HomeMy WebLinkAboutJ_SESEA00218E_NIER_EME_221227.pdf
Radio Frequency Exposure
RF Safety and NIER Analysis Report
SITE-SPECIFIC-INFORMATION
Site Name SESEA00218E Multi-Licensee Facility ☐ YES ☒ NO
Street Address 207 Main Ave S Is Dish Wireless a Significant
Contributor to Co-Locator
Areas Requiring Mitigation?
☐ YES ☐ NO
☒ N/A City, State, Zip Renton, WA 98057
Dish Wireless’s Max
% MPE (Measured -
General Public)
Dish Wireless’s Max % MPE
(Predictive - General Public) 2719.41%
Structure Type Rooftop Assessment Date
Broadcast (AM/FM/TV)
Co-Locators ☐ YES ☒ NO Assessment Purpose NSB
Total Access Points TBD Total Report Revisions
Original Report Date 12/02/2022 Report Revision Date
Compliance Status
☐ COMPLIANT AS DESIGNED
☐ COMPLIANT PER RF SAFETY PLAN SUBMISSION
☒MITIGATION IS REQUIRED
Site Photo
Page 2 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
Table of Contents
1 Certification ................................................................................................................ 3
2 Executive Summary .................................................................................................... 3
2.1 Conclusion and Recommendations: ..................................................................... 5
3 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 6
3.1 Site Description: ................................................................................................... 6
3.2 Site Configuration Being Modeled: ..................................................................... 7
4 Predictive Analysis Details: ........................................................................................ 8
4.1 Analysis Locations: .............................................................................................. 8
4.2 Antenna Inventory: ............................................................................................... 9
4.3 RF Emissions Diagram(s) .................................................................................. 10
4.3.1 RF Emissions Diagram(s)- All Transmitters .............................................. 11
4.3.2 RF Emissions Diagram(s)- Dish Wireless Transmitters Only: .................. 19
5 Signage/ Barrier Detail ............................................................................................. 19
5.1 Signage/ Barrier Diagram................................................................................... 27
6 Conclusions and Recommendations: ........................................................................ 29
7 Appendix A: FCC Compliance and RF Safety Policies ........................................... 30
8 Appendix B: Overview of RoofMaster Functions and Assumptions .................... 33
9 References ................................................................................................................. 36
10 Limited Warranty ...................................................................................................... 37
Page 3 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
1 Certification
This report, prepared by Pramira, Inc. for Dish Wireless, is intended to document compliance
and evaluate power density levels as outlined in the report. The computations, analysis, and
resulting report and conclusions were based on applicable FCC guidelines and regulations for
maximum permissible exposure to humans consistent with FCC OET Bulletin 65, Edition 97-
01.
Additionally, Pramira, Inc. certifies that the assumptions are valid and that the data used
within Pramira' control are accurate, including information collected as part of Pramira’ field
surveys. Pramira, Inc. does not however certify the accuracy or correctness of any data
provided to Pramira, Inc. for this analysis and report by Dish Wireless or other third parties
working on behalf of Dish Wireless.
I certify that the attached RF exposure analysis and report is correct to the best of my
knowledge, and all calculations, assumptions and conclusions are based on generally
acceptable engineering practices:
_____________________________________________
Tim Alexander, P.E.
This compliance assessment and report has been prepared and reviewed by:
Preparer Reviewer
Name Ibrahim Ali Mike Arnold
Title RF Engineer Project Manager
Date 12/02/2022 12/02/2022
STATE O F WASHIN
G
TONREGI ST E R E DP R O F E S S I O N A L E N G I N E E RTIM A L E X ANDER
EXPIRES, 3 FEB 2024
SIGNED, 7 DEC 2022
57449
Tim Alexander, PE Digitally signed by Tim Alexander, PE
DN: cn=Tim Alexander, PE, o, ou,
email=proteuspower@outlook.com, c=US
Date: 2022.12.07 14:43:23 -07'00'
Page 4 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
2 Executive Summary
This report provides the results of an RF power density analysis performed for Dish Wireless
at site SESEA00218E in accordance with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
rules and regulations for RF emissions described in OET Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01.
