Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA78-258BEGINNIAG OF FILE FILE TITLE cili1U,3FILMED 258 :70 i OF R4, y o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE SO. RENTON, WASN. 98055 o . CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9Q O L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 O P 9 1f0 SEPS0 December 14, 1978 Mr. John Desanto Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. P.O. Box 538 Allentown, PA 18105 RE: File No. SA-258-78; Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. Dear Mr. Desanto: t This i to notify you that the above referenced request, which was app:ov d subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of November 29, 1978, has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing. Sin . ely, L. 'ck Beeler Hearin Examiner cc: P anning Department City Clerk AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 29th day of November 19 78 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this day of kov Q w\, Q 19 1(‘ . c\(Kck{' Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton Application, Petition or Case: Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. SA-258-78 The mi.nuta contain a £ia.t of the paxt%e6 ob necond) November 29, 1978 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEAR LNG EXAMINER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION . APPLICANT: Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. FILE NO. SA-258-78 LOCATION: S.W. corner of S.W. 10th Street and Powell Avenue S.W. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks site approval of a facility for the transfer of industrial gas from bulk liquid form to a gas form in an M-P zone. There will not be any manufacturing at the site. SUMMARY OF ACT]ON: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on November 22, 1978. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on November 28, 1978 at 9: 35 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. David Clemens, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2: Site Plan as amended Exhibit #3: Landscaping Plan as amended Exhibit #4: Building Elevations Mr. Clemens indicated that amendments denoted on Exhibits #2 and 3 had been reviewed and approved by the applicant. He also reported that Recommendation No. P.7 would be deleted from Exhibit #1 since the site and landscaping plans had been amended as recommended. The Examiner asked the representative for the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was: John Desanto Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. P.O. Box 538 Allentown, PA 18105 Mr. Desanto indicated his concurrence in the report. He advised that exterior masonry of the proposed structure will consist of architectural fluted block and sprayed to the approved color. He noted that a metal fascia panel of a darker color will be constructed above the fluted block. Mr. Desanto reported that no bulk storage of fuel would occur on the site with the exception of diesel fuel to be utilized by trucks, and storage vessels would contain only inert gas and oxygen. The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the request. There was no response. He then inquired regarding the proposed exterior color of the structures. Mr. Desanto deferred the question to his associate. Responding was: Ken Long Architecture & Planning 100 Mercer Street Seattle, WA 98109 Mr. Long reported that earthen-tone colors would be utilized on proposed structures. He indicated that the fluted block would be lighter in color than metal fascia in tones of beige-white and beige-gray and the only other accent would be provided by the clay color of the overhead doors which will be slightly darker than the metal fascia. He noted that glass would be a solar bronze color with a minimum amount of bronze anodized aluminum trim I' SA-258-78 Page Two in gl s areas. The Ex finer asked if the full gas dock located in the northern portion of the property would ontain an elevated platform. Mr. Desanto reported that the dock, which will be elevat four feet above the surrounding grade, would be enclosed on three sides and open o the eastern side, and constructed with the same materials as the main building. The Ex: 'ner inquired regarding the height of the walls and if the structure would contai a roof. Mr. Desanto reported that the roofed structure would be a height of 12 fee above the finished floor to a maximum of 16 feet above the finished grade. Respon;ing to the Examiner's inquiry regarding the proposed design motif of the dock, Mr. Lo g reported that although the same wall material and color as the main building would .e utilized, the fascia would not be as accentuated because of the small scale of the pr•posed structure. The E . miner requested clarification from Mr. Clemens regarding an environmental impact determ nation for the proposal. Mr. Clemens reported that a declaration of environmental non-si.nificance had been determined for the proposal. The Ex. iner inquired if the proposal meets the requirements for air quality in the M-P zone. Mr. Clemens responded affirmatively. The Examiner inquired if landscape requirements for wildlife habitat mitigation had been met by the proposal in conformance to Res4lution No. 1923. Mr. Clemens indicated that the amount of proposed landscaping far ex. eeds the requirements. The Examiner inquired if the Public Works Department had approv-• the storm drainage plans. Mr. Clemens reported that although the plans had not yet bean submitted, completion prior to issuance of a building permit is required. The Ex iner requested the Planning Department final recommendation. Mr. Clemens advised that t e recommendation would remain as submitted with deletion of Section P.7 of Exhibit 1. The Ex miner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No. SA-258-78 was closed by the Examiner at 10:00 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDIN S: 1. Th request is for approval of a site plan for an industrial gas transfer facility in an M-P zone. 2. Th Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies an provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, is uncontested, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. 3. Pu suant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Po icy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance ha been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. P1 s for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. Th- e was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. The proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, lot coverage, air quality and hei.ht requirements of Section 4-730 (M-P) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of Gen-ral Ordinances. Inert gas and oxygen will be stored in metal tanks for transfer to rucks. Some diesel fuel for use by these trucks will also be stored on the site. 8. The proposal meets the requirements of the Parking and Loading Ordinance (Chapter 22) , Tit e IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances. 9. Sid-walks are not proposed on the site plan, Exhibit #2, but this construction is req fired as part of normal off-site improvements per Ordinance No. 3214. 10. Sto 111 drainage plans have not been submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval. These plans are required per Ordinance No. 3174. SA-258-78 Page Three 11. Color of the buildings are to be earthen tones. 12. The northerly "full gas dock" building (Exhibit #2) will consist of three walls 16 feet in height of the same design as the main building. The same materials and color treatment will be used. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposal conforms to the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, June, 1976. This design represents ". . .high operational, development and environmental standards. " Section 4-730.010 - Purpose - M-P) . 2. Roof-top mechanical equipment details were not submitted. This equipment could potentially produce visual impact upon the northerly residential hillside. Such impact should be minimized (page 8, Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, June, 1976) . The Planning Department can satisfactorily review and approve this aspect of the development. 3. Landscaping immediately adjacent to and westerly of the proposed storage tank area Exhibit #3 - abutting the north side of the main building) is indicated to be deciduous type trees. Since the intent of this landscaping is screening of this outdoor storage area, it appears more appropriate that dense coniferous trees be planted adjacent to the security fence so as to constitute an effective sight screen. This type of tree would provide screening throughout the year instead of the warmer months. (pages 6 and 7, Ibid) 4. Additional reiriew is necessary of the proposed screening of the railroad car storage area at the northeast corner of the site (Exhibit #3) for conformance with the requirements of Section 4-730.030.5. This storage area may require additional screening considerations through use of the proposed fence. The Planning Department can adequately review and approve this portion of the development. DECISION: Approval of Exhibits #2, 3 and 4, subject to: 1. Review and approval by the Planning Department of roof-top mechanical equipment for conformance with the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan. 2. Review and approval by the Planning Department of adequacy of the easterly screening fence adjacent to the railroad car storage area per Section 4-730.030.5. 