Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA97-092 2 : .. / -- / __. .., 4 ) '-.------ -- 1 7 2 0 4 • . /1 4 0 0 1 -.1/ •.• • / / •c; , ..• •. . . . ! I .-y. C : • . Z .• r :: . / ...,/ i ..I I.f. 0 0 - o . . _ J ,,• ti. 0 ..••• : C) •L • ' ...- / _:-/-)/ ... 6') ... 1.$ .* - I / -., e' -•/, A. ÷/' or A 11 168 ' -I- 186 / .f 181 0 1 ' / I' __-,., 163,,o.z.i.,.• 0 '1, - Z . i J.'"r lr . 4 4 . 11/ LOT 2 ) , ,., _ , -• / '2) • N I N. ••0 Y :. :' 1, I' " 1SC : 1 4, t, a) ••,.,, z. i . - • 1 _%o .x r c) • A• 9 ! 1 S fa 4.2•7.4c ...••2 . C• . •0...../ • •• e +4., „--.•r-• f1.•k r [-- 1 . , „ q : 44,64 / 1 ; LC' 1 . - c in ; 1 "$0.... le° 11 _ , • . ..., vo.,:e......$ .. •$.1 ., -7 • feit,1...-... e 527.5 4 • IILZ 4' •.7 '" .4• I ;I: / ..: LS i Il . Ri•fre4.1 ek't, 4 ZIJ 4.--j SE. 76TH ST.hil .....,Al;, . %. ,-- - —..---. — • r , .., — .. ...--- Ve41-47.e7.4/ Z.,rah, 00.5 4ZA 3 ,„.... •M 41.ely V kt 1 0 ..'. e'S,-- 4:.1.1 t—t7E.i.raci rtr4.--4 5 la . z • I V,.0 ... ,... ,:r. . / 7 je ..•- r.,4_ f=5,.. • r , 4 . / 7 3 I • . 2 a..—\SC) . 1 0 • ( •,/ „ , •c,.. ,1 /,.. I \.\\N I : e. : '....'. . )r) er I , ... .• V) II CO •S 0 i • -• C4,+ ,4 Lot 2 re i ,-- 1 .0 . t1'.V/1.:1 •.••••....,.:..;: 6'i./•t•ftS,o.4t/e61,‘.I I 17.w1',,V1:4•.1,6P0•.•oj_&tr4.,L',‘...i:.._1.r1_• .:•II, $C'-B, s,,•.- ..•..)•c7,.) . 1! - 82 67 •6.07.i4.• .•.,..4 .r'. 4s2t, I. 4A /I/ 1. - •:; ,6•..N A4s 4o411., •• ••0,014‘- V t 1 4- 6 •11 , .1 i ... •• ... .0.1* . ,e ; • ., cr) ,..... '" •••• - .r) I•••••-•, ,4 i :"til_ • • . • . L CO 7 :.• z z 2 •., Lot I A p 1r•.' 6 • - . I i t.1 ... OP.•.I.o.II t .1, ... 1 • .1,‘ 1L41 1111111111.11`, ' : 8 , 5 t(^ - . ..ya O ••i•:.. 4 4 re174 4AI,Jr B.IL 4 ,_ _ , - i. ..,• 07 eV!Ake . . . . '...i." . •• • -.., ii ,, ,tp.o.,••17dr 4 . iip•.,, ol'V.0 40 :. •Z.Vt.214C 4' 1 1...:;"").^ 1 6. I 4' 0 :: LI ^'•.:c,,, e"0. ; ° V.•. 2„..., ar l••"...-44-k, . " ,,., 4 i Ct:?1 . ,_„tor & '••••• •,.,e.'...' • 4. .',6 ---4,.^- --- t. Clit \,..,,,,A,A,A...."-Atrii .7.a.44* :::#4 •P/it. •......'Sr # 1 . ui 1 1 ..„21'1::;•••• .W .1,,.., - V•184 . ! ; 4';„.0, V— ....... 1 ' 183 7r1,4 it 4 166 $ / ) N. 4. ,; )-.• a)• •4 ,. ',..c. I.'..,_,..5, • ci /lb-C 0 '4:: ''-'4%• *,\ ta V — I i • 4 . , .,•. oc .. ••••ty 45.0f..4 ..k 3 AD , i.- .,•110•413•014,... . . ; :',1 ‘. /fi/.,fi • L OT ? ,, PEN SP 011-87 ' 8802169005 ci • . . / 7:-..,. .:74, ••:.-,,,......" I,,,„„ .,. i, --1CORPORA, . 1\ , -- -TE- i.- [lc) I/ (2) (2 I "k: ' ..: i 4,,;,/ / s 1,052 86 . Z. i-' , 91313 2 1 111 ‘0- 111 r (2) 2 820C8ji24e 33ei-i0 .._..o 6z3 5,L 1g1,3,1_6•5v6 S_T 0HEM 185 167 3„ •,S„7..D ••.E,1K)_2l3,°4,_,„s0,,„19 1 2[1• 4.1 7 (I) ljt. it)N"1.; 60 „„ ," TS OR 465069 1II .0,8 ,3' v. 9 - • , I PEN TON Cr). f=ra-_ _Ft 1=1 a 1 184 183 I l't, .7-.. k 1 illesi\Ill I:.,,,S IN: 7::: 165 ' t t ..'::' Iv 1,§6 1 .„ \ Li ': In . (3) '. % ' 1 ''S .i .1 SP.01187 1': e 41 I ! i "....' ..-- o ....._.) it-, m 4=1013 a r3.1,!..o.., or. .._ ...'', • wpsers. rALz WESTERN WIRELESS 3 330120M AVENUE NE,4110 • Dvsnw Face BEAT TIE.WASHINGTON 23016 PHONE (206/451-1250 _X _X_ X_ _ X _ _ X _ _X X x X X X X FAX t206)461-7OW 2On i i CArz e II'�� aOi ati ja1Cl`l BEN so. W SEi - F CONCRETE PAD �X bTM Oxus PEVIB15Ei } I Ex5mL5 FENCE I 1(2116 ♦ c `Xw��.�� - Q wrz vv v~ WW1 REVISED ran-2 ♦ ti -- X X >- . ♦ _ I } % Q S OF PROFOSEDLLCM.. I >- ▪ & . • • BUILDING E FN 9 --- x} e 3 " • .. . >• R S >. n / CC.ICArrz F O... paowagx�':;h ( SIX} Eft¢ >' ASHITECT S o al m:te.nrt-Iw Lom....i♦ ♦ I x; 3 I ).., ll 3} Q PRODLCED X>' a Sa• ar FOR �ce OHee NO IOT OF ME Cs..flElt IT.N.FlIAITS. I > I SITE NA. I >-' I EXTENDED MERCER scam TH • SHURGARD STORAGE x} - >- 15,>£ I >- • 8E3-411-A I >- 3_ 15.woORE1 I 1 >. I7T55 NE.4/5T11 ` 'X> > RENTON.HA.48056 M15G.INFO I ;. I I S•ffT RRE I I > PROJECT PLAN > _i x>- `€ •»oE > I I I FLAN N.:DO NOT v BUILDIN5C > ze ` i"�" 0i5ePoFF ALL OME115.15 > ? A-1 I PROJECT PLAN 0 . SCALE, V4.r-Cr I e 1 I.1 m e 3 4 WESTERN WIRELESS 330 120th AVENUE NE.6110 SEATTLE.WASHINGTON 68006 3 PHONE (206)461-1260 FAX (208)461.7857 / f MICRO FKILItt / F FIIlFO- FALLT- MEMO P1.1,1 zaluc 1.110w Mr 1 '114 W.' Nrrtrewscl ' _ —u..loc e.SET Y wser t. TD9DF moo$ I T i TO. wa Q 6TFI NESI'tD T-IA-]' i ® . EV.MONAZE 4 +0 6 , . k ® . • 1 S • 1 MVO 9 ":..F.N & ARCXREcrs ti SEATTLE RE$Diu--Oiom—*w 0 i a i j 6UFilY.FCUOAT.1 OF nE IIS COFT.5101,0�W ne Sat,FOR 1M Of ITE sou 1✓BRmLTIw Oft 10E 6Fies Ma..AMR. .111 COK.vAD fOtTUp0 F6v. wcs\Y�TorwTlax of .1 THE TUaTTE>ttBitY TOF nE GHFA / v00 F RBrt IS FC.110,101 t £ • 5 (`'rtE �� p SOUTH ■I■I■I■I■I•I•IIlIli/ir: :: ..-...... aood - 14fr Nneca c SE3-41 A 1 '' mss N.E.46114 - 1 NENrON.NA.48056 N15L.INFO 15KET n„E • EXT.ELEVATIONS z i • - € A-2 VAST ELEVATION '=i—:---. SCA)E. VD••r-Cr I I SOUTH ELEVATION r SCALE. VD••ro• 12 II I a0. E.,.•,.I 7 7.wwes ern PARCEL $13jp 1125 $ 26.1 { a.00•I x'o, ��y'+. CMO I y:0.4 �f < b. e85 l I T•6 FENEE '- WESTERN WIRELESS _ _ _ _ __`�.__ - --- - --_- - - • 9301201f1 AVENUE NE OHO rvoutt L•E p SEATTLE.WASHINGTON 88006 r��- - ------ & western , i STREET 'a. wir IEaST�MIANk t a essNMRTMPUPET.TOTA. SITE NAME EAST.13.81.5 • E. 1 a EXTENDED MERCER SOUTHSHURGARD STORAGE • —• _ } •— SiTE NUMBER• • SE3411A • • • R• all • F x 5 OWE 00 POT VERM gN3b016\ - PPOPE4tt LOE 3 ZED 1 1 SITE PLAN _ SCALE. r•To .o r6004 56 CCW.enED MD 6 PE SOLE .... •• •. .I i Ot IE£6Tx5�ORF.,IFOPII NPR, CGNTAUEO.IT I5...ER vaezardsmarkt NI NAME, `91!ID , PAGE 5 . nE rwrTEN P0a•v�lMll OF DE aaErt e�..m....>^aN.a a ....ate LOT Ta 1.16 WATT MORT s ms TT..bsoo wsam®uaeE w t TOW,. NR�& `P BEIM m S�tJ61011 OF TWLT b] �& rR YTE RAN E6EWL viP6uTM1 I wvE wz 8151011113 PLATS.P.E 8 a ME MOIR.Iil < SIW6/AD u6nnmorw.PAR.. •TO DE RAT 110768.RECORDED NV..11 4 •@a• m TOERDRMTNANEAbBrtFLDDEREY�.68156NO MUTES OVER fNM ...bOb NMAEY•re:an a E)(iBlDEDW6iCERSOUiH n ua-,uo•m OF i2NfON 24 LL/�•A51FASl.�KaG TIE PIST LOE 6IOT I. svallE Iv.RE. 1 ,a . ,NE.111 ST. FIWY E•63MIa.MMS I Of:"A`T u'"NUTY;1AMS E ��"� SHURGARD STORAGE NIISH.TOI 6.AOBI OF EP.ATOM.TO SEATTLE,MORON•J 1 5,Fw1I.P8FYi ran rn.nae Too w. .—,. v SE.TbM 51. AGCOA•16 TO TIE PLAT,Ib6 F.CORDED M,roWE n 6 R„TS S.lO IAM AVE.ME•Iq A-] ERE.,ELEVNIoxs I iaw i Et m ...ew I F PAGE 0.4<O�OF M.CCU.. E N.4116TOM ; re 1.138 CONTACT.R.Nd RE SE3 411-A w• wma w wK x oeeka mL.n mr yin wvv.•v i R = wreum• .Tar. .ants IC5121011•RESS MM.as �� y — �CORR. PP •.�E SHEETE ki Pew e ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION re,, 1 AlIMIN, „, „T INDEX < I I m e., ao-1 ;, n.. • M ? . .- - __.._.___ _ , PIARI..16 TOTAU FIRM AT II!RV OP ASaIDR. Fr RE .e r. m 7 C fuss N.E.48TH x mn.a....e. areie NO 1� ? ICI r_ 6�5 Z�Na ARFA�PARlFI �ARat.tummies), OOGIENT REVIEIi w RENTOt{WA.4B056 9 RR.I06 -08 14.. LAMS. MI$G.ItFO S�TTtE w.ab ARTS., wv °°�a•®I n .mac m.m u- f.N61621.3205 Yre AOFYroN _ _ .2 I MEET nRE ROS/622-1651 ER!!4T,ON P O 04 L 0 ® �� 0y CONTFLT.Sr04001( Do. CITY OF LEASE T�}vn6 'I SITE PLAN CA- 4-4I.E. __B_L� wp5.17DDT GENERAL INFO ©• GET.REIECHEE PT.FFY.6 WARECTEO OYAI [O FTtolsT w NORFA.ACE64E. uw- c • ® 6EVATNa1 REFD✓HCEEl) . 6 µ YJO'FROM ANYR.ORIDCONS.Iw.5. ; rREfT AMER o-N ABBREVIATIONS & SYMBOLS VICINITY MAP NT.S - PROJECT TEAM PROJECT INFORMATION :: APPROVALS T-1 '.I•I I • i 334330 0800 lhi i 334330 0820 , . 334330 0842 ICOSOLIDATED CAPITAL INS LI Martin Seelig June Olive Huson 5520 Lbj Fwy #430 H PO Box 1925 ; , ' 11030 SE 76th St Dallas TX 75240 Bellevue WA 98009 Newcastle WA 98056 1 1� — 1 334330 0843 , ' 334330 1100 I 334330 1105 HAL REALTY V INC ; KIEWIT CONSTRUCTION CO R H MAY CREEK ASSOC 2125 Western Ave #300 i11000 Kiewit Plz I ' PO Box 1129 Seattle WA 98121 ( Omaha NE 68131 .11 ! Bellevue WA 98009 I ' I - --J 334330 1120 334330 1120 '334330 1120 Campbell Holdings '. Campbell Holdings . !Campbell Holdings 1800 E Imperial Hwy #120 , ! 800 E Imperial Hwy #120 . 11800 E Imperial Hwy #120 Brea CA 92821 1Brea CA 92821 HBrea CA 92821 I ' , I ' I C. 334330 1125 11334330 1125 )1 , 334330 1125 IDS & SHURGARD INCOME GR iIDS & SHURGARD INCOME GR ; ! IDS & SHURGARD INCOME GR 1201 3rd Ave #2200 I0_201 3rd Ave #2200 '1201 3rd Ave #2200 Seattle WA 98101 ; Seattle WA 98101 'Seattle WA 98101 . 334330 1125 II 334330 1140 334330 1150 IDS & SHURGARD INCOME GR Ili Michael Deitch Ming-Tsong Kao 1201 3rd Ave #2200 ' ' l 4126 187th Ave SE j 16131 NE 42nd Ct Seattle WA 98101 Issaquah WA 98027 Redmond WA 98052 J 334330 1180 - - �l — •- - ( DENNY S REALTY INC ; j , i 293 E Main St Spartanburg SC 29302 I1 -=-—; L , , 1 ; I 1 11 --] I , 1 1 i 1 , ' . 1 . 1 1 1 V • YkYkw em • WESTERN WIRELESS 330 120th AVENUE NE,0110 • SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 88006 PHONE (206)451-1260 FAX (206)451-7587 • LEASE PROPOSED IMGRO-ANTENFIJ-i FFGLItt -__ ______ / -PROPOSED-17ALAD-ANfE1NA FACILITY Z�� T / _ pAT! ''''``''''''���� 04JRE41 ZONING REVIEH TOP OF NriE O � EL N7O0 ♦ 71.1NETI REVISED ICONS SET I _ 41-11g==j, TIJLYTI REVISED ZONING SET TOP OF HONOFOLEO _F.. REVISIONS EL Ee5.0 NO. WE A 6I271 7 REVISED T-IA-2 L .. � • • 0 . • by-f7 MONOPOLE I . • ® - � • A A . I I ARCHITECTS sP.SITI ■ NA9N 6TOM iw SEATTLE (ZOOM.am VSI832-1w II I� THIS DRAHN6 15 GOPTRISNTED AN?5 THE SOLE PROPERTY OF THE OHER_ IT IS PRODUCED SOLELY FOR USE 67 THE OMER AND ITS AFFRIATES. REPROI K•710N OR USE OF THIS CRAMS AW/CR TIE 11FOFC OATION CONTAINED IN IT 15 FORBIDDEN LOCATION OF RADIO EGUIFTENT I • Hl/1CUT TIE HRTTEN PERMISSION OF THE OHER I _ LOCATION OF RADIO NEH LRAM-LUK GATE - — EGUI 517E NAPE _ tte: FEN bHIEN GMI NAU. I M1 i NEW b'HIGH C HALL i EXTENDED MERCER SOUTH E)U5TIN6 FENCE Ie =j= r' ry: I I / • / SHUROARD STORAGE -1E '`:3�v. f{ . "'?:`:5:' (TNERBrM04NSwL IiI J3 A 1 �.. TOP OF FOUR EL DOD'ASSUED 517E MEIER 41 SE3-4H-A SITE ADDRESS • 1TI55 N.E.4BTH RENTON,WA.4E056 • MISC..INFO . I SHEET TTE I EXT. ELEVATIONS SHEET NMBER I A-2 WEST ELEVATION '-.,.r= 5f4%LE. tier=r-o' I I SOUTH ELEVATION °ZT scALE, we=r-o' 2 I PLOT SCALE.I•.1•I 1 w em to AT 3INIits WESTERN WIRELESS . FENCE 330 72081 AVENUE NE.9110 EXISTINSE%STINS FENCE SEATTLE.WASHINGTON 98005 PHONE (208)451-1250 X X X X X —X X X X X FAX (208)451-7887 • 20'-O± EMI DAM O4J1NE9'I ZOUNS REVIBi SET e -0 OILL ER1 ZOwms SET / 111t / 9'-O•i CONCRETE PAD X 21J IERI REVISED EOSINS SET 4 ITJLY9T REVISED ZOOMS SET n / 3'-64 3'6•1 4141Vt / REMOVE EX1STIN5 FENCE . EISSTINS REMAINS HALL REVTSONs ND. DAM .71 0 6/21All REVSED T-LA 2 Q / 0 • pp I 1 / IE.H 6'HUSH QV HALL;MASONRY IL ' aQ / - TAID STYLEO MATCH E)aSTMS INCOLOR I / 4 PROPOSED LOCATION L . BUILDING E LLI § / —�` X OF RADIO EallPtENT 1 / s B' . " � I / CONCRETE EGJPI£NT I I /. PAD % 4 IDIDFVLE FOIRDATION PER M41.FACTUiER5 RECCMFEHDATION " ♦ �! 5'CHAIN-LINK SATE M A 6' :.:i: •:?+:: \ `•:-,L OPENRIS IN TFE NEN C171 HALL :• ::::::. :: Z. 1\ ���FI. MCNOPDLE AxCHITECIS �+di MC 872121'+a •AVN n�wia SEATfIE (mom-sera irman-1cr \ L \ ` Io of —_....... .._.. ...... • / 5 6•i I, I / 17 • 6 2-O'/X• / 10'-0• / I • THIS5 C DRAHMS O ITSE+iRD AND 5 THE SOLE PROPERTY OF TIE OIEER. IT IS PRODUCED SOLELY FOR USE BY TIE OHER AND 115 AFFLIATES. ' X REPRODUCTION OR USE OF 7H5 DRAHNB AND/OR THE I/FORMATION CONTAIIED IN IT 5 FCR JDDEII MITHCUT THE HIRTTEN PERMISSION OF TIE 016732 ' • 1 NAME • EXTENDED MERCER SOUTH X• SHURGARD STORAGE • SITE TAMER 8E3-411-A e 517E ADDRESS 17755 N.E.48T74 X• RENTON.WA.48056 I MISC..INFO • SIEET TITLE _____ _ - - _ , PROJECT PLAN X NOTE• zeD 5VEE7!AMBER AN 15 A DIASRAIMATC REPRESENTATION BUILDING G R ONLY.DO NOT SCALE VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS. i A-1 PROJECT PLAN -�; ' SCALE. I/4•.I•-O• I I PLOT SCALE.I••I• 3D3'O'. 7T 20em .:: ARCEL1330 1125 2D'4! L 2404! 5 90O't 20 O s A. • 1 g�6� WESTERN WIRELESS EXISTING FENCE 5 6 Y- _X- - -)C.. -Y - .>( /I\-- `a. PROPERTY LINE- - -_ - • 4 ♦ 330 1201h AVENUE NF f110 /\ '� „�} 3EATR$WASHINGTON 88005 11 4 ; \T- EX5TTN6 BULD%TA D05196 KADIN&'E• !; 1 n FAX PHONE (200)161-7887 p nel \ " PRD.ECT LOCATION western RELEASE , 11 . J� �c STREET - —-- ;'•. z::; :•'' PAM- 04 B Em ZowNs REVEN 5Ef ::g. wireless D4UE41 ZONH6SET \\ ::j 21.LME41 REVISED EOM%SET 7 EXISIUU6 DINT ANTENNAS ••••••••••••: ••.•.•.•�'.,^ ^•••••.=+::i5 n.LLY41 REVISED ZDNH+6 SET • MOUNTED TO PARAPET i (5)TOTAL • Us ' 1 1›RTTIN6 PAIEL ID . IKlFs( ANT@11�5(6)TOTAL , m 1 o o p r R. SITE NAME: REVISIONS EXI571N5 STLDING'C' E)II5T,N5 RILDR16'C'° ° 1F F - r LONER ROOF IPPER ROOF O• F N DATE ° FJ05TN60?l mpg -= EXTENDED MERCER SOUTH 16 REVISEDT4A-2 ANTENNAst31TOTAL g m S H U RGAR D STORAGE 4 —X X X -X .&119 0 . . I EXISTM6SALONS Il`3 5 SITE NUMBER: A . - (:.•1 • ; i ,_ Jx 4 SE3411-A 4 1 —\/N/\ . r __,, I \ EXISTNN6 BALMS I, 9 3 1-X x x x x • 1 m r' ARCHITECTS a s 10� FI-• mama lmepa-aurna�� IP" ue•w ssos IMWm-T'LSf 'II K i i NOTES, L tJIIS7IN5 FSNGE 383'O' r . L -X- �- - 7C 1 -X� --X—�(- -7—X— Tx — • T —X Tom —X— - x- - 7C •\ ' I.517E PLAN 15 A DI -• TIC.REPRESENTATION PROPERTY LINE ONLY,DO NOT SCALE;VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ED 2.VERIFY ALL FROFERTY INFORMATION ON Z SITE SITE PLAN 0 5 '° '° 5r.,LE, THIS CRAMS IS LOPYRIEFRED AID IS THE SOLE -- PROPERTY OF THE OWER IT 15 PRODUCED SOLELY FOR USE BY THE OVER NO ITS AFFILIATES REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS DRABS AND/ORS TIE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN IT 5 FORBIDDEN Ae AR Rawln.w BOO 511100 jQpD -- - DESC.RIPTION, f SITE HALF. 512.211112531 �P�A,,ee�Fp� �p�p�.� . W1NUY THE SR1TEN PERMISBION OF THE OMlER oar move 711, . e••m. H.n .ne.os� LOT 2 KM COUNTY SHORT PLAT 14650 4.RECORDED HOER RECORDING .er. � � SN.R6ARD STORAGE 5�111-A 1lSr.e MO MOM. .wlm.o .W¢aoDD s eDln. IU6ER D61273L555,BIND SHORT PLAT BEING A El OFISION OF TRACT I62 MO ner w...a ewes wet wem.wL WI 5.1M& T-I 517E PLAN GEBtAL UFORMA7ION SITE NAME .A tax 9l co.LD HILLMANS LAKE NA�IRN6TON GARDEN OF EGs,::d.VEO 14 TO SEATTLE EL e�.AO M, MOW % smcnor.o. DIVISION ACCCRONS TO DE PLAT THEREOF.RECO:1XX N VOLIRE II .t.. ..01115.D.sww m .6. OF FLATS.PAGE d.N KM6 COADY,MIA. 17755 NE.46TH SR-REAM RETINNONAL PARTNERS tea, [Lax MOLE WO ...u,,,,,, Y erWILE6 sim TOEsNTER NTH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS EGRESS AID UTILITIES OVER RENTON,Y1A 9D056 1201SEA TARO A.4E SITE 2200 en eaD.osrA.awW LA •�CAA M C o TIE SOUTHERLY 24 FEE 9.51101 - T,AS MEAS RED ALONG TIE EAST LINE OF LOT 1. . EXTENDED �/y � 5EATTLE 14A 9Biq p� �/ ��� p�•� �a�/V/��f1 • CITY OF RENTON LLA-0IS-02,RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY AUDITORS SI 1 SHU�RD STORAGE ORAGE Li COL.OVA .6 101 SM. 5.1 VIM , NE 46TH 5T. FILE M D30IZA003,BEDS A PORTION OF;TRACT IDS.CD NRLMAN`'LAKE com.. M� OM r'� WSWNETON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEATTL E,DM510N.3 YESTERN NRRE55 • A-I ROOF PLAN Cf.. COMM. TOLL TO.W/a.YJEr! 5E 167N ST. A ACLORDU76 TO THE RAT THEREOF RECORDED N VLLU¢II OF RATS. 3301201h AMBLE NE CIO A-2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS LSM ro, in Mr OF.aeo..arrNlw,ar PAGE DI,RECORDS OF KING LCLNTY NA. SEATTLE,NA5NNDTOI 4E005 SITE N NVER ca. octets .ou. .er wr a • IOC MOM CONTACT. RICK TUdR1RE • w. CLL. .er•.ta KTAL SE3-411-A OTL OM O. DECAL ii 5.1461 CAMEO •. MSC 1.611111165 Vm. .e.ry a I PEST[RII PRISM PROPOSES TO COWTRGT AN UIVIN IO RAPO CA r 0N;a"'"° r - T ,5GO* ,GATTae FAP =C01 l5rr6 OP RAPO T*AlenTTRE .6.6. MVO . .OXw a - LEGAL DESCRIPTION- EMMERT PUNTED ON A COMMIEPAD AT SUDO NO A MBE SHEET INDEX SITE ADDRE56 6t1U eve mva .. .m.vMLriae .ar Sr NM A MR SECTOR ARMEN A13LAY NM EA ANTENM PER SECTOR mo. .ins NOT mx..ie r t W ¢Y / 4 � (R AN1SNA6 TOTAU UKINIEL1 AT TI!Ter OP A PaOPRE - CO COMM OCT. pR W .406•11•auM ti MIMI � C ( 17755 N.E.48TH wsr. .51110 Pk FN. DW,a MOOS4 Arse _ O.COMM IN MA▪ ROOMDM. rz Ft mar T cmaL.e 1�1 ~ `(� ARCHITECTS Z4 u AREA,..016gCEL PARCELN11BERf5) REVSEN• MISG IPFO RENTON.WA. � WM PR u.� R KCVO.L. T 53 S.KN6 ST,SURE 106 CA-COMMERCIAL S2,143 SO.FT. 334330 1125 I.SCIORO aWiLv n.M PAM. • AT l SEATTLE NA 9DIO4 ARTERIAL DATE IF 44.4 10 r, rw.60 • Wm. .JL TEL. (206)622-3203 517E ALUISITION SHEET TITLE wrz OA FAX. (206)622-1652 •{ f� WI F{,T Q wn TACT.STEHAR7 CARDON CITY OF RENTON AREA OF LEAF �wN6 SITE PLAN 0 REVISION I ROOM NA.6ER A- GENERAL INFO IO, KEY NOTE SEC. RF ENGINEER - wrz - R -E I. PARKINS REOUREMEMS ARE LNCTIANSED Q DETAIL REFERENCE N - Z TRAFFIC 5 UNAFFECTED PRO.ELT MANAGER 3. NO SIENA6E 5 PROPt7SED art ® ED N 4. STE IS MORE THAN 100'FROM ANY `SIEET MASER ELEVATION REFERENCE RESIDENTIAL ZONE CONSTR HAWSER • N OAR ABBREVIATIONS & SYMBOLS VICINITY MAP N.T.S._ a PROJECT TEAM . PROJECT INFORMATION _ APPROVALS _ T-1 ' ROT SCALE.I'•I' • . ', ‘,': „. s , . II _—.— 26708 I I - 38i3d 9512-.2''• z_. �' \\ xl • a ER i zW 9 Sq.. 5 0 � ry w ❑,T .I N CO r V W ar *A, f1,O N_ w .' N� vt�-v -0-O-9£�-26180 — - 99,96 2,.-•— ''''.I,i— - 415 51 J b&ea l 43nV M0' - ,: =C 50 is 9 3,o rs Fli -rn -mi l= ,b �' _1111 _ 6, Q, CORPORATE 631;, LIMIT m I _ N NEWPORT HILLS. I _`"- 1.9,, r. 5,P1, 8,y=y'�'��,4.86 „,5 ,\,,, V In.. aj fin' Q r>IIITH PL. 3,5 S.E. -----. Gj ma��n e4a, a us o „ I;• rn r- _ 4 i:: is ��':::::'::::::::!:•::::::i:::•::ii:::4:>::i::::'.:::::::::i C� E • Tf `i5i5O at. 6 s l tsd b e Sri or O O iOti01 n�0140r an eO not PAO§. 0.9 .: h.o..arNer ffm!): h.. t: .i:::b a :::>ite ::be:€:: .t ed .:.;. ..;.:.,...:ring ....,. i re . . ...;t,,d..; :44i . . mineT":€:>€:€:::>€:>::::>€:>:<::><:>:>:€::> hey:wil �..h ard,.:::....m.$vvw#lt.b. C�.:le. for hey n �t the�#sere#fan of h H arirt I„xam.:t�...:..:::::::::.:::::.:...:.:::::::. PROJECT NAME: Oaksdale Campus Rezone PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-98-005,R • PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a non-project rezone of 14 acres from Medium Industrial (IM) to Arterial Commercial (CA). There is an existing, unoccupied residence and several out-buildings present on the site. The proposed rezone does not require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Future • development of the site would be for commercial uses though no specific development plans are associated with this rezone application. Location: NW corner of SW 43rd Street and Oaksdale Avenue SW, South of Spring brook Creek. PROJECT NAME: APPEAL Seelig Appeal of Western Wireless PROJECT NUMBER: AAD-97-149 (LUA-97-092,CU-A) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The appellant, Howard Seelig, appeals the issuance of a conditional use permit by the City of Renton for the Western Wireless project (File No. LUA-97-092,CU). Western Wireless proposes installation of a telecommunications monopole with a total of 12 panel antennas mounted at the top of the monopole which would have an overall height of 100 feet from the ground. Location: 1755 NE 48th Street. • AGNDA.DOC 1 NOTICE OF APPEAL HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON An Appeal Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on March 10, 1998 at 9:00 AM to consider the following petition: APPEAL OF WESTERN WIRELESS AAD-97-149 The appellant, Howard Seelig, appeals the issuance of a conditional use permit by the City of Renton for the Western Wireless project (File No. LUA-97-092,CU). Western Wireless proposes installation of a telecommunications monopole with a total of 12 panel antennas mounted at the top of the monopole which would have an overall height of 100 feet from the ground. Location: 1755 NE 48th St. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing. Publication Date: February 27, 1998 Account No. 51067 AADPUB.DOC 1 \ Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor • Fred J.Kaufman February 5, 1998 Mr. Howard Seelig Mr. Martin Seelig P.O. Box 1925 Bellevue, WA 98009 Re: Appeal of Decision re: LUA97-092,CU-A Appeal File No.: LUA97-149,AAD • Gentlemen: Your letter of appeal in the above matter has been received and a date and time for said hearing have now been established. The appeal hearing has been set for Tuesday,March 10, 1998, at 9:00 a.m.in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton. Should you be unable to attend,would you please appoint a representative to act on your behalf. This hearing has been specificially scheduled to provide the appellants sufficient time to gather the necessary materials for their appeal per their request not to schedule prior to March 6, 1998. We appreciate your cooperation,and if you have any questions,please contact this office. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner FJK:mm cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Jay Covington, Chief Adminisrative Officer Larry Warren, City Attorney Jennifer Toth Henning,.Project Manager WesternWireless 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton,Washington 98055 - (206)235-2593 • r .. 621 Company Seelig Family Properties CITY OF RENTON FEB 0 21998 _ 2 ) 19-9g- RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE �99a Itf-g I-4-Ekrii►�G— 5X iK Era FEB 2 C t-r i o F Rc.v-Cow► RC L - 91 - b9- Cu - A �=LF bti-e h���b Gclpea/ alhi-ovod `node. o Al 1-1.9- 92'. R/e hems//?ve ie /2/0 4 o o/e oloe5 //al GB 090i, lai11'11 otatopt4e4' ,/a15 an(Ad/!ties e C1t` © � kentoi-) �� q`olin�j GO C‘a-(Dh qh-d S,(a d-loighdd 7 1- t1l111q i 1, /1'e `eS,hec,114 //7 f 4CSZL 4,7` ie `ieGrlh9 no( /e Sc%edu /eel 4.04)r-e /114/- (0) i9`)' plwe //ceJ oic a✓�lla/�/� o� 6u`- /PO,b/e • .s. p6jeelz hevin., is t Ie- f�,vi 'oy- )e4SonS . eyo Dui- GDvi(i-Dl . } ,Ai2VD Lc�— Phone: 206-454-0885 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1925 Street Address: 1309 114th SE, Suite 107 Fax: 206-451-8203 Bellevue, WA Bellevue, WA 98009 98009 PUG-15-1996 16:09 98% P.08 Seelig Family Properties ` • Seelig Family Properties September 5, 1995 Jennifer Toth Henning Project Manager Dev. Serv. Div. RECEIVED • City of Renton fax: 277-4455 SEP 0 5 1997 Re: LUA-97-092CU-A DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON Dear Ms. Henning: We own the adjacent property to the east of the subject property, and we wish to file an objection to the above referenced application. Specific areas of objection are identified in the following letter. The record should show that our property is not intended to be permanently undeveloped and We request that this fact be recognized. Especially considering pending highly desirable development on the opposite side of I-405, our property has considerable potential for us as well as the City of Renton. If the adjacen owners had been less hasty they probably would be thinking of development different from warehouses this time. We have expended substantial money for architectural and engineering studies in anticipation of development of our property and recently had preconstruction conferences with Renton Officials. There are 15 separate antennas now installed, and 3 more approved with installation pending. We wish to refer to Planning Policies of Renton which recognize the unsightly nature of utilities such as the subject antennas. These Policies contain intelligent measures to accomplish a reasonable and equitable resolution for the aesthetic detriments associated with achieving a functional utility and the adverse effects on adjacent properties. From the "City of Renton Utilities Element" (attached) "The Utilities Element defines how to minimize the detrimental impacts of utility improvements on surrounding development." The policies of the Utilities Element should apply to the subject situation, and to our property as surrounding development, since our development is pending. "It(the Utilities Element) asks that the costs of improvement should be distributed in an equitable manner." Our property is already bearing at least its fair share of the cost burden because of existing antennas and their devaluing effect on our property. Adding still more unsightly antennas would go far beyond an equitable distribution of costs. The Phone Company can surely find alternative sites, although their costs may increase. But it is not equitable for us to bear the cost of devaluing our property again and again every time some phone company wants a cheap antenna site, in disregard of Renton policy. Objective U-A Phone: 206-454-0885 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1925 Street Address: 1309 114th SE, Suite 107 Fax: 206-451-8203 Bellevue, WA Bellevue, WA 98009 98009 Seelig Family Properties .\ • "Provide an adequate level of utilities consistent with land use." There are already enough antennas on the roof to meet the standard of adequacy. More are not needed to meet the standard of adequacy. • Policy U-5 • "Encourage the appropriate siting of all utility systems in a manner that reasonably minimizes impacts on adjacent land use." A few antennas here and there are "lost in the shuffle." Concentrations of antennas, such as on the subject roof; change the character of the appearance of the building. No other nearby building has a concentration of antennas like the subject warehouse at the present time, and the pending proposal would substantially add to the number of antennas. Approval for installation of more antennas as proposed would not reasonably minimize the impacts, consistent with Renton policy. Creating a building roofline profile that looks like an antenna utility station does not minimize the impact of antennas. "Discussion" (at the end of Utilities Element) "Policies are designed to insure that utility services are constructed in a manner which reasonably mitigates the impacts on adjacent land uses." This places additional emphasis on U-5 (please see preceding). Policy 101 "Require that cellular communication structures and towers be sensitively sited and designed to diminish impacts and collocated on existing towers and structures wherever possible and practical." The existing number of antennas has already changed the character of the warehouses. Conventional warehouses do not have the number of antennas that exist at this time, nor do conventional buildings nearby. More antennas would only make the warehouses look very much more strange. There is no way that making the warehouses look like antenna bases, as they do, could be consistent with the requirement for sensitive siting. Collocated antennas have not been proposed. We hereby request that the proposal to install more antennas (LUA-97-092CU-A) be denied. We will provide additional information if a hearing is scheduled. • Respectfully Submitted, HOWARD L. SEELIG MARTIN A. SEELIG • • • • < :::::::::::::::>::>:>:::<:>:><>:>:<:< ::<`>g:>:>::>:>:>::><::>:»>:::: <>:>':><: ><<: URRE T LA. N. .D9VI.5-tjN.... ..... . ........ ... ...... ........ ligiminggin ......... .................. �<�>y>AFF[Da t7 .MAILIN. ..................... On the 2titi` day of lvtu.,a.j , 1998, I deposited in the mails of the United • States, a sealed envelope containing . "G?epe t •vd tlect%l ai-% documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Slnu. ,,v& StOY0.olc. 4�ett'e.rrr� k.l I reless (Grp 14v'Le t*)h) A :3. 'toltov, HViL Real E tatc bi . tioward Seal: ZtivIC 14U1.01,1 I ICA'Crtt H•oo f • • • (Signature of Sender) St,hd44,.. I • Sr,..a..) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) SS • COUNTY OF KING ) • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Z,4 rd-2,A fir, signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the iisis and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Ta01 I/9? Not ublic i nd for the State of W gton Notary (Print) MARILYN KA CH!Err My appointment exp res: P RES 6/29/99 ' Project.N�an1e:. Wes'terin Wtwdtss act Stlu.vi3c rd Project Number: LUA •91 • 091., CU -A, EC1 NOTARY.DOC REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION DECISION DATE: January 20, 1998 Project Name: Western Wireless at Shurgard Applicant: Western Wireless Owner: Shurgard Storage (Mark A. Hall) File Number: LUA-097-092,CU-A,ECF Project Manager. Jennifer Toth Henning Project Description: Applicant proposes to install an 85-foot high telecommunications monopole mounted with a total of 12 panel antennas mounted at the top of the monopole which would achieve an overall height of 100 feet from the ground surface. Four 30-inch by 30-inch by 6-foot high equipment cabinets would be located near the monopole. A 6-foot high chain-link fence would surround the equipment compound. The project requires environmental review and an administrative conditional use permit in order to locate in the Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone. Project Location: 1755 NE 48th Street Exist. Bldg. Area SF: N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: - N/A Site Area: 400 square foot area of Total Building Area SF: N/A 2.9 acre site 121 04 i � ; 1C 50.05E 00 0 O W 4 •s 1 /.$„?.t. ;. ul 1)1 _ 3 • 1, 167 ,ce ---•-•-.� i ems! �,�; • I' ?f CG v.' 1c, �!` .rho '. m 11 " 9, I RfNTON }! y • 184 183 ir,P ;' 1' I • t JTT5J \\ ;-y9166 165 • Project Location Map • _ WWACU.DOC City of Rentbn PB/PW Department Administrative Conditional Use Permit& onmental Review Committee Staff Report • WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD L UA-97-092, CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJANUARY 20,1998 Page2 of 12 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant, Western Wireless proposes to install a Personal Communications Services facility on a commercially zoned property in the northeast portion of the city at 1755 NE 48th Street. The site is presently developed with a Shurgard self-service storage facility, consisting of five buildings, approximately 12.5 feet in height. The proposal would result in the installation of an 85-foot high antenna support structure (monopole) which would support an antenna array. The array includes 9 panel antennas which are approximately 5.5 feet long by 6-inches wide by 3-inches deep. The facility would be located on the southeast corner of the site, abutting existing Building "E". An overall height of 100 feet would result from the installation of the monopole plus antenna arrays. The existing ground height is 36 feet above sea level. The monopole would be fabricated of galvanized steel and placed on a metal grate located in the southeast corner of the Shurgard Storage lot. Four equipment cabinets, which are described as being similar in height to tall file cabinets, would also be installed. Photosimulations show a 6-foot high concrete masonry wall surrounding the equipment compound. The project application describes a 6-foot fence surrounding the leased compound area. Construction of the facility would take about two weeks to complete. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: (1) Earth Impacts: The applicant proposes to construct the monopole on the southeast corner of the Shurgard Storage site adjacent to existing Building "E". The only soil disturbance would occur when the foundation for the monopole is constructed. The site is presently covered with asphalt and no erosion is expected to result from site preparation and construction of the 400 square foot equipment compound area. However, the applicant would need to install and maintain temporary erosion control measures during the construction phase of the project, per City Code requirements. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures required. Policy Nexus: N/A (2) Air Impacts: Air quality impacts are limited to the fugitive dust during the construction phase of the project and exhaust fumes from construction equipment. Construction of this project will occur in a limited time frame, which is expected to last no more than two weeks. Fugitive dust will be controlled through compliance with the methods required by the City, WWACU.DOC City of Rentim PB/PWDepartment Administrative Conditional Use Permit&: onmental Review Committee Staff Report • WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD LUA-97-092, CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJANUARY20,1998 Page3 of 12 such as sprinkling the site and the use of erosion control measures. Exhaust from construction equipment is regulated by state and federal standards. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation measures required. Policy Nexus: N/A (3) Water Impacts: There would be no increase in the surface water runoff resulting from the project. The project will be removing an existing impervious surface material in order to construct the base of the tower and the platform for the base station equipment. However, no new impervious area is being created. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: N/A (4) Aesthetics Impacts: The proposal would introduce an additional man-made vertical element to the landscape. The proposed monopole plus antenna array would be a maximum of 100 feet above the existing ground surface. .The appearance of the monopole would be similar in appearance to existing light standards located along the public right-of-way abutting the subject parcel, but would be taller. Photosimulations provided by the applicant illustrate before and after views of the facility as modeled for several locations: from SE 76th Street looking south; from Lake Washington Boulevard SE looking east; from the southeast corner of the project site looking north; from the NE 44th Street/1-405 overpass looking northeast; from NE 48th and Lake Washington Boulevard looking east; from 111th Place SE looking west; from 1-405 near NE 50th Street (at Kiewit Construction); and, from the west side of I- 405 looking northeast. The photosimulations demonstrate that the monopole would be visible, but they do not show the facility to be obtrusive, or blocking existing views. It is clear that visual complexity of the area would increase, and that the monopole in combination with light standards and signs would add to the visual clutter of the area. This is not considered to be a significant impact though, nor, is it one that can be easily diminished or eliminated without denying the applicant's request, or decreasing the height of the pole. The City's goal is to require collocation to ultimately reduce the number of monopoles in the City. This facility would allow one or two other purveyors to collocate at this location, thus eliminating the need for an additional monopole of equal or less height. The applicant is proposing a monopole with a finish that would not produce glare. The applicant is not proposing landscaping around the equipment compound, and have stated in the application that a six-foot high security fence would surround the compound. In order to mitigate visual impacts of the equipment compound, staff recommends that the applicant be required to provide a wall, wood fence, or slatted chain-link fence to screen this portion of the site from off-site areas. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall provide screening around the equipment compound in the form of either: a wall; wood fence; or slatted chain-link fence of an appropriate height to screen the equipment cabinets from off-site areas. The applicant shall submit a drawing and written description of the design solution to meet this mitigation wWACU.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Conditional Use Permit&: onmental Review Committee Staff Report • WESTERN WIRELESSATSHURGARD LUA-97-092, CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJANUARY20,1998 Page4 of 12 measure to Development Services Division project manager, prior to the issuance of a building permit. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance (Code Section 4-6), Wireless Communications Ordinance (4689). B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from .the proposal,. staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental,Determination: DETERMINATION OF X .DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment and Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment and Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment. Appeal Period. Period followed by.a 14 day Appeal Period. C. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall provide screening around the equipment compound in the form of either: a wall; wood fence; or slatted chain-link fence of an appropriate height to screen the equipment cabinets from off-site areas. The applicant shall submit a drawing and written description .of the design solution to meet this mitigation measure to Development Services Division project manager, prior to the issuance of a building permit. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. 1. Applicant shall comply with applicable local, regional, state, and federal laws and ordinances in constructing and operating the facility. 2. Applicant shall provide a copy of the Federal Aviation Administration Notice of Proposed Construction to the City. WWACU.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDeparlment Administrative Conditional Use Permit& onmental Review Committee Staff Report WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD LUA-97-092, CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JANUARY 20,1998 Page5 of 12 This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action x Conditional Use--Administrative Binding Site Plan Site Plan Review .Shoreline Substantial.Development Permit Special Permit for Grade &Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. T-1, Site Plan (Received July 3, 1997). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. A-1, Project Plan, (Received July 3, 1997). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. A-2, Exterior Elevations, (Received July 3, 1997) Exhibit No. 5: :Photosimulations (Received July 21,.1997, September 5, 1997, and September 15, 1997). C. Project Description/Background: The applicant, Western Wireless is proposing to install a wireless communications facility consisting of an 85- foot high monopole, with 12 antennas (each an additional height of 15 feet), and four equipment cabinets (approximately the size of tall file cabinets). The facility would occupy a 400 square foot area of the existing Shurgard Storage commercial business at 1755 NE 48th Street in the north portion of the City. This area is generally referred to as the "Exit 7" since the 1-405 Exit No. 7 on and off-ramps are located just south of the site. Several wireless communications purveyors have been permitted to install facilities on the roof of the Shurgard buildings in recent years. This application differs in that it is the first with a monopole structure. The overall height of the facility would be 100 feet, and the monopole would be visible from off-site areas. The existing ground elevation is 36 feet above sea level. The applicant has stated that the height of the monopole was determined in order to meet engineering requirements and to provide an opportunity for other purveyors to collocate,while allowing adequate separation of facilities. The site is zoned CA (Commercial Arterial). This facility is considered to be a Monopole II facility based on definitions in the City's recently adopted Wireless Communications Ordinance. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now makes and enters the following: D. Findings 1) CONSISTENCY WITH CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA Section 4-31-14 lists 10 factors that the governing authority shall consider in determining whether to issue a conditional use permit (although the governing authority may waive or reduce the burden on the applicant of WWACU.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department I Administrative Conditional Use Permit& onmental Review Committee Staff Report WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD LUA-97 092, CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JANUARY 20,1998 Page6 of 12 one or more of these criteria if the governing authority, concludes that the goals of this ordinance are better served thereby). The 10 factors are as follows:. 1. HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED TOWER Structures in the Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone are allowed to be a maximum height of 50 feet. The Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance (4689) permits Monopole II facilities to achieve a height of up to 150 feet, depending on restrictions of the applicable zone. Ordinance 4689 also allows Monopole II structures to exceed the height of the underlying zoning designation by 35 feet, plus an additional 15 feet for antennas which extend above the Monopole II structure. Antennas which extend above the monopole II wireless communications support structure shall not be calculated as part of the height of the wireless communications support_structure (Section 4-38-11:H.). For monopoles in the CA Zone, a maximum monopole height of 85 feet plus an.additional 15 feet for antennas would be allowed. In other words, a maximum of 100 feet of overall equipment height would be permissible (50 feet zone height+ an additional 35 feet on monopole+ an.additional 15 feet for antennas). The proposal for.an 85-foot monopole in the CA Zone, with an additional 15 feet of antennas for an overall height of 100 feet above ground level complies with the Wireless Communications Ordinance. No variance or conditional use permit for excess height is required. 2. PROXIMITY OF THE TOWER TO RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES AND RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT BOUNDARIES The applicant states that the proposal is located in a commercial area, is a commercial enterprise, and is intended to avoid impacts to residential neighborhoods. The facility would be located adjacent to an existing storage building, and is approximately 330+ feet from the nearest residential use, which is within.the City.of Newcastle's boundaries. Ordinance 4689 prohibits Monopole II structures within 300 feet of residential zones including the Resource Conservation (RC), Residential-1 DU/AC (R-1), Residential-5 DU/AC (R-5), Residential-8 DU/AC (R-8), Residential-10 DU/AC (R-10) or Residential- 14 DU/AC (R-14) Zone. Staff concurs that the proposed use is generally compatible with the commercial area, and meets or exceeds locational criteria in relation to residential neighborhoods. 3. NATURE OF USES ON ADJACENT AND NEARBY PROPERTIES The subject site is developed with a self-service storage facility. Five structures, parking, and landscaped areas occupy the site. In addition, roof-mounted wireless communications equipment (omni and panel antennas)for other telecommunications purveyors have been installed on the roof of existing Building C. The proposal would result in the installation of a monopole and surface mounted equipment on the south side of existing Building E. This is adjacent to and east of Building C, and the wireless communications facility would be installed in the southeast corner of the site. The project site is located near the City's common boundary with the City of Newcastle. An undeveloped parcel, also zoned for commercial use, abuts the subject site on the east. Hemmingson Terrace, a single family residential development within Newcastle is located east of the undeveloped site, approximately 330 feet from the subject site. Other commercial uses to the west and south include shops/services, restaurant and motel. Multi-family residential housing has developed on parcels to the north of the site, and 1-405 is located to the west. The proposal would occur on a portion of the site that is impervious surface. The equipment compound would be a 20-foot by 20-foot leased area. This 400 square foot compound area would not measurably increase lot coverage of the 126,000 square foot site. Permitted lot coverage in the CA Zone is 65%, and the proposal would be far less than this. The proposed location is part of a commercial area with zoning that permits primarily retail and service uses. Wireless base stations are defined as medium utilities, which are permitted in the CA Zone with an Administrative Conditional Use Permit. Existing wireless communications purveyors are located on the subject parcel, but as roof-mounted equipment. The site appears to be suitable for the proposed use. 4. SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY Landform in the area slopes up from west to east. Development has occurred on sites that have been graded to create level areas. The adjacent vacant site to the east,is higher than the subject parcel and has deciduous tree cover. The hillside is vegetated with both deciduous and coniferous trees that WWACU.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Conditional Use Permit& onmental Review Committee Staff Report WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD LUA-97-092, CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJANUARY20,1998 Page7 of 12 screen views to and from the residential neighborhood upslope from the project site. Views to the west generally include Lake Washington. 5, SURROUNDING TREE COVERAGE AND FOLIAGE Both deciduous and coniferous tree cover is present on the adjacent and abutting parcels to the east. Views from the site upslope to the east are of dense tree cover. The Hemmingson Terrace subdivision has views to Lake Washington to the west through the tree cover. During the winter months,when the trees have less foliage, visibility to the west increases. 6: . :DESIGN:OF.THE TOWER, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE.TO DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS . THAT HAVE.THE EFFECT OF REDUCING OR ELIMINATING.VISUAL OBTRUSIVENESS The.85-foot.monopole and attached 15-foot high panel antennas would have an overall height of 100 feet. The proposed monopole would be visible from on-.:and off-site locations. Photosimulations have been provided .which show before and after..views.of..the proposed facilities from several vantage points. The monopole would be located on the southeastern corner of the property, backing up to the existing wooded slope. The existing tree cover would provide some absorption of the lower portion of the facility when viewed from off-site areas to the west. The undeveloped parcel to the east is approximately 330 feet wide (west/east dimension) and 660 feet long (north/south dimension). The proposed monopole would be located adjacent to_the center portion of that site's frontage, and would be visible in the foreground view for this site. That site is also zoned Commercial Arterial, and could be developed with a.retail commercial or service use. No development proposal has been filed for this parcel. No-alternate..locations.on the subject property are proposed for the monopole. Any movement of the monopole to the north or further west would not measurably diminish the view of the facility. The monopole would remain in the foreground view area for parcels to the east. The monopole would be galvanized steel, and would not be reflective in nature. It is also possible to paint the monopole in an attempt to diminish view impacts. The applicant has not provided a landscaping plan as part of the proposal. The compound location is currently partially screened by an existing building and a low wall is shown on the photosimulations to screen the compound. The monopole would be installed in an area that is currently asphalt, and the applicant has submitted a letter stating that they would like to provide landscaping in conformance with Renton's Telecommunications Ordinance. Staff will recommend that the approval of the conditional use permit be conditioned upon the provision of acceptable screening around the base of the equipment compound. Acceptable screening includes a wall, chain-link fencing with slats, wood fencing, or landscaping as prescribed in the Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance. 7. PROPOSED INGRESS AND EGRESS Access to the proposed facility would be from NE 48th Street. Access would be needed during construction and any necessary or scheduled maintenance. The proposed facility would not displace parking or require additional parking. Maintenance of the facility would require a visit to the site approximately once each month, and existing parking would be utilized to accomplish the maintenance. The occasional service vehicle should not require the addition of any additional on-site parking. 8, POTENTIAL NOISE, LIGHT AND GLARE IMPACTS. The monopole, antennas and equipment cabinet are not expected to generate noise, light or glare. The facility would have a small fan which would generate negligible noise. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) will need to be consulted to determine whether or not lighting or marking of the proposed 85-foot high monopole (plus 15 foot high antennas-- resulting in a 100-foot high monopole) is needed. If lighting is required, glare could occur. Glare from the monopole itself is not expected to result, as it would be painted with a non-glare finish. WWACU.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department ' Administrative Conditional Use Permit&, onmental Review Committee Staff Report WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD _ LUA-97-092, CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JANUARY 20,1998 Page8 of 12 9. AVAILABILITY OF SUITABLE EXISTING TOWERS AND OTHER STRUCTURES There are presently several wireless communications facilities located on the roof of the existing Shurgard Storage commercial business. However, these are all roof-mounted facilities, and do not provide the area of coverage sought by the applicant. The Wireless Communications Facilities : .Ordinance'encourages collocation of facilities, and an 85-foot high,;monopole would allow collocation of one-or two additional carriers,based on service area and equipment separation requirements. The ,applicant maintains that the customer demand for wireless communications . facilities : demonstrates the need at this location. They also state that the proposal would be different than the . other..purveyors. that-.have roof-mounted equipment. This site . does have . other . wireless communications facilities (6 omni .antennas and.6.panel-.antennas),-.-however''none of these are monopole structures and would not meet the applicant's engineering needs. .The:design of this facility would enable one. or more additional purveyors to collocate. without .necessity of constructing additional monopole sites in the immediate vicinity. 10. COMPATIBILITY WITH THE GENERAL PURPOSE, GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND STANDARDS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ANY OF THE PLAN, PROGRAM, MAP OR ORDINANCE OF THE CITY. (A) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS AND,POLICIES The proposed telecommunications facility is consistent with the,following Comprehensive Plan policies: Policy.U-1 Utility facilities and .services..should..be consistent with the growth and ......::development.concepts.directed by the Comprehensive Plan. The City of:Renton's.business, industrial, and .residential development is-growing. The expansion of.the-Personal.Communication System within the City is to ensure that a high quality of service can be offered to the local and regional community. Policy U-5: Encourage the appropriate siting, construction, operation, and decommissioning of all utility systems in a manner that reasonably minimizes impacts on adjacent land uses. The applicant has stated that the proposed facility has been located and designed to minimize aesthetic impacts of the community while providing a valuable communication service. The design of an 85-foot high monopole with antennas would allow for the collocation of one or two additional carriers, thus reducing the total number of monopoles that would likely occur in the vicinity over time. The nearest residential dwellings are at least 330 feet from the proposed structure. Letters have been received from adjacent property owners who are concerned with the aesthetic impacts of wireless telecommunications structures. Relocation of the tower further from the residences would not decrease visibility. While the tower might appear to be less tall from the residences, it would still be visible in the foreground view. Policy U-100: Require that the siting and location of telecommunications facilities be accomplished in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on the environment and adjacent land uses. The monopole has been proposed for location on an existing developed commercial property in the Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone. No environmentally sensitive areas would be disturbed to construct or operate the facility. The 85-foot monopole height with 15 additional feet for antennas was determined to satisfy engineering requirements of the applicant and to provide an opportunity for one or two additional purveyors to collocate on the monopole, consistent with the City's Wireless Communications Ordinance. Photosimulations provided by the applicant show the monopole location from several vantage points: from NE 48th Street/SE 76th Street looking south, from Lake Washington Boulevard NE looking east, from just off-site looking to the southeast corner of the site. The Environmental Review Committee also requested additional photosimulations to be provided from 111th Place SE looking west, from 112th Avenue SE looking southwest, from 1-405 near the northern city WWACU.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Conditional Use Permit& ;onmental Review Committee Staff Report WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD ' LUA-97-092, CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JANUARY 20,1998 Page9 of 12 limits looking south, and from Ripley Lane looking east. The applicant has provided the additional view angles. The photosimulations provided do not raise concern regarding the aesthetic impact of the facility as seen from these areas. Residential areas to the east would have partially screened views of the lower portion of the facility due to the existing tree cover. Policy U-101: Require that cellular communication structures and towers be sensitively sited and designed to diminish aesthetic impacts, and be collocated..on existing structures and towers wherever possible and practical. The applicant states that the specific location was selected as, it is far removed from residences, and none of the surrounding land uses would'be detrimentally affected by the operation of an antenna array at this site. Further, the applicant_maintains that the existing impacts of the commercial mini-storage use would not:have.any.further.effect on neighboring properties beyond what they are already experiencing. .The.'applicant affirms that the principal effect on neighboring properties would.be visual. And that the impact would be _minimized.to the extent possible through the selection:of,anonopole.versus a lattice tower. In addition, the applicant contends that the area selected for the project is as far from the surrounding residential land uses as possible. Staff differs with the applicant on the justification provided with regard to diminished visual impacts. While the monopole would be sited a minimum of 330 feet from adjacent residential land uses, the aesthetic or visual effects would be greater than the visual impacts of the .existing commercial use. The height of the monopole would make.it;visible from surrounding on-site and off-site areas. If the Federal Aviation Administration requires marking or lighting of the monopole the visibility of the structure would increase. Staff has received two letters from surrounding property owners which state concerns regarding the aesthetic impacts of the proposal. The..proposal would allow the collocation of an additional one or two purveyors on the monopole,.which would meet the intent of the Comprehensive Plan policies for collocation. (B) ZONING CODE The project site is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA). The CA Zone allows for the construction of medium utilities (wireless base stations) providing that an administrative conditional use permit is approved. However, the recently adopted Ordinance 4689 - Wireless Communications Facilities allows this type of structure -- a Monopole II facility -- in the CA with an Administrative Conditional Use Permit. The CA Zone limits the heights of structures to a maximum of 50 feet. Heights may exceed that maximum height with a Conditional Use Permit. As proposed, the project exceeds the 50-foot height limit of the CA Zone. Ordinance 4689 regulating Wireless Communications Facilities permits Monopole II structures (freestanding structures less than 150 feet in height) in the CA Zone subject to an Administrative Conditional Use Permit. The permitted height for a Monopole II structure shall be 35 feet higher than the regular permitted maximum height for the applicable zoning district, or 150 feet, whichever is less. Given this criteria, the height of the monopole at this site would be limited to 85 feet, as proposed. In addition, Ordinance 4689 allows antennas to extend 15 feet above the support structure. As proposed, the 100- foot tall structure (85 foot high monopole with 15 foot antennas) would meet the requirements of Ord. 4689 in concert with the requirements of the CA Zone. The CA Zone requires additional setbacks and landscaping for lots abutting residentially zoned parcels. These requirements would not apply to the proposal, as the subject site is not located adjacent to residentially zoned parcels. The closest residentially zoned parcels are at least 330 feet from the subject site. (C) ORDINANCE 4689--WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES The proposal is regulated by the recently adopted Wireless Communication Facilities Ordinance. Monopole facilities of greater than 60 feet but less than 150 feet in height are considered to be Monopole II facilities. The proposed structure would is permitted in the CA Zone, subject to an Administrative Conditional Use Permit, provided it is set back a minimum wWACU.DOC •City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Conditional Use Permit& onmental Review Committee Staff Report WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD LUA-97-092, CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JANUARY 20,1998 Pagel of 12 of 300 feet from any adjacent residentially zoned parcel. The monopole would be located at least 330 feet from the closest residentially zoned parcel. 2) REQUEST: The Applicant, Western Wireless, has requested approval for Administrative Conditional Use Permit for a proposed Personal Communication Services(PCS) facility at 1755 NE 48th Street. The proposal includes the installation of an 85-foot high monopole with an 12 antennas resulting in an additional 15 feet of height, for an overall height of 100 feet. Four radio equipment cabinets are also proposed. 3) ADMINISTRATIVE CONDITIONAL USE: The applicant's administrative conditional use application generally complies with the submittal requirements for a Conditional Use,Permit. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 1 through 5. 4) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area- Commercial (EAC). 5) ZONING: -The proposal complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the CA (Commercial Arterial)Zone. 6) WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE: The proposal as presented, generally complies with the requirements and standards of the Wireless Communications Ordinance with the following exceptions: 1) no landscaping or screening has been proposed surrounding the'.equipment compound. Ordinance 4689 states that Monopole II facilities shall be landscaped in conformance with City Code Section 4-31-34, Landscaping. A minimum landscaping area of 15 feet is required surrounding the facility. Landscaping is to include:trees, shrubs, and.groundcover. However, Ordinance 4689 states that the Administrator or his/her designee may permit alternates and modifications, providing that the proposed design and/or methodology is satisfactory and complies with the provisions of this Chapter and that the materials, method or work offered is, for the purpose'intended, at least the equivalent of that prescribed in this Chapter in suitability, strength, effectiveness, durability, safety, maintainability and environmental protection. Staff will recommend that the applicant provide landscaping to meet the intent of Ordinance 4689, or, a suitable alternative form of screening such as a wall or fence. 7) EXISTING LAND USE: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: multi-family residential and commercial; East: vacant (CA Zoned) and single family residential (Newcastle zoning); South: commercial; and West: Interstate 405. E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal generally complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. • 2) Specific Land Use (e.g. Administrative Conditional Use Permit) issues were raised by various City departments as follows: a) Airport Manager commented that the proposal requires that a Notice of Proposed Construction must be submitted to and approved by the FAA. The base elevation of the facility is 36 feet. The overall height of the monopole, antennas, and base elevation equals 136 feet. 3) The proposal generally complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Commercial and the Zoning designation of Commercial Arterial. The facility is not considered to be redevelopment of the entire site and would not trigger the landscape frontage requirement of and by itself. 4) The proposal generally complies with the Ordinance 4689 regulating Wireless Communications Facilities. The applicant will need to provide an appropriate measure of screening around the equipment compound -- either with landscaping, a wall, or fencing; or a combination thereof. WWACU.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Conditional Use Permit&. onmental Review Committee Staff Report WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD L UA-97-092, CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JANUARY 20,1998 Page11 of 12 F. Decision The Administrative Conditional Use Permit for Western Wireless at Shurgard at 1755 NE 48th Street, File No. LUA-97-092,ACU, ECF is approved subject to the following conditions. 1. The,applicant shall submit either 1) a landscape plan to the City's Development Services Division which provides for the installation of a dense screen of ornamental vegetation on the perimeter of the equipment compound; OR, 2) a detail of the proposed fence design or wall design that demonstrates how the.wall/fence would screen the equipment compound from off-site areas. SIGNATURE: ames C.Hanson,Zoning Administrator approval date TRANSMITTED this 20th day of January, 1998 to the applicant and owner: Shurgard Storage 1755 NE 48th Street Renton, WA 98056 Western Wireless attn: Greg Anderson 330,120th Avenue NE, Suite 110 Bellevue, WA 98005 TRANSMITTED this 20th day of January, 1998 to the parties of record: N.J. Totton HAL Real Estate Investments 2125 Western Avenue, Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98121 Howard Seelig PO Box 1925 Bellevue, WA 98009 June Huson Katrina Hoof 11030 SE 76th Street Newcastle, WA 98056-1607 TRANSMITTED this 20th day of January 1998 to the following: Larry Meckling-Building Official„ Neil Watts-Public Works Division, Art Larson-Fire Marshal, Lawrence J.Warren-City Attorney, South County Journal Environmental Determination(DNS-M): The 15 day comment and appeal period for the environmental determination for this project ended on Monday, October 6, 1997. Written comments were forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. WWACU.DOC City of Renion PB/PWDepartment Administrative Conditional Use Permit&. onmental Review Committee Staff Report WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD L UA-97-092, CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JANUARY 20,1998 Page12 of 12 Land Use Action Appeals APPEAL: This administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM, Monday February 2, 1998. Appeals to the Hearing Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 235-2501. Appeals must be filed in writing, together with the required $75.00 application fee, to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill.Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. • • WWACU.DOC • .. .. . • T.1 Mem 3313301125 ,,... A A A ,1,:. FARCE.. 1 ? .5:11.1 t ' WESTERN WIRELESS ____ ..,.---,-/----.,---,a=--,...--.-..-.......---.- .- -.7,.--.,L,, .. ___, ._ • 330 120th AVENUE NE..00 3F-ATTLE,WASHINGTON NOON •i&-..-n•.- I e. ', / n i • P. ',i PHONE SOW 451-12.50 EX156115 MDR<61. .151610 E.....6. le•-/. A., 1 1-• ,i 2..,'. AC 1 . -..* , ...,. 1.''t. ' • ''- '' ern FAX SOS th1-7387 • J . '7.• _ . STREET • 9 4 A , ... .1,,..\;;. 4,r'',.1 ir rilh' eS " oF6 11 fRO.E.1.gx.Anari A ,. • A 4,- ... ‘,.JAE. 2G1.516.5.1 1.' • i 1. !..4•'.\ /...J.., . (Th .•\. 1 . A .,,,, ..-. .., w 0.1.11 DOM.5. / .... ,•••‘,... i 7 .,..:,:,,,, ; -1:k 21-11.41 RE4751,0 I.C....5.1.,E.,;',IL'Ll '' ..`..,:t ife'.1.d == 11.1.1,11 REVIS50 MM.SS,' . • ,. ] 13/rm., li .. . `. I W , i›.6.11146 P.F-L • . 1 .00.151.4 1•01AL ', A 6' 0 6. , ° <> 1:Z. SITE NAME: 6 1111.11 ROOF LFPER ROCF 0 .1 i 11.1111.6 ' 1 14 f• < ,1•\ 01T/R7 RM.,1F.A6 EXTENDED MERCER SOUTH <RH.<el TOTAL & SHURGARD STORAGE A. • I x ,,:. --, -,':R .9. . I.1, uesrus DAV.IR 'II ‘. SITE NUMBER A. !..i -,- ..: , SE3-411-A ,th, . • .i _,J 1 ,J i -\,,,\ •, EMIR<BVILCF.... ; i' • • f .I444:i3E44:4, ,4,1•4,4,( 'I X 1 I .._ I • II ,----- • • 1. . •f. -- - _. L . . 1.516 PI-.6 A• - ilt.REPRESIORA1.1 PRO,f1R1T toe :3 OR,DO.0,*ALE VERIFY NI.0.915.6 ZED ( ".:?• 2.1:41,T ALL FROF.TY L.0...1.1 OM SITE PLAN ° ° '---__.=-- SCALE. I.•3Cf ' ' '..• -:. -...• •••••.., .• -. . 1,106.1.OP Pt OFINER.If, . . . 13-161,1131.1.1.0.11/110, . REPP....60i OR IF;OP 11.1,,i II me Irr-C.0.11a.CRITAD.E0 IN Il ISSEEL.12=EZE21. WTP HAW, %IF NHPFP ,P,A,gm - clucaumah ANN.••••••••*1111, ••• CR LOT 2 CD.WIRT YOU FL<11.501,11.1600416,1 UNDER, RECORD°. ...,......0... 5,,.....A .... ,,....r...,,Z:,....',,..,Z yap,o...to 9 son 118-EFR D60.25056 SkI0•1:Ri R.MO.A 613,051011 OP TRAGI 411.2 i-1 Slif FUR CORRAL WORK.. • •••••• ..'''''''''........ ..F. ..r.-...- F.L. .„, JT5 LI.11.1411.011.1001 O.f CPI POMPON TO.VNTTLE CE.15....5 AGG.GROR45 TO TRE,L.66,60,..C7101E0 DI YOLIK 0 gTE An'AW-4ft GUM I sae Port I LA .....''....,...".= ''''' 7..'7:re=""ts:,_ Ea..Are • 0,RAM PA.01,RD<LON,A, Fru,pre 401/1 TOEIS.ER 1.4111 NI P.I.59TEXT FOR FF5III:55. 5036ERRE RENT vrairo,p. ON.1.0,16055 YV.A.62 116661110.1.PARTE. 001 IR.AVG Y.112 ROW MENDE)MERCER SOUTH :,...7, ...B.F._ I5E SONERIGT?I FEET....5 14....vster.AGNS THE 1.457 L.01 1.01.l urr OP RE•rnaiLLA.3-82.111606601.1.2..le"WY A1000. 6FPLICANT2 .A1•116 P.fa. ,... SHURGARD STORAGE tt mr, - Al EL RON 51. FILL•.01.11006 M.w rcw.0,.1.47 115.CD.RILLENA5 LACE ROOF PLAN if'pf re..-.7...'..'. F.t..,..L..1..=.... 51'EN 51. wr...109.45 To PE PNT INFREGIF PEUTE5E2 q VOUE,OF 11,16, AO<OR NENE NE..110 A-2 ERTPREE ELEVATIONS I RAE NNE PANE Pi.REGORDS or co.MN,AA- 5F_ATTLE.E.5.1..5TOR V.003 1.Tt INVER . :7,1. '''''''''''......= Fir =F•F.,,, •'' 11 re.''.•'.. 1 TEL.DON Al5IND CONTACT.PAM TNuTe ERN rr.Z....... '.::".‘ ."."2:er' •"' pnr........ PRO PET Or-Wthrilf/11. SE3-411-A A 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTIONLc, L........... T11E5 EP AAI.N TWAENEG A51ITGICTROER PAANMIMIRA"WAMEINA.KM P13.1P NIapoT.EG IPR n55,104 SHEET INDEX I PI Pan50.5 TOTAll...01512.51 TM MIDI A liNDF0.2 - Nr = I .6 leo, . • i 17155 NE.4.592 1 Iral g'. A c" , SR= PB AR.F.15 ISM:a NMI.OP PAR,I pnam Metr.RfSh pOCAYANT REVIEW • RENTON.NA-11/3056 • (...n.,ve , (il‘ P•11 ..IWO NORMAL ellly •=ranawma Fi. .--A,.. ,... : ''' 7 ...ME.NE. .N. • 'F'AR r."';it= SEP NANITIOM I.REET IIIIE ---i '6 1. IRSOPTION FRO..E.ET AREA ...LOMIALf•STEK.1,-.1.611 CM OF Ptrrt1,4 N.Or IMAM N A SITE PLAN remum = ROC.4 KI-BER ' F. • GENERAL INFO 4 REFERBILE tErEIEBALIRE23276012A . ANNE.ITGENSH-1.75.... ........seo • Fr£E.T.A N. - oETAIL REFERENCE 1-1-N" 2 MANIC 15.F.E.IEGIED FlEvAIIN REFERENCE WE I5.PORE TAN 100'FRG., VICINITY MAP bIIID • /US PROJECT TEAM 5 140 WAN.5 PruaRMED AN ETTRAVEMPAR.MC PROJECT INFORMATION PRo-EGT KNEE, WEIR IIIANGETI APPROVALS - ABBREVIATIONS & SYMBOLS - 1 YE£11.1BER T-1 - , - ...- - - • -. . . I AAAw s • WESTERN WIRELESS , eo5ne Pelee 330120th AVENUE NE.01f0 SEATT E WASHINGTON 60006 X X X— _ X X _ _X — — FAY SOO x =X_ _ X X X X96FTl60 ; — _ — FAY (20B)46LT961 y na. mriee MR em� y ., t �r CONCRETE PAD X [ULm IC/ee0 rgae MT s l I • `,, i A M I. Q >., NO stne A�. DAWNS E q 4 , xn}; men A�. is r a. i. • NAN.,CIlReE. > . y \ `/• e • Y>X. % .vNaaE,K rew r+v rwi nai Cls ••cm v a> same !dr � I o-� 1,... x�t eo N . >. . x > ones PROPER,OF ne.arm,IT.PRLAJLED n IU.We I r. h EX ENDO Libm. .CO>M x•N SHURGARD STORAGE > >,. > 8E3-01-A I >, >- 1 n°,„„ i >' mss N.E.40TH X>' RENTON,WA.580L6 >' RISC.INFO > ( IW.ET ma I > I PROJECT PLAN • x> WILDINSL > Z I wet iu¢n PLAN IS A cm,,co WI MALL rE. VIMMeteNTKIGioW � I >' A-1 PROJECT PLAN :u SCALE. w.ra I I ,.� . : �v® 0 sterrn A A e WESTERN WIRELESS 33012010 AVENUE NE.♦n0 f•f SEATTLE.WASHINGT011 0000E PHONE (200)46L12W 4 FM- (206)0E1.7J97 • / GRAOSEO w<co-urtENA'maim / hvaro•Fn wino-.,...Eruitt "dy' ' x. k ' n4 r I . • i " mad om11M11111111ME A »vn T.