HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA-01-165_Report 1NOTICE OF APPLICATION
A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City
of Renton, The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals,
PROJECT NUMBER/NAME:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT LOCATION:
PUBLIC APPROVALS:
APPLICANT/PROJECT
CONTACT PERSON:
LUA-D1-165, CPA, R, ECF; WSDDT Carr Road CPA #2003-M-1
This City sponsored proposal is to change the Comprehensive Plan land Use
Map designation as well as the zoning designations for portions of a .:!: 55-acre.
The land use designations would change from Residential Rural to a combination
of Residential Rural (RR). Residential Options (RO), and Residential Single
Family (RS). Zoning would change from R-1 to a combination of R-10 (10 du/net
acre), R-5 (5 du/net acre), and R-8 (8 dulnet acre),
The.:!: 55-acre site is located south of Carr Road/S 179111 Street and east of Talbot
Road South.
Environmental Review, Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone
City of Renton, EDNS? OepUOon Erickson, Project Manager
Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Don Erick.son, Project Manager, Strategic Planning
Division, EDNSP Department. 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on August 22M
, 2003. If you
have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notlfleation by mail,
contact Don Erickson at (425) 430-6581. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of
record and wijl be notified of any decision on this project.
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION
DATE OF APPLICATION:
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION:
DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION:
December 17, 2001
January 15, 2003
August 8, 2003
. 10r-.
-! --,
'!!' <;t
t.'
00 0,
• N
If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on th is proposed project, complete this form
and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055.
File NoJName: LUA-01-165, CPA, R, ECF; WSDOT CARR ROAD CPA#2003·M-1
NAME: ______________________________________________________________ __
ADDRESS: ____________________________________________________________ __
TELEPHONE NO,: __________________________ _
NOTICE OF APPUCA TI01.doc
.. sw 1.j~ .. J ...... .. _______ Sr·
-r-
I
I
'-·1
f'f)··Jv?
.~ .
-I
~(
VlI
I
1
I~Fe CITY OF RENTON
:! Planning/Building/Public Works ., if
-~ ,,'" 0" ",.
~"
r 7f'-~fiaFiii. jFi'i ~6 ~'~>~~11i 7;' ~~ ;It 1055 South Grady Way -Renton Washington 98055De\t~
CIfY OF F1efht!/lll/VG
AUG 19 2003
85591005300~l:~l:(}fl:£)
L1MBACHER JILL AN
400 S 46TH PL #C
RENTON WA 98055
F' c; f~ i._:E:: i-·iF;· qlt\ 1'1F=;!':i: '39t~7"!f.~~-
01 ~ I~
LIMSQOO 980552033 1502 21 oe/~q/03
FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND
LIMBAC~ER'UILL A
2209 TYLER CT ANTIOCH CA 94S0q-S76~
RETURN TO SENDER
11,1. ,1,,1,11 11"1,1,,1,1,,.11,1 "f ,., :~:: t;/:; ;It::;i;,.;:tt:: :t;", J.1 ;;'.-r ,-It::
--""r--
I
WSDOT -Carr Rd. (2003-M-01) Fig.1-Vicnity Map
+ AID + Sue Carlson. Administrator -Study Area
e Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning ---Corporate Boundary
~ O. Del Rosano
29 July 2002
o 800 1600 1 .
I : I'
1:9600 /
/
I'
---------,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
!
)
/
WSDOT -Carr Rd.
---
/ /l
/ --I
/ ~ I L/
(2003-M-Ol) Fig .l-Vicnity Map
- - -Corp orate Boundary
--Study Area
o 800 1600
~~~~§~~~'
1 : 9600
WSDOT -Carr Rd. (2003-M-01) Fig .2-Aerial Map
Economic Development, Ne ighborhoods & Siralcgic Plannin g
Alex Pic l:-.c h. Administrator
G. Dd Rosario
3 July 2003
- - -Corporate Boundary
--Study Area
o 300 600
1 : 7200
. ,
;11 . / .
1
. .:.-/' -
'f
<
f
>~ ro
-
~
~:t ' L ) • : I ~.
/' , .
... J~-.
t,I',
I
".\~>
,!
' , \. " ~ . . ,
.,'\1 ' .
I '1 -1.'
II ~... ~,
,,::-;-:s£: -"' / J!~';:! :.~ _ M • ~
.... , ---.._. \'\411 11 'fl . ___ ~ ... '_~-... ".,' ~
•
'\' 1 , 't
'-" 1\ \ ,\,
"
1------"----
r
I
...
,
~.
/
I
WSDOT -Carr Rd. (2003-M-01) Fig.3-Topography Map
Eco no mic Deve lopme nt , Neighborhoods & S tra tegic Pla nning
Alex Piel:-ch, Admini,tr:l.1or
G. Del Rosario
.3 Ju l y 2003
-- -Corporate Boundary
-Study Area
f ,
I' •
(.' I ..
" , .
\,'<..':--,
I \ l .:
~' j
j
1)1
, l I
,"';'
'.
.'\;,r ":"0.
\.
I
o 300
1 : 7200
600
5 ill
"
I
/
/
./ -----
/
/'
/' A'
./ <;? ~/
/' ."fIj
~
/"-'~ , \.
1 ~!
o
\ ~ h
\ )::i.. ..... , \ ~-.
;
.I
/ ,
;
""~' , . ,
t.,../ i
I .,': ,v
r~
; " .... ...". ... '
I f
./ 1 ~ /
i
WSDOT -Carr Rd.
.-.,;,;:...,,...-
U-;'
"
/ .'
1-------
I
I
I
I
(2003-M-01) FigA-Sensitive Areas ---Corporate Boundary
--Study Area
-Slide Hazzard Boundary
--Ditch /Creek
-> 40 % Slope
/;7/
j~\~~r. . '. -" .
. ..•. . . ,._'::
o 300 600
t ! I
1 : 7200
COCP)
(
~-~" Jf..... ./
co co
CD COCP)
<;" RM-I
'Co-,.{r~. '" .
R-14
WSDOT -Carr Rd.
/
.~
I' . R-10
R-8 R-10
R-l
(2003-M-01) Fig.5-Existing Landuse and Zoning o 500 1000
t ! j
c:::::J CI ·C enter Institution
~ CS-Center Suburban
c:::::::J APN-Residentia l Planned Neighborhocxl 1 : 6000
~ RM -I-Residential Multi-Family lnfill
c::::::J AO·Residential Opt ion s
G:m AR-Aesidential Rura l
c::::::::J AS ·R esidentia l Single Family = Sleep Slopes
--Corporate Boundary
--Study Area
CO(p)
co co
) co I I CO( P)
R~-I
R-14
WSDOT -Carr Rd.
R-8
CO(P)
R-10
II A II
II B 1/
(2003 -M-01) Fig.7-Staff Proposal-Landuse and Zoning o 500 1000
I I 1
G::::::) CI ·Ce nter In stitution
W&ill CS-Ce nter Suburban
~ AM-i-Res idential Multi-Fam ily In fill
c:::::J RO ·Res ident ial Options
c::=J RPN-Res idential Planned Ne ighborhood 1 : 6000 tmm:I AR-Residential Aural
c:::::J RS-Resident ial Sin gle Family
c;::;] Steep Slopes
--Corporate Boundary
--Study Area
LAKE WASHINGTON
Comprehensive Plan Amendment 02-T-02-1 and 02-M-05
Commercial and Mixed Use Designation Policies e Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
+ tR + Sue Carlson, Administrator
~ G. Del Rosario
'1' 17 December 2001
...... VVhatever
- -Existing Corporate Boundary
o 2500 5000
~ iiiiiiiiiiiil~~~1
1 :30,000
CITY OF RENTON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
Date:
To:
From:
MEMORANDUM
October 28, 2010
City Clerk's Office
Stacy M Tucker
Subject: Land Use File Closeout
Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City
Clerk's Office
Project Name: WSDOT Carr Road Comp Plan Amendment
LUA (file) Number: LUA-01-165, ECF, CPA, R
Cross-References:
AKA's:
Project Manager: Don Erickson
Acceptance Date: January 15, 2003
Applicant: City of Renton
Owner: WSDOT
Contact: Don Erickson, EDNSP -City of Renton
PIDNumber: 3123059083, 3123059084, 3223059183, 3223059187
ERC Decision Date: September 23, 2003
ERC Appeal Date: October 13, 2003
Administrative Denial:
Appeal Period Ends:
Public Hearing Date:
Date Appealed to HEX:
By Whom:
HEX Decision: Date:
Date Appealed to COuncil:
By Whom:
Council Decision: Date:
Mylar Recording Number:
Project Description: Request for Environmental Review for a City initiated proposal to change the
Comprehensive land use designation of a ± 55-acre site from Residentional Rural to a combination
of Residential Rural (RR), Residential Options (RO), and Residental Single-Family (RS). Zoning
would change from R-1 to a combination of R-10 R-5, and R-B.
Location: South of Carr Road/S 179th Street and east of Talbot Road S
Comments:
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 5046
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
CHANGING THE WNING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN
PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM RESIDENTIAL
1 DUlAC WNING TO RESIDENTIAL 10 DUlAC ZONING. FILE NO.
LUA-01-165, 2003-M-Ol (WSDOT CARR RD -SITE A).
WHEREAS, under Section 4-2-020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts -Uses and Standards,
of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 known as the "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in
conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has previously been zoned as
Residential 1 dulac (R-l); and
WHEREAS, the City of Renton initiated a proceeding for change of zone classification
of said property; and
WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation,
study, and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about October 15,
2003, and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and said zoning
request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City
Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard
appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto;
NOW, THEREFORE,· THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby
rezoned to Residential Option (R-lO), as hereinbelow specified. The Neighborhood and
ORDINANCE NO. 5046
Strategic Planning Division is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning
Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit:
See Exhibits "A" and US" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth
herein. (property consisting ofapproximately 13.88 acres located south of S. 43rd Street,
if extended, and west of the Panther Creek canyon to its east, and north ofS. 47th Street.)
SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and
five days after publication.
PASSEDBYTIIECITYCOUNCILthis 1st day of December ,2003.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY TIIE MAYOR this 1 s t day of_......!OD~e""c~e!!!m.!,!.b-"'-e~r ____ , 2003.
Jesse Ta&r: Mayor
~ Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication: 12/5/2003 (summary)
ORD.l 069: 11l13/03:ma
2
EXHIBIT" A"
ORDINANCE NO. 5046
WSDOT-CARR ROAD 2003 COMP PLAN AMENDMENTS
LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT
PARCEL "A" TO R-IO
2003-M-Ol
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
That portion of the east half (112) of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 31
aud the west half (1/2) of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 32, all iu
Township 23 North, Rauge 5 East, W.M. in the City of Renton, King County, Washington, lying
within the area described as follows:
Beginning at the northwest corner of said east half (1/2) of the southeast quarter of the northeast
quarter of said Section 31;
Thence S 89°00'09" E, along the north line of said east half, a distauce of 516.10 feet;
Thence S 00029'12" W a distauce of 36.56 feet;
Thence S 09"27'57" W a distauce of 16.20 feet;
Thence S 04°45'56" W a distauce of 10.69 feet;
Thence S 55°14'42" E a distauce of 6.50 feet;
Thence S 70001'25" E a distauce of 23.43 feet;
Thence S 60°15'52" E a distauce of 16.14 feet;
Thence S 29°45'14" E a distauce of 8.07 feet;
Thence S 77"28'33" E a distauce of 36.91 feet;
Thence N 81°56'27" E adistauce of 30.93 feet;
Thence S 76°40'49" E a distauce of 31.84 fcet;
Thence N 80008'16" E a distauce of 19.04 feet;
Thence N 64"26'54" E adistauce of 20.79 feet;
Thence N 78°41'39" E a distauce of 16.63 feet;
Thence S 18"26'30" E a distauce of7.73 feet;
Thence S 05°11'45" W a distauce of 9.00 fcet;
Thence S 26°34'27" W a distauce of 16.41 feet;
Thence S 35°50'52" W a distauce of 18.10 feet;
Thence S 45"00'39" W a distauce of 13.84 feet;
Thence S 28°1S'35" W a distauce of 12.04 feet;
Thence S 00"22'41" E a distauce of 19.75 feet;
Thence S 35"00'08" E a distauce of 12.43 feet;
Thence S 14"02'30" E a distauce of 12.59 feet;
Thence South a distauce of 11.20 feet;
Thence S Oso08'OO" W a distauce of7.20 feet;
Thence S 40036'43" E a distance of 9.39 feet;
Thence S 67"23'16" E a distauce of 13.24 feet;
Thence S 56°19'13" E a distauce of 11.01 feet;
Thence S 22"37'37" E a distauce of 13.24 feet;
Thence S 23°12'23" W a distauce of 7.75 feet;
Thence S 15°57'04" E a distauce of 14.82 feet;
Thence S 41°38'40" E a distauce of 12.26 feet;
Thence S 16°10'18" E a distauce of 26.48 feet;
Thence S IS"26'29" W a distance of 30.82 feet;
Thence South a distance of 13.64 feet;
Thence S 14"02'29" E a distance of 16.07 feet;
Thence S 71"34'17" E a distance of 12.33 feet;
Thence N 83°39'44" E a distance of 17.66 feet;
Thence S 63"26'37" E a distance of 17.44 feet;
Thence S 26"34'26" E a distance of 8.72 feet;
Thence South a distance of 13.64 feet;
Thence S 26"34'26" W a distance of 13.08 feet;
Thence S 26"34'26" E a distance of 13.08 feet;
Thence S 61"23'55" E a distance of 24.43 feet;
Thence S 66"02'43" E a distance of 19.20 feet;
Thence S 32"00'54" E a distance of 18.39 feet;
Thence S 26"34'26" E a distance of 26.15 feet;
Thence S 25"02'17" E a distance of 22.82 feet;
Thence S 14°56'13" E a distance of 24.65 feet;
Thence South a distance of 6.35 feet;
Thence S 26"34'25" W a distance of7.l0 feet;
Thence S 63"26'37" W a distance of 7.10 feet;
Thence West a distance of 57.19 feet;
Thence S 82°52'40" W a distance of 38.42 feet;
Thence S 66°48'33" W a distance of 36.29 feet;
Thence S 46°59'08" W a distance of 32.59 feet;
Thence S 30"28'29" W a distance of 31.32 feet;
Thence S 40014'50" W a distance of 27.05 feet;
Thence S 42"31'16" W a distance of 25.86 feet;
Thence S 37"53'08" W a distance of 36.22 feet;
Thence S 28°50'52" W a distance of 52.21 feet;
Thence S 18"26'29" W a distance of 38.46 feet;
Thence S 09"27'57" E a distance of 36.99 feet;
Thence S 11°18'50" E a distance of 31.01 feet;
Thence South a distance of 36.49 feet;
Thence S 06"20'33" E a distance of 27.53 feet;
Thence S 30058'22" W a distance of 17.73 feet;
Thence S 82°52'40" W a distance of 24.52 feet;
Thence S 56°19'11" W a distance of 21.93 feet;
Thence S 18"26'29" W a distance of 19.23 feet;
Thence S 50012'19" W a distance of 23.75 feet;
Thence S 68°12'21" W a distance of 16.38 feet;
Thence S 56°19'12" W a distance of 21.93 feet;
Thence S 53°58'58" W a distance of 41.37 feet;
Thence S 54"28'20" W a distance of 26.16 feet;
Thence S 45"00'39" W a distance of 30.11 feet;
Thence S 84°48'27" W a distance of 33.60 feet;
Thence S 88°40'59" W a distance of 81.52 feet;
Thence N 60015'52" W a distance of 20.33 feet;
Thence N 51"21'02" W a distance of 16.14 feet;
Thence N 84°17'30" W a distance of 25.34 feet;
Thence N 85°14'17" W a distance of 30.36 feet;
Thence N 56°19'12" W a distance of 18.18 feet;
Thence N 35°32'52" Wa distance of 21.69 feet;
Thence N 16°42'19" W a distance of 26.32 feet;
ORDINANCE NO. 5046
,
Thence N 14°02'29" E a distance of 10.39 feet;
Thence N 33°42'()()" E a distance of 9.09 feet;
Thence N 09°27'57" E a distance of 15.33 feet;
Thence N 14°02'29" W a distance of 20.79 feet;
Thence N 18°26'30" W a distance of 15.94 feet;
Thence N 17°44'26" W a distance of 58.74 feet;
Thence N 30"15'57" W a distance of 51.50 feet;
Thence N 63°26'37" W a distance of 37.31 feet;
Thence N 21°48'32" W a distance of 29.95 feet;
Thence N 07°48'52" W a distance of 37.52 feet;
ThenceN 1l018'51"Eadistanceof35.41 feet;
Thence N 08007'59" E a distance of 32.74 feet;
Thence N 27°54'22" W a distance of 44.53 feet;
Thence N 33°42'01" W a distance of 33.39 feet;
Thence N 45"()()'40" E a distance of 13.10 feet;
Thence North a distance of 25.46 feet;
Thence N 28004'53" W a distance of 39.36 fcet;
Thence N 45°()()'39" W a distance of 45.84 feet;
Thence N 21°35'50" W a distance of 59.56 feet;
ORDINANCE NO. 5046
Thence N 01"29'39" E a distance of 80.50 feet, to the west line of said east half;
Thence N 01°07'19" E along said west line, a distance of 336.48 feet, to the Point of Beginning.
Exhibit "8"
R-10
WSDOT -Carr Rd. (2003-M-01)
Site "A" -R-1 to R-10 e Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
... Alex Pimch. Admioistntor ~ G. Del Rosario
19 November 2003
o
I
ORDINANCE NO. 5046
,
S 179th St.
300 600
iiiiiiiiiiiiii !~~~I
1 : 3600
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 5047
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN
PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM RESIDENTIAL
1 DUlAC ZONING TO RESIDENTIAL 5 DUlAC ZONING. FILE NO.
LUA-OI-165, 2003-M-Ol (WSDOT CARR RD -SITE B).
WHEREAS, under Section 4-2-020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts -Uses and Standards,
of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 known as the "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton," as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction . .
therewith, the property hereinbelow described has previously been zoned as Residential I dulac;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Renton initiated a proceeding for change of zone classification
of said property; and
WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation,
study, and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about
Octoberl5th, 2003, and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission,
and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended,
and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having
been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby
rezoned to Residential 5 dulac (R-5), as hereinbelow specified. The Neighborhood and Strategic
1
ORDINANCE NO. 5047
Planning Division is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning
Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit:
See Exhibits" A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set furth
herein. (Property consisting of approximately 8.14 acres located north of S. 47th Street,
and west of the Panther Creek canyon to its east.)
SECTIONll. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and
five days after publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 1st day of December ,2003.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 1st day of_--=:::D""e""c:::,em""b"'e""r=---__ --->, 2003.
Date of Publication: 12/5/2003 ( summary)
ORD.1070:111l3/03:ma
2
,
EXHrBlT "A"
ORDINANCE NO. 5047
WSDOT-CARR ROAD 2003 COMP PLAN AMENDMENTS
LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT
PARCEL "B" TO R-5
2003-M..ol
LEGAL DESCRlPTION:
That portion of the east half (112) of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 31
and that portion of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 32, all in TOwnShip
23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington,lying within the
area described as follows:
Beginning at the E \4 corner of said Section 31 ;
Thence N 01°14'48" E along the east line of said Section 31,adistance of 131.81, to the
northeast corner of the pla~ of Talbot Ridge, as recorded in Volume 194 of Plats, pages 15
through 17, inclusive, records of King County, Washington;
Thence S 89"01 '02" E along the north line of said pIal, a distance of 390.00 feet;
Thence N 54°47'29" E a distance of 15.06 fect;
Thence N 46"24'29" E a distance of 24.02 feet;
Thence N 66°12'07" E a distance of 30.78 feet;
. Thence N 86"25'30" E a distance of26.56 feet;
Thence S 76"30'33" E a distance of 21.29 feet;
Thence S 70"43'01" E a distance of 17.55 feet;
Thence N 72"01'40" E a distance of 26.98 feet;
ThenceN 85"14'17" E a distance of 9.97 feet;
Thence South a distance of 10.76 feet;
Thence 5 10"00'43" W a distance of 14.29 feet;
Thence 5 30"15'57" E a distance of 11.50 feet;
Thence 5 74°45'00" E a distance of 9.44 feet;
Thence N 60"45'37" E a distance of 23.73 feet;
ThenceN 70"36'56" E a distance of 23.24 feet;
Thence 583°59'36" E a distance of 32.99 feet;
Thence 579"07'07" E a distance of 45.72 feet;
Thence 5 84°48'27" E a distance of 38.15 feet;
Thence N 79"07'07" E a distance of 45.72 feet;
Thence N 77"28'33" E a distance of31.84 feet;
Thence N 84°57'34" E a distance of 58.94 feet;
Thence N 77°45'42" E a distance of 12.90 feet;
ThenceN 48"2'2'37" E a distance of 18.44 feet;
Thence North a distance of 12.25 feet;
Thence N 26"34'24" W a distance of 13.70 feet;
Thence N 53008'26" E a distance of 22.97 feet;
Thence N 7T'39'07" E a distance of 25.68 feet;
Thence East a distance of 22.98 feet;
Thence N 56°19'13" E a distance of 16.57 feet;
Thence N 82"14'16" E a distance of34.01 feet;
Thence East, a distance of 19.91 feet;
Thence N 55°18'54" E a distance of 24.22 feet;
Thence N 45"00'39" E a distance of 8.66 feet;
Thence S 71"34'17" E a distance of 19.37 feet;
Thence S 81°52'24" E a distance of 10.83 feet;
Thence North a distance of 30.62 feet;
Thence N 52008'08" W a distance of 17.46 feet;
Thence N 19"59'23" W a distance of 17.92 feet;
Thence N 05°11 '47" E a distance of 16.91 feet;
Thence N 51"21'04" E a distance of9.81 feet;
Thence S 74°45'02" E a distance of 17.46 feet;
Thence S 59"02'45" E a distance of 17.86 feet;
Thence N 31"37'01" E a distance of 23.37 feet;
Thence S 63"26'37" E a distance of 17.12 feet;
Thence S 78°41'39" E a distance of 15.62 feet;
'Thence N 30"55'43" E a distance of 22.61 feet;
Thence North a distance of 43 .73 feet;
Thence N 18"26'29" W a distance of 39.51 feet;
Thence N 03°48'55" E a distapce of 31.30 feet;
Thence N 70"01 '25" E a distance of 24.38 feet;
Thence N 14"02'29" E a distance of 42.93 feet;
Thence N 13"24'35" E a distance of 55.95 feet;
Thence N 02°51'48" E a distance of51.18 feet;
Thence North a distance of 23.00 feet;
Thence S 66°15'30" E a distance of 69.83 feet;
Thence S 61"33'58" E a distance of 69.78 feet;
'Thence S 54°15'23" E a distance of 78.75 feet;
Thence S 64°59'29" E a distance of 42.32 feet;
Thence S 38°10'03" E a distance of 45.51 feet;
Thence S 51°51'12" E a distance of 45.52 feet;
Thence S 50"55'00" E a distance of 52.70 feet;
Thence S 36"52'49" E a distance of 25.56 feet;
Thence S 39"48'59" E a distance of 39.93 feet;
Thence S 26"34'25" E a distance of 51.44 feet;
Thence S 45°13'27" E a distance of 62.31 feet;
Thence S 60"57'16" E a distance of 129.23 feet;
Thence S 72"28'50" E a distance of 62.53 feet;
Thence S 56°19'12" E a distance of 56.57 feet;
Thence S 69"27'04" E a distance of 53.63 feet;
Thence S 73"36'59" E a distance of 55.61 feet;
Thence S 33°42'00" E a distance of 56.56 feet;
Thence S 36°52'48" E a distance of 47.06 feet;
Thence S 50"12'18" E a distance of 24.51 feet;
ORDINANCE NO. 5047
Thence S 55°19'09" E a distance of 24.21 feet, to the south line of said southwest quarter of the
northwest quarter of Section 32;
Thence S 89"30' 15" W along said south line, a distance of 1259.97 feet, to the E 'A comer of said
Section 31 and the Point of Beginuing;
LESS that portion for South 47th Street, as dedicated for public right of way per King County
Rec. No. 20000204001404.
,
,
ORDINANCE NO. 5047
Exhibit "8"
/
~ .
.J R-5
I \ I I
~ 47th ~t I
7/ f-----I I
W
f------CI) f--Q) > 4:
));\ "-f--"'C n r::::
N
0 I~\ ~
r-\
~
I I I I cI \
WSDOT -Carr Rd. (2003-M-01)
Site "8" -R-l to R-5 0 300 600 ~ e &ono";. Dev.lopmen~ N.lghbomnods & Stratoglc Pl~nlng I I I I tit Alex Pietsch, AdminisbloT
G. Del Rosario
19 November 2003 . 1 .3600
,
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 5048
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN
PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM RESIDENTIAL
1 DUlAC ZONING TO RESIDENTIAL 5 DUlAC ZONING. FILE NO.
LUA-Ol-165, 2003-M-Ol (WSDOT CARR RD-SITE C).
WHEREAS, under Section 4-2-020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts -Uses and Standards,
of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 known as the "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton," as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction . .
therewith, the property herein below described has previously been zoned as Residential I dulac;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Renton initiated a proceeding for change of zone classification
of said property; and
WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation,
study, and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about October
15 th , 2002, and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and said
zoning request being in conformity with the City'S Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the
City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been
heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE· CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby
rezoned to Residential 5 dulac (R-5), as hereinbelow specified. The Neighborhood and Strategic
I
ORDINANCE NO. 5048
Planning Division is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning
Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit:
See Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth
herein. (Property consisting of approximately 8.37 acres located to the northeast of the
Panther Creek canyon and south of S. 43 ni Street, if extended, and west of l04tb Avenue
SE.)
SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and
five days after publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 1 st day of December ,2003.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 1 s t day of_--=D..=e..=c..=e=m=.be=.r=--__ -', 2003.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication: 12/5/2003 ( summary)
ORD.l071:11l13/03:ma
2
,
,
EXHIBIT "A"
ORDINANCE NO. 5048
WSDOT-CARR ROAD 2003 COMP PLAN AMENDMENTS
LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT
PARCEL "c" TO R·5
2003-M-Ol
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
That portion of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 32, Township 23 North,
Range 5 East, W.M. in the City of Renton, King County, Washington, lying within the area
described as follows
Beginning at the northeast comer of the west one half (1/2) of said southwest quarter of the
northwest quarter of Section 32;
Thence S 01°16'55" W along the east line of said subdivision, a distance of 200.00 feet;
Thence N 88"08'41" E a distance of 658.83 feet, to the east line of said southwest quarter of the
northwest quarter;
Thence S 01°18'41" W along said east line, a distance of 623.15 feet;
Thence N 57°15'52" W a distance of 17.00 feet;
Thence N 64°59'29" W a distance of 41.45 feet;
Thence N 69°27'04" W a distance of 42.79 feet;
Thence N 67"45'31" W a distance of 59.52 feet;
Thence N 66°22'43" W a distance of 43.73 feet;
Thence N 49"24'34" W a distance of 23.08 feet;
Thence N 52°04'50" W a distance of 77.13 feet;
Thence S 73"36'59" W a distance of 36.15 feet;
Thence N 72°54'12" W a distance of 27.75 feet;
Thence N 30"58'24" E a distance of 47.57 feet;
Thence N 39"17'59" W a distance of 28.99 feet;
Thence N 70"01'26" W a distance of 23.88 feet;
Thence S 68°12'21" W a distance of 21.97 feet;
Thence S 53°58'59" W a distance of 27.74 feet;
Thence N 52"08'07" W a distance of 23.26 feet;
Thence N 67"37'39" W a distance of 37.50 feet;
Thence S 58°00'15" W a distance of 19.24 feet;
Thence West a distance of 24.48 feet;
Thence N 58"24'07" W a distance of 31.14 feet;
Thence N 54"28'21" W a distance of 35.09 feet;
Thence N 51"21'03" Wadistance of26.12 feet;
Thence N 56°19'11 ". W a distance of 29.42 feet;
Thence N 41°11'48" W a distance of 21.68 feet;
Thence N 58"23'52" W a distance of 38.32 feet;
Thence N 57°10'53" W a distance of 55.34 feet;
Thence N 47"30'01" W a distance of 48.83 feet;
Thence N 47°44'14" W a distance of 44.60 feet;
Thence N 36°52'48" W a distance of 30.00 feet;
Thence N 15°15'38" W a distance of 17.10 feet;
Thence N 10°12'52" E a distance of 17.06 feet;
Thence N 24"27'07" E a distance of 22.63 feet;
Thence North a distance of 22.48 feet;
Thence N 38°40'13" W a distance of 11.99 feet;
Thence N 58000'16" W a distance of 17.67 feet;
Thence N 05°42'45" W a distance of 37.65 feet;
Thence N 33°42'01" W a distance of 20.26 feet;
Thence N 20"33'47" W a distance of 16.00 feet;
Thence N 33°42'00" W a distance of 20.26 feet;
Thence N 20039'02" W a distance of 71.39 feet;
Thence N 18°58'37" W a distance of 27.44 feet;
Thence N 23°30'23" Wa distance of 40.68 feet;
Thence N 28°18'36" W a distance of 23.95 feet;
Thence N 26"33'08" W a distance of 17.92 feet;
Thence N 24°41'03" W a distance of 3.64 feet;
ORDINANCE NO. 5048
Thence N 28°43'40" Wa distance of 13.26 feet, to the north line of said southwest quarter of the
northwest quarter;
Thence N 88005'24" E along said north line, a distance of 244.47 feet, to the Point of Beginning.
,
,
Exhibit "8"
S 179th St.
r
~ .d.7th ~t I u
I--
WSDOT -Carr Rd. (2003-M-01)
Site "e" -R·1 to R-S e Economic Development. Neighborhoods & Sbategic Planning
.. Alex Pietsch, Administrator ~ G. Del RotariG
19 November 200J
o
I
ORDINANCE NO. 5048
300 600 ~
liiiiiiiiiiiiiEl ~~~I II
1 .3600
STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING }
AFFIDA VIT OF PUBLICATION
PUBLIC NOTICE
Lily Nguyen, being first duly sworn on oath that she is a Legal Advertising
Representative of the
King County Journal
a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general
circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date
of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language
continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The King
County Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the
Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County.
The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the
King County Iournal (and not in supplement form) which was regularly
distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed
notice, a
Notice of Ordinance No. 5041 through 5048
was published on Friday, 1215/03
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum
of $238.50 at the rate of $15.00 per inch for the first publication and NIA per
inch for eaeli ~ubsequent.i.nsertion.
Lily Nguyen
Legal Advertising Representative, King County Journal
Subscribed and sworn to me this 5th day of December, 2003.
h~~ \111 1 \ \ \ 1111 fI//1
':>.,,\\\ l'oAEAG IIII//.
Tom A. Meagher "" ... " ............ :'>'~ 0 .:::: ~-I' \on E • ~.-o 'l Notary Public for the State of Washington, Resi<!!'ii'~.~on(If,~-i!shllfj;ton
Ad Number: 844831 P.O. Number: . ~:" (j ,,0' AR Y • '; ~
Cost of publishing this notice includes an affida;tit slicharge.. -; z :::
~ <p\ PUB\..\" ':/2 ff
.--/>.', /;;l'\"0~ ~ "1'~··· • ..t,AY 2 '2.~ ••• ,~ ~
~ <$' ........ ~ ••• ~'\. ~
/111 OF Wp..S xx"
1// IXx ///111111\\111\
CITY OF RENTON
NOTICE OF ORDINANCES
ADOPTED BY
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Following is S1lDlIIlll1Y of ordi·
nan .... adopted by the RenJ:on City
Council on December 1. 2003:
ORDINANCE NO. 5041
An ordinance of the City of RenJ:on,
Washington, ann..mg contiguous
unincorporated territory, consisting
of approximately 6.43 acres bounded
by the Olcisting City boundaries to the
north (the southern edge of S. 47th
SI.) and west , the northern edge of
SE 185th Place, if extended, J:o the
BOUth, and the eastern edge of 102nd
Ave SE J:o the e .. t. known as the
Falk. Annexation, by the election
method, and setting the taxation
rate, establishing zoning claaoifi·
cations, and fixing the effective date
of the annexation.
Effective: 1211(JfJOO3
ORDINANCE NO. 5042
An ordinance of the City of RenJ:on,
Washington, establishing the prop-
erty tax levy for the year 2004 for
both general purposes and for voter
approved bond issues. .
Effective: 1211012003
ORDINANCE NO. 5043
An ordinance of the City of Renton,
Washington, amending Sections 8~4-
31 ofChapter-4, Water, and 8-5-15 of
Chapter. 5. Sew .... , of Title VIII
(Health and Sanitation) of Ordinance
No. 4260 entitled ·Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton,
Washington" by increasing f ....
Effective: 01104/2004
ORDINANCE NO. 5044
An ordinance of the CItY of Renton,
Washington, changing the zoning
classification of certain property, con·
sisting of approximately 0.52 acres
located on the 600 block of Rainier
Avenue North, within the City of
Renton from Residential·8 Zoning J:o
Commercial Artarial Zoning. File No.
LUA.Q2·140 (JDA Group LLC). The'
legal description is on file at the City
Clerk's office, and is available upon
request.
EffedOve: 1211012003
ORDINANCE NO. 5045
An ordinance of the City of Renton,:
Washington, changing the zoning'
classification of certain properties;
conSisting of approximately 0.57
acres located on the 500 block of.
Rainier Avenue North, within the
City of Renton from Residential-8:
Zoning J:o Commercial Arterial
Zoning. File No. LUA·02·142 (JDA
Group LLC). The legal descrivtion is-
on file at the City Clerk's office, and.
is available upon request.
EffedOve: 12110t..!003
ORDINANCE NO. 5046
An ordinance of the City of RenJ:on,
Washington, changing the zoning
classification of certain properties,.
consisting of approximately 13.88
acres located south of S. 43rd Street,:
if extended, and west of the Panther
Creek canyon to its east, anr;l north of
S. 47th Street. within the City of
RenJ:on from Residential 1 DUlAC
Zoning J:o Residential 10 DUlAC'
Zoning. File No. LUA·01·165, 2003-
M·Ol (wSDOT Carr Rd -Site A).
The legal description is on file at the
City Clerk's office, and is available.
upon request.
Effective: 1211012003
ORDINANCE NO. 5047
An ordinance of the City of Renton,
Washington, changing the zoning'
classification of certain propertie8~
consisting of approximately 8.14-
acres located north of S. 47th Street,
and west of the Panther Creek can-
yon to its east, within the City of
Renton from Residential 1 DUlAC
Zoning to Residential 5 DUlAC.
Zoning. File No. LUA-01-165, 2003·
M-Ol (WSDOT Carr Rd -Site E).
The legal description is on file at the
City Clerk's office, and is available
upon request.
Effective: 1211012003
ORDINANCE NO. 5048
An ordinance of the City of Renton,
Washington, changing the zoning
classification of certain properties,
consisting of app:roxim.a.tely 8.37
acres located to the northeast of the
Panther Creek canyon and south of S.
43rd Street, if extended, and west of
104th Avenue SE. within the City of
RenJ:on from Residential 1 DUlAC
Zoning J:o Residential 5 DUlAC
Zoning. File No. LUA·Ol·165, 2003-
M·Ol (WSDOT Carr Rd -Site C).
The legal description is on file at the
City Clerk's office, and is available
upon request.
Effective: 1211012003
Complete text of these ordinances
is available at Renton City Hall. 1055
South Grady Way; and posted at the
Renton Public Libraries, 100 Mill,
Avenue South and 2902 NE 12th
Street. Upon' request to the City
Clerk's office, (425) 430·6510, copie.,
will also be mailed for a fee.
Bonnie I. Walton
City ClerklCabie Manager
Published in the King County
Journal December 5, 2003. #844831
61 -
1(,("
December 1, 2003
Ordinance #5044
Rezone: IDA Group Property,
Rainier Ave N, R-8 to CA (R-
02-140)
Ordinance #5045
Rezone: IDA Group Property,
Rainier Ave N, R-8 to CA (R-
02-142)
Ordinance #5046
Rezone: WSDOT Carr Rd Site
A, R-l to R-IO (R-Ol-165)
Ordinance #5047
Rezone: WSDOT Carr Rd Site
B, R-l to R-5 (R-Ol-165)
Ordinance #5048
Rezone: WSDOT Carr Rd Site
C, R-l to R-5 (R-Ol-165)
NEW BUSINESS
Council: 2004 Council
President Election (Persson)
Council: 2004 Council
President Pro Tern (Briere)
Renton City Council Minutes Page 446
COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ, ROLL CALL: FOUR
AYES: KEOLKER-WHEELER, CLAWSON, NELSON, BRIERE; THREE
NAYS: CORMAN, PERSSON, PARKER. CARRIED.
An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property
consisting of 0.52 acres located on the 600 block of Rainier Ave. N. from
Residential -eight dwelling units per acre (R-8) to Commercial Arterial (CA)
zoning; R-02-140 (IDA Group LLC). MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY
CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL
CALL: ALL A YES. CARRIED.
An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property
consisting of 0.57 acres located on the 500 block of Rainier Ave. N. from
Residential -eight dwelling units per acre (R-8) to Commercial Arterial (CA)
zoning; R-02-l42 (IDA Group LLC). MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY
CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL
CALL: ALL A YES. CARRIED.
An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property
consisting of 13.88 acres located south of S. 43rd St., if extended, and west of
Panther Creek canyon to its east, and north of S. 47th SI. from Residential -one
dwelling unit per acre (R-I) to Residential -ten dwelling units per acre (R-lO)
zoning; R-OI-165 (WSDOT Carr Rd. Site A). MOVED BY BRIERE,
SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS
READ. ROLLCALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property
consisting of 8. J 4 acres located north of S. 47th St. and west of Panther Creek
canyon to its east from Residential-one dwelling unit per acre (R-I) to
Residential -five dwelling units per acre (R-5) zoning; R-01-165 (WSDOT
Carr Rd. Site B). MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,
COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL
AYES. CARRIED.
An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property
consisting of 8.37 acres located to the northeast of the Panther Creek canyon
and south of S. 43rd St., if extended, and west of l04th Ave. SE from
Residential-one dwelling unit per acre (R-l) to Residential-five dwelling
units per acre (R-5) zoning; R-Ol-165 (WSDOT Carr Rd. Site C). MOVED BY
BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE
ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED:
Council President Keolker-Wheeler opened nominations for 2004 Council
President.
MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN,
COUNCIL ELECT COUNCILMAN PERSSON AS COUNCIL PRESIDENT
FOR 2004. CARRIED.
Council President Keolker-Wheeler opened nominations for 2004 Council
President Pro Tern.
MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,
COUNCIL ELECT COUNCILWOMAN BRIERE AS COUNCIL PRESIDENT
PRO TEM FOR 2004. CARRIED.
November 24, 2003
Rezone: JDA Group Property,
Rainier Ave N, R-8 to CA (R-
02-142)
Rezone: WSDOT Carr Rd Site
A, R-l to R-lO (R-01-165)
Rezone: WSDOT Carr Rd Site
B, R-I to R-5 (R-OI-165)
Rezone: WSDOT Carr Rd Site
C, R-I to R-5 (R-01-165)
Ordinance #5040
Utility: Utility System
Development Charges
Resolution #3666
Comprehensive Plan: Dalpay
Development Agreement
Renton City Council Minutes Page 436
An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property
consisting of 0.57 acres located on the SOO block of Rainier Ave. N. from
Residential -eight dwelling units per acre (R-S) to Commercial Arterial (CA)
zoning; R-02-142 (JDA Group LLC). MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY
CLAWSON, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND
FINAL READING ON 1210112003. CARRIED.
An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property
consisting of 13.88 acres located south of S. 43rd SI., if extended, and west of
Panther Creek canyon to its east, and north of S. 47th SI. from Residential -one
dwelling unit per acre (R-I) to Residential -ten dwelling units per acre (R-IO)
zoning; R-D 1-165 (WSDOT Carr Rd. Site A). MOVED BY BRIERE,
SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR
SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/01/2003. CARRIED.
An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property
consisting of 8.14 acres located north of S. 47th St. and west of Panther Creek
canyon to its east from Residential-one dwelling unit per acre (R-l) to
Residential -five dwelling units per acre (R-5) zoning; R-01-165 (WSDOT
Carr Rd. Site B). MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,
COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL
READING ON 12/0112003. CARRIED.
An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property
consisting of 8.37 acres located to the northeast of the Panther Creek canyon
and south of S. 43rd St., if extended, and west of l04th Ave. SE from
Residential -one dwelling unit per acre (R-I) to Residential-five dwelling
units per acre (R-5) zoning; R-Ol-165 (WSDOT Carr Rd. Site C). MOVED BY
BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL REFER THE
ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 1210112003.
CARRIED.
The following ordinance was presented for second and final reading and
adoption:
An ordinance was read amending subsections 4-1-ISO.1.2.b and 4-1-1S0.1.2.c of
Section 4-1-180, Public Works Fees, of Chapter 1, Administration and
Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of City Code by
increasing water, wastewater, and surface water fees (Utility System
Development Charges). MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,
COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: SIX
AYES: KEOLKER-WHEELER, BRIERE, PERSSON, CORMAN, NELSON,
CLAWSON; ONE NAY: PARKER. CARRIED.
The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption:
A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a
development agreement between the City of Renton and Dalpay Properties
LLC, A Washington Limited Liability Company, Louis B. Woodcock,
Godofredo and Avelina Blanco, and Edwin Goebel (owner). MOVED BY
BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE
RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
November 24, 2003
Planning & Development
Committee
Comprehensive Plan: 2003
Amendments / \'<JV)
~()\(
• • Renton City Council Minutes Page 428
8. Amend existing urban center design overlay standards and guidelines to
establish a new District C, encompassing the Urban Center-North. Provide
guidance to accomplish quality urban scale development, define pedestrian
streets, and achieve gateway entry features into the redevelopment area. *
Responding to Council President Keolker-Wheeler's inquiry, City Attorney
Larry Warren confirmed that the recent Planning Commission
recommendations were included in the related ordinances.
*MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY PARKER,
COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See
pages 432 to 435 for ordinances.)
Planning and Development Comminee Chair Briere presented a report
regarding the 2003 Comprehensive Plan amendments and rezones. The
Committee met on October 30, November 6, and November l3, 2003, to
consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the 2003
Comprehensive Plan amendments and rezones. The Committee recommended
approval of the Planning Commission's recommendations with modifications,
as appropriate, as shown on the matrix entitled "Attachment A -2003
Comprehensive Plan Amendments" dated November 24, 2003, listed as
follows:
• 2003-M-I -City of Renton applicant; S. Talbot Rd. and S. 43rd St
(WSDOT)
• 2003-M-2 -City of Renton applicant; King County Public Health
Department; NE 4th SI. (on hold until 2004 amendment cycle)
• 2003-M-3 -City of Renton applicant; 1-405lCedar River Trail (WSDOT);
on hold until 2004 amendment cycle
• 2003-M-4 -City of Remon applicant; East Renton Plateau
• 2003-M-5 -City of Renton applicant; Fry's Electronics
• 2003-M-6 -City of Renton applicant (withdrawn)
• 2003-M-7 -City of Renton applicant (holdover -2004 update)
• 2OO3-M-8 -City of Renton applicant; SR 900 LLC (Merlino)
• 2003-M-9 -JDA Group LLC applicant; Rainier Ave. N.
• 2003-M-1O -JDA Group LLC applicant; NW 5th St.
• 2003-M-ll -JDA Group LLC applicant (on hold until 2004 amendment
cycle)
• 2003-M-12 -James Dalpay applicant; NE 12th St
• 2003-M-14 -Liberty Ridge LLC (Tydico)
• 2003-T-3 -The Boeing Company applicant (on hold until 2004 amendment
cycle)
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR
IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See pages 432, 435 & 436 for
ordinances. )
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
November 24,2003
2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Rezones
(November 4, 2002)
ArZ"[;OVCD BY 1
CZill COUNCIL
Date //-~t/-~003'
The Planning & Development Committee met on October 30th, November 6th , and November
13 th to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation for the City's 2003
Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezones. The Planning Commission recommendations
are outlined on the attached matrix.
The Committee recommends approval of the Planning Commission recommendation with
modifications, as appropriate, shown on the attached ma,trix.
~. A ~. )..erri BrierecIlaif
cc: Alex Pietsch, EDNSP Administrator
Gregg Zimmerman, P/B/PW Administrator
Neil Watts, Development Services Director
Rebecca Lind, Planning Manager
Jennifer Henning, Principal Planner
I:\COMMITIE\Reports\Planning & Deve1opment\2003\2003 CPA.rpt.doc
Rev 01102 bh
_2003-M-1 City of Request to change Land Support re-designation of this site to a more Concur with staff recommendation for 5 residents of the Sundance Concur with Planning
LUA-01-165 Renton· Use Designatlons from intensive land use since the site's prior use development near the subject Commission
(DE) South Talbot Residential Rural to for gravel excavation has been discontinued Area A, C and D. property spoke in favor of recommendations.
Rd & S. 43" Residential Single Family, and the property has multiple areas that are For Are. B, retain the RR keeping lower density on Area
St. Residential Planned B.
(WSDOT) Nelghhorhood or Residential adequate for redevelopment. Specifically, designatioD while changing the R-I
Options, and Employment staff is recommending the following: zoning for this 8.14-acre portion along No comments were received
Area Office. •• ~. Change the RR designation South 47" Street to concurrent R-5 ahout Areas A, C. and D.
and R-l zoning in the northwest zoning;
corner of the site to RO with
concurrent R-IO zoning. rather than
Commercial Office (CO) as requested
by the applicant.
b. ~ Change the RR designation
and R-l zoning in tbe southern
portion of the site to RS with
concurrent R-8 zoning; consistent
Viith the applicant's request for this
area;
c. Area C. Retain the RR designation in
the northeast comer of the site but
change the implementing zoning from
R-I to R-5, rather thanR-1O as
requested by the applicant, and
Area D .. Retain the RR designation with R-
1 zoning over those portions of the site that
are most environmentally sensitive (steep
slopes, Panther Creek, etc.); also consistent
with the applicant's request.
-._-
-1-11124103
#2003-M-2 City of Review the designation from On hold until 2004 cycle
LUA.o1·167 Renton· Center InstlMian to
(DE) K.C. Public Employment Area-
Health Dept. Commercial to rezone from
-NE4th Light Indusb1a1 to
Commercial Arterial
#2003·M-:l City of A technical correction to land On hold until 2004 cycle
LUA.o1·166 Renton-use map rectlfyIng the
(DE) 1-405/-Cedar designation of a remnant
River Trail parcel from Center Office
(WSDOT) Residential to Rural
Residential.
#2003-M-4 City of Review how this area fits 1. Support changing the name of the Concur with staff recommendatfon with no 13 residents of the area Concur with Planning
LUA.o1·168 Renton-within the Comprahensive . Residential Rural (RR) land use changes spoke.12 supported the steff Commission
(DE) East Renton Plan Vision, and whether the designation to Residential Low Density recommendation of R-4 base recommendations
Plateau Land Use & Housing (RLD). noting that few areas having this zoning but did not support the
Elements are better designation are rural In character; interlm study recommendation
Implemented by the 2. Support redesignation of the City's of allowing a bonus to 6 du per
Residential Rural (RC. R·1. 2,71JO.acre East Renton Plateau acre on a portion of the study
R-5) or Residential Single Potential Annexation Area so that a ares. Generally residents
Family (R-5 & R-8). majority of the area culTElnUy deSignated were concemed about quality
RS with concurrent R-8 zoning at the of development Issues.
time of annexatfon is changed to RLD Concems were expressed
with concurrent R-4 zoning (see about drainage flooding, traffic
attached figure); annexation, and future pari<
3. Retain the current RS land use development. Slower and a
designation with concurrent R-B zoning greater degree of planned I
at the time of annexation In the areas growth wes generally I outside of the City wast of 144~ Avenue supporiad.
SE; One citizen spoke who was
Support new land use policies that create a located out of the current study
new Residential 4 du/net acre Ove~ay area.
District within the RLD land use designation Generally R-4 zoning without
that will be applied in the East Renton a bonus was supported.
Plateau PM as shown on the attached Cmzens stated that they
exhibit. ----------
·2· 11124/03
#2003-M-4 City of Review how this area fits 4. Suppert new land use policies that Concur with staff recommendation with no appreciated the City holding ConCllr with Planning
LUA-01·168 Renton-within the Comprehensive encourage new development within the changes meetings in their area and Commission
(DE) East Renton Plan Vision, and whether the Residential4-dulnet acre OVerlay listening to their concerns. recommendations
Plateau Land Use & Housing District to develop as higher quality
Elements are better residential developments through the
Implemented by the use of revised development standards
Residential Rural (RC, R·1. that encourage innovative site planning,
R-5) or Residential Single the use of durable exterior materials,
Family (R-5 & R-8). the modulation of building masses, the
provision of quality landscaping, and
similar attributes that help ensure
attractive and healthy neighborhoods;
5, Support revised development standards
for the R-4 Ovenay Olstnct that Increase
the minimum lot size, provide for more
flexible lot widths, and Increase the
minimum front, side, and rear yard
requirements over those provided for in
the R-5 zone; and,
6. Support new policies grandfathering in
parcels that were granted sewer
availability certificates prior to October
22.2003.
#2003·M-5 City of Amend the Comprehensive Approval of the re-cleslgnation to Urban Concur with staff recommendation with no None Concur with Planning
Renton Plan Map for 21.37 aaas Center North with a concurrent rezone to changes Commission
LUA-03·10D from Employment Area -UCN·1. similar to the re-cleslgnatlon and recommendations
Fry's TransHion (EA·T) to Urban rezone occuning west of Garden Avenue
Property Center North (UC·N) and North. The existing designation,
concurrent rezone from Employment Area Transition. is being
Center Office Residential 3 deleted as part of the Boeing CPA and
(COR3) to Urban Center rezone,
North -District 1 (tJ~c:N,J) . ~. --
·3· 11124/03
#2003-M~ City of Amend Comprehensive Plan Withdrawn
(DE) Renton Map to adjust parcel
boundary between Uberty
LUA-01-163 RIdge and Aegis Proparties
RPrf(R-10) to EA-I (IL).
#2003-M-7 City of Review Rural Residential Holdover 2004 Update
(Ge) Renton deslgnaUons to evaluate,
which properties are
appropriate for R·5 zoning
and make appropriate map -
amendments.
