The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA-01-167_Report 1Existing R-8 R-8 ILCP) R-8 '1 , I RN-I CA CA ,'ILCP) r----------L_ R-10 IL IL CP) KC Dept. of Health (2003-M-02) Landuse & Zoning Proposed R-8 R-8 ILCP) R-8 RN-I CA / CA ~ CA 1------------- R-10 I L ILCP) --Study Area c:::::I CI -Center Institution c:::::::::J EA-C -Employment Area Ccmmercial c:::::J EA-I -Employment Area InstnuHonal c:::J RM-I -Residentia l Multi-Family Infi!! c:::::::::J RD· Residentia l Options c::::J AS· Residentia l Sing le Famity o 400 800 t ':::::::vxj I : 4800 !Fe CI~I:ni~!:i1~~~?o;:: ~~ 0'" 1055 South Grady Way -Renton Washington 98055 ~ ?RSRi F \RS1-CLf\SS SEI\ \/1\ ;N;l ',,-.' ;.~~ f~';';~ II ~< ~!'3 ,_! l ,-:; , _Ci i' 'Ii -,-, I .. -: ,t _j , \\:'\ U\ \ ' ~-"'- I .. ' ,,'\ ;.-, 'Y' .~ . -I',' '0 I.' , " :-J , ~\ !'3 i'.'I',; / 723650003509 BROWN KYLE D+ANGELINA L 12646 SE 42ND ST #37 BELLEVUE WA 98006 ~t'~~4j;a:JZ! 'i , ~ijG C &;9 ,\ ,,~~~ -a 3 s; ~. 08109\~') ,,' ~'1z7; :: "j 11: N.l-J ~ i R!{:""t-'. I 'Ji:{.:.-." ~ '} U::67:.1.~~:,,~,:",i~~,;:],,:~'S~LJ; ~ ,-..:.~~---.~ ·;:"r.iC:· ~lC:li-;(M,:c, ~r··ilo ... _·1 .g,~1::),,,.::'7,,:,,~''Z::ra 11. / ,,/ ,,/, 1/,,, ,I, /" / ,/'" // ... /, I" JI "././,1.1 .. 1,.1.,.; H.I NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Master ApplicatiOn has been filed and accepted with the Development Services DMsion of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necassary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBERlNAME: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT LOCATION: PUBLIC APPROVALS: APPLICANTIPROJECT CONTACT PERSON: LUA-01-167, CPA, R, ECF; King County Health Department; 3005 NE 4~ Street; CPA #2oo3-M-2 City sponsored proposal to change the Comprehensive Plan land use designation of a 4.73-ocre site from Center Institution with Light Indusblal (IL) zoning to Employment Area -Commercial with Commercial Arterial (CA) zomng. The property is located south of NE 4" Stree~ west of Monroe Avenue NE. Environmental Review. Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone City of RentonIDon Erickson, EDNSP Dept, Strategic Planning, 425-430-Q581 Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Don Erickson, Project Manager, Strategic Planning Division, 1055 SOuth Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on August 22, 2003. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be mede a party of record and receive additional notification by mall, contact Don Erickson al (425) 430..&581. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I DATE OF APPLICATION: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: December 17, 2001 June 25, 2002 August 8, 2003 I} N If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and retum to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 SOuth Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. File No./Name: LUA-01-167, CPA, R, ECF; King County Public Health Center Comp Plan Amendment and Rezone NAME __________________________________________________________ __ ADDRESS: ___________________________________________________ _ TELEPHONE NO.: _____________ _ NOTICE OF APPUCATl01.doc ,. . c:J ....... . . / KC Dept. of Health (2003-M-02) Vicinity Map e &onomic Development. Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning + am + Alex Pietsch, Administrator ~ G. Del Rosario '1' 16June2003 --Study Area o 800 1600 I ! I 1 : 9600 KC Dept. of Health (2003-M-02) Aerial Map a ]00 200 f=:!! i 1 : 2400 --Study Area • ~ "-l , A' I ~'"'" " ~ r:~' -~"-~::titZ~!:, __ 2U_l.i-;;~~1!ZZa- j,ij ,,t/' / -~):~~2;:-::" -:-r./ ,-, .. , -.... _<.C";_, I <1'<' __ ----;: __ -"") j ~ / ,/: I~." i <·."I ·'-·--"'-"-t-J W ,.;.... k • _.' ,'-:7-' i .. ~ ~ I"~ >¢ J ' :? " ~:'''. \ ~~g , -~ t,. "" "f? ~. " .' '::t\.._~ ~Y' ''''----~-F, J. J ---., ~. ! J / , 1 -~----.. ""----'-.,,-,,~ "'~~ , J ~ KC Dept. of Health (2003-M-02) Sensitive Areas --Study Area ~>40%Sl o pe ,.. __ .... o o f (:--~;~~ .. ~~:~.: ? q o 400 800 l..n ....•.•.•.......... ! ..... _ ......... _._ •.•.• _._ •.•.•. ~J r--------W&1 --------------, I : 4800 ~ r , .: t '. ~, >r-~ ".~ . ~ "if· .···M ,J-. ~ .. "',,, A· -;.,.: , , r '-- , T ,. \ \ ~ ~-I'" ---=- ---"----~ :[.. ,,\ J I -j ,-. :J.r .. \ . t , , \ '. w ~ 1.._ '"' •• I <4 , / • / I 1/ ! r I .. • ~.!' ~~ f I~ '\. "', I .. ~ I ..... .,... ,.r--,;. KC Dept. of Health (2003·M·02) Topography Map -Study Area 1 m Interval Contour "' ~ .. -~ ( ~ I o 400 800 , ·····12'==&1 I: 4800 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Date: To: From: MEMORANDUM November 4, 2010 City Clerk's Office Stacy M Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to faCilitate project closeout and Indexing by the City Clerk's Office Project Name: King County DOH Rezone LUA (file) Number: lUA-01-167, ECF, R Cross-References: ORD 5105, 2004 Comp Plan Amendments, CPA Rezone 2004, King County Department of Health 2004 AKA's: Project Manager: Don Erickson Acceptance Date: June 25, 2002 " Applicant: City of Renton Owner: King County Facilities COntact: Don Erickson, EDNSP -City of Renton PID Number: 1623059130 ERC Decision Date: ERC Appeal Date: Administrative Denial: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: City initiated rezone & comp plan amndmt from CI/Il to EAC/CA for King Co. Dept. of Health, 5 acres at SE 3rd/4th St. Location: 3001 NE 4th Street Comments: November 1,2004 Monday, 7:30 p.m. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL OF COUNCILMEMBERS CITY STAFF IN ATTENDANCE SPECIAL PRESENT A TION AJLS: Mayor's Presentation of2005 Budget RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting November 1, 2004 MINUTES Council Chambers Renton City Hall Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler called the meeting of the Renton. City Council to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. DON PERSSON, Council President; RANDY CORMAN; TONI NELSON; DAN CLAWSON; DENIS LAW; TERRI BRIERE; MARCIE PALMER. KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief Administrative Officer; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; BONNIE W ALTON, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; ALEX PIETSCH, Economic Development Administrator; CHIEF LEE WHEELER, Fire Department; VICTORIA RUNKLE, Finance and Information Services Administrator; SYLVIA DOERSCHEL, Finance Analyst Supervisor; JILL MASUNAGA, Finance Analyst III; DENNIS CULP, Community Services Administrator; MIKE WEBBY, Human Resources Administrator; DEREK TODD, Assistant to the CAO; CHIEF GARRY ANDERSON and COMMANDER CHARLES MARSALISI, Police Department. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler presented her proposed City of Renton 2005 Budget to members of the City Council and Renton citizens. She stated that Renton's economy is strong; however, along with other municipalities in the State of Washington, the City faces new fiscal realities. Regarding the state of the City's economy, the Mayor said sales tax revenues are expected to increase by 5.5 percent in 2004. The City continues to enjoy explosive growth in revenue from new construction, and there is renewed interest in new development projects in the downtown and valley areas. The Boeing Company's employment levels seem to be stabilizing, and PACCAR's Kenworth Plant has realized increased production. Additionally, the City looks forward to the redevelopment of surplus property at Boeing's Renton Plant in South Lake Washington. AlOHa" VQoll~or lllhaalpr cajoted out that theca cnCCOCCOQ oro rot Printed on 10/28/2010 1 from Folio document The Mayor stated that the total proposed 2005 Budget is $149,392,500, of which $69,106,300 is the General Governmental Budget. Reviewing the highlights of the proposed budget, she explained how the RENSTAT (a program that addresses, identifies, and targets crime) and REACT (a program that addressed non-criminal activities and nuisance abatement) programs will begin to be implemented. In the budget proposal, the code enforcement officers will transfer to the Police Department from the Planning/Building/Public Works Department, and a police service specialist will be added. Continuing, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler stated that the proposed budget addresses the medical and long-term care costs of an retired Law Enforcement Officers and Firefighters hired before 1977, by establishing a new fund to track these retiree costs separately from costs for active employees, and by using $260,000 in Fire Pension monies to assist in funding the long-term care costs. She also noted that effective July 2005, the City must pay increased rates to the State for the retirement program for active employees, which will cost $500,000 next year. Turning to the reduction of expenditures, the Mayor stated that the proposed budget eliminates five vacant regular positions. Additionally, the Development Services and Transportation Divisions will eliminate a total of $52,000 in temporary summer help. Expenditure reductions also include turning off 500 arterial streetl ights around the City, saving $60,000; eliminating lifeguards at Kennydale Beach, saving $35,000; and reducing several line items in various departments. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler recommended using $1.2 million of available funds to balance the General Governmental Budget, noting that even with a $630,000 reduction in expenditures, the available fund balance is still needed to meet the City's needs. She also pointed out that the proposed budget includes a rate increase on water and sewer services, increasing the average bill from $79.67 to $80.36. Additionany, an increase in Metropolitan King County Council's water treatment rate results in an increase to this portion of the utility bin from $23.40 to $25.60. Concluding, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler stated her commitment to continue to provide services at levels the City can afford, to look c ccr .. ' .. Printed on 1012812010 2 from Folio document ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2004 and beyond. Items noted included: CONSENT AGENDA Council Meeting Minntes of October 25,2004 CAG: 04-\33, Gene Coulon Park Boat Launch Repair, Skaar Construction CAG: 04-097, Community Center Roof Replacement, Lloyd A Lynch Development Services: Latham Short Plat, Meadow Ave N, SHP-04-033 • A new edition of CityView is now airing on Renton cable channel 21, featuring the Volunteer Cedar River Naturalist Program, Mary Ann Edwards Lewis Historical Moment, Salvation Anny Renton Food Bank, Renton Senior Activity Center 25th Anniversary Celebration, Grateful for Grandparents Program, CPR Classes, Moment with the Mayor, Volunteer Spotlight, and the Soccer Challenge. • The Highlands Neighborhood Center hosted their annual Kids Night Halloween Party on October 22nd, with over 150 children participating in this free drop-in Club Highlands program. Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Approval of Council meeting minutes of October 25, 2004. Council concur. City Clerk reported bid opening on 10/20/2004 for CAG-04-133, Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park Boat Launch Repair; seven bids; engineer's estimate $110,000 to $150,000; and submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder, Skaar Construction, Inc., in the amount of $119,379.71. Refer to Finance Committee for discussion of funding. Community Services Department submitted CAG-04-097, Renton Community Center Roof Replacement; and requested approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of $24,948.93, commencement of60-day lien period, and release of retainage bond in the amount of$3,723.80 to Lloyd A. Lynch, Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. Development Services Division recommended acceptance of dedication of additional right-of-way to widen Meadow Ave. N. to fulfill a requirement ofthe Latham Short Plat (SHP-04-033). Council concur. Printed on 10/28/2010 3 from Folio document UNFINISHED BUSINESS Committee of the Whole Transportation: 1-405 Corridor Project, Renton Hill Access Finance Committee Finance: Bond Issuance, Water, Sewer & Stormwater Projects RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES Finance: Bond Issuance, Water, Sewer & Stormwater Projects MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Council President Persson presented a Committee of the Whole report regarding the 1-405 Corridor Project and Renton Hill access. The Committee was briefed by the Washington State Department of Transportation on the 1-405 Corridor Project including access to 1-405 via Renton Hill. At this time, no further action needs to be taken. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance Committee Chair Corman presented a report regarding the issuance of water and sewer revenue bonds for capital construction projects. The Committee recommended concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the issuance of$10,335,000 in water and sewer revenue bonds, increasing the City's debt for the purpose of completing capital construction projects to include the Maplewood Water Treattnent Facility, the Sunset Interceptor, and the SW 7th SI. Storm System Improvements. The Committee further recommended that the ordinance regarding this matter be presented for first and second reading. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See below for ordinance. ) The following ordinance was presented for first reading and advanced for second and final reading: An ordinance was read relating to the waterworks utility of the City, including the sewerage system as a part thereof; providing for the issuance of$10,335,000 aggregate principal amount of Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, 2004, ofthe City for the purpose of obtaining the funds with which to pay the costs of carrying out certain capital improvements of the waterworks utility; fixing the date, form, denominations, maturities, interest rates, terms, and covenants of the bonds; providing for bond insurance; and approving the sale and providing for the delivery of the bonds to D.A. Davidson & Co., Seattle, Printed on 10/28/20104 from Folio document Ordinance #5098 Finance: Bond Issuance, Water, Sewer & Stonnwater Projects Ordinance #5099 Planning: 2004 Comp Plan Update Ordinance #5100 Planning: 2004 Comp Plan Update Implementation, Development Regulations Amendments Ordinance #5101 Planning: 2004 Update of Zoning Map Ordinance #5102 Rezone: Smith Property, SW Sunset Blvd, R-8 to CN, CPA Following second and final reading of the above-referenced ordinance, it was MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for second and final reading and adoption: An ordinance was read amending the Comprehensive Plan to comply with the mandated 2004 State Growth Management Act review and update, and adopting Comprehensive Plan text, maps, and data in conjunction therewith. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. An ordinance was read amending Chapter 4-2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, Chapter 4-3, Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts, Chapter 4-4, Citywide Property Development Standards, Chapter 4-6, Street & Utility Standards, Chapter 4-7, Subdivision Regulations, Chapter 4-8, Pennits -General and Appeals, Chapter 4-9, Pennits -Specific, and Chapter 4-11, Definitions; of Tide IV (Development Regulations) of City Code in order to implement the 2004 State Growth Management Act update to the Comprehensive Plan. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. An ordinance was read adopting the Citywide zoning map amendments to the zoning classifications of properties located within the City of Renton, and identified as part of the 2004 State Growth Management Act mandated update of the Comprehensive Plan. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property consisting of? ,240 square reet located at 624 SW Sunset Blvd. from R-8 (Residential-eight dwelling units per acre) to CN (Commercial Neighborhood) zoning; Smith Property. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT TUR DDonr,\ bleD;" un A n nOT T C" T T '" T T ", VPR Printed on 10/28/2010 5 from Folio document Ordinance #5103 Rezone: Handly Property, SW Sunset Blvd, R-8 to CN, CPA Ordinance #5104 Rezone: Bonilla Property, SW Sunset Blvd, R-8 to CN, CPA Ordinance #5105 Rezone: King County Health Department Property, NE 4th St, IL to CA, CPA D\ -tLP 1 Ordinance #5106 Rezone: Mroczek Property, SW 4th PI, R-8 to CN, CPA NEW BUSINESS Council: 2005 Council President Election (Briere), 2005 Council President Pro Tern Election (Corman) An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property consisting of 10,780 square feet located at 620 SW Sunset Blvd. from R-8 (Residential -eight dwelling units per acre)'to CN (Commercial Neighborhood) zoning; Handly Property. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property consisting of 6,080 square feet located at 632 SW Sunset Blvd. from R-8 (Residential-eight dwelling units per acre) to CN (Commercial Neighborhood) zoning; Bonilla Property. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property consisting of 17.2 acres located at 3001 NE 4th St. from IL (Light Industrial) to CA (Commercial Arterial) zoning; King County Health Department Property. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property consisting of 12,078 square feet located at 700 SW 4th PI. from R -8 (Residential -eight dwelIing units per acre) to CN (Commercial Neighborhood) zoning; Mroczek Property. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL OPEN NOMINATIONS FOR 2005 COUNCIL PRESIDENT AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM. CARRIED. Council President Persson nominated Councilwoman Briere as Council President for 2005 and Councilman Corman as Council President Pro Tem for 2005. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CLOSE NOMINATIONS. CARRIED. Renaction on Renton School DiStrict activities events and bonors Printed on 10/28/2010 6 from Folio document Community Event: General Election, 11/2/2004 Public Works: Landsburg Mine Contaminates ADJOURNMENT Recorder: Michele Neumann Mayor Keolker-Wheeler noted the General Election on November 2, 2004, and encouraged everyone to vote. Councilman Clawson reported that he is a member of the Cedar River Council and noted an issue pertaining to contaminates at the Landsburg Mine (located off ofSE Summit Landsburg Rd., north of Ravensdale). Stating that the Department of Ecology is conducting tests, he expressed concern regarding potential downstream contamination to Renton and suggested that the Administration review the matter and determine whether the City should be involved. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE ADMINISTRATION. CARRIED. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 8:26 p.m. Bonnie I. Walton, CMC, City Clerk Printed on 10/28/20107 from Folio document NOTICE OF APPLICATION A MIISIar AppIicallol\ hu been r;ad ilI1d IICC8pled with till! ~nt Servioel DMllDn otthe City ofRentoo. The following briel'l)l dtlSClibea t~B apploca~on ~nd the neceuary PubicAj)proYlO&. PROJECT NUM8!RIMAME: PROJECT I)EI~I'TION: PROJECT LOCATION' PUBUC APPROVALS; APPUCANTIPROJECT CC»ITACT PI!RSOH: LUA-Ol-j67, CPA, R, ECF; King County Hee!lh Dej>lrtment 30(15 !'IE (" snet: CPAI:1.003-M_2 City ""onsored PfOPOHI 10 change !he C_~...... Plan IIInd .... de",,"MtiOl1 of • .oI.73-acN ,Il10 fn;rm c.trter IMUlutlon "'"" LiIif11 IndUlINl (IL) zoning 10 Employment ...... _ CcmmwdII with CI;lll1~ Anlr\aI (CAl zoong. The property is Iooated 100111 of HE 4-S1rMI, _ 01 Mtnroe AvenUll He. City 01 RentorVDan Er\d(I.Qn, EDNSP o.pt, Stra!egicPlanni"ll. ~2~3MMI Comments OI'! the above ~ppl;catlo~ must b~ submitted In MftiIg 10 Don Ericktcw1, project MIruogIll", S1nrItogk; Pilnr'Ong OMlion, 1056 Sooth GIW:I~ Way, Renton, WA ~SIl55, by 5:00 PM on Augulll 22, 200), "yoo have quesIIonIabootlhls Pf'tlPDl8l, Of wIIh 10 bIo mad<! • party of """"" ""d """""" IICIdllon.l notibtJan by mall, ooo!acl DM Erlc:uon at (425) ~Q"&'I. Anyan ...... o tlJbm,IB wriUen comment. Wlilaotom.tlo;alll' beocom&. party of I'8CCII'd and wit tao nc>Ilfted of any ~.lon,,"Ih.~ PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALUNG FOR PROPE.A FILE IDENnFICATION DAT! OF APPUCATlON: Deumblr17.2oo1 NOnCE OF COMPLETt! APPLICA TJON: June 211. 2002 OAT! 01' NOTICI! 01' APPLICATION: Augusta, 200~ . ;;;V; ;.'.' -~;'i.1 If yoo \ItOU1d like !D ~ made 8 pari)' 01 ",O<II'<! to ",ceI\Oe ~r Inramallon on Ihlll ~ projecI. ecmpktlto ttU ram alld..twn!D: CilyofR..,ton. Devefopmenl Planning. 1055 Sooth G/lIdyWay. Renloo. WA SeOM. Fie No.!N .... e: LUA-O\-16l. CPA. R. ECF: KI .... Cou~ I'YbIk:,.....1II\ CerarComp PI.,., Amendm.,t,nd Rezone ... ,,-------------------- ADORESS: ______________________ _ TELEPfotONE 1'10.: ____________ _ CERTIFICATION ~""'''''''' I ~ 1f~ ...... ...\ KA '_ t c:t::;1'Zl'1.. -, Z-=----~"{.~~ ...... ~O ... ~II~above document were posted by me in -_«--- I .' SIO/y '. • >;c. ... : .~~s ~-tQ' .• _~e described property on ______ -;>'~~~ : .'"" oT"~ '1>.o'{\. : fO ~ "'7}-"'~ i S:igne~~~;;:=~~~J~~~t:: ~:o en: ~ ., . ~.... . ~ ~:p C:f ------~ ~ '.. UBU .:' ~ST: Subscribed and sworn before me. a N(.wv-PlIblrc, and for the State of \~;,··· .• ~.29-01 ...... "'O ~ashington residing iltJ3 4n i, t "-. on the /,;;;"" '>Lda'/hY of Qq' ,0~~.. A'AA'/, " ~O .......... ~~~-: kt---~~aJ "" 'I' WAS"" _--'"",,,, .................... ... MARILYN KAMCHfFF MY APPOINTMFNTFXPIRF< <.?O'" I LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN JOO·FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430·7200 Fax: 425-430·7231 PROJECT NAME: Ki"-S Co. 4ca {-h, l"kpt. CPri APPLICATION NO: lenA Of -kl , (PI!, e,c. F, R- The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS Q:\ WEB\PW\DEVSER V\AFORM\afonnlistospo.doc06/25102 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER . ~ ..... -. , . . ,-. (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) NAME ADDRESS '. "f ~. , ! : ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER . .... . -' Applicant Certification I, ---,C!J~M1~L..:.:O~h.-~\2.ifi1i~' ~~~IO~ _____ " hereby certify that the above list(s} of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: Title Company Records '/King County Assessors Records signed~6 (Applicant) Date NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at on the __ day of , 20 __ . Signed, _______________ _ (Notary PubliC) \ • _ ....... ' ........ IIW"t;U "''''!E;III;~ .... 01-1\0/ Use template for 5160'111 723650003509 2305912006 3650005504 • BROWN KYLE D+ANGELINA L CHANTELLE LUXURY APT HOMES EIXENBERGER LINDA M 12646 SE 42ND ST #37 LLC 443 INDEX AV NE BELLEVUE WA 98006 2828 NE 3RD ST RENTONWA 98056 RENTON W A 98056 162305906206 162305913004 162305905901 GILROY F AMJL Y LLC KING COUNTY LAPIANTALP 9633 NE 30TH pL 500A K C ADMIN BLDG PO BOX 88028 BELLEVUE WA 98004 500 FOURTH A V TUKWILA WA 98138 SEATTLE WA 98104 723650006007 723650005009 723650004507 MADISON THOMAS J MCPEAK RUSSELL+MARIE CO-TTE PATRICK VICKI 31845 197THAV SE MCPEAK F AMIL Y TRUST 2920 NE 4TH ST KENTWA 98042 409 JEFFERSON A V NE RENTON WA 98056 RENTON W A 98056 723650004002 723650003004 162305911701 PHILLIPSB RANDALL CHARLES K RENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY 2914NE4THAV 402 INDEX PL NE 970 HARRINGTON NE RENTON WA 98056 RENTON W A 98056 RENTON WA 98056 722780050000 162305905802 162305905208 RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE U-HAUL REAL ESTATE COMAPNY VOIGTLANDER HALLE-VON PTSP 3000 NE4TH ST PO BOX 29046 DEPT 1100 -WAS04 RENTONWA 98056 PHOENIX AZ 85038 20225 N SCOTTSDALE RD SCOTTSDALE AZ 85255 flAVERY® Address Labels I)f;I>T of ~ , IF-I Laser Project Proposals Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2003 City Initiated Application 2003-M-Ol (LUA-Ol-165) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendment Washington State Department of Transportation, 55 acres located at South Talbot Road and South 43'" Street. Residential Rural to Residential Single Family, Residential Planned Neighborhood or Residential Options, and Employment Area Office. This amendment requests consideration of a change in land use designation from Residential Rural (R-I zoning) to a combination of Employment Area-Office (CO zoning), Residential Single Family (R-B zoning) and Residential Options or Residential Planned Neighborhood (R- IO or R-14 zoning) to promote redevelopment of this area and diversification of the tax-base. The property owner requests clustering future development sites in three zones based on topography. The review process will consider whether an increase in residential capacity for detl\Ched and attached homes and additional office capacity implements the overall objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and City Council Business Plan Goals. Application 2003-M-02 (LUA-Ol-167) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendment King County Department of Health, 5 acres located at SE 3"'/4" St., Employment Area- Industrial to Employment Area Commercial or Center Suburban. This amendment is a request to evaluate the redevelopment potential of this site as a mixed-use designation allowing a combination of residential and office/medical clinic uses. The review process will consider whether an