Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA-07-086_Report 01I- Z w ::2: a.. o ...J W > W Cl W (J u::: LL o ...J <C Z o i C/)f- C/)w W~z LLf-O O(f)f-a: C) a....cz +-- ::::o.f'-I >1'0(f) W « -I> >f-> f II !!I~ ill. >-=:l • Wo z ...J(f)2 ...Jxz <Cxw >-.;;to:: SSOB6 N019NIHS'tM 'NOIN3tl 133~lS HlL£ Hinos XXv ~ ~d013A3a 301~~O lVNOISS~O!Jd M31A A311V A ~ I w , ~ Ii 1 ~ 0 ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~w~ ww ,I-, ~w Ii tow to. 000 , ,00 I r I z I qll £S086 N01:JNIHSVM 'NOIN3~ w ~ ~ !i] 13]~lS H!L£ Hlnos XXV ~ ~ ~ ~ Ie ~ 0 it lN3~d013A30 301~~O ~ o:t 0; .. w~ ~ ~< N ,D !;l·~ I oil":' t; OJ-;, lVNOISS~OIld M3JA A311V A ~t::w !o ~g:(§ ~c.. iii: h t ~wo ~ 2 I SS086 N01:::>NIHSYM 'NOIN31:l w " C! , !I~ Ii] 1331:11S HIL£ Hinos XXv • ~ ~ g ~ .LN3~d013113a 301~~O I~~ i~ Il lVNOISS3~O!ld M3111 A311V II " ;;;!S~ Ii ~o , *~~ .' , , ;. ;~ • ~ ~ , if~ ~ " , i~~ ., Ii ~i i~ ,. , .. , 11; ;~ ~ ~ " ~ ~, i ;,~ '. ., ! ~ ~ , !~t 1· " £~ , ,. '" " ~f~ • ~ ::~ \1;~~ . ., I' .,~ , . ! , ~; !d' ,! " . ! , ,-'H~i .! " 'I' , ~~ i , j " ~!'l~ ~~ ~ !' " " ~ p'~ \I. i -, ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ [ ~ ~ , ~ ~~ ~n~ ~~ ~! ~ ~~ nHs B; i , 'i' " t! , ~ 6 i ~i ~;: ~y ; g~~ j' . , ~~! ,I ~~h~ 'j' I" ~!I ", ~~~ ~ .0001··" rn 01.1 .. , " rt~i "1 'I !l, i, ~ if F.h:g-" ~i~ I; , " ~~ , H~ ~5~ " ~ g~~~ " •. ,I, I I:.,j !~ ~ ~., C;C;OB6 NOl~N1HS\fM 'NOlN]~ 13]~lS H1L£ Hlnos XXV !N3V1d013113C 301.,j,j() 1"'NOISS3~O!,jd M3111 A311 ... II • w , g Ul~~ ~iijo i ~ 0 , ! w ~ ~~ ! c" ~~i 1,1\ lU t;,~~ fI .. ~~ :1 I I , , , • i • ~ , i ; s #-# iii '" 0 I 0 !i] ~ ci ~ 0 " !UJ II I II Ii ;"1 ,I i!g "I' p ~'!I ill @w !~ SSOB6 NOIQNJHSVM 'NOIN3~ 133~IS HIL£ Hinos xx. lN3I'IId013A30 30i.,j,j() 'VNOISS3~Ot,ld M31A A311V A o II " II"] ~ T"" I ... 0 II IU) Ii -$S onu. .... • .i ! I, j, , " 100 , ~ ~ z z I S<;096 NOlaNIHS'V'M 'NOIN]~ w w ~ , c , Ii I 133~lS HIL£ Hinos XXi> " ~ .~ IS ~ ~ ~N3~d013A30 3~~~O 3 !~wiil3 .. 0 w ;.);:!: lVNOISS3~Ol:!d M31A A311V A ,~~ i;;z .... ilj iU) II Boo C ,0 iwii5oo.. , ! : , •• :.~ I, : ------------------- q! !I tl~ I"U II . NnhJll! I II --to , ~ Ii" g • ! ~ i ~. I" -i L .11",1 30'1't1!;10l00--'} ~'H' • ii~ ! ! I ,ii iii I 'CI I " iii j,. ~~~ n, ~, , ~, . , .zI1Q-•• ~" f i I • 0 z ~ ~ <. ~, i i w ~f ~~ o· " ~ w " ~~ ". O. !;;<';09S NOlnNIHSVM 'NOIN3~ 133~lS HlL£ Hinos XXv .LN3V'1d013113Q 3::>1~~O l'o'NOISS3~O!ld M3I11 A311V II ~ "I il ! I, .i , , . ,,! w. !i II § f i c .. .• , ~ ~ m I ~ :,'1] g " .0 II ! (/) II i f H ~ u z 0 u !L hi!! r. " e. <,;<,;086 N01~N1HS'v'M 'NOIN]~ 13]~lS HIL£ Hinos XXv lN3l"ld013A3C 3::>1~~O lVNOISS3~Ol:jd M31A A311V A j! ~~ !' , Ih ji g '! ol~ ; L .. ., i'~ '~ K' 'i: I i. ." j~ .~' :g '; < ! I. . r.~ ___ ~ '---'~ r' ",~~ " " I' " . \ I, 1" I 1" I ' " " , : ,x,: : )(, : " , , " , ' /\ I i /\ I " " I, ,I , " I, ,I ~---~ ~---; , ~---~ ~---. ' I[ II II .r,O~ .... .01 ,"'.~t k~ ~ I I II ~ 8 8 ~ • T , , i: • , , I ~i • -, k.' I ;;; 1,'1] ~ .0 100 Ii § " • 51 il -fl w II § I ffi ~ I ~ I ~~ I i5~ I i . I ! I I I i I I I I i LI .: i ~-"f II ~I I II i !i §i II II z- ~ w ~ ~ w ~ A w, ~; ~. ~> -' o· SSOB6 NOI~N'HSVM 'NOIN]~ I; I w ~ ~ • ~ a:a i'] 133~IS H1L£ HlnOS xxv • ~ S '<t 0 .11) O-II .lN3Wd0131130 3::>(.,I~O • ~~od~~ , 0 ~~~ oil;!: N " lVNOISS~Ol:ld M3111 A311V II illO~ ~ !OJ 'I ~c ,0 i\iuv> w • , • , , i I ql.! I'll .. ". " d .. J:~' . I'l'~! I I i ;" , SSD86 NOWNIH$VM 'N01N]~ 133~HS HlL£ Hinos XXv 1~d013A3a 301~~O l\1NOISS3~O~d M3IA "311\1 A I! s . ~ I,·] , ~ I N . ....1 IJ ! Ii ~ IHHH~HnH IHli ~iH !i!! I 'IIIIIIIIIIIIII! j 111111' ! li!1 II!IIIIII j I II ~ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!IIII ~ IIIIII1I1I1 ~ III1IIII ~ Ii --"--:"~~~ --------------~--------------------------------~ I ! .~~ ;;086 NOI0NIHSVM 'NOIN3~ ffi 0" . I , , ,; , • , J ~ z ~ ~ g ~ is :;. ~ w " is • " - • I of" .i\'\: 133~lS HIL£ Hinos XXV ~. ,... o. il] ;ol~' 'JII ~d013A3a 301±lO 9 ~! ~IU ~ 0 I : m~ ! {b 'VNOISS3,lOlld M3IA A311V A ~~ ~ is I ~~ ! U II 133HS 1::13AOO , , . , , , ;--------, , ;1 • I ~ ~ S _~1I4'V "J,j ......,."'.q ~ ,o.a._~ NOl.Nffil B 1I0AlT;) . . IIII HH ~ ~ ~ ~ " , , / , , ! d a , ! i!I~1 ~ . ~ !ilili. ~ " '!<'f l ~ ,Ill Ii / , II , , / , , I "".," 1 'I! i I. ji ! I 1 I , , Ii! ;1 ,1 , , . ~ ~ ~ ", 'I, ,! i' ~ I ~~ :,I i i i' II illiP :f Iii I I' ,i I i~ ! i Ii ! I' ,{ ! I! Ii i ~I ' I'" , ! I' ; i' '!! I, i! ,Ii d'l ! II 0 11'1' I' 'I Iii .I,i ;: I!i Iii Iii 1"1 !lii "II" !! II .,111 I ,I; ,I. ~ 6: II' il1'I I ! II ! '. . I ~ !. :!i I l. • ~ , ii' vi~ ~ ~p; ! !. Il'l"! /"!'I' ~! t·, . i '! ~, i I ! 1" r i"' 1'1 nil h ~n r i h ~ , ~ i ~ ! i! II j !I-I. i I ' unl~ -I~I I'l-~~10:J~~"~O:'lJElj~ ~lilnH I ~~~ 1'I~!i ! ;Ii ,I,; ~ I ,=::7 , --ll-VO AB NOISI':l~ .. .== • ,; '" ~ , • ~ ~ g ~ ~ :; ~ ~ 7 ~ , , :; !!,j ~~a:'l' ~~ ,'00 i!3>! ssaS6 NOIONIHSVM 'NOIN3~ 133~lS H1L£ HLOOS XX • .L~d013113Q 3:)\,j~O lVNOISS~Ol:ld M3111 A311V II ! dd nh I \ I !@®®®OO ! ! IIII HH / / SSOS6 NOiDNIHSVM 'NOiN3~ 133~lS HiL£ Hinos xx. 1.~d013A3a 3O[,j~O 1'INOISS3~Olld M3IA A3TlV A I III HH , ,; , ..; II "' .. .., ........... < ~ .! ~1I1 • ~ ~Ii " ~ .: g :1 • ;; " • • ;; " !I; !'II -,,1' ,I ~~ ei fI~ ;!!lll' 1'1" r !!" §I!I :ij~ ""'I I' ~;~~ "I!i 'll~'Is "d'iii! I , • . : SS086 NOl~NIHS'<1M 'NOlN]~ l]]~lS HlL£ Hinos XXV lN~d013"3a 301~~O lVNOISS3~Olld M31" A311V" '" ~ ~ W Q < W '" ~ J: ~ ~ ~ , 3: I w H l:~ ,(7, , II II !. Ii ,. ii ! ! , , IIII J Ii J l w ! ~ 3: '" '" ... 'I '" I, ~, Ii !O I -> I' '" II < '" ~! 0 .. " ... " 0 SS096 NOIDNIHS'v'M 'NOIN3M z I!] w ~w 133~lS HlL, HlnOS XX, ~ g~i~~ ~ ~ II lN3I"ld013A30 3:)1"I,j() 0 N I~~ it) " lVNOISS3~O!jd M3IA A311V A , jift!)co.. II .00 0 ~ 'i • i ! 111I!i I ~~ ~~ ! II ill' .s::. <\;'" I I t'i .. ;E ''1~i I I I I . ~ , 1~0Ii t~~ 'hi i • Uil~ ; I ill ;"':i l , I,' I Iii !II! Ii' i ',:II! • § "j! ! ! • o. ~. I ~,,~~~ r I ... l .. 1 i!1 !'I; I . • • 'lilli, loll!' HH ,. ... ~... I :1 :h~ i o. >< -li I Ijj! ~ II! h!1 ~!=:idf jl Ii ~ -~ "-CD.lS I , ~I j !Ii i~!' 0, , ; h!l~!di ,Ill Ii ~~ --1 I , " ,!. r j "'" ::~ ,,~ ",n III! I· i~~ i!l~~ • III"il l :' -, h ~ ~ J ~ b~§~ ,II II!!'" ! ,II + de •• b .. I'd :z C I II ,iH! ............ ~ ~ ~ ~ I' ~ = = I "' ! ,.. ii il i' ,"" Ii 2-: , I ~ ~. "I s • • , ;i J " 0 • ~ ~ g ~ ~ / ~ ~ -" / ~ '.' ';:5'~ 1 ~ft~~'Z...,o;;--- -__ --__ . I, (.so)>!.I!lON --~ ---• I 1\ " • J • ~ i H~= i----J\ \ ~\ I *" .... . , , ~ ~!;. ~ g , "'''''''''] '\ .. - ~ ~ :; .. -'\ --!~': i ~5;; Ii " " " " ~ I .n. I o. ... :; ~ ! h! "" : ;: ! -- I I !In . 5~" ! lIu !. • • >SOBS N01DNIHSVM 'N01N3" 133"15 H1L£ Hlnos XX, J.N3Vjd013113C 3:)1,,1,10 1VN01SS3"l01:ld M3II\ A3T1V II • [-I'll-! ! -~---M--! ------ • • , , \ , , \ , , \ , '. -1\'1-1 , ------~ , , \ \\,LI -----\\I- \ ' I . \\ I \ I -m--! \/ ) I -,,// I "" -, -• I !i\ --: II'] , N , o .. U 11 I II I II I AlAI fl'\ , , , " ., , , !I~ ,CD ":E '> ~ lEi''!, .. I~ :! o z Pit c> 11 11, ' " \I~ lillii ". . i~ 1111< i'l~! I' 'ill'" I' IIIII! id. :i !!.~:lil.I!llii E I!'II ... ,.· ..• 1 ijiU; I ~,.. .. :" ~ __ HH a ~ 1m g lin ~ m.1 ~ ,~ 1m ~ ~ 1m i'tTl' 1m I!~! ~ 'I'I~: ~J II • .~ I~ l' ,!! i' . <, r i' -< _ ~~ Ill"1 ~t;;.~~o; " ~: rtr r~,::~ ~ 5:~ 'f ~;"'" €~ " , '"!"I"~ r i!;~;;';'Ii~;::; ii ~[;: J '(:: ~ liJ;ll:: 11'" !jlC )( I f .... J I ar m I 11- ; iii .. I iJ .. 1 !§: n I .. h:r I , [ 11 01 II N I ~ Ii, ~ 'I N I ~ ~ ~.~ nn IIII OQj!!I~' ~~d ~, ~OZ~ ~ .. rZG) ~ "~ . o ~~I I I ~ I -j r" '\ ( ••.•.. j . :;:. I .f: ,'-' ~ f. ~,:, ~:::J: (~ I l i;;;" , INi ~ ~~~.; "'I , " , , , 'm x . ~ ! Iii o Ill! !!I I ~ )I 11" 'I~ : Iii ~ II.li j'j I; :1 1 I~ II: "l'lllllll) ,i !Ili l!!: ,1,1.,., ii !Ii :Ij I ~ II!I III I' 'Iii ,-j I jill IIi ~ III ill ~ ilii Ii! I il! ~ I !Ii, n~ l' i lPli " "I I i , I!~ .~.. ~ I • ! i • I I I i i II c. 'I Ii -, I 'I il i /0 , ~ ~ ~ I' ~ u...... I~ I III ill ,.11 -I I!i 3 iiS ~ 11\ :E ~ ~ ,. l~ 1= ' .. ."C'··'--i! i .. ! • , ,_ 1 .. ·····"'1 : I , !-I i ~ I VALLEY VIEW PROFESSIONAL OFACE DEVELOPMENT 4XX SOUTH 37TH STREET RENTON. WASHINGTON 98055 • ! ~~iml ~ ill • , " " L !i II ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ I < > z I "1 ;= z w ~ w 0 "'''[1'::-- SSOB6 N01~NIHSVM 'N01N]~ 133~lS HIL£ HInes XXv .LN3VId013113C 30l±lO lVNOISS3,jOl:ld M~II A31lV II I-! j j, ~i !,. ffi ~ 0 ~ m~~ ~o "1 w ~ h~ 0 • F~ 0 , ~o ~ I I I I II U ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ w c ~ ~ 0 z ~ w ~ " > ~ '" ~ ,., r9 I! i ,:) !I~ 'i !f' _,~ :"' J ~~. ~ ,Ii I) , I ! 1111 ,1;11, '" ~rl I· 'I "', •• ' .: ~"--" "1';, .'i> ~', '" .-, h ,',';" .... , 1r ,".' "'l II -j *"' ~ I 0 C"l II] ~ N EO " II , , I .c I~~ ! u ii3.~ ; .. f! ! ... g~ : -ll I CII..Iij • • ~a I )( i"7:! ..• !t i , . !I !~ ~ ~ C ;-, --. ., z -0 .-; ;= < :.~. ::l ~ , ~ w I~l : ~I;r U , , I , 10k , ,', '" ~ 0 .'.;: !:1 , I , -( .' . ~ .. : . .. ffi:'l '. I < I " ~,. 'I ~ II. .. " , I I .~:, II jllj C /. , lig, '" i , I ,; • " ~ z ~ ,; ~ g g ~ · :0- ~ I' ~ · , ~ • 1 ~. L ~I ! • >SOB6 N01~NIHSVM 'N01N3~ 133~lS HIL£ Hlnos XXt J.N3\'jd013A30 301~O 1VNOISS3~Ol:ld M31A A311 ... A -I ". " • 1111 HH ~; i~ i~: r::::.f""~.".,.~o··o.-~~)l;J;~--~~~~-;;;.---____________ J, {<Ii)fIlllO~ , , ,rb;; .. ~-_ t ' H - .. --_. -\.~::----:"T'"': -'I c.~_-.l'---._ .. -! ... - ~-==.~..::_o:.:=.:=--..::' =-~~%:.-..:::..--- ~~~'i!. ~ -~ ~ ... --.. _ ....... .. _ ~-c.o_ ~--"''''''''----~ .......... ~~r ...... =~~':.= e-::;:--:::" .. -=== STANDARD SIDE SEWER INSTAUATION ,,. SE 1/. or THE S[ I;" or SECT. 3D, lWP. 23 N .. RGE. 5 E., '111.101. ----~~~~:r~~ t~_. __ ._ ; ~~~{:-~;;- ~, t.:;~· . =~ ....!'! 100 -... . --. --.~.,. • _. ___ . w-;;'./'d,· . .,. .--.--..... ~ .• • • __ .-..... :;:0:.;.':":,',-=:'-- :":''::''~='='=::''':''!':'~'':!.-. .=._----... ,~€OC~~;··· ;<.r~--E)C~ CN' "'-1/" ~~ T ... ...., ~:..~~¥z~=-' ~",.,..- ~ .. _- :i!"":>\==--:.,~ .... - :==:~ .~;.m -i-t'M ' .-----.. •• f .... _ -... ._----.... -_':.! ......... $"6' ...... =.=-.... -= ~.;---J! 'Ui~~'r>::..;;z.,..,... ~1L ""14" ::l"''':~~-r.'"'- ~-==-~ --.... 8' OR 8' ~,~EAN OUT CONCRETE BLOCKING SIZING PROCEDURE ". BfC!!O'ft'OfD FOB ,yp!!OyN ... ----... ----... ----... ---- Q.; ------... exeltech ""2rd~ .. s..""'~_.'MI(If -..: (2OG~IZJ._ '''''' (200~1211l5!o8 Propel No: D71Il-OIO .. "' __ ... ..-_ •• __ M ~ ~ -' ~ .... ~:g u.; ~tj~ U) 5! e: C) !tIo..(f)Z Oo:r::2 a:...Jl-t!I a. Wr--Z >"'-~~:t:~ W ~'" >W::::>~ 0° >-I'L"'Z LLjli:xO :::lOX ..... < "<t i3 > ~ ~ ~re 07-16-07 ~~ UTllmES DETAILS 0720 SHEET; C3.1 --=:==.0:;-'_ ~ !!rn:l.~..:r:of',:""=..- tl; ,,~ .. _--------~---.. ~- :;::;]E;..=.::rs:!-r- Htr.r......,., .... __ ..... _ ...... ...,.... .. """""'"... lii!!/, --":':.- ~ =-== DOMESTIC AND IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE DETAIL ~ SI; 1/4 or THE SI; 1/4 or SECT. 30. TWP. 23 N.. RGE. 5 1; •• W ..... J r= ~ --J. ·;;:.~:--..-·itlf ';;~~"lii 'II II •• • =r-..:.:.. "'=-=--....... _ ~.ia~~:";~1i.~~ =~·=:o,':r..1~· .. ~:~-::-:-:.=.~ a~~,.;~:.~:-::= ~~='.:-::= ------._----...... _--- ~ --V ... -- DETECTOR DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY ~" ~-...... ~-':.."'=,- ~~:;...""'!"~- (r -~~"'~ ... Il~X----- ,---=--=-=";:;.... =.~";:~-..:h""-...... "--. ..".."'''''"'''''''' ... ... ~-... ~ ..... - ~ --- WATER CONNECTION DETAIL WET-TAP EXIST. WATER MAIN ~ RECOMNEHDEO FOR APPAOVAL .. ..._--.. ----.. ----.. ... _-- e.,. ~ --... exeltech 0(FI2rod .... s..SioIIo~_ ..... OO -." (200)=-r"" (2DII~_ Pn:>joo\ N", (J1N-0III ~="'1SF .. ----I{ ..J gj:;;~ _ wOO ~ ~Ol ~ "'z OO:r:~ 0: ~..J"''' 0.. "z Coo'" ... < ~w"" ~:O'" ",-_51 . ~ u. z ~ t5X~ ~ ~~ > '" ~ SITE DEVELOPMENT 0Are: ,..,.., SHEETTITI.E: DETAILS 0720 -, C3.2 -:=:=. .... - ------------------------------------------ I , l , , IJ.. , , , , , , 'n." " • I I i .. ...-:r I , , • I , 'l , , , , , " , flBl , , .. ,'," .•• <1-~ I , , ~ l ------, h i , " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " , , , , ';".,\ ", , • I " ( ""-of'" ,,",,·r ... _t"100z) ' .. , -.u(o:<)_ "" ............... _M ... 4:J8l18xe ,-,.~ ~ l , , ,~ , , , • 1 ~ , , ~ -0/1 !!il • • · tnl iii "; ". SSO!6 NOlDNIHS¥M 'NOINli IllilS HILt Hinos XX, jNl~dOllAla lJIJJO lVNOISSlJOHd MllA AlllVA , , ,f'u ('''" ~ • , , I , '7 !!] U) ,I > " i II • . M I ----- 'I ....... J'. '\ • I ~. 'I -. t ~ i I ! ; r L ''''..... ,.,>0('" ....... '\IO!l _, _Tn1a)_ .'B ...... ' ... ,.. __ ".". • II ,/ -j t II ----b .~~ .11 " lk (~ z :s ~ z :s ~ ~ a: ~ ~~ « \SOB6 NOWNIHSVM 'NOINli llms HIL> Hinos XXI jNl~dOllAlO lJIJJO lVNOISSlJO~d MllA AlllVA ~I; i " I , . iii. ... .. tf..\-I .b, -- " • , t ":l I'l (J) ,I > " , II' ! ~ a: ~ :::E :0 ~ '" z 0 ) >= ~~ ..., J L • " H ",,-II!'" ·,"".r ... .... ' .. 1l\1li ............ (0011_ .. ' .... _ .. __ 0<4 ... 1.I'8118xe ~ 11096 NOlDNIHS~M 'NOINli milS Hll£ Hinos xx, JN1~dOllA10 l~IJJO lVNOISS1JOMd MllA Al1m 'II! I !! 'OOi' ," , I~. ! I ! I I § I ~, , . . , "I' I.~ .1 Ii 1I I ~I I i :, ~I ! i d ., i' .~ i, Ii i~ ~! I , • -:1 ;,! i I II •• Ii I. Ii ~! I I • ~I 01 • SS086 N01~NIHSVM 'NeIN3~ I33~IS HIL£ HInes XXt .1N3nd013A3CI 3OWO "MIQISS3,j()1!d M3A A3'T1V 1\ , i ~e I ~ ~ Ii] -~ ~ . f"~ " a 0" ~ i UJ " -w~ II !~w .we 'Iii h.1 I , I I I"~' I~. ! fifiOB6 N01!>NIHS'tfM 'N01N3M i33~lS HiL' Hines xx • .LN3I"ld013J\30 301±10 1VNOISS3,j()Ijd M3,. A3T1Y,. I :: ii] w " ! 'I r-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- £'S096 NOlDNIHS'V'M 'NOIN3~ 133~lS H1L£ Hinos XXV ~d013A3a 3O~~O l\INOISS3~Ol:ld M31A A3llV A -N81S30 A~\fNIVlJll3~d 0-- 0-- 0-- 0-- 0-- ,,096 N01~NIHSVM 'N01N]~ 133MlS HIL£ HInes XXv .LN3I"4d013A30 3:)1~~O lVNOISS3~OIld M3IA A311VA I ~ "] s . II ~ ~ , C\j .« II I II NOI1:)n~lSNO:) ~O:llON -N81S30 AHv'NIVIIIl3~d • -r---o - I ; I I ~ I I I I I --L--~-L ~-L I I I I I I I I I --or----y--y- I ! I I I i I -L~--l------lJ I I I I • ~ " , , 'I~ ·n "0 'z I o § ~ ~ h·I!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1I1I!11111"--0 -=""'4== i If" -r--rr---0 I i I I I ~ I -~--~----!.-- I I I --0 'L " ~I ifill'l! J"",,,,--"" 1 ! I i I ! I I I -1--1----or-- I I I I -l-~j-~ I I I I \ / ./ --0 --0 --0 PRELIMINARY DESIGN. -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ['I I n ! 0 1 O/JI~ , 'T" »~ ~8 ... -;-Ill' ~~Iii V ALLEY VIEW PROFESSIONAL M Ii;!; " ~ j ~ I': OFACE DEVELOPMENT ltfj. iln u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4XX SOUTH 37TH STREET 'I ~ RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 I m z " I' I' 1--i I III ----0 ; • • , 'liS i :'::1 q;!;1 i ~i ~I ~, I I ---0 :1111111,111 ! i I i I I I i i I I i I I I I I I I --l- I I I I i I I I 'I~ I i ~ I ~I ~I ~: i I PREll MINAR DESIGN -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION [Ii ):.1 " -f· !i 6 I il I ~~ll o~1 !:2m' ~ ~ r'11" ~"' ~ -oJ; b ~;ll .... , w O"'~ I~ ~ V ALLEY VIEW PROFESSIONAL OFACE DEVELOPMENT 4XX SOUTH 37TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 ----0 I ilI!J!i ill -! '1 1 1 ; , • , , 'I~ ,m ~:!l I , , ! 'I~ ,~ ~~ 'm i ,-\-----tJ;I L __ +==Ivt;;;;;;;1 PRELIMINARY DESIGN -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Ii I ! [ II »·1" I, w ' I' !::l 'I -a. I ~~~ 1.1 o! .-I1lQ~ "7""" 0:;;1113 -Cl:::!~~ %: ~" ~ o£:!~ ~ii1ro 5 ~ VALLEY VIEW PROFESSIONAL OFACE DEVELOPMENT 4XX SOUTH 37TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 fi g!. !;j ~! !i 'I '"iiI I ~; ,! lll'J '!~ 1 i I [Ii il • , • • 00 110 ::!!~ o~ mm 6~ N;o '~i 0 0 'I §Z); ~ m r 11 ! ~OZ0!l! i! o oo~ ~~§B ~ ~ ~~. ~ r-*fil~ f " ~ 0 "0,, ... , I ~ 8 m 0 ~ 167 HVVy /// / /. //000000/ /////// / / / / / ////////////./// ' , , , / / / / / / / // // // // /. / / '/. ~~ -; m ~~ V ALLEY VIEW PROFESSIONAL OFACE DEVELOPMENT 4XX SOUTH 37TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 ;0/ m en -o .n--o,_m ""~~Z, i ~I!!! ! .t ~ ~"i ./1 I -; -»: r N o Z m • en w > « ~ () ::J I- I-« I en • SSOB6 NOlDNIHSVM 'NOIN3~ 133~lS HlL£ Hinos xxv .LN3I'IdOl3A3C 301±10 lVN01SS3,lO~d M31A A311 ... A O'VOCIIO • I Ii] " II ~ ~ ?i ~ w ~ 6 ~ c ~ 0 , . , I: , II I ! [ii ~I ~ II ' $ -~~ > -.-- --.... ,' •• ' -,":.,..' • /' -~"~-' .. ~ ~ m ~ ~ (j) I ~' » -i ~.··,"~~;i -i l' ~ i~ .: E -~ i ! • " ~, , i I • ALBOT ROAD ~8!IOII o~i ;;1r~ ~ .. ~;;1' ~O! 1: r ~~ •• -.j 16 ~ VAU£Y VIEW PROFESSIONAL OFACE DEVELOPMENT 4XX SOUTH 37TH STREET RENTON. WASHINGTON 98055 c () '" " A ciJ » < m VJ -H (j) • ! • 11"!11 • ~U,,! i~IOj .!I I , ; • , I [ ,I " Ii i' ! ,-- I I I I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I ! I I , I 0 I , I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'liS I ~ ~ I l~1 i ~ I ~I ~I ~I ~I ~I gl I~ : ZI I I I DESIGN -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ~ mme II ' rx~ ~ ~ ~ ~~o, -ie!;:l;J;; ~~!;l. w ow! i~ ~ VALLEY VEW PROFESSIONAL OFACE DEVELOPMENT 4XX SOUTH 37TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 il!U 1i i!d r 'I~ '0 ~-I I Z 11~ 'm I • • , PRELIMINARY DESIGN -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION [Ii i ~ n ~ ~ il plE~ ~ ~mo! ~~~-. :2;;00 0 ! ~~~ ~ 0 ~ ~ m ~ VALLEY VIEW PROFESSIONAL OFFICE DEVELOPMENT 4XX SOUTH 37TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 ~!' !.~ .~, ~e ~i il ;;!S! ... ~fiJ '::!I ~11"j .!I J ,-~ ... • EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM December 11, 2009 Carrie Olson, Engineering Specialist -CED I." Cindy Moya, Records Management Specialist r'/~~\ . V Returned Recorded Documents: Bill of Sale -#20090728000340 (Valley View Professional Development, LLC. -LUA-07-086) The attached document has been recorded with King County and is being returned to you. Please forward copies to parties of interest. The original will be retained by the City Clerk's Office. Thank you. Attachment cc: LUA-07-086 h:lcityclerklrecords specialist\correspondence & memos -cindy\recorded documents\bill of sale -olson. doc . -.. -'. Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, W A 98055 • • BILL OF SALE! Proj Name: VAt..t..E:y' VI EW f'lZcf-Property Tax Parcel Numbe .. : 3"'2~,* III 09 Project File #: ~,;1 0105 Street Intersection: 1. '~O"oI .:::..-r Address: 3"0 -f :{q 0">1 C-, Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on page __ . Grantor{s): Grantee{s): . 1. VA.1..\.fH \/IE'W 1"~.:ft:i5"""Al.. PI:~ft1M u.. 01. City of Renton, a Municipal CorporatIon 2. . The Grantor, as named above, for, and'in consideration of mutual benefits, hereby grantS; bargains, seIls and delivers to the Grantee, as named above, the fonowing described personal property: WATER SYSTEM: ~ Size ~. U}-'5,/-54 10 L.F. of G:, " (...1 Water Main ~4 L.F. of ¥::2 " c;..i Water Main L.F. of " WatjMain . I each of t-, " Gate Valve, ( f I" ~ each of C, " Gate Valves I each of Fire Hydrant Assemblies SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: !&ru@ Size ~ L.F. of " Sewer Main L.F. of " Sewer Main L.F. of " Sewer Main each of " Diameter Manholes each of " Diameter Manholes each of " Lift Stations STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: !&ru@ Size ~ L.F. of " Stonn Main L.F. of " Storm Main L.F. of " Storm Main erlc:h of " Storm Inlet/Outlet ea'.:;h of " Storm Catch Basin each of " Manhole STREET IMPROVMENTS: (Including Curb, Gutter, Side~al~, Asphalt Pavement) Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk L.F. Asphalt Pavement: .SY I?r L. F. of Width STREET LIGHTING: # of Poles ;)..oCA -oo!./-3 By this conveyance, Grantor will warrant and defend Ihc sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons. whomsoever. lawfully claiming or to claim the same, This conveyance shall bind the heirs executors, administrators alld assigns fore,:er. O:\Fonns\PBPW\BILLSALE2.DOC\bh Page I • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Grantor has caused this instrument to be executed this £! day of ~ 20s;iJ /f~C/L-, INDIVIDUAL FOR,U OFACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and ?cknowledged -it to be hislher/their free and voluntary acf for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) My appointment expires: Dated: REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF ACKNOW/.EDGMENT Notary Seal~~ffillithin box STATE OF WASHINGTON) 88 "", "I COUNTY OF KING ) ,,, "THO I" ~" \.. ".,~ '/ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ~ "",,'\\\\\11111 0 1,1. ].,(..'L Ckv\",o"" .... 4.tA. =-~.\ON t ... ~ ~ ~ signed this instrument, on oath -~ III. ~ = i.lJ:II O,AIfJo ~ " stated that helshe/they w;:tere ~torized to execute the instrument and :0:)$0" -~ ~ acknowledged it as the -e """"""'-L" _ and (; . ~u .. ... ~ Z ~ of V .. I t.., Vn....-('>0+, ~.~ ee ihe fre<jand volb~~ act of such ... (.I::" -\ A"I"''' § ~ : ~~thl.~:~7i;::::;::d in the instrument. <.fI~ '1";)-- .A "'" 2.26-_~ " = At 'II ~... -;:; -"'<:-hlm~\"\'''' y...'\ -.~- 1'"'Ir:-\II.'~S ~ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) rs e.+\ 't J,.. _ ~ ..... S "" Myappointmen,expires: ;l. ~'& 113 Dated: t> o..d O'f CORPORA TE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON) S8 COUNTY OF KING ) On this ___ day of . 20-, before me personally appeared to me known to he of the corporation that executed the within instrument. and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (print) My appointment expires: Dated: O:IFo""sIPBPWlBILLSALE2.DOC\bh Page 2 • Return Addre$s: Nelsdn Law Group PLLC 600 Stewart Street, suite 100 Sea.ttI~, WA Q13101 NATIVE TRAIL EASEMENT COVER SHEET Document Title: NativeTraii Easement Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: NfA Grantor; Valley View Professional D~velopment LLC Grantee: The City of Renton Abbreviated Legal Description: A portidn of Lot 4; city of Renton East Valley Medical Park, Short Plat recorded August 15, 1978: under Recording No. 7808151009, being a portion df the Southeast quarter of Sectidn.30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington. See page 4 of this document for fuillegal description. Assessor's Prope.rty Tax Parcel Number: 3023059111 • • TRAil EAsEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of this J1.!.'Bay of &'fZ.vA1't '( , 2008 by and between Valley View Professional Development LLC (the "Grantor") and the City of Renton, a municipal corporation ofthe State of Washington (the "Grantee"). Recitals WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of the real property ("Property"), the full legal description of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, Grantor wishes to grailt a non-exclusive easement for public trail u!!age ("Trail Easemenf') upon and across the Property as described in Exhibit A and further shown by the map and tables attached hereto <is Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, Grantee wishes to accept the Trail Easement for the purpose of creating and maintaining a hon-motorized public trail. NOW THEREFORE, to provide for the conveyance of the Trail Easement herein described, the parties agree as fOllows: 1. Grant of Easement. Grantor, for and in consideration of mutual benefits, conveys and grants.to Grantee and the public a perpetual, non-exclusive non-motorized Trail easement over, across, along, in, upon and under the easement area upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 2. No Obstruction. Grantee and Grantor covenant that no structure or obstruction, including fences, shall be erected over, upon or within the Trail Easement, and no trees, bushes or other shrubbery shall be planted in the area of ground for which the Trail EaSement in favor of Grantee aild the public has been provided herein. 3. Easement Construction, Repair and Maintenance, GranteeshaiJ have the right, but not the obligation, at Grantee's own expense, to construct a pedestrianttail within the boundaries of the Trail Easement. Grantee shall be responsible for all costs related to the repair and maintenance of the Trail Easement, and shall have the right to enter the easement area at any time to maintain the same. Grantee's responsibilities under this paragraph shall become effective upon commencement of the Trail Easemenfs construction, and shall remain in effect for the Trail Easement's duration. 4: ,Covenant Running with the Land. This easement and the, covenants herein shall be covenants running with the land and shall be binding on the successors, neirs and assigns of both parties hereto. 5: ~ Grantor warrants that the Grantor has good title to the above property and warrants the Grantee title to and quiet enjoyment of the easement conveyed hereto. 2 --_._---- • .2008 Grantor: Valley View Professional Development LLC By:1iq<' &L- I Its: H1: H 16 'lz... STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) 55. COUNTY OF KING ) • . On this l"t.j.l....day of:H.bV"I.\A. ... 'f. 2008. before me personally appeared 'R.~\!-c.h.. .. 6.""ta.y. the individual who executed the within and foregoing instrument. and acknowledged the said instrument to be a' free' and voluntary act and deed tor the use and purposes therein mentioned. and on oath stated ,that he/she is authorized to execute the said instrument Given under my hand and official sealoli the day and year first a/lovewritten, -, NOTARY UBLIC In and torthe State of WaShington. residing at I<A-..:l w Print Name: .-,'""e.""-'=.t..!.l~c;.' !-'L=-<., --'='~'=7"",,"---­ My commission expires _-==~1..-__ 3 • EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF NATNE TRAJLEASEMENr ACROSS TAX LOT NUMBER 3023059111 ORBXOOOI FEBRUARY 19, 2008 • A .15 FOOT WIDE TRAIL EASEMENT WITIilNTHAT .PORTION OF LOT 4, EAST VALLEY MEDICAL PARK SHORT PLAT, FILED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7808151009, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRlBED LINE: . . BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE SOUTH 82'26'25" EAST 11.07 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE 01' SAID LOT 4; THENCE SOUTH 30'30'47" EAST 67.13 FEET; 'fRENCE SOUTH 61 ~51 '56" EAST 6.80 FEET; . THENCE SOUTH 49'47'00" EAST 71.63 FEET TO 'fi:m BEGINNING OF A ctJRVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE PASSING THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22'07'20" A DISTANCE QF 38.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27'39'40" EAST 46.89 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 33'22'14" EAST 16.05 FEET; THENCE NORTH 84'4S'29"EAST i6.02FEET TO THEBEGlNNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG TIlE ARC OF SAID ctJRVE PASSING THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25"26'09" A DISTANCE OF 44.39 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 69'4il'2j" EAST 67.39 FEET; THENCE SOUDI 57"12'46" EAST 46.00 FEET; TIlENCESOlJTH 48'45'02" EAST 51;72 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 56'09'27" EAST 34.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 78'40'44" EAST 16.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 81'33'14" EAST 25.45 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT ON TIIE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 4 AND THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH HAVING ARADIUS OF 505.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG TIlE ARC OF SAID CURVE PASSING THROUGHA CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6'44'IO"ADISTANCEOF 59.37 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN TIlE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE SOUTH 00'49'34" WEST 6'1.40 FEET ALoNG TIIE EAStilRL Y LINE OF SAID LOT 4; . ~ P·C· E 401DLake Washington Blvd NE, Sulte'30D PETERSON Kirkland, WA 98033 ig~1WI~l (425) 827-5874 I (425) 822~?216' N:\ProjectsIORBXOOOlISVlLEGAL DESCRlPTlONSITRAIL ESMT Moe .---------------------------------- 'r • • EXHIBlTA THENCE SOUI1l54°52'IO" EAST 312.00 ,FEET MORE OR LEss ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4 TO nm WESTERLY MARGIN OF TALBOT ROAD SOUTH AND THE TERMINATION OFTIIISLINE DESCRlPTION. ' SITUATE IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. IN THE CITY OF RENTON; KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. ' ~, P:-t. E 4010 Lake Washington Blvd NE, Suite 300 PETERSON Kirkland, WA 98033 ~~~1~l,TH~ (425) 827-5874 I (425) 822,-7216 N:\Projects\ORBXOOO[\SV\LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS\TRAIL IlSMT 2,do;; '" I I I I I I I I I I I~ I III ;l; It;:: I"? I III I I I ) I I I L. • • EXHIBIT B -----1 I r --:::. TALBCiTR"OAOS -- I~ I ------"7"-_-_ I () I ;l; I to, I KCSP LOT I I,,? I llIl I KCSp LOT 3 I I I ------1 KCSP LOT 2 L14 POINT OF BEGINNING ~'~~------~--~ S. 30, T. 23 N., R. 5 E., W.M. NATIVE TRAIL EASEMENT EXHIBIT 4010 Lake Washlngion Bivd: NE, Suite 300, Kirkland, WA 98033 www.pceclvll.com (425) 827·5874 Tel (426) 822·7216 Fax DWN.BY.· DPH CHKD. BY.' MGM DATE: JOBNO, 2/19/08 OR8XOO01 SCALE: NTS PAGEt • • EXHIBIT B LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH BEARING L1 ;1.07' 582'26'25"£ L2 67,13' 530'30' 47"£ L3 6.80' 561'51'56"£ L4 71.63' 549'47'00"[ ~ L5 46,89' 527'39'40"£ L6 16.05' 533'22'14"£ L7 16.02' N84'45'Z9"E L8 67:39' 569'48'23"E' L9 46.00' 557,2'46"£ Ll0 51.72' 548'45'02"£ L11 34.70' 556'09'27"E L12 16.92' 578'40'44"E L13 25A5' 581'33'14~E L14 67;40' 500'49'34"W CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA Cl 38.6" 100,00' 22'07'20" C2 44.39' 100.00' 25'26'09" C3 59.37' 505.00' 6'44'10" NA TIVE TRAIL EASEMENT S; 30; r. 23 N., R. 5 E., W:M. EXHIBIT 4010 lake Washington Blvd, NE, aWN.BY.-DATE: JOBNO. ~ Suite 300, Kirkland, WA 98033 DPH 2/19/08 ORBXOOO1 ,www.pceclvll.com CHKD.BY: SCALE: PETE SON (425) 827-5874 Tel CO~SU~TING (425) 822-7216 Fax MGM NTS PAGE 2 I! N IN E R,I- • ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL SERVICES DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM August 20, 2009 Carrie Olson, CED -Development Services Cindy Moya, Records Management Specialist L)'N'Returned Recorded Documents: Water Utility Easement -Recording #: 20090519000822 (Valley View Professional Development, llC.) The attached document has been recorded with King County and is being returned to you. Please forward copies to parties of interest. The original will be retained by the City Clerk's Office. Thank you. Attachment cc: Bob MacOnie, PW-Utilities LUA-07-086 h:lcityc\erklrecords specialist\correspondence & memos -cindy\recorded documents\easement -olson. doc -' Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 SouthGrady Way Renton, W A 98057 • WATER UTILITY EASEMENT Project File #: U)-3f~'; • Property Tax Parcel Number: ·3023059111 Street Intersection or Project Name: Reference Number{s) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on page __ . Grantor{s}: ._ Grantee{s): • __ " • __ •. , • _ .' ••. " ,."~,,'~_~. "..t,.t."",..r.,_,~ •• ' I. VALLEY V[EW PROFESSIONAL. DEVELOPMENT LLC ! I. City of Renton, a Municipal C9rporation 2. _.---_ .. _ ... _ ... - The Grantor(s), as named above, for and in consideration of and other valuable consideration, do by these presents, grant, bargain, sell. convey, and warrant unto the above named Grantee, its successors and assigns, an easement fOT public water line with necessary appurtenances over, under, through, across and upon the following described property (the right~of-way) in King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: • , A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH ,', '" RANGE 5 EAST, W1LLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY WASHINGTON. ' .. . . .. .. EXC~' '~"'AED r Vu,,1i J p.. \!~on By, c--,J ;;> DeIlUtv 1 /. ------ ., ---...... , --._-_ .. - SEE ATTACHED EXIllBIT "A" .. -'·v" - J..eocr -OCJ 31 Page I i • • For the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, installing, repairing, replacing, enlarging, operating and maintaining Water Line utilities and utility pipelines, together with the right of ingress and egress lliereto without prior institution of any suit or proceedings of law and without incmring any legal obligation or liability therefor. Following the initial construction of its facilities, Grantee may from time to time construct such additional facilities as it may require. This easement is granted subject to the following terms and conditions: I. The Grantee shali, upon completion of any work within the property covered by the easement, restore the surface of the easement, and any private improvements disturbed or destroyed during execution of the work, as nearly as practicable to the condition they were in immediately before commencement of the work or entry by the Grantee. 2. Grantor shan retain the right to use the surface afthe easement as long as such use does not interfere with the easement rights granted to the Grantee. Grantor shali not, however, have the right to: a. Erect or 'maintain-any buildings or structures within the easement; or b. Plant trees, shrubs or vegetation having deep root patterns which may cause damage to or interfere with the utilities to be placed within the easement by the Grantee; or c. Develop, landscape, or beautify the easement area in any way which would unreasonably increase the costs to the Grantee of res taring the easement area and any private improvements therein. d. Dig. tunnel or perform other forms of construction activities on the property which would disturb the compaction or unearth Grantee's facilities on the right~of~way. or endanger the lateral support facilities. e. Blast within fifteen (15) feet of the right-of-way. This easement shall run with the land described herein, and shall be binding upon the parties, their heirs, successors in interest and assigns. Grantors covenant that they are the lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and lawful right to execute this agreement. By this conveyance, Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons, whomsoever, lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs, executors, administrators and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Grantor has caused this instrument to be executed this 1..~ day of A(f?IL. 20~. / ~cJ Notary Seal must be within box , INDlVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING ) 1 certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ________ _ -,_-:--:--:-."..,-:--:--:-;:_,,--:--::-_-;--:-__ signed this instrwnent and acknowledged it to be hislher/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print} ____________ _ My appointment expires: ____________ _ Dated: Page 2 ) -------------- I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I"': I/) I;:r: II:: .., lui I I r I • KCSP LOT 1 KCSP LOT 2 POINT OF BEG.INNING JS~~~C3jENTERLlNE NO.2 I /r I L3 L2 I ;.. I <D POINT OF BEGINNING f$3~~ CENTERLINE NO.1 L1 Map Exhibit I I ,..: 101 I~ I~ lui I I Cil o o U b_1 Do: r NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT4 PageS • -------- TALBOTRO - KCSP LOT 3 " ;:;: ;: Z , , '" a:: N<D 4: "'''' N 'iX>i:n '0 W w ~p ~ --' CD <DI"-N CD 00 "' Vlffl Z « l-I I- W " in -'<1" m Z Z <00 I"- W aj...-j .,: --' -' "'"' N W z :J _N '" ..J..J ..J _ _ ADS. Cil lJi o (1) 8.1 o ('i) I -I 1- c$ 0 so' I I ,. -100' 100' I· [<09/19/200~U;aureen Nicolay -Fwd: Valley View Trail Easement From: To: Date: Subject: Attachments: • Laureen Nicolay Betlach, Leslie; McFarland, Karen 09/19/2008 12:08 PM Fwd: Valley View Trail Easement Native Trail Easement.pdf Hello Leslie and Karen, • Attached is a recorded copy of the trail easement. Hopefully, it meets your needs. However, if it does not, I think the customer would be open to changing it if they could also omit the part of Section 2 that prohibits obstruction overthe easement? Seems they would like to build a pedestrian suspension brtdge that would cross over the trail at about 30 feet up to connect the new office building to Valley Medical Center. Let me know if you would be open to changes to the easement that would allow a suspension brtdge to cross the easement. Thank you, Laureen Laureen Nicolay, Senior Planner City of Renton Development Services 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98057 Phone: (425) 430-7294 Fax: (425) 430-7231 Inicolay@ci,renton,wa,us »> "Rick Charbonneau" <rickc@orbarchitects.com> 09/15/2008 1:23 PM »> Laureen, I had missed the language about "no structure over" in the Trail Easement, see page 2 item 2. can we have the language changed so this brtdge will be allowed? The photo below is the concept <http://www.enwood.comlimageslwoodbrtdgeslaarchIArchPedbig.jP9> htto:!Iwww.enwood.comlimageslwood bridgeslaarchlArchPed.jpg Regards, Rick Charbonneau o.r.b architects 607 SW Grady Way, Suite 210 Renton, WA 98057 (t) 425.226.3522 (f) 425.226.9115 Page 11 , , I - I / ....J « t- Il. C/) o I ....J ~ w z w (9 / • • Return Address: Nelson Law Group PLLC 600 Stewart Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98101 NATIVE TRAIL EASEMENT COVER SHEET Document Title: Native Trail Easement Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: N/A Grantor: Valley View Professional Development LLC Grantee: The City of Renton I II I I 00001 48.00 Abbreviated Legal Description: A portion of Lot 4, City of Renton East Valley Medical Park, Short Plat recorded August 15, 1978, under Recording No. 7808151009, being a portion of the Southeast quarter of Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington. See page 4 of this document for full legal description. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel Number: 3023059111 EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED B· ,I. ,Deputy ~R-" ~~ ~ TI:ffiin l.) 'F·~\ .. ;v'\;\L • • TRAIL IOASEMENT AGREEMENT THI$ AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of this Ji.!.'tay offt;-f'f'-JA'rt t , 2008 by and between Valley View Professional Development LLC (the "Grantor") and the City of Renton, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington (the "Grantee"). Recitals WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of the real property ("Property"), the full legal description of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, Grantor wishes to grant a non-exclusive easement for public trail usage ("Trail Easement") upon and across the Property as described in Exhibit A .and further shown by the map and tables attached hereto as Exhibit 8; and WHEREAS, Grantee wishes to accept the Trail Easement for the purpose of creating and maintaining a non-motorized public trail. NOW THEREFORE, to provide for the conveyance of the Trail Easement herein described, the parties agree as follows: . 1. Grant of Easement. Grantor, for and in consideration of mutual benefits, conveys and grants to Grantee and the public a perpetual, non-exclusive non-motorized Trail easement over, across, along, in, upon and under the easement area upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 2. No Obstruction. Grantee. and Grantor covenant that no structure or obstruction, including fences, shall be erected over, upon or within the Trail Easement, and no trees, bushes or other shrubbery shall be planted in the area of ground for which the Trail Easement in favor of Grantee and the public has been provided herein. 3. Easement Construction. Repair and Maintenance. .Grantee shall have the right, but not the obligation, at Grantee's own expense, to construct a pedestrian· trail within the boundaries of the Trail Easement. Grantee shall be responsible for all costs related to the repair and maintenance of the Trail Easement, and shall have the right to enter the easement area at any time to maintain the same. Grantee's responsibilities under this paragraph shall become effective upon commencement of the Trail Easement's construction, and shall remain in effect for the Trail Easement's duration. 4. Covenant Running with the Land. This easement and the covenants herein shall be covenants running with the land and shall be binding on the successors, heirs and assigns of both parties hereto. 5. Title. Grantor warrants that the Grantor has good title to the above property and warrants the Grantee title to and quiet enjoyment of the easement conveyed hereto. 2 ---------------- • -nl DATED this K of ntfZ-, .. wfl ,( .2008 Grantor: Valley View Professional Development LLC sy:1Z..."c' &L- I Its: H~H ~(f;1?= STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) 55. COUNTY OF KING ) • On this \"\~ day of :K.b.,.w;.,,,'f 2008, before me personally appeared "R.,,,\;,,, Lh.,.,6. .. " .... y. the individual who executed the within and foregoing instrument. and acknowledged the saidil)strument to be a free and voluntary act and deed for the use and purposes therein mentioned. and on oath stated that he/she is authorized to execute the said instrument. Given under my hand and official seal on the day and year first above written. Washington. residing at _1<\;::;;:._;=:l"-l..!:uJ~,----__ Print Name: ..J'B~':.!l.\.I.~I..!::...!.'----Lq.lI..!D,.i..!.:~ __ My commission expires _.=!.=~L... __ 3 • EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF NATIVE TRAIL EASEMENT ACRO:,!STAX LOT NUMBER 3023059111 ORBXOOOI FEBRUARY 19, 2008 • A 15 FOOT WIDE TRAIL EASEMENT WITHIN THAT PORTION OF LOT 4, EAST VALLEY MEDICAL PARK SHORT PLAT, FILED UNDER RECORDING NuMBER 7808151009, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING sourt-lERL Y OF THE,FOLLOWING DESCRIBEDHNE: . BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE SOUTH 82°26'25" EAST ,11.07 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE SOUTH 30°30'47" EAST 67.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 61 °51 '56" EAST 6.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 49°47'00" EAST 71.63 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1 00.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE PASSING THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22°07'20" A DISTANCE QF 38.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27°39'40" EAST 46.89 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 33°22'14" EAST 16.05 FEET; Tl:IENCE NORTH 84°45'29" EAST 16.02 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH HAVING A RADIDS OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE.ARCOF SAID CURVE PASSING THROUGH.A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25°26'09" A DISTANCE OF 44.39 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 69°48'23" EAST 67.39 FEET; THENCE SOUTII 57° 12'46" EAST 46.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 48°45'02" EAST 51.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 56°09'27" EAST 34.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 78°40'44" EAST 16;92 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 81 °33' 14" EAST 25.45 FEET TO AN ANGLTIPOINT ON THE EASTERl.Y LlNE OF SAID LOT 4 AND THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH HAVING A RADIUS OF 505.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE PASSING THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6°44'10"A DISTANCE OF 59.37 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE SOUTH 00°49'34" WEST 67.40 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 4; ~ p.c:. E 4010 Lake Washington Blvd NE, Suite'300 PETERSON Kirkland, WA9,8033 1~~1~L.'~~g (425) 827-5874 I (425) 822-7216' N:lProjectsIORRXOOO\ISVlLEGAL DESCRIPTIONSITRAIL ESMT 2.doc ., • • EXHIBIT A THENCE SOUTIl 54°52'10" EAST 312.00 FEET MORE OR LESS ALONG THE NORTIl LINE OF SAID LOT 4 TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF TALBOT ROAD SOUTH AND THE TERMINATION OF TIllS LINE DESCRIPTION. SITUATE IN THE SOUTH HALF OF 'I'HESOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, .. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTIl, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNl'Y, WASHINGTON. . ~ p.-t .. E 4010 Lake Washington Blvd NE, Suite 300 PETERSON Kirkland, WA 98033 1~~\~','i~i (42S) 827-5874 I (425) 822-7216 N:IProjectsIORBXOOOllSV\LEGAL DESCRIPTIONSITRAIL ESMT 2.doc • • EXHIBIT B -----1./ r --~~O!ROAOS. --_ I,.: I ---7'""-_. 10 I :r 1'1;; I I I~ I KCSP LOT 1 I III KCSP LOT 3 I I 1 1 I I I I I L I 1 1 I I ----1 --\ \ I KCSP LOT 2 L14 I,.: 1111 I~ I r--__ -Ujr? I~ 1111 I I I ) ~~ ___ P_O_1N~T_O~F~B~EG~I~N~N:1N~G~ ____________ ~ S. 30, T. 23 N" R, 5 E., W.M. 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, Suite 300, Kirkland, WA 98033 www.pceclvll.com (425) 827·5874Tel (425) 822·7216 Fax NATIVE TRAIL EASEMENT EXHIBIT OWN, BY: OPH CHKD. BY: MGM DATE: 2/19/08 SCALE: NTS JOB NO ORBXOOOI PAGE 1 • • EXHIBIT B LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH BEARING Ll 11.07' 582'26'25"E L2 67.13' 530'30'47"E L3 6.80' 561'51'56"E L4 71.63' 549'47'OO"E L5 46,89' 527'39' 40"E L6 16.05' 533'22'14"E L7 16.02' N84'45'29"E L8 67.39' 569'48'23"E L9 46.00' 55712'46"E L10 51.72' 548'45'02"E Ll1 34.70' 556'09'27"E L12 16.92' 578'40' 44"E L13 25.45' 581'33'14"E L14 67AO' 500'49'34"W CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA Cl 38.61' 100.00' 22'07'20" C2 44.39' 100.00' 25'26'09" C3 59.37' 505.00' 6'44'10" NATIVE TRAIL EASEMENT S. 30, T. 23 N .. R. 5 E., W.M. EXHIBIT ~ 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, OWN. BY: DATE: JOB NO. 5ulte 300, Kirkland, WA 98033 DPH 2/19/08 OR8XOO01 www.pcecivll.com CHKO. BY: SCALE: PETERSON (425) 827-5874 Tel PAGE 2 CONSULTING (425) 822-7216 Fax MGM NTS INGIN!eRS ,----------------------------------------------,--, ---_. ,---- , Jennifer Henning~ ~~~:y"a~ey View LeQ~!.rip!i~~S From: To: Date: Subject: Leslie Betlach Jan lilian 09/08/20084:08:46 PM Fwd: Valley View Legal Descriptions Hi Jan, here is one of many e-mails, Larry Warren first approved the easement back in January contingent upon Parks approval (which it did not meet) A series of e-mails followed to revise the language, The developer was OK with providing an easement. Would like an update this week if possible as I will be going to Council in 2 weeks to talk about a potential acquisition which would tie into this easement eventually, Thanks, Leslie » Karen McFarland 2/13/2008 12:58 PM >>> Hi Geoff, Staff has reviewed the legal descriptions on the above referenced project and have the following sets of comments: NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT: -=~~age]l -We would like to see "In the City of Renton" added to the caption's Indexing language. Specifically, we ask that the Indexing information in the first paragraph of the legal description be changed as follows: "in Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Rentori; King County, Washington" ,Please make sure that the exhibits conform to King County's Standard Formatting Requirements. Specifically, staff notes that each exhibit must have a 1" margin on all sides. TRAIL EASEMENT: -The proposed legal does not correspond to Park's staff request. Based on discussions with the City's Parks Department staff, Technical Services staff proposes that the caption be changed to the following: "A 15-foot wide trail easement within that portion of Lot 4. East Valley Medical Park Short Plat. filed under Recording Number 7808151009, Records of King County, Washington, lying southerly of the following described line:" -We also ask that indexing information be included at the end of the full legal description. We would suggest the following: "Situate in the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W,M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington." -Please remove all text noted In the attachments. -Please make sure that the exhibits conform to King County's Standard Formatting Requirements. Specifically, staff notes that each exhibit must have a 1" margin on all sides. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Jennifer Hen~inJL"~wd: Va~~ View Legal .riPtions Karen McFarland City of Renton PBPWI Utility Systems Divl Tech. Svcs. 425.430.7209 (voice) 425.430.7241 (fax) kmcfarland@ci.renton.wa.us »> Leslie Betlach Tuesday, February 12, 2008 12:39 PM »> Hi Geoff, ~--.--~-.- I spoke with Karen McFarland from Technical Services this afternoon and she is preparing a response. She will be able to provide more information and can be contacted at 425-430-7209. Thanks, Leslie Leslie A Betlach Parks Director City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 425-430-6619 Ibetlach@ci.renton.wa.us »> "Geoff Anderson" <geoffa@orbarchitects.com>2/11/2008 10:16:20 AM >>> Leslie - Thank you for following up on this easement issue. I understand that you are busy with your move so any attention you can give this at your meeting this afternoon is greatly appreciated. We are hoping to avoid any delays to our building permit as a result. . Attached you will find the most recent information for your review. Geoff E. Anderson, AlA Principal, LEEDT AP ORB architects 607 SW Grady Way, Suite 210 Renton, WA 98057 (t) 425.226.3522 (f) 425.226.9115 geoffa@orbarchitects.com -----Original Message----- From: Rick Charbonneau !mailto:rickc@orbarchitects.coml Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 12:34 PM To: geoffa@orbarchitects.com Subject: FW: LUA 07-086 Valley View Easements Geoff, Hopefully you can get this thru. Here is our last revision to the trail easement and native growth easement. Leslie Betlach is the same P&R person who had us make the revision. She last talked directly with our surveyor per memo below. , Page ~ j Email received 11/30107 Rick, I talked to Leslie Betlock with the City of Renton yesterday and tried to clarify the description. She is still not satisfied with the legal description so I have revised it to hopefully make it clearer. Attached is the revised legal description and exhibit, please review it and let me know if it still unclear or confusing. Do you want me to email Leslie a copy as well? If so I will need her email address. Denise Holcomb, P.L.S. Peterson Consulting Engineers 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, Suite 300 Kirkland, WA 98033 (425) 827-58741 fax (425) 822-7216 www.pcecivil.com -----Original Message----- From: Rick Charbonneau [mailto:rickc@orbarchitects.coml Sent: Thursday, December 13, 200710:11 AM To: 'Elizabeth Higgins' Cc: 'josh@nelsonlawgroup.com'; 'geoffa@orbarchitects.com' Subject: LUA 07-086 Valley View Easements Elizabeth, Please find attached our revisions to the two easement agreements as requested by the City attorney. Also note the trail easement legal description has been changed (clarified) as requested by the Parks Department. Regards, Rick Charbonneau o.r.b architects 607 SW Grady Way, Suite 210 Renton, WA 98057 (t) 425.226.3522 (f) 425.226.9115 -----Original Message----- From: Elizabeth Higgins [mailto:Ehiggins@ci.renton.wa.usl Sent: Tuesday, December 11,20074:10 PM To: Rick Charbonneau Subject: Valley View Legal Description Property Services has responded to my inquiry by reporting that their comments are being reviewed by the Division supervisor and will be forthcoming as soon as he has completed his review. Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Senior Planner Development Services Renton City Hall, Sixth Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton Washington 98057 (t)425-430-7382 (f)425-430-7300 I i • EXHIBIT A LEGALDESCRlPTION OF NATIVE TRAIL EASEMENT ACROSS TAX LOT NUMBER 3023059111 OJ.U3xooo 1 .... . NOVEMBER 30, 2007 • TIIAT PORTION OF LOT 4, EAST VALLEY MEDICAL PARK SHORT PLAT,FlLED UNDERRECORDING NuMBER 7808151009;imcoRns OF KING COuNrY, W ASfiINGTO~, SITUJI,TElN THE s9UTHHALF OF THE SOUT~HEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. IN· G COUNTY, . WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS,. , . A 15 FOOT wIDE EASEMENT FOR TRAIL PURPOSES WITHIN THE ABOVE DESCRIBEDP ARCEL AND LYING sOUlmRi Y OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: • . BEG1NNlNG AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE SOUTH 82'26'25" EAST 11.07 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE SOUTH 30'30'47" EAST 67.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 61 '51 '56" EAST 6,80 FEET; THENCE SOUl'H 49'47'00" EAST 71.63 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIDS OF 100,00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE PASSING THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22'07'20" A DISTANCE OF 38,61 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27'39'40" EAST 46,89 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 33'22'14" EAST 16.05 FEET; THENCE NORTH 84'45'29" EAST 16,02 FEET TO THE BEG1NNlNG OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH HAVING A RADIDS OF 100,00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE PASSINGTHROUGHA CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25'26'09" A DISTANCE OF 44.39 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 69'48'23" EAST 67.39 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 57'12'46" EAST 46.00 FEET; THENCE S'OUTH 48°45'02" EAST 51.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 56'09'27" EAST 34,70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 78°40'44" EAST 16,92 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 81"33'14" EAST 25.45 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 4 AND THE BEG1NNlNG OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH HAVING A·RADIDS OF 505,72 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE PASSING THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00'51'00" A DISTANCE OF 7.50 FEET TOA-4'8IN'f fn:'·~·,,..p WREP;' ITER lWFl3R£i3 'fO h9 P8IPR'2\:', r uWUU'J '- 11lENCE CONT1NUlNG ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE PASSING THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05'52'35" A DISTANCE OF 51.87 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 4; ~ p. C· E 4010 Lake Washington Blvd NE, Suite 300 PETERSON Kirkland, WA 98033 ~~~\~L,Td~~ (425) 827·5874 I (425) 822·7216 N:\PrejectsIORBXOOOl\SV\LEGAL DESCRIPTIONSITRAIL ESMT 2.dec • TIffiNCE soUTH 00°49'34" WEST 67.40 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE,OF SAID L9 T4; .. '. . . ' .. ,' ... ,'... . . , TI¢NCESOUTH 54°57 'lq" EA~T3I2,9~~~ET MoR,E ()11 LES~f\LOJ:1q TFr;E ~0:R'I'H .' ~INE ()F SAID LOT 4 TO 'THE. WIlSTElt(XNf~GlN OF 'fALI30T.ROAD SOUTH »ro. iil.'ETERMrNAl1oNoJ.lTHrsflNE.DESCRlPTION. • . ' .. ". ".,.', T~1EMENTB'" ' ~ , P-t. E 4010 Lake Washington Blvd NE, Suite 300 PETERSON Kirkland, WA 98033 i~~1~L,rI~~ (425) 827-5874 I (425) 822-7216 N:lProjectsIORBXOOOllSV\LEGAL DESCRIPTIONSITRAIL ESMT 2,doc • UNE L1 L2 L3 l4 LS L6 L7 L8 L9 L10 L11 L12 L13 L14 CURVE Cl C2 C3 C4 S, 30, T. 23 N" R, 5 E., WM. LI N E, J,A.BI.,E I£NGTH ,'SEARING ,11.07:.':' 582'26'25"E .67.13'·" 530'30' 47"E '6,BO' . 56;"Sl'S6"[ 71.63' 549'47'00"E 4'6.8'9' , ',. 527'39'40"E 16,05' 533"22'14"E 16,02',' , N84'45'29"E ;67,39" 569'48'23"E '4600"'-':': . 557,'l2'46"E '51.72' . 548'45'02"E '34.70' 556'09'27"E 16.92' 578'40'44"E 25.45' . '58"1'}3'14"E 67.40' 500'49' 34"W CURVE TAsLE LENGTH. RADIUS DELTA 38.61' 100,'00' 22'07'20" 44.39' 100.00' 2S'26'09" 7,SO' SOS,72' O'S1'OO" S1.87' SOS,72' 5'S7' ,lS" • o£ Q$1 ~,> DPH NA TlVE TRAIL EASEMENT EXHIBIT DATE: JOB 11/30/07 OR8XOOOI 4010 lake Washington Blvd, NE, Suite 300, Kirkland, WA 98033 www.pceclvil.com (425) 827-5874 Tel CHKD, BY: SCALE.' (425) 822-7216 Fax MGM 1" = lOa' PAGE 2 l' • • -'"""" -~ 'EXHIBITA r;EGALDESGRIPTION9fNATIvE GROWTH PRoTEciUoN EASEMENT AcRoss TAX LOT NuMBER 3023059111 .. 91W)(;9.()Ql .. ' .. .... . •. NOVEli1l3"E:R 5, 2007 ", :' . .' . , . l THA: .. ' ••... 1' ... PO .. R.' TION O. F. L.OT.,,· ... 4.:.· .. ,.,EAS .. T .. ' V. ALLEY MED~CAL.P .... ',hRK ...... ~.J .• I.O .... R.T.'. p .... LAT, FIL. ED '~'. ~: \ ". UNDERRECORDINGNSMBER7808151009,RECORDS.OFKINGCOUNTY, '&J . SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTIl, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M.IN ' G COUNTY, '. WA. SlIIN ..... GTON,SITu ..• AT.:E .. iNTI ... lllSOUTHHALFOF. THE." .SOUTHE.,.·~ ... A .. ·.ST.QUARTEROF. ~. '; WASHiNGTON, LYlNG.SptJrH OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRiB .' . . . . . . . CqMMENCiNG AT 'fHE:NOR~ST CORNER OF S@LOT4; THENCE SOUTH 82°26'2?"EAST 1 1.07 FEET ALONG THE NORTIlLINE OF SAIDW!' 4 TO THE TRUE POINT OFBEGINNING; ".' '. T.l3ENCE SOUTII 'Ja030'4'i'; EAST 67.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTIl 61 0 51'5f'EAsT 6.80 FEh!; TIiENCE SOUTIl 49°47'OQ~' EA~T 71,63 FEET TO THE BEGINNING .OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWESTHAVlNG A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET; TlIENCE SOUTHEASTERLY AiONG THE ARC OF SAID cuRvE PASSING THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22°07'20" A DISTANCE OF 38.61 FEET; 11'lENCE SOUTH 27°39'40" EAST 46.89 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 33OZ2'14" EAST 16.05 FEET; THENCE NORTIl 84°45'29" EAST 16.02 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO TIIE souTH HA '\lING A RADIUS OF 100,00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE PASSING THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25'26'09" A DISTANCE OF 4439 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 69°48'23" EAST 67.39 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 57°12'46" EAST 46,00 FEET; THENCE SOUTIl 48°45'02" EAST 51.72 FEET; liIENCE SOUTH 56°09'27" EAST 34.70 FEET; TI-IENCE SOUTH W40'44" EAST 16,92 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 81 °33' 14" EAST 25,45 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT ON THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID LOT 4 L YlNG SOUTH 07°33 '35" WEST 247 FEET MORE OR LESS FROM TIlE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4 AND THE TERMINATION OF THIS DESCRIPTION. ~ p. C'IE 4010 Lake Washington Blvd NE, Suite 300 PETERSON Kirkland, WA 98033 i~~1~W~j (425) 827-5874 I (425) 822-7216 N:IProjectsIORBXOOOI ISV\LEGAL DESCRIPTIONSINGPA ESMT I.doc . ".; J. Carlos Santuario 411 S 36th Street Renton, WA 98055 tel: (425) 445-5596 (party of record) Bonnie Victor 400 S 37th Street Renton, WA 98055 tel: (425) 226-9194 (party of record) Edna M. Remy 408 S 37th Street Renton, WA 98055 tel: (425) 271-2543 (party of record) Updated: 09/21/07 PARTIES OF RECORD VALLEY VIEW PROF OFFICE LUA07-086, SA-H, ECF Dr. Daniel O'Brien 400 S 38th Court Renton, WA 98055 tel: (425) 255-6008 (party of record) Stephanie Ryan 404 S 37th Street Renton, WA 98055 (party of record) Victoria Lerner 3510 Shattuck Avenue S Renton, WA 98055 tel: (425) 227-7918 (party of record) Binh Nguyen Valley View Professional Development, LLC 607 SW Grady Way ste: #210 Renton, WA 98057 tel: (425) 226-3522 eml: binhn@orbarchitects.com (owner / applicant / contact) (Page 1 of 1) .. • ---------------------- • • WA07-0gfp 1I1111U I 2r1JrlJ°"'~·~1000002 Return Address: Nelson Law Group PLLC 600 Stewart Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98101 46.00 NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT COVER SHEET Document Title: Native Growth Protection Easement Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: N/A Grantor: Valley View Professional Development LLC Grantee: The City of Renton Abbreviated Legal Description: A portion of Lot 4, City of Renton East Valley Medical Park, Short Plat recorded August 15, 1978, under Recording No. 7808151009, being a portion of the Southeast quarter of Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington. See page 4 of this document for full legal description. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel Number: 3023059111 ClnQfl;&lon RECE1VeD r·tB 22_ EXCISE TAX NOT REQUlRED ~1~rdS By ~!y+\~ F"~\?- • • NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of this d!!day of ff61!-vny ,2008 by and between Valley View Professional Developmentt:IC (the "Grantor") and the City of Renton, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington (the "Grantee"). Recitals WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of the real property ("Property"), the full legal description of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, Grantor wishes to grant a non-exclusive easement for native growth protection ("NGPE") upon and across the Property as described in Exhibit A and further shown by the map and tables attached hereto as Exhibit 8; and WHEREAS, Grantee wishes to accept the NGPE for the purpose of preserving native vegetation for the control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, visual and aural buffering, and protection of plant and animal habitat; NOW THEREFORE, to provide for the conveyance of the NGPE herein described, the parties agree as follows: 1. Grant of Easement. Grantor, for and in consideration of mutual benefits, conveys and grants to Grantee a perpetual, non-exclusive NGPE over, across, along, in, upon and under the easement area upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 2. No Disturbance. Grantor covenants to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the easement area. Grantor shall not cut, prune, cover by fill, remove or damage the vegetation within the NGPE without express written permission from Grantee. 3. Easement Repair and Maintenance. Grantor shall have no responsibility to repair or maintain the NGPE, provided that Grantor shall restore the NGPE to its condition preceding any disturbance caused by Grantor in violation of Paragraph 2, above. Grantee may, at its election, repair and maintain the NGPE, and shall have the right to enter the easement area at any time to repair and maintain the same. 4. Covenant Running with the Land. This easement and the covenants herein shall be covenants running with the land and shall be binding on the successors, heirs and assigns of both parties hereto. 5. Title. Grantor warrants that the Grantor has good title to the above property and warrants the Grantee title to and quiet enjoyment of the easement conveyed hereto. 2 • • Til DATED this ~ of feG7?'-'I/=(Z r' ,2008 Grantor: Valley View Professional Development LLC By: '1Z~ CeL-I Its: Hfr1lletZ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) 55. COUNTY OF KING ) On this 1"'1 tJ--day of l="t.I.t"IA..A"'jf 2008, before me personally appeared 1< i <-Ie.. C"",", b""" «A.'" , the individual who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be a free and voluntary act and deed for the use and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he I she is authorized to execute the said instrument. Given under my hand and official seal on the day and year first above written. <\3~tT~ NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at K."",1, WI'! Print Name: 'rle H.'/ L. Ao"" SO" My commission expires :1.\ ~1iC Iv, 3 • • EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF NATIVE GROWTIl PROTECTION EASEMENT ACROSS TAX LOT,NUMBER 3023059111 ORBXOOOI FEBRUARY 19,2008 TIIAT PORTION OF LOT 4, EAST VALLEY MEDICAL PARK SHORT PLAT, FILED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7808151009, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SITUATE IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTIIEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTIl, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTIl OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; TIlENCE SOUTH 82°26'25" EAST 11.07 FEET ALONG THE NORTIl LINE OF SAID LOT 4 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 30°30'47" EAST 67.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTIl 61°51'56" EAST 6.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTII 49°47'00" EAST 71.63 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE PASSING THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22°07'20" A DISTANCE OF 38.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTIl 27°39'40" EAST 46.89 FEET; THENCE SOUTIl 33°22'14" EAST 16.05 FEET; THENCE NORTIl 84°45'29" EAST 16.02'FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTII HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE PASSING THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25°26'09" A DISTANCE OF 44.39 FEET; THENCE SOUTII 69°48'23" EAST 67.39 FEET; TIIENCE SOUTII 57°12'46" EAST 46.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTIl 48°45'02" EAST 51.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTIl 56°09'27" EAST 34.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 78°40'44" EAST 16.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTII 81 °33' 14" EAST 25.45 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT ON THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID LOT 4 LYING SOUTH 07°33'35" WEST 247 FEET MORE OR LESS FROM TIlE NORTHilAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4 AND TIlE TERMINATION OF TIllS DESCRIPTION. ~ 9~ni~ft,:$~I'~ "-li~ l!. ~.~~ ~ :1<~'Jf' .;' 'I~::; 1 ~, CS-p. C . E 4010 Lake Washington Blvd NE, Suite 300 PETERSON Kirkland, WA 98033 ." i, "" 1 '" ~ ~; :0 0'" ";I! :'; ... ~, ,~ .. " .U612 _~"" • .;:.. ,I , ·' •• ~G/ST\C\\~"'· ,,<-.'1> :to · .. 70 .... • c;,\) "" "'''It LAi'\\) ",,"Ii; EXPIRES, B-IS-08 1~~1~~TJ~~ (425) 827-5874 I (425) 822-7216 N:IProjectsIORBXOOOl\SV\LEGAL DESCRIPTIONSINGPA ESMT I.doc ------------------------------------------- • • EXHIBIT B ----1 I r --~~O! ROAD s. --- I~ I - I (,) I } I I I I I IE I co I I "? I KCSP LOT 1 I (J) KCSP LOT 3 I I I I : I L I -- I -----I KCSP LOT 2 I ~r-:SDr3YWW';":~llJ I (J) I \ S07'JJ'JS"W IE 247.15' : ~ NORTHEAST CORNER I (J) OF LOT 4 NA TIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT KCSP LOT 4 TRUE POINT '" OF BEGINNING ...l Q v ",:> POINT OF COMMENCEMENT ~.~--------------~ S. 30, T. 23 N., R. 5 E., w.M. NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT EXHIBIT ~ 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, OWN. BY: DATE: JOBNa. Suite 300, Kirkland, WA 98033 DPH 2/19/08. OR8XOOO1 www.pceclvll.com CHKD. BY: SCALE: PETERSON (425) 827-5874 Tel PAGEt CONSULTING (425) 822-7216 Fax MGM NrS ENGINEERS -------------------- -. Valley View Professio.ffice Conditions of Development (.mary) LUA07-086 Project Condition Source of When Compliance Party Responsible Notes Condition is Required Project construction shall ERC During Construction ApplicanU comply with the Contractor recommendations contained in the geotechnical report prepared by GEO Group Northwest, Inc. (dated December 6, 2006). Erosion control shall be ERC During Construction ApplicanU installed and maintained Contractor during construction in accordance with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment. Control Requirements as outlined in the 2005 Stormwater Management Manual. The storm water detention ERC Construction Permit Applicant system for this project Review shall be designed to comply with the requirements found in the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual to meet both detention (Conservation Flow control -a.k.a. Level 2) and water quality improvements. Pay Transportation ERC Prior to issuance of Applicant $46;425.00 Mitigation Fee building permit Pay Fire Mitigation Fees ERC Prior to issuance of Applicant $13,832.00 building permit A 15-foot wide trail Hearing Prior to the issuance Applicant easement on the south Examiner of building permit portion of the project site, along Panther Creek, shall be dedicated and recorded to the City of Renton Parks Department. • '-. Valley View professio.ffice Conditions of Development (.mary) LUA07-086 A Native Growth Hearing Prior to the issuance Applicant Protection Easement Examiner of a building permit. (NGPE) shall be recorded over the onsite protected slope areas, wetlands, stream, and their associated buffer areas. The edge of the NGPE Hearing Prior to the issuance Applicant! shall be delineated with a Examiner of a Building Contractor split rail fence and Permit!Occupancy identified with signage as Permit approved by the Development Services Division Project Manager. A fencing and signage detail shall be submitted to the Development Services Division project manager at the time of building permit review for review and approval. The fencing and signage shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The site plan shall be Hearing Prior to the issuance Applicant revised to either relocate Examiner of building permit the secondary access further to the west to eliminate the need for a fire truck turnaround, or an approved fire truck turnaround shall be provided in the northwest corner of the surface parking lot subject to the approval of the Renton Fire Department. Haul hours are limited Code During Construction Applicant! from 8:30 am to 3:30 pm Contractor/Builder Monday through Friday Within 30 days of Code During Project Applicant! completion of grading Construction Contractor/Builder work the applicant shall hydroseed or plant appropriate vegetation. Construction hours are Code During Project Applicant! from 7:00 am to 8:00 pm Construction Contractor/Builder Monday through Friday and 9:00 am to 8:00 pm on Saturday and no work is allowed on Sundays. • • AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. County of King ) Nancy Thompson being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 16 th day of October 2007, affiant deposited via the United States Mail a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: Application, Petition or Case No.: Public ifu,for the tate of Washington ing at k, therein. Valley View Professional Office LUA 07-086, SA-H, ECF The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. w z o N . ...J .« 1""-" I"""' -I- Z W --~ • 0% -/ /~~7:!:-/.~J . CJ) ~/ W c::: • --1UJ :::£z UO O::N UJw .~ U, ~. u:: . OLL UO DEVELOPMENT PlANNING CITY OF RENTON k . b . AUGlg . 2007',. .' ... RECEIVED. ' .......... '. ::'.~ ... CA ZONING PIBIPW 'D!CHNICAL 8BllVICBS 02l28I07 R-l Ave: SE I3 • 31 T23N RSE E 112 - - - -Benton d1~ Umlt.l! o !YO too ''''00 H3 30 T23N RSE· E .... , . SS006 NOWNIHSYM 'N01N3M 133M1S H1L. Hlnos XXt l.N3I'Ido13!l3a 301±10 lVNOISS3,j()i:ld M31II A311V A I "",--"-', / ----"""'-,,"'/,//,r- (---;->//' /,-/ /' - .. · .. ·1111 ...... · .......... U I I i •• ! I I • II II II 13 • • 'l'l' ! h h h • • 11 • • • ~ ~ 11 ! 1111 ! .. iii r ~ ~~~ S'SOBS N01~NIHSVM" 'N01N3H 13JH1S H1L£ Hlnos XXt ~d013l\3a· 3QI±IO lVNOISS3,j()lId M3III A311V II , , I , , , , , , , , , , ~!; , , , , i~ , , . , ~~ ~ .. ~: ",!1 ~ Udi ~ ,,;! !Q 0 II] '<i: II Cl " i(J) II <!l ~ Zz l:; c: • ~~ c:> . U N .. t !zit! (Y> ... -WlL ..... U • :00 .. (1) (. • ~5 a u • c ~ . ,.-, ·z 0 .~ i ~ .-! ~ ~ ~~ , , • CITY OF RENTON • DETERMINATION OF NON·SIGNIFICANCE·MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUA07-086, SA-H & ECF Binh Nguyen Valley View Professional Development, LLC 607 SW Grady Way, ste 210 Renton, WA 98057 Valley View Professional Office DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a 26,600 square foot combination general office and medical/dental office building and associated parking and landscaping improvements. The project site totals 244,807 square feet (5.6 acres) and is zoned Commercial Office (CO). Project construction would occur on the north portion of the project site due to steep slopes, a class 2 stream, a category 2 wetland, and a category 3 wetland occupying the south portion of the project site. A class 2 stream requires a 100-foot buffer, a category 2 wetland requires a 50-foot buffer and a category 3 wetland requires a 25-foot buffer. Primary access to the site would be provided off of S 38th Court. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: South of S 37th Street, west of S 38th Court (parcel 3023059111) The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. Project construction shall comply with the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report prepared by GEO Group Northwest, Inc. (dated December 6, 2006). 2. Erosion control shall be installed and maintained during construction in accordance with the Department cif Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements as outlined in the 2005 Stormwater Management Manual. . 3. The stormwater detention system for this project shall be designed to comply with the requirements found in the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual to meet both detention (Conservation Flow control -a.k.a. Level 2) and water quality improvements. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 for each new average weekday trip attributable to the project prior to the issuance of building permits. This fee is currently estimated at $46,425.00. 5. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new commercial building area prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee is estimated at $13,832.00. ERC Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 , • , ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE September 10', 2007 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator I. David Daniels, Fire Chief Alex Pietsch, EDNSP Administrator From: Jennifer Henning, Development Planning Meeting Date: Monday, September 10, 2007 , Time: ,,3:00 PM J Location: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Agenda listed below. Valley View Professional Office (Ding) LUA07-086, SA-H, ECF The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a 26,600 square foot combination general office and medical/dental office building and associated parking and landscaping improvements. The project site totals 244,807 square feet (5.6 acres) and is zoned Commercial Office (CO). Project construction would occur on the north portion of the project site due to steep slopes, a class 2 stream, a category 2 wetland, and a category 3 wetland occupying the south portion of the project site. A class 2 stream requires a 100-foot buffer, a category 2 wetland requires a 50-foot buffer and a category 3 wetland requires a 25-foot buffer. Primary access to the site would be provided off of S 38th Court. Boeing Linear Park Renovation Addendum (Henning) LUA02-141, CPA, R, ECF The Boeing Company is proposing to renovate a private linear park located along the west side of Logan Avenue North within the Boeing Renton Plant property. This linear park, constructed during the mid-1970's, is presently a combination of open lawn areas, ornamental shrub plantings, and an 8-foot wide asphalt walking path. There are also areas for active and passive recreation opportunities, including basketball, horseshoe and volleyball courts, and seating areas. cc: K. Keolker, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer S. Dale Estey, EDNSP Director ® C. Walls, Fire Prevention N. Watts, P/B/PW Development Services Director ® F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner M. Peterson, Fire Prevention ® J. Medzegian, Council P. Hahn, P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director R. lind. Economic Development L. Warren. City Attorney ® • ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION & PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Honeybrook Circi. Division II Preliminary Plat PROJECT NUMBER: LUA07.G85, PP, ECF LOCAnON: 615 NE"" SlrHt 1'02305UM and 102305U08, DESCRIPTION: AppLication 'or Environmental Review and Preliminary Pial approval lor I 26"01 pili In the R-8 zona. Subject Ille II 4.12 Icr .. on the south aida 01 NE 8th Street between Field Avanue NE Ind Hoquiam Avan .. " NE. The axlatlng hom. will ba removed. PropOIOad lots will range from 4,500 aquare 'aet to ',3a8 aqua,. feU, with I density of 8.00 dwelling unltalac .... No cntlcal.rea. hIve IIHn ld.nUlled onslle. THE CITY OF RENTON ,ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. ApPlals olthl anvlronmlntal determination must bl flied In writing on or bllo ... 5:00 PM on Oclober 8, 2007. Appeal8 must be flied in writing loglthr with Ihi required $75.00 application fel with: Hlarlng Examiner, City 01 Rlnlon, 1055 South Grady Way, Rlnlon, WA 98057. APpoill:a 10 Ihi Euminll .... govlmld by City of RlHIIon Municipal Codl S&etion 4~-110.B. Addltion.1 informiltlon ... gardlng thl .ppeill proc .. s may bl obblnld from 11"11 R.nton City CI.rk's OffIel,. (425) 430-6510. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY,. RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON OCTOBER 9, 2007 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE PRELIMINARY PLAT. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAl DETERMINAllON IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CERTIFICATION I, '>:71/ ~t'A:. , hereby certify that ~ copies of the above document - --...L--",\\\\1\1\11 were posted by me in ~ conspicuous places or nearby the described roperty 9cF':',\;-INN f.{d.~111 .:::-{.(<J. ~\'\\"~I ~" :{t <,~ ,,)N (r.,;.:"",d~~~ ~ . (~lA .. ~:.~ ,. -). ....~ :.....: DA TE:----'-1--=·'Z:...LI/--=·"l~-_ SIGNED: -: ;:'..j ,))"~ ~ A ITEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public. in and for the State of Washington residing'b \ .4 . v -1 § ;I,(n"1 /j~",~ .~o~­"I-~f ~r.:J \J~- 1 ,-" "'1<~19-"\ ........ ~"~_': ,-!, ~~~~~~" ~v.:::-'""'''''''~:':':'~~::7'2~'::-P. WAS""'".$' \1\\\\"'" STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING} AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on September 15,2007. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$15 1.20. • ~.;PZ4P# inda M. Mills Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter Subscribed and sworn to me this 24th day of September, 2007. \\\11111/111 Q {1Yr'riJ.JJfYJ ,,\ 0 C4 /" I!J .;:." '?> ........ .'V1'}", , •• ;..",SS/O'-·. ''-' , B D Cantelon .;:-.',,0 'I< ,,"~. '0'-:' ,. ~., Notary Public for the State ofwashinWd:'j'Iiesidill!!J\!.l Ken~w.ilsington P. O. Number: = ~ ! PU8~fiy ~l -:: ~ <..Ie: -;.. ((\ .. ~ ..:-"0··'"0 .• ~~ " A'-···.~/201 0 ••••• 0 .:-.., 11-: ........ 0" " '1111 4SH\~ "", 1111/111\\\\ NOTICE OF F.NVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (& PUBLIC HEARING) RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Detennination of Non-Significance- Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Munidpal Code. Valley View Professional Office LUA07'{)86,SA.H, ECF Location: South of S 37th Street, West of S 38th Court (pal'Cf'1 302305911]). ThE' applicnnt is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a 26,600 square foot combination general office and medical/dental office building and associat.ed parking and landscaping improvements. The project site totals 244,807 square feet (5.6 acre!.') and is zoned Commercial Office (CO). Project construction wouJd occur on the north portion of the project site due to steep slopes. a class 2 stream, a category 2 wetland, and a category 3 wetland occupying the south portion of the project site. A class 2 stream requires a laO-foot buffer, a category 2 wetland requires a 50- foot buffer and a category 3 wetland requires a 25-foot buffer. Primary a.cress to the site would be provided off of S 38th C-ourt. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 6:00 PM on October 1, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton. 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.8. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430· 6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the CoWlcil Chambers, City Hall, on October 9, 2007 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Plan. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of thiH public bearing. Interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing. Published in the Renton .Reporters September 15. 2007. 11864109 • • • W King County Wastewater Treatment Division Department of Natural Resources and Parks King Street Center 201 South Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104-3855 September 24, 2007 Jill K. Ding, Senior Planner Dept. ofPlanninglBuildinglPublic Works City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, W A 98057 Dear Ms. Ding RE: Valley View Professional Office {Tl'!!:fK&z.:;mffi7 • pVJ'lNING oEV~~'t,~%NTON SEP 272007' RECE\'JEO The King County Wastewater Treatment Division has reviewed the Determination of Non- Significance -Mitigated dated September 10,2007. King County's South Renton Trunk is located within or near the proposed location of your project (please see the attached drawings and ariel photo). In order to protect this wastewater facility, King County is requesting that the City of Renton do the following: • Submit sewer extension plans and modifications to King County for review and approval. • Submit construction drawings for the project to our Asset Management section. Drawings should be submitted for review during design development so that King County staff can assess the project's impacts. Please send the sewer extension plans, their modifications and drawings to: Eric Davison, Local Public Agency Administrator King County Wastewater Treatment Division Asset Management 201 South Jackson Street, KSC-NR-0508 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Tel.: (206) 684-1707 eric.davison@kingcounty.gov CREATING RESOURCES FROM WASTEWATER >. Jill K. Ding September 24, 2007 Page 2 • • • King County has a permanent easement for a sewer line on the proposed development site, and we must be assured the right to maintain and repair the sewer line. In the event that the line must be relocated, a new permanent easement must be provided. Please contact Pam Elardo, Permitting Compliance and Property Acquisition Supervisor, regarding the easement. Pam Elardo, Supervisor Permitting Compliance and Property Acquisition King County Wastewater Treatment Division 201 South Jackson Street, KSC-NR-0508 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Tel: (206) 263-3699 pam.elardo@kingcounty.gov Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal. Sincerely, ~ad Sandy Redick Administrative Staff Assistant Environmental Planning & Community Relations Enclosures (3) cc: Eric Davison, Local Public Agency Administrator, Engineering, & Asset Management Pam Elardo, Permitting Compliance and Property Acquisition I) 113 '" 0 -J~­ #""'- .. I;::' ,,' . ;t{MIN"'~'" J~I~' III It II\~ _jt":tJu,a ~-------, \-Ii \ r-/~/(I \1 I lri J ~Gf}" / .5~f"9l~1·o-ZJlr r-J""lf~I.=!~'~· ..... -#J.tt_-O.l5~r 45l3UllT;V ) 1 , 1 .r, / MJ.lRIc!J·16 OFC. ~11~~1 , I ~\ 0/ 1'18 17 ~/ .. "'~/·o.41.1 I I ~. '-\ . .5r-:'L..s~:1ltl ~ ~1 IZ"O '/")1 I I I \ I ' IV ,~t"c;.ft."'a~ MI-U?18-;9 " -~I' . I I ',' 6-r'~: • • ! ! 6TA 6/~ 4, 72 \. . " $TA 6!>#OZ I . Elw5lJ,O tJ 6 p' \ r8-,wel I I / _ 131<'58,216.96 I-J , •• 014 S9 (I. < I "'T-'''' : fr':'-6-r11 6-r"" ~orE'" ~7 ) "'1'1-0021/1 II Ii Ii Iii I! I 1..8 STUBS 10 16 58,5<'3,79 l' ~ ~~\ cC ~I.I I Y"'t~·2'O " / AIIJ~:~a,.) \ .. T ... ~.\50 \'sr",.,,52 N~~"'.8'SO __ ' _ ell -r-J.'I; .y""?·?~'57"~t JI (!~'wV/~,J7 . . \ !';" _ 'I tJ~rU8 '--~ lIpL"/ -. ...,-----•• ;::;:-"........-:. ~?f! . "'1!.l \ \ ~ ·,.,e ' .. t II-IV 4tJ.l ~ .,~ r. -.~ . ~ I t 250.JJ~ I 5 It;'' 4.!f'05; " fA 61",05 . '-. 6-W"-........ ~ ~ [1'r-.. 13.~1 7 -CJ2.t;.:r' ",.1.~o· -" 2 500'---599.<15' -- , ...PI' r-9 r/A/V~' . -L .... B54 ~--s&",l'6 5r~ .. B STu;,~ i-'= -ii, l' /1 w.'1lfHIL'I~ L~~\"J) r-8"STU8 f",.93 "'. \ ~ I' ._1. .~.5. 174 Sr.i. ' _\ _ ,~ ..-4. '1M58-~ ~~ ...., ().}I ~ ~ \':... /. -30· BM t..IMIT(yP/"f'~Io/~;.Ir 't ..... 8 srU8 ~~.. . '\..~-srU8 1'-6Hr~E-......, 6"TL"E LSTA V'ltt1 "'-.. ;,+, 11\':n 111 II~III { -~ ~~ EA<"",,,r-A. \ \ff;:<t,'!o7E:\,t.'ro!~. >~-"""NV4~UI (I.!,.o,,,,,\ !6 0 'H)ii 1 .... ,,1I.U A :r'''6.~ srA.6"60 \ 69.00 r'" ~ f.... ( ~ I \ I -..J. ~..,. r, A5 IJUIl.r 1 . \ I 5'A.~2""~ AS 8UI/.T \ 5'" 6d/~t STA ~'!."'IO AS !Ju/(,r ~.Q~ 9 \..e N T~H ~mt/ " ~ (,I{ I :~. I 1'.... . ,.,---t/f,cgla~l!.,R1 \ \' \., 6J-.o6.9~a;i.T-J \ " ." ,65<-"'0£':"'"7:> ~ S'TA 64<58 ...., ~ ' .. S~4re I-I/W 5r4n/..··W / '-_ '$TA-t,Of'60 04 M.H.RI8-i?O...J , I 'MH RI· I ~ . L.kJmI9lLI-\ \"l"'r! ,\11/11 1';//1'111 I07.,'O!<?t'''''''( 1-1/66033'47 1\ '\1 I '\ ::16~3;~60~e /) I /f]16~~5".:if'.®JY1() ~~ /.___ ---:.---=----__ 5' -:, '-ST. II, 1"/·) tV. I 13 1654,483.29 l? ( \ EJ653,1e6.17 / ) (I EI.~9""6! /" -----1 I" 55,00 Q I I '7 ~ r --:." In 0 I , -' \ ? ~IN I I ~ . \ . 9. "" ~ 'n '6 ~ •• ..0 ~ ~o .. tJ I, 1/,1 /1 II I I .,1 SCALE' HORIZONTAL ," '-50' • 'vER'T'CAL ,",'0' I ,. ( , r / -----c:L~ft1r.~'JV"' r~·""'~J:+.";: ;t-crt.""."-Sf~r~----_. -. "'A~~ ]p;:.."t-<C"''!.#J! .~rn . --,----_ ..... ·1I1'-T:-R. '-~ c ,,!e. e i2I.t' ---, -. 5' -..... _ ~U ~!j!~u'~ff~~l~--:~f; ~~~~#!' ~:~i~ 1"21 te~ '~.J:--r:-:'_-~~:: ?,~P:L~T:-~l".; ?~~_-& )'-~. :J~7~t~ft--~:~:T~';t~-I~~R_-;~~!:::_-~-~_:~~ . u ~----:::~~~: ~~~ ;-o~-l ---t·····-··_' '1\)" ·t i<';,·-··-··"·--·····--·-·-··.-~i,·-a~-=-I~)~ .. -,0, ._. ___ .. __ L_ -----V-3------~--r--~~~. g"Cl, {~; --:,: ~! :'>~i _Ju~Jf%;v~Jfe:, ~e:IBi\, dil?'~;~-t ~!~L:::; ~~gi~fO~~~~-: ~Fu :~~-T-:'-~~ _~;: -C~T :-~'=~ , : oS'. 0'_:: __ <_ .. _ 80 ..JQ.. ---.. L--_:-:~-t~! 'i4-il'~_:-:::!:~'; .-,l0 ~t~c~ I~ .:.:.' \ .... --~+'-:' :;c: "'-l'f~Ji~ !~.~~tf [~lt~;~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~. ~-n4 60 ?--- So 40 1-2. 100 ~ f_c~~~i'i;~~;~,~~Al'""'~~ :t<.c~ci-~~w<~:'~~ti--J~~i:"~:j'~~<~~~~i~iiJ~~=~~JfrLJ'L ,L":-:' _~1C- 90 80 7e 7$ 74 15 76 71 1~ '9 79 ~ HUOJ SOUTH RENTON TRUNK SEWEll 6 I~" L Ai ~ wee e"""M:,,:~:,~:,\~'"N E~:.',N'\::~"'"f" I : r. -. MUNIChPALITY OF7 METROPQ..!--ITAN SEATTLE \ ... _R_2J_8_C .1 RENTON "'" "C' ,""",.. •• ,,, •• ,, ,,, .. ,,,,,, f·,;"" ft;., ,:" .• .', ........ :"".J4>,. .. .... ,' p ~1.~'o.",.(--'A<.I.d"""""J""~"oc:lUl,.2'.l-",ff,ul~'" J 'UL'68l SYSTEM STA.55+00 TO STA.a:!+Oo !"(1I _""1(_ " ''T'' :.q;.,-~ .... ' .• ' ":.J.. e.~,", ,~'~.:-':;';;"' •• "V r 0, -... ::J. (.,.~,~. _ ·.:;r:"O~"''''' ~ ""'~I'""'lL--.~. """ oe", c· ..... _~ AS SHOWN _ ~" -' -...:.-~-. l::' I. 11,1_ -', -" .-_. , ~ __ OJ __ 1_ " '" • • ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION (& PUBLIC HEARING) ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Valley View prollulanal Office PROJECT NUMBER: LUA07.086, SA'H & ECF LOCATION: South 01 S 37th St'Ht, west of 5 38th Court (per~.l 3023059111) DESCRIPTION: The applicant I. requesting Environmental (SEPAl Review for the construction of a 26,600 squa •• loot combination ga"".' office and medlcal/dant.al office building and ... oclldad periling and landscaping Improvements. The prole<;! slta tOlal. 244,807 Iquar. lIMIt (5.8 acres) and Ie ~oned Commercial Offlca (CO). ProJec1 construction would occur on the north portion of the project sUa due to Bleep slopH •• clase 2 stream .• cat"llory 2 wetland, and a category 3 wetland occupying the south ponlon of the project site. A Class 2 stream requlras a. iOn-foot buffer, a category 2 wllliand requl ... a 5O-foot buffer and a category 3 wltland requlraa a 2Sofoot buffer. Primary acee .. to the site would be provided off of S 38th coun. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Apf)6llls of Ihe environmental dlllerminallon musl be flied In writing on or beto .. 5:00 PM on October 1, 2007. Appeals must be flied In writing loglllher with Ihe required $75.00 application fee wilh: Hearing E.amlner, City of Renlon, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals 10 tile fumlner are govem.d by City of Renton Municipal Code Secllon 4-8-110.B. Addltlonsllnformatlon r&gardlng the appeal process may be oblalned from the Rantan City Clark'. OffiCI, (425) 43Q.6510 A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON OCTOBER 9, 2007 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SITE PLAN. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. , DEVELOPMENT CERTIFICATION I, )e.TH ~ , hereby certify that -..<7=-:-copies of the above document were posted by me in ~ conspicuous places or nearby the described property on",,\l.\\II\\111 s"',?-\.. YNN /y.'II/ ~~<? ,,,,,,..,-t-,'1I11 1 Qt.!lll DA TE:_1.:....:·"-<'4f_4[....1....-__ -_ .......... ';. J )J,~ .'~I:II. ,I{\. ~ / ...... -r-<;' .",.,~~f<~.\~ ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and forthe State of Washington residini"in i V • _ -:~f '%.~ ~ (.o~..., .. ~ z..-l\o}. -'I--'~" ~tyf-~/... ~"l""" = ,onthe I dayof ~~ '{ NOTAR Y PUBLIC SIG"': I \ ,,""6'" ~ -'11, 'A S\4\~·,.:::--;::-- Iln\\ . ,v .. <.: ... , SIGNED: , .. . . ~athYKeOlker.Mayor . . ,September13,'2007 . ' ' .'" . Dr, DanieLO'Brien . 400 S 38 i? Cal.lrt· .. . ' Rentan; WA 98055 " 'RE:'Valley Vie'N prafessia~aLOffice Comments' CIT~F·.REN!(jN • piilnning/BuildingIPublicW orks Department .. Gregg::Z;immerman P.E;,.Admin.istrator '" I II '. ! ~orL-V-A 01-O~lD ~e,J \ ou) " .f.'le ",. ," '".-. .. ,.IL----.-----c~~___:___---:-~J·" ;~. ,: " ",' " . , -."' .. ,'. Tha.rikYau far t~ecOmment letteryi>u sentdat~d Augti~t 29: 2007regaidin~ the Valley >'.' . " ·.Viewprofe~sional Office~ :Vaur)et~ei hasb~en: included in ihe afficial fiie and Y9u hav-e· , beenmadeapaityofrecard,fadhisproj~c~,' .. ..' . -" .. >',Iri· y~urlette;yauexpre:s;io~66~ *{ihi~g~~d~ t~!rat'fi~ 'an S'3S ih yourt during 'the , ..•• " I . -_.' :...... ~ansmictiaIiphiise of ~eprojt;ct and fire. dep8rtmentaccess~ A resirie,tive ca-iierilmt was ' . ,";. ," .' . '.' " :; ;' --",- : f''''·" " . . : recorded an the pf(;pertytesirlcting-iicc'e~sio'ihepr9pertyta-S3.8:tli .C6Urt:Agated· •. ·.····: .. _ . ~~condru:yaecesshas. been i)lcluded 911 tg~ ~plimi;speCificaIIy f\lr fife deparime!1tacces~ '. . .;: ,. Off of S:37'h Stiee(;Canstruttion· haulri>ute-swil!,bereviewed at a'later date inider the' '.- ':' , , , ' :' ' , • , ,~ " "" ... ," " "" ( , I '" ,,' ' ',' ; .. "." _ .' ,,'" '. ,,' ,,' ~, .. ' , ;," . '"'' " . •. ·.bl1ildingpermit.review,l1oWever·based',Oli.the r~stri,ctive caveriantthat.ha:s.b~en.recarded .. ' '.·a~e~thepraiei1yit da,esri.o~app~§.rlikeIY~hatconstiuc.tiol1.ti-affic wil!bep~rn1ittedto:' . , __ ''-utilIze. S 3') Street. .. '. " . . .. ' ..., ' .. ' . ";, . , '< :. '" .. '·'Ap.tiblic.heimngis:t(ll1ti1ti~eIYsche4ul~4forOctabei9, 2007 taCansider iheSite Plan .' .••. . appraval far th~ VaJleyYiew Prafessiot1~rbffice,:r-hfr4earing willbe:heId'at9:00ilmiIl , . .. ' . the CitYCoQI1ciiChamhe~s,6n:the7'hflobtof GityHall; y~uniaywish to. attend ahd .' . -." ....• testify,If yo.u4ave a~yfurt~er9-uesti?ns; reel freetac,~ntact me~t (425) 430-7219, I '. -. Sin6erely, '. .' '. "'J. ;.,." .. -, " ,_.- . , .. ' ,'. " . . '\' . . ..... ." "'. '. ;" -'-,'\ . ',', '. -.... :., ' .. ,_.:: . . . ,." '".\,' ". '. ; -', ::.,' . , -','.: :' .. ,' .. :-.. .,-----'-"-,--~.--'-o-'-. -. ~ .. ~.:":-:. ~""~. ~ .•. ' --,---,.~~-'-'---.. , .. '~R,,, E-, "N T' -0' N:-' ," . J(i55Soutli'GfadyW~Y~Rerit;,ti, W.ishi~gton9805T " ." .. ' . .' .; :l*}:'~is~'a~_~~~~i~s'56~o;~"~ecima~nal;30o/~"~~st~~~~~~~r " ,', ':,A.~~E'A'D '"OF: ,TfLE i cu-,~~.~ .. '.-" '" : :.!.~ ' . .-. . ".'. ... " ------------------------------- City canton Department of Planning / Building / pU.Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: plan 'D.OJ. i'v.-J COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 30, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA07-086, SA-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 16, 2007 CIlYOF""NIUN APPLICANT: Valley View Professional Development LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Ding R E eEl V t: u PROJECT TITLE: Valley View Professional Office PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian AUG 2 2 2007 SITE AREA: 244,807 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): 26,600 square feet '" LOCATION: S of S 37'h Street, W of S 38 th Street (3023059111) I WORK ORDER NO: 77793 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a 26,600 square foot combination general office and medicalldental office building and associated parking and landscaping improvements. The project site totals 244,807 square feet (5.6 acres) and is zoned Commercial Office (CO). Project construction would occur on the north portion of the project site due to steep slopes, a class 2 stream, a category 2 wetland, and a category 3 wetland ocupying the south portion of the project site. A class 2 stream requires a 100-foot buffer, a category 2 wetland requires a 50-foot buffer and a category 3 wetland requires a 25-foot buffer. Primary access to the site would be provided off of S 38th Court. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earlh Housin Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transporlation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airporl Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Date DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: • CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM September 5, 2007 Jill Ding Jan lilian X7216 • Valley View Professional Development LUA 07-086 S. 38'h Street and Talbot Road S. I have reviewed the application for Valley View Professional Office located near S. 38 th Street and Talbot Rd and have the following comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER SEWER STORM STREETS There is an existing 12-inch water main in S. 38 th Street. This main extends through the site to the south where it connects to an existing 12-inch located on the hospital site. Available derated fire flow in the area is approximately 4,000 gpm. Pressure available is approximately 112 psi. A pressure-reducing valve will be required to be installed on the domestic water meter. There is a 6-inch water main in S.37'h Street. Available derated fire flow from the 6-inch main is 1,300 gpm. There is a 15-inch Metro sewer transmission line located along the north property line that runs east and west along S. 37'h Street. Applicant has shown a connection to this sewer main. 11 frontage fee will be required to be paid for connection to Metro's sewer. There are existing storm drainage facilities in S. 37'h Street and S. 38'h Street. There are no street improvements in S. 37'h Street. CODE REOUIREMENTS WATER 1. The Water System Development Charges are based on a rate of $0.273 x the total square feet of the building site. Estimated fees based on the entire site plan is $ 67,000. (244,807 sq.feet x $0.273). Payment of fees will be required prior to issuance of building permit. Square footage of wetlands may be exempt from system development fee calculations. Applicant will need to identifY square footage of-wetlands. 2. Preliminary fire flow required by the fire department is 2,000 gpm. Two hydrants are required to serve this site. One hydrant shall be within 150 feet and one additional shall be within 300 feet of the structure. 3. Existing hydrants approved to be counted as fire protection shall be retrofitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting if not already installed. Note on plan if required. Show locations of all existing hydrants. Valley View Professional Center Page 2 014 • 4. A water main extension is required on site. -----1 • 5. A fire sprinkler system is required. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly to the fire sprinkler systems. All devices installed shall be per the latest Department of Health "Approved List" of Backflow Prevention Devices. Civil plans show location of device and should note: "Separate plans and utility permit for DDCVA installation for Fire Sprinkler System will be required". For DDCV A installations inside the building, applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing the location and installation of the backflow assembly inside the mechanical room. Installation shall be in accordance with the City of Renton's requirements. DDCV A shall be installed immediately after the pipe has passed through the building floor slab. Installation of devices shall be in the horizontal position only. 6. Landscape irrigation systems will require a separate permit for the irrigation meter and approved backflow device is required to be installed. A plumbing permit will be required. 7. Buildings that exceed 30 feet in height will require a back flow device to be installed on domestic water meter. 8. A Reduced Pressure Backflow Assembly (RPBA) will be required to be installed with the 3-inch domestic compound water meter. SANITARY SEWER I. The Sewer System Development Charges are based on a rate of $0.142 x the total square feet of the building site. Estimated fees based on the entire site plan is $35,000. (244,807 sq. feet x $0.142). Payment of fees will be required prior to issuance of building permit. Square footage of wetlands may be exempt from system development fee calculations. Applicant will need to identify square footage of wetlands. 1. If food preparation facilities are proposed, a grease trap or grease interceptor will be required. It is not apparent on the plans provided. 2. Parking garage will require floor drains by the building department and shall be connected to the sanitary sewer system. Flows shall be directed through floor drains that are installed in accordance with the Uniform Plumbing Code to an interior or exterior oil/water separator. The separator shall be sized to meet a minimum IS-minute retention time for peak flows anticipated in the garage area, but in no case will be less than 200 gallons of storage capacity. The type of interceptor shall be as manufactured by Pipe inc., Utility Vault Inc., or approved equal. The oil/water separator and sizing calculations shall be shown on the civil drawings. 3. Side sewer shall be a minimum of2% slope. SURFACE WATER I. The Surface Water System Development Charges are based on a rate of $0.265 x the total square feet of the new impervious surface area of the site. Payment of fees will be required prior to issuance of building permit. I. A drainage report from Exceltech Consulting dated JulyI6, 2007 has been submitted. Preliminary review indicates the report addresses detention and water quality in accordance with the 2005 King County Surface Water Manual. 3. Separate structural plans will be required to be submitted for review and approval under a building permit for the proposed underground vault. Special inspection from the building department will be required. 2 Valley View Professional Center Page 3 of 4 • • 4. Erosion control shall comply with Department of Ecology's most current Stormwater Management Manual. TRANSPORTATION I. Requirements to improve and dedicate additional right of way in S.37" Street has been waived by an administrative decision approved by Neil Watts, Director of Development Services. 2. Primary access to the site will be from the existing private roadway in S. 38 th Street. Secondary access will be from S. 37'h Street. Access driveway from S.37'h will be gated. 3. A traffic analysis has been submitted and is currently under review. Preliminary review indicates no adverse impacts or improvements in Talbot Road will be required as a part of this development. MISCELLANEOUS I. Construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. 2. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3. Any rockeries or retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height to be builtd during construction of utilities requires a separate building permit submittal with structural calculations and shall have the following separate note shall be included on the civil plan: "A licensed engineer with geo-technical expertise must be retained for proposed rockeries greater than four feet in height. The engineer must monitor rockery construction and verify in writing that the rockery was constructed in general accordance with ARC standards and with hislher supplemental recommendations, in a professional manner and of competent and suitable material. PLAN REVIEW -GENERAL I. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards 2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 3. Separate permits for side sewer, domestic water meter, landscape irrigation meter, and any backflow devices will be required. 4. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate and application fee shall be submitted at the sixth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check, it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for securing all necessary easements for utilities. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS I. Estimated traffic mitigation fees based on the TIA submitted by Mirai Transportation will be $45,825.00. This is based on 611 trips x $75.00. See attached Mitigation Fee Report. Payment of fees will be required prior to issuance of building permit. 2. Staff recommends a SEPA condition requiring this project to design and comply with Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume II of the lastest edition of Stormwater Management Manual. 3 , ' 'Valley View Professional Center Page 4 of 4 • • 3. Staff recommends a SEPA condition requiring this project to comply with the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual to meet both detention (Conservation Flow control -a.k.a. Level 2) and water quality improvements. 4. A fence shall be constructed along the north end of the site. cc: Kayren Kittrick 4 ,----------------------------------------------------------------------- Cityo.nton Department of Planning / Building / pu&orks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Tr COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 30, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA07-086, SA-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED' AUGUST 16 2009EV'§LOPMENl SERVICES . , APPLICANT: Valle View Professional Develo ment LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Din PROJECT TITLE: Valle View Professional Office PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 244,807 s uare feet BUILDING AREA ross: 26,600 s uare fee LOCATION: S of S 37'h Street, W of S 38'h Street (3023059111) I WORK ORDER NO: 77793 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a 26,600 square foot combination general office and medical/dental office building and associated parking and landscaping improvements. The project site totals 244,807 square feet (5.6 acres) and is zoned Commercial Office (CO). Project construction would occur on the north portion of the project site due to steep slopes, a class 2 stream, a category 2 wetland, and a category 3 wetland ocupying the south portion of the project site. A class 2 stream requires a 100-foot buffer, a category 2 wetland requires a 50-foot buffer and a category 3 wetland requires a 25-foot buffer. Primary access to the site would be provided off of S 38th Court. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Housina Aesthetics U htlG/are Recreation Utilities Trans rtation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airporl Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Probable Probable Minor Major Impacts Impacts ~ -IYC<~{~ ~~'1 ~c. -1h~ KS More Information Necessary We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areBS of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ------------------------------- i.K~yren KittriQt.~,JJ.~iiig:orta~2n:r;1iii~iO~ Fe;J!~c-=:: *,=,,:_:::: :::::=~~---'::::.=.".::::::' ~~.: .. ::.::' :::1igiD -• ~---------~ Project Name: Project Address: Contact Person: Permit Number: Project Description: Land Use Type: D Residential D Retail )!"'Non-retail Calculation: lRn ~'1 Vi PD LA.v Method of Calculation: D ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition )"Traffic Study D Other M\I2.A\ ~G '6/r/ ~ [P\\ ~ ~ 15.". ~ L\ Sj S~S. lTD • r . ~ DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: • CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM September 5, 2007 Jill Ding Jan Illian x7216 • Valley View Professional Development LUA 07-086 S. 381h Street and Talbot Road S. I have reviewed the application for Valley View Professional Office located near S. 38 th Street and Talbot Rd and have the following comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER SEWER STORM STREETS There is an existing 12-inch water main in S. 38 th Street. This main extends through the site to the south where it connects to an existing 12-inch located on the hospital site. Available derated tire flow in the area is approximately 4,000 gpm. Pressure available is approximately 112 psi. A pressure-reducing valve will be required to be installed on the domestic water meter. There is a 6-inch water main in S.371h Street. Available derated fire flow from the 6-inch main is 1,300 gpm. There is a IS-inch Metro sewer transmission line located along the north property line that runs east and west along S. 37 th Street. Applicant has shown a connection to this sewer main. A frontage fee will be required to be paid for connection to Metro's sewer. There are existing storm drainage facilities in S. 37 th Street and S. 38 th Street. There are no street improvements in S. 37 th Street. CODE REOUIREMENTS WATER I. The Water System Development Charges are based on a rate of $0.273 x the total square feet of the building site. Estimated fees based on the entire site plan is $ 67.000. (244,807 sq.feet x $0.273). Payment of fees will be required prior to issuance of building permit. Square footage of wetlands may be exempt from system development fee calculations. Applicant will need to identify square footage of wetlands. 2. Preliminary fire flow required by the fire department is 2,000 gpm. Two hydrants are required to serve this site. One hydrant shall be within ISO feet and one additional shall be within 300 feet of the structure. 3. Existing hydrants approved to be counted as fire protection shall be retrofitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting if not already installed. Note on plan if required. Show locations of all existing hydrants. Valley View Professional Center Page 2 of 4 • 4. A water main extension is required on site. ------------------~ • 5. A fire sprinkler system is required. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly to the fire sprinkler systems. All devices installed shall be per the latest Department of Health "Approved List" of Backflow Prevention Devices. Civil plans show location of device and should note: "Separate plans and utility permit for nncv A installation for Fire Sprinkler System will be required". For DDCV A installations inside the building, applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing the location and installation of the backflow assembly inside the mechanical room. Installation shall be in accordance with the City of Renton's requirements. DDCVA shall be installed immediately after the pipe has passed through the building floor slab. Installation of devices shall be in the horizontal position only. 6. Landscape irrigation systems will require a separate permit for the irrigation meter and approved backflow device is required to be installed. A plumbing permit will be required. 7. Buildings that exceed 30 feet in height will require a backflow device to be installed on domestic water meter. 8. A Reduced Pressure Backflow Assembly (RPBA) will be required to be installed with the 3-inch domestic compound water meter. SANITARY SEWER I. The Sewer System Development Charges are based on a rate of $0.142 x the total square feet of the building site. Estimated fees based on the entire site plan is $35,000. (244,807 sq. feet x $0.142). Payment of fees will be required prior to issuance of building permit. Square footage of wetlands may be exempt from system development fee calculations. Applicant will need to identify square footage of wetlands. 2. If food preparation facilities are proposed, a grease trap or grease interceptor will be required. It is not apparent on the plans provided. 3. Parking garage will require floor drains by the building department and shall be connected to the sanitary sewer system. Flows shall be directed through floor drains that are installed in accordance with the Uniform Plumbing Code to an interior or exterior oil/water separator. The separator shall be sized to meet a minimum IS-minute retention time for peak flows anticipated in the garage area, but in no case will be less than 200 gallons of storage capacity. The type of interceptor shall be as manufactured by Pipe Inc., Utility Vault Inc., or approved equal. The oil/water separator and sizing calculations shall be shown on the civil drawings. 4. Side sewer shall be a minimum of 2% slope. SURFACE WATER I. The Surface Water System Development Charges are based on a rate of $0.265 x the total square feet of the new impervious surface area of the site. Payment of fees will be required prior to issuance of building permit. 2. A drainage report from Exceltech Consulting dated Julyl6, 2007 has been submitted. Preliminary review indicates the report addresses detention and water quality in accordance with the 2005 King County Surface Water Manual. 3. Separate structural plans will be required to be submitted for review and approval under a building permit for the proposed underground vault. Special inspection from the building department will be required. 2 .. , \{alley View Professional Center Page 3 of 4 • • 4. Erosion control shall comply with Department of Ecology's most current Stonnwater Management Manual. TRANSPORTATION I. Requirements to improve and dedicate additional right of way in S.37" Street has been waived by an administrative decision approved by Neil Watts, Director of Development Services. 2. Primary access to the site will be from the existing private roadway in S. 38 th Street. Secondary access will be from S. 37'h Street. Access driveway from S.37" will be gated. 3. A traffic analysis has been submitted and is currently under review. Preliminary review indicates no adverse impacts or improvements in Talbot Road will be required as a part of this development. MISCELLANEOUS I. Construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. 2. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3. Any rockeries or retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height to be builtd during construction of utilities requires a separate building permit submittal with structural calculations and shall have the following separate note shall be included on the civil plan: "A licensed engineer with geo-technical expertise must be retained for proposed rockeries greater than four feet in height. The engineer must monitor rockery construction and verify in writing that the rockery was constructed in general accordance with ARC standards and with his/her supplemental recommendations, in a professional manner and of competent and suitable material. PLAN REVIEW -GENERAL I. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards 2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 3. Separate permits for side sewer, domestic water meter, landscape irrigation meter, and any backflow devices will be required. 4. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate and application fee shall be submitted at the sixth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check, it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for securing all necessary easements for utilities. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS I. Estimated traffic mitigation fees based on the TIA submitted by Mirai Transportation will be $45,825.00. This is based on 611 trips x $75.00. See attached Mitigation Fee Report. Payment of fees will be required prior to issuance of building permit. 2. Staff recommends a SEPA condition requiring this project to design and comply with Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume II of the latest edition of Stormwater Management Manual. 3 Valley View Professional Center . • ' Page4of4 • • 3. Staff recommends a SEPA condition requiring this project to comply with the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual to meet both detention (Conservation Flow control-a.k.a. Level 2) and water quality improvements. 4. A fence shall be constructed along the north end of the site. cc: Kayren Kittrick 4 ';; -".~, City o.nton Department of Plan~ing / Building / pu~orks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: F"\ re... COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 30, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA07-086, SA-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 16, 2007 APPLICANT: Vallev View Professional Development LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Ding PROJECT TITLE: Valley View Professional Office PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 244,807 square feet BUILDING AREA (aross): 26,600 square feet LOCATION: S of S 37'h Street, W of S 38 th Street (3023059111) I WORK ORDER NO: 77793 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a 26,600 square foot combination general office and medical/dental office building and associated parking and landscaping improvements. The project site totals 244,807 square feet (5.6 acres) and is zoned Commercial Office (CO). Project construction would occur on the north portion of the project site due to steep slopes, a class 2 stream, a category 2 wetland, and a category 3 wetland ocupying the south portion of the project site. A class 2 stream requires a 100-foot buffer, a category 2 wetland requires a 50-foot buffer and a category 3 wetland requires a 25-foot buffer. Primary access to the site would be provided off of S 38th Court. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth I Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals ~ .~. Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources A:~gggF~et B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. (!~ tAJ~ 8/2-{/07 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ~---------------- DATE: TO: FROM: • • CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM August 21, 2007 Jill Ding, Associate Planner Camille Walls, Acting Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Project -Valley View Professional Office, 400 Blk S 37th Street MITIGATION ITEMS; 1. A fire mitigation fee of $ 13,832 is required based on $.52 per square foot of the building square footage, minus the parking area. FIRE CODE REOUIREMENTS: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 2,000 GPM, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. 2. Separate plans and permit are required for the installation of systems. 3. Fire Department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20 in width with a turning radius of 45 foot outside and a5 foot inside. 4. Fire department dead-end access roadways over 150 feet in length are required to have an approved turnaround. A turn around will be required at the northwest end of the building. 5. A site plan for Pre-Fire planning is required to be submitted for your project. This shall be submitted prior to occupancy in one of the attached formats. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. , . • • I PRE-FIRE PLANNING I RENTON FIRE DEPARTMENT In an effort to streamline our pre-fire process, we are requesting that you submit a site plan of your construction project in one of the following formats which we can then convert to vrSrO.vsd. This is required to be submitted prior to occupancy. ABC Flowcharter.af3 ABC F1owcharter.af2 Adobe Illustrator File.ai AutoCad Drawing.dwg AutoCad Drawing.dgn Computer Graphics Metafile.cgm Corel Clipart Format.cmx Corel DRAW! Drawing File Format.edr Corel Flow.cft Encapsulated Postscript File.eps Enhanced Metafile.emf IGES Drawing File Format.igs Graphics Interchange Format.gif Macintosh prCT Format.pct Micrografx Designer Ver 3.l.drw Micrografx Designer Ver 6.0.dsf Microstation Drawing.dgn Portable Network Graphics Format.pnf Postscript File.ps Tag Image File Formattif Texttxt Text.csv VISIO.vsd Windows Bitmap.bmp Windows Bitmap.dib Windows Metafile.wmf Zsoft PC Paintbrush Bitmap.pcx • • • . FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU x '1~(;-q30-7oo0 = \ ,------------------------------------------------------------------------------ •• • CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 2nd day of October, 2007, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Binh Nguyen, Valley View Professional Dev., LLC Owner/ApplicanVContact Edna M. Remy POR Stephanie Ryan POR Bonnie Victor POR Victoria Lerner POR Dr. Daniel O'Brien POR J. Carlos Santuario POR ~ A. __ , ~ ~"""\\\\.'i$ (Signature of Sender):.! < ~ S'''::C:i.oN 4. ,~;!t, .: ':F'; ... ~'U'A'HI~>-.'II STATE OF WASHINGTON ) = /""!!>sION,.~,,,-s.~ :: =ooJl ~o T -'I,,;> '0"," ~ ) S5 ~ fo .J-~~ ~ -~ -• _ rn~ ~ COUNTY OF KING ) ~~~ -<> U>j E ~'" I.JBlIO =-~~ "" .. >/' fJ. :~ -I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker ~~'I~II;{'il-09",<-':....off signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for t~b,~S"tl~Al.!1:4,~~,..:-' purposes mentioned in the instrument. hI 1\\\\"" Dated: /O/~!ZOQ7 rl e tate of Washington Notary (print):_~,.u..."-==--'=='-'::::...L---W'-'---"s:""e-~f1z~'-------­ My appointment expires: , Project Name: Valley View Professional Office Project Number: LUA07-086, SA-H, ECF . '" e·' Kathy Ke~lker, Mayor . October 2,2007 Binh Nguyeri . '.' . . , , Val1eyView Professional Development, LLC '·607 SW Grady Way #210 Renton, WA 98057 SUBJECT: ValleyYiew P~ofessio~al Office LUA07-086; SA-H, ECF . . . . .' . . Dear Mr. Nguyen: . CITVe>F RENTON.' Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.; Adminlstniioi Th;s:letteri~ to inform. you that the appeal period ended Oct~ber I, 2007. fortheEnvironment~1 Review <::;ommittee's '(ERC) Determination· or Non-Significance-Mitigated for the abo"e- . referencedpt6ject. ' , ',.' . • ' .' ,-" ~"-'-' .,' _: • " • • ... ". -,":' --' ,. _. .' ,.' : • , " .-, "" Or-' • • • • • : " '. '\' No appeals were. filed on theERC determiriation, therefore, this de<;ision ,is final. The applicant . mus(cdrriply ,wlth\ al1ERGMitigation Measures. outlined in .' th~' Report 'ana Decision dated. SeptemberI0,f007, AHearlng1j;xamlnerPubliC Heii'ringhas.b~enschedule4 for Oct{)b~r 9,2007; where Site 'Plan C()nditionsmilY be\ssued; :The applicant>or representative(sjof .the applicant are required to be present, Ericlosedjs a copy of theI'relimiriary Repprt to the Hearing Examinerfor y6urreview ...•. :. . ... ," . ' ... If you have any: qUestions,'please' feel free to contact ~e at:( 425) 430-7219: .' C",' -~ -'.' " " . " • . • . ~' ; .... ,,' ' ... -. '.' '.',: -' -. .. . ~ : FortheEnvironmenta1.Review'Conuhittee, : ' . • " " -, • .' -,' :","', ., < , .., • • ~""'" "---1/<7.: , '. n'd/0-V' Jill K.Ding, ' .....•. ',' . . Senior Planner . .' . Enclosure. .' -,' ' .... ' 'cc: .. ',],Carlos Sant~ario, Dr-Daniel O'Brieri', Victoria Lerner, Bonnie Vi~tm,Siep~ni<; Ryan, Edna ivLRemy I Parties of J!,e9ord' '. .. . '. . . .. . . . , . CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING October 9, 2007 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 AM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7TH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL The application(s) listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PROJECT NAME: Honeybrook Circle Division II Preliminary Plat PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-07-085, PP, ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Application for Preliminary Plat approval for a 26-lot plat in the R-8 zone. Subject site is 4.12 acres (plus 2.5 acres for Division I) located on the south side of NE 8th Street between Field Place NE and Hoquiam Avenue NE. The existing home will be removed. Proposed lots will range from 4,500 sf to 9,368 sf, with a density of 8.0 dwelling units/acre. Access to the new lots will be from new internal public streets that will connect with the adjacent Honeybrook Circle Plat, to the south. A half street, NE 8th Street, will be constructed on the north property line. Field Avenue and Graham Avenue will be constructed on the south side of the plat. Drainage facilities for this plat will be combined with the drainage vault in the adjacent Honeybrook Circle Division I plat. There are 262 significant trees onsite, and no reported critical areas. PROJECT NAME: Valley View Professional Office PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-07-086, SA-H, ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for the construction of a 26,600 square foot combination general office and medical/dental office building and associated parking and landscaping improvements. The proposed building would be 2-stories over an underground parking garage with a height of 25 feet. A total of 88 parking spaces would be provided onsite, 34 of those spaces would be located within the parking garage the remainder would be surface parking spaces. The project site totals 244,807 square feet (5.6 acres) and is zoned Commercial Office (CO). Project construction would occur on the north portion of the project site due to steep slopes, a class 2 stream, a category 2 wetland, and a category 3 wetland occupying the south portion of the project site. A class 2 stream requires a 100-foot buffer, a category 2 wetland requires a 50-foot buffer and a category 3 wetland requires a 25-foot buffer. Primary access to the site would be provided off of S 38th Court. HEX Agenda 10-9-07.doc , , , , , ;1 ~ , , , • -• ~ ,; " " ! g ~ is • :::- ~ ~ is · :::- I, ~ ~ 133HB 1:::131\00 ill-SS-ddd I . --- SSOB6 N01~NIHSVM 'N01N3M 133~lS HIL£ Hinos XXV lN3l"id013113C 301~O lVNOISS3"IOlld M3111 A311V II 1111 HH , / '11;·i ! Ii i!i! !Ilil! . '!"Ii l ,ill ! / I , / i 'jl i I. Ii ! ! i Ii' ., i I . , , , I" I' L I ~ ~ ~ --,' II i' ~ . ~~ .,I i i i' II nun ;1 IiI I 'I ,i • i~ ! i Ii II " t:: i • ~ !l • 1'1' • ! I' qqll ~ I :1 'II Ij II II I' 'I' I' i q I hi Ii II .ilil ;; IIi III Iii II , II "II' !I Ii ;,11 ! .b, l-II 5 t i!1o I ! Ii ! I " -! -j! iii I Li : . " 'I -II I Ii I ! i ! i., j I! --I! II ,., !ilihi!i Ii lid iI hI! 'II Ii' II I III! !>Ii I rn T ~ !~. Iii- ~ $OGCl} ~"Z'-l :;l~ .. 81~";" Ell! ~!H • "I ,'I! g I !Ii 61 .. PI_ ''Yd ...... ''"''!l u,,'!1 ~~ I::?I -.. , " ~ "I4oa_~I'N/O~ NOJ.NID[ ~ -dO All::> -------- " is g ~ 5 .. - . I I , . , /: SS096 N018NIHSVM 'N01N3M 133MIS H1L£ HInOS XXV lN3rld013113C 301~~O lVNOISS3~Ol:ld M3111 A311V II .9· .. · __ ~---·h_. '. \ ] I Ii] II II ~ • • • • • ~ , !! Zz ..... Q ~~ = = W ...... ::: tz~ (W'>. W UlLL -20 (D (.) ~§ a w a: ~ " SSOB6 NOWNIHSVM 'NOIN]~ 1331:11S HlL£ Hinos XXV ~d013113a 3:Jld"IO lVNOISS3.dOIjd M3IA A31lV II f :- I !;; ;' ~,/J / ! , , I -" ''/ ;1// //.,' /,,~C)/, / i/ .'!/ / /1,\': / /1 / //P ;' ! I -! ".' / .' i i .! ..... / / :fi'f /,/// ////./ ,: :' " ,I! /.: / ,./ i .. _-_ .. -------------- .------------------------------------ S~096 NO!f>NIHSVM 'NOIN3~ ~ a:~ C! I I33~IS HIL£ HInDS XXv ~ r QS s '<t Ii] ~d013113(] 3:lI±lO °000::< ~ .. 0 rl~ ~~~~~ II 1"'NOISS3~O~d M3111 A31lV II ~ ! uo:n 11.1 IUl 'I ~ Zz \;;; C • ~~ = LU ...... > • !z~ . ("'I -• W .1 wu. -!: • 20 .U) (,) 11.?; . ::;) w ! , o . mo < a: a • ! ~ I ! :0 ~ m ~ ,. ·Q6 ffi . =<"'CI Oil: ."m -~ ~ c ~ ift~ a~ Zz ~ ~ -1 0 'c ,. Ii/X gj I ~ I g I ~. » .t~ -~ ! [II ~I II ~ I~ ~-~n II ii II II rri"",1 II II II II II II II II II II II II II II 1J--1---l-l'\-l\lIL ~~~ ~ ~, oo~ 'I ~I ~r~ ~.~i 5 ~ . 'I' ~~ I ! "I ~ • ~ ,'~ 'AA~ '" !~I .~I ' . ! 'i' I' OH'-W-II ~ ~.,,', '----] "1[-;---' ,---oj ,\ , , " I, .\ I 'I § . /.,! fl{ ,--~ l~ ;L iii ID I'~ . iii : V ~ ';:'::v 'I' " I I,', " \ ' I " I, , ~.....,;.-. ---' ~ __ -~I i il il ~ I~ i i Ii il ,l ~I .~ b VALLEY VIEW PROFESSIONAL OFACE DEVELOPMENT 4XX SOUTH 37TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 Ii'I ~I h ,0 -°11 ~ -ileem !kJ 'il 1 tl i St. il II II II s: [I ~ ~H-----I E g ;;-----___ 1 := M AI , <E U CA ""'--'-'-'! __ ". __ .1 __ _ CA l.. \. \ ' " n' Cl ZONING PIBIPW TlICIINICAL BBIlV1C1!8 02l28I07 G3 • 19 T23N R5E E 112 R-l \ \ \, R-8 177th Ave: SE I3 • 31 T23N R5E E 112 -- - -BentoD dlt, LImI~ R-8 o :00 .00 lJ4800 -IT R-IO H3 30 T23N RSE E 112 5330 -------------- • CITY OF RENTON • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUA07-086, SA-H & ECF Binh Nguyen Valley View Professional Development, LLC 607 SW Grady Way, ste 210 Renton, WA 98057 Valley View Professional Office DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a 26,600 square foot combination general office and medical/dental office building and associated parking and landscaping improvements. The project site totals 244,807 square feet (5.6 acres) and is zoned Commercial Office (CO). Project construction would occur on the north portion of the project site due to steep slopes, a class 2 stream, a category 2 wetland, and a category 3 wetland occupying the south portion of the project site. A class 2 stream requires a 100-foot buffer, a category 2 wetland requires a 50-foot buffer and a category 3 wetland requires a 25-foot buffer. Primary access to the site would be provided off of S 38th Court. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: South of S 37th Street, west of S 38th Court (parcel 3023059111) The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section 1. Project construction shall comply with the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report prepared by GEO Group Northwest, Inc. (dated December 6, 2006). 2. Erosion control shall be installed and maintained during construction in accordance with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements as outlined in the 2005 Storm water Management Manual. 3. The storm water detention system for this project shall be designed to comply with the requirements found in the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual to meet both detention (Conservation Flow control -a.k.a. Level 2) and water quality improvements. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 for each new average weekday trip attributable to the project prior to the issuance of building permits. This fee is currently estimated at $46,425.00. 5. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new commercial building area prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee is estimated at $13,832.00. ERe Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 ,-----------------------c--------- :lANIEL O'BRIEN, DDS, MS • September 20, 2007 Ms. Jill K. Ding, Senior Planner City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, W A 98057 RE: Valley V iew Professional Office File #LUA07-086 Dear Ms. Ding: . • 1. P'EDIATRIC DE.NTISTRY Diplomat. American A('adcmy of PediHtrit~ Dcn~istry --------------- Thank you for your professional and informative letter of September 13 in which you discussed the restrictive access from the subject property to S. 37'h Street. During the construction phase of our adjacent property in 1984, even though it is a much smaller project (remodel of an existing vintage structure), the city and fire department did allow an alternate access to S. 37'h because of the extreme difficulty in backing up semi's and other large construction trucks out of a busy street such as S. 38'h Court with parking on both sides. Due to the overflow of the employee hospital parking, S. 38'h Court is. normally full on both sides of the street. In addition, illegal parking occurs every day on Talbot, too close to the intersection, which makes it impossible to see traffic coming north on Talbot at a high rate of speed. A temporary construction access to S. 37'h Street must be provided and later a gate for fire access could be put up at the conclusion of construction: Otherwise; I'm afraid that it is just not feasible for construction trucks to be expected to back out or try to turn around to exit along S. 38'h Court, particularly with cars parked on both sides of the street. Medic'al offices on both sides of38'h Court should not be expected to be restricted in parking ?r access during the construction period. I believe there was a sunset c1au~e on the ~estrictive covenant not allowing access to S. 37'h Street. Do you know what that date is? This property is located in a major medical park associated with Valley Medical Center, and eventual egress to S. 37'h should be part of the long term plan for this medical park. In the original improvement to S. 38'h Court in 1984, our property was one of four parcels in the medical park which paid for the development of the sidewalks, utilities and paving of the street. The street is now, of course, owned by Renton. The asphalt surface is starting to break down. in places where there are significant cracks and porosities in the asphalt. I' can only expect that during a season of construction with heavy trucks, this road will break apart significantly and some repair should be planned for the surface of this road, in whole or apart, after the construction of this new 26,000 sq. ft. office building. This street has not yet been subject to excavating equipment or high gross vehicle weight trucks such as will be necessary in the construction of a significant project such as ·this. Once again, I am delighted that the developer is stepping forward to do this project arid we will be happy to cooperate in any way possible as a neighbor: However, I think it's vital that a better plan be put forward to mitigate the traffic and construction impact toS. 38'h Court. I would welcome the opportunity to meet with you to walk the property and discuss the construction access problem. Daniel N. O'Brien,'D.b.S;, M.S.D. Owner .' ; I " - 400 S. 38'h Court , ., " . , " '. • , • ,~~ I '; : ' : I· 400 South 38th Court, Suite A Renton, WA· 98055 425·255·6008 -',J :. ':. " .,' . • ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION (& PUBLIC HEARING) ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Valley View Professional Office PROJECT NUMBER: LUA07-086, 5A-H & ECF LOCATION: South of 5 37th Street, west of 5 38th Court (parcel 3023059111) DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a 26,600 square foot combination general office and medical/dental office building and associated parking and landscaping improvements. The project site totals 244,807 square feet (5.6 acres) and Is zoned Commercial Office (CO). Project construction would occur on the north portion of the project site due to steep slopes. a class 2 stream, a category 2 wetland, and a category 3 wetland occupying the south portion of the project site. A class 2 stream requires a 100-foot buffer. a category 2 wetland requires a 50·foot buffer and a category 3 wetland requires a 25·foot buffer. Primary access to the site would be provided off of S 38th Court. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be flied In writing on or before 5:00 PM on October 1, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON OCTOBER 9,2007 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SITE PLAN, IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION •••• Kathy Keolker;Mayor: . . '. September 14, 2007 . , -, .. ' 'SinhNguyen . . . . .. ;Valley 'view Profes'sional Development; LLC . ',:607 SW Grady Way, ste 210' . Renton, WA9805? : SUBJECT:· Valley .view. Professio'nalOffice iUA07-086,SA"H&ECF Dear Mr. Nguyen: ' ... , . '.'. , : ·.~IT~OFRENTON PlanningJBuildinglPublicWorks Department· . Gregg Zimll1.erman P.E.;,Admini~tr'-tor . This letter is. wiitten on behalfof ih~'Environnienial' ReView. Committee, (ERC) to advise'you· that they, . ' " 'have completedJheiirevi~w or thesubjeCi project imd hilveissued a thresholdDetermin~tionofNon,. ' '. ; ,.' Signiflcance-Mitigated'withMitiga!ionMeasures, Please refer io SectiimC ofth6 enc1osedERC'Report, and Decision for alist,oftheJ\1itigationMeasures," ,'.. . , , ; , -',,' r ',', '.' -; "j,' " • :', _, ,'V'":,,'',, ,"" _, , ,_ '-', . -',: '.:.' ',. .. .' ,', ". '. " " .' ,,-,,' " . I, Appeals. of the, envi~onmental.· d.e,t~rminatlo:n D1u~tbe, .fi,led,lnwritillg oDor.before 5:00 "PM o~ 'October.l; 2007;: Appealsniust be filed in Writing togetner with the required $75,00 application fee with: " ..•...... , .', Hearing Examiner, Ciiy,ilfRent()n,i055'S9utl),'Gi-~dY'\yay, Renton, WA98057, ,Appeals tOlthe ' .. ' ...... "Eximiirieiaregovem~d ,by. City of. R~ntol1'MUnicijJ~l:Code section 4+110:B: . Additional information . " , -. " '. '.' regardirigthe:appeal process,may'ile obtJiinedfr<im.tIie~erit()ri CjiyClei-k'sOffite; (425) 430,6510, . · . " ,. '-' --: ":'" .: ., , .... ". ,', ' .. ::: ,,: .. ,'\', " -. '-, " -'. '.-.' .., . '.. '. . --, ~ :' !' '.. . ,.' .' . , .. \', .'""'-:. , .'. .." .:-.:." .' .. ' -,-: ','~"", .. ".:"'.-' ,.",.',~' ." .. ,'-', " :. '. '-:< . . . " .. ".. ,A Public Hearirig will be', held'bythe~entonHearing, Examiner' inthe·C.ouncil,Chilmbers· on. the '.,' .'.' · '." •. se,:eritbt1o~r oCpty l!"all, 1055 SoutJi Gra~yWay; Rel!ton;Washington, on October 9; 20Q7at9:0'0" ., .... Mito consider the Site Plan. TheapplicaJitorrejJresentative(s) of the applicantisrequiredto be p~esent ... " . ". ,iit the public hearing: A copyofthestaff repcirt~ll te tnailedlo you one week before the hearing .. If the:·' '. '. , EnVironmental Deterrllin~tio~isappealed,the ltppealwill ,Be ·heard as part of this public hearing.' , . " -. ,', ,. .,. . -,'. , -', : .. : .' ~ ',. ,', ,.,.,. .Thepreceding inforIDatiori' will assist you 'in pliUming'for implementation of yo~r project and enable you, • '. ,to' exercise YOUf, appeal rights .morefuiIy, }fy6u.c!100set,o:do: sp,'if you have any, questions or desire .,' CIarific'ation of the aboye,'plea'~~ ~all rile at(425)"~O~72I~, . '. '.' >< . For the El1virom'rientaIReview;Cornnlittee,: '. : . , ~ -',. '. -. ~ .. ;. . ... 1(,., 12'" ,', .,' ,,' -... ,',-,',,', ,'. '.,' " , ':' 1" • ,.,' ',. • , .' -• > ...•...•.•.• ~ill'K.bing, ... ·,71. Senior Planner' .' . . '" " ' . '. - " ... .' ", ,. . ,:,-. -.' J,Santu~fio, D: O'Brien: V. Lemer,B: ViCtor,". S: Rya'ii' /PW:ties of Record . , '".' \" . : -,-'." .. ' ; .' " ." ; .,. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kathy Keolker, Mayor .. September 14, 2007 . , Wa~hiilgtonState • Dep~rtn\entofEcology ·.Ertvif(~rimental. Review.Section .' PO Box 47703 . . . . Olyrripia, WA 98504·7703 .. Eilviiortmeiltal Dettmniilaii6ns . '. ,.' 'CIT-,<:>F:RENTON ., . . .. . . Planning/BuildinglPublic Works Department . . Gregg Zimmerman P.E"Administ~ator ... ;~ ' . . " Transinitted'herewith isa copy ofihe Enyironmentitl Deterinination for the following project re~iewedby . the Enyironinental Review Committee (ERC),on September. 10; 2007: .' . . . .' ,. . , . . . . . DETERMINATION OF NON,SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED " " PROJECTNAME: 'Vall~yViewPrllfessio~~IOffice PROJECTNuMBER:I;uAO?086,S~'I-I ~EC.F. . .... , ". ." , '. LacA nON; " South,of S 37th Street;west ofS 38th Court (parcel 3023059111 ) '.' DESCRIPTION:. " Tlieapplicant ,is: requesting Environmental,(S];jPA) . Review for .the. . ,'construction, Of a. 26;600·' square, foot': combination' general. offici'and'. '. , "' ~ ,:. \ m~ili~itlliieotal :ofric~.j,uiIdingand a~so~iated' parking' ~nd ia~dscajiing "iinprovemenis.Theprojecfsite tcitals 244,807square'feet (5.6 acres)and,is' ",', .,. ',.',,' ..... ~ " ,- " .. ' '.' . ,," . ' .'.' ... ~'-: ". " .. . , ., -"'.' . :. ,'c ..... ' '. '. ' .. "zoned cominei:~lal-.Oftic~(CO): Project cinlstruction w~ulil occur ont~e , . 'northporilQn'~fUieprojec,t site; dlleto.ste~p~lop.es, a clasU stre~m, a .. ' '.,' '" :'categorYZ ·wetland;,and'acatego,.y3 lvetIaIidocciipying the. south' portion' '". ·opheprojects':te::Ac.la~s 7 stream req~ires~iOO.foot buffer,. category 2 . wetlahdrequires:1i 50·fooi'.bufferaod a categofy.3 wethind requites a 25· , foo(bJiIer.:Priin~rY· ac~ess. to,thesiie",o~ld' be. prilVideloffOfS 38'th'" durt; .... '. -':,,:.','" .' ,.. .. " ; .... , , •. ' ;AP~eillS . of theen~ironinent~idete;Ii.inati()~:nuist lJefiledi~;~riting6n !lr:lJ~f~re's:oo: p~,on" . .,October 1,2007, Appeals must befi"id in \Wtirig together with the required $75.00 application fee with: ". ,. , : Hearirig Examiner, Ciiyof. Renton; 1055 South Giady ,WaY"Renton, W A 98057{' Appeals' to· the .. ' ExamiIie~ are goyerned by CitY of Rem ton MuniCipal C~d~,Section4·8·11O:B., Ad4iii6hal iriformation . ;". , regarding the appeal ptoceSs maybe obtained frointhe Renton' City Clerk's 'Offi~e; (425)430·6510:. . ... , . .' -'".. . ,.;.-., . . . ". : ~ ~ " . '-', If you have questions, please'callrne ate 425) 430c7219 .. , ' '-' ' ". "," ',' '.: ,--', ", .' . . ; .. ' , :''; . . . .' . For'theEn~iroruTiental Revie~ Comm;tt~e, ... -, ",. " .,' .-' . " ' ..• ;; . . ' . ' . , - j71{;1l(J , Seriior Planner ',: .. , '. ' ,-;., . .• KirigCou~tYWasiew;ter Tr~~tnieIltDivision --'WDFW,StewaitReinbold . .'. . . , ,' .. '. ,': . , .. '.>', ".' . D~vidF. Pietzman, DeBartn1erii of Natural Resmiices WSpOT,NorthwestRegion .•.. · . , .; ~ .. :, .·-,..:..,..:,·-'--'--"":......C·-.. ~i""05,.:.5...,S-O.:.Uth'-··,..G+rad.:.·.-·y'-w-a-y.:.-~R~en~··t.:.oo~,7W""as~h..:.i...,ng:..to.,..'O.:.'· . .:.98-0:-5~7""7.-,-'--'-"-'-'--···;RE.~·~··(J.·.·~.· •. ·: . . " ~ .. ··,$:~i~~~r~~titr~~·5~l'io.,~~a~~~I,;o,~~tC:on~urri~';.:. ~:HE~D,OF'THE CUR:YE "'. ..•. . "'~ " :,. :" .-'. " . .'; .' .• ... ' .c'ITY OF,RENTd~.':" '.' DETERMINATION OFNON·SIGNIFICANCE~MITIGATED 'MITIGATIONMEASURES ", . APPLICATION NO(S): . . APPLlyANT: . ....... , LUA07 c086, SA,H& ECF 8inhNguy~ri . ..' .' . .' ValleyView ProfessionaIDevel<ipment, tLc ' .. , 607SW,Grady Way,sts 210 .. ,.,.; Renton;,WA 98057.' . "':'," ' '. , Valley View Professiona(Office , . '".' ' " ,-, ; .', ,,', . . construction of a 26,600 sq .' ,.' '. parking .and landscaping im,,,' ·nv"m'enl. . -,' "' ... ", :: ',:., 'r .••. '1' . '.' , " .' .. .. ', ..... , .. , < .Commercial Office' (CO), Project lOnrllilrr"lOlinn th,e'projElct site':duel()'Sleep , , ", slop~s; acl~ss 2· stream, ,a category 2 project 'site, A c.lass2 str,eam requires a 100., ,Inr,l' U~~.~s~:ti;att;;~~~~l~ category 3 wetland requi~esa 25.foot.~uffer, Pri>l1alrv.a . LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:', 3~t1;~~i~~~;~r,m;~~i~~;lst . LEAD AGENCY: .. , ' ,'. ';-· ... '·f·F .''' ... , '. ,,: . '. (', :.<. ':," .' :'; ,:Mb"IGATION;M i:AsuREs:, . , ,~' . '_ ;:: __ ~"(_,'_', ... ' .. ,:r ... ' ....... _ .... ~ .:<: ,'_,~.:~.:,',.:.' ,:', "", .'~' .,,':'; ':' _:_; ., .. :", ~ ,':,,-, ,.'. aOljlic;ant' shall· p,ay Ihe,,~ppr()pri;lte : ~ire 'Mi!i~atio,nFeeba~ed'()n, a, r~le 'cif$0.t12per sq~~reil~ot <if .. 'lOomn"'"ci",l. bUilding ':area'prlor'to, the. Issuance ,01.' bUilding permits, .:TheJee 'Is./estlmated.· at. ..... " .' . ,-;;. ?".·t.';,··,:~:, ':-;:~':-:" .. ,;-;.':-,.~'" --.... ,.; .. : .. :-:"';.' ... ':.,'"' ..... _-.;: ..... :; .. ,,~: , " ' , '. c , ," •• " "~,. ' . "'. . ',. ,',' "; ~ :' . , .J. ',':' ~: ,' .. : .... , . .,<" . ;~ " ... . ,~ ,:', ;.~, 'l.' ..• ,., :'''' ".' -':.' . ,J'.; ';"" : .... -,.:-.', ; '-.>., . ',< "'!"': ,'. ,. . ':, ", '.<'l'.', ; .. :,', . '.: '.;' .. , ': ..... '. : _,~ ! '. J' '".': " ", ;'; ,,!. . "~" .. :'1" .',' .. .\'." .,':' ':'i,"," '.' "" . ",',' ". ~ .. 'i.:', '.' .'-:,; .. '. i. ,.; :". ' . ".,," "'{'. . -. ":i> . '. .':J 'J' ,'? .' ',;-'," , " ;." . :".':"" . '" .. ". . .';,: . . ; .. ' ." :',. -'.' ' .. , '. APPl.ICATION NO(S): •. APPIJCANT:. .• UjA07~0B6,SA-H & ECF' . " ' .. :' '.-,' . ." " .. ;, .. ' , ,";. ' .•. Binti. NguyenValleyView Professional Qev~lopnient,. LLG607 svy Grady .• . '. Way,ste21 ORehton~ WA 98057 < .' .... : .....' .'. '0:.' .' . " .: • . .~_ '. . . ': . ..' " , " ':'. I .. " . PRbJECT;NAME:.· .' .\laJley",j~w PiQiesSi~n~LOffic~ ..' . , . \., :-'~ ' .. ~ . . . . . , . '.' .'. ., DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: i." " . The-applic~ntisreqUestihg> Erwir6nnienial (SEPA)., Revi~w for·t;'~;·~ :'> . '.' '. constructiono( f'l'f6 ;600sqlJare foot combination generalOffjce andmedicalldiHlt~loffice bli iJding:andassdciate~ ": .. ' .' • p'!rkirig:ahd.landscapifl9·. i rnproverj]ents·.· The Project . site 'tota,ls 2~4·,897'squarefeet . (5.6 ,acres )'and. iszone'q' Commercial Office, (CO). Project construction .would occur on thenmth portion· of the project site 'due' to sleep . :,. . slopes,; a class 2 stream,'a f:ategory.2 wetland, and' a category. 3' wetland .occup.ying the south pprtion:of the' . .... project'site. A class 2 stream requires a 100-foot Duffer,.a category 2 wetland .requires.a '50-foot buffer and a' c. '. category 3 wetland requires a 25-foot buffer .. Primary access to the sitll would be provided off of S 38th Court. . . .. "; •. ":.' \6~~TldN'6~~PRbPOSAL; ••...•........ >.soUth:of S37~h ~tre~t,~est ofS38tti c~urt(parCeI30230591iJr "".-' .', ,";" ~".': ;_; .. ,,:~:.<~)~~l:~~,~~~I'fi:~,.::\~~~ ':,' ,", . ".','J ... .' .\"" ",", ,',: .:;LEADAGEJ\i¢Y:.' ...... '.. •... .•.• ";:lnJrl;~rtY<sU'{enton '~""YI";: ". ." .' ... ' < .... '. . .... . . ,-.:, '.' ..:.~~I(:~~'.~:~~~~~~nr~~;1i~~~;jli~~~lP~:'r;c~~~.kS .,1 . , .. ' <, •.....••. ..' ......• Ii. ; .'. '. ", ." ,' ••...... " .. " ",.l{~"~~tiCrY!tlb(es,tbAp1i'i~~'lt:f\':; ';.' ......... '. '., '" '.' ...... . .... '.' .......... 'c,> , , .1'. : Th~ follf>w{ngnotes. ar~s l!iJp/lime.r,tal'lijfof{l!att'lf. Pf.'l.r.!9.,e,flf{.'J'!i...0rljU(1r;tiiinfw((h the en,{ironm.f3nt.lil det*!rrilin~tion:) ,c , '.1. ,'.;." iB,eca~~et.flf3~e,/?ote~~rf! pr~v.ld{!d~~'':r-'!!lIDau,?t:'~O'1lr;'t'J,~r _ a.re~rot ~U~J~f3ct to tlleiappea/proc;,~~s:.for, .... i '" < . .... .'. -:'e ,',.' "'J'l: :",ii'! ~T1vlw!!menta"deter(!1!nat,ons;. ,' .. "'.. ......, ". ""'.: ":' '.""'. ' .... : .... :.'.' .. ' ',:' ''''If'''''~}1 __ q''''')'~ifri1rl111' 1':!J:r:!".-··:t':,.xi(,;h'·"i" "~ " , .. ,' . ...... '\I~·nn.i28\,i " ....... : ......•...... ,/ .......... ::;:~«,>::·.S:~,~;~~ij~~~<;, ,:'~, · •.. ·/h?l':·· .. ,'." .' ................. '," ' ..... ' 1.··.RMC section4'4;030:C.2 limitshaGlh'ours,il'etween .8:30 am t~3:30 .. pm;"Mondayth·roughFridaY.ui1less otherwise' • . . . ...•... ·c; •• ···.approv.ed.by·the. t)evelcip,inentSe~i~i~)9.i~1~19,n: . .