The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA-07-090_Report 01Richard & Lauralee Gordley 12819 SE 38th Street PMB #206 Bellevue, WA 98006 tel: (425) 652-3194 ( owner / contact) Updated: 06/24/08 PARTIES OF RECORD GORDLEY / DENZLER LLA LUA0?-090, LLA Christian & Lisa Denzler 1800 NE 20th Street Renton, WA 98056 (owner) (Page 1 of 1) --- From: Rocale Timmons To: Stacy Tucker CC: Jennifer Henning Date: 6/23/2008 4:05 PM Subject: Party of Record Change (LUAG7 131 Blueberry f-1aven Short Plat; LUA07-090 Gordley/Denzler LLA) Hey Stacy, Can you change the Owner information (address and phone number) for the above mentioned land use files. Lauralee & Richard Gordley 12819 SE 38th Street PMB #206 Bellevue. WA 98006 425-652-3194 Let me know if you have any questions. Rocale Timmons City of Renton Development Services 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 (425) 430-7219 (425) 430-7300 rtimmons@ci.renton.wa.us CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: August 19, 2008 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: LUA (file) Number: Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Acceptance Date: Applicant: Owner: Contact: PID Number: ERC Decision Date: ERC Appeal Date: Administrative Approval: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Mylar Recording Number: Gordley/Denzler Lot Line Adjustment LUA-07-090, LLA Jill Ding / Rocale Timmons August 20, 2007 Lauralee Gordley Richard & Lauralee Gordley same as applicant 3343903563; 3343903200 July 25, 2008 August 12, 2008 20080804900005 Date: Date: Project Description: The applicants are requesting a lot line adjustment that would result in changes to two existing lot lines. One would allow the applicant to sell the east portion of their property to their neighbors to the east and south of them and the other would result in the creation of two rectangularly shaped lot and allow for the sale of one lot for the construction of a new single family residence. A category 3 wetland and a class 4 stream have been identified on the subject ro ert . Location: 2010 Jones Ave NE & 1800 NE 20th St Comments: .) DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM July 31, 2008 City Clerk's Office Rocale Timmons, Planning, x7219 GordleyIDenzler Lot Line Adjustment; File No. LUA07-090, LLA Attached please find two sets of the above-referenced mylar and three copies for recording with King County. Please have Champion Couriers take these documents via: Same-day service ($13.81)-10:00 AM deadline to City Clerk Attached is a check for the amount of$13.81 for the fee to Champion Couriers. According to Finance, the King County recording fees for this and all subsequent plat recordings should be charged to account #000/007.590.0060.49.000014. Please call me at x7219 if you have any questions. Thank you. cc: Yellow file Property Services Jan Conklin Lauralee & Richard Gordley, Christian & Lisa Marie Denzler/ Owner CIT' OF RENTON Department of Community and Economic Development Denis Law, Mayor Alex Pietsch, Administrator Lauralee Gordley 2010 Jones Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 SUBJECT: Gordley/Denzler Lot Line Adjustment File No. LUA07-090, LLA Dear Mrs. Gordley: The City of Renton has finished reviewing your proposed lot line adjustment and is now ready to approve and send the final version for recording. Please submit two sets of original signed mylars and a check for $13.81 made out to Champion Couriers to my attention at the sixth floor counter of City Hall. Please verify that the mylars have been signed by all owners ofrecord and have been notarized with an ink stamp (not embossed). The ink stamp must be legible so that King County will promptly record the lot line adjustment. This decision to approve the proposed lot line adjustment is subject to a fourteen (14) day appeal period from the date of this letter. Any appeals of the administrative decision must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5:00 pm, August 12, 2008. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, I 055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-1 I 0. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have further questions regarding this project, please call me at ( 425) 430-7219. Sincerely, ,---1~ ' ./ )\ ( { {v~ ,: ~._)i.,,. .,~'vi'f',yj (,;;_- Rocale Timmons Associate Planner cc: Christian & Lisa Denzler/ Owner Yellow file -------10_5_5_S_ou_th_G_ra_d_y_W_a_y __ -R-en_t_on-,-W-as_h_in_gt_o_n_9_80_5_7 ______ ~ @ This paper oontains 50% recycled material, 30% post i::onsumer AHEAD OF THE CURVF. DATE: TO: CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNTY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM July 22, 2008 Sonja Fesser, Property Services FROM:Rocale Timmons, Current Planning, x7219 SUBJECT: Gordley Lot Line Adjustment, File No. LUA07-090, LLA Attached is the most recent version of the above-referenced lot line adjustment. If all Property Services concerns have been addressed and you are now able to recommend recording of the mylar, please initial this memo below and return to me as soon as possible. However, if you have outstanding concerns or require additional information in order to recommend recording, please let me know. Thank you. d 1 (;.~4 I c:t., Date 7', ... 0_._.~.,_,.,,,,;., .......... 2(17'/'r ..... i .... -k~t .... o .... ot .... k~l-~o-='7r/es /o e, Sonja J(Jes~j' Dfute cc: Yellow File H:\Division.s\Develop.ser\Dev&plan.ing\PROJECTS\07-090.Jill-Rocale\Approval Memo (3) 07-090.doc . , . . , DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM July 25, 2008 Rocale Timmons Sonja J. Fesser .J5f Gordley/Denzler Lot Line Adjustmeut, LUA-07-090-LLA Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced lot line adjustment submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant: The "APPROVALS" block for the City of Renton includes signature lines for the Mayor, City Clerk and Finance Director. These city officials do not sign lot line adjustment mylars. Remove said signature lines and titles from said block. The city official who does sign lot line adjustments, the Administrator of Public Works, is incorrectly identified as the "Administrator-Planning/Building/Public Works". Correct the title. \H:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-30-l.ot Line Adjustments\0332\RV080723.doc DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM July 15, 2008 Rocale Timmons Sonja J. Fesser JS!! Gordley/Denzler Lot Line Adjustment, LUA-07-090-LLA Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced lot line adjustment submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant: The word "ADMINISTRATOR" is misspelled in the City of Renton approval block. There is no approval block shown for King County. Include signature lines as needed. Note that said block should be separate from the City of Renton approval block. If the third acknowledgment block is not used, then it should be removed from the final submittal. Remove the "VERTICAL DATUM" block. Revise the "DECLARATION" block to include the word "OWNERS"' as a prefix to the existing title. No new access and/or utilities easements have been identified on the latest submittal. If no new easement(s) exists, then the "PRIVATE ACCESS AND UTILITIES MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT" statement (Sheet 1 of 2) needs to be removed from said sheet. The "LEGEND" on Sheet 2 of 2 references a hatch for the wetland area. Said hatch does not appear on the lot line adjustment drawing. The "NATIVE GROWTH AND PROTECTION AREA EASEMENT" statement, as shown on the lot line adjustment drawing (Sheet 2 of 2), makes reference to "SEE CROSS HATCH". Said "cross hatch" is not identified in the "LEGEND". \H:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-30 -Lot line Adjustments\0332\RY080703.doc July 15, 2008 Page 2 See the attachment for a statement to be noted on the final submittal regarding the "NATNE GROWTH AND PROTECTION AREA EASEMENT". The second item under the "EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD" block (Sheet 1 of 2) refers to a utilities easement that was recorded under Rec. No. 8106290604. Said easement was released under Rec. No. 9604170910, not Rec. No. 8805099006, as is currently noted. H:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-30 -Lot Line Adjustments\0332\RV080703.doc\cor ' 1 NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT The Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) on this short plat identifies the required wetland buffer area for the wetlands on adjacent parcels. The creation of the Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land within the easement area. This interest shall be for the purpose of preserving native vegetation for the control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, visual and aural buffering, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The Native Growth Protection Easement imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the Easement area enforceable on behalf of the public by the City of Renton, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the easement area. The vegetation within.the NGPE may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or damaged, without the expressed written permission from the City of Ren~ ") The right of entry granted herein shall apply to me agents, representative and employees of the owners or subsequent owners of the underlying property. DATE: TO: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM June 24, 2008 Sonja Fesser, Property Services FROM: Rocale Timmons, Development/Planning, x7289 ''"' ;J 4 SUBJECT: Gordley I Denzler Lot Line Adjustment, File No. LUA0?-090, LLA Attached is the most recent version of the above-referenced lot line adjustment. If all Property Services concerns have been addressed and you are now able to recommend recording of the mylar, please initial this memo below and return to me as soon as possible. However, if you have outstanding concerns or require additional information in order to recommend recording, please let me know. Thank you. Property Services approval: Robert T. Mac Onie, Jr. PLS Date Sonja J. Fesser Date cc: Yellow File Document1 C;'-~')'Y ~,-c; ·CITY 4'F RENTON + f~ I<' + Department of Community and _ Economic Development ~ -~ Denis Law, Mayor Alex Pietsch, Administrator . ~N~o:;,-~~---~~~~~~~~~~~~...;;;;~;;.;;;;.;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;.;;.;;;.;~ April 9, 2008 Lauralee Gordley 2010 Jones Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 Subject: Gordley/Denzler Lot Line Adjustment Revised Revision Request LUA07-090, LLA Dear Mrs. Gordley: The City of Renton has completed the secondary review of your proposed lot line adjustment. The following changes are still necessary in order for the City to approve your proposal: I. Note the square footage of land in private access easements. 2. Note the gross and net square footage of existing and revised lots (net reflects the deduction of access easen1ents and cntical areas). 3. Remove all information not requested in the submittal requirement checklist for Lot Line Adjustments unless specifically requested in the enclosed memo. In addition to the above-mentioned comments, please see the enclosed memo requesting changes from the Property Services Division. Once all of the changes have been made; please submit two copies of the revised lot line adjustment to me at the sixth floor counter of City Hall. The revised plans will be routed for final review and you will be notified when it is appropriate to submit the final mylars. If you have any questions regarding your application or the changes requested above, please contact me at (425) 430-7219. Sincerely, '1{o(,letJ1.12£V RJcale Timmons Associate Planner Attachments cc: Christian & Li.sa Denzler/ Owner Project File ------l-0-55_S_o_uth-G-rad_y_W_a_y--R-en-to-n,-W-as-hin_gt_o_n-98-0-57 ______ ~ @ This paper contains 50% recycled material. 30% post consumer AHEAD OF '{HE CURVE ~ ,tY CJ CITY OF RENTON ~.· 14~ ~ ~~ uepartment of Community and ..-::, = ? Denis Law, Mayor Economic Development r~ " Alex Pietsch, Administrator ~'N"\'o,;-------------------------..;.;.;.;;.;.,;,;,;,;;;;;;;.;.;;,;;;,;;;.;.;;;;;;;;.:.;.::.. __ March 26. 2008 Lauralee Gordley 2010 Jones Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 Subject: Gordley/Denzler Lot Line Adjustment LUA07-090, LLA Dear Mrs. Gordley: The City of Renton has completed the secondary review of your proposed lot line adjustment. The following changes are still necessary in order for the City to approve your proposal: I. Note the square footage of land in private access easements. 2. Note the gross and nel square footage of existing and revised lots (net reflects the deduction of access easements and critical areas). 3. A Native Growth Proteehon Easement should be placed over that part of the site encompassing the stream and wetland; and their associated buffer areas. where not cm·ered by the house, walkway, or driveway. Restrictive covenants shall also be placed on the lot to this affect. 4. Remove all information not requested in the submittal requirement checklist for Lot Line Adjustments unless specifically requested in the enclosed memo. ln addition to the above-mentioned comments, please see the enclosed memo requesting changes from the Property Services Division. Once all of the changes have been made; please submit two copies of the revised lot line adjustment to me at the sixth floor counter of City Hall. The revised plans will be routed for final review and you will he notified when it is appropriate to submit the final mylars. If you have any questions regarding your application or the changes requested above, please contact me at ( 425) 430-7219. Sincerely, ' I / ' .· 1· f)G:·,.cJ~.L-t:·; '!-',~ - R0cale Timmons Associate Planner Attachments cc: Christian & Lisa Denzler/ Owner ProJect File ------l-0-55_S_o_ut_h_G-ra_d_y_W_a_y.,..