increase in residential capacity is appropriate at this location. The office and medical clinic uses are already allowed under existing lndustrialland use policies and IL zoning. Application 2003-M-03 (LUA-Ol-166) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendment, 20,625 square feet ofright of way between the eastern edge of the 1-405 corridor on the west and Cedar River trail on the east. Owned by Washington State Department of Transportation, Center-Office Residential to Resource Conservation. This amendment is a technical correction to the Land Use map rectifying the designation of this remnant parce\. Application 2003-M-04 (LUA-Ol-168) City of Renton, Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendment to review the Single Family Designation for 2,592 acres within the East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area. Residential Single Family to Residential Rural. This application will consider whether the overall Comprehensive Plan Vision, Land Use Element and Housing Element policies are better implemented by the Residential Rural Designation with potential RC, R-l or R-5 zoning or by the Residential Single Family Designation with potential R-5 or R-8 zoning. This review will focus on the land capacity, lot size, housing types and other development standards implementing the R -5 zone compared with the R-B zone in the City of Renton, and on the type of development allowed in the corresponding King County R -4 or R -6 zoning. The review will also consider transportation and road capacity issues within this corridor. H:\EDNSP\Comp Plan\Amendments\GMA Update\Map\ProjecL Proposals Sununary3.doc Application 2003-M-6 (LUA-Ol-163) City of Renton, Amendment to Comprehensive Plan Map to adjust parcel boundary between Liberty Ridge and Aegis Properties Residential Planned Neighborhood, with R-IO Zoning to Employment Area Industrial with IL zoning. This small piece of land fronts on NE 3"'. It is currently part of the Liberty Ridge property. The property owners are proposing a lot line adjustment to consolidate the small wedge with the Aegis property. The owner of the Aegis property is purchasing this "miss ing piece" to create full frontage. The proposal is to change the land use designation of the wedge to be consistent with the Employment Area Industrial designation already on the Aegis property. Application 2003-M-8 (LUA-Ol-l64) City of Renton, Merlino Map Amendment request to amend Land Use Designation from Residential Multifamily Infill to Residential Options and amend the existing Development Agreement to reduce density on the site. The proposal is to change the Comprehensive Plan land use designation for 25.68 acres from RM-I to RO as well as amend Section 3 of the September 2000 Development Agreement between the City of Renton and the owners, SR 900 LLC. The site is located along the south side of SR -900 about 950 feet east of its intersection with 68"' Avenue South. H:IEDNSPlComp PlanlAmendrnentslGMA Updare\MaplProject Proposals Summary3.doc 2 NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBERINAME: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT LOCATION: PUBLIC APPROVALS: APPUCANTIPROJECT CONTACT PERSON: LUA-01-167, CPA, R, ECF; King County Health Departmen~ 3005 NE 4-Street, CPA #2003-M-2 City sponsored proposal to change the Comprehensive Plan land use designation of a 4.73-acre site from Center Institution with Light Industrial (IL) zoning to Employment Area -Commercial with Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning. The property is located south of NE 4th Street, west of Monroe Avenue NE. Environmental Review, Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone City of RentonlDon Erickson, EDNSP Dept, Strategic Planning, 425-430-6581 Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Don Erickson, Project Manager, Strategic Planning Division, 1055 Soutl1 Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on August 22, 2003, If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of necord and receive additional notification by mail, contact Don Erickson at (425) 430-6681. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I DATE OF APPLICATION: Decembar 17, 2001 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPUCATION: DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: If you would like to be made a party of necord to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this Ionm and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. File No./Name: LUA-01-167, CPA, R, ECF; King County PubUc Health Center Camp Plan Amendment and Rezone NAME: ______________________________________________________________ __ ADDRESS: ________________________________________________________ __ TELEPHONE NO.: __________________________ __ NOTICE OF APPUCAn01.doc Iesse Tanner, Mayor August8,2003 King County Facilities King County Admin. Bldg. 500 4th Ave. Seattle, WA 98104 Subject: King County Health Department CPA LUA-01-167,CPA,ECF,R Dear King County Facilities: CITY C I' RENTON PlanningIBuildingi. ublic Works Department Gre&g Zimmerman P.E., Administrator The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. it is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on August 26, 2003. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at (425) 430-6851, if you have any questions. Don Erickson Senior Planner ------I~05~5~S~o~uth-G~r8~d~y~W~a~y~-~Re~n-to-n-, W-8s-h-in-gt-o-n-9-80-5-5----~-R E N T ~ * Tnfli paper con!i:llns 50% rtteyded material, 30% pos1 consumeJ AHEAD Of THE CURVE. City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: Khq 1Iou;t;r;;&!t6ec ~ // ADDRESS: v K/~ ViJl~/IIJI'!( 11-DI,? 57CJ (ZPo /wJ;~ CITY: ~eJ W/l ZIP: 7?/tJf TELEPHONE NUMBER: C413? ~-f?fI6- APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: 6~ 0& 1(~ COMPANY (,n{pplicable): De.j:l2r6mtd EPIUSP . ADDRESS:j06!3 5 &4/q 1J.I1Pl CITY: l?e4tft7/ U/;1 i(p:ftif~ TELEPHONE NUMBER 91 +0£7 --'1X'/-&3 CONTACT PERSON NAME: Don £f/'!~ cO~~lfappliCl!!~ -~t. ;p;p tlti. c!J CD 1'1M{/f1 11 " o· ADDR~O[73' 5 6~fJ W:rf7- CITY: R'~j fi/,4-ZIP: fibzP TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: f-(?,5~1-» -G5f/ Q:lWEBIPWlDEVSERVlAFORMlafonnmast<:oapp.doc06I25102 PROJECT INFORMATION KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): EXlsnN~ ~i US (St!; EXISTING COM~E~~NSIVE P~ ~ DESIGNATION: (];£ -{./tIt1#! ::tmtm1f1fio PROPOSED ZONING (If applicable): {!4. SITEAREA (in square feel): ~ObZl ' SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED FOR SUBDMSIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING THREE LOTS OR MORE (If applicable): M PROPOSED RESIDENTJA/.; ENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (If applicable): ;f.!1t, NUMBE ~ PnOJECTINFORMATrl_O_N~(~co_n_~_ .. ~J~ed=)~ ____________ ~ N~~ OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (If applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (If appflC8ble): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN flf applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (If applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (If applicable): NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (If applicable): PROJECT VALUE: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN /W'( TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTAU.. Y CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (If applicable): o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE )( AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA "TWO o FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. o GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. o HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. o SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. o WETLANDS sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following Information Included) SITUATE IN THE QUARTER OF SECTION -' TOWNSHIP -' RANGE-, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES Ust all land use applications being applied for: 1. 3. 2. 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I. (prinI NameIs) declare that I 8111 (please check one) _ the current owner of the p<operty Involved In tills application or __ the auIhorIzed II!pIeSentaIMo to act for a COQ>Ot8tion (please attach JlfOOI of authorizalion) and that the foIegoIng statements and answetS henIIn contained and the InfonnaIIon herewiIh 11/8 In an respects """ and correct to the best of my "'-ledge and belief. (Signature of OwnerIRepreserUlive) (Signature of 0WnerIRepresenI) Q:lWE8IPW1DEVSERV\AFORM\afonnmasterapp.doc06l2SI02 1 certify that 1 know or have satisfacloly evidence Ihat.......",...,..,......