subject proposal generally complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2 . Specific issues raised by various City departments and focused on were: a. Aesthetics b. Noise, light and glare. c. Traffic d. Air quality 3 . The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation for Commercial Use. Decision: The revised site plan (May 3, 1989) for Shannon's Village, file no. ECF; SA-025-89, is subject to the following conditions: 1. That a restrictive covenant be placed on the property requiring site plan approval for any addition to or exterior remodeling of the subject site, based upon: a) the existing dense level of development upon the site; b) the proximity of residential development; c) the existing and anticipated heavy utilization of adjacent roadways; and 4) the anticipated limited capacity of sanitary sewers to handle new developments. 2 . That the applicant provide a written statement confirming agreement to develop the site in accord with approved plans (May 3 , 1989) , including: a) architectural integration of Building "A" and "F" into. the site plan for the development as-a-whole (including roof-top equipment screening) so as to be thematically compatible with Building "B" and Building "D" ; b) a Site Plan Review Commit, _-e Report and Decision June 1, 1989 Page 8 greenhouse adjacent to Building "F" ; c) on-site outdoor seating, d) on-site exterior pole lighting, to pedestrian scale, for illumination and safety; e) on- site pedestrian linkage; and f) on-site signage to protect safety and efficiency of travel. 3 . That the applicant provide a landscaping plan which provides for increased size, quantity and diversity of plantings throughout the site, with particular attention to the area immediately to the south of Building "F" . Plantings on the west side of the bank adjacent to the Night Deposit Window will need to be designed so that safety of window users is protected. The plan shall be subject to the approval of the City's Landscape Planner. For the purpose of these decisions, the term "should" and "shall" are to be considered mandatory and the term "may" is considered discretionary. Notes to Applicant: An applicant complying with these provisions and willing to hold the City harmless for any expense or damages incurred for work begun prior to the exhaustion of the 14-day appeal period and/or for work which may consequently be stopped by an appeal or work required to be altered or returned to its preconstruction state, may begin construction activities with the issuance of the proper permits. ORDERED this 1st day of June, 1989 on behalf of the Site Plan Review Committee. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator TRANSMITTED this 1st day of June, 1989 to the parties of record: William E. Witt 219 First Ave. South, #401 Seattle, WA 98104 Shannon O'Neil 5919 119 Ave. S.E. Bellevue, WA 98006 TRANSMITTED this 1st day of June, 1989 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Lynn Guttmann, Public Works Director Ken Nyberg, Community Development Director Larry Springer, Planning Manager Ronald Nelson, Building Director Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Members, Renton Planning Commission Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Valley Daily News REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or before June 15, 1989 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior meeting, may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within 'Site Plan Review Commi e Report and Decision June 1, 1989 Page 9 fourteen (14) days of the decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems proper. If an appeal is made to the Hearing Examiner, requests for reconsideration will be forwarded to that office for consideration at the same time as the appeal. AN .APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 3011 (B) (1) , which requires that -such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 p.m. on June 15, 1989, accompanied by a $75. 00 fee and other specific requirements. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee decision, but to all Request for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. • • • • • • - • ; •- d, c"°°'M 5T7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION �� w It 1011T `•Mt LTM ti A v.ttlnM F1. ���IA,s> 'TM s x ® ram.�i••_ra_�ur�r.r. _-,.t rik u1o1TM3sr .i �.r_...�.. 1 Z Ml A 1 ^ {T I aiM 1.i13TM lT I^ NSUN r .:r...w. rr�r.r N \ SCALE 1'=20' 3 sE = _ _ r:,;T =% • • • VICINITY MAP • _-- — `. '~`•lP .. DUV.4LL =- — _ -- A VENUE N.E • _.� ---- iw !, a•oo s 0517s•. -- Co.M• jii I I ;l /�- __•0 • _ w.wu awV•.wr.�� narT* i w J s w • '' . 1 / . r t . .- • ma Laft•ta.m. . VI r . i •.. , : \ . �i !�1 , • ,,, , ,..._,, ,... ,-, . .. v:.? v , ...... , „. \ I . 11. ii ,. F T -i••• 7/tl lTMl, ���' r •yN ..v ay..' H u•P w , _ • . tT7i ..... f I c ,, ,, ,.BLDG ` I I t I. .� 2Q „ate h a• I f 1 e Y'—'�i� '1 I • LEX. BLDG , •40: ,MAP / in J... . I .— •z..--___4/,_;,,,,./9.77/1,- dOE 1 i . "; • • "I a E1 1 '! i 2n _ ll PAM I � A/ n ! 1 1 -: I I., , _ ` -i-- •� i i I i ,ccn i ,.. ..:, • .. z 71 `1 H--- :I r r 1$ —. BLDG D a..`.. c .._ a..M.. na••..0• • • isAiLX sF t._m a os'• ap / ANA21 ZZ'E �.t• �64(M' J 0 0A., Y .— , ma,a-.aro slat e•nm TTC�i♦ �� —" 14 F-1700 S11 L:rL.fll`/ an _ reds Pt11at Raq irtd-106 �'' xm,acpad walls-. . . • . . . ' . . . • . . . . . • ' . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . • . , . . • . I 4.1.7 ‘,..... . I I I . . . . 3 .. L-/- • . . . i . • . . . . . • I • ! II-- - , • I '''.1 -a:ASO. '- '• ' ' I . MB I I• - - a i LCOVERED WALKWAY•:-M•I . o • \..1 : : Q . -- . . . . . . I. WI ...Es. • . . ... . . . . • M-----Inf---.71E9 morrint • Et!— IM • EE . WI , • PE- . 1M- ra---- JM . -I • . . . . . ._ . . - . . . . . e . . . . . r . . . • . . .: . . . . • . • •. . .. . . . • . . . . . •. . . . . . . • .• • . . . . . • . . .. . . . .• . . - . • • PLAN-RETAIL MALL 410:1 • . . . • . , . , . . , ,...‹...:1:-. .. . ....._...... - . Tlibirri .1' • . ....• . < , < i: : :1 VILLAGE: -.RECUS FOR SIGNAGE•FLUORESCENT BOXES OF CONSISTENT Sin , 4 - r STUCCO•SANE)MUSH /-SlL/T FACE CONCRETE MASONEY-. .-METAL ROOF-SAME COLOR ALL BUILDINGS II r_for..../... ...........,...Ns.... \ / .•. . . \(PROVIDES SOUEN1040.POR 111F-04AN/CAL UNT1S7, ,-] . 11 -„.:11 'I!•' ' , .:• ...,.. _ ..-:•:. IIII• i ii,.•iiiiiii• ::: 71W Ili,: ..;;;,:. 1: -• • 1 •'' .-!: ;. •. 4 'il - '•!!.!• „::;.!:• ::-....,_. ..o--- • •, ,:l ::! .,,-,.—__-•-7:7-•-.::'. Ili.::III ifill111' l'.:' Hll ! Ill''' il''. 1' • . .--- --L. .-F-5-:'.-----.:.i.::. 'iiilli: ;. !!!,' 11! !!. ,:l• . , •;:j1:i::::!: ' _,__,_jta:j=.-..:...... '1.'111111 4 I :•:11h1:),;:t ; 1:I :'. !!1!!!:1!1. ....::=;,-- -::==='" •,• :1:' ...:....-i--3:..ir!::: iiilli•Hill'iH1 I'11 ''I '!' i ''....-7. ...i. `rAr-1-R.u..us pLAN-rER% :. ................... . .. • ••--:-'7.--..,.. ; :. • 0111:ll , hillIll l II l II- .. ... .. k .1 -,; - 1 i ] , I 'WI- • _ , - _ -i-..]- --,., , - . -tr-,-. .,LI. --,, , .. --• ' , , g 1 . =2 WEST ELEVATION RETAIL MALL . . g'2' UT . . ... • . . • 1111111111 -- I •. ` n n. .6). 3) :Si-. ., il I 11 Ir'I _ \ T • -,.n i V 111 A..:--7 .::_-_ 111 1111 1 1 11 I • l L-- J . •. ..tlll lit" G I I ism -uulumnmrInuIO. iii III 4) '� 1 IF:: - . y ,_ f 1 S —n...mulllm— S } _ . c 1 _- 1a a a ,..,,.,Z Z li [� J Vt) - • M. rtiib- 7 s 11K 8 ;8 >e i e • I tttttttttIttttt 1 I—-- r-_. L -: , ❑ = 3_—••^ 1 •jl I.- :'I _ - i 1 in I i JIIi , ,._— I l a • • 1 'I ill' .P !I 11 -1) I 7 \ . - Ill ., = - 'I 1. ❑ = I •H _ :; LI / 1 S Cn r 1 1 _ r I J. Ii1 aIl �., D IMlllllltull - § NM z _ L _2 zFu111111111111P El i) _ �S J. I I It . _ �'d. _ IIIIIIII .% 1 1I DShannon's Village yr 1 CA) Building"B" Rtxiorv,WA. WILLIAM ARCHITECT , li •Alt IbN44 6 • 1.0 if ri Fo000)00oee00o0e0421 ;;0 .0 ;; fill . E qq j g. it il tits ! 1iI18I111jaigi111111 i 111111 - t. 4 Ilii t 1"1 1 I I ? 1 IR DON q 11 Pt ii hi , F i ' € E t ---- ' t 4 f lir tt ---- 1 .. °r /Or "• F l ! F is Fin n f o , -, -- .4 i t ° F t t t O t -1 -- i \' . .;...4r7i.t.0 . ItY 11 -i ir`SI• II - - t '.. f*iel 'd ra r . •I 3 111 Rgq ------ ° 1 HyLte '91i0 .:yti:;1. ii 1 0i•v 'I !i4LL li liPa ;11 ,..t ,./ 1 k... .. : • . . . . . ,.. !? .•.„• ", ___,_ • .. . . . • . .• 0 • . ,, ,,____ _ _ ..i* --,-- _t_ I i . ii . . . ... . .. ., ._ _, . . 0 ... „ . . 1...i.... .„tbitt. 0‘ . . . . \.. ___.,_. _ //F.': .' III?. • ' . . . '"a" -- gg `diA 0 w,4: p.• .::.. .---- _ . , . • rShannon's Village tcn.Llnnl ,.TIT ARCHITECT Building"B" an or..wn. • -Ret+t[rH-u- 1 au•Yv. -NCU(.t' (� Ncuv.�•ua crawtMc.-7C • mu=ARut�iT-i ?�`:'I�� 7IQIII(h i __ _M IIR e.x�os�eE-µvt�mpr+ l I[ . i . 0 1LI L1CLEJ (!;/,' — F1-1 'lxi-PII" "A -P° -T'a r..4.-z pr .r...) — lu-- lu - • IEEE � 11 [l li[[�I ,I, !lull palms - Wfor roc iiorwal, • ��. 1Mj44G 1ue.lV //'••07 ,';‘,• r 4, „Aiii •v ,te,• i•' I3Az:sip& "t[— lrausT $ Iflg4 °` y tl,11-1.cr S.coew • .. _ - t.1.31 "4"—Wry 151,114.6.1.1014 • Lenora Blauman, Planning Dept. Larry Warren, City Attorney City of Renton Planning and zoning Dept. Renton, Washington May 30 , 1989 Re: Shannon's Village Business Park To whom it may concern; • This letter is to inform those concerned that the owners of the above named project are fully aware of their "at risk" position in starting work on the Building "B" portion of the project prior to the completion of the appeal period for the revised administrative site plan approval. We understand that if any appeal is received by the City of Renton it will be necessary for the City to order a stop to all construction activities on that building until the matter has been resolved. We agree to hold the City of Renton and its employees harmless for any costs or damages arising from stopping the work or proceeding prior to completion of the appeal period. Sincerely, Li Lone D Company C. Kelly O 'Neil , President $i ® • CITY OF RENTON ! is i DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION ' fi • • ' s May 25, 1989 „{ ;j • William Witt 219 First Ave. South, #401 Seattle, WA 98104 • RE: Shannon's Village • Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue ECF; SA-025-89 Dear Mr. Witt: - 0 The administrative site plan review process should be completed for the above referenced project and the project report issued on May 30, 1989. A two week appeal period will follow that issuance -- the . appeal period is tentatively scheduled to begin on June 5, 1989 and to end on June 19, 1989. We have advised the Building Division that we are willing to have a building permit issued to you during the appeal period with the following provisos: • 1. That you have met all requirements established by the Building Division for-the issuance of a building permit; • 2. That you provide a letter which states: a) that you understand that if an appeal is filed at any time during the required appeal period all work on-site must immediately cease; and 2) that you will hold the City harmless if it is necessary for you to discontinue operations. This letter is subject to approval by the City Attorney. • If you have questions, or require additional information, please telephone me at 235-2550. Thank you. Sincerely,/12-1/ 6'1,6- 4e4Gt yn—ccct./ • Lenora Blauman • Pi Project Manager LB/mjp • cc: Shannon O'Neil 5919 119 Ave. S.E. Bellevue, WA 98006 • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 • 4 ' 0 CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor MEMORANDUM May 25, 1989 TO: Jim Hanson Building Divisio FROM: Donald Erickso Planning Divisi SUBJECT: Shannon's Village The administrative review process for the revised site plan for new architectural treatment, the addition of a clock tower, three drive-through window lanes, revised landscaping, additional pedestrian lighting, and signing to Shannon's Village will be complete and the report issued on May 30, 1989. The proponent has requested that permission be granted to begin construction of these structures during the appeal period which follows the issuance of the Report. Planning Division staff supports the issuance of an "at risk" permit by the Building Division if the proponent meets all requirements for a building permit as established by the Building Division. In order to obtain the permit the proponent must also provide the City with a letter in which he agrees to stop work immediately if an appeal is filed, and to hold the City harmless if it is necessary to discontinue work. If you have questions, or if this request poses difficulty for you, please let me know. Thank you. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 --4t,METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 May 15, 1989 PLANNINU ,J.''; • 4 CITY OF Hid ION I; MAY 1 6 1989 Environmental Review Committee �,J c/o Donald K. Erickson Zoning Administrator Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Determination of Non-Significance File No: ECF-025-89 WIlliam E. Witt Dear Environmental Review Committee: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to its wastewater facilities or public transportation services. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:wsg4686 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. SHANNON'S VILLAGE ECF; SA-025-89 Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan approval for an office/retail development. The property is located at the northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. NE and Duvall Avenue NE. Any interested party may submit written comments, or may appeal the above determination, within fifteen (15) days of the determination date. Written comments or appeals will be accepted until May 23, 1989. Appeals should be specific and shall set forth the reasons why the particular environmental determination should be reversed. Appeals shall be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055, within the fifteen (15) day comment/appeal period. All appeals must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Planning Division of the Community Development Department, Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055, . Phone: 235-2550. Published: May 8, 1989 . N oT E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-025-89, SA-025-89 APPLICANT SHANNON'S VILLAGE PROPOSED ACTION APPLICANT SEEKS REVISED ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SUNSET BLVD. NE AND DUVALL AVENUE NE. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL Diir WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY MAY 23, 1989 • AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., MAY 23, 1989 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. CERTIFICATION 1 , iTervoi kx), HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THR ) • COPIES OF ' THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN ( 3 PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY1 CONSPICUOUS ON N) AL." PGA Gaa0( • ATTEST: Subscribed end sworn to before me, a ;`: ' Notary Public, n end for the State of Washington • residing in —� ��`• on the `�, � � t' day of N ' 4& SIGNED : �U } ,� , N OT E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-025-89, SA-025-89 APPLICANT SHANNON'S VILLAGE PROPOSED ACTION APPLICANT SEEKS REVISED ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SUNSET BLVD. NE AND DUVALL AVENUE NE. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES Ng DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 1 WILL XWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY MAY 23 , 1989 • AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., MAY 23 , 1989 • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. 0 CITY OF RENTON "LL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION May 4, 1989 William E. Witt 219 First Ave. South, #401 Seattle, WA 98104 Re: "Shannon's Village" Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall Ave. N.E. File Numbers ECF; SA-025-89 Dear Mr. Witt: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above referenced project. The Committee on May 3, 1989 decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant install a luminaire along Duvall Avenue at the northern property line of the site in order to provide lighting to mitigate traffic impacts and ensure safer travel for pedestrians and vehicles, subject to specifications established by the Traffic Engineer. Note: At the time of site plan review, staff will recommend the following, subject to City approval: • a) A restrictive covenant be placed on the property requiring site plan approval for any addition to or exterior remodeling of the subject site, based upon: a) the existing dense level of development upon the site; b) the proximity of residential development; c) the existing and anticipated heavy utilization of adjacent roadways; and d) the anticipated limited capacity of sanitary sewers to handle new developments. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 • William E. Witt Shannon's Village May 4, 1989 Page 2 b) Confirmation that the applicant will develop the site in accord with approved plans for: a) architectural integration of Building "A" and "F" into the site plan for the development as-a-whole (including roof-top equipment screening); b) landscaping the area immediately to the south of Building "F" and the west side of the bank adjacent to the Night Deposit Window; and c) for on-site exterior pole lighting, to pedestrian scale, for illumination and safety; and d) on-site signage to protect safety and efficiency of travel. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The required 14 day appeal period will run concurrently with the comment period. Appeals shall be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055, within the fifteen (15) day comment/appeal period. All appeals must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. The comment/appeal period will end May 23, 1989. Following the end of the comment/appeal period, the City will finalize it's Determination, unless comments received require a reevaluation. In addition, by the end of the comment/appeal period, we should be able to establish a tentative date for completion of administrative site plan review or a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner, should a public hearing be necessary. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235- 2550 and ask for Lenora Blauman or me. For the Environmental Review Committee, m � Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:m jp cc: Shannon O'Neil 5919 119 Ave. S.E. Bellevue, WA 98006 0 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION May 4, 1989 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Re: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of an Environmental Determination issued on May 3, 1989: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED SHANNON'S VILLAGE ECF; SA-025-89 Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan approval for an office/retail development. The property is located at the northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. NE and Duvall Avenue NE. The fifteen (15) day comment period hand the fourteen (14) day appeal period for this project will run concurrently and will end on May 23, 1989. Following the end of the comment/appeal period, the City will;finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. • If you have questions, please call Lenora Blauman or me at 235-2550. c_Sin �v! Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp cc: Mr. Gerald W. Marbett, King County Bldg. & Land Division Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-025-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-025-89 PROPONENT: William E. Witt DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Shannon's Village - Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan approval for an office/retail development. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The property is located at the northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. NE and Duvall Avenue NE. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C. 030 (2) (c) . Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental' Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) . Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from May 3 , 1989. The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period will run concurrent. Any interested party may submit written comments or appeals by 5: 00 p.m. , May 23 , 1989, in order to be considered. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Planning Division Community Development Department 200 .Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: May 8, 1989 DATE OF DECISION: May 3 , 1989 SIGNATURE . . • (//° • e .411. Wr T" N =fig Lynn Gutt ann Commini opme Publ%c Works Director Direct.r DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: SHANNON'S VILLAGE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-025-89 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-025-89 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan approval for an office/retail development. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The property is located at the northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. NE and Duvall Avenue NE. RECOMMENDATIONS: The Environmental Review Committee recommends that a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated be issued with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant install a luminaire along Duvall Avenue at the northern property line of the site in order to provide lighting to mitigate traffic impacts and ensure safer travel for pedestrians and vehicles, subject to specifications established by the Traffic Engineer. Note: At the time of site plan review, staff will recommend the following, subject to City approval: a) A restrictive covenant be placed on the property requiring site plan approval for any addition to or exterior remodeling of the subject site, based upon: a) the existing dense level of development upon the site; b) the proximity of residential development; c) the existing and anticipated heavy utilization of adjacent roadways; and d) the anticipated limited capacity of sanitary sewers to handle new developments. b) Confirmation that the applicant will develop the site in accord with approved plans for: a) architectural integration of Building "A" and "F" into the site plan for the development as-a-whole (including roof-top equipment screening) ; b) landscaping the area immediately to the south of Building "F" and the west side of the bank adjacent to the Night Deposit Window; and c) for on-site • / . /• . \\ // 5 . ,,�\ WILLIAM WITT ARCHITECT ;= AIA ` N. /y City of Renton ,% /•'Building and Zoning Department • • ` RE: Revised Administrative Site Plan Approval for : . SHANNON'S VILLAGE ' / \ Renton,Wa. / / � � . /, ' . \\ Attn: Lenora Blauman , Attached/are two copies of'the Shannon's Village Site /Lan2lcape plan with the,following . • revision's: ' / 1. Parking has been revised at exit of drive up. (If Renton prefers a wider drive,we do not j object to rernoving 1 or 2 additional spaces.) We will;add a"no right turn" sign at'drive up exit:., / • / 2. Mid level shrubs have been removed from front of bank. Low level junipers remain. My ../ / '\ understanding is tliat Seafirst Security have resolved any problems with the Police Dept. on the j', \\ Night deposit location-adjacent to the entry.. ,' , `'`. 3. We ate preparing a site lighting plan for your review. /" / \ Si; ncerely, • 'Zi. ila* \- (.../7". . /' i William Witt - /\\ \ / \ i \ / . /", \\ / •,,/ / / I?LJ1iVIVl��ILI'O�IC DIVISION %'\ ,, . \ / //\ CITY OF RENTON . ' . / ..., \` \ \, . .„ ' ® APR. 2 8 1989 D-, \\ , / , ,,, ,,- • . \.. , /\ ;,\ ',. / \ / / \ // \ / \ \ % �\ 219 FIRST AVE.S. `,/ SUITE NO.210 7. SEATTLE,WA 98104 • s_� (206)682-1180 / \ % \\ \ \ / ,/ \ / \. ' \ . // ; \ \ / S. 1% RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: park.% DATE CIRCULATED.: March 28, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: April 11, 1989 ECF-025-89 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON 1 APPLICATION NO(S) : ( EA-L-0-25-8?) PROPONENT: William E. Witt JUN s��9 PROJECT TITLE: "Shannon's Village" RECEIVED BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan approval for an office/retail development. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall Ave. N.E. SITE AREA 2 .26 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 20, 200-. square feet ` IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1.. Earth o ° ° 2. Air ° o ° 3 . Water. ° o ° O 4 . Plants ° o ° ° 5. Animals ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° o ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° o ° ° 9. Housing ° ° ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° o ° ° 12 . - Recreation ° o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° o ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° o ° ° 15. Public Services ° o ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: 44 rpe0.4r � e4v,r�-in *V d�AV. :fr�ef We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we hav ex tise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where ado n - rmation is needed to properly assess this proposal. e-- 1/41// /fer, Si na ,I e of Dire or or Authorized Representative D� e g P Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 5�. ECF-025-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-025-89 PROPONENT: William E. Witt PROJECT TITLE: "Shannon's Village" BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan approval for an office/retail development. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall Ave. N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: April 19, 1989 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON April 11, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ,%t/ gee-,efe,747-9-4\ APPROVED X APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 4G �.'`� o/' —e crece (_d-h f!,/"e. /7-.- l f/vet ..-e.ott-e..;_ G.'€-h 46e c y c,lC �/� / J/G.- �t ��.rr��ems, lJ S!�C' ,SiUalGc take mof' !�7 DATE /(<9,rp SIGNA'04 ' OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE �" G / REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN • ,6 Oil%d//fj�, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE �' F�T��4' ' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Niue l/ D 9 fp-,DATE CIRCULATED: March 28, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: April 11, 1989 7. ECF-025-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-025-89 PROPONENT: William E. Witt PROJECT TITLE: "Shannon's Village" BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan approval for an office/retail development. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall Ave. N.E. SITE AREA 2 .26 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 20, 200 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° ° 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° • - ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9. Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° 15. Public Services /" ° ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where ,`)additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature & Dir`ector or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 !// RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-025-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-025-89 PROPONENT: William E. Witt PROJECT TITLE: "Shannon's Village" BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan approval for an office/retail development. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall Ave. N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: April 19, 1989 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON April 11, 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED /APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED h,CeDkA 1(.406--ul cask, Wtocoh_LA/Le)-- SCRAMALAr cukiK 2 1 DATE 0� 1 SIGNATURE OF DIRE TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 City of Renton MEMORANDUM April 12, 1989 To ▪ Technical Advisory Committee From : Penny Bryant, Crime Prevention Coordinator, Police Department Re ▪ "SHANNON'S VILLAGE" I have several concerns about the purposed SeaFirst bank branch to be located at Shannon's Village. This memo outlines those concerns. CASH MACHINE/NIGHT DEPOSIT: The bank is situated such that the main entrance is on the west side of the property line, boarding Duvall Road. While this road faces traffic and is conducive to visual observation, it is unsafe for people arriving at this bank to use the bank machine, or night deposit. Customers will have to park their vehicles in the south lot and then walk around the building to use the cash machine. This is a dangerous location for the cash machine and night deposit. LOITERING: The branch is located with several other businesses in such a manner that it allows for loitering, making the bank an easy mark for robbery. Observation of suspiciuos individuals will also be nearly impossible with the location of the bank in a mixed business complex. TRAFFIC FLOW: The design of the drive-up windows and parking availability indicate that the parking lot will have a great deal of through traffic, this is a major cause of traffic accidents in parking lots. With these concerns in mind, I feel this bank has the potential for having a major impact on police services. V ' . - RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 0 C//) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE ' " Fi?- ;�ii REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Agrl inee.Y1rl;i e -4989 DATE CIRCULATED: March 28, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: April 11, 1989v f �S D. ECF-025-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-025-89 PROPONENT: William E. Witt PROJECT TITLE: "Shannon's Village" BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan approval for an office/retail development. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall Ave. N.E. SITE AREA 2 .26 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 20, 200 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth )G o ° ° 2 . Air ° o ° ° 3 . Water ,L ° 4 . Plants ° o ° ° 5. . Animals ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° o ° ° 9 . Housing ° o ° 10. Aesthetics n ° o ° O 11. Light & Glare - ° o ° 12 . Recreation ° o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o ° ° 14 . Transportation ° >r ° 15. Public Services ° ° ° ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas .of probable impact or are where additional ' to mation is needed to properly assess this pro osal. ii7dtr4a 3 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Dat Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-025-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-025-89 PROPONENT: William E. Witt PROJECT TITLE: "Shannon's Village" E.•, BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan approval for an office/retail development. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall Ave. N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: April 19, 1989 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON April 11, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED dArzi.6rg.d .tDATE 4/877 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR .OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE_ REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT �� 15�QP�d DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHE � tip tNION 9 ;< ECF-025-89 ® �pR 2 � �cn f: APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-025-89 ns PROPONENT: William E. Witt PROJECT TITLE: "Shannon's Village" BRIEF DESCRIPTION, OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks revised administrative site �. plan approval for an office/retail development. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall Ave. N.E. TO: " PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: April 19, 1989 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT . BUILDING DIVISION • PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: • COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON April 11, 1989. : REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Traffic Engineering APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ` NOT APPROVED The addition of two drive-up windows for the Bank building instead of one drive-up window will add 160 vehicle trips' per day to the small shopping area. Due to the increase in traffic and the narrowing of Duvall Ave. NE for the northbound traffic near the northerly entrance, one (1) additional street light needs to be added at the north end of the development where the north property line intercepts the back of the sidewalk. Phase I of this development requires conduit to be available for a street light at this point. The additional street light is needed for the safetyof the travelling public and pedestrians walking in the area. The added luminaire is to be drawn onto the Phase I street light plan. DATEv,-/ /i )� SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR A HORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET is REVIEWING DEPARTMENT;/ , G DATE CIRCULATED: March 28, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: April 11, 1989 ECF-025-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-025-89 Cr PROPONENT: William E. Witt PROJECT TITLE: "Shannon's Village" BRIEF DESCRIPTIoN OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan approval for an office/retail development. - LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall Ave. N.E. SITE AREA 2 .26 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 20, 200 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION t; IMPACT] IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° / ° ° O e e 2 . Air e % 0 ° e e ° 3 . Water . e ° e ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° O O O 5. Animals ° ��-� ° e O / e e ' 6. Energy & Natural Resources • t/ ° O O O 7 . Environmental Health ° e e e 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 Gam'- ° 0 e e 0 9 . Housing a l/r e e e ° e 10. Aesthetics ° �' O e e ° e 11. Light & Glare ° v--'' e e e e ° 12 . Recreation ° e✓ e e 0 . 0 I • 13 . Historic &Cultural Preservation b ° e O e 14 . Transportation 0 / e ° e ° 15. Public Services ° v''' e e e e e 16. Utilities a /-`"� e e COMMENTS: The addition of two drive-up windows for the Bank building instead of one drive-up window will add 160 vehicle trips per day to the small shopping area. Due to the increase in traffic and the narrowing of Duvall Ave . NE for the northbound traffic near the northerly entrance, one (1) additional street light needs to be added at the north end of the development where the north property line intercepts the back of the sidewalk . Phase I of this development requires conduit to be available for a street light at this point. The additional' ' street light is needed for the safety of the travelling public and pedestrians walking in the We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ,k_s.,ed / /„... 2_, ,...- //12,v_i 1 ly ) 1 .e'9 . Signature of Direct° or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 i( area. The added luminaire is to be drawn onto the Phase I street light plan. ° 1 / / 'Si RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DL__:RTME �,,� f'``'';; ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW , i 2 S �1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Eyre, 1ev1}1ry �e/ �p7y8`9 ` U , n DATE CIRCULATED: March 28, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: April ,�, 19894 r e ECF-025-89 486a %/ ino4. APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-025-89 PROPONENT: William E. Witt PROJECT TITLE: "Shannon's Village" BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan approval for an office/retail development. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall Ave. N.E. SITE AREA 2 .26 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 20, 200 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth o o ° ° 2 . Air 0 ° ° ° ° 3 . Water ° ° o °` 0 4 . Plants ° ° 5. Animals ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° ° 9. Housing ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12. Recreation ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14. Transportation ° ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° 16. Utilities 0 ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ______1464Z---- o." .74 /,./9 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative . Dte Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DErcinTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-025-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-025-89 PROPONENT: William E. Witt PROJECT TITLE: "Shannon's Village" BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan approval for an office/retail development. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall Ave. N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: April 19, 1989 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION x FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION . _ SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON April 11, 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISIO APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A second means of approved access is required. Fire Department access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes --No Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of .4i` o-oa required. Al hydrants with a minimum flow of oa-o is is required. gpm each Primary hydrant is required to be within Secondary hydrants are required to be within 3 o Q .feet of the feet o str ucture. structure. f the An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes No All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes! No All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes! No DATE ` 7o-a j . /9'9 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 /-2e-AZ--/-V/A//Viy Ai P' REQUIRII) FIRE FLOI•! CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION I: NAME -s7447,vvaA/ s 1,//AX /4f U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS _S-CW A Y 6/1/D _27C/4404I AWE. NF FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - II IV III FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WOOD MIXED I (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: �/C MA4< GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 (A l___D M_ .. NUMBER OF STORIES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: g /'l/ 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA (A): ,)5 0 O GPM (B. 