-R-e-n-to-n,-W-as-hin_gt_o~n-9_8_0_57 ______ ~ @ This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM March 19, 2008 Rocale Timmons SonjaJ. Fesser~ Gordleyillenzler Lot Line Adjustment, LUA-07-090-LLA Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced lot line adjustment submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant: None. Information needed for final lot line adjustment approval includes the following: Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA-07-090-LLA and LND-30-0332, respectively, on the drawing. The type size used for the land record number should be smaller than that used for the land use action number. Show two ties to the City of Renton Survey Control Network. The geometry will be checked by the city when the ties have been provided. NOTE: Mon #334 is not a horizontal control monument. Remove the "LOT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION", "LOT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION" and "LOT C LEGAL DESCRIPTION" blocks from Sheet 1 of 2. Said legal descriptions are not needed, and were not reviewed by the city. The correct legal descriptions for the two (not three) lots, after the recording of the lot line adjustment submittal, will be as follows: "Lot A and/or Lot B of City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LUA-07-090, as recorded under King County Recording No. ,, It is suggested that the names of the new lots be something other than "NEW LOT A" and "NEW LOT B". Drop the "NEW" completely, and change the rest to something other than LOT (perhaps PARCEL I and 2). \H:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-30-Lot Line Adjustments\0332\RV0803 l9.doc March 20, 2008 Page 2 Indicate what was set at the new southerly corner common to both "New Lot A" and "New Lot B". Note all easements, covenants and agreements of record on the drawing (Sheet 1 of 2). Item No. 2 under "SURVEYOR'S NOTES" should be removed (Sheet 2 of 2). Note the plat name and tract numbers of the adjoining properties to the east, north, west and south of the subject parcel. On the final lot line adjustment submittal, remove all references to utilities facilities, trees, asphalt and gravel surfaces, rockery, decks, topog lines, retaining walls and other items not directly impacting the subdivision. Do note encroachments, if any. The City of Renton Administrator of Public Works is the only city official who signs this lot line adjustment submittal (note the change in the title). Provide an appropriate approval block and signature line. Pertinent King County approval blocks also need to be noted on the drawing. All vested owner(s) of the subject lot line adjustment need to sign the final lot line adjustment submittal. · Note that if there are easements, restrictive covenants or agreements to others (City of Renton, etc.) as part of this lot line adjustment, they can be recorded concurrently with the lot line adjustment submittal. The lot line adjustment submittal and the associated document(s) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package. References to the associated document(s) are to be noted on the lot line adjustment submittal, with spaces provided for the recording number(s) thereof. If there are new private easements for ingress, egress and utilities shown for the benefit of future owners of the proposed revised lots, then note on the lot line adjustment submittal the following statement: "Area for private_' ingress, egress and utility easement" for each new easement to be created. Since the revised lots created via this lot line adjustment are under common ownership at the time of recording, there can be no new easements established until such time as ownership of the lots is conveyed to others, together with and/or subject to specific easement rights. Add the following Declaration of Covenant language on the face of the subject drawing, ONLY if the previous paragraph applies: DECLARATION OF COVENANT: The owners of the land embraced within this lot line adjustment, in return for the benefit to accrue from this lot line adjustment, by signing hereon covenant and agree to convey the beneficial interest in the new easement(s) shown on this lot line adjustment to any and all future purchasers of the lots, or of any subdivisions thereof This covenant shall run with the land as shown on this lot line adjustment. H:\Filc Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-30-Lot Line Ad_justments\0332\RV080319.doc\cor , March 20, 2008 Page 3 The "New Private Easement for Ingress, Egress and Utilities Maintenance Agreement" statement (noted on Sheet 1 of 2) is also only needed if there are new private casements to be established in the future as a result of the new lot configurations. Is the "WETLAND AREA" to be a NATIVE GROWTH AND PROTECTION EASEMENT area? If so, see the attachment. Have the two utility easements (Rec. Nos. 8805099006 and 8106290604), as shown on the underlying short plat recorded under Rec. No. 9511299005, been formally released; is the notation shown on said short plat not sufficient? If not, then show same on this lot line adjustment submittal. Fee Review Comments: Lots within or affected by the lot line adjustment are subject to the city's special charges, if any. H:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-30 -Lol Line Adjustments\O:B2\RV080319.doc\cor • NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT The Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) on this short plat identifies the required wetland buffer area for the wetlands on adjacent parcels. The creation of the Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land within the easement area. This interest shall be for the purpose of preserving native vegetation for the control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, visual and aural buffering, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The Native Growth Protection Easement imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the Easement area enforceable on behalf of the public by the City of Renton, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the easement area. The vegetation within.the NGPE may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or damaged, without the expressed written permission from the City of Renton, . · The right of entry granted herein shall apply to me agents, representative and employees of the owners or subsequent owners of the underlying property. CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: January 22, 2008 TO: Sonja Fesser, Property Services FROM: Rocale Timmons, Development/Planning, x7289 RECEIVED jAN 2 3 7G08 CITY OF R!cNTO . UT/1.ITY SYSTEM~ SUBJECT: Gordley/ Denzler Lot Line Adjustment, File No. LUA07-090, LLA Attached is the most recent version of the above-referenced lot line adjustment. If all Property Services concerns have been addressed and you are now able to recommend recording of the mylar, please initial this memo below and return to me as soon as possible. However, if you have outstanding concerns or require additional information in order to recommend recording, please let me know. Thank you. Property Services approval: Robert T. Mac Onie, Jr. PLS Date Sonja J. Fesser Date cc: Yellow File H:\Oivision.s\Develop.ser\Oev&plan.ing\PROJECTS\07-090.Jill\Approval Memo 07-090.doc ,, GeoDimensions Inc. 1-425-396-0732 Friday, January 04, 2008 9:23:43 AM PROJECT: GORDLEY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT JOB NO. 6309 CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: LOT A AREA Point Number Bearing Description Distance 9 NB9°29'00 11 E 48 S00°35'32"E 13 S88°16'14 11 W 10 N00°31'00"W 12 S89°29'00"W 8 N00°31'00''W 9 Closing latitude Closing departure Closing bearing Closing distance SRB Total traverse length Total error of closure 255.50 265.34 100.88 197.48 155.00 70.00 Error of closure in latitude Error of closure in departure Area Area ft ft ft ft ft ft Sta 0+00.00 2+55.50 5+20.85 6+21.73 8+19.21 9+74.20 10+44.20 0.00500 -0.00755 S56°28 1 28 11 E 0.00905 Northing 5301. 660 5303.964 5038.638 5035. 594 5233.066 5231.668 5301.665 1044.20 (1044.20) 1/115370 1/208887 1/138394 37672.78 SQ FT 0. 86 ACRES Easting 10027.281 10282. 771 10285. 513 10184.679 10182.898 10027.905 10027.273 JAN 1 1 20ua REC51\'EU GEODIMENSIONS, INC 425-396-7645 Thursday, June 28, 2007 11:23:07 AM PROJECT: GORDLEY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT JOB NO. 6309 CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: LOT B AREA Point Number Bearing Description Distance 48 N89°29 1 00 11 E 17 S00°35 1 32 11 E 18 N88°16 1 14 11 E 16 S00°35 1 32 11 E 15 S8S 0 l6 1 l4 11 W 53 S00°35 1 32 11 E 54 S88°16 1 14 11 W 13 N00°35 1 32 11 W 48 Closing latitude Closing departure Closing bearing Closing distance Total traverse length Total error of closure 125.99 28.63 100.45 100.02 100.45 134. 03 126.02 265.34 Error of closure in latitude Error of closure in departure Area Area ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft Sta 0+00.00 1+25.99 1+54.62 2+55.07 3+55.09 4+55.54 5+89.57 7+15.59 9+80.94 -0.00731 -0.00521 N35°29 1 0l 11 E 0.00898 Northing 5303. 964 5305.100 5276.472 5279.503 5179.489 5176.457 5042.434 5038.631 5303.957 980.93 (980.94) 1/109247 1/134164 1/188204 43309.60 SQ FT 0.99 ACRES Easting 10282.773 10408.758 10409.054 10509.458 10510.492 10410.088 10411. 473 10285.511 10282.768 ,I City ol ton Department of Planning I Building I Pub 'arks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: r., . . i-u s\h':·<:.. COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 4, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA07-090, LLA V DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 20, 2007 Ml.:-=,,.,,, .. APPLICANT: Gordley & Denzler PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dina PROJECT TITLE: Gordley/Denzler Lot Line Adiustment PLAN REVIEW: Kavren Kittrick SITE AREA: 80,982 square feet BUILDING AREA rnross\: N/A ·:::-r·r UF u;: .... ..,_ LOCATION: 2010 Jones Ave NE & 1800 NE 20th Street WORK ORDER NO: 77797 'J 1 'L 11y ~Ys ._ ' ._,'!EMS SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants are requesting a lot line adjustment that would result in changes to two existing lot lines. One would allow the applicant to sell the east portion of their property to their neighbors to the east and south of them and the other would result in the creation of two rectangularly shaped lot and allow for the sale of one lot for the construction of a new single family residence. A category 3 wetland and a class 4 stream have been identified on the subject property. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Liaht!Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Prese,vation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM September 12, 2007 Jill Ding Sonja J. Fesser }Cf Gordley/Denzier Lot Line Adjustment, LUA-07-090-LLA Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced lot line adjustment submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant: This lot line adjustment seeks to create three lots out of only two existing lots; Lot B of City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LUA-95-093, recorded under Rec. No. 9511299005, and the south 134 feet of the west 126 feet of Block 284, C.D. Hillman' s Lake Washington Garden of Eden Div No. 4, as recorded under Volume 11 of Plats, Page 82, records of King County. If the applicants wish to create three lots, then a short plat is required. \H:\File Sys.\LND-Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-30-Lot Line Adjuslments\0332\RV070912.doc CITY ::>F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator \~~ Q :!! '? Kathy Keolker, Mayor ~'N'1'01'---------------------------------- September 14, 2007 Lauralee Gordley 2010 Jones Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 Subject: Gordley/Denzler Lot Line Adjustment LUA07-090, LLA Dear Ms. Gordley: · The City has completed its first review of the submitted lot line adjustment application materials. Based on our review it appears that the proposed lot line adjustment would result in the. creation of a new lot (Lot B), which cannot be accomplished through the lot line adjustment process. A previous lot line adjustment was completed in 1995 (attached), which resulted in the creation of the Gordley property as one lot. A short plat application must be filed in brder to subdivide proposed Lot B from Lot A. · A Jot line adjustment may be approved revising the lot lines between the Gordley and Denzler properties; however a revised lot line adjustment plan would need to be submitted removing the proposal to create Lot 8. Please contact me at (425) 430-7219 if you have any questions. Sincerely, c}JJ 11::12- ~ill K. Ding u Senior Planner cc: Christian & Lisa Denzler I Owner ------,-0-55_S_o-uth_G_rad_· _y_W_a_y--R-. e-n-to'-n-, W-as-hi-ngto-n-98-0-57 _______ ~ ~ This paper contains 50% recvcled material. 30% oost ~nsumer AHEAD OF THE .'cURVE :· Pfl~ ~ 1 d {c .. ,:2 1 p •P • •11 ~ r;;i 1, JJ 71,i. ~ ,I) ~ 0 ' ,; 1 ~r Ii ~ . r-J . I~ ' -~ 1 " ~ 1·, , I " a . n fo "0 o·-' ~ ·o "0 ~ 2 • ( . ,,., i . . .,.. I ·-f-I z _..' ·• ' ·. '. --..'\>< ,..:,)• I I ;, 1_!_.,·""·~<>'$.te,''w "'°'"'• ~ L......L.-"· , ·t ~-~~~--,_l;;.,"' • .,,~ /_:-··r---.:s. , .. n·1u~1~~ ·1 --.::.: Q ... ..,, ~"'-}l!:a.M~""'' 1 • • JI 1-.:,,.......... 1 HT r,..,,;.. &IOC.1.."'I0'-0.,.. "-I co \oo<'l•1l:..,-...~/ -~~ ~;,,;-Tl-\1;,. 'l"OR"l'\O..,. ,:,._[ O ~')(.\..,.,1~i. u,......,."-'C 1-Cl>,,_~l::.l'<\,'1!:.1',11, / I I 1:.:..:\~,.l<.","Pl:.."Mlit,if."T'. -j ~'I!:.~\.. l'l.,Q'O. J ~'11:-~-=e. '°' ~ -~1....t:,1,,,'b~'O 7 ~ \ ••=ss=~ ~ ,.: '\ I J -, T-~'"<· ·i ... "l'\.'\·'51~'...,._A __.....~:..~-'" ~.\ ft" ' .:· __ -~ -l"\.&t.:___. -~_--:-...... ----~~-..~ ~\ ~?•~I I \SJ = - L'E:.C..'I!:.~~: • C."'-?'?''E:."D ~~\.. ~1:,:t> -::..ie:."C 1.... ..... \0'!> ... \. b 1 c,' ,1r,,wo ~1/4 of N.:!==-1/4, $.~ T.~·R . .2...S..:.....'N, _ ... c:._,.,,q,.,,_ .\ I .tr,. Ll.."