3. Addition of dense coniferous landscape screening adjacent to the westerly fence abutting the outdoor storage tank area. This landscaping is to constitute an effective sight screen per review and approval of the Planning Department. 4. Addition of sidewalks along Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. 10th Street per review and approval of the Public Works Department. 5. Submittal of storm drainage plans for review and approval of the Public Works Department. 6. Approval of the State Flood Zone Control Permit by King County Hydraulics Division and Department of Ecology. 7. Final review and approval of the landscape plan by the Planning Department. 8. Review and approval by the Planning Department of conformance of the "full gas dock" building with the design and materials of the main building. ORDERED THIS 29th day of November, 1978.7 J L. Rick Beeler Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 29th day of November, 1978 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: John Desanto, Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. , P.O. Box 538, Allentown, PA 18105 Ken Long, Architecture & Planning, 100 Mercer Street, Seattle WA 98109 U SA-258-78 Page Four TRANSMITTED THIS 29th day of November, 1978 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Councilwoman Patricia Seymour-Thorpe Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursu- t to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be fi ed in writing on or before December 13, 1978. Any aggrieved person feeling that the d ision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in ju•• ent, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at thz. prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourte-n (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth he specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that s ch appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeti • other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspec ion in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purcha-ed at cost in said office. RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT HEARING EXAMINER NOV 281978 PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER AM PM PUBLIC HEARING 7,8t9,10,il,12,1,2t i4,5,6 NOVEMBER 28 , 1978 APPLICANT : AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS , INC . (John Desanto) FILE NO: SA-258-78 EXHIBIT NO.. A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: ITEM NO. ,.c/- The applicant seeks site approval of a facility for the transfill of industrial gas from bulk liquid form to a gas form in an M-P Zone. There will not be any manufacturing at the site . B. GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : BURLINGTON NORTHERN , INC . 2 . Applicant : AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS , INC . John Desanto ) 3 . Location : S . W. corner of S . W . 10th Street and Powell Avenue S . W. 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5 . Size of Property : 3 acres 6 . Access :Via S . W. 10th Street and Powell Avenue S . W . 7 . Existing Zoning : M-P , Manufacturing Park 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : M-P , Manufacturing Park ; "0" , General Classification District. 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Manufacturing Park 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST : To permit construction of the proposed facility in order to distribute the gas to retail distributors and to sell directly to customers . D . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by ordinance #1745 dated April 14, 1959 . The current M-P zoning was adopted by Ordinance 2337 on June 12 , 1967 . E . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography : The site is essentially level . 2 . Soils : Urban land (Ur) . The erosion hazard is slight to moderate . No capability or woodland classification . 3 . Vegetation : The site consists principally of scrub grass and a few blackberry bushes . 4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site may provide suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS , INC . (John Desanto ) , File No ; NOVEMBER 28, 1978 SA-258-78 PAGE TWO 5 . Water : No surface water was observed on the subject site . 6 . Land Use: The siteitself is presently undeveloped . Adjacent properties are either existing or developing industrial park uses . F . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The site is within the Earlington Industrial Park . G. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer: A 12" water main extends north-south along Powell Avenue S . W. and a second 12" main runs east-west on S . W. 10th Street. A 24" sanitary sewer runs north-south on Powell Avenue S . W. and an 8" sewer extends east-west on S . W. 10th Street . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department in accordance with ordinance requirements . 3 . Transit: Metro Transit Route #240 and 161 operate along S . W. Grady Way within 500 feet to the south of the subject site . 4 .. Schools : Not applicable . 5 . Parks : Not applicable . H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-730 , Manufacturing Park . I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT : 1 . Green River Comprehensive Plan , June 1976 . J . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL SYSTEMS : Minimal . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS : Not applicable . L . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a declaration of negative impact has been issued for the subject proposal . This declaration is further based on the provision of suitable landscaping , screening , and other development standards which reduce visual and other impacts of the development and are consistent with M-P zone standards and Comprehensive Plan objectives . M . ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : A site map is attached . N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS , INC . (John Desanto ) File No : NOVEMBER 28 , 1978 SA-258-78 PAGE THREE 0 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The proposed use is compatible with the manufacturing Park land use designation of the Comprehensive Plan . 2. The applicant proposes to construct a transfill facility for gases from a bulk liquid form to a gas form. The development consists of a main building containing approximately 2000 square feet of office space and 6900 square feet of transfill area . A separate 1900 square foot fuel gas dock is proposed . An exterior 1200 square foot area for liquid storage tanks is located adjacent to the main building . A small scale truck fueling station is proposed at the north end of the : paved ;truck access area . 3. The parking requirements for this facility would be as follows : Office 2000 square feet = 10 spaces Transfill 6900 square feet = 7 spaces Fuel gas dock 1900 square feet = 2 spaces Exterior tank storage 1200 square feet = 1 space TOTAL : 20 spaces required , 25 provided 4 . The proposed gas distribution facility is consistent with the manufacturing park zone permitted use , setbacks , land- scaping , and other requirements . Additional landscapinghasbeenprovidedtoinsurecompatibilitywithfutureM-P uses in the area , and other performance standards . 5 . The proposed site plan and landscaping area is consistent with Comprehensive Plan objectives and the requirements of Resolution No . 1923 between the City of Renton and Soil Conservation Service (Comprehensive Plan , Green River Valley ,June , 1976 , valley and site objectives , pp . 5-8 ) . Because of the large expanses of asphalt , and the potentialforstorageoftrucksandtrailers , additional landscape buffering and screening fence have been provided around the periphery of the site and within the site interior . The tree screen of the exterior tank storage should be increased . By reducing the length of four parking spaces to 15 ' (compact stall length ) , screen tree planting canbeextendedintothisarea . 6 . Drainage plans must be coordinated with the Engineering Division and shall be subject to final approval by that division , with the provision of suitable on-site retention and oil /water separation facilities and connection of down- spouts to the system. 7 . Utility plans shall be coordinated with and approved by the Public Works and Fire Departments . 8 . The final concrete tilt-up building exterior treatment and color shall be compatible with M-P Ordinance and Comprehen- sive Plan objectives subject to Planning Department approval (Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan , objectives , June , 1976 ) . 9. A Flood Zone Control Permit is required for the subject site development . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS , INC . (John Desanto ) File No . NOVEMBER 28 , 1978 SA-258-78 PAGE FOUR 11 . Proposed height of the building is approximately 20 feet , which is consistent with the height requirements of the M-P zone . 12 . Sidewalks are required on S . W. 10th and Powell Avenue S . W. 13 . The applicant should note the comments of other divisions attached . P . PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION : Approval subject to the following conditions : 1 . Sidewalks shall be installed in accordance with full City standards and in accordance with Public Works Department approval . 2 . Final Planning Department approval of landscape , berming , and screening plans per 0 , Analysis , No ' s 5 and 9 . 