HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA77-061BEGINNING
OF FILE
FILE TITLE
ROMs ED
SA 10 mop
77
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON ,
WASHINGTON, ON SEPTEMBER 6 1977 , AT. 9 : b0 A. M. X XX)OMIDZ*
1X 10 XFXO(LXIXOaKD(N(IX XFXH(1KD(1KD((XtXa x AND 1 : 30 P. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWINGPETITIONS :
TO BE AT 9 : 00 A. M. :
1 . LOUIS G . MALESIS , REZONE FROM R- 1 Tb RL1 ,file No .
R-064-77 ; property located between 417 , 'nd 425 Wells
Avenue South .
2. MALIBU GRAND PRIX CORP. , REZONE FROM GS11 TO B-1 ;
file No R-065-77 ; property located ,'bet een S. W. Grady
Way and ' FAI-405 , adjacent to and east of Oakesdale
Avenue S . W.
3. MALIBU GRAND PRIX CORP . , SPECIAL PERMIT TO DEVELOP
MIDGET CAR DRIVING SKILL FACILITY; file No . Sp-067-77 ;
property located between S . W. GradylWaifiand FAI-405
between Oakesdale Avenue S . W. and Thomas Avenue S . W.
4 . ENVIRONMENTAL _RESEARCH; AND DEVELOPMENT,. ORP . (CRESTVIEW
MANOR NQ. 1 ) , APPLICATION FOR 10-LOT PRELIMINARY PLAT
APPROVAL , WAIVER OF OFF=S TE IM ROVEMENtS , .AND EXCEPTION
TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE RE . CUL DEISAC STREET LENGTH ;files PP-068-77 , W-070-77 , and E-0694.77 ; property
locat,edton Blaine Avenue N. E. between N. E. 14th and
N . E. 12th Streets .
TO BE HELD AT 1 : 30 P. M. :
x 5 . DUANE A. WELLS , REZONE , FROM G TO M=Pi FILE No R-072-77 ,
andIDJANE A. WELLS AND VAL BAIN , APP4ICA ION FOR SITE
APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT OFFICE AND LABORATORY BUILDING
IN d (O-P) ZONE, file No SA-061-77 ; 'lrOperty located
at th southwest corner of Lind Averlie S . W. and
S. W. 10th Street.
Legal descriptions of all applications noted above are on fileintheRentonPlanningDepartment.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 6 , 1977 1 AT 9 : 00 A . M. XTA
XXXXXXXXX'XI X12XI41PX IX AXX AND 1 : 30 P. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS .
GORDON Y . ERICKSEN
PUBLISHED August 26 , 1977 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR
CERTIFICATION
Michael L. Smith HEREBY CER1?iFY1THAT THREE COPIES
OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE pQNSRICUOUS PLACES
ON THE PROPERTY 'DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . '
ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn J
to before e, a Notary Public ,
on the Z3 day of A vsir
1911 SIGNED
JTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON ,
WASHINGTON , ON AUGUST 30 1977 , AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER
THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS :
aii) c.;q- W'71
1 . DUANE A. WELLS AND VAL BAIN , APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL
TO CONSTRUCT OFFICE AND LABORATORY BUILDING IN M-P ZONE ,
file No . SA-061-77 ; property located at Lind Avenue S .W .
and Tenth Avenue S .W.
2 . GARY MERLINO , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND
GRADE IN L-1 ZONE , file No . SP-062-77 ; property located
at 2900 East Valley Road .
3 . THE AUSTIN COMPANY , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO
FILL AND GRADE IN H-1 ZONE , file No . SP-063-77 ; property
located between Lind Avenue 'S .W. and Raymond Avenue S .W .
on the south side of S . W. 16th Street.
Legal descriptions of all applications noted above are on file
in the Renton Planning Department.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 30 , 1977 AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO
EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS .
GORDON Y . ERICKSEN
PUBLISHED August 19 , 1977 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR
CERTIFICATION
I , MICHAEL L . SMITH HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES
OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES
ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW .
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn
to before me , a Notary Public ,
on the kbA4t day of S; 3 j
19 T-r . SIGNED
kx\A i\ • \- . ;
IN"
o THE CITY ,OF RENTON
ig
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE:SO.:RENTON, WASH. 98055
p CHARLES J. DELAURENTI ', MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING. EXAMINER'
L. RICK .REELER , 235=2593
gED SEP1 °
September 30, 1977
Members, Renton City Council RE: File No. R-072-77.'.
Renton., Washington
Dear Council Members:
The appeal period for the, attached 'rezone request expired on
September 26, 1977, and we.:are transmitting. .copies of the Examiner's,
recommendation, dated September 12, 1977, for your review prior to
adoption of an ordinance.
We •request that you include the attached".with your Council material,: ..;; :','
for the...Council meeting of October 10 1977.
If you desire additional information regarding the-subject.application, : :
please contact the office of tkie Hearing Examiner:
Sinc ely.;' )
L. Rick Beeler
Hearing Examiner
LRB:
cc: ,'Del Mead, City Clerk
Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
CITY of:RENT , • %{. •
r-
L
pF R.
h.
w • y`p...,',-:.cx THE CITY. OF RENTON
z® Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
z
l
o
o q '' "CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR ® LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
p L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593
TfO SEP1 -
September 30, 1977
Mr. Duane A. Wells . RE: File No. R-072-77
15 South Grady Way SA-061-77
Renton, WA 98055
Dear Mr. Wells:
This is to notify you that the above referenced requests, which
were approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's
report of September 12, 1977, have not been appealed within the
time period set by ordinance, and therefore, this application is
considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk for
transmittal to the City Council for final approval.
You will receive notification of final approval upon adoption of
an ordinance by the City Council.
Sincerely, ,
I ;;_ii!i'
a1
L. Rick Beeler
Hearing Examiner
LRB:mp
Cc: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
Del Mead, City Clerk
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
State of Washington)
County of King
Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon
oath disposes and states:
That on the 12th day of September 19 77 , of f cant
deposited in .the mails of the United States a sealed envelope
containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid,
addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled
application or petition.
r
7
Subscribed and sworn this \ z day of
19 1.1 .
r\.k\)\1,.'‹ -\[}1
Notary Public in and for the State
of Washington, residing at Renton
Application, Petition or Case: Duane A. Wells & Val Bain, R-072-77. SA-061-77
The mLnwtea contain a tat os the paAtiez ob necond)
3^.
September 12, 1977
OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL.
APPLICANT: Duane A. Wells and Val Bain FILE NO. R-072-77
SA-061-77
LOCATION:. Property located at the southwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W.
and S.W. 10th Street on the old Burlington Northern Right-
of-Way and Puget Sound Power Line Right-of-Way located
between Grady Way and S.W. 10th Street.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests approval of rezone from G to M-P and
Site Plan approval of a proposed office/laboratory facility
to be located on a site consisting of the proposed rezone
area together with the existing M-P (Manufacturing Park)
zoning. One hundred twenty parking stalls are also proposed
in conjunction with the facility as per the City's Parking
and Loading Ordinance requirements together with various
landscaping areas around the perimeter and interior of the
site.
SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval with conditions.
RECOMMENDATION:
Hearing Examiner: Approval with conditions.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the
REPORT:Examiner on August 30, 1977.
PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining
available information on file with the application, and
field checking the property and surrounding area, the
Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as
follows:
The hearing was opened on September 6, 1977 at 3:45 p.m. in the Council Chambers of
the Renton Municipal Building.
Parties wishing to testify were sworn.
It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed
the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1.
Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following
additional exhibits into the record:
Exhibit #2: Assessor's Map
Exhibit #3: Site Plan with Building Elevations
In response to the Examiner's inquiry regarding grading accomplished on the site, Mr.
Smith indicated that a building permit allowing grading may have been issued during a
previous application request in September of 1976.
The Examiner inquired about building corners jutting into parking areas designated on
Exhibit #3. Discussion ensued regarding possible alternatives to protect corners
including proposed landscaping or architectural revisions to the building plan.
