Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA78-225 (2)
1. t,..,--.,,-, ,,,,_, • - • • • . 4.i„.„,„........ 00-1-10 401111‘ ii, pi,„..,E ii,.41 ,-,,,, 7 i- 1" 14.- . c i . 1 1. 1C:.:) a,. ,, , N., ; oniqivirt' ' la !- 7." i ..,..., 1 ,':-,.' ..... .., _ LTI....„--T., ,... ..------- ...-'-‘ f-- ----.. --..,... 7 i migim000000.•••••1 r u 4 S I midi, k N, 16, rat 1 - 4- 11). ' J , N , 1 ICI 1 I i i y2, II, it,...r. 1--11"." Pr/i, / / 1 1. 146 - 1 -51 1 3- 1__:.--1--:------ i /.. .. o 40 ! r I O'ajiiii-- , 3e- ' I . ' - 4RIL 1 AOC 411JelW rA4L(11 V ' ikl(A561) 611004 t i‘j Cit12 1 'S F rg. S S • i ( w" , gy S p 2 r 4 f; iNfl/ )( i513 I will 11:' 1 , .1. .i 341_15.P' t - '1"-a t 41 7 l 6 f flLLIewl1133 J • _ .. - 1 A\ 1, . J P, i r ,p T 1. l -fit aI. al 31 I I 1 I RECEIVED 1- ' 59 `i0 h1 l-s- tt 3 1' a-{ ,` 1 s 9 CO I • _ ' i r 4 1 O' R j 7CITYOFRENTONbd , y 4 S. 5. 1 • - s 1 j 9 IIMlIlll.IIlIllIl1llllI.11I1IMllI1IMIllIll.l..11IIIIlllIIIl.IIMllIMl.I.IlI........M...MM...MMMm.. 7 HEARING EXAMINER Y j if•-I OCr 2 1978 9 5O s '' J a 9 f, K 1 TF y' y A 1 ' 1.1718t91f0r11t12r1r2r3r4r51C x7 1 ;i, TrhOhi\I O! • 9 7r el 1 _............,..--.-.1 Li....i .:_ 3 ,q5. 0 I III yi 1, .,.__!Iill AIL 1 1 S ki In a 14 A r ,._ ._Vl \' J 14 I 1 i ti s6 a s i 9 1 ,.._ , . , y, 4 • . .ia l P 15 q1 . l .• - .n .:!e XHIBIT NO •• 3„, N 2Z -18 • TEM No A - ; WIWI fiii.1 i. dit.ii 1 V'\ to , I, - 05.-p:f.-:! . i .---- • : :., ..,., j II1-.-_. , - - • cf-:----r- I I 15 I... I' 1, • r• . ' . r- i i ''' B . c., I '‹-, /4.-i• l' - i -1--2;•':' .' •-. r. i...''N./.-7•1\ •,...• . ' --.e.,:-----023 - 7 --i• I. li ;.•_' . I 0 z.:-,;,•-•--r-•• ,...- ii -t•1/4.) j NI:: -., ----'!'"-- i 5 .. 1 _ ,• • •kl-• ''• •efiti9-7-7v-.-•,...--- --, 1-?..-1 iv"- 1 --cn;= - r 54- i 76 1--- ', ., • • .._ ir ... , - ' Y. 0. 4 ' •I : -7 il '• - •e, vim - , - _ :r1 7 :-, ..l'' • '4t, . • „ - - te--‘i.,•..:Wg-ri-r-r.7.-t. • . 0 1" ,....,!- . i :i., _ . ., 6.64- ,7-,, I . A 3. 1 . 4 0 ••..; ...,•-•-.. A7.-, ._-... I .-e,-.41: .-,-;,i-...•-• . ---- . 1,..,-27-41 ,1.V ze"..1 r•it,,ic,:.1„..:..:i.,. .•I e. .1.-,,., .- ,,.. .•,•.. , . A -,:: .• - -, ,-. - . ,, ..- ,- . -.... .r. ,,- I , .--' . - - ::-. -.--,-6* -,,.. .- - 4-..:,.-c.7 A(7 1-•-•;:7.1-5 ITT"'' ' I°.' '., .. , - .•;-...77-'-' :' ; I 4 I- '„A 4'571 --' 1:,...1 07,1: 3. C‹, .."..; 4 ' f I :- b-r • r ' Cf. • A A V- " - .Ir. r. -• • -' i,' IV -3514c)- i .. .. ...._ . i ' 4;t:13'R:-,r•':-;4::',";".*::i 5.• %1 -: . -. '-.• - •. • • - i:" 1-..• b 2,=•,V4,..-,i's-I. 1- 7.--,4- -.--, -,,-- .2.-,---- -- ,:.:•-•14) 1 , r- h. . _ t.: q e...,..., , ,...;7, Ii4 55is.r-3 . - •-_. '_ _ --:--.., • • . 1, s.1..e. ii-4.„ :: . .-•I r• • Pe : Q. - •-- -- 1 - .., 34. r,':414,34,-,S..;:2-,,,t:.:f-il-V :- .-..:•:,-• •.-.:-:--.;4:.:: --,--" . .- e. •.-:- .: l'.......: t7flj 3Z. 3' .. . „ :: • - -.- : - .-- • \-..-.' : .-. : - -'- - -:•-• k ,-7-7,r*"..Tr.x,..'4.,'''-',Zt:','--.:4:1'.I'' '::, fr:.-'1: •'' It .-.....%."--*-''' ;.r".. . .".- 4,..p...; ...:1. ., -.., 1 --I- - -,-_ .-. ' • • - .,--,4-.'..-- - ,---..__ - - ..c...-,1'--7- - i . -.-, ..: - - -.5 . .-,- -•- „6.'4:4, ,:' ' i\-':-.-47.-.;'-.-'.. •-•-i:•.'- . :-..' - , ,,.,. . , • ' -. ,-_,,',7.' „ :' -„,_ 1,-4._ .-''_----- , ..•; = :' 1114 , : ,---, '-•." -.: e49..-•-•:, - --.- '17- '.' -.--- -- , .-.., --.-'',•:7:'';.-..'::.-^,5:::-.,„. . 1 , .A ., ',.: ,,-.--,-., :. • 2•-•-•,-- ,:-. .,..- ,--', .1 I • 1;ei.'7':-•t7P- :- '-`7 :::-':'------:: -.- - '- -: •••- .,.-•-; - • , - --,--- .714 .;,•- -.•'---',' ' -'-; - E/1 6-"r , -- :-- : ..-'-- - • =---:•-:•"--• - -_--L.: --;".'.-:- - " • . - , 1 L.-- ,---r-.1 _ ,- .,••1 ., - 4. -... . le • 1 1., .,--,'-‘,41- , ,..i.p.., •,..t.‘,::4....,......: -. - , -: •..- .-'.:--- 74--. "56 •:,1: .. .. ;...:.--,•:-'7.,• - - . "_,•:.•:_•:-„,:•:,-'.- ' ,. -..-' - ;:: --;.... • I ' - -,754-!.: • - -'" .....- -1-7-•--', i' -.-',-"-. 44: - '- ,'I1 -''-:*'-'t:-..:-:'-'' --•,' .:_;• 1-•-:.'• :: ati. . '4,-----`•:?' f-,-4' •.-.1.:',.: - . • :- / ••• •-• -17:- • . -.--_-:-= ', •-. :-_-; • -. -: : - -- - -: • • 2,_.,-V ,.-• _ - - L:----- ;1_ . ' , ., IL- .. s..- Ir' -'. "',.-t,tf,r: -:--.1,..,-,. -;',.1:::,'„,,,I, 7.,..;:', ts-$. , - ., •:-....,;•,,_.,, -_ __ .. .• ',.---.-.:-:"--S., •••:-.-...-.,• •;---:,--,-:,-" :••••-:-..----: ,',-'••••'-•-:7 ---,, ,r5 ..."-.•-•'.. '•• ;•'''f'-' --..;-.E-,„---- :: - , ."-•••,...:1":. - L:-.;:s„.•,..----------- 7---i• ",,,,,..---, ...-.•,,:•441.ic-ilr.,3•,,.-3 -,-. - 4,-- -'-',4-„,-.1::',..,..',....•--:„.n=:•-:-:;-f - -.. ...- ,;--::,,:t!--.-.--'. ,q -..',•-•',-;.-,„. ":''.:-.;‘.. s..-• .';',--.':",..-:,:-.••,..,,,:;'---- - si,..°3° • -;-•-' i-,, 5- 2..-r- .._. • ••,',,,,,-•1-'.P., :e.- ' : -.•'.-_,, - .:•':-..,. .,--•-••,,,•140,4,,,,,-,..n--..k,,2.,,,J,•tb„,-:-,.- .•,.:„.,...,,- .f:.•:,,, --,...- ,• .:,:-::,,, ,-.:,.,.7,-:-••,;,=-_„-•:•:„•••••--,-,..... ,,,. :-.,-;,--..,-!•..,,-a.,-._,_-;;;,,-,1-• "--;._,:.;•--,-_-:,,--,...,-,_ :5,.._16,•,_ ,•- ",.,,, zii,1;,c. . ,7..,__ ,, 7 J.._ •,:,,:-•-_, . r-_,, - _ •-:: 41,114-, ,"-'-dt ,t-' - -_„,-;.-•'. :•=•,-,i'F-:--:-;',-•;:':--•--,:";•`-'.t,•-;-••-•,.••,-'••-,-:-., , -=. :•.,,• : :.-,= •, .10, ,:,-,',- . , .- ,--. . ''' ' • .- ' ... _:-- __ DI EL-'7- 4 .4": 2' 2. 0,•-•.... 1''''F,',,--'t7LcH*-----:.-,;,,,4i,„::':::. :::.--'-,:.-:,-.--,::..'..-1::._',:'-;.1-:,:.-,,,• .]:.-i-.7:•.:••-,. 7.: :::•-:,:.:,-.,-4::,„'s, i'-' 17.':i..,.;.5.T.:...-:,....:' L'i.j..,...:,;•: 1:-.:., ,,,,',1;-• '-'-‘0--- e•::-. i,'--oo".,'",H-•"-•'-:._,./'..-: ::.,:_ i', H1,-.--'=:-,. 1 ‘'-_-:,,,.. i:, 911'• . •:::p. 717y,-,,z. ;,...,---;-:•... .r.t:-.A_-,,,,-,--,-,..---...: -,'• -•.:. --1-..-.::::::-:i-'-.-•.'ct.,_5,i,k-i:-.. .iN7.:,•-•,-,!....5.1.,--•:;',.'•-- :.--11:,:.--"'-'.'":-...' -'. --..,':, -- 4'.'-.P, it:••-1:- .. -o . ,. ..', , , --. •.: -.,-_„, - .1, - - -I -- - • i•2•:--.---';:!--?:::,,,--v,:i:`;:i?.',..,,-.-. i.l. ,..:',,,-_- ,;-„,_, - . .. ,... 44tt .' . - - :-• V .:.-----'----'. ' - . ' -- ' Pi . '4,0, .30;4::--.--.:-Y4.,-. 4-:-•.:-.:-;• .- - 7- 4.:.1.4 : '.'1‘' i''''.'"' '. ::‘.,e,,, s:-... .---:.1.,..,,,..c.,-,..-.-4 ''.,-.,.; ".;,. • ..,;‘,t, = •',40 • .„- 7-- • • i• - • • •: . ,..----r•-**-V t ,1- , •. :.-.. , i - l', 4Z -4 Air(' "'•-. 1,-. ° 4 2---',-•:'-.:„Ar.,;•=-.'; •',--.--,-f•-•''t '...-- • -.E--.!Y.!, -:--: :.., 6,4 IN:1':-..,:-. . :'.':" !, IP.. ; •'. . ,--.'• - - • . - :1' -.;,- ":',..- ,.. ,..-f - _.4.-;----- - '- -1,i 45" 1 1 . I '':': - . ' b. • . J-.4-,`--.,-4.:-:,.=2--:--?'-- 7:-1- f-74.--1 - ----. ---.:-.-.-X-.g:J:-!'• ---'.--.:1.:4,--•7'-71-y-i.:i.- ffir_4,:ifi,f:,.., -1-;....;,-:..:- -,;"!:,:. -,-,,:7.2 r ' ....... ., 1 -,' .. ,.' -• .i••D ' 3 1.--s;;"--- 4--.. r t:1 4.i-,,,it,-(1,V.I.I',1,-;',.C._,,,,"-:bs-,;',.,,;4. ,,;(-:i-::. 1NLi, -::::' --,2. 11.1 • I- • A 4--' 2.- rt-pf -c)- • • i -' 0 . 3 135 i1-.41:,1;,,q'•••;r: ..I., :_:.•-•-;.-. ',-'113: .--'1k. -': . • , ' .-'". • . :-. -,•:,•_ . • ! _ - > 0 i. --0' 1 j.-2 3: .- b-:--.-----;:---% ; .v/•• 41 •-,1 / i _ - :2_,-....------ti' •‘31". '_.-. ,--- r- 1 ,-;;--0 5‘• 43 .7; --g-F-;;''';'-i_4i. '4";-I s'• ....H.;',41-•i.-..•';I'-- ..- •. . r. -•. ': '- . .,'.:.- 0 . , - ''' : - .-x, ii.:::,."_,:z,,1:-.':cl:\.-.11 4 '-'-,' :..';-'',.,..: -.. ,-.-- •'-';:. i • f ',- i- 9 • ' -1 Pi° v• . 1-.,1-0 , 1 f I i ••:,"21.0;,,:i.-;:,44 .. -.-• 'Jr'----:;:.'i -'' -, -7 . ..• . --'i: •'•-.• .„-„,..-,.,-'.'2' ' ,.... . i . C . • ' P• 12 ' f sr , - . ' D; •••/ i; 15 1 1 1. -0. '-'''''' :1.-•:-. •i' ;.'„...7-- 2 41' (1-- .1- L.--• . r ,oz. • ,-, •• t.4-5 . th I 4*-•: 1i 0 • 1 l'" ,.. y.a- s--'-r--r- 111. a ..u. ,.....4-" -1 i- ., ii-c,--'' ,Z,.. ',... 1„..; -,•-'. , .---- ,P : . k 4,----1- 77.7 1 .. 4 i- V 3f f .4.,;.14 .'4•1 •• c:',.._.„•.-:,+,,it-,...--_. J,-:•• ' • • . - -• .-.. 5.•: 7,. 5-8, [5: . • . __ ,-to 1. • i . --- Lejz. .55 1 •I.L. j______ v_i .. ,___ ___ 4-9- •- i 1i,. : _,_J. '--- • ye...r..... 1 1 •- • NJ• 3-r---:'T 1..c. tifj r511 , i i a _,„ a 1 7 1 f2- i " i - 1-.-- ' 1. 61 i 0 i, • I V 1 4 I 1 • 4-, 11 10-J--------- pl tt 11"• 1• 51• -.---. tr. •i 0 1._._ ________.........---' 1"---------..------- ;j.;9 , :,:ii.A. it, -,, 14- A, r t .. .1.:. .1, ,,J, sr4 ;'..r- %k -1 I. --•----I '':7- ' ' - ' -:,; u:',I ' i o7512;-- _ CL- r 01 . b6if 1,.._.- qull-'90 . :-.. ......i . ; , nr ,, . 1.-----f 0 .. 5 - `F-, I ......__,_:_.----. L---- ' V X- I . .0. _ i e 01-,. .634‹:Ia.77-- • • .' 1:. -0-i . ,--- .. ---. • .,p.' ,- - 4 '5° .:1.45.'3 9 . : 0 Ir. • r- ' ' - - •t,t3 f-i . • --i. 6,, - 64 ty c, 1, 40( .*.> ei,,. .s -. -- -:, to :,-9 ,_.fik.,-.;,..._ • , F.-, ---- . . -ik - ,i 51'1 i: ,''.0)..,-,',.,::: .-.-•••1 i ! 7.1 , - ',_.'- :- 3 41 -. ._ es', h , licf: 14.. 4 0 ,.. T1, !a\,_ 0 I . i/kiL'''''--Z ''_-0 1 iv i e .;4:0: 1 5.1•:1 . - -- 'GU '' • - ' " '- t• ' 1 ,.• - r( I 49 :t t 1--• '-' ,- i.-",,-;.19-.:17.j.,.`;'; .4,,M2H.,sfi!",. ,•• 7;-..-.... , L-----"--/-' ' 4: l::::i'-.•-j-."--;1- i..-.1.=--,7 i 9Q.. ''.5-, ..7'' 47' - lt,\`' 1 - • - 0 4 1-_:••••, - - :.•-_-__:_:, i._ •.,,,---L.,...-.-.-.•••/: •:,-);-:,..-,-,:•--. --.4- ' -.1110-4..•-•••• ID_ . _' NOTICE OF. PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC. HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON ,- WASHINGTON, ON OCTOBER 24 1978 , AT 9 :00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . FLORENCE McWILLIAMS , Files 228-78 and W-229-78 , APPLICATIONS FOR TWO-LOT SHORT PLAT AND WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS ; property located at North 26th Street and Meadow Avenue North . 2 . J . CLIFFORD GRAY ile R-255-78 PPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G-6000— o - ; property located at 224 S . E . 12th Street between Maple Avenue S . W. and Rainier Avenue South . 3 . LORETTA AND THELMER OLSON , Files 230-78 and E-231-78 , APPLICATIONS FOR TWO-LOT SHORT PLAT AND EXCEPTION FROM THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE , property located in the vicinity of 2146 Union Avenue N . E . Legal descriptions of files noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED 'PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON OCTOBER 24 , 1978 AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y. ERICKSEN PUBLISHED October 13 , 1978 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION L STE`VE' MUNSON HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE' ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, on the ,`,' day of O`rr v k , 19 7 SIGNED Alltewe 71144116060, 4 pF v o THE CITY OF RENTON u .icz z Z ,-ri u° ::`ars^' o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 980551,2o• 0 was k. CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 00 235-2550 41-FD SEPIt40 J . Clifford Gray 15437 S . E . 132nd Street Renton , Washington 98055 RE': NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G-6000 TO L-1 ; FIle No . R-255-78; property located at 224 S . E . 12th Street between Maple Avenue S .W. and Rainier Avenue South Dear Mr . Gray : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on September 20 , 1978 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for October 24 , 1978 at 9 : 00 a .m , Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550 . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . _ Ericksen Plannin Director 1J/ ; / // UBy . y //. tie 4,7 IYa.v i d R . C l e s Associate Planner cc.: Arnold Hardin 26236 - 173rd Avenue S . E . Kent , WA 98031 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : i 7/ ./ lUiem) ! IVt`l- 7c'y 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : iVi Re#- 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : V,,5 FPP.E. l e %,o N 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: 1 ii!.E- 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: i Q . 