Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA78-216mr, ir Las- uiNNING OF FILE FILE TITLE 8 lova/4jA, e iiik0.0if IMO 2) 1678 OF i y o THE CITY OF RENTON t$ © Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 09 235- 2550 09gr SEPT , MEMORANDUM October 3, 1979 TO: City Clerk v FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director By: David R. Clemens, Senior Planner RE :BENAROYA BUSINESS PARK BUILDINGS 1 THROUGH 7 Attached is the landscaping performance bond for Benar- oya Buildings 1 through 7. The majority of the landscaping relates to Buildings 4 through 7, and the bond should be placed in this file with a copy in the Buildings 1 through 3 file. DRC :wr Attachment cc: W. Gonnason Public Works Director 0 1 44S, Reference : Files SA-150-78 and SA-216-78 ' OCT 7979 9 RECEpir C/Ty foRENT CLERKSONd FFCE ASSIGNMENT OF FUNDS IN LIEU OF SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE BOND STATE OF WASHINGTON PROJECT: Benaroya Business Park , Renton ss. LOCATION: Bldgs. 1 through 7 COUNTY OF KING KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned does hereby a .sign, transfer and set ever unto the City of Renton all right, title a d interest in and to the sum of One Hundred Thirty-Seven Thousand Five H ndred and no/100 Dollars ( $137,500) of savings account, Account Ne . 0060 12738 8 in South Seattle Branch, Peoples National Bank s id account being in the name of Jack A. Benaroya Company, as principal , with full power and authority of the City of Renton to demand, collect aid receive said deposit and to give receipt and acquittance therefor. It is understood and agreed that the deposit will be released to the City of Renton on demand and with no other condition of release. It is further understood and agreed that Peoples National Bank holds said account in its possession and agrees to hold $137,500 until a release of this assignment is received from the City of Renton. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that the above detcribcd principal shall complete within one year all landscaping and duipster screening pursuant to plans approved by the City (Exhibit 4 to Hearing Examiner File No. SA-216-78) and to the same standards as previously approved for Buildings 1 , 2 and 3, Benaroya Business Park, Renton. In accordance with applicable City ordinances, the above sum represents 150% of the value of the work to be performed. The condition of this obligation is such that if the principal shall complete said improvements in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein, this obligation shall be released upon final acceptance of the work by the City, otherwise to main in full force and effect. L 4 Signed, sealed and dated this - day of October 1979. APPF,OYED-AS TO FORM: JACK A. BENAROYA COMPANY t, By/a.- .4.e City Attorney, City of Renton ._r f. 174' I ACCEPTANCE The undersigned hereby accepts the foregoing Assignment of Account No. 0060 12738 8in the sum of $137,500 for payment of which, well and truly to be made upon demand by the City of Renton and with no other condition of release of said deposit. We bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, a1ministrators and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents . PEOPLES NATIONAL BANK Bank) By 1 IL L. BOATMAN Its Vice President RELEASE The undersigned does hereby acknowledge that conditions of the fore- going obligation have been satisfactorily met, and hereby authorizes the r•lease of the sum of $137,500 from Account No: in this day of 1979. CITY OF RENTON By LARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENA c WHEREAS, Jack A. Benaroya Company is the owner of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: ' . See attached legal description - Exhibit "A") CV 1WHEREAS, the owner of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desi]es to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to 0 use, Ipresent and future, of the property; CD I CV I 1NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner hereby establishes, grants and imposes OD tom- restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs) and assigns, as follows: ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT Upon equest of the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner, a street is to he constructed from S.W. 41st Street to what is to be S.W. 39th Street. Said street shall be required by the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner only in the event said street is required in the final plat of Orillia Industrial Park. Furthermore, said atreet shall conform to the requirements of the final plat of Orillia Industrial Park and conform with the concept and the location specified in the approved site plan (File No. SA-216-78; Exhibit "B") for development of the buildings on the property. Construction of said street shall occur coincidentally with construction of what is to be S.W. 39th Street including that portion of the connector street lying north of the Burlington Northern right-of-way. DURATION I These covenants shall run with the land and expire at such time as the aforesaid street has either been completed or certified by the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner as not required pursuant to the final plat of Orillia Industrial Park. Lag?: B naroya, Vice Pr ident A o a CompanyJackarypy STATE pF WASHINGTON) COUNTYOF KING ) OM this /7 day of 199v , before me personally appeared Larry R. Benaroya to be known to be the Vice President of the Jack A. Benaroya Company that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said-(`n ttument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for th 4 e5; n i .,'., purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authori ceA:'Optdxtecpte', a$}d instrument for said corporation, and that the seal affixed, if any,oil 4he coriOtat4,,; seal of said corporation.14 ; .i :, Witnessrkmyhandandofficialsealheretoaffixedthedayand%yefii t'aov. written'. 0, otary Public in and for the S at I of Washington, residing in 1,UH 1 t 1'r:L1,'C.k T Y BENAROYA'6USiU S PARK, R DII y y •0f•-, That portion of the southwest quarter of Section 30, Township 23 North,Range 5 East, W.M. , and of Government Lot 1 , Section 31 , Township 23 North,Range 5 East, W.M. , and of the northeast quarter of Section 36, Township23North, Range 4 East , W.M. , and of the southeast quarter of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.t1. , all in King County, Washington, described as follows : Beginning at the southwest corner of said Section 30; thence South b9r''Oh'08" East along the south line thereof a distance of 867.18 cv feet to the west line of proposed Lind Avenue as designed underoCityofRentonLocalImprovementDistrictNo.. 302, and to the O true point of beginning; CD ccv Thence northerly along said west line and along a curve to the right having a radius of 2,040 feet, an arc distance of 25.37opfeetthroughacentralangleof00°42'46" to the south line of the right-of-way of Burlington Northern, Inc. ;' Thence North 88°55' 13" West along said south line a distance of 976.89 feet to an angle point therein; Thence Un;-th 87°31 '01 " West along said south line a distance of 1144. 10 feet to a point which lies 90. 13 feet east of the west line of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 25; Thence South 01°30'30" West parallel to said west line a distance of 25. 17 feet; Thence South 01°47 ' 51 " West a distance of 235.81 feet; Thence along a curve to the left having a radius cf 55.00 feet an arc distance of 86.78 feet through a central angle of 90024'28"; Thence South 88036'37" East a distance of 2,001 .86 feet; Thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 55.00 feet an arc distance of 86.69 feet through a central angle of 90018'38" to a point on the west line of said proposed Lind Avenue; Thence North 01004'45" Last along said west ,line a distance of 22.58 feet; Thence continuing northerly along said west line and along a curve to the right having a radius of 2,0`0.00 feet an arc distance of 196.95 feet through a central angle of 05031 '53" to the true point of beginning. i Except that portion of Springbrook Creek (Drainage District No. 1 ) , located in the westerly portion thereof as described in King County Cause:: NO. 32912. iti,Illii . fr. I i s f3I illIIi 1 Iyj 'j 1 I __I1 -1, AVMNUVd witi-womo'1 Area reserved for 1, 11.°R.1lLe.drA". • i _ 744,e,,,-,.,07,,,......tzwe.”:,:- a_---...._.„,..,______. -__......._...-__::: L.z.___: 41'f'i-r-•.'4i-34-LasF,..-4 future 60' connecto ses.:ore A A 410 rood rIght.of-ww,-:---...--L - • _ __ _ _ . . .. . 177.7.7441••••• xe.' ''..11"7 .--, - e..w•rrr.r•.,•• 'z.1 •••.-L,- . 4 il. 9Z-4%14‘ ____. . UAL_ . EaSI'' - • or a a Ei a 11,cr. _ :0 il IP. an i' L' r -'''Crrj il J 0 I t..:•::.:;.'.......r.. 471. I 1i• ,„,,.< .... 7 /4 - -. 12 1.1 1 tr. 2717. 7;....\., 744................Utr 10C,200 Izr 113,2:01111 i,%-.1 e 0.1 g ::- a i: 6 1 COO u 1.....'Fr4tf. '/ 1 .a.,.-:?, ,_ • , • 4°: y - • tio-40•A‘Alt 4 ; 474 r1P 3 SI i rri .1.• ' ._j Ad. . 11.0.....1... • Cii., i• L. s..e........:•-,C?..,A.C:.?-...... 0/0.0•40,7"0:WC,".A7 --•• 4,14;;;,..* : .7": ift •33 2r. @ 3!, .-e ;?: ... _____,''gq f' ' "?7• .;,;., ij34••••••5„,•,.7.,;• 0 LI '" _(-Lj_. — .. .-- 4. I/ • - °X4It .-; !..7.--a \ i2.,___c__.0.. . ...\. ., . ...iv, . :mays ... : : -:.r.,c2 0.-.a..,1 --TT, za.:. . _s ii-;:,..._.. ti:;;;--7..:. - : .-_,.,: .,,.,!__..__..,.._.... CC h....C.••-•-•'.L.....! 1 BMA 417 BTREBT 4=z-_-_-_-...74.__r...-7,-. -7.:....Lz_-_::-_.„--, '7 .I..:_-:.:.:_.:..... .:.:-.::::.2.-7:- - 1 .. . . • _.____.... 1 ,___\„...."_____.... ..._ ...... if j-- ---:-.2s,-) 2 ' .'1 L .' ' ..1--- --VI Li 1_1 r- _ 0 J i L-- i• 4'. t4.I i t I.. 6 i 1I i'iLguistIncr, NO 1 i udslIng 111 1..CING 2 I az tat In g,II 14.0:N C.' 3 1 1 i A G6,.i.C., i' l, AFF9r- 1: . 1•7.-e) IM SITE- PLAN4- -AS 'V cr, _ IZT 4• T.,..... ,...41, A.let•A:ta.to^CMS ACM.G". P•30.. <2,40.•••43 AAVA• i • acu,si t, 4.6e 0/4.;.....• .et.14.0,4,46.6.L..1- L-......-- ...)---- EZ--7-- 1:::-Z,L-11.Le.:..----11 rj.--:- .--11.""7.:: 41 .:-.J----'-:--)...----7:---:-.4 .. • 4 .--A 1.04..77e.•••01-.2 JAM.: 4.5,0,1 A;Pi'(.0.041..eMe.,,,••••••000C eir.s.e.I Ore!•••;!..C2re ermsc. .re•-drtL111_1 L__J [----- 17-7.J I_____i = ET 1-4 E .. L :' ie.,...C‘1.5".X.„A-.7-....0....GL •C•allaCS30,•• •WI'•••wareCiCaffs.Cilfer......0-•f 100.1C1•4.1 AtreA 1,...4›,.....aff, 1 -' I C16.......roea•ap..0.00 Acme,. .. 1..•.-4..."*.gu.....•:01 Air-: MA:1..,,,•:Cr•GC.0;::V 4c-.1.1..!000..0..i......,.1•,./1.....BLDG•4 k 1=711- (-77 -12 L-5---77 7. --1 zz-ALA'i.- :•---. 111.-----------1- .1.-- :t... . .....)1 .- -1111-=-;) k—7-4 :-. _Lt. ' tfn. I i _J 1 1 1----1 1-7 ! I i 1 1 ETi •r ; 1 _I I 1 E. 7 ! I 1 1 I i WA 1---- ! r -- BLDG•5 1 I 1 ITL7,,r4 tallitAlil _PI VILlaqil'all.. 46,- Dtp-/. BLDG-0 EXH-1151r 6 _ (/;- kii,o(iti\9ii IL-,-I -7,-----,t (---------; 1Cti1.-_-_-_-_3 C---—I; _-_---"--.. .--4-1 ......:_-z--....1- i C-----2::), l I ----7-._-7--r- 1,---A 1 1 III I I 1 E7_-, Ii i EMI I I I 1 I LVIii November 9, 1978 OFFICE OF IHE LAND JSE HEARINGEXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION . APPLICANT: Jack Benaroya Co. FILE NO. SA-216-78 LOCATION: North side of S.W. 41st Street between Longacres Parkway and Lind Avenue extension. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests approval of a warehouse facility consisting of four buildings with storage area of 302,700 square feet. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with covenants. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with covenants. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on November 1, 1978. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The rearing was opened on November 7, 1978 at 10:40 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. David Clemens, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2: Site Development Plan Exhibit #3: Site Plan with Schematic Landscaping Exhibit #4: Site Plan with Staff Comments Mr. Clemens advised that since conformance to requirements regarding provision of driveways denoted in Section P.4 of Exhibit #1 had been accomplished by the applicant, the recommendation would be deleted from the report and subsequently replaced by a requirement for bonding or provision of restrictive covenants for the future installation of a street connection of S.W. 39th Street to S.W. 41st Street if construction is deemed necessary. He also reported that installation of off-site improvements had occurred as required by Section P.5 of Exhibit #1 and the recommendation wou:..d be revised to require only added landscaping emphasis. The Examiner reported receipt of a memorandum from the Fire Chief of the Renton Fire Department which he read and entered as follows: Exhibit #5: Memorandum to Hearing Examiner from Richard Geissler, Fire Chief, dated November 3, 1978. The memorandum indicated potential emergency access problems resulting from creation of ,i 1500-foot cul-de-sac on S.W. 39th Street off of Lind Avenue S.W. , and recommended connection of S.W. 41st Street to S.W. 39th. The Examiner noted that the Fire Chief may not be aware of revised circulation plans included in the proposal. The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was: Joel Benoliel Jack Benaroya Co. 5950 6th Avenue S. Seattle, WA 98108 SA-216-78 Page Two Mr. Benoliel indicated his concurrence in the report. He submitted a reduced architectura rendering which designates an addition of four buildings to the existing three on the site. The rendering was labeled as follows by the Examiner: Exhibit #6: Reduced Architectural Rendering Mr. Benoliel reported that Exhibit #6 conforms basically to Exhibit #7, previously submitted in the public hearing held on File No. SA-150-78, which provided site approval for three existing buildings on the site. He noted a reduction in size of Building No. 6 to accomm••ate possible street connection between Buildings No. 5 and 6; and reported current deve opment for future dedication of S.W. 41st Street between Lind Avenue and Longacres Pa kway which separates Phase I and Phase II of the project. In addition, he advised t -t full development to 90-foot width of Longacres Parkway extending from the railroad right-of-way to S.W. 41st Street will occur. Mr. Benoliel eported that construction of Building No. 4 would begin immediately and subsequent de elopment would proceed to the east although occupancy in structures would not occ r until completion of off-site improvements. He noted that the Fire Chief may not be aware that provision for future connection of S.W. 41st and S.W. 39th Streets had • curred and advised consideration by Burlington-Northern for redesign of the circulati•n plan to provide consistency between both developments. Due to accelerated t'ming on the project, he requested expedition of issuance of the Examiner's decision on t e matter. The Examiner equested testimony in support or opposition to the request. There was no response. He then asked Mr. Clemens if documentation of approval of drainage plans had been received from the Public Works Department. Mr. Clemens reported that although the plans were cu rently review, he was unaware of definite approval to date. The Examiner nquired if the proposal would conform to setback and parking requirements if a connection were developed between S .W. 41st Street and S.W. 39th Street or if hardship woul•; result. Mr. Clemens confirmed provision of adequate right-of-way and required landscaping and building setbacks, and advised that no hardship other than expense of co struction of the roadway would occur. The Examiner •eferenced recent revisions to the Parking and Loading Ordinance requested by the Board of Public Works, yet to be approved by the City Council, and inquired if the applicant's plans would conform to the revised requirements of the ordinance. Mr. Clemens reported that submitted plans conform to existing as well as revised requirements. The Examiner asked the applicant if buildings proposed in the subject application were uniform in de-ign to previously approved buildings in the first phase of the project. Mr. Benoliel esponded affirmatively. The Examiner -sked Mr. Clemens if landscaping plans contained in Exhibit #3 were sufficient for review and approval. Mr. Clemens responded affirmatively. The Examiner inquired if staff comments denoted on Exhibit #4 would correct the deficiency of 2,000 squar- feet of landscaping area noted in Section 0.2 of Exhibit #1. Mr. Clemens responded affirmatively. The Examiner e tered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #7: File No. SA-150-78; Jack A. Benaroya Co. Site Approval, dated May 9, 1978. Exhibit #8: File No. PP-086-77; Glacier Park Co. ; Orillia Industrial Park of Renton, dated December 16, 1977. The Examiner r quested a final recommendation from the Planning Department. Mr. Clemens indicated that the recommendation contained in Exhibit #1 would remain as submitted with previously stated corrections regarding deletion of Section P.4 to be replaced with requirement for restrictive covenants for future connection of S.W. 39th Street; and revision to Section P.5 to require only emphasis in landscaping areas. The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No. SA-216-78 was closed by the Examiner at 11:10 a.m. III SA-216-78 Page Three FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a site plan for four additional buildings (302,700 square feet) in the Banaroya Business Park (M-P zone) . 2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, is uncontested, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Pol4.cy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Mans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the mpact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. The proposal is compatible with the setbacks, building area and height requirements of ection 4-730 (M-P) and parking and driveway requirements of Chapter 22 (Parking and Loading Ordinance) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances. Per Exhibit #4, staff recommended deletion of three driveways onto S.W. 41st Street which was acceptable to the applicant and in conformance with the Parking and Loading Ordinance. 8. With staff revisions per Exhibit #4, sufficient landscaping will be included on the site to satisfy the requirements of Resolution No. 1923 and the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan. A meandering path is recommended by staff along the westerly portion of the property. Thelpreliminary plat does not show a path along Springbrook Creek (Exhibit #7 or Exhibit #8) . However, the final plat remains to be approved for the property west Of Lind Avenue S. 9. This property was originally part of the preliminary plat of Orillia Industrial Park (PP-086-77) but was subsequently withdrawn by Burlington Northern Railroad Co. (Conclusion No. 3, Exhibit #7, SA-150-78) . Approval of the site plan for the existing portion of the Benaroya Industrial Park was conditioned upon completion of the final plat improvements within the Benaroya Company property (Exhibit #7) . 10. ['he major deviation of the proposed site plan from the approved preliminary plat Exhibit #8, PP-086-77) is the absence of a roadway connection between S.W. 39th Street and S.W. 41st Street. However, the site plan (Exhibit #2) contains sufficient area for construction of this roadway. The applicant testified that his road connection would be constructed if required in the final plat and that appropriate covenants to this effect would be signed. 11. :onstruction of S.W. 41st Street is underway. Off-site improvements are planned o be completed prior to occupancy of the buildings. 12. Che Public Works Department has not yet approved the railroad spur track locations and, the drainage plans for the proposal. 13. rhree buildings have been constructed on the southerly portion of the property Exhibit #2) . Architectural design, color and graphics will be the same for the proposed additional buildings (Exhibits #4 and 6) . 14. Per Finding No. 11, Examiner's Decision, Exhibit #7, the Benaroya Company is to complete the final plat for that company's property. Testimony regarding the subject application indicated that the company was coordinating the final plat with Burlington Northern Railroad Company. SA-216-78 Page Four CONCLUSIONS: 1. The pro sed buildings and site plan conform to the Comprehensive Plan for the Green River Va ley. The design is an aesthetic contribution to the environment (Introduction, page 1, aVnd Objectives, pages 6 and 8) , which will ". . .enhance the image of the City of Rento . " (Goals, page 4) . Wildlife habitat will be partially enhanced, and a viab e economic climate. . . " will be provided (Goals, page 4) . Suitable landscaping has been provided at the periphery of the site (Objectives, page 6) . Internal circulation accommodates the various means of transportation (Objectives, page 7) . Per Exhibit #3, the loading areas will be visible from adjacent streets but will e obscured by the landscaping along the site perimeter (Objectives, page 8) . 2. The areas of nonconformance of the proposal with the preliminary plat of Orillia Industrial Park are not significant. However, revisions will be required in the final plat which will be the subject of a public hearing thereon, and not this review of a site plan. 3. Detailed landscape plans are required to enable staff to complete final review of their ad uacy. It seems appropriate that the recommended pedestrian pathway not be requi d until the final plat is approved. This feature should be reviewed with the final plat relative to the plat's overall pedestrian system. However, the applican is not prevented from installing the path on a voluntary basis. 4. Due to t e coordinated effort of the applicant with the Burlington Northern Railroad Company in designing the final plat, it seems appropriate to not at this time require construction of the roadway connection of S.W. 41st Street and S.W. 39th Stre t. It is sufficient that the applicant covenant for completion of this roadway s ould it be required in the approved final plat. 5. Due to th potential impact of rooftop mechanical equipment, the Planning Department should re iew these details for compliance with the Objectives, page 8, Comprehensive Plan for he Green River Valley. Impact upon adjacent and distance properties should be minimized. Details of this equipment were not submitted. 6. Screening for the refuse dumpsters was not specified. The final landscape plan should in lude such screening for the review and approval of the Planning Department. DECISION: Based upon th- record, testimony, findings and conclusions, it is the Examiner's decision to approve th- site plan (Exhibit #2) subject to: 1. Completio by the Jack Benaroya Company of improvements required in the approved prelimina y plat of Orillia Industrial Park and improvements required by the approved inal plat thereof, except for improvements which would interfere with and be in onsistent with this approved site plan. 2. Completio of restrictive covenants attesting to construction of the roadway connectio between S.W. 41st Street and S.W. 39th Street should it be required per the a•proved final plat. 3. Submittal of the final storm drainage plans for approval by the Public Works Department. 4. Final approval of the Public Works Department of the proposed railroad spur track locations. 5. Submittal of a final landscape and parking plan per staff comments on Exhibit #4, except fo' the pedestrian pathway along the westerly portion of the property, which sha 1 be resolved in the final plat. However, on a voluntary basis the applicant may include this pathway. The landscape plan shall include screening for the r-fuse dumpsters. 6. Submittal of the rooftop mechanical equipment and screening details for approval by the Pl.nning Department. 7. Submittal of off-site improvement details including landscaping for approval by the Publi Works and Planning Departments. Occupancy of the buildings is not to occur unt' 1 these off-site improvements are completed by the applicant or an LID. 8. Complianc- with all applicable requirements of ordinances of the City of Renton. 9. Approval .f the Flood Zone Control Permit by the King County Division of Hydraulics. 1 SA-216-78 Page Five ORDERED THIS 9th day of November 1978. ck Beeler Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 9th day of November, 1978 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party of record: Joel Benoliel, Jack Benaroya Co. , 5950 6th Avenue S. , Seattle, WA 98108 TRANSMITTED THIS 9th day of November, 1978 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Councilwoman Patricia Seymour-Thorpe Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before November 23, 1978. Any aggrieved person f ling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of 1 or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be asonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set fortlh the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review Of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3015, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said office. I RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER NOV 71978AM PMPLANNINGDEPARTMENT718r9r10,11r12111213141566 PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 7 , 1978 APPLICANT : JACK BENAROYA CO.EXHIBIT NO, / FILE NUMBER: SA-216-78 ITEM NO. A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests the approval of a warehouse facility consisting of four buildings with storage area of 302 , 700 square feet. B. GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : JACK BENAROYA CO . 2 . Applicant : JACK BENAROYA CO . 3. Location :North side of S . W. 41st Street between Longacres Parkway and Lind Avenue extended . 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of Property : 14. 6 acres . 6 . Access : Via S . W. 41st Street . 7 . Existing Zoning : M-P , Manufacturing Park. 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : M-P , Manufacturing Park. 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Manufacturing Park. 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance. C . PURPOSE OF REQUEST: To allow development of a proposed warehouse facility per the existing M-P , Manufacturing Park zone . D . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #1745 dated April 14 , 1959 and amended by Ordinance #1764 of May 27 , 1959 and Ordinance #1928 of December 22 , 1961 . E . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography : The site is relatively level . 2. Soils : Woodinville , slopes 0-2% (Wo ) . Permeability is moderately slow. Runoff is slow and the hazard of erosion is slight. The soil is used for row crops , pasture , and urban development. It has been filled , however , prior to development. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : JACK BENAROYA CO. , FILE NO : SA-216-78 NOVEMBER 7 , 1978 PAGE TWO 3. Vegetation : The site consists of scrub grass and shrubs revegetated over fill . 4. Wildlife: Vegetation on the site may provide habitat for some small wildlife. 5 . Water: No surface water was evidenced on the subject site. 6. Land Use : The site is presently undeveloped . On the south side of S . W. 41st Street are located the initial three ware- house buildings of the phased Benaroya development. F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The general area is experiencing a transition from undeveloped land to commercial and industrial uses . G. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : A 12" water main was recently installed on S . W. 41st Street and 10" stubs routed northward to the subject property . An 8" sewer main has been installed on Longacres Parkway adjacent to the western boundary of the site . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per Ordinance requirements . 3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route #155 operates along S . W. 43rd Street within 1 /2 mile to the south of the subject site. 4. Schools : Not applicable. 5 . Parks : Not applicable. H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-730 ; M-P , Manufacturing Park. 2 . Chapter 22 , Parking and Loading Ordinance. I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT : 1 . Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan , June 1976. 2. Soil Conservation Service/City of Renton Joint Agreement Res . 1923 ) . J . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL SYSTEMS : Development on the subject site will distrub soil and vegetation , increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area. However , these can be mitigated through proper development controls and procedures . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS : Increased social interaction will result from construction and operation of the proposed facility as well as from the increased employment and population in the area . L . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal . This declaration is based on the provision of suitable landscaping and other development controls to reduce the visual impacts of masses of building and parking and provide certainhabitatforwildlife. F PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : JACK BENAROYA CO . , FILE NO : SA-216-78 NOVEMBER 7 , 1978 PAGE THREE M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : A vicinity map and a site map are attached. N . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division. 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division. 5 . City of Renton Fire Department . 0. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The subject proposal consists of four warehouse buildings ranging in size from 39 ,600 to 100 , 200 square feet for a total of 284 ,000 square feet on 14. 6± acres . Such use is consistent with the M-P , Manufacturing Park District. 2. Each building meets or exceeds the minimum 60 ' building setback from a street property line. A minimum 10 ' landscaped strip is provided between the street property line and on-site parking areas . Approximately 5% of the total parking area and 2% of the total site are landscaped in accordinance with applicable ordinances and Res . 1923. The site is required to have approximately 29 ,000 square feet of on-site landscaping exclusive of the parking/street landscaping setback . The site appears to be short by 2 ,000 square feet which can be acheived by minor adjustments . 3. The applicant ' s schematic landscaping plan generally meets the ordinance and Res . 1923 requirements . The applicant ' s proposal to landscape Springbrook Creek conforms to the intent of Res . 1923 to maintain adequate open space areas for wildlife habitat. 4. The subject development is bounded by Lind Avenue which is being improved by an LID and S . W. 41st Street and Longacres Parkway both of which are currently being improved by the developer as a portion of the Phase I development between S . W. " 41st and 43rd Streets . The minor street connection shown on the preliminary plan for this area between S . W. 39th ( future) and S . W. 41st is not proposed for development with this project . The developer and Burlington Northern are continuing to discuss future circulation needs and the potential to delete this connection. However , the area necessary is provided between buildings 5 and 6 for future improvement of this street. The applicant proposes to covenant for future improvement , if required . 5 . Parking is provided on basis of 5% of total area of the buildings to be used for office purposes . ( 1 space per 200 square feet. ) The remaining area to be based upon warehousing ( 1 space per 1 , 500 square feet. ) A total of 251 spaces is required , with 253 being provided , plus 31 spaces in the area of the future right-of-way of the 39th to 41st Street connection. 6 . The applicant has agreed to provide driveways in accordance with the latest revisions to the Parking and Loading Ordinance recommended by the Board of Public Works . The driveways are generally on 160 ' centers and 40 ' driveway width . 7 . The proposed railroad spur tracks will require location and crossing construction approval by the Public Works Department. 8. Refuse dumpster areas should be visually screened and located so as not to conflict other use areas . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : JACK BENAROYA CO. , FILE NO : SA-216-78 NOVEMBER 7 , 1978 PAGE FOUR 9 . See attached Fire Department and Utilities Division comments regarding Fire protection , utilities plan details ,and utilities charges . 10 . A drainage plan has been submitted to the Public WorksDepartment . Approval should be subject to Public WorksDepartmentfinalapprovalofsuchplans . 11 . Signing and building exterior treatment should be carefullycoordinatedanddesignedtobeconsistentwiththeM-P zoneandaestheticanddesignobjectivesoftheComprehensivePlan. P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of proposed site plan subject to : 1 . Final approval of the site plan shall provide additionallandscapedareastoprovideacontrastwiththebuildingfacadetotheapprovalofthePlanningDepartment. 2 . Planning Department and Public Works Department approval of necessary construction methods within proposed rights-of-waywherenecessarybecauseoftheSpringbrookCreeklocation . 3 . Planning Department approval of detailed landscape plansfortheentiresitedevelopmentandoff-site improvementlandscapingwhichwillbeofsufficientsizeandquantitytoreducevisualimpactsoftheproposeddevelopmentand also provide for wildlife food and/or habitat. 4. Driveways to be provided in accordnance with the proposedamendmentstotheParkingandLoadingOrdinance . 5. Planning Department and Public Works Department approval ofoff-site improvements including the location of bike and pedestrian paths and landscaped areas , and right-of-way. 6. Public Works Department approval of railroad spur tracklocationsandstreetcrossings . 7 . Planning Department approval of refuse dumpster locations andlandscape/screening methods . 8. Public Works Department approval of drainage plans . 9 . Fire Department approval of fire protection methods (see attached Fire Department comments ) . 10 . Utilities Division approval of utilities plans and charges . 11 . Planning Department approval of signing and exteriorbuildingtreatmentanddesign . F ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : Finance Department Fire Department Library Department OPark Department OPolice Department 0 Publ,iiiv Works Department Aze--0 Building Div. Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description ) Traffic Engineering Div . lliUtilities Engineering Div . FROM : - Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his dji/()nee ) afittai‘3 DATE : /61 g PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : REZONE MAJOR PLAT VKeSITEAPPROVAL 2./G' - 6 SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE Ri li/ 1(2 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : L Approved Not Approved Comments or conditions : Z.e -/ c'i ( //4i-1,. ._2)--/ ---), Signature o rector or Authorized Representative Date t. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : f//;'( E3' Approved CM. Not Approved Comments or conditions : c /J-70.47 /lira-, /IX-,r9 i•1;.r9,<'',t,7- -.9c /:".Sa -r,,c`/J Ai y G -4 Z' - =4./G''.c.,c` -A-:/4—c." ijx./.) r/K'L- L/// / /(6,(-.'1 . i'A-"/ _ .S7ii/t r)/''i/ 1./i. ji/G` /.lL:i T CC;.c.•ai'.-C22&.L $ /Y'G'Gui,re r oxi i.'S c-G'G'. f'l 27 . Alc;.S 7 /`16 e 7 Gf'•/:"-('. /CW,t(/it'GLi'!'`.C.:c /,c_' .i/.S %w--e; oey,f, 1ti.6/. //l-L / '/.c"e- /9!!'T iCe 42,-(//cG'/-7a -.s SiV/74L /re - ft--/;'.c'c /sC.a ' S OClc./'J ` D- // C 1 i4 Signature 'of Director or , Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : fE] Approved `I Not Approved Comments or conditions : i) Q oL A a s e_:. e f I c_ J Q lcJfltL.Y,hot S S C,J G// e( 46e Ge",-'' /r /;l j 3 Jam,, cI fat Signature of Director or Authorized Representative D'ate I 7/5 S/t ti;,&:e/% /'d,, SL4, REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : UTILITtt=S Approved p Not Approved Comments or conditions : CONT/at 1/4.3Ttt_.tTt('ss pop,. 11 C=vtZr,ATIou ohl 0I1v1_LoP.i-,6 LTO t-ntGthtt t_t?,j. l7RA.u,1v4S 5?.a.)catZ. Garr ,-4TIONS n4AT ARt_ 12l_cz0. To S1-5 (_S Ti= . STY.), uTtLiTI(?S c'"-S or l /G7' o(' SST(,'_ • PtZtoiz Tb coi•.srltocnoN Ttt_1T•tI ' t't•AKS (2rcat) wit ro coKST. eCD e r• Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : p Approved t] Not Approved Comments or conditions : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : C Approved Q Not Approved Comments or conditions : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date F ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : ( 1!l) Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department 0 Public Works Department,k .- Gvd.0 Ili Building Div. 0 Engineering Div. 0 Traffic Engineering Div. 5 Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designeeIblo (24 04004 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- V Application No . : 9,/6 ~ 6 Action Name : &410 14 i 4/ ti,/ 4y40 ' aid o / Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) : /YVA;/ Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : e LD Li Approved Not Approved Comments : l.LC1 Signature of Director Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :Clf Er Approved Not Approved Comments : 14,4-7292' M/1/.c/S /t // ///r.J.P_/7ti7S 4S ieC=Vur2-!3 By 4."772-e Z /.vt-r6 ...t, 4itJ `bee, C//,/'. //ate/ZUic/}-L s';%14--/4/n/-• L-' " /%PZ.- /'>G4;""' Co.c--,,....oC7ie,s 2 )-1,i/,(7c- °/V /J L/6:. "/1--/ . tizis-7 ,-ii 7 G/./:C , (-4jGt/,G--Ac".- 7S / ' ii//J c i/t 2' C,/7/a,cic< /9L c / 4 sz`p i "e2Caz ee:/1-iex.,7- ' (9/r,c Mc. zAe,-/ec s3G%G. /5 PC o)- Q- G/ /7s Signature -f Director or Aut rized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 21 Approved 4,2jNot App %. ved Comments : oz 3/ 7 Signature of Director or AuthorizedRepresentative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : UT(Lt rtr s Approved fJ Not Approved Comments : OLTI/-1ATI? S Ta l7tV%// t-tz.er lu itt2k_ Abulr oa.S Tp 1-4tz h4T1N(. , WAT('I12 SCILAJO SYS-rat- S 4.5/Z• • /0-Z7-7g Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 0 Approved Mot Approved Comments: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Li Approved 1 1Not Approved Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date Ilrtnhpr 31 1 Q 7$ TO: Planning Dept . FROM: Design Eng. SUBJECT: Benaroya Phase 2 The site plan submitted does not include a road connection from SW 41st to Sw 39th as it appears on the approved pre- liminary plat . The route was to be used for water and sanitary sewers for the area just to the north of the Benaroya site as well as provide a loop for the water system. We suggest that provisions be made for these utilities through this site either by easements or that a road con- nection be required. RH: dm O' nrrriNs CT 31 v/4, D EP A5c/ P tOPOSI LD/FINAL OF SIGNIFICANC.F/NU ICNIFICANCE Application No . SA-216-78 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . 381 -78 X FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Site plan approval for warehouse facility in an M-p Manufacturing Park zone. Proponent Jack Benaroya Company Location of Proposal North side of S . W. 41st Street between Longacres Parkway and Lind Avenue S. W. Lead Agency City of Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to have 0 not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS El is Ell is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma-de after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental/significance : This declaration is based upon provision of suitable landscaping to buffer and reduce potential impact of large structures and pavement areas per approval of the Planning Department together with provision of suitable drainage plans and traffic control measures per Public Works Department approval . Measures , if any, that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen Title Plannin DiJ-ctor Date October 30, 1978 Signature City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 e . M P T.G h..... 1,. i 2 1 __ ,a lroa r _._ it I I III I — -'— ---. -- i ir: j I Z r - 11 10Y 5W T Q I-t-1 TT a.-r_+_a—.-•. —-- --— e a i, xo'.xi 25i L41 xs'z• x-I I1 ze 21 i 30.3 Mi 1 TII 1 I --T '-1r'11- 1 r firi; 1 t, H ..1 i _ i 2 1 4a aois. ss's. ssf s.lazlsels+ •i„ I: .e s z., I Ili 1 v h f'sx J jl_ _ 1 , li rP' I_. .-11L_L-_._. J_._.I T I s/'xwQ I VsEcr 1 ez n 90 A re 771 7, I I, 14 'a j :z i 73 .O tLi I f11 1 1 k-H-I i 1 1 , I / G E. ter- —• -- — — r-._._._._._.a. f._._._._.f. 7 — JACK BENAROYA COMPANY , SITE APPROVAL , FILE SA-216-78 APPLICANT JACK BENAROYA COMPANY TOTAL AREA ±14 . 6 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via S . W . 41st Street EXISTING ZONING M-P , Manufacturing Park EXISTING USE Undeveloped PROPOSED USE Construction of Warehouse Facility COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park COMMENTS I .,rr A. ]kKCA uR -la-- F - tc4. A[u P• Woad rig see rloTe 1 li ------ t^of-Y•S•, 7!:K r : 13"e'f- '+•T 'ti'.•+4FiN4++s rr in1f •s'`- a : 7 . 11 1 4 au r Q17 1 I I i a r+ j 40 kJ Ad-7 1-- 7131 yam a. it, us z W h ta M : - Vie 3 s/ a•w Qof .-. .V r _._ s..i... ,'.t A, i . `••r _ • s r.. 1 1 STREET Z L..'1 Lt j 1-- Z Lj Li .s.d.1/ J 14 11 exlstingi • 1 ING 1 L ll existing:1 WIDING 2 4IIexisting'8 1 DING 3 t 4GD1. • 11 -= APP zoX • 120 ' 1 SITE PLAN TOTAL LAND At•:A: 1414. OGtL.5 AppCGX. Ter,'"... CUL.....d Air SA:t. WE 4' -- - - —__ - • c-_—- iti.tATe I.J.•c.>P:'ae: 3 crri a atsi:A -DI ADO-:a.A er.1, I —J i I J L__J L_—J L f(7 1.----- . E---- Lig r - l -- Pr_!c`t rx cc '!cmc_-re 7 FT i NCL. 7p1z Lw t 6Eb.e< I,r'A ICI.+ jEt'SOGK:A.r Ao•1.Q: i.lL^G t A?7 . le; .fn(.Q:,fa:.1/TdA•-t+`1J A;'GG W`Dxt,o..0: 'v.SCL'Js xi.T I.TicTC: :.a c,pr• ARIA ir.:G,..4'iL,:..O2 iafc•1/ BLDa• A•. r a.,. 1;::=:.:II 7; z:—- - 1 ri.----1L-----1 1 I F.-7_77-kt , i i Q--T_ VIZ"aims I i BLDG•5 i min ataa 111111.1 tsar a 1•15111d1 s.Uu 1 1OM BLDG•6 A, /I(o !t Oa&Milk i. T 1 1I r.__ I. i C t L------I 6 -- ' (, t; L , -t i 1. 1--3 l_ i t I I I .Ire.... 11 IjI I I I e MEMORANDUM From the desk of CHIEF GEISSLER No'ember 3, 1978 RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON EXHIBIT NOMr. Rick Beeler HEARING EXAMINER Public Hearing Examiner AM O\ti' a 1978 ITEM NO. 5,q _,,,v/z _77 Re: Benaroya, Phase II 71801101111I2111P;3i415,6 Sir: o S.W. 39th St . that extends off of Lind Ave. S.W. , forms a 1500 foot cul-de-sac. This situation would create a problem for access by emergency vehicles. It is my recommendation that this dul-de-sac be connected to S.W. 41st which would eliminate a potentially hazardous situation. Sincerely, RECEIVED Richard Geissler CITY OF RENTON Fire Chief HEARING EXAMINER RG/ap NN io 3 1978 AM PM 718,91101111121112i31415,6 4 6_ d) Sewer or septic tanks? X YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage? X YES RAYBE f) Solid waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (c) New water line being installed as part of (Lind Avenue) L.I .D. #302. This will contribute to effectiveness of fire protection automatic sprinkler system. 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X YES MAYBE NE Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public , or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an ateration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? YES MAYBE N Explanation: III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: 4 signe 1.Ana t A• of I I name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 1( 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand X for new parking? YES MAYBE NO c ) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X VET— MAYBE NU— d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or Xmovementofpeopleand/or goods? YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X YES FAVITE NO Explanation: (a) & (b) Approximately 250 employees are anticipated, but they will be adequately served by parking areas provided. 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? X YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? X YES MAYBE NO c) Schools?X YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in : X a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X YES MAYBE N(- Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? X YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? X YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement Xoffauna? YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 7) Light_ and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X YFS MAYBE N6- Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the Xpresentorplannedlanduseofanarea? YES MAYBE NO ' Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X YES RTME NO Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X YES MATBE NO- Explanation: 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X YES MAYBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? X YES MAYBE NO c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or X regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? X YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES MAYBE W f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of X ground waters? YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, X or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? YES RAMIE NO Explanation: (b) Due to construction of buildings and asphalt parking and loading areas; (d) (e) will be limited as required by detention/retention of storm water per City Ordinance. 4)c_ Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs, grass, crops , microflora and aquatic plants.)? X Yn5 MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? X YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area , or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X YES M YBE Nb d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (c) New plant species to be introduced in landscaped areas. 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : Project is located within a ma nufacturing_.ark zone and is in agreement with zoning code and Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Surrounding area is being pre- pared for M-P development and has had stabilizing fill placed on site and surroundings. Site is on north side of S.W. 41st between Lind and Longacres Parkway. 8. Estirated date for completion of the proposal : May, 1979 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : Building permits (4) , State Flood Control Zone Permits (4) , and Site Review. 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: This proposal constitutes the second and final phase of development. The first phase, Buildings #1 , 2 & 3, and construction of Longacres and S.W. 41st Streets will have been completed. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain: No 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Application for Site Review is being submitted herewith. II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? X YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X YES MAYBE NO d) The destruction , covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X YYE — MAYBE NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , Xeitheronoroffthesite? YES MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the X bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MAYBE Explanation: b) Building areas will receive fill to bring to required elevation. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM OR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. 51 42`70---.-- ----..__..__ Environmental Checklist No. .EeF- ,387-25, PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date : 1Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance 0 Declaration of Non-Significance [] Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required , or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved withtyour proposal to undertake the required 'environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. Tire following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to y ur proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "co" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM l BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent Jack A. Benaroya Company Address and phone number of Proponent: 5950 Sixth Avenue South S.ea.t_tl e WA 9810$ — - ---—------— -- 762-4750 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist Planning Department 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Benaroya Business Park, Renton (North Phase) 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Buildings for warehousing located on a site consisting of approximately. 14.6 acres. Four buildings (Buildings #4,5,6, & 7) will contain an aggre- gate of approximately 290,000 square feet. Buildings are to be of tilt-up concrete wall construction and may be served by rail . CITY OF RENTON Q/ Rep\ 4/A APPLICATION o SITE APPROVAL 80 1978 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 0 File No. SA- 2.h. 15 Filing PATO 78 Application Fee $ 1 -B, ,) Receipt No. Environmental Review Fee $ 3d . 44 APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1. Name Jack A. Benaroya Company Phone 762-4750 Address_ 5950 Sixth Avenue South, Seattle, WA 98108 2 . Property location North side of S.W. 41st Street between Longacres Parkway and Iind Avenue. (Future) . 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) See lecgal description attached hereto. 4. Number of acres or square feet Approximately 14.6 acrespresent zoning MP 5. What do you propose to develop on this property? Warehousing, Buildings 4, 5, 6, and 7 to complete development of Benaroya Business Park. (Buildings 1 . 2, and 3 veviously approved under separate application. ) 6. The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) . 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels)1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) 7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION : Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks r Planning D4)t. Rev. 1-77 LEGAL DESCRIPTION NORTH PROPERTY BENAROYA BUSINESS PARK, RENTON That portion of the southwest quarter of Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , and of Government Lot 1 , Section 31 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , and of the northeast quarter of Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , and of the southeast quarter of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , all in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Section 30; thence South 89005'08" East along the south line thereof a distance of 867.18 feet to the west line of proposed Lind Avenue as designed under City of Renton Local Improvement District No. 302, and to the true point of beginning; Thence northerly along said west line and along a curve to the right having a radius of 2,040 feet, an arc distance of 25.37 feet through a central angle of 00°42'46" to the south line of the right-of-way of Burlington Northern, Inc. ; Thence North 88°55'13" West along said south line a distance of 976.89 feet to an angle point therein; Thence North 87°31 'Ol " West along said south line a distance of 1144.10 feet to a point which lies 90.13 feet east of the west line of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 25; Thence South 01030'30" West parallel to said west line a distance of 25.17 feet; Thence South 01°47 '51 " West a distance of 235.81 feet; Thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 55.00 feet an arc distance of 86.78 feet through a central angle of 90024'28"; Thence South 88036'37" East a distance of 2,001 .86 feet; Thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 55.00 feet an arc distance of 86.69 feet through a central angle of 90018'38" to a point on the west line of said proposed Lind Avenue; Thence North 01004'45" East along said west line a distance of 22.58 feet; Thence continuing northerly along said west line and along a curve to the right having a radius of 2,040.00 feet an arc distance of 196.95 feet through a central angle of 05031 '53" to the true point of beginning. Except that portion of Springbrook Creek (Drainage District No. 1 ) , located in the westerly portion thereof as described in King County Cause NO. 32912. r AFFIDAVIT 1 , JACK A. BENAROYA COMPANY being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 079 g day of ara- 197r , Notary Public in and for the tate of Washington, residing at K A. BENAROYA COMPANY r0 el AP Name f NitarPu lic) A i r e=xxf=Ozase_ President fib t, ' 2 f. 4 9033 5950 Sixth Avenue South Address) Address) Seattle, WA City) State) 762-4750 Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received 19 By: Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON, ON NOVEMBER 7 1978 , AT 9:00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . JACK A BENAROYA COMPANY , APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL IN M-P ZONE ( PHASE 2 ) , File SA-216-78 ; property located on north side of S . W . 41st Street between Longacres Parkway and Lind Avenue extended . 2 . MICHAEL TURNER , AGENT FOR MR. AND MRS . JOHN BANCHERO AND DR . AND MRS . ROBERT FLORER, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R- 1 TO R-3 , File R-234-78 ; property located on the south- west corner of N . E . 12th Avenue and Edmonds Ave . N . E . 3 . LARRY HOWE , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R-2 TO R-3 , File R-235-78 ; property located on Jefferson Ave . N . E . between N . E . 12th Street and N . E . 16th Street. Legal descriptions of applications noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED :PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 7 , 1978 AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y. ERICKSEN PUBLISHED October 27 , 1978 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , STEVE MUNSON HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public , on the 25th day of October 19 78 . SIGNED m:711110LIP 3140$44400A 1eo \ i', N(_ M OF PA, o THE CITY OF RENTON U 4 ..' 4'Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 0 as. CHARLES J. DELAURENTI ,MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 09 m, 235- 2550 P 4TED SEP1°° Jack A. Benaroya Company 5950 Sixth Avenue South Seattle , Washington 98108 RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR SIZE APPROVAL IN AN MP ZONE , FILE NO : SA- 216-78 ; FOR COMPLETION OF BENAROYA BUSINESS PARK . Dear Sir: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on August 30 , 1978 A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for November 7 , 1978 at 9 : 00 A . M . . Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning ' rector By avid R . Clemens Associate Planner cc : Horton Dennis and Associates 6133 Sixth Avenue South Seattle , Washington 98108 1 OF R4, 0, rirD ° THE CITY OF RENTON z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055moms , °' CHA RLES J. DELAURENTI i MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT9A O9 TEo sE PT 0'6 235- 2550 November 3 , 1978 Robert Fehnel Jack Benaroya Company 595D 6th Avenue South Seattle , Washington 98108 RE : Pedestrian/bicycle trails , OrilliaIndustrialPark Deal. Mr , Fehnel : Pur! uant to your request of November 2 , 1978, concerning whichsideofLongacresParkwaythebicyclepathwaywilloccur, our officehasmadetherecommendationthatitbelocatedontheeastsideoftheroad . In turn , the pedestrian walkway should occur onthewestside . As for S . W. 41st Street , the bicycle trail will be located on thenorthsideandthepedestrianwalkwayonthesouth . The bicycle trails and pedestrian walkways will be 8-feet and6-feet in width respectively . The bicycle trails will be pavedwithasphaltandthepedestrianwalkwayswithconcrete . Theywillalsohaveameanderingconfigurationwithlandscapingontiesides . Its felt that by siting the bicycle trails andpede:; trian walkways in this arrangement , they will better linkwithexistingandotherproposedtrailsystemsinthevicinity. If ycu have any other questions concerning this matter, please feelfreetocontactthisdepartment . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen , Planning Director Jerry Lind , Plannr/Designer GYE : JI : sh cc : Mike Smith INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date frtnhar '1 , 1978 TO: Planning Dept . FROM: Design Eng . SUBJECT: Benaroya Phase 2 The site plan submitted does not include a road connection from SW 41st to Sw 39th as it appears on the approved pre- liminary plat . The route was to be used for water and sanitary sewers for the area just to the north of the Benaroya site as well as provide a loop for the water system. We suggest that provisions be made for these utilities through this site either by easements or that a road con- nection be required. RH : dm Y Ei' H Lti. CT 31 Yiti/A, G DEP Pvi l THE CITY OF RENTON L MUNICIPAL BUILDING 20: MILL AVE SO. RENTON. WASH 98055 o p _ CHARLES J DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER co 4- L. RICK BEELER . 235-259300P440SEPit* November 27, 1978 Mr. Joel Benoliel Jack A. Benaroya Company 5950 6th Avenue South Seattle, WA 98108 RE: File No. SA-216-78; Jack A. Benaroya Company. Dear Mr. Benoliel: This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved subject to restrictive covenants as noted on the Examiner's report of November 9, 1978, has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk this date for permanent filing. Restrictive covenants will be filed by the City Clerk with King County. Sinc- _ fir•._ L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department 01CityClerk2g y o Aso File No. SA-216-78 Jack A. Benaroya Co. DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Jack A. Benaroya Company is the owner of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: See attached legal description - Exhibit "A") WHEREAS, the owner of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desires to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner hereby establishes, grants and imposes restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT Upon request of the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner, a street is to be constructed from S.W. 41st Street to what is to be S.W. 39th Street. Said street shall be required by the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner only in the event said street is required in the final plat of Orillia Industrial Park. Furthermore, said street shall conform to the requirements of the final plat of Orillia Industrial Park and conform with the concept and the location specified in the approved site plan (File No. SA-216-78; Exhibit "B") for development of the bui.dings on the property. Construction of said street shall occur coincidentally with construction of what is to be S.W. 39th Street including that portion of the connector street lying north of the Burlington Northern right-of-way. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire at such time as the aforesaid street has either been completed or certified by the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner as not required pursuant to the final plat of Orillia Industrial Park. La ry R. B naroya, Vice Pr ident Jack A. enaroya Company STNIT OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING r7) On this/7 day of 19 , before me personally appeared Larry R. Benaroya to be k own to be the Vice President of the Jack A. Benaroya Company tha._ executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to d°xecute said instrument for said corporation, and that the seal affixed, if any, is'`_he corporate seal of said corporation. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year firstabove written. r• rs otary Public in and for the S a of Washington, residing in irEXHIBIT "A"LEGAL11 r• NoRT: I.0 I.1 BENAROYA COSINESS PARK, RENTON That portion of the southwest quarter of Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , and of Government Lot 1 , Section 31 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , and of the northeast quarter of Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , and of the southeast quarter of Section 25, Township 23 t;ortn, Range 4 East, W.M. , all in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Section 30; thence South 89005'08" East along the south line thereof a distance of 867.18 feet to the west line of proposed Lind Avenue as designed under City of Renton Local Improvement District No. 302, and to the true point of beginning; Thence northerly along said west line and along a curve to the right having a radius of 2,040 feet, an arc distance of 25.37 feet through a central angle of 00°42'46" to the south line of the right-of-way of Burlington Northern, Inc. ; ThencE North 88°55' 13" West along said south line a distance of 976.8c feet to an angle point therein; Thence N,).•th 87°31 'Ol " West along said south line a distance of 1144 . 10 feet to a point which lies 90. 13 feet east of the west line cf the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Secticn 25; Thence South 01030' 30" West parallel to said west line a distance of 25. 17 feet; Thence South 01°47 ' 51 " West a distance of 235.81 feet; Thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 55.00 feet an arc distance of 86.78 feet through a central angle of 90024'28"; Thence South 88036' 37" East a distance of 2,001 .86 feet; Thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 55.00 feet an arc distance of 86.69 feet through a central angle of 90018'38" to a point on the west line of said proposed Lind Avenue; Thence North 01004'45" East along said west line a distance of 22.58 feet; Thence continuing northerly along said west line and along a curve to the right having a radius of 2,00.00 feet an arc distance of 196.95 feet through a central angle of 05031 '53" to the true point of beginning. Excopt th,it portion of Springbrook Creek (Drainage District No. 1 ) , located in the westerly portion thereof as described in Kirn Cr,unty Cauca NO. 12912_ 7 44 i i 041•11•. Area reserved forIrgargria,,V1X.V. future 60' connectomu.;not.of.....,-- tt ' 9'44,,.-t' --__. . 34.r__ . i'...::.s,--- •eff *; SOO' g!. P ts.tit kl, „1 t 1 r'°' i. J • 7-..„...,.......„... 1, 3 ' 1 r.._- 3 :VP;11 1 . SA00 aa 41:0 100.20041 fc I 3t ha 73.300.el 6i* .•-:. di Is., . . ia 7,. . m.I 41,- 11/! MOO. il) , 2 !I iPi t !--ji ii ../ • ig a 4, f3 tv_ir -t,.4.: PM •'.2.. .': :.. r. :sr?, CL_.0 .r. 1 .1„. ,. 77+-0,, i i A_ -. •PIL, Ilintyl, ' .r•Ett) 6...0...:1 :171j::. t - '"'- ..C.75iret-- -" iv- SW WI"STREET 2 j 3 0 L.1• )4.1J ! 4! 1 I - r._..-, 1 ..1.•• I I I iIiiTl1L... .., estsUngl.*‘12010 I I I M1.°1/ 2 .. • •__-____I editing] 'DING 3 i . I I 0$46.1.C. IC Afflacg• W-0htSITEPLA P41 a.....4 MeV 0,,: i::r •:ZIL ..01ra•-..m rmw:a =jLi -•-• L::VT+-4 L.:-----0 •-•=:-L--11-%.7 :.--,4 = .3--...7- J‘•-LL--4 .- 3 .--_=-:-a 6.....-^,r...vg,1.,.....•: .4,44,o0 4",:••••4,.1.,.4,".......r4 1,4,-.........neeee.........,..e.r...r4 641 = 1 C.-- = L_i ET . C77.: 1:41 E. : L.- V.....,........0. .1...Ccs se...r•le:.....u.,.....G/,,,,,,7.,1..........;..,-..,............-.,,f ..,,,....,-,4,,..,,,,,,,,....... ... 7.....1_,IS.....,,...L.,..“../ a....r.... r.....:...,.....i./C000:0,/ i..... BLDG•4 TOT C...t...../.•.....q. i I Lo. .--..e.wt r".. .mil -1-• (-=-1 --- — .)li' -—.—.t L:= 7. ! 7-= '‘'''' --1 77-- - L---- ----J., 4?-a---K.---Li L.--.; 1.- .1 .-.6-----,4 :,----,t '—..._t BLDG•5 I agr/1 I 1 MLIFS:Velnini MI!"q''."91 ai-dib BLDG 421 Extknir 6 teramecA_ 1 ;7_7_1 k______. ff .1 1 6------t L-4 E------t; J; -__:--.•-.;_lit"-------a L 1 .—.. --rt ..._...o11El=1 I 1 I I = 1 I LIVA Jack A. Benaroya Company 5950 Sixth Avenue South, Seattle, WA 98108 (206)762 4750 00 November 17, 1978 Mr. L. Rick Beeler Land Use Hearing Examiner City of Renton Municipal Building Renton, WA 98055 Re: Declaration of Restrictive Covenants. File No. SA-216-78. I enclose herewith the executed original of the Declaration regarding the connector street between future S.W. 41st and future S.W. 39th. I have attached thereto Exhibit B, a reduced copy of the Site Plan submitted at our hearing. The words "Area reserved for future 60 ' connector street" with an arrow, have been added to designate the location of the connector street as we discussed. I have also taken the liberty of adding the following language to the end of the paragraph entitled Roadway Improvement: including that portion of the connector street lying north of the Burlington Northern right-of-way." I feel this is necessary to accomplish the purpose we discussed, namely to make our obligation contingent on what actually happens in the Burlington Northern property. Thus, should the connector street be required in their final plat, and when their portion of it is constructed, then we are obliged to construct our portion of it. Otherwise, there is no guarantee that our portion would be necessary. Thank you for your attention to this. 64111 ,c rv pcrrYoF NERNYG E, MINER Joel Benol i el4$$'(AM NOV- 01978 Legal Counsel INDUSTRIAL PARKS/WAREHOUSES/OFFICE BUILDINGS/SHOPPING CENTERS AND SPECIALIZED MERCHANDISE MARTS. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King MarilynJ. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 9th day of November 1978 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this - day of c;N)e\e, 19 `I . Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton Application , Petition or Case : Jack Benarova Co. ; SA-216-78 The minutes contain a £ Lot ob .the pate.tLes oti kecokd) t PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 7 , 1978 APPLICANT : JACK BENAROYA CO. FILE NUMBER: SA-216-78 A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests the approval of a warehouse facility consisting of four buildings with storage area of 302 , 700 square feet. B. GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : JACK BENAROYA CO . 2 . Applicant: JACK BENAROYA CO. 3. Location :North side of S . W. 41st Street between Longacres Parkway and Lind Avenue extended . 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of Property : 14. 6 acres . 6 . Access : Via S . W. 41st Street . 7 . Existing Zoning : M-P , Manufacturing Park. 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : M-P , Manufacturing Park. 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Manufacturing Park. 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance. C . PURPOSE OF REQUEST: To allow development of a proposed warehouse facility per the existing M-P , Manufacturing Park zone . D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #1745 dated April 14 , 1959 and amended by Ordinance #1764 of May 27 , 1959 and Ordinance #1928 of December 22 , 1961 . E . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography : The site is relatively level . 2 . Soils : Woodinville , slopes 0-2% (Wo) . Permeability is moderately slow. Runoff is slow and the hazard of erosion is slight. The soil is used for row crops , pasture, and urban development. It has been filled , however , prior to development. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : JACK BENAROYA CO. , FILE NO : SA-216-78 NOVEMBER 7 , 1978 PAGE TWO 3. Vegetation : The site consists of scrub grass and shrubs revegetated over fill . 4. Wildlife : Vegetation on the site may provide habitat for some small wildlife. 5 . Water : No surface water was evidenced on the subject site. 6. Land Use : The site is presently undeveloped . On the south side of S . W. 41st Street are located the initial three ware- house buildings of the phased Benaroya development. F . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The general area is experiencing a transition from undeveloped land to commercial and industrial uses . G . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : A 12" water main was recently installed on S . W. 41st Street and 10" stubs routed northward to the subject property. An 8" sewer main has been installed on Longacres Parkway adjacent to the western boundary of the site . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per Ordinance requirements . 3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route #155 operates along S . W. 43rd Street within 1 /2 mile to the south of the subject site. 4. Schools : Not applicable. 5 . Parks : Not applicable. H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4- 730 ; M-P , Manufacturing Park. 2 . Chapter 22 , Parking and Loading Ordinance. I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT : 1 . Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan , June 1976. 2 . Soil Conservation Service/City of Renton Joint Agreement Res . 1923 ) . J . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL SYSTEMS : Development on the subject site will distrub soil and vegetation , increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area. However , these can be mitigated through proper development controls and procedures . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS : Increased social interaction will result from construction and operation of the proposed facility as well as from the increased employment and population in the area . L . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal . This declaration is based on the provision of suitable landscaping and other development controls to reduce the visual impacts of masses of building and parking and provide certain habitat for wildlife . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : JACK BENAROYA CO. , FILE NO : SA-216-78 NOVEMBER 7 , 1978 PAGE THREE M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : A vicinity map and a site map are attached. N . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division. 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4. City of Renton Utilities Division. 5 . City of Renton Fire Department . 0. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The subject proposal consists of four warehouse buildings ranging in size from 39 ,600 to 100 , 200 square feet for a total of 284 ,000 square feet on 14. 6± acres . Such use is consistent with the M-P , Manufacturing Park District . 2. Each building meets or exceeds the minimum 60 ' building setback from a street property line. A minimum 10 ' landscaped strip is provided between the street property line and on-site parking areas . Approximately 5% of the total parking area and 2% of the total site are landscaped in accordinance with applicable ordinances and Res . 1923. The site is required to have approximately 29 ,000 square feet of on-site landscaping exclusive of the parking/street landscaping setback . The site appears to be short by 2 ,000 square feet which can be acheived by minor adjustments . 3. The applicant ' s schematic landscaping plan generally meets the ordinance and Res . 1923 requirements . The applicant ' s proposal to landscape Springbrook Creek conforms to the intent of Res . 1923 to maintain adequate open space areas for wildlife habitat. 4. The subject development is bounded by Lind Avenue which is being improved by an LID and S . W. 41st Street and Longacres Parkway both of which are currently being improved by the developer as a portion of the Phase I development between S . W. 41st and 43rd Streets . The minor street connection shown on the preliminary plan for this area between S . W. 39th (future ) and S . W. 41st is not proposed for development with this project . The developer and Burlington Northern are continuing to discuss future circulation needs and the potential to delete this connection . However , the area necessary is provided between buildings 5 and 6 for future improvement of this street. The applicant proposes to covenant for future improvement, if required . 5 . Parking is provided on basis of 5% of total area of the buildings to be used for office purposes . ( 1 space per 200 square feet. ) The remaining area to be based upon warehousing ( 1 space per 1 , 500 square feet. ) A total of 251 spaces is required , with 253 being provided , plus 31 spaces in the area of the future right-of-way of the 39th to 41st Street connection. 6 . The applicant has agreed to provide driveways in accordance with the latest revisions to the Parking and Loading Ordinance recommended by the Board of Public Works . The driveways are generally on 160 ' centers and 40 ' driveway width . 7 . The proposed railroad spur tracks will require location and crossing construction approval by the Public Works Department. 8. Refuse dumpster areas should be visually screened and located so as not to conflict other use areas . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : JACK BENAROYA CO. , FILE NO : SA-216-78 NOVEMBER 7 , 1978 PAGE FOUR 9 . See attached Fire Department and Utilities Division comments regarding Fire protection , utilities plan details ,and utilities charges . 10. A drainage plan has been submitted to the Public Works Department. Approval should be subject to Public Works Department final approval of such plans . 11 . Signing and building exterior treatment should be carefullycoordinatedanddesignedtobeconsistentwiththeM-P zoneandaestheticanddesignobjectivesoftheComprehensivePlan . P . PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of proposed site plan subject to: 1 . Final approval of the site plan shall provide additionallandscapedareastoprovideacontrastwiththebuildingfacadetotheapprovalofthePlanningDepartment. 2. Planning Department and Public Works Department approval of necessary construction methods within proposed rights-of-waywherenecessarybecauseoftheSpringbrookCreeklocation . 3 . Planning Department approval of detailed landscape plansfortheentiresitedevelopmentandoff-site improvement landscaping which will be of sufficient size and quantitytoreducevisualimpactsoftheproposeddevelopmentand also provide for wildlife food and/or habitat. 4. Driveways to be provided in accordnance with the proposedamendmentstotheParkingandLoadingOrdinance . 5 . Planning Department and Public Works Department approval ofoff-site improvements including the location of bike and pedestrian paths and landscaped areas , and right-of-way. 6 . Public Works Department approval of railroad spur tracklocationsandstreetcrossings . 7 . Planning Department approval of refuse dumpster locations andlandscape/screening methods . 8 . Public Works Department approval of drainage plans . 9 . Fire Department approval of fire protection methods (see attached Fire Department comments ) . 10 . Utilities Division approval of utilities plans and charges . 11 . Planning Department approval of signing and exteriorbuildingtreatmentanddesign . ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : Finance Department Fire Department Library Department OPark Department OPolice Department l" Publ,i Works Department AZe-ie--° Building Div . Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description) Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM : ' Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his d i n a e ) cl okio e o( [ J'5 DATE : 16/f/2 0 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : REZONE MAJOR PLAT VKSITE APPROVAL Lib 6 SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT q WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE U e//7, i REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :4:1±__:' F_ DL, agqj ApprovedNot Approved Comments or conditions : ce'> ( /7/1 w 1'--1 —Id) Signature o rector or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : its'< J O- Approved Q Not Approved Comments or conditions : 4 i:' /"/i4,, 44...,,9 /•1;%4, 44.-<"j Ail- /'6G`t..—/m`'J A //Z L 67:4-76-/ -et: i4,6- /1-t-4-7 et- G/a/G/ - NO'''" 'N/L .S'i',v -)411"' l/i.1 j'x— z'E'7 Lsr CZ' )t-- /'CGi,/.t-Cr7) pv ,,?t./- 1 ^• Gl . Alt r.f ; /"'C % Gs•A-C. /C U//tcN 4.....:S /Zip' :i//( i%/=2: 0c'Ct// 4it-L/.47/I/L /-//CC /2U% 4,-, /('2, -S 5,//?L L ,', /`16'% /.(6-% -.c'4- /;(.4 • S OCl t/ .''- C,G,t—,——7:--'t l /e• /-7,' Signature 'of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ter Z] Approved `J Not Approved Comments or conditions : e C71i1,_7• 1-.1 L Lvrtee Oc CSr...l y/ S f hA/c( 4.e 6,n,..-.;--/r 1 4 ,gyp C 0 I nG,... . 7 Signature of Director or Authorized ,Representative Date Suui/rnr/it./ J* th/5 Si t P c, JUST r2r0r (i,. rar'.r r ' //ic" ,,, •i; .:e REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : UTILITt S Approved 5 Not Approved Comments or conditions : CONT/ac.t taTtt_ITIr15 I-NGtg-+r"c.rZm is FoR 114.of P-i, TtoH OM 01:v1_wp.i,6 LTI3 (_NGrMt13l_t?trvC. 02Awarv4.5 f=012 "JATt.tZ L se,,J4'_1?_ C7-TC=1rT1oh- n4h.T A1Zt_ (ZI.QO, To Si"_"r2vl= T6411. StTG . STYJ,, OTtt_ITto Cty `S 01= lct-/p' or. S,Tr • PI2tolt ro srtuLr,"H ti Tit-Iru i -Ar- s I2.I:Q0 PrttvK ro coa.sr. h, Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : E=D Approved 1=1Not Approved Comments or conditions : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : C Approved Q Not Approved Comments or conditions : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: ( Ii*:1) Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department 0 Public Works Department}'.-e.,/ eve. 0 Building Div. 1 Engineering Div. 0 Traffic Engineering Div. 5 Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his designee rtt: ay SUBJECT: Review of ECF- V .- 101/41/06:, , Application No. : 06, '- 6g Action Name : d / f 112 ,2 1 61I//J 4 a1d 6;d Please review the attached. Review requested by (date ) : /e 2 Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW •BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : gL.D ‘. E. Approved J Not Approved Comments : LCt L`G0 Signature of Director authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :XeF Er Approved Q Not Approved Comments : v/?7 M/fih.CS / tD ///rJ,e/f v 73 /}S ieClu//e-c'7 Sy 97c' G c ,,t i6t &K 0 `/.P? C1/,cV-:_ i/0/e/Zpti/'3-L S f7P.4-4 / //' L-i T-/ `i.Pe-- /96'277" Co%(-.. c7,..,L.s w,, -,o 'Ai /L . 'i i . /"/-i S 7 fr1f 7 U`C ,c-' //ie''f'lc "Y f'-t' 7ii/i.' c` a c,-/r ,e-1c /9 G !W /'L`p i "e2 04.,/,Lr,—IG,v7S• cr,!/?!L ' ' ' " /. F-e,/L'6c G/--. /5 oc k1 O 7 Signature F.T. Director or Aut rized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : A `CoApproved Plot ved mments : oz 3/ 7 Signature of Director or Authoriz Representative i Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : T( L t —t s g Approved J Not Approved Comments : ULTlf'- ATr? S 04 v/cL Pr_ NHN lU t_` t2f2gott.zo Aougpoi-.S To 1" tZ 134T1 N G. • +AT(-z. 4.Sf'wa_rt. Sy STat-t 115 0-Z7-7g Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Approved riNot Approved Comments: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ti Approved 11 Not Approved Comments :p Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date nrtnhPr 'K1 , 1 Q 78 To: Planning Dept . FROM: Design Eng. SUBJECT: Benaroya Phase 2 The site plan submitted does not include a road connection from SW 41st to Sw 39th as it appears on the approved pre- liminary plat . The route was to be used for water and sanitary sewers for the area just to the north of the Benaroya site as well as provide a loop for the water system. We suggest that provisions be made for these utilities through this site either by easements or that a road con- nection be required. RI-I : dm G pF re-F, ncrFli;r "%v CT 31 G DEPP PROPOSED/FINA FECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANC 1ON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No. SA-216-78 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . 381 -78 0 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Site plan approval for warehouse facility in an M-p Manufacturing Park zone. Proponent Jack Benaroya Company Location of Proposal North side of S . W. 41st Street between Longacres Parkway and Lind Avenue S .W. Lead Agency City of Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to have x not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS ispisnotrequiredunderRCW43 . 21C . O3O (2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental/significance : This declaration is based upon provision of suitable landscaping to buffer and reduce potential impact of large structures and pavement areas per approval of the Planning Department together with provision of suitable drainage plans and traffic control measures per Public Works Department approval . Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final )declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen Title Planning Di/ctor Date October 30, 1978 Signature Ayr r de City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 MP L...G ._.. ... _. . G 1 III' r._ I I— i 4 .-T- --r211 ---1 -- '•1-1 1 1— i I -T 7 1 T--t rT r T 1 7 3 i 1is r yi aai+M._. ...... ..J --- --_ _ _ b E , LO iti. ; n•t)I L.i t31 2.1 i 20 29130 3.I I I 1_ I 1.. I La -L,_ rozza T- -r---_- 1 Q i I 1 i)rI I l I.1.5 ... 1. 3 4L; a_140.39 307. i , TI IF n L. Z IIIYHSIMII FO N SO A' 1, ^ 3'D. )s l5 l61 sr;S! 3 .' v, P .{ .. I1 - T7 T_-' , ,_, Tj TT. it l UB f II I BO I ' r3 r. n I rr I I« IIfs a i• i i- — Lam .4i k \ 1ii H i I G gUaVii 1-19 L- i fzi i 1 P 11 i JACK BENAROYA COMPANY , SITE APPROVAL , FILE SA-216-78 APPLICANT JACK BENAROYA COMPANY TOTAL AREA ±14 . 6 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via S . W . 41st Street EXISTING ZONING M-P , Manufacturing Park EXISTING USE Undeveloped PROPOSED USE Construction of Warehouse Facility COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park COMMENTS 4 0v6 . Acr..•• Allikr.erA_T_To ligidillariyeli se r.loT Arallsosidright-of-way -t I , pi! ts-411-•-•••••••t t"A0,<Alr." 44•01,41,4,JAN.L.,%. ask...S.WAVIIIMMAIIIMMtgamipm..... s 1. --•,,•..,:-4t!...1,...??oritop........,,,„„„„,,, -. ii el-- . "Alir ""-t-4•T"- --ft-c---.- ,-'„1:..---..-.,... --..--,::•-•,-., . . e t.,.."7,,,x•tio, 4,itt.si.a...A• 11,4*. lyittgree-SMS44*-44".4°AiSteengki -,E..4:00.W.U.S...t'..b.•,•.-ez.z.......,... • _.-t•-,-:' - .'•-'I'-'1'1•.00^-.1',&14N..r.-g-"'"'+'0''=1,,, .r.,-et,P 4-41.5 GOO' tr,,, leo' 42V 36.06 . r..--7.-4'.....4•- - 40. it i r_. •• - 1 Cm. I) 1 17., I it . 7 LII 4 zir• I • .1.•... 5 270' . ......___ C._D 7 I 4 iII14 . 611,400 as 76.200sa silm 1 I 40 - g 100,200 as i x 6 I5 ,• , ...,Lir) F-- m 9,I5tX)as tnit......,____a_......."4,1 , ill Y ' sa ' 3 ; i 04-: i • 1...ri 1 2 • 1 1 ,lby it te-PT:i ii ad . 1, ''.• 1 d v.:::?........"..a•---%e.....43 Cl.:".` — Acticr-cae:":0 InCer""•••••:" If elk . Itir k We'At... P .• 1 1 ;.‘, •=es 1: 1 t - ji T: -- '4'. : 6 3. . -t'i A' II t r.• t -.4.=61.11.1111 as.lit CO 1% _ =maw, • e •A. 1., • e..i.o. g TrAt, .elk .1t,,, . c, .7 __._ 11),. ,J i 4--,.,..:.7.,. 7.awl .,- Flr,:h_. ..-_ ; A.R.1 At r 1.*./ i 4 x . .• , ,..4;4,1 - ;'..." .:**,.s LA: -. tt;14%0.c.,....,_•-• ,...,..... 83A/. 41sT STREET 24,i LI i _1-_ _ 1 f.--..- ale2 - / 1-------1-- •' •' .__r--—----711: L i_ 1 •i L_--z 1 li I i ! 7-._--------1.......—___...........—.1 Iisung • UM° 1 1 P mtisting, MMHG 2 1 existing 0 liDING 3P _ 1 i i ii_ I rkt SITEIIArPm< .PLAN1 ° 1.1.a• qa-e-sp& i Tams.. 1.•••••2 AarA: aka, AGMS AppeoX. rank* IsAl—siss AA:44 • ".•• ft,PK _ IPAIMION44 Per..41.1.11WO: V• Glide srAi.i...0%,:elantsi my: e : cs, GAIC ISIAL.60, ••9 i A00•.:01...4‘. oliewOOXIMATC 1.0.6.27,41PIV.'",AMU: to,asca c:;:AT(a4A-1.- dile...A-eV-a:1K cer.r.‹. L---- - ,...... -ma- •----:-.-.Z.- li..:.4.-7-- --11: L------------II LT=----li 77:...-;—AT.:1 .:77,.- c•-:,----.----.1 .r._-:-L. ---A - . 3 .---•.-4 sm....-.,.,....-.... .:.-memvr..--rt o.e,..,.......,-,...2(:......,...,..,,...!: .4.,,,........, • 16,:: i.,„,,......:;/-ra,_---.. N L _111___J LJ [ _1 F—ii 1.7--.____ I 1-7 ; [----7 14g E rlacleasiq Al....a.i.A4P•dc.aol-dq:1.ivIrt•..a...:•se.acar AMA 0.40.... ift.4,52:6&A2 FlAtic,..-::;..."s*ma--r---1/0..*Z5 Ae•.>t: ssw...1/4"sym.p.1 proper‘,/4 1:3eBLDG• 4 1.4,-.6 Ot-14-Y-1.-an wrni...1 sr's:err earo•-ssa-.............. p... ..-----• LonmsmsE+11 liss---..-.11 -7771 Lis.7.---1 -. __A L-7.7.--.) ...------k L:-._—__...11 L-----z--1 --------- •i 1,-,E--. ..3 L7----3/4 6-- ,--7-_,.---- I:I.,. . _ ; •_-• -A ,-------M IIIILII1i111i1 _II I 1----_1 . 1; .. 3 I 1 I I I i 1 1.________I ' INC,,I —1 , 1 i ....-...;,. F ! r"----- 41 II NI wir BLDG('5 iiiii10. LE V,II 11 al rIBILIAVII FlmiliVidi.ssilimass111. M.O1_ 1 1_11 nigg•gmagg_pp_ miggegiogigp.1111,4 ammo imoEMEMENMEWIEMM1111111111,411111111111111Mmo 0,34., 11(0 _16 BLDG•6 efai WO tilk INIIMINImm. LLi ! L I W4 1 1 i t I. I gl 1 i 1 t 1III '^'...saa L___1 I I Law. ct.4. M. Eate: October 23, 1978 BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS REFERRAL MEETING OF October 25, 1978 IIIIIIIIIMIIIIMIMIIIIIIMNIN • Gordon Ericksen, Planning Director Dick Houghton, Engineering SupervisorRonNelson, Building Division Supervisor 4_ . . Paul Lumbert, Traffic Engineering suFJE 7:- . Deferral of Off-Site Improvements, Jack A. Benaroya Co. ,77117-21Ts . Certificate ofof Occupancy, Bldg. 3, 600 S.W. 43rd St. COMMENTS: VIrI11 1166 f. 110 i i ile I/ it d.- 1: ttY; 1. LIV i 1 4: ios:.ri; i I La I '' d i9 ' ;Id 4411 ,,--*:----- R7-:e . 4,11 ad ii rj il ti...........\ C.1.:'.•H.::‘ e;',::,.). i i 1:11.) 1 701 11 i( It.1\,, 1-. :"....:1 14 ilk tt , ploilop'?d d A i 4, .. 4 Jo fitli i'Ll I, • • ti AA( Iii 6 ti/24 ii 440 k I S 1 IV- I d f f i 1/ e 1 ti iiiii III tid: 1 ci'''' hi& r k IL Ir ) i ( NI.-• 1,iJi n . Alt?bt11-) d citi' it ,,, t , o r(/- - tp,e6frt 41, L, tiii „ilidi A ) Ito' I, A, ii rili I s tj-k 4 lk.- is , 4 BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS APPLICATION FOR APPEAL CITY OF RENTON DATE OF FILING October 20, 1978 GRANTED DENIED DATE OF HEARING October 25, 1978 APPEALED 1. NAME OF APPLICANT Jack A. Benaroya Company PLEASE PRINT) 2. ADDRESS 5950 Sixth Avenue South, Seattle, Washington 98108 3. ADDRESS OF PROPERTY INVOLVED 600 - 1000 S. W. 43rd Street 4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY INVOLVED: LOT BLOCK PLAT Portion of N.E. 1/4 of N.E. 1/4 of Section 36, T23N, R4E, W.M. & Govt. Lot 1, Section 31, 723N, R5E, W. M. , in Renton, King County, Washington. 5. PRESENT ZONING M-P 6. EXACT VARIANCE REQUESTED Temporary deferral of completion of off-site nnpruyemenls un S. W. 41st Street and Longacres Parkway for up to 90 days until completion and issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for Building3, 600 S. W. 43rd Street. 7. WHY CAN'T THE PROPERTY BE DEVELOPED WITHIN THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDINANCE? Applicant has building permits for construction of Buildings 1, 2 and 3 located at 1000, 800, and 600 S. W. 43rd Street, respectively, in the new Benaroya Business Park, Renton. Buildings 1 and 2 have been completed and Building 3 is in the final stage of completion. In connection with its building permits for Building 1, 2 and 3, Applicant undertook to construct at its cost certain improvements to S. W. 41st and Longacres Parkway according to plans approved by the City of Renton. As of this date of Min-To-this request, Longacres Parkway is 30% complete and S. W. 41st Street is 20% complete. On the date of hearing of this request, see reverse side)8. WHAT SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES OR CONDITIONS APPLY TO SUBJECT PROPERTY WHICH ARE PECULIAR TO SUCH PROPERTY AND DO NOT APPLY GENERALLY TO PROPERTY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD Contracts for the off-site improvements have been let and the work is well under way. The nature of the improvements which have been undertaken by the applicant are substantial and deferral is required to enable the Applicant to avoid severe economic hardship if the completed portions of the property cannot be use. 9. IS THE VARIANCE REQUESTED THE MINIMUM VARIANCE NECESSARY TO ALLOW THE REASONABLE USE OF THE PROPERTY? Yes 10. WILL THE GRANTING OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE BE IN HARMONY WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY AND NOT INJU- RIOUS TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD OR DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC WELFARE? Yes I DECLARE THAT I AM THE OWNER OF PROPERTY INVOLVED IN THIS APPLICATION AND THAT THE FOREGOING STATEMENTS AND ANSWERS HEREIN CONTAINED AND THE INFORMATION HEREWITH SUBMITTED ARE IN ALL RESPECTS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. CK A. BE 7 SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT Robert Fehnel , Construction Manager 7. Longacres will be 60% complete and S. W. 41st Street 40% complete. It is estimated that if weather permits, all off-site improvements will be complete within 30 days of the date of filing this request. jaer. A. Berl rcya Company 5950 Sixth Avenue South, Seattle, WA 98108 (206)762 4750 60 Op o ,Ar C October 12, 1978 FPgRTM " Warren C. Gonnason, P.E. Public Works Director Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South . Renton, WA 98055 Re: S.W. 41st Street and Longacres Parkway This is in response to your letter of September 19 and confirms several con- versations as noted below. 1 . Illumination. As agreed by Bob Fehnel in his conversation of today with Don Monahan, we will deliver to you today our plans for an illumination system. 2. Conduit for signal at intersection of S.W. 41st and Longacres. This will be provided as agreed. 3. Planning Department request for changes -'n street plans. Our response to these changes requires some background e; pllanation: When we originally discussed plans for Longacres Parkway with the city, we were informed that a center landscaped median would be required. We agreed to this and began our planning accordingly. Later, after our outside street engineering firm Jones Associates) had begun its design work, we were informed by your de- partment of a change in plans, deleting the center landscaped median from Longacres Parkway. We agreed to the change and requested that Jones Associ- ates delete this from their plans. Their plans, as submitted to you, did not show the median. Although several changes to their plan were requested by your department and were agreed to by us, no median was required. Therefore, when you approved our street plans on August 23, 1978, no median was shown or mentioned. Accordingly, we entered into contracts for the street work in late August, 1978, requiring construction per the plans ap- proved by you. On September 12, 1978, Bob Fehnel , Sylvia Otani, and I attended a meeting with the Planning Director and two members of his staff to discuss the site plan for the proposed buildings north of S.W. 41st Street. During the course of this meeting, Mr. Erickson brought to our attention his department's dis- pleasure with tithe deletion of the median in Longacres and other ideas related to our st(DLS T{'RI/l1.Fa-InS.!WAREHOUSES/OFFICE BUILDINGSSHOPPING CENTERS AND SPECIALIZED MERCHANDISE M/.R:S. Warren C. Gonnason October 12, 1978 Page 2 We responded in that meeting by informing Mr. Erickson that we had assumed he was aware of the change in plans and of the above history. We indicated that since contracts had already been let on the approved plans, we would not order any revisions except at the city's expense. Within a few days after that meeting, Dick Houghton called me indicating that your letter of September 19, 1978, would be forthcoming. I repeated in that telephone conversation that contracts were already let, and any re- vision would be at the city's expense. (This does not apply to the illumina- tion; plans for which are being submitted today) . Despite the above, we are now willing to include the bike path and sidewalks as requested in your recent letter. However, our position on the median in Longacres remains as indicated on September 12 to Mr. Erickson and to Mr. Houghton shortly thereafter. Joel Benoliel Legal Counsel cc: Director, Planning Department Jack A. Benaroya Company 5950 Sixth Avenue South, Seattle, WA 98108 (206) 762 4750 RLCFfl/Ep o OCT 12 1978 September 15, 1978 t Gordon Y. Ericksen w Renton Planning Director Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re. Benaroya Business Park - Renton - Phase II Development Required parking for buildings 4, 5, 6 and 7, Benaroya Business Park, Renton, has been calculated on the basis of 5% of total building area being developed into accessory offices for warehousing; warehousing use to constitute 95% of the total building areas. This estimated percentage of usage is based on our experiences with similar multi-tenant buildings controlled by the Jack A. Benaroya Co. Building & Location Total Area Office Earlington Building, Renton, Washington 136,800 sq. ft. 4.6% Benaroya Industrial Park Kent, Washington E-1 229,500 sq. ft. 3.0% E-3 110,400 sq. ft. 3.8% E-4 90,780 sq. ft. 0.8% E-5 84,700 sq. ft. 1 .4% E-6 56,000 sq. ft. 6.1% You will note, the average is 3.28% office area to total building area. We anticipate a similar leasing situation with the 4 multi-tenant Renton buildings and feel the criteria of 5% offices to be completely realistic. Sylvia Otani Architect INDUSTRIAL PARKS/WAREHOUSES/OFFICE BUILDINGS/SHOPPING CENTERS AND SPECIALIZED MERCHANDISE MARTS. o THE CITY OF RENTONU ilop1 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH 98055 AfilL 0 p CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT o o 0 Q- 235- 2550 4) 4I CO SEPIt" September 1 , 1978 Silvia Tahni Jack A. Benaroya Company 5950 Sixth Avenue South Seattle , Washington 98108 RE : Benaroya - Phase II area Dear Ms . Tahni : We have completed preliminary review of your Phase II area located north of S . W . 41st Street . This plan differs from a previous plan submitted to this office on August 16 for preliminary review. Both plans have been analyzed and the following items are noted : 1 ) The connecting street between S . E . 39th and S . W . 41st is not shown on the plan . 2 ) The basic landscaping treatment is not consistent with the Phase I area , and the concepts previously discussed for the Industrial Park . 3 ) The number of driveway approaches to S .W . 41st substantially exceed the number previously agreed upon in the plan received August 16th , and as part of Phase I review. We have prepared a marked-up plan dated September 1 , 1978 , suggesting changes to the proposed site plan and landscaping plan . The following items should be noted and included in your final plan : 1 ) Detailed landscape plan for Sprinabrook Creek. 2 ) Extent of paved areas and weed control at the rear of buildings 4 , 5 and 7 . 3 ) Additional on-site landscaping to provide the following : a . 10 feet adjacent to the street right-of-way ordinance requirement ) b. 2% of total site (City Council Resolution 1923 ) c . 5' of total paved area (ordinance requirement ) d . Consistency with site objectives of the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan a..s.r`: r Silvia Tahni September 1 , 1978 Page -2- 4 ) Location of 41st to 39th Street connecting street . Copies of Hearing Examiner ' s and Engineering Department report attached . ) 5 ) Driveways to align with Phase I area whenever possible . 6 ) Provision of screened/landscaped refuse dumpster location on plans . We hope that these comments will be helpful to you in making the necessary revisions to your plans . Once we have received the revised plans , we will establish a public hearing for Hearing Examiner ' s site plan approval . If you have any questions or wish to meet with us , please do not hesitate to contact this department . Very truly yours , Gordo Y . Ericksen Pla , ng Di r I macW David R. Clemens Associate Planner GYE : DRC ; sh Attachments - I OF Rk.'L A. tf , td,' 2 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON.WASHINGTON ynT' m POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON. WASHINGTON 98055 255-8678 O Q LAWRENCE J.WARREN; CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOG -ASsiS A - TY ATTORNEY it° SEPIE2O August 31, 1978 J,; L 5' ` FnFiVEa 0MEMORANDUM , L.N`.. TO: Michael Smith, Senior Planner SEP 1 1_97$ I 0 I` FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney 4,, 1 Re: Benaroya Industrial Development DEPNR' Your Memo of August 17 , 1978, received by my office on August 21 , 1978, has awaited my return from vacation on August 28 , 1978 for answer. Your first question concerns the necessity of Benaroya following the City' s subdivision ordinance. As mentioned in your letter, the Benaroya property was withdrawn from the Glacier Park Plat and transferred to Benaroya. Therefore that property is still under one ownership. Your Memo also states that Benaroya intends to retain the property under one ownership but the property will be bisected by S .W. 41st. In reviewing the City' s subdivision ordinance, it is plain that that ordinance is based on Chapter 58 . 17 RCW; while subdivision is not defined in such a manner in that title as to definitely answer your question, it would appear that as long as the property stays under one ownership that the subdivision statute, and therefore the City' s subdivision ordinance would not apply. The roadway would require a dedication to the City of a right of way ,but the underlying fee would still be retained by the Benaroya Company. Therefores .it would appear that this property does not need to be platted. With respect to your question No . 3 about the total completion and dedication of improvements required in phase I , the normal method of development of one piece of property would require that the initial site plan be developed within a reasonable period of time . If development begins on phase 2 prior to the completion of all of phase 1 , the City should have no objection as long as the phase 1 requirements were being completed at a reasonable time . A•iO ti_onally, phase 2 approval could be again conditioned upon T: ! lion of phase 1 improvements . We really should treat this I, : ircel of property under one ownership, that is being in stages. The stages may overlap as long as reasonable being made. in all phases . i H :'ely answers your questions . Should you have any r,. . :'cease feet tree to contact me . Ifyou wish a ter J:-Id "`r . enoliel , p1 aye contac m an,: ;o INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date August 30, 1978 TO: Mike Smith FROM: Richard Houghton SUBJECT: Benaroya Dev. As you are aware the property that Benaroya is developing was removed from the Plat (Orilla) and the location of SW 41st St. was changed to coincide with the portion east of Lind Ave. SW. In the latest proposal from Benaroya for the portion of property just north of 41st to the section line between Lind and Longacres they did not show the roadway connection from 41st to 39th. As we understand they had agreed to construct this connection. (See attached sketch.) 1(. 1.A- Ali RCI I:pmp 1\(\3 PECFNED /a AUG 30 197b 9 24/ NG DEP PfS+ z iiII 400 1 1 0 Cr' c, 1_ \ 1... ,'h .236800 i c, I / p j` " 1 655 so f As) 225775 co 1 550 0 i. 0 ( 1 i Q 264300 i/5 iO o \ j 1 i, I % 810 0 t / to d 4454000 1 i 1 3 i 0 CY. 6 j' 251500 EP j i 3433 20 m 1 Q i i i y o D9 /i , o i 6) i S.W 39 M St. ILO I 6 0 in 280 z l I R00 1 . 189600 m / lO f I• V j 0 1 4 LJl'"' i a O 374000 u1 1 I ,n 2372006 A a 8 0 ` Cr i 715 j i -- -- i— ' 0 1 725 1 i 11 O•% i off i I 1 2140004 h O I l O 7 vi 1 1 V \ t.--i7 i -- ro a.h 11 ;8 o 700 7 2f -- 76f u t I/ / ! I I aoo SW. 41 sf St. 1 f 4 f 'F ll 12.• 1 4 1 c5- rr I Aefen r`f-moo 1e0rC1 4 4 , tII rQ rr. 370 I ) 120 370 4ralt Ik-rrr 80 T5 rrr ` SW.--end St. 365 420 r_ 370- - 420--- ------ab0 --- j j Lr-----• 175 - 175• 0 1042000 41 / 180 IL Zr)0 7752CrIVZ-' ---- 2130000 cD 6 5 266500 41-272000 0-, 8 kn ,n 8 278Q30 V l0 r, l0 0 N 19 0---` co co.y / In 0 19 5 \ i 0. 20.0-- 1; i 1 I i 40C\ 1 I 440 420 1 420 1 40a_ / 860 i S. W. 43rd Street i i ALTERNATE 1 J Pa 10' ki EXPANSION JOINTtoS. LrrrJ is,/ I..3p., MAN e' e, 10—EXPANSION JOINT (TYP. ) i 3 M44. 1 2' FOR WIDTH LESS THAN 20‘ iirkil4II`. i s is" FOR WIDTH GREATER THAN 20' e,' MA! EXPANSION JOINT(TYR) VAR.VOL! EXPANSION JOINT — 103 10°/ MAX. SLOPE n..'. 6.. Otikkii,141 SECTION A-A EXPANSION JOINT r I.. ALTERNATE 2q 3p,M I e.. S. EXPANSION JOINT (TYP.) 30' GENERAL NOTES 30', IP' 414 t,AAF) s y JQINTS Joints shall be placed as shown CITY OF RENTONorasdirectedbytheEngineer ENGINEERING DIVISION CONCRETE Concrete shall be 14 day Class 5(1-1/2) STANDARD COMMERCIAL air entrained Portland cement concrete CEMENT CONC. DRIVEWAY F PROCEDURES All work shall be in accordance with A.P. W.A. DESIGNEDRR DATE 10-77 plans and spbcificotions or as directed by DRAWN the Engineer. APPROVEDe Public Works Director l if, 111FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the r c gar, ` #- Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 43 2- /t45 .1 1. The request is for approval of a site plan for three buildings, each square foot area, in an M-P zone. 2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this marts , and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. The proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, landscaping, lot coverage and height requirements of Section 4-730 (M-P) and Chapter 22 (Parking and Loading) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances and Resolution No. 192 except that 23 additional parking stalls are required. 8. The final plat of Orillia Industrial Park has not been submitted to date. A preliminary plat (PP-086-77) was approved by the City Council on January 9, 1978. An examination of the preliminary plat reveals the Benaroya proposal is nonconforming as follows: a. Addition of one more railroad spur. b. Alignment of S.W. 42nd Street to be in line with S.W. 41st Street. c. Reduction of the number of lots in Block 4. d. Lengthening the lots adjacent to S.W. 43rd Street and lessening the length of the remaining lots of Block 4. e. Connection of S.W. 39th Street to what was S.W. 42nd Street. 9. Burlington Northern sold property within and part of the preliminary plat to the Jack Benaroya Company prior to submittal of the final plat. This action was in violation of Section 9-1110.2 of the Subdivision Ordinance (see attached legal opinion from Assistant City Attorney) . 10. Exhibits #2 and #3 indicate that the property purchased by the Benaroya Company existed as two individual tax lots prior to the Orillia Industrial Park preliminary plat. Testimony was not given as to the period of existence of these two tax lots. These lots were not shown in the record of the Orillia Industrial Park preliminary plat. 11. With full knowledge of information supporting findings #8, #9, and #10, the applicant testified of the williingness to proceed with the application. The applicant also testified that the purchase contract obligated the Benaroya Company to complete the final plat of the purchased property. - o p, emu. ;c.. . N 4 it t- *-ice' m 16 I t2 .... owl( ogr 1411bAiILIA z. 6,,,,. : 1 M 0-O II m m wy.Roditot.p a . , 1 aws m m 3to 1 ij4 4•_ .,.ap• ,. -. O iLLIA INDUSTRIAL_ CAR. E V H I B I T NO. 7 (EM 4 S SEA CIED) 4400- RAIL.R0A0 CK 1 1 N). PP roIiR084 - 7? TOAPN`! LOT LING Awi///i e7/A///.J// ` 0,7 . 0 1. Nome OF 4 O PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Z BUILDING DIVISION 235 - 2540 0 . MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055o O,Q TED SEPZE ' CHARLES J. DELAURENTI August 21, 1978 MAYOR TO: Warren Gonnason FROM: Jim Hanson SUBJECT: Benaroya Development We have no objections to proposed project as shown on preliminary plans. JCH/mp i INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date August 18, 1978 TO: Warren C. Gonnason FROM: Dick Houghton SUBJECT: Benaroya Business Park (N. of 41st) With the improvements to Longacres Parkway, SW 41st and Lind Ave. SW. all underway, there should be no problems with this project. On site drainage, sanitary lines and water lines should be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings. RCH:pmp 1 OF y 0 THE CITY OF RENTON o ` ® Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 ml CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9A co. 235-2550 091t 0 SEP1 0 MEMORANDUM August 16 , 1978 TO : Warren Gonnason , Public Works Director FROM: Michael L . Smith , Senior Planner RE : PROPOSED PHASE 2 , BENAROYA DEVELOPMENT , GREEN RIVER VALLEY Attached for your review and comment is a copy of preliminary site plan for the subject develop- ment . Please direct any input you might have to this department. A full site plan approval application will be submitted for review in two to three weeks . Thanks . MLS : wr Attachment RECEIVED AUG 14 0' 3 CITY Bcc woks 1 , ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : Finance Department Fire Department Library Department OPark Department OPolice Department Publi Works Department Building Div . 0 Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description ) 4) Traffic Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his d i nee ) bytho t.r/i/to;‘,-4‘DATE : l i'nG J PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : REZONE MAJOR PLAT SITE APPROVAL U SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE qqv/ REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :OLD 013,1 Approved ED Not Approved Comments or conditions : Signature o lector or Authorized Representative Date 7j REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : E:2- Approved Q Not Approved Comments or conditions : Gc r91 k /114t,.v 4A.,/ /•{y/aic'4,c,-7" .9d' 2gal-ea z.2 f3Y G.-9 < C(/ /1-, 4-6- J}x- 7 Gjc'u vA/-L S7/1A,/DA/r& G i;W f/ram , Z caA,A,- C7 YS /PC6ui.PC`, p v i3/.r2C. plus i ,'-i6i '.FC. "eau/.P`rH z.;S /-, ' 7,//,:f f v,C7- - Qw// /-is .5 3e- /'IGfr Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : EE] Approved CM Not App..t'oved Comments or conditions : D / Y a a. $-t" .G *C/ d t_ S' SG.,1 '7 ,j w.!G( fl-G co,"N r.: a C" <.t /Q`! l 4.11 4(r,.,f s.r. .• r- 3) S ' I , a s ,. 7 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date j'7C /liA'f,• ..i<",t-.1;- e`•C=e7 !rl-: , .,? .1 /r'.!<!1 i A-'fi '%'l.e:'• r,,l,>r}-it REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : UTtt_tTtrS J Approved En Not Approved Comments or conditions : COhtTAL UTLLITtrS rNGil-t1:[:tZj tc, roR 1 FORM"<itor< or-t v11 r(-091 l;TIJ. C_1.4641.4oet?zs&C. (J2 wtr- Foil nor-k T 4 r ARt.,. Rt.Qo To sl; .4 Ttit= StTf_ STIJ. uTLLITit3s c. c.sof= ict-/GI. off' sIT(.1 Pltio/z rb sritocr uTt rtl_5 !'t-AkS IZ Q Viziort 7o cohsT. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : e rtment : 7'>'3 ` / Approved h Not Approved omrlrents or conditions : L) l 1 Lt c G r 10, r ETL () L r..-;ry`r t?Er U es2; 7 e' 1/Vrit:r‘ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative y Date ' REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : C Approved Q Not Approved Comments or conditions : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date E 4 r. ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: 1!l) Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department 0 Public Works Department f'7i-eLt, Gvd 0 Building Div. l Engineering Div. 1j$ Traffic Engineering Div. Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee),rAr.fil(i 16. SUBJECT : Review of ECF- '/ Application No . : g Action Name : e1/01-er, ike ," I4/6. ,7/ 4ydt/e / Lid ,-.f''(I/ Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) : /197fh Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ig L(- Ill Approved 1 j Not Approved Comments : A, e ( A‘444.----- Signature of Director " Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : -1J/2 r Approved INot Approved Comments : frffi (..r "v/3 ,v`/42,e4 i 7S AS ieC ui/ete7 B , G//17G'e G c i ,CC,vt-6s m O ///.to e/'ii/ .. //vR/c'oA-4-4-6_ S%'F.1-' P/./-ec zd.,/7-/ /i.Pe-• G`i'r c,,, _,c c C'7io,L S Z. I.//.C7cr/7 a/v /1 c 4 . /i1 . /Iris 7 /lf47 GI-/ c' ,,c°C 44,/' ' ' -c.75 f`-' 7///S i_/,2'e 7Cc / ,1 / /9t,c i:4 seP i see04/4e6:/,-rc:'.c77S (9/' de,-/ ;—- / A,,,e4 3G.x• /5 QC 3- 2 e--r/ 6//, /7; Signature f Director or Auth rized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :z,_Ft•-,.,.,_ Approved Not Appjoved Comments : Signature of Director or Authoriz Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : U T«. t -n r s p Approved j.J Not Approved Comments : UL111--fATI? S 1Ti or_.iaLuiPrz e[f Qvt 2V:: Aevi; oti.S To 1 Z r3 ,- G , wATet12 .lsOLQ1,- Sy5T(?-t$ , 16AZ* 0-Z7- IfsSignatureofDirectororAuthorizedRepresentativeDate REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Depatment : 1 y8 Piic tc.' •-tr°CV I1- tsA roved t "' Not Approved Comments .: 74 r Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : U_J Approved 1 Not Approved Comment : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date NDING OF FILE FILE TITLE 1jt 1 O,,t11 me 1 2p I 6i . 7E5