Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA85-057
BEGINNING OF FILE FILE ,.mi MICROFILM U off i AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTALAw3"ey De>Jc] e , being first duly sworn on oath states that DETERMINATION he/she is the Chief Clerk of the ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The ReviewVALLEYNEWSPAPERSERC) has issuedEnvironmentala declaration ofnnoitten significance for the following projects: Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY(ECF- Daily newspapers published six(6)times a week.That said newspapers 087-85) are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Application for site plan approval to allow a seven building complex currently used for months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published fabrication to convert large portions to in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King electronics laboratory and office spaces and an application for a conditional useCounty, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal permit to allow for an off-premise parking newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for lot totalling 980 spaces for cars and 2B spaces for motorcycles for the expandedKingCounty. use, files SA-056-85 and CU-057-95; located west of Lind Avenue between S.W. 3Thenoticeintheexactformattached, waspublished in the DailyNews CITY Street and S.W. 43rd Street. CCITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECRE- JournaL_, Daily Record Chronicle:_, Daily Globe News , (and ATION DEPARTMENT(pCo Application for site plan approvalval(S(SA-061- not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its 85) to allow construction of a proposed subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a children's playground in Jones Park and an application for shoreline substantial de- iotine of T',1rvtrnnmenti31 1letenni tin tlott was published velopment permit (SM-009-85) to allow equipment within 200'of the Cedar River; on Aue;us t 12, 1985 R1070 located east of Wells Ave. S. and south of the Cedar River. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing Department, 235-2550. M355l Building, Any appealRetoofgggpublicationistheWashington, Any of ERC action must be filed with the Renton sum of$ 2 _73 Hearing Examiner by August 25, 1985. Published in the Daily Record Chronicle August 12, 1985. R1070 i• Za6)FW- - Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1 th day of r:u r 19 8 CITY OF TO Notary Public for the State of Washington, f f i I N I VI residing at Federal Way,1.° King County, Washington. SEP : IN 1985VN#87 Revised 10i84 BUILDING/ZDG DEPT. at- O57- '6 Public Notice NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A public hearing will be held by the Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner at his egular meeting in the Council ChambersAudreyDeJoie , being first duly sworn on oath states that in the second floor of City Hall, Renton, he/she is the Chief Clerk of the Vashington on August 27, 1985, at 9:00 l.m. to consider the following petitions: ITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECRE- kTION DEPARTMENT VALLEY NEWSPAPERS Application for site plan approval to allow ie oonstruction of a proposed children's DailylaNews Journal, DailyRecord Chronicle, DailyGlobe News nd an and inJones for Park(filer eSub tan-nd aR application for a Shoreline Substan- al Development Permit(file SM-009-85); Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers roperty locateq.east of Wells Ave.S.and are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six outh of the Cedar River. lAY CREEK ASSOCIATES months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published Application rezone approximately 2.52 in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King cres of properly from R-2 to B-1 (file R- County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal onsiru ato allow the subjectldissi;e ct be onst ucted with office buildings; located newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for n the east side of Lake Washington Blvd. King County. E.at 4904 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. OEING AEROSPACE COMPANY Application for site plan approval (file The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News A-056=85)to allow a seven story building mplex currently used for fabrication to Journal_—, Daily Record Chronicle X , Daily Globe News (and Dnvert large portions to electronics bornotinsupplementform) which was regularly distributed to its licatiry andr office spaces and an PP g Y plication for a conditional use permit(file ubscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a U-057-85) to allow for an off-premise Irking lot totalling 980 spaces for cars andNoticeofPublicHearingwaspublished3spacesformotorcyclesfortheexpand- on Aubust 16, 1985 R1074 i use; located west of Lind Avenue tween S.W. 39th Street and S.W. 43rd reet: Legal descriptions of the files noted love are on file in the Renton Building and The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 35.64 Zoning Department. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the public hearing on August 27,1985,at 9:00 a.m.to express their opinions. Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director Published in the Daily Record Chronicle Aug. 16, 1985. R1074 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 21 s t day of Au8 1985 y w • Notary Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VN#87 Revised 10/84 2 /n7a 3F R4,4 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 44 d; :Olt RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR z owl .,} 0 - MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co- 09 T60 SEP1'. BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR June 27, 1986 Mr. K. L. Walker Boeing Electronics Company A Division of the Boeing Company Mail Stop 9A-63 P.O. Box 3707 Seattle, Washington 98124-2207 RE: Schedule of Installation of Traffic Mitigation/BECO PROJECT-Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39 th Street. Dear Mr. Walker: The I Environmental Review Committee reviewed your letter of June 18. 1986 at their regular meeting and accepted the modified dates for the installation of the traffic signal at S.W. 41st Street and Lind Avenue S.W. and the construction of Raymond Avenue S.W. north of S.W. 41st Street. The Building Division has been informed of the changes in the time schedule. Thank you for suppling the necessary information. For the Environmental Review Committee. c>FcclRogerJ. Blaylock Zoning Administrator 1181N RJB cc. Jim Hanson, Assistant Building Official 11) BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY A Division of The Boeing Company M/S 9A--63 P.O.Box 3707 Seattle,Washington 98124-2207 June 18 , 1986 9-4140-KLW-091 City of Renton Attention : Mr . Hansen Building and Zoning Department Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton , WA 98055 Dear Mr . Hansen : As requested , I am enclosing a copy of our contract with Totem Electric for the 41st Street and Lind Avenue traffic signal and the contract with R. W. Scott for the extension of Raymond Avenue . The anticipated completion schedule for the traffic signal is approximately July 15 , 1986 . The poles are scheduled to be shipped the first week of July , and the contractor will complete the installation as soon as the poles arrive . The contractor estimates that , if he does not encounter any delays due to weather , the Raymond Street extension will be complete by July 3 , 1986 . The above dates are approximate and depend on deliveries and weather . We are following these contracts closely to assure completion as soon as possible . If you have further questions , you can reach me on 575-5611 . Sincerely , Boeing Electronics Company r: tit K . L . Walker KLW :bg Enclosure ri. oyNf". rj! JUN1819 86 ul CONTRACT NO. BECo (FAC) 86-1 FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL SW 41st STREET and LIND AVENUE RENTON, WASHINGTON THIS CONTRACT made this /p > day of c24,v 1986", by and between BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY, a division of The Boeing Company, a Delaware Corporation with offices at 625 Andover Park West, Tukwila, Washington, 98188 (hereinafter referred to as Boeing") and dre• Ted---.. c(hereinafter referred to as Contractor") . WITNESSETH WHEREAS , Boeing desires the accomplishment of the work called for herein and, WHEREAS , Contractor represents that he has the experience and ability to perform such work, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the agreements contained herein Boeing and contractor hereby agree as follows: Clause 1 . Contract Documents The following documents are by this reference made a part of this contract and these documents, together with this contract, constitute the entire contract and are hereinafter referred to collectively as the "contract" or the "contract documents" : a. The "Special Conditions" , attached hereto. b. "The Boeing Company General Conditions for Construction and Similar Work, Fixed Price (Rev. 6-71) " , attached hereto. c. Annex to "Boeing Company General Conditions for Construction and Similar Work, Fixed Price (Rev. 8-68) " , dated 4-76, attached hereto. d. Revision No. 1 to General Conditions for Construction and Similar Work (11-80) , attached hereto. e. City of Renton Design Standards - Traffic Signals . f. SW 41st Street and Lind Avenue Drawings dated 11-85 : Sheet 1 of 3 Cover Sheet CRTy cm, _F. Sheet 2 of 3 Plan Sheet t` A:' fc' `ire,Sheet 3 of 3 Wiring SchematicLiu 7 = jS• n 10/FPC8 61 Page 1 JUN 18 1986 ,I) u1y NG D fPT. S S Clause 2 . Statement of Work Contractor agrees to furnish all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, incidentals and supervision necessary to complete a traffic signal at SW 41st Street and, Lind Avenue per the drawings and specifications. Clause 3 . Contract Price Boeing agrees to pay the contractor at the time and in the mannEr provided in this contract in the amount not to exceed the lump sum of: cre The amount set forth above includes all applicable federal, state and local taxes, except Washington State sales tax. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this contract to be executed by their respective duly authorized representatives, the day and year first above written. BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY o7e-.7, Cl<os t.6 V G A Division of The Boeing Company) Contractor) By B J. A. OHNSON Title Direct r of Facilities Title V- -.zer. Date / / c! er6 Date cJ.f re ,7 e 6 BOEING ACCOUNTING DATA t10/FPC861 Page 2 11) CONTRACT NO. BECo(FAC) 811/0 FOR RAYMOND AVENUE SOUTHWEST EXTENSION BOEING ELECTRONICS CENTER RENTON, WASHINGTON THIS CONTRACT made this Q day of 1986 , by and between BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY, a diva ion of The oeing Company, a Delaware Corporation with offices at 625 Andover Park Wes Tukw4la, Wae hing,to 98188 hereinafter referred to as "Boeing") and , LT)1-)ST, hereinafter referred to as "Contractor") . WITNESSETH WHEREAS, Boeing desires the accomplishment of the work called for herein and, WHEREAS, Contractor represents that he has the experience and ability to perform such work, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the agreements contained herein Boeing and Contractor hereby agree as follows: fla»,P 1 - Contract Documents The following documents are by this reference made a part of this contract and these documents , together with this contract, constitute the entire contract and are hereinafter referred to collectively as the "contract" or the contract documents": a. The General and Unique Requirements , attached hereto. b. "The Boeing Company General Conditions for Construction and Similar Work, Fixed Price (Rev. 6-71)", attached hereto. c. Annex to "Boeing Company General Conditions for Construction and Similar Work, Fixed Price (Rev. 8-68)", dated 4-76, attached hereto. d. Revision No. 1 to General Conditions for Construction and Similar Work (11-80) , attached hereto. e. Raymond Avenue Southwest Extension Boeing Electronics Center and specifications. f'1:nnaa 2. Statement of Work Contractor agrees to furnish all labor, materials, equipment, supplies , incidentals and supervision necessary to comiWIfhteRaymond Avenue Southwest Extension at the Boeing Electronics Cegi&ek4r`t+ `10ti, gs and specifications.4 ;ry i! L 1986 11 2BG/FPC-86-20 1 fla,ise 3$ Contract Price Boeing agrees to pay the Contractor at the time and in the manner provided in this contract in the amount not o exceed the lump sum of: E//T- 7?tie deii,V, ,(A S'i i 1 i>it c 'ro X f tA-, r-s ED cyil 27"/2,?/c fS The amount set forth above includes all applicable federal, state and local taxes , except Washington State sales tax. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this contract to be executed by their respective duly authorized representatives , the day and year first above written. BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY 1it/ \./ e'r/( 6/rA7,-Co A Division of The Boeing Company) Contractor) y A. JONS N Title T)i rertor of Facilities Title Director of Engineerine an d Construction Date S r Date 9. 4 2BG/FPC-86-20 2 OF R4,4 o THE CITY OF RENTON C , , Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 aka o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, 090 CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2501 O94), 4SEPE O P April 21, 1986 Boeing Electronics Company Attention: John A. Johnson M/S 9A-63 P.O. Box 3707 Seattle, Washington 98124-2207 RE: Conditional Use CU-057-85-Boeing-39th & Lind Ave. S.W. - Declaration of Restrictive Covenants Dear Mr. Johnson: Enclosed is a copy of your Declaration of Restrictive Covenants recorded under King County Auditor's number 8510110737. If we can be of further assistance in this matter, please feel free to call. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON CG-iLG- >,O OIGlCt9-gam Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk cc: Hearing Examiner Building & Zoning Enclosure MEM/gn RED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF CU 057-85 & SA 056-85 OFFICE OF THE CRY I'M DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS 1 :. 1 i 40737 F. RE TON MUNICIPAL LLBG. MILL AVE.SO. F MA WA 9S155 i-:ti_L rt: :4: `::. 00 SS WHEREAS, the BOEING CORPORATION is the Lessor of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as Exhibit 'A' attached heret3. r WHEREAS, the Lessors of said described property desire to impose the following co Crestrictive covenants as part of a Site Plan approval granted by the City of Renton as to use, prese it and future, of the above described real property. n NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid applicants hereby establish, grant and impose 00 restrictions and covenants hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their Successors, heirs, and assigns as follows: PARKING ARRANGEMENT 1 The existing use on subject property shall be terminated should the present p irking arrangement cease and adequate replacement parking not be provided. DURATION T iese covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further do Icumentation. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. r HP J JOHNSON, FOR BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANYY) N C C If) CO STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. Couni y of KING On this 9 day of October 1985, before me personally appeared the person(s) who execs.ted the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and vi)luntary act and deed of said person(s) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and yi:ar first above written. Notary Public in an f State of Was ton, residing at Seattle EXHIBIT "A" Cr) Legal iescription of property (If more space is required, attach a separate sheet). CD PARCEL A: That portion of Government Lot 31 , Section 36, Township 23 North, lODl Range 4 East, King County, Washington, lying west of the westerly,margin of Lind Avenue and north of the north line, of S.W. 43rd Street, EXCEPTING THEREFROM City of Renton road right-of-ways. PARCE_ B: That portion of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 36 , Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , King County, Washington, lying north of the north margin of S.W. 43rd Street and east of the east margin of Longacres Parkway, less City of Renton road- right-of-way. PARCEL C: Lots 4 , 5 , and 6 of the Plat of Burlington Northern Industrial Park Rentoi II as filed for record in Volume lll , page 44 of Plats , Records of King :ounty, Washington. J r1 Trammell Crow mpany 5601 Sixth Avenue South September 20, 1985 PO. Box 80326 Seattle, Washington 98108 206/762-4750 City of Renton City Hall Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 r Attention: Mr. James Hanson ol C Re:Boeing Aerospace Company File No. SA-056-05AM CU-51-85 , C Dear Sirs: lf) 00 As requested in your recent discussions with Mr. John Johnson of Boeing Electronics Company, we are writing to confirm our mutual understand- ings regarding the issuance of a conditional use permit under the above-referenced applications. Specifically, the Hearing Examiner required a covenant to the effect that, if for any reason Boeing' s leased parking facilities were no longer available to Boeing for parking, the permitted use in the Trammell Crow facilities would cease, and the property would be restored to a use consistent with applicable parking requirements of the City. This letter confirms that Trammell Crow Company acknowledges the requirements and conditions of the Hearing Examiner and will enforce and comply with the conditions in the event the City requests. By its joinder in this letter, Boeing also acknowledges that upon the City's request, the existing use wil be terminated if the leased parking arrangement terminates without adequate parking. Sincerely, PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP A, by/Apammel C iw Co ,s . ktr mal w1 r .si Bruce E. fsford tti ig Partner BEH/JB/bmy gUtLgING/ZONVNG D 'i Agreed: BOEING EL k0 CS COMPANY By: jam 4<-L% 2h 1 Date: _„c1John irector of Facilities cc,pi, ersatG1of R4, It A4 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON, WASHINGTON V `'z POST OFFICE BOX 828 100 S 2nd STREET S RENTON, WASHINGTON 98067 255-8678 o o ' 0 LAWRENCE J. WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 0, 9 0 P DAVID M. DEAN,ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY qTF p SEPTUM MARK E. BARBER, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY ZANETTA L. FONTES, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY October 11, 1985 MARTHA A. FRENCH,ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: Boeing Company - Suggested Covenant Language Dear Fred: The suggested covenant language is acceptable in legal form. However, the restrictive covenant is not valid until signed by all record owners of the property. With letters recently received from the Boeing Companyandthemajorowneroftheproperty, and because of their participation in the conditional use process, it is my belief that they would be estopped from denying the language in the restrictive covenant or the requirements in the permit. However, should they sell the property then the restrictive covenants would not be binding on the new owner unless they had notice. Therefore, it would be appropriate to record the letters that we have received from the Boeing Company and Trammell Crow as attachments to a declaration that they are binding on property with a certain legal description. Thereafter, when the restrictive covenants have been fully signed, then we can also file that document and be doubly protected. The decision as to whether or not the recorded letters and a recorded restrictive covenant with only the major property owner' s signature on it is enough to protect the City, is one that will have to be made by the Building and Zoning Department and your office. There should be extraordinary circumstances to make that decision as it should not be common policy of the City to allow occupancy until all of the conditions of the permit have been met. lief Lawrence arrenC_117 LJW:nd cc: Mayor V BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY A Division of The Boeing Company M/S 9A-63 P.O.Box 3707 Seattle,Washington 98124-2207 October 9, 1985 9-4100-DWH-582 CITY OF RENTON Fred J. Kaufman, Land Use Hearing Examiner Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Reference: Restrictive Covenants, CU-057-85 Dear Mr. Kaufman: I am writing in response to your memo dated October 9, 1985, pertaining to the referenced covenants. Please find attached the signed and notarized document to be recorded with King County. Sincerely, BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY o birector of acilities Attachment t/ BOE/AW BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY A Division of The Boeing Company P.O.Box 3999 Seattle,Washington 98124-2499 October 7, 1985 2-4193-1000-066 RECEIVED Mr. Fred J. Kaufman OCT 0 91985 Heaing Examiner CITY OF RENTON The City of Renton HEARING EXAMINERMunicipalBuilding 200 Mill Avenue So. Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Kaufman: Subject: Restrictive Covenants - CU-057-85 Reference: Letter dated October 4, 1985 F. J. Kaufman to B. D. Zimmerman The Restrictive Covenants document for the parking at 39th and Lind Avenue S. W. will be signed by John Johnson, Director of Facilities, Boeing Electronics Company. His mailing address is as follows: John Johnson M/S 9A-63 Boeing Electronics Company P. O. Box 3707 Seattle, Washington 98124-2207 Sincerely, BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY 7)/' --, _ B; . Zi merman Costru tion Management BOE/AW AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of King DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 6th day of September 1985, affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. l616/2. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this /7f day of SE"10TEMf? E 1985. Notary ublic in and for the State of Washington, residing at rjet4 -c7&) therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: SA-056-85 and CU-057-85 - BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) I 1 r ,, 1081E September 6, 1985 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CI f Y OF REN I ON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY FILE NO. SA-056-85 and CU-057-85 LOCATION: West of Lind Avenue between S.W. 39th Street and S.W. 43rd Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval of Site Plan to permit a seven building complex to be converted to an electronics laboratory and office spaces and a conditional use permit to allow off-premise parking for 980 cars and 28 motorcycles. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approve both requests with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Site Approval and Conditional Use requests are approved with signing of covenants and conditions. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on August 20, 1985. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on August 27, 1985, at 9:45 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and other documents relevant to this application. Exhibit #2 - Site Plan. Exhibit #3 - Drawing showing western 1/2 of the proposed parking lot for Conditional Use request. Exhibit $4 - Drawing showing eastern 1/2 of the proposed parking lot for Conditional Use request. Exhibit #5 - Section of Plat for Burlington Northern Industrial Park II The hearing was opened with Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator introducing the above exhibits and presenting a review of the staff report with information as follows. The project is two phases and is a conversion of 7 buildings. 'The buildings on the north side between 41st street and the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks will be converted to office uses while the buildings on the south side will be a storage and manufacturing operation. Presently this is a warehouse function with a small amount of office space. Boeing has leased property to the north of the railroad tracks and is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow for 980 parking spaces to be placed on 9.6 acres. With this brief introduction, Richard Houghton, Public Works Director requested to testify before the completion of the report review so he could attend a previously scheduled meeting. Mr. Houghton mentioned several matters that had come to his attention on the project such as the timing of street improvements. The applicant has agreed to install the traffic signal at S.W. 41st Street and Lind Avenue S.W. and he feels the timing of that installation is not necessarily going to be required prior to the opening of the Boeing offices. The lead time necessary to design and order the parts for construction of that signal will probably take longer than it will take the applicant to complete his building conversions. i I I i BOEING AEROSPACE CO. .. .\NY SA--056-85 & CU-057-85 September 6, 1985 Page 2 Other accesses into and from the site are available with Lind Avenue being the main access. The intersection now is stop sign controlled. Continuing, Mr. Houghton spoke to the extension of Raymond Avenue with the south section to be constructed down to 41st Street. If a traffic signal is required later at 39th Street, the City will approach Boeing and ask for their participation. Continuing, Richard Houghton advised that since written staff comments were presented there has been a request for a buffer along Springbrook Creek in the form of a 30 ft. setback. He pointed out the Creek has a 40 ft. right-of-way along with a greenbelt on both sides of an additional 40 ft., making the greenbelt approximately 120 ft. across. The additional 10 ft. being required from Boeing's side would negate about 60 parking stalls that could otherwise have been constructed in that area. Replying to a question from Roger Blaylock as to the scheduling for the project including a date certain for the construction of the intersection of Raymond Avenue, Mr. Houghton stated Public Works Department would like to see this completed no later than 6 months after the complex is opened, hopefully beginning construction after the foul weather has past. At this point Mr. Blaylock continued reviewing the Site Plan to show how the entire site functions together. 99% of the offices are located between 41st Street and the railroad tracks. The Conditional Use Permit is requested to provide support parking for the offices. Landscaping, buffering, pedestrian and vehicle circulation was reviewed and discussion continued with the 4 criteria to be considered. The extension of Raymond Avenue from its present deadend will eliminate 60 parking spaces necessitating the redesign of that portion of the project. He continued reiterating the necessity for a controlled intersection at 39th Street because if there is no access at that point, 70% of the traffic will be forced to use an uncontrolled intersection. The 3 railroad crossings on 41st Street will have to either be sanctioned by the Washington State Utilities and Transportation Committee, or be removed. The Conditional Use Permit is for additional parking, and it was pointed out the lot will cross a railroad right-of-way with pedestrian and vehicle access crossing that right-of-way also. There are 1248 parking spaces required for the offices and laboratory. There are currently 460 parking spaces located around the offices, and if the additional landscape easement is required along the Springbrook Creek another 60 spaces would be lost. The applicant is still providing more parking than required for the project. The Fire Department expressed concern regarding the turn-around space provided on the western parking lot due to its angle, and to correct the situation would necessitate the elimination of approximately 10 parking spaces and redesign of that portion of the lot. Design Engineering Department has recommended a detailed drainage plan for 10 year frequency detention and a temporary erosion control plan for grading permit. Mr. Blaylock advised the applicant is leasing the parking area and staff feels restrictive covenants should be required to ensure if the lease is cancelled the buildings will have to be vacated. In conclusion, the Zoning Administrator stated both requests seem appropriate and recommended approval of both requests with the signing of restrictive covenants and conditions as set out in the staff report. The Hearing Examiner called for testimony from the applicant or their representative. Responding for Boeing Aerospace Company was: Bob Scholes, President ESM Engineering, Inc. 451 S.W. 10th Street, Suite 106 Renton, Wa. 98055 Mr. Scholes advised the Examiner he was in agreement with most of the report, but wanted to address some areas of concern. He advised the applicant has a problem with the street improvements on Raymond Avenue. They do not object to the improvements on Raymond Avenue or the signal at 41st Street and Lind, and that there should be a time schedule for those improvements. Redesign, funding and weather will definitely influence the completion of these matters. The applicant requested they be permitted to use the parking lot and open access through Raymond Avenue, on a temporary basis, using the existing improvements. They propose to have the necessary improvements completed by the end of the third quarter of 1986, or before the summer of 1986. He advised the buildings are currently occupied and are in the process of being converted. The office west of Raymond and north of 41st Street will be the first conversion, the office east will be converted next Spring, and the timing of the improvements and conversions are going hand-in-hand. They must make application for improvements to the railroad crossing as the Public Works Department is requesting they use rubberized crossings. Again, he reiterated their agreement to complete all of this work, but would require sufficient time. Y 1 t i AIJ 91 1 i BOEING AEROSPACE CC. .. .\NY SA-056-85 & CU-057-85 September 6, 1985 Page 3 Mr. Scholes continued with comments on the proposed required buffering making reference to the 120 ft. greenbelt along Springbrook Creek right-of-way. The applicant feels they should only be required to provide an additional 10 ft. setback. He stated they already have 120 ft. right-of-way for Springbrook Creek, a 40 ft. animal habitat and buffer for pedestrian access, they are adding an additional 10 ft. on to that, 20% landscaping, and do not feel they should be required to provide an additional 30 ft. for landscaping that will eliminate 60 parking spaces. In closing, Mr. Scholes reviewed the staff recommendations for approval questioning the necessity of a covenant to tie the Benaroya and Glacier Park properties together; and acknowledged agreement to the six recommended Site Approval conditions. Testifying further in support of the application was: John Johnson Director of Facilities Boeing Electronics Company P. O. Box 3707 Seattle, Washington, 98124 Mr. Johnson wanted to address the topic of parking at the Boeing complex. He felt there should be some cushion in the amount of parking spaces because if there is inadequate parking, people will tend to park illegally. They encourage the use of carpools and have van programs but people still seem to want to drive their own car. The average figure to be used to calculate parking spaces needed is 1.2 persons per car. He spoke to the suggested covenant arrangement stating they have a lease with Burlington Northern Railroad for the lease of the property to be used for parking for a period of approximately 5 years. Mr. Johnson thanked City staff for their support in proceeding with this application and reiterated Boeing's desire to work closely with the City to fulfill the conditions of approval. There was no one in attendance to oppose this application. Calling for closing comments from staff, Roger Blaylock requested if modifications are needed to provide additional crossings or pathways for pedestians that these modifications be permitted to proceed without having to again come before the Hearing Examiner for review. Concluding his comments, Mr. Blaylock read from the Code referencing leased parking facilities. There were no further questions from the applicant or comments by staff. The hearing closed at 10:55 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1.The applicant, Boeing Aerospace Company, has requested approval of a Site Plan for a seven (7) building complex conversion for office and laboratory uses, together with a Conditional Use Permit to allow an off- premise parking area. 2.The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents was entered in the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971, as amended), a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5. There was no opposition to the subject proposal from any member of the public. 6. The subject site is located generally west of Lind Avenue S.W. between S.W. 39th Street and S.W. 43rd Street. 7.The site is a mix of developed and undeveloped properties. The developed properties were used primarily for warehousing uses. The conversion will be primarily to office space which requires additional parking that cannot be accommodated around the existing complex of buildings. i J; d i BOEING AEROSPACE CC ANY SA-056-85 & CU-057-85 September 6, 1985 Page 4 8.The subject site was annexed into the City by the adoption of Ordinance 1745 in April, 1959, as amended by Ordinances 1764 and 1928 adopted in May, 1959 and December, 1961 respectively. The site was automatically zoned G-1 (General; Single Family Residential; Minimum lot size - 35,000 sq ft) upon annexation. The site was reclassified in a number of actions to M-P (Manufacturing Park), its current classification. The ordinances changing the zoning were Ordinances 2533 and 3012 adopted in December, 1969 and March, 1976, respectively. 9. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 10. The proposed parking lots would be located immediately south of S.W. 39th Street and north of the railroad right-of-way. The parking lots would serve a proposed 980 cars and an additional 28 motorcycles. The total acreage covered by the proposed parking lots would be approximately 9.6. The parking lots are within 500 ft. of the office complex. 11. The Site Plan encompasses 78 acres including the 9.6 acres in the proposed parking lots. Approximately 2 acres of the parking area will be landscaped. The entire periphery of the parking lots will be landscaped and screened from the roadway and the adjoining railroad line. Interior landscaped islands will also be provided. 12. The parking lots are north of the buildings they are intended to serve and separated from them by the rail line. The rail line will prevent free access by pedestrians to the buildings, but pedestian corridors have been provided along Raymond Ave S.W. 13. The applicant has indicated that Raymond will be opened through the southerly portion of the subject site, that is, that portion of the site between the rail line and S.W. 41st Street which contains the office buildings. 14. The applicant requires parking, under the City regulations, for 2,053 vehicles. The applicant proposes providing 2,542 stalls. This represents approximately 25% more stalls then are required. 1,008 stalls will be provided on northerly property owned by Glacier Park Company while the remaining stalls numbering 1,534 will surround the existing complex of buildings owned by a separate party. The off-premise parking in the separate ownership requires a Conditional Use Permit. 15. The existing complex was built under a Site Approval granted in 1978. The seven building complex is located between S.W. 43rd and the rail line. 16. Traffic analysis indicated the need for a traffic signal at S.W. 41st and Lind which the applicant agreed to install. The timing of installation is dependent upon acquisition by the Public Works Department. The Level of Service (LOS) for the intersection of S.W. 39th and Lind, even with the construction of Raymond south to 41st, is projected to approach LOS E, which approaches an unstable situation with a constant backup at the intersection. Staff recommended covenants requiring participation in an additional traffic signal for this interesection when additional buildings are constructed north of 39th and after additional study. 17. The traffic analysis was based upon City counts conducted in 1983 and recent studies conducted during July, 1985. The July studies were conducted on July 2 and July 9. This Office must simply observe that those dates would appear to coincide with July 4th vacation schedules and may not be representative dates regarding traffic volumes. 18. Modifications to buildings will be interior design work. The existing structures will not be modified to any significant extent in outward appearance. The conversion will be phased in over the next year, to be completed in about the third quarter of 1986. 19. Springbrook Creek lies just west of the subject site and staff initially recommended an additional landscape buffer between the parking area and the creek. That recommendation was modified by staff during the hearing. 20. Staff recommended that access to S.W. 43rd from the site be limited to emergency purposes to protect the arterial functions of that street. They also indicated that the landscaping along that street was poorly maintained. i s 1 i BOEING AEROSPACE CO. .. . ANY SA-056-85 & CU-057-85 September 6, 1985 Page 5 21. Various rail spurs cross the subject site. These are subject to sanctioning by the Washington State Utilities and Transportation Committee. Staff recommends that the applicant finalize the status of these lines. CONCLUSIONS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1. The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, will not impair the public health, safety and welfare and in addition, is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-748(C) which provides in part that: a. The proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan; b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location; c. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property; d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; e. Parking will not occur in required side yards and that traffic movement and circulation will be safe; f. Noise, light and glare will not be adverse; g. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use; h. Adequate public services are available and will not be burdened by the proposal. The requested conditional use appears justified, although 7 acres of parking, of which half is not required by the Code, results in a rather large expanse of parking even when broken up with landscaping. 2. The proposed parking lot generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan in that it serves office and manufacturing uses suggested by the Comprehensive Plan. 3. While a parking lot serving as an accessory use is not particularly intended to meet a community need, the principal use itself will presumably create additional job opportunities. 4. The well landscaped parking area will not adversely affect adjacent property, although there will obviously be traffic impacts which could have a spillover affect upon adjacent properties. 5. The parking lot is not located near any residential uses, so any impacts are minimal. 6. The installation of the traffic signal at Lind and 41st, and the participation in additional traffic control at Lind and 39th should assist traffic circulation in the area. The opening of Raymond will also help traffic circulation and should therefore, be accomplished in an expeditious fashion. Similarly, the traffic signal installation at Lind and 41st should be done as soon as possible. The traffic analysis indicates that the signal is necessary at this time and delays should be kept to a minimum. Similarly, the participation in the Lind and 39th signal should not necessarily await additional construction and building activity but rather, should be predicated upon need. Therefore, the applicant will have to install that signal, as part of a Latecomers Agreement, if necessary, if the Traffic Engineering Division in its discretion indicates one is necessary. This should be the case even without any additional development based upon either accident data, or an LOS which deteriorates significantly. 7. The parking area should not contribute significantly to the noise, light or glare in the area. 8. The approximately 2 acres of landscaping appears sufficient to break up the expanse of parking, although as indicated, approximately 50% of the parking is excess capacity resulting in a rather large expanse of parking. 9. The parking area will not burden public services in the area, with the exception of roads, discussed elsewhere. I I i 1 1 BOEING AEROSPACE COI-.. . ,NY SA-056-85 & CU-057-85 September 6, 1985 Page 6 10. The setbacks already offered by Springbrook Creek do not appear to warrant additional landscaping at this time. The parking area will contain approximately 2 acres of landscaping which should be used to complement the creek alignment. 11. The issue of the permanency of the lease raises concerns by staff which are supported by the language of the Parking and Loading Ordinance. Section 4-2202 requires an arrangement which provides for a lease or other means to assure that a building will have the required parking for the life of the building. The five year lease held by the applicant does not appear to satisfy that condition. It would appear that covenants requiring the termination of the use are required. SITE PLAN 12. The proposed conversion appears to conform to the designation of the area for manufacturing park/office park uses, although it appears that the conversion of the existing complex will place a strain on traffic in the area. The installation of traffic signals and the opening of Raymond will apparently relieve some of the impacts. 13. the existing complex will not significantly modify the appearance of the area and will be as compatible with the area as it was previously. Staff has recommended that all but emergency access to S.W. 43rd be curtailed because of the necessary arterial functions of that street. 14. Again, pedestrian circulation to and from the parking areas appears reasonable in light of the intervening railroad line. 15. Landscaping along the periphery of the building complex could be improved, especially in the area of maintenance. DECISION The Conditional Use Permit and Site plan are approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The installation of a full traffic signal at the intersection of S.W. 41st Street and Lind Avenue S.W. no later than the first occupancy, and subject to reasonable ordering and installation delays. 2. The installation of a full traffic signal at the intersection of S.W 39th Street and Lind Avenue S.W., subject to a Latecomers Agreement, if necessary, at such time as the Traffic Engineering Division indicates such a signal is necessary for the health, safety and welfare of the general public. The applicant will otherwise participate in a pro rata cost at the time such signal is warranted by other development along S.W. 39th adjacent to the proposed parking area. 3.The opening and full construction of Raymond Avenue S.W. extended south of its current terminus to a complete intersection with S.W. 41st Street. Such installation will be completed not later than July 31, 1986 and should be completed prior to that extreme limit if possible. 4. Access, save for emergency access to S.W. 43rd Street, should be prohibited. 5. Restoration and maintenance of landscaping throughout the entire complex is required. 6. Sanctioning by the Washington State Utilities and Transportation Committee of the rail spurs which cross the subject site. 7. The execution of Restrictive Covenants requiring the termination of the existing use if the parking arrangement terminates without adequate replacement parking. ORDERED THIS 6th day of August, 1985. FRED J. KAU AN HEARING EXAMINER i a BOEING AEROSPACE CC.-.. ANY SA-056-85 & CU-057-85 September 6, 1985 Page 7 TRANSMITTED THIS 6th day of August, 1985 to the parties of record: Bob Scholes, President ESM Engineering, Inc. 451 S.W. 10th Street, Suite 106 Renton, Wa. 98055 John Johnson Director of Facilities Boeing Electronics Company P. O. Box 3707 Seattle, Wa. 98124 TRANSMITTED THIS 6th day of August, 1985 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Jim Matthew, Fire Marshal Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before September 20, 1985. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. I r 1 1 i J l 1 , j%. ..: w'— i ,? i Ill I 1 111 1• •1 III 1 .11! UIlIII. _, M 1y .:' • (• ..t 4•::„( f;` s% s,/ ,ii17.:- __—_rrl I 1 11 _ • =l,OTj;;fJ,W Tip— --- - :111. . I1111_6i 1 I:IIII V _O. — 1 r , • ir0 - c. '••,, A` , ,17t illllllllllll.1 I;' 1:11111 /- • _(it?.f 1,61„„_ I •., u! 1t 1=A +. 7i V ,_`III 11 11. U?iri Illr'1111111111 - ^ri11i c1 fif'-'111 -i 3 fr•:.rl r rnlrl rrr!rl•i•t rrnrrr ru111111 . !I ffiltri9-777T:", •r"`-•T+";i'.•i-7i}*7r7*r rrr lit 1I mei; j r + OFFICE OFFICEU18OFf10E96Kvd15Ki21KIlK d OFFICE 33. 5K 1414r— li 7 181 5lig." o oT ` 1.7 1 ® Q ®1 J r181 s M, cfli 4111 STOUP ! 1 0 3 G L J V i U J J t LAB 50K r at• FAB 1 145.3K STRG STRG 53K il 16.7K J 165K STRG 98K STRG STRG STRG a j 82K FAB 2K OFFICE a U t v FABEo337. 4K 70K r Si L c=j'1 81.1 7.81.2 7.81.3 r._____r--1 r) r_________4.--1________n .r a. .. 4iLl •tShIT i 1 I i i Ki.) iili : r . . , . I S O St y 0 . f . S I IS _ I1 , 1 IiI' s.. .1 4 0 5 7 ILL1 • 111 II I i, Trfi S. 4'. ( 34TH STREET l ji---- 1.__ d1 M—P i 2) k 11 ' 1,, : /61 1 4.7'hi z 2h S w 1b'h S1 6rif- 1 1 4° 1 i i':// A0.7 A 'if A/ 3 , !' 1--- I! 5 4 I i 7 6 ~ 1 i M e 5 I l 2 3 l-1 I BOEINS AEROSPACE COMPANY SA-056-85, W-057-85 APPLICANT BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY TOTAL AREA - 78.0 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS LIND AVE S.W. AND S.W. 39TH STREET EXISTING ZONING M-P, MANUFACTURING PARK EXISTING USE PARKING LOT SITE UNDEVELOPED; REST OF SITE DEVELOPED PROPOSED USE OFF-PREMISE PARKING AREA AND CONVERSION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS TO OFFICES AND ELECTRONICS LAB6'RATORY. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION AND MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION-OFFICE COMMENTS I i 9 II E7 E I i 0 1' R Erb, c.: Ci ® z 41 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z 1A O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0, 9gT D SEPIE O P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR RECEIVED MEMORANDUM Air 7 1985 CITY OF RENTON AugJst 7, 1985 HEARING EXAMINER TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Environmental Review Committe SUBJECT: Boeing Aerospace Company/ECF-087-85/SA-056-85/CU-057-85 - Recommended Conditions The Environmental Review Committee, under their substantive authority, [Section 4-21322(D)] recommends to the decision-maker, the Hearing Examiner, that the Site Plan Approval request to allow a seven-building complex currently used for fabrication to convert large portions to electronics, laboratories, and office space and an application for a C)nditional Use permit to allow for off-premise parking lots totally 980 spaces for cars and 28 spaces for motorcycles be issued subject to the following conditions: 1. Installation of a full traffic signal at the intersection of S.W. 41st and Lind Ave. S.W. The applicant has agreed in a letter dated July 30, 1985, to install the signal.) 2. Extension of Raymond Ave. S.W. from its present dead end south of S.W. 39th St. to S.W. 41st St. 3.The filing of restrictive covenants to proportionally contribute to the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of S.W. 39th St. and Lind Ave. S.W. at the time of development of either of the building lots located on the north side of S.W. 39th St. (The traffic evaluation completed anticipates, even with the extension of Raymond Ave. S.W., that the service level at the intersection of S.W. 39th St. and Lind Ave. S.W. will be a Level E at the time of construction of the parking lots. The intent is to require an updated traffic evaluation with the development of the properties on the north side of S.W. 39th St. and a proportionate sharing at that time for a signalization of said intersection.) 3 Merr o to the Hearing Examiner August 7, 1985 Page 2 4. The railroad crossings that presently exist on S.W. 41st St. shall be either removed or sanctioned by the Washington State Utilities and Transportation Committee UTC). Under Section 4-2822(D), the decision-maker must accept these conditions as binding upon his ultimate decision unless he identifies in writing a substantial error in fact or conclusion by the Environmental Review Committee. The decision-maker then has the option of asking the Environmental Review Committee for reconsideration or revising the recommended conditions. The applicant also has the ability to appeal these conditions directly to the Hearing Examiner under authorities granted in Section 4-2823(A)(1)(a) within 14 days of the date the DNS is final. Therefore, the appeal date would be Monday, August 26, 1985, at 5:00 p.m. The appeal would be submitted in a form prescribed by both the Environmental Ordinance of the City of Renton and the Hearing Examiner Ordinance, Section 4-3011(B). RJB:1864Z:wr r I 1 h i 18777 CITY OF RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 27, 1985 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.: COU\ICIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a proposed children's playground in Jones Park, file SA-061-85, and an application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, file SM--009-85; property located east of Wells Ave. S. and south of the Cedar River. MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES Application to rezone approximately 2.52 acres of property from R-2 to B-1, file R-051-85, to allow the subject site to be constructed with office buildings; located on the east side of Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. at 4904 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY Application for site plan approval, file SA-056-85, to allow a seven building complex currently used for fabrication to convert large portions to electronics laboratory and office spaces and an application for a conditional use permit, file CU-057-85, to allow for an off-premise parking lot totalling 980 spaces for cars and 28 spaces for motorcycles for the expanded use; located west of Lind Avenue between S.W. 39th Street and S.W. 43rd Street. i 1 I 1892Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 27, 1985 APPLICANT: BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY FILE NUMBER: SA-056-85, CU-057-85 A.SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant requests site plan approval to allow a seven building complex to be converted to an electronics laboratory and office spaces and a conditional use permit to allow off premise parking for 980 cars and 28 motorcycles. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: GLACIER PARK COMPANY 2. Applicant: BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY 3. Location: Vicinity Map Attached) Located west of Lind Avenue between S.W. 39th Street and S.W. 43rd Street. 4. Existing Zoning: M-P, Manufacturing Park 5. Existing Zoning in the Area: M-P, Manufacturing Park 6. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option and Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option - Office 7. Size of Property: 9.6 acres Conditional Use 78.0 acres Site Approval 8.Access:Lind Ave. S.W. and S.W. 39th Street 9. Land Use: The site for the parking lot is vacant and the rest of the subject proposal is developed. 10. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Undeveloped property. East: Office/Warehouse/Shopping Center South: Office/Warehouse Uses West: Warehouse/Undeveloped Property C.HISTORY/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Annexation 1745 April 4, 1959 Corrected 1764 May 19, 1959 Corrected 1928 Dec. 12, 1961 Rezone (G to M-P & H-1) R-560-69 2533 Dec. 22, 1969 3012 March 1, 1976 Preliminary Plat PP-086-77 Jan. 9, 1978 Final Plat FP-278-79 Res. March 26, 1979 2254 Special Permit SP-822-75 Oct. 13, 1976 Site Approval SA-150-78 May 9, 1978 Site Approval SA-216-78 Nov. 9, 1978 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: a. Water: The subject site is served by the following: A 16-inch water line is located along Lind Ave. S.W.; 12-inch water lines along S.W. 29th St., SW 41st St., and S.W. 43rd St; and 12 inch lines serve the site of the subject buildings. iI E PRELIMINARY REPORT HE HEARING EXAMINER BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY, SA-056-85/CU-057-85 AUGUST 27, 1985 PAGE 2 b. Sewer: A METRO sanitary sewer line is located along S.W. 43rd St. Eight inch City water lines are located on the lot with the buildings between S.W. 41st and S.W. 43rd St.) and along Lind Ave. S.W. between S.W. 39th St. and S.W. 43rd St. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water drains into the Springbrook drainage system for the parking lot site and into an existing storm drainage system. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: Not applicable. 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: Not applicable. b. Middle Schools: Not applicable. c. High Schools: Not applicable. 5. Recreation: Not applicable. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-730, Manufacturing Park (M-P). 2. Section 4-748, Conditional Use Permit. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Commercial Goal and Area Objective, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, January 1985, pp. 16-17. 2. Industrial Goal and Objectives, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, January 1985, pp. 18-19. 3. Green River Valley Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, January 1985, pp. 31-50. 4. Section 4-2204(3)A(4), Location of Parking Facilities. 5. Section 4-2204(3)A(5), Leased Parking. 6. Section 4-2204(3)C, Off-Street Parking 7. Section 4-744(F)2, Green River Valley/Landscaping G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, the Boeing Aerospace Company, is requesting both (1) a conditional use permit to provide required parking for an industrial complex to be within 500 feet of the main complex (Section 4-2204(3) Location of Parking Facilities) and (2) site plan approval for the entire complex because of a shift in use. 2. The Environmental Review Committee.(ERC) issued a Declaration of Non-Significance on August 7, 1985. The appeal period will expire on August 25, 1985. The ERC issued their decision based upon specific mitigation and conditions that the applicant has agreed to in the total development. The ERC to assure compliance issued a separate memoradum to the Hearing Examiner under their substantive authority (Section 4-2822(D)) requiring the following: 1. Installation of a full traffic signal at the intersection of S.W. 41st Street and Lind Avenue S.W. (The applicant has agreed to this in a letter dated July 30, 1985.) 2. Extension of Raymond Avenue S.W. from its present dead end south of S.W. 39th Street to S.W. 41st Street. 3. The filing of restrictive covenants to proportionally contribute to the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of S.W. 39th Street and Lind Avenue S.W. at the time of development of either of the building lots located on the north side of S.W. 39th Street i II i j PRELIMINARY REPORT HE HEARING EXAMINER BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY, SA-056-85/CU-057-85 AUGUST 27, 1985 PAGE 3 NOTE: The traffic evaluation completed anticipates, even with the extension of Raymond Avenue S.W., that the service level at the intersection of S.W. 39th Street and Lind Avenue S.W. will be at a Level E at the time of construction of the parking lots. The intent of the ERC is to require an updated traffic evaluation with the development of properties on the north side of S.W. 39th Street and a proportionate sharing at that time for signalization of said intersection. 4. The railroad crossings that presently exist on S.W. 41st Street sahll be either removed or sanctioned by the Washington State Utilities and Transportation Committee (UTC). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: 3. In the review of a conditional use permit the criteria as delineated under Section 4-748 must be applied. The following is an analysis of those criteria; A. Comprehensive Plan: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject site as Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option and Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option-Office. The total + 78 acre site will be one manufacturing operation. The 980 new parking space along with the 28 spaces for motorcycles support the manufacturing and office function of industrial plant. Associated parking is appropriate and necessary for the effective operation of the facility. B. Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. The new parking lots are necessary as a result in the change of use of the seven industrial/office buildings to the south. The concentration of office uses between S.W. 39th Street and the subject site creates a demand for adjacent parking. C. Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. The creation of a 980 stall parking lot will impact S.W. 39th Street and any future construction that occurs on the north side of the street. Therefore, the ERC specifically required that Boeing commit to the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of S.W. 39th Street and Lind Avenue S.W. at the time of development of any of the lots on the north side of S.W. 39th Street. It is more than likely that Boeing will eventually expand this facility and develop the lots to the north of the subject site. D. Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. This provision does not apply. This is solely an industrial/office area. E. Parking: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased to as much as seventy five (75%) of the lot coverage requirement of the zone in which the proposed use is located if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. This provision does not apply. F. Traffic: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in the surrounding area. The traffic and circulation problem was sufficient for the ERC to require specific mitigation. cI PRELIMINARY REPORT 'HE HEARING EXAMINER BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY, SA-056-85/CU-057-85 AUGUST 27, 1985 PAGE 4 Over 99 per cent of all of the offices proposed in the manufacturing complex are located on the north side of S.W. 41st Street. The proposed parking lots would provide the parking immediately adjacent to the need. However, the subject site is separated from the office buildings by railroad tracks. The ERC has required the construction of Raymond Avenue S.W. to improve both vehicular and pedestrian circulation. In addition the applicant has provided another pedestrian pathway at the western boundary of the parking lot. With the modification in use of the existing buildings located on the north side of S.W. 41st Street, a total of 1248 parking spaces would be necessary. Approximately 460 parking spaces are presently provided around these four buildings. The proposed parking lot will add another 980 spaces for a total of 1440 parking spaces; however, approximately 60 parking spaces will be elimated with the construction of Raymond Avenue S.W. Thus a total of approximately 1380 parking spaces will be provided and comply with the requirements of the parking and loading ordinance. G. Noise, Glare: Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. The subject site is utilized exclusively for a parking lot. Light, glare and noise will be limited to primarily 7 a.m. to 4 p.m. workday. No intrusion or problems are anticipated. H. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by buildings or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. Landscaping has been concentrated along the perimeter of the parking lots to soften and blend the intensity of the activity with future uses to the north of S.W. 39th Street. Interior landscaping has been provided to meet not only the intent and requirements of the parking and loading ordinance, but to separate main access and circulation patterns from the parking areas. It does not appear that additional landscaped areas are necessary. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are loctated. This criteria is not applicable. J. Conversion: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the provisions of this Chapter. This criteria is not applicable. K. Public Improvements: The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditioned upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities, utilities and/or services. The ERC has taken specific measures to assure that the traffic circulation system is not overburdened. The immediate improvement of the intersection of S.W. 41st Street and Lind Avenue S.W. with a traffic signal and the commitment for future installation of a signal at the intersection of S.W. 39th Street and Lind Avenue S.W. will assure adequate public service to the subject site. i J I 1 PRELIMINARY REPORT rHE HEARING EXAMINER BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY, SA-056-85/CU-057-85 AUGUST 27, 1985 PAGE 5 4. Various City departments have reviewed the subject proposal. The Parks and Recreation and Police Departments have approved the subject proposal. Fire Prevention, Traffic Engineering, Design Engineering, Policy Development, and Building and Zoning Departments recommend approval subject to certain conditions. The conditions of approval by the various departments are as follows: Fire: 1. Access to parking lot to be improved to provide adequate apparatus turn-around. 2. For purpose of defining the nature of electronic fabrication and manufacturing, applicant is required to submit information regarding the use of hazardous production materials. 3. Raymond Avenue S.W. was required to be installed as a condition of future development under original plat, between S.W. 39th and S.W. 41st Streets. Traffic Engineering: Raymond Avenue S.W. needs to be completed between S.W. 39th Street and S.W. 41st Street to improve traffic flow through the area. Design Engineering: 1. Approve Preliminary Site Plan only. 2. Detailed drainage plan required - 10 year frequency detention required for final. 3. Temporary erosion control plan required for grading permit. Policy Development: Advise circulation of larger-scale site plan to get a specific look at each of the parking lot area circulation, configuration and landscaping. Building and Zoning: 1. The same setback that was required for Benaroya should be maintained from Springbrook Creek. ISSUE: SHOULD THE SAME SETBACK BE REQUIRED? The Benaroya site plan approval was conducted in 1978 prior to a decision being reached on the construction of the P-1 Channel. The applicant is proposing only 10 feet of landscaping adjacent to Springbrook Creek. The Benaroya complex has approximately 30 feet. Increasing the landscape buffer along Springbrook Creek would eliminate approximately 60 parking spaces. Thus the total parking provided north of S.W. 41st Street would be reduced to 1320 spaces. This does comply with the requirement of 1248 spaces. 2. Parking must be permanent if used as required parking for building complex. Submit bond, lease or other documentation. ISSUE: REQUIRED PARKING MUST BE PERMANENT. WHAT METHOD OF ASSURANCE SHOULD BE UTILIZED? Section 4-2204(3)(A)(5) of the Parking and Loading Ordinance allows required parking to be provided "adjacent to the building or use requiring the parking, or may be located across a street from the building or other use, provided, that the street is a less intensively classified street than an arterial." The applicant would appear to fall under this classification. The section does not specify any particular i 7 i i PRELIMINARY REPORT IHE HEARING EXAMINER BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY, SA-056-85/CU-057-85 AUGUST 27, 1985 PAGE 6 length of time for the lease. However, Section 4-2204(6) suggests a minimum of 5 years for a joint use situation. The problem is that if the leases are not renewed or cancelled then the buildings can not be occupied. It appears that the only way to assure continued use of a parking lot for required parking for use on a separate adjacent lot is to own both lots and place restrictive covenants on the lots so they must be sold together. If both the buildings and parking lots are leased the leases can be tied together. In this case it is possible to require restrictive covenants on the parking lots leased to Boeing Aerospace Company by Burlington Northern Railroad Company to be specific and state that the property cannot be sold or the lease cancelled as long as the Boeing Aerospace Company utilizes the Benaroya Complex as proposed. 5. In conjunction with the conditional use permit the parking lot area must comply with Section 4-2204(3)(C)(1) of the Parking and Loading Ordinance. Four criteria are established for the placement of off site parking on separate legal lots. These criteria are complied with in the following manner. The proposed parking lots will provide the majority of the required parking for the buildings located on the north side of S.W. 41st Street that are being converted to office uses. A total of 1380 parking spaces would be required for these four buildings. The new parking lots will provide 980 spaces, while approximately 400 spaces will be provided on the building sites. The parking lots are designed to the Parking and Loading Ordinance standards; however, the Fire Department has questioned turning radii inside the parking lots on the entire site plan area of 78 acres. The parking lots will not be lease or rented out to private individuals nor will there be repairs of automobiles allowed on site. SITE PLAN: 6. The second part of the application is site plan approval of the entire 78 acre parcel known as the Benaroya Complex. The seven buildings were originally constructed as a manufacturing and warehousing facility. The redesign proposed by Boeing Aerospace Company would put 99 per cent of the office space north of S.W. 41st Street and all but 21,000 sq. ft. of the manufacturing process south of the same street. That means that 60 per cent of the demand for parking will be north of 41st. A total of 2,542 parking spaces are proposed by applicant, while 2053 parking spaces are required. The construction of Raymond Ave. S.W. will eliminate approximately 60 spaces and with the widening of the landscape buffer along Springbrook Creek another 60 spaces will be lost. This will reduce the total parking to 2,422. 7. In the review of a site plan, the staff and Hearing Examiner should consider the following criteria: A. Compatibility with adjacent structures. B. Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. C. Access. D. Functionality of a parking lot. E. Traffic circulation. F. Pedestrian circulation. 