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: GPM (C. IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD0 ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): (IF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) 7) S C) O GPM (D: 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: GPM (E: (IF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF (D). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION max. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH /S'U' -1- ADD CD % 11 - 30 20% MAX. EAST /O' ADD 7_,S % 31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH • /a' ADD RO % 61 -100 10% MAX. WEST Z,Z' ADD to % 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : 5 S sg (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) ADJ+.MTMENT: I rl5w GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: (IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: GPM' (G) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) r,7 (IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,0.10 GPM) 3,d S (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: I// 01,1) GPM (H) 11. SIGNED: / % ("4 - I ATE 7cFAC1L ,r ' /9 0 9 city G;`'-,e RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4,0 oi<`4.<`; %,.,, , ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET (� , w.-.,,, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Th 1 j lie. /fr `989 ,: ,,, DATE CIRCULATED: March 28, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: April 11, 1989 v D ECF-025-89 r'. APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-025-89 PROPONENT: William E. Witt PROJECT TITLE: "Shannon's Village" BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan approval for an office/retail development. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall Ave. N.E. SITE AREA 2 . 26 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 20, 200 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 ° O ° 0 2 . Air ° ° ° ° 3 . Water ° ° 0 o ° ° 4 . Plants 0 0 ° o ° ° 5. Animals 0 ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° o ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° O ° ° 9 . Housing ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation ° o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o ° ° 14 . Transportation ° o ° ° 15. Public Services ° o ° ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have/ex er ise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional f rmation is needed to properly assess this proposal. / ;7 A? Signature o Director or Authorized Representative Da e Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET !`i'. ECF-025-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-025-89 PROPONENT: William E. Witt !' PROJECT TITLE: "Shannon's Village" BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan approval for an office/retail development. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall Ave. N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: April 19, 1989 hr ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE-PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON April 11, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: (J//L/T/.ES 4-7Al6--/it/E,�,e/tv' APPROVED -%APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED gr° ;\111° �n DATE L6/ 7 /�/ SIGNATURE" OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 V ,,-. 4'''' 4 ' RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTME 9'Q ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ! 0/fj�1y89 REVIEWING . DEPARTMENT: 5-6ro\ We{� l/ /� e4( , ' DATE CIRCULATED: March 28, 1989. COMMENTS DUE: April 11, 1989 ECF-025-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-025-89. PROPONENT: William E. Witt . . PROJECT TITLE: "Shannon's Village" • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan approval for an office/retail development. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall Ave. N.E. SITE AREA 2. 26 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 20,200 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ' ° ° ° 2 . Air ° • • ° ° ° 3 . Water ° ° o 0 ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° ° t 5. Animals 0 ° o ° O 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° ° ° O ° 9. Housing ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14. Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° ° o O ° 16. Utilities ° ° COMMENTS: mo, objecV°s1 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ' 3&//), Signature of Dir tor or Au orized Representative Dat Rev. 6/88 ri . . - RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-025-89 is APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-025-89 PROPONENT: William E. Witt is PROJECT TITLE: "Shannon's Village" BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks revised administrative site i plan approval for an office/retail development. .. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall Ave. N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: April 19, 1989 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT Y,. OTHERS: 51kIrm COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON April 11, 1989. REVIE NG DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Z DATE 3��� SIGN TURE OF DI ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 p�'4/4 ® %oyet, RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4po, *et, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET- ( x 41 �� g89 ` REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'U,1,i Ic1 v!q (a , ,:: DATE CIRCULATED: March 28, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: April 11, 1989 � ECF-025-89 APPLICATION. NO(S) : SA-025-89 PROPONENT: William E. Witt PROJECT TITLE: "Shannon's Village" BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan approval for an office/retail development. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall Ave. N.E. SITE AREA 2 .26 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 20,200 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° o ° ° 2 . Air ° o ° ° 3 . Water 0 ° - o ° 4 . Plants ° o ° ° 5. Animals ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources 7 . Environmental Health ° o ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° o O ° 9 . Housing DC ° ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° 12 . Recreation ° o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o ° ° 14 . Transportation ° o ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° 0 o ° ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: We haver 'ewed this application with particular attention to those areas which e h ve expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where add tional inf r ation is needed to properly assess this proposal.`}N/y //C/ 2 J S ' --'-ture of Direc or or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 V RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-025-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-025-89 PROPONENT: William E. Witt PROJECT TITLE: "Shannon's Village" BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan approval for an office/retail development. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall Ave. N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: April 19, 1989 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON April 11, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: C� APPROVED `� APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED c-rb n f6 We-t1c,D Q e C4_ a.v , DATE Y''-3 D 4 SIGNATU DIRECTOR OR AUTHO IZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 4 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: c 1n ! PEu tIKs DATE CIRCULATED: March 28, 1989 1 COMMENTS DUE: April 11, 1989 ECF-025-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-025-89 PROPONENT: William E. Witt PROJECT TITLE: "Shannon's Village" BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan appro al for an office/retail development. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall Ave. N.E. SITE AREA 2 . 26 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 20,200 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 9 . Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° 11. Light & Glare 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: tXIME®R L1614"1 i 'WW1 PROM1566 110i1H/& vie mairt044 Goy. (Xi siotart, reRHAys 7115 U1 b 66 )e& il?cv3 i tit iMittec, • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. re: ,516 -bc1 Signature of Efj ector or Authorized Representative Dat �� Rev. 6/88 4 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-025-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-025-89 PROPONENT: William E. Witt f' PROJECT TITLE: "Shannon's Village" BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan approval for an office/retail development. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall Ave. N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: April 19, 1989 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION . SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON April 11, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: rj44 11411 PO APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Mom►o DATE „3'�.. - sof SIGNATURE OF DIREC R OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 / (440 r4 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ® MqR ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE , e 2 91,89 el REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: La�q /1 1 �3N1�1� ,. DATE CIRCULATED: March 28, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: April 11, 1989 ECF-025-89 ( ) APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-025-89 iiiillmaitti- PROPONENT: William E. Witt 696T 8 Z ?IVW (0 PROJECT TITLE: "Shannon's Village" NO1NN JO h1.10 NOISVO rmi\u.iyi o! BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks revised administrative site • plan approval for an office/retail development. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall Ave. N.E. SITE AREA 2.26 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 20,200 ,square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth o 0 ° 2 . Air ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° o ° ° 4. Plants ° O 0 0 5. Animals ° ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources 0 ° ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° O ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° 0 o ° ° 9.. Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° o 0 0 11. Light & Glare ° o ° ° 12. Recreation ° o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o ° °' 14 . Transportation ° ° 0 o ° ° 15. Public Services ° o ° ° 16. Utilities ° ° COMMENTS: 27e) L .es.-..4.) We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are wher addition 1 'nforma ' n is needed to properly assess this proposal. 3-a7 Signature of Directo or Authorized Representative Date Weir. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET PLANNINIHJM SfOfV ECF-025-89 CITY OF RENTON r _ APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-025-89 D MAR 2 8 i989 PROPONENT: William E. Witt ECEOUE PROJECT TITLE: "Shannon's Village" BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan approval for an office/retail development. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall Ave. N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: April 19, 1989 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU is POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE X LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON April 11, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED X APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED a-=4 DATE d SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/ 8 $1 ,ek CITY OF RENTON =� POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT -- 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 yyt Oy�� f!, Kingsley G&M Parker 925 Kirkland Ave NE Renton, WA 98055 Pyi • 6961/ cn ilJ LA• ; L' YU CJ : 1Q 9 HdY !LINABLE TO FORWARD 1,REs URN TO WRITER ( ° ) .:,,s,„ . „,,,,.. bgE -`•� '� OF PENDING , ;:,: .,;:.