{fh(l'be"eloll~}{e~(s,~r;ice,s,lD Ivision . rt;.sllrves, the rightto iesci(lci the . .... ·.,approvede~tendedh~;ul hour,S at!J~y';!I()1e]:C?rn.pl~nt~;are~~c.j'!r~ed' )~41· " .... '. ....... ,> ' ....... , ." , ~ ' __ ." '-,. "")',-': "",.","': ': <tll~' ':\''' .. ','' ,:",11". :~ ,Ii!':" l .-."j,.,.' l'''~l' -• , . ._"_." ", " -. . . ,,',., /_~.Withinthirty. (3p)days.ofco.rnpl~tism.ofg'raQtngworJ<;\t?tappli~ant"shil.!llhydroseed.or plant ali appropriateil(oun<j ....,.' ";" . . cover over any portion of the' site that is graaed"qC'cleared:of veg~tation and where no further construction work will . . " occur within ninety·(90) days:~lternative measureS'such,a's.mulch, sodding, orpl~stic covering as specified.in the. ,', " " .i:urrenfKing·CountY. Surface WateFMa'nagementD~sign ManuaLas adopted by the.City of Rim ton may be proposed. .'; "': ...•. b~tw~enthe:daies.ofNovember;1stand.M!irch31stof eacnyear. Tne OevelopmenlServices Division'sappl'OVal of' ... " this, work is required prior to firial.inspiOlctiohand:appro,<al qlthe permit:..'.· ' '. '. '3: c~~;n~rbiai:rn~lti-fa~iIY;'ne~'Si~gle:i~;nil§ and other ridnr~sid~ntia' cori~truciion activitiesshal; be restricted ;0 the.> .' ... ' hours betw~en seven o'clock (T:OO).a'rl) .and.eighto'Clock(8:00) p.m ,;M?ndiiytliroughFriday.Work on Saturdays ..•. shall oerestrictedto:thetioursbetween .nimio'clock(9:00) a.m. and eighto'ciock (8:00) p.m. No work stiallbe . ·..permitte~oriSunqays.;: '; '..: '. •....... • . . .<, ':' . . "" '4. 'AII'lal1dscadingSh~il b~ irrig~tedbyan ~pprovedirrigati~n'syst~mpricir tOfi~al6ccupancy permits.'· ,;. ',,' , "-.' -" " "-'. ,. " , . " " :" " -, .. ' '. ',' .' . ". :.' '5:" c~:Sii~ PI~.~.for~~~-Fir~ ·.~Iann. ingi.s.i~ed: to .b~,· sUbrnit;ed f;rYOur·.~r~j~ct· pri. ·.iissuan~~·.~;;~~ildi~9 "oLp~n~y;:!< ? .. \.,: ", ' -.,: • '~' > • ' Building .. " " . .' " ", ~", .--':.",,: . .. · ,. "1. . Building, Electrical, Plurnbing and Mechan'idal perrnits will be·recj'uired. ',' .,.'."..., • ........, !.< • :,'-" : . . --,', j.·'nie Wate; Syst~m Developrnent Charges are based bn a (ate 6f$0.273 x. the toial square feetet tM building .site.',. .' '.: ' , .. ·t=stirnated f!3e based'of1itieentire~ite.plal]is $67;000. (2M,a07 sq;.feet.x $0.273),PaymentoffE1.eswilibe require,d .. :.. "prior to issuaiigeqf building perrnit. Square foot~ge ohvelland.s fI]?lybe exemptfro.rn sy*rn deyeloprnent.fee ' .. ' ". calclliations. Aj'iplicant will· need·to identifY square footage of wetlands.' " .....>.. . '. . . c', .... . '2; ·PrEilirniriary'~reflci'wreqUiredby.thefiredeparirnehiiS 2,000gp~. T0q hya;~ni~ ~;e reqUi;e~ tl> serve:ihis'Siie:one., " '.' .. :hydrart slialibEl withii:1'150. f~et andorieaddillonalshall'b~ withir;I'~OOfee, ofthintructure, . . . '.' ..'. .' ' •• ".: ,.' ":'. • ,',-I .' :' . .';:.' .; . ". ".:: .', . ':_ :','. .' .1." ••• _',: _. ", , • e'" _.... .' . , ","... . . "" ,':. '.~" · :.3:' ·Existing. hydrants'approved,to becountedas'fire protection shall be retrofitted with:a quick disconnect Stem: ·fitting if. '. ' .. < '.' . . not' already installed.:Note 'oli pian'it'requirec( Show locaiions' of all exisiing tiYdrants.:·;· . ,. ..' . .' . " ." "", ,.': " ... _~,',,'" .': •• :", ".'_ r v')"'. ,\' .:. · .. ,~, A water'main extension is iequired:onsite. :. ... ,. . ... ' . '.. .. ." ".. . . ... .' 5. 'ft. fire spr;riklerSyste~is recj~ired(f,s~pa;~ieutiii~yper~it ind ~ep~rat~Jilan~.'I<iI~b~reqUifed forij,!l.ins;aHation~f :.:<.' '. : "~' .: the (ioupledetector .check valye as~ernbly.to theflre sp.nnklersystems; AI! devlge.slnstalied sh$1I b!l per the latest '.' .. ' .. . '. , ... ,: .. Dep.artfl]erit of Health "Approvi;;dList"cif Backflo;Yjereifeh!i()n;,G,~¥lces.yivil.plan~ shpw.l.ocation ofd~vice .andshould .. ' .... ' . . ' .'. :.' note: 'IS~par~te.p.I~,,\s~nd.utiUty p~r~itJw;gp~V~J~~stallatioWf9.~f.ir~ .Sp~inkler.Sy'st~rn. viill ,be .req~lre~·\ For ::'" " . " .:. OI!)CVA·lnstaHatlons InSide the bUlldlng,.appllcant' shall· subrnlt'a cQPy~of;the.rnechanJcal.plan, shOWing the location. and: . : " , -". -.' --. . • " . ", ".~ .. ~ 't>\., -'. "~,:", . ,,' ',A ., ." "," .' '," ,--" . . • " installation of.the backflow assernbly,~nsi~E1~the rn~sDan.ical ~g,~rn.~lnst~ll~ti~{l'~hall be,i~ a.cco~danc,e with the yity of'" .c.·;' . ,Renton's requirernents.·DDCVA sh?l!1 be Instalilld'lmrnedlately alter.the Rille has pass,ed through the bUilding fto~r. , ; '.", '.: '., :~.~lab.ln~tal!a;tion6fdeVi,~eS .• sh.al! ~?;iR·the')1.,b.:ri~.~nta.lpo. ~itio.n. ': pnI Y>'".; ~'~;"\\'.':::'., .. :.:. '.:. '. >:. .'..... '.,. '''','' '." . .. . " " .. ~ " "r--.·· .. 'i~ .r )..\;. ,."",,,' , " ... :6" .:L:~.n!:lSC<lpeiriigation sys.tem$:~il! fequ i~~FS?8.~tfte,perrii i~' f@tt.l.!i irrig~tio~rnelllrand apprci~ed ba(:kfIO~"I'~evice i~.':,' .:; ,\_' :.-;:,} "'/:~'~·,r~.~u~~~~',_~O.,~~.,I_~~.~~I.I,~~: .A. ·~~~~~ir~·:~~.r~JLj~!~~~~~~~.~~'~~?~~:):::)::":'~ .. ,/._.~ I~' ':.:'\\"~" :'."" ::,: :': .:-".-',/ .• >~ .:'.-. '.; .. ~"."; r::"'~ "',> ',; t:·}UUd,ings. thate~ceed. 30 feet inneig~t)Vl~ ;~~u ~~;,af~:~9.~f!~~~E!yiC~.tof~d~staILe~.,Of! ,dorn.e~tic~at~r :,~eter;., ., .•. , ':: ........': .: · ; .. '.·;a., .A Reduced.'Pressure BackfloWAssernbly (RI"Bf.\):wiU'.I~e required to ljelJn!;tall.eq',wlth. the3-mch dorne!;tlccornpound. :' ","'<,watermet~r " "'. .:X':::\\;'f;{;':~~ i~:~~\','~l/)Q~"'Jl':::' . ..' .' ',~. · Plan~eview' SAN IT)l.RY 'SEWERl;\,:i )jl"~'::'\'~;."·;;·:: ~., :<""<' :~~f' y( ", ',> .•• . .... . '." > ',',. .' ," . · ,.'.:'._ :-,', " .' .. : .' ,.", ", -".1',,' \;'I..,"":~( -f.,: ,,~::-,~_ ; '; :--<."",'{\: )-·,;rf.", . :'. ,_ ..... , ,r',' .... , '. ,1 ..• The Sewer: Systen:' Developrnent ,Charges~!!!e,bas!ld·:9.na'rate 'of$O:)42'xthe t~tal squar~ feet, of tile buU(ji,ng site .. " ".:. ,,: Estimated.fe~s based:6n the entiresiteplaiHs$~.?;O,09:·(24.4;·a97"sq':feet'>c$O.142).PaYf'(1ent oHees willbere.quired . . . ' prior to issuance otbuilding permit .Square fooiiigeof, wetlatids''irlaybe,exernpt.frorn systern:developrnerit fee. '. ' .. ,', . '. 'ca,lculations, ApplicantwilLneed to ideritiiysquare (obtage' oh"etlands·. ..' '. . .. '. ". . 2 ... If f()6d ~reparati~nf~cilities~~e' p;ciPosed,a~re'a~~trap o(grease i~terceptcir. ",ill ~e~!3ciUired.it is not apparent on ihe ,'.,,;. '.plansprovided:· ' ,,"., ,'.' .. .' . . . . .. " -,'-. . ' 3.· Parking garagewill:ie'qu!r~ flbor drains by thebuild,ing department a~d ~hall~e cmmectildto the. sanitary sewer '.; . · \." .sys!ern, Flqws sh:allbe dire9ted through floor drainsthat areinstalle(j in,accordancewiththeUnifmrnPlurnbing Code .. , , .to an 'interior or exterior oil/water separator. The separator sliall,lie sized to rneet a'rninirnurn 15-rninute retention tirne " for peak·.flows antiCipated in the garage area, but in no case will be less than 200 gallons of storage capacity. The. .' . ".:. . type of interceptor shall' baas manufactured:by·Pipe ·Inc:;. Utility Vault Inc" or.approvedequal. Theoil/water'sepa'rator , : ands'izing cak:ulationsshall be shown·onttlecivildrawings .. , ::. '. ,.':, .' .,' .. ', " ;'. , --, .,' - . , ". . -' . 'I" ' • • {. ,.".. • "". 4~Sidesewer;haii be a rninirnurn ot2%Slope. . ... '.-'. Plan Review~ SURFAcEVVATER • ,. < "1. Th~ Surla~ W~tersyst~rn' Devel;p~entCtiarg~sarebaS~d(ma rate~f'$O',265 ;<the tbtal square feet of th~new . · . c .irnperVious.sufface area ot.·the site. Payrnentof fees will be' required prior to ,issuance of building permit.·· . ..: .. :~, "'A,d;ainage report frorn 'Ex~eltech Consulfing d~ted July16, 20()7ha~b~~lis~brnitted.prelirninaiy r~\(ieWindicatesihe' report add~esseS'detention and water quality .if! accordance with.the 2Q05 King County SurfaceWater ManuaL.·· ;:.., i.:"" ", .', ,.. -". ~." .".' _.,,':,-, ~"'. ".," '. ' . -, ,;: .' ERC' Advisory Not~s . . " :: --. . .. ' .. "Page 2013 '.' " ~ . -I' . , ... ' " .... , -----------------------------------------------------------.. " ./~ " . , ' . " '.,'.,:. '3.·separate'ist~uctura,·p,ans~wil, .• ~Jir~dJooes~L,tiedfOrreVieW~~9~pIJal~ria~r'a b~Hdirigpe:r~iif~; the·' proposed underground vauII:Spef:ial.inspectionfr6m Iheouilding department \liillbe required/ ' ..... ,,' '. .'. . 4: " E;~SiO~ '~ontroi; sh~il~~rriPIY witj,;D~partine'nt 6fEC~169Y'S' n\:ost~urr~~t Stor~~~;erMaD agerTlentM~~~~I",· . ' ...... ; .. ~ . . ,'" ""-':: ..... " . . -'" .' Plan Review '-TRANSPORTATION" " .'\' .':'-.' : ,"';., ·····j'~:ReqUi(~l1ie'nt~t6i~prove·anddediCaieadditionalri9ht~f\oVayin~:37ihstr~et.~as ~~~nw~i~ed:by~nadmini~;rative" ..... : ;'.' decisioriapprqvedby'Neil Watis; Director, of Development?ervices. '. '.' • .';' ." ....: ' .. . 2 .....••. pr\~~ry~~~essto i~~.~it~0illbefr6rn\Re~xistin~~dva\er~~;~wa;i~ s.; 3,81~. Stre~t : S~CO~d~rY~~t;~s~ill.b~ fiQi"s.,··· .'." 3,7 .. SIreeLAccess dnv\lway .fr0n1 S 3? SIreetwl1i be .g~ted... , < . ' . . . , ..... ,." ." •... " .. ' . . 3. ". Atraitidan~ly;r~ h~S beensubih iited; and;i~c~rr~ritly ~i1iierf~~iew,. prelirrii~aiy' revi~i:indi6~t~s:hoad~erseim ~a~ts • 6r improven1enis;in Talbot Road will be require.dasipart()f this.de.velopment ., • '. . . . . '.;-~. ""-';'~'" ". ;.:-.,~>~." .-.-..... ,: .'~"':'':-'' ".:":: .. !"~-.:,.'; '.~' ..... ~ ... L ,." ., ... , • Plan:Revieiv~ IvllSCELl:ANEOUS. ' .':, :,' '>:.. ,.."., ,....' .;",' ".' '. ~" .1:G6nsiructi~~ ,PI~p' indipaiinghaQlrouteilrld. hplirs~coi,s~rui:tib,!pours'and a t~affic c~ntrc,l :Pla.ns,h.all~e .SUbrnitte~. for ,'; . apprQvalpriqrto ariypermitbeingi~sued,··'.·'·· •.... , , ......•..•••........••. , .•..•.•...... , .... ';' .. ' ' .... ,. .......•..•.•. ' .. " .• ' ~;. , .', 2: .' Ariyio~~el'i~5:pr.r~tai,ningWalls:gr~ate~:tha~4feet'i~j,~ight to~~:bu illd' auri.rigcon~ir~~\i6n of ytii iti~~iequires ,ii, , ··'.sepilratebuilding permi!submittal with s1luctur1l1 CillCulCitions. ana shall have the follow,ingsepa(ate note sh~n be •... . " . included on tne civil'plan: '~Alicensed engineer Witb'ge<i:t~clihic,a!.exp,ertisen1~stberetain~dJciip~oposedrockeries .', . '. gieate~ tlian four feetinheight'the~ngirieer;iilust monitOrrcicke?y":-c,\lnsiruction arid; verify :in :writin~ that the rocker,y ....... '., was cohstryctedingerieral' aC<iOrdan_C:~v.:it&~~~ ~iiih]~dS ~affd~i!h:r1'iii£~erSlJppl~J1:,en!~i"recornme~diitions~ i~ca . " '. , professional manner and of com·petent'an.9 suita.lile,material.;"'· . f.' ~ _~, .'" ' ". """, -" ;.,",' "'" .', ': .,"" .,' .', ' '. . , I~".. :. ~h,~ I;~'''''' , "~'" , •.• :,J.' ll\ ''\ . :'F?lan:R~vi~w-GENERAl:':-' '.~ ;,,\ X?:· "; '''\~'),'i'< ,", · ": .. , ... ; "' .. " '.' ",'" "';!) ',., . .1:,1 , .• 4~..~ ... · .. ·~r.'··· .. ' . ,> 1. ;Anplan~;i;h~lIi:o;;formto'theReAidj,'Drafting§iai'dars.:"m,; .... ; \; ;"Ii>. ' ' •..•.... '. . :''; .', · ' '. :--" " .:< ,'<:': ";: ':'" .. :.'/::.:,,.', ,; \,,;, i';,7f' '~"-' ).) ::~~( ... :, ~ti\:··>.!>;,~,~i\ut~lI~~~'~;:%1\;~\'~,?:·:;~!,;;,.:;" ;'.'. ;, .,', ~'" ,/j;,:, /' :~~ . ,:':.:, '~' > ", ,-, . :,'"~.";,,, ',':. ~ ',->" > :'.: :;. '" "::, \,' <:' .. : " '2. ;AlI'reqUiredutllity.· dralnageand'street1ImproVements(wlltregUi. separate,Qlansutlmlttals prepared accQrdlng>!oClty, .. ' , 'of Rentondri'ifting' ~t~ndardsby'~ liceriseifCf\til:ErigM~el'f~~C'" '.' f' '1!:<' .If' ',:,<';;: •.. :: "": ::,>"" ~ :."', -:''',' ",',,> :',' ___ ;._: -.' ":,' -'~'."-''',, _ c' ,,:';"', < '_" ,:\1" .'-:,: ".-,:" .\\,-.:, ';1;1.\'~~A~j' -:li\~li'" ,,:', ':~1i\~~-. ,,',' ,: .. ,i" ,.":,' "":'''''''i\~j .';; '/ ',';' ,"",'_, ~:' ':\ ."'. _!,'-,,'/::'''' ',,' -,,'.'" 0",: ~' ,-. .1: ,: ,," , ; : .3" '; ·.Sepanite .per~ itsand.fees.for· Sid~,SeV(~\Water<ri1ei~rs,;I<l,n~~CaPe,.~i!9i!,li}Jn~'Ji\lters;: <!nd. <lriy, tia9kftowdllyiCE:s.Viijl'. be requIred. ' \\ ,1ft"" \ 1t" ' , ~ -, i" M\{r'J1i,O,'d';!{ " " ' , , -,;' A,~ ).4.',0(, '. ' pJ,!",: L," ',.1' 0"' , • • '.4: 'When pla!1s are complete three copitl,sof the;dr~wiQgs.,two c.opie~·ofl)heiarai,nage rep<;>r:t; a constr.ucti<;>n estimate and , ..... : .....•. applic8!ion fee. shall bes~bm ittedClt!~::~i~jf11Ipor9§uhJ..ti\~::~fe~~()r,~s~tlet is attai:.hedfor. YOUru~e.\l.ut:pri,Oi.lO .... .... . '. " .. prep;rin:,' a Check,' ,ltls,(e~Q~l1len~~dt~'C~~~~5':~~~~1~? .f35.~f;~.;,?-tl"1~teng~;era.le~ b~ th~perl11lt' system.; .... , . ,.' . . , .. 5: 'APPIi2a~ts:hall,b.E!re~p'Onslbl~'f9,r;Se~unng, ease;:~~~,:!~r,\R~~!lc'ytlli!ieS;On the~fOJ7c\Slt~ .. ' ,/ •.•.. ' .. '. " , " .. '. ...... :." , , .. ' . r' . : ' . . .,-..... '.' : , . · ,ERG'AdvisorY Notes' . ,;: .. '( ;, ,". . ':", '., :".'.' . '.' ., ... '-''','' .' ',:' ", .' ~-.. .. 1.··· , .\' , , ".. . , ; . . .... ,," .;!~: ; ,,: -' . "; .; .~: ,;; ' .•...... :' ". . "'-.'. "'. ". ' ' .. . ',' '-'. :'. ~ ... '. ", . , " . -'.' ~" .-. ,.,' .. , . , .... : --;,~ .. ' . _ .. " . . ".' ..... :-, -,' -·t" ';' . '-". ,,' ,'.' " .. . . ,,, ...... '--' . .~?/ , ",. . .'-..... ::-" \. :, " :: ,.' ::',: . ."' . ~, . : < .. ;, .. '." .. '.' C" • .. " . -, , " , . .. ,' .. ,.' page3~3 ....• '. -'-.-., • • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA07-086, SA-H, ECF APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: Binh Nguyen Valley View Professional Development, LLC 607 SW Grady Way, Ste 210 Renton, WA 98057 Valley View Professional Office DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a 26,600 square foot combination general office and medical/dental office building and associated parking and landscaping improvements. The project site totals 244,807 square feet (5.6 acres) and is zoned Commercial Office (CO). Project construction would occur on the north portion of the project site due to steep slopes, a class 2 stream, a category 2 wetland, and a category 3 wetland occupying the south portion of the project site. A class 2 stream requires a 100-foot buffer, a category 2 wetland requires a 50-foot buffer and a category 3 wetland requires a 25-foot buffer. Primary access to the site would be provided off of S 38th Court. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: South of S 37'h Street, West of S 38 1h Court (parcel 3023059111) The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on October 1, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works September 15, 2007 September 10, 2007 q/loh Date 9'-10 -07 Date . David Daniels, Fire Chief Fire Department Dale • , • , , , ;I J , • ~ ,; : , ~ ----- ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :; 133HS 1:13AOO ill-SS-ddd .. ---<. _<C' , / , I/J " , / / / , , ! , ! I ! i ' ill; Iii! 11"1 /, ,1'1 ! '11'1'1"'1'1' II !I!!!i ! ltll 11,1 -_:Ina /.II " I . '! ! SSOB6 NOWNIHSVM 'NOiN3~ 1]3~lS HiL£ HinOS xx, ~dOl3fI3a 3OWO 1VNOISS3~OIld M31A A311V" d~~ H~H~dl ~ liHHUH!H~ H!I! H~~! !!!! ! ·Iq lilll ill Iii i I !"! ~ I I iilll I!I! ! II I II liIi II! II ~ II' I ; 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111IIIIIIIII1111 !lllmlhlilllllltu ~lli £SOB6 N01~NIHSVM 'NOIN3~ 133~lS H1L£ HlnDS XXv 1~d013"3a 3:)f,j~O 1"'NOISS3~Olld M3JfI A311 ... " , , , , , ===fJ: , , , , ~ o:~ 0 ~ ~ .,r ~8 QI= R a.oCID::< Cl ~~ i8~8~ N iU) • • • • • II] II 11 II i Zz ~ C ~~ w > !z~ . (") -wu. -W l~ ~ 0 o . w mo < a: ~ i II , I I , I , I. Ii ! CA r CA ZONING PIBIPW TBCBNICAL 8BB.V1CB8 t1l/'1.IlIfn R-8 I" R-l 77th Ave: SE I3 • 31 T23N RSE E 112 o 800 too H3 -•..• -----ReDtmI. Cit, LtmJt.I 1.-4.800 30 T23N R5E E ING MAP B RBSIDBNTIAI [!§J Reeource Conlen.UOD ~ RealdenUal dulac ~ Residential" dulac ~ He.ldanUal 8 dulac ~ ReaidenUal Manufaclured Home. ! 11-10 I RuidenU.l 10 du/ec I R-l~ I RellldenUal 14 dulac I RM-fl ReaidanUal Multi-Family IIIM-T I ReeidenUal Multi-Family TndiUonal IRM-ul ReaidenUal Multi-Family Urban Center- Printed by Print & Mall Services, City of Renton Commerclal/Offioll/ReeldenUal COMMERCIAl ~ Commercial Arterial- ~ ComrnllTeiai Offic.- ~ Commercial NeJ.t:hborhood INDUmuAL [1i;J lndu.trlal -lIeavy o Indultrlal -Medium o Indu_trial -U,hl (P) Publicly owned ---_ Renlon City Limits --_.-Adjacent City Umill _ Book Pa,'" Boundary KROLL PAGE • May include OverllY Diltrlctll. See Appeodb: mape. For additional re,ulaUona In OverlllY Diltrict., plel.e Ice RIle 4-3. PAGE# INDEX :ttNIEL O'BRI~N, DDS, MSt August 29, 2007 Senior Planner Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, W A 98057 IPIS Pf<:J)IATRIC DENTISTRY Diplomat. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry RE: VALLEY VIEW PROFESSIONAL OFFicE/LUA07-086 Dear Senior Planner: We are pleased to see that deveiopment is going on 'with the professional property adjacent to Vailey Medical Center. We welcome the development of this property. Our only concern is that there be sufficient planning for the tremendous number of additional vehicles that will be present on site during the construction phase. As this is a large piece of property, certainly parking can be provided for the construction vehicles. Otherwise, the sole access street (which is 38 th Court) will be constantly jammed making it impossible for the ingress and egress of patients who are , visiting the two professional offices on 38 th Court. Parking is already full on the main street of Talbot from the hospital all the way to 38 th Court. ' I would also suggest that an egress be provided off of 37 th ' Street for fire vehicles as well as construction vehicles. I am sure that you have 'already considered'these parking and traffic factors, but I wanted to assure ~Oli. that there are quite a number of patient trips which are currently using the parking on 38 t Court. " Thank you for your kind assistance. Sincerely, _ 1)ANe)~;V Dr. Daniel O'Brien, Owner 400 S. 38 th Court, . ',' i' . ,. . ", .~~'" ",' -. ,. :,' •. ' ·· .. 1,. r: ; -.:-... ~; .' ," , I : :_." .. . ...... ' .. '~ ,", .;', " '. ~ 1 '-" .', • " " . ,'-. ' 400 South-38th Court, Suite A Renton, WA 98055 425·255·6008 t.J • • STATE OF WASHINGTON DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON AUG 3 0 2007 RECEIVED DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC PRESERVATION 1063 S. Capitol Way, Suite 106 • Olympia, Washington 98501 Mailing address: PO Box 48343 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8343 (360) 586-3065 • Fax Number (360) 586-3067 • Website: www.dahp.wa.gov August 28, 2007 Ms. Jill Ding Senior Planner Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way RentonIW Al98057 In future correspondence please refer to: Log: 082807-07-KI Property: LUA07-086, SA-H, ECF Valley View Professional Office Development Re: Archaeology -Survey Requested Dear Ms. Ding: We have reviewed the materials forwarded to our office for the proposed project referenced above. Based on its location and topography, the area has some potential for archaeological resources. While the scale of the development is small, we recommend that a professional archaeological survey of the portion of the project area that will be developed be conducted prior to ground disturbing activities. Identification during construction is not a recommended detection method because inadvertent discoveries often result in costly construction delays and damage to the resource. We also recommend consultation with the concerned Tribes' cultural committees and staff regarding cultural resource issues. These comments are based on the information available at the time of this review and on behalf of the State Historic Preservation Officer. Should additional information become available, our assessment may be revised. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project and we look forward to receiving the survey report. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (360) 586-3088 or ScotL Williams@dahp.wa.gov. Sincerely, Scott Williams Assistant State Archaeologist (360) 586-3088 scott. wi lliams@dahp.wa.gov CC: Laura Murphy, Muckleshoot Tribe Charlie Sundberg, King County City of !ton Department of Planning / Building / pUb/lorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~nllml0 Oev. COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 30, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA07-086, SA-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 16, 2007 APPLICANT: Valley View Professional Development LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Ding PROJECT TITLE: ValleyView Professional Office PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 244,807 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): 26,600 square feet LOCATION: S of S 37'h Street, W of S 38 'h Street (3023059111) I WORK ORDER NO: 77793 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a 26,600 square foot combination general office and medical/dental office building and associated parking and landscaping improvements. The project site totals 244,807 square feet (5.6 acres) and is zoned Commercial Office (CO). Project construction would occur on the north portion of the project site due to steep slopes, a class 2 stream, a category 2 wetland, and a category 3 wetland ocupying the south portion of the project site. A class 2 stream requires a 100-foot buffer, a category 2 wetland requires a 50-foot buffer and a category 3 wetland requires a 25-foot buffer. Primary access to the site would be provided off of S 38th Court. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable' Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LighVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airporl Environment 10,000 Feet 14.000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS /!;O kz~v C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ~"I ) Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date .r I \ City of !ton Department ~f Planning / Building / pUblilorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 30, l!JIIW:LUI"M • APPLICATION NO: LUA07-086, SA-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 16, 2007 CI1Y OF RENTON APPLICANT: Valle View Professional Develo ment LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Din PROJECT TITLE: Valle View Professional Office SITE AREA: 244,807 s uare feet LOCATION: S of S 37'" Street, W of S 38 th Street (3023059111) SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a 26,600 square foot combination general office and medicalldental office building and associated parking and landscaping improvements. The project site totals 244,807 square feet (5.6 acres) and is zoned Commercial Office (CO). Project construction would occur on the north portion of the project site due to steep slopes, a class 2 stream, a category 2 wetland, and a category 3 wetland ocupying the south portion of the project site. A class 2 stream requires a 100-foot buffer, a category 2 wetland requires a 50-foot buffer and a category 3 wetland requires a 25-foot buffer. Primary access to the site would be provided off of S 38th Court. . A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Ught/G/are Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cu/tural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS GovcfZNt N6 Cc>PtE= )006 IISC We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City o.nton Department of Planning / Building / pu&orks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: AU DATE CIRCULATED: SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA LOCATION: S of S 37 th W of S 38 th Street SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a 26,600 square foot combination general office and medical/dental office building and associated parking and landscaping improvements. The project site totals 244,807 square feet (5.6 acres) and is zoned Commercial Office (CO). Project construction would occur on the north portion of the project site due to steep slopes, a class 2 stream, a category 2 wetland, and a category 3 wetland ocupying the south portion of the project site. A class 2 stream requires a 100-foot buffer, a category 2 wetland requires a 50-foot buffer and a category 3 wetland requires a 25-foot buffer. Primary access to the site would be provided off of S 38th Court. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable Mo," Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earlh Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals TransJJ{Jrtation Environmental Health Public Services Energy! Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airporl Environment 10,000 Feet -14,000 Feer \3 B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Dire~u~o~epresentative 10-'1-01 Date --------------------_ .. --_._--- l "u.lcCT LUA07-086, SA-H, EC Valley View Professional Office City of Renton Department of Planning 1 Building 1 Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENTAL APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) POLICE RELATED COMMENTS 13 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually CONSTRUCTION PHASE Theft from construction sites is one of the most commonly reported crimes in the City. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site should have security lighting, and any construction trailer or storage area should be completely fenced-in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective criminal and will demonstrate that the area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should be fitted with heavy-duty deadbolts with a minimum 1-1/2" throw when bolted. Glass windows in construction trailers should be shatter-resistant. Toolboxes and storage containers should be secured with heavy-duty padlocks and kept locked when not in use. "No Trespassing" signs should be posted on the property during the construction phase. These signs allow officers, upon contact, to provide a verbal warning to trespassers that should they be contacted on the property again, they could be cited and/or arrested. COMPLETED COMPLEX All exterior doors should be made of solid metal or metal over' wood, with heavy-duty dead bolt locks, latch guards or pry-resistant cylinders around the locks, and peepholes. If glass doors are used, they should be fitted with the hardware described above and additionally be fitted with a layer of security film. Security film can increase the strength of the glass by up to 300%, greatly reducing the likelihood of breaking glass to gain entry. Access to the back of the buildings should bb limited, preferably with security fencing, as these areas could be vulnerable to crime due to the lack of natural surveillance by passersby. It is recommended that the commercial areas be monitored with recorded security alarm systems. It's not uncommon for businesses to experience theft and/or vandalism during the hours of darkness. An auxiliary secu rity service could be used to patrol the property during those times. It is important to direct all foot traffic into the main entrance of the buildings. Any alternative employee entrances should have coded access to prevent trespassing. Page 1 of 2 If there are payphones out. the businesses, it is recommend*hey be outgoing use only. Public payphones tend to.tract drug traffic and having on""'the ability to call out on payphones severely hinders this type of activity. All areas of this project need to have adequate lighting. This will assist in the deterrent of theft from motor vehicle (one of the most common crimes in Renton) as well as provide safe pedestrian travel for customers utilizing the businesses. The structures should have building numbers clearly posted with numbers at least 6" in height and of a color contrasting with the building. This will assist emergency personnel in locating the correct location for response. Landscaping should be installed with the objective of allowing visibility -not too dense and not too high. Too much landscaping will make customers and employees feel isolated and will provide criminals with concealment to commit crimes such as burglary and malicious mischief (property destruction). It is key for a complex of this size to have approf-lriate lighting and signage. "No Trespassing" signs should be posted in conspicuous locations throughout the property, including entrances to the property and parking areas. Of particular concern is the parking garage. The parking garage at Valley Medical Center is a common target for theft from motor vehicle, and structure of this one sounds similar (there are no site plans included in with this master application package). I highly recommend that the developer have a Renton Police Crime Prevention Representative conduct a security survey of the premises once construction is complete. Page 2 of 2 r • • City of Renton Department of Planning I Building I Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Po..r-~<i COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 30, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA07-086, SA-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 16, 2007 APPLICANT: Valley View Professional Development LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dinq PROJECT TITLE: Valley View Professional Office PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 244,807 square feet BUILDING AREA (oross): 26,600 square feet LOCATION: S of S 37'h Street, W of S 38 th Street (3023059111) I WORK ORDER NO: 77793 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a 26,600 square foot combination general office and medical/dental office building and associated parking and landscaping improvements. The project site totals 244,807 square feet (5.6 acres) and is zoned Commercial Office (CO). Project construction would occur on the north portion of the project site due to steep slopes, a class 2 stream, a category 2 wetland, and a category 3 wetland ocupying the south portion of the project site. A class 2 stream requires a 100-foot buffer, a category 2 wetland requires a 50-foot buffer and a category 3 wetland requires a 25-foot buffer. Primary access to the site would be provided off of S 38th Court. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources Element of the Environment I ~ I Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts Mo," InformatIon Necessary f'trCtc:l--twvJtpar--RY2 IMi<1lZec,/ ~~Cvv}d~ C&h-zvvlr .-frYIdu~ OVhVl€d-7V/IIJ--, 'P-tR-;).., P--U~ P.t~1 ~I C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS LJ ~ aAL-1'VO.,I/lIY\ pO~ h ItVJ&. Signature of Dire?or or Authorized Representative Date .. • • NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: August 16, 2007 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA07·086, SA-H, ECF PROJECT NAME: Valley View Professional Office PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesbng Administrative Site PI~n approval and Environmental (SEPA) Rev;ew for the construction of a 26,600 square foot combination 9t'f1eral atI,ca aoo medical/dental office bUilding ami associated parlIlng and landscaping improvements. The project SIte totals 244,807 square feet (5.6 acres) and is zoned Commercial Office (COl· Project construction W<luld occur on the north portion 01 the project site due 10 steep slopes, a class 2 stream, a categol'l 2 wetland, and a category 3 wetland ocupymg the south portion 0/ the project sit". A class 2 stream Ill'quires a Too.faot buffer. a category 2 wetland ~uire$ a SO-/oot boffe! and a category 3 wetland requires e 25-1001 buffer, Primary access to the site wouk:l be prOYidad off of S 38th Court PROJECT LOCATION; South of S 37'" Street, west of S 3Bth Street OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON_StGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-MJ: As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that sJgnlllcant environmental Impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permItted under the RCW 43 21C.110, the CIty of Renton is using the Optional ONS-M process to gM! notice that a DNS- M IS likely to be Issued, Comment periods for the project and the proposed ONS-M ere Integrated into e single comment periQlj, There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Slgnlflcance- MItIgated (DNS-M). A 14-<1ay appeal period wililollow the issuance 01 the DNS-M PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: August 13. 2007 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION; August 16, 2007 APPLICANTIPROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Blnh Nguyen, VaUey View Profnslonal Development LLC; Tel; (425) 226-3522; Eml; btnhn(gorbarchltects.com Pennits/Review Rllquesled; Environmental (SEPAl Review, Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval Roquellad Studlae: Geotechnical Report, Wetlalld/Stream Study, Drainage Report and Traffice AllalYlls Location whsre application may be "viewed; PUBLIC HEARING; CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW; ZonLng/Land Un: Envlronmenlill Documenllo that Evaluate the Propa.ed Project: Development Regulation. Uel'<! For Project MItigation; PlannlnglBuUdlnglPublic WOrt.1 Department, Development Servlcel Division, Sinh Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 96057 Public hearing is tentatively scheduled tor Octgber 9 2007 before the Rentgn Hearing Examiner in Re~lQn Council Chambers, Hearings begIn al g,OO AM on Ille 7th floor 01 Ille new Renton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. The sublect Site is designated Commercial Corrldo.-(CCI on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Commercial Office (COlon the City's Zoning M.p EnVironmental (SEPAl CheCklist The project Wlil be subject to the CIty'S SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-4.(130 Development Guide~nes and Regulallons, RMC 4-6-030 Drainage and olller applicatlle codes and regulations as appropr"'te Propol8d MItigation Measures: The following MItigation Measures '>Ifill likely I:le imposed on tile proposed prOJecl These recommended Mlllgation Measures address project impacts not COIIered by existing codes and regulallons as cited above 7he appllcent Will be reqwred to pey the appropHete TranSp<lrtalion Mltigalion Fe6: The epplicant w,1I be raquired ro pay the ~pproprrate FIf9 Mrligaliofl Fee: The apprrcafll will be f9quired to pey Ihe appropriate Parl<$ MJ/iga/ion Fe6: Erosion control shell be requirod 10 comply WIth III" 2005 Depaf1ment of Ecology Siormweisr Management Mafll.le/:end Stormwa/l/rconlroJ sllall romply w'th the 2005 King County Surface Water Desigfl Manual. ,Commentll on the above Ippllcltlon must be lubmlttad In writing to Jill Ding, Senior Planner, Development ServIce. Division, 1055 South GllIdy Way, Renlon, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on August 30, 2007, This matter is allo tentatiVely scheduled for a public hurlng on October 9, 2007, al 9;00 AM, Council Chambers, Sevenlh Ffoor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton If you are interested in attendLng the hearing, please contact the Development Services DiviSion to ensure that the heanng has not been reschl/duled at (425) 430-7282, II comments cannot be submitted in wribng by the dall! indicated above, )'{)U may sllll aPfl8ar at the heanng and present )'{)ur comments on the proposal before Ihe Heanng Examiner, 11 you have questions about Ill," proposal. or wish to be made a party of record land rt'tCelVe addItional in!ormatlon by mail, please contact the project manager. Anyone who SUbmits written comments '>Ifill automatically become a party o! re<:ord and WIll be notifIed of eny decision on this project CONTACT PERSON: Jill K. Ding, Senior Plannar; Tel: (425) 430-7219; Eml: jding@cl,ranton.wa.us PLEASE iNCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project. complete this form and return to' City of Renton, Development Plarlning, 1055 So Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No_: Valley View Professiorlal Of/lce/LUAD7-086. SA-H, ECF NAME MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: CERTIFICATION I, ~ @'if"R.... , hereby certify that..3.-copies of ~he above UU'CUIJI~~~~"\\_,, were posted by me in -3-conspicuous places or nearby the descnbed property DATE: 8·,,,·tq A TrEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of W'lShiington resiidir'~n .n\ '5po -rf1p ,on the ;;lO ""-day of (2. 11 ' , '" >l • • • CITY OF RENTON . CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 16'h day of August, 2007, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter, NOA, Environmental Checklist, & PMT's documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Agencies -Env. Checklist, PMT's, & NOA See Attached Surrounding Property Owners· NOA only See Attached Sinh Nguyen -Accpt Ltr Owner/Applicant/Contact (Signature of Sender).:...: _____________________ _ STATE OF WASHINGTON SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for ~(I.\I>l\>.~and purposes mentioned in the instrument. $ ...... ~NN ~~ :or . ",~~~I;!!. I I -",." or.:c;." Dated: 8' ~()f(D . :r f ~... .~,.~ or the Sat's ington ;,~ ; S - -1'" Notary (print):J::l~~:..i.>P~...I:1J2..l:U!.~"2----~~<J\~~~,, Af:~~It'-?_~fJ~~~~E_ My appointment expires: ~ - \ '\ -I 0 II/ "$' 111t1\\\\,,"'" Project Name: Valley View Professional Office Project Number: LUA07-086, SA-H, ECF template -affidavit of service by mailing /111 OF W"S " ... ~ 11111\\\""" Dept. of Ecology' Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region' Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers' Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers' Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt • • AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Stewart Reinbold' Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. • c/o Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 3190 160·h Ave SE 39015 -172"' Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008 Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office' Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program' 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172"d Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division' Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olvmpia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 SE 72"d Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01 W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities State Department of Ecology Real Estate Services NW Regional Office Title Examiner 3190 160·h Avenue SE 700 Fifth Avenu~, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. • template· affidavit of service by mailing 855860013504 AASHIEM WALLACE L 17420 SPRINGBROOK RD RENTON WA 98055 855860018503 BATES VERLA M 9603 SOUTH 175TH ST RENTON WA 98055 302305904500 CODER MARGIE 409 S 36TH ST RENTON WA 98055 855860019501 HILL REBECCA 515 S 38TH ST RENTON WA 98055 302305913105 HOSKIN THOMAS J 9370 46TH AVE SW SEATTLE WA 98136 302305905309 LOKEN MARK 417 S 36TH ST RENTON WA 98055 302305904401 NGUYEN PHUC N 3623 TALBOT RD S RENTON WA 98055 507000018006 REMY JOHN J 408 S 37TH ST RENTON WA 98055 302305905408 SEAFIRST BANK / REIS WARD #6298162 PO BOX 34029 SEATTLE WA 98124 507000017008 THOMAN STEPHANIE 404 S 37TH ST RENTON WA 98055 • 302305905200 ACIERTO DOMINGO C+NATIVIDAD 412 S 37TH ST RENTON WA 98055 507000014005 BLISS SHIRLEY A 3604 SHATTUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 302305910903 FRARY LYNN R MD 3764 SW 171ST SEATTLE WA 98166 507000015002 HILLMAN LAWRENCE D+NANCY L 3620 SHATTUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 302305904005 HURST GERALD A C/O REESE PATTY 3619 TALBOT RD S RENTON WA 98055 761680030001 MILLER DANIEL E 9612 S 177TH ST RENTON WA 98055 302305911000 OBRIEN DANIEL N DR 10127 SE 16TH PL BELLEVUE WA 98004 855860020004 ROSS DAVID 521 S 38TH CT RENTON WA 98055 302305911109 SPRINGBROOK OFFICE PARK PO BOX 2401 KIRKLAND WA 98033 761680029003 VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER CREDIT UNION 3915 TALBOT RD #211 RENTON WA 98055 • 507000001002 AGOO SILVER D+GRACE T 3621 SHATTUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 507000005003 BOSTICK HARRY G 3527 SHATTUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 507000002000 GILLILAN ANNE LIVING TRUST 3615 SHATTUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 507000003008 HOANG BAYT 3609 SHATTUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 507000004006 KUMARAN RUDRA+SAVITRI 3603 SHATTUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 312305902602 MOSHIRI SOHRAB+YASMAN 10232 NE 10TH ST BELLEVUE WA 98004 312305906504 PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT # 1 VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER PO BOX 50010 RENTON WA 98058 302305905507 SANTUARIO JUAN CARLOS+CORONA ROSA 411 S 36TH ST RENTON WA 98055 855860019006 STRAND DALLAS+KATHLEEN R 507 S 38TH CT RENTON WA 98055 507000016000 VICTOR B 400 S 37TH RENTON WA 98055 • • plibrary.property.pir plibrary.property.pin_address.a plibrary.property. plibrary.property.rpacct_view.TAXPAYERNAIV 3023059026 3023059034 3023059037 416 S 36TH ST 3023059040 3679 TALBOT RD S 3023059043 3023059044 3623 TALBOT RD S 3023059045 409 S 36TH ST 3023059047 3517 TALBOT RD S 3023059052 412 S 37TH ST 3023059053 417 S 36TH ST 3023059054 3721 TALBOT RD S 3023059055 411 S 36TH ST 3023059060 3605 TALBOT RD S 3023059095 3023059109 3023059110 400 S 38TH CT 3023059111 3023059120 3023059131 312305902617600 TALBOT RD S 31230590653901 TALBOT RD S 3123059085 3123059136 50700000103621 SHATTUCK AVE S 50700000203615 SHATTUCK AVE S 5070000030 3609 SHATTUCK AVE S 50700000403603 SHATTUCK AVE S 50700000503527 SHATTUCK AVE S 5070000060 3521 SHATTUCK AVE S 5070000070 3509 SHATTUCK AVE S 5070000110 3510 SHATTUCK AVE S 5070000120 402 S 36TH ST 5070000130 408 S 36TH ST 50700001403604 SHATTUCK AVE S 5070000150 3620 SHATTUCK AVE S 5070000160 400 S 37TH ST 5070000170 404 S 37TH ST 5070000180 408 S 37TH ST 7616800070 17710 TALBOT RD S 7616800080 76168000909613 S 177TH ST 76168001009625 S 177TH ST 7616800290 17620 TALBOT RD S 7616800300 9612 S 177TH ST 76168003109622 S 177TH ST 76168003209630 S 177TH ST 7616800330 9720 S 177TH ST 8106301170 8558600030 3608 TALBOT RD S 8558600035 3614 TALBOT RD S 8558600040 3620 TALBOT RD S 8558600125 3704 TALBOT RD S 85586001303710 TALBOT RD S 8558600135 500 S 38TH CT CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC HOSPITAL DIST #1 98055 PEREZ DEOFAVENTE C+SUSANA 98055 HURST GERALD A WILSON PETER HARRISON 98055 NGUYEN PHUC N 98055 CODER MARGIE 98055 SHUCK COLETTE V 98055 ACIERTO DOMINGO C+NATIVIDAD 98055 LOKEN MARK 98055 SEAFIRST BANK I REIS 98055 SANTUARIO JUAN CARLOS+CORONA ROS 98055 OSBORNE KIM R WILLIAMS JOY FRARY LYNN R MD 98055 OBRIEN DANIEL N DR SPRINGBROOK OFFICE PARK WILLIAMS JOY HOSKIN THOMAS J MOSHIRI SOHRAB+YASMAN 98055 PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT #1 VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER 4A DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 98055 AGOO SILVER D+GRACE T 98055 GILLILAN ANNE LIVING TRUST 98055 HOANG BAY T 98055 KUMARAN RUDRA+SAVITRI 98055 BOSTICK HARRY G 98055 HARVEY RICHARD D & FRANCINE 98055 MOSS KATHERINE E 98055 LERNER VICTORIA P+JOSHUA D 98055 BEAN BRAD ERIC 98055 BERG BRIAN D & ANNABELLE L 98055 BLISS SHIRLEY A 98055 HILLMAN LAWRENCE D+NANCY L 98055 VICTOR B 98055 THOMAN STEPHANIE 98055 REMY JOHN J LOMBARDINI VICTORIA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER CREDIT UNION ANDEBRHAN BEYENE+WAINNIE ASHAIL CHINN DEAN MARK VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER CREDIT UNION MILLER DANIEL E JONES-POWELL RUBY L SAETEURN SAENG+LAI LE HOAI T+TU VAN POINTE @ TALBOT HILLS HOA 98055 MATNEY CINDY C 98055 LOVE BRUCE 98055 HIATT RONALD D JR+JOLENE M 98055 FOURNARAKIS NIKOLAOS 98055 PRASAD FLORENCE 98055 AASHIEM WALLACE L • • 8558600140 517 S 37TH ST 85586001453709 MORRIS AVE S 85586001503715 98TH AVE S 8558600155 516 S 38TH CT 85586001703716 MORRIS AVE S 8558600175 3722 MORRIS AVE S 8558600180 600 S 38TH CT 8558600185 501 S 38TH CT 8558600190 507 S 38TH CT 8558600195 515 S 38TH CT 8558600200 521 S 38TH CT 8558600205 601 S 38TH CT 8558600210 609 S 38TH CT 8857670040 3917 TALBOT RD S 8857670050 3921 TALBOT RD S 8857670060 400 S 43RD ST 8857670070 4033 TALBOT RD S 8857670090 4011 TALBOT RD S 8857670100 400 S 43RD ST 8857670110 3915 TALBOT RD S • 98055 SIMULESCU DOREL+MARIANA 98055 PACLEB ROBERT M+MYRA JOYCE 98055 TRUE JAMES F 98055 MOORE ERNEST+CLARICE 98055 THOMAS THERESA L 98055 HANSEN DOUGLAS J 98055 LIN MEI-CHUAN 98055 BATES VERLA M 98055 STRAND DALLAS+KATHLEEN R 98055 HILL REBECCA 98055 ROSS DAVID 98055 HEITZ JOANNE C 98055 SUTTON MAX 0 98055 PUBLIC HOSP 0ISTR#1 KING CO 98055 PUBLIC HOSP 01S#1 KING CO 98055 PUBLIC HOSP 01ST#1 KING CO 98055 AHP OF WASHINGTON INC 98055 PROPERTY MGMT NW 98055 PUBL HOSP 0ISTR#1 KING CO 98055 PUBLIC HOS DISTR#1 KING CO 0121'::'/ "'11 t... 70 l>~ ?" .... $HITT"". • City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT PROPERTY OWNER(S) TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: NAME: Valley View Professional 425-226-3522 Binhn@orbarchitects.com Development LLC PROJECT INFORMATION ADDRESS: 607 SW Grady Way #210 PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: CITY: Renton, WA ZIP: ga05,?, Valley View Professional Office Development TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425·226·3522 PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: Lot 4 of the Renton East Valley Medical Short Plat APPLICANT (if other than owner) 4xx South 381h Court, Renton, WA 98055 NAME: Same • KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): COMPANY (if applicable): 3023059111 EXISTING LAND USE(S): Vacant I Undeveloped ADDRESS: PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Business I Medical I Dental CITY: ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Not Available c,;r'.J CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): NA NAME: Sinh Nguyen EXISTING ZONING: CO Comercial Office COMPANY (if applicable): Valley View Professional PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): No Change Development LLC SITE AREA (in square feet): 244,807 ADDRESS: 607 SW GradyWay#210 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: 0 CITY: Renton, WA ZIP: 98057 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: Water @ 14,700, Power @ 50, Road/Util @ 6,936~ 21 ~ Q:web/pw/devserv/fonnsiplanning/masterapp.doc 06/11/07 , .. CT INFORMATION (writ I) PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET PROJECT VALUE: 4.5 Million (ready for lenanl improvements) ACRE (if applicable): NA IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): NA ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): NA o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): NA 0 FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL )2<{>EOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. BUILDINGS (if applicable): NA o HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL :::>,:::SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES 166,275 sq. ft. BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA , :::>,:::WETLANDS (within slream area) sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): 2 floors@ 13,300 = 26,600 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): Net lease area = 21,920 NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): Estimated at 60 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Ilellal on sheet with the information ,. SITUATE IN THE SE QUARTER OF SECTION ~, TOWNSHIP ~, RANGE_5_, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1 .. eierJIlJ§ Site Plan Approval 3. 