HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA 09-125_7_Misci S
;r. LAL
RECORDING CHECKLIST
1) REDLINES ADDRESSED
P(?fes 2) OK TO RECORD; I ROUTED REQUEST TO RECORD
Ok 3) K.C. FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER
4) FINAL HEALTH (any restrictions?) wct cr o 1(C 7 fcw Rr �l�f � car tf V-Q� .�
off` 5) HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION (established)
fi} { 6) COVENENTS a) recording fee ($9.00 first page plus $1.00 each additional page)
Qk� 7) UPDATED PLAT CERTIFICATE (30days) o-,., g Alov, ,
o% 8)LOTSUMMARY CN PLAT
9) EXAMINERS REPORT CHECKED OFF
__b;.I0) REVIEW VARIANCES AND COMMENTS UNDER PROJECT NO.
_-4k __I 1) FEES AND ACTIVITIES
f 1)
9D M PS Z-ao�-)E 44-? -
Cvs�Z `(I
c� D —
Zoos:
�- z 4�
66 4-F 0 ifs
12) ` FINAL PLATTING PROCEDURE FORM C&) E1T
13) ADDRESSING ON PLAT
�! I >,CAT�c /v
_LL14) ENGINEERING PLANS REFERENCED ON PLAT
ok 15) ROAD MITIGATION a) PROPER NOTE b) FEES PAID �� ��� 1ql ��
_-6 k 16) SCHOOL MITIGATION a) PROPER NOTE b) FEES PAID
0((__] 7) PLAT RECORDING FEE �/ ? D
o k 18) BONDS
a) PERFORMANCE
b) WETLAND RESTORATION: PLAN BOND
c) L -PLAN / RECREATION: PLAN BOND
d) STREET TREE: PLAN BOND
A19) BUILDING PERMIT NOTE NEEDED?
,VIA 20) IF IN R-1 OR RA THEN VERIFY BASIN RE: KCC 21A.12,030 19.
—21) REQUEST ELECTRONIC COPY OF DRAWING FILE
LZ) /�€56Cv6. F15pv[ C w ITN �,Q[ it �L 1-r'0 A
D
a
S-- C 14FUK SGly� �0 %NC/y
Pl-
rJC
�A�
_
Lc
r bkr� t ir. �c via wr r oc_ u 1-- eK ;(,d ►l
Ise at� vl l ot7�o �. �S o E'1
=xr��
.�—
zc_
P'5C -rpv iC/
ex
%�O ✓Cu ajvl � .
T �/ C
//—
YL
2
�CK � P/'1
51fz. =5" (cA54c�U
a
DATE: February 25, 2005
King County PLAT NAME: SHAMROCK
D.D.E.S. FILE No.: L02P0014
Land Use Services Division ACTIVITY No.: L04FRO74
900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest
Renton, Washington 98055-1219
The following items must be addressed before final approval is granted and the plat is recorded.
This is a complete list of outstanding issues at this time; however, some new items may arise as a
result of these additions/corrections. If you have questions or need clarifications, please call
Steve Van Patten, PLS, Platting Review Engineer, at 296-7197.
1) Need a Plat Certificate dated within 30 days prior to the recording of this plat.
2) Need signatures of all owners and mortgage beneficiaries. Signatures must be originals on the
mylar map and notarized. Signatures and notary stamps must be in black ink.
3) Need a copy of the Final Health Approval. If on sewer in an urban area, current letters of
approval of the sewer and water systems by the utility district may be accepted in lieu of
Health Department approval. If there was an existing well or septic system, please provide
copies of the abandonment papers.
o 4) Need confirmation that the Homeowners Association (HOA) has been established
(incorporated). Please provide a copy of the Certificate of Incorporation showing name of the
HOA and the Washington State approval.
Q 5) Need approval from the King County Fire Protection Engineer.
6) When you are ready to establish your performance bond, please call me at 206 296-7197 and
I will route a request to inspection.
L_ 7) Pay all outstanding fees prior to recording. Once all major fees and activities have been
addressed, please provide notification to the plat reviewer. Within one week of notification,
King County Finance will then provide the final fee balance to be paid at plat approval.
8) Once the redlines have been addressed, please take a copy of the plat into the assessors office
Cor their preliminary review. Also, the applicant should contact Lilian Yetter at 206 296-4184
and pre -pay the taxes due for the new proposed lots.
9) Complete construction of the required improvements or post a performance bond.
10) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 1 of 10:
a) Correct the typo in the dedication.
b) Verify the vested owners and beneficiaries with an updated plat certificate. The current
copy that I have shows many more signers. Additional acknowledgements may be
needed.
c) Verify the names in the acknowledgements.
__2L_ d) Change the years.
a K e) You may want to add more space for the account numbers as there will be ten of them.
_Lk f) Revise the verbiage in the Land Surveyors Certificate as shown.
_k g) Insert Council into the Recording Certificate.
11) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 2 of 10.
a) Revise the parcel designations and correct the minor typos in the legal descriptions,
_b k, b) Pick either the HOA or the abutting lot owners in note 2.
_-Q-[s- c) Remove general note 3. Note that it is repeated on sheet 3.
i� d) Revise note 4 to the standard Note contained in the King County checklist and included
below.
—OL e) Revise the Downspout Note to match the verbiage contained in the Hearing Examiner's
condition no. 6.c.
f) Verify / revise Tract R to Tract T in note 1 under Plat Notes.
g) Comment -- regarding the notes for the tracts proposed to be owned by the Homeowners
Association: King County has recently revised its policy regarding ownership of certain
types of tracts. When possible, the tracts previously designated to be owned by the HOA,
shall now be owned by all the lot owners of the plat, and the maintenance to be the
responsibility of the Homeowners Association. Verbiage should be included in the note
that defaults the maintenance responsibility to the lot owners should the HOA fail to keep
up the maintenance. Also for landlocked tracts, verbiage shall be included to allow the
HOA reasonable access for maintenance.
h) Comment — the tracts containing the bio -retention swales must designated as / or having
the purpose of "Private Drainage" and must be maintained by the Homeowners
Association. See variance L04V0004 and L04V0003.
i) Please revise note 2 under Plat Notes. Please verify the following suggested note: "Tract
B is a Private Tract for Recreation, Open Space and Private Storm Drainage for the
benefit of all lot owners in this plat. Each ownership of a lot in this plat (lots 1 through
118, inclusive) includes an equal and undivided owner ershhi interest in said tract B. The
Shamrock Homeowners Association shall be responsible for the monitoring of potential
violations of the uses of this tract along with necessary maintenance. Should the
Homeowners Association fail to properly maintain Tract B, then the lot owners of all lots
1 through 118 shall be equally responsible for the maintenance of said tract."
j) For Plat Notes 3, 9 and 13,—Please revise so that the notes contain the phrases "Private
Joint Use Driveway Tract" and "Private Drainage". See suggested changes to note 3.
k) For Plat Notes 4, 5, 7, and 11, please revise to something like the following suggested
note — also see explanation above: "Tracts E, F, H and L are Sensitive Area Tracts for the
benefit of all lot owners in this plat. Each ownership of a lot in this plat (lots 1 through
118, inclusive) includes an equal and undivided o nnershin interest in said tracts E, F, H
and L. The Shamrock Homeowners Association shall be responsible for the monitoring
of potential violations of the uses of these tracts along with necessary maintenance.
2
Should the Homeowners Association fail to properly maintain Tracts E, F, H and L, then
the lot owners of all lots 1 through 118 shall be equally responsible for the maintenance
of said tracts."
o� 1) Please revise note b to the following suggested note: "Tract G is a Private Tract for
Open Space and Private Storm Drainage for the benefit of all lot owners in this plat.
Each ownership of a lot in this plat (lots 1 through 118, inclusive) includes an equal and
undivided -gzmar�Wp interest in said tract G. The Shamrock Homeowners Association
shall be responsible for the monitoring of potential violations of the uses of this tract
along with necessary maintenance. Should the Homeowners Association fail to properly
maintain Tract G, then the lot owners of all lots 1 through 118 shall be equally
responsible for the maintenance of said tract."
m) Please revise note 8 to the suggested note as follows: "Tract I is a Private Tract for Open
Space and for access to Tracts H and (namg private drainage =w`s`eesheet,---A a
4) for the purpose of maintenance, and is for the benefit of all lot owners in this plat.
Each ownership of a lot in this plat (lots 1 through 118, inclusive) includes an equal and
undivided own_ ersh. interest in said tract I. The Shamrock Homeowners Association
shall be responsible for the monitoring of potential violations of the uses of this tract
along with necessary maintenance. Should the Homeowners Association fail to properly
maintain Tract 1, then the lot owners of all lots 1 through 118 shall be equally responsible
for the maintenance of said tract."
n) Please revise note 10 to the suggested note as follows: "Tract K is for Open Space and
Private Storm Drainage for the benefit of all lot owners in this plat. Each ownership of a
lot in this plat (lots 1 through 118, inclusive) includes an equal and undivided owners ' .
interest in said tract K. The Shamrock Homeowners Association shall be responsible for
the monitoring of potential violations of the uses of this tract along with necessary
maintenance. Should the Homeowners Association fail to properly maintain Tract K,
then the lot owners of all lots 1 through 118 shall be equally responsible for the
maintenance of said tract."
o) Regarding Note 12: We recommend deleting Tract M and merging it into Lot 104 as a
panhandle. If you keep Tract M, then please include in your note the verbiage "heirs,
successors and assigns".
ok
p) Revise note 14 to the following. "Tract 0 is for Open Space and Private Storm Drainage
for the benefit of all lot owners in this plat. Each ownership of a lot in this plat (lots 1
through 118, inclusive) includes an equal and undivided ow ' interest in said tract
O. The Shamrock Homeowners Association shall be responsible for the monitoring of
potential violations of the uses of said tract along with necessary maintenance. Should
the Homeowners Association fail to properly maintain Tract O, then the lot owners of all
� lots 1 through 118 shall be equally responsible for the maintenance of said tract."
D q) Revise note 15 to the following: "Tract S is for Open Space and Private Storm Drainage
for the benefit of all lot owners in this plat. Each ownership of a lot in this plat (lots 1
through 118, inclusive) includes an equal and undivided ownership interest in said tract S.
The Shamrock Homeowners Association shall be responsible for the monitoring of
potential violations of the uses of this tract along with necessary maintenance. Should the
Homeowners Association fail to properly maintain Tract S, then the lot owners of all lots
1 through 118 shall be equally responsible for the maintenance of said tract."
f.Eo0e D r) Revise note 16 to the following: "Tract T is a storm drainage tract and is hereby
conveyed to King County, its heirs, successors and assigns for ownership and
maintenance purposes."
os) You will need to add the school impact fee note and the Road MPS note — see below. It
looks like the applicant may qualify for a few exemptions to the impact fees. If the
applicant elects to pursue the exemptions, please provide documentation for each
exemption demonstrating that the residence was demolished.
12) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 3 of 10:
a) Remove "King County" in note 1. The county doesn't need the easement, and if it is
included as a benefactor, the building setbacks to the streets will automatically be
increased an additional 5 feet.
D_ b) Add the missing verbiage to note 2.
_4L_ c) Make the corrections to note 3 as shown.
d) Revise note 4 using the same verbiage contained in Hearing Examiner note 15. j.
e) Verify that the Sewer and Water are in the same utility. If not, then note 7 regarding the
sewer and water easement and covenant may not be appropriate. The note should be
_6
verified with the City.
Add the bar scale.
Dl�
Add verbiage to note 13 to distinguish the easement from the back yard easement.
Fill in the recording information for the off-site plat of Honey Brooke Div. IV.
S g)
Please revise notes 14 and 15. A drainage easement should be recorded across the off -
Add the temporary cul de sac in lots 38 and 39.
R &D _-L
site proposed lot I 1 of the Renton plat and referenced in the plat note. Depending on the
Add Tracts A and C. See approved construction plans and the preliminary map.
_a k
verbiage in the proposed recorded off-site easement, the Renton lot 11 might not be able
Add the street names.
to join in the responsibility for maintenance. Also include in the revised plat note
verbiage to differentiate the back yard easement from the street frontage easement.
Please provide a copy of the proposed recorded easement prior to recording it.
cr- 6 -2 h)
Regarding notes 21 and 22 — I will review them upon receiving the revised plat
certificate. See the Plat Certificate issues below.
i)
Verify that there are two more easements that need to be addressed: Lots 8-11 and lots
27, 28.
13) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 4 of 10:
a)
Add the subdivisional line labels where applicable — see typical example.
NcPq
Enlarge Tract K — see the preliminary and the approved construction plans.
c, c)
Enlarge Tract T to include the wetland drainage pond, the overflow structure and the
%C
o � - d)
outfall structure.�e
Add a private drainage t connecting to tract I (for access) and southerly to Tract T.
a
Keep the proposed4m&O&n`ly as wide as necessary for maintenance and definitely keep it
outside of the wetland.
_6
e)
Add the bar scale.
6 k,
f)
Fill in the recording information for the off-site plat of Honey Brooke Div. IV.
aL
g)
Add the temporary cul de sac in lots 38 and 39.
pcCcfv
h)
Add Tracts A and C. See approved construction plans and the preliminary map.
_a k
i)
Add the street names.
14) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 5 of 10:
4
O([ a) Verify the right of way width for 14h Ave. SE fronting lots 73 through 77 and lots 80
through 82. Per the approved construction plans, section BB on sheet 23 of 32, the right
of way width is shown as 32'. If it should have been 30' as shown on the plat, please
a
confirm with Pat Simmons.srw��
b) Create and add a private drainagexsi for the drainage swell behind lots 65 through 71."�fE'��"
Add a note for the new trafto sl"ieet � of 10. Access for maintenance should be via Trac p`
I .
o c) Add "Continued on sheet _ of _" or "See Sheet _ of
Dcl�t"� d) Verify that Tract K should be extended easterly – see approved construction plans.
e) Add C24 to the curve table.
_ f) Verify / correct the right of way widths of 144th Ave. SE.
g) Correct L4, and add L51, L52 and L22.
T h) Add radial to L7 and define it in the Legend.
i) Add the bar scale.
6k , j) Add / revise the street names.
15) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 6 of 10:
a) Add the bar scale.
b) Add a radial bearing to Lot 96.
c) Add radial to the Legend and to L29.
d) Add "Continued on sheet _ of
e) Add Tract A. See the approved construction plans and preliminary map.
f) Add / revise the street names.
16) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 7 of 9:
.. a) Add "Continued on sheet _ of
n k b) Revise the westerly side of Tract T to include the wetland drainage tract.
ak c) Add the missing line work and dimensions to Lot 51.
ok . d) Add the radial bearing to the Legend and to L39.
aA e) Revise the labeling of the Sensitive area Tract F – i.e. remove "NGPE TRACT" and
insert "SAT".
Add the bar scale.
j_ g) Please provide a mapcheck for Lot 40.
h) Add the missing dimension in Lot 31.
ok i) Add / revise the street names.
17) Regarding the Redline comments on sheet 8 of 10-
a)
Add "Continued on sheet of _".
b)
Add radial to L39 and L40—and to the Legend.
c)
Add the bearing to the centerline of 146th Ct SE.
_p�-
d)
Add L31 to the table.
_L4
e)
Add 18 to lot 18.
f)
Correct lot 32.
__jL
_Q k_
g)
Add the bar scale.
� ,4rZ h)
Add Tract C – see preliminary map and approved construction plans.
i)
Add / revise the street names.
5
+ 1 S) Regarding the Redline comments on sheet 9 of 10:
o kk.
ofd
ok
a) Correct L56.
b) Add C95 and C96 to the curve table.
c) Revise the designation of Tract E and F — i.e. remove "NGPE TRACT" and insert "SAT".
d) Correct lot 32.
e) Correct Lot 40 and provide a mapcheck.
f) Add the Temporary Cul de sac easement including dimensions. Add and reference the
temporary sac easement note provided below.
g) Add note and recording no for the off-site drainage easement.
19) Regarding the Redline comments on sheet 10 of 10:
a) The area tables are not required. If you take them off, I won't have to spend time
checking them.
b) Add a radial bearing to Lot 96.
c) Please provide a new revised mapcheck for Tract B — revising the tangent bearing
southerly out of C51. It should be the same as for the right of way centerline and tangent
to C51.
d) Add radial to the Legend and to L32.
__j2k e) Add L50 to the table.
6k f) Add the bar scale.
20) Additional issues in the Hearing Examiner Conditions:
a) Per H.E. condition no. 9, please show I address the 100 year floodplain for the wetland
tracts,
ok b) Address H. E. condition no. 14 by providing a copy of the bond quantity worksheet listing
the survey corners or by setting the property corners prior to plat approval. Note that the
wetland signs are addressed in the engineering plans.
c) Please provide an explanation and documentation of which option the applicant has or
will pursue per H. E. condition no. 19. a. -- regarding the improvement of intersections
SR900/148th Ave. SE and SR 900/164th Ave. SE.
21) Regarding the plat certificate:
a) We have received a complaint from a Mr. Toan Nguyen, owner of Tax Lot no. 102305-
9042 which is a parcel of land lying immediately West of proposed lots 40, 41 and 42 of
this plat. His concern is that parcels of land, that he contends are under his ownership,
are being included in this plat of Shamrock 1. The parcels in contention are described as
the North 16 feet of the East 50 feet of the South half of the Northwest quarter of the
Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 10, and the North 16 feet of the
South half of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of
said section 10. At this point in time, he has provided enough evidence backing up his
claim of ownership to make this an issue of plat approval. Please discuss this with your
Title Company. I have received a copy of a brief summary of the chain of title for the 16
foot strips written by your Title Co.. After reviewing, I have additional questions. Please
provide more detailed documentation of the chain of title, including clarification of the
following points:
2
aa) Verify the legal description stated by the Title Co. for documents 3246220 and
3264024 the conveyance appears to overlap Goode's existing (at the time)
ownership. Also the two documents appear to be redundant;
bb) Include in the summary the changes in title after document 3516601, dated June 22,
1945;
cc) Verify with the Title Co. that it was the heirs of Edelman and not the heirs of Goode
that conveyed the 16 foot strip to Camwest Development. From the documentation
provided, it looks to me that it is the heirs of Goode that retain current ownership.
b) For your reference, a copy of Mr. Nguyen's email to King County is enclosed.
c) Please revise the plat certificate to exclude the off-site parcels - listed as Parcel A and
Parcel B in the certificate.
d) Need a copy of an approved revised preliminary map that includes the 16' x 50' parcel.