The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was:
Duane A. Wells
15 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Mr. Wells reported that he did not concur with Page 5, Item 6 of Exhibit #1 relative
to provision of suitable utilities and off-site improvements. He indicated that with
provision of sewer and water along 10th Avenue, an extension on Lind Avenue was
unnecessary and not applicable to a rezone or site plan approval request. With the
exception of this item the applicant concurred with Exhibit #1.
1
P
f
R-072-77 Page Two
SA-061-77
The Examiner inquired about proposed landscaping. The applicant indicated that a
landscape plan had been pending on the issuance of the Planning Department report on
the application.
In response to the Examiner's inquiry about jutting building corners, Mr. Wells reported
that an architectural review would be made of the matter.
Regarding Item 6 of Exhibit #1, Mr. Smith directed Mr. Wells to. coordinate the matter
with• representatives of the Utilities Division, and reported that a comment regarding
a 12-inch water main had been made •on Exhibit #3 by the Utilities Division at the time
of application review. The Examiner labeled the duplicate site plan with Utilities
Division comments as Exhibit #4.
The Examiner asked for further comments in support or opposition of the application.
There was no response.
The Examiner asked Mr. Smith for additions, corrections or modifications to Exhibit #1.
Mr. Smith added a comment relating to previous discussion regarding corners of
buildings to be reviewed by an architect.
The Examiner noted that a change of policy by public utilities had occurred with
purchase of the property easement from Puget Sound Power and Light Company. Mr. Smith
indicated that policies of public utilities were currently more flexible, although
the subject application represented the first construction project within the
easement. Discussion ensued regarding future access problems on Grady Way and it was
agreed that careful review would be made of future applications for proper access.
Mr. Wells'' reported •that a valid 180-day building permit had been issued for the current
grading of the site in June, 1977 for the preload operation. Mr. Smith indicated that
the current building permit would have been attached to the previous permit of
September, 1976.
The Examiner asked for further testimony. Since there was none, the hearing on
Item #R-072-77 and SA-061-77 was closed by the Examiner at 4:15 p.m.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter,
the Examiner now makes and enters the following:
1. The request is for approval of a reclassification from G to M-P and site plan
approval of an office/laboratory facility at the southwest corner of Lind Avenue
S.W. and S.W. 10th Street.
2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies
and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter,
and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this refort by reference
as set forth in full therein.
3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental
Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance
has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official.
4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the
impact of this development and no adverse comment was expressed.
5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed.
6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity.
7. The proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, lot coverage and height
requirements of Section 4-730(M-P) and Chapter 22 (Parking and Loading) of
Title IV and a Board of Adjustment variance of August 18, 1977.
8. A setback variance was approved by the Board of Adjustment on August 18, 1977 to
allow the building to be. constructed 52 feet from the right-of-way of S.W. Grady Way.
9. The King County Hydraulics Division has not approved the Flood Zone Control Permit
for the proposal.
10. Grading of the site has begun in connection with an existing building permit for
another building previously intended for the site.
11. A landscape plan was not submitted to satisfy zoning requirements and Soil
Conservation requirements per Resolution No. 1923 for 2% wildlife habitat mitigation.
k
R-072-77 Page Three
SA-061-77
12. The proposed site plan, Exhibit #3, indicates that the northwest and southeast
corner of the building protrude into the parking lot without protection via curbs
and/or landscaping.
13. The site lies at the southern border of the Earlington Manufacturing Park. Along
the southern border of the site is S.W. Grady Way. No access is provided to
S.W. Grady Way.
14. This ;application represents the initial occurrence, of development in this general
area abutting the north side of S.W. Grady Way and utilizing the Puget Sound Power
and Light Company right-of-way for parking. That portion of the utility right-of-
way is included in the rezone; the applicant has purchased the right-of-way and
granted the utility an easement. A precedent may be established in this
application for similar future development in this area along the north side of
S.W. Grady Way.
15. The majority of the site is currently zoned M-P.
16. Final grading of the site must meet the requirements of Chapter 23, Mining,
Excavation and Grading Ordinance.
17. Outside waste receptacles are not featured in the site plan, Exhibit #3.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The proposed rezone and site plan generally comply with the goals and objectives
of the Comprehensive Plan, and conditions are required for complete compliance
Section 4-3014(B) ) .
2. This site clearly is physically oriented to the Earlington Industrial Park (M-P)
to the north and across S.W. 10th Street. Access will be to S.W. 10th Street and
not S.W. Grady Way. The building grade elevation will be several feet below
S.W. Grady Way. These physical factors make this site somewhat unique from other
similarly located properties along the north side of S.W. Grady Way.
3. Per Resolution No. 1923, 2% of the site must be devoted to wildlife habitat .
landscaping. Such landscaping must be located on site and should incorporate
landscaping in the adjacent public right-of-way. The Planning Department files
contain guidelines for implementing the landscaping requirements of the Soil
Conservation Service which the applicant and Planning Department can satisfactorily
use to develop a final landscape plan for that department's approval.
4. A Flood Zone Control Permit is essential from the King County Hydraulics Division
which will utilize the Examiner's decision in its review of the permit.
5. Those portions of the building which protrude into paved parking and access areas
should be protected by landscaping and/or curbing. A final site plan incorporating
this revision can be satisfactorily reviewed and approved by the Planning Department.
6. This site lies within. the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan area, and
consequently, the final drainage plan should adhere to the applicable goals and
objectives.
RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the record, testimony and evidence submitted in the public
hearing, it is recommended by the Examiner to the City Council that the requested
application be approved subject to:
1. Submittal by the applicant and approval by the Planning Department of a final
landscape plan in compliance with Resolution No. 1923 and incorporating the adjacent
public right-of-ways.
2. Submittal by the applicant and approval by the Public Works Department of a final
storm water drainage plan and final utilities and off-site improvements plan.
3. Submittal by the applicant and approval by the Planning Department and Public Works
Department of the slope stabilization to be compatible with and complement the
aforementioned final landscape plan.
4. Submittal by the applicant and approval by the Planning Department of the final
site plan incorporating protection from vehicles of the corners of the buildings
protruding into parking and access areas.
I j
R-072-77 Page Four
SA-061-77
5. Submittal by the applicant and approval by the King County Hydraulics Division of
the Flood Zone Control Permit.
ORDERED THIS 12th day of September, 1977.
r
L. Rick Beeler
Land Use Hearing Examiner
TRANSMITTED THIS 12th day of September, 1977 by Affidavit of Mailing to the
parties of record:
Duane A. Wells
TRANSMITTED THIS 12th day of September, 1977 to the following:
Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti
Council President George J. Perry
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director
Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
Ron Nelson, Building Division
Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney
Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration
must be filed in writing on or before September 26, 1977. Any aggrieved person
feeling that'the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of
law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be
reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by
the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This
request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the
Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper.
An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires
that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00
and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available
for inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, or same may be
purchased at cost in said office.
N• 474. . •'..* . t:-.1.11;4.%.,::'V .".1 1
7't,Ir I
r
ri •
N. PI 77 r
i
r
N t
i
OP
D
L-I .
43tei.,:..„, ..-- r,11 .. •. .,
I. .01041,;,...1..
0,....; .
1 1- ! "
til,:i .;, -VA „, • .
I 11. I1 7 7 40.IL ii
rt
a ra A , , a.. 15"..Int ' t
g_ „
y
G GrfQ00 Gay
G-t600 I I : •• k$S.~Ii
GS-I '
I°' , i • n a,
I' A L , --I' },r+ ID . ;q 0 . '„,, •P 4 ..
t
1
W IDrw 57 *
1
4 • . 4 I
I in i i, 1 \i.I-1 - i.4
REZONE APPLICATION : ' G ' TO M-P ; SITE PLAN APPROVAL
DUANE ..A• • WELLS ANDVAL BAIN :• Appl , .No . R-072-77 , and Appl . - No_ SA=061-77 ; .
Proper'ty located. at the.southwest corner of, Lin'd Avenue S . W. and S . W .
loth Street- on the old Burlington Northern Right-of-Way and Puget Sound
Power Right-'of-Way' located between S . W. Grady Way and S . W. lOth Street
APPLICANT DUANE A. WELLS AND VAL BAIN TOTAL AREA ± 1 . 56 acres
PRINCIPAL ACCESS S. W. 10th Street
EXISTING ZONIN( M-P , Manufacturing Park' and G , General Classificatior
EXISTING USE Undeveloped
PROPOSED USE Office/laborato.ry facility
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Man'ufacturinq Park
COMMENTS
i Iy
MLA
4 3
h *
1 i
Aisiop r
a 04
fie 1 '
off'
I I
OM
s
b M a ,.
