Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA79-406BEu'4Nkki OF FILE FILE TITLE MICROFILMED L- 0679 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3369 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G) TO P-1 PUBLIC (MEDICAL, HEALTH, FIRE AND EDUCATION DISTRICT R-405-79 (DR. ANDREW DEAK) WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton", as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classification District (G); and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Department on or about August 27, 1979, which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about September 18, 1979, and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to P-1 (Medical, Health, Fire and Education) District as hereinbelow specified; subject to the findings, conclusions and decision dated September 21, 1979; the Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. Said property being located at 4509 Talbot Road South at rear of existing clinic)) SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. r PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, this 5thday of Novembe1;979. oes MeadCrA. ity (.1 APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 5 th day of Novembe1979. c Charles J elaurenti, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. War n, City Attorney Date of Publication: November 9, 1979 EXHIBIT A" The West 75.00 feet of the East 300.00 feet of the North 133.00 feet of the portion of the S. 1/2 of the S. 1/2 of the N.E. 1/4 of section 31 , Township 23 N. Range 5 East, W. M. in King County, Washington, lying Westerly of the Kent-Renton Road. (Talbot Road South) i iSTALE@ tr.NO N.INEOF TNN sh VO' Me.tro OF THE so OF THE yryp.soi NEE`/E OF SEC. 3/-23-5 N88•5910A/' W 4RY TS.0o 22S. 00 lrr w R•tllS.00 t: 44 4.2•36'.1/' R. 2886, of 2 ( h.z /33.03 L• 301 .2yYs1 d 1/ V O r )i T. /?y. 3a. z: o 1 tax- ram; TS.Oo 22SAO A k- 3ET4*,SRrEBAle • N88•51'O4e"W 110,W CAP 00//TP6 As oce as as' i CTY19 it•2f2S.o 3 PC HOAi 1 88'S6'/s." L.i V I Renton City Council 10/15/79 Page 3 8:28 p.m. Councilwoman Shinpoch left the meeting because of personal illness. CONSENT AGENDA The Consent Agenda is adopted by one motion which follows the items included : Claim for Claim for Damages was filed by Christie Barrett for tire and Damages wheel damage allegedly caused by auto hitting chuck hole in area of Victoria Park, claiming $200 damages. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Fire Department Letter from Renton Fire Department Administrative Officers Officers requested update for 1980 Budget to include longevity same as Police Department or $2,566 for the three officers. Refer to Budget Committee. Citizen Federal Citizens Federal Savings and Loan Association, 1409 5th Ave. , Vacation of Seattle, petitioned for vacation of right-of-way between Right of Way NE Sunset Blvd. and Kirkland NE in the Renton Highlands. VAC-18-79 Refer to Public Works Dept. , Board of Public Works and Trans- portation Committee for verification of petition, determination re appraisal and easement retention ; to Ways and Means Committee for resolution setting date of 11/26/79 for public hearing. Deak Rezone Hearing Examiner's recommendation for Rezone No. 405-79 and Sight Approval No. 406-79 as requested by Dr. Andrew Deak for property located at 4509 Talbot Road S. at the rear of existing clinic from "G" to P-i for proposed parking lot. Examiner recommends approval with conditions. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for ordinance. Consent Agenda MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY, ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS Approval PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Betz Rezone Letter from Dobson, Houser and Dobson requested matter of appeal of Clinton H. Betz Rezone 400-79 be extended to 10/22/79. See earlier committee report Page 1 . Request granted. LID 314 Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason requested a temporary Loan Request loan from Street Forward Thrust to Design Engineering in the amount of $140,089.75 for purpose of paying Jones Associates, Inc. , consulting engineers for preliminary survey and design services in connection with creation of LID 314. The letter anticipated loan would be repaid prior to 12/31/79 from the interim financing to be obtained for LID 314; hearing scheduled 11/5/79 advanced from earlier date of 10/15/79. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PROCTOR REFER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Following discussion of means of funding , Councilman Stredicke requested from the Administration, a review of Street Foward Thrust Projects and funding. Six-Year Street Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason requested revision of Program Amendment the City's Six-Year Street Program and Transportation Improve- Request ment Program as requested by King County Planning Department as there are some mismatches between the two programs. The letter listed three changes : Shattuck Ave. S. , Puget and Benson, and SW 27th St. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND TRIMM, REFER TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PROCTOR, REFER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR DRAWING UP OF RESOLUTIONS SETTING HEARING DATE. CARRIED. Public Meeting Letter from Public Works Director recommended a public meeting Grady Way Bridge be called 10/22/79 on the Grady Way Bridge replacement and noted 10/22/79 Public Works Department is prepared to make presentation on the alternate alignments. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND TRIMM, CONCUR IN REQUEST AND SET PUBLIC MEETING 10/22/79. CARRIED. Renton City Council 10/15/79 Page 4 NEW BUSINESS Watermain Councilman Stredicke requested information from the Public Installation Works Director concerning review of road conditions between Meadow Ave. N. Park Ave. N. and Meadow Ave. N. , North of 36th. Information requested concerned identification of dedicated right-of-way and improved right-of-way and occupancy permits in that area. See earlier bid award Page 1 . ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND TRIMM, COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. Delores A. Mead', C.M. . City Clerk OF R4,11, THE CITY OF RENTON if © z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 oIMMO CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER O FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0ltED SEPt'=, 0 October 8, 1979 Mr. Gary Scott 6000 Southcenter Blvd. , Suite 250 Seattle, WA 98188 RE: File No. R-405-79, SA-406-79; Dr. Andrew Deak. Dear Mr. Scott: This is to notify you that the above referenced requests, which were apprcved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of September 21, 1979, have not been appealed within the time period estatlished by ordinance. Therefore, this application is being submitted to the City Clerk for transmittal to the City Council for final approval. You sill receive notification of final approval upon adoption of an ordirance by the City Council. Sincerely, Fred J. Kau an Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) Co snty of King Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 21st day of September 1979 , of f iant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this ,--N:\ - day of 19 --t \ . Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Pent6h Application, Petition or Case: Dr. Andrew Deak; R-405-79, SA-406-79 Tire m%nutee contain a £i.e.t o'S the pan.ti,ee oti necond) September 21, 1979 OFOEO_THE LAND LSE HEARING F,XAt"INER CITY OF RENT Off REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: Dr. Andrew Deak FILE NO. R-405-79, SA-406-79 LOCATION: 4509 Talbot Road South (at rear of existing clinic) SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks a rezone from "G" to P-1 and site approval for a proposed parking lot on property situated adjacent to an existing medical facility. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval with conditions. RECOMMENDATIO:4: Hearing Examiner: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DEPA:2TMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on September 13, 1979. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on September 18, 1979 at 11:40 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Roger Blayloc)., Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map Exhibit #3: Special Permit previously issued for the subject site, File No. SP-287-79 by reference) Referencing Section L.3 (Special Permit) of Exhibit #1 pertaining to submittal of sewer, water and storm drainage plans to the Public Works Department for review and approval, Mr. Blaylock advised that although specific plans have been submitted, final approval has not been issued to his knowledge. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Gary Scott 6000 Southcenter Blvd. , Suite 250 Seattle, WA 98188 Mr. Scott indicated concurrence in the recommendations contained in Exhibit #1 with the exception of section L.4 (Special Permit) which requires a 15-foot landscape buffer along the southerly and westerly borders of the site. He advised that the surrounding area is currently undeveloped and he understands that plans for development for commercial use is proposed by property owners. Mr. Blaylock indicated that because the property to the west and south of the site is zoned "G", and commercial use is not designated on the Comprehensive Plan for the area, it is the opir,ion of the Planning Department that the landscape buffer should be required to screen the proposal from potential residential development. The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the application. There was no response. Since there were no further comments, the hearing regarding File No. R-405-79 and SA-406-79 was closed by the Examiner at 11:55 a.m. R-405-79 Page Two FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a rezone of +9,900 square feet from G (General) lassification to P-1 (Public) classification together with a request for site pproval to establish a parking lot on the site. 2. he Planning Department report sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, indings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, is uncontested, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, R.C.W. 43.21.C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. 411 existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. 'i'he proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, lot coverage and height requirements of Section 4-710 (Public) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances. 8. The subject site was annexed into the city in 1968. The G classification was applied at the time the area was annexed. The adjoining lot was rezoned by the Council and a special permit to construct a medical clinic was approved in early 1979 (File No. R-286-79 and SP-287-79) . 9. IThe site slopes downward from east to west at about a 10% grade. The undeveloped site contains some small shrubs and a few evergreen trees. 10. ' he subject site is in the vicinity of the Valley General Hospital and the area is developed with a number of medical and professional clinics. There are some scattered Single family homes in the area. 11. The applicant proposes to develop an expanded dermatology clinic on the adjoining lot and an associated parking area on the subject site to provide adequate parking. 12. I'he Planning Department recommended that the rezone and the special permit be issued with the condition that the area be adequately landscaped. The applicant requested that the landscaping be omitted because of the distance between the subject site and the nearest residential units. The distance was not specified. The Fire Department indicated that road grades should be limited to less than 15% for emergency access on the site. 13. The Comprehensive Plan for the area in which the subject site is located designates the area as potentially suited for public development. 14. The area to the west, south and east of the subject site is zoned G and is developed with scattered single family housing. The Comprehensive Plan indicates that these areas are potentially zoned for single family development. 15. An R-3 district lies just north of the subject site along S. 43rd Street. 4', CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate compliance with at least one of the criteria of Section 4-3014, which provides in part that: a. The site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone; a b. The site is potentially zoned for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan and conditions indicate that the change would be appropriate; or c. There have been significant and material changes in the area indicating the change is appropriate. I R-405-79 Page Three The applicant has demonstrated that the circumstances are appropriate for the requested change. The area in which the subject property is located is the site of Valley General Hospital and a large array of medical clinics established in a rather extensive P-1 zone. Most of this development is of recent occurrence. 2. The adjoining lot was rezoned to P-1 in early 1979 to permit the expansion of an existing dermotology clinic. The site plan for that project was approved. The applicant has proposed to provide expanded parking facilities to adequately serve the previously approved clinic. The proposed use of the subject property as a parking area will not have a negative effect on the neighboring properties when it is effectively screened by appropriate landscaping. 