Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA85-007
CI 3_ J ID u..) tit III 4 it i bl A4„,:. 44 340W Yr 4 sc,&LE .GO\V, t.\\OT 2 i 5G. coe. ' 1 TKu V., 6.L., 2 0 _________ E-W OF SECTION 5 ;3e, i •••• •• IT. li E GaRf I. GOV. L_ Ir 0 1/4. PORTION OF LAKE VIEW IE30L.)LEvARV VAG 4TE-C) r i 1 3\r IkIG Ca COM M RS i C. t \ t t 1111% 1000. 0 . zs ,• _•.., • NJ tIII*•.,4S.Il II 'T Ir lity ,c&erli 7/ : Vg.9 i 4=0 gC J4ir,e.)' , A 5 .•vH,s-t 'avA' - s.. 1.... _...... ........... MANNA L DODOS ENGINEERS INC.1 IANDINc.--7 c., ,...,c; i-,, AVL-r4LIE rvt:11,4., • 1E.1.':-..;r i F,I-.1 1 E-`,),_,E- \Al.-It-it-W..1G ri :(ki 9 El• ;t.7, VW •(5.4., ../.../AVVe“........W MO.,.... r t'Ir.1 12 3.12: :..r„ . ,,, — I 1917 c_rz)uNTY RD. VACATION 1010 I 4._ Transamerica illtre Transamerica Title Insurance Company 111111 ' Title Services Please address correspondence to the office checked below: BELLEVUE MAIN FACTORIA 10635 N E 8th St Park Place 12400 S E 38th St Boa 1493 6th Ave tt.University WA 98101 St Bellevue WA498006 Bellevue.WA 98009 0 206)451-7301 206)628-4676 Seattle(206)628-4654 Transamerica Title Insurance Co . our Order No. 714651 P . 0. Box 1493 Bellevue , WA 98009 Your Order No. ATTN : Linda Ekstrand Lotto/Phinney-Lincoln Properties FOURTH REPORT PRELIMINARY COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Washington Land Title Association Form Amount Premium Sales Tax Total X) Owner's full coverage 1 , 150 ,000. 00 $3 , 209 . 00 259 . 93 $3 ,468 .93 Purchaser's standard coverage Mortgagee's standard coverage Mortgagee's ALTA coverage Tax Registration Total Date: February 7 , 1985 at 8 : 00 A.M. 3 ,468 . 93 TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY agrees to issue on request and on recording of any appropriate documents, its policy or policies as applied for, with coverage as indicated, based on this pre-liminary commitment that title to the property described herein is vested on the date shown above in as hereto attached - subject only to the exceptions shown herein and the terms, conditions and exceptions contained in the policyform. This report and commitment shall have no force or effect except as a basis for the coverage specified h_rein. By org Wils Title Officer Description: 451-7 3 2 0) as hereto attached - continued - HIBIT EM NO , 1.0i L: . nvestrga(ion shou?d be made tirriiirmine if there are any service, installation, maintenance, CZ or construction charges for sewer,water or electricity. 2.In the event this transaction fails to close, a cancellation fee will be charged for services rendered in accordance with our rate schedule. Form No.W-K-734 Order No . 714651 FOURTH REPORT February 7 , 1985 VESTED IN: MARJORIE LOTTO and THE HEIRS AND DEVISEES OF M. W. LOTTO , deceased, as to Tracts 357 and 358 ; (See Note 1) and in LESLIE W. EASTMAN, presumptively subject to the community interest of his spouse , VIRGINIA EASTMAN , and THE HEIRS AND DEVISEES of RICHARD H. SHORETT, deceased ; as to that portion within Government Lot 3 ; (See Note 3) and in THE HEIRS AND DEVISEES of ANNA PHINNEY, deceased, as to the remainder; (See Note 4) A Order No . 714651 FOURTH REPORT February 7 , 1985 DESCRIPTION : All cf tracts 340 , 341 , 343 and vacated tract 342 , C . D. Hillman' s Lake Washington Garden of Eden Division No . 5 , according to the plat thereof , as recorded in Volume 11 of plats , page 83 , records of King County, Washington; also, those portions of tracts 357 , 358 and vacated tract 359 , as shown on said Plat , and of Government Lot 3 , Section 5 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East , W.M. lying Easterly of the Easterly margin of Lake Washington Boulevard North, North of the North line of said Lot 359 and West of the West line of Lake View Boulevard (AKA 104th Avenue S .E . ) as shown on said plat; also that portion of Lake View Boulevard (AKA 104th Avenue S .E . ) lying northerly of 3rd Avenue (AKA S .E. 104th Street and N. 20th Street) and southerly of the easterly production of the north line of said Government Lot 3 (AKA the east-west centerline of said Section 5) , all as vacated by King County according to Commissioner' s Journal Volume 20 , page 206 . Situate in the City of Renton , County of King , State of Washington. 3• ' ` contractors; in arriving at the amount of the lump sum: On account of 26 a doing this amount. 01 extra work for which we received nothing we think should fairly entitle us to an extension of time . At no time was the work abandoned , but it was done in face of severe weather •„ conditions, and a large amount of extra work added to .he contract work, and A —' we respcctrully request that the matter be investigated to theend that the sum of 4944;50 withheld from out final estimate be ordered paid to us . Respectfully, Booker, Kiehl & Whipple , J CHK/K By C . B . Kie$1: couu} OWN The petition of C . L . Dixon and wife , forthe vacation of a portion of the 3 -- Plat C . D . Hillman's Garden of Eden Addition, Division No . 5, filed with the e Board March 21 , 1917, and set down for hearing for May 7, 1917, at 10 o 'clock A .M s coming on regularly to be heard, sg 1mewastakenupanddulyconsidered, and it appearing to the Board that due and ,sufficient notice' of hearing had been given by publication in the official County paper , and the report of the County engineer being favorable , said petition was by unanimous vote , of the Board 4 granted , and the following described portion of plat of Hillmans Garden of Eden Addition, Division No . .5, declared vacated from and after--this date ; Lake View Boulevard lying between Blocks 359 and 342 bounded on the r Northwest by the easterly line of Road #1076 - Permanent Highway #l2a and the 4 J east and west. center section line of Section 5, Twp . 23 N :, R . 5 E ; W .M ., and on the southwest by the northerly line of Third Avenue ; Ali of Block 342 and all that portion of Block 359, lying easterly of the east right or way line of the Kenn_ydale-Renton County Road #1076 - Permanent i • Highway No . 12a . The reasonsTfor -said proposedavacatdonrereaas'`foiltats1 . . - 1st . That portion of Lake View Boulevard sought for vacation cannot be used as part of a road system or for street purposes on account or its excessive grade .1. 411, The following vouchers having been audited by the County Auditor and filed with the Board for approval , were on motion approved, Messrs Ramsay and Knudsen voting "Aye" , and Mr . Smith not voting:- ROAD FUND . PAYROLLS: 1 L uc c ., 6 1 7-ten reo iI VICINITY MAP MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS tO A LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY DEVELOPMENT 1+0 o LAME WAMM w PROJECT SITE R.E.20TR ST. ON COULONPAINS i' ,I CCCC ! MACHAEE Ieo SEATTLE Q t30 AVPROZII,,A TE EXTENT OF CLEARING ,i'/' GGG Y\ \-'> / ' \*``• O REORKART AY AND GRADING GG 0••• Y HO I LGG G i J 1 GLC ti Imo-` , V P O r° Y 0 C.P ,f,.:- ' ' ... 17S,/ 1 : 41. T' . 4. 4iS ci dit\ / 41 ., , o i EKWTBp rROPE1ITY LINE I Y It; ' V S j E R 0C T V.4.k" ,01" 1. S . \ L GE 48 1 a• ENGH C,\GG T;' e• C 000 T;;:::GOP To I C x V11Bar.. A Np1. t ;/ BUILDING SETBACK LINE TYP.- 4— 1- ---- - PROPERTY LINE TYP. 0 / 1.TR AVE.S.E. R.O.W. I RE SATE f DE R,A. LACOLAI F'ROPERTYCOWNW PROPOSED oo // STORM a S4N/TARYSEWER BELLEVLE,WAEFN-TON MOD" 6.1.9 IwoL 4100 w APPn eillallr—LIIMINIO--------- 11111;:iill/ '01% 'fir -, TICS PR GITY 12222.RHWTZ-2d7'O.u. I.4 1.0 -• , TR.-,.:Fwr I1:11 11111 IN'''Ii0,4 hoMbVN& Ku:Ar Tam- rtONEWN3 CHERRY i1'"uuu u- n Allll rlonmoc,a Nr TRIO,-FLOWERII.G r.RGO.'F-e_ W' c CONM.ROw 'hag- .AR m lz.o.c I IIIIIIIIIIIIII I o, o xo1iwtre wow.o C— h Illul360Ga1NJyN6 : CRdTIO CA r -1' °+[.it TRC:-?tRG n.IF w Na aar sr l?)"\;:; c°< Ne.rer+ 4r 111111 t1Yrh SWfl14s. i A®flCq' W' I ILY.Era TM T u.1 J ER Everett,W4 I. vt• TNu FR/CiR ApQJR E14„N R.Qo 743-1255 IIIlilllJilllllllllllllll 3 i";:..,-- MAP ARru.-ctWex, iIY,WGE _oiaNR.tiPR 'F'K E4,JUMPER 5P, N,o WAA.4.,wt GRON 91+.: Az45A X:Pa2F7`A, eeo v,,,x- f` 1 W z,4 BNacMUW1. a HfaR290 D A1-Nfnl NATbr-,ARRsterark.T+5Ra0 Mix. ALL. JI O, ,' ABM 4J17H A 2:1 5,cpe GR C?!WT'ER 5`Wi.1. IRnNG .1LRR a orftO 1 H Gruw+ coNnm,_ 1 1f{cl.5.- .,' a.' It i 3','''"/ '' it ' 40‘4f r 4144cotOA' Sk+ '!". NP;- fr ,..,04Vi 4E., 4I .•, 1,6 '' Ai' 4-. 1111 t.se . ; _ 1-41 , N1 3s 1 i------- 11 r(' +mot+1 / %:' 1, y ` 1AI- g y A c i, e ~.®r4 1/r --,7 -- O ?\r0/ ' t''\ 1. i c C` Y 0, .. ,, `- ` 9.t o. , ti 0 r 9 s4,_,,e ,. r J daa q1 o lio f&off.°^._ :,±" 1' by o ir-v,... ..11--- oliiika 1-..,.-rt fr---,,,„ ',.,,,,,--,w .,..tILP,i' - -100. ...,wt, ,,,1 --, - ' -riliko i- Ape\ edifilb 111 k§. (1 r .„,11 l....:,„.."..,,'. A,.,.' 7 e,,* XQ. t A! :.) i ^" O 1 0' GOM27JK LIhC` c IIISSwe_"e•P„-,.,Si6wA , 1, o , S s- t<ZRncN cl=w._ M t` i i,- I '0,I'D ,,,,, oe,O."-:."..- 1111111 4 — [ t4Arelf4 0.4.1',A-9\4 il:.i N 4,4 1 11ja• VV fr a`r/ ` "Illlllilllhll, C „.a k o. ie• LT. 1 Il IIISr. as l r r - I IimweeuLaSHRUBvtAarlavACMoc . 100' ROOFING TILE I ALUM. SLIDING WINDOWS AND DOORS s. CEDAR SIDING t ei sar, C rT. — A A 1-.I C z_ i. ,v,......_____ 7LLI,,,— lei - 77irlii___ L,411_7-_--ILI UP END ELEVATION I I BUILDING TYPE 1 01' 5' 10' 20' E LA IF J 1ti=11 1=I 11 =ma,M_ ,Intro m d: MET m 12In - ,.1_ f—I_ L hI I I I—_Ink I II—I— MI a li..i _ I 1111= i.a n= .,..ems Nil i = I 4, ; Imo__f1=2=VH= --=janw. 111gamm_ s I r- TYPICAL REAR ELEVATION TYPICAL FRONT ELEVATION MILBRANDT ARCHITECTS I I ROOFING TILE ALUM. SLIDING WINDOWS AND DOORS r_______,_ -......-L. 11i....,_ CEDAR SIDING 11ull K `' B T A A I B at ail LQ e END ELEVATION BUILDING_ TYPE 2 i--LA---1— or 5' 10' 20. I - - -- . _ - IuuI iI --'_ 1 II Wil I •=1 UI liie=+ '/ 1I i I\ IOW-Gig a a``rTi BI I 1I III I h EI I j_ yl 31101 it h i= =1:1W-. ' „ 1.9, s, --71 h L it I _.w. I ` ykc p`iilk _ i 4r, F 1 = _ L 4— I_"ice- TYPICAL REAR ELEVATION TYPICAL FRONT ELEVATION MILBRANDT ARCHITECTS WM CMG BLOCKING I%oi.;$4/E'iciW xz'+' i __ r+, R(TERSTATE F4o6 WEST RAT w„c.3A000M3A y/ ILA. a- -- I I It EAE6Brt 0 I Ei" $ QMT.Ir.DJ.WATIIWN, I LF,r Ol RWM AILi.H H I I a o r.N, ..•„ rw.cE aE r,ruowa tr aw II AOaWAYE.R. fir.' o.riiieG I—' - 1 t W s e i a a IIi i or s seo .'a e fK3001IN : 7y 0' EREEt:OP 9-1 I I 1 ; r o LNO. WOW LME.00 V_- uo . w oR ILJ I r' LIsmn. 4VisETWout fy'` rm.f n.w.iewMM a rM TT rea-.) 1r 11 l rRorEwrr u ___." EXIST r Sr.WATERY.r WANEO,We WATER... WA. I if.7:SI NA0a PROPOSED,o.ER.A«.«r CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT EASEMENTGO,IC.ELOCNE,O ttA n. 'T. WTI WC.KOMORI LL I„O.OE.,E V«r Ol RE z YII sr.riOwNo-cr I i',E l`t'i s Ls,r DJ PIPE EASEi[rtSTom srcnoWYOF,oNONN.EASEMENT INTERSTATE I.105 FEW W m ENT I 1 fFl tea_ 7• NaWx,ES LE,r — 1 - ' OF PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONITRucrwN EASEMENT NI ETATCIMn-(ar WVAVwAr a N wpav —/ 1 OTATTT EASEMENT A,,. f eiEw I .PGG,a. EA=EMENTTNS CENTERLINE OF 20 SECTION• TIOM. PERMANENTIII_CLEO MO EIOfAj ON EASEMENT IMpME q,EVEO.wI MN I A E.>•W- 74..7.41r I ETA,..L A'LT.mOVpE: I / Ji 77h'}EXIT. WITH CWC INI Y 1.1.T COME IlLOC.$141 WARP PPE JOINTS IT'EACH spool.Y., I X MG'"" oNc.xontWa IN I. i.11 VAUL LP TY T PER RENTON nuoAD'DEWS.I I aL-5--OUST.TELEPHONE cRWu.e.A. MIISM11111111/ GEMISB.11041 NOT FOAMS. I 1 or O.RA RATWW.Eq. C TW No fi ,V.;. I WOEOE"W iOWp,AWVCWr,PucTq«EANEM[r0 ISO IJ 1-40,---WWOPOIWO IP POWMwwrt OOyTV EASEMENT T. i L MtoOl w 8; MATCH-WE STA...Ea W-a EI![T 3 MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS 16"WATER TRANSMISSION PIPELINE AND 9 PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE e WATER MAIN PLAN RA too_RNrt rt. RENWONr Er Ault of MS/DE OWOSSSESa a' A STA.]•* 0.,EEE Ei1FEEEOYEeWE NEW,•,...WLE».E N Ixw cALtlATIMMO. SATE STD Rowe ME LF WI PIPSl 51-4 J. 1 .. nwme: a. PIMEIBURE R1K W WAN EACHSWOONSEEghON'S r e@ WRIT• roMTCN MIOIREM. • PROVIDE to Ll tf O.L MESTA.A\ A 7E KeRFELIDT POP 91.12. WIE11 c.BLOaLEto i E.RD . J TA.. Lr. . w. ELTSRDVgE c.LwEEL<K " YRDWDEBL LEW DI.POE v1641 I` R we V ME LE D.Iz oI.PIPE . 1 rE PT. 11"....y •111izcLreEOuILLDwDNBLEO. es .m a F EOL MM'T. MWE mac.uoc im1ROEemLE,z at.PIPE MA Nm45* Oil •PROVIDE LF OF 1r O.I.RYE RA;.E RLOYOE: IIIIIIIFFII T'Y,INDQ1E411010MRNcOEIC.BLOgteq E LER PROVIDEBL LF t.O.L RYE4404) II hw / 4. -- • 1 ` `. Lo3Li x5r.'°e y.,ODE: icv• WTI CONO.BLOOMED PROVIDE WO LFOY, .I PIPEE4161011bi- e:.u7.irirW .nil*.,.' R.vRO.tOE" Of rAVIO mama RA T.IA p'R PROWOE M LE OF IT Di RYERYr11E,rxts-ci.rzElW xtYl IIIII c011t.BLOCNMO RAE.D•rE.R YRO E • n RDw.,BL lFd1i WEWE Ile WOW CONC.MOCKING EIM 1541r CONC. BEND MEIMOCPAVEDNMpW rErI r te:TMR I -- MONK tM LE tl EL NW STANDARD IM .1 1 AMMADE RAC u. M' 1110YDe tt IFOF IS'OL 1ES IT in ILEISLLP,vmN 1 4 IT Ir Gi PL1IOEIELRII E/I,tI eLOOUGG TO NON,N E RAp— RDEDlmLi Ol ll D.L 111E p P.Eco E,BLVOtr DL EWE PROEM MI LE 11 IL WE ra1 T wAetwtoravwva m 4,i 3 w..Le,. MEO,ON OF LANE WxIIIINOTON BOULEVANO NORM PROVIDE,>OL WE CL CROEE RN1 i WI ARO NOWT WIN STREET.ETA D.D A.RA E.DA REDUCE MID BACK FLOW CHECK VALVE - — MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS 16"WATER TRANSMISSION PIPELINE A gear..wnsa. AND PRESSURE RELEASE VALVE MAIN PLANOSTA.l E.1E W.TOATERMARINA LANDING APARTMENTS 6AE Y4 .,. M,-..oc - c.aM . o REVISION. 0 MOPOPPAPPROVEDED1ODE"M 1 NTl ;NEE1 eF .11A E.T. 1 I 1MS t M a R!NA `.ND:Nv APARTMENTS PROPOSED WATER IMPROVEMENTS 12",WATER MAN i p_0... ,. 4. 0! 1_I Ar I LAKE WASHNGTON Nt-- v%,.' t` 8 ,ice' O' er r N "1 II— .— jr y/ 1 PROPOSED 12"WATERMAIN II, J F 1 )- . . .' • : 1[. . , . _ • , , . . _ _ E7fIBiNG ii.lA 1..—i1 NELeGtE406AM . '/ PROPOSED 16"WATERMAN MARINA LAIANG APARTMENTS 16"WATER TRANSMISSION PPELNE AND PRESSURE RELEASE VALVE IniN :„.. "".rn ro. ..v.an .r •.... 0•TS D•l e.w. •rv+uno Km., DAM •xe.r - IQO LAND USE UNIT MIX TOTAL SITE AREA 422,532 S.F. (9.7 ACRES) 93 A UNITS (667 S.F.): 62,031 S.F. BUILDING COVERAGE 59,847 S.F. (14.2%) 36 B UNITS (842 S.F.): 30,312 S.F. ivy PAVED AREAS 99.827 S.F. (23.6%) 57 C UNITS (948 S.F.): 54,036 S.F. CONCRETE WALKS 14,062 S.F. (3.3%) 186 TOTAL UNITS 146,379 S.F. RECREATION AREA 10,800 S.F. (2.6%) DENSITY 19.1 UNITS/ACRE Iccccccc c \ s, OPEN SPACE 237,216 S.F. (56.3%) eo o?t. 150 APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF CLEANUP !'. c O 140 i MO SPADING --''' c°a - ., T. r PARKING VICINITY MAP 197 STANDARD 72 COMPACT LAKE WASHINGTON i Occ v I 10 HANDICAP PROJECT SITE o c° i\•'' 279 TOTAL STALLS (1.5 : 1) N.E.30Tx Br. G4 GENE COULON Q BEACH PARK-- 1 C p0' 'S- 70 1 ,1 G •BERME 1 T. I 61. POENq 2. 10. s''' ." 4 I 4111*...P: Ho' d k \ i RENTON 7,, A1 ,1 9 `A T.A L- y\ y( IA 4.: . }'D^I \,-:‘..-\ WI( 440V1 \ "(- I..... '1 EXISTING PROPERTY LINE r 1 1 GG c tB Cc c . C 7N r 1 T 4 eo114BUILOWGSETBACKLINETTF. lost A V fie. `4`.`O t01Tx AYE.E.E. __. PROPERTY LINE rn. yart' NO"w P i 2 //\/J L /ec /- SITE PLAN MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS A LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY DEVELOPMENT NORTH 60 186 UNITS 279 PRK'G SPACES SHOWN MILBRANDT/BARKER ARCHITECTS 1" : 40' BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE alc31 ICROFILMED 5 / OO785. r Public Notice ;,t ; Public Notice Public Notice NOTICE OF feet; located at the northeast corner of Plan and to complete an on-going process ENVIRONMENTAL Maple Valley Highway and Interstate High- of revising the entire Zoning Code; the DETERMINATION way 405. subject regulations will apply City-wide. ENVIRONMENTAL CITY OF RENTON, POLICY DE- Further information regarding this action REVIEW COMMITTEE VELOPMENT DEPARTMENT(ECF-014- is available in the Building end Zoning RENTON,WASHINGTON 85) Department, Municipal Building, Renton, t The Environmental Review Committee Manufacturing Park Zoning Regulations. Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of 7 "=`3) ERC) has issued a declaration of non- The subject project proposes changes to ERC action must be filed with the King y--% significance for the following projects: the M-P Zone to implement City policy as CountySuperior Court byFebruary25, I r+P x-..-- 1nLINCOLNPROPERTYCOMPANYexpressedintheValleyComprehensive1985. N.C., INC. (ECF-007-85) Plan and to complete an on-going process Published in the Daily Record Chronicle, c Application for site plan approval to allow of revising the entire Zoning Code; the February 11, 1985. R9694. Ftheconstructionofamulti-family complex subject regulations will apply City-wide. totalling 186 units,having 17 buildings and CITY OF RENTON, 'POLICY DE- i ., a building for management and recreation, VELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (ECF-015- file SA-007-85;located on the east side of 85) Lake Washington Boulevard North at the Office Park Zoning Regulations.The sub- 2000 block.ject project proposes changes to the O-P B THE LUCKEY COMPANY (VICTORIA Zone to make the zone more useful City- i'`"` HILLS P.U.D.)(ECF-008-85)wide and to implement the Valley Corn- Application for preliminary P.U.D.approval prehensive Plan and to complete an on- f'':t`r to allow a multi-family complex having 196 going process of revising the entire Zoning units on approximately 16.47 acres of Code; the subject regulations will apply . O property comprising 19 buildings and a City-wide. a) .0 Y 0- management office and a recreation cent- CITY OF RENTON, POLICY DE- P .2 . o er, tile PPUD-008-85;located south of S. VELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (ECF-016- J 0 .0 0 bD Puget Drive and west of Benson Road S. 85) o a` CO C and north of S.26th Street.Heavy Industry Zoning Regulations. The v .b p' DKB CORPORATION(ECF-011-85) subject project proposes revisions to theH- 0 a) cz a ro o Application for site plan approval to allow 1 Zone to implement City policy as 3 N ca iD the construction of an office/warehouse expressed in the Valley Comprehensive 0 3 C building having approximately 110,000 Plan and to complete an on-going process C a o .0 square feet on a 6.2 acre site(North Valley of revising the entire Zoning Code; the O ce O -, on cuBusinessPark),file SA-011-85;located on subject regulations will apply City-wide.cvs the east side of West Valley Road at CITY OF RENTON, POLICY DE- ' E o o v 3 i. H c b fa.approximately the 3900 block. VELOPMENT DEPARTMENT(ECF-017- al PI aQ)) 0NIELSON & SMITH, ARCHITECTS 85) C -O•,-I I. l cn q AND PLANNERS(ECF-012-85) Light Industry Zoning Regulations. The bn.9. E w I 1 s. b0 Application for building permit to allow the subject project proposes revisions to the L- =0., tj d 4°, C U construction of a 2-story office/retail- 1 Zone to implement City policy as Lz+-P 0L7 Quo warehouse building having 11,984 square expressed in the Valley Comprehensive o i cn r'o .. O 3 Q w cam. cn r, 0.4 tac a) to 11) s, ham) p 0 '+' p'.o v ate+r-{ C a) ccIkka,. o a) C C I.,' cn x. S . Z cti .4 O3 ; CO O O M f 1 c 4 a c0 : o -1:1 ° a) roAu) oo ° cc4 w o a) 0 q d°, o a a) to C4 tat)5 0 al w rA oDov a) >. aoi4 0 3 cn n . Uo _ °0) Z^ CO am v aImill V a) 3 a. a) ocn cn 0Aa o d I C a) tea • •., 1 C o i C C) 69 U o o' O 8m<4 C a) C Q ],w CCcP' .C v) by c . r ti rG A ci 0 A o E .F U C , E. °-D C cn O E. va) cn AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Audrey DeJoie , being first duly sworn on oath states that RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER he/she is the Chief Clerk of the RENTON,WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING VALLEY NEWSPAPERS EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RE- Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News NTON, WASHINGTON ON MARCH 12, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE Daily newspapers published six(6) times a week.That said newspapers FOLLOWING PETITIONS: PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Application for site plan approval to remod- months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published el the interior of an existing warehouse in the English language continuallyas dailynewspapers in Kingbuildingce with and to1 square feetw of new gKent, office space,add 110 new parking County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal stalls on the subject site, file SA-014-85; newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for located at 33 S.W. Street. DKB CORPORATION King County. Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of an office/warehouse building having approximately 110,000 The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News square feet on a 6.2 acre site(North Valley BuJournal , DailyRecord Chronicle u DailyGlobe News the easts Park),file Sest Valleyl on tandtheeastsideofWestValleyRoadat not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its approximately the 3900 block. Lsubscribersduringthebelowstatedperiod. The annexed notice aINC. COLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C., 2a c;t 1-e of 'ub 1 i e :lea r 11 was published Application for site plan approval to allow d the construction of a multi-family complex totaling 186 units,having 17 buildings andona•.a r-c h 1 t 1985 7.97 20 a building for management and recreation, file SA-007-85;located on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North at the 2000 block. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and sum of $32.'j •Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 12, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M. TO60EXPRESSTHEIROPINIONS. Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director Published in the Daily Record Chronicle Subscribed and sworn to before me this -€;_a day of 4J14i_-ch19 March 1, 1985. R9728 2 'e4-4/ Notary Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, i l r t"'p ,.' f King County, Washington. h + t.. rg n VN i87 Revised 10l84 L ., !APR 15 1985 c° if:r- - 4!)').2.)a.. K._5 \ eiENTON BUILDING PERMIT G & ZONING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION Q_-v 1-2- -e2A 40 0c)`1 - ppRESS OF PROPERTY N TRUCTION THIS DEPARTMENT WILL ASSIGN ADDRESS)IF NEW CONSTRUCTION, TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION TO BE PERFORMED CA c itC 7 "1_' ' 7kli L l VALUE OF CONSTRUCTION IS: '*4 1-I/ Li '75()C.) (r' KING COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER FOR PROPERTY MAY BE FOUND ON PROPERTY TAX STATEMENT OF TITLE PAPERS)1 LEGA L DESCRIPTION PLEASE SUBMIT ON _SEPARATE $ x 11 SHEET OF PRPEF ( ,t7`t`e,` i OWNER OF PROPERTY fl rir 14c'4- E5 Eck L/ lasso,, 77/iY.-4 C/ t) L /hC'ilPI I?r.IHoNE ('2c ) 45 S - LI4/3 CITY/STATE C L Jj ZIP t `' STREET ADDRESS If qtr) S (iL' CIA( e e.