- !, ....;.,, � SITE PLAN APPLICATiON . r..,i 0 '1 DESCRIPTION : SA-OZ .: .: ` "SHANNON'S VILLAGE" APPLICANT SEEKS REVISED ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR-AN ;j. , `° OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT. :,A x. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: NORTHEAST CORNER OF SUNSET BLVD. NE AND DUVALL AVE. NE . • / PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED . o ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW o SITE PLAN APPROVAL o BUILDING PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED } BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS -, AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED t,,= . A WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION , I , ne,h ,, C,1 ,30 , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT • I � (3) COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 11-M (3 ) CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON ti PIK Oh Si ! Ig8q • ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington � Vy�L.(� residing in ,itrra6J� , on the SIGNED : 11 day of�98 / 40‘.4„ ( e,a k r NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL 1, RENTON, WASHINGTON t A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. r 1 DESCRIPTION: SHANNON'S VILLAGE , ECF; SA-025-89 Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan approval for an office/retail development. • GENERAL LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. NE and Duvall Ave. NE PUBLIC APPROVALS: o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2550. lA I?2I'4 ~ 76) Tao a ,. :;:'.f. ------: I1 •,_ rj�+� i�rl _,;.. 3 IJ toy • 1. ilt:rl :I• lg g oo�1 L 1 J l d • �o • • r'�.1:1.h: ;�'j r, :':•1G DEPT. T I • 1• H 1 . !, td 1 I I . i . 2 \ . ,Ipt-&:-Ars„, s3 3 t-1 • t.1.���7 "4.c,. to .../ / / / / '/ 1 •�SIM '.9 �(51 Z5 17 le' '! . ! --_.. {I p 115 t t i t to r9, .V,:.7 ,, f`�.j" , t :l 1 ` `` 1 .. lil • V lti el, 1G mg 51 1 .) 2/1 1 • / \ . • 1 kr, r - -6,417 . s-c 1 . . . , ,,( ),.1 .,00s, N3 i . i . .t ,, .1, , ,c. ,, I , . N' • • J • 1 :111111111 i t I , WHAZEN SR t1111-3 ZHIGH' SCHOOL 4.5 4 7 ''®'!' . ' • L._ • / 11L" Si / �' 111E 11.10:u : D• — . , . 3 \�0 17 11:: 7e: Q "11 'r. • yI i� 11 SI l: �1:?.•. Imo%I W • • - . . I ... :_ t L 1,. OF RED . A • c3Tic �� 0 "� O,flgr�O SEP, „,. OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION - DES CRIPTION : "SHANNON'S VILLAGE" APPLICANT SEEKS REVISED ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL LOCATION AND/O.R ADDRESS: NORTHEAST CORNER OF SUNSET BLVD. NE AND DUVALL AVE. NE PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED .: o ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW o SITE PLAN APPROVAL o BUILDING PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS .WILL BE RECEIVED • BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON . BUILDING .& ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL t. RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: SHANNON'S VILLAGE S ECF; SA-025-89 Applicant seeks revised administrative site plan approval for an office/retail development. GENERAL LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. NE and Duvall Ave. NE PUBLIC APPROVALS: o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2550. t6II , II ts, t.o :1,. 1 I 1 . r nR ('"1 1 )I �l I� Q 203 • ' I�11,' 1�1., rI :1. ) .O Ta SST-'�: 81 '0 II '41 II • • f"1'j['".:ri! r}''(:dG DEPT. t i• 1- 9 In ---- - t!1 I1 1 2 r� ' ® — .---- 3-I. —. 012 ��„ tip 53 ,. l r �VD277/ �4 s 1p ,tiQ�®�� 3� / ./' I Sire '•si ottr®®� / /' ` -'/ -/.../ -�_- . ,,., ,j,‘ ,ibity . ,.: ,1 �� 1112It14IL I, I �i11 �!.I . / Q —r- . �JD ,, ,,•., . . • . . . , • Nz .. . i. 1 , \ ,1% 2 ' • • rr . k'':-)2j 'Illi' • W HAZEN SR T-- HIGH SCHOOL �2 �3 4.s 6 . 7 8! / 11.w 51 ' )1-- It 11.10.11 .I1• to . • iB t � I� . Q "II � . CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION March 28, 1989 William E. Witt 219 First Ave. South, #401 Seattle, WA 98104 Re: "Shannon's Village" Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall Ave. N.E. • File Numbers ECF; SA-025-89 Dear Mr. Witt: The Community Development Department has formally accepted the above referenced application. It has been routed for departmental review and is tentatively scheduled for review by the Technical Advisory Committee on April 19, 1989. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of this project, please contact Lenora Blauman of our office at 235-2550. �riricer� . J Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/MBS:mjp cc: Shannon O'Neil 5919 119 Ave. S.E. Bellevue, WA 98006 • • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 -71 r/".1.-:-.:?:c-i' �'' o .1TY OFI� E. T FILE NO(S): s� "�-5 -� + f; BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT E�.1�'0?-S 8" .,u �� = off � . N� mAsTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) . • APPLICANT I I TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME �L.U,k..r1 W. li.LV FEES ADDRESS 0 REZONE*(FROM TO g-VA 1ST. �Jlr_ S. 0 SPECIAL PERMIT* ��) • CITY �0( ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* • IIOI L US E U l T�(17btl� - l f,ci • TELEPHONE • SITE PLAN APPROVAL 1:=3 SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL . No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON .0 . V ARIANCE* From Section: NAME • * Justification Required WILL ..1 �, t \TV- • ` ADDRESS ' SUBDIVISIONS; Z1, ` 1 4T0> - '�t:› ( 0 SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP 0 TENTATIVE PLAT • r'll'.:e_ 141 . CP534.e%Wf 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE C:--1 FINAL PLAT 6,62__ I VgCD Q WAIVER p (Justification'Required) Y Y O N E Il NO. OF LOTS: ' NAME PLAT NAME: Gail-aQi- O :i-) --1 L . 1 ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 5.119 1 t cu 0 PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP 0 FINAL • 'VSLj. 4L)te.4 %4 b.. `t&Oc TELEPHONE Shittaltiosi401 P.U.D. NAME; . ZZ - l2 1s '746 • rgg 0 Residential 0 Industrial UCommercial a Mixed LOCATION r MOBILE (HOME PARKS: i PROPERLY ADDRESS • TENTATIVE . 13E-co(L L rr� So►.-S --L 4200Ac 1— EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: ' C9 _ . d IZ.1'c/6.11am- NUMBER OF SPACES: • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE qO Cj� . SQ. FT. ACRES �� AREA: l��1 S 2 2� WWI. ✓I (X s. - TOTAL FEES 9 ! / CRY itama I& AFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING ' DATE STAMP OF RENT-ON APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: , J D , MAR Z 3 1989 APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: T p�- n0 Accepted �j r' I� 1:=1 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: • (Initials) • DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 0 Accepted 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On • By: ROUTED TO: (Initials) 0 Building 0 Design Eng. 0 Fire 0 Parks 0 Police 0 Policy Dev. 0 Traffic Eng. • 0 Utilities ' • • • • • Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). . fifl/'CH 63, • AFFIDAVIT Wtt-LU *-4 - WATT , being- duly sworn, declare that I• am S4 authorized representative to act for the property owner, (`]owner of the property Involved in this application and that. the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the Information herewith submitted are In all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. • SUBSCRIBED. AND SWO N TO BEFORE ME THIS PLANNING DIVISION DAY . OF • CITY OF RENTON • of •9 7. D MAR 1 3 1989 —� . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING re-i. AT l5 luJ LS �lJ L� (Name o tary Pu ) (Signature of ) WPa1 , V E • 2_2. ..la;e/(LaC_Gee-s v -1-4se.-t) _: 6 d*.ttc. . (Address) ' AA_ (Address) • _ te111. , 14�+•- c0� (City) (State) (Zip) j 4:62:= l(80. (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed In the "Application Procedure." 1 WILLIAIVI WITT ARCHITECT AIA ■ ■ ■ v •UeTh City of Renton .' MA Building and Zoning Department 1989 /0 Revised Administrative Site Plan Approval for: SHANNON'S VILLAGE Renton,Wa. 3-10-89 We have been required to submit an application for a revised Site Plan Approval including a new environmental checklist for the Shannon's Village project. The current status of the project is as follows: Building "A" is complete and occupied(except upper level)by dental offices. Building "D" Retail Mall (Buildings C, D, E on original plan)Currently under construction. Building "B" Permit application submitted 12-88; comments received 2-89 indicated"major change of building "B"into a bank with drive through windows will require an ammended Administrative Site Plan approval. (Ref SA-031-87)( i) The changes to the project since the original site plan approval have been minimal. The buildings are of the same general size, configuration , and materials. The changes are outlined here: 1. Building "B", now with Seafirst Bank as main floor tenant will have 3 drive up lanes instead of the one on the initial approval. We are providing 7 backup spaces per lane instead of ' the 5 required in the zoning code. The driveup is hidden from the street view, and if there should be overflow beyond the backup provided it would be on site rather than causing congestion on Sunset or Duvall. 2. We have added a clock tower as a focal point to the site and to help unite the buildings. It is in front of the retail mall which acts as a backdrop to the site, and centers approx. between buildings "A" and "B". This clock tower,with planter, trellis, and benches, and the stair towers • of"A" and "B" facing each other should unite and enhance the project. 3. The architectural detailing of the buildings has been,we feel, enhanced,since the original approval. The materials are the same - Split face masonry, cedar siding, metal roofing and trim, with the exception of the retail mall where stucco will be used in lieu of wood siding for the wall areas other than the masonry. (This was to respond to comments from the fire Marshall's office.) Some colors will be the same on all buildings, the blue metal roofing for example, but there will be some differences between the buildings as well. 219 FIRST AVE.S. • SUITE NO.210 SEATTLE,WA 98104 (206)682-1180 • • We have been requested to submit a revised environmental checklist as well. The few changes .to the origin,* are indicated. . Sincerely, j(a4Q(4A William E.Witt, AIA MI azi :;) . t:1 : • r.._.: �.:. in: ••: •.• tot gnarl la 240 zoo • • II t ' �1:I ,1, } r E. 2.0L ST 202'g !$I), II, !' I! J. r: i.! .7:r,/ !:-Nr, DEPT�, o t a 201 • 19 TM T lb • • 1 I �r�� am v 37 .. r h Z • V4Z74.14114r 36. • 91 Ihtl/IP ` 4 3t 143 �`, 1i .1;,.1 r /YD277a vity4:10 iir (itip 3I • — • ly"; • . C './. =2)0 �.4,;�i'�� , :, / , ff / / l • 7 • ..,41d . ... ——�'\ s 1 III ;)'' • Sig` • `J 10 II It II 14 16 14 1'1 1 5 j. > :.;.f ,• it. . ' \•• • GN r - .131-v17 . .. ),,, . eput-leps-c . 1.11 , . .: .. , . N....c..s, • •t . . . . , ( \ ; . •• • , „ . • . ..., . .. ..: .,. . . • • t,,, . • • �� J • • • • y4i.. . s . .-a . nnillIMIMIP IMAM.IIIM 16.111:f 1.6 1.. Lic IMAM wife 1110.1.40 71 .... z ,;; HAZEN SR . . . , . ��llZ• -� HIGH SCHOOL .. ' . . l 1 i 113 4 ,s e . 7 e`.:� . ; 1 1ITW ST / �, : )1.: ti ��20 25 '11.; 'i:f , • Z 111 11 24 > ;ii • �r',,. 11I1��)I�)1 l� �' �� .I� • L'A L . V& 'GK/f' 1. /CAN The land' referred to in this •comitment is. situated in the.: county of ' • King,• • state of .Washington, and *described as follows: . ' PARCEL A: . ' • The north 80 feet of Tract 4, Joseph P. Marsliall..Tracts, according to the plat thereof recorded in 'Volume 38 of flats, page 30, in King County, Washington; . EXCEPT that portion thereof .conveyed for .road by deed recorded•.under Recording Number 8010270488. • . . PARCEL B: : . The south 82 . 99 feet of 'the nor01. 