�2 e: .r..unE A�. aMEM• '; i ,• • PLChIREC19 ��� LATHE attn IT b 1 T oa.a/T,=xs E+OAn _11.41 N>,e wr17:1E 3 I YR' -------7 . any: =k En �T��� ,s i:i•:.:: I•` SEa-T1-A IT55 NE.48T11 RENTOtl Plh 00036 - • 1 MISC.IWO OUT nnE EXT.ELEVATIONS i i A-2 WEST ELEVATION t.2,T SCALE. IE)••ra I 50UTH ELEVATION " ' ' - zr- scN.E. Vb..ro' 2 fa 1 '^ CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: January 16, 1998 TO: Jim Hanson,Mike Kattennann FROM: Jennifer Toth Henning SUBJECT: Western Wireless at Shurguard`(LUA- 790 092-U A;ECF)=' , The above-referenced file was granted an administrative conditional use permit on September 18, 1997. The CUP was appealed, and an appeal hearing was held before the Hearing Examiner on December 2, 1997. The Examiner remanded the matter back to the Zoning Administrators to review the proposal under the appropriate Conditional Use Permit criteria referenced in the City's Wireless Communications Ordinance,rather than the standard general Conditional Use Permit criteria. The report has been revised. Please review and sign the decision if you concur with the Staff recommendation. The environmental determination remains unchanged. Thank you. cc: \\TS_SERVER\SYS2:\COMMON\-H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.INGUTH\WWSHURG.DOC\jth DEVELOPMENT PLANNING 1 ' CITY OF RENTON western® JA 02 ggD wireless RECEVED December 31, 1997 Ms. Jennifer Henning City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue, 3rd Floor Renton, WA 98055 Re: Western Wireless Proposal at Mercer South Shurgard (LUA 97-092) Dear Ms. Henning: Please accept this letter as formal notification that there is a change in the applicant contact for this application. I will no longer be working in the Seattle Western Wireless office. For further information, please contact Greg Anderson at 425-586-8984 or 425-864-0563. The office address of 3650 131St Avenue SE, #400, Bellevue, WA 98006, remains unchanged. For your convenience, I have enclosed Greg's business card. Thank you for your continued efforts on this proposal. Sincerely, ---- — WESTERN WIRELESS western® 1 I 1 wireless Gregory S.Anderson 3650131''Avenue S.E.,#400 Project Manager Bellevue,WA 98006 Katie Johnson Office (425)586-8984 Fax (425)586-8811 Cellular(206)864-0563 E-mail:gsa@ricochet.net Pager(888)802-4280 Western Wireless Corporation 3650 131 st Avenue SE,#400 Bellevue,WA 98006 (425) 586-8700 FAX(425) 586-8666 • WWashington State - Northwest Region AO •Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North Sid Morrison P.O. Box 330310 Seattle,WA 98133-9710 Secretary of Transportation (206)440-4000 • • DEVELOPMENT PLANNING G!TY f:PIz 'TnN DATE: October 3, 1997 OCT 1 3 1997 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning C a�� f City of Renton, Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South Renton WA 98055 Subject: SR 405 MP 7.20 CS 1744 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance-Western wireless At Shurgard- Instillation 85 foot telecommunications monopole & 12 Panel antennas File No.LUA-97-092,CU-A,ECF t � FROM: Robert A. Josephson, PE, Manager of Planning &Local Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region • 15700 Dayton Avenue North, MS 122 • P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 • Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project, which is located 1755 NE 48th Street. Our response is below: We have reviewed this subject document and have no comments. The Project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. If you have any questions, please contact Don Hurter at 440-4664 or Vickie Erickson at • 440-4915 of my Developer Services section • VEE:vee File Name ......... ... .. .......... . ..... .. . ...... .. ...... . ... ................. .:::. .. .:..::... U RE LA • • 8 :, AI ::IN;::.:ogim'>'>>€>`> > '»>>i>' ` »>>»>i>>i<>'>`'> >> >»>OF $ER�ICE Y.MA L!N ................................ On the 1.111 day of e w er , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United • States, a sealed envelope containing • Re Y� ay-v:1 RectSlaVe is documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing • S1nu.vga.v-d Sto vie. �.le s�ev-h W trelesS (SavvnavAhu.. klau3) rk Vt M 1 ( W2ta\ev-v1 WlYet as} 11 .3 . To lkbvn N aL, Ree►1a-k 1lawcLrd Seelt. • Ju v e 1-4us.v1' -1 'd o • • (Signature of Sender) i .,&saw k- a • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) SS • COUNTY OF KING ) • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 111 DRi¢ 6 L 7 - signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and ;purposes mentioned in the instrument. • Dated: 7///19 7 �� c���� ti 4 6.7V. .�� Notary Public' and for y) State of Washiiii fon�l-� (J Notary (Prin ��(�Gp►RET J.': � R My appointment expires: !9198 Project Name: 4 +e V1wre\ess S1Au. .kt_ Project Number: LUN- -09Z, GU-fi E( NOTARY.DOC 'i '. - �- '. ` REPORT City of Renton & Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION DECISION DATE: September 16; 1997 Project Name: Western Wireless at Shurgard Applicant: Western Wireless Owner. Shurgard Storage . (Mark A. Hall) File Number. LUA-097-092,CU-A,ECF Project Manager. Jennifer Toth Henning Project Description: Applicant proposes to install an 85-foot high telecommunications monopole mounted with a total of 12 panel antennas mounted at the top of the monopole which would achieve an overall height of 100 feet from the ground surface. Four 30-inch by 30-inch by 6-foot high equipment cabinets would be located near the monople. A 6-foot high chain-link fence would surround the equipment compound. The project requires environmental review and an administrative conditional use permit in order to locate in the Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone. Project Location: 1755 NE 48th Street Exist. Bldg. Area SF: N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: N/A ' Site Area: 400 square foot area of Total Building Area SF: 2.9 acre s ite \,' - -Qyr` �// --�^--- ro ii-.-CORPORATE � I �2v~o ay, 10 e a II a fi f ,� P U ' � • ----fig------- [[ 6': (31 _ i F C 9 P Ip2092 1,, oHEM 0 __9 ge n1 1!: Sc ae, 0 j y LI El SP 099069 It!! .49 u• 9 . !I R_ENJON 4'1_ _ N %„ 184 1839 oe ' . t! ' ° - � �� �.��y�166 1 165 Project Location Map "' -- ACUERC.DOC , 12) r '+V I 9P,a,-97 - 'C; ' are r ',�J(c; "-9 "InGeode ' `City;of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Conditional Use Permit& ronmental Review Committee Staff Report WESTERN WIRELSSAT SHURGARD LUA-97-092„CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 16,1997 Page2 of12 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant, Western Wireless proposes to install a Personal Communications Services facility on a commercially zoned property in the northeast portion of the city at 1755 NE 48th Street. The site is presently developed with a Shurgard self-service storage facility, consisting of five buildings, approximately 12.5 feet in height. The proposal would result in the installation of an 85-foot high antenna support structure (monopole) which would support an antenna array. The array includes 9 panel antennas which are approximately 5.5 feet long by 6-inches wide by 3-inches deep. The facility would be located on the southeast corner of the site, abutting existing Building "E". An overall height of 100 feet would result from the installation of the monopole plus antenna arrays. The existing ground height is 36 feet above sea level. The monopole would be fabricated of galvanized steel and placed on a metal grate located in the southeast corner of the Shurgard Storage lot. Four equipment cabinets, which are described as being similar in height to tall file cabinets, would also be installed. Photosimulations show a 6-foot high concrete masonry wall surrounding the equipment compound. The project application describes a 6-foot fence surrounding the leased compound area. Construction of the facility would take about two weeks to complete. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: (1) Earth Impacts: The applicant proposes to construct the monopole on the southeast corner of the Shurgard Storage site adjacent to existing Building "E". The only soil disturbance would occur when the foundation for the monopole is constructed. The site is presently covered with asphalt and no erosion is expected to result from site preparation and construction of the 400 square foot equipment compound area. However, the applicant would need to install and maintain temporary erosion control measures during the construction phase of the project, per City Code requirements. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures required. Policy Nexus: N/A (2) Air Impacts: Air quality impacts are limited to the fugitive dust during the construction phase of the project and exhaust fumes from construction equipment. Construction of this project will occur in a limited time frame, which is expected to last no more than two weeks. Fugitive dust will be controlled through compliance with the methods required by the City, ACUERC.DOC 'City:of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Conditional Use Permit& ronmental Review Committee Staff Report , WESTERN WIRELSSAT SHURGARD - LUA-97-092„CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFSEPTEMBER 16,1997 Page3 of 12 such as sprinkling the site and the use of erosion control measures. Exhaust from construction equipment is regulated by state and federal standards. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation measures required. Policy Nexus: N/A (3) Water Impacts: There would be no increase in the surface water runoff resulting from the project. The project will be removing an existing impervious surface material in order to construct the base of the tower and the platform for the base station equipment. However, no new impervious area is being created. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: N/A (4) Aesthetics Impacts: The proposal would introduce an additional man-made vertical element to the landscape. The proposed monopole plus antenna array would be a maximum of 100 feet above the existing ground surface. The appearance of the monopole would be similar in appearance to existing light standards located along the public right-of-way abutting the subject parcel, but would be taller. Photosimulations provided by the applicant illustrate before and after views of the facility as modeled for several locations: from SE 76th Street looking south; from Lake Washington Boulevard SE looking east; from the southeast corner of the project site looking north; from the NE 44th Street/I-405 overpass looking northeast; from NE 48th and Lake Washington Boulevard looking east; from 111th Place SE looking west; from 1-405 near NE 50th Street (at Kiewit Construction); and, from the west side of I- 405 looking northeast. The photosimulations demonstrate that the monopole would be visible, but they do not show the facility to be obtrusive, or blocking existing views. It is clear that visual complexity of the area would increase, and that the monopole in combination with light standards and signs would add to the visual clutter of the area. This is not considered to be a significant impact though, nor, is it one that can be easily diminished or eliminated without denying the applicant's request, or decreasing the height of the pole. The City's goal is to require collocation to ultimately reduce the number of monopoles in the City. This facility would allow one or two other purveyors to collocate at this location, thus eliminating the need for an additional monopole of equal or less height. The applicant is proposing a monopole with a finish that would not produce glare. The applicant is not proposing landscaping around the equipment compound, and have stated in the application that a six-foot high security fence would surround the compound. In order to mitigate visual impacts of the equipment compound, staff recommends that the applicant be required to provide a wall, wood fence, or slatted chain-link fence to screen this portion of the site from off-site areas. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall provide screening around the equipment compound in the form of either: a wall; wood fence; or slatted chain-link fence of an appropriate height to screen the equipment cabinets from off-site areas. The applicant shall submit a drawing and written description of the design solution to meet this mitigation ACUERC.DOC 'City 6fRenton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Conditional Use Permit& ronmental Review Committee Staff Report , WESTERN WIRELSS AT SHURGARD LUA-97-092„CU-A,ECF • REPORT AND DECISION OFSEPTEVIBER 16,1997 Page4 of 12 measure to Development Services Division project manager, prior to the issuance of a building permit. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance (Code Section 4-6), Wireless Communications Ordinance (4666). B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF X DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment and Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment and Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Appeal Period. Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall provide screening around the equipment compound in the form of either: a wall; wood fence; or slatted chain-link fence of an appropriate height to screen the equipment cabinets from off-site areas. The applicant shall submit a drawing and written description of the design solution to meet this mitigation measure to Development Services Division project manager, prior to the issuance of a building permit. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. 1. Applicant shall comply with applicable local, regional, state, and federal laws and ordinances in constructing and operating the facility. 2. Applicant shall provide a copy of the Federal Aviation Administration Notice of Proposed Construction to the City. PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT & DECISION This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. ACUERC.DOC • 'City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Conditional Use Permit& ronmental Review Committee Staff Report . WESTERN WIRELSS AT SHURGARD LUA-97-092„ CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFSEPTEMBER 16,1997 PageS of 12 A. Type of Land Use Action x Conditional Use--Administrative Binding Site Plan Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Special Permit for Grade&Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. T-1, Site Plan (Received July 3, 1997). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. A-1, Project Plan, (Received July 3, 1997). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. A-2, Exterior Elevations, (Received July 3, 1997) Exhibit No. 5: Photosimulations (Received July 21, 1997, September 5, 1997, and September 15, 1997). C. Project Description/Background: The applicant, Western Wireless is proposing to install a wireless communications facility consisting of an 85- foot high monopole, with 12 antennas (each an additional height of 15 feet), and four equipment cabinets (approximately the size of tall file cabinets). The facility would occupy a 400 square foot area of the existing Shurgard Storage commercial business at 1755 NE 48th Street in the north portion of the City. This area is generally referred to as the "Exit 7" since the 1-405 Exit No. 7 on and off-ramps are located just south of the site. Several wireless communications purveyors have been permitted to install facilities on the roof of the Shurgard buildings in recent years. This application differs in that it is the first with a monopole structure. The overall height of the facility would be 100 feet, and the monopole would be visible from off-site areas. The existing ground elevation is 36 feet above sea level. The applicant has stated that the height of the monopole was determined in order to meet engineering requirements and to provide an opportunity for other purveyors to collocate,while allowing adequate separation of facilities. The site is zoned CA (Commercial Arterial). This facility is considered to be a Monopole II facility based on definitions in the City's recently adopted Wireless Communications Ordinance. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now makes and enters the following: D. Findings 1) CONSISTENCY WITH CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA Section 4-31-36 lists 11 criteria that the decisionmakers are asked to consider, along with all other relevant information, in making a decision on a Conditional Use application. These include the following: A. CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ZONING CODE& OTHER ORDINANCES: ACUERC.DOC • 'City,of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Conditional Use Permit& ,ronmental Review Committee StaffReport , WESTERN WIRELSS AT SHURGARD - LUA-97-092„ CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 16,1997 Page6 of 12 The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose,goals, objectives and standard of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. (1) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,ITS ELEMENTS AND POLICIES The proposed telecommunications facility is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan policies: Policy U-1: Utility facilities and services should be consistent with the growth and development concepts directed by the Comprehensive Plan. The City of Renton's business, industrial, and residential development is growing. The expansion of the Personal Communication System within the City is to ensure that a high quality of service can be offered to the local and regional community. Policy U-5: Encourage the appropriate siting, construction, operation, and decommissioning of all utility systems in a manner that reasonably minimizes impacts on adjacent land uses. The applicant has stated that the proposed facility has been located and designed to minimize aesthetic impacts of the community while providing a valuable communication service. The design of an 85-foot high monopole with antennas would allow for the collocation of one or two additional carriers, thus reducing the total number of monopoles that would likely occur in the vicinity over time. The nearest residential dwellings are at least 300 feet from the proposed structure. Letters have been received from adjacent property owners who are concerned with the aesthetic impacts of wireless telecommunications structures. Policy U-100: Require that the siting and location of telecommunications facilities be accomplished in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on the environment and adjacent land uses. The monopole has been proposed for location on an existing developed commercial property in the Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone. No environmentally sensitive areas would be disturbed to construct or operate the facility. The 85-foot monopole height with 15 additional feet for antennas was determined to satisfy engineering requirements of the applicant and to provide an opportunity for one or two additional purveyors to collocate on the monopole, consistent with City policy. Photosimulations provided by the applicant show the monopole location from several vantage points:, from NE 48th Street/SE 76th Street looking south, from Lake Washington Boulevard NE looking east, from just off-site looking to the southeast corner of the site. The Environmental Review Committee requested additional photosimulations to be provided from 111th Place SE looking west, from 112th Avenue SE looking southwest, from 1-405 near the northern city limits looking south, and from Ripley Lane looking east. The applicant has provided additional view angles but not from the locations specified. Thus far, the photosimulations do not raise concern regarding the aesthetic impact of the facility, however, it is still unclear whether the aesthetic impact from adjacent off-site areas, especially residential areas is minimal. Whether or not the proposal complies with this policy has not yet been adequately demonstrated to staff. The applicant has been contacted and is expected to provide the additional photosimulations prior to the Environmental Review Committee meeting on September 16, 1997. Policy U-101: Require that cellular communication structures and towers be sensitively sited and designed to diminish aesthetic impacts, and be collocated on existing structures and towers wherever possible and practical. The applicant states that the specific location was selected as it is far removed from residences, and none of the surrounding land uses would be detrimentally affected by the operation of an antenna array at this site. Further, the applicant maintains that the existing impacts of the commercial mini-storage use would not have any further effect on neighboring properties beyond what they are already experiencing. The applicant affirms that the principal effect on neighboring properties would be visual. And that the impact would be minimized to the extent possible through the selection of a monopole versus a lattice tower. ACUERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Conditional Use Permit& ronmental Review Committee Staff j`'Report , WESTERN WIRELSSAT SHURGARD LUA-97-092„CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 16,1997 Page7 of 12 In addition, the area selected for the project is as far from the surrounding residential land uses as possible. Staff would beg to differ with the applicant on the justification provided with regard to diminished impacts. While the monopole would be sited a minimum of 300 feet from adjacent residential land uses, the aesthetic or visual effects would be substantially greater than the existing commercial use. The height of the monopole would be visible from surrounding on-site and off-site areas, and if any marking or lighting is required to satisfy the requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration, the visibility of the structure would increase. Staff has received two letters from surrounding property owners which state concerns regarding the aesthetic impacts of the proposal. The proposal would allow the collocation of an additional one or two purveyors on the monopole,which would meet the intent of the Comprehensive Plan policies for collocation. (2) ZONING CODE The project site is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA). The CA Zone allows for the construction of medium utilities (wireless base stations) providing that an administrative conditional use permit is approved. However, the recently adopted Ordinance 4666 - Wireless Communications Facilities supersedes the use portion of the Zoning Code, and also allows this type of structure -- a Monopole II -- in the CA with an administrative Conditional Use Permit. The CA Zone limits the heights of structures to a maximum of 50 feet. Heights may exceed that maximum height with a conditional use permit. As proposed, the project exceeds the 50- foot height limit of the CA Zone. Ordinance 4666 regulating Wireless Communications Facilities permits Monopole II structures (freestanding structures less than 150 feet in height) in the CA Zone subject to an Administrative Conditional Use Permit. The permitted height for a Monopole II structure shall be 35 feet higher than the regular permitted maximum height for the applicable zoning district, or 150 feet, whichever is less. Given this criteria, the height of the monopole at this site would be limited to 85 feet, as proposed. In addition, Ordinance 4666 allows antennas to extend 15 feet above the support structure. As proposed,the 85 foot high monopole with 15 foot antennas would meet the requirements of Ord. 4666 in concert with the requirements of the CA Zone. The CA Zone requires additional setbacks and landscaping for lots abutting residentially zoned parcels. These requirements would not apply to the proposal, as the subject site is not located adjacent to residentially zoned parcels. The closest residentially zoned parcels are at least 300 feet from the subject site. (3) ORDINANCE 4666-- WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES The proposal is regulated by the recently adopted Wireless Communication Facilities Ordinance. Monopole facilities of greater than 60 feet but less than 150 feet in height are considered to be Monopole II facilities. The proposed structure would is permitted in the CA Zone, subject to an Administrative Conditional Use Permit, provided it is set back a minimum of 300 feet from any adjacent residentially zoned parcel. The monopole would be located at least 300 feet from the closest residentially zoned parcel. B. COMMUNITY NEED: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination of community need, the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among all other relevant information: (1) The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. There are presently several wireless communications facilities located on the roof of the existing Shurgard Storage commercial business. However, these are all roof-mounted ACUERC.DOC • 'City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Conditional Use Permit& ronmental Review Committee Staff Report WESTERN WIRELSSAT SHURGARD LUA-97-092„ CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 16,1997 Page8 of 12 facilities, and do not provide the area of coverage sought by the applicant. The Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance encourages collocation of facilities, and an 85-foot high monopole would allow collocation of one or two additional carriers, based on service area and equipment separation requirements. The applicant maintains that the customer demand for wireless communications facilities demonstrates the need at this location. They also state that the proposal would be different than the other purveyors that have roof-mounted equipment. This site does have a concentration of wireless communications facilities, but the applicant maintains that it is not an overconcentration. The design of this facility would enable additional purveyors to collocate without necessity of constructing additional monopole sites in the immediate vicinity. (2) That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. The proposed location is part of a commercial area with zoning that permits primarily retail and service uses. Wireless base stations are defined as medium utilities,which are permitted in the CA Zone with an Administrative Conditional Use Permit. Existing wireless communications purveyors are located on the subject parcel, but as roof-mounted equipment. The site appears to be suitable for the proposed use. C. EFFECT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. The following site requirements shall be required: (1) Lot Coverage: Lot coverage shall conform to the requirements of zone in which the proposed use is to be located. The proposal would occur on a portion of the site that is existing impervious surface. The equipment compound would be a 20-foot by 20-foot leased area. This 400 square foot compound area would not measurably increase lot coverage of the 126,000 square foot site. Permitted lot coverage in the CA Zone is 65%, and the proposal would be far less than this. (2) Yards: Yards shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in any required yard. The proposed facility would meet the setback requirements of the CA Zone. (3) Height: Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Spires, belltowers, public utility antennas or similar structure may exceed the height requirement upon approval of a variance. Building heights should be related to surrounding used in order to allow optimal sunlight and ventilation, and minimal obstruction of views from adjacent structures. Heights of structures in the CA Zone are allowed to be a maximum of 50 feet. However, the Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance (4666) permits Monopole II facilities to achieve a height of up to 150 feet, depending on restrictions of the applicable zone. Ordinance 4666 allows Monopole II structures to exceed the height of the zoning by 35 feet, plus an additional 15 feet for antennas. This would result in an 85-foot monopole in the CA Zone, with an additional 15 feet of antennas for an overall height of 100 feet above ground level. As proposed, the facility would meet the requirements of the zoning in combination with the Wireless Communications Ordinance The height limits for Monopole II structures as stipulated by Ordinance 4666 are generally understood to supersede the height limits of the CA Zone for wireless communication facilities. In addition, whenever the standards of the Zoning Code conflict with standards of other ordinances, the decisionmaker may decide which prevails. In this instance, no variance or conditional use permit for excess height that would be required. ACUERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Conditional Use Permit& ronmental Review Committee Staff Report WESTERN WIRELSSAT SHURGARD ,, e LUA-97-092„ CU-A,ECF . REPORT AND DECISION OFSEPTEMBER 16,1997 Page9 of 12 D. COMPATIBILITY: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. (Ord 3599, 1-11-82) The applicant states that the proposal is located in a commercial area, is a commercial enterprise, and is intended to avoid impacts to residential neighborhoods. The facility would be located adjacent to an existing storage building, and is at least 300 feet from the nearest residential use. Staff concurs that the proposed use is generally compatible with the commercial area. E. PARKING: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased to as much as seventy-five percent (75%) of the lot coverage requirement of the zone, in which the proposed use is located, if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. (Ord. 3903, 4- 22-85) The proposed facility would not displace parking or require additional parking. Maintenance of the facility would require a visit to the site approximately once each month, and existing parking would be utilized to accomplish the maintenance. The occasional service vehicle should not require the addition of any additional on-site parking. F. TRAFFIC: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in the surrounding area. Not applicable. Use of the facility would generate only one trip to and from the site each month for maintenance. The occasional service vehicle trip would not adversely affect the traffic on the adjacent roads. G. NOISE, GLARE: Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. The monopole, antennas and equipment cabinet are not expected to generate noise, light or glare. The facility would have a small fan which would generate negligible noise. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) will need to be consulted to determine whether or not lighting or marking of the proposed 85-foot high monopole (plus 15 foot high antennas-- resulting in a 100-foot high monopole) is needed. If lighting is required, glare could occur. Glare from the monopole itself is not expected to result, as it would be painted with a non-glare finish. H. LANDSCAPING: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by building or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. The applicant has not provided a landscaping plan as part of the proposal. The compound location is currently partially screened by an existing building and a low wall is shown on the photosimulations to screen the compound. The monopole would be installed in an area that is currently asphalt, and the applicant has submitted a letter stating that they would like to provide landscaping in conformance with Renton's Telecommunications Ordinance. Staff will recommend that the approval of the conditional use permit be conditioned upon the provision of acceptable screening around the base of the equipment compound. Acceptable screening includes a wall, chain-link fencing with slats, wood fencing, or landscaping as prescribed in the Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance. ACUERC.DOC 'City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Conditional Use Permit& ronmental Review Committee Staff Report WESTERN WIRELSSAT SHURGARD LUA-97-092„ CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFSEPTEMBER 16,1997 Pagel of 12 /. ACCESSORY USES: Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are located. Not applicable. J. CONVERSION: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the provisions of this Chapter. Not applicable. IC PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities, and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditional upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities, utilities, and/or services. Public improvements already exist at this site. No new improvements will be required as part of this project. 2) REQUEST: The Applicant, Western Wireless, has requested approval for Administrative Conditional Use Permit for a proposed Personal Communication Services (PCS) facility at 1755 NE 48th Street. The proposal includes the installation of an 85-foot high monopole with an 12 antennas resulting in an additional 15 feet of height. Four radio equipment cabinets are also proposed. 3) ADMINISTRATIVE CONDITIONAL USE: • The applicant's administrative conditional use application generally complies with the requirements for information for conditional use. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 1 through 5. 4) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area- Commercial (EAC). 5) ZONING: The proposal complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the CA (Commercial Arterial) Zone. 6) WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE: The proposal as presented, generally complies with the requirements and standards of the Wireless Communications Ordinance with the following exceptions: 1) no landscaping or screening has been proposed surrounding the equipment compound. Ordinance 4666 states that Monopole II facilities shall be landscaped in conformance with City Code Section 4-31-34, Landscaping. A minimum landscaping area of 15 feet is required surrounding the facility. Landscaping is to include trees, shrubs, and groundcover. However, Ordinance 4666 states that the Administrator or his/her designee may permit alternates and modifications, providing that the proposed design and/or methodology is satisfactory and complies with the provisions of this Chapter and that the materials, method or work offered is, for the purpose intended, at least the equivalent of that prescribed in this Chapter in suitability, strength, effectiveness, durability, safety, maintainability and environmental protection. Staff will recommend that the applicant provide landscaping to meet the intent of Ordinance 4666, or, a suitable alternative form of screening such as a wall or fence. . 7) EXISTING LAND USE: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: commercial; East: vacant and residential; South:commercial; and West: Interstate 405. ACUERC.DOC ' 'City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Conditional Use Permit& onmental Review Committee Staff Report WESTERN WIRELSS AT SHURGARD LUA-97-092„ CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 16,1997 Pagel1 of 12 E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal generally complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2) Specific Land Use (e.g. Administrative Conditional Use Permit) issues were raised by various City departments as follows: a) Airport Manager commented that the proposal requires that a Notice of Proposed Construction must be submitted to and approved by the FAA. The base elevation of the facility is 36 feet. The overall height of the monopole, antennas, and base elevation equals 136 feet. 3) The proposal generally complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Commercial and the Zoning designation of Commercial Arterial. The facility is not considered to be redevelopment of the entire site and would not trigger the landscape frontage requirement of and by itself. 4) The proposal generally complies with the Ordinance 4666 regulating Wireless Communications Facilities. The applicant will need to provide an appropriate measure of screening around the equipment compound -- either with landscaping, a wall, or fencing, or a combination thereof. F. Decision The Administrative Conditional Use Permit for Western Wireless at Shurgard at 1755 NE 48th Street, File No. LUA-97-092,ACU, ECF is approved subject to the following conditions. 