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: bji 4'e/ cJ/2—k2D j AJ /- tl% r B ,i52 Pi- AI / II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X TES— MAYBE NO b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? YET— MAYBE 0 d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? Yam- MAYBE Ir e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , Xeitheronoroffthesite? YES MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MAYBE /g- Explanation: oCITYOFRENTON, WASHINGTON F \\, Cr ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM PL(EII/Eb /\0'\ SEP 20 1978 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ' 1"l' G PAvk Application No. 7 Environmental Checklist No. ?iF 390- .79 PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: 0 Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance 0 Declaration of Non-Significance El Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The •Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers'you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: j=3-A/i iv WA ci9(0 A PHco= 365-6 -19/R 3. Date Checklist submitted Gj" ( S •- 6? 4. Agency requiring Checklist rfa--)/ Qf- 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: l6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : ti Exit"/JL/G7Ru•eiuRE A d - . ram• i TA I Lev<t, LC)A. rt a e r)/h -64 L- af-p/ i9p,464 Cl3c,i/ry FOR r.R/JI 1/)t6 H 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of • any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? YES FUR" fl0 b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE 0 c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YU— MAYBE 12 d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? l YTS— M YBE 'NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels?, YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? YES MAYBE Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? C YET' MATTE NO Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES M YBE NO Explanation: . 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in .the event of an accident or upset conditions? YES MAYBE N Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Yam— MAYBE Explanation: 3- 2) Air. Will .the proposal result in: ' a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? YES MAYBE b b) The creation of objectionable odors? 'V€S— MAYBE c) Alteration of air movement,, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? V VEs MAYBE' 14— Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in. currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? VET- BE 0 b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? ' TES— MAYBE c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YET— MAYBE d) Change in the amount ,of surface water in any water body? VAS MATTE 0 e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration ' surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YT MAYBE 0 f) Alteration of the direction•or rate of flow of ground waters? 1E - MAYBE 0 g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES 'MAYBE NO h)' ' Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents,- waterborne virus or bacteria, 4-or other substances into the ground waters? frES i) Reduction in the amount" of water otherwise available for public water supplies? 'Yt MAYBE Explanation: 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change' in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of, flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? 4.-. Y— MAYBE b), Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? N 0(v MAYBE c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a ba,rrierto the normal replenishment of existing species? VEV MAYBE d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural • crop? r- 11'HV ' Explanation: i 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES MAYBE N e) Storm water drainage? YES MAYBE f) Solid waste and disposal? YES MAYBE )0 Explanation: 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. \Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE N Explanation: 20) Archeologicalf Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? i MAYBE 0 Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: gned name printed City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 5.- , 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand. for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) .Generation of additional vehicular movement? C YES MAYBE No. b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? YES M—AITE ab c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YE MAYBE d) Alterations to. present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YET— RPM- O e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YET— MAYBE K5i . f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? VET— MAYBE NO Explanation: 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? YES MAYBE WO— b) Police protection? t YES MAYBE 4 Sc) Schools? YES MAYBE NO d); Parks or other recreational facilities? C YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? YES M NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YET— MAYBE al - Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? YES RATITE NO c) Water? YES MAYBE NO CITY OF RENTON OF R ‘ • R FIVEb REZONE APPLICATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SEP 20 197P LAND USE HEARING . 4 APPLICATION NO.EXAMINER 'S ACTION APPLICATION FEE $ /e),;.?, -- APPEAL FILED VAMINV RECEIPT NO. - -51,7/CITY COUNCIL ACTION FILING DATE 7S ORDINANCE NO. AND DATE HEARING DATE APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : a;;(- 6 e 9 cr-pc.E ' 1 . Name eL1FFc2flD 6R/47 Phone ,.ge 38 3f? Now- Address 5'437 5E 13,R RE____A/704/ Lb 4 98'05is 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on 5, ) J Z cI between whple_ and 07/1/N/ R, 4 . Square footage or acreage of property 40, 0e9c9 s4) f/ 5 . Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet) A.07-5 9 , 3e), 3/ Bi,ect< 1 06-roA1' pEAJ Div/sic/9u- I eou,o-ty 6 . Existing Zoning 16 -( 000 Zoning Requested -347- gOTE TO APPLICANT : The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiat c. your request may be attached to . this sheet. (See Applicatio Procedure Sheet for specific requirements . ) Submit this foriH in duplicate . 7. Proposed use of site nnu-Reint= OfFie-.E_ Amp ST7ORA--(4-E ff B. List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. c.)(7P4V 4 /9-4)/5 5-6wpm/a I , F,g/V 6_71/7- 9 . How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? in in EiDi O . Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept . 1-77 4 - F Re/i RECEIVED c) AFFIDAVIT EP 20 197P ki I . . DEpP/ Ale) being duly sworn;—d c are that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 26 day of 19 19 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at r Name of^ ot•a,ry Pub c) Signature of Owner) C % '` . , g6a3a — /73 Address) Address) RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON e5)11/ HEARING EXAMINER City) State) OCT 241978 AM PM zo8t91ro,110a1 1 a4 IBiri" N 3 — 1 ‘0- b eephorie ITEM NO. X aY. 7.F FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to . certify that the foregoing application has been inspected 'by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received 19 By: Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER OCT 2 41978 PLANNING DEPARTMENT AM PM PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER 71819110111112111213141516 PUBLIC HEARING A OCTOBER 24, 1978 APPLICANT: J . CLIFFORD GRAY EXHIBIT NO. / FILE NUMBER: R-225-78 ITEM NO. 6- gP-5 -- -1 A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a rezoning of 10,000 square feet located at the northeast corner of Maple Avenue S . W. and S . W. 12th Street from G-6000 to L-1 Light Industrial for a future office with storage in an existing structure. B . GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : ARNOLD HARDIN 2 . Applicant: J . CLIFFORD GRAY 3. Location : Northeast corner of Maple Avenue S. W. and S . W. 12th Street. 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5. Size of Property : 10, 000 square feet. 6 .' Access :Maple Avenue S . W. from Grady Way. 7 . Existing Zoning : G-6000 Single Family 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : G-6000 Single Family; B-1 , Business and L-1 , Light Industrial . 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Manufacturing Park. 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was property published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . C . PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Applicant proposes to rezone this 10,000 square foot area to provide for future use of an existing structure for commercial office with storage. D . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed by Ordinance No . 1745 of April 4 , 1959 , as amended by Ordinance No . 1764 of May 27 , 1959 , and Ordinance No . 1928 of December 22 , 1961 . The current G-6000 zoning has existed since annexation. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : J . CLIFFORD GRAY , FILE NO : R-225-78 OCTOBER 24, 1978 PAGE TWO E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography: The subject site is essentially a level , developed residential lot. 2. Soils : Ur-Urban Land is soil that has been modified by disturbance of the natural layers with the addition of fill up to several feet thick to accommodate industry or housing . 3 . Vegatation: The site is a mixture of manicured residential vegatation and undergrowth of natural grasses . A hedge of trees and shrubs separates the subject site from the residence to the east. Two mature cottonwoods and a douglas fir are located adjacent to the right-of-way of Maple Avenue. 4. Wildlife: Due to the developed nature of the site and immediate parcels , any wildlife is expected to be those species adaptable to the semi -urban conditions . 5 . Water: None. 6 . Land Use : The site is equidistant between Grady Way and Interstate 405 . Adjoining parcels on the east and west - are developed single family residences . An existing two story duplex is across S . E . 12th . F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The neighborhood is a mixture of residential and business uses along with interspersed vacant lots . Some transition of uses from a former residential character to business uses is in evidence with concentrations of non-residential uses primarily along Grady Way. G . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer: A 12" water line is existing in Maple Avenue. A 10" water line must be extended from Lind Avenue easterly to this site via the alley separating lots on Grady from 12th. 2. Fire Protection : To be provided by the City of Renton Fire Department in accordance with ordinance requirements . 3. Transit: Metro Transit Route 145 operates on Grady Way and Route No. 150 operates on Rainier Avenue and S. R . 167 . 4. . Schools': Talbot Hill Elementary is located approximately 1 1 /2 miles southeast, with Fred Nelson Junior High another 3/4 miles east. Renton Senior High School is located approximately 3/4 miles .to the northeast. 5. Parks : ' Talbot Hill Park is located 1 1/2 miles to the southeast. H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-729 "G" General Classification District. 2. ' Section 4-712 Lil , Light Industrial District. 3 . Section ;4-730, M-P , Manufacturing Park District . 4. Section 4-718 , Parking and Loading Regulations . I . APPLICABLE SIIECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1 . Land Use Report, 1965 , Page 11 , Industrial ; Page 17 , Objectives . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : J . CLIFFORD GRAY , FILE NO : R-225-78 OCTOBER 24 , 1978 PAGE THREE 2 . Policy Statement , 1965, Page 7 , Industrial Development. 3 . Streets and Arterials , 1965 , Page 2 , Purposes and objectives . 4. Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan . J . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL SYSTEMS : Minimal as the site is currently developed . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS : Encroachment of business and industrial uses into the subject neighborhood will eventually displace the existing residential uses . Existing social ties and interactions will be lost at that time. The proposed rezoning will contribute to this impact. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHO,LD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a declaration of environmental non-significance has been prepared for the subject rezoning on the basis that the site is essentially developed , with parking remaining as a future improvement. M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : A vicinity map and a site area map are attached . N . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of ; Renton Building Division. 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division. 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4. City of Renton Utilities Division. 5. City of „ Renton Fire Department. 0. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The proposed rezoning is from G-6000 to L-1 Light Industrial is not precisely in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation of Manufacturing Park. Due' to the existing platted condition of the subject neighborhood , the City has previously approved a number of rezonings in this area to L-1 Light Industrial subject to restrictive .covenants to provide compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan . These rezonings include Ordinances 2425 August 1968) ; 2559 (April 1970 ) ; 2590 (October 1970) ; 2594 (October 1970) ; and 3053 (August 1976 ) . The covenants attached to those previous rezoning applications generally contained the following requirements : a . No structure within 20-feet of any property line; b . 10-foot landscape setback along all exterior property lines ; c . Any ;exterior storage to be screened by a solid fence ; 2 . The subject site contains an existing two story single family residence containing approximately 2 ,000 square feet of floor area . Adjoining uses on all sides are existing , occupied residential structures . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: J . CLIFFORD GRAY , FILE NO : R-225-78 OCTOBER 24,1 1978 PAGE FOUR 3. The Comprehensive Plan suggests a number of objectives page 17' - Land Use Report) for protecting residential uses through the effective control of land use, " and to "prevent blight by protecting residential and other exclusive districts from the unwarranted infiltration of uncompatible uses which would contribute to premature decay and obsolecence . " "Residential districts should be free from manufacturing or commercial uses which would be detrimental to the community. " 4. The slubject neighborhood area, is in a state of transition from residential to business/industrial uses . Non- residenti;al uses can be noted both east and west of the subject site along Grady Way. 5. Interstate 405 Freeway, Rainier Avenue South and Grady Way surround the subject site with considerable traffic and intrusive noise levels at peak hours of the day. 6 . The Comprehensive Plan (Land' Use Report, page 11 ) speaks to the following characteristics of industrial uses . " Basic industry---may include both large and small enterprises employing a few or many persons . " "The availability and access to major transportation systems---is important. " "Unless well planned for, certain detrimental influences such as excessive heavy traffic , high sound levels ,---etc . may produce blight in surrounding areas . " 7 . The following specific objectives are outlined in the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan : a . "Minimize detrimental effects " ; "Promote esthetics--- so developed areas will not be detrimental to adjacent development" ; "Promote high quality development. " b. "Light industrial , office and warehouse uses that can be compatible with (the) goals of the Valley" ; "Land uses should be grouped to promote a harmonious mix. " c. A landscape buffer should be established at the periphery of bounding streets--- (and ) between areas of incompatible land use ; " "Development should occur in a logical , systematic manner--- . " 8 . It is difficult to determine the level of incompatibility of any future use of this property with adjoining , existing residential uses . Any adverse effects of said future use should be mitigated as recommended by the Comprehensive Plan. P . RECOMMENDATION : Approve the subject rezone from G-6000 to L-1 Light Industrail subject to the following restrictive covenants to run with the land : 1 . Prior ta occupancyof the subject building by a commercial or industrial use , a site plan approval by the Hearing Examiner shall be, granted including location of parking and detailed landscaping plans . 2 . No new structures shall be located within 20 feet of any property , line. 3 . A 10-foot landscape setback shall be provided along all property 'ilines , with the exception that the landscaped area along the eastlproperty line may be expanded at the time of site plan approval to mitigate any specific adverse effects of this development on the adjoining single family residence. 4. No exterior storage shall be allowed east of the existing structure' and shall be screened with a solid fence 6 to 10 feet high. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : J . CLIFFORD GRAY , FILE NO : R-225-78OCTOBER24 , 1978 PAGE FIVE In addition to the Planning Department recommendations , those recommendations of the Fire Department , Engineering and Utility Divisionshouldbeincluded . 2. Ile b... t t • 4. pONN ,...,-,,,- ' k.A 1 s--•71 4 ia 91 4 N . Aci . 1 1 1)111,,,„.--7e --• - A' e 4 SO ,i .s J.:•k -4,• lAirbp Oil r. - 9 iiIi ‘ 4 I :;.:1- -,',... CoOtialle t. . 100r0/00r.illr' VII .. -;I 461 461(41 !..,41t..'' . RIT /UI 11'..,......,,.0111 17,,. 1 9 s`.4, 43 . V ditl, , • 0 'f- I41F., ,-!- 14,46/1- t.T 1 _ • I/ / icreeruerh iriall'1012 1 I 4, AIX 41104W WIL I/i".„a-t• 0/ r. r/ /ii, ..:1.'.11:717:71" 46 31 4t- a. 1 „.,.. 1.., X:'''• ',. .: 1 14 /slowt.,..,4.,„ r A.„,? ., 1 ,-•.-... : 01. lb 1 1 f = s, 1 .V.711 e.: 4 : pg ;-•••••e• i 4. .., -••• I'.''''t '; f' 4.?rz.i.T III S• - •.. ib i z5 t * ft 41 Pe ' r ." 0 ",c..'. 4.pa; . 1 - 1-• A ,,,,i , .F,.. 6.1 •- 04 .• •6 - r-st stir334i••• i i 7 I 11 In' I • > .-" ..'";''''''''''' 1, t\ eI. 4 14 91" I yr 1 .-•=!5* ; J •-"11. i.„ .. ci 2 --- sr t•......; ! —. t . c,t) V jA,59 I Is 0 16 I . --.. 15 1.‘ 1 4 3 i oi r I I i. - . ,..... ,•••i T '' 1 i5-4 55.3 a a ,-: , st:11l'i 141 . .. I.0 ,r . •-•t•1 ii 1c : 1 3 5 Z _..J 5,2.• __144.6 .4 Jr._ 1. ... ,....t, •S 14- V. it 111 ' 1111.. no b 11. • _ ______1 s\./ 4.,...... 4• 74 . '':' 1. . ' Le' . 47 i '••'4,.. •• 1''. t •-. 1,•••••.t.' I. • . : 40vit -------- vniocrioN e-ti*".:6bemr406to / I : Aitisa ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : Q Finance Department Fire Department Library Department OPark Department Police Department Pub11.5 Works Department /065/e-'-f- -77eJ 00 Building Div. Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description) 4) Traffic Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div. FROM : Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee)C ( i"l' DATE : i7 //A PLEASE REVIEW THISS APPLICATION FOR : REZONE r''0,'lb MAJOR PLAT SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4 lye ,av5WITHANYCOMMENTSYOUMIGHTHAVE , BEFORE I'/ REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEP_A,RT ENTS : J Department : L DK, Ems. Approved L_._.J Not Approved Comments or conditions : 7 (-;) 7-11 (7 ' y Signature of Dix•ec(or or Authorized Representative Date i" REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : -f/, 2T Approved Not Approved Comments or conditions : _ S 7- /`lG 1- S- Q. / /ice G /"GOCc/ Ge-/ii"! /# C cif9•LJj c/Z l( IO /Jfir' AL i4 C Ci,4"- Lxi/-/ //S//C-AT s ` 6 a-76"./7 -f7 T. i . /.'c iiic?(/61,-iS Or G/, ' 7 (: 6V <i/%I, 7 //-; Gi/'ll Signature of Director or Authorized Representative ate REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Approved Not Apprr ved Comments or conditions : 5 07LO(—e-40/... L'..)/ f•-.0 , ,•,. ..: •i , i, f) r1:)/e,,,I••!„.,, L.44:. ..,. ; •-i,:_. I' kl% CV 6.7 yr t.7 ,.::!,.71.; y-C, 1„,.. K• (r C rf(ni(12 /e 4 v r 52 ..:.-.; ,:;,• .i /...e .11, s--/- • I.': Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 1A---1- Npprover r=1Not Approved Comments or conditions : Ict.,/,•-_7' -;r:•,,,... ..••=. 1 ,, ,,,,,.....p L 4-1;•! r,,,,iv-- 4-3)-1 u.-1 Alic." '" -`1,•\CL-•• • 7)et r •rN- ','• 1-.-Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Approved I:=1 Not Approved oJ Comments Or conditions : CeH. ' :----. 7C. <,-----6, - , , -(- 7--,---1- -- -----) o •-) 2 '..)" Signature of Director or Authorized Represe7ative Date / REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : r== Approved CINot Approved Comments or conditions : Signature of Director. or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department P0ice Department Public Works Department 01 Building Div. 0 Engineering Div. 0 Traffic Engineering Div. 10 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his designee) 1U2 (21 61,6tigiv4 qitillt SUBJECT : Review of ECF- I2-4 Application No . : 0"Ze --lb Action Name : at b L ti p5Z01i Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) : of oweillj Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW .BY OTHER CI,ITY DEPARTMENTS : De artment : -_ JDL-1-) L-, A roved 0 Not ApprovedLomments : r', 7 n y 9i 1/ .di Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 4/''' . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : CommenAts':roved 0 Not Approved is? / 1'1 / 1 5.. ri, -" c2CL. e,. i/ er of /.///Jie/g/z--js rS _'cu/2 D/2i/// le I/ems' 2"X l//,-- ite J/ J_ /CCfe; S / 1 / Z G'//c / '.--2 J a/ r.c Gt 2.2 4,--- 67,..--/----0—:77,1-2--., ,,-,-• - 9/2 c/. /717 Signature of Director or Aut orized Representative Date 1 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 1) ir" !-f Z1 Approved Li Not AppriovedComments : ra 76 1)7 2,'^Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : D.qpartment : 7(7/ 7/I.:r›cr Approved Li Not ApprovedComments : 17c3 ,.„ 5r21:f1 C • TSSignatureofDirectororAuthorizedRepresentativeDae REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Lu Approved 0 Not ApprovedCommentg : ignature of Director or Authoriied Representative Date EVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : LI Approved Not Approved Comments : , gnature of Director or Authorized Representative Date PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NON=SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-225-78 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . 390-78 O FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Rezoning of 10 ,000 square feet from G-6000 to L- 1 Light Industrial Proponent J . CLIFFORD GRAY Location of Proposal Northeast corner of S . W. 12th and Maple Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS ® is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma a after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file. with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental^osngnificance : The proposal is for rezoning only. Further environmental analysis will be required prior to improvements to the property or use of the existing structure for L- 1 uses . Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon. Y . Ericksen Title Pla ; ' n1Dir- , to Date AlOW. Signature rat t Pr Kr- City of Renton i Planning Department 5-76 1/ a 4 R-225-78 Page Two zoning due to possible increase in noise and odor emitted by industrial use, and advised that due to the existing condition of the streets an increase in traffic would be detrimental. Mrs. Tonelli indicated that she had not received prior notice of the public hearing and requested additional time in which to study the proposal. Responding was: Mrs. Arthur Ballestrasse 201 S.W. 12th Street Renton, WA 98055 Mrs. Ballestrasse indicated that she owns seven single family residences east of the subject property as well as being half-owner of the property located directly east of the proposed rezone, and reported her objection to L-1 zoning. Responding was: Roy Ballestrasse 260 S.W. 12th Street Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Ballestrasse, owner of a single family residence to the east of the subject site, objected to the proposed rezone and noted that the subject site contains 9500 square feet, not 10,000 square feet as denoted in Exhibit #1. He indicated that property to the north and east of the site is currently zoned B-1 and felt that L-1 zoning was incompatible with existing uses in the area. The Examiner requested comments from Mr. Clemens. Mr. Clemens noted that B-1 rather than L-1 zoning category may be less detrimental to the existing residential properties in the area and asked the applicant if he would be amenable to the revision in zoning designation. Mr. Gray requested clarification of requirements of the B-1 zone regarding setbacks, landscaping and parking. Mr. Clemens reported that requirements would be similar but less restrictive in the B-1 zoning category. Mr. Gray indicated his concurrence with the revised designation. Responding to concerns previously discussed, Mr. Gray indicated that the proposed 'office and storage use of the property for a business form distributorship would not require extension of sewers and would not require additional parking space since all sales of the product occur in the establishments of customers. Mrs. Tonelli questioned certain impacts regarding parking, traffic and sewers, and inquired if similar restrictions would be placed upon a subsequent owner if the property were sold in the future. The Examiner advised that the buyer would be eligible for any uses allowed in the zoning category as long as zoning requirements were met. Mrs. Tonelli questioned provisions for parking, and noted limited footage on the lot as well as limited parking capabilities of existing streets. The Examiner explained that parking calculations would be predicated upon the uses contained in the building and would be determined by the Planning Department following rezone of the property, although parking would not be allowed within areas designated as setbacks. He noted that if the rezone were approved subject to site approval, a subsequent public hearing would be conducted to review the specific site plan which would encompass parking provisions, landscaping and setback requirements. Mrs. Tonelli indicated her opposition to L-1 zoning and inquired if that designation could be excluded by the Examiner at the public hearing. The Examiner indicated that a decision regarding zoning designation would be made during review following closure of the public hearing. He also explained that the King County Health Department would determine capabilities of the existing septic tank on the property and recommend sewer extension if requirements were not met. Mrs. Tonelli requested additional time to allow opportunity to further review the impact from a rezone to L-1, but indicated that rezone to B-1 would not require an extension of review period. The Examiner requested further comments. Responding was: Arnold Hardin 224 S.W. 12th Street Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Hardin, owner of the subject property, reported that the previous owner had utilized the structure as a cabinet shop, and upon purchase of the property, Mr. Hardin had been informed that B-1 zoning existed on the site. He advised that he has been operating a business similar in nature to that proposed by Mr. Gray and no difficulties had resulted from excessive traffic, inadequate parking provisions, or septic tank failure, noting that volume of use of septic tanks is greater from residential than office use. The Examiner questioned the date of purchase of the property. Mr. Hardin indicated, that the property had been purchased in 1975 and had been utilized for his business, Circo, October 26, 1978 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: J. Clifford Gray FILE NO. R-225-78 LOCATION: Northeast corner of Maple Avenue S.W. and S.W. 12th Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests approval of a rezone of 10,000 square feet located at the northeast corner of Maple Avenue S.W. and S.W. 12th Street from G-6000. to L-1, Light Industrial, for a future office with storage in an existing structure. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Recommend approval with restrictive RECOMMENDATION: covenants. Hearing Examiner: Recommend approval to B-1 with . restrictive covenants. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on October 17, 1978. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on October 24, 1978 at 9:30 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed -by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. David Clemens, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibit into the record: Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was: Clifford Gray 15437 S.E. 132nd Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Gray indicated his concurrence with the exception of the 20-foot setback required on the northern property line abutting the alleyway denoted in Recommendation No. P.2 of Exhibit #1, and requested that the setback be reduced to 10 feet. The Examiner noted that the applicant is not listed as the property owner on the affidavit of ownership contained in the rezone file and requested clarification. Mr. Gray indicated that he is proposing to purchase the property contingent upon rezone approval and other matters. The affidavit of ownership was entered into the record as Exhibit #2 by the Examiner. The Examiner requested .further testimony in support of the application. There was no response. He then requested Mr. Clemens to respond to the applicant's request for reduction in setback designation on the northern property line. Mr. Clemens indicated that the proposal was acceptable in view of the 16-foot width of the alley and the required 10-foot landscaping strip along that property line. The Examiner requested testimony in opposition to the request. Responding was: Mrs. August Tonelli 22234 •84th Avenue S. • Kent, WA 98031 Mrs. Tonelli advised that she is half-owner .of the'property to_ the east,. and,owner of the residence located across S.W. 12th Street to the south of the subject site. Due to the minimum size of lots in the surrounding area, she felt that.. an: increase in use of the subject property would infringe on existing residents in the. area and possibly create a need for sewers to which she objects. She also objected to proposed L-1 R-225-78 Page Four 9. Office use is proposed on the upper floor and storage in the lower floor of the existing residence. B-1 zoning as recommended by staff appeared acceptable for this use to all parties. CONCLUSIONS: 1. It is very apparent that the area immediately surrounding the subject property is in transition from single family residential land use to a more intense land use. Less evident is whether the direction is to commercial or industrial. Commercial B-1) uses abut the northerly portion of the site and extend along S.W. Grady Way, but do not exhibit a strong trend to commercial land use in the area. Single family residential land use remains the dominant land use in the area surrounding the property. Westerly of the property exists relatively large areas of L-1 and B-1 property separated by G-6000 property. However, the zoning pattern of the entire area south of Grady Way, north of FAI-405 and west of SR-167 provides sufficient guidance that the direction that zoning is taking is at least to a mixture of B-1 and L-1. Gradually the existing and transitional single family uses are being, replaced predominantly by commercial or industrial uses. 2. Although the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is merely a general guide to implementation of the Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance No. 2142, Section 1.II.1) , the designation of Manufacturing Park (M-P) at least indicates the reclassification trend to more intense uses than single family. Due to the small, narrow property configurations of the area, zoning of M-P presents difficulty of compliance with setback, etc. requirements of the M-P zone which is actually intended for large parcels and development. 3. The Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives seem to predominantly support reclassification of the property to B-1 (Section 4-3014. (B) ) . Access is available within a close proximity to FAI-405 and SR-167 (page 11, Commercial, Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report, July, 1965) . This will not produce or contribute to premature decay of the neighborhood but will contribute to orderly growth Objective No. 1, page 17, Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report, July, 1965) . This is effective control of the land use in the area (page 17, Objective No. 4, Ibid) . This use will promote the best interests of the community (page 18, Objective No. 6, Ibid) . B-1 would be a more compatible use to existing single family residences page 5, Objectives, Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, June, 1976) . Zoning of the intensity oflL-1 and M-P in this triangle area appears to present difficult development problems for the small ownership and lot configuration that dominates the area. In some locations rezones to L-1 have recently been approved which imposed special conditions making the zoning more similar to the M-P zone (O'Brien, R-885-76, Divelbiss, R-016-77, and Dalpay, R-143-78) . The circumstances surrounding these rezones appears dissimilar from the subject application. The subject property at this time relates to the abutting B-1 and G-6000 zones and must form some transition between the two zones. 4. Transition, buffering or an additional building setback does not appear necessary between the northerly abutting B-1 zone and the subject recommended B-l. However, this is not the case with the less intense G-6000 zone abutting the other portions of the property. Between the abutting easterly G-6000 property a 20-foot landscaped screening area for transition and buffering purposes should be maintained between these markedly different intense zoning categories. This landscaped area should be used for landscaping screening only and be free of structures, pavement or parking. Since the southerly and westerly portions of the property abut streets, not single family development, a lesser landscape screening and buffer area of 10 feet appears appropriate. As specified in the aforementioned condition, this landscaped area should be for landscaping only. In addition, the building setbacks along the. streets should be 20 feet to conform to adjacent single family development, unless adjacent properties are reclassified to a zoning category of similar intensity or more intense than B-1. If such reclassification occurs, the normal setbacks of the B-1 zone should. apply. 