7. Most of these points have been discussed for the proposed parking lots along the southside of S.W. 39th Street. The following is an analysis of how the entire project ties together: A. Pedestrian Circulation: The critical point here is that adequate pedestrian corridors should be provided between the new parking lots and the employment focus of the industrial complex. Over 60 per cent of the employment will be concentrated north of S.W. 41st Street adjacent to the new parking lots. Sidewalks along the extension of Raymond Avenue S.W. and a connection at the far western edge of the parking area should provide convenient and safe pedestrian access. 1 9 1 I k I 9 I V 1 I' PRELIMINARY REPORT THE HEARING EXAMINER BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY, SA-056-85/CU-057-85 AUGUST 27, 1985 PAGE 7 B. Traffic circulation: The ERC was extremely concerned with traffic volumes and circulation. A traffic study was conducted to clearly identify and propose solutions to the anticipated traffic congestion. These mitigation measures must be done. C. Functionality of Parking Lot: On site circulation is extremely important because of the large size of the industrial complex. Emergency access both to and inside the parking areas is critical. The parking lots do have some design problems with turning radii. Approximately 60 parking spaces are not acceptable along Lind Avenue S.W. because even though the spaces can be striped, there are not any clearly defined boundaries for parking in the middle of the lot. The Fire Department needs to have final review authority at the building permit stage. There does appear to be more than a ten per cent surplus of parking above City code requirements even with the loss of another 60 parking spaces. D. Access: New traffic signalization at S.W. 41st Street and Lind Ave. S.W. will control the primary access to the site. Only emergency access should be allowed along both Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 43rd Street. Presently there are gated accesses, which do tend to confuse motorists because they are so wide. Some people use them as turn arounds. The site was designed for multiple tenants and there was a visable need. Under the present proposed design, these accesses should be eliminated except for emergency access purposes. E. Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code: The proposal does comply with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and the specifies of the Zoning Code. The area is designated as Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option. The actual size of the proposal is the primary impacting factor that has to be analyzed with greater caution. F. Compatibility with adjacent structures: The staff has taken the liberty to expand this concept to not only include structures, but uses. The proposal seems totally compatable with all of the adjacent uses. However, the size of the project may intimidate the potential uses north of S.W. 39th Street. In all other respects the proposal is similar with adjacent structures. Consideration of adjacent uses raises the issue of maintenance. Major street improvements were conducted along S.W. 43rd Street including landscaping. The adjacent property owners are responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping to the curb. It is definitely obvious that this has not occurred. 8. In conclusion, both the conditional use permit request and the site plan approval request are appropriate with some conditions based upon design modifications. The proposal does comply with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code and Parking and Loading Ordinance. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Hearing Examiner grant approval of the conditional use permit request, file number CU-057-85, for the Boeing Aerospace Company subject to the following conditions: 1. The filing of restrictive covenants that (1) on the property being utilized for parking that the property can not be sold or the lease cancelled unless the buildings located to the south in the Benaroya Complex are vacated or remodeled to comply with the requirements of the City of Renton's Parking and Loading Ordinance and (2) on the property that is north of S.W. 41st Street in the Benaroya Complex that if the parking lots to the north, which are south of S.W. 39th Street, are no longer used for required parking that either the buildings be vacated or remodeled to comply with the requirements of the City of Renton's Parking and Loading Ordinance. f PRELIMINARY REPORT THE HEARING EXAMINER BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY, SA-056-85/CU-057-85 AUGUST 27, 1985 PAGE 8 2. The parking lot plans shall be modified to include a 30 foot wide landscaping strip along the western boundary adjacent to Srpingbrook Creek. It is also recommended that the site plan approval request on the entire 78 acre parcel, file number SA-056-85, for the Boeing Aerospace Company, be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Installation of a full traffic signal at the intersection of S.W. 41st Street and Lind Avenue S.W. 2. Extension of Raymond Avenue S.W. from its present dead end south of S.W. 39th Street to S.W. 41st Street. 3. The filing of restrictive covenants to proportionally contribute to the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of S.W. 39th Street and Lind Avenue S.W. at the time of development of eith of the building lots located on the north side of S.W. 39th Street. 4. The railroad crossings that presently exist on S.W. 41st Street shall be either removed or sanctioned by the Washington State Utilities and Transportation Committee (UTC). 5. Elimination or redesign of accesses on S.W. 43rd Street and Lind Avenue S.W. to the approval of the Fire Department and the Public Works Department. 6. The applicant shall be responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping adjacent to the site that is located on public right of way. Failure to do so will allow the Parks and Recreation Department or the Public Works Department the right to maintain the landscaping and charge the applicant all maintenance and administrative costs of either the actual work or enforcement. II 11 1 1 1^ I 1 1 1 f^ fI 1 1 U-_- ---- I - h — I i J1 I I I I I 1 S W 30IN sr S M 3 5' S 1 1 1 1 1is- 1 1 ' I _J W-- _ S. '• I -- • 34TH STREET 11 I 1 i Q I M-P L 8 1 14, __ 1 11 I I 1 ' y_1 ' l 1 i U 11 Li 1f ',_____1 w e*, TT 6, TE I 7 2 1111‘ i l'//// X e dr 0(/':,/ v-- — . r"Flifft"r- .--".-- . 41):Iiii: "%lg. .417_ - lj S 4 i 1 v. 7 6 I 7;1M_P e 5 l' ,,,I L- 1 1 2 3 A..'"i t.ea.•-Jawo 1is- r.3• a i BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY SA-056-85, W-057-85 APPLICANT BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY TOTAL AREA - 78.0 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS LIND AVE S.W. AND S.W. 39TH STREET EXISTING ZONING M-P, MANUFACTURING PARK EXISTING USE PARKING LOT SITE UNDEVELOPED; REST OF SITE DEVELOPED PROPOSED USE OFF-PREMISE PARKING AREA AND CONVERSION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS TO OFFICES AND ELECTRONICS LABGRATORY. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION AND MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION-OFFICE COMMENTS 9 1 a. •®`. 1•17 ' - p°0Q000 0 7• • • • ',. ti' 111= ii •..• • .• •o opopopopo • • umrMIhr.,. 0- 0'00'00' On.000. AIL.. a 1ir To 1rr%1S111.11-_-._ r 1. l-, J iij OQ00000p000°o°J i 0,,0 W 1 i o°0o°0p0°Opopoo• r 4111111 1..1•11, K1 1g.‘1:'1W,%•,• 4i4)4;;•; 1•I. fP iiyr 1,1 a. tpr. 4 i,;,cz3ivS P° a ' 1 i•1 i:i . o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°oil °o' loi essiiii o i O °O°O°• f F1, it 0 0 0 0 0 0p0°O°• 4 O 1AI•N 1- i YY'"' 5 MH 1..-„ o) I- 1. i'. I,,/ I U:kif'III///Ir''__J 11 n`"M[ usu 1 .00a0000' uii/1 Aiiir? 1 . 6, f; . n1i < . i la•u Q .opopopo°o°o i • •luu o•I. f Epp ls I• o 0 0 0 0 c/fK`'. c.,, ,10 G12'hn, s UM•I•Ow IIII1e ;000 Y: 1 fit+ f , 11 I al.I•a/11/1 °.•'+_iiifff___ 1nn':}n ° O Ila Ill.O011w•1• ./ t :'C)°1- .• ,• t o e\'.- 41,1111, al® .ii OO wa•u• ifir.:e>O •,un uo•'•ir r t),,, .<.• ..•11111•111011110,.aps!aa oat :saa!;agr rt... 0••••/•• T.7• --__-_- ...---:'_.-_-._-_-= ' 1 wU1 VSL. • 0ansamia Isar' . or f s,r,N f g-__ _"-` '-: ;VIA ;::if 1v.v, x. I, iTfJ[i} .00°oo•.• s. a . u/.n l Iasal •000 :::::i:y' VVV 1111FOZ-0 000000000 „ I 1 1• 0 ,-. s.4 e•"o e(' Q =__= 0000000000 ---—_ I 1 Ailaw a t?. I. t G.w• _--_ o000000000• :..-. _ 1•=•a.-.••sa aaa••a t ff'^ .• -__- 0000000000•.J ____ aa a••=-.=aiaa aaaaaaa•aa l'.4.1,` •"( • __ •'000000000000°°°°°°°°• ` -_---- _---•-------- t.m.:amii::u::::: : ` t.•.':; '1j oop00000000por„}c••. -%00000000000000 _---- t••e•c • 6000000000000000 = t.it a1 aaal•aaal•' k o000000• • Ak ••;,....T.x.1272,...... iir tik 1_ : i- ..--- IIII .•.•.• t is a I li= ::I,• _ Argy -uIit:o°o..... 000 Ilaliv a ' .. AII.bong,' ills.\••i••n'w 1a1.; a,, I1c,r Ills•l. cm oast o,•i:•',,, .-. a l(!i1R!• ,„, 0`0 Y.' , YIU•s..AI1w sa i 0000 C. 0000o o • wl+ 111 j._ 0000 f-. o0000 'T•' 1•117s1 CF<Ill..•.••w .MIR. r . - 1 _-- -_-_--_-- 0000• C.jFY '•i a00000• ,: U•1••I -lllu•••=Iles a10 gdJl. ____ _---_--- .c 00000 00000° 7 u•wlal ..!.11»••=_•_••__ , IDCC _ 000. o°0000• iu :u uiiw u„_ r f•' 1 l s s•ss•w :f° 7qs=71R17 . f. o0000.. J .' 1;;; w,-•. . —_-__-__ - 4•' i wa b . --'s+AO' , L, 1 0 i Vic;.; i:.;,,. il.fis:N.,. I• 4111),PIPr k Alma, 0000•. Y• fj j/ 11..I<.' r t t. 1:' •O°o0°O°O°OOCO, t•• P i M..I I..II f 1 w w i:• II sw i1'çJk?IPC ; i • ! uw 1 i ' 7uw aw 63 ______,i- _.. - W43''• .1, o000•'o00°0°0°0° t:>i: :,X,,,..ri00000•00000• 1 0000•000000• J oe. 000Op y .J LAND USE ELEMENT 1ii I 1 7 Single Family s::=I Commercial l 1 Low Density I Multi-Family ` Office / Office Park i l Medium Density a000000 i:i ...... Multi-Family 0000 0o Public/Ouasi-Public tEgigiek-I k _ High Density Light Industrial I ig gag 0.000g 8Multi-Family o000000Io000000 0 O°o°O°O°O°o°O°O l Recreation Heavy Industrial 9 - 0 0OO 14.-.,`, Greenbelt Manufacturing Park 1 9 d d 0 i 117-' a a:,..NODs-l1 gs.R"i-et0 .». s.,.. G. 1-24 GIs 4,K,,1; • '. _ .`!y ,)J Illli111 IIII 11111 ttll It l.,. IIII 1 .Illl,e1" !1.1ag lnl li WIM 0 9 ff' ri• f It _ ' ry -`; III I t%1: - .. ia6 1l _,T1, 1) y / /` /Y'a. _/ ram A II I 1 l .I" 11II III C 1 I 1 U -Q y/ gy p I I III' t f`t j t t I- 11-- -•- 1 11 _ t?F l.•Y1 TT III fl I Illllf' i iI 4.4.4.4 IIII I111 111 I 1 1 al i, Nii • / fI`i,1 I 11111 WWII 1,'i II ,1 1 1 1 1 W 11 i 1 0 1' .I 1TTTt''R"T=. 1•7---"'":- _ ITTT, e-- l- - -- - - I i ---- OFFICE OFFICE LAB OFFICE 96K vd 75K 21K IlK V OFFICE 33. 5K LI 7.814 1 I 7.81.5i U o o7-81-6 1•7 L ... i f;::: ) ! J 0 'U d STRICTc r Q f J Q t• t) LAB I 5OK I. FAB a. a a 145.3K STRG STRG J11 53K 16.7K 0 98K STRG r 4 165K STRG so STRG STRG 82K OFFICE ad 0 V a 1e• -• FA 0y 337. 4K 7OK L r_.....__.r-1 7.81-1 7.81.7 7.81.3 r._._._.____r--t_.__..._._n r r----L_r) c =A 1 g, 4st1 f•TIIIIT d_• r1 CITY o^ TVtDJCE ram I iIllJUL219851.1 11 ,l I A ElUILDING/ZONING DEPT. 72 , VICINITY MAP 47 If , sort- III1111111ie/ t_ SCALE: In•40' e4- 11/01111111N M l. O iii Col•cmtr Misr 114::. Prflel...4 04 riiigg=11M w alel n•ar=1 arlrel/ + •.al•we/w.eMeY•Ieo• o.e V /it+ e4 4 1r VW; iffedialtrill10--OW . &eta-. fAtti . (.....----- oz, op., 4 , : ',7 \ 04 kit9 0,‘,.` s 2., ..0„,,,.... A ..... , . r yel hPo` V SI e IMP WV....• s 1 4 111 rr- 4.5:\s\ \ r.sAh'm IIwon! V!1 di JJ:Jf1Dfi I I v/ QI, I L "o0 I• ;Iar.1V M . /t. - .I rl `Mv. I M7AVA iY w a L 47 R A / .L R O A O Rp,W a'' ll— A brcye.r Par.Ary I 11 1 I + I 1 1 1 1 i i i i ; III !I I I I i Q r C.. .-WUIMt••m I 11 1 1 I I I 1 11 1 11 i mmme<.amm.ammm..mmmm•..mm....i-+y—I _ mmmmmm.m.e..e....e.,,....smmm.mmmmmmmmme...e.... I•—-*"— r"" E J mmm..E m LEGEND DATA I 1 =_•_= 0h N6t"'1 I Ox--- I I if 11 I • wvr..+ />..e Po/or/.v../ s Q Ac T o s« eM., 2 O aoem Ti•s Area/n sarMnp 7B.r J C12yam,y 41V1• Fe, C• S•$ • e SArld a Grol.oto+r iYonnnp. Lanmcvp»p IBA. osnig) Loev I H7.Mnb iils»np) Tab/fbrt.np-9610 AW,.l7 MabMate-cyclese 2JllC7ti5(. s w r•gAR w c i L.p nls(Lumrnoias/M/ non- • A R w/ arrow SAd/ by Per Coy All 1w NIL f 1'."a• Of Atior nS)antnfs 6:t7RS r r.4n1o, sc...w.r d ES/ON SECr/ON A-A I•Io' 2••••r it a a 9 i 0 i 1 V i 9 1 r e l i i j CITY O7 .N N l.—w I: I 6 II• Tri L) Fli T I Inl J U L 12 1985 4/I11IIIQ' 1111 1 1 I: r _ r' .1—"' .. _ „ r' BUILD3NG/ZONING DEPT, S=LE I- I = y` 4 . I Lo.mr np Ib i: E/mel>anc.Code so i.o: L wrrnsw/fib LoogIen/ SU ArH..Som. ITNYr—a[oY. eu SW.l9M T.S lEdst1881 1_ 9':V//iiw//IU/.u."t BViwW///////lrLUI.V_//.r/.—..-Y/hv 'a 8 fa ry% v//y'I//I/ Aft I i sfQ r . nSe&e-. wi//'-w '"' C^ Stir r 4/r 7 I'6 aC I 0,111s::. frrv.:__Y4. ,i-.. ..-..' G, !r 7. '+/ i w ) •.aw UP Q fljm11IJj- Mrsewrrnn4gi sl ti 1 p _ Not To Bs Improved k. 3 8 Y E •, P , 4 ..... lib 0 0 1 I At This Time Q III, I fit g "'' y 1 i - j SI:P. ISIMPer II RM? Pou rr ur rrr rrrr t r I I r •1 14. i elfi[ :r'i3+'1t/=lE_ri 4'l:B1i',e,I f i' i• aigi YtE 'E 02 Y r..r..v. F.w,.rM Len far.r F\"T\/-"-1—. I--mTTTT-r. r I-1TT-TTTT -7-7',1----`mccc.m ,,, m..... .-,,,,,,.R.vr,mccc.mm,c.,c.tc.mmmmcccmmcccamn, r v 3 .: ^, J I I I I I I I I I I A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 ram.6^ 7 ti\--,` :i Y I I I 1 I I 1 1 I f M i i I I 1 1 I rT 3 0,` 1 QJ i3IIIIIlIll , l l Li 11 1 1 1 , 1 Irt-'. ---,I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I , 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 , 1 I a ---1 IL;c` I --1UJ1 L1_11LU 1LL1 I_LLJJJLL—_ L 3 __, O C1F,`ccc.mccc.mc<acmmcmccccm cR.mcmcmR..m. 1 a __ Cr.) (Q,,1 p E s.. Above For Ca/W oliu 0 _=J V R d I i. Ktvitw1Nb Dt'AK IMhNT/DIVISION : rQL./cy (.. r ve. _c ''Yn67Y7_ APPROVED ROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED S.c‘ 6/61-L i C DATEgs— SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1952 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : FI CZ-e El APPROVED Ll APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED I . \ecEss +o ?AQK L..ot* 4r 1Z rrot1. 0,0 LA4JQ.. Z Qn t awrA-LS --LyzVv —1IrbN' . 2. pu2pose QC deQoVIA dlz "'cc- aQ- C'kC o/1ical2;ea k D% a Nd wn y\LMc i-..cr;2 i cite 'i s//' I 2ec 1 Q U Y`C a Sub trvl ,I nkOlQdn2t Ova f„"lg, vb, US.e. O 22X`dZC'C or Yv\ak-2.r As. 1 ems S. MO9 rv\a.) Ib` 0 s WAs L b s a co i di,'ci b v oSr-- .,c t t. .. C litt o j 1,. fl4 d c7 icl ebe-LAW-A 341-1^- a,1 5o 4 I sr R DATE: f- 24 - SIGNAT R OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1952 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :BL17G n APPROVED 14 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 0 174-C SAk4£ S e?BAck t-M -r As i 6.4,a_s)amt) 6k124 f-E-- P p2-Qe-, a. ,,,fi gam, o74ti DATE ; SIGNATURE RFCTOR nR AIITNnRT7Fn RFPRFSFNTATTVF 1 y1 1 KtV1EWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : I ( APPROVED PROVED WITH CONDITIONS i ( NOT APPROVED If y*oINo A4-e. S . YIP 0-1 TO / co",/L 61" 84r- EMv 5 (iv . 3?S T 'lNo S, _ve V iirST 74 s s /I4!a v E 7 €4A .c/C AL v vv 7`ftlek V 7716 lepe. DATE : 7'4 I -. 8 5- SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : I ( APPROVED JPROVED WITH CONDITIONS l INOT APPROVED c/)n-ii S/ e p:724f t 4/.,9 e p//.,,... 'ef //-Fv o% T tit. 1 d r, Ti d T eeA t.a4 7 er6:14/ #t 1[i.-c_ " / grads DATE : i/i ./ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 47i_iry IAPPRJVED t ( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS EINOT APPROVED UTILITY APPROVAL SINIECT TO LATE COMERS AGREEMENT WATER NO LATE COMERS AGREEMENT SEWER No xt,L yK_// SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CN* SE - WATER SYSTEM IEVILIPMENT CHARGE • SEWER NO SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CII - WATER No SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - SEWER AJO APPROVEJ WATER r.AN A C Ar6C wr, 11.1 tyCr60151 2C--Qulatea f r CO'/ ' Pc q/ APPROVED ;'PER PLO NO peso (S5164.4' NYD4.4ir (1 .0GATiof15 A7 APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LUCAHIONS AELSSSS IT FIRE DEPT. YES F11E FLH ANALYSIS Nti DATE : 9 - / SIGNATURE OF IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 3 REVI€WIIIG DEPARTMENT/DIVT"TON ; FPF'ROVED F-1 ,- rPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED P & K IA) h ReA . c © uc, p BE At P Rom Le rf tv t t= E PLO YE4S 2e9U5othtj/r N o NRec.- . prrO,i . DATE : gal.3 gsSI1 ,TUR; 0 RECTO OR THO ZED R PRESEN ATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 132 REVIEWIN,3 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; 717FAPPOVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I INOT APPROVED u i DATE :27 ,Y5 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182. 0 y . II a 3 0927N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-087-85 APPLICATION NO(s).: SA-056-85/CU-057-85 DE`.SCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow a seven building complex currently used for fabrication to convert large portions to electronics laboratory and office spaces and an application for a conditional use permit to allow for an off-premise parking lot totalling 980 spaces for cars and 28 spaces for motorcycles for the expanded use. PROPONENT: BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY. LOI.'ATION OF PROPOSAL: West of Lind Avenue between S.W. 39th Street and S.W. 43rd Street. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable sigr ificant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is rot required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Thi; information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no latE r than August 25, 1985. Yo. should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Bui:ding and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DA T E OF DECISION: August 7, 198 PUEBLICATION DATE: August 12, 1985 Orali 4I Kor ald G. Nelson a y M. Sprl ger Building and Zoning Director Policy Developments•irector Ric''iard C. Houghton Public Works Director OF RF iv BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR 09 co MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0,9 P q • SEP1-00 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR August 15, 1985 Robert D. Scholes, P.E. ESN , Inc. 451 S.W. 10th, #106 Renton, WA 98055 Re: Site Plan Approval for conversion of seven buildings to electronics laboratory and office space and Conditional Use Permit to allow off premise parking area, file SA-056-85, CU-057-85; property located west of Lind Ave. between S.W. 39th St. and S.W. 43rd St. Dea- Mr. Scholes: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on July 12, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for August 27, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sinc irely, La-p4RogerJ. Blaylock Zoni lg Administrator RJB:JMM:wr 188 5 Z cc: B. D. Zimmerman, Boeing Glacier Park Company i I i I OF RA,. y ' BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR o 0 s fix` MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0q, 6-0 SEP-c • BARBAF'A Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR August 15, 1985 Boe,ng Aerospace Company Att,:ntion: B. D. Zimmerman P.O. Box 3999, MS 89-02 Sea:tie, WA 98124-2499 Re: Site Plan Approval for conversion of seven buildings to electronics laboratory and office space and Conditional Use Permit to allow off premise parking area, file SA-056-85, CU-057-85; property located west of Lind Ave. between S.W. 39th St. and S.W. 43rd St. Dee r Mr. Zimmerman: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on July 12, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for August 27, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. ThE applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sin erely, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJI3:JMM:wr 18€5Z cc: Robert D. Scholes, ESM, Inc. Glacier Park Company 9 I i 1 I b i i i i I OF R4, 4 E 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR rn0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 09~ EC SEPjE O P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR Auc ust 15, 1985 Glacier Park Company 1011 Western Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Re: Site Plan Approval for conversion of seven buildings to electronics laboratory and office space and Conditional Use Permit to allow off premise parking area, file SA-056-85, CU-057-85; property located west of Lind Ave. between S.W. 39th St. and S.W. 43rd St. Dear Sirs: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on July 12, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land USE Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for August 27, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. ThE applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sin:erely, Roder J. Bl1-- --ty-A"e-Vi ck Zoning Administrator RJI3:JMM:wr 18E 5Z cc: Robert D. Scholes, ESM, Inc. B. D. Zimmerman, Boeing Aerospace Company w 1 r 1 J 187E,Z NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING E)“,MINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON AUGUST 27, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a proposed children's playground in Jones Park (file SA-061-85) and an application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (file SM-009-85); property located east of Wells Ave. S. and south of the Cedar River. MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES Application to rezone approximately 2.52 acres of property from R-2 to B-1 (file R-051-85) to allow the subject site to be constructed with office buildings; located on the east side of Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. at 4904 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY Application for site plan approval (file SA-056-85) to allow a seven story building complex currently used for fabrication to convert large portions to electronics laboratory and office spaces and an application for a conditional use permit (file CU-057-85) to allow for an off-premise parking lot totalling 980 spaces for cars and 28 spaces for motorcycles for the expanded use; located west of Lind Avenue between S.W. 39th Street and S.W. 43rd Street. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 27, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPI\IONS. PUE LISHED : August 16, 1985 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIF ICATION I, J=ANETTE SAMEK-MC KAGUE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. AT1 EST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Not ary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in fe674 r0 iJ on the /(n JD day of August, 1985. n ,1LIY112-(1 C - SIGNED: rf II 1 OF RA, 9, o u 09g ` D SEPSE O P City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a PUBLIC HEARING in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS . CITY HALL ON AUGUST 27, 1985 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M. CONCERN I NG: SA-056-85, CU-057-85 REZONE From To SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT To OFF PREMISE PARKING LOT FOR 980 CARS AND 28 MOTORCYCLES, X SITE APPROVAL I I SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVISION of Lots PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE FROM GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS : LOCALED WEST OF LIND AVENUE BETWEEN S.W. 39TH STREET AND S.W. 43RD STREET, LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION SIGNIFICANT ZNON-SIGNIFICANT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING& ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION i ti i RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEP MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 087 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-056-85, CU-057-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT : BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PROJECT TITLE : 39th & LIND PARKING AREA AND RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX. APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW 7-BUILDING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF LLPgqROJgqETTCT : COMPLEXXXCCCCEURRRECCNTLLY USED FOR TTFAArBNRIILCCAUTION TO CONVERT LARGE PORTIONPFEMIEEE TROIICSLOTBT TA INGA9 00SPACESSFORECQRSNANd023ISP CES F8I LUa MOTORCYCLES FOR SAID EXPINDED USE. LOCATION :LOCATE[) WEST OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AT THE 3900 BLOCK. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/31/85 1] ENGINEERING DIVISION 11 TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1 UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIFE PREVENTION BUREAU qPAFKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 ; 00 P .M , ON JULY 30, 1985 REVIEWIAG DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; 5-1;4P 'ROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I [ NOT APPROVED N O PA-Ric " U A-ReA . c o up B E fk Oil L E ry. N -T/( pus)rE t F E C R e9Oco FeTc,g4 ioi1 Y r N aN thug. SI TLRE 0 RECTOR OR THO ZED R PRESEN ATIVEDATE ; 9"-% 39 gs REVISION 5/1982 Prran 1 R a RENTC BUILDING & ZONING DEP&. AENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 087 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-056-85, CU-057-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT ; BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PROJECT TITLE : 39th & LIND PARKING AREA AND RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX. APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW 7-BUILDING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: COMPLEX CURRENTLYpCC USEDEp FORON TTFAABR{{II CAUTION TO CONVERT LARGE PORTIONS TU ELECTRONICS OTBTJTAOINGA9DOOSPACESSFORECARSNAN8OZ ISW F6 MOTORCYERMII CLES FOROFFICE-PFEMISE PARKING L 88 SAID EXPINDED USE. LOCATION :IOCATFD WEST OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AT THE 3900 BLOCK. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/31/85 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : I UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Ej POLICE DEPARTMENT 0 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENT;, OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON JULY 30, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED DATE : lS SIGNATL'RE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 16. II 1 9 j M 4 RENT(' BUILDING & ZONING DEPA AiENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 0E7 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-056-85, CU-057-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT : BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PROJECT TITLE : 39th & LIND PARKING AREA AND RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX. APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW 7-BUILDING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF LLPAAROJgqETTCppTRR: COMPLEX CURRENTLYUSEDEp FOR FABRICATION NN TO CONVERT LARGE PORTIONPIEMISEEPAROII SLOTBT TALINGA9 OO PACESSFORECARANAN O ISPACg PERMII LUN MOTORCYCLESSLFOR SAID EXPANDED USE. LOCATION ;1OCATF) WEST OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AT THE 3900 BLOCK. TO : IPUELIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/31/85 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU l SPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I BOTHERS : COMMENT'; OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON JULY 30, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : l2 n APPROVED F54 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ] NOT APPROVED I . Necess -ro Yoh e t< ,3 6 I..o t- -VT) I M i? VA)tAJZA Are. rzo L 2'- z dtcorAc. f r A-Lks _t to —2 V'b v v . . 2• %1-02 pUgp0S— OC OAS1/1 i("IA T A& Z L re. . a Q-Ci iZo'1i Lab2t a'i Dv, aAd hn 2c (r,e 'P( 0i-e i S Qt ' TipS142 n&* t n-(0 Q ti 2, o vyakk if(""PC ov\ lnnct rya S. 3. y rncf)e s was 2eq; L b ng64sacavroff- c tv per aLia DATE : 7- r29 - c4-"- SIGNAT R TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 18, 9 1 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEP4 MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - ')87 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-056-85, CU-057-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT : BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PROJECT TITLE : 39th & LIND PARKING AREA AND RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX. APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW 7-BUILDING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: COMPLEX CURRENTLYUSEDEp FOR TTFABRICATION TO CONVERT LARGE PORTION`. TO ELECTRONICS OTBT TAOINGA9 OOSPACESSFORECRRSNAN 0 3ISP ES R MOTORCYCLLESLFOROFFICE- REMISE PARKING L SAID EXPANDED USE. LOCATIO1 :I OCATFf) WEST OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AT THE 3900 BLOCK. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/31/85 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : IUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIFE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT l ( BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 ' ,M, ON JULY 30, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : RAPPPOVED AAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS flNOT APPROVED A y,k allo Ave. s . Afte s ro #c co".purge f ru-,FEN s . 3 f 71(5 r, 4No s. v v/1"ST, v E reof/G/‘/C ,L V vv thilkAti TMF DATE : 7 -4 / -. 85- SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1082 Fnrm 182 d I G RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPJ 'MAENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 087 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-056-85, CU-057-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT : BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PROJECT TITLE : 39th & LIND PARKING AREA AND RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX. APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALL - BRIEF D :SCRIPTION OF LLPgqR000JgqETTCT: COMPLEX CURRENTLYUSED FORTTFAABNNRILLCAUTIOOtN TO CONVERT LARGE OeFIC NFREMISEEPAR INGSLOTBT3TA INGA9 OOSPACESSFORECARSNAND02gISP C S F6R MOTORCYCE SLFOR SAID EXFANDED USE. LOCATION :LOCATFD WEST OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AT THE 3900 BLOCK. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/31/85 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : l UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT in OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITI4G , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 ' ,M, ON JULY 30, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPf',OVED JPROVED WITH CONDITIONS l. NOT APPROVED 1) 1 l ti cii4 ',LA I^9 e ref u il-- /d y , '9 dQ?&47" 4.• I' ya/red fI CL) r e-t- ta,.4r, / p/ u /real .... gradl DATE : 7/// SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 iJ RENTe "' BUILDING & ZONING DL. "—MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW W, UNTON JUL 1 6 1985 ECF - (87 _ 85 POLICY DFVFLOPMF!NT nFPT. APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-056-85, CU-057-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONEI4T : BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PROJECT TITLE : 39th & LIND PARKING AREA AND RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX. APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW 7-BUILDING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : OoT COMPLEX CURRENTLYUSEDEp FORpp TTFAABRILCATION TO CONVERT LARGE O FI O RE&EPARO NGSLOBT3TAIINGA9 OOSPACESSFORECARSNANEO 8IIN n V6 FIRMII MOTORCYCLES SAID EXPANDED USE. LOCATION :LOCATF0 WEST OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AT THE 3900 BLOCK. TO : i I PUELIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/31/85 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : E] UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTF]OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON JULY 30, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : fOL/CY (Zv6-Lo,P/j'1&---A7--- n APPROVED ED WITH CONDITIONS l I NOT APPROVED f,- s s 6-0.., - - 4.,, ,64,-„,.,s iSi-,, r DATE : 7/3o(5-- SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 0 RENT( BUILDING & ZONING DEPA .4IENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - C87 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-056-85, CU-057-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT : BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PROJECT TITLE : 39th & LIND PARKING AREA AND RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX. APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW 7-BUILDING BRIEF FOR NVERT ORTIO DS.S ORE E IONCTRONIOF PROJECT : COMPLEX CURRDTLY S OT INGA9OOSPACESSFRERRSNADOZISPAC SAF NMOOTOROCYCDLESLFORGE OFFICE-PREMISE PARKING L SAID EXP4NDED USE. LOCATION' :I OCATFO WEST OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AT THE 3900 BLOCK. TO : n PUELIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/31/85 DENGINEERING DIVISION 11 TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1 UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Ea BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHi:RS ; COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON JULY 30, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : BLDG n APPROVED RAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED 774-c SAS 6 S - -SAc1- AJ"1 ,.v E P Feonc 5//emu C o AR_k iAJ cevza oi,z) Re 6-ki24 e69 l rGi DATE : 2-6), --R-5-- SIGNATUREXCrETIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 3 IiI f I N yN 7 q FORM 115 N * TICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. SA-056-85, CU-057-85, ECF-087-85 PROPOSED ACTION APPI I(ATI ON FOR SITE P._AN APPROVAI TO Al LOW A SFVEN BIMII DING CHI FX TO BF CONVERTED TO F I FCTRON I CS LABORATORY AND OFFICE SPACES AND AN APPI CATION FOR A CONDITIONAL _1JSF PFRMIT TO At I OW OFF PRFMISF PARKING FOR 980 CARS AND '<'.8 MOTORCYCLE SPACES, GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS LOCATED WEST OF L I ND AVENUE BETWEEN S.W. 39TH STREET AND S.W. 43RD STREET. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ( E.R.C. ) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DDOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AI\'1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL jWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 18 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., AUGUST 25, 1985 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION I I G 09 27N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-087-85 AF PLICATION NO(s).: SA-056-85/CU-057-85 DE SCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow a seven building complex currently used for fabrication to convert large portions to electronics laboratory and office spaces and an application for a conditional use permit to allow for an off-premise parking lot totalling 980 spaces for cars and 28 spaces for motorcycles for the expanded use. PF OPONENT: BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY. LC CATION OF PROPOSAL: West of Lind Avenue between S.W. 39th Street and S.W. 43rd Street. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. Th3 lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Th s information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Re3ponsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no lat3r than August 25, 1985. YoJ should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Bu lding and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DP TE OF DECISION: August 7, 198 PUBLICATION DATE: August 12, 1985 Flo iald G. Nelson a y M. Spr ger Building and Zoning Director Policy Development irL:ctor Ric hard C. Houghton Public Works Director 1 1 I 1 i 1 I I! 0925N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENT ON, WASHINGTON The Er vironmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following projects: BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY (ECF•-087-85) Application for site plan approval to allow a seven building complex currently used for fabrication to convert large portions to electronics laboratory and office spaces and an application for a conditional use permit to allow for an off-premise parking lot totalling 980 spaces for cars and 28 spaces for motorcycles for the expanded use, files SA-056-85 and CU-057-95; located west of Lind Avenue between S.W. 39th Street and S.W. 43rd Street. CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT ECF-093-85) Application for site plan approval (SA-061-85) to allow construction of a proposed children's playground in Jones Park and an application for shoreline substantial development permit (SM-009-85) to allow equipment within 200' of the Cedar River; located east of Wells Ave. S. and south of the Cedar River. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC actior must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by August 25, 1985. Published: August 12, 1985 a i a 1 d 414 a OF R j 4;z BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR zIraMINIM9 co MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0 P 97, SEP E0'. BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH N"AYOR MEMORANDUM August 7, 1985 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Environmental Review Committe SUBJECT: Boeing Aerospace Company/ECF-087-85/SA-056-85/CU-057-85 - Recommended Conditions The Environmental Review Committee, under their substantive authority, [Section 4-2822(D)] recommends to the decision-maker, the Hearing Examiner, that the Site Plan Approval request to allow a seven-building complex currently used for fabrication to convert large portions to electronics, laboratories, and office space and an application for a Conditional Use permit to allow for off-premise parking lots totally 980 spaces for cars and '8 spaces for motorcycles be issued subject to the following conditions: 1. Installation of a full traffic signal at the intersection of S.W. 41st and Lind Ave. S.W. The applicant has agreed in a letter dated July 30, 1985, to install the signal.) 2.Extension of Raymond Ave. S.W. from its present dead end south of S.W. 39th St. to S.W. 41st St. 3.The filing of restrictive covenants to proportionally contribute to the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of S.W. 39th St. and Lind Ave. S.W. at the time of development of either of the building lots located on the north side of S.W. 39th St. (The traffic evaluation completed anticipates, even with the extension of Raymond Ave. S.W., that the service level at the intersection of S.W. 39th St. and Lind Ave. S.W. will be a Level E at the time of construction of the parking lots. The intent is to require an updated traffic evaluation with the development of the properties on the north side of S.W. 39th St. and a proportionate sharing at that time for a signalization of said intersection.) Memo to the Hearing Examiner August 7, 1985 Page 2 4.The railroad crossings that presently exist on S.W. 41st St. shall be either removed or sanctioned by the Washington State Utilities and Transportation Committee UTC). Under Section 4-2822(D), the decision-maker must accept these conditions as binding upon his ultimate decision unless he .identifies in writing a substantial error in fact or conclusion by the Environmental Review Committee. The decision-maker then has the option of asking the Environmental Review Committee for reconsideration or revising the recommended conditions. The applicant also has the ability to appeal these conditions directly to the Hearing Examiner under authorities granted in Section 4-2823(A)(1)(a) within 14 days of the date the DNS is final. Therefore, the appeal date would be Monday, August 26, 1985, at 5:00 p.m. The appeal would be submitted in a form prescribed by both the Environmental Ordinance of the City of Renton and the Hearing Examiner Ordinance, Section 4-3011(B). RJE;:1864Z:wr F R 2 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR o 09 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 09gT_ 0 SEPT- ‹ c, P BARBAFA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR August 7, 1985 William S. Fetterley Austin Company 8100 S.W. 16th Street Rnton, Washington 98055 SA-038-85/Boeing Computer Office Building Approval Dear Mr. Fetterley: Tie above site plan request for the Boeing Computer Office Building 1Dcated on the southwest corner S.W. 16th Street and Lind Avenue S.W. was approved by the Hearing Examiner on July 8, 1985. His decision became final at 5 p.m. on July 22, 1985. The site plan approval is considered final . At this point you will continue with building permit process. Sincerely, Foger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator IJB;rjb 1 BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY A Division of The Boeing Company P.O.Box 3999 Seattle,Washington 98124-2499 July 30, 1985 2-4100-BDZ-458 City of Renton Municipal Building f y n; = _sfosie ' 200 Mill Avenue South t., t 1` Renton, Washington 98055 11985 Attention:Mr. Roger J. Blaylock JUL Zoning Administrator yty i2{};tt' Ld Subject: Boeing R. B. Complex S. W. 41st Street and Lind Avenue S.W. Reference: Letter dated May 30, 1985 Roger J. Blaylock to John S. Murdoch, Same Subject Gentlemen: As required in your letter, referenced above, Boeing is transmitting herewith four (4) copies of a traffic study that has been completed by the firm of Wm. E. Popp and Associates. The study was based on planning data developed by Boeing for the proposed use and occupancy of the R. B. Complex, which was furnished to the city by W. E. Bowden and M. A. Schultz on May 31, 1985. Boeing also agreed to provide the installation of signals to control traffic at the intersection of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 41st Street. We anticipate approval of funding early in 1986 and will initiate design and construction activities when funding is approved. We are currently waiting for a public hearing scheduled between August 21 and August 28, 1985, relative to an application for a building permit to construct a parking lot on the South side of S. W. 39th Street, East of Lind Avenue S.W., and for approval of conditional use of the changes to the R. B. Complex proposed by Boeing. (Permit Application No. SA-056-85) We believe the enclosed traffic report completes the requirement identified in your prior letter of May 30, 1985. Please address any questions on this matter to: BOE/AfG t City of Renton 2- 2-4100-BDZ-458 Boeing Aerospace Company Bruce D. Zimmerman, Mail Stop 89-02 Post Office Box 3999 Seattle, WA 98124-2499 Mr. Zimmerman may be reached at telephone 773-5650. Sincerely, BOEING A ' OSPACE COMPANY 40 W. E. Bowden Director of Facilities Enclosures: (4) Copies of Traffic Study cc: Ronald G. Nelson, Director Building & Zoning Department Richard Houghton Director of Public Works BDZ:dc T 0• 5 ', ! n J U119a bu;.Lnm`.:3 r RENT(' BUILDING & ZONING DEPA RENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 087 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-056-85, CU-057-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT : BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PROJECT TITLE : 39th & LIND PARKING AREA AND RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX. APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW 7-BUILDING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: gqRAATTRR COMPLEX CURRENTLYUSEDEp FORON]] TTFAABR{{II LLCATION TO CONVERT LARGE ORFIC NPFEMISFEPAR ING ABTOTAPINGA980OSPACESSFARECARSNANPOZ3ISPA ES V8k MOTORCYCLES`FOR SAID EXPPNDED USE. LOCATION :LOCATED WEST OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AT THE 3900 BLOCK. TO : DPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/31/85 ElENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : JUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I ] PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I OTF- ERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRIT] NG , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON JULY 30, 1985 REVIEWIPG DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : T'/L./Ty , '/•1C2/l ll, e/1 1G El APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TD LATE COMERS AGREEMENT - WATER ND LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • SEWER L7 C?, I )--// SYSTEM IEYELOPMENT CHASE - WATER 65 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - SEWER NO SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHRGE - WATER No SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE • SEWER A/0 APPROVE WATER PKAN 6S At62 AlAid 6CT&I5' (LC;-Qv'ac`o fc`I'< co-1P ALAAi APPROVED ,WEB PLAN+ NO Ac'° pbS5&-& NYoitwyr dace.dTiow3 A APPROVED FIRE NYDNART IUF;AflONS At1 SS t 4oTS Ir FIRE DEPT. 111E FLU AIUIYUIS No 9' I DATE : F4' SIGNATURE OF IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 1 rit CITY OF RENTON t.nvIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH«1 JUL 1 1985 REVUWING DEPARTMENT: YC) L I C POLIc`( DF\FLOPMrMT 11FPT, DATE CIRCULATED:JULY 18, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 30, 1985 ECF - 087 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SA-056-85, CU-057-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROP)NENT: BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PROJECT TITLE: 39th & LIND PARKING AREA AND RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW 7-BUILDING COMPLEX CURRENTLY USED FOR FABRICATION TO CONVERT LARGE PORTIONS TO ELECTRONICS LAB- ORITORY AND OFFICE SPACES, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW OFF-PREMISE PARKING LOT LOCATION: TOTALING 980 SPACES FOR CARS AND 28 SPACES FOR MOTORCYCLES FOR SAID EXPANDED U` LEATED WEST OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AT THE 3900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 78 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPA;T REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADERUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECO+IENDATION: DNS I MITIGATED DNS 1 EIS REVIEWED BY: `j TITLE: P/SS/S7 nQt - DATE: 7 361 R5— FORM #14 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Pc'P. S DATE CIRCULATED:JULY 18, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 30, 1985 ECF - 087 - 85 APPL::CATION NO(s). SA-056-85, CU-057-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT: BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PROJECT TITLE: 39th & LIND PARKING AREA AND RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW 7-BUILDING COMPLEX CURRENTLY USED FOR FABRICATION TO CONVERT LARGE PORTIONS TO ELECTRONICS LAB- ORATORY AND OFFICE SPACES, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW OFF-PREMISE PARKING LOT LOCA"ION: TOTALING 980 SPACES FOR CARS AND 28 SPACES FOR MOTORCYCLES FOR SAID EXPANDED U LQjATED WEST OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AT THE 3900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 78 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPAI;T REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 1- ,-{e c.o P&r to 62€ iis C o v - p PoRCem wo ektee_ S w n- L oo N Hog f2 RECCMMENDATION: 1 DNS f MITIGATED DNS I EIS REVIEWED BY: R.0,4 TITLE: DATE.: tle 2 cl 4 FORM ##14 i ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEt I E i Rencun Firc Dent l. Fre Prevention Bure il I' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: m DATE CIRCULATED:JULY 18, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 30, 1985 ECF - 087 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SA-056-85, CU-057-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL , CONDITIMAL-LU A P 8 IT) PROPONENT: BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PROJECT TITLE: 39th & LIND PARKING AREA AND RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW 7-BUILDING COMPLEX CURRENTLY USED FOR FABRICATION TO CONVERT LARGE PORTIONS TO ELECTRONICS LAB- ORATORY AND OFFICE SPACES, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW OFF-PREMISE PARKING LOT LOCATION: TOTALING 980 SPACES FOR CARS AND 28 SPACES FOR MOTORCYCLES FOR SAID EXPANDED U` LEATED WEST OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AT THE 3900 BLOCK. SITE AREA:_ 78 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services r/ 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 1:..ArvNb S u (ze_S i^() ft o(4.,.mac. s r.-z\\ (ACC ck^eA rvov-. S1,3 -2941, s 4`. k RECOPMIENDATION: n DNS x MITIGATED DNS EIS REVIEWED BY: ATITLE: (CU DATE: 1-2-9 FORM #14 1 r ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEti REV: EWING DEPARTMENT: k(L.AZ: DATE CIRCULATED:JULY 18, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 30, 1985 ECF - 087 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SA-056-85, CU-057-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROFONENT: BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PROHCT TITLE: 39th & LIND PARKING AREA AND RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW 7-BUILDING C011PLEX CURRENTLY USED FOR FABRICATION TO CONVERT LARGE PORTIONS TO ELECTRONICS LAB- ORATORY AND OFFICE SPACES, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW OFF-PREMISE PARKING LOT LOCATION: TOTALING 980 SPACES FOR CARS AND 28 SPACES FOR MOTORCYCLES FOR SAID EXPANDED U` LO;ATED WEST OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AT THE 3900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 78 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPART REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS MITIGATED DNS EIS REVIEWED BY:.- 1/G{,9erl TITLE: Zim.O _tee-e77 DATE: FORM ##14 I I i i ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE REV]EWING DEPARTMENT:115 L \) C DATE CIRCULATED:JULY 18, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 30, 1985 ECF - 087 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SA-056-85, CU-057-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL , CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROFONENT: BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PRO.;ECT TITLE: 39th & LIND PARKING AREA AND RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW 7-BUILDING CO1PLEX CURRENTLY USED FOR FABRICATION TO CONVERT LARGE PORTIONS TO ELECTRONICS LAB- ORATORY AND OFFICE SPACES, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW OFF-PREMISE PARKING LOT LOCATION: TOTALING 980 SPACES FOR CARS AND 28 SPACES FOR MOTORCYCLES FOR SAID EXPANDED U. LO;ATED WEST OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AT THE 3900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 78 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPA;T REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals I 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMIENDATION: y DNS MITIGATED DNS EIS REVIENED BY: C TITLE: DATE: j FORM #14 i V ENviRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE1 REV: EWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED:JULY 18, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 30, 1985 ECF - 087 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SA-056-85, CU-057-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL , CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROFONENT: BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PROJECT TITLE: 39th & LIND PARKING AREA AND RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW 7-BUILDING COMPLEX CURRENTLY USED FOR FABRICATION TO CONVERT LARGE PORTIONS TO ELECTRONICS LAB- ORATORY AND OFFICE SPACES, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW OFF-PREMISE PARKING LOT LOCATION: TOTALING 980 SPACES FOR CARS AND 28 SPACES FOR MOTORCYCLES FOR SAID EXPANDED U` LO;ATED WEST OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AT THE 3900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 78 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPA';T REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMME VTS: f',' . .Gr its t''rn eh f y QFfn'ieJ d r4)K a 9 e f/e-ri.. u /red- tev yr 4-et ccIe.4c 74 . h_ef4.4 I fr e 1 z) Te dz..c47 1 74-d/ F/ red e/ram RECOMMENDATION:AS1 DNS O MITIGATED DNS I 1 EIS nn pr1.- REVIEWED BY: K o TITLE: i DATE: FORM ##14 i ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEci REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: r" ! "E F IC DATE CIRCULATED:JULY 18, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 30, 1985 ECF - 087 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SA-056-85, CU-057-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT: BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PROJECT TITLE: 39th & LIND PARKING AREA AND RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW 7-BUILDING CCMPLEX CURRENTLY USED FOR FABRICATION TO CONVERT LARGE PORTIONS TO ELECTRONICS LAB- ORATORY AND OFFICE SPACES, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW OFF-PREMISE PARKING LOT LOCATION: TOTALING 980 SPACES FOR CARS AND 28 SPACES FOR MOTORCYCLES FOR SAID EXPANDED U' LO:ATED WEST OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AT THE 3900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 78 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPA:T REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth V 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources W,` 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use Ut 10/ 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: IQAy,S4oAv0 AvE . s.N660S Ta $ orhineree 8 r e/ S. uv . 3fat ST• Aye w• `af/ it 3r, To ZM /Pti v E T,IAfic<o 1CLow 7-Rx 7 M A4641 . RECOMt.ENDATION: DNS MITIGATED DNS fI EIS REVIEV+ED BY: TITLE: Z4,4 Y./C, t(AVOAf$' 6406e, DATE: 7-1 / - V c FORM ##14 1• ENv1KONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEEN REV: EWING DEPARTMENT: LJ .T I (, _ I f" DATE CIRCULATED:JULY 18, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 30, 1985 ECF - 087 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SA-056-85, CU-057-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT: BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PROJECT TITLE: 39th & LIND PARKING AREA AND RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW 7-BUILDING COMPLEX CURRENTLY USED FOR FABRICATION TO CONVERT LARGE PORTIONS TO ELECTRONICS LAB- ORATORY AND OFFICE SPACES, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW OFF-PREMISE PARKING LOT LOCATION: TOTALING 980 SPACES FOR CARS AND 28 SPACES FOR MOTORCYCLES FOR SAID EXPANDED U LOCATED WEST OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AT THE 3900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 78 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPFCT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS MITIGATED DNS J EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: (/T/4/Ty /r/N i DATE: 8 - T — 1S`r FORM #14 e• c\e,k OF I PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RICHARD C. HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 9 206 235-2569 09 TE0 SEPS - J,O BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH May 17, 1985 MAYOR CITY OF FENT0'4 MAY 201985 Mr. Robert Morgan Corporate Manager Rea I Property BU'It T iG,/zoN.INra ,DEPT THE BOEING COMPANY P. 0. Box 3707 M/S 75-66 Seattle, WA 98124-2207 SUBJECT: Street Use Permit, S.W. 41st Street between Valley Parkway and Lind Avenue Dear Bob: The Board of Public Works met May 15, 1985 and the subject request was reviewed. The request was not approved by the Board because it is for an exclu- sive use to a single party and therefore not legal . Further, although the Boeing Company could request a Street Vacation the Board felt it could not support such a petition at this time. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to call . Very truly yours, Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director Chairman/Board Public Works PMP t s S= 0 ITY OF RENT( ' FILE NO(S): SR S054 -X Es, ® `BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT C u - 057 -gS EcF- DP7-YS MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of applications) are to be completed. Please print or type. Attoch additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY FEES Attention: B. D. Zimmerman ADDRES Q REZONE*(FROM TO v.0. Box 3999, MS 89-02 n SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP 1 TEMPORARY PERMIT* Seattle 98124-2499 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* SITE PLAN APPROVAL TELEPHOE N73-5650 n SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL I No. of Cubic Yards: CONFromVARIANCE*TACT PERSON Section: Justification Required NAME Robert D. Scholes , P.E. ESM, INC. 4 ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: 451 S.W. 10th, #106 I 1 SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT Renton 98055 PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT 228-5628 Ei WAIVER Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: IMIMMINNIMINNICV=11.i NAME PLAT NAME: GLACIER PARK COMPANY ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 1011 Western Avenue CD PRELIMINARY CITY Seat h e 98104Z1P El FINAL P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 625-6300 0 Residential Industrial 0 Commercial ED Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS 39th & Land Q TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY Vacant M-P FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: Parking Facility NUMBER OF SPACES: a ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SQ. FT. ACRES AREA: 3,397,680 78.00 TOTAL FEES eliY I-.,r.osais ArruSE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE AI gi".91 APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: JUL 121985 APPLIC TION DETERMINED TO BE. JT.w",01 Accepted BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Incomplete Notification Sent On By: Ini}icls) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: j APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: ZNViLf lb Iat6 0 Accepted QIncomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials) ROUTED TO: Q Building Q Design Eng. EJ Fire Parks 0 Police El Policy Dev. El Traffic Eng. Q Utilities r REVTSRn 1 _L Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). PARCEL A: That portion of Government Lot 31 , Section 36 , Township 23 North, Range 4 East, King County, Washington , lying west of the westerly margin of Lind Avenue and north of the north line of S.W. 43rd Street, EXCEPTING THEREFROM City of Renton road right-of-ways. PARCEL B: That portion of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 36 , Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , King County, Washington, lying north of the north margin of S.W. 43rd Street and east of the east margin of Longacres Parkway, less City of Renton road right-of-way. PARCEL C: Lots 4, 5, and 6 of the Plat of Burlington Northern Industrial Park Renton II as filed for record in Volume ill , page 44 of Plats , Records of King County, Washington. AFFIDAVIT BRUCE D. ZIMMERMAN being duly sworn, declare that I am xx authorized representative to act for the property owner, owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 2 41/4 DAY OF 19 .5. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT Zvi 41-42"*.c.c.. eg Name of Notary ublic)Signature of wner) 2 CO. 62-97 j 9W02,3 P.O. Box 3999, MS 89-02 Address) Address) Seattle, Wa 98124-2499 City) State) (Zip) 773-5650 Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A That portion of Government Lot 31 . Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, King County, Washington, lying west of the westerly margin ofLindAvenueandnorthofthenorthlineofS.W. 43rd Street, EXCEPTING THEREFROM City of Renton road right-of-ways. PARCEL B That portion of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 36, Township 23North, Range 4 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying north of the north margin of S.W. 43rd Street and east of the east margin of Longacres Parkway, less City of Renton road right-of-way. PARCEL C Lots 4, 5, and 6 of the Plat of Burlington Northern Industrial Park Renton II as filed for record in Volume III , page 44 of Plats, Records of King County, Washington. W7:BAC1 CITY OF RENTON i1t1 !/I5 O JUL 12" 1985 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. OF R4 1'>, ECF:k( - Ck 7 -1)51 t% 0 z City of Renton SA- ,) s1p s bS7-8S o MEN Po9 rf SEP'E P ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1.Name of proposed project, if applicable: 39th & LIND PARKING AREA and RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX 2.Name of applicant: Boeing Aerospace Company 3.Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Contact Person: P.O. Box 3999, MS-89-02 Robert D. Scholes, P.E. Seattle, Wa 98124-2499 ESM, INC. Attn: B.D. Zimmerman 451 S.W. 10th, #106 773-5650 Renton, Wa 98055 4.Date checklist prepared: June 28, 1985 228-5628 5.Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department 6.Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): See attached. CITY OF RENTON 11-1 D JUL 12 1985 BUILDING/ZONING 7: Do you have any pli for future additions, expansions, 'urther activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. No plans at this time. 8.List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Environmental Checklist together with an EIS prepared for the filing of the original plat in the late 1970's or early 1980's. 9.Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None, to the best of our knowledge. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Site plan approval ; building permit from City of Renton. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. See attached. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. See attached. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); @ rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Less than 1%. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. See attached. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None Noted 2 - I e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. It is anticipated that approximately 5,000 yards of fill will be imported and approximately 10,000 yards of material will be moved to f. create drainage during the onstr cti.on phase.. ouia erosion occur as a result of clearing, conuction, or use? If so, generally describe. Construction is anticipated to occur during the summer construction season during a period of little or no rain. Steps will be taken to prevent waterborne materials from entering the drainage system and appropriate erosion control measures will be taken to preclude silt laden waters from entering the waterways. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 92% of the site will be covered with asphalt on completion of the construction. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Temporary erosion control measures in compliance with City standards and good construction practice will be taken. 2.AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. See attached. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? None are known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Construction equipment will be maintained in good working condition during the construction phase to mitigate impacts on air quality. Vehicles within the Renton area are required to have emission inspections annually as a condition of licensing, which would mitigate major impacts to the air quality due to this project. 3.WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Springbrook Creek abutts the property to the west. We are informed by the Planning Department that this system is not subject to the Shorelines Permit process of the State of Washington. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Work will occur within 200 feet of the described waters. This work will include clearing, grubbing, grading, paving, striping, and landscaping. See plans for additional information). 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None is proposed at this time. 3 - 4) Will the prc,___al require surface water withdr, is or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. No water withdrawals are proposed. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. See attached. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Grease, oil , dirt, and other materials common to the parking lot environment could enter the surface water system through the storm drain system. These impacts will be mitigated by the use of catch basins and oil separators to reduce the volume and quantity of contamination. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No ground water will be withdrawn due to this proposal . 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The drainage from the parking lot area will be collected to area catch basins , conducted by underground piping to the existing storm drain system within the street and ultimately be discharged into Springbrook Creek. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Materials spilled or discarded onto the parking area could enter the surface water system through the storm drain as a result of parking lot cleaning or be borne by rain water. 4 - d. Proposed measures.to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The installation of catch basins and oil separators will be used to mitigate pollution. Storm drain retention as required by the City of Renton Department of Public Works will also be designed into the system. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: aide maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: ir, cedar, pine, other o Shrubs 1/ o crop or grain pc Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? See attached. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known to exist on the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: See attached. 5.Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known to inhabit the area. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. This site is not a migration route to the best of our knowledge and belief. 5 - i I d. Proposed m___ures to preserve or enhance wildli,,,, .f any: See attached. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. See attached. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: See attached. 7.Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None are anticipated at this time. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None are anticipated at this time. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: See attached. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? See attached. 6 - 1 2) What types and levals of noise would be createo oy or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. See attached. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? See attached. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. The site may have been used for agriculture several years ago, however, since it has been filled and developed into an industrial area that use is now precluded. c. Describe any structures on the site. No structures exist on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Not applicable. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? M-P, Manufacturing Park f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? M-P, Multi-Option g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? No one would reside or work on the completed project since it is a parking area. People would park here to work at the site abutting to the south. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not Applicable. 