3. The plan3 comply with the necessary criteria of the Parking and Loading Ordinance, Chapter 22 of the Renton Municipal Code. 4. The requested exception to the landscape requirements would be inappropriate since the adjoining property to the south is presently zoned for residential use and is developed in that use. The potential for further residential subdivision is probable and these properties should be effectively screened from the more intense use the ,applicant is establishing, especially a parking lot. In addit _on, the property to the south is designated in the Comprehensive Plan for single family use and the probable change of zoning of this adjoining property to a more intense use must be ruled out for the present. 5. Road grades developed on the property should be limited to less than 15% per the recommendation of the Fire Department so that adequate emergency access is possible. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should approve the requested rezone subject to: 1. Installation of landscaping approved by the Planning Department which is to be integrated into the landscaping of the adjoining clinic parcel which is being developed by the applicant. 2. Development of all roads on the subject site should be less than a 15% grade. The site approval is granted subject to approval of the rezone request. ORDERED THIS 21st day of September, 1979. Fred J. fman Land Use aring Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 21st day of September 1979 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Dr. Andrew Deak, 4509 Talbot Road S. , Renton, WA 98055 Gary Scott, 6000 Southcenter Blvd. , Suite 250, Seattle, WA 98188 TRANSMITTED THIS 21st day of September, 1979 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Michael Hanis, Planning Commission Chairman Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before October 5, 1979. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen 14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. I T. R-405-79 Page Four An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that' such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meet.ng other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for insp ction in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said department. s I r f• T. . , ,.,-41 -1` r 7 •r a 7Mr? : 1. ca4k . 41 1 IM . . •, M NN • e » " VV6O, , 1. C— - r jiii a:y M • so '• . r .•:; • .• 1 . • •• S. ••'• el. 1 IA 1 F-0 I 1 . •'_ 'titM • IrNI 40•...1.i•••••lk4111.i:... e..•.e.•......._•«•...III.•.. .._ . .r.,...._. ZON 1 I IG I r j I pil%iSU83&-c IT Y Lit 1 s1 r 1 . 1 IL I11 I • i 1 A.... ••.... s. ._ •• 1• iw.ra a.... sy 1•,..•....•me...a ' DR. ANDREW DEAK File Nos : R-405-79 , SA-406-79 S.'a..Y •.'"wr rw••••••.r a...w....rr••••••••rr_w AMr.— -•— wl r'w• ws.. f,l'L t , AN t DR.+ ANDREW DEAK __ TOTAL AREA ±9,900 sq. feet I: I n. ; I ,,\t M ( 1 ti`, - Y Via Talbot Road South x 151 i Nti {i,E•----- ._-. - Undeveloped .--- ---------- t' i {,1[ _— Parking lot— for adjacent medical clinic — i,*tfli.tNlN`rtVf LAND US PLAN -- Public/Quasi-Public PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING SEPTEMBER 18, 1979 APPLICANT: DR. ANDREW DEAK FILE NUMBER: R-405-79, SA-406-79 A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks a rezone from "G" to P-i and site approval for a proposed parking lot on property situated adjacent to an existing medical facility. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: RICHARD THOMAS , DEAN M. & FRANCES A. ROCKEY 2. Applicant : DR. ANDREW DEAK 3. Location : 4509 Talbot Road South (at rear Vicinity Map Attached) of existing clinic) 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5. Size of Property : 9,900 square feet 6. Access : Via Talbot Road South 7. Existing Zoning:G" , General Classification District , minimum lot size 35,000 square feet 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: R-3, Residential Multiple Family ; "G" , General Classifi- cation District ; P-1, Public Uses 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Public/Quasi-Public 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on September 7, 1979 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on September 6 , 1979. C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #2394 dated March 26 , 1968. A rezone and special permit to construct a medical clinic on the note were approved by the Hearing Examiner on February 22 , 1979. D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The site slopes downward from east to west at just under a 10% slope. PJANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: DR. ANDREW DEAK, FILE NO: R-405-79, SA-406-79 SEPTEMBER 18, 1979 PAGE TWO 2. Soils : Alderwood (AgC) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil . Runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is moderate . This soil is used for timber, pasture, row crops , and urban development . 3. Some small shrubs and a few evergreen trees are found on the subject site . 4. Existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals. 5. Water: No water was evidenced on the subject site (September 6, 1979) . 6. Land Use : The subject site is undeveloped at this time. E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The surrounding area is developed into a medical-professional complex with some scattered single family residences on the fringes. F. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer: A 12" water main extends north-south on Talbot Road South adjacent to the subject site . An 8" sanitary sewer is located on Talbot Road approximately 100' north of the subject site . 2 . Provided by the Renton Fire Department per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit : Metro Transit Route #145 operates along S .W. 43rd Street within 1/8 of a mile to the north of the subject site. 4. Schools : The subject site is not in close proximity to any existing schools and the proposed project will not have an effect on existing schools. 5. Recreation : The subject site is slightly over one mile south of Talbot Hill Park. In addition , the grounds of Valley General Hospital may provide some recreational opportunities. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-29, G, General Classification District . 2. Section 4-710 , P-1, Public District . H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT : 1. Policy Statement , Comprehensive Plan, Renton Urban Area, 1965 , Summary , Pages 9 and 10. 2. Land Use Report , 1965 , Objectives , Pages 17 and 18. I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1 . Natural Systems : Development of the site will disturb soil and vegetation , increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area. However, through proper development controls and procedures , these impacts can be mitigated. 