(irI I,I 1 p (, PHONE t.5" S/ CONTACT PERSON l I rl r rj C" CONTRACTOR /: r> >/2C 4 e PHONE `IDS"' Y£s/ S STREET ADDRESS P c WO C)- 6 f L -a;;k_ 2() CITY/STATE Ih'V ,tf ' ZIP%"CC'( CONTRACTOR'S STATE LICENSE NUMBER P/-7 /'L /- 223 t V RENTON BUSINESS LICENSE NUMBER 7 / 6/6 TAX NUMBER C- 4C J 1 `I 5_C'1--- IF TENANT SPACE, LIST: TENANT NAME, TYPE OF BUSINESS, SUITE NUMBER) Const Type Bld Sq Ft Use District Elec Service Flood PI Elev Low Fl Elev Sewer/Septic Vacant Site Flood Proof El wired Site Coy Shell of Bld Sprinkler Reg CO Re q Temp Days Revocable Rev Days Spec Restr Temporary Occ Group Occ Load Height Limit Dwelling Count Park Count StoryCount Misc Code I Misc Code 2 I certify that the information on this application furnished by me is true and correct and that the applicable requirements of the CITY OF RENTON will be met. I understand that this application is valid for six months from the application date. If a permit is not issued during this time period, the application will become void. This application does not constitute a permit to work. Work is not to commence until building permit is posted on premises where work is to be under perform d applicationpublic rights-of-way and/or utility easements are not authorized PERMIT FEE $ INVESTIGATION FEE $ OTHER FEE $ PLAN CHECK $3DRAINA5E PLAN CHECK $ 5ti SEPA FEE $ RECEIPT lif11 76 DATE Z "Y SIGNATURE f`L. /> 4% 1 4 11 I 009- OF R4 ,4 4 c) 4$ r . 1, z BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR z p9 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 O9 TE0 SEW1-00 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR April 19, 1985 Leonard J. Milbrandt Milbrandt, Barker Architects 11715 S.E. 5th Street Suite 100 Bellevue, Wa. 98005 RE: MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS Dear Len: Reviewing your letter of April 18, 1985, the five proposed changes are minor in scope and acceptable within the approved plans for Marina Landing. However, I again wish to stress our concern over the location of the sports court. We would like to see revised plans showing a more central location. Sincerely, C). X(1. Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:plp CITY OF i,ENTC'1 April 18, 1985 APR 1 81°85 BIJ;L :;NG%ZONING DEPT. City of Renton Building Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Attn : Roger Blaylock Re : Marina Landing Apartments Site Plan Modification Dear Roger: In accordance with our conversation today, I have prepared this letter to accompany the enclosed site plan. The purpose of this letter is to notify the city of minor modifications that have been made and to confirm that these changes can be made administratively. The changes are for the most part minor. These revisions include : 1 . Increase of setback for Building #2 along Lake Washington Boulevard . 2 . Relocation of carports for improved proximity to dwelling units. 3. Minor shifts in building and carport locations to accommo- date building separations required by the Fire Department. 4 . The driveway between Buildings #14 and #15 has been moved north and Building #15 moved south next to Building #14 . This has been done because of concern about the steep slope next to the former building location of #15. 5. Building types have switched location in some instances to accommodate handicapped requirements . These modifications have been made in the interest of producing a better development . Most of these changes will improve the relationship of development with the slope areas . MILBRANDT, BARKER ARCHITECTS 11715 S.E. 5TH STREET, SUITE 100, BELLEVUE, WA. 98005 C206) 454-7130 EDWARD C. ARMSTRONG, ASSOCIATE April 17 , 1985 City of Renton Page Two I want to thank you for your cooperation on this . We have enjoyed and look forward to a continuing working relationship with the planning staff at Renton. Sincerely , MILB ANDT , BARKER ARCHITECTS Le nard J . Milbrandt Partner cc : Scott Springer Roy Lewis (Dodds Engineers) OF R4Ir. tti 4-. z THE CITY OF RENTON k ,. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 taa " P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9 O FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 Q, 04P4TECSEPk April 8, 1985 Mr. John Phillips 2001 Western Avenue, Suite #555 Seattle, Washington, 98121 RE: File. No. SA-007-85; Lincoln Property Co. N.C., Inc. Dear Mr. Phillips: The Examiner's Report regarding the referenced application which was published on March 22, 1985 has not been appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for f.ling. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner FJK:dk 0842 cc: City Clerk Building & Zoning Department AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of King DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 22nd day of March 1985, affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this &(94d1 day of 1985. Notary Public and for the State of Washington, residing at therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: SA-007-85 - LINCOLN PROPERTIES The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) 0822 March 22, 1985 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C., INC. FILE NO. SA-007-85 LOCATION: East side of Lake Washington Boulevard North at the 2200 block. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Site Plan approval to allow construction of a multi-family complex totaling 186 units in 17 buildings, and a building for management and recreation. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions Hearing Examiner Decision: Approved with conditions. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT:received by the Examiner on March 5, 1985. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on March 12, 1985, at 9:45 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow file containing proof of posting, application, series of clarification notes from applicant dated February 5th and February 8th, 1985, and other documents pertinent to this proposal. Exhibit #2 - Site Plan. Exhibit #3 - Landscape Plan Exhibit #4 - Five (5) sheets containing legal description and survey map. The Zoning Administrator, Roger Blaylock, began a review of the staff report, but first entered the above exhibits into the record. He continued with his report stating the 186 units proposed are to be housed in 17 buildings. The property is in two ownerships, and is bisected by N.E. 20th Street. The larger portion had been known as the golf driving range and the southern portion has been vacant for many years. The Hearing Examiner asked that the question of proper title and ownership be clarified before the hearing continued. Mr. Blaylock began the clarification requested by the Examiner, and Mr. John Phillips, representing the applicant wished to speak regarding the title question. Speaking for the record was: John Phillips, representing Lincoln Properties 2001 Western Avenue Suite #555 Seattle, Washington, 98121 Mr. Phillips presented the Examiner with a copy of the title report received from Transamerica Title Insurance Company and a copy of the actual document vacating the street, together with a drawing prepared by a surveyor showing the location of the property in question. These documents were entered as Exhibit #4. Continuing, Mr. Phillips stated all of the property shown on the Site Plan is legally owned and can be purchased by Lincoln Properties. He discussed a small area abutting west of Lot 341 which was questionable as to its vacation. There had been a question of where the Lincoln Property Company, 1 __ SA-007-85 March 22, 1985 Page 2 east/west centerline of Secton 5 was located because originally it was thought the line was at the lower half of the property when in fact it has been proven that the line is at the northern edge. The Title Company has now assured the applicant that the street has been vacated. Mr. Phillips stated the Title Company as well as Lincoln Properties always requires a Survey Title Policy which guarantees the actual location of the property involved. The Hearing Examiner accepted this clarification of ownership, and Mr. Blaylock continued with the staff report. It was noted the subject property is approximately 9.7 acres and complies with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. The site is bordered on the west by Lake Washington Blvd. which is the sole access for the property. N.E. 20th Street is a dead end street that would be constructed to come off Lake Washington Blvd. to service the site. Site Plan approval was a part of the rezone for this property and existing zoning for the property is R-3. A 16 inch water line will have to be upgraded from the north and east to bring the fire flow necessary to serve the site. Gene Coulon Park will provide much of the outside recreational amenities for the site. The applicant has included a painted crosswalk to the northern entrance of Gene Coulon Park. The requirements, and subsequent compliance of ERC conditions were discussed with emphasis on dedication of property along Lake Washington Blvd.; widening of Lake Washington Blvd.; off-site improvements; and improvements to various streets. Parking provided on-site will be 279 spaces with no guest parking provided. Recreation concerns were discussed and Mr. Blaylock responded stating centralized recreational facilities will be provided, but the ERC was concerned that no outdoor recreational area was provided. Since that time the applicant has advised, by letter, that they will also provide for site plan review, an outdoor sports court facility on the site. Another issue discussed was the Fire Department requirement for a secondary emergency access, and whether the secondary access should be converted into a secondary access to the site. It was felt this requirement could ultimately affect the construction design of the project. He stated N.E. 20th Street may be vacated at some point in the future, depending upon how access is provided to the adjacent properties to the east. It was felt an emergency access could be constructed that would link to Lake Washington Blvd., or link up with the mobile home park through some sort of an easement. It was felt there may be approximately 1100 vehicle trips per day generated from the site, and with the left turn pocket at N.E. 20th Street there does not appear to be a need to introduce another driveway onto Lake Washington Blvd., which is an arterial. With no further staff comments, Mr. Blaylock recommended approval of the proposal, subject to conditions set out in the staff report. The Hearing Examiner called for testimony in support of the application from the applicant or their representative. Responding for the applicant was: John Phillips 2001 Western Avenue #555 Seattle, Washington, 98121 Mr. Phillips addressed the Examiner requesting approval of the proposal, and reviewed some of the background contained in the staff report. He reiterated the site plan had previously been approved; is on 9.7 acres and provides for 186 units of multiple family housing. The R-3 zone allows 243 units. They have provided significant open space for the greenbelt area. The question of sufficient water has been clarified and final plans now show there will be more than sufficient water available for fire flow through the site. He continued stating the development will cater to people who only have one vehicle; over half of the units will be one bedroom; one covered parking facility for each unit will be provided with the other 50% of the parking stalls available for guests or second car households. It is felt the transit system will be utilized by many of the residents as there will be a bus pull-out/parking area provided at the site. Regarding the emergency access issue, Mr. Phillips stated they feel there are actually two access areas to the site - one on No. 20th Street which will be developed by the applicant and one to the south which will come in to No. 20th Street about 80 to 100 ft.. He said there really are several entrances from the street - 2 from Lake Washington Blvd. and 5 from No. 20th Street. He sees no major problem involving the issue of fire emergency access. He suggested language change for condition #2 of the departmental recommendation in the staff report. He feels the condition should read "Provision for emergency access to the northern portion of the site per approval of the Fire Department." He believes there is already sufficient access provided to the site. Mr. Phillips reviewed the recreational facilities to be provided, the landscaping plans and slope protection. With these comments, he requested approval. Lincoln Property Company, '...__ SA-007-85 March 22, 1985 Page 3 The Hearing Examiner commented on an ERC concern regarding the asthetics of the proposal with regard to the buildings going straight across the site. Addressing this concern was the Zoning Administrator, Roger Blaylock. He stated this had been a concern of staff also, but there have been photos presented by the applicant which show the use of a landscape theme, different colors and trim, as well as the use of vegetation on the site that can be used to enhance the appearance of the buildings as well as their surroundings. The Examiner again called for testimony in support of or in opposition to this application. There was no one else wishing to speak. Calling for staff comments, Mr. Blaylock advised that staff has a concern regarding the limited access onto Lake Washington Blvd. and the topography to the east. It is felt there should be a provision or requirement at the time of site approval stating if and when the property to the north is developed, easements be obtained for fire access thereby linking the two sites. He felt this would be beneficial to both parties as there is no access from the east and limited access on Lake Washington Blvd. With the existing topography, he felt this was a reasonable condition. There being no further comments, the hearing was closed at 10:25 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1.The applicant, Lincoln Properties, Inc., has requested approval of a site plan for a 17 building, 186 unit multi-family unit complex. 2.The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents was entered in the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.2IC, 1971, as amended), a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5.There was no opposition to the subject proposal from any member of the public. 6. The subject site is located on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North at the approximately 2000 block, and is the site of the golf driving range. 7.The adoption of Ordinance 1791, in September, 1959 annexed the majority of the subject site into the City. Amendment which followed in October and December of 1959 (Ordinances 1800 and 1804) completed the annexation of the subject site. The R-1 zoning of the subject site was changed to R-3 with the adoption of Ordinance 3878 in January of this year (1985). 8.The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of high and medium density multi-family development as well as greenbelt uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 9.The applicant proposes constructing 17 multi-family buildings containing 186 dwelling units. In addition, a separate building will contain management offices and recreational facilities. 10. The proposal will straddle N. 20th Street, which will provide primary access to the larger northern portion of the project. Access to the 3 building southern portion will be off of Lake Washington Blvd, with a through parking lot connecting to N. 20th. This through parking area/driveway is proposed to serve as the secondary emergency access to the 14 building northern portion via a staggered driveway configuration. (See Map detail). Lincoln Property Company, _..__ SA-007-85 March 22, 1985 Page 4 11. Access to the northern parcel will be provided by four separate entry drives off of N. 20th Street. Topographical constraints limit meaningful access to either the east or north. 12. The buildings will be 30 feet in height, each containing three floors per unit. Two building types are proposed although the variations between the designs are minor at best. Three of the structures will be half units. 13. Parking will be provided per ordinance, with some of the parking within carports. No additional parking for guests will be provided and no storage for boats or trailers is provided on the subject site. 14. On-street parking is limited, and during certain periods parking is prohibited along Lake Washington Blvd. 15. The buildings are proposed to be configured across the slope in rows, with parking between the rows in the larger northern parcel. The 3 buildings in the southern parcel will be set at an angle to one another to accomodate the buildings on the triangular shaped parcel. 16. The recreational building will accommodate a spa type complex, along with a movie theater. A swimming pool will be located adjacent to the recreation complex, and the applicant has proposed placing an active sports court on the site in reaction to staff comments. 17. Coulon Beach Park is located immediately southwest of the subject site and residents of the proposed complex are expected to utilize that facility. 18. The buildings will be set back from the property line approximately 30 feet. The actual roadway for Lake Washington Blvd is approximately 20 additional feet from the subject site. Landscaping will be placed in the various setbacks to screen the site from Lake Washington Blvd. Each of the buildings will be surrounded by a combination of shrubs and bedding materials. N. 20th Street will also receive landscaping treatment. 19. The eastern portion of the site which consists primarlily of steep sloped areas will be preserved in natural vegetation as required by the ERC. Supplemental landscaping as necessary may be added. 20. The applicant has provided title documents which would appear to indicate ownership of those portions of the site proposed for develpment. CONCLUSIONS 1.The proposed project appears to make full use of those portions of the subject site suitable for building, while preserving the steep easterly portions of the subject site. 2. The development will increase the tax base of the City, while offering additional residential opportunites for those who would like to live close to the shores of Lake Washington. 3.The site's location almost adjacent to Coulon Park also offers a unique opportunity for residents to enjoy that large and unique amenitiy. 4.The proposed access to the subject site appears to provide for an almost independent secondary access for emergency vehicles, but the plan should be approved by the Fire Department. 5.The proposed recreational facilities on the subject site, pool, spa, movie theater and active sports court, when coupled with the proximity of Coulon Park, appear to satisfy the recreational needs of the residents. 6.This office can't help but note that the site is one of the premier sites in the city of Renton, and while steeper portions of the site have been preserved, the site is being developed to the maximum with basically four tiers of structures running parallel to each other in a rather unimaginative fashion. The buildings do not particularly relate to one another around a landscaped court or the recreational facility. The configuration provides little relief in the form of setback or juxtaposition vis-a-vis each other. The landscaping may soften the effect but the generally unrelieved walls of 30 foot tall buildings will not present the most attractive appearance. Nor will there be much relief from the similarity of the structures. There is little, if any, architectural difference in the buildings, their size, style or appearance. Lincoln Property Company, I. SA-007-85 March 22, 1985 Page 5 7. Further, the landscaping will more than likely be held to a minimum in height in order to preserve views from the rows of apartment buildings, so that whatever relief was intended will probably be down-played. These comments echo similar comments expressed by the Environmental Review Committee and were placed in the record to place the applicant on notice that the site is significant and should be developed pursuant to the plan in as sensitive a manner as is possible, and maintained in a similar fashion. Obviously the Comprehensive Plan and zoning permits intense development, and the proposal takes full advantage of the zoning. DECISION The site plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval by the Fire Department of the access plan for the subject site. 2. The inclusion of an active sports court on the subject site. 3. Approval of the landscape plans for all aspects of the subject site including the landscape treatment along Lake Washington Blvd, along the steep slope areas of the site, and for all interior portions of the subject site. ORDERED THIS 22nd day of March, 1985. FRED J. K U MAN HEARING E AMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 22nd day of March, 1985 to the parties of record: John Phillips 2001 Western Avenue, Suite #555 Seattle, Washington, 98121 TRANSMITTED THIS 22nd day of March, 1985 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before April 5, 1985. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. Lincoln Property Company, I __ SA-007-85 March 22, 1985 Page 6 All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. I f i; 1 1 f-r-z--. vt...42 .1. ler t l A 2 V. o v iv P\ P‘Xciiii P G° wwMwwMlWOr mMw.- roMKTar.uownMt MI WONT. e ? twa..T rurw _ - li 1'+'iW,iY wow....oRrs WWI. Fit ..7Ri,-__ MOWN TKVu_r! twnM V r..l P. - fi r-- MOWN MO V OW If W w. lieliAl Mi 4 ww.Myww.w IMMO MI LP r.a MI_ ru tY OII.O.I W.OoeO V ' jAOAwVRYY w. r Ake., ... . I t4r 44 40:°r rif IOflit" MOM.MOM.wvrua.w 7.---'''. 41;107 4444.h. 44124) ..0 /j 1 or SOW OW O WI mWc.as aaw41/4) 54 111:211111" oar I 7 r ww.T r nu.w r.Mla.rwOw r4to ^ I iiif., :TtLw was Avw.r saMw KMM.oae.K.tti. TN\Sl1.KT AwMKw.;twfl.w VOrYtw Cisr.l,O P.Yoc.i M t R.a.gwat, tM.iacaw.Accv~i. rn.„ 16454 *Pa 1111111111 16454 iA+T1Y w. KO.a...Yw t Tri asrsilr: MOAN e.'oC 1 r COW KL r EtW.W..I: W.ow WM V r V.G.w 3 _ 4/ . 4 wtiKamm AVI t..`i: w_ L-IIaO.w R r.1 TT A.OA.O i.i.a.TT T Cl TUC Tu1wA.lO ti.0 NORM j wT.a>hv mwT - rnwn 114t- — I wMwlnO r LAW 1w0011,11201101011.00.M1. / Mica nMOoOW.tM OW 0I0.1.011.SWIM.no••w..•o.••w.-• N.....NO maCKWAM MM... tr WATER TRANlWSO M PIPELINE WOW.>w.Mww AND PRE$EURE RELEASE VALVE WOW.WM TM R...A W.TO r.WIA uWWooq.I.PtUtw11 MSMllomilSy .:...