162 ,99 feet of Joseph. P. Marshall .Tracts, Tract No. 4, according to the plat. thereof, recorded in. - Volume 38 of Plats, page 30,. in King County, Washington;- EXCEPT that portion thereof; conveyed -for. road by ,deed recorded under Recording Number 8010270488. , . . - . . : . PARCEL' C: .. Tract 4:, Joseph P. Marshall. Tracts, *according to the plat ;thereof recorded in Volume 38 of Plats, page 30, ini.King County, Washington; EXCEPT the north 162.99 feet thereof; ' AND EXCEPT that portion thereof' con0eyed for road by deed recorded • Under Recording Number 8010270488. • PARCEL .D: •• • Tract 4-A, Joseph P. Marshall Tracts, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 38• of Plats, page 30, in King County, Washington: EXCEPT that portion thereof described as follows: ' • Beginning . at the intersection of the easterly margin of 138th'Avenu Southeast as conveyed to the State of Washington for Primary State Highway No. 2, by deed recorded under Recording Number 7109200153 with a line 135 feet northwesterly of as measured at 'right' angles. :o. _ the centerline of said Primary State Highway No', 2;. thence north 76°26' 00" east parallel with said centerline, a distance of 110.00 feet to a point hereafter referred to as Point "A"; thence south 13°34'00" east, .110.00 feet', to the northerly margin of said Primary .State Highway No. 2; . '• , • . thence south 76°.26' 00"' west, 5.. 79 ' feet to an angle point in said northerly margin; • . thence south 84°57 ' 51". west, 101. 12 feet to an angle point in said northerly margin; thence north 25°38' 11" west, 67. 15 feet to an angle point on the • ' • easterly margin of 'said' 138th Avenue .Southeast'; . .:=i. • • thence north 4°58' 22" east, 30.94 feet to the point of beginning; 'j; AND EXCEPT. those portions conveyed for.. roads by deeds recorded und � ' Re'cording .Numbers :7109200153 and 8010270488 , •( • I SHANNON'S VILLAGE • RENTON, WASHINGTON •• PROJECT PLAN GENERAL• DESCRIPTION • Shannon 's Plaza is a commercial , retail and professional services complex. It is located midway between Renton and Bellevue in a rapidly growing upper middle class bedroom community. The project consists of four separate buildings arranged on a well-landscaped site with excellent street access, visibility, and parking. It is designed to accommodate a variety of community businesses such as medical/dental clinic, beauty shop, flower shop, dry cleaning, real estate office and pet store. Three of the buildings are to be newly constructed with contemporary architectural appearance. One of the buildings is to be remodeled from its current use as a dental clinic to meet the new flower and gift shop tenant's image. The buildings are masonry with cedar timber trim. • The primary marketing area supporting this development has experienced a population increase of over 84% in the past ten years, and an increase of over 64% is expected in the next ten years. The project site is a 98,000 s.f. flat, cleared parcel on the corner of Sunset Blvd. and Duvall Avenue -- the two busiest business oriented arterials linking the community to Bellevue and Renton. The project is scheduled for phased construction. This loan application is to cover the cost of all site development and improvements ; the construction of the first two buildings, A 8 B, and the remodeling of the existing Building F. Phase 2 will complete the last buildings when they have been substantially pre-leased. • • CUfLD:NG/ZOn11NIG DEPT. • nArr 1 tr nr'rngnrn innr • . A. Background A. 11. The proposed project consist of four buildings for retail and professional offices to be known as Shannon's Village. Shannon Village will be located on 2.26 acres within the City of Renton. This development will contain 20.200 square feet of office and retail store. Off street parking will be provided at 1 parking space for every 200 square feet of usable space. Shannon's Village will be served by the City of Renton sewer and water system. An on—site storm drainage system will be provided. Access to the Site will be via Duvall Ave. NE and NE Sunset Highway. A.12. The 2.26 Acre Site is located east of Duvall Ave. NE and north of NE Sunset Blvd. B. Air 2.a. Construction activities will cause a temporary increase in suspended particulates. 1979 date for suspended particulates from Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency indicates the annual geometric means for monitoring stations near the Site (SE District Health Center, Renton WA. ) were 43 micrograms per cubic Meter. This figure is below State and Regional Standards of 60 ug/m. 2.c. During construction, suspended particulate levels may be reduced by the watering and hydroseeding of exposed soils. The increase of CO emission. 3. Water b. Ground b. l. Approximately 72 percent of the (2.26 acres) site will be converted to impermeable surfaces (roofs, parking, driveways, sidewalks) will reduce the amount of exposed soils and natural vegetation. This will reduce the amount of water discharged into the ground. c. Water Runoff c.l. The increase of impervious surfaces will result in increase of surface water runoffs. The developer will comply with City of Renton Storm and Drainage ordinances which require that storm water runoff generated after construction, do not exceed the peak rate of runoff prior to development. Storm water runoff will be collected into underground storage facilities and released into it's natural outlets at a rate equal to peak rate of predeveloped condition. c.2. As is common each development, surface quality will be reduced as urban pollutants (oil, grease, lawn fertilizer) enter surface and ground water more frequently after development. c.3. To alleviate the impact of increasing storm water flows, a permanent detention facilities will be constructed to control runoffs from the Site. Oil/grease separators will be installed to reduce the amount of pollutions j,scharging into ground and downstream area. Temporary erosion/sedimentation controls will be employed during construction to intercept all potential silt laden runoff prior to discharging into stream areas. 4. Plants 4.b. Majority of the Site is bare ground and short grass except for the northeast portion there exist evergreen fir trees and certain underground cover and shrubs. Construction activities will disturb most of the project area and inevitably result in the removal of the trees and natural vegetation. 4.d. The entire Site will be generously landscaped. Plants material include large caliper maple, large caliper evergreen groundcover, and sod lawn. Native groundcover and shrubs are emphasized in the landscape plan. 5. Animals 5.d. The development of this Site may result in some habitat and displacement of some animals. As the Site is landscaped certain bird species may utilize the Site. 14. Transportation 14.f. ITE Technical Committee project 30 to 35 Average Vehicle trips per day (VDT) per 1000 Gross square Feet of lease Area (G.S.F. ) for shopping Centers under 50.000 G.S.F. The area to be leased when the entire project is completed is 21 ,800 (G.S.F. ). The peak hours for such development will occur between 7-9 Am and 4-6 PM, during the weekdays and all day during Saturdays. Week Day - AM 29.6 X 21.8 = 645 VTD PM 31.0 X 21.8 = 676 VTD Weak End - AM 37.7 X 21.8 = 833 VTD (Saturday) • • • 15. Public Services 15.a. Fire Protection The proposed project will be served by the City of Renton Fire Department. First response to a call from the Site would be from station #12. Station #12 is equipped by Medic One Facilities. Police Protection Police services will be provided by the Renton Police Department and will be dispatched by the Valley Com. 16. Utilities Power & Telephone are available to the Site from adjacent roads serving the Site. Puget Sound Power and Light Company will provide services to the Site. Telephone service to the project Site would be provided by Pacific Northwest Bell. A water system will be provided by the developer for the ` Site. The system will be built according to the City of Renton Public Works Department specifications. Public Works will be responsible for the review and approval of final water system design. Gravity sewer service exists on the Site. The system will be extended to serve the entire property. Public Works will be responsible for the review and approval of final sewer plans. A storm water drainage system, including detention facilities, will be constructed as required by City of Renton. Detention facilities will be in the form of oversize pipes. Storage provided will be for a 10 year design storm, and the release rate will be restricted to that of a 10-year storm. • • 1 . r ' +-A + -•.. y,;��r oLT�`,� (,0.t:�cj- :p-i..,� ..T. bL:Jl:fir,Z.0 i .iEG\ / - „"'l::.s:-e y,.,. -- +Y�i'...L•,a..:_ >''`•1/ /Pr..2 (-!/mT' 4 gL(7af. :G+lLe2 `S.P_, __` - �,,�_,._.. .Zi• c-_. .._,•..�,-`••:ice`"IJ-. F�VIGi+-r- HCD- T,i�C.coTF� ie: • <�`- ji_?r .'4 - c.sv 4: �` :4e c.e_._r l c./4 r.lr;onl rt. .1;_t.vi I' I r- - _ _ ' % �eL/j((PIr-i? �.i.ppr.l,F�p.GT=-I-4'`ls9)• I - ': •. _ \+ Arct1A ,rV e-F.I ./l rl il. (F--.2M-x-F I Lr-( 1 c?*1*+1) Y=; . I , `-,Y. - 'l _ w,-1l`E (c.,.4-c.c. F.ecG ,wiir1. a-( F,.11c ZtziGe,J-r � .N: .II i -✓'_��i?� %f _`.`; riJd�li. c�c - tii.V OZ +, ' -- p G�:a 1.I ! .w,u`}' . - . - :y (!o ,.�...Tc.+ 3:D..n Gc: ::, (Ges-o2 ..6. C•.) b ' ti :. I —.'':Ys. oi _�v, `�GLaUC e..Gr^h �-:�:"- +.'} .-y ;�t,Y'?a=as- • TLl'L4.!o,h� x�l;�l-I 2c2DC2 GO MA, it-Pr= .� } _ �. _.: _,,:;_ . ?�„J r ec�i.,,Aug- Sul- 6LLle -re riaTarf .. -.: - _ µ�f ri` ia�nc.r ca>,oZ (6ojarL T.D.r7..) _ .. •.; '�l- if---. GL OBI! �A..i.- ,:D-V [-.LI: I " -Y .�:.`y - � ~- ' - - E-4-:.G,. <PLce. - ''.." L.r F .l / - ,moor .. ,:l;oN 1-4el1,-1-r -I"' .ter.rte-ro•:ott�a Pc�l r-rc.e xr-- rt:,rU`(o-,-I 1 • • • ----' -r,./.ice 7; ?.I G.�J e>�A i G>r — F t c-_ A ' • • • SHEET CLIENT 4iro lri,-,L4- ,./" '�P<-t REVISIONS BY DESIGN • MANUFACTURING • INSTALLATIONPo.if 0 SINIOTTED TOR TOUR PER • DATE �'3I•8S I SCALE '/t°= - i' 1"r'Sa l�� F QUALITY SIGN SYSTEMS FOR DISTINCTIVE VISUAL COMMUNICATION SON CORR.,EE TS MN TO fit SiL0ER �.,.li� JOB NO. .•✓s $' Z (��'t3) z'7. 139 sti- 13190 STONE AVENUE NORTH SEATTLE,WA 98133 �"�'°`"`"'Op1C° OF 4-SHEETS SALES �. fR t�eeT L +9•$`I "r SIGN 2081385-0242 1.00R.TO °Ram r,...rr.,�.a. DESIGNER -,•PIA•1-I LAP / I r2'-o-/ \ - E 1 . : . cam- N [E SERF/ zD Nc a Lii1l0h1 w e1,C-vInoN 4. N � fl.' ) SEAFIRST S NM t 41N'at fA et2 INITEP-INA.-y It-WWI-JAW AISfl.A'fs -17-001a7 AWHINJ11 cp131NEr1>pa'-1 1`1?2.1,12e 'Ltcr f5 AueeipouND od`ID ecaDWT1DNof \VlfttE 0-113056 I:cia E1NEI'3)414- et.k1E'z82 �4.1eE-f I O et1e1/2-"2"'13*j1- D*03Z N:HN S `. 11,01 f 5DdJ11-$P0-64 0UND 'ft41h11 81.Ur*282 51-+ec > r$aN14-N GOP(TAIrrrV11 try 'GUvp,u,Av - N•G. E 1`1• . SUNT to/f)* err 1-4 W rlourrf c;CY HEATH SIGNS E s 6E - ►1I - ..... IJore0 iir l alw,far.y I i 4-II-fJ It2 ..N'10gC1.1.1 -I9 t _ A;r � Ir-rr ' IJic.- le vi rJ • hli, TiZii : .,.. .. ,..•., PI ALL MEASUREMENTS ARE APPROXIMATE AND MUST BE VERIFIED BEFORE PRODUCTION S O„ ,ii ,r . / , > fltef, INfE J/4U-Y Ii-I-LI INAc1E1 VISPLIY [1] &tl1J1 I7 DIWHINUM CA$INe:f' alf L7ArL 8RON2e • tDP Gii► J fl-AFf elkY--IROUNn-HAT/e lQ ouf-fAINf WHI?E n EI-t¢O&S t.cro f�Nc I 'PAINT Jt¢28y El-1> oeS ' PAINT RE17*p3W -/— GI% rein_QMV tAI?--PAIN"f pAR I BRDN21: f3orITAI a P-C1101.1: 4 et-it0cos COPY i ouNO 1'AINf'l i-UC 4ZS2 b 60,15056 CofY fDdIJ-f htl#If SEAF/RST &WA PARR h&I in go-ruse airr er-Nr4 f QA12-4 82ag . BANK i/A-"=I'-o• 4 I P 0 0 6.14E6'1- 2of2 1Q WA IA, AvE•IA•E• N•E • 6uN:) f • i-vf> - ,gkY HEATH SIGNS EE O. - Iq'I • 89 .,,.. FJo-r0 f i ".11¢R(io1 I4O1-1134 No .. J2•q •nal e;r _ 44 125r EANI'- RLr1TON • kJA .15 II il • 6 P 4111 ALL MEASUREMENTS ARE APPROXIMATE AND MUST BE VERIFIED BEFORE PRODUCTION 1111/16.41 iv leI Ir- I • 11 t' \, I 1 =3/ 4171 111111' ‘N\ AQE o 111 1. w'I .i • r • OF R� ECF: 02$-81 t$ © z City of Renton o ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST �9,r�o SEPTEa 4 Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). chapter 43.21C RCW. requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide Information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: - This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly. with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully. to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies. plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant." and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer." and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: �l-1�#-�► `� LL.b,L- 2. Name of applicant: S bt]1.br. o 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact-person: I i#4 Ztg 1 Or fie- h t4ot 141\11 �. 7'189 4. Date checklist prepared: S-7-g9 S. Agency requesting checklist: 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): tcxo uartme 12-e.Tkivt,t- L .51o102 c,cnv9-1-1204.Tlov 1iou-y,uv„ "S," ' .f..)-1,rT WET tN VA.* 12+E40u te1•st 6-( e.1223 t.e- x / ' 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Nb 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. GAT-1 OF- R 1c%.3 - fe7e t,r (60-tuoii-x& "e2) t2 % e-Ar) , .