-~O. -'--~,,._ ·--, ---· ..._ L~,;>---..o-o\'t>Q LAND SUllVl!:YDR's C::D'l'Il'ICATB I HERUY Clll.TirY TKA'J' THIS LDT Llllll iAJ)JUH'l&ZIIT IS L\BBl'.l UPOlf AH AC't'LJ.U. iiURVSY AJIID SUBDIVISION' D1' IQ'(Cllf ,, 'l'OWIISHIP 23 HOR'!'B, RAll'lll: ~ IAST, 111,X,, 1'81r.T TU OOCIRIM! MID DIS'l'AIICM ARB SHOlllf ~y THIR&OXr 'l'IIAT 'l'IQI LOT comtD1 1111.L :as &r.utn> o::rRRSC'l'LY OJI THI WI.OUJID IJlll '!'HAT I NA.VI l'QU.Y COXPLIJtD 11ITII TH! PltO\IISIOIIS or ffll PU/l"!IlfG JUIGUIATIOIIS. ~ ~-"'""''-. I~-" " ,, ~ · '4 i ~\."Um,' Y,....... . ~--~-~0-"''\f\l I ::te~~~~-t ___ .--::-"·· lt.· ·gr· ~/)~ c2, ~ 1"::>S. co' ·. ·'It ' /=· .··· ... ii' -~~,.,,e,.:4-~-~.,,c,::._ 1'CC.---.,-,~,...:."'~•~·~;:;;,~,=-'•",,_-, _·c·a•~I .-.. _ _ .. -·· . ,'ii ·r' . ."·1 __ !',:.;'·-u,·O~'..)~:::~:i°"'L .. N, :p. 1_'_. c·····"_· .,_._··.. . . . ... ,,~UC! J. Q.IJITZ, P.L.S, <J\i \ , , 01;.-~•.-:..:...;..· ~ ,:-· :." . _·.· . ··.... /· C~J'tCAH MO. 10J81 ..... _.-.., .... -I ·. . . . '"4'=--""' 1'i,' 1.lT,;....1T\'-... .' I > ;:p .. ·.• I ·.' ,···01··'· -..-;;.1!,.M.!et,;),"T"!"l'O C..\"T'i · .. 'o • [ ··. · .· . . 9-i:z.·""llt;."'--l-'lo"TO~, ~~'Fl._·.:. Q 8 '• ,:° · .. --~ .. RI\..IG, CCl:'Rl'cC.')."1'!.0\lo:!l<> .-~ .,,.... ·-,i t ·:-01 _: t-.:10. "\S(lCCQciC9~-· L\BIS or UARINGIII I \ -;:_ \ rJ iJi .J("I I.: :_."'° 1 . · .. ·. · .. -· THE ~~GOP-M,00°31'00-V. OK TU KOIIIIJIDl'l'KD CSlfflRLllfB OF I~ ~ .._~:_/ 08 ~ ~.o,oc-5-·.,"?:,"1L-" j if/ ":"° . -. , ~ AV!!,·H-,,£:• --,R,t..,C.1· __ '25)~ ·: ·. , __. • ;, ~, TRf':•1"1· . t~·+·· "'·:.. .. ,_,.,.. . .. 1 '1 I · j -.- . l"'=>J';o~ '=-.. ;Ti . I t-.:,.~''"L"l"oo"'=:... I \ ,-, '""' ' .:·."· .·-' -.· ·-.. •llBl'~C~.1. .-_._._._../ :-:· \S, l'>'lb--,i,.. ...... _ •. ,._tc.. .......... _.J .,. -_ .... '"'""_ ""'-~-.. -··_ .. _..;t:,, ,., I I '-"'l..G.-<;.o ..,......_"" ... "'h'-... ~ .. .-· ... · . ·· · · . ! ;: ·:;;1 I I ~"'l.,.:.~ ------·-·,:-_. _ _i.... -:·_~'. -~~--COONTY.ui.as~•s &\l'--~·5-U-5. 01'\' .-:(.:.-j~ // I ~.ee."'v:.,,.'1",-"~. ····I 3"."xIKOco~-:ASS11_~·s~:HG-U-.5, \V _ : ~~ . _.__ I~ II I \oo.<\o<".o' 2 · · ·--t·c·l'~'!' OP ~(o. _HILUWl•s.z:.u:1 VASHU'G'!'OM OARDltN or EOD r;--"Lc..,,··_·_-_-::..), .'·llD\..D ~ ~..., r _,, .. -·---·. ·.. . . J I ? I ll~. H0,:-.4, v_ 01:,·.11, P.~·::L ·si . i .--~-~·1..'\'00"'1!.·,·.J' I I ~~w '-Ox' ~ .· ¥,cc-.C."'."'1--,,,.,,."-'~~---e~""~·· ",\.co' •.. \, I <..4 o<\'=>, ~ ~"T.1 -(fl :;. :: "t-":). '11,,~?i·~~-· ~ T 7-·"'""'T_._:--~.'-I I IJ,.,.'O~"'-"'""'~= ":11 rl . I '. ·-: ,_:: "' "I · ._-.~0 • ..._,:.;-_77 __ :.-I "J...010 .,)Ot,;),'I!:.~ ...._-...,1-.:>'4~ ~-'=--· q ~ SURVB':t COKOUC'l'Eo :aY 1uw 'l'Ro\VIRSZ IIZTHO!J usn1G 6 sECOXD ·:-x,-· -2 ll_ L.··· • ,., 8 0 1'0TAL STATIDH. I ·r·,\, -·1 ~ \O (:.~"'-""-I 8 Accmu.cY xans OR KXCIIBDS WAC Hl!-UO-O!tO. • .._,_) -·. ,, _._.'-.. ,11r. / ~:';;;:,"":"~~~~C\ o't -, I N~",r,,1 \0 U\\\.St'( e:.l>..'!:;,M'-r..:_ ··1'1o.~<er~, .... ·\,4!'T-l' ~i -·. 'F 7 l"-O"R \ .... 't 'r:i'l!:.l-'::l'e:.1-,T Oi=' \J:>1':\ ,--~~ :,lloll ·: ~-~Ju.,.• 4,"'!:... 1'<..."t.<:... '1-,.::,t:,. 3~91.~~1]...E,,~---:-··.-·=~~"-I~/ '1::?.''"11=1~ .. -:--. ..._.,. I AQ(/IrllR PROTECTION IIO'l'ICB I-------------4 '£"~~~\~~ '---k I i l ·o ·g~ -.1~~~~~ .. ~:)I 11 'i I_ 1..J;..' ,...:.c.. ~.,_'l:>b' _ 1-f I . . ~ "T"""'" ~"I""(. I I:! • !!:.b-...:t'b~ _. . ~ ~:;: 3/· n·1-~ J·:e",....,,~M'l!:.--.:a""'!'."--.;.1'-·~1-· ?.1 -, ~ , g "I "· ... . oP...r ;r O rl1··s 0,/1 •· ' Till: LOTS CREATED HER.ZDI PALI. WtTHIK ZOJIE l! OP Rl!H'l'ON'S AQO'Il'!R PRO'l'ECTIOll ARD. AN'O JI.RS 8UB.ffC'l' TO THlf RBQQIREKBHTS or TH£ CITY or JIDP'!'Oll ORDIJIANC.Z: 14367. THIS CU'Y'S SOLE SOUltCI: or DRIKnl((I ,11.H'ZR IS SIIPPL'ISD FROM A SH.U.I.0,1 ,\QtlinR UllDBR TKII CI~ SURPAC.£. T!IERI: I9 IIO lf,\'l'URAL llAIUUER :Bl'l'WEJ:III TIii: ~'1'1:11: 'l'ABLE A.MD GROUlfD SUJll'AC.E, !:ltTRmU: CARE SHOOLI) al: ,CtllRCI.SSD lllf!II HAN'DLill<J 01' o\lfY LI',IUID SUBSTAIICI OTJIIIR 'l1IAII WATl!R TO :PRO'!'ZCT l'ROK C(lllTACT WITH Tin! GROOlfl) lifJJU'ACS. "' rs '!'JI! otQIBl!S RBSPOIISIBILI't'Y 1'0 PRO'I'SC'!' TIil: CI't'Y'S l)]l~.l(l(l!IO. \l!A_TER, 1 ~ c1 I I : 0 j I .if I . . · I ~~~~ 1 :1! ~ 1~2 Ii '.3i2 I I 81 I.! i 1--. . ·1 1-· ~pvo \P-..X LO""""( '?;,SCaO 11 l~I ,,.._)(.1....0\ "'::)'1.,.00 , .... ')I'. 1....o;::·"!::t.c..C'L·." ;~[~ ; 2>0' ,I ______________ . --"\o.'5o' ' l!jl_;_o_.b_~ ______ L ______ ~L ._.·~""~~~~··,,)' /-' _.:· ··-· .. ,. w JJ71,l. ~' . 'ii 100,'o'o ...l,._'"4.-"........,.'f:.'b ..... Cl'v\'111, .. ,.\',;.~~ •. _,-.· .. --. D l : ; ~ . ;d \'~O<:I:'=' \"\.."''=>:·~"~=-;~.-'"1.-u,,.-..,"i..o<.. . ~ -', 1<e,;:..o+ ·i'l \'-..'.:l.'o.'ci~ ,,_' 14-" ~-N. Co. '2..0'"' """=,\. K~~"T" ~ :-,N-.,,.,;\.'~>o°"i.... "'.'.'- ---, j---· __ "1..t:>(. ~,-,. ~o"J...C .:J t c...-o.1-11LL"-'"'""·~ "-"'"-~ "'""~"'·"''".,-o"' <:,,o,,_~1;111:.."1 o"' <:..t:,ee."'1, 1>,no,i:,01--1 "T<:> ~t.A"'\"T\..'t:. ,u1-.i • ..:.o., ,"Vo\... II, 'P<:>. "e.'l..0 ~ I :c?CCCRDER's crnr-r:cATE .r.J,-/.t-!.Y2,cp,; ~.AND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE GANTZ. LEN -e::·\'...)(. o~ ... ·'Rc...~-40\....)·--'· ... :.·,, ... k ,_.... _ -a-."' \..OT L\\.:::lt A,-.0,.jU~"""I" M.~ ~'""T C ''_'_'_".'-•'••"-· '.'.·.'_•.;l,-.:f_ da_,_,,_ff.~.~-,19f'• .. o!/. µ This n-,1>,p ,::o.--..,_ctly '"P'""en. to a •u~y ma<l• by SURYEYING I ENGINEERHl6 :;_ . · ·. • .. · --... hnoe.11:.~ d.f .. llf.o( 0 elff.tf.ol \~e '"Quut 01 , me or ,,n,:ler "'Y dlrec!lor In conlon-nonc" 111th 1tse N0,_\::.1:-::,.~:_~.;.$_·.b,!:;_t:_ 0 0 ' ~, roqulremen\e of !Mo oJpprop,lo1" State ond Cour,\y 3721 S, 352ND ST. · lf•nA~.( .!..~n(.., S\otul" o~<l O•~co In M!>.'{, 19_<\'5_ P"""· 9T DATE ;." .JOI! NO -~:;{)J ~ AUBURN, IIIA. geoo1 "--·"-· ""'-1<.:-~. 9~~0~ I ~--···(!_a.,,_-?_~'.:f',-.. ,~.~ .. ., 10.;,.e:_1 · l0~-87~·0158 CHl(D~T SCALLI" ",.c,' 91ECT :. >.lyr ~-~\. ol Record, Cu!lflcoto !\lo , ............. .c.,. ---~ ·or. '2... City of Rtnton Department of Planning I Building I Public .. arks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS OUE: SEPTEMBER 4, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA07-090, LLA DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 20, 2007 APPLICANT: Gordie & Denzler PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Din . ' PROJECT TITLE: Gordie /Denzler Lot Line Ad"ustment PLAN REVIEW: Ka ren Kittrick RECEIVED SITE AREA: 80,982 s uare feet BUILDING AREA ross : NIA LOCATION: 2010 Jones Ave NE & 1800 NE 20 1 " Street WORK ORDER NO: 77797 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants are requesting a lot line adjustment that would result in changes to two existing ot lines. One would allow the applicant to sell the east portion of their property to their neighbors to the east and south of them and the other would result in the creation of two rectangularly shaped lot and allow for the sale of one lot for the construction of a new single family residence. A category 3 wetland and a class 4 stream have been identified on the subject property. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housinn Air Aesthetics Water Liaht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transoortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Prese,vation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS \tJ o,-1,J We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Date f j DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM August 21, 2007 Jill Ding, Associate Planner Camille Walls, Lead Fire Inspector Gordley/Denzier Lot Line Adjustment Fire Department Comments: I. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single- family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. 2. A fire mitigation fee of$488.00 is required for all new single-family structures. 3. Fire department access roadways require a minimum 20-foot wide paved roadway. Fire department turnarounds are required for roads over 150 feet in length. The turnaround shall meet the minimum dimensions shown on the attached diagram. 4. All building addresses shall be visible from a public street. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. c:\documents and settings\cwalls\desktop\gordley-denzier lot line adjust.doc City of R~nton Department of Planning I Building I Public , . arks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Fire.. COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 4, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA07-090, LLA DATE CIRCULATED: AUGU "T" r,r, ""'OZ.+ ---. APPLICANT: Gordlev & Denzler PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Di .~ ·. I ;. ' ' 1 ' ' , . Kavren KittriC:I< . I -PROJECT TITLE: Gordlev/Denzler Lot Line Adiustment PLAN REVIEW: ' BUILDING AREA lnrossl: N/A i 11 AIII! ? n ~nm ' SITE AREA: 80,982 sauare feet ! i: :, ' ; : L I . - LOCATION: 2010 Jones Ave NE & 1800 NE 201h Street WORK ORDER NO: 77797 i I I SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants are requesting a lot line adjustment that would resul in change.s"toiw6if*i~tl~~ lat ·1;-;;es. i I One would allow the applicant ta sell the east portion of their property to their neighbors to the e '-· --·· ---· t~CofJhem_~nd:the other would result in the creation of two rectangularly shaped lot and allow for the sale of one lot for the construction of a new sfngleTa~' residence. A category 3 wetland and a class 4 stream have been identified on the subject property. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element at the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major lnformatfon Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Lioht!Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnorration Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Hisloric!Culfural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POL/CY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. t'Sv,,&r tt./aLL-v---' J-µ; /ti 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date + + CIT1 T OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator (J~~Ro~, 1, :! ~ Kathy Kcolker, Mayor ".(i,>Ncr0'Y.'--------------------------- August 20, 2007 Lauralee Gordley 2010 Jones Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 Subject: Gordley/Denzler Lot Line Adjustment LUA07-090, LLA Dear Ms. Gordley: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject . application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. You will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at ( 425) 430-7219 if.you have any questions. Sincerely, . cµJ ':I{: ;J2: ~illK. Ding u Senior Planner cc: Christian & Lisa Denzler/ Owner -------1-05_5_S_o~u-th-G~r-ad_y_W_a_y ___ R_e-nt-on-,-W-a-s-hi-ng_t_on_9_80_5_7 ______ ~ @ This paper contains 50% recycled ma'terial, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT PROPERTY OWNER($) PROJECT INFORMATION CH /I?..( 5 -r I ActJ ; Ll 5 A 1)E (\.)z_LE i<: PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: &,Dt'..-1::>U y / DwJZ-LEX Lt,T uNG ,rJ A P.\i<l">TM T , PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: CITY: {(£hl'n) ~ ZIP: 'i (?b S"j., z», D ._,\O Jv C::-'7 A.. II f; rJ E' J'?l)O zo-rt1 sa-/J E J2 '"'°· I-Th /J q 9, oSl, TELEPHONE NUMBER: LI 2. t;--zz..s--q~ -3, KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): &Di2..DLl?y :33'13C,o-30lo3 APPLICANT (if other than owner) {) cf\J 2. LE)€_ '?~'-tYtO-32-oo NAME: EXISTING LAND USE(S): ~c.,,,J <.¥1 +, J COMPANY (if applicable): PROPOSED LA~):u> Oe: ")( . I ADDRESS: EXIS~foPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: CITY: ZIP: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): TELEPHONE NUMBER EXISTING ZONING: Y<.4- CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): SITE AREA (in square feet): 80Cl9'2.- SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE GOMPANY.(lf appiical5111);, ~ : ' . . . ' DEDICATED: -C+. . , ..• ' ~ ··,-\., , SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: -e- PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ~ '~ CITY:. \ ~ '~ ZIP: q'?t) ~I,,, TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: ACRE (if applicable): l,Q-<;? NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): 3 NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): l Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/planninglmasterapp.doc 07/28/05 ' PRI :CT INFORMATION (contin I) -------------=--'---=--=....:......:.c..cc....~ r--=-=...:...:'-=-==c.:.___.:_L_ __________ ~ • NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLl,-UNITS (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): J/ SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): '3 8 5, SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): ·if SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDI GS (if applicable): /J. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): 'I}- PROJECT VALUE: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): D AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE B'"" AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO D FLOOD HAZARD AREA D GEOLOGIC HAZARD ___ sq.ft ___ sq.ft D HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft D SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. ul"'WETLANDS qf'O j sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal descriotion on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE N£ QUARTER OF SECTION _fi_, TOWNSHIPJ3, RANGE_.i_, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. LbT LI A.) (: A'DJ I) 5'T /vi F7J r 3. 2. 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP Den.=cl~r-q_ t:_r ,-c;-l.1 .__"'-iR. v,:5 '5 ' .. QV\ I, (Pnnt Name/s) __ l~S'~"'-~_'f'lt:..._~•~"""-~~D __ '?._le=r ____ ,, declare that I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property involved in this application or the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein t ined and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. (Signature of Owner/Representati (Signature of Owner/Representative) Q:web/pw/devserv/fcmns/planning/masterapp.doc I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that---------- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument My appointment expires: __ Jd----'"-''"""--"''-"''-'-"'<L--'O"'-"'Ce...,..._2"".