«. w .. ..., ..T a« Vr 1I w • I. Y•V"Ill-11•10iTi kf i i ill" 1. :; !at ' C.I DUE 044Q_ 0 ,'.111II ELFMITRY VvT1iFriviri Ill 7 .ar'T--- , I 4.0 t5'l'L ,1 t1t\ 1 '1. i. 1 t•o t 7 2 tt 2.111 tea .• I' • . 1 kIr' sir • T , 4 z'la tk 2 2! DONS 0. 1 1,=1 I PARK od p UMW' , , °‘-'1' i m , , . l i, ,\, disu r s ze+ z75 Zia z9!. a 'Q° t l l e M Hi la 1 o III..._.. 4 V.'S 1 tl`j ,26157 J 245 1/j4 225 J 1 d 1/ i liii0AWS Si 2 IV.:;# '1,, . 11 7.---'M( 1-21. 2 L I• ftlAtf.**siCal rj y _ 4,.i. i+: ta t h• t„ II'I.4a z,ti R_h1 P • —7 ERNI m t.-\._‘,. . r,_ .-t . • N. Fs® e i 7i:., -,. . i„\ of _ II'caa0 I` i • : Tom_ 7 1\W',? 1 i 7ii+ . i• "" t.e,_,. 7a), 0 744, 751 728 ! 7: 4. N M'- r G—1 I / ' 1 • Has t1.D 1 z47 i raA -I4I_ z.5o 7•, A II 3 eat 1 i R-1 ; ,_!_i - 4, , , --1 . LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS SA-007-85 APPLICANT LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. TOTAL AREA - 9.7ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS LAKE WASHINGTON BVLD. NORTH EXISTING ZONING R-3, RESIDENTIAL -MULTIPLE FAMILY EXISTING USE GOLF DRIVING RANGE PROPOSED USE MULTIPLE FAMILY COMPLEX CONSISTING OF 186 DWELLING UNITS COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN HIGH DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY, LOW DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY, AND GREENBELT COMMENTS I I MANN Ma IS see..w___-__ cs eeeeAPwnIP•... i Or ww an r tlA T r.i_rre.rns- 5 TOf.mIrr. IPOMO*AP if e.PAPA--____- tf{ oo.armve II• foew ru re.ww — --._ ji4 f aws.ruw+rw.w 0 Ca1IiOeNiaiir.P iTeu TOI I.IiMrMeVP i0' I VaNr's.' reswsV Ve..ee_ 0 MewVw Oel.R 44 Vale,,':•140111 1 - 1r// T. ti Ttl P.il me eaten r.ea.v'"rw—___., Nam, 110 airKJ10.- Anilr et-P,IP9. T e.OreareYP V 1l t 14424 r . Is wsAete 0API I *Mal 8 r MAMA ewwnu.w eT PAVINIMINIMIS ru.wu fil 1ar`W r. ` fitr-fin vim" ... n IN\ ` //Ow. ssO in II e,iw Il rv l nu . ..1f Ca IW.I.y , TC....r l wrsewvswuw r Cl.s•r eeA irra re w.'w eefc ewt IR:4 . int....,,,,.-azra,,,, 0;4 IF41141 *MAI t•... re.4w.e.eO Pa..tar3`WT rw _ r.21..:` inaarsons r m.c. awoourOTe6l.haw lT PwerA' i.....Vsir ea..e J r .wr,,Al rrw ... i1 owa MY SOS we Ire,r O.wVw.n ve..ee J rigor nn.p wuw wwrw ru wuo n.e r.O anraeTo oti enO aac n000w 411. rON Wg1MOroTeRy.11 Y I_. l f.w n T...e+e_ M.[IP w.Ar NMrAe eereyM Ow. Nr.AV W OM TrN ew r..M am an Ms noT-eTAM re-nA.•re-/ I .r.IT Ca ia..o FMCS yawn-_ MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS 16 WATER TRANSMISSION PIPELINE MIR•O.r 1p. AND PRESSURE RELEASE VALVE _ wry STA.l.M..TO WAWA UA.TP VMTw.fTe' 1 yrw.r .• ..... .... nw vwll.rw...!KWe ]I . awl r.... .. I 1 u, fK I I Rc C E SS b3-w t S t3,„ Set.4-) 117 MAR 6 "1985 LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY March 4, 1985 Mr. Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: MARINA LANDING Dear Roger: I am enclosing a copy of the legal description as approved by Transamerica Title on their most recent report. I am also enclosing a copy of my previous letter to you dated February 8, 1985. Yours truly, 524,t > Scott B. Springer Vice President SBS:jp Enclosures 11400 S.E. 6th Street Suite 220 Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 455-4813 1 LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY 1 .fig ri February 8, 1985 MAR 6 1985 Mr. Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: MARINA LANDING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Dear Roger: Per our telephone discussion, please be advised that we will agree to install a sport court facility on our Marina Landing project. It is my understanding that this recreational upgrade, together with the other matters set forth in my previous letter dated February 5, 1985, will enable the Environmental Review Committee to issue its Memorandum of Concurrence for our project. Yours truly, r Scott B. Springer Vice President SBS:jp 11400 S.E. 6th Street Suite 220 Bellevue. WA 98004 (206) 455-4813 Title Insurance Company 111 Title Services Please address correspondence to the office checked below: BELLEVUE MAIN FACTORIA Fp) I r7 r 10635 N.E.8th St. Park Place 12400 S.E.38th St l 1 Boy 1493 6th Ave.at University St. Bellevue.WA 98006 i , t Bellevue.WA 98009 Seattle.WA 98101 206)644-4130 206)451-7301 206)628-4676 MAR 6 19R5Seattle(206)628-4654 r Transamerica Title Insurance Co. Our Order No. 71C}651"' ' ";n)r; P . 0. Box 1493 Bellevue , WA 98009 Your Order No. ATTN: Linda Ekstrand Lotto/Phinney-Lincoln Properties FOURTH REPORT PRELIMINARY COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Washington Land Tide Association Form Amount Premium Sales Tax Total X) Owner's full coverage 1 , 150 ,000 . 00 $3 ,209 .00 259 .93 $3 ,468 .93 Purchaser's standard coverage Mortgagee's standard coverage Mortgagee's ALTA coverage Tax Registration Total Date: February 7 , 1985 at 8 :00 A.M.3,468 . 93 TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY agrees to issue on request and on recording of any appropriate documents, its policy or policies as applied for, with coverage as indicated, based on this pre- liminary commitment that tide to the property described herein is vested on the date shown above in as hereto attached - subject only to the exceptions shown herein and the terms, conditions and exceptions contained in the policyform. This report and commitment shall have no force or effect except as a basis for the coverage specified herein. By erg WilS.9.Y1 Title Officer Description:451-7320) as hereto attached - continued - NOTE: 1.Investigation should be made to determine if there are any service, installation, maintenance, CZ or construction charges for sewer,water or electricity. 2.In the event this transaction fails to close, a cancellation fee will be charged for services rendered in accordance with our rate schedule. Form No.\Y'-K-734 0: r No . 714651 FOURTH REPORT February 7 , 1985 VESTED IN: MARJORIE LOTTO and THE HEIRS AND DEVISEES OF M. W. LOTTO, deceased, as to Tracts 357 and 358 ; (See Note 1) and in LESLIE W. EASTMAN, presumptively subject to the community interest of his spouse, VIRGINIA EASTMAN, and THE HEIRS AND DEVISEES of RICHARD H. SHORETT, deceased; as to that portion within Government Lot 3 ; (See Note 3) and in THE HEIRS AND DEVISEES of ANNA PHINNEY, deceased, as to the remainder; (See Note 4) Orc No . 714651 FOURTH REPORT February 7 , 1985 DESCRIPTION: All of tracts 340 , 341 , 343 and vacated tract 342 , C . D. Hillman' s Lake Washington Garden of Eden Division No . 5 , according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Volume 11 of plats , page 83 , records of King County, Washington; also, those portions of tracts 357 , 358 and vacated tract 359 , as shown on said Plat , and of Government Lot 3 , Section 5 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East , W.M. lying Easterly of the Easterly margin of Lake Washington Boulevard North, North of the North line of said Lot 359 and West of the West line of Lake View Boulevard (AKA 104th Avenue S .E . ) as shown on said plat ; also that portion of Lake View Boulevard (AKA 104th Avenue S .E. ) lying northerly of 3rd Avenue (AKA S .E. 104th Street and N. 20th Street) and southerly of the easterly production of the north line of said Government Lot 3 (AKA the east-west centerline of said Section 5) , all as vacated by King County according to Commissioner' s Journal Volume 20 , page 206. Situate in the City of Renton, County of King , State of Washington. 1358Z CITY OF RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 12, 1985 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.: COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS Application for site plan approval to remodel the interior of an existing warehouse building with 13,331 square feet of new office space, and to add 110 new parking stalls on the subject site, file SA-014-85; located at 333 S.W. 41st Street. DKB CORPORATION Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of an office/warehouse building having approximately 110,000 square feet on a 6.2 acre site (North Valley Business Park), file SA-011-85; located on the east side of West Valley Road at approximately the 3900 block. LINICOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C., INC. Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a mu ti-family complex totaling 186 units, having 17 buildings and a building for management and recreation, file SA-007-85; located on the east side of Lab e Washington Boulevard North at the 2000 block. 1366Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 12, 1985 APPLICANT: LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C., INC. FILE NUMBER: SA-007-85 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: I-he applicant seeks site plan approval to allow the construction of a multi-family Complex totaling 186 units, having 17 buildings and a building for management and ecreation. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1.Owner of Record: Anna Phinney, Marjorie Lotto 2.Applicant: Lincoln Property Company, N.C., Inc. 3.Location: Vicinity Map Attached)Located on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North at the 2000 block. 4. Existing Zoning: R-3, Residential - Multiple Family 5. Existing Zoning in the Area: R-1, Residential - Single Family; R-3, Residential - Multiple Family; and H-1, Heavy Industry. 6. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: High Density Multi-Familyt, Low Density Multi-Family and Greenbelt 7.Size of Property: 9.7 acres 8.Access:Lake Washington Boulevard North 9.Land Use: The subject site is used as a golf driving range. 10.Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Mobile Home Park East: Undeveloped Property South: Undeveloped Property West: Gene Coulon Park, Lake Washington C.HISTORY/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Ar nexation 1791 Sept. 8, 1959 Amended 1800 Oct. 13, 1959 Amended 1804 Dec. 8, 1961 RE zone (G-6000 to P-1) 1914 Oct. 17. 1961 Lots 340-343, 354) RE zone (G-6000 to R-1) 3634 June 13, 1982 Lots 358-357) RE zone (R-1, P-1 to R-3) R-073-84 3878 Jan. 24, 1985 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1.Utilities: a. Water: A 6-inch water line dead-ends on the subject site to service the trailer park. The line comes from a 16-inch line at the intersection of Meadow Avenue N. and N. 26th Street. PRELIMINARY REPOR I 10 THE HEARING EXAMINER LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C., INC.: SA-007-85 MARCH 12, 1985 PAGE 2 b. Sewer: An 8-inch sanitary sewer line extends along Lake Washington Boulevard North adjacent to the subject site. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water flows into the Lake Washington drainage system. 2.Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3.Transit: METRO Transit Routes #240 and #340 run adjacent to the subject property along Lake Washington Boulevard North. 4.Schools: a. Elementary Schools: Kennydale Elementary School is approximately .3 miles northeast of the subject site. b. Middle_Schools: McKnight Middle School is approximately .9 miles to the southeast of the subject site. c. High Schools: Renton High School is approxiately 1.9 miles southwest of the subject site. 5. Recreation: Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park is directly across from the subject site on Lake Washington Boulevard North. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1.Section 4-709A, Residential District (R-3). F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1.Residential Goals and Objectives Policies Element, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1985, p. 14-16. 2.Northeast Renton Comprehensive Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1985, p. 55-60. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1.The applicant is requesting site plan approval to allow the construction of 186 apartment units/condominiums on a +9.7 acre site to be known as Marina Landing. The total of 17 three-story Cape Cod style buildings along with a recreational building will be developed on the site. 2.The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Declaration of Non-Significance on February 27, 1985. This corresponds to the underlying environmental review conducted at the time of the rezone request, file R-073-84. The following conditions were placed on the original Declaration of Non-significance issued for the rezone: a. Development shall be limited with the contour elevations illustrated on the site plan submitted to the Building and Zoning Department on August 3, 1984. b. Ten (10) feet of property along Lake Washington Boulevard shall be dedicated to the City for future street improvements. c. Lake Washington Boulevard is to be widened to three (3) lanes per approval of the Public Works Department. d. Lake Washington Boulevard and Lakeside entrance (Marina Landing) to provide 100% of funding for cost of installing center left-turn lane to site. e. Provide off-site improvements to Lake Washington Boulevard for the full 42 feet of right-of-way including curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, etc., abutting the property. f. Street improvements required for Burnett Avenue North and Lake Washington Boulevard North southbound merge lane on Lake Washington Boulevard from the Burnett Avenue North 300 feet L.F. at 10 L.F., 3,000 at 5.32%. The assessment due to the City of Renton at the time of building permit issue shall be $160. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINEF. LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C., INC.: SA-007-85 MARCH 12, 1985 PAGE 3 g. Street improvements required for Lake Washington Boulevard between Park Drive and Houser Way widened 800 lineal feet of Lake Washington Boulevard approximately 9 to 10 feet. Eight hundred L.F. at $8.00 per L.F $6,400 at 10.19%. This assessment due to the City of Renton at the time of building permit issue shall be $652.16. h. Street improvements required for Lake Washington Boulevard and Garden Avenue North/Park Drive North upgrade traffic signal controller for roadway widening. $15,000 at 10.19%. The assessment due to the City of Renton at the time of building permit issuance shall be $1,528.50. Total assessment amounts due of $2,340.66. It appears that all of the above conditions have been or will be complied with in the site plan presented. 3. On February 5, 1985, the applicant clarified the proposal in writing specifically delininating: (1) the market focus of the project; (2) on-site parking; (3) on-site recreation; and (4) aesthetics. The clarification helped the Environmental Review Committee understand the interrelationship of the facility and the adjacent Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. The market focus primarily provided the City with the opportunity to understand the characteristics of the typical resident at Marina Landing. The discussion concerning on-site parking was important because we recognize there was the potential for parking overflow between the subject site and the Park, and there would be no parking on the streets in the general area. In reverse, the subject site can be utilized as the parking area for the Park, which would then create an impact upon the development itself. The third concern was recreation. Even though the Environmental Review Committee accepted the discussion on the recreation, there is concern about its adequacy. On-site recreation for 186 units is provided solely in one central recreational building. Even though it includes a swimming pool, jacuzzi, suntanning room, weight room, billiard room, card room, and in-house movie system viewing area, the concern is that no active outside recreational area is provided. ISSUE: Should Coulon Park provide the active outside recreational facilities for this development? First, Coulon Park is a regional park drawing people from twenty miles away to the shores of Lake Washington. Therefore, a conflict exists when we encourage this project to utilize Coulon Park as their primary area for outside active recreational uses. This may not be totally inconsistent looking at the dramatic impact that Gene Coulon Park has on the City of Renton and, in fact, it makes the adjoining properties specifically appealable because of that reason. However, some active on-site outdoor recreation should be provided in either the form of a sports court or tennis court because of the young market population characteristics of the project proposal. 4.The applicant during construction will actually construct Lake Washington Boulevard in front of the project. In addition, they will include public transit pull-outs in the design for the roadway construction. N.E. 20th Street will be constructed to City standards to the end of the property, which basically includes full street standards for approximately the first 280 feet of length with the remaining approximately 260 feet of length to be constructed to half-street standards. This will provide the minimum primary fire access standards needed. In addition, the applicant has pointed to specific design features to increase the aesthetics and compatibility of the project with the public facilities to the east of Lake Washington Boulevard. The letter of clarification actually modifies the specific design style of the proposal by clarifying the aesthetics and intent of the developer. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C., INC.: SA-007-85 MARCH 12, 1985 PAGE 4 5.Department comments have focused primarily upon technical issues dealing with providing utilities and services to the subject site. The applicant has provided a detailed analysis of how water mains will be extended from the north from approximately the location of North 26th Street and Meadow Avenue North to the subject site. This will increase the fire flow to the subject site. Specific street improvements and landscaping treatment of the actual development will create more of a boulevard approach with the sidewalk separated from the curb so that a berm is created, and the project is generally buffered from Lake Washington Boulevard. Public Works Department has commented that they don't really wish to see any trees planted in any of the median strips which provide the left-turn pockets, but would prefer that the landscaping be placed along the east side of the right-of-way adjacent to the project. It is felt that can create the same aesthetic image of a boulevard by locating along the margins of the right-of-way. 6.The Fire Department requirement for secondary emergency access will affect the ultimate construction design of the project. The Fire Marshal has commented that the project does not have secondary emergency access at the northern end of the project. Either an emergency access road could be constructed on-site or possibly tied into the adjacent mobile home park. The F ire Marshal has consistently raised this issue because of the density of the project and the necessity for the secondary access per Code. ISSUE: Should the required secondary access for emergency vehicles be converted into a secondary access to the site? The logical location for the secondary access would be in alignment with the northernmost internal east/west roadway. 1 his is approximately 320 feet north from the proposed primary entrance off of N.E. 20th Street. The location of a roadway at this point would not interfere with any other planned roadways; however, topography may make the grades fairly difficult and result in substantial modifications or elimination of Building #3. From the developer's point of view, it would be more logical to make an intertie with existing development in the mobile home park. Utilizing traffic counts, approximately 1,100 vehicle trips could be associated with the development. The provision for a left-turn pocket at N.E. 20th Street would appear to meet the necessary traffic access needs of the project and a secondary access for general traffic circulation does not appeal critical. ISSUE: 7. The City of Renton questions the legal description and the ownership of the property shown in the site plan. The legal questions is whether the site plan approval can be granted prior to the applicant guaranteeing through appropriate title reports, and other necessary legal means, whether old streets have been formally vacated? In 1917, the Courts went through a series of actions to vacate portions of North 20th Street, then known as Lake Washington Boulevard. In the process it appears that the legal descriptions and the maps that were utilized were in conflict. To date, the applicant has not provided a title search to guarantee that the title companies will stand by the legal ownership of the property. Even on the site plan maps presented, there is a curious dog-leg, which runs through Buildings #2 and #3 of the proposed site plan. The issue could be a technical one but is probably more importantly resolved before the City issues building permits on the property. Prior to the decision of the Hearing Examiner on the site plan approval the following should be completed: Title Report Vacate portion of street along east side of Tax Lot 35. If the applicant does not own Tax Lot 35, then a quiet title should be done or put in motion. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINt LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C., INC.: SA-001-d MARCH 12, 1985 PAGE 5 It appears that the documentation is so scant from 1917 that there exists a real question whether the City of Renton owns a portion of the property or not. However, it should be pointed out that for many years the existing golf driving range buildings have been located on top of that right-of-way, if it exists. At any point, the legal issue should be resolved before the Hearing Examiner issues a formal decision on the site approval. 7.In conclusion, the site plan conforms with the specific environmental criteria and the general intent of development policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the subsequent rezone. Specific technical concerns should be addressed as part of the site plan approval process. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the Hearing Examiner approval the site approval request, file SA-007-85, by Lincoln Property Company subject to the following conditions: 1.Clarification of the legal ownership and/or the vacation of 104th Avenue S.E. 2.Provision for emergency access from the northern portion of the site to Lake Washington Boulevard per approval of the Fire Department. 3.Inclusion of an active recreational amenity on-site to include either a tennis court or a sports court, or comparable. 