Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA97-009
SW 1/4, SEC. 30, T. 23 N. R. 5 E, WM • CB GCE i /CTR,6 c(s Nws 1E 6c wvNEc'+.w.n GB\ o~C(sW,-,BEz/eo.•,Sac(x,-,Ses EX CB I BaE x.GR, GNC(w•,B6J E EX 6 \ / S.W. 34TH STREET �KIl( )-,., m I 1N C °° 6 B9 ® ° °°° m E,,,:' '- - .° m m / _ • !► `i1�► f! °OO• 8 \ , -Ex ASPHALT.!?_-tE-- ' I RUGGER e B/B i4 VASES 1 w _ �_--/ $ N87'50'23'W_ 11985' ma tl Ex.ASPHALT PROPOSED SEE ' ` -to n R wsi w �a:uU A: TI Ill1- N e F..RE H,CRAxr ;•, k • f ew ��CONCRETE PAD 10 D 20 GRAPHIC0SCALE 160 DATUM gy{;y.Tp� � IKON �S_ Y Ex,z'GATE VALVE w01EF HORIZONTAL DATUM: �\ Ex?VW /{®ye/!�{:,,,,....A- yyzl'Yt� 'ii'iiLf�! . ,1� _.. ;L{ __ CITY OF RENTON sO `.� �� ■ 0♦ f���I� '4 ..... Na]'S0'z}'w (WRIT) NaD 83/9t \� °1 / ��. � Idly " 5� yJ I Ex RE nvORnry 1 iM=10 IL VERTICAL DATUM, S /�� roO'Ex SONN / \ U T.M Ro„ ��rGEsurE A J / \ r ) ♦\ �-�� C11Y fX RENTON afi. OOO carv<(1-,z.+ PmARKINC t i \ I CONTRg11NG BENCHMARK: 10 LOxtr,E(s.N)-69a 11 f xR\ R ,STRET LIeAs`� fIV/izEOU PMENT 1 1 I f 1. TOPOGRAPHY FROM SURVEY BY HIXtTON DENNIS h CITY OF RENTON BENCHMARK N0.6]2 YARD ` ASSOC.,INC. CHISELED SQUARE IN CONCRETE WALK Ex B,z carEv j�S.RGa. �/ \�____h-� 6.5 FEET REST AND 1.0 FEET NORTH Ca Rssux t - {�� 'MB W ,' ' i I 2. IMPROVEMENTS SHORN ON THE EARNEST STEEL SITE OF SERVICE ENTRANCE DOOR TO riu••s+° \ / 'w 1> A (��. a you I I L LAB AND THE ACCESS ROAD EXTENDING TO LIND AVENUE SAM YOUNKER'S DATSUN.• m B .cts.rvET-R,B i■ I1 - _ •"j ARE PER PLANS PREPARED BY HORTON DENNIS h ELEVATION=20.9( \1 v I r\\s5uw \.BOOIw.POZ BB 3 A xLx-x-,-x-a-L 1 I. '1 C ____ ASSOC..INC.AND ARE UNDER CONSTRUCTION AS BE CONTOUR INTERVAL-2 FEET I �_00e 1� jg(srvET — ___a_ -7/ / `I II 0 UTILITY EASENENI FUEL STORAGE • ADD CONTIBMIENT A. • I in �1111 I,R'Da U�°' (]).s,r e m.o\s, \ i MELD N¢ 1oI,M1 Lw,FEN¢Tw. I1 a _ 1 R S1 �� .Ltn .1s e. •I PROPOSED 9m sF Bona•RFn I ,' ; 51'®45 1'• / „_,L.To„ °OS•�R �I+ us-a+ GE 1 p �BUILDING 108 S \ I61x li I I ® SI b� I.A's I to YQtgF- I S8CURE s)T I aI a RReAaATOR EOUIdMENT - z ,N I1Eacc6c(x,=,ze• © YARD1 G9 iiii��W U EQUIPMENT / w A9'xuTI ••' , ,z.,s YARD (� ( \ III _ \ II a I UAR RR ( � I 1 • e oI I" I I OS° /. \ Ex 0'RAWR AGIEA /� ` It.. Y `E� 10=,0'S8'36' �� f I a I LEGAL DESCRPTION 1 b TOD IF t3 So•OM ` R=38084' / / j / I A PORTION O SWTI NEST OF SECTION J0, II ■a w L=4]1.]8' / `/ I/ j TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE 5 EAST,W.M., : //J ( DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. ] 1i ED IN VOLUME 161 ¢ % III/9 I 4,e 5< •TiW•RCA% - ENCLOSURE \\\ '' 4*I/I //I 'I ill LOT B OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN BINDING STE PLAN L U/ r g I -1S ® 0/M� � � �' I I/ I, OF PUTS PAGESE8 THROUGHR MAP L 1 INCLUSIVE,UNDER y i! (//.,,I","/-/ 8 i RECORDING No.950630296,RECORDS OF KING II / w , i:q, / III COUNTY.WASHINGTON. Z4L 41i / A. . -,-._ . 0 ./,/„/ .„.,,, L., 1 1 I � • � .. i •rorr) 11 j I f J/�f STORM WATER DETENTION y / e$S \ / M®N t �fC '` •r 11 -r' I \i,.zs x /' POND VOLUME REWIRED FOR 15' r ;n E \ /. - j�� / t N , ° 1 \ �� Efw.s EN)=g B, \ • t.+ / - �o / - ACTIVE DEPTH=13.000 W FT. ss J / STORMWATER DETENTION PONDS g8 O %� 1I,.�uI / - --- J--- ACTIVE STORAGE:1.5'(ELEV.13.5 to 15.0) R ¢�ERE / /a I.1'\ =y DEAD STORAGE 3.0'(ELEV.10.5 to 13.5) = L-- I� ��� ��- INVERT ELEV.OUT-I3.25 o--� -� - OVERFLOW V. = - 3 STREET.O.t aN __ __ __ S _ ,B - -1 _ _ --_ i 0.0 C.c BASE �- [x ir� -� Ex 13.50 --- z sO _ ,B- ( \1E 'KO' ,e L TA T ETNIF81EECE EV O®NA�ANY X -0 x R. _ - _ .c s•, _ pi -- fii D DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS I � - V- 31 EASEMENT x a EP O fi PVC00.,e 13 R = 05,3'S9" now ILO (zn)Ms.i�xsn°ilu(MT uz=MAYOe Aaw'Ia MGM 0=O]'S1'28" R= 02.3' - R=605 e]' L=2]I4' NARY CITY OF RENTON L=8309' . ASP nlr ri (UNDER cw000100 TEAssucxT EXISTING SO RAILROAD EASEMENT �,BASx 1E 12 CONC-1436 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS .= ARE(NGwEBAEE> For Review / Approvals Only p ,qy 05 wATSI 00 s+aG \E. CB 1rvGPE TRUE NOEL BASE �E(E E•,°,. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SANITARY S (am GRADNO PLAN -900 CONC(53E3-1362 1 E.,a G°xN`fin=9 es CONC-tt (W).12 4 UR RENTALS-FENTON ERE OVERFLOW EL 1609 109z OEaam:MI JMN/MS 041E:1/15/97 n.rwT O•�ie%IOI.DMC SCAM 1• 40' ono 08 naz. BE N[NSo1 eY ,.RR wiE � ....,.._..�® DEED 1 OF l u !.... , 1 xxl____ rHINtaHNUC?K CHttK 12HtENlihLT- -- - ---I -- — II PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT PRINGBROOKGREENBELT PEDI 53 + BURLINGTON NOR ERN INDUSTRIAL J -•I giAvayn RAN • P W l 93 /g ` / LIND AVE t i C tn 1Ni►76F1;. 4 TEi4K4 N' 33 --kAd lanan waif PARKING meI r. W > Z BURLINGTON NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL m C PARK THEATRES' _ ' r CD FUTURE • " 0 3 ; -I r 1"--►0. m m -Z. w J T T 1 j _ w ::: G __ -, say.rCAD oiR i IPAIKIIGIIIII� t EAST VALLEY I Vi�LE FREEWAY D r r \ Nr1 IT' , g S Mm xm sri gpTMSTREETs1T Brumbaugh R Associates /p Fy • PLANT SCHEDULE II7 R..wirrinf e4- a� ..... -_-- - M 04su SYMBOL OTT. BOTANICAL NAME/COMMON NAME SIZE NOTES - � / INIMMIMI -.-_I e TREES 105 ' 221 F NUS PBIPSYLVAN CA SIMM r/SPEEN ASH B CAL B.B 5113,M TGNED FORM ms QV, Ie � � ��TIy0p � ' CARPELS BEIULS PA5n61ATA./COL MNAR EUROPEAN N0wm0AM 1-3/4•GAL ,MAr0IED Form DATE 1541E k .caa "�d'V: 1� 'S/���� BNB MAr I/IV% SFR \\ �` •.' 4 BEMA JACAEMONTII/JAO.EMOxn B RCx 1-3/4•CAL. C ED FORI4 y I e B.B e¢ ` x 1 i5 1..4' AM MM S reoomeIs/T.NO FLOALRIN6 CIEPRY I-3/4•GAL 543 HATCHED FORM �., T"' _•� D BEMA PAPYRI FERA/PAPER BIRCH I-3/4•GAL B.MArGED FORM A.•,„r•. �µ I O R AGB2 URCINAMt/VINE MAPLE -9/4'GAL. ML RNS FORM ,;.. q bal'-4 1.Ff 24 SHRUBS IIIIIIIM IC rue y ! ,�1• ....:.�.' h.. ...:'. - I o 61 TWA O.nvRAMIDALIs'/PYRAMIDALI9 ARBORVITAE B 0. BNB,RILL AND BUSHY DFSEIED� M. ' '•• - _ • RA 14 4 M FULL FOLI DRAM H. a � . - !I y RHOPODE DFON ANAH KRUSCHCE'/RODOD012RON 24'-SO.HT. AGE.40'OG •�1` D W KA ---1 9, ___ i •• II NS IOn IEMFPOGALLIS 9�E4.LA D.OFO'/DAILILY 1 6AL IW O.. CHECKED CS DATE OW • M_ s ';ii 4 'i I FL 42 v LUSITANIGA/PORTLEAL UOREL 24•3O'HT, FULL FOLIAGE,b'OG. - & 1 { APO Ill N 4T PWMF LAURpLERABIS'OTTO LUMEN'/orr0 WYKEN LAUREL 24•_00'vF2 FULL POLIAeE%•OF. + 4 M I ' 1I AZALEA NINO CRIMSON'/H::: AZALEA 6AL. POLASE3S'OD. .v[01 sii.2i:;: 4 I , I . IIIIIIIIIIIIUIUIII NEDRA IE A NA4�E'/HALE�r II Ly��TiY.' q 11.1 �, E��_ EROSION CONTROL HYDRO.. SEE SPEC Y l;l; 'I'; ;�11 I. _, .1 SOD LAM SEE SPEC `,I I a, "'�"i� \ __....„ B� / I I� II LANDSCAPE NOTES: Nil 4: • / p J 6R COVER SPCI.FADER ALL COMPLETE ANDOV 3 e CANOPIES ATE CO �l`.:;3' BEDSSPECIFDm6i w.TED TO REGE1VeB6Raurocm/ER. IN ALL PLANT. INASE J_ Q al$ '� L 2 DN K Px°^"ARC ARE BASED ON THEY SITE FLAN ARCHITECT;a- ' D�bbx CHANGES TO E SITE PLANS M GN MAY REQUIRE AD 3 H N o :IIMMEDIATELY a , RPor°moo �l, _ 3 IBGGDITI IGNMArA AFFECT EHEAL.GFP Ax >"•+/ `., 11_ / 4. TNO HE E--EFE r YEAR, ICIDESARRANTEE,TTOIS USED ON-me PRo.�r SITE DIAS. p 888 1�L6 JN �� �� - \axaw�ws*`c _ ss { :� �E� \�Via\ �� S 3 I.' I,IP\ -.:AZ.'4:,.. NQk ;:.:'--.',N.\\.k,' 1..dA.11A., limo . .. = o co - ,8-. , Allr<000 Ur CC i r z L • o ca• 40' aD GO' '�,r a O `� —I 1" W {fk T �,,, i�,1;., SCALE r=no'-o• r, r�1 .•1T4 IEEs»r. ATxRZE:r t `z J� ...-r; 00*0 6Eu&A Y. U 'MT CROW • All m Wet 17.5111510 CO > "4.,• u C 4„ A° BAPX NUM MRS III !t;.� r.l ' G cb ,.. B wBL TO CONSIST I Pro,,,,,,nx Z O Z ,a ,;.r �r. .-.- '4° VDFam`11.� j�l ,T�,RwnF REc�TIm1 ~J OF '.y.IIR,: :'i1•.,wem ii a,.«-'.. _ ,,,..,N.,, sR,,00 j�l 2 cv erclr®wul Q CC W W CC ILI .,,.,, KamEUL. ARu6.ru M,N CC R V. i , 4 x`. a •A IIJ1111 i=iiiiii= R001EA,. ! _ KE g O B�M�N IIIIII_ EIIIII I B�,CH BIB HA,IRI._ Irt B flB 43 y 90vL -•...riiiq' BR ro:sVI 0..0.0044 .,;. =11111: IIIJIII — ruuiale"=""'ti r W Cl) „11 6 ;T,I i I, IIEIIm1=111111=111111=111111=Ium=11111E ai z.B1E-, RTr1 r m , '�, ', AE 1111=IIIIII-IIIIIL=—IIIIIL=-111111=IIIIII1111 f`i'ihul-:..;,-::,,:;-,....._In11i 111 mMe a j y V >f ; ___� _ _ =_ 111111 IJIIII =111111=IIIIIIJIIIIIJIIIII0_ - 1 2 X ROOMALL SA 1, RT T05 INCE THER.1E41 m I WE DRaRANTTOEE v ,. T xS L-1 O &ROUND COVER SPAGINS Nrs O SHRUB PLANTING O ON GRADE TREE PLANTING NF NIS 8882 CSC IC R:CIL HOMES 133C WINOO T S I. OIUINe IONe AR6 tAF/N O /41 Op BfUO DR YA90NRY UNL B 'i DfXaRMIB6`YYANRA4tOR f0 VIRI/Y AW DIWN910N9 IN fN[ I. fIN I6N6R AB NIf AND{SiIN6U15H6R-At,'YVDUNfID 16L0 PRIOR f0 D N6 MORF. R6G656fO,BY R6IN u006L N0. -- R-Z694 I LDOR 6LOVAf IONS AR/fAF6N/ROM iN/•O- INIBN L GAR/U 6N{RIO.V1LUY1L0RU5Hio4fIN eHT/RING, 2. fIAD41L6V6L' fYI{,2MB.4,N0.YPS 0 O 5. viDYevN Y.^ei'Re RI016fANf WOUY BOARD Af INK ARMS ANO 2. AIR I ODIVR/49OR BY U.B.RPM.- 6 Y/LNANI4AL MARIN". 4. pR0VIa6680UNv Aff6NUAfl ON BLANR{f Af fDILIf MN ML49. 3. MX BIDB- { YB1N6 MINN..56 ImMil 5. DIYINSIDN6 BUPOR0900 00AL6. B. 866Bp a NG6VRA�IN69.6NOM6R AND OD RAM- V�IIII ' OLOLfRIGAL HANN.-SOO 410fRIOA 1 m L .1111160. 6. fL6GflI4AL DMMIN64. SAA j71::::::::jil Pa127o7o0a 'TAPES 4oYVR40660AIRDUfL6f- B. 1-1/2•X 15 64.HANDRAIL,2'-0•WV.N061N6//INI6N KAM-1,AIWA, a LINO O/ VIRXAN6 ABOVE. 6Xf�RH R MAW BYBi/Y� v u7m U/A4fUR/RID Y/fAL BUILDING 10.N Af fNl6 WALL • 0- 11.60•IAGABSAOL6 OIRGL/Af i01Lai ROM. 6 w_. DN6'ROVR MALLS .. •--• 21t6 DI.2 MODD BfUv6 12.5'-0•NM pLA9f I4 LAYINAf6 f.V.BHIL/. W q. efVOf?A�b6 BUY4EOARON6A0NY810{SB 13.PRMABRILAf6D YIfAL BUILDING-AAA uANu/A4NRM•B DRAMIN69. %f6N0 fl[/A986u0LY f0 RDO/ n m m m O • 1-23 1 8 0V4f0RA ABOY{.MD 1,.,NDNi 6N X,•D fAN4R/f{pILLSD Bf6/L PIPE pOLLAR06- 190. n�a pRDV106 R-ID Mff IN9ULAfION. I5./L64fR14 MAt6R 400L6R �Uc%A m I gel I--T fIRI DR pARt6ipIH� 16.fR6NGM DGIN-B6//LUYBIN6 DMMIN6B. Y W uo 6 q v m.� I c ', - - INN. 0�1/16.O.G. VONs LAYIR-YB' 1):I LAf/9 fLDM/MARI LING./a 41VI R sYi� X'6YIBUA BOARD 411 BID{. n 6 YCiU.- Xf6ND NfIM 85/YBLY f0 RDOf 10.X.H1R/A66 DRAIR4apfOR-6 AMIN65. BfRUGfYF{AODV6. !HAIL 6.00 RAM 9V9f/Y-BY U.O.RINfAL9 f/RIDV!MRf1fIO0N, 20 X.XIfN HANDRAIL. -. INa10/D%6 /•`I000 BYUOS �� 1RN.D�n I6' M/ONI 0MY6R-5/B• 21.R{4fAN6ULAR RDDY/LOOK 6Af6 A`5 ADgA0NN1 f0 MARfNON5t, 22.40UNi/R-BV U.B.R6NfAL9. plOVI R- ff IN6ULAIION. y-{{L6pNLNI BA4FBOARO-516 aL6GfRIGAL DMMIN69. INfIRIDR pIJC GAF.. RNVO I IB Y{A1N LINKS 2,.LO4F/R9-BY U.B.R/NfAL6. CI. .)n 6 O.L.M/LX /6N41Ni. ¢OVIO%IB eAOia,6' T 1 Z6.25. ^NA.41tUN ✓ © F Z ZI<,�tU 1 IU L I L..I;i 1"L.;aHDDAR /U�vps L gi UYGO ARVNO GAB 6�B, 2)• AND�AWYM/X�0'aHI iN/RI MAINB401 p[OV101 R-196OA,INOUL.Af IONNo 0//I4/e, F,,,L.,f/NOB Rp 12'66YONo SINE. y. 2'%0'NOY.e - a O 0 0 O 00-D O 0 O O O ,I i ,..6. D• ],i. • dDPI I I a 0 I a �. WIN ,iael ASH :,....,_„„:„..] ® 6. Y 1A o : : : :::::.„‹..::„ „.;;„„.;.] R . ,,. ,_„, ,V� o- �I►� � � s Noo4 a m o N s © ~ n , o\NI pI IP .� UMW( $_ 121!'t.1 43. I♦ o- 84 ® € 3 8 . jE6��� f of a of l• YU m 1 u D D co I -r- 1-31-97 I I NOTED I d®®47 ppd I O O ! -d• �� O - axW L I 863E »--- t-4.97 • 14 IpG30O JC64 DQ4G^Q ' mm mp 4om-K--------___.. - SITS AREA: = 4. 172 AG - =161>732 S.F. a °� f — S.W. 34Q�J �"�Q��4._ 0U I L-O I N& AREA: = 1 0>600 5.F. s d nmm RE1All-/OFFICE AREAS - 3>500 S.F. zx E- 5 67 50'23' E SHOP SAYS - 6>300 5.F. ;4'mm 350.47' N �.. �� MEZZANINE StORA&E = 600 S.F. I ri:E1---------// �"r. ;.- " -- GOVEREO WASH RACK = 1>390 5.F. J L 01151'014ER g I.Ot COVERAGE 6.6 PERGENI POLE�MOUNt6O PARKING sAr EOU I PMEN1 = % 616NA6E YAR°II amm ' I OCCUPANCY GROUP: -- �.-_ EEEEE IL- OFFREfAGES 0 ourSHOP SAYS = S-3 I 1YPE OF GON5IRUGIION: V-N I� C EMI AOOVE bROUNO L___ �� FUEL 6fORA6E Q Ng EA5EMENf �� PARK I N6 REOV RE°: 20 51ALI.5 PARKING PROVIDE°: 24 51A1.1.5 d i J k, a OUILOING NEI&H1: = 21' - SECURE 1 EOUIPMENt REOUIREO SE1SAGK5 = 20' <( o EO YI PRM°EN1 YAR° PROPOSE° SEISAGKS = 95' MIN. . CD .41111 d �`�.- FENC I N61 Ai NK—~ I I .I RR R.O.W. i n r L-.I y 6 ' P WROU&NT IRON WA5N RACK AND MASONRY N FENC IN&Af 2 g o 'iREEi FRONtA6E5 W $Y .„. Z _M W O , 0, ©$ 1 4J a S O J x i &RAVEL. a g -. PARKIN& (�� - AREA �: _ P V . IIIL 8 OE1ENf ION " :2.12: AREA 5EE CI VNIL PLANS • ....7 g ay PLOY 3o4C PLAN I° = 40.o' m s 1-31-97 NOTED JNW 9838 ® ® T ® © O°° 0 � � ..„. .•10 �{I o le � l l �++I+i-i-FI-I-+++I+-4-i-NF'H+++i-1�-1-I-+I �.,'�'-�,+---�-� -A-----�- _ . __1J-- '.... -'-------<t.-b�_mil/D T c,„__ Y' J � oil •Ir aae o°O a`o-' . p QUa 1 _ . 1rr_ ��i d v Am m . Q II le 20 10 °A m c9 0 ' CS4 ELEVATION C3IEVRnIO4GS �J • (mil I. Y{fAL R00/IN6-00YONO 0O O O 1� 0 8V G 86AU0Ul A,A Ar OOrONO{/INI BN r I I I O 0. /OP 0/ Btr c LOOR. 9fANOING 9{W WA,AWNING •20 [� 9 e. RAIN W0 OV{RrLOR- •l O. 'Cia:::ii:iaai:iaaiiaiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii t -H 1-1-F1 -I-I-r H+ H+ H-i-1- Hii+l{_ B. /INI9N iRAOt •11_.i1111111111111111111111111111111►. 1 �f is,,,, ,. LRNLR{f{.ALA PLAMM ARAA III _— W. LL{AR SIN6Li cLA{0 YINOORS IN AWYI NUY/RAY{8 O O 10. YH 0�3AL ROLL-UP ODOR 5— II. 60L10 LOR{Y{fAL 0004 I�t'3 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1 66 —ZI. TIT / 11. OVAPORAf IVt 600L0R8 ONNROOr 1800 BI CNAGtrI{Rolf ORAR IIN6S WA INc m OD C. CS CDd c� "� I). ALUYINW 8f0Rt/RONf 4Y9f. 18. NO1 U8{0 - 00111,1Ta ELEVA DOB HOWTH ELEVATION VATIOa .R0N6Nf IRON GAft -I/e' I'-o' -I/b' • I'-0' 20. OONG O",/1.60 BOWL 11/0 00WAR0 ■ a O IT . — Pf 410 I . . . � — -- - aS 11 ill 1 di m2 i , - I a 6e1!:a 0 11111 I ©/ $s II 111 11 0 • EQS4 ELEVATION VATIOOa -I/O• - I'-O' 1-31-97 NOTED ]NW 9636 a.41 ru rU .30 rr. rU ro G1 '•O Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South • Renton, WA 98055-2189 tv BILL OF SALE Property Tax Parcel Number:125360-0070-04 Project rile N. LUA 97-009 rSuct:;n:crscctionL ltddressind/SW 34th 400 Lind Ave. SW Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released. Additional reference numbers arc en page Gri nfor(s): Grantcc(s): 1. Powell—Orilla Associates 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation Cad 2. The Grantor,as named above,for,and in consideraticn of mutual benefits, hereby grants,bargains,sells and delivers to the Grantee,as named above,the following described personal property: C /14 30 L F tf--c (✓ ' ,t,u By this conveyance,Gut-tui•will warram and ddcnd the sale hereby made un:o the Grantee against all nr.J every person or persons, whomsoever,lawl\:lly cl:umin.g er to claim.the same This conveyance shall bind e heirirs,���ors, administrators and assigns fo'cvct — t 3 II u'II,1i SYS',t'RM\R411NC0UT\oC41 DOC.Uh rnitc jl I i Perin 84 0001/bh „ IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. P , ' R W/ POWELL J')L)�g.Lc — ram /�5Sdc. 4 C, 1 ING INDIVIDUAL F'ORMOFACKNOWL�OMEN7T —+~ . Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) D t certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Tr' j signed this Instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary ect for the uses and purposes mentioned In the instrument , NotaryPublic in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires; Dated: REFRESEATATIVB Fottili J 'Aan w.E'DGMF T Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ' 0-1-eir IQ 1 • P zu tl-L signed this Instrument,on oath LA'- stated that he/ehek#ey was/wt a uthorized to execute the strument an acknowledged it as the V dJVbt.r Pi '„� • of •pe_ue t.� 1"1��t�.L-L-(r to be the free and voluntary act of such • C 1 . . part /parties for the uses and purposes mentioned In the instrument. • N Public in and for the State of Washington%as rl � �( - Notary(Print) YI 1(' 16 ,Yr1,4- My appointment expires; 11 l0' c _ —D Dated; l t ^ (3 ° `f 7 Jf 0) 1 C PORA E FORM OF ACKN ED , NT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss I COUNTY OF KING ) - On this__ day of ,19__,_,before me personally appeared to me known to of the corporation- that executed the within instrument,and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free end voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said Instrument and that the seal affixed Is the corporate seal of said corporation. Notary Public in and for-the State of Washington Notary(Print) • My appointment expires: Dated: _.--- - f 07/31/97 14:17 FAX LJ 001/002 91 -0091SA - ecr SGA CORPORATION 6414 - 204TH STREET, SW, SUITE 200 LYNNWOOD,WA 98036 Fax Number: (425) /778-2196 DATE: 7" 3 ( 7 TIME: PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING PAGES IMMEDIATELY : TO: OF: - ' /1 D RE: Cis fal c FROM: COMMENTS OR SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: A/ (e_ 41,__ Total number of pages,including this fax cover sheet: IF YOU DID NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES,PLEASE CALL: (425) 778-2191 This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is transmitted and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination's, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and return the original communication to us at the address above via U.S. Postal Service. We will reimburse your for the mailing costs. Thank You. IF / .. 07/31/97 14:18 FAX _ . -•-,7:9•.;,.5•41-....-.fivii,k74$9,44-UPRII•sret,7,,,-,, • ' •••';'•••,••:,.yr.•'••••!.-.•,-,•-•`...•-••:"-: ' / 1 & 6 {-1.6i-:( • • • . _ . • .... () —)E .,e/i—d. --‹ - , ' . .,.. • . . A, ,.,• • . (/ .. ihi (qi . Z. i: /NA, _ck.-t, T-ecf64- L--C6 . if t 1) '<iN>,,' '"-1.. , y: ii,, 1, .- . , . ,p ... A . t,,v\ ,IotnialQ___ ,..--,1.,., \. , . /49 . \''k‘/---.' ..9P.. ' " •i/p,.,:: +-c, -61/Qz_ c -C.•,I.Q-` 1 . . . . . 1"`. „...,.k„,.,.k:.•-, . , • AN..." • C's3if / — • _,.•046,,,i': • tlir\"-- eV- 14- - -- --- \ ••• " -'-, AkA-40.44,Pt:' . - ' , \P / sk'."(•"/,' . . ...- • . . . . , 4- 04246/AtitC607/4 4_ • /_,M. ,Qr. 1A"ok ,i .ke v\ottx9- . ,, .A / „/.. 0 , k, . 1' • /e:A 0 1" fe.ofee -tc. NAND_ \ (4,14(Cale_ 'i• ...xi :: le i . , --.. I i • 1 -.I,. t IcNvL p -e_dcikco- .ii\PA-, i - It 4' 1 -,-: , • - 021• , 1 ft) , ID A --"-----11 - .71N-iiiq P6q4C-3 4 s• i,,,i,9 (0,0t-ccocr\ \\ ) (69 b 5-1,Jah i , ,..____... s? ... go / ,i,1 , 1 i A 1 ‘ .• 1 • A e- ' :.• ;,,--.1 iQ._Gfrut.s1,--T-• c).<*)-cu,v1 ... ' q .10i - ..... -. -...-.... .:.: .......?, ...t.;., .... ,.. , .. .... .; ... . , s . .:'.. .. ' , A- (4 ' ' .. *. . . . . . . .....it : .......... ::......'1'..-. .....-''1 : ..:'II., . . •.' ..- . -...... .... '..... ... .. ... .--- 0 :. . .. . . . . \--- t,--.Z .,. /,4-I-o-i,-- i i (.-- - ,crAcz, rcefr. 4-EZ,F V z /?,C) 47- .1.•1 S,-.) .. . - • • - ...•• • ....:.-E. • . ' • - ' . . . . - . 1 06/09/1997 14:52 2068228759_ H D A PAGE 01 E' . TREECE & COMPANY e e ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS 320 2nd Ave South,Suite 200, Kirkland,Washington 98033 Phone(206)822-2577 Fax(206)822-8758 June 9, 1997 Mr. Peter Rosen Associate Planner City of Renton Building/Planning/Public Works Dept. 200 Mill Avenue, S. Renton, WA 98055 RE: U.S. RENTALS,RENTON, WASHINGTON Dear Peter: After our recent discussion, we have re-analyzed the area necessary for computation of required parking spaces. Our analysis now shows the following: 1. Professional Law Offices/Business and Retail Stores (3 - 5 spaces/1,000 sf- avg. of 4) 3,500 sf 9 spaces req. 2. Warehouse& Storage(1/1,500 sf) 800 sf 0.5 spaces req. 3. Uncovered Storage Area(1/2,000 sf) 55,100 sf 27.5 spaces req. The above brings us to a required parking count of 37 which, while shown on the-architectural site plan, was not correctly identified in the project data. The site plan has been revised to reflect this count. In calculating the parking required for the uncovered storage area, we deleted the obvious drive and maneuver areas. There would be additional drive and maneuver areas within the storage area for maneuvering equipment;however, it would be difficult to assess exactly how much area that would entail, hence, the above is a conservative approach. Peter, again,we appreciate your assistance in resolving this issue and will revise the architectural site plan to reflect the above number. We would appreciate a call at your earliest convenience. Best regards, TREECE&COMPANY. .. 7671 1� . 4tleyr Fax Nate i. past co- �-4, Barton G. Treece, Jr_, P.E. �' BGT:vg:ro.609 06/11/1997 11:08 2068228758 H D A -- PAGE 02 - - JOB L!5_,-_-,S_Ir --- 1yV., TRE � CE & COMPANY ENGINEERING-AND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS SHEET NO of 320 2nd Ave South,Suite 200, Kirkland,Washington 98033 CALCULATED BY DATE Phone(206)822-2577 Fax(206)822-8758 CHECKED BrYI6r DATE .�1 67 - /SCALE ' ie.ili'{V j I I , i 1 : ! 1 $ I I --• - i.. .- 1-*--4'- ;--t- t---.►.• , - . :. -t _ ;. : . i.... .4. i .• • . : : . , . . . • i , - ' . ` .. i � , . i 1 i�i - -^-i^^-'�•--mot.---T.._ +.. i..__-1--- - ..t......,...--+----1--+-.... -- , .. , j i i _.. _ . . 4' f•.--E-' 1 4--.-.I .- .^�'._ ..i-•. .. .i•. .i. i _... .._. ' - : . . ! : I I • , I • ..i t_ : ._ 1-. ., .-.._ ._. .. - ._ ._-- -, , _t ;. ;._ .�• ..fit.. .. ;.. .,.. : . i i • 1 r 1.1 i • , i i • - - .. : • • . i I •-•1- • . • ._.. ,--1.._*_ ••i-• ---f--.- I_...i. 1._.....y...._: .....l_"__'__. _.T._..... ...•. i I I _�_ Y ,1 } • ` 1 1 1 , i 1 i i ' 06/11/1997 11:08 2068228758 H D A PAGE 03 • -- -._ -- 8 .VW . 34 u a 8 7 GI EE IE 4 -- - -----'--- -- • 5 67 50 ' 23" E • 350. 47' / __.. • /K----:—'r - • i / ® ' cuyTOM£K U 1 P M:1•1 T • � ! f PAKK11%W Y ACZO I / 9OL£ MOUN'f£O _ t,/. SIGNAL£ aO \� 1 Il _ wi+ nmatom.:., • I own 1 Ciiiir:i I .. d► `rli: 1 ‘2211 .0.c. • ` AOaV6 C�KOuNc '• eUEL STOKAGE • a ��° v..4E -+o t nl tiA4M£NT I { n 1 x' Fa.r• y7 �t SEGU j .1 i U 1 PMENT l ! I QU l If • Y ACZO' ) . ;•i I % 4: : , t f {H I j Iif pE G{NG AT i ' •4 l R' K. O.W. j / i i ' 99,V . / - ICorr AEG f�[, Ps'A ' • / 761 G+-O -rxE RAGK ' / , wKOu&NT IRON r- ' ' ANO MASONRY / 41 IPtiNG{Nb AT 4. 9 E�1 S• NTACs£5 �_ •i * Lir i �w pi j H • ,P o I S PARK I Nly %) v •o AREA ,* P • r .� .4 • I ic - - —��� ..✓'- Q 1 I!#I T. TREECE & COMPANY ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS 320 2nd Ave South, Suite 200, Kirkland,Washington 98033 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Phone (206)822-2577 Fax(206) 822-8758 CITY OF RENTON APR 0 2 1997 RECEIVE April 1, 1997 '. Mr. Peter Rosen Project Manager City of Renton Building/Planning/Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 RE: U.S. RENTALS, RENTON, WASHINGTON Dear Peter: As we move toward final building permit and site grading permit submittals, we would like to resolve the questions concerning the number of parking spaces required. Based upon the traffic analysis submitted and approved with the site plan/SEPA process, we would need 16 spaces for employees and 26 spaces for customers. However, as the customer need for parking is spread through the day, if we were to use one-half of that number we would be required to have 16 + 13 or 29 spaces. • Based upon code, there are various parking requirements for different uses withh#the site. These would be as follows: 1. Motor vehicle repair/service (1 per 400 sf) 6,300 sf 16 spaces required 2. Professional offices/business and retail stores (3 - 5 spaces per 1,000 sf- avg. of 4) 3,500 sf 9 spaces required 3. Warehouse and storage (1 per 1,500 sf) 800 sf 0.5 space required 4. Uncovered storage area(1 per 2,000 sf) 75,000 sf 3.7.5 spaces required As you recall,the confusion here is that many of the above categories overlap and/or do not directly apply to the U.S. Rentals operation. As an example, the parking requirements for motor vehicle repair/service anticipate the need for customer parking prior to and after service. The parking requirement for employees working in the warehouse and storage areas as well as the uncovered r Mr. Peter Rosen April 1, 1997 Page 2 storage areas would also be covered partially in the motor vehicle repair and professional offices applications. As a conservative approach, it would appear that applying the uncovered storage and warehouse and storage code requirements,which would dictate 38 parking spaces, or 9 more than our traffic analysis indicates, should adequately address parking needs for this site. We would appreciate you and your stafl's review of this analysis and to confirm that 38 parking spaces is both adequate and correctly observes code requirements. Please call should you need additional information; as we are in the process of revising the site plan for building permit submittals, we would appreciate your earliest response. Best regards, TREECE& COMPANY. /6/— Barton G. Treece, Jr., P.E. BGT:vg:rosen.401 cc: Mike Crouch,U.S.Rentals Peter Powell,Powell Development Co. 4--)j) CITY vF RENTON sell I Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator April 1, 1997 Mr. Barton Treece, Jr. Treece & Company 320 Second Avenue South, #200 Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: US Rentals LUA-97-009,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Treece: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures and Conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 235-2719. For the Environmental Review Committee, P1 cj CAA Peter Rosen Project Manager • FINAL.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer ;y CII OF RENTON ..LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 13, 1997 Mr. Barton Treece, Jr. Treece & Company 320 Second Avenue South,#200 Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: US Rentals Project No. LUA-97-009,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Treece: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures and Conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 235-2719. For the Environmental Review Committee, J ` Peter Rosen Project Manager DOCUMENT6 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer Washington State Northwest Region Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North Sid Morrison P.O.Box 330310 Seattle,WA 98133-9710 Secretary of Transportation (206)440-4000 DATE: March 7, 1997 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RFNITONI TO: Peter Rosen MAR 1 1 1997 City of Renton,Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South ECEivE Renton WA 98055 Subject: SR 167 MP 24.15 CS 1716 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance-US Rentals; • Build an Equipment Rental • Facility consisting of a 11,990 sq. ft. building, equipment storage, material storage bins & above ground fuel • tank 'bAVC(dtkit--A4711 File No.LUA-97-009,SA,ECF FROM: Robert A. Josephson,PE,Manager of Planning&Local Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North,MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 • Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project, which is located at SW 34th Street and Lind Avenue. Our response is below: We have reviewed the subject document and have no further comments. The project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. If you have any questions,please contact Don Hurter at 440-4664 or Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section VEE:vee • File Name i On the 1(1 ' day of " @aortiCI,.kti , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United States,.a sealed envelope containing documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing A e M• Ortltak. sacl % to.1r —freeze. `Treece evui Assoct '04)L4011 Arens6e 3A►vev%%\t)et3 liwettmeott (Signature of Sender) pa.14,14, tIttcre- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that -n d,t,, rr. signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act fdr the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: . 20, j qqI Nofary Public' and for the State of Won 1 .• • /J ti "� • ' Notary (Print) tYZ�4-2i ('y a �`j rv1 ch e(.� VT • U p M- ' • ^ 1. My appointment expires: Co- 9 9 1H , wti®��L. *frPrsjee tgbl8r,e: t s KW% • Frojc Number: • 001 / . ot NOTARY.DOC 'REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION REPORT DATE: February 18, 1997 Project Name: U.S. Rentals Applicant: U.S. Rentals Owner: Powell-Orilla Associates File Number: LUA-097-009, SA, ECF Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Description: Proposal to build an equipment rental facility; consisting of a 11,990 square foot metal building, equipment storage areas (secured), landscape material storage bins, and an aboveground fuel tank. The site would be improved with street frontage landscaping, drainage improvements and perimeter fencing. 24 parking stalls are proposed for customer parking, located in the northwest corner of the site. The applicant proposes a driveway access off SW 34th Street and two driveway cuts off Lind Avenue. Project Location: Lind Avenue and SW 34th Street Exist. Bldg. Area SF: NA -Vacant site Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: 11,990 s.f. Site Area: 181,732 s.f. Total Building Area SF: 11,990 s.f. -- --4.172-acres - .-- - - - - • 4 It— I j i MS. RENTALS / , SW.':8pJTBA; ;4J_1 77--i . Wul I 4 3 i� -� ay I I----i H .1);ii p 1 , ii--, . I H .I �•-`•& FBI WLLEY M� Project Location Map ,� [II / CI . ' SITERCDOC S.W.418T$T. Cityof Renton P/B/PW Department Envii , , ental Review Committee Staff Report P P U.S. RENTALS LUA-97-009, SA, ECF REPORT OF FEBRUARY 18, 1997 Page 2 of 12 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND Proposal to build an equipment rental facility; consisting of an 11,990 square foot metal building, equipment storage areas (secured with fencing), landscape material storage bins, and a 6,000 • gallon aboveground fuel tank. The site would be improved with street frontage landscaping, drainage improvements and perimeter fencing. The building would include 3,500 square feet in retail/office area, 6,300 square feet as shop bays for equipment maintenance, a 1,390 square foot covered wash rack, and 800 square feet of mezzanine storage. The building would have a maximum height of 21 feet. The building is oriented along a north/south axis and the central ridge of the roof would run longitudinally with the long axis of the building. The proposed stormwater system includes bioswales along the east and west property lines with a stormwater detention area proposed along the southerly portion of the site. 24 parking stalls are proposed for customer parking, located in the northwest corner of the site. The applicant proposes a driveway access off SW 34th Street and two driveway cuts off Lind Avenue. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In accordance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1) Earth Impacts The site is basically flat with a maximum slope of 1%. The applicant projects that approximately 9,500 cubic yards of fill material would be imported to the site from local borrow pits. The proposed development would clear the site of existing vegetation. Erosion could occur during the construction phase of the project. Potential erosion impacts would be mitigated by City Codes which require the applicant to provide a Construction Mitigation Plan and a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) prior to the issuance of a Construction Permit. Mitigation Measures No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus NA 2) Air Impacts Impacts to air quality can be anticipated during construction and after occupancy of the proposed project. Impacts during construction would include increased levels of airborne particulates (especially dust)from disturbance of exposed soils. Construction impacts would be short term in nature and would be mitigated through best management practices of the required TESCP and with the Construction Mitigation Plan. Emissions from construction equipment exhaust would have a minor impact on local air quality. Exhaust from construction vehicles is regulated by State and City SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Env rental Review Committee Staff Report U.S. RENTALS LUA-97-009, SA, ECF REPORT OF FEBRUARY 18, 1997 Page 3 of 12 Codes. After construction the impacts would be associated primarily with vehicle exhaust from customer and employee traffic. Vehicle emissions are regulated by the State of Washington. Mitigation Measures No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus NA 3) Water Impacts There are no wetlands or surface water on the site. A field investigation was conducted by B-12 Associates (report of December 5, 1996) using methodology of the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual 1987. The report concludes that there are no jurisdictional wetlands present on the site. The project site is outside the 100-year floodplain. The proposal would result in impervious surface coverage of approximately 67% of the site area. The storm drainage system consists of sheet flow away from the building to bioswales along the east and west property lines, and then to a detention basin and water quality facility in the south portion of the site. Stormwater quality treatment and detention will be required to meet City adopted sections of the King County Surface Water Manual. Mitigation Measures No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus NA 4) Fire Protection Impacts The proposal would add new construction to the City which would potentially impact the City's Fire Department. A Fire Mitigation Fee applies to all new construction. The fee has been estimated at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. For the proposed development the fee is tentatively estimated at$6,234.80 (11,990 square feet X$0.52 = $6,234.80). The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable at the time that Building Permits are issued. Mitigation Measures The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $6,234.80. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Policy Nexus Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting Ordinance, SEPA Ordinance. 5) Transportation Impacts Access to the project is proposed via a driveway off SW 34th Street and two driveway cuts are proposed off Lind Avenue. City transportation planning staff has recommended that the northerly driveway along Lind Avenue should be eliminated in order to minimize the number of driveway cuts off Lind Avenue which is classified as an arterial. This issue will be evaluated in the site plan approval for the project. The proposal would result in an increase in traffic trips and therefore would be subject to the City's Transportation Mitigation Fee. A traffic study prepared by the Transpo Group estimates 84 average daily trips for the project. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is calculated to be $75 per each average daily trip attributable to the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at $6,300.00 (84 trips x$75= $6,300.00). The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan which describes the hauling and transportation routes to the site and states that construction would be performed between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. The applicant estimates approximately 9,500 cubic yards of fill would be imported to the site. This would result in about 950 truck trips to the site. Construction- related truck traffic could impact traffic flows if occurring during AM or PM peak traffic flows. This truck traffic should be limited to off-peak hours. Mitigation Measures The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at$6,300.00 (84 trips x$75 = $6,300.00). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Envir .,ental Review Committee Staff Report U.S. RENTALS L UA-97-009, SA, ECF REPORT OF FEBRUARY 18, 1997 Page 4 of 12 The Construction Mitigation Plan shall be revised to include a traffic control plan and shall restrict haul hours to between 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. The revised Construction Mitigation Plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance, Transportation Mitigation Fee Ordinance 6) Land and Shoreline Use Impacts The subject site is zoned Heavy Industrial (IH) and the proposal is allowed as a primary permitted use in the IH zone. Therefore, the proposed use of the site is consistent with adopted zoning and the Comprehensive Plan. There are no land use impacts anticipated to result with the proposal. Mitigation Measures No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus NA B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. X Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. Period. C. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at$6,234.80. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at$6,300.00 (84 trips x$75= $6,300.00. This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. 3. The Construction Mitigation Plan shall be revised to include a traffic control plan and shall restrict haul hours to between 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. The revised Construction Mitigation Plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Env _____rental Review Committee Staff Report U.S. RENTALS LUA-97-009, SA, ECF REPORT OF FEBRUARY 18, 1997 Page 5 of 12 Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. PLAN REVIEW Wastewater(Sewer) 1. Utility Development Fee for connection to the sewer is$0.078 per gross square feet of the site, but not less than $585. 2. If the project produces fats, oils, or grease an appropriate removal system will be required. 3. If a fire sprinkler system is installed then floor drains will have to be connected to the sewer system. 4. Minimum side sewer size is 6 inches with a minimum slope of 2%. Storm Drainage (Surface Water) 1. A final storm drainage analysis report is required. Provide the following information: Ratio of proposed water surface area to required water surface area. Ratio of proposed storage volume to required storage volume. 2. Storm utility system development connection charge is$0.129 per site gross square feet, but not less than $385. 3. Show topography of entire site and minimum of 30 feet outside property area. show all existing adjacent utilities. 4. Construction drawing size is 22 x 34 and to 20 scale. 5. Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plan required. 6. Provide both vertical and horizontal profiles. 7. Floor elevation needs to shown on the plans. 8. Storm drainage existing stub crossing Lind Ave. SW needs to be confirmed in the field and indicated on the construction plans and "field confirmed." Water 1. The water system development connection charge is$0.113 per gross area of the site, but not less than $850. 2. Fifteen (15)foot utility easement required around the water meters. 3. A looped water system is required for fire flow requirement over 2,500 gpm. Estimated required fire flow is 2,000 gpm. Three fire hydrants required. FIRE 1. The preliminary required fire flow is 3000 gpm. Three fire hydrants are required, one is required to be within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the building. A looped fire main is required by city ordinance if the fire flow is over 2,500 gpm. 2. Separate plans and permits are required to be submitted to the Fire Department for the installation of aboveground fuel tanks. 3. The owner shall submit a complete hazardous material inventory statement with the building permit application. 4. Any welding operations shall be in compliance with Article 49 of the Uniform Fire Code. 5. If total building square footage exceeds 12,000 square feet, including covers/canopies attached o the building, then the entire building shall be sprinklered. A separate permit is required through the Fire Department. PARKS 1. Property owner is to maintain landscape areas within the street right-of-way. SITERC.DOC City df Renton P/B/PW Department Envir-_____antal Review Committee Staff Report U.S. RENTALS LUA-97-009, SA, ECF REPORT OF FEBRUARY 18, 1997 Page 6 of 12 AIRPORT 1. Issuance of building permit and acceptance constitute a compatible use. 2. Located just west of centerline. Zoning code prohibitions on light glare apply at this site. POLICE 6.2 police calls for service estimated annually, based on the size of the building. this area of Renton reports the highest number of commercial burglaries and thefts from construction sites. Recommend that the applicant fence in the lot with security fencing while the site is under construction, and use security lighting as well. Tools will need to have the model and serial numbers recorded,to aid in recovery if they are stolen. If a construction site trailer is used as an office, it will need heavy duty dead-bolt locks and auxiliary locks, plus metal bars over any windows, to help prevent entry by a thief. The building itself will also need heavy duty dead-bolt locks on all exterior doors, and security lighting around the building and in the parking lot. An alarm system is also highly recommended; also in the fenced in storage area. Every business in Renton that has a fenced in storage area has been broken into and has had vehicles vandalized and stolen from. This area will need extensive lighting, and I also recommend that the fenced portion have barbed- wire across the top (to help prevent burglars from jumping the fence). PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT & DECISION A. Type of Land Use Action x Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. 1, Preliminary Site Plan (Received February 5, 1997). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. 2, Building Floor Plan (Received February 5, 1997). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. 3, Exterior Elevations (Received February 5, 1997). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. 4, Preliminary Storm Drainage, Water, Sanitary Sewer and Grading Plan (Received January 20, 1997). Exhibit No. 6: Drawing No. 5, Preliminary Landscape Plan (Received January 20, 1997). Exhibit No. 7: Drawing No. 6, Neighborhood Detail Map (Received January 20, 1997). SITERC.DOC ii City of Renton P/B/PW Department Envi._....rental Review Committee Staff Report U.S. RENTALS LUA-97-009, SA, ECF REPORT OF FEBRUARY 18, 1997 Page 7 of 12 C. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-31- 33(D) of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: A. CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS AND POLICIES The Comprehensive Plan designation for the project site is Employment Area-Valley (EAV). One of the objectives of the EAV designation is to provide for a mix of employment-based uses, including commercial, office and industrial development to support the economic development of the City of Renton. (Objective LU-EE.a) The proposal is consistent with the EAV designation as it is considered an industrial use although it has a commercial/service component in terms of its customer base. The following adopted policies generally support the proposal: Policy LU-212.1 Develop the Renton Valley and the Black River Valley areas as a place for a range and variety of commercial, office, and industrial uses. Policy LU-212.2 Compatible and related land uses should be encouraged to locate in proximity to one another. Policy LU-212.8 Recognize viable existing and new industrial uses in the Valley, while promoting the gradual transition of uses on sites with good access and visibility to more intensive commercial and office use. The proposal is an industrial use in that a large part of the site would be devoted to storage of heavy equipment. However, the proposal is also a commercial service use providing equipment rentals to contractors and homeowners. This combination of uses is consistent with the variety of land uses and the new industrial uses encouraged in the EAV designation. Policy LU-212.19 Street trees and landscaping should be required for new development within the Valley to provide an attractive streetscape in areas subjected to a transition of land uses. The proposal includes a well-planted landscape frontage along SW 34th Street and Lind Avenue. B. CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS;, The project site is designated Heavy Industrial (IH) on the City zoning map. Rental facilities for heavy equipment and construction equipment are allowed as a primary permitted land use in the IH zone. There is no building height limit or maximum lot coverage standard in the IH zone. Setbacks The proposed building is setback 150 feet from Lind Avenue and 95 feet from SW 34th Street which complies with the required 15 foot minimum setback along minor arterial streets. Lind Avenue and SW 34th Street are classified as minor arterials on the City's Six Year Street Plan. The applicant is proposing a 20 foot wide landscape strip along Lind Avenue, including a 10 foot wide bed of ornamental plantings and a 10 foot wide bioswale. Along SW 34th Street, the site plan indicates a 10 foot wide on- site landscape strip. The code requires that a minimum 15 foot landscaped setback. The applicant should either change the site plan to provide a 15 foot wide landscape strip along SW 34th Street or apply for variance approval from the code requirement. Special Setback Requirement The subject property is located within and entirely surrounded by the Employment Area - Valley (EAV) Comprehensive Plan designation. The IH zone includes a "special setback standard" where an IH lot is adjacent to a lot designated for commercial, office, or public, quasi-public use on the City Comprehensive Plan. The special setback standard requires a 20 foot building setback, to include a 5 foot wide landscape strip and a solid 6 foot high barrier along the property line. The site plan includes a landscape strip and a wrought iron and masonry fence along the street frontages of Lind Avenue and SW 34th Street. In order to meet the code provision, the applicant will need to revise the fence to provide 6 SITERC.DOC Cityof Renton P/B/PW Departmenl Envffw,imental Review Committee Staff Report , U.S. RENTALS LUA-97-009, SA, ECF REPORT OF FEBRUARY 18, 1997 Page 8 of 12 foot high solid barrier along the street frontages. The applicant may also apply for variance approval from the code requirement. Landscaping In the Green River Valley, an additional 2% of the gross site area is required to be provided in natural landscaping, per the Soil Conservation Service Environmental Mitigation Agreement. This requirement would be equal to approximately 3,635 square feet for the subject site (181,732 s.f. x .02). The applicant has not indicated a landscape area on the site to comply with this requirement. The code states that the natural landscape area should be aggregated on one portion of the site and where possible should be located contiguous to natural landscaping on adjacent properties. The natural landscape area provided on the Farwest Steel site is adjacent to the east property boundary of the subject site. The applicant is proposing a bioswale along the east portion of the site. It would be appropriate and staff encourages incorporating the natural landscape area plantings into the bioswale area. The applicant should designate the required area on the landscape plan in order to satisfy the natural landscape standard. Parking The proposed site plan includes 24 customer and employee parking stalls. It is difficult to ascertain whether the proposal meets requirements of the parking code based on the site plan submittal. The Parking and Loading Ordinance sets standards for parking requirements based on the type of uses proposed. In the case where two or more uses are proposed in the same building or on a site, the Ordinance requires parking facilities to provide the sum for the various uses calculated separately. The proposal includes a building with areas for motor equipment maintenance, office/retail sales, mezzanine storage, and a wash rack, as well as a large site area devoted to equipment storage. The site plan should be revised to include the square foot area of the different proposed uses on the site and demonstrate compliance with the applicable parking requirements. Deviations from minimum or maximum parking requirements may be requested in writing to the Planning/Building/Public Works Department. Parking requirements are listed below: Motor vehicle repair/service- 1 parking space/400 s.f. Professional Offices/Business- 3 parking spaces/ 1,000 s.f. minimum, 4.5 parking spaces/1,000 s.f. maximum Retail stores, personal service shops 4 parking spaces/ 1,000 s.f. minimum, 5 parking spaces/ 1,000 s.f. maximum Warehouse and storage 1 parking space/ 1,500 s.f. Uncovered storage area 1 parking space/2,000 s.f. Required parking stall dimensions are 20 feet in length and a 9 foot width. Compact parking stalls are 16 feet in length and 8.5 feet in width. Compact parking spaces may not account for more than 40% of designated employee parking or 30% of all other parking. Aisle widths of 24 feet are required for 90 degree head-in parking. Parking lot dimensions should be shown on a revised site plan. The code requires that all outdoor storage areas be screened by a fence or landscaping. In addition to the proposed wrought iron/masonry fencing proposed along the street frontages, the applicant is proposing a chainlink fence along the south and east property boundary. The proposed fencing is sufficient to provide screening of the storage areas. C. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USES; The proposal is generally compatible with other existing, surrounding uses and the types of uses anticipated in the vicinity of the site. No excessive generation of nuisance (noise, odor, dust) is anticipated to occur. The visual impact of large outdoor equipment storage yards would be effectively mitigated by the required screening and the perimeter landscaping proposed. The subject site abuts the Farwest Steel Distribution Center to the east and a 30 foot wide railroad easement for the Burlington Northern railroad tracks effectively buffers the properties. The proposal does not include a lighting plan. In order to ensure that the outdoor lighting does not result in a glare/illumination problem on adjacent properties, the applicant should indicate that the proposed lighting is directed inward on the site. SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Env,,..,,,aental Review Committee Staff Report U.S. RENTALS LUA-97-009, SA, ECF REPORT OF FEBRUARY 18, 1997 Page 9 of 12 D. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE; The proposal would not result in adverse impacts to the site. A wetland study was conducted on the site and it concluded there are no jurisdictional wetlands on the site. Stormwater treatment and detention facilities will have to be designed to meet City standards based on adopted sections of the King County Surface Water Design Manual. A trash enclosure/dumpster area is shown adjacent to the landscape material bins on the south portion of the site. The location is accessible for hauling trucks. It appears that the area is fenced and gated in accordance with City code requirements. E. CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES; The proposal would improve an undeveloped site with an equipment rental facility which complements other uses in the area. The development is expected to conserve or enhance area-wide property values. F. SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION; The applicant proposes one driveway access off SW 34th Street and two driveway cuts off Lind Avenue. City transportation planning staff has commented that northerly driveway off Lind Avenue should be eliminated because of traffic safety concerns over the number of driveway access points off Lind Avenue, which is classified as a minor arterial. However, the north driveway cut provides a more direct access connection to the office,while the south driveway would require customers to drive through the equipment yard to reach the office and customer parking. Therefore, staff recommends that the south driveway access be eliminated in order to reduce and minimize the number of driveway accesses off Lind Avenue. The north driveway is approximately 150 feet from the intersection which provides sufficient sight distance for traffic safety. Generally, vehicular circulation on the site is designed to be safe and efficient. The layout of the parking aisles and the gated equipment areas would serve to direct customers to parking by the building entry. G. PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR; The proposed building is sufficiently setback from property boundaries and other structures to allow for adequate light and air circulation. H. MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS; The proposed land use is generally consistent with existing and anticipated industrial and commercial uses in the area. It is not anticipated that the proposal would create any harmful or unhealthy conditions. I. AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE: AND The project site is adequately served by utilities and roads to accommodate the proposed land use. See the Advisory Notes section of this report for detailed information concerning utilities and public services. J. PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT. The proposed project would improve the vacant condition of the site, adding an industrial/commercial use which is compatible with uses in the vicinity. The development would likely assist in preventing the deterioration of the site and neighborhood. SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Env - ..,ental Review Committee Staff Report U.S. RENTALS L UA-97-009, SA, ECF REPORT OF FEBRUARY 18, 1997 Page 10 of 12 X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. D. Findings, Conclusions & Decision ( Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The Applicant, U.S. Rentals, has requested Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval for development of the U.S. Rentals facility. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 thru 7. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area-Valley. 5) Zoning: The Site Plan as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Heavy Industrial zoning designation. 6) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Burlington Northern Industrial Park; East: Farwest Steel Distribution Center, G.I. Joe's, Home Base; South: Vacant and West:. E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal generally complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Valley; and the Zoning designation of Heavy Industrial. SITERC.DOC City bf Renton P/B/PW Department Envi,;;,,,,iental Review Committee Staff Report U.S. RENTALS LUA-97-009, SA, ECF REPORT OF FEBRUARY 18, 1997 Page 11 of 12 F. Decision The Site Plan for U.S. Rentals, File No. LUA-97-009, SA, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape plan to provide a 15 foot wide on-site landscaped setback along SW 34th Street. The applicant may also seek variance approval from the code requirement. The revision shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall meet the provisions of the special setback requirement(Section 4-31-12.D.1.b.) A minimum 5 foot wide landscape strip and a solid 6 foot high barrier shall be required along the street frontages of Lind Avenue and SW 34th Street,where the subject property is adjacent to lots in the Employment Area-Valley Comprehensive Plan designation. The applicant may also seek variance approval from the code requirement. The revision shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 3. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to designate an area for the Green River Valley natural landscape requirement, equal to 2% of the gross site area, 3,635 square feet. Staff encourages incorporating the natural landscape area plantings into the bioswale,water quality treatment area of the site. The revision shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The site plan shall be revised to provide a parking analysis which includes the square foot area of the different proposed uses on the site and within the building. The parking analysis shall include the number of required parking spaces based upon adopted parking standards and the number of parking spaces proposed. Deviations from the minimum or maximum parking requirements may be requested in writing to the Planning/Building/Public Works Department. The revision shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. The applicant shall indicate that proposed lighting is directed inward on the site to ensure that the outdoor lighting does not result in a glare/illumination problem on adjacent properties. This shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. The site plan shall be revised to eliminate the south driveway access in order to minimize the number of driveway accesses off Lind Avenue. The revision shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: Aeo 2-07? mes C.Hanson,Zoning Administrator approval date Michael D.Katterman ,Zoning Administrator approval date SITERC.DOC City Of Renton P/B/PW Department Envir_... ental Review Committee Staff Report , U.S. RENTALS LUA-97-009, SA, ECF REPORT OF FEBRUARY 18, 1997 Page 12 of 12 TRANSMITTED this 19th day of February, 1997 to the applicant and owner: Powell-Orilla Associates 737 Market Street Kirkland,WA. 98033 U.S. Rentals 4600 Northgate Blvd., Suite 100 Sacramento, CA. 95834 Barton Treece Treece&Company 320 Second Avenue S.,#200 Kirkland,WA. 98033 TRANSMITTED this 19th day of February, 1997 to the parties of record: Doug Arensberg Arensberg Investment 3401 Lind Avenue SW Renton,WA. 98055 TRANSMITTED 19th day of February, 1997 to the following: Jim Chandler,Building Official Bob Arthur,Land Use Inspector Art Larson,Fire Marshal Neil Watts,Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney Valley Daily News Land Use Action Appeals&Requests for Reconsideration The decision on the requested Administrative Land Use Action is being made concurrently with the Environmental Determination. The administrative land use and environmental decisions will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the date of publication. An appeal of either or both decisions must be filed within the 14 day appeal period(RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or before March 11, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior meeting, may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for review by the ERC within fourteen(14)days of publication. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems proper. If an appeal is made to the Hearing Examiner, requests for reconsideration will be forwarded to that office for consideration at the same time as the appeal. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 4-8-11.B,which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 PM on March 11, 1997. Any appeal must be accompanied by a$75.00 fee and other specific requirements. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning the land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee decision, but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. SITERC.DOC • On the day of ce 6 • , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing_, _ . ERG ci ern trto.11(nA% . documents. This information was sent to: • Name Representing Department of Ecology Dick Anderson Department of Transportation KC Water Pollution Control Metro Department of Wildlife Larry Fisher Department of Fisheries David Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Sue Rumery City of Seattle I .. • Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom, Fisheries Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Rita Perstac Puget Power • (Signature of Sender) PaLiviret___ t• STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) - I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that S as A K. S.e e /z, signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act foIthe uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated:,•- : 1.eQi, O I �H1 c--11") i4 _ R R J,, Notary Publi in and for the State of 1}hington . Notary (Print) ('V14- f n? ''C AMc(1.F r . My appointment expires:u 6 - 2e .— 9 • 1 '4.+ProjtrNagie: '4t1s Project Number: NOTARY.DOC z: CITE _DF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department 7 e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator February 19, 1997 • Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section FO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on February 18, 1997: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED US RENTALS LUA-97-009,SA,ECF Proposal to build an equipment rental facility; consisting of a 11,990 square foot metal building, equipment storage areas (secured), landscape material storage bins, and an aboveground fuel tank. The site would be improved with street frontage landscaping, drainage improvements and perimeter fencing. Twenty-four(24) parking stalls are proposed for customer parking, located in the northwest corner of the site. The applicant proposes a driveway access off SW 34th Street and two driveway cuts off Lind Avenue. The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal period will end at 5:00 PM on March 11, 1997. Following the end of the comment and appeal period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a re-evaluation. Appeal procedures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550.. lif you have questions, please call me at (206) 235-2719. For the Environmental Review Committee, t p Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: King County Water Pollution Control Division, Metro Department of Wildlife Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Sue Rumery, City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Rita Perstac, Puget Power AGNCYLTR.DOC\ 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 62)This paper contains 50%recycled material.20%oast consumer :;._.�.. CITY OF RENTON ,.1 Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator February 19, 1997 Mr. Barton Treece, Jr. Treece& Company 320 Second Avenue South,#200 Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: US Rentals Project No. LUA-97-009,SA,ECF i Dear Mr. Treece: This letter is' written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on February 18, 1,997, issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with conditions. See enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required 15 day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals (including the applicant) who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The required 14 day appeal period will run concurrently with the comment period. The comment/appeal period will end at 5:00 PM on March 11, 1997. Following the end of the comment and appeal period, the City will finalize its Determination, unless comments received require a re-evaluation. WAC 197-11-660 states that the responsibility for implementation measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of the imposed action. Since an environmental impact statement has not been prepared for this project, any mitigation measure established by the ERC not directly attributable to an identified adverse impact is deemed to be voluntarily accepted by the applicant. Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g., the Public Works Division) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended for this project, if you have specific questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. Alppeal procedures and mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. . IfIyou have any,questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (206) 235-2719. • For the Environmental Review Committee, Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Powell-Orilla Associates/Owners Mr. Doug Arensberg Enclosure DNSMLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-009,SA,ECF APPLICANT: US Rentals PROJECT NAME: US Rentals DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to build an equipment rental facility; consisting of a 11,990 square foot metal building, equipment storage areas (secured), landscape material storage bins, and an aboveground fuel tank. The site would be improved with street frontage landscaping, drainage improvements and perimeter fencing. Twenty-four(24) parking stalls are proposed for customer parking, located in the northwest corner of the site. The applicant proposes a driveway access off SW 34th Street and two driveway cuts off Lind Avenue. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Lind Avenue and SW 34th Street Mitigation Measures: I 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $6,234.80. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at$6,300.00 (84 trips x$75 = • $6,300.00. This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits.: 3. The Construction Mitigation Plan shall be revised to include a traffic control plan and shall restrict haul hours to between 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. The revised Construction Mitigation Plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. . The Site Plan for U.S. Rentals, File No. LUA-97-009, SA, ECF, is approved subject to the ti following conditions. CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape plan to provide a 15 foot wide on-site landscaped setback along SW 34th Street. The applicant may also seek variance approval from the code requirement. The revision shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall meet the provisions of the special setback requirement (Section 4-31-12.D.1.b.) A minimum 5 foot wide landscape strip and a solid 6 foot high barrier shall be required along the 11 street frontages of Lind Avenue and SW 34th Street,where the subject property is adjacent to lots in the Employment Area-Valley Comprehensive Plan designation. The applicant may also seekI' variance approval from the code requirement. The revision shall be subject to the approval of the 1{� Development Services Division, prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. US Rentals LUA-97-009,SA,ECF Mitigation Measures and Conditions Page-2- 3. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to designate an area for the Green River Valley natural landscape requirement, equal to 2% of the gross site area, 3,635 square feet. Staff encourages incorporating the natural landscape area plantings into the bioswale, water quality treatment area of the site. The revision shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. . 4. The site plan shall be revised to provide a parking analysis which includes the square foot area of the different proposed uses on the site and within the building. The parking analysis shall include the number of required parking spaces based upon adopted parking standards and the number of parking spaces proposed. Deviations from the minimum or maximum parking requirements may be requested in writing to the Planning/Building/Public Works Department. The revision shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. The applicant shall indicate that proposed lighting is directed inward on the site to ensure that the outdoor lighting does not result in a glare/illumination problem on adjacent properties. This shall be• subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. The site plan shall be revised to eliminate the south driveway access in order to minimize the number of driveway accesses off Lind Avenue. The revision shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-009,SA,ECF APPLICANT: US Rentals PROJECT NAME: US Rentals DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to build an equipment rental facility; consisting of a 11,990 square foot metal building, equipment storage areas (secured), landscape material storage bins, and an aboveground fuel tank. The site would be improved with street frontage landscaping, drainage improvements and perimeter fencing. Twenty-four(24) parking stalls are proposed for customer parking, located in the northwest corner of the site. The applicant proposes a driveway access off SW 34th Street and two driveway cuts off Lind Avenue. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Lind Avenue and SW 34th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. PLAN REVIEW • Wastewater.(Sewer) 1. Utility Development Fee for connection to the sewer is$0.078 per gross square feet of the site, but not less than $585. a 2. If the project produces fats, oils, or grease an appropriate removal system will be required. 3. If a fire sprinkler system is installed then floor drains will have to be connected to the sewer system. 4. Minimum side sewer size is 6 inches with a minimum slope of 2%. I' Storm Drainage (Surface Water) 1 1. A final storm drainage analysis report is required. Provide the following information: • Ratio of proposed water surface area to required water surface area. Ratio of proposed storage volume to required storage volume. 2. Storm utility system development connection charge is $0.129 per site gross square feet, but not less than $385. 