Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA80-024
Strati The other way to build CJFILLIE ). Stran's natural earth tone colors give you beauty that's tough and durable. The factory-baked-on color coating method used on all Stran panels and trim will keep your building virtually maintenance-free for years to come. And the selection of warm earth tones lets you choose a building color that will be just as contemporary tomorrow as it is today. EXTERIOR PANEL COLORS coLoRs Sky Blue Autumn Gold STRAN WALL INTERIOR COLORS Arctic 4':-`i ":1' s2 Light14.. ?:; ,.y Arctic Earth White a Stone t"s White Green Embossed r, Embossed STRAN WALL EXTERIOR ACCENT COLORS River Olive Sand Green Moss Dawn Green Yellow Light ' • # T * a Dawn Stone "` u Yellow r }Sunset Midnight i, Copper Bronze EXTERIOR TRIM COLORS Jy PT:', :q' ,pa a, i m ER4 Arctic Midnight la /EE.t C'•y :.„ E3 White Bronze 11 74'11. 0 _n' 4 `_ b xy y r!' 7.7 Id a;t', 17, m 7. c 1 National Steel Products Company 7 Subsidiary of National Steel Corporation P.O. Box 40490, Houston,Texas 77040. Note:In keeping with Stran's policy of continuous product improvement,all specifications are subject to change without notice. All products are backed by written warranty,available by writing National Steel Products Company. Note:Consult your Stran Builder for color availability on specific panels and finishes. Litho in U.S.A. Copyright,1978,National Steel Products Company Form No.78-CS-520 f n 4.. B 7"C E 4'; 6;/2 3.4 1 S0111 POINT a. -,.. . 6--. ,_--..- ....Pc A 1 ^-7 ; L''_.4----: 1 -- •"L1' i•::r., C',,--', 1 F-- ill .I N, R.4.4.,R r's ; a.:*',\,\•:\ 1-2,_-__-___a a a ' „ ''. -.'•.:--. - L a k e .4:,,2_, :_,.. - __ ','..,_,:,,, _--,..,..-i,-.., ..,, ,•,' i...___-___'. --i_.--i___- 7.• 1,2 •',' 2- ' ' -.',-- - '• - ;-'‘ , I,_ 1I -V -. 70 y. .:„5''___._ :•.:,,;_1.4,_'_- _L. r(' 2_ rl .:=" r ."-- .7 1.'"'''''' shintton 1 2 e'•---,___...,:;,..)......, 5 5, . -- /- /1„. 4,\----r 2. ..-...., •••-,,,,Y• -,.. 1. -4,, 44,4-.; ::: •:,. tc f 1 ' i::_l.p.1",,-- T'''.' , ?-'•,,..-,-c---/A-- ',-'',c, /42\:.-,..,c.,,,,,,,•_.1, 7). r ..- 7.,!_p;:,,-/-1,,,,\..., s,`,--..,...-• ,x.<04, P•-••; ,.4 n . -:, : ,,....._.:,_ ,,,,,..,__,.1., A . 7 ,-_--5,, •••,5_ •. ,..R.,,,,r\,,,,,,,,,,;\,,, z\ e`, A','.‘, '\';'‘:-• • r\----;ka,g' '?'13 . 1 ... „,,,,,,..r...;.(r..„) Lt___-); 0.,../.- k......•;,.,:,,i. 't,',.,..c.'5.• ilf.„, \-151-.7.,sr7.2--,1,./?' I sT `"- i'' : 2, -p; 4.,__-_,L.ici-____11,.- L E., ' '' ' - -' •,•:''- , 1-. ' -- • r; ,_,,, -, , 1 --, ,,, T.,- .c. 3-,-1---1 .,- PT 1 , 7 1",.-,. 7.,,, ,.,1 , . a b-,,.,,„,____ L____ G „, _.!_, ,;.-_ ,,, y"--4.,_S_ ,' ST, Ic-- 4•:_u•-„X",-"rs'r:\. tZt..A.:--f,,. '''.'::\i-.-'-‘-• - ) 4,7-:.-"1 ''' 4:4-''"-'--'', 4,7L',5:11. 15'::tj c I.- ,,i ._ °:-;:'; r16i, I 4.^1 ST•-•,,,r .. .,,„,,,,,,,,. c,..- r,,... 0 CJ ti' i'' ..... .-`..\--' "t. ..„ ' .`, .' 1 -2-: '--'2'• - lic,7,1;i7.7,1 4,--t 31 ,„..,-,•?,,\.•:, i .":.' ', .-P ,,' 4:'. ,',' Y' "-.: '‘,./Z.F78 ,,...7):2.- 1*:;-/- 6.1 1.11'-'-l -ft,'•di 5 1 7rh-'p-pi7474- 3 ' 1 1675,12 I 1 1' 1 '''';:,.•. '.-.-"'4 _:., To. --27.`4;-.•8',. ST d• ----2,_i_p_i,,,,,,--....„4/ Tt.- :\:.,..,, ... \. . ......._,J,:,.....:,..-..,'1F _`,.._:_,:_'••_T ..•:,ri •e-.,1 P_.„,---).7e,i,... 3• 1 \..,'. -.;-----T..;„°<, = P- 1 --e-t---t— ,.,4___S±Tj_ ,,,i .. 1' '''.6 '...5..rk... ''.P-' . ' t.- r'''.-:'-•• F''-.-','''"—i:: , . "'',,, I ; L'A'Ll ,.,,,, '912-It , • 1 _,„.- 7'N‘A. :„,,,,,EF'/' • ._:3;. _ . ,L2-1-1Z.Dir'',T--Hs ,20,,-., ,-f-.: T• 1 I'I' '':, 1 S, ..,' .''',120'"P‘- 1.,...,-,1 - ' '-':--, • x„.•,‘„,. ,. - : -1„-. .•,,. '.,,•„,,,,.4. ..,.. i. 4.•T i'.: ;,,,, Ilt- c \,.., _ I_ T.,.._2 57,iD 5TcP ,,T.„....,..„....„ .;, .4:4_,..74,4-, : :-:, -: .-: . -,,.. .., .1-,.-2,-.2- ,-- ..i. .7, .,,. 2, ).„_t5'? ;?2NR 1 cp_Ls =,.,.. _ s i'' L. 2I ":' -..• L.'7 • ,I- ,a q . -`•• ..p,D,S i23DPL ' -' • s' '- ' ''''' q_1-:-15' ''''.''''-';'- '''''r:'st "'k, . i,14±4 ...------- rr. 1 -., ,,,,;'-----',.--",-;-i."-,k-,-17i" .''Reii?0,-,, , -;; -.i•-•:-.1 - ' 'sr,-,E. f. ;,-CP ' ?<., 4.4t11,.,....-\--- ,..... ;... 1 • , , - 1' ,1 . c .i. .,, Ri 1.1,,,,DI\. 37:1-,,..:---. ,, , , k ,_I ,__, s .., _ '..,._ 1, ::.. 1- NL: 1,• 1;-ac ?- 1 /‘-' 11":N'';.•"' -' ''''' .. 7-je2-1''T,.7,_.;‘,:-;'- '' .-.., f',' sk---- ',----..--c-'-L.-----r --' -:'.7!4,-- '''--; t,<,- ', At:Port, .\\• 4 ,L`1,,,ii.,.'7,1 C _:, ,.2 .--,? "-•:••• 'ft,- -I_ •,,-- ,;1".%. : ' ''',.' 7- . . E:',,,!. ':,''1-;'''.' . e.i'212-',47C. - i . A,. ... • , ' .'= T' T f Cc\c 1..„ . IT 71, , .. .''' „; , \F._• ,,,‘„t,•.-I ,i 5. '.,-,,, •--•,,t• , •,..''iKT1P‘,..5 \ s> 41s .is: 4,, ...- • • , 1--:,..,,,,/, ,4 ;,... 1 _...-,,„,..-,:• 7...,..— t,-,,, _,_. 1 7._ ,e ..-•-• ,• ,- .„,_:,,--, 7, :-- -- --1 .. - 7: . 0._ --,,,,. --- t,i,:;. -,.--7,-.;,7-7z,---, „ ,.• - --- 13 't,=",-,.---4--4 ,7,i .-;.-,L4,;-`4-',-,-.,--,-; t-. - ,r ;_;']. ",-"' 1. , _ ;",- ,-.'...- Li_ •- 6-,.,..- _, Th:. . ,_„ , ,,,,...„,_ ,..,_,,,,_,.... r7e'•-• 5, , .. .:i4 ,. , •'.72-.....='" 4,-. ..-:7, ----,-...,'J:. 1 5T. '1/44e'-.5‘ f"or rse.'.4's. '''''..'\ - -.P:'''''',4: 5 .... "B,g''''' "'',.•,- te ---'4'.1/1.,u.,S :': :,' IL ; 4.4'.:: ' : •. ..*,.,, ^ - V-- -,,, 4„,-'km'' ''..-: N. ,,,,--;---,_..._-,,, 7, ,•,, - r'- 4.- —,-..--._ Z;....,,_.:-7 ..,7-,,,.., . • r ,, ,:, i<6 1,_!.,,..5,,,iT_c,.,....cz..., s.43, , '.•„,- .... .. ".:.,' T,,, 1-fili ...; .\ .,. r, ..„-_'__.,_ . s ,,-, 4‘ 1 1; ',71,:!;1' '," ST___ 5+k- 7T,._-„__2,2___:_,__, _1°' i' , .„.f -?..--'- •44Tres, - ..•'- — ----- GOLIC,g;111Sf 14,, ,_ , t .„. FT•,,,.. sl.'i - I P,.. 'I 1.'HAiLg' '''' '; -'I A •-,,,,,,-....\,• E ,,'°'A, ._ , D; ''''4 f.„'-, ,A._ ii See !vial, -11 34 ,A B lv C 1\.. '-- Y/D b. ' z...--(_..-- lr E rr,fer.,•,..i. •••!_-___.-1---- ; ' A ;/\..) 57601 POINT0 -27-7-#" 2" f, ,f`„ -• '-.).,. . iif:-R A.5'10.. I -'-. 7::--'-'?i- j . 1•.:2 11 '‘ ::' I-' j;„i:- '-- B Fi"A C H KFAIY,YD,L- 4-. -IT-- --1.. : \ .. II ' - i i.',1„ 1:-3:1:1:' r';.'.';' ' '', 1 , ,.t• ;',-,, T ,,, ,-',‘ L a k e . 47, Is-._X.,,,,,,,,...,..p_•_______i5 .4 AS,„'`''',..-: .-; `,':'.',. . :,'''',"' ' <,,,,,Q ,.. t.1----,-1 -- . --7"..-'if ;. r'l S 1• l'- 1 '14:f: '-r:-- 1 k <''',\\ s;-. 1 T,r,7 o ' aS niPigtOn 1, I 4 , —,,,, A., I N,g '-,.' 4•:,,,-_ ' -•-_'-.L',__ '•',- (4, f:-------......._2 r, t--z-:,'..--,--, - ' 7.•?;;;; ., ''''...;.,..: 1----,-._:-7. •••,;;',.., i_I try •;•• Y_e‘% ‘‘ n.. sT-•'-/ 13'.`i ''•• ' -=-•ti-•-, 0' e",• 1 . i i •"70';‘, 2,47,77;, -7.-T---(,,,,,„ L -'•:.•••. I ,-;A .\., 1..„Vt;,...9:7‘, ,. -44 AekI -- - `- *11.1`-'_' .,. ,‘,4'.1--,ra. ,,,,\ < .A- - .- -4 2- t--7 CO4<-s .V-;' .-;;' '- " 11 t' ei;L-'1W-?.."-1,.'ja"'<._..C7-Ck(\-€3,'_,_':.'s','''':;:`..''''<'t, ‘;\ - -, ,..n. s'Nti, -5'15Lsi'""qc,: 4. , r -'' T =:, .• ;' - - :-,',.-_ '''''''''''.-',"-;;41 '''6'( e-''''''''. 52.'\••''''.,',- <It:-,' '''',-‘,','N, s----- '`-',.',' 'i =,:i-„E,--, ',--',X" '.;1,i";,'i 1 ''.),.'4:-``f-'/- V\,\f,'",,,,L;A.,`,.. ,•,;;;;-;;',..,-\•-)' 4i,, O 1 .•_*''a:: 4,,,,.,1 S. f'_:."_ 5—_„''.2_,'N'''-'•-•'S3 i i'•:'' --.A -•-`,• A;'•••! i- . 1 i N•Vsy-4,` \';.45k'4,4 `..--,4J-';`-1='-.-,'6'';"4C- i '''\\_ Th,3 r.i4:,, ,,7,,•s 7--- 1, r.„...3 ,-,-,,•,-,,,,,_•> .-..f...,-,-..,.- ,, :.__L-----,..i., ...-1,1.. \?..i...,--..„......1._.,•±-i.s.„.2_,._--,, . ....-ir i,, !;•• E:2,11;-/—4221,,,,,,_ ,-; Cr,'_i, 4, ec, ..„ L,'5::_ r_..,..._._- 7...,_-,, ,,,-.T.;-„, ,..;,,,,, 4.,, c, -•,., ,,,...,1 ..,, i q.,, e,',. ! a,,,__,1-2.--,,,,,_,..2ir,,,,_, F§T-Ti _ \___:,? 4 •,, f. ec;:.. '6,. \ 0-1 , •,m ,,1 , '-• ' ,74,,_lc-.), \:3ff•••-•4. - .i-f-,:---r-,.. - .,..:'t,,,,,,.„ ,•__ f__,i_i_ ,.., f. .. , ,- C, al ',..,__.. _,-;,,E)_,;;••__ S T 1 r--, a,..,,,,1 \8I .,i . sr_2:-..y.4_31___,1--„--r-7,,i, --1,_!:_gi'L;sT, `>-- -,-- r'"`-.'''' '* 7 .-c '..',:, i 0. ' ' ‘,-'e'''N st: as,c3 ' ''' , > a''I fr';'' -.13: --'11 I r:'4*-'''..!''' i54 "-— ' 1`,1-_.,G-sr'', ' ,`, -:'; ''A -t. -',1. \ '','''\ 1-ca.4z..,-"'7,, ' '''-* - 't",-;!--,-=-1" 4•-,-• -- 7,!'el 'I ,,:',, '5 1-:31 5T*---i- i- It ' 1',''' I ''''.;-R—f7=-1 1 K. 'rl - - A j ,....'" 1:s sT, •0,CS 1-`: `''.g.'‘,7,,, 1-44®1,,,,,,„,6,..,-s?,,,\,,-.4' -,, if •--;j"-,.."7:1-4 4 -',1 • :44"-5'.8"'"'31-`,,,' al ''' 4 N. =, , ,1137 t , ;.; ,P-'..----7,_ 11 S 1.004.-;›,''-'1 I''j•I .,;_t• Ii6i Pi'1.5.-_-,,,i, r- ,•:/e," "'"'••••' 1 ,, - - ''' cJ cloatE'LaCE N. ••--sr liZ -'--,,-- S 118T ST 41-, c,., 11 ., ••,, .*, , „j ,,, 1 .,,,-,—t_..,5.,13* P,. 1 i-,,,,..4,,,,,, , i','T I•3-- ''kf C.''-7, .-. -1— -- r-c•51-••• Lr,•'--1--" ' ‘, ' '‘k ft-' 8\‘Aif "Ey COcil -- ,.. ,.,,,, . Ff., sli;192_,1_..•.Lr,1,... j\b.kLIfriiii,-5.,.. .o '\ ,..,..,`,\n' ,....,.%, 1 I '-'4,AZ.::.° , . -1-22"'-11 • ' 1 A 1 1.4--- _..,„`ni.` A ,.'''''x'''\,.‘ .' c 7,,,s....._4____'; rf' si- w 1 S , I 120TIAIS11,s`''',,,o,.? ..,:. rs.,,,,, <-...";,:‘,.;;_l'.'" ,4_1_2_9111',..t.•,,y..._., ,. sT ?;,-12;;;4,, , , ; ,,,v,x,,,,,,,AT E.,„t.,s4 . A N",':-.\\ -- . - , ,..,si[ . --•,-,1 --1 ,ni-(i,p)..,',A.?,,-20",, 1--L. c 12 , t,__ s I '',1"-2j- v 1_14.`s44' 1, ,; I ‘, \',,,:f• If, 114,, . • f;,'„, 44, , 0,,,, ,-S .?_-,„,r,.t,..PAP, , . 4 .. .,)-( t>.; \TS' n' ' ; i q liND A.L'L'' F.-10 ,; ; ' ' ,, ; ,A'10,i Min',-,"•,,,i , 4dif..,, IT.r,vii,,,>4:s. .„.„ ,. \..,,,,,,,,, „.„,„; m \.,.„‹,,,,,42,...;•,,,d ..,,..1,1,...5,,,,.,., .:,,t,....2 v.,,. 1....,\ j.:,. 1, ,2'# c1,2E' r. T,V,;;.,.____-—ci,,3„:„s r.,. z,.• miii. . \i (firl,,I.2.:izT--\\5„: r. '',..,,,,„ <,,,,, j)*,,,, ' 1:., N, ,_. 'ii it,. i--\"",,,,..1...,::':'4.4 i, , ,t.( ! 4,02,,,, _,.. ..0,.,-,, i,--- 2-.=_,...-: pL •.-..-!: ILI ; 1 3,i,,;,ip, PA-. w 7i --.---i . '‘ '7'1''''''''''';'i 4. 0 \: -\`';''' \S`'')-'--'4'14 c \t". ?4,.. 1:' L' ST '\ '''''* 2 '''; S 1.''TS"'* 'illi"1"'''''sW''''-_:-- 1 $ T.-- ';':;•• •''''" ' ' j j---'.1--'-''-71--4 -\--?:r"`"-- i.-"---'';' '''' ''' \ 1 I)' '' S' '. 2‘‘ A. '?,' T'‘' s"' 5' \IV \`7;"'"Iirk----CP---- -,-,°,0,•°,,c' d, vL- c,-, ----:,,. 1,- d ',,r,•,!...1 ,.:. -... ,,.,..,, •.,.---f,.,.e-,e, s s' Re'04,4. \ s., 4-1--r!c1-1-1-",r414., 5 12V S,'''% .',,,, , I.:. ,,,A\ , t l' ih'''L',0,s' '-t-Aj._?dv.,--, ,1" 44,;14&,<AICTEA:Pt-A`:''';( 7, A- . 1 r-1\ In 1-7.-:',/t9.4-71,4,--j. s , \--rr.` L.,„ \\ 1,, , - ,, ,I ''"----\\ s'' re..„.."/ 2--____. z/ '''\;,....sxli•- 1,„,..,..,,,,,.'1,-„t",i4J-3*---=‘,-- " _ell:\ ril r l'--, :7--_ ) 1 ; 1 , , t`, 41 ':'`gi ,.',.I 4 i,,,. I 4', ' )I'. '' i r' .,..\\ rr I '5.,E•ZT T;; ;;,, ,2;1' •SIDL4.•.1-• ,.,...".%.,:..'.:. ,P.'..fa..r1;";01;41;C;',1;Zi l'X'°,•,12'f1 4i-•rni' 'r. ',',..,.•.,:si i'll).•-r,. 1.',-. 1,4 ' -° --.IVirs, 542=0!..,____ .1- ---.S-- ., ''.,',...ATA",,!2'...: 1__ 1,_.',!0te.04.•,_ 0` C "----,A --$11-1-i--- "'' i ..' -\SA''',1' - "-e'r_____„_1 ..;i7''-''''',:..„__ y_' '' ''''''"?A.i'-'I Trii ,r 1 ‘;_-_-_-,/6-;-,4c `----",-' -I-r-t,-,-- - :y „ ' '29,4 ' : ..._%;'- / --• '';'-'-..!. ,,,'",) s.;129,-.ZST i I tql -`, :,:if- '-' ''''--''' 4. ..-:' 7`'T• .,:e __,. V. 1,--- i._.-22 ,'_ _it f..;-1-,'''' .. ,,,,,,4 s.9 - 7' .' s'; ' 1,, \s,„:,,t7s s i 27,4c51-ar,:'`Ro';.' ..` ::'' - - -''---- s• Cc----', '''-i 4>'-.' ' -f-,4-' ----a"."--t-"=,,NN.'"----' ;` ';:-.'Q::.-:';'••• ••'<i' ...A4!.. 1s,,,,z,,,, .,„ s,,,,,c. _1 A.i.,‘,..2 ST__ __,__,T,..424 1,..<1.4,/',,, 5--Froz kl'5,t-- S•1 ,...'f.:,4.••••"'°01'1-' 3 5.' ' ; - f / iv •••• i. "'le. ,- , 1 1- 5 ,, f, 46'N 11 .0;<,,if. ,..0,,.:----!-AO ,• ''-;``'.„!,„ '. - E.,, -----R4: .; ' ''''',_,... 4,,,,,.., ,F-1 1'..__":5.•c.12:-<57 ..,; '...1 , / ,....: 4. s; z..;: ......;-., Si f ,••'?/';,' // '," . ' \.', ''`f Ns,„ ,-if' ‘c,,_,,,.. ! <il v,`.--s\ 3,Piii,e. '-rs. .2.3z5.,--3;i7:::::?1- 1;:-.J.:-._; : • ci,; r •' -1-- •4.4"••&" ' -'-' 4,i1.'•. '4: '44 5-1'8t f:( 16 -'-IV I 1-;-/-"-' 7-•,,,,.',-ril'''', '',1 ',P.';'4;4 41'). 4 /4420,,/, ,,4,. .,,e_ _4,_22,91,7?-4,1,4, )_,•,..,,,, -- s •-'•-•'•" 4•'• -, 1:•'.4 "Nc-•,,- ..,,..4 „,/• , .: es,S,-,-.- '•''' -'`,2..i.;14--114---, - 1' ''-.0 .---. --‘:‘,....----------"." 4,--, - ' ' 5 -,'7,'L'' I % ''"-,0 ' 1,:ie.t,N.CoRf„r re';'-'',..;A. ."- s'''',.' ;'‘ I......-44- 1k,s.,....c.:•7•-TP''''''4 ''''''''''',": 4. AA.: ''''''`' '',;,_4),,0:15„,:;;434,:,,Ar'.;i( '''..)r:r-----C`,,, C1.4 't‘c'`'S , L•SL.,!',5y- \<_--,:-,----t('-‘ ‘••,', `• 4,"/ 44-::• 'N 4/---,51••)'4' \,' • p-' ---""I 1'0-1-• 1 ‘-, „,qc. , ,6— ,„„, . -,,, 6,1?,.ii,-,,,T., . - , „T`, .c..`,-, ",,, ..•_,:•32,,,.-s-•;-\\--;, ---0.-',,,,- ...-- -- s.,s-,,, ,:.,, -„ , p : 11,1 ''''. .., ‘ ' , -'•-.' .-...,, t,..,:i:":....,.-...'''r,.. c 143,D s; -' EMIL,'.!C ra.1 ..00 r,..z. .,,q .7,1,,,-// ii ss,,,s7 1 ,, ?2.\g _ 4- T c),•:; J..- '.._ i 1 Di ''''31 A - ''''''''E 1, s,,,-,..,;,! I .. '''..\:\t, See Map 41 Stran The other way to build Stran's natural earth tone colors give you beauty that's tough and durable. The factory-baked-on color coating method used on all Stran panels and trim will keep your building virtually maintenance-free for years to come, And the selection of warm earth tones lets you choose a building color that will be just as contemporary tomorrow as it is today. EXTERIOR PANEL COLORS COLORS Sky Blue Autumn Gold STRAN WALL INTERIOR COLORS r Arctic Light Arctic EarthWhiteti.r' Stone White GreenEmbossed r f'.; Embossed STRAN WALL EXTERIOR ACCENT COLORS River Olive Sand Green Moss Dawn Green Yellow Light '":.: Dawn Stone Yellow Sunset Midnight fir fz Copper Bronze EXTERIOR TRIM COLORS Arctic Midnight a o L' r, 4 ° _. n r# t 1 White Bronze tit National SteelZenti0,5, E? c' y`Wg ud Products Company Subsidiary of National Steel Corporation P.O. Box 40490, Houston,Texas 77040. Note:In keeping with Stran's policy of continuous product improvement,all specifications are subject to change without notice. All products are backed by written warranty,available by writing National Steel Products Company. Note:Consult your Stran Builder for color availability on specific panels and finishes. Litho in U.S.A. Copyright,1978,National Steel Products Company Form No.78-CS-520 BEIIIdG OF FILE FILE TITLE CRaPILMED 0 24 April 28, 1980 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, APPLICANT: Fancher Flyways. FILE NO. SA-024-80 LOCATION: East side of Renton Municipal Airport approximately 1,000 feet north of the Boeing Bridge. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests site approval for two tee hangars and tie-down facilities at the Renton Municipal Airport. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on April 16, 1980. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner • conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on April 22, 1980 at 9:00 a.m.: in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, reviewed the report, and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1: Application File with staff report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Site Plan with staff comments Exhibit #3: Landscaping Plan with staff comments Referencing Section L.5 of the staff report requiring conformance of the landscaping plan to the approved theme of the Airport Specialties facility to the north of the subject site, Mr. Blaylock noted that Airport Specialties has not complied with city requirements to date. The Examiner inquired if concern exists regarding signing on the property. Mr. Blaylock advised that compliance with requirements of the Renton Sign Code would be enforced. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Mel Johnson 7383 126th Place S.E. Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Johnson indicated concern regarding the requirement denoted in Section M.2 of the staff report pertaining to completion of the water main extension prior to occupancy of the structure. He advised that a meeting two months ago with representatives of the Fire Department, the Airport Director and the Public Works Director had resulted in an agreement that occupancy would be allowed if the City of Renton provided a letter to the applicant stating that the water line would be constructed and listing an estimated completion date. The Examiner requested clarification that the applicant has no control over the completion date of the city construction project. The applicant responded affirmatively. The Examiner requested further testimony in support or opposition to the application. There was no response. He then requested final comments from the Planning Department. Mr. Blaylock advised that the Planning Department would not object to modification of Condition No. M.2 regarding delay of occupancy until completion of the water main if it has been agreed upon by each city department and if the City Attorney rules that the city will not incur liability with such an agreement. The Examiner noted that submission of a storm drainage and grading plan to the Public Works,- Department would be required of the applicant prior to construction. N SA- r -80 Page Two The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing regarding File No. SA-024-80 was closed by the Examiner at 9:20 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a site plan for two tee hangars and tie down facilities at the Renton Municipal Airport. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the. City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, R.C.W. 43.21.C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. A water main needed for airport facilities is being extended into the subject site by the city. 7. The proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, lot coverage and height requirements of Section 4-719 (Airport) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances. 8. The subject site is part of the original plat of the City of Renton. The site is included within the Renton Municipal Airport and is leased from the city by the applicant to provide hangar and storage facilities for private aircraft. 9. The site is essentially level and covered with grasses. The site is within two hundred feet of the Cedar River, and therefore it is within the zone of protection offered by the Shorelines Management Act. A Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit was issued for development on the site on November 9, 1978. . Under this permit the applicant has two years to begin construction and five years to complete construction. 10. The development surrounding the subject property is all aviation oriented and given over to hangars, taxiways and runways. Two similar storage buildings are located along the northern property lines of the subject property. 11. Similar storage hangars have received approval on the adjacent site and the Planning Department has recommended that the proposed landscaping theme be consistent with that approved for the adjacent property. In addition, the Substantial Development Permit required landscaping to be installed east of the access roadway. 12. The hangars will provide approximately 15,800 feet of storage space for about 13 aircraftland the tie down areas, each about .6100 square feet, will provide space for about 10 to.12 additional aircraft. The Parking and Loading Ordinance requires one parking space for each 1,500 square feet of warehouse space and one parking space for each 2,000 square feet of uncovered storage area (Sections 4-2208.3 and 4-2208.8) ; therefore, the applicant should provide 16 parking spaces. 13. The applicant has to provide storm drainage plans which are subject to approval of the Public Works Department. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The site plans submitted by the applicant appear to permit a reasonable commercial use of the subject property, and at the same time provide for compatible addition to the airport and to the shoreline of the adjacent Cedar River. Screened and landscaped as indicated in the proposed plans, the proposal should allow an integrated hangar facility to blend into the approved surrounding developments and into the shoreline. SA-024-80 Page Three 2. The size of the proposed development including both the hangar facilities and the outside storage area requires 16 parking spaces, and therefore, the plans should be revised to accommodate that number of vehicles. 3. In order to insure the integrity of the shoreline in this area, all landscaping should be installed prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit. The landscaping installation shall be subject to approval of the Planning Department. 4. The exterior treatment of the building should be consistent and compatible with the treatment of Airport Specialties and is subject to approval by the Planning Department. DECISION: Exhibits #2 and #3 are approved subject to: 1. Installation of the approved landscaping prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit. 2. Approval of the grading and storm drainage plans by the Public Works Department. 3. All conditions imposed by the Substantial Development Permit are complied with by the applicant. ORDERED THIS. 28th day of April, 1980. Fred J._Ka an Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 28th day of April, 1980 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party of record: Mel Johnson, 7383 126th Place S.E. , Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 28th day of April, 1980 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Michael Hanis, Planning Commission Chairman Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before May 12, 1980. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen 14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner'may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems .proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of—this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said department. C N RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PLAINNIING DEPART .ENIT Pi 2 21980 PMAM PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARINNG EXAI1IXER71819110,1111211:2:314'5'6 PUBLIC HEARING AI APRIL 22 , 1980 EXHIBIT NO. APPLICANT : FANCHER FLYWAYS FILE NUMBER : SA-024-80 ITEM NO. 5 - A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant requests site approval for 2-tee hangers and tie down facilities at the Renton Municipal Airport. B. GENERAL INIF0RMATI0N1: 1. Owner of Record: CITY OF RENTON 2 . Applicant : FANCHER FLYWAYS Owner: Gerda Wirz 3. Location : Vicinity Map Attached) East side of Renton Municipal Airport approx. 1000 ' north of the Boeing Bridge.. 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Dept. 5. Size of Property: 1 .62 acres 6. Access:Via Airport Way 7. Existing Zoning : P-la Public Use District 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: P-1, Public Use District 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Public/Quasi-Public 10 . Notification: The applicant was notified in writing. of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Seattle Times on April 9, 1980 and posted , in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance. on April 11, 1980. C . (HISTORY/BACKGROUNID: The subject site was part of the original plat 'of the City of Renton. A Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit was issued for the subject property on November 9, 1978. D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1. Topography : The subject site is essentially level . 2 .. Soils : Urban Land (Ur ) . This soil is land that has been modified by disturbance of the natural ' layers with the addition of fill up to several feet thick to accommodate industry or housing. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING :::' FANCHER FLYWAYS, SA-024-BO APRIL 22 , 1980 PAGE TWO 3. Vegetation :, The scrub grass along the river bank near the east side of the subject site is the only significant remaining natural vegetation. 4. , . Wildlife: Very little of the subject site is suitable for wildlife habitat. 5. Water : The Cedar River is adjacent to the subject site on the east. 6. Land Use: The site is presently utilized for airplane taxiways and tiedowns. E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The surrounding properties are all aviation oriented with,. most space utilized for hangers , taxiways, and runways. There are two storage buildings for private airplanes located on the northern property line. F. PUAIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer: An 8" water main extends east-west on Airport Way approximately 1/4 mile south of the subject site and a12" main runs north-south on Rainier Avenue North. A 24" sanitary sewer runs north-south approximately 600 ' south of the property and the Metro gravity line is approximately • 300 ' southest . 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Departmen pursuant to ordinance requirements. 3. Transit : Not applicable. 4. Schools: Not applicable. 5. Recreation : Not applicable. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section ,4-710-4, Review of Municipal Improvements . 2 . Section 4-710, Public Use District. H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL. CITY DOCUMENT: 1 . Land Use Report , 1965, Objective 6, page 18. 2. Shoreline Master Program, City.,of Renton. I . IMPACT OF THE- NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : 1. Natural Systems : Minor . 2. Population/Employment : Minor. 3. Schools: Not applicable. 4. Social: Not applicable . 5. Traffic: Minor . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : FANCHER FLYWAYS, SA-024-80 APRIL 22 , 1980 PAGE' THREE J. ENVIRONMENTAL .ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton 's Environmental Ordinance and the. State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, RCW 43-21C , a declaration of non-significance has been prepared for the subject proposal . This- is based upon provision of suitable landscaping to buffer and reduce the potential impact of structures and pavement areas per approval of the Planning Department together with the provision of suitable drainage plans and traffic control measures per Public Works Department approval . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1. City of Renton Building Division. 2 . . City of Renton Engineering Division. 3: City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4. City of Renton Utilities Division. 5. City of Renton Fire Department. L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1. The subject proposal is consistent with the public use designation of "theAand use element of the City 's Comprehensive Plan, the existing zoning and the Airport Master Plan. 2. The subject proposal included the construction of 2-hangers totaling 15, 820 square feet of space for the storage of 13 aircraft. Two tiedown areas are proposed which will provide approximately 10-12 spaces. 3. The use proposed is compatable and directly dependent upon the facilities of the City of Renton Airport. Immediately north of the subject site , Airport Specialties is constructing similar airplane storage hangers under Substantial Development Permit SM-35-75 and Site Approval SA-829-75. 4. The subject site plan proposed complies with the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SM-64-78) that was issued by the City of Renton on November 9 , 1978 which became valid on December 5, .1978. 5 . The landscaping plan as submitted addresses the site area of the lease. ' The Shoreline Management Permit required that 10 feet of landscaping be placed off the site on the east side of the roadway. . The plant materials suggested around the hangers are appropriate and appear to be of adequate size. The plant materials planted on the east .side of the road should follow the same theme approved for Airport Specialties. 6. The necessary fire flows for the facility will be provided when the Airport constructs a new water main along the eastern boundary of the subject site. The Fire Department has requested that two fire hydrants be placed within 150 feet of the hanger structures. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO ,THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: FANCHER FLYWAYS, SA-024-80 APRIL 22, 1980 PAGE FOUR 7. Grading and storm drainage plans will have to be approved by the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of a building permit . M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: - It is recommended that the request for site plan approval File Number SA-024-80, as requested by Fancher Flyways be approved subject to the following conditions : 1. That detailed landscaping plans for the 10-foot landscaping strip east of the access road be approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of a building permit. (The theme is to follow that approved for Airport Specialties. ) 2. That the water main extension be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. 3. Approval of grading and storm drainage plans by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of a building permit . c Z 4 k 0 I i 4 I 1.1T.2. -- 0_ __ i k .C11T•I. [a14f1Y4 Nt.V•1•r 7• A •,OfNAt. •••,/ 6•1'} a.ta - .• - 1 tom ti . . y •- JJ 1 if_ I,. , 4uI;4EQ w 1 IT: ft ir,,,114 I.... .. .... _ .... I 0 It 41` .: TIC, • If rk P it 11 . Is- A 11 so t!•t.T tv/ G• c. It ---1 \t l• . A, P. v. . kb 111 IT . ,NP5TEu. dt rlea. ` • It1 • t It L _... i _..I 4.._.._ ...I Ili 144kt Itti • VZI C ti J 3 iL1D[l14 .DA RS. s w sA LT #7u I LAG t 1 -r.rr•-' a. A.i in,c d.• .746.X 1•\V Ay .--"> o• Q 1 TID D.A A o... tiP i I - • f t .. ..• .. tk1.. • . ..CN‘ st,11 1.6 1 S;Zi a i Ini ‘iir 2"AirgALT \V/6`G•R -7 4tAit% 1% 1 1 1 s 3/Z7h0 Planning 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application :SA -0 Z4/- 0CSi Apere vas •ar ex ritatr Aulddtr giclicotos-n(4c i'Itqfes. • Location: Reveton niusietpe.1 Aerraet (se, LY j Applicant: F &tc/ r Alpfy1 yS TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 'l/is/8e Police Department A.R.C. MEETING DATE : 44(3f490 Public Works Department Wei Engineering Division 0 co 2\ Traffic Engineering Building Division 1 G.>>: c :'• Utilities Engineering ry /o 1 t / Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRIZAlijipeIHE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9:UOA.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF UR EPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TQ ATTEND THE ARC, PLEA4JPRQVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : I Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Masi. /1't& /2 u,ienti5,(.i ,o/` /-RriC l of 7/./6 c4e.vi/Seie"-c pi& CU!05 • ' j -CdniST24eG7ic34-) x9 Ca/Adr- 2c" ..cam pec-4'44 I2 b.ii%/ f(26. ^-r/t2St z. • ,'---//z' fz-o cr) 2 -c9dJ, v /`o.c 7".4z/s r) 1,-GO.oE/1"/E.N 7- if Z S o 0 i'iL? W,7.471 7 ) Ad 4 A/7" ..S- cGOG.42_,.. ' cw4j,..7 ") sa.. / c. , - 7--y S-T/2dC TiJ r • C9'hs,e - • 3 /e /a Signature of Director or A horized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Ua,i.i-ri Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved 7-) t-ig-/)1 I 0i! 0 ,, A/kL-1 Signature :f Director or Authorized Representative Date 3J27/S0 Plan 12-1 ,7 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: , ..".002C 8OtJ/ Rp /Aifaf4" Tyr' Gt • AA/etr- 11M,$- Eace'l,'/,e;. 0 t/ie Location: Reeeton -1I1ui ks p A% po p ' (See id kam Applicant: F ,tcApr AZypiVelig TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: '1//s/3D Police, Department A.R.C. MEETING :DATE: 3I9t) Public Works Department Engineering Division T f fi c Engineering rib1/1/Li) Building Division f6i r; Utilities Engineering, Fire Department Other) : 1r_ COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRI 0 THE APPLICATION REV EW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9:bU A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM.. IF UR EPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TQ A TEND THE ARC, PLEA4UPRQVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY y:OU P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved 2- %,1)-- )6 Signature of pirector or Authorize Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : A./G/i(«e,e:z2//k./G Approved v A roved with Conditions Not ApprovedPPPP a/ p'a 07 i-17/ D// oc7r47 1314'7J8°Planning 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application :Sit—Oins'9Q(JI APpf4((a TOr et. Attlat.r) t a egibsi1$` fitee'It fes. Location : Rerefli)Vt 1IIt ttfct p ( 4ttport (re itlemitsiNt11,4 Applicant: F* chr /a'yilliel s TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 10480 Police Department A.R.C. MEETING DATE: V.V.80_ Public Works Department En sneering Division Traffic Engineering a, k ;;{ ,, Building Division r;') '`i-. .r f'‘;., . , .1i i '\ Utilities Engineering i M Fire Department i) Other) : j COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING NB THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON 3 aft) AT 9:U0 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF UR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO A TEND THE ARC, PLEA R VIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P.M. ONce1W760 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : A' Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved r yj d/ /Nt#6G C 7' /e/i'y s`ef a,,-d s -Al v"`d 046,-'e ZA 5— C:7)-- -, 7-- - c. .3%_,E,/gc) Signature of DirecectV//orwor Authorized Representative Date REVI'EWING1 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : j _ Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved 7/3 Si'anature of Director or Authorized Representative Bat PROPOSED/FINAL GC /YLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCLflWN-SIGNIFICANCE I Application No... sM-64-78 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No. ECF-374-78 0 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Construct a tee hangar and tie down facilities at the Renton Municipal Airport i Proponent Fancher Flyways, Inc. , P.O.Box 412, Renton, WA 98055 Fancher FlywaysLocationofProposalRentonMunicipalAirport- lease Z known as Parcel No. 1 s 2) Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to havesignificantadverseimpactupontheenvironment. CM no a Lj isisnotrequiredunderRCW43.21C.030(2) (c) . Thismaaafterreviewbytheleadagencyofacompletedenvironmental ,checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.I Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : This declaration is based upon provision of suitable landscaping to buffer and reduce potential impact of structures and pavement areas per approval of the Planning Department, together with provision of suitable drainage plans and traffic control measures per Public [Yorks Department approval. Measures , if any, that could be taken to prevent or mitigate theenvironmentalimpactstosuchanextentthattheleadagencywouldwithdrawitsdeclarationofsignificanceandissuea (proposed/final )declaration of non-significance: 1 i 1 Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen Title _ Plann' _ D eet.r Date November 9, 1978 AlOSignature ,,Z F City of Renton Planning Departmentrv. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 22 , 1980 APPLICANT : FANCHER FLYWAYS FILE NUMBER : SA-024-80 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant requests site approval for 2-tee hangers and tie down facilities at the Renton Municipal Airport. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record : CITY OF RENTON 2. Applicant : FANCHER FLYWAYS Owner: Gerda Wirz 3. Location : Vicinity Map Attached) East side of Renton Municipal Airport approx. 1000 ' north of the Boeing Bridge. . 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Dept . S. Size of Property : 1 .62 acres 6. Access :Via Airport Way 7. Existing Zoning: P-1, Public Use District 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : P-1, Public Use District 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Public/Quasi-Public 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing. of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Seattle Times on April 9, 1980 and posted, in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance. on April 11 , 1980 . C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was part of the original plat of the City of Renton . A Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit was issued for the subject property on November 9 , 1978 . D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The subject site is essentially level . 2. Soils : Urban Land (Ur) . This soil is land that has been modified by disturbance of the natural layers with the addition of fill up to several feet thick to accommodate industry or housing. r PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : FANCHER FLYWAYS, SA-024-80 APRIL 22 , 1980 PAGE TWO 3 . Vegetation : The scrub grass along the river bank near the east side of the subject site is the only significant remaining natural vegetation . 4. Wildlife : Very little of the subject site is suitable for wildlife habitat . 5 . Water : The Cedar River is adjacent to the subject site on the east. 6. Land Use : The site is presently utilized for airplane taxiways and tiedowns. E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The surrounding properties are all aviation oriented with most space utilized for hangers , taxiways, and runways. There are two storage buildings for private airplanes located on the northern property line. F . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer: An 8" water main extends east-west on Airport Way approximately 1/4 mile south of the subject site and a12" main runs north-south on Rainier Avenue North. A 24" sanitary sewer runs north-south approximately 600 ' south of the property and the Metro gravity line is approximately 300 ' southest . 2 . Fire Protection: Provided by the Renton Fire Departmen pursuant to ordinance requirements. 3 . Transit : Not applicable . 4. Schools: Not applicable. 5. Recreation : Not applicable . G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONIINIG CODE: 1 . Section 4-710-4, Review of Municipal Improvements. 2 . Section 4-710 , Public Use District . H. APPLICABLE SECTIONIS OF THE COIHPREHENISIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAOL CITY DOCUMENT: 1 . Land Use Report , 1965 , Objective 6, page 18. 2 . Shoreline Master Program, City of Renton . I . IMPACT OF THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENIVIRONNENIT : 1 . Natural Systems : Minor . 2 . Population/Employment : Minor . 3. Schools : Not applicable. 4. Social : Not applicable . 5 . Traffic : Minor . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : FANCHER FLYWAYS, SA-024-80 APRIL 22 , 1980 PAGE THREE J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy' Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C, a declaration of non-significance has been prepared for the subject proposal . Thisris based upon provision of suitable landscaping to buffer and reduce the potential impact of structures and pavement areas per approval of the Planning Department together with the provision of suitable drainage plans and traffic control measures per Public Works Department approval . K . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2. City of Renton Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4. City. of Renton Utilities Division. 5. City of Renton Fire Department . L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1. The subject proposal is consistent with the public use designation of the:;land use element of the City ' s Comprehensive Plan, the existing zoning and the Airport Master Plan. 2. The subject proposal included the construction of 2-hangers totaling 15, 820 square feet of space for the storage of 13 aircraft. Two tiedown areas are proposed which will provide approximately 10-12 spaces. 3. The use proposed is compatable and directly dependent upon the facilities of the City of Renton Airport . Immediately north of the subject site, Airport Specialties is constructing similar airplane storage hangers under Substantial Development Permit SM-35-75 and Site Approval SA-829-75 . 4. The subject site plan proposed complies with the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SM-64-78) that was issued by the City of Renton on November 9 , 1978 which became valid on December 5, 1978. 5. The landscaping plan as submitted addresses the site area of the lease. The Shoreline Management Permit required that 10 feet of landscaping be placed off the site on the east side of the. roadway. . The, plant materials suggested around the hangers are appropriate and appear to be of adequate size. The plant materials planted on the east: side of the road should follow the same theme approved for Airport Specialties. 6. The necessary fire flows for the facility will be provided, when the Airport constructs a new water main along the eastern boundary of the subject site. The Fire Department has requested that two fire hydrants be placed within 150 feet of the hanger structures. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: FANCHER FLYWAYS , SA-024-80 APRIL 22 , 1980 PAGE FOUR 7. Grading and storm drainage plans will have to be approved by the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of a building permit . M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the request for site plan approval File Number SA-024-80, as requested by Fancher Flyways be approved subject to the following conditions : 1 . That detailed landscaping plans for the 10-foot landscaping strip east of the access road be approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of a building permit . (The theme is to follow that approved for Airport Specialties. ) 2. That the water main extension be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. 3. Approval of grading and storm drainage plans by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of a building permit . 2 0 3 4 t... x c• 14.AZ11I/.11114•WAr I t$3) V' r.: i.... r I flit-,0 I I 1 I. I e_. 17.d.e•' l i 1 I I .0 1, i t••\ S\ i PE1407‘,E. fatl*A111$14 81-11i•.- i 1"•• . 1 c ie--- 1 ..... 1" & .;i. 1 - v`.1.A I ..---'-;. ., 4! ' A .;PPI A I •$../. C•I• ,ri„ -- -.... s.-. I I i 1.... I T. t: 1*____F, ip 1 i 1 71..7....- I : I 1 I\i 1.1 li A. 1J Ci e W.I Ili 1 1 ' .1i I ii.. 1..• - :."."--7------ ---0, ais N 47. 1;Ili I 05 ;. . i 1 V Is% i'l E 4% .. •-• ,' ' \-\ to e• 4 VII 0. 47. 0, C4 T A* II - Ae A.1- . -.. ... ... . ....... •... v ,- 4 i -C tli t 17 32 C . t'.. i 1 i13" A I. 17 1.1•II.•T %v/ a" e• 2 ----/ \, t• r • -4 .1 ..- . linf'' 2 h 10 i . • c 4.•\ •• • A \ i. I.. gle5Teli. licli.144E.pt. \ • •la 1 1..10. c. I AII c.; .I i4,•i 1 • 1.-.....I 1$, i 1 1 •-- • • • • I 1.. I 1 IZ:likb Is......‘74 I .. i I 4+6 4 r 1 C''' I. I III.kr 401111P..-7.r. . 4-, .•..\!' • . I1 f."vr : - • 4t..1...7U -nr..A.c,ts 1.I r. ----' 1 " t; ••••--..... G, V' t, 11 re, t• rA xi.‘v Ay .---: tt , . As.r.141:4•LT. • met d•t'-d.g. —7 - IN,/ i 4,...X,‘ 13' 14 At I k. ,. T.I 811 ••• 0./9 ii.e..1.1..:.__..----,-,=.-e.:..-..:.; :A. IL; ....- 4.•‘.... t1/4, ak t. -4. Is,E rx...I r wrAy: .. ••••-- . • kh 1 T!ii II kir\7. Alr•IALT w/4" 4.r. ---e 411\ I 1 I 71.-.....4411TAI,• i • e o c• r I.r.- f,,y iv.u . .._-. i.ta. 1 ... - . ' 0f'r/j®Planning 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Appli cats n oa iwBOt +/ 4stot®EP4 TOP et. AQ idas- the JbW1, (dLC,'l,'It $. • Location: Re..efori MU1'1tet pc( 741.t'p r't (ve Lase-Aevi j Applicant ) / *,tèAr Alyivaltv TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : '1//S/8e Police Department A.R.C. MEETING DATE : Ws3/8A2. Public Works Department Engineering Division Engineering t1 : r, y_J . r' r"t Building Division 1 t Utilities Engineering a Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRI O THE APPLICATION REV EW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9;U A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF MURIDEPARTMENTTDIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE T ATTEND THE ARC, PLEA R, VIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ze, -s) Approved Approved with Conditions Not Ap proved Signature pf,. 1-rector or Authorize Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :VG/,tiR//kje& Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved de, 1 ICZO/i'9 pla'7 7 `7 e-/.77 •=/' /"7/ p/ 5-eperr4 i - Signature "Director or Aut ized Representative Date it a _ 80 P 1 an n.i r..g 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET App4lication :Si '004/ 3Q(SarAppfePO ar et. A colic J l,"/,,,. • Location: Riveter% M IP It ctp"I rlerparat (sr! Lec.eltem inill•Vii Applicant: . f KCheI' A/rooys TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : lifts' g) Police Department M.C. MEETING DATE : 713i8G Public Works Department 451lif—OEngineeringDivision Traffic Engineering l`E: %. • 2 Z Building Division 1 ' c- :f t v, l/ • q Utilities Engineering cv `2-Gcd Fire Department i Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRI 0 THE APPLICATION REV EW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9:UO A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF UR EPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TQ AITEND THE ARC. PLEA4kpRQVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DI'VISION : E 2n Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved ea&,. f-t7 i2 u ik6-C.i , 7/e /1-4 if cele 01 of 7W6 4.i.vii c ca+CG , 1€L-ad A/ST2Aec7e),U C,d&v, mac"-e-cc e ¢,u 12 All i/1 f 12C /t2Slf Z . ,E.-i/e " .C4o z ©4./.".e. *v f=o.c 7-.is EY,4,0,OE/a'/eNT is zso a ie-, l ',r. Tt a f y G"y A//7"S LOG.42Tl) 4.,,JJ --ise/dt,J /Sd " .o 7-}i.e. S7-/2dC 7-!/4eEz. Cf hy;) r-r- ( 1- 1-.1"-"----Z--- 3/ /G ignature of Director o-r A horized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIIVISION : 1.171i,irf Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved 41x j(. ,c -lv A")r.23 %,,.,o-ri:.2.hn Luc ( .44,S Cii 01) 4-19 v Signature if Director or Authorized Representative Date 4:1127/80 Planning 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application :49i -OaY•8O(Si4& rt.va TOE"_ a. Agutj.cr yeee JM $ E*C..'l,'/Ie$. Location: Re.. ! M m l l l u it tC tpaI Aerpo r' (ee 1pe dt'm 1/0) Applicant: F .ic.her ihlivays TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ` iS/80 Police Department A. R.C. MEETING DATE : 913/130. Public Works Department En ineering Division Traffic Engineering V (j i r 91, \\ Building Division r,-15';ii_• i') Utilities'. Engineering f Fire Department a` Other) : d/ COMMENTS. OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRI G FO THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON 34205 AT 9:UO A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF UR 'DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE T A TEND THE ARC, PLEAV, ,RQVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 7:OU P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : rag X Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved 11/`ii7a/ / r Gcf id.4 s'-wya,.-efs -/,, 9'4.d ' e 1 -4 57 " -------,------7 .--------- 4_,A-c, c ! Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ji- _ 1 Approved Approved with Conditions?C) Not Approved 7 L -- e..,,-4-4-'u------- -- 3 -- ,2, 2--.0C- Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date PROPOSED/FIN DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANt.c/huN-SIGNIFICANCE Application No... SM-64-78 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No. ECF-374-78 O FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Construct a tee hangar and tie down facilities at the Renton Municipal Airport Proponent Fancher Flyways, Inc. , P.O.Box 412, Renton, WA 98055 Location of Proposal Renton Municipal Airport- (Fancher Flyways lease known as Parcel No. 1 & 2) Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to have ® not have asignificantadverseimpactupontheenvironment. An EIS ispaisnotrequiredunderRCW43. 21C.030 (2) (c) . This decision wasmaaafterreviewbytheleadagencyofacompletedenvironmentalchecklistandotherinformationonfilewiththeleadagency . Ion- Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : This declaration is based upon provision of suitable landscaping to buffer and reduce potential impact of structures and pavement areas per approval of the Planning Department, together with provision of suitable drainage plans and traffic control measures per Public Works Department approval. Measures , if any, that could be taken to prevent or mitigate theenvironmentalimpactstosuchanextentthattheleadagencywouldwithdrawitsdeclarationofsignificanceandissuea (proposed/final )declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen Title Plann' D. eet.r Date November 9, 1978 Signature _Air L., 1` City of Renton, PlanningDepartment 5-76 e NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON APRIL 22 , 1980, AT 9 :00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION : 1. FANCHER FLYWAYS , INC . , APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL=-TO-CONS-TRUCT TWO LIGHT AIRCRAFT HANGARS - I-N--P=1 ZONE , File SA-024-80 ;,fproperty located on east side of Renton Municipal Airport approximately 1 , 000 feet north of the Boeing Bridge . Legal description of files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department . ALL ' INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITION ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 22 , 1980, AT 9 :00 A.M . TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . PUBLISHED : April 9 , 1980 GORDON Y . ERICKSEN, RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , STEVE MUNSON , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public, in and[ for the State of Washington residing in King County, on the 3rd day ,of April . SIGNED:e 2net.#241)1 t, OF R 1 THE CITY OF RENTON U Z. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 oNAL BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 90 CO' 235- 2550 O P 1TF0 SEPT April 3 , 1980 Fancher Flyways, Inc . Renton Municipal Airport 243 W . Perimeter Road P . 0 . Box 412 Renton , Washington 98055 Re : APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT TWO LIGHT AIRCRAFT HANGARS IN P-1 ZONE , File SA-024-80 ; property located on east side of Renton Municipal Airport approximately 1, 000 feet north of the Boeing Bridge Dear Ms . Rendon : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on March 27, 1980 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for April 22 , 1980 , at 9 : 00 a . m . Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550 . Very truly yours , Gordon Y. Ericksen , Planning Director Roger. J . Blaylock ticL., Associate Planner cc : Gerda Wirz P. 0 . Box 412 Renton , WA 98055 1 r,k"A x' 'na.e " '' p i i. me ,, 'I ` 3 t,i r' F a i+: ill:fir_. ns. 5 . 9 j;. irr i 1 I Tyt,W GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED ON EAST SIDE OF RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET NORTH OF THE BOEING BRIDGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT . I I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF u LIC HEA ,,,, 1NG TO BE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING ON APRIL 22, 1980 BEGINNING AT 9:00 AM A.M. CONCERNING ITEM Z III ROEREZO 1 1111 S $ ECL PE . MIT Iif 71 #.,, mj'4 1 i r k; r TO CONSTRUCT TWO LIGHT r ' k; F F. °•- L AIRCRAFT HANGARS IN P-1 ZONE III 1 ' tA 14 S e LI `: EE MA AGEMENT PERMIT NI F•`'° FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE RE VED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION I PROPOSED/FINAL LcVLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/hvN-SIGNIFICANCE Application No... sM-64-78 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No. ECF-374-78 O FINAL Declaration1 Description of proposal Construct a tee hangar and tie down facilities at the Renton Municipal Airport Proponent Faucher Flyways, Inc. , P.O.Box 412, Renton, WA 98055 Location of Proposal Renton Municipal Airport- (Faucher Flyways lease known as Parcel No. 1 & 2) Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not have asignificantadverseimpactupontheenvironment. An EIS 0 iscgisnotrequiredunderRCW43.21C.030(2) (c) . This decision wasmaaafterreviewbytheleadagencyofacompletedenvironmentalchecklistandotherinformationonfilewiththeleadagency. Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : This declaration is based upon provision of suitable landscaping to buffer and reduce potential impact of structures and pavement areas per approval of the Planning Department, together with provision of suitable drainage plans and traffic control measures per Public works Department approval. Measures , if any, that could be taken to prevent or mitigate theenvironmentalimpactstosuchanextentthattheleadagencywouldwithdrawitsdeclarationofsignificanceandissuea (proposed/final )declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen Title P1ann' D , eet•r Date November 9, 1978 Signature v City of Renton Planning DepartmentcTr 1 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON PERMIT SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT FANCIER FLYWAYS, INC. Application No. SM- 64-78 Applicant P.O.Box 412, Renton, WA 98055 Tee hangar & tie down facilities) Development shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and conditions: 1. The issuance of a license under the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 shall not release the applicant from compliance with federal , state, and other permit requirements. 2. This permit may be rescinded pursuant to section 14 (7) of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 in the event the permittee fails, to comply with any condition hereof. 1. A construction permit shall not be issued until thirty (30) . days' °after approval by the City of Renton Planning Department or until any review Proceedings initiated within this 30 day review period have been completed. 4 . Pursuant to Section 14 , Chapter 286 , Laws of 1971 Extra Session, the City of Renton has taken the following actions : A. Pcx ) Approved B. ( ' ) Denied C. Reasons : i I D. Conditions: 1. The ten foot lease setback from the top of the river bank shall be maintained in its natural state. 2. The lease area shall be planted in accordance with Exhibit "A" of the landscape plan to provide a minimum ten foot landscape area adjacent to the ten foot lease setback line mentioned above. Such landscaping shall be subject to final approval of the Renton Planning Department. 3. Detailed drainage plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Department, and shall include adequate oil/water separation facilities. 4. Grading plan to be submitted and approved by the Public Works Dept., Engineering Division. 5. Fire hydrants, fire flows, and access for fire apparatus to be provided per Renton Fire Department's approval. 6. Approval is subject to approval of other local, state and federal agencies having jurisdiction. L9 d —. , 416164...44. November 9, 1978 e.. on Y. Er- •1rse , Planning Director DATE: Departmen, of Ecology Attorney eneral's Office Dept! 'of Public Works; Engineering Div. & Building Division Applicant , City of Renton IPlanning Department Rev. 1-77 1 1 2 0 1›.0 4 4-"IN4, kx 0 vottl %...z, k reign 4. 4 ..- „. . d ck... 1r I d iva i• 0. 1 • I 1II, 9'•I 4. . . 1 • i lm i 1 1 74.eq. it CY''• 1 I 1 1 • I- 1 i.. ¢E1107viL riti4.1444 HLPet.c h.sAti. A .....v4AL ....,./ G.'', e ?A• - ' ',....• 5. 1 \ I I: r- i> 17 1..•' ..itt... • ••.- I,' I • r t I, I I • 44. ID1J 1 14 A 14 li',4 E IL 1.1 . JI It1 r____! U.- ._.,L tit 1, 1 i I I II 1 1 i \‘‘ ,. r• ,. It .' kl • . l o • g4 t ti... I1VM. 4, • •,••. . T,• rI":‘ y-)•• .--:" I.•.'.: e.."7A-.in1r•q r- 4P.i.• qfh•i . \•;•. r- C4 r 1i1 . ' r t it i; ci ea C. g --"? ...r r :.4 4 ••- ,.,..- Z z. 1.13,3 I alo,'•tie' h ... . 1 Is . .. •.•t . r • N. a m...-- loop-- 4, : 1 . k. N it) ,11-• -:,1%. 1 :'• ' I lievrev. •Iii•age.it. \ . • .. t:.... t t _..... 1 i 1.1,,. 1 • A 131 • k 4 .. , c.., ... .• _ ..._., I .. , . i. I i 7.71- . • :- - ; .-Ifi 0i P k I e4.•Lap t1.1.4.'XI Sea S .. d.." Air 4 vs • • . IVI. : ' • 4.1.4 OUT- &AC-tl. 1-y r..07 . -. •4.1 ., 4t. i A 11 1 "lit 4......... 4. 11% .• 1 k„\.% - • .- ••-• •• - : •-- T TA Ir I•AO .Ayr'''' t . 4'-‘. I . T.......•.-.1-11. 2• 11- 4-•_•A•, S1-.7. FrA,- m. A. e.-:_LisT1...-••--M4•. V":::=. 1d- e-. 4t:.--- G..:..r A......•.-„.1.-.1...-.- 7...-• •• .. N,. I ..V. T\ i\ I. I I i 1\ N.X. 4.C••••-TAN 1 - 1. 1c!ilb r r 4 A LT AV 4 " G7 _ A.r-lr-A 1 a % tr I 1,• itO i .p!ijr_. .:. • s• cs I ria- De,1‘., iJ ...... - ' 7--.:........AS...P.e,A, _ .J 1 7• 1 1 1,8TATR, 1 STATE OF s WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 1350.150th Amine N.E.Redmond.Washington 11062 2%y/Rs1900Y r..ti*° Pixy Lee Ray Governor November 16, 1978 City of Renton Planning Department 200 Mill Ave., South Renton, Washington 980SS Dear Mr./Ms.: Re: COUNTY: KING APPLICANT: FANCRER FLYWAYS INC., SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT #N 2127-17-A-(SM-64-78) Construction of 2 T-Hangers and aircraft 4ie down parking ramps. - The subject Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit was received by this office on November 14, 1978 , The review period by the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General's Office will terminate 30 days from the above date. If no notice of appeal is received, construction pursuant to the permit may commence following expiration of the review period;provided, however, all other federal, state, and local laws regulating such construction have been complied with. Sin ke1 , Resource Management NORTHWEST REGIONAL OFFICE NJ:sb cc:Fancher Flyways. Rkj EalR5Div • fv- R: Laee :cfA0V _ 20 19I8 _ F1;4e.P•RT DiR . s? ECY 050-1-28 N NG DEpP` Rev. 6/78 FRS CITY OF RENTON RFC/Eb '® APPLICATION 1 MAR 14 /980 SITE APPROVAL FOR OFFICE USE ONLY gbEP File No . SA- Oc7-51,,?1) Filing Date Application Fee $ Receipt No . Environmental Review Fee $ APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1 . Name FANCHER FLYWAYS, INC. Phone 226-6170 Address RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 2 . Property location EAST SIDE OF RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT, JUST NORTH OF THE 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) BEING LOCATED WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE RENTON AIRPORT, RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, TO WIT: THAT AREA COM- PRISING THE EAST SIDE AIR PARK (PARCEL 1'B") AND ADJACENT -AREA (PARCEL "A") DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF THE MAIN RFNTON AIRFIFIO RUNWAY REFERRED TO AS STATION 0+00; THENCE N. 4 49' 43" W. ALONG SAID TH ENTERLINE A DISTANCE OF ENC€ CONTINUINGNG N. 8V 10' 17" E. A U 15 I ANLU OF 169.75 FEET; THENCE S. 130 55' 07" E. A DISTANCE OF 361.24 FEET; THENCE S. 850 12' 02" W. A DISTANCE OF 226.82 FEET; THENCE N. 40 49' 43" W. A DISTANCE OF 356.59 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING TOTAL AREA (PARCELS "A" AND "B"): 70,715.96 SQUARE FEET TOGETHER WITH THE PRIVILEGE 01- LESSEE TO USE THE PUBLIC PORI I ON 01- [HL K 1 KF'OK I, 1 NL Luu 1 I RUNWAY AND OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES PROVIDED THEREON, ON A NON-EXCLUSIVE BASIS, AND SUBJECT TO SUCH RULES AND REGULATIONS AS NOW EXIST OR MAY HEREAFTER BE PROMULGATED BY THE LESSOR FROM TIME TO TIME, AND FURTHER SUBJECT TO ALL SUCH NONDISCRIMINATORY CHARGES AND FEES FOR SUCH USE AS MAY BE ESTABLISHED FROM TIME TO TIME BY THE LESSOR. 4 . Number of acres or square feet 1.62 ACRES Present zoning 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? TWO LIGHT AIRCRAFT HANGARS OF PREFABRICATED STEEL BUILDINGS 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) 7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION : Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks Planning Dept. Rev, 1-777 i Ab t/ / L • ' a,) LEAST. AGREL.MLN I pt Kity of Rutin:, to I.,nclr.r flvway., inc.)I w' 0 IRIS INUEIITURL OF l.LA',f, cr.ccut J :n lripl iwt. , cl Iccl ivt as v <s d" `,'7 A.rynst I, 1978, by and hetwc,en the Clf, OF .RENTON. a nutl.icipal corp? atron, Lu . heroi rafter raIerr.d to as Lessor; and FANNER FIYWA'S, INC., a Washiuccor to)1Iab q cor;.orat ion, hereFnal ter r•.lerred to as Lessee: t, d,. ar,y W1TNESSETN: J. s\, 17/I . In consideration'of the covenants and agreements of the Lessee. prEl P`': Ir:9reinafter set forth, Lessor dues hereby (ease and demise unto Lessee the following described parcel of real estate accepted by the lessnc. in .its "as-is" condition icing located within the confines of the Renton Airp,rt , Renton. King Cou.ity, Washington, to-wit: That area• comprising the East Side Air Park (Parcel "B") and adjacent area (Parcel "A") described as follows: 1 Begir,niny at a point on the centerline of the Main Renton Airfield Runway referred to as Station 0+00; thence N. 4° 49' 43" W. along said centerline a distance of 2.644.00 feet; thence N. 85"10' 17" E. a distance of 350 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing N.• 855 10' 17" f-. a distance of 169.75 feet; thence S. I3' 55' Oj" t.: a-cfist-il;c•• of 361-•24 Feet t.: thence S. 85" 12' 02" W. a di arce of 226:82 feet; thence N. 4` 49' 43" W.,a distance of 356.55 Peet to the true point of beginning.r r- 4)TOTAL. AREA (Parcels "A" and "B") : 70,715.96 square feet1.,... To :then with the privilege of Lessee to use •[he public portion of the airport, including runway and other public Iacililics pro- vided thereon, on a non-exclusive basis, aed subject to such rules and regulations as now exist or may hereafter be promulgated by Ole !.essor from time to time, aed further Subject to all such nondiscriminatory charges and fees for such use as may be eetab-• fished from time to time by tree Lessor. or, the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth tor a period of thirty years commencig on the first day of August, 1978, and terminating u- the ! Tarty-airs_ day of July, 2008. Lessee is hereby given the option in the last ycer of said 1 term to re-•_w this lease fur a further ten (10) year period, provided 0r.1 Lessee has then fully and faiti.fu' ly complied with all the terms and condi- tions herein contained, which renewal period shall be upon the same terms and conditions as hereinafter set forth except that Lessor reserves the right to renegotiate the rental each five (5) year period of the extended lease. Written notice of Lessee's 'irrtenciun to exercise this option must. I,c given to the City Clerk of the City of Renton not less than sixty '(60) days prior to the end of the -term. , Time Is u_f the essence hereof. Exercise of--this Op, ion -iss.roject- - - I- CITY OF RENTON, WASH I NGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ii''`,' - t_+/r` FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. s.1111r61'1- 7 - y ' I.ir:at • '; Environmental Checklist No. PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: /®®9-7 Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state ,and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent ]ANCFJER. FLYUAY; INC. 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: n r7/LT' m _",off 1'19- .6uTTON, TM. 96055 226-6170 3: Date Checklist submitted 4: Agency requiring Checklist RE c`JT ON, S !OREL INE PIA NAGE1IL;ATT 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): APPROXIMATELY 71 , 000 S. 1. AREA F'OR AIRCRAFT TEE HANCARS AND TIE DOWN PARK I NG RATIPC 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as wellastheextentofthelandareaaffectedbyanyenvironmentalimpacts, includinganyotherinformationneededtogiveanaccurateunderstandingoftheenviron-mental setting of the proposal ) : L7EPTTON AIRPORT ADJACENT 7'O CEDAR RIVER. CONCRETE TEE FIANGARS APPROXIMATELY .16 o HIGH AATD PATTED AIRCRAFT TIE DOWN PARKING AREA* 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : DEC EMBER ?9,7,9 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposalfederal , state and local --including rezones) : CITY BUILDING PERMIT 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activityrelatedtoorconnectedwiththisproposal? If yes , explain: ATO 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the .property covered byyourproposal ? If yes , explain: IITO 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some futuredate, describe the nature of such application form: IVONE II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in : a) ,'instable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil ? X YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? VET— MAYBE WU— d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YET— MAYBE lid e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , Yeitheronoroffthesite? YES M YBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X Explanation:YES MAYBE A B COVERAGE., OF SOIL BY BUILDINGS A•TD PATTING. 3- 2) A,ir. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X YES MK- bil b) The creation of objectionable odors? YET— MA BT n u c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? VET— MAYBE AU Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of . . water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X YET— MA E NU— b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES MAYBE c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE O— M Change in the amount of surface water in any water Dody? M YBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? Yr MAYBE ii f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?YET— MAYBE 0— g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an' aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water• quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? YET— MAYBE KU— i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water, supplies?YE's- MAYBE, AU— Explanation: 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:- a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of; flora (including trees, shrubs , grass, crops , X nicroflora and aquatic plants)? YEE— WET A15— b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or X endangered species of flora? YEr" MAYBE MU— c) Introducti"on of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing X species? YET- MAYBE NU— d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? K YET MAYBE W- Explanation: A) GR.fSS 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)?X YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or Xendangeredspeciesoffauna? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? r yr WAYSE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? VS MAYBE NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or X glare? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the X present or planned land use of an area? YTS- MAYBE NO Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE NO ll b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES M YBE NO Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) Y1 in the event of an accident or upset conditions? VES MAYBE NU— Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Yam- MAYBE W Explanation: 5- T 12) Housing. Will t.:_ droprosal affect existing housing, _. 4 create a demand for additional housing? l YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for'new parking? YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YAK— MAYBE N( d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or t, movement of people and/or goods? A YES- MAYBE— NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? __ X YET— MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? V MAYBE trii— Explanation: 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) . Fire protection? YES MAYBE N5— b) Police protection? YES MAYBE NO c) Schools?X YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities . including roads? X YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? X YES FITYITsf NO Explanation:. 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in : a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YES MAYBE N6- b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require Xthedevelopmentofnewsourcesofenergy? YES MAYBE 0— Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? X YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? 3, YES M YBE NO c) Water? f YES MAYBE NO 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? JC YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage? X YES MAYBE WO— f) Solid waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X Vim— MAYBE TO-- Explanation: 18) ,Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES MMAYBE Ta— r Explanation: i 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? VEB MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: ji /' 's gned) S /1//e eN v L% name printefd) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 ND OF FILE FILE TITLE 4 . "