The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA77-092BEIphs1II461 OF FILE FILE TITLE 5 ilC171Llifir L I ems-' 0.54.e92.77 C,,,, h/s h/esToR'sl o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055o O CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT co- Q. 235 - 2550O, Q. i fD ISEP1C-1 MEMORANDUM March 6, 1978 TO: C. J. Delaurenti, Mayor FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director RE: _ VALLIS INVESTOR' S CLINIC DEVELOPMENT-- (FORMER POPE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3713 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH) Ronald Nelson, Building Division and Michael Smith, Planning Department inspected the subject site on March 6, 1978. Con- siderable progress has been accomplished on the site within the past several weeks in alleviating certain problems and coordinating development activities with both the Planning Department and Building Division. No further clearing activity has occurred, however, site clean up has been undertaken. The large piles of excavated dirt have been removed, together with most of the brush and tree debris per city specifications. A revised landscape plan has been submitted by the applicant and: is being reviewed by the Planning Department. The trees remaining around the site will be preserved and incorporated into the landscaping theme for the clinic. It is both the applicant' s and Planning Department' s intent to off-set any tree removal during construction with proportionate additions to the landscape plan. The Planning Department and Building Division are presently developing procedures to improve coordination of the permit and, inspection process per your request. GYE' I: ms cc: Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Ronald G. Nelson, Supervisor of Developmental Services Division t gyp' •/‘' IDz THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI • MAYOR O PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235 - 2550 04teo SEPSE O MEMORANDUM 4 `r, 9 pp January 31 , C f R,S FFc N TO: Files c4-7IZOZ•ii` FROM: Michael L . Smith, Associate Planner RE : VALLIS INVESTORS, SITE GRADING FOR PROPOSED CLINIC I met today at approximately 11 : 30 a . m. with the contractor and Al Dansereau (owner) at the site to review the status of the clearing and grading operation . The cleanup work outlined in my January 30, 1978, memo had not yet been accom- plished. I again expressed my concern about the operation and the present situation and said that it had to be cleaned up immediately or the entire operation would be shut down . Mr. Dansereau said that he was concerned about protecting his interests on the remainder of the property and told the contractor to start the required clean-up immediately. The contractor agreed. Mr. Dansereau said that he would contact the architect to prepare a revised detailed landscape plan , which would more than offset the tree removal on site . I also said that there would be no further trees removed east and west of the building as part of the parking and landscaping plan . MLS:wr o THE CITY OF RENTON ZMUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT o co' 235 - 2550 OeO SEPZv' MEMORANDUM January 30, 1978 TO : Files FROM : Michael Smith, Associate Planner RE : VALLIS INVESTORS; SITE GRADING FOR PROPOSED CLINIC I visited the site at approximately 1 : 30 p .m. today and found that the contractor had not proceeded according to the previous agreement established at the site on January 25 , 1978 , and January 27 , 1978 . Trees marked to be saved had been taken out without notice to the Planning Department. The ravine area below the approved lowest building elevation was covered with dirt. There were also huge piles of dirt in the areas clearly understood to be left natural both east and west of the building enveloped . Trees far beyond the outer building envelope designated at on- site meetings with both the contractor, owner , and architect were cleared and removed . I told the contractor that the ravine area below the lowest building elevation should be cleared up immediately, together with the large piles of dirt and debris on both the east and west sides of the building envelope. This was to be accomp- lished before any other site work was to be done. When I got back to the office I immediately called the architect and AL Dansereau , owner of the property, and expressed my concern about what had happened and the immediate steps necessary to improve the situation . MLS : lml' CD THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR e PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235 - 2550o,P lfD sE P1ti4. January 27 , 1978 MEMORANDUM TO: Files FROM: Michael Smith , Associate Planner RE : VALLIS INVESTORS, SITE GRADING FOR PROPOSED CLINIC Roy and I met today with Ron Thompson , architect for the developer, andJoe Starkovich , contractor, out at the site to review the grading and clearing of the site. We had also met on January 25 , 1978, on the site to review this subject. At that time, Al Dansereau and John Starkovich were present together with Ron Thompson . On both occasions , we reviewed in detail the care and caution with which the clearing and grading operation must be handled. We reviewed the proposed building envelope and emphasized that , if any trees were near the outside perimeter of the envelope , they should be saved until we can specifically review on-site whether or not to remove them. We also stated that there be no encroachment farther into the ravine than the absolute established line and farther east, west, or north than the building envelope established and marked on that day. Th-ey indicated that they would proceed with the utmost care and caution on the area within th.e established building envelope only as the first phase . We marked the trees on January 27, 1978, (with the contractor and architect present) that were close to the outside of the building perimeter that should be saved for further inspection . We emphasized several times that no trees or areas outside the building envelope indicated on the site are to be disturbed until the architect and the Planning Department further review the possibilities . The architect could then prepare the final landscape plan with all the trees to be saved indicated on the plans for approval by the Planning Department. MLS :wr pF R., A4 41 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 z o p = o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI I MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 0 Q- L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 41F0 S18)EP1°1. December 5, 1977 Mr. Ron Thompson RE: File No. SA-092-77 31101 18th Avenue South Vallis Investors Federal Way, Washington 98003 Dear Mr. Thompson: This is 'to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of November 17, 1977, has not been appealed within the time period set by ordinance, and therefore, this application is considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing. Since ely '--) L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner LRB:mp cc: V•Del Mead, City Clerk Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 18th day of November 19 77 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record 'in the below-entitled application or petition. 4/, f, • Subscribed and sworn this \4, - day of *o\•2w\o-( 19 't . Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton. Application, Petition or Case: Vallis Investors. SA-092-77 The minuted contain a £Ls.t 06 the panties 06 necotd) J November 17, 1977 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTDII I REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Vallis Investors FILE NO. SA-092-77 APPLICANT: LOCATION: Property located in the vicinity of 3713 Talbot Road South immediately south of South 37th Street. SUMMARY OF RE Uq EST: Applicant requests approval of site plans, landscaping, and elevations for a proposed 7,000 square foot two-levelmedicalofficebuildingonapproximately1.2 acres of a total 8.2 acre site. The proposed office is the initial phase of a proposed clinic, campus-type development on the total site. SUMMARY OF ACTION:Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: App royal with conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on November 8, 1977. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the spplication, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing, was opened on November 15, 1977 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were sworn. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the representative for the applicant had received and reviewed thee Planning Department ,report, and the report was entered , into the record as Exhibit #1. Michael, Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the 'following I1 additional exhibits into the record: 1 1 Exhibit' #2: King County Assessor's Map Exhibit #3: Site Map Exhibit #4: Restrictive Covenants Exhibit #5: Building Elevations on the final Mr. ' Smith reported that building eastowouldthe Examinertsdinquiry regardingnl75th conform to city requirements. In response to be in line with the access Street, Mr. Smith stated that the street appearsstrip.truty The Examiner asked if restrictive covenants had been .signed and filed i thhKing Count and if criteria for design review had been met by the applicant. that the covenants had, been property filed and design criteria we met alllrequirements. Item P.4. of Exhibit #1 and that plans for the proposed building He' also stated that although Alderwood soil in the ravine created erosionlhazard,low Indianola soil on the building site was suitable because of high permeabilityof anda low erosion hazard. In response to the Examiner's question regarding masterbut plan,, Mr. Smith reported that a plan had not been requested prior to final approval,the applicant was encouraged to proceed on the master plan prior to initiating additional phases of construction. The Examiner asked the representative for the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was: Ron Thompson . 31101 18th,Avenue South . Federal Way, Washington 98003 SA-092-77 Page Four An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said office. RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT HEARING EXAMINER PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER NOV 1 51977 AM PM PUBLIC HEARING 7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,3,4,5,6 NOVEMBER 15 , 1977 177HIB IT T4 APPLICANT : VALLIS INVESTORS 77 FILE NO. : SA-092-77 , SITE PLAN APPRQVAI I ZONE A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST : Applicant requests approval of site plans , landscaping , and eleva- tions for a proposed 7 ,000 square foot two-level medical office building on approximately 1 . 2 acres of a total 8. 2 acre site . The proposed office is .the initial phase of a proposed clinic , campus-type development on the total site . B . GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : VALLIS INVESTORS 2 . Applicant: VALLIS INVESTORS ter 3. Location : Property located in the vicinity of 3713 Talbot Road South immediately south of South 37th Street . 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5. Size of Property : Approximately 8 . 3 acres total - pro- posed initial phase approximately 1 . 2 acres . 6 . Access : Via Talbot Road South 7 . Existing Zoning : P-1 , Public Use District . 8 . Existing Zoning P- 1 , Public Use District ; SR- 1 , in the area : Single Family Residence ; G-9600 , General Classification District . 9 . Comprehensive Public and Quasi -public . Land Use Plan : 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record- Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . Notice was distri - buted to the surrounding property owners . C . PURPOSE OF REQUEST : To allow initial phase development of a proposed total campus- type medical clinic complex . D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed to the City on April 15 , 1959 , by Ordinance No . 1743 . The Comprehensive Plan 'in the area was studied and amended on October 22 , 1974 . The subject site was rezoned to P-1 on July 11 , 1975 , by Ordinance No . 2944 . Certain restrictive covenants dealing with retention of the natural character of the site and ravine area , together with certain developmental requirements , were filed on July 23 , 1975 , and run with the land . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF NOVEMBER 15 , 1977 PAGE TWO RE : VALLIS INVESTORS , SA-092-77 , SITE. PLAN APPROVAL IN P- 1 ZONE E . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography : The northeast portion of the site is relatively level . The southerly portion of th•e site contains an exist- ing ravine area with steep slopes averaging approximately 35 percent. The westerly half of the site generally slopes downward toward the west at an approximate ten percent grade. 2 . Soils : A majority of the site consists of Indianola Loamy Fine Sand ( InC ) . This soil has rapid permeability ; available water capacity is moderate ; runoff is slow to medium; and erosion hazard is slight to moderate . This soil is used for timber and for urban development. The ravine area consists of Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC) . Runoff is medium, and erosion hazard is severe . The slippage poten- tial is moderate . This Alderwood Soil is used mostly for timber. This soil does not appear to be appropriate for urban-type development. 3 . Vegetation : There are a number of significant evergreen and deciduous trees , both on the level areas of the site around the existing residence and within the ravine area . The restrictive covenants ( see attached ) designate the existing significant trees and the ravine area for preser- vation and incorporation into the development of the site . The ravine area is to be preserved in its natural woodland- type vegetation or enhanced with suitable native-type . vegetation . 4 . Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site may provide some habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water : There is an existing year-around stream located near the bottom of the ravine area near the southerly portion of the subject site . 6 . Land Use : There is an existing single family residence located on the subject site. There are existing clinics located south and southeast of the subject site . Valley General Hospital is located approximately 1/8 mile south of the subject site . There are existing single family residences located directly north of the subject site on the north side of South 37th Street and east of the subject site on the east side of Talbot . Road South . Except for the one existing single family residence , the subject site is undeveloped . F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area is characterized by a mixture of single family residences and public/quasi -public uses in the form of the Hospital and supportive medical clinics . G. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer: There is an existing 20 inch water main located along Talbot Road South and an existing Metro sewer gravity line located along South 37th Street and Talbot Road South . Storm sewers are not available in the area . There are drainage ditches , however , and any development on the site will be subject to suitable storm water reten- tion and oil /water separation facilities prior to out-flow from the site. 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . See attached memorandum. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF NOVEMBER 15 , 1977 PAGE THREE RE : VALLIS INVESTORS , SA-092-77 , SITE PLAN APPROVAL IN P-1 ZONE 3. Transit : Metro Route 145 operates along. S. W. 43rd Street approximately 1/4 mile south of the subject site . 4 . Schools : The subject site is not to close proximity to any existing schools , and the proposed project will not have an effect on existing school population except pos- sibly indirectly through increased employment opportunities in the area . 5 . Parks : The subject site is approximately one mile south of Talbot Hill Park . H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-710 , P-1 , Public District 2 . Chapter 22 , Parking and Loading I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1 . Policy Statement, Comprehensive Plan, Renton Urban Area , 1965 , Summary , pages 9 and 10. 2 . Land Use Report, 1965 , Objectives , pages 17 and 18. 3. Restrictive Covenants filed July 23 , 1975 , running with the land . J . IMPACTS ON THE NATURAL SYSTEMS : Development of the site will disturb soil and vegetation , increase storm water runoff, and has an effect on noise levels in the area . However, these can be mitigated by proper develop- ment controls and procedures and adherence to the existing restrictive covenants and sound planning principles and practices . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS : Changing the use from low density, single family residential to quasi -public , medical clinic , may result in additional social interaction at the site as well as in the surrounding area . L . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43 . 21C , a Declaration of Non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal (see attached ) . This declaration is based on development of the site consistent with the existing vegetation and natural character of the site and incorporation of these elements within site development. Retention of the natural characteristics of the site , as per the restrictive covenants , is essential in protecting the quality of the environment of the area and reducing potential impacts to surrounding properties . M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : A vicinity map and site map are attached. N . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division 3. City of Renton Utilities Division 4 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 5 . City of Renton Fire Department SA-092-77 Page Three not been prepared; however, the applicant agreed to providing the plan. This plan will be utilized by staff in finalizing the building and parking locations to retain as many of the existing trees as possible per the restrictive covenants. 3. Any refuse dumpsters on the site should be reviewed by the Planning Department. Their location should be compatible with the site plans, and they should be screened from view in a manner compatible with the architecture of the building. 4. The amount of intrusion of the building into the ravine is reasonable. Due to the requirements of the restrictive covenants and the physical condition of the ravine, any deviations from the building location as shown in Exhibit #3 and as staked on the property should be subject to approval of the Planning Department. 5. Prior to clearing and grading of the site the landscape plan should be approved by the Planning Department and the storm water retention and oil/water separation facilities approved by the Public Works Department. 6. The master plan for development of the entire site is a reasonable and useful tool in evaluating subsequent development. This plan should be provided at submittal of the next building proposal. 7. In general terms the building design (Exhibit #5) is compatible with the site and surrounding area. However, additional review of the building design is necessary to achieve more compatibility. This review can be accomplished by the Planning Department. 8. A review of the site plan (Exhibit #3) and the King County Assessor's Map Exhibit #2) indicates that some additional review by the Public Works Department is necessary to align the proposed access road wi.th South 175th Street. This alignment is important to facilitating traffic circulation to and from the site and along Talbot Road South. DECISION: Based upon the record, testimony, findings and conclusions, it is the Examiner's decision to approve the proposal subject to the conditions recommended in the Staff Report (Exhibit #1) , and furthermore, that the building will intrude no further into the ravine than what is marked by the existing stakes on the property. ORDERED THIS 18th day of November, 1977. L. Rick Beeler Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 18th day of November, 1977 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Ron Thompson Richard McFadden TRANSMITTED THIS 18th day of November, 1977 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Council President George J. Perry Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Division Larry Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before December 2, 1977. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. SA-092-77 Page Four An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that suchiappeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said office. III PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF NOVEMBER 15 , 1977 PAGE FOUR RE : VALLIS INVESTORS , SA-092-77 , SITE PLAN APPROVAL IN P- 1 ZONE Copies of certain memoranda and comments are attached . 0. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The site plan as proposed appears to be consistent with the restrictive covenants (see attached) for the site , except that existing trees have not been indicated. These must be indicated, and any trees needing removal must be approved by the Planning Department. Final plan approval may require minor shifts in parking and building arrangements to save the existing trees and site character. The parking areas should be planned and grouped around the existing trees as much as possible . 2 . The proposed plan is consistent with the minimum setbacks established by ordinance and the restrictive covenants . 3. The proposed plan is the initial phase of a campus-type clinic development proposed for the entire site . All subsequent phases are subject to covenant and ordinance standards and will require similar •site plan approval by the Planning Department staff and Land Use Hearing Examiner. 4. The proposal is generally consistent with the minimum land- scape buffering requirements of the covenants and ordinance . However, specific landscape plans indicating trees to be removed or retained , together with additional landscaping, have not been submitted. These plans must be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department prior to develop- ment on the site as per the restrictive covenants . 5 . It is the Planning Department ' s determination that the proposed plan does not significantly extend into the ravine area and is , therefore , consistent with covenant requirements . 6 . The proposed building does not exceed the 'height limit established by covenant . However, it must be stressed that building design be of a character that is compatible with the Northwest woodland nature of the site. Final building design should be subject to Planning Department review and approval . 7 . Suitable access is provided via Talbot Road only , thereby assuring consistency with covenant requirements . 8. Suitable utilities are available to the subject site . ' However, specific design and changes should be approved by the Public Works Department. 9 . Suitable storm water retention and oil /water separation facilities must be provided per approval of the Public Works Department. 10 . The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan , existing zoning , and land uses in the area . 11 . Thirty-seven ( 37 ) parking spaces are provided for the proposed 7 ,000 square foot office building ( two floors , 3500 square feet each ) . Thirty-seven ( 37 ) spaces are required per the Parking and Loading Ordinance . 12 . The proposed parking area and circulation exceeds 10, 000 square feet. Five percent ( 5% ) interior landscaping is required by ordinance . This can be accommodated by PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF NOVEMBER 15 , 1977 PAGE FIVE RE: VALLIS INVESTORS , SA-092-77 , SITE PLAN APPROVAL IN P- 1 ZONE retention of certain trees and incorporation into the parking scheme , together with the interior landscape areas , as indicated on the site plan . Certain revisions may be necessary , depending on the final •.l,ocation of existing trees into the site and parking area landscape theme . P . PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION : Recommend approval, of the site plans subject to : 1 . Final Planning Department approval of the proposed building and parking area locations prior to commencement of clearing , grading , or construction. 2 . A detailed landscape plan must be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department. Such landscape plan shall include existing significant evergreen and deciduous trees to be pre- served and to be removed together with additional landscaping to be provided throughout the site to supplement and enhance the existing vegetation and natural character of the site. Certain plan adjustments may be necessary to enhance the natural qualities of the site and proposed development as approved by the Planning Department. 3 . As stipulated in the restrictive covenants , existing vegeta- tion shall be preserved as much as possible and incorporated into site development . No trees or vegetation shall be cut or removed without prior approval of the Planning Department . 4 . Final Planning Department approval of the building design , materials , and colors with the intent that the proposed building will enhance the natural Northwest woodland char- acter of the site. 5 . Final Public Works Department approval of suitable storm water retention and oil /water separation facilities . 6 . Final Public Works Department approval of utilities plans and related utility charges . 7 . Final Fire Department approval of fire protection facilities . 8. Planning Department approval of location and screening methods for refuse dumpster. 9. Final Planning Department and Public Works Department approval of access entry to the subject site . The proposed access should correspond as much as possible with South 175th Street on the east side of Talbot Road South and adjust accordingly on-site to save existing trees . 1 4 1 t II I ttI i i II '\- J1_ 1-::— " 1 4_ I r_i___" . I T____ -- -- . I 1--- 1 1 1 . 1 1, i.L_SRI I4IL111Ii 1.- t i . IS t4 ZS 24. : 1: 8 t9 1 33,3 ' 5 1TT *-.. 2 t • I . __I-- At-::' lnii i 1 71 -: : H 0. . • 1 f - f-- ---- ,GI Ifill 7Jt . Li _i . i ; T 74,if1__ __, 4_„,_ _ _ I pi n ; - 1I1177fil, 11 bi Hi I 1''' t___1__- . —L--1 -1- I . 1,-1,- II i .1C.