HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA79-322BEipJpJI1sk3
OF FILE
FILE TITLE riIcRoFILMEii
ove2,4
3 g 79
Pr
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
State of Washington)
County of King
Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon
oath disposes and states:
That on the 9th day of April 19 79 , affiant
deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope
containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid,
addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled
application or petition.
12
c?)/7-"X 4-
Subscribed and sworn this \ - day of Nvf,\
19 "1L\ .
Notary Public in and for the State
of Washington, residing at Renton
Application, Petition or Case: Holmes Electric; SA-322-79
The minutes contain a £iat o6 the paAtLe,1 necond)
OF !
4s. iv
o THE CITY OF RENTON
v f 2
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055
o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
co' L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593
0,
9grE0 SERI°
P
April 24, 1979
Mr. Eugene M. Richards
P.O. Box 158
Renton, WA 98055
RE: File No. SA-322-79; Holmes Electric Company.
Dear Mr. Richards:
This is to notify you that the Examiner's Report and Recommendation,
dated April 9, 1979, regarding the referenced application, has not
been appealed within the time period established by ordinance.
Therefore, this application is considered final and is being
submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent
filing.
Sincerely,
L. Rick Beeler
Hearing Examiner
cc: Planning Department
City Clerk
April 9, 1979
OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT ANE RECOMMENDATION.
APPLICANT: Holmes Electric FILE NO. SA-322-79
LOCATION: Vicinity of 1500 Raymond Avenue S.W.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests site approval for development of an 18,900 +
warehouse/office facility in an M-P zone.
SUMMARY OF A:TION: Planning Department: Approval with conditions.
Hearing Examiner: Approval with conditions.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the
REPORT: Examiner on March 29, 1979.
PUBLIC HEARIVG: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining
available information on file with the application, and field
checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner
conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows:
The hearing 4as opened on April 3, 1979 at 9:30 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Renton Municipal Building.
Parties wishing tc testify were affirmed by the Examiner.
It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the
Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1.
David Clemens, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following
additional e<hibits into the record:
Exhibit #2: Site Plan as submitted
Exhibit #3: Elevation Plans as submitted
Exhibit #4: Site Plan with staff comments
The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was:
Eugene M. Richards
P.O. Box 158
Renton, WA 98055
Mr. Richards requested clarification regarding certain comments contained within the
report. Referencing Fire Department comments attached to Exhibit #1 which state that
emergency access for emergency equipment is required between the existing and new
building, Mr. Richards indicated that due to the need for security fencing in the south-
east corner of the site to protect company trucks, accessibility to a proposed fire hydrant
in that location would be hampered. Mr. Clemens indicated his assumption that in the event
of an emergency, gate locks would be severed. Referring to staff comments contained in
Exhibit #4 which indicate that fencing or landscaping should be installed at the southwest
corner of the site, Mr. Richards stated his preference for landscaping which would be more
aesthetic in appearance than fencing.
Mr. Richards indicated his desire to deed a portion of the property owned by the applicant
to the east of the subject site to improve circulation and provide equipment storage area
as a result of current business expansion. He also questioned a recommendation contained
in Section M.3 of Exhibit #1 which requires approval of plans for storm drainage by the
Public Works Department, and inquired regarding the possibility of elimination of this
requirement upon implementation of the Green River Watershed project in the area. Mr.
Clemens felt that requirements of the drainage ordinance would require on-site detention
facilities regardless of whether or not final improvements to storm drainage in the Green
River Valley area are completed.
Referencing Section L.10, which states requirements by the Engineering Division for off-
site improvements consisting of curb, gutter, sidewalk, storm drainage, street lighting
and paving on Raymond Avenue S.W. , Mr. Richards requested elimination of the sidewalk
requirement and suggested installation of planter areas and a rock path. He advised
that because the site is located on a dead-end street, the Austin Company located within
r
SA-322-79 Page Two
the icinity has a parking area contained on-site, and no pedestrian traffic exists in
the .rea, provision of sidewalks would be of no benefit to the public. He requested that
land caping plans not be required until after construction of the building, due to
diff culty in visualizing the completed project.
Mr. lemens indicated the assumption of the Planning Department that Fire Department
comments relating to provision of emergency access between the existing and proposed
buil ing were for the purpose of ensuring adequate access for purposes of emergency.
Mr. ichards indicated his objection to revising existing L-1 zoning on the eastern
prop rty in order to meet Fire Department requirements for circulation purposes if a
port on is subsequently deeded to the subject site, because a requirement may be imposed
for installation of sidewalks on that site and all requirements for landscaping and
surfacing had been accomplished at the time of prior approval.
The xaminer requested testimony in support or opposition to the request. There was no
respcbnse. He referenced Section 4-730.030.6 of the M-P zoning regulations which indicates
the requirement of 10 feet of landscape buffer along property lines abutting residential
properties, noting that residences exist to the north and south of the subject site.
The Examiner advised that the requirement would necessitate revision to the site plan
or application for a variance through the Board of Adjustment.
The Examiner referenced Section L.6 of Exhibit #1 which relates to requirement for
proposed development to conform to and be consistent with the approved site plan adjacent
to the east of the subject site, and inquired if such conformance exists. Mr. Clemens
indicated that details contained in Exhibit #4 are consistent with the existing site
layout. The Examiner inquired if revision to the existing Holmes Electric site located
easterly from the proposal would be required in order to accommodate proposed circulation
plans,. Mr. Clemens indicated that no revision would be necessary, and subject to removal
of an existing fence, the new area and old area would function separately.
The F'xaminer inquired if staff will be able to review and approve the landscape plan for
the entire site in the event application for a variance does not occur or is not granted
by the Board of Adjustment. Mr. Clemens advised that if the landscape buffer required
to separate the site from residential areas is not approved by the board, the entire site
plan May possibly require additional review because the reduction of 20 feet from the
site May necessitate revision of parking areas of reduction of building size.
The Examiner requested a final recommendation from Planning Department staff. Mr. Clemens
added a recommendation that conformance to Section 4-730.030.6 of the M-P zoning
requirements relating to separation between residential and M-P zone occur,. or that a
variance be approved by the Board of Adjustment to deviate from the requirements.
The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No.
SA-322-79 was closed by the Examiner at 10:00 a.m.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner
now makes and enters the following:
FINDIGS:
1. T e request is for approval of a site plan for an 18,900 square foot warehouse and
o fice building on 48,000 square feet of M-P zoned property.
2. T e Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies
a d provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter,
a d is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as
s-t forth in full therein.
3. P rsuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental
Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance
h. s been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, repsonsible official
ee Exhibit #1) .
4. P .ans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the
impact of this development.
5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed.
6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity.
7. The proposal is compatible with the requirements of Section 4-730 (M-P) of Title IV,
Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances; exce ,t for the 10-foot landscaping
requirements along the north and south property lines (Section 4-730.030.6) . Abutting
properties on the north and south of the site are currently zoned G-6000 (Single
SA-322-79 Page Three
Family Residential) .
8. The proposal conforms to the Parking and Loading Ordinance requirements. Chapter 22,
except for the five-foot landscaping or fencing requirement along the southwestern
portion of the property (Section 4-2204.8.B. (1) ) . It was stated by the applicant
that the required landscaping can be provided in this area.
9. Exhibit #2 shows a portion of the site plan to include Lot 31, directly south of the
existing Holmes Electric facility, containing some of the parking and access for the
proposal. The legal description contained in the file of record does not specify
this lot. Access is also proposed at the westerly portions of Lots 32 and 33 (not
in the application) . Lots 31, 32 and 33 are zoned L-1, thereby not requiring site
plan review by the Examiner.
10. Landscape plans were not submitted. Staff testified that sufficient area had been
designated on Exhibit #2 to meet the requirements for wildlife habitat mitigation in
the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan and Resolution No. 1923. Staff expressed
confidence in its ability to review and approve a final landscape plan for conformance
with landscaping and screening requirements of applicable city ordinances and
regulations. This was acceptable to the applicant.