3. Provision of suitable on-site storm water retention and oil /water separation facilities per Public Works Department approval and ordinance requirements . 4 . Provision of suitable utilities per Public Works and Fire Departments ' approval . 5. Approval of a state Flood Zone Control Permit by King County Hydraulics Division and Department of Ecology. 6. Building exterior treatment and color shall be compatible with M-P Ordinance standards and Comprehensive Plan objec- tives per Planning Department approval . 7 . The site and landscaping plan shall be amended to provide tank storage area screening through the placement of trees at the front of four parking spaces which shall be designa- ted as "compact" spaces per Analysis No . 5 . ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : O Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department / IV i O Park Department LaQ/i01604i)ro/ fof ice Department Public Works Department / - O ilding Div. Engineering Div. Ei) Traffic Engineering Div. Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his 4designee )) Sail rAPl'VIP g DATE : i) PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: r fit£MAJOR PLAT 4gf ,Lx,t32 SITE APPROVAL 44 '096' /4i SHORT PLAT PECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE Il 21 /b REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :LAT I Comments : 01 S Q l=r . Fib a_rJovca___ 0175a F t, FwL-._ Sc3./e2 POc-S t 6LE Cent $Et'6- 1=c0G; Nvor/A 7-" 2c:c1 Liman AL ) /4 L(.._- C_c 1 C.r L),VS n t,t/ cea- S/S Tc---t w 1 L c_ Z .tJut2c= ac oucco PezEss-q 6/10''=1;"-'"-/ i°g-t llri°AI lOr;L LCL-r 0.1ito\ s4--,- 1 l_ (S- Zs Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : DC_a Comments : 2( 0 -/6 16/ 7 /) L---- -1) 61) a e4- 3z:de, e'eed-f. r--- Signature oirector or Authorized Representative Date 7 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :y7/'ie e 41- Comments : 7 • e/ 7{':.;) Signature of Director or Authorized ReP reseditative Dat ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : O ' nance Department Fire Department Library Department V% O Park Department aAn•It6g10 Police Department24) Public Works Department O Building Div. OEngineering Div . 13 Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee ) J eitivfor {, r / V 1 g DATE : I ! /Z PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: RUNE MAJOR PLAT 462 fraX)C1-4 SITE APPROVAL 44704 -g1/6"?6 SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT J WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE I1 21 /b REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ,- ,',' '- Comments : fria,5 fe---//it /L5/ /'</3iv j S`//o':/.c../G" ic-i27--: ieU- C"7-io4„) PZ;wet. `S• /3tiio /9%%0/-/, ,t_ CC.- /.- /c i/'S /-w 'fe ( rj L` ,(,:i.L) f/% ..(7//'ir/Cti` i0:2. 7/7/ ,ic' r /.: S/7 Z Atiip 0Mrlcc`;r-/ S l_` r 4:)-77e Signature of Director or Auth rize epresentative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Pa k Department olice Department r Public Works Department 9 10 tOtixrAgii Rfilding Div. Engineering Div. OTraffic Engineering Div. O Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) 24u11ig arit(ra 1i I416 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 4-IO-y5 ; Application No . : ,A e*5 -T5 Action Name : At12 prepsigil . t9AJ 1()1 4 qut w Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : 4 'U 1 Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : L._.,.p, ..- .( , -^ j ] Approved JNot ApproveComments : nq S --/ /v r/z. iI v..c.r. a...c.1"t_:. /Lc° (.cN1.cK- "'. L o--cJ-2 y e ,(,). 0 ,. , .axxi L.A. 1 J. y., —G Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ill'i(.17L( Approved LJNot Approved Comments : 01 / S4 FT Foe (V4r62 of sc:l Ft Fez S JE2 d c\_ it— is-7g Signature off Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : De tment : Jr—• ace Approved JNot Approved Jl F l r /G ! Comments : C? i/t/ eD l C Signature of Director or Authorized Represen;aiive Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: Q Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department flt6PoliceDepartment it) Q Public 'ks Department g' Yat Building Div. Engineering Div. Q Traffic Engineering Div. Q Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his designee ) VAu17 g ariiitA4 11 I4 It' SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 4-10-1' ; Application No . : 2q ' Action Name : i/R pt42 i • timj Iola 4 Nat, Please review the attached. Review requested by (date ) : 4 'u lb Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : k '- Approved LJ Not Approved Comments : 7,,--,crr- ...,,,ice, ,,„.„..„ ,.,.....,-,, 6 z) e-67 6/1!--.;I"- ' 1 r CA c, ,(1 ,/---7---7L7 e e 747 4- 0K al z .e (' ,-- C (C_, .-2 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: O F ' ance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department ill' 1° Public Works Department Building Div.8 Engineering Div. Ti Traffic Engineering Div. Q Utilities Engineeiing Div. FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee ) 902 g aritit 111141/6 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 4I49.-?g5 ; Application No . : A -r2m -76 Action Name : 14I12 uld j '• J lt) it fOJW Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) : 4 0 lb Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : De artment : i-l1ec Approved LJNot Approved Comments : t/u 5 i , ,i,C.v. S// /•'L/3/-' ,S'i/4. /'c/C" li/C tgec'7 7,v,: JJ V/'Gr.S /3n-0 /9t`L.//I/t c.S /X-7 7//i/S //I67/<-/i% o 1 C / d—r."- **. v (''— i 7 ) Signature ofDirector or Authorize' •epr- entative Date tea. _ -' A x.,. 4 a L' .,1 'fi 4-\ +''t C 1 ". ihW•--ifHiHF- .,1#' 11111111i —---- 1 • • '! v 1 b, s a a e s V. i tcw F'_ 1 fit _. .- .,a7i t.OFFICE ! C UNDER1 I I i!,/, s-<_r . r31. swfl k2.MI. GAS DOCKJ-- JEC.J JJ'SI SC<. :EN z s.2 c+,_,r 3.TRAC OR FUELING J STATION 1 I V r.L . ti.1 0• /11.. aasaaxo i' l \ Is.. is aoe a Fww z 4 sot PILka IR. n la 1‘.1 Rya 1 1_ 1 V 1:Fat SC<n=.l s, 1 tr T7`f?—s. pri4...s._C,1. fir.".rc4 ,7r•.\-1 % , =--- t _:a. ..a . L 1 1 s..e:.e e..c s..aaa Ia4.)s 4 N' Al,4 :N .V t._: S.'s -. 1?_.1S l gg 8 l { 1 , p i 1 t a m Powell Avows ex vro414NA-M coidirPer IFM64) SITE PLAN .C.L.,,-:le-: CMNI c a) 00-602 . ': fly'• I 0 " f ram . ,, f Q i 1i o F f .„ t. .il* 44., st. i.4I.... --_.'" A--/0aA1is0// \' Th;'•.'\-\- iC_,N-\ 0, 7' i M l r YY.ZSIL s- ,,• v i ..„,„-, ., UNSdE.IT 7 B7LVD r :,. 00:l y1V . gibs il4' Z. Ji a`ti©4J ^ t v G cvv.. 2.....___.::..s w _ 7714 — _ ._ W Q SY a k. T R JI1If 1111 1;1; la . , IIIuup man n.1 j R 111U10111110 . G S A L ACIf c MIS I ill I. 11 l III li111illlgomil -_ d R I111111 . . - 1 , i f l i ' ' f`E9NIIlI_1 = , 11 I I IIh . I wlrl% V A oll i . k L / 1111111 pr l I IO . • 1111 I- 1 . II II 1 11111 III q UlIIIf_Ilp1 IIIr I l i yiiUi:I! I luII q IIIp ll 1I_ 000,1 :dlly !:; m / - - W iiirliir yam h, 7. jii11I i..40 Tra I ftU:1.11.-;- _- V Cis i - i p I_Will. !mat: I B-I LII III III' r - I__ i r-=i1 im ri rr NN I L ! _ 4_i .f / I W I 1 (l t V. _ .A . DS, 1 44.-1- ;5=.i.; .1:), ; 44 _ . ,, f-:, I; U L- -i; ! T ' a ii - I-J 1.. T1-f' l ."'' y i - l V: 3! T I..I I -{ 1 `• 1 'fit, . -I - 1 y I FL 1,11L14Y ME ADER D0I1.1 ATION CLAM 1 —1 r— 1 r_ 1,... I ! I---_. SITE APPROVAL : AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS , INC . APPLICANT AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC.TOTAL AREA ±3 acres PR I NC I IAL ACCESS Via S.W. 10th Street and Powell Avenue S.W. EXIST I F G ZONING M-P, Manufacturing Park EXISTING USE Undeveloped PROPOSED USE Transfill facility for gases from a bulk liquid form to a gas form. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park COMMENTS I OF RE/V. REC NEO0 CITY OF RENTON Ad a0v 14 1918A. APPLICATION o _ _ - -... ----e4Z SITE APPROVAL FOR O ' CE USE G DE File No. a-ig Filing Date J 71 Application Fee $ Receipt No . Environmental Review Fee $ APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1 . Name Air Products and Chemicals Inc.Phone (215) 398-4911 Address P.n. Box 538, Allentown. Pennsylvania 18105 2 . Property location S.W. 10th and Powell Ave. SW Renton, Washington 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) Thp S nil thPrly 517.96' -f of lot 1 measured along Powell Ave. S .W1 Rarlinton Industrial Park No. 2, Renton Washing ton. 4. Number of acres or square feet Apprnx_ 'i acres Present zoning M-P 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? Fari l i ty fur 4;sj-ti;}.,t j e ..Q f T rvi„a t r i a l gas_ 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B. Parking , landscaping and screening plan . . . . 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) 7 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION : Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed r r: Appeal Action Remarks Planning Dept . Rev, 1-77 AFFIDAVIT J. J. Gordon being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 17th day of November 19 78 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at 0/4,441. BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC. BY: L614._ Manager - am of Notar ublic) Si ure of Owner) Property Mgmt. Lobby 2, Central Building 2/y/ " Seattle, WA 98104 Address)Address) Seattle, Washington City) State) 625-6682 Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be_ orough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rul`- Ty F rm ations of the Renton Planning Department governing the fit / - ofC jb /a lication . RC(: I%/%b V O Date Received 9 By: i • T2 4:1' r DE AR3 Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 PROPOSED/FINAL LtLLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/ i'4uN-SIGNIFICANCE Application No. SA-258-78 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-410-78 Xa FINAL Declaration Description of proposal The applicant seeks site approval of a facility for the transfill of industrial gas from bulk liquid form to a gas form in an_M-P zone. There will not be any manufacturing at the site . Proponent AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS , INC. Location of Proposal SW corner of S.W. 10th Street and Powell Ave. S.W. Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposial has been determined to 0 have ® not have a significant, adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS is pis not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) (c ) . This decision was made after ''review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . non Reasons for declaration of environmental /significance : This declaration is based on the provision of suitable landscaping, screening, and other development standards which reduce visual and other impacts of the development and are consistent with M-P zone standards and Comprehensive Plan objectives. Measures , ' f any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmen al impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw i s declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/ final ) declaratio of non- significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen Title Plan g/%i.re• or Date November 21, 1979 Signature _Ai /„ , . ,// Of City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON R ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM a CE1 Eo 91/ 3 NON 9 1918 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY pp A` Application No. 9 P,f IN QP Environmental Checklist No. = (!C 1/G - 1G ( 347 a—O ////9/71' G 17 PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: Declara .ion of Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance a Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS : Introductian The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state .and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own action ; and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared far all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believ? an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanatioi in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washinston for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your propcsal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACMGROUND 1 . Name of Proponent Air Products and Chemicals Inc. 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: P. 0. Box 538, Allentown,Pennsylvania 18105 Attention: John 0esanto Phone: (215) 398-4911 3. Date Checklist submitted November 8, 1978 4. Agency requiring Checklist Renton Planning Dept. 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. , District Facility 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : A main building of approximately 8900 sq, ft. on a site of approximately 3 acres. Tnere 1s also to be a small fuel gas covered dock of approximately 1900 facility is to be used for the transfill of Industrial Gas from bulk liquid form to a gas form for distribution to retail distributors and to direct sale custolfiers. There will nbt be any manufacturing at the site. ts 2- 1. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of mental setting of the proposal ) : The project is located in a M-P, Manufacturing Park District, commonly called the Earlington (No. 2) Industrial Park. The project fronts on SW Ieith St. and Powel Ave. SW. The area his warehousing and. distribution facilities. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : August, 19 7g.- 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals requi :-t- + i ,; ti•• federal , state and local --including rezones) : Site Review Permit, building permits - including mechanical and electrical . 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal ? If yes , explain: Nn 11 . Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain : No. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Building permit applications. II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X YES MAYBE WU— b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil ? X YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief Xfeatures? YES— FfAY WO— d) The destruction, covering or modification of any X unique geologic or physical features? YES- MAYBE F e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? X MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the X bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Yn— MAYBE NO Explanation:1 (b) Displacement and overcovering as required for footing and floor slab placement. 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in : a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X YES MAYet Iru b) The creation of objectionable odors? X Y MAPbr 05_ c) Alteration of air movement , moisture or temperature , or any change in climate , either locally or regionally? X YES MWYBE Nei-- Explanation : 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a: Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? X YES M TIA B E NO b Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X 1E MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water Xbody? YES MAYBE NO e Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to Xtemperature , dissolved oxygen or turbidity. YES MAYBE NO-- fi Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO g ) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate , phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria , or other substances into the ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available Xforpublicwatersupplies? YES MAYBE kb— Explanation: 3 (b) Minor change due to roof and asphalt areas. 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a ) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? X YES MAYS€ NO t ) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? X Yid MAYBE Nb— c ) Introduction of new species, of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing X species? YrS- MAYBE NB c) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X YES MAYBE NU— Explanation: 4 (a) and (c1 New species introduced by landscaping. 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? X YES N -tr b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement X of fauna? V— MAYBE Nb d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X VET— MTTU N67 Explanation: 6) Noise: Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE WO— Explanation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X YEs— MAYBE A Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the Xpresentorplannedlanduseofanarea? YES MAYBE 0— Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X Y€s MBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X Try RIR NB Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) Xintheeventofanaccidentorupsetconditions? Y€T— MAYBE WU— Explanation: Diesel fuel oil is stored on site for fueling vehicles. A small quantity of fuel gases are stored remotely from main building; the fuel gases are filled at other locations and brought to the site. 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location. distri- bution. density. or growth rate of the human population of an area? MAYBE Explanation: T 1 044 5- 12) Housi . Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities. or demand for new parking? YES M YBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X 1 — M NZr" d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X YE MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne. rail or air traffic? X YES M YBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X V!T MAYBE iW Explanation: Slight increase due to deliveries to and from the site and due to personnel working at the site. (approximately a dozen people. ) 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon. or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? X VET— MAYBE NO b) Police protection? X YES- MlY NB c) Schools? X YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X YES MBE NO f) Other governmental services? X YES M- NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YES MAYBE 176— b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require Xthedevelopmentofnewsourcesofenergy? YES- MAYBE WU— Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? X YE MAYBE NO b) Communications systems?X YE NO c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES MAYB 6— e) Storm water drainage? Y S MATBE A- M Solid waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X Pam- FrATir W Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public , or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive X site open to public view? Y ME NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES- MAYBE N Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? TS MAYBE N Explanation: III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: s gne Kenneth D. Long name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON NOVEMBER 28 1978 , AT 9 :00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES , File R-217-78 , REZONE FROM G-9600 TO R-3 , HEARING EXAMINER RECON- SIDERATION OF APPLICATION ; property located on Lake Washington Blvd . N . E . between S . E . 76th and Lake Washington Blvd . N . E . 2 . BROWN/STRAND HOMES (WINDOW LANE ) , File PP-254-78 , APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF 14-LOT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION ; property located between N . E . 