3. Show topography of entire site and minimum of 30 feet outside property area. show all existing adjacent utilities. 4. Construction drawing size is 22 x 34 and to 20 scale. . 5. Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plan required: 7 US Rentals LUA-97-009,SA,ECF Advisory Notes Page 2 6. Provide both vertical and horizontal profiles. 7. Floor elevation needs to shown on the plans. 8. Storm drainage existing stub crossing Lind Ave. SW needs to be confirmed in the field and indicated on the construction plans and "field confirmed." Water 1. The water system development connection charge is$0.113 per gross area of the site, but not less than $850. 2. Fifteen (15) foot utility easement required around the water meters. 3. A looped water system is required for fire flow requirement over 2,500 gpm. Estimated required fire flow is 3,000 gpm. Three fire hydrants required. FIRE 1. The preliminary required fire flow is 3000 gpm. Three fire hydrants are required, one is required to be within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants are,required within 300 feet of the building. A looped fire main is required by city ordinance if the fire flow is over 2,500 gpm. 2. Separate plans and permits are required to be submitted to the Fire„Department for the installation of aboveground fuel tanks. 3. The owner shall submit a complete hazardous material inventory statement with the building permit application. 4. Any welding operations shall be in compliance with Article 49 of the Uniform Fire Code. 5. If total building square footage exceeds 12,000 square feet, including covers/canopies attached o the building, then the entire building shall be sprinklered. A separate.perinit is required through the Fire Department. PARKS 1. Property owner is to maintain landscape areas within the street right-of-way. AIRPORT 1. Issuance of building permit and acceptance constitute a compatible use. 2. Located just west of centerline. Zoning code prohibitions on light glare apply at this site. POLICE 6.2 police calls for service estimated annually, based on the size of the building. this area of Renton reports the highest number of commercial burglaries and thefts from construction sites. Recommend that the applicant fence in the lot with security fencing while the site is under construction, and use security lighting as well. Tools will need to have the model and serial numbers recorded, to aid in recovery if they are stolen. If a construction site trailer is used as an office, it will need heavy duty dead- bolt locks and auxiliary locks, plus metal bars over any windows, to help prevent entry by a thief. The building itself will also need heavy duty dead-bolt locks on all exterior doors, and security lighting around the building and in the parking lot. An alarm system is also highly recommended; also in the fenced in storage area. Every business in Renton that has a fenced in storage area has been broken into and has had vehicles vandalized and stolen from. This area will need extensive lighting, and I also recommend that the fenced portion have barbed-wire across the top (to help prevent burglars from jumping the fence. &. . , i\JI .rt-TICE , • . . , . I . . . . . . . . , ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: US RENTALS • • PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-009,SA,ECF Proposal to build an equipment rental facility;consisting of a 11,990 square foot metal building. - equipment storage areas(secured),landscape material storage bins,and an aboveground fuel tank The . site would be Improved with street frontage landscaping,drainage improvements end perimeter fencing. Twenty-four(24)parking stalls are proposed for customer parking,located in the northwest comer of the site. The applicant proposes a driveway access off SW 34th Street and two driveway cuts off Lind Avenue.Location:Und Avenue end SW 341h Street. � I • THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED . THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE . ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. . ® YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON MARCH 11,1997 OR APPEAL - j THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM.MARCH 11,1997.THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS • WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. • Mill 6I ., • :m .1IU !ls r ill • • . IPA P._'_'____E,)?:zi_J .. . ii,- / ! r_i___,,,, 1 p'Y�� . . , , #I'J.l,,,,,„ • . ...a... i ,_ /111-1 rif . , . • I FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. • DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION • ' Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper Tile Identification.,• .• • - CERTIFICATION • I, SC,i/I (JCL-LSGY1 • hereby certify that 3 copies.of the above document were posted-by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . f bru.a- 25, l i'ii Signed: Sly l'lal1� . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) . • ' • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that S Ji\J b 1�}GK,onl•:., signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free andvol4n�a \ac'i'`tarjli�e. uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ', • :;. ,v •_;1 Dated: c /* .ill GLf,t 4f Notary P lc in and t the Stat" ,Of 'sfitinglon r-' . '' a Notary (Print) fEl�/ 2 ' �. DGf_r_Lii-2 My appointment expires: LP/' /' e NOTARY.00C i ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: US RENTALS i PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-009,SA,ECF Proposal to build an equipment rental facility; consisting of a 11,990 square foot metal building, equipment storage areas(secured),landscape material storage bins,and an aboveground fuel tank. The I site would be improved with street frontage landscaping,drainage improvements and perimeter fencing. Twenty-four(24)parking stalls are proposed for customer parking, located in the northwest corner of the site. The applicant proposes a driveway access off SW 34th Street and two driveway cuts off Lind Avenue. Location: Lind Avenue and SW 34th Street. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. _ AN'ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. , XXX YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON MARCH 11, 1997 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM,MARCH 11, 1997. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. I g 3 ' all 1 i Sw.313T g x 111 U.S. /1 RENTALS ) aw.34 tIr ' ---7 'FI1gWEST .. I i III! ii! ri • iI--1 i a ~1 Q 4 ,cr pi 3 iL . ` 1---- 1 H MLLIET N 1 J It 0 { S.W.4IST ST. 1-44-1" -- 1 ( I I !� FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT i SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION .,;; Pleae.mclude the<p.roject N MBERVhen`i ailing#or:prop'er'file:.indent fiOtiOt °:;;;>g:: '»€: CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) PPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-009,SA,ECF APPLICANT: US Rentals PROJECT NAME: US Rentals DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to build an equipment rental facility; consisting of a 11,990 square foot metal building, equipment storage areas (secured), landscape material storage bins, and an aboveground fuel tank. The site would be improved with street frontage landscaping, drainage improvements and perimeter fencing. Twenty-four (24) parking stalls are proposed for customer parking, located in the northwest corner of the site. The applicant proposes a driveway access off SW 34th Street and two driveway cuts off Lind Avenue. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Lind Avenue and SW 34th Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on March 11, 1997. Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. PUBLICATION DATE: Febraury 24, 1997 DATE OF DECISION: February 18, 1997 SIGNATURES: -2—//4/ 7 YejiZi41man, dminis rator DATE Departm nt f PI ning/Building/Public Works /e.,77 7 :m Chastain, Administrato DA E •ommunity Service Department - —/c77 _ e lyd , re hief DATE Renton Fire Department • DNSMSIG.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-009,SA,ECF APPLICANT: US Rentals PROJECT NAME: US Rentals DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to build an equipment rental facility; consisting of a 11,990 square foot metal building, equipment storage areas (secured), landscape material storage bins, and an aboveground fuel tank. The site would be improved with street frontage landscaping, drainage improvements and perimeter fencing. Twenty-four(24) parking stalls are proposed for customer parking, located in the northwest corner of the site. The applicant proposes a driveway access off SW 34th Street and two driveway cuts off Lind Avenue. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Lind Avenue and SW 34th Street Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at$6,234.80. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall_be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at$6,300.00 (84 trips x$75 = $6,300.00. This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. 3. The Construction Mitigation Plan shall be revised to include a traffic control plan and shall restrict haul hours to between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. The revised Construction Mitigation Plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. The Site Plan for U.S. Rentals, File No. LUA-97-009, SA, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape plan to provide a 15 foot wide on-site landscaped setback along SW 34th Street. The applicant may also seek variance approval from the code requirement. The revision shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall meet the provisions of the special setback requirement (Section 4-31-12.D.1.b.) A minimum 5 foot wide landscape strip and a solid 6 foot high barrier shall be required along the street frontages of Lind Avenue and SW 34th Street, where the subject property is adjacent to lots in the Employment Area-Valley Comprehensive Plan designation. The applicant may also seek variance approval from the code requirement. The revision shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. US Rentals LUA-97-009,SA,ECF Mitigation Measures and Conditions Page-2- 3. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to designate an area for the Green River Valley natural landscape requirement, equal to 2% of the gross site area, 3,635 square feet. Staff encourages incorporating the natural landscape area plantings into the bioswale, water quality treatment area of the site. The revision shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The site plan shall be revised to provide a parking analysis which includes the square foot area of the different proposed uses on the site and within the building. The parking analysis shall include the number of required parking spaces based upon adopted parking standards and the number of parking spaces proposed. Deviations from the minimum or maximum parking requirements may be requested in writing to the Planning/Building/Public Works Department. The revision shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. The applicant shall indicate that proposed lighting is directed inward on the site to ensure that the outdoor lighting does not result in a glare/illumination problem on adjacent properties. This shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. The site plan shall be revised to eliminate the south driveway access in order to minimize the number of driveway accesses off Lind Avenue. The revision shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-009,SA,ECF APPLICANT: US Rentals PROJECT NAME: US Rentals DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to build an equipment rental facility; consisting of a 11,990 square foot metal building, equipment storage areas (secured), landscape material storage bins, and an aboveground fuel tank. The site would be improved with street frontage landscaping, drainage improvements and perimeter fencing. Twenty-four(24) parking stalls are proposed for customer parking, located in the northwest corner of the site. The applicant proposes a driveway access off SW 34th Street and two driveway cuts off Lind Avenue. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Lind Avenue and SW 34th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. PLAN REVIEW Wastewater(Sewer) 1. Utility Development Fee for connection to the sewer is$0.078 per gross square feet of the site, but not less than $585. 2. If the project produces fats, oils, or grease an appropriate removal system will be required. 3. If a fire sprinkler system is installed then floor drains will have to be connected to the sewer system. 4. Minimum side sewer size is 6 inches with a minimum slope of 2%. Storm Drainage (Surface Water) 1. A final storm drainage analysis report is required. Provide the following information: Ratio of proposed water surface area to required water surface area. Ratio of proposed storage volume to required storage volume. 2. Storm utility system development connection charge is$0.129 per site gross square feet, but not less than $385. 3. Show topography of entire site and minimum of 30 feet outside property area. show all existing adjacent utilities. 4. Construction drawing size is 22 x 34 and to 20 scale. 5. Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plan required. US Rentals LUA-97-009,SA,ECF Advisory Notes Page 2 6. Provide both vertical and horizontal profiles. 7. Floor elevation needs to shown on the plans. 8. Storm drainage existing stub crossing Lind Ave. SW needs to be confirmed in the field and indicated on the construction plans and "field confirmed." Water 1. The water system development connection charge is$0.113 per gross area of the site, but not less than $850. 2. Fifteen (15) foot utility easement required around the water meters. 3. A looped water system is required for fire flow requirement over 2,500 gpm. Estimated required fire flow is 3,000 gpm. Three fire hydrants required. FIRE 1. The preliminary required fire flow is 3000 gpm. Three fire hydrants are required, one is required to be within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the building. A looped fire main is required by city ordinance if the fire flow is over 2,500 gpm. 2. Separate plans and permits are required to be submitted to the Fire Department for the installation of aboveground fuel tanks. 3. The owner shall submit a complete hazardous material inventory statement with the building permit application. 4. Any welding operations shall be in compliance with Article 49 of the Uniform Fire Code. 5. If total building square footage exceeds 12,000 square feet, including covers/canopies attached o the building, then the entire building shall be sprinklered. A separate permit is required through the Fire Department. PARKS • 1. Property owner is to maintain landscape areas within the street right-of-way. AIRPORT 1. Issuance of building permit and acceptance constitute a compatible use. 2. Located just west of centerline. Zoning code prohibitions on light glare apply at this site. POLICE 6.2 police calls for service estimated annually, based on the size of the building. this area of Renton reports the highest number of commercial burglaries and thefts from construction sites. Recommend that the applicant fence in the lot with security fencing while the site is under construction, and use security lighting as well. Tools will need to have the model and serial numbers recorded, to aid in recovery if they are stolen. If a construction site trailer is used as an office, it will need heavy duty dead- bolt locks and auxiliary locks, plus metal bars over any windows,to help prevent entry by a thief. The building itself will also need heavy duty dead-bolt locks on all exterior doors, and security lighting around the building and in the parking lot. An alarm system is also highly recommended; also in the fenced in storage area. Every business in Renton that has a fenced in storage area has been broken into and has had vehicles vandalized and stolen from. This area will need extensive lighting, and I also recommend that the fenced portion have barbed-wire across the top (to help prevent burglars from jumping the fence. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Kristina Thompson, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL • 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent,Washington 98032 a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal - newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language / NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County DETERMINATION ( Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ,ii RENTON, WASHINGTON State of Washington for King County. The Environmental Review Committee The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the South County (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- ng Journal not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers project and Mitigated for the Renton (andPP g y project under the authority of the Renton during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Municipal Code. US RENTALS Notice of Environmantal Determination LUA-97 oo9,sA,ECF Environmental review for construction of equipment rental facility. Location: Lind as published on: 2/24/97 Ave. and SW 34th St. a i The 15 day comment/14 day appeal peri- ' ods for this project will run concurrentiy and The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$33.69 end at 5:00 p.m.on March 11,1997.Appeal Legal Number VN2606 procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environ- •mental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building,Renton,Washing- ton 98055.Phone:235-2550.You should be ' Legal Cler South o y Journal ( . prepared to make specific factual objec- ; tions. Published in the South County Journal • February 24, 1997. 2606 s Subscribed and swom before me on this a-`71 y of , 19 9-7 .-_---- ------- K(:),.. ---J 0../..,r,:m• -40idAty �E� eN1. FE,.7\1e Notary Public of the State of Washington rn m ��`o...sstaN :4'5,i�,411 residing in Renton c''o i ,?c, o A R '�F�;J' 11,E King County, Washington o T y %�k= N -- - - % �� . / . P 1G _ / m 0 / r zv h OF WAS..= r' NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. US RENTALS LUA-97-009,SA,ECF Environmental review for construction of equipment rental facility. Location: Lind Ave. and SW 34th St. The 15 day comment/14 day appeal periods for this project will run concurrently and end at 5:00 p.m. on March 11, 1997. Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Publication Date: FEBRUARY 24, 1997 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot TERRA ASSOCIATES, Inc: Z ti > ` . Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology, , . �. � and Environmental Earth.Sciences. ' January 23, 1997 • Project No:T-3065-1 U.S. Rentals . c/o Mr. Bart Treece 1N!S Treece and Company 320-2nd Avenue South, Suite 200 NSS1 Kirkland,Washington 98033 JP NOG w v• P ts1 Subject: Geotechnical Report Revision. _ ow0,0V fs. o - U.S.Rentals, , SW 34th Street and Lind Avenue ' Renton,Washington Reference: 1. Geotechnical Report,Warehouse/Office.Facility,by Terra Associates,Inc.dated , - February•9, 1996 Dear Mr.Treece:, We understand that the subject site will be developed by U.S.-Rentals as;a new rental facility. The_proposed-. . construction .will differ considerably from _what we expected .:and evaluated in the referenced report. Accordingly, you have asked us to review our recommendations with respect to'the planned construction. ' A preliminary grading plan for the.project by Treece:and Company dated January 3, 1997 shows that a ; 10,600 square foot office/rental building will be situated within the central portion of the,site. With existing site grades at Elev. 16, an approximately two-foot thick fill pad will be required to construct the building to the. proposed finished floor elevation of 18.5 feet. ;We understand the building will be of metal-frame construction,that will impose relatively light foundation loads. With.the planned building, we'expect relatively low floor slab loading of approximately 150 to 200 pounds per square foot(psf). , As we discussed with you, the recommendations in our referenced report pertaining to site preparation and foundation design would.still be applicable for the.revised site development. However; .because of the reduced building loads and the type of construction planned, we do not believe it will be ,necessary to. surcharge the site to the extent or magnitude recommended for the previously :planned structure: The revision to our surcharge recommendations is to reduce the four foot surcharge fill above the finished.floor- subgrade elevation'to a-minimum of six inches. Following fill placement, monitoring for settlements should ' be completed is previously recommended:in our referenced report. 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101, Kirkland, Washington 98034 • Phone (206).82i-7777 Mr. Bart Treece _ ,, January 23, 1997 - ' We estimate that the 2.5-foot thick fill pad=will induce primary settlements of about 2-1/4 inches within the peat and clayey;silt layers underlying the,building area. Analysis"indicates that these settlements should'. . ' occur within-about six_weeks:.The time rate for these expected settlements can..be accelerated by placing • - additional',depth: of surcharge-fill. For•four feet of surcharge fill above 1.the'finished subgrade'elevation,' ' • analysis indicates that the expected settlements-would'occur within'two;to three weeks: Following- successful .completion of the preload,,,program, we estimate that:post-Construction primary settlements will;range from.1/2,to 1inch. Secondary,compression of the,peat layer beneath the building will ' continue:for several years-once.the primary settlements are complete: We estimate that over a 50 year , • period, up to 1-1/2 inches'of settlement will occur in addition to the Primary settlements..Approximately 75 ' ,percent of the secondary:settleinents will occur within the initial ten,years ofthe life Of.the structure: • Local variations in:building.loads and subsurface:'conditions,will introduce a differential'component to the above settlements.'Accordingly,,you'should expect some building movements:and cracking of the floor slabs. , • ' 'during the initial years of the life of the structure. . ' ) ' . - ' i ' ' _ If the risk,of building settlement as discussed is not acceptable to you, then we recommend.implementing the surcharge program outlined id-the referenced geotechnical report.•Other than the'modification to the building ' surcharge, all other,geo technical recommendations for design and construction remain valid." : : We trust the information presented is sufficient to meet your current needs: 'If you have any questions or' ;' ,:`, need additional information,.please call.. ' - ' . • Sincerely yours,: .' _ , , - ; TERRA ASSOCIATES,INC. w 'P , 9_6b-exA- Kevin P. Roberts,P.E. Project Engineer ,:''0 .�. , Q - , . . . � ?•. �',� Aye./ ;, Theodore J.Sch`.�', ,P.F D , Principal,Engine i.,.;� , KPR/TJS:tm .""'• 670.ti , .. - • - • Project No.,T-3065-1 ,Page No, 2 ' City enton Department of Planning/Building/F Works • IR ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION R ;t+.r. � okkiT REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Rye_ Fr, .oevcium COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 07,J 991 7 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-009,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 24, 12977 � A� ED APPLICANT: US RENTALS PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROS . PROJECT TITLE: US RENTALS WORK ORDER NO: 78181 LOCATION: Lind Avenue&SW 34th Street SATE AREA: 4.17 Acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 11,990 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action[Site Plan Approval]for a proposal to construct an 11,990 square foot metal building for an equipment rental facility. The project would include outdoor equipment storage areas(secured), landscape material storage bins, above ground fuel storage, and customer parking. Access driveways Would be located off of SW 34th Street and Lind Avenue. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS l Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Ught/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet /vo tdr- ;.t paC.TS ,Vpf B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS I C. CODE-RELATED COMMENT // tACf L Co , %1 SLe er We have revie ed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addition I information isp eded to properly assess this proposal. amue , , / 3o 9 ignatur of erector or Authorized '_•resentative Date 1EVAPP. Rev.10/93 k O'< Y O'et . 4. CITY OF RENTON ,e$,l FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU IT NO MEMORANDUM DATE: January 30, 1997 TO: Peter Rosen, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal S SUBJECT: US Rentals, Lind Avenue 8s SW 34t Street Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary required fire flow is 3000 GPM. Three fire hydrants are required, one is required to be within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the building. A looped fire main is required by city ordinance if the fire flow is over 2500 GPM. 2. A fire mitigation fee is required at $.52 a square foot of building area for a total of$6234.80. 3. Separate plans and permits are required to be submitted to the Fire Department for the installation of aboveground fuel tanks. 4. The owner shall submit a complete hazardous material inventory statement with the building permit application. 5. Any welding operations shall be in compliance with Article 49 of the ' Uniform Fire Code. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. 1-v tz,,i4ro,se... �a0� es? cQ. •a i ) Qjg v 4-1ALI-N_ tl\L ,-e_v .EA-e, tx:, \9(‘Al) s6ala (21— 3twg City enton Department of Planning/Building/F Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT. (0 e(teatsktubdtil COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 07, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-009,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 24, 1997 APPLICANT: US RENTALS PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: US RENTALS WORK ORDER NO: 78181 LOCATION: Lind Avenue&SW 34th Street SITE AREA: 4.17 Acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 11,990 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action[Site Plan Approval]for a proposal to construct an 11,990 square foot metal building for an equipment rental facility. The project would include outdoor equipment storage areas(secured), landscape material storage bins, above ground fuel storage, and customer parking. Access driveways would be located off of SW 34th Street and Lind Avenue. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing . Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation / Land/Shoreline Use Utilities /-- Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistoridCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.J r /5/77. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative iG/�� Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 U.S. RENTS EIS Review SW 34th St. &Lind Ave. SW February 4, 1997 WASTE WATER (Sewer) 1. Utility Development Fee for connection to the sewer is $0.078 per gross square feet of site, but not less then $585. 2. If the project produces fats, oils, or grease an appropriate removal system will be required. 4. If a fire sprinkler system is installed then the floor drains will have to be connected to the sewer system. 5. Minimum side sewer size is 6-inches with a minimum slope of 2%. STORM DRAINAGE: (Surface water) 1. A final storm drainage analysis report required. Provide the following information: a) Ratio of Proposed Water Surface Area to Required Water Surface Area. b) Ratio of Proposed Storage Volume to Required Storage Volume. 2. Storm utility system development connection charge is $0.129 per site gross square feet, but not less than $385. 3. Show topography of entire site and minimum of 30-feet outside property area. Show all existing adjacent utilities. 4. Construction drawing size is 22 x 34 and to 20 scale. 5. Erosion / Sedimentation Control plan required. 6. Provide both vertical and horizontal profiles. 7. Floor elevation needs to be shown on the plans. 8. Stonn drainage existing stub crossing Lind Ave. SW needs to be confirmed in the field. and Indicated on the construction plans, "field confirmed". • 97cm015 97CM015.DOC\ City enton Department of Planning/Building/f Works , ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:ilah iRev(e,4..)"' W tY COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 07, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-009,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 24, 1991!TY REyTOw APPLICANT: US RENTALS PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN n®® 7 e.t:':' yy�� N PROJECT TITLE: US RENTALS WORK ORDER NO: 78181 ° 3 1 1997 • LOCATION: Lind Avenue&SW 34th Street :, ,,�s;,Lasuv� dJ14rt� SITE AREA: 4.17 Acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 11,990 Sq.Ft. ylUN SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action[Site Plan Approval]for a proposal to construct an 11,990 square foot metal building for an equipment rental facility. The project would include outdoor equipment storage areas(secured), landscape material storage bins, above ground fuel storage, and customer parking. Access driveways would be located off of SW 34th Street and Lind Avenue. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More 'Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air � / Aesthetics 'Water I Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet e ' 1 13 P Lr-= ci Y C /•c. b tie l B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS �ot U¢/�I,• � ( e �� � r2 cr,_ Q t� c cd / C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS A loD p cct:e Gy. "es-' c) f ) c(0(-Li e Irk e- -z O I p j 7E/ z`_d f'4,/ ire P.'1.9 .(.--1„ci 5 _ 47 C` ro 1--- , h ✓ l-7 cl r t<S v t,Z i E' cL Vie have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas Where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. I 4,e/Y777 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC j' Rev.10193 City ;enton Department of Planning/Building/f ;Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:IMAesfeit ml COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 07,'1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-009,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 24, 1997 APPLICANT: US RENTALS PROJECT MANAGER: PETER RODE RENTON •PROJECT TITLE: US RENTALS WORK ORDER NO: 78181 ^-aVED LOCATION: Lind Avenue&SW 34th Street FEB 0 4:1Q97 SITE AREA 4.17 Acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 11,990 Sq.Ft. 110 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action[Site Plan Approval]for a pral to construct an 11,990 square foot metal building for an equipment rental facility. The project would include outdoor equipment storage areas(secured), landscape material storage bins, above ground fuel storage, and customer parking. Access driveways would be located off of SW 34th Street and Lind Avenue. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glam Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet S E e- ' e 5 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed-o properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Represent ive Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 U.S. RENTALS Lind Ave. SW& SW 34th St. EIS Review February 4, 1997 TRANSPORTATION: 1. The transportation mitigation fee is $6300. 2. The proposed most northerly driveway on Lind Ave. SW is to be deleted for the following reason: Lind Ave. SW is classified as an arterial with relatively higher speeds. Due to higher speeds of an arterial, the addition of a restrictor to the traffic flow such as a driveway and the addition of a traffic conflict point due to turning movements on the arterial are reasons per AASHTO (American Association of State Highway& Transportation Officials) and we to keep the number of driveways to minimum on arterials. This is in the interest of safety to the traveling public and in good Engineering practice. 97cm014 I � CS Y + maiR i ..iry��fe'.ciaxti' •..cwwo-•. /vi:uax?aw^rASrrtiwnroSewii..a}jt„ea�nr:mrnccw+$o:Ta'Fa.y.:.,.".•:�' • •MGA•j�'Y 7000... Project Name t • . Ze vi'tc. I Project Address G.i vitA Alit e S (4) ft 5 L() 31- 'l 5-t , Contact Person har to0 l vee_CC c/0 1 ✓ecce 4 Co• Address 320 Z Ave S. , ZOO if ivk/6116( 5 3 Phone Number (zD .) - gZ Z— 2 577 Permit Number LOA 0Uq Project Description Equ► amewl Rei.tet1 Foci 1, 7 — i j, qro 4- L J�(G • Land Use Type: , Method of Calculation: ❑ Residential 0 ITE Trip Generation Manual �Retail jSr Traffic Study ❑ Non-retail 0 Other Calculation: � . f 1c s1uv,eci prep Vey( by tic.e IVuv>)p o r-/oict0 fivzva G(a�l� t 'ys fo oftve — trips At 75 7 try (0) H H75 ) _ $ 6300, • Transportation Mitigation Fee: 1.6 3Do - 0/ Calculated by: / /-e OU2 Date: lk 4 k7 Account Number: Date of Payment • 61,+49.17'LIND•'AVEN• •.. `'. ' �.. i'' 0+00 W:.34.ST•STIEET" ` • ",.-..r z.. .... • . . • ' . 61+49.17 . I -- ;• ` li • . ---- -7--I— _-.. PROPOSED SIGN, SEE . ..._..._ F ',i' � ;;. CONNECT TO F ARCH. ShTE PLAN.• . �,•%''IE = 16.14 ' ui `r: < .. ,• . _ < �..., EXIST STUB • i I • G. 0'00' • . t'.i.�•-- v • j, j �`\ i ; ; ; ..... i. • ; • • i i 1.00% 0/ , . 1 4 F I. 3 0 WA i , L E3 S LE r - I :'m-�iG-.:6 BOTTOM AREA I. { .i . ,8'. ,. ,fr.;-:'; 1 .. • I .8 D ! ! IE •15.87 'ij i ' ..I, . • . . id • •• • , J !,. 'r _ • 46 LF'8" SD 00.50% ' •. il , I , 1 • I•,. I A R•.1C. . ' • I j ; o R1'0:00;: �► II ,. . ,i.ri.4 c..7•br,-,S i r '.:;,•: COt4NFCT TO; ; �;; •4o;�'(:. { .t,:- ; i ; EXIST JSTUB ; ;! • 15 LF ®•.1.00% E j ' IE.' 00f •• oi W I. f ' 1 59-'-iOQ' I . ' ,'f • . nn nn nn i.�.;. .._. :.' 4 cr.�.__.."' L• , `' `j''='' PROPOSED • .. • ' 'U. t 1• 2� ' ` ' 1 •OIL & GRIT . , li ( ; 1 i i. , F-X•_._.- ,........._,..,........._,SEPARATOR' • • ^j 1 it + i.. .