This report addresses RF safety for two classified groups defined by OET Bulletin 65:
Occupational/ Controlled and General Population/ Uncontrolled. Based on the analysis, this
site will be Compliant with FCC rules and regulations and Dish Wireless ’s Signage and
Barrier Policy if the mitigation details provided in Table 1 are implemented.
Final Compliant
Configuration
GUIDELINES NOTICE CAUTION WARNING NOC INFO BARRIER/MARKER
Access Point(s) ☒ [TBD] * ☐ [ ] ☐ [ ] ☐ [ ] ☒ [TBD] * ☐
Alpha ☐ [ ] ☐ [ ] ☒ [3] ** ☐ [ ] ☐ [ ] ☒ 4’ x 5’ Marker
Beta ☐ [ ] ☐ [ ] ☒ [2] ** ☐ [ ] ☐ [ ] ☐
Gamma ☐ [ ] ☐ [ ] ☒ [3] ** ☐ [ ] ☐ [ ] ☒ 4’ x 12’ Marker
NOTE: The table represents either the signage/barriers installed / removed OR items
required by the market (if mitigation is not installed by consultant/vendor).
* These RF signs should be posted on any Access Point to the Main Roof. (See drawing in Section 5.2)
** These RF signs should be posted on the Marker and at the Back of all sectors. (See drawing in Section 5.2)
Specialty Sign Detail
Location N/A
Access Point N/A
Alpha N/A
Beta N/A
Gamma N/A
NOTE: The tables above represent EXISTING compliance items implemented at this location.
Notes/ Additional Compliance Requirements(s):
Mitigation is required per the Signage/ Barrier Diagram.
RF Safety Plan
Table 1: Mitigation Requirements for Compliance
Page 5 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
2.1 Conclusion and Recommendations:
The results of the analysis indicate that power density levels in the generally accessible
areas on the Upper Roof level will exceed the FCC’s MPE limit for General Population
and Occupational environments.
The results of the analysis indicate that power density levels in the generally accessible
areas on the Main Roof level will exceed the FCC’s MPE limit for General Population and
Occupational environments.
The results of the analysis indicate that power density levels in the generally accessible
areas on the Balcony level will not exceed the FCC’s MPE limit for General Population
environments.
The results of the analysis indicate that power density levels in the generally accessible
areas on the Ground level will not exceed the FCC’s MPE limit for General Population
environments.
The max theoretical % MPE is 2719.41% (FCC General Public) directly in front of the
antenna beams at the Main Roof Level.
NOC and Guidelines Signs need to be posted on any Access Point to the Main Roof.
This site will be operating in general compliance with FCC OET Bulletin 65 and Dish
Wireless ’s signage policy as the mitigation requirements outlined in the Executive
Summary are implemented. See Signage/Barrier Diagram section for further details on the
recommended signage placement locations.
Note: Modifications to the site; and/or increases in channel counts or power levels exceeding those listed in
this report will require additional evaluation to determine compliance.
Page 6 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
3 Introduction
The purpose of this analysis and report is to evaluate the cumulative power density levels
of all non-excluded antennas located on the site and identify any areas of concern that
require mitigation. This report also assesses the site’s compliance with FCC OET Bulletin
65; “Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio-frequency Electromagnetic Fields”.
3.1 Site Description:
Site Name: SESEA00218E
Street Address 207 Main Ave S
Renton, WA 98057
Latitude: 47.4808°
Longitude: -122.204331°
Structure Type Rooftop
Structure Height: 74.5’ AGL
BTS Equipment Location: The BTS Equipment is located on the Main Roof.
Co-Locators/ Other Antennas: N/A
Access: TBD
Page 7 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
3.2 Site Configuration Being Modeled:
This Rooftop application where Dish Wireless antennas are mounted to pipes on the Upper
Roof for Alpha sector and on the Main Roof for Beta and Gamma sectors.
This will be a Three-Sector site with one Active and two Future antennas in all sectors.
The values of the antennas rad center for Alpha sector (78.5’), antennas rad center for Beta
and Gamma sectors (69.1’), Upper Roof Height (74.5’), Main Roof Height (65.1’),
Balcony Height (53’), and Lower Roof Height (17’) are based on the CDs and Google
Earth. These values must be verified on the site audit for the post study.
