Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA-04-043_Report 1LAND USE APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Robert Wilson FILE No.: PROJECT NAME: PROPERTY LOCATION: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: N/A HEARING EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION: N/A REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION: Date Received: Response: APPEAL: Date Received: Date Response: CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: Date of Approval: Ordinance/Resolution No.: Date of Ordinance/Resolution: MYLAR TO COUNTY FOR RECORDING: Date: Mylar Recording: CROSS REFERENCES: OTHER REMARKS: 4A L 7 C �5 7�,,7, LL9 @ ❑ PgAtCtMV ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ rm �77 ❑ ❑ MACtMC- ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ P 1cC4 LLI, 7 LL10 7D 1-7 0 KACtZL- 0 L'i L-1 0 Mctav cl LL� 0 L CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: May 15, 2017 To: City Clerk's Office From: Gillian Syverson Subject: Land Use File Closeout 1 Please complete the following information to facilitate protect closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: LORD GARAGE & ADDITION LUA (file) Number: LUA04-043, ECF, V -H, S -V Cross -References: N/A AKA's: N/A Project Manager: Vanessa Dolbee Acceptance Date: April 14, 2004 Applicant: Robert Wilson Owner: Lisa Lord; Port of Seattle Contact; Robert Wilson PID Number: 3124059077, 3342103715, 3124059004 ERC Determination: N/A Date: N/A Appeal Period Ends: N/A Administrative Decision: N/A Date: N/A Appeal Period Ends: N/A Public Hearing Date: N/A Date Appealed to HEX: N/A By Whom: N/A HEX Decision: N/A Date: N/A Appeal Period Ends: N/A Date Appealed to Council: N/A By Whom: Council Decision: N/A Date: N/A Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: SHORELINE VARIANCE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW EXISTING HOUSE ON LAKE WASHINTON FOR APX 744 SQ FT ADDITION AND 700 SQ FT DETACHED GARAGE. TWO VARIANCES ARE REQUIRED FOR SETBACK AND A 2 STORY DETACHED GARAGE. 1-2014 update: This application was never accepted as complete. File sent to Clerk's Office. See also C99-0118 and CO2 -0648. Location: 3307 Mountain View Ave N, Renton, WA 98056 Comments: This project was closed due to code enforcement Issues. ERC De erml a to es: DNS — Determination of Nan -Significance; DNS -M — Determination of Non -Significance -Mitigated; DS — Determination of Significance. 455 W `"229-24-5 & E %231-24-5 RENTON r: i �J2 i Gov't. Lot ,' I 10.15 AC KENNYDALE r: BEACH PARK ! I t r 14 r ! R 35T is I E APS; I 2E r _ _ _ 1620 �? 1 18 ��0 O —__ —�• 1 ..Z 3 � I Q� 22 ,r` r N. 34T 24 1E 25 ad z —� .26 r• Zr 27 _ 25 7 8 ti L1--- • 30 t /!. 9. n DO iE Nor SLIP 33z,• _ YM1041 q 3 2 i _ - 36 WHARF S1 K NNYD SLIP Ell 20' (§§§§ G e;K) 22.E m §m]; - §- $ � a� / ! ! � } / , � • - \ _ , 9 \ ' � t . w (§§§§ G e;K) 22.E §m]; - §- � ULT- Z � 8I Tip. I I I W Q m MW Am ii Ch m mr, ! w i J i E LL - 7 � • I L" 0 T co 0II m E. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY IMF— o°f AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT �5ft= 8 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: March 13, 2013 TO: Pre -Application File No. 13-000261 FROM: Rocale Timmons, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Lord Short Plat— 3307 Mountain View Ave N General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre -application for the above - referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre -application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision -makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Community & Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator, Planning Director, Development Services Director, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall or online at www.rentonwa.gov Project Proposal: The subject property is located between Mountain View Ave and Lake Washington at 3307 Mountain View Ave N. The applicant is proposing a three lot short plat of the 33,514 square foot site located within the R-8 zoning designation. The Lake Washington Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) encroaches onto the property approximately 12,600 square feet. Access for the proposed lots would be provided via an existing 20 -foot wide easement extended from Lake Washington Blvd across railroad property. The proposed lots are intended for the eventual development of detached single-family homes. Current Use: An existing single family residence is proposed to remain on Lot 2. Zoning/Density Requirements: The subject property is located within the R-8 zoning designation. The density range allowed in the R-8 zone is a minimum of 4.0 to a maximum of 8.0 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). The area of public and private streets and critical areas would be deducted from the gross site area to determine the "net" site area prior to calculating density. The net density for the 3 -lot proposal would be 6.3 du/acre, after deduction area for private access easements and critical area, which would fall within the permitted density range of the R-8 zone. Development Standards: The proposal is located within the Shoreline jurisdiction; Lake Washington Reach -D within the. Shoreline regulations shall apply as an overlay and in addition to development regulations, h:\ced\pIanning\current plan ning\preapps\13-000261.rocale\13-000261 (r-8 lord shpl, shoreline).doc Lord Short Plat, PRE13-000261 Page 2of5 March 14, 2013 including but not limited to zoning, environmental regulations, development standards, subdivision regulations, and other regulations established by the City. In the event of any conflict between shoreline policies and regulations and any other regulations of the City, shoreline policies and regulations shall prevail unless other regulations provide greater protection of the shoreline natural environment and aquatic habitat. Minimum Lot Size Width and Depth —The minimum lot size permitted in the R-8 is 4,500 square feet for parcels greater than 1 acre in size and 5,000 square feet for lots 1 acre or less in size. The total lot area of the subject site is less than 1 acre; therefore a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet is applicable to the proposed project. A minimum lot width of 50 feet for interior lots and 60 feet for corner lots, as well as a minimum lot depth of 65 feet, is also required. Proposed Lot 3 does not comply with the lot size requirements of the zone. The proposal would be required to be revised, to eliminate proposed Lot 3 as it does not meet the lot size requirements for the zone. Alternatively, the applicant may request and have approved an administrative variance to create a lot that does not meet lot size standards. It does not appear that the proposal would meet the criteria necessary to approve a lot size variance. Setbacks — Setbacks are governed by underlying zoning in chapter 4-2 RMC except in cases where specific shoreline performance standards provide otherwise. The required setbacks in the R-8 zone are 1S feet in front for the primary structure and 20 feet in front for the attached garage, 20 feet in the rear, 5 feet on interior side yards, and 15 feet on side yards along streets (including access easements.but not shared driveways) for the primary structure and 20 feet on side yards along streets (including access easements but not shared driveways) for the attached garage. Variance from the front and side yard standards maybe granted administratively if needed to meet the established setback from OHWM, as specified in this Section and if standard variance criteria are met. All new residential lots shall meet vegetation conservation provisions including the full required buffer area together with replanting and control of invasive species within buffers to ensure establishment and continuation of a vegetation community characteristic of a native climax community. Each lot must be able to support intended development without encroachment on vegetation conservation areas. Shorelines_ shall have a minimum one hundred foot_ 1100'] vegetation management buffer measured Lrom the OHWM of the regulated shoreline of the State. The applicant may request, along with the acceptance of a standard stream or lake study, the Administrator approve a reduction in the standard buffer widths/setbacks by up to4twenty five percent (25%). Buffer enhancement shall be required where appropriate to site conditions, habitat sensitivity, and proposed land development characteristics. The proposal does not contain adequate area to comply with the required, or potentially reduced, setback requirements of the Shoreline Master Program. As a result. the Proposal for subdivision would not be supported. The applicant may choose to request and must have approved, a Shoreline Variance in order to subdivide the Property for which the Hearing Examiner shall have authority to grant. it should be noted that all Shoreline Variance permits are forwarded to the Department a1 Ecology and the Attorney General's office for approves! or denial. For the existing residencellot the following vegetation buffers and building setbacks shall apply without a variance. Lot depth shall be measured from the DWWM in a perpendicular direction to h:�ced\p Ian ning\c urrent planning\preapps\13-OD0261.rocale\13-000261 (r-8 lord shpt, shoreline).doc Lord Short Plat, PRE13-0002di Page 3 of 5 March 14, 2013 the edge of the contiguously owned parcel or to an easement containing existing physical improvements for road access for two (2) or more lots. Lot Depth Building Setback Vegetated Buffer Less than 100 feet 25 feet 10 feet Building Standards – Up to five percent (5%) impervious surface is allowed in vegetation conservation buffers/setbacks for access to the shoreline, or a pathway up to six feet (6') wide, whichever is greater. In cases where the depth of the vegetation conservation buffer/setback is modified, that portion of the first one hundred feet (100') from OHWM upon which development is to be located is permitted a maximum of fifty percent (50%) impervious surface. If the buffer depth is modified, that portion of the first one hundred feet (100') from OHWMMf f� r�,,t upon which development is to be located shall be permitted up to 25% lot coverage. "—a Building height is restricted to 30 feet from existing grade for the R-8 zone. However, up to 35 feet is allowed for single-family residences subject to the shoreline master program. If the maximum allowed height in the underlying zoning is less than the maximum allowed height in the shoreline overlay, a non -shoreline variance from the standards in chapter 4-2 RMC must be obtained from the Administrator to allow any height over the amount allowed in the underlying zone. Detached accessory structures must remain below a height of 15 feet. The gross floor area must be less than that of the primary structure. Accessory structures are also included in building lot coverage calculations. The proposal's compliance with the building standards would be verified at the time of building permit review for the new residences to be located on all lots. Access/Parking: Access to site is proposed via an existing 20 -foot wide access easement. Each lot is required to accommodate off street parking for a minimum of two vehicles. Driveways: The maximum driveway slopes cannot exceed 15%, provided that driveways exceeding 8% are to provide slotted drains at the lower end of the driveway. If the grade exceeds 15%, a variance is required. Building Design Standards – All single family residences would be subject to the Residential Design Standards outlined in RMC 4-2-115. The proposal's compliance with the residential design standards would be verified at the time of building permit review for the new residences. Please take note of the following standards One of the following is required: Lot width variation of 10 feet (10') minimum of one per four (4) abutting street -fronting lots, or • Minimum of four (4) lot sizes (minimum of four hundred (400) gross square feet size difference) for at least every four (4) abutting street fronting lots, or h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\13-000261.rocale\13-000261(r-8 lord shpt, shoreline).doc Lord Short Plat, PRE13-000261 Page 4 of S March 14, 2013 • A front yard setback variation of at least five feet (5') minimum for at least every four (4) abutting street fronting lots. Docks - All new subdivisions shall record a prohibition on new private docks on the face of the plat. An area reserved for shared moorage may be designated if it