CHC!!
T,l!rIr
1:![1410 II 110,„„000.
114 i
alp 4 lili IP0Ip•IF:1, 0 0 11 0 "
01011
1I
I , 0 4 •I
ii
CI
a ° a I 0
in i illo illi 00 lirr
cipScalSt lay t00
ouI Jia' 04
iis sows 4 'vA . pAoi
o. AA ovs-:r
4I
FE"! NT
iv-\ n(M- I' \
Affidavit of Publication
pu,
31. -oil
w
STATE OF WASHINGTON At, .-.""
COUNTY OF KING ss.
a r.l''..c r.C.t...gtlr:J.a.Ug'.h. being first duly sworn on i;4: I•;,HE OF
I1`".' PUBLIC HEARING: '
with,deposes and says that..She is the Chie.f...C.lsrk of RENTON LAND USE •
t „FARING EXAMINER
1'I I1•: RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) RENTON,V11ASH1NGTONtimesaweek.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and RE
PUBLIC HEARINGhasbeenformorethansixmonthspriortothedateofpublicationreferred
to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- i WILL,BE HELD BY:THE
paper published four (4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, RENTON' LAND .USE
and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained HEARING EXAMINER 'AT
at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton 1 'f HIS REGULAR MEETING'
Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the t IN.THE COUNCIL CHAM-
Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, i BERS,';CITY HALL, RE-i
NTON,,WASHINGTON,ON•
t SEPTEMBER 6, 1977,•AT
Washington.That the annexed isa...TQ.t.t.C......O...F.ubh -c 9:00 A.M.AND 1:30 P.M.TO
CONSIDER THE FOLLOW-:
Bering
ING PETITIONS: • ..
TO';BE HELD AT 9:00
as it was published in regular issues(and 1. LOUIS G...MALESIS,
REZONE FROM R-1:,TOnotinsupplementformofsaidnewspaper) once each issue for a period file No. R-064-77;
isroperty Ideated between.';
417 and 425 Wells Avenue.;
of 1. consecutive issues,commencing on the I "' t?HSouth..+ •'• '1'•`••
2,:MALIBU GRAND PRIX'.
ICORP i;REZONE FROM.6....day of , L).US.t 19..7.7... and the GS TO H-?;'•tile•No..,g i , 1- t ,
I R-065-7;.;P'roperty: o=•+
1 cateii betwioen S.W.Grady
of 19
Ii.Way?''anii'FAI-405, adla-'.'
day both dates 4•Cent to and east of Oakes-,•
inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- t fdale Avenue S.W. :,
scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee e 3. fNALIBUGRAND PRIX+::
WCORP.;-SPECIAL' PER
charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $.4.2...Q9which MIT• TO DEVELOP'
has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the I ., a MIDGET A CAR DRIVING
first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent I
SKILL FACILITY: file Na
insertion. I
SP-067-77;:Property
sated between SW.Grady
Way end FAI-405 between/ . QI. 1 ;, : ,OakesdaleAvenue S.W.;,:
and Thomas Avenue S.W.
Chief Clerk I4.ENVIRONMENTAL RE=:
I;:, EE SEARCH AND" DE- .:
VELOPMENT CORP.,
26 i• i(CRESTVIEW_MANOR
Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of NO. 1), APPLICATION
I FOR 10 LOT PRELIMI-
A U(Z US t 19 77 NARY PLAT APPROVAL,
1 WAIVER OF OFF-SITE
IMPROVEMENTS, AND
7 i( .;t;l'T 1 EXCEPTION TO SUB-
Notary Public Ti and for t c State of Wa3 Ington, DIVISION ORDINANCE
residing at Kent, K,i g County.RE. CUL DE SAC
STREET LENGTH: files
PP-068-77, W-070-77,
and E-069-77;property Io-
Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June sated on Blaine Avenue
9th, 1955. N.E. between N.E. 14th
and N.E. 12th Streets.
Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures,TO BE HELD AT 1:30 P.M.:
adopted by the newspapers of the State. 5.DUANE A.WELLS,RE-
ZONE FROM G TO M-P,
FILE No. R-072-77, and
DUANE A. WELLS AND
VAL BAIN,APPLICATION
FOR SITE APPROVALTO
V.P.C.Form No.e7
CONSTRUCT OFFICE
AND LABORATORY
BUILDING IN G(M-P)
ZONE,file No.SA-061-77;
property located at the
southwest corner of Lind
Avenue S.W. and S.W.
10th Street.
Legal descriptions of all
applications noted above
are on file in the Renton,.
Planning Department
ALL INTERESTED
PERSONS TO SAID PETI-
TIONS ARE INVITED TO:
BE PRESENT AT THE:
PUBLIC HEARING ON
SEPTEMBER 6, 1977 AT
9:00 A.M. AND 1:30 TO
EXPRESS THEIR OPI-
NIONS.
GORDON Y. ERICKSEN
RENTON PLANNING
DIRECTOR
Published in the Renton
Record-Chronicle August'
r:
26, 1977. R4520
CITY OF RENTON R_r ED
APPLICATION JUL 19 1977
SITE APPROVAL
4,
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 4\
File No. SA- DLO / fr7 / Filing Date 9 77
CO
Application Fee $ I/o• Receipt No . p7:
I/G06 7/
9/77
Environmental Review Fee $ Ad,-7, /407. I/
9 i7
APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 :
1 . Name J41.94/ 1J,6LLS / /-'/5'L C3/9//Phone ZS SS=/25 3
Address /S- Sn C74!/9.i2Y `--Ji9 I/5/
2 . Property location //. 2 .9/-'L= .S. '-J ,A/d Si S - h .
3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary)
4 . Number of acres or square feet e(ANVO SP ,r Present zoning
5 . What do you propose to develop on this property?
L 19/ 1861//- 2'/,V
6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application :
A. Site and access plan (include setbacks ,
Scale
existing structures , easements , and other
factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 '
B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 '
C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning
on adjacent parcels)1" = 200 ' to 800 '
D. Building height and area (existing and proposed)
7 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION :
Date Approved
Date Denied
Date Appealed
Appeal Action
Remarks
Planning D t.
Revs . 1-7 7
4
I.
I
c
L
1.,
1
r
r •
AFFIDAVIT
n
I , 7—Dz,/9N6 /JgYLS M 1._ Sig//V being duly sworn, declare that I
am the owner of tKe property involved in this application and that the
foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of .
my knowledge and belief.
Subscribed and sworn before me
this ( day of -6, 19 77,
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing at 5.-'c,06% ---7-
g-VI--. .- e°. -- c:-() 9 2
Name of Notary Public) Signature of Owner)
263/ z'1 Lam'. sGA-,--rt--- WI ? 7 is so . ce,ivy 4,J /
Address) Address)
City) State)
Telephone)
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
This is to certif.yth=a -tithe foregoing application has been inspected by me
and has been fo° ndC'toRbe , orough and complete in every particular and to
conform to th,''ruir I
ze ulations of the Renton Planning Department
governing th °i1.V nl Ior(bsuch application .
Date Receive( JUL 1 iO
19 By:
Altle Renton Planning Dept .
2-73
t,luir;;;
i
C,
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL 1
That portion of Burlington Northern Inc. 's former 120 foot wide
right-of-way in Government Lot 2 and the fractional SW 4 of
section 19 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East, WM, City of Renton
described as follows :
Beginning at the intersection of the West line of Lind Avenue,
being 40 feet West, measure at right angles , from the centerline
thereof, and the northerly line of said right-of-way, which inter-
section is approximately 220 feet Northerly, measured at right angles,
from the centerline of Grady Way; thence Southwesterly along said
Northerly line 400 feet; thence South, parallel with said West line
of Lind Avenue to the Southerly line of said right-of-way; , thence
Northeasterly along said Southerly line of said right-of-way to
said West line of Lind Avenue; thence Northerly along said West line
of Lind Avenue to the point of beginning.