2. Population/Employment : Not Applicable . 3. Schools : Not Applicable. 4. Social : Not Applicable . 5. Traffic : The proposed parking lot will allow the use of the 1st ti PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: DR. ANDREW DEAK, FILE NO : R--405-79, SA-406-79 SEPTEMBER 18, 1979 PAGE THREE floor of the new clinic which can be used for offices. This would generate approximately 260 vehicle trips daily (75. 0 per 1 ,000 square feet ) . J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton 's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, RCW 43-21C, the responsible official has issued a declaration of non-significance for the subject proposal. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2. City of Renton Engineering Division . 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4. City of Renton Utilities Division . 5. City of Renton Fire Department . L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : (Rezone) 1. The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use element which designates the site as public/quasi-public. 2 . The proposed rezoning is requested to permit usage (of property adjoining an existing medical clinic) for parking purposes. The requested P-1 zoning would permit such use of the subject site under a site approval application which is also part of this request . 3. The subject site is immediately west and adjacent to property owned by the applicant which was rezoned to P-1 in February of this year. As noted in C-HISTORY/BACKGROUND, a special permit was also granted for enlarging the existing clinic. 4. Given the fact that the applicant ' s previous applications have been approved and that the proposed use would enhance use of the clinic and help alleviate traffic congestion in the general area, it would appear to be a reasonable request . 5. An appropriate landscape/screening buffer should be required to separate the proposed parking area from the single family zoned property to the south and west . Details of this can be addressed in the accompanying site approval application. 6. Items L-3 and L-4 appear to provide ample justification for a rezone given the criteria outlines in Sections 4-3014-B and 4-3014-C of the Land Use Hearing Examiner Ordinance . M. DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS (Rezone) : Based on the foregoing analysis , recommend approval of the proposed rezone as being compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and adjacent medical clinic development and subject to the following: 1. Provision of a sight obscuring landscape buffer along the south and west property line to screen off the parking area from the adjacent single family property. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: DR. ANDREW DEAK, File No : R-405-79, SA-406-79 SEPTEMBER 18, 1979 PAGE FOUR L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS (Special Permit ) : 1. The proposed parking layout contained in this application is consistent with the requirements of the Parking and Loading Ordinance , Chapter 22 of the Renton Municipal Code. 2. Approval of this request will insure that ample parking and maneuvering space are provided for the clinic uses adjacent to the east and approved in SP-287-79. 3 . Suitable utilities are available to the subject site . However , sewer and water plans along with storm drainage plans should be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval. 4. In SP-287-79 the Hearing Examiner required a 15-foot landscape buffer along the southerly edge of the property adjacent to the east . However, 10 feet of the 15-foot width is reserved for a sewer and water easement . It does not appear that the sewer and water easement extends into the subject site . If this is the case, then the 15-foot landscape buffer should be required along the southerly and westerly borders of the site to serve as an effective screen for the adjacent "G" zoned parcels . 5. The landscape plan submitted with the building permit application was not approved. A new landscape plan was required prior to occupancy . The landscape area around the parking lot as stated in L-4 should be included in that landscape plan. DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS (Special Permit ) : Based upon the above analysis , the staff recommends approval of the request for parking only with landscaping of all areas of the site not paved, subject to the approval of detailed landscaping plans by the Planning Department prior to installation of landscape materials and the occupancy of the clinic on the parcel immediately to the east . Y ' ' rT • -il , `'--1 ! '` C rI1 10 ... iLeliP . I — " _6:.'. 1. ..,—..._1_ : t.7 1 i ...i • .. N /1M IfM NI1f14IY'!. .e 60, r i 4;11r rO•__.+ •• t -. t - L....;. r I f .1+ . II_ _ I ii 1 M a Y •• '8 r• ••. ` •• .0 I r • ! re,M M.•• •. l I' r D l L L 1 '1 f rI i I s • II 0 it) I 14 C1Yy1pa., I 1` 1 " ' ItM 1.t I al • t fi 11 1 , L.I 1 L Ai°e oi. Lt .a1II a• + + •a•Ew a o w•a.a•..-.. • • - . ti •Ma —• •1•—... r a J 3N ZOON It, e pc ij II 1 O gsg-cr I. C I T Y Lit 61 r 1 1 . IL 1I I 11 I 1 DR. ANDREW DEAK t File Nos : R-405-79, SA-406-79 p Nay 1021•7•10 1 APPLICANTDR. ANDREW DEAK TOTAL AREA +9,900 sq. feet i PRINc. hrAL A(C L' Via Talbot Road South _ r. x I S1 I rlG ZONING_ R-3, G, P-1 t_ xIST ING USE Undeveloped ri I;i)!'05Ll) USE: Parking lot for adjacent medical clinic _ — f! COh1Pkt.HLNS I VE LAND USE PLAN Public/Quasi-Public COMMENTS 1 ISSM/MMI011/0007.::1... 6 i•ttlw-. --wow•-•,..l AA1.-r,.:••r_1•NA.••..•..a--. .+ a-•.r vn -cs•rnvor•••w•a on,•.a•v.....?MISJ::::.r..-17J1=77:fs l ral[T3.=::-a..ra- r. a=r-aranma-s:. VEL'JPVEN 1 APPLICATION REV a,..,J SHEET Application ;_41eZeA_c_tfic rZif ova/ (5ii-v06-74 Location : Oie ia;*ty 9_ Ta /6pf /ode S Appl i cant :_j)ft.j Dr. i4Adrr TO :___,Parks Department 1 SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 'ppPoliceDepartmentA. R. C. MEETING SPublicWorksDepartment Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering tire Departoiont FWNERFOITAPOORRIPOSANRIMAgiliIfTISAAOPSHOT! DEEDttpp{{LLTTII + LpppRR0 I DIE4dCONFENCE (ARC) TO E HE, AT 9:0OCONE N";, I Y71?A TMENTlDIVISION REPRESENTATIVEAM IN THE THIRD FL00 ERE ICE ATT N THE PLEAS PRO THE COMMENTS70T WILL NOT BgABLE TO Y 5:SO PM ONHE LANNING EPARTMENT REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: POLICE xxxxxApproved The parkin Aporoyed with conditio P Not A rov dg"'t-ot c ou not ave any a ect an—the police dept.and appears to fit in with the general character of the area. Plustheadditionalparkingisneededfortheclinic. j2.D.R. I'ersson 9/5/79 S' ignature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved Approved with conditions Not Ap proved Signature of Director or Authorized'Representative Date r •• • PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NON—SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-405-79, SA-406-79 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . 496_79 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Rezone from "G" to P-1 and site approval for a proposed parking lot on property situated adjacent to an existing medical facility. Proponent DR. ANDREW DEAK Location of Proposal 4509 Talbot Road South Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to have ® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . non Reasons for declaration of environmental /significance : The declaration of non-significance is subject to approval of landscape plan to protect adjacent properties. The proposed parking lot has minor impact and incorporates landscaping and screening. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Of ' iccial GORDON Y. ERICKSEN Title P ' I I DI ,E O• / Y. Date SEPTEMBER 12 , 1979 Sign . iL/ ii L.[• l City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 At CITY OF RENTON y J`aECFIV. APPLICATION AUG 27 go SITE APPROVAL a FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 9 L4 File No . SA- U6'79 Filing Date NG DEPN" 7/ i Application Fee $ / ' 'Receipt No . 'c' Environmental Review Fee $ // APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1 . Name Dr. Andrew Deak Phone 575-0974 Address 4509 Talbot Road , Renton, WA. 98055 2 . Property location Adjoining above addressed property on west side 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) The West 75 feet of the East 312 feet more or less of the North 133 feet of the South 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 lying Westerly of Kent Renton Road, in Section 31, Township 23 North, Range 5 East , W.M. 4. Number of acres or square feet 9 , 900 sq. ft. Present zoning 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? Parking lot for adjoining medical facility. 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) 7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION : Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks Planning Dept. Rev, 1-77 AFFIDAVIT Richard Lomas (a single man) and we We A, Dean M. and Frances A.Rockey Husb/Wife , being duly sworn, declare that )X are am the ownersof the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of our my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this '; ,4,c day of (4el<< 19-t7 , p e--6-c-i-e----n-- ture of Owner) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing a 4j2_,ca_es_)tii.1 , 1 A /` Xi/ / fiec Adds s) Nk t4 3X f Name of Notary ublic) Signature of Owner) M/.-"\!18 . D / ` .v? dd C.E',c Address) Address)91cc City) State) Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify tha egoing application has been inspected by me and has been found t , 1 ho&2 and complete in every particular and to conform to the rule 4amid sa of the Renton Planning Department governing the fili f p.a tion . 2 Date Received AUG 27 1979 19 B y: to9,y 2 A. WA, tets Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON Re ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM6 ALC F1!Eo C AUG 27 1979 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY eev Application No. 9&5—77. - e./06-77 s4, DEPP Environmental Checklist No. 7 le— 79 PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: Declarat on of Significance O Declaration of Significance QDeclarat on of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared fo- all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include yourexplanationinthespaceprovided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed , even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply , just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent Andrew Deak, M.D. 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: Valley Dermatology Clinic, 4509 Talbot Ro_ad South . Renton, Wa, . 98055 Ph. 228-4520 3. Date Checklist submitted August 13, 1979. 4. Agency requiring Checklist Renton Planning Commission 5. flame of proposal , if applicable: Proposal obtaining a piece of property to be used for additional Parking inMedicalCTinic. 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : EXHIBIT "A" The property is legally decrrihPd ac fnllowclThp ides-t_75 feet of the East 312 feet more or less of the North 133 feet of the South 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 lying Westerly of Kent Renton Road, in Section 31, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. Continued from Question No. 7 is currently used fortheouthendof parking To the Southad 'or this a 60JWingpropertpropertyandanyadjoininereis foot easementr y contains a barn where farm g pr0perty. At the currentoad betweenanyotherinformatTalr.neru= ,animals are kept_ time, thatmentalsettingoftheproposal ) : This is a parcel of property 75 feet adjoining the Western portion of the current Valley Dermatology Clinic. It also adjoins a 5 acre parcel of landwhichisnowzoned "G". There are no homes within several hundred feet ofthisparticularproperty. There are buildings tothe North and South with acommercialbuildingtotheNorthwlcaspropertyadjoiningthisproperty which8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : Con. on insert)September 1979. 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposalfederal . state and local --including rezones) : Special permit will be applied for to build a parking lot as soon as the rezone is obtained. 0. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activityrelatedtoorconnectedwiththisproposal ? If yes , explain: The only plan is to use this property for parking only. I1 . Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered byyourproposal ? If yes , explain : No 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some futuredate, describe the nature of such application form: See attached engineering diagram which shows the property added plus the propnsPri drainage recomme etl by John ssoci-a-tes Engineers. II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanatins of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologicsubstructures? TES— MAYBE NO b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil ? X YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relieffeatures? X TC3- wrir t NO d) The destruction, covering or modification of anyuniquegeologicorphysicalfeatures? YES MAYBE NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils . either on or off the site? VET— MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , orchangesinsiltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or thebedoftheoceanoranybay, inlet or lake? Explanation: ITEM (C) might result in very sliiht changes YES MAYBE in topography to insure that the drainage is toward the various catch basins on the property and no water will leave the property. 