Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA 09-033_Talbot Ridge estates Early Start
® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 ,, ' Project No.: lo~pooc,, Inspector's Daily Report Activity No. : _ __,1.--o"""-""6"",L,,'.2~/ O'"""h"""'b"""--- Project Name: :T"At..-eor: 1<1c::<,-,& ~:=z Location: :::5£ ,q'Zt--JO ,f-/02,,.Jo AA,."'%;.. Developer/Contractor: C:::: '-1-FF-Y\/11.,,._IAM,:Z Date Signed REPORT Note: Each entry must be dated and signed . %sit£ MM P~-UJ,.__) 1-f-?......A-<? 0/~/h MM ~..-A/2.,.J:'-S 11fE_. 'b/r,1 ~ MAI\ r:2te:-?v I fi?6Ntlf?vJ6i? /...e:.o /?._ i9~ C),J -S0H-$ ---I /,, ~ - { ' ' A, /?,,-, ., --, I, -• .,._ --) ;,_ I~ TZJ,, , ,..,. Vp,vl.:r ,-~:;. " fA)()M,,4, -'?IL. -~7,p>~~ j\.A.J L.,C,, If ? I 'ft- . ~ \f'Jfr,C0~7 1y1~f~l'I -rz:,~ '0-,vt-. \)twUl ' S\Forms\Current Fonns\lnS·DaiU~m -01-16-2001 I soc ., Page I of I Meins, Mike From: Cliff [Cliff@belmonthomeswa.com] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 4:48 PM To: Kenneth Glasby Cc: Kayren Kittrick; Meins, Mike; joe@frontierconstructioninc.com Subject: Talbot Ridge Estates -Frontage Improvements SE 192nd St Ken: Thanks meeting with us today. Per our discussions, we propose to extend the frontage improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) to the PC point at Sta 11+03. 17. This will allow us to complete the sidewalk and curb ramps at the intersection and provide for about 52' of sidewalk along the tangent. At this location there will be a 4' fill at the curb. The face of curb is approximately 17' back of the existing edge of pavement. We plan to install the road grade for an additional 7' width from the face gutter to allow for access for the curb and gutter formation equipment. At the PC point the toe of slope (2:1) will be about 3' from the edge of pavement. We will install appropriate erosion control measures to protect the new roadway and slopes over the winter. Please advise if this is acceptable to the city. Thanks Cliff Williams Development Management Engineers, LLC 206 714-7161 10/31/2008 I -- !CH EXIST!~ "x · CENTERLIUE .• , ·, '· \ '. 'O AIA TCH EXISTING 7H OF CENTERLINE ", - CRAl£L SHOULDER IHTH 11/2" .· >, ,~ , 'ACING TOPCOURSE AND 2 1/2" ·· :--.;;:: ·' · <;HEO SURFACING BASE COURSE -· SAWCUT---. ...,. CB 16 LINE LOCATED AT STA. 13+50 TYPE! · . . I STA. 13+23.· 13. 7' R[ / l.. . (LOCATE 01£R EXIST.PIPE} . \ ( ( :__.-'vt REI.IOI£ £)(JS[ CB ANO £)(JS[ PIPE~ ' Yo BETHf:EN CB 15 ANO £)(JS[ CB, _:1 .Yit 1_' 'C,...C,/.,. I . SEE £)(JST7NG OR/VEWA Y---1 _, DETAIL 2, THIS SHE£[ . ; CB 15· TYPE I STA. 12+91, 15.59' RT. ~ ! l £\, . cB,4' :I --,--·--r ~ ·, I TYPE A ! 49•11 I STA. 1 +76, I 1s.2s· ,. 1 : I , ._ L SJ ( 'J• .,..._, t,;" W .~/d.8!j STA. 12+92. ENO EXTRUDED CURB ;_-_)' -All E)(JST!NC TREES SlfA'-L. 8£ RENOVEO BETHUNSfA. '.S' 11+36 ANO 1J+5J HflHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY ON NORTH SIDE OF SE 192ND S[ -·---------------· --- RAISE £XIS[ SSMH · TO El 401. 02 1 ·,H l CB BEC/N EXTRUDED CURB'--'-1--------------------------------..... _ 1(REPlJ\~E"WITH TYPE II, 48"91) ,, I 0 1. : Cf: if,'J :/,':,_jlJ (RAISE RIM TO 401.51,., 1·:1.; ,.:J--'.it, I w/SOLID COVER) \ (RAISE RIM TO 408.33 I ·1·;" ,-·r··r F 7 (J' r., ', ·1-/' .-,-,1-1,· r· -1,·-1 ·•,· . " r ,1. ·'···'· ~ , ........ ·-·· . ·' ., ,> i , 1~_;'' cr-FP W :;~L::, ::.: \i·./' ;r:T· \'.' 4·'.).:.·~_-.. 1 --r· --SEE msnNG omlf'WA r --· · · --·-··-· I DETAIL 1, !HIS SHE£[ I " I ' I !l::; ..-...... -.......... -.... 1--1·..i. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _; I ~ i;:j :::: ~ ~ ' ' ' '_ '_'!.! 11 1'1 1A -11 :_,. /C:· \ (LOWER RIM \ TO 410.53) \ I) '.',' ~~-:._: .. ·. ,.. ' ~I 'q: ~I ~ ~ ~~, "' ~ . 'j' I ~~~ ~~ l I . ..... .,, =ii: ~;5 ~ ~s:, .4+-4 , I "" «:: ci:. .,, es ~~ ;,; ~ <!; " .... " ~ S! "" ~ \ ; ;:'' L ./L:;_~.;· ' \ ~~_.! ~-1_1·1 c::, " ... \ i ~~I /1 ~ s:, \ ,.,,~ ·-t! I r. 'i I \i i ( . l·-, ', 95 Si \ ~\·· H .-~\-;,°'.,. 71 \ . '.1, / \ .,J!' I I' .-· II ~J/j\. A..:~'t \ ~--=9'/ ~/ \ -I . _ ~ N89'26'1s·w 1 1 ( l • 103.17 , : __ · 1 ', I . S. .lJ.92N~ST~~' ~ ' -C--... I ' . ~~ •• --I i ""l I.' ' ' ' . ~ (CTR. [) / f4.J5' T. / 1' ;JI,,, UT"°-v, en "1£/C."" , DC.<,//'/ -'.>Cl {CTR. .) }' CONCRETE RAJ.IP. 'AN!i/Tl, CURB 'S[ ~-TYPE,{ . ~ ~ , ~ , FROM 6" HIGH TO o• il!CH. CEM T ~ \ / \. STA. 1125, 21.72' ! "i "i , '"'i 1. \ CONCRETE SIOEWA TRANSi 'ON TO 'AU( ' . \. R[ (C ·-CR[) . i--T ---i:41 ASPHALT SH()(JLO. 'fTAIL 'EET C. 31 Q / '· · -_ "\ '<-Zi . _ I I I ', I ~ ,., So ~ l ~ , ~ 2q ~' . ~ ··r -, I ' 51::l u ' !lo 5l(5 ' "'to 1 <:::, . I "I-' '"'i O '"'i "f5 "'t-·' So I I I I !)) :~ ~ I i I · · l"'D 1 :r · · · . :VD/ :t.J:::: • TYPt if :,a•11 • • ·_ . • : Hf TH. $QL!O. cow • i : . . . . ·STA; ·12+'35. J(J.93'l'l: .... · ..... : ......... : .... . • MATCH EX!SllNG GRAPE . . . • i : :JJO; vc ... ! ..:..• ~: :_: ·c..:....;....:...:....:..,;_;...:__c...:...:....:...:...;...;..c...:....;...;....:...;_:_c..:...;...;..:....:...:...;....:...:...:....;...;..i..~c..:....;...;....:....:...:...J....; · · · • : • PVISTA. Tf+'oo: • : . . · i PIii £LEV; 410.54 · . . . j . . . . . . . ,· . 1 • ·, . . -. · , SSO= 280 .-hi,=2· · · ·:··1jj/i/_~;; 2BithtiJ'o /itit:' I : : : ROf!J VARIANCE tqSV0066} : • : • • . : !..i ... .. ~:: ·~~: : ~ "" • : 1§ ;, • ! ·soc'· Page I of I Meins, Mike From: Cliff [Cliff@belmonthomeswa.com) Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 4:48 PM To: Kenneth Glasby Cc: Kayren Kittrick; Meins. Mike; joe@frontierconstructioninc.com Subject: Talbot Ridge Estates -Frontage Improvements SE 192nd St Ken: Thanks meeting with us today. Per our discussions, we propose to extend the frontage improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) to the PC point at Sta 11 +03.17. This will allow us to complete the sidewalk and curb ramps at the intersection and provide for about 52' of sidewalk along the tangent At this location there will be a 4' fill at the curb. The face of curb is approximately 17' back of the existing edge of pavement. We plan to install the road grade for an additional 7' width from the face gutter to allow for access for the curb and gutter formation equipment. At the PC point the toe of slope (2:1) will be about 3' from the edge of pavement. We will install appropriate erosion control measures to protect the new roadway and slopes over the winter. Please advise if this is acceptable to the city. Thanks Cliff Williams Development Management Engineers, LLC 206 714-7161 10/31/2008 x . \ rJ AIA T(1I EX!SllNG 7H OF CENTERUNE ', ._ \ ' ' \ ' ' :;i\'Al£L SHOIJLOER IHTH 1 1/2" >. ,~ 'AONG TOPCOIJRSE ANO 2 1/2" ·· '-. ' 1 /' 'N .S/8.8!.i STA. 12+92. ENO EXTRUOEO CURB· -... ,,. :· , ·1 ALL EXISllNG TREES SlfAll-. BE ' ) RENOVED BDHfIN·sfA. '.S' 11+36 ' ANO 13+53 HflHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY • ON NORTH SIDE OF SE 192ND Sl · RAISE £)(JSl SSl,(H . . TO EL I01.02 l':Pf 1 CB BEGN £XTR(J11£0 CtJRB'--h r. ---·-·-·-···-·--··-·-· .-.. i(~EP~CE,.WITH TYPE II, 48",) \ I '~F.: er: ii' ,1 ),,5 . .;b (RAISE RIM TO 401.51,; 1·:1., .. ,:11.~:t, I w/SOLID COVER) \ (RAISE RIM TO 408.33 1·>" \··rrr, F ,or. c· 11''" .-~1 1••• ,. 1 ·1 .,.,. f .: , r .}.1.) .. )( •, f. · .. 1~!·,i• __ ,. L 'f_.., .;'D 1,.,i ·""r.-p "' ~qr: ·1, •,1-·_.I, -~T.:·r· ,,, 4··-. ·:-. LI ~,1·t O .; .. -.1 ... , ~·, •_, , H ·-···· .. l." -I --SEE EX!SllNG ORl~-y --. . ----- . DETAIL I, THIS SHEEl ''.NII 1·1, 1 . .. ... ·. , ,·I ·I :.1. 11., \ I " ', ' ' ' ~I 'q:: ~, ~ .,... 'jff£0 SIJRFACING BASE COURSE .' SAHWT-· ___, UN£ LOCATED AT STA. 1J+50 I R;: ; ~ ~ <:s " \,.i ~~ ~ :::~ ~~ "' ,;:, I<) ~ . ' ' (LOWER RIM \ TO 410.53) " ~ I \ i@ ~ ! l ~ CB 16 TYPE/ , . , I STA. 1J+2J, 13.7' Rl / .' . _ .... (LOCATE 01£1? EX!SlPIPE} . \ ( (· \ REMO'£ EX!Sl CB ANO £)(JSl PIPE~ BETHEEN CB 15 ANO EX/Sl CB, 1 . ~ i _) , ' , SEE £)(JST1NC OR/VEWA y_,,.-, OETAIL 2, THIS SHEET. . ; CB ts· TYPE! STA, 12+91, 15.59' RT. £\I . . CB'i5!14 · ·1J TYPE h ! 48"¢ I, STA, I +76. / ,s.2s· l I (CTR. l1/ .-.,1 ·) •/ ., I i~ ": ~<rl I -"1 ~ :::~ I . ....., V) >I:: ~ ::5 ~ ~ ,;:, ~I I Ir><.:~ Ir)~ ~ -'-.. ~~ V, ....., ::;? I : ~ I ' l·--., ---.·t (~,1-. \ I) W . .:SL:-.~ / . \ ·,t' L )).i?:-' \ , ... ,• -·1-"1 ~ •:~ . ::\ ·'· .I \ <;,·· H ·t1;,·;. ~ .. 1 \ .. . ..... , \ ' ' \ ... \~~, \ _11~ ~ \ ~Ir) ~ ,•I !' \ ' ', / /i\ ~191\. -I ··1~' / i ' \ 14.JS' l /, <;:) (CTR. .) ),\. • ··. ~ ~ ·"' I\ \ lg ' ~---. ---"'i "i ' ""5 i:41 ' i ":I'-I . I . ' . ,_ "" . I I I I ' ".':I-~-· .,..., ~ ,' ~ ~ I . I : \ ~ ~; ~ .. i5 ~ , ~ °' I '' I I ........ -. -...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I I tQ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION DEFICIENCY land Use Inspection Section Name of Development: Talbot Ridge Estates Project No.: LOSP0007 Address of Development: SE 192"d St & I02"d Ave SE. Activity No.: L08SI060 Developer: Contractor: Talbot Ridge Estates, LLC Frontier Construction, Inc. Attn.: Cliff Williams Attn.: Joe Hicks 11711 SE 81h St., #310 P.O. Box 7570 Bellevue, WA 98005 Covington, WA 98042 The following deficiencies have been observed on the site referenced above and must be completed prior to Final Construction Approval or further action may be taken. Remarks: Complete Plan Change No. I, L08PC065. Spill control required immediately upstream of vault. Access grate required on first cell of vault. Address erosion control issues as outlined in memo from Group Northwest, Inc. dated O 1/06/2009 and on-going erosion control issues. Date: January 7, 2009 Inspector: Mike Meins Cell Phone No.: 206.427.7318 Original: Developer Copy I: General Contractor Copy 2: Inspector S/LUIS/FORM/CURRENTFORM/CON·DEF.LUI.DOC 08-09-02 ~ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057·5212 IREIPORT Of CONSf;RUCTION IDEf ICIENCY land !Use lrospectio01 Section 206-296-6600 TIY 206·296-7217 www.metrokc.gov NameofDevelopment: ~ @06¢:L Address of Development: ~ 1q:2....J9 Sr: 4- l0,2..,.Jo A,11:-'SE- Developer: Contractor: Project No.: Los'pa?P7 Activity No.: loB!>1 04,,0 "Tll,._e.o, @rzt,,..a. .£'.:a,t'+Il=-5 ·Z....L<:...~_ ..... fuc...==NTJ""""'-=€:t?-=~..,,c.:,-0""~=o.1----, 'P.O. 13oX "7S7o l 17 l t s.E._ B7}±: $r. #310 The following deficiencies have been observed on the site referenced above and must be c,ampleted by A,Ap or further action may be taken. Remarks: Aootno,-JA-t-MA~At-/2 Pequ,~ '1U ~P.t.-12s£. ~It.-$ J,-..J 4o.o I :r:,o,.,_J 7P H:-:;tt??Q$GG-?J ,__)6. • Inspector: A.A,,~ /l.f,&,...;7 /1-/'1-0'i?' Phone No.: -UZ:.1 4-?-7 ,7~/6 Original: Developer S/LUIS/FORM/CURRENTFORM/CON-DEF.LUl.DOC 011-09-02 Copy I: General Contractor Copy 2: Inspector soc Page I of I Meins, Mike From: Ryan Anderson [ryan@kosnik.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 10:52 AM To: Matt Cc: Meins, Mike Subject: RE: Talbot Ridge Matt, It is our opinion that the small leaks which appeared along the west wall and west portion of the north wall will not affect the structural integrity of the vault. It is our understanding that all leaks as well as potential future leak locations have been sealed with the Burke Plug product. Ryan Anderson Kosnili. Engineering, PC Site Structures 10511 19m A VE SE I EVERETT I WA 198208 Tel: 425-357-9600 I Fax: 425-357-9622 ryan@:)kosnik.com I www.kosnik.com From: Matt [mailto:mattapeland@msn.com] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 3:54 PM To: Ryan Anderson Cc: mike.meins@kingcounty.gov Subject: Talbot Ridge Ryan, There was an issue with some water leaking on the Talbot ridge vault. We have located and patched the leaks using Burk plug. (Product specs attached) There was a concern from the county as to the structural integrity of the vault due to the leaks. Matt Apeland (mobile 253-508-4675) AC!-Concrete Construction 12611 SE 232nd Street Kent, WA. 98031 Office 253-638-7429 Fax 253-630-2938 12/02/2008 Burke Plug Description A durable, resistant, hydraulic cement formulated specifically for preventing water seepage through concrete or masonry walls and floors. When subject to water pressure, Burke Plug becomes hard and more resistant. Burke Plug sets in throe to five minutes depending upon the temc peraturo of the mixing water. It will not shrink or oxidize. Burke Plug will last the life of the structure. Manufacturer Edoco 4226 Kansas Ave. Kansas City, KS 66106 (877) 416-3439 Long Beach (888) 287-5387 Use Use on cracks and holes in concrete or masonry surfaces where water running or seepage is occurring. Ideal for basements, tunnels, pipes, elevator pits and sewers. Grouts and seals around pipes, conduits and bolts. Use Burke Plug to patch tie-holes or other faults in concrete walls. Benefits Architectural Specifications Hydraulic Repair Cement: A fast setting, non-shrink, water resistant cement shall be used on all cracks, holes and around pipes and bolts where water penetration is occurring. Approved product: Burke Plug or approved equivalent. Application Coverage/yield: 50 lbs., approximately 1020 cubic inches (.44 ft.1). Cut out cracks a ·minimum of 3/4"(1.9 cm) wide and deep. Cut back or square off. DO NOT use V cuts. Flush away all loose and foreign material. For holes, honeycomb, tie holes, etc., remove all steel, wood and loose material. Cut back to a minimum depth of l "(2.5 cm) under cut if possible. Mix with clean water. Use just enough water to produce a putty consistency. Mix only enough that can be used in one minute. Place by forcing into crack or hole with maximum pressure. DO NOT trowel over surface. Keep damp for fifteen minutes. For stopping running water through concrete or masonry, cut out cracks or holes to a minimum depth and width of 3/4"(1.9 cm). Under cut if possible. Start at top and force material into cracks. At the area of greatest pressure, DO NOT place immediately, hold in hand or trowel until it becomes slightly warm and setting is occurring. Then place firmly in cracks and hold in place until material is set. For sealing cracks at the junction of the floor and wall, cut back a minimum of 3/4"(1.9 cm). Force material into crack with rounded tool and smooth out to fonn a cove. Mixing: At 70'F(2I.I 0 C), mix both material and water. Material will set in three to five minutes. • Sets in two to three minutes to stop running water immediately o Non-shrink; locks into place I --' --,--------------------~-- 1 TEST DATA o Sets under water; just hold in place until set • Durable; will last the life of the structure • Anchors, bolts, rails and other fixtures Compressive Strength (ASTM C-109) I day 28 days Tensile (ASTM C-190) 28 days 4200 psi (28.9 MPa) 6800 psi ( 46.9 MPa) 700 psi (4.8 MPa) ~~~~IQ}' ------------- CDN5TRUCTIQN CHEMICALS Setting times will be shorter when the temperature increases and the opposite when the temperature decreases. Packaging 50 lb. pail (5 gal. pail)(27.2 Kg) Limitations/Precautions Do not place at temperatures below 40°F(5°C) or if the temperature is expected to fall below 40°F(5°C) in the next twenty-four hour period. DO NOT mix with water over I00°F(37.8°C). DO NOT over mix. DO NOT retemper. Finish with steel or rubber float. Contains Portland Cement and sand. Cement will cause irritation. A void contact. Use ofa dust respirator, safety goggles and rubber gloves are recom- mended. Avoid prolonged contact with clothing. In case of contact with eyes, immediately flush with water for at least 15 minutes. Get prompt medical attention. DO NOT wear contact lenses when working with this product. DO NOT take internally. Keep out of reach of children. A void hazards by following all precau- tions found in the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS), product labels and technical literature. Please read this information prior to using the product. Warranty Edoco warrants, for 12 months from the date of manufacture or for the duration of the published product she I flife, whichever is less, that at the time of shipment by Edoco, the product is free of manufacturing defects and con forms to Edoco' s pub I ished specifications in force on the date of acceptance by Edocooftheorder. Edocoshall only be liable under this warranty i fthe material has been applied, used, and stored in accordance with &loco's instructions in this technical data sheet. The purchaser must examine the product when received and promptly notify Edoco in writing of any non-conformity before the product is used, or no laler than 30 days after such non- conformity is first discovered. IfEdoco, in its sole discretion, determines that the product breached the above warranty, it wil I, in its sole discretion, rep] ace the non-conforming product, refund the purchase price or issue a credit in the amountofthepurchaseprice. This is the sole and exclusive remedy for breach of this warranty. Only an Edocoofficer is authorized to modify this warranty. The sales information on the Edoco website and received by the customer during the sales process does not supersede this warranty and the specifications oft he product in force on the date of sale. THE FOREGOING WARRANTYSHALLBEEXCLUSIVEANDIN LIEUOF ANY OTHER WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT ABILITY AND FITNESS FORA PARTICULAR PURPOSE ANDALLOTHERWARRANTIESOTHER- WISEARISINGBYOPERATIONOFLAW, COURSE OF DEALING, CUSTOM, TRADE OR OTHERWISE. Lim i talion of Liability Edoco shal I not be I iabte in contract or in lort (including, without limitation, negligence, strict liability or otherwise) for loss of sales, revenues or profits; cost of capital or funds; business interruption or cost of downtime, loss of use, damage to or loss of use of other property (real or personal); failure to realize expected savings; frustration of economic or business expectations; claims by third parties ( other than for bodily injury), or economic losses of any kind; or for any special, incidental, indirect, consequential, punitiveorexemplary damages arising in any way out oft he performance of, or failure to perform, this Agreement, even ifEdoco could foresee or has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The Parties expressly agree that these limitations on damages areallocations of risk constituting, in part, the consideration for this agreement, and also that such limitations shall survivethedetenninationofany court of competentjurisdiction that any remedy provided in these terms oravailab\e at law fails of its essential purpose. Receiving All bagged products should be checked for dryness prior to signing shipping papers. Storage Burke Plug should be stored in a cool, dry interior area. At no time should material be exposed to high moisture, rain or snow conditions. Technical Services Complete technical and specification services are available from the manufac- turer and their authorized representa· tives and distributors. Filing System Additional literature and the Material Safety Data Sheet can be obtained from Edoco upon request. -------~~~{QJ' _____ _-=c00200=20000, CDNSi~UCTICN CHElNIICAL5 -~ 'i ' Collection of Aulland Molded Gratings A Brief Introduction Fiberglass Reinforced Plaslic(FRP) Is a plank shaped material cured in the matrix of unsaturated resins including isophthalic, orthorphthalic, vinyl ester and phenolic, with reinforced frame of fiberglass roving through a special production process, with a certain rate of open meshes. Structure of Aulland Molded Gratings Aulland Molded Gratings are woven with fiberglass roving, and then cured in one piece in a whole mould. 1. Fully impregnalion of resin wilh interwoven structure ensures great corrosion resistance. 2. The whole structure helps even distribution of load and contributes to installation and mechanical properties of the supporting construction. 3. The lustrous surface and sliding surface helps self.clean advantage. 4. The concave surface ensures a good anti·slippery function and gritted surface even much better. Properties of Aulland Molded gratings 1. Anti.corrosion against different kinds of chemical medium and neveMusty properties bring about long service time and free of maintenance. Aulland molded gratings with non-metallic material property, different from the traditional metal gratings, never get rusty in different chemical media from electrical corrosion, and prevent the material structure from being damaged, with no need to do any inspection or maintenance, which never lead to the interruption of production and free from any unpredicted accidents like metal gratings of many potential dangers. At the same time Aulland Molded gratings will not get rotten or moldy like wooden materials, and will act as upgraded generation to replace materials like iron, wood and cement. 2. Flame Retardant Au!land Molded gratings, with specially designed curing system, can meet the demand of projects for fire·resistance, and ensure the safety. Aulland Molded gratings have passed the test Of ASTM E-84 for the fire retardant property. 3. Aulland Molded gratings have the advantage of anti-conduct of electricity, fire prevention and non·magnetlc properties. 4. The elasticlty of Aulland molded gratings can reduce the fatigue from the working staff and contribute to comfort and efficiency. 5. Aulland Molded gratings are light, strong and easy to cut for installation. The composition of resin and fiberglass, with low mass density, only one quarter of iron, two thirds of aluminum, has comparatively higher strength. The low self-weight can greatly reduce the supporting basic and accordingly cut the engineering material cost, The convenience for cutting and no need for big hoisting equipment also contribute to the decrease of installation cost with only little labor force and electric tools. 6. Aulland molded gratings have constancy in exterior and interior color, with options as well to customize the production environments according to clients' requirements. 7. Aulland Molded gratings bring about better compound economic benefits. 8. Aulland Molded gratings adapt easily to flexible designs according to customers' diversity of sizes, while maintaining the size exactness. Aulland Molded gratings can be customized according to different meshes, different board sizes and different loading. requirements. The cutting cost can also be cut by reducing to minimum of the spoilage:, satisfying greatly the demand from the customers. OOSl~~ll . AULLAND Molded Grating Details (Imperial) AULLAND 3/4"x3/4" Mini Mesh Panel thickness Bar thickness Open Rate Standard panel sizes Wt/Sq. ft (Top/Bottom) 1" 0.25"/0.2" 42% 4'x13', 4'x12', 4'X8', 3.441bs 3'<10' 1-112" 0.28"/0.2" 42% 4'<13'.4'<12', 4'<8', 4.81 lbs 3'<10' 1-112"P 0.28"/0.2" 42% 5'x 13', 4'< 13', 4'<12', 4. 