1. The applicant shall submit either: 1) a landscape plan to the City's Development Services Division which provides for the installation of a dense screen of ornamental vegetation on the perimeter of the equipment compound; OR, 2) a detail of the proposed fence design or wall design that demonstrates how the wall/fence would screen the equipment compound from off-site areas. SIGNATURES: 7-is-29 ,a'rnes C.Hanson,Zoning Administrator approval date Michael D.Kattermann,Zoning Administrator approval date TRANSMITTED this 22nd day of September, 1997 to the applicant and owner: Shurgard Storage 1755 NE 48th Street Renton, WA 98056 Western Wireless attn: Samantha Kang 330 120th Avenue NE, Suite 110 Bellevue, WA 98005 TRANSMITTED this 22nd day of September, 1997 to the parties of record: N.J. Totton HAL Real Estate Investments ACUERC.DOC `City ofRenton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Conditional Use Permit& ronmental Review Committee Staff Report -WESTERN WIRELSS AT SHURGARD LUA-97-092„ CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFSEPTEMBER 16,1997 Page12 of 12 2125 Western Avenue, Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98121 Howard Seelig POBox1925 Bellevue, WA 98009 June Huson Katrina Hoof 11030 SE 76th Street Newcastle, WA 98056-1607 TRANSMITTED this 22nd day of September, 1997 to the following: Larry Meckling-Building Official„ Neil Watts-Public Works Division, Art Larson-Fire Marshal, Lawrence J.Warren-City Attorney, South County Journal Environmental Determination(DNS-M): The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on Monday, October 6, 1997. Written comments shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. Land Use Action Appeals APPEAL: This administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM October 6, 1997. Appeals to the Hearing Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 235-2501. Appeals must be filed in writing, together with the required $75.00 application fee, to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. ACUERC.DOC • • :. ER`V1fCE<�BY�)IA�IL�IV'....: ����><���` ''<'<��'<'<`�><<``����' ` �< ``>�» ��``�`<�````<``<>>�»> : :::::::;»:<.>::»:.;::.;;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:<.:.;;:.;;;:.:.;;:.;:.;:.;:;.::;:;.::.>::;::.;;:;.;:.::;:.;::>:.;:.;:.;:.: ...........................................................:......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... On the 11 `. day of Sepi eW cerT , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERC. •Weronwna rvt% documents.. This information was sent to: Name Representing • Department of Ecology • Don Hurter WSDOT KC Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities • Duwamish Indian Tribe • Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Rita Perstac • Puget Power (Signature of Sender) k• Sen-er STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) • • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 64- /DR/4- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ttt Dated: q/j 99 ( S�M do '� c)I �. ,, r*, Notary Public in for the St f of Wash' s`-;a; Notary(Print) MAR ARE .ki-ALw, My appointment expirerOrAMISgION Fx?Ipl9zg'yfwogi°- • • Project Name: Wp tAreless sw.mtivti Project Number: LU fl _1 1— 011, GU-A,• E( NOTARY.DOC _ • ON CITE :�F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department - `�' o Greg ggi n g Zmmerma P.E., mnsraor Adiitt•. . Jesse Tanner,Mayor ' . - • .1 September 18, 1997. • Mr. Kirk Vinish Western Wireless 330-120th Avenue NE,-S#110 - - . 1 Bellevue,WA ,98005 SUBJECT: Western Wireless at Shurgard '• Project No. LUA-97-092,CU-A,ECF Dear Mr:Vinish: _. This :letter is'written on behalf:of the Environmental Review.Committee ;(ERC) and the Zoning Administrator have completed their review of the subject project.,:,The:ERC, on September 16,1997, 'issued a threshold Determination of :Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation:Measures.';See the enclosed:Mitigation Measures document:'..The Zoning Administrator, on September;18, 1997,'approved the Administrative Conditional Use with conditions. Please refer to the : ::staff report and decision enclosed. ,:" _ The`15.day:comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently:'" The -comment/appeal periods for this project will end at;5:00 PM on Monday,.October 6, 1997 Written comments.shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor.-'Information'on the project file:and the.mitigation measures imposed.by: • 'the City.of Renton's Environmental ,C ReviewCommittee:are:available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, ",•Municipal Building, Renton, Washington' 98055: Phone:,.235-2550:'Appeal procedures are available in the CiityClerk's; • office,First Floor,Municipal Building. a>-•. The administrative land use decision will become:final if the decision_,is not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on'or before5:00 PM October 6,..1997. Appeals to the Hearing Examiner are:governed by City of Renton ..' Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. 'Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton { City Clerk's:Office, (425) 235-2501. Appeals must be filed in writing,together with the required$75.00application fee, to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,.WA 98055. , The • information will assistyou'inplannin for im lementation of your project and enable you to exercise our-:.- preceding -. planning P P 1 Y appeal rights more fully,'if you choose to do so.' If you have any questions,or desire clarification of the above, please call - me at(425) 277-6186. - For the Environmental.Review Committee, Jennifer Toth Hennin Project ana er :;: M g ,• . • cc Parties'of Record: :Mr. N:J:.Tolton, Mr. Howard Seeli ••Ms:June Huson Shur and 9 Stora a/Pro' ertOwners: - 9 P Y - . • t1. _ t•c- I. _ _7 ''ts~ En SMLTR.Doe •`DN - ',200 Mill AvenueSouth .Renton;Washington 98055'`':' :;::" ; CITY.OF RENTON "DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE II (MITIGATED) . i MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS , - k p :' APPLICATION NO(S): :LUA-97-092,CU.-A,ECF :' APPLICANT: Western Wireless " PROJECT NAME: : ' , Western Wireless at Shurgard :`. , : DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL Applicant .' proposes . to `.install : an 85-foot high telecommunications monopole mounted with a total of 12 panel antennas mounted at the top, of the monopole which would achieve an overall height of 100 feet from the ground surface. Four-30-inch by 30-inch by 6-foot high equipment cabinets would be located near the monople. • - A 6-foot"high •chain-link fence would surround the equipment compound. :.The project requires - environmental review and an administrative;;conditional'-use,permit in zorder, to locate in the... .: ;Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone: ; , " : , 'Street OPOSAL: 1755 NE 48th Str LOCATION OF PR • - _ .. ••'am^„' 1 ^Y es rt.;;. _iti•ration Mea sur a,. rovide screening°around the .e ui ment corn ound in the form of ; °1. =The�applicant sh, Il p g• ._ . q :P. F_ _P :either a wall; wood fence,or slatted,chain-link fence yof.an, appropriate height to _ ` .:screen the equipment cabinets from''off-site areas: -The applicant shall submit a, drawing and written"description of the design solutionto meet this measure ". .:to Development Services'Division project manager;_prior:to the,issuance of a building _ ermit. ., P. _ The Administrative Conditional Use Permit for Western Wireless at Shurgard.at 1755 NE 48th,': Street; File No. LUA-97-092,'ACU, ECF is approved subject to the following conditions:." . . f 1.. •The applicant shall submit either 1) a landscape plan to the City's Development Services . ' • Division which provides for the installation of a dense screen of ornamental vegetation on the ' C, perimeter of the equipment compound; OR,2) a detail of the proposed fence design or wall _ f wall/fence that demonstrates how the would screen the equipment compound from off-. : ,- .., , , 1! site areas: • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE - (MITIGATED) . ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): ; LUA-97-092,CU-A,ECF APPLICANT: . Western Wireless PROJECT NAME: Western Wireless at Shurgard DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL •Applicant proposes to install an 85-foot high . telecommunications monopole mounted with a total of 12 panel antennas mounted at the top of.the monopole which would achieve an overall height of 100 feet from the ground surface. Four 30-inch by 30-inch by 6-foot high equipment cabinets would be located near the monople. - : A 6-foot high chain-link fence would surround the equipment compound. The project requires - environmental review and an administrative;.conditional.use permit in order to locate in the • Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone. ::-;`; h r. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL .1755 NE 48th-Street AdvisoryNotes to A lican't: - Applicant :J: The followingnotes'ere rsup: lemental information provided in.conjunction with the environmental determination. Because;these notes are provided as information only, they are notsubject to the appeal process for environmental determinations.' • 1. Applicant shall comply with applicable local,regional,:state, and federal laws and ordinances in constructing and operating the facility: 2. Applicant shall provide a copy of the Federal Aviation Administration Notice of Proposed Construction to the City. : CITY OF.RENTON • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES . APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-092,CU-A,ECF,, APPLICANT: - Western Wireless ' ' PROJECT NAME: • Western Wireless- at Shurgard• DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: ' Applicant proposes to . install an 85-foot high - telecommunications monopole mounted with a total of 12 panel antennas mounted at the top : of the monopole which would achieve..an overall height of 100 feet from the ground surface. Four 30-inch by 30-inch by 6-foot high equipment,cabinets would be located near the monople. A 6-foot high chain-link fence would surround the equipment compound. The project requires environmental review and an administrative conditional -use permit in order to locate in .the Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone: ,.. ''•w' LOCATION OF PROPOSAL •. ;�. '`-.'1755`NE48th Street _:� • -t1l . • - • - '! 'J; {«l. • ~fir. • s{ - art:; - }, - .. icant: S fNo'votes to'A 1 'so `�� ry PP "��-� .-•The'following-notes are sup'plemental:)nformafion provided In,conjunction with thee :. .: ` ..: - environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only; ` .: ; they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. _..';. t";;: r: ' 1: , • Applicant_.. shall comply:with applicable local,'regional,'state, and•federal laws and • , '_ ' ordinances in constructing and'operating the facility:.;,> ' -: _ 2. ;',Applicant shall provide a copyofthe Federal Aviation Administration Notice of ,.: Proposed Construction to the City: ` :° : ; • • s - C IT �OF.-�RE NTON a` - „:� -• ding/Public Works Department eAdministrator • :• Planning/Bur 1 esse Tanner,Mayor - '._ ... Gregg Zimm rinan P.E.,'Ad 'mist t lir September 18, 1997 . .Washin ton State De' artmerntof Ecolo Environmental Review Section ,. - =`: . PO Box 47703 Olympia,WA.98504-7703 Subject: ._ - Environmental Determinations _ %; Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project / reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on September 16, 199T: • - : ' DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED• ,: .,;:•,.-, .... '. :-WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD' UA-9T-092 CU-A ECF <-.� .L - Applicant proposes to install.'an,85•-foot high'telecommunications;monopole mounted,with"a total of 12 -: panel antennas mounted at the top of the.monopole which.would achieve an overall height of 100.feet -.• '_:: ','from the round surface =Four=30-inch by 30=inch by:6-foot high.equipment cabinets'would be:located - - =":'near•the:mono le.':'A 6-foot highchain-liink-fence_would surround t,e.equipment compound. :The._.,,, `:. ._: .- - . .. .A - - . r ....., ,.t .,-: _ r.p - - •--._,.;._.-.•:;..,: ; ,.protect-requires environmental.revrewandan.admmw trative contlittonal usepermit in orderao locate-in::', -the Commercial Arterial (CA)Zone Location: •=1755,NE 48,th St. - . ' : ;-The:'15 day comment and appeal enod for thisproject will run con -currentl .;:The Comm ent/a eat penods for this: :' ::':project will end at 5:00 PM on Monday,'October 6,.1997.: :Written comments shall be forwarded to the Development Services:Division Land Use Review Supervisor: ;Information.on'the,project file:and the Mitigation measures•imposed by the City of Renton's'Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division,Third Floor, ' Municipal Building, Renton;Washington 98055..'Phone`'235-2550. :Appeal procedures are available in:the City.Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. - `r' If e uestio s lease call meat 425 2 - t you have q r n , p ( ) 77-6186: For the Environmental Review Com_ mittee, :, :: , r • Je ' er Toth Hennin = - Project Manager cc :;.:,'- King Count y Water Pollution Control Division Metro. - . Larry Fisher,-Department of Fisheries : :-. - David F.":Dietzman De nt o a i :;r . , :., ., rtmen f.N turalResources, • - : Don Hurter'De artme T , -.-, p nt.ofTransportation: - Shirley :S hiri ukhan eattle•Public ilities - Y 9� Ut .. aTribal Duw mi sti - �Office `ffi Rod Malcom,Fisheries esho, , Muckl ot Indian Tribe Ordinance - ';� - Rita c`- - ::;' - Pe �a ".P o`rst u\ P vice``et r� - 9 iY' `-f .r : „ :r f ll: , • _ �.t.A NCYL�TR.DQC\- `' 200 Mill Avenue'South'=Reri tonWashingtoriC980s5 •r . :i,'- :''T isa ei'contai ns 50%recYcl dr inate�al 20a/ROSi consunBf'r ' • ..;,;:: * ' \____________________________ CIT• Y;OF RENTON. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEAS• -URES'AND-CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): ; LUA-97-092,CU-A,ECF .,APPLICANT: Western Wireless PROJECT NAME: Western Wireless at Shurgard ;" :,.' DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: :, Applicant . proposes :: to install an 85-foot high telecommunications.monopole mounted with a total of .12 panel antennas mounted..at the top ., .. of the monopole which would achieve an overall height-of,100 feet from the ground surface.: .. Four 30-inch by.30-inch by 6-foot high equipment cabinets would be located near the monople. :. , - A 6-foot high chain-link fence would aurrouridjthe'equipment compound. The. project requires environmental .review and an administrativeconditional.use permit in order to locate in-:the :`.. .Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone;\. iq `'-; yY LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: y `1:755 NE 48th�` tre t:°� .2v. _ ms. . °E iq - a s�- ..:...,.':.....:.:,..:.,......,,:.;..', • - • " - Mite anon-Measures`: _ - -d �s > ' _C:siwm•.. f e ey. - S a` `"t -, , The a plicant shall �-rovide screenin 'around the a iii ±merit corn ound in the:form of ;either: a wall; wood fence; or`sl'atted chain-link fence of an appropriate height fo screen the a ui equipment cabinets`from'off-site areas:`The a licant shall submit a drawing and written description:of the design solution toenieet this mitigation measure -:, `- to Development Services Division project manager, pnor.to the issuance"of a building errn'it. 'The Administrative Conditional Use Permit for.Westerri Wireless at Shurgard at.1755 NE 48th`: - Stree File No."LUA-97-092,ACU, ECF.is approved subject,to the following conditions • 1, The applicant shall submiteither ::1)a.landscape`plan to the City's Development Service•s;: Division which provides for the:installation of a dense screen of ornamental vegetation on the ::;', perimeter of the equipment compound; OR,2).a detail of the proposed fence design or wall design that demonstrates how the wall/fence would screen the equipment compound from,off- :•� - site`areas. - - . - t ;7': ., , t.r�, \1 r� l;t - 'lr. Lt': . :4. •J: ` 3` �:pa _ CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-092,CU-A,ECF APPLICANT: Western Wireless PROJECT NAME: Western Wireless at Shurgard DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to install an 85-foot high telecommunications monopole mounted with a total of 12 panel antennas mounted at the top of the monopole which would achieve an overall height of 100 feet from the ground surface. Four 30-inch by 30-inch by 6-foot high equipment cabinets would be located near the monople. A 6-foot high chain-link fence would surround the equipment compound. The project requires environmental review and an administrative conditional -use permit in order to locate in the Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1755 NE 48th Street Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall provide screening around the equipment compound in the form of either: a wall; wood fence; or slatted chain-link fence of an appropriate height to screen the equipment cabinets from off-site areas. The applicant shall submit a drawing and written description of the design solution to meet this mitigation measure to Development Services Division project manager, prior to the issuance of a building permit. The Administrative Conditional Use Permit for Western Wireless at Shurgard at 1755 NE 48th Street, File No. LUA-97-092,ACU, ECF is approved subject to the following conditions. 1. The applicant shall submit either: 1) a landscape plan to the City's Development Services Division which provides for the installation of a dense screen of ornamental vegetation on the perimeter of the equipment compound; OR, 2) a detail of the proposed fence design or wall design that demonstrates how the wall/fence would screen the equipment compound from off- site areas. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-092,CU-A,ECF APPLICANT: Western Wireless PROJECT NAME: Western Wireless at Shurgard DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to install an 85-foot high telecommunications monopole mounted with a total of 12 panel antennas mounted at the top of the monopole which would achieve an overall height of 100 feet from the ground surface. Four 30-inch by 30-inch by 6-foot high equipment cabinets would be located near the monople. A 6-foot high chain-link fence would surround the equipment compound. The project requires environmental review and an administrative conditional use permit in order to locate in the Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1755 NE 48th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. 1. Applicant shall comply with applicable local, regional, state, and federal laws and ordinances in constructing and operating the-facility. 2. Applicant shall provide a copy of the Federal Aviation Administration Notice of Proposed Construction to the City. • J CITY OF RENTON `-' DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) -, APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-092,CU-A,ECF APPLICANT: Western Wireless PROJECT NAME: Western Wireless at Shurgard DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to install an 85-foot high telecommunications monopole mounted with a total of 12 panel antennas mounted at the top of the monopole which would achieve an overall height of 100 feet from the ground surface. Four 30-inch by 30-inch by 6-foot high equipment cabinets would be located near the monople. A 6-foot high chain-link fence would surround the equipment compound. The project requires environmental review and an administrative conditional use permit in order to locate in the Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1755 NE 48th Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on Monday, October 6, 1997. Written comments shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. PUBLICATION DATE: September 22, 1997 DATE OF DECISION: September 16, 1997 SIGNATURES: ����V e tom �1` �� �7 Gregg im an, mrnisfrator DATE Departure t f PI ii ing/Building/Public Works >4-z_z." ._._._- .4,5 _ ,._._ 9// h Sam Chastain,Administrator DATE Community Service Department ' .4) 4 , , 2/1 q7 Lee Wh a r, Fire Chief DATE Renton ' e Department DNSMSIG.DOC f AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Kristina Thompson, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal • DETERMINATION newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE prior to the date ofpublication, referred to, printed andpublished in the English language RENTON,WASHINGTON 9 � The Environmental Review Committee continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County (ERC)has issued a Determination of Non- Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton State of Washington for King County. Municipal Code. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD Journal not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers LUA-97-092,CU-A,ECF onm ntal review CF (andPP 9 Y Environmental re and admin.condi- during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a tional use permit to install telecommunica- tions monopole. Location: 1755 NE 48th St. Western Wireless at Shurgard t The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will as published on: 9/22/97 end at 5:00 PM on October 6, 1997. Written comments shall be forwarded to The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$42.11 1 the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the Legal Number 3651 project file and the mitigation measures • imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are J� /�� available at the Development Services i% I Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, I Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235- gal Clerk, outh County Journal , 2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor,Municipal Building. Subscribed and sworn before me on this Z�'j day of , 19 97 Published in the South County Journal September 22, 1997.3651 _ _ • `011111 1 1/w \\ "•M'•• FF /', NotaryPublic of the State of Washington �Ss►o�►4;3..9e 9 :o+ Ai9•.:i % residing in Renton v txOTAgy `�`� N= King County, Washington —o_ • �,.� PUBL'�' p. /F WASH,.. �`��� NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD LUA-97-092,CU-A,ECF Environmental review and admin. conditional use permit to install telecommunications monopole. Location: 1755 NE 48th St. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on October 6, 1997. Written comments shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. Publication Date: September 22, 1997 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot JJ!)T1OE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION & PROJECT NAME: WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-092,CU-A,ECF - - Applicant proposes to Install an 85-foot high telecommunications monopole mounted with a total of 12 panel antennas mounted at the top of the monopole which would achieve an overall height of 100 feet from the ground surface. Four 30-Inch by 30-inch by 8-foot high equipment cabinets would be located near the monople. A 8-foot high chain-link fence would surround the equipment compound. The project requires environmental review and an administrative conditional use permit in order to locate in the Commercial Arterial(CA)Zone. Location: 1755 NE 48th St. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ' ENVIRONMENT. • ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IDNS-M1; THE 15 DAY COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIOD FOR THIS PROJECT WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. THE COMMENT/APPEAL PERIODS FOR THIS PROJECT WILL END AT 6:00 PM ON MONDAY, OCTOBER 6, 1997. WRITTEN COMMENTS SHALL BE FORWARDED TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LAND USE REVIEW SUPERVISOR. INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT FILE AND THE MITIGATION MEASURES IMPOSED BY THE CITY OF RENTON'S ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ARE AVAILABLE AT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION, THIRD FLOOR, MUNICIPAL BUILDING,RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055.PHONE:235-2550.APPEAL PROCEDURES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE,FIRST FLOOR,MUNICIPAL BUILDING. • (.AND USE ACTION APPEALS THIS ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE DECISION WILL BECOME FINAL IF THE • , DECISION IS NOT APPEALED IN WRITING TO THE HEARING EXAMINER ON OR BEFORE 6:00 PM OCTOBER 6, 1997. APPEALS TO THE HEARING EXAMINER ARE GOVERNED BY CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE ' SECTION 4-8.11B.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE APPEAL PROCESS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE RENTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE,(425)235-2501.APPEALS MUST BE FILED IN WRITING,TOGETHER WITH THE (..,,, ,iayr� bli ry`'` e • a5 46+.•3HeCf • r3SC `ktEMIttlfl ---—---1 1 ogy!! : 4 ," 75' • e4, �. i!, ..• 4 184 183 ii,,p ,, •. tir l i .• 0166., 165 • , g,4 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. •DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ,:-.,Please Include the project NUMBER when calling tor properfile Identification.-, • :..' • CERTIFICATION ' • I, Pk Miivvrri , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . fairriwrok Jr/?97 Signed: •,w • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • • ) SS • COUNTY OF KING ) • • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that lin/1-7r / I VA1/ 71 signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and volivfi ct'SCi ftor the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ,.)�ti }���'`"2'w`' Dated: '///q/9 7 _ Notary Publ nand fo t Stale of Washington Notary (Print) MARGARET J. PULLAR My appointment expirtgQMMISSION EXPIRES 6/9/98 NOTARY,DOC ii ,1111 i \li ,_./rti•T 1 riiii , . __. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-092,CU-A,ECF Applicant proposes to install an 85-foot high telecommunications monopole mounted with a total of 12 panel antennas mounted at the top of the monopole which would achieve an overall height of 100 feet from the ground surface. Four 30-inch by 30-inch by 6-foot high equipment cabinets would be located near the monople. A 6-foot high chain-link fence would surround the equipment compound. The project requires environmental review and an administrative conditional use permit in order to locate in the Commercial Arterial(CA)Zone. Location: 1755 NE 48th St. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION (DNS-M): THE 15 DAY COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIOD FOR THIS PROJECT WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. THE COMMENT/APPEAL PERIODS FOR THIS PROJECT WILL END AT 5:00 PM ON MONDAY, OCTOBER 6, 1997. WRITTEN COMMENTS SHALL BE FORWARDED TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LAND USE REVIEW SUPERVISOR. INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT FILE AND THE MITIGATION MEASURES IMPOSED BY THE CITY OF RENTON'S ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ARE AVAILABLE AT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION, THIRD FLOOR, MUNICIPAL BUILDING,RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055. PHONE: 235-2550. APPEAL PROCEDURES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE,FIRST FLOOR,MUNICIPAL BUILDING. LAND USE ACTION APPEALS. THIS ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE DECISION WILL BECOME FINAL IF THE DECISION IS NOT APPEALED IN WRITING TO THE HEARING EXAMINER ON OR BEFORE 5:00 PM OCTOBER 6, 1997. APPEALS TO THE HEARING EXAMINER ARE GOVERNED BY CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE • SECTION 4-8-11B. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE APPEAL PROCESS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE RENTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE,(425)235-2501. APPEALS MUST BE FILED IN WRITING,TOGETHER WITH THE ;' f /7/ II CORPORATE y GG�!��O.1:: III UJ Q' / P�� ,M1- 441 Q t 3 �"fir , � �`v-'' s� �`" .,i------183 I J � ./ izi Iz, 11a o- n- �z 131 'F SPMBUOB2 - Y �F> SlrrGt SE - 12) 11 `1 2 Z i Iai. ie 9_. y ° " s.e assos, 1!:1 RENTON =.8 ' 1 3 1• 184 1 183 II IQ - it _. '' h;l6 165 sP I o Y• .) FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION "':::`111a':"rlenf-f':°;at"<.'::. `: >' >;;_;; >:_:<:>:>><.:�:_:::<:>:> ..f se: n de::: e< o ect°NUMBERwbelnallin...:for`' Ira . .r..:: :.�. ..:..::.i..:�:c.:....i..on.:.::.::.::::::::...:..:..:.. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-092,CU-A,ECF Applicant proposes to install an 85-foot high telecommunications monopole mounted with a total of 12 panel antennas mounted at the top of the monopole which would achieve an overall height of 100 feet from the ground surface. Four 30-inch by 30-inch by 6-foot high equipment cabinets would be located near the monople. A 6-foot high chain-link fence would surround the equipment compound. The project requires environmental review and an administrative conditional use permit in order to locate in the Commercial Arterial(CA)Zone. Location: 1755 NE 48th St. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION (DNS-M): THE 15 DAY COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIOD FOR THIS PROJECT WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. THE COMMENT/APPEAL PERIODS FOR THIS PROJECT WILL END AT 5:00 PM ON MONDAY, OCTOBER 6, 1997. WRITTEN COMMENTS SHALL BE FORWARDED TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LAND USE REVIEW SUPERVISOR. INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT FILE AND THE MITIGATION MEASURES IMPOSED BY THE CITY OF RENTON'S ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ARE AVAILABLE AT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION, THIRD FLOOR, MUNICIPAL BUILDING,RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055. PHONE: 235-2550. APPEAL PROCEDURES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE,FIRST FLOOR,MUNICIPAL BUILDING. LAND USE ACTION APPEALS. THIS ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE DECISION WILL BECOME FINAL IF THE • DECISION IS NOT APPEALED IN WRITING TO THE HEARING EXAMINER ON OR BEFORE 5:00 PM OCTOBER 6, 1997. APPEALS TO THE HEARING EXAMINER ARE GOVERNED BY CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 4-8-11 B. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE APPEAL PROCESS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE RENTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE,(425)235-2501. APPEALS MUST BE FILED IN WRITING,TOGETHER WITH THE .11/ u CORPORATE ow vue naT V,l° v. in Icy K zi (2) 121 I//,�L,c sc.o)x.c ° �srisxaex Y ,, c 4 *Freer SE t X O et vi' 14 _ �fa#E fVl f1!FI-N ��teec17,1_r ' YIl 1_ �JI , - ,I rl 184 183 6/ j fit s• Yx�166 165 • . IZY L ,. sr.are. • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION e alli' o"=pro" ":.fie<Identi icatior < > `_>:> `< >:;::>;:>:::<>;:<:;::>;Please::.inciude;:the:° ruedNUMB.ER:::..w.,�..:n+c.....n` :f..:..r :.:.. �r,.�:..:::.. :.:.:......#'...:.:. :..:.: .:.::.::..::.:::.::::>:. City ui Renton Department of Planning/Building/I -...;Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: A,v-PO�� COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 08, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-092,ECF,CU-A DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 28, 1997 APPLICANT: WESTERN WIRELESS PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER HENNING PROJECT TITLE: WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD WORK ORDER NO: 78237 LOCATION: 1755 NE 48TH STREET SITE AREA: 2.9 ACRES BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to install an 85 foot high telecommunications monopole mounted with a total of 12 panel atennas. Four, 30 inch by 30 inch by 6 foot high equipment cabinets would be located near the monopole. Project requires environmental review and administrative conditional use permit. imt h.f.; Ld aerially eri ,/ y is A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth 14 Housing 14 Air Aesthetics f _ Water Light/Glare ji Plants Recreation V Land/Shoreline Use X X Utilities % Animals ?t Transportation Y Environmental Health X Public Services k Energy/ HistorkJCultural X.Natural Resources % Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet X The elevation of the base of the communications tower is not stated by the applicant. The overall height of the tower and the antennas is 100 feet above ground level . The location of the proposed tower is approximately 12,000 feet from the airport runway, placing it within the airport' s conical surface. At the proposed site, the elevation of the conical surface is 270 feet, thus the tower and antenna structures cannot be constructed on a base whose elevation exceeds 170 feet above sea level . The applicant should be required to submit a Notice of Proposed Construction to the FAA and receive a determination as to hazard/obstruction prior to issuance of approval/permit. B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Because of the height of the tower and antennas, the applicant may be required to illuminate the tower with red lights. If so, the applicant must be required to monitor the lights and to replace and maintain the lights so that at least one light is in continuous operation. The City Code states that is there is an obstruction that must be lighted, the owner of the property will permit the City to have access for the purpose of light maintenance. The City has neither the equipment or the personnel to do so. (over) We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addi(1(information needed to properly assess this proposal. —I -..,! J at Signature of"rector or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC 1 Rev.10/93 CODE-RELATED COMMENTS (Continued) The inspection and maintenance of obstruction lighting (red lights on the structure) is quite expensive. There is no benefit of the tower to the operation of the Airport, and in fact, if the tower is determined by the FAA to be an obstruction, the tower would be a detriment to the safe operation of the airport. In addition, the City may want to review the lighting requirement to determine whether additional insurance should be required in the event of lighting failure and whether the City should be an additional insured. The Risk Management Office should review this and future structures which are determined by the FAA as an obstruction/hazard and/or for which the FAA recommends lighting. _ A E 01,:-.::::::::::---_-_-:-_-::::::::::::::- -1..0.. —4 . a �_. , _ t 5:}G';./'-- l"A"1; :::::::::-::::::-:-:-:-:-:::::-:-:-:::::- . ca,Al - X:-..±-a:-E:-E:::-.EEEE:a.:--.::-E:-E:-::::':.:-:_:-E:-E:-:--.:-E::-_-_ 'i --... . ____:___:___:___:___:___:___:_f_::::::_:::::::;:i.:_:_.:::::::::::::-___/N it . ‘ ____ 7 I thi. I \ 1 , :..___:_4i,.._:::::::::::::::::;::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::__ T.::::::,x_.:____:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_.:_:_:_:_::_:_:_:_:_________ lej __:::.:::-:::::::::::::::::::::::::;:::::::::::::_:::::::__ 44, Ilea' I IL ha_ , \ti,._ ,i ------.1"7:77.7:7:7:::::::::::"..-_-_-_:_:1 --:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-_-_-_- _-_-_-_-_-_-,......„. ...:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::KgSK:Ef =le: , "±- 1 I _, rii, P AII\ :::::::::::::::::-:::---:::::-:::::::::---_--::::::::::::::::::::::;;E:K:Eafig:K:KSE:K:Ea:::::::::E:::::::E:::::::- - j ::,-T-4 11131110.4 IFID- !Pig :---:::::::::::::::::::----.7-::::::::::-:::-:-.7-.7-:-:-:-.7.