HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA-07-048_Report 1BOEING LAKESHORE LANDING 2
BINDING SITE PLAN
SE 1/4 SECT. 7, 7WP. 23N., RGE. 5E., W.M.
SW 114 SECT. 8, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5E., W.M.
CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
pm ARADON'
IN WITNESS WHEREOF WE SET OUR HANOS AND SEALS:
STA'/[ OF C.wfORN1A )
)$
COOlIN OF LOS NIG£I.ES )
ON lIAROi • 2007. f1£F0R( IJE, • NOTARY PlJ8l.Jr:, P£RSOH'\u'Y
~ACnwYE\iiHCE) 10 BE fH£ PD!~ ~~~~OR1O~MI~JI£~MA~
AQ(N(J1It£tIGED TO /1£ /HAT tf£ EX£CUTrn 111£ s".1ot( IH HIS Al,II}{ORtZED CAPACITY, AND mAT 81' HIS
~n.we: ON IH£ IHSIRU1I£NT mE PfRSON OR 1J£ ENIITY UPON BEHAlF OF M«Jf mE" P£RSCN ACiID,
n'rClJ1W IH£ I/OISTRIJIiDIT.
lII'DIrSS IoIr fI~ NfD """OAL srA.l
APPROVAl S'
ADM/N/STRA TOR OF PLANNING / BUILDING / PUBUC WORKS
EJfIoUINID NfD _aim PElf RCIt' 58.17.160 (1) IHrS ___ o .... r (Y _________ ,,_
,>,DIIINIS1Ri'o TOR, CITY OF RD<TON
KING COUNTY D£PARTMfWT OF ASSESSMENTS
EXAJoIIN£D .... Na APf'RO\£D nilS ___ ~,~ _________ ,,_
KING COUNTY FlNANCE DIVISION CERTlFlCA nON
I AND SUB'yfYQR'S CFRTIfTCA If;
I HOI£8r CElQ'1In' 1HAT 1115 9IHOIHG sr/E PlAN OF 80ElHG UJ{ESHCIfE ~ IS fMSEO UPON
~ ACTI/AL IDII\£1' N«l SOSOII'ISICW (Y SECllONS 7 a /I, TOIINSHl" 2~ HOR7H. fWICE 5 OS!;
lIIU..lWEnE: _ 1HAT 111£ COURSES ANO OISTNICES ARE. SHOIW COIII'£C1Lr »I!RCON.
LUA-__ _
lEGAl Df$CRlPnON Of EXIsTING PARCE! S:
{FlIiSr ~ 1l1tE ~NIC£ CCNPJ.HY COINrn.tENT NO. NCS-2J82Q1-II'AI. DA7£D
FnIRIWIr 2a 2007) PJ\RCfl.S 11. C .wo E NIE NOT A PART OF lHIS BINllING .';'IE PUN.
PARCEl. .(-1
LOT A. CITY OF ROITc:M SHORT PUT NUI!IfiER" O9J---1ISI, RQXII/DfD 1IO\'DI8ER 14, 19l1li
UI/OUI KWG COOHTY I/£COIIOINQ NO. ~1If_ rJF omcw. R[COROS:
rxcEPT JHAr PORTION cal/1oOro TO JII£ aTY OF ffafITJN ay QUIT CI.IrI4l DEED R[CQI!O£D
IIOIo9IBER 9, 1989 I.IMI£R ~ /If). B9J10S1U7J OF amcw R£CCfilI$. IN KING COIMTY.
W"",""",
A!.SO EXCEPTlHG THERURaII "/HAT PCR1/OfI GaN\£'I'ED n:J Iff£" CfTY OF ROIroN gy DEED
Ra:oRtl€ll AlIGUST 17, 200IIi IJNtXR RECORDING NO. ~lrooo7'~ IN KWG CCXb(TY, IIt.4S/ofHICTCW.
PNICD.. "'-2
LOTS I, 2. J, 4-AAlJ 5, BLOcK J; RENTON FNIM ACREAGE, ACCORO/HG TO THE PlAT
IHf]lfXF" R£CCRiJED IN ~ 12 OF PUIS. PAGE 37, IH KING aotrNTY. M'ASH.WGlllN;
DiC£PT THEJl€FR(M !HE NORTH .JO.OO mr OF SN() LOT 1 C(W~ TO 7HE: orr OF
HalTON FOR S7REET ~s. !.INO£R R£C(Il{)fNG NO. '1110II8II OF' <lfI'lCIM. Rf:CCJI:OS.
.OJ..SO EXCEPT lHAT PORTION caI/\€'InI TO 11/[ CITY OF RCN1f»I 9Y THAT IHSlRtNENr R£CORO£O
D£CDI8iE'R 12. 2006 UNDER R£crRI)ING NO. 20061Z12OOO.ll11, IH I(ING OOONTY. WIdIINSTON.
~ NTH THE NORm ~ OF VACATED WORTH 7T1f smaT iW.XMfIHG NID /HAT
PORTION OF.w.EY NJJOIH/N/i ON 111[ IlEST AS Y.4CATm lJNOD/ CHY OF RfHTrlH rJROIoIANC£
NO. J3rg ANP R[IXRJED MAY 21, 1979 UN(J£JI KING COUNTY ~ NO. 19aI21l115.f2
OF omaAi. ~ IN ~ COOHTr'. ~
PMIOO. A-J
1H£ Ha/l'J}f JOO.OO F££T OF fH£ £AST 100.00 FrET OF THf MlRIHlIEST QUARTER OF IH£
SOti/H!If;5T QlIARIER OF SECTION II, 1rl'ItNSMP 23 //aITH. RNIG£" ~ £1tST. 1III.l.AIoI(nE:
~r~ ~~~T(W'..m J1of£REOF, CCWI'[JW TO mE" CITY OF ~~
Fm S1R££T f'UfIPOSES UNV£R flECOIIfJWG M!MBfR 518O!11111 OF cmcw. REOO'!DS;
M.SO DtCEPT /HfRUR()N /HAT P(lI!IION 7/-IfRfIJr LI1HG 'MIHIN THE II£ST HlOO fEET OF
THAT _IJON OF S!<JO _/H .100.00 F££T tWIG SOUlHmI.l' OF nil" CITY OF SEAm£
IR~ UN! /ilGHT_J_WAY. MI/Ial WAS 0fED£0 ro rm: CITY OF RrHTOH Ill' {)€ED
R£"OORCJfD IJNDElI R£Ca/OING 110. ~9l5 OF OFF1CiAL ~
ALSO EXCEPT 1MI£R£I'RllIl /HAT _lIa'I JII.!ICIi 'IMS D£ED€1J TO THE CITY OF ~TOH 8Y
DaD R£CMVro .AJNf: 7, 1994 I.MIDI R£CORDIHG Nfl ~1l1 CF omCIAL flECXlRDS.
ALSO fXC£F'r /HAT PCIImCW CON~ TO THE: arr OF R€NTON 81' mAT iltSTI'rtJlKNT ~
OC(DI6£R 12. 2OOt!I UNll£R fIDXJRO/i/C NO. 2OOt!I721~ IH KIJV; GOtMTY, il'ASirNGrtW.
PARCa A_.j-
LOTS I NIf) 2 OF LOr UHE AO.lJS7l.IDlT IW. 008-.!11:1, RECQIItIEl) HO\oDIIiIER 16, 1968
I.hIlJER il£COROIm: NO. 8/111169001 OF OffICIAl RfCORDS, IN I(JNG CDUNTY, lI'ASIlIHG1tW.
PARCfI. A-~
LOT I. BLOCIf 4, RrHrtW FAIIIoI ACIl£!IGf" .tD(lIJlON, AOCORDlHG TO /He PLAT 1H£R£CF
RECORD£D IN VGIt(N£ 12 OF f'l.A1S, PAGI!:~, IN IfflIG COUNTY. _100;
TOGEIHER MI/H THE: scrJ!II fiAt!" OF VJlc.\iID NORTH 7IH SlRf:Er )JM)/HI14G. AS VACA1£D
UNDER orr OF ~ OROIHNlC£ NO. ~7;
AlSO 1O(l[7H£R III/H TH.4T PORTION OF AU.EY.40JaIMHG ON TH[ 1I£S1; VACAJED UNrJ£R
OTY OF RfH~ (}f/(J/HNj(;£ NO. 40411, AND R£1XIfIDfD IlARDI 71, 1987 IJHO£R RECORDING
NO. 87t13IJo:i78 OF aFF/CIAL RCcams.
PARCa .0.-8
I.OT 2, BLOCII' 4, II9m:W FARIoI ACRfAG( .IDOI7ION. ACCCRaNG ro /HE f'l.AT !IIEREOF
R£CORD£D IN I(.llIMlf" 12 J P!..(TS, PAGE:n. IN KING CWMTY, WIoS'IIHG/"OH;
TOOCIHDI III'!II DlAT I'!JInIaoI OF MJ.EY ADJO/HING ON JHE II£ST. VACAJED I.JNOER Clrr
OF flDjTOH ORC!INANC£ H(1 oW48, AND RECCROm IiIAR01 II, 1987 IJIIDfIl' REcamHl; NO.
87t1311o:in OF 1I"I'ICAl. R£CORDS. ,-,
toT II AHD TRAer P, &OOtoIG UJ(£SHORE; I..ANIJIIW., A ~ SlI£ PUN. RErXiRDOJ
OECStf£R 23, ~QGoI. IJHOfII R£C(lI!(}Itj{J Ha 20041~. IN I«.(N£ 225, P .... GES
III DIRWCH 8B, OF PLATS,
£lI"CEPT /HAT PfJRII(}N CON\£"IaI ro fH£ orr OF RENTON 81' 1)/AT IrISTRIJJ.IENT REct:IROED
DElDIfJfN 12, 2006 UNDER R£COROING Na 200111212O(l(l.lJ8. If.r fflNG eotmTY, II'.-ISHHGR:W.
VICINITY MAP
RFCORQING CfRVDCA IE-~""""' ~ --------
FIUD FOIl RECORfJ AT DI£ REOI£ST OF TIlE erN (Y IlENTOH, /HIS __ ~,~ __ _
20~ AT __ /.tINUTES PItST __ .... N/D RECCIRtIaIIH \oQ.1JI,IE __ ~~"
,~, ____ RECORDS (Y raHG COU'oITY. WASHINGTOH.
DIVfSION OF RECORDS AND ELECTIONS
ORA'M.! 8Y.·
LAST EDIT:
[
] BOEINGRE.lJ..TYCCJMPANY CfTY OF RENTON
LAKESHORE LANDING 2 BINDING SITE PLAN
"R~EN~1ON~"K~W"'"-__ ,"oc~~C7,C-___ -'~C7.~~~WASH~~'N~G~TON;ey
SCALE: PRO,JECr NO. DRAWING FILE NAME:
N/A J26'<f .I2614-SURV-BSOI
BOEING LAKESHORE LANDING 2
BINDING SITE PlAN
SE 114 SEC r 7, TWP 23N" RGE. 5E" WM
SW 114 SECT 8, TWP 23 N., RGE. 5E .• W.M.
CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
LCoT I
CITY OF" RENTON LlA 06_004
Lor JlI SIlORT PLU
=LOT7B:
:$1;,67~
.07 oc=
J_~1!..lfJ.02'
JO' Ullt CSMT, A., 7VOIJI;$OiJ70
LOT7C
107,212 sf
2.46 C~
280.01'
nEe (SlIT
AF B4102liDll92
SQ!'O/l"O"W. M.a6'
,
"I
" ~ ,
-~ I
~ i;
1 ,
~ I'"
~ ,
~ I",
I ,,' ,
I
-m,,'q'i' ----..-", --~
N 6th St.
LUA-__ _ LND-__ _
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
Wf 2
CIrY OF ,~E!lroN lLA 06_0Q4
LOT " ... SHQ~T PLn
I'EC. NO. 20G61D2'900Q05
Ii UNf S~ 1/4 S,U 8-2J-5
!Bi:BO-' ----
N BIll 51.
-. -JO.70'
4" If ~. crmc.
MC!IIUMCNT IN CASE: wi COPPCR PIN M
STRUT IN7f.RS£.CTlON
II IB3798.2Ul
E: iJ0286J.41Q
RECORD EASEMENTS AND AGRfFMfNTS'
SBg"2/l'n"r
~b~v(wi~1~U'hF~;r~~W.)
'I" ellY Of' RENTON SI«JRT PLAT ~ 80EIHG PAIlCEl J8
Rfe, NO. 2001!~~90000~
(nll$1 AI.lF:llrCA.~ l1Tl F: r,'I_;URANC<: ClJW'ANY CDl.liIHMfIIT 1ICS-2J820r-WAf, DAIED ft9RUARY 28, 2(07)
---=" CITY OF R~IHON
CDNlI?Cll. !ltmUldfNT 18H
4" X 4" CONe. !.ION
w/ COI'Pfl! PIN
rOUND £!(IS1ING
MOMIMENr IN CASE,
ACCf(,7f.O AS CWTfR or
SEC7lON B-lJ-S
N IBJIllJ,09S0
~/~t~:'~~rr,Q)
8 ~Q' SPr,'1/ r~'CT "SfIAFm, RCC, NO. J2.l.'1oo7, NOT ptcm;o (rNSUffICl£NT INFORMATION IN O[SCRiPTlON, SPUR mACK NO LONGER [XlS15)
9 « 10 (IT,Lllt '" ,,'O[WAl~ 'A~I.I!:Nrs. Rfe. !lOS. J;J~!~O 4< '~J2r2!0
11. WA r,,~ £A~~"'fNT. Roe. ~O, JH2122
12, M:NE"~l R!5ER',AnOh' ay PACiFIC COAST RAILROAD r;oI.I/'ANY. RfC. NO. ~862'4D (f B' Lor 'A)
IJ, SAN,TAflY Sr~tR f)5W[~T, RfC. NO, 54J.B44~
14 SANITAIlY S(~fll f~S<MrNT, R[C. NO. S.f.'i.30!J (INSUff"fICJfNT INfOfII./AfIOtIlN DOCVl.lflolT TO D!:1!RI.IIN!: lOCATION)
I~ la' UrrUTY f~S!!JrNT, lire: NO. ~8191~~
16. POwrll eASF:M,NT, Rre. NO. ~Z762J/l
1ft '" 19. GAS fAS!M[NTS, "fC /lOS, 7JI1Z!I0292 &: 770S0Z~89
20, PC!>I£1l EASEMrNT, ~EC, ~O. 7701117073J, IIOT F'l.OHED (20' SlIIrP CfNT£RfO 0/1 ~S-lOCAIFD FAClLlT1fS IN W 50' OF LOT~)
21. 10 UTIUTr f~S£M::NT, R[C, NO. nO!IQ7O!i98
2:1.!: :l4. UnUfY EASr/.'[NfS, REC. NOS. 7710030'507'" 77111801156
25, 1(1' MIU J(I' (III:'" <ASEY!:NTS, REC. NO, 7!1081J0670 (ViICAlION ORO, .JJ27)
16, POWEll EAS:;\f~NT, R(C, NO, 8107240568. NOT nonro (10' STRII' CfNTE:1I!:D ON AS_LOCAIFO fACltlnt:S Off 5 40' or II' 1~' Of N 150' Of LOT 7A)
21, POI'IER EASE\fr~'T, RfC. NO. 8<'10180692
Jl. POWER oASEMfNi. RiC-~'o. 851216(1947
J2 POllf:R oASe!J~~T. ~EC NO. ~12'609~9. NOT PtOnro (C(II1!RrI"J ON AS-LOCAIED (ACIiITlES)
JJ VTlllfY [ASE",-NT. RW NI). 8il122J!61J. IIOOIFlfO ar RfC. NO. 1W08.2~04n
J; ACC[SS A,~O PARKINC fAS<:WENTS. REC, NOS 88D~24OOD5 '" 1J.rol2!1i11122
J5 -"OIlfR E_$"'fN~ RFe NO, 8B<l8.l0M87
J8 SIDFII)IK '" IlTlUTY [AS!:IIE"NT, flfC. NO. &10210273, NOW FALLS IN PAR~ A\'f 101 RfW
J~ U:'IltIY EASEMWT, Rrc 110. IlP01J2~04!K1
40, ,~OAOWA Y SLOP;: .!: SICEW-'l.K EASCW<:NT, Ii£C, NO, 890a290481
41. unuTY EASEMEN', ,~EC. NO, 8911r.t9O<f75
42, ,~[Sm:n,'ONS, COM'rJI~,~S, DWlCAncws, ND1fS. EASl;uDlTS ANO PROOlsPONS ON CITY OF RENTON SHOflT PLAT NO, 09J-89, flfC, NO. 8911149006
4J fE'RMS ~NO PR0\1SI0,'15 crwrAINflJ IN {IR£ ~AlN WQ'R_ J1£ AG>iITllf/iT 8EfI\£fN mE IlOfJNG COMPANY AND n-JE CITY OF" flfNTOtI, ~EC, NO.
91U52JII~B (liE'S TO NORTH or INI£R~CnOti OF" 81H ~Nl) PARK) (lXXS Nor AFTfCT SUIlJECT PflOP/'flTy) (Rr-RECOflDED UNO!" Il[C. NO. 91O~QojD9<!B).
44, PO'MR EASEMENf, Hi.~·, NO, 92071Joti61
45, POllf:ll i.AS".Y~N'~·. Ho,. NOS, 94112=2J '" ~4!12J0706
47, COVl:NAN/S. CONDIfIONS. R£Sl~ICIiONS AMJ/{)// EASEMfN15 IN OOCUf,IfNT RfCCIROCO UNDfR flEe: NO. 970J1BI<UZ, B!:ING A R£-~£CORD!NG
OF R£C NO 96,~,~0{I55
of/! CO.ENANTS. CONDmcws, ilfSTRIClIONS AND/9R fASEMe:NTS IN SOOmPOIH &: NON-OPPOSlIION At;RoO;UDH. fifO, NO. 2000111700IMJ5
49 COvrNANTS. CCJN(Jmcws, II(STlllClIONS AND/OR fASCWfNTS; R£C. PW. .zooo1ll7OO1-'54 (FRT'S PflOPfRTY) (DOES NOT AFFECT SV8JF:CT PRQPE;J1Ty).
30 & 51. OCVf:WPMENT AG,~ElJ.lENrs BETWEEN THE BODNC COMPANY liND TIfE CITY OF" IIfNTQII, IlEe, NOS. 1D0.201JCl2flOO224 '" 200J121()()(l16J7
32, TrRMS, CO.VlANIS, CONDIIIONS AND IIESIRICnONS CONTAIN{l) IN 8(JfIM; tAKfSHORf lANDING IlINOING Sin: PLm LUA-04-1IlI1-I1SP,
REC. NO, 2004122JOOO{l~6
6J, CO¥!.IIANrs. CONI)ITIONS, R£SIfflClIONS AND/OR fASfWfNTS, ReC, Na 2O(I41U800IBn
~., TEH~S A~D PROI'ISIO!IS CWTAIIiED IN ·SmllllDER AG'!ECloIfNr" 8flllUN THE IWCING r;;ouPANT AND 1H£ CITY Of' 1I£/oiTON, Rfe: NO
2006042oo010J2 (WNGACRES PROPERTY) (DOfS NOT AmCT SUBJECT PROPfRTY).
SCALE'
100 0 5~ fOO
k-sz-' :
( f~E:T )
1 I,\'CII = 100 FT
""-=
NO PROPERTr OORNfRS WlI, Ilf PLACED AS PART OF" !HIS aJ/lDlNll sPTf PlAN our TO FUTI.IRr: CQNSTRUCIION C0tI5ID£"ATIaNS.
TRACT '/I' IIItL 9£ RHAINiO IlY mE BOEING COI.IPANY.
BINDING SITE pI AN AR£AS·
coo SQ. FT. I~ LOT SA 61U>:)4 T<l.21
LOT .sa 2U,140 '.24
tOT .5C 161,027 ".
toT~ !68,lIJ ".
toT !if J$,817 '" tOT 7A 87,189 '.00
LOT 78 ~20,67J 3.07
LOT 7C 107.t12 2,;$
mACT R 1~,6B(l ,~
I" _ 100' .32614 J2614_SURV_BS01.OWG 1
m BOE!NG REALTY COMPANY
CITY OF RENTON
LAKESHORE LANDING 2 BINDING SITE PLAN
,
-~'~'~NC"~NC: l'~"~"'-· __ ,"';;-;"";-;;:o ____ "'o;-;;;;:",-c;!W~'~",,"~NG:;mN~ seA"~' PROJ[CT NO DRAWING FILE NAM[;
DESIGNED BY' CHECKED BY:
ORA WN BY' ~ APPROVED BY, __ _
LAST EDIT, az.Ll2U"Qz PLOT DATL 07/09/07
~ BY REV REVISION CK'D ~PPR
GfNFRA! PRO lEer orSCRIPTION-
ZO~INO
lIIIIJoj PACIFIC
JJ50 IIONlE: \oILLA PARKWAY
BOlH£I..L. WA 98Q21
PJ./ONf, (~~~) 9.51-4800
lIeNl (UJlSoIN C(IIJ[R NOllni)
REFERENCES
'" CITY OF RfNTON SHORT PLAT \.!..J BO£ItIlJ PARC(L J8
RfC, 110, 2001120!i900004
~
15,880 sq. t
0.38 acr .. s
-e-
I
SCALE
o 5f 100 I , :
(FEn)
1 iNCH _ 100 PT
l1
BOEING LAKESHORE LANDING 2
BINDING SITE PUN
SE 114 SECT. 7. nYP. 23N" RGE. SE.. W.M.
SW 114 SECT. 8, TWP. 23 N .• RGE, Sf.. W,M
CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
LOT 4A
CITY 01' R£NTOII LLA 0I!-O~7
HORIZONTAl' DAUJM'
NA0IJ3(Pl} WASfflNGTON STAn; CQOlWmAn; SYS/£I,I.
NORm ZON(, F710U CITY Of' ReliTON CONTIWI.
IIOMJIID-/TS. (NITS, US FE:fT
lIoti1JlIEIiTS SHO\ll'l )1£1/£ OISIn;o IN ftB. 2QQ4.