Note that the original preliminary does not include it. Also include said parcel into the
plat certificate. This is the parcel shown as your Parcel L in the legal description on the
,3� ` plat which I have redlined to be changed to Parcel J - see Redlines. In the alternative,
,�• remove the 16' x 50' parcel from the plat map so that it matches the approved
preliminary. Note that this request is subject to resolution with Mr. Toan Nguyen and
other possible issues regarding access and improvements within said parcel.
e) Note that the exceptions in the plat certificate will need to be verified by the Title
Company after the legal descriptions have been adjusted.
f) Once the certificate has been revised, show the locatable easements on the map pages and
list the remainingexceptions as Subject To's. Tiffe joc , S scit t"(p J
6n //- 7 - a S-.
22) There appears to be some fence encroachments. Please work with the adjoiner property
owners to resolve the fence encroachments and other physical appurtenances indicating
occupation in excess of 0.5 feet. All other encroachments including recovered monuments
should be shown on the plat with dimensional locations. The following encroachments I
noticed should be addressed:
a) Chain-link fence along the west line of proposed Tract H at the southwest corner;, BcEsS�GR
b) Chain-link fence along west line of proposed lots 40 through 42.
c) Fence of unknown type approximately 15 feet easterly of west line of proposed lots 401 F/f Urv(, rmcec
through 46.
a Ic! d) Wire fence along the south line of the 16 foot wide parcel proposed as right of way for SE
125th St v vre- k,C, PAd fisn 5, AI Jar`k',er J rJ C,,O,KAwCSt .
e) Wood fence at the entrance of SE 124t" St.
23) Please provide new ma checks for the exterior boundary and for all revised lots and tracts.
p l�
/o -4524) Because the off-site Renton Plat contains a storm drainage tract that is a part of Shamrock 1's
storm drainage system, it must record with functioning storm drainage facilities prior to
Shamrock 1. u rs C- 11- 7D -- a - 01c D o e s 44 f -s C -rn I- J va
25) Verify / add sidewalk easements for the sidewalks that extend outside of the right of way.
From the engineering plans it appears that lots 21, 11 and 117 and Tract B will need
easements. Include enough dimensions to the easements so they can be located. And add
some verbiage similar to the following: "The sidewalk easements denoted herein are hereby
7
dedicated to the public use for sidewalk purposes." Do not address maintenance obligations
in the note.
26) Address and return the redlines and checklist together with 2 copies of the revised maps.
ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTES:
(See note 4 page 2 of 10)
a k The road and storm drainage systems shall be constructed according to the approved pian and
profile, Plan No. P# 3097 on file with King County Department of Development and
Environmental Services (DDES). Any deviation from the approved plans will require written
approval from the proper agency, currently DDES.
The Temporary Turnaround Easement becomes null and void when (street name) is
extended to a publicly maintained road system and is accepted for maintenance by a public
agency. This casement may otherwise be extinguished by the recording of an extinguishing
document reviewed and approved, and signed by the King County Land Use Services Division or
its successor agency. A review fee may be assessed for this service.
(Roads, select either one of the following two notes):
All fees required by King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), have been
J paid.
(OR)
This plat is subject to King County Code 14.75, King County Road Mitigation Payment System
(MPS). The MPS fees plus the MPS administrative fee shall be paid at the time of building
permit application at the rate in effect at that time.
(Schools - unless revised by plat review engineer):
Fifty percent of school impact fees were paid at the time of final plat approval in accordance with
King County Code 21A.43.050. The balance of the assessed fee, $ per lot,
together with the current administration fee, must be paid at the time of building permit issuance.
(Addressing):
o The house address system for this plat shall be as follows: Addresses shall be assigned for the
north - south roads within the range of 12200 to 12599 and within the range of 14500 to 14799
for the east - west roads. Individual addresses will be assigned to the principal entrance of each
residence or building in accordance with King County Code 16.08.
(DEMOLISHED RESIDENCE IMPACT FEE NOTES: --USE ONL Y IF YO UARE CLAIMING
EXEMPTIONS TO THE IMPACT FEES SEEABOVE FOR EXPLANATION)
NOTE FOR SCHOOL FEES
o "SCHOOL FEES FOR LOTS THROUGH
Fifty percent of school impact fees were paid at the time of final plat approval in
accordance with King County Code 21A.43.050. The balance of the assessed fee,
$ per lot, together with the current administration fee, must be
paid at the time of building permit issuance."
"SCHOOL FEES FOR LOT
One residential unit was existing prior to the development of this subdivision. If the issuance
of a new building permit for Lot occurs on or prior to , (three
years after date of the issuance of the demolition permit), then said loahall be exempt from
the payment of the school impact fees. If the issuance of a new building permit for said lot
occurs after , then the full assessed fee, $ per lot,
together with the current administration fee, must be paid at the time of building permit
issuance. See K.C. code 21A.43.070.A.2."
NOTE FOR ROAD MPS FEES
(ff all fees are paid at recording, with the exception of the demolished residence A. e.: No
need to address demolished residence if no fees are required at building permit --- use
standard note below):
"All fees required by King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), have
been paid."
(If fees are deferred to building permit):
o "ROAD MPS FEES PER K.C. CODE 14.75 FOR LOTS THROUGH
This plat is subject to King County Code 14.75, King County Road Mitigation Payment
System (MPS). For Lots through , the MPS fees plus the MPS administrative
fee shall be paid at the time of building permit application at the rate in effect at that time.
ROAD MPS FEES PER K.C. CODE 14.75 FOR LOT
One residential unit was existing and occupied within the three years prior to the application
for development of this subdivision. Lot in this plat shall be exempt from the payment
of fees required by King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System. See King County
Department of Transportation Public Rule 6.2.1.4."
Steve Van Patten, P.L.S.
Engineering Review Section
to
From: toan nguyen [mailto:anandtoan@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 7:44 AM
To: ray.tlorent@metrokc.gov
Cc: steve.vantatten@metrokc.gov
Subject: Shamrock 1 project at 148th Ave SE, Renton, WA
Dear Mr. Florent:
First of all, I would like to thank you and Mr. Vantatten for meeting with me and my sister (Betsy
Lou) on 2/7/2005 so that I could voice my concern about the Camwest Inc.'s Shamrock 1 project
located at 148"' Ave. SE, Renton.
It came to my attention that the Camwest Inc. falsely filed Quit Claim Deed three times on my
property using my tax ID. It was clear to me that the Camwest Inc. has intentionally and
fraudulently claimed my land as their land to benefit their development project.
We have contacted Shelley Fooks, 425-646-8582, at the Transnation Title Insurance Co. to
inform her concerning their Order No. 300-10049351 that parcel K of Exhibit A is actually
belonged to me (An T. Phung, tax lot ID # 102305-9042-07), and that their error will cloud my
property title.
Since I am very concerned about what the Camwest Inc. has done; I will likely have to obtain
legal service from a real estate attorney. I would like you to review Camwest's submittals to
ensure correctness to protect the City of Renton and/or King County.
Per my understanding of our conversation, you will not approve the Camwest's proposal until the
Camwest Inc. has resolved this issue with me and with the City of Renton. 1 also understood that
you will keep me informed on the status of this project.
Thank you again for your assistance.
An {Andy) Phung
9333- 57 Ave. West
Mukilteo, WA 98275
425-342-0387 (W
I1
(i)
King County
D.D.E.S.
RED -2
Land Use Services Division
900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest
Renton, Washington 98055-1219
DATE
PLAT NAME:
FILE No.:
ACTIVITY No.:
April 25, 2005
SHAMROCK 1
L02P0014
L04FRO74
The following items must be addressed before final approval is granted and the plat is recorded.
This is a complete list of outstanding issues at this time; however, some new items may arise as a
result of these additions/corrections. If you have questions or need clarifications, please call
Steve Van Patten, PLS, Platting Review Engineer, at 296-7197.
1) Comment: Please reconsider my requests in RED -1 pertaining to the bio -retention swales
and the bio -retention pond. Said requests were based on discussions with Pat Simmons, Nick
Gillen and Kate Rhodes in mid February, and re-examined and confirmed with Mark Bergam
and Ray Florent for this review. The rain garden tracts were approved for private ownership
and maintenance per the Variances L04VO004 and L04VO003 — see RED -1, comment l l.h.
Because the bio -retention pond was not a requirement for wetland mitigation, King County
will be responsible for its ownership and maintenance. Tract T should be enlarged to include
the bio -retention pond and the appurtenant drainage structures such as the outfall. For
reference, please refer to the approximate tract boundaries shown on the drawing provided
herewith. Also see 16.b of RED -1.
2) Regarding all sheets:
a) Verify / revise the borders. They should have a margin of 2" on the top, rather then the 2-
1/2". See KCC 19A.16.060.
3) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 1 of 10:
a) Revise the date to 2005 in the Finance certificate.
4) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 2 of 10.
a) Verify that Parcel J remains part of this plat — see comments RED -1.
b) In the plat notes stating "undivided interest" — we recommend that it be stated as
"undivided ownership interest" so as to be clear that it is not some other type of interest.
,,jk c) Revise "community organization" to "Homeowners Association" in the applicable notes.
� _d) Include in note 8 the private drainage tract to be created — also see comments l l .m, 13.d
and 14.b of Red -1.
e) Recommend removing "hereby" in note 12 because the note already contains the phrase
"upon recording of this plat". Also remove the reference to "an interest in".
6 0 Revise "owner" to "owners" in note 13.
r
g) Remove the last sentence in note 16. ;5 e: o w r 0 v s L W, ge y C 0,-
- 4ZC
c^.ZC h) Verify the name of the Homeowners Association as used in the notes.
r 5) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 3 of 10:
_ n a) Insert the missing verbiage in note 3 under Easement Provisions.
b) Remove "sensitive area" from note 4.
c) Regarding notes 13 and 14: Your proposed notes should be ok as long as the owners of
the off-site lot 11 are willing to sign on this plat. In this case please add a signature line
and an acknowledgement and a statement something like the following: "The owners of
Lot 11 of the plat of filed in volume _ pages _, records of King County,
Washington, hereby grant and convey the private drainage easements referenced in notes
13 and 14 on sheet 3 of 10 herein, and hereby agree to the covenants for maintenance
contained in said notes". OR as an alternative, we recommend revising said notes 13 and
14 to reference an agreement by separate instrument which we can record simultaneously
with this plat — cross referencing the recording numbers.
_ d) Insert "the recording of" into note 22.
e) In note 2 under General Notes, please verify that lot corners were set with LS no 19620.
f) In note 3, revise "community organization" to "Homeowners Association",
a le, g) Insert "P" into note 4.
A� . h) Insert the missing verbiage in note 5.
i) Regarding note 7, insert the missing text and add identify and fill in the appropriate lot
numbers.
J) Regarding note 8, fill in the lot numbers and the vesting date. The vesting date is the date
of demolition per the demolition permit application, plus 3 years.
k) Revise note 10 to the version of the note applicable to the 1998 Drainage manual, See
note provided below. Be sure to include the title or heading of the note.
_ 1) Regarding note 23 for sidewalks: verify / add the sidewalk easements with dimensions
where applicable. See lots 21, 11 and 117 and Tract B.
�+L m) Regarding notes 24 and 25 — I will review them upon receiving the revised plat
certificate. See comments for RED -1.
6) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 4 of 10:
ok a) Add the additional subdivisional line labels.
b) Move the arrow for the subdivisional line label at the south boundary line of the project.
Q �4 c) Revise "NGPE" to "SAT".
o � d) Enlarge Tract T to include the wetland drainage pond, the overflow structure and the
outfall structure. See example enclosed.
o,k e) Add a private drainage easement connecting to Tract I (for access) and southerly to Tract
T. Keep the proposed easement only as wide as necessary for maintenance and definitely
keep it outside of the wetland.
�k 7) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 5 of 10:
a) Remove "NGPA" and "OPEN SPACE" from the Tracts H and L, and add "SAT".
Q b) Add (R) to the east line of lot 79.
art, c) Add the control point number to the Datum note.
p d) Add the missing dimensions to lots 67 and 93.
2
e) Create and add a private drainage easement for the drainage swell behind lots 65 through
99)
Regarding the Redline comments on Page 7 of 10:
71. Access for maintenance should be via Tract I.
8)
Regarding the Redline comments on Page 6 of 10:
Q�
a)
Verify the reference numbers in the sewer and water notes in lots 104 and 105.
o LK
b)
Add one radial bearing in the cul de sac.
V0
c)
Add the bearings to Tract N.
2
d)
Revise the overall dimension on the back of lots 101 and 102.
—ok
e)
Revise the reference to Parcel A to Parcel C in the off-site easement above lots 114
10) Regarding the Redline comments on sheet 8 of 10:
_...d�
through 117. Also add "sheet 2".
ck
f)
Verify / revise the delta for C59 in the curve tables.
SE 120 St.
g)
Add the missing reference notation for the ,oa r ae sement in lot 113 / 114.
_
h)
Verify / revise the dimensions for the road centerlines at the intersection of SE 123R" ST
Revise the half right of way width of 18.5' to 19' -- near lot 32.
—0 �',
and 148th Ave. SE. Recommend providing dimensions that are consistent to those
Revise C70 to C71 in Tract D.
/,CU -N
provided for the intersection of SE 120 St and 148th Ave SE. - see page 8.
fl
i)
Revise L29 so that it is tangent to the curves on each side or else clarify by adding the
Add the control point number to the Datum note.
radial bearings at each end. See Lot 1.
r�
j)
Add the control point number to the Datum note.
99)
Regarding the Redline comments on Page 7 of 10:
a)
Revise the westerly side of Tract T to include the wetland drainage tract.
A_
b)
Remove the partial text / lines.
O <
0
Clarify the total curve dimension - suggest adding "Total".
V0
d)
Add the missing dimensions to Lots 42 through 47.
Qk
e)
Please revise the centerline intersection at 145th Pl. SE and SE 125th ST. to as shown.
—ok
f)
Add the control point number to the Datum note.
10) Regarding the Redline comments on sheet 8 of 10:
_...d�
a)
Revise the centerline dimension of 25.37 to 26.34 at the intersection of 146th P1 SE and
SE 120 St.
01-
b)
Revise the centerline dimension of 122.00 to 122.01 -- near lot 32. See sheet 7 of 10.
--4�t
c)
Revise the half right of way width of 18.5' to 19' -- near lot 32.
—0 �',
d)
Revise C70 to C71 in Tract D.
/,CU -N
e)
Add a monument to the centerline intersection of SE 125t' ST and 148t" Ave. SE.
f)
Add the control point number to the Datum note.
11) Regarding the Redline comments on sheet 9 of 10:
_oL a) Please revise the centerline intersection at 145th Pl. SE and SE 125 I ST. to as shown.
t--_ b) Verify / revise the reference number in the temporary turnaround easement note.
--QL,', c) Add the control point number to the Datum note.
_--a d) Add the text demarking the boundary line between King County and the City of Renton.
12) Regarding the Redline comments on sheet 10 of 10:
I_ a) Add the control point number to the Datum note.
ok b) Clarify / label the easement in lot 88.
.-_._ c) Clarify the curve data in lot 100.
0A___. d) Revise the street names shown.
,IF
0
_ e) Revise the dimensions in lot 112.
f) Verify / revise the right of way widths of SE 124th ST.
1t - g) Verify / revise C30 in the tables. See tables on sheet 5.
13) Please provide new mapchecks for the exterior boundary and for all revised lots and tracts.
Also need a mapcheck for lot 40.
or- 14) Per H.E condition number 15.a — add a 15' building setback line from the buffer line of all of
the Sensitive Area Tracts with dimensions so that it can be surveyed. Affects Tracts H, L, F
and E. v
15) Address and return the redlines together with 2 copies of the revised maps.
ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTES:
(for General Note 10 sheet 3)
-6r,- Public Drainage Easement Restrictions:
Structures, fill, or obstructions (including but not limited to decks, patios, outbuildings, or
overhangs) shall not be permitted beyond the building setback line of the public drainage
easements. Additionally, grading and construction of fencing shall not be allowed within the
public drainage easements shown on this plat map unless otherwise approved by King County
DDES or its successor agency.
Steve Van Patten, P.L.S.
Engineering Review Section
4
soc
VanPatten, Steve
From:
Bergam, Mark
Sent:
Friday, October 14, 2005 1:47 PM
To:
'Sara Slatten'
Cc: Cheatum, Tim; VanPatten, Steve; nyinger@triadassoc.com; Foley, Steve; Rhoads, Kate
Subject: RE: Shamrock Tracts/Ownership/Maintenance Issues
Page i of 2
I stand completely corrected! It does not surprise me that the City of Renton would annex this plat into their city.
What does surprise me is that Renton expects homeowners to maintain their own ponds. That is a problem
waiting to happen, but it has nothing to do with DDES or CamWest. I completely agree that DDES should "final"
the plat in such a way as to facilitate the transfer to the City of Renton. As a way to document DDES finaling the
okplat in a way that is out of the ordinary (for DDES), could you send Steve VanPatten something in writing thatk indicates Renton's intention of annexing this plat?