12th Street and N . E . 14th St . 3. AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS , INC . , File SA-258-78 , APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL IN M-P ZONE ; property located at S. W. 10th Street and Powell Ave . S . W . , Earlington Industrial Park . 4 . GARFIELD ASSOCIATES , LTD . , Files SP-253-78 and SA-252-78 , APPLICATIONS FOR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FILL AND GRADE IN M-P ZONE AND SITE APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF WAREHOUSE FACILITY IN M-P ZONE ; property located 300 feet west of East Valley Highway between S . W. 29th St . and S . W . 34th St . in Orillia Industrial Park . Legal descriptions of files noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 28 , 1978 AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED November 17 , 1978 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , STEVE MUNSON HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public , on the 15th day of November 1978 . SIGNED AUFA-AC.... 7,116‘044knq 4.-.. lf, „ -• A II' L. t e4?'','‘ MT 'itZ i;*'*41 t.,4 l'e-,,,q4 , :1, 4. 1.4411#4, 44 4 4 w ,'•:,:ii.r COPE441:1,:. . t.A.;,,, I g Ty GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED AT S.W. 10TH STREET AND POWELL AVE. S.W. , EARLINGTON INDUSTRIAL PARK. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT. I.S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF 4 ‘.. -0....--.. imi, 1/4 if- i ,- --, It prc.: ,, 1 i tn.-, - euPk i)NO.A It - ' I 't I% ' TO BE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING ON NOVEMBER 28, 1978 BEGINNING AT 9: 00 AM pow CONCERNING ITEM iVf I R E Zit NE i SPEC : . , PEvilkiiiT V71SITE AP * tik •V itt. L IN M-P ZONE 1 IttfikiViER 1 ,,',A•40- 3 E LINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REIVOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION OF RA, o THE CITY OF RENTON z y' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 ma CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 04 a 235- 2550 94, FD SEP E O P November 14 , 1978 Mr . John Desanto Air Products and Chemicals , Inc . P . 0. Box 538 Allentown , Pennsylvania 18105 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL IN M-P ZONE ; file SA-253-78 ; property located at S . W. 10th St . and Powell Ave . S. W. , Earlington Industrial Park Dear Plr . Desanto : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on November 3 1978 A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for November 28 , 1973 at 9 : 00 a . m. . Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y Ericksen Planninirector f 2 1//)/7/6--By lfV/C i aC David R . Clemens Associate Planner cc : Kenneth D. Long 100 Mercer St . Seattle , WA 98109 c ` , PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 28, 1978 APPLICANY : AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS , INC . (John Desanto) FILE NO : SA-258-78 A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site approval of a facility for the transfill of industrial gas from bulk liquid form to a gas form in an M-P Zone. There will not be any manufacturing at the site . B . GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : BURLINGTON NORTHERN , INC . 2 . Applicant : AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS , INC . John Desanto ) 3 . Location : S. W. corner of S . W. 10th Street and Powell Avenue S . W . 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5 . Size of Property : 3 acres 6 . Access :Via S . W. 10th Street and Powell Avenue S . W. 7 . Existing Zoning : M-P , Manufacturing Park 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : M-P , Manufacturing Park ; "0" , General Classification District . 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Manufacturing Park 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . C . PURPOSE OF REQUEST : To permit construction of the proposed facility in order to distribute the gas to retail distributors and to sell directly to customers . D . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by ordinance #1745 dated April 14, 1959 . The current M-P zoning was adopted by Ordinance 2337 on June 12 , 1967 . E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography : The site is essentially level . 2 . Soils : Urban land (Ur) . The erosion hazard is slight to moderate . No capability or woodland classification . 3 . Vegetation : The site consists principally of scrub grass and a few blackberry bushes . 4 . Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site may provide suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS , INC . (John Desanto ) , File No ; NOVEMBER 28 , 1978 SA-258- 78 PAGE TWO 5 . Water : No surface water was observed on the subject site . 6 . Land Use: The site itself is presently undeveloped . Adjacent properties are either existing or developing industrial park uses . F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The site is within the Earlington Industrial Park . G. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : A 12" water main extends north-south along Powell Avenue S . W. and a second 12" main runs east-west on S . W. 10th Street. A 24" sanitary sewer runs north-south on Powell Avenue S . W. and an 8" sewer extends east-west on S . W . 10th Street . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department in accordance with ordinance requirements . 3 . Transit: Metro Transit Route #240 and 161 operate along S. W. Grady Way within 500 feet to the south of the subject site . 4 ., Schools : Not applicable . 5 . Parks : Not applicable . H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-730 , Manufacturing Park . I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT : 1 . Green River Comprehensive Plan , June 1976. J . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL SYSTEMS : Minimal . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS : Not applicable . L . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a declaration of negative impact has been issued for the subject proposal . This declaration is further based on the provision of suitable landscaping , screening , and other development standards which reduce visual and other impacts of the development and are consistent with M-P zone standards and Comprehensive Plan objectives . M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : A site map is attached . N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS , INC . (John Desanto ) File No : NOVEMBER 28 , 1978 SA-258-78 PAGE THREE 0. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The proposed use is compatible with the Manufacturing Park land use designation of the Comprehensive Plan . 2 . The applicant proposes to construct a transfill facility for gases from a bulk liquid form to a gas form. The development consists of a main building containing approximately 2000 square feet of office space and 6900 square feet of transfill area . A separate 1900 square foot fuel gas dock is proposed . An exterior 1200 square foot area for liquid storage tanks is located adjacent to the main building . A small scale truck fueling station is proposed at the north end of the . paved ;truck access area . 3 . The parking requirements for this facility would be as follows : Office 2000 square feet = 10 spaces Transfill 6900 square feet = 7 spaces Fuel gas dock 1900 square feet = 2 spaces Exterior tank storage 1200 square feet = 1 space TOTAL : 20 spaces required , 25 provided 4 . ' The proposed gas distribution facility is consistent with the manufacturing park zone permitted use , setbacks , land- scaping , and other requirements . Additional landscapinghasbeenprovidedtoinsurecompatibilitywithfutureM-P uses in the area , and other performance standards . 5 . The proposed site plan and landscaping area is consistent with Comprehensive Plan objectives and the requirements of Resolution No . 1923 between the City of Renton and Soil Conservation Service (Comprehensive Plan , Green River Valley ,June , 1976 , valley and site objectives , pp . 5-8 ) . Because of the large expanses of asphalt , and the potentialforstorageoftrucksandtrailers , additional landscape buffering and screening fence have been provided around the periphery of the site and within the site interior . The tree screen of the exterior tank storage should be increased . By reducing the length of four parking spaces to 15 ' (compact stall length ) , screen tree planting canbeextendedintothisarea . 6 . Drainage plans must be coordinated with the EngineeringDivisionandshallbesubjecttofinalapprovalbythatdivision , with the provision of suitable on-site retention and oil /water separation facilities and connection of down- spouts to the system. 7 . Utility plans shall be coordinated with and approved by the Public Works and Fire Departments . 8 . The final concrete tilt-up building exterior treatment and color shall be compatible with M-P Ordinance and Comprehen- sive Plan objectives subject to Planning Department approval (Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan , objectives , June , 1976 ) . 9. A Flood Zone Control Permit is required for the subject site development . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS , INC . (John Desanto ) File No . NOVEMBER 28 , 1978 SA-258-78 PAGE FOUR 11 . Proposed height of the building is approximately 20 feet , which is consistent with the height requirements of the M-P zone . 