+2rt.t'. ,1, Pcs++3 .apppouat- - 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); 421 rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 2.% , c�Y. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example,, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils. ` specify them and note any prime farmland. 4‘c{oQ,re,t0G -{-c) '=e-S soe►ls-f. *�•PS DF* I�� TVA Jar. 464.-19eaul000 G QdJ G�K S[a i. )'? Loaa-4 d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. An A. . " c ps Foe_ - 2 - / '. e. Describe I ;urpose. type. and approximate ;.:,:hies of any filling or • grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. a,.®4.4'j ti,4//des/a/b asps! 07( •/lst 5,i�t . Art.7440414•Z/I//ood cu/ wi///eve%a;hi3r d.6NLI6 4., J25 c.... yd.... yd. sf,Doss/b/-e/I aQla...d AV/va4,0rAla/dibc-64/4#fapoi• f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing. construction. or use? If so. generally describe. T ehin/.7i.se An,lervas./eros4e.1 iara64a a/1 ? 24.4•r, ErA,r/e.!/S2404 .* Ie4i oil &l.t J . /p.percisitua wi%/A i*Pky, c4/,'o i i/. '.44(Q. /mpocl' dvr r f +_ 4a4s h,Z.e/ie., /phone g• About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? . 72 % e# siVt QTa• wi%/ !� �A£1dl �ca/.l,�/./se erHovt. Sr�r��►coo, ir/c( d..r9 �u/ia�..s� .Q.;•/GyP/z4//'cieqgc-/6i•+,Aref.r. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Sae,/.. • 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? /va • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: ,17ACN/T6..)4 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams. saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate. state what stream or river it flows into. /cm • ?Tien. /s fr7o syrAC r jy ,- u." 14, S/,/e„ e,,c4,2f a,- Se4so,t/ rat574V/00:7 o/ s 'Z i aver.?r. 2) Will the project require any work over. in. or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes. please describe and attach available plans. Na 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NSA • - 3 - / • 4) Will the proL_ al require surface water withdravw. ."r or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. • Nd 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. . 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. /%1� b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. ,ors d97Z C/47E7) 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/t. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. .5-FE /'T7i9 c/../�EaT) 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. �S'EE / 7T/,ci-j/-7ErJ7) • - 4 - 'd. Proposed 'sures to reduce or control surfa ground, and runoff water impacts. i. r „7"7"/ */1°,24•07-) 4. Plants a. _ Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: alder. maple. aspen, other 72( evergreen tree:Q cedar, pine. other $. Shrubs xi grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage. other o water plants: water lily, eel grass. milfoil. other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Szi0 T c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: See 47 cy,-,6J7 • 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: QM' ero, , eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: C bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon. trout. herring, shellfish. other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. • - 5 - d. Proposed me '• ,ies to preserve or enhance wildlife,. -iny: , See: 4i,/;rAtt-7E*-1 i 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used� for heating, manufacturing. etc.r 77J'c %iojee h/02/USe. e/e -e-/e, �y de ,er P�rp y /�ao//O&'isrps w r%/ 6 - 44c,41 e/lic*/bsce, • • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Alt c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy . impacts, if any: lfi01:01•DiJs 40s4/ sh4des 4%e or -�o►- bad,' edssi✓e-' Se,bv goi%J . ��-�c�Q-r/ � i:�.H�..� l,�i.//" 6e vs." 44. /jea,,vu apJ Q�al C'vrSf /,„:, d/ p,,%/be. r%J e'e ola e..c. rec on/ bus/d✓r•r 2Gide Cieelf,, cooled • .4n i.>Sc./ordnd/Vilcno y LvI✓/ .+*iii ,ri o6 hi9, e .oidl ey a., //Yl4ss huf re/as}roti• 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Flo. T e- .-.,S/c .s //.�:,/e-er/ vzo po10,f10;/ e.I/e-7 cc,de '1s.. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: AVA b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic. equipment, operation, other)? /f/ °nand.,/ no/sue. Sources gee. 4.s 1re.liks-fcd. rheee w'iI A- fe,,,,Drn y crewse, ✓.. ?leis.. /eva./r Q s o roe s//le. f Co-+S>`3-rde.. o.J s►c�/vi/ra.o• - 6 - '2) What typ :; levels of noise would be crest - b� or associated with the • . project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic. construction. operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. •�JG L'Ak///GA/AeC•�I�� /Dcsi9n.<.oti ��/f/e�d Ibs oresf crED4/4 Coss.•yes e.�✓mac/ C/ass �A �. /"Jam/mac vr2P.#,-,2,►.ss/L/e. /1o/su /i'ii/or// &' CO/BA . roc. /Aays c for e lo-4ozzed ic/zj cr/yi/%/Ao1 4D,rceeurl )444 e, /toeAS• 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts. if any: ems• #2 D/'4 4 4 e.r oa.a -� c�ac ccepc✓i nwri�u.�.)00 i s s� 6•d- 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Tire czo//-®►-r use c,a 4144ow7`• ceoccepp/ ,tic ryl45S1 nor-Ape-9 Pn,-746'1 4)7( vibe S/ale, y cc .r/ed 6,y r e•s1&/ Q/ I/CA. . AlktV' fat "'OP/fa east p d/�d.•4 //�o-e s c �e/ /) . Q�o�s IAA was,//e.r,st3 ram//• ?e'e Se tidi? y 7�i�l�.I��,�y� exe.ed ..4J d 7 SA4.) eVsfs ,Erm•eAfer• *. r&LIL-D+-& b COPi. L b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. ,(t/0 c. Describe any structures on the site. direr .S ry eris /& she, • /AI- Lui/;4)' �v/)/4 /' awe/mo d c ,a/ rxe u! ca.," cZ ia',94// of,SG , yor-Qj ec/• "3-eo e--s/47 59c4.btri%d 4r• s..ce q/ .3.e a, t�uc�a !�/ c. • alk 6 F,F-i-3 tz-F.t-taros c. j !PIZ, V1-c*Z _ sv� PP d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? /(/0 e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? e—/ f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? 13-/ g. If applicable. what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so. specify. A/o • i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 25 71-o 4gyp �eyo%. /� , c/vri-; 9 V-ol-c- `174.y -fs.se„v• 71i /2,/''CSd!'f c l90. 4 f #'4+,O/o5,,L042d Antes c. c,/9, • j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts. if any: ,F - - 7 - / 1. Proposed meat ires to ensure the proposal is comp..:Able with existing and • . . projected land uses and plans. if any: T!u,,22/ -dowce u. /M'/er% /j 9. Housing "(A_ •Approximately how many units would be provided. if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. b. Approximately how many units. if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts. if any: 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not Including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 77e-/q'/%s'4 I,id,A�, y 2 1 29- , lb 14 141 -L r&E- o`-p' T ",-,;740.0./ O're. ezke Ar eI/✓e/ .soy b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? /c/o eve. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 7-he.. 64' S 14/ !x' hea ve49 scree/7ed r/; /4,7S:5 c40/.?5 // d/-si 6/e, s ic%5 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? 1 pcii/ci rs ; S���st h S %IJ a'•�szu rrrd.L;it, //fhl ( -dre72'•rit-S) //7t,-ar/e,c -5-ac1/GeS o f /,*/t a,. ' /7're, / - /Oroj• Licht• /,e7;yh� -se e a/ Sus%',esse.s /give i../.1€t.141 4 /� Ar. , I,-% ' b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Aip - c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? > C //15/I//Pq li/�/J s pe2/;f0��3 of A . CacJ�D✓� iJ/4 G ilfi O.a L+� A1-4 c,,,/�/,s;A -Sim 14//42. ,. S"vvp/edC,,X1.1",". d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: ,c1 .4.-o✓%h/w./4/34,nJ orc g e`4c:/ e'cf C-471 -At+ renoch .5/77;4-/cv '/ /fvc/s - 8 - ' 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? //�� 7 t- c/oSetf / -/c ' ii-1 JG Park So/x,.ee- 7400 "04. Le) lamas, o f i /e,e,i AA -dao,v EA/c 24. ,.d Nei'6i / y 4/4.so/ ®o�i-6 or, Je,,-J/ ,d de Ave/b" ,i , • b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. �o�.e✓ c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 1•?W,: 4 'd Bch Urt4 l2vo.J4-4 �4e� 1 >4 Lb 4-t, eft,o0/ea9 A4Jk4,9tv's. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. A/D b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological. scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. ni/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: iv/A 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans. if any. rigt- si.4 4, h b4e-w-0 Qa1 o 4 cf GYca A y Luv4// /We-A/L. 4 No/ 6aw4lea9/on ►the. Bulb b y A/C Suns e/ 3 '. //c4e -74o AL & 'e Dov iJ a s of Suese f . b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? yse• ,ale,-c Beau/c e, . c9re4,. C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? /o610p,-/c/,7 g P.P. iOr op aie c/A"- / C�j.4111°D-J L40,r1,00 AEA o a/ C e-ei1.%e. Srj)Ie, • /loge !!re ?to pi '-' ' pieve...vi a f c S.?€. eipl-/do f e o d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (Indicate whether public or private). • T c. /4 ikd~co��s �x�5 � p roovl r ��c�irP..--r Of 4 a>1.ee.// Sk 7L , ,alvq// .Sv//Se-f %oiAvi.✓ti �o✓ ' U/43 2. r 4ky tvZe:/14J a��Side t�s, !/i9dsT�du�� a/4/,.4� au r,/.S'/i/ /fh/i iy Hr / ote/ - 9 - • e. Will the proii:-.A use (or occur in the immediate vi i,uty of) water, rail, or ' air transportation? If so, generally describe. • NO f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. . e's ce f9//v ofsefraes,/ g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: . /Sc�-�i 5+ �G�Q{Jt��Prl1e I)',� c�� s tea' '°--cef Are- od 4.4..,d/1 Qefilu, ' itti 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. ( see- ArrivcivM&Jr b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Z o n of Q.i/' 'a ic, S•'a'r i e. &L,1 •.K.�,u� a.�, i 4 k Seilvi c 24 16. Utilities a. Cale utilities currentl available at the site electric' aturali a, Cwat , refuse servi , telephon sanitary sewer septic system, of er. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. rr,gewe-rav 7) C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: �c� ,s��� G� c:?(� •) -4i Name Printed: Is .Pe.Ni2 { E. 141 rc- - 10 — c 4 ^ a CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN * * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * PROJECT TITLE: SHANNON S VILLAGE APPLICANT: WILLIAM E. WITT APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-025-89 The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pelding site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code, Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER William E.& CC Merriman 5103 155th PL SE 345000-0010-07 • - Bellevue, WA. 98006 Southland Corporation 7 Eleven # 16921 516970-0050-00 2828 N Haskell Ave Dallas. TX. 75221 Alec A. Brook 1726 Duvall Ave. NE 516970-0030-05 Renton, WA. 98056 Marion Viaene 2025 Aberdeen Ave. NE 516970-0061-07 Renton, WA. 98056 Pourandokht F. Darabian 2004 Fulleton Ave. Apt.504 516970-0075-01 North Vancouver BC VP73G8 Exxon Corporation SS 2421 516970-0085-09 P.O.BOX 53 Houston TX 77001 Kingsley G&M Parker 925 Kirkland NE 516970-0121-05 Renton, WA. 98055 Kenneth A & S Burr 1537 Duvall NE 516970-0122-04 Renton, WA. 98056 Robert H & Nadine Keller 11434 Des Moines Way S 516970-0129-07 Seattle, WA. 98168 Joanne B. Imperatori P.O.BOX 711 516970-0137-07 Issaquah WA. 98027 Loyd L. & Mary H. Ross 14125 SE 136th St. 516970-0142-00 Renton, WA. 98055 Garry G & Shirley Reinhardt 13645 SE 107th PL 770310-0010-01 Renton, WA. 98056 ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER CERTIFICATION I. /'S .%- /ova, hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the StatWs''" residing at PE' d 4.J bd �-� ae.•®e � I. the 9 TN day of AP2/L �� m 1, 47 0. . \ J G 8(I� I SIGNED: �,O,r•' co • 0t161 CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I. ��-�c►: hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were mailed on'iY13uc.1n'25111,61 , to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in apil for the State of Washington residing at . on the 2 9 day of > L c.A . /Ce • 112,t_ot2z2u,te / SIGNED: . FORM 20B • OF R4, 1 4'>, ECF: IO2 -oci A. rA-cr2.5-61 t$ © z City of Renton LU: all �9�SFo SEPTE 'e�P ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide Information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, If it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproiect Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area." respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 1-1�1-11-500 ivE- 2. Name of applicant: Stv�bt. o11-NML- 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact.person: C,117( ►� '""" wtu_t tia r—t- 4a 5 198� 4. Date checklist prepared: 3-7-463,ci 5. Agency requesting checklist: 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 12.eTbwtd_ Ul.5bt�� Ctn-wo rlJ4- Ctoi-) )LL "6" 1=7*-e}-1,rc 4:2470-ac4..