The other issue about WLRD not understanding how to maintain a pond (stormwater wetland) that is defined in
the manual I am not going to touch. ;) The LID elements (rain gardens and amended bioswales) weren't going
to be maintained by WLRD anyway as defined in the adjustment.
Sara, it doesn't seem to me that we need to talk, Given the new information, I agree with you completely. I was
coming from the perspective that this was a typical situation. Sorry to throw a wrench into the situation.
Mark
-----Original Message -----
From: Sara Slatten [mailto:ssiatten@camwest.com]
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 10:08 AM
To: Bergam, Mark
Cc: Cheatum, Tim; VanPatten, Steve; nyinger@triadassoc.com; Foley, Steve; Rhoads, Kate
Subject: RE: Shamrock Tracts/Ownership/Maintenance Issues
Mark,
Thanks for your response back on the issue. The reasons we are proposing to have the combined KC
pond facility dedicated to the Shamrock HDA to own and maintain are two fold. First, it's likely the KC plat
will annex into the city of Renton at some point. The city typically requires new detention facilities within
their jurisdiction to be privately held and maintained by HOA's. The Shamrock HOA will already
assume ownership & maintenance responsibility for the detention pond facility that is contained within the
city's 11 -lot Shamrock plat to the south_ Rather than transfer the KC pond responsibilities to the HOA at
annexation, our hopes were to get a program set up front for the HOA to assume responsibility for both
ponds from the start. Secondly, in our earlier discussions with King County there was concern with the
County maintenance department not understanding the purpose of the LID program and mistakenly
removing vegetation from the ponds. Is there a time today that you would be available to discuss further?
Thanks,
Sara Slatten
-----Original Message -----
From: Bergam, Mark[maiito:Mark.Bergam@METROKC.GOV]
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 8:50 AM
To: Foley, Steve; Rhoads, Kate
Ce: Cheatum, Tim; VanPatten, Steve; Sara Slatten
Subject: Shamrock Tracts/Ownership/Maintenance Issues
10/25/2005
Page 2 of 2
Everyone,
I am attempting to clarify the tract ownership and maintenance responsibility issues surrounding the
Shamrock final platting activity. I was also the author of the adjustment that was granted to
Shamrock being one of the three Low Impact Development projects identified by the Demonstration
Ordinance. I understand that there is a maintenance concern for these features.
First, let me distinguish between the different tracts and their functions. 1) Pond Facility - This is a
combined detention and stormwater wetland (for water quality) facility containing two cells adjacent
to each other. There had been some confusion concerning whether the stormwater wetland portion
of the pond facility was also serving a wetland mitigation function. flick Gillen confirms it is not. 2)
Amended Soil Areas - Includes all yards associated with individual lots, bioswales which convey
runoff and rain gardens, -all of which precede the Pond Facility. 3) Wetland Mitigation Area -
Separate from the two areas previously described.
Second, in order to resolve the ownership and maintenance issues (so that final platting can
happen), let me suggest how the three areas will be handled based on the L04VO003 adjustment
decision and maintenance considerations routinely faced by WLRD maintenance.
1) Pond Facility - The entire combined detention and stormwater wetland will be in a tract owned
and maintained by King County. The Shamrock homeowners association can request a Special
Use Permit to supplement and enhance the aesthetic maintenance of the stormwater wetland
portion of the pond facility (or the entire facility for that matter). This is no different than a golf
course requesting the use of a County pond to also accommodate enhanced landscaping, irrigation
or fountain functions all owned and maintained by the golf course and allowed on County property.
2) Amended Soil Areas - Condition 6 of the L04VO003 Adjustment for Shamrock clearly states, "All
amended soil areas shall be located on private property and be privately maintained." Amended lot
areas, bioswales that convey runoff and rain garden areas, all of which precede the pond facility, are
privately owned and maintained like the adjustment says.
3) Wetland Mitigation Area - These are separate tracts owned and maintained by the homeowners.
I trust that this approach will accommodate the desires and concerns of all. Steve VanPatten needs
a response from someone confirming WLRD Maintenance's concurrence with this approach.
Mark
10/25/2005
01
RED -3
King County
D.D.E.S.
Land Use Services Division
900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest
Renton, Washington 98055-1219
Ion10
PLAT NAME:
FILE No.:
ACTIVITY No.:
October 26, 2005
SHAMROCK 1
L02P0014
L04FR074
The following items must be addressed before final approval is granted and the plat is recorded.
This is a complete list of outstanding issues at this time; however, some new items may arise as a
result of these additions/corrections. If you have questions or need clarifications, please call
Steve Van Patten, PLS, Platting Review Engineer, at 296-7197.
1) Regarding all sheets:
a) Verify / revise the borders. They should have a margin of 2" on the top, rather then the 2-
1/2". See KCC 19A.16.060.
2) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 1 of 10:
a) No comments.
3) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 2 of 10.
b a) Remove "open space" in note 16.
o 1, b) Add the verbiage in note 17.
4) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 3 of 10:
n y= a) Notes 13 and 14 need to be addressed.
k b) Note 24 needs to be revised — call me before returning redlines.
01, c) Revise impact fee notes — see enclosures.
5) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 4 of 10:
OTS, a) Typo in section designation below top.
6) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 5 of 10:
0 I a) Add Ll back on in cul de sac.
o r< b) Correct the dimensions in lots 67 and 88.
-.a� c) Fix the text / line conflict.
7) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 6 of 10:
a) Add the BSBL.
b` b) Add the curve data in Tract B.
b c) Move L31 into Lot 3.
8) Regarding the Redline comments on sheet 7 of 10:
1
a) Correct the dimensions
OUT OF TIME -- PLEASE CALL IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
9) Address and return the redlines together with 2 copies of the revised maps.
Steve Van Patten, P.L.S.
Engineering Review Section
2
SCHOOL FEES FOR LOTS 1 THROUGH 6 AND LOTS 11 THROUGH 118:
Fifty percent of school impact fees were paid at the time of final plat approval in
accordance with King County Code 21A.43.050. The balance of the assessed fee,
$2498.00 per lot, together with the current administration fee, must be
paid at the time of building permit issuance.
SCHOOL FEES FOR LOTS 7 THROUGH 10:
Four residential units were existing and demolished prior to the development of this
subdivision. If the issuance of a new building permit for Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10 occurs on
or prior to July 28, 2007 then said lots shall be exempt from the payment of the
school impact fees. if the issuance of a new building permit for said lot occurs
after July 28, 2007, then the full assessed fee, $4996.00 per lot, together with the
current administration fee, must be paid at the time of building permit issuance. See
K.C. code 21 A.43.070.A.2.
ROAD MPS FEES PER K.C. CODE 14.75 FOR LOTS 1 THROUGH 4,13
THROUGH 20,24 THROUGH 52 AND 58 THROUGH 118:
This plat is subject to King County Code 14.75, King County Road Mitigation
Payment System (MPS). For Lots 1 through 4, 13 through 20, 24 through 52 and 58
through 118, the MPS fees plus the MPS administrative fee shall be paid at the time
of building permit application at the rate in effect at that time.
ROAD MPS FEES PER K.C. CODE 14.75 FOR LOTS 5 THROUGH 12, 21
THROUGH 23 AND 53 THROUGH 57:
Four residential units were existing, occupied and demolished within the three years
prior to the application for development of this subdivision and an additional credit of
12 units were approved by the King County Department of Transportation for
exemption to the Road MPS fees. Therefore Lots 5 through 12, Lots 21 through 23
and Lots 53 through 57 in this plat shall be exempt from the payment of fees required
by King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System. See King County
Department of Transportation Public Rule 6.2.1.4.
0
RED -4
King County
D.D.E. S.
Land Use Services Division
900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest
Renton, Washington 98055-1219
DATE
PLAT NAME:
FILE No.:
ACTIVITY No.:
November 9, 2005
SHAMROCK 1
L02P0014
L04FR074
The following items must be addressed before final approval is granted and the plat is recorded.
This is a complete list of outstanding issues at this time; however, some new items may arise as a
result of these additions/corrections. If you have questions or need clarifications, please call
Steve Van Patten, PLS, Platting Review Engineer, at 296-7197.
1) Complete the pending issues / requests contained the previous Redline requests.
2) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 1 of 10:
L . a) Remove the Hunsakers and Hun LLC as beneficiaries in an updated plat certificate.
3) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 2 of 10.
a) Remove "ar ar" from Parcel I.
a 4- b) Add "ownership" into Tract Y.
4) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 3 of 10:
o k a) Separate Easement Provisions note 7 form note 6.
b) Add the recording number for Easement Provisions notes 13 and 14.
i� k c) Separate Easement Provisions note 23 from note 22.
n d) Insert "and or dispersion" into General Notes 5.
5) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 4 of 10:
a) No comments.
6) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 5 of 10:
a) Add a large asterisk to the lots shown.
—Dk b) Add the following note: "These lots are designated for individual lot dispersion systems
which shall be constructed at the time of the building permit and shall comply with the
plans on file. See "General Notes" number 5, sheet 3 of 10. Note that the location of said
dispersion systems may create additional building setback restrictions within the lots"
7) Regarding the Redline comments on Page 6 of 10:
a) Add a large asterisk to the lots shown.
b b) Add the asterisk note using the verbiage shown on page 5.
8) Regarding the Redline comments on sheet 7 of 10:
Steve Van Patten, P.L.S.
2
a)
Add the easement agreement notation for the two 16' wide parcels.
9)
Regarding
the Redline comments on sheet 8 of 10:
a)
No comments.
10) Regarding
the Redline comments on sheet 9 of 10:
a)
Resolve the text/line conflict.
a
b)
Remove the point descriptors.
a k
c)
Remove the portion of the 100 year flood plain that is off-site. See Tract E.
11) Regarding
the Redline comments on sheet 10 of 10:
a)
No comments.
12) Regarding
the plat certificate dated February 4, 2004 and updated Oct. 15, 2005 and the
accessory documents received November 4, 2005:
a)
Add as "Subject To" exception number 3, recording number 9606210966.
a k
b)
Add as "Subject To" exception number 4, recording number 305589.
nlc
c)
Add as "Subject To" exception number 5, recording number 2794410.
V_
d)
Add as "Subject To" exception number 6, recording number 2994768 and 2994769.
e)
Add as "Subject To" and show on sheets 7 and 9 exception number 7, recording number
5284273.
�C
f)
Please provide a copy of document under recording number 7808080827. this is in
regards to the title exception number 11. Note that the plat certificate refers incorrectly to
�d
recording number 7808080327.
g)
Please provide a copy of document under recording number 8706030864. Refer to title
exception number 12.
QJZ
h)
Regarding title exception number 18 for instrument number 20000508000205; Since the
title company doesn't recognize the Grantor (Phung) of said instrument as the true owner,
please re-record the document with the actual owner as the Grantor.
i)
Please provide a copy of 20000508000205 and 20000810000949. See exceptions 18 and
19.
j)
Please provide a copy of the unrecorded Lot Line Adjustment no S90M0351. See title
exception number 23.
k)
Relinquish or extinguish the covenant under recording number 9212291639. It creates a
reserve septic drainfield system over a portion of the plat and affects our approval of
Health for this plat. Note that the recorded instrument requires Health approval in order
to eliminate the covenant. Please provide a copy of the extinguishing document.
1)
Recommend removing title exception number 27 regarding the temporary access
easement as it appears to be off-site. If not, please add it as a "Subject To".
m)
Add as "Subject To" exception number 28, recording number 20041229002517 regarding
annexation agreement.
13) Address and return the redlines together with 2 copies of the revised maps.
Steve Van Patten, P.L.S.
2
Engineering Review Section
SOC Pagel of 5
r
. pr
VanPatten, Steve
.....
From: VanPatten, Steve
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 2:20 PM
To: 'Sara Slatten'
Subject: RE: Shamrock Property: Impact Fees Credits
OK, I have attached the plat note for impact fees and will include it in my redlines -- please review if you have a
chance. I will post the school fees Monday. The school fees will be for 118 minus 5 for existing and minus 5
models for a grand total 108 units. Also please note that I have added some additional verbiage to the standard
notes to reflect 1 clarify existing and demolished units and to clarify the additional Jeff Lee units.
--thanks
-----Original Message -----
From: Sara Slatten [mai Ito: sslatten@camwest.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 12,06 PM
To: VanPatten, Steve
Cc: nyinger@triadassoc.com; Lance Wiley
Subject: RE: Shamrock Property: Impact Fees Credits
Steve,
You are right. The correct traffic impact fee credit should be for 17 lots not 12 ( 5 existing homes and 12
lots based on nursery trip credits ). Your note about having 16 total traffic credits makes sense since lot
118 already has a house on it.
When we revise the plat to include your corrections, here's the lots we'll show on the notes for impact fee
credits:
School: Credit lots 7-10 (only 4 lots credited since lot 118 already has a home on it)
Traffic: Credit lots 5-12, 21-23 & 53-57
Attached are the receipts for the five model home permits we recently pulled. We paid the permit fees
including 100% of traffic and school impact fees for the following lots: 48, 51, 52, 94 and 95.
Thanks,
Sara
-----Original Message -----
From: VanPatten, Steve[mailto:Steve,VanPatten@METROKC.GOV]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 2.28 PM
To: Sara Slatten
Subject: RE: Shamrock Property: Impact Fees Credits
Sara,
Thanks for the detailed explanation. However your number 5) below appears to be in conflict
with the figures provided by Jeff Lee below_ If I am reading it correctly, Jeff seems to be
granting 17 exemptions including the 5 SF homes -- rather then 12 total per your comment?
Please verify.
10/27/2005
SOC
10/27/2005
Page 2 of 5
If you want, I will run the revised impact fee notes for the plat by you before sending them to
Triad - let me know. Note that the actual lot count for the SF homes in the plat note will only
be 4 -- not 5 because one is existing. If you want we can modify the standard notes so that
Lot 118 is mentioned, however the standard notes normally do not exempt out the lot with the
existing home. (Since no building permits will be applied for lot 118, no fees will be
collected.) Note that you will need to pick which lots will receive the exemptions. The
exemptions to the school fees will be for 4 lots which must be identified and the same lots
must also be exempted for the MPS fees.
You will need to make sure that you don't pick lots that you have applied for model homes
on. Again we can probably modify the standard notes to mention the model lots, but we
would normally not mention the them since no building permits will be applied for them after
plat recording.
Please identify which 16 (12+4) [or 11? (7+4) -- per your comment 5 below] lots to receive the
exemption from the MPS fees and which 4 lots to receive exemption from the school impact
fees.
Also please provide documentation of payment of impact fees for the models and which lots
the models are on.
—thanks
-----Original Message -----
From: Sara Slatten [mailto:sslatten@camwest.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 11:32 AM
To: VanPatten, Steve
Cc: Florent, Ray
Subject: RE: Shamrock Property: Impact Fees Credits
Steve,
Here are clarifications to your questions below. Also, the first attachment is a map of the plat
showing the pre-existing & existing structures to better explain what was and is out there.
1) The existing home contained within lot 118 will be retained by the owner, George
Palanchuk, is the only original structure that remains on site. I will look into the sewer &
water connection issue that you raised & get back to you.
2) The credits for the 5 homes accounts for Palanchuk's retained home on lot 118.
3) Attached are demo permits for structures on 5 parcels. Each permit was for
structures located on separate tax parcels and each had their own addresses. Only 4 homes
were demolished. There were four single family homes that were not counted as duplex or
mother in law units. The 5th permit was for a garage structure that was associated with the
Palanchuk property and contained on the portion we purchased (outside of his retained lot
118). ( see map)
4) 1 have been told that the demo permits have been signed off. if there's something
additional that you need for verification, please let me know and I will look into it.
5) The 12 trip credit Jeff Lee approved was an equation that combined 5 SF homes and 7
trips associated wl the nursery business.
Please continue to shoot me questions on anything and I'll do my best to promptly respond.
Thanks,
Sara
SOC Page 3 of 5
-----Original Message -----
From: VanPatten, Steve[ma ilto: Steve, Van Patten@ M ETROKC. GOV)
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 8:11 AM
To: Sara Slatten
Cc: Florent, Ray
Subject: RE: Shamrock Property: Impact Fees Credits
Sara,
I acknowledge the credits for the 12 trips approved by Jeff. However, I need to make
sure that the 5 credits for the existing residences is correct since they will also count
toward an exemption from the school fees. The exemption for the existing residences
must be the same (5 units?) for both types of impact fees. Since this site was a
nursery, it is not clear that all 5 units were separate single family residential units.
Mother in law residences do not count as a separate unit. Also it looks like one
residence is remaining on the plat? Please submit documentation supporting that 1)
each unit had a separate address, 2) was on a separate tax lot, and 3) was
demolished.
Also if there will be an existing residence remaining on the site (see lot 118) then I will
need documentation that the house has been dis-connected from septic and well
water -- and that all wells and septic systems have properly abandoned. Please refer
to issue 3 of RED -1 dated February 25, 2005.
—thanks
----Original Message -----
From: Sara Slatten [mai Ito: sslatten @camwest, com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 7:21 PM
To: VanPatten, Steve
Cc: Lee, Jeff; Claussen, Kimberly; Lance Wiley
Subject: FW: Shamrock Property: Impact Fees Credits
Steve,
Below is an email from last year from Jeff Lee, King County Roads, which
confirmed agreement with our traffic impact fee credit methodology broken
down as follows:
5 pre-existing homes on Shamrock (prior to demolition)
12 impact fee credits based on the commercial nursery use
totaling 17 credits towards 17 homes/lots for Traffic Impact Fees
5 pre-existing homes, totaling 5 school impact fee credits_
I hope this makes sense, If not, feel free to call me tomorrow morning.