= <; 7 I 2 07/28/05 , PF ECT INFORMATION (conti NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): O AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE U AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO o FLOOD HAZARD AREA O GEOLOGIC HAZARD O HABITAT CONSERVATION O SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES O WETLANDS ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach lenal description on separate sheet with the followina information included I SITUATE IN THE QUARTER OF SECTION _,TOWNSHIP_, RANGE_, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. 3. 2. 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I I I I I, (Print Name/s) &c/zaai ?' LaLL.ra. /.e e. (~ov-c/.c(.~-tl~t I am (please check one)~ current owner of the property involved in this application or __ the authorized representative to act for a cdp~ration (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answer~ herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. /~;"'/1' I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence thateic\oAVc\ ~lalJt4YI ~ord le,i.., ,/ , ,/ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free· and voluntary act for the -~ /,.,-z uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. --,..c..£.A:_-,,:L/-=--,t:::=:::..__::_-,t,.~'---- (S Notary Public in and for the State of Washington My'appointment expireu\ il. ~ Zl -ZO l 0 2 08/14/07 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Drainage Report, sl~Kiiiin~;;~it!liit'f !Ilii l:1 1i;;\li1:l\iii!I;:;;;,!ll1Ii1! Environmental Checklist , Neighborhood Detail Map 4 rhis requirement may be waived by: I . Property Services Section ' Public Works Plan Review Section Building Section Development Planning Section PROJECT NAME: (-or:ctl~ Loi-L·ne A~vs/me,v,..+ DATE: 3/ c.,.jO 7 O:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Forms\Pl::inninn\w:ii,u::,mf<.:11hmith1rr. ........ n Ar--·'- 1EVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIRcn/lENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS 'li!l!~il1I;l1ll,lllilljllllll,:!t!1l:Jlllli· t!:lllllf/11 Jfilllilll Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis , J ~ l!IWJ ~&)i.iili!n¥1w,wt~y;1'i!tiirl11¥ ;;;,,: ,: , ;:J,1/1;1 Preapplication Meeting Summary 4 e4~ilirtiI~l~i!tiaijtif1t1i1rr@r1:1;;J11irii11tJ11rn Rehabilitation Plan 4 Stream or Lake Study, Supplemental 4 ~g~f?t1i~H#if!i\!!IP~~l~~lif;!i!!i!!lt!l1ti!Ei@/!@l!li Street Profiles 2 il!li§~#~i~¥1ii&i,~{i#¥i~~~p§~~i'.ii\'.; , Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 1lrffifiiwi8ffil,fi,frrfmi)!fi!l@W ljl/il l l !JRH;lil Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary 4 iii!!I li~i!!t\ij~Jt<lili1i:1i!lifi1i i!Ii'ii!i!ilfii ; Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND 3 Lease Agreement. Draft 2AN0 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND, Map of View Area 2 AND, Photosimulations 2 AND, This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section Gorol/"19 Lor L,'rJe DATE: _ _c3=,/,_,c,,,.__f'-'O"--].,__ ______ _ 4. Development Planning Section Q;\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Fonns\Planninglwaiverofsubmittalreqs_9-06.xls 09/06 July 31, 2007 Lot Line Adjustment Application Project Narative Gordley/Denzler Lot Line Adjustments 2010 Jones Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 ENT PLANNING DEVlgN~~f R[NTOM AUG 1 5 200 7 RECEIVED Lot Line Adjustment to transfer property from Richard & Lauralee Gordley to Christian and Lisa Denzler and another Lot Line Adjustment to divide remaining Gordley property post Gordley/Denzler lot line adjustment. The Gordley wish to reduce the size of their current lot for health and maintenance reasons. Current Gordley site is a single family residence abutting Jones Ave with the most south east property line abutting 20th Ave NE. The property is currently surrounded by six privately owned single family dwelling properties. The most east side of the property has abutts a access easment to the most north east property and an easement to the Gordley property. The property has a drainage ditch running south to north at the east side of the property. The City of Renton Utility easement runs south to north thru both the Gordley and Denzler property at the east side of the Denzler property. The property is an odd T shape. Current Denzler site is a singe! family residence abutting 20th St NE. The property has one neighbor to the east and the Gordley property surrounds on the north and west sides. The property is mowed lawn and trees used for a family backyard. The Gordley primary residence faces Jones Ave. Site area for lot line adjustment is a mostly flat site with a slope at the southwest corner. Soil type is sand and relic agricultural with drainage run off sloped towards the drainage ditch. Lot Line Adjustment to create LOT C per survey includes the Gordley property east of the ditch. The Denzler property line running west to east on north side would be moved to the Gordley property extending the south north property line thru the existing Gordley property to their existing west to east property line. The site boundry is east of the drainage ditch. The use of the properties will be for family residencial use. Lot Line Ajustment to create LOT A & B per survey includes Gordley property west of new lot C and Denzler property. Gordley' s existing lot line for Lot 4 would be moved to extend the south property line to the Denzler property, creating lot A for the Gordley single family residence and Lot B would be a new lot for another building lot. Lot B would face 20th St NE, Renton, Wa 98056. A wetland delination has been done by Stewart & Associates per the City Planning department request as the previous wetland delination report had been rejected. A category III wetland was then identified in the northeast portion of the property in lots A&B .. No code modification is being requested in this lot line adjustment process. DENSITY WORKSHEET City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 1. Gross area of property: 1. SD C/8 ·z._ square feet 2. Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. These include: Public streets•• Private access easements** Critical Areas* Total excluded area: 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1 for net area: 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage: 5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned: 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: -B-square feet l COG square feet ( Q (o(pC/ square feet 2. I l f.o(p c; square feet 3. (oC/ 3 i 3 square feet 4. acres ------ 5. 3 units/lots --~--- 6. l . ?i = dwelling units/acre *Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulatior.s including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways." Critical areas buffers are not deducted/excluded. ** Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded. Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Fonns\Planning\density.doc ~t updated: l l/08/2004 i ' I i ~ ·--.-en <lJ --c:: -·-o --~ 1 NE !2lh SL ~--~~r:1 1,-s:\___ _ __ --~--~l ~-:~~j __ R-B E4 · 8 T23N R5E E 1/2 ZONING <lJ > -< ~ T23N R5E E l/2 ------------------------------------- ,t''"' i. , GEODIMENSIONS, INC 425-396-7645 Thursday, June 28, 2007 10:40:46 AM PROJECT: GORDLEY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values sho'if.lil are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: LOT A AREA Point Number Bearing Description Distance 9 N89°29'00"E 46 S00°26'21 11 E 43 S89°29'00 11 W 8 N00°31 1 00 11 W 9 Closing latitude Closing departure Closing bearing Closing distance SRB SRB Total traverse length Total error of closure 256.18 70.00 256.09 70.00 Error of closure in latitude Error of closure in departure Area Area ft ft ft ft Sta 0+00.00 2+56.18 3+26.18 5+82.27 6+52.27 0.00002 -0.00468 S89°44 '00 11 E 0.00468 Northing 5301.660 5303.970 5233.972 5231.663 5301.660 652.27 (652.27) 1/139239 1/29926995 1/139240 17929.52 SQ FT 0. 41 ACRES Easting 10027.281 10283.451 10283.987 10027.907 10027.276 , GEODIMENSIONS, INC 425-396-7645 Thursday, June 28, 2007 11:25:26 AM PROJECT: GORDLEY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT JOB NO. 6309 CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: LOT B AREA Point Number Description 12 N89°29 1 00 11 E 45 S00°35'32 11 E 13 888°16 1 14 11 W 10 N00°31'00 11 W 12 Closing latitude Closing departure Closing bearing Closing distance SRB SRB Total traverse length Total error of closure 100.60 195.34 100.88 197.48 Error of closure in latitude Error of closure in departure Area Area ft ft ft ft Sta 0+00.00 1+00.60 2+95.94 3+96.82 5+94.30 0.00501 0.00015 S01°40 1 38 11 W 0.00501 Northing 5233.061 5233.968 5038.638 5035. 594 5233.066 594.30 (594.30) 1/118634 1/118685 1/4053193 19784.36 SQ FT 0.45 ACRES Easting 10182.901 10283.497 10285.516 10184.682 10182.901 GEODIMENSIONS, INC 425-396-7645 Thursday, June 28, 2007 11:23:07 AM PROJECT: GORDLEY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT JOB NO. 6309 CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: LOT C AREA Point Number Bearing Description Distance 48 N89°29 1 00 11 E 17 S00°35 1 32 11 E 18 N88°16 1 14 11 E 16 S00°35 1 32 11 E 15 888°16 1 14 11 W 53 S00°35 1 32 11 E 54 S88°16 1 14 11 W 13 N00°35 1 32 11 W 48 Closing latitude Closing departure Closing bearing Closing distance Total traverse length Total error of closure 125.99 28.63 100.45 100.02 100.45 134. 03 126.02 265.34 Error of closure in latitude Error of closure in departure Area Area ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft Sta 0+00.00 1+25.99 1+54.62 2+55.07 3+55.09 4+55.54 5+89.57 7+15.59 9+80.94 -0.00731 -0.00521 N35°29'01 11 E 0.00898 Northing 5303.964 5305.100 5276.472 5279.503 5179.489 5176.457 5042.434 5038.631 5303.957 980.93 (980.94) 1/109247 1/134164 1/188204 43309.60 SQ FT 0.99 ACRES Easting 10282.773 10408.758 10409.054 10509.458 10510.492 10410.088 10411.473 10285. 511 10282.768 GEODIMENSIONS, INC 425-396-7645 Thursday, June 28, 2007 11:14:59 AM PROJECT: GORDLEY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: PARENT LOT AREA Point Number Bearing Description Distance 13 S88°16'14"W 10 N00°31'00 11 W 12 SRB 100.88 ft 197.48 ft S89°29'00''W 155.00 ft 8 N00°3l 1 D0 11 W 9 N89°29 1 00 11 E 11 N89°29 1 00 11 E 17 S00°35 1 32 11 E 18 N88°16 1 14 11 E 16 S00°35 1 32 11 E 15 S88°16 1 14 11 W 53 S00°35 1 32 11 E 54 S88°16'14 11 W 13 Closing latitude Closing departure Closing bearing Closing distance Total traverse length Total error of closure 70.00 ft 155.00 ft 226.50 ft 28.63 ft 100.45 ft 100.02 ft 100.45 ft 134 .03 ft 126.02 ft Error of closure in latitude Error of closure in departure Area Area Sta 0+00.00 1+00.88 2+98.36 4+53.35 5+23.35 6+78.35 9+04.85 9+33.48 10+33.93 11+33.95 12+34.39 13+68. 42 14+94.45 -0.00222 -0.00276 N51°08 1 03 11 E 0.00354 Northing 5038.634 5035.590 5233.062 5231.664 5301. 661 5303.059 5305.101 5276.473 5279.505 5179.490 5176.458 5042.435 5038.632 1494.46 (1494.45) 1/421972 1/672465 1/541951 80982.39 SQ FT 1.86 ACRES Easting 10285.516 10184.682 10182.901 10027.907 10027.276 10182.270 10408.761 10409.057 10509.461 10510.495 10410.090 10411.476 10285. 513 Ste'\vard and Assodatcs 120 Avenue A, Suite D Snohomish, Washington 98290 Tel (360) 862-1255 / Fax (360) 563-0393 ~~·_\','_~', _._;'i!(,:_,',._;l _~~j_,_l_ll_f_l_;!_S.f.~!~_i_,g_(:~_,(()_1_"!1_ City of Renton Critical Area Study For Gordley Property Parcel Number: 3343903563 Prepared For: Richard and Lauralee Gordley 2010 Jones Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Prepared By: Steward and Associates 120 Avenue A, Suite D Snohomish, WA 98290 (360) 862-1255 April 17, 2007 ' (8,: AUG I 5 2007 RECEIVED Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................ ii Disclaimer .............................................................................................................................................. iii Acronyms .............................................................................................................................................. iv Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. v l Introduction ................................................................................................................................... I 2 Critical Area Study Methodology ........................................................................................... 2 2.1 Wetland Identification ....................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Vegetation ............................................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Soils ............................................................................................................................................. 4 2.4 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................ 4 2.5 Wetland and Stream Classification and Ratings ........................................................ 5 3 Site Description ............................................................................................................................. 5 4 Results .............................................................................................................................................. 7 4.1 Wetland & Stream Classification ..................................................................................... 7 4. I. I Cowardin Classification of Wetland .......................................................................... 7 4.1.2 City of Renton Classification ........................................................................................ 7 4.2 Wetland & Upland Description ........................................................................................ 7 4.2. l Vegetation .................................................................................................................... 8 4.2.2 Soils ................................................................................................................................... 8 4.2.3 Hydrology ....................................................................................................................... 9 4.2.4 Wetland Determination ............................................................................................. 9 4.2.5 Jurisdictional Determination ..................................................................................... 