-S1------- ------------ i 129 30 31:32: 33 \ 1 . I 7 i.,•.:•• ,• .37,,,I 4 ' 2. V ie 5- t 2 li ' -4., • 54Ci6 ;2:\24 I 1 cl•i r....,....1 1 1 • 11 i 1 I -I-i i I SITE APPROVAL : VALLIS INVESTORS , SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT 'MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING IN P- 1 ZONE , File No . SA-092-77 ; property located at 3713 Talbot Road South . APPLICANT VALLIS INVESTORS TOTAL AREA ±8. 7 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Talbot Road EXISTING ZONING P- 1 EXISTING USE Single Family/Undeveloped PROPOSED USE Medical /Dental Clinic COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Public/Quasi -public COMMENTS LL-7tO—V9 4 0159,iNl 9ny,4 0 9lts japr 0(4 tg:j Oo7 gill 07V°5 4' i1r,4,dsoN 7 a 1•011vA s s. 0 1=1 43 Q a O 15 giLL l 5 O Qt ,Qi > RU S11rvi7 1 a1clN N D tW+77 N11s1 et,iChs. . i.•..r‘‘,..:....:.!.E..,'.,..s'.:•..•..:•••;': 1;..•:.\......•.:.•.:::,...';..,,.:.:,::\:•.. s...::,:•,,':..'.....::•.,:.:,...'::. N....' s.1' s,‘..,' I..;.I.':".:..1i.:.,: s.••,: s..:.:.,.::,....•...,:‘,.•.::.:,!..•..,,,\:.' I.‘...:'..,\.;'..1.,1::,',.:.::‘...:',...' i1...i:‘,,,...::,..:,.:. s:[•::::.::....::.-.‘ 1,\I:.1 r vT k. 1'..!.i','.,•.:::::.:,....‘!:.:,,•.l..•...1•:;.,:i.;:.:::::..;:-.....:........!..::::...‘...1:.:.,'::.!•.:::,..1::,.i.:'.':.,..i.11.'',..1..'.:::.!..,'...:::...":•..;:::.:.:•.....i..sc.!.E..::•:::..•.I......:1:•:.•':..,•.1..,..,:.'...•...,.....':..•:‘,::::‘.‘.'.1',..,":..1!:,.....F..:".:.:...:i,•.:..:.•., 1:1..,.'•.;:::•....;:•:•1•.•::::‘.•,..,.•;.::::•if.i.:::••.........:...,::::.. i:..;...-....:•;•.;•:-. 1i,i1ii.i•:;.i..i.:.: .:ii..•...tz:*.?...,,, I,:, 5,,,,1,.,...:.". ` n. Tr. Tgin„^,:..>.'v.'?. ct asit s 15-. i 9-.3 21•11 BC co , CA: v" 1Z1A. v V w:::•.,,,,::::,,,,•*•:::„.::::i::.:::i,:..E,::::::•,.:::::.:•,•::::•:,:;.,F..,,,,,,,,,••,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,E*,.:.:,•:!,0.::::•,,iv,,,,,,.i:,:m.::,..„.:,,,,•:„.3.,.:,..,..,„,•::::,,:,„„..H,....:K,„,;.:4,,„:„,:,::,.„..„,,:,:,,„:„:„...:„.„:„.•,..„..„.i:::::::::,,,,,,ft,i;,::,,,,,,,..,•,*,....:.: •:•••:.3••,..,,,......,,,,,,,.,i,,,,,,,,F,,,,,,•••:::::: ::•,4,,,,•:• 0:iii ISiMi le' E=3 x.• k.3a 12 k'' f'>i az1af i tk i In1':.v. 51l1 e .j'3' d"<<fR!3s8 , i,:X<:!!i`'; >':•;r.^:E<?':;':`"' IS ff-iit 1 1}5. . 449 93".0 ' ru s , Elf,t ef Qols- p_ 14) Ea fal - 8ty y'' , Sb Hip Q AC QtuQZ:0af> kA 0 .r ':. ri ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : Finance Department Fire Department Library Department OPark Department r Police Department Public Works Department Building Div . Traffic Engineering Div . Engineering Div . ieUtilities Engineering Div . FROM : Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) Yvt( 14 NE.. 1 4 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 77 Application No . : 6-_ - 02. - 77 Action Name : \A LL..1$ [Ai VE,'1D j '1 4.3 Afeleai o/4 c_ go i2 Please review the attached . Review requested by ( date) : /0 2 77 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : 1 Department : iPpiJ aA-thi, Comments : a 774:fed, Signature of Di rector fr Au' ;ori zed R A.f" sentati ve Date ' REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : C,( 1l/`/ S Comments :4.1, Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 6-76 OVER) REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : 1 Department : 2/ Ara Comments : J/ rJ Signature of Director or Authorize Representative Da e REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : 3 77 Signature o Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : 0 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date INTER-OFFICE MEmo To: MI CHAEL SMITH , PLANNING DEPT . DATE OCT 31, 19Z7 FROM: KURT PEDERSEN , FIRE PREVENTION SUBJECT: VALL I S INVESTORS , (site plan approval ) FOR FIRE PROTECTION AT THIS SITE, IT WILL REQUIRE A FIRE HYDRANT TO BE WITHIN 150 FEET OF THE BUILDING, WITH 2000 G.P .M. REQUIRED , KP/j eb OF R2. • Pg\\IE4 our 31 1971 o ------------- 1 i PROPOSED/FIN/.- DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICAN., /NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No .SA-092-77 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-285-77 EX FINAL Declaration Description of proposal To obtain approval of site plans, landscaping, and eieiaf.ions_ for a proposed 7,000 square foot two=level medical office building on approximately 1.2 acres of a •total 8.2 acre site. Proposed office is initial phaseofaproposedclinic, campus-type deveompentonthetotalsite. Proponent VALLIS INVESTORS Location of Proposal Vicinity of 3713 Talbot Road South immediately south of South 37th Street. Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to ® have ®x not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS ® is x is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) ( c ) . This decision was ma e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : This declaration 4 is based on development of the site consistent with the existing vegetation and natural character of the site and incorporation of these elements within site development. Retention of the natural characteristics of the site, as per the restrictive covenants, . is required ..to protect the quality of the environment of the area and reducing potential impacts to surrounding properties. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency wouldwithdrawitsdeclarationofsignificanceandissuea ( proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen Title Planning irect Date November 4 , 1977 Signature v G' Ci ty of Renton Planning Department 5 - 76 a DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE_ CO'/LEANTS I•'IIF:Rl=AS, I•li i i iam Stewart Pope and Ll len White Pope , his wife , are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton , County of King , State of Washincit.on , described as follows : that portion of the southeast quarter of Section 30 , l ownsh i p 23 North , range 5 Last , W. M. , in King County Washington : Beginning at the south quarter corner 42 of said section 30 ; thence north along the north e.) and `;ouch center" line Of Said section .30 , a distance of 250 feet.; thence north 89o06 ' 03" east 950 feet to the true point of beginning ; thence north parallel to the north and south center line of said section 30 a distance of 421 . 49 feet to the westerly production of the southerly line of a tract of land sold on contract. to Joseph Mance and Betty Mance , his wife , recorded under Auditor ' s file No . 4687718 ; thence south 84° 17 ' 00" east along the southerly boundary of said Mance Tract and along the southerly boundary of a • tract of land conveyed to Joseph Nance and Betty Mince , his wife , by deed recorded under Auditor ' s file No . 1643926 , f113 . 77 feet , more or less , to the westerly line of the Spriughrook or Talbot: County Road ( 96th ) Avenue Southeast ) ; thence' south 6°00 ' 20 " west along the westerly line of said road 520 ' feet , more or less , to the north line of a tract of land , conveyed to Ivan G . Linbedacht and Phyllis tinbedacht. , his wife , by deed recorded under Auditor ' s file No . 1696819 ; thence along the northerly line of said Ilnhe.dtrcht Tract. north 74°39 ' 53 " west 674 . 52 feet , more or less , to an angle point in said northerly line ; thence continuing along said northerly line south 89o06 ' f13" west 105 feet to the' true point of beginning . WHEREAS, the owners of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use , present and future , of the above described real property HOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby c'staul isn , grant and -impose restrictions and covenants running r•rith the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned , their successors , heirs , and assigns , as follows : NATURAL AI•,t.AS the existing ravine and creek shall Ice preserved in i1.s ncrlural state , and no structures shall he c.orrst.rueLed lJlThin the ravine area unless 'c, l,hr_ r wise approved by the Penton Planning i)epart:ment . LANDSCAPE AREAS a ) Detailed landscape .plans , including existing RECEIVED vegetation to remain , shall be submitted to CITY OF REiVTON and approved by the Renton Planning Department HEARING EXAMINER prioror' to further development o n . t h c_ .sit.c N0V 151977 Ail PM 7 8r9r1Oc11 1l2r1 2‘3e4 5a6, EXHIBIT NO. ITEM NO0 54- .2 - 21 b ) iiinIiUm fifteen ( 15 ) foot. landscape )-)uf fors shall be added along South 37th Street and the existing fifteen ( 15 ) foot buffer along Talbot Road South shall be maintained to adequately screen and reduce impacts to adjacent residential uses prior to fur- ther development on the site . c: ) Existing vegetation shall .be maintained as much as possible . Existing vegetation shall be removed only by approval of i.he Renton Planning Department prior• to any further development or clearing on c-, the site . c SETBACKS A minimum forty (40 ) foot setback shall be maintained for all structures along the north and east property lines . HEIGHT LIMIT All buildings or structures located within one hun- dred ( 100 ) feet of the north and east property lines shall maintain a maximum heicjh't lirnit .of. two ( 2 ) stories or twenty- five ( 25 ) feet , 'whichever is less . ACCESS Access shall be limited to Talbot Road South . ( If access is allowed to South :37th Street , then twenty 20 ) feet of additional right-of-way shall be dedi - cated . DEVELOPMENT PLANS All site development plans , including those of public or quasi -public institut. ions , shall be approved by the Renton Planning Commission . I)UIRATION These covenants shall run with the land and expir '' on December 31 , 2020 . Any violat. ion or breach of th:.f,r re , trIc ivr covenants niay he enforced by I ro: Pr I '''H 1 I'rnc c'dir re':. i H r I,rH Superior Court of King t:omit..y by c. I t hor i hc? ( i Ly ni I: i1r11: or any property owuc' C , a(I,ioininq ',object prnl,(or I.y who ore adversely affected by said breach . William Stewart. Pope Ellen White Pope STAVE 01 WASH I NG-i ON ) COUNTY 0f KING On this day of 19 : ; 'before me per sonally appeared and the persons who executed the within and foregoing instrument . and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned . IN WITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written . 