--:--:-...,..----;..,...-;; signed tIIis Instrument and acI<nowfedgod • to be hlsnlerllhelr free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned In the Instrument NoIaJy Public In and for the Stale of Washington ~ry~---------------------- My appoInbnent expires:~ ______ __ f APPLICATION 2003-M-02 (LUA-D1-167) LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATION FROM CENTER INSTITUTION TO EMPLOYMENT AREA -COMMERCIAL AND TO REZONE FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL OWNER: KING COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON DESCRIPTION The proposal is to change the Comprehensive Plan designation of a parcel from Center fustitution (CI) with Light fudustrial (IL) zoning to Employment Area -Commercial (EA-C) with Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning. The property is located south ofNE 4th Street, west of Momoe Avenue NE. The total parcel size is 4.73 acres. ISSUE SUMMARY This application is for a designation that would allow a mix of uses, including institutional (county facilities and a potential partnership with Renton Technical College), commercial (retail and office), and high-density residential, to facilitate redevelopment of the site. The property is currently the location of the King County Public Health facility for the Southeast District. The building is too small for current department needs. There is a possibility that the Dental Services facility could be relocated from its present location in Downtown Renton and be co-located with Public Health in a new structure. Several social service entities and the Renton Technical College have discussed, with the Public Health department, the possibility of locating operations at this site. fu addition, a private developer for residential use may be invited to participate in the project. At this time, discussion of a potential project is preliminary however, so maximum flexibility is desired by the property owner. RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY Redesignation to Employment Area -Commercial with Commercial Arterial zoning is recommended. BACKGROUND The Site The 4.73 acre property, at 3001 NE 4th Street, was annexed into the City of Renton in 1966. The land use designation is Center fustitution. It is zoned Light fudustrial with a 'P' suffix (public notification required for change of use). There is an existing, II,OOO-square foot building on the site that is too small for the King County Public Health Department needs and structurally unsound in terms of potential seismic factors. The King County park maintenance shops are located to the south ofthe health facility on a 17.2-acre parcel. King County intends to redevelop the Shops property for a new regional communications and emergency coordination center. Map Amendment #2003-M-02 Page 2 of7 The Surrounding Area Staff Recommendation 08/08/03 Existing land use in the surrounding area is multi-family residential to the north and commercial to the east. Office buildings and a self-service storage facility are under construction to the west. The land use designations are Employment Area-Commercial to the north, Employment Area- Commercial and Residential Options to the east, Employment Area -Industrial to the west, and Center Institution to the south. The current zouing is Commercial Arterial (CA) to the north, CA and Residential 10 (R-IO) to the east, Light Industrial (IL) and Residential Multi-family-Infill (RM-I) to the west, and IL to the south. Environmental Conditions The area in the viciuity of the site has a history of commercial gravel extraction and use as a landfill. A gravel pit was excavated to an approximate depth of 60 feet below the existing grade. It is known to have been located to the west, but its limits in relation to the King County property, are unknown. The excavation was subsequently backfilled with both a relatively small amount of demolition waste, including ash and waste material from World War II housing projects, and clean fill material. Some material deposited on site consisted of "uncontrolled fill." There are no records of waste disposal practices employed on the site during filling operations. Geotechnical investigation on the property abutting to the west indicates that native soils and debris- laden or incinerated garbage fill material were deposited on the site. The study resulted in the opiuion that the existing fill soils were Wlsuitable for supporting permanent structures, unless they were designed as lightweight buildings, such as manufactured housing. Lightweight structures would require periodic re-Ieveling. The report recommended removal of approximately eleven feet of the incinerated fill and replacement with compacted fill prior to development of the area, even for lightweight structures. Similar geotechnical study will be required on the King County property prior to site planuing. ANALYSIS Assuming that potential environmental constraints could be mitigated, the proposed uses, commercial and multi-family residential, would seem appropriate for the neighborhood. Due to the configuration of both land and development in this area, traffic is routed from the East Renton Plateau to the rest of the City by means ofNE 3n1 and NE 4th streets almost exclusively. Due to the resulting high volume of traffic that passes by the property, a development with a mix of uses, such as retail, office, and possibly housing, could be appropriate for the site and would probably have a high rate of success. Residential use is allowed in the CA zone as attached units with ground-floorretail 1 commercial use. The residential density allowed in the CA zone is 20 dwelling uuits per net acre (du/a). Increasing the maximum density above that would require a zoning amendment. Typically, density calculations are based on net density, that is, land not included as critical areas, public and private streets, and land already developed for other uses. For mixed-use development, land used for non-residential development is added to the net developable residential land. This increases the residential density of the project. H:IEDNSPlComp PianlAmendments12oo3IKC Health Dept PropenylKC Health staff rpt 2oo3-M'()2.DOC 8/8/2003 \ Map Amendment #2003-M-02 Page 3 of7 Staff Recommendation 08/08/03 The possibility of rezoning the property to Center Suburban (CS) has been discussed. In terms of uses, both the CA and CS allow the same uses. The property does not lie within a Center Suburban Residential Demonstration District, so those conditions and bonuses do not apply. Development standards vary between CA and CS, however, as follows: Minimum lot size Minimum density Maximum density Maximum front setback Maximum gross floor area of any single commercial None None 20 dulac None use on a site None Maximum gross floor area of any single office use on a site None CS 25,000 sf 10 dula 20 dulac 15 feet 65,000 gsf (exceeding requires Cond Use Permit) 65,000 gsf (exceeding requires Cond Use Permit) In addition to the zoning development standards, the difference between development in the CA and that in the CS designation is that CA serves high-traffic-volume neighborhoods and the intention is for CS to provide goods and services to a larger service area. At this site, there is little or no commercial use on adjacent properties to support the concept of a "center." Another consideration is that in order to attract project financing for residential development, a private developer may need the ability to acquire the land for that portion of the project. In this case, the minimum lot size requirement of the CS zone could interfere with the potential necessity of a subdivision of the property. CAPACITY ANALYSIS Presently, the 4.73 acre site is zoned IL which, when used in Renton's formula for the King County Buildable Lands, results in a net acreage of 3.46 acres and would produce approximately 82 jobs. If the site were to be zoned CA, the formula produces a net acreage of 3.86. Assuming the Buildable Land net acreage in the CA designation, the residential capacity could be 77 du at a density of 20 dufnet acre. Site specific net density will vary and would need to be confirmed during deVelopment reVIew. It is premature to