11. Off-site improvements are required along Raymond Avenue S.W. and possibly a portion
of Lot 31 along Seneca Avenue S.W. per Ordinance No. 3124. This ordinance is
administered by the Building Division and not within the Examiner's purview.
12. A storm Rater drainage plan has not been approved.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The propasal generally conforms to the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan and
zoning regulations except for landscaping and screening along the north and south
property lines. Lacking a landscaping plan, the Examiner experiences difficulty
in evaluating compliance with the wildlife mitigation measures and landscaping
requirements. Based upon the testimony of staff it appears that sufficient review
of the landscape plan can occur subsequent to the public hearing and in compliance
with the Examiner's decision.
2. It is evident in the submitted site plan, Exhibit #2, that to conform to the zoning
regulations 10 feet of landscape screening must be added along the northerly and
southerly property lines. This requirement is responsive to the single family zoning
of adjacent properties. Fundamental in land use principles is the need for this
screening to buffer the less intense single family land uses from the more intensive
manufacturing park land uses. On the site plan this means at least a 10-foot
landscape strip along the north and south property lines. Until the zoning on the
adjacent single family zoned parcels changes to something compatible with M-P
zoning, this landscape screen/buffer should exist. Furthermore, due to the wide
disparity of intensity between these land uses, the landscape screen should be
approved by staff to form an effective sight screen of sufficiently dense landscape
material that is predominantly evergreen in nature.
3. Very evident is the need for circulation around the proposed building and onto the
adjacent property of Holmes Electric (Lots 31, 32 and 33) . The Examiner's approval
of this additional access and the access over Lots 31, 32 and 33 is complicated by
the fact that these lots of the existing Holmes Electric property are not a part of
the application. It was stated by the applicant that some of this property could be
dedicated to the proposal, but this has not been accomplished. Since these lots are
zoned L-L, which does not require Hearing Examiner review, it appears reasonable that
staff cal adequately review and approve the site plan for these lots.
4. Roof-top mechanical equipment was not shown on the proposed building elevations,
Exhibit #3. Any such equipment must conform to the Green River Valley Comprehensive
Plan relative to visual impact upon adjacent and upland properties. Staff should
adequately be able to review these design details for conformance with the plan
goals and objectives.
DECISION:
Approval of Exhibit #2 subject to:
1. Corrections per Exhibit #4, including vehicular circulation per review and approval
of the Planning Department.
2. Addition of 10 feet of landscape screening along the northerly and southerly property
lines per review and approval of the Planning Department so as to form an effective
sight screen of predominantly evergreen plant material.
SA-322-79 Page Four
3. R view and approval by the Planning Department of roof-top mechanical equipment design
a d screening to conform to the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan.
4. Review of the final landscape plan by the Planning Department for compliance with
the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, Resolution No. 1923 and other applicable
ordinances and resolutions.
Normally, nothing in this decision should be construed to prejudice or be intended to
influ nce any decision the Board of Adjustment may be asked to make relative to this
devel pment. However, in this instance, it is imperative that consideration be given
to tr nsition between the M-P uses and adjacent single family land uses in order to
accom lish appropriate transition. Therefore, the Examiner's conclusion relative to
lands aping along the northerly and southerly property lines was viewed less as a
requi ement of the zoning regulations but more as necessary to accomplish this needed
trans tion and buffering of incompatible uses. Upon zoning changes on the abutting
properties, the import of transition is reduced and should be appropriately considered
at tht time.
ORDERED THIS 9th day of April, 1979.
e04.44004114-
1...,„_ _ illgiVatmli
L. •ick Beeler
Land Use Hearing Examiner
T SMITTED THIS 9th day of April, 1979, by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties
o record:
Eugene M. Richards, P.O. Box 158, Renton, WA 98055
T SMITTED THIS 9th day of April, 1979 to the following:tN Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director
Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
Ron Nelson, Building Division
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must
be filled in writing on or before April 23, 1979. Any aggrieved person feeling that the
decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error
in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available
at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen
14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the
specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the `
record, take further action as he deems proper.
An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires
that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and
meetin other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for
inspec ion in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased
at cos in said department.
RECEIVED
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
HEARING EXAMINER
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER T R 31979
AM F
PUBLIC HEARING 7,819,100111211121314151
APRIL 3 , 1979
APPLICANT : HOLMES ELECTRIC
EXHIBITHIBIT NO. f
FILE NUMBER : SA-322-79
ITEM NO. z . q
A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST :
The applicant requests site approval for development of an
18 ,900± warehouse/office facility in an M-P zone . ( Site develop-
ment map attached . )
B . GENERAL INFORMATION :
1 . Owner of Record : EUGENE M. RICHARDS
2 . Applicant : HOLMES ELECTRIC
3 . Location :Vicinity of 1500 Raymond
Vicinity Map attached) Avenue S . W .
4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description
is available on file in the
Renton Planning Department.
5 . Size of Property : 48 ,000 square feet .
6 . Access : Via Raymond Avenue S .W .
7 . Existing Zoning : M-P , Manufacturing Park .
8. Existing Zoning in the Area : M-P , Manufacturing Park ; L- 1 ,
Light Industrial ; G , General
Classification District ; G-6000 ,
Residential Single Family .
9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Manufacturing Park .
10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in
writing of the hearing date .
Notice was properly published
in the Record Chronicle on
March 23 , 1979 , and posted
in three places on or near the
site as required by City ordi -
nance on March 22 , 1979 .
C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND :
The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 1745 on
April 14 , 1959 . The property was rezoned from " G" to "M-P" by
Ordinance 3210 on April 7 , 1978.
D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND :
1 . Topography : The site is relatively level . Approximately
one-fifth of the site to the north consists of fill material
three to four feet deep.
2 . Soils : Urban Land ( Ur) . The erosion hazard is slight to
moderate . No capability or woodland classification .
3. Vegetation : The westerly portion of the property contains
some deciduous and evergreen trees while the remainder of
the site consists principally of scrub grass .
4 . Wildlife : Existing vegetation provides some habitat for
birds and small mammals .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
HOLMES ELECTRIC , SA-322-79
APRIL 3 , 1979
PAGE TWO
5 . Water: No standing water was evidenced on the subject site .
6 . Land Use : The subject site is presently undeveloped .
E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS :
The general area is in a transitional state from undeveloped and
single family residence property to commercial and industrial
uses .
F. PUBLIC SERVICES :
1 . Water and Sewer : An existing twelve ( 12) inch water main
runs along S . W . 16th Street. Nearest sanitary sewer is a
twenty-four ( 24) inch line that runs along S . W. 16th Street
and terminates at S . W . 16th Street and Raymond Avenue S .W.
2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department
as per ordinance requirements .
3 . Transit : Metro Transit Routes 240 and 161 operate along
S .W . Grady Way within 800 feet to the north of the subject
site .
4. Schools : Not applicable.
5 . Recreation : Not applicable .
G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE :
1 . Section 4-712 , Light Industry District .
2 . Section 4-728 , "G, " General Classification District .
3 . Section 4-730 , Manufacturing Park.
H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS :
1 . Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan , June, 1976 , Objectives ,
pages 5 - 7 .
2 . Resolution 1923 relating to City adoption of Soil Conservation
Service requirements for landscaping and wildlife habitat .
3 . Comprehensive Plan , Land Use Report , 1965 , Objectives , pages
17 - 18 .
I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT :
1 . Natural Systems : Development of the subject site will disturb
soil and vegetation , increase storm water runoff, and have an
effect on traffic and noise levels in the area . However ,
through proper development controls and procedures , these
impacts can be mitigated.
2 . Population/Employment : The nature of the use is such that
there isn ' t likely to be any significant change in population .
However, completion of the facilities will provide approxi -
mately 23 additional employment opportunities ( 1 . 2 employees/
1 ,000 square feet) .