12 . Sidewalks are required on S . W. 10th and Powell Avenue S . W. 13 . The applicant should note the comments of other divisions attached . P . PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION : Approval subject to the following conditions : 1 . Sidewalks shall be installed in accordance with full City standards and in accordance with Public Works Department approval . 2 . Final Planning Department approval of landscape , berming , and screening plans per 0 , Analysis , No ' s 5 and 9 . 3 . Provision of suitable on-site storm water retention and oil /water separation facilities per Public Works Department approval and ordinance requirements . 4 . Provision of suitable utilities per Public Works and Fire Departments ' approval . 5. Approval of a state Flood Zone Control Permit by King County Hydraulics Division and Department of Ecology . 6. Building exterior treatment and color shall be compatible with M-P Ordinance standards and Comprehensive Plan objec- tives per Planning Department approval . 7 . The site and landscaping plan shall be amended to provide tank storage area screening through the placement of trees at the front of four parking spaces which shall be designa- ted as "compact" spaces per Analysis No . 5. ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department V% ta 3QParkDepartmentIr.M gt6g10 ofice Departmentoi)(ef Public Works Department il-e.4,7z Q_, di'lding Div. Engineering Div . Traffic Engineering Div. Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee ) PAUIP eitAlf DATE : 1 /,' 1b PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: r R-E-Z0N-C MAJOR PLAT 14W /117Ign7.___ SITE APPROVAL 4440" !4i SHORT PLAT PECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE i1 1 /b REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :LADLIT Comments : 01/ S Q N t" . Fo a..t,/,o rcz o 17 c a F(-, t. sc:,-./C 2 j%cSt 6LE pnf- Sic ;- Ft Z 1-4Yo2,4n‘ Z (- Q Lira_n ALSOSO / L_ Cc./.IN a i!"i.)nv; n (-A rE2 s/S ar—t W i L L_ 2.s.= u(2c= a ur_co Pez.E.s.c,t L iL Lo 21 G'"tilTi o,' i 2,____I55 J II_ IS- l,8, Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : DC_,0 6_-_3 Comments : 6'7- .i• / ,C /..F"--s Cr- iey. O 16 G l.(/ G{/ -24-----z, Z- .1) ("4-4 ..----37Z-e-C-7-74— :13Z:1) -(-> .?--./-' / 1,----.. t,-, (Ge-a---f,7 J1/{-a C Ci bac L'-e_ , '?:"O ..,,21;7- .7/ 1 \ ;f v .,.'( G-f I( .:C;,< ; - ( A-4A e c+C.ee_-- a_Le ._--7.C.P7_- L1. L..,-N-L.7 C/jv:t---7 Signaturei'rector or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :l y / ,; Li c V 11"1 Comments : 7_,,,,___:77_,._:________<____s,—, (:)--,z....:,_,,r--2"--`,‘ Signature of Director or Authorized Represe tative Dat ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : O ' nance Department Fire Department Library Department F0j 19 O Park Department amowitki4PoliceDepartment8PublicWorksDepartment O Building Div. JEngineering Div. Traffic Engineering Div.1S:3 Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee )) Stit6'PA V IP l 1 DATE : I1 /4` J PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : t MAJOR PLAT 4i 21V1V(TL___ SITE APPROVAL 6474 ' f ` 6 SHORT PLAT PECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT J WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE Il 1 /b REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : f-/Arf, Comments : c--ta5 r ,ter<<ivi s/-/ /-'/-iv j S`//ol:-)i.vG Fife fieU'LC`77a/Li ACV/CC.S. 4ti /9/'i-/—/73/x..JCC.5 //cam ;//s /`ram' C < j ;. 2L` „L.", iic) f, - ,C2C-/i,.'ir Cti /``0.2 i//c/rc' / 9`c-S/7z 1tir3 U i--1/'-i6";t--i C K- S/ ( . er Cr-- (1. ----7 Signature of Director or Auth rite- --Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Pa k Department olice Department 46 10 Public Works Department 24- Zrij61001W4 ilding Div. Engineering Div . 0 Traffic Engineering Div. o Utilities EngineeH'ing Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) l7Au1c7 11 I4 1/7 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 44o-76 ; Application No . : A gr_le i8 Action Name : ottiR fVe170e.P017 % ' J I n g St iVt3tlte Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : 1i 4 16 Note : 2esponses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Approved Not Approveomments : / a n A) l' Lit-J. a) 0 . , ,ax 1; i 1 .a...e, .... ,..,• A.P.. j. c.A...t..n..0.. L..,, ,-) . .--..4 f • a- 3) j) r . -. t/- . ., ,--e-..-Q.( tK i....rr-n.r-c.,. •` ... .. . [ L,W-4 i/A//,'',' Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : UYIcJ ri Approved LlNot Approved Comments : 01 / SG FT Fort_ L.,/arG2 t Sa Fr Foa 1/-rjHCl cS_ II-- is-7g Signature off Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : De tment : ie c r ' >14 q l — Approved NJot Approve J Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department flt6 11) O Public 'ks Department 601h llrl Building Div. Engineering Div . O Traffic Engineering Div. O Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) gulp g Nxiit-A4 111/41/1) SUBJECT. : Review of ECF- 440--v6 ; Application No . :- 0015 Action Name : ,t IR 1C1 % 1Da 4 Nate Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : ii 0 lb Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : k\.) - Approved Eallot Approved Comments : 76 ,_i , ,7- _ezce, t,:,,,_,,i, ,.,..;I O c--6; - . / , ‘ i L ''' ( o ,,I) dCe / C- )C' d lc.. 2 c ( cc-(e Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date- ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : O F . nance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department f11,6PoliceDepartment O Public Works Department 44100N4 Building Div . Engineering Div. Q Traffic Engineering Div. 0 Utilities EngineeH'ing Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) l7Au(Q g aritftA4 i1 I41 SUBJEC •" : Review of ECF- 40--1gj ; Application No . : 2016 Action Name : d j ' &i IdIR Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : 1i el 16 Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : j/P/.1---- Lr Approve L_1Not Approved Comments : S i /------,7 :=. . S// -1Z./3ivS S'//o4.//c 6 //c /, 'o'7 C. 'T„:v JL Vi( _S /?A-O / 1/%` i.//1i1.., L S / j/f"S /"/jG'/l/7% ,o L f-2 'AJ i///c.:' .122-7!V---'/7 =A j %.:.i.0 //4.`//C' /7-'Z---:A2'e'e 571- /1tit=7 re,—/"--7::ti!S. r \_____ c__ ___ t ems 7 ., Signature of /Director or Authorize. 'epr- entative Date 1\ .I- t 1 1 1 1 ri..t:1 _,„_,!._:_.....i .:-.. IIU'.1111 -• HON---ifHlHl--- .ilY Milo - — -- ----- =`;_ I IS. v 1 f f.._a 1 s a e erDr /- V. 7fc .7uJ::c C C.tse.v 9. 01 31.oFSICE t CYLINDER 11/ I I. a G- S..t!er .*emsisuo.c. SLOG1 I i1 r 17 ri. .-',.. — i 2.FULL GAS DOCK 4-- J-c.J JJ'SI SCC 6.l' s. r 1 J1 rn t-s.7SC-A/i:tv `t a.TRACTOR FUELING J pSTATIONIaitw 4.HELIUM RAILCAR 1 r i t . f SCREENING x i i 1 RJ Q. s 4,e Q m Z p!Q SJS i1 r__ 9_c.Ji>.,s sc ts_. -- •--, I 1 o! A > J.1.Fs< SC2=a.1 1 H. rr(,'gs` -, •-?'--{r.'?r" 1 }a. . . w ' Lii l S rt#a I. c M4J. 6i,s t 1 t O C N' /ti'.1 iY .Y i f i zi--_2 s's_ 1'_.tS 2..Y Pooxrstl Arjv en{ge LW A . 4NA1 /wt titrA.%r IPPd oci- SITE PLAN .wiu Ii1- i o s r f h iJI ['v 1 i J UYto Q i II lle.•, - Alg., 4.. )\, Ck. s'\ *-, g k 1,' 4„, 4..„ I.(,iffzi.kz4 4i1,/1''''i'i.----- J 7 s 0I..,ttt,' G S ‹ Zy w U c., v5Er BLVD _ 1/ r pPP i,i,itw i,i W" Adea PAN t E S 4 Q h mu G W Q 6 o Z T R p t 0111010, 1 ics:Ili_ , _ T10 ' G1.0000,..af IIII A R wool!IUIIi l 5 A L II R1 fL_- IINI w d aA,ll!. l of 6 lb1fd%. , ,:NI IA : , 0 . r c.i, S Xpll 3 unl -let, i II, _ - oidul iIh Imo i n ak= 'I, # .n i / p• yt - ,, 11I1,II -1II ,I -in ,II1 /IIII,, li I lu 'a ylUi : I I IIU_ . _ uu - L eigi jC iLvu, 4 IC f - -,mr_ L..1 alitRR—l Li_r jW yl i it l 0 iWi06ii- -0 Irai"A 1.-' IIM , -'• " \ i..4 -.t y f- I -, - .141 I 4 q r .I I -1I N ,. I r:/ r--x- .'' ) G S\-1 40W t ai 4 I 1 i. 1 r19IM._7 rsu1 i 1I CIF I..EN FtY MEADER DO. TIOh CLAM . P s SITE APPROVAL : AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS , INC . APPL I CANT AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC.TOTAL AREA { 3 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via S.W. 10th Street and Powell Avenue S.W. EXISTING ZONING M-P, Manufacturing Park EXISTING USE Undeveloped PROP JSED USE Transfi l l facility for gases from a bulk liquid form to a gas form. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park COMMENTS ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : O Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department I[ to O Park Department a4114V1 olice DepartmentR/P Public Works Department lding Div . Engineering Div . OTraffic Engineering Div . O Utilities Engineering Div . FROM : Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) VAUIP _ elek DATE : P 14" 1b PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : R-E- UN-L MAJOR PLAT 4Vfg7tx SITE APPROVAL At '0,6-174i SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT Z, WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE I1 21 1CJ REVIEW B OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION T1) : 0 Finance Department r, 8 Fire Department WLibraryDepartmentVI 117 O Park Department amtlf0114 8 Police Department Public Works Department O Building Div . OEngineering Div . O T affic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM : Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee ) A_ /]PAOIP__ DATE : 11 /4` I& PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : f MAJOR PLAT 412 rU SITE APPROVAL 644 '0%5' !4i1/ SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE IP11/6 REVIEW EY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :U< LI Comments : 01 / 5Q Fr . FO a_isJ,87Z-it__ 0 ! 7 S a F r n_- 50-le 2 V°0CS t gLE OM- WC:- Fi 2C NY o2,er4 T5 (l_c:Q krrz.