meets all requirements of the Shoreline Master Program including demonstration that public and private marinas and other boating facilities are not sufficient to meet the moorage needs of the subdivision. Landscaping — Except for critical areas, all portions of the development area not covered by structures, required parking, access, circulation or service areas, must be landscaped with native, drought -resistant vegetative cover. The development standards require that all pervious areas within the property boundaries be landscaped. The minimum on-site landscape width required along street frontages is 10 feet. Please refer to landscape regulations (RMC 4-4-070) for further general and specific landscape requirements (enclosed). The conceptual landscape plan submitted with the pre -application materials is required to be revised to include a 10 -foot wide on-site landscape strip on each lot. Significant Tree Retention: If significant trees (greater than 6 -inch caliper) are proposed to be removed a tree inventory and a tree retention plan along with a tree retention worksheet shall be provided with the formal land use application. The tree retention plan must show preservation of at least 30 percent of significant trees, and indicate how proposed building footprints would be sited to accommodate preservation of significant trees that would be retained. If the trees cannot be retained, they may be replaced with minimum 2 inch caliper trees at a ratio of six to one. Environmental Review: Environmental (SEPA) Review is required for projects that contain critical areas. Therefore SEPA would be required for the proposed subdivision. Permit Requirements: The proposed subdivision would require Short Plat Approval, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, Shoreline Variance, Environmental (SEPA) Review and possible administrative variances for building height, lot size, and/or setbacks not associated with the shoreline. All land use permits would be processed within an estimated time frame of 16 weeks. The Short Plat Review application fee is $1,400. The application fee for the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit is $2,000, the fee for the Shoreline Variance is $2,000 and the application fee for SEPA Review (Environmental Checklist) is $1,000. Any Administrative Variance would have a fee of $1,200. A 3% technology fee would also be assessed at the time of land use application. Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal is provided in the attached handouts. . Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction fees, the following impact fees would be required prior to the recording of the plat. The following are current fees and are likely to be increased in 2014: • A Fire Mitigation fee of $488.00 per new single family residence. • A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project; and h:\ced\planning\current plan ning\preapps\13-000261.rocale\13-000261 (r-8 lord shpl, shoreline).doc Lord Short Plat, PRE13-000261 Page 5of5 March SA, 2013 A Parks Mitigation Fee based on $530.76 per new single family residence. A School District Impact Fee based on $6,392 per new single family residence. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees in attached for your review. Expiration: The short plat approval is valid for two years with a possible one-year extension. h:\ced\planning\current plan ning\preapps\13-000261.rocale\13-000261 (t-8 lord shpl, shoreline).doc As Y O� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY + rfti + AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: January 27, 2009 TO: Paul Baker FROM: Neil Watts �Cq/ SUBJECT: 3307 Mountain Vie -vi, Av N SR08-1841 At Donna's request, 1 have reviewed the above listed service request, and have determined that the appropriate action is to close out this case as completed for code enforcement purposes. Any violations that may have occurred at this address would be impossible to document for legal action at this time. if there were setback violations we would not be able to prove in a court of law that these actions have occurred under recent land use regulations. Similarly with any building construction that may ]lave occurred Without building permits. The house and site do not appear to be currently under any type of construction action, and any reported actions occurred many years ago with limited documentation, As the case was closed by the code enforcement inspector in 2001, and no illegal actions have been observed or reported since that date, our most reasonable action on this case is to return it to closed status. cc: ]ermifer Henning Donna Locher Laureen Nicolay - Lisa Lord/Mountain nstruction without permits or variance,. From: Laureen Nicolay To: Henning, Jennifer Date: Thursday, April 13, 2006 1:11:08 PM Subject: Lisa Lord/Mountain View Construction without permits or variances You will be getting a call from the Lord family wondering why their permit is taking so long and expressing concern about the new shoreline setbacks. A little history: 2002 complaint about construction without necessary permits or variances on Lake Washington. See CO2 -0648. 2003 -Mid 2004 --No action taken by applicant or City to rectify violation Mid 2004 --Applicant finally turns in terribly inadequate land use application while Laureen out office. 200412005 --Multiple requests by planner to have complete application submitted. Land use application stili not accepted as complete. No code enforcement sanctions were ever given. Mid 2005 --Bob retires and changes status of violation to "closed" for some reason. Mid 2006 --Lord family calls and wonders why permit not ready. Mid 2006--Laureen corrects status of violation to "open". To date, this applicant has been given an exceptional 4 -year hiatus from code enforcement. I don't know what happened with this one. Laureen Nicolay City of Renton Development Services 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Phone_ (425) 430-7294 Pax: (425) 430-7231 Inicolay@ci.renton.wa.us CC: Baker, Paul; Kamcheff, Marilyn f✓I OUAJAL, CODE COW U- gf4 e DATE OF INVESTIGATION OCTOBER 9, 2002. G02.- 6�ag BUILDING DECK AND OTHER APPERTANENCE STRUCTURES TO PRIMARY RESIDENCE WITHOUT ANY BUILDING OR ELECTRICAL PERMITS. WORK BEING DONE IS WITHIN THE SHORELINE SETBACK OF LAKE WASHINGTON. EXTENSIVE LANDSCAPING HAS ALREADY BEEN COMPLETED WITHIN THE SHORELINE SETBACK INCLUDING DEPOSITING GRAVEL ONTO THE SHORELING INCLUDING EXTENDING THE GRAVEL INTO THE WATERS OF LAKE WASHINGTON. NOTICE AND ORDER ISSUED OCTOBER 11, 2002 TO LISA LORD. ALL ACTIVITY IS TO CEASE AND DESIST UNTIL ALL PERMITS INCLUDING SHORELINE EXEMPTION APPLICATION IS APPROVED AND ISSUED. THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE SHORELINE VIOLATION IS REFERENCED IN ORDINANCE 4716 SECTON 2.02.01. PREVIOUS ACTIVITY C-99-0118, INVOLVED SIMILAR VIOLATIONS. FISH AND WILDLIFE HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED FOR THEIR ACTION AND ENFORCEMENT IF NECESSARY. CITY .)F RENTON „u PianningtBuilding/PublicWorks Department x by Keolicer-Wheeler, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator August 27, 2004 Lisa and Mark Lord 3307 Mtn. View Ave. N. Renton, WA 98056 Subject: Lord Garage/Addition Variances LUA-04-043, ECF, V -H, SV Dear Lisa and Mark Lord: I am sending this letter to request the submittal of the items outlined in the City's correspondences to you dated May 7 and August 6, 2004. Due to the code violations associated with your site, a land use application requesting variances was required to be applied for. The land use application was submitted on April 14, 2004 and was determined to be an incomplete submittal. The above referenced letters, which are enclosed, outline the required information needed to continue processing the application. Our records indicate there has been no correspondence or activity related to the project for over four months from you. The information is necessary to accept and process the application and must be submitted no later than September 17, 2004; to my attention. If we have not received the information by that date, we will assume that you do not wish to proceed with the Variances; thus the City will continue to pursue code enforcement. The failure to comply with the City of Renton Municipal Code will result in referring your file to Code Enforcement for further litigation. This will include the issuance of a citation. We wish to work with you to process the land use application submittal. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7382. Sincerely, Susan Fiala, AICD Senior Planner Enclosures cc: Project File Jennifer Henning Bob Arthur ou K Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 R E 1V 1 0 1 V ® This paper contains 50% recycled mnterial, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE tAs CITY )F RENTON �_ P1anni 0u11( n0ubhcWorks Department L hy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator August 3, 2004 Lisa and Mark Lord 3307 Mtn. View Ave. N. Renton, WA 98056 Subject: Lord Garage/Addition Variances LUA-04-043, ECF, V -M, SV Dear Lisa and Mark Lord: This letter is to request a written update on the status of the preparation of the variances' written justifications as outlined in my correspondence to you dated May 7, 2004. 1 am also providing you with further information concerning the issue of a "legal lot". City staff has determined that a legal lot for your property under your sole ownership does not exist. In order to create a legal lot, either a lot line adjustment or a short plat would be required. The BNSF Railroad and the titled owner of the property would need to process one of these land use applications. The neighborhood map provided does not show the surveyed property boundaries. The referenced Parcels A and B are not delineated on any of the submitted drawings. If two parcels abut each other, you could potentially process a lot line adjustment which would segregate your "home and land" from the railroad property. A property survey would be required as one of the submittals for a lot line adjustment. However, if only one parcel is involved, then a short plat of the land would be required. Therefore, it is the applicant's responsibility to determine what parcels are included by providing a property survey to City Staff for their review. Once the survey has been reviewed, the next step will be dependent on the number of parcels involved. It is also our understanding that the fill placed on the site is under enforcement by the WA State Department of Fish and Wildlife. What is the status of this issue? To reiterate, when the lot issue has been resolved, and written criteria justifications and the additional fee are received, staff will review for project completeness whereupon your application may be formally accepted and processed or you may be further requested to provide more information/justification. Please contact me at (425) 430-7382 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Susan Fiala, AICP Senior Planner cc: Project File Jennifer Henning out Grady Way - Renton, Washington 48055 ® This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30%post consumer RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 10`h day of May, 2004, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Notice of Incomplete application documents. This information was sent to: Neiine F..-; .. 1,. i I R. � � i I. �`;' ,_ `� . Re resehili I .`. (,,' Lisa & Mark Lord Owners ,gSION (Signature of Sender): o NOTAgk:V . CD STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ,, �,' USUrl SS 0 6.�� �. ..29.0 .•�y, COUNTY OF KING } �o WASN�xx, certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy M. Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Notao Public in and for the Sat ashington Notary (Print): My appointment expires: MyA ILY CNT � g 6-29-07 Prolect Name,., Lord Garage/Addition Variances Project Number: LUA04-043, ECF, V -H, SV template - affidavit of service by mailing CITY G RENTON 7 Planning/Building/PubNeWorks Department Kathy Keoiker-Wheeler, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator May 7, 2004 Lisa and Mark Lord 3307 Mtn. View Ave. N. Renton, WA 98056 Subject: Lord Garage/Addition Variances LUA-04-044, ECF, V -H, SV Dear Lisa and Mark Lord: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is incomplete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is not accepted for review. The following outlines the issues remaining to be addressed and some of the additional information required to process your application: 1) The neighborhood map provided does not show the surveyed property boundaries. The referenced Parcels A and B are not delineated. A property survey may be required. Staff has not fully determined this at this time. 2) The title report does not indicate that you are the owner of the property. It states that you have a fee simple estate for Parcel A and an easement estate for Parcel B of which neither parcel is clearly identified on the submitted drawings. 