#2003-M~ City of Menlno Map Amendment-Support r<KIeslgnating the subject 26-acre Reodeslgnate the site Residential 2 residents. and 3 Concur with Planni -(DE) Renton Request to amend Land Use site from RM~ to RS with concurrent R-8 Options with R-10 zoning rathor than representatives of groups Commission
(SR 900) Designation from Residential zoning subject to a development Single Family with R-8 zoning to reduce spoke. Fnend of Green River, recommendations
LUA-01-164 Murtffamily Infill to agreement between the City and the amount of grading necessary to Herons Forever, and the South
ResldenUal Opllons and oxlsUnglfuture property owners limiting the construct housing development. King County Sierra Club were
amend the existing maximum number of units to 69 single represented. The
Development Agreement to family detschad unUs, requiring the Concur with staff recommendation on the environmental groups
reduce density on the site. construction of a barrier fence at least 6-feet amendments to the development supported the down-zone and
high the full length of the development, and agreement. the continuing enforcement of
prohibiting the slUng of residential andlor the development agreement.
recreaUonal uses within 100-feet olthe The suggestion was made that
site's southern property line; the required fence be Installad
so that access is cut off to the
railroad track.
One resident supportad tree
removal on the site to improve
the quality of the view from his
proparty across Sunset Blvd.
-4-11124/03
•
#2003-M-9 JDA Group Request to amend Compre-• Conditional approval of the requested Concur with staff recommendation No Comments Concur with Staff
(Ge) 1st hensille Plan to redesignate redeslgnatlon from Residential Single based upon the following Recommendation:
Cammer-0.52 ac. from Residential Family (RSF) to Employment Area conditions being met prior to
LUA-02-140 clal Single Family to Employment Commercial (EAC) with a concurrent redeslgnation and rezone: Conditional approval of
Rainier Ave. Area Commercial rezone from Residential-8 (R-8) to the requested
N. Commercial Arterial (CA) provided thaI: redesignatlon from
(a) A tot consclldation Is completad with 1. A lot consolidation occur to Residential Single
the commercially-zoned parcel to between this parcel of property Family (RSF) to
the south prior to any commercial and the CA-zoned parcel to the Employment Area
.... (Including 81gn Installation) south also owned by JDA Commercial (EAC) ,
occurring on the site; and Group, LLC; a concurrent rezol
from Residentlal-8 ,_ .-
A native growth protection easement be 2. A Native Growth Protection 8) to Commercial
recorded on the portion of the site covered Easement be recorded on the Artertal (CA) provided
by steep slopes prior to any commercial slopes of 40% or greater on that:
use (Including sign Installation) this parcel of property. A Jot consolidation is occurring on the site.
completed with the
commercially-zoned
parcel to the south
prior to any
commercial u ••
(Including 81gn
Installation) occurring
on the site; and
A native growth
protection easement be
recorded on the-portion
of the site covered by
steep slopes prior to
any commercial u ' -
(including 81gn
installation) occurring
on the sl~e. ---
-5-11124103
#2003-M·10 JDAGroup Request to amend Campre-Approve the redeslgnatlon of this 0.57 acre Concur with staff recommendation No Comments Concur with Planning ,
(Ge) 2nd hensiva Plan to redesignate vacant parcel of property from Residential Commission
Commercial 0.57 ac from Residential Single Family (RSF) to Employment Area recommendations
LUA·92·142 NW5·Sl Singia Family to Employment Commercial (EAC) with concurrent rezone
Area Commercial to from R-8 to CA zone.
#2003-M·11 JDAGroup Request to amend Compre-On hold until 2004 cycle
(GC Townhome henslve PI.n to re-deslgnats
(NW 87'" 6.89 ao. (4 parcels) from '.
LUA-92·143 IRalnlerl Residential Rural &
NW5" st. Residential Single Family to
Residential 14. .
---_.-
-6. 11124/03
#2003-M·12 James Request to amend Com pre-Oonlal of tho application changing tho Conditionally approve the redesignatlon 4 residents and the property Concur with Planning
(GC) Dalpay hensive Plan to re~es_ignate land use designation from Residential of 2.48 acres of property from owner addressed the Commission
(NE 12" St.) Residential Single Family to Singlo Family (RSF) to Center R.sldentlal Singlo Family (RSF) to Commission. All speakers recommendation
LUA'()2·139 Center Neighborhood (3.48 Neighborhood (CN) wHh denial ofthe Contor Nolghborhood (CN) with opposed the staff except for residential
acres) concurrent rezone from R-8 to eN. concurrent rezone from R-8 to eN zone. recommendation. Residents area abutting NE 12th
Retain an araa ap~roxlmately 126 f8.t In opposed eN commercial Streot, Modify proposal
Approval of City .taff recommondation to dopth from NE 12 Street a. RSF with zoning along NE 12" and to permit redesignatlon
chango the land uso designation from Rw8 zoning, to pennlt residential supported R-8 zoning rather to Residential Options
RSF to Residential Options (RO) wHh a development buffering NE 12th Street than R·l0, The property wilh concurrent R·l0
concurrent rezone from R..a to R .. 10. from the commercial development to owner was willing to support a zoning for area
This re-de.lgnatlon will provide 'a the north. Condition this recommended split zoning on the site with a approximately 126
transition between the more commercial action on: portion re-zoned to eN and a in depth from NE 12
area fronting on Sunset Boulevard, and 1. Completion of lot line portion to R~10. Concern was Street.
the .Ingl .... famlly residential area south adjustments and/or platting that expressed by residents about
the adequacy of a buffor of NE 12" Street. divides the properties In between residential and
question according to the above commercial uses, the number
mentioned Comprehensive Plan of single family homes that
and zoning designation line to could be built on the proposed
prevent split-zoning parcels of R-10 portion of the site, and
land. the lot size and width. Citizens
2, Execution of a development expressed opposition to
agreement that prevents commercial traffic entering N E
commercial uses and their 12" St.
customers on Dalpay Properties
land from accessing their
buildings from NE 12"' Street,
3. Execution of a development
agreement that requires residential
development along the N E 1211'1
Street properties to be accessed
via an alley with a maximum of two
accoss DOlnts on NE 12" Street.
·7· 11124/03
#2003·M·12 James Request to amend Compl"&--4. Execution of a development
(GC) Oalpay henslYe Plan to re-deslgnate agreement that requires a 15·
(NE 12~ St.) Residential Single Family to foot slght-obscurlng landscape
LUA-02·139 Center Neighborhood (3.48 buffer along the CN property
acres) lin ... abutting Roll and R·l0
zoned properties.
1112003·M·14 Tydico Request to change the map Support ~esignating the subject 9.46-Concur with staff recommendation with no A representative of the Concur with Planning
(DE) designation from Residential acre site from RS to RO with concurrent R· changes property owner spoke in favor Commission
Single Family (RS) to 10 zoning subject to a development of the staff recommendation. recommendations
LUA-02·144 Residential Options (RO) agreement between the City and
with a concurrent rezone to existinglfuture proparty owners limiting the
R·l0. 10 units per net acre maximum dsnslty to 10 units per net acre
(9.48-acre site) and requiring lots abutting the southem
property line to have minimum 50-f0ot
widths, the same as those In the R-8 zone
#2003·T·2 Reserved
#2003-T-3 The Booing Review Employment Area-On hold until 2004 eyee
(EH) Company Valley policies relating to
residential use In Valley.
·8· 11124103
I HOllY \;iraoer -U-U,l-U;j.O.OC .
December 1, 2003
Ordinance #5043
Utility: Rates
Ordinance #5044
Rezone: IDA Group Property,
Rainier Ave N, R-S to CA (R-
02-140)
Ordinance #S045
Rezone: IDA Group Property,
Rainier Ave N. R-8 to CA (R-
02-142)
Ordjnaru:e #;;046
Rezone: WSDOT Carr Rd Site
A. R-I to R-IO(R'{)I-I65)
L-LlA 0 ~ -}~5
Ordinance #;;047
Rezone: WSDOT Carr Rd Site
B, R-I to R-S (R'{)I-I65)
Ordinance #5048
Rezone: WSDOT Carr Rd Site
C, R-I toR-S (R.{)1-16S)
NEW BUSINESS
Council: 2004 Council
President Election (Persson)
L-u..ko I ~ ti;;jf'!:::_-:..i
-.. -.. ~!
Renton City Council Minutes
An ordinance was read amending Sections 8-4-31 of Chapter 4, Water. and 8·5-
IS of Chapter 5. Sewers. of Title VIII (Health and Sanitation) of City Code by
increasing utility fees. MOVED BY BRIERE. SECONDED BY CLAWSON.
COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: FOUR
AYES: KEOLKER-WHEELER, CLAWSON, NELSON, BRIERE; THREE
NAYS: CORMAN. PERSSON, PARKER. CARRIED.
An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property
consisting of 0.52 acres located on the 600 block of Rainier Ave. N. from
Residential -eight dwelling units per acre (R-S) to Commercial Arterial (CA)
zoning; R-02-140 (JDA Group LLC). MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY
CLAWSON. COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL
CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property
consisting of 0.57 acres located on the 500 block of Rainier Ave. N. from
Residential -eIght dwelling units per acre (R-S) to Commercial Arterial (CA)
zoning; R-02-142 (JDA Group LLC). MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY
CLAWSON. COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL
CALL: ALL A YES. CARRIED.
An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property
consisting of J 3.88 acres located south of S. 43rd SI., if extended. and west of
Panther Creek canyon to its east, and north of S. 47th St. from Residential -one
dwelling unit per acre (R-l) to Residential -ten dwelling units per acre (R-10)
zoning; R-Ol-J65 (WSDOT Carr Rd. Site A). MOVED BY BRIERE,
SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS
READ. ROLL CALL: ALL A YES. CARRIED.
An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of properly
consiSting of S.14 acres located north of S. 47th SI. and west of Panther Creek
canyon to its east from Residential-one dwelling unit per acre (R-!) to
Residential-fIve dwelling units per acre (R-5) zoning; R'{)I-165 (WSDOT
Carr Rd. Site B). MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,
COUNCil. ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL
AYES. CARRIED.
An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property
consisting of 8.37 acres located to the northeast of the Panther Creek canyon
and south of S. 43rd St, if extended. and west of 104th Ave. SE from
Residential -one dwelling unit per acre (R-l) to Residential-five dwelling
units per acre (R-S) zoning; R-OI-I65 (WSDOT Carr Rd. Site C). MOVED BY
BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE
ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL; ALL AYES. CARRIED.
Council President Keolker-Wheeler opened nominations for 2004 CounCIl
President,
MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN,
COUNCIL ELECT COUNCILMAN PERSSON AS COUNCIL PRESIDENT
FOR 2004. CARRIED.
,
I Holly Graber -i1-24-03.doC
~N~ov~e~m~b~er~24~.2~O~O~3 __________________ ~R~en~w~n~C~i~ry~C~o~un~c~i1~M~I~'n=m=e,~ ___________________ PageIS
Budget: 2004 Property Tax
Levy
Utility: Rates
Rezone: IDA Group Property,
Rainier Ave N, R-8 to CA (R-
02-140)
Rezone: JDA Group Property,
Rainier Ave N, R-8 to CA (R-
02-142)
Rezone: WSDOT Carr Rd Site
A, R-I to R-lO (RoOl-165)
LUA 01 -\(.5
Rezone: WSDOT Carr Rd Site
B, R-I to R-5 (R-0l-165)
Rezone: WSDOT Carr Rd Site
C, R-l to R-5 (R-OI-I65)
An ordinance was read establishing the property tax levy for the year 2004 for
both general purposes and for voter approved bond issues. MOVED BY
PARKER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL REFER THE
ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/0112003.
CARRIED
An ordinance was read amending Sections 84-31 of Chapter 4, Water, and 8-5-
15 of Chapter 5, Sewers, of Title vm (Health and Sanitation) of City Code by
increasing utility fees. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON.
COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL
READING ON 12/0112003. CARRIED.
An ordinance was read changing the zoning classifIcation of property
consisting of 0.52 acres located on the 600 block of Rainier Ave. N. tram
Residential -eight dwelling units per acre (R-8) to Commercial Arterial (CA)
zoning; R-02-140 (JDA Group LLC). MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY
CLAWSON. COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND
FINAL READING ON 1210112003. CARRIED.
An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property
consisting of 0.57 acres located on the 500 block of Rainier Ave. N. from
Residential -eight dwelling units per acre (R-8) to Commercial Arterial (CA)
zoning; R-02-142 (JDA Group LLC). MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY
CLAWSON, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND
FlNAL READING ON 1210112003. CARRIED.
An ordInance was read changing the zoning classification of property
co~sisting of 13.88 acres located south of S. 43rd St., if extended, and west of
Panther Creek canyon to its east, and north of S. 47th SI. from Residential -one
dwelling unit per acre (R-I) to Residential -ten dwelling units per acre (R-IO)
zoning; R-OI-165 (WSDOT Carr Rd. Site A). MOVED BY BRIERE,
SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR
SECOND AND FINAL READING ON IY9112003. CARRIED.
An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property
consisting of 8.14 acres located north of S. 47th SI. and west of Panther Creek
canyon to its east from Residential -one dwelling unit per acre (R-I) to
Residential -five dwelling units per acre (R-5) zoning; R-01-165 (WSDOT
Carr Rd. Site B). MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,
COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FlNAL
REAPIt,Q ON 1210112003, CARRIED.
An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property
consisting of 8.37 acres located to the northeast of the Panther Creek canyon
and south of S. 43rd St., if extended, and west of l04th Ave. SE from
Residential -one dwelling unit per acre (R-I) to Residential -five dwelling
units per acre (R-5) zoning; R-0l-l65 (WSDOT Carr Rd. Site C). MOVED BY
BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL REFER THE
ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 1210112003.
CARRIED.
The following ordinance was presented for second and final reading and
adoption:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING }
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
PUBLIC NOTICE
Lily Nguyen, being first duly sworn on oath that she is a Legal Advertising
Representative of the
King County Journal
a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general
circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date
of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language
continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The King
County Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the
Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County.
The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the
King County Journal (and not in supplement form) which was regularly
distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed
notice, a
Notice of Environmental Determination
was published on Monday, 9/29/03
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum
of $99.75 at the rate of $15.00 per inch for the first publication and N/A per
inch_~0on.
Lily Nguyenl
Legal Advertising Representative, King County Journal
Subscribed and sworn to me this 10th day of November, 2003. \\\\\\\\111"""'1111;, ~ ,,\ (3.1'1 E R ~~" ~ ~ ........ ~ ~ .:S' ~'<,. •• --<. •• """"" 1.-: ~ ... ' ~ •• <-.. l 'O~ .::: . .: ..... o~' \'f""~
Tom A. Meagher ~ "';'; .... 'r' / u \ C:l §
Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Redmo!d:M'o ~hl:oot'" _~ :;; ~ ::
-.. 0 '~6r~1o-o:..:z: ....
Ad Number: 844239 P.O. Number: ~ .... '., ~~.,,':1 <0 §
Cost of publishing this notice includes an affidavit surcharge. ~ "-.. "'t;'! ••• ~T' ~ ~ S·· .. ·····~ :$' :1'//0"" lATE 0.\\\\" '. / .
NOTICIWF ENVIROmQ:NTAL
DETERMINATlQIf,
ENVIRoNMENTAL 1iEvlEw
COMMITrEE
" ,RENTON, W~GTON T1i. ' Environmental Review
Cotninittee bas issued a
Determination of Non.8ignlfira_
fur the foUowing pndect uruIer the
authority of the Renton MUDjoipal
Code. ,
WSDOT CARR ROAD, CPA #2003-
M-l
INA-Ol-l65,CPA,JIJ!:C,F
Propo,ed non-project action Comp Plan AmendmentlRezone to .change
th. lend use designations shown on
the ~'Uas Map fur this, 55-acre
sito ftI>rri Raoidential ~ (RR) with
R·t zoning to a -combination of RR,
Residential Options (ROl, and
Residential Single Family (RS), with
concurrent zoning to R~5, R-B and R-
IO. Location: The site is located
south of Carr Road/S 179th Street
and east of Talbot Road South. It
abuts S. 47th Street on the aouth and
uninCOl'p011lted King Connq. on to.
the aouth and east,
A PobIieu_.-'--will be beld b
the Renton ~ CommissiOn &
the Co1lncil Cbambem, City Holl, on
October 15, 2003 at 6:00 PM to con-
sider the propoeed Compzsbeuive
PIon AJll4Dd m ents ., ~ fur this
~ . of ~'OIlmo;""';'w
lletem>inatiOli,mu&t be filed in writ-
lug oil f1t be(we 5:00PM on October
13',~. Appeala ~ be filed in
'/Iritingtogether With !h& required
$75.oQ applicatilmlofoWilh: Hesring
Examjner, .City -Of-.: a..n,. ,·1055
South Grady W~~ WA 98055.
Appeal. to~_!t!<lt.aie gov-
erned by City ot~ Municipal
Code Section 4-8iJ.4l!." Additional
inIbrmation ~,the appeal
_lnay W obWued 'fnIui the Rs!lton Cjty C/et'k'.{)I\\ee, (425) 430-
6510. . .
~Date:.8Bp\eDiber29, 2003
PubHshed,Jn tbeKing County
JonrnaI ~ber29, 2003. #844239
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
RENTON, WASHINGTON
The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following
project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code.
WSDOT CARR ROAD, CPA #2003-M-l
LUA-01-165,CPA,R,ECF
Proposed non-project action Comp Plan AmendmenURezone to change the land use designations shown
on the Land Use Map for this 55-acre site from Residential Rural (RR) with R-l zoning to a combination of
RR, Residential Options (RO), and Residential Single Family (RS), with concurrent zoning to R-5, R-8 and
R-l0. Location: The site is located south of Carr Road/S 179" Street and east of Talbot Road South. It
abuts S. 47'h Street on the south and unincorporated King County on to the south and east.
A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Planning Commission in the Council Chambers, City Hall, on
October 15, 2003 at 6:00 PM to consider the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments & Rezones for
this site.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on October 13,
2003. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing
Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are
governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional Information regarding the appeal
process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510.
Publication Date: September 29, 2003
Account No. 51067
dn,pub
4711 Smithers Ave S
Renton W A 98055
13-0ct-2003
Don Erickson, Project Manager
Strategic Planning Division
EDNSP Department
1055 South Grady Way
Renton W A 98055
RE: LUA-01-165, CPA, R, ECF; WSDOT CalT Road CPA #2003-M-I
Dear Mr Erickson:
Please allow me to voice my concerns about the proposed rezone of the WSDOT Carr Road
property, which the Washington State Department of Transportation plans to surplus and sell. As
a resident of Sundance, which borders the property under review, my concerns are many: first,
negative impact to traffic levels, second, negative impact to infrastructure, life and safety,
thirdly, negative impact to property values, and lastly, preservation of wildlife and environment.
These concerns are shared by my neighbors, also residents of Sundance, many of whom I have
discussed at length.
Our development is a unique community: small, isolated, and upscale, and the residents tend to
like it that way. These are many ofthe reasons I chose to buy in this area. The proposed rezone
of plat 'B' from R-I to R-8 will dramatically change the character of this community and the
surrounding area. First, the proposal to rezone to R-8 has the potential to triple the amount of
traffic around 102 nd
, Smithers, and 47th Although a recent study showed the effects to traffic
would be negligible, I woudn't be surprised ifit didn't take into account the property to the south
of Sundance, which Schneider currently owns, and it certainly wouldn't have taken into account
the recent annexation and rezone to the immediate east of Sundance (the Falk annexation). When
Schneider and other interested parties subdivide and develop these other plats, which is already
zoned at R-8, tratlic will easily double or triple the current level through these streets. The net
effect of developing all plats is a quadrupling of existing tratlic levels, if not more. This tratlic
situation becomes even worse if a developer has ideas of extending 102 nd all the way to Carr
Road.
A second issue to plat 'B' is the additional infrastructure, and life and safety issues. The biggest
concern is that we are effectively an island with respect to the rest of the city of Renton. What I
mean by that is in order to travel to our area from downtown, one has to leave the Renton City
Limits. This has implications to police and fire, not to mention other services that the Utilities
Department provide. It is this 'island' geography that required Specialized Homes to install fire
suppression systems into each of our homes: Renton felt that it would take extra time to arrive at
our residences if it were necessary to respond to a fire emergency. This problem is magnified if
plat 'B' is zoned at the same density as Sundance. When I sat in on the planning meeting two
weeks ago, the East Renton CPA was discussed. The Planning Department discovered that if the
density was lowered from the previous plan, it would result in a net benefit to Renton, primarily
because the number of residents would be lower, the house values would be higher (resulting in
higher property taxes due the city) and the burden to infrastructure (utilities, and life and safety)
would be less. The same issues apply here.
The third effect of zoning plat 'B' as R-8 is the impact to property values. As an example, the
starting prices for the houses in Sundance, also zoned as R-8, started at approximately $350,000,
and many exceeded $400,000. These prices are a rarity with higher density single family
dwellings. Generally, developers choose to achieve this price range with larger property sizes.
The issue is plat 'B' is nearly twice the size of Sundance. It would be easier to keep a consistent
price level ifplat 'B' were zoned as lower density, perhaps R-5 or lower. There is a similar
concern with plat' A', which is planned for R-IO. Looking at the current plan, I see that the
buffer zone between this plat and Sundance is planned as half the distance as the same type
buffer zone to the west of Sundance. What this ail means is a comparatively higher density
(approximately 25%) extremely close to Sundance, as well as a completely different character,
since R-J 0 is essentially attached housing -not quite condominiums or townhouses, but
extremely close.
Lastly, the wildlife will necessarily suffer as a result of developing plat 'B' at all. This is
particularly concerning considering an Environmental Review resulted in a Determination of
Non-Significance. Not only is there a stream nearby and many trees in the property in question,
but we also routinely see flickers and hawks in the greenbelts surrounding Sundance. In the last
month, we have spotted several osprey, as well as at least one doe. Zoning plat 'B' as R-8 will
necessarily vacate these animals to other areas. Zoning as R-5 may mitigate this somewhat, but
I'm not confident this will be enough. Additionally, I note that just outside the Renton City
Limits surrounding the WSDOT CPA is King County's Special Overlay (SO-220) that catalogs
and restricts removal of certain kinds trees. My concern is zoning this plat as R-8 will be
inconsistent with King County's overlay.
These are my immediate concerns with this rezone. None of them are insignificant to residents of
Sundance, nor are they insignificant to the City of Renton, or, I would surmise, the surrounding
residents immediately outside the Renton City Limits. I hope you will take these issues into
consideration for this CPA.
s~
Eric R. Hanson
Cc: Natalie Dohrn
Cc: Eric Cameron
Cc: Jerrilynn Hadley
Cc: Geraldine Jackson
Cc: Rosemary Quesenberry
Cc: Eugene Ledbury
Cc: Ray Giometti
On the :;( {; day of 5~/f!!P-u
States, a sealed envelope conta lng
ff'.{<;·~nah"f ·9l~ei->I-le-II,,;;
, 2003, I deposited in the mallsoi the United
documents. This infomnation was sent to:
Representing
(Signature of Sender)
1 ! :8 ","" 'r' tt.D\ -s
J{e 7= ~1" Ie' / ~ -'-0;;
, cS>'. PUB\-\ /0;1: : ~ ".,A °0 .'~ ~ ~, '1"' .... 6-29.01 .• ' 0 .:
) SS " " •••••.•.•••• ~~-: STATE OF WASHINGTON
"" OF WASV' _--COUNTY OF KING) I"\,,,,,,~ •• ,,,
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that i!1~ CUi W signed this
instrument and acknowledged it to be hislher/their free and volunta Set for the uses and purposes mentioned
In the instrument.
Dated:A1 30" Jo{?!;
Notary Pub!ic and for e State of Washi
, MARILYN KAMCHEFf
Notary (~nnt) 1,wAPe8INlMENHXPIRES 6 aQ Ql MyappOintmen explres:, ________ _
Project Name:
Project Number:
NOTARY.OOC
.
Dept. of Ecology'
Environmental Review Section
PO Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
WSDOT Northwest Region'
Attn: Ramin Pazooki
King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240
PO Box 330310
Seattle, WA 98133-9710
US Army Corp. of Engineers'
Seattle District Office
Attn: SEPA Reviewer
PO Box C-3755
Seattle, WA 98124
Jamey Taylor
Depart. of Natural Resources
PO Box 47015
Olympia, WA 98504-7015
KC Dev. & Environmental Servo
Attn: SEPA Section
900 Oakesdale Ave. SW
Renton, WA 98055-1219
Metro Transit
Senior Environmental Planner
Gary Kriedt
201 South Jackson Street
KSC-TR-0431
Seattle, WA 981IWseW
Seattie Publip'U1iIilies
Real Estatlf~niices -,
Eric Swenrison
700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900
Seattle, WA981 04-5004
,
AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING
(ERC DETERMINATIONS)
WDFW -Stewart Reinbold' Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. '
clo Department of Ecology Attn. SEPA Reviewer
3190 160·h Ave SE 39015 -172nd Avenue SE
Bellevue, WA 98008 Aubum, WA 98092
Duwamish Tribal Office' Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program'
14235 Ambaum Blvd. SW -Front A Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert
Burien, WA 98166 39015 172nd Avenue SE
Auburn, WA 98092-9763
KC Wastewater Treatment Division' Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation'
Environmental Planning Supervisor Attn: Stephanie Kramer
Ms. Shirley Marroquin PO Box 48343
201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-OSO Olympia, WA 98504-8343
Seattle WA 98104-3855
City of Newcastle City of Kent
Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP
Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director
13020 SE 72nd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South
Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895
Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila
Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official
Joe Jainga 6300 South center Blvd.
PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-D1W Tukwila, WA 98188
Bellevue, WA 98009-0868
,
;
Noie~'lftha NOlic$:of' Application states that it is an "Optional DNS*, the marked agencies and
c~ies will need to'be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application .•
Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices he gets his from the web. Only send her
the ERC Detenmination paperwork.
Last printed 07122103 9:40 AM
CITY OF REN.J:ON
"""", ~U~ENT~~LANNING"DlVl~ION
'AFFIDAVIT 'oF SERVICE BVMAlLING ,"
On the ~~ day of 'S~'I2t~'1:J 6d , 2003, I deposited in the mails of the United
States, a sealed envelope containrng
Le lire ct£ E;.gc Y£ierm "'10/; DO -I . ' ii, , ! (,
J
documents. This information was sent to:
Name ReQresenti!!Q
pez. (..f -( ~-7 c0 R '" cord S c"<> .4-1" J,. "j Lisl
I)
~""'~~'~'\\" " KAA{ 'I --....... -( ~ .... Ck~ I.,
E ~~~'<jb'V" ~.t ... ,'<'-'. .... ...0 ~. '"<\ "
STATE OF WASHINGTON
d-rl!y ~V'ki ! ~ :;J _,oT ABy. \\ ~ ~ :0 " en ~ ~ ~ : ...... : ~
) ~ .ft;' PUBLIC. ! ;;::
)SS ~";...\ ... O~
(Signature of Sender)
COUNTY OF KING ) \ • .,,.;:.· .. ~29.0: ... -:.,.~ j'
'. '<" •••••••• y..\'<" --
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that f~ b r"",b41'~; WAS "",--signed this
instrument and acknowledged H to be hisJher/their free and volunact for the uses ana purposes mentioned
in the instrument.
c.
Dated: ~i: 50) ~OQs . /} ) r...i .
Notary Public in and for the State of Wa ington
'_/ "
Notary (Print)-:-_IMI~ftKll\MElIIEIT-____ _
My appointment e~ 6 29 81
Project Name:· T /' -v f lOS17D La"( [.0o,
Project Number:
NOTARY.DOC
#2003-M-Ol, WSDOT Carr Road
Henry J. Bevil
520 South 46t
" Place
Renton, WA 98055
W.G. Paulson
51 0 South 47'" Street
Renton, WA 98055
Matthew Coder
4701 Smithers Avenue S
Renton, WA 98055
Ed & Shannon Wolfe
700 S. 47'" Street
Renton, WA 98055
Karen Sipes
4518 Talbot Road S
Renton, WA 98055
Kristi Meyer
4632 Morris Aven ue S
Renton, WA 98055
Tammarrian Rogers
706 S. 47'" Street
Renton, wA 98055
Paul & Lois Gibler
18404102"' Avenue SE
Renton, WA 98055
Lance Schaefer
140041451
" Avenue SE
Renton, WA 98059
Alice Daniels
4702 Morris Street S
Renton, WA 98055
Eleanor Johnson
4714 Morris Avenue S.
Renton, WA 98055-6374
San deep Mangla
724 S. 475h Street
Renton, WA 98055
Stefan Miller
10204 SE 196t
" Street
Renton, WA 98055
Patrick Forinash
WSDOT
Real Estate Service Office
P. O. Box 47338
Olympia, WA 98504-7338
Doug MacDonald
718 S 47'" Street
Renton, WA 98055
Harold A. Pete
4200 Smithers Avenue S., D 101
Renton, WA 98055
Susan Clay
4708 Smithers Avenue S
Renton, WA 98055
Renda Feller
4635 Morris Avenue S, Unit H
Renton, WA 98055
Michael W. Grady
730 S. 47'" Street
Renton, WA 98055
Aloysius Cantor
3600 Morris Avenue S
Renton, WA 98055
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION & PUBLIC HEARING
ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS)
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION
PROJECT NAME~ WSDOT CARR ROAD, CPA 12003-M-1
PflOJECT NUMBER: LUA-OH65, CPA, A, ECF
Proposed nOl'l-projecl action Camp Plan Amendment/Rezone 10 change the land use
designalions shown on the Land Use Map for this 55-acre site from Residential Rural
(RR) with R-1 zoning to a combination of RR, Residential Options (RO), and Resldentlar
Single Family (RS), with concurrent zoning to R-5, R-a and R-l0, (See attached
app~cation narrative.) Staff notes that the proposal Is supported by a number offand
use policies, that a potential 169 new residential units would generate approximately
1,690 average weekday trip ends (845 round tnps) that would be divided amongst al
least three separate access points (one ol'llh$ SOUth side and two on the north side 01
the 55-acre site). Because of the site's environmental sensitivity (Panther Creek
traverses It), steep slopes, and uninventoried on-site wildlife, environmentalana\ysis will
have to be conducted prior to any lutl.lre development on it.~: The site is located
south ofearr RoadlS 17911> Street and east of Talbot Road South. It abuts S. 41" Street
on the south and unincorporated King County on to the south and east
TlfE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT AND
HAS ISSUED A DETERMINATION OF NON·SIGNIFICANCE (DNS).
APPEALS OF THE Et-rvtRONMENTAL DETERMINATION MUST BE FILED IN WRITING ON OR BEFORE 5:00 PM,
MONDAY, OCTOBER 13l\j, 2003. APPEALS MUST BE FILED IN WRITING TOGETHER WITH THE REQUIRED $75,00
APPLICATION FEE WITH: HEARING EXAMINER. CITY OF RENTON, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WA
98055, APPEALS TO TlfE EXAMINER ARE GOVERNED BY CITY OF RENTON MUMCIPAL CODE SeCTION 4-8.110.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE APPEAL PRocess MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE RENTON CITY
CLEl'IK'S OFFICE, (425)-430-6510.
A PUBLIC HEARING WIll. BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
CITY HALL, ON OCTOBER 15, 2003 AT 6.00 PM TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT.
FOR FURTHER I
CERTIFICATION
I'~~3F~~J~~ above document were poste,d ne91~
the described ~ro rty on
~'1'1<L'" Signed: ---=::::::::=:::::::::~::..1~-V--
ATTEST: Su cribed ~worn~l?efore me; a No~.Public, in and fo~r Slate of . Washingtonresidin~'l<~' ,onthe~ fA dayof'_~ (5t20~
/'
MARILYN KAMCHEFF
MY N'I'QN1lDTfXPIlES lim7
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION & PUBLIC HEARING
ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS)
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION
PROJECT NAME: WSDOT CARR ROAD, CPA #2003-M-1
PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-01-165, CPA, R, ECF
Proposed non-project action Comp Plan AmendmenVRezone to change the land use
designations shown on the Land Use Map for this 55-acre site from Residential Rural
(RR) with R-l zoning to a combination of RR, Residential Options (RO), and Residential
Single Family (RS), with concurrent zoning to R-5, R-8 and R-l0. (See attached
application narrative.) Staff notes that the proposal is supported by a number of land
use policies, that a potential 169 new residential units would generate approximately
1,690 average weekday trip ends (845 round trips) that would be divided amongst at
least three separate access points (one on the south side and two on the north side of
the 55-acre site). Because of the site's environmental sensitivity (Panther Creek
traverses it), steep slopes, and uninventoried on-site wildlife, environmental analysis will
have to be conducted prior to any future development on it. Location: The site is located
south of Carr Road/S 179'h Street and east of Talbot Road South. It abuts S. 47th Street
on the south and unincorporated King County on to the south and east.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERG) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT AND
HAS ISSUED A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS).
APPEALS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION MUST BE FILED IN WRITING ON OR BEFORE 5:00 PM,
MONDAY, OCTOBER 13TH , 2003. APPEALS MUST BE FILED IN WRITING TOGETHER WITH THE REQUIRED $75.00
APPLICATION FEE WITH: HEARING EXAMINER, CITY OF RENTON, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WA
98055. APPEALS TO THE EXAMINER ARE GOVERNED BY CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 4-8-110.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE APPEAL PROCESS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE RENTON CITY
CLERK'S OFFICE, (425)-430-6510.
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
CITY HALL, ON OCTOBER 15, 2003 AT 6:00 PM TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200.
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
Please Include the projectNI:JMBER when calling for,proper file,Jdentlflclitlon_
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
RENTON, WASHINGTON
The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following
project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code.
WSDOT CARR ROAD, CPA #2003-M-l
LUA-01-165,CPA,R,ECF
Proposed non-project action Comp Plan Amendment/Rezone to change the land use designations shown
on the Land Use Map for this 55-acre site from Residential Rural (RR) with R-l zoning to a combination of
RR, Residential Options (RO), and Residential Single Family (RS), with concurrent zoning to R-5, R-8 and
R-l0. Location: The site is located south of Carr Road/S 179'h Street and east of Talbot Road South. It
abuts S. 47th Street on the south and unincorporated King County on to the south and east.
A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Planning Commission in the Council Chambers, City Hall, on
October 15, 2003 at 6:00 PM to consider the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments & Rezones for
this site.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on October 13,
2003. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing
Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are
governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal
process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510.
Publication Date: September 29, 2003
Account No. 51067
dnspub
·:Iit CITY" RENTON
PlanningIBuildinglPublicWorks Department
Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator Jesse Tanner, Mayo
September 2 . ' 2003
Washington tate
Department Ecology
Environment I Review Section
PO Box 4770
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
Subject: Environmental Determinations
Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by
the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on September 23, 2003:
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
WSDOT CARR ROAD, CPA #2003-M-1
LUA-01-165,CPA,R,ECF
Proposed non-project action Comp Plan Amendment/Rezone to change the land use
designations shown on the Land Use Map for this 55-acre site from Residential Rural
(RR) with R-1 zoning to a combination of RR. Residential Options (RO), and Residential
Single Family (RS), with concurrent zoning to R-5. R-8 and R-10. (See attached
application narrative.) Staff notes that the proposal is supported by a number of land use
policies, that a potential 169 new residential units would generate approximately 1,690
average weekday trip ends (845 round trips) that would be divided amongst at least three
separate access points (one on the south side and two on the north side of the 55-acre
site). Because of the site's environmental sensitivity (Panther Creek traverses it), steep
slopes, and un inventoried on-site wildlife, environmental analysis will have to be
conducted prior tg any future development on it. Location: The site is lo~ted south of
Carr Road/S 179 Street and east of Talbot Road South. It abuts S. 47 Street on the
south and unincorporated King County on to the south and east.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM,
Monday, October 13th , 2003. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00
application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055.
Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional
information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-
6510.
all me at (425) 430-6581.
Don Erickson, AICP
Senior Planner
cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division
WDFW, Stewart Reinbold
David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources
WSDOT, Northwest Region
Duwamish Tribal Office ~
Rod Malcom, Fisheries. Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) ----!PI4<A9*liI&6S;6a;o.Gl,;alall>,<"e"'Ft'l;,-l>~II<~""'G",k"'19"6RR<Q"'Q"'t.-;G;Y"lIllt""'r~all-lR,"Q"'",Q"urr<G~esS-l'~"<O>QglI'''''''''''---------R E N TON
US Armyl06tPSoilfh1~Way -Renton, Washin~on 98055
Stephanie Kramer, Offic'$/.)ffi~~91gQX";~,,tt~,t't~Jieli'.\'1O~w~gJip.~o'too","me, AHEAD OF THE CURVE.
CITY OF RENTON
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-D1-165,CPA,R,ECF
APPLICANT: City of Renton
PROJECT NAME: WSDOT Carr Road, CPA #2003-M-l
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposed non-project action Comp Plan Amendment/Rezone to
change the land use designations shown on the Land Use Map for this 55-acre site from Residential
Rural (RR) with R-l zoning to a combination of RR, Residential Options (RO), and Residential Single
Family (RS), with concurrent zoning to R-5, R-8 and R-l0. (See attached application narrative.) Staff
notes that the proposal is supported by a number of land use policies, that a potential 169 new residential
units would generate approximately 1,690 average weekday trip ends (845 round trips) that would be
divided amongst at least three separate access points (one on the south side and two on the north side of
the 55-acre site). Because of the site's environmental sensHivity (Panther Creek traverses it), steep
slopes, and uninventoried on-site wildlife, environmental analysis will have to be conducted prior to any
future development on it.
LOCATION OF PROPOSA~: The site is located south of Carr Road/S 179'" Street and east of Talbot
Road South. It abuts S. 47' Street on the south and unincorporated King County on to the south and
east.
LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton
Department of PlanninglBuilding/Public Works
Development Planning Section
This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of
jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on
October 13, 2003.
Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner,
City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are govemed by
City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may
be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510.
PUBLICATION DATE:
DATE OF DECISION:
SIGNATURES:
"'Lee eler, Fn'eChJe
Renton Fire Department
dnssignature.doc
September 29, 2003
September 23, 2003
DATE I
DATE
·:Iit
Jesse Tanner, Mayor
September 26, 2003
Parties of Record
Various Locations
SUBJECT: WSDOT Carr Road, CPA #2003-M-1
LUA·01·165,CPA,R,ECF
Dear Parties of Record:
CITY FRENTON
PlanningIBuildinglPublicWorks Department
Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator
This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that
they h ave completed their review of the environmental impacts of the a bove-referenced project. The
Committee, on September 23, 2003, decided that this project will be issued a Determination of Non-
Significance.
The City of Renton ERC has determined that this non-project action does not have a probable significant
adverse impact on the environment. A n Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under
RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6-6,
Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file
with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM,
Monday, October 13'h, 2003. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00
application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, W A 98055.
Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional
information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-
6510.
A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Planning Commission in the Council Chambers, City Hall, on
October 15, 2003 at 6:00 PM to consider the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified.
If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-6581.
For the Environmental Rev' w
C~L~
Don Erickson, AICP
Senior Planner
dnslette'''r.d''''oc,.----------------------------R E N T ~O N
1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 * This paper C:OrlldlnS 5:1':{, r(~::ycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE
CITY OF RENTON
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-01-165,CPA,R,ECF
APPLICANT: City of Renton
PROJECT NAME: WSDOT Carr Road, CPA #2003-M-1
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposed non-project action Comp Plan Amendment/Rezone to
change the land use designations shown on the Land Use Map for this 55-acre site from Residential
Rural (RR) with R-1 zoning to a combination of RR, Residential Options (RO), and Residential Single
Family (RS), with concurrent zoning to R-5, R-8 and R-10_ (See attached application narrative.) Staff
notes that the proposal is supported by a number of land use policies, that a potential 169 new residential
units would generate approximately 1,690 average weekday trip ends (845 round trips) that would be
divided amongst at least three separate access points (one on the south side and two on the north side of
the 55-acre site). Because of the site's environmental sensitivity (Panther Creek traverses it), steep
slopes, and un inventoried on-site wildlife, environmental analysis will have to be conducted prior to any
future development on it.
LOCATION OF PROPOSA~: The site is located south of Carr Road/S 179'h Street and east of Talbot
Road South. It abuts S. 47' Street on the south and unincorporated King County on to the south and
east.
LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton
Department of Planning/Building/Public Works
Development Planning Section
This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of
jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on
October 13, 2003.
Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner,
City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by
City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may
be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510.
PUBLICATION DATE:
DATE OF DECISION:
SIGNATURES:
Renton Fire Department
dnssignature.doc
September 29, 2003
September 23, 2003
DATE I
DATE I \ '
DATE
ENVIR IMENTAL REVIEW .~nM
MEETING NOTICE
SEPTEMBER 23, 20'03
.
To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator
Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator
Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief
From: Jennifer, .. , .... n, '!.j, Development Planning
Meeting Date: September 23, 2003
Time: 9:00AM
.
Location: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620
Agenda listed below.
Safewav Retail P,d on 2"" (Consent! (Callin!
LUA-03-OB1,ECF,SA·A
The appticant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Review for a new 10,250 square foot building
addition to the existing Safeway store located on the site. The addition is intended to house a variety of retail and commerciaj uses. The
proposed addition is would match the existing Safeway store in height and design. Location: 203 South 2" Street.
Brandal VillaR' Short Pial (JorcIan!
LUA·03-OB2,ECF,SHPL·H
The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Short Plat Approval for a 7-Iot subdivision of a 2.6·acre
site. The residential plat would create seven lots intended for the construction of detached single family homes -ranging in lot size from
4,B73 square feet to 7,655 square feet The subject site contains a 24,270 square foot welland that has been designated as a category 2
welland requiring a 50·foot wetiand buffer. The welland is located on the eastem half of the property. As part of this development
proposal. the appOcant has requested to utinze wefland buffer averaging along the western welland buffer edge In order to reduce the
required 50-foot wide buffer to 25 feel This reduction would allow for the construction of a new 16·foot wide private (alley) road. which
has been designed to serve the seven proposed tots (rear loaded units). Location: 623 Union Avenue NE
East Renton Plateau PAA Compo Plan Amendments (Ericksonl
LUA·01·168,CPA,ECF,R
The City is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment of its 2,700 aCie East Renton Plateau
Potential Annexation Area. The analysis of future capacity for this area assumed that the majority of new development would occur on
the rema'lning developable 367 acres identified in the County Buildable Lands Study.
Location: The East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area is defined as the area within Renton's PM north of Maple Valley Highway,
east of 134~ Avenue SE to the Urban Growth Area boundary. A portion of the subject 2,70()..acre site located north ofNE Sunset
Boulevard has already been prezoned to R·1 and R·5 and will not change under this proposed CPA. /4Jso, there may be development at
higher densities than penniHed by the proposed new land use designa~ons due to Sewer Availability Certificates previoosly issued by the
City based upon r-5 zoning in the RR portions and R-8 zoning in the RS portions of the subject CPA area.
WSDOT Carr Road, CPA #2903·M·1 (Erickson!
LUA-01·16S,CPA,ECF ,R
Proposed non-project action Comp Plan Amendment/Rezone to change the land use designations shown on the Land Use Map for this
55·acre site from Residential Rural (RR) with R·l zoning to a combination of RR, Residential Options (RO), and Residential Single Family
(RS), with concurrent zoning to R·5, R-8 and R·l0. Location: The site is located south of Carr Road/S 179~ Street and east ofTalbot
Road South. It abulll S. 47~ Street on the south and unincorporated King County on the south and east.
cc: J. Tanner. Mayor
J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
A Pietsch. EDNSP Director ®
J. Gray, Fire Prevention
N. Watts, PIBIPW Development Services Director ®
F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner
L Rude, Fire Prevention ®
J. Medzeglan. Council
S. Meyer. PIBIPW Transportation Systems Director
R. Lind. Economic Development
l. Warren. City Attorney ®
STAFF
REPORT
A. BACKGROUND
ERC MEETING DATE
Project Name
Applicant
File Number
Project Description
Project Location
Exist. Bldg. Area gsf
Site Area
City of Renton
Department of Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
September 23, 2003
WSDOT Carr Road, CPA #2003-M-l
City of Renton
LUA-01-165, CPA,R,ECF Project Manager Don Erickson
Proposed non-project action Comp Plan AmendmentlRezone to change the land use
designations shown on the Land Use Map for this 55-acre site from Residential Rural
(RR) with R-I zoning to a combination of RR, Residential Options (RO), and
Residential Single Family (RS), with concurrent zoning to R-5, R-8 and R-I0. (See
attached application narrative.)
Staff notes that the proposal is supported by a number of land use policies, that a
potential 169 new residential units would generate approximately 1,690 average
weekday trip ends (845 round trips) that would be divided amongst at least three
separate access points (one on the south side and two on the north side of the 55-acre
site).
Because of the site's environmental sensitivity (Panther Creek traverses it), steep
slopes, and uninventoried on-site wildlife, environmental analysis will have to be
conducted prior to any future development on it.
The site is located south of Carr Road/S 179"' Street and east of Talbot Road South.
It abuts S. 47'h Street on the south and unincorporated King County on to the south
and east.
N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf NI A
55-acres Total Building Area gsf NI A
B. RECOMMENDATION
Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials
make the following Environmental Determination:
x
DETERMINATION OF
NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period.
Issue DNS with 15 day Connnent Period with
Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period.
Project Location Map
DETERMINATION OF
NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED.
Issue DNS·M with 15 day Comment Period with
Concurrent 14 da A eal Period.
Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed
by a 14 day Appeal Period.
ERe STAFF REPORT.doc
City of Renton EDNSP Deportment
WSDOT Carr RoadComprehensive Plan Amendment and Concurreflt Rezones
REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER /6. 2003
C MITIGATION MEASURES
Envirc Jtal Review Committee Staff Report
LUA-OI-I65, CPA, R, ECF
Pagelof4
No mitigation measures identified. However, prior to the time of project level development an environmental
assessment is likely because of the environmental sensitivity of portions of this 55-acre site.
D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
In compliance with Rew 43.2 J C.240, the following project environmentaJ review addresses only those impacts that are not adequately addressed
under existing development standards and environmental reg!tialiolls.
Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed
development?
1. Housiug
Impacts: Under current R-l zoning on the site an estimated 26 units could be built. Under the recommended map
amendments that would require concurrent R-5, R-8, and R-l0 zoning, 143 additional units could theoretically be
developed on the 55-acre site.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are recommended for this non-project action.
Nexus: N/A
CAPACITY ANALYSIS
MODELED THEORETICAL
CAPACITY
Existing R-Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Total with
1 Zoning R-10 R-8 R-5 R-1 New
<:!: 55 acres) Zoning Zoning Zoning Zouiug Designations
(13.88 (8.14 (8.37 (24.61
Gross acres) acres) acres) acres) Areas "A",
Areas "A", "B", "C",
"B", "C", Area "A" Area "B" Area "e" Area "D" and "D"
and "D"
Net Acreage 26.24 7.43 4.70 5.41 8.7 26.24
Maximum 1 du/net 13 du/uet 8 du/net 5 du/net 1 dulnet
Density acre acre acre acre acre
Estimated 26 units 96 units 37 units 27 units 9 units 169 units
Number of (R-8)
Units based (125 with R-
on Buildable 21 units 50nAreaB)
Lands (RS)
ERC STAFF REPORT .doc
City of Renton EDNSP Department
WSDOT Carr RoadComprehensive Plan Amenament and Concllrrent Rezones
Envir< Ital Review Committee Staff Report
LUA-Ol-165, CPA, R, ECF
REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER J 6. 2003 Page30/4
2. Transportation'
Impacts: Under the R-10 zoning an estimated 96 units could be built. With 6.59 AWDTEs* per unit these would
generate an estimated 633 additional trip ends per day. Under the R-8 zoning an estimated 37 detached units could be
built. With 9.57 AWDTEs* per unit these would generate an estimated 354 additional trip ends per day. Under the
R-5 zoning an estimated 27 detached units could be built. With 9.57 AWDTEs' per unit these would generate an
estimated 258 additional trip ends per day. The combined total under the new zoning would be 1,245 A WDTEs.
Under the current zoning there theoretically could be 26 detached units which, with 9.57 A WDTEs* per unit, would
result in 249 A WDTEs. The estimated difference between the number of trips allowed under the current Residential
Rural land use designation with R-1 zoning and the proposed Residential Options, Residential single Family and
Residential Rural designations with R-IO, R-8, R-5 and R-I zoning is 996 AWDTEs. Of these A WDTEs 891 would
ingress and egress off of Carr Roadl179 th Street SE with the remaining 354 A WDTEs ingressing and egressing off
102 nd Avenue SE and then to SR-167 or SR-515.
King County Transportation is currently undertaking studies that would widen andlor possibly relocate portions of
Carr Roadl179 th Street SE in order to increase capacity as well as to provide bike lanes on this community arterial.
More detailed analysis at the time project level development will help determine actual A WDTE counts and their
probable location. In addition, the City collects a Transportation Impact Mitigation Fee of $75.00 per each A WDTE,
or an estimated $74,700.
*Intcrnational Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 6 th Edition, 1998_
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are recommended for this non-project action.
Nexus: N/A
3. Public Services
Impacts: An estimated 143 additional units will have probable impacts on existing city services such as fire and
parks. Assuming all future units are detached, there would be a fire mitigation fee of $488 per unit or $69,784 if all
units were built. If half the units in the R-1O zone attached this mitigation fee would drop to $54,248. The City also
collects a Parks & Recreation Mitigation Fee of $530.76 per detached unit and $354.51 per multi-family unit. If all
future 169 units were detached the mitigation fee for parks would be $89,698 and if half of the units in the R-10 zoned
portion were attached (multifamily) the parks mitigation fee would be $81,238. Attached is a letter regarding the need
for additional park and recreation space in the area to serve existing and proposed new development and suggesting
that consideration be giving to using all or part of the site for park use.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are recommended for this non-project action.
Nexus: N/A
4. Water
Impacts: Panther Creek traverses the eastern portion of the site on a diagonal from the southeast comer exiting near
the middle of the site at its north. No wetlands have been delineated on the site at this time. Future_development will
likely have to comply with the King County Surface Water Design Manual Level II flow control requirements.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are recommended for this non-project action.
Nexus: N/A
ERG STAFF REPORT.doc
City of Renton EDNSP Department
WSDOT Carr RoadComprehensive Plan Amenament and COllcurrent Rezones
REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 16. 2003
5. Animals
Envirc ltai Review Committee Staff Report
LUA-Ol-165, CPA, R, ECF
Page40/4
Impacts: This proposed non-project action would have no impact on wildlife on the 55-acre site. However, the
proposed increase in density that might result from changing portions of the R-1 zoning now on the site to R-lO, R-8
and R-5 zoning could have future impacts on wildlife at the project level. An environmental analysis (SEPA) will be
required for all non-exempt projects prior to their development.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are recommended for this non-project action.