381bs 4'<8', 3'<10' P means phenolic AULLAND 1.5"><1.5" Square Mesh Panel thickness Bar thickness Open Rate Standard panel sizes Wt./Sq. ft (Top/Bottom) 112" 0.23"/0.2" 87% 4 'x 13 ',4'x 12',4'x8',3'x1Q' 1.231bs 1' 0.25"10.2" 68% 4'<13', 4'<12', 4'x8', 3'x10' 2.521bs 1-114" 0.25"10.2" 68% 4'><13', 4'x12', 4'x8', 3'x10' 3.00lbs 1-114'H 0.42"10.35" 58% 4'>C13', 4'><12', 4'x8', 3'x1Q' 5.111bs 1-112' 0.28"/0.2" 68% 4'x13', 4'<12', 4'x8', 3'<10' 3.991bs 5•,10·. 5'<13' 2"H 0.43"10.35" 56% 4'x13', 4'x12', 4'x8', 3'x10' 8. 60lbs 2-215"H 0.45"10.35" 54% 4'x13', 4'><12', 4'><8', 3'><10' 10.321bs 1-112"P 0.28"/0.2" 68% 4'><13', 4'x12', 4'><8', 3. 60lbs 3'<10', 5'<13' P means phenolic · H means heavy duty ............ , ..... 2"><2" Square Mesh Panel thickness Bar thickness Standard panel sizes (Top/Bottom) 112" 0.28"/0.2" 82% 4'><12', 4'x8', 3'><10' 1" 0.30"/0.24" 80% 4'x12', 4'x8', 3'><10' 2.401bs 2" 0.31"/0.24" 71 % ,4'x12't-l I 0'1 4A[ 4.811bs 2"P 0.32"10.24" 71 % 4'<13',4'<12', 4'<8',3'<10' 4.331bs P means phenolic AULLAND 1~1/2"x6" Rectangular Mesh Panel thickness Bar thickness Open Rate Standard panel sizes (Top/Bottom) Wt./Sq. ft 1-112" 0.31"/0.24" 67% 4'x12', 4'x8', 3'x1D' 3. 381bs Uniform Load Table-12' 'Wide Strip of Grating Deflection in Inches ~ LOAD IN LBS/SOUARE FOOT SPAN IN INCHES STYLE 50 10D 200 300 400 500 750 1" xl-1/2" SM ... ... ... ... .. . ... ... 1-1/2" xl-1/2" SM 0.01 0. 012 0.015 0.018 0.022 0.025 0.033 2" 1(2" SM 0.01 0.011 0.013 0. 015 0. 017 0.019 0.029 1"x1"1(4"RMS 0.011 0.015 0. 021 0.028 0.034 0. 041 ... 12 1" xl" x4" RMH 0.013 0. 016 0. 021 0.027 0.032 0.038 ... 1-1/2" xJ/4" Mini 0. 017 0.033 0.066 0.099 0. 132 ... 1-1/5" l(Q. 79" Mini ... ... ... ... ... ... . .. 1-1/2"x1-1/2 "x6 11 RM D.D03 0.006 0.013 0.019 ... 0.031 ... 1" xl-1/2 11 SM D.044 0.083 0. 163 0. 243 0.322 0.402 0. 6D1 1-1/2" 11-1/2" SM D. 017 0.032 0. 061 D. 091 0. 121 D. 151 0.226 2 11 1(2" SM 0.015 0.023 0.038 0.054 0.069 0.084 0. 162 24 1" x1'' x4" RMS 0. 036 0.073 0. 145 0. 218 0.291 0. 363 ... 1" xl". 1(4" RMH 0. 039 0.072 0. 138 0. 203 0.269 0. 335 ... 1-1/2" x3/4" Mini 0.042 0.084 0. 167 D. 251 0. 334 ... . .. 1-1/5 11 xO. 79" Mini ... 0.053 0.099 ... ... ... . .. 1-1 /2 11x 1-1/2 "x6 "RM 0. 019 0.038 0.075 0. 113 ... 0. 188 . .. 1" xl-1/2" SM 0. 218 0.44 0.885 ... ... . .. ... 1-1/2" xl-1/2" SM 0.067 0. 136 0.274 0. 412 0.55 0. 688 ... 2" x2 11 SM 0.047 0.083 0. 155 0. 227 0. 299 0. 372 0. 732 36 1 '' xl 11 x4 11 RMS 0. 143 0.26 0.495 0. 73 0.964 ... ... 1" x1" x4" RMH 0. 101 0.209 0.426 0.643 0. 861 ... ... 1-1/2" x3/4" Mini 0. 105 0. 211 0. 421 0. 631 ... ... ... 1-1/5" xO. 79" Mini ... 0.22 0.42 ... . .. ... ... 1-1/2 11x t-1 /2 "x6 uRM 0. 071 0. 143 0. 285 0. 428 ... ... . .. 1" xl-1/2" SM ... ... . .. . .. . .. . .. ... 1-1/2" xl-1/2" SM 0. 235 0. 965 ... ... ... ... -2" x2" SM 0.095 0. 194 JI). 392 0. 589 0. 787 ., ... ... 1" xl" x4" RMS ... ....... q ... .. . ... ... ... 1 11 xl'.' x4" RMH ... ... . .. ... . .. . .. ... 48 1-1/2" x3/4" Mini 0. 247 0. 494 ... ... . .. ... ... 1-1/5" xO. 79" Mini ... 0. 7 ... ... . .. ... ... 0 1-1 /2 "x1-1/2 "x6 "RM 0. 208 0. 411 ... ... ... ... . .. 1. RM=Rectangular Mesh 2. Minl=Mini Mesh Remarks: 3. SM=Square Mesh 4. RMS=Reclangular Mesh Standard 5. RMH=Reclangular Mesh Heavy duly 1000 ... ... ... 0.075 0.065 0. 333 ... 0. 061 ... ... ... 0. 727 0. 664 . .. ... 0.372 ... ... ... ... .. . . .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... i I i I I I I I I I i l ·[ ,. /! i I· ! ' l_ Application of Aulland Molded Gratings Industries: Chemical plant and me.tal finishing; Construction engiiieerlng, traffic and transportation; Petrochemical engineering, ocean survey, water engineering; Food and beverage plants; Textile printing and dyeing and electronic industry. Functions: Anti-slippery floor, stair tread, foot bridge; Operation platform, trench cover; Off-shore oil rig, moor shipyard, shipping deck, ceiling; Security and safety fence, handrail; Ramp ladder, scaffold, railway footpath; Decorative grid, man-made fountain pool grid. Advantage: Anti-corrosion and anti-aging; Light but strong impact strength; · Long service life and maintenance free; Non-conduction or magnetic; Easy Installation and rich colors. Resin System Resin Type Resin Description Base VEFR-25 Vinyl Superior Corrosion Ester Resistance and Fire Retardant VEFR-10 Vinyl Superior Corrosion Resistance Ester and Enhanced Fire Retardant IFR-25 lsophthalic Industrial Grade Corrosion Polvester Resistance and Fire Retardant IFR-10 lsophthalic Industrial Grade Corrosion Polyester Resistance and Extra Fire Retardant IFGR-30 lsophthalic FoodGradeCorrosion Resistance Polyester and Fire Retardant OFR-25 Ortho Moderate Corrosion Resistance and Fire Retardant MP-5 Phenolic Low Smoke and Superior resin Fire Resistance 0-CR Ortho Moderate Corrosion Resistance Corrosion Resistance Excellent Excellent Very Good Very Good Very Good Moderate Very Good Moderate Flame Spread Ralina ASTM E84 Class 1, 25 or less Class 1 10 or less Class 1, 25 or less Class 1 10 or less Class 1 30 or less Class 1 25 or less Class 1 5 or less No Colors Available Dark Gray.Orange Dark Gray ~ Dark Gray, Custom Light Gray, Light Green Green, Yellow Light Gray.Dark Gray Roodish-Brown,l'lleoo, painfi'11 ol 11' graling can bepeJfDm'rf!d to obtain agrayo, red failsh Green, Yellow Light Gray, Dark Gray r f i : i 1.' l ,' ! • Activity: jL05P0007 Status: IPRELAPPR Date: 103/24/2005 " ,(i1ll;\i] Location: !TALBOT RIDGE ESTATES NW 05-22-05 APPLICANL jTALBOT RIDGE ESTATES LLC Addreu,:111711 SE 8TH ST 1310 Address J: jBELLEVUE WA EMait Dal~: ~1n-7-/(_J3_/2_ .. 0-0~0 N.2tetion: iii'i l ...... i I BKk§top r Relationship Phone 1 OWNER POA 253-852-31115 POA z;,d 9aoos Phone 2, License: ProjectName: ________________ ProjectNo. Site Address: Inspect Activity No. D o 1/i!l 41 (: lru 1.:1 .~. • .l · ti.. · -,,,, :=; O t:v . Sec 1 1/1 At 3.9" Ln 25 Col 1 ;·~re mi·. D'.1 ~)'.,;, 0 §ici'. 1 "i:r"ii~ 0 iii· ~,. i:~iZ:i, -~;;;f'i .. !5:,:ii, ~;;:;0;;;:.,,;;;~::; .•. ,..;:c.::· ·:',· "'""·;"'i· iilii Thursday, Nov 06, 2008 01:10 PM ,., Trust No 206-431 -0953 No I No P1iMty Name: Ix' r,ust Account.s s.ok§top r o:J'• · · 1 ·I /jdd Now Qelete fielresh 0 Back .IJI:. E"' ,· ' ' I. , I ' ,, i ' <f:~[E ~DESIGN October 2, 2008 Core Project No. 04120 Mike Meins King County Inspection 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055 LAND USE INSPECTION OCT 16 2008 RECEIVED Subject: Talbot Ridge Estates, As-Built Vault Verification Project Number L05P0007 Dear Mr. Meins: Core Design, Inc. 14711 N.E.29/hP/ace,Su;te 101 Bellevue, Washington 98007 425.885.7877 Fax425.885.7963 www.coredesigninc.com We have surveyed the vault at Talbot Ridge Estates to confirm that it provides the required live and dead storage for water quality and detention. The length of the vault was designed to be 92 feet long, but it was constructed to 92.30' in all cells. The cells were designed to 25', 20', and 19' south to north and were constructed to 25.03', 19.98', and 18.99'. This provides an overall larger footprint than design. The design footprint was 5888 SF and the as-built footprint is 5907.2 SF. The ceiling was built slightly higher at (0.05') and the outflow was constructed lower (0.18') creating a larger than designed detention volume as seen below. Due to the outfall being slightly lower and the wet vault floor being higher (0.02') the depth of the average I foot sediment storage has been raised to 353.06 (.06' higher). This decrease in dead storage in cell one was compensated by and increase in storage in the second cell. To obtain an average of 6" of sediment storage in the second cell, the top of the sediment storage was dropped to 352.56. This increased the depth in the second cell than compensated for the loss of dead storage in the first cell as seen in the table below. Wetvault Detention vault Reauired 13,852 58,232 Desi,med 13,855 58,232 As-Built 14,2,16 59,899 If there is any more information you will need, please don't hesitate to call me at (425) 885-7877. Sincerely, CORE DESIGN, INC. Robert H. Stevens P.E. Principal / Senior Engineer cc Cliff Williams, Vineyards Construction ENGINEERING PLANNING · SURVEYING <eoi!E ~DESIGN October 2, 2008 Core Project No. 04120 MikeMeins King County Inspection 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055 Core Design, Inc. 14711 N.E. 291hPlace, Suile 101 Bellevue, Washington 98007 425.885.7877 Fax425.885.7963 www.coredesigninc.com Subject: Talbot Ridge Estates, As-Built Vault Verification Project Number L05P0007 Dear Mr. Melns: We have surveyed the vault at Talbot Ridge Estates to confinn that it provides the required live and dead storage for water quality and detention. The length of the vault was designed to be 92 feet long, but it was constructed to 92.30' in all cells. The cells were designed to 25', 20', and 19' south to north and were constructed to 25.03', 19.98', and 18.99'. This provides an overall larger footprint than design. The design footprint was 5888 SF and the as-built footprint is 5907.2 SF. The ceiling was built slightly higher at (0.05') and the outflow was constructed lower (0.18') creating a larger than designed detention volume as seen below. Due to the outfall being slightly lower and the wet vault floor being higher (0.02') the depth of the average I foot sediment storage has been raised to 353.06 (.06' higher). This decrease in dead storage in cell one was compensated by and increase in storage in the second cell. To obtain an average of 6" of sediment storage in the second cell, the top of the sediment storage was dropped to 352.56. This increased the depth in the second cell than compensated for the loss of dead storage in the first cell as seen in the table below. Wetvault Detention vault Required 13,852 58,232 Desi~ned 13.855 58,232 As-Built 14,246 59.899 If there is any more information you will need, please don't hesitate to call me at (425) 885-7877. Sincerely, CORE DESIGN, INC. 12#J&- Robert H. Stevens P.E. Principal/ Senior Engineer cc Cliff Williams, Vineyards Construction ENGINEERING · PLANNING . SURVEYING ( ~1 11 l ! I II!! ~m iii! R 111 i ~ i~ ii! ' 15 i '•1 ! ~ i:: ... I !I ~ ~ '!' ,. !!! I !,' " .,1 " 1' ~ ! II 'II ,1 11 l 1 ' ' ii t; :1, pi, ii I• I ' 1, Ii!,•' ll ' 'i P#4272H '"TES ocso,,:o. aJ """"'r( --! STORMDRA/NAGEDE:TA/LSANDNv ,,,. ••= CORE ,.,,. ___ ,,, .- NO O•TE I •t~SION ~ !. ~ ; i "i _:-- ' ' ' ·-----,-- i :KoQ i '--'<5'<-..r' ""-'---"""~1-l-1' -' ( ... ,q:3 ---""._,_'::::.a·,' -·+-~,·----l+O• ~·-· "':--- "i--+---,__-(~~ -:-----+ ' P#4272G ~ I I § ! i. ... II~ _, g t;;i, !:::i . ,, "' £. STORM DRAINAGE VAULT DETAILS TALBOT RIDGE ESTA TES .. """'''"'°'"""°'~S'™"'iU ~llUIGH .,,..,,,,,,,...,..,,,... Im t = tHCIJHffl"'" • "UNPNO • ,u,vf,rNO e on r NOi e,~ ,s ON( INCH Homes, Inc. 1(//?f(U.M\ ir, NOi °'o,".:':'.~"" __ L__,,, ==.c··--'----------'- ~ ~ i ' I ~:I ,·:- '' • I •• I '· • :1 I i 11 I ' ~ ~ )ii ~ ·-:-s •\' ' ~ .. ' . I , ' 1111 '' 1 ' l1! ' \ : ' ' ! ! 11 1 ' . ' I I '!I . ! :1 . ' ,, " '• (\ !• ,• ,: :! ' ' I I ' I l' ' •. I ' ' :l i~{ Ii ' !I ,, ' ' ,, l ' !I '-i \~ ' ' ' ! • " ' " :1) ·, ., 'I :,· ' !1 ;, \ ·, (',' I ' I ' .,, '' ~: '' '' :? \I ,, ' ~i i i\ ;', "' 11/ tQr~·I : ~ ' : • J ~ • ~ • i : ,-• HO. O>l'E " " I ~ -~ STRUCTURES I A Division of Kosnik Engineerin~r. PC December 9, 2008 Mr. Mike Meins Engineer II, Land Use Inspections King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-5212 Ref: Talbot Ridge Estates Dear Mike: It is our opinion that the small leaks which appeared along the west wall and western· portion of the north wall will not affect the structural integrity of the vault. It is our understanding that all leaks as well as potential future leak locations have been sealed with the Burke Plug product. We trust this information adequately addresses your needs. If you should have any questions, or require additional information, please give us a call. Sincerely, Daniel Kosnik, PE President 1051119TH Ave SE, Suite C, Everett, WA 98208 <> (425) 357-9600 (phone)<> (425) 357-9622 (fax) soc Meins, Mike From: Ryan Anderson [ryan@kosnik.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 7:31 AM To: Meins, Mike Cc: Matt Subject: RE: Talbot Ridge Mike, Attached is the stamped and signed letter you requested. Thanks, Ryan Anderson Kosnik Engineering, PC Site Structures 10511 19TH AVE SE I EVERETT I WA I 98208 Tel: 425-357-9600 I Fax: 425-357-9622 ryan@.Jkosnik.com I www.kosnik.com From: Meins, Mike [mailto:Mike.Meins@kingcounty.gov] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 8:58 AM To: Ryan Anderson Cc: Matt Subject: RE: Talbot Ridge Page 1 of2 Ryan- I had our structural engineer review your comments on the vault repair. He is accepting your explanation, but has asked that you submit this in letter form with your PE stamp and signature. This will satisfy any concerns we have on the vault. Thanks, Mike Meins f;ng_ineer II, Land Use Inspections King County Oepartlnent of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton WA 98055·5212 Office: 206.296.66781 Cell: 206.427.7318 mike.meins@kingcounty.gov ·-----·----· From: Ryan Anderson [mailto:ryan@kosnik.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 10:52 AM To: Matt Cc: Meins, Mike Subject: RE: Talbot Ridge Matt, It is our opinion that the small leaks which appeared along the west wall and west portion of the north wall will not affect the structural integrity of the vault. It is our understanding that all leaks as well as potential future leak locations have been sealed with the Burke Plug product. 12/09/2008 soc Ryan Anderson Kosnik Engineering, PC Site Structures · 10511 19TH AVE SE I EVERETT I WA I 98208 Tel: 425-357-9600 I Fax: 425-357-9622 ryan@kosnik.com I www.kosnik.com From: Matt [mailto:mattapeland@msn.com] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 3:54 PM To: Ryan Anderson Cc: mike.meins@kingcounty.gov Subject: Talbot Ridge Ryan, Page 2 of2 There was an issue with some water leaking on the Talbot ridge vault. We have located and patched the leaks using Burk plug. (Product specs attached) There was a concern from the county as to the structural integrity of the vault due to the leaks. Matt Apeland (mobile 253-508-4675) AC!-Concrete Construction 12611 SE 232nd Street Kent, WA. 9803 I Office 253-638-7429 Fax 253-630-2938 12/09/2008 .. Pra , Jeff From: Sent: To: Subject: Mike, Pray, Jeff Thursday, November 06, 2008 12:25 PM Meins, Mike Talbot Ridge drainage deficiencies It's come to my attention that the drainage system design for Talbot Ridge is missing a couple of required elements: Spill control is required immediately upstream of the vault (KCSWDM 4.2.1, p.4.13). A solution would be to replace CB3 with a 54" Type II and add a spill control T. The separator wall in the first cell of the vault prompts a requirement for a 5x10 grate ahead of the wall in the first cell (KCSWDM 6.4.2.2 p.6-84, see para.2). These elements are probably already constructed. The applicant has the option to revise the design under an approved plan change and correct the construction, or apply for an adjustment to the drainage manual {which is simply another way to satisfy design requirements under a design plan change). In either case, a design plan change is required. Please issue one asap. Thanks, Jeff 1 • 4 . PIPE SYSTEMS -DESIGN CRITERIA Pipe Anchors Table 4.2.1.A (p. 4-9) presents the requirements, by pipe material, for anchoring pipe systems. Figure 4.2.1.B (p. 4-15) and Figure 4.2.1.C (p. 4-16) show typical details of pipe anchors. Spill Control Spill control is required for projects constructing or replacing onsite pipe systems that receive runoff from pollution-generating surfaces such as roads or parking lots. Spill control measures are intended to temporarily detain oil or other floatable pollutants and prevent them from entering the downstream conveyance system, water quality facility, or flow control facility in the event of an accidental spill or · dumping. Allowable options for providing spill control include the following: tee section in one of the lowest manholes or catch basins in the system (see Figure 5.3.4.A) An API or coalescing plate oil/water separator c) A tee section in a wet vault, or detention tank or vault (provided water quality facilities are downstream of the detention tank or vault) d) An active spill control plan. To use this option, the spill control plan and summary of an existing or proposed training schedule must be submitted as part of the drainage review submittal. At a minimum, such plans must include the following: • Instructions for isolating the site to prevent spills from moving downstream (shutoff valves, blocking catch basins, etc.) • Onsite location of spill clean-up materials • Phone numbers to call for emergency response • Phone numbers of company officials to notify • Special safety precautions, if applicable. Debris Barriers Debris barriers (trash racks) are required on all pipes 18 to 36 inches in diameter entering a closed pipe system. Debris barriers shall have a bar spacing of 6 inches. See Figure 4.2.1.D (p. 4-17) for required debris barriers on pipe ends outside of roadways. See Figure 4.2.1.E (p. 4-18) and Section 4.3 (p. 4-37) for requirements on pipe ends (culverts) projecting from driveway or roadway side slopes. Outfalls Outfalls shall be designed as detailed in Section 4.2.2 (p. 4-29). Other Details In addition to the details shown in Figure 4.2.1.A (p. 4-14) through Figure 4.2.1.E (p. 4-18), Standard Construction Details are available in the King County Road Standards and APWAIWSDOT Standard Plans for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction. Commonly used details include field tapping of concrete pipe, catch basins and catch basin details, manholes and manhole details, curb inlets, frames, grates, and covers. 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 4-13 1/24/2005 SECTION 4.2 PIPES, OUTFALLS, .A "'-pUMPS ------------------------ FIGURE 4.2.1.A PIPE COMPACTION DESIGNS AND BACKFILL limits of pipe compaction 1 '-0" A. Metal and Concrete Pipe B. Pipe -Arch Installation Rigid Pipe NOTES: 1. Pipe compaction limits shown on this plan are for pipe construction in an embankment. For pipe construction In a trench, the horizontal limits of the pipe compaction zone shall be the walls of the trench. 2. All steel and aluminum pipe and pipe-arches shall be Installed In accordance with design A. 3. Concrete pipe with elliptical reinforcement shall be Installed In accordance with design A. 4. Concrete pipe, plain or with circular reinforcement, shall be installed with design A. 5. O.D. Is equal to the outside diameter of a pipe or the outside span of pipe-arch. The dimensions shown as O.D. with 3' maximum shall be 0.D. until 0.D. equals 3'. at which point 3' shall be used. * 1' -0" for diameters 12" through 42" and spans through 50". 2' -0" for diameters greater than 42" and spans greater than 50". l/24/2005 4-14 foundation level * A = 4" min., 27" I.D. and under 6" min., over 27" I.D. Bedding for Flexible Pipe Flexible Pipe NOTES: 1. Provide uniform support under barrels. 2. Hand tamp under haunches. 3. Compact bedding material to 95% max. density; directly over pipe, hand tamp only. 4. See "Excavation and Preparation of Trench" in sanitary sewers section of the standard WSDOT/APWA specifications for trench width "W" and trenching options. The pipe zone will be the actual trench width. The minimum concrete width shall be 11/2 I.D. + 18". 5. Trench backfill shall conform to "Backfilling Sewer Trenches" in the sanitary sewers section of the WSDOT/APWA standard specifications, except that rocks or lumps larger than 1" ear foot of pipe diameter shall not be used In the backfill material. 6. See "Bedding Material for Flexible Pipe" In aggregates section of the WSDOT/APWA stand<l'(l specification for the material specifications. · ~ Backfill material placed in 0.5' loose layers and compacted to 95% maximum density. ~ Method B or C compaction (WSDOT/APWA standard specifications.) Min.dist. Pipe Size· between barrels circular pipe 12" to 24" 12" cone., LCPE, CMP 30" to 96" diam.+2 (diameter) 102"to 180" 48" pipe -arch 18"to 36" 12" metal only 43" to 142" span.+3 (span) 148" to 199" 48" 2005 Surface Water Design Manual • ·' • SECTION 6.4 WETPOOL F AC!LI1 iSIGNS t/24/2005 Vault Width 15' 20' 40' 60' Sediment Depth (from bottom of side wall) 10" 9" 6" 4" 2. Criterion 5: The second cell shall be a minimum of 3 feet deep since planting cannot be used to prevent resuspension of sediment in shallow water as it can in open ponds. Vault Structure Wetvaults shall be designed as flow-through systems. he vault shall be separated into two cells by a wall or a removable baffle.2 6 If a wall or non- emovable baffle is used, a 5-foot by JO-foot removable maintenance access must be provided for both cells. If a removable baffle is used, the following criteria apply: a) The baffle shall extend from a minimum of I-foot above the WQ design water surface to a minimum of l foot below the invert elevation of the inlet pipe. b) The lowest point of the baffle shall be a minimum of 2 feet from the bottom of the vault, and greater if feasible. 3. If the vault is less than 2,000 cubic feet (inside dimensions) or if the length-to-width ratio of the vault pool is 5: l or greater, the baffle or wall may be omitted and the vault may be one-celled. 4. The two cells of a wetvault shall not be divided into additional subcells by internal walls. If internal structural support is needed, post and pier construction may be used to support the vault lid rather than walls. Any walls used within cells must be positioned so as to lengthen, rather than divide, the flowpath. Intent: Treatment effectiveness in wetpool facilities is related to the extent to which plug flow is achieved and short-circuiting and dead zones are avoided. Structural walls placed within the cells can interfere with plug flow and create significant dead zones, reducing treatment effectiveness. 5. Internal walls to lengthen the flow path or allow the inlet and outlet to be at the same side of the vault may be used if an adjustment is granted. An adjustment may be granted only if physical site constraints prevent the standard configuration and design features promote water quality treatment. Required design features to approve an adjustment include minimizing dead spaces, minimizing turbulence, and promoting plug flow. Internal walls must extend to the 2-year water elevation, a minimum of 10 feet must be between the walls, and a distance equal to the width between the internal walls must be provided between the internal wall and the vault wall at the point that the flow turns around the wall. All vault requirements apply to each length/segment. Intent: Confined movement around the internal walls _creates turbulence, creates dead zones and decreases treatment effectiveness. 