3) As stated in the Pre -Application materials File No. Pre 03-064: Under the Building Height discussion, it was stated that the mezzanine level in the garage is considered a story and thus the garage exceeds the single story limitation. The pre -application continues to state that the proposal must be revised to comply with this requirement. Based on the materials submitted for the variances, the proposal continues to include the second story. Thus, a variance from RMC4-2-110.6. is required. 4) There are three variances being requested:1) A variance to the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting regulations; 2) A Shoreline Variance for setbacks; and 3) A detached accessory unit variance to the number of stories permitted that being one story. The materials submitted do not provide the necessary written justification outlined for each criteria for each of the three variances. Under the variance criteria discussion, the criterion was outlined for the Land Clearing/Tree Cutting Variance and .Shoreline Variance. However, the submittal provides very little written justification. It is the applicant's burden to provide detailed written justification for the variance criteria of RMC4-9-250B.5. for the Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Variance and for the Detached Accessory Use — Additional Story Variance (See Attachment A); and the criteria of RMC 4-9-190.1.4.b. for the Shoreline Variance (See Attachments B and C ). Please compose all written justifications with compelling reasons for each criteria for each variance. Staff strongly encourages the applicant to NOT repeat same verbiage of criteria. 5) With three variances being requested, the land use application fees would be charged for each variance. The fees submitted are for environmental review and two variances. An additional fee of $250 is required for the other variance requested. Please provide the additional fee at the time the requested justifications are submitted. hictilipletc-04 TAout Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 R E N T O N t9 This paper contains 50w recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE Lord Variances Page 2 of 2 For your information, staff will be discussing the lot issue with our Property Services staff. It is also our understanding that the fill placed on the site is under enforcement by the WA State Department of Fish and Wildlife. Based on the results of these two actions, you, the applicant, may need to produce additional information such as a Property Survey. However, the extent of the additional information for these two issues is not known at the time of this letter. When the lot and ownership issues have been resolved, written criteria justifications and the additional fee are received, staff will review for completeness whereupon your application may be formally accepted and processed or you may be further requested to provide more informationljustification. Please contact me at (425) 430-7362 if you have any questions. Sincerely Susan Fiala, AICP Senior Planner Attachments Incomplete_643_Lord. doc 3. ❑ Project Narrative: Please provide 11 copies of a clear and concise description of the proposed project, including the following: • Project name, size and location of site • Land use permits required for proposed project • Zoning designation of the site and adjacent properties • Current use of the site and any existing improvements • Special site features (i.e. wetlands, water bodies, steep slopes) • Statement addressing soil type and drainage conditions • Proposed use of the property and scope of the proposed development • For plats indicate the proposed number, density and range of sizes of the new lots • Access • Proposed off-site improvements (i.e. installation of sidewalks, fire hydrants, sewer main, etc.) • Total estimated construction cost and estimated fair market value of the proposed project • Estimated quantities and type of materials involved if any fill or excavation is proposed • Number, type and size of any trees to be removed • Explanation of any land to be dedicated to the City • Proposed number, size or range of sizes of the new lots and density (if applicable) • Any proposed job shacks, sales trailers, and/or model homes • Any proposed modifications being requested For projects located within 200 -feet of Black River, Cedar River, Springbrook Creek, May Creek and Lake Washington please include the following additional information: • Distance from closest area of work to the ordinary high water mark of the proposed project site • Nature of the existing shoreline • The approximate location of and number of residential units, existing and potential, that will have an obstructed view in the event the proposed project exceeds a height of 35 -feet above the average grade level a. ❑ Justification for the Variance Request: Please provide 10 copies of a written statement separately addressirig and justifying each of the issues to be considered by the City. The burden of proof as to the appropriateness of the application lies with the applicant. In order to approve a variance request, the Reviewing Official must find -ALL the following conditions exist: •Ale The applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, and location or surroundings of the subject property; and the strict application of the Building & Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical classification • The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated • Approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated • The approval, as determined by the Reviewing Official, is the minimum variance that �/.> �. will accomplish the desired purpose dye dY /G'�/� i, �� �� C.L1'1 �h Q:%WEBIPMEVSERV\Forms%Planninglvariance.doc V wt21 r�-nG� 4-9-190G ing, and filed with the City Clerk and as ap- proved by the City Council and the Department of Ecology. 4. Burden of Proof on Applicant: The bur- den of proving that the proposed substantial development is consistent with the criteria which must be met before a permit is granted shall be on the applicant. C% BONDS: The Development Services Division may require the applicant to post a bond in favor of the City of Renton to assure full compliance with any terms and conditions imposed by said department on any shoreline permit. Said bond shall be in an amount to reasonably assure the City that any de- ferred improvement will be carried out within the time stipulated. H. ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS: The Planning/Building/Public Works Department shall have the final authority to interpret the Mas- ter Program for the City of Renton. Where an ap- plication is denied or changed, per subsection E6 of this Section, an applicant may appeal the deci- sion denying or changing a "substantial develop- ment permit" to the Shoreline Hearings Board for an open record appeal in accordance with RMC 4-8-110. See RMC 4-8-110H for appeal proce- dures to the Shoreline Hearings Board. I. 'VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USES: 1. Purpose: The power to grant variances and conditional use permits should be utilized in a manner which, while protecting the envi- ronment, will assure that a person will be able to utilize his property in a fair and equitable manner. 2. Authority: a. Chy Hearing Examiner: -The Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner shall have authority to grant conditional use permits and variances in the administration of the Renton Master Program. b. State Department of Ecology Deci- sion: Both variances and conditional use permits are forwarded to the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General's of- fice for approval or denial. 9-54 c. Time Limit, Permit Validity, and Ap- peals: Conditional permits and variances shall be deemed to be approved within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of receipt by the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General's office unless writ- ten communication is received by the ap- plicant and the City indicating otherwise. i. Conditional use permits and vari- ances shall be filed with the State in accordance with RCW 90.58.140(6) and WAC 173-27-130. ii. Permit validity requirements of subsection J of this Section shall ap- ply to conditional use and variance permits. iii. Appeals of conditional use or variance permits shall be made in ac- cordance with RMC 4-8-110H. 3. interpretation: it shall be recognized that a lawful use at the time the Master Pro- gram is adopted is to be considered a permit- ted use, and maintenance and restoration shall not require a variance or a conditional use permit. 4. Variances: a. Purpose: Upon proper application, a substantial development permit may be granted which is at variance with the cri- teria established in the Renton Master Program where, owing to special condi- tions pertaining to the specific piece of property, the literal interpretation and strict application of the criteria estab- lished in the Renton Master Program would cause undue and unnecessary hardship or practical difficulties. r b. Decision Criteria: The fact that the applicant might make a greater profit by { „. , using his property in a manner contrary to 5vwU�s the intent of the Master Program is not, by itself, sufficient reason for a variance. The Land Use Hearing Examiner musts find each of the following: i. Exceptional or extraordinary cir- cumstances or conditions applying to the subject property, or to the in- tended use thereof, that do not apply generally to other properties on shorelines in the same vicinity. ii. The variance permit is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant possessed by the owners of other properties on shorelines in the same vicinity. iii. The variance permit will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property on the shorelines in the same vicinity. iv. The variance granted will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this Master Program. v. The public welfare and interest will be preserved; if more harm will be done to the area by granting the variance than would be done to the applicant by denying it, the variance will be denied, but each property owner shall be entitled to the reason- able use and development of his lands as long as such use and devel- opment is in harmony with the gen- eral purpose and intent of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, and the provisions of this Master Pro- gram. 4-9-190J will be granted subject to each of the fol- lowing conditions: i. The use must be compatible with other permitted uses within that area. ii. The use will not interfere with the public use of public shorelines. iii. Design of the site will be compat- ible with the surroundings and the City's Master Program. iv. The use shall be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City's Master Program. v. The use meets the conditional use criteria in WAC 173-27-160. J. TIME REQUIREMENTS FOR SHORELINE PERMITS: 1. Applicability and Modification at Time of Approval: vi. The proposal meets the vari- ance criteria in WAC 173-27-170, 5. Conditional Use: Aee Aflame G a. Purpose: Upon proper application, a conditional use permit may be granted. The objective of a conditional use provi- sion is to provide more control and flexi- bility for implementing the regulations of the Master Program. With provisions to control undesirable effects, the scope of uses can be expanded to include many uses. b. Decision Criteria: Uses classified as conditional uses can be permitted only after consideration and by meeting such performance standards that make the use compatible with other permitted uses within that area. A conditional use permit 9-55 a. The time requirements of this Sec- tion shall apply to all substantial develop- ment permits and to any development authorized pursuant to a variance or con- ditional use permit authorized under this Program. b. if it is determined that standard time requirements of subsections J2 and J3 of this Section should not be applied, the Development Services Division shall adopt appropriate time limits as a part of action on a substantial development per- mit upon a finding of good cause, based on the requirements and circumstances of the project proposed and consistent with the policy and provisions of this Mas- ter Program and RCW 90.58.143. If it is determined that standard time require- ments of subsections J2 and J3 of this Section should not be applied, the Hear- ing Examiner, upon a finding of good cause and with the approval of the De- partment of Ecology, shall establish ap- propriate time limits as a part of action on a conditional use or variance permit. "Good cause" means that the time limits established are reasonably related to the time actually necessary to perform the 14154 C- I7 -.27-1 W. ? For landward proiects: i. That the strict application of the bulk, dimensional or performance standards set forth in the applicable master program precludes, or significantly interferes with, reasonable use of the property; ii. That the hardship described above is specifically related to the property, and is the result of unique conditions such as irregular lot shape, size, or natural features and the application of the master program, and not, for example, from deed restrictions or the applicant's own actions; iii. That the design of the project is compatible with other authorized uses within the area and with uses planned for the area under the comprehensive plan and shoreline master program and will not cause adverse impacts to the shoreline environment; iv. That the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege not enjoyed by the other properties in the area; v. That the variance requested is the minimum necessary to afford relief; and, vi. That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect. LOA OLA -off City of Renton"l - 0sq 'D" 4 7(. 