�,,,', ..: � � p • ; E U EPM �111I� Lr1 SD MN • EN'T•--i; "'f.t.= ..:<,V•, .,t21i!, .,•. s';y`'t'`T,.,t;t:fiti' ::1''`,<<4-1',#-��M?.r. !.5,,1 ��. n,ar;, x. ,,,�• `�.ry=+i .t:. ''!,q,,i .a• ..v .t;e..�:„a ,n.•i.•' .,: �. + :.. �t•' 1. ,5 G..,;R!! ice:. 7. •;:, •�" : ,� ,t �. .�'•1 ' 11 :j,.,,ih'..• ..T{, .. „Ir ' r S Nil- a ' I :' ''i r'. ? :-: 1. . .. •• i' .1• :. �' : -�•. grit ri' : . 1a� • •...... I 1 ..i 11 •, . •. , t,7u� _.: ;:'..,,_ . .. .. ' . ' • ti , 'r1 f t I 'r - I; •! ••y1 1 i 11 l ifl':?!'' L.`_i't1 y . t I. •A • 1 • i • I • 1.15% L o i 1: 5d --00 [ • • 1. • r ! 1 . ?: 209 LF"•.12" SD 00.53% • . 11 i -� A '. ' 1 I : ' 1.1:1 . •, . N208•:L BIOSWALE 0020% I416 SF' :OTTOM'AREA W , , •CONC.•I • 1: 1 ; ' "25.00 I •• • • Q NEW.6' WIDE•CONCRETE i r 43 .LF ®:0.50% (n • ' SIDEWALK. ALONG FRONTAGE. , .. (n•W Z I aa; ¢ - 57 00 •' d :CD! Q i • j Q ' ) ' f k'` i 5' , 0:50�. .1, .i• • 1- ' 1S0U s •,i it ,, 1 • - . • i , I V'• . 10.50 •1 • • 1� ... 10.50•—, I• •' '_I•......�- a':1: ' ' ,.• -1 : ' IE =`15.00', IE=13.50 1 1 • �. .-.tq-,:ti i '0i 1:;' ,i.P. ':; .. +sue • . ;. ;t..,,,_ i 1 • _ • !, , COMBINATION �f t , ;c •:6 •. p ,i.. .! T. , DE ENT10N/WA?TER. , r •r.' • I- . r. i • i X QUALITY PONb� City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Pi „ Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: . yf 3 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 07, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-009,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 24, 1997 APPLICANT: US RENTALS PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: US RENTALS 'WORK ORDER NO: 78181 LOCATION: Lind Avenue&SW 34th Street • SITE AREA 4.17 Acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 11,990 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action[Site Plan Approval]for a proposal to construct an 11,990 square foot metal building for an equipment rental facility. The project would include outdoor equipment storage areas(secured), landscape material storage bins, above ground fuel storage, and customer parking. Access driveways would be located off of SW 34th Street and Lind Avenue. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics 1 Water Light/Glare 'Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services 'Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 1 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet a-(.c4A- e B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS c� �p-z�yOGr da C./ODERELA TED COMM/EN�TS �7G�/Y77 L .4)."67.: : 1 I � We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in hich we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess{his proposal. I}' A 9/ /- i nature of Director or Authorized Representative �(te DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 Afff City_. _snton Department of Planning/Building/P_ Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Axrpar---r COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 07, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-009,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 24, 1997 APPLICANT: US RENTALS PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: US RENTALS WORK ORDER NO: 78181 LOCATION: Lind Avenue&SW 34th Street SITE AREA: 4.17 Acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 11,990 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action[Site Plan Approval]for a proposal to construct an 11,990 square foot metal building for an equipment rental facility. The project would include outdoor equipment storage areas(secured), landscape material storage bins, above ground fuel storage, and customer parking. Access driveways would be located off of SW 34th Street and Lind Avenue. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Infonnation ! impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services 1 Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation 1 Airport Environment 10,000 Feet .e M , e 14,000 Feet \a.6 I 1 I B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 4kezip t,t c L Qsiee•P"'f 0 csukt Lti-IX G- C®w:t U . . i C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ny0-44 il d}enta.t AAA. iA4A_,upsda. 04 evireALL'ab. 364.1.;49 to&s. 11 I Ilfe have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a••uional informati s needed to properly assess this proposal. I . •I � / , �' 3 30 (9'97 i V ! ignatur f Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP••• Rev.10r93 1 R9L3JU re = -"LEI ammo.- 7 _c , — _=v==_-.=_—r_- ==_==__ -__- _- - •Q�.: .LA, t-e " Na.�. es„ ::::::::::::__--m::::,..f_____-.1.-m:mmEE::.:::_.:-:::::_ ::._. ._,,, ._, . ._ 114.. ., ... , ,_.:3:-_..::::,::_:::_::_:-,::_:::::::::::::„.,„_:___::::::::::___:::::::::::::::::::::„..::::::::::::::::::::__:::__:_:_x_ ,, ,., 7,1 41 D 0{1,1 0!OS ------ --_E:_ErKEE:E7:::::§37:-:::::::::::Efj:Kta.::::::':::::_•:.3.:-E:E:11.12.-_,K;E:Ef-57::::::::::::::E:E:E::::::_-7.5_:::::3.5.t • lit'` . 3 . •.[—no nH ,....____ -_-_,_,_:_:_:_,_,_,_,w-...:_,_:_:__ -_:_:_:_:_:_:„..-_,_:_:_:_x_,_,_ _:: .-._:_:_:_,_ , II-4 1 CU riv-1191% RC . ._ ro-). . I0_ P JIUU1- _ __ - _ ______ _ _ ______ : .1 ity IP , .1 1 i •, ,Ha- rs._ ' --. ` fht...;. :3-7(\c•\c,...._ 44-.7-7.:::::::_ --:_ "::-:::::::::-:::-::::::::::_:_::::::::::::-0_ ', ris- rIE i 1 D 1 ,la,��- i giFfiq* ,Q, Q(C �aO { ,"------:-- 3 e ' , _=_==== F, NORM ow am...-__ f p i p __-_ -7, --'1.i_f I 8,,,.. 4,,4 . �Sem *„...NB ctii iqr c t. "lit uc —■ °' RI LI a C C ,� wlL^ � \1 ,� Boni res. Z �ll� 1' �r � ,ir.J �\' ElliEtitic WSJ t7 1u'T�3 1 ��I��� � � 7 tom•+ 'r i-- 1. I g..7' 1 m ®iAO ..vt r.� :';•:t# �' ill ' ,,,,, ki,,‘�, a /��k! g� \ . y I�.is i6 r i ,' 3+ '. i),--, vikti 0.ir ir.t 7--1/, 1113 i I I I IIII Pr 111115 P111117 --Iti 1 I Iltirjr7 . , / •41. 161 " -'": . --IWILIIIIIIIIIIP.:11 iirlAA i;i ',•I - -P-7,,,,,fflitldll cie.),A. • lir- -,tt..' • .....11:_iN., 1.2 01 _-_. --_-_ ,...... Ng iiiii i .......,-I:...,.-„, . _ .... _ ma , ...,„,„ ,-.E.,,,,,,-,-, ii1ir7---141 .v.. ,,, ,_,■ ..,\,\A ,,\ --- --,,,74,...1N,,, i � �� `i,?,„l,4,,-,,F-,o,,,,„,,-i-,. �Ilt..h...31 , ,4t =ye ®r. 1ul1l1 'A►• ,,Ai,..r4 w-A d,i_k__4l',4,-,_i l\,4, A P-1 ,:a - tiA 7 d ClitiNgik rifigi"17.h; ' I. --.---''' 4111 %'446t ilijik M i' C* IV! .1 11"001*** lin tratits1Te V, iL V I 57' \ til ...ni.....ri‘ 112 n-a Li Anil! .1 -Fi a E ti \!.... ac itc Tao Al II-II 01,, ,,,,,..\ II A*SZ,..rt;i. \ '..:11. 1”./....1 1 'Iii ‘,. • a-_,_ ili :IV 7 � I la "Ai co i cam il ; = 1 ;�k.\\\ , \` . ,.._ is r---- =a r 111, ' Ill jam im ..,:ci& INK; Ai „ r• . _'-'''.4 , `�� TILT EPIC �.^•. I�� - •gyp �� L I\ I -- _J • WI T e,. '• u' i \II ,. �\� r ,M T 1 s I 1,,...-!, ; :;' .I i A.:•/4 al n � itkili ili Vf 1 1 *FAR . " . II-I I 314 f \ '''.R-6_1 il IFPN liNI I MI Hr , . • T Pr' ' - —riMt _, kizi k tY o,4, RENTON AIRPORT IRP/B/PW Technical Services R. MacOnie, D. Visneski Airport & Zoning. Des I n a N. O 24 April 1995 --- g RESIDENTIAL, 1LU1,TI-FAMILI EMPLOYMENT AREA RC i Resource Conservation RM-C Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center CA Commercial Arteri T-71 Residential - 1 du/ac RM-U Residential Multi-Family Urban Center Co Commercial Office City'-. ;en ton Department of Planning/Building/I ;Works ' ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICAYION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1:blice._ COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 07, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-009,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 24, 1997 APPLICANT: US RENTALS PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: US RENTALS WORK ORDER NO: 78181 LOCATION: Lind Avenue&SW 34th Street SITE AREA: 4.17 Acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 11,990 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action[Site Plan Approval]for a proposal to construct an 11,990 square foot metal building for an equipment rental facility. The project would include outdoor equipment storage areas(secured), landscape material storage bins, above ground fuel storage, and customer parking. Access driveways would be located off of SW 34th Street and Lind Avenue. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Ssorellne Use Utilities ansp Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 6.2 police calls for service estimated annually, based on the size of the building. This area of Renton reportsdthe highest number of Commercial Burglaries and thefts from constructin sites. Recommend that the applicant fence in the lot with security fencing while the site=is under construction, and use security lighting as well. Tools will need to have the model and serial numbers recorded, to aid in recovery if they are stolen. If a construction site trailer is used as an office, it will need heavy duty dead-bolt locks and auxiliary locks, plus metalubars over any windows, to help prevent entry by a thief. The;..building _itselfr will( also need heavy-duty dead-bolt locks on all exterior doors, and )0XWXXWWJ ) ieNTW security lighting around the building and in the parking lot. An alarm system is also highly recommended; also in the fenced in storage area. Every business in Renton that has a fenced in storage area, has been broken into and has had vehicles vandalized and stolen from. This area win:need extensive lighting, and I also recommend that the fenced portion have barbed-wire across the top (to help prevent burglars from jumping _the fence) . C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Si ature of Directo r Au horized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 City.___!enton Department of Planning/Building/F<.____ Works I ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Wtiettik tfv1 Ite—N OMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 07, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-009,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 24, 1997 APPLICANT: US RENTALS PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: US RENTALS WORK ORDER NO: 78181 LOCATION: Lind Avenue&SW 34th Street SITE AREA: 4.17 Acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 11,990 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action[Site Plan Approval]for a proposal to construct an 11,990 square foot metal building for an equipment rental facility. The project would include outdoor equipment storage areas(secured), landscape material storage bins, above ground fuel storage, and customer parking. Access driveways would be located off of SW 34th Street and Lind Avenue. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information , impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics 'Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation 'Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 5/RJ 0(4.R6 /r( / 1-6 itJ imSPgc,1a h u n SDPPOCO 1ff 146 6o1L5 We hay bow is applic 'on ith parti ular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a d ' a i o ate i e el`o pr petty assess this proposal. �' G- 28 -q Signature Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.D Rev.10/93 ..................................:::•::.::::•:::::•::::::.. �::........?.::.•.�:::.:.:.... :. .: .; :.::rr:r.r::::::r:::t�:r: su•i:,}.•r:: ::.::C!;:�.:y;i.{.,;r•:{;%;£;y£:�yr;" %::S;i!%,: ;..f•:•:.�{.k:.>•:•r.t•::.:•:r.. .::3.•: n�( /� •rian: b:••:.•.t•::+.:•::,..r.£�:t::.;:.;•:..£.:•rr;£'v.•;:...f •:���:?�:.•:•:•P'•t;•+.��.::::s.:....r.:........:..rrr::{?�6.'::;t•::. :::.�::t }�� .;;.y,::rr.::... •rr. £. •: r i. .! :t.tv....: ..£:.. �::t•:•:; r.3.r:r.r�:;:r.;i>••'l•:•:.:.n.r:.t•.ur.•rrnlr•irrr i/r. :::..::.,..;£....f..:r.....y.;{..�:..............:........... ......::•:•:..... .......... ...::::.:fr........r....:.:r. ::•:. •.. .. ...:•:::r. ..lrr:5:t. :;......r rr:.s:•'•:$'>'{� s:%;: ..r{,:;.;%•../ •::+:•::r1:::::.<...:;•.:•::.<.,.. ::•::::•:.u.•::::r>.•:::•:.•r..::::•..:.1...:::•::..�•::•::.::t..> i.. .r.•r.f:..r:•lr,. r f �:trt ::.t::/.v:•:::... t't ::.rr.•::.r{.'y;f•:t{r;..•.:`::�£££:22'.?:S•':o££i'•�:f�:''/.•',:tr'.rr£:•;:::..:.r..:...:r.:•::.ter?:�;tr:•:>:<•::>:::.:..,.:....... .. ' .:.,...t. ..�. .................:. .:..... .....>...+ . .... ...r.t.:.::...:::...::::....:.....{:...r.r:::::::..........rr;.:.:trr>:;::.:;:s:.:::::::.�::: ::rr..........:.. SURROUNDINGP. o:TR- '.X::.::.::::.::.£::{.:::::•:::::.:.:::.:::.�:::•.v?•v£.•£::•:::::: I .........:...............:..... .........r....n.........• ..... ..... ...... ..:.. :: ....n.....:.:::::::w::�:v:?Oi:Si:•i:•:�:G:££££:'t•£:{{?t•?tW:::::•::••r................................v•:.� .......:?:w:•:::•.u.�.�::::xr:?:wn::.....•••:f::::::::::.�:.:::.w.:v.�:w:: :...... v: :•::•w•. .::.., ...{ ..............v.........................:v........................... .� .. ....................:h?•:;i'4:•iiii'h:::��i:£;?�:?ti.?$�.:>.?•i�tLiiiii'}t; • :fe ;nlr::�e>:5�be.�::s+t�::£:::<.£>£:<.<.::::r>:>.>:>::::::;::;�::::.:;•t::...::•:>.�:.:;.;..�:::.::t�:+;;>:.�::::•::•:t. PROJECT NAME: U.S. RENTALS — ...TEMPORARY FACILITY APPLICATION NO: - 001 ect- The following is.a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject.site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER HCWA Realty Corp 3345 Michelson Drive 125360-0020-05 c/o HomeBase Support Center Orvine, CA 92715 Eastgate Theatre Inc 919 SW Taylor, Ste. 900 125360-0030-03 DBA Renton Cinimas#311 Portland, OR 97205 Seattle Fur Exchange 200 SW 34th Street 125380-0040-07 PO Box 88159 Seattle, WA 98138 • Consolidated Freightways PO Box 3175 125380-0050-04 Attn: Financial Acct. Dept. Portland, OR 97208 Holton, Joseph F. 2098 S. Breezy Point Rd. 125380-0060-02 Camano Island, Wa 98292 Farwest Steel Corporation PO Box 889 125380-0080-02 -• Eugene, OR 97403 Valley Industrial Bldg. 12835 Bel-Red Road, Ste. 140 • 125380-0170-09 do R. J. Hallissey Co.. Inc Agt Bellevue, WA 98005 Farwest Steel Corporation-,•.,tw.•.,.481P0•box 889 125380-0211=00..• ... Eugene, OR 97403 Arensberg Investments PO Box 88932 125381-0010-02 Seattle, WA 98188 • The Boeing•Company. PO Box 3703 M/S #1F-09. 125381-0020-00 Seattle, WA a 124 Sabey, David;? 101 Elliott Avenue W. 125381-0040-06 Seattle, WA 98119 s Raden, Gary,, • 18289 Olympic Avenue S. 125381-0120-09 ,,`• Seattle, WA 98188 Pacific Northwest Group A 3131 S. Vaughn Way, Ste. 214 362304-9001-07 do George McElroy Assoc. Inc. Aurora, CC 30014 gFr,,EIVED JAY 2 0 1997 �vt�urnnENT PLANNINC. It (Continued) • w; • NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL I NUMBER ;I Applicant Certification I, 4N4a a. free .i t? , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: 0 City of Renton Technical Services Records 0 Title Company Records Ki unt Assessors Records Signed Date l /97 (Applicant) . NOTARY, --_. .. ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at 1 i v (c( ( t)(a, on the (444 day o T"` ""^^. , 19 9-7 . Signed �C NOTARY PUBLIC 11 (Notary Public) — STATE OF WASHINGTON ,M"e''�""naW�nrAlreaJUL 20• ,1997 f::R n n�:r. i e s >:I ITOE<::: >IL N'" 0 0 `.l Ci t• Ey ?< ..., �n...::': •,> :..;;s>`:>;K �•' t '': .:: .. .:..:{ }' ' < e > e(ereb" certi :tiatn'otc 'oftfie ro oed;a Micaion'were mai edto . mo;: e t : >: :;•:.::S::.%:;:::>:.<: :::;::::::s:.::i:::::i:�>:�::i::; ":i:;:>:.. ::.R :::::::: :::::i:::::i.i..:i: ::::i:'.::::::2::<•i.'i>.<::%�: ::;::::�::::::`>::i::::':;:::2:::::;:::>:?:%:::::%%::<.: .1. 4 adki j.s e� r ::owner.•:o •:::•::::.::*,.....-::,,,,•.+....` .'. ::.:•.;;;:•;::.:.:::•:•::::.t:•:•:•:•::::. :::•.:;:;.;:.;;;::;:•:.::•; ;.:: •; ; •; :. >;;:....0..w.,,,i,. :::•:;•: :-..R `::'j:::':::':2:?::�;�::::::::':`.:: �%:ii::$:•'::�<::::::::::: �:::i:::: :��::::::::�::i:::i;::`:;:::::::%:;:;:;::::':;::2':::::i::::::::::':::2i >:{`':::> :;:;::.;�::.;�•.::•;.•::.;:::..,::::•:;cam S.�gned� �fi0L. .:..:.:.:...:::.::......:...:...:..........,..... Date. � .'"�'> i v:: I .........,.....: .................................. .:...:::::::::::.:::::.w;:v:.�::::•::..::.�::.�:.::.::.�::::•.::�:::::::: .:•::::::::..�:........:.::.:::.::::.:..:::....:.:•....::......::::.::iii':iiv::>:i:+i[;ii: :::':::::i:iiiii'�::::{::is ..............................................:...:::::•:::.�::.::::::.::..:::•::::•.:•.:................... :::::•i:•::::Ci:iB:ii::?•i vi::•}};?:;{viY:;::4i:•'?J}:•:?4:::•i:i.;.'.;y,:ivii:•:'i.zf+..K.•� .::.�:::..::.:.�::v.:............................................ . .�:.�:..NOTARY.::::::::.::.�::::::.:�:.::�.::::.�::::.:::.::::::::.�:::..::::.,....�::::.:.::.:.::.:.....:::....:...:.:•..: .::.;:;:. ATTEST`;5` ••s•riiied'and sworn before me°:::a:N••toy public, and for;the.Sta a of:Washiii ton<:::> . ry residin¢.ate�'� .<�.'• . `::'`•�•'g<<��;<:>:°•>�:•' ::•�'on,the;, dayof::: . .. � .. ..:...:,..:..,.:.;�9���:• :; ::>:i<><'� ustprop.doc G/q/'9o' REV 07405 2 I f NOTICE OF .-. .OPOSED ENVIRONMENTA -,4PPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON An Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) and Administrative Site Plan Approval (SA) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: US RENTALS/LUA-97-009,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) and Administrative Site Plan Approval (SA) to construct an 11,990 square foot metal building for an equipment rental facility. The proposed project would include outdoor equipment storage areas (secured), landscape material storage bins, above ground fuel storage, and customer parking. Access driveways would be located off of SW 34th Street and Lind Avenue. GENERAL LOCATION: Lind Avenue and SW 34th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. __ _____ _ i I • g . i SW.3tST Y i / r li . US. RENTALS SW.34 ...........ii)Al .v„ ,..: • ,FARWEST i. 1 . . . STEEL fij / 1 A , , i I I I 1 Fay, I . ,ff Id °a I` — 1 a. ST. :'•:, �.:' i F I Z I l I 10 �.•y;.,.�•r � VALLEYM l � . r n 1 r � GENMALOT.DOC D �I I r+--r S.W.41ST ST. 1 / I ♦ r� • ..1\1 rtinCE . PENDING APPLICATION PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: US RENTALS I LUA-97-009,SA,ECF ' DESCRIPTION: The applicant Is requesting Environmental Checklist Review(ECF)and Administrative Site Plan Approval(SA)to construct en 11,900 square loot metal building for an equipment rental facility.The proposed project would include outdoor equipment storage Gress(secured),landscape material storage bins,above ground fuel I storage,and customer parking.Access driveways would be located off of SW 34th Street end Und Avenue. GENERAL LOCATION: Lind Avenue and SW 34th Street • PUBUC APPROVALS: • _Building Permit _Preliminary Plat _Short Plat Conditional Use Permit _Rezone XXXX Site Plan Approval XXXX Environmental Review -ShorelinePermit Conditional Use _Other _Fill&Grade Permit _Shoreline Substantial _Other ' Development Permit - - • The application can be reviewed In the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. I Comments will be accepted any time prior to Public Hearings,during Public Hearings,or prior to an administrative site plan approval.Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the lest dale of applicant's'Notice of Application'publication In the Valley Daily News. For further information on the application,or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental ' determinations.appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s)for this project,please contact the Development • • Services Division at 235.2550. 7 5 Jlfl o . • Ij '....1 U.S.'ENTALS '"=. I .1,A 1 0 jj,] . i all IL-H7) I Ir1.-• rt -- _ _nv. 1( - I 1 \.--. r- PLEASE JNCLUDEINCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER-WHEN CALLING FOR'PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION:. ' . CERTIFICATION • • I, SGLYrLV ,)aCK---S m , hereby certify that 3 copies-of the above document , were posted by me in conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on. . Ja.vtua+(y g'i 199'1 • Signed: • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfaciory evidence that 540 y J n)- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and valUn ary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. _ �'- ` ' • Dated: 1'a-4q°1 _ Notary Pu i in and r the Stale of Washington Notary ( int) nl yi RC-RCT J. v G! LLB My appointment expires: (a/11/q18 NOTARY.00C , . 1 1110-rtrcE 1 PENDING APPLICATION PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: US RENTALS/LUA-97-009,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) and Administrative Site Plan Approval(SA)to construct an 11,990 square foot metal building for an equipment rental facility. The proposed project would include outdoor.equipment storage areas (secured), landscape material storage bins, above ground fuel storage,and customer parking. Access driveways would be located off of SW 34th Street and Lind Avenue. GENERAL LOCATION: Lind Avenue and SW 34th Street . PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit Preliminary Plat Short Plat Conditional Use Permit Rezone XXXX Site Plan Approval XXXX Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Use Other . Permit Fill&Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial Other Development Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any time prior to Public Hearings,during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last date of applicant's"Notice of Application"publication in the Valley Daily News. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. it3V -s y , . ,. ik_ 1. •Ifi U:S. �ENTALS aw.a. •F11NWEST 1 j . STEEL •,.......,[1/ . 1 1, IF 1 ~~ a I i Oa— ~ Y .--I H T :• 1 I H 1 I IH re. H VALLEY I �- tt Ll SW.41ST ST. PLEASEINCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER=WHEN CALLING•;FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION OF RENTON .ELL ty. t., Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator January 24, 1997 • Mr. Barton Treece, Jr., P.E. Treece &Company 320 Second Avenue South,#200 Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: US Rentals Project No. LUA-97-009,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Treece: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application for Administrative Site Plan Approval (SA) and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on February 18, 1997. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at 235-2517, if you have any questions. Sincerely, PQA Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Powell-Orilla Associates/Owners ACCPTLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer orkpi4-1 < `PR'•;.<'''>`E'CT<I.N F O R M1°T)>:».»<>;: > > '><``< > > ' :::::::::::.�:::::::::::.�::::::::::::PRO..... ............. ................... ...)...................................... .......................:..:::::::::::::::::....::.:..::.._::::::....::::::.::...:....:.�..:.:... ....................................:::. :Note f there�s 9 more.:.:than:on:e le a) owners: _lease:attach an additio`nal`.P nbtaiized:IVfasfer Appl cation foY eachwner PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: POWELL-ORILLA ASSOCIATES U.S. RENTALS PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 737 Market Street Lot 8, BNBSP Lind Avenue at SW 34th St. , southeast corner CITY: Kirkland ZIP: 98033 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 125360-0070-04 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206) 828-4444 EXISTING LAND USE(S): Vacant €i 'A.P::..P...:L.:.CAN.:.::::.(.:.:::..o...t.:....:.............:..::................1.:::.::...:..::..:... PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: Rental facility for U.S. Rentals including equipment yard and minor repair/maintenance operation. COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: U.S. RENTALS Employment Area - Valley ADDRESS: 4600 Northgate Blvd. , Suite 100 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): CITY: Sacramento ZIP: 95834 EXISTING ZONING: Heavy Industrial (IH) • TELEPHONE NUMBER: (916) 646-1012 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): Cq :‘� N/A 9 <:>::::; ::<::::<:>::::::::>::::»:<:>:>::::: N: . »: .. :RS `' >�» > ><«><``'<`<» »><> > 9 SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): 3P s �IAN\1� NAME: Barton G. Treece, Jr. , P.E. 4.172 acres vo�'M�F1�N-c014 COMPANY (if applicable): TREECE & COMPANY PROJECT VALUE: • $1,000,000.00 • • ADDRESS: 320 Second Avenue S. , #200 ' IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? No CITY: Kirkland ZIP: 98033 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: No (206) 822-2577 1 i1.' ,.' .::.... ................:. :»::;>::::::::>:<::._.:><>>: >>:LEG�;�C`DES:CRI.P, lNOF•:P;RtJ:P:ERTY'' 4t'ta°cl °se .ar... h.eet.:...f..:................. ... . I........................:::.:.::: _,:EE :>`:::>:'''::''' €'' ": '':'''''"':':''>::'•::''""" ' >' `:'::: :>:» >:>><:»:< »«::<>: <>:::::>:>:Ch eckal[ a ( ton : . es> h a 1. -.�.Cit >s... aff...:w.....ill:<:.......t.. e...rm.....in...efe..e...s..:.»..>.:>.::.<.€:..<.:.:..:.>.:::.:..<.:.>...>.>.:.>....>.:.<..:.i.;:.d:. :>.:.:._ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ I _ REZONE ' $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ g SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ /oax a o _ FINAL PLAT $ II _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ i (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY . —WAIVER $ FINAL -_ ! _WETLAND PERMIT $ 1 ROUTINE VEGETATION— MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ ' MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: 1'1 SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _VARIANCE $ EXEMPTION $No Charge ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ SOO.0D — REVISION $ .111 ::::>:>><:;:::>::<<::«:<:::»:>:::::<::::>::::>::::«::::>:::;>: :>;»::::>::»<:>:<::<:::>:::»:::>::::::::>:<::<>::::<::<AFFrDAVITOFO;WN.ER.SH I ..... .......... . .... Jr. I, (Print Name)BartOn G. Treece,, declare that I am (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application, X the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. i . ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public,in and Bart G. Treece, Jr. - Treece & Company for the State of '�l.�A� residing a (Na of 0' v ner/ n ati ) ICiN lam , on the .I day of '1'w.+u.w.� 19 Gri ignat a of caner/Representativ 11 !, • (Signature of Notary Public) - I ri2LL Oh. vh . s(•e `` ; St i><'''s� �� :o :: a C� ... .. .ff.,[:>>`< >$ <<<<>< >< :`:>< >'�> << <<<' ! <<>>::::.;:::::t.>:.;:: s to : :::::<: . . .:.:.::::::::: ;: :::: :..: • ..... .. ........... :.:'.;:.;:.:CU: ::LLA:::;;:::p:P<:>::>::FP:;::::>::T:P:..::>>::::SP.....RVIVI.P.....0............. ..�... :::;<;;;:.>::<.><::<:::>:::Cit. >:1=lle;.:N.umbe.r:.:;;�..:. ::..::..::::.�............ .. 5... :::::R.::SHPL.:::::.......:. ............................................................................ . .... : .::....... ......................................................................... .. . :. ...:.... :!:!.;:::< „,,.,....P:>>€:Ili:> >.�:P.:<< > > >>'>:>:< : < <:< :» .�:..: .. :::. : ::::::.;..�::.;' :::: . .:�:::::::::::::.:::.::::.�::::::.AAD:.. W.......P.U.......5........SM.�.,...;ivLH........;.�..,.;;................:A:::..;::..........., ..... ..... ........::....,.m........... . .:::::::::::: ::::::::::T.QTAL:F.EE5.:: '��1.. : : �O.T;AE. PQ.S.TAGEP.RQ....:.DED ..:::.:...�`��`.(����d.:::.:.:::::.;:.:.:.::.::.::::::::.:::::..::... MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 9/96 .. II LEGAL DESCRIPTION U.S. RENTALS SITE- RENTON, WASHINGTON A portion of Southwest 1/4 of Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., described as follows: Lot 8 of Burlington Northern Binding site Plan (BSP-014-92), per map recorded in Volume 161 of Plats, pages 8 through 11 inclusive, under Recording No. 920630296, Records of King County, Washington. Tax Assessor No. 125360-0'070-04 IQ 111 'OWELL DEVELOPMENT CO 737 Market Street Kirkland,WA 98033 (206)828-4444 FAX(206)822-8297 October 14, 1996 • Bart Treece HORTON DENNIS &ASSOCIATES 320 Second Ave. So. Kirkland, WA 98033 RE: LOT 8/LOT 7-ORILLIA RENTON,WA Dear Bart: This letter will act as confirmation that you are authorized by the,owner, :Powell-Orillia Associates, to :sign on our behalf in the matters of application or SEPA review and permits. Should any of the agencies of the City of Renton, King County, or-the State of • Washington have any._questions,they can reach me at 828-4444. fmt: • 'eter W. Powell President jgt PROJECT NARRATIVE U.S. RENTALS SITE- RENTON, WASHINGTON P ll- rill owe O a Associates is proposing to build a facility for U.S. Rentals on Lot 8 of the Burlington Northern Binding Site Plan, which is a 4.172 acre site located in the southeast corner of the intersection of Lind Avenue and SW 34th Street. The site is currently vacant with no existing improvements or special site features (please refer to B-Twelve report attached). There are no existing residential units or structures which would have views obstructed as a result of the project. The proposed use of the property will bean equipment rental facility for U.S. Rentals and will consist of a 11,990 square foot metal building, equipment storage areas (secured), customer parking, landscape material storage bins and above ground fuel storage facility and the associated landscaping, fencing and drainage improvements. The building will consist of a±1,390 square foot wash rack (covered) with an oil grit separator within the drainage outfall system, approximately 6,000 square feet of equipment maintenance`area with the balance being offices and retail sales/rental area. It should be noted at this point that maintenance is limited to preventative-type and minor repairs. The U.S.Rental fleets are kept in new condition, and engine overhauls and other large scale maintenance schedules are not necessary. Should those events arise, however, those pieces are sent out to dealer shops for the required maintenance. The maximum building height envisioned at this time is 21 feet to the peak of the central ridge which will run longitudinally with the long axis of the building. At this time, all impervious improvements (consisting of building, parking, etc.)will cover approximately 66% of the site with the balance given to landscaping and water quality features. As a part of this construction, we anticipate parking for 23 customers with primary access being two drives from Lind Avenue and one entry from SW 34th Street. With regard to operational issues, anydeliveryof large equipment to the site would generallyfrom g be East Valley Freeway, SW 41st Street, north along Lind Avenue, into the southerly drive on Lind. After off-loading or in the event equipment is being delivered from the site, delivery vehicles would typically exit on the SW 34th Street drive, turn right and proceed to East Valley Road then southerly to SW 43rd Street and then onto Valley Freeway. This facility, when completed, will employ 16 employees with hours of operation from 7:00 in the morning to 5:30 in the evening, seven days per week. This is to be a complete rental facility with a customer drive-up, deliveries, cleaning and maintenance (please note maintenance discussion above). The typical customer base is construction (60%), industrial (30%) and homeowners (10%). The landscape material bins will be used to store such typical landscape materials as beauty bark, mulch, peat, gravel, etc., for both the homeowner and commercial markets. RECEIVED JAN 2 0 1997 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON Duringthe pre-application meetingseveralpoints were raised byCityof Renton staff that might p PP g appropriately be addressed at this time. Fire Prevention - This building is less than 12,000 square feet. We do not propose to sprinkle the building. It is our understanding that we would need at least three fire hydrants. There are two existing fire hydrants along the Lind Avenue frontage and two along the SW 34th Street frontage, all of which are within 300 feet of the building with one of the hydrants on Lind Avenue being within 150 feet of the building. We will be submitting separate plans and permits for the installation of the above-ground fueling tanks. Water - As this facility is enclosed by a water main loop consisting of the Lind, SW 34th, Farwest Steel and Act III connections to Lind, we are served by a looped water system. At this point all necessary meters can be set in public right-of-ways and no easements will be required. Wastewater- Sewer service for the proposed three bathrooms and wash bay will be to the sanitary sewer existing in SW 34th Street. Please note on the plans we are indicating in the oil/grit separator for used wash water from the wash bay(manufacturers cut sheet attrached). Storm Drain-As part of this submittal, a storm drainage report is enclosed which addresses the requirements per King County Surface Water Manual. Due to the site shape and topography, as well as the placement of buildings and other areas, please note the interior storm drainage system consists of sheet flow away from the building to the swales along the east and westerly property lines which will perform as bio-swales, thence to detention and water quality facilities in the southerly portion of the site. Outfall from these facilities will be • to an existing storm drainage stub at Lind Avenue. Traffic-As ITE has no data for these types of facilities, the preliminary review is based upon historical data from similar facilities which consists of trips generated by 16 employees and 30 to 40 customers per day. Research and other records for documented studies for similar facilities has been instituted by The Transpo Group and their analysis is attached. During the review and approval process (SEPA and site plans) a building pre-load plan and application will be prepared and submitted for review/approval. It is our intent to place the building pre-load after the SEPA appeal period and,in the ensuing 8 to 10 weeks prepare, submit and receive the necessary approvals and permits for foundation, building and site construction. We believe that the information furnished is consistent with the submittal requirements for SEPA and site plan review and approvals. • p •_ iic '\s'• 1%• _:s„- ' ... .. . fi • WOO' ECOLUME 14" and 18 " • ` The Ecolume is a rectilinear area luminaire. The precision • segmented optical systems provide required illumination levels. """ • even illumination, wide pole spacings, and glare control. The housing is dieformed, the door frame is extruded aluminum and • the lens is clear tempered glass. The EC luminaire is completely ' -', •• . • sealed and gasketed preventing intrusion by moisture, insects and cointaminants, a • , ,: ::.. _ .;,j Photometric Distributions: :,�u ;: c..,�:,vr.'