6. The bottom of the first cell shall be sloped toward the access opening. Slope shall be between 0.5 percent (minimum) and 2 percent (maximum). The second cell may be level (longitudinally) sloped toward the outlet, with a high point between the first and second cells. 7. The vault bottom shall slope laterally a minimum of 5% from each side towards the center, forming a broad "v" to facilitate sediment removal. Note: More than one "v" may be used to minimize vault depth. 26 As used here, the term baffle means a divider that does not extend all the way to the bottom of the vault, or if a bottom baffle, does not extend all the way to the top of the water surface. A wall is used here to mean a divider that extends all the way from near the water surface to the bottom of the vault. 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 6-84 6.4.2 r 6.4.2 WETVAULTS · ,. WETVAUJLTS A we/vault is an underground structure similar in appearance to a detention vault, except that a wetvault has a permanent pool of water that dissipates energy and improves the settling of particulate pollutants (see the wetvault details, Figure 6.4.2.A, on page 6-88). Being underground, the wetvault lacks the biological pollutant removal mechanisms, such as algae uptake, present in surface wetponds. Applications and Limitations A wetvault may be used in any type or size of development. However, it is most practical in relatively small catchments (less than l O acres of impervious surface) with high land values because vaults are relatively expensive. Combined detention and wetvaults are allowed; see Section 6.4.4 (p. 6-95). A wetvault is believed to be ineffective in removing dissolved pollutants such as soluble phosphorus or metals such as copper. There is also concern that oxygen levels will decline, especially in warm summer months, because of limited contact with air and wind. However, the extent to which this potential problem occurs has not been documented. If oil control is required for a project, the wetvault may be combined with the baffle oiVwater separator facility (see Section 6.6.2, p. 6-145) to fulfill Special Requirement #5, "Oil Control" (see Option 5, Section 6.1.5, p. 6-14). Consult the water quality menus in Section 6.1 (p. 6-3) for i,iformation on how this facility may be used to meet Core Requirement #8 and Special Requirement #5. 6.4.2.1 METHODS OF ANALYSIS As with wetponds, the primary design factor that determines the removal efficiency of a wetvault is the volume of the wetpool in relationship to the volume ofrunoff(V,.) from the mean annual storm25 • The larger the volume, the higher the potential for pollutant removal. Performance is also improved by avoiding dead zones (like corners) where little exchange occurs, using large length-to-width ratios, dissipating energy at the inlet, and ensuring that flow rates are uniform to the extent possible and not increased between cells. Wetvaults sized using the design methodology below (with a volume of 3 V,) and following the required design criteria in Section 6.4.2.2 are expected to meet the Basic WQ menu goal of 80% TSS removal. The methods of analysis for the wetvault are identical to the methods of analysis for the wetpond. Follow the procedure specified in Section 6.4.1.1 (p. 6-70) to determine the wetpool volume for the wetvault. 6.4.2.2 DESIGN CRITERIA Typical design details and concepts for the wetvault are shown in Figure 6.4.2.A (p. 6-88). Wetpool Geometry Same as specified for wetponds (see Section 6.4.1.2, p. 6-73) except for the following two modifications: I.· Criterion 3: The sediment storage in the first cell shall be an average of I foot. Because of the v-· shaped bottom, the depth of sediment storage needed above the bottom of the side wall is roughly proportional to vault width according to the schedule below: 25 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Results of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program, 1986. 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 1/24/2005 6-83 Roger McDonald 10033 se l 92"d st Renton Wa. 98055 253-852-1157 e-mail beachloverlinda@hotmail.com October 26 2008 This is to notify you of property damage that has occurred because of construction on the development south of my property, Talbot Ridge Estates. I have notified Belmont Homes V.P. Cliff Williams and met with him and a supervisor, Bud of Frontier Construction on October 14 2008 regarding damage to our concrete driveway, garage floor, basement floor and foundation. We feel vibration and shaking from heavy equipment has caused cracks in the cement. Robert Wenzl of Belmont homes spoke to me and my wife on our property September 12 2008 regarding a temporary construction easement . At that time we told him of our concern about the damage vibration and shaking might cause. October I 2008 I told an operator on a backhoe that the vibrating roller was shaking things off the shelves in my garage and to please stop. October 9 2008 I had talked to Bud of Frontier Construction about the house shaking when they get near it. Bud said he would talk to Cliff Williams about it. October 13 2008 equipment was running within 30 feet of my house causing a lot of shaking, the next day I first noticed cracks in the concrete floor of the garage .I have also reported this situation to King County and Renton officials in charge of the Talbot Ridge Estates project. I am sending you this so there is a record of some of the steps we have taken so far. We have also taken dated photos. LANO USE \NSPECilON OCi 3 0 'l.008 RECE\\JEO Meins, Mike From: Sent: Kayren Kittrick [Kkittrick@ci.renton.wa.us] Monday, October 13, 2008 9:44 AM To: Cliff Cc: Kenneth Glasby; Pat Miller; Meins, Mike Subject: Re: Talbot Ridge Estates -192nd St Off-site Improvements Complete closure requires the following: 1. A traffic control plan showing all detours and signage to be approved by our Transportation Division of Public Works. 2. An agenda bill and report including conditions of approval prepared and sent through the City Council process. Scheduling the bill to go through the Transportation Committee for referral. 3. Attend the Committee meeting to plead the case of why it is needed and how it is a benefit to the City. Helps if you agree with the conditions and are prepared with a proposed schedule of how many days closure is intended. The Committee members will make their recommendation and refer back to Council for full decision. 4. If approved, implement all conditions and maintain signs throughout the duration of the project. Typical conditions are: Approved traffic control and detour plan. Informational signs regarding the closure and detour at minimum two weeks in advance. The signs should also include contact phone numbers of the contractor and probably a City number for contact or complaints. Notices in the local newspapers for two consecutive weekends, including location map and duration, prior to closure. I will have staff find a previous closure with conditions to use as a template and Ken will be in touch regarding timing and any additional conditions that should be worked out before taking it to council. It really isn't a complicated process if one is prepared. Kayren K. Kittrick Development Eng. Supervisor Permits & Inspections Development Services Division (425) 430-7299 >» "Cliff" <Cliff@belmonthomeswa.com> 10/13/2008 9:17 AM »> Kayren: I would like to thank you and your staff for assisting us in evaluating the option of constructing the 192nd St sight distance improvements on partial closure basis. The additional signage, traffic control and daily closure/opening sequence has proved to be too costly. Therefore, we will be requesting City Council approval for full closure during construction. We are scheduling the work for the Spring of '09 to stay out of wet weather construction conditions. Please advise what the process is for applying to council for closure. Thanks Cliff Williams 1 ( soc Page I of2 Meins, Mike From: Cliff [Cliff@belmonthomeswa.com] Sent: Friday; July 11, 2008 1 :OD PM To: Wong, Wylie; Meins, Mike Cc: Pray, Jeff; Dye, Pete; Yasmoothr, Tham Subject: RE: Talbot Ridge Estates L08SI060-Plan Change Please put any further discussion of this on hold. Because of construction timing and a potentially lengthy review time, we probably won't be requesting a revision. For your information, this issue came up because of the DDES required extreme revisions to the original PE designed rockery. What was originally designed was determined structurally sound. However, personal feelings and comfort levels (all non-scientific) by DDES staff came into play requiring major changes resulting in a 30% increase in cost. We subsequently received bids for a Keystone wall at a lower cost. However, since the the supplier is not familiar with the DDES comfort levels with Keystone walls and in particular, whether additional reinforcing would be required by DDES reviewers, we are concerned a new full review of the Keystone standard design may prove to be very costly in time, review charges and construction costs. Cliff Williams Belmont Homes, Inc 206 714-7161 From: Wong, Wylie [mailto:Wylie.Wong@kingcounty.gov] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 11:11 AM To: Meins, Mike; Cliff Cc: Pray, Jeff; Dye, Pete; Yasmoothr, Tham Subject: RE: Talbot Ridge Estates L08SJ060-Plan Change Mike, I need to check with Pete on next Monday regarding the plan change policy. I am not aware of any change on the plan change policy for the last five years. All plan changes were filed with LUIS from 1999 to 2004 when I worked at LUIS. I have never initiated any_glan change at ERS since summer 2004. I did review glan c_hanges that created byJ_UIS for the four y~ars. You need to check with Steve whether Plan Change is allowed for Early Start. Tham, Do you still create Plan Change activity?. Thanks, Wylie From: Meins, Mik Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 4:22 PM To: Wong, Wylie; 'Cliff' Cc: Pray, Jeff Subject: RE: Talbot Ridge Estates L08SJ060 Wylie- 07/11/2008 soc Page 2 of2 ,• . • Sorry, but no. The design plan change forms state at the top "Not To Used for Early Starts." The early start plan needs to be amended and reviewed through ERS, not LUIS. I confirmed this with Jeff and Steve. Mike Meins, Engineer II ODES Land Use Inspections 206. 296. 6678 From: Wong, Wylie Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 11:04 AM To: Meins, Mike; 'Cliff' Subject: RE: Talbot Ridge Estates L085!060 Mike, You need to write up a plan change form and create a plan change activity from LUIS, then the applicant provides three sets of revised plans and the plan change form to me for process. Thanks, WW From: Meins, Mike Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 10:55 AM To: Cliff Cc: Wong, Wylie Subject: RE: Talbot Ridge Estates L085!060 Cliff- I met with Joe Marino on the proposed wall change from the rockery design. This change would normally require a Design Plan Change, however, since this is an Early Start it needs to be a revision to the plans for the Early Start. I confirmed this with Steve Townsend and Jeff Pray. Please initiate this change with Wylie Wong in Engineering Review. Let me know if there is any thing you need from me to make this change. Thanks, Mike Meins, Engineer II ODES Land Use Inspections 206.296. 6678 07/11/2008 ACORD. CERTIFICA'1 t: OF LIABILITY INSURANC ... OPID 3~ CATE (MMfDDIYYYY) l!"RON-10 07/08/08 PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE Brown & Brown -Seattle HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR 2101 4th Avenue, suite 600 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. Seattle WA 98121 Phone:206-956-1600 l!"ax:206-956-9600 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURED INSURER A w .. tnn H1.tion1.l Auuranc• Co. 03943 INSURER B Frontier Construction Inc. INSURER C PO Box 7570 INSURER D Kent WA 98042 INSURER E /' COVERAGES 1HE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED N.AMED A90VE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING M-JY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF AAY CONmACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO Vvl-!ICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POUCIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS P#:> CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS ,m NsRc TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER DATE (MMIDONYI DATE (MM/DONY) LIMITS GENERAL LIABJLnY EACH OCCURRENCE $1,000 I 000 - 05/17/08 A X X COMMERCIAL GENERM. LIABILITY CF300008962 05/17/09 PREMISES(Ee oc'c'u~,mce\ I 100,000 -0 CLAIMS MADE ~ OCCUR -MED EXP (Any ooe p&rson) I 5,000 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY , 1,000,000 -GENERAL AGGREGATE ,2,000,000 - GEN"L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER PRCOUCTS -COMP/OP AGG I 2,000,000 I POLICY fx1 ~1fr n,oc AUTOMOBILE LIABJLnY CO.VSINED SINGLE LIMIT -S 1,000,000 A X A.NY AUTO CA300009524 05/17/08 05/17/09 (Ee eccidert) - ALL OVVNED AUTOS BODILY IN..u?Y -$ SCHEDU.ED AUTOS (P8r person) - X HIRED AUTOS BOOIL Y INJURY -(P&r acc1oont) $ X NON-OWNED AUTOS ~ ~ PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) $ GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY· EA ACCIDENT • RANYAUTO OTHER THAN EAACC • AUTO ONLY AGG ' EXCESS/UMBRELLA LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE I :=J OCCUR D CLAIMS MADE AGGREGATE • • ~ OEDUCT1BlE • RETENTION I • WORKERS COMPENSATION ANO lmRY 1.iMifs I x I' 1Hr A EMPLOYERS' LlABILnY A.NY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE CF300008962 05/17/08 05/17/09 EL. EACH ACCIDENT S 1,000,000 OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? WA STOP GAF EL, DISEASE. EA EMPLOYEE $1,000,000 ~t~h~zs~R~0v~si'O~s below E.L. DISEASE· POLICY LIMIT 11,000,000 OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES I EXCLUSIONS ADDEO BY ENDORSEMENT I SPECIAL PROVISIONS RE: Talbot Ridge Estates King County, its appointed and elected officials and employees, are named as additional insured with respect to liability relating to the construction or maintenance of the drainage facilities required by project, Talbot Ridge Estates. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION DEFT-35 SHOULD AN'( OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION Dept of Development & Environ services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton WA 98055 ACORD 25 (2001/08) DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TOTI-IE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LlABILnY OF AN'( l<IND UPON THE INSURER. ITS AGENTS OR ' .• © ACORD CORPORATION 1988 .. POLICY NUMBER: CP300008962 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG20261185 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED -DESIGNATED PERSON OR ORGANIZATION This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART. SCHEDULE Name of Person or Organization: King County. its appointed and elected officials and employees (If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations as applicable to this endorsement.) WHO IS AN INSURED (Section II) is amended to include as an insured the person or organization shown in the Schedule as an insured but only with respect to liability arising out of your operations or premises owned by or rented to you. CG 20 2611 85 © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 1984 ' .. ~ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov Project No. :."""""";,,.,.-h~--"'c+~,+-- Pro j ect Name: NAME. [) Developer&/f/: W/Lf.,L/fbt,( ( or designated represent1ltivef • 24-hr. Emergency Contact & Tel No: [ J Contractor: no,-.j'l~L?,..._,,'::>,r- [ ) License#: f].o.vf'C l <>O I I), \ [ ) Subcontractor: A-er: -Ap:,(; ..,) ~ [., c r. J License #: J4 Pe 1--~ <.$' C/ '-12-a ti [ ] Engineer: [ J Inspector: M11CG-MG1;J7 [ ] TESC Supervisor: ________ _ [ ] Other: ' , PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE FORM ADDRESS c.ft ~"'/A,,""es~-~ TELEPHONE NO. p_o. Bax. 7570 c,.,..,,.,1,10( fh.~ ZS3 0~i-"'r''lo AGENDA FOR MEETING -Check as items are discussed or marked NIA 1. Items Re uired at the Preconstruction Conference --w [ J Applicant transfer form designating contractor to act as the applicant ( or owner present) ~ HU:-[ j Issued permit and approved construction plans (including HPA). [ J HPA or Fisheries contact; HPA required _Yes _NoX..Developer Representative Initials. [ Forest Practice Permit required for> 5,000 board feet of marketable timber, provide copy to inspector. [ Approved sanitary and water utility plans copy to inspector received? _Yes .)(!'lo _[ ) Copy of Certificate of Liability Insurance naming King County as additional insured, required for any drainage facility work. [ Contractor's Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) location on-site or provided to King County (WAC 296-62-05409). ~ Easement(s) for off-site work; provide copy to inspector. [ Pre-Issuance Construction Authorization (PICA) letter, signed by King County and Develop.- 2. Items Required at the Job Site While Under Construction ~ Approved plans--~~ -/JO /2/w ~ [ J Issued permit (commercials) [ ] Right-of-Way Use permit S:Currentform\Preconst.wd.09-14-06 Page I of7 .---- 3. [ l Notice of Construction Activity sign (KCC 20.20.060) must be posted prior to any construction. (Requied for all formal subdivisions; and any grading and/or building permit subject to SEPA.) See Notice of Construction Activity flyer. Other Requirements f.J!:7'---0 '7 ~ s [6-.0 -Jo±=:. All construction details/procedu es are t shown on the approved plans, but can be found in the fillowing standards. [ ] Application Date ? 2"1--"Z-Oo5 [ ] King County Road Standards (KCRS) 1993; _1987; _1979; _1969; (check applicable standard) [ ] WSDOT/ APW A standard specifications and plans; manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), Construction Traffic Control. • /. [ ] Surface Water Design Manual ~ 1998; _1990; _1979; (check applicable standard) 4. You Are Required to Notify the Inspector at the Following Stages of Construction (KCRS Chapter9\ [ '] One working day prior to site work start-up. [ ] One working day prior to starting any underground utility work. (see Item 8). [ ] One working day prior to placing curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; passing density tests and "proof rolling" ae required. Density tests must be approved prior to proof rolling. (see Item 8). [ ] One working day prior to placing crushed rock. The developer/contractor shall first provide passing density and "proof rolling" test of the native subgrade to verify the subgrade is visibly firm, compact, and suitable for surfacing. [ ] Three working days prior to paving roadway. [ ] Three working days prior to start of work on cas~in-place concrete structures. 5. Erosion/Sedimentation Controls (ESC) ] Clearing limits shall be accurately flagged in the field as shown on the plan.prior to clearing. ] Native Growth Protection Easements shall be flagged or fenced as shown on plan. ] Erosion and sediment controls shall be installed as the first step ofconstruction. ] Field conditions may require that erosion and sedimentation measures indicated on the plans be modified or supplemented. [ ] The developer is responsible for the adequacy of all erosion and sediment controls throughout the life of th, project. [ ] Control mud onto existing streets. I) Install rock pad or truck wash at construction entrances; 2) Wash truck tires if necessary; 3) Keep adjoining roads clean. Don't wash mud and silt into drainage systems [ ] All denuded areas must be mulched and seeded or otherwise stabilized to prevent sedimen~laden water from leaving the site or entering the storm drainage systems. [ ] Provide an area on-site for cleaning concrete trucks. Effluent from concrete operations shall not be allowedto enter the stonn drainage systems. [ J Projects that fall under the 1990 or. 1998 drainage manual require covering within 12 hours from October I through March 31. [ J TESC Supervisor required per SWM Manual D.5.4 on all sites. [ J Highly Sensitive Site (SWM Manual D.5.4.) TESC Supervisor (several years of construction supervision or inspection and background in geology, soil science, or agronomy). Required for this site? Yes~ No)G,_~ If yes, Name & Phone No. ________________ _ [ J TESC Supervisor Sign, (name and phone number) required at all primary site entrances. (Can be .included on Construction Notice sign.) [ ] Recommend obtaining approval for non-standard water quality proposals well in advance of the need. 6. Utilities and Storm Drainage [ J All utility construction on KC Righ~of-Way requires a construction permit issued by Property Services (KCC 14.44). [ J Copies of approved plans and utility certificate must be provided before utility constru:tion begins. · [ ] Are there any underground crossings on existing County road? (See open cut policy and KC Road Standards Section 8.03). Open cuts are not generally authorized. Parallel cuts in roadway require full width overlay. [ ] Location conflicts. Notify inspector prior to any relocation. [ J Pipe specifications, bands, gaskets, bedding (WSDOT/APWA) Standard Specifications). [ J CPEP (N-12, Hi-Q) pipe requires extra care; store on flat surface to avoid deformation. [ ] Recommend locating CBs with at least two survey points to avoid misalignment with curb and gutter. S:Currentform\Preconst.wd.09-14-06 Page 2 of7 Compaction Method • Mechanical • Water settling = ~egardless of method used, density standards must be met and documented (see Item 8). y1 ~inish work on drainage structures • Adjustment sections minimum of one, maximum 16 inches. • Grout • Ladders -extend to within 16 inches from bottom of each catch basin and securely fastened to CB. o Frames, covers, and grates -OUTFALL TO STREAM -DUMP NO POLLUTANTS, PROPERTY OF KING COUNTY, STORM OR DRAIN ("Property of King County" not required for private systems). • Locking covers and grates required outside of traveled roadway. 1993 KCRS projects: all storm drain covers and grates shall be locking (except rolled grates in rolled curb). · [ ] Lot stubouts installed and staked prior to signoff, 2 x 4 painted white and marked "Storm" or "Drain.'' [ ] All utilities including vaults, distribution lines, and poles located within road section must be installed prior to final construction approval. [ ] Utility poles and other obstacles must be located per King County standards, generally no closer than IO feet from edge of traveled way. ] Call ONE-CALL (1-800-424-5555) and locate all existing utilities prior to starting any work. ] All road closures must be approved by the King County ~epartrnent of Transportation, Traffic,in advance. 