0 LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: L ADDRESS: 3507 Pi -Rd '41 -F, AVEF Id, CITY: ZIP: ()'�i TELEPHONE NUMBER: 175 22(,- 77 APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: COMPANY (if applicable): ADDRESS: CITY: ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER CONTACT PERSON NAME: LAMA COMPANY (if applicable): Z ^jv ADDRE�SSi` �iy y�° 3 -7 rrr.I v a W rCiTY: , I� E1 R ZIP: TELEPHONE.NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: +Z2E,- zzC, -7 -7 Lk5 Si,_ 11--1 S+ 2 s N W L -CN Ic : CO M Q:1WEBWWWEVSERVIAFORMIaformm&sterapp.docO6/25/02 PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT /NAME: PROJECTIADDRESS(S)ILOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 5uf Mrkf v, L Vv K/. i 04-fvr4, v'VA- cWr6; KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): AKPF EXISTING LAND USE(S): 2 G_'c,I��C PROPOSED LAND USE(S): i: �>asID���-- 4F_ EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING frf applicable): SITE AREA (in square feet): 1-7 -3, SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING THREE LOTS OR MORE (if applicable): PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): F )JECT INFORMATION (cone NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): Z SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (f applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): 035 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: 1 � j J pp ©, 00 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): a AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE 0 AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO o FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. O GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. O HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. 0 SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES 933 sq. ft. a WETLANDS sq, ft, LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following Information Included SITUATE IN THE QUARTER OF SECTION a, TOWNSHIP;II RANGES IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. t 0©0 3. 2. _VBG \1.,A a.,,. a5o 4. 15ad •"�� Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP r, ,1 Q LDIZI] declare that I am (please check one) the current owner of the property I, (Print Namara) _ 'v ��iC, �D Involved in this application or the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the Information herewith are in all respects true and coned to the best of my knowledge and belief.!! I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Mat A_ ( =' �« signed this Instrument and acknowledged it to be hWherhheir free and voluntary ad for the uses and purposes mentioned In the instrument. ignature URepresentathre) (Signature of Owner/Representative) Q:IWESIPWMEVSERVIAFORMIafomimmwmpp.docO6/25/02 Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print)' Ul h Ism LL<A)m _ .. My appointment expires:_ _ '4 ~ 15_01 Mark and Lisa Lord 3307 Mtn. View Ave. N. Renton, WA 98056 November 5, 2003 City of Renton Development Services Division 4- 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Wa 98055 RE: Variance request To whom it may concern: Pursuant to the drawings submitted for construction of a small addition to our home and and detached garage we are requesting a lot line variance. The square footage of the garage was designed in respect to specific restrictions and maximum allowable space as dictated by the City of Renton. I have not submitted detail for specific property addresses as we believe variances have been granted and necessary for construction of most homes built on the 3700 block of Lake Washington Blvd. as well as those built on most of Ripley Lane. Our request is based primarily on the unusual length and narrowness of our property which makes it considerably difficult to maintain the functionality of the garage without the requested variance. Should it become necessary to submit specific addresses that have been granted similar variances, I would be happy to research those properties and forward such information, Thank you in advance for your consideration. Mark and Lisa Lord N JUSTIFICATION FOR MEZZANINE VARIANCE (Justification #S) We wish to request an administrative variance for the mezzanine above the detached garage. Due to the small floor space and desire to include both a single car parking area as well as a minimal wood working area we feel the space is necessary for storage of keepsakes, holiday decorations etc. Access would be via a pull down stairway and would be open to the space below. Because the garage has a peak roof we feel this would otherwise be wasted space. Two properties I would reference that have similar upper storage would be located at: 919 N 35`h Street 1207 N 33`d Street We appreciate your consideration and hope you find this to be acceptable justification to grant variance. CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION (#6) Construction will be scheduled to begin 4-6 weeks following issue of permit and will be completed in approximately 4-6 months time. Construction hours will be scheduled for Monday thru Friday 7:30am — 5:00pm. Transportation routes from property will be as follows: Right onto Lake Washington Blvd. Three blocks south to 30th. Left on 300, approximately '/z mile to highway 405 at N 30'h known as exit #6. Deliveries coming from North of Renton will possibly use exit #7 going North on Lake Washington Blvd. 1-1 /2 miles to Mtn. View Ave. r' E MARK & LISA LORD RES. 3307 MT. VIEW AVE. N. RENTON WA. 98056 PARCEL # 3124059004 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PART OF SECTION 31 TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W. M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. T SCOPE OF WORK: CONSTRUCT NEW ADDITION, DECK WITH STORAGE BELOW AND A NEW DETACHED GARAGE. LOT COVERAGE: EXISTING HOUSE 833 SQ. FT. NEW ADDITION 782 SQ. FT. NEW GARAGE 700 SQ. FT. TOTAL 2315 SQ. FT. LOT 17358 SQ. FT. = 13.4 % PROJECT NARATIVE Ap , Project name: Lord Garage/Addition Size: 17,358 Sq. ft. Location: 3307 Mtn. View Ave. N. Renton, WA 98056 Permits required: Located on Lake Washington, a shoreline use permit will be required Zoning designation: Site and surrounding properties are zoned R-8 Current use: Single family residence Special site features: Lake Washington waterfront, high bank on East side where railroad is located Soil type: Sandy and undisturbed with natural drainage to the lake. An estimated 30yds of soil will need to be excavated and removed with new gravel imported to extend the existing driveway Proposed use: New addition and detached 700 square foot garage. The proposed structures would stay within height restrictions but due to the shape of the lot the garage set back from the lake would be 13' and the house 18' Distance from high water mark: garage 13' Existing shoreline: Rockery bulkhead full length of proposed project with approximate 15' length of shoreline of round rock which replaced concrete. Estimated cost: $130,000.00 NI.: - �. ITL _ I ..�. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVIS1014 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Development Services Division Cl ry 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-030-7200 Fax. 425430-7231 PR PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencisito consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. Q:IWEBIPWIDEVSERV1Forms\Planninglenvchlst. doc08/29/03 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: L,,Qp CAZ&(,-e�/ADD 1 TION 2. Name of applicant: MAIZ� L-aZJ--> 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 3:307 MTN VI I%W Avg= Irl . RSMmt , WA 980G& 4. Date checklist prepared: 14Z�"' (o5 5. Agency requesting checklist: GITy oV VZONTt-Dt•i 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. K 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. K10tJE 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. KID 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, If known. u T Y of Bu I, uDl NG PEF2M I T1 -\IQ D V421,ANGE 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. i-}�r�t� ADD I nom S�ro�G Q:1WEB1PW1DEV3ERV1Forrm\Planninglcnvchlst.doc 2 L 12. location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range If known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); fiat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other FLA -F W I T -J SLoPtD �.iAZ20W WAL-V-VV \/ b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. S4�WDy bIJD UnIDISTV2��D d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. NO g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Q:IWEBIPWIDEVSERV\Fom s\Planninglenvchtst.doc 3 Ll 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, aptomobiie, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. C-OkI IZG"iS —) ZOC—iC FEZ f;n 7 1 C>A,Tt O -Q b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. NO C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: N/A 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the Immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. LAS WA,,:�*ttl Kir,-TbQ 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N0We7 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NO 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. NO 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NO Q:IWEHIPW1DEVSERV1For=\Planningleuvchtst.doc 4 b. Ground Water: 1 } Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NO 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. NOT AQP C. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. M47O ?&L_ DIS QACje; 70 L.bk-F, 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts,. if any: KA /A 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: — deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other A shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? ioklE C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Mille d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Nod L Q:1WEBIPWIDEVSERV1Forms\Planninglcnvchlst.doc 5 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or pre known to be on or near the site: Birds: ha , hero agle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, el ea other MuS.V— Ar Fis as n rou herr ng, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: KA©QCG 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. / 6.A5 5L.eC.T� i G 1/VOOD SiZ)1le r (rr- Av.6, i LAP, La b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Mo C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: �'Jn'ie T. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. KAD 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. moti e, 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Q:1WEBIPWIDEVSERV\Fomis\Planninglenvchistdoc 6 • b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? MDN1 E 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. CC)t% 71ZLX,T_(C711,J �j; Al -t 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 1"M e 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. �Q C. Describe any structures on the site. S1Q6:tL4F, Z-05,. H!