Nexus: NIA
E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS
The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental I Divisional Revil!wer~· for their review. Where applicable. these comments have been incorporated
into the lext o/this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applica"t.
_L Copies o/all Review Comments are contained ill lire Official File.
_ Copies of all Rel';ew Comments are attached to this report ..
Advisory Notes to Applicant:
The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because
these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations.
1. A stream and wetland delineation report must be provided with any development application. The report must either show
where the all streams and wetlands are located on the subject 55-acre site or portions of it if they are developed independently.
2. A habitat data report will need to be conducted on this site to identify wildlife habitat and nesting areas prior to any
development occurring on it. A note to this effect will be recorded on the City'S Sierra Permit system by parcel number for
future land use actions.
Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed
iu writing on or before 5:00 PM on October 13, 2003.
Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of
Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton
Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the
Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510.
ERG STAFF REPORT.doc
APPLICATION 2003-M-Ol LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT
TO CHANGE DESIGNATION FOR PORTIONS OF SITE FROM RESIDENTIAL RURAL
TO A COMBINATION OF RESIDENTIAL RURAL, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, AND
CENTER INSTITUTION. TO CHANGE ZONING FOR PORTIONS OF SITE FROM
RESIDENTIAL -1 DUlAC TO RESIDENTIAL - 8 DUlAC, RESIDENTIAL -10 DUlAC, AND
COMMERCIAL OFFICE
OWNER: Washington Department of Transportation
APPLICANT: Washington Department of Transportation
DESCRIPTION
The applicant's proposal is to change the Comprehensive Plan land use designation for portions of a ±
55-acre site from Residential Rural to a combination of Residential Rural (RR), Residential Single
Family (RS), Residential Options (RO), and Center Institution (CI). The site is located south of Carr
RoadiS 179th Street and east of Talbot Road South.
ISSUE SUMMARY
1. Whether overall the property has development potential that should be recognized through
redesignation to a higher-intensity land use allowing commercial or residential activity or, whether
the property should remain in RR as part of an urban separator with low-density, single-family
land use.
2. If it is determined that RR is no longer appropriate for this site, which of several options are
appropriate?
Area A
Are proposed office uses appropriate for this area given the present market for office in the
City and the City Council's adopted strategy for the location of office development?
AreaB
Is the RO land use designation and R-IO zoning appropriate for this area given its geographic
isolation and access constraints? Because of this area's limited accessibility, would the RR
land use designation and R-5 zoning be more appropriate? •
AreaC
Whether the RS land use designation and R-8 zoning is a good fit for this area given R-8
zoning to the south in the City and R -1 and R -6 zoning to the south in King County?
AreaD
Whether the interior of the parcel as defined by ravines and stream courses should remain in
the RR designation with R-l zoning?
RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
Support re-designation of this site to a more intensive land use since the site's prior use for gravel
excavation has been discontinued and the property has multiple areas that are adequate for
redevelopment Specifically, staff is recommending the following:
Map Amendment#2oo~ ~~"()I
Page 2
StaffRecornmendation
7/312003
a. Area A. Change the RR designation and R-I zoning in the northwest comer of the site to RO
with concmrent R-IO zoning, rather than Commercial Office (CO) as requested by the applicant
b. Area B. Change the RR designation and R-I zoning in the southern portion of the site to RS
with concurrent R-8 zoning; consistent with the applicant's request for this area;
c. Area C. Retain the RR designation in the northeast comer of the site but change the
implementing zoning from R-I to R-5, rather than R·IO as requested by the applicant, and
d. Area D. Retain the RR designation with R-l zoning over those portions of the site that are most
environmentally sensitive (steep slopes, Panther Creek, etc.); also consistent with the applicant's
request.
BACKGROUND
The subject site is a former quarry that is characterized by trees, ravines, shrubs and secondary growth.
Panther Creek runs from the southeast comer of the site diagonally to the north approximately midway
between the east and west property lines. Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDO'I)
mined gravel at the site and used it for road construction and maintenance for many years. lbis use of
the property has been exhausted and the agency plans to surplus the site as one parcel. WSDOT is
looking for the highest and best use of the property for future redevelopment, and has identified office
and residential development for potential re-use of the site. At this point there is no specific
redevelopment project proposed. Figure 1 shows the location of the site south of Carr Road/South
179'" Street, and east of Talbot Road South.
Site Characteristics
Steep slopes and ravines running through the middle of the site physically constrain access and the
development potential of the area as shown on Figures 2, 3, and 4. These critical areas also divide the
site into four separate parts.
• Area "A" is 13.88 acres in size and is considered to have 7.43 net developable acres. It is
SWTOunded on 75% of its perimeter by steep slopes and critical areas.
• Area "B" on the south of the site is 8.14 acres in size and is considered to have a net
developable area of 4. 70 acres. It abuts R-8 zoning in Renton and R-6 zoning in King County.
AJ?Pfoximately 60"10 of its perimeter is defined by steep slopes and critical areas.
• Area "c" is 8.37 acres in size and is considered to have 5.41 net developable acres.
Approximately 40% of its perimeter is defined by steep slopes and critical areas.
• Area "D", the largest area of the 55-acre site consists of approximately 24.6 acres the maj ority
of which are defined as steep slopes, ravines and waterway. lbis area includes a portion of
Panther Creek and connects to the existing open spacelurban separator south of the southwest
comer of the site.
Existing Land Use and Zoning
The 55-acre site is currently designated RR on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and is zoned
R-l as shown on Figure 5. The RR land use designation was initially applied to the entire site since it
allowed mineral extraction and, at the time of the 1995 Comprehensive Plan review, the site was used
for quarrying. Minerallnatural resource recovery is an allowed use in the R-l zone. The purpose of
this designation is to preserve open space and natural resources and to protect environmentally
sensitive areas by limiting residential development in critical areas, an<i areas identified as part of a
citywide or regional open space network.
2OO2-M~1 Carr Rd.doc\ 2 7f3103
Map Amendment #2003-M-Ol
Page 3
Surrounding Area Land Use
Stall Kecommendation
7/3/2003
Properties to the north and west of Area "A" currently have the Center Institution (CI) and the
Residential Multi-family Infill (RM-I) land use designations. They are zoned CO and RM-I as shown
on Figure 5. An existing medical office building fronting on Carr Road and accessed from Smithers
Avenue South exists to the north of Area "A". There also is an existing multi-family complex to the
north also accessed from Smithers Avenue South.
The portion of the site identified as Area "B" abuts a Residential Single Family (RS) designation in
the City and a GreenbeltJUrban Separator and Urban Residential 4-12 dulac designation in King
County.' Properties to the north of Area "C" have RS and RR designations and are zoned R-8 and R-
1. The properties to the east of Area "C" in King County have the County's Urban Residential 4-12
dulac designation. The R-1 zoned properties to the west and south of the site are currently considered
to be part of an open spacehrrban separator network identified by both Renton and King County.
ANALYSIS
Redesignation to a Higher Intensity Land Use
The applicant's request for the area, shown on Figure 6, is CI with CO zoning for Area A, RS with R-
8 zoning for Area B, and RO with R-10 zoning for Area C. Area D would remain RR designation
with R-1 zoning. An alternative staff proposal for this area is shown in Figure 7.
With the site no longer used for mineral extraction it seems appropriate to evaluate its development
potential in light of adjacent uses, accessibility, critical areas, and economic trends in the area. With
more than 26.24 acres of the site free of critical areas, relatively level and accessible, it seems
reasonable to seek a higher and better use for these areas. This is especially true given the site's
proximity to SR-167 and 1-405, Valley Medical Center, Southcenter, and Sea-Tac Airport. Although
currently part of an open-space network, the entire site does need not be retained in RR to maintain an
open-space corridor in this area. Retaining R-1 zoning on a portion of the site heavily constrained by
critical areas (Area D) still provides a connection to the RR designation to the south.
Area "A"
The applicant has requested that Area "A" be designated CI in order to rezone the property to CO.
They believe that there may be a need for additional medical institutional uses in the area and note that
this area abuts areas zoned CO to the west and north. Staff does not support expanding the existing
Center Institution designation since there already is an abundance of CO zoned property in the area.
Valley Medical Center has not yet reached build·{JUt. There is no indication based upon the Valley
Medical Center's November 1991 Master Plan that they intend to expand eastward along Carr Road.
Also, there are no known post-secondary educational or health-<:are facilities that have expressed an
interest in expanding in this area. In addition, there is an adequate supply of CO-zoned land in the
Valley. Redesignation of Area "A" to CO would create an additional B.8-acre area estimated to have
the capacity to accommodate 707 new employees.
The Center Institution policies set forth mapping criteria for redesignation of property. The site
location does not comply with the criteria (see Policy LU-B8).
, The City is in discussions with King County to change this designation to Urban Residential 4-12 dnlac since
much of the area to the west and accessed from 102"" Avenue SE already is at 3 dulac or greater densities.
2002-M-ll1 Carr Rd.doc\ 3 713103
Map Amendment #200,,-,,([-0 I
Page 4
Staff Recommendation
7/312003
Policy LU-I38. Center Institution should be located:
a. contiguous to an existing or planned transit route;
b. in close proximity to commercial uses and major employment areas;
c. in areas with immediate access to an Interstate or a State route and in areas at the
intersection of two principal arterials; and
d. with vehicular access to the site from a principal arterial street with the number of
access points minimized but designed to ease entrance and exit.
The site is set back approximately 300' from Carr Road and is not contiguous to transit or a principal
arterial street. Given the site's relative isolation staff does not believe it would be a good location to
provide post-secondary education and/or health-care needs facilities.
Staff believes Area "A" would, however, lend itself to the RO land use designation, which is
encouraged in areas bordering Centers. Policy LU-16.1 encourages a mix. of residential use types
including single family and small-scale. multi-family housing types designed to look like single-
family development with groWld-related entries in areas bordering Center designations.
PoHcy LU-16.1. In areas bordering Center designations and in areas with an existing
mix of residential use types encourage a mix of single family and small scale multi-family
hOUSing types designed to look like single family development with ground related entries,
i. e. duplex, triplex, fourplex.
The objective of this designation is to create new planned residential neighborhoods in areas mapped
as RO which include a variety of writ types designed to incorporate fealmes from both single-family
and multi-family developments. Policy LU-50, below, estsblishes mapping criteria for the RO
designation.
PoHey LU-50. Residential neighborhoods may be considered jor the Residential Options
Designation if they meet three of the following criteria:
a. The area already has a mix of small-scale multi-family units or had long-standing
duplex or low-density multi-family zoning.
b. Development patterns are established.
c. Vaeont lots exist or parcels have redevelopment potential.
d. Few new roads or major utility upgrades will be needed with future development.
e. The site is located adjacent to a Center designation.
This 13.88 acre vacant site has redevelopment potential, is located next to a Center designation, and
would require few new roads or major utility upgrades to serve it. Staff supports the RO land use
designation with R-IO zoning for this area.
Area "8"
The applicant has proposed designating Area "B" RS. The designation is consistent with existing
single-family residential development to the south, both in the City and in the COWlty along the west
side of 102001 Avenue SE and the east side of 102001 Avenue SE. Staff also notes that the RS
designation is supported here by the following two land use policies.
Policy LU-I6. In established single-family neighborhoods and new low-density areas,
encourage single family housing types.
2OO2·M~1 Carr Rd.doc\ 4 7/3/03
WSDOT -Carr Rd. (2003-M-01) Fig.2-Aerial Map e Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning - - -Corporate Boundary
• am + Sue Carlson, Administrator -Study Area iift. G, Del Rosario
29 July 2002
o 300 600
I I I
1 : 7200
WSDOT -Carr Rd. (2003-M-01) Fig.3-Topography Map e Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning ---Corporate Boundary
+ lID + Sue Carlson, Adminimtor -Study Area ~ o. Del R08Orio
29 July 2002
o 300 600 I-
I I I
1 : 7200
.,
WSDOT -Carr Rd. (2003-M-01) Fig.4-Sensitive Areas e Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
.AM + Sue Carlson, Administrator ~ O. Del Rosario
29 Ju\y2002
f--------------------------r-----r-l--l
- - -Corporate Boundary
-Study Area
o 300 600
I I I
-Slide Hazzard Boundary
-Ditch/Creek
1 : 7200
... >40%Slope
-~'-,
I ,
I
i
S 179th
_ J
"----- -----------,
~ ------I flrl I I I I\~-
WSDOT -Carr Rd. o 500 1000 (2003-M-01) Fig.5-Existing Landuse and Zoning I I I e Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning IIIIIIII CI-center InsIItutIon EOl!lJ RPN.fl~ Plamed N~ 1 : 6000
+ .. + Sue Carlson. Administrator ... CS-center SUburban IIIIIIII RR Rul.lltlal RIlraI __ Corporate Boundary ~ O. Del Rosario IIIIIIII RlI-I·RasIdenIIaI t.fuItI.Farnlly InfIII = RS-ResIdenIIaI SIngle Family _ study Area
29 July 2002 = Ro-ResIdenIIaI 0p1I0n0 ... Steep Slopes
"
.'
S 179th
R-l0
II A II
"B"
WSDOT -Carr Rd. (2003-M-01) Fig. 7 -Staff Proposal-Landuse and Zoning o 500 1000
I I I e Economic Developm.n~ Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
+ a. + Sue Carlson. Administrator ift. O. Del Rosario
29 July 2002
1IIIIIIII CI-Center 1_
IIIIII!II cs-cenler Suburban
IIIIII!II AM-l-Resldenllel Mufti-Family InfID = AD-ResldenllalOptions
1 : 6000 = APN-Aesldential Planned Neighborhood
1IIIIIIII AA-Re_ Aural = AS-Ae~dentlal Single FamJfy - -Corporate BoundaJy
IIIIII!II Steep Slopes -Study Araa
City of Renton Department of Planning / Bui/ding / Public W "
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 22 2003
SITE AREA: + 55-acres
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: This City sponsored proposal is to the C8~~\i!~~~,~.slV:f,~!;~~;~~f
designation as well as the zoning designations for portions of . 1 "e.si(Iel-ltia~cS:I(i~lle. Reslaential Rural to a combination of Residential Rural (RRJ, "
(RS). Zoning would change from R-1 to a combination of R-10 (10 du/net
acre).
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Envjronment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth
Air
Water
Plants
Land/Shoreline Use U"lilies
Animals
Environmental Health
Energy/
Natural Resources
~
~
,i ,,"" > •• ,
d~d I
B. POLICY-RELATED C0:2k--
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS d~
We have reviewed this application with parUcular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and hav, iden -led areas of probable impact or
'~2J< ..... ".:::additjon information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Date
routing.doc Rev. 10/93
lepartment of Planning / Building / Public Works City of Rent
ENVIRONMENTAL & DE: :LOPMENT APPLICATIO REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COlAS \;Yc,,-chol\ c,'\)", COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 22, 2003
APPLICATION NO: LUA-01-165,CPA,ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 8,2003
APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Don Erickson All,. '-I V£'D
PROJECT TITLE: WSDOT Carr Rd. Compo Plan Amendment WORK ORDER NO: 78929 • .... u 1 T 200'.1
h IjUtt fl'
LOCATION: The + 55-acre site is located south of Carr Road/S 179' Street and east of Talbot Road SoI1111'.''\]8 Dill'S,
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: This City sponsored proposal is to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map
designation as well as the zoning desiflnations for portions of a:,:: 55-acre. The land use designations would change from
ResrClential Rural to a combination of ReSidential Rural (RR), Residential Options (RO), and Residential Single Family
(RS). Zoning would change from R-1 to a combination of R-10 (10 dulnet acre), R-5 (5 du/net acre), and R-8 (8 du/net
acre).
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
flament of the Probable Probable N.,. Elemrmt of fhe Probable Pro/nbl8 More
Environment MInor "_jOt' Information
Impacts Impacts lHeouary
Envlronme,U Mlnrx "ajor Information
Impads Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water LiH~t!Gfaf6
Plants Recreation
LandlShorelfne Use U/ilitles
An/mels Transportation
Environmental Health Pub/ic ServIces
Energy! HistOlic/Cuftural
Natural Resources Preservation
A;rporl Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
C. CODE·RELA TED COMMENTS
We have revisW8d this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where ditionallnformation is needed 10 properly assess this proposal. ,
Date
Rliv.10193
City of Rent--Department of Planning / Building / Public Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DE LOPMENT APPLICATIO REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:<;IAA' i-e.,ca/ Lt h",L" "~k-COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 22, 2003
APPLICATION NO: LUA-01-165,CPA,ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 8, 2003
APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Don Erickson RECEIVED
PROJECT TITLE: WSDOT Carr Rd. Compo Plan Amendment WORK ORDER NO: 78929 AUG 1 1 7nn~
LOCATION: The + 55-acre site is located south of Carr Road/S 179'h Street and east of Talbot Rlliffl %~uth.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: This City sponsored proposal is to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map
designation as well as the zoning deSignations forportions of a + 55-acre. The land use designations would change from
Reslcential Rural to a combination of Residential Rural (RR), Residential Options (RO), and Residential Single Family
(RS). Zoning would change from R-1 to a combination of R-10 (10 dulnet acre), R-5 (5 du/net acre), and R-B (8 dulnet
acre).
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of 'he PTDbatJie Probable Mo", ElemMtaflh. Probable Probable Mo",
Environment Minar Major lnfomlatiOl1
Impacts Impacts N.cessary
Environment Minor MaJor Informallon
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Ea~h ;o",in,
Air
Wate,
~ ~on.
~~;,
Ai,!,O_,! I . :~::~~r
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular ariantion to those areas in which we have G)(periise and have identified areas of probable impact or
arBas where additional infonna~on Is n ... dod to properly assess this proposal. '3 kt I
~D~at~e~I~~~~~-------------
Re .... 10193
City of Rento-
ENVIRONMENTAL & DE
Department of Planning / Building / Public Works
LOPMENT APPLICATIO REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ?\ 0\ '" ~',.Q~ COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 22, 2003 ClrY,
APPLICATION NO: LUA-01-165,CPA,ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 8,2003
APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Don Erickson AUG 17 .. ,
PROJECT TITLE: WSDOT Carr Rd. Camp. Plan Amendment WORK ORDER NO: 78929 BIII1
LOCATION: The + 55-acre site is located south of Carr Road/S 179'· Street and east of Talbot Road South'."" DIVISION
SITE AREA: + 55-acres I BUILDING AREA (gross): NIA
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: This City sponsored proposal is to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map
designation as well as the zoning designations forJlortions of a:t 55-acre. The land use designations would change from
ReslCiential Rural to a combination of Residential Rural (RR), Residential Options (RO), and Residential Single Family
eRS}. Zoning would change from R-1 to a combination of R-10 (10 du/net acre), R-5 (5 du/net acre), and R-8 (8 du/net
acre).
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g, Non-Code) COMMENTS
E/ameflt of 'he Probable Probable Moro EI.m~to''''. Probable Probable Moro
Environment Minor MajM Information
1m". ... Impacts Necessary
E""lronmenl Minot Major Information
ImpaCr5 Impacts Necessary
Earlh Housina
Air AesthellCs
Water UghVG/are
Plant~ Recreation
UndlShorelirte Use utilities
Animals TfansDortation
EfMfOt1mental Health Public Services
EnenJyI H;!lon'clCultufa}
Natural Resources Preservslion
Airport Environment
la,ooa Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
We have rell/ewed this application with particular atlent/on to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
aress where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
, .~
of Director or Authorized Representative
Rev, 10193
City of Rento-Departnient of Planning / Building / Public Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DE LOPMENT APPLICATIO REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:":h "-IL 'Y V JlAJ ..QA(l <.)'/1 COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 22, 2003
APPLICATION NO: LUA-01-165,CPA,ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 8, 2003
PROJECT MANAGER: .~ rilts~ P ,
-,
APPLICANT: City of Renton ," I:""" i , , ,
WORK ORDER NO: 789~~) lS 121 l'=o J ,~ ~ I I' : PROJECT TITLE: WSDOT Carr Rd, Compo Plan Amendmenl ',', I'
LOCATION: The + 55-acre site is located south of Carr Road/S 179'" Street and east:Jf;' Ibol,F,l,9,8d"sllut/,),no 1 ! !! 1
~ , J, ~
BUILDING AREA (gross)'-N/)(j
MUV , c"
\--' !, SITE AREA: + 55-acres
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: This City sponsored torOposal is to chan~e the Compreh,e nsive t'!art~an(fIJse; Ma~ I
designation as well as the zoning des~nations orJftortions of a + 5 -acre. The land ~\e~e~igr:!\t~pswould([ ange fro
Resloential Rural to a combination of esidential ural (RR), Residential Options (R, ' entiat'St~"h -~'::~!.
(RS), Zoning would change from R-1 to a combination of R-tO (10 du/nel acre), R-5 (5' dulnet acre), and R-(8 du/net
acre).
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e-9. Non-Code} COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Prob.bl. More
Ettvlronmenf Minor MajOl' infonnafion
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor MOJO#" Information
Impacts Impicls Nec85sary
Housing
Aesthetics
LignVGlare
I Recreation
Utilities
Trans aria lion
Public Services
Histon"c/Cultural
Preservation
Airporl Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
C_ CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
attention to those areas in which we have e)(perlise and have identifi d Bm8S of probable impact or
Signature of oirec
routing.dgc
perly assess this proposal.
Date
Rev, 10193
City of Rent--Department of Planning / Building / Public Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DE LOPMENT APPLICATIO REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Qu. 'S0 S. COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 22, 2003
APPLICATION NO: LUA-01-165 CPA.ECF.R DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 8, 2003
APPLICANT: City_of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Don Erickson
PROJECT TITLE: WSDOT Carr Rd. Camp. Plan Amendment WORK ORDER NO: 78929
LOCATION: The + 55-acre site is located south of Carr Road/S 179'h Street and east of Talbot Road South.
SITE AREA: + 55-acres [ BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: This City sponsored proposal is to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map
deSignation as well as the zoning desi!jnatlons for portions of a + 55-acre. The land use designations would change from
Reslaential Rural to a combination of Residential Rural (RR). Residential Options (RO). and Residential Single Family
(RS). Zoning would change from R-1 to a combination of R-10 (10 du/net acre), R-5 (5 du/net acre). and R-B (8 du/net
acre).
A, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Proluble ProbIIbJ. More EI.men' of the ProbaC/e Probabl.
Environment Minor MaiOI' Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major
Impact& Impacts
EarY1
Air
Water ~
Plants
LancilShoreline Use ~
Aroma's
Envirtlflmental Health PubUc Service'
EnoPJyl
Natural Resources
A:~:=~::~
S-epa rUfI4/rc£ foY future--d~Ph7°1-1
!~f(}Sd{5 .
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
Me",
InhNmation
Necessary
We have reviewed this application with particular affenUon to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
sress where additi aJ infl ation is needed to properly assess thi's proposal.
Date I
Rev. 10193
'epartment of Planning I Building I Public Works City of Rent
ENVIRONMENTAL & DE LOPMENT APPLICATIO REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ra ( Ie. <; COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 22, 2003b.
APPLICATION NO: LUA-01-165 CPA,ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 8, 2003 'l:::Cr.,
APPLICANT: City_ of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Don Erickson 4//" .... ~
'" ~ ....,
PROJECT TITLE: WSDOT Carr Rd. Comp. Plan Amendment WORK ORDER NO: 78929 1\ (" 8 /A
LOCATION: The + 55-acre site is located south of Carr RoadlS 179th Street and east of Talbot R~~1f~9,+t." -V(/.]
'r& "
SITE AREA: + 55-acres BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A 'I::~",,;c
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: This City sponsored proposal IS to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map y~s
designation as well as the zoning designations for portions of a .! 55-acre. The land use designations would change from
Reslcential Rural to a combination of Residential Rural (RR), Residential Options (RO), and Residential Single Family
(RS). Zoning would change from R-1 to a combination of R-10 (10 du/net acre), R-5 (5 dulnet acre), and R-8 (8 dulnet
acre).
A, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g, Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probabl. More EJemrmt of fhe Probable Probable More
Enylronment Minor M~OI' Information
Im,,-crs Impacts Necessary
Environment MlnOl MajeK information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
EM" Hcwsin
JJr Aesthetics
Water LighllGlare
Plants Recreation
LsncVShorefine Use Utilities
Anim.ls rransDorlettion
Environmental Health Public Servrces
Energy! Historlc/Cultural
Nrtlural Resources Preservation
Airport. Environment
10,OO() Feet
14,000 Feet
S, POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS ...J/
~ OA.R.... ;nD v?I~J{~ . cl'::, ;b j7 c:V7 ~
Ws have reviewed this application with particular attention 1a those areas in which we have e)tpertise and have identmed areas of probable impact or
8""'5 wh additiona/lnform.tio 5 ne.ded to P~:5S.55 this proposal. WHI jf3
Date
Rev. 10m
City af Rent--Department of Planning / Building / Public Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DE: :LOPMENT APPLICATIO REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: T \( C<.'" ":> 90 ( \<::L'1\ 00 COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 22, 2003
APPLICATION NO: LUA-OI-165,CPA ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 8, 2003
APPLICANT: CLty of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Don Erickson' ,J.:-f V f'll
PROJECT TITLE: WSDOT Carr Rd, Compo Plan Amendment WORK ORDER NO: 78929 "Vb i 1
LOCATION: The + 55-acre site is located south of Carr Road/S 179"' Street and east of Talbot ~/§elJY;l
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: This City sponsored proposal is to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map
designation as well as the zoning designations forportions of a + 55-acre. The land use designations would change from
Reslcential Rural to a combination of Residential Rural (RR), Residential Options (RO), and Residential Single Family
(RS). Zoning would change from R-1 to a combination of R-10 (10 du/net acre), R-5 (5 du/net acre), and R-8 (8 du/net
acre).