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in : a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? Y - MAYBE N) b) The creation of objectionable odors? V MAYBE (D c) Alteration of ai.r movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate , either locally or regionally? xx Yrs MAYBE N"0 Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? Y—E- MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YES MAYBE WU— c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYS NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X fS MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES MAYBE WU— f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria , or other substances into the ground waters? X Tar— MBE TO— i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X Y MAYBE W Explanation: 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants )? X YES - MAYB€ NU— b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? X V!T M7(YB E NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species?X Y MTV`er NO d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X Trf- RPM Al- L12lanation: Once the parking lot is done, there is a proposal to put appropriate trees and flora surrounding the parking facility. 4- 5) fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers ofanyspeciesoffauna (birds , land animals includingreptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms ,insects or microfauna)? yyYTSMAYBEND b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna?X YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movementoffauna? YES MAYBE d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X VE I— MAYBE NU-- Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light orglare? Yl MAYBE Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of thepresentorplannedlanduseofanarea? X YES— MAYBE Nb Explanation: Currently, the land use is G. The property is not being used for any reason and this would be used as a parking lot. 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? yy YES MAYBE N'0 b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X YES MAYBE N-0-- Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an exp os on or the release of hazardous substances (including,but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation)in the event of an accident or upset conditions? r yr MAYBE KO Explanation: 11 ) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-but-Ton, density, or growth rate of the human populationofanarea? Yr Explanation: 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? VET— MAYBENO Explanation; _ 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result In: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? YES WGYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking?X YET- WIFE No c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?X yrs— MAYar NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X VES MAYBE l- e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X r MAYBE W — Explanatlon: _Since the parking lot is designed to accomodate any overflow from the existing clinic and pnscihly a permit is to utilize the hacement of the new clinic being built, in that _regardthere will be some slight increase in traffic but it is not felt to be prohibitive. 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) fire protection?yy YES MAYBE NU— t ) Police protection? X YES MAYBE Ht6— c ) Schools? YES MAYBE N(( t) Parks or other recreational facilities?X YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? YES MYBE NO Explanation: Additional fire hydrants are being installed under the currently owned piece of property and since t_ here will he no huildingc on this addition, I don't think it would represent a significant fire protection problem. 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YES M)Y WO— t) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X YET— MAYBE ii15— Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE tr t) Communications systems? YES WrViir NO c) Water? X YLS MAYBE NO 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES MAYBE N e) Storm wat,:r drainage? YeS RATITE WCE f) Solid waste and disposal? X M YBE NO Explanation: See attached engineering diagram to show the runoff patterns of the water. 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X PET MAYBE A5 Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public , or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? yy TES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YE- MAYBE NO Explanation; 20) Archeological Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? X YES MAYBE N`b— Explanation: III . SI NATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- mion of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should th' re be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full/ disclosure on my part. Proponent: // 1:e7/!(-,J`l C_ signed) Andrew Deak, M.D. name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-i OF I A.o THE CITY OF RENTON U y © Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH. 90055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI• MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235— 2550 l' Eo SEPcE. September 6 , 1979 Dr. Andrew Deak 4509 Talbot Road Renton , WA 98055 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATIONS FOR REZONE FROM G TO P-1, File R-405-79 , AND SITE APPROVAL TO DEVELOP PARKING LOT IN P-1 ZONE FOR ADJOINING MEDICAL FACILITY; property located at 4509 Talbot Road South Dear Dr. Deak : The Renton Planning Department flrmally accepted the above mentioned application on August 27, 1979 A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for September 18 . 1979 at 9:00 a.rn. • Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director By :e . J.--rAv.) f! Roger J . Blaylock , Associate Planner cc : John R. Ewing and Associates 622 S. Central Kent , WA 98031 THIS PROPERTY GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4509 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A DETAILED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE ON FILE IN THE FENTA PLANNING DEPT. I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING ON SEPTEMBER 18, 1979 BEGINNING AT 9 :00 AM A.M. P.M. CONCERNING ITEM [ S REZONE III,PECIAL PERMIT SITEAPPROVALFOR PARKING LOT IN P-1 ZONE, FILE SA-406-7 WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT H FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON SEPTEMBER 18 19 79 , AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION-. 1 . KOHL AND CHRISTIANSON ADDITION , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R-1 TO R-3 , File R-392-79 ; property located on S. W. Sunset Blvd ( SR-900) between 80th Ave. So. and S . W . 3rd P1 . ( 81st Ave . So. ) . 