9 4.2.6 Wetland Buffers ............................................................................................................ 9 5 Wetland Functions and Values ............................................................................................. 10 5.1 Water Quality ...................................................................................................................... 10 5.2 Water Storage .................................................................................................................... 10 5.3 Fish and Wildlife Habitat .................................................................................................. 11 5.4 Recreation and Aesthetic Value .................................................................................. 11 6 Proposed Action and Subsequent Impact.. ...................................................................... 12 7 Mitigation Plan ............................................................................................................................ 12 8 References .................................................................................................................................. 13 Appendix A. Supplemental figures ............................................................................................. 15 Appendix B. List of common and scientific plant names identified onsite ...................... 18 Appendix C. Data sheets ............................................................................................................... 19 Appendix D. Site photographs ...................................................................................................... 20 ii Disclaimer Steward and Associates prepared this report for use by Rick and Lauralee Gordley. The results and conclusions of this report represent the professional opinion of Steward and Associates. They are based in part upon (a) site reconnaissance and testing, (b) information provided by the property owner, and (c) examination of public domain information concerning the proposed site. Work performed conforms to accepted standards in the field of jurisdictional delineation using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987) and the Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual (Ecology 1997). However, final determination of jurisdictional wetland boundaries pertinent to Clean Water Act Section 404 is the responsibility of the Seattle District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and/or Region 9, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle, Washington. Various agencies of the State of Washington may require review of the final site development plans that could potentially affect zoning, water quality, and/or habitat functions of lands in question. Thus, the findings and conclusions contained in this report should be reviewed by appropriate regulatory agencies prior to any detailed site planning and/or construction activities. Signed: 1e0~0~iltr Hc!to~,,_, Date: April 1'"i'-, 20._0?- Jenniter Holton Ecologist Steward and Associates Signed: '/(/1/11/(n';,1,1 Date: ( lpnl LZ J:'(J(J,7 Jennifer East Field Biologist Steward and Associates iii Acronyms CASP Critical Areas Site Plan Corps U.S. Army Corps of Engineers DNR Department of Natural Resources Ecology Washington Department of Ecology NGPA Native Growth Protection Area NRCS National Resource Conservation Service NWI National Wetland Inventory OHWM Ordinary High Water Mark RDF Redoximorphic Features RMC Renton Municipal Code USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service iv Executive Summary On March 20 and April 12, 2007, Steward and Associates researchers performed a Critical Area Study for Rick and Lauralee Gordley on an a I .47-acre property located at 2010 Jones Ave NE (Tax ID: 3343903563 (see Figure I)). The onsite property consists of a single family residence, greenhouse, and expansive lawn extending southeast across the lower portion of the property, Further south, the property is largely covered with relic fill material from previous land owners, gravels, and concrete associated with a driveway and parking area. The area of study for the purposes of this report is the portion of the parcel that lies west of the seasonal drainage, Critical areas identified on the parcel include a jurisdictional category Ill wetland that spreads across the Gordley family backyard where it eventually meets up with a type-4 unnamed seasonal drainage/stream: it is likely that the wetland continues into the adjacent parcel to the east, but would need to be confirmed with appropriate data plots prior to making that determination. The drainage/stream flows along the new eastern boundany of the property, The onsite portion of the wetland is approximately 0.29-acres in size. Table 1. Summan, of re• ulated critical areas oer RMC 4-3-050 Category or Type per Buffer per Area Onslte/ Critical Area RMC 4-3-050 M l ,a & RMC 4-3-050 M 6,a & Length RMC 4-3-050 L l ,a RMC 4-3-050 L 5,a-c (acres/linear fl) Non-isolated wetland Ill 25-feet (0,59-acres total onsite) -0.29-acres Seasonal IV 25 to 35-feet -264-linear ft _clrainage/stream The property owner indicated that the neighbors to the southwest recently altered the center section of the property while attempting to remedy a drainage issue associated with an offsite artificial, lined pond, As a result, much of the center section of the Gordley property appeared significantly disturbed and vegetation is just beginning to return to the area. In addition, the soils reviewed in lower portion of his property appeared to be heavily saturated, likely a result of recent rainfall and continued overflow from the offsite pond. After the drainage issue with the adjacent neighbor was resolved, project staff revisited the property three weeks after the initial visit to review the soils and hydrology to confirm the likelihood that the area meets the three wetland parameters as defined by the Corps and Ecology (Corps 1987 and Ecology 1997). Upon review of site conditions, staff determined that the onsite disturbed area meets the three wetland parameters: additionally, the onsite wetland is connected by a water of the state (seasonal drainage) and as such is likely a jurisdictional wetland. Upon review of the critical areas study, the applicant plans to evaluate how much of their property is available for future development, At this time the applicant does not have specific plans to develop the property, but may opt to complete a lot line adjustment or short plat in the future. V 1 Introduction On March 20 and April 12, 2007, Steward and Associates conducted a critical area study on an approximately 1.47-acre parcel owned by Rick and Lauralee Gordley at 2010 Jones Ave NE within the City of Renton (Section 5, Township 23N, Range SE; Figure I). On March 20, the weather was cloudy and drizzling and had a high of 50°F. Weather on the previous day included a significant rainfall event with an estimated one inch of precipitation (Weather Channel Interactive 2007). Steward and Associates revisited the site a second time on April 12 to confirm initial findings; the weather on the April site inspection was cloudy with a high of 53°F. No significant rainfall had occurred in the three days preceding the visit. Project staff performed the critical area study pursuant to the requirements outlined in the City of Renton Municipal Code RMC 14.30.050 M (the applicants hired a second professional to evaluate the onsite stream conditions). -0 lurlen 0 Ii> '"' ....... -···' ,' ¢ Medma Q NW,,port Hills 0 0 - Fai <> l t f i! • # ~ I ~ll$t SI ~ ~ ~ 11': 2f.llh St f Ho! t';ltt! ti Wiit'ecoess \lillaaa 0 )!-r rs2DDm ,JJ S ,..__ 96DD ft 1 C2007Map~utlnc \\ C200?N"-VlEQ Flgurel. Vicinity map of Gordley property located along Jones Avenue NE, Renton, Washington. The Gordleys seek to investigate how much of their property is available for development (see Figure 2). At this time, no development is planned. however, In the future, the family may want to subdivide their property into at least two parcels and put them up for sale. , I .. ' ; ·· .. -... ·~ ,, .. ~~~~~~~ .. "'~.,.,,.~~-:«,~ ._4ASJU"""• ~-,,~~•,," -.~'""-'-~":::--""""'::.7·· ,Cl~~mg~~ -~-~--,1;1,~L.\a111mp~uJ ,,~:~,~'; < ~;~.<~:·.~c~-j~; ~~·~:~~-~-~~~~'.!'r,:R~5;)~ ---· : .... } . fii'ii1, Figure 2. Gordley property along Jones Ave NE and 20 1h Street NE showing area of study in green. Aerial photo provided by King County. Information in this report may be used to facilitate project planning and to support necessary local, state and federal permits. Wetlands and wetland boundaries, as discussed and shown. hove not been confirmed by regulating agencies such as the City of Renton. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), or Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology). 2 Critical Area Study Methodology 2. 1 Wetland Identification As wetlands exist within I 00-feet of the proposed/existing impact area, project staff performed a wetland delineation consistent with the requirements listed in RMC 4-3-050 M 3.o.i. Delineations were conducted using the Routine Determinations methodology as described in Port IV, Section D of the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (Corps 1987) and the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Ecology 1997). Routine Determinations "involve simple, rapidly applied methods that result in sufficient qualitative data for making a determination" (Ecology 1997). To determine if jurisidictionol wetlands are present, as defined by the Corps (Corps 1987), the team recorded observations of vegetation, soils, and hydrology throughout the site. Onsite inspections documented the presence of required wetland characteristics: hydrophytic vegetation, wetland hydrology, and hydric soils; project staff mopped the corresponding areas as wetlands. Areas lacking indicators for one or more of these three parameters were mopped as non-wetland (upland). Wetland delineation data collected at locations that are representative of typical wetland or upland conditions on the site are provided in Appendix C. Once staff completed collecting data, wetland boundaries delineated with sequentially numbered pink flagging in the order in which the team encountered them in the field; flags do not reflect geographic location. 2 After project staff completed the flagging process, they determined the geospatial extent of the wetland in the field using a Trimble GeoXT GPS to confirm the approximate locations of the eastern edge of the wetland in proximity to the proposed development. As shown in Figure 3. the team delineated one wetland in the center of the parcel. 2.2 Vegetation To characterize and evaluate the vegetation within the target study area, project staff initially identified which species dominated the different vegetation strata (emergent. scrub shrub, or forested). The Ecology manual describes dominant species as "those that contribute more to the character of a plant community than the other species present, as estimated or measured in terms of some ecological parameter or parameters" (Ecology 1997). To identify dominant species, project staff utilized a combined methodology from Recognizing Wetlands (Bigley et al 2000) and the 1989 Federal Manual for Wetland Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands (FICWD 1989). For each soil data plot, staff estimated the percent canopy cover of each species and then following the methodology outlined, ranked the species in order of abundance. Dominant species are identified as any species with greater than 20% cover. Next, the team evaluated the dominant plants and their wetland indicator status to determine if the onsite vegetation appeared adapted to wetlands conditions (hydrophytic). Hydrophytic vegetation is defined as the total quantity of macrophytic plant life that occurs in areas where the frequency and duration of inundation or soil saturation produces permanently or periodically saturated soils of sufficient duration to exert a controlling influence on the plant species present. To meet the hydrophytic vegetation criterion specified by the Corps, more than 50% of the dominant plants must be Facultative, Facultative Wetland, or Obligate based on the wetland indicator category assigned to each of the plant species by the U.S. Department of Fish and Wildlife (USFWS) (Reed 1997) (Table 2). Scientific and common plant names follow currently accepted nomenclature. Most names are consistent with Flora of the Pacific Northwest (Hitchcock and Cronquist 1973) and the PLANTS database (USDA 1996). During the field investigation, staff observed and recorded the dominant plant species on data sheets for each data plot (see Appendix B for complete list of vegetation identified onsite, see Appendix C for datasheets). Table 2. Definitions of Wetland lndicafor Category Used to Determine the Presence of Hydrophytic Veaefafion (Reed 19971 Category Symbol Definition Cl) .... Plants that almost always [>99% of the time) occur in z Obligate Wetland <( OBL wetlands, but which may rarely [<I% of the time) occur in ~ Plants A. non-wetlands. 0 z Facultative Plants that often [67-99% of the time) occur in wetlands, but <( FACW ~ Wetland Plants sometimes [ 1-33% of the time) occur in non-wetlands. ,-w ~ Plants with a similar likelihood [33-67% of the time) of Facultative Plants FAC occurring in both wetlands and non-wetlands. 0 Facultative Upland FACU Plants that sometimes [1-33% of the time) occur in wetlands •Z Plants but occur more often [67-99% of the time) in non-wetlands. z <( Plants that rarely [<1% of the time) occur in wetlands. and o~ Upland Plants, UPL, z:.. ~ Not Listed NL almost always [>99% of the time) occur in non-wetlands [upland areas). 