7. Retention/Detention Facilities [ I Property comers on easements and tracts must be permanently staked, and facilities must be built within the easement/tact as shown on the plans. [ Pond and berm slopes shall be 3: I or flatter, unless otherwise approved. · [ RID facilities shall be constructed and operational prior to any building construction; curbing, paving, or recording of subdivision/PUDs (KCC 9.04.090). Documentation required per Public Rule. Discuss Public Rule requirements. Control Structures: [ h Access road to control structure, pond bottom, vaults, or tanks (' • Width and surfacing, 12-foot-wide crushed surfacing (15 feet on curves) • Bollards or fence gates [/] Restrictor "T'' section riser and gate control assembly o Recommend inspection of "T" section prior to instal]ation • Gate and outlet pipe must be watertight • Materials must be similar • Min. 2-foot clearance from ladder and any obstruction • Riser straps and gate chain/rod required • Must be able to open gate from the riser ~ ]l Ladders must extend to within 16 inches of bottom of each basin and be securely fastened to the CB wall. Covers on restrictor and access manholes must be solid, round, locking lids marked STORM or DRAIN. Locking covers shall be required on all facilities located outside the curb, ditch line, or normal driving surface. I 993 KCRS projects: all storm drain covers and grates shall be locking. 8. Roadway Certification Requirements: The following guidelines will be used by the Department of Development and Environmental Services for minimum test and sample frequency. Additional tests may be required as the inspector deems necessary. Density Tests: WSDOT Sec. 2-03.3(14)0, KCRS 9.04, 3.03 o 90% or 95o/o, moisture coritent,::. 3% above optimum S:CUrrentform\Preconst.wd.09-14-06 Page 3 of7 [ (1 Compaction control tests .· • WSDOT method No. 609 (AASHTO T-99/Standard Proctor). For >25% retained on the #4 sieve, use Standard Proctor with Rock Correction Factor. [ ~ • PE review and approval Trenches: See Utility Trench Compaction Rule, November 1983, and KC Road Standards Section 8.03. Sanitary, storm, water, gas, and power, etc., in the roadway prism: • Minimum one test every trench, and one test every 500 feet oftrench length • Test up to 50% trench depth (top 4 feet-95%; below 4 feet-90%) • In-place densities and moisture content shall be determined by the nuclear gauge or Washington densometer method • Test as trench is backfilled • Controlled density fill may be used above bedding ( ) Cut section: WSDOT Sec. 2-06 • Minimum one test every 500 feet (100 feet, 1993 KCRS) on roadway subgrade, under curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Top. 6 inches minimum density 95%. Curb, gutter, and sidewalk 90% • (pre 1993 KCRS projects only): Firm and compacted under sidewalks (WSDOT Sec. 8-14) Embankment and fill sections: WSDOT Sec. 2-03.3(14)C • Minimum one test every 500 lineal feet on each foot of fill (1,000 cyds., 1993 KCRS) o A minimum of one test per lift • Compaction method B shall be used unless otherwise specified • 95% top 2 feet 90% below 2 feet • · Curbs, gutters, and sidewalks minimum density 90% (1993 KCRS) or Subgrade: KCRS 4.02 [ ] Standard material thickness are not acceptable if native subgrade is unstable as shown durirg the proof roll test. Remedial measures will be subject to review and approval by King County prior to installation [ J Asphalt Treated Base (A TB) KCRS 4.04 may be used over isolated areas of unstable subgrade. Six month delay with traffic loading required prior to final left. [ ] Soil Amendments, Cement Treated Base (CTB) , Cement Kiln Dust (CKD), etc. require King County review and approval prior to use. oncrete Tests: WSDOT Sec. 6-02 ] Developer/contractor must notify inspector for confermce prior to beginning work ] Mix to conform to standards and must be verified on delivery tickets. State mix design (602.3(2)C) must be used unless approved by King County. Standard mix does not include fly ash Curbs must conform to Drawing Ni. 9. Back must be 12" high and 6" in front. Sidewalks are 4" behind vertical curb, except at driveways where the thickness shall be 5". Sidewalks shall be 5" behind rolled curb [ ) Joints in curb and gutter shall conform to Drawing No. 8 [ ) Wheelchair ramps shall conform. to WSDOT standards [ J Slump tests: Max. 3" vibrated concrete, 7" nonvibrated concrete ] Cylinder tests, 7 days, 28-day strength, normally 3,000 psi Concrete structures certification: [ ] Bridges, retaining walls, and retention vaults must be designed by a professional structural engineer and may require s71 inspections per the Uniform Building Code (see 170 I, 1994 UBC). Special inspections required on this job --r'<::; Yes __ No 9. Surfacing and General Requirements: Review Standards Not Shown on Plans [ ] Asphalt paving --laydown methods/equipment: WSDOT Sec. 5-04, pavers self-contained, power-propelled units. Truck- mounted pavers shall only be used for paving of irregularly-shaped or minor areas, or (KCRS 4.04): I. Pavement widths< 8 feet 2. Pavement lengths< 150 feet [ Mailbox locations, conflicts with pedestrian/handicapped access [ ) M.ailbox stands, NDCBUs installed before Final Construction Approval (KCRS 5.04) [ ] Finish work on cut-and-fill slopes: Sec. 8.05 S:Currentform\Preconst.wd.09-14-06 Page 4 of7 ) ; Safety and Traffic hazards (KCRS 9.05) l, • Traffic control: required for all work in the righl-of-way of the traveling public, must comply with the MUTCD • Utility poles or other natural or manmade obstacles higher than 6" o Walls require end design protection • Flaggers must have state flagging cards [ ] Roadside culverts, beveled ends [ ] Quarry Spalls: 8 inches minus WSDOT Sec. 9-13.6 ] Barricades--construction: orange and white, stripes sloped downward 45 degree in the dil:ction traffic is to pass • Temporary closures: Type III • Street termination permanent: red and white stripes and end-of-road marker • Plan Change Procedure c_fi Any changes to the originally approved plan will require a Plan Change and must be reviewed bythe inspector prior to / ' construction and approval. Design Plan Changes also require submittal and approval by the King County Department of Development and Environmental Services, Land Use Services and/or Building Services Divisions. • 2003 Fee ordinance fees are: (Please note, fees are subject to change yearly) • Land Use Services review fees: $1,605.28 each submittal and $140.00 per hour (deposit required) • Building Services review fees: $ 1,605.28 each submittal and $140.00 per hour (deposit required) Inspection Fees/ Additional Financial Guarantees [ ] Current hourly fee is$ 140.00. [ ] All inspection charges for this permit will be hourly. [ ] Each reinspection (performing the same inspection again on a different day) will be charged a $460 einspection fee ($212.75 residential single family). [ ] Supplemental Inspections (inspections after punch list indicates all fieldwork is complete; required if Final Construction Approval is not granted within 30 days of punch list) will be charged a mhimum of 1.5 hours (at the current rate). · Financial Guarantees [ /i Public improvements require a maintenance and defect financial guarantee that will guarantee improvements and (' maintenance for two years. These financial guarantees will be required befire Final Construction Approval. e 2000 subdivision/short subdivisions [ ] Plats/short plats without drainage facilities may be recorded before Final Construction Approval after posting a performance financial guarantee and approval by the inspectcr. Drainage facilities on plats/short plats must be constructed and in operation prior to recording. (See RID public rule and KCC 9.04.090) ear 2000 and later subdivisions and short subdivision require minimum improvements be constructed prior to recoding (KCC 19A.I30) Commercial permits require a performance Financial Guarantee for site work if temporary occupancy is requested before Final Construction Approval. IO. Code Compliance (KCC Title 23) Construction Deficiency Forms Notice of Violation: hourly fee ($460 reinspection fee may apply) [ Stop Work: $500 initial penalty, hourly fee [ Notice and Order: hourly fee [ ] Civil penalties: Additional $100 to $500 for each: public health risk, environmental damage, histmy, economic benefit [ ] Citations: $100 penalty 11. Bond (Financial Guarantee) Forfeiture [ f Restoration financial guarantee S:Currentform\Preconst.wd.09-14-06 Page 5 of? I l I • Can be used at any time after notice by King County Performance financial guarantees • All improvements must be approvw within two years from recording/six months after occupancy Maintenance/defect fmancial guarantees • Two-year warrantee period • Repairs must be completed within 30 days • Inspections/release by DNR/DOT 12. Expiration of Approval All projects have an project is "2 I from recording. _,,,/"' 5 v..-fiwM ~M. ~' z../z.1 /-z...oo? xpiration date after which the plan approval/issuance is null and void. The expiration date for this -Z-01-Z..-Plats and short plats that are recorded do not expire, but must be completed with in 2 years [ l If the project cannot be completed before the expiration date, you must apply for an extension. Plats • Preliminary plat extensions are not authorized. Short Plats o Preliminary short plat extensions are approved by Land Use Services Division; contact the lllgineering Review Section, Platting Unit. Right-of-Way Use Permits • Right-of-Way Use Permitnxtensions are approved by Land Use Inspection, contact the inspector. Building Permits • Contact the Building Services Division, Inspections Section. Temporary Certificate Of Occupancy (TCO} • Land Use Inspection approval required: Drainage facilities Parking Access Performance Financial Guarantee 13. Final Inspection Process \ Initiated by developer at the time project is completed or request for occq,ancy certificate Allow 30 days to inspect and to prepare punchlist Punchlists are good for 30 days and may be subject to revision upon reinspection after 30 days. Otherwise, no changes shall be made to the punchlist unless directed by the in,pection Senior Engineer. · [ Inspection and punch list timelines are subject to staffing level and weather limitations. [ Request reinspection after all punch list items have been addressed. s,currentform\Preconst.wd.09-14-06 Page 6 of? 14. Specific Notes from P)ans IS. Signature As the Owner or Designated Representative (applicant fonn required), I understand the requirements of King County Land Use Inspection Section procedures and agree to abide by the conditions of the pennit and the procedures discussed. S1CUrrentfor11I\Preconst.wd.09-14-06 Page 7 of7 tQ King County 'Ii: Web date: 0612812007 CERTIFICATION & TRANSFER OF APPLICANT STATUS Department of Development and Environmental Senrices ~----------------~ 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 For alternate fonnats, call 206-296-6600. Pennit Number: L05P0007f;;k'JY'R.'0/6,/ f FOR CURRENT OWNER: /kL,f{e-t/1--T~J> A-1/ tTf /ftJ. > , I, John W. O'Neil , (print name) hereby certify that I am an/the owner of the property which is the subject of this application for permit or approval. If I am not the sole owner of the property, I certify that I am authorized by any and all other owners of the property to make this certification and transfer any and all rights I/we have to apply for this permit or approval to the person 6sted below. I, therefore certify that Talbot Ridge Estates LLC (print name) is the "applicant" for this permit or approval and shall remain the "applicant" for the duration of this permit or approval unless "applicant" status is transferred in writing on a form provided by this department. By being the "applicant." that individual assumes financial responsibility for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. June 3, 2008 Date Signed FOR INDIVIDUALS: I, , (print name) hereby certify that I am the "applicant" for this permit or approval. I shall remain the "applicant" for the duration of this permit or approval unless "applicant" status is transferred in writing on a form provided by this department. I accept financial responsibility for all fees associated with this permit or approval and will receive any refunds. My mailing address is: I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. Signature of Applicant OR FOR CORPORATIONS/BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS: Date Signed I, {j.;/7 ~A..D @/t_,C.//f'-n,15 , (print name) hereby certify that I am an authorized agent of T · ,£5,. T S ,1..._1-C , a corporation or other business association authorized in the Sta e of Washington an that this business association is the "applicant" for this permit or approval and is financially responsible for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. This association shall remain the "applicant" for the duration of this permit or approval unless "applicant" status is transferred in wl<Pn t~~ov~l/btYs department. The mailing address of this business association is: tRR=~ ,1 l1Y II 9@oB3 rjurfunder the laws of the State of Washingto TaJbotRldgeCertAndTransferApplicantStatusFORM.doc lc-cer-trapstat.pdf 06/28/2007 .. OTICE TO APPLICANTS: By law, this department returns all engineering and other plans to the applicant. If, however, you wish to authorize the department to return engineering and other plans directly to the engineer, architect, or other consultant for the limited purpose of making corrections, please designate below: igJ I authorize this department to return plans directly to my consultant(s) for the limited purpose of making corrections, as designated on this form. CONSULTANTS: Check out the DDES Web site at www.kingcounty.gov/permits TalbotRidgeCertAndTransferApplicantStatusFORM.doc lc-cer-trapstat.pdf 06/28/2007 Web date: 06/29/2007 ~ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 DROP-OFF COVER SHEET FOR LUSD ONLY For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Drop-Off Cover Sheet for Land Use Services Division "' DATE RECEIVED BY LU®; PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME IS NECESSARY FOR ALL DROP-OFFS Project No L O 5 PCJOD 7 Project Name 7d-l,p0r faLq".C . . FRO~zt;:ir,q1~£;G1,/!!-A_f//: Jt)d,l/1'/MS • Cmpiny Name/Contact Person TO Tel4~°;;~/;f~7/?/ ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY KING COUNTY STAFF (please print) Short Plat/ Plats Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Lot Line Adjustment Permit Please specify"item(s) dropped-off: Right of Way Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Clearing I Grading Permit -Additional information requested. Please specify itern(s) dropped-off: "' c_ c:: C, r- ,z:, I N 0 ,,., ]> :JC V> -.. en ~! ,,_,,,. r"l (.) ,·.-i < M w PLEASE NOTE: All drop-off item(s) will be logged into the computer under the project number, therefore, it is important that t11e top portion of this form is completed properly before you drop-off anything. Assistance in finding a pmjecl nurnber can tie provided by speaking to a Zoning/Land Use Technician. Your cooperation is important. Thank you. Check out the ODES Web site at www.kingcounty.,gov/permits D rop-OffC overS heet-L USOOnlyFORM .doc lg-cvs-d ropoff .pdf OG/29/2007 Page1of1 ) I I ' -= ,_ ' - ~" L_ --' / I h / 1--1--,_ 1--'--+- I, L-+-+- I ~ +-+-11 -- , ,-l---i------1 a Cl I II I I If-+-+-+- soc \ ~ King County ODES Parcel Information Report -Change Rep__«>rt- This report was generated: 6/23/2008 4:12:05 PM I ~~!'"' Print Report [ Parcel Number: 0522059045 -C_l!_;rnge Ref!ort Parcels-® 8 Base Info Parcel Number: 0522059045 Tax Payer: BELMONT HOMES INC Property Name: N/A Annexation: Benson Hill (Recent) Jurisdiction: Renton Situs Address: No Address Assigned Zip Code: 98055 Posta_l_C.Lty B Reference Info Plat Name: N/A Plat Recording Date: N/A Plat Lot: N/A Plat Block: N/A Kroll Page: 609 Thomas Brothers Page: 686 1/4-S-T-R: NW-5-22-5 Lot Area: 189,921 SqFt. (4.36 Acres) B Planning Info Zoning: R-6 Comprehensive Land Use: um Development Condition: N/A Assessor's Open Space: N/A Commercial Use: N/A Number of Units: N/A Page 1 of 2 The Information Included in this report has been compiled by staff from a variety of sources and Is subject to change withou County makes no representations or warranties, express or impl accuracy, completeness, tlmellness, or rights to the use of suet King County shall not be liable for any general, special, Indirect, consequential damages Including, but not limited to, lost rev, profits resulting from the use or misuse of the Information con report. Any sale of this report or information on this report except by written permission of King County. Appraised Land Value: 2008 -$1,562,000, 2007 -$1,414,000, 2006 -$1,360,000 Appraised Improvements Value: 2008 -$0, 2007 -$0, 2006 -$0 8 Administrative District Info Community Plan Area: Soos Creek Unincorporated Area Council: N/A School District: Kent School District 415 Fire District: King County Fire Protection District No. 37 (37) Roads MPS Zone: 343 (Fee N/A) Roads Transportation Concurrency Mitigation Zone: 803, 795 Waterfront: No Water System: WATER DISTRICT soc ;,A Water Service Planning Area: N/A Sewer System: PUBLIC Airport Noise Remedy Program: N/A Council District: 5 Julia Patterson Drainage Basin: Black River: WRIA 9 Police Jurisdiction: King County Police Precinct: 3 Police District: F4 Snowload Zone: Standard Agricultural Production District: N Forest Production District: N Rural Forest Focus Area: N Transfer Development Rights Type: N/A Transfer Development Rights Status: N/A Transfer Development Rights Permit Number: N/A El Inspection Area Info Building Inspection Area: S-6 Clearing Inspection Area: Richelle Rose Code Enforcement Inspection Area: Bill Turner ESA Inspection Area: Kathy Newborn Grading Inspection Area: Ramon Locsin Land Use Inspection Area: Mike Meins El Sensitive/Critical Area Info Sensitive Areas Notice(s) on Title: None Sensitive Historic Site: None Bald Eagle Data: Bald Eagle Flag: N/A Aquatic Areas Buffer: N Basin Condition: Low Flow Control Area: N/A Water Quality: N/A Critical Aquifer Recharge Area: None Area of Potential Wetland Influence: N Shoreline Management Master Program Designation: None GIS Mapping Operations {GISMO) Version 1.2. 1 Page 2 of 2 soc IA ~ King County DOES Permit Information Report -Change ReRort- This report was generated: 6/23/2008 4:14:37 PM I ~::;.' Print Report I Parcel Number: 0522059045 -Change ReRort Parcels-® Page 1 of 1 The Information Included In this report has been complied by staff from a variety of sources and Is subject to change withou County makes no representations or warranties, express or lmpl accuracy, completeness, tlmellness 1 or rights to the use of suet King County shall not be liable for any general, special, Indirect, consequential damages Including, but not limited to, lost rev, profits resulting from the use or misuse of the Information con report. Any sale of this report or Information on this report except by written permission of King County. Select one or more records and click the Get Report button for a detailed report. Select_AII I Clear Selected I Switcl]_Selection ii~ I~ l~.I~ 11~ I~ I~ L08GF027 FOREST GRANTED TALBOT RIDGE FPA 0522059045 WENZL ROBERT 05/2! ,A08BN159 BOND RECEIVED $22,913 REST FG 0522059045 $22,913 REST-INCL $7500 C ... 05/2: 1AOBBN142 BOND OPEN $41,398 LAND PERF FG 0522059045 $41,398 LAND PERF FG 05/0! , LOBSR023 SITEREV COMPLETE TALBOT RIDGE EST 0522059045 JWO LLC 05/01 1 L07SR012 SITEREV PENDING TALBOT RIDGE ESTATE ... 0522059045 WENZL ROBERT 02/2! LOSV0066 SUBVAR GRANTED LOSP0007 0522059045 WILLIAMS, CLIFF 08/21 1 LOSV0061 SUBVAR GRANTED TALBOT RIDGE ESTATE ... 0522059045 BELMONT HOMES, INC 08/1! ; LOSP0007 PRE-PLAT PRELAPPR TALBOT RIDGE ESTATES 0522059045 WENZL ROBERT 03/2• I A05PM025 PREAPP-M COMPLETE 0522059045 BELMONT HOMES 01/21 1 LOBSI060 INSPECT OPEN TALBOT RIDGE EST/LOS ... 0522059045 WENZL ROBERT LOBSI061 INSPECT OPEN TALBOT RDGE EST/LOSP ... 0522059045 WENZL ROBERT L08SI062 INSPECT OPEN TALBOT RIDGE EST/LOS ... 0522059045 WENZL ROBERT -· -···· ···-"'"'. . Permits: 12 Visible Parcels: 1 Total Parcels: 1 I Get Report I s.oc ·A ~ King County DOES Report ori Assessor's Legal Info -Cl:li!n_g~ Ref:!Ort- Thls report was generated: 6/23/2008 4:15:08 PM J ~~"'· Print Report ] Parcel Number: 0522059045 -Change Ref:!ort Parcels-® Legal Description PORTION OF NW QTR GOVT LOT 4 IN NW QTR STR 05-22-05 DAF: BEGINNING AT POINT ON W LINE OF SAID NW QTR 33.66 FT SOUTH OF NW CORNER THEREOF TH S00-22-25W ALONG W LINE OF SAID NW QTR 261.46 FT TO EXISTING FENCE TH ALONG SAID FENCE S88-28-15E 215.76 FT TH S88-47-51E 299.07 FT TH S88- 12-26E 139.20 FT TO E LINE OF SAID NW QTR GOVT LOT 4 TH N00-30-18E ALONG SAID E LINE 275.22 FT TO S MARGIN OF S 192ND ST TH N89-26-59W ALONG SAIDS MARGIN 103.19 FT TO POINT CURVATURE TH WLY ALONG CURVE TO RIGHT WITH RADIUS OF 390 FT ARC DISTANCE OF 153.82 FT TO N LINE OF SAID GOVT LOT 4 TH N89-26-59W ALONG SAID N LINE 389.08 FT TH S20-35-12W 35.83 FT TO POB Page 1 of 1 The Information Included In this report has been compiled by staff from a variety of sources and Is subject to change withou County makes no representations or warranties, express or lmpl accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of suet King County shall not be liable for any general, special, Indirect, consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost rev, profits resulting from the use or misuse of the Information con report. Any sale of this report or information on this report except by written permission of King County. Taxpayer/Mailing Address BELMONT HOMES INC POB 2401 KIRKLAND WA 98083 GIS Mapping Operations (GISMO) Version 1.2. 1 soc DOES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton. Washington 98057-5212 June 23, 2008 Summary of Related Activities/Projects/Dev. Page 1 of 1 ·----···-··------·-·---·---------------··------··-··-·-··--···-·-· ··-.. -·-----.. -----·-··-----· -·····----------·---·--- Applicant: WENZL ROBERT PO BOX 2401 Activity Number: Project Number: L05P0007 KIRKLAND, WA 98083-2401 Development Number:· PRE-PLAT 425-893-84 78 Status: -··---··--------- Activity/Project# Comp Type Status Fee Charges Hours Charges *L05P0007 PRE-PLAT PRELAPPR $26, l 02.69 $0.00 A05PM025 PREAPP-M COMPLETE $130.21 $905.64 A08BNl42 BOND OPEN $205.00 $0.00 6.Q.[BN 1_5_<J BOND RECEIVED $23,118.00 $0.00 L05V0061 SUBVAR GRANTED $102.64 $1,746.06 l,05VOO(i_(i SUBY AR GRANTED $1,087.54 $1,267.90 *L07SR012 SITEREV PENDING $32,255.18 $0.00 L08.QEP.fl FOREST GRANTED $0.00 $1,204.00 L08Ml02.2 L-MJSC COMPLETE $103.00 $875.00 *kl)8SI06Q INSPECT OPEN $32,303.00 $0.00 L08Sl061 INSPECT OPEN $2,623.00 $0.00 L08SI062 INSPECT OPEN $2,623.00 $0.00 L08SR023 SITEREV COMPLETE $103.00 $4,501.00 TOTAL: $120,756.26 $10,499.60 * Asterisk denotes Permit under Project Management PRELAPPR Payments $26,102.69 $1,035.85 $0.00 $23,118.00 $2,182.35 $2,355.44 $14,405.88 $0.00 $663.00 $32,303.