3 . Schools : Not applicable.
4 . Social : Not applicable .
5 . Traffic : The proposed warehouse/office facility will generate
approximately 450 additional vehicle trips per day for the
warehouseing use ( 3 . 68 trips per 1 ,000 square feet plus 374
trips ) on Raymond Avenue S .W.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
HOLMES ELECTRIC , SA-322-79
APRIL 3 , 1979
PAGE THREE
J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION :
Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the
State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C ,
a declaration of negative impact has been issued for the subject
proposal . This declaration is further based on the provision of
suitable landscaping , screening , and other development standards
which reduce visual and other impacts of the development and are
consistent with M-P zone standards and Comprehensive Plan objec-
tives .
K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED:
1 . City of Renton Building Division
2 . City of Renton Engineering Division
3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division
4 . City of Renton Utilities Division
5 . City of Renton Fire Department
L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS :
1 . The proposal is consistent with the Land Use Element of the
Comprehensive Plan , which designates the site as Manufacturing
Park .
2 . The subject site is zoned M-P with G and G-6000 single family
zoning on the north , south , and southeast . An existing single
family residence exists on the parcel to the south .
3 . The applicant proposes to construct a ±18 ,900 square foot
warehouse/office facility on a ±1 . 1 acre site located at
approximately 1500 Raymond Avenue S .W .
4 . The applicants submitted site plan designates areas for land-
scaping which meet or exceed the minimum 10 foot setback
between the parking and street right-of-way , 5% of the paved
area , and 2% of the total site .
The applicant has indicated that he does not desire approval
at this time for the landscaping plan . However, the applicant
is amenable to future approval by the Planning Department ,
when the building is relatively complete. The applicant feels
that this approach will be advantageous to providing the most
desirable landscape materials .
The Planning Department is generally in agreement with this
approach , subject to the following general criteria :
a . Landscaped berm with groundcover and evergreen shrubs
separating the parking from Raymond Avenue S .W .
b . Provision of street trees on 30 feet ± centers of a canopy
type.
c. Decorative shrubbery and trees in planters adjacent to
the building .
d. Provision of trees throughout the planter areas compatible
with wildlife preservation specified in Resolution 1923.
5 . The following parking summary demonstrates that the proposed
plan meets or exceeds the standards of Chapter 22 , Parking
and Loading Ordinance :
A. Office Space @ 1/200 sq . ft . with ±8 ,662 square
feet = 43 spaces required .
1
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
IHOLMES ELECTRIC , SA-322-79
APRIL 3 , 1979
PAGE FOUR
B . Warehouse Space @ 1/ 1500 sq . ft. with ±10 , 270 square
feet = 7 spaces required .
Total Parking Required = 50 spaces
Total Parking Provided = 52 spaces
6 . In addition to this site plan , the applicant ' s proposed
development will have to conform to and be consistent with
the approved site plan adjacent to the east of the subject
site .
7 . Section 4-2204 . 8E of the Parking and Loading Ordinance requires
a minimum 5 foot wide landscape strip to serve as a buffer
between those portions of a parking area that are adjacent to
properties used and/or zoned for residential purposes . This
section also provides for a minimum 42 inch screening fence
in lieu of the above requirement upon proper application for
good cause shown . The applicant indicates a chain link fence
with wood slats along the northerly and southerly property
lines which are subject to this requirement . On the southerly
portion the fence will either have to be extended for the
length of the site or the planter extended east to meet the
above standard .
8. Two new fire hydrants will be required to be installed prior
to and during building construction as noted by the Fire
Department . Emergency access for emergency equipment between
the existing and new building will also be necessary. Other
items to be supplied include fire extinguishers per the Fire
Code and water main and fire hydrant installation as per
water engineering requirements . These must also meet the
uniform fire code requirements for occupancy type .
9 . Plans for water and sewer main extensions will be required as
per the Utilities Department. Standard charges for water and
sewer must also be paid .
10 . The Engineering Division notes that off-site improvements
consisting of curb , gutter, sidewalk , storm drainage , street
lighting and paving is required on Raymond Avenue S .W .
11 . The Engineering Division also notes that the proposed site
plan requires that for circulation purposes the existing
Holmes Electric site must be included . The inclusion of the
existing Holmes Electric site as a portion of this applica-
tion will require the improvements noted in #10 above for
Seneca Ave. S .W . Alternatives to this requirement include
revising the site plan for this new construction in such a
manner that the existing site area is not utilized or
requesting deferral of the improvements from the Board of
Public Works .
12 . On-site storm water detention/retention is required with
calculations and plans reviewed by the Public Works Depart-
ment.
M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS :
Based upon the above analysis , recommend approval subject to :
1 . Final approval of a detailed landscaping plan per analysis
4 by the Planning Department.
2 . Approval of plans for public street , storm drainage and
utilities by the Public Works Department .
3 . Extension of planting or fencing per Section 4-2204-8B as
noted in Analysis #7 .
4. Installation of fire protection per Analysis #8.
1 )
G
t
k ! s. w—
T
1
1
S i...------
y -------
1 Ufi— o
i's
7.,....., ,,.,....„, ,,-.... ,......„..• .z....,
1
I 1
0 10- offil I\ 1 1
IIItINrgllitllllllln rl Ilb I IN
I 1.
Al
1 I I.
II. .Ac,,F Fr.-1H , .I ntmlt I,I1 1,
L tHCR
c •' 1101111--,•11 II III Iii' .. •04 I,
o.! ,
i I
r'OR - • ' I Illllua .,Q I.I II ;k "' YI:I
RIIII'llil '} Imo III II i TO I)
tl 1r :.. ,1 1,,: III Tn
r ,inii
f fig 1111111
II Itilllllll iirulIdlh• Ill llu'.1111 Y M + II t I
4„
1 y iu,
vgit
1 II IIIII: InuN- 6 T: __
PP' Y l1 lull:'___.
MillilLeiglAijj1
UII
all WU- 7/jL'siiim.rp.v.! ,4
liwirmis . Or MI .!.
I , „_A -,
N\
17....:_:.;., : .--, r_ -b.I-,. Di AI 4 ., ,-„ 1,
R-4 I A-0-- , /'6., '0O- fr gm L11 r _:If
s' is
1
1- - i,L:-`...1-._._
i _
O = _ •1 g «
r-,, .--
v'-- r - , 1 :-_ ----r . III
t.,,,,,, . ,„,,c.,.,_,,„...„-_ ,,,,: ,„_ . ._ , . __, ,
u
Li
os.,.. T,O.. _CLA,M
f
r
r
1 77. IV
U I d
I
W I o i
fi = G
tiCi
in-- \O
HOLMES ELECTRIC , SA-322-79
APPLICANT HOLMES ELECTRIC
TOTAL AREA +4 ,nnn s;;._ft .
PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Raymond Avenue S .W .
EXISTING ZONING M-P , Manufacturing Park
EXISTING USE Undeveloped
ROFOSLD USE Warehouse/Office Facility
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park
COMMENTS
J
q,
0S.,'
1 i >_
d tE:44NC1 rrr ai,,G. j
r 1
xJ'YWA..1(H.091.I 7Fir 1yy AI_ 3 6)
c
T.
q d
um
1V 'T...... J.-t•.E._1 lb"' }i '.) .tt+.v-r(Na 1
wr .s""""' II',lr•. •..
silo
rit . Lt
Alyea es P
p:azi.
x
1 1r NsOt(1
4 i
sig ,i.- giatl P 11 Ili, ‘I1P
e Oft).°II
Trio L v` t Y.S . 6.4 _tii wLa-
y
CY_ I A1.r I , Y)f • i
Ili 6
j j 1
I r
as a . •.• . • . . `
t•
I iz..•.%•-'..
4:s ly
e ..:..;.,S:,....'.:. "/1r d C.M...r`
J • lam•wt••Y,,, ,......:.
