HomeMy WebLinkAboutSR_RainierDogERC_FINALDEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Project Location Map
SR_RainierDogERC_FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT
ERC Meeting Date: June 3, 2024
Project File Number: PR24-000018
Project Name: Rainier Dog Resort and Spa
Land Use File Number: LUA24-000093, SA-H, CU-H, ECF
Project Manager: Andrew Van Gordon, Associate Planner
Owner: KKDM LLC, P.O. Box 1121, Bellevue, WA 98009
Applicant/Contact: Owen Keeper, LMA Architects, 140 Lakeside Ave, Suite 310, Seattle, WA 98122
Project Location: 900 S Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057
Project Summary: The applicant is requesting a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Hearing
Examiner Site Plan Review and Environmental Review to establish a boarding and
daycare facility for dogs. The project site is located at 900 S Grady Way (APN
1723059021). The site is zoned Center Downtown (CD) and is within Urban Design
District A. Access is not proposed to be revised. Interior improvements, with no
exterior work on the building, is proposed. The existing gravel area of the property
is proposed to be enclosed with fencing and associated on-site landscaping
between the fence and right-of-way. Hours of operation are proposed to be 7 a.m.
to 6 p.m. with outdoor sessions between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. The site is located
within a High Seismic Hazard Area and the Wellhead Protection Area Downtown:
Zone 2.
Exist. Bldg. Area SF: 7,290 sq. ft. Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint):
Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross):
N/A
N/A
Site Area: 38,180 sq. ft. Total Building Area GSF: 7,290 sq. ft.
STAFF
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a
Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M).
DocuSign Envelope ID: 53E579AF-21BE-47B4-9BC7-CC82CA1C6943
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
Rainier Dog Resort and Spa
Staff Report to the Environmental Review Committee
LUA24-000093, SA-H, CU-H, ECF
Report of June 3, 2024 Page 2 of 9
SR_RainierDogERC_FINAL
PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION / BACKGROUND
The proposal is to establish a dog boarding and daycare facility on 900 S Grady Way. The existing on-site building
is proposed to be incorporated into the project with no proposed exterior improvements (Exhibit 15). Interior
improvements, to include demolition of some interior walls, construction of new interior walls and cosmetic
enhancements such as wall and floor finishes (Exhibit 16). Reconfiguration of the existing two (2) restrooms for
ADA compliance and improved accessibility is also proposed. Establishment of a fenced outdoor area with
associated on-site vegetation is proposed for the dogs to play and go to the bathroom. Hours of operation are from
7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. with outdoor group play sessions occurring between 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. A maximum
of 50 dogs are proposed to be at the facility at any single time.
PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project
impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations.
A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation
Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials:
Issue a DNS-M with a 14-day appeal period
B. Mitigation Measures
1. The facility shall keep all windows closed at all times, except when needed to be open for unique
circumstances such as cleaning or life and safety. Doors shall only be opened for entering and
exiting the building and/or life and safety circumstances and shall not remain open beyond the
immediate need.
2. The project shall comply with the recommendations of the Rainier Dog Resort and Spa Noise Study,
prepared by Alan Burt, P.E. and Joshua Wah-Blumberg of SSA acoustics dated April 30, 2024.
3. The applicant’s acoustical consultant shall review the project’s construction and building permit
plans to verify compliance with the acoustic report. The acoustical consultant shall submit a sealed
letter stating they have reviewed the construction and building permit plans and in their opinion
the plans and specifications meet the intent of the report.