4-1 Notary Public in ail fpr the e CD of Washington , resod iatit1C':1;:4 D fct.• Recor;1 at Roclias..! Z• t c'•: 44-t1,4 CI Ain I •\,‘ '-••t11. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 15 , 1977 APPLICANT : VALLIS INVESTORS FILE NO. : SA-092-77 , SITE PLAN APPRQVALyIN A P-1 ZONE A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests approval of site plans , landscaping , and eleva- tions for a proposed 7 ,000 square foot two-level medical office building on approximately 1 . 2 acres of a total 8 . 2 acre site . The proposed office is the initial phase of a proposed clinic , campus-type development on the total site . B. GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : VALLIS INVESTORS 2 . Applicant: VALLIS INVESTORS 3. Location : Property located in the vicinity of 3713 Talbot Road South immediately south of South 37th Street . 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5. Size of Property : Approximately 8 . 3 acres total - pro- posed initial phase approximately 1 . 2 acres . 6 . Access : Via Talbot Road South 7 . Existing Zoning : P-1 , Public Use District . 8 . Existing Zoning P-1 , Public Use District ; SR- 1 , in the area : Single Family Residence ; G-9600 , General Classification District . 9 . Comprehensive Public and Quasi -public . Land Use Plan : 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record- Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . Notice was distri - buted to the surrounding property owners . C . PURPOSE OF REQUEST: To allow initial phase development of a proposed total campus- type medical clinic complex . D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed to the City. on April 15 , 1959 , by Ordinance No . 1743 . The Comprehensive Plan An the area was studied and amended on October 22 , 1974 . The subject site was rezoned to P-1 on July 11 , 1975 , by Ordinance No . 2944 . Certain restrictive covenants dealing with retention of the natural character of the site. and ravine area , together with certain developmental requirements , were filed on July 23 , 1975 , and run with the land. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF NOVEMBER 15 , 1977 PAGE TWO RE : VALLIS INVESTORS , SA-092-77 , SITE PLAN APPROVAL IN P- 1 ZONE E . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography : The northeast portion of the site is relatively level . The southerly portion of the site contains an exist- ing ravine area with steep slopes averaging approximately 35 percent. The westerly half of the site generally slopes downward toward the west at an approximate ten percent grade. 2 . Soils : A majority of the site consists of Indianola Loamy Fine Sand ( InC ) . This soil has rapid permeability ; available water capacity is moderate ; runoff is slow to medium; and erosion hazard is slight to moderate . This soil is used for timber and for urban development. The ravine area consists of Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC) . Runoff is medium, and erosion hazard is severe . The slippage poten- tial is moderate . This Alderwood Soil is used mostly for timber. This soil does not appear to be appropriate for urban-type development. 3. Vegetation : There are a number of significant evergreen and deciduous trees , both on the level areas of the site around the existing residence and within the ravine area . The restrictive covenants (see attached ) designate the existing significant trees and the ravine area for preser- vation and incorporation into the development of the site . The ravine area is to be preserved in its natural woodland- type vegetation or enhanced with suitable native-type vegetation . 4 . Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site may provide some habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water : There is an existing year-around stream located near the bottom of the ravine area near the southerly portion of the subject site . 6 . Land Use : There is an existing single family residence located on the subject site . There are existing clinics located south and southeast of the subject site. Valley General Hospital is located approximately 1/8 mile south of the subject site . There are existing single family residences located directly north of the subject site on the north side of South 37th Street and east of the subject site on the east side of Talbot . Road South . Except for the one existing single family residence , the subject site is undeveloped . F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area is characterized by a mixture of single family residences and public/quasi -public uses in the form of the Hospital and supportive medical clinics . G. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : There is an existing 20 inch water main located along Talbot Road South and an existing Metro sewer gravity line located along South 37th Street and Talbot Road South . Storm sewers are not available in the area . There are drainage ditches , however, and any development on the site will be subject to suitable storm water reten- tion and oil /water separation facilities prior to out-flow from the site. 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . See attached memorandum. Ij PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF NOVEMBER 15 , 1977 PAGE FOUR RE : VALLIS INVESTORS , SA-092-77 , SITE PLAN APPROVAL IN P-1 ZONE Copies of certain memoranda and comments are attached. 0. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The site plan as proposed appears to be consistent with the restrictive covenants (see attached ) for the site , except that existing trees have not been indicated. These must be indicated, and any trees needing removal must be approved by the Planning Department. Final plan approval may require minor shifts in parking and building arrangements to save the existing trees and site character. The parking areas should be planned and grouped around the existing trees as much as possible. 2 . The proposed plan is consistent with the minimum setbacks established by ordinance and the restrictive covenants . 3. The proposed plan is the initial phase of a campus-type clinic development proposed for the entire site. All subsequent phases are subject to covenant and ordinance standards and will require similar. site plan approval by the Planning Department staff and Land Use Hearing Examiner. 4. The proposal is generally consistent with the minimum land- scape buffering requirements of the covenants and ordinance . However , specific landscape plans indicating trees to be removed or retained , together with additional landscaping , have not been submitted. These plans must be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department prior to develop- ment on the site as per the restrictive covenants . 5 . It is the Planning Department ' s determination that the proposed plan does not significantly extend into the ravine area and is , therefore , consistent with covenant requirements . 6 . The proposed building does not exceed the height limit established by covenant . However, it must be stressed that building design be of a character that is compatible with the Northwest woodland nature of the site . Final building design should be subject to Planning Department review and approval . 7 . Suitable access is provided via Talbot Road only, thereby assuring consistency with covenant requirements . 8. Suitable utilities are available to the subject site. However, specific design and changes should be approved by the Public Works Department. 9 . Suitable storm water retention and oil /water separation facilities must be provided per approval of the Public Works Department . 