1,61 I' ; 3 jlh. S P8F!;lits 2. SEPA • 4. i<: ~ :611 .. 2 il (99 R! ~! ~2?) Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/pJanninglmasterapp.doc 2 06111107 I .' . &OJECT INFORMATION (Contina AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) Sinh Nguyen , dadare that I am (please check one) __ the current owner of the property involved in this application or _X __ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are In all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. (Signature of Owner/Representative) Q:web/pw/devserv/forms!planninglmasterapp.doc I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that=;;;:,B~i:,n~h:"N~g~u~ye,;,n,,:::;=====;:-:: signed this Instrument and acknowledged it to be hislher/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary (Print)I_'6e=::..>"-.It,-,--,'I\-, _L:::::..:. _Jho+L-""-'W7,-,-,---,,-S ,,-0 _,1\.. __ My appointment exPires: __ ,o-_-C1_d-_f{_I_o_'1--'-__ _ 3 06/11/07 . , , " ..... ----------------------------------~ • • Section / Township / Range -5E 30 23 5 Legal Description - 302305 I I I LOT 4 CI1YOF RENTON EAST VALLEY MEDICAL PARK 5P REC AF # 7808151009 5D 5P DAF-POR 5E V4 BEG AT 5 V4 COR TH N ALG C/L OF 5D SEC 250FT TH N 89-0G-03 E 950 FT TO TROB TH N PLT N-5 C/L OF 5D SEC 421.49 FT TO WLY PROD OF SLY LN OF TR REC AF #4G87718 TH 584-17-00 E ALG SLY BDRY 5D TR $ SLY BDRY TR REC AF #4G4392G 813.94 FT TO WLY LN CO RD TH 5 OG-002-W ALG WLY LN CO RD 520.0 I FT TO N LN TR REC AF #4G9G849 TH ALG NLY LN 5D TR N 74-39-53 W G74.52 FT TO ANGLE PT TH 5 89-0G-03 W I 05 FT TO TPOB Q:web/pw/devserv/fonns!planninglmasterapp.doc 4 07/25/07 (j) AITAft1H'€r>r -rz. c t>frt-'. C f1Z00Y of' ?tGt?/tvli; A VTHe:/jlIT/) LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT DEvELOPMENT OF CITY OF RE:;"~NIIIiG VALLEY VIEW PROFE!SSIONAL DEVELOPMENT, LLC AUG .1,3 2007 (a manager-managed Washlngton,Llmlted Liability Company) RECEIVED Dated and Effective as of June 29, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1. ORGANI~ON ................................................. ; .......................................................... 1 Section 2. INTERESTS .............................................. :.: ..... ; ..... ; ............................................................. 2 Section 3. MEMBERS .................................................................................. : ..... ; ................................... 2 Section 4. MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................................... 4 Section 5. CAPIT AL ................................................................................................................................ 7 Section 6. DISTRIBUTIONS; WITHHOLDING ........ : .......................................................................... 8 Section 7. FINANCIAL MATTERS ..................................................................................................... 10 Section 8. DISSOLUTION AND UQUIDATION ...................... ~ ......................................................... 10 Section 9. TRANSFERS; ASSIGNEES; SUBSTITUTED MEMBERS ............................................... 11 Section 10. WITHDRAWAL OF MEMBERS ..................................................................................... 12 Section 11. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY; INDEMNIFICATION ................................................... 14 Section 12. LEGAL MATfERS ........................................................................................................... 14 Section 13. NOTICES ........................................................................................................................... 15 Section 14. GENERAL ............................................................................ ; ............................................ 15 EXHIBIT A -MEMBERS; INTERESTS ............... : ............................................................................... 17 EXHIBIT B ........................................................................................................................................... 18 EXHIBIT C ........................................................................................................................................... 19 ANNEX 1 .............................................................................................................................................. 20 ADDmONAL TAX PROVISIONS .................................................... , .................................................. 20 Section 1. Income and Loss ................................................................................................................... 20 Secdon 2. Special Allocations ............................................................................................................... 22 Section 3. Calculation of Tax Distributions ................................................................................. ; ........ 23 Section 4. Gross Asset Value ................................................................................................................. 24 Section S. Tax Matters Partner ................................................... : ........................................................ 25 • • INDEX OF DEFINED TERMS Adjusted Deficit 21 Member Nomecourse Debt 23 Agreement 1 Member Nomecourse Debt Minimum Gain Applicable Percentage 24 23 Approved Distributions 8 Member Nomecourse Deductions 23 Assignee 12 Members 1 Available Cash 8 Net Income 21 Buy-Sell Agreement 2 Net Loss 21 Capital Account 7 Nomecourse Deductions 23 Capital Contribution 7 Nomecourse Liability 23 Cause 6,13 Percentage Interest 2 Class 2 Percentage Interests 2 Code 10 Permitted Transfer 11 Company I Secretary 25 Company Minimum Gain 22 Substitute Member 12 Depreciation 25 Target Account 22 Dereliction of Duty 6 Tax Distributions 9 Distributions 8 Tax Matters Partner 10 Distributions In-Kind 8 Transfer II Gross Asset Value 24 Two-Thirds Vote 3 Income 20 Winding Up Year 21 Interest 2 Withdrawal Date 13 Judicial Review 25 Withdrawal for Cause 13 Liquidating Distributions 9 Withdmwal Payment 13 LLCAct 2 Withdmwn Member 13 Loss 20 Withholding 9 Majority Vote 3 rwTED LIABILITY Co~MPANY AGRE~NT Valley View Professional Development, LLC. This LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT (the "Agreement"), dated June 29,2007 (the "Agreement"), is entered into by Valley View Professional Development, LLC, a Washington limited liability company (the "Company"), the persons signing below as members (together, the "Members"), and each person who is subsequently admitted as an additional or substitute Member of the Company and becomes a party to this Agreement (also "Members"). Section .1. ORGANIZATION 1.1. Certificate of Fonnation. The Company's Certificate of Formation was filed with the Secretary of State ofthe State of Washington on March 27, 2007. The Members agree to sign and file all other certificates, notices, statements or other instruments required by law for the Company's formation and continued operation. . 1.2. Name. The Company's name is "Valley View Professional Development, lic". 1.3. Purpose. The Company's principal purpose and business is to own and operate rental real estate, to conduct any other business activities as may be legally conducted under Washington law, and to exercise all other powers necessary or reasonably connected or incidental to that purpose and business that may be legally exercised by the Company. 1.4. Term. The Company's existence will continue until and unless the Company is dissolved in accordance with Section 8. 1.5. Principal Place of Business. The Company's initial principal place of business is 607 SW Grady Way, Suite210, Renton, Washington 98057. The Members may relocate the principal pllice of business or establish additional offices at any time. 1.6. . Registered Office and Registered Agent. The Company's initial registered agent, and the address of its initial registered office in the State of Washington, are as follows: Name: BinhNguyen Registered Office: 607 SW Grady Way, Ste.210 Renton, Washington 98057 The Members may change the Company's registered office and registered agent at any time by filing a statement of change, as required by RCW 25.15.020, with the Washington Secretary of State. 1.7. Members. Each Member's name and address is listed on EXHIBIT A. Page 1 Section 2. INTERESTS 1.1. The •• address. initial Capital Contributions. a.ercentage of the Company's Interests held by each Member (collectively, the "Percentage Interests") is listed on, which will be amended from time to time to reflect changes in the Percentage Interests, or the admission of new Members. 2. I. "Interest" means the entire ownership interest of a Member in the Company at any particular time, including the right of that Member to any and all benefits to which a Member is entitled as provided in this Agreement, together with the obligations of that Member to comply with all the terms and provisions of this Agreement. The percentage of the Company's total Interests held by each Member (the "Percentage Interest',) is listed on EXJllBIT A, which will be amended from time to time to reflect changes in their relative Interests, or admission of new Members. 2.2. {Option a\:l Additional Interest •. Upon approval by a Two-Thirds Vote of the Members, the Company may issue additional Percentage Interests in the Company to the Investors or other persons, in one or more classes which have the rights, privileges, obligations and preferences, and for an aggregate offering price. Each Investor or other purchaser must execute and deliver (a) a purchase agreement in a form approved by the Manager, (b) a Consent to be Bound by LLC Agreement attached as Exhibit B, and if applicable, a Spousal Consent in the form attached as Exhibit C, and (c) a Buy-Sell Agreement in the form approved by the Manager (the "Buy-Sell Agreemenf'). Section 3. MEMBERS 3. I. Classes. The Company will initially have one class of members. The Manager shall have the authority to fix and determine and to amend the designations, preferences, limitations and relative rights (including voting rights) of additional classes of Members (each a "Class"). including those senior to or different than then existing Classes of Members. 3.2. Additional and Substituted Members. Additional Members shall be admitted only upon approval of a Majority Vote of the Members. A Permitted Transferee of all or a part of aMember's interest in the Company who is not already a Member shall be admitted as a substitute Member with respect to such interest only upon the consent of the Manager . 3.3. Powers. Except as reserved to the Manager in Section 4.2, the Members have (a) the power and authority to do any and all acts necessary or convenient to further the purposes described in this Agreement, and (b) all powers and authorities, statutory or otherwise, possessed by members oflimited liability companies under the Washington Limited Liability Company Act CRCW Ch. 25.15) (the "LLC Ad'). 3.4. Action without a Meeting. Any action that could be taken at a Member meeting. may be taken without a meeting if one or more written consents setting forth that action are signed by all the Members either before or after the action is taken and delivered to the Company. Written consents will be inserted in the minute book as if they were the minutes of a Member meeting. Page 2 3.5. Mem6er Meetings. Meetings of Members are nofrequired, but may be called by the Co~pany .or b~ .. Me~ber. ~o business sh~ll be transacte\liil any meeting of~.embers except as IS specIfied ~ notice callmg such meeting. Members. conduct or particIpate in any Member meeting through the use of any means of communication by which all Members participating in the meeting can hear each other during the meeting. Participation by that means will constitute presence in person at a meeting. 3.5.1. Notice of Meetings. The Company, or Member(s) calling the meeting, .must provide each Member with written notice stating the place, day and hour of the meeting and the purpose or purposes for which the meeting is called, not less than 24 hours or more than 20 days before the date of the meeting, either personally, .by confirmed facsimile or email transmission, or by mail. Ifmailed, that notice will be deemed to be delivered two calendar days after being deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the Members' address as it appears on the Company's records. 3.5.2. Quorum; Action. A simple majority of Interests will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at .any Member meeting, but, ifless than a quorum is present at a meeting, a majority of the Members present may adjourn the meeting without further notice. If a quorum is present when the vote is taken, the Majority Vote of the Percentage Interests present at a Member meeting will be the act of the Members, unless the vote of a greater number is required hy this Agreement, the Certificate, or the LLC Act. (a) "MajOrity Vote" means the vote, approval, consent or other action of Members entitled to act holding more than 50% of the Percentage Interests held by such Members as of the date on which the event triggering the vote, approval, consent or other action of Members occurs. (b) "Two-Thirds Vote" means the vote, approval, consent or other action of Members entitled to act holding more than 67% of the Percentage Interests as of the date on which the event triggering the vote, approval, consent or other action of Members occurs. 3.6. Proxies; For any matter on which a Member is entitled to vote, the Member may vote by proxy executed in writing by the Member or by its attorney-in-fact or agent. lbat proxy will be effective when received by the Members. A proxy will become invalid 11 months after the date of its execution, unless otherwise provided in the proxy. 3.7. Conflicts oCInterest. Each Member agrees that any other Member or any affiliate of any Member may engage in or possess an interest in other business ventures of every kind and description, independently or with others. Each Member authorizes, consents to and approves of that activities, whether or not any that activities may conflict with any interest of the Company or any of the Members. However, Members must disclose any activities that may conflict with the interests of the Company or other Members, before beginning that activity. The Members agree that neither the Company nor the other Members has any rights in or to that activity, or any of its profits. Page 3 Section 4. MANAGEMENT 4.1. Mana. Qnalificatlon. The Company will be m.ged by a "Manager'. The Company will have at least one Manager at all times and may liave such other number of Managers as may be fixed from time to time (a) by ihis Agreement, or (b) by the Manager with the consent of the Members by a Two-Thirds Vote. Managers may, but need not, be Members of the Company. The initial number and name(s) of the Manager(s) is set forth on EXHIBIT A- MEl'v1BERS; INTERESTS. 4.2. Authority of Manager. 4.2.1. Generally. The Manager has the sole and exclusive right and power, acting alone (except as provided in Section 4.2.3), to manage the business and affairs of the Company, including the right and power to cause the Company to exercise any or al1 of its powers under the Act and under this Agreement or as prescribed from time to time by any resolution approved by the Manager and a Two-Thirds Vote of the Members. The Manager wil1 have any other duties and responsibilities prescribed in this Agreement. The Manager will preside at all meetings of the Members. 4.2.2. Officers, Employees and Agents. The Manager may delegate any duties and responsibilities to the Company's officers, if any. The Manager may hire employees and independent contractors to perform services related to the business of the Company, and may also appoint any other agents of the Company. and pay them reasonable compensation for their services as fixed from time to time by the Manager. Any employee, independent contractor, or agent hired or appointed by the Manager may be removed by the Manager at any time with or without cause. . 4.2.3. Limitations on Members. No Member has, or wil1 be deemed to have, any right to participate in the management of the Company beyond any Voting Rights held by that Member, unless such Member is also the Manager. Unless authorized to do so by this Agreement or by the Manager, no Member acting in that capacity wil1 have any power or authoritY to (a) bind or obligate the Company in anyway, (b) pledge the Company's credit, or (c) render the Company liable for any purpose. 4.3. Restrictions on Manager's Authority. 4.3.1. Two-Thirds Vote Required. Without the consent ofa majority of the Interests, the Manager will not have the authority to: ( a) pursue any business purpose other than that descnoed in Section 1.3 or take any action which would make it irnposstole to carry on the ordinary business of the Company, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement; (b) sel1, lease, exchange or otherwise dispose of al1 or substantial1y al1 of the Company's property, other than in its ordinary course of business (c) enter into or consummate any agreement concerning the merger, consolidation or other business combination involving the Company ·with any other person; Page 4 (d) take any steps to dissolve the Company, or • l~an Company funds or assets to an.estor Member, Manager, Assignee, or other Person; (f) issue any additional Interests, except as provided in otherwise in trus Agreement; (g) require the Investor Members to make additional Capital Contributions pursuant to Section 5.1.2. (h) take any action that is contrary to tills Agreement. 4.3.2. Unanimous Vote Required. The unanimous affirmative vote of the Members, in addition to the approval of the Manager, will be necessary for the Manager to: (a) require any Member to guarantee Company debt, or (h) require any Member to make additional Capital Contributions, or (c) take any other action requiring a unanimous vote ofthe Members under this Agreement. . 4.4. Obligations of Manager. 4.4.1. Discharge of Management Duties. The Manager will discharge the Manager's duties in good faith, pursuant to this Agreement and the Act. The Manager will . exercise the care an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would exercise under similar circumstances and in a manner the Manager reasonably believes to be in the best interests of the Company. The Manager will cause the Company to conduct its business, operations and affairs separately from those of the Manager, any Member or any Affiliate of the Manager or any Member. 4.4.2. Time Commitment. The Manager is required to devote only such time to the Company's affairs as the Manager reasonably determines is necessary to manage and operate the Company and to perform the Manager's duties to the Company, using rus best efforts to maximize the Company's success. The Manager, acting in an individual capacity, may engage in any other activities without having or incurring any obligation to. offer any interest in such activities to the Company or any Member, except that the Manager will not engage in any activity prohibited under Section 4.4 or elsewhere in this Agreement. 4.5. Compensation and Relmbnrsement. 4.5.1. Compensation. The Company will pay the Manager such compensation for acting as Manager and for performing services as an employee ofthe Company (a) as a Two- Thirds Vote of the Members may approve, or (b) as set forth in any sepamte employment . agreement between the Company and the Manager that is approved by a Two-Thirds Vote of the Members. 4.5.2. Reimbursement. The Company will reimburse the Manager for (a) all out-of-pocket expenses that the Manager incurs on behalf of the Company, including expenses relating to the formation of the Company and amounts paid· to any person to perform services on PageS behalf of the Compariy, and any expenditures incurred by the Manager while conducting the Company's business, a~) other expenses paid by the Manager th.lliil.re necessary and appropriate to the cond.,fthe Company's business, including wi. limitation, rent and other office expenses, travel expenses, compensation expenses of employees and agents, accounting and legal fees, and general overhead. 4.5.3. Term. A Manager will hold office from the date of appointment under Section 4.1, until the Manager resigns or is removed under Section 4.5.4 or Section 4.5.5. 4.5.4. Resignation. A Manager may voluntarily resign as Manager upon 30- days' written notice to any other Mariager or Managers and to all the Members. Such resignation will not constitute a breach of this Agreement. The notice will specify the effective date of the Manager's resignation. Unless otherwise specified in any notice of resignation, the acceptance of a Manager's resignation is not necessary to make it effective. The Manager may not voluntarily resign as Manager without the consent of a Supermajority Percentage Interest of the Investor Members (not including the Manager's vote to the extent, if any, that the Manager is an Investor Member). 4.5.5. Removal. A Manager may be removed only upon the affirmative unanimous vote of the Members (not including the Manager's vote to the extent, if any, that the Manager is a Member) for. Cause. "Cause," means: (a) the Manager has misappropriated Company funds or other property, or (b) the Manager has been convicted of, or has pled nolo contendere to, any felony or any crime involving moml turpitude, or (c) the Manager has engaged in illegal, dishonest, or fraudulent conduct, not otherwise covered by this Section 4.5.5, that subjects the Company to material financial loss. (d) thl' Manager has not cured a Dereliction of Duty (i) witrun 30 days after receiving written notice specifying the Dereliction of Duty signed by Two-Thirds Vote of the Members, or (ii) without further notice, if the Manager has been notified of a Dereliction of Duty I or more times during the preceding 12-month period, or a total of more than 2 times. "Derelicti()n of Duty" means the Manager's persistent neglect or material or cumulative negligence in the performance of the Manager's obligations and duties under this Agreement, or willful and repeated failure to perfonn the Manager's obligations under this Agreement. 4.5.6. Effect on Status as Member. The death or adjudicated incompetence of a Manager who is also a Member will not affect its Interest. The resignation or removal of a Manager who is also a Member will not affect the Manager's rights as a Member nor constitute a withdrawal of the Manager as a Member. 4.6. Vacancies. Any vacancy occurring for any reason in the position of Manager will be filled by a person approved by the Members by a Two-Thlrds Vote of the Members. Page 6 " 4.7. Right to Rely on the Manager. . 4.7.1. ~ature. Subject to obtaining any requir~roval of the Members, the Manager's signature wil! be sufficient to (a) acquire and convey title to any Company property, (b) sign any promissory notes, security agreements, trust deeds, mortgages or other instruments of hypothecation, or ( c) sign any other agreements or documents necessary to effectuate any provision of this Agreement or to carry out the purposes or business of the Company. A copy of, or an excerpt from, this Agreement may be shown to the requesting parties in order to confirm such authority. 4.7.2. Apparent Authority. Any person dealing with the Company may rely (without duty of further inquiry) upon a certificate signed by the Manager as to: (a) the identity of any Owner, Manager officer, employee or agent of the Company, (b) the existence or nonexistence of any fact or facts that constitute a condition precedent to acts by the Manager, any agent of the Company or any Owner, or that relate to the business or affairs of the Company, (c) the persons that are authorized to execute and deliver any instrument or document of the Company, (d) any act or failure to act by the Company, or (e) any other matter involving the Company, any agent of the Company, or any Owner, that involves the apparent conduct of the Company's business in its ordinary course. Section S. CAPITAL 5.1. "Capital Contribution" means the amount of money and the initial Gross Asset Value (see ANNEX 1) of any non-monetary property that a Member contributes to the Company. Each Founder has made the initial Capital Contribution to the Company as listed on EXHIBIT A. Except as specifically provided in this Agreement, no Member will (a) be entitled to interest on any Capitsl Contribution, (b) have the right to withdraw or to demand the return of all or any part of its Capital Contribution, (c) have personal liability for the repayment of the Capitsl Contribution of any other Member, or Cd) have any obligation to make additional capitsl contributions, loans or advances to the Company. 5.1.2. Additional Contributions to Fund Operations. If the Company needs additional equity to conduct its business as contemplated in Section 1.3, then the Manager may make one or more calls for additional capital contributions from the Members. However (a) the total amount of the calls for additional Capital Contributions under this Section 5.1.2 shall not . exceed the greater of $ or per each 1% of Interest, and (b) the Manager must provide the Members with documentation of the. Company's use of the additional Capitsl Contributions. The Members shall make any additional Capital Contributions under this Section 5.1:20n a pro rata basis in accordance with their respective Perceotage Interests within 30 days following the date of delivery of such call for additional Capital Contributions or within such other time frame as specified in the call for additional Capital Contributions issued by the Manager. 5.2. "Capital Account" means the Capital Account established on the books ofthe Company for each Member and maintained in accordance with the provisions of Treasury Regulation Section 1.704-1 (b )(2)(iv). The Members wilJ make all determinations necessary or appropriate to comply with that Treasury Regulation. Page 7 • 5.2.1. Adjustments. Each Member's Capital Account will (a) increase with Income allocated to the ~ber, and the Member's additional caPitalio~tribUtiOnS, and (b) decrease with all distrib.s made to the Member and Losses alloc the Member. (See Section 5.3 and ANNEX 1.) 5.22. Deficit Capital Accounts. Regardless of any differing custom or rule of law, any deficit in a Member's Capital Account will not be an asset of the Company, and that Member will not be obligated to contribute that amount to the Company to bring that Member's Capital Account balance to zero. . 5.3. Net Income and Net Loss. After giving effect to the additional provisions, special allocations, and limitations contained in ANNEX 1, Net Income and Net Loss will be allocated among the Members' Capital Accounts for each taxable year so as to make, as nearly as possible, the Members' Adjusted Capital Account (see ANNEX 1) balances stand in the ratio of . the Members' respective Interests. Section 6. DISTRIBUTIONS; WITHHOLDING 6.1. Distributions. The Members may approve the Company to make distributions to the Members from time to time, as permitted by the LLC Act However, no distribution will be made if prohibited under the LLC Act or this Agreement. "Distriblltions" means all Approved Distributions, Tax Distnbutions, and Liquidating Distnbutions, collectively (as those terms are defioed below). . 6.2. Approved Distributions. Except as otherwise provided in this Section 6, the Company will only distribute Available Cash and Distributions In-Kind (defioed below) in the amounts and at the times approved by the Members ("Approved Distriblltions"). The Company will distnbute Approved Distributions among the Members in accordance with their respective Interests on the last day of the distribution period, except as otherwise provided in (a) Section 6.3 with respect to distnbutions to satisfy certain tax obligations of the Members, and (b) Section 6.4 in connection with the liquidation of the Company or elsewhere in this Agreement. 6.2.2. "Available Cash" means all funds of the Company on hand or in bank accounts of the Company that is available for distribution to the Members after provision has been made for (a) payment of all of the Company's then-current operating expenses, (b) payment of all of the Company's outstanding and unpaid then-current obligations, and (c) an amount of reserves as the Members deem necessary or appropriate for Company operations. 6.2.3. DlstributlonS'ln-Klnd. The Members may approve the in-kind distnbution of the Company's assets to the Members ("Distriblltions In-Kintf'). Distributions In- Kind will be made based on the asset's Gross Asset Value (see ANNEX 1) on the date of distribution, and in the manner listed for Approved Transactions. After any Distnbution In-Kind, the Members may elect to (a) revalue the Gross Asset Value of all ora portion of the Company's remaining assets, and (b) adjust the Members' respective Capital Accounts accordingly, in the manner provided under this Agreement, in order to preserve the economic interests of the Members. 6.3. Tax Dlstrlbntlons. Page 8 , 6.3.1. No later than 90 days after the close ofea~hFiscal Year, the Company will make cash diStribU.· s to the Members in order to cover paym.fthe amount oftax incurred by the Membe a result of receiving an ailocation of the pany's Income or Loss ("Tax Distributions''). The amount of each Tax Distribution will be calculated according to Annex Section 3. Members must have held interests in the Company at the close of the applicable Fiscal Year in order to be entitled to a Tax Distribution for that Fiscal Year. The Members will make every reasonable effort to ensure that for any quarter of the Company's taxable year, Available Cash is no less than the aggregate Tax Distribution Amounts due to all , Members. However, the Company will not be required to make Tax Distributions more than its Available Cash. 6.3.2. Tax Distributions will,be (a) deemed applied to any cash Approved Distributions already paid during that Fiscal Year, and (b) applied against any unpaid Approved Distributions, except to the extent that those distributions were required to satisfy the obligations of the Company under Section 6.2 in respect of one or more prior Fiscal Years. This Section 6.3.2 will only apply for purposes of determining whether the Company has satisfied its obligation to make Tax Distributions. 6.4. Liquidating Dlstribntlons 6.4.1. To effect the dissolution and liquidation of the Company under Section 8, the Members will distribute al1 assets of the Company to the Members in cash or in-kind in accordance with Section 6.4.2 ("Liquidating Distributions"). Any Distributions In-Kind wil1 be distributed based upon their respective Gross Asset Values on the date ofthe Liquidating Distribution. 6.4.2. The net cash proceeds resulting from a Liquidating Distribution wil1 be distributed and applied in the following order of priority: (a) to the payment of the expenses ofliquidation and the debts and liabilities of the Company then due, other than debts and liabilities owing to the Members; (b) to the payment of debts and liabilities owing to the Members payable up to the date that the distribution ofthe Company's assets is completed; (c) to the setting up of any reserves that the Members determine are reasonably necessary for any contingent or unforeseen liabilities or obligations of the Company; and (d) to and among the Members in proportion to their respective positive Capital Account balances after all allocations have been made pursuant to this Section 6.4.2 and ANNEX 1 for all periods preceding that distribution. 6.5. Tax Withholding on Distributions 6.5.1. Compliance. The Company will comply with all tax withholding requirements under Federal, state, local, or foreign law and will remit the'withheld amounts ("Withholding'') to, and file any form required to be filed in connection with that Withholding Page 9 ., ~th, the applicable taxing jurisdiction, In the event ofimy claimed over-Withholding, Members WIll proceed against th_plicable taxing jurisdiction, and not agai~e Company, in'order to obtam a refund of the tWned amount Each Member agrees to fun'lII!' the Company with any representations and forms as will reasonably be requested by the Company to assist it in determining the extent of, and in fulfilling, its Withholding obligations. 6.5.2. Payment. The Company will treat all Withholdings as Approved Distributions. If the Withholding was not paid from actual distributions, the Company may, at its option, (a) require the Member to reimburse the Company on demand for the Withholding, or (b) reduce the amount of any subsequent distributions to that Member by the amount of the Withholding. Withholdings reimbursed to the Company by a Member will under no circumstances constitute a Capital Contribution. Section 7. FINANCIAL MATTERS 7.1. Tax Matters. The Members will report all items of income, gain, loss, deduction and credit of the Company, computed as proVided in this Agreement, on each Member's federal income tax return. The Company's Tax Matters Partner, as required by Section 6231 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("Code"), is indicated on EXHIBIT A (the "Tax Matters Partney"). The duties, authorities, and indemnification of the Tax Matters Partner are set forth on ANNEX 1. 7.2. Accounting and Records. The Company will maintain records and accounts of all of its operations and expenditures. At a minimum the Company will keep at its principal place of business each of the originals or copies of the Company's (a) current list and past list, setting forth the full name and last known mailing address of each Member, (b) the Certificate of Formation and this Agreement, all amendments, and any prior versions of those documents that are no longer in effect~ and (c) financial statements and fedeml, state, and local tax returns and reports, if any, for the three most recent years. ' 7.3. Related-Party Transactions Loans •. The Company may (a) obtain loans from one or more Members upon that terms and conditions as approved by the Members, and (b) enter into dealings with third parties haVing a financial or other relationship with any Member, so long as that dealings are on terms no less favorable to the Company thari are afforded to unrelated third parties in comparable transactions. Section 8. DISSOLUTION AND LIQUIDATION. 8.1. Events of Dissolution. The Company will dissolve upon the first occurrence of one of the following: (a) the written statement of the Members, or (b) the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of the Company's assets, unless otherwise determined by the Members in writing. Page 10 • •• • 8.2. No Dissolution. The Company will not illssolve ~pon the occurrence of any Member's dissociationadescribed in RCW 25.15.130. Upon the.t of a Member's dissociation, the busin'-'fthe Company will be continued by the ining Member(s) and by the Member's successor, if any, including amendment this Agreement and admission of additional members. In addition, the Company will not be dissolved upon any Member's bankruptcy (voluntary or involuntary), dissolution, death, or permanent disability. 8.3. Liquidation upon Dissolution and Winding Up. Upon the Company's dissolution, the Members will wind up the affairs of the Company as follows: (a) a full account of the Company's assets and liabilities will be taken, (b) the assets will be promptly liquidated and the proceeds from that liquidation applied as required by the LLC Act, and (c) upon discharging all debts and liabilities, all remaining assets will be distributed to the Members or the Members' representative(s). Section 9. TRANSFERS; ASSIGNEES; SUBSTITUTED MEMBERS 9.1. Restrictions on Transfer. No Member will Transfer an Interest to any third party, unless it is a Pennitted Transfer under this Agreement or under the Buy-Sell Agreement. "Transfer' means any sale, exchange, transfer, gift, encumbrance, assignment, pledge, mortgage or other hypothecation or other disposition, whether voluntary or involuntary. "Pennitted Transfer" ineans (a) a Member's sale, transfer or assignment of an Interest to another Member of the Company; (b) any transfer of the Interest by way of succession or testamentary disposition .' upon the death of a Member or to a successor trustee or fiduciary; (c) the Transferofa Member's Interest to a spouse or lineal descendent or a trust, partnership, limited liability company, corporation or similar entity controlled by the Member for the benefit of that Member's spouse or lineal descendants; or (d) the Transfer of the Interest to any parent or subsidiary of any entity Member, the beneficial owners of which are substantially the same as the Member. 9.2. Conditions to Transfer. The Company need not recognize for any purpose any assignment or Transfer of all or any frsction of an Interest, unless it is a Permitted Transfer and: 9.2.1. the Member has reimbursed the Company for all its actual costs in connection with the Transfer, including any advice or opinion of counsel required by this Agreement, or otherwise in connection with that Transfer; 9.2.2. the Company has received that evidence of the authority of the parties to that Transfer, including certified corporate resolutions and certificates of fiduciary authority, as its counsel may request; 9.2.3. the Member has provided the other Members with sufficient information to allow them to determine that the Transfer will not result in any of the consequences referred to in Section 2.2 and as to the effect of the proposed Transfer on the number· of beneficial owners of the Company's Interests for purposes of Section 3( c )(1) of the Investment Company Act of 1940; and 9.2.4. there has been filed with the Company and recorded on the Company's books a duly executed and acknowledged counterpart of the instrument making that Transfer which represents that those Transfer was made in accordance with all applicable laws and Page 11 regulations (including investor suitability requirements) and that in all other respects is .. satisfactory in form awubstance to the Members. • 9.3. Assignment. 9.3.1. Statns of Membership. Any Member that assigos all of its Interestlo a third party who is not a Member (an ''Assignee''), will cease to be a Member. However, unless and until the Assignee is admitted as a member in the Assigning Member's stead, the assigning Member will retain the statutory rights of an assignor of an Interest under theLLC Act. 9.3 .2. Assignee's Rights. The rights of an Assignee that does not become a Substitute Member will be limited to receipt of its share of (a) cash or property distributions as determined under Section 6, and (b) Net Income and Net Losses (or any other items of Company income, gain, loss and deduction) as determined under Section 5.3. 9.3.3. Effective Date. An Assignee (whether or not admitted as a Substituted Member) will be recognized as that on the first day of . the calendar month following the month in which the requirements of Section 9.1 have been fully satisfied. 9.3.4. Third-Party Representatives. The receiver or trustee of a Member in and the estate or personal representative of a deceased or incapacitated Member, has all the rights of that Member for the purpose of (a) settling or managing its estate and (b) assigning all or any part of the Member's Interest to an Assignee, and (c) joining with the Assignee in satisfying conditions to the Assignee becoming a Member. 9.3.5. Assignment by Assignee. An Assignee that does not become a Substituted Member (as defined below), and that desires to make a further assignment of an Interest, is subject to all the provisions of Section 9.1 to the same extent and in the same manner as ifthe AsSignee were a Member. 9.4. "SlIbsdtllte Member" means an Assignee that satisfies all of the following. conditions: (a) the instrument of assignment sets forth the intentions of the assigning Member that the Assignee succeed to the Transferred Interest as a Member in its place; (b) the Assignee has agreed in writing to be bound by this Agreement; (c) the Assignee has reimbursed the Company for all its actual costs in connection with its substitution as a Member; and (d) the non- Transferring Members have unanimously consented to that substitution, which they may grant or withhold in each Member's sole discretion. Section 10. WITHDRAWAL OF MEMBERS 10.1. Consent to Withdraw. No Member has the right to withdraw from the Company without the prior consent of the other Members, which consent may not be unreasonably withheld. 10.2. Company Continuation and Management. If any Member withdraws from the Company, the Company will not dissolve and the remaining Member or Members will continue the business of the Company in accordance with this Agreement. Page 12 • • 10.3. Required Withdrawal. A Member will be deemed to have withdrawn as a Member if Members h\iiling two-thirds or more of the Company's .ests requires a Member to withdraw for Cause (".drawalfor Cause"). Withdrawal for Ca.will be effective on the date specified in a written notice to that Member, which is on or after the date of that notice. "Cause" means any of the following acts by a Member (a) conviction for a felony involving moral turpitude, (b) dishonesty or engaging in conduct that is demonstrably injurious to the Company, or (c) violation of any of the material tenns of that Member's employment with the Company which is not remedied within 30 days after written notice from the Members. 10.4. Effect of Withdrawal. 10.4.1. Cause; Bankruptcy. Upon a Withdrawal for Cause or a Bankruptcy Withdrawal, the Member (the "Withdrawn Member") forfeits all rights to its Interest in the Company and has no Interest in the Company after the date of withdrawal (the "Withdrawal Dati'). . 10.4.2. Withdrawal Payment. The Withdrawn Member will be entitled only to receive an amount equal to the lesser of (the "Withdrawal Payment'): (a) its Capital Account balance determined as of the Withdrawal Date without any revaluation of assets of the Company to fair market value; or (b) the fair market value of the Withdrawn Member's Interest, assuming the Company (i) sold all of its assets for their fair market value determined by the other Members as of the Withdrawal Date, (ii) satisfied all liabilities, and (iii) distributed the remaining liquidation proceeds among the Members (including the Withdrawn Member). 10.4.3. Payout Exclusions. The Withdrawn Member will not at any time be entitled to share in any (a) items of Net Income, Net Losses or Net Cash Flow accruing after the Withdrawal Date or (b) assets of the Company distributed to Members at any time after the Withdrawal Date, and will not be entitled to any other amount or interest on the amount owed on the Withdrawal Payment. 10.4.4. Subordination. The Withdrawal Payment will be subordinate to all debts and obligations of the Company and will be subject to loan restrictions and covenants on the part of the Company. 10.4.5. Distributions. The Withdrawn Member will be entitled to participate in Distributions, or upon termination of the Company, until the total Distributions to the Withdrawn Member after the Withdrawal Date equals the Withdrawal Payment. Page 13 ",.j! .... Section 11. LIMITk.:'ION OF LIABILITY; INDEMNIFICAhDN. 11.1. LimiAm of Liability. The Members will have .ability to the Company for monetary damages forTe Members' conduct, except for (a) acts or omissions that involve a breach of this Agreement, (b) intentional misconduct, (c) a knowing violation oflaw, (d) conduct violating RCW 25.15.235, or (e) any transaction fromwhich the Members has personally received a benefit in money, property or services to which the Members was not legally entitled. If the LLC Act is amended to authorize Company action further limiting the personal liability of members, then the liability of the Members will be eliminated or limited to the full extent permitted by the LLC Act, as so amended. No repeal or modification of the LLC Act or of this Section 11.2 will adversely affect any right or protection of the Members existing at the time of that repeal or modification for or with respect to an act or omission of the Members occurring before that repeal or modification. 11.2. Indemnification. 11.2.1. Scope of Right. The Company will indemnify each Member from and against any judgments, settlements, penalties, fines or expenses incurred in a proceeding to which the Member is a party by virtue of their status as a Member, except for (a) acts or omissions that involve a breach of this Agreement, (b) intentional misconduct, (c) a knowing violation oflaw, (d) conduct violating RCW 25.15.235, or (e) any transaction from which the Member has personally received a benefit in money, property or services to which the Member was not legally entitled. The right to indemnification conferred in this Section 11.2.1 will be a contract right and will include the right to be paid by the Company the expenses incurred in defending any that proceeding in advance of its final disposition. However,.the Company will only pay those expenses before the final disposition of a proceeding if the Member provides it with a written undertaking to repay all advanced amounts if it is ultimately determined that the Member is not entitled to indemnification under this Section 11.2 or otherwise. 11.2.2. Non-Exclnslve Remedy. The right to indemnification and payment of expenses incurred in defending a proceeding in advance of its final disposition conferred in this Section 11.2 will not be exclusive of any other rightthat the Members may have, now or in the future, under any statute, this Agreement or otherwise. 11.2.3. Subsequent Changes. No repeal or modification of the LLC Act or this Section 11.2 will adversely affect any right of the Members to indemnification existing at the time of that repeal or modification for or with respect to indemnification related to an act or omission of the Members occurring prior to that repeal or modification. SeCtion 12. LEGAL MATTERS 12.1. Dispnte Resolution. The parties will first make a good faith effort to settle by negotiation any dispute regarding this Agreement or the Company. If a settlement has not been reached within 15 days of commencing such negotiation, the dispute will be submitted to binding arbitration by a mutually acceptable arbitrator. lfthe parties cannot agree on an arbitrator, then each party will select one arbitrator, and those two arbitrators will select a third arbitrator who will conduct the arbitration. Any arbitration under this Section will be conducted in Bellevue, Washington, pursuant to the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Page 14 , .. , ;. Association then in eHect. Notwithstanding the above, this SectioirWill not apply to (a) actions for equitable relief, or C\ilictions to enforce any arbitration award .• y action under the preceding clause (a) or.each party waives any right to a jury tria 12.2. Governing Law; Legal Fees and Costs. 11ris Agreement will be construed and enforced exclusively under the internal laws of the State of Washington. The parties consent to the jurisdiction of and venue in any appropriate court in King County, Washington. The substantially prevailing party in any arbitration or litigation concerning this Agreement is entitled to reimbursement of its court costs and attorney fees by the non-prevailing party, including that costs and fees as may be incurred on appeal or in a bankruptcy proceeding. Section 13. NOTICES The parties will deliver any notices required under this Agreement in writiog by personal or courier delivery, facsimile transmission, or by registered or certified U.S. mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, to address set forth next to the parties' signatures, or on EXHIBIT A, or to such other address as specified by a party in writing. Notices will be deemed effective as of the date of personal or courier delivery, confirmed facsimile transmission, or the date on the U.S. postmark affixed to the notice. SectIon 14. GENERAL Each of the parties will execute all documents and take all further actions, as may be reasonably required or desirable to carry out the provisions of this Agreement. 11ris Agreement is binding upon and is for the benefit of the Members and the Members' respective heirs, estates; legal and personal representatives, successors and Permitted Transferees. If any portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid by a court having jurisdiction, the remaining terms of this Agreement will ·remain in full force and effect to the extent possible. The failure of a party to enforce any provision of this Agreement at any time will not be construed to be a waiver of that provision or of the subsequent right to enforce that provision or any other provision of this Agreement. No waiver by a party, either express or implied, of any provision in this Agreement will be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach of that or any other provision. None of the provisions of this Agreement wilJ be for the benefit of or enforceable by any creditors of the Company. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties, and supersedes all previous agreements, written or oral, with regard to its subject matter. Any agreement to waive or modify any term of this Agreement must be in writing signed by all Members. 11ris Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of which will constitute one and the same instrument. Signatures appear on the follOWing page. Page 15 UC Agreement Signature Page I." ... • • Signed as of the first date written above. COMPANY: Valley View Professional Development, LLC BY~ Binh Nguye;l,M8I1iIg Page 16 EXHIBIT A -MEMBERS; INTERESTS l 'II ,. .. •. • • Initial Member Member Address % Capitlll Nature of Contribution Contribution $ Binh Nguyen 45% $628,000 Cash BinhTmn 45% $628,000 Cash Geoff Anderson 5% $69,800 Cash Rick 5% $69,800 Cash Charbonneau Page 17 . '. • • CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: May 10, 2007 TO: Pre-Application File No. 07-033 FROM: Jill K. Ding, Senior Planner x 7219 SUBJECT: Valley View Professional OffIce General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development.and pennlttlng Issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of . Renton by the applicant and the codes In effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that Information cxintained in this summary may be subject to modiflcatlonand/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by'City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50, plus tax, from the Finance DIvision on the first floor of City Hall. Development Regulations are also available for review at no charge In the office of the City Cieri< on the 71ki floor, at Development SerVices on the 6th floor, at the Renton Library, and online at , www.rentonwa.gov. Project Proposal: The proposal Is to construct a two-story 26,600 square foot .bullding with a 19,200 square foot underground pari<ing garage. The building would contain approximately 25% office space and 75% medical/dental space. 53 pari<ing spaces would be provided around the building In a surface parking lot. The project site totals 5.62 acres. The subject site is located at 4XX S 341h Court (parcel ,3023059111) within the Commercial Office (CO) zoning deSignation. The subject site contains steep slopes, landslide hazards, an erosion hazard, a seismic hazard, and a Class II stream. In addition It appears that a portion of the Panther Creek Wetlands may extend onto the subject site. Access to the subject site Is provided via S 3a1h Place with secondary access proposed off of S 371ki Street . Zoning: ' The intent of the CO zone Is to provide areas appropriate for professional, administrative, and business offices and related uses, offering high quality and' amenity wori< environments. In addition, a mix of limited retail and service uses may be allowed to primarily support other uses within the zone, subject to special conditions. Limited light industrial activities, which can effectively blend in with an office environment, are allowed, as are medical institutions and related uses. In addition Restrictive Covenants have been recorded on the subject site, which provide regulations more that are more restrictive that the CO requirements. Staff recommends that the applicant contact an attorney and look Into having the covenants released. Pre()1-OlJ (CO Valley Vicw Office).doc .... ' . --", • • Development Standards: The proposal's compliance with the CO zone development standards and the parking regulations is addressed below: Lot Coverage -The maximum building lot coverage permitted In the CO zone is 65% of the total lot area or 75% if parking is provided within the building or within a parking garage. The building footprint of the proposed s,tructures totals approximately 13,300 square feet and would result In a lot coverage cif 5 percent, which is well below the maximum lot coverage requirements. Setbacks -The minimum required front yard and side yard along a street setbacks In the CO zone are 15 feet if the proposed building is less than 25 feet in height, 20 feet if the proposed building is 25-80 feet In height. and 30 feet If the proposed building Is over 80 feet In height. No interior side yard setbacks are required as no side yards abut a residential zone. A 15- foot rear yard setback is required as the rear property line abuts a residential zoned. As proposed the structures would comply with the required setback areas. Landscaping -The landscaping regulations (RMC section 4-2-1208) require a 15-foot sight- obscuring landsceped strip along street frontages adjacent to a residential zone. A 15-foot sight-obscuring landscaped strip Is also required along the side and rear property lines where the property abuts a residential zone. In addition,the Parking Regulations, RMC section 4-4-080F.7, require that any landscaping within a parking area be a minimum of 5 feet In width. For parking lots with between 51 and 99 stalls, the minimum amount of landscaping within the parking lot required Is 25 square feet per parking space. The proposal for 53 surface parking stalls would require 1,325 square feet of landscaping within the parking area. Street trees shall be placed at the average minimum rate of one tree every 30 lineal feet of street frontage. In addition to the required street trees, an additional tree for every 6 parking spaces Is required. Shrub!;! shall be planted at the rate of 5 per 100 square feet of landscape area, up to 50% of the shrubs may be deciduous. Groundcover shall be planted in sufficient quantities to provide at least 90% coverage of the planting area within 3 years of installation. Each parking space must be within 50 feet of a landscaped area. All landscaped areas shall be irrigated or consist of drought resistant plants. Height -The CO zone allows a maximum building height of 250 feet. The proposed building would be 2-stories in height; therefore staff anticipates that the proposal would comply with the height requirements. Screening -Screening must be provided for all surface-mounted and roof top utility and mechanical equipment. In addition, garbage dumpsters and recyclable areas must be screened pursuant to RMC section 4-4-090.C.7. Approval of the proposed locations of dumpster areas by Rainier Waste Management Is recommended prior to the submittal of the formal land use application. The site plan application will need to include elevations and details for the proposed methods of screening. A minimum 012 square feet per 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area is required for recyclable deposit areas and 4 square feet per 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area is required for refuse deposit areas. Based on the propoSal for a 26;600 square foot building a minimum of 53 square feet of recyclable areas and 106 square feet of refuse deposit areas are required. Outdoor refuse and recyclable deposit areas shall not be located within 50 feet or a . residentially zoned property. PmJ7.o33 (CO Vaney View Office).doc • • . Access/Parking -It appears that the primary access to the site is proposed via S 3Bth Place and secondary access is proposed off of S 37'" Street. The proposal is required to accommodate a minimum number of off street parking spaces for the proposed use. The number of spaces required for a medical office use is 0.5 spaces per 100 square feet of net floor area as defined In RMC 4-11-060. The number of spaces required for a general office use is a minimum of 3 per 1,000 square feet of net floor area to a maximum of 4.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of net floor area. Based on the proposal for 25% office and 75% medical/dental space, parking would be required as follows: For 5,480 net square feet of office space a minimum of 16 spaces would be required and a maximum of 25 spaces would be permitted. For 16,440 net square feet of medical/dental space a total of 82 spaces would be required. The total number of spaces required for the project would be between 98 and 107 spaces. The materials submitted by the applicant Indicated that a total of 99 parking :spaces would be provided on site, which Is wHhin the required range of parking spaces. 'Based on the 99 stalls.proposed, 4 of those are required to be ADA ;accesslble. Standard parking spaces (Surface/Private Garage/Private carport) must comply with the following minimum dimensions for standard and compact stalls: • Standard stalls must have a minimum length of 20 feet and a minimum width of 9 \l ~a~ ~ • Compact stalls must have a minimum length of 16 feet and a minimum width of 8 I:L %~~ ~ Compact parking spaces are not allowed to exceed 30% of the total parking provided for ~ standard parking areas. Standard parking stall size within a structured parking garage must comply with the following t minimum dimensions for standard and compact stalls: \X) • Standard stalls must have a minimum length of 15 and a minimum width of 9 feet ~ 4 inches; and • Compact stalls must have a minimum length of 12 feet and a minimum width of 7 feet 6 inches. Compact parking spaces are not allowed to exceed 50% of the total parking provided for structured parking areas. In addition, the applicant needs to provide a minimum aisie width of 24 feet between the parking spaces (RMC 4-4-0BO.F.9). . Sensitive Areas: Based on the City's Critical Areas Maps, the subject site contains steep slopes, landslide hazards, an erosion hazard, a seismic hazard, and a Class II stream. In addition it appears that a portion of the Panther Creek Wetlands may e~end onto the subject s~. . The seismic hazard is related to potential liquefaction of soils during an earthquake event. The steep slopes, landslide hazard, and erosion hazard are related to soil stability. A geotechnical analysis for the site Is required. The analysis needs to assess soil conditions and detail construction measures to assure building stability. Prt:C7-033 (CO Vaney View Office).doc , : • • A stream and a wetland report shall be submitted at the time of formal land use application and shall delineate onslte streams and wetlands as well as streams arid wetland located within 100 feet of the subject site. The report shall classify the wetland andlor stream and should establish the required buffers. In addition a mitigation plan shall be submitted with the formal land use application if any impacts to wetlands or streams or their associated buffers are proposed. Environmental Review: The proposed project would be subject to Environmental (SEPA) Review as the proposal would result in the construction of more than 4,000 square feet of office area and more than 20 associated parking stalls and is not Categorically Exempt per WAC 197-11-800. Permit Requirements: The proposal would require Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval, and Environmental (SEPA) Review. All permits would be reviewed in an estimated timeframe of 10 to 12 weeks. The application fee for joint land use applications is full price for the most expensive permit (Site Plan at $2,000) and half off any subsequent permits: 112 of full fee for a SEPA Review (Environmental Checklist) which Is dependent on project value: less than $100,000 Is $200 (112 of $400 full fee) and project value over $100,000 is a $500 fee (112 of $1 ,000 full fee). In addltionto.therequired land use permits, separate construction, building and Sign permits .would be required. The review of these permits may occur concurrently with the review of .the .Iand ,usepermits,but cannot be issued prior to the completion of any appeal periods. llmpactMitigation Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction fees, the following mitigation fees would be required prior to the issuance of building permits. + A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per new dally trip attributed to the development; + A Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per new commercial construction. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees In attached for your review. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The Commercial Corridor (eC) district is characterized by concentrated, pre-existing commercial activity, primarily in a linear urban form, that provides necessary goods and services for daily living, accessible to near-by neighborhoods, serving a sub-regional market and accommodating large volumes of traffic. Land Use Element Objective LU-EEE: Create opportunities for development and re-development of land in portions of the Commercial Corridor deSignation for general business and service uses. These include a wide range of restaurant, small-scale to big-box retail, offices, auto dealers, light industrial, and residential uses. Objective LU·GGG: Guide redevelopment of land In the Commercial Corridor designation with Commercial Arterial zoning, from the existing strip commercial urban forms into more ' concentrated forms, in which structures and parking evolve from the existing suburban form, to more efficient urban configurations with cohesive site planning. ;. . Policy LU·347. Implement development standards that encourage lively, attractive, medium to high-density commercial areas. . Policy LU·349. Support development plans Incorporating the following features: 1. Shared access pints and fewer curb cuts; 2. Internal circulation among adjacent parcels; Prr07'()13 (CO Valley View Offu:e).doc • • 3. Shared parking facilities; 4. Allowance for future transition to structured parking facilities; 5. Centralized signage; 6. Unified development concepts; and 7. Landscaping and streetscape that softens visual impacts. Policy LU-353. Structures at Commercial Corridor intersections should not be set back from . the street and sidewalk so as to allow vehicular circulation or parking to be located between the sidewalk and the building. Policy LU-358. Parking areas should be landscaped (including street trees, buffers, berms), especially along roadways, to reduce visual impacts. Community Design . Objective CD-G: Architecture should be distinctive and contribute to the community aesthetic. ·PolicyCD-40. ~Structuresshould be designed (e.g. building height, orientation, materials, color and bulk) to 'mitigate potential adverse Impacts, such as glare or shadows on adjacent less intense land uses and transportation corridors. Policy CD-41. ,Rooftops that can be seen from public streets, parks, or open space should be designed to hide mechanical equipment and to Incorporate high-quallty roofing materials. Objective CD-I: New commercial buildings should be architecturally compatible with their surroundings in terms of their bulk and scale, exterior materials, and color when existing development is consistent with the adopted land use vision and Purpose Statemeriis for each Commercial Centers Designation in the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element, Center, .and Commercial Policies. PolicyCD-44. Development should provide appropriate landscaping and fa~de treatment when located along deSignated City arterials or adjacent to less intense developments in order to mitigate potentially adverse visual or other impacts. Policy CD-50, Trees should be planted along residential streets; in parking lots requiring landscaping, and in other pervious areas as the opportunity arises. Trees should be retained whenever possible and maintained using Best Management Practices as appropriate for each type. Policy CD-51. Landscaping is encouraged, and may be required, in parking areas to improve their appearance and to increase drainage control. cc: Jennifer Henning PrdJ7.{)33 (CO Valley View Officej,doc , . CA ~'ZON1NG . 0 :'UCIDIICAL IBaV1CB8 R-l 77th Ave. SE 13 • 31 ruN RSB E liZ o 8n toO ,-H3 30 T23N RSE E . '. TO: FROM: DATE: • Jill Ding Janlllian May 9, 2007 • CITY OF RENTON MEMO UTILITY PLAN REVIEW' SUBJECT: PREAPPLICATON REVIEW COMMENTS VALLEY VIEW PROFESSIONAL OFFICE PREAPP NO. 07-033 4XXX-S. 37" Street NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN TInS REPORT: .The following comuientson . development and permitting 'Issues:.are based on the pre-application submittals made to the 'Cltyof ,Renton by the applicant.' '-The ,applicant Is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g. Hearing Examiner, Boards of Adjustmeut, Board of Publle Works and ,CltyCouncll). Review comments :may·also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City 01' inaM by the a pllcant. . . WATER 1.' Water .system Development Charges ate based on a rate ofSO.273 times .the:gross square foot of the site. This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. 2. There is an existing 12-inch water main in S. 38 th Street. This main extends through the site to the south where it connects to an existing 12-inch located on the hospital site .. Available derated frre flow in the area is approximately 4,000 gpm. Pressure available is approximately 112 psi. A pressure-reducing valve will be required to be installed on the domestic water meter. 3. Preliminary ftre flow requirement is 2,250 gpm. 4. All new construction must have fire hydrants capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 gpm. One primary hydrant is required within ISO feet from the building and two additional hydrants will be required be within 300 feet of the building. 5. There are fire hydrants in the vicinity that may be counted towards the fuc protection of this project, but are subject to veriftcation for being within the required distance. 6. Existing hydrants counted, as ftre protection will be required to be retrofttted with a quick disconnect Storz fttting if not already in place. 7. A water main extension will be required on site. Additional hydrants will also be required. 8. Ifftre flow exceeds 2,500 gpm, a looped water main around the building will be required. tJ'D (..0 or 9. The proposed project is located in the 350 water pressure zone and is outside an Aquifer Protection Zone. Valley View Professional M.y 9. 2007 Page 2 of3 • 10. A Reduced Pressure Backflow Assembly (RPBA) will be required to be installed at the domestic water meter to the building. II. A Fire sprinkler system will be required by the fire department. A separate no-fee utility permit and separate. plans. will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly for fire sprinkler line. All devices installed shall be per the latest Department of Health "Approved List" of Backflow Prevention Devices. Location of device shall be shown on the civil' plims and shall show note: "Separate plans and utility permit for DDCV A instaUation for Fire Sprinkler System will be required". DDCVA installations outside the building shall be in accordance with the City of Renton Standards. For DDCV A installations proposed to be installed inside the building, applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing the location and installation of the backflow assembly inside the mechanical room. Installation shall be in accordance with the City of Renton's requirements. DDCV A shall be installed immediately after the pipe has passed through the building floor slab. Installation of devices shall be in the horizontal position onIv. 12. Landscape irrigation systems will require a separate meter and backflow device. A ,plumbing permit will be required SANITAiRYSEWER " . ,'\,. I. . "S~wer System Developllll:nt Charges 8re.\>ased.on a rate.'Of$O.l42 times the grosssquare:foot of the site. This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. 2. There is an IS-inch Metro sewer· transmission line located along the north property line that runs east and west along S. 37 th Street. Applicant will mostly likely be tying into this main. A frontage ree will be required to be paid for connection to Metro's sewer. . " 3. If finished floor elevations are below:25 feet, a ''tideflex:' or similar backflow device will be required to be installed. Show device on the civil plans 4. If food preparation facilities (kitchen, restaurant) are proposed, a grease trap or grease interceptor will be required. A separate plumbing permit is required. 5. Parking garages will require floor drains by the building department and shall be connected to the sanitary sewer system. Flows shall be directed through floor drains that are installed in accordance with the Uniform Plumbing Code to an interior or exterior oil/water separator. The separator shall be sized to meet a minimum IS-minute retention time for peak flows anticipated in the garage area, but in no case will be less than 200 gallons of storage capacity. The type of interceptor shall be as manufactured by Pipe Inc., Utility Vault Inc., or approved equal. The oil/water separator shall be shown on the civil drawings. SURFACE WATER I. There are existing storm drainage facilities in S. 370, Street and in S. 38 th Street. 3. A storm drainage plan and drainage report will be required. Due to downstream flooding and erosion problems, staifis recommending a SEPA condition requiring this project to comply with the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual to meet both detention (Conservation Flow control -a.k.a. Level 2) and water quality improvements. Valley View Professional May 9,2007 Page 3 ofJ • • 4. Separate structural plans will be required to be submitted for review and approval under a .building permit for proposed underground vaults for water quality andlor detention, Special inspection from the building department will be required. S. Erosion control shall comply with Department of Ecology's 2001 Storrnwater Management Manual TRANSPORTATION/STREET I. A traffic mitigation fee of $75 per additional generated daily trip shall be assessed as determined by the ITE lrip generation manual. 2. A traffic analysis has been submitted. Analysis shall provide information relating to ingress and egress from the site off of S. 3S lh Street, traffic flow and impacts to the intersection at this entrance. 3. No vehicle access to the site will be allowed from S.37d' Street. Applicant shall comply with conditions set forth in a letter dated February 21, 2007 from Neil Watts, Development Services Director. Improvements in S. 37" will no be required however a fence shall be constructed along the north end of the site and secondary emergency access from S.J7"will be ,gated. 4. All wire utilities shall be installed undergrounli per the City of Renton Under Grounding, Ordinance. If three or .more poles are required, to be moved by the development .design, ,all. existing overhead utilities shall be placed unde~grqund. " .:.,:>.;,. GENERAL COMMENTS ': . . ,' J. All construction utility pernrits for utilities, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton.Drafting Standards, Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer, 2. When the utility plans are complete, please submit three (3) copies of the drawings, two (2) copies of the drainage report, permit application and an itemized cost of construction estimate and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check, it is recommended to call 425430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. 3. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is S% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half the fee must be paid upon application. 4. Any proposed rockeries or retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height will be require a separate building permit and will require special inspection. S. Separate permits and fees for water meters, side sewers, and backflow devices are required. cc, Kayren Kittrick ,I •• DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: : i FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM May2,2007 Jill Ding, Senior Planner _ I if) James Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal ~ Valley View Professional Office, 400 Blk S 37th St Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 2250 GPM, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and two additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. 2. A fire mitigation fee of$13,832.00 is required based on $.52 per square foot of the building square footage, minus the parking structure. 3. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of sprinkler and fire alarm systems. 4. Fire department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20 feet in width with a turning radius of 45 feet outside and 25 feet inside. 5. A site plan for Pre-Fire planning is required to be submitted for your project. This shall be submitted prior to occupancy, in one of the attached formats. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. i:\valleyviewprof.doc ~. '. ", ... • '. ' , I PRE-FIRE PLANNING I RENTON FIRE DEPARTMENT In an effort to streamline our pre-fire process, we are requesting that you submit as'ite plan of' your construction project in one of the following formats which we can then convert to VISIO.vsd. This is required to be submitted prior to occupancy. ABC Flowcharter.a.t:3 ABC Flowcharter.af2 Adobe illustrator File.ai AutoCad Drawing.dwg AutoCad Drawing.dgn Computer Graphics Metafile.cgm Corel Clipart Format.cmx Corel DRAW! Drawing File Format.edr Corel Flow.cf] Encapsulated PostscripJ File.eps Enhanced Metafile.emf IGES Drawing File Format.igs Graphics Interchange Format.gif Macintosh PICT Format.pct MicrogratX Designer Ver 3.I.drw Micrografx Designer Vcr 6.0.dsf Microstation Drawing.dgn Portable Network Graphics Format.pnf Postscript File.p.s Tag Image File Format.tif Text.txt Text.csv VISIO.vsd Windows Bitmap.bmp Windows Bitmap.dib Windows Metafile.wmf Zsoft PC Paintbrush Bitmap.pcx (j) Rick Charbonneau From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: • Rick Charbonneau [rickc@orbarchitects.com] Tuesday, August 07, 2007 8:20 AM 'Jill Ding' Geoff Anderson (geoffa@orbarchitects.com) RE: Valley View Professional Development Thank you -we will not submit the memo sent yesterday. Regards, Rick Charbonneau ORB Architects 607 SW Grady Way, Suite 210 Renton, WA 98057 (t) 425.226.3522 (f) 425.226.9115 -----Original Message----- From: Jill Ding [mailto:JDing@ci.renton.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 8:10 AM To: Rick Charbonneau Subject: Re: Valley view Professional Development Mr. Charbonneau, • DEVELOPMENT CITY OF RE~~NlNG AUG 1.32007 RECEIVED There appears to be a conflict between our crical areas regulations and landscape regulations. Since our critical areas regulations do not permit landscaping within the critical area or buffer the critical areas regulations trump the landscape requirements without the need for a variance to the landscape regulations. Jill K. Ding Senior Planner City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 jding@ci.renton.wa.uB Ph: (425) 430-7219 Fx: (425) 430-7300 >>> "Rick Charbonneau" <rickc@orbarchitects.com> 08/06/2007 11:08 AM »> Jill, The Valley view Professional Development site plan submittal (pre-application #07-033) is just about ready for review. One issue that Laureen Nicolay pointed out last week when we met with her is regarding landscaping the property along Talbot Road. Please see attached memo regading existing conditions and request for variance. Does this request get submitted (12 copies) along with the balance of the site plan submittal or does it stand alone? (or is it required at all?) . Please let us know how to proceed on this matter. Regards, Rick Charbonneau o.r.b architects 1 "",... . ,",. • F~bruary 21, 2007 . , " Mr. Cliff Williams •• , ',CITY OF RENTON ' '" Planning/BuildiriglPublic Works Department ' Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator , DEVaOPMENT PlANNING ",', CITY OF RENTON, ' , ' , ,P:O: Btlx 24tH " '. : ,. AUG 1.3' 2007 ,RECEIVED " " Kirldand, W A 98083 ," SUbject: Reconsideration Request for WiUver of Street hDprovemeilts Springbrook Office Park ' " • Dear Mr, Williams: We have received your appeal request for our earlier decision to deny the ;"'ai~er of street improvements ',' , of South 37'" street for the above listed project. Based oil the iIiformation provided in the appeal, we also considered informatibn as a request for admiilistrative reconsideration oflhe originaladnrinistrative ' ' decision. After revieWing the inforffiation provided iIi this'latest request, we have determiiledthatthe' waiver can be approved, subjecl!o conditi~ns. " , 'The propo~ed development is for Lot 4 of the Renion East Valley Medical Pilrk Short Plat, approved and ' , recorded in 1978. As part bf the short platapproval, the property owner wasgiveri the option of using 'South 37'" Street for access t6 Lot 4, including providing new street improvements, or creating a new, internal roaHor access to Lot4. ,The' property oWner elected to create a new internal road, and the short ,plat was iecoriled'and developed upon that basis;" ' " ·The Prop6~edd~velo~ment slie, Lot 4, while abultingSouth37'" Street, has 86cess fr~mTaIboi Ave ,',,' 'South. While Talbot Ave South is an arterial ,street, Souih37'" Street Isa low volume residential street providing access to a single familyneighliorhood. The proposed develbpmentcifLot 4 would only have access from South 37'" Street ror secondary emergency access. It would not 'have direct access from' ' , South 37'" StreeHor nonruil vehiculai' use, or for pedestrian connection, ' 'The proposed waiver of street improvements for South 37"' Street is approved, subject to the condition ' that any developmentofLot 4 wonld be !inritedto secondary emergency access from Sciuth 37'" Street. ' The frontage along South 37'" St will need to bdenced, arid the secondary emergency access be gated, These provisions will further discOltrage the use oribe abutting ,residenti'al street for parking related to the' " new develop~nt.,' " .. , ... , If you have imy questio~~or need additional iiJ.fo~tiori; please cci~tact Mike Dotson, EQgineering , Specialist; at (425)430,73(j4. " , : .., ., . . .. ... ' Si71;;r vJitf > Neil :Waits, Diredor ' , " " Deveiopme~i Services Division ' . , ... ·~c: ilie~g.Zimm=an; Planni~gtB~ildi~glPublic Works AdministratOr Mike DQtson, Engineering Specialist ,,', Jill Ding, Senior Planner' ' ",\,~:~::·.;'-(":·i':<T~,,;')';T:-\ ' ',FEB ,22 2007 ',\ '\ " ' " ' I LQ·i: __ ~...:....:.-===c=~ ~-~~~-l-OS-'S""'S-OU-th~Grad'--, --'y-w-a~Y-"-Ren-' -to'-n,-w-"-hln-'-gt-o-n-9-S0-S-S---'--'---' RE N' TON, LDr. AHEAD rip'· T.HE ,CORV~ . --_.------------------------------------------- -------------- • DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION. WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS rhis requirement may be waived by: I. Property Services Section . ) Public Works Plan Review Section l. Building Section k Development Planning Section PROJECT NAM E: ---,U"-,~-.u.:1 ::=;;;\-....;Ij~l.."~,.,,l '''-) --,O'""'-!.f.L.D"-,, c:c=>e~. DATE: _.>=6J'-l-'-~-"'-I-'O=-]...L-. ___ _ .DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION. WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS lreless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory bf Existing Sites 2 AND 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 Map of View Area 2AND3 Photosimulations 2 AND 3 is requirement may be waivEid by: Property Services Section Public Works Plan Review Section Building Section Development Planning Section P ROJ ECT NAME: _,",\J,-,a.""c!..lI!-=~'F\---'(Yvb,-,-'e"",! ... ,),----,,O~f,-,rL.!t)??'-"-_ DATE: _5'-4-/J..::{O'-'-/..:::.O]-'--_____ _ • • Exemption for Undeveloped Critical Area(s) and Undeveloped Major Easement(s): When . . calculating the area to be charged the system development charge, undeveloped critical areas (per RMC 4-11-030) and undeveloped major easements within the property shall not be included in the square footage for the calculation of the charge. It is the responsibility of the property owner or applicant to submit a study determining and classifying the critical area. The property owner or applicant shall submit a legal description of any easement(s) or critical area(s) so that these portions of the property can be exempted from the development charge(s). The intent of this exemption is to not charge property that is undevelopable. If the property is used or can be used to satisfy any condition 6fthe development such as parking or landscaping, it shall be considered developed and does not meet the qualifications of this exemption. • Q·r·b architects July 16th, 2007 City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, W A 98055 Attn: Jill K. Ding Subject: Project Narrative for • Valley View Professional Office Development pLANNING oE"~~~~~ENTON A\lG \.3 LOO? RECE\'JEO Lot 4 of the Renton East Valley Medical Park Short Plat (parcel 3023059111) Dear Ms. Ding, -. ~'-'Theattached Site PI~Re~ew;pack~g;a~s~iibesaiir~osedtw()~story Commercial Office "building containing 21,920 net 'square Teet of Office. and MedicallDental space. The building gross square footage is 26,600 with a :13,300 square foot parking garage below. The property is an irregular-shaped lot that is located North ofthe Valley Medical Center and South of South 37 th Street, with South 38 th Court and Talbot Road to the East. The site zoning is Commercial Office (CO) with Residential zoning (R-l & R-8) existing to the West & North. A Neighborhood Detail Map is attached. Building: The building will be constructed to provide 50% Office space and 50% MedicallDental space. A structured parking garage will be provided below the first floor level to supplement surface parking. Building height will be limited to two-stories for compliance with an existing neighborhood covenant. Per the International Building Code (IBC), the Office and outpatient type MedicallDental spaces will be classified as a Group B occupancy. The parking garage will be classified as a Group U, enclosed parking garage. Building construction will be Type V at the Group B occupancy areas and Type I or II at the Group U occupancy area as allowed by the IBC. Fire sprinklers will be provided to protect all portions of the building and parking garage. Site Development: , The site is approximately 5.46 acres currently undeveloped. The proposed development covers approximately 1.47 acres at the Northeast portion of the site. The area to be developed consists of mostly tall grasses; a small group of trees near the Northwest corner of the developed area will be removed for re-grading. South of the developed area the site is heavily wooded with primarily deciduous trees. The Southern tree line will remain, with tree removal occurring only as necessary. Of the 1.47 acres developed, the building footprint covers approx 13,300 square feet, paving covers approx 31,438 square feet and landscaping covers approx 19,166 square feet. The remaining 3.99 acres will be undisturbed. . ORB 2707 Page 1 • • Streams & Wetlands: The development area is restricted at the South and West sides by a 100-foot Class II stream buffer along Panther Creek. Within this stream buffer, wetlands have also been identified. The stream and wetland buffer lines are shown on the site development plans. There will be no ground disturbance in the stream buffer area during construction of this project. A Wetland/Stream study has been prepared by Alder NW. A copy of this report is attached for your reference. Slopes & Soils: The area to be developed slopes down from East to West at grades ranging from 8% to 23%. The developed area will be terraced with retaining walls to provide paving slopes in the parking lot not to exceed 8%. Retaining walls are proposed to be constructed of segmental masonry type blocks with an engineered geogrid soil reinforcing installed behind. Retaining wall heights will vary from I-foot high to an approximate 14-foot maximum. Guardrails and Barriers will be provided along the top of retaining walls for pedestrian and vehicle protection. The parking.garage floor level is set approximately. at the existing grade elevation at the West side of .the. building. ,The;.garage:structureiscut back.into .the.natural grade Jine .that.rises to.the East. South of the:area to 'ibe.developed ,the grades are:steeper , sloping down from North ,to South, with slopes ranging 'from 30%·to 44% down into to the Panther Creek stream/wetland area. A'soilsreport'has been:prepared for this site by,GEO Group:Northwest, Inc. It should be noted that the report was'based on;an.earlier site layout concept. A copy of this report is attached for your reference. Estimated Ouantities and type of materials involved if any fill or excavation is proposed: Fill material used to achieve design site elevations below the building area and below non- structurally supported slabs, parking lots, sidewalks, driveways and patios should have the following specifications: Be free draining, granular material containing no more than five (5) percent fines (silt and clay- size particles passing the No. 200 mesh sieve) Be free of organic material and other deleterious substances. Have a maximum size of three (3) inches in diameter The suitable on-site soils are to be used as structural fill, it will be necessary to segregate the topsoil and any other organic or debris containing soil. Excavated on-site material that is stockpiled for later use as structural fill is moisture sensitive and will be protected from rainfall or contamination with unsuitable materials by covering it with plastic sheeting until it is used. Structural fill should be placed in accordance with the soils report recommendations The proposed site will have a net export of soil and will be hauled to an approved disposal site as determined by the contractor. Approximate cut is 5,440 c.y. and the fill is 2,660 c.y. with the net export of2,780 c.y. Proposed Off-site Improvements: We are requesting the South 3ih Street Waiver of Street Improvements approved for the previous concept be allowed for this proposal. A copy of the Request for Waiver approval is attached for' your reference. ORB 2707 Page 2 • • Traffic & Parking: . Vehicle and pedestrian access to the site will be located off the West end of South 38th Court with a 24 foot wide two-way drive centered on the street end. The existing sidewalk will be extended into the site. A secondary 24 foot wide emergency access point with gate is proposed to be located off of South 37th Street. . The concept is consistent with that proposed on the earlier site layout, including a provision for the property line along South 37 th being fenced to discourage visitor parking on the residential street. A 5-foot high ornamental iron fence is proposed along South 37th Street. We have attached a copy of the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for this project by Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering. It should be noted that this report was also based on the earlier site layout concept. With the building net square footage and uses being essentially the same as the previous concept, the total parking count and estimated trip generation remains basically the same as described for the previous concept. The total parking count described in the traffic analysis actually decreased by 12 stalls based on the following calculation. Parking will be provided at the rate of 3 stalls for each 1,000 net square feet of Office area (10,960 sf! 333.3 = 33 stalls) and:1 stall:for.each 200 net square feet of MedicallDental area (10,960 sf/200 =55 stalls). Alotal of88:stlillsiwill be provided with.34.ofthoseibeing.located in the.parking . ... ..~ ... garage. At the surface;Iot:25.st"alls will be designated;as··~compaCt" .. -:___ . _ .. _ Site Utilities: Site water distribution will'be provided off of South 37th • An on-site fire hydrant will be provided to supplement the two existing hydrants in the vicinity. All of the fire hydrants are within the required distance of the building .. Storm drainage will include an on-site detention vault with downstream bioswale for water quality treatment according to 2005 DOE Manual. .The storm detention will be designed according to the 2005 KC Surface Water Design Manual, Level 2 control requirements. Sanitary sewer will be provided from the building, connecting to the existing Metro sewer manhole located at the intersection of South 37th Street and South Shattuck Ave. An Oil/Water separator will be provided at the outfall from the parking garage floor drain system. Power and data services will be provided underground per the City of Renton under grounding ordinance. Landscaping: The landscape concept includes parking area plantings with irrigation as required by the Renton Municipal Code, with additional trees, shrubs and grasses planted along the property / fence line to blend nature with architectural forms. ORB 2707 Page 3 • • Refuse & Recycle: A trash and recycle dumpster enclosure will be provided centrally located on the main access drive. The enclosure will be screened consistent with the quality of the primary building per the Renton Municipal Code requirements. Total estimated construction cost: Site development costs (not including land cost) Building core & shell costs Total Construction Cost Estimated fair market value: Including land cost Please do not hesitate to let me know if you have any further questions. Sincerely, i.~··· GeoffE. Anderson, AIA Principal ORB Architects ORB 2707 ---f $1,130,000.00 $3.700.000.00 $4,830,000.00 $6,305,000.00 Page 4 " • Construction Mitigation Description: • Proposed construction dates Begin Date: October.!, 2007 End Date: March 29, 2008 • Hours and days of operation • DEVELOPMENT cny OF RE~~N/NG AUGt.32oo7 RECEIVED Construction will be performed between the hours of 7:00 AM and 5:00 PM Monday through Friday. At this time we do not anticipate any weekend or overtime work but we do reserve the right to perform with prior acceptance from the City of Renton and in cooperation with the surrounding neighborhood. • Proposed Hauling and transportation Routes Anymajor hauling and. deliveries to and from site will travel the following path (see map below also). Leave site via South 38" Ct. and proceed to Talbot Road South. Turn right on Talbot and proceed to South 43'" Street. Turn right on South 43'" Street to Highway 167. Proceed on Highway 167 either north or south. (At this time, it has not been determined if any" and how much expon may be required for this project. Due to this, we have not determined an exact location of any transport) oE===?,.wm . ' me It 02OO?N",VTEO • • • Measure to be implemented to minimize dust, traffic and transportation impacts, erosion, mud, noise, and other noxious characteristics We will be implementing all measures required for the minimization of impacts stated above. Dust will be controlled by employing a water truck as required throughout the duration of the project. Traffic and transportation will be maintained with the employment of flag person and other control measures as required. At this time, we believe that the parking of construction personnel will be on-site. There will be a designed erosion control plan that will be constructed to maintain and meet all requirements for environmental impacts. This will be constructed prior to the start of the excavation of the project. In regards to noise, we will work with the surrounding neighbors to control the noise so not to impact them. Any loud noise activities will be confined to the required work hours. • Any special hours proposed for construction or hauling (i.e. weekends, late nights) At this time, we do not foresee any project activities that will require any weekend or late night .work. We do reserve the right to perform during these hours with the appropriate approvals. .• ·Preliminarytraffic.control plan During the project we will employ a detailed traffic control plan that will incorporate the use of signage, flaggers, fencing and other required means to secure the safety of others. Prior to construction we will develop a detailed traffic control plan and present it to the City of Renton. For general traffic patterns, please see the map we have included above. -------------------------- • • :) W :J b Z 0 N ~ '1-UJ ....J « Z c i~ ~ - '<:( -0 () al-, :1:- - Q~ I- 0::: N ~c Z W W W ~ U, 0 ~ -LL -Cf) 0 LL W U 0 NT PlANNING DEV~1W'~~ RENTON . AUGt,32007 RECEIVED' . . . -,.," .. (\ r ) .:.. t , "'@@ . ( . 