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Nan-Cade) COMMENTS
ElM1etU 01 the ProlHJble p-M.,. Ef""~nf of fhff Probable Probable Moro
Envll'Otufffm' Minor lIajor Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Iflnor MaIo< Information
Impacts Impacts Nee.ssary
Earth Housina
Air Aesttre/ics
Waler fJ3tIlIGfare
Plants Recreation
LandiShorelifle Use U"'h"~'e$
Animals Transportation
Etwironmenfal Hsslth Public Services
En.,.yI HistoricICultural
NriJral Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10.000 Feel
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
C. COOE-RELA TEO COMMENTS
~(\
W& have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have e)(pertise and have idenNfied areas 01 probable impact or
./11 s wher& Bddi' 81 fotmB~n is needed to properly Bssess this proposal, ~ I U L
nD~at~e~Lt~~~-------------
Rev, 10193
Don Erickson, Project Manager
Strategic Planning Division
EDNSP Department
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Kristi Meyer
4632 Morris Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
425-793-1051
August 20, 2003
'1 r: '1". i" 1, .. ~ i. ". ' ....... ' .,:1""'.,. . --<J
Regarding: LUA-01-165. CPA, R, ECF; WSDOT Carr Road CPA #2003-M-1
Dear Sir:
I recently received the notice of application for the WSDOT Property at Carr Road.
strongly suggest that the city turn the Property into a park instead of making it available for
additional housing. The Talbot Road Area is already being intensively developed and park
space is needed for the SUbstantial number of residents already in the area.
I like to be able to go for walks in my neighborhood and have the opportunity to get away
from vehicle traffic and noise. The only opportunities besides the WSDOT Property require
a drive to Soos Creek, Green River or Cedar River. I would like to be able to walk to a park
that provides this kind of environment Without nearby parks residents will not take initiative
to get out of their cars and get some exercise.
I see a park on the WSDOT Property similar to the parks I mentioned above, most similar to
the South end of Soos Creek. This park has a restroom, parking, picnic table(s), a small
amount of play equipment, and that's all. The remainder of the park remains much as it is
today with trails for walking among the trees and enjoying a few moments with nature.
While there are some maintenance costs associate with this type of park, they are
substantially less than if ball fields and other amenities were introduced.
Not only would the residents of this area benefit from the Park but, Valley Medical Center
could expand their fitness programs to use the park facility. The New Horizons school would
also benefit from having a park nearby.
The property being state controlled is a unique opportunity for the City. Turning the property
into a park is not a 'taking of use' of a private land-owner that has held the property for a
long time who now expects to reap a substantial gain on the property.
I strongly suggest the city take advantage of the opportunity to turn this parcel of land into a
park for the numerous residents in the Talbot Ave and'Carr Road area.
Sincerely,
;t;:;i&;;~
Kristi Meyef/
August 17, 2003 AUG 2
, , , City of Renton, EDNSP Dept.
Don Erickson, Project Manager
1055 South Grady Way
., i --,,'----1
Renton WA 98055
Subject: Comments regarding LUA-01-165, CPA, R, ECF; WSDOT Carr Road
CPA #2003-M-1
Dear Mr. Erickson:
I am speaking on behalf of the residents of the Sundance neighborhood located
on South 4i" Street and Smithers Avenue South on Talbot Hill, concerning the
City-sponsored proposal to change the Comprehensive Land Use plan
referenced above. The community of Sundance consists of 18 newer view
homes adjacent to and above the proposed 55-acre rezone. We understand that
the City intends to make the change for positive growth and increased tax based
for the community. We all share a common concern regarding control of that
growth.
As you know, during the past few years, the City of Renton has experienced
unprecedented growth. As a result of streamlining the building permit process to
one of the quickest in the county, Renton has become a very desirable location
for both commercial and residential developers. While the rezoning plan includes
a cross section of residential options that make the plan attractive to developers,
1he:zonlng density options should work to benefit all, including existing residents
6f1heoommuni\y: There needs to be a balance between higher density options
given to developers to maximize profits and the stakeholders such as existing
citizens of the area that need to profit in a civic sense as well.
The plan represents a diverse cross-section of land use, benefiting developers,
however, the zoning density options certainly present a future element of stress
on an already stressed infrastructure. Consider the impact on traffic, schools,
fire, law enforcement, property values and quality of life. We have seen during
the past few years the unfolding of what seems to be unbalanced growth in the
various land use options. lWI!ICity seems to have a propensity for more high-
'density land use rather than single family. One example of this is the
development along Talbot Road west of the proposed rezone area. The
difference in densities between residential and multi-family dwelling represent
exponential increases in stress on infrastructure. For example, when was the last
new school built in the area? The last school bond measure passed in May, was
presented to voters four times before being approved. The bond only addressed
maintenance needs at existing facilities, not new schools.
In order to balance and control growth, we need to consider controlling the
percentage mix of permits granted in each land use and zoning category.
Otherwise, the continuation of the propensity towards high-density will exceed
the concern and financial ability of the City to recover and provide long-term
quality growth.
Of concern to residents of Talbot Hill is the impact of the rezone to existing
wildlife (e.g. deer, coyoites, fox, and birds of prey). 'We.,".\leJYinte[8Stec;Lil1
. partiGipating ir'fthe EnvIronmental Review to understand these among other
issues.
The Sundance neighborhood intends to be an important community player in
making Renton a choice environment in which to live. We may learn from
communities such as Bellevue in realizing that quality of life is a major
consideration in the quest for growth and economic development. We want to
ensure that all possibilities for positive growth are considered. For example, of
the twenty-two parks listed on the City's website, only two are located in
southwest Renton.
~arepresentativ$ of Sundance, I am requesting to serve as a party of record to
'receive further infolmation on the subject proposal. .Additionally, I would like to
formally request any documents relating to the Environmental Review,
Comprehensive Plan Amendment and subsequent meetings I actions regarding
the proposed Land Use and rezone.
Citizens of Renton Sundance Neighborhood
. . •
Attachment to comments for City of Renton LUA-01-165, CPA, R, ECF; WSDOT Carr Road CPA
#2OO3-M-1
--~~---
Debbie S Kevin Burke Steve & Rita Ch es
i{~avarro J~ls~~
~~go,>
Krista & Tim Holmes
...... <t y 0 ;~ ~
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
A Master Application has been filed and accepted with lhe Oevelopment Services Division of the City
of Renton. The following bnefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals.
PROJECT NUMBERINAME:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT LOCATION:
PUBLIC APPROVALS:
APPUCANTIPROJECT
CONTACT PERSotI:
LUA.Ol.165, CPA, R, ECF; WSOOT Carr Road CPA #2003-M-1
ThiS C,ly SpOOSOIOO pI"OpOfIIIlls to mange tha Comprehe!1sive Plan Land u~
Ma~ dasignaj,nn a, wen as the zoning de&ignati0!18 lor portioos 01 II 1: 55-acre
Tha land usa designations would change from ReeidBntlal Rural 10 II combinalk>ll
of Residential RI>ral lRR). Rllsldentllli OptiOO$ (RO), Bnd Residential Single
Family (RSI. Zoning would change from R·l10 II combinaticln 01 R·IO (to dulne/.
aue). R·5 (5 au/nm atnIj. and R-8 (8 dulnet 11=).
The + 55-acre site is loeollli:l$oulh of Carr ROlld'S 179" Street and 81181 of Talbot
RoadSouth
Environmenlal RevieW, Comprahenslye Plan AmendmBl1Iend Rezone
Cil)' of Renton, EDNSP Dept1Don Ericuon, ProJeeI Manager
Commenll; on 1I'Ie abeNe application m~s: be submitted in wrlling to Don Er\ckSOrl, Project Mar\!lger, Stratttgic Planning
Divi$ion, EDNSP Department.l05S South Crady Way, RBIlton, WA 118055, by 11:00 PM on AUllu't 22"", 2003, If you
nave qU8lUons aboot this prDPosal, or Wish 10 be made a party or record and rece~e additional notiflC8tion by mail,
~ntact Don Erickson It (425) 430-6581, Anyone who slbmll! wriHen comments wIII8Utomatlcaily become a party of
record and will be no1~ied of any oeCISLon on this project
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBE.R WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER ALE. IDENTIFICATION
DATE OF APPLICATION:
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION:
DATE OF NOTlC! OF APPLICATION:
Sw LjV~ St, ---------,
)
~/ '" ,,(I
vj ,
December 17, 2001
January 15,2003
August B, 2003
If you would Uko 10 be made B pari)' 01 record to receive further infO!TTl8lion ()I'I \1'1'$ prOjlO8ed projecl. complete \I'Iis form
and return to: City of Reoton, Oevelopmant Planning, 1055 South Grady Way, Romtoo, WA 98055
File NcJName: LUA-OI-18S, CPA, R. ECF: WSDOT CARR ROAD CPAti200J..M-l
NAM' ______________________ _
AOORESS: __________________________________________________________ _
TELEPHONE NO.: __________________________ _
NOTICE OF APf'l"ICATlO1.dDc
CERTIFICATION
"'''''''''' I.~ M~ that -:z... copies of the ", N k''' '-~" --CL--
,:---:l.'-~ .•.. :::~Q II." above document were Post~~dA~~~m~~r~~~~~~!:=-~iLt:~
,?'" ~.~SSIO'" ~l:.7~ "'the described property on . ~-.-~ ~"'. "'" ~ ! :'[] ~OTAI;>L~ ....... ~
:: r",-:' ~
~ • .....~ 00; ~
~ ~:... "'Vaue .: ITTEST: Subscribed ~}ldjwom, before me, a in and for the State of
t
"
.,,.._ .. ~ 1 .... ~fo'ashingtonresidingi(!~·' ,onthe!"'!:::::'----t!..--dayof ~ 'Li'03_
" ~ ".:29-0 ... ',.1' : ·'.~,O"'·WA·S\.o.\~:..-$ II."",,,,,." Lf/Y)~ K~ MARI~ KAMCHEFF
MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRE' ,,_ 0" -
. CITY OF R~.l;UON .... '.
.. /·EgJ:mE!)fif,.p~,H!~~~lY:I~!~l)!.i· ..... ~i'f!.~~'ITPFSER!4.YE·Qf"j~J.;I""~
. .'
On the 6 day of -.... ~~'9-'-. _____ --', 2003, I deposited in the mailso{ the United
States, a sealed envelope contaimng
&Dr3 cbdJist. elvtT
i '
documents. This information was sent to:
Representing
rJ.",. / A. c;..e i.....
(Signature of Sender) _~~~~:..L£=,,-,-,.=--+~,-=.2_·/..,t.·'-' ..... 7====::::-____ _
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) SS
COUNTY OF KING ) A
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that" 1 r ce r t3 t{i.«C« signed this
instrument and acknowledged it to be hislherltheir free and voluntary act for t euses and purposes mentioned
in the instrument.
Dated: ~r!' del-, ~O~
NOTARY.DOC
Dept. of Ecology"
Environmental Review Section
PO Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
WSDOT Northwest Region'
Attn: Ramin Pazooki
King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240
PO Box 330310
Seattle, WA 98133-9710
US Army Corp. of Engineers "
Seattle District Office
Attn: SEPA Reviewer
PO Box C-3755
Seattle, WA 98124
Jamey Taylor
Depart. of Natural Resources
PO Box 47015
OlymQia, WA 98504-7015
KC Dev. & Environmental Servo
Attn: SEPA Section
900 Oakesdale Ave. SW
Renton, WA 98055-1219
Metro Transit
Senior Environmental Planner
Gary Kriedt
201 South Jackson Street
KSC-TR-0431
Seattle, WA 98104-3856
Seattle Public Utilities
Real Estate Services
Eric Swennson
700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900
Seattle, WA 98104-5004
AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING
(ERC DETERMINATIONS)
WDFW -Stewart Reinbold" Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. "
c/o Department of Ecology Attn. SEPA Reviewer
3190 160·h Ave SE 39015 -172nd Avenue SE
Bellevue, WA 98008 Aubum, WA 98092
Duwamish Tribal Office" Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program "
14235 Ambaum Blvd. SW -Front A Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert
Burien, WA 98166 39015 172nd Avenue SE
Aubum, WA 98092-9763
KC Wastewater Treatment Division" Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation"
Environmental Planning Supervisor Attn: Stephanie Kramer
Ms. Shirley Marroquin PO Box 48343
201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-Q50 Olympia, WA 98504-8343
Seattle, WA 98104-3855
City of Newcastle City of Kent
Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP
Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director
13020 SE 72nd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South
Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895
Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila
Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official
Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd.
PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188
Bellevue, WA 98009-0868
Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and
cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. "
Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices he gets his from the web. Only send her
the ERC Determination paperwork.
, .
Last printed 07122103 9:40 AM
,
LIST OF SURROUNDING
PROPERTY OWNERS
WITHIN 300-FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE
City of Renton Development Services Division
1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055
Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231
PROJECT NAME: 'ti5D"T LAu fA . Yo f . Pt-.. ~ t
APPLICATION NO: U.dl 0 I ~ 1(,,5, C fA, ELF, "-
The following is a list of property oIIiners w~hin 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services
Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development.
NAME ADDRESS
. " ','',.
Q:\WEBIPW\DEVSERV\AFORM\aformlistospo.doc06125102
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER
). ~. .. .~
........
(Attach additional sheets, if necessary)
NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER
•. I " .... \,
b'i .... ; •. I ".1'/ ..
. , , " " ' ....
Applicant Certification
I, __ -=C7~~ __ ·!....~!L~IC:::.J..:\2.C":AQ.jdl.~l::!l..O!..-____ --" hereby oertify that the above list(s) of adjaoent property
(print Name)
owners and their addresses were obtained from:
TItle Company Records
.f'King County Assessors Records
~ Date p>/a/03
(AIlpbnt)
S~ned
NOTARY
ATTESTED: Subscribed and swom before me, a Notary Public, in and for the Stale of washington,
residing at on the __ day of , 20 ___ ,
S~nedl ____________________________ __
(NoIaoy Public)
Q:\WEB~RM\aformlistospo.doc
MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES 6-29-07
,
2
smooth Fl!ed 5heets™
312305915208
'JOHN C RADOVICH LLC
2000 124TH AV NE #B103
BELLEVUE W A 98005
885825025004
JAMES KENNETH
24732 142ND AV SE
KENT W A 98042
885825026002
CABONOTPEDRO+ANTHONY
CABONOTAURORA
4200 SMITIIERS A V S #C 203
RENTON WA 98055
855910022000
ANDERSON JAMES T + MINSHULL
CAROL A
402 S 47TH ST #D
RENTONWA 98055
855910028007
AZIZIAKILH
4644 MORRIS A V S
RENTON W A 98055
855910061008
BENNETT DARLA D
4612 MORRIS AV S
RENTON WA 98055
855910072005
BULLOCK DENNIS L
SOl S46TH PL
RENTON WA 98055
855910055000
CA VIT STEPHEN T + ELAINE D
500 S 46TH PL
RENTONWA 98055
947600014007
CHEN JESSICA W+CLARK KIM L
10322 SE 185TH PL
RENTON WA 98055
855910045001
COUMONT FRANK JOHN JR +
COUMONT DELORES
4619 MORRIS AV S
RENTONWA 98055
flAVERY® Address Labels
J •• 305902205
FALK NINA E
POBOX 112
BLACK DIAMOND WA 98010
855910016002
VANDERPOOL JAMES R+GHLEN-EL
28618 181ST AV SE
KENTWA 98042
855910056008
COOK JOHN R
504 S 46TH PL
RENTON W A 98055
855910033007
ANDERSO::-.l STEVEN J + MCCOMBS T
506 S 47TH ST
RENTON WA 98055
885825002003
BALDWIN KATHLEEN F
4200 SMITHERS A V S #A-102
RENTONWA 98055
855910060000
BEVIL HENRY J & AUSTRIA M
520 S 46TH PL
RENTON WA 98055
885825012002
BURCHETT GEOFFREY+SHEILA
3628 SE 19TH CT
RENTONWA 98055
855910071007
CHAMBERLIN BARBARA C
505 S 46TH PL
RENTON WA 98055
855910007001
CHRISTENSON VIRGIL C JR
507 S 47TH ST
RENTONWA 98055
855910058004
DALE RALPH S I ANN M
512 S 46TH PL
RENTONWA 98055
Use template for 5160w
305906206
COVENANT DEVELOPMENT CORP
5101 NFRANCISCOAV
CHICAGO IL 60625
855910052007
CONDRON CONSTRUCTION INC
7205 W KENDRICK A V
NIN MILE FALLS W A 99026
855910050001
ADAMS ELIZABETH A
400 S 46TH PL UNIT A
RENTONWA 98055
885825030004
AUSTIN PETE HAROLD JR
4200 SMITIIERS A V S APT D-I 0 1
RENTON WA 98055
855910012001
BATES STEPHEN W
401 S 47TH ST
RENTON WA 98055
855910070009
BROWN EDWARD 0 + SCHMIDT
CAROLG
509 S 46TH PL
RENTONWA 98055
322305929802
CALAGJU GEORGETA
18414 102ND AV SE
RENTONWA 98055
855910073003
CHAN SIMON SHI MON
420 S 46TH PL #D
RENTONWA 98055
855910004008
CLAY BEVERLY A
515 S 47TH ST#515
RENTON W A 98055
885825033008
DANAO TORIBIO K +EDNA M
4200 SMITHERS AVE S DlO4
RENTON W A 98055
Laser
;,moom reea ;,nee(s ....
855910015004
'DANIELS RICHARD L+ALICE F
4702 MORRIS A V S
RENTON WA 98055
885825034006
FONGQUAY
4200 SMITHERS A V S #D20 I
RENTON WA 98055
885825011004
GANT P AMILA ANNETTE
4200 SMITHERS AVE S A-304
RENTON W A 98055
322305928606
GIBLERPAULJ+LOIS L
18404 102ND A V SE
RENTONWA 98055
855910005005
lWGHT ARLENE
519 S 47TH ST#519
RENTON WA 98055
855910023008
JEFFERSON JACK J
402 E S 47TH ST
RENTON W A 98055
885825027000
KEROESKENNETH
4200 SMITHERS A V S #C301
RENTON WA 98055
855910054003
KUNTZ PAUL A
400 S 46TH PL #F
RENTON W A 98055
855910059002
MAGANA JAMES M
516 S 46TH PL
RENTONWA 98055
855910006003
MCGLASSON WILLIAM E
503 S 47TH ST #ll-F
RENTON WA 98055
8 AVERV® Address Labels
___ 910024006
DOl DEBORAH A
402 S 47TH ST #F
RENTON WA 98055
855910002002
FORD DEIDRE D
527 S 47TH ST
RENTONWA 98055
885825035003
GEE JEFFREY R
4200 SMITHERS A V S #D202
RENTONWA 98055
885825006004
GILES TERESA K
4200 SMITHERS A V S #A202
RENTON WA 98055
855910040002
HALL BABARA].
4635 MORRIS AV S #B
RENTON WA 98055
855910011003
KAMIKA WA JOSEPH A+KEIKO
706 S 32ND PL
RENTON WA 98055
855910057006
KROBER MARVIN S+CHONG S
508 S 46TH PL
RENTON WA 98055
855910053005
LIMBACHER JILL ANN
400 S 46TH PL #C
RENTONWA 98055
947600018008
MCCABE JOHN H+NANCY D
10220 SE 185TH PL
RENTON WA 98055
855910039004
MEIXNER RACHELLE
4635 MORRIS A V S APT A
RENTONWA 98055
Use template tor 5160""
305901900
EDLUNDLLC
15005 SE 171ST ST
RENTON WA 98055
885825007002
FOUNTAIN BARRY B & LYNN F
2420 TALBOT CREST DR S
RENTONWA 98055
885825009008
GEORGE SAMUEL+SUSAMMA A
4200 SMITHERS A V S #A302
RENTON WA 98055
885825018009
GILMARTIN SHARON A
4200 SMITHERS AV S #B 301
RENTON WA 98055
855910010005
HARRIS RHONDA Y
417S47THST#417
RENTON WA 98055
855910019006
KELLOGG LISA A
402 S 47TH ST #A
RENTON W A 98055
855910009007
KUEHNLENZ HEIDI L
413 S 47TH ST #413
RENTONWA 98055
855910076006
LUM JOCELYN C
420 S 46TH PL #G
RENTONWA 98055
855910029005
MCDOWELL MINA R
4640 MORRIS A V S
RENTON WA 98055
855910074001
MORIY ASU SHARON A
420 S 46TH PL #1
RENTON WA 98055
Laser 5160®
S';;ooth leed Sheets™
322305908103
• NEW HORlZON SCHOOL
Illl SCARRRD
RENTONWA 98055
855910034005
PAULSON WILBUR G
510 S 47TH ST
RENTON WA 98055
885825039005
REDIFER ROGER M
4200 SMITHERS AV S #D-302
RENTON WA 98055
855910086005
RlCAN CAROLE A
425 S 46TH PL APT G
RENTON WA 98055
947600011003
SCHEVEDAWN
10334 SE I 85TH PL
RENTONWA 98055
885825032000
SHAW DEANNE R
4200 SMITHERS AV S #D103
RENTON WA 98055
885825003001
SMITH ELLANOR
4200 SMITHERS A V S #A 103
RENTONWA 98055
947600020004
STUTTGEN GLENN J
10208 SE 185TH PL
RENTON W A 98055
885825001005
WELCH HAROLD R+BETTY J
4200 SMITHERS AV S #AIOI
RENTONWA 98055
855910036000
WILLIAMS SANDRA L
4635 MORRlS A V S #1
RENTON WA 98055
SAVERV® Address Labels
0>5910087003
NICHOLSON JUDITH H
425 S 46TH PL APT B
RENTON WA 98055
885825013000
PIERCE CLAUDE J
4200 SMITHERS A V S # B-I02
RENTONWA 98055
947600017000
REEVES MARK T+FRANCINE P
10226 SE I 85TH PL
RENTON WA 98055
885825029006
ROE VIRGINIA D
4200 SMITHERS A V S #C-303
RENTON WA 98055
885825041001
SCHULZE BRIAN
4200 SMITHERS AV S #D-304
RENTON WA 98055
312305909482
SHEGRUD KAREN
4518 TALBOT RD S
RENTON WA 98055
312305910308
SNOW LAWRENCE W DR
17910 TALBOT RD S
RE:sTONWA 98055
855910067005
TAMSlULUN
4620 MORRlS A V S
RENTON WA 98055
885825020005
WEST MARILYN FA YE
4200 SMITHERS A V S #B303
RENTON WA 98055
855910032009
WONG JORDAN L+MA Y P
502 S 47TH ST
RENTON WA 98055
Use template for 5160®
.. 825022001
OGlERSHANNONR
4200 SMITHERS A V S #CI02
RENTON WA 98055
855910079000
QUAM MI-CHONG
420 S 46TH PL #E
RENTONWA 98055
855910042008
REYNA STACIA L
4635 MORRlS A V S #C
RENTON WA 98055
885825004009
ROHRMOSER STEVE J
4200 SMITHERS AV S #A-I04
RENTON W A 98055
855910051009
SHARPE NANCY A
400 S 46TH PL #B
RENTON W A 98055
855910065009
SIMPSON DALE M+DARLENE L
4628 MORRIS A V S
RENTONWA 98055
855910001004
STERN BRUCE G+MICHELLE J
523 S 47TH ST #523
RENTON W A 98055
855910021002
WAHL MICKEY
402-C S 47TH ST
RENTONWA 98055
855910078002
WILKINS EUZABETH L
420 S 46TH PL #B
RENTON WA 98055
85591008800 I
WROLSTAD CAROLE L
425 S 46TH PL #E
RENTON W A 98055
Laser
;:,moom r\!ea ;:,neets' •.
