Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA78-178 start of file
BEGINNING OF FILIcRoFLMED FILE TITLE 60 8 ove,t4 417; rL4t .<;;;., V)1, b))\ t(1 , 6,e/6 r\P) v 6:(/4 eaA41-° "77 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Star Machinery Company is the owner of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: Legal Description attached) WHEREAS, the owners of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desize to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property in order to obtain a permit to fill the described property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: LANDFILL OPERATIONS Erosion control measures such as hydroseeding, if necessary, shall be approved by the Planning and Public Works Departments, City of Renton, to afford maximum protection from siltation of adjacent properties and drainage ways. Appropriate dust and mud control measures shall be taken as required by the Public Works Department. Coordination of the final elevation of the landfill with the northerly adjacent properties per approval of the Public Works Department shall be required. Landfill operations shall be completed within one year. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES Traffic control devices as required by the Public Works Department shall be provided. FINAL DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Final approval of the uses and site plan for the property shall be required by the Hearing Examiner after conducting a public hearing. Submittal of rehabilitation plans with the special permit application for development of the site shall be required. OTHER APPROVALS Final approval of the proposal by the King County Department of Hydraulics Division of the Flood Zone Control Permit shall be required. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be enterei as a judgment in said action. 7 LE,4,--Z7(----- J n B. Rabel, Star Machinery Company STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING 4. On this \- day of C1 1978, before me personally appeared SO\,n Ej • .apc' 1 , the person who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official sea] the day and year first above written. IliAja) 1 f\ • \ 4iLL- Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in 1;t,h an l 1 i r/ 2- ATTACHMENT Legal Description for Star Machinery Company: The following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington: That portion of Government Lot 2 AND the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, lying Easterly of West Valley Road and Westerly of Puget Sound Electric Railway right of way and lying between lines 150 feet and 480 feet North of measured at right angles thereto and parallel to the North line of Henry Adams Donation Land Claim No. 43; EXCEPT that portion thereof lying within State Highway No. SR 181. ALSO that portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at a point 30 feet North and 735.75 feet West of the Northeast corner of Henry Adams Donation Land Claim No. 43; thence North 123 feet to a line which is 150 feet North of and parallel with said North line; thence West along said parallel line 60 feet; thence South 120 feet; thence East 60 feet to the point of beginning. Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. SUBJECT TO: Assessments which the grantee herein agrees to assume and pay according to terms and conditions therein, said assessments are as follows: LID No. 269, Parcel 15 dated October 13, 1971; LID No. 285, Parcel 6 dated February 17, 1975; and LID No. 269, Parcel 34, all to the City of Renton. SUBJECT TO: Easement to City of Renton for public utilities dated November 4, 1970 and recorded December 23, 1970 under Auditor's File No. 6726577; Easement to City of Renton for public utilities dated November 4, 1970 and recorded December 23, 1970 under Auditor's File No. 6726578; Easement to City of Renton for public utilities dated September 24, 1971 and recorded October 5, 1971 under Recording No. 7110050389. of R, A a0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 p CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER O Q, L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 O0Q. tt0 SE Pl . May 16, 1978 Mr. Lance Mueller 130 Lakeside Seattle, WA 98122 RE: File No. SP-178-78; Star Machinery Company. Dear Mr. Mueller: This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of May 1, 1978, has not been appealed within the time period set by ordinance, and therefore, this application is considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing. Restrictive covenants will be filed with King County. Si rter lye, L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department DECLARATION OF! RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Star Machinery Company is the owner of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: Legal Description attached) WHEREAS, the owners of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property in order to obtain a permit to fill the described property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: LANDFILL OPERATIONS Erosion control measures such as hydroseeding, if necessary, shall be approved by the Planning and Public Works Departments, City of Renton, to afford maximum protection from siltation of adjacent properties and drainage ways. Appropriate dust and mud control measures shall be taken as required by the Public Works Department. Coordination of the final elevation of the landfill with the northerly adjacent properties per approval of the Public Works Department shall be required. Landfill operations shall be completed within one year. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES Traffic control devices as required by the Public Works Department shall be provided. FINAL DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Final approval of the uses and site plan for the property shall be required by the Hearing Examiner after conducting a public hearing. Submittal of rehabilitation plans with the special permit application for development of the site shall be required. OTHER APPROVALS Final approval of the proposal by the King County Department of Hydraulics Division of the Flood Zone Control Permit shall be required. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in said action. n B. Rabel, Star Machinery Company STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING 1On this day of C1 1978, before me personally appeared SOv‘ g. a pc3` the person who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. r\ • \O'-kL• Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in cZvh on 1 2- w ATTACHMENT Legal Description for Star Machinery Company: The following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington: That portion of Government Lot 2 AND the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, lying Easterly of West Valley Road and Westerly of Puget Sound Electric Railway right of way and lying between lines 150 feet and 480 feet North of measured at right angles thereto and parallel to the North line of Henry Adams Donation Land Claim No. 43; EXCEPT that portion thereof lying within State Highway No. SR ldl. ALSO that portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at a point 30 feet North and 735.75 feet West of the Northeast corner of Henry Adams Donation Land Claim No. 43; thence North 120 feet to a line which is 150 feet North of and parallel with said North line; thence West along said parallel line 60 feet; thence South 120 feet; thence East 60 feet to the point of beginning. Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. SUBJECT TO: Assessments which the grantee herein agrees to assume and pay according to terms and conditions therein, said assessments are as follows: LID No. 269, Parcel 15 dated October 13, 1971; LID No. 285, Parcel 6 dated February 17, 1975; and LID No. 269, Parcel 34, all to the City of Renton. SUBJECT TO: Easement to City of Renton for public utilities dated November 4, 1970 and recorded December 23, 1970 under Auditor's File No. 6726577; Easement to City of Renton for public utilities dated November 4, 1970 and recorded December 23, 1970 under Auditor's File No. 6726578; Easement to City of Renton for public utilities dated September 24, 1971 and recorded October 5, 1971 under Recording No. 7110050389. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 1st day of May 1978 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. A SkSubscribedandswornthis day ofZ 19 "(c . kkVA Notary Public in and for t e 1St.ate of Washington, residing at Renton Application, Petition or Case: Star Machinery Co. , SP-178-78 The mtnu,tee contain a tat o6 the panti,eb 196 necond) May 1, 1978 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION . APPLICANT: Star Machinery Company FILE NO. SP-178-78 LOCATION: Property located approximately 120 feet north of S.W. 43rd along the east side of West Valley Road. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests approval of a special permit for fill and grade to prepare the site for planned future development. Preload of building area only. ) SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the REPORT:Examiner on April 19, 1978. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on April 25, 1978 at 11:20 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map Exhibit #3: Site Plan with Sections and Drainage Exhibit #4: Letter from Lance P. Mueller to Planning Department, dated April 19, 1978 Exhibit #5: Memorandum from Donald G. Monaghan to Hearing Examiner, dated April 24, 1978 The Examiner asked the representative for the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was: Lance Mueller 130 Lakeside Seattle, WA 98122 Mr. Mueller indicated his concurrence but wished to address requirements for drainage plans denoted in section P.8 of Exhibit #1. He indicated that upon receipt of final site approval, drainage plans will be coordinated with divisions of the city and submitted for approval. He referred to previous projects which his architectural firm had accomplished in areas adjacent to the subject property and reported his intent to provide similar plans for design and storm drainage for the project. He requested approval of the special permit subject to sulmittal of the final drainage plans at a later date upon final development. Mr. Mueller also questioned the intent of recommendations noted in Sections 0.13 and P.4 relating to control of dust and mud on the 60-foot access roadway, noting the applicant's intent to utilize crushed rock in lieu of permanent paving on the right- of-way. Mr. Smith responded that due to previous problems associated with fill and grade operations, the Public Works Department is responsible for reviewing impacts relating to adjacent properties and considering proposed methods to reduce such impact such as treatment or surfacing of the roadway. The Examiner noted a method of water sprinkling which had been previously utilized for this purpose. I SP-178-78 Page Two The Examiner asked for testimony in support or opposition to the request. There was no response. The Examiner then asked Mr. Smith if the proposal meets landfill composition equirements of the ordinance. Mr. Smith reported that the proposed granular-typ preload material meets ordinance requirements for compaction and is acceptable. Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding requirements for an additional s ecial permit prior to further development, Mr. Smith advised that the subject spec al permit would allow surcharge operations for the building site, and that subsequent application for building permit would allow a certain amount of on- site construction including fill and grade procedures under the requirements of the Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance. He noted that if additional excavation totaling over 500 cubic yards other than the proposed preload was planned prior to issuance of 4 building permit, application for an additional special permit for fill and grade would be required. In response to the Examiner's inquiry regarding participation of the applicant in a proposed local improvement district on West Valley Road for installation of a left- turn lane, Mr. Smith reported that the property owner would be required to participate. The Examine inquired if methods of erosion control such as hydroseeding would be included as art of Planning Department requirements. Mr. Smith reported placement of straw ba es surrounding the detention pond in the outer area and sufficient proposed buffering surrounding the entire preload for erosion mitigation purposes. The Examiner asked Mr. Moeller if the applicant was amenable to hydroseeding requirements on the slopes of the preload. Mr. Mueller responded that because construction on the preload area would occur within three months after approval of the special permit, the maximum height of the preload was only seven to eight feet, and natural runoff generated by a 30,000 sq. ft. area or 11,000 cubic yards of surcharge would not be significant, he felt hydroseedin/ would not be practical or necessary. He also reported that a 60-foot area south of the surcharge operation would remain in a natural state. The Examine) noted that the time limit established in Exhibit #1 for completion of the proposed fi 1 and grade process in a maximum three-year period could be easily met by the applica t. Mr. Mueller agreed and reiterated previous comments relating to commencemen of construction in mid-summer, 1978 following receipt of shoreline permit approval. he Examiner asked Mr. Smith if the applicant's intent of eliminating hydroseeding procedures was acceptable to the department. Mr. Smith indicated departmental concurrence. The Examiner asked for further testimony. Since there was none, the hearing on File No. SP-178-78 was closed by the Examiner at 11:50 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner nOw makes and enters the following: I FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a special permit for a landfill of about 11,000 cubic yards. 2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, is un4ontested) , and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report'Iby reference as set forth in full therein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. The proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, lot coverage and height requi ements of Sections 4-730 (M-P) and 4-2314 of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances. 8. A special permit is required for development and use of the site per Section 4-2302.2. 9. Rehab litation of the site is required per Section 4-2306. The architect indicated that onstruction of the proposed building is to begin as soon as possible after issua ce of the Shoreline Management Permit. Plans for rehabilitation of the site can b- included during review of the special permit for the proposed building. r SP-178-78 Page Three 1C. The landfill operation is scheduled for completion in three months (Section 4-2307.3) . 11. An annual license from the Planning and Public Works Departments is required per Sections 4-2307.2.B, 4-2307.4, 4-2310 and 4-2309. 12. During the operation the requirements of Section 4-2312, Work in Progress, must be met. Access is proposed via a portion of the property abutting S.W. 43rd Street which is acceptable to the Public Works Department. 13. Storm drainage plans (Exhibits #3 and #4) have been submitted per Sections 4-2307.5.E, 4-2313 and 4-2318 and found by the Public Works Department to conform to the requirements of these sections as well as Ordinance No. 3174 (Exhibit #5) . 14, Banks of the slopes meet the requirements of Sections 4-2312.1 and 4-2316.6 per staff comments on Exhibit #3. 15 The fill material conforms to the criteria of Section 4-2316.4. 16 Erosion control per Sections 4-2312.10, 4-2313, 4-2318.2 and 4-2319 will be provided by straw bales and the existing and remaining, undisturbed, easterly portion of the site. 17. The wildlife habitat mitigation requirements of Resolution No. 1923 are met via the existing undisturbed portions of the property. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposal conforms to the Comprehensive Plan and Shoreline Management Master Program. 2. The operation will ". . .not be an unreasonable detriment to the surrounding area. . . " Section 4-2303.2.B) provided certain conditions are met. 3. For purposes of flood control, the elevation of the final grade of the fill should conform to that of the northerly properties. 4. Dust must be minimized on the access road (Section 4-2312) . 5. The Public Works Department should review whether or not traffic control measures are required at the intersection of the access road and S.W. 43rd Street. 6. Additional review of the need to hydroseed the slopes of the landfill is necessary. 7. The landfill is reasonable and appropriate for development purposes (Section 7.08.01.F; Shoreline Master Program) . DECISION: Baled upon the record, testimony, findings and conclusions, it is the decision of the Examiner to approve the requested special permit (Exhibits #3 and #4) subject to: 1. Coordination of the final elevation of the landfill with the northerly adjacent properties per approval of the Public Works Department. 2. Appropriate dust and mud control measures as required by the Public Works Department. 3. Provision of traffic control devices as required by the Public Works Department. 4. Inclusion of hydroseeding the landfill slopes per approval of the Planning and Public Works Departments. 5. Approval of the King County Flood Zone Control Permit and Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit. 6. Submittal of rehabilitation plans with the special permit application for development of the site. 7. Completion of the landfill operation within one year. 8. Compliance with all provisions of Chapter 23. 9. Inclusion of the abovementioned conditions in restrictive covenants that are signed by appropriate parties. 