10 . The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan , existing zoning , and land uses in the area . 11 . Thirty-seven ( 37 ) parking spaces are provided for the proposed 7 ,000 square foot office building ( two floors , 3500 square feet each ) . Thirty-seven ( 37 ) spaces are required per the Parking and Loading Ordinance . 12 . The proposed parking area and circulation exceeds 10 , 000 square feet. Five percent ( 5% ) interior landscaping is required by ordinance . This can be accommodated by r / PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF NOVEMBER 15 , 1977 PAGE FIVE RE: VALLIS INVESTORS , SA-092-77 , SITE PLAN APPROVAL IN P- 1 ZONE retention of certain trees and incorporation into the parking scheme, together with the interior landscape areas , as indicated on the site plan . Certain revisions may be necessary , depending on the final .location of existing trees into the site and parking area landscape theme . P . PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION : Recommend approval of the site plans subject to : 1 . Final Planning Department approval of the proposed building and parking area locations prior to commencement of clearing , grading , or construction . 2 . A detailed landscape plan must be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department. Such landscape plan shall include existing significant evergreen and deciduous trees to be pre- served and to be removed together with additional landscaping to be provided throughout the site to supplement and enhance the existing vegetation and natural character of the site . Certain plan adjustments may be necessary to enhance the natural qualities of the site and proposed development as approved by the Planning Department. 3 . As stipulated in the restrictive covenants , existing vegeta- tion shall be preserved as much as possible and incorporated into site development . No trees or vegetation shall be cut or removed without prior approval of the Planning Department. 4 . Final Planning Department approval of the building design , materials , and colors with the intent that the proposed building will enhance the natural Northwest woodland char- acter of the site. 5. Final Public Works Department approval of suitable storm water retention and oil /water separation facilities . 6 . Final Public Works Department approval of utilities plans and related utility charges . 7 . Final Fire Department approval of fire protection facilities . 8. Planning Department approval of location and screening methods for refuse dumpster. 9. Final Planning Department and Public Works Department approval of access entry to the subject site . The proposed access should correspond as much as possible with South 175th Street on the east side of Talbot Road South and adjust accordingly on-site to save existing trees . 14iks\. J t) +'fi‘. 7 ,1 7•_-____-_ ____-__-____ __,I 1 i,. L ___, . i., _,- ,L_- SR'I iC 9 l tY 1— a 4[ 440 393B . 96Qc t I G. ur I 2 Q 4 1 — 1— Y 3 . I I i 1I2- g sT Z I fi 7 7 77- f . lr l y r J 7. j slS2 97,4 ^b' 322 S! S3\. 43 i i DOj, o/ II; BI 921 222 —dL4418I20 III 0 J— I 1 MOM G R-2 1.I I 1 SITE APPROVAL : VALLIS INVESTORS , SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT .MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING IN P- 1 ZONE , File No. SA-092-77 ; property located at 3713 Talbot Road South. APPLICANT VALLIS INVESTORS TOTAL AREA ±8. 7 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Talbot Road EXISTING ZONING P- 1 EXISTING USE Single Family/Undeveloped PROPOSED USE Medical /Dental Clinic COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Public/Quasi -public COMMENTS oojoEl :4 0° '' a o S ,11111iiiiiiiminisitari, ate le 3a 3 9 Tt 20 C7 f13 0tics 8 s Ss.f. F i74rri sr r,. YMY';;Ml c: o:,yo;..•;.::. :.r:.:;.::yy c...c::.; y.:;:..o;..y.>.::ay 0oy.:>.r.:y:;: g,\`:> y: .:.;: b .. ....:.:...: may/isy.:.. i h zb z; w44 gtir`zy D MSyy,, 7sCO4lF)...1.1.11:1;.•.1:!..:.i.:...ii:;!:!.':.':!..!..:,,,,. F:.;,,,,,,...„,,,,,,:w,....,,,,I.:::.:::;:,,,f,:,:,,,x.:::::.,,,V,i:::.:::::,..?i*f.:::::::?,,,,::2,,*:,,..,::,%,:':'''',.',..,:''.::'.,,..?..',:' '''..'''''''''''....''''':'....'''''' isP' "(EDr: hi\.\ • f WO. 1:1 E::1 a. ISTtNCr. OLIN!C L/MIrS n® • 73 91Egj 4 S /11i1f 51' 0 Cl m Q co::'0 C;3 w y.Cy GENE t- NosprrAtr CAL /0200' rii=3 J l 511E V; ti/Auii. prvE5rORs 091-79 ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : Finance Department Fire Department Library Department OPark Department r 2 Police Department Public Works Department Building Div . Traffic Engineering Div . Engineering Div . i Utilities Engineering Div . FROM : Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) M( An- 644 t 2; SUBJECT : Review of ECF- ,'' ' -77 Application No . : , -_14— O?Z - 77 Action Name :____V4`.C.i, INVas'rak II i2 CLarJIC. 1A. JWIP I—I 7-490E Please review the attached . Review requested by ( date) : /0 21/77 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : d"` /PY%,/), Comments : O P1 7 AC:(1.1.40!!!!1_4:, K- a'2:5'777 Signature of Di rector(fr Au on zed Rit~ sentati ve Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 1--(C.l 't (/' Comments : G Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 6-76 OVER) REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : V Ala Comments : r n177SignatureofDirectororAuthorizeRepresentativeDae REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : 1a -SI -77 Signature o Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date INTER-OFFICE MEMO TO: MI CHAEL SMITH , PLANNING DEPT . DATE OCT 31 , 1977 FROM: KURT PEDERSEN, FIRE PREVENTION SUBJECT: VALL I S INVESTORS , (site plan approval ) FOR FIRE PROTECTION AT THIS SITE, IT WILL REQUIRE A FIRE HYDRANT TO BE WITHIN 150 FEET OF THE BUILDING, WITH 2O00 G.P.M. REQUIRED . KP/jeb ig POO OCT 31 1971 44//, G i+ I /1 v _ PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/ivuN-SIGNIFICANCE Application No .SA-092-77 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-285-77 X FINAL Declaration Description of proposal To obtain approval of site plans, landscaping, and eleiati_ons_ for a_proposed 7,000 square foot two=level medical office building on approximately 1.2 acres of a •total 8.2 acre site. Proposed office is initial phase of a proposed clinic, campus-type development on the total site. Proponent VALLIS INVESTORS Location of Proposal Vicinity of 3713 Talbot Road South immediately south of South 37th Street . Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to ® have not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS ® is x is not required under. RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) ( c ) . This decision was ma-de after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : This declaration is based on development of the site consistent with the existing vegetation and natural character of the site and incorporation of these elements within site development. Retention of the natural characteristics of the site, as per the restrictive covenants, is required ' to p,ro.tect the quality of the environment of the area and reducing potential impacts to surrounding properties. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen Title Plann ' ng irect Date November 4 , 1977 Signature G City of Penton Planning Department 5 -76 I N 1 LULJ AP T" UTAL HVIEW i\EOUEST TO : PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR BUILDING DIVISION ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION UTILITIES DIVISION tip FIRE DEPARTMENT HEALTH DEPARTMENT FROM : PLANNING DEPARTMENT )4IGtt1T't4 • Contact Person R E : I rJV g`3fc7R. ' ' T pL,e L) A p ce"./AL, o cu`7 I P- I Zic 1r SA- on -7 7 Please review the attached information regarding the subject proposal and return it to the Planning Department by D/24-(77 with your written recommendation . Your response will be included as part of the staff report to the Hearing Examiner. s Thank you , PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4_..// Date /o y®/7J INTER-OFFICE MEMO To: MI CHAEL SMITH , PLANNING DEPT . DATE OCT 31 ,. - 19]7 FROM: KURT PEDERSEN , FIRE PREVENTION SUBJECT: VALLIS INVESTORS , (site plan approval ) FOR FIRE PROTECTION AT THIS SITE, IT WILL REQUIRE A FIRE HYDRANT TO BE WITHIN 150 FEET OF THE BUILDING, WITH 2000 G.P.M. REQUIRED. KP/jeb R t>4* o fit RECF_\\IE.-1) 11/16, v OCT 311971 471 41G DEp / I I, 10 ,.,,. -:r. 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 O C) o w `"r ° CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 041-fO SEPIE October 31 , 1977 too: a :c Vallis Investors 1120 N . E . 2nd Bellevue, Washington 98004 RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING IN P- 1 ZONE , File No . SA-092-77 ; property located at 3713 Talbot Road South . Dear Sirs : The Renton Planning Department formallyaccepted the above mentioned application on October 21 , 1971 A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for November 15 , 1977 at 9 : 00 a . m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550 . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director By : t Michael Le/Smith Associate Planner MLS :wr cc : Leonard I . Schroeter Note : Hearing to be held in the Council Chambers , City of Renton Municipal Building . cc : Ronald E . Thompson , A. I . A. Starkovich Bros . Dr. David Burkebile Dr. Robert S.chimpf A' m,:z3=-,, o THE CITY OF RENTON U o i F., }s: 2, MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 p CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT AO 2 35-2550 4TfD SEPS - October 21 , 1977 Vallis Investors 1120 N . E . 2nd Bellevue , Washington 98004 RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING IN P- 1 ZONE , File No . SA-092-77 ; property located at 3713 Talbot Road South . Dear Sirs : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on October 21 , 1977 A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for November 8, 1977 at 9 : 00 a . m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550 . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director Michael L ." Smith Associate Planner MLS :wr cc : Leonard I . Schroeter NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND, USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON NOVEMBER 15 1977 AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . IVAN G. AND GEORGE S. WERSTIUK, File No . R-091-77 , REZONE FROM GS- 1 TO R-2 ; property located on. Kennewick Place N. E. between N . E. 30th Street and N. E. 28th Street. 2 . VALLIS INVESTORS , File No. SA-092-77 , SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING IN P- 1 ZONE; property located at 3713 Talbot Road South . Legal descriptions on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 15 , 1977 AT 9 : 00 A . M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED November 4 , 1977 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION MICHAEL L. SMITH HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to befor me, a Notary Public , i r on the \ day of h\lE'vAo\ J i - or 1.911 SIGNED ry .K''111 . ,U . c Vii/ls L7Ve5/o; Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING SS. Margaret Ha rb a ug h being first duly sworn on oath,deposes and says that she is the chief clerk of i ="-1-1,m z z is-2 S 70_ THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) Z m o O O 73 D m D !_ times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and m D Z(n m m Z-i to- o* ,• D Z c ..EhasbeenformorethansixmonthspriortothedateofpublicationreferredOrKmD0nG)O°:m to>3t Z O r-O'.to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- r e r 1_ n O 2mLiZIC) ipaperpublishedfour(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,1,o p 1 I , e.m c r•;m 0 rn =n-;and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained i':,* 0 z= Z JJ--D r O O >m m,',at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton z 0 O D. -Z v m- i z›Z D O fRecord-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Z m m z.v.00 D O •. t7 m Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, ro z'. _ i C:{ z. ' m(DC,zj ., 1mDOmkZDtn.1 Washington.That the annexed is a Notice of Public G)-I mm C Hearing o-o. '0O:4-I '::' u63"CIO ,Vv,0 i-,:(3 y`N z--12n> c.::;_m0 43O-n00)-:as it was published in regular issues(and m-r,.•`n.ro D• not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period f iy., ;W. i. z m 70 •< m a m -Z Jmv°.ogOD '':' mZ m, K.gDof1mom- s,•:n3 f omconsecutiveissues,commencing on the S• m Z 0 D co -03 Z O(o" Z 4 day of November 19 77 ,and ending the 273 zm 2(n>u) 2 5' . t.o Q TmmiOm. .0:' O t7 D D r day of 19 both dates s:'3'o y o a)'• . m-Z. . Z. 3 xi w k`-i ?7:0:-...'o.VOD<0Z '.»m a,inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub-a m O.-' v)D -1=i -I _lam-. scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee i•, ' ' n Z` ` " w O m D m g y charged for the foregoing 96 aco fin m o o m o m m 3 ogggpublicationisthesumof $ .. which o.m 33 y< po--i m : > >..has been paid in full per folio of on the rate of e hundred werfolioofonehundredwords ords for each subseor the uent o m aD ,X-'- O it m'D 513 -c z'first insertion and insertion. 4 a_g° m -+mr'zm v= Pr.l m3 ° z 07oc mcnT mm; Chief Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this 4 day of November 19 77 y-' p c • R ENTO Notary f ',. cd G-' DoaryPuhlicidfortheStateofWmgton, s. o residing at Kent, Ki• g'County. ti CJ V 0lgi1 Np F" Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955. o Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures,Q-adopted by the.newspapers of the State.QNGDEQ F i RECREp OF k(L.- 4- 7(.) Affidavit of Publication Nov 8 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss.9 ji V NG DEPrks- Merp:eret IT2rbsu `.h being first duly sworn on oath,deposes and says that she is the Chief Clerk of THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE,a newspaper published four(4) times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, NOTICEOF and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained PUBL'IG'FIEARINGattheaforesaidplaceofpublicationofsaidnewspaper.That the Renton HENTONALAND IJSERecord-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the HEARING EXAMINERSuperiorCourtoftheCountyinwhichitispublished,to-wit,King County, I RENTQN;WASHINGTON A -PUB'LI'C HEARING Washington.That the annexed is a . Not 1 c e o I 'ub l i C WILL BE'MELD.BY THE H ARI GNEXAMINER AT t.ie g r i n HIS REGULAR MEETING ' IN THE C: R.::: UNCIL CHAM- BERS, CITY HALL, RE- as it was published in regular issues(and NTON,WASHINGTON,ON not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period NOVEMBER 8, 1977, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETI-i1TIONS: of consecutive issues,commencing on the 1. VALLIS INVESTORS, i File No. SA-092-77; 2 day of O V e t b e r 19 7 7 and ending the SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT MED- II ICAL OFFICE BUILD- ; ING IN P-1 ZONE:prop- 1 day of 19 ,both dates erty located at 3713 Tal- inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub bot.Road South. Legal scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee description on file in thb Renton Planning De- 1,. 30 partment. charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ which ALL INTERESTED has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the PERSONS TO SAID-IfirstinsertionandperfolioofonehundredwordsforeachsubsequentPETITIONSAREIN- insertion. VITED TO BE PRE- SENT AT THIS PUBLIC i HEARING ON ! i••• V••• NOVEMBER 8, 1977 AT 9:00 A.M. TO EX- Chie : Clerk POENSSS. THEIR OPI- Gordon Y. Ericksen Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 day of I Renton Planning Director t Published ih•TherRemton Record-Chroh?ic'IeNovember1977November2, 1977:04696' Notary Public q d for the State of Washi, e-e.} k.. ng n, residing at Kent, King Co nty. l Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955. G4 dC, Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, a.e / tea o —--Gl adopted by the newspapers of the State. 4 ' 72 t e.2/ G 7//c 7 7 . V.P.C.Form No.87 iu 1ICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON NOVEMBER 8 1977 , AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . VALLIS INVESTORS , File No. SA-092-77 ; SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING IN P- 1 ZONE; property located at 3713 Talbot Road South . Legal description on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 8 , 1977 AT 9 : 00 A . M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED October 28, 1977 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , MICHAEL L . SMITH HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public , on t h e ,_,x5-12J d ay of „6) e—c. % 19 77 SIGNED 'r' e,c;/"( ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : Finance Department Fire Department 0 Library Department OPark Department Police Department Public Works Department Building Div . 00 Traffic Engineering Div . Engineering Div . i Utilities Engineering Div . FROM : Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) 14 t- 6m I'TF4 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- ,1.7 ' -77 Application No . : ,0-, — OyZ - 77 Action Name : A Ll-1, I& t./EMI BLS! ‘ I TL'Ft..A43 X p ea/A L ro il- cL c.. l k o f Zoot U Please review the attached . Review requested by ( date) : /o 7f77 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 91 e.CP 1, Comments : ,a , ®,',!