14j
bLt M!--,-i ce! '
Nye l . . i
A"CK r-
t ryi1E s' -*
J1 'gyp
1
I
i=
i..,..•
r,.
7 ,r •,', .- •>_ _ .-,e I•
a
Leo Ctair y,
A
A INS 'IN6- i
o p( U Itil JDUNDA 0
MINI, 1rfggiefAlliEf 1
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
TO : O Finance Department
8 Fire Department
Library Department
QPark Department
Police Department
O Public W S Department
Building Div .
QEngineering Div . (Please verify legal description )
8 Traffic Engineering Div.
Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or
his designee )/
IWVVU/!! e DATE : 9 /6
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR :
APPLICANT : tireAe-tli-te
LOCATION : 4*xir,c' 6Z es
APPLICATION(S ) : (/4 A9%f4i/_ 9€-r1
IN Of.DER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING E MI ' .
RETUM:N ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY :
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : K
1 Approved Not Approved
Comments or conditions :
i -- / -7
Signature of Director or Author zed Representative Date
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
TO : O Finance Department
8 Fire Department
Library Department
OPark Department
g2 ice Department
Public Works Department
O B ding Div.
Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description )
8 Traffic Engineering Div .
Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or
his designee)
mpo DATE : V/6/7,
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR :
APPLICANT : 1e J iel/-te
rid M/6 -4
LOCATION : 5FO sal 6APPLICATION(S) : 41/ 9/4f41/- oee-ti
IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING E , MI Sj
RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : * 9f!
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : L ,..-e ,r_
Q Approved Not Approved
Comments or conditions :
f
td
74
2,/,,
2 4c.t, er
cl -d -? `)/, 7/ 2,-r „ Lt._ v 3 led -z
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative) Date
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
T0 : O Finance Department
8 Fire Department
Library Department
OPark Department
OPolice Department
O Public Works Department
O Building Div .
I) E gineering Div . (Please verify legal description )
Traffic Engineering Div .
O Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or
his designee)
2Uz9 e 4/ 45)el DATE : 1/
7/
0/
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR :
APPLICANT : ei J' AI,'i'e
LOCATION : 4XIWC/ 511
APPLICATION(S) : 0;4. mod/ e€ 71
IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING MI T
RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY :
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :
001 Approved ED Not Approved
Co ments or conditions :
S gnature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
TO: finance Department
Fire Department
Library Department
OPark Department
OPolice Department
OPublic Works Department
O Building Div .
OEngineering Div . (Please verify legal description )
Traffic Engineering Div .
fi''' --- l%' Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or
his designee)
a & V3 DATE : /44 i'l
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR :
APPLICANT : J/e ? Aedfte
s sw/a i-
APPLICATION(S) :
LOCATION : 9 r/ ("%
6 t A#/4i/- oe''- 71
IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING E MI
RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : 3
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : f//
EnApproved Not Approved v4s it cv ,c%/..' = ,`i',t,--//i_S
Comments or conditions : 49 4)«//?G"o. 3:,,:- /tip-i7zze.:1,_7 /%'/ems'
T
1,v/J !J t/'/.tJc;' /GO/A/C C'c„vS i=',.0 ,'cif. C-/1-9 7=C i.':t..'y_/Jl'c c S %,'' /('r:- G n,c
Ld" //G'/./
c ti7 i 3b'i :ZG/V 5-:/,tic: A-,a/!') it/_'"LL) ,C e./i,--
1/.1/C , i 6i ;i)- i(:.0 /'r;.c.'cy
2 AJ ,.f
f/ rG /1 y,C2/'/-A,.7- /ivS /1-6-c,/9 7(//t, A,S iL<c' Gvi1%"0'Z A--G'/.c)c2,,;1 l
Ci%u i i„
Ck" ?,y y . 4
Signature of Director or Authorized Represent tive Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : Uiit_trl tA'''tn'7e .I7
Zr Approved E:1 Not Approved
Comments or conditions :
1,,TLt MW/AA orcAAsid,v- ....,ILL gE ,'( 10, (N4„ it„";
dv/L n II Is , p
i,
e0I/5ati pt w"i)%VL
i C ji\f
7--)
0....,t.
Sfgnature of Director or Auth rized Representative Date
ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS
TO: O Finance Department
illFire
Department
Library Department
Park Department
Police Department
Q Public W ri(Department
ReBuilding Div.
Engineering Div .
O Traffic Engineering Div .
Q Utilities Engineering Div.
FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his
designee ) LØL_7Mfl
Application No . : Q- 79
SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 44, --N
Action Name : laill a2tz" t° 42""
41
Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) :
Note : Responses to be written in ink .
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : 1(/ ) (1,
1 ' SIGNIFICANT ANON SIGNIFICANT
Comments :
j- 2)/
c, Date
Signature of Director or Authorized 'Representative
ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS
TO: O Finance Department
ill
Fire Department
Library Department
Park Department
Police Department
0 Public Works Department
8 Building Div .
ineering Div.
Traffic Engineering Div .
O Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his
designee ) PO001i2___ _—
SUBJECT : Review of ECF- Ll Application No . :_ e 1'
Action Name : L/`l aeree ? 'D /--—-—___
k
Please review the attached . Review requested by date) : V09
Note : Responses to be written in ink.
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
e t 1' <. !/ 't . 1 A: 1 ti'O
Department :
1 ! SIGNIFICANT 4/1 NON SIGNIFICANT
Comments :
it Ir , y- • L=c _ _ Y L- /J
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative
Date
F
ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS
TO: O Finance Department
illFire
Department
Library Department
Park Department
rice Department
Public Works Department
411 B ' lding Div .
e Engineering Div .
O Traffic Engineering Div .
O Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department, ( signed by responsible official or his
designee)
wimto W/Ofririu
Application No . :_ 1IP' /#9
SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 7
Action Name : leL/ii a rge t eO "
brIPleasereviewtheattached . Review requested by (date) : Vr
Note : Responses to be written in ink .
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :
SIGNIFICANT Y\INON SIGNIFICANT
Comments :
Date
Signature of Di ector or Authorized Representative
1
ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS
TO: O rnance Department
Fire Department
Library Department
Park Department
Police Department
0 Public Works Department
Building Div .
Engineering Div .
Q T affic Engineering Div .
ilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his
designee )__
W/o/79I
1SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 4, 41 ; Application No . : 1•••° 7'9
1:14/Action Name : 140,9 /4/6
iw Q_ W /€b
Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) :1,®/7
Note: Responses to be written in ink .
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : ' r//`mil
SIGNIFICANT I 'rNON SIGNIFICANT :14A, .-'`'c` F/%. iiri?6--/I1c/7'-S
Comments : fej-ivr/.,eG--0. / % T,c,S%irLc.c'))"eGG' .- 4,t/J G),ii=i.uc.
C,-S%?uC /r d xJ , NI /ar i s%fit/c, /
fo G `
pitom L7 `yr
7 -
Signature
Date
of Director r Au horized Representati 'e
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
1,(T(arY r0bl1
Department :____
SIGNIFICANT 11 NON SIGNIFICANT
Comments :
el 2/2"i/7.
Signature of Director Authorized Representat;
11)
ive Date
PROPOSED/FINAL L.-LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCEd ...N-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No . SA-322-79 0 PROPOSED Declaration
Environmental Checklist No . ECF-440-79 El FINAL Declaration
Description of proposal The applicant requests site approval for develop-
ment of an 18,900± square foot warehousLoffice facility in an M-P zone.
Proponent HOLMES ELECTRIC
Location of Proposal Vicinity of 1500 Raymond Avenue S.W.
Lead Agency Renton Planning Department_
This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not have a
significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS is
x] is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) (c ) . This decision was
made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental
checklist and other information on file with the lead agency .
Reasons for declaration of env ironmental/s ngnificance : ,This
declaration is based on the provision of suitable landscaping, screening, and
other development standards which reduce visual and other impacts of the
development and are consistent with M-P zone standards and Comprehensive Plan
objectives.
Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the
environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would
withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final )
declaration of non-significance :
Responsible Off ' i al Gordon Y. Ericksen
Title Pla ;ng Dir ct r Date March 28 1979
Signature iii/7 tza7/2 4
City of Renton
j'S/'/ I Planning Department
5 -76
CITY OF RENTON F RE/
APPLICATION ORD qk
SITE APPROVALlc)MAR g 1919
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
File No. SA- SA.9-17/ Filing Datey
Application Fee $ Receipt No.
Environmental Review Fee $
3/9/7
APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 :
1 . Name Holmes Electric (contact Gene Richards or Jeray Holmesphone255-8666
Address 1415 Seneca S.W. Renton Wash. 98055
2 . Property location 1500 Raymond Ave. S.W. Renton, Wash.
3 . Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary)
Lots 21 to 25 Block 30 C. D. Hillmans Earlington Garden Division No. 1.
4 . Number of acres or square feet 1.48,000 s.f. Present zoning
M.P. zone
5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? We plan to build
a office/warehouse of 18,932 sq. ft. to be used by an electrical contractor
business.
6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application :
A. Site and access plan (include setbacks ,
Scale
existing structures , easements , and other
factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 '
B. Parking , landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 '
C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning
on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 '
D. Building height and area (existing and proposed)
7 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION :
Date Approved
Date Denied
Date Appealed
Appeal Action
Remarks
Planning Dept .
Rev. 1-77.:
a.
r.
AFFIDAVIT
4cI being duly sworn, declare that I
am t e owner of the property involved in this application and that the
foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief.
Subscribed and
sworn
before me
this /day of Aa2 1979 ,
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing at Ga2 .vC,
7( Z‘ze e,„)..37-7(1:7_
4,--/z,amfl Nary Public) S nature of Owner
0,TV 3 4x ).dae , 4)1 I/-z. , ,
S
Address) Address)
Ze.4..-6 --- 4,,_,A.J
City) State)
1<,,-- Si 4 4 k
Telephone)
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me
and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to
conform to the rul egulations of the Renton Planning Department
governing the f ' e RE application .
clab
s(311/
Date Receivea
U
19 By:
OR
1i.
F- 1
9 Renton Planning Dept .ti
N:-/NG DEQP%' 2-73
I
REVCITYOFRENTON, WASHINGTON•
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM aEF_IUE
V
I - MAR 9 1979
44,
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 9 41,1, Ac4DEr
Application No.
Environmental Checklist No. 9/ 4-71p
PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date:
Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance
Declaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance
COMMENTS:
Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires
all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their
own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be
prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.
The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a
proposal is such a major action.
Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where
you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should
include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele-
vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all
agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with-
out unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with-
out duplicating paperwork in the future.
NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to
your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue' on to the
next question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I . BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent Holmes Electrical Contractors
2. Address and phone number of Proponent:
1415 Seneca S.W.
Renton, Washington 98055
206) 255-8666
3. Date Checklist submitted
4. Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton Planning Department
5. Name of proposal , if applicable:
Holmes Flertric Building
6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate
understanding of its scope and nature) :
This is a tilt-up concrete office/warehouse building, finished primar-
ily in exposed aggregate. At the front of the building is a 8,000 s.f.
2 story office incorporating earth berms and sunscreens on its south
and western faces. The rear of the building is a 10,000 s.f. warehouse,
used primarily for storage of electrical fixtures and hardware.
2- f ' t
7. Location of ;;roposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well
as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including
any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ-
mental setting of the proposal ) :
The building will be located just south of Highway 405 in a flat
partially wooded rural area.
8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal :
August, 1979
9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal
federal , state and local --including rezones) :
1 ) City of Renton Building Permit.
2) State Flood Control Permit.
3) State Highway Storm Water Runoff Permit.
10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain:
No
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal ? If yes , explain:
No
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, ccscribe the nature of such application form:
State Flood Control Permit: to establish finish floor elevation.
State Highway Water Runoff Permit: to allow use of State Highway 405
for storm water runoff`.
II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1) Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over-
covering of the soil?X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Change in topography or ground surface relief
Xfeatures?
YES MAY FV
d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features? X
YES RTTEIE 0—
e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils ,
either on or off the site?
YES MAYBE NO
f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
X
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
YES MAYBE WO—
Explanation: _
Grading and compactions per soils report and civil engineer to
establish building pad, finish floor height ards-ite drainage_ _
3-
2) Air. Will the proposal result in:
a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality?
YES MAYBE NU—
b) The creation of objectionable odors? - X
YET— MAYBE N-
c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,
or any change in climate , either locally or
regionally? X
Y1's MAYBE AU—
Explanation:
a) use of light trucks may have some impact on the air quality
of the area.
3) Water. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in currents , or the course of' direction of
water movements. in either marine or fresh waters? X
YES MAYBE 0--
b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns, or
Xtherateandamountofsurfacewaterrunoff?
MATTE NU—
c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
YES MAYBE NO
d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
Xbody?
YEs MMAYBE NO
e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration
surface water quality, including but not limited to
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X
YES MAYBE 0
f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
Xgroundwaters?
YET— MAYBE N—
g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either
through direct additions or withdrawals , or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X
YES MAYBE NO
h) Deterioration in ground water quality. either through
direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate,
phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria .
or other substances into the ground waters? X
E- MAYBE 0—
i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available
Xforpublicwatersupplies?
Yc MAYBE AD--
Explanation:
b) absorption rates will be altered by site coverage of the paved ,
areas and building footprint.
4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:
a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any
species of flora (including trees , shrubs, grass . crops.
microflora and aquatic plants)?
vrf_ ROE
X
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique. rare or
endangered species of flora? X
Yl` MAYBE Nb—
c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area. or
in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing
species? X
YET MAYBE 0—
d) Reduction In acreage of any agricultural crop?
vrf- um 0—
Explanation:
4-
5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds, land animals including
reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms ,
insects or microfauna)?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna? X
YES M YBE NO
c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area,
or result in a barrier to the migration or movement
of fauna? X
YES MAYBE NO
d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X
YES M YBE NO
Explanation:
6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
Use of light trucks may increase noise levels in the area.
7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or
glare? X
YES MAYBE W
Explanation:
8) Land Use. Will the proposal result, in the alteration of the
present or planned land use of an area? X
YE-S MAYBE NO
Explanation:
9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X
YES M NO
Explanation:
10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X
YES MAYBE
Explanation:
11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, or growth rate of the human population
of an area? X
YET— MAYBE AU—
Explanation:
5
12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand
for new parking? X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?X
YES MAYBE NO
d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods? X
YE M YBE NO
e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
YE- MAYBE NO
f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles ,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
1E MAYBE NO
Explanation:
a) Additional vehicular movement will result from employees and
movement of light trucks to and from work sites. (b) On-site
parking will be provided for employees and visitors.
14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection?
YES MAYBE(
b) Police protection?X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Schools? X
YES MAYBE NO
d) Parks or other recreational facilities?X
YES MAYBE NO
e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X
YES MAYBE NO
f) Other governmental services?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
a) & (b) Fire and police protection will be required for the
facility.
15) Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
YES E NORATITE
b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
Xthedevelopmentofnewsourcesofenergy?
YET— MAYBE W
Explanation:
16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? X
YES RATITE NO
b) Communications systems? X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Water? X
YES MAYBE NO
i
M
i
6-
d) Sewer or septic tanks? X
YES MAYBENO
e) Storm water drainage? X
YES M YBE -
f) Solid waste and disposal?X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)? X
YES MAYBE tr
Explanation:
18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
Xqualityorquantityofexistingrecreationalopportunities?