7 - 1. Proposed me res to ensure the proposal is con :ible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposal is an outright permitted use under the zone and in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units. if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high. middle. or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s). not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. No structures are proposed on the site. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Views in the vicinity would be altered from an existing vacant land to that of a well landscaped parking area. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: See attached. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? See attached. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Because of the directional type of lighting that is proposed, no safety hazard is anticipated nor is it expected to interfere with existing views. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Existing off-site sources of light consist of street lights along 39th, Lind and Raymond Streets. These are not expected to have substantial impacts on the proposal . d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: The design of the luminaires will be such as to control lighting glare impacts due to development. 8 - 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There is a 40-foot pedestrian easement and greenbelt along Sprinbrook Creek , together with a 20-foot pedestrian access easeement from the westerly terminus of S.W. 39th Street to the greenbelt provided in the plat. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None are known to exist. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None are known to exist on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not Applicable. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. See attached. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? See attached. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? See attached. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe indicate whether public or private). See attached. 9 - i e. Will the prof___ use (or occur in the immediate n iity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. See attached f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. See attached g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: If additional striping on Lind is necessary to facilitate the added traffic, this would be accomplished at the time of construction of the facility. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project would require additional fire and traffic protection. No other additional services are anticipated. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services. if any. None are proposed at this time. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, gripP refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic sys em, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity would be provided by Puget Sound Power and Light. Water service would be provided by the City of Renton. No off-site improvements to the system are anticipated to be necessary. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Ay Name Printed: 10 - 1-7r i .- -r_ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION A. BACKGROUND 6. The phasing for completion of the conversion of the office and laboratory structure will be done in two phases, to be completed prior to December 31 , 1985. Construction on the parking lot is anticipated to commence upon issuance of a building permit with target dates for completion of paving by October 15, 1985 and completion of the landscaping by December 1 , 1985. 10. Conditional Use Permit; Site Plan Approval ; Building Permits from City of Renton. II . That portion of the site that is generally known as the Renton Benaroya complex is currently occupied by seven large structures that are currently used for fabrication, storage, and office space. Proposed changes will convert portions of this facility to include approximately 71 ,000 square feet of electronics laboratory space, 247,500 square feet of office space, 297,300 square feet of fabrication area, and 670, 100 square feet of storage area. Due to the changes in use it is anticipated that construction of a parking lot in Parcel C as noted on the legal description will provide 980 parking spaces for automobiles, together with approximately 28 parking spaces for motorcycles. Raymond Avenue is currently gated off and in the process of this conversion of use, both Raymond Avenue between 39th and 41st will be opened as a traveled way to facilitate access to the Longacres Parkway. When this street is opened approximately 29 parking spaces currently available will be lost. (See Exhibits "A" and "B" for existing and proposed uses. Improvements to the new parking area will consist of grading, installation of peripheral sidewalks, installation of a drainage system, illumination, landscaping and irrigation, as required by Code. 12. The site is located in the south portion of Renton. It is bounded on the west by the Longacres Parkway and Springbrook Creek, on the north by S.W. 39th Street, on the east by Lind Avenue and on the south by S.W. 43rd Street. See attached vicinity map, Exhibit "D") . B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1 . EARTH c. The site was filled several years ago. The fill material was generally glacial till of the Alderwood series. There is a small area that is unfilled currently, but will be filled during grading operations. The area of the existing industrial park has been filled, graded, paved, and no additional grading is anticipated in this area. 2. AIR a. During construction there will be an increase in dust and exhaust emissions from construction equipment. 2- After construction is completed approximately 2,000 additional vehicle trips per day will be generated from use on the site. Total traffic generation from the proposal is estimated at 5,084 trips per day. Emissions from these vehicles could be expected to be of the same type and substance which would normally be associated with these types of uses and are expected to be within the ambient air requirements of the City of Renton. 3. WATER a. Surface: 5. Discussions with the City of Renton indicate that the 100 year flood plain encroaches onto the site near the corner of S.W. 41st Street and the Longacres Parkway. (See site plan) . 6. Grease, oil , dirt, and other materials common to the parking lot environment could enter the surface water system through the storm drain system. These impacts will be mitigated by the use of catch basins and oil separators to reduce the volume and quantity of contamination from the proposed parking area. No change in the discharge of materials from the paved areas of the Benaroya portion of the complex is expected. 4. PLANTS b. As previously stated, no physical changes with the exception of opening the street are proposed for the Benaroya portion of the site. The portion that the new parking areas will be constructed on will be cleared and grubbed in its entirety, however, since this area has been previously cleared and filled, most vegetation on the site has come up volunteer from wind blown seed. d. No changes in existing landscaping are proposed for the Benaroya portion of the complex. In those areas where no parking areas are proposed, landscaping will be in conformance with City of Renton requirements, including 5% of the site for landscape plantings, together with an additional 2% wildlife landscaping. In accordance with City of Renton requirements, all new landscaped areas will be irrigated. 5. ANIMALS d. 2% of the new parking area site will be landscaped in a manner to enhance wildlife habitation. No outward physical changes are proposed with regard to the existing facility. 3- 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. With regard to the new parking areas, energy requirements will include the illumination of the site during hours of darkness. It is anticipated that after working hours, the total site lighting will be reduced by 50% using time controls in an effort to reduce consumption. The change in the existing complex to include more office and laboratory space will increase the energy demand by the overall complex. c. As noted in (a) above, it is proposed to double circuit the lighting system so that after working hours the total amount of energy used would be reduced by approximately 50% providing only sufficient lighting for security purposes. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. 2) As a matter of general policy, all applicable measures are taken by the Company to protect the health of its employees at all times. b. Noise I ) The existing Benayora complex currently takes approximately 1 ,563 parking spaces. With the conversion of the use of the buildings together with the additional parking an increase in parking noise from the additional 1 ,000 parking spaces is anticipated. In addition, since there is a rail spur along the south line of the proposed parking site, and an additional spur between the boundaries of Lots 5 and 6 some railroad noise can be anticipated depending on the frequency of the train service to other buildings in the area. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. Land uses to the south, east, and west are currently office and industrial uses. The property to the north of the proposed site is currently vacant land. b. The proposed parking site may have been used for agriculture several years ago as is true of the Benaroya complex, however, given the filling and development into industrial use that has taken place, that use is now precluded. c. The portion in Parcel "C" currently has streets and utilities stubbed to the property and has been filled. The portion within the Benaroya complex consists of seven tilt-slab concrete structures which generally have a warehouse appearance on the exterior. d. No structures are proposed to be demolished. i . 2,848 people are expected to work in the complex at peak employment in April of 1986. 4- 10. AESTHETICS c. The proposed parking area will be landscaped and buffered with landscape berms, thus reducing the visual impact of the paving areas from the street. These mounds will be landscaped in compliance with City requirements. As this landscaping matures, visual impacts would be further reduced by the density of the landscaping berms. 11 . LIGHT AND GLARE a. The parking lot will be illuminated during the hours of use. Maximum intensity is estimated to be 1/2 ft. candle. The illuminaires will be of such a design as to direct the lighting onto the parking areas and to minimize the effects of glare to off-site properties. No changes are anticipated within the existing complex. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. The site is bounded by Longacres Parkway on the west, S.W. 43rd Street on the south, Lind Avenue on the east, and S.W. 39th on the north. In addition, internal circulation is provided by S.W. 4lst Street and Raymond Avenue. The opening of access along Raymond Avenue will open the option of traffic entering or exiting the site from any one of the peripheral streets. 41st Street and 43rd Street provide access to the on and off ramps from SR 167 (the Valley Freeway) . Traffic west along 43rd Street would provide access to 1-5 and traffic north along Lind would provide access to 1-405 to Grady Way. b. The site is currently served by Metro Route #247. A new route #I63 is proposed to go into effect later in 1985. c. The proposed project will result in total parking spaces of 2,542. In the process of this proposed development, approximately 29 parking spaces will be lost (see Exhibit "C") . d. The proposed development will increase the traffic in the vicinity by approximately 2,000 trips per day. The opening of Raymond Avenue to public traffic will act to disperse the concentrations giving a variety of alternatives for access to abutting arterials. Some channelization may be appropriate at the intersection of S.W. 39th Street and Lind to facilitate left turns from Lind onto S.W. 39th Street. e. Railroad spurs currently service all areas of the site on easements which were drafted with the original plats. Utilization of these spurs as a result of this proposed development is not anticipated. Impacts on other transportation alternatives would be expected to be similar to those generated by any development of this type. i 1 5- f. Approximately 2,000 additional vehicle trips per day for a total of 5,084 vehicle trips per day could be expected to be generated on the site with full utilization of the parking areas. Peak volumes are expected to occur between 6:00 and 8:00 a.m. and 3:00 to 5:00 p.m. when people arrive at and depart from the facility. g. The occupant proposes that upon completion of the facility, if additional striping on Lind is necessary, this would be accomplished during the time of construction after consultation with the Traffic Engineering Division of the City of Renton Public Works Department. Additionally, there are ongoing discussions with the City concerning additional traffic signals in the area. It is proposed that these mitigating measures be worked out with the Public Works Department. 3. RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX STRG STRG 21K 41KICE 11K OFF 85K OFFICE 75K 33.5K 7 7 81 5 o 7-81-7 t 1 r 1 CO f it 1 (J / 1 r I ' 181 1 lM11 r S. V. 411i 4TIISST V 0 J Q?L JU aL J GIL r FAB a 145.3K 104K STRG 70K FAB IN STRG STRG STRG 16.7K 114K STRG 98K STRG 4 38K FAB 82K FAB w 2K OFFICE r 61• J v L. 337.4K r L2 11_1-1 fi n_____._...__r-Th-----fi r r----L___n 0:=)i7.81.1 7.81.2 7.81.3 s.w. 411g ITIISST SITE PLAN 6 EXISTING ICAIS I MOMS I I ! , I/ i---)C t 1 1 1 r '".", REN i ON BENAROYA COMPLEX OFFICE OFFICE LAB OFFICE 96K 75K 21K 41K OFFICE I ' jam' 33.5K 7814 7 7815 U o o 1 414 O i 1 O r l mn []_ r 1 , 7 e1 s , 1 cn f 1 III. 4111 1 ITREIT u 1r; 1.) 1 LAB 50K LJ Li 1 ' L.) G=T_ U FAB i 145.3K STRG 53K STRG 16.7K 165K STRG 98K STRG r- STRG STRG 82K FAB 2K OFFICE e F a V J FAB 337.4K 0 70K 7.81.1 7B12 r1813 it____J--t r) r----r—t-----n r 1----1----n (2=21H s i. IlU ITIIIIT SITE PLANdi, PROPOSED ICAII i NOMI or 1 P1 !I i _a [..... . i . r- i ,1 1 EXHIBIT "C" BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PARKING SPACE CALCULATIONS 13u i I_d ing Use Pro 5esi Are_a larking Spaces Lab 71 ,000 SF 71 Office 247,500 SF 1,237.5 Fabrication 297,300 SF 297.3 Storage 670, 100 SF 446.73 Total = 2,052.53 2053 spaces required. Spaces Provided, Existing Facility: 1 ,534 spaces New Facility 980 spaces Motorcycles 28 spaces Total Spaces 2,542 spaces W is BAC A 1 tarn s1 wY w 4, sw teeth 40 b—WO LONGACRES U RAC TRACK w III; \ Q I cSW27thST ri hui 15W : 3 ST. v O J Z J W Y SW 34th ST 1.. .d._ c7COill O 1- J 1 SW 38th ST 'M 39th ST J 1 Ja SW 43!t I ST / SITE SW 43rd ' ST T VICINITY MAP Not To Scale EXHIBIT "D" 4 M CITY OF RENTON area Sterner Lighting Systems F.Li \V mi roadway99YrFiOmall al JUL 12 1985 walkway Executive II BulLDING/ZONING OF The EXECUTIVE II is a classic design nect, capacitor, ballast, socket, lamp The fact that EXECUTIVE II is one of with outstanding lighting efficiency. and hydro-formed reflector in a single, our top selling luminaires is not sur- It offers precise light control, plus hinged and removable module. prising. It provides a total lighting Sterner's Unitized Ballast/Reflector All this inside a luminaire with the package flexible enough to meet many Assembly for easy installation and strong, clean, rectilinear lines that of the most demanding lighting maintenance. This is a complete sys- make it versatile enough to fit many requirements. tern, including primary quick discon- settings. i r 3 r ram 1 i Short Form Ordering Guide To facilitate easy ordering we have provided all of the information you need on these two pages (2 and 3) to order our "standard" Executive II luminaire. Pole and Finish selections have been abbreviated to include only the sizes and finishes that are most in demand. To order, just follow the three time-saving steps shown at right. IMPORTANT! If more data on materials, options, finishes or pole sizes is required, please see complete listings in Section 8 Poles or Section 14 Color Chart. ORDERING INFORMATION Obtain the catalog number for the luminaire series which fits your requirements. Select, in sequence, a code for each feature from those listed in the format illustrated below. EXAMPLE: mQ v,V p v co vo r v QQ,Ov ET 20 NOTE A NOTE B NOTE C SPECIFY NOTE 120 277 See SECTION 8 for 25 LAMP D 208 480 pole selection or WATTAGE 240 VND' SECTION 12 for brackets. NOTE A NOTE C NOTE D AO—Clear Patterned Glass P— Photoelectric Control Receptacle M — Mercury Vapor standard) - AC—Fused Terminal Block H — Metal Halide A—Clear Glass HS—House Side Cut-off Shield S—High Pressure Sodium TF—Tilt Fitter I— Incandescent NOTE B N—Options Not Desired 10 —Single 28—2 @ 180° 29—2 @ 90° 32-3@120° 39—3 @ 90° 49—4 @ 90° Voltage Not Determined WIND LOAD RATING TABLE Luminaire Luminaire Number& L J Size Spacing C] (1 I —II 10 28 29 32 39 49 Single 2 @29 90, L 10 ri 20 3 5 5 6 6 7 25 4 8 8 10 10 14 2 @ 180°3 @ 90" 4 @ 90° 28 39 49 r, 1 Determine luminaire requirements. Select, in sequence, the code for each luminaire feature from those listed under step number one. Example:ET 25 AO 10 P 400 S 120 2 Determine pole height, shape and material. Find the corresponding code in the chart under step num- ber two and add it to luminaire code. Example: ET 25 AO 10 P 400 S 120 RTS05-H- Note: For wall bracket information see Section 12) 3 Determine luminaire and pole finish. Select desired finish from chart under step number three and add it to luminaire code. Example: ET 25 AO 10 P 400 S 120 RTS05-H-N 2 POLES Poles include anchor base (surface hinged bases for 15' and 20' aluminum poles), prewiring, anchor bolts, and a baked enamel or hard-coat anodic finish. 15' 20' 25' 30' 40' Round Tapered RTA06-C- RTA11-C- RTA13-B- RTA16-B- RTA23-B- Aluminum load rating load rating load rating 10 load rating 9 load rating 14 16 10 RTA14-B- RTA17-B- load rating 15 load rating 14 Square SSA18-E- SSA25-E- SSA27-D- SSA28-D- Straight load rating load rating load rating 14 load rating 14 N.A. Aluminum 8 8 SSA19-E- SSA26-E- load rating load rating 16 27 Round Tapered RTS03-H- RTSO4-H- RTS05-H- RTS06-H- RTS08-H- Steel load rating load rating load rating load rating load rating 18 27 37 32 30 Square STS03-P- STSO4-P- STS05-P- STS06-P- STS12-P- Tapered load rating load rating load rating load rating load rating Steel 46 30 26 23 16 I 3 MATERIAL FINISHES Baked enamel:An electro-statically applied acrylic finish deposited on the metal and baked in an oven to harden and cure the coating. Anodic:An extremely hard finish indigenous to the metal. Baked Enamel Anodic Light Bronze (311) A M Medium Bronze (312) B N Dark Bronze(313) C P Black E 0 Natural Aluminum G R If a finish coat is not required, insert the following code for the type of pole specified: AD—Red Oxide Primer For Steel AC—Brushed Satin Finish For Aluminum If the color or finish is not known, insert the following in the catalog number: NK—Not Known DIMENSIONS Recommended Luminaire Standard Mounting Wattage Size Arm Height EXECUTIVE II 20 up to 200 watts 16"x20"x6" 2"x4"-8"7'6"to 20' EXECUTIVE II 25 up to 400 watts 20"x25"x8" 21/4"x6"-12" 15'to 40' Mechanical Features Unitized ballast/reflector system. Hinged and removable as a unit. Easy access for installation and mainte- nance. Thermal and impact tempered glass lens. Extruded aluminum arm with galvanized steel threaded tie rods. Continuous extruded aluminum lens frame with tubular silicone gasketing for weathertight seal. Photometric Flexibility The EXECUTIVE II takes lamps of 70 to 400 watts, depending on luminaire size. Providing excellent photo- metric control, a die-formed, semi-specular reflector system, except in 200-watt size, are field-adjustable for selection of standard I.E.S. patterns II and III. (Photometric data is found in SECTION 14, Technical Informa- tion.) Designed and manufactured to meet or exceed U.L. and N.E.C. requirements, all fixtures bear the I.B.E.W. and U.L. label. Options photoelectric control receptacle fused terminal block single or duplex weatherproof receptacle lumi- naires can be wall mounted (see SECTION 12) baked enamel or anodic hard coat finishes available in a wide range of colors (see SECTION 14) pole materials: aluminum, steel, concrete, wood, wood-laid pole cross-sections: round, square, hexagonal, octagonal pole profiles: straight or tapered, depending on lumi- naire specifications (For specific details on poles, see SECTION 8, Poles) WOODLITE styles available (See SECTION 11, WOODLITE) UNITIZED BALLAST/REFLECTOR ASSEMBLY is hinged and removable for quick connect and disconnect. Canopy Housing formed aluminum extruded aluminum L 91 Lampholder Grip-Tice" mogul socket Gasket weather-seal silicone Ill Lens Tie Rods tempered glass galvanized steel Door Frame extruded Ialuminum IIA Arm is) cross-section Optional Adjustable Tilt Fitter r The Total Lighting Package, a a Sterner Exclusive iLeaveittoSternertobuildthismanyexclusive features into one good looking and functional fixture. The EXECUTIVE II is truly a total package, offering outstanding energy efficiency, long lasting perform- ance, easy and economical installation and mainte- nance. Only Sterner offers all these unique features in one clean, flexible design: Efficient Photometric Performance: Cut-off Types II and III field adjustable. Specifically designed for the energy efficient 150, 200, 250, and 400 watt high pressure sodium lamps. See Section 14 for complete, accurate, supported data on all HID lamps. t • 1 ( _ i 4 r'i . t % I z i i i f NI, •••••••".....kse 4''!-,- --. D „ 1---:•:\'''' t— cal.: 0 PIA gi Automatic Primary Disconnect: Operates when UBR—Unitized Ballast/Reflector Assembly: Corn- door is opened—includes fusing for additional plete optical and electric components are hinged safety.and removable as a unit for easy installation and maintenance. Ballast also removable as a unit. S-34450 ill UNDERWRITERS, LABORATORIES i N c® 71 LISTED ELECTRIC FIXTURE ISSUE NO. D-29,588 SUITABLE FORs. WET LOCATIONS RI TED IN U.S.A. iit Extruded Aluminum Housing: One-piece miter U.L.: Entire fixture listed "Suitable for use in wet bend sidewall construction, with canopy perma- location." nently sealed and welded in place. Entire housing factory finished with Electro-Statically applied, oven baked, textured enamel finish. R i e5.44 1..` ,. ' L\ v, i ,--' ' 6-----' Maintenance Without Tools: Complete mainte- Sealed Optical: One-piece hydro-formed semi- nance may be performed without the use of tools. specular reflector is hinged and sealed against a one piece silicone gasket. I j z Tempered Glass: Both heat and impact resistant. Extruded Aluminum Door Frame Assembly: Accu- Available with clear or highly efficient, slightly rately mitered, and permanently secured with ex- diffusing, clear crystal glass. truded internal corner keys. I wa A, 2r. 4Y s Q• it ti r Ilk e.-.• . -' 0' •- cit.__ . —.... , '. . S L l ` ` 1 iI sr' t 1 C,A40. N , , ;,,..... fror Computer Service: Sterner can provide a com- puterized layout service from verifying your cal- culations to providing a complete point-by-point project print out. kria,„---,-,..!- r-- ii: 14• Emm• rm. frYgo...••• 11...-- gm...... I Y 111. 1* dillil III. Ir I dia i I, i ‘ '' , .." IA d6ai I • ' lir i .. •.;: tiv: tot ,, 1. 1. ••:.: l'""'- 1:',-,-' W.,- r ' 6'• . 0 i le,.. pri• i, " ii •. -'.. _ Y:-:-.*-.;-!........;•_ i,'. j' - iiiii. 4311' p- 4 t .. 11 . ,• i :•.,,,,...,..... i t c. i. .... 1 al .. Ii ' d': i.! 5•' 6,-;,,.....,:; v '. f. , i.•••••..:..: i1::.- 1. 1. iMil 1 k'-', 71, 7si i v- • r.': 1•,,.....'• : 4 • I.i.."- •-•• 1'' * i n... . I. :' IrI, 1, III ,.. i . i' Vr-` • , 1 ' II,' 1' '.'. L— tIN: k_ Mit: IT‘ 111 II ; b• r,- 14: - I I . i i 1 . I; 1— A. I , 7liki., 4 ....- r"."' i 1 I ) • 411, o ork, , I I'.. 4 1 VO1/4 11;.- NA.,, Ir' Cr \ 1411 '. .. 11111if . ' 1 I6. 7„;,... .,„, N.;., I I1 „.: 4, .. r......-. . , 11. 41406_ 42. ill.; t:.; jp• I f s. t Ik.__... I 0# . tliAlk I I. t'''' - '•, • jk••••• ikl . ,', .•,,' . . 4. 1 . 7.. li'I31 , . 7..- t offl,, 1011 . ' 1 44'. 1 ' 1 ' L '•I .. I I° lit:i ii., i: , I , 41,. . '.,'(• z:,...., 1 i . i.... ; ': • .. •. 1 ' 1 . L ,, 11,, ,,...,,, M. 4. 9gli3Vi i A 11• 1.. ,. ..— 3 ..;'). . i pn, p____... I , - - ! ) 7;...„,, , ,:-.--:: ti„, 4 -,. - ., .-- i , irl .•'- f. 1 '• i '''; — '....' -- -- 1 i. !„....„.. ,. :....._,,.. .. I' , .,: 11 .. rchr ,,, lez. , 0 ' . o----'-` - 710..—" NI, h ' - OP: - wireforNitr.... ti , '' z . 1 ' 1:: 1 ligiej4• ) fr 7.--V- .I 11Q../11(••4111, .1.il, -Ii.../„.9ilk, alb''..• , • .4 r,,, 1.8 ' 144 4 4 N 4 •. f~i t tyl ram`it tr 1 i f ..•• 4r• --j• 1 - A• i . J-''erg - -• a J tee .i. I r • r. ACC i.' ' .-'A" i•,,:y --%7,ct:L;;- •4 ..,- 7: - -a-t .i - • ' 2:::::::-1 r*4A,, i' - _. 1 SAMPLE SPECIFICATION Executive II The luminaire sidewalls shall be mitre-bend con- is opened,the ballast primary circuit is broken,there- struction from a single piece of aluminum extru- by allowing the fixture to be serviced without shock sion, alloy 6063-T6. Crowned aluminum sheet can- hazard. Lamp socket to have nickel plated current opy spot-welded and sealed to housing. Finish on carrying parts with lamp grip. Ballast components housing shall be Lens encased with mounted on a separate panel having quick-release extruded aluminum door frame sealed with a sili- fasteners. Ballast shall be capable of starting cone gasket. Door frame assembly shall be remov- type of lamp of watts at_voltage down able. The door to be hinged with stainless steel pins to —20°F. The 200°C, 600-volt insulated wiring shall and retained with quick release safety latch. Sealed be installed between the ballast components and the reflector system to prevent entrance of dust or mois- socket. The flat lens shall be thermal and impact ture. Reflector is precision hydro-formed aluminum, tempered plate glass. The standard arm assembly chemically brightened and anodized to semi-specular shall be a rectangular aluminum extrusion complete finish. Reflector system is factory pre-set to provide with non-slip tie rod channels serving as a compres- standard I.E.S. distribution patterns II and Ill, and sion member with two threaded and galvanized steel field adjustable by socket location. Reflector system tie rods and lock nuts in tension between pole and hinged and latched to gasketed door frame for easy luminaire. The luminaire shall bear the listing mark of cleaning or removal. A fused disconnect shall be fur- Underwriters Laboratory. "Fixtures suitable for wet nished inside the fixture so that when the door frame locations." STeRNeR LIGHTING SYSTEMS INCORPORATED Winsted, Minnesota 55395 (612) 485-2141jalMinneapolisPhone (612) 473-1251 College Point(Long Island), New York 11356 (212) 358-5655 Printed in U.S.A. I • I • y - ESM inc. A CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEY, AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT CONSULTING FIRM July 10, 1985 CITY OP RENTON 1-61f Hearing Examiner JUL 12 1985 1-1 City of Renton BUILDING/ZONING DEPT.200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Wa 98055 Re: Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Approval Boeing Aerospace Company Dear Sir: In support of the application of the Boeing Aerospace Company for site plan approval and a Conditional Use Permit for the site bounded by the Longacres Parkway on the west, S.W. 41st on the south, Lind Avenue on the east, and S.W. 39th on the north, we offer the following information for your consideration: A• faurgjLe I ve .P.IAD. The proposed use is compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, current Zoning Ordinances and requirements of the City of Renton. The buildings in question are constructed on site. At this time the proposed Conditional Use Permit will add necessary parking to facilitate the conversion of a portion of the buildings into office space and laboratory areas. No changes to the outside features of the buildings are proposed. The original construction was in compliance with the requirements of the existing Comprehensive Plan. The current zoning for the property in question is M-P. The proposed uses, as shown in Exhibit "B" are an outright permitted use under the existing zoning. B. DSVMDJIYA.04 The conversion of this property from warehousing to the proposed use will provide employment for additional members of the community with the associated increase in the business levels in the community, increasing the income to the City by taxes and, in general , enhancing the economic and social environment of the City of Renton. 451 Southwest 10th Street Suite 106 Renton Washington,98055 206)228-5628 Hearing Examiner July 10, 1985 Page Two C. Effgct .op .Adjgcgnt ,eropecti, As noted above, the property is currently zoned M-P. Existing uses in the general vicinity are of an industrial nature or vacant land. Additionally, butting lands are zoned M-P which means that the proposed use is compatible with the existing uses or possible uses on vacant lands in the vicinity. D. tJb l tY The proposed use is compatible with the uses in the neighborhood in that the existing and proposed uses in the vicinity are M-P and the proposed use is an outright permitted use in the M-P zoning. E. Fark it)g The additional parking which is proposed to be constructed is specifically required under paragraph C of the City of Renton Zoning Code concerning offstreet parking. Exhibit "C" of the attachments to the Environmental Checklist provides a breakdown of the proposed uses within various structures and the associated parking spaces required by the Code. It should be noted that 2,053 spaces are required and 2,542 spaces are provided. F. The Boeing Aerospace Company proposes to open access along Raymond Avenue South to enhance vehicular and pedestrian access through and around the site. This will provide access to S.W. 43rd Street, to the Longacres Parkway, S.W. 4lst Street, and Lind Street, as well as direct access to Lind Street from S.W. 39th Street. G. i s e, .G l a rg Potential noise, light, and glare impacts are reviewed in the Environmental Checklist in some detail . Potential noise will be from traffic to and from the site, which will occur in the morning and afternoon hours as employees arrived at and depart from the parking areas. Given the industrial use of the area, this is not expected to create a potential noise that would exceed those allowed by appropriate Noise Ordinances. i Hearing Examiner July 10, 1985 Page Three It should be noted that light and glare will be controlled by use of directional luminaires within the parking areas and it should be further noted that the lighting system will be double circuited to allow 50 percent of the lumminaires to be turned off during times when a level of 1/2' candle is not required. The result will be that except at times when employees are on the site, approximately 50 percent of the luminaires will be turned off to reduce glare and save energy. This level of lighting will provide lighting for security purposes only. H. . .[id. qWnq Within the existing facility no changes in the landscape are proposed. Within the area that is proposed to be constructed as a new parking area, 5% landscaping or more will be provided. Additionally, 2% of the site will be landscaped in such a manner to enhance wildlife habitat, all in conformance with the requirements of the appropriate Ordinances of the City of Renton. 1 . Acccssor.y .U4e;s No accessory uses, as defined by Code, are proposed under this proposal . J. Corivgr.slop The existing structures are being converted from mostly storage and warehouse facilities to increase office and electronics laboratory uses. This application for the Conditional Use Permit and site plan approval of the parking area is being made in compliance with the requirements of the City of Renton Code. KK. Pub l t Fr.ei eltts The proposed improvement requires no improvements to existing public facilities, utilities, and services and no public improvements are anticipated to be required. The Boeing Aerospace Company is currently working with the Traffic Division to provide additional signalization in the general vicinity of the site and has proposed to provide striping and left turn pockets should they be necessary at the intersection of S.W. 39th and Lind Avenue to facilitate left turn movements into the parking areas. a Hearing Examiner July 10, 1985 Page Four Based on the above, we feel that the proposed Conditional Use Permit should be granted in that it is in compliance with each and every requirement of the City of Renton Code with regard to Conditional Use Permits, provides a major benefit to the economic well being of the community, is in strict compliance with the requirements of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code of the City of Renton and is, in fact, an outright permitted use for this property. Very truly yours, r.