4. The applicant shall provide an Inadvertent Discoveries Plan prepared by a qualified professional
with the civil construction permit application if any ground disturbance cuts below asphalt and/or
fill into native soils. The IDP shall be reviewed and approved by the Current Planning Project
Manager prior to permit issuance. Notice shall be provided to Concerned Tribes to have a tribal
monitor on-site if archaeological work or monitoring is performed.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 53E579AF-21BE-47B4-9BC7-CC82CA1C6943
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
Rainier Dog Resort and Spa
Staff Report to the Environmental Review Committee
LUA24-000093, SA-H, CU-H, ECF
Report of June 3, 2024 Page 3 of 9
SR_RainierDogERC_FINAL
C. Exhibits
Exhibit 1: Environmental Review Committee (ERC) Report
Exhibit 2: Site Plan
Exhibit 3: Project Narrative
Exhibit 4: Rainier Dog Resort and Spa Property Line Noise Report prepared by Alan Burt, P.E. and
Joshua Wah-Blumberg of SSA acoustics dated April 30, 2024
Exhibit 5: Transportation Concurrency Memo dated May 14, 2024
Exhibit 6: Duwamish Letter dated March 18, 2024
Exhibit 7: Staff Response to Duwamish Tribe Comments dated April 4, 2024
Exhibit 8: Public Comment from Ms. Judy received March 28, 2024
Exhibit 9: Staff Response to Ms. Judy
Exhibit 10: Fence Detail
Exhibit 11: SEPA Environmental Checklist prepared January 25, 2024
Exhibit 12: Hydrogeologic Assessment prepared by Scott S. Riegel of Earth Solutions NW, LLC,
dated February 6, 2024
Exhibit 13: Rainier Dog Resort & Spa – Renton, WA Trip Generation Memo, prepared by Spenser
Haynie of Transportation Engineering NorthWest (TENW) dated April 19, 2024
Exhibit 14: Previous Tenant Lease
Exhibit 15: Exterior Elevations
Exhibit 16: Floor Plans
Exhibit 17: Advisory Notes
D. Environmental Impacts
The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the
applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction
with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following
probable impacts:
1. Earth
Impacts: The proposed improvements include interior renovation of the existing structure, removal of
existing chain link fencing to be replaced with vinyl fencing with a 15-foot (15’) landscaping strip
between the fencing and the property line along S Grady Way and Williams Ave S, and construction of
a trash/recycling enclosure on an existing concrete pad on the north side of the existing building
(Exhibit 3). Per the site plan (Exhibit 2) a new ADA accessible pathway will be constructed through an
existing vegetated area in the southwest portion of the property connecting the existing on-site
sidewalk with the sidewalk in the right-of-way of S Grady Way. Ground disturbance would be limited
to removal/installation of fencing, removal of asphalt for new landscaping, planting of vegetation and
construction of the ADA accessible pathway. Calculations for fill and grade were not provided, but Staff
expects it to be minimal as the amount of ground disturbance would be minimal and any needed
mitigation could be conditioned through the civil permit.
Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended.
Nexus: Not applicable.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 53E579AF-21BE-47B4-9BC7-CC82CA1C6943
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
Rainier Dog Resort and Spa
Staff Report to the Environmental Review Committee
LUA24-000093, SA-H, CU-H, ECF
Report of June 3, 2024 Page 4 of 9
SR_RainierDogERC_FINAL
2. Air
Impacts: Temporary impacts to air from interior improvements, such as painting and drywall cutting,
would occur. It is not expected that typical earthwork construction equipment and vehicle exhaust
would occur as the type and intensity of exterior improvements is not proposed. Potential items such
as exterior dust control, if it were to occur, can be mitigated through the use of temporary erosion
control measures, watering or other measures to remediate impacts as needed. Per the SEPA
Environmental Checklist, prepared on January 25, 2024 (Exhibit 10), the General Contractor and all
subcontractors would keep the jobsite clean and comply with all the safety measures of each trade.
Temporary emissions control can be conditioned through the civil construction permit.
Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended.
Nexus: Not applicable.
3. Water
a. Ground Water
Impacts: COR Maps identifies the project area as being within the Downtown Wellhead Protection
Area Zone 2. The project does not include a prohibited facility as outlined in RMC 4-3-050, Critical
Area Regulations. Per the Environmental Checklist, no groundwater would be withdrawn, and no
waste material will be discharged into the ground. Due to the concern about animal waste in the
wellhead protection area, the application provided a Hydrogeologic Assessment, prepared by Scott
S. Riegel of Earth Solutions NW LLC, dated February 6, 2024 (Exhibit 11). Per the assessment, the
site was visited in January 2024 to observe surface conditions. In the opinion of the assessment
author, no adverse impacts to the local groundwater would occur. Based on the limited scope of
the project and no significant change in use, no additional prohibitions or requirements would be
required above those outlined in the Zone 2 code sections of RMC 4-3-050, Critical Area
Regulations. It is expected that erosion control measures, if needed, can be conditioned through
the civil construction permit.
Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended.
Nexus: Not applicable.
4. Vegetation
Impacts: The site is made up of a large gravel area, existing building, surface parking and minimal
landscaping in the southwest portion with some low hedges abutting the sidewalk along S Grady Way.