-:-=-:---:-::::::::::::::-:_:_:::::::::::::::-:-:-:-:-:_______:_- :LI;limump rii 0,11/44.1__....__ 4.11".•_,, `, ,feey,All`•-, . 1,1-141 ===- __-=_=_==- ' ==-====_=- '=__==_= lltin 1-h ..eseila .a 1, NC_-- • ._ r-i, ._. , --- _---____ _ __ _____ _-- __ _ __ __ _ _ ___ _ ___-_=_- �`�-(��1. Lit � � � . .o Eat.:.:::._ r i- ----,--,--...„.:::::::::_,„:„..„,-.,..„,,,„:„:„.,....„:„..„,„::::::„. „,.....„,,,.,_ \� `-( _I_ -- _ --`-_`-- __ _-_ ____ I Iki "e I��k- a ti,,,6,:.....-.:iimift� D '♦ it. n,, � a\---_ _ - ----- - --- __ --- -- 1 i....: I mil] OCR } �' --=_____ :-=_ - - _-:__- --_- __------_ 1 ® 1 ,- �Y , \ _ _ _ _ = -_- - _= I 1 6'd ; ,mom, ■■ II _ - -��+ �., ` __ 1 ' I not.m�nr- �; off► � o�� ._-41 _________- ___ ____ ___-__- - �,��fl .� 74.,:laricri a__ I V iiit .NO if --. rfir-.Pk] II __ _'m'f \ opui .),r.P ii4r. ...., � I I(�� \ .r;:,` IG, arr V(„Jd n11 . - 4' ':. Ort nWilli��..� IA.t� t 01 IN m �'Ii �, `- loil . 1"(_ • 1:). A i_! 4�y(�� IIn��I'I t�1Qt7 C](a.>ilbE , ri -• 'hunt [ (��� �%"•� t �u 11"IF' �� 00(l 111171=F2x I' ' i �•�A Unr u�iV' .�i � '�r». �y . A " IIIUUU�11 '�lLN.,,i"., �� , \+t+irl 111�Y/// ( -171 1 '-n n.1. ,; , „ ��ao��- ,1„_.,.. .fIL ,_.P ppp le .H.:■I.� piP l'f"� 1/ . , µ• II aye P ilibiLitl 'F1 4 billignglaBeil,Z.:L ■-., 6ID II 7 .. ,...„,„,..,.,..._ , ,_, ,.. • .4 >, a 74.11V) i.�: i.. `�ANFP,:( kr .. - — ___k_..12 )I i git IUIM ' ild ��`Ills,■ -(Ra a_r.Y:�`,�® sef3 ' �l,�t 41 +�112141 r KNN R-10®w II. l '' - , ,Mt . ' '; 3-•,.. !, ..!+`� - e T•LTvex._ tea40, , s\ittlAkililgigliZMF 111:11 LIMA, Wic—Iiikf Al iiM il ! Y A. J a lSAr ::o®- i• io _" tx. , JZ C. C+ PIPC'' i;5 ._iii[fl lk glIPAIF '-' 1 -4(.40 i''' ir r 4 3 I I I...a 1:4 c Eiri.et 4 �►<NIIIIIIIII;itllk ♦ _L- 6/1 it.,__ ....,,,e•• -a • x 417 rI a co a gin..emu,, ✓ NA7:4%14‘4 ,r734 ) de II , ,, ... , , .., c. ._. ._..15. .a wip V;,.,\ . .- wWP � :- - ‘611P2Hilinitil- .1144:::r--- -1_ ---7 / , ,.. .PI . NIL � a . � I. - ,.. Art,, ,..11. . k 1.L...„.,T.r... -,, E-- -J-1--1---ill V dr Eln 6 ' ' :. ' --N I I AR- •, TI: . ,- •-4.- 4\I ‘‘.7.11 1 7 7 w 6 D ft )r__it:flv , 'A I/ il. 4 i : ti NMP 11-6 \I! I 1. "T; lib6+ INLIC-*Wil "" -..1 N mot •.■ RECEIVED PROPOSAL ..� 0 3 1997 JEVELOPML N i PLANNING CITY GF RENTON Western Wireless is seeking an Administrative Conditional Use Permit to build a 85-foot tall structure to support an antenna array. The array.includes 9 panel antennas which are approximately 5.5' long and 6" wide and 3" deep. They come in a neutral color and can be painted, along with the pole, to suit the requirements of the City of Renton. The support structure is made of galvanized steel and will be placed on a metal grate and located in the southeast corner of the Shurgard Storage lot. The communications facility includes four equipment cabinets similar in size and shape to tall file cabinets. Construction will last approximately two weeks and the hours of construction being consistent with the City of Renton's standards for construction. In conformance with the City of Renton Municipal Code and as a matter of corporate policy, Western Wireless uses support structures which are designed for the purpose of collocation by other carriers. PROPOSAL SUMMARY: • COLLOCATABLE SUPPORT STRUCTURE 85-FEET IN HEIGHT • 4 EQUIPMENT CABINETS (SIMILAR TO FILE CABINETS) • 20 BY 20-FOOT LEASED AREA ENCLOSED BY A SECURED 6-FOOT FENCE 111 _ �� �A A,� � i4,378 . . WESTERN WIRELESS 330 120th AVENUE NE,9110 SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 96006 H PHONE (206)451-1260 FAX (206)461-7967 PROPOSED W(.RO-AHTENN FACILItt PROPOSED HACRO-ANTETlIA FACILITY RELEASE / PAT! O416E41 Z061066 RIVEN SET TOP OF ARM • O4.UE41 IOMN6 SET EL.IDOO \ • 71.UE4t REVVED IOINS SET -� Il-LLY91 REVISED ZONN6 SET 1 f---,;.\; • • TOP OF HONOPDLEO \ • REVP F/r6 •MO MP 11 PATE I EL. - 6?VATI REVISED Tap-2 D6'-0'MONOPOLE & . o n n . LP\ t i '......Jti4:; •:.. .ate::;•.: 8 f ARCHITECTS au . I^mT n I« SEATTLE 1:06166-6666 Ir ). -T Q O I • I I I ' II II j,1 THIS DRALINS 5 COPTRIE.Hr T NO 5 TIE 50.E 1 I PROPERTY OF THE CYIER IT 5 PRODUCED III I',, SOLELY FOR LSE ST TIE 01+F32 NO ITS AFFILIATES 'I REPROOGTION CR USE OF TNS DFLA NOASR THE YEOFUMTION CONTAINED WIT IS FORBIDDEN LOCATION OF RADIO ECLIIRENT 1 T4 NCi T THE TR EN F .SS pl OF E OHEA LIX.ATIpl OF RADIO IEH i I S4-LTK GATE ' EGUIPIENi 1� SNTE NArE TEN 6'H116NN Cltl HALL HEH 6'i6H 0.5 FMLL III �' ,,,,,N6 FENL[ '"�::.r:'£ f"�'�,'"•, II EXTENDED MERCER SOUTH f7 s: 'II / _ 1�= "" ��.1� 8HURCiAftD $TORAQE n- j11 1 Tor= E%ISTINS RETAMNS HA/1 4£,� A£,a.v>.a . 7111' I 1\ \ \ "\ .::or TOPO FOUOA , .Odd I SITE N I-EERI 8E3-411-A rSITE ADDRESS I M56 N.E.46TH RFNTE7N MIA.4ESOSE FVENTION BUREAU • if Renton Department of Planning/Building, ublic Works .J U L 2 9 1997 ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIE WS1:5ET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: FwYt P1f2Vfl -T16 /1 COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 08, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-092,ECF,CU-A DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 28, 199.7 APPLICANT: WESTERN WIRELESS PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER HENNING PROJECT TITLE: WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD WORK ORDER NO: 78237 LOCATION: 1755 NE 48TH STREET • SITE AREA: 2.9 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to install an 85 foot high telecommunications monopole mounted with a total of 12 panel atennas. Four, 30 inch by 30 inch by 6 foot high equipment cabinets would be located near the monopole. Project requires environmental review and administrative conditional use permit. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable , More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation • Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet aa) 0 • • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ,/4 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where add" nal information i e ded to properly assess this proposal. Signa,u of Director or Authorized - resentative Date 7/2 097 DEVA P C Rev 10/93 • (;.., ..f Renton Department of Planning/Building, :.blic Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �l IeV!eu)_UY ,-COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 08, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-092,ECF,CU-A DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 28, 1997 APPLICANT: WESTERN WIRELESS PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER HP/Nag HP/Nag RENTON PROJECT TITLE: WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD WORK ORDER NO: 78237 LOCATION: 1755 NE 48TH STREET JUL 2 9 1997 SITE AREA: 2.9 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A bUilLIAN4i DwisioN SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to install an 85 foot high telecommunications monopole mounted with a total of 12 panel atennas. Four, 30 inch by 30 inch by 6 foot high equipment cabinets would be located near the monopole. Project requires environmental review and administrative conditional use permit. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LightGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS IVO CoMM 42 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. A).„,) u/a 7/ o/4 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev 10/9:i I rf 4fRenton Department of Planning/Building,-.-.blic Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 5uifece.I A4 tr COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 08, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-092,ECF,CU-A DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 28, 1997 APPLICANT: WESTERN WIRELESS PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER HENNING PROJECT TITLE: WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD WORK ORDER NO: 78237 Pr v n,- LOCATION: 1755 NE 48TH STREET SITE AREA: 2.9 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A JUL 9 `7737 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to install an 85 foot high telecommunications monopole mounted with a total of 12 panel atennas. Four, 30 inch by 30 inch by 6 foot high equipment cabinets would be IocatediveeHtievaoaopo(pralject requires environmental review and administrative conditional use permit. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Llght/Glare Plants Recreation • Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Histork/Cuitural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 1\.)v GOWt • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.00C Rev 10,93 Renton �blic Works C_�_� _f R n Department of Planning/8wldrny, . ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:7%11,A%i Q eAUM ' COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 08, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-092,ECF,CU-A DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 28, 1997 APPLICANT: WESTERN WIRELESS PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER HENNING CITY OF BEN t LA4 PROJECT TITLE: WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD WORK ORDER NO: 78237 rwnr:;zl ® LOCATION: 1755 NE 48TH STREET JUL 2 9 1037 SITE AREA: 2.9 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/AAa�� t�t�/' SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to install an 85 foot high telecommuni6atiofisgrffollgdi2't�bVAirwith a total of 12 panel atennas. Four, 30 inch by 30 inch by 6 foot high equipment cabinets would be located near the monopole. Project requires environmental review and administrative conditional use permit. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable . Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor. Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation • Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 10o at,ttitttiomid etVCVa1 . deldfilV1IOS aSSociO'ci/ ccJr-t ij ihtotoSa,'. iUo tva 6GG tM I-tr'at/ow -itt vequ,tvell- C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS MO cowl►v1e41 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 7/30/97 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Re, 10/93 • (I __ -If Renton Department of Planning/Building, ,—.blic Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P6_V1 COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 08, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-092,ECF,CU-A DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 28, 1997 APPLICANT: WESTERN WIRELESS PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER HENNING PROJECT TITLE: WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD WORK ORDER NO: 78237 LOCATION: 1755 NE 48TH STREET SITE AREA: 2.9 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to install an 85 foot high telecommunications monopole mounted with a total of 12 panel atennas. Four, 30 inch by 30 inch by 6 foot high equipment cabinets would be located near the monopole. Project requires environmental review and administrative conditional use permit. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation • Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS o � • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or area_ where dditional info ation is eeded to properly assess this proposal. /441(/(1/ V7a(A1(-2 ignature of Director o Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC . . i ,9: • 6;-Df Renton Department of Planning/Building:, Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8, DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Cioh s.v‘ Se .g..6 COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 08, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-092,ECF,CU-A DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 28, 1997 APPLICANT: WESTERN WIRELESS PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER HENNINZ PROJECT TITLE: WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD WORK ORDER NO: 78237 RE{.*�ivED LOCATION: 1755 NE 48TH STREET JUL ? 4 799i/ SITE AREA: 2.9 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to install an 85 foot high telecommunications monoportraillItetrWith#CfchilliON 12 panel atennas. Four, 30 inch by 30 inch by 6 foot high equipment cabinets would be located near the monopole. Project requires environmental review and administrative conditional use permit. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water I Light/Glare Plants Recreation • Land/Shoreline Use , Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health ' Public Services Energy/ HistoridCuitural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS d1,-4�� L P d-C- ( 4 . rdV` p Ticrf J We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date / DEVAPP.DOC Re 10/93 • L.._, of Renton Department of Planning/ Irblic Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1-Aakice COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 08, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-092,ECF,CU-A DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 28, 1997 APPLICANT: WESTERN WIRELESS PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER HENNING - PROJECT TITLE: WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD WORK ORDER NO: 78237 LOCATION: 1755 NE 48TH STREET SITE AREA: 2.9 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to install an 85 foot high telecommunications monopole mounted with a total of 12 panel atennas. Four, 30 inch by 30 inch by 6 foot high equipment cabinets would be located near the monopole. Project requires environmental review and administrative conditional use permit. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Llght/Glare Plants Recreation • Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services V Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Gnat-e, po L , leczvu 91, 1 GiciAlrza/e) u /4 clam Uag_ ' . 0 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to proper/ assess this proposal. n c� Z Signs re of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rey 10/9. ,......,,,,, , ...,;•, ,,,-.;„:,...r.-4,1 ,%-...mit• , --• —.....,,,,. — - - .. ••" - --. ..,. ,- - - : -- .-- --.. ...,-,- •,. 1. ..... .•.... ''. 'tr.'-''.. ''''''..‘' ' .''''''' ''-4//'?. ''''' ''.. .*. .'-'''F"--7'447:.`k*'''''''t: M:it`- •• • ' r .,.,,. ,.,. •,704- - -. !t. . v •,s,, . • .- -..:;›,,t•:- .. . 1,1 ., : • 4H:..„,f•-_ .. .• . , . di . , . . . S. . . ... .. . ,....,t, ,. I I western „:„, . • • . „.„..,_ IA A wireless .. . ., CO' ' : • p4ato seotaaeiopt„ , . :,,y-• •:-.,„ . • _ 'Ab' ''''; Mt•:.. .' .W! . 749./.? •• _... ., •. 1.•,..,,,,, 'S....i••::'...., , ..4. •-•• ' 'i''''!. • , 1-i'!ri • Zi . • • , . . t__ . . ..• . I: if',.Z. ow.. 1111111110. --+iip -4,41., .-P'..d.,zi:- ----..........---..__.- ...._ • ... --. .. 011i:' 1 4_ 011 ,.. . iiiiiar.............• .•.,:;f_. • ' ../. t6• .. ••• • At.h. ., .,, . tr... . -•Ill Aer„.41.. o ....*:„: ',...., ..k... .0.11.4411.1...V.4. ;•,11:2,.........i..e.1 , 4 ,.. ... ' ! .!.44..: M., • -...... ...;tikt 111 IIII I. ,. . .- ,«,--,,,s.:,_? •- , . - .., — i.- "..;,,-,.3,T-.5,Z1/4414-Q .?-47-74,1V.,;:.- ic;f:4,,'..:71;47WIZ.,;;.%:,. ',$, --• .4:-=',..".,-,41:-': •b-rt:h4i,01,A100)4*.liti*?,-;t: , . EXISTING • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .. . , .. • i. . ; . .a 4 . • • .4 . • i ....—..............; SHURGUARD • • , . „. . . . la Y . . k • A . Iiiiiilli ---daill; , • . STORAGE • • ,,.;• ,.„ • i m . • • site #SE-34 1- • ,,,,:„..,..„,„..„:,:„.,,,:.,,,,,..,,,„„..:=.:::„.,.,,,,..,..,„,„.;,,.:„.,..:„,:.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,--,,..,,,,...„._,.,:.4,,,-,„..-,,,,,,,,,,,*„...---4..:-.._, • . . .„, _ - . . • ,,•.•. . : .. . .., ..pi- PROPOSED .. , . . .... .. . ., . . . .. .. • • . . . _. e... • ..... z„.... ..,, ,,_. . , . , ... , . ,. _• . ... ._,. , ....., _ ,. . .. ,.. ._ ,...... . .._,..._..., .. ,...,_ . ._e ....,.... .„.. 'U;f "'N.- .,V/VJW*-74-V• 4t2X-• •+XI. 704.64)-W.41,Mti .- -:'• rtP,At-'4-- 4~,et.• .,wiiva-,,w-&-,Aw.x.,-;,..1.,4..,kaktz4r.-atz,, ,y A§.-;— :—._--:-,,....vs . --..zz.,...,.. ,6,44,i,z, ,ie. . .E.,..,...t. 'ir.43,.. ..... ••-ticst164. .5.361::: • ..', •• .• ... • .. I., , • I 1 western . :. 1 IA wireless v ..4': d'`k-b,'F.*�t's:+}t. #l�+`4"y•' > �"5.)+'- 'c'' -;r°fk"...c'3a... rM.'e 2ir '1?! 4tii • • — •+ , hMir - ■i i F met � A��t:� �M EXISTING : - n • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •.e _, ` • • . SHURGUARD .,,, lor .i,i,,,„ A -. STORAGE 1 : ,, • s to #SE3 411 Ajii ji 4. • 1 LOOKING NORTHEAST • PROPOSED 5 .....;;,7,.n-..:45,..• •of;>y,••. =e,t`c,-- • r ;V.' •74''''' - ' -lb 1'1" ,,a,„„wk. 0. .. -wokir,Asw . - -'"' : .f,"...,,..4:::,--''.-,••"--?...,•'.1L,•-• :`',.*7.41"-W:,---,:%ei,*-•,<f.. •'.M.,i, .'•••--- :;,.. 'S-at,,',....". ''''.,e„...--r-Ster''''•,- ' --. --- r''''' - - '-'i ''''''' .•-•"'-'1:47'. '-'474'. '"--'441'''''' .-• ' - - - -'-. - C9*--;.., '- —-- ;,....,,,..,k.....,••.7102:•..,-r,r..r.ft.T•43,..,,. ..•,,:774 r i..A'r,,y,.3,,.t,,,,..-4.,:.?,?..•,.;z: ,•"!•••.,.,:,,,,,,:,-..--:::: c.,41.2••-:::•.,-,1'02'4 fl1:4'—'"-•qt,--1PF•4-.4444.ts-•'-'-.-.1.4.,Weii.;..-..-.....,. L'.-.... ;-!,4*..,-41, Pf.(414.St- ',,,.',P••'1......., '--..0,:t.,-4---'-',.:.--,'';',.''-. t.-4.• ,7,-•••:;ry -4---. •-s.A.;'-',..vekNi.-44."'-',-,1 . . • •‘••-., - 4 ... . • .- • ' - , • • . • •- , ---,:fam.e.--- ,1-....40.No.,-.'•• :,.-...,-„7.• 4,t."- ..., -41...„,....,..,Lt.,,,-,---tf-,_:.5&-it, ,yz-. -7L--, ii-,-4.4.4,11 .Xe•-c-‘',..,,,74k,,•,11.- 4,--:_v4:-..fp•Iri44X:;',--,?;:•,14,•'•-1/•=dk--ir.44-1.._,• ,.:-,,,,,,..•*^,•••4---4„,.-1-:,"-4 ,,,,_ .„,;,„„ng,..1q.....,-;--.c.,:...-." • N-. ••,,• - • • ...-----•---•'- •- • -,-,-,?„,4,4„,-•-•• •.,-„...fp.,7, --.,••-"A-i,,,.4.-.711,:t4:-&-re-F,2--w-,,,, ,--;•,v-:•.. ..,-,--gz,til..4•'• -'47=".‘t,m ' ,v-k,,-,..,-.1.ki.: •••••q' '-F."'•*.*•."*' T't c , 4*-3-,1e4AT,-kAV,S7clw-tiqt-a•.'i'i4,,-:t.*47,...P.."-.P0,4"-z.••*,-...04,*1.1),?4,17;11V-....'-'j,'elf-tIr!,:i•...!.;,:,,-eir,: .,„,,,,;;,t i.-,4•11.i..,4..„,si,,,eiltm,,,,,:., -,&,,at,,,,i1/4.4Lioil.A".419,t,t,0-4--.07*,n4c5y ..-i, Ell . --'•-• ..‘.* •:=%•1,:44.Y.---&,-.1":943',,,,e i r--*T17*-;---.1,Y,W ., -,4 -; = iz .r*J-4-4..i.m.:v.::4‹---•-:,-;:,-',,,Agii4•1J,",t,7,4:. • -, v•-•,-r..-4i,-,i-A, -,..1.,-,-7,•*:?..4%,.-.t,_-.4-4.-..„,,•,,,,-.•.;.,-..-m,,.-„;„..,-,,,_,:,--t,,,,,,,,,, ,.:,....., .,..„...,.,-7,fro,-,,„....„,__,,„....,..e.., !,..„.4., ,,i-A.• a"""''•'•'' ,1".• , - . ... . 0•,_ . I I western • si • ..,...:: ‘ • 4.. • 4`-• • . t' .. ..... ..,- . . . ,..,.. i i i wireless : ,,„.,/,,,,,,„.p:•,y/4e ,,...:„..• . , •,... -.,.*,:4,,,,f.,,: • . . ... . . . , . ,. . _.:, •.. ...., • . • • .. ,...,...... ..,...... ........•... . .. . , , . . ,...: .,4 • .., ._' .i-,,f-x,,,,-.,,,,,,,-•••,..i--•--•-•-• ..p.*"4-':."W"1.'''- V'lt•A-'-`""--. ' '-----..-'-'4,..,-'''''''',--'-'-',1%c.Anr.",ir-'444—..,-eier4pl'kl4e,"-:,. .. - -,,,--k--...:44E)‘••,,, -..--4''-'2.0.- • ..... •.1.-` 4.:,J,.. .•.. , . -. .., • ••*- -- • . . • ,,,. , . .,,• '•.. 1'1. . • . - - 1 :'r:- ••• • ' i- - --,„ - • -/ , . .— -iii.ac« It . ...%.,ye-- *,-.T. " '.. . ''. 1 ' 14d4b'IlAirjfr la;: •:lit.• .- , `. • , ,..- :.• ' it- : ..- • .',14 0""!st:' ,. . . •,.. ..,,,. ... -. ._ .-: i• - '••,, 1 `ittor-", - '•' -. • '• f,''''' ;,,, , 111 - '"Niillinr,....:1/44;; -7.,” ,;, -.... ...%.-v7;.*.:-:. - •,,:- .n. ,- or f' i .,.. _ w-t-,'. ..-. t it , I' '.1 AI-t'''r'• 'A i 1,, 4"1:•-!•- • ''- . ,..1, . , ,,I,4_.:‘,.•t:,.v1fp.2-. -4 li: •:‘4.,,,"---.-. '...--...-11.,:-".- . •-, '''' +4,-4..7.4 i leta',;•,- .... --•--, y j;,- I •,t.,:"Ati, t.. t i t;,,,'--.?:44,...6%*1 --,,...r".' -.4.1.'iz",,i..' .-. - -, * -:::"7.13t- ,• it• . ,,,, - - •' ' ,.! '1 •Ar.,;; •.'....1 . •'1•-•. • 4• . 1 -..• ' ••• *• *. . ..:, '.* , , ; ,'..'•4 " ....,..:` . ' - , f , ., 1....al ek:.,...4 10-N4:,,,•;:%,-i " '1',1 .- ,: '044,'.....- 4.• .„,,,. „.. • - ,. .. _._4.., , . •,,, \ , N---*---- x • , , •••'. _ ,„,,, :.•tc•.. ,., ...• c.b-.•-,r.4,...-.1.....,-•ti:4-t,,,...;•.t•-••or;.t...,.,-„ i,t'...,..,. '.,•,.. • •• • . • . . , .%,.., styi. t• • ,•• ., • , .. , . ..,-;-• - :--.- -f•-''. : ' '''.• "" 1.'..., . " V` ig.• I -P I- - • ' '' ...„d .,• ,t ' -:. . •-t• , • ^,::•Z ZAL.•• ,.7.4;4 a.4. 14,, •. - • Al''''.1 ' ' '. .- ' .' a,• J :Ark,: -' .'' _W•'• •' '. '•,i.4 . • .. .. _,...i ...v.., hi. •. 4. ' .. s.' ,1#`, 'Pt • ..::•Apt , ..... " "' _ ...I . t it-t• r.'• 4.1`. 1 - _ , • 7,-,- • , 1 -:, . . .. _,. . . , . ,..,_ 7- .• ,-, ., • 4•-•.' I.? . -.. 41, t i .or t•• I.feAt, ' , "••' A* .•%. .4 ,14,. '`k ' - -••.P '. '141/r.' '. 'ft': • - - • - . , •r•1,-• ',., . .. - .. , '- - os - !-,•,,A,'‘'*. .'' . - e '••:..,-.4.4'„ * , 4;is.4 c• .4 - • — • •;41,_ 1-- -41..,..,.,•...-„,*,., .Al.,.., ',....si .4,-* - •-• . -..--- ., ,i.,..,,, • •.-_ ,-,....• ..,..,1 . ,,,,.. ,.. ...• :_.• , .__ ... ., ;--... . ,,,,,,,,-,..• • .--. .--...,.. is ,.., , .... .•,y.: .....„.„„•. ,,,,,II.,.. 4.--. . , ...-a. .. ....• ;;Z.k'z,, ...g , -, 1„, •. . .... .. ... .-A, . ..... v., 1.,. •:... 1• •. ..sr,„,p,. EXISTING • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ,••••- ,. • . • I\•• . _ ., . -• •-e4„. •,.•• •,--.- . •-•=••• .-c., . . ..•.... _ ! ,-. -• •. . ••••:- • -4-,p.,:.:=.,:s,- ,? .A.,- k ..:- 4. • .,- •1• '' 'VT ' " s*4. .4.117. -I,: ' •••• ' ;•---'''...'''':(.i4- i''. ' ' .- 111, •,• t- : •.,. .s..• Si..k.„....- , 5,... t -' • ' SHURGUARD • • .. , ...... ... ...... ... •,.... fr .. ." Y''At ,r•.....;. .. :r•.-•,?!f•• '..,:, 7 • . .... . • '.V,.,. '. /L.,, . a . . ... .litiv...:t-c.'*.. '.. . -%....A. . • _ . , . P•' ,. tY ‘.# STORAGE • • .,. ,_. • 4. ::,... :,. • . n'e • ..,i site #SE,_3411„.A • _ _... .., • • „0„._ PROPOSED Pt,. .1 I T western .. • . - • • t . .4.\ / i 1 lwireless ,. ..... , .• . . ... . , •it '. ,.. . at, i__ _: . 4 . , et !.44.41., . ...„ _ ,,• - ;vat°, semeteareog ... . • , • ,.. ,,••• ,4...r.•• v: • , ••• .4 .116,..., 4 ,' '0 1111 ••••* s • . .4,••• • ,A,...'i. -t14 .1/ A.. : . 044 • •- e ' .'Ali•' ' - tt .. . . A - • - f.' .'••• . '''' N. ..0 . . 4. t , . , . ,./..... , f• :1.... , ; o' -..• • ife.#41 - • 1 * .. . —,--- .4‘"Alliboub *. ... , . ,,---s •-ir ,X. ; . . r• t. ....- . . ..... , , •. ,..... . i Lir.: A...-. • ...„ •-• . a k . r .1r 1 Nall/4404.2.4r4 --t77. ',.la h•lat v v * .. 4 .., i . '... ,. I )." '• t•:•• Atill4 V .1/214 ...#2. ' •. °I s.,...I • 4C . /••• •.1 ..,.ir • , 'iv :.0 , .. .. t".•le'• t „di e ":0 ...**6. ' 11 ;• - .."'' •L.0. . . ... •,p, •v4‘,.#.4" v ' ' 1101.. .... ...,- • .... ...- I ' • \ i EXISTING - • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • - . .... r " • •• „It :-, • , • • . • 0 ' 1 ' et .• A. i 0, • } An : • . .. ,• SHURGUARD • • , .._........... 0. ... t v/V.• „Iii di., 11101,„' . . 4. „ . ..., 1°...• .....--. ...' • I. ,, STORAGE • • . ... . ... - -1,14, . 3. -. $ • • 17; .' site #SE3-411-A .• ill i .. ,.4 LOOKING WEST • , , ...:: • • PROPOSED .... • -"WIC ''''' - : - - .t?'.-.` _,.. . . '•.,!' :-:7,--5 - --4, •z---AZ..''.*1.&'•-•',7A0-4+7*Itrlii-. +riA411`;.W."•,',.4.: 11‘.:5471,---",.,.,;,',-.- -1.,',14,A:,a:,,,A,t'Pg,,:::,A!.','W'-'::..;-;?'•:• ;',.A":7-irt.,.:-"5-,:',T.17.;f:', ..,::,„..'-- :•!;',4' ..,24,Z-fs°4),'4',-.,rm 4:-$4,.a,?*,,,,,,:,.S:3=,.:_-, N-,:,',:k-7.,e-* Ltkv•,,inf,!:-., ,',._:-:::-',.,F':,.>,!,::'',,,-,:77-:7,:',.':',i:_••-, ',:'.-':.i.----,• ,-.:.! ,•-::-4-„,,:.,,,,itef.e.Acr.vf:,t,#. 4,u4r, .,•,,-k?.,,.'., ."-,... . I4 Ii,.„.4,,:. ' .7',-,-,-..:•-•'',',-.-,-:-.-':.western.,,,-....r.,„,..,-,..„,.•:O',.,,':e',:,,_,:I.,.V,,._„.--,-V4,.7',--,,7,* ,,t'-,4t,,,,,-:'.-.ke-.-.;,;,i;'tg3,.v,,,Vm,:,A,,,'.,-,4',44'-.W:W,,,,t.../,t-•,0'.4,41.44tIAD,-4,t'.,K4vWs.-m i.,l,,",tti.ari.v,V-,A-t,.„-,,.4,v,,W.t,.,'.!:--,,:,.,A:.-,.,.:7•',-'.' S j,-:r.,;-. f'-t-i.4,74,,..,'%,.t.-:•-•!--.: : ;,„..! -,--!.,,,*!.;•itg,,,;,,,,i.,-, ; , -,*,:-!,:?1,,, 5;..? lvvireles 7.,:i•.....-....„,,,,,,.....,::::, ,,,:z.,.,,,:,.:,,e,„ , • . . . _ . . !T,o;r:,.ikApi:•%, , ,x*.v.,v:-•i,r„:r, , • :-,; if.4-k;,;,-; ;;,..4•o_i.::,,,4,..--•t ';•.x.;€...s,•,-3,-.c..,_,„z--,r. • . 7 ,:v..:67T*7Fitt.'.v-44,q_ z.,/;; o. .,,g. : ,*.614.pti-KI:mio v ....„. .."1!. - - k .1. - -g.,..k. ..i. .t...,,,....,vit..,,,,<.• , ss .•. , , .• ..,:‘,... ,., .04„th.l.,,, .,...„, , • .., ,z1....„‘„,,,,,..,. „ ., ,f4i, , " 11, , ..,,...1.,..„.„..,v ,,..,3, ...,3,,,.?..., Ilat 3 f,e, , %,*',.', A .''....47..„-.....,,,S4S:',.•W ' " -",'` '.''-•s .'' ' 7)&14 se:04440g, •.:-,-,-- - „,..... ., , -..„,,,,•::,•- i.,,, *-:, .....,‘„...44r,,, „ ,„,,_,r,,,u;s:.,„,, . % ... .,_ .t„, „lox__ ..,„A „ ,, ,..47*„..--...,,v,:!;......,,,,4,-.„,A4tke',... . ,--.F..X.:.,-, Ar,...a -t ..-. 4-.•,.:15,si,, 41,, -.,...,2;-.,..-..-.„.,..44,0"-,-.7.k't, 1, •„-IN '-•:4-1r,A0.--.. ..,.4 t...4.;•-z•f,i .p..7.-...g4 .±. ...,..:4A h.. .014, ,, 4 .:Toyi _ • „-- 1 I --2 ; . -r '-.*$,:`A r•. •.r...... .41 * ._, . . So.• 4 . :,..4,44' 'At 'v'4it ... '':,e0 . 4 k,.. .444 I __:.,_„ ____ ,, I :- '.4'...k4 . - --— - ' - . .., AVIIIIIffiligis • 'V..;1;,4'.., . .• _... . ,.,,..&, , , ',1. , I :. IL. . ...umits2:7.. t .1.A.,!. . 4 I. : , , .., , '0 I es I , .,,..,- , ..-...- " , . EXISTING • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . ..-..i , ::, , . ._. • . - or . . • ie . . 1-1- . . . ., . • - . . .• -im • I ,'',.. :: .-:: ,'. —: - .. . ,-, .• . . SHURGUARD • • ;... . .. ,. , ,.... rb i lit 3 STORAGE • • • _ ....;, . • ,..„ • ii • site # SE3 -4 1 1 -A • • • . . • . _. .. . . . . . , pRopospn „ „ , Y 1 western J ; 1 1 A wireless f ,40 "9.4$4,4*" **** S7i='�3* i `z+`T1d' �7 s 9'tsgb . !' ,r+«..e. - Jilt ,fit . tit*. 4 If _-ram , . Ai frl APIII MM m imi IN .....,,4 ' 4 4 4.tis • iftx-411 ../•4; -.' -.• . H t 3 , _ ti -e4 y 4rs1. •7J 1.1 •- .+•11 1 e EXISTING . . '• • �,..,� .. r ' _:: ram_- ' _a w.. SHURGUARD • ., , . . .. STORAGE • .. .. . / ,P •site #SE3-4 11 -A � , All --c`-' LOOKING EAST • > PROPOSED .. .. elEll L t, atiH.-e,i:r-. ._:x',,...,ncN'Tef:4.,,i N.;fa..F-2...ig, r''...tii,at 4:44. mot. n'_;, .s -^K n Y'., aa. rt,,,, -1':L=; t.;'di cp`s.,.. „ T ^✓a`�� w �.G=3 nr , `ice i/ ''T ��.,' `is `'�t1" ,.$ �a' , ,,. + , k� a �.d - `d �,.�i �r gyro'-- .',, :ear °'s"",L y7,.F^. ; . ,Fr _ ^F75 7 �4„..s�`,, Ct ... _ Y Y western Al A wireless •� •4.Ni, • %. 'Si.' _ 4 _ • pl to .S�t . . , au, 'iir,......, ....., • • Nr I 1."--- ‘ 1 �.� - _ - .� 4-' .guawr : _. i C t . ..._...„. . 1 1I _ lip" b Aw 1. _y rR �: EXISTING • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • _ :-.- SI-IURGUARL ' : .� �4. �.. .,`. �, STORAGE • • I. • ,,_ me site #SE3-411 -A • • . r LOOKING SOUTH : > PROPOSED 4,1,:.,,,7_,.,,,,,,.4,7ww, ,,,,,.,2....,...„4.:74,-i.i._•-e.-_-„,.....;„_,T.v.4- ,- ....,:',..,,-_,...:2..."Al:,0,4.-,"-','.•;172.4.:'''..„.„,..-4-P. 4';.44f:1,..),..'7,:li'?1"4",•-•.•?4 — .• 4.r...110,6-"is'fit.i...74:•:75.":^}":;:;.77".4 -4,-.1.47•4';'-'14 .1:,..: -71Ai:7-'1'3:. *'1/4475'....- 7' ''''''''".‘4."':64:!#,.114'7'''''711:,,,.. li'''''''.4'. ,,. i • * , Y4-v7A,,, - V-..• '-' '-,i'I_ , _ . • __ , _ , __ ,_ . I I western , .. . . . . . _ ... I I 1 wireless ., PO.r:1 Sa#1414a0/4„ . , I -0. .. .,.• - ...NrAr- ..... ,iitt- :•,..45.•-.. • •. ., _ . ,t1..0.teity,.'7.15 .f..?„-,. . Ills,.......• .16 ... )..• .a i 4 ....4%-s-. , . .4 441.-.:1(A..." ..-. • ..:.. ••.-_-4 " 1/41,-;t. 411'' , '''''' "Vie • $7.;1. . W.T:- '"N4.. '144,,,, SAL-:. ' ti.ltrii:• 11,'",,,.% ' - .,,_411:4•sk, . • '. 1F* 1 - . A., ..,:, • • 1.3:4 II •• ,• , ALT., IIF akt,,..,' •.! ' • 0 T _-• .-..... ._ ty,. .c.,„ .14, „ _ , , • 0 '-' - * - •-.' • ...--. . • . '. ..•-• . •• ... k .• • ...„... 4 ,i.‘0,.. _,• ...t. 1 —ic, • • i•. • k .- •-,,x':,k,,; ,. t .0"‘ ' 7--'. -*'i. . '44`,•' Ur.-..*- „,..,,'A',- ' • : ' :,, liw• ... . E It 14 + 4114161211111. Fill] IN ,....... r tist•• ' • ,. 4 . 1 r111113r31.1: .1 J.. t ' .-•:.:4 ' . ' .. ' .• ../ ... , •. „),4 . ' .. '4.. ' - ' • . SI .41 i _.. ...• 4 t. - . . EXISTING . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4 ,4,, .. . ' . • • 'At 1•1' ti4,-: •.'4, • 4 • + •:* ' . •1.17951951L' .S qi t • L. ...L. ' . SHURGUARD • • 104‘ • 111 •: . •• • _ • STORAGE • • lin . ii„...._,„ ,,. . e% - '• • *011;ir , 1 ,. site fiSE3 -411 -A • • ..... - : . • ,.. EQUIPMENT VIEW • • . • , PROPOSFD . . <;:S' r-.^a \J`--;nw RPZ ,� ��- ' r.7,7 r'�'Y'°'' .%.,,, •�'a� • -r•7 t..- - z.ii•c,;:, pis ye2;ur,�1'+r.�` `'�r xr ,,��•'k d S .�':Y�);�'�' "'�•`$,�,�sJ" ,,r,y�,% na, c7c"�i'i?�•�5 q°ni"�?S SY{,sf,.�..,o'E,a�i�Y... �''�". "�x9�n'ks' J`S.�' v" �,,«••t'�iq`�q!a"� c r ���{'° c+xP�j 't.,;_, ,t4 1>•1,:'` yfa j`..$•• ;&•74- ,m'r�t.>:uttbZ4.•x ..r.. C - e, 3, < s r': 't N k rr• ., .,n '4's•,'t. _ . .«''''r '' ''` �:; tt:� t.[''''4k cu.;'w -3 t er• K.-.4,•` ,.°�j. 'G",,,.3,{P•�J" p'rY. .�'`�+��.�•�^ p(�?q��a�P i, •{y�' $� �+.�^- _ ..:'��.:Z:�..tct..z,:..:.:5�°- ��a>,) 3 _,)'vA-'iA 47,_.�/�; *c g wsx; ;a +'3 fa„ { �i5; r7'xY..,,t �r��3 ..a, - ���`'}3:`x i ' �v ;tesx• 40,.. rr,r,�.Yps .5,(,P "'x"``�c — t 5 �` Cu '19i5`MSi'rl "}i �T f�iy ,�. S:at�^ 'b".• '•F,t r-,,-it 3#,t 9 ,... Has .SA�as, tik., .:- ..r �. .,�-: M1�4l' laF,Nr �•✓;4�£y5�.��,.�f(d' p,'�(ruC�. ���. •.LN�S ,[.3.f,�'{L ����t A:i []]PYY �,yy.11.tbm.,SF„�x y K' ' S _ Y,P. • Lk; f4 L a ,�? ;,; LII ';yekk,v-4.•'" y. R.`.! '¢�. �,rr£ a'Itn �` \ 1 i0p',��,f!^y+ °+�, CD .F,t' tt'";"� •+`1r''�"h: �� cA4vynF; F"1Z r t ISM '} .tF web ' ' A$•`J'l':� �' afY '4'"' phk` '� S " r.h11.••• ,t4044 9.kg,�f 1.T•(- : �$k:�c,r1'e,, ?` _ SS"{lit F'"`'x,tC{4�Y+.rt}a,�}a a. 'S �.,ttr P:.w. ? ._ ti':Y' ilpi 4,8100 CA ""S���"�;i":k' >,t ''.L §,.;' 1.�''.4,"N'''�u' .,.r'�yj.;K �:-. :c i r' p;ip; �t;i '., F'°n: 0 1 ';-,4 a 1.?::E',t. ,,tat):, ', , , ,..a.,�'i",a',- : i t,,,,1,00 x�.. a,;:}� ,,,,,,p�i-s •mIM � ,,�`y..,.•„1:�, x"T;v¢� ' ,Y.,; _ . �J ar�s„��s�.+'}j�' NA - ;; +;,,.'1•fa'�Y.�a ' .t''�,��`�[A�f - ,'ra'�'j.'j"''Q'V,kt 4.'VT. �- _ _____ __—. i �.FM1V.r�. !,, ��;,(t_„ d4 't�iT R''�,j�t„,(�,'3,." i ~r`•,iitr L'„•`n• v •'Yx, 4- V.• , •! "m' j r,,`s•'P,'. �t.t� {r �ix`j��,`�Ar �rsn • ( 9 '.'. t:.F ,. M1/f.�i'Y'f i'�i,'��i`�e.-. 7r, x '� ' i:".'f .,r?,.r1 sy'X�ti/n'+;,j'°°'�";}':' — }},,'�,.-- tb..7.."sa;•'..;%uy';:,,,x. 'p^"'rI ,'. �4„y (),��.y:r��'j} 1,40y q-j,i fug, y�f h.•+S+'A,�',.r ,J44,,r •�` �.I A. ry;,.-4 -j 4P4 r^41Nk7:a,!.F. .7c`•F"40,:,6•,, r,�,,'-m; $y`v mf.r' e't. 'l�r,5�!!:(C��.%,_.',' .X I �gyKs�z aL'3:4:FF y y b. F}},'* "JS.,.4•':r P ' Fy�(1.5•{,.{` ;vSar1 aRLI-- ,..',:f1•?•,''A 4' ^ :'1?h�;i"'' +*I;0 �r,xlki p'&' ''r4r,-�i•F.P 'fu �Si">`-'+r EP^F'CC •.•;t �"' WS,. ��{r,:`islt 3 k>d"� 2 4�t.'/w'�rd�:,'c dui'b° r^` t - - - `'i 1� r`Z'po.. 'yti r•,E.. ,. ].7 Yw ,'Yta , A .."yaMLa �ea,410.z.,,.,)!,'4 lr plk� •-.. .l u' +?,sr, Fr' <t&'�;,'-'T t-' - ?41, ,�Asa ,,g f` `S.YGT...�t' '✓p•'✓�'y s • , r�., $44).A y�7•`f. `�'` Jf`,id ^444e�yy _ . �'r:! {',M1,t,'1 >° .`1 .�C A.''1 ' {l �ks:9'F„t'0 /. Is 1,4;. Y,a'.a A'r Lv*�i:„ �M1M1�e'C�r 'c �?r h �, :°5t" r" 6 �r, 'tb nt6 .i #x rk '�-• �1 ,i,..h y & tgk9 Y:a�Y .t-31;4:7-4: L .-I IlL e• �_ 1 'Jy;; ti � �' l � ,Yr � �dW „c h+.• � Y U`,d ', , i,�,,, ,,,. J S�,p,,,,,rt F F` ��� s;f ▪4 ,,'klN", G:jsE� y_ ' 7 . h i Y { 1 ,, A4 T rA ' "? .• u ur a . 1:''�t: i1 A. c.,, v k +�;.' ,`S; ° ''['«.K•• f.,,k lire ray',A.2„c,;-•4•,.,."4 S''•^,),,,, Z 4>Nr ', - r1, y., nw7;' `A?:„>h,a�,,"+geY�`,�l"j�R'�'r }17;3,z.''}� �r.^,+r��'{y `v t .',]�� '-' A ill_ di' d° •U",l ,14, �i•^YA•i T��3'�4+aq` rSr�i Tl..Ii' OIN_O ` t+ 4• ,ti 1, "i �.` ,,,� ., Y 1 A \ �1",4.5.�:Td'" S.e , ;.;,y,,, iF"' t. t'�7 ' f s i.uY ,:r"a x"s'r: ^' J=' �ii i ;ice Sr t,*1 r�.k 1> , 25 4,' �.4, f' '•:`r y.;�.,.,,='i'•'' _ .,,,:..r.,� �!C:*?s� �j 'i �''rJ•�" fC:.�r �:r � ti V ,{,,r+::' 'S�� ti r.e tx.�';-it'r ,�.;t , I :;3 %.,TW t° $a:,t t..... rY£a3:,,, VA.:" ,...::14,7E:pas' a SR r k», btu�'v uc., a N (,}•`�y qa... �p� 1 ` 19h''', _,, �$ 4„q'+ :' ••,, 1 Si."I�y A 1'.,',„e, ate. .`'pL`E,A1 -„,„1C,i,.t"r,.'.•e.4 •'.:i,1 4 ,4•13.t .' • r ;* .tl" F . '`rR"••'r,+! yg. d"':', • 1'1. r3 •�'ra "¢� ! �;tt:�•,, ^r,'�v�' rT.iY�t 7y!�r �,:�5�jjc.;� rr�,',j�'}' 1 �'�',s• ;�r;J t 3A�7�, ,'`' w t �'� •. p(,v Cl' �Q▪ pt' a '`� :,s+. 4t r:� d`it �:>ti:G -,�'^Y;:x }'r.N.w < +xt' t�:. t... S • 1, �^. ,��'' '�, r... : 4, �h.( .•a."\49•' igh,VAa:,H�,���F�'p1=•' tt�:t��}''Ia:f .,ZY.Y e M£: ,'=.Y ,.., -a (f..•+'r*',,, e-,li*•3.'F.�,'r t'� 'P A„.'.'<� '.fa:,,,ir, t,i:;1. a +:0.7;04.c.4 fi_r{.� k�c,,� . :":': ;`' )'`,..r t 'W.; '+,`'i'?p''''� -� , . 1 440;%�?.as'j} '.,'i,,j 'rt° #'aAv• r•td' ,A' . f d'.,1..44 'i_' 3y�"V.it's 1f, r ; �`df ,•,t'u' , ^-17 c , At q 'F, .gr*,��r ?.` a+`-`.'r -.11,s 'IF. lo , A 7 0,;`, ,fr': ,N,,b1* „ ---,iYA...'''. .„,,,..i.tp. ).‘,4! "., • I ? s9�,?� .• err_ I - `s�'*,"'*�y` ,:r .00.74r:' , 'Fe 7r-k,,J �'., r d "y H.3, 1"p,, .a,r �� '`''i nv `�-- a.Y t'Y" r'T . 4u '^X. Yyy `n4M1Vi44 5` k4 t^AVi "'- d ',t'. ♦.V ^i, .r py � t ••t 't .J ,e t „ .. "-'K".:r.•Y , .F`• =1•. �':.: .:Tr. µ,,..,,,,✓,. r..w� V., 't' ^J'., ,:fi "{--,_ 11 F„i', ylyai, ip''dr ^-{�, 11-t dK�(.tk,,--Ag-.,krr+1, ��ra •.eit:f (1 a? r i:° ti +-4: =.x y •;a4—i*9,^ 'yw«-.�. :2c. �4. x-- .4.,,., . ',": g �. .4. �� .v,t,"t'�F� r. '^t•;;tr � ��'_ r .�. ,t`v =;;;z �;'�"?� r :#.s _�'x".r .:et`��•'ir: ���.r�`;�'3,'3+ �.�, .'��''."`��,;�, '+•;?.rJ.:�$xex;r, rw,'r • :a"�� �1 � c, .ay",.ta' {,�.,�',;.^ �.. �, .�t.i.-, ,.Ft`y��,''d� �>i:- '3S.X;,M.. Gi�;• s.C,'ti,.. n:.kr`.,G'x,�' ..,'L� ./�,T.!`� �.,'�,, F •.A S?%`R r,c4,,,j'�&, y' � Vi :.c dery ..e rtiY" •A" :'L!, , - ,vi,;.,+-F. ;_ , ,F,t-t,. ,'3?•.9n, #v ,:, ,-4p --1.-ve'.:..n r.f'. -4--;. -.r.1n ,Xq S�$�`s�1:':��a_'� f �.,k +St�V.'u4"`..rs>ku}":��.Is.•r`«r:`.,� a:s4°""xif3'h`.{_tVa�+7.ctr�`. �^•,wr� .zyti"�'7�.ht ����`h�;Gt�u's"���s-.r,,.��� -�. . i'�'::'�•8,{`+. �•,'y's-�". �: �1 •s. '.�;': 4,a„r��,r��a 'ia,wn .,'<.,azl't,'S`]e.uc 3 -::tEis:_ .'.�t::,�_c..>_��:1ufik'Se.Y_rl. c":,�v'��hl�srr_u'tx.•...s':�.k��:,S'1�'"S'.Y=..aS': western® wireless September 4, 1997 Jennifer Henning ,'t City of Renton,Planning Division 5 19 200 Mill Avenue South cl��E�E , 97 Renton, WA 98055 O R o�NING Re: Request for additional photo-simulations, LUA-97-092 (SE 3411-A) Dear Ms. Henning: This letter is in response to your request for additional photo-simulations taken from the following locations looking toward the site: 1. Looking west from 111th Place SE 2. Looking southwest from 112t Ave. SE 3. Looking south from I-405 near the north city limits 4. Looking east from Ripley Lane The enclose photo-simulations were done in best angle possible looking toward the site from the map provided by you. Should you have any questions regarding these photos,please feel free to contact me at 864-0580. Sincerely, Sammantha Kang Z_ Western Wireless Western Wireless Corporation 330 120th Avenue NE,#110 Bellevue,WA 98005 FAX (206) 451-4739 FAX(206) 451-7987 Lo /• 5'086 Poi u % s 0(2, .' ' L_7 �' _ �,• wL � _ 7A . - 4 0 �� 4--"iptc(10-7P ro--214- art = ® ??4/'Y !"'"d'v2/rl-4Mp -07141' 411/71-4/1 Goo CZa ,y - - - C4 ' :7 &2 .'