�`I--tG d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? t\l0 e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? T- 9. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. TO M Y i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? r Q:1WEBIPWIDEVSERV\Forms\Planninglenvchlst.doc 7 J. Approximately now many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Kk 1A I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if if any: 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N /A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N�A C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. /AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Cx'TU�24 ole. - Ss' I Q C l -e, b. What views in the Immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? KIbi 9 C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic Impacts, if any: 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? tlaNe b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No Q:1WEBIPWIDEVSERV1Form \Planninglenvchlst.doc 8 C. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Kk�2QEF d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: K� /,4, 12. RECREATION a. What designated and Informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? w o�'A (7-1 b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. KA //A C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: NJ /A 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Na b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/,& C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. MTN V! RW ,cit/G. VIA, L-A V—e WASH 17---.,LVr-) NJ. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? `, m i i—e (M. 307H ) C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? N/a Q:1WEBIPWIDEVSERV\Forrns\Planninglenvchlst.doc 9 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? N 0 e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. AACoNT To �7- e f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Dow 'T k-- Wow g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: s"At-L- PP-oJ car e4 -I L-Ct oto L y O_C,-gOl ef. 2 -4 L-OMlvz z>ujA vems 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, pollce protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. �d b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, If any. W /A 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities cqnDtly available at the sita. electrld , natural ga wa a efuse service, elephon sanitary sews eptic system, other— b. the . b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. L. � IVIG I N To NAM,)iZ�(� AVa �8 r L-1 TV C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It Is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. / V�%' i Name Printed: Date: Q:1WEBIPWIDEVSERVIForms\Planninglenvchlst.doc 10 Lisa Lord From: "Dave Maddux" <DaveMaddux@PNWr.com> To: <skimstr@nwiink.com> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2044 1:59 PM Subject: 3307 Mtn. View Drive N Order No. 561277 I had one of our most experience title people take a look at this property, and we are looking at many hours of research and expense just to put a title report together. Minimum charge would be at least $1,000.00. At this time, I would recommend that you talk to an attorney as to what legal steps could be taken to perfect your title in the subject property. I am placing this order on hold, and will not proceed until advised. Page t of 1 APR I, 'fi,7Qf "I'vo VeD 3/24/2004 N M NK w- iuuiw-r vn: VU nrr rur riUV.LALy rlg4.lui1d1 ilL18 rage �t 8 +�11s/ua u clry 0 R NTpNNING APR r -C RECEIVE eFidelity National Title Company of Washington Underwritten by Fidelity National Title Insurance Company 3500 198th Street SW #300 Lynnwood, Washirgtcn 98037 Direct Line 1425) 640-3502 /640-3504 Fax :Vo . (425) 670-."62 Toll Free: I-600-776-3021 UNIT 3 TITLE ORDER NUMBER: 03540$4 TO: FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE -ESCROW DEPT, UNIT: Bill Fisher, 3500 188TH STREET SW, 4300 Senior Title Officer LYNNWOOD, WA 98037 Paula Luxmore, Title Officer Attention CURT JOHNSON Mike Stanwood, Your Number -- Title Officer Reference Name: LORD TITLE ORDER NUMBER: 0384080• A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Commitment Effective Date. March 30, 2004 at 8:00 A.M. Policy or Policies to be Issued: - ALTA Owners Policy - 1998 Form Amount $ To Follow Homeowner's Coverage Premium $ To Follow Homeowner (30V discount) Rate Sales Tax: $ To Follow Proposed Insured: TO FOLLOW - ALTA Loan Policy - 1992 Form Amount $ To Follow Extended Coverage Premium $ To Follow Simultaneous Rate Sales Tax: $ To Follow Proposed Insured: APPROPRIATE LENDER - Easement Charge Premium $ 50.00 Sales Tax: $ 4.45 2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this Commitment is a fee simple estate, a5 to Parcel A and an easement estate, as to Parcel B. 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Commitment vested in: LISA LAVALLEY-LORD and MARK T. LORD, presumptively subject to the community interest of their spouse, if married on or since December 31, 1999, date of acquiring title 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of King, State of Washington, and is described as follows: See Attached 20090710000863 PAGE001 OF 003 G1CD 44.00 07/10/2809 17.38 ..wv ry KIK COUNTY, WA ,,;.. -2398885 •: 074102009 12:32 WHEN RECORDEID"RETURN Tp:•w ` > ux c;; cnu TY, wa Kurt Lichtenberg,. sad Sae . 00 PAG0001 OF 001 10900 NE a Strut;'#223a Bellevue, Washington 98.004...:-" ;Out* CLA ?A DEED' "( Grantor: MARK LORD f I Grantee: LISA LAVALLEY-LORD' Legal Description: see attached Exhibit A - , Assessorms:firol ax PaID No. 312405- c0 77—a.� THE GRANTOR'MARK, LORD, for and in consideration of the:Deckee-of Disso wtion.;of th'e patties in King County Superi6r Cpurt under Cause No. 07-3-02259-1 SEA, conveys and quit.ckaim§ to:.LISA LAVALLEY- LORD„the following described real estate, situated in the County of King;, State of Washington, together with all after acgpired title ofahe grantor and all rights, title and interests appurtenant th ree: See'exhibit,Aattached,,.Records'of.King County, WA Commonly known`as:-'3307'TVlountain View Avenue North, Renton WA 98056 DATED 12, - MARK•!_ORD, Grantor STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ) :f -.;:-F BY PIN ly.; On this day personally appeared before me MARK L RD to me known:to be:t6e individual descriliett who executed the within and foregoing instrumentr rid acknowled ed that h , i ned the same as his 9 i3 99 ,.._.,. voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes theroln mentioned;'- GIVEN under my hand and official seal this day of t- - ``' ', 2009.” .140 Notary Public in and for the Stat�gfCUaBhin Residing at: 's in I - • ' z My Commission expires: .2/ pO��G �1 2 04 1.1'a ,`O - Order No. 693327 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 2 The referred to in this commitment is situated in the State of Wazhi4gtofi, .aYid"&escribed as follows: All,.'--t�at certain pa cel of land as shown on plat of Boundary Survey for M'X.- ar."Lor'd 4aj &L roa', 12ase...Apquisitions, according the survey th: !r . tof * .'req6rd6 Apr i p Volume 128 of Surveys, page 292, uni.z-- ReCor ing' "' de d Numbp 990 129002, in King County, Wash.;ngtbn, 1y' i n g" in,"- -t " tio j�� TQ�qnship 24 North, Range 5 East, oc n.-... 3 1, W. M. Kijig q6un5y", 4i-.qkshin %t ",'�:-...-lurther described for reference as f of lows"...'r. Commencing at-,..th� southe4i:s:t.--6orAer af­-,s4Lid Secy 31; Thence north 1°4E' 16-" eatt.-.'{bearirig assueked fo.f p..iirposes of this description) along ;the.11�apt 13n of 'SectdW ;said31 a distance of i 1,675.55 feet; Thence north 88011,441, feet'" eeL4" to:` " a cf ases.monument in the centerline of Lake washingtbn:.boulevpxd; Th4rik:,.south 61020,101, west, 152.90 fe�'�e.t to lhtersectiori'�.with.;--'a 'Zine with and distant 20.0 feet ao measured at" right'. ang-. e r, -he cente'r'line of The Burlington kbit"he:rn Railway,.,` bomp.A�Iyl a ..(formerly Northern Pacific Rik il;4y-.�"Company) Se`atele- ..-13elt :-,-:''Lin6 Mdin 'Track, as now located and con's`6i7ucted1'-.* upon, over and acFo9s:said section 31 and being the TRUE POINT bi'BEQtNNTING"of pa-rceL'herein described; Thence west, a distance of 65.84 f-eei tb -,intprseckioh with,` ­,.the southeasterly line of Mountalh Vlew.!'Avenue; 7k ence,;north 2.2.°57:59" * east along said southeasterly lih�' for a distavcbe:of ;12 .;i3 feet; north 2 4 0 5 7.,! 5 V... eas-t along .Thenbe 1 g said southeasterly line for a distancc'oi,3 " i9. I eet; Thence South 590 feet to intersection with said parallel line of .'said` Rai . Iway tompany; Thence soAhw6stq�rl along''I'Said para-�Jel line of said Railway Company, being the, of a curve having g vih a radius of 1557.21 feet, .:. .... .. 1.,. through a cent ra l`.,.'angl e 4.f 9045,,`21'.'-'-'1 arid,:6A-.,arc distance of 265.15 feet; Order No. 693327 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 3 ..."13GAL.-'bESCRIPTION, continued: TheiR'ce continulng:Aiong Faid parallel line of said Railway Company, tari;q!Pnt :to the -:p�eiced�.64' cu.r.ve,.,. south 38004,211, west, for a distance of 65.36 feet to, -,the PQ'-'bint:"'of b6g�nning; TO{ k"BR' WITH:; an"' ea-s;--ethe-nt f 01g ad'oes s as provided for in instrument Recottled una;r ieco�'di"' r n4g Numbe 2bb,00222000470 E14DaCHF MB�,A QF Fidelity National Title Company of Washington ALTA Commitment, Page 2 Order No. 0384080 LEGAL DESCRIP':ION: PARCF.T. A- - All that certain parcel of land as shown on plat of Boundary Survey for Mark Lord Railroad Lease Acquisition, recorded April 12, 1999 in Book 128 of Surveys at Page 292, under Recording No. 9904129002, records of King County, Washington, lying in Section 31, Township 24 North, Range 5 East, IQ.M., records of King County, Washington, further described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Section 31; THENCE North 1048'16" East (bearing assumed for purposes of this description) along the East line of said Section 31 for a distance of 1675.55 feet; THENCE North 88011'44" West 362.42 feet to a cased monument in the centerline of Lake Washington Boulevard; THENCE South 61020'10" West 152.90 feet to inLersect_on with a line parallel with and distant 20.0 feet as measured at right angles from the centerline of the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company's (formerly Northern Pacific Railway Company) Seattle Belt Line Main Track, as now located and constructed upon, over and across said Section 31 and being the true point of beginning of the parcel herein described; THENCE North 59028115" West, for a distance of 65.84 feet to intersection with the Southeasterly line of Mountain View Avenue; THENCE North 22057159" East along said Southeasterly line for a distance of 12.23 feet; THENCE North 24°57159" East along said Southeasterly line for a distance of 39.19 feet; THENCE South 59028'15" East 119.27 feet to intersection with said parallel line of said railway Company; THENCE Southwesterly along said parallel line of said Railway Company, being the arc of a curve having a radius of 1557.21 feet, through a central angle of 90145'21" and an arc distance of 265.15 feet; THENCE continuing along said parallel line of said Railway Company, tangent to the preceding curve South 38°04'21" West for a distance of 65.36 feet to the point of beginning. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. rf/l rut rAuuALcy leu Ll uttu.A i1L.Ad Fidelity National Title Company of Washington ALTA Commitment, Page 3 order No. 0384080 SCHEDULE A (continued): LEGAL DESCRIPTION (continued): PARCEL B: An easement for roadway described as follows: A 20 foot wide easement in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, Section 31, Township 24 North, Range 5 East, W.M., lying 10 feet from and on each side of the following described centerline; Beginning at the Southeast corner of Section 31, Township 24 Horth, Range 5 East, W.M.; THENCE North 01048'1G" East along the East line of said Section 31, a distance of 1675.55 feet; THENCE North 88011'44" West 362.42 feet to a cased monument in the centerline of Lake Washington Boulevard; THENCE South 58''48'51" nest, 170.30 feet; THENCE North 590281-5" West 6.67 feet to the point of beginning of said eaeement centerline; THENCE South 33016153" West, 39.50 feet; THENCE South 19°29'16" west 96.58 feet to the centerline of the exiting centerline of the as built location of (Mountain View Avenue North, said point being on the centerline of the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company's right of way; THENCE North 79°:6'55" East, 53.57 feet to the !Westerly margin of Lake Washington Boulevard and the terminus of said easement centerline. Situate in the County of Icing, State of Washington. NOTE FOR INFORMA—IONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. ?tn 531-T24N-R5E This property is located in Y.ing County. Recording to be delivered to: Fidelity National Title Co., 720 Olive Way 1515, Seattle, WA 98101 Fidelity National Title Company of Washington ALTA Commitment, Page 4 Crder No. 0384086 SCHEDULE B I. The following are the requirements to be complied with: A. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be insured must be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. B. Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. II. Schedule B of the Policy or Policies to be issued (as set forth in Schedule A) will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. B. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public record. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the r%Ublic 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by p6r6oh6 in pvssassi3ii n6eaoi. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented -pining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the maters excepted under (a), Ib; or (c) are shown by the public records. (d) Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitude. G. Any 'lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or materials theretofore or iieYeaftey iiiriiisiiea, impo8ed by law And iiot Ah6wh by the public ybooydt. I. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. 8. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims.or other matters, if any created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the affective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. �.... .. ... .. ., •I„ 1 u 1-a "UL Jly ItU L.1.11 ui 11Lid • .!JJ - U1 ., rJly• vu Ll Fidelity National Title Company of Washington ALTA Commitment, Page 5 Order No. 0384080 C. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 1. Lien of any real estate excise sales tax upon any sale of said property if unpaid. The subject property is located in the City of Renton. The excise tax rate is 1.78V as of December 26, 1991. 2. The Taxes for said premises are unavailable at this time. The Tax Parcel number for the property being searched is 312409-9004-7 and 312409-9063-05. For further information in regards to said taxes, contact the Department of Revenue at 800-647-7706. 3, DEED OF TRUST AND ADDITIONAL ADVANCES, IF ANY, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Grantor: ANT, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company Trustee: First American Title Insurance Company Beneficiary: APEX Property & Track Exchange, Inc. Original Amount: $100,000,000.00, plus interest Dated: February 24, 1998 Recorded; August 17, 1998 Recording No.: 9808170649 4. To provide an Extended Coverage Lenders Policy, General Exceptions 1, 5 and 7 are hereby deleted. General Exceptions 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 will be considered when our Inspection and/or Survey, if required, is completed. The physical inspection will be ordered when we have the name of the lender making the loan. We will inform you layer whether the 100 Endorsement will issue with the forthcoming lenders policy. 5, Reservations contained in deed from the State of Washington recorded under Recording No. 139721, reserving to the grantor all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing, and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry. Right of the State of Washington, or its successors, subject to payment of compensation therefore, to acquire rights-of-way for private railroads, skid roads, flumes, canals, water courses or other easements for transporting and moving timber, stone, minerals and other products from this and other property, as reserved in deed referred to above, 6. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property herein described olb yi till V'ef1./ by LpPd 146.VL11 V..1 N116/01 . Recording No.: 287093 (To be omitted from forthcoming Lenders Policy.) �..,...... ��. �., nit r u i riUCiiLly rloLlurful 11LIV riay e u ul, a viiuiuu U Fiaelity National Tule Company of Washington ALTA Commitment, Page 6 Order No. 0384080 7. PESERVATIONS AND/OR EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT: 3rom: The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company Recorded: February 22, 2000 Recording No., 20000222600470 As Follows: Reserving, however, unto the Grantor, its successor and assigns, the right to construct, place, operate, maintain, alter, repair, replace, renew, improve and remove communication lines above, below and on the surface of the premises, including, without limitation, transmission by conduit, fiber optics, cable, wire or other means of electricity, voice data; video, digitized information, or other materials orinformation, pipelines, utility lines, track and facilities, including the right of ingress and egress in any such manner as does not unreasonably interfere with Grantee's use of the premises for said roadway, and further reserving unto Grantor, its successors and assigns, all right and privilege of ingress and egress to said premises as Grantor, its successor and assigns may require to investigate and remediate environmental contamination and hazards, and further reserving the right and privilege to use said land for any and all purposes not inconsistent with the u3n v t8i8Gf Svc for Said roadway Nuip%8c+6. E. A RECORD OF SURVEY AND MATTERS RELATING THERETO: Recorded: April 12, 1999 Recording Pio.: 9904129002 9. QUESTION OF THE EXISTENCE OF Ali "AUTOMATIC HOMESTEAD": If the subject property is or will be the residence of a marital community, even though the interest therein may be intended to be held as a separate or community interest, execution of the proposed conveyance, contract to convey, or encumbrance must be by both husband and wife by reason of RC1 6.13 which provides for "automatic homestead". EXECUTION UNDER A POWER OF ATTORNEY WILL NOT PROVE ACCEPTABLE UNLESS FIRST APPROVED BY THIS COMPANY. RN& Op : PD+ IAL EXCE:I)1'1br!S NOTE 1: The legal description shown in Schedule A was determined from the property address provided at the time of application. The description should be examined and approved by all the parties to this transaction prior to closing. END OF NOTES .. .. ... v . a... yr .... . ... . —....—a -y —,wi jOUA i t LtU ru yr I U a wl J,i a . I Fidelity National Title Company of Washington ALTA Commitment, Page 7 Order No. 0384080 In the event this transaction fails to close and this Commitment is cancelled, a fee will be charged to comply with the State Insurance Code and the filed Schedule of this Company. The sketch attached is provided as a courtesy only by Fidelity National Title Insurance Company of Washington, without charge, for your information. It is not intended to be a Survey or to snow all matters relating to the property (including, but not limited to area, dimensions, easements, encroachments or locations of boundaries).* It is not a part of. nor does it modify, the Title Commitment or Policy to which it is attached. The Company assumes No Liability for the correctness of any matter related to this sketch. Reference should be made to an accurate survey for further information. APRIL 5, 2004 KCR/mc THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER IF "E MAY BE OF V R'I'i3ER ASSISTANCE, PLEASE GIVE US A CALL V, -•J� . -ft LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY Orti. WITHIN 300 -FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE City of Renton Development Services Division ,o 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 96055 �` + 1 " 1,! Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PROJECT NAME: fi fj ,1 APPLICATION NO: The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Q:IWEBIPWIDEVSERV1Forms\Planninglowners.doc08/29/03 two A (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER hereby certify that the above list(s) of ad1ELc��nt property (Print Name) \p,NN R���'ti, owners and their addresses were obtained from: QQ� ��. 'Q!++ M o' Title Company Records : �° Norq �'• �y King County Assessors Records o i Ry i Signed Date 0 (Applicant) Gk••.A9 ut) NOTARY ATTESTED: t�Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at TPQ I 11 on the _ cL_ day of cI7ftGLi'Ci1 .20_�Y. Signed fit L, "*'For City of Renton Use***' CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I, . hereby certify that notices of the proposed application were mailed to (City Employee) each listed property owner on Signed Date: NOTARY ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at on the day of ,20 Q:IWEBIPWOEVSERVWorms\Planningbwners.doc 2 tp o �} p M p p c po po- b p p p° pp CA to !D w to vs w to to w w S x w w w w w w w w O u+ w ��i° w w � w w w w a C7 , � � �y� � � �Cy �y� � bCi bd bd w j E r � w� bd ro ro ro ro� �,, �, ro ro �, ro , ro ro �, ro ro ro ro w bd w to w td ro a� t t a t w ba w w a t w tz w W w� Cd a. z t fD G? G7 F Gi p, 4? m G7 m G� G� m p� G� G? 4� G�+� 4g� e 1 z 1 z z z z z z z z z z z Z d. � CL d � �[+} d. � Z ��Qpp. bpd Ldp. O .+, O ..r, O .,y O •h O [•+�•� �]. O ["�h Z1. O "�*jf CD, O ►*� O "�ryh i� O �"rhJ i1 O "�+ry•� 3S O ["rhe O "h O �"rhJ it O firth} rc � n0.�n R p R p p G ��pp ��royl. ��oo 'I C LA v w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w to w w w w w w w tp w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w to w O D 46+ m[17 r m r + ko r+ +P m r +P+ bD to � * t4 r 4.+F to m r . m rr . w +P m rr +P ea +P w +P to r +F to +P w pA to PF to +P w +P m +p to +A to +P to + to D O w w r O w O w O w O w I r+ O w l O w O w I r O w O w 1 O w ►+ O w O w .. O w Qi ►+ O w o w .+ w hp+ V O V 8 O pQ O p ox tD to to to �D to z 4 Ln Ln as 0 O K% +a CA w w fA u Cn u O M w O +. to O 0 G+ oo Z [>t Qi u4 -! w D t u to to -� � - O $ ao V. -� �. to W O 0 Ox CA a O w D v Ch ox to -� .. w M .. .- m M o w ao w w ►d C) b w w t9 -� O oo .p ao to $ w to oo w is ao o w w w w w w w w w w w t w w w ., r. z w w o w o v. oo I- 0 - 0 �� tv�7 $' o a w � co o .. w �. .. ao �c-n+ 5�C O w p w z w D w CG o w qd w C70 o r ►- m w Gd w i" Qn ul �* C� -, r Uq p C � d opo � rt .�, � W ro 1. m m e m 0 `4 C11 ,T to pr to t +p 46 iu co r+ .. o�a�� ks �, w -- � m � �� m w � m tv w �' b t <� ro �&��c�5be M R R R R t R o tv ,fe9 [�s'1 (e9 ft9 •feD p a. Z CrJ z z .+ z z z z z z z z zj z z z t0 D 00 O w w n n .* w w n rN � w h w .* w w r' r► A w n w f0 9> a tc s> a to a to a to `° t° a a to a a tD a cn o a so a a co m co a co a sn a to m m m `o 00 a sfl a a to N b' O D o to 0 9 0 O w -4 o w O w D ap � w tr (si w Cn tT CA mm ars Ox o0 C7e 00 G n q� 00 mm QS Os w t0 0 t0 0 ,10 00 01 00 � � w � to Os Os Oa Qs � w CA � D ..* ' d t v x �' �' bC1 to tz �� ti � d n �114 w tz � C w w w z a C/1 �°y 0 OR /y�[� ttl � t � "] F. /��[� �� � C! 4�1 C! LI �� I� p � � 7 �„ij mercy M � � V �' � ro 1yR R V� Qti� •' (cy �7.5y }/ �J m YY.rw111 e� � /1 i"�97 E3 ti m� � t7" � m Aht w w O tO w w ►�i ►�i «�i xi �i ►�r xi x x w H O w to I. w w w S x � w O w w O 0 w .w. w w O w it w w 0 w to O crt �Cpa O � ,�WAp O v. cp CA -4aRe �Gn V d m u �p u m �e Ctl G� lXS i�7 to ra a roc� C ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ,� ro ro ro w b0 m tz to w ro r<o reo m tz w tz w tz m W m W � < z w w !n w w P� w w w w g, < z < a. z e z m < 0. z C 0. z z e 0. z < 0. z C 0.< z a `•' z t7. G. i3+ G. t]. G. R. z 0)ro d R ro d p ro O � ro R ro Z7 ro R ro R ro R ro R C3 m R ro p O ..h O ..h OO ry ..h O `y's O `[�+7� O �"'i O �`fyrJY O [`yrY� O N1 O �y'f O �•h O fh O „'h O "h cn o w w w w w w w w w w w w w w to w w w w w w u w w w w to w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w u w w w w w w r u w w 9 n w to w w w r t� w w r w r w ►+ w r w r «A w ►+ w r w r w r w �+ w r ro ►+ w r w ►+ w r w r w r w r w r w r w r w r w w $ w w OO O 0 w 0 w 0 w 0 w 0 w 0 w o w O w o w o w O w o u 0 w 0 w o w b O g g O O p O O O p O SSS o en W 0 VA 0 uN O z [ ux o en w 0 0 en W en -4 Ul w m 8 en as 0 S w r w en 0 w 0 � m� Q O b&pill t� F. O w u to w cD r w r M b oo O en r m O u w O ►d 0 b 0 w w O w w O w 4L m r 4k wO r Ot C w P O w w —1 w w r a ro 4 ao O Cn w w O w w O w w w w w w w w w u a r Z w r 00 ►. —1 tz a°t to o0 � Ulw g w w tz CD Ia 5 w tz O r, to x w w Cn t—x w er to 0000 tr to p w, p C < C C O ro C C a.5 ; m CD� eb ro re ,� G? a b a ba roul acro td °' w aaa m a tv b eeo e<e e<D e<e pps� z w 0. z •�• z z z z z z z z ' z z z z W O OD cD 1:tir�7mz ro �p ro ro ro ro m ro �, m ro �p �, ro ro ro ro H ro ro ro �p ro ee ro ro ro ro o .r ►. 