YES MAYBE 4-0--
Explanation:
20) Archeological Historical . Will the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeological or historical
site, structure, object or building? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
III. SIGNATURE
I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information
is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla-
ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should
there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Proponent:
signed)
name printed)
City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76
OF Rt'lr
f ... z THE CITY OF RENT ON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
Gt CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
y 235- 2550
P
9-
eo SEF4*-
1-
March 21 , 1979
Holmes Electric
1415 Seneca S .W.
Renton , Washington 98055
ATTENTION : Gene Richards/Jeray Holmes
RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE
AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR
SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT AN OFFICE/WAREHOUSE
IN AN M-P ZONE , File SA-322-79 ; property located
at 1500 Raymond Ave . S . W .
Dear Sirs :
The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above
mentioned application on March 9 , 1979 A public
Fearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been
set for April 3 , 1979. at 9 : 00 a . m. .
Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present .
All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing .
If you have any further questions , please cai 'l the Renton
Planning Department , 235-2550 .
Very truly yours ,
Gordon Y TEricksen
Tannin - Director
i
By :i(j( ( UtChte
l
vbavid R. Clemens
Associate Planner
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON ,
WASHINGTON , ON APRIL 3 1979 , AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER
THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS :
1. FRANCIS J . BRIERE , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM
G TO SR- 1 , File R-306-79 ; property located in
the vicinity of 1800 Duvall Ave, N. E .
2. THE AUSTIN COMPANY , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL
PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN H-1 ZONE, File
SP-320-79 ; property located between East Valley
Road and Lind Avenue on the south side of S .W .
16th Ave. So. to proposed S .W. 19th Street .
3. HOLMES ELECTRIC , APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT
AN OFFICE/WAREHOUSE IN M-P ZONE , File SA-322-79 ;
property located at 1500 Raymond Ave. S .W.
Applications noted above on file in the Renton
Planning Department.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 3 , 1979 AT 9: 00 A. M. TO
EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS.
GORDON Y . ERICKSEN
PUBLISHED March 23 , 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR
CERTIFICATION
DAVID R . CLEMENS HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES
OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES
ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW .
ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn
to before me, a Notary Public ,
on the 21st day of March
19 79 SIGNED 0f,c2
NOTICE
THIS _ PROPERTY
GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS:
1500 RAYMOND AVENUE S.W.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF
A PUBLIC HEARING '
TO BE HELD
IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING
ON APRIL 3, 1979 BEGINNING AT 9: 00 A.M.
CONCERNING ITEM 1.4
n REZONE
Fl SPECIAL PERMIT
VSITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT OFFICE/WAREHOUSE IN M-P
ZONE
I I WAIVER
H SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT
n _
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550
THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
APRIL 3 , 1979
APPLICANT : HOLMES ELECTRIC
FILE NUMBER : SA-322-79
A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST :
The applicant requests site approval for development of an
18 ,900± warehouse/office facility in an M-P zone . ( Site develop-
ment map attached . )
B . GENERAL INFORMATION :
1 . Owner of Record : EUGENE M. RICHARDS
2 . Applicant : HOLMES ELECTRIC
3. Location :Vicinity of 1500 Raymond
Vicinity Map attached) Avenue S . W .
4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description
is available on file in the
Renton Planning Department.
5. Size of Property : 48 ,000 square feet .
6 . Access ; Via Raymond Avenue S .W .
7 . Existing Zoning : M-P , Manufacturing Park .
8. Existing Zoning in the Area : M-P , Manufacturing Park ; L- 1 ,
Light Industrial ; G , General
Classification District ; G-6000 ,
Residential Single Family.
9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Manufacturing Park .
10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in
writing of the hearing date .
Notice was properly published
in the Record Chronicle on
March 23 , 1979 , and posted
in three places on or near the
site as required by City ordi -
nance on March 22 , 1979 .
C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND:
The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 1745 on
April 14 , 1959 . The property was rezoned from " G" to "M-P" by
Ordinance 3210 on April 7 , 1978.
D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND:
1 . Topography : The site is relatively level . Approximately
one-fifth of the site to the north consists of fill material
three to four feet deep.
2 . Soils : Urban Land ( Ur) . The erosion hazard is slight to
moderate . No capability or woodland classification .
3. Vegetation : The westerly portion of the property contains
some deciduous and evergreen trees while the remainder of
the site consists principally of scrub grass .
4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation provides some habitat for
birds and small mammals .
P ANNING DEPARTMENT
P 'ELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
HILMES ELECTRIC , SA-322-79
A' RIL 3 , 1979
PAGE TWO
5 . Water : No standing water was evidenced on the subject site .
6 . Land Use : The subject site is presently undeveloped.
E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS :
The general area is in a transitional state from undeveloped and
single family residence property to commercial and industrial
uses .
F. PUBLIC SERVICES :
1 . Water and Sewer : An existing twelve ( 12 ) inch water main
runs along S . W . 16th Street. Nearest sanitary sewer is a
twenty-four ( 24) inch line that runs along S . W . 16th Street
and terminates at S .W . 16th Street and Raymond Avenue S . W .
2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department
as per ordinance requirements .
3 . Transit : Metro Transit Routes 240 and 161 operate along
S .W . Grady Way within 800 feet to the north of the subject
site .
4 . Schools : Not applicable .
5 . Recreation : Not applicable .
Ga APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE :
1 . Section 4-712 , Light Industry District .
2 . Section 4-728 , " G, " General Classification District .
3 . Section 4-730 , Manufacturing Park .
H , APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS :
1 . Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan , June, 1976 , Objectives ,
pages 5 - 7 .
2 . Resolution 1923 relating to City adoption of Soil Conservation
Service requirements for landscaping and wildlife habitat.
3 . Comprehensive Plan , Land Use Report , 1965 , Objectives , pages
17 - 18 .
I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT :
1 . Natural Systems : Development of the subject site will disturb
soil and vegetation , increase storm water runoff, and have an
effect on traffic and noise levels in the area . However ,
through proper development controls and procedures , these
impacts can be mitigated.
2 . Population/ Employment : The nature of the use is such that
there isn ' t likely to be any significant change in population .
However , completion of the facilities will provide approxi -
mately 23 additional employment opportunities ( 1 . 2 employees/
1 , 000 square feet) .
3 . Schools : Not applicable.
4 . Social : Not applicable .
5 . Traffic : The proposed warehouse/office facility will generate
approximately 450 additional vehicle trips per day for the
warehouseing use ( 3 . 68 trips per 1 ,000 square feet plus 374
trips ) on Raymond Avenue S .W.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
HOLMES ELECTRIC , SA-322-79
APRIL 3 , 1979
PAGE THREE
J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION :
Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the
State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C ,
a declaration of negative impact has been issued for the subject
proposal . This declaration is further based on the provision of
suitable landscaping , screening , and other development standards
which reduce visual and other impacts of the development and are
consistent with M-P zone standards and Comprehensive Plan objec-
tives .
K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED :
1 . City of Renton Building Division
2 . City of Renton Engineering Division
3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division
4 . City of Renton Utilities Division
5 . City of Renton Fire Department
L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS :
1 . The proposal is consistent with the Land Use Element of the
Comprehensive Plan , which designates the site as Manufacturing
Park .
2 . The subject site is zoned M-P with G and G-6000 single family
zoning on the north , south , and southeast . An existing single
family residence exists on the parcel to the south .
3 . The applicant proposes to construct a ±18 ,900 square foot
warehouse/office facility on a ±1 . 1 acre site located at
approximately 1500 Raymond Avenue S .W .
4 . The applicants submitted site plan designates areas for land-
scaping which meet or exceed the minimum 10 foot setback
between the parking and street right-of-way , 5% of the paved
area , and 2% of the total site .
The applicant has indicated that he does not desire approval
at this time for the landscaping plan . However , the applicant
is amenable to future approval by the Planning Department ,
when the building is relatively complete. The applicant feels
that this approach will be advantageous to providing the most
desirable landscape materials .