3 2.3 Soils Generally an area must have hydric (wetland) soils to be a wetland. Hydric soils are defined as those that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding of sufficient duration within the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper layers. Biological activities within the saturated soil result in reduced oxygen concentrations and organisms turn to anaerobic processes for metabolism. Over time, anaerobic biological processes result in soil color patterns, which are used as indicators of hydric soil. Typically, low chroma colors are formed in the soil matrix, and mottles of bright color form within the matrix. Other important indicators of hydric soils include accumulations or organic matter in the surface, odors of reduced sulfur, and staining by organic matter in the subsurface. To determine if the research sites contain hydric soils, project staff initially reviewed the National Soil Conservation Services (NRCS) soil data for the targeted study area. To verify the NRCS data, staff excavated a series of test pits to a minimum depth of 12-18" to observe soil profiles, colors, textures, and other characteristics of the matrix as outlined below. Project staff utilized Munsell color charts to describe colors (Greylag MacBeth 1994). Soils in which the following indicators are present meet criteria to be considered a hydric soil. although low chroma soils and the presence of redoximorphic features represent the strongest indicators (Ecology 1997): • Presence of organic soils or histosols typically formed as a result of hydrologic inundation for greater than 30-consecutive days. Organic matter should comprise a minimum of 20- 30% of the soil matrix to be described as a histosol (Ecology 1997) • Soil matrix with a chroma of one (chroma is the last number referenced in a Munsell soil color description) as this suggests a possible mineral soil that is saturated or inundated for a sufficient period of time resulting in anaerobic conditions. Soils with a matrix of two can be considered hydric only if redoximorphic features are present (Ecology 1997). • Redoximorphic features within the matrix form when seasonally saturated wetlands experience fluctuating water levels that trap air bubbles within the matrix. Air pockets within the matrix allow features within the soil to oxidize forming rust or black colored redoximorphic features (streaks, nodules, or patches). • Other hydric indicators such as hydrogen sulfide odor, iron or manganese concretions. histic epipedons, aquic or peraquic moisture regimes, and presence of soils listed as hydric soils on the N RCS soil survey. 2.4 Hydrology An area is considered to have wetland hydrology when soils are ponded or saturated for at least 12.5% of the growing season. In cases with strong evidence of the presence of hydric soils and hydrophilic plant communities, saturation or ponding for 5% of the growing season (or approximately 14-days in the Puget Sound Area) will satisfy the hydrology criteria (Ecology 1997). Project staff examined areas for evidence of wetland hydrology using the following indicators identified by the Corps as a guide. Primary Indicators: • Surface inundation • Saturated soils Secondary indicators: • Shallow groundwater tables • Drainage patterns within the wetlands 4 • Visual cues such as drift lines. sediment deposits, watermarks on vegetation, water- stained leaves, scour marks on the landscape surface, and oxidized root channels. • NRCS soil survey data identifies hydric soils within the area of study It is also critical to consider seasonal conditions and recent weather patterns when evaluating the criteria above as it may influence results. Heavy down-pours could give a false positive when observing the hydrology present at the site. 2.5 Wetland and Stream Classification and Ratings Wetlands identified in the project area were classified according to the USFWS classification system (Cowardin et al. 1979), The team rated the wetlands using the system specified by the City of Renton Municipal Code (RMC 4-3-050 M la). Buffer widths assigned to the wetland reflect requirements specified by the City of Renton Municipal Code (4-3-050 M 6). 3 Site Description The subject property forms a "T-shape" along Jones Avenue Northeast and 20 1h Street Northeast. (Figure l & 2); the area of study is parcel 3343903563. At the request of the property owner, project staff evaluated only the area on the west side of the seasonal drainage as they planned to sell the remaining eastern portion to a neighboring property owner (Figure 2). Current land use consists of a single-residential home with associated outbuildings and an open, mowed, grassy field that extends to the south and east (Figure 2). Historically, previous landowners farmed the subject property until the 1950s when it was converted into residential use. While onsite, project staff identified broken drain tiles and soils typically found in agricultural areas ( l OYR 2/1 I providing further evidence of the relic land use. Previous landowners also imported fill onto the property in the form of bricks, soils, gravels, and other trash materials. Fill was concentrated on the lower portion of the property that is currently used as a yard, parking area, and driveway. The current landowner graded the fill and seeded the yard to establish a grass lawn adjacent to the seasonal drainage. The Gordleys converted the flat grassy section of the yard closest to the drainage into a soccer field for use by their family. Adjacent to the field is a relic peacock cage surrounded by fill piles left by previous land owners that consist of bricks, chunks of cement, broken drain tiles, and other materials. Remnants of a cement driveway and parking area typify conditions found on the southern portion of the parcel. Bisecting the property is a seasonal drainage ditch that flows to the north. Surface water from surrounding impervious surfaces, drainage from a blueberry farm to the south, and flow from a neighbors' filled pond fill the ditch dug in the 1950s. Recently, there has been an increase in density of adjacent housing developments leading to the expansion of impervious surfaces in the surrounding landscape; this alteration likely increases the amount of storm water moving into the Gordley and neighboring adjacent properties. The property owner indicates that they observed evidence of effects of these landscape changes on the eastern portion of the parcel outside of the area of study where water now ponds more regularly and flows down a narrow manmade channel and empties directly into the seasonal drainage. The property owners directly southwest of the area of study filled a lined pond causing additional surface water to seep and flow across the Gordley soccer field. The neighbors attempted to correct the problem two weeks prior to the site visit by digging a long shallow trench across the area of study to connect the pond with the seasonal drainage. This solution did not appear to resolve the issue as much of the subject property appeared to continue to receive significant surface flows. Later, the neighbor reconnected the pond to a pump that 5 historically regulated the volume of water available in the pond; this adjustment appears to have resolved the issue although further evaluation of historic and future onsite hydrology may be necessary to determine if the pump fixed the problem completely. As a result of the work to repair the filled pond surface flows, much of the vegetation on the lower portion of the property was disturbed and covered with gravels and other materials brought in by the neighbor. Vegetation was able to re-establish itself to some extent by our second site visit and is described in greater detail in section 4.2.1. As shown in Figure 3, project staff delineated one wetland in the central portion of the property. 6 Figure 3. GIS map of Gordley property illustrating delineated wetland and associated buffers as identified on April 12, 2007 (aerial photo provided by TerraServer). 4 Results Steward and Associates staff identified one expansive wetland and a seasonal drainage within the study area (Table 3; Figure 3). The wetland continues offsite to the east where it terminates at a new housing development. To the south, project staff observed what is possibly a portion of a Palustrine scrub shrub wetland mapped by the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) (Appendix A; Figure 5): a portion of it appears to be currently used as a blueberry farm. As referenced previously in this document, a small seasonal drainage flows north and eventually meets up with May Creek. Ecology has not mapped this stream likely due to size, seasonality, or age. During flood events the onsite wetland likely drains into the seasonal drainage and eventually meets up with May Creek during flood events. Table 3. Area o wetland an ena1 0 ra naae di thtdl en 1e a e or Id Iii" d Ith G di ev prope Critical Area Area Onsite (sq It)/ Area Onslte Length (fl) Non-isolated wetland -12,632 Unnamed seasonal -264 drainaqe 4.1 Welland & Stream Classification 4.1. 1 Cowardin Classificatian of Wetland (acres) -0.29 NA rly. According to the Cowardin System of wetland classification, as described in Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin 1979), the classification for the delineated wetland is as follows: System: Palustrine Class: Emergent and forested Sub-class: Persistent and broad-leaved deciduous 4.1.2 City of Renton Classification Wetland Project staff rated the approximately 0.29-acre riverine wetland running along the southern and easterly portion of the subject property using the classification system specified in RMC 4-3-050 M I .a. Using this system, the subject wetland is classified as Category Ill as it is characterized by human-related hydrologic alterations, exhibits vegetation alteration, offers low plant species diversity, and does not meet the requirements of a category I or II wetland. Pursuant to RMC 4- 3-050 M 6.a, Category Iii wetlands within the City of Renton typically receive 25-foot protective buffers. 4.2 Wetland & Upland Description The delineated wetland is an approximately 0.29-acre Palustrine, emergent, and forest dominated wetland occurring in a valley starting at NE 20 1h Street, where the drainage emerges onto the property, and continues northward to the parcel boundary. The majority of the wetland is relatively disturbed and is currently being used as a backyard. In the summer, the property owner indicates that the wetland area dries completely and becomes highly compacted. 7 4.2. 1 Vegetation "Facultative" and wetter species dominated the subject wetland vegetation. Within the wetland, emergent species such as creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repen), white clover (Trifolium repens), English/ rib plantain (Plan/ago lanceolata), and typical lawn species such as bentgrass (Agrostis sp.) dominated the landscape, Project staff also observed smaller patches of giant horsetail (Equisetum telmateia), soft rush (Juncus effusus), and reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea). Vegetation creating the forest canopy in the southern part of the property included red alder (A/nus rubra), and black cottonwood (Populus balsamiferaJ. Pacific willow (Salix lucida) and Sitka willow (Sa/ix sitchensis) dotted the understory of the sapling/shrub stratum. The cottonwood appear to be dying back possibly as a result of excessive inputs of surface water, disease, or pesticides associated with the upstream blueberry farm. Typical pasture and lawn species dominated upland areas surrounding the wetlands: patches of red clover /Trifo/ium pratense), common plantain (Plan/ago major), and dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) covered the lawn surrounding the house, Pockets of Himalayan blackberry /Rubus armeniacus), morning glory (lpomoea leptophylla), and fescue /Fesluca sp.) dominated the upland areas located to the south of the soccer field. Given the abundance of upland and facultative upland species observed, the area outside the wetland boundary did not meet the criteria for hydrophytic vegetation. For a complete list of vegetation identified during field visit see Appendix B. 4.2.2 Soils The Soi/ Survey of King County Area, Washington (National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) 1973) maps the soils underlying the subject property as Indianola loamy fine sand, 4- 15 percent slopes with inclusions of Shalcar muck (Appendix A: Figure 4). The Indianola series consists of somewhat excessively drained soils formed under conifers in sandy, recessional, stratified glacial drift (NRCS 1973). In the upper 30-inches of a representative profile, soils are grayish-brown, dark yellowish-brown, and light olive brown loamy fine sand. Permeability is rapid with an effective rooting depth is approximately 60 inches or more. Available water capacity is moderate and runoff is slow to medium (NRCS 1973). Typically, Shalcar muck appears as very poorly drained organic soils: these soils formed in deposits of sedge peat and alluvium in stream valleys and on rolling, glaciated uplands. The mucky layers range in color from black to very dark brown with a combined thickness of 16 to 28 inches. A horizon of loamy sand to silty clay loam mottled with very dark grayish brown, gray, and olive gray features, is typically present. Permeability is moderate in the organic layers and moderate to rapid in the lower part of the profile. A seasonal high water table is present at or near the surface. The available water capacity is high and runoff is ponded. To confirm the NRCS data, the team excavated sample pits and determined that the soil within the wetland area is predominantly either grayish brown or dark-grayish brown sandy silt-loam with a low chroma ( l OYR 3/2, I OYR 3/ l). Subsoils typically appeared dark yellowish-brown with a fine sandy loam texture (2.5Y 3/2). Within the soil matrix, project staff also observed brightly colored redoximorphic features including small iron concretions and oxidized root pores. The color of the soil and the presence of redoximorphic features satisfy the hydric soil criterion for wetlands. Portions of the wetland also had an abundance of fill materials including pieces of broken drain tile, metal fragments from relic trash, and pieces of brick. Further south, the soil texture became increasingly gravelly possibly from the creation of the driveway and parking area. 8 Soils in the adjacent uplands were also reviewed to confirm if they met the soil survey description. The soils observed matched the description appearing dark yellowish brown and grayish brown in color (2.5 Y 3/2 and I OYR4/3). Soils were slightly damp and did exhibit some redoximorphic features in western portions closer to the house. The majority of the redoximorphic features appeared deeper than the required threshold of IQ-inches or beneath the A-horizon, and therefore do not meet the hydric soil criterion (Corps 1987). 