PARCEL 2
That portion of the Puget Sound Power and Light Company right-of-way
formerly the Puget Sound Electric Railway right-of-way, Renton
branch) in the Northwest 4 of section 19, Township 23 North, Range
5 East, W.M. , described as follows :
Beginning at the intersection of the North margin of S .W. Grady Way
with the West margin of Lind Avenue S.W. ; thence Southwesterly along
the north margin of S.W. Grady Way a distance of 395 feet; thence
Northwesterly at right angles to S .W. Grady Way to the south line of
the abandoned Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way a distance
of 50 feet more or less; thence northeasterly along the south line
of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way to the west margin
of Lind Avenue S.W. ; thence Southerly along said West margin to the
point of beginning.
I riL,
ti
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM F
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY '
I0
Application No. SiTiA/OROM4- S4-04.477
Environmental Checklist No. ,4-CF— 24a'- 77 11, _DFP10-6
PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date:
Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance
Declaration of Non-Significance ED Declaration of Non-Significance
COMMENTS :
Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires
all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their
own 'actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be
prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.
The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a
proposal is such a major action.
Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required , or where
you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should
include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele-
vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all
agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with-
out unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though completion may hot occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their .environmental review now, with-
out duplicating paperwork in the future.
NOTE : This is .a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to
your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the
next question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I . BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent !.,1flil/g- /JO
2. Address and phone number of Proponent:
3. Date Checklist submitted
D//,9'/7 7
4. Agency requiring Checklist
5. Name of proposal , if applicable :
6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate
understanding of its scope and nature) :
i' , .0 0 ae 6®u g- /=L..fi o ./Z )
2-
7. Location of proposal (describe the physical, setting of the proposal , as well
as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including
any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ
mental setting of the proposal ) :.
L o 0,9 re:4) i 7 S.a-J G o..err'. A/e
8. Estimated date 'for completion of the proposal :
Zer -
9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required fox the proposal
federal , •state and local --including rezones) :
10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain :
90 /Ti'a4J/9 i' ,ea 'TS a te sr /4-i,9ie __.
7-2,'zief%A./// ram' %".0 U.p. .e"
v//1///C/G_ E T i >.
11 . Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by'
your proposal ? ' If yes , explain :
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal ; if none has been completed , but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application' form:
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1) Earth. Will the proposal result in :
a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over-
covering of the "soil?
3Oh/2he/c. ;i j- ,,L L. .6 YES MAYBE NO
a
c) Change in topography or ground surface relief
features? L/
ES MAYBE NO
d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
YES MAYBE NO
e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils ,
either on or off the site?
YES MAYBE NO
f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or
changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
vbedoftheoceanoranybay, inlet or lake?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: 6'//-Z ',t/6
f S- v%/-S
a
7
3-
2) Air. Will the proposal result in:
a) Air emissions or deterioration, of ambient air
quality? v'
YES M YBE NO
b) The creation of objectionable odors? 1/
YES MAYBE NO
c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,
or any change in climate, either locally or
regionally? 1/
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
3) Water. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of
water movements , in either marine or fresh waters?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns, or
the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
YES MAYBE NO
d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
YES MAYBE NO
e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration
surface water quality, including but not limited to
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
YES MAYBE NO
f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters? G/
YES MAYBE NO
g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either
through direct additions or withdrawals , or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? d/
YES MAYBE NO
h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through
direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate,
phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria ,
or other substances into the ground waters?
YES MAYBE NO
i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available
for public water supplies?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:
a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any
species of flora (including trees, shrubs , grass, crops ,
microflora and aquatic plants)?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora?
YES' MAYBE NO
c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or
in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing
species?
YES MAYBE NO
d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
e.
4-
5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds , land animals including
reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms ,
insects or microfauna)?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area,
or result in a, barrier to the migration or movement
of fauna?
YES MAYBE NO
d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
6) Noise. Will the proposal, increase existing noise levels?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or
glare?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: - _ - --- -- -- -- ...-
8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the
present or planned land use of an area? r
YES MAYBE - NO
Explanation: --.___ ._.... - ----- --- -
9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in :
a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural, resource?
YES MAYBE. NO
Explanation:
10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal . involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset conditions?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation.: •
11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, or growth rate of the human population
of an area?
YES MAYBE NO-
Explanation:
5-
12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing? l/
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand
for new parking?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? rf
YES MAYBE TIT-
d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?
YES MAYBE NO
e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
YES MAYBE NO
f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles ,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
YES MBE NO
Explanation: qk2o.f„=iL T /&)/1- -A7 22 a r7%4//jz --
2/Ff c
0r/ -o/0, 11 .
6',9, 'ki//! /2 Fiat)/, e
G/s/ S iT
14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon ; or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas :
a) Fire protection?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Police protection?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Schools?
YES MAYBE NO
d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
YES MAYBE NO
e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
YES MAYBE NO
f) Other governmental services?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
15) Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
vthedevelopmentofnewsourcesofenergy?
YES WRY N0
Explanation:
16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities :
a) Power or natural gas? 1/
YES MAYBE NO
b) Communications systems?
YES MAYBE, NO
c) Water?
YES MAYBE NO
1w
6-
d) Sewer or septic tanks?
YES MAYBE NO
e) Storm water drainage? v
YES MATEE NU—
f) Solid waste and disposal?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
17) ' Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding
a.mental health)?
y€— MAYBE N
Explanation:
18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the r
quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeological or historical
site, structure, object or building?
YES MAYBE WO--
Explanation:
III. SIGNATURE
I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information
is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla-
ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should
there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Proponent:
C //
G `'
signed)
name printed)
City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76
pF R,
0 THE CITY OF RENTON
o' _ ?
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. PENTON, WASH. 98055
z o
O CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENTa
AO 235- 2550
EO SE PI
August 17 , 1977
Duane A. Wells
15 South Grady Way
Renton , Washington 98055
RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE
AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR REZONE
APPLICATION FROM 'G' TO 'M-P' ZONE, FILE NO.
R-072-77; AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT
OFFICE BUILDING IN AN M-P ZONE, FILE NO. SA-061-77;
PROPERTY LOCATED AT LIND AVENUE S.W. AND 10TH ST. S.W.
Dear Mr. Wells :
The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above
mentioned application on August 17 , 197.7 A public
hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been
set for September 6, 1977 at 1 : 30 P . M . .
Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present .
All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing .
If you have any further questions , please call the Renton
Planning Department , 235-2550 .
Very truly yours ,
Gordon Y . Ericksen
Planning Director
By l
Michael L. Smith
Associate Planner
MLS :ms
cc : Val Bain
Nielson & Smith, Architects & Planners
Of R.,
o ,
o THE CITY OF RE-NT-ON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH. 98055
o f CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT—
po 235-2550
P9TED SEP1T-
O
August 11 , 1977
Duane Wells
15 South Grady Way
Renton , Washington 98055
RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE
AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR
SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT
OFFICE BUILDING IN AN M-P ZONE;
FILE NO. SA-061-77 ; PROPERTY LOCATED
AT LIND AVE . S .W . AND 10TH ST. S .W.
Dear Mr. Wells :
The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above
mentioned application on August 8 , 1977 A public
hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been.
set for August 30 , 1977 ,at 9 : 00a .m.
Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present .
All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing .
If you have any further questions , please call the Renton
Planning Department , 235-2550 .
Very truly yours ,
Gordon Y . Ericksen
Planning Director
4s
e
i
By .
sociate . . nn.
MLS :wr
cc : Val Bain
Nielson & Smith , Architects & Planners
INTERDEPARTMENTAL REVIEW REQUEST
TO : PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
a BUILDING DIVIS.IO
ENGINEERING DIVISI —_____
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION j ,
UTILITIES DIVISION'
FIRE DEPARTMENT I
HEALTH DEPARTMENT
FROM : PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4 i( 1l .e.-I --CIA4 v 4
Contact Person
RE : Pil'A& AJLsuA
5 1 F L.I A- J4c_ I S 4- 0(0/ = 77
9
Please review the attached information regarding the subject
proposal nd return it to the Planning Department 'by
S1 77 with your written
recomme dation . Your response will be included as part of the
staff report to the Hearing Examiner.