5. Due to the proximity to single family development, it is appropriate that the Planning Department review and approve exterior waste container enclosures. Such containers should be enclosed by a fence that sufficiently screens the containers from view from the single family properties. Other exterior storage should not occur, but all materials should be stored within the building. R-225-78 Page Three Inc. The Examiner advised that a non-conforming use in a zoning designation may continue, even if the property is sold, until termination Of that use, at which .time the property in question would be required .to conform to existing zoning regulations. Mr. Ballestrasse reported that the previous owner of the property resided on the property, was employed at Pacific Car & Foundry Co. , and although he may have built cabinets within the residence, it was not a business and he did not possess a license for that purpose. The Examiner inquired if the existing residence had been located precisely on the map in order to establish accurate setback areas in an ,L-1 zone. Mr'. Clemens reviewed setbacks and parking areas denoted in Section P. lR'ecommendation of Exhibit. #1, and reported' that the proposed parking plan was acceptable' and substantial area remained for more intensive ' development if required in the future. He indicated that although the applicant proposed only six parking spaces in accordance with office space proposed within the ,structure, the site would allow expansion to 10 parking spaces if the entire building were utilized for office purposes. He clarified that the lot actually contained 9500 square feet as previously reported by Mr. Ballestrasse, but the figure ,had been rounded to 10,000 for the purpose of the.staff analysis. The Examiner requested a final recommendation from the Planning Department. Mr. Clemens reviewed requirements contained'in the Green River Comprehensive Plan document and the Land Use Map document of the Comprehensive Plan which designates the area north of Grady Way for commercial use and _the property south of Grady Way for manufacturing park use. He advised that to maintain conformance with the existing plans for the area, but taking into consideration concerns of the adjacent residents, a revised recommendation to - B-1 category was acceptable with retention of restrictive covenants to minimize detrimental effects of building Or parking arrangements, as well as the previously reported revision of reduction to a 10-foot setback on the northern boundary of the property abutting the existing alley. The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No. R-225-78 was closed by the Examiner at• 10:15 a.m. FINDINGS; CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is .f or' reclassifying 9500 square feet of property from G-6000 to L-1. During the public hearing, staff revised its recommendation to B-1 with conditions, . which. was acceptable to the applicant. 2. . The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues; applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact,. and departmental recommendations in this matter, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set 'forth in full therein. 3. Pursuant to the City of .Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971; aaamended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. If required, a sewer line must be extended to the property (Exhibit #1) . 6. The proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, lot'coverage 'andheight requirements of Section 4-712 ' (L-1) and 4-711 (B-1) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances. Sufficient area for parking exists on the site while meeting the conditions recommended by staff. Depending upon the amount of area used in the existing house six to 10 parking spaces may be required. 7. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. indicates the property to potentially be Manufacturing Park (Section 4-3014. (B)) . 8. Northwesterly and northerly of. the site, exist commercial uses in B-1 zoning. Within several lots westerly,' southerly and easterly of the' property. exist only residential land uses. The subject property currently used as a business essentially in the same manner as proposed. Testimony appeared. to:indicate that the, current ' business use began in 1975. Prior to that time the property was used as a single family residence wherein a hobby of some woodworking occurred. k , R-225-78 Page Five 6. Review by the Examiner of the site plan seems unnecessary as long as the existing building or any alterations or expansion thereof conforms to the conditions imposed upon the reclassification. Section 4-711.0 (B-1) imposes a height limit of 35 feet (same as single family) , except as otherwise approved by the Examiner for this property. 7. It is assumed that any development or use of the property shall conform to other applicable city ordinances and regulations. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the record, testimony, findings and conclusions, it is the Examiner's recommendation that the City Council approve a reclassification of the property to B-1 subject to the following conditions being implemented in restrictive covenants: 1. A 20-foot landscape buffer along the easterly property line exclusively for screening purposes per review and approval of the Planning Department. 2. A 10-foot landscape buffer along the southerly and westerly property lines exclusively for screening purposes per review and approval of the Planning Department. 3. A 20-foot building setback along the southerly, westerly and easterly property lines; except that normal building setback restrictions of 'the B-1 zone will be applied if zoning abutting or adjacent to these property lines is changed to a use of at least the intensity of B-1. 4. Exterior waste containers shall be screened from view by single family residences per review and approval of the Planning Department. 5. Exterior storage of materials shall not occur. ORDERED THIS 26th day of October, 1978. 2 ilhatiga V7 L. Rice B-eler Land Use Hearing Examiner . TRANSMITTED THIS 26th day of October, 1978 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: J. Clifford Gray, 15437 S.E. 132nd St. , Renton, WA 98055 Mrs. August Tonelli, 22234 84th Ave. S. , Kent, WA 98031 Mrs. Arthur Ballestrasse, 201 S.W. 12th St. , Renton, WA 98055 Roy Ballestrasse, 260 S.W. 12th St. , Renton, WA 98055 Arnold Hardin, 224 S.W. 12th St. , Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 26th day of October, 1978 to the following:• • Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Councilwoman Patricia Seymour-Thorpe Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before November 9, 1978. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors. relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00. and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said office. i-, 1 i f Air:,,,-- I, Vb•- 164 a. „ • . ERPG* rill I 4 iii. 41 , k .i , f ......, N Ir„ ___......,..-- 1 win.* r 15 t 1' 117111\0 4 1 -C00404 i Id '.." • 4171" ; 1 ' - ' Il A 1 43 * 9,641' 61' ,wiel11011112111111111.11111.11 fili1i4 • i 4- ' pr 1 11111410 ti.-,::-. .i.' 111.17a5 1- • / 116. lb .51 Ir r: '''" i l‘..lg. elbr . rrc 06(tah icorfirw 35 Aix 411J4W FM1LV14i uktV/7 oltrtk114t IJCIIP N 0 1111 11111' 22:2-1 if... a PP'71-mg 41( b u) • ri• I eti. PO14 e 1 MX 1 i I i 4C. All/ Pf° I v1 . v. 53.r3:1111:1 iriii)11 : :,44:4.:; ....: . . e.• I ......> •.4( Alli •pg i 1 , e, . li. P- ti • , I, k - 1114 1). - 4.1) Ms 4 9 61 ' I a- -'• , f) I,1 i• iSkil lile r ; , ; . •1 ., O.• 1.3 L.- . i t 111 1 I 4 3 i9 ZSs/ F9 Ar .... GO Nt1 W 9 14- ' ;. 3 I + eft 1...,_ j• --•"I, Fir\ . • _...t:r.. 0 eripre4. 1 01' )..: 5 - 1 Z e...!PIE• . _7444 •-• er_ N c* N elb P / iis . __.-..i•J I . 4 . 4r. • a 0. r, i ; HI '.. I 0 Y je- - 47 i ''. 19 ;,1 V‘ • . -. .'''171 il lit it.... •...-................ •ta. - 0 i., i t • LS Aill1%, t L 170 E-IP-25 • iFAI VII 4110 44,eco /V frl : dr.a.gi l.----.-`. • 0,,,,,, '-• S ...:',.: <.,,, j' rrizr. -.......v...,.,..' .. i.,. R . .3._..-• ,".',; 4.;-I1s:-Vz:/- e;.... F7,,.4,4Y.., r.,.,../.. 4„.....,..l..i..•.,..,!'• B,=, r,. i.;,:,,.;•,•,:,- D.".,,,.' 1-.. w_-,....,-„„•.,./... a. r': gri„.......;,." i...; 1.- s,,.,. l. 2.,, f. . m t-,;.r as,,•:.....474,.. C.,-,N-,- 0„ N 09,_I,P 4.. ii.•4.44,0_. . 1„, 4-1 ,frr,..-4:..z7...7,,,,..•=fit_r:.,,i--4,-.' t. r ,..,4,...6,,„. ..7,•./sr y.,. ......"VIZ. t..-fi...41$C.1.711, Vt\4 4 eiZC . ' 4.I'I Pr'1,1 '' 1 t.:::43i',.1,44 I ' •. ....... ...... , -. r.""..1..-L.4-. 1 AAIr._,, ,,,, t-_-::____— r__ S nd 1 r7___;___ ==__.__.-....-:- 1 . B din II S. --7' 111, I 1 7 . 9, 727\N I:57\ ,, , • ‘,. , I i 0000000/-. fais''-- I l' I I f- -----;-- '' L‘l• IN—„nage I I 1 I 7Z-.,------ ... . -!..---",` ----- v ---- onoillowl" ir;.i. -.1 s , r R isLAC1F' i:',4-.-;1•Al..' I •Ill°St inniiiiiirtOifill I" I!' Z cz/.keRt4- 1"-- • r' ' 0000 1 I' ; Mil • • 00.1114 VA N 1\ . i 6....NIS)" 'St k..r-f-3r-'--, . " .,. .I' 1- .--' 4' OIS,r._-' .-- ," 4 . R-3_1 „.i--: • .,..rr!---c-,4:-•.!5.----:-,- . - L pk. P. 04to bri . .1- • .9- p i AWS 4. i$11.1):p. ,_ 1' '',-----„,, ir : _-..-g, . i.•,. • • li ..1, . -',7"4,`"' '7' ' ', - ii1;---"'-";•• 1.____--• ;,..... - Ir."°.-.7 1-000 ' . If..1.11.44.,ii . ' Ir.' .. ,, , t.....- 0 '.---``'510110'/( 1;4 1.11111" Tf',1-7-' c ligii•Iq ' .'''e 4" .. k i . '--r, •:-..-,71.ft.•!iff.L.ii-7,47.-Tc-:-;,=-,--7----- -77---• •-- . •----N • ,-• ii 4, e is, u . - ...„. ••••-•-i‘ I---,,,, . •,......,--` _ ,._.„::-1, -N.., . • • fir- •',. 1•\ j/4 ,. .›-- ..„------ ------:- - -- .....- .-I, -,.--, : ',-..--.-- _- • •ty -.:_-:!_: _ .. ... 7- L., j _______.,;• L...04 • • LAir =fa in-,-. :. . . v ..:-. 7 a R-4 El-1 ' Li...L.-, . ..•,,,,, ", ,' i: - -.:-7. 4..1-:- • i. ' 7:;•-7-. .- 1.., :._ Am. t EZ: mp: . G-• 6Q00 • •-• • • , 7 - - ' ' t.e ; • • tt..! .. 1.-W 2•,,..:.-7 ..... _.._., d,....,.... .. . . .. G • 1 , .., ...._,._. .. 1... _,... _ . . .,,..„ ...i. ..: ....1 •-....:._. _Gw600. 7, •-,, •' • 1:: '•'. 4,1. - • : . i __ ..4, . . . : , ...•_.. ._._._; .,. :._.;..._•_-, :,..-..-..-•, 1 ,., _., ..v .., 10 •• .: •• .- u V. -A 3 .C. .. rtri .11— 1V__, '.. D• , z 1 i- -.:4 i • •res4 • ;,---.. -x.__:: 1'-•- :-- ; • -• ci -•-:• Po a., CY 0 • .. . : ' ' -- . - .- .. : V4;- : . -.::5—-. .:.:. I I . i , .,1 • .. , . 1 1 y: .• .4.- - ,- lk.-._;/P . I k11-- j-..nt-IS-,_,_••• ..c..,,,....,.. --", A3-4,-, 71 :--.I I 1- i I 40- .1 1 • .. J . CLIFFORD GRAY :, File NO . R7225-7 , APPLICATION' FOR REZONE FROM G-600.0 to L*1 ; property locateciat 224 S . E . • . 12th Street between Maple Avenue S . W. and Rainier ' Ayenue SoUth . . APPLICANT J . CLIFFORD GRAY TOTAL AREA 10 ,000 Sq . feet Maple Avenue S . W. from Grady WayPRINCIPALACCESS J . • G-6000 General Classification EMS) ING ZONING' Two-story EXISTING USE Single Family residence PROPOSED. USE Offices with accessory storage ParkCOMPREHENSIVELANDUSEPLANManufacturing COMMENTS 1••• .-... AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: ' That on the 26th day of October 19 78 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled Application' or petition. Subscribed and sworn this Alo - day of Cop 19 -('b Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at R.er.ton, Application, Petition or Case: J. Clifford Gray; R-225-78 The mi.n.wte4 contain a £Lst 06 .the panti.e6 o6 necond) OF R, 4 I. , THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 op CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR ® LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER Ap L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 4rf0 SEPZE O November 2, 1978 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. R-225-78; J. Clifford Gray Request for Rezone. Dear Council Members: Attached is the Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the referenced rezone request, dated October 26, 1978. The appeal period for the application expires on.November 9, 1978, and the report is being forwarded to you for review by the Planning and Development Committee following the, seven-day period from the date of publication. The complete file will be transmitted to the City Clerk on November 13, 1978, and will be placed on the Council agenda on November 20, 1978. If you require .additional assistance or information regarding this matter, please contact the undersigned. Sin - - i 040111111111,dr: L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner Attachment cc: Planning Department City Clerk yE7 4911, vJ t ryvv 00/X0E 1'1 -7/ ty tri,ey) r-J-P 2 T ryft9 i-r-7nt /70Y a r-frrerr 2„74,-, Tr ri:Y. 17-zre-g-714 V s I r 4-Y-74144 .17/40-7-710-7408 A-wvt --r- r7r/W f ey j",2')°,1%' ce r- 77 x- -°X ir l .