4. Final approval of all landscape plans dealing with the treatment of Lake Washington Boulevard and the sensitive steep slope area per the approval of the Landscape Architect. ftL11 11._I-L_J L11111!gill!:f?;P4 ,i T Ild. 'TTIILIIll , . f L1T111 I- f KINNYDAtE F1C COgST a YiHi I IIIIIII 111.1111.11 [ • EIFMFNTARI' P Q Q_— 19P".P °C i7 Illl 4 1;11111'1'1 Lt1 4$ SCN Ys l4ilJ 111 11, y l __Ll__T- ice__+ rA7i .-, r - i I - z ,T t o i» 1.L_.!.» tse _. t,zor V 1 %-\\-1 . I. I , F4 I -; .. • n : .,• I w 7 2TG i.._ 2.0 Z57' 222 21 vt + II i» iss r. a. • 4. •°• c `. I'• l.. as u t t 1 `• I 1 1 in 1 N z i 1 iw•• 7A7 ,• 7:4. I u 2as DALE ik 2 2) ~ Ei _ . •r A r I I M PARK 1I 1 'R 1 • s ; Si 11 ` \\o 7 265 213 262 253, v a, 140 0"- (Fl IJ •91'1 L 11 596 U z! 4 U n3 I 2 2V ,26j 'S7 U Z43 q34 Z.5 i, 4 x — I IT f lam' T20.. Nu lio.,..i 1 p. 292 2119r, a RI" E. rst. is 1 I i ` I - Q7a " nJ1• el Zia0 l•• ( I r91 z•C• u 4, •s , cl\,g\ • rt o 1 s0II- _ — 5 l— 7 I' i :*i a§-' r: 7s3, o 7s 731 729 i 7t 1 i / 1 1 rl4..r E. WASH Z.? Is . zaZ io , N1 1.111 r 6i 4 \\ 1tit 2. T I4+1 1 I 3r J LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS SA-007-85 APPL I CANT LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. TOTAL AREA - 9.7ACRES PR I NC I PAL ACCESS LAKE WASHINGTON BVLD. NORTH EXISTING ZONING R-3, RESIDENTIAL -MULTIPLE FAMILY EXISTING USE GOLF DRIVING RANGE PROPOSED USE MULTIPLE FAMILY COMPLEX CONSISTING OF 186 DWELLING UNITS COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN HIGH DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY, LOW DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY, AND GREENBELT COMMENTS ELEMENT k\. 1 i ))!, Single Family 3 Commercial 1• i... ,..:•• .•:::::::::::::::::. Low Density Ni::•• . . :.:::::::::::::::::.Multi-Family Office / Office P i met i .MMMMMMMMMMMMMM 4 111P illillik i Mee ''•::.:::::::::::.:.::::::* Den...teyrl•Medium 0111. 00000000000000. 411111?.I.Ing ON . Multi-Fa 000.°000.0.0.0. 000.00,-, Public/Quasi-Pt:I i :••4,:lor.iiiiiii1 0o.... Z:li:i-.. al,k,iki.,.433:::ui1, i :::..*/ •'\.• oh::: 6,4.-p... .•,.: g. gh Density -Light IndustrialAlkt1.T.1,3 :::;.:•.,:...: • . Multl-Family , I Ill... `?.. a 1. 111 0 i:a' i ', Recreation Heavy Industrial 0 Ft E.:4..,,,...; Greenbelt 7---•-:--=-7 Manufacturing P i. is...•,...,. i"MIN e:::e;„ 5,......--. ... pliW ';:.-':-...•c;„ --,,,,..:•-•:., L.-„:•:,::•-c,-.--- - 1983 c II essii.•A i N..:-.c..,'-'-14:...'7.1ip.:; :-':: 5?...a:..1: ''''''' VIM' 41;.baitti•:'..-,•1 .. ..c••-• -- ' L' 77;t•:,-',.-.••-• ..,..; .;'..r:c."..,,•,:.f...e.,c 71.--,....'". .) ;?c• :,4• •.c,,..,. ,.c.,,..^.:.'.'=;-.;,.....;-?..;...re',...2.:,j',..1;...c,,-,... L.,...:........,,. l'\ UM iili 1 A i v - c:,,;-,,,,s.... ,,--0.c.e......-,..5::::3:L•ip '6,.- N,::,...... ....,.. 41,,.o.o.0:0000:0000o00,300:0.. _ 4. 14,, 40001),M• Mttr / 11 c. 14- 1. f:,,.„..:........„ A.......,,.,..,,, .. 1 LAKE 4 i.,-,- , fir 4.-i, ,, A olk:i:;.::r..„ -- .,,. r- t. t(t) it 000 183.i......,:*: z,.,..,..,. r.-•-' t.70°.0°:,, ,-,-../..:: i'l• dik '''''J'' '',.:::'''. Ill I . .•..1.% 4?,,4_ N.( 1. 70 4"•:'. .k a z:•,..i., SH1NGTON i....., , • • - oil 01 I ?lin . :,:7:.::::.•:•:•-.7. A174,t1111111H;;;; Oi;:f2-,'4.,„ ....13:r :::. . MUMS • II UM 12.... IN: 00o-00.000o' A) .131,4 .: .00 ..'" ••• 41111111M ,..' S II•111_ All • ii 3•1 0000• r - .. r., 0. I00 Iliiitlq%. N i camat . ism k 00000 as I s 8 , -fa • • a:i:::iii:i:i:i::::Pfiff.V.::111- 4! Ill•,:0::iMi• 4`' ''\\' :::::.... I MilV y1.11111111.• i::::::..roost-;-•_ ::i:i::::::' 0 4„,.„As , a,. • ', RIM i 1.M:Frile. .., 1,-::::i,,:. . 1.1111111 t no*.- l • • • • • • • • • • •• • , •., C itig r____./. 4•••J .11111pr2-ii196,„,° g.• • • • • • • • • • • afissoo •••14 • 4PI.•:•:•:.:-:•:•: 4,......-.• ou'a0(30,30 • • • • • • • • • • • a : 1*] pg1/0 „. ..:.,:„. .. isui1, I.; c,gEeo:11 •••••••••••••••••• •• ••••• ''. . iiiii, 111 , 1". 1........i 8-1 ,:,gogo,t3og a il.., • • • • • • • • • • • *,_ : .i:i:i,i:i.?rumi, „. 00000 .. 0...0,..,i'.. 1111,•gg°0°g',3g,;14 4, , • • • • • • • • • -?, :. Irmi pro Illnah 000.Q.-0-0-6-0-.010 i..,g2,04,gg.,1, 1%. Unt3-114.1% • • • ... • , • •. • ,.. i 4 ,,,, .0%. W ..L415#gigi'ggggli .0°0.0.* 0:0:0.0 r,• o i 1 11111111111111. ,.. ,o0o. eallilL. Nil ,a,Szilf),i., i•••••••• • • • t••'1,,, 4, 1 . lipir. Vie WQ. .1 0 . 4 • • • Yg9igqg:ii .0.0.0.1r - @ ••••••••• „c.,3. ‘ tt ot •..... :1...di a ..........::::...::.. .goS204510000g se i • • • 1 AINI I • 1111111115.-,*11•:::::`(>' 6.0.8bo°2%;"14 ' • • 4 • • • • • ';-.• 1,E, Q 0 000 o .,r 777•7•7:-.7-7i;11••••••• 0. •• i,/,' 416801=8$ 485MR'',• 11\!Oggo:ggkat.•••••• l!il •.:':'•-::::..:11'.1 • • • • ii A 0:.0.0"'r77777•77•7774 i ---li it En•?0g0g0g0g0:W... • 0 .iii.. i..,:;:.. .t.:,:fli 3 flPie CO/ ilf ,10, i , LI ..7-gogggegogo it....•..1))•..=•-...-.......-. 4..,„ 0°'0°0. :•:.:•:.:•:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:•:.:.:.....n .................... ilk• • 0 1 111111% fl 162202.,_ csasseilii id iiiiiiii11.A. ..? ll_l!111,IfIti,----;1- a.° P i ftrort414,1, ,......„...., : 0..--, - 111.//, .s. .'-' •' •. ., :0:'.... ...:.,CM. •:0°00:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:.000000000000000000.• .:::i,:,ii :.... ,, 1 g,,E*'0.g.* 4 cc): F7y4011111111,11111146„,-,7i8L ley •'•:'.:•'-`• .: .i :•••:aiig'''':'::::.::.•:.::]: 0°0.°0•°°0°0 '. 0':::::°00:05Fgo°00: ! . a- .. 000gco•ggggggrAA*g.07 Willi Cc"..gig:3';'..9‘ 027,,;°'gc,'Clgk,'go. ' ':gg•Illfillp ypie.4. g4012;::.. '':',' '• '; ••:•:::::::::::K:i::.*:: •000000000•000000000000• y.'.•.'.•• .,e..."7.- . .:. ., I1!•64°tPg°g°gg(S?„ig.,%,15;-°4: 444 Ili „,r,___, 7 401, ..;.„..,,.L:0041:mmii .0.0.00.0.•...0.009§6w. ..:,.T.:00.80%°00.000.00000. ,..:...1:..7.ti miint;14/44104/iiiiiiroi7:7........ipli,.,Widmorafro.0.0..0... ::•,:•: i.i•iiiigliiiiiiii 1 0000000: 00040000. 00000000000:0000000000:0000000000000000: i.::tvoirl 0,300.......0.0,),c,• ,....:::..],...:•.•.•.• Alegh,,I:mak_j....",;,:;:;:,• ii 111:0 AFC liy.2,i M., o0.70. 000o:o.:•• ,: •...:::.::..:.:i:.::.: .......... 7,...1..90o0ocpc,o0o0o0o0o 4 ., .............. 1. 7941°4Til•Halr'04;,aggpOga ..41:V.)1.14;j1:7%.•41'/ ;,:: a* ,'., 0 0 0 o 0 .:.:.:•:.:.:•:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: 000000000.000000. -.,,IL:.:.:.:.• 1111:::::eg!ggggggggg`g 1 01:11:11::::".. ..,,,,•; 4'14.11/1,1 000000.0 .t., •...-...•.... 0000.0• rtr, :.:........:.:.:.. VgIVII:211." .•.•°.° °•°•°.44•43:111:11:11:ii 0::74; i•.1,„ZiPlit7rP\ 'Cfi II i.!,..:..: , ,:i.:,,,,,::::::: ,,,..,,.. -•0 0• , A* a.. 111011111•111M1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ..V, •••.n.: .:::::::::::::::::•:.• s I.,„,?..„ 0;,•.;,..-:.,....,(:,..-„.s;E.,..,....et, ...:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:..., JOS. Ill •1111•1111111 811M111111111111•ive • •, 0 4.1,,, v., ,', ••••• ./.,el,.p-9/.,,,,,-,•2,,.,,.... .....•...:,:.:.:•:.: ,,iiik 17.T ••"''''..••••• 13111,11••••.•••••••••••••• - • "ft,.. •••••..k. . , ,„„.- J WI 5(;/.. ••.0). . A '1'1.V 9.ri/ '?''16..fil.'*';'.0'.1,4' ..:::::.:.:.:':.:.:.. r- Ilaralaaalallall!! a!''4....1s, Itekl• . alt._ 1.-.71a.3.z"?'••9' ,"- ..:.?,• '.'..-P.6 1)..! r›,..%,,,,,,,,,9• 0'ff.r,n..,L .:.:.:.:•:.:.:::::.ii1911,00 'AP Isms wicotmeni semi...r..... p.,, r•-h. ,._,.t.. .-t- .8,N.... ,-,„6 ;r3)..;,;,,R•t..1)..,,••ze?0!,et).',,,,r1.9 p,,y •...i,:,, -..:.:.:.:..... 474111 MMMMM!IV' 11111116•111/1.”,•Ipllif 1.,,,,,,,•,, ,•.7.1 fr.,.. 7.• ge„ .1.3(2,.. ..,,....r>•eie,.6;,,,,,,-.-,,, • ,••r;;.;:,....,6 .......S4:,,-r,•,, '•••••: Mdf s!!!!!!!'itiA!!!!!!' 11';'',. 11.*:46 11:F4.°7 .'"31:73‘ 31- .n. ‘I' il,'.1; '.r." 4": Mg,, ..7 • '; MMMMMMMMMM minim 14 tgi:,'.7-,;i 41:::a s. . ...,(,,,,L,,,,_ C.. • . •...:'-;,. -,, ,..,' n•'(,•,;., 0,-. "'S'• ., :• .. ., •',....:-/- 'aglik%44111.11171111 ..•,ii• C ie;"•.!.- .2,.,i:(.,•:-.,:.!-;:; 3.itit 0: ..A.:,.:;4 i' lb a; 14, 49:1!1.-.., 4K.1.24%,41\rill.,. ,c' {-:;_s.:?)r_cy: ,- -.', ',-/,' uh, m.:,:.:,,s.::::,.., 4 inn•,44.,,,:,,....,,a,,•p pp,. k la4.‘5;;.(10'''..;:',. a: r'''..Z),.•411.74/44,.... 4.`,..10.illt.44‘si is.....•-.. t ye. i'vr.(1:. .ic re„. ....:., ,MIMI Ille 'A ',;••••:,:•-:... .:: It T -1..:'' • :.':..i 0 •• li.'.",• '::,s(i',..\.:,v: N . -- 2212---i7T,,...••, * 4,.. Wal... 1"‘•-„,,,ct„..c...rt' 0,,,cr. -0,,,,14 ' . MM, '.• •••••'. -' ...tx• eto4 .v.t,1',..Q.).1 •.,;•*-o '1 01;.V..V2.42 4a *,..•- 6 :• 0(1( ,CY' '•. . 2,..,,,.::ii t: :6• 4 :;(0. i.,::..:!?:,.:: : ,..:;...... s.....----; I:: 4,''• •,;.; : c?",,.. c.4,--. i",.....7e::,•fire7,-. 0 as - -• •••,••',...lami N Ifilt. 0'Loi,fliv‹;(1.;%4 0.•40t.s.,..0.00.%,(,,,-,,„•.... -, r_, F. : ; _ .0...,... :,-. ,,..),7 i ---0;,,....*.tL's N .',7.,,, oar aiiisi 0,;. I I I•:,000000.00.000.IF•go: 7r/ ,z.., , .All•;i'v.00'-','.,.1,, !.t!.i. '... TS e.• - ,. N.•-, , -7.,CY,. ti.,‘C.C1 riki,r.r':`.1 ex..•• mimeo. MMMMMcl.... t Ill 1 P...-.•;:,'..i. 4',.••0,0 t%•i":...iv%i+•,‘:., 4ii..., , •. - ",. 07 lek, - •• • "-..... .-• i., -61.;f:•:::: •/.4:1;•;`,,.. .:°-.:•,,..(;c: cs;••,''i.,•%6%;;IV:,'13`,,?,!;•$:',,`'co•?.."Si',V,•%*ift,I) ENSP.7...01. 1 At'' O.(.1. •.A..• O. . .••• , 0 . ...L)44 i. ..) l• 00.to'co..^...i.:k. ,,".-0•-1.,. ' •).F.:'(01:P•tir,.'1'O.' .)..C1'Q. • ' Oi 4c.. Ic.. ' .".'' .' .'.'":''11." . '''•'1). VI,tl•"r q,,,,...% LV....,.ti •'....'''''''' ,‘•1., '2,.. i.,,:..,•:V,../:'•..,,-... IJ . fi.4,1 ii„61%,,•a 1,, ,,,„.{,.,(N.:1: c!01,e.,1,. 4... 2 t t. leallib: „.... e a:Niii:::.. ( 4 '' '''VA?:.1,1‘.:... ." a .' 1 • i V.::::::::::;:::::,::::t:::.:i*:, 1 MMMMM:0.'7 ..4] i:::;ir. =.1 - . c,...'• i. c..,. , ';'w,--..-4.114; P:4-1.‘-...%.• 147111°,* . 41. 441 leW /(\. „...:.::::?:: a:: 1..;;P!:.''Ait .1k\, I t 1 I 1 St, a..o .none: MOM.1MO KUA! wri,cdK ELO« s srq mF.a vaESENLL I11CIL3•O MUM• TO WTCM.uctwltwr .. 1 SEE s.aR. _ 1 wonoe I ar, v aE7 r+ Cisa: ` r 09 wtc.uaM.c IM TyrSEna LT lin 0,1T rwww YV.r of r..a- -- rloEs en V v,T 01 MK N ' 1 T Miltrx1LIT' r C1.TEE ow a.n 22.R+9. 1. 1 N MA1.Y.Y L!.glfel: T a V 0 lCalt u tov M O=OV,T 0,PM MW1Y1 It do iiiii°Rat.Y,YR. i j NMI= O,l Oirw 601 kg. ...... - .410V ,,•• PAVED PARKING 4 Rl•:iiq i1ri11Ew1n i ' 4211/71 Rw,.%- LTA 7201110 CONC. CiRl lu WtCONC.COYO r11arQ•Y V,r 0.l r1\ IrGlb j ff `TE+OMY rN. • / tt.c..R.SC.M12 84414 z. k 1 1L m w.c. P w 44tr, 1I111 41114111 YY liY E1 8i t A i. 1•= yE— a,Ta.. illIllillIllwt,q,: rT"'q: IIIIV I M11..Mru NuwnV I T1...1 Ir tq.Y.lYVal.r Wr.. 1.,.Ewa IM,:.;, IN RA i 31aY a, • ..MIMI1RwCa[,riper RKl MIIO/MOM w LE 10La:Pill Ci- Mn wnM T PO sluC lA-tiYYR• P MAIM SO SF OA Mt R 7*A* a I YOaYO n IiE1_!,r.o•.01: rwr.a II Lr Or 1r01 rw 5•1 7/ Fi1.0 E`sn wrtx r.., t rwowlw V a,ralrw p Vl R..•Y.Y Li mama Y1 V O.r.A PM tr Cl P.M r..IRM1.Df TOi.... wawa Y,Yir Ma MO J MCi 412r rIM MSC EE00011 3 E—___ 1 fi:Meiro—titmVI -ir I.MIRE 1. R,Mili naw err w1 wr.a.a.tnwrwY.orlM ' rweE r In PM r 1. cA wale 1.M t WI l..a..w arlw s.wr!•R.1.Y a•m t•Y a MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS aw.cE..o t.culor aarrl.----_______ 16'WATER TRANSMISSION PIPELINE r•YTa M AND PRESSURE RELEASE VALVE _ Wv 0^ STA.J•N W.TO MAMMA UMW..r.I TM., f{—p7—_=)• rn..rv.ae e. YwMs.t E• .w. IX,usaat OrIP'l1 I^ watt NA e CM;3411141370L ATE .T mar ri 1 ry I I---IVfYrlr I I J i f......,, I C J iii . ss u...fr.q J ~ n or t t .. II I II a in.....:-.......'I rYYO.MiI p/NM'I I I 1 `, I I I I Q1.i wM fil r--- 1—. Ir-r R.f R. IV MLR fllOPIOT 1 IMF. a,wu.J u.,.f Jr wallftlem a.a..f•.aurrR 1.111.171,urs..r M.P.!Mau.f o...,PS w n. n' ri a.nw ,c..o. n°"..'n'.'r e"i•aw ii-- l...,....o.u..Y., i i s v n LP IC OF PPP Y we.o...o.a.a IS.u'..un n.as sv rcu,w u `t \.... tar. .a.tam... i . - RwV..f.Rw.... 0 , .w 1 PwrY.R..r.ufrr I f.a:anus a rtM.rrs. iiY- pia 1 M01w.s wl n..a..Rw n.s• l II Ye aeweY.eauoF 14 Pleme erf IL_r-- I( e UfYf,Turn.. T'a. '14-e wo nx i F / i // e:• .`O(NJ•mMP. T VAULT wm. . IF K J I TO carom .a.r. 1 wrNt N iNaraKra 1014 rs*i PP I 1 \ ( ( Li ltart.,.Ye tal.O.f.M y` aY.ll t Mf 11Y1- / I I a-fP.O:OKf. cl , i.ay....fei rw l._ 1 r---- - x i i iO 1r.Tc.uut STA...Y..ME s..tET r MARINA LANDING APARTMENTSEIS' WWATERTRANSMISSIONPELINE ANDgPRESSUREREDUCINGVALVE N I iaar MAIN PLAN ATA T.a t To AA 7.am r...- . ,. -- 1 Y.YY APINAPPIO IOW 1 .. r. 1 Mat i 1MARINALANDINGAPARTMENTSL_ PROPOSED WATER IMPROVEMENTS 4.---- 11••• •S F---: --,,-- A,,,,,- . ws• 7,., 4•-• 1— 7 • ItLAKEWAINNOTON le•."--:-.....„ -- EC 4Olit...... 01. ta. t• P' I go 1co• „ow c, ...„,,.... _ i 1:..---- 1i I I/ 7. I 1E t I• 1 i I1 .. . i i ;1IPROPOSED12"WATERMAN --____. I N. \ I 1 LI A i II. CAPOW AVF• I WrI01117111i atom . r. "'SING'4"1"t"Mbil:-'r...m\--tHr-- iIPROPOSECIItWATERWEI7 IIIIIIMINNIM......,... M mmggmmgrmit-L---,aa=nwrr..xrvmwmia. CO=INEEMINI1111.11...111.1111111= A 1 100. 77 ROOFING TILE 1' r ALUM. SLIDING WINDOWS AND DOORS r]r- 11 CEDAR 6101M0 n'B A A BI p s1l= 1 1 I 1 y. END ELEVATION BUILDING TYPE 2 n___E-1___L 01' 6' 10' 20' WA, 3 a= :. -- _ --.. I 1=, 1 _I I I_ rl, -IlUr= I--I— E.• = M '.-- - mina 1— 7 = tea.=!-1_ 41 ro= 11A47 m 15_L Ell ow-if itiii^41 = c I'-' l;J s%'.111_= mom im-allemilW,: z.,,, i i 1 c 1-- --- —2:... ..- DON* IBM TYPICAL REAR ELEVATION TYPICAL FRONT ELEVATION IVMILBRANDT ARCHITECTS 1 1 w0 ROOFING TILE 41n-ALUM. SLIDING WINDOWS AND DOGNS/ s/! ..-- 7 s< 9a 1111 y CEDAR SIDING 41a„ C A A ^ 1I C iF! li. ME1 aira\ sr,____ F END ELEVATION I l BUILDING TYPE 11 I i ET a sgr=1_s/ce 1 s _ t a'— F. mligig...r a 1--- —.1111: 2721-1,2•IV._ :,-,=-= Emiiir IN F J 1 f r-'— spy. -' t f;Y. _ s1s=a 711111 1= il ,i_11 d Ml 1 1 1= r 1y'ti. TYPICAL REAR ELEVATION TYPICAL FRONT ELEVATION 1 MILSRANDT ARCHITECTS A i I-- N 1 1'0 MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS VICINITY MAPI i ". A LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY DEVELOPMENT UWE T,311EMTON J 1_ ,, PROJECT SITE E.20TN ST. IICaa , 3E3011333 '/ 130 3ppN0ln13 Tt EXTENT OF CLE331110 1° ~ IV i WINTON ItO 4. V Will PLANT X I 140 : GG II\B a ) 11,,,40 V li..;% 11OtEe11 1 . iibi O 1 _ I 4 / \\ y^/ ellitillfl r • V \ j V '/ 1 r EXISTS.°.00E3T'1 ONE tritc,,,,a i. .„0 ,,, ....,.,,,, \1, 4,„....4,,,, t. i A,,,,,... 01.40:......../... 40‘,"....... ram,•!•./ r b10J \ \it ‘ A , 40%.,11N* ' s.' ''C itt*--.-- ' 4""s eT.cs. wears WWII UMT1. y i.''"'' t j1`. p•Worrs Lea T.1.---' 104.311Ea.L u4COLN nran€/vy ow / hd STORM Q SPR2PO4/V/TARy,SEµEq 0000111 MIOWE.. ,33sTsoLLEN,....1' env e.t 0/0/ °0„ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/D+ . SION ; 4-A.J O APPROVED 1:1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS D NOT APPROVED 1-_-----ac..}'? C Z DATE : Z ?-Y6 SIGNATJ0E OF DIRECTOR 'lR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : File- OAPPROVED a APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 7.C.Coec/ t 'ie,, Alcc'Sf /e AoS X C' r.e. vQ'.ec v /1,1/ //i't /•%,-/ I, e.. . A74:---v:/7 . /---7/z/on.0... I-67 1,'/,-,/,',-,/, e;,,,,,,,,,,,--,4c,,,c4,,,..). 7 / -Pie,eenc-ec/ A20_,2/'/;I/" f•V it it,14a i DATE: /-`' SIGNATURE F IR CTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1082 l 1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : I APPROVED fl APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED i J - 1 s /hLte tiff J 40 (D /100<e v/A5 €a cor. . • 1 roam- v c i n•s thetucdeD f r Aa ( D. o. N..S. 1.55c0 6r- A)-073-FS/a ,-, 5.' fti.e 116,40h0NA 4 . s:,, . DATE: l,o D/I•S- BY 5:00 P.M. ON TUESDAY_ --I' Y 29, 1:7t ._.._._.._ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION; APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED S-•C CBrr .t ems-- L Grp• 1K sltir a.) v e- 0 /6-c. 5;74. ,'k".e YD' ^ram.l r L r1 y /4v- 5 r e ra C- f) 2" ---7`%.'/eel S 4c d r e.,•)^% .1.t 4714-.> REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; 0774/Ty •7/1.4C//1XE.E,Plitl o El APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS E NOT APPROVED IJ O s A(Pncocio 4 r/uTy Pumrs itt11T AP I/VAI SYs,tCI TO LATE MINERS UIIIII/T • WATER NO LATE CRIERS AOIEEMIEIIT • SEME1 y/x5,, C F--OZ/o - /MZ .90- M. 44d, SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT Ci!b'ft lTEB i - P3E,S /Zl u,4r fs $/'7,5 -• - STSTEM DEr.?G,ti.;'f S4EA__ ye-5 ,/Flp phi/s , -*/7,7. 4 32, SSD SPECIAL ASSESSMEM &F. t :s::1`f.•C • NO 7474,/- SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA Cl4s1U • Sr';‘ APPROVED WATER PLAN 4-5 CilEc.-05 A w F'c, k" -n1 - Y9.ei, EDAPRIIEDSEMIPLANE4g•L V4r/ous c4-osE Arr,E /7701V AMMO FIRE EMT AUTOS S.4/00 2) ' " c A/ IT FIRE Kn. YEs P,e sve.E zoVSs TU Praz'E.ery. FIRE Fill AMAITSIS Aor DATE: 2.7 SIGNATU OF DIRECT" UTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1082 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ;TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION El APPROVED Ei APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED See attEchment. tar DM' DATE: SI . ut1E Drc 'CIOR OR r D REPRESENTATIVE Marina Landing Apartm( 1 . Off-site improvements - Lake Washington Blvd. North Provide at entrance: a) left turn storage lane into development b) left turn acceleration lane out of development Roadway widening may be necessary to accommodate added traffic lane. 2. Provide curb, gutter and sidewalk to above off-site improvements on Lake Washington Blvd. North. 3. 1 Negotiate with Puget Sound Power & Light Company, Telephone Company and TV Cable Company to underground that portion of the main overhead electrical and communication distribution system fronting property on Lake Washington Blvd. North which is below 55 KV. 4. Include street lighting as an off-site improvement for NE 20th Street and for Lake Washington Blvd. 5. Due to the accummulative effect of anticipated growth of the subject area it is recommended that the following assessment be attached to the proposed development to help improve traffic conditions for that area. Traffic Volumes Increase G Burnett Ave. N at Lake Wash. Blvd. (with development) 2,275 without development) 2, 160 115 or 5.32% Lake Wash. Blvd. at Lakeside site (with development) 6,680 without development) 6,340 340 5.32% Lake Wash. Blvd. north of Garden Ave. North with development) 8,595 without development) 7,800 795 10. 19% Type of Improvement Assessment Value a. Lake Wash. Blvd. 6 Lakeside entrance PART OF DEVELOP- provide 100% funding for cost of installing MENT PLAN centerlane left turn to site Type of Improvement Assessment Value b. Provide off-site improvement on Lake Wash. Blvd. PART OF DEVELOP- curb, gutters and street lighting abutting property MENT PLAN c. Burnett Ave. North & Lake Wash. Blvd. North southbound merge lane on Lake Wash. Blvd. from Burnett Ave. North 300 LF @ lO/LP 3,000 @ 5.32% 160.00 d. Lake Wash. Blvd. between Park Dr. 6 Houser Way widen 800 linear feet of Lake Wash. Blvd. approx. 9 to 10 feet 652. 16 800 LF @ $8.00/LF 6,400 @ 10. 19% e. Lake Wash. Blvd. & Garden Ave. North/Park Dr. N upgrade traffic signal controller for roadway widening 1 ,528.50 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISIC - _ DAPPROVED IE APPROVED WITH CONDIIIONS EINOT APPROVED PL/C A-A)T S/5'O U L/, A eY/e P/9-c, O N ' //3 L / S eety/ce S ,s0 'T//,-T /9 Pr'L/CnJ/ uJ//ZL 0 Fu T "f R L L eriv21 Sl.DATE: / SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHr' 1 REP ESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED 216..ROVED WITH CONDITIONS EINOT APPROVED 1) Concerns about traffic flow onto Lake Washington Boulevard. Must pro- vide channelization for 3rd lane turn in and out. 2) Solid core doors on all entrances with double locks. Dead bolts on all sliding glass doors to patios. 3) Each building adequately marked building with at least 12" letters or numbers, contrasting color to background. 4) Non-glare lighting on outsides of buildings and parking areas. 5) Adequate cleaning pads from site to eliminate the tracking of mud, etc. onto the public roadways. DATE: SIGNAT 'E OF D CTOR or AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 1,1 0598N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-007-.85 A+ICATION NO(s).: SA- 007-85 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a multi-family complex totaling 186 units, having 17 buildings and a building for management and recreation. PROPONENT: Lincoln Property Company N.C., Inc. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North at the 2000 block. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed .nvironmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-.2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to King County Superior Court no later than February 25, 1985. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DA 'B OF DECISION: February 6, 1985 PUBLICATION DATE: February 11, 1985 Ronald G. Nelson a ry M. inger Building and Zoning Director Policy De lopment irector LeC L , • Lil a Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director 1357Z NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHING-ON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENT ON, WASHINGTON ON MARCH 12, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS Application for site plan approval to remodel the interior of an existing warehouse building with 13,331 square feet of new office space, and to add 110 new parking stalls on the subject site, file SA-014-85; located at 333 S.W. 41st Street. DKB CORPORATION Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of an office/warehouse building having approximately 110,000 square feet on a 6.2 acre site (North Valley Business Park), file SA-011-85; located on the east side of West Valley Road at approximately the 3900 block. LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C._LINC. Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a multi-family complex totaling 186 units, having 17 buildings and a building for management and recreation, file SA-007-85; located on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North at the 2000 block. Legal descrbtions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTER'_STED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLI2 HEARING ON MARCH 12, 1985, Al 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : MARCH 1, 1985 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JEANETTE SAMEK-McKAGUE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Publ:c, ,in and for the State of Washington residing in r' ,Ltc on the 1st day of arch, 1985. i Q OF R,c. rD City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a PUBLIC HEARING in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON f RUI 1?, 1985 _--_--_---___ _-- _ BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: SA-007-85 fl REZONE From__ To SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT To__ rid SITE APPROVAL I SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVISION of Lots PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE FROM GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCATED ON THE_ EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION SIGNIFICANT fNONSIGNIFICANT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL. THE CITY O.