855910084000
'YUENMAYM
1606 DAYTON AVNE
RENTONWA 98056
885825014008
BENTLEY TYRONE D
4200 SMITHERS A V S #B 103
RENTON WA 98055
855910027009
CHINDIANEW
402 S 47TH ST #1
RENTONWA 98055
947600013009
COOPER KEITH+KEITH
10326 185TH PL
RENTONWA 98055
855910020004
DEERING GEORGE C+DEERING
SHIRLEYE
402 S 47TH ST #B
RENTONWA 98055
885825036001
FUNK SHARON K
4200 SMITHERS A V S 0203
RENTONWA 98055
855920017008
GRADY MICHAEL W+SHIRIN
730 S 47TH ST
RENTONWA 98055
855910044004
HIGGINS THOMAS P
4615 MORRIS AV S
RENTON W A 98055
885825019007
JONES MATTHEW ALAN
4200 SMITHERS A V S #B302
RENTONWA 98055
855910038006
LINLAR1NAH
4635 MORRIS AV S UNIT #G
RENTONWA 98055
flAVERY® Address Labels
u""9IOO14007
ABELES JILL L
409 S 47TH ST
RENTON W A 98055
885825038007
CANTOR ALOYSIUS 0
4200 SMITHERS A V S #D301
RENTON WA 98055
947600012001
CHO MAN CHANG
10330 185TH PL SE
RENTON WA 98055
855910013009
CORDERO CAMERON+JOANNE
405 S 47TH ST UNIT 405
RENTONWA 98055
855920012009
EDWARD WOLFE R
700 S 47TH ST
RENTONWA 98055
855910083002
GATES KEIKO E
425 S 46TH PL #1
RENTON WA 98055
855920009005
HANSON ERIC
4711 SMITHERS A V S
RENTON W A 98055
855920007009
HOLMES TIMOTHY A+KRlSTA M
739 S47TH ST
RENTON WA 98055
855910041000
K1NDERMANN MARY PATRICIA
4635 MORRIS A V S #E
RENTON WA 98055
855910068003
LYONS DONALD J
4616 MORRIS A V S
RENTONWA 98055
Use template tor 5160'"
825031002
BALDWIN CORIE A
4200 SMITHERS A V S #D1 02
RENTONWA 98055
855920003008
CHARLES STEVEN G+RIT A M
723 S 47THST
RENTONWA 98055
855920004006
CLAEYS JIM+SUSAN
4708 SMITHERS AV S
RENTON WA 98055
855910081006
DAGONESE JOSEPH C
420 S 46TH PL UNIT #F
RENTONWA 98055
855910037008
FELLER RENDA S
4635 MORRIS AV S #H
RENTONWA 98055
855910077004
GILLISSE ADA E
420 S 46TH PL #A
RENTONWA 98055
855920014005
HAYES ROBERT B JR+SARAH
712 S 47TH ST
RENTON WA 98055
855910018008
JOHNSON ELEANOR L
4714 MORRIS A V S
RENTONWA 98055
322305908608
LECCLECH MAURICE J
12227 SE 1 79TH PL
RENTON W A 98055
855920015002
MACDONALD DOUGLAS M
718 S 47TH ST
RENTON W A 98055
Laser
• .;;IImUUUI .... ccu ~IICCL~""
855920(}l6000
. MANGLA SANDEEP+PREETl SINGLA
724 S 47THST
RENTON WA 98055
855910025003
MCKINNEY FRED R
402 S 47TH ST G
RENTONWA 98055
855910008009
MILOVIC ZORAN
511 S 47TH ST
RENTON W A 98055
885825017001
NGUYENPHUOCHONG
4200 SMITHERS A V S +B203
RENTONWA 98055
855910063004
NIEVAJAVIER
4604 MORRIS AVES
RENTON WA 98055
885825028008
PHOUTHA VONG KONG+SOUAY
4200 SMITHERS A V S #C302
RENTONWA 98055
885825016003
ROBINSON MICHAEL R
4200 SMITHERS A V S #B202
RENTON W A 98055
947600015004
SINGHAVTAR
10310 SE 1 85TH PL
RENTON WA 98055
885825008000
STEARN THERESA
4200 SMITHERS A V S A204
RENTON WA 98055
855920005003
SYKES JODIE M+KENNETH W
4714 SMITHERS AV S
RENTONWA 98055
flAVERV® Address Labels
"""910075008
MASCISAMYM
420 S 46TH PL #H
RENTON WA 98055
855910003000
MCLAIN JAMES RONALD
531 S 47TH ST
RENTONWA 98055
855920002000
NAVARRO JAIME+JOYCE
729 S47TH ST
RENTONWA 98055
855910090007
NGUYEN TUAN A
425 S 46TH PL #F
RENTONWA 98055
855910043006
OSBORN NANCY G
4635 MORRIS A V S #F
RENTONWA 98055
855910089009
PORTER REBECCA E
425 S 46TH PL C
RENTON W A 98055
885825005006
SAN MARTIN OSMAN E
4200 SMITHERS A V S #A20 1
RENTONWA 98055
855920001002
SPERBER JOHN LEE+KARLA
JOANNE
735 S 47TH ST
RENTONWA 98055
855920010003
STRUYK WILLIAM E+STEPHANIE A
KENDALL
4707 SMITHERS A V S
RENTON WA 98055
855910062006
THORNTON-SMITH STEPHAN! A
4608 MORRISAVS
RENTONWA 98055
use templille ror :)JOU-
910035002
MAY JENELLE V
4635 MORRIS A V S #D
RENTON WA 98055
855910031001
MEYER KRISTI L+SUTTON GLEN L
4632 MORRIS A V S #4632
RENTON WA 98055
947600019006
NGUYEN MICHAEL+NlEVES
HIDROSOLLO
10214 SE 185TH PL
RENTONWA 98055
855910049003
NIENAU CANDICE R
400 S 46TH PL
RENTONWA 98055
855910064002
OSTERMAN ERIC F+MARGARET
SOSTERMAN ERIC F
4600 MORRIS A V S
RENTON WA 98055
885825010006
QUACH KENNETH
4200 SMITHERS A V S #A303
RENTONWA 98055
855910017000
SCOTT MARISSA D
4710 MORRIS AV S
RENTONWA 98055
855910082004
STARKS ROBIN
425 S 46TH PL #D
RENTONWA 98055
855910047007
SULLIVAN BARRY J
400 S 46TH PL #1
RENTONWA 98055
947600016002
VOONG TAT KHAY
10232 SE 185TH PL
RENTONWA 98055
LaSer
85591,0085007
. WILEY THELMA L
425 S 46TH PL #A
RENTONWA 98055
855920018006
YUXINYAN
736 S 47TII ST
RENTON W A 98055
855910()48oo5
BAUTISTA JUANITAB
6727 RAINIER A V S #220
SEATTLE WA 98118
947600021002
KING COUNTY
500 KC ADMIN BLDG
5004TIIAV
SEATTLE WA 981()4
312305915901
PACIFIC HOSPITALPRESERVATI +
PHILIP SHERBURNE
1200 12TII AV S
SEATTLE WA 98144
885825040003
HERRMANN DONALD
5129 GREEN HILLS AV #A
TACOMA WA 98422
855910030003
LEE BESS PEl-PEl
#3002031 W 41ST AVE
VANCOUVER BC CN V6YIB4
gAVERY® Address Labels
825023009
WOODY MICHAEL D
4200 SMITHERS AV S C-103
RENTON WA 98055
855920013007
ROGERS TAMMARRIAN S
706 S 47TH ST
RENTON WA 98055
855920011001
CODER MATTHEW L + ANAYA
JOSIAHL
POBOX 81092
SEATTLE WA 98108
312305911108
LYNN ELIZABETH TRUST
C/O ISH PROPERTIES
14900 INTERURBAN AV S #210
SEATTLE WA 98168
855910()46009
PICKART TERRY M+KATHLEEN A
2846 SW 1l1TH PL
SEATTLE WA 98146
855910066007
LEE & ZHOU COMPANY LTD
6750 S 180TII ST
TUKWILA WA 98188
855910069001
WONG EDMUND
13726 184TH A V NE
WOODINVILLE W A 98072
u:»1t:' Lt:lIIl1ldU:: lUI :J.1DU-
)10080008
WURUTII
401 47TII ST #420C
RENTON W A 98055
855910026001
DITTBERNER SCOTT G+MARIA L
POBOX 1207
RICHLAND W A 99352
322305907006
K C HOUSING AUTHORITY ADMIN
600 ANDOVER PARK W
SEATTLE WA 98188
885825015005
MORGAN JESSICA G
4200 SMITIIERS A V S #B-20 1
SEATTLE WA 98055
855920008007
SPECIALIZED HOMES
3001 E YESLER WY
SEATTLE WA 98122
312305904806
SCHNEIDER HOMES I LLC
6510 SOUTHCENTER BL STE 1
TUKWILA WA 98188
Laser
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City
of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals.
PROJECT NUMBER/NAME:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT LOCATION:
PUBLIC APPROVALS:
APPLICANT/PROJECT
CONTACT PERSON:
LUA·01·165, CPA, R, ECF; WSDOT Carr Road CPA #2003·M·1
This City sponsored proposal is to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use
Map designation as well as the zoning designations for portions of a :!: 55·acre.
The land use designations would change from Residential Rural to a combination
of Residential Rural (RR). Residential Options (RO). and Residential Single
Family (RS). Zoning would change from R-1 to a combination of R-10 (10 du/net
acre), R-S (5 du/net acre). and R-8 (8 du/net acre).
The.:!: 55-acre site is located south of Carr Road/S 179"" Street and east of Talbot
Road South.
Environmental Review, Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone
City of Renton, EDNSP Oept.lDon Erickson, Project Manager
Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Don Erickson, Project Manager. Strategic Planning
Oiv;s;on. EONSP Departrnen~ 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on August 22"", 2003. If you
have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,
contact Don Erickson at (425) 430~6581, Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of
record and will be notified of any decision on this project,
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION
DATE OF APPLICATION:
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION:
DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION:
December 17, 2001
January 15, 2003
August 8, 2003
lcl:\'~~i_+h~"'L .
'.---;--:r:'~:'::'~~~_1 ~ ; .;1:-'i --,:
-';: .. J:J'!;I-: ,:1 :Ct..-;-~ ·,-t:"wo,' ~i',. fC
;'71 i--;:-:" :i;_~'1.;r--~,-:"
If you would like to be made a party of record to receive furd'ler information on this proposed project. complete this fonn
and retum to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055.
File No.lName; LUA-Ol·165, CPA, R, ECF; WSDOT CARR ROAD CPA#2003·M·1
NAME: HeaM.r ;;;:J,I:)}I2Jy .'
ADDRESS IjVl/I1IitYi f ;:lJ/£ 5c1. der2t?p)'
TELEPHONE NO.: If'£' i ;db ~ 61/);k
t..Mc.eJ"/J,J' (J.j"e Wd-f;.CY' ira/)1etS£;--.
NOTICE OF APPLICA n01.doc
Project Proposals Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2003
City Initiated
Application 2003-M-Ol (LUA-Ol-165) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendment
Washington State Department of Transportation, 55 acres located at South Talbot Road
and South 43" Street. Residential Rural to Residential Single Family, Residential Plaooed
Neighborhood or Residential Options, and Employment Area Office.
This amendment requests consideration of a change in land use designation from Residential
Rural (R-l zoning) to a combination of Employment Area-Office (CO zoning), Residential
Single Family (R-8 zoning) and Residential Options or Residential Planned Neighborhood (R-
10 or R-14 zoning) to promote redevelopment ofthis area and diversification of the tax-base.
The property owner requests clustering future development sites in three zones based on
topography. The review process will consider whether an increase in residential capacity for
detached and attached homes and additional office capacity implements the overall objectives of
the Comprehensive Plan and City Council Business Plan Goals.
Application 2003-M-02 (LUA-Ol-167) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendment
King County Department of Health, 5 acres located at SE 3"/4th St., Employment Area-
Industrial to Employment Area Commercial or Center Suburban.
This amendment is a request to evaluate the redevelopment potential of this site as a mixed-use
designation allowing a combination of residential and office/medical clinic uses. The review
process will consider whether an increase in residential capacity is appropriate at this location.
The office and medical clinic uses are already allowed under existing Industrial land use
policies and IL zoning.
Application 2003-M-03 (LUA-Ol-l66) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendment,
20,625 square feet of right of way between the eastern edge of the 1-405 corridor on the
west and Cedar River trail on the east. Owned by Washington State Department of
Transportation, Center-Office Residential to Resource Conservation.
This amendment is a technical correction to the Land Use map rectifying the designation of this
remnant parcel.
Application 2003-M-04 (LUA-Ol-168) City of Renton, Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map
Amendment to review the Single Family Designation for 2,592 acres within the East
Renton Plateau Potential Auoexation Area. Residential Single Family to Residential
Rural.
This application will consider whether the overall Comprehensive Plan Vision, Land Use
Element and Housing Element policies are better implemented by the Residential Rural
Designation with potential RC, R-l or R-S zoning or by the Residential Single Family
Designation with potential R - 5 or R -8 zoning. This review will focus on the land capacity, lot
size, housing types and other development standards implementing the R-5 zone compared with
the R-8 zone in the City of Renton, and on the type of development allowed in the
corresponding King County R-4 or R-6 zoning. The review will also consider transportation
and road capacity issues within this corridor.
H:\EDNSP\Comp PJan\AmendmenlS\GMA Update\Map\Projed Proposals Sunnnary3.doc
Application 2003-M-6 (LUA-Ol-l63) City of Renton, Amendment to Comprehensive Plan
Map to adjust parcel boundary between Liberty Ridge and Aegis Properties Residential
Planned Neighborhood, with R-IO Zoning to Employment Area Industrial with IL zoning.
This small piece of land fronts on NE 3"'. It is currently part of the Liberty Ridge property.
The property owners are proposing a lot line adjustment to consolidate the small wedge with the
Aegis property. The owner of the Aegis property is purchasing this "miss ing piece" to create
full frontage. The proposal is to change the land use designation of the wedge to be consistent
with the Employment Area Industrial designation already on the Aegis property.
Application 2003-M-8 (LUA-Ol-l64) City of Renton, Merlino Map Amendment request to
amend Land Use Designation from Residential Multifamily Infill to Residential Options
and amend the existing Development Agreement to reduce density on the site.
The proposal is to change the Comprehensive Plan land use designation for 25.68 acres from
RM-I to RO as well as amend Section 3 of the September 2000 Development Agreement
between the City of Renton and the owners, SR 900 LLC. The site is located along the south
side of SR-900 about 950 feet east of its intersection with 68'" Avenue South.
H:\EDNSPIComp PlanlAmendmenlSlGMA UpdatelMaplProject Pmposals SURUnaty3.doc 2
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City
of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals.
PROJECT NUMBER/NAME:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT LOCATION:
PUBLIC APPROVALS:
APPLICANT/PROJECT
CONTACT PERSON:
LUA-01-165. CPA, R, ECF; WSDOT Carr Road CPA #2003-M-1
This City sponsored proposal is to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use
Map designation as well as the zoning designations for portions of a .:!: 55-acre.
The land use designations would change from Residential Rural to a combination
of Residential Rural (RR), Residential Options (RO). and Residential Single
Family (RS). Zoning would change from R-1 to a combination of R-10 (10 du/net
acre). R-5 (5 du/net acre). and R-B (8 du/net acre).
The ± 55-acre site Is located south of Carr Road/S 179111 Street and east of Talbot
Road South.
Environmental Review, Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone
City of Renton. EDNSP Dept/Don Erickson. Project Manager
Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Don Erickson. Project Manager, Strategic Planning
Division, EDNSP Department. 1055 South Grady Way. Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on August 22"", 2003. If you
have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail.
contact Don Erickson at (425) 430.&581. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of
record and will be notified of any decision on this project.
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION
DATE OF APPLICATION:
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION:
DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION:
December 17, 2001
January 15, 2003
August8,2003
·"·CT. ' ~l \ .' ~_
,
ill
-'\,
"!i
<;t
t,
00
o·
If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed proJect, complete this form
and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055.
File No.lName: LUA-01-165. CPA, R. ECF; WSDOT CARR ROAD CPA#2003-M-1
NAME: __________________________________________________________ __
ADDRESS: ____________________________________________________________ __
TELEPHONE NO.: __________________________ __
NOTICE OF APPUCA TI01.doc
~~ CITY OF RENTON
PlanningIBuildi >ublicWorks Department
Jesse Tanner. Mayor Gregg Zhnmerman P.E., Administrator
August 8, 2003
WSDOT
C/o Patrick Fomash
PO Box 47338
Olympia, WA 98504-7338
Subject: WSDOT Carr Rd, Compo Plan Amendment
LUA-01-165,CPA,ECF,R
Dear Mr, Formash:
The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the
subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and. therefore. is
accepted for review,
It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on
August 26, 2003. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is
required to continue processing your application,
Please contact me, at (425) 430-6581. if you have any questions,
Don Erickson
Senior Planner
-----.
------l:-:O-:-SS:-s:-o-u-:"th-=G:-ra-d:-y-W-a-y--R-e-nt-o-n,-w-a-sh-;n-gt-o-n-9-g0-S-S------R E N T ~ * This paper oontai.,s 50% rcc'(cled malerial, 30% post conaumer AHE.AD OF TNR CUR-VE
•
City of Renton
LAND USE PERMIT
MASTER APPLICATION
PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION
PV;;;r{l;;;p;;d ~~
ADDRESS:;:;O.jft,% 4 '} 33B
ZIP7f£¥'~ J336
PROJW/~R~SWjJ:8~}(
TElEPHONE NUMBER: ~-'/06-73'Y2
APPLICANT (if other than owner)
KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S):
7dd!o9flf3
EXI~G ~(S)/_ /c!ltJTc (t :;;>ariPt '" Cl f(NiI J);.
PJ)Z0~5D ~D ~(S): ~jj 1/
f/~> A' ',M, 21 ~
EXISTING COMPREtiNSI~l./' ~~IGNATION: ~R -!fest&' n
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PlAN MAP DESIGNATION
(If applicable): K 0) RS.J a;tI ~
TELEPHONE NUMBER o G -43LJ -6q;~ EXISTING ZONING: R-I
CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (If applicable): R-ItJ; ,e ~1?-5 f £; j
SITEAREA (insquarefeet):.t?J 31'5,-&t'l3
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED
FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING
THREE LOTS OR MORE (If;:r~
;fJ //; -/jJ0J1-prO j t 'J;J
r'ROPOSED RESIDENT~L DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET
ACRE (of applicable):
NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (If applicable):
TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS:
AJlk
-fas ---f30-C35tl ~~R OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable):
Q:lWEBIPWlDEVSERVlAFORMlafonnmastorapp.doc06I25102
)JECT INFORMATION (con .... ued)
N~ OF EXISTING OWEWNG UNITS (if applicable):
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (If applicable):
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if appIcabIe):
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (If applicable):
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIOENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (If applicable):
NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIOENTIAL BUILDINGS (If
applicable):
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE
NEW PROJECT (If applicable):
PROJECT VALUE: fon ~ LJy,~,.,1IJ
IS THE SITE LOCATED IN NN TYPE OF
ENVlRONMENTALL Y CRITICAL AREA. PLEASE INCLUDE
SQUARE FOOTAGE (If applicable):
1J AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE
1J AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO
1J FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. II.
1J GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. II.
1J HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. II.
1J SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. It
1J WETLANDS sq. ft.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
(Attach /egal description on separate sheet with the following Infonnation Included)
SITUATE IN THE QUARTER OF SECTION --' TOWNSHIP --' RANGE--, IN THE CITY
OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES
List all land use applications being applied for:
1. 3.
2. 4.
Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
I. (Print NameIs) , dec:lare that 1 am (please check one) _!he current owner of !he property
Involved In this appfocalion or __ !he authorized representaIive to act for a corporation (please aIIach ptOOf of authorizalion) and that !he foregoing
statemenb and answers herein contained and the InIonnation herewith are in al respeds true and correct to !he best of my knowledge and belief.
(Signature of OWnerIRepresentative)
(Signature of OWnerIRepresentative)
Q:\WEB\PWlDEVSERVlAFORM\afunnmasteta.do<:06I2SI02
1 certify lhaIl"'-or h ..... satisfactory evidence that==;:::-===~=
signed this Instrument and acknowled9od • to be hIsn1erIIhelr free and voluntary act for !he
uses and purposes mentioned In the Instrument.
NoIaJy PublIc In and for !he state of Washington
Notary (Prtnl) __________ _
My appolntmentexpires: _______ _
APPLICATION 2003-M-Ol LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT (LUA 01-165, R, ECF)
TO CHANGE DESIGNATION FOR PORTIONS OF SITE FROM RESIDENTIAL RURAL
TO A COMBINATION OF RESIDENTIAL RURAL, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, AND
CENTER INSTITUTION. TO CHANGE ZONING FOR PORTIONS OF SITE FROM
RESIDENTIAL - 1 DUlAC TO RESIDENTIAL - 8 DUlAC, RESIDENTIAL -10 DUlAC, AND
COMMERCIAL OFFICE
OWNER: Washington Department of Transportation
APPLICANT: Washington Department of Transportation
DESCRIPTION
The applicant's proposal is to change the Comprehensive Plan land use designation for portions of a ±
55-acre site from Residential Rural to a combination of Residential Rural (RR), Residential Single
Family (RS), Residential Options (RO), and Center Institution (Cn. The site is located south of Carr
RoadlS 1 79th Street and east of Talbot Road South.
ISSUE SUMMARY
I. Whether overall the property has development potential that should be recognized through
redesignation to a higher-intensity land use allowing commercial or residential activity or, whether
the property should remain in RR as part of an urban separator with low-density, single-family
land use.
2. If it is determined that RR is no longer appropriate for this site, which of several options are
appropriate?
Area A
Are proposed office uses appropriate for this area given the present market for office in the
City and the City Council's adopted strategy for the location of office development?
AreaB
Is the RO land use designation and R-l 0 zoning appropriate for this area given its geographic
isolation and access constraints? Because of this area's limited accessibility, would the RR
land use designation and R-5 zoning be more appropriate?
AreaC
Whether the RS land use designation and R-8 zoning is a good fit for this area given R-8
zoning to the south in the City and R-l and R-6 zoning to the south in King County?
AreaD
Whether the interior of the parcel as defined by ravines and stream courses should remain in
the RR designation with R-I zoning?
RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
Support re-designation of this site to a more intensive land use since the site's prior use for gravel
excavation has been discontinued and the property has multiple areas that are adequate for
redevelopment. Specifically, staff is recommending the following:
Map Amendment #2003-M-OI
Page 2
Staff Recommendation
8/6/2003
a. Area A. Change the RR designation and R-I zoning in the northwest comer of the site to RO
with concWTent R-IO zoning, rather than Commercial Office (CO) as requested by the applicant.
b. Area B. Change the RR designation and R-I zoning in the southern portion of the site to RS
with concurrent R-8 zoning; consistent with the applicant's request for this area;
c. Area C. Retain the RR designation in the northeast comer of the site but change the
implementing zoning from R-I to R-5, rather than R-IO as requested by the applicant, and
d. Area D. Retain the RR designation with R-I zoning over those portions of the site that are most
environmentally sensitive (steep slopes, Panther Creek, etc.); also consistent with the applicant's
request.
BACKGROUND
The subject site is a former quarry that is characterized by trees, ravines, shrubs and secondary growth.
Panther Creek runs from the southeast comer of the site diagonally to the north approximately midway
between the east and west property lines. Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOn
mined gravel at the site and used it for road construction and maintenance for many years. This use of
the property has been exhausted and the agency plans to surplus the site as one parcel. WSDOT is
looking for the highest and best use of the property for future redevelopment, and has identified office
and residential development for potential re-use of the site. At this point there is no specific
redevelopment project proposed. Figure I shows the location of the site south of Carr Road/South
179'" Street, and east of Talbot Road South.
Site Characteristics
Steep slopes and ravines running through the middle of the site physically constrain access and the
development potential of the area as shown on Figures 2,3, and 4. These critical areas also divide the
site into four separate parts.
• Area "A" is 13.88 acres in size and is considered to have 7.43 net developable acres. It is
sWTounded on 75% of its perimeter by steep slopes and critical areas.
• Area "B" on the south of the site is 8.14 acres in size and is considered to have a net
developable area of 4.70 acres. It abuts R-8 zoning in Renton and R-6 zoning in King County.
Approximately 60"10 of its perimeter is defmed by steep slopes and critical areas.
• Area "C" is 8.37 acres in size and is considered to have 5.41 net developable acres.
Approximately 40% of its perimeter is defmed by steep slopes and critical areas.
• Area "D", the largest area of the 55-acre site consists of approximately 24.6 acres the majority
of which ·are defined as steep slopes, ravines and waterway. This area includes a portion of
Panther Creek and connects to the existing open space/urban separator south of the southwest
comer of the site.
Existing Land Use and Zoning
The 55-acre site is currently designated RR on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and is zoned
R-I as shown on Figure 5. The RR land use designation was initially applied to the entire site since it
allowed mineral extraction and, at the time of the 1995 Comprehensive Plan review, the site was used
for quarrying. Mineral/natural resource recovery is an allowed use in the R-I zone. The purpose of
this designation is to preserve open space and natural resources and to protect environmentally
sensitive areas by limiting residential development in critical areas, and areas identified as part of a
citywide or regional open space network.
2002·M'()1 CaIT Rd.docl 2 8/6103
Map Amendment #2003-M-OI
Page 3
SurroWlding Area Land Use
Staff Recommendation
8/612003
Properties to the north and west of Area "A" currently have the Center Institution (Cl) and the
Residential Multi-family Infill (RM-l) land use designations. They are zoned CO and RM-I as shown
on Figure 5. An existing medical office building fronting on Carr Road and accessed from Smithers
Avenue South exists to the north of Area "A". There also is an existing multi-family complex to the
north also accessed from Smithers Avenue South.
The portion of the site identified as Area "B" abuts a Residential Single Family (RS) designation in
the City and a GreenbeltlUrban Separator and Urban Residential 4-12 dulac designation in King
COWlty.' Properties to the north of Area "C" have RS and RR designations and are zoned R-8 and R-
1. The properties to the east of Area "C" in King COWlty have the COWlty'S Urban Residential 4-12
dulac designation. The R-l zoned properties to the west and south of the site are currently considered
to be part of an open space/urban separator network identified by both Renton and King COWlty.
ANALYSIS
Redesignation to a Higher Intensitv Land Use
The applicant's request for the area, shown on Figure 6, is CI with CO zoning for Area A, RS with R-
8 zoning for Area B, and RO with R-IO zoning for Area C. Area D would remain RR designation
with R-I zoning. An alternative staff proposal for this area is shown in Figure 7.