A conceptual landscape plan was not provided; however, the proposed site plan does show the location
of proposed plantings. They are concentrated along S Grady Way and Williams Ave S between the
newly-proposed fence and the right-of-way. A portion between the existing building and Williams Ave
S is also proposed. This would also include the proposed refuse/recycling enclosure area. Further, on-
site vegetation is required along the shared property line with 536 Williams Ave S to meet zoning code
requirements for the minimum side yard setback when a lot zoned CD is adjacent to a residentially
zone lot; 536 Williams Ave S is zoned Residential – 14 (R-14). A 15-foot (15’) wide partially sight-
obscuring landscaped strip or a five-foot (5’) wide fully sight-obscuring landscaped strip and a solid six-
foot (6’) high barrier along the common boundary is required. Review of the fence and associated
vegetation would occur during the civil construction permit by the Planning Project Manager;
installation would be required prior to final inspection.
The City received a letter from the Duwamish Tribe (Exhibit 6) strongly recommending that only native
vegetation be used to enhance native avian life and native pollinators as well as to mitigate seasonal
urban flooding. Native vegetation and location of vegetation can be required through the Site Plan
Review application.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 53E579AF-21BE-47B4-9BC7-CC82CA1C6943
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
Rainier Dog Resort and Spa
Staff Report to the Environmental Review Committee
LUA24-000093, SA-H, CU-H, ECF
Report of June 3, 2024 Page 5 of 9
SR_RainierDogERC_FINAL
Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended.
Nexus: Not applicable.
5. Environmental Health
a. Noise
Impacts: City staff received public comment (Exhibit 8) with concerns about potential noise issues
impacting the surrounding neighborhood. In response, staff requested the applicant complete a
noise study by a qualified professional. In response to staff’s request, the applicant provided the
Rainier Dog Resort and Spa Property Line Noise Report prepared by Alan Burt, P.E. and Joshua
Wah-Blumberg of SSA acoustics dated April 30, 2024 (Exhibit 4).
SSA acoustics measured the existing ambient noise level on site hourly over a 24-hour period from
12:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. on April 9, 2024 at one (1) location northeast of the building at the shared
property line with 541 Wells Ave S (APN 1723059054). Short-term measurements were conducted
on April 11, 2024 at four (4) on-site locations. It was found that the hourly decibels ranged from 58
to 65 decibels during the day and 55 to 63 decibels during the night. The short-term measurements
found the ambient noise level decibels ranging from 57 to 67 decibels with the loudest location
being between the existing building and S Grady Way (67 decibels) to the south and the quietest
being between the existing building and Williams Ave S to the north. The building itself is metal
frame construction with insulation, structural sheeting, metal siding with gypsum wallboard (GWB)
on the interior of the walls. The GWB in the kennel room, holding area, reception and luxury suites
extends all the way to the ceiling. The BWG on the inside of the wall of the playrooms stops at
approximately 12 feet (12’). There is a glass, exterior double door to the reception area on the
southwest side of the building, a metal exterior double door and metal roll-up door to the second
playroom on the northwest side of the building. The exterior door to the kennel room has a full set
of acoustical seals that prevent noise from passing through gaps at the perimeter of the door. Noise
reduction from existing improvements would reduce decibel levels from 25 to 42 decibels. The
least reduced area is the second playroom façade with the most being the holding area façade.
Based on predicted noise levels of dogs, the noise level of one (1) dog barking is 89 decibels up to
104 decibels.
During the daytime, up to 20 dogs would be allowed in the first playroom with up to five (5) dogs
in the second playroom. Up to 18 dogs would be kept in the holding area. All dogs would be
required to pass a temperament evaluation to be allowed into the outdoor yard area for play; if a
dog starts barking it would be returned to the kennel. All dogs would be kept in the kennels or
suites unless they are in the indoor playrooms or in the outdoor play and bathroom areas.
During the nighttime up to 28 dogs would be kept inside the kennel room with up to six (6) dogs in
the luxury suites.
If the maximum number of dogs barking in each room occurs the average noise level would range
from 96 decibels to 104 decibels with the maximum being 111 decibels to 119 decibels.
The report identifies that Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-60 identifies residential
properties as Class A EDNA and commercial properties as Class B EDNA. Under WAC 173 -60,
Maximum Permissible Environmental Noise Levels, noise from a Class B EDNA property is limited
as:
Class A EDNA Receiver: Noise is limited to 57 decibels during daytime house. During nighttime
hours, between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. the maximum permissible sound level is 47
decibels.