= RENTON C3UILDING &ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION OF R' L 4 to MPLm> ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 0 MEM Li 9 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 O91 t . 0 SE?S E O Q BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR March 4, 1985 Scott Sp-'inger Lincoln Properties Company N.C., Inc. 11400 S.E. 6th Street, Suite 220 Bellevue, WA 98004 Re: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a multi-family c)mplex totaling 186 units, having 17 buildings and a building for management and recreation, file SA-007-85; located on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North at the 2000 block. Dear Mr. Springer: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on January 16, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Ue Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for March 12, 1985. The public hearing commerces at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any quer,tions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JIVM:c1 1372Z OF R4'ti BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 2, rw MEM L ' rn MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 O 235-2540 90 co- 0 9gTfD SEPI°'° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR March 4, 1985 Anna Ph nney 1000 Aberdeen Avenue N.E. Renton, dVA 98055 Re: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a multi-family complex totaling 186 units, having 17 buildings and a building for management and recreation, file SA-007-85; located on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North at the 2000 block. Dear Ms. Phinney: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mention3d application on January 16, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land U:e Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for March 12, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, tet2.1e. • SLAVtrck Roger J. Blay ock Zoning ,Administrator RJB:JMM:c1 1372Z-:' OF /24, r` `'' BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENTcorz Z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 90 co• OggT o SE 3SE° P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR March 4, 1985 Marjorie Lotto 201 Unioi Avenue S.E., #185 Renton, `NA 98056 Re: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a multi-family complex totaling 186 units, having 17 buildings and a building for management and recreation, file SA-007-85; located on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard N 3rth at the 2000 block. Dear Ms Lotto: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on January 16, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for March 12, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The app icant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerel,', Roger .9 Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JM\1:cl 1372Z-_ RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPA VIENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 007 - 85 APPLICATION NJ(S) : SA-007-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT : LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. PROJECT TITLE : MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIFTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 186 UNITS IN A MULTI-FAMILY COMPLEX OF SEVENTEEN BUILDINGS AND A BUILDING FOR MANAGEMEN- AND RECREATION. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK. TO : 0 PUBLIC I;ORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/30185 EN(IINEERING DIVISION ITRaFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU E PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M ON TUESDAY. JANUARY 29, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Ei APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El: NOT APPROVED y P P Z-/C 4'/AJ f J ,[ 1 J U L/J /mil//6-u)v G1v/1ir,L- o FUTU/C-" freJjjJel; J Z -c DATE : / // f /ar _ SIGNATURE OF DIRIEC TOR OR AUTHr REPRESENTATIVE RENTI BUILDING & ZONING DEPA 1AENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 007 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-007-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT : LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. PROJECT TITLE : MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 186 UNITS IN A MULTI-FAMILY COMPLEX OF SEVENTEEN BUILDINGS AND A BUILDING FOR MANAGEMENT AND RECREATION. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK. TO : E] PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/30/85 EN3INEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PR=VENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR NUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON TUFSDAY. JANUARY 29, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ;TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION OAPPROVEI LI APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I INOT APPROVED See attachment. e4.1'4* DATE : af-Ar-'5 SI 1uXh OF 15rc" LiOR ^R ' r1T7 =D REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Marina Landing Apartm 1 . Off-site improvements - Lake Washington Blvd. North Provide at entrance: a) left turn storage lane into development b) left turn acceleration lane out of development Roadway widening may be necessary to accommodate added traffic lane. 2. Provide curb, gutter and sidewalk to above off-site improvements on Lake Washington Blvd. North. 3. Negotiate with Puget Sound Power & Light Company, Telephone Company and TV Cable Company to underground that portion of the main overhead electrical and communication distribution system fronting property on Lake Washington Blvd. North which is below 55 KV. 4. Include street lighting as an off-site improvement for NE 20th Street and for Lake Washington Blvd. 5. Due to the accummulative effect of anticipated growth of the subject area it is recommended that the following assessment be attached to the proposed development to help improve traffic conditions for that area. Traffic Volumes Increase Burnett Ave. N at Lake Wash. Blvd. (with development) 2,275 without development) 2, 160 115 or 5.32% Lake Wash. Blvd. at Lakeside site (with development) 6,680 without development) 6,340 340 5.32% Lake Wash. Blvd. north of Garden Ave. North with development) 8,595 without development) 7,800 795 10. 19% Type of Improvement Assessment Value a. Lake Wash. Blvd. & Lakeside entrance PART OF DEVELOP- provide 100% funding for cost of installing MENT PLAN centerlane left turn to site J Type of Improvement Assessment Value b. Provide off-site improvement on Lake Wash. Blvd. PART OF DEVELOP- curb, gutters and street lighting abutting property MENT PLAN c. Burnett Ave. North & Lake Wash. Blvd. North southbound merge lane on Lake Wash. Blvd. from Burnett Ave. North 300 LF @ 10/LF 3,000 @ 5.32% 160.00 d. Lake Wash. Blvd. between Park Dr. & Houser Way widen 800 linear feet of Lake Wash. Blvd. approx. 9 to 10 feet 800 LF @ $8.00/LF 6,400 @ 10. 19% 652. 16 e. Lake Wash. Blvd. & Garden Ave. North/Park Dr. N upgrade traffic signal controller for roadway widening 15,000 @ 10. 19%1 ,528.50 TOTAL ASSESSMENT AMOUNT 2,340.66 RENT( BUILDING & ZONING DEPA VENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 007 - 85 APPLICATION 1' O(S) : SA-007-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT : LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. PROJECT TITLE : MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIFTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION 1)F 186 UNITS IN A MULTI-FAMILY COMPLEX OF SEVENTEEN BUILDINGS AND A BUILDING FOR MANAGEMEN- AND RECREATION. LOCATION : LOCATED ON TH : EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK. TO : Ej PUBLIC PORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : J/30/85 El ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : Q UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS :_, COMMENTS OR SJGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M . ON TUESDAY. JANUARY 29, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 774/Ty E-il4c//1XE,E, 74k. El APPROVED ill APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 1 NOT APPROVED IJ66OS A0041:06-6 ytiUTy Ptuv ITILITT APPRIVAL SVIJECT 1n LATE COMETS AGREEMENT • WATER NO ATE COWERS AGREEMENT • SEWER y 0/ES AG-OZ( //Z O 9— ` r• 44• SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CIIVEfi_zoTEP y.E5 t.1 crO Li.-.r(fs 0 4/7.5-: °0.a _ 013Z, SS 4• D0 SYSTEM DEYttG:F:i ; cPt!,,: 5zwEs k"s_.ib (Jhi s $/7S a0. .,P 1 32, 55. _ SPECIAL ASSESSMENT f< -t .:. ,. •5q r.:k NO 74/al- ,Dv " SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA C6;U • SI!?:+ 1APPROVEDWATERPLANS' uEi;nS A Fut p,p`r v4// Oy : S,E OF VAi.,o IPPIIVED SEWER PLAN y E,E 4TIo&vs C,LOS,E 477 eVT/O1/ DIJ D r3,E c/(/EA/ TUAPPROVEDFILENTIRANTIOtATN1ASS 11 FIRE UPI. s P,e. s-a,e,E' zoic/SS Tb S.E.eVE- fltE Fall ANALYSIS j P yesAIM bx , IV j DATE : 2,— 7 ` gir SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO 1UTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE IV ' RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPII MENT DIEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 007 - 85 APPLICATION VO(S) : SA-007-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT : LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. PROJECT TITLE : MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRI 3TION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 186 UNITS IN A MULTI-FAMILY COMPLEX OF SEVENTEEN BUILDINGS AND A BUILDING FOR MANAGEMENT AND RECREATION. LOCATION : LOCATED ON TFE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK. TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/30/85 DENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILIT1ES ENG . DIVISION El] FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT EIBUILDIN( & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT EPOLICY IEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 29, 1985 4312)REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : G EIAPPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Ell NOT APPROVED 7(.}'77 c 2-9-- DATE : 2Z--) 9 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOP 1R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RFVIRInN 5/1282 I RENT"" BUILDING & ZONING DER) '""MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 007 - 85 APPLICATION IN O(S) : SA-007-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT : LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. PROJECT TITLE : MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIFTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 186 UNITS IN A MULTI-FAMILY COMPLEX OF SEVENTEE BUILDINGS AND A BUILDING FOR MANAGEMEN~ AND RECREATION. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THI: EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK. TO : 0 PUBLIC MORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/30/85 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 10FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Ei] PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Ei OTHERS :_ COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M , ON TUESDAY. JANUARY 29. 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ElAPPROVED E(PPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED PD/AaS oeo vas , ,04,1 , J,4/J 46/11 C2 /7 P7 '01/Z "4, c4e/7t &ot,ocr' efett4A,t). c-‘7. a)/4-7 .e. /.144/,'d /42-41.0 VYGle-Mial p/. .e7leivz,1 AL? a°44'keZo00,ee) / eeb, :0/ fir U 4/14e„11 t,;s DATE : /;2"-l.C- SIGNATU,K IR CTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 RENT( WILDING & ZONING DEPA TENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 007 - 85 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION £JO(S) ; SA-007-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL)IAN 18 1985 PROPONENT : LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. pgtiElnOACKIT nFPT PROJECT TITLE : MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION )F 186 UNITS IN A MULTI-FAMILY COMPLEX OF SEVENTEN BUILDINGS AND A BUILDING FOR MANAGEMENT AND RECREATION. LOCATION ; LOCATED ON TH= EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK. TO : PUBLIC NORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/30/85 ENCINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION D FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Q BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT ELPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS ;_ COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5; 00 P .M. ON TUESDAY. JANUARY 29, 1985 REVIEWING DEPRTMENT/DIVISION ; APPROVED F-1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED A-1(10e G"ioprovr-( s of je ci 710 com / re Ai A- .e Ihclucl rr l42 PetoLI D O. I .S. 1-550,4o(cr N... 073_816 ,7 J C DATE : 04/8-- SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO UIHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE a i4non RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPA RENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 007 -• 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-007-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT : LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. PROJECT TITLE : MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 186 UNITS IN A MULTI-FAMILY COMPLEX OF SEVENTEEN BUILDINGS AND A BUILDING FOR MANAGEM EJT AND RECREATION. LOCATION ; LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/30/85 Ej ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : Ei UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ri POLICE IEPARTMENT Ei POLICY IEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS ;_ COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M , ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 29, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; APPROVED Ej APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED 1/a//8 - DATE SIC t OF DIRECTOR Or ED REPRESENTATIVE RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEN MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 007 •- 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-007-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT : LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. PROJECT TITLE : MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCR: PTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 186 UNITS IN A MULTI-FAMILY COMPLEX OF SEVENTEEN BUILDINGS AND A BUILDING FOR MANAGEMENT AND RECREATION. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/30/85 El ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M . ON TUESDAY. JANUARY 29. 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :GA e- El APPROVED11.--6-F;ROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED 16, Ali DATE ; ( - SIGNAT ,RE OF D SECTOR 0 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RctII IAM R/10R, CITY OF RE,NTON FEB 1 1 1985 LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. February 8, 1985 Mr. Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: MARINA LANDING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Dear Roger: Per our telephone discussion, please be advised that we will agree to install a sport court facility on our Marina Landing project. It is my understanding that this recreational upgrade, together with the other matters set forth in my previous letter dated February 5, 1985, will enable the Environmental Review Committee to issue its Memorandum of Concurrence for our project. Yours truly, Scott B. Springer Vice President SBS:jp 11400 S.E. 6th Street Suite 220 Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 455-4813 DODDS ENGINEERS,INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING February 5, 1985 DEI Project No. 81010 Engineering Dept. Attn: Don Monaghan City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue So. Renton, WA 98055 Re: Marina Landing - Lincoln Property Co. Dear Mr. Monaghan; Attached is a print of the record-of-survey prepared by Ken Oyler and a copy of the County Commissioners Journal relating to the vacation of a portion of Lake View Boule- vard. Despite our efforts to locate additional information, this is the only document which the County has located relative to the road vacation. Lots 342 and 359 (referred to as "Blocks" in the record) were vacated as well as that portion of Lake View Boule- vard lying southerly of the east-west centerline of Section 5-23-5. Hopefully these documents will satisfy any of your concerns. If you have questions or if we can be of further assistance, please contact us. Very truly yours, DODDS ENGINEERS, INg. i l Douglas J. Dodds,- P.L S. , encl. 0 cc: Scott Springer John Phillips a 'Z 9 ,r DJD/jbw F9 8 AY 4205 148TH AVE. N.E., SUITE 200-BELLEVUE, WA 98007 [206) B85-7877 OR 454-3743 N—.r, contractors; in arriving at the amount of the lump sum: On account ofdoingthisamountofextraworkforwhichwereceivednothingwethinkshouldfairlyentitleustoanextensionoftime . 1' k/ At no time was the work abandoned, but it was done in face of severe weatherconditions, and a large amount of extra work added to the contract work, and we respactrully request that the natter be investigated to theend that thesumof *411.1450 withheld from out final estimate Ue oruerea paid to us . Respectfully, Booker, Kiehl & Whipple ,CHK/K By C . H . Kiehl; 4 The petition of C . L . Dixon and wife , forthe vacation of a T!' N portion of the siPlatC . D . Hillman's Garden of Eden Addition, Division No . 5, filed with theBoardMarch21, 1917, and set down ror hearingfor MayS coming on regularly to be heard, sine was takn up and duiy 97' at considered, 10 o 'clock A .M a it appearing to the Board that due and .sufficient notice- of hearing hadbeenNgivenbypublicationintheofficialCountypaper, and the report of the Countyengineerbeingfavorable , said petition was by unanimous vote of the Board r granted , and the following described portion of plat of Hil1ita s Garden of f,J Eden Addition, Division No . .5, declared vacated from and after--this date; i. Lake View Boulevard lying between Blocks 359 and 342 bounded on theNorthwestbytheeasterlylineofRoad #1076 - Permanent HighwaeastandwestcentersectionlineofSection5, y #12a and the 1Twp . 23 N :, R . 5 •E : W .M ., and anthesouthwestbythenortherlylineofThirdAvenue ;Ali of Block 342 and all that portion of Block 359, t 1 east right or way line of the Kennydale-Renton County RoadHighwayNo . 12a .M The ressons for said propasedavacat4on areses`foilers3 I . 1st . That portion of Lake View Boulevard sought for vacation cannotbeusedaspartofaroadsystemorforstreetpurposesonaccountoritsexcessivegrade • t The following vouchers having been audited by the County Auditor and filedwiththeBoardforapproval , were on motion approved,oved, Messrs Ramsay and Knudsenvoting "Aye" , and Mr . Smith not voting:- ROAD MD . PAYROLLS: J . A . Kasen Wm . Puhhpll . At n1 13%50 0598N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-007- 85 APPLICATION NO(s).: SA- 007-85 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a multi- family complex totaling 186 units, having 17 buildings and a building for management and recreation. PROPONENT: Lincoln Property Company N.C., Inc. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North at the 2000 block. LEAD AC ENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed" environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS Responsib.e Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235- 2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to King County Superior Court no later than February 25, 1985. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building aid Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF )ECISION: February 6, 1985 PUBLICATION DATE: February 11, 1985 Ronald G. :Jelson Lary M. Sp inger ' Building ani Zoning Director Policy Deielopment 'rector 42-L.Lt-c." Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. SA_007-85, FCF-007T85_ PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION_ FOR SITE PJ AN APPROVAL TO Al LOw TEE-__ CONSTRUCTION OF A f1LILTT FAMTI Y COP'PI FX TOTAI I JNG 186 UNITS, HAVING 17 RIMS. AND A RIM TING FOR MANAGFITNT AND RECREATION. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS I OCATFD f LHE FAST SIDE OF I AKF WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK, POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE C E.R.C. ) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION C]DOES OES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL AWILL NOT BE RIEQUIRED. AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE IKI;IG MTV SUPERIOR COURT_ BY 5:00 P.M.; FEBRUARY 25, 1985 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CITY OF FiENTON LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY l , ni vj FEB 61985 February 5, 1985 BUILDI G/70NwC, DFr Mr. Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Dear Roger: I am writing as a follow-up to your letter dated February 4, 1985, and our meeting of the same date. Based upon our conversations and your letter, it seems to me that the E.R.C. ' s focus is upon four major areas. These are: 1 . LPC's marketing focus 2. Parking 3. Recreation 4. Design and aesthetics Marketing Focus - Briefly stated, our expectation at Marina Landing is to attract a higher rent dollar than any new apartment project anywhere in the city of Renton. We believe that a well-designed, well-managed and intelligently marketed project will attract the kind of clientele which Marina Landing demands. Let me illustrate it in this way. The project we all know as Country Hills was designed as a utility garden-type apartment complex of a "middle- of-the-road" quality. The average rent today at Country Hills is $362, or $.51 per rentable square foot. Our more recent project known as Woodcliffe was a substantial upgrade from Country Hills, designed to appeal to a higher income resident. By adding fireplaces, better finish work, better landscaping, cedar siding and tile roofs, we have produced a project which is generating an average rent today of $431 per unit or $.56 per square foot, a 19% increase above the average rents at Country Hills. At Marina Landing we will be going to a single-loaded, three-story building with less common walls and plumbing noise, but with more window space and views) and our new Cape Cod type design. We will be appealing to clientele 11400 S.E. 6th Street Suite 220 Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 455-4813 Roger J. Blaylock Page Two February 5, 1985 not unlike those now renting at our Bellevue Meadows apartments on 148th Avenue N.E. in Bellevue. Our current rents at Bellevue Meadows are an average of $497 per unit, or $.62 a foot. This is 15% higher than the average rent at Woodcliffe and 37% higher than the current rent at Country Hills. If I were to profile the "typical " resident at Marina Landing, he or she would exhibit the following characteristics. The average income per house- hold would range between $20,000-40,000, with a substantial percentage falling in the $30,000-40,000 category. The average age falls in the late 20's to early 40's range. Many of our units are rented by single individuals, with the balance going to roommates and young married couples. It has been our experience that most upper-income, unmarried residents prefer living alone. This is why most of our top-quality projects have approximately 50% one-bedroom units. Parking - It is our experience that the large percentage of upper-income, single residents in our projects own only one car. Some of the married couples in our projects choose to own one car and prefer to "car pool " or take the bus to work. With those residents who do own cars, we have noticed acontinued trend toward compact and sub-compact models. We are now discovering that devoting 50% of our total parking to the compact stall is more than adequate. We intend to provide one assigned, covered parking space for each apartment unit. The uncovered spaces will be adequate for those few residents that have more than one automobile and will accommodate guest parking as well . We anticipate that a number of residents will utilize public transit systems. In this regard, we would agree that one or perhaps two bus pull -out areas on either side of Lake Washington Boulevard would be helpful . We will agree to install the paved surface for the bus pull-out area on our property and will grant an easement in favor of Metro or the City for this purpose. Recreation - At the present time we are uncertain as to whether a one-story or two-story recreational facility will be constructed. However, we are certain as to what amenities will be provided in that facility. The amenities will include a swimming pool , jacuzzi , suntanning room, weight room, billiard room, card room, and in-house movie system viewing area. We have found that these amenities are most important in the minds of those type of residents who will be attracted to Marina Landing. Most of our residents who utilize the parks facilities across the street will probably do so for walking, jogging, picnicing, fishing and wind surfing. Aesthetics - I agree that the level of detail in our site plan review draw- ings is inadequate insofar as the building elevations are concerned. The buildings to be constructed at Marina Landing were designed specifically for that site. We have not built these buildings in the Northwest before, and I , therefore, do not have photographs of this specific building type to show you. However, I have included photographs of a recently completed pr,9ject C;T Y Cr FrNTi, 11- Lt FEB 61985 Roger J. Blaylock Page Three February 5, 1985 in Lynnwood, Washington--Alderbrooke Apartments. These photographs are quite similar to Marina Landing insofar as siding material , color scheme, window treatment, and roofing materials are concerned. I must point out, however, that the buildings in the photographs are substantially deeper because they are "double loaded") than the buildings designed for Marina Landing. Please note that the photos also depict a perspective of the entrance to the recreation building and a perspective of the carport structures. As we discussed, the buildings themselves are not susceptible to jogs within the structure. However, in order to provide additional relief along Lake Washington Boulevard, we will encounter changes in elevation of between 2 to 7 or 8 feet from building to building. Appropriate combinations of landscaping, berming, and intermittent fencing will also provide an attractive streetscape. I will be happy to provide details and/or cross- sections along the street frontage at whatever stage you feel this would be helpful . We have received very positive response from cities and residents alike for incorporating a brick "paver" effect at the entrance to some of our projects. This red cobblestone-like material looks good from the public's perspective, while creating a sense of identity for our residents. On another matter, you have requested that we share our intentions relative to vacating Lakeview Boulevard. It is our plan to request a deferral of offsite improvements for Lakeview and, ultimately, to effect its vacation. Please note that we have provided an area for a connection to Lake Washington Boulevard from the southern stretch of Lakeview in the event it is con- structed at a later date. I hope this answers the majority of your concerns. We are excited about Marina Landing and believe that it constitutes one of our most premier development opportunities in the Greater Seattle area. Yours truly, r, g'•-t :ira-- Scott B. Springer Vice President SBS:jp Enclosures Cr: flF\I net i,T) [ 1j t [ r-tI' I t. F E B 6 1985 L . OF I y ©BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR ZsmILP.0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 a 235-2540 co 0 94TFQ SE BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR February 4, 1985 Scott B. :pringer Vice President Lincoln Property Co. 11400 S.F. 6th Street Suite 220 Bellevue, WA 98004 Re: Environmental Review/Marina Landing Apartments Dear Mr. Springer: The Env'ronmental Review Committe met and discussed the Marina Landing Apartments on Wedn.sday, January 30, 1985, in relationship to environmental issues. The Committee could nit make a decision based upon inadequate information submitted in the application. They believe that specific information should be provided showing what type of market Lincoln Property Co. is tending to direct the housing toward. This is especially critical in their minds since the subject site is so unique and atypical based upon its location interrelationship with major public facilities, arterial access, and topography. They believe that, based upon the market that the project is directed to, such physical items as on- site recreation, parking, pedestrian movement, traffic generation, and emergency services vary. In this specific case, the most critical issues are usable year--rolmd on--site recreation and on--site parking. There is no public parking available in the ares, as a result of restricted parking on Lake Washington Blvd. and in the Park. The issues of pedestrian movement and stablization of the steep sloped properties appear to be have been addresses with traffic evaluations and the landscaping plans. Emergency access and fir( flow are technical problems and the Fire Department believes they will impact the final design. The Environmental Review Committee is also concerned about the interrelationships that will re33ult by introducing multiple family residential dwellings adjacent to the major public regional recreational facility of Gene Coulon Beach Park. Presently, there is very little residential activity adjacent to Gene Coulon Park, the first major residential develoiment could either significantly change the present recreational characteristics of the ar(:a and/or create the dominant housing trend. Theoretically, the Park could be dominated by extremely active or passive recreational functions. The ERC believes the adjacent residential housing types are factors in the ultimate activities of the Park. The Park his been designed to specifically limit the on site parking and provide a wide variety of recreational activities. Introduction of a large group of people that represents a narrow band of the general population will create a significant physical impact since the Park is designed to reflect the social recreational needs of the community. Scott B. Springer February 4, 1985 Page 2 The Committee also wishes you to clearly address the issue of on- site recreation and how it will effect the use at Gene Coulon Park. The site plan shows that area devoted to recreation on the subject site is less than typically devoted in most other residential projects within the City of Renton. In a comparable project of approximately 200 dwelling t.nits, three sports courts, three tot- lots, and a recreational field was required along with a recreational building because of the family orientation of the development. In another case of 244 multiple family dwelling units, it was required to provide approxime tely 1/2 acre of open recreational space surrounding the recreational building. The ERC clearly believes that it cannot allow this development to forego adequate on--site recreation because of its location adjacent to Gene Coulon Park. The second issue that needs to be clearly addressed is parking. No extra guest parking is provided on- site or storage areas for pleasure boats. It is estimated that because of the site's close physical relationship to the boat launch at the Park a need for storage could be generated. If the project is directed at the young professional couple, the project will have severe parking problems from initial occupancy, primarly because both of the people will probably have motor vehicles. Since there is no additional parking available in the Park or on the adjacent roadways, extra parking should be provided on- site for guest parking. It should be pointed out that all of your compact spaces are grouped together and we believe that it will create problems in servicing the adjacent units. The ERC is not overwhelmed by the project proposal presented for such a unique and valuable site in the City. They believe that this first project will set the tone for all the multiple family residential developments along Lake Washington Blvd North. The proposal has not teen sensitive in design for the general uniqueness of this area. Little imagination has been used in the buildings to create variable setbacks and positive design qualities. In addition, the proposal should address how Lincoln Property Co. is going to handle the issue of adjacent rights- of-way and their improvements. No statement has been forthcoming whether Lincoln Property tends to vacate those streets or improve them. Site plat approval requires that adjacent improvements be clearly designated in the review rrocess. Under slate law, the Environmental Review Committee could have issued a Declaration of Signific<.nce based upon these concerns. Another option would have been to issue a mitigated Declaration of Non- significance for other departments and agencies to commert along with the general public. The third option is for the applicant to evaluate the situation and proposed revisions in the project in the hope of saving review time in the environnental process. I will be availabe to discuss any of the options or the existing situation. For the Environmental Review Committee: 1V4— Roger . Blaylock Zoning Administrator. RJB:13J0Z:c1 I RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE REVIEWING )EPARTMENT: -T"RAFFI DATE CIRCUITED: JANUARY 18 , 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 29 , 1985 ECF - 007 - 85 APPLICATIO'A NO(s). SA-007-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT: LIRCOIN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. PROJECT TITLE: MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRU.T1ON OF 186 UNITS IN A MULTI-FAMILY COMPLEX OF SEVENTEEN BUILDINGS AND A BiIIlDING FOR MANAGEMENT AND RECREATION. LOCATION: IOCATED nN THE FAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK SITE AREA: 9.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth v 2) Air_ 3) Water 4) Plaits 5) Aninals 6) Eneigy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health t- 8) Lanc and Shoreline Use 9) Hou1 ing 10) Aesthetics 11) Ligt t and Glare i 12) Rec] eation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Pub:.ic Services 16) Uti:.ities COMMENTS: See attachment . Xv- RECOMMENDATION: 1 - ' DNS 1 1 MITIGATED DNS 1 ! EIS REVIEWED 3Y: Z' 444 TLE: DATE: FORM (/14 Due to the accummulative effect of anticipated growth of the subject area it is recommended that the following assessment be attached to the proposed development to help improve traffic conditions for that area. Traffic Volumes Increase Burnett Ave. N at Lake Wash. Blvd. (with development) 2,275 without development) 2, 160 115 or 5.32% Lake Wash. Blvd. at Lakeside site (with development) 6,680 without development) 6,340 340 5.32% Lake Wash. Blvd. north of Garden Ave. North with development) 8,595 without development) 7,800 795 10. 19% Type of Improvement Assessment Value a. Lake Wash. Blvd. & Lakeside entrance PART OF DEVELOP- provide 100% funding for cost of installing MENT PLAN centerlane left turn to site b. Provide off-site improvement on Lake Wash. Blvd. PART OF DEVELOP- curb, gutters and street lighting abutting property MENT PLAN c. Burnett Ave. North & Lake Wash. Blvd. North southbound merge lane on Lake Wash. Blvd. from Burnett Ave. North 300 LF @ 10/LF 3,000 @ 5.32% 160.00 d. Lake Wash. Blvd. between Park Dr. & Houser Way widen 800 linear feet of Lake Wash. Blvd. approx. 9 to 10 feet 800 LF @ $8.00/LF 6,400 @ 10. 19% 652. 16 e. Lake Wash. Blvd. & Garden Ave. North/Park Dr. N upgrade traffic signal controller for roadway widening 15,000 @ 10. 19%1 ,528.50 TOTAL ASSESSMENT AMOUNT 2,340.66 RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: E1'U(a1N FtJf )r DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 18 , 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 29 , 1985 ECF - 007 _ - 35 APPLICATION NO(s). SA-007-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT: LINCOLN PROPERTY COMFANY N.C. , INC. PROJECT TITLE: MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRtJ 'TION OF 186 UNITS IN A MULTI-FAMILY COMPLEX OF SEVENTEEN BUILDINGS AND A BJIIDING FOR MANAGEMENT AND RECREATION. LOCATION: IOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK SITE AREA: 9.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Eartl 2) Air_ 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: I 1,4 // 7g. erd t3 ( .1 yE S-f Ut d-SircaA a452-cre 5°' 0 e- (14.-c Se(74_ 11^"..-e Y-° a."4" 4"-; NI" G. J D S) 2 . !e r siY d ot.t.w'+'j. Cam'c /a / D-- Ye.,rt-''ke44e. RECOMMENDA1ION: J2Kr DNS f420 n MITIGATED DNS t ! EIS REVIEWED BY: gH-- 7 TITLE: DATE: u/85 FORM #14 RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: laDMALar06 vaiiNYi, DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 18 , 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 29 , 1985 ECF - 007 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SA-007-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT: LINCOLN ROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. PROJECT TITLE: MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUI:TION OF 186 UNITS IN A MULTI-FAMILY COMPLEX OF SEVENTEEN BUILDINGS AND A BIILDING FOR MANAGEMENT AND RECREATION. LOCATION: IOCATFD ON THE FAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK SITE AREA: 9.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air_ 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Hous._ng 10) Aesthetics 11) Ligh . and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 2 49 wiz Wi2'Olu-r2 X-e,e6-- Z-7-72eofee-g---, RECOMMENDATION: Q DNS n MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: ei C 04e w TITLE: 1"- J.C----FORM #14 RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SR REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: LJi Deg n DATE CIRCILATED: JANUARY 18 , 1985 COMMENTS DUE: ' ) 7: I:112r':.lf;85 ECF - 007 - 35 APPLICATICN NO(s). SA-007-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT: LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. 8 1985 PROJECT TITLE: MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 186 UNITS IN A MULTI-FAMILY COMPLEX OF SEVENTEEN BUILDINGS AND A BUILDING FOR MANAGEMENT AND RECREATION. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE FAST SIDE OF_LAKE WASHINGT N BLVD. NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK SITE AREA: 9.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air_ 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Rec:eation 13) His'.oric and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 3 et 4face--t- 5k6tA Ut `Ifigleqt8 lo 61-c/ S-( 1(42rc.1 w'rEk z[t kay n c 1; Cul _ -2 cr r aCCes.S -(;) Cnrc yton r2 i Se,GC/ )k) n o-E, &ctiAit ., - -D Looped w&lete- t.VA des vimlaCtU Ires 1)1601.e..3- 8),,s RECOMMENDATION: DNS 1764ITIGATED DNS 1-1 EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE ij.e P-(/% Q DATE: _ at FORM #14 E1`r.RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ( Aiii_(-(IS DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 18 . 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 29 , 1985 ECF - 007_ - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SA-007-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONEN1 : LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. PROJECT 1ITLE: MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 186 UNITS MULII-FAMILY COMPLEX OF SEVENTEEN BUILDINGS AND A BUILDING FOR MANAGEMENT AND RECREATION. LOCATION: iOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OFLAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK SITE AREA: 9.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesi hetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation l 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Trarsportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: n DNS pe., r-ct MITIGATED DNS El EIS I REVIEWED BY: 1` TITLE: /JT/,L/TY /VlT/1V ,e/A/ DATE: 7 FORM 114 I E RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE REVIEWIN 1 DEPARTMENT: !-C)Z.! G 4 i>-Eti t.c4rv EN--( DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 18 . 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 29 , 1985 ECF -_01_ - 85 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(s). SA-007-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) IA N 1 8 1985 PROPONENT: I INCOI N PROPERTY COMPANY I.C. , INC. Poi ICV DEVFLOPMFNT f1FPT. PROJECT TITLE: MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRICTION OF 186 UNITS IN A MULTI-FAMILY COMPLEX OF SEVENTEEN BUILDINGS AND A MIIDING FOR MANAGEMENT AND RECREATION. LOCATION: IOCATFD ON THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGT N BLVD. NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK SITE AREA: 9.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQU' INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air v// 3) Water l/ 4) Plaits 5) Animals 6) Ene:agy and Natural Resources 7) Env..ronmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing i. 10) Aesthetics L''' 11) Ligt t and Glare 12) Reci eation C/ 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Trarsportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities v COMMENTS: Pabi-se 1 v` ov 1tM. of Carrie.uvI,ovice de..) rdai euASF 4 khi zp I ic.o i • rhet jlr 155095 d v w Qeeemefv avuc •es S 4 '-, r,e zer)/e awo/,carAbwttft-073-8co • RECOMMENDATION: DNS 1 1 MITIGATED DNS Li EIS REVIEWED BY: S-titeCMG4.44.4-erliTITLE: 4.,,idli--#0.1....,, DATE: 12 lie_S FORM #14 ate.1 L it RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SR REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 18 . 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 29 , 1985 ECF - 00 = - _85 APPLICATION NO(s). SA-007-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT: LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. PROJECT TITLE: MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTLUCTION OF 186 UNITS IN A MULTI-FA1I1.Y COMPLEX OF SEVENTEEN BUILDINGS AND A BUILDING FOR MANAGEMENT AND RECREATION. LOCATION: IOCPT n ON THE FAST SIDE OF LAKE _WASHINGTDN BLVD. NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK SITE AREA: 9.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Ai: 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Enargy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Laid and Shoreline Use 9) HoJsing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Re:reation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 1u a, 'Cj441-1-1424--- RECOMMENDATION: ri DNS M MITIGATED DNS EIS REVIEWED BY: 0—W24.4GHQ- TITLE: r•Re DATE: ZT ' v FORM #14 I MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS 1) Concerns about traffic flow onto Lake Washington Boulevard. Must pro- vide channelization for 3rd lane turn in and out. 2) Solid core doors on all entrances with double locks. Dead bolts on all sliding glass doors to patios. 3) Each building adequately marked building with at least 12" letters or numbers, contrasting color to background. 4) Non-glare lighting on outsides of buildings and parking areas. 5) Adequate cleaning pads from site to eliminate the tracking of mud, etc. onto the public roadways. RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ARhc DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 18 , 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 29 , 1985 ECF - 007 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SA-007-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT : I INCOI N PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. PROJECT TITLE: MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 186 UNITS IN A MULTI-FAMILY COMPLEX OF SEVENTEEN BUILDINGS AND A BUILDING FOR MANAGEMENT AND RECREATION. LOCATION:__LOCATFD ON THE FAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK SITE AREA: 9.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT RE/IEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Ear:h 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Howing 10) Aesthetics 11) Ligt t and Glare 12) Recreation IV 4e 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Trarsportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: rile' fig c /L /T`J 170v rJ Pfr) 9-7e6I - FoX Boni R, Vs 7/c/4 Gc>r?