With the site no longer used for mineral extraction it seems appropriate to evaluate its development
potential in light of adjacent uses, accessibility, critical areas, and economic trends in the area. With
more than 26.24 acres of the site free of critical areas, relatively level and accessible, it seems
reasonable to seek a higher and better use for these areas. This is especially true given the site's
proximity to SR-167 and 1-405, Valley Medical Center, Southcenter, and Sea-Tac Airport. Although
currently part of an open-space network, the entire site does need not be retained in RR to maintain an
open-space corridor in this area. Retaining R -I zoning on a portion of the site heavily constrained by
critical areas (Area D) still provides a connection to the RR designation to the south.
Area "A"
The applicant has requested that Area "A" be designated CI in order to rezone the property to CO.
They believe that there may be a need for additional medical institutional uses in the area and note that
this area abuts areas zoned CO to the west and north. Staff does not support expanding the existing
Center Institution designation since there already is an abWldance of CO zoned property in the area.
Valley Medical Center has not yet reached build-out. There is no indication based upon the Valley
Medical Center's November 1991 Master Plan that they intend to expand eastward along Carr Road.
Also, there are no known post-secondary educational or health-care facilities that have expressed an
interest in expanding in this area. In addition, there is an adequate supply of CO-zoned land in the
Valley. Redesignation of Area "A" to CO would create an additional 13.8-acre area estimated to have
the capacity to accommodate 707 new employees.
The Center Institution policies set forth mapping criteria for redesignation of property. The site
location does not comply with the criteria (see Policy LU-138).
, The City is in discussions with King County to change this designation to Urban Residential 4-12 duJac since
much of the area to the west and accessed from 102,d Avenue SE aheady is at 3 duJac or greater densities.
2002-M-j)j Carr Rrl.doc\ 3 &16103
Map Amendment #2003-M-Ol
Page 4
Staff Recommendation
8/6/2003
Policy LU-138. Center Institution should be located:
a. contiguous to an existing or planned transit route;
b. in close proximity to commercial uses and major employment areas;
c. in areas with immediate access to an Interstate or a State route and in areas at the
intersection of two principal arterials; and
d. with vehicular access to the site from a principal arterial street with the number of
access points minimized but designed to ease entrance and exit.
The site is set back approximately 300' from Carr Road and is not contiguous to transit or a principal
arterial street. Given the site's relative isolation staff does not believe it would be a good location to
provide post-secondary education and/or health-care needs facilities.
Staff believes Area "A" would, however, lend itself to the RO land use designation, which is
encouraged in areas bordering Centers. Policy LU-16.1 encourages a mix of residential use types
including single family and small-scale. multi-family housing types designed to look like singte-
family development with ground-related entries in areas bordering Center designations.
PoHcy LU-16.1. In areas bordering Center designations and in areas with an existing
mix of residential use types encourage a mix of single family and small scale multi-family
housing types designed to look like single family development with ground related entries,
i.e. duplex, triplex,fourplex.
The objective of this designation is to create new planned residential neighborhoods in areas mapped
as RO which include a variety of unit types designed to incorporate features from both single-family
and multi-family developments. Policy LV-50, below, establishes mapping criteria for the RO
designation.
Policy LU-SO. Residential neighborhoods may be considered for the Residential Options
Designation if they meet three of the following criteria:
a. The area already has a mix of small-scale multi-family units or had long-standing
duplex or low-density multi-family zoning.
b. Development patterns are established.
c. Vacant lots exist or parcels have redevelopment potential.
d. Few new roads or major utility upgrades will be needed with foture development.
e. The site is located adjacent to a Center designation.
This 13.88 acre vacant site has redevelopment potential, is located next to a Center designation, and
would require few new roads or major utility upgrades to serve it. Staff supports the RO land use
designation with R-l 0 zoning for this area.
Area "B"
The applicant has proposed designating Area "8" RS. The designation is consistent with existing
single-family residential development to the south, both in the City and in the county along the west
side of 102nd Avenue SE and the east side of 102nd Avenue SE. Staff also notes that the RS
designation is supported here by the following two land use policies.
Policy LU-l6. In established single-family neighborhoods and new low-density areas,
encourage single family housing types.
2002-M-Ol Carr Rd.docl 4 8/6103
Map Amendment #2003-M-OI
Page S
Staff Recommendation
8/6/2003
Policy LV-40.1. Site features such as distinctive stands of trees and natural slopes should be
retained to enhance neighborhood character and preserve property values where possible.
Policy LU-16 supports establishing single-family housing types in low-density areas such as this.
With the abutting R-I zoned area (Area "D") distinctive stands of trees and natural slopes would be
retained, which should help enhance a future single-farrrily neighborhood here (Policy LU-40.2).
An additional alternative is to consider the RR comprehensive plan designation with R-S zoning for
this portion of the site. The lower density would provide an opportunity for larger-lot development
and implement additional Housing Element objectives. Policy H-32 states, "Provide opportunities for
larger-and medium-lot single-family development." Policy H-33 states "Utilize low-density single-
family areas and Resource Conservation designations to provide opportunities for low density
development. "
Much of the subject site is considered to be a low-density area because of its environmental
sensitivity. As it abuts existing single family to the south, the R-S alternative could be a good
transition density at this location. Also, there may be a greater opportunity to retain unique site
features such as trees, natural slopes, etc. with the R-S zoning designation.
There is policy support for either S dulacre or 8 dulacre implementing zoning at this location. Five-
dulac zoning supports a desire for large lots, higher-income housing types, and a better transition to
sensitive areas. R-8 zoning supports increasing the amount of single-family housing available in the
City. Staff supports the applicant's request for R-8 density in Area B in order to increase single-
family development opportunities and implement a SO/SO balance between single-family and multi-
family unit types. However, if the Planning Commission and City Council support the larger-lot
zoning alternative, there is sufficient policy direction to support that option as well.
Area "C"
The applicants indicated a preference for RO on this 8.37 acre area in their initial application, noting
that the area to the east, in King COIlllty, was similarly designated with the County's Urban Residential
4-12 dulac land use designation. However, the area in King County is developed with a large
manufactured home park and has direct access off SR-SIS (108"' Avenue SE). Area "C" is a much
smaller area and is accessed off of a limited access, dead-end street (Mill Avenue SE). Staff also notes
that at least 40% of the perimeter of Area "C" abuts steeply sloped ravines and Panther Creek. Staff
suggests that this area retain its RR land use designation but that it be rezoned from R-l (I dulnet acre)
to R-S zoning (S-dulnet acre). This would be consistent with the following RO objective.
Objective LV-I: Preserve open space and natural resources and protect environmentally
sensitive areas by limiting residential development in critical areas. areas identified as part of
a city-wide or regional open space network. or agricultural lands within the City.
Area "D"
Both the applicant and staff are in agreement that this 24.61-acre portion of the 55-acre site should
retain its current RR land use designation and R-I zoning. Objective LU-I addresses protecting such
environmentally sensitive areas by limiting residential development within them. This designation
would also allow this environmentally sensitive area to function as part of the open space corridor it
connects to in the southeast corner of the 5S-acre site.
2002-M-O) Carr Rd.docl 5 8/6103
Map Amendment #2003-M-O I
Page 6
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPLIANCE:
Staff Recommendation
8/612003
The redesignation of the property from RR to higher-intensity designations that provide increased
opportunities for residential development complies with the overall vision and land use strategy of the
City for residential uses.
Policy LUll provides that "future residential growth should be accommodated through development
of new neighborhoods in environmentally suitable vacant land on the hills and plateaus surrounding
downtown". Policy LU 16.1 provides that a "mix of single family and small-scale, multi-family
housing types designed to look like single-family development with ground-related entries" should be
provided in areas bordering Center designations and in areas with a mix of residential use types.
Each of the proposed areas complies with the pertinent mapping requirements and policy objectives of
the land use designations as described in the analysis section of this report.
CAPACITY ANALYSIS
MODELED THEORETICAL
CAPACITY
.
ExlstingR~ Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed j()w~ifi'
lZOnblg R-I0 R-S R-S R-l ;'JI(e,w
(± SSacres) Zoning Zoning Zoning Zoning besig!!atIQns
(13.88 (8.14 (8.37 (24.61
Gross acres) acres) acres) acres) Areas "A",
Areas "A", "B", "C",
"B"", "C", Area "A" Area "B" Area "COO Area "D" and-"D"
and "D"
Net Acreage 26.24 7.43 4.70 S.41 8.7 26.24
Maximum 1 dulnet 13 dulnet 8 dulnet S dulnet 1 dulnet
Density acre acre acre acre acre
Estimated 26 units 96 units 37 units 27 units 9 units tb~hlis
Number of (R-8)
Units based . (125wjt~Q.-.
on Buildable 21 units rS9~AreaD)
Lands (RS)
.', .
From the above table it can be seen that the staff proposal would result in an increase of approximately
109 units on the subject site. The existing theoretical capacity of 26 units would increase to 135
theoretical units.
ZONING CONCURRENCY
New zoning would have to be put in place for these proposed new land use designations. To
implement the RR designation both the R-l and the R-5 zoning is proposed. To implement the RS
designation concurrent R-8 zoning is proposed. And, to implement the RO land use designation R-IO
zoning is proposed.
2002-M-Ol Carr Rd.doc\ 6 8/6/03
Map Amendment #2003-M-Ol
Page 7
Staff Recommendation
8/6/2003
Review Criteria for Rewnes Requiring a Comprehensive Plan Amendment:
Title N, Section 4-9-180F requires that the proposed amendment demonstrate that it meets the review
criteria in RMC 4-9-020G for comprehensive plan amendments, is timely and meets at least one of the
following two criteria:
1) that the property is potentially classified for the proposed zone being
requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan; or,
2) it was not specifically considered at the last area land-use analysis, or,
since the last land-use analysis or area zoning of the subject property,
authorized public improvements, permitted private development or other
circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone significant and
material change.
This proposed amendment meets the first criteria. The revised proposal, as shown in Figure 7, meets
Policy LU-ll, LU-16, LU-16.1, LU-402, LU-50, and Objective LU-1.
A. Review Criteria tor Comprehensive Plan Amendments:
I. The request supports the vision embodied in the Comprehensive Plan, or
2. The request supports the adopted business plan goals established by the City Council, or
3. The request eliminates conflicts with existing elements or policies, or
4. The request amends the Comprehensive Plan to accommodate new policy directives of the
City Council.
The applicant's original proposed map amendments generally were not supported by the above
criteria. The revised proposal meets Criteria I as it implements the overall land use strategy for
residential single-family and small scale multi-family development articulated in Policy LU-ll, and
the specific mapping criteria cited in the analysis section of this issue paper.
CONCLUSION
It does not appear that CI land use designation can be supported in Area "A", the 13.88 acre portion in
the northwest corner of the site, since it is not supported by either Policy LU-138 or Policy LU-143.
Likewise it does not appear that the RO land use designation can be supported for Area "C", the 8.37-
acre portion in the northeast corner of the site, because of its poor accessibility and geographic
isolation.
Staff finds that the Area "A" is appropriate for RO land use and R-IO zoning, and that Area "B" is
appropriate for RS based on existing land use policy.
Staff further recommends that Area "C" retain its current land use designation and be rewned R-S.
Staff supports the retention of the existing RR designation in Area "D", with R-l zoning. These
changes are shown on attachment 7.
2002-M.{)1 Carr Rd.doc\ 7 8/6/03
r
PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST:
The state Environmental Policy Act (SEPAl, Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all govemmental agencies
to consider the environmental Impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact
statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse Impacts on the.
quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide Information to help you and the
agency Identify Impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid Impacts from the proposal, if It can
be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS Is required.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic Informalion about your proposal.
Govemmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental . Impacts of. your
proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most
precise Information known, or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,
you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need
to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal,
write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the queslions now may avoid unnecessary
delays later.
Some questiohs ask! about govemmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark
designations. Answer these questions If you can. If you have problems, the govemmental agencies can
assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even If you plan to do them over a period of
time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional Information that will help describe your
proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to
explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be
significant adverse impact. -
USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS:
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals. even though questions may be answered "does not
apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in
the checklist \0 the words "project: "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal:
'proposer: and "affected geographic area: respectively.
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
CITY OF RENTON
DEC 1 7 '~-l
RECEIVeu
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
~ ~~...IJ ~1f(.~A~
2. Name of applicant:
~ef~
3. .Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
4.
1055 ~~~ ~ lQII.. .:tDo5'~ it?-$ 1/10 b~
Date checklist prepared: ~t:.t..t
l2/n/ol
5. Agency requesting checklist:
c.u.,1i-~
8. Proposed timing or schedule (Including phasing, If applicable):
7. Do you have any plans for future addltlons, expansion, or further activHy related to or connected
with this proposal? If yes, explain.
8. List any environmental Infonnation you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared,
directly related to this proposal. ~el~~at.'P~ FIMI ~K ~'~4~
CAIJ II ~ ~witot, -St.,~ ~ f4.1115
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for govemmental approvals of other proposals
directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. I\} A..
10. list any govemmental approvals or pennits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. ~
11. Giv~ brief, complete description. of your proposal, Including the proposed uses and the size of
the project and site.
~e.~ .,IItef
2
, .
\
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient Information for a person to understand the precise
location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and
range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries
of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map. and topographic map, if
reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this
checklist.
~ wide. ~ -fvrt ~ 5fe, ~ ~ ~ tnIf ttwrrvlmettis
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. EARTH ~A..
a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling,· hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, .
other _____ _
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) ~
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify them· and note any
prime farmland. ~
d. Are there surface Indications or history of unstable soils In the Immediate vicinity? If so,
describe. NA
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading
proposed. Indicate source of fill. ~A
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally
describe.~
g. About what percent of the site will be covered. with Impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? ~
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control eroSion, or other Impacts to the earth, if any: fJA
3
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (I.e., dust, automobile,
odors, Industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project Is completed? If
any, generally describe and give approximate quantities If known. f,),\
. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affeot your proposal? If so,
generally describe. NI\ .
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impactS to air, If any""
3, WATER Ilh\
a, Surface Water:
1) Is there any($Urface water body on or In the Immediate vicinity of the. site· (Including year-
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,ponds,wetIands)? .. If yes, describe type
and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows Into. IJ.\
2) Will the project require any work over, In, or edjacentto (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.tJA
3) Estimate the amount of lilland dredge material that would be placed In or removed from
surface water or wellands and indicate ·the area of the site that would be affected.
Indicate the source of lill material. ~
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or (nversions? Give general
description, purpose,and approximate quantities If known. ~
5) Does the proposal lie within a 1 OO-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan.~
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. ~
, .
b. Ground Water:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn. or will water be discharged to ground water? Give
general description, purpose, and approximate quantHles If known. ~
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged Into the ground from septic tanks or other
sources, If any (for example: Domestic sewage; Industrial, containing the following
chemicals ... ; agriCUltural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of
such systems, the number of houses.tobe served (if applicable), or the number of
animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
c. Water Runoff (including storm water): NA
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm wate., and method of collection and
disposal, If any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water
flow Into other waters, If so, describe.
2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe~
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if
any:~
4. PLANTS ~
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
__ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
__ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs
__ grass
__ pasture
__ crop or grain
__ wet soli plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
__ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other
_._ other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants. or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any:
5
s. ANIMALS tvA
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known·
to be on or near the site:
Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other ____ -,... __
Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other.,.---,-______ _
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other ____ _
b. list any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the sHe.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain
d. Proposed measures to pre$$rve or enhance wildlife, If any:
6. ENERGY AND NA'IIliRAL RESOURCES ~
a. What kinds of enelDY (electric, natural gas, oil, wood. stove, sola" will be used to meet
the completed project's energy needs? Describe . whether Hwill be· used 'Jor heating,
manufactUring, etc.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,
generally describe.
c. What kinds of energy . conservation features are . Included in the plans of this proposal?
list other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, If any:
7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH JJA
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemlcels,
!'isk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a resuH of this
proposal? If so, describe.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, If any:
6
Environmental Checklist
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, other)?
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a
short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)?
Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
8. LAND AND SHOREUNE USE
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? ~ «~ ~
b. .. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. ~
c. Describe any structures on the site-OA
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? AJ.\
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? ~ ~ ~
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? ~ tlttttdol 'SIttit
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program (~,jgnation of the site? HA
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentall'.' sensitive" area? If so,
specify. "A
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? ~
7
Environmental ChecIcHst
9.
'.0.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected
land uses and plans, if any: ' .,to
AESTHETICS l)A
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure{s), not iiicluding antennas; what is
the principal exterior building material(s) proposed.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, If any:
11. .' LIGHT AND GLARE ~
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly
occur?
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
8
12.
13.
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? ~
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: ~
b. Would the proposed project displace any exislingrecreational uses?, If so, describe~
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation ~
opportunitiesio be provided by the project or, applicant, .If any:
HISTORIC AND CULTURAlPRESERVATION~~'P' ~'" &r:ta ~m .
fllSU\' .... ~~' teu1~ (S OJ~'T-~' ~ a. Are there any _ or ol)JeCls li1f'::1t, for, naet-na~'!\e, 0 5.
preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or
cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. ~
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control Impacts, if any: ~
14. TRANSPORl~~I~N Tt~tOV\ (JNJ Gtpi'R( f~ f~ -IDle rtV,tI«Il ~~WI~n~~r\ee an1hgfwa~, ~~sed access to
lRMf:;:;~sy:,:;;;site~ans,wany, • ~l= rI-'~
140 JtllJd -foL ~ ~J ~LfI\lPtldfllAlili ~ ~ It'\ 01-11-'1 {;,ffC4JliW1~
b. Is site currently served by public transii?lt not, ~~~e approximate dlstan'te ~ 19\A.
nearest transit stop? ~
¥.f", -tr~p.\ l~~.ftr ~ ~ ~-"'-I WDOr"fttbd'PJ, \.IIil(k~~ w~~l 02'~-'ltL~lIf~
c. Ho'Wf!a'ny parking spaces would the completed project have? How marif Would'itie"
project eliminate? ~
9
Eo .............. ~
d. Win the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to exIsIIng roads or
streets, not Including driveways? If so, generally descIIbe (Indicate whether pubJlc or
private? .\l.\,
e. Will the project use (or occur In the Immediate vlcinlly of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally descrlbe~
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the .completed project? If
known, Indicate when peak volumes would occur. J(M,
g. Proposed measures to reduce,or;controltransportallon Impacts, If any: Il?A
15. PUBUC SERVICES (}(I~ fPaL-rrte ~ -to~ ~ tb?-f 'If
;'('~Id :-~~ r~j{\~'t~ue~~bilc services (for example: fira
protection, police protection; health care, schools, othel)1.lf so"generally describe.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct Impacts on public services, If any. ~
16. UTIUTIES LrrrU(Jl6
a. Circle utilities currenliy available at the sHe: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse
service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. ~
b. Describe the utilHles that are proposed for the project, the utillly providing the service,
and the general construction activities on the ~e or In the Immediate vicinlly which
might be needed. "''' -
C. SIGNATURE
I, the' undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above Infonnatlon Is true and
Complete. It Is understood that the lead' agency may wHhdraw any deciaratlon of non-
significance that H might Issue In reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful
misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
PropOnent ~
Name Printed: ~ ~rJ
Date: I4. n ,~!!OI
10
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them In conjunction with the
list of the elements of the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities
likely to result from the proposal, would affect the Item. at a greater intensity or at a faster rate
than If the proposal were.not implemented. Respond briefly and In general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production,
storage, or release oftoxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? ~
2.
3.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
How would the proppsal be likely to affect plants, animals,. fISh, or marine life? .
ffln~ /n-J.t-D'/: ~ ~ ¥U4tS tedml~ Ju,~ ~ ~ ~~'P~ 1MlOdJ lttfutt,~aN~~_~
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, anlmdls, fish, or marine life are: ltttls
~(~Bn 01.-11-01 1J.A'JOr~1"~fJl C8c4l W\Wt, ~ ... ~ LdJi~lIWfIts',~ ~ioM~14I Old IJIMM~ ~
How would the pro-;~ be likely to deplete energy or natural-ridOurceS'>
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas
designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness,
wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat,historic or cultural sites,
wetlands, fiood plains, or prime farmlands? -
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, Inciudlng whether it would
allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
~~ ~I ~ ~M ~,q00-l ~ite, O)tM,(II_ ••.. L -i,ft.,llon V~""
4Id Ultjl~1 ~'I~ .k. . I l-"~t.
Proposed measu~ to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
11
6. How would the proposal be likely to Increase demands on transportation or public services and
utilities? ~'ftt~. ~l~~""'"tt:E iM~ ~bl/...lr.1 4.~ ~"fr?~ defWrU,,,,,JIIItJ. PtJ,,, ~ ol-ea·:a-:~r.r.;·,~ ~~~(re..J".f_dMl1ttti4m"" r IW(..t I~ I-~ p~posed measures to reduce or respond -toS66h demandfs1 are: ~ ~
7. Identify, If possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local,state, or federal laws or
requirements fOf the protection of the environmentlJaht.
SIGNATURE
I, . the· undersigned. state that to the best· of my knowledge' the aboveolnfonnatlon -·Is true· and
complete. It Is understood that the lead agency may· withdraw .-any··, declaretlon . of non-
significance that It might Issue In reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful
misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Proponent: . (l.Uu,.Jlj.Jrd
Name PrInted: BJrmfl LI rr1 .
Date: lAt. 0, 1401
ENIICHlST .DOC
REVISED 81911
12
, • •
~--~ --------------
, ' -, ,
• j
: __ ~~ ,,_J
NAME:
PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)IlOCATION and Zip Code:
CITY: ~ lbI\. ZIP: tj~sr
KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S):
TELEPHONE NUMBER: ~ ..q?i:J-'liB" CR. £,.J) IJA
~--------~--------~
EXISTING LAND USE(S):S!, ~ ~
-~ • ---, "j
. . !
-_. .. jj
NAME:
PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Ste. attae.kl $Net
COMPANY (H applica~e):
I=lllli':TINCl COMPIREliHISI\IE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:
ADDRESS: I-PIROI>()~;ED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION ~ ________ ~~Vid~~I~I~~e):
CITY: ZIP:
TELEPHONE NUMBER
-. --. . , .
.. ~ ~-~-"-"-"
COMPANY (H applica~e):
ADDRESS:~
CITY: ZIP:
TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E·MAIL ADDRESS:
masterap.doc Revised Apri12001
EXISTING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING (H applicatlle):,
SITE AREA (in square feel):
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED
FOR SUBDNlSIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING
TIiREE LOTS OR MORE en apprlCSble):
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET
ACRE (H applicable):
NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (Happlicable):
NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable):
NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applica~e):
'\ -\ 1'1 , . -.-~ ~ ~-----~ -~. ~--------
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAl
BUILDINGS (if applicable): """
PROJECT VALUE: All\,
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (rt applcable):A'lA.
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAl
IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF
ENVIRONMENTALLY CRmCAL AREA. PLEASE INCLUDE
SQUARE FOOTAGE (rt applicable):
BUILDINGS (if applicable): klA
o AQUIFER PROTECTION.AREA ONE
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): ~ o FLOOD HAZARD AREA
NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAl BUILDINGS (rt o GEOLOGIC HAZARD
___ sq.ft.
___ sq.ft.
___ sq.ft.
___ sq.fI.
___ sq.ft.
applicable): ten\,. o HABITAT CONSERVATION
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE o SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES
o WETLANDS NEW PROJECT (If applicable): t.')A.
_ ANNEXATION (A) $ SHORELINE REVIEWS
_ COMP PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) $ ----_ CONDITIONAL USE (SM-C) $ • _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (ClJ-A, CU-H) $ _ EXEMPTION (SME) $ f:jQCHAR!25
_ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (ECF) $ _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT (SM) $
_ GRADE & FILL PERMIT (GF) $ _ VARIANCE (SM-V) $
(No. CU. Yds: ) $
_REZONE(R) $ SUBDIVISION
ROUTINE VEGETATION $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN (BSP) $
MANAGEMENT PERMIT (RVMP) _ FINAL PLAT (FP) $
_ SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-A, SA-H) $ _ LOT UNE ADJUSTMENT (LLA) $
_ SPECIAL PERMIT (SP) $ _ PREUMINARY PLAT (PP) $
_ TEMPORARY PERMIT (TP) $ _ SHORT PLAT (SHPL-A, SHPL-H) $
_ VARIANCE (V-A, V-H. V-8) $
(from Section: $ Postage: $
_WAlVER(W) $ TOTAL FEE $
OTHER: $
·1. (print Name) • dedare that I am (please check one) _the current owner of the
property Involved In !his application or __ the au1horized representative 10 act for a corporation (please attach proof of au1horizatlon) and 1/lat the
foregoing statements and a...-rs herein contained and the Information herewith are In aU respects true and corract to the best of my knowledge and
belief.
(Name of OwnerlRepresentaU",,)
~ (Signature of OwnerlRepresentau...)
mastenp.doc Rrnsed April 2001
I certify that I know or have sallsfactory evidence 1haI .. -:-:-;==cc-:-==::-:-:==-
slgned this Instrument and acknowledged H to be hlslher/lhelr fi'ee and voluntary ad for
the uses and purposes mentioned In the Instrument
Notary Public In and for the State of Washington
Notary (Prlnt), ___________ _
My appolnlmentexpires: _________ _
\
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
12119/01
City Staff
Andree DeBauw ro
LUAOI-16S/City Wide Camp. Plan Map & Text Amendments
This file has not been routed at the request of Rebecca Lind, Project Manager.
H:\DIVISION,S\DEVELOP,SER\DEV &PLAN .lNG\Ad\M cmos\PW MEMO.doc\cor