- ay b S — s 9t4q`',." Nod,d-7747-714(. l®Qal\0. T Y 2, ' o 8 L f/ 1-2"?.."74 Y-?-77-rw 4,?,4-?~7/V c ay j77 L o x a -0 3 - 1l p Yam/ -// -0/ -6 -J 47A- 7yp 7-47/ 7-47-47y 044 lY2?-1V Cre-79 14 -11/4-)1 Z Tr'7ktl te ryi 1 y I ehy- Eye'/•-?- 47-1-6- Tx r/ r V 0 a OF R v o THE CITY OF RENTON Q MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 913055 z o o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER O 41- L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 OfD SEP1tt November 7, 1978 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. R-225-78; J. Clifford Gray Rezone Request. Dear Council Members: A request for reconsideration of the referenced rezone application was. received by the Examiner on November 6, 1978 within the appeal period • established for the request. Attached is the reconsideration request as well as the Examiner's subsequent response, dated November 7, 1978. This is to advise that a new appeal period has been established for the application which will expire on November 21, 1978, and the matter will be placed on the Council agenda on November 27, 1978 if further requests for reconsideration or appeal are not received. Since el L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: City Clerk Planning Department Parties of Record 0 THE CITY OF RENTON CI CD MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o op CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER p Si- L. RICK REELER . 235-2593 4lEDSEPSOt November 7, 1978. Mrs. C. A. Staley P.O. Box 3407 Federal Way, Washington 98003 RE: File No. R-225-78; J. Clifford Gray Request for Rezone. Dear Mrs. Staley: Your request of November 6, 1978 for reconsideration of the recommendation on this matter contained several objections while expressing agreement with the recommended B-1 zoning. These objections do not constitute sufficient justification to reconsider the matter, but can be answered from the record. Therefore, the following is provided to clarify the recommendation. The fact that Mr. Gray is the prospective purchaser, subject to rezoning, of the property is clearly stated on page one of the recommendation. Mr. Hardin is the property owner (Exhibit #2) and testified in the public hearing (page two) . It is a normal occurrence for a rezone application to be filed on the basis of a conditional purchase. Ordinances do not prevent this procedure. Finding No. 5, page 3, states that the decision of whether or not sewers are required is yet to be made. On page two the Examiner stated that the King County Health Department would make this decision. Nothing was submitted into the record that this decision had been made. In any case, this subject is not closed but remains to be decided by the King County Health Department. Per that decision the applicant and/or property owner must proceed with the proposal. Since this is fact, it was not included as a condition to the recommendation. Storm water problems in the area are not necessarily pertinent to the rezone, but directly applicable to any construction/remodeling on the site. The Public Works Department, not the Examiner, reviews the storm drainage. Any existing problems should be directed to that department. The B-1 zone 'requires a 10-foot. rear yard setback (Section 4-711.0) . It is hoped that this information satisfies your concerns. Res fully; c eeler Hearing Examiner cc: David Clemens, Associate Planner PartiaG of Record a - , y 1- 4- 7g G , nss 1, f if 23S .. 1S ` J3.. fee % r 1 74 ie. - 2. 2 5• - 7 . .? r a ate, ei., t d acx.: Aei, u ' '`/.€.: iAs-- 7 P • : r ' d .( / o- 2 - g. . Oti.;: 44X- el. 44- 447 ... 4- 2 24., e4- e A.' Ite. t.€ .. ..'. • .. tee- 7t r ev- 0- 0. 2.. p 7, . G2 eLu, c % Qi. I SLv y S , J ..' "- ti-- 4%-. 4 -/ alte27. v- 4-' 4- e- 1. se- ifr" '., •- e„,..... d „ 1,, r.„.„,,, 7 404,,,( 44 ,..,./. 4e.... . i, ii_ x44.,,,,, ., t , a.. t..€ . y.. 4.:,. /..,: fic, 2,(... t7, az...., • /• . ;,, '::••••' s - I 2 lYt C 6 2 . .. 9.:,,..' 0-- vc.)' . .•'• -' . ' . ' : . : ' u 4rrr , u- ate... a __ . . 3 o. x; o: ca:. 6 ry 4-711 v ov,' r1 Jy o/ -b -t 1— ,' c..4 eAQirrr i j'~'- ' z T ram 40/ 4-1 4—red-0-4 x z - /p, r 1 rw ran --r2 OF R JED ZOTIECITYOFRENTON o MUNICIPAL BUILDING IL AVE SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 2.7 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR e LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER p L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 411TEO SEP1 ' November 22, 1978 Mr. J. Clifford Gray 15437 S.E. 132nd Street Renton, WA 98055 RE: File No. R-225-78; J. Clifford Gray Request for Rezone. Dear Mr. Gray: This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved subject to restrictive covenants as noted on the Examiner's report of October 26, 1978, has not been appealed within the second time period following the Examiner's response to the request for reconsideration received on November 6, 1978. Therefore, this application is being submitted to the City Clerk for transmittal to the City Council for final approval. You will receive notification of final approval upon adoption of an ordinance by the City Council. • Sincerely, L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk rile No. R-225-78 J. Clifford Gray DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Arnold Hardin and his wife Carolyn K. Hardin are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington; and J. Clifford' Gray and his wife Bonnie A. Gray have contracted to purchase the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: Lots 29, 30 and 31, Block 16, C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Division No. 1 as recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, Page 74, Records of King County Washington. WHEREAS, the owners and purchasers of said described property, hereinafter the property," desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners and purchasers hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land'hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: LANDSCAPE BUFFERS A 20-foot landscape buffer will be required along the easterly property line exclusively for screening purposes per review and approval of the Planning Department. A 10-foot landscape buffer will be required along the southerly and westerly property lines exclusively for screening purposes per review and approval of the Planning Department. BUILDING SETBACKS A 20-foot building setback will be required along the southerly, westerly and easterly property lines; except that normal building setback restrictions of the B-1 zone will be applied if zoning abutting or adjacent to these property lines is changed to a use of at least the intensity of B-1. WASTE CONTAINERS Exterior waste containers shall be screened from view by single family residences per review and approval of the Planning Department. EXTERIOR STORAGE Exterior storage of materials shall not occur. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action. V c Arnold Hardin, Owner ll 2 6(:7r4_ 1 k/"•! Carolyn K. Hardin, Owner CliffgtfrGray, Purchaser Bonnie A. Gray, Purp`iaser STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING On this V)" day of N1:2, 0a•; 191S, before me personally appeared Arnold Hardin, Carolyn K. Hardin, J. Clifford Gray, Bonnie A. Gray, the persons who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in ,i,• _. z j Renton City Council 11/27/78 Page 3 Consent Agenda - Continued . Motion: Adopting Consent Agenda Items - Page 2 • AWC Request for Association of Washington Cities request that city designate a Legislative ! legislative liaison to. serve as the primary contact person in the Liaison city for legislative ma.t.ters. MOVED BY. PERRY, SECOND STREDICKE TO REFER TO BUDGET COMMITTEE OF THE COUNCIL. CARRIED. Completion of Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason recommended that, City S-209, CBD Sewer Council accept completion of S-209, CBD Sewer .Improvements, by Improvements L National Construction Co. , Inc. as of November 27, 1978: If after 30 days .no liens or- claims are filed and proof of payment of tax liabilities- are received, the retained amount of $12,246. 13 be pa-id, to the contractor. *Council concur in. recommendation. Log Storage Letter from State Department of Natural. Resources advising that Lake Washington Foss Launch and Tu,g Company is phasing out portion of log storage activities along the south side of Lake Washington. *Information. Arav Rezon . J..,Cli_fford Gray Rezone (R-225-78) for property located at Maple SW R-225-7 and SW 12th S t.Hearing, Examiner recommended B-1 with restrictive covenants._ *Refer to Ways and Means Committee for ordinance. Request for Hearing; Examiner's decision re Ray Brown request for rezone Rezone-Brown • (R-226-78): was approval of rezone from G to SR-] .for property R-226-78) located;.at Union Ave.. NE and NE 24th St. *Refer to Ways and Means' Committee; for. ordinance. Claim for f Claim for Damages was filed by Puget Sound Power & Light Co. , 620 Damages i So. Grady Way, in the amount of $1,386. 15 alleging Water Dept. dug up electric facilities. *Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. CORRESPONDENCE AND..CURRENT BUSINESS Public Hearing Letter from GordonEricksen, Planning Director, recommending 12/11/78 Block December 11, 1978 for public hearing in regards to 1979 Housing Grant Program' and Community Development Block Grant. Program: Following discussion, MOVED BY 'STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE TO CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Recess MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL RECESS: CARRIED. Council! recessed at 8:55 p.m. and reconvened at 9:05 p.m. Roll Call : All . Coulnci l ,Members Present. . Talbot House Letter was read from Robert G. Lillie, Executive 'Director, Friends Special Use of. Youth requesting renewal of the Special Use Permit for Talbot Permit-Public;, House. ; Upon inquiry Mike Smith, Planning Dept. , noted council • Meeting 12/11/78 approval] is required once a year for three year Special Use Permit. MOVED .B!Y THORPE; SECOND' SHINPOCH PUBLIC MEETING BE HELD' DECEMBER 11, 1978. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE TO REFER TO COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Request for , Letter was read from Ernest Tonda, President, Renton Historical Relocation of Society requesting consideration and approval for the relocation of Chief Seattle! the Chief Seattle fountain ("Iron Mike") to a more attractive and Fountain suitable location along Mill Ave. South. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND •CLYMER REFER TO THE ADMINISTRATION.Municipal Arts Commission to be contacted.CARRIED. Sewer Service ! Letter Was read from 'Warren Gonnason, Public Works Director, requested to .Dunlap council! review request for sewer service to Dunlap Canyon Apartments Canyon Apts. and reconfirm its earlier action. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE TO . RESCIND; ACTION OF SEPTEMBER 27, 1976 IN AUTHORIZING THE CONNECTION. CARRIED,. 1 • Renton City Council 11/27/78 Page 4 New Business NEW BUSINESS Renton Letter was read from Warren Gonnason, President Renton Management Management Association, concurring in the Mayor's recommendation for a 10% Association .cost of living salary increase for management and non-represented Requests employees.' . Also requesting that authorization and direction be given to the Personnel Director to appear and discuss the study and recommendations that have been completed. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND TRIMM .REFER THE MATTER OF COST OF LIVING TO BUDGET COMMITTEE AND REFER MATTER OF SALARY STUDY TO WAYS AND MEANS. COMMITTEE. Substitute motion by Thorpe, second Shane to refer matter to budget committee. Motion failed. ORIGINAL MOTION CARRIED. Equipment Letter was read, from Ted Bennett, Finanace Dept. , advising Rental Rates no need for increase in equipment rental rates for 1979, but consideration should be given to increasing rates on those pieces of equipment being considered for replacement in 1979. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND CLYMER TO REFER TO BUDGET COMMITTEE. CARRIED.. Councilman Councilman Shane made the following motions which failed for lack . Shane of second and requested they be entered into the record: 'A 2% tax be placed on wagering at Longacres. The city'.add' back $89,000 and return $50 to every senior citizen age 65 and older. Councilman also requested the city establish standards and advertise for City Attorney.Councilman Perry noted for information` that authority for appointment of cityattorney rests with the Mayor and Council only confirms the appointment. Aviation Councilwoman Shinpoch requested the Administration to advise the Committee ' Aviation Committee as .to its present status and authority.: . Mayor requested City Clerk's office research files as to the formation of the Aviation Committee by council action. Preliminary Councilman Stredicke requested,in writing, from the administration any Budget requests that were made for additional money not included in the preliminary budget. Airport Councilman Perry inquired as to jurisdiction over the airport by Jurisdiction the Airport Director and Public Works Director. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND STREDICKE TO REFER MATTER OF REPORTING RELATIONSHIP OF THE AIRPORT DIRECTOR AND THE JURISDICTION OF THE AIRPORT TO THE TRANSPOR- TATION COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION. ROLL CALL: 5-AYE; TRIMM, SHANE, SHINPOCH, STREDICKE, PERRY; 2-NO; CLYMER, THORPE; MOTION CARRIED. 4-Way Stop Councilman Stredicke noted as requested by petition, 4-way stop was Petition installed at the intersection of NE 10th St. and Olympia Ave. NE. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. 9:45 p.m. Maxine E. Motor, Deputy City, Clerk 7 pF R, i.7 i eti hft •, o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 z o op CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR ® LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER co- L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 grED SEPSEwO November 7, 1978 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No.. R-225-78; J. Clifford Gray Rezone Request. Dear Council Members: A request for reconsideration of the referenced rezone application was received by the Examiner on November 6, 1978 within the appeal period established for the request. Attached is the reconsideration request as well as the Examiner's subsequent response, dated November 7, 1978. This is to advise that a new appeal period has been established for the application which will expire on November 21 1978 and the matter will be placed on the Council agenda ovember 27, 1978 if further requests for reconsideration or app al are not received. Sincerel Amp 11P47APIII L.lRick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: City Clerk Planning Department Parties of Record Nov 197$ in , RECEIVED 1 CI of REM" LERK' © FIG ' CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3270 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G) TO BUSINESS DISTRICT (B-1) (R-225-78) WHEREAS under Chapter 7 , Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classification District (G) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classi- fication of said property has been filed with the Planning Department on or about September 20, 1978 , which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about October 24, 1978 , and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City ' s Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof orin,._opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I : The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1) as hereinbelow specified; subject to the findings, conclusions and decision dated October 26, 1978 ; the Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit : 1- ga See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. Said property being located at Northeast corner of Maple Avenue S .W. and S.W. 12th Street) AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed by Petitioner-owners on or about November 13, 1978 and recorded in the office of the Director of Records and Elections Receiving No. 7811040681 and which said Covenants are hereby incorporated and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. SECTION II : This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five ( 5) days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 11th day of December, 1978. tj Maxine E.. Motor, Deputy City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this llth day of December, 1978 . cat-%7 Charles ,Delaurenti, Mayor r Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: December 15 , 1978 ExJ•4 / a / 7 Lots 29, 30 and 31 , Block 16, C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition No. 1 , as recorded in the book of plats, Volume 17 Page 74 records- of King County, Washington s l_ File No. R-225-78 f J. Clifford Gray• DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Arnold Hardin and his wife Carolyn K. Hardin are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington; • and J. Clifford Gray and his wife Bonnie A. Gray have contracted to purchase the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: Lots 29, 30 and 31, Block 16, C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Division CV No. 1 as recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, Page 74, Records of King County Washington. WHEREAS, the owners and purchasers of said described property-, ,hereinafter the property," desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners and purchasers hereby establish, grant • and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their . successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: LANDSCAPE BUFFERS A 20-foot landscape buffer will be required along the easterly. property line ' exclusively for screening purposes per review and approval of the Planning- Department. , • A 10-foot landscape buffer will be required along the southerly and westerly property lines exclusively for screening purposes per review and approval of the Planning Department. BUILDING SETBACKS A 20-foot building setback will be required along the southerly, westerly and easterly property lines; except that normal building setback restrictions .of the B-1 zone will be applied if zoning abutting or adjacent to these property lines is changed to a use of at least the intensity of B-1. WASTE CONTAINERS Exterior waste containers shall be screened from view by single family residences per review and approval of the Planning Department. EXTERIOR STORAGE Exterior storage of materials shall not occur. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in.the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enfOreaent proceeding be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action, SV Arnold Hardin, Owner atte CarolynHardin, Owner Cif Gray, chase 1111 2) B6 ie A. Gray, Pur er 1 STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING On this 13_ day ok No4em\45 r 191S, before me personally appeared Arnold Hardin, Carolyn K. Hardin, J. Clifford Gray, Bonnie A. Gray, the persons who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. i b " gliktra••• 4 41%. tit/fog\VAI: Notary Public in and for, +•to-- of Washington, residing. ; : " fit\ Y,'•':1' if' y: 7'I :3. y* i:>,.,^"`. I.r'r,.' S.t'h^ - •„(' ,t:jF `A ITV Yi' ..`" r.;,..,''• • 1`f•,l(.t.•C.^/ r. P+ j ;: WASHINGTON,"4-7-:.1 /0 off!/ 3ir:• -)x ORDINANCE.NOt:327d V t,v, ,••.Z.,THECITY,;OF RENTON;f 1 W'.A''S•H,'I,M;G-TO:N '' Y ivj i 'CHANGING THE'ZON-,: ING' CLASSIFICATION."' :4, I `' •OFCERTAIN•PROPER •i Affidavit of Publication C.n,r TIES'WITHIN THE CITY''; OF 'RENTON:. 'FROM . i. •` 'GENERAL ;CLASSIFI- L CATION;'DISTRICT.(G);; STATE OF WASHINGTON TO' ',BUSINESS DIS- ' COUNTY OF KING ss' TRICT.(Br1),(R-225-78) WHEREAS under Chap- ter 7„Title IV(Building'Regu-' lations),..,of Ordinance 'No. rf QflCG•••, 3' being first duly sworn on 1628.known'as the"Code of General,'Ordihances"of the;,j City'of'Renton",as,amend oath,deposes and says that glle is the chi C lGr k of ed, an•d the maps and re ports,adopted in,conjunction THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) therewith,, the, property' l times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and hereinbelow'described'has -.• has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred heretofore` been'zoned'as '' to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- G'eneral,'Classifibatlon ,Dis- ; paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, trict•(G);•and ' ' and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained WHEREAS a'proper pets- ; at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton tfon for change of. zone Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Classifloation'ofsaidproper Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, Ay has'been:'filed-with the. Planning.Department;on:or Washington.That the annexed is a about September 20, 1978, which;petItion°'was duly re= Tarred ,to:'the Hearing Ex-,, eminer•:for.'investigation; study,-•.and' public hearing, as it waspublished in regular issues(and bee a held',here ng'havin r "1, been held.,,thereon on or not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period about Octotier24,1978,.and i said`matterhavingbeen duly " i considered"by the'Hearing of 1 consecutive issues,commencing on the Examiner•'and ;Said zoning :Irequest;being:'in''conformity. :., withthe City's Comprehen- 15 day of...DeC., 197.8 ,and ending the sive Plan„as amended,and the City'¢ouncil•h'aving duly considered:all matters'relev- ? ant thereto; and all.parties day of 19 both dates having,+beep heard'appear:- inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- ing,in support thereof'or in scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee ' opposition .thereto, 'NOW THEREFORE, .-•• charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $.57... gwhich THE CITY COUNCIL'OF' THE CITY, OF RENTON, . i has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the WASHINGTON; DO•OR-, , first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent DAIN:AS FOLLOWS: • insertion. SECTION'.I:The•following , described property in the vc... ,_ 6---A,k.9-7 City of. 'Renton Is-hereby i rezoned,to Business'District i B 1') ,'a's'.'h.e einbelow;i @h'. .t' 1er specified;subject to the fInd= Ings, concluslons'and'decl- sign,'dated' ,October. 26,' Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19 day of 1978;.the'Planning:Director 1 Is" hereby; authorizedr•ands;'; directed to.change;the maps Dec. , 19..!7 . ofthe Zoning Ordinance,as'i amended;to'evidence,;sald i 22 rezoning;to-wlt: '. • See .'Exhibit "A", at-:' Notary Publi in and for the State of Washi ton, tached'hereto and made residing at Kent, King ounty.a part.hereofasiffullyset, forth"herein:.• . Said property being I, Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June located. at ''Northeast;' 9th, 1955. corner of;Maple Avenue ,, S:W:' and" S.W. 12th Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, Street),, . adopted by the newspapers of the State. • AND SUBJECT.FORTH-'1 ER to that certain Declare- tion;of Restrictive 'Coven-,; ants.executed byPetitioner- owners on': •abo'u'f:' November 13, : 78';and—; recorded In,the Ice•of.the, V.P.C.Form No.87 Director, of ,R ' rds; and'.; Elections Receiving,. •No..', 7811040881,and-which said,{ Covenants:are:herebyincor- goaded.;and made a-part s, hereof,as'if'fully.set'forth: , SECTION-al: This Ordl- nan`ce'shall be•effective up- on`its passage,apf royal and ti,„ `five;(_)days after its publica- tion::, , PASSED' BY"THE°CITY, i, COUNCIL'-this'11th,d,ay..ol December"1.978.. ' Mazlne E. Motor, Deputy City'Clerk'! APPROVED.