Thank you ,
PLANNING D474EPARTMENT
i
44,..4,„/
Date '7/2-0 7
4.'
v
1
ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS
i '
TO : Finance Department
Fire Department "
1
Library Department
Park Department
Police Department
Public Works Department
Building Diva Traffic Engineering Div .
Engineering Diva. Ut lities . Engineering Div.x
FROM : Planning Department, (signed by respon ible official or his
designee)9 )
Ali aG a e,( ltM I I
SUBJECT : Review of ECF- oZ ,a •-77 ; APP l i cats od; No . : SA-ail—77
Action Name : p 1,tQtf W LL-51 (1 Tt A.rrio J;ct d,
Please review the attached . Review requested by ,(date) : 9/C/7-7
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :6._'
idljComments :
1 2y_SignaI
1 .,,''...
e•-•'''v'e-.e":0" 6°. //: C2---7/1; tp"•-•, ' 7- 2?
tur Director or Authorized Representative Date
1
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : -/-c yIhee- *--.
Comments : IV a g n;-p,'ca .f T-.,., e..,_f'
Signature' of Directo o Authorized Representative Date
i
6-76
OVER)
U
1 ,"01
s:R€VI'EW BY OTHER CIT` EPARTMENTS :
Department : UT/ LirICS
Comments : ME Tr v t-/ oN• - ) riv.iycl
fr Ir-r Irl-j aMAI FCtL e tv'svil LTjO/4
i
Z" wAT12IA- H-VAiL-r 1341- . I'/LOf?j' KAAU1it(a p!yfa.
IL) 0,1.g_2_ 77
Si'gna ure of Di rector or Authorized Represenit ti ve ,•Date
1 .
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : F fTc lei GlAI q L GIz11\/
Comments :
1 / I
i
r Aut/ on zed Re resent' ti veSignatureofDirectorop
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : FSR:..
A I.: CAPAb1c o-
Comments : A AQPaov ZER s Q
SuPP\ypiaC. F1ow;,coR cr%C2 •.c:NlcArs'Goa,
01J $cKe g%cz`emMIOCA . s ,dr 1.IA US CAQAbkE oT
So*p'y 6 ctEc 3 cte v c 1czTEE u.); ..
w --- 8A
Si gnature of Di re or Au 46' za epresentati ve Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :
Comments :
II
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
I•
1 I
tPLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
SEPTEMBER 6 , 1977
APPLICANT: DUANE A. WELLS AND VAL BAIN
FILE NO. ,REZONE NO . R-072-77 ; AND SITE . PLAN
APPROVAL , FILE NO . SA=061-77
A. SUMMARY OR REQUEST:
Applicant requests approval of rezone from G to M-P and SitePlan
approval of a proposed office/laboratory facility to be located
on a site consisting of the proposed rezone area together with the
existing M-P (Manufacturing Park) zoning . One hundred twenty
parking stalls are also proposed in conjunction with the facility
as per the City' s Parking and Loading Ordinance requirements
together with various landscaping areas around the perimeter and '
interior of the site .
B. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1 . Owner of Record : DUANE A . WELLS
2 . Applicant : DUANE A. WELLS AND VAL BAIN
3 . ' Location : Property located at the southwest corner of
Lind Avenue S . W. and S . W. 10th Street on
the old Burlington Northern Right-of-Way
and Puget Sound Power Line Right-of-Way
located between Grady Way and S . W. 10th
Street.
4. ' Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available
on file in the Renton Planning Department.
5. Size of Property :Approximately 1 . 56 acres .
6. Access : Via S . W. 10th Street .
7 . ' Existing Zoning : M-P , Manufacturing Park District and
G , General Classification District.
8 . Exisiting Zoning M-P , Manufacturing Park District and
in the Area : G , General Classification District.
9. Comprehensive
Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park
10. Notification : The applicant, was notified i.n writing of
the hearing date . Notice was properly
published in the Record-Chronicle and
posted in three places on or near the site '
as required by City Ordinances . Notice was
also given to surrounding property owners .
C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
To allow rezoning to Manufacturing Park District consistent with
surrounding zoning and comprehensive planning , zoning , and uses to
allow for development of a proposed office/laboratory facility
together with the necessary parking and landscaping .
D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND:
The subject site was annexed to the City on April 14 , 1959 , by
Ordinance No . 1745 . The subject site was part of a former railroad
right-of-way and also a portion of the site utilized for transmission
line right-of-way. Mr. Wells subsequently purchased the railroad
PLANNING. DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING OF SEPTEMBER 6, 1977
PAGE TWO
RE : DUANE A. WELLS AND VAL BAIN , REZONE , #R-072-77. AND SITE PLAN
APPROVAL , #SA-061-77
right-of-way and the power line right-of-way and rezoned a portion
of the subject site on December 17., 1976 by Ordinance No . 3083 to
Manufacturing Park District and re:ceived site ' plan: approval at that
time for a proposed office/warehouse complex . Mr . Wells has revised
his proposed use for the subject site which resulted in the proposed
rezone and site plan approval request.
E. PHYSICAL BACKGORUND:
1 . Topography : The site has an elevation of approximately equal
to that of S . W. 10th Street , however , both Lind Avenue S . W. and
Grady Way S. W. are at a higher elevation than the subject site ,
a certain amount of cutting and grading in conjunction with the
proposal will be required .
2 . Soils : Urban Land (Ur) .
3 . Vegetation : A large portion of the subject site has been
previously cleared as part of the previous proposed development
project for the site. Typical vegetation in the old railroad
right-of-way area extending west of the subject site is primarily
scrub grasses with mixed deciduous trees and bushes . It is
difficult to tell at this time whether or not the deciduous trees
are located on the subject site , if so they should be retained
as much as possible in the site development plan .
4 . Wildlife : The existing vegetation that remains on the site
provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals .
5. Water : Surface water and streams are not apparent on the subject
site , however , the elevation of the subject` site is such that
proper drainage will have to be provided as part of the site
development.
6. Land Use : Subject site is presently undeveloped . There is an
existing power line corridor located on the southerly portion
of the subject site for approximately the southerly fifty feet
thereof, however , the property is owned by the applicant and part
of the subject development the power company retains easement for
th& power line corridor. Just south of the power lines there
exists an area of public right-of-way to the improved portion of
Grady Way. The area within the old railroad right-of-way extending
west of the subject site is presently undeveloped . The area south
of the subject site is within the original Earlington Manufacturing
Park District and is presently developed to manufacturing park
standards . East of the subject site across Lind Avenue S . W. the
old railroad right-of-way is also presently undeveloped .
F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS:
The general area is in a transitional nature from undeveloped and
single family residence property to commercial and industrial uses .
G. PUBL'IC SERVICES:
1 . Water and Sewer : A 12 inch water main exists along S . W. 10th
Street and an 8 inch sewer main exists along Lind Avenue S . W.
A large Metro sewer interceptor line is located along S . W. 10th
Street. An 18 inch storm sewer exists along S .W. Grady Way .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING OF SEPTEMBER 6 , 1977
PAGE THREE
RE : DUANE A. WELLS AND VAL BAIN , REZONE , #R-072-77 AND SITE PLAN
APPROVAL , #SA-061-77 1
2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per
ordinance requirements . Any future development will be subject
to the City of Renton stadards .
3 . Transit : Transit Route No : 161 operates along Grady Warr S . W.
just south of the subject site.
4 . Schools : Not applicable . No existing schools are located in
the general area , the site is within the Renton School District.
5. Parks : No existing parks are located near the subject site .
H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE:
1 . 4-729; G, 'General Classification District.
2. 4-730; M-P , Manufacturing Park District.
3 . Chapter 22 ; Parking and Loading Ordinance .
I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
OR, OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS:
1 . Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan , June , 1976 , Objectives ,
pages 5 through 7 .
2. Resolution No . 1923, relating to City adoption of SCS require
ments for landscaping and wildlife habitat.