develop a capacity model since the various uses are unknown at the present time. Preliminary discussion, however, indicates that the following conceptual plan figures may be a starting point for determining future uses: Streets and open space Developable land Dwelling units (attached) Commercial space Public health facility (inc!. dental fac.) 0.73 acre 4.0 acre 80 du (20 dufA) 200,000 sf 20-25,000 sf H:IEDNSPlComp PlanlAmendmenls\2003IKC Health Dept PropcrtylKC Health staff rpt 2oo3·M'()2.DOC 8/812003 Map Amendment #2003-M-02 Page 4 of7 Staff Recommendation 08/08103 RTC Apprenticeship Center 50-90,000 sf (current size) RTC ESUBasic Education Program Community Health Centers Community Health Center & King County school facility COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPLIANCE 15-20,000 sf 30,000 sf 20-25,000 sf The [Comprehensive Plan Amendment] proposal shall demonstrate that the requested amendment is timely and meets at least one of the following criteria: I. The request supports the vision embodied in the Comprehensive Plan, or 2. The request supports the adopted business plan goals established by the City Council, or 3. The request eliminates conflicts with existing elements or policies, or 4. The request amends the Comprehensive Plan to accommodate new policy directives of the City Council. The application conforms with Item 1 (see Appendix A), as well as Item 2 of the above criteria, the Business Plan goal to "promote neighborhood revitalization." A. Review Criteria fOr Comprehensive Plan Amendments: 1. The request supports the vision embodied in the Comprehensive Plan, or 2. The request supports the adopted business plan goals established by the City Council, or 3. The request eliminates conflicts with existing elements or poliCies, or 4. The request amends the Comprehensive Plan to accommodate new policy directives of the City Council. ZONING CONCURRENCY Concurrent rezoning to CA is required. A change of zone requires compliance with the following criteria (RMC 4-9-180F): I. The proposed amendment meets the review criteria in RMC 4-9-020G; and 2. The property is potentially classified for the proposed zone being requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan; and 3. At least one of the following circumstances applies: a. The subject reclassification was not specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and area zoning; or H:IEDNSPlComp PlanlAmendmentsl2003lKC Health Dept PropertyIKC Health staffrpt 2003·M-02.DOC 81812003 Map Amendment #2003-M-02 Page 5 of7 Staff Recommendation 08/08/03 b. Since the most recent land use analysis or the area zoning of the subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted private development, or other circumstances affecting the subject property have Wldergone significant and material change. The application conforms to criteria I, 2, and 3a. CONCLUSION A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the designation from Center Institution to Employment Area -Commercial appears, upon analysis, to be appropriate for this property. The proposed redesignation would meet, or could meet over time, most of the Employment Area -Commercial objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan (see Appendix A). Development of the property for CA uses would not conflict with existing uses in the neighborhood. Redevelopment Wlder the conceptual scenario presented by the proponents would serve many purposes in the neighborhood including providing upgraded facilities for the Public Health Department and Renton Technical College. Commercial 1 retail could serve the residential neighborhood of the South Highlands and provide support to the Center located at NE 4th Street and Union Ave NE. H:\EDNSP\Comp PlanlAmendments12003IKC Health Dept PmpertyIKC Health staffrpt 2003-M.Q2.00c 81S12003 Map Amendment #2003-M-02 Page 60f7 Staff Recommendation 08/08/03 APPENDIX 'A' Site plans and proposed development should be consistent with the following criteria: Objective LU-AA: Provide for commercial uses requiring large amounts of land and/or high visibility and access to large volumes of automobile traffic in areas outside of Centers and the Center Downtown designations. The property, located in the NE 4110 Street corridor, is highly visible from large volumes of vehicular traffic. (meets the criterion) Policy LU-J68. Employment Area -Commercial designations should only be located on, and have access to, streets classified as major arterials or above. The property fronts on NE 4110 Street, which is classified as a principal arterial. (meets the criterion) Policy LU-J69. Individual parcels should be encouraged to consolidate to maximize flexibility of site design and reduce access points. There may be limited opportunity to consolidate parcels. It may be possible, however, since two parcels to the south, 17.2 acres and 40 acres, are both also owned by King County. Policy LU-170. Individual development projects should be encouraged to: a. minimize curb cuts and share access points, b. provide for internal circulation among adjacent parcels, c. share parkingjacilities, d. centralize signing, e. create a unified style of development, and f provide landscaping and streetscaping to soften visual impacts. These criteria should be met through the site design and Site Plan Review process. Policy LU-173. Residential development should generally not be allowed in this designation. The current mixed-use concept would include some residential. At this location, residential use is existing adjacent to the north and abutting to the west. A residential zone is located to the south. Residential in a mixed-use development would be appropriate at this location. Objective LU-BB: Ensure quality development in Employment Areas -Commercial. This criterion should be met through the site design and site plan review process. Policy LU-J74. Parking areas should be landscaped (including street trees, buffers, berms), especially along the roadways, to reduce the visual impacts. This criterion should be met through the site design and site plan review process. H:IEDNSPlComp PlanlAmendments12003\KC Health Dept Property\KC Health staff rpt200J.M~2.DOC 81812003 Map Amendment #2003-M-02 Page70f7 Staff Recommendation 08/08/03 Policy LV-175. Landscape buffers. additional setbacks. reduced height. and other screening devices should be employed to reduce the impacts (e.g. visual, noise. odor. light) on adjacent. less intensive uses. This critcrion should be met through the site design and Site Plan Review process. Po/icy LV-176. Increased demandfor commercial uses should be accommodated through redevelopment and intensification of Employment Area -Commercial designations rather than expansion of those areas. Although this proposal is a limited expansion of the EA-C designation, it is not a reaction to increased demand for commercial uses, but rather a response to a public need to redevelop the property with financial assistance from the private sector. The ability to develop a mix of uses would be an advantage. Po/icy LV-I 77. Special design considerations (e.g. landscape. streetscape. signage, bUilding design) should be encouraged for areas which are deSignated as gateways for the city. This area has not been designated as a gateway for the City. Po/icy LV-178. Retail and/or service uses should comprise a majority of the total development within Employment Area -Commercial designations. The mix of uses has not been determined. Policy LV-179. A unifiedform of commercial development should be encouraged through site standards, including: a. minimum lot depth of 200 feet, b. maximum height of 4-6 stories, c. parking to the side or rear of the building. d. maximum setbacks which will allow incorporating a landscape buffer, and e. common signage and lighting requirements. This criterion could be met through the site design and site plan review process. Policy LV-180. Public amenity features (e.g. parks. plazas, recreation areas), beyond those required for the mitigation of adverse environmental impacts, should be encouraged as part of every development. This criterion should be met through the site design and site plan review process. Policy LV-lSI. Development should be designed to be compatible with adjacent, less intensive uses, e.g. lighting, fences, landscaping, setbacks should all be considered during site design. This criterion should be met through the site design and Site Plan Review process. H:IEDNSPlComp PlanlAmendments\2003IKC Health Dept PropertylKC Health staffrpt 2003·M-02.DOC 81812003 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all govemmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse Impacts on the . quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency Identify Impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid Impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic Information about your proposal. Govemmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental Impacts of your proposal are Significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask; about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse Impact. - USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for non project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply.' IN ADDITION, comptete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For non project actions (actions involving decisions on poliCies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project: "applicant: and 'property or site' should be read as "proposal," "proposer." and "affected geographic area," respectively. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DEC I 7 '--~ RECEIVeD EIwIi ... ,ooi .... ~ A. BACKGROUND 1 , Name of proposed project, if applicable: Zo02 ~~·I..IJ ~/(J(.~A~ 2, Name of applicant: ~cf~ 3, _Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 4. lOSS ~~~~ ~ 'tCOS'6" Date checklist prepared: ~u,...e.t¥l l2/n/OI 5. Agency requesting checklist: ~fi.~ 6. Proposed timing or schedule (Including phasing, if applicable): 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 8. List any environmental Information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. ~ef~ ~tt.'Pw... fiMl el~ ~ '''4~ ~ 1If~ ~U\f~' ~",~ ~IS 144.1'\15 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for govemmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. JlJA.. 10. List any govemmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, If known. ~ 11. Glvlt brief, complete deSCfiption of your proposal, Including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. ~c.. ~ '"flttel 2 '. , ( 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient Information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed projed, including a street address, if any, and sedion, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal deScription, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. ~ wi4 ~ -ro.t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I'tYlf ttff&It1W1e1ris B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH ~A. a. General description of the Site (circle one); flat, rolling,hillY,steep slopes, mountainous, . other _____ _ b. What Is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) ~ c. What general types of SOils are found on the site (for example, ciay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them· and note any prime farmland. ~ d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the Immediate vicinity? If so, describe·lJ.t\ e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. tJA f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construdion, or use? If so, generally describe.~ g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after projed construdlon (for example, asphalt or buildings)? tuA h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impads to the earth, If any: AA 3 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the elr would result from the proposal O.e., dust, automobile, odors, Industrial wood smoke) during conslluction and when the proJed is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities If known. ~ b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. ~ c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other Impacts to air, If any"" 3. WATER "'" a. Surface Water: 1) Is there anyjSilrface water body on or In the Immediate vicinity of the ,site {including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,ponds,wetlands)? If yes" describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows Into. JJA. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the desa1bed waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.tJA 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed In or removed from surface water or wetlands and Indicate the area of the site that would be affeded. Indicate the source of fill material. )JA 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. ~ 5) Does the proposal lie within a 1 OO-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan.~ 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. ~ 4 EowfiOiN.l8iilal CheeIckI b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description. purpose, and approximate quantities If known. ~ 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged Into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; Industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agriCUltural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served Cif applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. C. Water Runoff (including storm water): NA 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm wale" and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe1JA. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: ..... 4. PLANTS "'" a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: __ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other __ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs __ grass __ pasture __ crop or grain __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation b. What klnd and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? c. list threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: 5 eJ ....... , ..... ChecIdW 6. ANIMALS tJA a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other ______ _ Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other -:--::-______ _ Fish: bass, salmon, trout, henlng, shellfish, other _____ _ b. Ust any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, If any: 6. ENERGY AND NA11URAL RESOURCES tJA a. What kinds of energy (electriC, natural gas, oil, wood stove, sola!? will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will b8 used Jor heating, manufacturing, etc. b. Would your project affect the potential.use of solar energy byadjacenl properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are Included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, If any: 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH J.JA a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be reqUired. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, If any: 6 • Environmental Checklist b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffiC, equipment, operation, other)? 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours nOise would come from the site. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? .5ec.. trbkcr.e,t 'lShett b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. ~ c. Describe any structures on the site.OI\ d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? AJ.\ e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? ~ ~ i4M f. What is the current comprehensive plan deSignation of the site? Set, att4C1teJ 1Ittit g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program c ~~;ignation of the Site? HA. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an 'environmentall~' 5ensitive" area? If so, specify .1J\ i. Approximately how many people would reside or work. in the completed project? Al1\ 7 • Environmental Checklist 9. ',0. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: ", HOUSING .' a. ~0~~~~~~1~":lo~~~~~~~~~ middle, or I?,*,income housing. ~'*' Cl.-M.Lj ~.,.of ~ fii~' onl ~ J)eS~llW lI\~ 6M1 ~ 'fAA Ut.t.t rt.dJJ«, ll<Siduotl.1 I ~,~ 0U1-1 woor'ProptfflS:-[aUd (aJtliwAkNJfJ,.IIJWfIJJJ6f#rJusiM. b. ,1,{pproximateIY how many units, if"ny, would be eliminated? iiidiCate~ether highY middle, or low-in~me hOUSing·~ttct Q~ ·~oftuUts wid klf~J c. aJ1»'t ~ ~,(JtDrI. ~ "'It llV.M. ~'''1 Ob~It,~ ~ lit 01-11-1 a"fD'H1-'1. "1fpl,ablh--. ~'J1-Z~ 1tt4:fiM~ ~i.it· Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Mlai", fuJ1s '4{l.~ AESTHETICS l)A a. What Is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not ihcluding antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstruUed? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 11. LIGHT AND GLARE tJ.A. a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? 