€i': i=rz SyST(="^ wIc._ tom/ C- ALSD ALA__ cor.p.iCc-aDivS LzF`(, n ,kiCiv7 ahf I— IS'- Zs/ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION 10 : O Finance Department Fire Department8LibraryDepartmentFI( 1 O Park Department WIlk/61 8 Police Department Public Works Department O Building Div . 151r) psineering Div . Traffic Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FRO`l : Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) rVALh1t7iL ,DATE : I1 /4" /g PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : f MAJOR PLAT 4/Z A#7/2x1-4 SITE APPROVAL 4704 -0,Mr:Ti—j SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE Il 21 /6 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :y "D I 1c E` / k-2e- e v- I 7 Comments : C7-21 a'7‹, Signature of Director or Authorized Represeative Dat ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : O Finance Department Fire Department8LibraryDepartmentFi[% i°/ O Park Department 6\4114V10 8 Police Department Public rks Department Building Div. OEngineering Div . 8 Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) pAV112g !LA4 DATE : I1 W /b PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : RE-Z9it E MAJOR PLAT ittg SITE APPROVAL 441W-17i7-7 SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT Jjj, WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE II 21 /lJ REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : J_ c.:O ,, Comments : le-/7,c 6 6---Lc, t -)e :;1' zt( Z- ,l/ 6-d y 7z.„f,-- :8 eI C L C li L./7 h,,. ci i,,,,,, ,,,_ „ --,__, c .,,,z,,,,/- .,-, , % , , „ ..,,-( t (. 6/ - t A 2-,e 04— a_te ..-- ----6.ii- i 2,5'1 ,--L ,,,, ? ---- 4,7. : fr y Signature o -- erector or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : 0 'nance Department A. Fire Department Library Department NW O Park Department Ia4 WItj4 Police Department Public Works Department O Building Div. OEngineering Div. 8 Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM : Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) flAi I J2 g elektof DATE : II 1A /b PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: REt&NEMAJOR PLAT 4 At '0,16'174i1"—/SITE APPROVALSHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT j WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE 11 2/ Tb REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ,/J1(r Comments : u5— / c- ii/, ;( /S%/ /ate. -/L'J s/7/O4;J i',t/ -. /7i/c G L c-ily4 C(1/CGS /1/v J /-)//'/7)6'6'-i /`_a/2 //S fw '!C / ? j u KEG .(.. -,..i/J f/`_ ,OC/%9/'i—/ .cam-i i02 77/z f/c' / / G1 S/7 z /9 A, 1)( 1 K-- (/ (_i z- 0-- 3--Ag Signature of Director or Auth rf d—Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : Q Finance Department ill Fire Department Library Department Park Department VW/olice Department Public Works Departmen0`'0 10611krAW4 ilding Div . Engineering Div . OTraffic Engineering Div . Q Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) VAu1Q g ariiiiti II(1411 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 4-10-1E ; Application No . :- ',, - 2 ,6 78 JActionName : 1R l-pt/c2 '• Ids f quwcue Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : 40 lb Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Y , Approved Not ApproveComments : J .:<. (/r.J 4.' eL/ ', vu. 5-''`.- S GJ /V V4 t' 0--- O-f..l-e-U 17..2,-e c•,1,J, a) s D.f. /,.1,.e,a.l.'2 Ii..'l,{T``. /.P i t t v_ rj i.., 2 ' . „ , e-, ,:t, -.,/, ii-e. (._.e,--..,..„._41..,:-,./( ---c;/ - ... 1/4/fir.. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : O Finance Department 11 Fire Department Library Department Park Department 414PoliceDepartment O Public Works Department tk41 WWI N6 8 Building Div . Engineering Div . Q affic Engineering Div . Utilities EngineeY"ing Div . FROM : Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) Wit2 g ariti6 1114115 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 440--7gj ; Application No . : 20 15 Action Name : AIR p(fem? .. NIki Iola f qui4w Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : 4 'u lb Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : i1Tic T' Rf Approved i`tNot Approved Comments : vl // "Sc Er w2 /97,rcsiz_ ot / mac. E"t Fi.v2. sJ,JtE:iz_- 1 i J \ I 1 It-- /5-7k Signature oy'f Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: O Finance Department Fire Department ill Library Department Park Department flt6PoliceDepartment 10 O Public 'ks Department V%I Nt Building Div. Engineering Div. O Traffic Engineering Div. Q Utilities EngineeY.ing Div. FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) 4u(Q g Ottliki 11 14116 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 44Q-46 ; Application No . : .34 2ypj 115 Action Name : A/12 f ptf2 41 1dt 4 fL1JtL,- Please review the attached. Review requested by (date ) : 11 el [6 Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : j( 0, 6--- Approved 1Not Approved Comments : e9::"07- - 'Z- ecu,„:„ ______e_,:, o e ,i.,„,,,,- 2 , , , / c, ,,, ,,,,,,e e 74 St VC, ..Vij,, C. -L r ( cc <<;-2 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : O Finance Department Fire Department 11 Library Department Park Department filel,Police Department lq) 0 Public Works Department t011ireVelg4 8Building Div . E ineering Div. Traffic Engineering Div . O Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) IQ g Otritit 111141117 SUBJEC'" : Review of ECF- 4 0-16 ; Application No . : t ik e% -V Action Name : 1k[12 prep(fc/'47 '. _A, jot 4 f2fwate Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : 4 01b Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW B1 OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : fDetment : 7` ,1/ e- LZ(/at CCr1 LiNotproved Approve. J J Comments : 1,,, p -a-c-_+---IV 0 3 I 5 LI , 6 c Z .,____-f c. e- l e ._._ L``_,/-/ 1 C--),9 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS i// TO: O Fnance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department t Police Department 41 Public Works Department 106 1 ikr/el Ar4 Building Div .18 Engineering Div . O Traffic Engineering Div. Q Utilities Enginee'hing Div . FROM : Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) PAUV g aritit II 1 ittlit' SUBJEC1 : Review of ECF- 410-16 ; Application No . : &)4 - 20 16 Action Name :— 19PAPPOCM7 % t9AJ 1 ti 4 qt,J4w Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : iI 0 `b Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : %,/-- 17- ApprovedNot Approved Comments : 4eS " i=,.s c.:4 ' S// #Pz/,/'—' ,S'i./d // 'C' /,--/cc= /pi2a cz7an, ix V iccc.S r -0 /9/1-2,,/a.. le..--S Cdre jifiS / G'/G/"% o C-L AJ F//CC L /'/Veir/c c..i ,'04: i/4`//e i 7'‘‘-J c /IA./J j 0 e —v Xs---/-7 ' Signature of Director or Authorized epr entative Date f, 1161110 BURLINGTON NORTHERN Lobby 2 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND Central Building 8104PROPERTYMANAGEMENTDEPARTMENTTelephoneee,W (206) 62on -6682206) 625-6682 Mr. Gordon Ericksen November 17, 1978PlanningDirector City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue So. Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Ericksen: We are negotiating sale of Lot #1 of Earlington Industrial Park #2accordingtoplatthereofrecordedinVolume88ofPlat, Page 80,located in City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, excepting the north 1036.6 feet thereof and except the east 14 feetthereof, being indicated in red on attached print, to Air ProductsandChemicals, Inc. We have been advised that public hearing for approval of site planswillbeheldthelastTuesdayofNovember, 1978; and affidavitconfirmingcurrentownershipofthepropertyisrequired. For yourreference, attached hereto is affidavit executed on our behalf withexhibitprintofpropertyattachedthereto. Very truly yours, C. Kretzew Asst. Manager - Property Management Att. File: RE-1894 - Renton, WA OF RED RECEIVED 40V 201978 GDEPP AFFIDAVIT I, J. J. Gordon being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 17th day of November 1978 , Notary Public in and for the State of rWashington, residing at / f,iu/A/G44d. BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC. yC./ Bye Manager - am of Notar ublic) Si ure of Owner) Property Mgmt. Lobby 2, Central Building a/ 2/ 7 e / // Seattle, WA 98104 Address)Address) Seattle, Washington City) State) 625-6682 Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by meandhasbeenfoundtobe_ Jorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rul Ty Fations of the Renton Planning Department governing the fil t of lication. dillieb' Y. C;\ Date Received 1 2A1 9 By: t.... ----.....„..........,.. it] G DEPpQi Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 i •I 1 [ 1 220.01• 1 sr) • I 3. I T CI 1 II 1 O 1 I V I 7) . ^ , el me w Q li I I; 2 j d I 01' • 1 r. Q h 4 1 O i I i _ o 1111/I IJ N r. isE • I1. I1 ' y y h C r y y M 74. fp ' I A, a 1sC!) N_8 4, 4 5 w ---- - -- i .4 ----- --- y y r' x1 b 5 t 9 8 L: J 7?k, Imo. n 5 elas+r+9 M1„ *. 1 f `+ t A ZIT C 1 ( s7alntC.i!`_. 4... O r ' l 1 p Jam. 6v A hiblt Ax, .v- Ztny L Foa;a a ELINIC-TOq Tt.1D. c-4:,Rt:, SCALE.• I " = Ids 8 - t5. 78 17 y THE CITY OF RENTON A oak c MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 0. 0 •" CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0441, 235-255O E0 cFp E September 5 1978 J . DeSanto Industrial Gas Division fir Products and Chemicals Inc P . O. Box 538 Allentown , Pennsylvania 18105 Dear Fir. DeSanto: tie have completed the preliminary review of your plan for yourdistributionfacility. The plan was routed to other depart- ments for comment in addition to our own , and their comments are attached . Particular attention should be given to those made by the Fire Department. The proposed plan generally conforms to the zoning and compre- hensive plan requirements for the site ; however , the followingitemswerenoted : 1 . A minimum ten foot ( 10 ' ) landscape setback is required along all street property lines (Ordinance) . You may wish to change your employee parking to a 90° type 9 ' by 20 ' stall with 24 ' aisle ) . 2 . Screen planting and fencing along the perimeter of the exterior yard area ( Comprehensive Plan ) . 3. Landscape treatment at key points to complement the buildino design . Mounding and screening should be con- sideredvalso (Comprehensive Plan ) . 4 . Parking should be revised to reflect 25 spaces . For your convenience , a marked-up copy of your proposed planisenclosed . This plan incorporates the above four items . It is hoped that these comments will assist you in preparingfinalizedplansforsiteplanapprovalbytheHearingExaminer. See attached application instructions . ) If we may be of assistance , please feel free to contact this department at your earliest convenience . Very truly yours , ord n Y . Erl k n Pla ing firer D id R . emens Associate Planner DRC : jb Attachments I Aofe6xe to /140 5 R .' rh , I t' t 11 _ i' yam . .. C L` i` 1 y ' _ l --“- 1 tea..„cJ= Z5 Poe., ML 44eQr 4 3G Acees• r,-D MGG.P.,c,As. 434 . Nr Rr _ o _! w- 5...'91r I101n+(%Vrst{Tl: It : ate*C i • IT(7`,fi."-A 4.•N6•*c oFc IeE 1720"F 4'ol2f••1 -i gj" o' "A j • i7 1L..Rw.,r- 61Sn sF• 5 .a- 9 is MMI RAi' c,a.wupX ti, r. csALL(vas tovC.Y.-tq=6r H•1.v - LL.. 4 fie.r;oe sJ.ii:fK tit, 1. • 4p 1c... itil f3w j? - t. TOI' —1044:w5i. .GC'r. Ii_et i t z -.h;;,/ QF RE/yTO ram. ZtGW SP Pk_A.ti ti't tG PAWL ' I, L`SA Ta 1 ' 4 tiLi ifs MEMORANDUM August 24, 1978 TO: Michael Smith, Senior Planner FROM: Fire Preventin Bureau SUBJECT: Proposed plot plan — Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. The proposed Air Products and Chemical facility located at SW 10th and Powell Ave. SW must meet the following fire department requirements: 1. Fire flow of 2,250 gallons per minute. 2. Certification that this facility meets Uniform Fire Code, NFPA codes and A.G.A. codes. 3. Emergency access for fire department equipment from north of property and from Powell Ave. SW to rear of facility. 4. One fire hydrant located on emergency access. 5. Listr-requi d of all chemicals and gases, amounts and locations. E.V. Wooton, Fire Inspe for EVW:pr icon -6 AuG ,241978 es. DEP IItWIL '^`/,__ 1_A0, /C.-.,..'3_. //i ,/..l ///J./ ,• /L 1iL U.D.L. I,LNJJ UI tSUILU ADDRESS 5.4.2, /e) 71' 7 ) /3 iZZIC.E GL /)„r ,S 4. 1 . FIRE MANAGEMENT AREA... 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE) : I - II IV III ,, -' V FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY) WOOD FRAME MIXED Note: If "Mixed" , see Special Instructions for Area and Basic Fire Flow) 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: e sp p ft2 NUMBER OF STORIES:. x TOTAL BUILDING AREA: R> 5p-4) .ft21 4 . DI II I;MINI BA',Ic Ind II UW I PUM IA01 1 ill , I %1110 iU I /1 (A) : 7S0 GPM ( 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: - 4' 3 P GPM If low Hazard, Subtract up to 25% of (B) ; If High Hazard, Add up to 25% of (8) . 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C) :8 8 GPM If B+C is less than 500 GPM, insert 500 GPM) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT:ADJUSTMENT: 0' GPM If completely sprinklered, subtract up to 50Z of (D) ; If light hazard occupancy andfireresistiveornon-combustible construction, subtract up to 75% of (D). ) 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: Using the table at left as a guide, enter the separation and adjustment for each of the "four faces" of the building in the table at the right: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJUSTMENT • 0 - 10 25% max. North 11 - 30 20% max. East Add 31 - 60 15% ivax. South Add t61 - 100 10;:, max. West Add101 - 150 5 max. Total % of Adjustment 150 or 4-hr wall O' ' max. not to exceed 75%) : a % Total % adjustment times (D) ) ADJUSTMENT: GPM (I 9. DETERMINE ROOF COVERING ADJUSTMENT: If wood shingle roof covering, add 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: _Pi/GPM (( 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: If D+E+F+G is less than 500 GPM, insert 500 GPM. ) If D+E+F+G is greater than 12,000 GPM, insert 12,000 GPM. ) D+E+F+G),REQUIRED FIRE FLOW:L_ SG _ GPM (1 11 . SIGNED: 1. ;.__ c_--- ____. /DATE: k/ 4 pF R4 4.• o , 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTU02 i' BUILDING DIVISION 235-2540Ama0ch MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 A O, Q4Tf0 SEPItw August 22, 1978 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI i MAYOR 7 O it 4/1\. c. PfriEhIED C. t ikUG 22 +978 1 lTO: Planning Department 4.._ , FROM: Jim Hanson, Building Division 4./ D R/ mod SUBJECT: Air Products and Chemicals Distribution Facility - Earlington Industrial Park The proposed distribution facility will have to meet the Uniform Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code for this type of use. We are unable to determine if the buildings as proposed can legally be constructed without further information about type, amounts and exact use of each chemical. The buildings may have to be separated by walls or protected by automatic sprinklers. JCH/mp pF RL,AV r1 c THE CITY OF RENTON z y MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055o c:' CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENTPoco 0 4, 235- 2550 440 SE P- MEMORANDUM August 22 , 1978 TO : Building Division Fire Department FROM : Michael Smith , Senior Planner RE : PROPOSED USE , EARLINGTON INDUSTRIAL PARK Attached for your review and comment are preliminaryplansandwrittendescriptionforaproposedAirProductsandChemicalsDistributionFacility . 1LS :wr Attachments r. ate/Ntlea4- INC. INDUSTRIAL GAS DIVISION P. O.BOX 538 ALLENTOWN,PA.18105 TELEPHONE 215-398-4911 31 July 1978 Mr. Gordon Y. Ericksen i V 3 1918 Planning Director G t_ City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Y y4'Renton, WA 98055 NG DES Dear Mr. Ericksen: As you may recall , Mr. Dino Piccini and I met with you on 7 June 1978 to discuss the suitability of the Earlington (No. 2) Industrial Park for the proposed Air Products and Chemicals facility. As you suggestedatthattime, a descriptive summary of the proposed operation would allow a preliminary review by the Planning Department and thus a pre-liminary approval for Air Products to pursue land acquisition and formal planning approvals. This, of course, is the purpose of thisletter. The site we are reviewing is the corner property located at Powell Avenue and Tenth Street, immediately south of Perry Brothers, The park iszoned "M-P" , Manufacturing Park District and accordingly we have obtainedChapter7 (Zoning) and have incorporated into our preliminary layoutthevariousrequirementsmentionedtherein. The proposed plot plan (SK #3513 B, Rev. 2) , 3 copies of which are included, can be referred to in this description, As you can see, the 3 acre site contains an 8500 sf office and cylinder fill building,a 1900 sf fuel gas dock, an employee and visitor parking lot, rail siding, tank storage area and paved truck areas, An attempt to show landscaping, screening and other features has been made for our internal purposes and, of course, formal landscaping and screening drawings willbesubmittedattheappropriatetime (see attached artist's drawingofsimilartypefacilityinCalifornia) . The facility will house the Renton offices of Air Products and Chemicals which will be responsible for sales, transfilling and distribution of industrial gases in the Seattle-Tacoma area. The office portion, con- sisting of 1920 sf will house about 5 employees. The cylinder filling operation will necessitate about 3 employees and 2 drivers. There will be no manufacturing on-site as all the products handled will be delivered in liquid form from other manufacturing plants. The products stored tp) Mr. Gordon Y. Ericksen 2-31 July 1978 on-site in liquid form shall include oxygen, nitrogen, argon, helium andcarbondioxide. The other gaseous products stored on-site such asacetylene, hydrogen and specialty gases will be filled elsewhere andbroughttoRentonforre-distribution. With regard to possible futureexpansion, consideration must be given to increasing the size of bothstructuresby50% and adding one additional liquid storage tank forhydrogenwhichwouldbelocatedtosatisfyallNFPAandFireDepartmentrequirements. In the way of truck traffic, we would anticipate approximately 10 trailersadaymovingthroughthefacilitywithaminimalamountofrailtraffic, The building structure would be conventional construction using masonrywithabrickorstoneveneer. We understand that pre-engineered steelbuildingsmaynotbeacceptedandthattilt-up construction may not beeconomicalfortheintendedstructure. If your review indicates that our operation would be acceptable inEarlingtonIndustrialPark, we would then proceed to acquire the propertyandergageanarchitecttoprepareformallayouts/elevations for yourrevieti,. We do request a written reply to this letter so that we caninitiatetheappropriateactionswithregardtolandacquisition, YoucancallmecollectatA/C 215, 398-8158 (after 7 August) if any questionsarise, or I am available to meet with you if that would be appropriateatthistime. Yours truly, 5.1, 14.1i— DeSanto Asst. Proj . Manager JDS/mar Enclosures cc: K. A. Eaton D. S. Piccini J. B. Reinoehl ENDING OF FILE FILE TITLE ww" ' if 2587e