Thanks,
Sara Slatten
-----Original Message -----
From: Lee, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Lee@METROKC.GOV]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 4:30 PM
To: Sara Slatten; 'haynie@tenw.com'; Claussen, Kimberly
Cc: Warren, Richard
Subject: FW: Shamrock Property: Traffic Impact Fees
Sara,
10/27/2005
soc
10/27/2005
Page 4 of 5
We have looked into your request for a trip credit towards your MPS fee and agree that
the development should receive a credit for the demolition of the previous existing
uses. To remain consistent with prior applications, we re -calculated the credit for a
Single -Family unit (ITE 210) based on its rate, rather than equation. This brings the
total trip credit to 17 trips.
Land Use Units Per Trips
Single Family 5 D.U. 5
Nursery 25 Employees 12
Total 17
Since the ITE rate basically translates 1 SF unit to 1 P.M. peak hour trip, the Shamrock
Property will receive a t7 Single -Family unit credit towards their MPS fee. If you have
questions, please contact me at (206) 263-4759.
Jeff
-----Original Message -----
From: Sara Slatten [mailto:sslatten@camwest.com]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 11:04 AM
To: richard.warren@metrokc.gov
Cc: haynie@tenw.com
Subject: RE: Shamrock Property: Traffic Impact Fees
Richard,
Attached is the memo again which now includes the referenced attachment A.
Thanks,
Sara
<<Shamrock Property Memo 3-18-04.pdf>>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sara Slatten
> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 10:44 AM
> To: 'richard.warren@metrokc.gov'
> Cc: 'Jeff Haynie'
> Subject: Shamrock Property: Traffic Impact Fees
> Richard,
> Cam West is currently in preliminary plat review on the Shamrock Property, located
NW of 148th Ave SE & NE 4th Street on the East Renton plateau. This plat is for 118
single-family lots and Kim Claussen is planning to issue our SEPA determination late
next week. I met with Kim earlier this week and discussed our proposal to receive
traffic impact fee credit as the site was previously used for a commercial nursery
business and it contained five single-family homes. Attached is a memo from our
traffic consultant Jeff Haynie, TENW, outlining our proposal. This proposal is similar
to one you approved for our Sweetbriar Nursery project back in 2000. Kim asked that I
forward this to you for review. I will mail a hard copy out to you in today's mail. If
you have any questions about this could you please follow up with either Jeff or myself
in the upcoming weeks.
> Thanks,
50C
> Sara Slatten
> Cam West Development
> (425) 825-1955; phone
> (425) 825-1565; fax
> www.camwest.com
> << File: Shamrock Property Memo 3-18-04.pdf>>
10/27/2005
Page 5 of 5
SOC
,J
VanPatten, Steve
1
From: Sara Slatten [sslatten@camwest.comj
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 12:27 PM
To: VanPatten, Steve
Cc: Bergam, Mark
Subject: RE: Shamrock Tracts/Ownership/Maintenance Issues
Page l of 3
Tn
r
V1 c 'ice i:-. (C . %flfcrS IS 40
113-�-! �'tL: l'� r li[ y �- �-4 J Y� r u,rc� •t
y G �f J G� Pd'{ Uaj e- fi CxC
Steve & Mark,
Attached is an agreement to annex that we entered into with the city of Renton for the Shamrock plat. The city
required us to sign this agreement as requirement of obtaining sewer availability. I have had discussions with the
city about timing w/ the actual annexation but have yet to determine a timeline. Shamrock is contained w/in an
area were many annexation applications have recently occurred and been approved- In anticipation of this, the
city required us to sign the attached form for Shamrock. Please let me know if you have any further questions or
if you prefer to talk to the city a city contact and I can provide the info.
Thanks,
Sara
-----Original Message -----
From: VanPatten, Steve[mailto:Steve.VanPatten@METRO KC.GOV]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 8:15 AM
To: Sara Slatten
Subject: RE: Shamrock Tracts/Ownership/Maintenance Issues
Sara,
Per Mark's comment below please provide documentation of Renton's intention of annexing this plat.
---thanks
-----Original Message -----
From: Bergam, Mark
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 1:47 PM
To: 'Sara Slatten`
Cc: Cheatum, Tim; VanPatten, Steve; nyinger@triadassoc.com; Foley, Steve; Rhoads, Kate
Subject: RE: Shamrock Tracts/Ownership/Maintenance Issues
I stand completely corrected! It does not surprise me that the City of Renton would annex this plat
into their city. What does surprise me is that Renton expects homeowners to maintain their own
ponds. That is a problem waiting to happen, but it has nothing to do with DDES or CamWest. I
completely agree that DDES should "final" the plat in such a way as to facilitate the transfer to the
City of Renton. As a way to document DDES finaling the plat in a way that is out of the ordinary (for
DDES), could you send Steve VanPatten something in writing that indicates Renton's intention of
annexing this plat?
The other issue about WLRD not understanding how to maintain a pond (stormwater wetland) that is
defined in the manual I am not going to touch- ;) The LID elements (rain gardens and amended
bioswales) weren't going to be maintained by WLRD anyway as defined in the adjustment.
Sara, it doesn't seem to me that we need to talk. Given the new information, I agree with you
completely. I was coming from the perspective that this was a typical situation. Sorry to throw a
wrench into the situation.
Mark
10/26/2005
`J e r� l �t � _LSC z ✓'
__-
7 sI ZD
SoC
10/26/2005
Page 2 of 3
-----Original Message -----
From: Sara Slatten [ma !Ito:sslatten@camwest.com]
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 10:08 AM
To: Bergam, Mark
Cc: Cheatum, Tim; VanPatten, Steve; nyinger@triadassoc.com; Foley, Steve; Rhoads, Kate
Subject: RE: Shamrock Tracts/Ownership/Maintenance Issues
Mark,
Thanks for your response back on the issue. The reasons we are proposing to have the
combined KC pond facility dedicated to the Shamrock HOA to own and maintain are two
fold. First, it's likely the KC plat will annex into the city of Renton at some point. The city
typically requires new detention facilities within their jurisdiction to be privately held and
maintained by HOA's, The Shamrock HOA will already assume ownership & maintenance
responsibility for the detention pond facility that is contained within the city's 1I -
lot Shamrock plat to the south. Rather than transfer the KC pond responsibilities to the HOA
at annexation, our hopes were to get a program set up front for the HOA to assume
responsibility for both ponds from the start. Secondly, in our earlier discussions with King
County there was concern with the County maintenance department not understanding the
purpose of the LID program and mistakenly removing vegetation from the ponds. Is there a
time today that you would be available to discuss further?
Thanks,
Sara Slatten
-----Original Message -----
From: Bergam, Mark[mailto:Mark.Bergam@METROKC.GOV]
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 8:50 AM
To: Foley, Steve; Rhoads, Kate
Cc: Cheatum, Tim; VanPatten, Steve; Sara Slatten
Subject: Shamrock Tracts/Ownership/Maintenance Issues
Everyone,
I am attempting to clarify the tract ownership and maintenance responsibility issues
surrounding the Shamrock final platting activity. I was also the author of the
adjustment that was granted to Shamrock being one of the three Low Impact
Development projects identified by the Demonstration Ordinance. I understand that
there is a maintenance concern for these features.
First, let me distinguish between the different tracts and their functions. 1) Pond
Facility - This is a combined detention and stormwater wetland (for water quality)
facility containing two cells adjacent to each other. There had been some confusion
concerning whether the stormwater wetland portion of the pond facility was also
serving a wetland mitigation function. Nick Gillen confirms it is not. 2) Amended Soil
Areas - Includes all yards associated with individual lots, bioswales which convey
runoff and rain gardens, -all of which precede the Pond Facility. 3) Wetland Mitigation
Area - Separate from the two areas previously described.
Second, in order to resolve the ownership and maintenance issues (so that final
platting can happen), let me suggest how the three areas will be handled based on the
L04VO003 adjustment decision and maintenance considerations routinely faced by
WLRD maintenance.
1) Pond Facility - The entire combined detention and stormwater wetland will be in a
tract owned and maintained by King County. The Shamrock homeowners association
can request a Special Use Permit to supplement and enhance the aesthetic
maintenance of the stormwater wetland portion of the pond facility (or the entire facility
for that matter). This is no different than a golf course requesting the use of a County
SOC
10/26/2005
Page 3 of')
pond to also accommodate enhanced landscaping, irrigation or fountain functions all
owned and maintained by the golf course and allowed on County property.
2) Amended Soil Areas - Condition 6 of the L04V0003 Adjustment for Shamrock
clearly states, "All amended soil areas shall be located on private property and be
privately maintained." Amended lot areas, bioswales that convey runoff and rain
garden areas, all of which precede the pond facility, are privately owned and
maintained like the adjustment says.
3) Wetland Mitigation Area - These are separate tracts owned and maintained by the
homeowners.
I trust that this approach will accommodate the desires and concerns of all. Steve
VanPatten needs a response from someone confirming WLR❑ Maintenance's
concurrence with this approach.
Mark
Return Address:
City Clerk's Office
City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA. 98055
DECLARATION OF COVENANT AND
Property Tax Parcel Numbers: 1023059319, 9022,
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT
9415 9174 9031 9191 9384 9030 9042
NEW DEVEI.OPXZNT
Street Intersection or Project Name: Shauimek Heights
Grantor(s): Grantee(s):
1. Shamrock Highlands, LLC 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation
The Agreement executed herein between the City of Renton, Washington, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as
"C TTY' and the Grantor(s), as named above and/or successors in interest of certain property, hereinafter referred to as
"OWNER", is for and in consideration of the f uldshing of utility service by the CITY to certain property of the OWNER
hereinafter referred to as "PROPER`T'Y". The OWNER does hereby petition for annexation of the PROPERTY to the CITY,
does hereby agree to the conditions of annexation herein, and does hereby declare this covenant.
1. ( )WLEDGEMEN 'S AND REPRESENTATIONS
The Grantor does hereby acknowledge and agree as follows:
1.1. The OWNER is the owner of certain PROPERTY, which is located outside the corporate limits of the
CTTY_
1.2. The OWNER is seeking Preliminary Plat approval from King County for the PROPERTY.
1.3. The OWNER has requested the CITY to furnish sewer service to the PROPERTY.
1.4. . This Agreement to extend sewer service outside the corporate limits of the CITY is authorized by RCW
35.67.3 10 and RCW 35.92.174 and shall not be construed as a voluntary agreement pursuant to RCW 82.02.420
and therefore the provisions of RC'W 82.42.024 shall not be applied hereto.
1.5. 'Phis Agreement does not preclude any evaluation and determination by the CITY that later development
actions or proposals undertaken by the OWNER may require a determination of significance and environmental
review under SEPA
1.6_ Per Renton Municipal. Code Section 46-040, the owner of property in Renton's Potential Annexation
Area shall execute a commitment to future annexation and compliance with certain other conditions as a
prerequisite for the extension of or connection to the City's sanitary sewer system outside of the City Limits.
1.7. A CITY'S requirement of an annexation agreement or a commitment to future annexation as a condition
of extending utility service outside the corporate limits of the CITY' is recognized by Washington law.
1.8_ The PROPERTY is located within the CITY'S POTENTIAL. ANNEXATION AREA or URBAN
SERVICE AREA for annexation purposes as adopted by the CITY in its Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the King
County Countywide Planning Policies.
CLARMON OF CVENANT AND
Tax Parcel Numbers:
319,
DF
ANNEXATIONOAGREEMU,N'1 1 Pra 9415, 9174, 9031 9191, 9384 03099[1429022, I
C NEW DEVELOPMENT I Street lntersectioa or Project Name: Shamrock Heights
1.9. It is the interest of rhe citizens ofthe CTIY to insure that al1 public imprvmments that are or could be
constructed within the corporate limits of the C= or will be ultimotety annexed into the CITY are constructed in
accordance with C.lrY construction standards.
1.10. The OWNER'S request for the extension of utility services was duly considered by the CITY, and it was
determined that the furnishing of sewer service to the PROPERTY would be proper upon the fulfilling of all
conditions herein.
1.11. The OWNER does hereby acknowledge that in the event of violation or breech of the terms of this
PETTTON, AGREEMENT AND COVENANT, or upon the invalidation of this PETITON, AGREEMENT AND
COVENANT by judicial action, operation of law or otherwise, the CITY reserves the right at its sole discretion to -
immediately terminate the provision of utility service to the PROPER'T'Y and in such case the OWNER agrees to
indemnify and hold the CITY harmless from any and all claims of any party.
2. PROPERTY DESCRIPEON
The PROPERTY is hereby described as follows:
The PROPERTY is legally described in Attachment A,, attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth
in full. The OWNER warrants that Attachment A is correct•as "describing subject PROPERTY.
3. PE7TT'TON AM C0YMiAhUF-09AEj+1EXATION
The OWNER, in consideration of the CITY'S agreement to provide utility service to the PROPERTY, does hereby
petition, agree and covenant as follows:
3.1 The OWi+IER does hereby agree, promise and covenant that if at any time the PROPERTY is included
within any area which is being considered for annexation to the =, said OWNER does join in said annexation.
3.2 The OWNER agrees to execute all necessary documents such as letters, notices, petitions or other
instrunxeuts ioitlatiog, furthering or accomplishing the annexation of the PROPERTY to the CTFY, whether or not
the annexation involves the assumption by the area to be annexed of existing CITY indebtedness, the application to
the area to be annbxed of the CI'T'Y Comprehensive Plan and land use controls, and such other conditions as the
CITY may lawfully impose. The OWNER, for him/herlthemselves and for his/her/their heirs, successors and
assigns, agrees and covenants with the CITY, and to the present and future owners of the PROPER'T'Y to which
this covenant relates, that such agreement is to constitute a covenant running with the land, that heJsheithey shall,
whenever so requested, execute such letters, notices, petitions or other instruments. OWNER understands that the
CITY will record this document and the OWNER agrees to speciEcally advise future interests in the property.
Covenant to Anncx Document 1 1-3 0-0411 1/29 /04 Paget FORM 03 0008/bb/
DECLARATION OF COVENANT AND Property Tax Parcel Numbers: 102305931.9, 9022,
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT 1 9415, 9174, 9031, 91.91., 9384, 9030, 9042
NEW DEVELOPMENT I Street Intersection or Project Name: Shamrock Heights
4.
3.3 The OWNER recognizes that the laws of the State of Washington relating to the annexation of property
by a city provides that property may be annexed to a city if property owners sign a petition for such an annexation.
The OWNER reoogrvzed and agrees that by signing this Agreement; the PROPERTY of the OWNER will
automatically be included as a property to be annexed in the event PROPERTY is within a proposed annexation
area. The OWNER further recognizes that there are other methods of annexation allowed under the laws of the
State of Washington, including the election method
3.4 The OWNER understands that the OWNER'S signatures on this Agreement is an admission that the
OWNER understands the certain rights which the OWNER has regarding the PROPERTY and that the OWNER is
willingly waiving such rights in consideration of receiving the described utility services.
3.5 The undersigned OWNER of the PROPER1Y, on behalf of himselgherseIflthemselves, bis/her/their
heirs, successors and assigns, hereby designate(s) the CITY as OWNER'S true and lawful attorney-in-fact for the
purpose of signing any petition leading to the annexation of said PROPERTY to the CITY, with full power to do
and perform any proper act which the O WNTR may do with respect to the annexation of said real property. The
CITY may exercise this power through its City Clerk or otherwise as the CITY COUNCIL. may direct. This
Special Power of Attorney is given for the valuable consideration of the furnishing of sewer service by the CITY,
and this Special Power of Attorney is fu Cher given as security for performance of the annexation covenant
obligation set forth herein. This Special Power of Attorney is not revocable and shall not be affected by the
disability of the principal.
AGREEMENT' OVENENT OF LQkMMQM ANP MITIGATION MEASUZES
The OWNER acknowledges that the CITY has a desire to have certain minimum development standards met for
new developments in the CITY's Potential Annexation Area. The OWNER, in consideration of the CITY's
agreement to provide sanitary sewer utility service to the PROPERTY and in recogaition of the CITY's conditions
for annexation of the PROPERTY, does hereby agree and covenant to submit their development plans to the CITY
for review and approval prior to official submittal to King County. Except as may be waived by the CITY's Public
Works Administrator or hislher designee, the minimum design standards that will be required are:
4.1 The OWNER shalf provide record drawings of all ofthe constructed Public Work's facilities for the
CITY's records.
Covenant to Amm Document 1 1-3 0-0411 1f19/04 Page 3 FORM 03 000&bW
DECLARATION OF COVENANT AND Property Tax Parcel Numbers 1023059319, 9022,
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT 9415, 91.74, 903X, 9191, 9394, 9030, 9042
NEW DEVELOPMENT Street Intersection or Project Name: Shamrock Heights
5. GENERAL PROVISIONS
The OWNER and the CnY do hereby acknowledge and agree to the following provisions, which apply to the
entire Agreement herein
5.1 The OWNER agrees that all future land use and development on the PROPERTY will meet all land use
and development standards of the CITY. In the event of a conflict between CITY standards and any applicable
County standards, the more restrictive standards as determined by the CITY shall apply.
52 No modifications of this Agreement shall be made unless mutually agreed upon by the parties in writing.
5.3 Nothing in this agreement shall be construed to create any financial obligation on the part of the CITY
with regard to annexation, conskruttion of utilities and appurtenances, or any other matter. 'rho OWNER and the
CITY hereby acknowledged that it is the OWNER's responsibility to finance the design and construction of utility
facilities needed to serve OWNER's property consistent with the CITY plans and specifications, unless otherwise
agreed by the CiTY.
5.4 The terms and provisions of this PETITION, AGREEMENT AND COVENANT shall insure to the
benefit and become binding upon the heirs, assigns and/or successors in interest of the parties hemto. The
OWNER agrees to indemnify and hold the CITY harmless from any claims any subsequent purchaser may have as
a result of this Agreement, including CITY'S attorney fees and costs.