J. IMPACTS ON NATURAL SYSTEMS:
Rezone and development of site will change the character of the, site
and cause a certain amount of increase in storm water runoff , traffic ,
and noise . However , these imapcts will be relatively minor,
K, SOCIAL IMPACTS:
Development of the subject site may have future spin-off social
effects through an increase in employment and intensity of site usuage.
L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION:
Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the
State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43. 21C , a
Declaration of Non-significance has been issued for the subject
proposal ( see attached ) .
M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
A vicinity map and site map are attached .
N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED:
1 . City of Renton Building Division
2 . City of Renton Engineering Division
3 . City of Renton Utilities Division
4. City of Renton Fire Department
Copies of certain department memos are attached .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING OF SEPTEMBER 6, 1977
PAGE FOUR
RE : DUANE A. WELLS AND VAL BAIN , REZONE , #R-072-77' AND SITE PLAN
APPROVAL , #SA-061-77
0. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS:
1 . The subject rezone request .i's: consi`sten.t 'with the Comprehensive
Land Use Plan , existing zoning , and existing uses , within the
general area . The proposed use is a permitted use within the
M-P , (Manufacturing Park) zone .
2 . Proper utilities are available. to the site. Any development of
the site must conform to City of Renton utilities and off-site
improvement requirements .
3. The subject site , parcels 1 and 2 surround:, an existing M-P ,
Manufacturing Park zone (rezoned December 17 , 1976 , Ordinance
No .. 3083) and are intended to be incorporated into the overall
development plan for the area . The proposed use is an office/
laboratory facility together with related parking ( 120 spaces
required ; 120 spaces provided ) and landscaping . The use is
permitted within the M-P District .
4. Parcel 2 (the southerly parcel ) was purchased from Puget Power
and contains an easement for existing overhead electrical trans-
mission lines . .. According to' the agreement with Puget Power this
area cannot be utilized for permanent structures . Parking and
landscaping are proposed for this area . Parcel 1 is also pro-
posed for parking and landscaping as part of the total development .
5. A variance from the 60 foot setback requirement was granted by
the Board of Adjustment on August 18 , 1977 , subject to certain
conditions including landscaping the City right-of-way between
the subject ' s southerly property line and the edge of the existing
street improvements . A similar variance request for a 58 foot
setback along the .northerly portion of the site was denied by the
Board of Adjustment. A copy of that decision is attached .
6. The applicant has indicated that he will provide additional land-
scaping adjacent to the northerly facade of the proposed
structure. The Planning Department encourages this proposal to
assist in reducing the visual expanse of the proposed building .
7 . , A detailed landscape plan must be provided at the time of building
permit application submittal . Such plan should consist of a
suitable combination of trees , shrubs , and groundcover to provide
screening , buffering , aesthetic quality , and wildlife habitat as
per the Green River Valley. Comprehensive Plan , Objectives , pages
5 through 7 , and Resolution No . 1923 It appears that with the
planting areas shown on the plans and the Board of Adjustment ' s
conditions that the 2% site landscaping requirement of Resolution
No . 1923 will be met.
8 . The proposed building meets the height and site coverage limits
of the M-P zone.
9. The applicant has stated that he owns the additional property
west of the subject site to Powell Avenue S . W. along the abandoned
Burlington Northern Railroad Right-of-Way. Future similar
development by the applicant is anticipated . Rezoning of this
area will be necessary as well as subdivision if the property is
separately sold .
10. Dumpster locations have created some visual and locational
problems; within the Earlington Manufacturing Park. Proper site
screening and location should be required pursuant to the Green
River Comprehensive Plan , Objectives , and Section 4-3010(6) 1 .
s r
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING OF SEPTEMBER 6 , 1977
PAGE FIVE
RE : DUANE A. WELLS AND VAL BAIN ; REZONE , #R-072-77 AND SITE PLAN
APPROVAL , #SA-061-77
11 . Suitable storm water retention and oil /water separation facilities
should be provided as per Public Works ; Department approval .
12 . The elevation and topography of the subject site will require a'.
certain amount of cutting and grading as part of the on-site
construction . Proper slopes should be maintained (no greater
than 2 : 1 ) and properly landscaped . Certain areas may need a
rock retention wall .
P, PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS:
Recommend approval of the rezone request based on the above analysis
and its compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan , existing zoning .
together with the fact that proper utilities are available to serve
the subject site and the proposed development.
Approval of the site plan subject to the following :
1 . The conditions established by the Board of Adjustment ' s
decision of August 18 , 1977 .
2 . '"Maintenance of . a 60 foot ' setback along the northerly property
line as per the M-P standards .
3 . A detailed landscape plan including the areas designated for
landscaping on the site plan and the area adjacent to' the
building , together with the right-of-way area along Grady Way
must be submitted to and approved by the Renton Planning
Department at the time of building permit application submittal .
Such plans shall be consistent with the objectives of the Compre-
hensive Plan , the Parking and Loading Ordinance , and Resolution
No. 1923 .
a
4. Location and screening methods for refuse dumpsters must be
submitted to and approved by the Renton Planning Department.
5. Provisions of suitable storm water retention and oil /water
separation facilities subject to Public Works Department approval .
6 . Pr'ovisions of suitable utilities and off-site improvements per
Public Works Department, Uniform Building Code , Uniform Fire
Code and Section 4-102 requi-rements . This includes a sewer
extension along Lind Avenue S . W. , a new 12 inch water main from
S . W. 10th Street across the site to Grady Way , a temporary
service agreement along Grady Way, payment of all late-comers
and hookup charges , and provision of off-site improvements along
all bordering rights-of-way.
7 . Provision of suitable bank stabilization methods including
landscaping , rock walls , or maximum 2 : 1 slopes wherever necessary
subject to Public Works Department and Planning Department
approval .
I fd i [(;i)i P;,R,flLN i Ai_ i•.L.VI EW E LQUEST
TO : PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR A/, 0laj'e.i d+-.s. /4.-s+
P v.o v. de. i ma..s rc a,d eaQ.oe
BUILDING DIVISION.- . . da o ere f, %rt..r v..ev.c,;/Ip
ENGINEERING DIVIS-I-9
C e,'TRAFFIC ENGINEERIN IVISION
UTILI_TI_ES . N
11V- IRE DEPARTMENT
HEALTH DEPARTMENT
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT i1an ll 1-44.,
Contact Person
R E : P14. 1 ili.LS ' I Z. e- rAok r -To 44-p
Please review the attached information regarding the subject
proposal and return it to the Planning Department by
62/2.3/7- with your written
recommendation . Your response will be included as part of the
staff report to the Hearing Examiner.
1
Thank you ,
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
rH
Date J7 77
eLryJ
e,,.
Y,. r
Y
di; xbt,.
ROUTING FOR_ REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS
TO : Finance Department
Fire Department `'
Library Department
Park Department
Police .Department
Public Works Department
Building' Diva Traffic Engineering Div .
Engineering Div .,4 Utilities Engineering Diva(
FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his
designee)
NlcAae-( 5w4i Ten.
SUBJECT : Review of ECF- !a(pO -77 Application No . : Sit-OA - 77
Action Name : pui i In)iL`S
1 (
1'°re 4 J4
Pleaise review the attached . Review requested by (date)
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : '
Department:
Comments :
tea
7-2/ 7?
Si gnat.ur Di rector or Authorized Representati ve Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department: E•K q ;he,e,./; w-s\
fComments : !`l o g „.; 'ca
Authorized Representative ate
Signatur of Dlrecto o Representative
6-76
OVER) ..
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : UT/ LiTIE'S
Comments :
METn.° Lima ON Ly ) +•UILL. 12r442 1.1ifl./16
GIT/ M-j +6 MAIM Foil. 00/vAi tffT/O/V!
1Z" w. t o,'. ft VAIL,MULE- -. P4,011 ltlletula C h/la.411" /`./ I Ii
g-2= )7
Signa ure of Director or Authorized Representative ` Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :T k i FFT6 E N GLNI E. IE le IAl G
Comments :
Na c Jr-)c 011 /
1_ 2 L`V)c2_,
Signature.
10 6..1 --
of Director or Au ' orized Representative e
44
I
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : `ryRx:..