. . x• �:.:'':")•t-C it{3S.11.0.. j T..'r +A;fr,• ;►.� +j�."'• �( a 1,;t` °`� L' r : r -.•"t,r ,t' l f l�f"v;� � � ,a,,..�•4 fl' o, au; Vertical Lump IioricuntalLamp • i • `��.k p},,L:p Fie • .- t L: Tyre V Square(QV) Type III 1311) r �. j�' :i4L' `.;•.. 11.ii r. ..F.t. 1<,6.rLjl`tit=•••`._y,4.• ,K- 1'1 r,,;r,' ..i•% yt• h r 'w.* Forward Throw iil : ti . .., Tyne V Squ�rc fQf{1 r''•_~' Ordering Information: - . . - Prefix Size Configuration' Distribution Wattage Voltage Finish EC 14 • Horizontal Lamp 114 120 BRP = Bronze Paint 18 1 , 1 Ea. 3H =Type III I 70 HPS 208 BLP = Black Paint F =Forward 1100 HPS 240 Throw 1150 HPS 277 WP = White Paint 101 2 0_'0 OH'=T yP e V 1001 Mill 460 NP = Natural Aluminum Paint 4 0 Square 175 MH SC = Special Color Paint(Specify) • 18 i� 250 HPS • il Vertical LRmp A 250 MH 0V'=Type V 400 HPS Square 400 MH ! ECA 181 - 3H - 400MH - 277 - BRP - RA - MVR "400/U Mounting' i Options: Clear Lamps'(with lixlures): • A =Arm Mount PCR° = Twistlock Photocontrpl MF • Mast Arm Fitter W =Wall Mount Receptacle only POLY= Polycarbonate Sag Lens LUDO = 70W HPS(E 23 1/2) P1= =Yoke Mount PCT' - Twistlock Photocontrol ACR' Acrylic SagLens LU100 = 100W HPS(E23 112) Fits EMCO rY LU150/55 - 150W HPS (E-23 1/2) SSSS Pole F = Single Fuse In-Head AP = Adjustable Knuckle P2' = Yoke Mount (Specify120V or 277V) LU250 = 250W HPS (E•18) - Pole Mount LU400 o 400W HPS (E•18) Poie Top Fitter FF, = Double Fuse (Specify AT = Adjustable Knuckle M100/U/MED = 100W MH(ED-17) • Fits 2/a' 208V,240V or 480V) . Tenon Mount MVR175/U a 175W MH (E-28) O.D. Tenon LF = In-Pole/In-LIne fusing P3' =Yoke Mount HS = Internal House Side Shield Clnfei: MVR250/U = 250W MH(E•28) Pole Top Fitter LA = Direct to pole mounting 'ECW and ECP•always use(11 MVR400/U ., 400W MH(E•'37) • Fits 3 -3'/:" 18'units only MVF1175/HOR = 175W Super MH(E•28) (less arm)only available t p MS250/BU = 250W Super MH(E-28) i O.D. Tench w/Sinple and twin Medium Base Lam Pa Yoke Mount For Direct to pole mount MVR250/HOR = 250W Super MH(E.28) Pole Top Finer luminaires of 180° specify LA option MVR400/HOR 4 400W Super MH(E-37) - Fits 4'0.0. RA • Radiused Arm (round pole) '120,208/240/277v Standard Tenon °Supplied Standard with QV Optics MS400/BU = 400W Super MH(8 37) WA .,Wall Mount 'Leave blank if lamp by others ' with Arm 'Photocontrols limited to 1000V maximum. N/A w/480V .,-#.117.441.r.THOMAS- 2661 Alvarado Street. San Leandro, CA 94577 800,227.0758 (CA) 510.357,6900 FAX 510.357.3088 EMC:0 LIGHTING I`� 1 CLARIFIERS 24"CAST IRON FRAME&COVER • • i WITH GASKET(GASTIGHT)3 STANDARD . AS REQUIRED -- ` (AT EXTRA COST) r js- 2432-03RiSER 3 sei --f ;r -! - .?--• 2432-06 RISER-6" Y - • i+ b j - ' - 2432-12 RISER-12" 4 , ', : y VARIABLE t . 'a5"MINIMUM 4 IV INVERTS• ; ..; .:• . :•. •:;1 i. •, • INLET R ' INVERT t 4"INLET . OUTLET s i &'OUTLET PIPE AND o- FITTINGS STANDARD t. , C DIV SIDE VIEW CUTAWAY E • A ' r 1 ► e a I B 1 • • 0I b IQLA ITOP VIEW I (COVERS I I &RISERS) I I REMOVED • I I • J ,ga • BOX DESIGN LOAD: H-20 TRAFFIC UP TO 6'COVER. FOR COMPLETE DESIGN INFORMATION,CONSULT JENSEN PRECAST. • MODEL CAPACITY LIQUID DIMENSION DIMENSION DIMENSION DIMENSION DIMENSION MINIMUM MINIMUM NUMBER GALLONS A B C D E EXCAVATION EXCAVATION • LENGTH LENGTH CL-750 750 4'-0" 8'-1" 6'-3" 5'-0" 4'-9" 5'0" 9' 1" 1 CL-1000 1000 5'-1" 8'-2" 6'-3" 5'-0" 4'-9" 6' 1„ 9'2„ CL-1200 1200 5'9" 8'-6" 6'-6" 5'-0" 4'-9" 6'-9" 9'-6" CL-1500 1500 5'-7" 10.-8" 6-3" '5'-0" 4'-9" 6 7" 11'j8" CL-2000 2000 4'-11" 15'-11" 6'-0" 5'-0" 4'-9" 5'-11" 16'-11" • CL-2500 2500 5'-9" 16.-10" 6'-0" 5'-0" 4'-9" 6.-9" 17.-10" CL-3000 3000 5'-9" 16.-10" 6'-9" 5'-9" 5'-6" 6•-9" 17.-10" CL-4000 4000 7'-8" 16'-7" 6'-9" 5'-6" 5'-3" 8%8" 17.-7" • CL-5000 5000 7'-8" 16.-7" 7'-11" 6'-9" 6'-6" 8.-8" 17'-7 • • 2/90 _ ©f990 Jensen Precast • PRECAST Since 1968 CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION U.S. RENTALS SITE-RENTON, WASHINGTON With a January 20, 1997 submittal of the SEPA and site plan approval documents, we would anticipate submitting plans and applications for a Building Preload Permit on or about February 24. We anticipate approvals and issuance of this permit concurrent with the expiration of the SEPA comment period,which is estimated to be the first week in March. At that time, placement of preload materials will commence and,in the ensuing 8 to 10 weeks, final construction plans for foundations, building and site construction will be submitted and approvals received during the last week in April. At that time, excess preload material will be removed from the building area, spread on site as site fill and construction of foundation and site improvements commenced. It is anticipated that from this time, approximately six weeks will be necessary to complete site construction(depending, of course, on weather conditions) with a completion of construction efforts and opening of this facility for business approximately June 10, 1997. It is envisioned that construction, once.begun, will be performed between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. - or other hours as specified by City of Renton ordinances, six days per week. As.with other facilities in the area either recently completed or under construction at this time, it is anticipated that the hauling and transportation routes will utilize the Valley Freeway/41 st Street/Lind Avenue routes into the site and SW 34th/East Valley Road/Valley Freeway exits. During construction, minimization of dust, mud, noise and other noxious characteristics will be accomplished by the appropriate methods of sprinkling, washing wheels, street sweeping, all equipment is muffled and construction will proceed as expeditiously as possible so as to minimize the overall time frame. Transportation and traffic impacts are anticipated to be less than associated impacts of nearby sites as this construction effort is quite smaller in scale than previous sites in the area. As always,the owners, contractors and the engineer will work closely with City of Renton staff and building inspectors to address any anticipated problems in a speedy and efficient manner. JAB 2 n ?,997 pFV�Lop,��, CITyoFR f 0�iviN; bt:966402.mit 944 aict,v4_ ete4Q, aer) ZA.Pe-cc eiel-9Z4/ 4,2 A_ ! <04<z) Z)t cO. f011-Fi11119 Lgrze,7/7 • ,r,041 G.1-0. -sc)\<• 64A1 11 Or 1 1 I 1 I - - p00.-/ Environmental Checklist Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA),chapter 43.21C RCW,requires all government agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS)must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions For Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully,to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer,or if a question does not apply to your proposal,write"do not know"or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations,such as zoning,shoreline,and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems,the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for non project proposals: Complete this checklist for non-project proposals,even though questions may be answered"does not apply." IN ADDITION,complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D). For non-project actions,the references in the checklist to the words"project,""applicant,"and"property or site" should be read as"proposal,""proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project,if applicable: U. S. Rentals, Renton, Washington 2. Name of Applicant: Barton G. Treece, Jr., P. E. for Powell-Orilla (property owner) 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: • Treece&Company 320 Second Avenue South P <0 f Kirkland WA 98033 OE�ELOp ^ '�� Mr. Barton Treece (206) 822-2577 ct7yopR o�tvi�G 4. Date checklist prepared: December 3, 1996 1 SEPA Rules To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation Agency Use Only 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable): Construction is proposed to commence February 1997 with completion scheduled for July, 1997. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions,expansions,or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes,explain. Temporary Use Permit- Lot 7 BNBSP 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared,or will be prepared,directly related to this proposal. Site reconnaissance by B-Twelve and Associates (copy of report attached). 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for government approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,explain. Application for a Temporary Use Permit on a portion of Lot 7. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,if known. • SEPA • Site Plan Approval • Building Pre-Load permit • Grading and Building permits 11. Give brief,complete description of your proposal,including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Construction of a 11,990 S.F. rental, maintenance and storage building on a 4.172 acre site with parking stalls and related site civil and landscaping improvements (see attached project narrative.) 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project,including a street address,if any,and section,township,and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,site plan,vicinity map, and topographic map,if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The general location of the project is the southern portion of Renton in the Green River Valley; Burlington Northern Binding Site Plan, Lot 8 as per lot line adjustment Auditor's number 9511-2990-06 King County. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site(circle one): Flat,rolling,hilly, steep slopes,mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? Maximum 1% 2 SEPA Rules To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation Agency Use Only c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example,clay,sand,gravel,peat,muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify them and note any prime farmland. A soils report is provided as an attachment to this checklist. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose,type,and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. 9,500 cubic yards of fill material to be imported to the site from local borrow pits f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so,generally describe. Yes, soil erosion could occur in connection with the proposed development since the entire site would be stripped of vegetation. Even though the site is flat, erosion could occur during rain and/or wind storms that occur during the construction phase of the project. To minimize this potential for soil erosion, site preparation techniques would include temporary detention ponds and filter fences to reduce the impact of water runoff on the surface soil. Landscaping will be placed on all surfaces not covered with impervious materials. No significant erosion is expected following project completion. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example,asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 66% coverage. Total Site Area: 181,732 s.f.; Building Area: 11,990 s.f.; Paving Area: 108,900 s.f. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth, if any: Erosion and sedimentation controls such as interceptor swales, straw bale barriers, silt fences and straw mulch for temporary erosion protection of exposed soils should be applied during construction. Stabilized construction entrances and wash pads should be installed at the beginning of construction and maintained for the duration of the project. All erosion and sedimentation control measures shall be installed and maintained in accordance with City of Renton requirements. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e.,dust,automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Development of the site, as proposed, would not result in any significant impacts to existing air quality. The primary impact from development of the proposed project are related to construction activities and future vehicle traffic. Dust generated from grading and construction vehicle activity would be a temporary nuisance in the general area. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any: Transport of materials on local streets should be controlled to minimized congestion during peak travel times. This would minimize secondary air quality impacts caused by reduced travel speeds. 3 SEPA Rules To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation Agency Use Only Dust produced by construction can be reduced by using a number of techniques. Areas of exposed soils such as storage yards, could be sprayed with water, oils, or chemical dust suppressants. Areas that might be exposed for prolonged periods of time should be covered with suitable ground cover to prevent wind erosion. Soils carried out of the construction area by trucks could be minimized by use of a rock mat as a transition zone from the construction site; wheel washing; washing or brushing truck undercarriages; and covering dusty truck loads. For soils that do escape the construction site on trucks, a daily street cleaning program for truck routes would help to minimize dust. 3. Water • a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year- round and seasonal streams,saltwater,lakes,ponds,wetlands)? If yes,describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2) Will the project require any work over,in,adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Does not apply 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. The proposed project will not require the withdrawal of surface water. However, surface water drainage will be conveyed to the storm drain system in Lind Avenue SW., west of the project site. Surface water runoff will be directed to an onsite water quality and detention facility. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so,note location on the site plan. No. According to the City of Renton Community Profile, 1989, the site of the proposed project is not within either the 100-year floodplain or floodway. The FEMA flood plain maps for the City of Renton depict the project site as being outside the 100-year floodplain as well. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No, all waste material from the site would enter the City's storm drain or sanitary sewer collection system. Based on the preliminary grading and utility plans for the project, all surface water runoff would be collected from paved areas and roof tops by storm drains and directed to an onsite water quality facility. b: Groundwater: 1)Will groundwater be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. No. 2)Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources,if any(for example: Domestic sewage; industrial,containing the following chemicals...; agricultural;etc.) Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the 4 SEPA Rules To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation Agency Use Only number of houses to be served(if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Does not apply. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal,if any(include quantities,if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe. Future construction of buildings and site improvements would cover up to_% of the site with impervious surfaces. This would result in storm water runoff that would drain to the Springbrook Creek, which flows back into the Black River. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe. Surface water could be contaminated by runoff containing oil and gas from parked cars on the parking lot and streets servicing the proposal. However, surface water runoff will be directed into an on-site water quality facility. No storage of hazardous materials on-site is proposed, other than an elevated diesel fuel and gasoline dispensing facility. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground, and runoff water impacts,if any: On-site storm drainage and water quality/detention capabilities. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _deciduous tree: alder,maple,aspen,other _evergreen tree: fir,cedar,pine,other shrubs X grass pasture _crop or grain _wet soil plants: cattail,buttercup,bullrush,skunk cabbage,other water plants:water lily,eelgrass,milfoil,other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All of the grasses and weeds on-site would be removed during the grading phase of construction. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping,use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,if any: All new landscaping and irrigation systems would be installed per the requirements of the City of Renton's landscaping ordinance. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds:hawk,heron,eagle,songbirds,other_Crows and Seagulls mammals:deer,bear,elk,beaver,other: Rodents fish:bass,salmon,trout,herring,shellfish,other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. 5 SEPA Rules To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation Agency Use Only c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None proposed. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kind of energy(electric,natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,manufacturing, etc. Electricity: Power, HVAC and Lighting. Natural Gas: Heating b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kind of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any: For the U.S. Rental facility, energy conservation would consist of an insulated building envelope, HVAC with heat recovery features, automatic energy management systems, energy efficient light fixtures. The State of Washington has adopted model conservation standards for new commercial buildings, and as the City of Renton has adopted these standards, this development would be consistent with these model standards. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards,including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk of fire and explosion,spill or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None to our knowledge. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire department, Police and ambulance services would be required on a basis consistent with similar facilities. No special services are required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,if any: None required. 8. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example:traffic, equipment,operation,other)? Traffic from SR 167 and local arterial(s) can be heard from the site, but would not affect the proposal. 2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long-term basis(for example:traffic,construction,operation,other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term: construction related (6 month duration) 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Long-term: normal commercial traffic associated with a rental facility; daily 7 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., 7 days a week. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any: Mufflers on construction equipment during the construction period. 6 SEPA Rules To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation Agency Use Only 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site-Vacant; adjacent site is a Home Base Warehouse store and Farwest Steel facility; surrounding sites are commercial and office uses. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? IM f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? IM g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Does not apply. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an"environmentally sensitive"area? If so,specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 16 employees would work in the completed project. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any: Does not apply 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed project is a prefabricated metal building that is smaller in size, design and scale of the other industrial, warehouse, and commercial buildings in the vicinity of the site. The type of use proposed is also consistent with land uses adjacent to the site and in the surrounding area. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,middle,or low-income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units,if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Does not apply 7 SEPA Rules To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation Agency-Use Only 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas;what is the principle exterior building material(s)proposed? Maximum building height would be 21 feet at the roof ridge. Principle exterior material would be painted metal storefront entrances/exits and metal canopies entrance/exits and service areas. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Appearance of the site would change from a vacant and undeveloped area to an urban use. Views from adjacent commercial and industrial uses toward the site would change from vacant fields to views of commercial uses with parking lots. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any: A landscaping strip and wrought iron fencing along the public right-of-way, interior parking lot landscaping, as required, and perimeter landscaping consisting of a variety of trees, shrubs, and ground cover are proposed. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Exterior lighting for the improvements resulting from the proposed development would consist of wall lighting, parking lot lighting, with non-glare fixtures, and some signage. Any glare that may occur would happen at night. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No safety hazards from lighting would occur. The proposed landscaping along Lind Avenue and SW 34th Street could be designed to minimize glare from headlights on adjacent properties. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? . None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any: All outdoor lighting would be shielded and directed downward or upward so as to minimize potential intrusion on neighboring properties. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Act Ill Theater Complex on nearby site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant,if any: None. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on,or proposed for,national,state,or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. None. 8 SEPA Rules To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation Agency Use Only b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological,scientific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Does not apply c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any: Does not apply 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site,and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans,if any. The proposed project is located on a vacant site that fronts Lind Avenue at the intersection of SW 34th Street(SE corner). The East Valley Freeway (SR 167) parallels East Valley Road and is two blocks to the east. The closest freeway interchange is located at SW 41st Street where freeway southbound on-and off- ramps are available. Northbound on-and off-ramps for SR 167 are located at SW 43rd Street. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The site is not currently serviced by public transit. Route 155, which provides service to and from the Southcenter shopping mall, is the closet public transit line to the project site. The closet bus stop to the site is several blocks to the south at SW 43rd and East Valley Road. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 24 stalls- none eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private). Sidewalks will be installed along the project frontage on Lind Avenue and SW 34th Street. e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water,rail,or air transportation? If so,generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 16 employee = 30-40 customer trips-generally 7-9a.m. and 3-5 p.m., please see enclosed report by the Transpo Group. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Impact Fees. The City of Renton has recently adopted an Impact Fee Program. As mitigation for a project's impact to the area transportation system, the City of Renton requires an impact fee to help fund future capacity improvements within the City. Local Off-Site Improvements. No local off-site improvements are recommended. Since the project does not degrade the level of service at any study area intersection for 1996 conditions, specific roadway improvements are not required. Frontage Improvements. Sidewalks will be provided along Lind Avenue and SW 34th Street. 9 . • I SEPA Rules To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation Agency Use Only Transportation Management. Sidewalks will be provided along Lind Avenue and SW 34th Street consistent with City of Renton requirements. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example:fire protection, police protection,health care,schools,other)? If so,generally describe. No, however, the new development would require police and fire department services, as with similar type developments. The impact on schools and health services would be minimal since most new employees are expected to be hired from the local labor pool. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any. Does not apply. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity,natural gas,water,refuse service, telephone,sanitary sewer,septic system,other. • b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utilities providing the service,and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Sewer: City of Renton Telephone: GTE NW Water: City of Renton Refuse service: Waste Management Power: Puget Sound Power and Light C. SIGNATURE I,the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Signature: Name Printed: Barton G. Treece, Jr., P. E. Date Submitted: I ?,p e 10 , 1 � r �?P"I!Illllll�llllllllDlllu,l ��'' `�''� `� I��I g�P1- B-twelve Associates, Inc. • December 5, 1996 Mr. Peter Powell r i Powell Development Company 737 Market Street Kirkland, Washington 98033 RE: Orillia Lot#8 - Wetland Determination B-twelve Job#96-174 Dear Peter, This letter describes our findings in regards to jurisdictional wetlands on your property known as Lot#8, located on the east side of Lind Avenue, in the City of Renton, Washington (the "site" see Exhibit A). Specifically, the site is a 4.173 acre irregularly shaped parcel of land with Lind Avenue bordering the west side of the site, Burlington Northern rail spurs along the south and east side of the site, and a commercial property along the north side of the site. • METHODS On October 15 and November 25, 1996, I inspected the site to determine if any jurisdictional wetlands exist(ed) on your property. A combination of field indicators (including vegetation, soils, and hydrology) were used to determine the presence of a wetland. Soil colors were identified using the 1990 Edited and Revised edition of the Munsell Soil Color Charts (Kollmorgen Instruments Corp. 1990). The site was inspected using the methodology described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Dept. of the Army, 1987). This is the methodology recognized by the US Army Corps of Engineers and the City of Renton for wetland determinations,ns-tEVE and delineations at the time of our field work. EXISTING DOCUMENTATION JAN 2 0 1997 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Prior to visiting the site, a review of several natural resource inventory maps was CITY OF RENTON conducted. Resources reviewed included the King County Soil Survey (Snyder et al. 1973-see Exhibit B), the National Wetlands Inventory Map (see Exhibit C) and the City of Renton Critical Areas Inventory (see Exhibit D). • 1103 West Meeker Street, Suite C • Kent,WA 98032-5751 • (206) 859-0515 • Fax (206) 852-4732 Powell-Lot#8/#96-174 B-twelve Associates, Inc. December 5, 1996 Page 2 According to the Soil Survey for King County Area, Washington (Snyder et al. 1973), the entire site is mapped as containing Snohomish series (So) soils (see Exhibit B). Snohomish soils are a poorly drained silt loam formed in alluvium and are considered hydric soils according to the publication Hydric Soils of the United States (USDA NTCHS Pub No.1491, 1991). However, the entire site was filled in 1974, burying the mapped Snohomish series under gravelly fill. Additional fill was placed on the site in 1982/83 by the owner at that time (Burlington Northern Railroad). Soil pits excavated throughout the site reveal gravelly fill material with various colors and textures. Review of Terra Associates, Inc. Geotethnical report prepared for the site and dated 2- 9-96, indicates that there is approximately 5 feet of compacted (preloaded) fill material over the native soils. The Terra report also indicates that the groundwater level on the site was generally at a depth of 7 feet below existing grades. Data collection for the King County Soil Survey was conducted between 1966-1969. The Survey states that the mapping and documentation represents conditions in 1969. Since the filling took place after 1969, this unit of fill missed being mapped as Urban soils (Ur) as were.other areas filled prior to 1969. Urban soils are not considered hydric soils. Additionally, a recent interpretation by the US Army Corps of Engineers in 1995 results in the Corps not regulating wetlands formed in legally placed fill material in the valley. According to the NWI map for the site, there are no wetlands or streams on or near the site (see Exhibit C). According to the City of Renton Wetland Inventory, there are two (2) small areas of wetland located near the west side of this property (see Exhibit D). According to the inventory sheets, these wetlands are described as Reference No. W-33, and, are isolated emergent wetlands located on fill. These wetlands are described as vegetated with bentgrass (Agrostis spp.) and "grasses". It should be noted that this inventory was comprised using aerial photographs and a "windshield survey" in 1991. Therefore, other than looking from the road at the site, a thorough on-site inspection of the areas designated as wetlands was not conducted for this inventory. • OBSERVATIONS The site is vegetated with a mix of colonizing grasses and forbs. It appears that the site is mowed on a regular basis, allowing the low growing bentgrass to remain dominant. Other species found in abundance on the site include cat's ear (Hypochaeris radicata), red clover (Trifolium pratense) and English plantain (Plantago lanceolata). Powell-Lot#8/If96-174 B-nvelve Associates, Inc. December 5, 1996 Page 3 Soils on the site consist of a compact, gravelly, sandy fill material >20" in depth. During our October 15 site visit the entire site was dry with no evidence of wetland hydrology. During our November 25, 1996 site visit, several areas of ponding were observed on the compact fill where the recent heavy snow had melted. However, these observations were taken outside of the growing season and do not appear indicative of growing season hydrology. Additionally, these areas were dominated by cat's ear, a non-hydrophytic species. In conclusion, several areas of facultative wetland vegetation (bentgrass) were observed on the site. However, as our attached data sheets indicate, the entire site has been filled and, other than during heavy periods of precipitation outside of the growing season, we have not observed any water on the site As a result, we have concluded that no wetlands are present on the site. If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me at (206) 859-0515. Sincerely, • ' • • . B-twelve Associates, Inc. rd Wetia d1%1 Ed Sewall t Senior Wetland Ecologist �� 000212 0��o G, File:Ed/9617401.doc ',Wetland +�~ • it • II • EXHIBIT A.• - -rq -- --- -- 350.47' " - ---- 40', .#,.;.;.;'.•;.•:.:•••* 6.I i9�:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:'•::•::•:•::•.•:•:•::•:•:•:':•t?�*::•:•:•.•:•.•:•:•:•:• ::. ; 0 :I:::::::::: •:•: ••:•:•: K54 :TI : Ik:it: 3t1kC;tt' ...•..'..'..': '• A LC :: z�. I::::::::iiiiiiiiiiiiii:::::::::::::::iiiiiiiiiii......::::::::::::Pii:....... •'•' • '....::::::::•::::....:**:;:::::::i::::.::::: : ::::::::: i'.. , gI I •et}.,:::::::::: 1151•27E:::::::::::::::.*:*i::::::*;:::::::::::::::::/1:. ‘ I 1 F N W - Q1 fi:•::::::::::::.:::::::: ::: :..0.•::::::: ::::::::::::::::::#.•Xn:::::::•ii:i::::•::::::.q.::::: :!"...r).•::::::::::0::. - 2 0 T 0 :;: :: ::.::::: :::}v: : :'.3'::: • :K':::'r::r:ti:::::: : :•:•'•:•:•'r::•:• : v� 0 Fes--Z ::: :ti: 'rr: r Z j :: > Ci 1 : *. 1 I a 10' l co .I Itt ,51 :: :: I I06g1,5 r' ,,I4 EXISTING R.R. TRACK tl 1• ,� ;= '� .83.38' iii- -'—* �' -4 9.17-'--i--1-N 8 T°50'4T�' W -p ------ r 1..—.20—RAILROAD _;.ESM TO __ 1 1 R=16p5,8T�T,-_ .. —•-- I CREATED BY THIS DOCUMENT. I :L = 110.23'-' I 20' UTILITY ESM'T. TO BE tet,"1 v CREATED BY RECORDING OF I THIS DOCUMENT. I na � d UI�1��plliU" i 1 i �_. �1 NORTH B-twelve Associates,Inc. _'��t �•\ I= ' lip Fcolc gicaI Systems Design Rr Management , L. 1103 W.Meeker St.•Suite.C • Kent,OVA 98032 (206)859-0515 fax(206)852-4732 Job# : 96-/?1 . Date: /z--f-96 POWELL DEVELOPMENT CO. Drawn by: £srs Scale: e it-,fob' LOT#8 Revised: Checked by: CITY OF RENT ON, WA . 1 . - . EXHIBIT B• Soils Map Base map per Soil SutTey, King county Area Washington, (Snyder et al. 1973). • . " IlVtrack I:t1 •L 1.' : : 2' \ '•\:_ V. :-...:iitii-N, i•, .... ,... • j. •41.4.i ja 1 T :— C-- 1, ...,1? + 's-. • ?ri Ng ___.- - - ------. II i 1..,,,I • ' \tie. L-1, „ s i- , , .., ai —.,- ', ..,. '.••'• `;-',!., c' kt: !i: .1'...• <LY i . . M. iil lk; \:;:i1:,:.•1---.) T, t I / PI/ , . . . • .::.. . •.---7- wo • - , . .. NA I vo ' I A N.:. • I ' . ... . i : - -7•- • i i • • 25 . . v. • • -7---'-577 — 7. 