Class B EDNA Receiver: Noise is limited to 60 decibels 24 hours a day.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 53E579AF-21BE-47B4-9BC7-CC82CA1C6943
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
Rainier Dog Resort and Spa
Staff Report to the Environmental Review Committee
LUA24-000093, SA-H, CU-H, ECF
Report of June 3, 2024 Page 6 of 9
SR_RainierDogERC_FINAL
Further, during any hour of the day or night the applicable noise limitations may be exceeded for
any receiving property by no more than:
a) Five (5) decibels for a total of 15 minutes in any one (1) hour period; or
b) 10 decibels for a total of five (5) minutes in any one (1) hour period; or
c) 15 decibels for a total of one and a half (1.5) minutes in any one (1) hour period.
The report calculated predictive average and maximum noise levels at neighboring receiving
properties during the daytime and nighttime for interior barking levels. Properties generally to the
north are commercial with properties generally to the south commercial. The report found that
average interior barking levels would meet limitations and would be similar or less than existing
ambient noise levels. It also found that the predicted maximum interior barking levels would meet
limitations on allowed temporary decibel levels. No further interior mitigation is recommended.
However, the analysis was completed with all doors and windows closed. While it isn’t realistic to
expect all doors and windows to remain closed at all times, if they were to be left open it is
expected that noise levels would increase. As such, staff recommends as a mitigation measure that
the facility keep all windows closed at all times, except when needed to be open for unique
circumstances such as cleaning or life and safety. Doors shall only be opened for entering and
exiting the building and/or life and safety circumstances and shall not remain open beyond the
immediate need.
With regards to exterior noise levels, up to 10 total dogs would be outside at any time. Outdoor
play is expected to be generally quiet, and if a dog barks, it would be immediately returned to its
kennel in the building. For the purposes of the study, the report indicates it assumes that noise
from a dog barking in the yard would be instantaneous and only last a short duration, so the
maximum noise levels are compared to the 75 decibel one and a half (1.5) minute daytime code
limits at the receiving properties. It was found that as currently developed exterior noise levels
would exceed allowed levels. Proposed noise mitigation includes:
• Limiting the yard area available to the dogs and ensure that dogs are not able to be within
15 feet (15’) of the north and northeast properties (536 Williams Ave S and 541 Wells Ave
S).
• Construct noise barriers on the north, west, east and south sides of the yard. The top of
the noise barriers that run along the north side of yards should be at least eight feet (8’)
above grade. The remaining noise barriers should be at least six feet (6’) above grade.
• Construct the noise barriers with a solid material that has a surface mass of at least four
(4.0) pounds per square foot. The following are common barrier materials that meet this
requirement:
o Two (2) layers of three fourths inch (3/4”) exterior grade plywood.
o Two (2) layers of 16-gauge sheet metal.
o Two (2) layers of HardiePanel.
• Install acoustical panels on all available surfaces along the dog-facing side of the barriers.
Panels need to have a minimum NRC of 0.80. Open metal grid materials, such as chicken
wire, may be added to the face of the sound absorbing material to prevent dogs from
chewing on it. Recommended products for this application are:
o Two inch (2”) Polysorb.
o Two inch (2”) thick FSorb.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 53E579AF-21BE-47B4-9BC7-CC82CA1C6943
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
Rainier Dog Resort and Spa
Staff Report to the Environmental Review Committee
LUA24-000093, SA-H, CU-H, ECF
Report of June 3, 2024 Page 7 of 9
SR_RainierDogERC_FINAL
As such, staff recommends as a mitigation measure that the project comply with the
recommendations of the Rainier Dog Resort and Spa Noise Study, prepared by Alan Burt, P.E. and
Joshua Wah-Blumberg of SSA acoustics dated April 30, 2024 and any future addenda. Additionally,
staff recommends the applicant’s acoustical consultant review the project’s construction and
building permit plans to verify compliance with the acoustic report(s). The acoustical consultant
shall submit a sealed letter stating they have reviewed the construction and building permit plans
and in their opinion the plans and specifications meet the intent of the report(s).
Mitigation Measures:
1. The facility shall keep all windows closed at all times, except when needed to be open for
unique circumstances such as cleaning or life and safety. Doors shall only be opened for
entering and exiting the building and/or life and safety circumstances and shall not remain
open beyond the immediate need.
2. The project shall comply with the recommendations of the Rainier Dog Resort and Spa
Noise Study, prepared by Alan Burt, P.E. and Joshua Wah-Blumberg of SSA acoustics, dated
April 30, 2024 and any future addenda.