5.5 Any notice or demand required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be sufficient if given
in writing and sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the address of the parties set forth
below. Any notice shall be deemed to have been given on the date it is deposited in the U.S. Postal Service mail
with postage prepaid.
5.6 If for any reason of any default or breach on the part of either the OWNER or the CITY in the
performance of any of the provision of this Agreement a legal action is instituted, the party not prevailing agrees to
pay all reasonable costs and attorney fees and costs in connection therewith. It is hereby agreed that the venue of
any legal action brought under the terms of flus Agreement shall be Ding County, Washington. This Agreement
shall be governed by the applicable laws, rules, and regulations of the State of Washington and the CITY.
5.7 In the event that any term, provision, condition, clause or other portion of this Agreement be held to be
iuoperativc, invalid, void, or in conflict with applicable provision, condition, clause or other portion of this
Agreement, and the remainder of this Agreement shall be effective as if such term, provision, condition or other
portion bad not been contained hereia, and to this end, the terms of this Agreement are declared by the parties to be
severable,
5.8 Upon execution, the CITY will record these covenants with the King County Recorder's Of5ee.
Covenant to Annex Document 11-30-44111129104 Page 4 FORM 03 0008/bbl
DECLARATION OF COVENANT AND Property Tax Parcel Numbers 1023059319, 9022,
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT 1 9415, 9174, 9031, 9191, 9384, 9030, 9042
NEW DEVELOPMENT € Street Intersection or Project Name: Shamrock Heights
IN WI'T'NESS WHEMOF, I have hereunto set my hand and sea] the day and year as written below.
Gran r Signa s) INDIUD UADPOiMOFACKNOWlkF.DG17MENT zzc.
Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS
COUNTY OF KING }
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that
signed this instrument and
acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes
mentioned in the instrument
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Notary (Print)
My appointment expires-
Dated:
DECLARATION OF COVENANT AND
Property Tax Parcel Numbers: 1023059319, 9022,
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT
9415, 9174, 9031, 9191, 9384, 9030, 9042
Project File W:
Street Intersection or Project Name: Shamrock Heights
IN WITNESS WEEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below.
CORPORATE FORM OFAC3NO W7�&aGACW
Notary Seal must be within box
STATE OF WA.SInNGTON ) SS
COUNTY OF KING )
On this _5L11- day of�♦ 20 before me personally appeared
`1,l�lti 1111 !lllt
S.
/
YAG Glbt!1 e$E`L. to me known to
be mfr" bZ1- the that
f��i
C1 ��
of corporation
executed the within h= myent, and acknowledge the said instrumem to be the free
,,, g«
4
and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purp oses therein
*:
27R w
mentioned, and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said
200$ r�
instrumcnt and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation.
s
i�O*'OPWASKW6 "0 �``�
`�
!
Notary Pub ac in and far the State of Washington
kP,��,
Notary (Print)• S•
My appointment expires: 4 -Z-1
Dated: - 3b` bA
Covenant to Annex Document 11-30-44111/29/44 Page 5 FORM 03 00081b1d
Sh=rock Height Property
Attachment A
PARCEL C:
THE NORTH 112 OF THE NORTH V2 OF THE SOUTH 1h OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE EAST 1h
OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M.;
EXCEPT THE EAST 280 FEET THEREOF;
TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER THE SOUTH 30 FEET
OF SAID EAST 280 FEET;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF FOR 148T" AVENUE SOUTHEAST RIGHT OF WAY;
SITUATE IN THE COUNT( OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
PARCEL D:
THE SOUTH 1h OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1h OF THE NORTH 1h OF THE EAST- 1/2 }
OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH; RANGE 5 EAST W.M.;
EXCEPT COUNTY ROAD; y
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY .OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
PARCEL E.-
THE
:THE WEST 794 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1h OF THE SOUTH 1h OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M.;
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON;
ALSO KNOWN AS A PORTION OF LOT E OF UNRECORDED LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO.
S90M0351.
PARCEL F:
THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH Ila OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF
SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NQRTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M.;
AND EXCEPT THE WEST 794 FEET THEREOF;
AND EXCEPT THE EAST 230 FEET OF THE NORTH 300 FEET THEREOF;
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
Shamrock Height Property
AttachmentA
PARCEL G:
THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST
1/4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M.;
EXCEPT THE• NORTH 168.45 FEET OF THE EAST 302.15 FEET THEREOF;
ANI) EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF FOR 148TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST RIGHT OF WAY;
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
PARCEL H:
THE NORTH 168.05 FEET OF THE EAST 302.15 FEET OF THE NORTH th OF THE
NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 10,
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M.;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF FOR 148TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST RIGHT OF WAY;
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON
PARCEL I:
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE. SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE
SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W. M.,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH 1h ;
THENCE NORTH 88620'44" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH Yz, 50 FEET
TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 880 20' 44" WEST, 216.94 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°15'25"WEST PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTH th,
329.36 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF;
THENCE SOUTH 88020'52" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH 1h, 266.94
FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF;
THENCE NORTH 00015'25° EAST ALONG THE EAST TINE OF SAID SOUTH 1/2, 313.35 FEET
TO A POINT 16 FEET SOUTHERLY OF SAID NORTHEAST CORNER;
THENCE NORTH 88020144" WEST PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH 1/2,
50 FEET; -
THENCE NORTH 00°15'25" EAST PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTH 1h, 16
FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE: OF WASHINGTON.
Shamrock Height Property
AttachmentA
PARCEL J:
THE SOUTH 1h OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/a OF
SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W. M.;
EXCEPT THE FORTH 132 FEET THEREOF;
AND EXCEPT THE EAST 286 FEET THEREOF;
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
PARCEL K.
j
THE NORTH 16 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST'/a' OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/a
OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W. M.;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF FOR 1487H AVENUE SOUTHEAST RIGHT OF WAY;
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
PARCEL L; W
THE NORTH 16 FEET OF THE EAST 50 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1h OF THE NORTHWEST 1/a OF
THE SOUTHEAST V/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,
RANGE 5 EAST, W. M.;
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF !GING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
400 Yesler Way, Room 404
Seattle, Washington 98104
Telephone (206) 296-4660
Facsimile (206) 296-1654
REPORT AND DECISION
May 12, 2004
SUBJECT: Department of Development and Environmental Services File No. L02P0014
Proposed Ordinance No. 2004-0160
SHAMROCK PROPERTY
Preliminary Plat Application
Location: Between Northeast 4th Court and Southeast 120th Street on the west side
of 148th Avenue Southeast
Applicant: Cam -West Development, Inc., & Shamrock Highlands, LLC
represented by Sara Slatten
9720 Northeast 120th Place, Ste. 100
Kirkland, WA 98034
Telephone: (425) 825-1955
King County: Department of Development and Environmental Services
represented by Kim Claussen
900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest
Renton, Washington 98055-1219
Telephone: (206) 296-7167
Facsimile: (206) 296-6728
SUMMARY OF DECISION/RECOMMENDATION:
Department's Preliminary Recommendation:
Department's Final Recommendation:
Examiner's Decision:
EXAMINER PROCEEDINGS:
Hearing Opened:
Hearing Closed:
Approve subject to conditions
Approve subject to revised conditions
Approve subject to revised conditions
May 6, 2004
May 6, 2004
L02POO14 — Shamrock Property Subdivision
Page 2 of 14
Participants at the public hearing and the exhibits offered and entered are listed in the attached minutes.
A verbatim recording of the hearing is available in the office of the King County Hearing Examiner.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner
now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
1. General Information:
Developer: Cam -West Development, Inc.
9720 NE 120'h Place, Suite 100
Kirkland, WA 98034
425-825-1955
Engineer: Triad Associates
11814 115'' Ave NE
Kirkland, WA 98034
425-821-8448
STR: 10-23-05
Location: The site is located between NE 4'' Court and SE 120'' St., on the west
side of 148`' Avenue SE
Zoning:
R4
Acreage:
29.8 acres
Number of Lots:
118 lots
Density:
Approximately 4 units per acre
Lot Size:
Lots average approximately 5,000 square feet in size
Proposed Use:
Single-family detached dwellings
Sewage Disposal:
City of Renton
Water Supply:
King County Water District #90
Fire District:
City of Renton
School District:
Issaquah School District
Complete Application Date: October 29, 2002, revised October 8, 2003
Except as modified herein, the facts set forth in the King County Land Use Services Division's
preliminary report to the King County Hearing Examiner for the May b, 2004, public hearing are
found to be correct and are incorporated herein by reference. The LUSD staff recommends
approval of the application, subject to conditions.
3. Cam -West has filed a preliminary plat application to divide 29.8 acres into 118 lots for a single-
family residential development. The property lies northeast of the City of Renton in a rapidly
urbanizing area and consists of two minimally contiguous development pods. The larger northern
L02POO14 — Shamrock Property Subdivision
Page 3 of 14
parcel was previously the site of a nursery and contains a low -impact development proposal
comprising the 76 lots that lie north of Southeast 124th Street. The south6m parcel contains 7
lots within King County plus another I I lots within the City of Renton. The Renton parcel also
contains a detention and water quality treatment tract that will serve the King County lots located
south of Southeast 124th Street. The Renton portion of the subdivision is being reviewed by the
City contemporaneously with King County review of the instant application.
4. The Shamrock plat is within one of three demonstration project areas identified in KCC
21A.55.060 as suitable for experimentation in low impact development. As such the LID
proposal has received unusually extensive review by King County staff. The primary emphasis
of the experimental best management practices proposed for the LID portion of Shamrock is
focused on reducing the plat's drainage impacts so that a smaller RID facility can be employed.
Some of the innovations proposed include the use of cross -sloped roads with runoff sheet -flowing
to swales, partial infiltration of roof and drain runoff, and the use of amended soils to increase
infiltration capacity.
The proposed northern drainage pond complex lies adjacent to a large wetland on the west side of
the LID property, the southern half of which has been significantly disturbed and filled. The
Applicant has received a waiver of SAO restrictions against placing an RID facility within a
wetland buffer and is proposing that its water quality treatment cell will function as a constructed
wetland. In addition, the Applicant will remove the fill and replant the wetland and buffer with
native vegetation. Removal of the fill will restore the hydrologic connection between the north
and south portions of the wetland and will allow flows from the wetland to revert to their historic
discharge patterns. Because this wetland discharges to both the northern and southern basins for
the plat, the actual flow patterns after restoration will need to be monitored to determine whether
offsite releases occur as modeled. Runoff discharges to the wetland will also be monitored for
toxicity to assess the efficiency of the water quality treatment system.
6. The SEPA conditions attached to this application require Shamrock to contribute a proportional
share to signal and tum lane improvements at the intersection of SR 9001148th Avenue Southeast
located north of the plat. These improvements will correct a level -of -service F condition and
poor sight distance characteristics, as well as reduce left turns at the SR 9001164th Avenue
Southeast intersection where a high -accident location exists.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. If approved subject to the conditions imposed below, the proposed subdivision makes appropriate
provision for the public health, safety and welfare; serves the public use and interest; and meets
the requirements of RCW 58.17.110. '
2. The conditions of approval imposed herein, including dedications and easements, will provide
improvements that promote legitimate public purposes, are necessary to serve the subdivision and
are proportional to its impacts; are required to make the proposed plat reasonably compatible with
the environment; and will carry out applicable state laws and regulations and the laws, policies
and objectives of King County.
L02P0014 — Shamrock Property Subdivision
DECISION:
Page 4 of 14
The preliminary plat application for Shamrock, as revised and received on February 13, 2004, is
APPROVED, subject to the following conditions of final plat approval:
1. Compliance with all platting provisions of Title 19A of the King County Code.
2. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final
plat a dedication which includes the language set forth in King County Council Motion No. 5952.
3. The plat shall comply with the base density and minimum density requirements of the R-4 zone
classification. All lots shall meet the minimum dimensional requirements of the R-4 zone
218 classification or shall be as shown on the face of the approved preliminary plat, whichever is
larger, except that minor revisions to the plat which do not result in substantial changes may be
approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environmental Services.
4. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads shall be done in accordance with the
King County Road Standards established and adopted by Ordinance No. 11187, as amended
(1993 KCRS).
�( 5. The Applicant must obtain the approval of the King County Fire Protection Engineer certifying
the adequacy of the fire hydrant, water main, and fire flow to meet the standards of Chapter 17.08
of the King County Code.
6. Final plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King
County Code 9.04. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots as
shown on the preliminary approved plat_ Preliminary review has identified the following
conditions of approval, which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other
applicable requirements in KCC 9.04 and the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) must also
be satisfied during engineering and final review.
a. Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water
Design Manual and applicable updates adopted by King County. DDES approval of the
drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction.
b. Current standard plan notes and ESC notes, as established by DDES Engineering
Review, shall be shown on the engineering plans.
C. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat:
All building downspouts, footing drains, and drains from all impervious surfaces such as
patios and driveways shall be connected to the permanent storm drain outlet as shown on
the approved construction drawings # on file with DDES and/or the King
County Department of Transportation. This plan shall be submitted with the application
of any building permit. All connections of the drains must be constructed and approved
prior to the final building inspection approval. For those lots that are designated for
L02POO14 — Shamrock Property Subdivision
Page 5 of 14
individual lot infiltration systems, the systems shall be constructed at the time of the
building permit and shall comply with plans on file."
7. A surface water adjustment (1-04V0003) is approved for this subdivision. All conditions of
approval for this adjustment shall be met upon submittal of the engineering plans. Note that this
adjustment allows the use of low -impact designs for the stormwater facilities on the north portion
of the site. The stormwater facilities shall be constructed in general conformance with the
preliminary grading and storm drainage plan received February 13, 2004; unless otherwise
approved by DDES. The final amended soil design shall be reviewed and approved with the
engineering plans.
8. The stormwater facilities shall meet at a minimum the Level 2 flow control and basic water
quality requirements in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). The
north stormwater detention pond shall be placed in a s arate tract dedic Coun fo
maintenance.
The south stormwater detention facility is within the City of Renton. Engineering plans for the
po�vE construction of this facility shall be approved by Renton.
9. The I00 -year floodplain for any onsite wetlands or streams shall be shown on the engineering
(� plans and the final recorded plat per the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual
( (KCSWDM).
� � t `ill
T ��� 10. The following road improvements are required to be constructed according to the 1993 King
e
c, t� County Road Standards(KCRS):
a. SE 124'x' Street from 146s Ave SE to148a` Ave SE shall be improved to the urban
subcollector street standard.
b. 144th Place SE; 146`'' Ave SE, 146' Ct_ SE(from SE 124"' St. to SE 1215` St); SE 121s'
St.(from 1466 Ct. to 1481' Ave SE); 144' Ave SEISE 1241' St.(frorn thel45'" Ave SE
extra. to 146' Ave SE); shall be improved to the urban subaccess street standard.
C. SE 125" St/I47' Ave SE; 1460 Ct. SE ( from SE 12151 St. to end); 145`'' Ave SE (froze
SE 124' St. to 144` Ave SE); 1441'' Ave SE (from 145x' Ave SE extn. to end); shall be
improved to the urban minor access street standard.
d. FRONTAGE: The site's property frontages along Me Ave SE (west side) shall be
improved to the urban collector arterial standard with sidewalk. The property frontages
(tax lots 9021, 9026, 9170 and 9259) along 148th Ave. SE shall be addressed at
engineering plan submittal, to either provide for a paved shoulder or thickened edge
section. Off-site property owners shall be contacted for design and construction
coordination. The final frontage proposal shall be reviewed and approved by DDES at
engineering design review. The frontage improvements shall be evaluated at engineering
plan submittal for safe walking conditions per the KCRS.
L02POO14 — Shamrock Property Subdivision
Page 6 of 14
e. Tract N shall be improved to the private access tract standard per Section 2.09 of the
KCRS. This tract shall be owned and maintained by the owners of the Iots served. Notes
to this effect shall be shown on the final recorded plat.
Tracts D, J, and M shall be improved as joint use driveways per Section 3.01 of the
KCRS. These driveways shall be owned and maintained by the owners of the Lots
served. Notes to this effect shall be shown on the final recorded plat.
g. That portion of Lot 35, lying within the 30 -feet existing easement for ingress and egress,
—�" shall be dedicated as R/W. A R/W radius shall also be provided at Lot 35 (SE quadrant
144'h PL SE) and at Lot 42 (NW quadrant 1468'Ave SE).
h. Tracts P and Q shall be dedicated as public R/W. Sixteen feet of right-of-way shall be
provided along the northerly portion of lot 35.
i. Right-of-way radius shall be provided as follows — SE corner of lot 42; SW corner of lot
34; NW corner of lot 35; SE corner of lot 26.
Modifications to the above road conditions may be considered according to the variance
procedures in Section 1.08 of the KCRS.
k. Tracts A and C shall be included within the right-of-way.
Road Variance L04VO004 is approved for this project. All conditions of approval for this
variance shall be incorporated into the engineering plans.
m. Details for waiting area for school children along 148h Ave SE shall be determined by
the Applicant and the Issaquah School District, prior to or concurrent with the
engineering plan submittal. Details of this waiting area shall be shown on the
engineering plans and accompanied by correspondence from the School District.
1A 11. All utilities within proposed rights-of-way must be included within a franchise approved by the
King County Council prior to final plat recording.
12. The Applicant or subsequent owner shall comply with King County Code 14.75, Mitigation
Payment System (MPS), by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as determined by
the applicable fee ordinance. The Applicant has the option to either: (1) pay the MPS fee at final
plat recording, or (2) pay the MPS fee at the time of building permit issuance. If the first option
is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of plat application and a note shall be
placed on the face of the plat that reads, "All fees required by King County Code 14.75,
Mitigation Payment System (MPS), have been paid." If the second option is chosen, the fee paid
shall be the amount in effect as of the date of building permit application.