•BY'.THE ;i MAYOR=this'.11th 'day.`of. December,1978: " i. -Charles J.'Delaurenti, Mayor Approved:as,to form: ;; LawrenceJ:Warren,,' ,' • City,Attorney' ' i" • • . EXHIBIT',!Ai!:• L'ots.29;:30,and 31;,'Block'18,_'. C: D.•Hillman's Earlington,{ Carriana'Addition,No:1.as1 efr Renton City Council 12/4/78 Page 2 Public Hearing - Continued Public Hearing PERRY, THORPE, SHINPOCH; 3-NO: STREDICKE, SHANE, TRIMM. MOTION 1979 Budget Cont. CARRIED. Resolution #2232 MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND "THORPE TO ADOPT THE, RESOLUTION AS PREVIOUSLY Differential ' READ WITH 11.54% DIFFERENTIAL PAY- BETWEEN CAPTAIN AND BATTALION Pay Fire Dept. CHIEF AND THE AMENDMENT OF 8% DIFFERENTIAL'..PAY BETWEEN BATTALION CHIEF AND. CHIEF. AND THE LONGEVITY CLAUSE BE INCLUDED AS PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED BY COUNCIL. ROLL CALL: .4-AYE: CLYMER, PERRY, THORPE, SHINPOCH;. 3-NO: STREDICKE, SHANE, TRIMM. MOTION CARRIED. Resolution #2233 MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PREVIOUSLY Differential READ WITH DIFFERENTIAL PAY BETWEEN SERGEANT AND LIEUTENANT AT 13%, Pay Police Dept. LIEUTENANT AND CAPTAIN:AT 11%, AND AMENDMENT OF CAPTAIN AND. CHIEF AT 8% WITH ADDITIONAL CLAUSE TO INCLUDE EXCEPT •LONGEVITY WHICH SHALL BE THE SAME AS GRANTED TO ALL, OTHER MANAGEMENT. PERSONNEL. CARRIED. Motion by Clymer, Second Thorpe-to include Association of Washington Cities Dues; Roll Call: 3-AYE:"Clymer, Thorpe, Shinpoch; 4-NO: Perry, Stredicke, Shane,' Trimm.'. 'Motion, Failed. Motion to MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. Adopt 1979 CARRIED,: . MOVED BY CLYMER., SECOND THORPE TO ADOPT THE 1979 BUDGET Budget AS AMENDED AND FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING MONEY AS SHOWN. Total.. 20,961,056 Balanced: CARRIED.: (See Budget Ordinance this ' page .and attached amendmentsa; Recess MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY TO RECESS. CARRIED. Council recessed at 9:25 p.m.', and reconvened at 9:4.5 p.m. Roll Call All council members present. •, ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ordinance #3267 Ordinance was read adopting the- 1979 Annual Budget. MOVED BY CLYMER, 1979 Budget , SECOND SHINPOCH TO .ADVANCETO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS.CARRIED. After readings MOVED. BY CLYMER; SECOND SHINPOCH TO ADOPT AS READ. ' Budget total $20,961,056) , ROLL CALL: ' 6-AYE: CLYMER, PERRY, THORPE, STREDICKE, SHINPOCH,aTRIMM:, 1-NO SHANE. CARRIED. Ordinance #3268 . Ways and Means Committee'ChairmanStredicke .presented committee Springbrook report recommending second and final readings of an ordinance Annexation annexing certain territory to the City, known as Springbrook. First .reading:was°,.11/27/78. 'The area is located south of SW 43rd/ Carr Road, East.of S.R. #167";and. North of South 192nd Street. MOVED::BY STREDICKE, SECOND 'SHANE.",TO 'ADOPT-THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL,CALL: ALL AYES. ,CARRIED:,:.'; . Ways and Means Committee. report-recommended the following Ordinances for fi rst reading: r ,;" _` Brown/Strand ' Ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of certain Rezone properties within the City...from ;G"'to. SR-1. MOVED BY STREDICKE, R-226-78 SECOND. SHINPOCH ,REFER, ORD.INANCE BACK TO'THE .WAYS AND MEANS -COMMITTEE. CARRIED Gray Rezone Ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of certain R-225-78 properties. within the city .from'-;G 'to B-1. ' MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER REFER ORDINANCE;;;BACK.TO THE. WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Cable TV Ordinance was read 'amending,City Code entitled Code of General Conduits Ordinances relating to Cable TV Conduits. , MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS 'COMMITTEE. CARRIED. . " Renton City Council 12/11/78 Page 3 Ordinances and Resolutions - Continued ORDINANCE #3270 Ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of certain Gray Rezone properties within the City from General Classification District (G) R-225-78 to Business District (B-1). Rezone requested by Clifford Gray. First reading 12/4/78. The area is located at 224 SW 12th St, between Maple Ave. SW and Rainier Ave. So. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. ORDINANCE #3271 Ordinance was read amending city code relating to Cable TV Conduits. Undergrounding The Cable TV Conduits shall be undergrounded at the same time as Cable TV Conduits other basic utilities are installed to serve the development, with the cost of such installation to be taken care of by the developer and/or landowner. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 6-AYE: CLYMER, PERRY, THORPE, STREDICKE, SHINPOCH, TRIMM; 1-NO: SHANE. CARRIED. The Ways and Means Committee report recommended the following Ordinances for first reading: ORDINANCE #3272 Ordinance was read for vacating a portion of an alley between Alley Vacation Williams Ave. South and Burnett Ave. South as requested by Between Burnett Robert McLendon and Alex Cugini . MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND Williams Aves. SHINPOCH TO ADVANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. So. at So. 2nd After readings MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER TO ADOPT St. THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. ORDINANCE #3273 Ordinance was read amending city code relating to cloth signs Cloth Signs Over over public right-of-way and eliminating fee. Moved by Stredicke, Public Right-of- Second Clymer to refer back to Ways and Means. SUBSTITUTE MOTION Ways BY SHINPOCH, SECOND SHANE TO ADVANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. After readings MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Garbage Rates Ordinance was read amending city code relating to revised garbage rates. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER TO REFER BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Equipment Ordinance was read amending new quipment rental rates to be effective Rental Rates as of January 1, 1979. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER TO REFER BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Inspection Ordinance was read amending city code relating to inspection fees Fees Public Ways and Property) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND STREDICKE TO REFER BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Inspection Ordinance was read amending city code relating to inspection fees Fees Uniform Building Code). MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER TO REFER BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Reserve Fund Ordinance was read creating and establishing a special fund Unemployment known as the cumulative reserve fund for unemployment compensation. Compensation MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER TO REFER BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. VOUCHER APPROVAL The Ways and Means Committee recommended approval for payment of Vouchers No. 20575 through No. 20755 (Machine voids #20569-#20574) in the amount of $509,821. 74 having received departmental approval as to receipt of merchandise and/or services. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY TO APPROVE VOUCHERS AS DRAFTED BY ADMINISTRATION. CARRIED. Funds to Provide Ways and Means Committee report recommended that the matter of For Five 21-R drafting a Resolution for the transfer of funds to provide for the Reclasses five 21-R reclasses provided for in the budget be referred to the Ways and Means Committee. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER TO CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Renton City Council 12/11/78 Page 4 Consent Agenda CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to all Council, members and adopted by one motion without separate discussion. (Adopting motion to follow agenda items. ) Appointment Letter from Mayor Delaurenti reappointed Mr. Walt Dragin to Fire Civil Service Civil Service Commission for a six-year term to be effective Commission through December 31, 1984. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Appointment Letter from Mayor Delaurenti reappointed Mrs. Mary Mattson to Board of the Board of Ethics for a four-year term to be effective through Ethics December, 1982. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Appointment Letter from Mayor Delaurenti reappointed Mrs. Barbara Schellert Planning to the Planning Commission for a three-year term to be effective Commission through January 31, 1981. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Appointments Letter from Mayor Delaurenti appointed Mr. Lloyd Meeks and Mrs. Municipal Arts Mrs. Jackie Aspaas, and the reppointment of Mrs. Sylva Coppock Commission to the Municipal Arts Commission for a three-year term to be effective through December 31, 1981. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Claim for Claim for damages was filed by Mary McDonald, 10923 Rainier Damages Ave. So. , Seattle alleging injury from fall on sidewalk. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Adoption of MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY TO ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA. Consent Agenda CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Larry Howe Request for rezone filed by Larry Howe for R-2 to R-3 for propertyRezonelocatedJeffersonAve. NE, between NE 12th and NE 16th. HearingExaminerdecisionwasapprovalwithrestrictivecovenants. R-235-78.Councilman Perry explained request for appeal which was filed aftertheappealperiodhadended. *MOVED BY THORPE,SECOND PERRY REFER MATTER OF REZONE AND POSSIBLE APPEAL TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. Substitute motion by Shane that the matter be voted on at this time. Motion failed for lack of second. *ORIGINAL MOTION CARRIED. Added Items MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND SHANE THAT THE ADDED ITEMS BE INCLUDED ON NEXT WEEKS AGENDA. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Naming of New MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH TO NAME THE NEW FIRE STATIONFireStationTHECHARLESJ. DELAURENTI FIRE STATION. CARRIED. Election MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND PERRY TO OPEN NOMINATIONS FOR COUNCILCouncilPRESIDENT. CARRIED. Councilwoman Thorpe nominated BarbaraPresidentShinpochforPresidentoftheCouncilfor1979. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE NOMINATIONS BE CLOSED. CARRIED. MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND SHANE A UNANIMOUS VOTE OF COUNCIL FOR SHINPOCH. CARRIED. Councilwoman Shinpoch named Council President commencing January,1979. Election MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE TO OPEN NOMINATIONS FOR COUNCILCouncilPRESIDENTPROTEM. CARRIED. Nomination of Trimm by CouncilmanPresidentPerry. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE NOMINATIONS BE CLOSED.Pro tem CARRIED. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND THORPE A UNAMINOUS VOTE OF COUNCILFORTRIMM. CARRIED. Councilman Trimm named Council President Pro tem commencing January, 1979. OF /24, A. 4$THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o mmn CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9, 0 co L. RICK BEELER . 235-25930 44.1.E0 SEP1E' O Q December 28, 1978 Mr. Clifford Gray 15437 S.E. 132nd Renton, WA 98055 RE: File No. R-225-78; J. Clifford Gray Request for Rezone. Dear Mr. Gray: This is to notify you that the above referenced request was approved at the meeting of the Renton City Council of December 11, 1978 by adoption of Ordinance No. 3270. Sincerely, L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: P -nning Department City Clerk