3° :\41fij3.6 To: l9. , . t•y ._ E. . Y.1 . • • 4;•: sh ., •-. _... ' 1 .e,...., 1 0 Wo . ... • i. Ur . . • 1 •: t• i . • .. • • ..!,-it, . '• ::%. .•• .;,..: ik .. i,.,0,, ,x,,,. 1 11 ' il'. • . • . • . i ti. ' .4i4;,,, ' •• .4-i, • - .'4 :',.4 .Pij p 41'..'-t-,& lk- 1 ;# - i, 1.r.'1••=•,-.,fr: 1 . ,:s;), .. ..-'• • -.. . .:...!':. .1; .. .."1 ...'-'s, .!?. . ,,., -- P kf '. . i\ ' ,•:, • 4:.ti, , , ,..:,,.. 10,... 1 ._._ ... . ..:. __...._ ._. • • .•4.1, _ • - ., ., . ir.. ..• _...._;i-_-. ... „ii,....k%:.-,,, .01 I ir__ . .. ..k.;;.: :. •:,- i; ri. p-if , ,' ,. ..-e• 0,117 4.„' A . ji----- i : WO .' /.'..' ' ..".. .. ! . -1.. . :r.• 1 _ . • •- • i• . . •. . 4. i .L..,. . II' . • • . 48 . - A. l''. , •• /1 . 1 '• ••,. `,. ';i4,1,;•,4e) ., 411 . .• ' : . ,v_1 r ,:_ .411... : . .i'•-cl; -1. ::' I ...A 6, . ' r 7"-.---- #•, • ---, , ..- ...,1 , ,• ;,, ,, ,, . — ..: :;:rs.0.)': •. -,o1 " •iii,1 :... . _ .t__:y__>,, 0 • ,-,„,11. — %. i --,-1 • . ).. , Ng p s ii 3. tit . ul t• •N . ' f 4 ...._......45----- . .. '. • : 'f.4: ! ,. , I. • I. • ' . T. '':., ; '' . . % , '. ria II .. ., .11 , • / - 'N • •;;•,i.',:: •-• •• ... - • • .- .1 '3*. tin • . 11\1 Of ilk. a .. .• - : . .. '' •''. t il,-,§ -- 77-_. „i. 7.1.,•-• . 1 d .--' -'-'.----Tf : w. . , i • . • ;id .• . • 44 ' k----- -_-.-,... C NORTII _.•••=to 17)rA'-u'a.'.% .;--5-.•- .1/7.' B-twelve Associates,Inc. --,---_. ------ - .45517 ...,•:r rtcolngicr+1 Systems Design &Mnnagernent 1103 W.Meeker St,Suite.C • Kent,WA 98032 (206)859-0515 rax(206)852-4732 • JOb# : qi.(74 • Date: 12 - it —74 POlVELL DEVELOPMENT CO. Drawn by:Lies Scale:jr Loot.' LOT#8 Revised: Checked by: CITY OF RENTON, WA - I • j r , EXHIBI i C: National Wetlands Inventory Map "ti P55C •-" - I n ` 1 ' r F1'-`I 1 PfOG q] F, ' PFOC x _I• i' lift 1!i 11 1f tT / 1/ • J ' 1 lE } H PEMC EM PSSC I \ 1 -�- !I" 1 I PSSc SITE ' " S"... j;t).; li! • ' .. • . J. • d 1 ' e�tMa1 „I 1 I 1'4 •\ ..?Mc / 1 •: I II PEMC / 1 I ;, ..ti: . q + 11 j t I .. . I. . -ci.I S.. ,II4i liiii..? s' .,.• 4' .T PEMC ', p55Cx', .i —• •! Jr :ief/ \;rr 1 f.,'. .".41).t. ,\. PEMC till.rrii3O. ' •• , ' 1 ( :SSCt� PEN\ r /' "PEMC- I I I li .. Qi-... \\. 1 ::.1.:1I I II°! i t DENC PEM C ! F T. MC i1 . `I t I y PEMtx i \ . ! 1 I • i�# 11 • • NORTH �41 B-twelve Associates,Inc. �" y ..- , AIM quadrangle: C 37 ® -- - Ecotogicnl Systems Design& Mnnngement Mapping Date: 1103 W.Meeker Si.. Suite.C • Kent,WA 98032 (206)859-0515 Fax(206)852-4732 i Job# . 9k f74 • Date: ti - '- 9G POWELL DEVELOPMENT CO. Drawn by: F'"S Scale: f."'•z 000- LOT#8 1 Revised: Checked by: CITY OT RENTON, WA • EXHIBIT D: . • CITY OF IRENI.ON CRITICAL AREAS INVENTORY WETLANDS AND STREAM CORILDORS • �`_ _- -_ lam- a P. w-14 .� -1 SITE go itki l• : w— z2 i' —32 % . • LF.CENL / • -_. M S-1 .Stre ams W-1 .-Wclhnd s C = S -e __ a _- X SW 43d St , , 2 tr' \_._.. • • • l',hle 1 Continual 110 CN.M, I....-.n till W.1. D.n... I1....nl 04 lu.. 11A.01011/4 0...1 N. Ss.. Kw Ions UN. 1w.• A., Sq.t.l" 14011...S.. 5..•,.., town 0.... lw.- G..w.0 W.11 Ao.I Iw+n r.SP vl. v , mum -. A11111%......TOIT.. 1.. .W..n. I.a...e W.W.I 1. On St......n...n...n W35 „� ... 1w1.1...., .'-L N.....w.•. 1.. 11. 1,14 Ile Y, ..w..•e. err •1 'VIA w. 1.�. I......,. a .... an ..u' . 1 • �.I.r.a AR...Aln..lr....l..ns..,... - --__ I'�I.4I:IIII • III 1 PI NORTH B-twelve Associates,Inc. �`11 " ll= . iiiiiii'P Ecological Systems Design &Management 1103 NV.Meeker St..Suite.C • Kent,WA 98032 (206)8590515 Fax(206)852-4732 Job# : 96-/?-'4. Date: i2 -it'fG POWELL DEVELOPMENT CO. Drawn by: J4 Scale: /"= moo'_ LOT#l8 Revised: Checked.by: CITY OFRENTON, WA WETLAND DETEItMINATION DATA FORI\I (US Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, January 1987) 13-TWELVE.ASSOCIATES, INC. Project: . P,„// L,/ 8 Job//: gd- /y 4 Investigator: Ed Sewall Date: /1- ZS-/6 Jurisdiction: State: Sample Point I!: UPI// Wetland: Atypical areas analysis: his dd • • Problem areas analysis: n'o VEGETATION Dominant plant species Stratum Indicator Coverage % I. /) rea/2 s� . // T4 C. Is 2. 7�x/'r r, /Ir„d..-ct, 3. t 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. % of species OBL, FACW and/or FAC: 5U Nydrophytic vegetation criteria met: Yes No(Marginal) Comments: SOILS Mapped Soil Series: SN..) -s On I-Iydric Soils List?:(fei No Drainage Class: rip Depth(0 in) Matrix color Mottle color Text e /6 in. /DYrZ 3/3 — T -1 L 7s . � I;-!) in. in. • • in. • Indicators present: histosol, histic epipedon, sulfidic odor,_ayuic moisture regime, reducing conditions, gleying,_concretions,_hi h surficial organic content, organic streaking, mottling Ilydric soil criteria met: Yes N ) Basis: Comments: w,cr F.1/e! '%•-• fe.r 17 7d s ,+ Qp HYDROLOGY Inundated: Y/65 Depth of Standing water: Saturated: YIN) Depth to saturated soil: Indicators present:_inundated, saturated upper 12",_water tnarks,_drift lines, sediment deposits drainage patterns,_oxidized rhizos heres,_water stained leaves Wetland hydrology criteria met: Yes PO Basis: O n S Comments: . SUMMARY OF CRITERIA Ilydrophytic vegetation: Y/N 7 I lydric soils: Y1t Wetlat d hydrology: XLI\J:) Data point meets the criteria of a jurisdictional wetland?: Yes o COMMENTS: 1 ik:cdlla,aR7.doc • • J WETLAND 1)ETEIt1\'IINA'I'ION DATA FOItI\I • (US flinty Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, January 1987) 13-71VEL VE ASSOCIATES, INC. Project: • ""e/( L.r'' 8 Johft: 9G-/7-1 Investigator: Ed Sewall Date: //- 25 —14 Jurisdiction: /z�-/-� State: Sample Point #: DP# 2-- Wetland: Atypical areas analysis:_ y is /% Problem areas analysis: Na • • VEGETATION Dominant plant species Stratum Indicator Coverage % 1. Ar /f - N /:%/1C 2. /743.Aloc/trttt&s ho/' 4, H FA( V3 3. • 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. • 14. • 15. % of species OBL, FACW and/or FAC: 5 c� Hydrophilic vegetation criteria,net: Yes No( Marginal) • Comments: SOILS Mapped Soil Series: .�rvoltnts� On Ilydric Soils List?(Yes-)No Drainage Class: �� • Depth(0 in) Matrix color Mottle colrr Texture /6 in. /6Y/2- 3/4 ed �.-,�Q /. JJ in. in. in. • Indicators present:_Itistosol, histic epipedon,_sulfidic odor, acluic moisture regime, reducing conditions, gleying,_concretions, hi surficial organic content, organic streaking, _mottling Hydric soil criteria Ind: Yes 9� Basis: . • r. t* 0, Comments: 1-As V. 4cJ� ,'-. 5 —r) s Fri 11Y1)ROLOGI( Inundated: Y1) Depth of Standing water: Saturated: YEL) Depth to saturated soil: Indicators present:_inundated, saturated upper 12", water marks, drift lines,_seditnent deposits• • _drainage patterns,_oxidized rhizos h res, water stained leaves Wetland hydrology criteria met: Yes o ' Basis: (N O r ti.�x= J . Comments: SUMMARY OF CRITERIA Ilydrophylic vegetation: Y/N Ilydric soils: Y/(1) Wejland hydrology: Yk1) Data point meets the criteria of a jurisdictional wetland?: Yes( 1 COMMENTS: t ac:�a'aataR7.doc • WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORT I (US Array Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, January 1987) II-TWELVE ASSOCIATES, INC. Project: . Y o,,.�t,I( Lo I it 8 JohN:q4-i 74 Investigator: Ed Sewall Date: // 25- 9G Jurisdiction: /ze,b--� State: 1--4. Sample Point N: DP#3 Wetland: Atypical areas analysis: o id f: J) . Problem areas analysis: ivo VEGETATION Dominant plant species Stratum indicator Coverage % 1. 6 s/;s -1;72 /- r-AC 2. !'7ew/rq21 /ait-«-/c./�.. H I-4C.•- 3. fivacl,-.e,:t 4. " 5. • 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. • 11. 12. • 13. 14. — 15. % of species OBL, FACW and/or FAC: Ilydrophytic vegetation criteria,net Ye No Marginal • Comments: { f'c ..5(.v c,r3 SOILS Mapped Soil Series: On Hydric Soils List?: fa No Drainage Class: Depth(0 in) Matrix color Mottle color 'I'extu /b in. 2 -5 / 3/3 1 r:,�.� s... ,{ 41/ in. in. . Indicators present: histosol, histic epipedon, sulfidic odor,_aquic moisture regime,_reducing conditions, gleying,_concretions, high surficial organic content, organic streaking, mottling Ilydric soil criteria met: Yes NO Basis: r o ,►, r...te . Comments: o// f 1/ /%cP ,' ' 76 c r. g 0 ‘r• • IiYDROLO Y, Inundated: YEN,Depth of Standing water: Saturated: Y/.f.? Depth to saturated soil: Indicators present:_inundated,_saturated upper 12", water mat ks,_drift lines,_sediment deposits drainage patterns,_oxidized rhizospheres,_water stained leaves Wetland hydrology criteria met: Yes(No) Basis: ,^•'o e•-ja �1 Comments: SUMMARY OF CRITERIA Hydrophytic vegetation:d3/N .I lydric soils: Y(1D Wytlatld hydrology: Y AU Data point meets the criteria of a jurisdictional wetland?: Ye. Ns' • COMMENTS: t•ik:cdldataR7.doc ti WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM (US Anny Corps of Enginee►s Wetlands Delineation Manual, January 1987) I3-TWELVE ASSOCIA '7LS, INC. Project: •re....0, L4 16-8 Jou: 96•/1 i Investigator: Ed Sewall Date: /I-2S-16 Jurisdiction: TT�, FA-� State: L'l Sample Point //: DP# 4- Wetland: Atypical areas analysis: Problem areas analysis: VEGETATION Dominant plant/� species n Stratum Indicator Coverage % 1. / oc/f�.N,j !'-•�!', rq.f / /1l�(i 2. /l,cis:}= 5/0p- •r) 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12.13. 14. 15. v of species OBL, FACW and/or FAC: Njdrophytic vegetation criteria met: Yes No Marginal)__ Comments: SOI.LS Mapped Soil Series: T^''1^a'iS On Ilydric Soils List?Cl`.,e1 No Drainage Class: P-U Depth(0 in) • Matrix color Mottle color , Texlpre G in. /041z 37�_. "^-1 r,r. y S v�P•) / in.in. . in.Indicators present: histosol, histic epipedon, sulfidic odor, aquic moisture regime,_reducing conditions, gleying,_concretions, high surficial organic content, organic streaking, mottling Ilydric soil criteria met: Yes Nb) Basis: C. I - ,k: Comments: old {;I1 tert,..1 „col e ,-1 ', ?O:r �.,• ! r T Fe) , IHYDROL9flY . lnundateda Depth of Standing water: / Saturated: PN Depth to saturated soil: 5 Indicators present: inundated, saturated upper 12", water marks, drift lines,_sediment deposits drainage patterns, oxidized rhizospheres, water stained leaves Wetland hydrology criteria met: Yes No z Basis: fee u rf iy u r �1%4 s'i't J �;.,.••� /Ice Comments: iva-k. I SUMMARY OF CRITERIA 7 Ilydrophytic vegetation: YIN) Ilydric soils: Y/IS1.) Wetlntul hydrology: Y/N • Data point meets the criteria of a jurisdictional n•etland?: Yes(No�� COMMENTS: r•nk:ca,da*sezaoc • 01.2t);fl7 10:55 FAX 206 7147 3688 :R:1NS?[) C,rouF' d0n2 Transporta Nor and%thefrryu,:c PIA NNING • D(SI3N • The Trarispo Group January 20, 1997 TG: 95240.00 Mr_ Bart Treece Treece &Company 320 2nd Avenue S, Suite 200 Kirkland,WA 98033 SUBJECT: TRAFFIC-RELATED ISSUES FOR THE RENTON U.S. RENTALS FACILITY Dear Bart, This letter presents the traffic-related issues for the proposed U.S. Rentals facility located on the southeast corner of the Lind Avenue SW/SW 34th Street Intersection. As discussed at the City of Renton's pre-submittal conference. trip generation and distribution estimates are required. The following letter discusses each of these issues. Project Description The proposed U.S. Rentals facility would be located on the vacant 4.172 acre site on the • southeast corner of the Lind Avenue SW/SW 34th Street intersection. The proposed use of the property would be an equipment rental facility for U.S. Rentals and would consist of an 11,990 square foot(s0 building. The facility would have 16 employees and operate from 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., seven days per week. Access for the site would be provided by two driveways on Lind Avenue SW and one driveway on SW 34th Street. Trip Generation Trip generation estimates are typically based on the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (1TE) 'Dip Generation Manual, 5th Edition, 1991. However,no specific trip generation data is available in T}tp Generation Manual for this type of facility. For purposes of estimating trips generation for the proposed U.S. Rentals facility, the most similar use in ITE's Trip Generation Manual comes from light industrial uses. as described in the 71-ip Generation Manual. Since the proposed U.S. Rentals facility operates most s1rntlArly to light industrial facilities. the trip generation was estimated using the trip rate for Land Use 110 (6.97 daily trips/1,000 sf of gross floor area). Assuming 11,990 sf of gross floor area, 84 daily trips were estimated for the proposed U.S. Rentals facility. During the PM peak hour. approximately 12 trips would occur at the site (1 In, 11 out), based on a PM peak hour trip rate of 0.98 trips per 1,000 sf of gross floor area. RECEIVED JA4 7 0 1997 UEV OITY VIEN OF R8'N ON KANNIt�G The TRANSPO Group.tnc 14315 N.F.24th Street.Suite 23: 3ellerue,Wasl:ingren 95007 FAX.206i/47.3688 206/641.3881 01/20/97 10:55 FAX 206 747 3688 TRANSPO Group a003 Mr, Bart Treece The January 20, 1997 Transpo Page 2 Group Trip Distribution The distribution of trips to and from the proposed U.S. Rentals facility would occur primarily to and from SR 167. Trips from SR 167 would likely travel westbound on SW 41st Street and northbound on Lind Avenue SW to the site. Trips to SR 167 from the site would likely travel eastbound on SW 34th Street and southbound on E Valley Road to SR 167. As a result, few site trips would impact the Lind Avenue SW/SW 34th Street intersection. • Please give me a call at 641-3881 if you have any questions. Sincerely. • The TRANSPO Group. Inc. � r Jeff L. Schramm Transportation Engineer JLS/ils M19819624019024012 • • PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS FOR U.S. RENTALS CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON U. 4. Al c* W ioNAL MI 9-9-97 JAN 2 0 R997 Treece & Company oays, H�,�w 320 d WA 98033 R Ave. South, Suite 200 ciryo� �o�Nll Kirkland, Phone: (206) 822-2577 FAX: (206) 822-8758 January 17, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Technical Information Report Worksheet ii Introduction 1 Summary of Results 2 Basin Summaries 3 Runoff Curve Number and Time of Concentration 7 Detention Pond Design Data 10 Water Quality 18 Drainage Area Map 23 Page 1 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PART 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PART 2 PROJECT I..00ATION PROJECT ENGINEER AND DESCRIPTION Project Owner V. 5• -'`1T t-5 Project Name 0.S , ear-t-rik�.- Address Location Phone (9 I le) `I88- ?eV 9 Township 2 3 r4 Project Engineer 13 A2T f e�EcE Range 5- E Company T2EEC E 4 C o, Section 30 Address Phone me SC`o�� a"e. S, � "6 1" Project Size y//7 AC (30(o) SZZ-z577 98033 Upstream Drainage Basin Size AC • PART 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION PART 4 OTHER PERMITS ' I Subdivision I I DOF/G HPA I I Shoreline Management I I Short Subdivision I I COE 404 I I Rockery I I Grading I I DOE Dam Safety I Structural Vaults RI Commercial I I FEMA Floodplain I I Other I I Other I I COE Wetlands 11 HPA PART 5 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN • • Community Drainage Basin St'rziti1G Et,Ro0< GEEEIC --to- G(2._EEt-1 I?1klz,, PART 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS y., 0 River I I Floodplain 0 Stream I ] Wetlands I I Critical Stream Reach I 1 Seeps/Springs I I Depressions/Swales 0 High Groundwater Table 0 Lake I I Groundwater Recharge 0 Steep Slopes 0 Other 0 Lakeside/Erosion Hazard PART 7 SOILS Soil Type Slopes Erosion Potential Erosive Velocities Fill 0 - Z 90 S\15t,.,l d b vNovne_ — I I Additional Sheets Attatched � � 1/90 • Page 2 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET *ART 0 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT I I Ch.4-Downstream Analysis I I ll Il Il 0 Additional Sheets Attatched PART 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS- MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION ill Sedimentation Facilities ® Stabilize Exposed Surface Stabilized Construction Entrance En Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities Perimeter Runoff Control ® Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris Clearing and Grading Restrictions g Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities Cover Practices I I Flag Limits of NGPES lin Construction Sequence I I Other I I Other •ART 10 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM • NV Grass Lined Channel I Tank Cl Infiltration Method of Analysis ® Pipe System Cl Vault I I Depression S r3u H I I Open Channel CI Energy Dissapator n Flow Dispersal . Compensation/Mitigation Dry Pond LI Wetland (i Waiver of Eliminated Site Storage avi Wet Pond I I Stream I I Regional Detention Brief Description of System Operation Sheep 'CIc i a�( ?a,/L I sc., Cc-ce s 4-0 vvsS s,,),„,tes -->� Cow.bo R/7 - 1. cAty tDuakilt( P6v.d+ —►- L' 4. Facility Related Site Limitations I-1 Additional Sheets Attatched Reference Facility Limitation PART 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PART 12 EASEMENTS/TRACTS (May require special structural review) I_J Drainage Easement Cast in Place Vault CI Other I I Access Easement I I Retaining Wall I I Native Growth Protection Easement I= Rockery>4'High I I Tract Structural on Steep Slope Other ,*ART 14 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I13r a civil engineer under my supervision have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attatchments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate. sbneft f • • I . INTRODUCTION The following preliminary design report presents the conceptual design of the stormwater control facilities for the proposed 4.17 acre U.S. Rentals site at the intersection of Lind Ave. and SW 34th St. The information contained within this report is preliminary in nature and not intended for use in constructing the described facilities, but rather for the use of the City of Renton staff for during the site plan review process. Construction of the described facilities will be preceded by the preparation, review and approval of construction plan and detail drawings accompanied by a Final Drainage Report to include conveyance calculations. Existing Drainage Conditions The project site is currently a vacant parcel (Lot 8 of Burlington Northern Binding Site Plan). The parcel was filled approximately 18 years ago. The existing ground cover consists of mainly pasture grass in poor condition.• The site is extremely flat with several shallow depressions. A 30 foot wide railroad easement borders the east side of the site. This railroad line has ditches on either side of the tracks which collect runoff from a portion of the site. The general overall slope is from east to west at an average slope of 0.2 percent. The site has two storm drainage stubs available, one on each frontage road. 9 9 However, neither is currently receiving runoff from the site. The east and south sides of the site have been or are under development and will intercept any-surface flow from upstream areas. Proposed Drainage Conditions Runoff from parking, equipment and material storage, landscaping and roof areas will be conveyed via sheet flow to perimeter biofiltration swales. These perimeter swales convey the treated water to a combination detention/water quality pond located in the southern portion of the site. This pond will have 2-3 feet of dead storage to enhance water quality through settling of sediments prior to discharge from the site. A multi-orifice flow control structure is provided at the outlet from the pond. Post- detention peak outflows will be at or below the pre-developed peak runoff rates for the 2, 10 and 100 year storm events. The control structure outlet is connected to a 12 inch storm drainage stub near the midpoint of the west property line along Lind Avenue. This stubs connects with a 60 inch storm drain pipe along the west side of Lind Avenue. The 60 inch continues north to the Lind-SW 34th St. intersection and then turns west and continues down SW 34th St for approximately 1/4 mile until reaching Springbrook Creek. -1- Y\ ' I SUMMARY OF RESULTS PROPOSED DETENTION SYSTEM Total Area of Project Site 4 17 acres Post-Devel- Post- Design Detention Design Pre-Developed oped Pond Developed Water Storage Storm Peak Discharge Inflow Release Surface Volume (cfs) Rate Elevation (cfs) (cfs) (ft) (cf) W.Q. NA 0.45 0.26 13.53 243 2 0.45 1 .76 0.44 14.06 4575 10 0.91 2.68 0.89 14.44 7847 100 1 .47 3.69 1 .29 14.86 11747 -2- BASIN SUMMARIES -3- 1/2/97 1:22:34 pm Treece & Company US Rentals - Lind Ave. & SW 34th St. SBUH Hydrograph Analysis Preliminary R/D Sizing BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: DEV-002 NAME: POST-DEV 2-YEAR 24-HR STORM SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 4.17 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 1.95 inches AREA. . : 0.42 Acres 3.75 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN • 90.00 98.00 TC • 10.00 min 10.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 PEAK RATE: 1.76 cfs VOL: 0.58 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: DEV-002W NAME: POST-DEV WATER QUALITY STORM SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 4.17 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 0.65 inches AREA. . : 0.42 Acres 3.75 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN • 90.00 98.00 TC • 10.00 min 10.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 PEAK RATE: 0.44 cfs VOL: 0.15 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: DEV-010 NAME: POST-DEV 10-YEAR 24-HR STORM SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 4.17 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2.85 inches AREA. . : 0.42 Acres 3.75 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN • 90.00 98 .00 TC • 10.00 min 10.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 PEAK RATE: 2.67 cfs VOL: 0.88 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: DEV-100 NAME: POST-DEV 100-YEAR 24-HR STORM SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 4.17 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3.85 inches AREA. . : 0.42 Acres 3.75 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN • 90.00 98.00 TC • 10.00 min 10.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 PEAK RATE: 3.69 cfs VOL: 1.23 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min -4- 1/2/97 1:22:34 pm Treece & Company US Rentals - Lind Ave. & SW 34th St. SBUH Hydrograph Analysis Preliminary R/D Sizing BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: EX-002 NAME: PRE-DEV 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 4.17 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 1.95 inches AREA. . : 4.17 Acres 0.00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN • 88.00 0.00 TC • 60.00 min 0.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 PEAK RATE: 0.44 cfs VOL: 0.32 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min BASIN ID: EX-010 NAME: PRE-DEV 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 4.17 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2.•85 inches AREA. . : 4.17 Acres 0.00 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10.00 min CN • 88 .00 0.00 TC • 60.00 min 0.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 PEAK RATE: 0.91 cfs VOL: 0.59 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min BASIN ID: EX-100 NAME: PRE-DEV 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 4.17 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3.85 inches AREA. . : 4.17 Acres 0.00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN • 88.00 0.00 TC • 60.00 min 0.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 PEAK RATE: 1.47 cfs VOL: 0.90 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min -5- 1 . 1/2/97 1:22 :34 pm Treece & Company US Rentals - Lind Ave. & SW 34th St. SBUH Hydrograph Analysis Preliminary R/D Sizing HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY PEAK TIME VOLUME HYD RUNOFF OF OF Contrib NUM RATE PEAK HYDRO Area cfs min. cf\AcFt Acres 1 0.445 490 14004 cf 4.17 2 0.909 490 25513 cf 4.17 3 1.470 490 39205 cf 4.17 4 1.761 480 25082 cf 4.17 5 2.675 480 38466 cf 4.17 6 3 .685 480 53450 cf 4.17 7 0.445 480 6393 cf 4.17 14 0.442 550 25082 cf 4 .17 15 0.891 540 38491 cf 4.17 16 1.289 530 53453 cf 4.17 17 0.259 510 6394 cf 4.17 -6- RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER TIME OF CONCENTRATION -7- CURVE NUMBER SELECTION The fill soil was assumed to correspond to hydrologic soil group C. A Curve Number (CN) value of 88 was used for the pre-developed conditions. This was determined by taking an average of the "fair" and "good" conditions for open space and lawns. A CN value of 90 was chosen for the pervious areas in the post-developed condition. TIME OF CONCENTRATION A conservative time of concentration of 60 minutes was used for the pre-developed conditions. Due to the extremely flat topography with several small depressions, a typical calculation with a friction coefficient and slope is not appropriate. A post-developed To of 10 minutes has been used. The actual calculated To's for the east and west swale basin are slightly more than 10 minutes, thus the analysis predicts more conservative peak runoff rates and volumes for the post-developed condition. -8- KING COUNTY, WASIHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TABLE 3.5.2B SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS (Published by SCS in 1982) Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural, suburban and urban land use for Type 1A rainfall distribution, 24-hour storm duration. CURVE NUMBERS BY HYDROLOGIC S GROUP LAND USE DESCRIPTION A B C D Cultivated land(1): winter condition 86 91 94 95 Mountain open areas: low growing brush and grasslands 74 82 89 92 Meadow or pasture: 65 78 85 89 Wood or forest land: undisturbed 42 64 76 81 Wood or forest land: young second growth or brush 55 72 81 86 Orchard: with cover crop 81 88 92 94 Open spaces, lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, landscaping. �Qvert n�E good condition: grass cover on 75% or more of the area 68 80 86 90 fair condition: grass cover on 50% to 75% of the area 77 85 Q 92 Gravel roads and parking lots 76 85 89 91 Dirt roads and parking lots 72 82 87 _ 89 Impervious surfaces, pavement, roofs, etc. 98 98 98 98 Open water bodies: lakes, wetlands, ponds, etc. 100 100 100 Single Family Residential (2) Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre % Impervious (3) 1.0 DU/GA 15 Separate curve number 1.5 DU/GA 20 shall be selected 2.0 DU/GA 25 for pervious and 2.5 DU/GA • 30 Impervious portion 3.0 DU/GA 34 of the site or basin 3.5 DU/GA 38 4.0 DU/GA 42 4.5 DU/GA 46 5.0 DU/GA 48 5.5 DU/GA 50 6.0 DU/GA 52 6.5 DU/GA 54 7.0 DU/GA 56 Planned unit developments, % impervious condominiums, apartments, must be computed commercial business and industrial areas. (1) For a more detailed description of agricultural land use curve numbers refer to National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9,August 1972. (2) Assumes roof and driveway runoff Is directed into street/storm system. (3) The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good condition for these curve numbers. 3.5.2-3 1/90 DETENTION BASIN DESIGN DATA -10- 1/2/97 1:22:34 pm Treece & Company US Rentals - Lind Ave. & SW 34th St. SBUH Hydrograph Analysis Preliminary R/D Sizing STAGE STORAGE TABLE TRAPEZOIDAL BASIN ID No. SP-1 Description: DETENTION STORAGE POND Length: 155.00 ft. Width: 50.00 ft. Side Slope 1: 3 Side Slope 3: 3 Side Slope 2: 3 Side Slope 4: 3 Infiltration Rate: 0.00 min/inch STAGE <----STORAGE----, STAGE <----STORAGE----, STAGE <----STORAGE----, STAGE <----STORAGE----, (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- 13.50 0.0000 0.0000 13.90 3199 0.0734 14.30 6600 0.1515 14.70 10206 0.2343 13.60 781.16 0.0179 14.00 4030 0.0925 14.40 7482 0.1718 14.80 11141 0.2558 13.70 1575 0.0362 14.10 4874 0.1119 14.50 8377 0.1923 14.90 12088 0.2775 13.80 2381 0.0547 14.20 5730 0.1316 14.60 9265 0.2132 15.00 13049 0.2996 -1 1- 1/2/97 1:22 :34 pm Treece & Company US Rentals - Lind Ave. & SW 34th St. SBUH Hydrograph Analysis Preliminary R/D Sizing STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE COMBINATION DISCHARGE ID No. DC-1 Description: COMBO DISCHARGE #1 Structure: DO-1 Structure: DOW-1 Structure: DNW-1 Structure: Structure: DR-1 STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE c--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs 13.25 0.0000 14.00 0.4245 14.80 1.1588 15.60 10.893 13.30 0.1096 14.10 0.4519 14.90 1.3621 15.70 13.026 13.40 0.1898 14.20 0.6714 15.00 1.6198 15.80 15.581 13.50 0.2451 14.30 0.7761 15.10 2.3755 15.90 18.529 13.60 0.2900 14.40 0.8610 15.20 3.5405 16.00 21.860 13.70 0.3288 14.50 0.9353 15.30 4.9746 13.80 0.3635 14.60 1.0025 15.40 6.6249 13.90 0.3952 14.70 1.0645 15.50 8.4600 -12- 1/2/97 1:22:34 pm Treece & Company US Rentals - Lind Ave. & SW 34th St. SBUH Hydrograph Analysis Preliminary R/D Sizing STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE NOTCH WEIR ID No. DNW-1 Description: NOTCH WEIR ON 18" RISER Weir Length: 1.0000 ft. Weir height (p) : 5.5000 ft. Elevation 14.75 ft. Weir Increm: 0.10 STAGE c--DISCHARGE---> STAGE c--DISCHARGE---> STAGE c--DISCHARGE---> STAGE c--DISCHARGE---> (ft) ---cfe (ft) ---cfe (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs 14.75 0.0000 15.10 0.6346 15.50 1.8355 15.90 3.1846 14.80 0.0362 15.20 0.9073 15.60 2.1671 16.00 3.5228 14.90 0.1849 15.30 1.2016 15.70 2.5044 15.00 0.3905 15.40 1.5124 15.80 2.8444 -13- 1/2/97 1:22:34 pm Treece & Company US Rentals - Lind Ave. & SW 34th St. SBUH Hydrograph Analysis Preliminary R/D Sizing STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. DO-1 Description: MULTIPLE ORIFICE DISCHARGE Outlet Elev: 13.25 Elev: 11.25 ft Orifice Diameter: 4 .2500 in. Elev: 14.10 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 4.7500 in. STAGE <--DISCHARGE---, STAGE <--DISCHARGE---, STAGE <--DISCHARGE---, STAGE <--DISCHARGE---, (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfe (ft) ---cf© 13.25 0.0000 14.00 0.4245 14.80 1.1225 15.60 1.5013 13.30 0.1096 14.10 0.4519 14.90 1.1773 15.70 1.5417 13.40 0.1898 14.20 0.6714 15.00 1.2293 15.80 1.5810 13.50 0.2451 14.30 0.7761 15.10 1.2790 15.90 1.6194 13.60 0.2900 14.40 0.8610 15.20 1.3266 16.00 1.6568 13.70 0.3288 14.50 0.9353 15.30 1.3725 13.80 0.3635 14.60 1.0025 15.40 1.4168 13.90 0.3952 14.70 1.0645 15.50 1.4597 -14- 1/2/97 1:22:34 pm Treece & Company US Rentals - Lind Ave. & SW 34th St. SBUH Hydrograph Analysis Preliminary R/D Sizing STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE BROAD CRESTED WEIR ID No. DOW-1 Description: EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SPILLWAY cd: 3.2100 Weir length: 6 .0000 ft. El: 15.50 ft. Weir Increm: 0.10 STAGE c--DISCHARGE---> STAGE c--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs ------ c ========vy=v C6 ====c-==-e- 15.50 0.0000 15.70 1.8605 15.90 5.652016.00 8.1713 15.60 0.6334 15.80 3.5445 16.00 8.1713 • • -15- 1/2/97 1:22:34 pm Treece & Company US Rentals - Lind Ave. & SW 34th St. SBUH Hydrograph Analysis Preliminary R/D Sizing STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE RISER DISCHARGE ID No. DR-1 Description: 18" CMP OVERFLOW RISER Riser Diameter (in) : 18.00 elev: 15.00 ft Weir Coefficient. . . : 9.739 height: 16 .00 ft Orif Coefficient. . . : 3.782 increm: 0.10 ft STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> (ft) ---cfe (ft) ---cfe (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfe 15.00 0.0000 15.20 1.3066 15.50 5.1649 15.80 7.6111 15.00 0.0000 15.30 2.4004 15.60 6.5914 15.90 8.0728 15.10 0.4620 15.40 3.6957 15.70 7.1196 16.00 8.5095 -16- 1/2/97 1:22:35 pm Treece & Company US Rentals - Lind Ave. & SW 34th St. SBUH Hydrograph Analysis Preliminary R/D Sizing LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- <-PEAK-> STORAGE DESCRIPTION > (cfs) (cfs) --id- --id- <-STAGE> id VOL (cf) 2-YEAR, 1.5' POND 0.44 1.76 SP-1 DC-1 14.06 11 4575.29 cf 10-YEAR, 1.5' POND 0.91 2.67 SP-1 DC-1 14.44 12 7847.14 cf 100-YEAR, 1.5' POND 1.47 3.69 SP-1 DC-1 14.86 13 11747.28 cf -17- WATER QUALITY -18- GENERAL The water quality design consists of two elements: 1 . Biofiltration Swale 2. Wetpond CODE THRESHOLDS The threshold for biofiltration treatment of impervious surface runoff is 5,000 sq. ft. subject to vehicular use or storage. The site proposes approximately 2.5 acres of such surfacing and thus is over this threshold. The threshold for a wetpond (Special Requirement #5) is 1 acre of impervious surface subject to vehicular use or storage, and for the site to be within one mile of a Class 1 or 2 stream. Springbrook Creek is classified as a Class 2S stream and lies approximately 1/4 mile west of the site. Therefore, a wetpond is required. DESIGN PARAMETERS & METHOD The design parameters listed in the 1990 KCSWDM have been used to determine the required biofiltration swale and wetpond size. The site design utilizes perimeter swales to provide in excess of the required biofiltration surface area. These swales converge at a combination detention/water quality pond. The results are summarized below: East Swale 2-year Peak Runoff 0.64 cfs Design Flow Depth 8 inches Required Bottom Width for 200 If Swale 1.00 ft Equivalent Bottom Area Required 200 ft2 Provided Bottom Area for 460 If Swale 920 ft2 Actual Channel Slope 0 002 ft/ft Actual 2-Year Peak Velocity 0.79 ft/sec Actual 100-Year Peak Runoff 1.32 cfs Actual 100-Year Peak Velocity 0.98 ft/sec West Swale 2-year Peak Runoff 0.65 cfs Design Flow Depth 8 inches Required Bottom Width for 200 If Swale 1.03 ft Equivalent Bottom Area Required 206 ft2 Provided Bottom Area for 342 If Swale 684 ft2 Actual Channel Slope 0.002 ft/ft Actual 2-Year Peak Velocity 0.79 ft/sec Actual 100-Year Peak Runoff 1.33 cfs Actual 100-Year Peak Velocity 0.98 ft/sec -19- Water Quality Pond (Wetpond) Water Quality Storm Peak Runoff, QWq 0.44 cfs Water Quality Storm Runoff Volume, Vwq 6393 ft3 Impervious Surface Tributary to Wetpond, At_Wq 125,000 ft2 Required Wetpond Surface Area, AWq (1 % of At_Wq) 1250 ft2 Required Wetpond Dead Storage Volume = VWq 6393 ft3 Proposed Wetpond Surface Area 7755 ft2 Proposed Wetpond Dead Storage Volume 13,210 ft3 Both the biofiltration swales and the wetpond will require seeding with a wetland-type vegetation consistent with the 1990 KCSWDM. -20- East& West Biofiltration Swale Sizing Rating Table for Trapezoidal Channel Project Description Project File h:lhaestad\fmwlusrental.fm2 Worksheet Biofiltration Swale Sizing Flow Element Trapezoidal Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Bottom Width Constant Data Mannings Coefficient 0.350 Channel Slope 0.020000 ft/ft Depth 0.67 ft Left Side Slope 3.000000 H :V Right Side Slope 3.000000 H :V Input Data Minimum Maximum Increment Discharge 0.64 0.65 0.01 cfs Rating Table Bottom Discharge Width Velocity (cfs) (ft) (ft/s) 0.64 1.00 0.32 0.65 1.03 0.32 it 01/15/97 FlowMaster v5.11 01:46:00 PM Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 1 East &West Swale Conveyance Analysis Rating Table for Trapezoidal Channel Project Description Project File,. . h:lhaestad\fmw\usrental.fm2 Worksheet .