2. KOHL AND CHRISTIANSON ADDITION , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT PROFESSIONAL OFFICE IN R-3 ZONE , File SP-407-79 ; property located on S. W. Sunset Blvd ( SR-900) between 80th Ave . So. , and S .W. 3rd P1 . (81st Ave. So . ) 3 . IRVING W. HULL , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R-3 TO R-4 , File R-394-79 ; property located at 421 Burnett Ave. So. 4. DR. ANDREW DEAK, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO P- 1 , File R-405-79 ; property located at 4509 Talbot Rd . So . 5 . DR. ANDREW DEAK, APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO DEVELOP PARKING LOT IN P- 1 ZONE FOR PARKING LOT FOR ADJOINING MEDICAL FACILITY , File SA-406-79 ; property located at 4509 Talbot Rd . So. 6 . BILL HEATH , APPLICATION FOR FOUR-LOT SHORT PLAT APPROVAL , File 401-79 , AND APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING STREET WIDTH AND CONSTRUCTION OF CURBS AND SIDEWALKS , File E-408-79 ; property located in the vicinity of 1303 N . 26th St . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 183__1979 AT 9 : 00 A . M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED _5eptember 7 , 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , STEVE MUNSON HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES CF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN T.iREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to befo:'e rne, a Notary Public , jthe5thua,y of Sept. 1979 SIGNED 0 4 • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING SEPTEMBER 18, 1979 APPLICANT: DR. ANDREW DEAK FILE NUMBER: R-405-79, SA-406-79 A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks a rezone from "G" to P-1 and site approval for a proposed parking lot on property situated adjacent to an existing medical facility. B. GENERAL INFORMATION : 1. Owner of Record: RICHARD THOMAS , DEAN M. & FRANCES A. ROCKEY 2. Applicant : DR. ANDREW DEAK 3. Location : 4509 Talbot Road South (at rearVicinityMapAttached) of existing clinic) 4. Legal Description : • A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5. Size of Property : 9,900 square feet 6. Access : Via Talbot Road South 7. Existing Zoning:G" , General Classification District , minimum lot size 35,000 square feet 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: R-3, Residential Multiple Family; "G" , General Classifi- cation District ; P-1, Public Uses 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Public/Quasi-Public 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on September 7, 1979 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on September 6 , 1979. C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #2394 dated March 26 , 1968. A rezone and special permit to construct a medical clinic on the note were approved by the Hearing Examiner on February 22, 1979. D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1. Topography : The site slopes downward from east to west at just under a 10% slope. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: DR. ANDREW DEAK, FILE. NO: R-405-79 , SA-406-79 S :PTEMBER 18, 1979 PAGE TWO 2. Soils : Alderwood (AgC) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil . Runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is moderate . This soil is used for timber, pasture , row crops , and urban development . 3. Some small shrubs and a few evergreen trees are found on the subject site. 4. Existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals. 5. Water: No water was evidenced on the subject site (September 6 , 1979) . 6. Land Use : The subject site is undeveloped at this time. E NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The surrounding area is developed into a medical-professional complex with some scattered single family residences on the fringes. F. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : A 12" water main extends north-south on Talbot Road South adjacent to the subject site . An 8" sanitary sewer is located on Talbot Road approximately 100' north of the subject site . 2 . Provided by the Renton Fire Department per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit : Metro Transit Route #145 operates along S.W. 43rd Street within 1/8 of a mile to the north of the subject site. 4. Schools : The subject site is not in close proximity to any existing schools and the proposed project will not have an effect on existing schools. 5. Recreation : The subject site is slightly over one mile south of Talbot Hill Park. In addition , the grounds of Valley General Hospital may provide some recreational opportunities. e , APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-829, G, General Classification District . 2. Section 4-710 , P-1, Public District . E . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Policy Statement , Comprehensive Plan, Renton Urban Area,. 1965 , Summary , Pages 9 and 10. 2. Land Use Report , 1965 , Objectives , Pages 17 and 18. I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1 . Natural Systems : Development of the site will disturb soil and vegetation , increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area. However, through proper development controls and procedures , these impacts can be mitigated. 2. Population/Employment : Not Applicable . 3. Schools : Not Applicable. 4. Social : Not Applicable . 5. Traffic : The proposed parking lot will allow the use of the 1st PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: DR. ANDREW DEAK, FILE NO: R.-405-79, SA-406-79SEPTEMBER18, 1979 PAGE THREE floor of the new clinic which can be used for offices. Thiswouldgenerateapproximately260vehicletripsdaily (75. 0 per1 ,000 square feet) . J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and theStateEnvironmentalPolicyActof1971 , as amended, RCW 43-21C, the responsible official has issued a declaration of non-significanceforthesubjectproposal . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building Division. 2. City of Renton Engineering Division . 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division .4. City of Renton Utilities Division . 5. City of Renton Fire Department . L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : (Rezone) 1 . The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use element which designates the site as public/quasi-public. 2 . The proposed rezoning is requested to permit usage (of property adjoining an existing medical clinic) for parking purposes. The requested P-1 zoning would permit such use of the subject site under a site approval application which is also part of this request 3. The subject site is immediately west and adjacent to property owned by the applicant which was rezoned to P-1 in February ofthisyear, As noted in C-HISTORY/BACKGROUND, a special permit was also granted for enlarging the existing clinic. 