/}7V1, .);APie ,°7 :P11/7/ 111/, .' - #7 -71,,e042/32‘-,4 --- ---- - - ---- - - - --- 7i/ 4/0-1.wr - DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON - 6,1/ 2'ivr14?rit 4'76 SEp 0 B 1997 ECE1VED Seelig Family Properties Seelig Family Properties September 5, 1995 Jennifer Toth Henning Project Manager Dev. Serv. Div. RECEIVED City of Renton fax: 277-4455 SEP 0 5 199 Re: LUA-97-092CU-A DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RCNTON Dear Ms. Henning: We own the adjacent property to the east of the subject property, and we wish to file an objection to the above referenced application. Specific areas of objection are identified in the following letter. The record should show that our property is not intended to be permanently undeveloped and we request that this fact be recognized. Especially considering pending highly desirable development on the opposite side of I-405, our property has considerable potential for us as well as the City of Renton. If the adjacent owners had been less hasty they probably would be thinking of development different from warehouses at this time. We have expended substantial money for architectural and engineering studies in anticipation of development of our property and recently had preconstruction conferences with Renton Officials. There are 15 separate antennas now installed, and 3 more approved with installation pending. We wish to refer to Planning Policies of Renton which recognize the unsightly nature of utilities such as the subject antennas. These Policies contain intelligent measures to accomplish a reasonable and equitable resolution for the aesthetic detriments associated with achieving a functional utility and the adverse effects on adjacent properties. From the "City of Renton Utilities Element' (attached) "The Utilities Element defines how to minimize the detrimental impacts of utility improvements on surrounding development." The policies of the Utilities Element should apply to the subject situation, and to our property as surrounding development, since our development is pending. "It(the Utilities Element) asks that the costs of improvement should be distributed in an equitable manner." Our property is already bearing at least its fair share of the cost burden because of existing antennas and their devaluing effect on our property. Adding still more unsightly antennas would go far beyond an equitable distribution of costs. The Phone Company can surely find alternative sites, although their costs may increase. But it is not equitable for us to bear the cost of devaluing our property again and again every time some phone company wants a cheap antenna site, in disregard of Renton policy. Objective U-A Phone: 206-454-0885 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1925 Street Address: 1309 114th SE, Suite 107 Fax: 206-451-8203 Bellevue, WA Bellevue, WA 98009 98009 Seelig Family Properties e r "Provide an adequate level of utilities consistent with land use." There are already enough antennas on the roof to meet the standard of adequacy. More are not needed to meet the standard of adequacy. Policy U-5 "Encourage the appropriate siting of all utility systems in a manner that reasonably minimizes impacts on adjacent land use." A few antennas here and there are "lost in the shuffle." Concentrations of antennas, such as on the subject roof, change the character of the appearance of the building. No other nearby building has a concentration of antennas like the subject warehouse at the present time, and the pending proposal would substantially add to the number of antennas. Approval for installation of more antennas as proposed would not reasonably minimize the impacts, consistent with Renton policy. Creating a building roofline profile that looks like an antenna utility station does not minimize the impact of antennas. "Discussion" (at the end of Utilities Element) "Policies are designed to insure that utility services are constructed in a manner which reasonably mitigates the impacts on adjacent land uses." This places additional emphasis on U-5 (please see preceding). Policy 101 "Require that cellular communication structures and towers be sensitively sited and designed to diminish impacts and collocated on existing towers and structures wherever possible and practical." The existing number of antennas has already changed the character of the warehouses. Conventional warehouses do not have the number of antennas that exist at this time, nor do conventional buildings nearby. More antennas would only make the warehouses look very much more strange. There is no way that making the warehouses look like antenna bases, as they do, could be consistent with the requirement for sensitive siting. Collocated antennas have not been proposed. We hereby request that the proposal to install more antennas (LUA-97-092CU-A)be denied. We will provide additional information if a hearing is scheduled. Respectfully Submitted, HOWARD L. SEELIG MARTIN A. SEELIG © CITY OF RENTON _,,,,--_,IL� ..___ -- Planning/Building/Public Works a' .z ' ,,� +� �'" ��"� ^'0 Mill Avenue South - Renton,Washington 98055 r *r� v.._ _��� . _ • , �. ^s y i , .4 viz_ Togo . "' ,.' O314 u,S. POSTAGE It • • /J .e ,B ' r ¶'�r �.)� .c." 334330 0800 � :: so°j icd D'vtj{tc_ -_ �, _ T G�(`; C " ��� ' J CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INS `` ...t::.y �` r \ �e J% L �. C P s f C,-� 1 ; 5520 Lbj Fwy #430 1,";' Dallas TX 75240 � -W- 34gara_ %41 iais. .C).S.* vt) - NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS , DATE: July 31, 1997 A9 Environmental Checklist Review(ECF)and Administrative Conditional Use Permit(CU-A)Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. IOJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-97-092,ECF,CU-A/WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD DESCRIPTION: Applicant proposes to install an 85 foot high telecommunications monopole mounted with a total of 12 panel antennas. Four,30-inch by 30-inch by 6-foot high equipment cabinets would be located near the monopole..Project requires environmental review and administrative conditional use permit. GENERAL LOCATION: 1755 NE 48th Street STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: ' Project Application File,Photosimulations PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Administrative Conditional Use permit Building Permit Comments on the above application must be submitted:in writing to Jennifer Toth Henning, Project Manager, Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South;Renton,WA .98055,by 5:00 PM on September 8,1997. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of,record and receive additional notification by mail, ' contact Jennifer Toth Henning, at 277-6186. Anyone who submits written:comments will automatically become a party of record,and will be notified of any decision on this project.': ' PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: July 3,1997 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 29,1997 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: July 31,1997 ill 1- t CORPORATE 11 r' . u1 3 !x D I ee? / �. fl --i63 a / m o0 r J / rr sPos296, 121 1 8 1]1 „— a sriezoez , �} ° SF�Gt .5E 121 3. / x II H E 1"11 J LY r 1B5 . 1 167 gnt a . .. ;i[. • 1. _ S'sr, b°66s . 1!-'- EN1 O ' r - ..:[',, " ;,.,,• ,s ..... . r 184. ; _ 2.183' !y:;0 r__•± �li . .`... y' 1 • GENMALOT.DOC 1�1 4°�? sr mi-er g d -- ---- Ll:- 1. `' Tf•....,`, CIT'l -,3F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • • August 22, 1997 Mr. Kirk Vinish Western Wireless • 330 120th Avenue NE,#110 • Bellevue, WA 98005 - VIA:; Facsimile and US Mail Subject: Western Wireless at Shurgard (LUA-97-092,CU-A) Dear Mr.Vinish: The Environmental Review Committee(ERC) discussed your proposal at its regular meeting on August 19,1997. The.ERC has requested additional information in order to determine the aesthetic impacts of the proposal on the surrounding community. Four additional photo-simulations should be submitted, .generally taken from the following locations looking toward the site; • 1: Looking west from111th Place SE .= 2::` Looking southwest from 112th Avenue SE 3. Looking south from 1-405 near the'noith city limits' - -. ". • 4. . :.. Looking east from Ripley Lane:, A map is attached which indicates the general locations that the photos should be taken from. Once this information is received your application will be rescheduled with the ERC. Until that time,the application will be placed on hold. . Should you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please feel free to contact me at(425) 277-6186. Sincerely, i,-•r. f(14r {� vt, n ifer . - Henning . Project Manager cc: File • • • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - GS Thic nanwr rnnfainc Rfl%rarvrIwd mntnrial 90%nnct rnncumwr CITY OF J 3 SE 64th St. • 4 " _s.5 ., y1s( f 3# 93 1 SE 65th ZONII i c i; f 1 Z :, fitI i SJ W 2 ak tV:'ti'"" s F ._. -Vw] tt __. "' F 1 i C].f! ' ` ¢ RC Resource E . W i # i n Resident .t1 i 1 ,~, ii rf.;\ R-5 Resident : F f e' Sl+i 1. FF . — _.. t.` R 0 Resident -'' f SE 68th St. s1: . mf € i __ ... ..^`... "•• RMH Resident 1 i i-• .....E : i i _ r r ., �{ € 4. R t0 Resident 1 .....-• `i 'F r .0 ... : R-1a esrdenl g £ R . t t£ RH-t j Resident 3 . ..... .... ..... ..... • i} ! —7r t t 3 s RM-N Resident i 2 i 3 e) r .,.. ..... • °- i = d c RH-C Residen' r-- — r. ,;N -U Residen y u FRH a I. ... ......` i f \ — C onvenl s F ... t .....Y.....,.._.„......., ,.,,,,..,,. w...,,„,.,_,,,,, CN enter : 1 �� C SE 72nd St i R? Cs Center "-' "' "" '-" t- - f• s i CD Center r ; F � : 3 .... ... .... .... ..... / ... `. R'�• p CDR enter fJ t Cl 7 enter f NE 50th F LcA f tt I i CO Comm( 1H Indust] I ; r C Ael f ai:IJ IH Indust: • ` le ' NE 48 t. ; d , IL Indust] SE 76th tSt. / ` , } ' # ..: co .; P-I Public i / .• v SE 76th PI` API Public] / ' g h Pl School ) Li / S 7 / ..< 77t ' --- Renton E: Pl, 0 �:. f w t 1 /V� _....gin A tr.) ,...�..._ �,..f d. !:. °�'VY °iR � LONG ] t AN I SE 80th St. r i '..40 \ -� 43th F l A NE it 5432 ---- IMO RECEIVED y y western® wireless August 18, 1997 AUG 'l 1997 Jennifer Henning Devauriv,L.ry, r City of Renton, Planning Division CITY OF RFNTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Request for additional information, LUA-97-092 (SE 3411 A) Dear Ms. Henning: This letter is in response to your voice mail request for information regarding our application for a wireless communication facility at Shurgard. According to Candice Boyd, RF Engineering Manager for Washington, the base elevation of the monopole is 36-feet. I am also sending to you today a photo east of the Shurgard site,please let me know if a photo simulation from this site would be sufficient. Sincerely, Kirk Vinish, AICP Senior Zoning Analyst Western Wireless Corporation 330 120th Avenue NE,#110 Bellevue,WA 98005 FAX(206) 451-4739 FAX(206) 451-7987 I ` I ' western® 5August, 1997 � A � wireless Development Services Division City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 VIA HAND DELIVERY RE: Pre-application Meeting Request Western Wireless PCS Site, SE-2505-C APN: 0423059186 3410 NE 12th Street I Dear Planner: Western Wireless submits the attached information for a pre-application meeting to allow the construction of a Personal Communications Service (PCS)facility to be at the City of Renton Water Tower, 3410 NE 12`h Street. Western proposes to install PCS antennas to the handrail of the tank and ground-mounted support equipment on the same property. A total of nine (9) PCS antennas are planned to be mounted on the support structure. The ground mounted radio support equipment consist of one large file cabinet-style unit approximately 90"Lx32"Wx52"H and one power pedestal approximately 36"Lx36"Wx48"H and will be located approximately sixty feet(60')south of the water tower. Greater detail of the equipment can be reviewed in the attached site plan. The location of this site is ideal because the topography allows digital wireless coverage for the surrounding residential and commercial uses, including the NE Sunset Blvd. corridor. Additionally, extensive ground cover in the form of existing structures, trees, shrubs, and mature tree growth on the perimeter of the grounds make this an ideal wireless communications location. Views from adjoining land uses would be minimally obstructed, if at all. Western has no plans to remove any existing vegetation. Should you have any questions or require additional information, do not hesitate to call me at 206.864.0576 or 425.451.8578. Sincerely, Scott R. Steiding Zoning Specialist enclosures Western Wireless Corporation 3301 sous Avenue NE,#110 Bellevue,WA 98005 FAX(206) 451-4739 FAX(206) 451-7987 alga:;>:::<:>::>: ::::::::::::::::>:::<;::::>::>:::::;:::<:>::::<:::>:::>:::;;<.;: MENT: ERV1C S.. ....... (. NEST.LIST :OFSURROUNDING PR4 ... PERT W • b ect:site::: <>:<:>:::<::::<:::::>::;::::>:::::::» <>:»<::<:>:<:>s :<:<::::>:::<:::>:>::>::<:>:<: PROJECT NAME: l/"Ps ('4/ G./t'oe- ` {s-S ! 3 1,.v f` A r , APPLICATION NO: •LUA °11 ' 092. ECF1 GV "A The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • 1.3 / ' 6, • RECr a ' • DES LAP, r Cill� �r f3ENTOh` � c`�(Attach additional sheets,,if necessarry), , t a (Continued) 1 NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL - NUMBER 30.11 1/I` Applicant Certification I, ei it iC " #41' S "'w' , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: City of Renton Technical Services Records c�P%�. `, 1 Ed' Title Company Records :'�6_ 0 King County Assessors Records ; «� _ ��0�ro Q / / . 0 ..,�, ' Signed - U»� �r 9 Date - 7 - 7 v� P.' `� (Applicant) Oj. NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn befog me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, ' residing at I to `/2 S SE .j 5/55''���� on the 2- day of , 19 S 7. I 1 Signed c2-' - e--7- c2'6 MARILYN KAMCHEFF (Notary Public) r ................................................. G:. >:::::: i<'' CCERTI FICAT ION`..OE:'11IIAILN ��� �`>�>��>> >"> >��>'>`»�>> <'<`<':�`>� >`1<'>'»' ��< <`_<. .':iii.J. 41'6:iiikiii.451 'k...:....:..:.:...:: :YfY fis'.:..::..;:t4 o the proposed applrcation were.;ma�led to iiggii ea h::>listed; ro �a.< 3�. ."� ::::.:.::::::.:.::::::::::: :::.::: : ::: ::: :::.:::::.:::::: .:. '''"IIMR"taitike. COY"... ..............:.Date................... - :i:!:ii}}}i'•:�'�i}ii:•isi.::.is.i:.i :.ii::.:.::.:'::::: ::.:.::: }i:4::8i::i':ii:: .:v;.ii::[.::.y:::.i•..:"r::.:i'::.:::: :iiiiii:(! ii:•iii})iii?:i.i::v:::.:•::•:::�iii:ry}i:iii:=i^i ii?}ii}ii :i!i::;;n;::;•i}ii}iiii:4:4i: �/ ...:::::.1...: :.:::::::::::::.iall.�:.:::.:• ::. .:. :.:::::.:::::::. :..... ::::::.::�:::::::::::.....: ..::!!!!:: ::.:::$EZE::::::::::::::::.:::::::::: .:::::::i �:: :::i'�:i:'i::.i�iii:':::i:::� ii:.:: ::::iiiiiiiii;:i`:�?:i.�i::iSi;Y,.ji:+iij:; :; :':::i:. ' '' 114' ri.. � ..Sub ri n :� sc bed a d..swor.n<: f r be o e.me ::: ...................................:.. ...:::. ................. .................................. .. . . . . a. ota .;:::P...ublic':::.in::'.an ::;for>: h..,: :.:::"'::i': :::.:::.:::.:...:::.;:.<:.:::.<, :: :<: ;. :.;:.; :. :.:.:.i..;::...::.::;;.::.i::;.;:.:..:.:::.::.i::::. d.:.:...::.:t.::e.;State,iof,:Wash)ngton;.�':.;;ii: . e� Jl .> ��:. •.:: ... :.....::.::.>:..;`::'::.::::" :' .>. .. ::;;::::::;i:::i::::ii::i::i::::::>::.::.::.::.>:.::::.s.>s:.>:;.>:;.::.>:.»:>:.:::::;.>:.>:.>:_>:.::_>::::::;:::i::is�::is �::i:>::::::::q:;;:::::.';:i:::.';:r:::.::::5:::: • listprop:doc REV 07/95 MARILYN KAMCHEFF 2 COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29199 Parcel Number Owner .. me Site Addr,_ 2-g Phone 33I4330 0800 CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL 7900 110TH AVE SE 334330 0820 SEELIG MARTIN A 108TH SE 334330 0842 HUSON JUNE OLIVE & HO 11030 SE 76TH ST 334330 0843 HAL REALTY V INC 1900 NE 48TH ST 334330 1100 KIEWIT CONSTRUCTION C '7580 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD 334330 1105 MAY CREEK ASSOC *NO SITE ADDRESS* 314330 1120 HOLDINGS CAMPBELL 7710 LAKE WASH BLVD SE 334330 1120 HOLDINGS CAMPBELL 7710 LAKE WASH BLVD SE 334330 1120 HOLDINGS CAMPBELL 7710 LAKE WASH BLVD SE 334330 1125 IDS & SHURGARD INCOME 1755 NE 48TH ST 334330 1125 IDS & SHURGARD INCOME 1755 NE 48TH ST 334330 1125 IDS & SHURGARD INCOME 1755 NE 48TH ST 334330 1125 IDS & SHURGARD INCOME 1755 NE 48TH ST 334330 1140 DEITCH MICHAEL J 1800 NE 44TH ST 641-1327 334330 1150 KAO MING-TSONG *NO SITE ADDRESS* 885-3437 334330 1180 DENNY S REALTY INC 4750 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD t.. The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 334330 0800 334330 0820 334330 0842 CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INS Martin Seelig June Olive Huson 5520 Lbj Fwy #430 PO Box 1925 11030 SE 76th St Dallas TX 75240 Bellevue WA 98009 Newcastle WA 98056 3,34330 0843 334330 1100 334330 1105 HAL REALTY V INC KIEWIT CONSTRUCTION CO R MAY CREEK ASSOC ' 2125 Western Ave #300 1000 Kiewi,,t Plz PO Box 1129 Seattle WA 98121 Omaha NE 68131 Bellevue WA 98009 334330 1120 334330 1120 33433.0 1120 Campbell Holdings Campbell Holdings Campbell Holdings 1800 E Imperial Hwy #120 1800 E Imperial Hwy #120 1800 E Imperial Hwy #120 Brea CA 92821 Brea CA 92821 Brea CA 92821 334330 1125 334330 1125 334330 1125 IDS & SHURGARD INCOME GR IDS & SHURGARD INCOME GR IDS & SHURGARD INCOME GR 1201 3rd Ave #2200 1201 3rd Ave #2200 1201 3rd Ave #2200 Seattle WA 98101 Seattle WA 98101 Seattle WA 98101 33,4330 1125 334330 1140 334330 1150 IDS & SHURGARD INCOME GR Michael Deitch Ming-Tsong Kao 1201 3rd Ave #2200 4126 187th Ave SE 16131 NE 42nd Ct Seattle WA 98101 Issaquah WA 98027 Redmond WA 98052 334330 1180 DENNY S REALTY INC 293 E Main St _ Spartanburg SC 29302 US'VY O� ,, �® NOTICE OF APPLICATION. 4 PLANNING/BUILDINGIPUBLIC WORKS ' DATE: July 31,1997 An Environmental Checklist Review(ECF)and Administrative Conditional Use Permit(CU-A)Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-97-092,ECF,CU-A/WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD DESCRIPTION: Applicant proposes to install an 85 foot high telecommunications monopole . mounted with a total of 12 panel antennas.Four,30-Inch by 30-inch by 8-foot high equipment cabinets would be located near the monopole.Project requires environmental review and administrative conditional use permit. ' GENERAL LOCATION: 1755 NE 49th Street - STUDIES REQUIRED/OR _ AVAILABLE: Project Application File,Pholosimulatlons PUBUC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Administrative Conditional Use permit ' Building Permit Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Jennifer Toth Henning, Project Manager, • Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on September 8,1997.If you • have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact Jennifer Toth Henning,at 277.8188.Anyone who submits wdtlen comments will automatically become a party . of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. • !PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I 1 . DATE OF APPUCATION: July 3,1997 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPUCATION: July 29,1997 , DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: July 31,1907 - r',/• /A/ i..!':_:',.,1, 13 i • // _,0 Aar'*tree+ ,SE , 14 /{A. IN . /lai_ ..___ 167 d . • I IS1 "193 's'90,(•f4. " 2I .ii. 1 ._ . I A,\...,.,„q �uGEm5L0T.D0C •�[�'V•�` CERTIFICATION tt V E/V/ilfir • _�Nfv& . hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by me in conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . �l ti 31r / 77� • Igned: ±a& [1(0/144,(7,/ • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS . COUNTY OF KING ) • certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Jen/AO FED 7 1.�•` ��t A/ - signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluift ct.ldr(tl •uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. . :f,l,l •�• ..)%1;:p R tit Dated: !! t'C-7 y�.w , , • " Notary Po 1i in and f r the Stat- ,of vvafstlfi6lrin• Notary (Print) MARGARET'J:•i W-LAR . My appointment exp ISSlON EXPI Res 619 e NO TAR Y.00C 1 1 _ OS�Y ob+ IR + . ' �N'NTO • 1 NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS. DATE: July 31, 1997 1 An Environmental Checklist Review(ECF)and Administrative Conditional Use Permit(CU-A)Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. j . PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-97-092,ECF,CU-A/WESTERN WIRELESS AT SHURGARD DESCRIPTION: Applicant proposes to install an 85 foot high telecommunications monopole mounted with a total of 12 panel antennas. Four,30-inch by 30-inch by 6-foot high equipment cabinets would be located near the monopole. Project requires environmental review and administrative conditional use permit. GENERAL LOCATION: 1755 NE 48th Street STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: Project Application File,Photosimulations • PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Administrative Conditional Use permit Building Permit Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jennifer Toth Henning, Project Manager, Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on September 8,1997. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, ' 'contact Jennifer Toth Henning, at 277-6186. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: July 3,1997 I NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 29,1997 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: July 31,1997 • CORPORATE CI '.:‘ III 4; 1 i - ,• it / ,p4' `4 i '%:,.,, il • / 4/ 11 i ;; .... --163 / W 12) P! 1 P•SO5x Be,• % ! JI sriezoex I5, �Flrrc SE / t' III uy I � / J I ti T.-HV 4 _ 185__.- ! 167 ;I���J.L<y • •"e05069 1' U •t 1 RRENTON __ m. 5 • 1 184 ; 183 liUCt:' -••• � • -6/166 t] 165 ,5) u GENMALOT.DOC / • i �4( ? e.ai•m,x) ��,-'n 'C i ;y CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 28, 1997 Mr. Kirk Vinish Western Wireless 330- 120th Avenue NE, Suite#110 Bellevue, WA 98005 SUBJECT: Western Wireless at Shurgard Project No. LUA-97-092,ECF,CU-A Dear Mr. Vinish: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on August 19, 1997. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at 277-6186 , if you have any questions. Sincerely, , V�1 rY Jennifer Toth Henning Project Manager cc: Shurgard Storage/Property Owners I • ACCPTLTR.DOC r.�n - 0,1 ♦ - - - -- non:: ter, R A CITY OF VIEW-MN WPCS June 23, 1997 R F�a E I����� , ' JUL 2 1 1997 ' A Corporation Mr.Kirk Vinish BUILDING DIVISION Zoning Department Western Wireless r ,`=� {?r4 330 120th Ave.,NE Suite#110 ''° ' `' °'` Bellevue,WA 98005 -''"y _ _JUL \i97 1 Dear Mr. Vinish: E'U1LL1 f faNG D!V' 6 This letter addresses both tower height and co-location issues raised in reference to Western Wireless's'pr s to in Renton,Washington. The basic PCS design process is explained below to exemplify the impact of both tower height and co-location on our system design. This year Western Wireless acquired the E and F block PCS licenses for the Seattle Basic Trading Area(BTA)which operate at: 1885 to 1975 MHz. A hypothetical cell layout was developed by identifying demographic areas where we will have high demand for our PCS services. Search rings were then released for each site with RF engineering design parameters(i.e.height,type of antenna,ground elevation etc.). The radius of a cell is dependent on the required signal strength at the mobile and surrounding morphology. Also, worth noting is our frequency band(1900 MHz)being higher than cellular(800 MHz)has higher attenuation or loss, making the radius of our cell sites smaller. The morphology of the local area also affects the attenuation of our signal. For example,sites in heavy urban areas will be closer together due to building loss as opposed to sites in rural areas. The height of the antennae is critical in determining the radius of the cell. The higher the site,the greater the coverage radius. Western Wireless is looking to secure the Shurgard Storage site in Renton to insure overall coverage and call quality. The proposed site meets all of the Western Wireless engineering requirements. Western Wireless sent out a team of engineers to set up a test transmitter and to perform a drive test analysis on the site. This analysis measures signal strength to determine whether the site will provide the required level of coverage to insure system call quality. The results of the drive test indicate that the antennae need to be located at 100'above ground level(AGL)in order to maintain adequate signal strength. If the height is lowered below 100'high,an additional site will need to be constructed in the area to provide the same coverage as the 100'high antennas. It is Western Wireless'policy to design and to build towers that will support at least two carriers. Western Wireless can and will co-locate with other PCS and/or cellular carriers whenever possible.In the proposed area,however,no support structures exist which provide the mounting height necessary to achieve coverage of the proposed area. The preferred vertical separation between Western Wireless'antenna array and the other parties antenna structure is 20 feet. For example,if Western Wireless builds a monopole at 100 feet,one carrier could co-locate at 80 feet and another carrier could co-locate at 60 feet. Each co-location will be reviewed on a case by case basis because isolation requirements are dependent upon the type of antenna each carrier utilizes,the power output and frequencies,however, 20 feet assumes the worst case scenario. I hope I have been able to answer your questions in a satisfactory manner. Should you have further questions regarding these or any other issues, please feel free to call me at(425)451-3868. . rely, I •aul Cole Director of Engineering Western Wireless Corporation • WPCS Corporation 330 120th Avenue NE,#110 Bellevue,WA 98005 Fax(206)451-7987 - 2•, -• -....... • ••-,, ,..,, -,....-Aas...,,k:v.,t,, „-_,, ,,,,TAv.....A.,- - - • 4..c-rt..,:p-,,,i,, -,-,,..',41,`,....01-4,131's'a.,,,,.1.-:4:-.4.-::-A.V..!F4';':t..T,.,-k•;41,..A.,.,.4, .-., A --,,....v.Alif,. .. ,-.4.1.•,.,..,,fs,;,,e7,...-j-'''..-.;:.-Y'-;-.---;".44.;',..X•ti.;•..- :-..ittl•'. '-.-.-,,,-"A,-1.Z1',..",,t,.,44{,,...,,,,...--..N.... 1-1.4.2"41.1A:,..' . ")...' ''- ,,C,,,.. ..-L V..+4,-,:4 tl.9."A',V,V,r1,4 s.' '.', ...• *..,` ,, ''''' -,-.: t . c''''4.1,.‘•.4,:- .P...,‘.-., ..1,4P!,-,.e...,;,,, 4-,...1'4 ..1 ,.?.1.''f^.,..4.1:-.44.47.,"•r,1!._,A',-4.'4',-t41..„,,,v. .,,,V,7,1.1. 1.-4,".,:r.,cz,,..,.7, ;,..zji,...!..,..,..i.,,',I....if,.4,.'4,,,„..ty s,1,t-,'",>,% .".,3,:-,-,i,,,...,• , -,i4.-. -•,,'- ,C '',...4,11..,,t-''I' ''..y7 -!tt' ''''.,i". .--'..'.."';'',- "'tt - •' ' *'WI "r '-.. --*P.,-.44..* .'.,.-e,,,,‘*'e-..'" t"-,,..„*.r.,. - 4.41‘'-'''.."'''1:?'4,5.,e,'...7,7e,'',4.:•.,..,,v,„-,,,...;•.,,y, 4•••4z-f.k...q,',,,r, ,,,,,,..-t,.-,..-,..,,,;.,i,„;,,,-;,:N.,..„..,k.,,lAl A,i4F„,,,..e.,,-.41.4„4,,A.s--4:.4 '''r A-IRK:.,-4t.A..4,,,,•-- . - ,.,...- , t• ,w v ,.,..., ,• •?„, ,,,,. ••• ^4%.:',1 '4 ,;,inc,',"'-,-.41. • 4 ,- 1...• -X Vi-A,. •,-.1%..4-..-,.r.:: ,.z if -, r.,^,.,v-..., •••• , ),g%.---1. "Id•,.'V..',,, ,,,- -4,-,..4-..{1.". ,l' ...,..,,!...,-'''F.Wi,"'`,..,4-1.,.0, ‘-' - ... .!,-I,''.';‘"",''``'''''-"'.'." ''''-• '''''- ' '''. ''''''.' '''"''''' ' ' ''''"`* ''' '' ' ' ' ' ''' ' ,..,,,,,,k'1,,s'","'-'l,'It'''.'"S„,4wo,',2,,,'" .Aq't•'..-F.'".',,',0,.;.-.1-r, '40'.A.,.V.414..-1.5);.iap.'1",1,1 Y-..,.-k-..t%-'-.-11-<';.,,ft.,„.T.,.,-,,,A4 , v-.,: 4.7, ,- ).;,,...,-.*:91..,..,... `,......,*,77.. ...ii,T,.....', 1,,,,,,':i 1" "i, " ' I*4i lt ''',. ."-,-** ... 4.'' '-.'>,'., '..,- ''.,'r .i...' .".*j" , ." I I western o- ,:..., Al 1wireless , ..i . -1- - , ••..... ... .?...k f w.....„?•.,, --....-2- .,,-, -,...s, , 4-...-:,1,7.. -. .--ktr , -.4,-,.,,,,, 6,..--,- --:,• -.- :,. - "' v.' -..- ,,,:‘ . -'AV • .,,., .1..;.,. '''zial 2.., ,........ift:,:t. ..s.,;',v,.:7,0-,.V..-:,..f.!A",1•;:f ."*,,.1;**'*-r „.„...,...„...,..,.,..„...„„ ,...„-,,..„..„„..„..,....,,,...,..,-,_„.-,..kw,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,•,.„....„.74,,,,,..,„.„,.;,:,..... ._ ..,..„.5,.....t k,.•;: - ,-....,. .,„„T • _,... ..-,..54 'A-Vi14.11e.7., ' ..:.4..VV(Ity,:14,-4.i,,,, ...• -- 44 , 11A441..<- '''' .• '!;W'''.0,.. ',,& ',,', t -,!.; WOO,"1"..,,..7_, -.:"t.- ,...ill.?.%..:' -z:-lxpt,,,r-, -,q1,X5.1* -4'''''_ .4 '1,- .•-tt•.,-- At&---.:..... --' 4 f-44,-,..2._...- •_-.'..-./ .,.-eY.,c,. -,.'1,c•-• .z.-.., x .-- ' P4ea Segizdate44. .OA ..., ... .,.. :., ie. a ism IN 1. IIIII i'. -.; •,,t -s. .. .4- - ••:, •,••=. izilimmimmimps . t 1 ,...i. tom, f.5 •,..1....... :.,.: .-...... -- . 4-t•' li-4- -;•,.'' - ,.., ..... , - -., ,.._ Lr 4. - , iqt.: .., .... . . . . . . .. ,, .. r• ... ,.. • EXISTING • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . - - ..,. ..... ., ...,• • . . , • low— ___ _... .„. SHURGUARD • • • lit • . • • . • . . . . ..... • va, ........-..._------ . . , • STORAGE • • • • .11 ..., _ • site # sE3 .4 ii _A • • PROPOSED 11•111I16. TM ' S`fS'N1a* I' 'Yl^2`.T{e^� 'a"'T.'44 T 1 F I 1 1 western 1 Awir' eless I n`u ..r sy 'spy"a �. z- �� 1 r : 5 g � 1 z. q a ti � ' <,. a >'r sue: � o $uuuPat�c� ■ ■AK` '�'�-}..'i �a y ■ZL3- �+4 b"° 'hEY4,va �S4`■ } •'� .t ':•�, /.y' � :■.. ic- :4:, _ ,+,v*_:s - e38 ,,. ,t; .y-,..5, � # f xa..-t a-;b,..,:i'sr"d�a,r .". . ,x rFt'..5 Ilir ','. S L� A. •'&;;;;" t ■ •� ,�,. II �1■� . L a.3� i 4..... ‘.'4,..1 —.... ii 111 I -_ `, •{ •L a i.,i.,.1 .,. II ■. r. „. .I. EXISTING �: .• 111• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • �I� 111 • `.ks SHURGUARD . . I STORAGE iii1i. up • • site # SE3 -411 -A • . • • PROPnSFn. ... , ,n a:.. , • . yea .. ,. .►'" !.. :1.,:.... .° ..., .c. -r ; k 5r .G T.,'- :z..."5z . , . X": .... ,�.il�r�,• . 1r. .:. �, �. ?h? , , •-`4_, .�., .:�,�S .:.'P2��: ��: , v <,'s'"� '�'_,`.,;`� .5. :-t". r�.a Wg::.•: *t _:.�t<,k Z;,.. .::� x�r> .,,t'��, ::.•.� +.. .., a:.�.t�.q..'+>.<,e�-��.:s�-'...,.>- -.,s._F�r.a22..4�A`2L�,. 7. ..T?Y,. h�_: .x.. t':.:x...nfs -� .-+� s�?'.r {{�,•�e�`�.,,s7,a,+�r.?.a�-.�p_ - �.s+x. 'a . ,' �-s.. .�d'''.�`ys.p� 'p y�rr.,it"' 'V 7#e iC�,, dy1 ti'f Z.,,,, ,s y...J`,,s` + ,fa, f c vii, '"t4.,r ' . r."� y ,r -- .)f 3---tf, y'e". 6 t+ % tw, ,`r n'T 'i`Y f t G IZ v II his.} ;;:4A1! "� `.�•+ royxr ,},i` i 5n`d r... a .• r" Y Y western IA Awir' eless , •f,- 1 Y v M 'WI '' ��ata $uuPa�cao IR i4 •1. I II il -" t. 14 � ,i . ',/ .44. ,t;- . -i NI . • 4..'-% • - . rj,• 1 ''r ' ' • ' r :'-,;•f• .- ' . I <— - , , r i'•. .37• • AZJ•-414. -1.' tit+ ; I .�► "' 4° II r E1PI f f ,, I • . , • , . 4...,' .. 4". - AP '. _ , ..., ' • • Y. r 7.. -1 .., _ rr t • . All : .Ist,. 1be,,. ., %.- .1 Lf% . . . , ill EXISTING "`' • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • :. F. p • .�• • _ - ;, • �a r s � ST—JTJRGTJAIRII E • A.--;— • uI1 ! i.t _STORAGE site #SE3 -411 -A • , 1111 EQUIPMENT VIEW • ., Sxte!MI= Extend Mercer South-Shurgmgr4.Storage Site Nnrnbet:u,E-3411-A - 3411 i 01.DOC 9/25/96 C 0 F) o` -'A Jr,.-'"--Oto\ 1 CELLULAR LEASE AGREEMENT �9 "�Vs? N (Building) ‘.0-'0 • TIiis Agreement, made this 20th day of September, 1996, between IDS/Shurgard dime Growth Partners L.P. II (Shurgard), a Washington limited partnership with its principal offices located at 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200, Seattle, Washington 98101, hereinafter designated LESSOR, and Western PCS BTA Development Corporation, a corporation of the State of Delaware with its principal offices at 2001 NW Sammamish Rd., Issaquah, WA 98027, hereinafter designated LESSEE. WITNESSETH In consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and intending to be legally bound hereby, the Parties hereto agree as follows: LEASE AGREEMENT 1. Leased Premises. LESSOR is the owner of Property located at 1755 NE 48th St., Renton, WA 98056, legally described on the attached Exhibit A (hereinafter `Property") . Subject to the following terms and conditions, LESSOR leases to LESSEE, that portion of the Property described in Exhibt"B" and attachments thereto. 2. Access. LESSOR grants LESSEE the non-exclusive right for ingress and egress across the common areas of the Property and to the Premises seven (7) days a week, twenty-four (24) hours a day, on foot or motor vehicle, including trucks, for the use of the Premises as described herein, and for the installation and maintenance of utility wires, cables, conduits and pipes extending from the nearest public right-of-way, to the Premises. LESSEE shall not have roof access to the Premises unless LESSOR's personnel are on the Property. LESSEE shall be provided with a list of the names and telephone numbers of LESSOR's personnel whom LESSEE may contact for purposes of arranging roof access or other assistance after normal office hours ("After Hours Access"). LESSEE shall pay a fee to LESSOR for After Hours Access, said fee to be determined by LESSEE but not to exceed One Hundred Dollars, (1) if LESSEE fails to arm or rearm the security system, or (2) if LESSEE receives a charge from its security company with regard to LESSEE's improper handling of the security system during After Hours Access, or (3) if it is necessary for LESSOR to come to the Premises to provide LESSEE After Hours Access to the roof. 3. Use. (a) LESSEE shall use the Premises for the purpose of constructing, maintaining and operating a Communications Facility (as defined and described in Exhibit C hereto) and uses directly related thereto. The renovation of the Premises to meet LESSEE's needs (including without limitation the cost of structural reinforcement of or other improvement of the Premises) shall be at LESSEE's sole expense. LESSEE will maintain the interior of j:legal\cm\contract\formcell.doc - 1 - • the building and the other portions of the Premises in a safe and reasonable condition throughout the Lease term. No structural alterations, reinforcements or other improvement to the Premises shall be made by LESSEE prior to the submission to and approval by LESSOR of plans and specifications describing such alterations, reinforcement or improvements. LESSEE shall apply for and obtain all permits necessary to its use of the Premises. (b) It is understood and agreed that LESSEE's ability to use the Premises is contingent upon its obtaining after the execution date of this Lease all of the certificates, permits and other approvals that may be required by any Federal, State or Local authority as well as a satisfactory building structural analysis which will permit LESSEE use of the Premises as set forth above. LESSOR shall cooperate with LESSEE in its efforts to obtain such approvals, provided that such cooperation shall be at LESSEE's expense, and shall take no action which would adversely affect the status of the Property or Premises with respect to the proposed use thereof by LESSEE without notice to LESSEE. In the event that Lessee Shall not be able to reasonably obtain such approvals, then LESSEE shall have the right to terminate this Lease upon sixty (60) days notice and payment to LESSOR of a termination fee in the amount of six (6) months rent. Notice of the LESSEE's exercise of its right to terminate shall be given to LESSOR in writing by certified mail, return receipt requested. All prepaid rentals for periods after the effective date of termination set forth in the notice to include the termination fee described above, shall be retained by the LESSOR as its sole remedy for LESSEE's termination. Upon the effective date of the notice of termination, this Lease shall terminate. (c) LESSOR makes no representation regarding the zoning of the Property, or the suitability of the Premises for LESSEE's intended use. LESSEE shall be responsible to determine the zoning of the Property and the suitability of the Premises for its intended use. LESSEE shall be responsible to determine and comply with all applicable building code and other laws and regulations governing LESSEE's use of the Premises, and whether there are any applicable title restrictions. 