• .. Biofiltration Swale Conveyance Analysis Flow Element Trapezoidal Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For: Channel Depth Constant Data Mannings Coefficient 0.030 Channel Slope 0.002000 ft/ft Left Side Slope 3.000000 H :V Right Side Slope 3.000000 H :V Bottom Width 2.00 ft Input Data Minimum Maximum Increment Discharge 0.65 1.32 0.68 cfs Rating Table Discharge Depth Velocity (cfs) (ft) (ft/s) 0.65 0.29 0.79 1.32 0.42 0.98 01/15/97 FlowMaster v5.11 01:44:52 PM Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 1 U.S. RENTALS Combination Detention/Water Quality Pond CE Job # 96401 Date: 15-Jan-97 Time: 02:33 PM BEGINNING ELEV. = 10.50 (ULTIMATE POND BOTTOM) 10.5 to 11.5 = Water Quality Sediment Storage 11.5 to 13.5 = Water Quality Dead Storage 13.5 to 15.0 = Active Detention Storage 15.0 to 16.0 = Pond Freeboard ENDING ELEV. = 16.00 (TOP OF POND BERM) WEST CELL CENTER CELL EAST CELL TOTAL CUMULATIVE STAGE ELEV AREA VOLUME AREA VOLUME AREA VOLUME AREA VOLUME VOLUME 0.0 10.5 2486 1591 513 4590 0 0 1.0 11.5 2882 1918 738 5538 5064 0 2.0 12.5 3304 2269 990 6563 6051 6051 3.0 13.5 3768 2671 1316 7755 7159 13210 3.0 13.5 3768 2671 1316 7755 0 0 3.5 14.0 4004 2872 1470 8346 4025 4025 4.0 14.5 4245 3080 1631 8956 4326 8351 4.5 15.0 4493 3294 1799 9586 4636 12986 4.6 15.1 10750 1017 14003 4.7 15.2 10847 1080 15083 4.8 15.3 10944 1090 16172 4.9 15.4 11040 1099 17272 5.0 15.5 11137 1109 18381 DRAINAGE AREA MAP -23- CL Q M Q Jo w Q (° Cr i_ 2 Qi- Zr W � � J Q U CA Z D Q CC CI IA s ' ' S.W. 3�4TH STREET C'-17Q 'L, �� I w• { E. °.. clac.r4t , „._ �.17 LIND AVENj1E= 1 `',^ ' 1 W. 34 ST,S REST / I ("t NS f >,»'v — ._. ,..._, _.. _... .> it I PROPOSED SIGN. SEE rye;,?-_._._..-__,...—. ___._,r ,___.._---_._ _ 1# ,S ARCH. SITE PLAN. ? � 'IE = 16,14 `n___, r __-._._..___.....__ .._.._ _____.. . _ .._.., ...__ 1 _.,_.� __-,_..--: .. ._-_,-_,_,.,._,_ ' (_-__.. • _.. 6'. \ I `` IE — 16.2 I �``�\. 1 7• - \ \ -- . a!,, _:'t Stt,-,;a; Y v i r ;;'i~' I i 2 `r Ail) -, i 1.' 0/'k,�'00'e/ ,,,1 r,s,iE:-L `j j 1 s Fj 1 V) Sl f { E n, 86' s I.E. h"cc,: .t ;.,z.;s [ t_.f'- I ",1 I •,• � ;i4. gs Sji).•,:O,OS i 1� i '; F f/ \, BOT..02.a t i i •) WI 1 1 i 1 - t ri 1 ('f \. , J' '1i. 1 !�I, ' 1 • f 1' { i 31 $ S I 5i' i I C r gl i i( �"c� ( pi s I ' A • 1,i1 .� :. it if o !II ft 'I'•.. 134 LF BIOSWALE ,i E f1 I f ( I ; ! x, x—x—x—x—x-- 1 r f \ ®0.20%a 288 SF I,. I L / t i I.: 1 I i I I I I BOTTOM AREA / l ! f f I i 1 i , / I I i I( sj 1I 1 „ i i\ O.rC7 ' 1... I F E = 15.87 * !L ,"" _.../ 1E11 {. I I' � i i 1 11 { if ' n � t Ni Ilid 1 Jl ', I \:1411 I �` ;1rc;,, \ 1.1w141 i, 1 (2)46 LF 8" SD 0 0. ! �l { t t 1 !r' I� r'.� l 460 LF BIOSWALE 0 0.20% k j I i 4 i 11 1 1 (I's �f 1 I , Q` 920 SF BOTTOM AREAAl1� j� {•1 • ; f} IN t I IE = 15.64 1 � 4_,- ; i I o 1` ,- ..• PROK)SED CO 71 > tp""� t'i z / 1 � t BUIUING f 'I4 1 11 ' CONNE T TOs 11 '.t ` I i i'3, i I` i, EXIST STUB 15 LF 0 1.007" BUILDING: 10600 SF ti J #,!1 I IEI' 12.o0± , q; \ WASH RAC 1390 SF i I i 1 t I ^. sY C?;,. ;3is. 0) 1 ... N j'(i j� IF I II � I Ct) t L , I F>Y ..; 1 i/fl +our FIN, FLR 18,50 =did V i �i k I t59--r0.0'1 �:F� L l7 `\S t ,,r--•,a t he 4, W 3` f _� f....1 y;^`;?l` T.. , a; CO \' fir' CO j't ( I€E jill 11 n 1 1 P f I:T""' •--.1 Y sMir°=11-.1, fi._.-...,.-_..,_.___W W � \, ..,:+q 1 I .1 10 cr, } ; Fp?,:,".O,v DOWNSPOUT DRAINS TO , Jt ir , 7 OUTFACE AT SPLASH 7�' 1 ! Ill I �, iC I SD MH BLOCKS ON ASPHALT. /, I } 4t. t I 1 ; f } „ i' t RIM = 17,8 ti 1 �' A ' ' I ,1 f •1;;;',Yli I / IE = 12.15 • , Z fj� il t j.? 11'i' I 7 I r ! ( \ t. ro..r jG i t s k`�1. 1,f ,,„ a) A 70'58'36" //I ' ,r`« i I1 tom) J # ? 5$—AO 4 �''� R = 380.84' !/ :i. ;1 1 f } ( S; , ,, of 209 LF 12" SD 0 Q53% L = 471.78' / / 1 yf f 1 i i t ''w, t �` i tf 4 (, ` l f `•,�,III 208 BIOSWALE 0 0.20%jf ://, /,' rj `All, �! 3Y 1 I • 1 •'j ° 11 418 SF OTTOM AREA • i' :1;,,,,;,----,..-.,, f SS��j • I i ` r 9 I i DETENTION POND / 7/ :j 11 ff f ` `7• 1 i IE v 15.22 �•, l / / 'w,es 6,9i.1 /,4- I ,, fi /' CONTROL STRUCTURE /f ;, / }i 1 " i I' , r RIM 1700 '/ /,+' , `A J f /h� J' G���6 G , •j `f,••• 7 i 1 s!1 1 . I •i 1� 43 LF 0 0,50% IE 13,25 :// + ' ''' / •-_.. _Fy_-'''4b'1-"--�.i-"S zf z 1 1.' IE = 15.10 ij f f' I ; 7_ I I 57-00( d % �, . :r.. ,,{,'__'_-w,__ ; 14 f I / A f/,...., % t/ i it !/ f ,...„., :, , ,, I # I' •.. 13,150 Imo? ,"" 13,50 ,a' 3.50 '/�/-ii` ,arl,/ / )d ri 10,50 ^, 0.50. 10.50 �� Sj`,'t r�,,,,/ ' , I x ' / / tr C ------8';,i'-1-''9—:---1.•—•-g"_ __ I.'i ___ �1�n ,r ! 'r, ,',,. /-,;t- : i --- «-..•� (ice 11 I I,1 / fq a,Pt 2JY /,fi' % rt } f ti /; ✓w"._> I s COMBINATION j'f /�r ,•' r ; r'ti�t • l r ", .. E f € i I.' \- DETENTION/WATER _ ,'� r!. ;'' '^J .,,," I I t w• ' l+ 1 DUALITY POND et{ i` •, i r' ,:; •n -, ---'''11 ,j 0 {!ik' �•' '•,,.,, ,n »•!'r''•~.,u"•••='if,. / ! /F 6. -•,,,,�.xr r" ; '•,I.,_. 1 I1 I :, vas i'.S ` /:- r._, ,y ,• ''i'' �•'t_-_,.__.. . J/ T Y \ ,a• -'4 }1 t. '�•.y i , 1 d,• /'.. J,�Y'" mot i '- /l` k Y t; !_ :,.J-'_ .:. .., '\ X ✓'Z�.J j�.. I .. .. S{/ 4f' mil .- s N 8750'47 W - .. _ 431:"65' ._.. .. ?cr.-,-Y:=,: _,. {{ te,rr'� __ _ '�tj•^-^-;�. .... ,....,_.s:. •- u....._._-"" "-".....,_ x '^ 4 may._ ..l,.r,_. B�. /� 2-.. ___ ...Y__ »_.... .._. .,... .._Mj,". , i L66ti 9ti :SO :titi 9ti upnut S'd9ti0b96\1O1796\96\S103f Odd\Od901f1d\ :I ■T■ TREECE & COMPANY r ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS 320 2nd Ave South, Suite 200, Kirkland,Washington 98033 Phone (206)822-2577 Fax(206)822-8758 January 20, 1997 RECEIVED Mr. Mark R. Pywell, AICP Q 1997 Senior Planner Development Services Division DEVELOPMENT PLANNING City of Renton CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 RE: U.S. RENTALS SITE-RENTON, WASHINGTON Dear Mark: Attached please find application and submittal documentation for SEPA review and site plan approvals for the above referenced site. Please note there are several documents that were requested or have been included for clarification (such as wetland reconnaissance, information on oil/grit separators, etc.)that, instead of submitting in a loose format, we have appended to the"Project Narrative". Mark,we appreciate your assistance in preparing this application and look forward to hearing from you should you have any questions, comments or need additional information. Best regards, TREECE& COMPANY. Barton G. Treece, Jr., P.E. BGT:vg:pywen.120 cc: Peter Powell, Powell Development Mike Crouch, U.S. Rentals **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 01/20/97 14 :25 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9700330 Amount : 1, 504 . 16 01/20/97 14 :25 Payment Method: CHECK . Notation: #24004 US RENTAL Init : GC Project # : LUA97-009 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Location: SE CORNER OF 34TH AND LIND AVE SW Total Fees : 1, 504 . 16 This Payment 1, 504 . 16 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 504 . 16 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 .345 . 81. 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage 4 . 16 . -•r, l�r • I '' (4 i t . . . . ..c.i .. :>»t .... ..... nnnn .: : n n...: ^ *' vw < . » ln .n „. : a . . . ... .:..... ...... ..n :.: .. . :. ... .: Y.p.::d.::>J.,np s„:pFn a lxa . . . »nn . . n W ', • • • - -. ' - .. • tits ' GEOTECHNI: CAL. REPORT. { - • . l . Warehouse/Office .Facility `'" .•SW '34th-Street and Lind',Avenue ' ' ' ' Renton-- . -, --, • Project No:.T-3065 . . • .5y.' 1 " , `r i .:iY•.•.:..,�xt'X::w.fi:,L'Y.. ` +S.L4j +�,{o,>n . ',',:..--1i''..,'' . .‘...;' •-!.,k,.,'.4\.',: , � >a' . .. •2 '"LA'lac,2a'� � - ./',\..1 ,„„.„,,'.,,,\.'Z'N,.,.,,,„,,,",\,.:.4\.A.,-.„\',,.''...,.\ ,4.J.i.g,, .,':'.'_•. ,1' ,;-'.l...,-,•...„'. ,.,:•::-:::a_'•,m.-,•,.:.-....-.:':.',•,:,,m:,;:,,cil.-i,r....,..T. :,.7,1;.,.-,,'..,,,-,.:-.,.:;.1.......,-,..x'.-.....i.....s...s.--i g.,..lt...........,..,o.-...-. s.t "R ��, ,, Terra Associates Inc. � rS.t at+n• n @ "R, n� r t� f ..i..:.:.:tittx'y.;: , .,fix :.i ,... ...>....."....... ::i:.i".ma`s:.^:.::,'.:::..::tit .,'. ......................:.::..b ,:,,..:;:;i;.'or,t Y:,Yt :... ... ....Y::::::......;:. ....:t:: ;.:;y :'3: Y:a , , • :- . it, , 4 4,41. •.. „ : ,, . .`, .—.• ,- ' , ' '. ' • •_,,, •-'.' . - • -. , ., . . -....mz• • ' ' . : Pre ......'...1.6....„..:...i.:„.....-..s............r......'......;,.•'.'..• , _. pared for: 2 jn . - - - ' . . - Powell. 'Development Company. - <'' ti,,,,..$ Kirkland, Washington: „; . • ` February 9. 1996 ,1,' • • r - - _.REC • • Z.; , • ....:,,M..:: JAN .2'0" 1997' - .r:: , . DEVELOPNIENT,PLANNING ,.:> ' CITY OF P NTON A<<. ititr., _ .r{yr yr, :::'{.::::li � PM`'';';^;.';l;:i„W Boris No B-2. Logged by: KPR . ' • ' ' ' . " - - •'Date:• .1/9/96 .` : • - - Graph/.. - '•-• .. ' - Relativ •e :Depth . ' . ' (N) .. ' ..Water. : :. -. USCS Soil Description E'_ Blows/ Content • Density - ' dft,) v' foot • (/o) „ cn . €i:I.:i'> r:#:IM, , Brown sand with silt and few' , - s: .;:'>^ :* '•gravel fill cuttings, fine to- ::.:.'r``$N{ >. medium-grained;moist. - FILL:.Brown SAND with.silt and ' 17.0 i •SP-SMMedium Dense •- • 12'. •- few gravel;-medium-grained, •• I , ff{::> :::*; i • saturated. - • I. > FILL:,As above'but gray. , ,. " . • .5' . . . Gray organic SILT interbedded withal 12 , , LL=85 1 `-'H Medium Stiff t.r I inch thick peat layers "PL=46 I: ' Dark gray silty SAND,very. 'I - ' FSF�JM) 11. fine=grained, saturated. ' ,_ Medium•Dense- - - 16 • - -05'; ?%`<•: Black SAND, fin• e-grained - - - `: % /' , saturated. - . . • • ;SP„`" k;_ ?"...: .26 oz%$ • • 30.4' ``>�`" { "''":'' Black.SAND very fine to fine -' • • - r:> fh,;::: Medium Dense... - T ## ;:::,,,<yr grained,with occasional 1 inch;' , . 1 ::if{:: •• of'non lactic silt' , • °fYt ' ',.•saturated: .. p -15 Black to•brown-silty SAND.with . -, • - ' interbeds.of sandySILT Ve ry� Y Medium Dense• _ • .`>:`' fine grained, saturated. . . - 17' • 36'•.5 • SM 20 J . Black.to'brown silty SAND.with .- • • • • , interbeds of silt(as.'abovej.,,• . ,Very Dense • • - - . . 5 r'• • 24.1 • .:I.S.AEN::'• . - :- ',. ' ' .- . .. . .. , -:',.. .•...• -. *.'. , ' '. .:. *. - .' -' .. ... ..-•• ' ' ' ,. ,. . , . ' _',. - • .. .' Ignini.. 'Black'SAND,medium=grained, • - i %Ils.;.1.3:;.'• saturated. , : r•SP ,1 '••••.•:;;;fr; .•• Black SAND,.as above but • - "s »:•;{; , Very Dense - ."'81 ' 35.0: ' • ..?;_..?s:::::`:' fine-grained.. ; ,:. Test boring terminated,at,29,feet.: - Groundwater encountered,at,2 feet. •. ' . ; • • ". ,. - .,Hole,plugged with.3 bag of bentonite chips•mixed with cuttings. :• , Bentonite slurry added.to hole to control heave'." • ' ' :' : _ , ' • j - BORING• LOG. :` --. . ' ' ..WAREHOUSE/OFFICE-.FACILITY • : , ` \►V TERRA RENTON, 'VVASHINGTON ,. . ' '''• ASSOCIATES ' ' . - , . . • - '••-: Geotechnical Consultants,- ' ' - • • - . - . •• • • - _ . Prol. No T3065 .Date•.1/96 igure A:. '. Boring .No. B-6... . Logged by: KPR, j Date:_ 1/11/96, : - . • Graph/ Relative: Depth • °'. .(N) Water . E 'Co e • Blows nt of USCS Soil Descnption Density .. • :(ft.) ' . c3'. ° • ; . .v cn foot .. (�°) ' Brown gray, gravelly'medium :€ -grained silty sand FILL cuttings, • - ,- .- - , saturated: , SM : FILL: Gray SAND with gravel, Dense - 32 9,3- , . • medium=grained,,wet._ ' , . _ . , L Gray SAND, medium-. _ » FILL: r y. D, m m, Loose , '5 `i'i': < .:: 1> grained, saturated. , -. 3 62.9 Dark brown PEAT, amorphous,wet. , ;Soft. :, y 1 ; „ , . . ML i. Gray sandy-SILT;very fine-grained Soft : sand, saturated, medium plastic. - 3' "58'.2 • t...: • ... _ Unit'wt=94.3 pcf Gray.silty SAND;very fine,to,,- . , Loose . , ' -• - Bentonite slurry - . fine'-grained;saturated. 10 , • • . • added to hole » SM'`: <: to control heave . "" `<::: ,Dark,gray silty SAND,very fine = to fine-grained, saturated`,grades ' Medium Dense _ • ' ' T to black sand in sampler tip. , , I . 19 ;28.7 , --°15, Black SAND, fine to coarse '- , ?? '?' grained, saturated. Dense' . . - 33 21.5 >:� i.'#`s#i;'ss:�/> Black SAND medium-to coarse- ° - VeryDense ,- : ,«/I%:% grained.. ,. . • :. r #<:: • 64 . .20.5 . • • :: > ; • • _.. ::,,, ;;;s;:.:«: `'"'+" VeryDense, %''%;'s� `'%;. Black SAND;'as above. - ' Page 1 of BORING LOG > <> ��\\\� :.TERRA • FARWEST. STEEL , • -, • ASSOCIATES • . RENTON, WASHINGTON - Geotechnical'Consultants . • ' , . , 'Proj. No. T-3064 • Date 1/96 .Fgure A-4 • • ' Boring No. B-6: (Continued) " dLogge by:: ., PR • - • Date: 116 . • . ' . • Graph j." Relative. Depth. a. . (N) ; Water. USCS Soil Description, ` E. : Blows/ :Content Density (ft.) .' o • foot' • `ase`s •`t S,:ii, .. • - - • • . • • ' $ SP gs's: Black.SAND;as • above... • Very Dense k...; 35 Dark gray.silty,SAND with - , • . - __ _':' trace clam'shells,:fine to• = = medium grained, saturated.. Loose 7" \25.1 -'40•, •i f............................. _k i-�? • - - - •Dark gray silty SAND;asabove. ., _ :, , , "{?' gi I _ 58 29.8., . '' A `ig'M' 'Dark•gray,SAND with silt,,trace . _ ' • • - - '` SP-SM,'`> clamshells, very.fine to fine .Very Dense'.- -• " • <%:= "<?: grained, saturated. e • '7-45 , • . . , ' ' ``'`'' ei" Dark gray silty SAND,with trace Loose - . . bits'of wood,clam;shells and to• 10 36.9 " ' _= clay,very fine,to fine-grained, Medium Dense ', .' _ "saturated. • - . -. -=50 ' Dark gray silty SAND, as above. : Loose' , - r ' 6 • 32.1 -. ._55•: - " - - '. ' '' •-." . . .. ' ; Dark,gra•y'silty SAND,-as above: Medium Dense • -.' . •.-T • • 28 24.2 , . . , . • . „ , . . . .. . . . • ._ . . . . , , . . .. . . . . . . , . Test boring terminated at 59 feet. ,,• • • Ponded•surface water. '. _• • ' • • Groundwater encountered at 7 feet.. • ' , -. ' • Hole plugged with 21 bags of bentonite chips mixed with cuttings.' Page 2 of 2' ..- BORING' LOG. • TRR • FARWEST 'STEEL . >` \\ A . RENTON, WASHINGTO N_ • . I ASSOCIATES . , , _ Geotechnical Consultants:. ' ' Proj. No. T=3064 Date' 1/_96' Figure,;A-4 SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS , - , - SIZE OF OPENING 'IN 'INCHES I .NUMBER OF MESH-PER INCH;"U.S. STANDARD.- - - - . _ . GRAIN SIZE SIN',MM- 'tap00 co_ V' M) N N \\ ,. \ , '..O O. O _O O, - O"O M N O O - O O O. O - _ - tD sh to N. " )U)• .M - •t. •- -N (O. N O' 'O O O O O O O O- O O • • - '_ - D_ H - --80 - � cncn � . C7 D ; ."n 70 30 m O, f�l i1` D 40' C - -0 to z y., _ 50 :, 50 cn ' • 71 40 • . _ _ .- - 60 CO rTl _ 30 `t . 70 m o c.,o 20 80 . - '�_.i' 10 �. ' . �pD CI .. � : -.0 = -- _100 • fTl(/) _ "- — O O 'O 00-_� Off,r0. 'N . Opp:to st M; N•' _�:00-.io st M' N - .-q O, O O. O. . O-O O_- O O O O'- n-T1 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS =n:Z - COARSE -' I FINE :- • COARSE--I - MEDIUM . .I ' •FINE - z P1.D COBBLES - GRAVEL SAND FlNES Ong z v.) Boring or . Depth - : Moisture Key." Test Pit: (ft.) . USCS Description -_ Content--(%) _LL PL '..1- .• • B-1: ' 2.5 SP-SM.' SAND with silt'.and some gravel" - 0 . B-1 . 17.5- • SP—SW clean SAND..:. : , SIEVE"ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES . - I :NUMBER-OF MESH PER INCH,.U.S.:STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM _ �O N CO sh _ O . tD d M N O 'O `O O. O .O' -- N TC-.� M N M�\ try. \ �'."_' _ O .N •Od' -� � N O, O O O. O. O O O -O O -_ c? 90 1,0. ' 40 oD. _ 40 60. CO o. 70 m o �N O; .O O GO c0 s1• N) N _ ., -. O O O O .O 0 O'O O O'- O _ 0 N . - _ ::GRAIN SIZE• IN :MILLIMETERS : o o, o 0 0 =,n Z COARSE: • I FINE COARSE':I- MEDIUM 1-. FlNE rn D COBBLES GRAVEL SAND - FINES' - • - � 0 n, • —' ' -Boring or J Depth � sure, USCS :.Description :.. LL .. PL ( •Test: Pit: ft.)' .. . Content (%) . • B-2 " 2.5- SP-SM SAND with silt O B-2 17.5-.19 ML sandy- SILT. _ ; V I " .. TERRA' ASSOCIATES, . Inc. ' . . ,.., Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering,`Geology , Environmental Earth Sciences , February 9,;1996 ` Project No. T-3065 . Mr. Peter Powell Powell Development Company = 737 Market Street 1Kirkland, Washington 98033 = . , Subject: Geotechnical Report . ; ' - ' Warehouse/Office Facility ' SW 34th Street and Lind Avenue - - ` Renton, Washington • ,_ Dear Mr. Powell: = . ' ;,As requested,we have conducted a geotechnical engineering study for the subject-project.-In general, the site,is underlain by five to six feet,of dense granular fill overlying two to four feet of clayey silt, organic silt, and peat.' These compressible soils are underlain by medium dense„to dense alluvial sands: To reduce post-construction settlements-to what may be considered,to tolerable levels, we recommend that the building area be pre-loaded with a surcharge fill: Following successful completion of the surcharge program, the proposed warehouse/office ' facility may be constructed using conventional spread footings placed,on the existing fill or on new structural- - fill, as required. If the estimated post-construction differential settlements of 1/2 inch cannot be tolerated by,the construction,you should plan for deep',foundation support or removal of the organic consolidating layer., ' The attached report describes our exploration and explains our recommendations in greater detail.- We trust this ' information'is sufficient for your,, present needs. Please call if you have any-questions: or need additional information.;.. ; ' Sincerely yours, ' TERRA ASSOCIATES,INC, , : Kevin.P• . Roberts„NE.cq �4*. o,� ,,A Project gi er 'I= t' `'.' . �oisTE., j cis_ 10 T eo ore J. Schepp r,=P. . Principal Engineer ��;� NAIL - KPR/TJS:eb .EXPIRES 6115/`l'') . - --. cc: Mr. Bart Treece, Horton.Dennis and Associates, Inc.. ' 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101, Kirkland, Washington,98034.• Phone (206) 821-7777 - • TABLE OF CONTENTS;, Page .1.0 Project Description 1 2.0 Scope of Work .. , 1 :, 3:0 Site'Conditions 2 = 3.1 Surface 2 3.2 Soils " " 2 3.3 Groundwater. 2 • 3.4 Seismic Hazards 3 . , • ' . • 4:0 Discussion.and Recommendations " . 3 , . ' i 4.:1: General 3 ` 4.2 •Site Preparation and Grading ° • 4 . 4.3 Surcharge,and Settlements 5 4:4 Spread Footing Foundations _ 6 4.5 Excavate.and Refill Procedure 7 4,.6 Timber Piling' 7 . • 4.7 Augercast Piling 8 4.8 : • Slab-on-grade Floors 8 4.9 Excavations 9 • 4:1'0 : Utilities 9 .. 4.11' Lateral Pressures 9 ' 4:12 ;Drainage 10 _ 4:13 `Pavement's 10 5.0 Additional Services 11 6.0 Limitations; „ , ,11 Figures Vicinity.Map . "Figure.1 Exploration Location Plan : Figure 2' Typical Settlement Marker Detail ' • Figure3 ` Reinforced Soil..Wall Section. .Figure 4 - ' Appendix Field Exploration and Laboratory Testing Appendix A 1 __I • • Geotechnical Report • : Warehouse/Office Facility " ; SW 34th Street and :Lind,Avenue:: _' Renton, Washington 1.0 PROJECT.DESCRIPTION - The project:will consist of construction of a warehouse/office facility in Renton, Washington.- The location,of the project site is shown on the:'Vicinity.Map,- Figure' 1. : Horto nis and.=-Ass • n Denociates,.Inc., provided an -undated conceptual site_plan showing the'location of the,warehouse facility and associated loading arid'parking .. areas.:,'The site plan.shows a'65,400 square foot warehouse building• occupying,the.central,portion-of.the site. • • Truck loading areas will be located at the eastern and western sides of the building. Parking areas will lie within - the northern and western sections:o f the site.. ' 'While specific design details are not available to us,we expect the warehouse building will be'constructed:using - pre-cast concrete tilt-up;wall•panels or masonry blocks. .Grades at the'',site may raised:up four;to .six feet above existing site grades to create a dock-high floor level. .We;anticipate building loads Will be about:three j ' ' kips per lineal foot along walls;. 80 to 100 kip§ for columns,'.with:floor,loads'of approximately 200 to 300 pounds per square foot:(psf). , The recommendation s in the following sections of this report are,based on our understanding of the,project's., design features..We should review final design drawings and specifications to verify that our recommendations, : • 'have been properly interpreted and incorporated,into project design. 2.0 SCOPE'OF WORK On January 9, -1996, we drilled two test-borings the:site to depths Of 28.5 and,29_.feet-below existing site ;'grades. We also reviewed and used-test`boring.information from the•.adjacent;Farwe`st Steel.site.',Using the: information obtained from. the,,=subsurface exploration, we :performed analyses to 'develop geotechnical„ .recommendations for project design and construction. Specifically,this report addresses the following • • Soil and groundwater conditions • Site preparation and grading • Foundation alternatives • Surcharge.and:settlements - i • Lateral earth pressures: .. • Slab-ori-grade floors - • Utilities " • Pavements • • Drainage requirements " " ; February 9, 1996 Project No.,T-3065„ 3.0 , SITE:CONDITIONS '3.1 Surface:. ;The:subject site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of SW 34th Street and Lind Avenue in - Renton, ,Washington •This location°is shown on Figure 1.. The site is bounded'to:the south and north by: : I . undeveloped property and SW 34th Street,-respectively.` Lind Avenue bounds the site on,the west.::An open, undeveloped parcel(Farwest Steel site)bounds the site on the east. . The site and vicinity are flat. An existing railroad=spur track enters the northeastern corner of•.the:property,and 'curves in a southwestward direction to join a track leading west of the Site., We noted that the track was raised slightly above,surrounding grades. We observed shallow ditches filled with standing water adjacent;to;the.spur track. Vegetation at the site,consisted.of sparse>grasses.'Standing water was observed over much of the site at the time.. our visit. Stormwater drainage from adjacent:roadways is directed to storm drains along curbs and' gutters - : ;located along the northern and:western margin of the site. 3.2 Soils The soil conditions at the site generally consist of sand with gravel and "silt fill overlying a'variably thick layer of • compressible peat; clayey silt, or organic silt., The compressiblesoils were underlain: `by'generally competent sand and silty sand deposits. - - Each boring showed fill soil comprised..of sand with gravel and silt to a'depth of about five feet This material : was generally medium dense to dense,indicating it was,compacted.`.The compressible native soils under thefill consisted mostly of dark brown.silt'y peat, gray organic:silt, or gray to brown clayey silt:. These.soils occur at - five feet below existing grades and were between two and four feet thick. 'Interbeds of black to:brown sandthat was fine to.coarse-grained andloose:.to medium dense was found underlying'the compressible layers. Borings B-1 and B-2 were terminated within very sdense.horizons of the black sand. - j.The Geologic.Map of the Renton Quadrangle;King County; Washington by,D.R.:Mullineaux'(1965) shows'that the soils are,mapped as peat(Qlp):.The peat seen in Boring B-1 correlates with the published description of this soil unit. .Figure's A-2 through A-4 in Appendix A,present more detailed descriptions of the subsurface .. conditions encountered in the test borings: The approximate test boring locations are shown on Figure 2: 3.3" Groundwater. We encountered groundwater in'each of the test. bOrings7 proundwater levels observed:are recorded on the 'Boring Logs. Water encountered near the'ground surface appeared to'consist of a perched zoneof-infiltration froth`recent heavy rains.'" In general, the static groundwater table was found at;a depth„of'.about seven feet: Annual and seasonal,fluctuations in the depth of the groundwater table should be expected. Page No. 2 , February 9,:T996 Project No:T-3065 ,3.4 Seismic Hazards The Puget Sound area:falls within Seismic Zone 3as,-classified by the Uniform Building Code(UBC). Based on.',; the soil conditions encountered andthe local geology; Table 16-J of the 1994 UBC indicates a site coefficient of 1..5 should be used in design of the structure..' We reviewed the.results of our field-and laboratory testing and assessed the potential:for liquefaction of the. site's soils during an earthquake. Liquefaction is a phenomenon where there is a reduction.or complete loss of soil strength due to an,:increase.in pore water pressure induced by vibrations from a seismic event.. Based.onthe,.,. information obtained and considering theadditional:confningstresses from the building and fill Weight, it is our.. o inion p that the risk of liquefaction-related impacts to the structure are minimal. 4.0 DISCUSSION.AND RECOMMENDATIONS i 4.1 General" Based on our study,,in our opinion,there are,no'.geotechnicalconstraints that would preclude construction of the" _ " proposed;facility: The primary geotechnical concern for construction at this,site:is the two to'"four:foot-thick layer;of clayey silt, .organic_ silt, and`silty peat at depths 'of five -to nine.feet `below existing site grades: Consolidation of these soils•-will occur whensubjected to''loads comparable to those.expected:from construction , ofthewarehouse/office building. = .A.fill surcharge program implemented .prior,to'construction.:will•consolidate,the compressible-soil:layers and 1 , induce most ofthe•primary settlements,under loads expected from•the.project: Once the primary settlements are -.. complete, lesser amounts'"of secondary'.settlement will'. continue throughout:the•'life",of the structure. These "secondary settlements.are in addition:to settlements that will occur from placement of the building's foundation." ' ' . Analysis indicates that over a .50 year•span, one inch of'total "secondary settlement'and 1/2 inch_,differential settlement are expected. If the settlements cannot be tolerated by.the facility,other foundation:alternatives will -• need•to•be considered."These alternatives can,consist,of • ' • -Overexcavation and removal of the organic soils and•replacement'with a"structural:engineered fill-for foundation support ; • " Piling support using:either"timber or augercast.piling systems ,'The foundation option chosen for design;.of the facility will depend on how,much risk of damage to the structure from differential 'settlement is:acceptable ,to the .owner The "followings';sections',provide 'detailed - recommendations regarding the above issues:'.and - other -geotechnical` .design -considerations.: ; .'These recommendations should be incorporated into the final design drawings and construction specifications: February 9;`1996 Project No.T-3065 ,4.2" Site Preparation and Grading , , !,Following clearing,the fill surface should.be,proofrolled,with.heavy construction equipment prior to placement jof additional fill:. Soft yielding areas should be'overexcavated to.firm bearing soil and replaced structural • Mill:"Where excavations to achieve firm conditions are excessive, use of a geotextile fabric,such as,Mirafi S00X . ' din conjunction with limited overexcavation and replacement with a;structural fill can be considered.",Typically, " 118 inches of clean granular structural_fill over the fabric will achieve a"stable"subgrade. - , tour laboratory,test results show"that'the existing f 11 was above its,optimum moisture:Content at the time of our. investigation, and that Some of,the'fill contains up to 12 percent fines..,: These'conditions maybe difficult to compact•if the moisture conditions cannot be carefully controlled:."Extreme care should:be taken"to-ensure that : ; ,; exposed surfaces of the on-site fill do not become disturbed due to weather and construction traffic Moreover,' the ability;to Use these soils as structural fill will_depend.on'their moisture content and the„prevailing'weather - ; ',conditions at the time,of construction: It will be difficult to achieve proper compaction of these`soils;when their moisture, content.'is above.optim :um.: When,the 'moisture is excessive, the soil can:be dried by aeration:to a moisture content which:will'allow,for.-proper compaction. We recommend that the structural fill required to achieve site grades'"consist of inorganic granular:soil meeting the following grading.requirements: _ -Maximum Aggregate Size 6 inches Minimum"Retained on the No. 4 Sieve 25 percent • , •i _ Maximum Passing"the No:200 Sieve 25'percent r Based on-"the"Minus;3/4-inch-Fraction ; . ( ) :(see following narrative);. _ If fill placement takes place during wet weather or if the moisture conditions of the fill material cannot be • _ controlled, consideration should be given to importing:"fill„soil"that conforms with the above gradation, but with the.maximum.passingthe No. 200 sieve reduced to five percent. ,,` Structural fill"materials should be`placed in"uniform loose layers not exceeding:12 inches and,compacted to,a minimum of 95 percent of the soil's maximum density, as:determined•by,,ASTM'Test Designation D-698 '(Standard Proctor). "The moisture'.content Of,the;Soil'at'the time of.compaction-Should be within:about two percent of its optimum,as,'determined by this"same ASTM:method. " Prior to ".constructing foundations and floor slabs, We recommend probing or proofrolling the subgrade,to determine:if any isolated soft:and,yielding areas are'present:' As-discussed above,::soft or yielding areas`should be overexcavated;and filled to grade"with structural-fill or crushed rock. ,I i• February,9, 1996 ProjectNo:T-3065• .. . . • 4.3 . . Surcharge and Settlements :. . For spread footing foundation support;and;slab-on-grade construction,`we recommend placing a surcharge fill I over the building area. The surcharge program ;is necessary to limit_building.,'settlements to what;may:be considered tolerable. levels.. Our surcharge and settlement lanalysis is,based on an assumed existing ground surface elevation of 12 feet. In addition,,our analysis is based'on•a finished floor(top-of-slab);elevation of about. 16;feet and the,anticipateda floor loads discussed" hove d: :We shoul review the final"foundation and.grading _ plans in order to better assess expected.settlements. Primary. Consolidation The site grades should'be raised using. structural fill as outlined in the Site .Preparation.and Grading section. Once grade is achieved, an additional four feet of fill should be placed as a surcharge.. This surcharge fill does not need to,meet any.,special requirements other than•having a minimum in-place unit'weight cif125 pounds per • cubic foot(pcf)."However,it may be advisable top,"use"a good quality fill which could be used to raise grades in other portions of the site, such as parking and driveway areas, if necessary. -. 1'We do not believe it is necessary to place;a 'surcharge• of fill within the parking and access 'easement areas: However,the structural fill required in the pavement areas should be.placed as soon as possible.to allow enough • time for consolidation of the compressible-layers and to reduce potential settlement impacts.to pavement and. utilities. . The,'estimated total_primary:settlerrients under the,recommended surcharge range from six to eight inches'.across;. - 'the building area.-:These settlements are expected to occur eight to ten weeks "following full application:.of:the s. surcharge loading. The actual period for completion and magnitude of the settlements will be governed by variations 'in subsurface conditions at the site. The.:rate of;consolidation can be:accelerated by placing an additional.thickness of fill:surcharge...We estimate that placing an additional three feet of surcharge',will reduce. the surcharge time by about;30 percent, .• To verify the-amount of settlement`and the rate `of movement, .the surcharge program should be monitored-by ,. installing settlement markers.: A typical'settlement-markerinstallation"is shown.on Figure 3. .The;settlement markers should be installed on the existing gradeprior to,placing any building Or surcharge fills. 'Once installed, elevations of both the fill height and:marker should be recorded daily by a registered land surveyor until',the full height of the surcharge-is;in place.' Once fully,•surcharged,readings should continue weekly.-until the anticipated : ,settlements have occurred., ;It is critical'that the grading.contractor recognize the•importance of the settlement marker installations. All , 'efforts must be made to protect the markers from damage during fill placement. It:is difficult, if not impossible, to.evaluate the progress of:the surcharge i program,if the.'markers are, damaged or'destroyed by construction • !equipment: As a result, it'may be:necessary to install new markers and to extend the surcharging time to ensure that settlements have ceased and that building construction can begin. • • .February, 9,'1996 Project No, T-3065, ' We recommend that the surcharge pad extend a ,minimum of five feet beyond the building perinieter.:and then: "slope down at an inclination;of 1:1" (Horizontal:Vertical).:It appears,`that sections of‘the southeastern building perimeter may be located close to the railroad spur that curves.;along the southern property;line. If sufficient area is not available.to slope the surcharge, the surcharge may be supported at a near vertical inclination F , (minimum 1.:12).using a reinforced soil wall. Figure 4 shows a typical reinforced-soil wall section.- , ih -Post-construction Settlements. Primary consolidation of:compressible,soils at the site_will be-achieved)Upon:completion"'of the surcharge ,. program. ',Secondary. .consolidation will continue at the site throughout the: life of,the structure.