-7 / 56,7 v/C S - Dv T/L-S POLE pa-r lf- eRRI! STi1 f APPLI c/9-,i..)T S7:70%J t-p 1. iV OGtJ / f=U iUiP L- / /eogceim sJ firolar SI/Ou I- p v6 U s )9 c Q f'eti 5 fi#ea- io c i7 ' /-2 c1 fi-o ie c//t . /J r! L it tp1i¢5 l7 ,? 4 I S ' v:6 Y /.3 v S Y s 7.Pc-T RN u u rc.cr 6 & // 5Cou?/d64'72 Tv cIPoll out Tu RECOMMENDATION: n DNS J - MITIGATED DNS I ! EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: z f DATE: c cam,,,,-, FORM (/14 LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY January 15, 1985 Mr. Roger J. Blaylock City of Renton Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS (FORMERLY KNOWN AS LAKESIDE) Dear Roger: The attached submission is for the Site Plan Review process required by the city of Renton. The documents include the application form, environmental checklist, legal description, owner's affidavit, architectural drawings, and utility drawings as required (six sets plus 8 1/2 x 11 reductions). Marina Landing is a 186 dwelling community overlooking Gene Coulon Park. The complex will include seventeen wood frame buildings that range in size from 4,845 sq. ft. to 9,690 sq. ft. In addition to the apartment buildings the development will include a building for management and recreation. A pool will be installed adjacent to this building. Parking will be provided per code with one covered stall per dwelling unit. Site development is confined to the buildable portions of the site with all buildings oriented toward the westerly view. The exterior finish of the buildings will convey a traditional motif with horizontal wood siding, white aluminum windows and black to grey roofing material. Wood siding will be painted, grey-blue or beige with white trim to set off each building. Site development will be designed to minimize the extent of cut and fill. Special care will be taken along the base of the steep slope areas to the north and east of the developed portion of the site. Cleared slopes in this area will be protected during construction and will be planted with vigorous, fast- growing ground covers (See Landscape Plan). Remedies in the event of soil slippage include: a. Stake affected area with visqueen until favorable weather permits restoration. b. Application of jute fabric to slow erosion until ground covers are established. c. Redirect drainage to minimize impacts. 11400 S.E. 6th Street Suite 220 Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 455-4813 Mr. Roger Blaylock Page Two January 15, 1985 Landscaping for Marina Landing will be installed in accordance with city of Renton requirements. Special attention will be given to the street frontage. In order to create a natural transition we will endeavor to preserve the views from the dwelling units while creating a sense of privacy at ground level. Special attention will be given to the main entrance to the development. Roger, I would like to call your attention to the fact that the Environmental Checklist submitted has been completed under Section A thereof, and the last page has been signed. Under Section A(11) I have incorporated by reference the previous Environmental Checklist, Final Declaration of Non-significance and Memorandum of Concurrence. Since the project has undergone no substantive change since the issuance of those documents, I would request that a Memorandum of Concurrence be issued indicating that no further environmental review is necessary. I would also like to indicate that the Checklist is intended to pertain to the site plan approval and the building permit application. Roger, if you need any further information please let me know. Yours truly, Scott B. Springer Vice President SBS:jp cc: John Phillips Len Milbrandt SEE ATTACHED AFFIDAVITS Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). Lots 357 and 358, C. D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden, Division No. 5, situate in King County, Washington U Tracts 340, 341 and 343, and Vacated Tracts 342 and 359, ALL in UC. D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden No. 5 as per plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, on page 83, records of King County; TOGETHER WITH that portion of Lake View Blvd. (104th Ave. S.E. ) vacated1 11 by Order of the County Commissioners, which attached thereto by operation of law; EXCEPT that portion of vacated Tract 359 conveying to King County for road by deed recorded under Recording No. 1029408; Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. AFFIDAVIT ICa r) being duly sworn, declare that I am 4'authorized representative to act fore property owner, (owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS I15th DAY OF January 1985 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT Kirkland, Washington King County Lincoln Property Company N.C. , Inc. by Na e of No tary Public) Signature of Owne 9900 NE 137th Kirkland, Washington 11400 SE 6th St. , Suite 220 Address) • Address) A 4 Bellevue, WA 98004 iI 1 ^ City) State) (Zip) 206) 455-4813 • 2 7 -: Cr_•p_e_4 fit e 1 c i ss+i Acceptance of this application and roqukea flinggAM____ tit A application. Plans and other malortats removed to i e ti o M!!' t Application Procedure.' a r 4 k r!' the APP 4- 4'+ 4 r. ram .".: :, St •'"' 'r r. ', r ''' .e''' 9 pY •• OF I 4/ ECF: ECG- oo 7- d 0 4$ © z City of Renton LU sue ,_ °° -' o IMMO ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLISTOQ qTfD SEP1- Purpose of -hecklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probatale significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your )roposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instruction: for Applicants: This envirommental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer th,; questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best descriptior you can. Yoc must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observatio is or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answe] , or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply.' Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. 1 he agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Co replete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPRO.IECT ACTIONS (part D). Fcc nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1.Name of proposed project, if applicable: Marina Landing (formerly known as d :eS i e)) 2.Name of applicant: Lincoln Property Company INC. , Inc. 3.Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Scot : B. Springer 11400 SE Sth St. , Suite 220 Bellevue, WA 93004 206) 455-4313 4.Date checklist prepared: 1/15/35 - This Checklist; 5/13/34 - Previous Checklist; ccl Declaration of Non-sinnificancei:ssued 3/3/34; Memorandum of Concurrence issued 5.Agency requesting checklist: 0/10/34. Copies of the aforegoing are attached hereto. Building & Loning; Hearing Examiner 6.Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 12 months following start of construction. The procct will be built in one phase. 7.Do you have any pla For future additions. expansions, I urther activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Previous Environmental Checklist dated 5/18/84, Final Declaration of Non- significance dated 8/3/84, and Memorandum of Concurrence dated 9/19/84. Copies of the aforegoing are attached to this Checklist. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes. explain. None known. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Site plan approval , building permits, steet access permit, right-of-way access permit from Burlington Northern Railroad, and storm drainage connection permit. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The project will consist of 186 woodframe, 3-story, multi-family apartment units on approximately 9.7 acres. This is the same project described on the Environmental Checklist dated 6/18/84. There has been no substantial change in the project, nor has there been any new information concerning the project since the filing of the previous checklist, and the issuance of the Declaration of Nonsignificance and Memorandum of Concurrence pertaining to the Proponent's rezone application. The Proponent believes that the current project is completely covered by the previously submitted Environmental Checklist (a copy is attached)* 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section. township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Proposal site lies uphill from Lake Washington Boulevard, above Gene Coulon Park. Well upslope from the project, to the east, is Interstate-405. The bulk of the project is a gently sloping terrace, currently in use as a golf driving range. This portion of the site is largely open, in grass or pavement. Approximately one-quarter of the site is on steep slopes, covered with brush and dense tree growth. Much of this portion of the site would be left in its undistrubed condition by the proposed rezone development. The site has views across Lake Washington to the west. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example. caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. 11 . (cont. ) Proponent requests that the City issue a Memorandum of Concurrence in this regard. 2 - SEE ATTACHED ENVIf IENTAL CHECKLIST DATED 6/18/84' e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 2.AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air. if any: 3.WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 3: Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 3 - SEE ATTACHE" 'NVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATED E "784) 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the sysiei n(s) ai-e expected to sere. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. 4 - SEE ATTACHm ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATED r "8/84) d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: 4. Plant s a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other o Shrubs o grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any:y S.Ar imals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other r\` mmals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. 5 - SEE ATTArNFD ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATEn A/18/84) d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, it any: 6.Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: 7.Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. I) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 6 - SEE ATTACI ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATED 8/34) 2) What types and levals of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 8.Lanc and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. c. Describe any structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 7 - SEE ATTACHED FNIVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATED 6/14 /84) 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com,.__.ble with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: 9.Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 8 - SEE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATED 6/ 18/84 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 14. Tr+insportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe indicate whether public or private). 9 - e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 15. Public Services a. Would tire: project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Lincoln Property Company N.C. , Inc. Proponent: by Name Printed: Scott B. Springer, Vice resides 10 - 176 11-8-84 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. Environmental Checklist No. PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance a Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS : Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow ail of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being .used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many- of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent Anna Phinney, Marjorie L. Lotto 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: Scott B. Springer, Lincoln Property Co. , N.C. , Inc. 11400 S.E. 6th, Suite 220 Bellevue, WA 98004 455-4813 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist Renton Planning Department 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Lakeside 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - PROJECT DESCRIPTION, Pages 1-2 s 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - PROJECT DESCRIPTION, Pages 1-2 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - PROJECT DESCRIPTION, Pages 1-2 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST- PROJECT DESCRIPTION, Pages 1-2 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - PROJECT DESCRIPTION, Pages 1-2 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes , explain: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - PROJECT DESCRIPTION, Pages 1-2 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: See NNVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - PROJECT DESCRIPTION, Pages 1-2 II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE NC b) Disruptions, displacements . compaction or over- covering of the soil?X YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X YE3— MAYBE FY— d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X YET— MAYBE N-6— e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , Xeitheronoroffthesite? YES- MAYBE NO f) Changes_ in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X YET— MAYBE AU— Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Page 3 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X Y MAYBE NU— b) The creation of objectionable odors? YES MAYBE Ng c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X DES AliYYBEWU— Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? X YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X TES— MAYBENU— c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MA— YBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? NI;(Yes MAYBE N0 e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES MAYBE NU— f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X YET— MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate. phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria. or other substances into the ground waters?X YEms- MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , Xmicrofloraandaquaticplants)? YES MAYBE A b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or Xendangeredspeciesofflora? YES MAYBE W c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X YES -MAYBE NI— d) Reduction In acreage of any agricultural crop? X YET— WYE NS Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? X YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X ES— RKTETE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X VET- M YBE NO Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or X glare? YES MAYBE 1TU— Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X Y1:5 M YBE N Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: - a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? TB— MAYBE WO-- Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X VT MAYBE k Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X Y S MAYBE WU— Explanation: See ENVIRONMFNTAI CHECKLIST FNVTRONMFNTAI IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? X YES M YBE N(S c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X YES MAYBE N --- d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X fEs-- M-Ty-ffr Nm e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X YES MAYBE NU— Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? X YES MAYBE NU— b) Police protection? X YES MAYBE N c) Schools? X YES MAYBE NU— d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services?X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YES- MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X DES MAYBE WU— Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas?X YES FaTit d0 b) Communications systems? X YES MAYBE NO c) Water?X YES MAYBE NO 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? X YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage? YES RAT FIT f) Solid waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X i YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result-in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 20) Archeological Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration off a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? Yes- MAYBE NO Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information 1 is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- 1 ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: signed Sc47/74- S I—I- a. name printedl J City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROPONENT Anna Phinney, and Marjorie L. Lotto Care of Their Representative, Scott B. Springer Lincoln Property Co. , N.C. Inc. 11400 S.E. 6th, Suite 220 Bellevue, Washington 98004 455-4813 CHECKLIST SUBMITTED AGENCY REQUIRING CHECKLIST Renton Planning Department BACKGROUND I.6 Nature and Description of the Proposal : Proposal site is approximately 10 acres. The proposed zoning would allow not more than 186 dwelling units to be built. Conceptual design work has started, but will not be completed pending final rezone approval . Development would not approach maximum density allowed under proposed zoning. Sufficient on-site parking would be provided, as well as resident amenities, including swimming pool , recreation building, sauna, jacuzzi and lush landscaping. I.7 Location of Proposal : The proposal site lies uphill from Lake Washington Boulevard, above Gene Coulon Park. Well upslope from the project, to the east, is Interstate-405. The bulk of the project is a gently sloping terrace, currently in use as a golf driving range. This portion of the site is largely open, in grass or pavement. Approximately one-quarter of the site is on steep slopes, covered with brush and dense tree growth. Much of this portion of the site would be left in its undisturbed condition by the proposed rezone development. The site has views across Lake Washington to the west. I .8 Estimated Date for Completion of Proposal : The estimated date for completion is 12 months following project initiation. I 4 I.9 List of Permits, Licenses and Government Approvals: Rezone to R-3; Building Permit; Street Access Permit; Right-of-Way Access Permit, Burlington Northern Railroad (sewer) ; Storm Drainage Connection Permit. I.10 No future additions, expansions or further activity related to this proposal is planned. I.11 Applicant has no knowledge of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by the proposal . 1.12 Rezone application is being submitted concurrently with this form. Future applications will be made as required for approvals listed underI.9, above. LL II . 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION See Appendix A for Checklist portion of Application Form) II.1 Earth Existing Conditions : The site has previously been used for a quarry operation. The upper substrata over much of the site is granular fill material left by this operation. The native soils below are a mix of sandy silts, gravelly and silty sands and similar compact, but unconsolidated, materials. See Appendix C for the complete text of the Preliminary Geotechnical Study prepared for the site. Impacts : Development of residential units would modify the topography to provide suitable grades for parking and building pads. This modification will include disruptions, compactions and covering of existing soils in those developed portions of the project. Mitigating Measures : The preliminary report (Appendix C) reveals no unusual or difficult problems related to earthwork development on the site. Conventional building practices, coupled with regulated control of runoff collection and release, will allow for development without creation of hazardous or unstable conditions. On-site cut and fill is projected to be roughly in balance. Excess cut would be disposed of off-site at an approved location. Moderate amounts of imported select fill will likely be needed to prepare suitable, stable subgrades for structures. II.2 Air Impacts: The addition of auto traffic generated by the project would be the only significant source of air pollutants from the proposal . Traffic volumes are addressed in the Appendix B, Traffic Analysis. Temporary particulate emissions are to be expected during construction. Mitigating Measures : No measures for auto emissions other than providing for smooth flow of traffic into and within the project are foreseen. Dust from construction work can be minimized by good operational technique as required by local regulations. II.3 Water Existing Conditions : There are no perennial or intermittent streams on the project site. The site is well vegetated, so runoff is well controlled and is largely limited to minor overland sheet flow. Substantial volumes of water are reabsorbed on the site. Impacts: Existing runoff and absorption patterns would be altered by removal of vegetation during site preparation and development of impervious surfaces . Absorption would be reduced and the rate and volume of runoff would increase. 3 Mitigating Measures : Detention and control of increased runoff would comply with City requirements (Title IV, Chapter 29) , including development of a drainage plan and submission for review and approval . II.4 Flora Existing Conditions : The site, at present, is vegetated, the lower and more level areas mostly in grasses ; the upland slopes in brush and trees. Impacts: The proposal requires a major alteration to the more level portions of the site. Peripheral tree and shrub masses adjacent to property lines and Lake Washington Boulevard would be retained wherever possible. The steep forested slopes would be left largely undisturbed. Mitigating Measures : The proposal envisions generous relandscaping of the site, both for internal amenity and as screening at property lines. This landscaping would potentially increase the overall floral diversity of the site. II.5 Fauna Existing Conditions: No survey has been done of existing fauna but the site has suitable habitat for numerous common animals and birds of the Puget Sound area. Impacts: Habitat destruction would largely be limited to the areas currently in use as the golf driving range, a habitat of limited diversity and productivity. Overall faunal diversity and quantity may decrease. Mitigating Measures: Landscape development could provide new or modified habitat. Upslope forest and habitat edges would be maintained and largely undisturbed. II.6 Noise Impacts: Proposal would somewhat increase local traffic noise. Whether an increase would be measurable is unknown. There would be temporary increases in noise levels during construction. Mitigating Measures : On-site mechanical equipment and construction equipment should be muffled and maintained. Construction work could be restricted to 7 AM to 5 PM hours. II.7 Lights and Glare Existing Conditions : Golf driving range has lighting for night operation. 4 r Impacts: May be reduced by proposed change in land use. Mitigating Measures : Any site lighting for proposal would be designed to minimize off-site glare. II.8 Land Use Proposal would alter present land use from golf driving range to use in accordance with the local Comprehensive Plan. • II.9 Natural Resources No effect on natural resources identified. II.10 Risk of Upset No risks forseen. II.11 Population Impacts: The proposal would add not more than 186 dwelling units to a property which is not currently residential in character. Except as a component of current growth being experienced by the City of Renton, proposal should have no role as a target or trigger for additional growth or relocation in the area. II.12 Housing Impacts: The proposal will add to the number of dwelling units available in the Renton area, potentially reducing housing pressure on other units in the area. II .13 Transportation/Circulation Existing Conditions: Refer to Appendix B, Traffic Analysis, for thorough review of the existing traffic situation and impacts. No public transit currently operates on Lake Washington Boulevard. Mitigating Measures : The traffic study prepared for this proposal concludes no noticable increase_ in traffic volume on the surrounding streets as a result of the proposed development. Recommended measures are limited to regulating and easing flow in and out of the project with on-site roadway design. II.14 Public Services Existing Conditions : The site is within the jurisdictional area of the Renton Fire and Police Departments and within the Renton School District. The site contains a golf driving range available to the public and is adjacent to the newly expanded recreational facilities of Gene Coulon Park. 5 Impacts: The proposal would generate slight impacts on the Renton Fire and Police Departments. No special problems of significant demands are foreseen, nor would proposal effect current levels of service elsewhere in the community. The impact on school populations would depend upon the eventual population mix in the developed units, but would probably be limited. The proposal would add potential user population of park facilities in the Renton area. II.15 Energy Impacts: The proposal would increase demand on energy utilities for residential usage. II.16 Utilities Existing Conditions: Water and sewer facilities are available in the site area, although they present some access difficulties. No storm drainage system is presently developed in the area. Reserve capacity of the utilities is reported as sufficient for project needs by the Public Works Department. Impacts: No major problems are, therefore, expected in utility acquisition. II.17 Human Health No impacts foreseen. II.18 Aesthetics No degradation of aesthetics foreseen for proposed changes. II.19 Recreation Existing Conditions : Golf driving range currently occupies a major portion of the site. Impacts: Range would be eliminated. No other significant recreational impacts foreseen. II.20 Archeological/Historical No known archeological or historical resources occur on the site. 6 1 4 s Fi• N I B T T 1r.U C 1t D Rrwratu r N ut. It cw wt L RAINIER l/'TP POINT 2 ' I I7RD K. r°t"' BEACH KENNYDAL /N.:17R0 ' . sr • N: uND 1R ' t S, t 1 NOMTY•r•t•... i tT N MST R f . N T= 4P 5 s(i N , )STN ST w t[w' ` N i 7[TM S7 t S• J:• ieafT•• ! o N ]IrN K I ' 'gyp r r..,•,r O 4 IOwI Lake y N 73TN fT MI[ S'^PI RIM k is.. q N 71i^ST r 6 9J .S M YTN {l_ »[ loss L. on 41 GCOZ`C CSTI N 19 4 41 1 g Tea s h Z n g t o n I14' aT 3 COOPER 1.. iQ,4. z f KW. ` SC : <' Arc • P. I I 0 ' 5 vra.N ±m '^Nr;•.5_Tf,3F , xis, n tjl ' S P.l"• 4j N 1...J r UhNTCq 9Ft J 4 YItc) S r ,1 A PR NT• s 3 i •\P• r of 1 s 4 . _ ...... . . . .. .•••.•... .• _. _. _.•••• ._ ... -i.,\ ssE Isl.s-srs e e J r . Rl.tcw ww.I i w ... ilgi sr M°z P ® T R S a ''ST1••••I, - k '• O try b } J o. 4 a w S FOUNTAIN p Y T 2" P• L— SST ..N -=14 a! u : PQ $$ 3rw -„: ®111111111, Tx 3 n ir» , S 5 114r»> 5T S' r $F s i f U!T S 117'N.A S 't't l•Tn ® a,.: ', Ssr r " i 1$ .. :IJTw 3C I. 'RING ST....O •< r• S:fi:lll®, S r- n" I .sn•r»Sr ti-.. o •n6T" a CC1 I; o ••\ aI > S 1+T.IST %'Tor..s. e > S S M S Urn. ST a' I" 4:. < N t. K ST f . 6 I I)TN I I/w•pw S \ R ST..S,er.Pl'1i t 1.8t' r...-. S A ( '' Z- I. r» •` > a u ,I 1... p 3TM C®i" N t $ N ^ ^ S../Irb a II® 1 I i I' O II v R =c , J li T = .1 1 w N [TN. ST T 12DTN•' y w 120"i re. T : 11 1' w51Ii • Ie'^-I tt.• 120 4 Vci.••P• TrL 121 7. I 5 3 12Ur m T 1 ' s t 1• A 4 j :Is u< 3••'••i N Sp<I I 1' 177ND- STR . 1 ' 1,TN•SYr r 7vtt,,,,,.„ 1 4 ` c~ S S i22r•C m T n»1T 1 0 M( 23"0 5T" y i 1 j .or» s = jr•..4 u '; .11. " P'S-'..:1'.Y /w rl0) :23".oK .': i1 1 1 Y 5 ' y i24 .• s S . i,s;l2ai" • 5T I"sr 71011 1 '1 N ITM T ;. f. ,. Si lsrNST•` v. i yl•1y cat rs •® w RCA OR `9. « N N " J i •vT[, ' r' S S•• 8l' 17eTk T } R 1j TN > Sf..., I V i 114 SRIsrNI.m i Ns' Z, .9. lak 5 '>a""S:d, '\..s`' 1 ,it1\ ' sr'ar... , > 7,, zl _.' 2S4 •° K`r s $i28r»• I If sr_ 1 ttt , - ST$, s. + m: 5` - e,„ I' . 1'. N r J tit" , r n' 12 .-i .- ins Sr . ,. .'.6". sdaii ST o » qCo L ra II i n r aNGSTON r+RD. TO ':• PORT WV ' 1 ® i 3 . /• I ' tIG O ' ti.!•. T Slllfr CT c., ....S T r 7ss.a STg a 4\y\ M 02 5r !JJ"o T . w.t.Lrl. f{, t 3 d S••TONY" ST=' . , .„..q4111111 * 7 ,. r I. $ '30 r" '+ ; i 1 r•CTD3.•Sr u 4 NV'r.. / 4 0, 1Yy S -r e a , t"• . 3g _f 7NoF ,,,U ST • a°°= i/• MVI.•• ,- RRR s tar» st o0 y, "rf r RO ' r. . : " i S n T. 7" T• c. q0 ii ...S• ,' it•." , .. -',L 3 ,3 Y is _ fi tv" \ ' J• f ITN a 1... P.oltr3[ S BLi+:.[:SI w1;"' >4 r+ld SUNS T • ® S SN Tr" •ES.• 3l •' RT ,c\ :\ RI\'E.F+ ,,,, 7. 3 EAFLI. T( 3-.' sr r q t d erN g'4r .. I,{LS1_= $T• • 'DF i+Sa ITs n. ST • 3 rut i q Pl .. s 143•r sr Will h/. ®S! 'TN ; o ST; S:rrw R 5% C S 4.- Ulf CMS! e„ S iaar.ST -_ i f' Er:.wwtw rs B + " r . m s' j...\ CM 1 • DI " g^ 1 I\ l.N Stmw.r I SEP or 1984 0518N MEMORANDUM OF CONCURRENCE APPLICATION NO(s): R-073-84 DESCRIP LION OF PROPOSAL: Application to rezone approximately 7.9 acres of property zoned P-1 (Public Use) and 1.8 acres of property zoned R-1 Residential Single Family) to R-3 Residential Multiple Family) for a future multi-family development having approximately 186 housing units. PROPONE NT: Lincoln Property Company N.C., Inc. LOCATIO V OF PROPOSAL: Located along the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North at the 2000 block (currently the site of the Renton Golf Range). LEAD AGENCY: Building and Zoning Department DATE OF ERC REVIEW: September 19, 1984 Acting a!; the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined that the requested modifications to the initial proposal reviewed under ECF-070-84 on August 15, 1984 are within th 3 scope of that original proposal and the environmental determination of non-signif,cance is still valid. This decision was reached following a presentation by Jerry Lind of the Building and Zoning D 3partment. Oral comments were accepted from: Ronald Nelson, Richard Houghton, Michael Parness, James Bourasa, James Matthew, Jerry Lind, Gary Norris, and Gene Williams. Incorporated by reference in the record of proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-070-34 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Form, prepared by: Scott B. Springer, dated June 18, 1984. 2. ApI lication(s): Rezone (R-073-84). SIGNATUF.ES: Ronald G. Nelson Michael Par s Building and Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor Ri hard C. Houghton Public Works Director INFORMA TION: This Memc randum of concurrence corrects an error on the application form in which the total 9.7 a.res was designated as being currently zoned P-1. Y J t 0494N FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s):R-073-84 Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-070-84 Description of Proposal: Application to rezone 9.7 acres of property from P-1 to R-3 for a future multi-family development having approximately 186 housing units. Proponent: Lincoln Property Company N.C., Inc. Location of Proposal: Located along the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North at the 2000 block (currently the site of Renton Golf Range). Lead Agency: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on July 3, July 11, August 8, and August 15, 1984, following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Richard Houghton, Gary Norris, Jerry Lind, James Hanson, Ed Wooten, Gene Williams, Ronald Nelson, Roger Blaylock, James Bourasa, and Robert Bergstrom. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-070-84 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Form, prepared by: Scott B. Springer, dated June 18, 1984. 2. Applications: Rezone (R-073-84). 3. Traffic analysis prepared by Transportation Planning and Engineering Inc., June 1984. 4. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Building and Zoning Department, Design Engineering Division, Traffic Engineering Division, Utilities Engineering Division, Fire Prevention Bureau, Policy Development Department, and the Police Department. 5. Recommendation for more information: Parks and Recreation Department. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: The subject rezone request is issued this final declaration of non-significance subject to the following conditions being complied with: 1. Development shall be limited within the contour elevations illustrated on the site plan submitted to the Building and Zoning Department on August 3, 1984. 2. Ten (10) feet of property along Lake Washington Boulevard shall be dedicated to the City for future street improvements. 3. Lake Washington Boulevard is to be widened to three (3) lanes per approval of the Public Works Department. 4. Lake Washington Boulevard and Lakeside entrance provide 100% funding for cost of installing centerlane left turn to site. FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE LINCOL V PROPERTY COMPANY N.C., INC.: ECF-070-84, R-073-84 AUGUS1 20, 1984 PAGE 2 5. P-ovide off-site improvements on Lake Washington Boulevard for the full 42 feet of right-of-way including curbs, gutters, street lighting, etc., abutting the property. 6. Street improvements required for Burnett Avenue North and Lake Washington B)ulevard North southbound merge lane on Lake Washington Boulevard from B Jrnett Avenue North 300 LF at 10/LF $3,000 at 5.32%. The assessment due to tie City of Renton at the time of building permit issuance shall be $160.00. 7. Street improvements required for Lake Washington Boulevard between Park Drive and Houser Way widen 800 linear feet of Lake Washington Boulevard approximately 9 to 10 feet. 800 LF at $8.00/LF. $6,400 at 10.19%. This assessment due to the CLty of Renton at the time of building permit issuance shall be $652.16. 8. Street improvements required for Lake Washington Boulevard and Garden Avenue North/Park Drive North upgrade traffic signal controller for roadway widening. 5,000 at 10.19%. The assessment due to the City of Renton at the time of building permit issuance shall be $1,528.50. The total assessment amount dues of $2,340.66. INFORMATION: The southeast portion illustrated on the site plan dated August 3, 1984, does not meet City ordnance. Private parking cannot extend onto city right-of-way as shown. SIGNATURES: hva,„),' Ronald C. Nelson ichael Parness Building and Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor Richard 2. Houghton Public Works Director PUBLISHED: AUGUST 20, 1984 APPEAL DATE: SEPTEMBER 3, 1984 4, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 070 - 84 APPLICATION No(s) : REZONE (R-073-84) PROPONENT: LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. PROJECT TITLE: THE LAKESIDE Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE 9.7 ACRES OF PROEPRTY FROM P-1 TO R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 186 DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION: LOCATED ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK. (CURRENTLY THE SITE OF THE RENTON GDLF RANGE) SITE AREA: 9.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (Gross) : N/A DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1) Topographic Changes : X x 2) Direct/Indirect Air Quality: x 3) Water & Water Courses : x x 4) Plant Life:x x 5) Animal Life: x 6) Noise: x 7) Light & Glare: x 8) Land Use; North: MOBILE HOME PARK East : UNDEVELOPED South: UNDEVELOPED West : MUNICIPAL PARK, LAKE WASHINGTON Land Use Conflicts : MINOR View Obstruction: MINOR 9) Natural Resources : X 10) Risk of Upset : X 11) Population/Employment : X 12) Number of Dwellings : 186 X 13 ) Trip Ends ( ITE) : 186 X 5.6 = 1042 TRIPS Traffic Impacts : ALONG LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD 14) Public Services : X 15) Energy: X 16) Utilities: X 17) Human Health: X 18) Aesthetics : X 19) Recreation: ._ X 20) Archeology/History: X Signatures : 440&'2,4w.f.—, ' Ronald G. Nelson Michael P ess Building & Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor ifitf/i/(PUBLISHED: AUGUST 20, 1984 R i a nd C. Hou"gh n APPEAL DATE: SEPTEMBER L J.964 __ Public Works Director I r 1.!-- rao LAND USE UNIT MIX TOTAL SITE AREA 422,532 S.F. (9.7 ACRES) 93 A UNITS (667 S.F.): 62,031 S.F. O BUILDING COVERAGE 59,847 S.F. (14.2%) 36 B UNITS (842 S.F.): 30,312 S.F. 17? 0 40 PAVED AREAS 99,827 S.F. (23.6%) 57 C UNITS (948 S.F.): 54,036 S.F. r, CONCRETE WALKS 14,062 S.F. (3.3%) 186 TOTAL UNITS 146,379 S.F. RECREATION AREA 10,800 S.F. (2.6%) DENSITY 19.1 UNITS/ACRE ccciccicc ° r ao P OPEN SPACE 237,216 S.F. (56.3%) 1110 160 APPROEWATE El TENT OF CLEARING -- . ' cC. v ` L T \ O i w i AND °PADNpj cco PARKING VICINITY MAP P 197 STANDARD I G c 72 COMPACT LASt IAe"wOTON j; c 10 HANDICAP PROJECT' a1 c N.E.DTN ST. c o ° 279 TOTAL STALLS (1.5: 1) SITE— GENE COLON J/ f 04 1 eEACM PARK— ) 1 ..: Iteljlli„. 00 4, tEATRE POO eoEluD T. n MEMTOM1 7 •1 G PLANT j r i' v T miaow ti A..' T. - 1 \--- S -eMISrIMGPMOPOArLSIE il, ilfirk r, \ \ • el -,. ','I. . ',,'‘ C' 0 Of" CG' Av,-\ I 1 ' ' 'F.--; 2 14---- •,::::- ----- rao 8 C+- r• 3. ` 6 • To ' I 0 ,2\ '-`"(..p." tp \`1• r W ,a. °y"" .•// r +: 11K c — ciA • c, soot 5 , i a r t? L, , .g p r ..t.; ,\ ` v0 IAVD. 1 af.' p" o B , BUILDING SETBACK UM TYP.- NGIOiA IOATN AYE.SLR PROPERTY LNS TrP.-- pKI.O.W. SITE PLAN MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS NORTH A LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY DEVELOPMENT w // 186 UNITS 279 PRK'G SPACES SHOWN I 1 MILBRANDT/BARKER ARCHITECTS 1 4o. r P{,tA_L IVD 1 Joil—ArlLT TRL' FIR c•T 14 cAaHCRaf -+S5 0G.. 1 1. I ` .1) tor TREE-4.-ri-r call I, .'•.._.... -_.•_.. 0,,,4 -M1ME+WW-lo aa..41 nawwee- dE •c ciOVCY v!O t i CArIUJRJB.» AG[2N nTTR+G- aWtRu.15 r - t C.C.flROlf !WT•[ 7...t-Xtet FR ee( 1C crawaa .2,06 4 rr IAA,PTYN r7rEP•/•• semcoo n•MTe EXTQJT O 0—HowleraN • 1 ler,.. Z"...' (T p c..,savNe • c•aJo 0--wa v. •wEwr Try-st:.c rut: 360 p W';Nt. KaJ.-1 - 1`t\kW:A/ `. t o--NK nMlb LII! fl2th rJ Fiabte..,. , rror r• 0 1 0--_ aNe.l •w! 320.112th 5W 1l o Everett,WA. d\t tlw..CtL IM'Jf ..wrLlt 247-2954 w}\.. ee d 13--iatN ',+R O-s+Ymr:lA rwwci Mo/brt v e.Rw+wa.Q.UOo 745-1255 4* (m) ,' -4• -ie-. t.w*N J_1 X..... i!- -.\ r i- e.a ARR4-Blau ,.ca.+x CmwR•cn pc A 1P-EV,J.N iP"R 5.-, t`!°A k t. LAMP-nr,8880ZO SPON Jr. n1.4.44 5r•,P+iRn-5- AND'AAA- 9_ `` wr1•W WIIX 2"{I'NC wc nUW1. I pu '• 7/.` W r• ey Y}fRd05Y0 F..-NITa f ATA,tit=4.YtWlw 514845 nut. At., q 1y ARM, WITH A 2-I•OLtPR.GR CAP•41erc SHA.t. r.0 aF Jure. rte5*1 G1o,:wr cor+lRD.. WADI N7 6 i ' . 4X ud n' a.) a a 1, a 1 I j Sea iff1 n- 0'440 C •'i I III i 111 0',.: 5 R,,_C r 11 m a: ..., Il illlll I,fr 0. OR.. t... •!40 w III I III III I i lia e OO.o..!t z y, J fit i .. ' ' t i!I,IIj 111l11J Tt 0O a` q "b'a l_, y .--- j',,. III II 11111 k 1------ j1 1, ,,, i ( /s."i1T 4.. a / w` IhII•ill1IjiI,pele~ odd`o,` O V I `ll h N ff• A E do,Abb..., ,e tt,•,,. i 1 Q1e P' I - t -y..r'' by Ji.Y p\ 0. . O`, N `O P ` o Ivt v' - I 1' 1 jeeI1 4 A • O igpII II I aluIpn .I: V fi p r' r r W I 1 ao- _ - weir• --- tviitik..._,t '4':.:' .-- 1 \```B 4\'O1111P 11` 11.- - l' W; li1111 1!Illli l1111111 IN Jit. iifa' n 'r`o e s, a e N• it ! i yy O- \ y!1 t•4 r rLNTpJR a e' rbw 1 (i 1 74- 1. 11Y ,< .: lq{AY-1 cP - IcM 4. ;.» s ° • t 2-z..,, 1,-. kJ:tot,„•.\..ii i M.& e„,.... ,.0 . , ifip-._.e. hvk ,... A...; 4,:.,-- 1. I 10,4 , 4%- 1.1.1 1i mlula DET L «...- t111111.LARTINO a s,ac.R1 t..., 11'e-- r*`y •• •••`+•~- i '-, o.MY _l 14....r M L F:".8 1irri. ino, 1.7,.i5..t••'s - i"{13'r' r110 1 J d-A s OW ROOFING TILE c u Aluu. SLIDING WINDOWS AND DOORS CEDAR SIDING Tr:' r c 1 i, § - ts,—; -- --1., _. T 4t! i_ V 1 i I ir r D ta[ UP I END ELEVATION 1 f 1 BUILDING TYPE 1 9 r—I CI' .' ,C' ,C' e a i i,._ iii lit -Inkl! 7,T, i!ELII!!.4111 I_W.IUL- laElli tot gm! '' MI auji pm NMI lir:CulIII1.7.111- rill, -1 — Ill ma- 1.11111 1-'471 C ' III i i ;, r ;, I .I Fes' TYPICAL REAR ELEVATION TYPICAL FRONT ELEVATION MILBRANDT ARCHITECTS AS I. ROOFING TILE I I _ l I da LUM. SLIDING WINDOWS AND DOORS 1! skim, ER,- L 1 WI WI- CEDAR SIDING ei I Is '. 11 r B A A B DL____T jj-i_ ri-1-Jo t END ELEVATION BUILDING TYPE 2 ri_f----i_____, OS. .' 10' ..' 11: 2 r. a C,isi_= 11 in.1 al.1-111 1s .'1..12.. i Ink I" 0.-11 yt.. si zl 11.11;1 cam`-1 on t n y 11 i ios Mir_ _ i o F INN I - TINE TYPICAL REAR ELEVATION TYPICAL FRONT ELEVATION MILBRANDT ARCHITECTS I., I' MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS VICINITY MAP EtO A LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY DEVELOPMENT Tao\ L ll WAaEMOTON k Ta0"7 PROJECT SITE- Nl.f0Tty ST. G[NK COITION CCCIC CICC ^ `" \. , MACN PANT--ilL..'s( 11 ta0 1\' SEAiiIE a O aal ISO APP0OSJNATE EXTENT OF CLEARING IIIII L`4C la\ 1%t O wEaT oN\ 111... PLANT a aae o i AND GRADING ii '`OCC \V.. r' 1 r , T MINTON I I F 11 V I. ' PI 4 i . G \ / to E i y 1 v so E Y l• r ,^( T a r. 1 U _ . , mire moms,me 0 ' ss01. ‘ \ ,-. ifift)',. •...A vikt41 00,p. _!,:._,_,..<-.\ __ow" 3 0 i • 14.5reallik .08 1.. . :elYli .\ c` ; 3oli, yi(4.4., . 1. 'itiZt \ \ 06 00 i l ray411 i•iet: Nat naora alilAfR ma rn: 6 rlorulnua nr. A so 0471E An.Ili R.O.M. i n..f,.r L. lA LI COYN PROPERTY COMM' POSED SO ia' STORM Q SQN/TARYSDNER OOOaI eNO1N. T[Ma aINC. r rJ uE yr.Nn•.-w .il..17 r 1 1 ra.Off) •_ r1O O0TI 4/0/0 rr(/)iv/ MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS PROPOSED WATER IMPROVEMENTS E STING I WATERMAN INIASQ AVE LL .. I/N. i../ 40 L 0' F1 Iti I l/ I / f/ A' // ./ I LAKE WASHNGTON K(F.KM B Ey,15Tt 1,, ;. j PRDPOSEu tr WATERMAIN 7 _, I PROPOSED 18"WATERMAN MARNA LANDING APARTMENTS 1S"WATER TRANSMISSION PIPELINE AND PRESSURE RELEASE VALVE IIIM T+ur.w -.. __- o.. MT. .c.0 a ..u11M w. MT VW.. .T MOTS OTTO . aS o.m 0 rlN mNe.LocNNM Y El 41r1010 OirNILAMLInINCOWSLOC•e1q---- Ti INTERSTATE I-405 WEST RW 1 r----1 11 I I I0I 4 A . I.lt Zf— __.t.rl..vrta rra 0,.KW WAS/WI) Ei 3 E} 30II NW 1 1 I 1 4 ELn.IN J M OS.Y Ir ILL PV2 L- 1 I,AMA 1/1 fEADOWAVE Si. 1-- IN / 11 11 e 1 V. 14 33Ll—=---- --• C nNaM.ais .-., ,— --1 ltRi.YII.TI t iI Aw r J 0M10bg0 Lr1.n m AN 0IANMO,AIo.l.u wov x ^ L FI: EE,Ir'-Ewt-Mr[Nescnallos L IJLEerumorA.E N.NW 11.W.W. I— aJ IISliiii i g) rf ntlr k 1 j e•- J Y ACT.r W.WTrr r MOWtAtEMre1 . J MST.r n.W..aNll•M nwnnv un rrr.J WWI 3-ASANOOIN WAT•NNAM cA1A:I•.r IrdnA I.rr,,LT,NIO•I.{: NOrM•o it MNwNAMT MAPS uxwNT 1.M v142. iN re4w.w NO.N.c Nh.l0 udoiSt^ WM ILw VC<OW: Wr...1 rOOro•eD Ta Te owTNNC1ON 4•eMENT coxc..LocNNn MOWN•n Ir ILL PPS- lc; GENTS Or m CON iwNucnoN EASEwn rNoro•r le w rr. OWNMT WMEaSTIGN t w INTERSTATE I-40S R W r.orw la Irwrw u\ L _-___—-i-. ,---;_- - —_) I rRorweoa»NrOIUllr cawnwn1011auawNr m.nio•]•t amnnwlt-(awAtwsr .. { \ t NOT a STATIONING. M. P. CWNEn 1TSD•US•n.•••• If Ol Mt-- Ml yao la nNWMIR UTILITY ENE MI I ilyLe 16.'Lr,l'NWiL'1 I M Cl EI•Er101WYW / / / NIE a 30,CON{NOCTION WEWNr Will CONC.KOCNNO MAWTM ISM li INtWaFML•OI nA..Nr.RA1I.>•. j eCTaIL N.ue r urr 0.1 1 moray LP I ulinlwcrn NWIN:OW SLOGAN&Y Ir .rie a 0 ww rrni cow.cw y w T.r ucN I{ SAW WA NENroN nANPUYo ur.IL. I l T - ING Aa:.l•II NOT rPOONOI ply' I t t,.tEADOW AVE K i ON sri aNa:I0- 1 l aN No wt AT 1 Mava w Tr oa rra- , II Aw i777 J v n•Inac-(o o•oWr C Iwo -I lAi R N•ALlL3 y. ii E ) e y to 1 ntr/ 1., ,4 ,_ , r _ NIONOWO is PLANANANT NT11,1,TWONNT X i WTCHLWE SM.]IIIH.SW SHEET] MARINA LANDING APARTMENTS 16'WATER TRANSMISSION PIPELINE AND PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE i a WATER MAIN PLAN tl A.1.M t i0 STA.]„W ono WV , 1 E • N•17-L•0O • M•• Np 1 .nN1aN• n IL•M WTI a NNwoe L• N I...0 NINI L T e 4Ar II[ se 0 Ir o.me YA'f rr4 L c :'L,.n,4rroe. Nomme f MONw 1 w MI wet,. Am me Amos r EAcm Pm Mu.mixAmo Amy. a.,c,.ulo.w.1.MOW mom*.1 LP.r o.Ma h PO.,N WOMNCAMc...Aim NO Z.1`r oe. nA 1.Y,«LI PMor" trc,.tr uoo lYiLwl nA IxAW1R1 MINC 441! 0[ Y .R.W4GiIM a P\IQLice' M.o.Y V,r MONO Pnoraw w or ir of rM Qv YtIlla IIA t.N,«L1.PMVYY)l tint.itrtrCl.[ TerizOO.04 i•OuQ, P+++ILA*To... Y _./ p PMOMr r V Ir.a•MO-tr L M M DO1M:.R0miND M AA 1•'!'Dnie 00`4la.0I MINIM Rao. I `^)`)(/..p. J W ,' na..r«ll..wWIW KOO,t1 ilr nr nru.,V I.AAwI MAMA MOCMWO bMrYVlfO MO 1. L ki,,,,,„ , _ .„'tM A\IO PARKING tz ! I piois rx ALOa7....../1rrwouniw444It ukw,r ii Nc««IEMItIWI•MN 0 c Roc.Wo toillict!till1116 1\' 9 i ` U nMYrl..uar'COL Pw Ern PAvm rAnNalo wo\sa n v Y.n y,nlonu, MOL Aa tl rer M'AMOIW•.•A MMA MC.ROC.. fr/4 ylllA n njpA1M M Ja YR in MM.YVMVOl Ma IrYIf Ct IR IW IYA IC'OI ROCar / Y nA I•Yow.Ll{n••Mgyloo/ ryq«q MI V Or.r Ol MS to ciMIII coon MAMMA I. wo c•c.« T.PMOY 1;4 IR:14 *04 ITOirigM PM nAeerLYH _crfMn.oellro hssy.I\MIOrIOa YANDAp rx AaYYRr _ 4;D I a IL I NT,M IOLLQ rMO1q II V Or IT O1 PM-- _— T, MRIN VI moms M V OPw O11M •.. P.10Yp IU LP it OlIN Sr CI rt.Mr,MY Rosso 11 .Oa1M nA1.rut rW NIP=In V If to Mr roItonilec.aLoa.rlo iairouo ir,:ii=ir i8.Mir<.niailw Y wl ICM NCT.ODom LAMB moor. M••••a•. OM MOIIM PMoroa rc of PM n•ar° W`rclMOrAAMOLoMAMOKrureMARINALANDINGAPARTMENTS 1r WATER TRANSMISSION PIPELINE i euT r MATAAM.o AND PRESSURE RELEASE VALVE SCAM YAM PLAN8 AM I.•\ USTA.a•fa W.TO MARINA LANDING APAMTY[NTI Dan Irur0r•MIL r • APPAaru Io• IMYtNO. Mime. I L IIr1.M A,e Mas ANN .•SiJAM it ENDING OF FILE iLE TITLE