4.2.3 Hydrology Project staff observed several obvious primary hydrologic indicators onsite including deeply saturated soils, areas of shallow temporary inundation, and a seasonal drainage. Secondary indicators such as drainage patterns associated with the seasonal stream and the presence of an NRCS mapped hydric inclusions (Shalcar muck) provide further evidence of the presence of wetland hydrology. Project staff observed that soil pits readily filled in with free water 5-10 minutes after excavation in the lower portion of the lawn near the drainage (see Appendix C for specific data). Based on field indicators and information from the Soil Survey of King County Area, Washington (National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) 20070), the subject wetland is inundated or saturated to the surface for more than 12.5 percent of the growing season (for the Renton area the growing season typically starts in April). Upland areas adjacent to the wetlands had no water in the soil pits observed and minimal hydrophytic vegetation. Soils observed appeared fairly dry (some soils reviewed appeared moist likely due to recent rain event) and porous with very few if any redoximorphic features within the top 10-inches of soil or below the A horizon (if at all) leading the project staff to conclude that these were outside the wetland boundary. See data sheets in Appendix C for additional information. 4.2.4 Wetland Determination Project staff delineated the onsite wetlands based on the presence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and hydrology which generally occur where the landscape slopes eastward towards the center of the undeveloped portion of the property. 4.2.5 Jurisdictional Determination As the onsite wetland is hydrologically connected to a water of the U.S. (the onsite seasonal drainage), the critical area may also be regulated by the Corps as a jurisdictional wetland. Locally, the wetland is regulated by the City of Renton's Critical Areas Ordinance (RMC 4-3-050) and review by state and local agencies is advisable prior to any detailed site planning and/or construction activity altering wetlands. 4.2.6 Wetlond Buffers Pursuant to RMC 4-3-050 M.60, Category Ill wetlands within the City of Renton typically receive 25-foot protective buffers. Depending on the design and intensity of the development planned for this property, the wetlands and their respective buffers may or may not be impacted. The onsite buffers are not currently in high quality condition as the majority of the buffer possesses semi-compacted soils, with a large amount of fill present in the matrix; additionally much of the buffer vegetation mowed regularly as it is primarily used as lawn. The remaining buffer to the south is dominated by typical invasive species such as dandelion and Himalayan blackberry. Prior to development on the parcel, property owners may be required to enhance the buffer to ensure that it provides sufficient protection for the adjacent critical areas per RMC 4-3-050 M 6.a. Further details as to the potential impacts associated with any planned physical development activities should be evaluated prior to finalizing the critical areas study. At 9 present, the current property owners do not plan to physically impact the 0.59-acres of onsite buffers and seek adjust property lines or possibly short plat the property. 5 Wetland Functions and Values 5.1 Water Quality Wetlands provide an improvement in water quality function by storing and filtering large amounts of water. The vegetative structure of wetlands slows the flow of water, causing sediments, nutrients (primarily nitrogen and phosphorous), petroleum products, heavy metals, pesticides, and herbicides to settle out of the water column. Located towards the base of a hillside in a long shallow valley, the onsite wetland gently slopes away from the primary residence and lawn along a very low gradient drainage moving to the northeast. The wetland receives inputs of groundwater or surface water from adjacent up-gradient lands and the small seasonal drainage that originates offsite (Figure 3). Shallow depressions scattered across the subject wetland may trap some sediments and pollutants as water moves across the landscape, but these are limited in size and abundance. The lack of dense vegetation within the wetland also inhibits the ability of the system to provide a significant filter that would trap upslope sediments as the water moves them towards the seasonal drainage. The lawn on the very northern part of the wetland is healthy, dense, and likely provides some erosion control function for incoming precipitation, surface water, or groundwater flow: additionally, the grass appears to trap some water moving across the property as is evidenced by the shallow puddles appearing on the lawn. The onsite wetland is physically relatively disturbed both by regular mowing and the neighbors' storm water project, reducing the ability of the wetland to significantly slow the flow of water across the landscape. The onsite wetland possesses excellent opportunity to improve water quality from potential pollutants coming into the wetland as it is surrounded by fairly dense housing development, an active blueberry farm, and unmanaged storm water flows associated with neighboring properties. The valley encapsulating the wetland is lined by some residential structures and roadways that run both east-west (NE 20th Street) and north-south (Jones Road) providing opportunity for the wetland to filter storm water moving across the landscape. In addition, water flowing through the wetland eventually meets up with the seasonal drainage and eventually possibly May Creek: allowing the wetland to filter water entering the drainage should contribute to the overall health of the watershed by improving the quality of water flowing through the system. Future development adjacent to the wetland will increase its opportunity to provide a water quality function for the community given its location in the watershed and surface water connection to the moderately urbanized May Creek. 5.2 Waler Storage Wetlands control storm water flow by attenuating surface water runoff during and after storms and slowly releasing it to groundwater and/or to adjacent water bodies. Research has shown that this function can reduce and desynchronize peak flood crests and flow rates of floods. As the onsite wetland spreads across a fairly large portion of the lower landscape at the base of the slope and receives inputs of groundwater and surface water from adjacent up-gradient lands, its ability to attenuate floods and stream flows is increased. Specifically, inputs of flow entering the seasonal drainage dissipate as they move across the wetland and travel towards the waterway. A few shallow microdepressions scattered across the landscape likely provide minimal live storage function protecting lower elevations from flooding during high flow events associated with the seasonal drainage and urban flooding. Limited dense vegetation other 10 than a well maintained lawn also inhibit the onsite wetland's ability to significantly slow flows of water from upland landscapes moving down the slope towards the seasonal drainage. The water storage function provided by the onsite wetland will not be directly compromised by the subdivision of the property as it will not involve any disturbance to the landscape. Further development on the property may increase the opportunity for the wetland to provide water storage function as it may involve the expansion of upland impervious surfaces and in turn a growth in storm water flowing down the hillside into the system. 5.3 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Species that depend on wetland habitats for reproduction, foraging, roosting, or refuge include waterfowl. amphibians, insects, birds, fish, and mammals. Species abundance and diversity is higher in wetland habitats than in isolated upland areas because they generally provide greater structural and plant diversity, more edge habitat where two or more habitat types are linked, more varied forage. and a predictable water source. The onsite wetland and surrounding uplands contain a fairly limited diversity in vegetative structure, including emergent plants, and forested areas, which have the potential to provide habitat to a variety of wildlife species. Pockets of scrub shrub communities border the edges of the wetland. but do not represent a dominant vegetative strata onsite. Increased structural complexity provided by different vegetation types optimizes potential breeding areas. escape, cover, and food production for the greatest number of species (Hruby et al. 2004). The onsite wetland does contain a moderate array of water regimes, including temporarily inundated and saturated hydroperiods, as well as a seasonally flowing drainage which provide diverse habitats for various species life cycles. Project staff did not observe large-woody debris onsite (outside of piles of firewood), but did observe a few snags within the onsite wetland, which provide excellent wildlife habitat for many bird species. The fish and wildlife habitat function provided by the onsite wetland has been compromised by previous site disturbances on adjacent properties, leading to the fragmentation of important forested wildlife corridors between nearby wetlands and the subject wetland. Specifically, the installation of NE 20 1h Street added an impervious barrier disconnecting the onsite wetland with adjacent wetlands. In addition. the growth of the surrounding offsite residential communities and mismanaged storm water flows from adjacent neighbors may increase the amount of potential pollutants flowing into the wetland. The degraded buffer is not as densely vegetated as the onsite wetland, which may limit its ability to slow the flow of water moving across the landscape and as such, the wetland receive may receive greater inputs of unfiltered storm water than it would if the buffer were more densely vegetated. As the majority of the wetland occurs on private property that is fairly easy to access, it is moderately disturbed by direct human activities. Neighbors apparently trespass on the property to access a narrow easement that runs across the Gordley property. Noise from adjacent roadways and local residents may limit the abundance of wildlife. and given the limited size of the wetland, it is likely that animals are not able to easily move through the wetland without interacting with humans. While onsite, project staff observed stellar jays (Cyanocitta ste//eriJ, American Robins (Turd us migratorius), and winter wren {Troglodytes troglodytes). 5.4 Recreation and Aesthetic Value The onsite wetland occurs on private property and has limited potential to provide a great deal of aesthetic value to those who reside near them (e.g., bird watching) given the limited quality habitat available within the wetland. The majority of the wetland is contained in the northern portion of the property, well away from NE 20 1h Street, where neighboring community members 11 could observe wildlife activity as they pass the property, decreasing the opportunity for the general public to appreciate the recreational and aesthetic value of the property. The aesthetic value provided by the onsite wetland has been significantly altered by anthropogenic influences from previous agricultural use, import of fill materials, and the use of the area as a manicured backyard. Runoff from the adjacent neighboring homes (project staff noted French drains from the corner property directly feeding into the Gordley property) as well as pesticides from the upstream blueberry farrn rnay increase the amount of potential pollutants entering the wetland; this dynamic may limit the amount of wildlife using the property as well as potentially negatively affect any amphibians within the vicinity, especially given the degraded condition of the buffers. Enhancements to the buffer. such as planting, would greatly improve their ability to process pollutants traveling into the wetland and provide additional wildlife habitat as well as aesthetic improvements to the property. Expanding development activities in the area continue to fragment important wildlife corridors between wetlands in the area. The onsite wetland is bisected from adjacent southerly wetlands by the aforementioned roadway, limiting the ability of wildlife to travel between wetlands. To the east, the property is largely undeveloped, but connections to other adjacent wetlands are fairly disturbed by the intrusion of new development projects. If the property owners eventually subdivide the parcels, this will not present any significant impacts to the wetlands ability to provide both a recreational and aesthetic value to the community. If the smaller parcels are developed into new single family residential homes, building activity should be limited to the area outside of the buffer and wetland to avoid and minimize any additional impacts to the aesthetic value of the onsite critical areas. Specific analysis of the impacts associated with future construction should be added to the report once development plans are finalized. 