Comments : A Z A,ScRovE20 w$MiiL Ck Sv-RIP% l CRP0. 6lE eg
SuQPVia c. R Q eivaet Ova c c C"ect*z 9RoTe.cN oU,
SURc›V/l 1Q -NNW_ RE cvme® 1 KzE c U).
b9“4.\‘‘ \ e,/4 /rjr
Signature of Dire .' 11, or Au ? z.eL9epresentati ve Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :
Comments :
r, Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
w
PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Rezone No . R-072-77
Site Approval
Application No . No . SA-061-77 PROPOSED Declaration
Environmental Checklist No . •ECF-260-77 El FINAL Declaration
Description of proposal Rezone from G to M-P and Site Plan
Approval for office/laboratory use in M-P zone.
Proponent DUANE A. WELLS
Location of Proposal Southwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 10th Street
Lead Agency Renton Planning Department
This proposal has been determined to ® have; 0 not have a
significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is
x] is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) ( c ) . This decision was
made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental
checklist and other information on file with the lead agency .
Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : •
1. Project is of minor scope and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan,
existing zoning, and existing uses in the, area.
2. This negative declaration is further based upon the provision of site
landscaping suitable to meet Soil Conservation Service requirements for
wildlife habitat mitigation as outlined in Resolution No. 1923 and the
Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan.
Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the
environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would
withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final )
declaration of non- significance :
Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen
Title Plann ' ' g Dir-cto 00/' i Date August 30, 1977
Signature Ali„,
City of RentonOrPlanningDepartment
5-76
RENTON BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
PUBLIC HEARING MEETING
MEETING #133-77JAUGUST 18, .1977
q P4"
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT
Francis Holman, Barbara Lally-, John Qualls' and' Kenneth Swanigan.
CITY STAFF PRESENT
James C. Hanson, Plan Examiner, Developmental Services Division, and Mary Pringle,
Recording Secretary.
1 . CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Board of Adjustment was called to order by Chairman
Qualls at 8:02 P.M.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Chairman led those present in the 'flag salute. . '
3. ROLL CALL
The secretary called the roll. All members. responded present with the exception
of BAUER (out of town) , CAMPANELLA (conflicting meeting) and SMITH (out of town) .
ACTION: Motion made by HOLMAN, seconded by SWANIGAN, that the absent membelvs be
excused. MOTION.CARRIED.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
ACTION: Motion made by SWANIGAN, seconded by HOLMAN, ,that the minutes as the
Auguo.t 3, 1977 me.e.ting be appnoved as ointed. MOTION CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE
The Chairman advised that- he had received a note from Mrs. Lally thanking the
Board for their expression of sympathy at the time of her recent bereavement
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS SCHEDULED
a) V-321-77 DUANE A. WELLS and VAL BAIN request variance to con-
struct building within required 60' yard along street, 58'
from S.W. 10th Street, 52' from S.W. Grady Way, property
located in the vicinity of S.W. 10th Street and Lind Avenue S.W.
The chairman opened the public. hearing. Mr. Hanson read applicant's answers to
the questions on the variance application and advised the Board that the prop-
erty involved is in an MP Zone, which requires a 60' setback. He advised that
applicant had submitted an additional list of eight reasons why they felt
special circumstances applied. At the Board's request he read that list and
then presented two plans, the first one submitted with the variance request,
on which he pointed out the location of Grady Way, Lind and S.W. 10th Street,
and the..second, a City of Renton plan showing Lind Avenue improvements, noting
there is a large distance which varies from 20 to 35 or 40 feet from appli-
cant's property to the existing paved area. He pointed out that this street is
included in the Six .Year Street Program and that after improvements there would
still be 22.5 feet from the sidewalk to applicant's property line. He then
RENTON BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
PUBLIC HEARING MEETING .
AUGUST 18, 1977
PAGE TWO
described the proposed usage of applicant's building and the size, and then
showed slides of applicant' s property and the general area.
Mr. Duane Wells, 1`., South Grady Way, Renton, was present to speak in behalf •
of the' application.- He advised they• were asking, for, an eight foot encroach-
ment into •the front yard setback andtw6 feet in the rear and. would. provide
twenty feet' of landscaping instead of the ten feet required to compensate.
The Board questioned the applicant regarding reason for change in plans from
a warehouse, for which variance had previously been granted, to an office/
laboratory building, .t.he need for the size building proposed, and then ques-
tioned Mr. Hanson regarding other properties and buildings in the area and
street plans for the area, particularly regarding the streets on the three
sides of applicant's property.
There were no others present to speak for or against the application and the
public portion.of the hearing was closed.
ACTION: Mo-ti.On made by SWANIGAN that the van,iance be denied as no bpecfa.e.
c:ih.c.ume.tanceo ex,is.t in th-is case, 6u.'tthek that gkanti ng .such a
variance..wvukd extend a pni.v.i.ee.ge. .-to .tIu.5 app.e i cant which has not
been pkov.i.ded to o.thens, and. a buZedi.ng can be built to eompty
with .the. oncei.nanee.
No second was received to the motion.•
ACTION: Motion made by LALLY, .seconded by HOLMAN, that -the iiitzt pant o
the vantccnce. Aeque.st pe't.tac.ning .to pnopenty ae.ong S.W. 10-th S.tkeet
be denied.
Roll call vote followed. MOTION CARRIED unanimously.
ACTION: Motion made. by LALLY, seconded by HOLMAN; .that: the vafc,i.anee n.e.ques-t
peM-tcu.n,i.ng to pnowt.)e:T..ty along S.W. Grady Way be gnan.ted due -to
oecia.2 c i tc.ume.tanee,s in that -the. pn.apeic ty is 6uWvwunded by .titn.ee
koaduxty4, .the gna i.ti.ng o f pon..ti.on of .the neques.t being eon-
ti.ngent on £a.ndscapi.ng being i.ns.ta.e..ee.d and ma.i.ntoined by appei.can-
between appt i.ca tit.'.5 pkopen ty £ i.ne and the S.W. Gn.a.dy Way stnee.t
i.mphovemen-J6.
Roll call vote followed, with the following result: Swani.gan - No;
Haman, La.tky and Qua-ea - Aye. MOTION CARRIED.
b) V-322-77 RICHARD L.. IMUS requests variance to construct esidence
within required 20' setback along public right-of-wa 7' from
ight-of-way; property located in the vicinity of 643 Ripley
La-- North
The Chairman opened t' : public hearing. Mr. Hanson -ead applicant's answers to
questions on the variance - -plication and then r-=• a petition supporting the
variance request signed by to neighboring • •perty owners. He pointed out
plan showing location of propose. eside -e on the lot and a survey of the area,
advising that zoning ordinance does r:,uire a twenty foot setback from public
right-of-way but there are no pla - to de = op the street in that area, and then
showed slides of applicant's pr-•erty and the • - eral area.
Mr. Richard Imus, 5427 - 7th Avenue S.E. , Bellevue, - present to speak in be-
half of his applicati• . He stated their property is uniqu- .s they have 200
feet along City pr••erty and 60 feet along the lake and as he di- not wish to
enter property •'f marshy City property he would have .to enter on t` = end of his
own property - d to conform to the setback would preclude the size and le
house the anted and felt desirable because of the value of the property.
The Board questioned Mr. Hanson regarding streets in area and how other residents
e ered their property.
RENTON "BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
PUBLIC HEARING MEETING
AUGUST 18, 1977
PAGE THREE
T were no others present to speak for or against the application and the
public ion of the hearing was closed.
ACTION: Motion ma LALLY, seconded by S that vah.iance be gh.an-te.d
to a J.ow com .0 6eve app! .cant.can
enjoy 6ame. pt .vit n • caw .tot ae othem enjoy.
call vote followed. MOTION CARR animously.
6. OLD BUSINESS
None.
7. NEW BUSINESS
None.
8. ANNOUNCEMENTS
None.
9. ADJOURNMENT
ACTION: Motion made. by HOLMAN, seconded by SWANIGAN, that the meeting be
adjo wcned. MOTION CARRIED. The meeting adjourned at 8:54 P.M.