4. Term/Commencement. (a) Initial Term/Option Term. This Lease shall be for an initial term of five (5) years beginning on the Commencement Date. Subject to the provisions of Section 15, LESSEE shall have the option to extend this Lease for two (2) additional five year terms by giving the LESSOR written notice of its intention to do so at least six (6) months prior to the end of the then current term. The Commencement Date of this Lease shall be defined as the earlier of the first day of the first month following LESSEE 's notice to LESSOR in writing that LESSEE has obtained all permits and approvals necessary for LESSEE to be legally entitled to construct the Communications Facility for providing communications services to the Premises, or Six (6) months from the below signature date of Lessor. If LESSEE has not obtained all necessary permits by the Commencement Date and LESSEE has not terminated this Lease pursuant to Section 3(b) above, LESSEE shall commence paying a j:legal\cm\contract\formcell.doc - 2 - • monthly rental of$200.00 until such time that all permits are obtained, at which time the rent shall increase to the initial annual rent set forth in Paragraph 5. (b) Renewal Terms. If at the end of the Lease term this Lease has not been terminated by either party giving to the other written notice of an intention to terminate it at least three (3) months prior to the end of such term, this Lease shall continue in force upon the same covenants, terms and conditions for a term of one (1) year and for annual renewal terms thereafter until terminated by either party upon three (3) months written notice. Annual rental adjustments shall be made at the commencement of each such annual renewal as specified in Section 5 below, except that an adjustment will be made annually, and there will be no limit on such adjustments. 5. Rent. Except as provided by Section 4(a) above, upon the Commencement Date, LESSEE shall pay to LESSOR basic rent in the amount of$780.00 per Month ("Initial Monthly Rental"). Thereafter LESSEE agrees to pay rent in monthly installments in advance on the first day of each month during said term at the office of LESSOR or'such other place as LESSOR may designate, without any set off or deduction whatsoever. A late fee of 5% will be assessed for any payment received more than ten (10) days after the due date. The initial monthly rental provided herein shall be subject to annual adjustment, on each anniversary of the Commencement Date (Adjustment Date). The adjustment may result in the rent being increased but not decreased no less then three percent (3%) annually and no more then eight percent (8%) annually. LESSOR shall notify LESSEE of the new rental rate at least thirty (30) days before the Adjustment Date. Subject to the limitations specified in this paragraph, rent adjustments shall be determined as follows: (a) The basis for computing each such adjustment shall be the Consumer Price Index (CPI-U) All Urban Consumers, US City Average, All Items (1982- 1984=100), published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics for the month of the Commence Date (Base Index). (b) Two (2) months prior to the Adjustment Date, LESSOR shall obtain the most recently published CPI-U as specified in (1) above (the Adjustment Index). If the Adjustment Index is higher than the Base Index, then the following term's annual rental is determined by multiplying the then current annual rent by a fraction, the numerator of which is the Adjustment Index and the denominator of which is the Base Index. (c) If the referenced index (1982-1984=100) of the CPI is revised, the Base Index to be used herein will be converted to a new base reference index in accordance with the conversion table published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. If the index is discontinued or changed in such a way that it is impossible to obtain a continuous measurement of price changes from a prior Adjustment Date to the Adjustment Date in question, the index shall be replaced by such other governmental index or computation as would provide j:legal\cm\contract\formcell.doc - 3 - • substantially the same result as would have been obtained had the index not been discontinued or changed. 6. Utilities. LESSEE shall cause the installation of a separate meter for the electric service, if any, LESSEE will need for its intended uses of the Premises. LESSEE shall be responsible directly to the serving entities for all such utilities. LESSEE shall apprise LESSOR of the extent of work necessary to set up the separate meter prior to its installation. In the event an easement is necessary for any such utilities, LESSEE shall provide LESSOR with copies of the proposed easement, together with plans defining the area of the proposed easement for LESSOR's approval. LESSOR's approval of the easement, and the proposed easement area shall not unreasonably be withheld or delayed. In the event a meter cannot be installed by the utility company, then LESSEE shall pay LESSOR for all electrical services to the Premises. LESSOR and LESSEE agree to be bound by a survey of electrical consumption determined by a reputable electrical engineer, to be selected by LESSOR. 7. Insurance. (a) Lessee. During the term of this Lease, LESSEE shall maintain, and provide LESSOR satisfactory evidence of personal property insurance in an amount sufficient to fully protect all personal property owned or controlled by LESSEE (including any fixtures or improvements of LESSEE such as the communications tower and any building constructed appurtenant thereto) from theft, fire, or other damage while upon the Property. LESSEE shall also maintain, and provide LESSOR satisfactory evidence of Commercial General Liability insurance in the amount of$1,000,000.00 bodily injury, including death, and property damage. LESSOR shall be named as an additional insured on both policies of insurance. (b) Lessor. LESSOR shall maintain in full force and effect throughout the term of this Lease fire insurance in an amount equal to the replacement cost of the improvements on the Property, not including LESSEE's personal property now or hereafter located on LESSOR's Property. For purposes of this Lease "LESSEE's personal property" is defined to include fixtures affixed to LESSOR's Property by LESSEE and the communications tower and any structures constructed or installed by LESSEE on the Premises). LESSEE shall reimburse LESSOR the cost of any increase in its liability insurance due to LESSEE's use , improvements, additions or modifications to the Property. LESSOR shall provide LESSEE with sufficient documentation of LESSOR's liability insurance cost and any increase due to LESSEE's use, improvements or modifications to the Property. (c) All policies of Property/fire insurance obtained by either party pursuant to this Lease shall include a clause or endorsement waiving the insurer's rights of subrogation against the other party. 8. [Omitted] j:legal\cm\contract\formcell.doc - 4 - 9. Indemnity. (a) LESSEE shall defend, indemnify and hold LESSOR harmless from and against any and all loss, cost, liability or damage (including reasonable attorney's fees and court costs) arising out of the use and occupancy of the Premises by the LESSEE, its servants or agents. Notwithstanding the preceding, LESSEE shall not be required to indemnify LESSOR against any claim to the extent that it arises from or in connection with the gross negligence or intentional misconduct of LESSOR. (b) LESSOR shall defend, indemnify and hold LESSEE harmless from and against any loss, cost, liability or damage (including reasonable attorney's fees and court costs) arising out of the use and occupancy of the Premises by LESSOR. Notwithstanding the preceding, LESSOR shall not be required to indemnify LESSEE against any claim to the li extent that it arises from or in connection with the gross negligence or intentional misconduct of LESSEE, its agents, servants or employees. 10. Destruction/Condemnation. (a) Destruction. In the event that the building containing the Premises, or access to it, is damaged or destroyed by fire or other casualty covered by the form of fire and . . extended coverage insurance maintained by LESSOR, LESSOR shall promptly commence appropriate repairs, restoration and/or reconstruction (to be diligently prosecuted to completion entirely at LESSOR's expense), and this Lease shall continue in full force and effect. In the event, however, that the building is so damaged or destroyed to the extent that more than one-half(1/2) of its replacement cost, or to any substantial extent by a casualty not so covered by insurance, LESSOR may elect, by written notice to LESSEE given within twenty (20) days after the occurrence of the casualty, not to commence repairs, and under such circumstances, LESSEE or LESSOR, may immediately cancel this Lease by giving written notice of its election to cancel to LESSOR. (b) Condemnation. If the Premises or any portion thereof are taken under the power of eminent domain, or sold by LESSOR under the threat of the exercise of said power (all of which is herein referred to as "condemnation"), this Lease shall terminate as to the part so taken as of the date the condemning authority takes title or possession, whichever occurs first. The parties shall be entitled to make their respective claims against the condemning authority for condemnation proceeds . Absent a specific award to LESSEE by the condemning authority LESSEE shall not be entitled to recover any part of the award for the taking of any part of the Premises, but Lessee shall be entitled in all cases to pursue from condemning authority an award for its improvements and personal property. 11. Interference. LESSEE agrees to have installed communication equipment of the type and frequency which will not cause measurable interference to LESSOR, other current lessees of the Premises or neighboring landowners to the extent of such uses as of the date of this Lease. In the event LESSEE's equipment causes such interference LESSEE will take all steps necessary to correct and eliminate the interference. LESSOR agrees that jaegal\cm\contract\formcell.doc - 5 - LESSOR and/or any other tenants of the Property who in the future take possession of LESSOR's building or any portion of the Property will be permitted to install only such communication equipment that is of the type and frequency which will not cause measurable interference to LESSEE. In the event any such interference does not cease promptly, the parties acknowledge that continuing interference may cause irreparable injury and, therefore, the LESSEE OR LESSOR shall have the right, in addition to any other rights that it may have at law or in equity, to bring action to enjoin such interference or to terminate this Lease if interference has not halted within 48 hours after written notice to Lessor. In the event any such LESSOR's or tenant's equipment causes such interference, LESSOR will use all efforts to eliminate the interference. 12. Termination. LESSEE, upon termination of the Lease, shall remove its equipment, personal property and all fixtures, all utility connections and meters, and all improvements and restore the Premises to its original condition, reasonable wear and tear excepted. If the parties agree that LESSEE may remain on the Premises after expiration of termination of this Lease, LESSEE shall pay rent at the then existing monthly rate or on the existing monthly pro-rata basis if based upon a longer payment term, until such time as the removal of the equipment, personal property and all fixtures, are completed. (a) Except as otherwise provided herein, this Lease may be terminated, without any penalty or further liability as follows: 1. Upon thirty (30) days written notice by LESSOR for failure to cure a material default for payment of amounts due under this Lease within that thirty (30) day period; 2. Upon thirty (30) days written notice by either party if the other party defaults and fails to cure or commence curing such default within that 30-day period, or such longer period as may be required to diligently compete a cure commenced within that 30-day period; 3. Upon ninety (90) days written notice by LESSEE if the Property, Building or the Antenna Facilities are or become unacceptable under LESSEE's design of engineering specifications for its Antenna Facilities or the communications system to which the Antenna Facilities belong, provided termination fee in paragraph 3b is paid to LESSOR by LESSEE. 13. Notice. All notices hereunder must be in writing and shall be deemed validly given if delivered personally or sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed as follows (or any other address that the Party to be notified may have designed to the sender by like notice): j:legal\cm\contract\formcell.doc - 6 - LESSEE: Western PCS BTA Development Corporation Attn: PCS Leasing Administrator -1- t u8 ,Suite-2OO 2001 NW Sammamish Rd. , Suite 100 -B fi vt -•WA•W*5- Issaquah, WA 98027 Phone: (206) 636-9300- 313-5200 Fax: (206)-635-1026-- 313-5520 /kV with a copy to: Western PCS BTA Development Corporation Attn: Legal Department 33 -12At •Aveia -N1 -Stgite-2A9-. 2001 NW Sammamish Rd. , Suite 100 -Bell -WA-9g0g5 Issaquah, WA 98027 Phone: (206) 63-5-63fe 313-5200 Fax: (206) 6354426. 313-5520 LESSOR: Shurgard of Kennydale 1755 NE 48th St. Renton, WA 98056 With a copy to: SSC Property Holdings, Inc. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, Washington 98101 Attention: Field Services 14. Mortgages. Landlord represents that Landlord's property, including the Leased Premises, is subject to a certain mortgage or mortgages granted by Landlord. Landlord shall use reasonable efforts to obtain a mutually acceptable Subordination and Non- Disturbance Agreement executed by Landlord's lender. Tenant shall reimburse Landlord for reasonable expenses, if any, incurred by Landlord to obtain any such executed Agreement. 15. Additions and Modifications to Premises. This Lease shall not be construed so as to preclude additions, deletions, or modifications by LESSOR to LESSOR's own facilities at this location. LESSOR agrees, however, to notify LESSEE of any additions, deletions, or modifications to its own facilities at this location which LESSOR believes may interfere with LESSEE's intended use. (During the initial term and first five (5) year option term, however, LESSOR shall not make any additions, deletions or modifications that would require relocation of LESSEE's tower or communication equipment to another location on the Property or would interfere with LESSEE's use or operation of the Communications Facility.) After the expiration of the first five year option term, LESSOR j:legal\cm\contract\formcell.doc - 7 - modification to this Lease shall be void and ineffective unless made in writing signed by the Parties. (e) This Lease and the performance thereof shall be governed, interpreted, construed and regulated by the laws of the State or other jurisdiction in which the Property is located. (f) This Lease may not be sold, assigned or transferred by the LESSEE without the prior written approval or consent of the LESSOR, which such consent will not be unreasonably withheld. LESSEE's transfer of this Lease shall not relieve it of its obligation to LESSOR under the terms of this Lease. (g) This Lease shall extend to and bind the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of the Parties hereto. (h) At the request of LESSEE, LESSOR agrees to execute a Memorandum of this Lease Agreement which LESSEE may record with the appropriate Recording Officer. The date set forth in the Memorandum of Lease is for recording purposes only and bears no reference to commencement of either term or rent payments. (i) Any claim, controversy or dispute arising out of this Lease shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the applicable rules of the American Arbitration Association (Commercial Arbitration Rules), and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator.may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The arbitration shall be conducted in the county in which the Property is located unless otherwise agreed by the parties. (j) LESSEE'shall at all times keep Property and Premises free from Mechanic's Lien arising out of LESSEE's construction or other activity on the Property. 18. Waiver of LESSOR's Lien. LESSOR hereby waives any and all lien rights it may have, statutory or otherwise, concerning the Communication Facilities or any portion thereof which shall be deemed personal property for the purposes of this Lease, regardless of whether or not the same is deemed real or personal property under applicable laws, and LESSOR gives LESSEE and Mortgageas defined below) the right to remove all or any portion of the same from time to time, whether before or after a default under this Lease, in LESSEE's and or Mortgagee's sole discretion and without LESSOR's consent. 19. Assigned Interest. LESSEE may, upon notice to LESSOR, mortgage or grant a security interest in this Lease and the Antenna Facilities, and may assign this Lease and the Antenna Facilities to any mortgagees or holders of security interests, including their successors or assigns, (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Mortgagees"), provided such Mortgagees agree to be bound by the terms and provision of this Lease. In such event, LESSOR shall execute such consent to leasehold financing as may reasonably be required j:legal\cm\contract\formcell.doc - 9 - i I . may make any additions, deletions or modifications to its Property, provided LESSOR provides LESSEE the option to relocate its building or tower to another location on the Property if a location satisfactory to LESSEE and LESSOR is available. If an alternative acceptable location is not available, LESSOR or LESSEE may terminate this Lease. In the event, LESSOR intends to make additions, deletions or modifications that would necessitate the relocation of LESSEE's building or tower, LESSOR shall give one year advance notice of such anticipated addition, deletion or modification. Likewise, no such additions, deletions, or modifications of LESSEE's facilities at this location shall be made which harmfully interfere with LESSOR's or LESSOR's tenants use at this location. 16. Hazardous Substance. LESSEE shall not treat, use, generate, store or release any hazardous substance (as defined below) on the Premises. LESSEE shall indemnify, defend and hold LESSOR, its agents or employees, harmless from and against any claim, cost, expense, including reasonable attorneys' and consultants' fees, damage, penalty, or liability imposed upon LESSOR, whenever alleged or made, resulting from the treatment, storage, generation, release, or disposal of any substance by LESSEE, its agents or employees, on, under, in or about the Property, which substance is designated as hazardous, dangerous, toxic, or harmful or subject to regulation under federal, state, or local environmental or safety law, regulation or ordinance ("Hazardous Substance"). Except to the extent caused by LESSEE, its agents or employees, LESSOR shall indemnify, defend, and hold LESSEE, its agents and employees, harmless from and against any claim, cost expense, including reasonable attorneys' and consultants' fees, damage, penalty, or liability imposed upon LESSEE, whenever alleged or made, resulting from the treatment, storage, generation, release, or disposal by LESSOR, its agents and employees, of any Hazardous Substance on, under, in or about the Premises. This section shall survive the termination of this Lease. 17. Miscellaneous. (a) Should the LESSOR, at any time during the term of this Lease, decide to sell all or any part of the Property to a purchaser other than LESSEE, such sale shall be subject to this Lease and LESSEE's rights hereunder. (b). LESSOR covenants that LESSEE, on paying the rent and performing covenants contained herein shall peaceably and quietly have, hold and enjoy the leased Premises. (c) LESSOR covenants that LESSOR is seized of good and sufficient title and interest to the Premises and has full authority to enter into and execute this Lease. (d) It is agreed and understood that this Lease contains all agreements, promises and understandings between the LESSOR and LESSEE and that no verbal or oral agreements, promises or understandings shall be binding upon either the LESSOR or LESSEE in any dispute, controversy or proceeding at law, and any addition, variation or j:legal\cm\contract\formcell.doc - 8 - i by Mortgagees. LESSOR agrees to notify LESSEE and LESSEE'S Mortgagees simultaneously of any default by LESSEE and to give Mortgagee the same right to cure any default as LESSEE or to remove any property of LESSEE or Mortgagee located on the Premises, except that the cure period for any Mortgagee shall not be less that thirty (30) days after receipt of the default notice, as provided in Section 12 of this Lease. All such notices to Mortgagees shall be sent to Mortgagee at the address specified by LESSEE upon entering into a financing agreement, Failure by LESSOR to give Mortgagee such notice shall not diminish LESSOR'S rights against LESSEE, but shall preserve all rights of Mortgagee to cure any default and to remove any property of LESSEE or Mortgagee located on the Preemies, as provided in Section 12 of this Lease. • 20. Co-Location. LESSEE shall construct its tower on the Premises to accommodate the placement of an additional antenna array on the tower, in addition to LESSEE's antenna array. LESSOR and LESSEE acknowledge that either party may negotiate to locate an additional user on LESSEE's tower; provided, however, that such proposed additional user shall not be allowed to locate on LESSEE's tower without the mutual consent of both LESSOR and LESSEE. The party negotiating with the proposed additional user shall provide the other party for its review and approval the plans and specifications for the proposed additional user's antenna array and related equipment and the proposed agreement(s) between such parties relating to the use of the Property and the Premises by the proposed additional user. Within 30 days of the receipt of such information, the reviewing party shall consent or object to the proposed additional user and the proposed agreement(s). Any agreements relating to the additional user shall be subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and subject to such other terms and conditions as agreed to by LESSOR, LESSEE and the proposed additional user. The proposed additional user shall pay not less than the current market rate for the use of LESSEE's tower and the Property and the gross revenues paid (excluding utility charges if any) with respect to the same shall be split equally between LESSOR and LESSEE. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hands and affixed their respective seals the day and year first above written. LESSOR: LESSEE: IDS/Shurgard Income Growth Partners L.P. II Western PCS BTA Development Corporatio D law e orporation. By: Shurgard Associates L.P. II Its: General Partner BY: ITS: By: SHURGARD GENERAL PARTNER INC. Its: Gene''- • Par I er BY• � A.4741 ITS: y P jaegal\cm\contract\formcell.doc - 10 - CORPORATE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss COUNTY OF KING) On this/.9"day of 0e/vat A.D. 1996, before me personally appeared g Jd) ,/-. '�,� ��to me known to be the P • of Western PCS BTA Development Corporation, the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the same instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed thereto is the seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year first above wrifi enREpq%,,, tS ,r o�OZA,p - y Notar P i JAI for the State of , residing in A(/B�\ = My commission expires IP 'is,,77 03-9q,`—�p� = '9 '11%% ,S,,` 6 — I1' „ OF WASka° S SHURGARD NOTARY ACKNOWLEtnitni TT: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of (Aber , 1996, before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Mark A. Hall, to me known to be the Vice President of Shurgard General Partner, Inc., general partner of the general partner of IDS/SHURGARD INCOME GROWTH PARTNERS L.P., II the entity that executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of`:,aid entity for the uses and purposes therein mentioned and also stated that is authorized to execute said instrument. ��`.N 6. 1(,vdt WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL HERETO AFFIXED the day and r .�3s ON���'o + �,�P��,s -.o .13 st above written. icri" µOTARY �N� n as * _ I I! NO Y PUBLIC in and for the tate/' ' _ PUBBe of ashington, residing at A „�. , ! � .8 04 w9'i��.•v�� My commission expires: , ,' 7 ,_k INNj:legal\cm\contract\formcell.doc - 11 - Exhibit A Legal Description of LESSOR's Property Parcel A: Lot 2, King County short plat No. 485069, recorded under King county recording No. 8612231555, Records of King County, Washington. Parcel B: An easement for ingress, egress and utilities over the southerly 29 feet, as measured along the east line of lot 1, city of Renton LLA-015-82, Recorded under King County auditor's file No. 8301259003, being a portion of: Tract 185, C.D. Hillmans Lake Washington Garden of Eden addition to Seattle, Division No. 3, According to the plat thereof recorded in volume 11 of plats, page 81, records of King County, Washington. both situate in the County of King, State of Washington. j:legal\cm\contract\formcell.doc - 12 - �2+i 1o/at. nr;L 10:4z rA. GUt3 401 11301 1TH/YI.J Legal I1LI UUL • EXHIBIT B Premises Location Within the Property To the Rooftop Site Lease with Option dated ,between as Landlord,and Western PCS BTA Development Corporation,as Tenant. The location of the Premises within the Property is more particularly described and depleted as follows: ..a.SO .,.•.a . •.•••L ' :rr 1 RL rerov.R.r...f LKL- i ..c•m L,,.R.._«••wort. ..rp. oarsac c ---_ 4,010.1 propeS . IIIPYn4 W7 -e C.Afloa goon iSsc.afu! • I r<.aolrc ra • r . "—cos:.Oar sett no. • �• -ord.... ,o .•w .,y • 'N : 1\. 0...R.+WP • V Not to Scale 1.Final Antenna type and configuration subject to final radio frequency engineer and zoning analysis. • 2.Actual equipment location and conduits subject to final architectural design. 3.Final equipment location subject to structural engineer analysis. Site Name: • Site Number: /te� 9/17/96 7 Exhibit C Definition of"Communication Facilities" LESSEE shall have the right, at its expense, to erect and maintain on the Premises improvements, personal property and facilities necessary to operate its system, including without limitation radio transmitting and receiving antennas, and tower and bases, an electronic equipment shelter, and related cables and utility lines (collectively the "Communication Facilities"). The Communication Facilities shall be initially configured generally as set forth in Exhibit"B". LESSEE shall have the right to replace or upgrade the Communication Facilities at any time during the term of this Lease. LESSEE shall cause all construction to occur lien-free and in compliance with all applicable laws and ordinances. The Communication Facilities shall remain the exclusive property of LESSEE. LESSEE shall have the right to remove the Communication Facilities upon termination of this Lease. 41/i/ j:legal\cm\contract\formcell.doc - 14 - I ADDENDUM TO SITE LEASE WITH OPTION [Additional Terms] 1. At Clause 6, add after the first sentence; "Landlord may enter into leases with other telecommunications providers." 2. At Clause 7(a), add at the end; "If Tenant fails to remove the Antenna Facilities after termination of the Lease,upon ninety(90)days prior written notice from Landlord, Landlord shall remove the Antenna Facilities and shall have the right to be reimbursed from Tenant for all costs associated with such removal and include a two thousand dollar($2,000) fee separate from the costs. The Execution Date of this Addendum is the day of , 199_. LANDLORD: 5i►c[f J e Cet ks TENANT:Western PCS BTA I Corporation By: By: Its: Le45.1. itiak{� ej Its: S.S./Tax No.: ` r� (.�383�J7 t.nn 4 CIT`i OF RENTON July15, 1997 i RECEIVED 1 / western® JUL 2 1997 1 wireless Jennifer Henning BUILDING DIVISION Planning Department City of Renton 0illAvenuouthRA5 [11 IL DIvICai9O1N- Re: Letter of Completeness Dear Ms. Henning: This letter is in response to your correspondence dated July 10, 1997. Our comments on items A - I are as follows: Item A: According to Susie Anderson of our staff, a copy of this map has been provided to you and is part of our application. Item B: Enclosed are copies of photo simulations of the proposed facility. Please let me know if additional simulations would be helpful. Please note that photo simulations from the east have not been provided because the property to the east is heavily wooded and houses east of that lot would not be able to see the monopole. Item C: A map showing the service area is enclosed. Item D: We have no existing facilities within the Renton city limits or outside of the City within Vz mile. Item E: Per our discussion today, we are proposing a masonry wall to surround the base of the facility which will completely obscure the equipment cabinets from public view. The material will be similar in color to the Shurgard buildings and the texture will be similar to the retaining wall located at the southern most extreme of the Shurgard site. This material was chosen because it would blend in with the existing site most effectively. The masonry wall will be six feet high with a chain link gate with wodden slats. Item F: Enclosed is a copy of our standard lease and an addendum addressing the specific issues contained in the City of Renton's Wireless Communications Ordinance. Item G: Enclosed is a copy of our standard lease and an addendum addressing the specific issues contained in the City of Renton's Wireless Communications Ordinance. Western Wireless Corporation 330 120th Avenue NE,#110 Bellevue,WA 98005 FAX(206) 451-4739 FAX(206) 451-7987 r,1TY�F RENT D Letter to Jennifer Henning July 15, 1997 ja 211997 Page 2 BuILDt— Item H: Enclosed is a report from our Director of Engineering describing the support structure and the technical reasons for its design. His is based on the design shown on our plans and they should be referred to in considering his report. Item I: Enclosed is documentation establishing the structural integrity for the support structure. en a revie ' . Also, I am including revised pages for sheets 1 and 10. Please accept my thanks for your kind assistance in this application process. Sincerely, Kirk J. Vinish, AICP Senior Zoning Analyst Encl. y / '\ Western Wireless Seattle ILLIE - v cc-wattle —a Best Server �_ ` CeIICAD II v3.1 �= SttnList -- Shurgard Storage1405 11 ?:_� �-=V lilt : --M. -59N LON:122-11-40W t $1 i , TN:O 'TN TXHT:100 ft01 W ANT:DB978H90W:O LD:100TN:120 'TN TXHT:100ftIIIww _ ��` 01 W ANT:DB978H90W:O LD:100 =_,_ .-4 STN:V3 ORTN:220 'TN TXHT:100 ft oi � _� -� ERP:174.04 W ANT:D8978H90 I _ DT:OE HW:O LD:100 11111lWEV--,- ' ill ==.--sr i 7. I M, ..,..1,M i...ki;.., wr,..=. ....._ iiih, A / ki = '1''"' it Ir. MIES'W,-..'''' ''r....."'= INP—stal= -- ---- ---_ , --- . ,_____ ..ER - .__.4 s_iii - -War z---.=—.--•::-, -�_--. -_ - -_ �f�.i.■. -- ...E_ -� THRESHOLDS OVERLAYS MI ,=..._ 0 (>= dBm) wsr�sr >=-68 Primary roads NIMIr-v.WEL.W.A.= >=-73 Secondary roa 1161- -- _ma >=78 Tertiary roads n= >=-82 Secondary roads >=-91 Gwnty boundaries ail FA.I.: Nom .-..._ miles • • • - ES 11:1 0 0.25 0.50 0.75 I SCALE: 1:24,000 07/16/97 09:14 Alternate cellular antenna platform configurations shall not affect pole Alkperformance. 13'-5" TYP Aitaippt6 W. ak VA, 411 Il • 60'-0" • r L 57'-0. • • ' I NOTES: I 1. POLE SHAFT-GOVERNING REACTIONS: r MOMENT - 3,709 IN-KIPS SHEAR - 6,634 # ' rJ VERTICAL - 6,097 # 6, 2. SLIP JOINT JACKING FORCE: MINIMUM - 25,000# `' MAXIMUM - 90,000# 6, 3. FINISH: GALVANIZED PER ASTM A-123. 32'-0" POWDER COATED OVERCAST GRAY 6 PER VALMONT SPEC F-283Y. 4. POLE DESIGN CONFORMS TO EIA/TIA-222-E FOR: 4.1 28'-4" A. 80 MPH WIND WITH NO ICE. B. 69 MPH WIND WITH 1/2" ICE. ra C. 50 MPH WIND WITH NO ICE, TWIST AND SWAY. , • . 5. DESIGN LOADING: ra A. 1-CELLULAR PLATFORM S 57' ELEV. B. 12-DB872H1O5's; MOUNTED ON PLATFORM FACES. C. 3-PD1O017's MOUNTED ON PLATFORM CORNERS. ., D. 1-4' DIA 10 0hz DISH S 50' ELEV. r 6, ra Foe° 12'-0' 29.20" 24.20" TYP TYP LO 8'-0" O O 1f BASEPLATE THICKNESS - 2.000" BOLT CIRCLE - 30.52" DIA BOLT LENGTH - 132.00" t�` 0'-0" SHAFT INFORMATION FOUNDATION SAC LENGTH 32'-00' B23.20" F8 4 " T0.02K 19" B 31'-08" 19.32" -4.58" 0.188" unmans laiti MAMMA60' POLE WITH VO OQ NT PLATFORM AND RAILS MAL F :POL002 VALMONT' *************************l *****************************1C******** City of Renton WA Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9704633 Amount: 200 . 00 07/21/97 16 :28 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #2102 WESTERN PC Init: LMN Project # : LUA97-092 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 334330-1125 Site Address : 1755 NE 48TH ST Total Fees : 1,205 . 12 This Payment 200 . 00 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 205 . 12 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 .345 . 81. 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 200 . 00 III 16 `31 ; 30—( ( -5 f --t?Lou c //-)c )14" ��n /)7194/7azvi4" 11 e ; CIZ - OF RENTON L Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 10, 1997 Mr. Kirk Vinish Western Wireless 330 120th Avenue NE,#10 Bellevue, WA 98005 Subject: Western Wireless at Shurgard (LUA-97-092,CU-A) Dear Mr. Vinish: We are unable to begin processing your application for an Administrative Conditional Use Permit until additional materials are received. According to Ordinance 4666 adopted by the Renton City Council on June 2, 1997 applicants must submit several items which were not included in your application packet. The additional required materials are detailed in the enclosed copy of Ord. 4666 (pps. 6 and 7) and include: A. A diagram or map depicting where within a 3-mile radius any portion of the proposed facility could be seen. B. Photosimulations of the proposed facility from affected residential properties and public rights-of-way at varying distances. C. A map showing the service area of the proposed wireless communications facility and an explanation of the need for that facility. D. An.inventory of the provider's existing facilities with the Renton City corporate limits, and any other facilities outside the city limits that is within 1/2 mile of the proposed facility. E. A site/landscaping plan showing the specific placement of the wireless communications facility on the site, showing the location of the existing structures, trees, and other significant site features to be retained; and indicating type and locations of existing and new plant materials used to screen wireless communications components and the proposed color for the wireless communications facility. F. A signed notarized stated indicating that the applicant agrees to allow for the potential collocation of additional wireless communications equipment by other providers on the applicant's structure or within the same site location; and, that the applicant agrees to remove the facility within 6 months after the site's use is discontinued or if the facility falls into disrepair, and restore the site to its pre-existing condition. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 •1e T-- 4 . • G. A draft lease agreement with the landholder to enter into leases with other providers; and which specifies that if the provider fails to remove the facility upon 6 months of its discontinued use, the responsibility for removal falls upon the landholder. H. A report including a description of the support structure with technical reasons for its design. I. Documentation establishing the structural integrity for the support structure's proposed uses. Ordinance 4666 was adopted on an emergency basis and became effective immediately, however, the City Council's Planning and Development Committee will be discussing possible modifications to the Ordinance on Thursday, July 24, 1997 at 3:30 pm at the Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South.The meeting is scheduled to be held in the 6th floor conference room. The Western Wireless proposal requires environmental review, primarily due to the height of the facility, but also because an administrative conditional use permit.triggers environmental review. You have provided the environmental checklist, but we did not collect the appropriate fee for the environmental review. If the project value is greater than $100,000 then the subsequent fee for environmental review (over and above the administrative conditional use permit fee) is $500. If the project value is less than $100,000 then the susequent fee for environmental review is$200. Finally, the environmental checklist contains errors on sheets 1 and 10. The checklist states that a building permit and variance would be obtained from City of Kirkland, and that the City of Kirkland Zoning Code affects the proposal. Please revise these pages as appropriate and resubmit the new pages. Page 10 requires a new original signature. I would be happy to meet with you and discuss the submittal requirements, or to suggest locations for the photosimulations. We will begin processing your application when the requested materials are received. Should you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact me at(425) 277-6186. Sipcerely, f.,(1f,t,t1vD__) Jennifer Toth Henning . enclosure • :::::>' <: ::.:>` Ki...•»< : : :::> i$:,.. ::::::.:: ::::::::;.....::::::::::::::::; >::.:.::::;:.;: <:.: :;...... ::....:................:.::::. . . . :... ::: ......................... .... .:......................... .. r.::Fes,.,'... .....:�..........::::....... ......................:::::::::..:..........................: :::::::.::...:..........:...::.::..::.:::.:::::..... .IT. ...O.F..RENT.OIV :.:::. ::::::::::. :::..:...................................... ...,.............................::::....... ' , ppVELOPM NT SERbiCES DIUlSION ;:::.; :::i�::::::::::: .;::::::;:::i:::: i2;;;:;:i::i:::: ;. :':::::i::::::i::':�:::::::::;:i:�;::is :::: ::.::::: :::;::.::;:: :;i:: ::i::;:::;:;:i;:;:i;:;:ii: :ii::::i:ii::: :::i �5: ;i:::i:';i:%:::i::::r::ii::::::2::::'<::::::::::::::::::::::'}:`::::.`:;i;;#::::::;:::»:i::: ::%:::i::i::::%::::::i:::::::::.;Y:;:i;:i;::::;}2:i;;;:;:; .;:i::::::;:::i;::;::::;;:i is::i:;:;:i!;i:: :::::::::: ...... .:.............:::;....:.:.............................:.0......... ....( .)..........................:::: .::. i;::::i:: ::::i:::<:::>::>:::::...........:....OJE.CT ..::..F4:RMATI:ON::::.:......................... NoYe:>iffi i4:4.i s:rriore(iiia grit ae" :owner';`Teas!attach a'n addiii`.onl::: • 'no sized::Master>'•A':;;•lcaton.f r..each:o:wne '><::':<:::::::>::::::><`::;a>:::<::::<:;:: :>:; l,JeS�n f :• .PP .. •.:.. ........ ..:................:•.:•..... PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: tisionopote Get' NAME: 5h013 d 'v ' ,hor and 3t-Ora.���111e, 5 I 1- PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: I r1 5- N G ye`� �l Y L�1 1 '155 NE. St-reeii- . . CITY: ��`� ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): P)e/�► ,Vn q W 51,9 3.1 L-I 33 0 - 1125 TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): • :..;;;C 20(0.).:::. (_o514 "" 8� 3 ::,: :.::.::::::::::::::::. rnrn€Zcc.+`a I e, U <_<=.:'APP:Li:C....j if>otf•'e:r:<:than` o:wn:e'r:: :'simmi« PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: Add f 10 YI a I )Se -G r iti i fe l e5 s Vv e, n Vv ire le�S -Eel.eeo mr)lon i 0:a-1-i 011 -Rej t i COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: • , E04G ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): .530 I20h-, A re.- N E 3# ) i o _ ,,,A- CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: llevv _ 96co5 car - t V�TELEPHONE NUMBER: — C05cp. . . PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): • ..i'siiiiii,.i:::'.:...,.:.::.:.,:i0:.:s..9..5::,5:.;*‹..?.:::i:i:i:::i:.6,0,INTAL;v?..rchbijim:iii:::i:i:i*::i:i:•:*:.:i:i::.:if..*:.:i:i:i::.::.::.*:.:*:::.*:.,:.:•:::::::::m: NJ A . . ",, .„,,-.,-,....-:.:..,:,. .. .. ' ��,,Scry ,, e. :: gq�0.rR�y.A;r B•^• SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): • 'NAME:,..:•, .„ 0 �.� t to COMPANY(if applicable) PROJECT VALUE: ;,:,-,,,,,„,.1,:•,,,,to,..,‘ `W% ' • ": "~' ,p4y:, "': z� i (f_lESS • I V1 s, CO 01- r^f.S>9•�,�e4snana'lF> ayy? hR"a,w..;;v ADDS�Sd IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? An. ` O°* I20-rr, Fwe. NE S#I Ia CITY: ZIP: I !e4 ci 8�0s IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY ` �f //�) SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: ! �� 0�"' (i:q L o,.� SDI-&y-. .� a 1•i- Zr.ar'JS -'t^' , ('�ZS) 3rf O`722_ u <.::.ERTY::> At#a:ch;<se :ar.: she.e.t:....��e.cessar::..:1 .::::::.::..:::.::: ::::::::: :: ::::::><::<::<:<:::»>::>:::>::>:::LEGp,L::>DESCRI� )N:::::QF::::P:ROP (............. ............. ....... Y...........................,.:... ,-,,. 5E A-T TA"CI-/CO . N.i.?8:::FEE :::::>:;: «»:i:::::>€><>:: :>::<::: :>:::><:>:: ::>::>::><:<:: : :: ::>:< : :>PLI. >L�TI O.. f<will t>.=rm n'e;<fees :'<<>`' > <> > <>'„ >:>;:<;:;;:»»>:>:»:>::>:>< < ;>:::. < a....,- i ..de e. e ::>::>:::;.;:::<:::::>::::>_::>:> ::>;::::>::»::::::>:::::::. �he.ck:al[::a .. i'cation:<t . t ......C.... ...St ............... ... ....t..............e.... .e. ...........:.......................::::.:.::::. _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: — COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT . $ _ REZONE • $ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ , — SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ • _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ • /CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT `e$ /Ot90•O0 _ PRELIMINARY PLAT : . $. • • _ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ —GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ • _VARIANCE . $ •• - • (FROM SECTION: 1 — PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ _ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION ,MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ '' — MANAGEMENT •$ .d BINDING SITE PLAN $ ''' — .1 SHORELINE REVIEWS: ,i _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT -;$ .-= _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge — ENVIRONMENTAL.REVIEW . $ REVISION $ ' • • '' — _ ,Id • �Q '::ii:f; :iiii iii:^ii 'tit::::::i:t ::: <s;:::?: :?: "t: ::':::::::: :�:;•.;:.:.:.;ii:::.}v:!iii:::::,.:iw: :.:.;...,;...:.,_...,....i:<i�i:.::.iYi:i:::�i:>:iiiY::•:iY:?>;>;i:.ii:.iii:;^iiiiii:iii:.iii:.i:.:.iiiiiiiiiii:.i:.iii:.iiii:::i;i:.ii:.ii:i:: : .;.:_:>:.:»>:n>:;::::cc;•:o:;:;;;;<;o-::m:••••:oi;:i >: i:»:iiii>i: :::i<iiii;iiiiiiiiG:tii:it P:::i:: -••••.•-•:•i::i:«:::i::ii::ii::iii::::is:::ii::::ii::::;:<::<:;•,,...::iii::;...:;<:i<: i. :.,:: .<ii::,;:: ii:: i:::«ii::::ii:<:i:<:is<::<::i:::;:i ::<::<::«::<;<: i:: :i: >::>::<:«:::>i::i>::>::::::iiiii::i::i::i::i W'. ER HI. ............... ......... I, (Print Name) I')1./2,, ' I , declare that I am (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application,)c the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein.. contain the info mation herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. , '' ATTEST: Subscribe and sworn to before`�> . l .,Irk }�? d qt4, ... for the State of residing 1174 ��'�/�• 4P S. , am of Ow er/Representative) ` ' • - o - , on the d . ._ • ��TAf1y •: 1 . - ' Ajqt' /4. ill . ._- - (Signature of Owner/Representative) . . (Signat a of Notary Public) `-ii.%.•+t•10 %: •••%`` pu • p:�lll�SNl�i ` ::::::.;:.;:.:"; :itiKS.a .;:.::.;:.::.: .:.:>::;.;:.::.;.:::<.;:. :.;.;:.:i;;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;.;::.;;:.;<:.;:.:;:;::;;:::::.::.;:.;:. Ict o �to<be.c 1 to ... .... f . .................... ....::.;:.;:<.>;:.;:::.:ii:.i;::.::<:i<:<:>::i::i::�i:<:::;>�::i:: «<:ii::i<.>::iii><.iii:::::i:::::.. n... ... . .. m . . ... ..................... ;::;:.:.;:.;;:.;:.;;d :>.: N tuber.: :.: .;:.:.;:;; ::::..::::::::.;:.;:. .::.:;.::E.CE.....SA.....8.....SHP :;:::.:.:;.:.. ::: ,..::. ..:...;.;. . ii>. AD:.:;i: . :.i •:FPU.D::::»S A..................................................................... :::<:::::>:<:><:>;>::>:<:<:>:: :<;:;>:::'"'::` ; � .:...::...:.:: »::>�::�:: :>:: .: :...:.;:.:;:.;;:.:;:.;;:.::..;:;.;:....:..:....:;:�.;:.;...:..:.........;....:.....:..:: .... •:..:: ::::. ..i::i ii•�:<::i: .:ii:<:i:::::a:<:i::<::::::<::;<:�::iii>i:<:::>:� •::: .: .: .::. ::'::::';::i��::::;::::c::::::::. :::: ::::: � :.:. .:.�: ::.: .d .� :;iiiiii: :%':::::;iii:;`;'.: `::i': : .:.. . . .. : ::.:._:.::.;:.:::.. T.O..T,AL.:P.O.STAG.E.:.P.RQ.UIDED:. 5::.�.,�.:.�. .::.:::: .. : :.. ...::.: .....<. ;::;::.;:i>:::::::<:::i::::i:: «<:;::.i-::>:iT.OTA L..FE E S.....$.. . ... .. . MASTERAP.DOC. . REVISED 9/96. �� e Adopted by SSCI Board of Directors,May, 1995 ` '— "-=Z'iENERAL CONTRACTING AUTHORITY -- RESOLVED, that the President or any one of the Executive Vice Presidents or the Senior Vice Presidents,acting separately when a transaction involving property or services of$5,000,000 or less in value is involved and any two of them acting jointly when a transaction involving property or services exceeding $5,000,000 in value is involved, are hereby authorized to commit this corporation to the purchase, sale or lease, as lessor or lessee, or as a participant in any such transaction, of real or personal property, tangible or intangible, or products or services, to make or participate in any such purchase,sale or lease on credit,and to execute contracts, leases, deeds,bills of sale, easements, trust agreements, guarantees, indemnities, licenses and permits and other instruments with respect to any of the foregoing and that any two of the President, the Executive Vice Presidents and Senior Vice Presidents, acting jointly, shall have the authority to delegate in writing all or any part of such authority to such person or persons as they may from time to time deem advisable,the authority so delegated to remain in full force and effect in accordance with the terms of the delegation;and that any two of the President,the Executive Vice Presidents and Senior - Vice Presidents, acting jointly, are authorized to revoke in writing the authority of said designated person or persons. Subdelegation by Executive Vice President Michael Rowe and President Charles K.Barbo,effective upon signature below Authority to sign leases with tenants for business parks and commercial spaces at self-storage facilities with rental terms of 5 years or less(including extensions at othe 's option)and rental amount not toe a 000, is hereby delegated to any opera' g V' "esid • By: By: e?.-4/ Michael Rowe Charles K.Barbo — Executive Vice President President I Z ?Y y, Date: � ����� Date: / j:Vegallbaardlbpledel western® July 3, 1997 1 1 wireless Jennifer Henning City of Renton,Planning Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Landscape Plan for Western Wireless Shurgard site Dear Ms. Henning: This letter is in regard to the landscape plan associated with our submittal for a wireless communications facility located at the Shurgard Storage site. As you can see from the plans no landscaping is proposed,however we do want to provide landscaping in conformance with the City's Wireless Telecommunications Ordinance. Our reason for not showing landscaping on the plans was our desire to work with staff to provide the best design possible. If we were to adhere to the strict wording of the ordinance virtually all of the landscaping would be inside of the Shurgard Storage fence and would be of little benefit to the neighborhood. Alternatively, if we were to locate the landscaping outside of the fence a more aesthetically pleasing design could be achieved. Finally, it may be decided that an in-lieu of fee be paid to the Parks Dept. to provide landscaping in the City right-of-way or some other creative approach in order to provide good landscaping where the neighborhood will truly benefit. I look forward to working with you to achieve the very best design possible. Please let me know when we can get together and work on a landscape plan that truly meets the spirit of Renton's Wireless Telecommunications Ordinance. Sincerely,V-;1:1 Kirk Vinish, AICP Senior Zoning Analyst RECEW E :J .j 1997 w..F•.. xJ DEVELOP,vlENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON Western Wireless Corporation 330 120th Avenue NE,#110 Bellevue,WA 98005 FAX(206) 451-4739 FAX (206) 451-7987 :.s.°.. 0 3 1997 PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON Western Wireless is seeking an Administrative Conditional Use Permit to build a 85-foot tall,structure to support an antenna array. The array includes 9 panel antennas which are approximately 5.5' long and 6" wide and 3" deep. They come in a neutral color and can be painted, along with the pole, to suit the requirements of the City of Renton. The support structure is made of galvanized steel and will be placed on a metal grate and located in the southeast corner of the Shurgard Storage lot. The communications facility includes four equipment cabinets similar in size and shape to tall file cabinets. Construction will last approximately two weeks and the hours of construction being consistent with the City of Renton's standards for construction. In conformance with the City of Renton Municipal Code and as a matter of corporate policy, Western Wireless uses support structures which are designed for the purpose of collocation by other carriers. PROPOSAL SUMMARY: • COLLOCATABLE SUPPORT STRUCTURE 85-FEET IN HEIGHT • 4 EQUIPMENT CABINETS (SIMILAR TO FILE CABINETS) • 20 BY 20-FOOT LEASED AREA ENCLOSED BY SECURED 6-FOOT FENCE ADMINISTRATIVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST AN ADMINISTRATIVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 85-FOOT HIGH SUPPORT STRUCTURE AND A 9-PANEL ANTENNA ARRAY LOCATED IN A COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL (CA) ZONE. City of Renton Municipal Code 4-31-36.0 Conditional Use Decision Criteria RZC 4-31-36.C.1 "The Comprehensive Plan - The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan,program, map or ordinance" Western Wireless' proposal is consistent with the City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan. The plan notes on page V-43, "When new antenna structures are required for the cell site, monopoles or lattice structures are often utilized. Monopoles generally range in height from 60 feet to 150 feet. " Our proposal is consistent with this statement in that our monopole will be 85 feet high. The Comprehensive Plan's discussion of monopoles continues by saying, "Monopoles are generally more aesthetically acceptable, but changes in the system such as lowering antennas is not possible without major changes. " The proposed facility is a monopole capable of accommodating two wireless carriers. 2 RCZ 4-31-36.C.2 "Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location... The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. b. That the proposed use is suited for the proposed site." According to the Consumer Electronics Manufactures Association (1996) the most important reasons customers cited for purchasing a wireless phone were as follows: Able to communicate in an emergency 46% Be more available away from home or office 28% Protect your personal safety 12% Be able to make calls when in a rush 4% Other . 6% Additionally, Peter D. Hart Research Associates (March 1997) found in their research that 70% of wireless users say that cost per minute and monthly charges for their service were extremely important points when selecting a wireless service. Western Wireless entry into the Washington market will have a positive competitive impact on pricing of wireless services. While other wireless providers use this site they are mounted on the roof of Shurgard's building. Our additional antenna will not result in a concentration or detrimental affect on this part of Renton. Our service design is similar in nature to our competitors and therefore it is likely that we will choose similar locations. However, there does not appear to be any evidence to show that we will be detrimental in any way to any part of the City of Renton. The site is a fully developed commercial enterprise providing storage facilities to the public. The site is highly commercial in appearance and use and is therefore very suitable for this proposed use as demonstrated by other wireless carriers also siting at this location. 3 RCZ 4-31-36.C.2 "Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue effects on adjacent property." The site is well suited for this type of use in that it is far removed from residences. None of the surrounding land uses will be detrimentally affected by the operation of a antenna array at this site. Adjacent properties already experience the effects from Shurgard Storage, a commercial enterprise. The additional use at this site will not have any further effect on neighboring properties beyond what they are already experiencing. The principal effect on neighboring properties will be visual. This impact has been minimized to the extent possible in that a monopole as opposed to a lattice tower is proposed. The area of the site chosen for the monopole is ai far from adjacent residential land uses as possible. RCZ 4-31-36.C.4 "Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood." The proposed facility is not located in an area of the City that is used or zoned for residential use. The character of the neighborhood is commercial and this proposal is a commercial enterprise. RCZ 4-31-36.C.5 "Parking..." No additional parking is proposed. The facility is unmanned and will be briefly visited by a technician once a month. RCZ 4-31-36.C.6 "Traffic..." The proposed facility should have no traffic impacts in that the facility is unmanned and will be briefly visited by a technician once a month. 4 RCZ 4-31-36.C.7 "Noise, Glare: Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse areas." The facility will have a small fan (not an air conditioning unit) which will generate very little noise. Noise levels will be well below the City of Renton's maximum permissible noise levels. The monopole will be painted with a none glare finish arid we will be pleased to paint the facility any color desired by the City of Renton. RCZ 4-31-36.C.8 "Landscaping..." No landscaping is proposed in that the proposed location on the Shurgard property does not lend itself to landscaping. Additional site area would be consumed with little benefit in that the entire Shurgard property is surrounded by a chain link fence. RCZ 4-31-36.C.9 "Accessory Uses..." No accessory uses are part of this proposal. RCZ 4-31-36.C.10 "Conversion..." No existing building or structure conversion is being proposed. 5 RCZ 4-31-36.C.11 "Public Improvements: 'The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities, and services..." The site is fully serviced by public services. No additional services beyond that which already serve the site Should be necessary. Therefore, there should be no impact to public improvements or services. Additional Conditional Use Criteria per Ordinance 4260. 4-38-14.B "Conditional Use Criteria: The governing authority shall consider the following factors in determining whether to issue a conditional use permit, although the governing authority may waive or reduce the burden on the applicant of one or more of these criteria if the governing authority, concludes that goals of this ordinance are better served." 4-38-14.B.1 "Height of the proposed tower." The proposed tower is 85 feet high which is the maximum permitted height for this zone under the requirements of the Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance. Any lower height would significantly impair the ability to operate this facility and would result in the proliferation of more monopole facilities in the City of Renton. 6 • • • • 4-38-14.B.2 "Proximity of the tower to residential structures and residential district boundaries." The proposed tower is 85 feet high which is the maximum permitted height for this zone under the requirements of the Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance. Any lower height would significantly impair the ability to operate this facility and could result in the proliferation of more monopole facilities in the City of Renton in order to acquire adequate coverage. 4-38-14.B.3 "Nature of uses on adjacent and nearby properties." According to City of Renton zoning staff all adjacent properties are zoned Commercial Arterial (CA). Presently, adjacent uses are either commercial or the property is vacant and unused. 4-38-14.B.4 "Surrounding Topography" East along N.E. 48t'' Street the elevation increases sharply. West the elevation drops towards I-405. Areas north and south of the property are of a similar elevation however some distance north of the site the elevation begins to increase. Due to the sharp increase in elevation to the east the monopole needs to be 85 feet high. 4-38-14.B.5 "Surrounding tree coverage and foliage." Significant stands of trees exist east of the site. Further north of the site, trees and foliage exists and may provide some limited screening for properties north. South and west of the site very few trees exist to provide . • screening. The residential properties most likely affected by this site are east and they will enjoy substantial screening due to existing trees immediately adjacent to the east. 4-38-14.B.7 "Proposed ingress and egress" The Shurgard site is fully developed and presently has ingress and egress via S.E. 76th Street. No alteration to the present access is proposed and the facility should not affect neighboring properties access to their sites. 4-38-14.B.8 "Potential noise, light and glare.impacts." A small fan (not an air-conditioning unit) will be installed in the cabinet containing the communications equipment. The fan will emit noise well below the City of Renton's maximum permitted noise limit. The facility will be painted with a none glare paint. No portion of the facility should emit glare. 4-38-14.B.9 "Availability of suitable existing towers and other structures" As a matter of corporate policy Western Wireless always seeks to collocate antennas with other carriers or use existing structures. In doing so our costs are considerably reduced and as evidenced by the City of Renton's zoning code, collocation is usually the preferred option among local jurisdictions. Unfortunately we were unable to find an existing structure or tower in this area for our use. While this site contain antennas for other wireless carriers, we are unable to use the existing structures since they do not provide sufficient height. There are no available structures or towers in the immediate vicinity which would be able to provide sufficient height to meet our needs. 8 4-38-18.1 "No existing towers or structures are located within the geographic area required to meet applicant's engineering requirements." The attached letter from Western\Wireless' engineering division explains the geographical area being served and the lack of existing support structures for our antennas. As mentioned previously as a matter of corporate policy Western Wireless always seeks to collocate antennas with other carriers or use existing structures. Using structures at their present height within this geographical area would certainly have required the proliferation of antennas and monopole structures. 9 _/ - 4IV . OI '•; '1 COv • !.,t I50 3r---; 0f 3 i37 ❑ cn ❑ O I C ``\ \`. \`�' ,//I QvJ .\ D CORPORATE W a o �0 n • .. / , -.- /,/ O—1 c // 1r-^ . i6o // `,C' 1f m It • � • �' 2)v (2) Oa Q • - of loo i 283.93 , m , ❑ _ 65' * x• 1 / I`I ' 1 lir S.P 182082 - j fr. II - N1 '� 32925 I 165 0 f'I65 ❑ l=r . .. 33C 1 •• ••••••..,� —1 iIS 0 SE 767 ik, ,4,2) I 330 Ell . J 82 63.10 r .:; 124.90 N SO I -8N 1 60 ` rrS ii0*it;i N 1' -' . ' 60 ` (2) lF h L- I - 2 W 14 N i6 17 i''' ❑ 83 ( r 145 35 45e9 3 1 w./ m 165 1s0 J t2 3 13 `-,`° 21 N 'I ' iv. "".1 MMMIMRr4 Zt'` 1. IBA.-_Tj' 167 J 194_ A,,,,;-,- '16•>2 ---------- ,- '^ II �IO2 C r 0_ r �j J 165 I� -' -- _—_—-1• I I b i6'.68 e ti 6 = 10 �A�o \'Oo 1 3 't G� 157.92 S.55( rs� 5.69; 5`�. ,may �\y�q c$ 7 r, ^4 100�,/� 27 'r' 'i,• i. I o°Do ct c.f. v a N o (I) r oo — `n , „ IV.I Q[I ` ISO _ ge'6,3 ,0 g C3 ., 6C ?1 S. Alt S.ii4P. 485069 I� RENTON cry 8 m Bo 7.7 9 �' 28 • 4/ii/ i.329.29 l r.—IS0- `Q I62.4' , 142.513 (� 0 �1�L3.f—i..� O o �... l20 79 , 184 183 ��i1 1 ' \;4 i__, �11 . , I W • 9 co :... - ' ...---: 1 k 0 I (11E) ..‘ ,,,..„....„, .,_, i Q HD I Cam, i. ` 7 z� o\'' " 1Z�-1,66 165 > iT, {1 (3) \\, ,t, .\ , �,N^ w '' ��79 I,- r \ II ')` h f-^: 1384b Z� 0 2 1 l 4 .. I 5 It (2) O ‘‘ i _ , • �0 2,,1 , S P. 011-87 - ,% D it � I 5 _CV i I Z u L 1 !;_I `/ 40, i414y/ o =--250 = _ — a o 3 = = = /•"-29- NF° -4- Rf1— • ST - — • • • NF — • — • apron . _ , -.D1 4 • CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF CONSTRUCTION AND LAND USE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Shurgard Storage, SE 3-411-A 2. Name of applicant: Western PCS BTA Development Corporation 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Contact Person &Applicant Susie Anderson Western Wireless 330 120th Avenue NE,Suite 110 Bellevue,WA 98005 Phone: (206)465-9056 Fax: (206)451-7987 4. Date checklist prepared: July 10, 1997 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable): Immediate construction when approved. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, of further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Department of Health review and approval. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Renton Administrative Conditional Use Permit NOISING N1a11�S L661 U I -Inc . 6610 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the site of the project./ There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Installation of an 85 foot-high antenna support structure0. The structure will support an antenna array consisting of three(3)antenna sectors with four(4)panel antennas at each sector. These sectors will be located inside an existing penthouse on the roof of the existing building. Signal processing equipment will be placed inside the existing penthouse as well. 12. Location ofthe proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Site address: 1755 NE 48th Renton, WA 98056 A legal description and site plan accompany the application for this project. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a.. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? Less than 10%. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Asphalt covers most of the site and little soil exists. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose,type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No fill or grading is required. 2 f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction or use? If so, generally describe. No. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Asphalt covers most of the site currently. The percentage of the site covered with impervious surfaces will not increase significantly after project construction. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. None anticipated. 2. Air a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Light vehicular traffic during construction. One trip for maintenance each month. No air emissions from project itself. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None necessary. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Does not apply. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Does not apply. 3 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose and approximate quantities if known. No. 5 Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood lain? If so, note location on the site plan. P PP No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste and materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No waste materials are generated or disposed of on the site. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any(for example: Domestic sewage; industrial,containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. No waste material is produced by this proposal. No waste or sanitary sewage service is required because the site is not staffed. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The runoff source will be existing paved surfaces, with the water flowing to existing storm drains. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No waste materials will be generated at this site. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground or runoff water impacts, if any: None anticipated. 4 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: x deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other x evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other x shrubs grass crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None. 5. Animals a: Circle (underline)any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: x _ mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon,trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. 5 • 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil,wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrical energy will be used for operation of radios, computers, and to exhaust excess heat in peak operation periods. Backup batteries will be used for emergency power. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. There are no known health hazards associated with personal communications technology. PCS operates at a frequency between 1850-1930 Mhz and at very low power. None of the 6,000 studies of electromagnetic fields conducted over the past 40 years have identified any health risks associated with this type of low power, ultra high frequency signal. Wireless PCS antennas are many times below the federal standards for maximum exposure to radiofrequency energy. The project application includes a determination from the Department of Public Health that the proposal complies with the City's radiofrequency energy requirements. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. - 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Operation will be kept at low power,per operation license. b. Noise. 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? None. 6 • I . 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. No long-term noise impacts. During construction there could be short-term construction traffic and related noises during daytime hours. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: • None required. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. VVhat is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The current designated use of the site is Center Suburban(CS.) b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. The site contains a storage facility and an adjacent parking lot. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The current zoning classification of the site is Center Suburban(CS.) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? None. g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Site is not within the Shoreline District. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an"environmentally sensitive"area? If so, specify. No. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and project land uses and plans, if any: The proposal complies with all City zoning regulations and comprehensive plans. Please refer to attached site plans. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle or low-income housing. Does not apply. b. Approximately how many unites, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle or low-income housing. Does not apply. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Does not apply. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No views from the surrounding properties will be altered or obstructed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The antennas will be screened by the existing trees and the associated equipment will be screened by a 6foot-high fence. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. 8 c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Matching non-glare,flat paint will be used on the antennas and equipment. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None noted. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe the proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Please see attached site plans. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Public transit is available in proximity to the site. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Does not apply. 9 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If know, indicate when peak volumes would occur. One maintenance trip per month. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. None. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, healthcare, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct,impacts on public services, if any. Site and equipment are monitored for fire, hazard and unauthorized entry 24-hours per day at an off-site central monitoring station. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas,water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in immediate vicinity which might be needed. The proposed utility is a wireless communication facility consisting of nine(9)panel antennas. The general construction activities will comply with the standards established by the City of Renton Zoning Code and will include installation of the support structure and antenna array and monitoring of the site. 10 o , C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signatu • Date submitted: 17 tie 97 This checklist was reviewed by: Any comments or changes made by the Department are entered in the body of the checklist and contain the initials of the reviewer. 11 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 07/03/97 13 :54 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9704244 Amount: 1, 005 . 12 07/03/97 13 : 54 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #2083 WESTERN PC Init: LN Project #: LUA97-092 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 334330-1125 Site Address: 1755 NE 48TH ST Total Fees : 1, 005 . 12 This Payment 1, 005 . 12 Total ALL Pmts: 1, 005 . 12 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0006 Conditional Use Fees 1, 000 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 .90 .42 . 1 Postage 5 . 12 RECEWFr JUL (3 3 1997 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON