HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA79-446r
BEGINNING
OF FILE
FILE TITLE
at&
4 .4679
MICROFILMED
OF R4,1
di THE CITY OF RENTONt$z
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
oera Sip a' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
9A co'
FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235 -2593
o P
9
TED SEPjE
O
Feb:--uary 25, 1980
Mr. Wavman Hamlin
320 Andover Park E.
Tukwila, WA 98188
RE: File No. SA-446-79; Southland Corporation (7-Eleven Stores) .
Dear Mr. Hamlin:
This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was
approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of
February 8, 1980, has not been appealed within the time period
established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is considered
final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for
permanent filing.
Sincerely,
K46.—ifQ .\634"k' fr"4".4"----
Fred J. Kaufman
Hearing Examiner
cc: Planning Department.
City Clerk
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
State of Washington)
County of King
Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon
oath disposes and states:
That on the 8th day of February 19 80 , affiant
deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope
containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid,
acdressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled
application or petition.
Subscribed and sworn this day of ` -AD\ a vi
19
Notary Public in and for the State
of Washington, residing at Renton
Application, Petition or Case : Southland Corporation; SA-446-79
The mLnu tea contain a V..4 t o 6 the pan ti.e4 o b necond)
February 8, 1980
OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT AND DECISION .
APPLICANT: Southland Corporation FILE NO. SA-446-79
7-Eleven Stores)
LOCATION: Southwest corner of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and N.E. 4th Street.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests site plan approval for the construction
of a 7-Eleven grocery store on Lot No. 1 of Tino Cugini Short
Plat Number One.
SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions.
Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by
REPORT: the Examiner on February 4, 1980.
PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining
available information on file with the application, and field
checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner
conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows:
The hearing was opened on February 5, 1980 at 9:07 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Renton Municipal Building.
Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner.
It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed
the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1.
Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following
additional exhibits into the record:
Exhibit #2: Site Plan as submitted
Exhibit #3: Landscape Plan as submitted
Exhibit #4: Site and Landscape Plan with staff comments
Mr. Blaylock added a provision in the Planning Department recommendation for additional
landscaping at the northeast corner of the proposed building. The Examiner inquired if
landscaping or lawn was proposed between the curb and sidewalk on N.E. 3rd Street. Mr.
Blaylock indicated the Planning Department recommendation for low-growing ground cover
which would not obscure sight distance for purposes of traffic safety. He also noted
that similar sight distance problems on Jefferson Avenue N.E. will preclude planting of
trees in that location.
The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was:
Wayman Hamlin
320 Andover Park E.
Tukwila, WA 98188
Mr. Hamlin, representing the applicant, indicated general concurrence with recommendations
contained in Exhibit #1, and advised that plans for future building expansion do not
exist at this time. However, he expressed objection to a requirement for a five-foot
landscape strip on the western property line due to plans for concurrent development of
remaining lots in the short plat and a previously executed agreement to provide joint
access at that location. He also noted that due to the standard shape of the building
which cannot be changed, problems would be caused by provision of an additional five feet
of landscaping. Mr. Blaylock advised that the Planning Department would not object to
a modification of the requirement for five feet of landscaping upon development of
adjacent property to the west when a driveway could be provided and the landscaping removed.
The Examiner inquired if the building structure could be shifted five feet to the east.
Mr. Blaylock noted that although sufficient space exists to allow a five-foot shift to
the east, parking area may not be adequate if future expansion of the building occurs.
He also advised a possible alternative to reverse the placement of the building to face
in an easterly direction. Mr. Hamlin indicated the applicant's preference to direct the
building tc N.E. 3rd Street for advantageous exposure to the bulk of the traffic.
SA-446-79 Page Two
The Examiner inquired regarding the proposed location of the sign pole. Mr. Hamlin
advised that placement would occur towards the northeast corner of the building. He
also indicated the applicant's desire to preserve the area in proximity to the sign
free from obscuring trees.
The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the request. There was no
response. He then requested final comments from the Planning Department. There were
no further ccmments. The hearing regarding File No. SA-446-79 was closed by the
Examiner at S:37 a.m.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner
now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
1. The request is for approval of a site plan for the Southland Corporation's
construction of a 7-Eleven store on the southwest corner of Jefferson Avenue N.E.
and N.E. 4th Street.
2. The Planning Department report sets forth the issues, applicable policies and
provisions, and departmental recommendations in this matter, and is entered as
Exhibit 41.
3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental
Policy A:t of 1971, R.C.W. 43.21.C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance
has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official.
4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the
impact of this development.
5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed.
6. All existing utilities are in close proximity and may be extended to the subject
property.
7. The proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, lot coverage and height
requirements of Section 4-711 (B-l; Business) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628,
Code of General Ordinances.
8. The subject property was annexed into the city in 1966 and was zoned B-1 in 1971.
The short plat on the property was filed in October of 1979.
9. The sub-ect property is zoned B-1. The other zoning districts in the area consist
of a mixture of zoning types. West of the subject property the land is zoned
GS-1 (General; Single Family Residential; minimum lot size 35,000 square feet) .
South and east of the subject property is a large G zone (See GS-1, above) . There
is an L•-1 (Light Industry) zone just south of the subject property. North of the
site are single family residential zones.
10. Land use in the area consists of predominantly single family uses to the north
across N.E. 4th Street and developed and developing commercial uses on the south
side of N.E. 4th Street.
11. The subject site is level and is covered with scrub grasses.
12. The applicant proposes constructing a 2,400 square foot convenience food store on
a lot containing 34,720 square feet. Under the terms of the previously approved
short plat any proposal requires site approval by the Hearing Examiner.
13. The applicant's plans indicate that gas pumps may be included in the future, and
any alteration of the site would also require site approval under terms of the
short plat approval.
14. Through an oversight, the applicant included plans for only eleven parking spaces
when tuelve are required pursuant to Section 4-2208.2.F of the Parking and Loading
Ordinance. The applicant indicated that the additional space will be provided
immediately adjacent to the parking space labeled No. 1 on Exhibit #4.