Each sector supports 5GNR at 600, 700, 1900, 2100 MHz. All LTE supports MIMO.
All technologies were evaluated assuming the maximum number of channels and were
running at maximum power 100% of the time.
Page 8 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
4 Predictive Analysis Details:
For purposes of this analysis, RoofMaster® was configured to provide an output based on the
appropriate MPE limit(s) published in the FCC’s guidelines. The antenna information was
loaded into RoofMaster®, an MPE predictive analysis tool by Waterford Consultants, LLC.
4.1 Analysis Locations:
Number of Elevations Analyzed: 4
Upper Roof Level
Main Roof Level
Balcony Level
Ground Level
A study at the Lower Roof and Adjacent Roofs levels was not required as the study at
the Balcony level shows that the MPE limit is below the General Population MPE limit
on the Lower Roof and Adjacent Roofs levels.
Page 9 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
4.2 Antenna Inventory:
The following table shows all transmitting antennas and contains the technical data used to
simulate the power density that may be encountered with all antennas simultaneously
operating at full rated power with the exception of any excluded antennas cited in this
document. If Co-Locator antennas exist and the use of “Unknown” as an antenna model
that means the specific antenna details could not be secured, generic antennas, frequencies,
and Tx powers were used for modeling. The assumptions used are based on past experience
with communications carriers.
Z-height represents the distance from the nearest walking surface to the Centerline of the
antenna.
The antenna Z-heights listed above are referenced to Top of the Upper Roof, Main Roof, Balcony
and Ground Levels.
Table 2- Antenna Inventory
Page 10 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
4.3 RF Emissions Diagram(s)
The RF Emissions Diagram(s) display the Theoretical spatially averaged Maximum
Permissible Exposure (MPE) percentages that are expected for each study’s elevation for
Dish Wireless antennas and all other carrier antennas at the site.
General Population MPE limit is included to demonstrate where Dish Wireless is a
significant contributor to accessible areas where multiple carrier’s transmitters are present.
These diagrams use modeling as prescribed in OET Bulletin 65 and assumptions detailed
in Appendix A.
The keys at the bottom of each diagram indicates if percentages displayed are referenced
to Occupational Limit and FCC General Public Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE)
limits.
% of FCC General Public Exposure Limits
% of FCC Occupational Exposure Limits
Page 11 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
4.3.1 RF Emissions Diagram(s)- All Transmitters
Reference Plane: Upper Roof Level
The maximum theoretical % MPE of the General Population limits =2684.95%
Page 12 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
Reference Plane: Upper Roof Level
The maximum theoretical % MPE of the Occupational Limit =536.99%
Page 13 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
Reference Plane: Main Roof Level
The maximum theoretical % MPE of the General Population limits =2719.41%
Page 14 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
Reference Plane: Main Roof Level
The maximum theoretical % MPE of the Occupational Limit =543.88%
Page 15 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
Reference Plane: Balcony Level
The maximum theoretical % MPE of the General Population limits =10.48%
Page 16 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
Reference Plane: Balcony Level
The maximum theoretical % MPE of the Occupational Limit =2.1%
Page 17 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
Reference Plane: Ground Level
The maximum theoretical % MPE of the General Population limits =0.24%
Page 18 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
Reference Plane: Ground Level
The maximum theoretical % MPE of the Occupational Limit =0.05%
Page 19 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
4.3.2 RF Emissions Diagram(s)- Dish Wireless Transmitters Only:
Reference Plane: Upper Roof Level
The maximum theoretical % MPE of the General Population limits =2684.95%
Page 20 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
Reference Plane: Upper Roof Level
The maximum theoretical % MPE of the Occupational Limit =536.99%
Page 21 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
Reference Plane: Main Roof Level
The maximum theoretical % MPE of the General Population limits =2719.41%
Page 22 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