The Planning Department is generally in agreement with this
approach , subject to the following general criteria :
a . Landscaped berm with groundcover and evergreen shrubs
separating the parking from Raymond Avenue S .W .
b . Provision of street trees on 30 feet ± centers of a canopy
type.
c. Decorative shrubbery and trees in planters adjacent to
the building .
d . Provision of trees throughout the planter areas compatible
with wildlife preservation specified in Resolution 1923 .
5 . The following parking summary demonstrates that the proposed
plan meets or exceeds the standards of Chapter 22 , Parking
and Loading Ordinance :
A. Office Space @ 1/200 sq . ft . with ±8 ,662 square
feet = 43 spaces required .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
HOLMES ELECTRIC , SA-322-79
APRIL 3 , 1979
PAGE FOUR
B . Warehouse Space @ 1/ 1500 sq . ft. with ±10 , 270 square
feet = 7 spaces required .
Total Parking Required = 50 spaces
Total Parking Provided = 52 spaces
6 . In addition to this site plan , the applicant ' s proposed
development will have to conform to and be consistent with
the approved site plan adjacent to the east of the subject
site .
7 . Section 4-2204 . 8E of the Parking and Loading Ordinance requires
a minimum 5 foot wide landscape strip to serve as a buffer
between those portions of a parking area that are adjacent to
properties used and/or zoned for residential purposes . This
section also provides for a minimum 42 inch screening fence
in lieu of the above requirement upon proper application for
good cause shown . The applicant indicates a chain link fence
with wood slats along the northerly and southerly property
lines which are subject to this requirement . On the southerly
portion the fence will either have to be extended for the
length of the site or the planter extended east to meet the
above standard.
8. Two new fire hydrants will be required to be installed prior
to and during building construction as noted by the Fire
Department . Emergency access for emergency equipment between
the existing and new building will also be necessary. Other
items to be supplied include fire extinguishers per the Fire
Code and water main and fire hydrant installation as per
water engineering requirements . These must also meet the
uniform fire code requirements for occupancy type.
9 . Plans for water and sewer main extensions will be required as
per the Utilities Department. Standard charges for water and
sewer must also be paid .
10 . The Engineering Division notes that off-site improvements
consisting of curb , gutter, sidewalk , storm drainage , street
lighting and paving is required on Raymond Avenue S .W .
11 . The Engineering Division also notes that the proposed site
plan requires that for circulation purposes the existing
Holmes Electric site must be included . The inclusion of the
existing Holmes Electric site as a portion of this applica-
tion will require the improvements noted in #10 above for
Seneca Ave. S . W . Alternatives to this requirement include
revising the site plan for this new construction in such a
manner that the existing site area is not utilized or
requesting deferral of the improvements from the Board of
Public Works .
12 . On-site storm water detention/retention is required with
calculations and plans reviewed by the Public Works Depart-
ment.
M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS :
Based upon the above analysis , recommend approval subject to :
1 . Final approval of a detailed landscaping plan per analysis
4 by the Planning Department.
2 . Approval of plans for public street , storm drainage and
utilities by the Public Works Department.
3 . Extension of planting or fencing per Section 4-2204-8B as
noted in Analysis #7 .
4 . Installation of fire protection per Analysis #8 .
Gcc..„
I ii I U I
00
pi itr
Z
ec u::
t "
tl1:) .\. ----;iN` i
9
M 1 r.
L-l % a
A I_
t--;
i,
II ,1un1.-i1,uuIqnu wluImowI'I' '
I' - =
I I .
p
O./4 I01110I gnlil .. 0• 011i
W°a III . 1( L wypliIN • 1
3I N Inil'
II .- .1dI . Ii;; ,
it "
N A. q1 pll
f.il*
III III .101,... lII! ;III i IIIIII l
i
y ii 111I llrW: I s il
44
i I
Ulu
9.....-.-_,--_---,-.:... .ogii4Wlls,
11 4 _,
1,11w.1 .
te
i
2 f . s
Al
iuK_ 1Ili II r
r
111.01,
1
1 \ -..il,- 4411 -e-..,'/_-::::1V-:31,-.:-:---:7;1.1:--.1..!--2:• ._7 6„0.9_0_ .r.,_1 ::
11i ;,,i: --!L:\..„ -..
1.1 7--
1RitiA. ' -CI'L--17:-41 mot- i'il'ri -e.....4 - lb- i : 1 i. ---i 1'' . -9.7" '
ii r y L. - - - ' -. . . - 14:-,---4- -11 • - 12 -...:' ii'
M111'T4L may. ' , M _.'
CI i
j..{..1RY ME^pfcR P414TIOA CLAIM
1
1 111111IIIW
I M
MILLI
I0
l
c ...,Li_ T.:_
r_''-',
Z-7177— 110
1 .___—
HOMES ELECTRIC , SA-322-79
APPLICANT HOLMES ELECTRIC TOTAL AREA ±4R ,0nf sq ft .
PR IN: IPAL ACCESS Via Raymond Avenue S .W .
EXISTING ZONING M-P , Manufacturing Park
EXISTING USE Undeveloped
i
II
Warehouse/Office FacilityPROPOSEDUSE i
COMFREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park
COMMENTS
I
4
Aesr•.t.r••e'
rVif
ii
xrY• ..xr.F
Est• Aw.
f4k4 1 ex,.."..,•..") '
c
w „
tikat,)) A., p QM
r br.r tea. 1rr/Mi•*+ 6 r,t T•i1CA 1 j
s+tr..
t.
1
A
1
1.
ILII/ i.i
i
fatiAt
4.
rKL• ki
a.'f.a:•C !
F•f L/.,' '' L—_./ter' 1:',
Gt6 ri• fot) IttlifI :
gi°1141)1
VIVA
f-4 I!..e. ! i.Aril! Zil '71- V
t k
tI
r
J
i a
71
vantjj0•+Lt ni WOi%yX,S
a r
y'
r'll ice:I r .,
i k4
tea t J1 ice/
r.s,d ..,,A...
II te4.
4'4-
e•
I QC
to if ir-
f g 14 72.-'r -, 1p10129 It,*
P1t1/t RTl glOu t '3 I d
DAL , i I:
s yo,ri s,.Lc. ?
yr..a, ..s .;u ros eta' ce,
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
TO : 0 Finance Department
8 Fire Department
Library Department
OPark Department
OPolice Department
O Public W S Department
Building Div .
0 Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description )
8 Traffic Engineering Div.
Utilities Engineering Div.
FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or
his designee )
3At'/,O el,r DATE :I/10'.
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR :
APPLICANT : 4/l/Ac /fi g
LOCATION : 546 (J1`(Y
APPLICATION(S) : Gll4 Gal-- e'€I1
IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING E) MI E
RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY :
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : 2 • (-) K
Ei Approved ED Not Approved
Comments or conditions :
k 7/
i -
Signature .of Director or Authord Representative Date
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
TO: O Finance Department
8 Fire Department
Library Department
OPark Department
0 ce Department
Public Works Department
O B ding Div.
Engineering Div . ( Please verify legal description )
8 Traffic Engineering Div .
Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or
hi s designee )
Apo e 61 Ae,tX/J DATE : V/6M'
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR :
APPLICANT : A6/ne aafte
LOCATION : 52 *the 5/0 6 •M/a g-
APPLICATION(S) : Lam'! G(/_ o1i€ i1
IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING E MI
RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY :
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : l >.ce.-,e-,.1
d Approved E3 Not Approved
Comments or conditions :
2,,0 ,3/;%/. 2,,i ,,..„.„/,,__ 31e//7-,
Signature of Director or Authorized Representatives Date
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
TO : O Finance Department
8 Fire Department
Library Department
OPark Department
OPolice Department
0 Public Works Department
O Building Div .
OE gfneering Div . (Please verify legal description )
e Traffic Engineering Div .
O Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or
his designee )
U 12/3U a DATE : V/0/
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR :
APPLICANT : 0 /nfe AeI,' e
LOCATION : 5S 6 . 4)4g
APPLICATION(S) : 4 fM o€4'1
IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING E MI
RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY :
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
1 _ 1 S l 1 1, 1 1 f' 1 .