13. Lots within this subdivision are subject to King County Code 21A.43, which imposes impact fees
to fund school system improvements needed to serve new development. As a condition of final
approval, fifty percent (50116) of the impact fees due for the plat shall be assessed and collected
immediately prior to recording, using the fee schedules in effect when the plat receives final
LO2POO14 — Shamrock Property Subdivision
Page 7 of 14
approval. The balance of the assessed fee shall be allocated evenly to the dwelling units in the
plat and shall be collected prior to building permit issuance.
[ 14. Except as modified below in condition no. 15, the proposed subdivision shall comply with the
Sensitive Areas Code as outlined in King County Code 21A.24. Permanent survey marking shall
Cir, _ r5 54"' °" be addressed prior to final plat approval. Temporary marking of sensitive areas and their buffers
P
/"t. S-( is (for example, with bright orange plastic construction fencing) shall be shown on the engineering
K ` �°"s plans and placed on the site and shall remain in place until all construction activities are
completed. Permanent signs identifying the sensitive areas shall be shown on the engineering
plans and installed as part of the plat construction activities.
15. Wetlands
a. Class 2 wetlands shall have a minimum 50 -foot of undisturbed or enhanced native
vegetation. Wetlands and their buffers shall be placed in sensitive area tracts. A
minimum 15 -foot building setback line shall be required from the edge of all sensitive
a�/ S
AT area buffers.
b. Buffer width averaging may be allowed if it will provide additional protection to
EAS, pf�" wetlands or enhance their functions, as long as the total area in buffer does not decrease.
Buffer averaging in conformance with the Code and administrative rules is proposed as
shown on the preliminary plat plans. Buffer reductions of about 6,570 square feet would
be compensated for by providing additional buffer area of about 23,440 square feet.
Additionally, much of the buffer has been degraded by prior activities on the site, and the
project would enhance the native vegetation of these wetland buffers. The enhanced
wetland buffer must provide equal or greater biologic functions, including habitat, and
equivalent or better hydrologic functions.
Post -development wetland hydrology for the smaller, more frequent storm events shall
match pre -development wetland hydrology to the maximum extent feasible.
Calculations, graphs and text shall be included in the Technical Information Report with
the engineering plans to show how this condition will be met, to be reviewed by DDES
Environmental Scientist.
d. Approved alterations to wetlands or their buffers including removal of wetland fill and
enhancement of buffers shall require that a detailed mitigation plan shall be submitted for
review along with the engineering plans. The mitigation plan must include final grades,
hydrologic calculations showing how the mitigation feature will function, and a planting
plan showing plant species, sizes, quantities and locations. The plan shall list goals and
objectives, construction and installation notes, performance standards, and monitoring
and maintenance measures.
e. A conceptual mitigation plan shall be submitted for review along with the engineering
plans for the proposed wetland reconnection area west of the stormwater facility in Tract
H. The conceptual mitigation plan must include proposed grades, hydrologic calculations
showing how the mitigation feature will function, and a planting scheme showing plant
species, sizes and quantities. The plan shall also list goals and objectives, construction
L02P0014 — Shamrock Property Subdivision
Page S of 14
and installation notes, performance standards, and monitoring and maintenance measures.
This plan shall be conceptual to allow for in-tbe-field location of a few channels through
the northern fill area where a young alder forest has grown, leaving some areas of alder
forest to mature. This mitigation area will be shown on the engineering plans as a
concept, with notes requiring field location of the channels in order to protect the larger
and healthier alder trees. An as -built mitigation plan shall be submitted for this wetland
reconnection area west of the proposed stormwater pond in Tract H, following
construction.
Approval of the project wetland mitigation plans will include the requirement for posting
financial guarantee(s) to insure installation and success of the plan. Monitoring for up to
five years from the date of installation shall be required, prior to a final inspection of the
mitigation plan. Monitoring will commence upon a field inspection and approval of the
installed mitigation areas by DDES Environmental Scientist. The financial guarantee(s)
will be released when the performance standards have been met. If the performance
standards have not been met at the conclusion of the monitoring period, a contingency
plan will be required to remedy the situation, and the monitoring period may be extended.
g. The western half (wet pond) of the stormwater facility pond shown in Tract H on the
plans may be located within the wetland and wetland buffer restoration area, and will be
considered restored wetland and wetland buffer as well as a stormwater facility. The wet
r pond shall be landscaped using native species at densities recommended in the Sensitive
Areas Mitigation Guidelines to restore both wetland and buffer habitat. The plan for the
wet pond shall be reviewed by DDES Engineering and Environmental Scientist staff.
The planting plan shall be part of the wetland mitigation plans for the site, and meet the
criteria for those plans specified above.
h.
Post -construction monitoring of the wet pond in the stormwater facility in Tract H will
include monitoring the water quality in the wet pond to evaluate its toxicity to wetland -
dependent wildlife. Post -construction water Ievel fluctuations will also be monitored
along with observations of impacts on amphibians. Monitoring methods and schedule
shall be included with the mitigation plans required above.
i. The Applicant shall prepare an operations and maintenance manual for the wet pond of
the northern stormwater facility, including the vegetation, to provide to either King
County Facilities Maintenance or the Homeowners' Association, depending upon which
group has ownership of the stormwater wet pond. This Manual will be reviewed and
approved by King County DDES Engineer and Environmental Scientist at the time of
engineering plan review.
j_ The following note shall be shown on the final engineering plan and recorded plat:
RESTRICTIONS FOR SENSITIVE AREA TRACTS AND SENSITIVE
AREAS AND BUFFERS
Dedication of a sensitive area tract/sensitive area setback area conveys to the
public a beneficial interest in the land within the tracttsetback area. This interest
L02POO14 — Shamrock Property Subdivision
Page 9 of 14
includes the preservation of native vegetation for all purposes that benefit the
public health, safety and welfare, including control of surface water and erosion,
maintenance of slope stability, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The
sensitive area tract/setback area imposes upon all present and future owners and
occupiers of the land subject to the tract/setback area the obligation, enforceable
on behalf of the public by King County, to leave undisturbed all trees and other
vegetation within the tractisetback area. The vegetation within the tract/setback
area may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or damaged without
approval in writing from the King County Department of Development and
Environmental Services or its successor agency, unless otherwise provided by
law.
The common boundary between the sensitive area tract/sensitive area setback
area and the area of development activity must be marked or otherwise flagged to
the satisfaction of King County prior to any clearing, grading, building
construction or other development activity on a property subject to the sensitive
area tract/setback area. The required marking or flagging shall remain in place
until all development proposal activities in the vicinity of the sensitive area and
buffer are completed.
No building foundations are allowed beyond the required 15 -foot building
setback line, unless otherwise provided by law.
16. Suitable recreation space shall be provided consistent with the requirements of KCC 21 A_14.180
and KCC 21A.14.190 (i.e., sport court[s], children's play equipment, picnic table[s], benches,
etc.) -
a. An overall detailed recreation space plan shall be submitted for review and approval by
— DDES, prior to or concurrent with the engineering plans. This plan shall include
location, area calculations, dimensions, and landscape specs, equipment specs, etc
b. A performance bond for recreation space improvements shall be posted prior to recording
of the plat.
17- A homeowners' association or other workable organization shall be established to the satisfaction
of DDES which provides for the ownership and continued maintenance of the recreation, open
space and/or sensitive area tract(s).
18. Street trees shall be provided as follows (per KCRS 5.03 and KCC 21A.16.050):
a. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all roads.
Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and
intersections. .
b. Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with
Drawing No. 5-009 of the 1993 King County Road Standards, unless King County
L02POo14 — Sharruock Property Subdivision
Page Io of 14
Department of Transportation determines that trees should not be located in the street
right-of-way.
If King County determines that the required street trees should not be located within the
right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line.
d. The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners
association or other workable organization unless the County has adopted a maintenance
program. Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the face of the final recorded
plat.
e. The species of trees shall be approved by DDES if located within the right-of-way, and
shall not include poplar, cottonwood, soft maples, gum, any fruit -bearing trees, or any
other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstruct sanitary or storm sewers, or that is
not compatible with overhead utility lines.
The Applicant shall submit a street tree plan and bond quantity sheet for review and
approval by DDES prior to engineering plan approval.
g. The Applicant shall contact Metro Service Planning at 684-1622 to determine if 148''
Ave SE is on a bus route. If so, the street tree plan shall also be reviewed by Metro.
h_ The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted prior to
recording of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed
and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the
trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be
submitted or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for one
year. After'one year, the maintenance bond maybe released after DDES has completed a
second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving.
19_ The following have been established under SEPA authority as necessary requirements to mitigate
the adverse environmental impacts of this development. The Applicants shall demonstrate
compliance with these items prior to final approval.
a. To mitigate the significant adverse impact the plat of Shamrock will have on the
intersections of SR 9001148'h Ave SE and SR 9001164x` Ave SE, the Applicant shall
install, either individually or in conjunction with other development projects in this area,
the following improvements at the SR 9001148' Ave intersection:
• A traffic signal, and
• Eastbound and westbound left turn lanes
The design for the SR 9001148" Ave intersection improvements shall be approved by the
Washington State Department of Transportation (and by King County to the extent such
improvements are located in County right-of-way). In addition, at a minimum, the
existing entering sight distance looking east for the north and south legs of the
intersection (602 feet and 386 feet, respectively) shall not be reduced as part of the
'b
0
L02PO4I4 — Shamrock Property Subdivision
Page I i of 14
intersection improvements. Documentation shall be submitted to show this requirement
is met. All construction work associated with the intersection improvements shall be
completed between April V and September 30'h. This seasonal restriction shall be
clearly shown on the final engineering plans.
In lieu of the installation of the above -noted intersection improvements prior to final plat
approval, the Applicant may post a financial guarantee with WSDOT which assures the
Vcl�A/FY installation of these improvements within two years of the recording of Shamrock. In
861,CJD w% this event, intersection improvement design must be approved by WSDOT prior to King
LjS Oo County approval of the engineering plans for Shamrock.
OK
VGt�. f F1' tF
b.
6,vrc�vtjC�
516�f7- Dt f?`
If the above -noted intersection improvements have already been made by others prior to
the recording of Shamrock, or a financial guarantee has been posted by others which
assures the installation of these improvements, then the Applicant for Shamrock shall pay
a pro -rata share dollar amount to the developer who has made the improvements or
"bonded" for the improvements, in an amount proportional to the impacts of Shamrock.
The pro -rata share dollar amount to be paid shall be set by WSDOT, and documentation
shall be provided by the Shamrock Applicant to the King County Land Use Services
Division to show this payment has been made, prior to final plat recording. The pro -rata
dollar amount to be paid shall be based on the following:
• The final Shamrock lot count
+ The trip distribution for Shamrock
+ The total trips contributed to the intersection of SR 900.148'' Ave by the plats of
Aster Park (LOOP0024), Stone Ridge 9L99P3008), East Renton (1,02P0005),
Shamrock (1,02P0014), Rosemonte (aka Ironwood -- L03POO18) and any future land
use applications submitted to King County for which compliance with the King
County Intersection Standards (KCC 14.80) is required at either the SR 900/148`
Ave intersection, or the SR 900/164` Ave High Accident Location.
In the event that either King County or WSDOT adopts a formal "latecomer's" system
prior to final plat recording, that system may be followed in lieu of the approach
described above, at the discretion of the Applicant, as long as at a minimum there is a
financial guarantee which assures the above -noted intersection improvements will be
installed within two years of the date of recording of the plat of Shamrock.
[Comprehensive Plan Policy T-303 and King County Code 21A.28.060Aj
Documentation shall be provided to demonstrate to the satisfaction of WSDOT that
stopping sight distance (360 feet) is available on the east leg of the SR 9001148"' Ave
intersection. The intersection shall be modified by the Applicant, if necessary, so that
this stopping sight distance requirement is met on the east leg. In addition, the Applicant
shall clear vegetation within the right-of-way along SR 900, east of 148"' Ave., to
maximize the entering sight distance for the north and south Iegs of the intersection.
[Comprehensive Plan Policy T-303 and King County Comprehensive Policy T-303 and
King County Code 21 A-2 8.060A]
L02POO14 - Shamrock Property Subdivision
21
Page 12 of 14
The northerly portion (north of SE 124th St.) shall comply with the Build Green requirements of
Ordinance 14662 (Low Impact Development). Applicable notes, as necessary shall be shown on
the engineering plans and final plat.
ORDERED this 12th day of May, 2004
King County Hearing Examiner
TRANSMITTED this 12th day of May, 2004, to the parties and interested persons of record:
Terra Behan
William Condrey
Claudia Donnelly
Jeff Foster
Bryant Kelly
Anna Nelson
Sara Slatten
Laura Casey
Kristen Langley
Larry West
Rick Boston
Jeffrey Cox
John Eliason
Mike Fraser
Rebecca Lind
Todd Oberg
Gregg Zimmerman
Kim CIaussen
Carol Rogers
Bruce Whittaker
Eric Campbell
Rebecca Cushman
Pat Flatturn
John Graves
Kenneth Martin
Seattle KC Health Dept.
Greg Borba
Steve Foley
Steve Townsend
In order to appeal the decision of the Examiner, written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of
the King County Council with a fee of $250.00 (check payable to -King County Office of Finance) on or
before May 26, 2004. If a notice of. appeal is filed, the original and six (6) copies of a written appeal
statement specifying the basis for the appeal and argument in support of the appeal must be filed with the
Clerk of the King County Council on or before June 2, 2004. Appeal statements may refer only to facts
contained in the hearing record; new facts may not be presented on appeal.
Filing requires actual delivery to the Office of the Clerk of the Council, Room 1025, King County
Courthouse, 516 3rd Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104, prior to the close of business (4:30 p.m.) on the
date due. Prior mailing is not sufficient if actual receipt by the Clerk does not occur within the applicable
time period. The Examiner does not have authority to extend the time period unless the Office of the
Clerk is not open on the specified closing date, in which event delivery prior to the close of business on
the next business day is sufficient to meet the filing requirement_
If a written notice of appeal and filing fee are not filed within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date of
this report, or if a written appeal statement and argument are not filed within twenty-one (21) calendar
days of the date of this report, the decision of the hearing examiner contained herein shall be the final
decision of King County without the need for further action by the Council.
L02P0014 — 5hanuock Property Subdivision
Page 13 of 14
MINUTES OF THE MAY 6, 2004, PUBLIC HEARING ON DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FILE NO. L02P0014.
Stafford L. Smith was the Hearing Examiner in this matter. Participating in the hearing were Kim
Claussen, Laura Casey, Kristen Langley, Steve Foley and Bruce Whittaker representing the Department;
Sara Slatten representing the Applicant; and Jeffrey L. Cox and Rebecca Cushman.
The following exhibits were offered and entered into the record:
Exhibit No. 1
DDES File No. L02P0014
Exhibit No. 2
DDES Preliminary Report dated May 6, 2004
Exhibit No. 3
Application received August 1, 2002
Exhibit No. 4
Environmental checklist received August 1, 2002
Exhibit No. 5
Mitigated Declaration of Non -significance dated March 26, 2004
Exhibit No. 6
Affidavit of Posting indicating November 18, 2002 as date of posting and
November 18, 2002 as the date the affidavit was received by DDES
Exhibit No_ 7
Plat Map and Conceptual Drainage Plan received by DDES on February 13, 2004
(Revision)
Exhibit No. 8
Concurrency Certificate received August 1, 2002
Exhibit No. 9
Assessors Maps; NE/SE 10-23-05 & SW 11-23-05
Exhibit No. 10
Ordinance No. 14662
Exhibit No. I 1
Low Impact Development Proposal from Triad Associates; received by DDES on
October 8, 2003
Exhibit No. 12
Level I Downstream Analysis by Triad Associates, received by DDES on
August 1, 2002
Exhibit No. 13
Land Use Map
Exhibit No. 14
Revised Level 1 Downstream Analysis by Triad Associates, received by DDES on
January 21, 2004
Exhibit No. 15
Revised Level 1 Downstream Analysis by Triad Associates, received by DDES on
January 26, 2004
Exhibit No. 16
There was no exhibit
Exhibit No. 17
Technical Information Report prepared by Triad Associates, received by DDES on
October 8, 2003
Exhibit No. 18
Traffic Impact Analysis by Garry Struthers Associates, Inc., received by DDES on
August 1, 2002
Exhibit No. 19
Metro from Joan M. Smelser of Garry Struthers dated January 6, 2003; Addendum
Traffic Study
Exhibit No. 20
Memo from Jeff Haynie of Transportation Engineering NorthWest to Kim Claussen
Dated February 12, 2004 on MPS Fee Credits
Exhibit No. 21
Email from Kristen Langley to Kim Claussen and Bruce Whittaker dated
April 28, 2004 re an addendum to the traffic study
Exhibit No_ 22
Letter to Camwest from Paulette Norman dated March 19, 2004 on King County
Road Services Division's on Variance Decision
Exhibit No. 23
Email to Camwest and Kim Claussen from Jeff Lee dated March 22, 2004
On MPS credit
Exhibit No. 24
Wetland Determination prepared by Camwest Development, Inc., received by
DDES on August 1, 2002
L02POO14 — Shamrock Property Subdivision Page 14 of 14
Exhibit No. 25 Letter to Laura Casey form C. Gary Schulz dated October 6, 2003; Addendum
Wetland Study
Exhibit No. 26 Letter to DDES from the City of Renton dated November 27, 2002
Exhibit No. 27 Letter to Sara Slatten and Rebecca Cushman from DDES dated March 25, 2004
Re: drainage adjustment decision
Exhibit No. 28 Revised condition 10 d.