`` During secondary consolidation;you should expect a maximum post-construction settlement of one inch_and differential ,settlementof-1/2 inch. ,-These values represent'expected settlements over,a 50 year.period. We anticipate that ,'most of these settlements will occur within five•to ten years after completion of the'structure. Impact of Surcharge on Adjacent;Roadway'and Utilities Depending on its location,'the proximity"of the surcharge fill pad to the adjacent railroad spur and.roadways may result in settlement of these structures due to soil beneath them being influenced by.the pre-load fill pad. - ' We recommend'placingmoniitoring points on the roadway curbs and',pavement as necessary, to record possible . ,movements during surcharge::.A'similar monitoring program:should be;implemented for the railroad spur if it cannot:tolerate:possible settlement from:the pre-load: : , Sufficient monitoring points,should:be established',since some of these points will likely be disturbed by traffic. . ggmaking photographic y In addition,-we su est a curve of the;curbs and pavement before placing the surcharge to. , determine.if any movement occurs during surcharging. - Similarly, if the pre=load fill pad is placed over or,near underground utilities, they may experience'Vertical and/or lateral,movement as a:result of the'stress changes in.the'soil'associated.with the placement of a pre-load: ' , fill pad. Utility`organizations should be prepared,to relocate utilities as required prior'to.construction of the pre- load,'if necessary. -We"can-;better'assess the level of risk to;adjacent structures and utilities upon review of the f nal plans. ; i Foundations 4.4 S read Foot n� - n Following'successful completion'oldie surcharge program, if the above estimated.settlements are considered tolerable,the building maybe supported conventional spread footing'foundations bearing on a minimum of four feet of structural 'fill..:,Existing..competent fills May included in determining.the,,.depth of the structural''. :fill. Perimeter foundations exposed to the weather should be tat a minimum depth of 1,5 feet below final exterior` ' grades. We recommend designing foundations for a net allowable bearing,capacity of 3;000 psf: .For short-term-loads ;;, , such,as wind and seismic, a 1/3 increase in this,allowable capacity can be used With the anticipated loads--and : , ; • bearing stresses,:the estimated total settlements are as discussed'in the Post-construction Settlements section:,. • g February..9.,..1996. Project No T-3065. For designing foundations.,to',resist lateral loads, a'base'friction coefficient•of 0.4'can be'used: 'Passive earth pressures acting'on the:side of the footing and buried portion of,the foundation stem:wally can also,be,considered: , :We recommend calculating'this lateral resistance:using an equivalent,fluid weight:of 350,pcf We recommend, not including the upper.,12.'inches of soil;in this,computation because„they :can be affected by:weather or disturbed by future grading' activity.,. This value assumes the foundation Will be,constructed neat against • -. .,'' 1-:competent fill soil or`.backfilled with:''structural fill as described in the Site Preparation'and Grading section.. The' , recommended lateral resistance value includes a safety':factor of 1.5. . .- • 4.5 Excavate'and,Refill Procedure '"j For this,procedure,the,consolidating soil layerwill be excavated and removed'from.below the,foundations, with • grades then~'restored to the desired.construction: elevation using, structural fill. Based,,on the .information ;..'obtained, excavations of nine.to.ten feet below existing surface grades will be necessary:,`_The excavation will' also need to.be•oversized to.allow for placing'structural fill a'distance-laterally from the edge O• f the'foundation ; equal to 1/2 the depth of the fill below the foundation Once'removed, grades 'can he-restored'.using a structural fill placed: and-compacted rin accordance with the. • recommendations in-the'Site Preparation,and;Grading section. The.excavation-.to.reinove the.clayey silt; organic silt,;or peat layers will "expose loose to medium dense silty .sand; and sand in a water-bearing condition: Therefore,:it will probably:be'necessary to place an initial 12 to 18 inch layer of quarry rock or railroad,ballast in order to establish a firm base_on'which to place the remaining portion'of•thestructural fill For thismethod'of obtaining support,'.spread footing foundations can be designed as;discussed in the„preceding section.. Foundation i 3 settlements-should he,negligible, with\less than°1/2'inch.total-settlement-anticipated'. This settlement,will:be immediate,occurring.'as'building;loads are applied. 4.6 Timber Piling Transferring structural loading,below the consolidating layers with.the,use of timber piling can be considered.,. '.We estimate that timber piling with ainininiuin tip diameter of eight inches will achieve"an allowable axial load of 25 tons when driven into-the:medium'dense; black to brown-gray sand at a minimum tip;:elevation.of 20;feet below existing surface grades.'This allowable axial load takes into.account potential negative loading caused.b'y downdrag on the pile due to consolidation of the organic layer under building fill and floor slab loading: Full axial'capacity can be,used provided,the piles are spaced,at a minimum,of three pile diameters:' .Closer, spacing,'in pile groups•will require a reduction, in the.single,pile.capacity.' This reduction will depend on the : number ofpiles in the Pilegroup and the s acin used.'; For,resistance to lateral loadin a lateralpile capacity•of; P� Spacingg, six tons can be used.`;:Estimated pile settlements are,1/2;,inch and less:: .Elastic Shortening of the pile is not included in the above value. • Page No:•:7` • °February 9, 1996 • `- . Project No. T-3065 To successfully install"timber:piling at'the site, it may' be necessary,.to predrill the'upper five;to six".feet of existing fill soils. The pile:driving hammer used to install the piles should have sufficient energy to,drive the piling tot he tip elevation without damaging the pile: For this purpose,we recommend the pile driving equipment have a'minimum rated energy:of 15,0.00 foot-pounds with an efficiency factor of at least 70 percent: ' We also:'recommend that prior:to Ordering-and installing production piles, a minimum of three test piles.:be driven at_the site to verify anticipated tip elevations and ,establish:driving criteria:for .use in evaluating , production Pile'capacities'. The,.test piles should be driven with the same equipment that will_be used in the ` - production pile installation. , , 4.7 Augercast Piling. Augercast:piling can be considered as.an alternative to timber piling in transferring''.foundation,'loading.below the peat and.gray-brown'clayey silt layers. For,16-inch diameter pilings with a:tip elevation.of 20 feet below.. existing surface' grades, an:allowable axial:load;of 30 tons' is`.available for design. . This loading takes into • - account the potential negative loading effects due to downdrag • 'Similar effects on the.reduction of axial pile capacity due to close,spacing apply to' augercast:piles. For resistance to lateral loads, an allowable-lateral pile capacity of four tons is available: 'The estimated:pile settlement is 1/2'inch and less.. Elastic'shortening of the ile is not includedin:thisvalue: Augercast piles are'formed,by the''pressure injection of".grout`through`a,hollow:stem auger which, is.slowly retracted'from the ground after advancement to'the recommended tip elevation: .The grout pressure`used .will compress the soils withinthe immediate vicinity of the..pile, thereby increasing to some extent the pile diameter and the amount of grout required' to construct.the pile. ;,For'planning purposes, we suggest consideringa',30 percent increase in the amount of grout necessary to form the pile: .1'o construct augercast piling, a;higher than normal reliance on,quality workmanshipis,required for successful installations: lt;is..extremely important that:.the.grout pressure be consistent.and,uniform during the installation and th'at:retraction of the auger`-;occurs at a slow;uniform pace beneath a sufficient`head.of grout'in the.pile .'" column.' The contractor should.;have adequate means for verifying grout pressure arid:estimating the volume of ' ' grout used, in construction of the piles Because of the compression effects:arid the possible influence on ' • • adjacent pile. construction, the installation sequence:should be based on a.minimum pile spacing:of five pile diameters. Once the grout column has achieved its initial 24 hour set pile construction between these spacings can'be completed. ; 4.8 Slab-on-grade Floors With site preparation completed as described in:the Site Preparation and Grading section,:new.structural fill soils should:be suitable for supporting`slab-on-gradeconstruction., Immediatelyow bell*the:floor slabs;we recommend making"an allowance,'for placing a six-inch layer_of clean free-draining sand•or gravel which has less.than five percent passing,the No. 200.sieve. ,Thiscapillary break will guard"against:,wetting Of the floor slab:due.to:the' underlying;soil conditions: • February 9;:1996 Project.No. T-3065 Where moisture via'vapor transmission is not desired, a polyethylene vapor barrier should.also be installed.'We suggest that this,vapor barrier be placed on an initial four inch"layer of the capillary break material and then covered with the final two inches`to help protect it during:construction and to aid in:uniform curing of'the„ concrete floor For slab thickness'design,with'respect to floor deflection due to traffic and point loadings, a subgrade modulus of300 pound§per cubic inch(pci)can be.used ' Estimated' floor slab settlements of.less than 3/4-inch are expected.due:to post-primary consolidation.; This movement assumes that settlements due to required building fills would be allowed to occur prior to floor"slab construction: • 4.9 Excavations 'Excavations will need to be completed in accordance with local;,state,or federal, regulations: In accordance with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), inorganic soils encountered:at the site are, classified as Group_C soils:.Accordingly, excavations made within the native soils or fill at'the Sitee-greater than , four feet in depth but not exceeding 20 feet in depth will need to be laid back with side slope.gradients-of 1.5:1. As another option, a'trench shoring;box to support excavations-throughout the lower'depth",may be. used.in - conjunction with sloping of the upper,portion of the excavation as outlined above. Because .of groundwater seepage"within the upper fills, temporary, dewatering ;of the excavation may-need, to:be considered where excavation.depths ..exceed,two to three feet below existing site grade: Excavations below depths'of seven feet ' will likely encounter the groundwater table andrequire more intensive-dewatering efforts,to maintain trench 1 stability. 4.10 Utilities, We recommend that;all site'utilities be bedded and backfilled in accordance with applicable American Public Works Association (APWA) SPecifications.,= For site utilities within City rights-of-way, bedding arid backf ll should be completed in accordance'with City of Renton specifications: At a minimum, utility trench backfill should.be-placed and-compacted in accordance with recommendations presented in the Site Preparation and , "Grading section.;Where utilities will occur below unimproved areas, the:degree of',compaction be reduced to a.minimum of 90:percent'of the soil's maximum density,- as determined by the,referenced ASTM standard." i 1 Because of the .potential for, long=term .settlements, utility pipe,joints and connections should be,flexible; allowing for up toone inch of differential movement: - 4:11 Lateral Earth Pressures The:magnitude of earth pressure development'on retaining walls constructed.in loading dock areas will partly depend on the ualit .of backfill:': Where fill• is. placedbehind retainingwalls we recommend lacin and P. q Y ' P g compacting it as structural.fill:- The fill should be compacted to a.rninimum of 95 percent of its maximum dry • unit weight as determined by ASTM Test Designation.D-698 (Standard,Proctor): .To;guard':against the buildup, of hydrostatic pressure, wall drainage must also be installed as discussed in'the Drainage section: Page.No. 9 . - February 9, 1996 Project.No.T-3065 With granular backfill placed and compacted,as recommended and drainage properly installed,we recommend designing restrained walls for an at-rest earth pressure equivalent to a fluid weighing 50 pcf A value of 35 pcf . may be used where the wall is unrestrained'. These values do not include other surcharge loading such as from fill backslopes or adjacent footings:that may act on the wall: If such conditions will exist; the imposed loading . must be included in the wall:design. Friction at the base of foundations and passive earth pressure will provide resistance to these'lateral loads. Values for these parameters are provided in the Foundations section.. '4.12. Drainage Sur ace Final exterior grades should promote free and positive drainage away from the building areas at all times. Water must not be allowed to pond or collect adjacent,to foundations or within the immediate building area. We 'recommend providing a gradient of at least three percent for a minimum distance of ten feet from the building perimeter, except_in paved locations. In paved locations, a minimum gradient of one percent should be provided unless provisions are included for collection and disposal of surface water adjacent to the.structure. Subsurface In our opinion, perimeter foundation drains will not,be necessary if the area immediately adjacent the structure . is paved and .positive surface drainage is maintained-. If the grade'•is'not positively drained away from the structure or if it is landscaped,perimeter foundation drains:should be installed.. To guard against hydrostatic pressure development retaining wall drainage must be installed. We recommend ' -that wall drainage consist of a minimum-12=inch thick layer of washed rock or pea gravel placed adjacent to the: wall:. A four-inch"diameter perforated pipe should be placed on a bed gravel at the base:of the wall footing and gravel drainage column. The pipe should be directed to a suitable:outlet. 4.13 Pavements With subgrade soils prepared as described :in the Site Preparation and Grading section, suitable support for pavement construction should be provided. However,:regardless of the compaction results obtained.subgrades must be in a stable non-yielding condition prior to paving Immediately prior to Paving, the area of the subgrade • should be proofrolled with heavy construction equipment to verify this condition. The required pavement thickness is not only dependent upon the supporting capability of the subgrade soils but also on the traffic loading conditions which will be applied. For light commercial vehicles and typical passenger_ vehicle traffic;the following pavement sections are recommended:. • . 'Two inches of asphalt concrete (AC)"over four inches of crushed rock base (CRB) • Two inches of AC over.,three inches of asphalt treated base(ATB) Page No. 10 February 9,1996. - Project No. T-3065 F'or heavy truck traffic areas, we recommend the following pavement-sections: • Three inches of AC over six inches of CRB • Three inches of AC over four inches of ATB • - v. , •If there is a potential that pavement construction will be delayed until the wet winter months, the subgrade soils -'must consist of a-clean granular`material as described in the Site Preparation and Grading section. In addition, we strongly suggest that the subgrade be further protected by placing a:layer of ATB,'on which construction traffic could access the project without excessively disturbing.the subgrade soils:, The ATB thickness for this purpose should be four inches. Repair of failed-ATB areas should, be anticipated prior to.final paving. However, the overall integrity,of the subgrade soils will ,be considerably"less impacted if this„protection is• provided. : ; Because of secondary,.compression' of the clayey silt, .organic silt; or peat layers, some degree of 'post- ; construction settlement within the pavement structure should be anticipated. This settlement will probably result in some longitudinal and transverse cracking of the .pavement., Cracks in"the pavement should be sealed in a '- !timely fashion to prevent excessive surface water infiltration into the subgrade soils: 5.0.- , ADDITIONAL SERVICES Terra Associates, Inc. should review the.final design and specifications in order,to verify that earthwork and , foundation recommendations have been properly Interpreted arid incorporated ih the project design. :We should - also provide geotechnical services during constructionin order to observe compliance,with the design concepts, specifications, and recommendations. This will also-allow for design changes if subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. - - '6.0 LIMITATIONS: , • We prepared this reportin accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices.: This report'is the property of Terra Associates, Inc. and is intended for specific application to the Warehouse/Office:Facility project in Renton, Washington. This report is for the exclusive,use of Powell'Development.Company and their authorized reresentatives.•No other Warranty ,y,•expressed or implied, is made: The-analyses and recommendations presented in this report are based upon data obtained from the test borings drilled on-site. Variations in soil:conditions•can occur,the nature and extent of which may not become evident . : Until'construction. If variations appear evident, Terra Associates, Inc.' should be requested to reevaluate the recommendations iri this report prior to proceeding with construction. • Page No. 11 • , . . . .. . . • ' . . . , . - , - • •' • ' ..• - • . . ., . . . , • ,. . • '-• • •- _.„ . . ' . ,.. , •:,:i--,:••• -4-4.:At.. ..„, .-.- 7.7.:'r-NAiian •,.<64 . r - :es 11 .. . . ,• I - • 1w 1: . ti i, ' • . :,- , • - • . •• ..1t.isofir_ ,VF7= • • - • '!" . ,.. .. • ' • ' .)'' 'MYg: r." , .4" .''• - vow v.ruAsi: • •• • - '"- —'"AzZo'N ii ' '1.''''''', 2 Ne4Rc-•-:7-..\.-.. • , • - • - -... . -. d i. • ' • • 1s. Ntv,i---, .•:;* . air TEA , ." - . . . 4"4'44':-i, 'N . • 8 E NTO N s g IL. ST GMDI • • iii .S-F0 ON VILLAGE PL. •••••• • • '• S 11TH IT'', -..- • ..'s, s - '• .42:0",it=.4.4\\ • , • 91 , , , .. . .. . . . ,....; • • . . '' ' , ' r . .'sr 1•••.-,"-:• '' ' •• - . '. 24 ' 01E1 ' , ,, • . . ., ... ...., -•4: .. . . • __ .wggIIZ,..im...r------ 2141" , - . ...,is., ' \4 . ,....• ___......-_____..406,-.--.------:- Aggii i-1ziirw . 7'•, :N •-• _, 20 • ' L 1' s•os,- •,1) \ ti •/,;•,'. sw -1'•eil 16TH I., . s.r-niklri..,., . .. .,,, : ,. ....., ,../..,_ ,..I.,:. ,.....:.. .,. . , sr • S 16TH ST I 4.`......: ,••-•-• ; !•: - . -• 11._••4041.4 1A...1bA.-111----.'•-' "--L '•-:•- .•I--;11: 11 :' -, Iffilli. . ;W.. tim"man., .S • ' •'. .4. Za2., .,hIL:...,,,e47-.:-.• ...sr;f7:11.... ,.• : '• - -'764 , .:-...41,111,116,7-,-I4ii , •. -. r, -I - I.- • g, • ' = loo-111wrigh.,.„,, L°164". , a'• 7'. ' - : e sw mi.(Sr ::''''`7,.t.0 o • --- 4- "..- tri;s5 •.• •., • LONCACRES ,i;*.itt4) -' •7:r . • '2,314 'WU' • . S.?KW- 1 .• -71, ,ti a. . -ERAig RACE L% _ , SW 21ST ST• cr-..••,-• • •Z. • •Nt ,.„."•; . PUGET 91,1,/,*9 .' ., • , • TRACK . . •- • • ', . : . RAKER 81_,O.e 7- - II' 1/4E00 ' • • . •a sw zJits. ,.. _S_23149• •,:I ST'S .. ?,...,.7. •• '•.': ••• I ., srei 1.i . ' ' = ' . , $ . , ., ...• • , . 1 • _ ,. .. , • zi ' .- •--2 V i 4":,•"•- ‘c",6* ' 1-, 'r5,-j SE — .115.4T NTO N H . . _.. • r / 81.90 , , ‘ , % 1 - - FZ ' ' - . su . 27TH ., . . •- 4.- =1„,... 0, , i .s 27TH, ST 11,imo ,..,,._ - .• . ,• _ I e;. - — •„ TRECX INPoj, - '''' • N CT I ON ' ... .. . . e.. • , ,. . s p, . „....„ ,,,,, s sissr s.rt• •E.16TH SI 29TM ST rC" • , .• ', , '. 'I . IlL•29TH.ST'• : •7:II'L" . ,s•-.00..r, s••P' 6 ,ST • •' SE iirrx sr ' • • . - . ..- ,,. '' '• . , .' •• "' ,.25- '' :• a - 1. . .- I. ': . ' 30 -,c ',. .•' Sq..: '. 'U,. : . . ,../ ....-. .'7' .: . :' .. .. .- -,, . . ' ... N. 30TH - -• .- S' .-..; 3 -s;_ 4 • -r:- 4 29 : "I_ :"*I'U--, ' • • i . •. ..,ii.,.._.2g__.. - ' SE 169TH IL,, , I r • z , s 16971,,p1.)scni =, ,' SE-VWII ST' 7017••- - . ••Sr . . 14TH I -- ' '' ' -.C9' -- —=' . . . L ,- - SE , irdND .• ST .L ,. • 4 am - -''''.L *.'• I, • l l'' • , .r 1, ,,•. .. .' ,- . ' 111, - • I tlilOf L - .•t'' ' - W. ,•,, • - ' , '' •'„'7 I'.• ..• ".Oi.2_8TH -sw,58TH sr - ••I 4 s ST j"' . '. •ir , ' • ..".. SE 173R7 Si .. i CC ' /.. ' t.,31.., , , , sr,F .. .,,,„ S,174TH ST -.•'E 174Thl ST ' • • .. •4.,c1.1-\.• " '. -- . • 1 /A' .. • • - . ...cs> 7 R I I_l: S I T E 4157' ST • • • S. - g2 .0" ,,e,z,,... _,,. _ + , ,; • .ST ÷ '''' .ia . - .pi ...I ' S I so 17GT 1' eli ' , . • ,. ._., • 1 ,2,.... • ' .',. TILgitIr 1114,415.1 ...., .. . . 1" qt. ..., St 1795n I • , f .ii'-'43RDIL: 's-r,1 ilri-lw -• ..sw , • z'7= 3R0 / '. ;'. - -...isr s ° ' • ; - : '.:.‘•'4- ', go,, s,..."8": "....` • •• • ,i,• , 1C,. . ... •SESTS-Hr= _.•76. • ..e, •. ..''• • -••• ' I . . '•-I• ,•• , .- . i i R.; • • ..(;• _ ,,,orI • . . •f. . - ; •r '• ' I"- 4 ./. /. rt.P-1, -0-,, ' . ,,.,t, us?,„,,.. ..,,,. ., 1 ie,zi 71 .36, • ::„., . , 6,,,i, . Li..,it.,j -ct. . .. , . ,, .. Jim,p.,' , •• •.-•. : •,,:,. - . I, . .. • • . .2! _., 0,q ----. / I ' . . ,,, 4.1, : 46.. .,c...., ,,,,l •'sGp RREI NGsBER forK , to„ - .-‘1,.., c(il.n.„ il..„,...A,-/ , ,I 31 •, 1 , . , • co,4-SS , PC. Y. r • 2 e apc-,. • . . . , ‘i : 'c TOCI P' ' I • i . ....•., - ' 1 ''''' ..••••,• SE .! ... :.k/au -: 'j.-, :•2 • . , -' ', "• ".. 1 '', '..Z.,/,- - . , ., , - .,ti I. irjn' ,. • • - . ' . • . • IV, - 1.84;"= .°,- -, 1 .• . • - . -- •, . .4....1. . , . , ,,,_ .„.. i 1, _. : , .:•4-. .,. .': ‘‘ [ ,---1. Kt--IN 11 U I\I"s'l"---,8i;::717'-. ;•--'-1---''''''''- l'( '".0---'''sE`41:'il-NT:-4 f err )„,a f. ---7- ; • . '• . .. ST , /5 138TH'NT ' '1 . . 5'18.9s TH, ...ST' ' s• ' I 'STI .._ . •1 .1'., '• / " I . 11 • I r2:. S• 61' kij..;:f 1 •,•. , ..i . . ' : . I • '.t!SE :- i.'s‘" , • , SE IBSTO ST la',,,,,,,,,.4...,:,. . . , ' 190TH 1 , ST : ,.I ,, ,I , .,. ' 1907 ST', , " 1 5 .i9oTii IT! 'I/ ' . .. , 1. : , . r1907He 57 la .....,,„›* I ,. •C 1 I .,• ' ni- : . 1. 'i. ' . 0 .., V "". ''. Hi al', , -... "CIS Tx nil.,'' ) 'r. ' ' 41 ' • . 1!7" - S.-2.---'-7- - -S.. :.,1'•S'1 2NO... ST ' l'92NOI ST" ii S' 55TH Ilc" :ST • ''.- - "115''Tk 4%. 14' e, 'SE -' .•=1 ail' ^1.92 " ; ,•, . . . ,•- -.' Zi •,.41 ,_ , •' • 1 i , . , . if . : , sr .- • . -- • i 1 - i.- • =! ' vl :: 1 ' ' ' '';\- ''' ' °I'. - ''' '' ...,z,'. . • ;", ::-• . ._ . ., -- ' . ST '''' '''''4,I I ' '..,5, ig'ini I•SW 194TH ST 1 , .,-, I.- • x ›.q - -, I' r,..- 1 \ • - l: . ,.. - # . , ,.. ., ›.. ,• , '-?. • rt'.•ST ,• d . .•T.-7\:: .. -, ,..c -. `c; .: ' '2 -• ;L.—.''-i .--:- - - . _,. i I _ ,,,.,t i •.... i, ,i 5 1.96TIL ST ,‘5,..., 196TH - ST ''t :•'' 1,,; 1 , '. 1 .: ..,,..,,__... _ sr,iosT. 2.i si .,,. . 55,,195TH 5, • '- ' ' ' .I• g'' - I- - 1. '"' Ty- Isar)," 1 . , -.2 5 198TH ST . ; ,.. ,s 1 E - .''' • ' 9 ST'sr.,98N ST - ---7-1- . - ', rIAN--/- .. . - • );-: - - , . ,-. , . tni • . .`I_,.1).- - 1 - - - TH..,.5- 2f;'.. Rim 199 ' ,- . " •. . , S 200TH lir7r. n I on, sr •r, : j ' S, • •200TH 1 P, ..sr,. .1-- ',.E.: , ail sE ST 200TH .ST- I., . . . . . ' . • '. I ,- •ST l' ' - = I , '' • , -,• al:. . , - , • ! I- - -!: .. 1 1 , • . t,:_;-,,, . t . , E. t%1 ;,,t • 7,,, sr n•sr ,- ,1 , , ., . .. . .. s .,20290 ST - ,' .-! 5... - .,.1 't . ,?.'•--• • ' --'. . • • _ , , .. „ . . • . , , . • ., . , . • . . . . . ,. , . . • . . .REFERENCE:. THE THOMAS GUIDE, KING COUNTY, -WASHINGTON, "PAGES 655, 656,-:. 685 AND- 68.6,' 1995 'EDITION. . . . . . . , . . . .. ..., ..•• . . ... - • . . . . . . . . . . .. . • . . , .. , • „ . . . • ,,, .. , . . ,, _ • . . .. .. ,. • . , - .. ."' : v• ' '. '' ..--. :' • ... VICINITY MAP- ." •--- , • ' • ' . , . ., -. .' .- .. • .„ • . • - - _ ". WAREHOUSE/OFFICE- FACILITY -,- •• .• TERRA.' •' - - • .: .-, . . N • , - ' .. : ‘, . - . :' ' - .. ' - - : -- , , RENTON " WASHINGTON. - ' : • . '.. -'. • - • - ,S.‘ ASSOCIATES : , . : - - • .. . ' . . , • . . • . G.eotdChhiOal: Corisultants. . .• Proj. No.3065 . . Date.: •1/96 '.. , Figurd „- 1 - .. • • ,. • . . . , . •, - , . ,. ..•.. • , ., .. . . . . .... .. • , . .. . . , , . ... , . .. • . . . . . - . . .. • . .•' . . . . .. „ . . . . .. .. • . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . , , . . • , t 2, B-6 ' _ : PARKING PARKING . , C'7 PARKING 1 J PARKING . . LOADING- • - -. a »J ` . ' APPROXIMATE SCALE 100 0 100.. 200, feet BUILDING B 65,400 )F ! • cg N a . LEGE D: Zoo ` I r 4 BORINGLOCATION APPROXIMATE. ; �� •1 60 .•," LOADING 6D ` , i APPROXIMATE` BORING 'LOCATION }. - PARKING PARKING , 1. , FROM TERRA ASSOCIATES REPORT T-3064, DATED FEBRUARY, 1996. . , PARKING LIND AV REFERENCE: FACSIMILE OF .SITE' PLAN PROVIDED BY HORTON DENNIS -, : AND ASSOCIATES, .INC., JOB No. UNKNOWN, UNTITLED' . • . AND UNDATED.' 1 , EXPLORATION LOCATION PLAN ?-;—!``:r:.: TERRA WAREHOUSE/OFFICE BUILDING . ASSOCIATES.' RENTON, WASHINGTON otechnical Consultants Proj. No.3065 I Date 1/96 I Figure 2 STEEL ROD 'PROTECTIVE- 'SLEEVE; . ' , ( i • HEIGHT VARIES : SURCHARGE '(SEE NOTES) SURCHARGE OR FILL ' -• , . • • OR FILL • • I i. i %,/i,/i\i\i\v.\ii,ii.%\ I I ' //. %,%/: r\ /,/i NOT[ TO 'SCALE : NOTES: 1: BASE.-CONSISTS. OF 1/2" THICK, 2'x2'':PLYWOOD WITH CENTER,'DRILLED 5/8"-"DIAMETER HOLE. 2• BEDDING,:MATERIAL,.. IF .REQUIRED; SHOULD CONSIST_OF CLEAN' COARSE SAND: MARKER ROD IS,'1/2" DIAMETER STEEL ROD THREADED AT BOTH .ENDS. 4: .MARKER ROD IS 'ATTACHED TO BASE:BY NUT AND WASHER ON EACH SIDE OF ..BASE. 5: PROTECTIVE .SLEEVE SURROUNDING. MARKER:.ROD SHOULD CONSIST OF 2" DIAMETER . • PLASTIC:TUBING.. ''SLEEVE IS NOT ATTACHED TO ROD OR BASE: 6• ADDITIONAL SECTIONS OF STEEL:'ROD CAN` CONNECTED-WITH THREADED 'COUPLINGS. 7. "ADDITIONAL-'SECTIONS OF 'PLASTIC. PROTECTIVE SLEEVE CAN::BE CONNECTED WITH.:PRESS-FIT PLASTIC COUPLINGS. . : ; -', 8: STEEL'MARKER ROD SHOULD EXTEND AT LEAST,6" ABOVE TOP OF, PLASTIC PROTECTIVE', SLEEVE.' 9. STEEL MARKER ROD SHOULD EXTEND AT .LEAST- 1','ABOVE TOP OF"FILL SURFACE TYPICAL .SETTLEMENT MARKER DETAIL . TERRA :. WAREHOUSE/OFFICE FACILITY z RENTON;. WASHINGTON , ASSOCIAT'ES' • '"'otechnical Consultants Proj. No:;3065=' Date' ' 1/96 Figure 3 . SLOPE 12:1(V:H), GEOTEXTILE FACING COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL, MINIMUM WRAP (tYPical) 95% MAX:::DRY DENSITY f 2%,= OPTIMUM "MOISTURE CONTENT ,. • PER D-698'.(STANDARD,:PROCTOR) • . ' ' • 0.8H; feet (TYPICAL), • .. .. • 3 feet 1 , " ' - H feet = . � . ... � • .. ". •• .. : .. .� ,. 18 in. (max.). MIRAFT 5T; GEOGRID ' • • • (TYPICAL) • NOT TO SCALE REINFORCED SOIL WALL SECTION TERRA" L ` WAREHOUSE/OFFICE BUILDING ASSOCIATES • RENTON,. WASHINGTON. • otechnical a Consultnts Proj. No.3065 Date;•1%96; � :Figure"4 i APPENDIX A. . FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING. Warehouse/Office Facility • : - Renton,Washington. . On January 9, 1996,we performed our field exploration using a truck-mounted hollow stem augerr drill rig. We explored sub• surface soil and groundwater.conditions at the•site by drilling two hollow stem• • auger test borings to'a maximum depth of 29 feet below existing grade. An additional test boring was _ drilled on the adjacent Farwest Steel.site., This log is,included in Appendix A,as.Boring._B-6. The test'' boring locations are shown`on Figure,2. The Boring Logs are presented on Figures A-2 through A-4. An engineer from our office maintained a log of each test:,boring;as it was drilled, classified the soil • conditions encountered, and obtained representative soil samples. ' All soil samples were visually. classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System shown on Figure A-1. • is Representative soil samples were obtained from,the test,borings using sampling procedures outlined in ASTM Test Designation.D-1586 The samples were placed in jars or tubes (ring samples) and taken to ; • our laboratory for further examination and testing The moisture content of each sample:-was'measured and is reported on the Boring Logs. Plasticity characteristics of the fine-grained soils were determined by conducting Atterberg limit tests. Grain size analyses were performed on three of the samples: .The results of the grain size analyses are presented as Figures A-5 and A-6. . • • • • • Project No::T-3065, ' LETTER GRAPH.'. ' , MAJOR-DIVISIONS : ''' TYPICAL 'DESCRIPTION - ; . " SYMBOL_ :SYMBOL , GRAVELS ' Clean , ,0...0 Well-graded gravels, gravel-sand•mixtures,"little. G- ` - fines.= Gravels �Q.o.. , or-.no , ' 0 , - ;lab . • - (less;than : . ..'. Poorly-graded gravels,, gravel-sand .mixtures,'_little —i. 'co ai More than ''5.%.fines)'' GP. .... ..'. or no:fines.' • , - . p : • N 50%.of coarse ---- ;-- Cl) S fraction is . - -- = i' Silty'gravels;:gravel-sand-silt mixtures,,.non ' ' ,3'a� GM C lastic'fines.- • gip: ,a� >. , _ •larger•than .No: Gravels .•`p �`,'. .� ::'-; � . , ,_: �, w v°''' 4 sieve: . with' fines . Z 1=,N • • yey'gravels, gravel-sandclay,mixtutes, plas• tic_GC. - . �/....,ci,. -fines: cp.-PI', Clean :•`;' Well-graded, sands, 'gravelly'sands, little.or C7 ,.'SANDS toSUV >iiii gi< :; 'Sands ....<< :>:::;:>:><:::>::,<; ,no:fines. -`�.� -� - .. ; . co z ' - less.than. . ;^;:�'.yis'sr,' �'' � L More`than •_� •.� o - , .�> Poorly-graded sands-or:gravelly sands,-little ' �,. _ c . , .50% of-.coarse•`' S/"fines) . SF`�,:. ,or.no fines.; . , • �f�r.:�.::Y•:ss • O m,ram, , ,fraction is :-:::= -- U.- o `Silty.-:Silty. -silt, mixtures,:non-plastic fines. smaller tfian : $M >s's' ` ? <c: '' , 'No:'4"sieve: Sands' !<::>:::<::s,:::..::: ,. . . ' , . - .: with.•fines' - I':> < ..:..; .; •: , . • SC '�:<>';�`:;�',`: Clayey.sands, sand�clay mixtures, plastic'fines: '. :Inorganic silts:and.very fine-sands,'rock flour, silty or . .':fin :• N•, ' ' SILTS AND CLAYS IVI L -'clayey fine sands.or•clayey silts with slight plasticity.,, �' ,',,Inorganic,clays,of.low to medwm;plasticity, gravelly ., '- •N- - .Liquid limit,,is,less:than 50% CL ��' clays; sandy,clays; silty, clays, lean clays:• Lii ' o. ._ '' • - - , ';OL.-. - 1i1i1i i1i1'1!1:i.'Organic,silts.,'and,organic-clays. of Iow,plasticity. N. C`,,'` . , Inorganic siltS;:micaceou5 or diatomaceous fine SILTS.AND CLAYS sand or' sil soils;=elatic: MH - , o•c. .liquid_ limit-is. greater than 50% ,CH Inorganic clays'of high plasticity, fat clays •, E , - - i i i Ii i l l i '. -. Organic clays.,of medium to.'high•plasticity, -. �, . OFi. • , , 1 1 ,'I 1 1 organic..silts. ' : Peat and other,:highly,organic soils, HIGHLY ORGANIC ,SOILS' =�' '. � PT" ;,�;,fi^r. DEFINITION OF- TERMS AND' :SYMBO'LS ' , : W • Standard Penetration 2. OUTSIDE DIAMETER.SPLIT: - .- Density Resistance in :Blows/Foot .:.:T...'' . ' •.SPOON"SAMPLER ., . 1/er loose 0-4 2:4 :INSIDE DIAMETER RING SAMPLER ' e7 ' y,' OR'SHELBY'•.TUBE..SAMPLER,= '; - ° • Medium.dense ` 10-30 - ,�_P SAMPLER•PUSHED ` ;o. Dense' '' :.30=50 '. . C, , ':SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED ' ' 5 , 0` Very: dense � , a. r , cn • Y _. . •,SZ WAi'ER LEVEL (DATE); � . ' ' O • .WATER''OBSERVATION`STANDPIPE',; • •Standard Penetration " ` - - C ''.TORVANE READINGS,.,tsf. _ '.,consistency,'-:Resistance:in 'Blows Foot ,.. ' ': .}.' •Y'' / : qu••�„ RENETRQMETER READING;.asf %:. ' c�� ,: Very soft. • • 0=2.;- , : • -. MOISTURE,,percent of.dry weight Soft, '2-4 - ;pcf.: -DRY• DENSITY;,."pounds,,per:cubic foot • , °_-, ,Medium stiff, . •:48.. � - LL ; LIQUID-LIMIT, percent .: �_' Stiff 8-16` ' ' - Very..stiff 16-32'2 . = PI PLASTIC;INDEX. ,. ' ' '. _ Hard • - . >32. ' • • . N STANDARD PENETRATION,:blows;per foot, SOIL. CLASSIFICATION "SYSTEM' '.WARE:HOUSE OFFICE. •FACILITY z -RENTON: WASHINGTON - . { , ASSOCIATES`'. . . '. , . . .. . . • 7Geotechnical Consultants -, ..- , ' r - i ' Proj: 'No: T-3065 Date..1/96 .figure:A-1 . :Boring-. No. .. -1- . Logged:•by:. KPR':_ ' • •: = " Date: 1%9%96 ' { • Graph% 'a - (N)-- 'Water 1 , .. - • Relative . '.:Depth Blows Contnt_". . USCS,- "-. Soil.'Deacriptipe Density . , (fit:) 0. o cr> foot (✓�) .:•$f!'{„"%i::,y., -.Gray.SAND with gravel and'silt -• :< fill• cuttings,s 'saturated bearing', '-. - ' • !, ;<o...>:••, moist at.2 feet , '. .. . . • SP-SM .` ., > >: 37 9.7 t- >f '< FILL: •Gray SAND With Silt and few • . , - • :<!:.::> `:>:>;,.; Dense.. gravel;medium-grained;moist. . • . - n'e n"' .Dark brown silty PEAT, _ I . ) fi n',Frill An amorphous,wet. :: , ' ,'Soft I 3 59.6 ' Initially no ; ' nnnenen • recovery. , " Re-drove . -, • - ML • � • Gray to brown=clayey-SILT, - . !� Medium Stiff sampler._- ;C-L-//• low plasticity, saturated. .. - , , 7 64.4 :> ▪ Nis;;«»,; •• - %: :c..A Brown-to gray,SAND, fine.to" Loose• : :' ;very fine-grained;.saturated• : - ' • 10 • Yf' :: '10 to 11.5 feet.black SAND ' ' r:f..<:f, 21. 25.4 :,« >,;::f r •"with•silt;fine grained;saturated: Medium,Dense <:F:y " ' ):+ggi< ::! r,' Black SAND, as.ebove,but'with• 21. . _ 27.1-' - ' ' , • , :,�::f, .;f !;xA. Medium`Dense,,.'_ - ' ,.'I , . :>!:.,;: ;•:::!.;...,trace of.silt. ,: :: :., .,, . ..,, ..,, :,,,,.,. .. . ,,,,..., . ,. ,.. ,.. . .. ..,,. ,. .,. . .; ...,,, , . i ,_ • , .. ,:„„„„„„:.„„,„„„„„„„„„„„„ . •: ..- . :•, .•. , :• •• _ . .. . ::::::::::::::::::::::•::::::::::::::::::::: • . •• • • •. . _ . • . . , . . , . .. . , • . • di . , . :,,,.., Black SAND me . . . dium 51 2, . . .. , 4:4 • > ' : " • `:,' coarse-grained, saturated: �� '.Very,Dense . _ �• T; -, , • TI 3ss `z •s sc . Black SAND;medium=grained, Very Dense , ' 7 /10" 21.2 to hee to»: ;s».s„,sN:<,s ' .0!;v •" .#: saturated. . , %' control he ave: • <'LSP .i - " ! ' .__ • ?�%$ ▪ $g 'Black SAND• as above. Very'Dense ._ ." 30.0.' Test boring terminated at 28.5'feet. '.,. ''' - ' ' - . Hole.plugged�with;1'bag of bentonite,chips mixed with cuttings! - , •-Ponded surface;water. _ ' _ ' ': Groundwaterencounterd at 7.feet: -'` BORING LOG ` . ' " ` • TERRA td WAREHOUSE/OFFICE--FACILITY:,. .. . :::>::: .-V-1: ' . '. RENTON, WASHINGTON , . - . . s 'ASSOCIATES ' s. - . - . . •I ' -, ' . Geoechnical COnsylnts - ' ' - - - - Pro .•No. T-3065 Date., ' Figure"A-2 ' , .