4. Given the fact that the applicant ' s previous applications have been approved and that the proposed use would enhance use of the clinic and help alleviate traffic congestion in the general area, it would appear to be a reasonable request . 5. An appropriate landscape/screening buffer should be required to separate the proposed parking area from the single familyzonedpropertytothesouthandwest . Details of this can be addressed in the accompanying site approval application. 6. Items L-3 and L-4 appear to provide ample justification for a rezone given the criteria outlines in Sections 4-3014-B and 4-3014-C of the Land Use Hearing Examiner Ordinance. M. DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS (Rezone) : Based on the foregoing analysis , recommend approval of the proposed rezone as being compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and adjacent medical clinic development and subject to the following: 1. Provision of a sight obscuring landscape buffer along the south and west property line to screen off the parking area from the adjacent single family property. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: DR. ANDREW DEAK, File No : R-405-79, SA-406-79 EPTEMBER 18, 1979 AGE FOUR PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS (Special Permit) : 1. The proposed parking layout contained in this application is consistent with the requirements of the Parking and Loading Ordinance , Chapter 22 of the Renton Municipal Code. 2 . Approval of this request will insure that ample parking and maneuvering space are provided for the clinic uses adjacent to the east and approved in SP-287-79. 3. Suitable utilities are available to the subject site . However , sewer and water plans along with storm drainage plans should be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval. 4. In SP-287-79 the Hearing Examiner required a 15-foot landscape buffer along the southerly edge of the property adjacent to the east . However, 10 feet of the 15-foot width is reserved for a sewer and water easement . It does not appear that the sewer and water easement extends into the subject site . If this is the case, then the 15-foot landscape buffer should be required along the southerly and westerly borders of the site to serve as an effective screen for the adjacent "G" zoned parcels . 5. The landscape plan submitted with the building permit application was not approved. A new landscape plan was required prior to occupancy . The landscape area around the parking lot as stated in L-4 should be included in that landscape plan. M. DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS (Special Permit) : Based upon the above analysis , the staff recommends approval of the request for parking only with landscaping of all areas of the site not paved, subject to the approval of detailed landscaping plans by the Planning Department prior to installation of landscape materials and the occupancy of the clinic on the parcel immediately to the east . Ni:p• •, se 1 J l . — S. • I11 I r t• 1...• I ± Si •• • SS HI• • IS •1 •• .I L.. ' f 4 I t}t •-y r I M l i L L fir,L. " •• •.i J_ n I R•qM w IN \ T I I wL, MI M I I I iri" f tr.tit a\ . r / ry• F— I 1. lI Lt I. r ; I II ea.•s.Oi1r.A•iY•i a.a+a•s.A•o.s a - a•-ea•• ea•_ :..:.. .• q•. ••• i i I P. 1111•13 i Z0N i d p. I I p„ I I r . 1 I [1 v,U63.,.-.,T crr Lr 1 61TE. 1 IL a 1 I • 1 1 I ' 1 I i I r.r•a.. -• T• a•:.run.M4a_-..—r.r_.a•....ris A l+v' xs.:raY st/w/mt'L:xR' DR. ANDREW DEAK File Nos : R-405-79, SA-406-79 APPLICANT DR. ANDREW DEAK TOTAL AREA +9,900 sq. feet PR INi. I r AL AC(t,k,S Via Talbot Road South ExIS11N6 Zt'NING R-3, G, P-1 __ ,__ t L x I ST I NG USE___ _ r Undeveloped t'ROpOsLI) USE Parking lot for adjacent medical clinic Public/Quasi-Public 1 COMPPLNLNS I VE LAND USE PLAN i COMMENTS y 1 r«r•V•noss•maw 1.rva:.vw1•••:.':=r.'?l!l.1C2><.yti7i/'aS'.:-a y F:4,Sl:Slf.:.L' ALL+JNPhN l APPLICATION RE' ' SHEET Application : ReZQ&c.1J6 "Y045"!7q1 .tr Vpt a S)AC 3 t 'Go to V4A Q-1. Sty fr:av I ir: a ..h jil Location :_likiaLivot295_405ZsMat- Act 5_ Applicant : Do o a Sot d rek) ---- TO ;___,Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 90/794!Police Department A. R. C. MEETING 9/7/79 Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering tire Department T4prEATAPOEIRMINAWRIMA01.8SA 'AOPNOl! VppLLIITTii + sLpppRR0 IDD DCOFERNCE (ARC) TO V HE D 0AT :00W. PATMENTIDIVIS 0 AM IN THE THIRD FL00 CONrERENCE ATT N THE PLEAS PRO THE COMMENTSTTOITHEVE WPLANNINILLNOT B ABLE ETONBY5:SD PM ON ?I4 it1It PLANNING BE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: POLICE xx"'{gpproved Apwroy d with conditionsNotparking—tot would not ve any ettect an—the police aept.and appears to fit in with the general character of the area. Plustheadditionalparkingisneededfortheclinic. J 4:( J2.D.R.` ersson 9/5/79 Signature of Director or Authorized Representatives - = Date RE VIEtJING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NON—SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-405-79 , SA-406-79 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . 496-79 E] FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Rezone from "G" to P-1 and site approval for a proposed parking lot on property situated adjacent to an existing medical facility. Proponent DR. ANDREW DEAK Location of Proposal 4509 Talbot Road South Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not have a si nificant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . non Reasons for declaration of environmental /significance : The declaration of non-significance is subject to approval of landscape plan to protect adjacent properties . The proposed parking lot has minor impact and incorporates landscaping and screening. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non- significance : Responsible Of icial GORDON Y. ERICKSEN Title P I /4IDI ;E O t Date SEPTEMBER 12 , 1979 Sign . • - City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 I,. t G9 600 1_73S, ! . 111 r 14.1111. I 1 9 I i i ' 1 fp.= ,q1 . i I 1...,• .-' - 2. 0 R TI-4s ll'" J I1 i........ ,,.-•'-'''''1 t R..3 1 4 1 1... .LA . / 2e) • 1 I i f I t.Z.5-ai. 0 I II 1— I1 i I i 1 1IIi I I 1 s i r,.. ,1, elsewezit i r*„..1 .I 1 r I Ni 1' I I' o 6 1 H---,:1 q: i k. 1 I 1 I I 4 • 1 i 1.I - ''• . 4 . , . .! I r . 44-'.-- 4 t LlINI • ICc)ic2.--- i.,......,„.1, :: 1 :,‘ f xien..46--,-., . -.4. Asorne--••••9"....* i .,,..r.,..../- r..,..• tr .11A%1' I ' A 4" .I4'., iir 4 r rti..G".4"el._ler or•-..-i 1 I_......,-• r. 1..............• 1-,--:;•!,-'7-T"_;.A*47,7 r. "."(-1''"7"--y .. c 7.3-clt 2....3-=2..% i Ain T.A--..• .._-,rif --.4: .4.4-4-" r'''',>. 7?-) .e.-'...,-,-,4,-:. - ,-,.,..,.. pr,o reA. 414e.r.e..e sr'......../_s7-.44_d_'a)" .'-....472, c ,-,,-,-,:1. c, 1 , 1 -• END1NG ' OF FILE FILE TITLE C7) 406 .--79