4, SP-178-78 Page Four ORDERED THIS 1st day of May, 1978. i i eeler Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSM14I'TED THIS 1st day of May, 1978 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Lance Mueller, 130 Lakeside, Seattle, WA 98122 TRANSMITTED THIS 1st day of May, 1978 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Councilwoman Patricia Seymour-Thorpe Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant t Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed i writing on or before May 15, 1978. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision o the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen ( 4) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the pecific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of he record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal o the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such ppeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting of er specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said office. Y INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date April 24, 1978 TO: L. Rick Beeler Mike Smith FROM: Donald G. Monaghan SUBJECT: Star Machinery Company, Fill and Grading Permit Subsequent to our preliminary review for the above referenced permit request, Mr. Lance Mueller the architect on the project submitted a letter dated April 19, 1978 which correctly addresses our concerns regarding storm drain- age in the area. A copy of this letter is attached for your review. 47/ 1: DGM:pmp Attachment RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON TEARING EXAMINER APR25197 1 M PM rXHIBIT NO. T i819^111121112 g314,5 6 ITEM NO. r /7F 11 r lance mueller associates architects April 19, 1978 f( O \\ tVI cittElqb Mr. Mike Smith APR 20 1978 h- Rl-a-r ii .De aft c n i . CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South 1 Renton, Washington 98055 y1°/ D Re: STAR MACHINERY COMPANY FILL AND GRADING PERMIT Dear Mike, I understand there is concern by the City and neighboring property owners that our surcharge operation will cause additional runoff onto neighboring property to the South. There are two phases of construction; Surcharge and General Construction under a building permit. During the Surcharge phase, for which we are currently seeking a special permit, the contractor will construct a ditch or dam, as required, along the down slope side of the surcharge work. This will channel all runoff from the surcharge pad to a settlement pond constructed in accordance with your Engineering Department's requirements. This runoff will then flow to the existing drainage ditch at the east end of the property, which flows north and ul- timately into the drainage basin between the railroad tracks. For the Construction phase, and necessarily after site plan approval , we will retain a consulting engineer, probably Harstad Associates, to design the storm retention/detention system in cooperation with, and meeting the requirements of, your engineer- ing department, as we did on the "Truckweld Site" to the North. All of the above work will be constructed in a manner to prevent new runoff to the property to the South. RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER f— APR 2 51978 EXHIBIT NO. AM PM 71- 71819110111112111213,4 t7i6 ITEM NO• A 130 lakeside • suite f • aeattle, washington 98122 (208) 325-2853 lance mueller ale,cal •associates: robert olechewsky, eileen furney w TI sS ?iw iR=.+.esw w... .ems...S'- ot Rem \.. L:w^S f<+1""L R. i lance mueller associates architects April 19, 1978 Mike Smith - - - - - -- CITY OF RENTON Page Two We are very much aware of the drainage problems of this area and are prepared to work with the City of Renton to satisfy your concerns and help process the necessary approvals in the most expeditious manner. Thank you for your interest and concern. Sincerely, LANC MUELLE ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS i v j ance P. Mueller, A. I.A. V President LPM/f cc: Star Machinery Co. M.A. Segale Co. 130 lakeside a suite f • seattle, washington 98122 (20B) 325-2653 lance mueller aia,cal •associates:robert olschewsky,eileen furneyawesninatonnnronratinnfurnl.hlna.ow.pi.i4-....e.....I ,........i.....rl.........s-+...44.4.-1.14,- ... w-a.....-.......,.,..i., :s.,,,.,,>-.-T RECEIVED CITY OF RED NEARKG ;EXAMINER APR 2 51978 PLANNING DEPARTMENT AM PM 7.8 9.r,11&1Zi1,2a3a415,6 PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 25 , 197 EXHIBIT NO. / APPLICANT :STAR MACHINERY COMP ITEMEM NO. 7,F- ?g` FILE NO . : SP- 178-73 , SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FILL AND GRADE A . SUMMARY OF REQUEST : Applicant requests approval of a Special . Permit for fill and grade to prepare the site for planned future development . ( Preload of building area only . ) B . GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : John B . Rabel 2 . Applicant :Star Machinery (John Rabel ) 3 . Location : Property located approximately 120 feet north of SW 43rd along the east side of West Valley Road . 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5. Size of Property : Approximately 7 acres . 6. Access : Via West Valley Road and SW 43rd Street . 7 . Existing Zoning : M-P , Manufacturing Park . 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : M-P , Manufacturing Park , B- 1 , Business Use , G , General Classification , H- 1 , Heavy Industry 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Manufacturing Park 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three ( 3 ) places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance . C . PURPOSE OF REQUEST : To allow fill and preload of the subject site in preparation for development D . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City of Renton on April 14 , 1959 by Ordinance Number 1745 . The site was rezoned to M-P , Manufacturing Park on May 9 , 1977 , by Ordinance Number 3I34 • E . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography : The site is relatively level . 2 . Soils : Puyallup fine sand loam ( Py ) , permeability is moderately rapid , runoff is slow, and erosion hazard is slight . Seasonal high water table. Soil is used for row crips pasture and urban develop- ment . Newberg silt loam ( Ng ) , permeability is moderate , runoff is slow, erosion hazard is slight. Seasonal high water table . Soil used for pasture row crops . Woodinville silt loam (Wo ) - permeability is moderately slow, runoff is slow , hazard of erosion is slight . 1hi ; soil used for pasture row crops and urban development. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF APRIL 25 , 1978 PAGE TWO RE : STAR MACHINERY COMPANY , SP_ 178-78 , SPEC-IAL__PERMI_T FOR FILL_AND GRADE 3 . Vegetation : Scrub grass and brush . 4 . Wildlife : Existing vegetation may provide some habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water : No streams were apparent on the subject site . The site is subject to seasonal high water table . 6. Land Use : The property directly north of the subject site is filled but presently undeveloped . Existing homes and bi4sinesses are locatei south of the subject site along SW 43rd Street. The puget power right of way and railroad mainline tracks are located directly eat of the subject site . F . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The general area is experiencing a transition from undeveloped land to commercial / industrial uses . G . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : An eight inch sanitary sewer is located along the puget power right-of-way, a twelve inch water main is located along West Valley Road , and a storm drainage ditch is located along the puget power right-of-way . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per Ordinance requirements . 3 . Transit : Metro Transit route 155 operates along SW 43rd Street . 4 . Schools : Not applicable . 5. Parks : Not applicable . H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : I ! 1 . Chapter 23 , Mining , Excavation , and Grading . 2 . Section 4-730, Manufacturing Park . It . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR i OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1 . Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan , June 1976. id . IMPACTS ON NATURAL SYSTEMS : Fill and development of the subject site will disturb existing soil and vegetation , increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area . However , these can be mitigated by proper development controls and procedures . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS : HI Not applicable . I . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : II ' Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State I ' .. Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43 . 21C , a Declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal . This declaration is for fill and preload only and is further based on provi i n of adequate storm drainage plans that ensure protection of adjacent property to the south . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT 70 HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF APRIL 25 , 1978 PAGE THREE RE : STAR MACHINERY (_OMPANY , SP- 178-78 , SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FILL AND GRADE M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : A vicinity map and a site map are attached . N . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . King County Division of Hydraulics 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division 3. City of Renton Utilities Division 4 . City of Renton Traffic: Engineering Division Copies of certain memoranda and comments are attached . 0 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The subject site is zoned M-P , Manufacturing Park . 2 . The proposa '+ is for preload of the site to permit anticipated development of a construction equipment sales , rental , and service facility. Such development will require specific site plan approval per the M-P zone , a special permit for bulk storage , and a shoreline substantial development permit. Plans are presently being prepared . 3 . The proposed preload is subject to the State Flood Zone Control Permit requirements . Any approval should be subject to the approval of such perrri t . 4 . The property adjacent to the site on the north is presently filled . 5. The property south of the subject site is zoned B- 1 , Business use . Storm drainage plans should be designed so as to prevent impacts to these adjacent properties . ( See Engineering Division comments . ) 6. The proposed fill and surcharge will be placed in the area of the proposed building to a height of approximately four feet above the proposed finished floor elevation of 24 feet . Existing elevation ranges from approximately 21 feet to 23 feet . The proposed elevations are above the recommended 21 . 8 flood proof elevation established ty the Army Corps of Engineers . 7 . The ultimate elevation of the entire site development should be con- sistant with that of other fills in the vicinity north of the subject site. 8 . The temporary drainage plan has been reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department . A retention pond and natural flow to an i existing ditch along the Puget Power right-of-way directly east of the subject site is proposed . i ; 9. The landscaping requirement established through agreement with the Soil Conservation Service providing for two percent of the site to rj be landscaped suitable for wildlife food and/or habitat will be included in the site development plans . Also the easterly approximate one third of the subject site will not be immediately filled and developed . 10. A soils engineering report has been provided with the subject appli - si cation . Materials and compaction rate appear to meet ordinance standards . 11 . Section 4-2312 , Work in Progress , outlines work methods that may be necessary too control dust and mud on and off the site . All city streets must be kept clean and free of debris from the operation . Additional traffic control measures may be required by the Public Works Department if necessary to mitigate traffic problems during the operation . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT FO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF APRIL 25 , 1978 PAGE FOUR RE : STAR MACHINERY COMPANY , SP-178-78 , SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FILL AND GRADE 12 . Those areas and slopes not anticipated for immediate 4evelopment shall be appropriately rehabilitated by hydroseeding 6r landscaping per Section 4-2312 . 10 and 4-2306 . 13 . The proposel sixty foot access to SW 43rd Street should be approprii: teU surfaced to reduce impacts to adjacent properties and city streets per approval of the Public Works Department . P . PLANNING DEPART1ENT RECOMMENDATIONS : Recommend approval of the proposed fill and grade for a maximum three year period subject to : 1 . Approval of the State Flood Zone Control Permit by King County Division of Hydraulics . 2 . Coordinatiol of final site , grades , and elevation with adjacent properties it the time of specific site development review. ( i . e ., site plan approval and special permit . ) 3 . Hearing Examiner ' s approval of ;specific site development plans . 4 . Methods to :ontrol dust and mud shall be approved by the Public Works Department . Streets shall be kept free of mud , dust , and debris at all times . 5 . Additional traffic control measures as needed per approval of the Public Work ; Department . 6 . Suitable surfacing of proposed access road to SW 43rd Street per approval of the Public Works Department . 7 . Slopes and Areas not anticipated for immediate development shall be rehabilitated , if necessary , per approval of the Planning Department . The two per:ent soil conservation service site landscaping requirement RES. #1923 ) shall be incorporated into proposed site development plans . 8 . Final Publi : Works Department approval of drainage plans which include methods to arevent impacts to adjacent properties . III II is r i:ii il_ ....r....1•INMNY r....riw.r lu..bw.....rwrr xuurr...rr -r.uwwu.rrirr....u.r...y._.._........., -. 3 1 W 4 I),. F I, l` i I I y I 0. i I i V 1 i en.F ) Jr • , 1 o N4 !! I H ..II 19 )l W y , w 1H-414-- 3,, 1 I V lullliI0 Sulsrci• 1 r .411.4 Ni-....-.T..........JTM• .. xw.o-.... . ra.........1C....9ItP.i4..... .....,... Xii.: j--- -;:j . v: I I M—P o iiigi lib, N Z ezt I11' I u i SPECIAL PERMIT : STAR MACHINERY CCPIPANY , APPL.ICATION _FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FIll AND GRADE IN M-P ZONE , FilE No . SP- 173-78 ; propert cayloted approximately 120 -reet north of S . W . 431 (1 Street along the west side of West Walley Road . w....••••.. Mil pw APPLICANT STI R MACHINERY COMPANY TOTAL AREA ±7 acres PRINCIPAL ACCI.iSS West Val1e,_Road and S . W . 43rd Street EXISTING ZONING M-P , Manufacturing Park EXISTING USE Undeveloped PROPOSED USE rill and Grade For proposed constructiqn equipment .:2l1es , rental and service facility . COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manuf.AL.turi ng Park COMMENTS i I;: 1 LI 1 \ e01 ',r)1 14Mlr5 4 i M - P 1 .: '. it,,.,FBI. 0 1 i rn v. it....;tt. \\\\\:::\: 1111\11.i 11\ 4 °le 1141 ' il, \( 111‘ cit I k' 1 \ I\ kid \\ 3f • r a 10 ii IS 1 i ar 144- i iiii i ii • ' I 4 • wok • for • roe• mar • moo • SU • rrr• arse ru• • w. am1. • 1 11:/% 11 e \------- i it' rle r sr. ie sr sr. I.r5 0 0 1.1 0. MikiL___I .,,,..> 73 1 l 1 i 1 tN. 14 I •r. , I f r P` ! i i' sc*Le. l'• too'A 5USJECr serf (WW srmit rnAcHIIw y Il Ij SPECIAt. PERMIT No. SP-gi , .g 11 i PROPOSED/FI \L DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . si.. 1711_2$ PROPOSED Declaration Environmental CtEcllist No, 331-78 0 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal _IpeciAl Permit -for fill and surclharge__f. r.___ p r op.SQd f u t u.rl ik v e.i n p.rne n.f_-— ----- —- -- --- Proponent Macilin t ry_4 m p a n y ------ Location of Profcsz l _.__Aapr.oxvnately .12.4_ fegt_u _r_th of_SW _4;i_cd _atreet along east side of West Valley Road . Lead Agency This proposal has teen determined to 0 have 0 not hive a significant advers€ impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is is not requirec: under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) ( c ) . This decision was made after revien ty the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Non Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : This declaration is f o r f:i 1 1 n d_grA.d.E—R_Q.rti_Q n _4a.va ln.p.ment_unl and is further basEdor_orovision of___Sai-t blg Landscaping and drainage control measures._s1_.p a r_ii_.o.f s it_g d e v g1.op .en f. .t_c_m i t i g a_te3js of__.wil_d l i f e habitat and potential storm drainage impscts . ___.__._-___— Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/ final ) declaration of non- significance : Responsible Officia Gordon Y . Erickagn.____ Title i e, o Date A p r i l _ 19, J.9 7 8 --_----_. Signatur - /,v , City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 I 4; iry.. wnr ra,r...r ..—_ ......_..._... - -y.w.a._..+.,Liun...,.......G.ar. _..j ..._.a... ROUTING F( R 10VIr:li OF EUVIRONME:NIAL_ CHE:CKLIST FORMS TO : F1 na 1cc C,epa r•tment Fire DcpE,rtment Library Department Park Dc partment Poll Department Public Works Department r;4 Building Div . Traffic Engineering Di v . r,J Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering 'Di v :S .. FROM : Planninj Cepartrnent , ( signed by responsible official car nIs designee ) 1GQa4 s_.___. .!...__S_I_A TA_._.. .____-__.__...... SUBJECT : Review :IF ECF - ___-' 1.:_Ve _; Application No . : 1 1 •M - 7: _._. Action lane :___` A e.-... 1=!itg..0.3-r.... i Please review the :attached . Review requested by ( date ) : _i' i---/ __ __ Itf.VlEtd BY OTHER C : I'YDEPARTM Departm.?rit c .7v .- ,,..". ,si a.. 7r.--c,..,, UKer../ Comments : i cgnature o 1 rector T 1iJ °" t1t 'e Date 4';'"It'-4.1e e': cieLir,---—_ U BY OTHER C:I TY DEPARTMENTS : Depar•tir.,'it. : t Common f 1 Dug /_ 7he. ,'.%,;,4iGa/ CJ re,ir;ry'e 17ra'Z/'7,s.5 /,.' ' are 4-, a-zy oae-rd//ci/Z?/,24,i,e j'/e1. . oe. ,// .ri1n,r Aid of 'r /C.d Pi--,c' p TAD 3A'VttJ /yJt'T t" 5007154, y t 4 *1'/' c € / iA/ p/:lc,egi/m>v n/ j 16,a */ ei eicode t T,,2y)e. r'°:s. I i tiL ognature f D I .cctor or ilutit ri a ite; i t:i ve Tale i' I n. , I ' 1 , N. V11.1: 1;'," i DEPARTMEN : Departi ion • it. Commen Aif,o c 7,- LI 7Z- 1-'t 11 Signature of Dii rector or Authori zed1 Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER ( ). P DEPARTMENTS : Departnc!n Comments : Signature of El rector or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Departmc:n12 ------ Comments : Signature of D: rector or Authori zed Reprei;“?..Piat. iiii Date r.):: OTHER CIT DEPARTMENTS : i !Departmont : Comment tt, : 1 rinature of Iiirc7ctor or Authori zed Repri,i,t1t iv ; P , ' U 7 c. Sf,'r PLANNI; .:;i G :E'ARTMEUT DATE ROUTED 7 1 //.1_ P .I::ASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATIO:; FOR : R;:ZO:JE MAJOR PLAT S :TE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT4S — 17; —7Y i S i'''''_ \L R t 1 i ST&F, xlAc iLM1:z--1!__•• WAIVER. t:LI: z MANAGEMENT I R;IIT OR EXEMPTION ANE RE:TUR:d TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT pi i ITI A:,.Y COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE i L3 Zzi SIGNATUREIIOR —.9IN;T , 1 DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE I tUILDIII V 277"-- -,2 r- TRAFFIC ENG . 7 ' g ENGI:IEERIt,G i FIRE HEALTH is R:VIZ !ER ' S 2Of"::•1ENTS OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS : PLEASE SIt.:;N THE E ? b! iii I I a 1,, 1 it 1 lance mueller aE sociates architects April 19, 1978 1/k ,0\fh Mr. Mike Smith it A?R 20 1tft II Planning Department f-1! CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: STAR MACHINERY COMPANY FILL AND GRADING PERMIT Dear Mike, I understand there is concern by the City and neighboring property owners that our surcharge operation will cause additional runoff onto neighboring property to the South. There are two phases of construction; Surcharge and General Construction under a building permit. During the Surcharge phase, for which we are currently seeking a special permit, the contractor will construct a ditch or dam, as required, along the down slope side of the surcharge work. This will channel all runoff from the surcharge pad to a settlement pond constructed in accordance with your Engineering Department's requirements. This runoff will then flow to the existing drainage ditch at the east end of the property, which flows north and ul- timately into the drainage basin between the railroad tracks. For the Construction phase, and necessarily after site plan approval , we will retain a consulting engineer, probably Harstad Associates, to design the storm retention/detention system in cooperation with, and meeting the requirements of, your engineer- ing department, as we did on the "Truckweld Site" to the North. All of the above work will be constructed in a manner to prevent new runoff to the property to the South. 130 lakeside • suite f • Seattle, washington 98122 (206] 325.2553 lance mueller aia, csi • associates: robert olschewsky, eileen furney a was'}a: :- n corporation furnishing architectural services by and under the supervision of registered architects I • - lance mueller associates architects April 19, 1978 Mr. Mike Smith CITY OF RENTON Page Two We are very much aware of the drainage problems of this area and are prepared to work with the City of Renton to satisfy your concerns and help process the necessary approvals in the most expeditious manner. Thank you for your interest and concern. Sincerely, LANCF MUELLER.—ik ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS V lance P. Mueller, A. I.A. v' President LPM/f cc: Star Machinery Co. M.A. Segale Co. 130 lakeside • suite f • Seattle, washington 96122 (206) 325-2553 lance mueller aia, csi • associates:robert olschewsky.eileen furneyawashingtoncorporationfurnishingarchitecturalservicesbyandunderthesupervisionof registered architects a lance mueller associates architects April 19, 1 `,Ifl Mr. Mike Smith CITY OF REN T ON Page Two we are very mut..h awal e of the drainage problems of this area and are prepared to work with the City of Renton to satisfy your concerns and help process the necessary approvals in the most expeditious manner. Thank you for your interest and concern. Sincerely, LANCE MUELLER--A ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS lance P. Mueller, A. I.A. President LPM/f cc: Star Machinery Co. M.A. Segale Co. 130 lakeside • suite f • Seattle, washington 58122 (2063 325-2553 lance mueller aim,csi •associates:robert olschewsky.elleen furney s..,.,:w:..n ,...r:hitectural services by and under the supervision of regbtarred N'OMLINtCLG -- f la ce mueller associates architects April 19, 1978 r ,‘C/3+`N Mr. Mike Smith AM 20 W18 Tanning Depalct It CITYCITY OF RENT0N p ...---• ti i _1 I LI 1 V1 200 Mill Avenue Smith Renton, Washington 98055 a.• STAR mACHINFRY rfMPANY FILL AND GRADING PERMIT Dear Mike, I understand there is concern by the City and neighboring property owners that our surcharge operation will cause addi t i nal runoff onto neighboring property to the South. There are two phases of construction; Surcharge and General Construction under a building permit. During the Surcharge phase, for which we are currently seeking a special permit, the contractor will construct a ditch or dam, as required, along the down slope side of the surcharge work. This will channel all runoff from the surcharge pad to a settlement pond constructed in accordance with your Engineering Department's requirements. This runoff will then flow to the existing drainage ditch at the east end of the property, which flows north and ul- timately into the drainage basin between the railroad tracks. For the Construction phase, and necessarily after site plan approval , we will retain a consulting engineer, probably Harstad Associates, to design the storm retention detention system in cooperation with, and meeting the requirements of, your engineer- ing department, as we did on the "Truckweld Site" to the North. All of the above work will be constructed in a manner to prevent new runoff to the property to the South. 130 lakeside • suite f • Seattle, washington 98122 (208) 325.2553 lance mueller aia,csi •associates:robert otschowsky,eiieen furney t-,, -,,V7--e 7-s,r-. .----.!- -uicfs 15., er-e-..!+-4rr l+e-e-,cr +-1,3 R esf pee eetr-wird wroNtteata of RENT CITY OF RENTON 6V-1) (2 APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT v ppR g 1918 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY A ter_.•- 6 0 Sp etioPQ` C File No . SP- ,i4 / Y Fee 7o ( PP D Date Rec' d : 3/li Receipt No. 171. -?/ APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1. Name gf'rt/l, UIMacato e_,0 Phone (cZ3 .016,0 Address p. 0 . 1110)4. 3S t WA 2. Property location - ,:>> '( Ij c9 U4-c, bf(,U' ' 2 Pr 13f. Igo s . w 3. Legal description attac • dditional sheet if necessary) 4 . Number of acres or sq. ft. Present zoning mip 5. What do you propose to develop on this property? SAS 10Atit Gtl. t OtJ NA 6. The following information shall be submitted with this application: Scale A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , existing structures , easements, and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B: L Parking, landscaping and screening plan . .1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels)1" = 200 ' - 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) E • A special permit required by the Renton Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in Section 4-2307 . 5 in addition to the above . L.A...uOscmdc o G0 -4r> (Qze S U pao I -tfi t IMo c !fit Leto QD a SttW ct1O ) 7. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Date approved Date denied Date appealed Appeal action Remarks Planning Dept . 2-73 revised 1- 74 n hand paid,conveys and warrants to STAR MACHINERY COMPANY , as Nominee for undisclosed principals he following described real estate, situated in the County of King State of Washington: That portion of Government Lot 2 AND the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, lying Easterly of West Valley Road and Westerly of Puget Sound Electric Railway right of way and lying between lines150feetand480feetNorthofmeasuredatrightanglestheretoandparalleltotheNorthline of Henry Adams Donation Land Claim No. 43; EXCEPT that portion thereof lying within State Highway No . SR 181 . ALSO that portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, described as follows : Beginning at a point 30 feet North and 735.75 feet West of the Northeast corner of Henry Adams Donation Land Claim Lhencen North gOsaidt arrallelneline1ch is 60 feet; O feetthencef ySoultho120 and feet; parallelthencewithEastsaid60 feet line; thence West along P to the point of beginning . Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. SUBJECT TO: Assessments which the grantee herein agrees to assume and pay according to terms and condtions therein, said assessments are as follows : LID No . 269, Parcel 15 dated October 13, 1971 ; LID No. 285, Parcel 6 dated February 17, 1975; and LID No. 269, Parcel 34, all to City of Renton; SUBJECT TO: oembr to, 1City and Rentonrecordedfor December utilities 23, 1970 under November 4, 19 Auditor's File No. 6726577; Easement to CityO ard Rentonrecordedfor Decbmberu 231t1970dunder November 4, 19 Auditor's File No. 6726578; Easement to Ci1971fandnrecorde publicOctobert5i'ties 1971 dated September 24, Recording No. 7110050389 . RECEIVED o APR . 3 1978 ti NG DEPPC AFFIDAVIT being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 51 day of a/Ontl/0- 191 j Notary Public in and for t S to of Washington, residing at__ V Ime of Notary Public) ignature of Owner1 3o L114/- (IC 2 -t-t'Z 1)421.. D . 3 s6tS Address) Address) City) State) S3 . 016'O Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certi y th e foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been f n(! i' to 41/ rough and complete in every particular and to conform to th 'ru _Li lations of the Renton Planning Department governing th `i1 r _ sue , pplication . V APR 3 1918 Date Receive 19 By: NGDEV Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 ROGER LOWE ASSOCIATES ERRTF ES August 4, 1977 RECEIVED APR 3 1978 Mr. John Rabel 9 Star Machinery Company Box 3595 NG pEpP Seattle, Washington 98124 Foundation Investigation Proposed Repair and Display Building Star Machinery Company RLA Project No. 240-01 Dear Mr. Rable: INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our foundation investigation for the proposed repair and display building for Star Machinery Company. The site is located on the east side of the West Valley Road and north of South 180th Street as shown on the attached Plot Plan, Plate 1 . The purpose of our investigation is to evaluate the subsurface con- ditions as a basis for recommendations regarding site development and foundation design criteria. Our work included four test borings , field and laboratory soils testing, and engineering analysis. The scope of our work is described in our proposal letter of April 7, 1977, which, was authorized by your purchase order number 35777 dated July 13, 1977. The finished floor slab elevation and structural loads have not been computed. We have assumed values for these items in order to provide recommen- dations for site preparation and foundation design. When your construction plans are finalized we request that we be allowed to review our recommendations to see that they are compatible with your proposed development. The proposed building will include approximately 5,000 square feet of office space and 20,000 square feet of equipment repair and display space. Pre- liminary plans are for single story construction using tilt-up concrete walls for the repair and display area and possibly wood frame construction in the office area. Interior spans are on the order of 35 feet and the clear height to the MAIL-POST OFFICE BOX 530,MERCER ISLAND.WA 98040.TELEPHONE(206?232 5323 LOCATION: ISLAND OFFICE PLAZA.SUITE 213.2737-77th AVE.,S.E..MERCER ISLAND Y Star Machinery Company August 4, 1977 Page 2 roof is on the order of 25 feet. Slab-on-grade floors are planned throughout. The building loads would include heavy earth moving equipment and relatively light machinery. There will be no heavy concententrated loads from parts and material storage. SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The site is nearly level with a ground surface varying approximately between Elevation 20 and 24 (City of Renton Datum is used throughout this re- port). The property is vacant pasture with some areas overgrown with brush. We explored subsurface conditions by drilling four borings. The lo- cations of the borings and the proposed structure are shown on the attached Plot Plan, Plate 1 . We obtained soil samples from the borings and performed labor- atory tests on representative samples to aid in evaluating their engineering properties. A description of the field and laboratory work and the resulting data are presented in the Appendix to this report. The site is underlain by alluvial deposits of stratified silts, sands and silty sands. These deposits commonly have significant variations over rel - atively short horizontal and vertical distances, however, there is a general re- lationship among major soil strata encountered at the boring locations. There• is a layer of sod and topsoil/approximately 6 inches thick across the site. Underlying this there is a deposit of moderately compressible loose silt and fine sand extending to a depth of approximately 8 to 10 feet. From depths of approximately 10 to 20 feet there is a loose silty fine sand with occasional lenses of silt and fine sand. Underlying this is a compressible strata of soft to medium stiff silt with organics and lenses of peat which varies in thickness from about 3 to 5 feet and extends to depths of from approximately 21 to 27 feet. Below approximately 25 feet there are alternating strata of loose to medium dense fine sands and silty sands with some lenses and layers of silt. The maximum depth of exploration was 50 feet. Groundwater levels were 9 feet or more below the surface at the time our borings were completed, but water levels had probably not completely stab- ilized. The borings were drilled during the dry summer season. We know the area is subject to high groundwater levels and flooding of low areas. From our Star Machinery Company August 4, 1977 Page 3 experience we expect that groundwater levels can rise to within a foot or two of the surface. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS SITE PREPARATION AND GRADING , The ground surface in the building area ranges from about Elevation 21 to 23. We have assumed the planned finished surface of the slab-on-grade floor will be approximately Elevation 24 to 26. Prior to filling, we recommend mowing and removing vegetation. Stripp- ing of sod is not recommended except in a portion of the building area as des- cribed later. The building area and any future building addition areas should be graded to provide placement of 18 inches of select fill material beneath the slab. Before filling in the building or yard areas the subgrade should be com- pacted to a firm unyielding surface by a heavy compactor or loaded dump truck. During this operation the site should be inspected to locate any areas of soft or wet soil . These should be repaired by replacing the soft soil with select fill . Select fill for support of the floor slab should be well-graded free draining coarse sand and gravel essentially flee from organic matter or debris. The permeability of compacted fill should be 0.05 cm/sec or more. The maximum particle size should be 4 inches. No more than 5% of that portion of the soil smaller than 3/4 inch in size should pass the No. 200 sieve. Fill to support the floor slab should be placed in lifts not exceeding 8 inches in loose thick- ness and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum density. In this report maximum density refers to the maximum determined by the Modified Proctor (ASTM D-1557) method. To allow for settlement during the surcharge fill program, the select fill should be placed to a height of 12 inches above the planned subgrade elevation. Superior floor performance and dryer floors will be obtained if the subgrade fill is well drained. We recommend that perforated drain pipes be laid perforations down around the building perimeter. The drains should be located in the exterior footing backfill which should also be select fill . The drains Star Machinery Company August 4, 1977 Page 4 should be 18 inches or more below floor grade and extend to discharge to a storm drain system or to daylight at least 18 inches below floor grade. It may not be possible to perform the site preparation work as recom- mended during wet weather or periods of high groundwater levels. We recommend that you check weather forecasts and patterns and begin the work only during periods projected to have favorable weather. In severe wet weather or high groundwater conditions we recommend raising the floor grade by 6 inches and placing 24 inches of select fill . Grading should be arranged so that slopes are away from the buildings and to a storm drain system. Percolation of water into the ground does not appear feasible and may be harmful to floor and pavement support. SURCHARGE FILL Because of the variable soil conditions and irregular settlements that will occur, we recommend that a surcharge fill be used to "precompress" the site and minimize post construction settlements. By leaving a surcharge load in place for a sufficient time, total and differential settlements of the floor slab and footings can be reduced sufficiently so that the risk of post construction differential settlement damage is small . Without surcharging, either pile support is necessary or potentially serious settlement damage is likely. After completion of the surcharge program, the soil may be used as fill in paved areas. If you plan to do this, the surcharge material should be free draining soil that can be moved and recompacted in wet weather and which will provide good subgrade support. We calculate that a surcharge fill placed to a height of 4 feet above the planned floor elevation and left in place for approximately 2 months should be sufficient. The surcharge should extend at full height to at least 10 feet outside the building lines, and to at least 25 feet outside the building lines in areas of any planned future building addition. This extension is necessary to eliminate the need for a future surcharge close to and possible damaging to the planned building. Star Machinery Company August 4, 1977 Page 7 To reduce the tendency for differential settlement and cracking be- tween the floor slab and footings, the floor slab should be reinforced and structurally continuous with the footings. Provided that the floor subgrade fill is relatively free of fines as recommended, the usual capillary break can be omitted. There should be a vapor barrier beneath the slab. If desired, a 2 inch layer of sand may be placed over the vapor barrier to protect it and to provide drainage and improve curing of the concrete. SETTLEMENT BEHAVIOR Upon completion of the recommended surcharge program, we estimate settlement due to the weight of the floor slab and an average live load of 250 psf would be about 2 inch thick. If stiffening effect of the structural connec- tion between the floor slab and column footings is ignored, the computed settle- ment of the footings is 12 inches. Real differential settlement should be less, and we expect that the risk of differential settlement damage to the building is small . If your building sequence permits it, differential settlement between the building footings and floor slab could be further minimized by delaying floor slab to footing connection until after the full column dead loads are in place. We estimate differential settlement ;across the slab will be on the order of 2 inch in 50 feet. The majority of the settlements should occur within a few weeks after placing the loads. QCK M' Hek, Yours very truly, ROGER LOWE ASSOCIATES b.- y c.4,1 41.4141 s HAI..As•• • Jack . Hogan a . *74Let._ Roger if Lowe JMH/RAL/ls Attachments 4 copies submitted Star Machinary Company August 4, 1977 Page 5 Compaction of only the' lower foot of the surcharge is necessary. The remainder can be placed loosely, but we suggest compaction of the surface with smooth tired equipment or rollers so that it will tend to shed water. The surcharge should remain a place until settlements are substantially complete. Although we estimate that settlement will be complete in two or three months, the duration is difficult to compute accurately. We recommend that settlement plates be installed and monitored to evaluate the settlement of the fill . Five settlement plates should be installed at the locations shown on the Plot Plan. A sketch illustrating construction of a typical settlement plate is presented on Plate 2. The initial riser pipe is generally about 4 feet long. During filling, additional riser pipes are added so that the top of the riser is always at least about 2 feet above the fill grade. Settlement plate locations should be well marked and help protect them from damage by construction equipment. The settlement plates should be installed and an initial measurement of elevations made before filling of the site begins. Elevations should be re- ferenced to a permanent bench mark at least 200 feet outside of any area to be filled. A precision surveyors level , capable of measuring to 1/1000 of a foot, should be used to measure elevations. A second measurement should be made upon completion of the surcharge fill , and thereafter at intervals of about 1 week, 3 weeks, 5 weeks and 8 weeks after the fill has been placed, and thereafter over a month. The height of fill at each settlement plate should be recorded. Each set of level data should be referred to us for plotting and analysis. We will advise you when settlement are effectively complete and when the surcharge may be removed. FOUNDATION SUPPORT Approximately the upper 10 feet of the on-site soils are in a very loose or soft condition and should be compacted or partially replaced to support con- ventional shallow footings for columns and walls. We believe that there is a good chance that compaction can be satisfactorily accomplished and that this will be a substantial saving compared to replacement of the soil . We recommend compaction of the soils using small self propelled vibra- tory equipment. Compaction should be across an area at least twice the footing e Star Machinery Company August 4, 1977 Page 6 width, and continue until a density of at least 95% of the maximum is obtained to a depth of 12 inches below the footing subgrade. Aerating and/or sprinkling of the soil may be necessary to obtain a moisture content suitable for compac- tion. There also will be areas of silty soils which may no compact satisfactorily. These soils should be removed and replaced with clean sand. Compaction can only be accomplished during dry weather and low water level conditions. During wet weather or normal spring time high groundwater levels, we recommend overexcavation of footings to 3 feet below footing grade, and to at least 3 feet outside the footing perimeter, measured at the bottom of the excavation. The overexcavation should be backfilled with crushed rock or well graded sand and gravel containing less than 5% fines (material passing the No. 200 sieve) in that portion of the fill finer than 3/4 of an inch. Backfill below footings should be placed in layers not exceeding 12 inches in loose thick- ness and compacted to 95% of the maximum density. We estimate that the maximum interior column loads will be approximately 60 kips and the maximum wall loading will be about 2500 pounds per lineal foot. In general , footings should be as high as possible and lightly loaded to limit stresses and settlements in the deeper strata. The minimum footing width should be 4 feet for isolated or column footings and 3 feet for continuous footings. Interior footings should be founded at least one foot below the finished surface on the floor slab and exterior footings 1z feet' below the lowest adjacent grade. A design bearing pressure of 2000 pounds per square foot should be used for foot- ings founded as recommended. This bearing pressure is for combined dead and live loads including wind and siesmic forces. The weight of the footing and backfill over it may be neglected. Please call us if there are any questions concerning the suitability of bearing soils encountered during construction. SLAB-ON-GRADE FLOOR After completion of site preparation and surcharging, the subsoils should provide adequate support for the slab-on-grade floor. We recommend that the slab be designed based on a subgrade modulus of 150 pounds per squre inch per inch. z ado -, cc 1- 1dn 1S3M U 000, Q ji . % CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON O` ,E TN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Tib) OILU APR 3 1918 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY rY 2 V Application No.S/9- i711- -F VG pEQP Environmental Checklist No. .Z.'-le," -33/_fd PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date : 0 Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance EilDeclaration of Non-Significance Ell Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS : Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required , or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed , even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future . This will allow all of the agencies which will .be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future . NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question doe!: rot apply , just answer it no and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL rCHECKLIST FORM 1 . BACKGROUND 1 . Name of Proponent 1-A?--, IY\ 10v 2. Address and phone number of 1'roponent : 0'3 s'1 103 .01(00 S .fib tI W A • q%124- ---- 3. Date Checklist submitted 0 4. Agency requiring Checklist L/k-rti-__- 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate 4 understandin of its scope and nature) : pV1. V - (LA— --t-I tmt" . . __-c PAP44IC—I$G 4 Oftk0 tet. P.D t3U) t 01-(L t'- . 0n4.It-% 8ys-r& . eo nuo r PiPN.ox '761cco %' . t . B tC N P t% 4 cO 5 , Ao0 2vAwoc. pout, eoustm thopte rr-. V c1 I- Vu, Utc).DP Opt .14 o 5- - 1._.Ac S rt. 2- 1. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any ,other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : iNe PROY• -1. A& LoC44-1VO_______tit QOM*IntC• . 1560+4 q.-1--6: 0.1c 6p --(-4- . tot4., -- ial0 (3 (.9) 04tA.59 4464.411)Ft-el 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : 1Cz - --- 9. Lis of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal fe.eral , state and local --including rezones) : S Let, ftevuu(t-- *06 A.- -ILL, Illarto0 2) lq.030 C6w V Drior OF ALO&G( 1 ttt1* CO• t+ti PLAUIt,IotocpOt un tt --12Fi-ro1J 4 t ,tii { tit IT- 1C. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further activity related to or connected with this proposal ? If yes , explain : u (A1 e A j -tr' u -- 161it(IPVt7e t—t0 ttti 11 . Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by yo r proposal ? If yes , explain : 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed , but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in : a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE NO O) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil ? x YES MAYBE NO ic) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? ES MAYBE N0 d) The destruction , covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES MAYBE NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? YES MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MAYBE N Explanation: 6) ©el eikgVli W tu. COwt010- Otoar()-11060, ik4NT'MUPt.S v lw.ts f -AOtNe, t>'tt,t, (sw ( sn 10 e) %t Lot LA, 124.4.s- tO t heir " L( It,t_i grt)utLNAtt cE." -lc.,t., 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in : a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? ES M YBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? X YES MAYBE NO c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature , or any change in climate , either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: POut u&A.- At t lapfu tt-01.56 C+44-Ao t 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X_ YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature , dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MAYBENO f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? DC YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? 0( YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria , or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? 0( YES MAYBE NO Explanation: eeis-'6 ti - Q fdtAitM A'ttslA- 26U1.c ck('- 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in : a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? Y!— MAYBE 6 b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare or endangered species of flora? V MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YES MAYBE NO d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? YES MAYBE 0 Explanation: 40 - ) 4- Vr 5) Fau4a. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? Pe-N YES MAYBE NO b)' Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO c i Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YES MAYBE NO d Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE NO" Explanation: ii..) 40Stla t itt3 (0 t L4 tit O9 f -t Z111* cacti.S I t c li t r..1- 10PM Olt 0t 2kRtetA, ion guAlk & Aoitimat 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X. YES MAYBE NO E •lanation: V — __ Q vI14ttit,'Cula' MKT mist ) Qo_'1-'tw 211 7) L' .ht and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or g are? X YES MAYBE NO Eff, .lanation: 4t"tytM6V ' ._ Ll a?at-IL tt,.l. - r-0_}6- F 8) L, nd Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the p esent or planned land use of an area? Y. YES MAYBE NO E lanation: 9) atural Resources. Will the proposal result in: la) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE NO x lanation: 10) 'isk of Usset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an exp os on or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? E- M YBE NO Explanation: 11 ) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? mat- YES— MAYBE NO Explanation: m(kl' OPi vic- (1) et-Ac`ttt 4 lo Lc, ffQ to Ly eoo-t14 U-- -f-a uuv `fi r . 0.` 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE O E• planation: 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? K YES MAYBE TO-- d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? DC YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? 0 YES MATTE NO Explanation: A4itnleX 03 o —Z 5b itcOttn WOOMAgrilt PVA, (g Aei `f' PV1610 — SE-tPw — (c ( - I`L lG1-u4Ps av- O -u1 Uttt: 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? YES M YBE NO c) Schools?X YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: t/l,ES I pP( PJd Vlv 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in : a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES RATITE NO Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems , or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO c) Water? YES MAYBE NO 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES MAYBE e) Storm water drainage? YES ME WU— f) Solid waste and disposal? YES MAYBE 0- Explanation: ce) dN - S ttt- (2V1- teak Lk 1' . 1j i,t pay fitevuotit0. 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? bL YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? YES MAYBE ffxplanation: III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full d. losure on my part. Proponent: s'i e d Clk•i4.)rIAIAJ name printed) 2t P412. (Ml4e.l tL' - Go City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 Lance Mueller & Associate •chitects 7 OF QR9SRI[ITMFL 130 Lakeside, Suite F SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 DATE . 10 JOB NO. 206) 325-2553 kpco O R EA, TTb0N11 EN t , V gm - • - /,kmvF-C v I }t/-/ --- TO _ e t I i. - l p La ZW VA tw %II. 1M 1 2-( - ikati4-EN . r r. V yN~ QP gt___ (.0{, N G p GENTL EMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached Under separate cover via the following items: Shop drawings Prints Plans Samples Specifications Copy of letter Change order COPIES DATE NO.DESCRIPTION 2i9LG- cr-rAd ,t t f" 1Pf t(Arrr01J -- Dv- ce tt i,t, ONO 2 PEc_t .__ 4M (fi 2f.t,i__.I _ &metiluitip6, pciv\) i- 2 fvz..._ct(AA ") 1 ..A.r.t)A,1_10" ttt t -etkitimcceo eoctii.. wt t- 1- f-coos 8 r r THES: ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval O Approved as submitted Resubmit copies for approval For your use Approved as noted Submit copies for distribution As requested Returned for corrections Return corrected prints For review and comment FOR BIDS DUE 19 Li PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS 4 l\tkc -V/ Oetg, t&-e . — u 4,1 Mf-- MOANS Prubctna u3(-1-4. 1-itz tvi- 2 ( 4-0/1,0 a o - M 6vvr-I- w4 N Z COP" TO I SIGNED: L.-AlY.. — FORM 240-2-Available from/ EeeJ Townsend,Mass.01469 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ftf i 4F 4 t ki t IEif H- °THE CITY OF RENTON z o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL. AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 0 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI • MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 atfO SEPit°' April 13 , 1978 Star Machinery Company P . 0 . Box 3595 Seattle , Washington 98124 RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN M-P ZONE, File No. SP-178-78; property located approximately 120 feet north of S.W. 43rd Street along the west side of West Valley Road. Dear Sirs : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on April 3 , 1978 A publichearingbeforetheCityofRentonHearingExaminerhasbeen set for April 25 , 1978 at 9 : 00 a . m.. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present .All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing .If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550 . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director B y : /1/-,/ ael mith Associate Planner cc : Lance Mueller & Associates 130 Lakeside Suite F , Seattle , WA 98122 wr King County Hydraulics NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON APRIL 25 19 78 , AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . DR. MANFRED LABAND, ET AL , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A MEDICAL CLINIC IN AN R-3 ZONE , File No . SP- 148-78 ; property located on the northeast corner of Williams Avenue South and South 5th Street . 2 . JACK A. BENAROYA COMPANY , APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT WAREHOUSE FACILITY IN M-P ZONE , File No . SA- 150-70; property located on the north side of S . W . 43rd Street between Longacres Parkway and Lind Avenue S . W . k: 3 . ' STAR MACHINERY COMPANY , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN M-P ZONE , File No . SP- 178-78; property located approximately 120 feet north of S . W. 43rd Street along the Hs ` side of West Valley Road. Legal descriptions of applications noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department . I H. I. iHI ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT il THE PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 25 , 1978 AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO I.EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. , GORDON Y . ERICKSE4 PUBLISHED April 14, 1978 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION j I , MICHAEL L. SMITH HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE OPIES i i'OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS P ACES I, i ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . I 0 ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public ,I I on the 12th day of April 19_ 78 . SIGNED, . t ' il, If 1 LNDING OF FILE FILE TITLE 370 6b.„ fiff 46 78 -78 ENDING OF FILE FILE TITLE e" 8 78