/vim 7 i f0 2c /7 Signature of Director r Au prized R sentative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 1--(C( '( (/f, .S Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 6-76 OVER) REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : F,L/Z-- IL C /N6 Comments : I/ice brfrip.2e r , H / 2".2 Signature of Director or Authorize Representative Da j REVIEW .BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : N\. e.l D. Id -'$ 1 -7 Signature o Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date CITY OF RENTON • 4r9,ID 0 APPLICATION OCT 1F1 SITE' APPROVAL o --..... ----------- FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 1/VG ®E :., . File No. SA- (29.2 -77 Filing Date AV. -6 Application Fee $ %o,, Receipt No . Z1 6 Environmental Review Fee $tij/ 'ems APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH• 6 : ff 1 . Name VAL Lt' I}J\/' c Rf Phone 'l'55- J4 9"E'. Address, 11120 J E '2,t I I—L-L vU E \ILlls 2 . Property location @a 7 ' 5 `j,.L T R4b. 7 R&-NT0 rJ 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) EaE- 4 . Number of acres or square feet 6.'`J ,000t FT Present zoning (- I 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? ` IVMt PI l-- flCi 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) 7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION : Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal 'Action Remarks Planning D ft . Rev, 1-72' VALLIS INVESTORS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Beginning at the south quarter corner of said section 30; thence north along the north and south center line of said section 30, a distance of 250 feet; thence north 89°06'03" east. 950 feet to the true point of beginning; thence north parallel to the north and south center line of said section 30 a distance of 421.49 feet of the westerly production of the southerly line of a tract of land sold on contract to Joseph Mance and Betty Mance, his wife, recorded under Auditor's file No. 4687718; thence south 84°17'00" east along the southerly boundary of said Mance Tract and along the southerly boundary of a tract of land conveyed to Joseph Mance and Betty Mance, his wife, by deed recorded under Auditor's file No. 4643926, 813.77 feet, more or less, to the westerly line of the Springbrook or Talbot County Road (96th Avenue South- east); thence south 6°00'20" west along the westerly line of said road 520 feet, more or less, to the south line of a tract of land, conveyed to Ivan G. Unbedacht and Phyllis Unbedacht, his wife, by deed recorded under Auditor's file No. . 4696849; thence along the northerly line of said Unbedacht Tract north 74°39'53" west 674.52 feet, more or less, to an angle point in said northly line; thence continuing along said northerly line south 89°06'03" west 105 feet to the true point of beginning in the southeast quarter of sec- tion 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 E. , W.M. , in King County, Washington. That portion of the above described tract beginning at the Northeast corner thence south along east line 215 feet to true point of beginning;. thence southwesterly, 195 feet to a point 235 feet south of the north line; thence south parallel to the east line of said described tract to a point on south line; thence southeasterly along south line to the southeast corner of said described tract; thence northerly along east line to the true point of beginning. Subject to an easement for ingress, egress and utilities purposes, over the north 15 feet of above described portion of said tract, together with an easement for ingress, egress and utilitiy purposes over the south 15 feet of north 215 feet sold to L.R. Frary. 1 i AFFIDAVIT I , 1/a 4 a Av0/410Azt , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the ro ert involved in this application and that thePYPP foregoing statement and answers herein .contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me thisi.# day of n 19 7:7 , Notary Public in and for t e State of Washington, residing a ,e,A4L.u ' . d6 • Gl t lS/. Ze9.4, .4uti i J441A14444.0%ri', Ai. 6/.47 • Flame of Notary Public) Signature Owner) / q/ L v," 7 - i,," / -"1:24 i,, D 4 CP Address) Address) ed°4-64- it 71,, State) Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing -application has been inspected by me and has been found to re--to. ough and complete in every particular andto conform to the rule aadhr.regilations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filif of0uOdh afp"Zication . 6...'' 1 ti Vie\\ r,^- Date Received O;.i ; 1g77 , ..9 By: V, zyNDE13 Renton Planning Dept . 9 2-73 CITY OF RENTON, WASH V` 1y INGTON r. . . _. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1, FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application "!o. 7 'j RI/ t s0o E. T. ALAIC 0Fro aer Environmental Checklist No ,C~Le/""'Ff cCF z - 3/ PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date : ElDeclaration of Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance El Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS : Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major.actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required , or where, you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided , or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local -agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions flay not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND I . Name of Proponent V.64LLtS 1PVE5To 2. Address and phone number_ of Proponent : E 1120 1,101 r", 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist Csl`r of To 5. Name of proposal ; if applicable : M tCnt- IGS FOR' Die. DAvto 'auizc 11. PR tF 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope, and nature) : or ec0 Corzt, 01-:1 4.1 hpprLo tr2 Azrz€ I rJ T*i C., r9r, ESi. VALvo z7.-7JSoo 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land 'area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : ti 4Ta App .h TE azze < T±± 60trril 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : 10. DO•you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? I'f yes , explain: 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain: 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed , but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in : a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil ? X , YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? YES MAYBE NO d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES MAYBE NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? YES MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay , inlet or lake? l',B tac,5 IiJ ® c.rz 'l4try YES MAYBE NO Explanation: l 1-0 Tice, PD(-) 4:Noc Per o ae, /srze.71, otis T1+1:: Srre -Jc rto g,6..p 0. 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of 'ambient air quality?X YES M YBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? YES MAYBE NO c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? C YES RATIENB f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: is.I 1J- : rZ©M i` 5Z-Q& 4 Pp2}<f i.56. TAKE GM1r 1 ,-76--J/Lat.) s-T Ns ge c-ri 1 Gu7,®#). 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs , grass , crops', microflora and aquatic plants)? YES MAYBE 0 b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? YES MAYBE 0 c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species?g YES MAYBE W d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Yam- MAYBE NO Explanation: 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of ,species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? AYES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of. new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YES MAYBE 0 d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? _ YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in : a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE 110 b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE 0 Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: . 11) ' Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? YEn- MAYBE N Explanation: a ' 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YES MAYBE TIT— d)Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? L_ YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substanti'al . amounts of fuel or energy? X YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? l YES TIME NO Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? a* YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems?X YES MAYBE NO c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO g': 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? x YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage? x YES Farriff NO Solid waste and disposal? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? YES MAYBE W Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? c YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES. MAYBE NO Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon s checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willfu lack of fu is losure on my part. Proponent: signed sL..p E.`-'bierwfsaa. name printed) City of Renton ` Planning Department 5-76 4, rY N .. ..,y i'Vc r... 7 , • I L EN FILE.TITLE Iy 1 N may. J i'_i I " 1 pr' ..k r If,.•4f e,.e L • r .1 J x r