Reference Plane: Main Roof Level
The maximum theoretical % MPE of the Occupational Limit =543.88%
Page 23 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
Reference Plane: Balcony Level
The maximum theoretical % MPE of the General Population limits =10.48%
Page 24 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
Reference Plane: Balcony Level
The maximum theoretical % MPE of the Occupational Limit =2.1%
Page 25 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
Reference Plane: Ground Level
The maximum theoretical % MPE of the General Population limits =0.24%
Page 26 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
Reference Plane: Ground Level
The maximum theoretical % MPE of the Occupational Limit =0.05%
Page 27 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
5 Signage/ Barrier Detail
5.1 Signage/ Barrier Detail
Final Compliant
Configuration
GUIDELINES NOTICE CAUTION WARNING NOC INFO BARRIER/MARKER
Access Point(s) ☒ [TBD] * ☐ [ ] ☐ [ ] ☐ [ ] ☒ [TBD] * ☐
Alpha ☐ [ ] ☐ [ ] ☒ [3] ** ☐ [ ] ☐ [ ] ☒ 4’ x 5’ Marker
Beta ☐ [ ] ☐ [ ] ☒ [2] ** ☐ [ ] ☐ [ ] ☐
Gamma ☐ [ ] ☐ [ ] ☒ [3] ** ☐ [ ] ☐ [ ] ☒ 4’ x 12’ Marker
NOTE: The table represents either the signage/barriers installed / removed OR items
required by the market (if mitigation is not installed by consultant/vendor).
* These RF signs should be posted on any Access Point to the Main Roof. (See drawing in Section 5.2)
** These RF signs should be posted on the Marker and at the Back of all sectors. (See drawing in Section 5.2)
Specialty Sign Detail
Location N/A
Access Point N/A
Alpha N/A
Beta N/A
Gamma N/A
NOTE: The tables above represent EXISTING compliance items implemented at this location.
Notes/ Additional Compliance Requirements(s):
Mitigation is required per the Signage/ Barrier Diagram.
RF Safety Plan
Table 3: Mitigation Requirements for Compliance
Page 28 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
5.2 Signage/ Barrier Diagram
Page 29 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
6 Conclusions and Recommendations:
The results of the analysis indicate that power density levels in the generally accessible
areas on the Upper Roof level will exceed the FCC’s MPE limit for General Population
and Occupational environments.
The results of the analysis indicate that power density levels in the generally accessible
areas on the Main Roof level will exceed the FCC’s MPE limit for General Population and
Occupational environments.
The results of the analysis indicate that power density levels in the generally accessible
areas on the Balcony level will not exceed the FCC’s MPE limit for General Population
environments.
The results of the analysis indicate that power density levels in the generally accessible
areas on the Ground level will not exceed the FCC’s MPE limit for General Population
environments.
The max theoretical % MPE is 2719.41% (FCC General Public) directly in front of the
antenna beams at the Main Roof Level.
NOC and Guidelines Signs need to be posted on any Access Point to the Main Roof.
This site will be operating in general compliance with FCC OET Bulletin 65 and Dish
Wireless ’s signage policy as the mitigation requirements outlined in the Executive
Summary are implemented. See Signage/Barrier Diagram section for further details on the
recommended signage placement locations.
Note: Modifications to the site; and/or increases in channel counts or power levels exceeding those listed in
this report will require additional evaluation to determine compliance.
Page 30 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
7 Appendix A: FCC Compliance and RF Safety Policies
In August of 1997, the FCC published OET Bulletin 65 Edition 97-01 to regulate methods
for evaluating compliance with FCC guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency (RF)
electromagnetic fields. The FCC guidelines for human exposure to RF electromagnetic
fields incorporate two categories of limits; namely “Controlled” (a.k.a. Occupational) and
“Uncontrolled” (a.k.a. General Public). The guidelines offer suggested methods for
evaluating fixed RF transmitters to ensure that the controlled and uncontrolled limits
deemed safe by the FC for human exposure are not exceeded.
OET Bulletin 65 recommended guidelines are intended to allow an applicant to “make a
reasonably quick determination as to whether a proposed facility is in compliance with the
limits.” In addition, the guidelines offer alternate supplementary considerations and
procedures such as field measurements and more detailed analysis that should be used for
multiple emitter situations.