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,604.00 $106,770.21 Balance Due $0.00 $0.00 $205.00 $0.00 ($333.65) $0.00 $17,849.30 $1,204.00 $315.00 $0.00 $2,623.00 $2,623.00 $0.00 $24,485.65 --·----------·.,··--------------·------·--------·-·--···"---··-----·····-······ --·----·-····--· .. ·····-··----. ----·---~------·-... _ -· The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to DDES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be I billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before DDES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O . . ... ...•. ' ...... ·-. . ... ..... .. .. . -.. . . .•. , .. Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Web date: 11121/2005 (@» King Q>unty . Department of Development & Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 2oe-2-soo nv 2oe-286-1211 Project Name: Location: For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. Talbot Ridge ,_. C tvt.ly 5-f-=:;;;f i 19200 Blk 102nd Avenue SE Date: Project No.: Activity No.: 05/14/2008 L05P0007 L08SR023 Clearing greater than or equal t9 5,000 board feet of timber? Note: All prices include labor, equipment, materials, overhead and profit. Prices are from RS Means data adjusted for the Seattle area or from local sources If not included in the RS Means database. x yes If yes, Forest Practice Permit Number: (RCW76.09) Page 1 of9 04120BQWpees.xls ' no ~~ . (Aq,vi· ~~cl.-(~ A(f"~ ~. ~» ~~ · ~ -" ~ r ~ 0 Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 04/22/02 Report Date: 05/14/2008 .Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Check dams, 4" minus rock. ESC-2 SWDM 5.4.6.3 $ 67.51 ~h Crushed surfacing 1 114" minus ESC~ WSOOT 9-03.9(3) $ •• ·-ijo.4o I CY CY ,.so I CY , Ditching IESC-4 I · I $ 8.081 Excavation-bulk ESC-5 $ Fence, silt ESC-6 SWDM 5.4.3.1 $ 1.38 LF Fence, Temporary (NGPE) ESC-7 $ • 00 ,.oo I LF H droseedl ESC-6 SWDM 5.4.2.4. $ 0.59 SY Jute Mesh ESC-9 SWDM 5.4.2.2 $ . -1.45 SY MulchiJ,y_hand, straw, 3" deep I ESC-10 I SWDM 5.4.2.1 I $ 2.01 SY Mulch, by machine, straw, 2" deep IESC,11 · I SWDM 5.4.2.1 I$ 0.53 SY ~---Piping, temporary, CPP, 6'' IESC-12 I I $ 1u. ru 1 LF Piping, te~CPP, 8" IESC-13 I I$ 16.10 LF Piping, temporary, CPP, 12" IESC-14 I I$ 20.70 LF Plastic covering, 6mm thick, sandbagged IESC-15 I SWDM 5.42.3 I $ 2.30 SY Rip Rapi..!!l"chineplaced; s~ IESC-16 I W.SDQT_9-13.1(21 I$ 39.08 CY R.<>ckfon_structloQ.Ent.ranE&, 50'l<15'x1' IESC-17 I SWDM 5.4.4.1 I $ 1,464.34 Each Rock Construction Entrance, 100'x15'x1' ESC-18 SWDM 5.4.4.1 $ 2,928.68 Each Sediment pond riser assembly ESC-19 SWDM 5.4.5.2 $ • ···"" 1,::1'+::l . .:iO Each Sediment trap, 5' high berm I ESC-20 I SWDM 5.4.5.1 I $ 17.91 LF Sed. trap:5' high, riprapped splQway benn secllon fESC-21 I SWDM 5.4.5.1 I$ 68.54 LF 0 !\1 SY tLUJ SY Seeding, by hand · I ESC-22 I SWDM 5A.2.4 I $ -·-· 1 Sodding, 1" deep, level ground ESC-23 · SWDM 5.42.5 $ • •• Sodding, 1" deep, sloped ground !ESC-24 I SWDM 5.4.2.5 . I $ 7.45 SY TESC Supervisor I ESC-25 I f$ 74.75 HR Water truck, dust control 97 7; HR ... · tf41tMS'fe}ili ~,. ESC SUBTOTAL: 30% CONTINGENCY & MOBIUZATiON: ESCTOTAL: COLUMN: Page 2 of 9 04120BQWpees.xls Web da1e: 11121/2005 $ 15,392.73 . $ 4,617.82 $ 20,010.55 A Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 04122/02 Report Date: 05/14/2008 Site Improvement Bond Quantity ~orksheet Web date: 11/21/2005 Gl 0 2 $ 8.53 Gl-3 $ 0.38 Gl-4 $ 8,876.16 Gl-5 $ .1.50 Gl-6 $ 4.06 GI -7 $ 18.55 $ 13.44 $ 1,271.81 $ 12.12 $ 22.57 $ 25.48 $ 37.85 $ 54.31 $ 74.85 $ 132.48 $ 2.02 $ 0.95 $ 135.13 JGI ·1!!. $ 2.68 $ 7.46 Surveying, line & grade !GI.,-$ 768.26 GI • ., $ 1,556.64 1ers) !GI. 2• $ 85.18 GI-2' $ 7.59 GI. 21 $ 8.33 Gl-2 $ 8.19 GI· 2! $ 44.16 GI .:a, $ 9.49 Page 3 of9 SUBTOTAL ·Kee 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. 04120BQWpees.xls CY SY Acre [ I CY J J CY LF LF I I Each LF CY CY CY SY SY SY SY SY EachJ l Each SY Dal Acre HR SY SY SY SF SF 1 0.51 l 4843J I 1481 l 3J. 4,438.oal 7,264.~ 1.989.1 405. 18,278.37' 3[ 763!![ . --96,962.1_0 Unit prices updated: 02112102 Version: 4/22102 Report Date: 05/1412008 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Web date: 11/21/2005 $ $ 5.75 $ 1.38 $ 41.14. Barricade, tvnA I RI -5 $ 30.03 Barricade, tvoo Ill ( Permanent l Rl-6 $ 45.05 Curb & Gutter, rolled Rl-7 $ 13.27 Curb & Gutter, vertical Rl·-8 $ 9.69 Curb and ~utter, demolition and di~, Rl.9 $ 13.58 Lalt RI· 1' $ 2.44 $ 2.56 $ 1.85 $ 1.69 $ 0.99 $ . $ 7.53 $ 30.52 $ 27.73 $ 34.94 $ 34.65 ·$ 85.28 $ 5.82 RI."" $ 2.38 IRI • 2_41. $ 0.25 Page4of9 SUBTOTAL "KCC 27 A authorizes only one bond reduction. 04120BQWpees.xls SY SY SY LF LF LF I I LF I I LF LF LF LF I I .LF LF I I SY SY SY SY SYj l SY Each Each SF LF ---·----- I 8901 I 2001 I 260' I 260 l 415' 11,810.3~ ~ _29,044.94 4151 5,507. ·----~507.05 Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 05/14/2008 Site Improvement Bo,nd Quantity Worksheet Web date: 11121/2005 RS-31 $ 8.75 RS-41 $ 17.24 $ 13.36 $-19.69 $ 15.81 $ 14.57 AC Road, 5", ""'· over 2500 SY RS-! $ 13.94 f',C Road, 6", First 2500 SY ~S-1 $ 16.76 •. over 2500 SY RS -1 $ 16.12 $ 9.21 $ 11.41 Gravel Road, 4" rock, Olv. over2500 S ,is -1• $ 7.53 PCC Road, 5", no ba68, over 2500 SY RS-1 $ 21.51 PCC Road, 6", no base, over250Q SY ~S-1 $ 21.67 Thickened Edge ~S-1 $ 6.69 Page Sof9 SUBTOTAL ·Kee 27 A authorizes only one bond reduction. 041208QWpees.xls I I I SY SY SY SY I I I SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY SY LF 11201 6,192.0~ 172ol 22.979.20! 29,171.20 595 595, -~~-10,091.20 Unit prices updated: 02112/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 05/14/2008 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet D-2 $ ·240.74 Each 2 D-3 $ 452.34 Each 3 D-4 $ 1,257.64 Each 1,257.6 9 D-5 $ 1,433.59 Each D-6 $ 2,033.57 Each 3 D ·7 $ 436.52 FT 7 D ·8 $ 2,192.54 Each D ·9 $ 486.53 FT D-10 $ 2,351.52 Each 10-11 $ 536.54 . FT D • 12 $ 3,212.64 Each D • 13 $ 692.21 FT D -14 $ 366.09 Each Cleanou1, PVC, ir' D -15 $ 130.55 Each Cleanou1, PVC, 8" • D -16 $ 174.90 Each 221 Cleanou1, PVC, 8" D-17 $ 224.19 Each- Culvert. PVC, 4" D -18 $ 8.64 LF Culvert, PVC, 8" D -19 $ 12.60 LF 785 CUivert. PVC, 8" D -20 $ 13.33 LF Culvert. PVC, 12" D ·21 $ 21.77 LF Culvert, CMP, 8" D-22 $ 17.25 . LF Culvert. CMP, 12" D-23 $ 26.45 LF Culvert. CMP, 15" D-24 $ 32.73 LF Culvert. CMP, 18" D -25 $ 37.74 LF. Culvert. CMP, 24" D-26 $ 53.33 LF Culvert, CMP, 30" D -27 $ 71.45 LF Culvert, CMP. 38" D -28 $ 112.11 LF Culvert, CMP, 48" D-29 $ 140.83 LF Culvert, CMP, 60" D -30 $ 235.45 LF Culvert. CMP. 72" D -31 $ 302.58 LF Page 6 of9 SUBTOTAL 1,257.51 26,582.31 ·Kee VA authorizes only one bond reduction. 04120BQWpees.Xls Webdate: 11/2112005 9,691. 13,738.8()_ Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 05/14/2008 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Web date: 11/21/2005 · cutvert, Concrete, 8"' 0-3 2 $ 21.02 LF Culvert. concrete, 12" 0-33 $ 30.05 LF Culvert, Concrete, 15" 0 -34 $ 37.34 LF Culvert. Concrete, 18" 0 .35 $ 44.51 LF CUivert. Concrete, 24" 0-36 $ 61.07 LF Cutvert, Concrete. 30" 0-37 $ 104.18 LF Cutvert, Concrete. 36" 0 -38 $ 137.63 LF Culvert. concrete, 42" 0-39 $ 156.42 LF Cutvert, Concrete, 48" 0-40 $ 175.94 LF Culvert. CPP, 6" 0-41 $ 10.70 LF Culvert, CPP, 8" 0-42 $ 18.10 LF Culvert. CPP, 12" 0 .43 $ 20.70 LF j 3~ 662.~ 112~ 23287. Culvert. CPP, 15" 0-44 $ 23.00 LF Culvert, CPP, 16" 0 -45 $ 27.80 LF Culvert. CPP, 24" 0-46 $ 36.80 LF Culvert. CPP, 30" 0-47 $ 48.30 LF [Culvert. CPP; 36" 0-48 $ 55.20 LF 0-49 $ 8.08 CY 0-50 $ 25.99 LF 0-51 $ 22.80 LF 0-52 $ 2.40 SY 0-53 $ 74.75 HR ,0-54 .$ 1,605.40 Each 0-55 $ 14.01 SY 0 -56 $ 1,045.19 Each 0-57 $ 1,095.56 Eachj · J J 11-----1095. 0-58 $ 1,148.16 Each 0-59 $ 39.08 CY I Bi 312. 0-60 $ 1,000.50 Each 0-61 $ 211.97 Each Trash Rack, 15" 0-62 $ 237Z7 Each [Trash Rack, 18" 0 -63 $ 268.89 Eech Trash Rack, 21" 0-64 $ 306.84 Each Page 7 of9 SUBTOTAL 975.04 24363.06 Unit prices updated_: 02/12/02 ·Kee 27 A authorizes only one bond reduction. Version: 4122102 041_20BQWpees.,cls R_eport Date: 05/14/2008 .. Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Web date: 11/21/2005 Detention I 'NO. Vault Page 8 of 9 $_ 15.84 I SY $ _ 17.2<1 I SY $ 4.55 I SY $ 11.41 I SY Each Wl-2 SY Wl-3 CY Wl-4 LF ~ FT Wl-6 ··~ ~ Wl-9 \M · 10 SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL (SUM ALL PAGES): 30% CONTINGENCY & MOBILIZATION: GRANDTOTAL: COLUMN: · ·Kee 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. 04120BQWpees.xls -- 2°,232.68 669.BO 2,902.48 B 'i®iRtt0¥z??t@fP~1%W..-~tFFryw.ffTMWttiftffllliF· ~, J@&Wt~ 311,000., 311,000.00 438,459.88 131,537.96 569,997.84 C 126,299.15 37,889.75 164,188.90 D E Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22102 Report Date: 05/14/2008 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Web date: 11/21/2005 O~glnal bond computations prepared by: Name: __ _ Talbot Rid.9.e Date: 05/14/2008 PE Registration Number: Rob Stevens, 33251 Tel.#: (425)885-7877 Firm Name: · Core Desjg_n, Inc Address: 14711 NE 29th PL, Bellevue WA 98007. Project No: L05P0007 ROAD·IMPROVEMENTS & DRAINAGE FACILITIES FINANCIAL GUARANTEE REQUIREMENTS Stabflizatlon/Erosion Sediment Control (ESC) Existing Right-of-Way Improvements Future Public Road Improvements & Drainage Facil"' Private Improvements Calculated Quantity Completed Total Right-of Way and/or Site Restoration Boncf"r (First $7,500 ofbond"·shall be cash.) Performance Bond* Amount (A+B+C+D) = TOTAL Reduced Performance Bond" Total - Maintenance/Defect Bond• Total NAME OF PERSON PREPARING BOND* REDUCTION: PERFORMANCE BOND* .. AMOUNT (A) $ 20,010.5 (Bl $ 2,902.5 (C) $ 569,997.8 (D) $ 164,188.9 (A+B) $ 22,913.0 (T) . $ 757,099.8 Mm I mum bond;: amount Is $1000. BOND• AMOUNT REQUIRED AT RECORDING OR TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY - (E) _$'---~~~~~ Tx 0.30 $ 227,129.9 OR (T-E) $ 757,099.8 Use larger of l x'Jo% or ( 1-E) Date: • NOTE: The word "bond• as used in this document means any financial guarantee acceptable to King County. -NOTE: KCC 27 A f!IUthorlzes right of way and site restoration bonds to be combined when both ~re required. PUBLIC ROAD & DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE/DEFECT BOND• (B+C) x 0.25 = $ 143,225.1 The restoration requirement shall include the total cost for all TESC as a minimum, not a maximum. In addition, corrective work, both on-and off-site needs to be inciUded. Quantities shall reflect worse case scenarios not just minimum requirements. For exaniple, if a salmonid stream may be damaged, some estimated costs for restoration needs ~ be reflected In this amount. The 30% contingency and mobilization costs are computed in this quantity. -NOTE: Per KCC 27 A, total bond amounts remaining after reduction shall not be less than 30% of the original amount (T) or as revised by major design changes. SURETY BOND RIDER NOTE: tt a bond rider Is used, minimum additional pertormance bond shall be .~ ! $ 734,186.7 ((C+D)-E REQUIRED BOND 0 AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND MODIFICATION BY DOES Page 9 of9 04120BQWpees.xls Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 4/22/02 Report Date: 05/14/2008 , 05P0007 Steve Townsend DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 February 21, 2007 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER REPORT AND DECISION KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 400 Yesler Way, Room 404 Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 296-4660 Facsimile (206) 296-1654 Email: hearex@metrokc.gov SUBJECT: Department of Development and Environmental Services File No. L05P0007 Proposed Ordinance No. 2007-0050 Location: Applicant: TALBOT RIDGE ESTATES Preliminary Plat Application At the southwestern corner of the I 02nd Avenue Southeast and Southeast 192nd Street intersection, Renton Belmont Homes, Inc. represented by Cliff Williams P.O. Box 2401 Kirkland, Washington 98083-2401 Telephone: (425) 893-8478 King County: Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES) represented by Trisbab Bull · 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055 Telephone: (206) 296-6758 Facsimile: (206) 296-7051 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS/DECISION: Department's Preliminary Reconunendation: Department's Final Reconunendation: Examiner's Decision: EXAMINER PROCEEDINGS: Hearing Opened: Hearing Closed: Approve subject to conditions Approve subject to revised conditions Approve subject to revised conditions January 30, 2007 January 30, 2007 Participants at the public hearing and the exhibits offered and entered are listed in the attached minutes. A verbatim recording of the hearing is available in the office of the King County Hearing Examiner. C • L05P0007 -Talbot Ridge Estates Page 2 ofl2 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: I. General Information: Owner/Developer: Engineer: STR: Location: Zoning: Acreage: Number of Lots: Density: Lot Size: Proposed Use: Sewage Disposal: Water Supply: Fire District: School District: Robert Wenzl Belmont Homes, Inc. PO Box 2401 Kirkland, WA 98083-240 I 425-893-8478 Core Design 14711 NE 291h Place, #IOI Bellevue, WA 98007 425-885-7877 NW 5-22-5 The property is located at the southwest comer of the I 0200 Avenue SE and SE 192"• Street intersection. R-6-SO 4.36 27 6.2 units per acre Ranges from approximately 3,200 to 5,850 square feet Single-family detached dwellings Soos Creek Water and Sewer District Soos Creek Water and Sewer District King County District No. 37 Kent School District No. 415 Application completeness date: March 24, 2005 2. Except as modified herein, the facts set forth in the DOES reports to the Examiner and the ODES and King County Department of Transportation (KCDOT) testimony are found to be correct and are incorporated herein by reference. 3. The subject property is a near-rectangular parcel, 4.3 acres in area, located in the unincorporated County just south of the Renton city limits, in the southwest comer of the intersection of 102nd Avenue Southeast and Southeast 192nd Street (aka South 55th Street in the City of Renton street grid system). The property is located in the Springbrook Creek tributary area of the Black River sub-basin of the Lower Green River basin. The site terrain consists of a descent to the west from the I 02nd Avenue Southeast frontage; the descent begins with gentle grades and becomes increasingly steep toward the west property line, although in the northwest comer of the site the L05P0007 -Talbot Ridge Estates Page 3 of 12 slopes remain moderate. The site is mostly wooded with a second and third-growth mix of coniferous and deciduous trees native to the Pacific Northwest. Second-story vegetation and groundcover consists of typical Northwest native species. No defined critical areas such as streams, wetlands, and landslide or erosion hazard areas are found on the site or in close proximity. The property is undeveloped structurally. The surroundings of the site are developed with single-family residences. 4. Applicant Belmont Homes, Inc., proposed subdivision of the property into 27 Jots for detached single-family dwellings, as well as separate tracts for recreation/open space and drainage detention, and for three private lot access tracts. The development will provide onsite recreation facilities consisting of a recreation area with a tot lot, sport court and play equipment, and pedestrian trails. Public road access would be provided by the extension of a cul-de-sac road due westerly from I 02nd Avenue Southeast to terminate in the west central portion of the site with an offset bulb. No direct vehicular access would be provided to fronting roads; the King County Road Standards (KCRS) require that lot access be taken from the most minor road frontages of a Jot, which in this case will require that access for Lots 1, 18 and 24-27 be taken from either the internal cul-de-sac road or the pertinent private road access tract, not directly from I 02nd Avenue Southeast or Southeast 192nd Street. 5. The lot density would be approximately 6.2 units per acre, slightly above the basic six units per acre normally permitted under the assigned R-6 zoning of the property through the authorized use of two dwelling unit density credits transferred pursuant to the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) provisions of Chapter 21A.37 KCC. 6. The current property drainage consists of sheetflow overland to the west boundary, downslope from the property's road frontage on 102nd Avenue Southeast. The proposed stormwater management plan is to collect the sheetflow and divert it from its natural outlets toward Southeast 192nd Street to a drainage detention vault in the northwest comer of the site. The release from the detention vault will be subject to the Conservation flow control limits and Basic water quality requirements of the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), and will be conveyed in roadside ditching westerly along Southeast 192nd Street down to Springbrook Creek. A stormwater adjustment has been granted under file L05V006 l for the drainage diversion from its natural sheetflow off the property. 7. Due to the onsite soils, the development will be subject to stringent geotechnical review conditions. 8. Traffic impacts of the proposed development will be adequately mitigated under applicable County code requirements as proposed. The development has been granted a traffic Certificate of Concurrency under Chapter 14. 70 KCC. The development is also subject to the standard collection of MPS mitigation fee payments under Chapter 14.75 KCC, which apply to each dwelling unit. No intersection-standard mitigation under Chapter 14.80 KCC is required given the traffic levels generated by the development and the absence of High Accident Locations (HAL) affected by the development's traffic. Sight distance improvements are needed for the intersection of Southeast 192nd Street and I 02nd Avenue Southeast, affected by the development's traffic. A road standards variance has been granted under file L05V0066 for the intersection, which variance still requires significant frontage improvements along Southeast 192nd Street beyond the standard curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements, including road r • L05P0007 -Talbot Ridge Estates Page 4 of 12 widening and reconfiguration of the road geometry, including lowering of the road surface and superelevation of the curvature to better meet the design speed standards for the roadway. 9. The development's resident public schoolchildren will be bused to their respective schools from a bus stop at the southeast comer of the Southeast 192nd Street/I 02nd Avenue Southeast intersection. The internal road/walkway improvements and the frontage improvements on I 02nd Avenue Southeast will provide safe walking conditions to the bus stop area, which is graveled and sufficient for pedestrian safety while children wait for their school buses. 10. The King County Fire Marshal has recently instituted a more assertive program of fire suppression rules applied to development, wherein if road widths are provided as narrow as the 1993 KCRS perrnit as minimums, then individual structures may be subject to individual fire sprinkling requirements at the residential building permit stage. The matter is therefore left to post-preliminary plat consideration by the Applicant in deliberating the relative viability of those alternatives, and any agreements which may ensue from discussions with the appropriate fire officials. The Applicant in this case is contemplating providing increased road widths, which can be accommodated within the development without significant changes to the basic Jot layouts. 11. Former Chapter 2 IA.38 KCC's special overlay requirement S0-220 (Significant Tree Overlay) applies to the property. The Significant Tree Overlay standards require the development to retain a percentage of the significant trees onsite. To implement former KCC 21A.38.230, a detailed tree retention plan must be submitted with the engineering plans for the subdivision. 12. Neighboring and nearby property owners expressed concern about the legitimacy of the established R-6 zoning of the area. The Examiner is without authority to revisit the zoning, which apparently was imposed on a legislative basis in the mid-1990's to implement the Growth Management Act (GMA) when the subject area was included within the Urban Growth Area (UGA). (Despite an assertion that the subject area is a "rural" area, it is within an area undergoing urbanization within the UGA pursuant to the GMA.) Concern was also expressed regarding the maintenance of wildlife travel corridors in the area and the potential for urban development to block off such travel corridors, limiting wildlife choices and diverting wildlife travel down into the erosion-sensitive Springbrook Creek corridor. The subject property is not designated as significant wildlife habitat or a wildlife migration corridor, and there is no regulatory means of preserving any wildlife corridor onsite. The Examiner notes, however, that the western 20 percent of the site, approximately, will be preserved as unfenced open space through which wildlife could travel. 13. The City of Renton requests that the development be required to be improved under City of Renton development standards, given the potential for the property's annexation into the City. Given the absence of a pertinent Interlocal Agreement {ILA) which calls for the County to do so, the County is without authority to impose City of Renton development standards in the instant case. L05P0007 -Talbot Ridge Estates Page 5 of 12 CONCLUSIONS: I. The proposed subdivision, as conditioned below, would conform to applicable land use controls. In particular, the proposed type of development and overall density are specifically permitted under the R-6-SO zone. 2. If approved subject to the conditions below, the proposed subdivision will make appropriate provisions for the topical items enumerated within RCW 58.17.110, and will serve the public health, safety and welfare, and the public use and interest. 3. The conditions for final plat approval set forth below are reasonable requirements and in the public interest. 4. The dedications ofland or easements within and adjacent to the proposed plat, as shown on the revised preliminary plat submitted on August 24, 2005, or as required for final plat approval, are reasonable and necessary as a direct result of the development of this proposed plat, and are proportionate to the impacts of the development. DECISION: The preliminary plat of the Talbot Ridge Estates subdivision, as revised and received August 24, 2005, is approved subject to the following conditions of approval: I. Compliance with all platting provisions of Title 19A of the King County Code. 2. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final plat a dedication which includes the language set forth in King County Council Motion No. 5952. 3. The plat shall comply with the density requirements of the R-6-SO zone classification. All lots shall meet the minimum dimensional requirements of the R-6-SO zone classification or shall be as shown on the face of the approved preliminary plat, whichever is larger, except that minor revisions to the plat which do not result in substantial changes may be approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environmental Services. 4. The applicant shall provide the TDR certificate with the submittal of the engineering plans and the final plat. If the TDR certificate cannot be obtained, the applicant shall redesign the number oflots based upon the allowable density. This will result in the reconfiguration and loss oflots. 5. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads shall be done in accordance with the King County Road Standards established and adopted by Ordinance No. 11187, as amended (1993 KCRS). 6. The applicant shall obtain documentation by the King County Fire Protection Engineer certifying compliance with the fire flow standards of Chapter 17.08 of the King County Code. • L05P0007 -Talbot Ridge Estates Page 6 ofl2 7. Final plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots as shown on the approved preliminary plat. Preliminary review has identified the following conditions of approval which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9.04 and the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) must also be satisfied during engineering and final review. a. Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual and applicable updates adopted by King County. DDES approval of the drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction. b. Current standard plan notes and ESC notes, as established by DDES Engineering Review, shall be shown on the engineering plans. c. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: "All building downspouts, footing drains, and drains from all impervious surfaces such as patios and driveways shall be connected to the permanent storm drain outlet as shown on the approved construction drawings# on file with DDES and/or the King County Department of Transportation. This plan shall be submitted with the application of any building permit. All connections of the drains must be constructed and approved prior to the final building inspection approval. For those lots that are designated for individual lot infiltration systems, the systems shall be constructed at the time of the building permit and shall comply with plans on file." d. The stormwater facilities for this site shall be designed to meet at a minimum the Conservation Flow Control and Basic Water Quality requirements in the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). A Surface Water Drainage Adjustment {L05V0061) is approved for this site. All conditions of approval for this adjustment shall be met prior to approval of the engineering plans. e. To implement the required Best Management Practices (BMP's) for treatment of storm water, the final engineering plans and technical information report {TIR) shall clearly demonstrate compliance with all applicable design standards. The requirements for best management practices are outlined in Chapter 5 of the 2005 KCSWDM. The design engineer shall address the applicable requirements on the final engineering plans and provide all necessary documents for implementation. The final recorded plat shall include all required covenants, easements, notes, and other details to implement the required BMP's for site development. 8. The applicant's geotechnical engineer shall provide recommendations for the design and construction of the road, on site grading and compaction, drainage detention vault, and any required retaining walls. The geotechnical recommendations shall be included in the TIR and incorporated into the design with submittal of the engineering plans. L05P0007 -Talbot Ridge Estates Page 7 of 12 9. Special geotechnical construction inspection of the road improvements, onsite grading and compaction, drainage detention vault, and any required retaining walls is required to ensure compliance with the geotechnical recommendations. Daily inspection reports shall be submitted to the assigned Land Use Inspector during the construction phases of those facilities. A final construction report shall be submitted verifying compliance with the geotechnical recommendations. Notes requiring the above shall be shown on the engineering plans. 10. Geotechnical engineer review of the future home foundation construction is required. Notes to this effect shall be shown on the engineering plans and the final plat. 11. The proposed subdivision shall comply with the 1993 King County Road Standards (KCRS) including the following requirements: a. Road A shall be improved at a minimum to the urban subaccess street standard, with a cul-de-sac at the west end. If Road A is improved with only a 24-foot roadway width, then it shall be signed "No Parking" on both sides of the road. b. FRONT AGE: The frontage along I 02•• Ave SE shall be improved at a minimum to the urban neighborhood collector street standard (west side). The design shall require compliance with Section 4.01(1) of the KCRS; asphalt overlay when widening. c. FRONT AGE: The frontage along SE 192nd Street shall be widened and lowered, as approved by DDES and in compliance with the conditions of approval for Road Variance L05V0066. The frontage shall be widened to the urban neighborhood collector standard on the south side. The road lowering is required to improve the entering and stopping sight distance at the SE 192•• Street/102nd Ave SE intersection. Details of this improvement shall be shown on the engineering plans and routed to KCDOT for approval. d. The proposed private access tract and joint use driveways shall comply with Sections 2.09 and 3.01 of the KCRS, unless otherwise approved by DDES. These tracts shall be owned and maintained by the lot owners served. Notes to this effect shall be showed on the engineering plans and the final plat. e. Modifications to the above road conditions may be considered according to the variance provisions in Section 1.08 of the KCRS. 12. All utilities within proposed rights-of-way must be included within a franchise approved by the King County Council prior to final plat recording. 13. The applicant or subsequent owner shall comply with King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as determined by the applicable·fee ordinance. The applicant has the option to either: (I) pay the MPS fee at final plat recording, or (2) pay the MPS fee at the time of building permit issuance. If the first option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of plat application and a note shall be placed on the face of the plat that reads, "All fees required by King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), have been paid." If the second option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of building permit application. • L05P0007 -Talbot Ridge Estates Page 8 of 12 14. Lots within this subdivision are subject to King County Code 21A.43, which imposes impact fees to fund school system improvements needed to serve new development. As a condition of final approval, fifty percent (50%) of the impact fees due for the plat shall be assessed and collected immediately prior to recording, using the fee schedules in effect when the plat receives final approval. The balance of the assessed fee shall be allocated evenly to the dwelling units in the plat and shall be collected prior to building permit issuance. 15. The planter islands (if any) within the cul-de-sacs shall be maintained by the abutting lot owners or homeowners association. This shall be stated on the face of the final plat. 16. Suitable recreation space shall be provided consistent with the requirements ofKCC 21A.14.180 and KCC 21A.14.190 (i.e., sport court[s], children's play equipment, picnic table[s], benches, etc.). a. A detailed recreation space plan (i.e., area calculations, dimensions, landscape specifications, equipment specifications, etc.) shall be submitted for review and approval by DDES and King County Parks prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the engineering plan. This plan must not conflict with the Significant Tree Inventory & Mitigation Plan. b. A performance bond for recreation space improvements shall be posted prior to recording of the plat. 17. A homeowners' association or other workable organization shall be established to the satisfaction ofDDES which provides for the ownership and continued maintenance of the recreation, open space and/or sensitive area tract(s). 18. Street trees shall be provided as follows (per KCRS 5.03 and KCC 2 IA.16.050): a. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all roads. Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. b. Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Drawing No. 5-009 of the 1993 King County Road Standards, unless King County Department of Transportation determines that trees should not be located in the street right-of-way. c. If King County determines that the required street trees should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line. d. The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners association or other workable organization unless the County has adopted a maintenance program. Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the face of the final recorded plat. e. The species of trees shall be approved by DOES if located within the right-of-way, and shall not include poplar, cottonwood, soft maples, gum, any fruit-bearing trees, or any L05P0007 -Talbot Ridge Estates Page 9 of 12 other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstruct sanitary or storm sewers, or that is not compatible with overhead utility lines. f. The applicant shall submit a street tree plan and bond quantity sheet for review and approval by DDES prior to engineering plan approval. g. The applicant shall contact Metro Service Planning at 684-1622 to determine if SE 192nd Street and/or 102•• Avenue SE are on a bus route. If SE 192nd Street and/or 102nd Avenue SE are a bus route, the street tree plan shall also be reviewed by Metro. h. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted prior to recording of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after DDES has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. 1. A landscape inspection fee shall also be submitted prior to plat recording. The inspection fee is subject to change based on the current County fees. 19. To implement S0-220 pursuant to former KCC 21A.38.230, a detailed tree retention plan shall be submitted with the engineering plans for the subject plat. The tree retention and engineering plans shall be consistent with the requirements of S0-220. No clearing of the site is permitted until the tree retention plan is approved by DDES. Flagging and temporary fencing of trees to be retained shall be provided, consistent with S0-220. The placement of impervious surfaces, fill material, excavation work, or the storage of construction materials is prohibited with the fenced areas around preserved trees, except as may be permitted under the provisions of S0-220. A note shall be placed on the final plat indicating that the trees shown to be retained on the tree retention plan shall be maintained by the future owners of the proposed lots, consistent with KCC 21 A.38.230(B)( 6). The tree retention plan shall be included as part of the final engineering plans for the subject plat. 20. In the event that any archaeological objects are uncovered on the site, the applicant shall comply with RCW Chapter 27.53, Archaeological Sites and Resources. Immediate notification and consultation with the State Office of Archaeology and Historical Preservation, King County Office of Cultural Resources and relevant tribes (including the Suquamish, Puyallup and Muckleshoot tribes) is required if discovered materials are prehistoric and a site is present. 21. All future residences constructed within this subdivision are required to be sprinkled NFP A I 3D unless the requirement is removed by the King County Fire Marshal or his/her designee. The Fire Code requires all portions of the exterior walls of structures to be within 150 feet (as a person would walk via an approved route around the building) from a minimum 20-foot wide, unobstructed driving surface. To qualify for removal of the sprinkler requirement driving surfaces between curbs must be a minimum of 28 feet in width when parking is allowed on one side of the roadway, and at least 36 feet in width when parking is permitted on both sides. L05P0007 -Talbot Ridge Estates Page 10 of 12 Additionally, minimum 20-foot wide driving surfaces must be provided on Tracts A and B, and the driveway serving Lot 11; or residences constructed on Lot 11, and Lots 16 through 19 and 23 through 26 will have to be sprinkled. ORDERED February 21, 2007. Peter T. Donahue King County Hearing Examiner TRANSMTITED February 21, 2007 to the following parties and interested persons ofrecord: Robert E. Burton City of Renton Core Design 19226 -I 02nd Ave. SE Attn: Rebecca Lind Attn: Robert Stevens Renton WA 98055 I 055 S. Grady Way 14711 NE 29th Pl., #IOI Renton WA 98057 Bellevue WA 98007 Kathy Doman Patrick M. Hanis John Hicks 22724 -156th Ave. SE Hanis Greaney PLLC I 0313 SE 192nd St. Kent WA 98042 6703 S 234th St., #300 Renton WA 98055 Kent WA 98032-2900 Belmont Homes, Inc. Lozier Homes, Corp. Roger & Linda McDonald Attn: CliffWilliams Attn: Jennifer McCall 10033 SE 192nd St. P.O. Box 2401 1203 -I 14th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Kirkland WA 98083-240 I Bellevue WA 98004 Lt. Larry Rabel John W. Ruth Jerry Schmelzer Fire District. #37 19406 -I 02nd Ave. SE 19218-IOZndAve. SE 24611 -I 16th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Kent WA 98030 Harchand Raur Angrej Singh Mark Tullis Wayne & Jane Uyeta 19225 -I 02nd Ave. SE 10215 SE 192nd St. 19220 -I 02nd Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Bob Wenzl Virginia Zemeck Trishah Bull Belmont Homes 19250 99th Pl. S DDES/LUSD P.O. Box 2401 Renton WA 98055 MS OAK-DE-0100 Kirkland WA 98083 Kim Claussen Lisa Dinsmore Nick Gillen DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 L05P0007 -Talbot Ridge Estates Shirley Goll Kristen Langley DDES/LUSD Page 11 ofl2 Steve Townsend DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 Larry West DDES/LUSD Bruce Whittaker DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL In order to appeal the decision of the Examiner, written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the King County Council with a fee of $250.00 (check payable to King County Office of Finance) on or before March 7, 2007. If a notice of appeal is filed, the original and six (6) copies of a written appeal statement specifying the basis for the appeal and argument in support of the appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the King County Council on or before March 14, 2007. Appeal statements may refer only to facts contained in the hearing record; new facts may not be presented on appeal. Filing requires actual delivery to the Office of the Clerk of the Council, Room 1025, King County Courthouse, 516 3n1 Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104, prior to the close ofbusiness (4:30 p.m.) on the date due. Prior mailing is not sufficient if actual receipt by the Clerk does not occur within the applicable time period. The Examiner does not have authority to extend the time period unless the Office of the Clerk is not open on the specified closing date, in which event delivery prior to the close of business on the next business day is sufficient to meet the filing requirement. If a written notice of appeal and filing fee are not filed within fourteen ( 14) calendar days of the date of this report, or if a written appeal statement and argument are not filed within twenty-one (21) calendar days of the date of this report, the decision of the hearing examiner contained herein shall be the final decision of King County without the need for further action by the Council. MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 30, 2007, PUBLIC HEARING ON DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FILE NO. L05P0007. Peter T. Donahue was the Hearing Examiner in this matter. Participating in the hearing were Trishah Bull, Bruce Whittaker and Kristen Langley representing the Department; Cliff Williams and Robert Stevenson representing the Applicant, and Robert Burton. The following Exhibits were offered and entered into the record: Exhibit No. I Exhibit No. 2 Exhibit No. 3 Exhibit No. 4 Exhibit No. 5 Department of Development and Environmental Services file no. L05P0007 Department of Development and Environmental Services Preliminary Report, dated January 30, 2007 Application for Land Use Permits received March 24, 2005 SEPA Environmental checklist received March 24, 2004 SEPA Determination of Non-Significance issued January 12, 2007 C L05P0007 -Talbot Ridge Estates Page 12 of 12 Exhibit No. 6 Exhibit No. 7 Exhibit No. 8 Exhibit No. 9 Exhibit No. I OA !OB Exhibit No. 11 Exhibit No. 12 Exhibit No. 13 Exhibit No. 14 Exhibit No. 15 PTD:ms L05P0007 RPT Affidavit of Posting indicating a posting date of July 12, 2005; received by ODES on July 13, 2005 Preliminary plat map received August 24, 2005 (revised) Preliminary Storm Drainage Calculations and Level 1 Drainage Analysis by Core Design, received August 24, 2005 (revised) Preliminary Road & Grading Plan received August 24, 2005 (revised) Traffic hnpact Analysis by Mirai Traffic Engineering & Planning, received March 24, 2005, Traffic Analysis Addendum, received August 24, 2005 Geotechnical Engineering Study by GEO Group Northwest, Inc., received March 24, 2005 Approved KCSWDM Adjustment L05V006 I dated November 17, 2005 Approved KCRS Variance L05V0066 dated September 21, 2006 Revised Fire Engineering Conditions for File no. L05P0007 dated 1 /25/07 Additional recommendation no. 21 _o5P0007 Steve Townsend DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 400 Yesler Way, Room 404 Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 296-4660 Facsimile (206) 296-1654 Email: hearex@metrokc.gov January 16, 2007 NOTICE OF HEARING SUBJECT: Department of Development and Environmental Services File No. LOSP0007 Proposed Ordinance No. 2007-0050 Location: Applicant: TALBOT RIDGE ESTATES Preliminary Plat Application At the southwestern corner of the I 02nd Avenue Southeast and Southeast 192nd Street intersection, Renton Belmont Homes, Inc. P.O. Box 2401 Kirkland, Washington 98083-2401 Telephone: (425) 893-8478 King County: Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) represented by Trisbah Bull 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055 Telephone: (206) 296-6758 Facsimile: (206) 296-7051 A public hearing has been scheduled on these proposals for 9:30 a.m. on January 30, 2007, in the Department of Development and Environmental Services Hearing Room, 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW, Renton, Washington. Any primary party wishing to reschedule the hearing for a different time or location must make a request in writing to that effect and must obtain the written concurrence of all other primary parties, which shall be submitted to the Hearing Examiner's Office at the above address within seven (7) days of the date of this notice. Primary parties include the applicant, property owner, and responsible County agency. (Other persons likely to be directly and substantially affected by County action on this proposal may request "party" status by submitting an intervenor petition to the Hearing Examiner.) Agreement to reschedule this proceeding shall constitute waiver by the parties of procedural time limits for its occurrence. A pre-hearing conference may be requested by any primary party prior to January 22, 2007. Hearing Examiner Rule VIII, which is included with this notice, governs pre-hearing conferences. If you are a party to this proceeding and believe a pre-hearing conference should be held prior to the public hearing, submit your written request with specific reasons in support thereof to the King County Hearing Examiner. ------------------------------------------- L05P0007 -Talbot Ridge Estates Page 2 of3 To promote efficiency in the conduct of hearings and to eliminate surprise, pre-hearing exchange of information is encouraged by the Rules of Procedure. Any person is entitled to receive, at cost, copies of documents in the County file. Application may also be made to the Examiner to direct exchange of other . significant information by any person or agency. Mediation of disputes is available pursuant to King County Code Section 20.24.330 and Rules of Mediation. Please contact the Office of the Hearing Examiner if you need a copy of the Rules of Procedure or Rules of Mediation, or obtain the Rules by visiting our web site at www.metrokc.gov/mkcc/hearingexaminer. ORDERED January 16, 2007. Peter T. Donahue King County Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED January 16, 2007, to the following parties and interested persons: Robert E. Burton City of Renton Core Design 19226 -102nd Ave. SE Attn: Rebecca Lind Attn: Robert Stevens Renton WA 98055 1055 S. Grady Way 14711 NE 29th Pl., #101 Renton WA 98057 Bellevue WA 98007 Kathy Doman Patrick M. Hanis John Hicks 22724 -156th Ave. SE Hanis Greaney PLLC 10313 SE 192nd St. Kent WA 98042 6703 S 234th St., #300 Renton WA 98055 Kent WA 98032-2900 Lozier Homes, Corp. Roger & Linda McDonald Lt. Larry Rabel Attn: Jennifer McCall 10033 SE 192nd St. Fire District. #37 1203 -114th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 24611 -! 16th Ave. SE Bellevue WA 98004 Kent WA 98030 JohnW.Ruth Jerry Schmelzer Harchand Raur Angrej Singh 19406 -102nd Ave. SE 19218 -102nd Ave. SE 19225 -102nd Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Mark Tullis Wayne & Jane Uyeta Bob Wenzl 10215 SE 192nd St. 19220 -102nd Ave. SE Belmont Homes Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 P.O. Box 2401 Kirkland WA 98083 Virginia Zemeck Trishah Bull Kim Claussen 19250 99th Pl. S DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD Renton WA 98055 MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 Lisa Dinsmore Nick Gillen Shirley Goll DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 i .1 ,, L05P0007 -Talbot Ridge Estates Kristen Langley DDES/LUSD Steve Townsend DDES/LUSD Larry West DDES/LUSD Page 3 of3 MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 Bruce Whittaker DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 NOTE: If the Renton School District announces a district-wide school closµre due to adverse weather conditions or similar area emergency, the proceeding on this matter will be postponed. Parties of record will be notified of the time and date of the rescheduled proceeding. Any questions regarding postponements and rescheduling can be directed to the Hearing Examiner's Office at (206) 296-4660. Sign language and communication material in alternate formats can be arranged given sufficient notice at PTD:ms L05P0007 NOT Attachment 296-1000 (TDD number 296-1024). RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE KING COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER Rule VIII. PRE-HEARING CONFERENCES A. Pwpose and Initiation Pre-hearing conferences promote efficient case management by providing an informal process for early identification of issues and resolution of procedural matters in complex cases. Evidence generally will not be received at a pre-hearing conference, except when required in order for the examiner to rule on a motion. (Pre-marking and introduction of exhibits to which there is no objection may occur at the discretion of the examiner.) The examiner, on motion of any party or upon his/her own motion, may convene a pre-hearing conference to: I. Identify, clarify, limit or simplify issues. 2. Hear and consider pre-hearing motions. 3. Schedule hearings, identify parties and witnesses, determine the order of and limits upon testimony, obtain stipulations as to facts and law, identify and admit exhibits, order discovery, and consider and act upon any other matter which may aid in the efficient disposition of the hearing. B. Requests for Conference A motion to convene a pre-hearing conference shall be made to the examiner as soon as the need for a conference is recognized by the moving party ( at least 21 days prior to the scheduled hearing date), and shall state the reasons for the request, including any motions to be presented. For good cause stated in the motion, the examiner may consider a request that fails to meet the 21-day requirement. For hearings authorized under KCC 20.24.080, a motion by any party for a pre-hearing conference shall be granted if timely. However, unless consented to by all parties or otherwise ordered for good cause by the examiner, no pre-hearing conference on an appeal can be convened later than 45 days after receipt of the statement of appeal by the hearing examiner's office. C. Proceedings at Conference A party who has received timely notice of a pre-hearing conference shall identify at the conference any pre-hearing motions not previously made which he/she intends to make. Parties or interested persons may also file timely written pre-hearing motions for consideration at the pre-hearing conference. Failure to make or disclose a motion which was available to the party at the time of the conference may be grounds for its denial if subsequently made. D. Pre-hearing Order Following a pre-hearing conference, the examiner shall issue an order specifying all items determined at the conference. The order shall be binding upon all parties and interested persons who received timely notice of the conference. Revised March 31, 1995 .; - DIRECTIONS TO ODES HEARING ROOM 900 OAKESDALE AVE SW, RENTON SOUTHBOUND I-5 EXIT 157 -Martin Luther King Way Tum RIGHT onto 68"' Ave. S. 68'' Ave. S. becomes MONSTER RD. SW Monster Rd. turns into OAKESDALE AVE SW DDES is on your left (building 900) NORTHBOUND 1-5 EXIT I 54 to 1-405/W A-518/Burien/Renton Stay right to 1-405/Renton/Bellevue 1-405 EXIT I to WA-181/W. Valley Hwy. LEFT onto W. Valley Hwy/SR 181 RIGHT onto East Grady Way LEFT onto Oakesdale Ave. SW DDES is on your right (building 900) NORTHBOUND SR 167 Northbound under the 1-405 overpass · LEFT at SW 7"' St. (2"' light) LEFT onto Oakesdale Ave. SW DOES is on your left (building 900) SOUTHBOUND 1-405_ EXIT 2 to WA-167/Aubum/Rainier Ave. Follow to SR-167 (Valley Fwy.) north LEFT onto SW Grady Way RIGHT onto Oakesdale Ave. SW ODES is on your right (building 900) NORTHBOUND I-405 EXIT I to Interurban Ave. S/West Valley Hwy • LEFT at light at ramp bottom (north under (-405) RIGHT onto SW Grady Way LEFT onto Oakesdale Ave. SW ODES is on your right (building 900) SW 701 STREET SWGRAJJYW/..Y. -E s G:\working\M:isc\HexillDES directions.doc .,. ® DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT AL SERVICES LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER January 30, 2007 -PUBLIC HEARING AT 9:30AM DOES Hearing Room 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 Phone: (206) 296-6600 PROPOSED PLAT OF TALBOT RIDGE EST A TES FILE NO: L05P0007 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO: 2007-0050 A. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION: This is a request for a subdivision of 4.36 acres into 27 lots for the development of single-family detached dwellings in the R-6-SO zone. The proposed density is approximately 6.2 dwelling units per acre. The proposed lots range in size from approximately 3,200 to 5,850 square feet. Of the 27 lots, 2 lots are proposed under King County Code 21A.37, Transfer of Development Rights. See Attachment 1 for a copy of the proposed plat map. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: Owner/Developer: Robert Wenzl Belmont Homes, Inc. PO Box 2401 Engineer: STR: Kirkland, WA 98083-2401 425-893-8478 Core Design 14711 NE 29'h Place, #101 Bellevue, WA 98007 425-885-7877 NW 5-22-5 Location: The property is located at the southwest corner of the 102"d A venue SE and SE 192"d Street intersection. Zoning: R-6-SO Acreage: 4.36 Number of Lots: 27 Density: 6.2 units per acre Lot Size: Ranges from approximately 3,200 to 5,850 square feet Proposed Use: Single-family detached dwellings Sewage Disposal: Soos Creek Water and Sewer District Water Supply: Soos Creek Water and Sewer District Fire District: King County District #3 7 School District: Kent School District #415 Complete Application Date: March 24, 2005 Staffrpt/masters/PLATFMT.Oct 1997 TOWNSEND. STEVE LAND USE INSPECTIONS MS: OAK-DE· 0100 DDES / LUSD l.05P0007 C. D. E. (' HISTORY /BACKGROUND: The Subdivision Technical Committee (STC) of King County has conducted an on-site examination of the subject property. The STC has discussed the proposed development with the applicant to clarify technical details of the application, and to determine the compatibility of this project with applicable King County plans, codes, and other official documents regulating this development. As a result of preliminary discussions, the applicant presented the Technical Committee with a revised plat on August 24, 2005. The primary modifications include providing additional detail regarding the roads and grading of the site. THRESHOLD DETERMINATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE: Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A), RCW 43 .21 C, the responsible official of the Land Use Services Division (LUSD) issued a threshold determination of non-significance (DNS) for the proposed development on January 12, 2007. This determination was based on the review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent documents, resulting in the conclusion that the proposal would not cause probable significant adverse impacts on the environment. Therefore, an environmental impact statement (EIS) was not required prior to proceeding with the review process. Agencies, affected Native American tribes and the public were offered the opportunity to comment on or appeal the determination for 14 days. The DNS appeal deadline is January 29, 2007. AGENCIES CONT ACTED: I. King County Department of Natural Resources: No response. 2. King County Parks Department: No response. 3. King County Fire Protection Engineer: Fire protection engineering preliminary approval has been granted. 4. Kent School District #415: The comments from this district have been incorporated into this report. 5. Soos Creek Water & Sewer District (Sewer & Water): The comments from this district have been incorporated into this report. 6. Washington State Department of Ecology: No response. 7. Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife: No response. 8. Washington State Department of Natural Resources: No response. 9. Washington State Department of Transportation: No response. JO. . METRO: No response. 11. City of Renton: A Jetter from the City of Renton dated July 20, 2005 was received at DDES on July 25, 2005. The Jetter requests that improvements be installed to the City of Renton standards. F. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT: I. Topography: The site consists of gentle to steep west-facing slopes. The elevation ranges from approximately 408 feet at the east property line to 326 feet at the west property line. Moderate slopes are located at the northwestern comer of the site. Staffrpt/masters/PLATFMT.Nov99.doc clc 11/10/99 -2 - ... 2. · Soils: One surface soil is found on this site per King County Soil Survey, I 973. AgC -Alderwood gravely, sandy loam; 6-15% slopes. Runoff is slow to medium and the hazard of erosion is moderate. This soil has a moderate limitation for foundations, due to a seasonally high water table and slope. It has a severe limitation for septic tank filter fields due to very slow permeability in the substratum. 3. Wetland/streams: There were not any wetlands or streams found on the site. The Talbot Ridge subdivision is located in the Springbrook Creek tributary area, Black River subbasin of the Lower Green River basin. 4. Vegetation: This site is wooded with a second and third-growth mixture of coniferous and broad-leafed trees native to the Pacific Northwest. Second-story vegetation and groundcover consists of Northwest native species including salal, sword fern, berry vines, and grasses. 5. Wildlife: Small birds and animals undoubtedly inhabit this site; however, their population and species are limited due to nearby development. G. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERJSTICS: The property is bounded to the north by single-family residences and SE 192nd Street, I 02"'1 Avenue SE to the east, a single-family residence to the south, and single-family residences in the Plat of High Park Tracts to the west. The site is currently undeveloped. H. SUBDIVISION DESIGN FEATURES: I. Lot Pattern and Density: The zoning of the subject property is R-6-SO. The proposed subdivision appears to meet the density requirements, minimum lot width, and minimum lot area requirements of the R-6-SO zone. Of the 27 lots, 2 lots are proposed under KCC 21A.37, Transfer of Development Rights. The maximum density allowed for the R-6 zone, per KCC 2 IA.12.030, is 9 dwelling units per acre. This density may be achieved through the application of residential density incentives in KCC 2 IA.34 or transfer of development rights in 2 IA.37. As stated previously, the applicant is proposing 2 lots of the 27 lot proposal under KCC 21A.37. The proposal meets the requirements ofKCC 21A.37 because it is located in the R-6 zone and complies with the subject zoning code provisions, including dimensional and density requirements, of the R-6 zone. 2. Internal Circulation: The proposal will be served by an internal cul-de-sac, Road A, which will gain access off of 102nd A venue SE. Road A shall be improved at a minimum to the urban subaccess street standard, with a cul-de-sac at the west end. 3. Drainage: The Talbot Ridge subdivision is located in the Springbrook Creek tributary area, Black River subbasin of the Lower Green River basin. The site is subject to the Conservation (Level Two) flow control and Basic water quality requirements of the 2005 KCSWDM. The east-west oriented rectangular site slopes moderately from east to west. The western edge of the site contains slopes steep enough to prevent development. Sheetflow from the site then enters the backyards of the lots on the east side of 99th Place South, migrates through the lots and ends up on 99th Place South. The 99th Place South drainage system directs flows south and enters the Springbrook Park watershed area characteri.zed by very steep slopes and designated landslide and erosion hazard areas. Flow continues west through the watershed area until passing west via culvert under Talbot Road South. Flow continues northwest through the Springbrook Trout Farm, a designated wetland area and then crosses north under South 55th Street (the City ofRenton's designation for SE 192nd Street) and turns west to pass under Highway 167. Very little upstream flow enters the site. Staffrpt/masters/PLATFMT.Nov99.doc clc 11/10/99 -3 - The proposal is to collect most runoff from the project site and direct it to a single detention and water quality facility located near the northwest comer of the site just shy ( east) of the steep slope area. The allowed release would then be conveyed to the western property line that abuts the right-of-way and outlet to an open ditch. Flow would then enter a catch basin on the south side of SE 192nd Street and be diverted from its natural discharge location by crossing to the north side of the road. Drainage adjustment L05V0006 ! is approved to for the diversion. Drainage would continue west along the north side of SE 192nd Street. After crossing Talbot Road South, the diverted downstream path would realign with the original downstream path before reaching Highway 167. Nuisance flows to the abutting lots on the western property line would see sheetflow significantly reduced. There would be a reduction in flows through the landslide and erosion hazard areas of the Springbrook watershed. The Level One Drainage Analysis identified no restrictions or problems associated with the proposed discharge location. In fact, it is the natural discharge location that has experienced drainage complaints. Where flows enter the watershed area at the southern end of 99th Place South erosion has been reported. In addition, the downstream Trout Farm has experienced erosion problems from suspended sediments during new construction. The diverted path would help to reduce these occurrences. L TRANSPORTATION PLANS: J. I. Transportation Plans: The subject subdivision is not in conflict with the King County Transportation Plan, Regional Trail Plan, or Nonmotorized Transportation Plan 2. Subdivision Access: The subdivision will be served by an internal cul-de-sac which gains access off of 102"d A venue SE. 3. Traffic Generation: It is expected that approximately 270 vehicle trips per day will be generated with full development of the proposed subdivision. This calculation includes service vehicles (i.e., mail delivery, garbage pick-up, school bus) which may currently serve this neighborhood, as well as work trips, shopping, etc. 4. Adequacy of Arterial Roads: This proposal has been reviewed under the criteria in King County Code 14.70, Transportation Concurrency Management; 14.80, Intersection Standards; and King County Code 14.75; Mitigation Payment System. a. King County Code 14. 70 -Transportation Concurrency Management: The Transportation Certificate of Concurrency dated January 12, 2005, indicates that transportation improvements or strategies will be in place at the time of development, or that a financial commitment is in place to complete the improvements or strategies within six (6) years, according to RCW 36.70A.070(6). b. King County Code 14.80 -Intersection Standards: The existing arterial system will accommodate the increased traffic volume generated by this proposal. c. King County Code 14.75 -Mitigation Payment System: King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), requires the payment ofa traffic impact mitigation fee (MPS fee) and an administration fee for each single family residential lot or unit created. MPS fees are determined by the zone in which the site is located. This site is in Zone 343 per the MPS/Quartersection list. MPS fees may be paid at the time of final plat recording, or deferred until building permits are issued. The amount of the fee will be determined by the applicable fee ordinance at the time the fee is collected. PUBLIC SERVICES: I. Schools: This proposal has been reviewed under RCW 58.17.110 and King County Code 21 A.28 (School Adequacy). Staffrpt/masters/PLATFMT.Nov99.doc clc 11/10/99 • 4 - a. School Facilities: The subject subdivision will be served by Springbrook Elementary, Meeker Junior High, and Meeker Senior High Schools, all located within the Kent School District. b. School Capacity: The Kent School Board has adopted capacity figures which indicate their ability to accommodate additional students. c. School Impact Fees: Lots within this subdivision are subject to King County code 21 A.43, which imposes impact fees to fund school system improvements needed to serve new development. The current fee payment per lot is $4,775 per lot (per 2006 School Impact Fees). As a condition of final approval, fifty percent (50%) of the impact fees due for the plat shall be assessed and collected immediately prior to recording, using the fee schedules in effect when the plat receives final approval. The balance of the assessed fee shall be allocated evenly to the dwelling units in the plat and shall be collected prior to building permit issuance. d. School Access: The District has indicated that the future students from this subdivision will be bussed to Springbrook Elementary, Meeker Junior High, and Kentridge Senior High Schools. The bus stop for all schools is located at the southeast comer of 102"d Avenue SE and SE I92"d Street, across the street from the proposed development. Walkway conditions to the bus stop consist of sidewalks, within the proposed development and across the frontage, and gravel shoulders. 2. Parks and Recreation Space: The nearest public park is Boulevard Lane Park, located at SE 192nd Street and 124th Avenue SE. KCC 21A.14 requires subdivisions in the UR and R zone classifications to either provide on-site recreation space or pay a fee to the Parks Division for establishment and maintenance of neighborhood parks. At this time, the applicant is proposing to provide suitable recreation space. The Subdivision Technical Committee concurs with the applicant's proposal. KCC 2 IA.14.190 requires subdivisions to provide tot/children play areas within the recreation space on-site. The proposal · includes a play area, with a sport court and play equipment, and trails. The recreation space tract for this subdivision is combined with the drainage tract. Per KCC, 390 square feet of recreation space is required for each proposed lot, thus I 0,530 square feet are required for this proposal. The combined drainage and recreation tract is 42,164 square feet in size, half of which may be credited for recreation space credit per KCC 21.14.180. The recreation area is therefore adequate in size per code requirements. 3. Fire Protection: The Certificate of Water Availability from Soos Creek Water and Sewer District indicates that water is presently available to the site in sufficient quantity to satisfy King County Fire Flow Standards. Prior to final recording of the plat, the water service facilities must be reviewed and approved per King County Fire Flow Standards. This proposal is consistent with KCC 21 A.28.130 standards for adequate fire protection. This project is located within the urban growth area. In accordance with KCC 20.44.080, no unusual circumstances related to the site or proposal have been found that result in adverse environmental impacts relating to fire protection that are not addressed by applicable regulations. The project will provide a road system or fire lane that provides life safety/rescue access, and other fire protection requirements for buildings as required by KCC Title 17, Fire Code, and KCC Title 16, Building and Construction Standards. K. UTILITIES: 1. Sewage Disposal: The applicant proposes to serve the subject subdivision by means of a public sewer system managed by Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. A Certificate of Sewer Availability, dated March 22, 2005, indicates this sewer district's capability to serve the proposed development. Staffrpt/masters/PLATFMT.Nov99.doc clc 11/10/99 ~ 5 - 2. Water Supply: The applicant proposes to serve the subject subdivision with a public water supply and distribution system managed by Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. A Certificate of Water Availability, dated March 22, 2005, indicates this district's capability to serve the proposed development. L. COMPREHENSIVE AND COMMUNITY PLAN: M. N. I. Comprehensive Plan: This proposal is governed by the 2004 King County Comprehensive Plan which designates this area as Urban. 2. Community Plans: The subject subdivision is located in the Soos Creek Community Plan Area. CONCLUSIONS: The subject subdivision will comply with the goals and objectives of the King County Comprehensive Plan and will comply with the requirements of the Subdivision and Zoning Codes and other official land use controls of King County, based on the conditions for final plat approval. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the subject subdivision, revised and received August 24, 2005, be granted preliminary approval subject to the following conditions of final approval: I. Compliance with all platting provisions of Title 19Aofthe King County Code. 2. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final plat a dedication which includes the language set forth in King County Council Motion No. 5952. 3. The plat shall comply with the density requirements of the R-6-SO zone classification. All lots shall meet the minimum dimensional requirements of the R-6-SO zone classification or shall be as shown on the face of the approved preliminary plat, whichever is larger, except that minor revisions to the plat which do not result in substantial changes may be approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environmental Services. 4. The applicant shall provide the TDR certificate with the submittal of the engineering plans and the final plat. If the TDR certificate cannot be obtained, the applicant shall redesign the number oflots based upon the allowable density. This will result in the reconfiguration and loss of lots. 5. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads shall be done in accordance with the King County Road Standards established and adopted by Ordinance No. 11187, as amended {1993 KCRS). 6. The applicant must obtain the approval of the King County Fire Protection Engineer for the adequacy of the fire hydrant, water main, and fire flow standards of Chapter 17.08 of the King County Code. 7. Final plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots as shown on the preliminary approved plat. Preliminary review has identified the following conditions of approval which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9.04 and the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) must also be satisfied during engineering and final review. a. Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual and applicable updates adopted by King County. DDES approval of the drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction. b. Current standard plan notes and ESC notes, as established by DDES Engineering Review, shall be shown on the engineering plans. Staffrpt/masters/PLATFMT.Nov99.doc clc 11/10/99 -6 - c. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: All building downspouts, footing drains, and drains from all impervious surfaces such as patios and driveways shall be connected to the permanent storm drain outlet as shown on the approved construction drawings# on file with DOES and/or the King County Department of Transportation. This plan shall be submitted with the application of any building permit. All connections of the drains must be constructed and approved prior to the final building inspection approval. For those lots that are designated for individual lot infiltration systems, the systems shall be constructed at the time of the building permit and shall comply with plans on file." d. The stormwater facilities for this site shall be designed to meet at a minimum the Conservation Flow Control and Basic Water Quality requirements in the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). A Surface Water Drainage Adjustment (L05V0061) is approved for this site. All conditions of approval for this adjustment shall be met prior to approval of the engineering plans. e. To implement the required Best Management Practices (BMP's) for treatment of storm water, the final engineering plans and technical information report (TIR) shall clearly demonstrate compliance with all applicable design standards. The requirements for best management practices are outlined in Chapter 5 of the 2005 KCSWDM. The design engineer shall address the applicable requirements on the final engineering plans and provide all necessary documents for implementation. The final recorded plat shall include all required covenants, easements, notes, and other details to implement the required BMP's for site development. 8. The applicant geotechnical engineer shall provide recommendations for the design and construction of the road, onsite grading and compaction, drainage detention vault, and any required retaining walls. The geotechnical recommendations shall be included in the T.I.R. and incorporated into the design with submittal of the engineering plans. 9. Special geotechnical construction inspection of the road improvements, onsite grading and compaction, drainage detention vault, and any required retaining walls is required. Special construction inspection of the above construction elements is required to ensure compliance with the geotechnical recommendations. Daily inspection reports shall be submitted to the assigned Land Use Inspector during the construction phases of those facilities. A final construction report shall be submitted verifying compliance with the geotechnical recommendations. Notes requiring the above shall be shown on the engineering plans. 10. Geotechnical engineer review of the future home foundation construction is required. Notes to this effect shall be shown on the engineering plans and the final plat. 11. The proposed subdivision shall comply with the 1993 King County Road Standards (KCRS) including the following requirements: a. Road A shall be improved at a minimum to the urban subaccess street standard, with a cul-de-sac at the west end. b. FRONTAGE: The frontage along 102nd Ave SE shall be improved at a minimum to the urban neighborhood collector street standard (west side). The design shall require compliance with Section 4.0l(f) of the KCRS; asphalt overlay when widening. c. FRONT AGE: The frontage along SE 192nd Street shall be widened and lowered, as approved by ODES and in compliance with the conditions of approval for Road Variance L05V0066. The frontage shall be widened to the urban neighborhood collector standard on the south side. The road lowering is required to improve the entering and stopping sight distance at the SE ! 92"d Street/! 02"d Ave SE Staffrpt/masters/PLATFMT.Nov99.doc clc 11/10/99 -7 - C' intersection. Details of this improvement shall be shown on the engineering plans and routed to KCDOT for approval. d. The proposed private access tract and joint use driveways shall comply with Sections 2.09 and 3.01 of the KCRS. These tracts shall be owned and maintained by the lot owners served. Notes to this effect shall be showed on the engineering plans and the final plat. e. Modifications to the above road conditions may be considered according to the variance provisions in Section 1.08 of the KCRS. 12. All utilities within proposed rights-of-way must be included within a franchise approved by the King County Council prior to final plat recording. 13. The applicant or subsequent owner shall comply with King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as determined by the applicable fee ordinance. The applicant has the option to either: (!) pay the MPS fee at final plat recording, or (2) pay the MPS fee at the time of building permit issuance. If the first option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of plat application and a note shall be placed on the face of the plat that reads, "All fees required by King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), have been paid." If the second option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of building permit application. 14. Lots within this subdivision are subject to King County Code 21A.43, which imposes impact fees to fund school system improvements needed to serve new development. As a condition of final approval, fifty percent (50%) of the impact fees due for the plat shall be assessed and collected immediately prior to recording, using the fee schedules in effect when the plat receives final approval. The balance of the assessed fee shall be allocated evenly to the dwelling units in the plat and shall be collected prior to building permit issuance. 15. The planter islands (if any) within the cul-de-sacs shall be maintained by the abutting lot owners or homeowners association. This shall be stated on the face of the final plat. 16. Suitable recreation space shall be provided consistent with the requirements ofKCC 21A.I4.180 and KCC 21A.14.190 (i.e., sport court[s], children's play equipment, picnic table(s], benches, etc.). a. A detailed recreation space plan (i.e. area calculations, dimensions, landscape specifications, equipment specifications, etc.) shall be submitted for review and approval by ODES and King County Parks prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the engineering plan. This plan must not conflict with the Significant Tree Inventory & Mitigation Plan. b. A performance bond for recreation space improvements shall be posted prior to recording of the plat. 17. A homeowners' association or other workable organization shall be established to the satisfaction ofDDES which provides for the ownership and continued maintenance of the recreation, open space and/or sensitive area tract(s). I 8. Street trees shall be provided as follows (per KCRS 5.03 and KCC 2 IA.16.050): a. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all roads. Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. b. Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Drawing No. 5-009 of the 1993 King County Road Standards, unless King County Department of Transportation determines that trees should not be located in the street right-of-way. Staffrpt/masters/PLATFMT.Nov99.doc clc 11/10/99 -8 - 0. c. If King County determines that the required street trees should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line. d. The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners association or other workable organization unless the County has adopted a maintenance program. Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the face of the final recorded plat. e. The species of trees shall be approved by DDES iflocated within the right-of- way, and shall not include poplar, cottonwood, soft maples, gum, any fruit-bearing trees, or any other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstruct sanitary or storm sewers, or that is not compatible with overhead utility lines. f. The applicant shall submit a street tree plan and bond quantity sheet for review and approval by DDES prior to engineering plan approval. g. The applicant shall contact Metro Service Planning at 684-1622 to determine if SE 192nd Street and/or 102"d Avenue SE are on a bus route. If SE 192"d Street and/or 102"d Avenue SE are a bus route, the street tree plan shall also be reviewed by Metro. h. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted prior to recording of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after DDES has completed a second inspection and detennined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. 1. A landscape inspection fee shall also be submitted prior to plat recording. The inspection fee is subject to change based on the current County fees. 19. To implement S0-220, which applies to the site, a detailed tree retention plan shall be submitted with the engineering plans for the subject plat. The tree retention and engineering plans shall be consistent with the requirements of S0-220. No clearing of the site is permitted until the tree retention plan is approved by DDES. Flagging and temporary fencing of trees to be retained shall be provided, consistent with S0-220. The placement of impervious surfaces, fill material, excavation work, or the storage of construction materials is prohibited with the fenced areas around preserved trees, except as may be permitted under the provisions of S0-220. A note shall be placed on the final plat indicating that the trees shown to be retained on the tree retention plan shall be maintained by the future owners of the proposed lots, consistent with KCC 21A.38.23086. The tree retention plan shall be included as part of the final engineering plans for the subject plat. 20. In the event that any archaeological objects are uncovered on the site, the applicant shall comply with RCW Chapter 27.53, Archaeological Sites and Resources. Immediate notification and consultation with the State Office of Archaeology and Historical Preservation, King County Office of Cultural Resources and relevant tribes (including the Suquamish, Puyallup and Muckleshoot tribes) is required if discovered materials are prehistoric and a site is present. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: I. The subdivision shall conform to KCC 16.82 relating to grading on private property. 2. Development of the subject property may require registration with the Washington State Department of Licensing, Real Estate Division. St.affrpt/mascers/PLATFMT.Nov99.doc clc 11/10/99 -9 - C 3. Preliminary approval of this application does not limit the applicant's responsibility to obtain any required permit or license from the State or other regulatory body. This may include, but is not limited to the following: a. Forest Practice Permit from the Washington State Dept. of Natural Resources. b. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit from WSDOE. c. Water Quality Modification Permit from WSDOE. d. Water Quality Certification (401) Permit from U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers TRANSMITTED TO PARTIES LISTED HEREAFTER: King County Hearing Examiner BURTON ROBERT E 19226 102ND AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 ClTY OF RENTON REBECCA LIND EDNSP DEPT. 1055 S. GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 CORE DESIGN INC. ROBERT STEVENS 14711 NE 29TH PL. SUITE #101 BELLEVUE, WA 98007 DOMAN KA THY 22724 156TH A VE SE KENT WA 98042 HANIS, PA TRICK HANIS GREANEY PLLC 6703 S 234TH ST, STE 300 KENT WA 98032-2900 HICKS, JOHN 10313 SE 192ND ST RENTON WA 98055 KENT FIRE DISTRICT #37 LARRY RABEL 24611 116TH AVE SE KENT WA 98030 LOZIER HOMES CORPORATION JENNIFER MCCALL 1203 114 TH A VE SE BELLEVUE WA 98004 MCDONALD ROGER & LINDA 10033 SE 192ND ST. RENTON WA 98055 RUTH JOHN W. 19406 102ND AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 SCHMELZER JERRY 19218102ND AVESERENTONWA98055 SINGH HAR CHAND RAUR ANGREJ 19225 102ND A VE SE RENTON WA 98055 TULLIS, MARK L. 10215 SE 192ND ST. RENTON WA 98055 UYETA WAYNE&JANE 19220102NDAVESERENTONWA98055 WENZL, ROBERT BELMONT HOMES PO BOX 2401 KIRKLAND, WA 98083-2401 ZEMECK, MS. VIRGINIA M. 19250 99TH PLACE SOUTH RENTON WA 98055-6334 BULL, TRISHAH PROJECT MANAGER II DDES/LUSD CLAUSSEN, KIM PROGRAM MANAGER III DDES/LUSD DINSMORE, LISA CURRENT PLANNING SUPERVISOR DDES/LUSD GILLEN, NICK WETLAND REVIEW DDES/LUSD GOLL, SHIRLEY ASII DDES/LUSD LANGLEY, KRIS TRAFFIC ENGINEER DDES/LUSD ROGERS, CAROL CURRENT PLANNING SECTION DDES/LUSD TOWNSEND, STEVE LAND USE INSPECTIONS DDES / LUSD WEST, LARRY GEO REVIEW DDES/LUSD WHITING, KELLY KC DOT ROAD SERVICES DIVISION WHITT AKER, BRUCE SR. ENGINEER DDES/LUSD St.affrpt/rnasters/PLATFMT.Nov99.doc clc 11/10/99 • 10 - r )> Z::,; CJ::_ )> ~z C: 0? G) GO mo ,...., (J) 0 .. ~ me r-,,~' :oz r;:,~., <-, c, o-< (~"', rn (/) ~ e C)1 '"'e C 0 0 ~ ~ !£ OATE MARCH ZOO!i e k. /:I DESIGNED If_ CHEN ~ -< OR.O.""" u . .J. STEWART :;o m () P1 ·-<:: rri 0 I APPROVE;D M. OIEN ; k. ~ R.,.:a1.,7;~;~::£. ' J :a m < I ; • ' ' q !., ' ' PREUM/NARY PLAT TALBOT RIDGE ESTATES /BEL/MIO/VT IH/0/VITES P.a SOX 2401 Kl/tKLAND. WASHINGTON 9808J-:U01 I PAGE • • -· -~~ !~ ' l ' ~· ~· ;Gr h: • ~' • •· • .. ,, . •' i@ ' • f .... ,o •. !!!:! • • •. •. •. • q • !"' • ~ ' i.: 1 . ii' " o' ~ ( § .... ' : i I 11~ : ll ;ii ill I ;;;1, ' ' . ' , I ' ' 'fi. ' ' . ,, i r ' ' ' I/ ,1J' 'I , {! IS _;0t Ci " !I " I + •. l I ' I ' ' fNOIHfU!NG . , ANNINO. ,u,v,r,No / / / t02ND AVE. SIS. ' • • ® Date oflssuance: Project: Location: King County Department of Development and Environmental Services State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Determination of Non-Significance for LOSP0007 -Talbot Ridge Estates January 12, 2007 Subdivision of 4.36 acres into 27 lots for the development of single family detached residences in the R-6-SO zone. The proposed lots range in size from approximately 3,200 toS,850 square feet. Of the 27 lots, 2 lots are proposed under King County Code 21A.37, Transfer of Development Rights. The property is located at the southwest comer of the 1 02"d A venue SE and SE l 92"d Street intersection. King County Permits: Formal Plat (ODES File No. L05P0007) Trishah Bull, Planner SEPA Contact: Proponent: Zoning: Community Plan: Drainage Basin: Section/Township/Range: Notes: (206) 296-6758 Robert Wenzl Belmont Homes, Inc. PO Box 2401 Kirkland, WA 98083-2401 (425) 893-8478 R-6-SO Soos Creek Black River NW-5-22-5 A. This finding is based on review of the project site plan received August 24, 2005 (revised), environmental checklist received March 24, 2005, Level I Downstream Drainage Analysis received August 24, 2005 (revised), Traffic Impact Analysis received March 24, 2005 and Addendum received August 24, 2005, Geotechnical Engineering Study received March 24, 2005, approved Road Variance L05V0066, approved drainage ~djustment L05V006I,and other documents in the file. B. Issuance of this threshold determination does not constitute approval of the pennit. This proposal will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable King County codes which regulate development activities, including the Uniform Fire and Building Codes, Road Standards, Surface Water Design Manual, and the Critical Areas Regulations. IOWNSEND, STEVE LAND USE INSPECTIONS MS OAK -DE -0100 DDES / LUSD L05P0007 (', L05P0007 -Talbot Ridge bv,<1tes January 12, 2007 Page 2 Threshold Determination ' . • The responsible official finds that the above described proposal does not pose a probable significant adverse impact to the environment. This finding is made pursuant to RCW 43 .21 C, KCC 20.44 and WAC 197-11 after reviewing the environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency and considering mitigation measures which the agency or the applicant will implement as part of the proposal. The responsible official finds this infonnation reasonably sufficient to evaluate the environmental impact of this proposal. The lead agency has determined that the requirements for environmental analysis, protection, and mitigation measures have been adequately addressed in the development regulations and comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36. 70A RCW, and in other applicable local, state, or federal laws or rules, as provided by RCW 43.21C.240 and WAC 197-11-158. Our agency will not require any additional mitigation measures under SEPA. Comments and Appeals Written comments or any appeal of this threshold detennination must be received by King County's Land Use Services Division prior to 4:30 PM on January 29, 2007. Appeals must be accompanied by a nonrefundable filing fee. Please reference the file numbers when corresponding. Appeals must be in writing and state the perceived errors in the threshold determination, specific reasons why the determination should be reversed or modified, the harm the appellant will suffer if the threshold determination remains unchanged, and the desired outcome of the appeal. If the appellant is a group, the harm to any one or more members must be stated. Failure to meet these requirements may result in dismissal of the appeal. Comment/appeal deadline: Appeal filing fee: Address for comment/appeal: Responsible Official: 11~,!?t;~,p,~ism Current Planning Section Land Use Services Division Date Mailed: January 12, 2007 SEPA Determination.doc 7/27/99 clc 4:30 PM on January 29, 2007 $250 check or money order made out to the King County Office of Finance King County Land Use Services Division ATTN: Current Planning Section 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98057-5212 Notice of Decision- Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division SEPA Threshold Determination and Notice of Recommendation & Hearing 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057·5212 File No.: L05P0007 Project Name: Talbot Ridge Estates ODES Project Manager: Trishah Bull Telephone No.: 206-296-6758 Applicant: Project Location: Project Description: Permits Requested: Robert Wenzl Belmont Homes, Inc. PO Box 2401 Kirkland, WA 98083-2401 425-893-8478 The site is located at the southwestern corner of the 102"" Avenue SE and SE 192"" Street intersection. The postal city is Renton. Subdivision of approximately 4.36 acres into 27 lots for the development of single family detached residences in the R-6-SO zone. The proposed lots range in size from approximately 3,200 to 5,850 square feet. Of the 27 lots, 2 lots are proposed under King County Code 21A.37, Transfer of Development Rights. Formal Subdivision Department Recommendation to the Hearing Examiner: Approve, subject to conditions Date of Public Hearing: January 30, 2007, 9:30 am ODES Hearing Room -first floor 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98057-5212 SEPA Threshold Determination: Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) Issued January 12, 2007 The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) will issue a written report and recommendation to the Hearing Examiner two weeks prior to the scheduled public hearing. Persons wishing to receive a copy of the report should contact ODES at the address listed below. Following the close of the public hearing, the Hearing Examiner will issue a written decision which may be appealed to the Metropolitan-King County Council. Appeal procedures will be stated in the Examiner's written decision. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact the Project Manager at the phone number listed above. Written comments may also be submitted to ODES. A public hearing as required by law will be held to consider the approval of this application. If the Renton School District announces a district-wide school closure due to adverse weather conditions or similar area emergency, the public hearing on this matter will be postponed. Interested parties will be notified of the time and date of the rescheduled hearing. Any questions regarding postponements and rescheduling can be directed to the Hearing Examiner's Office at (206) 296-4660. CommenUAppeal Procedure on SEPA Threshold Determination: Comments on this SEPA determination are welcome. This SEPA determination may also be appealed in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner. A notice of appeal must be filed with the Land Use Services Division at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on January 29, 2007, and be accompanied with a filing fee of $250.00 payable to the King County Office of Finance. If a timely Notice of Appeal has been filed, the appellant shall also file a Statement of Appeal with the Land Use Services Division at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on February 5, 2007. The Statement of Appeal shall identify the decision being appealed (including the file number) and the alleged errors in that decision. Further, the Statement of Appeal shall state: 1) specific reasons why the decision should be reversed or modified; and 2) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the Statement of Appeal. Failure to timely file a Notice of Appeal, appeal fee or Statement of Appeal, deprives the Hearing Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Appeals must be submitted to the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DOES) at the following address: Date Mailed: January 12 1 2007 DDES--Land Use Services Division Attn: Permit Center 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 If you have any questions regarding the appeal procedures, please contact the Planner at the phone number listed above. If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, call (206) 296-6600 (voice) or (206) 296-7217 (TTY).