8 12. 13. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? ~ d. Proposed measures to reduce or controllighl and glare Impacts, If any: ~ b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses?, If so, describe~ c. Proposed measures to reduce or control Impacts on recreation, including recreation~ opportunitieS'to be provided by the project or applicant, ,if any: HISTORIC AND '?l!LTU~L PR~SERVATION~ _:fi':'P'!Jtet ~: ~. li'mPlf'. !.rlM~~:!i~~ ~~~ct:Sli~t~~ for,~l;fPonafJfa\~_.~t1r: preservation registers known to be on or nexl to the site? If so, generally describe. ~ b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. A'A. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, If any: ~ 14. TRANSPOR1~~I~N ItlUlnlOVl (IN}. lJlpm( f~ f~ -Ivle rtviet«tl ~~~I~niimLtm~etg aiirh~wa~~, ~n~~sed access to lRwaf~';:;~;yste:;;;;;;;ifany .• ~ ~l= 'Cd. . ~ 1Jl.{) I'tYlk( -foL UG 4.x4 ~lf'\CUtlidDllljllllilltlt.f-&t. ~~ It\ D'Z-M.&./ ~tJtit'I1T'{~ b. Is site currentiy served by public transii'?i~ not, ~{/~e approximate distance~ "l2ll ), nearest transit stop? ~ r~ ¥.fj(.-tr~"'P\ l~~:~.t.r ~~ O~-~-I WDOr"ftlbd'PJ 1 will ktfl.t~ w ~*' 'iibtrII~ 0'2-~·1 tL1)& ttUwu: c. Ho";g'a'ny parking spaces would the completed project have? How marif wouldiiir' project eliminate? ~ 9 d. Will the proposal requlra any new roads or streets, or Improvements to existing roads or streets, not Including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? ~ e. Will the project use (or occur In the Immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe~ f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, Indicate when peak volumes would occur. ~ g. Proposed measures to reduca or'control transportation Impacts, If any: ~ 15. PUBUC SERVICES (Nt14. fPaLrrte ~ .fo-be.. retJl~ It)?ct 'If ""C'~d re:a~ r~tjf\~s!.'t~~bnC services (for example: fire protection, polica protection;heaHh care, schools, other)? .If so"generelly describe. b. Proposed meesures to reduce or control direct Impacts on public services, if any. ~ 16. UTIUTIES trrl Ur'Il6 a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septiC system, other. ~ b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the Site or in the Immediate vicinity which might be needed. "'A - c. SIGNATURE . I, the, undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead' agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue In reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on, my part. Proponent: Name Printed: _'Rd>m.~o!LBB..~ll..!OlA:!:' rri.ld.. _____ _ Date: ~. n ,'2W) 10 • D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than If the proposal were. not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water;· emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or. production of noise? ().A 2. 3. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: How would the proppsal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? ~li~ in-'-1-D¥: ~ W. ¥Uclli redudr1) dIb.'op"LIfi/ ~ ~(, 6441~"P~ fM~ tuWtL, ~Ot\tZN~~_~ Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: (etUs ~Bn l)'2.-M-OI ~~(T~AJ.l8WtJ. ~ ~..t HOWWOuldt~~~'~d~~e~~t~~r$ ~ Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cuitural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? - Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? 'Thl5 ~lld(t ~W\ l'Dt1f~~ ~-k 0JtNtU ~.s'ff.litJn VI'J~ ~ ~l~1 ~·II.r~ .Is. . Proposed measur~ to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use Impacts are: 11 " 6. How would the proposal be likel}< to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? ~Cf4~. ~t~~~-be.~ -tM~~ 4.~~ ~ ~~/11 deIwnL"a:,,,,,. ~,IJtIttHl\OIWitW of 1.';.1 • ~~M ~(Itl.atdAlStdJ4<tJttt~ -bh~r fWt,f I~ D~ -. p;'oposed measures to reduce or respond ~toS6Eh demandlsj are: ""ft;' ~ 7. Identify, If possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local,state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environmenlllriht. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge' the above ,information, 'Is true and complete. It Is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might Issue In rellanca upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: OUtuJJJmi Name Printed: &bam,., Li rrJ Dale: ENVCHLST .DOC REVISEO 8/IIa D:t.. n, '2401 12 • • ~------------------. t " .... "_ '-, I - - o -:; , _ ,-' • , _ r -, NAME: PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION and Zip Code: ADDRESS: '055 jcufJ... I""~ CITY:~ IbI\ ZIP: <1f!oS'~ KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): TELEPHONE NUMBER: ~ ~1J). "t;tlfJ CR. t,rJ) JJA. ~--------------------------~ EXISTING LAND USE(S): S!r, att~ ~ NAME: PROPOSED LAND USE(S): 5t£ att~ 5Itt.tt COMPANY (if applicable): COIMPI~E~iENISI\i'E PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: 1...pIROI'O~;ED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION ~ __________ ~~~~dc~~~~I~~); CITY: ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER -- - ----II ~--~~.~\ , , ' , 'l\. ,~.' \; I . "-----~ ~ .~-~-- COMPANY ~f applicable): ADDRESS:~ CITY: ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: masterap.doc Revised April 2001 EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING (if apPlicable):&t, SITE AREA (in square feet): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING THREE LOTS OR MORE (if applicable): PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (~applicable): NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): ; "~ , ' \ l ( , I~, ~, i I • , I J ;, I • ~. , L ______ .~_ ._~ __ .~ _ _ _ "_ .... _~ _ ~'w _. ___ ~ ___ ~_~ ___ • _ • _~ • _ _ __ __ _ SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): ~ PROJECT VALUE: ~ SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): KlI\. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): BUILDINGS (if applicable): lOA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (rt applicable): ~ NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): ~ NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): .. I\A. _ ANNEXATION (A) $ _ COMP PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) $ ----• _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CLl-A, CU-H) $ _ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (ECF) $ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT (GF) $ (No. CU. Yds: $ _REZONE(R) $ ROUTINE VEGETATION $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT (RVMP) _ SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-A. SA-H) $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT (SP) $ _ TEMPORARY PERMIT (TP) $ _ VARIANCE (V-A, V-H, V-8) $ (from Section: $ _WAlVER~) $ OTHER: $ o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA lWO o FLOOD HAZARD AREA o GEOLOGIC: HAZARD o HABITAT CONSERVATION o SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES o WETLANDS SHOREUNE REVIEWS _ CONDITIONAL USE (SM-C) $ _ EXEMPTION (SME) $ _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT (SM) $ _ VARIANCE (SM-V) $ SUBDMSION _ BINDING SITE PLAN (BSP) $ _ FINAL PLAT (FP) $ _ LOT UNE ADJUSTMENT (LLA) $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT (PP) $ _ SHORT PLAT (SHPL-A. SHPL-H) $ Postage: $ TOTAL FEE $ ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. NOQHARGE I, (Print Name) , declare lhat I am (please check one) _!he current owner of the property Involved In this appilcaUon or __ the authorized representative to act for a oorporaUon (please aUsch proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the InfonnaUon herewith are In all respects true and correct to !he best of my knowledge and belief. (Name of Owner/Representative) ~ (Signature of Owner/Represenlative) maslerap.doc Revised April 200 1 I certify that I know or have sallsfactory evidence that signed this Instrument and acknowledged it to be hislhe--:rfthej,....,.·r-;tree-a-n""'dC"voi-,:-un"Cla-ry-a-ct7Cfor.,..,- the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrumenl Notary Public in and for the Slate of Washington Notary (Prtnt)' ____________ _ My appoinbnent expires: _________ _ DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM 12118/01 City Staff Andree DeBauw/<9 LUA OI-167,R ,ECFlKing County DOH Rezone This file has been given an LUA # but there is no material for the file. It has not been routed at the request of Rebecca Lind. Project Manager. H:\DIVISION .S\DEVEWP.SER\DEV &PLAN,ING\Ad\Memos\PW MEMO.doc\cor