De artment :
Approved ED Not Approved
Co meets or conditions :
I, c ' 't ,, ',,
t" 112
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
TO: 0 -finance Department
Fire Department
Library Department
OPark Department
OPolice Department
OPublic Works Department
O Building Div .
OEngineering Div . ( Please verify legal description )
Traffic Engineering Div .
c_lr Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or
his designee )
U4U/p i2 &C41W3 DATE :40 179
PLEASE REVIEW THIISS APPLICATION FOR :
APPLICANT : Pi J'f Aed#e
LOCATION : 1 +Kited51
APPLICATION(S) : e. c4P id/—
IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING) MI
RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY :
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : f6eEQApproved Not Approved i'C // //z. ;s t.J N`" S
Comments or conditions : ta-c)c.//?e"o, c,',Jeff
1/S?'. / i tJ C/I-9-C' :t,c- cc'C
La ///`c ti i3:c- X ,S i/,(Jc: /1-.t/l,) r(3(C
EX"
41 it. J
i / /' /
1 4 c ? i/IJS;/1 S =Gj/c`: /
c
M'S'GNG 1 f
Signature of Director or Authorized Represent tive Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : U;n_it-e r.'r r-i: .i 7""
zi Approved Not Approved
Comments or conditions :
viAr(../_ p4aiu (;krrmsic `s •.,I'L g 4,1.(4VIC:9) (Ni ,i 60P4 ,
D 1/S'cLr1 FL A_ I.V A i 01_
Signature of Director or Auth rized Representative Date
ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS
TO: Q Finance Department
IIIFire
Department
Library Department
Park Department
Police Department
0 Public W i( Department
Building Div .
Engineering Div .
0 Traffic Engineering Div.
0 Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his
designee )
A 1 awEik&___.
SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 44, --71 ; Application No . : 2' 4
Action Name : 90/ arere-004 /0 `"-
b
Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) : Ip/ev9/7-
Note : Responses to be written in ink .
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : 7l l) C
SIGNIFICANT ANON SIGNIFICANT
Comments :
i /.--.(i. ->, '',` ,'-___- 7. 2ey
Date
Signature "of Director or Authorized Representative
ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS
TO: O Finance Department
IIIFire
Department
Library Department
Park Department
Police Department
O Public Works Department
8 Building Div .
eineering
Div.
Traffic Engineering Div .
Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his
designee )-
1214 V 12- ----e
SUBJECT : Review of ECF-ALIL;Application No . A le 79
Action Name : GA( aretee 1 /D 1__
I J . k
Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) : 45027
Note : Responses to be written in ink .
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : k.,- /—fic E ct' (wv :I (_ t,,' ip< ,
I ! SIGNIFICANT 4/1 NON SIGNIFICANT
Comments :
s'
Date
Signature of Director or Authorizedepfresentative
ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHtJKLIST FORMS
TO: O Finance Department
IIIFire
Department
Library Department
Park Department
ice Department
Public Works Department
40 B ' lding Div .
e Engineering Div .
O Traffic Engineering Div .
Q Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department, ( signed by responsible official or his
designehe)
VIV___ ______ I fr9
SUBJECT : Review of ECF-77 ; Application No . :
Act ionion Name : 41?6/ e 04/_
if,o 6,efeiL-4d-e---
Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) :1PP7 7/—
Note : Responses to be written in ink .
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :
SIGNIFICANT l NON SIGNiFICANT
Comments :
Date '
Signature of Di ector or Authorized Representative
ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CnL..KLIST FORMS
TO: O inance Department
Fire Department
Library Department
Park Department
Police Department
Q Public Works Department
8 Building Div .
Engineering Div .
O T affic Engineering Div .
1 Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his
designee )_____
A1112-- -- e-- ,MaL04—_ L /7 9
SUBJECT : Review of ECF- Application No . . g2" 7'941
Action Name : 10,841/ ree
i;ipe7 i/fi A
Please review the attached . Review requested by date ) : 1,
Note : Responses to be written in ink .
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : c 7,,r,;-s
SIGNIFICANT I -rNON SIGNIFICANT 'a%' '"`
th.9. igt r ;/,zcc:O(',;'j 2 :,- //,,,,s' G>«i.'ii..:c.
Comments :
5i,! LD/6.L- C•"
S.-%
kC -ILJ ,
O4:-,-ri/S/ r//-.`' Z v ;//t,i/
G/c C(JV
rN.
UJ_'/1 t.: iA S%, 7Cc /t dl / S I Gc- 7 G
C ,o w!9itt z 0/4-: /tic./J
S_,G i.i/°/'/"t / .L C) Z. le
c, C
fa/,_ l 5 / l 7y
Date
Signature of Director r Au horized Representati e
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
t,Cn to TY 0-a -r
Department :_-
I ' SIGNIFICANT 11 NON SIGNIFICANT
Comments :
C1v..
2 1/2'i
Signature of Director r Authorized Representative Date
ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CI,.....(L I ST FORMS
TO: O Finance Department
III
Fire Department
Library Department
Park Department
rice Department
Public Works Department
411 B • lding Div .
e Engineering Div .
O Traffic Engineering Div .
O Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his
designee)_____
VAA2-- ----f 0 /7
SUBJECT : Review of ECF-_4 7 ; Application No . :_ mG 719
Action Name :
bNC° , , /,' / if 0 ,,1,-
Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) :1450/ir
Note : Responses to be written in ink .
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : G I' ' `""`
1 ! SIGNIFICANT J l NON SIGNIFICANT
Comments :
ei
Signature of Di ector or Authorized Representative Uate
ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHLCKLIST FORMS
TO: J 'nance Department
Fire Department
Library Department
Park Department
Police Department
o Public Works Department
Building Div .
Engineering Div .
O T .affic Engineering Div .
f;;'.-- - tilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his
designee )
A Iar..66a6______ p_ //9lP
SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 7
D, ; Application No . : 4g--Ikeg-47
Action Name : A74/9/ etefe- 40M147k
Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) :
Note : Responses to be written in ink .
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :
SIGNIFICANT rNON SIGNIFICANT %' A"-``' /=.-K 'i'A'`` 'v .svf `
Comments : AL-0.c,,ay. i is JtiS:irccL--.)(eoC i2 At-' G)u//A_Jc.
6G44X /K'c-Z S /-ziK Lim../.. A.C- r
f
Sa G c--.Y .//t/C/ V rCA
w w G"X Si i.G ;rc,l
L
7 -
t 1 1-U--- J
Signature of Director r Au horized Representati e Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
i,Cnant ouP f
Department :!
SIGNIFICANT l NON SIGNIFICANT
Comments :
0,.,0 2 1/2j
Signature of Director .r Authorized Representative Date
PROFOSED/FINAL CLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCI DN-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No . SA-322-79 0 PROPOSED Declaration
Environmental Checklist No . ECF-440-79 0 FINAL Declaration
Description of proposal The applicant requests site approval for develop-
mentof an 18,900t square foot warehousesoffice facility in an M-P zone.
Proponent HOLMES ELECTRIC
Location of Proposal Vicinity of 1500 Raymond Avenue S.W.
Lead Agency Renton Planning Department__
This proposal has been determined to have ® not have a
significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is
pis not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) (c ) . This decision was
mae after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental
checklist and other information on file with the lead agency .
Reasons for declaration of environmental/significance : This
declarationdeclaration is based on the provision of suitable landscaping, screening, and
other development standards which reduce visual and other impacts of the
development and are consistent with M-P zone standards and Comprehensive Plan
objectives.
Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the
environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would
withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final )
declaration of non- significance :
Responsible Off ' ,ial Gordon Y. Ericksen
Ti tl e Pla ;ng Dirct r
faiawDate
March 28, 1979
Signaturef
City of Renton
Planning Department
5 -76
NDING
OF FILE
FILE TITLE
14/ 1 NI.
1
j. 227g