-Z& , INC. ROBERT D. SCHOLES, P.E. President II j` 4]='; " Irani 11Crow mpany " 5601 Sixth Avenue South P.O. Box 80326 Seattle, Washington 98108 July 3, 1985 J U L 9 - 1985 206/762-4750 Boeing Aerospace Company E S , INC, Facilities Department P. 0. Box 3999, MS 89-02 Seattle, Washington 98124 Attention: Mr. Bruce D. Zimmerman Re: Letter of Authority Gentlemen: It is our understanding that in connection with your ground lease development of the S. W. 39th Street parking lot, owned by Burlington Northern Railroad, you intend to file a master application, a conditional use permit, site plan approval , and environmental checklist, with the City of Renton. The property with which we are concerned was formerly called Benaroya Business Park - Renton and is currently owned by Pacific Northwest Group A. The legal description of this property is attached as Exhibit A. As a condition of filing the above documents, it is our understanding that the owner or authorized representative of the owner must sign the applications. This letter hereby authorizes Mr. Bruce D. Zimmerman, Facilities Department, Boeing Aerospace Company, to act on authority of Pacific Northwest Group A only with regard to the applications noted above, to be submitted to the City of Renton. Very truly yours, PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP A, a joint entur / r1/171-1-- Bruce E. Hosford/ Partner CITY OF REt4TON rirT,P l'i 11 sfl 0 JUL 121985 ' BUILDING/ZONING DEPT, I i . ill Glacier Park Company REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT A SUBSIDIARY OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC. June 27, 1985 Boeing Aerospace Company Facilities Department P. O. Box 3999, MS 89-02 Seattle, Washington 98124 Attention: Mr. Bruce D. Zimmerman Re: Letter of Authority Gentlemen: It is our understanding that in connection with your ground lease development of the S. W. 39th Street parking lot, you intend to file a master application, a conditional use permit, site plan approval , and environmental checklist, with the City of Renton. The property in question, which is currently held in fee ownership by Burlington Northern Railroad Properties Inc. concerns lots 4 (portion thereof) , 5, and 6 of the Burlington Northern Industrial Park of Renton, Division II , as filed for record in Volume III , page S 42-44 of Plats, Records of King County. As a condition of filing the above documents, it is our understanding that the owner or authorized representative of the owner must sign the applications. This letter hereby authorizes Mr. Bruce D. Zimmerman, Facilities Department, Boeing Aerospace Company, to act on authority of the Glacier Park Company in its capacity on behalf of the owner in fee title of the above described property with regard to the applications noted above, to be submitted to the City of Renton. Very truly yours, GLACIER PARK COMPANY on behalf of Burlington Northern Properties Inc. By 14:Z:: ames Warren Cook Sr. Corporate Counsel cc: ESM, Inc. Myrna Brune 2.5.33 1011 Western Avenue, Suite 700 • Seattle, Washington 98104 • 206 625-6300 CITY OF RENTQN1-in 11 13itJUL121985 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. A NDIN& OF FILE FILE TITLE 111billifrild:27/de 44.01 46111440tie 41. 46,,4,8',..... k. 114t, c 1:t 4 4it.4,41"''. 1..'114 II, t• 1/2.. , r t.,. 1'i\ bk z., 4 114., 1 JF R4,1P BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR 09 co MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0917c• SEPS0,0 BARBAF A Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR August 7, 1985 William S. Fetterley Austin Company 800 S.W. 16th Street Renton, Washington 98055 RE: SA-038-85/Boeing Computer Office Building Approval Dear Mr. Fetterley: The above site plan request for the Boeing Computer Office Building located on the southwest corner S.W. 16th Street and Lind Avenue S.W. vas approved by the Hearing Examiner on July 8, 1985. His decision became final at 5 p.m. on July 22, 1985. The site plan approval is considered final . At this point you will continue with building permit process. incerely, roger J. Blaylock toning Administrator f'.JB;rjb a 1 11 1 I 1 I 1 a BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY A Division of The Boeing Company P.O.Box 3999 Seattle,Washington 98124-2499 July 30, 1985 2-4100-BDZ-458 City of Renton Municipal Building CT; Cs" ' 200 Mill Avenue South l Renton, Washington 98055 111 Attention:Mr. Roger J. Blaylock 1985 Zoning Administrator vIZ iryG ur'. L._ Subject: Boeing R. B. Complex S. W. 41st Street and Lind Avenue S.W. Reference: Letter dated May 30, 1985 Roger J. Blaylock to John S. Murdoch, Same Subject Gentlemen: As required in your letter, referenced above, Boeing is transmitting herewith four (4) copies of a traffic study that has been completed by the firm of Wm. E. Popp and Associates. The study was based on planning data developed by Boeing for the proposed use and occupancy of the R. B. Complex, which was furnished to the city by W. E. Bowden and M. A. Schultz on May 31, 1985. Boeing also agreed to provide the installation of signals to control traffic at the intersection of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 41st Street. We anticipate approval of funding early in 1986 and will initiate design and construction activities when funding is approved. We are currently waiting for a public hearing scheduled between August 21 and August 28, 1985, relative to an application for a building permit to construct a parking lot on the South side of S. W. 39th Street, East of Lind Avenue S.W., and for approval of conditional use of the changes to the R. B. Complex proposed by Boeing. (Permit Application No. SA-056-85) We believe the enclosed traffic report completes the requirement identified in your prior letter of May 30, 1985. Please address any questions on this matter to: BOE/AW r i r City of Renton 2- 2-4100-BDZ-458 Boeing Aerospace Company Bruce D. Zimmerman, Mail Stop 89-02 Post Office Box 3999 Seattle, WA 98124-2499 Mr. Zimmerman may be reached at telephone 773-5650. Sincerely, BOEING A • OSPACE COMPANY Z‘ l: et??4,evee..______ W. E. Bowden Director of Facilities Enclosures: (4) Copies of Traffic Study cc: Ronald G. Nelson, Director Building & Zoning Department Richard Houghton Director of Public Works BDZ:dc oil C!7 'x Cci c‘!? i:‘ 5:‘-'‘‘\ V9r)ga5 c3,,;LU\1vv 1" f'>27/ iiM: RENTC' BUILDING & ZONING DEPA' riENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 1187 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-056-85, CU-057-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT : BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PROJECT TITLE : 39th & LIND PARKING AREA AND RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX. APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW 7-BUILD1NG BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF LLPgqROJAAETTCTRR: COMPLEXXXCCCCEURRRENTLLSY USED FOR TTFAACCBRILCATTION TO CONVERT LARGE POORICONFRE&EPAROINGSLOTBTJTALINGA980 SPACESSFOREQRSNANDO ISPR S F h MOTORCYCLESLFOR SAID EXPANDED USE. LOCATION :IOCATFD WEST OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AT THE 3900 BLOCK. TO : IPUI,LIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/31/85 ENGINEERING DIVISION E] TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON JULY 30, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Or71-iry ,Eivc./n14'42'/t\JG El APPROVED I ! APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS IE NOT APPROVED 1 UTILITY APPROVALSURIECT TO j LATE COMERS AGREEMENT - WATER ND LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • SEWER No GL.,,L )14--// SYSTEM IEYELOPMENT COPSE - WATER5 SYSTEM IEYELIPMENT CHARGE • SEWER KO SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CIikRGE - WATER No 1 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE • SEWER ,/p APPROVD WATER KAN DES 4Ares2 w AI i eiT&l5ioNi (2 0.11ac'D fa Co i' Peen./ APPROVED :EWER PLO NO 400 (D5&I'c& 1404,44ir /16coC4770.ws A7 ac.0 C • to ioT$ APPROVED FIRE MANI LEMONS ye5 IT FIRE DEPT. FILE FM AIMS NI) 0 DATE : SIGNATURE OF IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 A3(41V Tti*1rii.? .w +ram tit; M y ... L . g__* _..1;.4 ro130`,c:)it is 0liaeZ 1 CITY OF RENTON r.nvIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH«I JUL 12,; 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C L I DF1'FLO M POLICY r)FPT DAT: CIRCULATED:JULY 18, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 30, 1985 ECF - 087 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SA-056-85, CU-057-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL , CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPONENT: BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PROJECT TITLE: 39th & LIND PARKING AREA AND RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW 7-BUILDING COMPLEX CURRENTLY USED FOR FABRICATION TO CONVERT LARGE PORTIONS TO ELECTRONICS LAB- ORATORY AND OFFICE SPACES, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW OFF-PREMISE PARKING LOT LOCITION: TOTALING 980 SPACES FOR CARS AND 28 SPACES FOR MOTORCYCLES FOR SAID EXPANDED U LCCATEQ WEST OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AT THE 3900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 78 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPAI-J REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADERUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS 1 MITIGATED DNS I EIS REVIEW=D BY: 31 ///01s&-3--\ TITLE: gS(14P--,-464.,,tRi DATE: 7 3 61 R 5— FORM #14 d ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: c-Ve CS DATE CIRCULATED:JULY 18, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 30, 1985 ECF - 087 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SA-056-85, CU-057-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROFONENT: BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PROJECT TITLE: 39th & LIND PARKING AREA AND RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW 7-BUILDING CCMPLEX CURRENTLY USED FOR FABRICATION TO CONVERT LARGE PORTIONS TO ELECTRONICS LAB- ORATORY AND OFFICE SPACES, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW OFF-PREMISE PARKING LOT LOCATION: TOTALING 980 SPACES FOR CARS AND 28 SPACES FOR MOTORCYCLES FOR SAID EXPANDED U` LEATED WEST OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AT THE 3900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 78 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation_ 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMME ITS: pp H 5 0 Ppt- r' ,v i "1 G 2 1-1-1 is C o L L- p A PRo(3C. em 2. S (4) D Oo P /dv012 RECOMMENDATION: DNS I MITIGATED DNS I EIS REVIEWED BY: ' TITLE: DATE: 11 2 FORM #14 4 III ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEti r° Renton Firs Deot l., t Fire vrevenGon Bure;tt j REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: RE:- DATE CIRCULATED:JULY 18, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 30, 1985 ECF - 087 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SA-056-85, CU-057-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL, CONDITIbNNAL.UA noIT) PROFONENT: BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PRO.:ECT TITLE: 39th & LIND PARKING AREA AND RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW 7-BUILDING COI1PLEX CURRENTLY USED FOR FABRICATION TO CONVERT LARGE PORTIONS TO ELECTRONICS LAB- ORATORY AND OFFICE SPACES, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW OFF-PREMISE PARKING LOT LOCATION: TOTALING 980 SPACES FOR CARS AND 28 SPACES FOR MOTORCYCLES FOR SAID EXPANDED U` LO;ATED WEST OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AT THE 3900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 78 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPA',T REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 1D.\.\MoA c\ L 1/44, S ze.c`u, 2e_ lAte \, 40 ,ee 0(A:. s ri V..-2.1\‘i de s t c, A .rvo w` SI,3 39 o S c>J 4- RECOMMENDATION: DNS 17 MITIGATED DNS EIS REVIEWED BY: MTITLE: fiGtS VO,A4/LL- DATE: 1-2-9 - FORM #14 1 1 1 1 1 11 i ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEti REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Q( DATE CIRCULATED:JULY 18, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 30, 1985 ECF - 087 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SA-056-85, CU-057-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL , CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROFONENT: BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PROTECT TITLE: 39th & LIND PARKING AREA AND RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW 7-BUILDING CCMPLEX CURRENTLY USED FOR FABRICATION TO CONVERT LARGE PORTIONS TO ELECTRONICS LAB- ORATORY AND OFFICE SPACES, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW OFF-PREMISE PARKING LOT LOCATION: TOTALING 980 SPACES FOR CARS AND 28 SPACES FOR MOTORCYCLES FOR SAID EXPANDED U` LOCATED WEST OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AT THE 3900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 78 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS MITIGATED DNS I EIS REVIEWED BY: C-E2 TITLE: C 4m DATE: FORM #14 I, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHELl REV: EWING DEPARTMENT:BCC 0 G DATE CIRCULATED:JULY 18, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 30, 1985 ECF - 087 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SA-056-85, CU-057-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL , CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROFONENT: BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PROJECT TITLE: 39th & LIND PARKING AREA AND RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW 7-BUILDING COMPLEX CURRENTLY USED FOR FABRICATION TO CONVERT LARGE PORTIONS TO ELECTRONICS LAB- ORATORY AND OFFICE SPACES, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW OFF-PREMISE PARKING LOT LOCATION: TOTALING 980 SPACES FOR CARS AND 28 SPACES FOR MOTORCYCLES FOR SAID EXPANDED U` LO;ATED WEST OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AT THE 3900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 78 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPAI;T REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals I 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: fy DNS 1 MITIGATED DNS I EIS REVIEWED BY: I TITLE: DATE: off- -.0) 7 D FORM #14 1 ENv1KONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: E SI( ( DATE CIRCULATED:JULY 18, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 30, 1985 ECF - 087 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SA-056-85, CU-057-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL , CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROFONENT: BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PRO.:ECT TITLE: 39th & LIND PARKING AREA AND RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW 7-BUILDING CCMPLEX CURRENTLY USED FOR FABRICATION TO CONVERT LARGE PORTIONS TO ELECTRONICS LAB- ORATORY AND OFFICE SPACES, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW OFF-PREMISE PARKING LOT LOCATION: TOTALING 980 SPACES FOR CARS AND 28 SPACES FOR MOTORCYCLES FOR SAID EXPANDED U LOCATED WEST OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AT THE 3900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 78 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPPCT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services_ 16) Utilities COMhENTS: , .L prC iv!,4e /4101.0. D,e a lcd ofra)Hale eriwire - // yr p49 , ck.,7 .r.tf , 1 144 CZ) 7efryt.19 Aux 4, 7 C 409/ re, e gyred 3) rf e-, r.ey LA ,r RECOMMENDATION: ONS ,L El MITIGATED DNS I EIS I1• REVJEWED BY: TITLE: DATE : FORM #14 7 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:CA iC DATE CCIRCULATED:JULY 18, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 30, 1985 ECF - 087 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SA-056-85, CU-057-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROPOJENT: BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PROJE'.T TITLE: 39th & LIND PARKING AREA AND RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW 7-BUILDING COMPLEX CURRENTLY USED FOR FABRICATION TO CONVERT LARGE PORTIONS TO ELECTRONICS LAB- ORATORY AND OFFICE SPACES, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW OFF-PREMISE PARKING LOT LOCATEON: TOTALING 980 SPACES FOR CARS AND 28 SPACES FOR MOTORCYCLES FOR SAID EXPANDED US LOCATED WEST OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AT THE 3900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 78 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPAC " REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants of 5) Animals Of6) Energy and Natural Resources aOf 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare ut 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RA y/14 0 iv 6 xi v 6 . S.N EE S ro BE Ccs mineral B6Tw eetV S. w . 3 f ST• Ayv0 wt i Sr, To ZM mgve TA1 WI FLOW igav €$ 7 /4 A4641 . RECOMhENDATION: DNS n MITIGATED DNS fl EIS REVIEHED BY: I ` • ^ •TITLE: ritA itg, t3(ATANS. 6V66(4, DATE: 7--/ - V? FORM ##14 I 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEL, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: L) T ! L I / DATE CIRCULATED:JULY 18, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 30, 1985 ECF •. 087 _ 85 APPL: CATION NO(s). SA-056-85, CU-057-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL , CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PROP(!NENT: BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PROJECT TITLE: 39th & LIND PARKING AREA AND RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW 7-BUILDING CON'PLEX CURRENTLY USED FOR FABRICATION TO CONVERT LARGE PORTIONS TO ELECTRONICS LAB- ORATORY AND OFFICE SPACES, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW OFF-PREMISE PARKING LOT LOCATION: TOTALING 980 SPACES FOR CARS AND 28 SPACES FOR MOTORCYCLES FOR SAID EXPANDED US LOCATED WEST OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AT THE 3900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 78 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS MITIGATED DNS I I EIS REVIEVED BY: TITLE: 1i774/Ty pE/v ///F,E,e DATE: 5 - ' _ fr FORM 1#14 r e c em, e- OF I I. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RICHARD C. HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 9- 0 206 235-2569P0, 9gTE0 SEPTEgO BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH May 17, 1985 MAYOR rn CITY OF F.FNT0'., fl N fIS ITii MAY 20a Mr. Robert Morgan Corporate Manager Rea I Property BU11I I,AIG,/ZONIN,G ,DEPT. THE BOEING COMPANY P. 0. Box 3707 M/S 75-66 Seattle, WA 98124-2207 SUBJECT: Street Use Permit, S.W. 41st Street between Valley Parkway and Lind Avenue Dear Bob: The Board of Public Works met May 15, 1985 and the subject request was reviewed. The request was not approved by the Board because it is for an exclu- sive use to a single party and therefore not legal . Further, although the Boeing Company could request a Street Vacation the Board felt it could not support such a petition at this time. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to call . Very truly yours, 71' /5/,„ /Li— Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director Chairman/Board Public Works PMP i 4 i r } rt 1 1 I I I 1ITY OF RENT( q FILE NO(S): SA - 054 - S U E; BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT C u- OS 7 -b'S ITR + ECF- U F7-b'S MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of applications) are to be completed. Please print or type. Attoch additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY FEES Attention: B. D. Zimmerman 0 REZONE*(FROM TO ADDRESSF.O. Box 3999, MS 89-02rE:=] SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP n TEMPORARY PERMIT* Seattle 98124-2499 IX I CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* SITE PLAN APPROVAL TELEPHONE 773-5650 n-- 7 SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL No. of Cubic Yards: I ' VARIANCE* CONTACT PERSON From Section: Justification Required NAME Rob art D. Schol es , P.E. ESM, INC. 4 1 ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: f 451 S.W. 10th, #106 I 1 SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP 0 TENTATIVE PLAT Renton 98055 PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE II Q FINAL PLAT 228-5628 iIED WAIVER Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: PLAT NAME:NAME GLACIER PARK COMPANY ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 1011 Western Avenue Q PRELIMINARY CITY ZSeattle981041P0FINAL P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 625-6300 0 Residential 0 Industrial aCommercial 0 Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS 39th & Lind 0 TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY Vacant M-P 0 FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: Parking Facility NUMBER OF SPACES: n ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SQ. FT. ACRES v AREA: 3,397,680 78.00 TOTAL FEES CITY "'ills SE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE ft 11: T APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: JUL 12 1985 APPLIC TION DETERMINED TO BE:T`'v":°1 Accepted BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: IniUols) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: jQ APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: Lf lb 1n W 0 Accepted 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials) ROUTED TO: 0 Building 0 Design Eng. 0 Fire 0 Parks 0 Police 0 Policy Dev. 0 Traffic Eng. 0 Utilities REVISED 1-31-R4 Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). PARCEL A: That portion of Government Lot 31 , Section 36 , Township 23 North, Range 4 East, King County, Washington, lying west of the westerly margin of Lind Avenue and north of the north line of S.W. 43rd Street, EXCEPTING THEREFROM City of Renton road right-of-ways. PARCEL B: That portion of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 36 , Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , King County, Washington, lying north of the north margin of S.W. 43rd Street and east of the east margin of Longacres Parkway, less City of Renton road right-of-way. PARCEL C: Lots 4, 5, and 6 of the Plat of Burlington Northern Industrial Park Renton II as filed for record in Volume 111 , page 44 of Plats, Records of King County, Washington. AFFIDAVIT BRUCE D. ZIMMERMAN being duly sworn, declare that I am E21 authorized representative to act for the property owner, Downer of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS i DAY OF 197. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT Name of Notary ublic)Signature of wner) LA-4 97 4./c 9er02-3 P.O. Box 3999, MS 89-02 Addres=) Address) Seattle, Wa 98124-2499 City) State) (Zip) 773-5650 Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A That portion of Government Lot 31 . Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, King County, Washington, lying west of the westerly margin of Lind Avenue and north of the north line of S.W. 43rd Street, EXCEPTING THEREFROM City of Renton road right-of-ways. PARCEL. That portion of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying north of the north margin of S.W. 43rd Street and east of the east margin of Longacres Parkway, less City of Renton road right-of-way. PARCEL C Lots 4, 5, and 6 of the Plat of Burlington Northern Industrial Park Renton II as filed for record in Volume III , page 44 of Plats, Records of King County, Washington. W7:BAC1 CITY OF RENTON JUL 121985 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. A I OF )? . ti ECF: C/=- y5 z City of Renton 1 u: s, s x::: F••oak IDS-7 - 3 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST0, 911-E0 sEPZ`-• Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best descri)tion you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowl,:dge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answEred "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONF'ROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1.Name of proposed project, if applicable: 39th & LIND PARKING AREA and RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX 2.Name of applicant: Boeing Aerospace Company 3.Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Contact Person : P.O. Box 3999, MS-89-02 Robert D. Scholes , P.E. Seattle, Wa 98124-2499 ESM, INC. Attn: B.D. Zimmerman 451 S.W. 10th, #106 773-5650 Renton , Wa 98055 4.Date checklist prepared: June 28, 1985 228-5628 S.Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department 6.Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): See attached. CITY O;, R7.—NTON W [E 1L-- JUL 12 1985 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT, 1 7: Do you have any pli for future additions, expansions, 'urther activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. No plans at this time. 8.List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Environmental Checklist together with an EIS prepared for the filing of the original plat in the late 1970's or early 1980's. 9.Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None, to the best of our knowledge. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Site plan approval ; building permit from City of Renton. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. See attached. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. See attached. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1.EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); CIO rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Less than 1%. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. See attached. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None Noted 2 - r e. Describe tht purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. It is anticipated that approximately 5,000 yards of fill will be imported and approximately 10,000 yards of material will be moved to f. Lcreate drainage during the onstr cti.on phase. ouid erosion Occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Construction is anticipated to occur during the summer construction season during a period of little or no rain. Steps will be taken to prevent waterborne materials from entering the drainage system and appropriate erosion control measures will be taken to preclude silt laden waters from entering the waterways. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 92% of the site will be covered with asphalt on completion of the construction. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Temporary erosion control measures in compliance with City standards and good construction practice will be taken. 2.AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. See attached. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? None are known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Construction equipment will be maintained in good working condition during the construction phase to mitigate impacts on air quality. Vehicles within the Renton area are required to have emission inspections annually as a condition of licensing, which would mitigate major impacts to the air quality due to this project. 3.WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Springbrook Creek abutts the property to the west. We are informed by the Planning Department that this system is not subject to the Shorelines Permit process of the State of Washington. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Work will occur within 200 feet of the described waters. This work will include clearing, grubbing, grading, paving, striping, and landscaping. See plans for additional information). 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None is proposed at this time. 3 - i 4) Will the prL,._gal require surface water withdr, is or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. No water withdrawals are proposed. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. See attached. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Grease, oil , dirt, and other materials common to the parking lot environment could enter the surface water system through the storm drain system. These impacts will be mitigated by the use of catch basins and oil separators to reduce the volume and quantity of contamination. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No ground water will be withdrawn due to this proposal . 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The drainage from the parking lot area will be collected to area catch basins , conducted by underground piping to the existing storm drain system within the street and ultimately be discharged into Springbrook Creek. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Materials spilled or discarded onto the parking area could enter the surface water system through the storm drain as a result of parking lot cleaning or be borne by rain water. 4 - d. Proposed measures.to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The installation of catch basins and oil separators will be used to mitigate pollution. Storm drain retention as required by the City of Renton Department of Public Works will also be designed into the system. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: aide maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: ir, cedar, pine, other o Shrubs o crop or grain V Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? See attached. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known to exist on the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: See attached. S.Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known to inhabit the area. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. This site is not a migration route to the best of our knowledge and belief. S - i a d. Proposed m___ures to preserve or enhance wildli..., .f any: See attached. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. See attached. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: See attached. 7.Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None are anticipated at this time. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None are anticipated at this time. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: See attached. b. Noise I) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? See attached. 6 - i I I I 2) What types and levals of noise would be create° oy or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. See attached. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? See attached. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. The site may have been used for agriculture several years ago, however, since it has been filled and developed into an industrial area that use is now precluded. c. Describe any structures on the site. No structures exist on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Not applicable. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? M-P, Manufacturing Park f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? M-P, Multi-Option g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? No one would reside or work on the completed project since it is a parking area. People would park here to work at the site abutting to the south. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not Applicable. 7 - I I 1. Proposed me res to ensure the proposal is con ,ible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposal is an outright permitted use under the zone and in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. No structures are proposed on the site. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Views in the vicinity would be altered from an existing vacant land to that of a well landscaped parking area. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: See attached. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? See attached. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Because of the directional type of lighting that is proposed, no safety hazard is anticipated nor is it expected to interfere with existing views. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Existing off-site sources of light consist of street lights along 39th, Lind and Raymond Streets. These are not expected to have substantial impacts on the proposal . d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: The design of the luminaires will be such as to control lighting glare impacts due to development. 8 - 1 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There is a 40-foot pedestrian easement and greenbelt along Sprinbrook Creek , together with a 20-foot pedestrian access easeement from the westerly terminus of S.W. 39th Street to the greenbelt provided in the plat. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None are known to exist. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None are known to exist on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not Applicable. I Li. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. See attached. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? See attached. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? See attached. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe indicate whether public or private). See attached. 9 - I 0 e. Will the proj use (or occur in the immediate city of) water. rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. See attached f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. See attached g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: If additional striping on Lind is necessary to facilitate the added traffic , this would be accomplished at the time of construction of the facility. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project would require additional fire and traffic protection. No other additional services are anticipated. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None are proposed at this time. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, Caprefuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic sys em, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity would be provided by Puget Sound Power and Light. Water service would be provided by the City of Renton. No off-site . improvements to the system are anticipated to be necessary. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: r Name Printed: 10 - i r 11-' ' 4 I ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST SUPPLEMENTAL _INFORMATION A. BACKGROUND 6. The phasing for completion of the conversion of the office and laboratory structure will be done in two phases, to be completed prior to December 31 , 1985. Construction on the parking lot is anticipated to commence upon issuance of a building permit with target dates for completion of paving by October 15, 1985 and completion of the landscaping by December I , 1985. 10. Conditional Use Permit; Site Plan Approval ; Building Permits from City of Renton. II . That portion of the site that is generally known as the Renton Benaroya complex is currently occupied by seven large structures that are currently used for fabrication, storage, and office space. Proposed changes will convert portions of this facility to include approximately 71 ,000 square feet of electronics laboratory space, 247,500 square feet of office space, 297,300 square feet of fabrication area, and 670, 100 square feet of storage area. Due to the changes in use it is anticipated that construction of a parking lot in Parcel C as noted on the legal description will provide 980 parking spaces for automobiles, together with approximately 28 parking spaces for motorcycles. Raymond Avenue is currently gated off and in the process of this conversion of use, both Raymond Avenue between 39th and 4lst will be opened as a traveled way to facilitate access to the Longacres Parkway. When this street is opened approximately 29 parking spaces currently available will be lost. (See Exhibits "A" and "B" for existing and proposed uses. Improvements to the new parking area will consist of grading, installation of peripheral sidewalks, installation of a drainage system, illumination, landscaping and irrigation, as required by Code. 12. The site is located in the south portion of Renton. It is bounded on the west by the Longacres Parkway and Springbrook Creek, on the north by S.W. 39th Street, on the east by Lind Avenue and on the south by S.W. 43rd Street. See attached vicinity map, Exhibit "D") . B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1 . EARTH c. The site was filled several years ago. The fill material was generally glacial till of the Alderwood series. There is a small area that is unfilled currently, but will be filled during grading operations. The area of the existing industrial park has been filled, graded, paved, and no additional grading is anticipated in this area. 2. AIR a. During construction there will be an increase in dust and exhaust emissions from construction equipment. i q 2- After construction is completed approximately 2,000 additional vehicle trips per day will be generated from use on the site. Total traffic generation from the proposal is estimated at 5,084 trips per day. Emissions from these vehicles could be expected to be of the same type and substance which would normally be associated with these types of uses and are expected to be within the ambient air requirements of the City of Renton. 3. WATER a. Surface: 5. Discussions with the City of Renton indicate that the 100 year flood plain encroaches onto the site near the corner of S.W. 4lst Street and the Longacres Parkway. (See site plan) . 6. Grease, oil , dirt, and other materials common to the parking lot environment could enter the surface water system through the storm drain system. These impacts will be mitigated by the use of catch basins and oil separators to reduce the volume and quantity of contamination from the proposed parking area. No change in the discharge of materials from the paved areas of the Benaroya portion of the complex is expected. 4. PLANTS b. As previously stated, no physical changes with the exception of opening the street are proposed for the Benaroya portion of the site. The portion that the new parking areas will be constructed on will be cleared and grubbed in its entirety, however, since this area has been previously cleared and filled, most vegetation on the site has come up volunteer from wind blown seed. d. No changes in existing landscaping are proposed for the Benaroya portion of the complex. In those areas where no parking areas are proposed, landscaping will be in conformance with City of Renton requirements, including 5% of the site for landscape plantings, together with an additional 2% wildlife landscaping. In accordance with City of Renton requirements, all new landscaped areas will be irrigated. 5. ANIMALS d. 2% of the new parking area site will be landscaped in a manner to enhance wildlife habitation. No outward physical changes are proposed with regard to the existing facility. 3- 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. With regard to the new parking areas, energy requirements will include the illumination of the site during hours of darkness. It is anticipated that after working hours, the total site lighting will be reduced by 50% using time controls in an effort to reduce consumption. The change in the existing complex to include more office and laboratory space will increase the energy demand by the overall complex. c. As noted in (a) above, it is proposed to double circuit the lighting system so that after working hours the total amount of energy used would be reduced by approximately 50% providing only sufficient lighting for security purposes. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. 2) As a matter of general policy, all applicable measures are taken by the Company to protect the health of its employees at all times. b. Noise I ) The existing Benayora complex currently takes approximately 1 ,563 parking spaces. With the conversion of the use of the buildings together with the additional parking an increase in parking noise from the additional 1 ,000 parking spaces is anticipated. In addition, since there is a rail spur along the south line of the proposed parking site, and an additional spur between the boundaries of Lots 5 and 6 some railroad noise can be anticipated depending on the frequency of the train service to other buildings in the area. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. Land uses to the south, east, and west are currently office and industrial uses. The property to the north of the proposed site is currently vacant land. b. The proposed parking site may have been used for agriculture several years ago as is true of the Benaroya complex, however, given the filling and development into industrial use that has taken place, that use is now precluded. c. The portion in Parcel "C" currently has streets and utilities stubbed to the property and has been filled. The portion within the Benaroya complex consists of seven tilt-slab concrete structures which generally have a warehouse appearance on the exterior. d. No structures are proposed to be demolished. 2,848 people are expected to work in the complex at peak employment in April of 1986. Ii 4- 10. AESTHETICS c. The proposed parking area will be landscaped and buffered with landscape berms, thus reducing the visual impact of the paving areas from the street. These mounds will be landscaped in compliance with City requirements. As this landscaping matures, visual impacts would be further reduced by the density of the landscaping berms. 11 . LIGHT AND GLARE a. The parking lot will be illuminated during the hours of use. Maximum intensity is estimated to be 1/2 ft. candle. The illuminaires will be of such a design as to direct the lighting onto the parking areas and to minimize the effects of glare to off-site properties. No changes are anticipated within the existing complex. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. The site is bounded by Longacres Parkway on the west, S.W. 43rd Street on the south, Lind Avenue on the east, and S.W. 39th on the north. In addition, internal circulation is provided by S.W. 4lst Street and Raymond Avenue. The opening of access along Raymond Avenue will open the option of traffic entering or exiting the site from any one of the peripheral streets. 41st Street and 43rd Street provide access to the on and off ramps from SR 167 (the Valley Freeway) . Traffic west along 43rd Street would provide access to 1-5 and traffic north along Lind would provide access to 1-405 to Grady Way. b. The site is currently served by Metro Route #247. A new route #163 is proposed to go into effect later in 1985. c. The proposed project will result in total parking spaces of 2,542. In the process of this proposed development, approximately 29 parking spaces will be lost (see Exhibit "C") . d. The proposed development will increase the traffic in the vicinity by approximately 2,000 trips per day. The opening of Raymond Avenue to public traffic will act to disperse the concentrations giving a variety of alternatives for access to abutting arterials. Some channelization may be appropriate at the intersection of S.W. 39th Street and Lind to facilitate left turns from Lind onto S.W. 39th Street. e. Railroad spurs currently service all areas of the site on easements which were drafted with the original plats. Utilization of these spurs as a result of this proposed development is not anticipated. Impacts on other transportation alternatives would be expected to be similar to those generated by any development of this type. I 5- f. Approximately 2,000 additional vehicle trips per day for a total of 5,084 vehicle trips per day could be expected to be generated on the site with full utilization of the parking areas. Peak volumes are expected to occur between 6:00 and 8:00 a.m. and 3:00 to 5:00 p.m. when people arrive at and depart from the facility. g. The occupant proposes that upon completion of the facility, if additional striping on Lind is necessary, this would be accomplished during the time of construction after consultation with the Traffic Engineering Division of the City of Renton Public Works Department. Additionally, there are ongoing discussions with the City concerning additional traffic signals in the area. It is proposed that these mitigating measures be worked out with the Public Works Department. i y RENTON BENAROYA COMPLEX LAB STRG vA STRG 21K 41KICE 11K OFF 85K d OFFICE 6 * 75K 33.5K 7 7 81 5(Jr o1- 6 r 7-81.7 1 1 1 o ( 3 ( 1 U l+ r 1 I n 7.81 1 , i tit 41 II 1TIIIIT ra LiJ L JEr ali 3 li VL J L r a FAB a 145.3K 104K STRG 1/4' 70K FAB b. STRG98K STRG r" 4 STRG STRG 16.7K --- 114K STRG 38K FAB 82K FAB w w 2K OFFICE a a to a J u LJ 337.4K r 1L-T81-1 7 81.2 n 7-81-3 r—t---r) (2=2Hl1t 1.L. 41U ITIIIIT SITE PLAN 6,EXISTING K4ll . NOW 4-)c n I 1 1, I-`'‘ I 1 ntIv 1 uru BENAROYA COMPLEX OFFICE OFFICE LAB OFFICE 96K pd 75K 21K 41K v Ar OFFICE 33.5K 1 81 4 7I 7 81 S o CI Itr •:1.7 r 1 O ( 1 (--) r 1 ln 7B1 s M , f 4111 T II I[T 4 ru o a L) o J CI LAB I 50K 4 FAB 145.3K STRG STRG 53K 16.7K J _. 165K STRG 98K STRG 82K FAB e STRG STRG 2K OFFICE e Y r a r J a u 337J4K FAB 4 70K r 1 81 1 7.81.2 7--81-3 c2=jit____J--1 fi r______-r-t--n r 1 r, 4111 /T11//T SITE PLAN Itt, PROPOSED CALI 0 MOM I Ii 1 I I 1 EXHIBIT "C" BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PARKING SPACE CALCULATIONS Building Use ProDQseli Are _Perking Spec Lab 71 ,000 SF 71 Office 247,500 SF 1,237.5 Fabrication 297,300 SF 297.3 Storage 670, 100 SF 446.73 Total = 2,052.53'2053 spaces required. Spaces Provided; Existing Facility: 1 ,534 spaces ilew Facility 980 spaces Motorcycles 28 spaces Total Spaces 2,542 spaces WD:BAC i IOth ST wY W Pe 405 WO GISswI1ath1STI 1111LONGACRES 1) 1IRACE TR ACK SW 27th ST SW ST. 0 J 11141 3 Ya SW 34th ST i SW 38th ST W 39th ST J I SITE aw .1.t I ST SW 43rd ST L VICINITY MAP Not To Scale EXHIBIT "D" 4 , . 1 r CITY or RENTON area Sterner Lighting Systems f 113'1 O rnoaldway L3 JUL 12 1985 walkway Executive II thLDiNG,z0N,NG G l=i. The EXECUTIVE II is a classic design nect, capacitor, ballast, socket, lamp The fact that EXECUTIVE II is one of with outstanding lighting efficiency. and hydro-formed reflector in a single, our top selling luminaires is not sur- It offers precise light control, plus hinged and removable module. prising. It provides a total lighting Sterner's Unitized Ballast/Reflector All this inside a luminaire with the package flexible enough to meet many Assembly for easy installation and strong, clean, rectilinear lines that of the most demanding lighting maintenance. This is a complete sys- make it versatile enough to fit many requirements. tern, including primary quick discon- settings. I t._ Short Form Ordering Guide To facilitate easy ordering we have provided all of the information you need on these two pages (2 and 3) to order our "standard" Executive II luminaire. Pole and Finish selections have been abbreviated to include only the sizes and finishes that are most in demand. To order, just follow the three time-saving steps shown at right. IMPORTANT! If more data on materials, options, finishes or pole sizes is required, please see complete listings in Section 8 Poles or Section 14 Color Chart. ORDERING INFORMATION Obtain the catalog number for the luminaire series which fits your requirements. Select, in sequence, a code for each feature from those listed in the format illustrated below. EXAMPLE: eoN i.40 4c;) sc? 43- 4.0c, s4-,,, e 4`" $1--(4,. vco ET 20 NOTE A NOTE B NOTE C SPECIFY NOTE 120 277 See SECTION 8 for 25 LAMP D 208 480 pole selection or WATTAGE 240 VND* SECTION 12 for brackets. NOTE A NOTE C NOTE D AO—Clear Patterned Glass P— Photoelectric Control Receptacle M — Mercury Vapor standard) - AC—Fused Terminal Block H — Metal Halide A—Clear Glass HS—House Side Cut-off Shield S—High Pressure Sodium TF—Tilt Fitter I— Incandescent NOTE B N —Options Not Desired 10 —Single 28—2 @ 180° 29—2 @ 90° 32-3@120° 39 —3 @ 90° 49—4 @ 90° Voltage Not Determined WIND LOAD RATING TABLE Luminaire Luminaire Number& r Size Spacing TL` i 1 1 1 10 28 29 32 39 49 I 1 ( Single 2.9o. L 10 29 20 3 5 5 6 6 7 25 4 8 8 10 10 14 2 @ 190°3 @ w 4 @ 90° 28 39 49 r 1 Determine luminaire requirements. Select, in sequence, the code for each luminaire feature from those listed under step number one. Example:ET 25 AO 10 P 400 S 120 2 Determine pole height, shape and material. Find the corresponding code in the chart under step num- ber two and add it to luminaire code. Example: ET 25 AQ 10 P 400 S 120 RTS05-H- Note: For wall bracket information see Section 12) 3 Determine luminaire and pole finish. Select desired finish from chart under step number three and add it to luminaire code. Example:ET 25 AQ 10 P 400 S 120 RTS05-H-N i 2 POLES Poles include anchor base (surface hinged bases for 15' and 20' aluminum poles), prewiring anchor bolts, and a baked enamel or hard-coat anodic finish. 15' 20' 25' 30' 40' Round Tapered RTA06-C- RTA11-C- RTA13-B- RTA16-B- RTA23-B- Aluminum load rating load rating load rating 10 load rating 9 load rating 14 16 10 RTA14-B- RTA17-B- load rating 15 load rating 14 Square SSA18-E- SSA25-E- SSA27-D- SSA28-D- Straight load rating load rating load rating 14 load rating 14 N.A. Aluminum 8 8 SSA19-E- SSA26-E- load rating load rating 16 27 Round Tapered RTS03-H- RTSO4-H- RTS05-H- RTS06-H- RTS08-H- Steel load rating load rating load rating load rating load rating 18 27 37 32 30 Square STS03-P- STSO4-P- STS05-P- STS06-P- STS12-P- Tapered load rating load rating load rating load rating load rating Steel 46 30 26 23 16 3 MATERIAL FINISHES Baked enamel:An electro-statically applied acrylic finish deposited on the metal and baked in an oven to harden and cure the coating. Anodic:An extremely hard finish indigenous to the metal. Baked Enamel Anodic Light Bronze (311) A M Medium Bronze (312) B N Dark Bronze (313) C P Black E Q Natural Aluminum G R If a finish coat is not required, insert the following code for the type of pole specified: AD—Red Oxide Primer For Steel AC—Brushed Satin Finish For Aluminum If the color or finish is not known, insert the following in the catalog number: NK—Not Known ti• I i II iI I I DIMENSIONS Recommended Luminaire Standard Mounting Wattage Size Arm Height EXECUTIVE II 20 up to 200 watts 16"x20"x6" 2"x4"-8"7'6"to 20' EXECUTIVE II 25 up to 400 watts 20"x25"x8" 21/4"x6"-12" 15'to 40' Mechanical Features Unitized ballast/reflector system. Hinged and removable as a unit. Easy access for installation and mainte- nance. Thermal and impact tempered glass lens. Extruded aluminum arm with galvanized steel threaded tie rods. Continuous extruded aluminum lens frame with tubular silicone gasketing for weathertight seal. Photometric Flexibility The EXECUTIVE II takes lamps of 70 to 400 watts, depending on luminaire size. Providing excellent photo- metric control, a die-formed, semi-specular reflector system, except in 200-watt size, are field-adjustable for selection of standard I.E.S. patterns II and III. (Photometric data is found in SECTION 14, Technical Informa- tion.) Designed and manufactured to meet or exceed U.L. and N.E.C. requirements, all fixtures bear the I.B.E.W. and U.L. label. Options photoelectric control receptacle I fused terminal block single or duplex weatherproof receptacle lumi- naires can be wall mounted (see SECTION 12) baked enamel or anodic hard coat finishes available in a wide range of colors (see SECTION 14) IN pole materials: aluminum, steel, concrete, wood, wood-laid • pole cross-sections: round, square, hexagonal, octagonal pole profiles: straight or tapered, depending on lumi- naire specifications (For specific details on poles, see SECTION 8, Poles) WOODLITE styles available (See SECTION 11, WOODLITE) UNITIZED BALLAST/REFLECTOR ASSEMBLY is hinged and removable for quick connect and disconnect. Canopy Housing formed aluminum extruded aluminum III Lampholder Grip-Tite" mogul socket Gasket E weather-seal silicone Ill Lens Tie Rods tempered glass galvanized steel W 4 Door Frame extruded 1r% 1111 aluminum A----6' III m \ Arm cross-section le h+- 21/4"-j Optional Adjustable Tilt Fitter r I The Total Lighting Package, a Sterner Exclusive Leave it to Sterner to build this many exclusive features into one good looking and functional fixture. The EXECUTIVE II is truly a total package, offering outstanding energy efficiency, long lasting perform- ance, easy and economical installation and mainte- nance. Only Sterner offers all these unique features in one clean, flexible design: Efficient Photometric Performance: Cut-off Types II and III field adjustable. Specifically designed for the energy efficient 150, 200, 250, and 400 watt high pressure sodium lamps. See Section 14 for complete, accurate, supported data on all HID lamps. 1] 1 f T 7e.„. ik. , e;L:(y,;:' . 77 w Automatic Primary Disconnect: Operates when UBR—Unitized Ballast/Reflector Assembly: Com- door is opened—includes fusing for additional plete optical and electric components are hinged safety.and removable as a unit for easy installation and maintenance. Ballast also removable as a unit. j 1ti T-34450 "-t f-r_; , ..: ;--=" g3 UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES INC.® LISTED I ELECTRIC FIXTURE ISSUE NO. D-29,588 SUITABLE FOR WET LOCATIONS n PRINTED IN U.S.A. ,' . Extruded Aluminum Housing: One-piece miter U.L.: Entire fixture listed "Suitable for use in wet bend sidewall construction, with canopy perma- location." nently sealed and welded in place. Entire housing factory finished with Electro-Statically applied, oven baked, textured enamel finish. I I I I i I I µer s/ 1—:4''''. 1"-.L,..-"!-:5—4.:-._.,..,,,..., i A 1 //V- , i Maintenance Without Tools: Complete mainte- Sealed Optical: One-piece hydro-formed semi- nance may be performed without the use of tools. specular reflector is hinged and sealed against a one piece silicone gasket. I Ivk Tempered Glass: Both heat and impact resistant. Extruded Aluminum Door Frame Assembly: Accu- Available with clear or highly efficient, slightly rately mitered, and permanently secured with ex- diffusing, clear crystal glass. truded internal corner keys. ter.1%-1-- ?. -",: . F ce i_ fly, 1, I.' 7. „ . fy k , • ', r Computer Service: Sterner can provide a com- puterized layout service from verifying your cal- culations to providing a complete point-by-point project print out. I fl a ",--.„..._...... 7• Ressece. nor2= m0351= elt... xm7—.-: 7- ri . ----- - e-- 14%,.. 1. 71::- 11—.: --. 1,.. 1;•_. i. . . 1g, : 1,-. 204.. X ' .,!,. fr.+4 41:_,,, v.,..„:, 4. 1.,.... . iiiiir.... . r 4 • n' 1.• • 01/4. i . 1; 41. PA' xt.,- 04"" i•tH li'• 1 - 1• 1 . . r--- 4"4:. '• 7., ' : ; 1 b lir- • it f. • i i dililil116l4 trlf. 7. 4. ... TT,-.- I I a ..• . •'. P. il .-..— x. 1 i 4 • 1r 4, i c.. i._i . 4 . ... ,., i E. -.--!‘ V: _ ,, ---- 1 . Ti 1 , 1 rrl.,, t. A.,,,,,, 7,-- . --, 1 ii•• .• i. ‘'- L.• - ,. .,. •',... --- • ,-,' L. -. LoiK, 31 , n - f ' ,.-- •-:-... ir"- 1.&&: 1 ,' ir^--, wilia 1, 1 - lit I ; ttli A ti '. A L. 1 -,.,.,-.-, U 717•# 7• ii 1 4/ I ir. 61 11111.71.. 1 • 111. 1 ' 1° • . 1 ' IA 11 t• . i I I, 11 • a/ 110 1110% 3. i litty. r ., y 4 F) Lid II'f„,1Cve.• • 0 I 4, , sa e t A I t 4 wi , 0 , R 1 . a ! Y I i I Liilk.y, am laiii42.4.71 fr --r 1 iL.A.k7.47,.. t*....to-4,t, 4.,....,,4 . 4, 4, / , x> r k . -~ i .ter 0 j 1i'/111 t,' # ie.'tit r'1 ' lr-,= .=% it, .I ti ` r 1 r n t -i .. - 1,, Vi r illf...l ttr t 604-simi,,,:.,:.,, . i ttfi,7111 %Kt• ,,....,: ...:-.),„....:., ,,z,..N.4•11,,S-! SAMPLE SPECIFICATION Executive II The luminaire sidewalls shall be mitre-bend con- is opened,the ballast primary circuit is broken,there- struction from a single piece of aluminum extru- by allowing the fixture to be serviced without shock sion, alloy 6063-T6. Crowned aluminum sheet can- hazard. Lamp socket to have nickel plated current opy spot-welded and sealed to housing. Finish on carrying parts with lamp grip. Ballast components housing shall be Lens encased with mounted on a separate panel having quick-release extruded aluminum door frame sealed with a sili- fasteners. Ballast shall be capable of starting cone gasket. Door frame assembly shall be remov- type of lamp of watts atvoltage down able. The door to be hinged with stainless steel pins to —20°F. The 200°C, 600-volt insulated wiring shall and retained with quick release safety latch. Sealed be installed between the ballast components and the reflector system to prevent entrance of dust or mois- socket. The flat lens shall be thermal and impact Lure. Reflector is precision hydro-formed aluminum, tempered plate glass. The standard arm assembly chemically brightened and anodized to semi-specular shall be a rectangular aluminum extrusion complete finish. Reflector system is factory pre-set to provide with non-slip tie rod channels serving as a compres- standard I.E.S. distribution patterns II and III, and sion member with two threaded and galvanized steel field adjustable by socket location. Reflector system tie rods and lock nuts in tension between pole and hinged and latched to gasketed door frame for easy luminaire. The luminaire shall bear the listing mark of cleaning or removal. A fused disconnect shall be fur- Underwriters Laboratory. "Fixtures suitable for wet nished inside the fixture so that when the door frame locations.” STERNeR LIGHTING SYSTEMS INCORPORATED 41:11IWinsted, Minnesota 55395 (612) 485-2141 Minneapolis Phone (612) 473-1251 College Point (Long Island), New York 11356 (212) 358-5655 Printed in U.S.A. ESM inc. A CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEY, AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT CONSULTING FIRM July 10, 1985 CITY OC• 6J NTON Ce) rim Hearing Examiner JUL 12 1985 City of Renton BUILDING/ZONING DEPT.200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Wa 98055 Re: Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Approval Boeing Aerospace Company Dear Sir: In support of the application of the Boeing Aerospace Company for site plan approval and a Conditional Use Permit for the site bounded by the Longacres Parkway on the west, S.W. 4lst on the south, Lind Avenue on the east, and S.W. 39th on the north, we offer the following information for your consideration: A. S aaehens ye .Fl.a, The proposed use is compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, current Zoning Ordinances and requirements of the City of Renton. The buildings in question are constructed on site. At this time the proposed Conditional Use Permit will add necessary parking to facilitate the conversion of a portion of the buildings into office space and laboratory areas. No changes to the outside features of the buildings are proposed. The original construction was in compliance with the requirements of the existing Comprehensive Plan. The current zoning for the property in question is M-P. The proposed uses, as shown in Exhibit "B" are an outright permitted use under the existing zoning. B. Q nj itvgeed The conversion of this property from warehousing to the proposed use will provide employment for additional members of the community with the associated increase in the business levels in the community, increasing the income to the City by taxes and, in general , enhancing the economic and social environment of the City of Renton. 451 Southwest 10th Street Suite 106 Renton Washington,98055 206)228-5628 i I i i i I i i I I i I i I i Hearing Examiner July 10, 1985 Page Two C. Effect on Ad..>aGgnt PGs e!~t As noted above, the property is currently zoned M-P. Existing uses in the general vicinity are of an industrial nature or vacant land. Additionally, butting lands are zoned M-P which means that the proposed use is compatible with the existing uses or possible uses on vacant lands in the vicinity. D. The proposed use is compatible with the uses in the neighborhood in that the existing and proposed uses in the vicinity are M-P and the proposed use is an outright permitted use in the M-P zoning. E. farliag The additional parking which is proposed to be constructed is specifically required under paragraph C of the City of Renton Zoning Code concerning offstreet parking. Exhibit "C" of the attachments to the Environmental Checklist provides a breakdown of the proposed uses within various structures and the associated parking spaces required by the Code. It should be noted that 2,053 spaces are required and 2,542 spaces are provided. F. The Boeing Aerospace Company proposes to open access along Raymond Avenue South to enhance vehicular and pedestrian access through and around the site. This will provide access to S.W. 43rd Street, to the Longacres Parkway, S.W. 4lst Street, and Lind Street, as well as direct access to Lind Street from S.W. 39th Street. G. Ng_ise, GiaCe Potential noise, light, and glare impacts are reviewed in the Environmental Checklist in some detail . Potential noise will be from traffic to and from the site, which will occur in the morning and afternoon hours as employees arrived at and depart from the parking areas. Given the industrial use of the area, this is not expected to create a potential noise that would exceed those allowed by appropriate Noise Ordinances. i I I i Hearing Examiner July 10, 1985 Page Three It should be noted that light and glare will be controlled by use of directional luminaires within the parking areas and it should be further noted that the lighting system will be double circuited to allow 50 percent of the luminaires to be turned off during times when a level of I/2' candle is not required. The result will be that except at times when employees are on the site, approximately 50 percent of the luminaires will be turned off to reduce glare and save energy. This level of lighting will provide lighting for security purposes only. H. idgaQina Within the existing facility no changes in the landscape are proposed. Within the area that is proposed to be constructed as a new parking area, 5% landscaping or more will be provided. Additionally, 2% of the site will be landscaped in such a manner to enhance wildlife habitat, all in conformance with the requirements of the appropriate Ordinances of the City of Renton. 1 . Agcgssory .Uges No accessory uses, as defined by Code, are proposed under this proposal . J. CoOvgr.sjol) The existing structures are being converted from mostly storage and warehouse facilities to increase office and electronics laboratory uses. This application for the Conditional Use Permit and site plan approval of the parking area is being made in compliance with the requirements of the City of Renton Code. K• euDlic _ ImPLAyemep-ts The proposed improvement requires no improvements to existing public facilities, utilities, and services and no public improvements are anticipated to be required. The Boeing Aerospace Company is currently working with the Traffic Division to provide additional signalization in the general vicinity of the site and has proposed to provide striping and left turn pockets should they be necessary at the intersection of S.W. 39th and Lind Avenue to facilitate left turn movements into the parking areas. Hearing Examiner July 10, 1985 Page Four Based on the above, we feel that the proposed Conditional Use Permit should be granted in that it is in compliance with each and every requirement of the City of Renton Code with regard to Conditional Use Permits, provides a major benefit to the economic well being of the community, is in strict compliance with the requirements of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code of the City of Renton and is, in fact, an outright permitted use for this property. Very truly yours, NC. ROBERT D. SCHOLES, P.E. President 1 1 1 f a t ellCrw: manmpany b 5601 Sixth Avenue South P.O. Box 80326 Seattle, Washington 98108 duly 3, 1985 J U L 9 - 1985 206/762-4750 ESM, INC Boeing Aerospace Company Facilities Department P. 0. Box 3999, MS 89-02 Seattle, Washington 98124 Attention: Mr. Bruce D. Zimmerman Re: Letter of Authority Gentlemen: It is our understanding that in connection with your ground lease development of the S. W. 39th Street parking lot, owned by Burlington Northern Railroad, you intend to file a master application, a conditional use permit, site plan approval , and environmental checklist, with the City of Renton. The property with which we are concerned was formerly called Benaroya Business Park - Renton and is currently owned by Pacific Northwest Group A. The legal description of this property is attached as Exhibit A. As a condition of filing the above documents, it is our understanding that the owner or authorized representative of the owner must sign the applications. This letter hereby authorizes Mr. Bruce D. Zimmerman, Facilities Department, Boeing Aerospace Company, to act on authority of Pacific Northwest Group A only with regard to the applications noted above, to be submitted to the City of Renton. Very truly yours, PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP A, / a joint entur / / Bruce E. Hosforci,f Partner CITY OF RENTON n0 11 JUL 121985 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT, i i i . S Glacier Park Company REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT A SUBSIDIARY OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC. June 27, 1985 Boeing Aerospace Company Facilities Department P. 0. Box 3999, MS 89-02 Seattle, Washington 98124 Attention: Mr. Bruce D. Zimmerman Re: Letter of Authority Gentlemen: It is our understanding that in connection with your ground lease development of the S. W. 39th Street parking lot, you intend to file a master application, a conditional use permit, site plan approval , and environmental checklist, with the City of Renton. The property in question, which is currently held in fee ownership by Burlington Northern Railroad Properties Inc. concerns lots 4 (portion thereof) , 5, and 6 of the Burlington Northern Industrial Park of Renton, Division II , as filed for record in Volume III , page S 42-44 of Plats, Records of King County. As a condition of filing the above documents, it is our understanding that the owner or authorized representative of the owner must sign the applications. This letter hereby authorizes Mr. Bruce D. Zimmerman, Facilities Department, Boeing Aerospace Company, to act on authority of the Glacier Park Company in its capacity on behalf of the owner in fee title of the above described property with regard to the applications noted above, to be submitted to the City of Renton. Very truly yours, GLACIER PARK COMPANY on behalf of Burlington Northern Properties Inc. By ames Warren Cook Sr. Corporate Counsel cc: ESM, Inc. Myrna Brune 2.5.33 1011 Western Avenue, Suite 700 • Seattle, Washington 98104 • 206 625-6300 CITY OF RENTOVI' N D. qg !' 1 1 JUL 121985 i BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. A i ENDINI? OF FILE Fig TITLE t t"* 0.0414044,,„, 441X11 NI\ ft.116.N,44.4*. t r• 44 t. 641.' s 414,,11, 4411110. a.. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There is a 40-foot pedestrian easement and greenbelt along Sprinbrook Creek, together with a 20-foot pedestrian access easeement from the westerly terminus of S.W. 39th Street to the greenbelt provided in the plat. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None are known to exist. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific. or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None are known to exist on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not Applicable. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. See attached. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? See attached. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? See attached. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe indicate whether public or private). See attached. 9 - 1 l a. Will the proj___ use (or occur in the immediate city of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. See attached f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? if known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. See attached g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: If additional striping on Lind is necessary to facilitate the added traffic , this would be accomplished at the time of construction of the facility. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project would require additional fire and traffic protection. No other additional services are anticipated. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None are proposed at this time. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity)natural gas, CVrefuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity would be provided by Puget Sound Power and Light. Water service would be provided by the City of Renton. No off-site . improvements to the system are anticipated to be necessary. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: /3r Name Printed: 10 - 076: 11-P 1 i i Ili i i ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 5iJPPLEMENTAL J NFORMAT I ON A. BACKGROUND 6. The phasing for completion of the conversion of the office and laboratory structure will be done in two phases, to be completed prior to December 31 , 1985. Construction on the parking lot is anticipated to commence upon issuance of a building permit with target dates for completion of paving by October 15, 1985 and completion of the landscaping by December I , 1985. 10. Conditional Use Permit; Site Plan Approval ; Building Permits from City of Renton. II . That portion of the site that is generally known as the Renton Benaroya complex is currently occupied by seven large structures that are currently used for fabrication, storage, and office space. Proposed changes will convert portions of this facility to include approximately 71 ,000 square feet of electronics laboratory space, 247,500 square feet of office space, 297,300 square feet of fabrication area, and 670, 100 square feet of storage area. Due to the changes in use it is anticipated that construction of a parking lot in Parcel C as noted on the legal description will provide 980 parking spaces for automobiles, together with approximately 28 parking spaces for motorcycles. Raymond Avenue is currently gated off and in the process of this conversion of use, both Raymond Avenue between 39th and 41st will be opened as a traveled way to facilitate access to the Longacres Parkway. When this street is opened approximately 29 parking spaces currently available will be lost. (See Exhibits "A" and "B" for existing and proposed uses. Improvements to the new parking area will consist of grading, installation of peripheral sidewalks, installation of a drainage system, illumination, landscaping and irrigation, as required by Code. 12. The site is located in the south portion of Renton. It is bounded on the west by the Longacres Parkway and Springbrook Creek, on the north by S.W. 39th Street, on the east by Lind Avenue and on the south by S.W. 43rd Street. See attached vicinity map, Exhibit "D") . B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1 . EARTH c. The site was filled several years ago. The fill material was generally glacial till of the Alderwood series. There is a small area that is unfilled currently, but will be filled during grading operations. The area of the existing industrial park has been filled, graded, paved, and no additional grading is anticipated in this area. 2. AIR a. During construction there will be an increase in dust and exhaust emissions from construction equipment. I E III 2- After construction is completed approximately 2,000 additional vehicle trips per day will be generated from use on the site. Total traffic generation from the proposal is estimated at 5,084 trips per day. Emissions from these vehicles could be expected to be of the same type and substance which would normally be associated with these types of uses and are expected to be within the ambient air requirements of the City of Renton. 3. WATER a. Surface: 5. Discussions with the City of Renton indicate that the 100 year flood plain encroaches onto the site near the corner of S.W. 4lst Street and the Longacres Parkway. (See site plan) . 6. Grease, oil , dirt, and other materials common to the parking lot environment could enter the surface water system through the storm drain system. These impacts will be mitigated by the use of catch basins and oil separators to reduce the volume and quantity of contamination from the proposed parking area. No change in the discharge of materials from the paved areas of the Benaroya portion of the complex is expected. 4. PLANTS b. As previously stated, no physical changes with the exception of opening the street are proposed for the Benaroya portion of the site. The portion that the new parking areas will be constructed on will be cleared and grubbed in its entirety, however, since this area has been previously cleared and filled, most vegetation on the site has come up volunteer from wind blown seed. d. No changes in existing landscaping are proposed for the Benaroya portion of the complex. In those areas where no parking areas are proposed, landscaping will be in conformance with City of Renton requirements, including 5% of the site for landscape plantings, together with an additional 2% wildlife landscaping. In accordance with City of Renton requirements, all new landscaped areas will be irrigated. 5. ANIMALS d. 2% of the new parking area site will be landscaped in a manner to enhance wildlife habitation. No outward physical changes are proposed with regard to the existing facility. i i 3- 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. With regard to the new parking areas, energy requirements will include the illumination of the site during hours of darkness. It is anticipated that after working hours, the total site lighting will be reduced by 50% using time controls in an effort to reduce consumption. The change in the existing complex to include more office and laboratory space will increase the energy demand by the overall complex. c. As noted in (a) above, it is proposed to double circuit the lighting system so that after working hours the total amount of energy used would be reduced by approximately 50% providing only sufficient lighting for security purposes. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. 2) As a matter of general policy, all applicable measures are taken by the Company to protect the health of its employees at all times. b. Noise I ) The existing Benayora complex currently takes approximately 1 ,563 parking spaces. With the conversion of the use of the buildings together with the additional parking an increase in parking noise from the additional 1 ,000 parking spaces is anticipated. In addition, since there is a rail spur along the south line of the proposed parking site, and an additional spur between the boundaries of Lots 5 and 6 some railroad noise can be anticipated depending on the frequency of the train service to other buildings in the area. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. Land uses to the south, east, and west are currently office and industrial uses. The property to the north of the proposed site is currently vacant land. b. The proposed parking site may have been used for agriculture several years ago as is true of the Benaroya complex, however, given the filling and development into industrial use that has taken place, that use is now precluded. c. The portion in Parcel "C" currently has streets and utilities stubbed to the property and has been filled. The portion within the Benaroya complex consists of seven tilt-slab concrete structures which generally have a warehouse appearance on the exterior. d. No structures are proposed to be demolished. 2,848 people are expected to work in the complex at peak employment in April of 1986. i a 4- 10. AESTHETICS c. The proposed parking area will be landscaped and buffered with landscape berms, thus reducing the visual impact of the paving areas from the street. These mounds will be landscaped in compliance with City requirements. As this landscaping matures, visual impacts would be further reduced by the density of the landscaping berms. 11 . LIGHT AND GLARE a. The parking lot will be illuminated during the hours of use. Maximum intensity is estimated to be 1/2 ft. candle. The illuminaires will be of such a design as to direct the lighting onto the parking areas and to minimize the effects of glare to off-site properties. No changes are anticipated within the existing complex. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. The site is bounded by Longacres Parkway on the west, S.W. 43rd Street on the south, Lind Avenue on the east, and S.W. 39th on the north. In addition, internal circulation is provided by S.W. 41st Street and Raymond Avenue. The opening of access along Raymond Avenue will open the option of traffic entering or exiting the site from any one of the peripheral streets. 41st Street and 43rd Street provide access to the on and off ramps from SR 167 (the Valley Freeway) . Traffic west along 43rd Street would provide access to 1-5 and traffic north along Lind would provide access to 1-405 to Grady Way. b. The site is currently served by Metro Route #247. A new route #I63 is proposed to go into effect later in 1985. c. The proposed project will result in total parking spaces of 2,542. In the process of this proposed development, approximately 29 parking spaces will be lost (see Exhibit "C") . d. The proposed development will increase the traffic in the vicinity by approximately 2,000 trips per day. The opening of Raymond Avenue to public traffic will act to disperse the concentrations giving a variety of alternatives for access to abutting arterials. Some channelization may be appropriate at the intersection of S.W. 39th Street and Lind to facilitate left turns from Lind onto S.W. 39th Street. e. Railroad spurs currently service all areas of the site on easements which were drafted with the original plats. Utilization of these spurs as a result of this proposed development is not anticipated. Impacts on other transportation alternatives would be expected to be similar to those generated by any development of this type. I 5- f. Approximately 2,000 additional vehicle trips per day for a total of 5,084 vehicle trips per day could be expected to be generated on the site with full utilization of the parking areas. Peak volumes are expected to occur between 6:00 and 8:00 a.m. and 3:00 to 5:00 p.m. when people arrive at and depart from the facility. g. The occupant proposes that upon completion of the facility, if additional striping on Lind is necessary, this would be accomplished during the time of construction after consultation with the Traffic Engineering Division of the City of Renton Public Works Department. Additionally, there are ongoing discussions with the City concerning additional traffic signals in the area. It is proposed that these mitigating measures be worked out with the Public Works Department. I. a L 1 RENTON BENAR O YA COMPLEX LAB STRG vA STRG 21K 41K10E 11K OFF 85K a OFFICE 1 ' 75K 33.5K 7 7 81 5 o o 1 7-81.7 1 f l P 1 o f 3 1 1 U 1 r fi r7 81 1 fni c21J1 ill. 4111 / PTOIIT col U ia U L.i1ati U CT 1 I r FAB a 145.3K 104K STRG a e.. r 70K FAB STRG STRG 16R7K 114K STRG 98K STRG r- 38K FAB 82K FAB w 2K OFFICE w t 4 5 J 337.4K 1.81.1 7-81.2 7.81.3 r) n______,______f—%---n r 1-----r) 1.t. 46E1 STRICT SITE PLAN lb, EXISTING IC1lI . 1•014 I /r k It c c i I w I + 4 I I i RENTON BENAR O YA COMPLEX LAB OFFICE OFFICE vii OFFICE 21K 41K 96K 1117 OFFICE 75K S 33.5K 7814 71. 1815 w 1 1.7 If for loC7! 1r 1C7e161n r r u tl r....... 1, 1J L . 41CT 11 ITIIIIT LAB 50K FAB 145.3K STRG STRG 53K w 16.7K 165K STRG 98K STRG 82K FAB STRG STRG H 2K OFFICE 0 V J v i 33`1'4K FAB 4 70K r LS 1811 7.81.1 1.81-3 il--/-1 r) n__---r—l----n r c1=2,1 I,r, 411U ITIIIIT SITE PLAN tit PROPOSED ICALI i MOMI of I I, 11 I-- i i ..-. i i I i EXHIBIT "C" BOEING AEROSPACE COMPANY PARKING SPACE CALCULATIONS Fiu i I d i ng Use PropQped Arep _Park ing Space Lab 71,000 SF 71 Office 247,500 SF 1,237.5 Fabrication 297,300 SF 297.3 Storage 670, 100 SF 446.73 Total = 2,052.53=72053 spaces required. Spaces Provided; Existing Facility: 1 ,534 spaces Vew Facility 980 spaces 4otorcyc I es 28 spaces Total Spaces 2,542 spaces 1aa16:BAC A i I i tiotn s NO1 P•1 1111 440 S sw tirltn 405 ISTI " r \\ LONGACRES YI IIRAC TRACKA,C,K Lai el Q SSW 27th ST ri ill a SW 3 ST. W .n 0 ZCC1 J 3 W Y 0 a SW 34th ST ca m z6J SW 38th ST W 39th ST J i J i Sw 4Idt ST SITE 'co-.* SW 43rd ST T VICINITY MAP Not To Scots EXHIBIT "D" I I I CITY Or;RENTON area Sterner Lighting Systems LR E V O maldwayo JUL 121985 walkway Executive II BUILDING/ZQINING DEPT, The EXECUTIVE II is a classic design nect, capacitor, ballast, socket, lamp The fact that EXECUTIVE II is one of with outstanding lighting efficiency. and hydro-formed reflector in a single, our top selling luminaires is not sur- It offers precise light control, plus hinged and removable module. prising. It provides a total lighting Sterner's Unitized Ballast/Reflector All this inside a luminaire with the package flexible enough to meet many Assembly for easy installation and strong, clean, rectilinear lines that of the most demanding lighting maintenance. This is a complete sys- make it versatile enough to fit many requirements. tern, including primary quick discon- settings. J 1f 1 Short Form Ordering Guide To facilitate easy ordering we have provided all of the information you need on these two pages (2 and 3) to order our "standard" Executive II luminaire. Pole and Finish selections have been abbreviated to include only the sizes and finishes that are most in demand. To order, just follow the three time-saving steps shown at right. IMPORTANT! If more data on materials, options, finishes or pole sizes is required, please see complete listings in Section 8 Poles or Section 14 Color Chart. 1 ORDERING INFORMATION Obtain the catalog number for the luminaire series which fits your requirements. Select, in sequence, a code for each feature from those listed in the format illustrated below. EXAMPLE: i; 44/ 4`:,) et 1 t-4' 0 4i- c4-, e i .e... (4. 10 JA, O v S QF OQ QQJOv i ET 20 NOTE A NOTE B NOTE C SPECIFY NOTE 120 277 See SECTION 8 for 25 LAMP D 208 480 pole selection or WATTAGE 240 VND* SECTION 12 for brackets. NOTE A NOTE C NOTE D AO—Clear Patterned Glass P—Photoelectric Control Receptacle M—Mercury Vapor standard) - AC—Fused Terminal Block H— Metal Halide A—Clear Glass HS—House Side Cut-off Shield S— High Pressure Sodium TF—Tilt Fitter I — Incandescent NOTE B N —Options Not Desired 10 —Single 28—2 @ 180° 29-2@90° 32—3 @ 120° 39 —3 @ 90° 49—4 @ 90° Voltage Not Determined WIND LOAD RATING TABLE J Luminaire Luminaire Number& Size Spacing C] I 1 ;__t I I 10 28 29 32 39 49 Single 2 @ 90° L 10 29 20 3 5 5 6 6 7 25 4 8 8 10 10 14 2 @ 180°3 @ 90. 4 @ 90° 28 39 49 r, 1 Determine luminaire requirements. Select, in sequence, the code for each luminaire feature from those listed under step number one. Example:ET 25 AO 10 P 400 S 120 2 Determine pole height, shape and material. Find the corresponding code in the chart under step num- ber two and add it to luminaire code. Example: ET 25 AO 10 P 400 S 120 RTS05-H- Note: For wall bracket information see Section 12) 3 Determine luminaire and pole finish. Select desired finish from chart under step number three and add it to luminaire code. Example: ET 25 AD 10 P 400 S 120 RTS05-H-N 2 POLES Poles include anchor base (surface hinged bases for 15' and 20' aluminum poles), prewiring. anchor bolts, and a baked enamel or hard-coat anodic finish. 15' 20' 25' 30' 40' Round Tapered RTA06-C- RTA11-C- RTA13-B- RTA16-B- RTA23-B- Aluminum load rating load rating load rating 10 load rating 9 load rating 14 16 10 RTA14-B- RTA17-B- load rating 15 load rating 14 Square SSA18-E- SSA25-E- SSA27-D- SSA28-D- Straight load rating load rating load rating 14 load rating 14 N.A. Aluminum 8 8 SSA19-E- SSA26-E- load rating load rating 16 27 Round Tapered RTS03-H- RTSO4-H- RTS05-H- RTS06-H- RTS08-H- Steel load rating load rating load rating load rating load rating 18 27 37 32 30 Square STS03-P- STSO4-P- STS05-P- STS06-P- STS12-P- Tapered load rating load rating load rating load rating load rating Steel 46 30 26 23 16 r r 3 MATERIAL FINISHES Baked enamel:An electro-statically applied acrylic finish deposited on the metal and baked in an oven to harden and cure the coating. Anodic:An extremely hard finish indigenous to the metal. Baked Enamel Anodic Light Bronze (311) A M Medium Bronze (312) B N Dark Bronze(313) C P Black E Q Natural Aluminum G R If a finish coat is not required, insert the following code for the type of pole specified: AD—Red Oxide Primer For Steel AC—Brushed Satin Finish For Aluminum If the color or finish is not known, insert the following in the catalog number: NK—Not Known 1 1 DIMENSIONS Recommended Luminaire Standard Mounting Wattage Size Arm Height EXECUTIVE II 20 up to 200 watts 16"x20"x6" 2"x4"-8"7'6"to 20' EXECUTIVE II 25 up to 400 watts 20"x25"x8" 21/4"x6"-12" 15'to 40' Mechanical Features Unitized ballast/reflector system. Hinged and removable as a unit. Easy access for installation and mainte- nance.. Thermal and impact tempered glass lens. Extruded aluminum arm with galvanized steel threaded tie rods. Continuous extruded aluminum lens frame with tubular silicone gasketing for weathertight seal. Photometric Flexibility The EXECUTIVE II takes lamps of 70 to 400 watts, depending on luminaire size. Providing excellent photo- metric control, a die-formed, semi-specular reflector system, except in 200-watt size, are field-adjustable for selection of standard I.E.S. patterns II and III. (Photometric data is found in SECTION 14, Technical Informa- tion.) Designed and manufactured to meet or exceed U.L. and N.E.C. requirements, all fixtures bear the I.B.E.W. and U.L. label. Options photoelectric control receptacle fused terminal block single or duplex weatherproof receptacle lumi- naires can be wall mounted (see SECTION 12) I baked enamel or anodic hard coat finishes available in a wide range of colors (see SECTION 14) pole materials: aluminum, steel, concrete, wood, wood-laid pole cross-sections: round, square, hexagonal, octagonal pole profiles: straight or tapered, depending on lumi- naire specifications (For specific details on poles, see SECTION 8, Poles) WOODLITE styles available (See SECTION 11, WOODLITE) UNITIZED BALLAST/REFLECTOR ASSEMBLY is hinged and removable for quick connect and disconnect. Canopy Housing formed aluminumextrudedaluminum Lampholder Grip-Tite" mogul socket Gasket I weather-seal silicone Lens Tie Rods tempered glass galvanized steel Door Frame extruded aluminum 44 6" 41- .1001Arm cross-section i-+- 214"-j Optional Adjustable Tilt Fitter C r 1 1 The Total Lighting Package, a a Sterner Exclusive 1411111‘''' Leave it to Sterner to build this many exclusive f features into one good looking and functional fixture. The EXECUTIVE II is truly a total package, offering outstanding energy efficiency, long lasting perform- ance, easy and economical installation and mainte- nance. Only Sterner offers all these unique features in one clean, flexible design: Efficient Photometric Performance: Cut-off Types II and III field adjustable. Specifically designed for the energy efficient 150, 200, 250, and 400 watt high pressure sodium lamps. See Section 14 for complete, accurate, supported data on all HID lamps. prO '',1 I., r" 44 a- I- Alik‘ 4 1.--- z.....3. 4; 110P` A Automatic Primary Disconnect: Operates when UBR—Unitized Ballast/Reflector Assembly: Com- door is opened—includes fusing for additional plete optical and electric components are hinged safety.and removable as a unit for easy installation and maintenance. Ballast also removable as a unit. E=34450 4 3r11. 0 UNDERWRITERS l i. t LABORATORIES ince r • ` I ELECTRIC FIXTURE ISSUE NO. D-29,588 SUITABLE FORS Tz WET LOCATIONS PRINTED IN U.S.A. Extruded Aluminum Housing: One-piece miter U.L.: Entire fixture listed "Suitable for use in wet bend sidewall construction, with canopy perma- location." nently sealed and welded in place. Entire housing factory finished with Electro-Statically applied, oven baked, textured enamel finish. r • I 1 V i‘ Maintenance Without Tools: Complete mainte- Sealed Optical: One-piece hydro-formed semi- nance may be performed without the use of tools. specular reflector is hinged and sealed against a one piece silicone gasket. i` 4 a Tempered Glass: Both heat and impact resistant. Extruded Aluminum Door Frame Assembly: Accu- Available with clear or highly efficient, slightly rately mitered, and permanently secured with ex- diffusing, clear crystal glass. truded internal corner keys. tr r z . '4' , '''.':-' 1 ' Ear' 11r....., . -;------zi„,1,:<' f114 '''' -..-:„:3; ,- .:V' t 1, I , t% -*,.. f...... . i_7- l w.k.:r •- -,-N ., 4 (> 42--- - N tt: 4'n 7. 4. Computer Service: Sterner can provide a com- puterized layout service from verifying your cal- culations to providing a complete point-by-point project print out. i i f "Mil CIIIPP 1., 1 01-ii, 4 t IL :. Liki, I7-...7 4.....„ i..„.. k frri ,i• h . . , . 7-Fi f 10, d Al iil •7-..1c.11.t Iftni: it:„ iii,,..:, :, • ": .,747• ..." l'c II'. 10 lit".1 '-'-1,: i'-'-',.-"-- •"*.;%•:, ...,. .,!;: •'. ;._ .41 i„. • .i• .,:ii••.:- 61 ',.. li 11, i 1 '. — 1 .. 4 11 .,,041-...,. .,•'• —•,-:•::•-' ''-ci,•. 1,0,1itAriti_i_1_,j _ • 1I,, . - : imis icromimoma'- ' ^ r.-.-----.••• sm...-mv--dm an 440ie.-,,....t......,.,:;.,...........''i-i,;v4;-%-•,.•:-.....-.-.1.----,, ..,;.;..11...,....-,-;.....4 F-x ' i..IL/ i 1 r'' ._, ig. t. . - „...._.• -; , ). , -4, 2.. i . oil le I 4,Ili;,.-ti !!t iinirl". .. 2 IfAli i 1 1 1 .. ji.or- •7,...I411F1-'.- • . L. - - ''''''' • 4,. , as t o i.„:8,-;. r...? x.:10!LL • p. ,r , 1 - 0.--,z•---••.__ vrs-ra 0,02............,_...,.......... 7 ,...."'''-r...---•-----.' i fir• ;,. jt.YYY 4 .V.T1110114 II ,;4' IT p,‘,. , ft •Z iiiit4 _,,,44 oe, I a 1 I 0 •.... A ji Z l I i t .r i, NJ It 1_,- . 11..„ , , . • Ili• O ' 4444444 i. t ,,,a. , y tj1fM r . . .4, t7 '.. 1` 11_ .l A' ~fir, i , it r .. r :i-AW .r 4 .". .., friv.,„ ,• 44-, 1 ,, „,ty - . , ,,,....h, ... ..• . 4.. - a , 4 --•-.------- 1 6 .$.- ts, .1 :.v •'I• jl a.:.4 - tit rT,.._.ra_:,..._„ v„..:r..;1.,sztrtr " .. ,E,,,. ,,,,^4}.. •„TM:. , •.4r' VV. SAMPLE SPECIFICATION Executive II The luminaire sidewalls shall be mitre-bend con- is opened,the ballast primary circuit is broken,there- struction from a single piece of aluminum extru- by allowing the fixture to be serviced without shock sion, alloy 6063-T6. Crowned aluminum sheet can- hazard. Lamp socket to have nickel plated current opy spot-welded and sealed to housing. Finish on carrying parts with lamp grip. Ballast components housing shall be Lens encased with mounted on a separate panel having quick-release extruded aluminum door frame sealed with a sili- fasteners. Ballast shall be capable of starting cone gasket. Door frame assembly shall be remov- type of lamp of watts atvoltage down able. The door to be hinged with stainless steel pins to —20°F. The 200°C, 600-volt insulated wiring shall and retained with quick release safety latch. Sealed be installed between the ballast components and the reflector system to prevent entrance of dust or mois- socket. The flat lens shall be thermal and impact ture. Reflector is precision hydro-formed aluminum, tempered plate glass. The standard arm assembly chemically brightened and anodized to semi-specular shall be a rectangular aluminum extrusion complete finish. Reflector system is factory pre-set to provide with non-slip tie rod channels serving as a compres- standard I.E.S. distribution patterns II and III, and sion member with two threaded and galvanized steel field adjustable by socket location. Reflector system tie rods and lock nuts in tension between pole and hinged and latched to gasketed door frame for easy luminaire. The luminaire shall bear the listing mark of cleaning or removal. A fused disconnect shall be fur- Underwriters Laboratory. "Fixtures suitable for wet nished inside the fixture so that when the door frame locations." STERNER LIGHTING SYSTEMS INCORPORATED Winsted, Minnesota 55395 (612) 485-2141 • Minneapolis Phone (612) 473-1251 College Point(Long Island), New York 11356 (212) 358-5655 Printed in U.S.A. i Y ESM inc. A CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEY, AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT CONSULTING FIRM July 10, 1985 CITY OP RENTON 15P V.1 D Hearing Examiner JUL 12 1985 City of Renton BUILDING/ZONING DEPT.200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Wa 98055 Re: Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Approval Boeing Aerospace Company Dear Sir: In support of the application of the Boeing Aerospace Company for site plan approval and a Conditional Use Permit for the site bounded by the Longacres Parkway on the west, S.W. 4lst on the south, Lind Avenue on the east, and S.W. 39th on the north, we offer the following information for your consideration: A. LOTIT e lye .PI The proposed use is compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, current Zoning Ordinances and requirements of the City of Renton. The buildings in question are constructed on site. At this time the proposed Conditional Use Permit will add necessary parking to facilitate the conversion of a portion of the buildings into office space and laboratory areas. No changes to the outside features of the buildings are proposed. The original construction was in compliance with the requirements of the existing Comprehensive Plan. The current zoning for the property in question is M-P. The proposed uses, as shown in Exhibit "B" are an outright permitted use under the existing zoning. B• c.gmni C1 i tvNegri. The conversion of this property from warehousing to the proposed use will provide employment for additional members of the community with the associated increase in the business levels in the community, increasing the income to the City by taxes and, in general , enhancing the economic and social environment of the City of Renton. 451 Southwest 10th Street Suite 106 Renton Washington,98055 206)228-5628 s a Hearing Examiner July 10, 1985 Page Two C. Effect op lqi.@cgnf ...Ptu.er- e As noted above, the property is currently zoned M-P. Existing uses in the general vicinity are of an industrial nature or vacant land. Additionally, butting lands are zoned M-P which means that the proposed use is compatible with the existing uses or possible uses on vacant lands in the vicinity. D. fsavgibaLLY The proposed use is compatible with the uses in the neighborhood in that the existing and proposed uses in the vicinity are M-P and the proposed use is an outright permitted use in the M-P zoning. E. Erss.g The additional parking which is proposed to be constructed is specifically required under paragraph C of the City of Renton Zoning Code concerning offstreet parking. Exhibit "C" of the attachments to the Environmental Checklist provides a breakdown of the proposed uses within various structures and the associated parking spaces required by the Code. It should be noted that 2,053 spaces are required and 2,542 spaces are provided. F. j The Boeing Aerospace Company proposes to open access along Raymond Avenue South to enhance vehicular and pedestrian access through and around the site. This will provide access to S.W. 43rd Street, to the Longacres Parkway, S.W. 4lst Street, and Lind Street, as well as direct access to Lind Street from S.W. 39th Street. G. !&Jse4 .Glare Potential noise, light, and glare impacts are reviewed in the Environmental Checklist in some detail . Potential noise will be from traffic to and from the site, which will occur in the morning and afternoon hours as employees arrived at and depart from the parking areas. Given the industrial use of the area, this is not expected to create a potential noise that would exceed those allowed by appropriate Noise Ordinances. ti Hearing Examiner July 10, 1985 Page Three It should be noted that light and glare will be controlled by use of directional luminaires within the parking areas and it should be further noted that the lighting system will be double circuited to allow 50 percent of the lumminaires to be turned off during times when a level of 1/2' candle is not required. The result will be that except at times when employees are on the site, approximately 50 percent of the luminaires will be turned off to reduce glare and save energy. This level of lighting will provide lighting for security purposes only. H. d gep inq Within the existing facility no changes in the landscape are proposed. Within the area that is proposed to be constructed as a new parking area, 5% landscaping or more will be provided. Additionally, 2% of the site will be landscaped in such a manner to enhance wildlife habitat, all in conformance with the requirements of the appropriate Ordinances of the City ofRenton. Ag9550C .1sg3 No accessory uses, as defined by Code, are proposed under this proposal . J. S.QD..P sIoD The existing structures are being converted from mostly storage and warehouse facilities to increase office and electronics laboratory uses. This application for the Conditional Use Permit and site plan approval of the parking area is being made in compliance with the requirements of the City of Renton Code. K. LnpL KLeCLts The proposed improvement requires no improvements to existing public facilities, utilities, and services and no public improvements are anticipated to be required. The Boeing Aerospace Company is currently working with the Traffic Division to provide additional signalization in the general vicinity of the site and has proposed to provide striping and left turn pockets should they be necessary at the intersection of S.W. 39th and Lind Avenue to facilitate left turn movements into the parking areas. Hearing Examiner July 10, 1985 Page Four Based on the above, we feel that the proposed Conditional Use Permit should be granted in that it is in compliance with each and every requirement of the City of Renton Code with regard to Conditional Use Permits, provides a major benefit to the economic well being of the community, is in strict compliance with the requirements of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code of the City of Renton and is, in fact, an outright permitted use for this property. Very truly yours, NC. ROBERT O. SCHOLES, P.E. President ellCrovv mpany _ - . . - . - . 5601 Sixth Avenue South P.O. Box 80326 Seattle, Washington 98108 July 3, 1985 J U L 9 - 1985 206/762-4750 ESM, INC. Boeing Aerospace Company Facilities Department P. 0. Box 3999, MS 89-02 Seattle, Washington 98124 Attention: Mr. Bruce D. Zimmerman Re: Letter of Authority Gentlemen: It is our understanding that in connection with your ground lease development of the S. W. 39th Street parking lot, owned by Burlington Northern Railroad, you intend to file a master application, a conditional use permit, site plan approval , and environmental checklist, with the City of Renton. The property with which we are concerned was formerly called Benaroya Business Park - Renton and is currently owned by Pacific Northwest Group A. The legal description of this property is attached as Exhibit A. As a condition of filing the above documents, it is our understanding that the owner or authorized representative of the owner must sign the applications. This letter hereby authorizes Mr. Bruce D. Zimmerman, Facilities Department, Boeing Aerospace Company, to act on authority of Pacific Northwest Group A only with regard to the applications noted above, to be submitted to the City of Renton. Very truly yours, PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP Al— a joi entur / Bruce E. Hosfory Partner CITY 07.RED`TON FR:r1) r- PYI d JUL 12 1985 la BUILDING/ZONING DEPT 1 0 0 • S Glacier Park Company ffl REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT A SUBSIDIARY OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC. June 27, 1985 Boeing Aerospace Company Facilities Department P. O. Box 3999, MS 89-02 Seattle, Washington 98124 Attention: Mr. Bruce D. Zimmerman Re: Letter of Authority Gentlemen: It is our understanding that in connection with your ground lease development of the S. W. 39th Street parking lot, you intend to file a master application, a conditional use permit, site plan approval , and environmental checklist, with the City of Renton. The property in question, which is currently held in fee ownership by Burlington Northern Railroad Properties Inc. concerns lots 4 (portion thereof) , 5, and 6 of the Burlington Northern Industrial Park of Renton, Division II , as filed for record in Volume III , page S 42-44 of Plats, Records of King County. As a condition of filing the above documents, it is our understanding that the owner or authorized representative of the owner must sign the applications. This letter hereby authorizes Mr. Bruce D. Zimmerman, Facilities Department, Boeing Aerospace Company, to act on authority of the Glacier Park Company in its capacity on behalf of the owner in fee title of the above described property with regard to the applications noted above, to be submitted to the City of Renton. Very truly yours, GLACIER PARK COMPANY on behalf of Burlington Northern Properties Inc. Er: 14::E:: ames Warren Cook Sr. Corporate Counsel cc: ESM, Inc. Myrna Brune 2.5.33 1011 Western Avenue, Suite 700 • Seattle, Washington 98104 • 206 625-6300 CITY OF R TON Nr \ail . JUL 121985 i BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. A 1, NDING1' OF FILE FILE TITLE r) fit166:11107°L1 1114 , 4. yet Ar 1\ 4*\ ro• 401111014,,* w • 441/4. 1„ I, e.K 1