11.. EA Mr. Cliff Williams . Springbrook: Office Park, LLC. P. O. Box 2401 KirIdaod, Wasbington 98083·2401 Subject: W~S1ream Study SpriDgBrook Office Center Property Rantca, Waslringtoo .Kiog-County Pan:el#30230S91 H . . Dear Mr.Wi1Iiams: • AlderNW February 27, 2007 Project No. 122006 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING erN OF RENTON AUG 1.3 2007 RECE'VED As requested, we bavecond'leteda Wetland/StreamStudy forthc property identified as.Kiug County Pan:e1 1# 30230S9JlJ.Thcpropertyjs >lOcated 1111 tho south side of South 371h 'Street at Shattuck Avenue South, with an Cxteusion of the property ,ccle •• ting 1lIISt to Talbot Road, in 1he City of Renton. The purpose of our Wmk was to ideati1Y the limits of wetland areas, aud streams, 1111 and immediately acljaceat to the subject property. In conduetins our site wetland evaluation, we followed the genera1 procedures for the routine on-site methodology as outJined in the WQShington State Wetlanda Identification and Delineation MD1fUQ1 (March 1997). This procccIure involves analysis of Vegeqnon patterns. soil conditions, and ~ hydrology in malriua a determination of wetland conditions. We Idso identified the north bank of the stream wbere it crosses tbe property. The bank was identified based on cbaracteriStics ideDtifying the limits of surfiJce water 1IIOVeJIIt.III.wi1hin a defined channel. Field wotk to c:omplete the site evaluation and to iclcDti1Y and mark the limits Of the wetland areas on tbe subject properties was completed 011 December 21, 2006. Weldso revisited the site 011 FebruaJy 23, 2007 to review site conditions. . WETLAND EVALUATION PROCEDURES For the purpose of this study, we used the wetland definition adopted by the Enviromnenta1 P.otection Agency (EPA) and the Army Corps of~ (COB) for administering Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Acconlins to this definition, wetlands are: "Those areas !bat are inundated or ssturated by surfiJce water or groundwater at a frequency imd duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevaleoce of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands gcneralJY.include . swamps, m8nbes, bogs, and similar areas."· (33 CPR 323) \ ; :~":»~' ;;S;.··c:;::.~D\ R ... ". 2007 .. , MA" <, . . .:~ ' .. ". j' "1-::'.':.... _, ____ -;;;:~-~ ;... ... : ... -==-..;;::.:.-~ 518 North 59th Street, Seattle, Washlngtori' 98103-Phone (206)783-1036 email aldernw4/lcomcast.net Mr. Clift'W'illiams . Fcbrumy 27, 2007 • • In WasbiDgrm . State, 1hc ShonlIiDe MaDagemcnt Act and Growth Man ......... Act have amended this definition to . exclude somo WetIaDiIsituatioos by addins 1hc rOuowins sentcnrcs to 1hc wetJand de1iDiticm: wcitIauds do not iDcIude those artificial wetJands jntentjonally creatod from DOII-wetlaDd sites, . includilIg but DOt Jimited to, irriptioD 8IId draiDage ditdIes, srass-lincd swales; CBII8IB, detention fiIcilities, wastewater treaImeIIt fiIciIities,fiIrm ponds, I11III I8!VIscape amenities, or those wetJands . Cleated after July I, 1990, that \IWlnl intmtionally creatod III a result of the COIIStn1etion of a roId. street or Highway. Wetlands may iDcIude those artificial wet1aDds iutmtionally creatod from non- wet1and an.l88 to mitipte 1hc coaversioa of wetJands. Delinealion proc:eduIes are based on. diagnostic enviroDmenca1 indicators of wetland vegetation, wetIaud soils, and wetlaDd hydrology. 'Ibe8e proc=luJes, outlined in the Washington State Wetkmda Itknttj/Ctltton and Delineatton Manual (March 1997) are commonly !mown 88 a Triple PalameteJ Method. By definition, an area is designated as wetland when there are positive indic:alOrll for all tine p8I'IIlIIetCI'B. . .AIisting_qfp.~spcciesJII!S ~.~!JPClljI:J(U80in 1hIl.methodoI!ISY fordeljQearingwetlaDd _ .. This listing .. assians plant species to ODe of five indiCator·status caIepies.1tIII8iDs fromObIipte wet1and species, which aJmost always ocau in wetlands, to Upland species,'which rareIy.occurin wetJands. UDder JIOIIII8l conditions, hydrophytic ~esclBliCII is deUluniDed to be prescot if_ thao.50peR:ellt of the cIomiDant spcciesare in the Obligate (OBL), FacultativeWetland (FACW), or Facultative (FAC) indicator categories. Diagnaetic ~ of hydric soils are tdated tosOilsaturatioo, which leads to lIIIIIIltObic conditioos in the soil. Under these conditions, decomposition of organic material is inlubited and soil minerals ani reduced. mating cbaracterisIic soil c:olors that can be quanIified by comparisoo with MunseI1 Soil Color Charts. A cbroma of ODe or less in IIIIIJIOItled soils or a chroma of two or less in mott1ed soils geomaIly indicates a hydric: soil. In addition, soils that an,sattirated durina the irowma season satislYa critctiCII for.hydric soils. Wo used a baud auger aDd or sbovel to collect soil samples from depths of 8 to 18 inches, or beJowthe A horizon. Wetland hydrology is dcfiucd as iDimcfated or saturatal soil conditions .for at 1east 14 ~ days duriDg the . growing season. If no water is prescot at the time of evaluation. other indicatms may include topographic low points or chamds,iIood debris, compleJo absenoe ofvegellllioll. or p!escllce ofhydric: soils. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS The subject property is an irregularly shaped partelof approximately 5.6 IICmI lcxatcd on the scMh side of South 31" Street at Shattuck Avenue SE in the City of Rcuton. The location of the property is illustrated on the attacbIld Vicinity Map (Figure I). AI present 1hc property is lllldeveloped. Adjacem properties to the north; aloll8 South 37'" Street are occupiod by existing sing1e fiunily rosidences. There are existing office buildings to the south and there is an office structwe 011 the scMh side of South 37'" Street adjacent to the east property line. Tho property to thO wesI is lllldeveloped and is occupilid by forest. Toposraphieally, 1hc property iDcIudes a moderately sloping section on the nortbeasJ comer Of the property where ekMltions ranse from about elev. 86 at the nortbeasJ corner a10ns South 31" Street to about elev. 60 near the middle of the property a10ns south 37'" Street. The property slopes Slceply down to the west and scMh from this sligbtly sloping section of the property. The southern section of the property starling at the base of the SIcep slope is Projec:t No. 122006 Page No. 2 ---- Mr. cwrWllliams FeImJ8Iy 27.2007 • • relatively flat with a slight s10pe down from east to west from about eIev. 56 at the east to about elcv. 32 at the west property line. Panthor Creck flows across this sediemofthe property. Soils em the property and in the surrounding areas north south and east of the Ploperty are mapped as AIdeJ wocxl grave/ly sandy loam (Sol/ Survey of King COllIIt)'. WashJngton, U.S. Soil Coascrvation Service, 1973). AJderwood soils are described as a modemteIy well drained soil funned WIder conifers in glacial deposits. It bas a relatively impellneable COIISOIidimxlsubStnmim at depths of 24 to. 40 inches below the SUI&:e. This soil type is DOt included on the National Technical Committee on Hydric Soils listing of hydric soils, ahbough wetIaud conditions are often fouJId in sbaIlow deprossions within AIderwood soil 1IIIits. Our observaticms of soil CClIIditicms across most of the property are generally consistent with the A1derwood soil type. Seattle muck·· soil type is mapped aIoog the west Side of the .plopei ty. The Seattle Muek map IIIIit gcaeralJy conesponds with a wetIimd area extending north from the property along the east side of State RDute 167. Our obsemIticms indicate that the Seattle Muck soiIlIIIit extends part way onto the southwest comer ofthc property. Vr.getation on the property includes foUrgeneralbabitatsas iIIustiated 011 the Site Map (Figunr2). -These includc an - area of !JllCD msalforbs em the. reIativc1y ilatDOJ1beast comer of the property;. an area of unIpnd scmlHhrub 011 the . northwest comer of the property, .upl".., deci d!!fI!!3tmst on the more steeply sloping sedion of.theploperty and in a sma1Icr lIIIitjust west of the open graas/1bJbhabitat,and fumttn! wrt'mvI 011 tho south section of tho site. Predominant species present within the open grassIfmb habitat include ra:d c:anarygtasS(Pha1artsarrmdtnocea). and cieeping buttercup. Himalayan blackberry (Rubus disc%r) and some Sc:oCB broom, is becomiDg establisbed in patches across this area. Vegelation within the upland scrub-shrub habitat area is dominated by Himalayan blru:kbeny. There is 1ittIe other vegetation present within the dense blackberry. Blaclc c:ottoowood (popu/us balsamifera) iIIId rod a1der (Alnus robra) are thepredominaut tree species preseut 011 the upland forest habjrat with some bigleat' maple (Acer macraphyllum) also pIIlSCIIt. There are western rod cedar (Thuja pltcata)pIIlSCIIt 011 the panhandle section BIljaceot to Talbot Road. Himalayan blackberry is the pnxlomiJlaot shrub UIIdentory species present. . Blaclc c:ottoowood is the predontiuant tree species present within the forested wetIaud babitat area. salmonberry (Rubus spectabi/Is) aIoog with BOIJIC Himalayan blaclcberry are the predominant sluub species. Reed IlIIIIIIlY grass is preseut in more open sectiOJlS of the area. WetlllJld Areg We have identified two wetland areas on the property as shown on the Site Map (Figure 2). These include Wetland A which extends across the south section of the property. This wetland is piut of a larger wetland extending off the property to the west and north along the east side of Highway 167. We also identified Wetland B. a small isolated wetland of less than 600sq.ft. part way down the slope above the western end ofWetland A. It is our interpretation that the larger Wetland A meets the c:riteria for designation as a City of ReDton CategoJy 2 wetland and the smaller WetIaDd B meets the criteria for designation as a City of Renton Category 3 Wetland.· The City of Renton wetland categorization (Renton Municipal Code M-I) c:riteria are listed below: Project No. ·122006 . . Page No. 3 ------------------------- Mr. Clifl'WIlliams Fcbruazy 27, 2007 • • "L ClassificatiOD System: The following classificatiOD system is hereby adopted for the purposes of P'qIJ1lating wet1ands in the City. WetlaDds buffer widths, repI • ."........ ratios I11III IM>idJma: criteria sha1l be based 011 the . fuJlowing ratiug system: , ' i. Cateaory 1: CategoJy 1 wetlands an: wetlands which meet 0IIIl or more of the following criteria: (a) The presence of species listed by Federal or State govemment as eoclansmd or t1neatacd, or the , presence of essential babitat for tboso spcclei; aIIdIor (b) Wetlands having furty percent (40%) to sixty percent (60";.,) permaaeot open water (in dispersed patches or otbcrwisc) with two (2) or more vqytation classes; and/or (c) Wetlands equal to or greater tInm ten (10) am:s in size I11III having three (3) or more vegetaUOII classes, 0IIIl of which is open water; and/or " (d) The presence of plant '~atiOllS of infrequeat occurrence; or at the geographic limits of their occurrence; aIIdIor ~ ~ate&C!ry .2: ~ l \I\'etIIIIIds are wetlands which meet OIIeormore of the following criteria: (a) Wet1aDds that an: DOt Category lor3 wetlands; and/or (b) Wetlands that have heroD rookeriGs or osprey nests,hut'arc DOt 'Category l'wetIaads; lIIIdIor (0) Wetlands of aD)' size 1ocatc:d at the beadwaten of a watercourse, i.e., a wet1aDd wi1h a JlCiieoDial , or seaSOll8J outflow mannel , hut wi1h no defined infIueDtmaimeJ,hut arenotCatcgoryI wetlands; and/or ' (d) Wetlands baviug minimum existing evidenCe ofbumaa-related physical a1teration such as diking. .1 ...... :-_ .......... _,. • ...... , u&--...ue or qpp]IQ!Z8tjon; auwor iii. Category 3: Category 3 wet1aDds an: wet1aDds wliich meet OJIC or more of the followiug criteria: (a) Wetlands that are sevcreIy cIistutbed. Severelydisturbcd wetIIIIIIIs an:wctIaDds which meet the following criteria: ' (1) Are characJeri.7AlI by hydrologic isolatiOll, humaD-reIated hydrologic a1teratioDs such as diking. , ditching, chanooIizatim and/or outlet modificatiOll; aad (2) Have soils altcratiOllS such as the pre IIU of fiII, soil nlDIO\Ial aIIdIor CODlp8IlIiOII of soils; aad (3) May have altered vegetatiOll. (b)WetIands thai are newly eDIelging. Newly ClllCigWg wet1aDds are: (I) Wetlands occurring 011 top of tiD materials; and (2) CbaraoIerized by emergent vegetation, low plant species ridmess aad used minimally by WihDife. 'These wetlands are generally fuund in the areas such as the Green River Valley I11III Black River Drainage Basin. (c) AD other wetlands not classified as Category J or 2 such as smaller, high quality wetlands." Prqject No; 122006 ' Page No. 4 Mr. cwrwUUams FcbruaIy 27. 2007 • • . Wetland A occupies au area of approximately 53.000sq.ft on the soutlmest secUon.ofthe property. UsiDg the U.S. fish and Wildlife Service wetIaud clessificatioJl system (Cowatdin et aI, 1979). the wetlaud an the ptoperty includes two wetland habitat classes; PalusIriDe deciduous forest and pa1ustriDe scrulHhrub. The majority of the wdIand on tho property is furested, with black IlCIItoImood as the predominant ttee species, with some red alder prennt Scrub shrub habitat is present along tho south side of the wetland where. it is DIOI\l open. ShIub species preseIIt include hardback spirea (Spl1'tleQ doug/as/f). salmon\Ieny, wiIlciwiJ (Salix spp.), 8Ild Himalayan blackberry. RcCd caruuygrass is present as berbaeeous groundc:over over much of the wetland. Off..site to the north there is a section ofpaJustrine emergent wetIaDd habitat. Hydrologically, the wetland is supported by overflow from·Pamher CI\lek which flows through the wetIaud. Then: is aIJo some near surfiIce seopaae into the wetIaud from ac!iaCClllt side slopes. It is our iDteJpn:tation that the wetland DieetB the criteria furdm.gnptjon as aeity ofReotm Can:gory 2 Wetland. It docs JIGt meat the criteria 'asa Category. I Wetland hora ... then! an,. DO-spccics1isledas'1bJ"'b .liCdlll':cmdaugen;il· _.-. . presept Wi1hin the wetIaod, the wetland docs nOt include aR8S of open water .aDd then! am DO .plant· species .or associations of infrequent OCCwi_ in 1110 Puget SouDd 11l8ioD. It docs DOt meat the crltaia fordrSignation as a Category 3 wetland beQuse it is not a sma1I isolated wetland and it has not been subject to signific:aut disturbanI:c. It meets the criteria fur deSignation as a Category 2 wetIaud becauae it does not meet the criteria as Ii Category I or 3 wetland. The standard buffer fur a category 2 wetland in the City of Renton is 50ft. We!!pndB Wetland B is a verysma1I isolated wetland with an area of apploxiinately 563sq.ft. UsiDg the U.S. fish and Wildlife Service wetland classifiaition system (CowaJdin et ai, 1979), the wetland includes two wetland habitat classes. The CCDtral portion of the area is pa/ustrine ett.eJgeot habitat with m:d canary grass and soft rush (Jtmcus effiuua) as the WiidilOD species. There is' scrub-shrubhabitat around the margin of tho area wbere HimaIayaa blackberry is the predominant species. Hydro1ogiailly, the area is supported by near surfiu:e seep88e. It appears that then! bad been some grading on the slope 8Ild in the area of this wetland which may have created an area where seepage IUlCUiIiUIares to create the wetland. It is our interplt,tation that this smalI wetland meets the criteria fur designation as a City of Renton Category 3 wetland beQuse it is quite smalI and has evideni:e of past di~ affecting vegetation and hydrologic pattcmS within the area. The standard buffer fur a Category 3 wetland is 25 feet. The wetland is located within the designated stream buffer. There is a small area where application of the 25ft buffer extends outside of the stream buffer. As a Category 3 wetland of less than 2,OOOsq.ft it is exempt from regulatiOn as outIinIld in Section C.H of Renton Municipal Code. Givan its position within tho designated stream buffer, the . wetland itself wouId be prcte<:ted, but under the exemption, the 25ft buffer should not be applicable. . Project No; 122006 Page No. 5 Mr. Cli1fWIIIiams Februaly 27, 2007 Panther Creek Stmpm StwiY • • Panther Creek flows across 1he south side of the property. The creek enrers the piopelty from a c:u1vert tbroush the road embankmeat for Talbot Road. It flows westerly across the pmpctty within a well dc6nc:d dlaimcl for a disIance . of applOximately4SOft. At this point the clwmeI makes a nearly right II11gIe tum to the south befun: again tumiDg to the west aud through the wetland bofon: Ieavius the property ncar the toe of the skipc at the west propcrtr line. The main dlannel across the property has a width of 4ft to 6ft during 1he wiDter season. At the time of our visit in Dcoombcr, 2006, there was a amaIler stream t:bannel which ftowedWllSt from the point where the.main c:lVllmel makes the right II11gIe tum .. There was surface water within a defiJJed gravel channel. We marlced the nortbcm limits of this channel. The bank was detennined althe basis of the cxteDl of surface water within the dc6nc:d channcI or in some Iocatiaos where there was a defined gravd bed outside of the width of surfiIcc water. At 1he timO of a secood visit 011 February 23, 2007, there was DC surface water within this smalIer channel. Panther Creek originates aithe outlet. from Panther Lake, approximately I. 7 miles sou1heast of the subject piOperty. It ceotinucsDOrth &omtheprcpertywithin a ditl:blinealoDsthe ilaBtsideofHigbway·161I11111theocbains1Dthewest and into Springbrook Creek. Panther Creek is jdmtjfied as a Category 2 Stream On Figunl4-3..QSQQ4inclnckdin .the Renton Muuicipal Cede. The staodard Ilufm-for categOly 2 streams is 100ft. Application of the 100ft stream Ilufm-includes Wetland A BDd . the SOft wetland buffer. It also iccIudcs Wetland B I11III most of its 25ft buffer. We trust the information presented is sufficient for your current needs. If you have any questions or require addi1iooal information, please call. Sincerely yours, . '~:r:pJ))tu~J . ~P.~ , __ v_.~ Project SeieI1tist Encl.: Figure 1 Figure 2 ViciDity Map Site Map Projeel No. 122006 PsgcNo.6 .. .---------------------------------------- , , : -" .. -1· I~ 1:'" . ~ "i ':i Ii " i , .,-, ii".· ;\ , .i: • . ~" ... ,-,-." .. . ~--.. ,." " .... '" .. ~ .•. v"'" ' •• ~._ ¥,,"_._. i ····1· .. ;'''''' / .r~ . -. -, • '._,-~'r'-"'-":' .... '':- f. Kent·,· ALDERNW • .-.. ~··_i VlCINllY MAP Springbrook Office Park Renton. Washington Project No.122006 Dote Feb., 2007 Figure 1 ~{j;~?,~:#t·':4~:~t " -~. APPROXIMATE SCALE 80 o 80 160 feet -------------- forested Wetlond ~\dUOUS Forest A derNW SITE MAP Springbrook Office Park Renton, Washington Proj. No. 122006 I Date Feb., 2007 I Figure 2 + .N' ~ --------------------- • • DEVELOPMENT SERVICES' DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an.EIS is required. INSTR~CTioNS;FOFfARPLICANis:":'::::'~~-•. O!.;:':c'_:;;;=~-~:~~~£¥'~~~::t~~::.~:-L'-· ~. . . This environmental checklist 'asks you to describe some .basic '.information about your ·proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether ·the 'environmental impacts of ·your proposal are significant, requiring 'preparation of an EIS. Answer ·the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not.apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions 'now may.avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON PROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for non project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON PROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For non project actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," ~'proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. Y:\Projects\2707 Valley View Professional Development\Oesign Research~EPA.doc07/19/07 -, -." '.:.. # r------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ • A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed projeci, if applicable: Valley View Professional Office Development 2. Name of applicant: ORB Architects 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Geoff E. Anderson, AlA Principal G07 5W Grady Way, 5U1te 210 Renton, WA 98055 _ .425.22G.3522,phone :425.22G;91 J 5 fax 4. Date checklist prepared: 07.11.2007 5. Agency requesting checklist: '", .• :,..;.-._""-~ .• "t City of Renton Development 5ervlces DIVIsion 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): • . -. ~. -~ --~----~----' .. -- -:--::--. -" ; -- Construction Will begin approx In October 2007 and end approx In April 2008 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NO 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Wetland/Stream study has been prepared by Alder NW. A SOils Report has been prepared for this site by GEO Group Northwest. Inc. TraffiC Impact AnalySIS prepared for this project by Mlral Transportation Planning" Engineering. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. NO Y:\Projects\2707 Valley View Professional Development\Design Research\SEPA.doc 2 --, -.~- '.' ----------------------------- • • 10. List.any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. NONE 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. Proposed IS two-story Commercial Office Budding containing 21,920 net square feet of Office and MedlcaVDental space. The bUtldlng .gross square footage IS 2G,GOO with a 13,300 square foot parking garage below. The building will be constructed to prOVide' 50% Office space and 50% MedlcaVDental space. BUilding Height will be limited to two-stories for compliance With an eXisting neighborhood covenant. The site IS approximately 5.G2 acres currently undeveloped. The proposed development covers approximately 1.5 acres at the Northeast portion of the site. Of the 1.5 acres developed, the building footprint covers approx 13,300 -,square feet, pavlngcoversapprox 24,500 :square feet -and ,landscaping ,covers"· ___ '"""0 :approx .27, 500 square feet. The remaining 4.'1 .·acres will :beundlsturbed ;--':" 'C~ ': 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for ,a person to .understand the 'precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, :and section, township, .and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, 'provide the-range or:boundaries of the site(s). Provide a' legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The property IS located on the 50uth side of 50uth 37th 5treet at 5hattuck Avenue 50uth, With an extension of the property extending East to Talbot Road, In the City of Renton. 5ectlon I Township I Range -5E 30 23 5 Legal DeSCription - 302305 I I I LOT 4 CITYOF RENTON EA5T VALLEY MEDICAL PARK 5P REC AF # 7808151009 5D 5f' DAF-POR 5E V4 BEG AT 5 V4 COR TH N ALG C/L OF 5D 5EC 250FT TH N 89-0G-03 E 950 FT TO TROB TH N PLT N-5 C/l OF 5D 5EC 421.49 FT TO WLY PROD OF 5LY LN OF TR REC AF #4G87718 TH 584- 17-00 E ALG 5LY BDRY 5D TR 4' 5LY BDRY TR REC AF #4G4392G 813.94 FT TO WLY LN CO RD TH 5 OG-002-W ALG WLY LN CO RD 520.0 I FT TO N LN TR REC AF #4G9G849 TH ALG NLY LN 5D TR N 74-39-53 W G74.52 FT TO ANGLE PT TH 5 89-0G-03 W I 05 FT TO TP05 Y:\Projects\2707 Valley View Professional Devetopment\Oesign Research\SEPA.doc 3 ." • • B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); fiat, rolling. hillv. steep slopes, mountainous, ~~ . b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) The area to be developed slopes down from East to West at grades ranging from 8% to 23% The developed area will be terraced with retaining walls to prOVide paving slopes In the parking lot not to exceed 8%, South of the area to be developed the grades are steeper. sloping . down ·from North to South. With slopes ranging from 30% to 44% down Into to the Panther Creek stream/wetland area, ,.,. __ . .:._.-';'.,._" __ ," ___ •.• __ ",,,':,. ~ ..... :;:-~ .. ~ •. -=-::'~.O!::::...::"_."",:-' , "c. What 'general types of soils are found on the site (for example, 'clay, 'sand,' gravel, :peat,~';"",:-_";'","-:'c: muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The soli type per the Geotechnical Engineering Study prepared 'By Geo Group Northwest. Inc, dated DecemberG. 200G indicates loose Silty sand overlYing dense to very dense sandy slit SOIl. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. City of Renton Critical Area Maps indicates that the subject site contains steep slopes. landslide hazards and an erosion hazard. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. All fill material used to achieve deSign site elevations below the building area and below non-structurally supported slabs. parking lots. Sidewalks. driveways and patios should have the follOWing speCifications: I, Be free draining. granular material containing no more than five (5) percent fines (slit and clay-Size particles passing the No. 200 mesh sieve) 2. Be free of organic material and other deleteriOus substances 3. Have a maximum size of three (3) Inches In diameter If the on-site solis are to be used as structural fill. It will be nece55ary to segregate the top5011 and any other organic or debrl5 containing 5011. because 5uch 50115 would be unSUitable for use a5 structural fill. Excavated on-site material that 15 stockpiled for later use as 5tructural fill 5hould be protected from rainfall or contamination With un5ultable materials by covering It With plastiC sheeting until It 15 used, Structural fill should be placed In thin horizontal lifts not exceeding ten Inches In loose thickness, Y:\Projects\2707 Valley View Professional Development\Design Research\sEPA.doc 4 • Approxllnate Cut = 5,440 Cubic Yards Approximate Fill = 2,GGO Cubic Yards • The eXisting soli will be cut back Into the natural grade to set the parking garage entry (West end) at approximate elevation of eXisting grades. The East end of the garage will be fully below grade. The sUitable cut material WIll. be used to fill areas behind retaining walls. Excess cut material will be disposed of off site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing. construction. or use? If so, generally describe. Proposed development presents a low risk of erOSion which can be mitigated through the proper use of the erosion control measures. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? •. About ,.I8;G% .. of the site .wlli be covered With Impervious surfaces. -..,..,......~ •. -. '" h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 2. AIR There Will be a deSigned erosion control plan that Will be constructed to maintain all requirements for environmental Impacts. Filter fabriC fences should be Installed downhill from all disturbed soli areas. Plastic sheeting, Jute netting or other methods that are approved by the City of Renton should be Installed on disturbed SOil areas. Permanent erosion control such as pavement and landscaping Will be Installed to prevent any eroSion. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. POSSible dust and exhaust from construction equipment, but will not Significantly Increase air emissions b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: '(:\Projects\2707 Valley View Professional Development\Design Research\SEPA.doc 5 ------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- 3. WATER • • Con5tructlon pha5e dU5t control will be a5 required by the City of Renton a. Sutface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The development area 15 re5trlcted at the 50uth and We5t 51de5 by a IOO-foot cla55 II 5tream buffer along Panther Creek. Within this 5tream buffer. wetland5 have al50 been Identified, The 5tream and wetland buffer Iine5 are 5hown on the 51te development plan :2) ·WiII.theproject require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described -" '.' ."".="""'''''"':~waters?-If:yes, .please describe,and .attachavaiJable plans .. _ , ----...-.. -..... .. --"'-~~-"~.=1"""=.~-""-::_:""-~-'-""'-"? __ ' ~ There will ·:be 'no ground dl5turbance In the 5tream buffer area during ;con5tructlon of thl5 proJect. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NONE 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NO a. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. NO 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NONE Y:\Projects\2707 Valley View Professional Development\Design Research\SEPA.doc 6 - ------------------------ -------------- ------------------------- • • b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn. or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description. purpose. and approximate quantities if known. Ground water 5eepage wa5 ob5erved In one of the te5t plt5 at a depth of I 8 mche5 below ground 5urface. Ground water will be collected around the buildmg with footmg dram5. Collected groundwater will be conveyed to lower area5 of the 51te and re-mfiltrated mto the ground. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable). or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. NONE c. Water Runoff (including storm water): '. ".".. ..',.., .... =-_"",1L~ .. -",~"Describe. ,the ,source._-of ,runoff ",including ;storm .water) _and method of .collection and --.;:;~-.' _,disposal.,i/any (include quantities, .if·known). -Where-·will this water flow? Will this water- ---··flow-into·otherwaters;-If-so;-describe:------.. --. -. --.. ---. -_ ..... _ ....... -........ . 'Ram Water 15 the 50urce Catch ba5m5, yard dram5 and roof dram5 will collect the 5urface runoff and plpe5 will convey the runoff to the water quality and detention facilltle5 on the 5lte. Once treated and detamed, flow control 5tructure5 will relea5e the 5torm water mto an on 51te level 5preader. The 5torm Dramage facilltie5 for the 51te will be de51gned ba5ed on the Kmg County 5tormwater Management Manual. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. NO d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The 5urface water collection 5y5tem Will collect the runoff from the pollutant generatmg Impervlou5 5urface5 and route the 5tormwater to the on 51te water quality treatment 5y5tem. The runoff from the balance of the 51te Will combme With treated 5trormwater down5tream of the treatment 5y5tem and be re-mtroduced onto the 51te by a level 5preader. Con5tructlon pha5e er0510n control Will be a5 required by the City of Renton. Y;\Projects\2707 Valley View Professional Oevelopment\Oesign Research\SEPA.doc • 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _x deciduous tree: alder. maple. aspen, other __ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other x shrubs _x grass __ pasture __ crop or grain • _x wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _x water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The area to be developed consists of mostly tall grasses; a small group of trees near the Northwest corner of the developed .area Will be 'removed for re-gradmg . ~o·~,C.;:-.. : ';lL:isrthreatened,or·endangered·species'known-to:be·on.or'near the.site. . .~~.. . . . NONE d. 'Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The Landscape concept mcludes parkmg area plantm'3s which will ad color and unity to the proJect, with IrrI'3atlon as required by the Renton MUnicipal Code. with additional evergreen trees planted along the North property/ fence line to create esthetically and environmentally pleasmg transition from the architecture to nature and from nature to the architecture. Lar'3e Maple Tree at the east Side of the property Will be saved and preserved. Other areas of landscaping Will contain trees. shrubs and '3rasses as appropriate to blend mto and compliment the remamm'3 undisturbed areas. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other _______ _ Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other .,-_______ _ Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other _____ _ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain NO Y:\Projects\2707 Valley View Professional Development\Oesign Research\SEPAdoc 8 -------- • • d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: The small group of trees being removed will be replaced with new trees. , 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe. whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Energy utilization will be electric and natural gas for heating and appliances. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NO c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this ;proposal? Listother;proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: __ "":':_":"'~._.:_"':-._~ ._>::~~. "': ... :7!?-::=;'~_-~_' __ '_-::""L _ ':"':'-";:''':::~. !..~...;~.: • _--:...-'. ..:.0.----::: . _:''' _"'~~':'.: ~- ,-.' . , ---;Energy !efflc)ent "lighting ,andll1'1pr,oved~buddln.g .envelope",R-Values :.;:;";'--'" . ,I nsta lIatlon-of=the=--sun=screens=over glazlng-;::.-cuse,-=of'-Insulated-glass-~and installation of operable windows would prOVide savings' Include-both up- front HVAC. system cost reduction and .annual energy cost savings. Over 10 years savings can be substantial ,and saving Will continue for the life of the budding. Other conSiderations may Include lighting control automation. Compliance With 2004 Washington State Energy Code as amended by the City of Renton. 7. ENVIRONMENTALHEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. NONE 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. NONE 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A Y:\Projects\2707 Valley View Professional Development\Design' Research\SEPA.doc . 9 .- • • b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? T raffle nOise 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term: Construction will temporarily mcrease nOl5e level5 m the area. NOl5e from the con5tructlon of thl5 project will not occur durmg the hour5 of 8:00 PM and 7 :00 AM m conformance with the requlrement5 of Renton MUnicipal Code and WAC 173-GO for perml551ble nOl5e level5. It 15 anticipated that the con5tructlon will be limited to 7:30 AM to 5:00 PM. Monday Through Friday. ""' .Long ,term":~, C,'_, ~,~o~, _'''''''. ~c<-.,-,y"c="" '~'~'C .-=:~'"'", '20 -. --... ----.. ~-.-.'-" .,._----.-. ~ '.'''' ~..., ~7' .,.-.,._ -."'----=".;,......""r·_-~·...,..,...~"'"" .. ·,..,.......,...."..;_~·, .. --. __ ._-.- '"7, •• -' -'=", .~.....,~-......,.-... ." ••• _., • .;"',.... .. ..,.-. .' .. _--._-." - Tr.afflc.oNoI5e-generated.cby-'the"pmject":15.cnot-antlclpated-to-contT'lbute----- 51gnlflcantly to eXI5tmg-noI5eleveI5"m'.the :area.-·" 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control 'noise'impacts, if:any: Short term: The contractor 5hall verify that equipment muffler5 and nOl5e 5hrouds are mtact and functional. ,EqUipment that IS not m use will be turned off. Long Term: TraffiC nOise generated by the project IS not anticipated to contribute significantly to eXlstmg nOise levels m the area. The site entry IS limited to access from the commercial zoned area, traffiC nOise Will not be mcreased on the adjacent residential street. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Current site IS undeveloped at thiS moment. The site zonmg IS Commercial Offlce(CO) With Residential zonmg (R-I * R- 8) eXlstmg to the North Y:\Projects\2707 Valley View Professional Development\Oesign Research\SEPA.doc 10 ---l '. I • • b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. NO c. Describe any structures on the site. NONE d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? N/A e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Commercial Office (CO) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? . ·Not .Available ... . ~_._~", _~""~'4_ . __ .... __ .•. _-. . -. ~,.,...,.......".,~ .. =;--,,,..,-.,"",.-;r.-~ ..... -,,..., ... ~-'t""'"""""...--.~ .. ~ .. ...--" - ... ".. _. --_.... "I::" -• ," .. -------g,--If·applicable,-what·is·the.current·shoreline·master-program·designation·of.the·site?·-'.' . e. . _-_._ ... _-_._--_._ .... --. --_ ....... -. _ ... __ .--_ .... -.-.. -.. ----- N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. The development area IS restricted at the South and West Side By a I OO-foot Class II Stream Buffer along the Panther Creek. Within this stream buffer, wetlands have also been Identified. The .stream and wetland buffer lines are shown on the site development plan. There will be no ground disturbance In the stream buffer area dUring construction of this proJect. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? ApprOXimately GO people would work In the completed proJect. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? NONE k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Proposed development IS compatible with eXisting and prOjected land uses. Y:\Projects~707 Valley View Professional Development\Oesign Research\SEPA.doc 11 • • 9. HOUSING. a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. ., . , .1._. ._. _. ~ :... . ....z.;--..:;' •.. , ";.~_ ......... .:!-~-"'.:._--:=.~:.:;: .. ':" ,:'!'-~'::~! ... :-' __ . ~~_._,,":,._~~,-- Building Height will be limited to two5tOrle5 (25 foot 'puildlng 'height) for' -compllance.wlth-an-exI5tlng-nelghborhood-covenant frlnclpal-BUlldlng-material-15-pre=ca5t-concrete-panel5 b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: BUilding ae5thetlc5. will be environmentally friendly and developed In conjunction with community need5. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Nighttime exterior 51te lighting will be Included with the project development. Flxture5 to be full cut-off type to reduce light pOllution Impact5 on neighboring propertle5 b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? NO c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? NONE Y:\Projects\2707 Valley View Professional Development\Design Research\sEPA.doc 12 • .---<--.~ • . ~ .... -'-:-:::::"~:.-~ ...... _------------------------- • • d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Fixtures to be full cut-off type to reduce light pollution Impacts on neighboring properties. General design approach for exterior lighting to comply with recommendations indicated In IESNA RP-33-99. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? NONE b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Installation ,0La .blke rack 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. NONE b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Vehicle and pedestrian access to the site will be located off the West end of the South 38th Court with a 24 foot wide two-way drive centered on the street end. The eXisting sidewalk will be extended Into the site. A secondary 24 foot emergency access pOint With gate IS proposed to be located off of South 37th Street. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The nearest transit stop IS on the corner of Talbot Road and South 37th Street Y:\Projects\2707 Valley View Profes.sional Development\Oesign Research\SEPA.doc 13 ----------------------'---------- "' .... " • • . c. Hpw many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Parking will be provided at the rate of three stalls for each I ,000 net square feet of Office area (I O,9GO sf / 333.3 = 33 stalls) and I stall for each 200 net square feet of Medical/Dental area (I O,9GO sf / 200 = 55 stalls) A total of 88 stalls will be provided with 34 of those being located In the parking garage. At the surface lot 25 stalls will be designated as • compact". d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? . Access to the site will be located off the West end of 50uth 38th Court With a 24 foot wide two-way drive centered on the street end. The eXisting sidewalk will be extended Into the site. A secondary 24 foot wide emergency access pOint With gate IS proposed to be located off of 50uth 37th 5treet. ~:rhe .property line along.50uth 37th IS being fenced. to discourage vIsitor. ~-.. , .. ;parklng on the residential street. A 5-foot high ornamental Iron fence IS proposed at this area. ---------We-are-reqoestlni3-the--5outh-37th-5treet-Walver-of-5treet-lmprovements·----- approved for the prevIous concept to be allowed for this proposal. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. NO f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Based on a traffiC study performed by Mlral Associates (using a larger medical space allocation), a total of G I 9 vehicle tripS per day would be generated by the completed project. G I new tripS are expected during AM peak hours, 145 new trips are expected during the PM peak hours. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 5ecure bicycle parking IS prOVided at the parking garage level and showers are prOVided for those employees wanting to bike to work. The City of Renton requires payment of a transportation mitigation fee prior to the Issuance of bUilding permits, The transportation mitigation fee to be contributed IS calculated based on $75 per each new project -generated average dally trip (ADT) , Therefore, the total calculated transportation mitigation fee for the project IS $4G,425 ($75/tnp x G I 9 net new ADT's) Y:\Projects\2707 Valley View Professional Development\Design Research\SEPA.doc 14 • • ,15. PUBLIC SERVICES a, Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. NO b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity. natural gas, water. refuse service, telephone, sanitarv sewer, septic system, other. ,b. .Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be ___ ,,'_ :.'_'~' >-_,,' -. .""", __ ' ... "needed.c_2"'""::._::'·',,,, -, , ..", -.. -~ Ga5, On-5lte drainage --------------------- C.SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non"significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosur Proponent: Name Printed: Date: rl Y:\Projeds\2707 Valley View Pr.ofessional Development\Design Research\SEPA.doc 15 ~-- -------~------------------------------ • • D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2.: . ·-;Howwould:the proposalbe likely to affect plants, ·animals, fish,-or marine life? :Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such. as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Y:\Projects\2707 Valley View Professional Development\Design Research\SEPA.doc 16 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • • 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist'should:there:be any willful misrepresentation or , . ..,:,willful.lack of full disclosure on.my,part'--'"~o,,~·'" ~~~-"~.-:' "'.-." _~'~_.' " _~ . , . .-........ -----.. ~ :Proponent: Name Printed: Date: ENVCHLST.DOC REVISED 8/98 • • •• 4. •• •• __ ~_ ~' __ "_ ~ _~ "-:."'!~4~-=:-::~~""':';:' :.",;~_,. '.'"-,, < -:-'r-___ ._...".-. Y:\Projects\2707 Valley View Professional Development\Design Research\SEPA.doc 17 '-.,'" • GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED MEDICAL/OFFICE CENTER 400 BLOCK SOUTH 37m STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON 'G-20S2 . Prepared for Mr. Cliff Williams Springbrook Office Park, LLC P.O. Box 2401 Kirkland, WA 98083-2401 December 6, 2006 GEO GROUP NORTHWEST,INC. 13240 NE 20 th Street, SUite 10 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Phone: (425) 649-8757 Email: info@geogroupnw.com DEVELOPMENT CITY OF RErn.tt~NING AUG 1 32007 RECEIVED . , , • Group Northwest, Inc. December 6, 2006 Mr, Cliff Williams , Springbrook Office Park, LLC P,O, Box 2401 Kirkland, WA 98083-2401 SUBJECT: GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED MEDICAL/OFFICE CENTER 400 BLOCK SOUTH 37m STREEt 'RENTON,WASHINGTON , ' , Dear Mr. Williams: • Geotechnical Engineers, Geologists , & Environmental Scientists 0·2052 Per your request, OEO Group Northwest, Inc. completed an investigation of subsurface soils at the subject site and prepared the following report which summarizes our conclusions and recommendations regarding the proposed ~evelopment OEO Group Northwest, .Inc., explored subsurface soil conditions at the site by excavating five exploratory test pits TP-I through TP-5 on June 2, 2005, ·The test pits were excavated to depths between 3 and 7 feet below ground surface (bgs) by a backhoe, Soils encountered at the test pits consisted of loose silty SAND to sandy SILT soils overlying medium dense to dense sandy SILT soils at depths ranging from 6-inches to 2.5 feet below ground surface . . Based upon .the results of our study, it is our professional opinion that the site is geotechnically suitable for the proposed development The proposed buildings can be supported on conventional spread footings bearing on the dense site soils or on compacted structural fill placed on top of the dense native soils The site soils may be used as structural fill provided they can be compacted to meet the compaction specifications. Because the site soils are fine-grained they are considered to be moisture sensitive and will be difficult or impossible to compact during wet weather conditions. If earthwork is planned for the winter months we recommend that a relatively free-draining pit- run sand or gravel be imported to the site for use as structural fill. Please refer to the text of the . report for more specific recommendations regarding the site development 13240 NE 20th Street, Suite 10 • Bellevue, Washington 98005 . Phone 425/649-8767 '. FAX 425/649-8768 , , • December 6, 2006 400 Block South 37th St., Renton, Washington • 0-2052 Page ii We appreciate this opportunity to have been of service to you on this project. We look forward to working with you as this project progresses. Should you have any que.stions regarding this report or need additional consultation, please feel free to call us . . Sincerely, OEO Oroup Northwest, Inc. i)~~ William Chang,P .E. Principal GEO Group Northwest, Inc. ~: ,::.. • , , • TABLE OF CONTENTS JOB NO. G-2052 • Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................... 1 1.1 Project Description. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1 1.2 Scope of Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1 2.0 SITE CONDITIONS .................................................... 1 . . 2.1 Site Description. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1 2.2 Geologic Overview ............................................... 2 2.3 Field Investigation '. . . . . . . . . . . .. . ... . .... . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2 2.4 Soil Conditions .......................... ;.;; ............................ ., ..... ; .... ~ ............ 3 2.5 Groundwater·Conditions .............. ; ... : .................................................. '. '3 .' 3.0 SEISMICITY ..... , .................................. , .......................................... 3 .3.1 Seismic Hazards .................. : ............................................... 3 3.2 Seismic Design Classification .. . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3 4.0 SLOPE AND EROSION HAZARDS ...........••.•...••••••..••••••••...•. 4 4.1 Steep Slopes ............................ ' ................ '.' . . . . . . .. 4 4.2 Landslide Hazard Areas . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4 4.3 Erosion Hazard Areas ... ;......................................... 5 4.4 Hazards Risk Statement·.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. 6 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS •..•..........•..••.••.•.•... 6 5.1 General ............................ , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6 5.2 Site Preparation and General Earthwork ............................... 7 5.2.1 Temporary Excavation and Slopes .............................. 7 5.2.2 Structural Fill ............................................... 8 5.2.3 Site Work During Wet Weather ................................. 9 . 5.2.4Subgrade Stabilization ........................................ 9 5.2.5 Soil"Cement Stabilization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 10 5.3 Spread Footing Foundations .................................. : .... 10 5.4 Permanent Basement and Conventional Retaining Walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 12 5.5 Slab-on-Grade Floors ............................................ 13 5.6 Drainage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 14 5.6.1 Surface Drainage ........................................... 14 5:6.2 Footing Drains ............................................ .14 GEO Group Northwest, Inc. .1 ,------------------------------------ , , , • TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) • 6.0, LIMITATIONS ...................................................... 14 7.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES .....•..•.....•..............•...•.......... 15 ILLUSTRATIONS Plate I Plate 2 Plate 3 'Plate 4 APPENDIX A: Vicinity Map Site Plan Proposed Site Plan Typical Basement Wall Backfill and Drainage Detail TEST ,PIT LOGS 'GEO Group Northwest, Inc. ---l .--------------------------------------~-----'------------,---;---- , " • • GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED MEDICAL/OFFICE CENTER 400 BLOCK SOUTH 37TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON 0-2052 1.0 ,INTRODUCTION 1.1 'Project Description The project site is located at the 400 block of south' 37th Street in Renton, Washington as shown on Plate 1 -Vicinity Map. The subject parcelislocated on the southern side of South.3? :Street, in Renton, Washington, directly across 'from address 404 South 37th ,Street. We understand. that the subject lot has an area of approximately 5.7 acres and has an irregular shape as shown on the attached Plate 2 -Site Plan. The proposed site development will consist of constructing two wood-frame buildings with associated parking lots. The eastern building is proposed to consist of a two story medical office building with daylight basement parking garage. The western building is proposed to be a one- story office building with daylight basement parking garage. The basement garages will have concrete retaining walls. Parking lots' are proposed for the low to moderate inclination slopes located in the northeastern-most portion of the subject parcel. A schematic of the proposed deyelopmenthas been included with this report as Plate 3 -Proposed Site Plan. 2.0 SITE CONDITIONS 2.1 Site Description The site is currently undeveloped and shows no obvious signs of previous grading activity. The northern portion of the project site, where the development is proposed, consists oflow to moderate inclination slopes which face west. These slopes have inclinations ranging from 8 to 23 percent from the horizontal with an average inclination of approximately II percent. . Just to the south of this area is an area of moderate to steep inclination slopes which faces primarily south. These slopes have inclinations ranging from 30 to 44 percent from the horizontal and have a height ranging from 20 to 32 feet. At the base of the moderate to steep slopes lies a GEO Group Northwest, Inc. -----~----------------------------~---- , . • • December 6, 2006 400 Block South 37th St., Renton; Washington relatively flat area and the stream channel for Panther Creek, which flows west across the property. The existing topography is shown on the attached Plate 2 -Site Plan. - G-2052 -Page 2 The gentle to moderate angle slopes located on the northern side of the parcel are vegetated by grasses, blackberry bushes and some deciduous trees. The moderate to steep inclination slopes located on the southern portion of the property are vegetated primarily by ferns, small bushes, deciduous trees and a few evergreen trees. The South 38 th Court roadway dead ends at the northern property line. At the time of our site investigation on June 2, 2005, it was apparent that some yard waste and soil may have been dumped onto the subject property at the South 38 th Court dead-end. 2.2 Geologic Overview According to the geologic map of the site vicinity', the surficial soils at the project site are reported to be Ground Moraine Deposits more commonly known as glacial till (Qgt). Glacial Till is described as a hard, unsorted mixture of sand, silt, and gravel deposited during the _ Pleistocene Fraser Glaciation period about 14,000 years ago. The till soils were overridden by glaciers and typically are dense to very dense below the weathered zone. Based upon the map, Renton Formation (Tr) bedrock may be located on the western-most portion of the site. The Renton Formation consists of Arkosic sandstone, mudstone, shale, and several coal beds. The rock in this formation is said to be irregularly cemented by calcium carbonate and have a -thickness of about 2,500 feet. 2.3 Field Investigation GEO Group Northwest, Inc., explored subsurface soil conditions at the site by excavating and logging six exploratory test pits TP-I through TP-5 on June 2, 2005. The test pits were located in areas roughly surrounding the proposed building areas as shown on Plate 2 -Site Plan and Plate 3 -Proposed Site Plan. The test pits were excavated to depths ranging between 3 and 7 feet below ground surface (bgs). Soil samples at varying depths were collected, classified and returned to our laboratory. The test , "Geologic Map of the Renton Quadrangle, King County, Washington", D.R. Mullineaux, U.S.G.S., 1965. GEO Group Northwest, Inc. :' \ . " • • , , ' : ' ·;~~·;'1·~·:~ ,';, ,',: December 6,.2006 400 Block South 37'" St., Renton, Washington 0-2052 Page 3 pits were then backfilled with the excavated site soils and tamped into place by the backhoe bucket. 2.4 Soil Conditions Soils encountered at the test pits consisted of loose silty SAND to sandy SILT soils overlying medium dense to dense sandy SILT soils at depths ranging from 6-inches to 2.5 feet below ground surface. Some sedimentary rocks were encountered within the dense sandy SILT soils at . , the test pit TP-3-and TP-4 locations. The majority of soils encountered appeared to be the glacial till soils discussed in the geologic literature for the site. The observed sedimentary rocks are indicative of the sedimentary Renton Formation which probably underlies the glacial till soils.at the site. Copies of the Test Pit Logs are presented in Appendix A: Test Pit Logs. 2.5 Groundwater Conditions· Groundwater seepage was observed at a depth of 18-inches below ground surface at the TP-5 test pit location. It should be noted that groundwater conditions may fluctuate seasonally, depending on rainfall, surface runoff and other factors. 3.0 SEISMICITY 3.1 Seismic Hazards We.understand that the City of Renton has classified the project site as having a seismic hazard due to potential liquefaction of soils during an earthquake event. Based upon the soils encountered in our subsurface investigation, it is the opinion of GBO Group Northwest, Inc., that there project site soils are not potentially liquefiable. 3.2 Seismic Design Site Classification According to the 2003 International Building Code (IBC), the project site has Site Class,C soil (Very dense soil and soft rock), as derived from Table 1615.1.1 in the IBe, based upon the subsurface soil conditions found during our site investigation. GEO Group Northwest, Inc. ", .. \,~, .• "" .1 .,' , • December 6, 2006 . 400 Block South 3']'1' St., Renton, Washington 4.0 SLOPE AND EROSION HAZARDS • G-2052 Page 4 We understand that the City of Renton Critical Area Maps indic'ate that the subject site contains steep slopes, landslide hazards and an erosion hazard. 4.1 Steep Slopes The City of Renton classifies steep slopes into two categories: Sensitive Slope and Protected Slope. Sensitive slopes are those slopes having an average slope of 25 to less than 40 percent and those slopes with average. inclinations of 40 percent or greater having a maximum vertical rise ofless than 15 feet. Protected slopes are defined as those slopes with an average slope inclination of 40 percent or greater. and having a minimum vertical rise of IS feet. Based upon the City of Renton slope defmitions, the majority of south facing moderate to steep inclination slopes at the site may be classified as Sensitive Slope areas. A small portion of the south facing slope; near the eastern property boundary may be classified as Protected Slope area. Based upon the current site plans no development is proposed to be located on the Sensitive or Protected slope areas. However, the proposed roadways and parking lots are proposed to be located at the top of the Sensitive and Protected slope areas with no setback. The proposed eastern building will be located approximately 50 feet from the Protected slope area. The eastern building is proposed to be located no closer than approximately 32 feet from the Sensitiveslope area The western building is proposed to be located no closer than approximately 32 feet from the Sensitive slope area. It is the opinion of GEO Group Northwest, Inc., that the proposed development c~ occur at the proposed locations with regard to the steep slope classifications. The landslide and erosion hazard risks which are associated with the development will be discussed in the following sections. The City of Renton Municipal Code requires that the Protected Slope area, unless exempted from the standards, must be designated as a Native Growth Protection area and will require permanent protection in accordance with the development code. 4.2 Landslide Hazard Areas According to the City of Renton Municipal Code landslide hazard areas are defined as: .' I. Low Landslide Hazard (LL): Areas with slopes less than fifteen percent (15%). GEO Group Northwest, Inc. . ',' --------------~----- . , , • December 6, 2006 400 Block South 37th St., Renton, Washington e,· G-2052 Page 5 2. Medium Landslide Hazard (LM): Areas with slopes between fifteen percent (15%) and forty percent (40%) and underlain by soils that consist largely of sand, gravel or glacial till. 3. High Landslide Hazards (LH); Areas with slopes greater than forty percent (40%), and areas with slopes between fifteen percent (15%) and forty percent (40%) and underlain by soils consisting largely of silt and clay. 4. Very High Landslide Hazards (LV): Areas of known mappable landslide deposits. As discussed above there are slopes at the site which range in steepness from gentle to steep with a maximum mclination of 44 percent from the horizontal. The underlying site soils consist of primarily.sandySILT, glacial till soils, which may be underlain by sedimeritary rock. According to the aforementioned definitions, Low to High Landslide Hazard areas are located at the project site. A portion of the western proposed building may be located within a High Landslide Hazard Area based upon slope inclinations at the proposed western building which range between 14 and 23 percent from the horizontaL GEO Group Northwest, Inc., is not aware of any known landslide deposits at the project site. Consequently, there are no known Very High Landslide Hazard areas at the project site. At the.time of our site investigation, we observed no signs of slope movement such as scarps or slumps, on the slopes at the project site. Due to the relatively low slope inclinations and the dense condition of the underlying soils it is the opinion ofGEO Group Northwest, Inc., that the . existing slopes at the site are stable in their current configuration. The proposed development will not increase the risk of damage as a result of landslides at the subject site. 4.3 Erosion Hazard Areas Based upon the City of Renton Municipal code, areas having slopes with inclinations of less than 15 percent are classified as having a Low Erosion Hazard. Slopes with inclinations of IS percent or greater are classified as having a High Erosion Hazard. Accordingly, we understand that both low and high erosion hazard areas are located at the project site. The majority of the project. development is located within a Low Erosion Hazard Area except a portion of the western building area which is located within a High Erosion Hazard Area GEO Group Northwest, Inc .. ,; , , , , • December 6,2006 400 Block South 3Jl' St., Renton, Washington G-20S2 Page 6 It is the opinion of GEO Group Northwest, Inc., that the proposed development presents a low risk of erosion which can be mitigated through the proper use of the following erosion control measures: a. Filter fabric fences should be installed downhill from all disturbed soil areas; b. Plastic sheeting, jute netting or other methods that are approved by the geotechnical engineer should be installed on disturbed soil areas which have an slope inclination of steeper than 40 percent. 4.4 !Hazards Risk Statement Based ,upon the GEO Group Northwest, Inc., subsurface investigation at the site and the current proposed development plans we have evaluated the project site with regard to steep 'slope, . landslide and erosion hazards and have prepared the following statements: 1. The proposed development will not increase the threat of geological hazard to adjacent properties beyond pre-development conditions provided the recolllIilendations contained herein are properly implemented; and 2. The proposed development will not adversely impact other critical areas provided the recommendations contained herein are properly implemented; and 3. The development can be safely accommodated on the site, provided the recommendations contained herein are properly implemented. 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 General Based upon the results of our study, it is our professional opinion that the site is geotechnically suitable for the proposed development. The proposed buildings can be supported on conventional spread footings bearing on the dense to very dense site soils or on compacted structural fill placed on top of the dense site soils. The overlying loose silty sand soils are not suitable to support foundations due to their loose condition. GEO Group Northwest, Inc. .. •• December 6, 2006 400 Blo~k South 37 th St., Renton, Washington • G-2052 Page 7 Because the site soils are fine-grained they are considered to be moisture sensitive and will be difficult or impossible to compact during wet weather conditions. If earthwork is planned for the Winter months we recommend that a relatively free-draining pit-run sand or gravel be imported to the site for use as structural fill. Wet site soils may be stabilized by cement treatment if necessary. Recommendations for cement treatment of site soils are included in Section 5.2.5 - Soil-Cement Stabilization. 5.2 Site Preparation and General Earthwork The building pad areas should be stripped and cleared of surface vegetation and loose soils. If yard waste and loose fills care .found within .the development areas they should be removed. Disturbance to the site should~be,kept.toa minimum. Silt fences should be installed around areaS disturbed by .construction;activity to prevent sediment-laden surface runoff from being . discharged off-site. Exposed soils that-are subject to erosion should be compacted and covered with plastic sheeting. - The proposed building foUndation areas should be excavated down to the dense native site soils, glacial till soil. Based on the findings from our soil investigation at the site, we antiCipate that the dense soil under the building areas is present between 6-inches and 2.5 feet below the existing ground surface (bgs). The dense condition of the building foundation subgrades should be field verified by GEO Group Northwest, Inc. during building pad excavation. Ifloose soils are encountered at the proposed footing sub grade elevation it may be necessary to compact the soils below the footings or replace with a compacted structural fill. 5.2. I Temporarv Excavation and Slopes Under no circumstances should temporary excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts greater than four feet in height should be sloped at an inclination no steeper than I H: I V (Horizontal: Vertical) in the loose site soils. Temporary cuts in the dense site soils may be excavated no steeper than IH:2V provided that no seepage is encountered. If groundwater seepage is encountered during construction, excavation of cut slopes should be halted and the cut slopes should be re-evaluated by GEO Group Northwest, Inc. Permanent cut slopes at the site should be inclined no steeper than 2H:I V. Permanent fill slopes should be inclined no steeper than 3H:I V without a geotechnical engineer approved design. GEO Group Northwest, Inc. ~~~~~~-~~------~~-.~-------~~---------------- .~ , • "<0} December 6,2006 400 Block South 37th St., Renton, Washington • ( G-2052 Page 8 Surface runoff should not be. allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of slopes into the excavated area. During wet weather exposed cut slQpes should be covered with plastic sheeting during construction to minimize erosion. 5.2.2 Structural Fill All fill material used to achieve design site elevations below the building area and below non- .structurally supported slabs, parking lots, sidewalks, driveways, and patios, should meet the requirements for structural fill. During wet weather conditions, material to be used as structural fill should have the following specifications: 1. Be free draining, granular material containing no more than five (5) percent fmes (silt;and . clay-size particles passing the No. 200 .mesh sieve); 2. Be free of orgimic :material and other deleterious substances; 3. Have a maximum size of three (3) inches in diameter. All fill material should be placed at or near the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is the water content in soil that enables the soil to be compacted to the highest dry density for a given compaction effort. , The majority of the on-site soils will be moisture-sensitive because they consist of silty SAND and sandy SILT soils. If these soils are too wet they will be very difficult or impossible to compact because of their silt content. Consequently, if work is to occur during the wet winter months it may be necessary to import a free-draining granular fill which can be compacted to meet the structural fill specifications. Ideally this material would have less than 5% passing the No. 200 sieve. If the on-site soils are to be used as engineered structural fill, it will be necessary to segregate the topsoil and any other orgimic-or debris-containing soil, because such soils would be unsuitable for use as structural fill. Excavated on-site material that is stockpiled for later use as strijctura! fill should be protected from rainfall or contamination with unsuitable materials by covering it with plastic sheeting until it is used. Structural fill should be placed in thin horizontal lifts not exceeding ten inches in loose thickness. Structural fill under building areas (Including foundation and slab areas), should be compacted to GEO Group Northwest, Inc. ," .' . December 6, 2006 G-2052 Page 9 400 Block South 37th St.;Renton, Washington at least 95 percent maximum dry density, as determined by AS1M Test Designation D-1557-91 (Modified Proctor). Structural fill under parking lots and sidewalks should be compacted to at least 90 percent maximum dry density, as determined by AS1M Test Designation D-1557-91 (Modified Proctor). Fill placed within 12-inches offinish grade should meet the 95% requirement. We recommend that GEO Group Northwest, Inc., be retained to evaluate the suitability of structural fill material and to monitor the compaction work during construction for quality assurance of the earthwork. 5.2.3 Site Work During Wet Weather·' During wet weather we recommend excavating to within a few inches, or more,.above the final sub grade elevation of slabs and footings to protect .the moisture sensitive site soils if the subgrade . soils are to be exposed to weather for an extended period of time. Final excavation can be accomplished later to remove unsuitable material and minimize subgrade exposure. Alternatively, the subgrade can be protected .with a 4 inch layer of 1-1/4 inch crushed rock or lean mix concrete, dependent on the disturbed site conditions and weather conditions. Construction traffic should be minimized on the slab and building foundation subgrades. 5.2.4 Subgrade Stabilization Following preparation of the subgrade under pavement areas, we recommend proof-rolling the subgrade with a piece of heavy construction equipment, such as a fully loaded dump truck, to verify that the sub grade is unyielding. Proof-rolling should be performed under the direction and observation of the geotechnical engineer, Soft areas may require over-excavation and replacement with compacted structural fill material, or other subgrade stabilization measures. To stabilize yielding building pads, foundation subgrade, and pavement subgrade soils, we recommend separating and confming the soft site soils with a woven geotextile fabric such as Mirafi 500X, or equivalent, and bridging with an aggregate above the fabric. The bridging material may consist of pit run sand and gravel, 1-1/2" minus crushed rock, quarry rock, crushed recycled concrete, or other locally available material acceptable to the geotechnical engineer. The:amount of material required to bridge will depend on the condition of the sub grade and the type of bridging material used. GEO Group Northwest, Inc., should be contacted to evaluate the subgrade conditions prior to paving or foundation construction. As an alternative to using a GEO Group Northwest, Inc. I ----~---- • • December 6, 2006 400 Block South 37th St., Renton, Washington geotextile reinforced aggregate bridging material the site soils could be cement treated as described below. 5.2.5 Soil-Cement Stabilization G-2052 Page 10 For on-site soils that prove to be unsatisfactory as a sub grade base for foundations, floor slabs, sidewalks and driveways, a soil cement treatment program can be implemented to improve the subgrade condition and wet weather performance. In addition, if site soils are too wet to be used as structural fill they may be mixed with cement and placed as structljral fill. Cement treatment consists of mixing cement into.a minimum .12-inch thickness of the site'soil, creating a cement treated base (<=:TB).Over large ,areas cement treatment is usually ,performed j)y tilling cement into the site soil. The cement treatment should extend down to firm ·soils. 'Thesite, should be pre-graded prior to cement treatment to prevent cutting or removing the minimum thickness of CTB during the final grading process. The rate of cement application is dependent on the moisture content of the soil and typically varies from about 4 percent to 8 percent (43 lbs to 86 lbs per square yard for a I-foot deep treatment), based on dry weight. Based on our experience, an average application rate of about 5 percent or 55.4 lbs of cement per square yard for a one-foot deep treatment should be adequate to stabilize the onsite soils. Procedurally, a standard Portland cement is applied in dry powder form to the surface of the ground and tilled into the soil with a tilling machine .. The cement can also be mixed with site soils in batches by an excavator. In this case the machine operator should be experienced in soil- cement mixing to insure the proper mixing ratio. Immediately following soil-cement mixing and grading the subgrade should be compacted by a large vibratory machine .. Accordingly, cement- treated fills can be built up by placing 12-inch thicknesses of mixed soil-cement and compacting at the surface of each lift. 5.3 Spread Footing Foundations The proposed buildings can be supported on conventional spread footings bearing on the dense site soils or on compacted structural fill placed on top of the dense site soils. Based on the findings from our soil investigation at the site, we anticipate that the dense soils are present between 6-inches and 2.5 feet below ground surface at the building locations . . GEO Group Northwest, Inc. • December 6, 2006 . 400 Block South 37th, St., Renton, Washington • G-2052 Page II Individual spread footings may be used for supporting columns and strip footings for bearing walls. Our recommended minimum design criteria for foundations bearing on the dense site soils or on compacted structural fiJI are as follows: Allowable bearing pressure, Dense native soil Compacted structural fiJI including all dead and live loads = 4,000 psf = 2,500 psf -Minimum depth to bottom of perimeter footing below adjacent final exterior grade = 18 inches -Minimum depth to bottom of interior footings below top of floor slab = J 8 'inches -Minimum width of waJl footings = 16 inches -Minimum lateral dimension of column footings = 24 inches -Estimated post-construction settlement = 114 inch -Estimated post-construction differential settlement; across building width = 114 inch A one-third increase in the above allowable bearing pressures can be used when considering short-term transitory wind or seismic loads . . Lateral loads can also be resisted by friction between the foundation and the supporting compacted fiJI sub grade or by passive earth pressure acting on the buried portions of the foundations. For the latter, the foundations must be poured "neat" against the existing undisturbed soil or be backfilled with a compacted fill meeting the requirements for structural fill. Our recommended parameters are as follows: -Passive Pressure (Lateral Resistance) • 350 pcf equivalent fluid weight for compacted structural fill • 350 pcf equivalent fluid weight for native dense soil. -Coefficient of Friction (Friction Factor) • 0.35 for compacted structural fill • 0.35 for native dense soil GEO Group Northwest, Inc. , '. " • December 6, 2006 400 Block South 37'h St., Renton, Washington • G-2052 Page 12 The allowable passive pressure and coefficient of friction may be increased by 33% to resist temporary loads imposed by wind and seismic forces, We recommend that footing drains be placed around all perimeter footings, More specific details of perimeter foundation drains are provided below in Section 5.6.2 -Footing Drains. 5.4 Permanent Basement and Conventional Retaining Walls The preliminary plans indicate that both buildings will have daylight basements with 10 foot tall retaining walls, We recommend that the basement retaining walls be designed and constructed in accordance with the following guidelines, Permanent basement walls restrained horizontally on top are considered unyielding and should be designed for a lateral soil pressure under the at-rest condition; while conventional reinforced concrete walls free to rotate on top should be designed for an active lateral soil pressure, . Active Earth Pressure Conventional reinforced concrete walls that are designed to yield an amount equal to 0,002 times the wall height, should be designed to resist the lateral earth pressure imposed by an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of: • 35 pcffor level backfill behind yielding retaining walls For seismically induced lateral loads the designer should use an additional 6H psf where H is . the height of the retaining wall. At-Rest Earth Pressure Walls supported horizontally by floor slabs are considered unyielding and should be designed for lateral soil pressure under the at-rest condition. The lateral soil pressure design should have an equivalent fluid pressure of: • 45 pcf for level ground behind permanent unyielding retaining walls For seismically induced lateral loads the designer should use an additional 6H psfwhere H is the height of the retaining wall. GEO Group Northwest, Inc, r ' • • December 6, 2006 G-2052 400 Block South 37'" St., Renton, Washington Page 13 Passive Earth Pressure and Base Friction The available passive earth pressure that can be mobilized to resist lateral forces may be assumed to be equal to 350 pcf equivalent fluid weight for the undisturbed dense glacial till soils and 350 pcffor compacted structural backfill. The base friction that can be generated between concrete and undisturbed bearing soils or engineered structural backfill may be based on an assumed 0.35 friction coefficient. The allowable passive pressure and coefficient of friction may be increased by 33% to resist temporary loads imposed bywind and seismic' forces. We recommend that a vertical drain mat, Miradrain 6000 or equivalent, be used to facilitate drainage behind conventional retaining or basement walls. The drain mat core is placed' against the wall with the filter fabric side facing the backfill. The drain mat extends from the fmished surface grade, down to the' footing drain pipe. In addition to the drain mat, we recommend that the backfill for the basement walls consist of compacted free-draining material. WaH drainage recommendations and installation procedures should be followed per Plate 4, Typical Basement Wall Backfill and Drainage Detail. Backfill material behind conventional retaining and basement walls should be compacted to 90 percent of the maximum dry density determined by ASTM D 1557-78 (Modified Proctor Method). The backfill in areas adjacent to the walls should be compacted with hand held equipment to avoid damaging the wall. 5.5 Slab-on-Grade Floors The slab-on-grade floors may be placed on the medium dense to dense site soils or on compacted structural fill placed on top of the dense site soils provided that the sub grade is firm and unyielding at'the time of slab construction. The unyielding condition of the slab subgrade floors should be verified at the time of construction by proof-rolling under the geotechnical engineer's supervision. To avoid moisture build~up on the subgrade, slab-on-grade floors should be placed on a capillary break, which is in turn placed on the prepared sub grade. The capillary break should consist of a minimum of a six (6) inch thi"k layer of free-draining crushed rock or gravel containing no more GEO Group Northwest, Inc. • December 6, 2006 400 Block South 37 th St., Renton, Washington • G-2052 ' Page 14 than five (5) percent fmer than No.4 sieve. A vapor bamer, such as a 10-mil plastic membrane, is recommended to be placed over the capillary break beneath the slab to reduce water vapor transmission through the slab. Two to four inches of sand may be placed over'the bamer membrane for protection during constniction. 5.6 Drainage 5.6.1 Surface Drainage The dense glacial till site soils are relatively impermeable, except where sand lenses occur. Consequently, the fmished grades should be graded such that surface water is directed away from ·.the buildings. 'S.6.2Footing Drains We recommend that drains be installed around the perimeter of the foundation footings and, at the base ofretaining walls. The drains should consist ofa four (4) inch minimum diameter, perforated or slotted, rigid drain pipe laid at or near the bottom of the footing with a gradient sufficient til generate flow. The drain line should be bedded on, surrounded by, and covered with a free-draining rock, pea gravel, or other free-draining granular material. The drain rock and drain line should be completely surrounded by a geotextile filter fabric, Mirafi 140N or equivalent. Once the drains are installed, the excavation should be backfIlled with a compacted, structural fill material. The footing drains should be tightlined to discharge into the storm water collection system. Under no circumstances should roof downspout drain lines be cOrlnected to the footing drainage system. All roof downspouts must be separately tightlined to discharge into the storm water collection system. We recommend that sufficient cleanouts be installed at strategic locations to allow for periodic maintenance of the footing drains and downspout tightline systems. 6.0 LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared for the specific application to this site for the exclusive use of Mr. Cliff Williams of Springbrook Office Park, LLC and his authorized representatives. We recommend that this report be included in its entirety in the project contract documents for use by the contractor. GEO Group Northwest, Inc. " , • December 6, 2006 400 Block South 37'h St: Renton, Washington • G-2052 Page 15 Our fmdings and recommendations stated herein are based onfield observations, our experience and judgement The recommendations are our professional opinion derived in a manner . consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area and within the budget constraint, No warranty is expressed or implied. In the event the soil conditions are found to vary during site excavation, GEO Group Northwest, Inc, should be notified and the above recommendation should. be re-evaluated, 7.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES We recommend ,that GEO Group Northwest Inc, be retained to perform a general review of the fmal design and specifications of the proposed development to verify that the earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the desigri and in tIie'comtructiondocuments, We ,also recommend that GEO Group Northwest Inc, lie retained to provide monitoring and testing services for geotechnically·related work during construction, This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event substance conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. We anticipate the following construction monitoring inspections may be necessary: 1. Site clearing and grubbing; 2. Verification of bearing soil conditions for foundations; 3, Structural fill placement and compaction; 4, Subsurface drainage installation; 5, Slab-on-grade preparation including proof-rolling; We appreciate this opportunity to have been of service to you on this project. We look forward to working with you as this project progresses, Should you have any questions regarding this report or need additional consultation, please feel free to call us. GEO Group Northwest, Inc, ' ,------------------- I , . , . • December 6, 2006 400 Block South 37'h St., Renton, Washington Sincerely, GEO Group Northwest, Inc. Adam Gaston Proj eet Engineer d~.~ William Chang, P.E. Principal EXPIRES: 21191 ~.. , ... GEO Group Northwest, Inc. • G-20S2 Page 16 , , ILLUSTRATIONS G-20S2 GEO Group Northwest, Inc. • ----------------------------------- . .-~ • '.~ .. SCALE: NONE DATE: 1211/06 MADE: AG 'CHKD: • VICINITY MAP PROPOSED MEDICAL/OFFICE CENTER 400 BLOCK SOUTH 37TH ST. RENTON, WASHINGTON we JOB NO: G·2052 PLATE PLAN BASED UPON TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PROVIDED BY SPRINGBROOK OFFICE PARK, LLC, PREPARED BY ,,-rt:Tt'". n . = TEST PIT NUMBER AND . ~P-l APPROXIMATE LOCATION .. SlREAt.t UnuTY CB R'U El=82.27 S. 37TH ST. C8 RI". IE 8" CMP(N)=78.61 IE 8" CMP(S)=78.61 IE 12" CldP(W)= 78.06 IE 12" CldP(E)=78.31 CB RIN El=85.91 IE 8" CMP(N)=82.61 IE 8" CMP(S)=82.61 CB RIU EL=84.73 IE 8" CMP(N)=82.78 LOT 2 ;" OJ LOT 1 SP 67808151009 SP 17808151009 GATE POST C8 RIU EL=90.77 IE 8" CMP(S)=87.97 , CB RI.. EL=90.77 IE 8" CMP(N)=87.37 IE 12" CMP(E)=86.87 IE 12" CMP(S)=8S.22 PUBUC STREET UGHT EASEUENT AfN 8207140376 LOT 3 iG ;" OJ SP 17808151009 SITE PLAN 7' UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EASEMENT AFN 780421OB3J 'MlHIN THIS AREA PROPOSED MEDICAL/OFFICE CENTER 400 BLOCK SOUTH 37TI1 ST. RENTON, WASHINGTON -:-". , -j \ .1---------------, ~PDTlT~ROOK"--5, "ll'l."1IJ.., , , :::-Off1CE.. CEtlTf8. , « -ZC"'lP"·'·· --,CO'" .. f.!lotoS1!D' U'>I. 'Of1'lta ,~ '-----'~~~::~.~-=~. .... ~' .. -... "'0 ..... t t.._ .. i.~ .-~~~ ... « ... lQ,P--'l,""""-"Sr.. •.. ,,.. .~~. 1~-~Os:r-=IS'::m;1i;I • ~~~, 3';1. : . 'Z"~ '. ~:s . . :z: ' ., • \. , ' . i \ \ i i' \ , \ \ " 'ol&, ,oO~:~.· ·P:~-- ~ .. .. LEGEND, , !- .: { SrTE OSOEClloQ , , ' PLAN BASED UPON PRELIMINARY PLAN PROVIDED BY' SPRINGBROOK ' OFFICE PARK, LLC, PREPARED BY' ~ = TEST PIT NUMBER AND , ' ,TP~l APPROXIMATE LOCATION, OTIffiRS.-" f 131'toNB ___ to,_WA-~ ~42Sl649-87S7 "FAX42Sf649--87S! . mf'@g gloupu.! . aT. ........ ~-.. ' '~' .~ ...... 'T ------.-~ ~ - - ---- ... _A?""" c:, fR1NGf,~~ .. 1!ID)fCA,L .~-'~-, = . . :Z0l'l1 '"'~: . c::.o f> 12c~~~: MEo~'-oFi:=tee. ' .. . ·1!>U1L.DiN~ ~ru.·: z f'fJlUe~ . , 1<,,8SD~ 0'/lI'l2; . I \.JE'4S.. 'oF ~ f~2.~t4~ ~b:"c$~1Aa6I~ c?$F_-, :, ", .' \ /t#J 4" ~&JSlItJS . . ". . ~CZt4w, PI1OtlIlE1:>: . ~f"Ett iA1" Sl ' ~ . . ""N~."·'24: ",""'en'\.OT 1.1· . ',es;",. "t?', ~ PROPOSED SITE PLAN PROPO~ED MEDICAL/OFFICE CENTER , , 400 BLOCK SOUTH 37TH ST. ' RE\'ITON,W ASHINGTON .. .. • • Basement Wall Vertical Drain Mal (Mlrtidrain 6000 or equal) Relatively Impermeable Free draining material, (Washed rock or Crushed rock) Geo/utile (Mirafi 140 N orequalj 4 or 6 inch diameter slotted or perforated PVC pipe NOTES: COMPACTED FREE-DRAINING BACKFILL MATERIAL NOT TO SCALE L) Do not replace rigid PVC pipe with flexible corrugated plastic pipe. 2.) Perforated PVC pipe should be tight jointed and laid with , perforations down 'at the 5 and 7 o'clock position. The pipe shall have a positive gradient to discharge. 3.) Do not connect roof downspout drains into the foundation drain lines. 4.) Exterior backfill should be compacted in lifts to a firm and unyielding condition. TYPICAL BASEMENT WALL BACKFILL AND DRAINAGE DETAIL 400 BLOCK SOUTH 37TH ST. RENTON, WASHINGTON SCALE NONE DATE 12/01/2006 MADE AG CHKD we JOB NO. G-20S2 PLATE 4 . , . • -------------------------------------- • APPENDIX A: TEST PIT LOGS 0-2052 GEO Group Northwest, Inc . . " '4. • • LEGEND OF SOIL CLASSIFICATION AND PENETRATION TEST UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (USCS) MAJOR DIVISION CROUP TYPICAL DESCRIPnON LABORATORY CLASSIFICA nON CRITERIA SYMBOL CLEAN GW WELL GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND eu" (060 I 010) grealorthan '" GRAVELS MIXTURE, UTIlE OR NO FINES DETERMINE Co .. (0302) I (010· DeO) between 1 and 3 PERCENTAGES OF NOT MEETING ABOVE REQUIREMENTS GRAVELS (Uttle or no GP PODRl Y GRADED GRAVELS, AND GRAVEl·SAND GRAVEL AND SAND (More Than Half IInell) MIXTURES LITTLE OR NO FINES FROM GRAIN SIZE COARSE-Coarse Grains DISTRIBUTION GRAINED SOilS larger Than No ... CURVE ATTERBERG lIMrrs BELOW Sieve) DIRTY GM SIL TV GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND-SIL T MIXTURES "Ao LINE. GRAVELS CONTENT 0( P.I. LESS THAN '" OF FINES CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEl-SANO-CLAY EXCEEDS 12% AITERBERG WITS ABOVE (with aama GC COARSe GRAINED ~N LINE. fines) MIXTURES SQILSARE or Pol. MORE THAN 7 CLASSIFIED AS Cu" (080 I 01Q) greater !han 6 SANDS CLEAN SW WELL GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SANDS, FOLLOWS: LlIne: OR NO FINES Cc;; (0302) I (010·060) between 1 and 3 SANDS (Mora Than Half ~IHla orno POORLY GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SANDS, < 5% Flna Grained: MOfa Than Half Coarsa Grains SP NOT MEETING ABOVE RECUIREMENTS IInas) LlTILE OR NO FINES GW, GP, SW, SP by Walght Larger Smallar Than No. Than No. 200 4 Sieve) ATTERBERG LIMITS BELOW :Slavo SM Sil. TY SANDS, SAND-SIL T MIXTURES > 12% Fine Grelned: "A-LINE DIRTY SANDS GM, GC, SM, SC CONTENT OF with P.1. LESS THAN . 4 FINES (with loma 5 to 12% Fine EXCEEDS 12% ATrERBERG LIMITS ABOVE se CLAYEY SANDS, SAND-CLAY MIXTURES Grainad: un dual "A"UNE flnel) symboll with, P.t. MORE THAN 7 , SilTS Liquid Limit ML INORGANIC SILTS, ROCK FLOUR, SANOY SILTS , , < 50"4 OF SLIGHT PLASTICITY 60 (Below A-llna on PLASTICITY CHART VI At' r-V PlastiCity Chart, INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR FOR SOIL PASSING FINE-GRAINED Liquid Umlt 50 SOILS Negligible Organic) >50% MH DIATOMACEOUS, FINE SANOY OR SIL TV SOIL ~ NO, 40 SIEVE C~ ",6H V INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY, :l 40 V CLAYS Uquld Limit CL GRAVELLY, SANOY, OR Sil. TV CLAYS, CLEAN C V 1/ (Above A-Une on <30% CLAYS !!; ~ 30 Plact1dty Chart, Uquld Limit INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT VClorOl / Negligible Organic) CH ~ >50% CLAYS 20 More Than Half .. ~ V V . by Weight Smalle Liquid Limit OL ORGANI~ SIL T8 AND ORGANIC SIL TV CLAYS OF "-rr,--Than No. 200 ORGANIC SIL T8 < 50% lOW PLASTICITY 10 Slave & CLAYS 7 OL ML (Below A-Una on Uquid Limit d Plactidty Chart) >50% OH ORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY 0 10 20 30 .0 60 70 .0 90 100 110 LlaUID LIMIT (%) HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PI PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS SOIL PARTICLE SIZE GENERAL GUIDANCE OF SOIL ENGINEERING PROPERTieS FROM STANDARD PENETRATION TEST {SPT} U.S. STANDARD SIEVE FRACTION Passing Retained SANDY SOilS SIL TV & CLAYEY SOILS Sieve Size Sieve SI"" Relative Friction 610w Unconfined Blow (mm) (mm) Counts Density Angll Deaaiption Counts Strength Oela1ption BJlT I CLAY #200 0.075 N " ¢I, degree N q,.'" §6!!2 0,4 0·15 Very Loo .. <, < 0.25 Very toft FINE #40 0.425 "00 0,075 4 -10 15·35 26 ·30 Loosa , '. d.25 -0,50 Soft MEDIUM #10 2 #40 0.425 10·30 35 ·65 28 ·35 Medium Dense .'. 0,50·1.00 Mlldlum Stiff COARSE #4 4.75 #10 , 30-50 65· 85 35· 42 Dansa B -15 1.00·2,00 S,. -> 60 85 -100 38-46 Very Oenla 15·30 2.00·4,00 Vary Stiff FINE 10 .. 4,75 > 30 > 4,00 HOI. COARSE 7. ,. COBBLES 76 mm to 203 mm G!"Up l"II onn'n'""n, InC. >203 mm BOULDERS Geotechnical Engineers, Geologists, & ROCK environmental Scientists >76mm FRAGMENTS 13240 NE 20th Strlat, Suita12 Bellevue, WA 98005 ROCK >0.76 cubic meter in volume Phone (425) 649·8767 Fax (425) 649-8758 PLATE A1 . \.. ..,', .. DEPTH It. . - - -5 _ - - -10 _ LOGGED BY USCS SM! , , ML , ---- ML .-: . . , I -: , ! , .. j .., - 15_ LOGGED BY DEPTH ;1 It. USCS -SM - --_. ---- SM/ -ML 5 _ .------ ML - - -10 _ - - - - 15 _ • • TEST PIT NO . TP-l .. AG TEST PIT DATE: 06/02/2005 SAMPLE Water OTHER TESTSt SOIL DESCRIPTION No. % COMMENTS Brown to mottled silty SAND t sandy SILT with some gravel and Probe 1·2" occassional cobbles, moist, dense Probe 112" -------------------------------------------------- Mottled sandy SILT and SILT, moist, dense Probe 112" Total depth oftest pit = 7' bgs No groundwater seepage observed TEST PIT NO. TP-2 . AO TEST PIT DATE: 06/0212005 SAMPLE Water OTHER TESTSt SOIL DESCRIPTION No. % COMMENTS Probe 3-5" Silty SAND with some gravel, moist, dense Probe 2" --------------------------------------------------Probe 1/4" Silty SAND / sandy SILT with some gravel and occasional boulders, moist. ,dense --------------------------------------------------Brown sandy SILT with some gravel and cobbles, moist, dense Total depth cflest pit = 6' bgs No groundwater seepage observed TEST PIT LOGS PROPOSED MEDICAL/OFFICE CENTER .c.;'UUIJ' Nu.l '"n'",i3t, Inc; 400 BLOCK SOUTH 37TH ST. Geotechnical Engineer., Goologista, & RENTON, WASHINGTON Envlronmental5clentlsta JOB NO. 0·2052 DATE. 11/17/06 PLATE A2 -- ---------------------------------------------------------~ . .. \ L >.. • • • - TEST PIT NO. TP-3 LOGGED BY AG TEST PIT DATE: 06/02/2005 DEPTH SAMPLE Water OTHER TESTSI It. USCS SOIL DESCRIPTION No. % COMMENTS SM Dark brown silty SAND, moiSL loose Probe 8"-2' ---------------------------------------------------------- -ML Brown sandy SILT with some gravel, moist, loose -----------------------------------------------------------. . ML _~r.?~_ s~~~ ~!~ ~ ~~t.?_p_i::e_ <:f_b_u~t_ ~<:<:~ ~O!~l: ~:~._ ~e.?~: _____ Probe 1-3" ------Sandy SaT with some gravel becoming cemented sedimentary rock 5 _ .......... ML fragments, moist, dense to very dense .. Total depth of test pit = 4.5' bgs · No groundwater seepage observed · · 10 _ - .- - -, 15 - - TEST PIT NO. TP-4 LOGGED BY AG TEST PIT DATE: 06/0212005 i DEPTH SAMPLE Water OTHER TESTSI ft. USCS SOIL DESCRIPTION No. % COMMENTS '-. SM • ~~!<.b-,~~ ..sll!y. ~~~ ~e!--'~2~e. ________________________ Probe 1"004" ----- " SM Brown fine silty SAND with some gravel, moist, dense Probe 114" -I" ---------Br~~ ·sandY siLT with -som~ -g;.;;ei Mel incit7d-es cemented -------- · '-... MT. sedimentary rock pieces, moist, dense to very dense 5 _ · Total depth of test pil c 4' bgs · No groundwater seepage observed · · 10 _ · · , · · 15 _ TEST PIT LOGS Group North'n'~:n, Inc. PROPOSED MEDICAL/OFFICE CENTER 400 BLOCK SOUTH 37TH ST. I Geotechncal Engileer., GeolOgists, & EnvironrTBntal Sclentlsta RENTON, WASHINGTON JOB NO. G-2052 . DATE 11/17/06 PLATE A3 " .. ~ " • • TEST PIT NO. TP-5 , LOGGED BY AG TEST PIT DATE: 06/0212005 DEPTH SAMPLE Water OTHER TEST5I It. USCS SOIL DESCRIPTION No. % COMMENTS SM! Probe 2' . 2.5' -ML Dark brown silty SAND 1 sandy SILT, wet, very loose . ----------------------------------------------------------Probe 1_3 11 -........ ML Sandy and clayey SILT, wet, dense - 5 _ Total depth crtest pit = 3' bgs Groundwater seepage observed at 18-inches bgs - - - -10 _ - I " -, . ...:: ',' i '~'" I . .! .. 15_ TEST PIT NO. . LOGGED BY TEST PIT DATE: DEPTH SAMPLE Water OTHER TESTSI It. USCS SOIL DESCRIPTION No. % COMMENTS - - -5 _ - - - - 10 _ - -, - -15 _ I ............. TEST PIT LOGS Cllli) Group Northwest, Inc. PROPOSED MEDICAL/OFFICE CENTER 400 BLOCK SOUTH 37TH ST. --Geotechnical B1glneers, Geologists, & I -RENTON,WASEITNGTON Environmental Scientists . . JOB NO. G-2052 DATE 11/17/06 PLATE A4 ---------- .J l~~ ,. CITY OF RENTON , 1055 S. Grady Way -~\,...,. Renton, WA 98055 >JE\.O!'lA~~ENT01'I ;.E CI1'l 0 . --------------~UG \'31\\\\1 Printed: 08-13-2007 Payment Made: Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA07 -086 08/13/2007 09:42 AM ~~C~\'JEO Receipt Number: R0704192 Total Payment: 2,500.00 Payee: VALLEY VIEW PROF OFFICE DEV LLC Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check #101 2,500.00 Account Balances Amount 500.00 2,000.00 Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 303.000.00.345.85 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Park Mitigation Fee Annexation Fees Appeals/Waivers Binding Site/Short Plat Conditional Use Fees Environmental Review Prelim/Tentative Plat Final Plat PUD Grading & Filling Fees Lot Line Adjustment Mobile Home Parks Rezone Routine Vegetation Mgrnt Shoreline Subst Dev Site Plan Approval Temp Use or Fence Review Variance Fees Conditional Approval Fee Comprehensive Plan Amend Booklets/EIS/Copies Maps (Taxable) Special Deposits Postage Tax .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 l