-vw-3 WET tN Tl.a th UatLV_L-15T cze au tee-19 e i to-L,a. c oi4,t-t. . V,/ 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared. directly related to this proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Pr, 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. if known. - � ,�� P6eK,t i (60-tu01t.x& `'re.)GlT`{ or- a►aoPt -'. S(. PLA4-1 •apppoua.- - Were- 11. Give brief. complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. 5�� bc_iarE,�. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address. if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description. site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one): flat. rolling, hilly. steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Z.% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example.-cat', sand, gravel, peat. muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. 4..ccotzioto6 -to a c 4b DF4i PE '1" S Agri-V-0. 46c PCF-Vol-tt `i & ooO G t2a►J r_L'? Sb or..? Low ¢tom (' €) . d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so. describe. ,143 4 . 5otL 1- � HcoOE-et t -p ops f'=o{Z - 2 - / • ' . • a. Describe I 'Purpose, type. and approximate ;.: ties of any filling or - grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. G,.o,a4",; j.,;//eies/ar,b ,sas/ oyr 4 e $i�c . I't d //ood Cs,' n./i//i;die/tom 61 reWisidle 4/ 3'25o c.“,. yd. sf Pas-r'b1L,It. av1 a...d f'i%/va4,drie 0//1/be-6114#i epos. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so. generally describe. To �iiJi4V e,00/s?1wi/e/es•�e." Prd4iu0 ryd/1•.› /s'e4+e/aria, pej..aska4 E/A1'%04/rei . 44o%0 ab.9A0/#0,DO24d�li to vs/i%/be 14),00 e,AfgAhAto r�i/iy�2, /micver d�rNJf +. £ ash .//0-s p QJQ• v g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? , 72 % o1 Silt- QUA 4✓ii/ /�� �edI.rt�c,.,i.lf/.c.ee#-hovt. Sr/r/sre0/ //.c1,4441, �c..�e�/.-rj a.:�� i� /��c fb�/ci•�,./re1.r. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. (vF-- f/77/0 ciimeo r) b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No • 7litee /S rnd stir c r AreiP,(Qr- aJ 2/4, c, ,pf ap r Se4SO,t I FC74d w5 o f e1 4'/C'4 r . 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. ND 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A • - 3 - / • 4) Will the pr(4., al require surface water withdraw,:.? or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. • Ne 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Alb . 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. f4Z) b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. C ,�r'r- /9ir orsi�7E�r) 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/a4 c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. .'EE /Q7"7? 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. 4/4/-76,Yr • - 4 - • • 'd. Proposed asures to reduce or control surfa ground, and runoff water ' impacts, i. r /0/60i—) 4. Plants • a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other y( evergreen tree:E4 cedar, pine, other A. Shrubs yzi grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? SAW T c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve • or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: • SEA A774c/.r/6J7 • • 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: ero• , eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: CV bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. •41Ox% c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. 11/D • - 5 - i • d. Proposed mec'• ,res to preserve or enhance wildlife;: -any: rdec 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric. natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. 7 c �ieJrcL e• e%ici-e/e C; aa �r o/ 6� vt..d 07,4 A„.„,, 2c,ewce/ • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so. generally describe. A/1). c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy . impacts, if any: wii eJs Sh4de3 a '-e aryeaied400- beet pess/✓el Se by fo/;) - 6��c/Q-r. i � ii�o tr�..� 14/// , ►J /_-t. !leA,ou dpJ 4No/ Cp' .✓Sfiri<�aa:, ev/s eJ[Jrt pi/1/be. /;! .reto.deuec_, rec ehr it, bets/d/'r• etc<d &let ", ca i/•o • 42.? /rs./%lle-61 /rliscno.-", lvr// w/ii 7:airvrAom yr! / c//�/oy ✓w/eso a.,d/7V4ST Az/re.4111/o01. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill. or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so. describe. Mo. The viS/C /S //rr/i71e:4/ 710 poig., aon.24-srG�/O-! o ec/c4B-i,1s.• 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? "�� '� /J,Te7SI/4/ S ki,.ceS Q✓e. Q'9f'/cr/ e-d. rheee /v//J" fe/,,,prory i.9cr-ews-e. /iJ rlo/S42. ter/m/s qs a roe m - 6 - 2) What typ .: levels of noise would be creal b or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic. construction. operation. other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. A ,1 �9G L;7/,4e04~19/4 /l7esip744/0., 7`�iNe►d G fJda /110.11 � -ED v Coss. es' �./d / 4 C%QSS �A PA,Jr/elsc vr7ftp•-e21./s.I/Lie ilois.•-, roo 4/84 . T/tt, for at p4oased p,- ,cc//r/z/, / eiceea/ . levels• 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts. if any: ' /S is d /oi/.Lcc,o?? - -% e�x -eecv' wr/rssu r..��rn9 ' />O �- /e 'c . 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? 4•4 vacant' SdL y texceod /iJD /l9ds/ nor�io,-ey pcbe- 0-2 o7( >We .Coc e/ed by /.tea.vJQ/ 44 cs. • A/o.i &t /2or�i / was ex/st3 reh/• 2ae S e d i!/7 y G! 7�41e..1/,ey / ea.,,/a' .S 4J 7' S/JL, eXSAS Sf7ea..., I v e421F+s"er• * R,/V l4-Dt-& b cop-tee ¢ .t.L_ 1•,lF-+ ut.> .g..- b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so. describe. c. Describe any structures on the site. � 0.re- So/,ry 6wi/�wilr Gr/Sf GY/ , S;ie. . act. .w///•2.t /C1o'fO?c led ea‘/of 4..rCa/ Gi-- ez ,# J Oy 77Yca. ptj /• 143-e" "4illy, 4..scd te a-/ vZ4 �. • r s '! d. Will any structures be demolished? If so. what? /ll0 e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? &/ f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? 75-/ g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/4 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so. specify. No • i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 25 ,1c ¢o e:44e% /2,//'CSsr/ /1-c 970. •••49o%yew 7to sf/n.•... .wf S,i(4., • j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Ado Arth.. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts. if any: se �1 - 7 - i 1. Proposed mea: ores to ensure the proposal is comp�.:lble with existing and • . . projected land uses and plans. if any: fit,"ibJ ec/ svii/6 a 9. Housing Az1/4.. a. Approximately how many units would be provided. if any? Indicate whether high, middle. or low-income housing. b. Approximately how many units. if any. would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts. if any: 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s). not Including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. T�7e./a//e si 46edAv..r y y 24 /9;;r CA .LL- ¶b w°12" — 2?4rD1-1:3'' Tilt r i'ci0..v/ P,r1Pi er Abe-ov;- ,/rJd�4►rO/.3 4're de a fi✓ei b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 7?*G bz.d'%d o7s !v,%/ ,(x' heave4. screce7e1 Po i Ali /4r ?'5cG/0i--7S drI 4// d/-si6/e 3;de:5 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? / .�cii/crn S'�i-eest/ �/'-s Qn•r •Lt, /4h. (E 7'-r Uzi/ o/ /t „v/vvre, 745 /4-s- ��✓ /%sht. XI/ .szvweQ/ biisirlesceS /nay hive 4.4A b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? D c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? /.ri)/ .. ///5/..ilp, G/e,,,7 At #N.f 4E �- tsi /ix.� f''',✓� '- c a�c -7.-- 0:' w o -.si res r{.S� Lv/40fr.;I/s rr►-P�edc/� -S d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: ci I,& '% hto idy�ore. orc r'coch 5r e1r/4c o / /e.c/S • - 8 - • 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? ,/� r,ge- c/a Sesi /4./c de; 4.,.. /04.24.444i Park . o nr-e /45 v /os Z-•o Lf/eis 04 o .-C./A D ALan,-dam zeA/c 24. �ns� I4-1 i Ii y b/A,s 1 1a,-E► 6.1 /c,,-/c/3 ,d de AlE/de . b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so. describe. i✓oee. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation. including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant. if any: 4iiad ch Q, 44 !2c%./a4/i, 4 bd4-11PifP/syem QA.,�autio te-,L. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for. national. state. or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so. generally describe. A/D b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific. or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts. if any: • N/A 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 71u, Sj.4 si Av. bDC.Vl•lersl 4,4 GK,t_ W441 4.y Auv4// Ave-'i' 4.ld 6 ded on +the. Sou,[/1 by A/C Siir✓s of /r"/. /Zcc.e.s s �a S,Je H//// fig. /0 01.t David 4.4.Ad .S[n.!?j • b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? ysQ. rate.-0 S .a.u/ C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? /06/toni/c/es g .Po a eib.S ,qrn. ,,r°pa-tee/A'. SVc,VPo-7 L W:loto 4iff 'I/ lief 8 w/i."e. S.1e, • %lce..-c IJrL )10 p.ar/li.c "A-vv.: e f dok S'i;e/..t rcipI-/AO.1 e rr 1 Qct 4.t1'd e/St1 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). •7.e. /�ei�s ~aw,�s eX�S%.'p roaplr r '-- /µdi Df 4��tec.'t J,67L , ,Duvq// Sv4sc7; for w ✓.0 yo✓ 4:1,000W sides ths� �..4 .4� sA/ lj'h1/7. - 9 - • e. Will the proji mac use (or occur in the immediate of) water, rail, or ' air transportation? If so. generally describe. A/O f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known. indicate when peak volumes would occur. ee/9/�o�srrse��� g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: a2er•1.1o� /7'q/j4G f�JPOZ, W2 Loe i- -/y r#we/ /„ Or/SIi075' 'nods S a,edio#i//Gu/ !y///'sego .r� !Out/v �lQ' u�.s�f A✓� L!d • . �� Qu o Asedlt. Q�r e� 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection. health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. C5' ArrArymndor b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services. if any. ra ,7 v/ QH/iq'. 5��a'/ c 4a�1 .ia��te� d.H pc,.4 Ice, SCl2•4J/chile . 16. Utilities a. Ci le utilities currentl available at the site electric- aturalis . wat . refuse servi , telephon sanitary sewer septic system, of er. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Tjye/v"-/e,u T) C. SIGNATURE I. the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. ��5«`-� Proponent: .2-e-4 - G ,�[ G 6 ?-41 Name Printed: l‘'7odAv/2 d 1-14 W N-1-1 644 E. • • - 10 - 1' CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN * * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * 1. PROJECT TITLE: SHANNON' S VILLAGE APPLICANT: . WILLIAM E. WITT APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-025-89 The following Is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of*t1he per)ding site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code, Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title 'IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER • William E.& CC Merriman 5103 155th PL SE 345000-0010-07 ' Bellevue, WA. 98006 Southland Corporation • 7 Eleven # 16921 516970-0050-00 2828 N Haskell Ave Dallas. TX. 75221 Alec A. Brook • 1726 Duvall Ave. NE 516970-0030-05 Renton, WA. 98056 Marion Viaene 2025 Aberdeen Ave. NE 516970-0061-07 Renton, WA. 98056 Pourandokht F. Darabian 2004 Fulleton Ave. Apt.504 516970-0075-01 North Vancouver BC VP73G8 • Exxon Corporation SS 2421 516970-0085-09 ' P.O.BOX 53 Houston TX 77001 Kingsley G&M Parker 925 Kirkland NE 516970-0121-05 Renton, WA. 98055 Kenneth A & S Burr 1537 Duvall NE 516970-0122-04 Renton, WA. 98056 Robert H & Nadine Keller 11434 Des Moines Way S 516970-0129-07 Seattle, WA. 98168 Joanne B. Imperatori P.O.BOX 711 516970-0137-07 Issaquah WA. 98027 Loyd L. & Mary H. Ross 14125 SE 136th St. 516970-0142-00 Renton, WA. 98055 Garry G & Shirley Reinhardt 13645 SE 107th PL - 770310-0010-01 Renton, WA. 98056 ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER • CERTIFICATION • I. ioun.e-/' /ova, hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the Statw •. f :rton residing at Pe d,cJ �• F the 9 TN day of el L t y� : :°�� �&�r o A — 0 . V 110r4 ..• •m z*@�• • SIGNED: IC ; * ot.••.8 1�G oft CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I. -,.arArca, �cr hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were mailed onlvl3u& 2? r f 9��� . to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in a for the State of Washington residing at on the 2 9' day of > tg/`ce- I . q lb-2,1te; � SIGNED: FORM zap