These guidelines define RF as emissions in the frequency range of 300 kHz to 100 GHz.
The FCC define Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits within this frequency range
based on limits recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection and
Measurement, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), and by the
American National Standards Institute (ANSI).
As shown in Table 1 of Appendix A, the averaging time for Occupational/Controlled
exposures is 6 minutes, while the averaging time for general population/uncontrolled
exposures is 30 minutes.
As an illustration of the application of time-averaging to Occupational/Controlled exposure
consider the following.
The relevant interval for time-averaging for Occupational/Controlled exposures is six
minutes. This means, for example, that during any given six-minute period a worker could
be exposed to two times the applicable power density limit for three minutes as long as he
or she were not exposed at all for the preceding or following three minutes. Similarly, a
worker could be exposed at three times the limit for two minutes as long as no exposure
occurs during the preceding or subsequent four minutes, and so forth.
Page 31 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
The specific MPE limits defined by the FCC are as follows:
Frequency
Range [MHz]
Electric Field
Strength (E) [V/m]
Magnetic Field
Strength (H) [A/m]
Power Density
(S) [mW/Cm^2]
Averaging Time |E|^2,
|H|^2 or S [minutes]
0.3 - 3.0 614 1.63 100* 6
3.0 - 30 1842/f 4.89/f 900/f^2* 6
30 - 300 61.4 0.163 1 6
300 - 1,500 - - f/300 6
1,500 - 100,000 --5 6
Frequency
Range [MHz]
Electric Field
Strength (E) [V/m]
Magnetic Field
Strength (H) [A/m]
Power Density
(S) [mW/Cm^2]
Averaging Time |E|^2,
|H|^2 or S [minutes]
0.3 - 3.0 614 1.63 100* 30
3.0 - 30 842/f 2.19/f 180/f^2* 30
30 - 300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30
300 - 1,500 - - f/1500 30
1,500 - 100,000 --1 30
f = frequency *Plane-wave equivalent power density
Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure
Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure
Table 1: The specific MPE limits defined by the FCC
The FCC states that “Occupational/ Controlled limits apply in situations in which persons
are exposed as a consequence of their employment provided those persons are fully aware
of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Limits for
Occupational/ Controlled exposure also apply in situations when an individual is transient
through a location where Occupational/ Controlled limits apply provided he or she is made
aware of the potential for exposure.”
For General Population/ Uncontrolled limits, the FCC states that “General Population/
Uncontrolled exposures apply in situations in which the general public may be exposed, or
in which persons that are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not fully be
aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure.”
For purposes of this analysis, all limits are evaluated against the Power Density limits.
Typical guidelines for determining whether Occupational/ Controlled limits can be applied
include ensuring the environment (such as a rooftop) as limited/controlled access via
locked doors or physical barrier that are preferably controlled by a landlord that is aware
of the situation and can inform anyone going through the locked door of the existence of
the RF emissions. Such notification/awareness is typically accomplished by means of
signage on the door, or other access to the area of concern, as well as signage on or near
the antennas. Examples of such signs include the following:
Page 32 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
Standards for when to use each of the above signs are as follows:
All MPE references are to the FCC Public limits.
All MPE references are to the FCC Occupational limits
No sign required: <100% of Public Limit MPE
Blue Sign, Notice: 100% to <500% of Public Limit MPE
Yellow Sign, Caution: 500% to <5000% of Public Limit MPE
Red Sign, Warning: ≥5000% of Public Limit MPE
No sign required: <20% of Occupational MPE
Blue Sign, Notice: 20% to <100% of MPE
Yellow Sign, Caution: 100% to <1000% of MPE
Red Sign, Warning: ≥1000% of MPE
Page 33 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
8 Appendix B: Overview of RoofMaster Functions and
Assumptions
RoofMaster is a RF Compliance software package designed to enable the analysis,
assessment and mitigation of communications sites with respect to human exposure to
radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.
RoofMaster was developed in 2008 by Waterford Consultants to support compliance
assessments performed at single and multi-operator wireless locations throughout North
America and has been in service since 2008. Real-world experience in evaluating
thousands of base station installations are reflected in the RoofMaster design approach.