Q p a X// t
dames C. Hanson, Acting Secretary
Renton Board of Adjustment
APPROVED
CITY OF RENTON,. WASHINGTON
A
RESOLUTION NO. 1923
WHEREAS the United States Department of Agriculture , Soil
Conservation Service , has submitted to •the City of Renton,as well as
other cities ,/ iag County, a letter agreement dated June 3 , 1974 ,
for the purpose of evaluating environmental setting within the Green
River area, and
WHEREAS the City of Renton elects to become a party to any such
agreement , NOW THEREFORE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS :
SECTION I : The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and
directed to execute that certain Letter Agreement dated June 3 , 1974 ,
a true copy being attached hereto and incorporated herein, on behalf
of the City of Renton.
SECTION II : No City funds shall be expended for the acquisition
of any property within the subject area, or commitments made therefor,
without prior approval of the City of Renton, and subject to applicable
budget laws.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 22nd day of July, 1974 .
Delores . Mead, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 22nd day of July, 1974 .
6.1L-- L,t,?
AceWilMit tt', Mayor
Ap ved as toawn.
A cf.„,
Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney
k.
i . ''C-: ( (2') 0` ..I\L'.`\ < l.r, \
a,.:`...--___—_
UNITE'' `f`A' ?' `EF9AR TMENT-OFAtirttwL vrtt
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
Room 360 U. S. Courthouse, • Spokane, :Washington 99201
June 3, 1974
Mr. John D. Spellman
County Executive, King County
King County Courthouse
Seattle, Washington 98104
King County Engineers Office
Green River Flood Control Zone District
Room 400 King County Courthouse
Seattle, Washington 98104
Mr. Ralph Backstrom
Chairman, King Co. Conservation District
35 .South Grady Way
Renton, Washington 98055
Mayor Frank E. Todd
City of Tukwila
City 'Hall
14475 59th Avenue South
Tukwila, Washington 98067
Mayor Avery Garret
City of Renton
City Hall
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
Mayor Isabel Hogan
City of Kent
City Hall
P.O. Box 310
Kent, Washington 98031
Mayor Stanley P. Kersey
City Hall
City of Auburn
20A Street Northwest
Auburn, Washington 98002
Gentlemen and Ms. Hogan:
It is essential that environmental considerations be Fully recognized in
carrying out the East and West Side Green River Watershed Work Plans. An
evaluation of environmental setting and project measure impact reveals the
need for agreement between the sponsoring local organizations and Soil
Conservation Service on the following.
f'- 14";.1 • : tom.
y.;.i•• " Y'yy .'
r•, ,r' `}'• '• .
r •!+4'+ .a• . 'r • 1 •" •
1 '•1 Yi r• ' . t.'...ti:':1• .
rt i . ' • 's .. .. :', iY.i N•.
y:-. .
I
I
2-
The sponsoring.. local, organizations will ;
I . Purchase in title -or perpetual easement and maintain in public control
during, the life of the projects at least 110 acres of suitable wetland
habitat at locations approved by the SCS and the Washington State
Department of Game.
2. In granting commercial-industrial development permits'with the Green
River Flood Control Zone District require:
a. A. landscape development plan that will provide reasonable consider-
ation for wildlife and esthetic values (environmental quality)
for the area planned for buildings andg parking lots ;
b. a significant portion (not less than two percent) of the land
involved be designated and 'commerce-industry managed for the
life of the project to produce wildlife habitat for species
best suited to site, conditions, and location;
L
c. all land not needed or used for other 'purposes,. be planned and
managed' for wildlife open-space until such 'time as it is utilized
in additional developments. r
3. With Soil Conservation Service assistance, preserve or replace existing I
wildlife habitat along affected channels .
4. With Soil Conservation Service assistance, provide fish passage through
structural measures where deemed necessary by the Service and the
Washington State Department of Fisheries.-
L
5. Adopt and enforce a land use plan (policy) consistent with the regional f"
land use policy of the Puget Sound Governmental Conference or the 4RegionalPlanningAuthorityhavingjurisdictionbeforePublicLaw566
funds are expended on any part of an independent system.
I am in agreement with the above. If you are in agreement, please sign in
the space provided and return to the Coordinating Sponsor (King County) for r
further processing.
Galen S. Bridge Date /;'<<<74-/
State Conservationist f
r
L.
Green River Flood Control Zone District By 4
Local Organization
Room 900 K.C. Adm. Bldg. Seattle Wa.i %' ec; or ul lic Works 101
Address Zip Code Date
x
1
0•4441
41 ate
3
h
so, 4
IN k v
All 100141?
Of wi
i
Pen'10 PIP
o
il rill
s ate `
0 111ij11d111I .11 fr; 1 10 Nll1rd,
41 II II 0 do I ill :1 Jrriob... •
00-
0
rill ri to lir 4r
JO i 1 0 IP
ir0115w000rill111aill _..,,rii iii F . . 110111
rgrpfl
c se l it too'
Nogg Mlk4 4 YAK•PAW
No. 1t•on-71
y
c
ma
r
4
4
E
ov-
t
6+
dAMS
v
w
na
c
i
3h
i
r
3t)
PEC .
SVIN/
Ma
A
F./+..+
1
fill0
SOO/
E
M
411111.
1P•
t
t
off
I
Illil
Nob
isef!- •
4
100
0POP. .
II
iiilii
111:
sai
1
0 -
IP
i
pJlII ,
O
4
IF
1
r...•-•-• , .
rid
le •
gm%
1iia
co ,
aii
ir
1001
0
Oil.
ScAse ,' ,
coo'
Asa
Oa
y ,
NO. !
A
of.
S
1t
tn+
i
1
iihp.,Jf •'
K^r • ....a,,
17§. ,,
4..
vim• !7
4:
a?, ---
i„ f'
qi4 '
47,
4 ', • ' S-4
1‘''
t•
1-..
i )
ill
m >
s- v) E F
44), . . ,
4
S W 7TH
i
B-1 • .. t . / • • - .
ti a -
Ir ., 1(
W-SV f r.
i
r,c. s• !!
i.1% .
NI,O!l:IN11• 111111II'H1Iu 1 i,I
1
1 1 1rp I N t'' 0,M.
I I f Ili I I
R"`ors n¢ III -III r,n i.
y., . ,;
K.
3ley . c,1 Y, •IIpN•II All
all I
1. l e; ' l -
4 •
I pll , :
I
i.{1I I In '
I• Nl: i;1i 0
1 I i0j1 :a'l/.
1., ,/
1
5! . , , %
n. I , II
a illinw ill li gii da •
I
cam,: !hie J5 • -
1 ' ) ::::`
r •\ ///1/I
A 1 ,.
f4:...• ., .
m IM ` C. t.mow.. • • - C^J..
Ls^ -
A.
N u
IIIrw I l. . ...r I iti 1 i • .:..1 -:
I .•
M \
TH r
6 -I` 1 , G Gr6Q0 . f .
L I, C
L': • .. ; .0-'600 - • -1 ' ' " • ,\;,
V S I /
O Y 11, •
r.41 '.' 1- ' '. • wr..'•!..
n ,..
Q .yi
Y.
t, 1 I Q
I,
e
i
iol. 5 W;ail G- . ,,,J _ u ..
1
11 i -
I . 777 •
I I 1
I
4
t i I I-
r v 1; O.
101.. el.J ,1M
i..+i
9Tu • ST
TTTT l lO,l
1
I i(I lili. 7-
REZONE APPLICATION : ' G ' TO M-P ; SITE PLAN APPROVAL
DUANE A. WELLS'AND VAL -BAIN : Appl . .No . R=072-77 , and .Appl . No . SA-061-77 ;
Property located at the. southwest corner-of Lind Avenue S . W. and S . W.
10th Street on the old Burlington Northern Right-of-Way and Puget Sound
Power Right-of-Way located between S . W. Grady Way and S . W. 10th Street
APPLICANT 'DUANE A. WELLS AND VAL BAIN TOTAL AREA ± 1 . 56 acres
PRINCIPAL- ACCESS S. W. 10th Street
EXISTING ZONING' M-P , Manufacturing Park and G, General Classificatior.
EXISTING USE • • Undeveloped
PROPOSED USE Office/laboratory facility
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park
COMMENTS
1.
1
4_
S 1, :
1,1 ,. ING
oF FILE
FILE TITLE
Tt.
ii”,JO"*, If!' II ( ' .., , i . i ' • ..
I
1