4Q o p rt R 0 R 0 R rT 0 P rr 0 R .* 0 R R 0 p .► 0 p r► 0 C6 n o p .► 0 Rte+ r 0 P n o p O �, m f 4 a a Q7 a to 00 a eD 00 a to w a eo 00 a 0 00 a eD 00 00 00 a ea 00 a eo M ,� a a 10 a to W m a to w a w W a ee 00 w 00 a w w a w 00 a eD 00 m co a to 00 a w 00 a CD 00 N O CT P, O tri to O tri T O Ln to a 0 Cri eD O Vt Q� 00 00 00 r 00 O CA Q1 O Lh ffs eD O 00 eD o0 e0 w r O Cn O Cn O Qn O en O [n O to O C7t O en t7 00 O of O Cn O of J Os s.• DEVELOPMENT Pi.AAE!+fING CITY OF R`_NTON APR 1 � 2004 aYbF DECEIVED qy1 FO MEMORANDUM ���y.9 DATE.:.' T0: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, EDNSP, Project Planner FROM: Neil Watts, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: ''d Shoe� LOCATION: ?334 U PREAPP NO. — 06 A nLeeting with the applicant has been scheduled for Thursday, �. ,LAS? — in one of the 6h floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM 'meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major Issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. Plan Reviewer assigned is d, ali Please submit your written comments to (Planner) at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. L) - � - 7 ISqara ,e a 5ePe a� dwif kA- t�lnf , �irso; (s sL.J; a,b �r ivy ! ;A? . �gplateTreapp2 HADivision.s\Develop.ser\Dev & Revised 9100 t,.7 VY MAY 2 7 2003 J� fr'-iJi�_�Id f MEMORANDUM DATE: ' ' fI�� ln3 TO: Construction Services, Fire Pro n, Plan Review, EDNSP, Project Planner 11 FROM: Neil.Watts, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application:Yd LOCATION: 230 .30 blLe4) PREAPP NO. — 061 A Mpeting with the applicant has been scheduled for // - x , Thursday, in one of the a floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM -'meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough permit level" review at this time. Note only major Issues that must be resolved priorto formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. Plan Reviewer assigned is �L1.1 _— PI le 0 P� V5 1, V �� 11ADivision.s\Deve1op.ser\Dev & P1an.ingUempIateTreapp2 Revised 9100 (Planner)Tat''� CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: June 5, 2003 TO: Pre -Application File No. 03-064 FROM: Lesley Nishihira, Senior Planner, x7270 SUBJECT: Lord Shoreline Setback Variance General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre -application for the above -referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre -application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision -makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00, plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall. Project Proposal: The subject property is located at 3307 Mountain View Avenue North, which is situated along the shoreline of Lake Washington. The proposal is to construct a 1,564 square foot two-story addition to an existing 833 square foot residence. Included with the proposal would be the construction of a 700 square foot detached garage with a 174 square foot deck and 229 square foot storage loft. Both the addition and detached accessory structure would be located within the required 25 -foot shoreline setback. Construction of the addition began prior to consultation with City staff regarding shoreline requirements and the property has been cited by the City's Code Compliance section. Zoning/Shoreline Designation: The subject property is located within the Residential - 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) zoning designation. The site is also located within the 200 -foot boundary of the Lake Washington shoreline, which is regulated by the City's Shoreline Master Program. This shoreline area is designated as an "Urban Environment." Therefore, the project must comply with the provisions of the City's shoreline regulations in addition to the development standards of the R-8 zone. This shoreline designation allows residential development on the shoreline only if all of the following are satisfied: 1) adequate public utilities are available; 2) a minimum setback of 25 feet from the ordinary high water mark is maintained; 3) density does not increase beyond current requirements; and, 4) public access should be provided if the development consists of new multi -family, condominiums or planned unit developments. Development Standards: The R-8 zone permits one residential structure / unit per lot. Detached accessory structures are permitted at a maximum number of two per lot at 720 square feet each, or one per lot at 1,000 square feet in size. Lot Coverage — The R-8 zone allows a maximum building coverage of 35% of the lot area or 2,500 square feet, whichever is greater for lots over 5,000 square feet in size. Lots under 5,000 square feet in size are permitted a maximum building coverage of 50% of the lot area. In addition to detached accessory structure, all covered porches and decks exceeding 18 -inches above grade are included in building lot coverage calculations. The proposal would result in a total building footprint area of approximately 3,042 square feet — which would arrive at an approximate building lot coverage of 17.5% on the 17,358 square foot lot. Lord Shoreline Variance Pre -Application File No. Pre03-064 Page 2 of 4 Building -Height — Building height is restricted to 30 feet and 2 -stories. Detached accessory structures must remain below a height of 15 feet and one-story with a gross floor area that is less than the primary structure. The detached garage is proposed at an approximate height of 13 feet as measured from the average finished grade to the mid -point of the roof pitch. However, the structure is proposed to include a mezzanine storage area which would not be permitted by the present development standards of the R- 8 zone. The mezzanine would be considered an additional level or half -story that would exceed the single story limitation. Therefore, the proposal must be revised to comply with the single story requirement. Setbacks — Setbacks are measured from either property lines or the ordinary high water mark to the nearest point of the structure. The required setbacks in the R-8 zone are 20 feel in the front, 20 feet in the rear, 5 feet on interior side yards, and 15 feet on side yards along streets. In addition, the City's Shoreline Master Program currently requires a minimum land clearing and development setback of 25 feet from the ordinary high water mark. The subject property is of an unusual shape and does not directly abut any public roadways. For purposes of building setbacks, staff has determined that the southern boundary would serve as the front yard with the rear yard setback to be measured from the northern boundary, and the interior side yards measured from the eastern and western boundaries. The existing structure presently has a setback varying from 10 feet to 16 feet as measured in a perpendicular line from the ordinary high water mark. The proposed addition, which includes second and third story decks on the shoreline side of the structure, would be located within approximately 20 feet of the shoreline. With the exception of the shoreline setback, the proposed addition would comply with the applicable front, rear and side yard setbacks. In the R-8 zone, detached accessory structures that are a minimum of 6 feet from a primary residence and are located between the rear of the residence and the rear property line are not required to provide a rear or interior side yard setback. The detached garage is proposed approximately 55 feet to the rear of the primary structure and would have an approximate shoreline setback of 17 feet with rear and side yard setbacks of 5 feet. With the exception of the shoreline setback and the mezzanine story, the detached structure appears to comply with the size and setback limitations of the R-8 zone. No variances or modifications from the R-8 zone development standards appear to be necessary. Shoreline Setback Requirements — The City's Shoreline regulations require residential development to maintain a 25 -foot setback from the established ordinary high water mark of a state regulated shoreline. Although portions of the existing structure presently extend into the required setback area, the addition and detached garage proposed within the required 25 -foot setback would necessitate the approval of a Shoreline Variance from the City's Hearing Examiner. Tree Cutting and Land Clearing — A variance from the City's Tree Cutting and Land Clearing regulations for construction work within the 25 -foot setback area would also be necessary for this proposal in order to perform land clearing activities necessary for the proposed construction. Sensitive Areas: The property is located on the hake Washington shoreline and would be considered "lands covered by water." This would qualify the site as "sensitive" and would, therefore, require Environmental (SEPA) Review in order to consider potential impacts from the project to the environment (such as salmon habitat). The SEPA review would allow the City to impose necessary mitigations in order to minimize any potential impacts. The applicant will be required to demonstrate that the proposal would not result in adverse impacts to shoreline habitat, in addition to providing justification for each of the applicable variance criteria. Permit Requirements/Timeframes: The proposal would require Environmental (SEPA) Review, as well as approvals of a Shoreline Variance and Land Clearing/Tree Cutting Variance. The review for all three would be conducted concurrently in an estimated timeframe of 12 to 16 weeks, including the necessary comment and appeal periods. The SEPA portion of the project would be completed within approximately 4 to 6 weeks. Subsequent to the completion of the two-week SEPA appeal period, the Documentll Lord Shoreline Variance Pre -Application File No. Pre03-064 Page 3 of 4 project would be presented to the City's Hearing Examiner for consideration of the shoreline and land clearing/tree cutting variance requests. Once issued, the shoreline variance decision would be forwarded to the State Department of Ecology and must be followed by a 21 -day appeal period. It is likely that a decision from the City of Renton for the proposal would be final within approximately 12 weeks of the acceptance of a complete application package. The land use application fee would be $1,500.00 ($1,000 for Environmental Review and half -off the two $500 Hearing Examiner level variances), plus $0.34 per mailing label required for notification to surrounding property owners within 300 feet of the site. Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal requirements is provided in the attached handouts. Variance Criteria: In addition to the variance criteria for the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting regulations, the applicant must provide justification for additional shoreline variance criteria required by the state. In order to support the variance, the burden is on the applicant to justify approval of the variances based on specified criteria. The approval of the variance must not establish an unwarranted precedence, nor be based on monetary considerations. The written justification submitted for the formai land use application must address each of the criteria listed below. Land ClearinglTree Cutting Variance Criteria a. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. b. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated. C. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. d. That the approval as determined by the Hearing Examiner is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. Shoreline Variance Criteria(pursuant to RMC 4-9-190.1.4 and WAC 173-27-170 a. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the subject property or to the intended use thereof, that does not apply generally to other properties on shoreline in the same vicinity. b. The variance permit is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant possessed by the owners of other properties on shoreline in the same vicinity. C. The variance permit will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property on the shoreline in the same vicinity. d. The variance granted will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this Master Program. e. The public welfare and interest will be preserved; if more harm will be done to the area by granting the variance than would be done to the applicant by denying it, the variance will be denied, but each property owner shall be entitled to the reasonable use and development of his lands as long as such use and development is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, and the provisions of this Master Program. f. The proposal meets the variance criteria listed in WAC 173-27-170. Document I1 Lord Shoreline Variance Pre -Application File No. Pre03-064 Page 4 of 4 1. That the strict application of the bulk, dimensional or performance standards set forth in the applicable master program precludes all reasonable use of the property. 2. That the hardship described above is specifically related to the property, and is the result of unique conditions such as irregular lot shape, size, or natural features and the application of the master program, and not, for example, from deed restrictions or the applicant's own actions. 3. That the design of the project is compatible with other authorized uses within the area and with uses planned for the area under the comprehensive plan and shoreline master program and will not cause adverse impacts to the shoreline environment. 4. That the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege not enjoyed by the other properties in the area. 5. That the variance requested is the minimum necessary to afford relief. 6. That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect. It appears as though staff would likely support the requested variances as the resulting structures would have a greater setback than the existing structure from the shoreline. However, the applicant will need to demonstrate that the upland portion of the site within the required building setback areas is not suitable for construction based on topographic or other similar constraints. cc: Jennifer Henning Documentl% CITY OF RENTON MEMO PUBLIC WORKS TO: Lesley Nishihara FROM: Jan Illian x7216 DATE: May 30, 2003 SUBJECT: PREAPPLICATON REVIEW COMMENTS PREAPP NO. 03- 064 LORD SHORELINE SETBACK VARIANCE 3307 — Mountain View Ave N. NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT: The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre - application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant Is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification' and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g. Hearing Examiner, Boards of Adjustment, Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need'I to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. There are no utility related comments at this time. CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: May 30, 2003 TO: Leslie Nishihira FROM: Rebecca Lind STAFF CONTACT Don Erickson SUBJECT: Lord Shoreline Setback Variance Staff have no comment on this variance request. The applicant has not provided any narrative in support of this request or explaining how much of a variance they are requesting. As a consequence we unfortunately cannot comment on it. cc: Don Erickson DocumenWd 3307 Mountain View Avenue N - 2010 photo Notes None 1:352 29 0 15 29 Feel NAD _1983 HARN_StatePlane_Washington_ Norah FIPS 4641 City ofOn z Finance & IT Division Legend Jurisdiction Boundaries RM -F Residential Multi -Family L_d Other ■ RM -T Residential Multi-FamltyTraditional ClCry of Renton RM -U Residential Mule-Femdy Urban Center Addresses ® CV Center Village ❑ Parcels ■ CP Center Downtown Zoning ■ UC -N1 Urban Center- North 1 . RC Resource Conservation UC -1142 Urban Center - North 2 R-1 Res,dental 1 dulac . COR Commercial OtficefResrdenflal R4 Residen9al 4 dulac CA Commercial Arterial R-8 Residential B duJac CO Commercial Office Information Technology - GIS This map is a user generated static output from an INemet mapRng Site and is for reference only Data layers that appear on tNs map may or may not he RentortMapSuppon®Renionwa gov accurate current, or otherwise reliable 4/19/2013 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 3307 Mountain View Avenue N - 2010 photo None 0 1:1,407 111111111111111111111117-1 117 0 59 117 Feet NAD 1983_ HARN_StataPlane_washkngton_ North FIPS 4801 ��tyo, one Finance & 1T Division t_egena Jurisdiction Boundaries F) olr LlCHyof Rrntun Addresses ❑ Parcels Overlay Districts El Auto Mail A ❑ Auto Mall B Employment Area Valley "I City Center Sign Regulation Area e Urban D"gn District P Information Technology - GIS Ttns map is a user generated static output from an Internet maPp N site and RentonMs Su ort is for reference only Date layers that appear an this map may or may not be p PP ®Rentonwa. ov 9 accurate, current or otherwise reliable 4/19/2013 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION a 3307 Mountain View Avenue N - 2007 photo Notes None a 1: 1,407 117 0 59 117 Feet NAD _1983 HARN_StatePlane_Washington_ North FIPS 4801 City of on Fbmce & IT Division Legena Jurisdiction Boundaries �.! Other City of Panton Addresses ❑ Parcels Overlay Districts El Auto Mall A ❑ Auto Mall 9 aEmployment Area Valley i City Center Sign Regulation Area Urban Design District D Information TeChnOIOgy - GIS 7h -s map is a user geneiated stanc Output from en Internet mapping site and Su rt Remonwa. ov is for reference Orly Data layers that appear On this map may Or may not to RenttarlMa P PPo ® 9 acctxate, current or otherwise reliable 4/1912013 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 4- WW WW s"49 ww.l Cr` y� :v CAIr Mqf) Printed: 04-14-2004 ory OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA04-043 Payment Made: 04/14/2004 11:29 AM Receipt Number: Total Payment: 1,508.88 Payee: LISA LORD Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 1,000.00 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 500.00 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 8.88 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check 6312 1,508.88 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due ------ 3021 ------------------ 303.000.00.345.85 --------------------------------- Park Mitigation Fee --------------- .00 5D06 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees .00 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/waivers .00 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat .00 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees .00 5010 000.345.81..00.0007 Environmental Review OD 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat .00 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat .00 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD .00 5014. 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees .00 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment .00 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks .00 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone .00 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt .00 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev .00 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval .00 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use or Fence Review .00 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance -Fees .00 5023 0 .00 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee .00 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend .00 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies .00 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) .00 5954 604.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits .00 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage .00 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax .00 R0401868 MARK & LISA LORD RES. SCOPE OF WORK: 3307 MT. VIEW AVE. N. CONSTRUCT NEW ADDITION, RENTON WA. 98056 DECK WITH STORAGE BELOW PARCEL # 3124059004 AND A NEW DETACHED GARAGE. LEGALDES-CRMPTION: PART OF SECTION 31 TOWNSHIP 24 LOT COVERAGE: NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W. M.1 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXISTING HOUSE 833 SQ. FT. NEW ADDITION. 782 SQ. FT, NEW GARAGE 700 SQ. FT. TOTAL 2315 SQ. FT. LOT 17358 SQ. FT. = 13.4 % I'll - - _ MT. VIEW AVE. N. . .. ..... . ... .. .... .. . ... ....... Al2 7 - 4 5 -15 9 1 0 1 /'v. 19 LAKE i 00 WASHINGTON 0�1.vv op 24'6 '-�-,-�._ --- • }i lE,� -� 'frit r },l l � � { '$, .. �� �., :..� MJ 'zW492 DE I SQ. FT. Fes' c WLI 10, lv� c Aq) r fpl I 3& PI AKE I�yASHIToNBCVp e 700 LOFr C3 < 8TORAGE SQ, Fr. .cam ~ " zo -.... L.--_.--._------- - |........ ~...... ... ........ _-_' W4 ..... .... -._............ ..''~~- , '~--20 v1 -~~-�-~-~~'~-^~`-~''--~^'~-~--~~'~—~--~-~' --'~-'^----~~~---~-^~---`--~-~`^^- | / / --~~-�- ��� 7 7~�7�7� 7 7 777,777 7� ���r� � �����°r^~��r^�^'^�~� l ` __............ _..... ... __~___~ ` 59'4—.~ .....~'. ...... ~___....... ~-__ �_-~-................. ___, ' ~ ` .�^ LIVING �� �00��x�� �� ��N�� �. 8=����NN�8 FLOOR 0~� - �_���8M���~� Jw�B��N~��� Q��N��&0N�� �- ��.� PLAN �~" � "� �`�� ° ~" ~^�~ ^ "�°" ~"° � ° �°`*~ ~°~^ ~ ^ ~~~ ^^ ~ 1219 sq ft ' Q��� �� �^N V8 �aw0 M ' � " , , " ��� __'~^�-_-~..-' `_ | > � 1317 ...... .... ........ _~v ~x°v____'_.---'_-- _-1 --^_.'.--.- _'.-._---_. 24 - - - ` � | / > � WALLS REMOVED ~-- � � ~~\ � LIVING AREA 8~~"~ SQ. , , " ............ ~-'__-.--._»»� ~.-..... _.............. __.... ..... -13'9~_...................................... ^^' 24111 v- -'-- --------------~-', ���� .~.'_-_-.~____'_-___~_~-----_.-____-~._-__---_-~-^_^-°___�_~--_-^�-__-_^__-___'-'-_-__~_'-----__^~'-~-'_-^-----.---~___--~~-~_-'__�J rr-^'px~r , i � BASEMENT wN ��|�m�^ Vv �� v V � � "° w '---... ...... ..... ' - - ---'-- n� ° p� .... ..... ___- |........ ~...... ... ........ _-_' W4 ..... .... -._............ ..''~~- , '~--20 v1 -~~-�-~-~~'~-^~`-~''--~^'~-~--~~'~—~--~-~' --'~-'^----~~~---~-^~---`--~-~`^^- | / / --~~-�- ��� 7 7~�7�7� 7 7 777,777 7� ���r� � �����°r^~��r^�^'^�~� l ` __............ _..... ... __~___~ ` 59'4—.~ .....~'. ...... ~___....... ~-__ �_-~-................. ___, ' ~ ` .�^ LIVING �� �00��x�� �� ��N�� �. 8=����NN�8 FLOOR 0~� - �_���8M���~� Jw�B��N~��� Q��N��&0N�� �- ��.� PLAN �~" � "� �`�� ° ~" ~^�~ ^ "�°" ~"° � ° �°`*~ ~°~^ ~ ^ ~~~ ^^ ~ 1219 sq ft ' Q��� �� �^N V8 �aw0 M ' � " , , " ��� __'~^�-_-~..-' `_ | > � 1317 ...... .... ........ _~v ~x°v____'_.---'_-- _-1 --^_.'.--.- _'.-._---_. 24 - - - ` � | / > � WALLS REMOVED ~-- � � ~~\ � LIVING AREA 8~~"~ SQ. , , " ............ ~-'__-.--._»»� ~.-..... _.............. __.... ..... -13'9~_...................................... ^^' 24111 v- -'-- --------------~-', ���� .~.'_-_-.~____'_-___~_~-----_.-____-~._-__---_-~-^_^-°___�_~--_-^�-__-_^__-___'-'-_-__~_'-----__^~'-~-'_-^-----.---~___--~~-~_-'__�J rr-^'px~r , i � BASEMENT wN ��|�m�^ Vv �� v V � � "° w '---... ...... ..... ' - - ---'-- e 24'11 19'2 t,v 04 SECOND FLOOR 1/411=1# .24'11 ---- P LAN LIMING AREA 585 sq ft f { F.L. 2 , _. .... 1 { 'x GRADE GRADE S NEW D t 1 SO. ELEV. 1/4 30F6Y F .��-.�--.,....,�,-:�:r-•'�� �-x..�:r.,.,-�.>..-y�.s..w.�-r-..»z.sy'.,,,, .u.r.- ....._;r m•.r�. `f4.- v: S.... >r-',>v:'Nrr�4. 'W-'..-. -cc.Y r`?'.�-= �`X+ .c.._:Y'. iis.Y :.�i.:a'.--:ssa ;Y.= �.Y.'S.Y.f. -. ..-,..., ., r �:.c.:�.,r•:.. ......... .... . : ._ _ _ ._ ..'�:�� - ... m-...».,_... ,..:r ... _ r-w,-.-..�..#.� .�.-�... �...r-..-,--.�-�:a, r,.-b:t—�.�...,.,,-,.- ,- .,.,--r� �---= x�..., .. _. ... ..c- .�.:. 11..,., e✓ R�.'...av:. .:f. :i}. 5.VS ..T .r.:."..w:...n .. .. ... � .: .ti..... .-, .. :. �. �. .,a[...s_ .r..-.,-.rx+,'.e'.x:.::.-_� :5--`Pi.+,.`....,'e:�:.J.i ;1iYL4 .•; �..: `Y:.. _'�=s -,-.;2 +;r.. ..,i` .-... .`-?Y=F: S".. `-.^""4.N;4.s 'I a f^'.,. 3 4ai=.2a`3,�:.. ,.i3'}aM:?T_'-.5 ...}!-.y''.-+,".`S�'.,..-t, .. :.. Y:. ... .t.. r..wrv....�cr-:.nniw-s.:-rv�'a_+.-,•».e.-.t:xWir��:.wy,..s+v ' .,:va._r_...--.a..-: .ry ..,::a�u, -,c�•e �,_.. F. --:eta, ,..,.�^`„x ..,. .i�-t: K'�G`„`�.��e_-zaa.-w_n..,.-,,�v+-a*_-�+v>w,tir3.i,.,..,„�,•yas%',�;->vr.�aa s5:'aa?k,. 9z.,.... �., ... ry�i=7P:� .'a::- '�,�?... _ ... -. x .._. _ __. ... ._ ..�. ... .. .�- :. . -, r_ > -: •..,:'.. .....::.._ �..-..a. _. r 'x .. -... -. -.m :o .-0. f'.. . S=4 .:i:"i- !b:1-i3',d'-'.ez..n:_I"R,:Y.q. r_I .i r :�.-l'v -.30.. ,.`t' :1 A::.. .'.b.:i -.(- �ra�"y:P,.= A=aM.. Gln. '�: '�. �9'=' - '4''fBF }. -..,UW t.� If AOV EAST ELEV. 1 /4 11.11 .......... ­­_.___­ ....... am vm."40m t_77 w4! wn=p �oF ��"- ~ F 'k` � ([+."k�` C. S� GRADE s ;.."boa-.+...w.�.._w ..�-...«._-+.. a.-..� �...,,.. ...w.,.....s.«:.r.«r..a...-�. � '."`.Y'_...�.......—.-.��...........-.-.^._--.—• NEW ADD. -----,, WEST ELEV. 1/4 11=jf 4 OF.6 vi I ig I i 35f 5'10 8'3 20'11 4'10 316 - 6'6 14'5 GARAGE FLOOR PLAN 700 SQ. FT. 1/4"=1' WATERPROOF DECK I % SLOPE 36" HIGH RAILING 01 , � ............ -.66 MAX. OPENING 2'4 6A ------- ---- 214-- MEZZANINE 229 SQ, FT. 1/411=1 1 50F6 co zo zo 50F6 1, 1 y]� 1 ••...���Y.tw..-wr..e'n.wzsa. r.�.nr...d_we e F.L. N. ELEV. 1/4"= 1' t F 4 4p WEST ELEV. i 1/411... -- 1 1 60F 6 a GRADE