Exhibit No_ 29 PowerPoint Presentation photographs
Exhibit No. 30 Low Impact Development PIan
Exhibit No. 31 Overall site pan
SLS:ms
L02POO14 RPT
MISCELLANEOUS ACQUISITION REQUEST FORM
Person Making Request:
Name: SIeve 4'+ pa -4-eo
Phone: 20 6, 026- 7177
Section:
Division: 29 6
Division File Na.: G D Z f 0 Q /¢-
Division
File or Project Name:
S j am
p ocic
%cls- fS
Division
Charge No., if any:
4 0 ¢FR
0
74 -
Grantors} Information:
Name: CAiyc-j65 1 s%-WX4 f0C//Ef iG ,q 7-S
Address: 7i/V -5-GtKo- S l4L7rff'vI
12-o 7-y �C- SvI Te /ao!ec�crc,�}f�
Phone: Z, Zs--
Property Information:
Section, Township and Range:
Street Name: /�,S 7-14" /PC .
s�%¢ sic is-z-�-
s �-
Tax Account No.: % Z .3 aS /r 0 ¢ D
Request Information: ,P -CC. /✓a, ZOo,S-//0 ¢000777
Reason for Request: /7ar2 1F'L19r /4,PP2aJajc-
1. Property Interest Requested. �Q ipLlAyGC-
Description: SOK. '5 S 1�4, 5 �14- , Ste" ¢
SEC l - 2.3 -,S'—
Acreage
.S'`
Acreage or # of Sq. Ft., if Deed Take:
7. ff
MISCELLANEOUS ACQUISITION REQUEST FORM
Page Com- sE cu
2. Property Interest Requested: v, c�c 14CCi55 l/U r' Ti
Description: PdR • ����¢ Sc�¢ S�4
EC 16 - 2
Acreage or # of Sq. Ft., if Deed Take:
People to Notify Upon Recor
�d
/ing:
1. Name: SQ u -e V c�
Address: email h e /7�c 74 -YO rbc . oV
Phone:
2. Name.
Address:
Phone:
" Name:
Address:
Phone:
4. Name:
Address:
Phone:
Authorized Signature
Date
i A m :.
Transnation
14450 N.E. 29"' PI., #200
Bellevue, WA 98007
Phone: 425-451-7341
800-441-7701
Fax: 425-646-8576
I
LJ
/ �
V
SUPPLEMENTAL NO. 6
TITLE COMMITMENT NO. CS - 20102042
Re: File No.: CS - 20102042 - MT2
Title Officer: Chris Seurti
Reference:
Buyer/Borrower(s): Heritage Homes Inc
Seller(s): Camwest Shamrock Heights, LLC. formerly known as Sha
Subject Property: , Renton, WA
The vesting has been amended to read as follows:
Camwest Shamrock Heights, LLC. formerly known as Shamrock Highlands, LLC.
EXCEPT as to the matters reported herein above, the title to the property covered by this order has NOT
been re-examined.
Dated: November 15, 2005
Transnation Title Insurance Company
By
Authorized Signature
JR1
Supplemental Page 1 of 1
AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO:
King County Real Estate Services
500 4`h Avenue, Room 500A
Seattle, WA 98104
PUBLIC ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT
(Kitsap Ave SE and NE 4TH Court)
Grantor: ilmittinttqos, EL GkWI vw�5T VAMP -05V— t'p-"40TS, tz(- ,
Grantee: KING COUNTY
Legal Description: Ptn SW 1/4 SE'/4 SE 1/410-23-5
[Full Legal Description At Exhibit A]
Tax Account No.: 1023059040
Related Documents: N/A
Grantor, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, for and in
consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys and quitclaims to Grantee, KING COUNTY, a political subdivision
of the state of Washington, and its successors and assigns an easement for public roadway and utility
purposes on, under and across the real property described in the attached Exi11mT A (the "Easement
Area").
The easement is granted subject to the following terms and conditions:
Grantor makes no warranties of any kind, express or implied, to Grantee concerning the
condition of or title to the Easement Area, or the condition of the Improvements within the
Easement Area.
Grantor reserves all rights to use the Easement Area for any and all purposes not inconsistent
with the Easement granted hereby; provided that such reserved rights shall be exercised in a
manner that does not interfere with Grantee's exercise of the rights granted hereby.
The rights and obligations of the parties hereunder shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their
respective successors and assigns.
(Signatures on Following Pages)
EASEMENT PAGE 1
Grantor's Signature Page For Easement
Dated this V day of November, 2005,
GRANTOR:
CAMM;5T',54"KCce-
► kI"�r 4L�.
a Washington limited liability company
By CamWest Development, Inc.
Its Managing Member
By: c� 0
Eric Ca Abel , r ident
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
} ss.
COUNTY OF KING )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Eric Campbell is the person who
appeared before me and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he
was authorized to execute the instrument, and acknowledged it in his capacity as the President of
CamWest Development, Inc., the managing member of -ghwnreek Nighlands, EL6, to be the free and
voluntary act of such entity for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument_
DATED this _ day of November, 2005.
C-0b'►1 VU��
pet4 "rs, fie -
01111i 1ul»,
SL
rq.*,•SStO�y
4piA4r
r
�e.4rweS'`
R4a,,l V4ZZ----1
(Print N4)
Residing at D
-4 WIT
My appointment expires:
IACC- Z
EASF,MESN-1SIGNATURE PAGE
SHAMROCK HEIGHTS e>� H I $/T A TRIAD JOB # 01-159
LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOVEMBER 9, 2005
PUBLIC ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF
PROPOSED NE 4T" CT AND KITSAP AVE. NE, SHAMROCK HEIGHTS II
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,
RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
THENCE SOUTH 00015'26" WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID ONE SIXTYFOURTH SECTION,
A DISTANCE OF 113.05 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 00°15'26" WEST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 42.01
FEET;
THENCE NORTH 88°21'07" WEST A DISTANCE OF 136.04 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00015'26" EAST A DISTANCE OF 155.07 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE
OF SAID ONE SIXTYFOURTH SECTION;
THENCE SOUTH 88020'50" EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 42.01 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00015'26" WEST A DISTANCE OF 78.90 FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 35.00 -FOOT RADIUS TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT THROUGH
A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 88036'33", A DISTANCE OF 54.13 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88021'07" EAST A DISTANCE OF 59.87 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 10,711 SQ. FT. OF LAND MORE OR LESS
WRITTEN: NAY
CHECKED: KBR
S:�,PROJECTS\01 l 59�legals%ESMT PUB 4TH CT.doc
T1 1814 1 15Lh Avenue NE Kirkland, Washington 98034-9623
RLAD42 S.82 1.8448 - 800.488.0756 , Fax 425.82 1 .3481
/'ASSOCIATES www.triadassoc.com
AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO:
King County Real Estate Services
500 4`' Avenue, Room 500A
Seattle, WA 98104
AMENDED PUBLIC STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT
(Kitsap Ave SE)
Grantor: G/tM1/W5T ,5Vb l A,0&V-- OTA5 6 +
Grantee: KING COUNTY
Legal Description: Ptn SW 1/4 SE'/4 SE'/4 10-23-5
[Full Legal Description At Exhibit A]
Taal Account No.: 1023059040
Related Documents: Re-record of 20051104000777
�v►�SrS�M r7-ocic� #� 615
Grantor, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, for and in
consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys and quitclaims to Grantee, KING COUNTY, a political subdivision
of the state of Washington, and its successors and assigns an easement for the installation and
maintenance of a storm water conveyance and detention system (the "Improvements") on, under and
across the real property described in the attached EXHIBIT A (the "Easement Area") together with a right
of ingress and egress to the Easement Area for the purposes of maintenance, repair and replacement of
the Improvements. The easement is granted for the benefit of the real property described'in the attached
EXHIBIT B (the "Benefited Parcel").
The easement is granted subject to the following terms and conditions:
Grantor makes no warranties of any kind, express or implied, to Grantee concerning the
condition of or title to the Easement Area, or the condition of the Improvements within the
Easement Area_
Grantor reserves all rights to use the Easement Area for any and all purposes not inconsistent
with the Easement granted hereby; provided that such reserved rights shall be exercised in a
manner that does not interfere with Grantee's exercise of the rights granted hereby.
This easement supersedes and replaces the easement previously recorded under King County
recording number 20051 I04000777.
The rights and obligations of the parties hereunder shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their
respective successors and assigns.
(Signatures on Following Pages)
FASEMHN-r PAGE, ]
Grantor's Signature Page For Easement
Dated this [k:� day of November, 2005.
GRANTOR:
,
a Washington limited liability company
By CamWest Development, Inc.
Its Managing Member
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
ss.
COUNTY OF KING }
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Eric Campbell is the person who
appeared before me and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he
was authorized to execute the instrument, and acknowledged it in his capacity as the President of
CamWest Development, Inc., the managing member of, o be the free and
voluntary act of such entity for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
DATED this I � 4day of November, 2005. CAMVVC S s#AYA> �-
(Print e)
Residing at'ii
My appointment expires: Q —.)-S-- 0 9
EASEMENT SIGNATURE PACE Z
SHAMROCK HEIGHTS 6xlljl /7- /f TRIAD JOB # 01-159
LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOVEMBER 2, 2005
PUBLIC STORM DRAIN EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF
PROPOSED KITSAP AVENUE NE, SHAMROCK HEIGHTS II
A STRIP OF LAND 10.00 FEET IN EVEN WIDTH LYING 5,00 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,
RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
THENCE NORTH 88020'50" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID ONE SIXTYFOURTH
SECTION, A DISTANCE OF 99.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE LINE
DESCRIBED HEREIN;
THENCE SOUTH 00035'55" WEST A DISTANCE OF 151.14 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°15'26" WEST A DISTANCE OF 249.80 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 26057'28" EAST A DISTANCE OF 16.07 FEET AND THERE ENDING.
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON
WRITTEN: NAY
CHECKED: KBR
S:IPRQJECT5101 15911e9aIS\ESMT PUBLIC SD -1 SH II.cloc
T 11814 11 St, Avenue NE Kirkland, Washington 98034-9623
425.821 .8448 , 800.488.0756 - Fax 425.821 .3481
A S S 0 C[ A T E S
m6w.triadassoc.com
Land Devolopment Consultants
FAGej
SHAMROCK HEIGHTS EX NAA/T A TRIAD JOB # 0 1 -159
LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOVEMBER 2, 2005
PUBLIC STORM DRAIN EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF
PROPOSED NE 4TH COURT, SHAMROCK HEIGHTS 11
A STRIP OF LAND 10.00 FEET IN EVEN WIDTH LYING 5,00 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23
NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
THENCE NORTH 88020'50" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID ONE SIXTYFOURTH
SECTION, A DISTANCE OF 99.78 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00035'55" WEST A DISTANCE OF 151.14 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING OF THE LINE DESCRIBED HEREIN;
THENCE NORTH 87046'35" EAST A DISTANCE OF 27.30 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°42'54" EAST A DISTANCE OF 30.50 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88021'07" EAST A DISTANCE OF 68.15 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 01°38'53" EAST A DISTANCE OF 5.75 FEET AND THERE ENDING;
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON
WRITTEN: NAY
CHECKED; KBR
=0'
S:\PROJECTS\01 159Eiegals�LSMT PUBLIC SD -3 SH Il,doc
T11 81 4 11511 Avenue NE Kirkland, Washington 98034-9623
RLAD425.821.8448 - 800.488.0756 - Fax 425.821.3481
A S S O C I A T E S www.triadassoc.com
DevelopmentLand
PAGC
SHAMROCK HEIGHTS E1(/a//3/ r TRIAD JOB # 01-159
LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOVEMBER 2, 2005
PUBLIC STORM DRAIN EASEMENT OVER
PROPOSED TRACT R, SHAMROCK HEIGHTS II
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23
NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
THENCE SOUTH 00015`24" WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID ONE SIXTYFOURTH
SECTION, A DISTANCE OF 413.55 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 00015'30" WEST A DISTANCE OF 203.14 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 88021'07" WEST A DISTANCE OF 330.34 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00014'28" EAST A DISTANCE OF 197.76 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89017'06" EAST A DISTANCE OF 330.31 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON
WRITTEN: NAY
CHECKED; KBR
�1 x y4A
S'1PROJECTS\0115911egalslESMT PUBLIC SD -2 5H il.doc
T 11 814 11 S=^ Avenue NE Kirkland, Washington 98034-9623
425.821.8448 - 800.488.0756 • Fax 425.821.3481
ASSOCIATES www.triadassoc.com
Land Developmentr
PA,FS
EXHIBIT B: DESCRIPTION OF BENEFITED PARCEL
PARCEL A
THE EAST 266.04 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,
RANGE 5 EAST, W.M.;
EXCEPT THE EAST 50 FEET OF THE NORTH 16 FEET OF SAID PROPERTY;
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
PARCEL B
THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M_;
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
EnsEt FNT
,epGE 6
Euirm-fs
SOC
VanPatten, Steve
From: VanPatten, Steve
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 7:56 AM
To: 'Nick Yinger'
Subject: SHAMROCK PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENT
Page 1 of 1
Nick,
Are you guys doing the Renton plat? Can you fax or email me a copy of the map page of the plat so that I can
follow the legal for the public drainage easement?
fax no. is 296-6613.
--thanks
11/10/2005
VanPatten, Steve
From: VanPatten, Steve
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 8:24 AM
To: Thompson, Carol
Subject: Shamrock Heights 1 LL02P0014 King County Drainage easement
Carol,
I am working on a plat called Shamrock Heights 1. This plat requires an off-site public drainage easement that was
supposed to be in dedicated right of way as part of a City of Renton plat that was supposed to record prior to Shamrock
Ht.s. Anyway I just found out the applicant decided to record Shamrock Heights 1 first and they recognized that King
County will need an easement for the off-site facilities -- so they recorded an easement without informing me_ Anyway, I
am reviewing the document and hopefully it will be ok. Its recorded under 20051104000777_ They will also need to record
a public access easement through the proposed Renton plat which I will get to review before they record it. I will forward to
you Acquisition Request form for the recorded Drainage easement (assuming it is acceptable) and for the proposed
access easement sometime between today and next Tuesday. The documents need to be approved 1 recorded before
Shamrock Hts 1 -- which may record by the 22. Is there anything else you will be needing?
--thanks
VanPatten, Steve
From: VanPatten, Steve
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 2:15 PM
To: 'Nick Yinger'
Subject: Shamrock drainage easement FW: Scanned document <5 pages --158 KBS -- 11/10/2005
2:00:49 PM
esmt,pdf (158 KB)
ick
See attached redlines. I am not sure about the exact verbiage for the re-recording, but
it should have at minimum the word supersedes. You may want Sara to check with her
attorney for the language. The "Return Address" is required by real properties. Please
forward either a copy of the revised document to me for review or if you prefer, the
actual document to be recorded. Please don't give me the actual signed document for the
other "public access easement" document until I have reviewed a draft copy. Both
documents, together with a bunch of other paperwork will need to be taken into real
properties for recording.
--thanks
-----Original Message -----
From: DDES Ecopy
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 2:01 PM
To: VanPatten, Steve
Subject: Scanned document <5 pages -158 KB> -- 11/10/2005 2:00:49 PM
This PDF file was created using the eCopy Suite of products. For more information about
how you can eCopy paper documents and distribute them by email please visit
http://www.ecopy.com
1
SOC
VanPatten, Steve
... ... ........
From: VanPatten, Steve
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 10:29 AM
To: 'Sara Slatten'
Cc: 'Nick Yinger'
Subject: RE: Shamrock: Revised Easement
Page 1 of 1
Sara,
Because the grantee is King County, this document and the revised public storm drainage easement needs to be
reviewed by us and go thru Real properties prior to recording. Therefore please route the signed documents to
me and I will take them in with the plat for recording. The re-recording of the water easement in the 16' strip can
be recorded ASAP by you.
Anyway, for this document please revise "Soom" to "Room" in the return address. Also remove "municipal
corporation" in the fourth sentence of the main body and insert "political subdivision of the state of " in front of
"Washington" in the 3rd sentence.
A sketch with the surveyors stamp would have been good to include as an exhibit B, but is not necessary.
Nick,
Regarding the revised "Public storm drainage easement" document -- please remove the "municipal corporation"
verbiage and insert "political subdivision of the state of " -- which I missed in my original redlines that I emailed to
you the other day.
---thanks
-----Original Message -----
From: Sara Slatten [mailto:ssiatten@camwest.comj
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 9:37 AM
To: VanPatten, Steve
Subject: Shamrock: Revised Easement
Importance: High
Steve,
Can you please take a look at the revised easement and confirm that this is acceptable before I re-record?
Also, I wanted to confirm that you now have the revised plat as well?
Thanks,
Sara Slatten
CamWest Development
(425) 826-1955; phone
(425)825-1565; fax
www.camwest.com
e<Easement 4.Public Access and Utilities. Phase 2.doc»
11/15/2005
ATTEF
7N�k16 Sara Sl
RIKRT j CamW
J 9720 N
Kirkr
Grantor:
Grantee:
CONFORMED CORY
ECORbING MAM TO: 20051104000777
SHAMROCK HIGHL EAS 38.00
PAGE001 OF 004
e.1 11/0412006 10:43
/f KING COUNTY, WA
,bewelopment, Inc. AP P A C -S )
120'b Place, Suite 100 kir c couw Fr f (5k( C_ STf T C— Tt�A U r C � J
WA 9$034 A vEwoC Xm . S-(DoA
Legal Description:
PUBLIC STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT
(Kitsap Ave SE)
SHAMROCK HIGHLANDS, LLC
KING COUNTY
Ptn SW'/4 SE 1/4 SE 1/4 10-23-5
[Full Legal Description At Exhibit A]
Tax Account No_: 1023059040
C,
/5 A )�_6 - X C C6r-P1I .�- 0 /,:--
Related Documents: N/A f vW 0 C:
Grantor, SHAMROCK HIGHLANDS, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, for and in � �0
consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is 141
hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys and quitclaims to Grantee, KING COUNTY,ashington -7 -2and its successors and assigns an easement for the installation an aintenance
of a storm water conveyance and detention system (the "Improvements") on, under and across the real
property described in the attached EX [Brr A (the "Easement Area") together with a right of ingress and
egress to the Easement Area for the purposes of maintenance, repair and replacement of the
Improvements. The easement is granted for the benefit of the real property' described in the attached
EXMIT B (the "Benefited Parcel").