3. The applicant’s acoustical consultant shall review the project’s construction and building
permit plans to verify compliance with the acoustic report(s). The acoustical consultant
shall submit a sealed letter stating they have reviewed the construction and building
permit plans and in their opinion the plans and specifications meet the intent of the
report(s).
Nexus: State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Environmental Review; RMC 4-9-030, Conditional Use
Permits; RMC 4-9-200, Master Plan and Site Plan Review.
6. Aesthetics
Impacts: The applicant is proposing an eight-foot (8’) tall fence (Exhibit 9). The fence would enclose an
existing exterior mostly gravel area to be used for exterior play and bathroom areas. Fencing with
sound paneling is proposed along the northern boundaries of the enclosure with the remainder being
vinyl fencing. Fencing in this northern area follows the general location of existing chain link fencing
including a small portion which appears to be off site; this can be conditioned through the land use
permitting process to be placed on site. Other portions of the fence would be parallel with the right-
of-way of S Grady Way and Williams Ave S. In these areas a 15-foot (15’) wide on-site landscaping strip
between the fence and the right-of-way is proposed. Additional, vegetation is proposed between the
existing building and Williams Ave S. The type of proposed vegetation is unknown; however, type of
vegetation and density can be conditioned through the site plan review.
Per the project narrative, no exterior work is proposed on the existing building (Exhibit 3). Building
improvements would be limited to interior work. A pedestrian connection would be made between
the building entrance and the sidewalk for ADA accessibility. The property is within Urban Design
District ‘A’. Review of applicable standards, as well as the overall site design, would occur during the
site plan review application. It is anticipated that the City’s Urban Design Standards and site plan review
criteria would adequately mitigate aesthetic impacts of the proposal.
Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended.
Nexus: Not applicable.
7. Historic and Cultural Preservation
Impacts: The City received public comment from the Duwamish Tribe that the project is located within
a mile of at least eight (8) Duwamish place names and near several known archaeological sites (Exhibit
6). The Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) WISAARD
DocuSign Envelope ID: 53E579AF-21BE-47B4-9BC7-CC82CA1C6943
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
Rainier Dog Resort and Spa
Staff Report to the Environmental Review Committee
LUA24-000093, SA-H, CU-H, ECF
Report of June 3, 2024 Page 8 of 9
SR_RainierDogERC_FINAL
predictive model indicates that a survey is highly advised with a very high risk for encountering cultural
resources. As such, based on the information provided and understanding of the project, the
Duwamish Tribe recommends an inadvertent discovery plan (IDP) if any ground disturbance cuts below
asphalt/fill into native soils. In the event that any archaeological work or monitoring is performed, the
Tribe would like notification and to have the opportunity to be present if or when an archeologist is on
site. As such, staff recommends as a mitigation measure, that the applicant provide an Inadvertent
Discoveries Plan prepared by a qualified professional with the civil construction permit application if
any ground disturbance cuts below asphalt and/or fill into native soils. The IDP shall be reviewed and
approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to permit issuance. Notice shall be provided
to Concerned Tribes to have a tribal monitor on-site if archaeological work or monitoring is performed.
Mitigation Measures:
1. The applicant shall provide an Inadvertent Discoveries Plan prepared by a qualified
professional with the civil construction permit application if any ground disturbance cuts
below asphalt and/or fill into native soils. The IDP shall be reviewed and approved by the
Current Planning Project Manager prior to permit issuance. Notice shall be provided to
Concerned Tribes to have a tribal monitor on-site if archaeological work or monitoring is
performed.
Nexus: City of Renton Comprehensive Goals and Policies, L-AA, L-45 and L-46; Chapter 27.53 RCW,
Archaeological Sites and Resources; Chapter 27.44 RCW, Indian Graves and Records; Chapter 197-11
WAC, SEPA Rules.
8. Transportation
Impacts: The proposed project fronts upon S Grady Way and Williams Ave S culminating in the
intersection of the two (2) streets at the southwest portion of the project site. A Traffic Scoping
Memorandum authored by Spenser Haynie of Transportation Engineering NorthWest (TENW), dated
April 19, 2024 (Exhibit 12), was provided with the application. The analysis determined vehicular traffic
generated from the proposed development did not exceed 20 new vehicle trips per hour in either the
a.m. or the p.m. peak period with credit given due to the site being occupied by a business within the
last three (3) years prior to the application. Based on the calculations provided, the proposed
development would average a decrease of 133 new daily vehicle trips for dog daycare/boarding facility
versus Health/Fitness Club. Weekday peak hour a.m. trips would generate an increase of 13 new
vehicle trips, with six (6) vehicles leaving and seven (7) vehicles entering the site. Weekday peak hour
p.m. trips would generate a decrease of two (2) new vehicle trips, with a decrease of three (3) vehicles
entering and one (1) vehicle exiting the site. Per RMC 4-1-090G.4, Vacant Structures or Buildings,
“When an existing structure or building or portion thereof has been vacant for a period of three (3)
years or more, the impact fee shall be the applicable impact fee for the land use of the new category;
there shall not be a deduction of the impact fee that was or was previously paid for the land use
category of the prior use.” The impact fee will be reviewed at time of building permit application and
due to vacancy limits may not be subject to receiving credit as the previous use was abandoned
September 2021 (Exhibit 13). No frontage improvements are required as the project as proposed does
not meet the financial threshold.
The proposal has passed the City’s Traffic Concurrency Test (Exhibit 5) per RMC 4-6-070D, which based
upon a test of the citywide Transportation Plan, consideration of growth levels included in the LOS-test
Transportation Plan, and future payment of appropriate Transportation Impact Fees.
Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended.
Nexus: Not applicable.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 53E579AF-21BE-47B4-9BC7-CC82CA1C6943
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
Rainier Dog Resort and Spa
Staff Report to the Environmental Review Committee
LUA24-000093, SA-H, CU-H, ECF
Report of June 3, 2024 Page 9 of 9
SR_RainierDogERC_FINAL
9. Fire & Police
Impacts: Police and Fire Prevention staff reviewed the project but did not provide comments. As such,
it is expected that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development provided
the applicant constructs Code required improvements and pays associated impact fees.
Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation recommended.
Nexus: Not applicable.
E. Comments of Reviewing Departments
The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their
comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or “Advisory Notes to Applicant.”
✓ Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may be attached to this report.
The Environmental Determination decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within the 14 -day
appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680).
Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in
writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on June 17, 2024. Appeals must be submitted electronically to the City Clerk at
cityclerk@rentonwa.gov or delivered to City Hall 1st floor Lobby Hub Monday through Friday. The appeal fee,
normally due at the time an appeal is submitted, will be collected at a future date if your appeal is submitted
electronically. The appeal submitted in person may be paid on the first floor in our Finance Department. Appeals
to the Hearing Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and additional information regarding the appeal process
may be obtained from the City Clerk’s Office, cityclerk@rentonwa.gov.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 53E579AF-21BE-47B4-9BC7-CC82CA1C6943
CITY OF RENTON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
STAFF REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
EXHIBITS
Project Name:
Rainier Dog Resort and Spa
Land Use File Number:
LUA24-000093, SA-H, CU-H, ECF
Date of Meeting
June 3, 2024
Staff Contact
Andrew Van Gordon
Associate Planner
Project Contact/Applicant
Owen Keeper
LMA Architects
140 Lakeside Ave, Suite 310,
Seattle, WA 98122
Project Location
900 S Grady Way, Renton, WA
98057
The following exhibits are included with the ERC Report:
Exhibit 1: Environmental Review Committee (ERC) Report
Exhibit 2: Site Plan
Exhibit 3: Project Narrative
Exhibit 4: Rainier Dog Resort and Spa Property Line Noise Report prepared by Alan Burt, P.E. and Joshua
Wah-Blumberg of SSA acoustics dated April 30, 2024
Exhibit 5: Transportation Concurrency Memo dated May 14, 2024
Exhibit 6: Duwamish Letter dated March 18, 2024
Exhibit 7: Staff Response to Duwamish Tribe Comments dated April 4, 2024
Exhibit 8: Public Comment from Ms. Judy received March 28, 2024
Exhibit 9: Staff Response to Ms. Judy
Exhibit 10: Fence Detail
Exhibit 11: SEPA Environmental Checklist prepared January 25, 2024
Exhibit 12: Hydrogeologic Assessment prepared by Scott S. Riegel of Earth Solutions NW, LLC, dated
February 6, 2024
Exhibit 13: Rainier Dog Resort & Spa – Renton, WA Trip Generation Memo, prepared by Spenser Haynie
of Transportation Engineering NorthWest (TENW) dated April 19, 2024
Exhibit 14: Previous Tenant Lease
Exhibit 15: Exterior Elevations
Exhibit 16: Floor Plans
Exhibit 17: Advisory Notes
DocuSign Envelope ID: 53E579AF-21BE-47B4-9BC7-CC82CA1C6943