This document provides a guide for creating simulations of RF hazard conditions through
the characterization of antenna systems and site features and through FCC-specified
computational analysis.
On any structure, one may encounter antennas installed by wireless service providers,
public safety and other FCC-licensed and unlicensed operators. Siting constraints have
resulted in diverse and complex environments accessible to people performing a variety
of activities around these antennas. RoofMaster supports the characterization of these
locations to convey important information regarding RF sources and accessible areas
necessary to evaluate the potential for human exposure to hazardous levels of RF
energy.
RoofMaster supports the depiction of communications sites through the display of
construction drawing or aerial photography image files as well as providing line drawing
tools. These representations are scalable to enable the modeling of any location.
RoofMaster utilizes a three-dimensional spatial framework consisting of a 1000 x 1000
grid with unlimited vertical dimensions necessary for the positioning of antennas and
modeling of RF conditions at each grid point throughout the space. Predictive analysis is
performed on a study plane at a specified elevation. The subsequent sections of this guide
provide the steps necessary to create a site representation and conduct these studies.
RoofMaster employs several power density prediction models based on the
computational approaches set forth in the Federal Communications Commission’s
Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency
Electromagnetic Fields, OET Bulletin 65. This guideline utilizes several antenna and
operational parameters in calculating the power density contributions from each emitter
at specified points throughout the study space. RoofMaster enables antennas to be fully
defined in site specific aspects as well as through the use of a library of manufacturer
data. The parameters include:
Page 34 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
§ Antenna model
§ Radiation patterns
§ Aperture length
§ Gain
§ Beamwidth
§ Antenna radiation center
§ Azimuth
§ Mechanical downtilt
§ Location
§ Frequency
§ Power into antenna
In OET-65, the Cylindrical Model is presented as an approach to determine the spatially
averaged power density in the near field directly in front of an antenna. In order to
implement this model in all directions, RoofMaster utilizes the antenna manufacturer
horizontal pattern data. Additionally, RoofMaster incorporates factors that reduce the
power density by the inverse square of horizontal and vertical distance beyond the near
field region.
Power density is calculated as follows:
S is the spatially averaged power density value
R is the horizontal distance meters to the study point
h is the aperture length in meters
Pin is power into the antenna input port in Watts
RoofMaster Implementation:
GH is gain offset to study point as specified in manufacturer horizontal pattern
Pin is adjusted by the portion of the antenna aperture in the 0-6 ft vertical study zone
Hr accounts for 1/R2 Far Field roll off which starts at 2*h
Vr accounts for 1/ (vertical distance) 2 roll off from antenna bottom to the top of the 0-6ft
study zone (or antenna top to bottom of 0-6ft study zone)
Page 35 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
Not to Scale
Page 36 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
9 References
FCC (1997). “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to
Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields”; Federal Communications Commission; Office
of Engineering and Technology, OET Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01, August.
Waterford Consultants, LLC. (2008). RoofMaster User Guide, Waterford
Consultants, LLC.
Page 37 of 37
Pramira, Inc · 2552 Walnut Ave., Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780 · 800.678.1169
10 Limited Warranty
Pramira, Inc. warrants that this analysis was performed in good faith using the
methodologies and assumptions covered in this report and that data used for the analysis
and report were obtained by Pramira, Inc. employees or representatives via site surveys or
research of Dish Wireless ’s available information. In the event that specific third-party
details were not available, best efforts were made to use assumptions that are based on
industry experience of various carriers’ standards without violating any confidential
information obtained under non-disclosure terms.
Pramira, Inc. also warrants that this analysis was performed in accordance with industry
acceptable standards and methods.
There are no other warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to, the implied
warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, relating to this agreement
or to the services rendered by Pramira hereunder. In no event shall Pramira be held liable
to Dish Wireless, or to any third party, for any indirect, special, incidental, or consequential
damages, including but not limited to loss of profits, loss of data, loss of good will, and
increased expenses. In no event shall Pramira be liable to Dish Wireless for damages,
whether based in contract, tort, negligence, strict liability, or otherwise, exceeding the
amount payable hereunder for the services giving rise to such liability.