The easement is granted subject to the following terms and conditions:
Grantor makes no warranties of any kind, express or implied, to Grantee concerning the
cosndkion of or title to the Easement Area, or the, w-ondition of the improvements within the
Easement Area.
Grantor reserves all rights to use the Easement Area for any and all purposes not inconsistent
with the Easement granted hereby; provided that such reserved rights shall be exercised in a
manner that does not interfere with Grantee's exercise of the rights granted hereby.
fGrantee shall, at its ow ost, maintain the Improvements in good condition.
Tpon the recording o proposed plat of Shamrock Heights II, Grantee shall execute and
record an instrument to ating this easement.
The rights and obligations of the parties hereunder shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their
respective successors and assigns.
(Signatures on Following Pages)
-rc- /4 D A /i S fr r C I -f w (T -P
S T,4 Ga( �O
EAsamENT �� — ll (1 `f 'PAGE 1
Grantor's Signature Page For Easement
Dated this .*5' day of November, 2005.
M-11T.-Iff !
SHAMROCK McTHLANDs, LLC.,
a Washington limited liability company
By CamWest Development, Inc.
Its Managing Member
By: I-J�lf
o�-
Eric C pbell, esident
STATE OF WASHINGTON }
} ss.
COUNTY OF KING )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Eric Campbell is the person who
appeared before me and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he
was authorized to execute the instrument, and acknowledged it in his capacity as the President of
CamWest Development, Inc., the managing member of Shamrock Highlands, LLC, to be the free and
voluntary act of such entity for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
DATED this day of November, 2005.
0 XAOTA q�- 9s�
;cls:, �°UBI..IG �2 •
(Print Name) 5. Y
Residing at �4lllC} A -
My appointment expires: l ' 2 7—Z)S
EASEMENT SIGNATURE PAGE
EXHIBIT A: DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT AREA
PARCEL A
A STRIP OF LAND 10.00 FEET IN EVEN WIDTH LYING 5.00 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THESOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,
RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
THENCE NORTH 88020'50" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID ONE SIXTYFOURTH
SECTION, A DISTANCE OF 99.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE LINE
DESCRIBED HEREIN;
THENCE SOUTH 00035'55" WEST A DISTANCE OF 151.14 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°15'26" WEST A DISTANCE OF 249.80 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 26057'28" EAST A DISTANCE OF 16.07 FEET AND THERE ENDING.
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
PARCEL B
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,
RANGE 5 EAST, W.M_, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
THENCE SOUTH 00015'24" WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID ONE SIXTYFOURTH
SECTION, A DISTANCE OF 413.55 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 00015'30" WEST A DISTANCE OF 203.14 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 88021'07" WEST A DISTANCE OF 330.34 FEET,-
THENCE
EET;THENCE NORTH 00014'28" EAST A DISTANCE OF 197.76 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89017'06" EAST A DISTANCE OF 330.31 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
PARCEL C
A STRIP OF LAND 10.00 FEET IN EVEN WIDTH LYING 5.00 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,
RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
THENCE. NORTH 88020'50" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID ONE SIXTYFOURTH
SECTION, A DISTANCE OF 99.78 FEET;
EAs rrr Exmm]TS
THENCE SOUTH 00035'55' WEST A DISTANCE OF 151.14 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING OF THE LINE DESCRIBED HEREIN;
THENCE NORTH 87046'35" EAST A DISTANCE OF 27.30 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00042'54" EAST A DISTANCE OF 30.50 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88021'07" EAST A DISTANCE OF 68.15 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 01 038'53" EAST A DISTANCE OF 5.75 FEET AND THERE ENDING;
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
S r� v�
�Ir I
U
EASEMENT EXH38ITs
EXHIBIT B: DESCRIPTION OF BENEFITED PARCEL
PARCEL A
THE EAST 266.04 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,
RANGE 5 EAST, W.M.;
EXCEPT THE EAST 50 FEET OF THE NORTH 16 FEET OF SAID PROPERTY;
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
PARCEL B
THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M.;
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
EASE DUUBIT5
14450 N,E, 29" PI., #200
LandAmerica Bellevue, WA 98007
Phone: 425-451-7301
Transnation 800-441-7701
Fax: 425-646-8576
ll FfJl GU
SUPPLEMENTAL NO. NO. 6
TITLE COMMITMENT NO. CS - 20102042
Re: File No.: CS - 20102042 - MT2
Title Officer: Chris Scurti
Reference:
Buyer/Borrower(s): Heritage Homes Inc
Seller(s): Camwest Shamrock Heights, LLC. formerly known as Sha
Subject Property: , Renton, WA
The vesting has been amended to read as follows:
Camwest Shamrock Heights, LLC. formerly known as Shamrock Highlands, LLC.
EXCEPT as to the matters reported herein above, the title to the property covered by this order has NOT
been re-examined.
Dated: November 15, 2005
JR1
Supplemental
Transnation Title Insurance Company
ay
Authorized Signature
Page 1 of 1
VanPatten, Steve
From: Sara Slatten [sslatten@camwest.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 10:15 AM
To: VanPatten, Steve
Subject: FW: File Number 20102042
i
Page 1 of 1
Steve,
Attached is an update to title report for the Renton plat which indicates the recording of the recent storm / ROW
easements. I will try and call you shortly to confirm that this is what you need.
Thanks,
Sara
-----Original Message -----
From: Fooks, Shelley [mailto:SFooks@Landam•com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 9:56 AM
To: Sara Slatten
Subject: File Number 20102042
<<Attachment.doc»
11/15/2005
. 14450 N.E. 291h PI., #200
Bellevue, WA 98007
Phone: 425-451-7301
Transnation 800-441-7701
Fax: 425-646-8576
Re: File No.:
Title Officer:
Reference:
Buyer/Borrower(s)
Seller(s):
Subject Property:
SUPPLEMENTAL NO. 5
TITLE COMMITMENT NO. CS - 20102042
CS - 20102042 - MT2
Chris Scurti
Heritage Homes Inc
CamWest Development Inc
, Renton, WA
Special Exception No's 48, 49 and 40 are added as follows:
48. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GRANTEE:
SHAMROCK HIGHLANDS LLC
PURPOSE:
PRIVATE STORM DRAINAGE
AREA AFFECTED:
PARCELS A AND B
RECORDED:
NOVEMBER 4, 2005
RECORDING NO.:
20051104000775
49. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GRANTEE:
SHAMROCK HIGHLANDS LLC
PURPOSE:
PRIVATE STORM DRAINAGE
AREA AFFECTED:
PARCELS A AND B
RECORDED:
NOVEMBER 4, 2005
RECORDING NO.:
20051104000776
50. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS
AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GRANTEE:
PURPOSE:
AREA AFFECTED:
RECORDED:
RECORDING NO.:
SLF
Supplemental
KING COUNTY
PUBLIC STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT
PARCELS A AND B
NOVEMBER 4, 2005
20051104000777
Page i of 2
Order No_
.-r
EXCEPT as to the matters reported herein above, the title to the property covered by this order has NOT
been re-examined.
Dated: November 15, 2005
Transnation Title Insurance Company
sy
Authorized Signature
SLF
Supplemental Page 2 of 2
AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO:
King County Real Estate Services
5004 1h Avenue Soo 500A
Seattle, WA 981
nn
PUBLIC ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT
(Kitsap Ave SE and NE 4T" Court)
Grantor: SHAMROCK HIGHLANDS, LLC
Grantee: KrN(; COUNTY
Legal Description: Ptn SW'/4 SE'/4 SE'/4 10-23-5
[Full Legal Description At Exhibit A]
(LA
Tax
Ir{bLA
Tax Account No.: 1023054040 S O (J c 5
Related Documents: NIA 6Y
a�
Grantor, SHAMROCK HIGHLANDS, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, kor and in
consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, receipt�of which is
hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys and quitclaims to Grantee, KING COUNTY, a ashington
, and its successors and assigns an easement for pu blic roadway and utility
purposes on, under and across the real property described in the attached EXHIBIT A (the "Easement
Area").
The easement is granted subject to the following terms and conditions:
Grantor makes no warranties of any kind, express or implied, to Grantee concerning the
condition of or title to the Easement Area, or the condition of the Improvements within the
Easement Area.
Grantor reserves all rights to use the Easement Area for any and all purposes not inconsistent
with the Easement granted hereby; provided that such reserved rights shall be exercised in a
manner that does not interfere with Grantee's exercise of the rights granted hereby.
The rights and obligations of the parties hereunder shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their
respective successors and assigns.
(Signatures on Following Pages)
EASEMENT PAGE
Grantor's Signature Page For Easement
Dated this day of November, 2005,
GRANTOR:
SHAMROCK HIGHLANDS, LLC.,
a Washington limited liability company
By CamWest Development, Inc.
Its Managing Member
By:
Eric Campbell, President
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
ss.
COUNTY OF KING )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Eric Campbell is the person who
appeared before me and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he
was authorized to execute the instrument, and acknowledged it in his capacity as the President of
CamWest Development, Inc., the managing member of Shamrock Highlands, LLC, to be the free and
voluntary act of such entity for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
DATED this day of November, 2005.
(Print Name)
Residing at
My appointment expires:
EASEMINT SIGNATURE PAGE
EXHIBIT A: DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT AREA
SHAMROCK HEIGHTS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
TRIAD JOB # 01-159
NOVEMBER 9, 2005
PUBLIC ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF
PROPOSED NE 47H CT AND KITSAP AVE. NE, SHAMROCK HEIGHTS II
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,
RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
THENCE SOUTH 0001526" WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID ONE SIXTYFOURTH SECTION,
A DISTANCE OF 113.05 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 00015'26" WEST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 42.01
FEET;
THENCE NORTH 88°21'07" WEST A DISTANCE OF 136.04 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 0001526" EAST A DISTANCE OF 155.07 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE
OF SAID ONE SIXTYFOURTH SECTION;
THENCE SOUTH 88020'50" EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 42,01 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°15'26" WEST A DISTANCE OF 78.90 FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 35.00 -FOOT RADIUS TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT THROUGH
A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 88°36-33", A DISTANCE OF 54.13 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88021'07" EAST A DISTANCE OF 59.87 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 10,711 SQ. FT. OF LAND MORE OR LESS
WRITTEN: NAY
CHECKED: KBR
rr ,v9 -C)5
EASEMENT EXHIBITS
Loa
King County
Department of Development
and Environmental Services
Land Use Services Division
900 Oakesdaie Avenue Southwest
Renton, Washington 98055-1219
(206) 296-6600 TTY (206) 296-7217
Alternative formats available
upon request
Drop -Off Cover Sheet for Land Use Services Division
****k**k*###*#************** IMPORTANT ***************r##r***k******
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME IS NECESSARY Date Received by LUSD
FOR ALL DROP-OFFS
Project No.: LC_.: -2 1 1 C�: f `
C�-.
Project Name: 7 �% NGV c
FROM:
Company Name / Contact Person
Telephone No.: '2 L) Li
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY KING COUNTY STAFF (please print)
Short Plat f Plats
Pleases ecify item(s) dropped -o
_ e, A A 'C Sc_
Lot Line Ad"ustment Permit
Please specify item(s) dropped -off:
Ri ht of Way Permit
Please specify item(s) dropped -off:
Clearing/ Grading Permit
Additional information requested; please specify item(s) dropped -off:
Other:
1Cv-� r, �-- 1' k
PLEASE NOTE: All drop-off item(s) will be logged into the computer under the project number, therefore, it is
important that the top portion of this form is completed properly before you drop-off anything. Assistance in finding a
project number can be provided by speaking to a Land Use Services Division Person of the Day (POD) or the
Zoning/Land Use Technician. Your cooperation is important. Thank you.
LUSD Drop -Off Cover Sheet ig-cvs-dropoff.pdf 05-30-2002 Page t of 1
AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO:
King County Real Estate Services
500 4'J` Avenue, Room 500A
Seattle, WA 98104
AMENDED PUBLIC STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT
(Kitsap Ave SE)
Grantor: 9, CAlm
„v�'1—
Grantee: KING COUNTY
Legal Description: Ptn SW'/4 SE'/4 SE'/4 10-23-5
[Full Legal Description At Exhibit A]
Tax Account No.: 1023059040
Related Documents: Re-record of 20051104000777
Grantor, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, for and in
consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys and quitclaims to Grantee, KING COUNTY, a political subdivision
of the state of Washington, and its successors and assigns an easement for the installation and
maintenance of a storm water conveyance and detention system (the "Improvements") on, under and
across the real property described in the attached EXHIBIT A (the "Easement Area") together with a right
of ingress and egress to the Easement Area for the purposes of maintenance, repair and replacement of
the Improvements. The easement is granted for the benefit of the real property described in the attached
EXHu3n, B (the "Benefited Parcel").
The easement is granted subject to the following terms and conditions:
Grantor makes no warranties of any kind, express or implied, to Grantee concerning the
condition of or title to the Easement Area, or the condition of the Improvements within the
Easement Area.
Grantor reserves all rights to use the Easement Area for any and all purposes not inconsistent
with the Easement granted hereby; provided that such reserved rights shall be exercised in a
manner that does not interfere with Grantee's exercise of the rights granted hereby.
This easement supercedes and replaces the easement previously recorded under King County
recording number 20051104000777.
The rights and obligations of the parties hereunder shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their
respective successors and assigns.
(Signatures on Following Pages)
EASEMENT PAGE 1
Grantor's Signature Page For Easement
Dated thiseday of November, 2005.
GRANTOR:
Cr SHAM txcv- w(61FTS, LLC
a Washington limited liability company
By Cam West Development, Inc.
Its Managing Member
By:
Eric CaWpbell, FW4ident
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
ss.
COUNTY OF KING )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that .Eric Campbell is the person who
appeared before me and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he
was authorized to execute the instrument, and acknowledged it in his capacity as the President of
CamWest Development, Inc., the managing member of gh&nreek 11ighkwAw I LC, to be the free and
voluntary act of such entity for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
DATED this f 'day of November, 2005. CAM�S4MM 4
(Print N e) S'
Residing at gEPT4,01,Jn WA—
My appointment expires: 0 —.DL S- 0A
EASEMENT SIGNATURE PAGE
EXHIBIT A: DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT AREA
EASEMENT EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT B: DESCRIPTION OF BENEFITED PARCEL
PARCEL A
The East 266.04 Feet of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.;
Except the East 50 feet of the north 16 feet of Said Property;
Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington.
PARCEL B
The East Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 10,
Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.;
Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington.
EASLMLNC EXHBFS
SHAMROCK HEIGHTS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
TRIAD JOB # 01-159
NOVEMBER 15, 2005
PUBLIC ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF
PROPOSED NE 4T" CT AND KITSAP AVE. NE, SHAMROCK HEIGHTS II
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,
RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
THENCE SOUTH 00015'26" WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID ONE SIXTYFOURTH SECTION,
A DISTANCE OF 113.05 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 00°15'26" WEST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 42.01
FEET;
THENCE NORTH 88021'07" WEST A DISTANCE OF 136.04 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00015'26" EAST A DISTANCE OF 155.07 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE
OF SAID ONE SIXTYFOURTH SECTION;
THENCE SOUTH 88020'50" EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 42.01 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°15'26" WEST A DISTANCE OF 78.90 FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 35.00 -FOOT RADIUS TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT THROUGH
A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 88°36'33", A DISTANCE OF 54-13 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88021'07" EAST A DISTANCE OF 59.87 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON
CONTAINING 10,711 SQ. FT. OF LAND MORE OR LESS
WRITTEN: NAY
CHECKED: KBR
rr • ���' ori
S:IPROJECTS1,0I 1 5911egals\ESMT PUB 4TH CT.doc
TRLAD 1 1 814 1 1 5t^ Avenue NE Kirk;and, Washington 98034-9623
425.823,8448 • 800.489,0756 - Fax 425.821.3481
ASSOCIATES www.Lriadassoc.com
Land Development
EXHIBIT A: DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT AREA
SHAMROCK HEIGHTS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
TRIAD JOB # 01-159
NOVEMBER 9, 2005
PUBLIC ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF
PROPOSED NE 4TH CT AND KITSAP AVE. NE, SHAMROCK HEIGHTS II
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,
RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
THENCE SOUTH 00'15'26" WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID ONE SIXTYFOURTH SECTION,
A DISTANCE OF 113.05 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 0001526" WEST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 42.01
FEET;
THENCE NORTH 88021'07" WEST A DISTANCE OF 136.04 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°15'26" EAST A DISTANCE OF 155.07 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE
OF SAID ONE SIXTYFOURTH SECTION;
THENCE SOUTH 88020'50" EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 42.01 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00615'26" WEST A DISTANCE OF 78.90 FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 35.00 -FOOT RADIUS TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT THROUGH
A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 88°36'33", A DISTANCE OF 54.13 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88021'07" EAST A DISTANCE OF 59.87 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 10,711 SQ. FT. OF LAND MORE OR LESS
WRITTEN: NAY
CHECKED: KBR
// -09-0«
EASEMENT EXHIBITS