15. The Parking and Loading Ordinance further requires that unrelieved asphalt parking
areas over 10,000 square feet contain internal landscaping of not less than 5% of
the area. The applicant, therefore, must provide approximately 1,300 square feet
of landscaping for the 26,400 square feet of parking and maneuvering space proposed
on the subject property.
SA-446-79 Page Three
16. The Planning Department recommended that a five-foot landscape buffer consisting of
natural vegetation be required along the eastern property line to provide relief
from structures and asphalt paving in this area.
17. The applicant indicated that the subject property and the adjacent property to the
west will be developed into an integrated commercial facility, and landscaping of
the property line between this lot and the adjacent lot would preclude traffic
flow between the properties.
18. The Plann:.ng Department recommended major expansion of the perimeter landscaping
along the south and east property lines where the curbs vary from about 25 feet to
60 feet from the property lines.
The Plann:Lng Department recommendation recognizes that any landscaping would be
jeopardized by street expansion and has generally recommended ground cover and
low growing shrubs which could easily be removed.
Street trees would be planted between the sidewalk and the property line on the
north, east and south.
19. The applicant indicated that the building is constructed from a standard plan and
the size and shape is unalterable. The Planning Department indicated that sufficient
area exists to enable shifting the structure on the lot about five feet to the east
to accomplish the five feet of required landscaping.
20. An eight-foot sidewalk is required in commercial zones pursuant to Section 9-1108. 7.H
of the Subdivision Ordinance.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The proposed facility as modified by the Planning Department appears to be a well-
designed complex which will serve the residential neighborhood to the north and
provide a convenient stopping off point for commuters returning home.
2. The facility will satisfy the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan by
providing needed and environmentally sound commercial facilities along major
arterials, and convenience for the shopping public. It will also expand the tax
base of the city and will enable the subject property to be used for its highest
and best use as limited by the subject property's B-1 zoning.
3. The proposed landscaping will be quite extensive and will provide both a pleasing
visual appearance to those passing the facility on N.E. 3rd Street and N.E. 4th
Street, and will at the same time serve as an effective buffer for those residences
located north of the subject property across N.E. 4th Street.
4. The landscaping should include approximately 17 feet of ground cover on the south
of the subject proposal between the curb and the sidewalk and street trees between
the sidewalk and the property line.
On the east, the landscaping should consist of approximately 22 feet of shrubs and
ground cover between the sidewalk and the property line and about 30 feet of ground
cover between the sidewalk and the curb. Street trees should be planted in such
a manner as not to interfere with sight lines of the turning traffic.
The landscaping on the north should consist of a mixture of street trees, shrubs
and ground cover between the sidewalk and the property line.
The proposed building should be moved approximately five feet to the east and a
five-foot landscape buffer should be planted along this property line for the
entire distance. A limited amount of landscaping can be removed to permit the
construction of a drive upon the completion and occupancy of the adjacent western
property to enable the integration of the commercial facilities.
The final landscaping plans shall also include additional internal landscaping to
meet the requirements of Section 4-2204.8.B(3) . The additional landscaping shall
include but not necessarily be limited to landscaping the area east of parking space
6 and south of parking space #5 of Exhibit #4.
Pursuant t.o Section 4-2204.8.A, the landscaping shall be subject to the approval of
the Planning Department.
5. The traffic situation in the area may present some problems with left turn maneuvers
from N.E. 3rd Street onto Jefferson and into the subject proposal. The future
installation of gas pumps would most likely complicate this situation and the Public
Works Department should implement traffic control measures commensurate with the
developing situation.
h
SA-446-79 Page Four
DECISION:
Exhibit #4, the site plan as modified by the Planning Department and as further modified
herein is approved subject to the following:
1. The installation of eight-foot sidewalks on the north, east and south perimeter
of the subject property.
2. The modification of the site plans to locate the main building five feet from the
west property line and the installation of landscape vegetation along this property
line; such landscaping may be removed to permit the circulation of traffic from the
subject property to the adjacent property to the west, but only insofar as is
necessary to permit circulation. The parcels are not to be treated as one large
parking lot without internal landscaping.
3. The installation of landscaping along the north, east and south property lines and
between the sidewalks and curbs to include trees, shrubs and ground cover and subject
to the approval of the Planning Department as outlined in Conclusion No. 4 above and
Exhibit #4.
4. The provision of the required 5% internal landscaping as required by the Parking
and Loading Ordinance (Section 4-2208.8.B(3) ) .
5. The installation of underground sprinkler systems pursuant to Section 4-2208.8.C.
6. The completion of Conditions No. 1 through 5 to the satisfaction of the Planning
Department prior to the issuance of the occupancy permit.
7. Any further modification of the subject property including but not limited to the
installation of gasoline pumps shall require site review by the Hearing Examiner.
ORDERED THIS 8th day of February, 1980.
Fred J. K man
Land Use Hearing Examiner
TRANSMITTED THIS 8th day of February, 1980 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party
of record:
Wayman Hamlin, Southland Corp. , 320 Andover Park E. ,
Tukwila, WA 98188
TRANSMITTED THIS 8th day of February, 1980 to the following:
Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch
Councilman Richard M, Stredicke
Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director
Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
Michael Hanis, Planning Commission Chairman
Ron Nelson, Building Division
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must
be filed in writing on or before February 22, 1980. Any aggrieved person feeling that
the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact,
error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably
available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner
within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall
set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after
review of the record, take further action as he deems proper.
An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that
such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting
other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in
the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in
said department.
RECEIVED
CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
F E B 51980
PLANNING DEPARTMENT AM PM
7,819110,11112,1,213141516
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
EXHIBIT 1'1. /
FEBRUARY 5, 1980
ITEM NO. 9
APPLICANT: SOUTHLAND CORPORATION ( 7-11 Stores)
FILE NUMBER: Site Plan Approval SA-446-79
A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The applicant requests site plan approval for the construction
of a 7-Eleven grocery store on Lot 1 of Tino Cugini Short Plat
Number One.
B. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1 . Owner of Record: TINO CUGINI
2 . Applicant : SOUTHLAND CORPORATION
Contract Purchaser
3. Location : (Vicinty Map The southwest corner of Jefferson
Attached)Avenue N.E . and N.E . 4th Street .
4. Legal Description: Lot #1 of Tino Cugini Short Plat #1
5. Size of Property: 34, 720 square feet .
6. Access: Via N.E . 3rd and 4th Streets .
7 . Existing Zoning: B-1 , Business Use
8. Existing Zoning in
the Area:
B-1 , Business Use; R-1 , Residence
Single Family; SR-1 , Residence
Single Family; L-1 , Light Industrial;
G' , General Classification District .
9. Comprehensive Land Commercial
Use Plan:
10 . Notification: The applicant was notified in
writing of the hearing date. Notice
was properly published in the Seattle
Times on January 23, 1980 and posted
in three places on or near the site
as required by City Ordinance on
January 18, 1980.
C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND:
The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #2249 on
June 22 , 1966. It was rezoned from "G" to B-1 by Ordinance #2655
on August 20 , 1971. A short plat of the property was approved by
the Hearing Examiner on August 17, 1979. The short plat was filed
in early October by the City Clerk. On December 26 , 1979 a Lot
Line Adjustment was approved by the City of Renton and has
subsequently been filed by the property owner. Application
was made for site approval by the Southland Corporation; however,
the application was dismissed by the Hearing Examiner on January
10, 1980 as a result of irregularities in the site plan and actual
lot dimensions.
PLANNING DEPARTME
PRELIMINARY REPOR± 20 THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING: SOUTHLAND CORPORATION, Site Plan Approval SA-446-79
FEBRUARY 5, 1980
PAGE TWO
D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND:
1 . Topography: The site is level .
2. Soils: Arents , Everett material (An) . Permeability is
rapid, and available water capacity is low. Runoff is slow,
and the erosion hazard is slight . This soil is used for
urban development .
3. Vegetation: Scrub grasses exist on the site . At sometime
in the past all natural vegetation was removed.
4. Wildlife: Some rodents and small birds undoubtably live
on the site.
5. Water : No signs of surface water were present at the time
of investigation on January 18, 1980.
6. Land Use: Vacant .
E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS:
The area is in transition from generally undeveloped and low
intensity land uses to a mixture of multiple family, commercial
and light industrial.
F. PUBLIC SERVICES :
1. Water and Sewer: A 16" water main runs along NE 3rd Street
in a northeasterly-southwesterly direction and a 3" main
runs east west : on NE 4th Street from Jefferson Ave. N.E . to
Index Ave. N.E. An 8" sanitary sewer is located on NE 4th
Street withing 500 feet to the east of the subject site.
2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department
as per ordinance requirements.
3. Transit : Metro Transit Route #107 operates along Monroe
Avenue NE within 1/4 mile to the east of the subject site.
4. Schools: N/A
5. Recreation : N/A
G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE:
1 . Section 4-711 , B-1 , Business Use
H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL
CITY DOCUMENTS:
1. Land Use Report , 1965, Objectives , Pages 17 and 18.
I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT:
1 . Natural Systems: Anticipated impacts are minimal . Storm
water will be contained within two storage facilities on
the site.
2. Population/Employment : Population will not be impacted by
the construction of the store. Normally one employee will
be working in the store on a 24 hour basis. During the peak
demand hours there is the possibility of two or three employees
being present .
3. Schools : Normally schools would not be impacted by the
location of a grocery store. However, because of the close
proximity of the site to Renton Vocational Technical Institute ,
pedestrian patterns could be modified especially during the
noon hour .
PLANNING DEPARTME—
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING: SOUTHLAND CORPORATION, Site Plan Approval SA-446-79
FEBRUARY 5, 1980
PAGE THREE
4. Social : No significant social impacts are anticipated.
5 . Traffic: A typical 7-Eleven Store generates approximately
750 customers daily. The peak hours are between 6 and 8 A.M.
and 5 and 6: 30 P .M. A steady flow of customers patronize the
store from 8 P.M. to midnight . Traffic access is addressed
in the analysis.
J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION:
Pursuant to the City of Rention ' s Environmental Ordinance and
the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, RCW 43-
21C, a declaration of non-significance has been prepared for
the subject proposal.
K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED:
1. City of Renton Building Division
2. City of Renton Engineering Division
3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division
4. City of Renton Utilities Division
5. City of Renton Fire Department
6. City of Renton Parks Department
L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS:
1 . The proposed project is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan Land Use Element and the B-1 , Business Use zoning of
the subject site.
2. The applicant proposes to construct a 2 ,400 square foot
convenience grocery store open 24 hours a day on a 34, 720
square foot site. The site plan as submitted anticipates
the future construction of gas pumps and the probable
expansion of the building to the north. Any future additions
should require another site plan approval by the Hearing
Examiner. The construction of gas pumps could have dramatic
traffic impacts. Both N.E. 3rd and N.E . 4th Streets handle
a large volume of traffic. This will be increased with the
construction of residences in the Highbury Subdivision and
the occupancy of Vantage Point Condominiums.
3. The proposal as submitted complies with the requirements
of the B-1 , Business Use Zone; however, it does not comply
with the required number of parking spaces of the Parking
and Loading Ordinance. Twelve parking spaces are required
and only 11 are provided. This can be corrected by adding
an additional parking space to the north of parking space
designated as #1 on the site plan.
Approximately, 26 ,400 square feet of the site of 34 , 720
square feet is covered with asphalt for parking and traffic
manuevering. No internal landscaping is provided in the
parking area as required by Section 4-2204(8)B( 3) . It
appears that the parking lot has been designed for possible
expansion of the store. Either the perimeter landscaping
areas can be widened to meet the requirement of 5% or two
landscaped areas east of the building can be designated as
permanent . A total of 131E square feet of landscaped area
will have to be added. This would require widening the
perimeter landscaping areas by 5 feet or constructing a
new landscaping bed of approximately 340 square feet at
the southeast corner of the building and preserving the
980 square feet of landscaping at the northeast corner of
the building and southwest of the entrance off of NE 4th
Street when any expansions of the building are considered.
PLANNING DEPARTMElvl
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING: SOUTHLAND CORPORATION, Site Plan Approval SA-446-79
FEBRUARY 5, 1980
PAGE FOUR
4. Access to the subject site is provided directly off of both
NE 3rd and NE 4th Streets . Access from NE 4th does not
pisent any traffic problems. Some traffic congestion could
result from traffic traveling east on NE 3rd making a left
turn into the site. NE 3rd presently has 5 lanes of traffic
adjacent to the site. The 5th lane is a two way left turn
lane , but it currently functions solely as a stacking lane
for left turns onto Jefferson Avenue N.E . An automobile
attempting a left turn into the site could cause traffic
to back up beyond the length of the turn lane thus causing
some congestion at the top of the long grade on NE 3rd. This
is complicated by an automobile attempting a left turn from
the site onto NE 3rd going east . In addition the peak hours
of demand for the store coincide with the peak traffic hours
on NE 3rd. There is the possibility that access to NE 3rd
will be limited to right turns only in the future. The
Traffic Engineering Division has not recommended this solution
at the present time.
5. Neither the site plan nor the landscaping plan addressed
the improvements and landscaping of the excess public right-
of-way between the present curbing and the property lines .
Along NE 3rd there is 25 feet between the curb and the
property line. An 8 foot wide sidewalk is required in
all commercially zoned areas. This along with the possibility
of widening the street with another 11 foot lane would place
the back edge of the sidewalk along the property line. The
normal placement of street trees would be in the 6 foot wide
landscaping strip immediately behind the curb ; however,
because of a serious sight clearance problem and the location
of a highg power transmission line farther to the west , the
street trees should be planted behind the sidewalk. The
5 ' foot wide planting bed is sufficient . The landscaping
between the sidewalk and the present curb should be very
low ground cover not to obstruct the sight clearance . The
use of Ajuga Reptans would be appropriate. It is low, not
over 6" , and has a beautiful blue flower.
To the east of the site there is over 60 ' of public right-
of-way which must be improved with sidewalks and landscaping.
The sidewalk must be 8 ' as required by code. If the back edge
of the sidewalk is placed 22 ' east of the property line ,
approximately 30 ' would still be available for widening the
intersection if necessary. The number of shurbs shown on the
landscape plan east of the property line should be continued
out to the sidewalk. Landscaping east of the sidewalk should
be limited to the Ajuga Reptans to allow adequate sight clear-
ance. The exact location of the sidewalk ties to the existing
sidewalks on the other two corners should be reviewed by the
Public Works Department when specific detailed improvement
plans are submitted by the applicant .
Along NE 4th Street the existing pavement is 24 feet from
the property line. The street will require widening and
the exact location of the curb is unkown at this time. The
street trees should be planted in the 6 ' wide strip betweef,
the curb and sidewalk. This sidewalk is also 8 ' wide. The
building has been setback 50 ' from the property line probably
anticipating future expansion. However , the single family
residences located on the north side of NE 4th Street are
visually impacted by the location of the 7-Eleven Store .
To buffer the residences from the subject site it is suggested
that an additional row of street trees be placed on the south
side of the sidewalk on top of a 2z foot high berm. To assure
that there is sufficient width to accomodate the berm, a 10
foot wide landscaping easement should be required.
The site plan does not provide any buffering of the adjacent
commercial areas. A five foot landscaping strip should be
provided adjacent to the western boundary of the site. An
additional five feet will be required at the time of the
development of the adjacent lot to provide a ten foot buffer
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING: SOUTHLAND CORPORATION, Site Plan Approval SA-446-79
FEBRUARY 5, 1980
PAGE FIVE
M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based on the foregoing analysis, the staff recommends that the
Hearing Examiner approve the site plan for the Southland
Corporation, File Number SA-446-79 , with the following
conditions:
1. Addition of 1 parking space north of the parking space
designated as #1 on the site plan.
2 . Addition of a landscaping bed of a minimum of 340 square
feet at the southeast corner of the building to fulfill
the interior parking lot landscaping requirements of
Section 4-2204( 8)B( 3) .
C emu.
3, Constrution of 8 foot wide sidewalks along N.E. 3rd and
N.E . 4th Streets plus along the east side of the property
as stated in L-5 of the analysis.
4. Modification of the landscaping plan as discussed in
L-5 of the analysis . Plans to be approved by Planning
Department prior to issuance of building permit .
5 . Future development or expansion of the site will require
site plan approval by the Hearing Examiner.
6. Modification of the site plan to provide five feet of
landscaping along the western boundary of the site.
I •/ , f. •• :4:1 u;:J,,'1t•- y 1,SJ• ' . 11 t / 1 ' T L1'JaL. 1•id?'
i
Jt 4. II T.'°
t`
1
I.
N, it- •-
c ',
v,A lY. .c, , ,• -'
E-,,,1•.t1u• l•
L,
r •
4 LJ r'' •1 ems, 41
11. a „ [, • ••' . y .• • ' —.. '-_ I NSi TM pi, ..l y ,mow
1\ 1 sr •.., w • . 'I• ._.• ' , , ..•
I
N.C. w•Yc M[.V'IPN A i'•
joy'
i• • Ys' V `••/ t1
1+ 18 {SA 1i.t 11 1.
1 11 . t. 1.1r • T`
Li
L r1
y..
V
t ••••
it ° ' =i `K' it4lr.,
j•IMI,1-.i•._•1• r oln.
1,,,,,
I[I>..;• 'al_.'''• r _•y .. `• •',.`-,
r`. _- I i SR
1.t_t. •
1 710.iip •
i f- { ...
t-
O?
r•.,-1- ! •• - •.0 J•I~
r• ....y ti :,M
u.c c • =
2,,• ---• • • - —"..):
10% .t,4;;Nr . " 11. ,..!, . ,..'•''. '.4 : 1 , -I 1 6 ...'"
Is.: .i t: :17: ''''1 r-i__ .;
t.......,,, tI5 i
i Rw : t . . •
ti+ .
a job I e
B oaf
n
e
J" Jtiiiii -- V
1 L 1
d sty ,•. ,.>:.
B
o a
A F G
GREENWOOD
CEMETERY
F'=`' SUBJECT /"SITE
B E
I
c,
I li
j/
t. jr), !
L
c c.) . , ,.
i4„, 1
i. i.l'
MOryi
J =
t
I •El
i
as MTOLIVET I I
y,
giI a A, .;'.
idirt I rr-V
IF CEMETERY 1 i,i
1 .Iryt I i
yyI
i
I
lmr::^a+•caaavura:•r. ." :.,.asmsa anT3 am-0M.' . or.. -.'-4,
3 I I / /
1 1 , ,
I. I i
I OVA\ . 1 '
1'
1 5O
I 1 '
ia.azn-...aaasvrsW,
Irmanamslas.............zasr c[a[cxc.:.am.ct'xrr.-cw ress...aaR........
APPLICANT The Southland Corporation TOTAL AREA
34 , 720 Sq. Ft .
PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E. 3rd and N.E. 4th Streets
EXISTING ZONING B-1, Business Use
EXISTING USE VACANT
4
PROPOSED USE 7-Eleven Convenience Grocery Store
1
Commercial
1 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
COMMENTS
1
r',--L-1,5•21C=536• •••••••aerawc..eme awryc,,,a,--"aor.1,arsaan.x--weezemo6-,..r_evas.--mr—ors,le.o.-A.4, il
N
X‘,,
Landscaping \
1 4N
IPAsphaltN ,
b:0,1
I
j ri4,.1\
k.
4,,,-
r,
l 7 N40.
41 i I
I 0 t z
7 RftonP N\,,,:\ andscaping
I 7
0
Landscaping
1 117-sLeVEK1 5ToRE
w41.1(
9
Asphalt
44 i
1 0
FAciLiTY 0"-'\ STOrCP1 WATEd i II
ST
The Southland Corporation
File Nullber SA-446-79
mow.--..—x. mear1, —
AS SUBMITTED
i THE SOUTHLAND CORPORATION ,
4'ILE NUMBER SA-446-79
30'Landscaping
STAFF COMMENTS
60.
ih8,Sidewalk
to f
a' x 22 '
1 0 M • I Landscaping S. i _,. 1‘ 43 . c)
2
zi -
cd
r a r,) .ri 1
r11-t- Landscaping 4
I
f
i •
1,' c1\
r E-, !:- .
Asphalt
CZ
241 r.i
4-,
d'
6408 ' 10-9 t z 3 4
Landsc ping k'' siCi1bAr-I ,-, fl
40 o ,1
s
CS , c3 e3 N. A "r 4.
jf?
r0i f cad
a
7
A
i 1 4_,) E)
N. i S ao.
o Ci) 0 h GO NefirluKc Got;Landscaping
a c i-5LtVEU STORE Asphal
ve;" y
2:I00`10
14 rc/c Picx.cr '
T CM wr11- I1
VI.
0(P
1/ .J
mmr
1': /
I' "'
1
mimmi
I
a)
r..,
i--
i
r
r /
i
44..,..,„..
0 \---)
0 (
0 .-
1
ri/
44.-
1-
t
Z%./,,./ • '
ii
Tr
A
I
CCI
Z <
4
E-
4 •
i
4/ '
i !
0
Z
41
ci)
Fx1
I
PI
1:
4McEni
P
55
a -...,......
i'
l
r;
AAR-.-;
P )
N, • .
i •
0 -
0
i
7 • // /
1
1
l'',
k..-
1---
S----
1 .....„.
i
i-
4
ck;
I.
II
it
1 /
it
1
I]
J
1---
1 ------ .--- , \ •
7
4
r `-
t).•.
7 . -
7
L
he
t
o
1., .
E-
4p4
pl
0
E--
1
k-\\\ \
r
2.-
u)
cn
it-
Y
il ,,,....
o\••) \‘‘,
i
I.•-
r4
xlia..
s.
i-
e
1 •
LAcu
1
00 !.• ,
C) \
i
I
r"7", (''-'"
r,•—•''''' , '-
c•
I
fr --
4-,
v4
Y)• •
a.
7'.'\
I,
k'.!
to \:‘
t.: ,
1
T\
i
t
Y •/\
1
o ()
r,
1
ji .. \ \,„
4
01
Ott)
1
0
0
n1
ii ,')
1 \ ; .• .. •
I.,
r ,
0
I.• (.)
I()
i
i
ii
c.
ii . ., ,. Oft . ]
i
0
d
1'
I
7.--
e• . , • • •;..
I..; !
ii_.
o
04-
c,--
cc--
1
9
II
7
I!!
I ;
o
i• ;
fi • !.
d!i;NI9entonPlanningDepartment
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application :—e 8tt. 1/,44201.0 t ataf_WAS, ,1f' d r 17•17COA,vevtetrotte Fella .74 g z " 7669 es ar ..
Location : rens1 r -f a fz•v c
A ppl ic ant .
F * aj CO¢ Qiv .e3 __
TO : Parks Departmentp SCHEDULED HEARING DATE 9
Police Department A, R, C. MEETING
Public Works Department
Engineering Division OF F ,._
Tr,r ffic Engineering IFIVEI) c
Building Division
4JV 30 1079 i
Utilities Engineering i f.. '
J
1,P^ JJFireDepartmentf`,
U DEr q-,
I F'I. I IORF I GTNEI
I'I'LI C f I P
I LV EH I S ,'P.I r..nT Ior nl C)1! () p P -DVII FD
ll CO\IF RE.NCE B HELD ON
Al 9:0)0 AM IN THE 1HIRD FLOOR COI= =R= r
RUD '., E YO IR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO
ITT ND THE ARC, /PrLE SE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BY 5: C 0 PM ON _ ,[, 79
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: t) ('
Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved
C 7/4 - , , _____ 1 ) ASignatur-e—of- Director or Authorized Re resentative //
2)
2 )
p Date
i2 E ti'I.E td I JJ G DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved
ignature of Ti rector 01' Utfic»'i zed—Representzyt\i ve Date
4Y16 anRentonPlanningDepartmer
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application :
1(W4.e r401,1W
A.Vertf Lies Fee.), '4avp-e ` oir e eds_triantoftsdi
lolcation : AflejC,atiter r
Applicant :5e
TO,: Parks Departmentp SCHEDULED HEARING DATE ,_1 9
Police Department A, R, C. MEETING /2/ . /79
Public Works Department
Engneerinq Division
raffic Engineering
Building Division i
Utilities Engineering C+
fire Department o
C ii =PI S OR SUGGESTInyS RE_GAR.)ING - I .Ia I I IC FOR THE AR LICAT IO lZLVIE:U CONFERE JCE O JJ
RC)
SHOULD
d PROVIDED
ONARC) ( _3E La ON
j Al 9l a f)f) AM IN THE 1 H I RI) FLOOR CONLLRENCE
F YO JR DEPARTMEN 7D I V I S I ON REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TOAITF.ND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE FLANNING DEPARTMENT1ON _ 61 j j,_
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved
7/1-
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved
Signature oif DDii rector or-7CutTii»-zed-Representative Date
08d ri,4
enton Planning Department
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application -j ` 44 4a41.7 r g.c, 7.17
Location : ` '' 47_1 .e- l_v,
es
Applicant :aSaDitAbm,J__69_,epiairizedstal______________
TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :Q
Police Department A, R. C, MEETING /2/6/79
Public to `ks Department
ngineerinq Division
Traffic Engineering RN O
Building Division
Utilities Engineering V
r 30 lf. i:
Fire Department
off QQ
T.711. I CPF(S-E-TikinI'e IVI TINS '1(IEIIE J P' RIISME[.. R_DVIDFD
IJ Co ARC)T O .3E HELD ON9 _____ Al O:0)O AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCEO1 , Wyk DEPAR T MEN 7D I V I S I ON REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TOATTNTHE_ ARC, PLEASE: PROVIDE 1 HE COMMENTS TO I HE
WILL
I NG DEPARTMENTBY ): UO PM ON / 7
ter .r_c_:x:='_ -=_--_—=-r:.c_-__=_s.____._.:--r.-_=`==z-'=-..:__.—=•c araswcarar
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
Approved X Approved with condi ions Not Approved
Signature of Director or Authorized I epr .sentativ Date
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved
tom'
ignature of Di ;actor or—Autfioi izcT Representative Date `
114RanRentonNanningDepartmen ,
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application . c d ,tee P s5/ fit40"7 1)e l®
Cd ye ` vet Cry"-- ',defe '
L o c Lion :4'__Cad e.__af a '° '_ & il r
Applicant . T' 0, ,0 -. ® g fia ____
TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : :',/ .f .,'' p
Police Department A, R. C, MEETING._f ' /77
Public Works Department
Engineering Division
Traffic Engineering
Building Division
tilities Engineering
F/ ire Department
I Of I I ORFSUGI ES !NS REGARJ)I ff1G H! IS ,11 iI I CAT SONJ SHOULD BE, PROVIDEDALICArJO 'I REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE pump
a-Al 9:0() AM IN HE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCER ';, F YO JR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TOATTNQTHEARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENTBY ?: UO PM ON l
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION
Approved lei Approved with conditions Not Approved
INSTALLATioti ok Nev-) F Ire kL1 t r.can
r
1 '
C I . 3 PA ,I.. ,
e. 77SignatofirectororAut •ize Representative Date
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Ul«iz--( O 7.
Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved
5(44.):c TO NSinc.c_,a1iJN•t ciz ( )/97"61L1'lpitir lM In/0e,t' A 6. J "
4 Are -- Cow CI s F665 "c) C_r r? OF L , t -w+0n,A..1 I ki. J T 3(3!; 57
A 'Vvtj e4 PLAkt. 1U/- R&v0 )4,0 ' 'T n(241'c_.--,6ki/ ,old , 1pLn! ae0.02c-'. 917
D E/ Sct f t w,e igi- 5--is 064i. Cider.,& - 7 j
o l7 54 Fc SCL cyz
O__SA--yet / O
i g a ure of Di rector or Authori zed Representat ve Date
t
FINAL :LARATION OF Iiimmill N-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No . SA-446-79 PROPOSED Declaration
Environmental Checklist No . ECF-510-79 Ej FINAL Declaration
Description of proposal Construction of 2 , 400 square foot building
on a 34 , 720 square foot site to be utilized for a 24 hour
convenience grocery store .
Proponent The Southland Corporation
Location of Proposal Lot #1- Tino Cugini Short Plat #1
Lead Agency City of Renton Planning Department
This proposal has been determined to ® have not have a
sig rI ficant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is
Ar is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) ( c ) . This decision was
mad after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental
checklist and other information on file with the lead agency .
NON-
Reasons for declaration of environmental significance :
1 . The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan .
2 . The subject site is adjacent to an arterial street
capable of handling the traffic.
3. The project has provided landscape screening to
buffer the project from the adjacent single family
residences.
Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the
environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would
withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final )
declaration of non-significance :
Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen
Title Planning Director . Date February 4, 1980
Signature d44. '2_..,G ._ _ . _.—
e. City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76
OF R4A
THE CITY OF RENTON
z
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
o .
CHARLES J. DELAURENTI p
MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
9 cp' FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593
0 P
gTED SEPj
e
January 10, 1980
Mr. Way Hamlin
Southland Corporation
320 Andover Park East
Tukwila, WA 98188
RE: File No. SA-446-79; Southland Corporation Site Approval.
Dear Mr. Hamlin:
The Examiner may grant a continuance to a time and date certain for
good cause shown. Since it is impossible to determine the exact time
and date at which required information will be submitted in the above
entitled matter, it is appropriate to dismiss the application without
prejudice.
The applicant under such circumstances may refile the application
without waiting for the expiration of time limits set for rehearing
the same or similar matters. The matter then is set for a hearing
by the Planning Department as is any other new item and legal notice
is similarly posted and published.
Sincerely,
FrEd J. Kaufman
Hearing Examiner
cc: Parties of Record
Planning Department
City Clerk
OF 1?4,
o THE CITY OF RENTON
y Z.
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.N055
o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI,MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
941) Qt• 235- 2550
itED SEP1EMO
December 20 , 1979
Southland Corporation
320 Andover Park E
Tukwila , Washington 98188
RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE
AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL IN
B- 1 ZONE TO CONSTRUCT CONVENIENCE FOOD STORE , FILE NO : SA-446-79
property located on the southwest corner of Jefferson Avenue N . E
and N . E . 4th Street
Dear Gentlemen :
The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above
mentioned application on November 20 , 1979 . A public
hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been
set for January 8 , 1980 at 9 : 00 am .
Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present.
All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing.
If you have any further questions , please call the Renton
Planning Department, 235-2550.
Very truly yours ,
Gordon Y. Ericksen
Planning Director
By•
Rog- r . B ay . c
Associate Planner
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
JANUARY 8 , 1980
APPLICANT : SOUTHLAND CORPORATION ( 7-11Stores)
FILE NUMBER: Site Plan Approval SA-446-79
A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The applicant requests site pla{i approval of Lot 1 of Tino
Cugini Short Plat #1 for the construction of a 711 grocery
store.
B. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Owner of Record: TINO CUGINI
2. Applicant : SOUTHLAND CORPORATION
3. Location : Southwest corner of Jefferson Avenue N.E.
Vicinity Map Attached) and N.E. 4th Street .
4. Legal Description : Lot #1 of Tino Cugini Short Plat #1
5. Size of Property : 34, 720 square feet
6. Access : Via N.E. 3rd Street and N.E. 4th Street
7. Existing Zoning: B-1 , Business Use
8 . Existing Zoning in B-1 , Business Use; R-1 , Residence Single
the Area: Family; SR-1 , Residence Single Family;
L-1 , Light Industrial ; "G" , General
Classification District .
9 . Comprehensive Land Commercial
Use Plan :
10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing
of the hearing date. Notice was properly
published in the Renton Record Chronicle
on December 28, 1979 and posted in three
places on or near the site as required
by City Ordinance on December 19 , 1979.
C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND:
The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #2249 on
June 22 , 1966. It was rezoned from "G" to B-1 by Ordinance #2655
on August 20 , 1971 . A short plat of the property was approved by
the Hearing Examiner on August 17, 1979. The short plat was filed
in early October by the City Clerk. On December 26 , 1979 a Lot
Line Adjustment was approved by the City of Renton and has
subsequently been filed by the property owner.
D. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS :
The site plan as submitted by the Southland Corporation does not
coincide with the Lot 1 as recently adjusted. The lot has been
reduced in width by 9 feet to meet the contractual agreement
between the Southland Corporation and Mr. Tino Cugini . This
modification of 9 feet would result in major site design
alteration. The applicant will have to submit a new site plan
for review.
E. PL1UNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the public hearing be continued indefi-
nitely and readvertised at the time the applicant submits new
information and a site plan.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL , RENTON ,
WASHINGTON, ON JANUARY 8 19 80 , AT 9:00 A. M. TO CONSIDER
THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS:
1 . SOUTHLAND CORPORATION, APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL
1
TO CONSTRUCT CONVENIENCE FOOD STORE IN B-1 ZONE ,
File SA-446-79; property located on the southwest
corner of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and N.E. 4th Street .
2. A.A.D. INVESTMENT CO. , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM
G TO R-2 AND B-1, File R-457-79 ; property located
on the southeast corner of Duvall Ave. N.E. and Sunset
Blvd. N.E.
3. A.A.D. INVESTMENT CO. , APPLICATIONS FOR THREE-LOT SHORT
PLAT, File Short Plat 443-79 , EXCEPTION TO THE SUBDIVISION
ORDINANCE REGARDING ACCESS, File E-444-79 , and WAIVER OF
OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS, File W-445-79; property located on
the southeast corner of Duvall Ave. N.E. and Sunset Blvd.
N.E.
4. SUPERIOR FAST FREIGHT, INC. , APPLICATION FOR SITE
APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT TRUCK AND TRAILER MECHANICAL
MAINTENANCE FACILITY IN M-P ZONE , File SA-452-79; property
located at 400 S.W. 34th St .
Legal descriptions of files noted above are on file in the
Renton Planning Department .
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JANAURY 8, 1980 AT 9 :00 A. M. TO
EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS.
GORDON Y. ERICKSEN
PUBLISHED December 28, 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR
CERTIFICATION
I , STEVE MUNSON HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES
OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT ARE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES
ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW.
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn
to before me, a Notary Public ,
on the day of
4/19 'SIGNED .it7444eiel_
NOTICE
THIS PROPERTY
GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS:
PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF JEFFERSON AVENUE N. E. AND
N. E. TH STREET
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
A DETAILED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE ON FILE IN THE RENTON
PLANNING DEPT.
I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF
A PUBLIC HEARING
TO BE HELD
IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING
ON JANUARY 8, 1980 BEGINNING AT 9 :00 AM AM
CONCERNING ITEM [Vi
S REZONE
r1APECIAL PERMIT
SITE APPROVAL I N o1SZONET FOI LEEK
I ENSA-v46D79TORE
WAIVER
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550
THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
AFFIDAVIT
I , sort-l4v.t.-t0 Go(. . l ( tE f - -t I-4) , being duly sworn, declare that I
am the owner of the roperty involved in this application and that the
foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief.
RhSubscribedandswornbeforemek
this o
tJe day of 197/ , 2
Notary Public in and for the State of NOV 2019
Washington, residing at 92y'
NGDEPR;
4Nameof-- -- ii-Otary Public) Sign to e of Owner)
Address)Address)
T014C.utLA •UuA• crkl&%
City) State)
2a ,) s--/s - (=--1 t k
Telephone)
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me
and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to
conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department
governing the filing of such application .
Date Received 19 By:
Renton Planning Dept .
2-73
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM BEN 0/1;
8c.
1 NsiS
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY v 47/
Application No. 75/e 7y' e/
Environmental Checklist No. `Lt'/-` „?/ 7y
PROPOSED, date:FINAL , /date:
0 Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance
ElDeclaration of Non-Significance El Declaration of Non-Significance
COMMENTS :
Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires
all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their
own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be
prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a
proposal is such a major action.
Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required , or where
you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should
include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele-
vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all
agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with-
out unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed ,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with-
out duplicating paperwork in the future.
NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to
your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the
next question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I . BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent 6DuZbt(/P.P-ti4,10• (W ki*
2. Address and phone number of Proponent:
La sett-to 0 arc- PPML • 7.1
41$1 c-c
3. Date Checklist submitted
4. Agency requiring Checklist
5. Name of proposal , if applicable:
6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate
understanding of its scope and nature) :
VW) SF Coy-lV'£a{i E rtc E goo o Sze
b K 6 C.fcn-v uE. s t Sao) .
2-at
7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well
as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including
any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ-
mental setting of the proposal ) :
A via•-rr LOT u, (z k.4 V+1,1° L rt-tc.& V 74.--cw1--t —
6 lLBK S 4 '() - S .es
8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal :
9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal
federal , state and local --including rezones) :
Io(LT 13,AT-T 80.51 0-4*.A S L-te..k.-4.5E-5
1 FA I."tx p eeLM-t( '
gL04.. 1JEvtJ-uiT•
10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal ? If yes , explain :
f l;S rtJn GkS iSU -0
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal ? If yes , explain:
No.
2. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
II . NVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1) Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
Xsubstructures?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over-
covering of the soil?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Change in topography or ground surface relief
xfeatures?
YES MA BE NO
d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features? L
YES MBE NO
e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils ,
xeitheronoroffthesite?
YES MAYBE NO
f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or
changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
cbedoftheoceanoranybay , inlet or lake?
YES MBE NO
Explanation : $A c cret-+Z1 OF Sac. Wtw 11X PA.4E42.
2) Air. Will the proposal result in: 2
cbNy
a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient ai p
quality? C
J 0
YES YB NO
b) The creation of objectionable odors? 4
M NO
PCANN\'
Y B
c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,
or any change in climate , either locally or
regionally?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation :
3) Water. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of
water movements , in either marine or fresh waters?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or
the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? C
YES MAYBE NO
d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body? x
YES MAYBE NO
1,e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration
surface water quality, including but not limited to
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? CZ
YEI— MAYBE NO
f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters? G
YES MAYBE NO
g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either
through direct additions or withdrawals , or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
YES MAYBE NO
h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through
direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate,
phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria,
or other substances into the ground waters?
YES MAYBE NO
i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available
for public water supplies?
YET— MAYBE N
Explanation: hUDCT-10141"0— tr)2i°n'"ta°E, PLAY Eos 2LSut.T e';
Pgoncdo PA.%,tr(C. •
4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:
a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any
species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops ,
microflora and aquatic plants)?
YES FTTITE NO
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora? K
YES MAYBE NO
c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or
in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing
species?
YTS- MAYBE NO
d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
YET— MAYBE NO
Explanation:
4-r
5) Fauna. 44. 11 the proposal result in :
a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds , land animals including
reptiles , fish and shellfish , benthic organisms ,
insects or microfauna)?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area ,
or result in a barrier to the migration or movement
of fauna?
YES MAYBE NO
d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? k--'
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation :
7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or
glare?YES RACE N
Explanation: #010-1 c o H L--16 N"r ,Dv E: Tcz S 7 V1-E L bM T
8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the
present or planned land use of an area?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
1110) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to , oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset conditions?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location , distri-
bution, density, or growth rate of the human population
of an area? s-- MAYBE NO
Explanation:
5- ON
12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing ,
create a demand for additional housing?
0 `\ p'
ch
jAYBf ,
Explanation: j}• M o
f•y
6
13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : —,,
L A N N-
A
a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand
for new parking?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?G
YES MAYBE NO
c) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?
YES MAYBE NO
e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
YES MAYBE 0
f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles ,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
YES MAYBE 0
Explanation:
14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas :
Ia) Fire protection?
YES MAYBE 0
b) Police protection?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Schools? X
YES MAYBE NO
d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
YES MAYBE NO
e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads?
YES MAYBE NO
f) Other governmental services?
k
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
15) Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
the development of new sources of energy?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities :
a) Power or natural gas?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Communications systems?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Water?
YES MAYBE NO
6-
d) Sewer or septic tanks? X)
YES MAYBE NO
e) Storm water drainage?
YES MBE NO
f) Solid waste and disposal ?
412
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
YES MAYBE 0
Explanation:
18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view? K-
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeological or historical
site, structure, object or building?
06
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
III. SIGNATURE
I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information
is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla-
ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should
there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Proponent: WAG` <AOR
signe )
11, 4 N A`A-I-1 M
name printed)
City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76
CITY OF RENTON cks.NT'04/
APPLICATION 4C
9
V ti9 .SITE APPROVAL
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY v Q\
7
f QQ
File No. SA- 1/6 ` 79 Filing Date Oar ..?O 7
Application Fee $ Receipt No .
A NN1_
Environmental Review Fee $
APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 :
1. Name SDOTt L-t cr-tip camp ( v.4rs.vfM M-U•••t) PhoneC2- ) Si S. - C71 t)
Address SZc O0.14eA 194,4-K 11. 7o u c.-e , ()J o% ,
2 . Property location WC.. pR V 3" l (-Q 'PT" S KAAurs
3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary)
Srr PLAN)
4. Number of acres or square feet /r ppnox. 3'11( 72_0 Present zoning
5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? A ?-2.L-E vc
alkivp4 I B Mc E Fda,D
6. The following information shall be submitted with this application :
A. Site and access plan (include setbacks ,
Scale
existing structures , easements , and other
factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 '
B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 '
C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning
on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 '
D. Building height and area (existing and proposed)
7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION :
Date Approved
Date Denied
Date Appealed
Appeal Action
Remarks
Planning Dept.
Rev, 1-77
ENDING
OF FILE
FILE TITLE
ates OA / IC")
446 .79