PRIIIAflY IlEASURC:llflir fQVlPlIoNT -IIIl11fBlf
~7(){1 Gf'S, A1IfJ WCA roTAL STATiONS HAVf BEEN
caMf'AACD TO A1IfJ A£M!sn;o AG,.O./I/Sr A SURVEY
CAtI8RAJ[O BASfllN( \ll1I~1I lHC LAST YEAR.
cay Of RENTON Sl!RllfY CONTROl'
TIES TO CiTY Of //filiON SVRVC'Y CONTROl. N£IWORK
JAONUll£NfS, AS SHOIIN 011 SHEETS 2 AM' ,
____ ,'!!l.9·28'06"W ________ .!2J~
CASEMrNT
,NO. JH21n
la_71 BUILDiNG
(VACANT -TO
gc: OfIlOUSl/CO)
lJ,B6!; SF
LOT 58
N 8th St.
LOT5A
619,004 sq. ff.
14.21 acres
LOT5E
PM-rKll-Ki QARACf
(70 fl(IIAJN)
98,726 SF
LOT5C
60EING REAL IT' COMPANY
C!TY OF RENTON
~"r~-~-
I i I ~~
LAKESHORE LANDING 2 BINDING SITE PLAN
RtNTON, KING
SeNE:
1" = 100'
PROJECT NO.
32814
ORM,1NG fiLE NAME'
J2614-SURV-SS01.DWG
[J
LOT,~:,L
DESIGNED BY: CHECKED BY:
DRAImBY: ~
LAS/fDIT:
DA IE BY R£V RfWSiON C/{'rJ
LOT 1A L
LOT JA
,
~IB
,
JO-8D
~ ~5E ,
PARKING
GARAGE:
LOT 5C
LOT 5A
LOT 7A
B
LOT 78
PARKING
GARAGE
LOT 7C
LOT 50
.~
EJ
RENTON, KING
SCALE:
," ~ 200'
,
SOEING REAL7Y COMPANY
LAKESHORE L.ANDlNG 2 BfNOING SITE" PI..AN
NEIGHBORHOOD MAP
PROJECT NO.
32614
~
~~~
I
SCALE
200 D '00 200 4DO ~~§.~~-~~;~~;~ .. ~!
( F"EET )
I INCH = 200 FT
n
>
~.
o
z
B. :A.IL-.AR.,EA o i.6;i5A _ _ _ _ ,_ :'12t1-kK
JUMORANCHC>RS ~2K
~AILSHOPS ,: .:.29.1*
';:fdtAt,SOj;T
1"OT~:PAAI<IN(3 _
RATIO (Tes j)$} 1~.~ It)
TO'f)l4:':SOI'T
TOTALPftRKll>:G
RATIO (273 pSI 69 ~ k)
BOEING REMAINDER
BUILDING 10-20
BUILDING 10-18
TOTAL SOFT
~Rl;(jI\lQ~RFACE.}
-pARKING:(STRllCl'1.1RE)
TOTAl. PAA'KiNi --,_
RAhO t2&tttps:{4il! k)-
Ov!;AALI.. SQfT -
OVERALL ~~Ilo!G: : ~ <
;~~>i,',_
, :7'lii,p~:'
"4,oJt.OOO,
1i9ik
-i78~S
'::(111,1]00
2074 k
210 f.k
418 k
m-p.;; -
f~5,t>s:
2001pS s.,m,OOJ)
7~.4-k
3.9-3S-ps
VIEW
~
VIE:!I
"I
SUB-DISTRICT 1 B MASTER SITE APPLICATION
Project # 206211-01
July 6th, ~OO7
III NEW RETAIL ANCHORS
~ NEW RETAIL SHOPS
~ NEW RESIDENTIAL
<I
CALliSON
• NEW STRUCTURED PARKING • NEW PAVING AND LANDSCAPING
• EXISTING OFFICE BUILDINGS
II EXISTING PARKING/SUPPORT BUILDINGS
EXISTING PAVING
N
0' 50 100' 20D' '00 C)
Site Plan -Retail Option
REt"iLAllSA ".LOT SA
'""""" JUNIORAN(;HORS
RE'TAIL SHOPS
TOTAlSOfol
TOTAl PA!'!l<ING
RATIO(7as~1 t96.)~!_
!!!1TAUREA; LOtta
JU~IORAI't(:H:ORS
RETAIL SHOPS
, TQTALSQFT
{~.4k -
40.2K
29.7.k
''igea:k.
-"te5~~:
4,(Yl,p®
, $a.h,
21,;6'1,..'
',6(;:..2'1;:
" ~TAL PAAKING _ ~ _~ g~,P_1\; MW ,j2i3$j)s1662k)' "4,r111;OOCl _
l~mAtAAEA."LOT "'!M""~
ft~A~ --18 k
-:~t!~f.CE PARKiNG
$TRuctuR£D PMKlNG _-
lOTM.."AfIIKING
BOeiNG REMAINDER
eUILO'NG 10 2lt
£!UILO'N{; 10·18
TOTALSOFr
FARKII'.'G (SdRFAC[",
PARkiNG (::; I f<UGW'RE)
TOTALPARKING
,'!"A"TJO ~60r po.! 4t6 k}
'7 ps ", i'l11i~
2!)7 4',
21J B <
418 k
B22 ;'.IS
19S5 >',
~ps
6.21tooo
ENLARGED VIEW
SUB-DISTRICT 1 B MASTER SITE APPLICATION
Project II 206211 01
July Sth, 2007
(j
CALLISON
R NEW RETAIL ANCHORS
It: NEW RETAIL SHOPS
~ NEW RESIDENTIAL
• NEW STRUCTURED PARKING
'! NEW PAVING AND LANDSCAPING
• EXISTING OFFICE BUILDINGS
~ EXISTING PARKING/SUPPORT BUILDINGS
EXISTING PAVING
N
0' so-100' 2CO' 'OC' Q)
Site Plan -Residential Option
SUB-DISTRICT 1B MASTER SITE APPLICATION
Projecl II z00211 (11
July 6th, 2007
e
CALLISON
NEW RETAIL ANCHORS •
NEW RETAIL SHOPS ~
NEW RESIDENTIAL m
NEW STRUCTURED PARKING •
NEW PAVING AND LANDSCAPING '!
EXISTING OFFICE BUILDINGS •
EXISTING PARKING/SUPPORT BUILDINGS m
EXISTING PAVING ;±;
VIEWB
3D Model -Retail Option II
SUB-DISTRICT.1 B MASTER SITE APPLICATION
Projee1II 2OS211.01
Juty 6th, 201]7
VIEWC
e
CAL.LISON
NEW RETAIL ANCHORS D
NEW RETAIL SHOPS ~
NEW RESIDENTIAL Ii
NEW STRUCTURED PARKING •
NEW PAVING AND LANDSCAPING .-'!
EXISTING OFFICE BUILDINGS •
EXISTING PARKING/SUPPORT BUILDINGS B
EXISTING PAVING
VIEW 0
3D Model -Residential Option
SUB-DISTRICT 1B MASTER SITE APPLICATION
ProjeCl # 2(}6211 01
.,Ju~ 51h, 2007
<I
CALLISON
NEW RETAIL ANCHORS •
NEW RETAIL SHOPS Ii
NEW RESIDENTIAL ~
NEW STRUCTURED PARKING •
NEW PAVING AND LANDSCAPING ~
EXISTING OFFICE BUILDINGS •
EXISTING PARKING/SUPPORT BUILDINGS l!I
EXISTING PAVING \@;
3D Model -Residential Option
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RENTON
Planning/Building/Public Works
MEMORANDUM
December 26, 2007
City Clerk's Office
Andrea Petzel P/B/~W -DevelopmenUPlafjning, '17270 t-M4jr 61 V7U(vl, stfe ~. 1M ((L{SiC.,
~'5 ',*e<A~i1t LUA 07-048
Attached please find two sets of the above-referenced mylar and three copies for recording with
King County.
Please have Consolidated Delivery & Logistics, Inc. take these documents via:
Priority service ($22.46)
Rush service ($17.94)
X Economy service ($17.97)
Attached is a check for the amount of $17.97 for the fee to CD&L.
According to Finance, the King County recording fees for this and all subsequent plat recordings
should be charged to account #0001007.5900060.49.000014. Please call me at x7270 if you
have any questions.
Thank you.
cc:
Jan Conklin, Development Services
Sonja Fesser, Property Services
H:\Oivision,s\Oevelop.ser\Dev&plan.ing\AAP\Lot Line Adjustment\S Clerk Memo.doc
CITY
LUfb1-oc-f~
F RENTON
PlanningiBuildinglPublic Works Department
. Gregg Zimmerman P .E., Administrator
Jim Purkey
W&H Pacific
3350 Monte Villa Pkwy
Bothell, WA 98021
SUBJECT: Lakeshore Landing 2 Binding Site Plan
File No. LUA07-048, BSP
Dear Mr. Purkey:
The City of Renton has finished reviewing your proposed binding site plan and is now
ready to approve subject to some minor revisions being made and send the final version
for recording. Please make the following revisions:
1. The "DNISION OF RECORDS AND ELECTIONS" block should be removed
from Sheet 1 of 3.
2. The "KING COUNTY FINANCE DNISIONCERTIFICATION" block is not
needed. Remove from the drawing (Sheet 1 00).
Please submit two sets of original signed mylars and a check for $17.97 made out to
Velocity Express. I would like to let you know that! will be leaving the City of Rent{)n
and my last day is December 7th , Andrea Petzel will be the planner taking over this
project for ine once I am gone. Please submit the mylars to Andrea's attention at the 6th
floor counter of City Hall.
Please verify that the mylars have been signed by all owners of record and have been
notarized with an ink stamp (not embossed). The ink stamp must be legible so that
King County will promptly record the lot line adjustment.
This decision to approve the proposed lot line adjustment is subject to a fourteen (14) day
appeal period from the date ofthisletter. Any appeals of the administrative decision
must be. filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5 :00 pm, December 18,2007.
Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with:
Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055.
Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-
110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the
Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510.
------------1-O-55-S-o-u-ili-G-rnd--y-w-a-y---R-eD~to-D-,W--as-h-iD-gt-on--98-0-5-7------~----~
@ this paper contains 50% recyded m~erial, 3~% ~consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE
If you have further questions regarding this project, please call me at (425) 430-7219 or
Andrea at( 425) 430-7270.
Sincerely,
Mid)
4hIK.Ding ~
Senior Planner
cc: JeffreyAdelsonl ApplicarttJO\\'ller/Contact
Jeimifer L..Schorr
Yellow file
Page 1 : -------~----------.. -----~~~'--
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Hi Jill,
Sonja Fesser
Ding, Jill
12/03/20073:47:21 PM
Re: Boeing Lakeshore Landing 2 Binding Site Plan
Yes, I concur. I mentioned to Bob that said lots were probably to remain with Boeing, but he said to pose
the question to the applicant anyway. Bob is not in today_ Can you wait until tomorrow to ask him if
anything needs to be done to make the access issue more explicit on the drawing? Thanks.
Sonja
»> Jill Ding 12/03/07 2:57 PM »>
Sonja,
In your approval of this BSP you asked how access to Lot 5E is proposed? I talked with Boeing about this
and they plan to retain ownership of Lot 5E and Lots 5C and 5C to the south. Access would be provided
over these lots to Lot 5E, they indicated that since they were retaining ownership of these parcels, an
access easement is not necessary. Do you concur?
October 30, 2007
Jennifer L. Schorr
Perkins Coie
1201 Third Avenue #4800
Seattle, W A 98101
SUBJECT: Landing 2 Master Plan
LUA07-048, SA-M, BSP
Dear Ms. Schorr:
CIT.OF RENTON
Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department
Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator
This letter is to inform you that the appeal period has ended for the Administrative decisions
approving the Master Plan and Binding Site Plan. No appeals were filed, therefore, these
decisions are final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed.
The advisory notes and conditions of approval listed in the City of Renton Report and Decision
dated September 12, 2007 must be adhered to during construction and prior to final inspection.
If you have any questions regarding the report and decision issued for the Master Plan and
Binding Site Plan, please call me at (425) 430-7219.
Sincerely,
. LjdJ 1{, :i27J' ~~ill K. Ding .
Senior Planner
co: Jeffrey Adelson -The Boeing Company / Owner
Nora Schultz, Gary Riffle, Melinda Webb, Dan Allem / Parties of Record
i
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING / BUILDING / PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
Date: October 30, 2007
To: City Clerk's Office
From: Stacy Tucker
Subject: Land Use File Closeout
Please complete the following information to faCilitate project closeout and indexing by the City
Clerk's Office
Project Name: Landing 2 Master Plan
LUA (file) Number: LUA-07-048, SA-M, BSP
Cross-References: I
LUA05-136; 06-004; 06-057 ;06-068; 06-069;06-071 ;06-077 ;07 -031; 07-037;07-
053;07-066
AKA's: Sub-District 1B Master Plan and Boeing Lakeshore Landing 2
Binding Site Plan
Project Manager: Jill Ding
Acceptance Date: May 22,2007
Applicant: The Boeing Company
Owner: The Boeing Company
Contact: Jeffrey Adelson, The Boeing Company
PID Number: 0886600050; 7223000105; 0823059209; 0823059019;
7223000115
ERC Decision Date:
ERC Appeal Date:
Administrative Approval: BSP: August 15, 2007 Master Plan: September 12, 2007
Appeal Period Ends: BSP:August29,2007 Master Plan: September 26, 2007
Validity clarification decision appeal period ends: October 10, 2007
Public Hearing Date:
Date Appealed to HEX:
By Whom:
HEX Decision: Date:
Date Appealed to Council:
By Whom:
Council Decision: Date:
Mylar Recording Number:
Project Description: The applicant Is requesting Master Site Plan approval and Binding Site Plan approval. The
subject Site totals approximately 42 acres In area and is located within the Urban Center North - 1 (UCN-1) zoning
designation. The proposal would result in the creation of 8 additional lots on the project site. Three of the lots are proposed
for redevelopment with retail and/or multi family residential. If the lots were redeveloped with only retail the project would
result in the construction of approximately 332,400 square feet of retail space. If the project site .were developed with a
combination of mutl family residential and retail the project would result In the construction of 280,500 square feet of retail
and 461 500 sauare feet of residential.,
Location: 1002 Park Avenue N
Comments:
.,-
PARTIES OF RECORD
LANDING 2 MASTER PLAN
LUA07-048, SA-M, BSP
Gary Riffle
16846 188th Avenue SE
Renton, WA 98058
tel: (425) 226-6867
(party of record)
Melinda Webb
541 Wells Avenue N
Renton, WA 98057
tel: (425) 277-8932
eml:
paulandmelindawebb@comcast.net
(party of record)
Updated: 10/30107
Dan Allem
19233 14th Avenue NE
Shoreline, WA 98155
(party of record)
Jeffrey Adelson
Boeing Realty Corp.
M/C 6R6-10, Triton Tower
700 S Renton Village Place
Renton, WA 98055
tel: (206) 650-5960
eml:
jeffrey. r. adelson@boeing.com
(owner / applicant / contact)
Nora Schultz
536 Williams Avenue N
Renton, WA 98057
(party of record)
Jennifer L. Schorr
Perkins Coie
1201 Third Avenue ste: #4800
Seattle, WA 98101
tel: (206) 359-6116
eml: jschorr@perkinscoie.com
(party of record)
(Page 1 of 1)
September 26, 2007
Jennifer L. Schorr
Perkins Coie
1201 Third Avenue, Suite4800
Seattle, WA98101-3099
CITY ,F RENTON
Planning/Building/Public Works Department
Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator
RE: Sub-District IB Master Plan and Boeing Lakeshore Landing 2 Binding Site Plan
Approval (LUA07-048) Clarification Request
Dear Ms. Schorr:
I have received your request for clarification as to the expiration of the Sub-District 18
Master Plan. In your request you reference the application materials, which requested an
approval period of 5 years for the Sub-District 18 Master Plan. The decision approving
the Sub-District 18 Master Plan and Lakeshore Landing 2 Binding Site Plan, issued
September 12, 2007, did not include a validity period. This was an unintended omission,
the intention was to approve the Sub-District IB Master Plan for the requested validity
period.of 5 years. Therefore, the approval of the Sub-District 18 Master Plan shall be
valid for a period of5 years; which will expire onSeptember 12,2012.
This decision to clarify the validity period for the Sub-District· 18 Master Plan is subject
to a fourteen (14) day appeal period from the date ofthis letter. Any appeals of the
. administrative' decision must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5 :00
pm, October 10, 2007.Ifyouhave further questions, feel free to contact Jill Ding, Senior.
Planner at (425) 430-7219.
Sincerely, ,
~-eutkU~~:
Neil Watts, Director
Development Services Division
cc LUA07-048 File
Jeffrey Adelson, Boeing.Realty Corp,
--------,-. ~10-5-5 -So-u-th":'Grad-~y-w-a-Y---Re-n-to-n-, -w-as-h-in-g-to":'n-9-80-5-7-~---'--'--c-" .~ * This papercQn1ains 50% recycled matenal, 30.% poStcor'ISUri1er
AHEAD O'F THE CURVE
Jennifer L. SchQrr
PHONE (206) 359·6116
FAX (206) 359·7116
EMAIL: JSchorr@perkinscoie.com
September 21, 2007
VIA FACSIMILE AND FIRST CLASS MAIL
Mr. Neil Watts
Development Services Director
City of Renton
1055 S. Grady Way
Renton, W A 98057
DEVB.OPMENT 1>1 A ...... ~
CiTY OF RENr'ON-
SEP 2!'t 2007
RECEIVED
Re: Approval of LUA-07-048IRequest for Clarification
Dear Neil:
Perkins I
Coie
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4800
Seattle, WA 98101-3099
PHONE: 206.359.8000
FAX: 206.359.9000
www.perkinscoie.com
In the Project Narrative required as part of the application for the Boeing Sub-District 18 Master
Plan and Lakeshore Landing 2 Binding Site Plan referenced above, Boeing requested approval of
the Master Plan for a period of five years from the date of approval, pursuant to RMC 4·9-200 L.
The decision approving the Master Plan and Binding Site Plan, issued September 12,2007, does
not address the Master Plan validity period. It is our understanding, based on a discussion with
Jill Ding, that the City approves the requested five year validity period and intended to include
reference to that aspect of Master Plan approval in the decision. We would appreciate the City's
written clarification that the Master Plan is valid for a five year period, ending September 12,
2012.
Thank you very much for your assistance, and please do not hesitate to contact me with any
questions.
Very truly yours,
~~::~
cc: Jill Ding
Jeffrey Adelson
Janene Collins
Laura Whitaker
03003-0 166ILEGAL 13582023.1
ANCHORAGE· BEIJING· BELLEVUE· BOISE CHICAGO, DENVER· LOS ANGELES· MENLO PARK
OLYMPIA· PHOENIX· PORTLAND· SAN FRANCISCO· SEATTlE -SHANGHAI· WASHINGTON, D.C.
Perkins Coif' u.r and Affiliates
REPORT City of Renton
&
Department of Planning / Building / Public Works
DECISION A DMINISTRA TlVE LAND USE ACTION
DATE: September 12,2007
Project Name: Master Plan for SUb-District 1 B and Binding Site Plan for Boeing Lakeshore
Landing 2
Owner/Applicant! Jeffrey Adelson, The Boeing Corp., MIC 6R6-10, Triton Tower, 700 S Renton
Contact: Village Place, Renton, WA 98055
Fife Number: LUA-07-048, SA-M, BSP
Project Manager: Jill K. Ding, Senior Planner
Project Description: The applicant is requesting Master Site Plan approval and Binding Site Plan
approval. The subject site totals approximately 42 acres in area and is located
within the Urban Center North - 1 (UCN-1) zoning designation. The proposal
would result in the creation of 8 additional lots on the project site. Three of the
lots are proposed for redevelopment with retail, andlor multi family residential.
If the lots were redeveloped with only retail the project would result in the
construction of approximately 332,400 square feet of retail space. If the
project site were developed with a combination of multi-family residential and
retail the project would result in the construction of 280,500 square feet of
retail and 461,500 square feet of residential (360 dwelling units) (continued.
on next page),
Project Location: South of N 8th Street, north of N 6th Street, between Logan Avenue NE and
Garden Avenue NE
Exist. Bldg. Area SF: 418,000 sq. fl. Proposed New Bldg. Area 332,400 sq. ft. (retail option)
SF 742,000 sq. ft. (residential
over retail option)
Site Area: Approx.42 Total Building Area SF on 750,400 sq. ft. (retail option)
acres site,': 1,160,000 sq. fl. (residential
over retail option)
Project Location Map Master Site and Binding Site Plan Rpt 07-04B.doc
City of Renton PIB/PW Department
MASTER PLAN FOR SUB-DISTRICT, : BINDING SITE PLAN FOR LAKESHORE L ., .L.'ING 2
REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 12, 2007
II PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND
Administrative Report
LUA-07-048, SA-M, SSP
Page 2 of 17
An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed redevelopment uses and density range
was completed in October 2003. The site was analyzed in the EIS as Sub-District 1 B of the total
Boeing property area that was to be made available for redevelopment. The project site and
potential redevelopment was the subject of a Planned Action Ordinance (5242) dated December 11,
2006, a Development Agreement dated December 1, 2003, entered into between the City of Renton
and The Boeing Company, and a Conceptual Plan dated November 14, 2005. A consistency
analysis was prepared by Blumen Consulting Group, Inc., dated May, 2006, which reviewed the
project's consistency with the EIS, and concluded that it met the conditions and calculated impacts
associated with the range of development alternatives analyzed in the EIS. A Planned Action
determination was issued for the Master Plan on August 16, 2007. Further environmental review is
not required unless development is proposed that is inconsistent with the EIS, and/or additional
environmental impacts are identified.
Per RMC 4-9-200, the purpose of the Master Plan process is to guide phased planning of
development projects with multiple buildings on a single large site. The Master Plan is required to
demonstrate how the major elements of a development are proposed on the site at sufficient detail
to demonstrate the overall project concept. In addition, the Master Plan must illustrate how the major
project elements, combined, create an urban environment that implements City goals. An additional
purpose is to allow consideration and mitigation of potential impacts that could result from large-
scale site and facility development, and to allow coordination with City capital improvement planning.
Master Plan review should occur at an early stage in the development of a project, when the scale,
intensity and layout of a project are known. Projects are reviewed at a broad level for the Master
Plan, and with increased specificity as development plans becomes refined to the level of Site Plan
review.
A Master Plan may be approved without a public hearing when (a) one or more public hearings were
held where public comment was solicited on the proposed Planned Action Ordinance, and (b) the
EIS for the planned action reviewed preliminary conceptual plans for the site which provided the
public and decision-makers with sufficient detail regarding the scale of the proposed improvements,
the quantity of the various types of spaces to be provided, the use to which the structure will be put,
and the bulk and general form of the improvements. A public hearing for the EIS was held on July
30, 2003. The Master Plan for Sub-District 1 B complies with both of the above requirements, and
therefore qualifies for administrative approval. Subsequent Site Plans may also be submitted and
approved administratively without a public hearing.
The UC-N1 zone requires Master Plan review for the proposed development. A Master Plan within
this zone must be consistent with the relevant conceptual plan and development agreement for the
location. The Master Plan for Sub-District 1 B has been developed in accordance with these
guidelines. Requirements of the UC-N1 zone are further addressed in the Development Standards
and Comprehensive Plan sections of this report.
The project site is currently occupied by industrial, office, engineering, and lab buildings as well as
surface parking lots and structured parking garages. The proposed Master Plan is comprised of
three parts (Retail Area, Retail/Residential Area, and Boeing Remainder). The Retail Area (lots 5A
and 7B of the Binding Site Plan) totals approximately 19.33 acres and is located on the northern
portion of the property along 8th Avenue, is available for near-term redevelopment. Lot 7B of the
Retail Area is also under consideration for development as a transit facility. The Residential/Retail
Area (lot 5B of the Binding Site Plan) totals approximately 5.19 acres and is proposed for near-term
redevelopment of a small retail village or a residential over retail development. The Boeing
Remainder makes up the southern portion of Sub-District 18. It contains 418,000 square feet of
Master Site and Binding Site Plan Rpt 07-04S.doc
City of Renton PIBIPW Department
MASTER PLAN FOR SUB-DISTRICT. & BINDING SITE PLAN FOR LAKESHORE L. ... .JING 2
REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 12. 2007
Administrative Report
LUA-07-048, SA-M, BSP
Page30f17
existing office and laboratory space and approximately 3.86 acres of land with future redevelopment
potential which is unlikely to occur before 2016.
II PART TWO: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION -REPORT & DECISION
A_ Type of Land Use Action
XX Master Site Plan Review Shoreline
Permit
Substantial Development
Conditional Use XX Binding Site Plan
Special Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative Code Determination
B. Exhibits
The following exhibits are entered into the record:
Exhibit No.1:
Exhibit No.2:
Exhibit NO.3:
Exhibit NO.4:
Exhibit NO.5:
Exhibit NO.6:
Exhibit NO.7:
Exhibit NO.8:
Exhibit NO.9:
Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental
review and other pertinent documentation.
Neighborhood Detail Map. dated December 26, 2006
Aerial Context Map. dated July 6th , 2007
Site Plan -Retail Option, dated July 6th 2007
Site Plan -Residential Option, dated July 6th 2007
Boeing Renton Sub-District 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis by Blumen
Consulting Group, Inc., dated May, 2006
Development Agreement. dated December 1, 2003
Conceptual Plan, dated October 3, 2005
Planned Action determination, dated August 15, 2007
C. Staff and Consultant Review Comments
Representatives from various City departments and consultants contracted by the City have
reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues regarding the proposed
development. A consistency analysis was prepared by Blumen Consulting Group, Inc., to compare
Master Plan for Sub-District 1 B with the EIS, and its findings are referenced throughout this report.
All of these comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been
incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Decision at the end of the report.
Several staff and consultant review memoranda are also included as exhibits to this report.
D. Consistency with Master Site Plan Approval Criteria
The UC-N1 zoning of the development site triggers a requirement to prepare a Master Plan per
RMC 4-9-200.A.1, to be approved prior to or concurrent with Site Plan Approval. RMC 4-9-200.A.1.
states that "The purpose of the Master Plan process is to guide phased planning of development
projects with multiple buildings on a single large site. The Master Plan is required to demonstrate
how the major elements of a development are proposed on the site at sufficient detail to
demonstrate the overall project concept. In addition, the Master Plan must illustrate how the major
project elements, combined, create an urban environment that implements City goals. An additional
purpose is to allow consideration and mitigation of potential impacts that could result from large-
scale site and facility development, and to allow coordination with City capital improvement
planning."
Master Site and Binding Site Plan Rpt 07·048.doc
City of Renton PIBIPW Department
MASTER PLAN FOR SUB-DISTRICT. & BINDING SITE PLAN FOR LAKESHORE L~ .. _ING 2
Administrative Report
LUA-07-048, SA-M, SSP
REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 12, 2007 Page 4 of 17
The following criteria are required to be met through the Site Plan and Master Plan Review Process,
consistent with RMC 4-9-200E.:
a_ Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements, goals, objectives, and
policies. In determining compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, conformance to the
objectives and policies of the specific land use designation shall be given
consideration over city-wide objectives and policies;
The consistency analysis prepared by Blumen Consulting Group, Inc., dated May, 2006,
included an assessment of the project's consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan,
and found the project to be consistent with the relevant Comprehensive Plan requirements.
The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map deSignation for the site is Urban Center North. The
following Comprehensive Plan policies are applicable to the Master Site Plan proposal:
Policy LU-200. Allow residential uses throughout Centers as part of mixed-use
developments. Consider bonus incentives for housing types compatible with commercial
uses or lower density residential that is adjacent to Centers.
Policy LU-201. Include uses that are compatible with each other within mixed-use
developments; for example, office and certain retail uses with residential, office, and retail.
Policy LU-208. Consolidate access to existing streets and provide internal vehicular
circulation that supports shared access.
Policy LU-210. Connect residential uses to other uses in the Center through design features
such as pedestrian access, shared parking areas, and common open spaces.
Policy LU-214: Support developments that utilize Urban Center levels of capacity.
Where market conditions do not support Urban Center employment and residential levels,
support site planning and/or phasing alternatives that demonstrate how, over time, infill or
redevelopment can meet Urban Center objectives.
Policy LU-21S. Site and building design should be pedestrian/people oriented with
provisions for transit and automobiles where appropriate.
Policy LU-272. Support uses that serve the region, a sub-regional, or citywide market as
well as the surrounding neighborhoods.
Policy LU-273. Support integration of community-scale office and service uses including
restaurants, theaters, day care, art museums and studios.
Policy LU-280. Use a hierarchy of conceptual plan, master plan and site plan review and
approval to encourage the cohesive development of large land areas within the Urban
Center. Incorporate integrated design regulations into this review process.
Policy LU-281. Address the mix and compatibility of uses, residential density, conceptual
building, site and landscape design, identification of gateway features, signs, circulation,
transit opportunities, and phasing through master plan and site plan review process.
Policy LU-28S. Consider placement of structures and parking areas in initial redevelopment
plans to facilitate later infill development at higher densities and intensities over time.
Policy LU-293. Support a mix of activities within the Urban Center -North designation that
support populations in adjacent residential areas as well as new development within the re-
development area. Examples of uses that serve the needs of existing populations include
neighborhood-scale retail that addresses the day-to-day needs of residents, restaurants and
coffee houses, public facilities, and places of assembly such as parks and plazas.
Policy LU-300. Encourage the placement of buildings for retail tenants along pedestrian-
oriented streets to create urban configurations.
Policy LU-301. Ensure that big-box retail functions as an anchor to larger, cohesive, urban-
scale retail developments.
Policy LU-302. Encourage a variety of architectural treatments and styles to create an urban
environment.
Master Site and Binding Site Plan Rpt 07-048.doc
City of Renton PIBlPW Department
MASTER PLAN FOR SUB-DISTRICT & BINDING SITE PLAN FOR LAKESHORE L ... 'ING 2
REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 12. 2007
Administrative Report
LUA-07-048, SA-M, asp
Page 5 of 17
The Master Plan is consistent with the above Comprehensive Plan policies. Further review
will be required during Site Plan review for individual development components. Additional
Comprehensive Plan policies will also pertain to Site Plan review.
b. Conformance with existing land use regulations;
The subject site is zoned Urban Center North - 1 (UC-N1). The UC-N1 zone was envisioned
as an area with a broad range of redevelopment uses in a dense employment center,
including but not limited to retail uses integrated into pedestrian-oriented shopping districts,
and a range of urban-scale mixed-use residential, office, entertainment and commercial
uses. A mix of both larger destination-retail stores and small specialty retail stores are
encouraged. Residential development should be in low-to mid-rise buildings that
incorporate upper-story office and/or ground-related retail uses where appropriate. The
proposal for residential development with ground-level retail, and range of retail stores,
entertainment and restaurants within the interlinked areas of the site complies with these
requirements.
Development Standards
Lot Coverage -The UC-N1 zone limits lot coverage by buildings to a maximum of 90% of the
lot area, or 100% if parking is provided within the building. The proposed Master Plan would
result in the following lot coverage: 32 percent on Lot 5A, a maximum of 41 percent on Lot
5B, 69 percent on Lot 5C, none is proposed on Lot 5D (a surface parking lot is proposed to
remain), 57 percent on Lot 5E, 30 percent on Lot 7 A, 30 percent on Lot 7B, and 70 percent
on Lot 7C. The proposal would comply with the maximum lot coverage requirements, further
review of lot coverage would occur during the Site Plan review process.
Lot Size -The minimum lot size required in the UC-N1 zone is 25 acres, however the
minimum lot size can be amended through the Site Plan review process. The applicant has
requested an amendment to the minimum lot size requirement to permit the subdivision of
the project site into lots with the following sizes: Lot 5A at 14.21 acres, Lot 5B at 5.24 acres,
Lot 5C at 4.16 acres, Lot 5D at 3.86 acres, Lot 5E at 0.84 acres, Lot 7A at 2.00 acres, Lot 7B
at 5.07 acres, and Lot 7C at 2.46 acres. The requested Master Site Plan review is being
conducted concurrently with the Binding Site Plan review and it appears that the proposed
Master Plan would result in a cohesive retail development that will be developed over time
and would qualify for lot sizes smaller than 25 acres. The UC-N1 zone does not mandate
specific lot dimensions.
Setbacks -The UC-N1 zone does not require a minimum front yard or side yard along a
street setback; however, a five-foot maximum setback is required. No rear or side yard
setbacks are required. Based on the submitted Master Site Plan, it appears that the
proposed retail buildings would comply with the setback requirements. The applicant
requested a modification from the maximum 5-foot front yard setback requirement for the
residential over retail buildings proposed on Lot 5 B in order to accommodate an existing
utility easement running north-south along the west end of the property, and for the existing
buildings proposed to remain on Lots 5C, 7 A, and 7C. A modification is not needed for the
existing buildings proposed to remain on Lots 5C, 7 A. and 7C as the current setback from
the streets is an existing situation that will not be made worse by the approval of the Binding
Site Plan.
RMC 4-9-250D provides that where practical difficulties exist in the implementation of the
regulations, a modification from the standards may be granted, provided the proposal
addresses the following criteria:
Master Site and Binding Site Plan Rpt 07-048_doc
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Report
LUA-07-048, SA-M, SSP MASTER PLAN FOR SUB-DISTRICT ~ . BINDING SITE PLAN FOR LAKESHORE L ... ING 2
REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 12, 2007 Page 601 17
a. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and
maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering
judgment; and
The proposal to exceed the maximum 5-foot front yard setback for the residential over
retail option proposed on Lot 5B would meet the objectives and safety, function,
appearance, environmental protection, and maintainability intended by the Code
requirements as it would allow for the construction of a 4-5 story mixed-use building on
the project site, while protecting utilities located within an easement along the west
property line.
b. Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; and
The proposal to exceed the maximum 5-foot front yard setback for the residential over
retail option proposed on Lot 5B would not injure other surrounding properties. The
increased setback would move the building farther back from Logan Avenue N onto the
east side of the property away from surrounding properties.
c. Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and
See previous discussion under a.
d. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and
The proposal to exceed the maximum 5-foot front yard setback for the residential over
retail option on proposed Lot 5B is justified as an existing utility easement, which
prohibits building over it is located over the west portion of the project site.
e. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(s) in the vicinity.
See previous discussion under b.
The location of a utility easement over the western portion of the property results in a
practical difficulty for the construction of the residential over retail building proposed as one
option on Lot 5B of the Binding Site Plan an appears to comply with the above criteria.
Therefore staff recommends approval of a modification to the maximum 5-foot front yard
setback requirement for the residential over retail option proposed on Lot 5B of the Binding
Site Plan.
c_ Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses;
Among other issues, the EIS analyzed potential onsite and offsite impacts in the following
categories:
• Stormwater
• Land use patterns
• Transportation
• Earth
• Water resources
• Groundwater
• Shoreline habitat and fisheries
• Upland habitat and wildlife
• Hazardous materials
• Population, employment and housing
• Parks and recreation
• Aesthetics (light and glare)
• Noise
• Public Services
• Utilities
Master Site and Binding Site Plan Rpt 07-048.doc
City of Renton P/B/PW Department
MASTER PLAN FOR SUB-DISTRICT __ BINDING SITE PLAN FOR LAKESHORE L ... _ING 2
REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 12, 2007
• Air Quality
Administrative Report
LUA-07-048, SA-M, BSP
Page 7 of 17
The Blumen Consulting Group's consistency analysis concluded that the Master Plan does
not propose any changes to the development scope addressed in the EIS that would create
additional adverse impacts. The proposed project will be compatible with existing and future
surrounding uses as permitted in the UC-N1 zone. Additional analysis of the development
regarding these requirements will take place during Site Plan review.
The proposed development will not result in proposed structures or site layouts that would
impair the use or enjoyment to surrounding uses and structures in the neighboring
community. Based on the Master Plan proposal, none of the structures will exceed UC-N1
development standards for size, bulk, height and intensity. Pedestrian and vehicular access
design standards in the Urban Design Regulations are applicable to the site and appear to
be adequate to serve the proposed development and provide transitions to the adjacent
neighborhood. The site will incorporate landscaping, screening and other means to
coordinate the development with the surrounding area and provide an aesthetic benefit.
Vehicular parking and pedestrian-oriented areas will be designed to promote efficient, safe
and integrated service throughout the site. The Urban Design Regulations, as applied to
specific layouts during Site Plan Review, will ensure visual compatibility with surrounding
uses, including design and location of lighting.
Within the site, building placement and spacing appear adequate to provide for privacy and
noise reduction (residential over retail option), orientation to views and site amenities,
sunlight and air, and pedestrian and vehicle needs. Based on the Master Plan proposal, the
placement and scale of proposed structures will not result in an over concentration of
buildings or the impression of oversized structures within the overall scale of development.
Open space and street frontages within the site will be landscaped, with additional
recreational area and open space provided within the residential component for use and
enjoyment by the residents.
Construction activities would result in short-term noise and dust on the site which could also
affect surrounding properties, limited to the period of the project's construction. The
applicant is required to submit a construction mitigation plan with Site Plan Review for
approval prior to issuance of any building or construction permit to verify the truck/haul routes
and note any other provisions related to construction activities.
d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site;
Detailed review of the project design will occur at the Site Plan level. Based on the
conceptual layout of the site it appears that landscaping will be proposed around the project
site to buffer the retail/residential buildings, and parking lots from the surrounding street
system as well as the Boeing manufacturing operations and Paccar, which are adjacent to
the east and west sides of the project site. Additional landscaping is proposed within the
surface parking areas to break up the large surface parking areas and provide additional
weather protection to vehicles and pedestrians.
Pedestrian pathways through the surface parking lots will be required and additional
pedestrian connections will be required to ensure the safety of pedestrians as they maneuver
through the parking lot from either their car to the retail shops or from retail shop to retail
shop.
e. Conservation of area wide property values;
The proposal would redevelop surplus Boeing properties and is expected to increase
property values in the vicinity of the site. The new development would provide improvements
to enhance the existing site and attract customers on a regional basis and under the
residential over retail option would attract additional residents.
Master Site and Binding Site Plan Rpt 07-048.doc
City of Renton PIBIPW Department
MASTER PLAN FOR SUB-DISTRICJ& BINDING SITE PLAN FOR LAKESHORE L ... JING 2
REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 12, 2007
f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation;
Administrative Report
WA-07-Q4B, SA-M, BSP
Page 8 of 17
The Sub-District 1 B development would utilize existing streets for access (Logan Avenue N,
N 8th Street, Park Avenue N, Garden Avenue N, and N 6th Street), in addition a future mid-
block east-west connection is proposed that would connect Logan Avenue N with Park
Avenue N. This connection may be developed at a later date once the existing data hub is no
longer needed and is removed from the project site.
The surface parking lots are concentrated in 3 main areas through out the site with
pedestrian pathways through the parking lots and pedestrian connections throughout the site
allowing pedestrians to walk safely from retail building to retail building. A pedestrian
pathway through two of the buildings connecting the Landing Development to the north to N
8th Street is currently being developed. To facilitate a pedestrian connection between Sub-
District 1 B and the Landing, staff recommends as a condition of approval that a pedestrian
connection be provided across N 8th Street into the proposed development. A plan showing
the pedestrian connection shall be provided at the time of Site Plan application for review
and approval.
It appears that adequate pedestrian and vehicular separation would be provided and vehicles
and pedestrians would safely be able to navigate through the site. New roads and road
improvements (including sidewalks and other pedestrian pathways and crossings) will be
further evaluated at the Site Plan level for compliance with the land use objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan for the UCN designation, the City's road and development standards
for the UC-N1 zone, and the Urban Design Regulations.
As part of the Blumen Company's consistency analysis, a separate transportation
consistency analysis was prepared by Transportation Engineering Northwest, LLC, dated
5/1/2006. This analysis addressed consistency with the transportation element of the EIS,
and specifically with the land use and trip generation assumptions that were used to evaluate
transportation impacts of the proposed redevelopment. The transportation consistency
analysis indicated that estimated overall trip generation rates of the Sub-District 1 B Master
Plan are substantially less than the traffic demand levels used to evaluate traffic impacts and
develop mitigation in the EIS. There would be no differences in probable significant traffic
impacts or mitigation needs from the proposed Sub-District 1 B development beyond those
previously assumed in the EIS. The Master Plan for the Sub-District 1 B proposal is within
the capacity of the range of development alternatives and associated impacts addressed in
the EIS.
The Transportation Planning Section will conduct additional review of potential construction-
related impacts during Site Plan review for The Landing development, and prior to issuing
final construction permits.
The proposed Master Plan is consistent with requirements for vehicle and pedestrian
circulation as provided in City code, and as evaluated in the EIS. More detailed review will
be required as part of the Site Plan review process.
g_ Provision of adequate light and air;
The Master Plan development proposal for the Sub-District 1 B is not anticipated to create
any conditions of inadequate light and air for residential or commercial structures, tenants or
customers. More detailed review of the height, orientation, location, proximity and access of
proposed buildings and surrounding areas will be required as part of the Site Plan review
process. Safety and security provided by onsite lighting will also be reviewed at that time.
h_ Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions;
It is anticipated that the most significant noise, odor and other potentially harmful impacts
would occur during the construction phase of the project. The development is expected to
generate noise from normal commercial and retail uses that will not exceed thresholds
Master Site and Binding Site Plan Rpt 07-Q48.doc
City ot Renton PIB/PW Department
MASTER PLAN FOR SUB-DISTRICT
REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 12, 2007
BINDING SITE PLAN FOR LAKESHORE L ... ING 2
Administrative Report
LUA-07-04B, SA-M, asp
Page 90t 17
anticipated in the EIS or impact surrounding properties. More detailed review will be required
as part of the Site Plan review process. The applicant is required to submit a Construction
Mitigation Plan for approval prior to obtaining construction permits.
i. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and
The EIS evaluated potential impacts to public services (including fire, police, schools and
emergency services) and utilities (water, sewer, stormwater) and established mitigation
measures. The Blumen Consulting Group's consistency analysis concluded that no changes
are proposed to the development scope addressed in the EIS that would create additional
adverse impacts to public services and facilities as a result of the Sub-District 1 B
development proposal.
There are existing utilities and street improvements on and around the site. There is a 12-
inch water main in N 8th Street, a 12-inch water main in Logan Avenue N, a 12-inch water
main in Park Avenue N, and a 12-inch water main in N 6th Street. There is a 24-inch sewer
main in N 6th Street, and a 12-inch sewer main in N 8th Street. Two sewer stubs have been
provided at the north property line. In addition, there is a 96-inch Metro sewer main running
north and south on the west side of the project site in the general location of 3 small retail
buildings proposed on Lot 5B as a part of the retail option.
Utilities are required to be installed and extended as necessary to the proposed development
by the applicant as required by City Code. Additional review of public services and facilities,
including sizing and placement of underground utilities, will be conducted as part of the Site
Plan review process for individual development components of Sub-District 1 B.
j, Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight.
The proposed redevelopment of Sub-District 1 B is not anticipated to result in neighborhood
deterioration and blight. The proposed development will bring a mix of new retail, restaurant
and possibly residential amenities and a transit facility into the Sub-District 1 B area and is
anticipated to enhance property values in the surrounding area.
E. Additional Site Plan Review Criteria (RMC 4-9-200)
The following site plan review criteria provided in RMC 4-9-200 are applicable to the Master Plan for
Sub-District 1 B:
a. The plan is consistent with a Planned Action Ordinance, if applicable.
As indicated in the Planned Action determination dated August 15, 2007 (Exhibit 5), the
Master Plan is consistent with the Planned Action Ordinance dated December 11, 2006.
b. The plan creates a compact, urban development that includes a compatible mix of
uses that meets the Comprehensive Plan vision and policy statements for the Urban
Center North Comprehensive Plan designation.
The current Master Plan represents the first phase of redevelopment on site. It is anticipated
that future development of the site will result in a more compact, urban development. As
indicated above in Section D, the Master Plan is consistent with Comprehensive Plan
requirements for the UCN land use.
c. The plan provides an overall urban design concept that is internally consistent, and
provides quality development.
As previously discussed above, the current Master Plan represents the first phase of
development on the site and it is anticipated that further development of the site will occur in
the future that will be more compact and urban in form. During the Site Plan review of the
project, the proposal will be reviewed for consistency with City's Urban Center Design
requirements to ensure quality development.
Master Site and Binding Site Plan Rpt 07-048.doc
City of Renton PIBIPW Department
MASTER PLAN FOR SUB-DISTRICj & BINDING SITE PLAN FOR LAKESHORE L. ... .JING 2
REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 12. 2007
Administrative Report
LUA-07-048, SA-M, BSP
Page 10 Df 17
d. The plan incorporates public and private open spaces to provide adequate areas for
passive and active recreation by the occupantslusers of the site, andlor to protect
existing natural systems;
The proposed Master Plan incorporates private open space within the residential option
proposed on Lot 5B; additional private open space will be required throughout the
development per the City's Urban Design Regulations and will be reviewed in detail during
the Site Plan Review process.
It is anticipated that a public park would be developed with the future development of existing
Boeing property located to the west of the project site as a part of what is referred to a
"Phase II" in the Boeing EIS.
e. The plan provides view corridors to the shoreline area and Mt. Rainier where
applicable;
The majority of the new buildings on the project site would be single-story buildings and
would not impede any views to the shoreline or Mt. Rainier.
f_ Public access is provided to water and/or shoreline areas;
Not applicable.
g_ The plan provides distinctive focal points such as public area plazas, prominent
architectural features, or other items.
The above items will be further evaluated at the Site Plan level. A gateway feature is
proposed to be located at the intersection of Logan Avenue Nand N 6th Street and minimum
requirements for pedestrian open space are detailed in the Urban Center Design
Regulations. The gateway feature, open space, and architectural elements will be reviewed
for compliance with the City's Urban Center Design Regulations.
h. Public andlor private streets are arranged in a layout that provides reasonable access
to property and supports the land use envisioned;
The existing streets surrounding the project site (Logan Avenue N, N 8th Street, N 6th Street,
Garden Avenue N, and Park Avenue N) would provide reasonable access to the site. A
future east-west street connecting from Logan Avenue N to Park Avenue N would be
provided upon future redevelopment of the Boeing Remainder when the existing Data Hub is
no longer needed and would help facilitate the compact urban development that is intended
for the site.
i. The plan accommodates and promotes transit, pedestrian, and other alternative
modes of transportation.
As previously indicated, the proposed design appears to provide adequate vehicular and
pedestrian access pOints and routes via the proposed network of driveways and streets to
serve the anticipated level of development. In addition, the applicant indicates that a potential
transit center could be operated on the northeast portion of the project site (Lot 7B). These
items will be further evaluated at the Site Plan level.
j. The plan conforms to the approved conceptual plan required by development
agreement for the subarea in question, if applicable.
The Master Plan is consistent with the Conceptual Plan that was approved November 11,
2005, in that the overall development proposal is within the parameters of development
types, uses, locations and density envisioned in the Conceptual Plan for the site.
k. The plan conforms with the intent and the mandatory elements of the design
guidelines located in RMC 4·3·100. The Master Plan clearly identifies the urban design
concept for each district enunciated in the Urban Center North Comprehensive Plan
policies.
Master Site and Binding Site Plan Rpt 07-048.doc
City of Renton PIBIPW Department
MASTER PLAN FOR SUB-DISTRIC,
REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 12. 2007
& BINDING SITE PLAN FOR LAKESHORE L " .DING 2
Administrative Report
LUA-07-048, SA-M, SSP
Page 11 of17
With the project application. the applicant submitted an Urban Design Consistency Report
which details out how the proposed Master Plan complies with the intent and mandatory
elements of the Urban Center Design Regulations. A modification was requested from the
Design regulations that require a minimum of 150 feet between pedestrian pathways through
parking lots. Sufficient detail was not provided with the current master plan submitted to
justify the approval of such a modification, the proposed modification shall be requested at
the time of Site Plan Review when additional detail of the proposed project is submitted.
As previously discussed above, the proposal complies with the District 1 policies for the
Urban Center North Comprehensive Plan designation.
I. The proposed interconnected circulation network must demonstrate the function and
location of required circulation elements required in RMC 4-3-100. Internal or local
roads shall provide adequate edges and buffers to parking lots_ A sufficient number of
pedestrian-oriented streets are designated to implement the vision for each district in
the Urban Center North Comprehensive Plan designation.
The proposed Master Plan deSignates Logan Avenue N as a High Visibility Street and Park
Avenue N as a Pedestrian Oriented Street, which is consistent with the designations that
were established by The Landing development located to the north of the project site.
Garden Avenue N, N 8th Street, and N 6th Street would be classified as arterials. The
proposed continuation of Park Avenue N as a Pedestrian Oriented Street complies with the
District 1 policies for the Urban Center North Comprehensive Plan designation.
m. Gateways are designated consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and conceptual
plans for the gateway demonstrate the design concept for gateway treatment and
identify significant gateway features to be provided_
A gateway element is proposed at the corner of Logan Avenue Nand N 6th Street. The
specific design of the gateway element is not yet known and will be reviewed in further detail
for compliance with the Urban Design Regulations during the Site Plan Review process.
n. The Master Plan includes a sequencing element that explains what phases of the
Master Plan will be built-out first, and in what order the phases will be built, and an
estimated time frame.
The applicant has requested Master Plan approval for a period of 5 years. The applicant
intends to make the Retail area and the Retail/Residential area available for sale once the
Binding Site Plan has been recorded. It is unlikely that the Boeing Remainder would be sold
for redevelopment prior to 2016. The project has not been divided into phases although
individual buildings may be constructed at different times within portions of the site
depending on development plans of future tenants and/or owners. Construction timing will
receive additional review at the Site Plan level.
o. The plan conforms to RMC 4-3-020: Airport Compatible Land Use Restrictions.
The proposed Master Plan was reviewed by the Airport Manager. The proposed residential
option is anticipated by the airport to be impacted by midfield arrivals (float planes and
helicopters) from the east. The project site is located within Zone 6 of the Airport Influence
Area and is therefore staff recommends that an aviation notice be recorded over the
proposed lots. Such notice may relate to noise, low overhead flights, aviation operations that
create high levels of noise, or aviation operations at night when there is greater sensitivity to
noise. Prior to the approval of uses where aviation overflight may occur, staff recommends
that an avigation easement be granted to the City. The avigation easement language shall be
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to recording.
Rooftops of the proposed development may be attractive to seagulls as roosting areas.
Therefore, staff recommends that the proposed buildings minimize seagull roosting areas of
Master Site and Binding Site Plan Rpt 07-04B.doc
City of Renton PIBIPW Department
MASTER PLAN FOR SUB-DISTRICT _ . BINDING SITE PLAN FOR LAKESHORE LA. ._ING 2
REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 12, 2007
Administrative Report
LUA-07-048, SA-M, BSP
Page 120f17
rooftops through building design measures. These measures would be reviewed in further
detail during the Site Plan review process.
F. Consistency with Binding Site Plan Regulations
Approval of a binding site plan is based upon several factors as established by RMC section 4-7-230
of the Subdivision Regulations contained within Title IV. Development Regulations. The following
binding site plan criteria have been established to assist decision-makers in the review of the
subdivision:
1. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its Elements and Policies
The subject site is deSignated Urban Center North (UCN) on the City's Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Map. The UCN designation is intended to provide large amounts of former
industrial land, which can be redeveloped for new office, residential and commercial uses.
The proposed binding site plan would create lots that would eventually be developed in a
manner consistent with the UCN policies established by the Comprehensive Plan, the
Development Agreement, Conceptual Plan, and Master Plan. See previous discussion under
Section D regarding the proposed Master Pian's consistency with the UCN designation.
Further review of consistency with the UCN designation would occur during the Site Plan
review process.
2. Conformance with Underlying Zoning Designation
The subject site is designated Urban Center-North 1 (UC-N1) on the City of Renton Zoning
Map. Such development must also be consistent with the Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS), Mitigation Document, Addendums issued for the project, the 2003 Development
Agreement entered into by the City of Renton and the Boeing Company, and the Conceptual
Plan.
The proposed subdivision must comply with the applicable development standards of the
UC-N1 zone as discussed previously, unless otherwise approved through the Development
Agreement process. In addition, further review of the pertinent development standards of the
UC-N1 zone (Le., setbacks, building height, landscaping, etc.), as well as compliance with
the parking regulations, would be necessary when site-specific development proposals are
made.
3. Compliance with Binding Site Plan Design Standards
Legal Lots: Lots, parcels, or tracts created through the binding site plan procedure
shall be legal lots of record. The number of lots, tracts, parcels, sites, or divisions
shall not exceed the number of lots allowed in the applicable zoning district.
The UC-N1 zone requires a minimum lot size of 25 acres, except where reduced through the
Site Development Plan Review process. As the applicant submitted for a Master Site Plan
review concurrently with the Binding Site Plan, it appears that the proposal for lots less than
25 acres in area would comply with this requirement. See previous discussion under Section
D. The residential density range that is permitted is a minimum of 20 dulac up to a maximum
of 85 dulac. Density for flats may be increased up to 150 dulac provided that ground-floor
commercial uses are incorporated into the structure. The submitted Master Plan proposes up
to 360 dwelling units over ground floor retail on Lot 5B if the residentiallretail option were
executed. This would result in a proposed net density of 69 dulac (360 dwelling units I 5.24
acres = 69 dulac) which is within the density range permitled The UC-N1 zone does not
require a minimum lot width or depth dimension.
Access: All lots shall provide access to a public street or to a public street by means
of an access easement or other recorded instrument approved by the City. New public
Master Site and Binding Site Plan Rpt 07·04B.doc
City of Renton P/BlPW Department
MASTER PLAN FOR SUB-DISTRICT . BINDING SITE PLAN FOR LAKESHORE L ... _ING 2
REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 12, 2007
Administrative Report
WA-07-048, SA-M, BSP
Page 130f17
roads shall be provided for lot access where determined to be appropriate and
necessary.
Access to all of the proposed lots would be provided via the existing streets that border the
project site (N 8th Street, N 6th Street, Logan Avenue N, Park Avenue N, and Garden Avenue
N). Proposed Lot 5E is the only lot that would not have direct frontage on a public right-of-
way. Access to Lot 5E would be provided over proposed Lots 5C and 5D, which Boeing
would retain ownership of and therefore an access easement is not necessary at this time.
However if Boeing sells off Lots 5C and 5D, an access easement to lot 5E would be required.
Dedication Statement: Where lands are required or proposed for dedication, the
applicant shall provide a dedication statement and acknowledgement on the binding
site plan.
There are no lands proposed for dedication as a part of this Binding Site Plan.
Adequate Provision of Utilities: Each parcel created by the binding site plan shall have
access to water supply, sanitary sewer, and utilities by means of direct access, access
easement, or supporting document approved by the City.
The proposal would have sufficient access and utilities to serve the proposed development.
As the exact location of the necessary easements are likely to change as site-specific
development is designed, utility access will be determined by at the time future development
is proposed on the individual lots.
Required Improvements: Required improvements shall be provided for, either by
actual construction or a construction schedule approved by the City and bonded by
the applicant. The Administrator may also authorize the phasing of installation of
improvements provided any delay in satisfying requirements will not adversely impact
public health, safety, or welfare.
The required street and utility improvements would occur as necessary with site-specific
development proposals, as allowed by the 2003 Development Agreement.
Shared Conditions: The Administrator may authorize sharing of open space, parking,
access and other improvements among contiguous properties subject to the binding
site plan. Conditions of use, maintenance and restrictions on redevelopment of
shared open space, parking, access and other improvements shall be identified on the
binding site plan and enforced by covenants, easements or other similar mechanisms.
The lots created by the binding site plan would be subject to private Covenants, Conditions
and Restrictions to be established by the property owner. At the time of individual lot
development, if shared parking, access or maintenance of common improvements is
necessary between separate properties, staff will require the applicant to demonstrate that
the appropriate legal mechanisms have been established.
4. Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries
Topography The topography of the site is relatively flat. Additional analysis of future
development of the site will be necessary in order to reduce or minimize potential adverse
impacts to surrounding areas.
Relationship to Existing Uses: The surrounding area includes both developed and
undeveloped property zoned UC-N1 and IH as well as The Landing development currently
under construction to the north of the project site. The proposed lots are compatible with
other existing lots in this area, are consistent with the intent of both the Comprehensive Plan
Master Site and Binding Site Plan Rpt 07·048.doc
City of Renton PIBIPW Department
MASTER PLAN FOR SUB-DISTRIC,
REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 12, 2007
& BINDING SITE PLAN FOR LAKESHORE L. ... -.lING 2
Administrative Report
LUA-07-048, SA-M, BSP
Page 14 of 17
and Zoning Code, and would not be out of character with existing or recent development in
the area of the City, Future development of the site would be reviewed for compatibility with
the submitted Master Plan as well as surrounding properties and uses,
5. Availability and Impact on Public Services
Transportation: Future development of the site is anticipated to generate additional traffic
on the City's street system. In order to mitigate transportation impacts, a Transportation
Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per new average daily trip attributed to site-specific
development will be required at the time such projects are proposed,
Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to
furnish services to the proposed development, subject to Code required improvements and
fees at the time of site-specific development. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $0,52 per
square foot of new building area or $388.00 per new multi-family unit, would be required with
the approval of future development proposals in order to mitigate potential impacts to
emergency services,
Recreation: Based on anticipated future development of a multi-family residential
component, the applicant's payment of a Parks Mitigation Fee of $354.51 would be required
as it is anticipated that new residents would use existing and future City parks and
recreational facilities.
Schools: The site is located within the boundaries of the Renton School District. If future
development proposals include residential uses, further analysis of the District's available
capacity and ability to serve residents of the development would be necessary.
Utilities: Presently, there are no existing utility improvements on the subject site, with the
exception of those serving the existing buildings. As previously discussed, future property
owner(s) will be responsible for installing the necessary utilities as individual lot development
is proposed.
xx Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File.
Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report.
G. Findings
Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following:
1) Request: The applicant has requested Administrative Master Site Plan approval of Sub-
District 1 B and Binding Site Plan Approval for Lakeshore Landing 2 located south of N 8th
Street, north of N 6th Street, east of Logan Avenue N and west of Garden Avenue N in
Renton.
2) Master Site Plan Review: The applicant's Master Site Plan Application complies with the
submittal requirements for information for Master Site Plan review. The applicant's Master
Site Plan and project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 1-9,
4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
designation of Urban Center North (UCN).
Master Site and Binding Site Plan Rpt 07-04B.doc
City of Renton PIBlPW Department
MASTER PLAN FOR SUB-DISTRICT
REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 12. 2007
BINDING SITE PLAN FOR LAKESHORE LA ._ING 2
Administrative Report
LUA-07-048, SA-M, BSP
Page 150/17
5) Zoning: The subject proposal complies with the zoning requirements and development
standards of the Urban Center -North 1 (UC-N1) Zoning designation including setbacks
modified through Master Site Plan review.
6) Site Plan Criteria: The proposal mitigates impacts to the site and surrounding uses in
conformance with RMC 4-31-33(D) and the Boeing Renton Comprehensive Plan
Amendment EIS dated October 2003.
7) Setbacks: A modification to the maximum 5-foot setback requirements has been requested
for the residential over retail option on proposed Lot 5B. The requested modification appears
to comply with the modification criteria outlined in RMC 4-9-250D.
8) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North The Landing
Development (currently under construction), West: Boeing aircraft manufacturing and
ancillary operations; East: Paccar; South: Single-family residential.
9) Planned Action Ordinance and Development Agreement: The subject proposal complies
with the Development Agreement dated December 1, 2003, the Conceptual Plan dated
November 14, 2005, and the Planned Action Ordinance dated December 11, 2006.
H. Conclusions
1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton.
2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Urban Center North
(UCN, and the Zoning designation of Urban Center -North 1 (UC-N1).
3) The proposal complies with the site plan evaluation criteria and the binding site plan criteria
as analyzed in Sections D through F of this report.
4) The requested modification to the maximum 5-foot front yard setback requirement complies
with the modification criteria and is approved.
5) The subject proposal complies with the Development Agreement dated December 1, 2003,
the Conceptual Plan dated November 14, 2005, and the Planned Action Ordinance dated
December 11, 2006.
I. Decision
The Master Site Plan for Sub-District 1 B and the Binding Site Plan for Lakeshore Landing 2,
File No. LUA-07-048, is approved subject to the following conditions:
1. A pedestrian connection shall be provided from the proposed development across N 8th
Street and shall connect with the pedestrian connection being constructed as part of the
Landing Development to the north. A plan showing the pedestrian connection shall be
provided at the time of Site Plan Review application for review and approval.
2. An aviation notice shall be recorded over the proposed lots. Such notice may relate to noise,
low overhead flights, aviation operations that create high levels of noise, or aviation
operations at night when there is greater sensitivity to noise.
Master Site and Binding Site Plan Rpt 07~048.doc
City of Renton P/B/PW Department
MASTER PLAN FOR SUB-DISTRIC
REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 12, 2007
& BINDING SITE PLAN FOR LAKESHORE L. ... DING 2
Administrative Report
LUA-07-048, SA-M, asp
Page 160f17
3. An avigation easement shall be granted to the City as aviation overflight may occur over the
project site. The avigation easement language shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Attorney prior to recording.
4. The proposed buildings shall be designed to minimize seagull roosting areas on rooftops.
Building design measures to discourage seagull roosting shall be submitted for review and
approval with the Site Plan application.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION:
SIGNATURES:
Neil Watts, Development Services Director
TRANSMITTED this 12'" day of September, 2007 to the owner/applicant/contact:
Jeffrey Adelson
The Boeing Company
M/C 6R6-1 0 Triton Tower
700 S Renton Village Place
Renton, WA 98057
TRANSMITTED this 1;t" day of September, 2007 to the Parties of Record:
Gary Riffle
16846 188th Avenue SE
Renton, WA 98058
Dan Allem
19233 14th Avenue NE
Shoreline, WA 98155
Nora Schultz
536 Williams Avenue N
Renton, WA 98057
Melinda Webb
541 Wells Avenue N
Renton, WA 98057
TRANSMITTED this 12'" day of September, 2007 to the following:
Larry Meckling, Building Official
Mark Petersen, Fire Marshall
Neil Watts, Development Services Director
Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Renton Reporter
date
Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of the land use decision must be filed in writing on or
before 5:00 PM on September 26, 2007 (14 days from the date appeal period ends).
If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the
required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055.
Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information
regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510.
Master Site and Binding Site Plan Rpt 07-04B.doc
City of Renton PIBIPW Department
MASTER PLAN FOR SUB-DISTRICT. & BINDING SITE PLAN FOR LAKESHORE L "._'ING 2
REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 12, 2007
Advisory Notes to Applicant:
Administrative Report
LUA-07-048, SA-M, BSP
Page 17 of 17
The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental
determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal
process for environmental determinations.
Planning
1. The site is located within Urban Center -North (UC-N) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Urban Center
North 1 (UC-N1) zoning designation.
2. Additional Site Plan and Environmental (SEPA) Review will be necessary for site-specific proposals for the lots
created by the Binding Site Plan.
3. Staff recommends future development proposals on individual lots undergo the pre-application review process in
order to adequately address site-specific issues.
Fire Prevention
1. A fire mitigation fee based on $0.52 per square foot of new building area or $388.00 per new multi-family unit will
be required at the time of individual lot development.
2. Fire Department access roadways are required to be within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior.
Roadways must be a minimum width of 20 feet with an inside turning radius of 25 feet and 45 feet on the outside.
3. Dead-end roadways exceeding 150 feet in length must provide an emergency turnaround as required by code.
Plan Review
1. The applicant will be required to construct all water, sewer, storm, erosion control and street improvements to City
standards prior to the issuance of building permits for individual lot development.
2. Storm drainage report and design is required to comply with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual
requirements for detention and water quality.
3. All fire flow requirements must be met with future development proposals.
Property Services -Comments for Final Binding Site Plan Submittal
1. See attached
Note: Exhibits 6 through 9 of the Administrative Determination and Land Decision for the Sub-District 1B
Master Plan and Lakeshore Landing2 Binding Site Plan are available for review at the City of Renton
Development Services Division, 6th floor of City Hall, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, WA.
Master Site and Binding Site Plan Rpt 07-04B.doc
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
May 30,2007
Jill Ding
Sonja J. Fesser ~
Boeing Lakeshore Landing 2 Binding Site Plan, LUA-07-048-BSP
Format and Legal Description Review
Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced binding site plan submittal and have the
following comments:
Comments for the Applicant:
Note the City of Renton land use action numher and land record number, LUA-07-048-BSP
and LND-35-0016, respectively, on all three drawing sheets in the spaces already provided.
NOTE: The type size used for the land record number should be smaller than that used for
the land use action number.
Remove all references to parking stalls and other items not directly impacting the
subdivision.
Remove the reference to zoning (upper left-hand corner of Sheet 2 of 3).
Note whether the properties adjoining 'TRACT R"(on the west side) are platted (note plat
name and lot and block numbers) or unplatted. Note whether the properties east of Garden
Ave N and opposite "LOT 7B" and "LOT 7C" are platted or unplatted.
Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or
calculated, if any.
Note that if there are restrictive covenants, agreements or easements to others (City of
Renton, etc.) as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the binding
site plan. A reference to the associated easements, agreements, etc., plus spaces for the
recording numbers thereof, should be noted on the binding site plan submittal.
\H;\Fite Sys:\LNO • Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-35 -Binding Site Plans\ooi6\RV070530,doc
June 8, 2007
Page 2
Add CITY OF RENTON to the title line for the "ADMINISTRATOR OF PLANNING/
BUILDINGIPUBLIC WORKS"(Sheet 1 of 3).
The "DIVISION OF RECORDS AND ELECTIONS" block is not needed (Sheet 1 of 3).
How is "LOT SE"going to be accessed"
Fee Review Comments:
The Fee Review Sheet for this review of the preliminary binding site plan is provided for
your use and information.
Comments for tbe Project Manager:
Is it necessary to have an approval bock for "King County Finance Division Certification"?
If not, have the applicant remove it from the suhmittal (Sheet 1 of 3).
H:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-35 -Binding Site Plans\OOI6\RV070530.doc\cor
PROPERTYSI ICES FEE REVIEW FOR SUBDIVISION '0. 2007 ---le=5'----
APPLICANT: ~ """"""I~ COMl?,LbL'(" RECEIVED FROM -----;c;=-
t-l8IH Sf I/( I..i • ..,-J-I eT. (date)
JOB ADDRESS: SOU!.l'1")!tt21fY ' oc; 4 U 4."f!"u III cV·,....-eU ~J(~ 20 WO# '171':!>5
NATURE OF WORK: 8.l.a::r. '2'" uCILJ", e;rr£ 1P' b..q(a,.....' WGJ Ak'PS-Ic:Ql)}I 35-00 I <P
X PRELIMINARY REVIEWO'F SUBDIVISIOi'i BY LONG PLAT. NEED MORE INFORMATION: .. LEGAL DESCRIPTION
SHORT PLAT, BINDING SITE PLAN, ETC. PID #'s VICINITY MAP
FINAL REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION, TIllS REVIEW REPLACES SQUARE FOOTAGE OTHER
PRELIMINARY FEE REVIEW DATED FRONT FOOTAGE
SUBJECT PROPERTY PARENT PID# '722300 "01' ~OI15)( NEW KING CO. TAX ACCT.#(s) are required when
082.305~q2gJ ,-qal9' asslgued by King County.
It is the intent of this development fee analysis to ~~~/~er on notice, that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon
development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site arxl
off-site improvements (i.e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances aId
determined by the applicable Utility Section.
Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at rime of Building PermitJConstruction Permit
application.
The existing house on SP Lot # ___ , addressed as has not previously paid
---,..,--:-c--o SDC fees, due to connection to City utilities prior to existance of SDC fee Ord. SP Lot# will be
subject to future SDC fees if triggering mechanisms are touched within current City Ordinances.
We understand that this subdivision is in the preliminary stage and that we will have the opportunity to review it again before recordation.
The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METiiODOF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE
Latecomer Ae;reement (vvt) WATER ~O-
Latecomer Aereement (pvt) W ASTEW ATER -O~
Latecomer Aereernent (pvt) OTHER ~O ~
/
Special Assessment District/W A TER J-O-
/
Special Assessment District/W ASTEW ATER ./ -0-
Joint Use ~eement (METRO}. " Local Improvement District • "
Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP, CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION .
FUTURE OBLIGATIONS I •
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -WATER .. Estimated #OFUNITSI SDCFEE
0 Pd Prevo .. Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) -Never Pd SQ. FTG.
Sinde family residential $1 956/unit x
Mobile home dwelline unit $1, 956/00it in nark 'l L'V
Apartment Condo $1,174/unit not in CD or COR zones x I , "«' ..e...
Commercial/Industrial, $0.273/sq. ft. of property (not less than $1,956.00) x l 0'V' .r}\r .a.'V
Boeing, by SpedaJ Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter (2,800 GPM threshold) .~ . \\¥ .<8J
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -WASTEWATER" Estimated .c;¢~~ .d ~ "P ..... -rp.¢-\'-' -Pd Prevo 0 PartiallyPd (Ltd Exemptlont -Never Pd
Sincle family residential $1,017/unit x .NY' ~. (
Mobile home dwelline unit $1,017/ooit x . , \' \ ......
Apartment, Condo $610/unit not in CD or COR zones x ~r /
Commercial/Industrial $0.142/sq. ft. of nroperty x(not less than $1,017.00) .. ./
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -SURFACEWATER .. Estimated IY .. Pd Prevo .. Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd
Sim!le family residential and mobile home dwelling unit $759/unit x
All other properties $0.265Isq ft of new impervious area of properly x
(not less than $759.00)
I PRELIMINARY TOTAL $
,~~) Cl..l j. .~L. ) _",h"'/07 'di '" • 0
" 0
Signa:, f Rev(:fng Authority DATI /
..,
, .. "'If sub property is within an LID, it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status . 2 ~ < .. e·
Square footage figures are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are subject to change. • • .. Current City SDC fee charges apply to ~
0
EFFECTIVE January 2, 2006
tOJECT LUA-07-048, SA-M, BSI
The Landing 2
City of Renton Department of Planning I Building I Public Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENTAL APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
(Continuation)
POLICE RELATED COMMENTS
372 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Theft from construction sites is one of the most commonly reported crimes in the City. To
protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up
when not in use. The site should have security lighting, and any construction trailer or
storage area should be completely fenced-in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will
provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective criminal and will
demonstrate that the area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked
when not in use, and should be fitted with heavy-duty dead bolts with a minimum 1-1/2" throw
when bolted. Glass windows in construction trailers should be shatter-resistant. Toolboxes
and storage containers should be secured with heavy-duty padlocks and kept locked when
not in use.
"No Trespassing" signs should be posted. These signs allow officers, upon contact, to
provide a verbal warning to trespassers that should they be contacted on the property again,
they could be cited and/or arrested.
This project will involve a large amount of time with different phases of construction going on
at various locations. Theft and burglary at construction sites is prevalent, and I expect due to
the isolated location and overabundance of construction materials, this site will be a target for
such incidents. It's recommended that the developer go the extra step and provide secured
temporary housing for materials that could be easily removed during the course of an evening
or weekend. The same security considerations should be made for any large construction
equipment (tractors, backhoes, excavators, etc.) These vehicles should be lined up along the
fence lines that abut the adjacent streets. Spark plugs and/or batteries should be removed
from these vehicles (especially the lifts!) when not in use (Le., evenings, weekends, and
holiday periods.) The addition of security personnel after hours is recommended.
COMPLETED COMPLEX
All exterior doors should be made of solid metal or metal over wood, with heavy-duty
dead bolt locks, minimum 3" wood screws, lalcll guards, pry-resistant cylinders around the
locks, and peepholes. If glass doors are used, they should be fitted with the hardware
described above and additionally be fitted with a layer of security film. Security film can
increase the strength of the glass by up to 300%, greatly reducing the likelihood of breaking
Security Survey Page 1 of 3 07-048
glass to gain entry. Acce, to the back of the buildings shou
security fencing, as these as could be vulnerable to criml.
surveillance by business customers or tenants.
e limited, preferably with
Ie to the lack of natural
It is recommended that the commercial areas have monitored alarm systems. It's not
uncommon for businesses to experience theft and/or vandalism during the hours of darkness.
Considering the amount of loitering that will incur at this location, additional security cameras
are recommended for courtyards, parking lots, etc. An auxiliary security service should be
used to patrol the property, as well. It is important to direct foot traffic into the main entrances
of the buildings. Any alternative employee entrances should have coded access to prevent
trespassing.
If there are going to be payphones at The Landing, it is recommended they be outgoing use
only. Public payphones can attract drug traffic and having the ability to call out only severely
hinders this type of activity.
All areas of this project need to have adequate lighting. This will assist in deterring theft from
motor vehicle (one of the most common crimes in Renton), as well as provide safe pedestrian
travel for customers utilizing the businesses.
Structures should have building numbers clearly posted with numbers in a color contrasting
with the building. This will assist emergency personnel in locating the correct location for
response.
Landscaping should be installed with the objective of allowing visibility -not too dense and
not too high. Too much landscaping will make customers and employees feel isolated and
can sometimes provide criminals with concealment to commit crimes such as burglary and
malicious mischief (property destruction).
It is key for a complex of this size to have appropriate lighting and signage. "No Trespassing"
signs should be posted in conspicuous locations throughout the property, including entrances
to the property and parking areas.
Parking Lot/Parking Garages
Lighting is the number one deterrent to crime. Theft from motor vehicle is the most common
occurring crime in our City, and I would expect the parking areas within this project will be
susceptible. Appropriate lighting in and around the parking areas is imperative. Although the
responsibility for property protection belongs to the driver of the vehicle, if individuals don't
feel safe and secure within this pavilion, they will not frequent it. Signage should also be
posted within the parking garage advising customers of The Landing to not leave valuables
within sight and to secure their vehicles.
It's recommended that surveillance equipment be installed in all parking locations, and
signage stating such, be posted in conspicuous locations through all parking areas.
I recommend the placement of emergency call-posts within all parking areas (both lots and
garages). For the safety and conven ience of those using these parking facilities, it's
Security Survey Page 2 of 3 07-048
recommended that the el6 ors be placed in the middle of e 1 garage level, to include
surveillance cameras in and lund the elevator lobby.
Thoroughfares
Pedestrian walkways should be well-lit and not closed off by any solid fencing or walls.
Walkways should be open and exposed to other pedestrians, vehicles, and adjacent
businesses.
Miscellaneous
If there are to be payphones installed, they should be stand-alone structures, away from
neighboring business, and should only accept outgoing calls to deter drug activity.
Public restrooms, independent from the individual businesses, should be monitored on a
regular basis by security or maintenance personnel, and should be secured at closing.
The "retail street" should be lined with cement bollards to assist in preventing vehicles from
crossing into the path of pedestrians. These bollards can also deter criminals from
committing a "smash and grab" by utilizing vehicles to break into businesses.
Park-like settings, such as the one built in and around The Landing, tend to attract
skateboarding enthusiasts. It's recommend that all seat walls, retaining walls, and elongated
planters have "bumpers" installed to deter these individuals from using them as "riding rails".
Light standards should be protected from vandalism by installing "cages" or guards around
light fixtures.
I highly recommend that the developer have a Renton Police Crime Prevention
Representative conduct a personalized security survey for each individual structure once they
are complete.
Security Survey Page 3 of 3 07-048
MAY -! 2007
10-90
LOT 5A LOT 78
PAAKING PARKING
GARAGf GARAGE
10_71 LOT 7C d"~ LOT 5C ~"
LOT 50
LOT 58 ~ 10-72
i I
-~-
I
SCALE
'00 0 'f 'IT r .. ....!
(Fm )
, INCH .. 200 fT
MAlt« BY;· CPC
LAStrnlT! .....
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ . ~ . . . -~ . --
SUB-DISTRICT 1B MASTER SITE APPLICATION
Project /1208211.01
July 8th, 2007
IIlillllli!
f';;:~~
t'i1
.CAlLISON
Aerial Context Map
-------------_ ................. .
RETALAREA -LOT Yo
AHCHOR··-----~----"i2'e.n:
JUNIORANCHORS 01(1.2'10;
RETAIl.. BHOPS 211.7k
TOTAt.SOFT 1983k
TOTAL Al.Al(INQ "''' RATIO (78e pe 1196.311;) ".011,000
Im& 6B16 -I.O.I II
Jt..R\IIORAHCHCIRS-"" RETAIlsttOPS ,1<,
TOTALSQFT "2k
TOTAL """"'"' "'po
RATIO {28L!5 PI I ee.2 k) 4.Q,11,000
R2TAI...JIII!8IDem AREA.-LOT 58
MINI ANCHORS 12k
ReTAIL SHOf'S 57.Q k
TOTALSQFT 69.9 k
TOTAL !'ARKING 2l8pe
RATIO (2711 ps 169.9 k; 4.()/1,OnO
§Q~IMg B;;MAI!'n!~E!l
ElUILDI~G HHO 207.4 ,.
BUILDING 'O·la 210.6 K
TOTAl"'" 418k
PARKING (SURFACE) 822"
PAAKINO (S1'RVCTURE) 1,985pa.
TOTAl. ........ "'" po RATIO (2e01 pe 1418 k) 8.2/1,000
O\/!RAU.IQFT ......
0VEIW.1. ........ a,as,.
SUB-DISTRICT 1B MASTER SITE APPLICATION
Prcject.206211h'1
July 8th, 2007
VIEW
VIEW
-_.j
;::.,~~Wi L-~-:> ~,. " . __ " _, r
if /V--~~ ;'~--D'-'--' ....•....... ~ .' ~ !j~ D,[J
, .... ; c':/·L?:·', i I:
,....... ND, ... .wu . ';
I .' '-' 'il ,~[pwj\i
-';:.;Jiii-T '-, ~~;;~:::it,:~¥t:~.
. i, ~ ~ ~.
~. -,
,";,"
NOTA_'
~
C .... LLISON ,-
" i
c
Z1 NEW RETAIL ANCHORS
NEW RETAIL SHOPS
NEW RESIDENTIAL
5 NEW STRUCTURED PARKING
~ NEW PAVING AND LANDSCAPING
• EXISTING OFFICE BUILDINGS
.,,: EXISTING PARKING/SUPPORT BUiLDINGS
EXISTING PAVING
O' 50' 100 200 400"
N
l' !~--)
Site Plan -Retail Option
-----_ .................................. __ ... .
. '-"'.,'\r,·
RETAI.. AREA -LOT IiA
~----~--12lr·Hi
JUNIOR N<lCHORS 4IJ.2K
RETAIL SHOPS 29.1 ~
lUfAlSOFT 198,3k
TOTAL PARKIIIG "". RATIO (786 pal 196.3 k) 4.011,000
BIil6L ABE! -r.m: II
.... ORANCHORS 38.6k
RElJ\JL SHOPS 27.6 k
TOTAlSOFT "" ,
TOTAL_ 2'", RATlO (265~f88.2k) 4.Di1,OOO
R;ETM.JREaIDEtmAL AREA· LOT sa
FIVE ft:OORS RESIDEN'fiA( 3BO unb
RETAIL 18 k
SURFACE PARKfNG 91 pe
STRUCTURED PARKING "''' TOTAL PARKING 717 ps
BOEING REMAINDER
BUIlDING 10:20 207.4_k
BUILDING 1M3 ~1O_6 ~
TOTAlSQFT 418 k
~ jSlW'.6.CE1 "''' PAAtQNO (STRUCTURE) ".".
TOTAL_ ""''' RATIO(2807 PlS1418!o:.) 8.211.000
VIEW
ENlARGED VIEW
SUB-DISTRICT 1 B MASTER SITE APPLICATION
Prqact. 206211.01
Juty BIh, 2007
~ .o .... -~ ... / .. ,~ .... ' .. Y'~. _. WiJ .. L ....... ~ ... . . ' )CZ))J)\{6-c5' ':6 o 01,10
CALLISON
D "
!PI. qrl j": ell. I·
I . -1--, ,
"'"'''''''-,...,.-~" ·ib'·-~·:l·-~,i-· _r-'
tt if II
-'\"---,,,--, ! ',( ,.
,.r1··~.1'" ~':4:' ,"1.:.1'" ,~ .. ~ .'-l'~t
'. .1 :', ;;~. \ ,-" ,~ 'r'"'I' ,.;i,¢.""'~' ildtClt~~1
~ ..
M~
{i!, NEW RETAIL ANCHORS
NEW RETAIL SHOPS
NEW RESIDENTIAL
:~ NEW STRUCTURED PARKING
NEW PAVING AND LANDSCAPING
II EX!STING OFFICE BUILDINGS
EXISTING PARKING/SUPPORT BUILDINGS
EXISTING PAVING
N
1
0' so' 100 200 400
Stte Plan -Residential Option
DECISION DATE: August 15, 2007
Project Name: Master Plan for Subdistrict 1 B and Binding Site Plan for Boeing Lakeshore
Landing 2
Applicant/Owner/ Jeffrey Adelson
Contact: Boeing Realty Corp.
M/C 6R6-10, Triton Tower
700 S Renton Village Place
Renton, WA 98055
File Number: LUA07-048, SA-M, BSP
Project Manager: Jill K. Ding, Senior Planner
Project Background/Description: The applicant, The Boeing Co., is requesting Administrative
Master Site Plan and Binding Site Plan approval for the development of an approximately 42-acre site
zoned Urban Center North - 1 (UCN-1) located south of N 8 th Street, north of N 6th Street, and
between Logan Avenue N and Garden Avenue N. The proposal would result in the creation of 8
additional lots on the project site. The Master Site Plan is comprised of three parts. The Retail Area
(lots 5A and 7B of the Binding Site Plan) totals approximately 19.33 acres and is located on the
northern portion of the property along 8th Avenue, is available for near-term redevelopment. Proposed
Lot 7B of the Retail Area may also be available for development of a transit facility. The
Residential/Retail Area (lot 5B of the Binding Site Plan) totals approximately 5.19 acres and is
proposed for near-term redevelopment of a small retail village or a residential over retail development.
The Boeing Remainder makes up the southern portion of Sub-District 1B. It contains 418,000 square
feet of existing office and laboratory space and approximately 3.86 acres of land with future
redevelopment potential which is unlikely to occur before 2016.
If the Retail Area and Residential/Retail Area were redeveloped with only retail the project would
result in the construction of approximately 332,400 square feet of retail space. If they were developed
with a combination of multi family residential and retail the project would result in the construction of
280,500 square feet of retail and 461,500 square feet of residential. Site improvements would include
landscaping, utilities, roads, stormwater facilities, and special design standards for the UC-N1 zone.
The Master Site Plan area encompasses the majority, but not all of sub-district 1 B, as it does not
include the portion of Sub-District 1 B that lies south of N 6th Street between Park Avenue Nand
Garden Avenue N. The Retail Area consists of approximately 20.17 acres, the Retail/Residential Area
consists of approximately 5.19 acres, and the Boeing Remainder is approximately 16.6 acres.
A Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the proposed redevelopment uses and density
range was completed in October 2003. The site was analyzed in the EIS as Sub-District 1 B. The
project site and potential redevelopment were addressed in a Planned Action Ordinance dated
December 11, 2006 (Ordinance No. 5242). This determination addresses the Master Plan's
consistence with the Planned Action Ordinance, and its designation as a Planned Action. Detailed
site plans will be required for the commercial and/or residential components of the overall
development.
Project Location: South of N 8th St, north of N 6th St, between LOQan Ave N and Garden Ave N
Site Area: Approximately 42 acres
Exhibits
1. Yellow File, Master Plan for Sub-District 1 B and Binding Site Plan for Boeing Lakeshore
Landing2 (LUA07-048, SA-M, BSP)
2. Aerial Context Map, dated July 6th , 2007.
3. Site Plan -Retail Option, dated July 6th , 2007.
4. Site Plan -Residential Option, dated July 6 th , 2007.
5. Neighborhood Map, dated December 12'h, 2006.
6. Boeing Renton Sub-District 1 B Environmental Consistency Analysis, prepared by Blumen
Consulting Group, Inc., dated May 2006.
7. Renton/Boeing Urban Center-North Development Agreement, dated December 1, 2003.
Planned Action Review Criteria
Per Section III.E. of the Planned Action Ordinance, the Director of Development Services, or the
Director's designee, is authorized to designate a project application as a Planned Action pursuant to
RCW 43.21C.031(2)(a), if the project application meets WAC 197-11-172 and all of the following
conditions:
a) The project is located on the subject site as described in Section
III.A., or is an off-site improvement directly related to a proposed
development on the subject site; and,
The development proposal in the Master Plan for Sub-District 1 Band
Binding Site Plan for Boeing Lakeshore Landing 2 is located on the site
described in Section III.A of the Planned Action Ordinance (5242). The
site is commonly referred to as Sub-District 1 B of the site analyzed by
the FEIS documents for the Boeing redevelopment proposal.
b) The project is consistent with the Renton Comprehensive Plan
adopted under RCW 36. 70A; and,
The proposal is consistent with the Urban Center -North (UC-N)
Comprehensive Plan designation and policies.
c) The project's significant environmental impacts have been
adequately addressed in the EIS by reviewing the environmental
checklist or other project review form as specified in WAC 190-11-
315; and,
The Master Plan application for Sub-District 1 B is consistent with the
development ranges analyzed for the plan alternatives under the FEIS
documents for the Sub-District 1 B Planned Action. Therefore, the
significant environmental impacts associated with the Sub-District 1 B
Master Plan and Binding Site Plan for Boeing Lakeshore Landing 2
have been adequately addressed in the FEIS.
d) The project complies with the Planned Action Thresholds in the
EIS; and,
The Sub-District 1 B Master Plan and Binding Site Plan for Boeing
Lakeshore Landing 2 complies with the Planned Action thresholds listed
in the FEIS. Exhibit 6 provides an analysis of the proposed projects'
consistency with the FEIS/Planned Action Thresholds.
e) The Director has determined that the project's significant impacts
have been mitigated through the application of the Development
Agreement, as well as other City requirements, standard mitigation
Decision
fees and conditions, which together constitute sufficient mitigation
for the significant environmental impacts associated with the
proposed project; and,
The Sub-District 1 B Master Plan and Binding Site Plan for Boeing
Lakeshore Landing 2 are consistent with the Development Agreement,
Planned Action Thresholds, and the FEIS. Therefore, standard
mitigation fees and conditions, as well as other City requirements and
conditions constitute sufficient mitigation for the environmental impacts
associated with the proposed project.
f) The proposed project complies with all applicable local, state and
federal regulations, and where appropriate, needed variances or
modification or other special permits have been requested; and,
The application for the Sub-District 1 B Master Plan and Binding Site
Plan for Boeing Lakeshore Landing 2 complies with all applicable local,
state, and federal regulations. In addition, the applicant has requested
antiCipated modifications to the minimum lot size, requirement for large
format retail structures to connect to additional structures, 150-foot
separation between pedestrian pathways through the surface parking
lots, and the maximum 5-foot setback from a front and side yard along a
street property line. No variances or other special permits are
antiCipated to be required.
g) The proposed project is not an essential public facility.
The proposed project is not an essential public facility.
The Master Plan for Sub-District 1B and Binding Site Plan for Boeing Lakeshore Landing 2 is
designated as a Planned Action pursuant to RCW 43.21C.031(2)(a).
EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION:
SIGNATURES:
Neil Watts, Director date
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
..
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
SUMMARY:
·'''i'OTAr:.>saFT
TtitA1-i¥.RraNa
R.it.OO{7asjJet..1I18.31C1
~AREA~~tOT,7B
TOTALSQFT
TOTALF'J'\RKING
RATIO (218pel69.9k)
BOEING,REMAINDER
BUILOING1()...20
BUlLOING1f1-18
•. ~.
-t~~f;lIthl: __ '·C .'. ",-. "
:~~.
-fil8,;:'It'
~""
BUk:
278,.
4.0/1,000
207.·"C
210.6 k
',"irk '.: ::r4J8!JI
I :~,m\iii:· , ",
SI!JB"(;)IS,TRICT tB MASTER'SITEAPfilltCA'tl0N
,.,;;qed#:2oe2l1:01
Ju!ytllhi2OOT
VIEW
~
• CALLISON
• NEW RETAIL ANCHORS
• NEW RETAIL SHOPS • • '!! • • •
NEW RESIDENTIAL
NEW STRUCTURED PARKING
NEW PAVING AND LANDSCAPING
EXISTING OFFICE BUILDINGS
EXISTING PARKING/SUPPORT BUILDINGS
EXISTING PAVING
N
~ ,fT\
0' 50' 100' 200' 400" ~
Site Plan ·Reta" .option II
...•••••••.................. ----
SUMMARY:
TO'TAl'sCF.l'.
'·'~PAroaNG_ . RAT!O'{785~11ge::nl)
1'OTA1::SQFr··
SURFACE PARKING
SlRUCTUREO PARKING
TOTAL PARKING
BOEING REMAINDER
BUILDING 10.20
BUILDING 10-18
TOTJW~Fr
~-~~..,
:nl:f).i.~ i*1iO~~f~f8~
..n
~iM
88.2_k ..... • o;r ....
81,.
"" 117 p:!I
207Ak
210.8k
411J.k ....... , "wpe
,-~~, -.
SUB;DISJRICT 1B'MASTER SFTE APPLICATION
-~1I2OS'Z'11.01
~8Ittj:2007
• CALLISON
• NEW RETAil ANCHORS • • • f' • • II
NEW RETAil SHOPS
NEW RESIDENTIAL
NEW STRUCTURED PARKING
NEW PAVING AND LANDSCAPING
EXISTING OFFICE BUILDINGS
EXISTING PARKINGfSUPPORT BUILDINGS
EXISTING PAVING
N
,...__ ! rT\
O' SO' 100' 200' 0100' \.J
Site Plan -Resldentlal'Optlon II
.
DEVEI..OPMI'NT PLANNING
CITY OF RENTON
MAY - 7 2007
-·,,~n
~ \
, .... . _ ... ,-, .. "e,ti_
LOT 2A 'g
LOT fA D-o,
'i
z --N 10th Sf
~
I
r:f!'~"" " s;t~ ~ .r#G '" t
LOT 4A
f' ~
LOT JA rJ'r?
) ~c-8'
-(S £.\,.:
lJ f~
N 8th SV' \
10-90 ~
.;
10-80
~ LOT 5A LOT 78
~ ~ lSi
LOT 7A
PARKiN, a P"",",'
GARAGE GJRAGE
10-71 LOT 7C ~
LOT 5C ~.cJ-
I, LOT 50 "-I~ LOTf:~2L EJ Ij ...
,-IV ' Sf
" I~ I~ i;q" ~ ~ I" '" ~ 0
11
0 Ii Ii I~ -e-'" r:f!'~"" 0
"
rfiG Il I • SCALE
'00 ! 'f 'f l' 5 St ...
! (FEET)
j INCH .. '200 FT
;== OO>CN£O,, ___ jJ ~ -~-I_---~ . . . MA'" BY, --=-APPRO>£!) B. i . I..AKESHORE /.ANDfNG2 fllHDlNGSITE PLAN IIDfU/J, ~ -11m'
-a.-~ f..AStEDlT; PLOT DATE; , _ NE/GHBORHOOOMAP 1= .
RDiTON KING WASHING10N ;.;::;
SCALE: 1PRQJ£CT NO. lDRAWlNG FILE NAME: . .,...-.'--.-..-..;,-
L-,. '" 200' """ D326''''SWv-EIc07
Jennifer 1. Schorr
mONE (206) 359-<;116
>AX (206) 359-7116
EMAIL"JSchorr@perkinscoie.com
August 1, 2007
Ms. Jill Ding
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Perkins I
Coie
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4800
Seattle, WA 98101-3099
PHONE; 206.359.8000
FAX: 206.359.9000
www.perkinscoie.com
SUbject: Master Plan for Sub-District 18 and Binding Site Plan for Boeing Lakeshore
Landing 2 -Revised Materials
Dear Jill:
Enclosed please find The Boeing Company's revised materials for a Master Plan for Sub-District
18 and a Binding Site Plan for Boeing Lakeshore Landing 2. The Master Plan materials have
been revised in response to the City's comments. The Binding Site Plan has been updated to
reflect current site conditions.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
cc: Jeffrey Adelson
03003-0166fLEGAL 1343951 0.1
ANCHORAGE· BEIJING BELLEVUE· r;OI~F (rllrA.GO· DENVER LOS ANGELES· MENLO PARK
OLYMPIA· PHOENIX· PORTLAND· SAN rF2:\N(I',CO· SEATTLE· SHANGHAI· WASHINGTON, D.C.
Perkins Coif' III' ;:md Affiliates
~ Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
March 19, 2007
Jill Ding, Senior Planner, Development Services Division
City of Renton
Michael J. Read, P.E.
Transportation Engineering t-iorthwest, LLC
Transportation Consistency Analysis -Clarification to March 2007 Submittal
In May 2006, the original consistency analysis completed by TENW for Sub-District 1 B
assumed a buildout of approximately 535 residential under a conservative worst-case trip
generation scenario. We applied a highly conservative ratio of building square footage per
unit (800 sf/residential unit in the original analysis), because from a trip generation
perspective the number of units drives trip generation for residential uses, and not the size
of individual residential units. Under this mixed use buildout scenario, total buildout was
assumed at 1.478 million additional square-feet in 2015 (of which residential uses comprised
approximately 428,000 square-feet) in the May 2006 analysis.
In the Master Plan submittals being presented to the City in March 2007, Boeing has
identified a higher square-footage for residential uses (461,500 square-feet, or a net increase
of approximately 33,500 square-feet). However, the total number of residential units has
significandy decreased -from 535 to 360. This reduction in number of units has been made
as the residential concepts have been refined and the ratio of building area/residential unit
has increased to an average of approximately 1,280 sf/residential unit. As a result, the net
reduction in total number of units, the number on which vehicle trip generation is
dependent, has been reduced by 175 residential units. Therefore, the original May 2006
analysis is considered highly conservative and the change in square footage proposed by the
2007 Master Plan does not alter the conclusions in that analysis.
www.tenw.com
PO Box 65254 • Seattle, WA 98155
OfficelFax (206) 361·7333 • Toll Free (888) 220-7333
Jennifer L. Schorr
,"ONK (206) 359-6116
eAX (206) 359-7116
EMAIL.JSchorr@perkinscoie.com
August 1, 2007
VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
Ms. Jill Ding
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, W A 98055
Perkins I
Coie
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4800
Seattle, WA 98101"3099
PHONE: 206.359.8000
FAX: 206.359.9000
www.perkinscoie.com
Subject: Master Plan for Sub-District IB and Binding Site Plan for Boeing Lakeshore
Landing 2 -Revised Materials
Dear Jill:
Enclosed please find The Boeing Company's revised PMTs for their Master Plan for Sub-
District nIB.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
~-f'--tA..f/ ~
~~ifer L. Schorr
JLS:cjm
Enclosure
03003-0 166/LEGAL 13444739.1
ANCHORAGE· BEIJING BELLEVUE· BOIS[ CI·I(,~GO· DENVER LOS ANGELES' MENLO PARK
OLYMPIA PHOENIX· PORTLAND· SAN IR,~r\CISCO· SEATTLE· SHANGHAI· WASHINGTON, D.C.
Perk-ric, COIl.' i IP and Affiliates
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
PLANNING/BUILDING/
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
July 31, 2007
LUA07-048
Jill K. Ding, Senior Planner ::/J-
Sub-District IB Master Plan and Lakeshore Landing 2
Binding Site Plan
A meeting was held with Boeing on June 18 th during which revisions were requested to
the submitted application materials. The following revisions were requested:
1. Define a hierarchy of streets (High Visibility (Logan), Arterial, Pedestrian
Oriented (Park);
2. Provide a mid block street (public or private), this street does not have to be
constructed right away as the existing Data Hub is located in the vicinity;
3. Provide a designated pedestrian connection to the Landing to the north and
additional pathways through the development;
4. Add another option showing the possibility for a transit center on the northeast
portion of the site;
5. Show the most updated Landing site plan abutting the project to the north; and
6. Identify a gateway feature at the comer of 6 th and Logan.
During the meeting with Boeing it was agreed that revisions would be made and that they
would be submitting these revisions to the City. Therefore, as of June 18 th review of the
project was placed on hold until the requested revisions are submitted.
q :\data ~ center\templates\pbpw\standardmemo.doc
PROJECT LUA-07-048, SA-M, BSP
The Landing 2
City of Renton Department of Planning I Building I Public Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENTAL APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
(Continl.lation)
POLICE RELATED COMMENTS
372 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Theft from construction sites is one of the most commonly reported crimes in the City. To
protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up
when not in use. The site should have security lighting, and any construction trailer or
storage area should be completely fenced-in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will
provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective criminal and will
demonstrate that the area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked
when not in use, and should be fitted with heavy-duty dead bolts with a minimum 1-1/2" throw
when bolted. Glass windows in construction trailers should be shatter-resistant. Toolboxes
and storage containers should be secured with heavy-duty padlocks and kept locked when
not in use.
"No Trespassing" signs should be posted. These signs allow officers, upon contact, to
provide a verbal warning to trespassers that should they be contacted on the property again,
they could be cited and/or arrested.
This project will involve a large amount of time with different phases of construction going on
at various locations. Theft and burglary at construction sites is prevalent, and I expect due to
the isolated location and overabundance of construction materials, this site will be a target for
such incidents. It's recommended that the developer go the extra step and provide secured
temporary housing for materials that could be easily removed during the course of an evening
or weekend. The same security considerations should be made for any large construction
equipment (tractors, backhoes, excavators, etc.) These vehicles should be lined up along the
fence lines that abut the adjacent streets. Spark plugs and/or batteries should be removed
from these vehicles (especially the lifts!) when not in use (i.e., evenings, weekends, and
holiday periods.) The addition of security personnel after hours is recommended.
COMPLETED COMPLEX
All exterior doors should be made of solid metal or metal over wood, with heavy-duty
dead bolt locks, minimum 3" wood screws, latcf] guards, pry-resistant cylinders around the
locks, and peepholes. If glass doors are used, they should be fitted with the hardware
described above and additionally be fitted with a layer of security film. Security film can
increase the strength of the glass by up to 300%, greatly reducing the likelihood of breaking
Security Survey Page 1 of 3 07-048
glass to gain entry. Acce 0 the back of the buildings ShOl
security fencing, as these areas could be vulnerable to crime
surveillance by business customers or tenants.
)e limited, preferably with
due to the lack of natural
It is recommended that the commercial areas have monitored alarm systems. It's not
uncommon for businesses to experience theft and/or vandalism during the hours of darkness.
Considering the amount of loitering that will incur at this location, additional security cameras
are recommended for courtyards, parking lots, etc. An auxiliary security service should be
used to patrol the property, as well. It is important to direct foot traffic into the main entrances
of the buildings. Any altemative employee entrances should have coded access to prevent
trespassing.
If there are going to be payphones at The Landing, it is recommended they be outgoing use
only. Public payphones can attract drug traffic and having the ability to call out only severely
hinders this type of activity.
All areas of this project need to have adequate lighting. This will assist in deterring theft from
motor vehicle (one of the most common crimes in Renton), as well as provide safe pedestrian
travel for customers utilizing the businesses.
Structures should have building numbers clearly posted with numbers in a color contrasting
with the building. This will assist emergency rersonnel in locating the correct location for
response.
Landscaping should be installed with the objective of allowing visibility -not too dense and
not too high. Too much landscaping will make customers and employees feel isolated and
can sometimes provide criminals with concealment to commit crimes such as burglary and
malicious mischief (property destruction).
It is key for a complex of this size to have appropriate lighting and signage. "No Trespassing"
signs should be posted in conspicuous locations throughout the property, including entrances
to the property and parking areas.
Parking LoUParking Garages
Lighting is the number one deterrent to crime. Theft from motor vehicle is the most common
occurring crime in our City, and I would expect the parking areas within this project will be
susceptible. Appropriate lighting in and around the parking areas is imperative. Although the
responsibility for property protection belongs to the driver of the vehicle, if individuals don't
feel safe and secure within this pavilion, they will not frequent it. Signage should also be
posted within the parking garage advising customers of The Landing to not leave valuables
within sight and to secure their vehicles.
It's recommended that surveillance equipment be installed in .ill[ parking locations, and
signage stating such, be posted in conspicuous locations through all parking areas.
I recommend the placement of emergency call-posts within all parking areas (both lots and
garages). For the safety and convenience of those using these parking facilities, it's
Security Survey Page 2 of 3 07-048
recommended that the ell ors be placed in the middle of E. I garage level, to include
surveillance cameras in and around the elevator lobby.
Thoroughfares
Pedestrian walkways should be well-lit and not closed off by any solid fencing or walls.
Walkways should be open and exposed to other pedestrians, vehicles, and adjacent
businesses.
Miscellaneous
If there are to be payphones installed. they should be stand-alone structures, away from
neighboring business, and should only accept outgoing calls to deter drug activity.
Public restrooms, independent from the individual businesses, should be monitored on a
regular basis by security or maintenance personnel, and should be secured at closing.
The "retail street" should be lined with cement bollards to assist in preventing vehicles from
crossing into the path of pedestrians. These bollards can also deter criminals from
committing a "smash and grab" by utilizing vehicles to break into businesses.
Park-like settings, such as the one built in and around The Landing, tend to attract
skateboarding enthusiasts. It's recommend that all seat walls, retaining walls, and elongated
planters have "bumpers" installed to deter these individuals from using them as "riding rails".
Light standards should be protected from vandalism by installing "cages" or guards around
light fixtures.
I highly recommend that the developer have a Renton Police Crime Prevention
Representative conduct a personalized security survey for each individual structure once they
are complete.
Security Survey Page 3 of 3 07-048
City Or ",enton Department of Planning / Building / Publ," Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: !,I:
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-048, SA-M, BSP
APPLICANT: The Boeing Company.
PROJECT TITLE: Landing 2 Master Plan
SITE AREA:
LOCATION: Bounded by Logan Ave N, Garden Ave N, N 8th St
& N 6'h Street
COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 5, 2007
DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 22, 2007
PROJECT MANAGE~ . ..-<C::-,
PLAN REvl~n lilian ), \ (, .~
WORK ORDER NO: 77755
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Master Site Plan approval and Binding Site Plan approval. The subject site
totals approximately 42 acres in area and is located within the Urban Center North - 1 (UCN-1) zoning designation. The proposal
would result in the creation of 8 additional lots on the project site. Three of the lots are proposed for redevelopment with retail andlor
multi family residential. If the lots were redeveloped with only retail the project would result in the construction of approximately
332,400 square feet of retail space. If the project site were developed with a combination of muti family residential and retail the
project would result in the construction of 280,500 square feet of retail and 461,500 square feet of residential.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Mjnor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water Light/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shore/ine Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where addiliont:!]atiOn is needed to properly assess Ihis proposal.
Signature of Director or Authorized R Date
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
June 8, 2007
Jill Ding
Jan Illian x7216
THE LANDING 2 MASTER SITE PLAN LUA07~48, SA-M, BSP
701-Park Ave North
I have reviewed the application for The Landing 2 Master Site Plan located at 701 -Park Ave North and have
the following comments:
EXISTING CONDITIONS
I. There are existing utilities and street improvements on and around this site.
GENERAL COMMENTS
I. Installation of new and relocation of existing water main, fire hydrants, sewer and storm will be required
on site.
2. Separate civil plans prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer
will be required.
3. System Development Charges (if not previously paid) for water and sewer will be required to be paid at
the time the utility permit is issued for construction.
4. Applicant will be required to meet fire flow requirements.
5. Separate fees and permits are required for water meters, irrigation meters, side sewers, storm connections,
and backflow devices will be required.
6. Erosion Control shall comply with the latest edition of Dept. of Ecology's Storrnwater Management
Manual.
Kayren Kittrick
• City 0, "enton Department of Planning / Building / Pub,," Norks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PIM K-0v.".N..i
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-04a, SA-M, BSP
APPLICANT: The Boeinq Company
PROJECT TITLE: Landinq 2 Master Plan
SITE AREA:
LOCATION: Bounded by Logan Ave N, Garden Ave N, N alh St
& N 6th Street
COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 5, 2007
DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 22,2007
PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dinq '''v "
PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian "'n, '" I.UUf
BUILDING AREA (qross): 742,000 square fe6\UILDING DIVISION
WORK ORDER NO: 77755
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Master Site Plan approval and Binding Site Plan approval. The subject site
totals approximately 42 acres in area and is located within the Urban Center North· 1 (UCN-1) zoning designation. The proposal
would result in the creation of a additional lots on the project site. Three of the lots are proposed for redevelopment with retail andlor
multi family residential. If the lots were redeveloped with only retail the project would result in the construction of approximately
332,400 square feet of retail space. If the project site were developed with a combination of muti family residential and retail the
project would result in the construction of 280,500 square feet of retail and 461,500 square feet of residential.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non·Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housinq
Air Aesthetics
Water Li hriG/are
Plants Recreation
Land/Shore/ine Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ HistondCultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLlCY·RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
, .
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposa/.
Signature of Direct
City o. nenton Department of Planning! Building! Pub.l. Narks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'I ro-n'S «cf-h.-h \:\,'\
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-048. SA-M, B~P
APPLICANT: The Boeing Company
PROJECT TITLE: Landing 2 Master Plan
SITE AREA:
LOCATION: Bounded by Logan Ave N, Garden Ave N. N 8th St
& N 6th Street
COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 5, 2007
DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 22,2007
PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dina RECEIVED
PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian UAV ~ ~ 1nn1
n'
BUILDING AREA (gross): 742,000 square feet
WORK ORDER NO: 77755
BUILDING OIVI~IUN
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Master Site Plan approval and Binding Site Plan approval. The subject site
totals approximately 42 acres in area and is located within the Urban Center North - 1 (UCN-1) zoning designation. The proposal
would result in the creation of 8 additional lots on the project site. Three of the lots are proposed for redevelopment wilh retail andlor
multi family residential. If the lois were redeveloped with only retail Ihe project would result in the construction of approximalely
332.400 square feel of relail space. If the project site were developed with a combination of muti family residential and retail the
project would result in the construction of 280,500 square feet of retail and 461,500 square feet of residential.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housin
Air Aesthetics
Water Li hi/Glare
Plants Recrealion
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy! Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10.000 Feet
14,000 Feel
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those iJreas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposiJl.
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
May 30, 2007
Jill Ding
Sonja J. Fesser ~
Boeing Lakeshore Landing 2 Binding Site Plan, LUA-07-048-BSP
Format and Legal Description Review
Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced binding site plan submittal and have the
following comments:
Comments for the Applicant:
Note the City of Renton land use action numher and land record number, LUA-07-048-BSP
and LND-35-0016, respectively, on all three drawing sheets in the spaces already provided.
NOTE: The type size used for the land record number should be smaller than that used for
the land use action number.
Remove all references to parking stalls and other items not directly impacting the
subdivision.
Remove the reference to zoning (upper left-hand corner of Sheet 2 of 3).
Note whether the properties adjoining "TRACT R"(on the west side) are platted (note plat
name and lot and block numbers) or unplatted. Note whether the properties east of Garden
Ave N and opposite "LOT 7B" and "LOT 7C" are platted or unplatted.
Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or
calculated, if any.
Note that if there are restrictive covenants, agreements or easements to others (City of
Renton, etc.) as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the binding
site plan. A reference to the associated easements, agreements, etc., plus spaces for the
recording numbers thereof, should be noted on the binding site plan submittal.
\H:\File Sys\LND· Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND<~5 ~ Binding Site Plans\OO16\RV070530.doc
June 8, 2007
Page 2
Add CITY OF RENTON to the title line for the "ADMINISTRATOR OF PLANNING/
BUILDINGIPUBLIC WORKS"(Sheet I of 3).
The "DIVISION OF RECORDS AND ELECTIONS" block is not needed (Sheet I of 3).
How is "LOT SE" going to be accessed?
Fee Review Comments:
The Fee Review Sheet for this review of the preliminary binding site plan is provided for
your use and information.
Comments for the Project Manager:
Is it necessary to have an approval bock for "King County Finance Division Certification"?
If not, have the applicant remove it from the submittal (Sheet I of 3).
H:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Recof(I~\LND-J5 -Binding Site Plans\0016\RV070530.doc\cor
PROPERTYS CES FEE REVIEW FOR SUBDIVISlor o. 2007 ---s;e..,;5:>-~~
APPLICANT: "1l::+'E -eoe.1 ~ CCIM'1!?,Lb.L'( RECEIVED FROM ---~--c-c-
I.urn .. j ST J/( i-l . ..-rI-\ eT.. (date)
JOBADDRESS:BOUL!r>eT7:N'IOCij ... lI4....e-U.IdC; .. :~ won 771':56 ~ ~A=~~~~~~~ri~ cg;ruk~~~~ :}~Nrf;L~~~ NE~ORE I~JIO:'5-':''i~tL DESCRIPTION
SHORT PLAT, BINDING SITE PLAN, ETC. PID #'s VICINITY MAP
FINAL REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION, THIS REVIEW REPLACES SQUARE FOOTAGE OTHER
PRELIMINARY FEE REVIEW DATED FRONT FOOTAGE
SUBJECT PROPERTY PARENT PID# 'J2e30o~cu 5..-0115)( NEW KING CO. TAX ACCT.#(s) are required when
e>8.e.:605~ q a~ ) ~qOlq assigned by King County.
It is the intent of this development fee analysis to ~t¥em;/~r on notice, that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon
development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and
off-site improvements (i.e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and
determined by the applicable Utility Section.
Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building PermitlConstmction Permit
application.
The existing house on SP Lot # , addressed as has not previously paid
-,-,--,-,--:; SDC fees, due to connection to City utilities prior to existance of SDC fee Ord. SP Lot# will be
subject to future SDC fees if triggering mechanisms are touched within current City Ordinances.
We understand that this subdivision is in the preliminary ~tage and that we will have the opportunity to review it again before recordation.
The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits, r/w pennit fees or the cost of water meters.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE
Latecomer A2reement (pvt) WATER ~O-
Latecomer A~ent (Ilvt) WASTEWATER -O~
Latecomer A2reement (pvt) OTHER -0 -
/
Special Assessment DistrictlW A TER /~O-
/
Special Assessment DistrictlW ASTEW ATER ,.. -0-
Joint Use A2reement (METRO) •
Local Improvement District • .
Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP, CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION -
FUTURE OBLIGATIONS ~
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -WATER " Estimated #OFUNITSI SDCFEE
" Pd Prev. ,. Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) .. Never Pd SQ. FTG.
Sin2le family residential $1 9561unit x
Mobile home dwellin2 unit $1,956lunit in park 'l' L..\V
Apartment, Condo $1 1741unit not in CD or COR zones x I ..,.~' .JA
Conunereiailindustrial, $0.273Isq. fl. of property (not less than $1,956.00) x ~ <t)v <?\.-.6-V'
Boeing, by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter (2,800 GPM threshold) ...... ' , \\V .~
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -WASTEWATER" Estimated ~~"1:1 .~ ..,),. ~. ~ \;.1
.. Pd Prevo .. Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) .. Never Pd .. '5((
Sinl!le family residential $I,Ol7lunit x • ...lY' ~. [
Mobile home dweUin. unit $I,OI7/unit x -, \' , "" Apartment. Condo $6101unit not in CD or COR zones x ~~T /
Commercial/Industrial $0.142Isq. ft. of property x(not less than $1,017.00) ." J
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -SURFACEWATER .. Estimated ..... .. Pd Prevo .. Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) .. Never Pd
Single family residential and mobile borne dwelling unit $759lunit x
All other properties $0.26Slsq ft or new impervious area or property x
(not less than $759.00)
I PRELIMINARY TOTAL $
,~.~ ) 0. .l 'l.. .$1 .. J 5/2.'!'>/n'1
'< tv • 0 • " 0
Signa::r:r Revi(:fng Authority DA'rE '
.." ,
" .. *If sub t property is within an LID, it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. fOI" paidJun.paid status . ~ ~ .. ". Square footage figures are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are subject to change. • < .. Current City SDC fee charges apply to 0
0
EFFECTIVE January 2, 2006
City of kenton Department of Planning I Building I PUb./v Narks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: CPr~· ',~ ;::',r(~:,
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-048, SA-~, BSP-'
APPLICANT: The Boeing Company
PROJECT TITLE: Landing 2 Master Plan
SITE AREA:
LOCATION: Bounded by Logan Ave N, Garden Ave N, N 8'h St
& N 6th Street
COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 5, 2007
DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 22, 2007
PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Ding
PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian "~
BUILDING AREA (gross): 742,000 square feet
WORK ORDER NO: 77755
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Master Site Plan approval and Binding Site Plan approval. The subject site
totals approximately 42 acres in area and is located within the Urban Center North - 1 (UCN-1) zoning designation. The proposal
would result in the creation of 8 additional lots on the project site. Three of the lots are proposed for redevelopment with retail andlor
multi family residential. If the lots were redeveloped with only retail the project would result in the construction of approximately
332,400 square feet of retail space. If the project site were developed with a combination of muti family residential and retail the
project would result in the construction of 280,500 square feet of retail and 461,500 square feet of residential.
A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth HOLisin
Air Aesthetics
Water Light/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use utilities
Animals TranslJorlation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy! HistondCultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
City Or r<enton Department of Planning / Building / Pub .. v Norks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pajr'k..,<,
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-048, SA-M, BSP
zw wen
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Master Site Plan approval and Binding Site Plan approval. The subject site
totals approximately 42 acres in area and is located within the Urban Center North - 1 (UCN-1) zoning designation. The proposal
would result in the creation of 8 additional lots on the project site. Three of the lots are proposed for redevelopment with retail and/or
multi family residential. If the lots were redeveloped with only retail the project would result in the construction of approximately
332,400 square feet of retail space. If the project site were developed with a combination of muti family residential and retail the
project would result in the construction of 280,500 square feet of retail and 461,500 square feet of residential.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e,g, Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable Mo,"
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air
Water
Plants
Land/Shoreline Use
Animals ~.
Environmental Health Public SeNiees
Energy/
Natural Resources
';~'"nn ,;
1d:nnnF'P1
B, POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative
City o ... enton Department of Planning / Building / Pub,," ~Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ai ( Dc< +-
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-048. SA-M. BSP
APPLICANT: The Boeinq Company
PROJECT TITLE: Landinq 2 Master Plan
SITE AREA:
LOCATION: Bounded by Logan Ave N. Garden Ave N, N 8th St
& N 6th Street
COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 5, 2007
DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 22.2007
PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dinq
PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian
BUILDING AREA (qross): 742.000 square feet
WORK ORDER NO: 77755
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Master Site Plan approval and Binding Site Plan approval. The subject site
totals approximately 42 acres in area and is located within the Urban Center North -1 (UCN-1) zoning designation~ The proposal
would result in the creation of 8 additional lots on the project site. Three of the lots are proposed for redevelopment with retail andlor
multi family residential. If the lots were redeveloped with only retail the project would result in the construction of approximately
332,400 square feet of retail space. If the project site were developed with a combination of muti family residential and retail the
project would result in the construction of 280.500 square feet of retail and 461,500 square feet of residential.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housinq
Air Aesthetics
Water Light/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation >CJ
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ HistoridCu/tural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airporl Environment X 10,000 Feet
14.000 Feet
Date ' 7
JHIEing - Landing 2 Master Site I"lan .
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Hi Jeff,
Jill Ding
jeffrey.r.adelson@boeing.com
05/24/20072: 15:54 PM
Landing 2 Master Site Plan
Neil, Suzanne, Alex, and I met and conducted an initial review of the master site plan that was submitted
for subdistrict 1-b. We would like to see some tweaks made to the master site plan before it is approved
and would like to set up a meeting. Neil has been on vacation this week and I will be on vacation next
week, so I'd like to set something up the week of June 4-8.
Just for your information here is a list of the revisions that we'd like to see to the site plan:
1. Define a hierarchy of streets (High Visibility (Logan), areterial, pedestrian oriented (Park and other
internal streets?);
2. Provide a mid block street (public or private). this does not have to be constructed right away as the
existing Data Hub is located in the vicinity;
3. Provide a deSignated pedestrian connection to the Landing to the north and additional pathways
through the development;
4. On the residential option, move the parking behind the buildings;
5. Add another option showing the possibility for a transit center on the northeast portion of the site.;
6. Show the most updated Landing site plan abutting the project to the north:
7. Identify a gateway feature at the corner of 6th and Logan.
Please give me a few times when you'd be available to meet so that I can coordinate everyone's
schedules.
Thanks!
Jill K. Ding
Senior Planner
City of Renton
1055 S Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
jding@ci.renton.wa.us
Ph (425) 430-7219
Fx: (425) 430-7300
Page 1 I
City Of nenton Department of Planning I Building I Pub,,~ Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C£Jr L<,+r .L(;tiDn
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-048, SA-M, BSP
APPLICANT: The Boeing Company
PROJECT TITLE: Landing 2 Master Plan
SITE AREA:
LOCATION: Bounded by Logan Ave N, Garden Ave N, N 8th St
& N 6th Street
COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 5, 2007
DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 22, 2007
PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Ding RECEIVED
PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian MAY' 3 7007
BUILDING AREA (gross): 742,000 sQuafl'.f~~l
WORK ORDER NO: 77755
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Master Site Plan approval and Binding Site Plan approval. The subject site
totals approximately 42 acres in area and is located within the Urban Center North - 1 (UCN-1) zoning designation. The proposal
would result in the creation of 8 additional lots on the project site. Three of the lots are proposed for redevelopment with retail andlor
multi family residential. If the lots were redeveloped with only retail the project would result in the construction of approximately
332,400 square feet of retail space. If the project site were developed with a combination of muti family residential and retail the
project would result in the construction of 280,500 square feet of retail and 461,500 square feet of residential.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water Light/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utifities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy! Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feel
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas wh additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Date
City o. nenton Department of Planning / Building / Pub.,c Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPL/CA TION~!EJ'V[::;S:Hi:!E1! I["I!
REVIEWINGDEPARTMENT:fjre.... COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 5,:200,1 1::1 !
APPLICATION NO: LUA07-048, SA-M, BSP DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 22, 2007"i MAY 2 2 2007 ;: L~
APPLICANT: The Boeinq Company PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dinq/ i
PROJECT TITLE: Landinq 2 Master Plan
SITE AREA:
LOCATION: Bounded by Logan Ave N, Garden Ave N, N 8th St
& N 61h Street
!''fY Cc '~':f" ~j"T."'J
PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian " , ' 'r
" .. ,
BUILDING AREA (gross): 742,000 square feet
WORK ORDER NO: 77755
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Master Site Plan approval and Binding Site Plan approval. The subject site
totals approximately 42 acres in area and is located within the Urban Center North, 1 (UCN-1) zoning designation, The proposal
would result in the creation of 8 additional lots on the project site, Three of the lots are proposed for redevelopment with retail and/or
multi family residential. If the lots were redeveloped with only retail the project would result in the construction of approximately
332,400 square feet of retail space, If the project site were developed with a combination of muti family residential and retail the
project would result in the construction of 280,500 square feet of retail and 461,500 square feet of residential.
A, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e,g, Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housin
Air Aesthetics
Warer LighVG/are
Plants Recreation ./
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities '" Animals Transportation ,
Environmental Health Public Services ./
Energy/ HistondCultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C,
b4.
Il'd c(! ~;
articular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
ed to properly assess this proposa/. ~A i
Signature of,iDir tor or Authorized Repres tative Date
I
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
A MaI!ter Application has baen flied and ac~epted with tha Development Services Division of the C~ of Renton.
The followln!! br1efly describes the apphca!,on and the necassary Public Approvals.
PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: L ""ding 2 t.hs\~r PI"n f LUA07-048. SA_M, SSP
PROJECT DESCRIPTION" The appllc',,"! ,$ reo;;uestin9, Master Site Plan approval and Binding Sile Plan
oval The subect site totals approx,malely 4l ac,,,," '" area and IS,located Wlll1,n Ihe Urban Center North·1 (UeN-1)
:n desi natlo~ The proposal w[)lI:1 r<2sJ,t In the oe~t an of 8 addlllon~IIQls on the project site. Three of the lots are ropO~ I~r redevelopment With retal ~1,JiOT l1Jll,-r,,,I1,ly resldenj'31 If the lots were redaveloped With only r~lall the
P ect would result In the ~on$truCl'cn cl ~~prcxlmalel)' 3.'2,4.00 square feet of 'elall s.pace If Ihe project SIte were ~~IOped with a combination of mu\l-I~rn I~ ce;;ldeo:lal ~"J retail Ihe projecl would resull In the construction of 280,500
~quare leet 01 retail and 461,500 square feEt of reSidential
PROJECT LOCATION:
PUBUC APPROVALS:
BOl.rdeli ul LOJ<I-; Ave N, Garden Ave N. N 6th 51 & N 6th Street
Master c;lte Pldr1 and Binding S,te Plan apprO\lals
APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON Jelfr .. , 1>.(l0I50n, Boeing Really Corp.; Tel (206) 650-5960,
Er'1l. ,,,lfrey r ad"lson@boelng.com
Comments on tt-.e above application must be submitted in wnling to Jill O,"g. Senior Pl;1nne\ Developmlml
S."..Ie.s Divil:lion. 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA %057, by 5:00 PM on June~, 2007. If you ave quesl<OnS
about this proposal, or wish ro be m~,J~ ~ par:i o· re~,'rcI and receive additional no~'f'''''tion by ma'l, co~~c: I:;: :;~~
Manager al (4251 430-7219 Anyone wl:<, sub'" t5 ,,,,,ter, comments w,11 automahca,ly become a party 0 eco
be notified 01 a~y deCISion on thiS prc'I~,"1
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION
DATE OF APPLICATION:
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION
May 7, 2007
May 22, 2007
II you would like to be made a parI\' o~ reccr~ 10 rece,,'8 further onformation on thiS proposed prOJe~l, complete lhls iorm
and return to City of Renton, Deve,c~ment Clla'""ng 10"5 South Grady W;ry, Renton. WA 9B05
File Name I No Landing 2 MaSl." ~t31' LUAD,-04R, SA-M, SSP
N~E ________________ -=~============================= MAILING ADDRESS, _____________ _
TELEPHONE NO
CERTIFICATION
I, ~ q/~ , hereby certify that '7 copies of the above doC!~~~\\\q'jl
-~ .......... ~)'.j;" ~t, I were posted by me in ---.L-conspicuous places or nearby the described prope~ ._, , .. ,~", ''it;~111
DATE: S"·Zz.·O? SIGNED: ~;c~~+)-' ":~\\
.,: _e_ )!:~
A TIEST: Subscnbed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, III and for the State of Washington resi~"\ ·"VfI",.fJ J<t j
'~~<'19-\Q/", :£ .c:::: -A---I rc( 'It. ~W ........... ~ ~~$ ,)J fII ",do ,On the d'3 day of t1'rL]' . ~ "' .......
1l .. ","
...
CITY OF RENTON
CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
On the 22 nd day of May, 2007, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope
containing Acceptance Letter and NOA documents. This information was sent to:
Name
Jeffrey Adelson
Surrounding Property Owners -NOA only
(Signature of Sender):, ~ ~£"hV""
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) SS
COUNTY OF KING )
Contact
See Attached
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker
Representing
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and
purposes mentioned in the instrument.
Dated: 5100/07
,"\\;;,,,,,
Project Name: Landing 2 Master Plan
Project Number: LUA07-048, SA-M, BSP
722400088000
BOEING COMPANY THE
100 N RIVERSIDE M/C 5003-4027
CHICAGO IL 60606
722450021505
FIX GRACE
15004 SE 18TH ST
BELLEVUE WA 98007
722450005003
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SEATTLE
SOUTH KING COUNTY
13925 INTERURBAN AVE S STE A
SEATTLE WA 98168
722450031504
JEFF'S AUTO REPAIR INC
21701 HIGHWAY 99 #A
LYNNWOOD WA 98036
722450018501
MORELAND DON & BOB
809 NO 6TH #3
RENTON WA 98055
722300001004
PACCARINC
ATTN: CORP ACCOUNTING
PO BOX 1518
BELLEVUE WA 98009
722450009005
RUSSO ROBERT A
528 WELLS AVE NORTH
RENTON WA 98055
088660003000
TARGET CORPORATION
1000 NICOLLET MALL
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55403
722450029003
UYSAL MEHMET +RAZIYE
529 WILLIAMS AVE N
RENTON WA 98055
722450004501
WEISS CONNIE J
531 PELLY AVE N
RENTON WA 98055
088660007001
BOEING REALTY CORP
15480 LAGUNA CANYON RD #200
IRVINE CA 92618
722450030001
FRANKLIN IRA L+BEVERLY K
537 WILLIAMS AVE NORTH
RENTON WA 98055
722450019004
HOLMES DENNIS W
546 N WILLIAMS
RENTON WA 98055
722450017008
KAERCHER RICK
PO BOX 8
HOBART WA 98025
722450030506
MUNSON RONALD W+ELIZABETH A
623 CEDAR AVE S
RENTON WA 98055
722450008502
PETCHNICK GRATZER &
GUNDERSON
534 WELLS AVE N
RENTON WA 98055
722450017503
SCHULTZ NORMAN+MARIAN
7634 S SUNNYCREST RD
SEATTLE WA 98178
082305901900
THE BOEING COM PANY
TAX DEPT MAIL CODE 5003-4027
100 NORTH RIVERSIDE
CHICAGO IL 60606
722450032502
VIDELL VICTOR E+LANCE M
536 BURNETT AVE N
RENTON WA 98055
722450006506
WONG PHILIP J
4067 24TH PL S
SEATTLE WA 98108
072305909805
FEDERAL RECOVERY OF WA
PO BOX 1435
TACOMA WA 98401
722450007504
FRIEND VICKIE D
540 WELLS AVE N
RENTON WA 98055
722450031009
JEFF'S AUTO REPAIR INC
21701 HIGHWAY 99 #A
LYNNWOOD WA 98036
722400092507
KURASPEDCANI TIM
PO BOX 208
MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038
722450016000
NICOLI MARIO J
529 WELLS AVE N
RENTON WA 98052
722400086509
RIFFLE GARY+LINDA
16846 188TH AVE SE
RENTON WA 98058
722450008007
SIMMS DANIEL+VICKIE FRIEND
20901 134TH PL SE
KENT WA 98042
088660004008
TRANSWESTERN HARVEST LKSHOR
150 N WACKER DR #800
CHICAGO IL 60606
722450018006
WEBB PAUL+MELINDA L
541 WELLS AVE N
RENTON WA 98055
082305912709
WOODALL WENDELL
329 NW 2ND PL
RENTON WA 98055
J -
722450029508
YOUNKIN RONALD M
535 WILLIAMS AVE N
RENTON WA 98055
Mark Clement
Boeing Land Use Administration Facilities
Asset Management
Boeing Commercial Airplane Group
PO Box 307 #MS 1 W-09
Seattle, WA 98124-2207
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton.
The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals.
PROJECT NAMElNUMBER: Landing 2 Master Plan 1 LUA07-048, SA-M, BSP
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Master Site Plan approval and Binding Site Plan
approval. The subject site totals approximately 42 acres in area and is located within the Urban Center North -1 (UCN-1)
zoning designation. The proposal would result in the creation of 8 additional lots on the project site. Three of the lots are
proposed for redevelopment with retail and/or multi-family residential. If the lots were redeveloped with only retail the
project would result in the construction of approximately 332,400 square feet of retail space. If the project site were
developed with a combination of muti-family residential and retail the project would result in the construction of 280,500
square feet of retail and 461,500 square feet of residential.
PROJECT LOCATION: Bounded by Logan Ave N, Garden Ave N, N 8th St & N 6th Street
PUBLIC APPROVALS: Master Site Plan and Binding Site Plan approvals
APPLICANTlPROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Jeffrey Adelson, Boeing Realty Corp.; Tel: (206) 650-5960;
Eml: jeffrey.r.adelson@boeing.com
Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jill Ding, Senior Planner, Development
Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on June 5, 2007. If you have questions
about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project
Manager at (425) 430-7219. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will
be notified of any decision on this project.
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FtLE IDENTIFICATION
DATE OF APPLICATION:
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION:
May 7, 2007
May 22, 2007
If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form
and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057.
File Name f No.: Landing 2 Master Plan f LUA07 -048, SA-M, SSP
NAME: ______________________________________________________________ ___
MAILING ADDRESS: _______________________________________________________ _
TELEPHONE NO.: _______________________ __
May 22,2007
Jeffrey Adelson
. Boeing Realty Corp.
M/C 6R6-10, Triton Tower
700 S Renton Village Place
Renton, W A 98055
Subject: Landing 2 Master Plan
LUA07-058, SA-M, BSP
Dear Mr. Adelson:
CITY eF RENTON
Planning/Building/Public Works Department
Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator
The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject
application is complete a{;cording to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted·
for review.
It is tentatively scheduled for .consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on
June 18, 2007. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is
required to continue processing your application.
Please contact meat (425) 430-7219 if you have any questions.
Sincerely, .
c[JJ 1{ t27J' 0111 K,:Ding
. Senior Planner .
~_---'------'------'----___ --"--,---C-----'-'-'--'--.~
105.5 South Gni'!r. W. ay -Renton, Washington 98057
. " W ·This paperconlains 50% recycled materia!. 30% postconsumet"
AHEAD OF' 'niE. CURVE
~
May 7, 2007
Mr. Neil Watts
Boeing Realty Corporation
;J_e} 80x 3-:(~7, Me 6R6-10
Scar: (:, V'.j/\ 98124-2207
Development Services Director
City of Renton
lOSS S. Grady Way
Renton, W A 98057
CITYOF~ENTON
QECEIVED
MAY 07 2007
aUILDING DIVISION
OEVELOPME
CITY OF'Z:~~%NING
MAY -7 2007
RECEIVED
BOEING ! Subject: Master Plan for Sub-District IB and Binding Site Plan for Boeing
Lakeshore Landing 2
Dear Neil:
The Boeing Company is plcascd to submit a joint Land Use Permit Master
Application for a Master Plan for Sub-District IB and a Binding Site Plan for Boeing
Lakeshore Landing 2.
As we discussed with the City, the Master Plan is comprised ofthree parts: the
Retail Area, the RetaillResidential Area, and the Boeing Remainder. The Retail Area
makes up the northern portion of the property along 8th Avenue and is available for near-
term redevelopment (with the exception of one portion of the existing, industrial building
that will remain as a "Boeing Data Hub"). The RetaillResidential Area is proposed for
near-term redevelopment of either a small, retail village or a residential over retail
development, , consistent with the alternative vision for that parcel set forth in the
Conceptual Plan. The Boeing Remainder consists of the southern portion of Sub-District
I B and contains existing office and laboratory space and land with future redevelopment
potential which is unlikely to be surplused and sold prior to 2016.
Boeing seeks the City's approval of the Sub-District IB Master Plan so that it can
record the Binding Site Plan for Boeing Lakeshore Landing 2 and create eight additional
lots.
If you have any questions regarding this joint application, please do not hesitate to
contact me at 206-650-5960.
Sincer
mOOJ.(1166/LEGALl3217562.1
,
City of Renton DEVELOPME
CITY OFj!J;NTPLANNING "-ON LAND USE PERMIT MAY -1 2007
MASTER APPLICATIONRECEIVED
PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION
NAME: The Boeing Company PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Master Plan for
Subdistrict 1 B and Binding Site Plan for Boei ng Lakeshore
ADDRESS: MlC 6R6-10, Triton Tower, 700 S. Renton Landing 2
Village Place
PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE:
CITY: Renton ZIP: Bounded by Logan Avenue N., Garden Avenue N., North
98055 8th Street, and North 6th Street, Renton, WA 98055
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 206-650-5960 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S):
088660-0050-05; 722300-0105-00; 082305-9209-00;
082305-9019-00; 722300-0115-08
APPLICANT (if other than owner)
NAME: EXISTING LAND USE(S): EXisting Boeing buildings, vacant
land, vacant buildings.
COMPANY (if applicable): PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Uses allowed in UCN-l
ADDRESS: EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:
UCN
CITY: ZIP: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION
(if applicable): N/A
TELEPHONE NUMBER
EXISTING ZONING: UCN-l
CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): N/A
NAME: Jeffrey Adelson SITE AREA (in square feet): Master Plan Area 1,843,871
Binding Site Plan Area 1,650,800
COMPANY (if applicable): Boeing Realty Corp.
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE
DEDICATED: N/A
ADDRESS: M/C 6R6-10, Triton Tower, 700 S. Renton
Village Place SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS:
N/A
CITY: Renton ZIP:98055 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET
ACRE (if applicable): Less than 150 d.u I net acre
TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: (ReSidential over retail option only, if exercised)
206-650-5960 ieffrey.r .adelson@boeing.com NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): Eight
Q:wcb/pw/devserv/fonns/planninglmasterapp.dnc 03/12/07
P JECT INFORMATION (cont led)
NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 360
(Residential over retail option only, if exercised)
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE
NEW PROJECT (if applicable): N/A
NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: N/A
N/A
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (if applicable): 461,500 (Residential over retail
option only, if exercised)
IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF
ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE
SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): N/A
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (if applicable): 332,400 Retail option; 280,500
Residential over retail option
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): 418,000
NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if
applicable): Approximately 332,400 Retail option;
Approximately 280,500 Residentlaf over retail option
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE
AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO
FLOOD HAZARD AREA
GEOLOGIC HAZARD
HABITAT CONSERVATION
SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES
WETLANDS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
I--_Olo:.::~ legal on sheet with the foI1n ... ;nn information ;n~h .A"!dl
LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED
TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES
List all land use applications being applied for:
1. Master Site Plan
2. Binding Site Plan
3.
4.
Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ ___ _
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
I, (Print Name/s) .r _" declare that I am (please check one) the current owner of the property
involved in this application or ~ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing
statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
The Boeing Company, a Delaware 7
/
(Signature of Owner/Representative)
Alan E. DeFrancls
Authorized Signatory
Q:weblpw/devserv/fonns/planninglmasterapp.doc
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ---;:;-cc~-,---;----;---:c----;cc-:o
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the
uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Notary (PrintJ _____________ _
My appointment expires:. _________ _
2 03112107
,
ALL PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
State of ___ ----'C"'a"'lif"'o"'rn"'i"a ______ :
SS
county of, ___ -'L"'o"'s'-'A"'n-"Q"e"le"'s"-____ _
On March 13, 2007 before me, _____ -'S"'U"'S"'A"N,!:N"',,,J"'IM"'E"'N,,EZ"',,!:N"'o"'T"'A!l,RYl..!...P"'UB"'L'"IC,,--~
Personally appeared ALAN E. DEFRANCIS
lSI Personally known to me o Proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) isJaFe
subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he!sAB,~ABY executed
the same in his/ABrllhair authorized capacities,
and that by his!hBr~hBir signature(s) on the
instrument the person(s), or the entity upon
behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the
instrument.
I
(Signature r
-------------------------------------------OJ1t;),flli/-------------------------------------------
Though the information below is not required by la w, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could
prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document: ________________________ _
Document Date: _____________ Number of Pages: __ -'2=---__
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: _____________________ _
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer
Signer's Name:, ______________________________ _
o Individual o Corporate Officer-Title(s):_--,-______________________ _ o Partner-DLimited 0 General o Attorney-in-Fact o Trustee o Guardian or Conservator o Other ___________________________ _
Signer is Representing: ___________________________ _
SUB-DISTRICT lB MASTER PLAN AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION:
PARCEL A:
PARCEL 1:
LOT A, CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT NO. 093-89, RECORDED NOVEMBER 14, 1989 UNDER
KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8911149006 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY QUIT CLAIM DEED
RECORDED NOVEMBER 9, 1989 UNDER RECORDING NO. 8911090473 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS,
IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED
RECORDED AUGUST 17, 2006 UNDER RECORDING NO. 20060817000718, IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON.
PARCEL 2:
LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4 AND 5 BLOCK 3, RENTON FARM ACREAGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF
RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS, PAGE 37, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
EXCEPT THEREFROM THE NORTH 30.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 1 CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF
RENTON FOR STREET PURPOSES, UNDER RECORDING NO. 5180889 OF OFFIaAL RECORDS;
ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY THAT INSTRUMENT
RECORDED DECEMBER 12, 2006 UNDER RECORDING NO. 20061212000338, IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON;
TOGETHER WITH THE NORTH HALF OF VACATED NORTH 7TH STREET ADJOINING AND THAT
PORTION OF ALLEY ADJOINING ON THE WEST AS VACATED UNDER CITY OF RENTON
ORDINANCE NO. 3319 AND RECORDED MAY 21, 1979 UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO.
7905210642 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
PARCEL 3:
THE NORTH 300.00 FEET OF THE EAST 100.00 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE
MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
EXCEPT THEREFROM THE NORTH 60.00 FEET, THEREOF, CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON,
FOR STREET PURPOSES UNDER RECORDING NO. 5180889 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS;
ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION THEREOF, LYING WITHIN THE WEST 10.00 FEET OF
THAT PORTION OF SAID NORTH 300.00 FEET; LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE
TRANSMISSION LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY, WHICH WAS DEEDED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 3325235 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION WHICH WAS DEEDED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY
DEED RECORDED JUNE 7, 1994 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9406070579 OF OFFIaAL
RECORDS;
ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE aTY OF RENTON BY THAT INSTRUMENT
RECORDED DECEMBER 12, 2006 UNDER RECORDING NO. 20061212000338, IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON.
PARCEL 4:
LOTS 1 AND 2 OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 008-88, RECORDED NOVEMBER 16, 1988 UNDER
RECORDING NO. 8811169001 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
PARCEL 5:
LOT 1, BLOCK 4, RENTON FARM ACREAGE ADDmON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF
RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS, PAGE 37, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
TOGETHER WITH THE SOUTH HALF OF VACATED NORTH 7TH STREET ADJOINING, AS
VACATED UNDER CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NO. 3327;
ALSO TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF ALLEY ADJOINING ON THE WEST, VACATED UNDER
CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NO. 4048, AND RECORDED MARCH 11, 1987 UNDER RECORDING
NO. 8703110578 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
PARCEL 6:
LOT 2, BLOCK 4, RENTON FARM ACREAGE ADDmON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF
RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS, PAGE 37, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF ALLEY ADJOINING ON THE WEST, VACATED UNDER CITY
OF RENTON ORDINANCE NO. 4048, AND RECORDED MARCH 11, 1987 UNDER RECORDING NO.
8703110578 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
PARCEL B:
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8,
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF PARK STREET WITH THE NORTH
LINE OF SIXTH AVENUE NORTH;
THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE 185 FEET;
THENCE WEST 107.5 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 185 FEET;
THENCE EAST 107.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 9,
1972 AND JUNE 7, 1994 UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO'S. 7206090448 AND
9406070574.
PARCEL C:
LOT B OF SHORT PLAT NO. 093-89, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED
NOVEMBER 14, 1989 UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8911149006;
EXCEPT THE PORTION OF THE SOUTHERLY TWO (2) FEET CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF
RENTON BY DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 9, 1989 UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO.
8911090473;
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, WASHINGTON.
i>ARCEL D:
LOT 5 AND TRACT P, BOEING LAKESHORE LANDING, A BINDING SITE PLAN, RECORDED
DECEMBER 23, 2004 UNDER RECORDING NO. 20041223000856, IN VOLUME 225, PAGES 83
THROUGH 86, OF PLATS;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY THAT INSTRUMENT
RECORDED DECEMBER 12, 2006 UNDER RECORDING NO. 20061212000338, IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON.
PARCEL E:
LOTS 3, 4 AND 5, BLOCK 4, RENTON FARM ACREAGE ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS, PAGE 37, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
APN: 722300-0105-00
APN: 082305-9019-00
APN: 082305-9209-00
APN: 088660-0050-05
APN: 722300-0115-08
APN: 088660-0190-06
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS
This requirement may be waived by:
1. Property'Services Section c ~,',' PROJECT NAME: UrAn O\,M'C,Ct
2. Public Works Plan Review Seclion
3. Building Section
4. Development Planning Seclion
DATE: 7/;;2.0/010
Q;\WEEnPWl.OEVSERV'lForms'PJaoning\w;:!ivers.xJs
)
i b f\'toD~ "P/~d-'
BI·I\d..i~ sik -Pk;.M....
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
CITY OF RENTON
MAY - 7 2007
RECEIVED
0512212006
•
, '
,
)
." , , '
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS
This requirement may be waived by:
1. Property Serviges Section
2. Public Works Plan Review Section
PROJECT NAME: -,-,3l!.ULJ\x=9.",;,<,~r!;.!1.r~,,;,c..:.L.f--if_' .\.,bL...!rtICJ!{Ii.5~/~e.r'-iP!WA._ ir "b~ neL ()
DATE:.:.... _....,L)L::~=O.L/..:.O...:~::..,. ___ .,...-_ 8 ,4<-"fl~ 3. Building Section
4. DevelopmenlPlanning Seclion
O;\WE81P~OEVSER\O\Fonns\PI,anoing'waivers.xts 2 0512212006
DEVELOPMEI
CITY OF
ANNING
rON
MAY -72007
page 1
)ject: 32614 RECEWEDrarch 23 12: 08: 38 2006
Parcel Map Check
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel name: LOT 5A
North: 183182.9256 East : 1300856.2648
Line Course: S 89-25-23 E Length: 572.61
North: 183177.1598 East : 1301428.8458
Line Course: N 00-34-37 E Length: 232.50
North: 183409.6480 East : 1301431.1869
Line Course: S 89-25-23 E Length: 158.35
North: 183408.0535 East : 13 01589.5289
Line Course: S 00-34-37 W Length: 232.50
North: 183175.5653 East : 1301587.1877
Line Course: S 89-25-23 E Length: 146.87
North: 183174.0864 East 1301734.0503
Line Course: N 00-57-36 E Length: 55.00
North: 183229.0787 East 1301734.9718
Line Course: S 89-25-23 E Length: 244.96
North: 183226.6121 East : 1301979.9194
Line Course: N 00-58-31 E Length: 520.01
North: 183746.5468 East 1301988.7704
L;'1e Course: N 44-16-19 W Length: 29.35
( North: 183767.5624 East 1301968.2822
Line Course: N 89-28-06 W Length: 1075.94
North: 183777.5462 East 1300892.3886
Line Course: S 45-27-25 W Length: 44.70
North: 183746.1916 East 1300860.5298
Line Course: S 00-22-56 W Length: 538.46
North: 183207.7436 East : 1300856.9378
Curve Length: 24.84 Radius: 597.00
Delta: 2-23-01 Tangent: 12.42
Chord: 24.83 Course: S 01-34-26 W
Course In: N 89-37-04 W Course Out: S 87-14-03 E
RP North: 183211.7262 East 1300259.9510
End North: 183182.9185 East 1300856.2556
Perimeter: 3876.09 Area: 619,004 sq. ft. 14.210 acres
Mapcheck Closure -(Uses
Error Closure: 0.0117
Error North: -0.00717
Precision 1: 331,289.74
listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Course: S 52-04-06 W
East: -0.00920
page 1
;j ect: 32614 Fri September 01 08:07:04 2006
Parcel Map Check
Parcel name: LOT 5B
North: 183179.7760
Line Course: N 89-25-23 W
North: 183182.9262
Curve Length: 211.48
Delta: 20-17-47
Chord: 210.38
Course In: N 87-14-03 W
RP North: 183211.7339
End North: 182977.8708
Curve Length: 210. 56·
Delta: 22-38-06
Chord: 209.20
Course In: S 66-56-16 E
RP North: 182769.0784
End North: 182773.0526
Line Course: S 00-25-38 W
North: 182638.9964
I,; ne Course: S 19-30-18 E
I North: 182601.3296
Curve Length: 45.28
Delta: 64-51-17
Chord: 42.90
Course In: N 70-29-42 E
RP North: 182614.6851
End North: 182574.8788
Line Course: S 84-21-35 E
North: 182572.2399
Line Course: S 00-53-51 W
North: 182567.1605
Line Course: S 88-55-30 E
North: 182563.5402
Line Course: S 88-45-39 E
North: 182560.8045
Line Course: N 00-57-03 E
North: 183179.7893
East: 1301169.1002
Length: 312.85
East: 1300856.2661
Radius: 597.00
Tangent: 106.86
Course: S 12-54-50 W
Course Out: S 66-56-16 E
East: 1300259.9615
East: 1300809.2493
Radius: 533.00
Tangent: 106.67
Course: S 11-44-41 W
Course Out: N 89-34-22 W
East: 1301299.6519
East: 1300766.6667
Length: 134.06
East
Length: 39. 96
East
Radius:
Tangent:
Course:
Course Out:
East
East
Length: 26.85
East
Length: 5.08
East
Length: 192.97
1300765.6671
1300779.0093
40.00
25.41
S 51-55-57 E
S 05-38-25 W
1300816.7138
1300812.7825
1300839.5025
1300839.4230
East: 1301032.3590
Length: 126.50
East: 1301158.8294
Length: 619.07
East 1301169.1025
Perimeter: 1924.67 Area: 226,140 sq. ft. 5.191 acres
Mapcheck Closure -(Uses
Error Closure: 0.0135
Error North: 0.01330
Precision 1: 142,567.41
listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Course: N 09-49-21 E
East: 0.00230
page 1
Jject: 32614 Thu March 23 12:08:34 2006
Parcel Map Check
Parcel name: LOT 5C
North: 183176.8266
Line Course: S 00-57-36 W
North: 182558.9033
Line Course: N 89-26-20 W
North: 182561.7713
Line Course: N 00-57-03 E
North: 183179.7762
Line Course: S 89-25-23 E
North: 183176.8263
East: 1301462.0405
Length: 618.01
East: 1301451.6861
Length: 292.86
East: 1301158.8401
Length: 618.09
East: 1301169.0970
Length: 292.96
East 1301462.0421
Perimeter: 1821.92 Area: 181,027 sq. ft. 4.156 acres
Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed
Error Closure: 0.0017
Error North: -0.00030
Precision 1: 1,071,717.65
courses, radii, and deltas)
Course: S 79-53-59 E
East: 0.00166
page 1
j
i ,ject: 32614 Thu March 23 12:08:32 2006
Parcel Map Check
Parcel name: LOT 5D
North: 183174.0879 East : 1301734. 0545
Line Course: S 00-57-36 W Length: 618.01
North: 182556.1647 East : 1301723.7002
Line Course: N 89-25-23 W Length: 272.03
North: 182558.9038 East : 1301451.6840
Line Course: N 00-57-36 E Length: 618.01
North: 183176.8271 East : 1301462.0383
Line Course: S 89-25-23 E Length: 272.03
North: 183174.0879 East 1301734.0545
Perimeter: 1780.08 Area: 168,113 sq. ft. 3.859 acres
Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed
Error Closure: 0.0000
Error North: 0.00000
Precision 1: 1,780,080,000.00
courses, radii, and deltas)
Course: S 90-00-00 E
East: 0.00000
page 1
ject: 32614 Thu March 23 12:08:30 2006
Parcel Map Check
Parcel name: LOT 5E
North: 183408.0548
Line Course: N 89-25-23 W
North: 183409.6493
Line Course: S 00-34-37 W
North: 183177.1610
Line Course: S 89-25-23 E
North: 183175.5666
Line Course: N 00-34-37 E
North: 183408.0548
East: 1301589.5326
Length: 158.35
East : 1301431.1906
Length: 232.50
East : 1301428.8495
Length: 158.35
East : 1301587.1915
Length: 232.50
East : 1301589.5326
Perimeter: 781.70 Area: 36,817 sq. ft. 0.845 acres
Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed
Error Closure: 0.0000
courses, radii, and deltas)
Course: S 90-00-00 E
East: 0.00000 Error North: 0.00000
Precision 1: 781,700,000.00
page 1
BOEING REALTY CORP -BSP LOT 5
! ,ject: 32614 Thu March 23 12:08:00 2006
Parcel Map Check
Parcel name: LOT 7A
North: 183226.6152 East: 1301979.9234
Line Course: S 00-58-31 W Length: 356.01
North: 182870.6568
Line Course: N 89-25-23 W
North: 182873.1224
Line Course: N 00-57-36 E
North: 183229.0824
Line Course: S 89-25-23 E
North: 183226.6158
Length:
Length:
Length:
East
244.86
East
356.01
East
244.96
East
: 1301973.8637
: 1301729.0161
: 1301734.9809
: 1301979.9284
Perimeter: 1201.84 Area: 87,189 sq. ft. 2.002 acres
Mapcheck Closure -(Uses
Error Closure: 0.0051
Error North: 0.00060
Precision 1: 235,654.90
listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Course: N 83-18-19 E
East: 0.00508
page 1
BOEING REALTY CORP -BSP LOT 5
I j ect: 32614 Fri October 27 07:45:23 2006
Parcel Map Check
Parcel name: LOT 7B
North: 183763.0423 East : 13 02428.2669
Line Course: N 89-25-53 W Length: 327.85
North: 183766.2959 East : 1302100.4331
Curve Length: 43.00 Radius: 27.50
Delta: 89-35-36 Tangent: 27.31
Chord: 38.75 Course: S 45-46-19 W
Course In: S 00-34-07 W Course Out: N 89-01-29 W
RP North: 183738.7973 East : 1302100.1602
End North: 183739.2653 East : 1302072.6642
Line Course: S 00-58-31 W Length: 565.78
North: 183173.5673 East : 1302063.0340
Line Course: S 89-27-48 E Length: 376.44
North: 183170.0414 East : 1302439.4575
Line Course: N 01-06-10 E Length: 563.08
North: 183733.0171 East 1302450.2945
Line Course: N 88-53-50 W Length: 3.30
North: 183733.0806 East 1302446.9951
Ljne Course: N 01-06-10 E Length: 14.21
( North: 183747.2880 East 1302447.2686
Ll.ne Course: N 50-19-51 W Length: 24.68
North: 183763.0426 East 1302428.2713
Perimeter: 1918.35 Area: 223,199 sq. ft. 5.124 acres
Mapcheck Closure -(Uses
Error Closure: 0.0044
Error North: 0.00021
Precision 1: 435,986.36
listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Course: N 87-14-04 E
East: 0.00440
page 1
BOEING REALTY CORP -BSP LOT 5
i Jject: 32614 Fri October 27 07:45:20 2006
Parcel Map Check
Parcel name: LOT 7C
North: 183170.0400 East : 1302439.4567
Line Course: N 89-27-48 W Length: 376.44
North: 183173.5659 East : 1302063.0333
Line Course: S 00-58-31 W Length: 347.77
North: 182825.8463 East 1302057.1139
Line Course: S 89-27-48 E Length: 95.65
North: 182824.9504 East 1302152.7597
Line Course: N 01-06-10 E Length: 76.66
North: 182901.5962 East 1302154.2351
Line Course: S 89-27-48 E Length: 280.01
North: 182898.9735 East : 1302434.2328
Line Course: N 01-06-10 E Length: 271.12
North: 183170.0433 East 1302439.4507
Perimeter: 1447.65 Area: 109,311 sq. ft. 2.509 acres
Mapcheck Closure -(Uses
F-,or Closure: 0.0068
;rrorNorth: 0.00327
Precision 1: 212,889.71
listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Course: N 61-26-40 W
East: -0.00601
page 1
BOEING REALTY CORP -BSP LOT 5
,ject: 32614 Fri September 01 07:56:07 2006
Parcel Map Check
Parcel name: TRACT R
North: 183751.0653
Line Course: S 00-25-38 W
North: 183046.1749
Curve Length: 164.74
Delta: 17-38-36
Chord: 164.10
Course In: N 71-58-28 W
RP North: 183211.7259
End North: 183208.1569
Line Course: N 00-22-56 E
North: 183714.6257
Line Course: N 89-37-04 W
North: 183714.6926
Curve Length: 40.29
Delta: 48-35-44
Chord: 39. 09
Course In: N 87-12-17 W
RP North: 183717.0091
End North: 183751.0625
East: 1300773.9558
Length: 704.91
East: 1300768.6998
Radius: 535.00
Tangent: 83.03
Course: N 09-12-14 E
Course Out: S 89-37-04 E
East: 1300259.9583
East: 1300794.9464
Length: 506.48
East 1300798.3251
Length: 10. 04
East 1300788.2854
Radius: 47.50
Tangent: 21.44
Course: N 21-30-09 W
Course Out: N 44-11-59 E
East 1300740.8419
East: 1300773.9571
Perimeter: 1426.46 Area: 15,680 sq. ft. 0.360 acres
Mapcheck Closure -(Uses
Error Closure: 0.0030
Error North: -0.00279
Precision 1: 475,486.67
listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Course: S 23-41-34 E
East: 0.00122
Printed: 05-07-2007
Payment Made:
CITY OF RENTON
1055 S. Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Land Use Actions
RECEIPT
Permit#: LUA07 -048
05/07/200703:19 PM Receipt Number:
Total Payment: 1,500.00 Payee: BOEING
Current Payment Made to the Following Items:
Trans Account Code Description
5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat
5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval
Payments made for this receipt
Trans Method Description
Payment Check #023363
Account Balances
Trans Account Code Description
3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee
5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees
5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers
5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat
5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees
5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review
5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat
5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat
5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD
5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees
5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment
5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks
5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone
5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt
5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev
5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval
5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use or Fence Review
5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees
5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee
5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend
5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies
5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable)
5954 650.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits
5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage
5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax
Remaining Balance Due: $0.00
Amount
1,500.00
Amount
500.00
1,000.00
Balance Due
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
DEIIELOPME
CITY OF~~~~NtNG
MAY -72007
RECEIVED
R0702080