6 Proposed Action and Subsequent Impact The current project proposed by the Gordleys does not involve any physical impact to the area of study and seeks purely to adjust the property boundaries to create at least two smaller lots. After property owner reviews the extent of the wetlands delineated, they plan to potentially redraw the property boundaries and sell the parcels. Future property owners may design a development plan for this property that would involve the construction of single family residential units on the site. Once that is complete, an addendum to the report will need to be added to describe the proposed activities allowed under RMC 4-3-050 C within streams, wetlands, and associated buffers. 7 Mitigation Plan The applicant does not seek to physically impact the properties under review and as such will not need to devise a mitigation strategy at this time. If a development plan is desired, once finalized, a mitigation plan will need to be included as an addendum to this report. 12 8 References Bigley, R. and Hull, S. 2000. Recognizing Wei/ands and Wetland Indicator Plants on Forest Lands in Washington. Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington. Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E.T. La Roe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwaler habitats of the United States. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. Ecology (Washington State Department of Ecology). 1991. Washington State Wei/and Roting System, Western Washington. Publication #91-57. Olympia, Washington. Ecology (Washington State Department of Ecology). 1993. Washington Stole Wei/and Roting System, Western Washington, Second Edition. Publication #93-74. Olympia, Washington. Ecology (Washington State Department of Ecology). 1997. Washington Stale Wei/ands Identification and Delineation Manual. Ecology Publication #96-94. Olympia, Washington. Federal lnteragency Committee for Wetland Delineation (FICWD). 1989. Federal manual for identifying and delineating jurisdictional wetlands. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service. Cooperative Technical Publication. Washington. D.C. Greylag Macbeth Corporation. 1994. Munsell soil color charts. New Windsor, New York. Hitchcock, C. L. and A. Cronquist. 1973. Floro of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press, Seattle. Washington. Hruby, T. 2004. Washington Slate we/land rating system for western Washington -Revised. Washington State Department of Ecology Publication # 04-06-025. Reed, Jr., P. B. 1988. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: national summary (Northwest= Region IX). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D. C. Biological Report 88(24). Reed, Jr., P. B. 1997. Revision of the notional list of plant species that occur in we/lands. U.S. Department of Interior. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington D.C. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture (NRCS). 2007a. Official Soil Series Descriptions [Online WWW/. Available URL: http:.L/soils.usdo.qov /technico//c/assification/osd/index.html. [Accessed 6 April 2007]. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. 2007b. Web Soil Survey /Online WWW/. Available URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/. [Accessed 6 April 2007]. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). 1987. Corps of Engineers Wei/ands Delineation Manual. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Technical Report Y-87-1. Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. 13 U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2007. Plants Database. /Online WWW/. Available URL: http://plonts.usda.gov/index.html. [Accessed 17 April 2007]. U.S. Fish and Wildlife (USFWS). 2007. Wetland Digital Data. [Online WWW]. Available URL: http://wetlandsfws.er.usgs.gov/NWJj. [Accessed 17 April 2007]. Washington Deportment of Ecology (Ecology). 2001. Storm water Management Manual for Western Washington. Lacey, Washington. Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology). 1991 . Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. Ecology Publication 91-57. Olympia, Washington. Weather Channel Interactive, Inc. 2007. Monthly Planner for Renton, Washington. [Online WWW] Available URL: htto://www.weather.com/weather/monthly/USWA0369?month=-l. [Accessed 17 April 2007]. 14 Appendix A. Supplemental figures. Page left blank intentionally. 15 Figure 4 . Soils surro unding Gordley p roperty as m apped by NRCS. (lnC : Indianola series; Sm: Sha lcar muc k) (NRCS 200 7) ·+· ~ --.,-.,,,, -t...-.......... -.... 3C IL SU R'i::Y c =-{ll'J G COU N -Y .A REA , WASH I N3TOI\ Gc«lle) ---=====-----rve:ers 0 I!:· 30 €-0 "N!b ;;ct! s,._ ,"*:f : 1 -:...;mo-_ul C:a:~.n~.h·.·• S :J1_ Sl..n:e:" --F~e: J 4 ':, 90 18 ] 270 3EO 16 Figure 5. Nearby mapped wetlands provided by National Wetlands Inventory (USFWS 2007). ~ <;/ ::'l Ci Gordley 121-'. 1---4~\'V 112-1 l-.!O•,'I '22-1'·!5'A 1 1 ti I I I ' ~ • I I ~ g z ~ i'. 0 z I ~ V\\1~~ji 1 ~~J )n -----------t 1 1 ----li Digital if~------j-----------I i z i ll " ~ 121-' l-<f!:' \V 1,. :.• ! ' ·~· '., =~·:•1':'i·. ~1~i t~t;J~it~i5t l". !''! .. ·~· '.;.··-·.·t·.-~·-'"(\ ':, ,:,: :·1,ssc~·':j"'· \i)i[ f;; !tfil -i~!i ·,·:-:11; .arr;i ti. -:H~ L.2-11-o!.DoY :;:?"~ ?J~~ifi-lil1t{.fJEk"~~r611E,t1lb~Ni~k~"'lt~l'tcx;1Jale. ~ffl31"li · :f Th~ rrup s a _s2r gene1.1!€d si<llr «ti::,tt fror· an l·teme:map;ii'-9 ,its ar.;1,~ tr1,1011Enl I :.; I 'Z!-11-:;.s·A .~ f z Ma.e_ center: 4T 30' 37.3" N. 122~ 11' 40.8"' W ~ Legend CCNUS_-1_:1can •' I iiiiii O...:al ,~11{1~ Jt' lntEl'~'.D lillapft::iads 0..-r ~.old , llt1t-cl';II~ ,·-· 8lilll:,b,gllO'ii\l ~ U:SIIIIQIII"&,' Rca::la .Collin l.1SGS Clue, ln:eI 24K lo-· '8 WH'.lnd Poli'goftl "::": Etrilll,ift~tac P,trolne-~l,o· ~,~,n~ Mnln~ W::tl::a,d --• Em"'E.rt'IMl...,d ~ltwlllr• Fo>~1e,~·-."n" Wo')fl~nd ~-.irP,wd ,, lJ6,o 00>• -;:: R:1-.. r1- Lo-· 48 A".1'11 !able W,3111.and Dna .... ....0.lll Dl-;ill!II .. ..,. ''"' "'HC SD'HNI --Count •~ HHIK Urban Jiree113·]0K a Stat:D11100K Sc;..ith ,!on1eric;11 ·l Sra~: 1 :3,025 17 endix B. List of common and scientific Ian! names identified at subject property. Trees A/nus rubra Po u/us bafsamifera Shrubs Berberis nervosa = Mahonia nervosa Cratae us s . /lex aquifolium = R. rocerus Salix /ucida var. /asiandra = S red alder black cottonwood Cultivated hawthorn Holl red-flowerin currant fasiandra Pacific willow f----------+-- S a fix matsudana Curl Willow Salix sifchensis Sitka willow Sorbus sea u/ina Greene's/ western mountain ash FAC FAC NL FACLJ+• NL NL FACU FACW+ NL FACW FACU Herbs/Grasses ~~----~-------~-------, Cardamine ofi os rma Little Western Bittercress Cirsium arvense Canada thistle Epilobium ciliatum ssp. Watsonii Watson's willow-weed/ :::: E. watsonii willowherb iant horsetail Bedstraw Geum macro h I/um lar e-leaf avens Hedera helix lpomoea eriocarpa Maianthemum dilatafum Pla[J_@Q_o fanceolata broadleaf/ common Planfa o ma·or lantain Pol stichum munitum sword fern Ranuncu!us repens cree m buttercup Rumex s Dock Taraxacum officinale dandelion Trifoiiup_pr;_e_te_ns_e ____ +re_d_cl(!y_er _____ _ white clover Bent rass Festuca arundinacea tall fescue Juncus effuses Phalaris arundinacea rass Poas FAC FACU+ FACW- FACW UPL to FACW+ FACW-• NL NL FAC FAC FACU+ FACU FACW FAC to OBL NL FACU FAC' FAC FAC- FACW FACW NL to FACW 18 Appendix C. Data sheets Page left blank intentionally. 19 DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corns Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Gcvd 1-E>-/ Applicant/owner: ,2_ 1 C k 1 L1).A./r td '(!(' GoYt,if,e j , knV11\-fv ~+c \-\-nv, l ,Jen v11 fer fit/?f lnvestieator(s): Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site'! ' @ no Nev {V~\..I l1>,w1, ls ci1e site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes GJ ls the area a potential Problem Area? yes Explanation of atvnical or oroblem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S ~ shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies 1v1tul1JYrJ VCffiVl H \ 0'1o t=At roc.1_ sp-1-i c:1 C ''7 ,.. 1 0 r.,J l.., t·o FArv.f Ac1 vcs tis r,p. ti <!o'l. f f,;C J ·ft1.,v A-)(O-(\J)YJ offici11l 1 H ?~D"/o NL HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC SD"70 Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Date: ?,· Jc,· c7 County: /<. 1,1~ State: ~VfVJ~·11 "'.'.llfP SIT/R: 5/2'3Nl-s Community ID: T"ft-\ Transect ID: Plot ID: \ Stratum % cover Visual observation of plant species growing in Ph ysio\ogi cal/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged immdatlon/saturation --Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations --Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical Literature Other (exolain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes § Rationale for decision/Remarks: Indicator -----2__ _______K_ Vfttt"-t (..\.Jl OY\ J {)tt,{\-"Df .J_(),,W{I +vi /A.t \ '.', C VVV--£ n -\-l 1._1 ,:e q_J lOv'I' I ':) vv1 CW''t'd . HYDROLQGY Is it the growing season? B no Water Marks: yes ® Sediment Deposits: ycse, on Based on: soil temp (record temp J Drift Lines: yes e'.i Drainage Patterns: yes ~9 IN E-r,, +ii bi'-€. other (explain) Dept. of inundation: ~inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes ('.1,9 Channels <12 in. v~ no Depth to free water in pit: -inches F AC Neutral: yes@ Water-stained Leaves yes ~9 -- Depth to saturated soil: --inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: -- Aerial photo~raohs: '>( Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes @ Rationale for decision/Remarks: \ S'o1 /r> ':>O I \c., VV,OIS-r J-1\c'.--'<?llj dvc tt; pYt VtG1/) l'li°J ~ T' vtu,r1f{, \l. tl,:{'-f'.. CC'YMnal" i-fd cvo r c€/) i} I f t.rf-v-"' t/ VI il.¥ . Vv! ow I vl Ci . J SOILS Map Unit Name (Series & Phase) / n d i c,,,vw i IL j i' OL\.,·I~ ,, f ww '.)'o_,nd Drainage Class E 1'.C"f <~c, I ,.ii' \ "i d vet 1, LC 1..1 !f-/C/;o S\up,t/) Field observations contirm Yes) No ' '--· \vc\VS\tYV-, Taxonom Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, ·concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure 1 etc. profile moist) moist\ (match descrintion) O-l 1 1 Dvl-t -l.tlVv'l'l J ,cl(,l\,\IC'\-v ·--, Yoe\··<, \-\\c'' e, '.2 -r; '{ "'))_, ·1 ~"(e.i.\l4 'F1 \'U I 'S''lv '.'; I \\ I ~tLvi<ll ~p l'tll Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) --Histosol ......lL. Matrix chroma'.". 2 with mottles ___ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions --Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aquic Moisture Regime ___ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Reducing Conditions ....::::::.._ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List 1vir \ v<,1 c· rl/) Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=I) matrix Other ( exolain in remarks) Hydric soils present? l•i> no /v1 td,' '>L ). Vv \ '\-'v, VVJ O \t\"°;;, Rationale for decision/Remarks: Sc; Is \'-£(\.ci I\~} C1V{UV1 c.11) e ~-c V\ 1 c1 I,, Sl\..V\ cl co 11+ent; 6l .1 () f- of (1\-M--1'\. Sc\\ SUYv~,1 S \J(,J OJ 'i'. <c~ \ C, pDsq b\'€. 1 \rll.-\ ch , c I vi ( l vs I C-v\ s. Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present'' yes <lfcl) Hydric soils present? ® no Is the sampling point yes ® Wetland hvdroloQv present? yes <if} within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: Ac~C.'E. v1.:t ·\-D V\ O'\.. .,) e_ ·-)..0 ?{\.. C '€ ':', cff-. 12.-eg n1 cw.e_d ..R fHV 1-1 er,v./ y V(:(111{!1// n,qhf-b (' foY '{' · NOTES: Revised 4/97 Project/Site: C -,i (,e I ,'; GY L, -' DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or orns 'etlan De neation Manual) 1987 C W d Ii -il. ~ •I Applicant/owner: \Z\ L _ ,:, lit.-\)1C'-\'t'( LDf (~ \'f'-/ , I I t(Vi,j·· -JCYIV1 I k '. \ \c: l-\-cn .Jrnv1 Jr v Investigator(s): Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? (yji) ; l\:io,Ml!J ls the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes l(1XYV1 ls the area a potential Problem Area? yes ,119) Exolanation of atvnical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata~ indicate T <== tree; S = shrub; H.,,. herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Stiecies Atwo·,t, s <:;n. H b0°/o f'f\C ; ' T v, fu\, c"r11 l'f ()ens +\ SD'7c FAt 'jPIU\A iAV'lh ti 25'),, ft'\C CY (D,(l:,c-'' '·• ,1,\ y,1eHu lt\Xt\XA CV-Yll dfi11,ir,U j-/ JO'lo NI.-- BYDROPHYrIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC >SC"7c Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Date: 3·20·Ul County: ~-1 {) a . State: \/\J {A q,,\ S:"Q t l),'1 SfT/R: U ·:Jd(\/ / _,,_ Community ID: F'cl'-"1 Transect ID: Plot ID: ']___, Stratum % cover Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adapta1ions areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations --Personal knowledge ofregional plant communities Technical Literature Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ® no Rationale for decision/Remarks: ~N\i!.iA.kl c,1 pcvr\-of J.,N\f'/ v, -1-'h uv\-\ \, (fC\V\{,Kk,\ vYl owed . HYDROLOGY Indicator --___!S,__ _L... Is it the growing season? § no Water Marks: yes (ri"o) Sediment Deposits: yes (iijjl on Ba~d on: ___ soii temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes @ Drainage Patterns: yes (rii;I V'lif-Ts \-t1.lol e other <exolainl Dept. of inundation: --inches Oxidiz.ed Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes ("_<) -- Channels <12 in.Neil no Depth to free water in pit: --inches F AC Neutral: 00 no Water-stained Leaves yes ~~) --Depth to saturated soil: -inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream 1 Lake or gage dat_a: --- , Aerial photographs: Y. Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes lj Rationale for decision/Remarks: Yr \c~ \,'" 's. 1.,.; n h1.. \ l dfJI/S ( U'/1?P O C /-(-cl t; o \ \s \f\Jt>-\\} i V-* l ~ 6. vc \-o f>Y '2 \/ \ U\)-::> '(r\'Y"\ · 'iVl r",,y ; 11 Ci ~ I Map Unit Name (Series & Phase) I V-1c\1 t1.N1 o ill ) ~c 0,w1 '-), hnx scw1d Taxonomy (sub rou ) iy-\L, '7o S\ 0 )'{'/) Profile Description Field observations confirm ma ed e? 5i 1ne Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (m§tch descri11tion) 1 -r2 11 A IO Y '2. :, f'J,. 1,5'('-t J'-i j >; 7 V f 11'1.( S0A0cJcJj ~Mell ti D /l, I 12-11o" B 2 ."jY3})~ 1 s '(4-14· I S'7,, " 3/\ n cl ~/i '1 V{I.Vf) \, ' 11vie 0 J?lfh . i Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) --Histosol ___J;_ Matrix chroma S: 2 with mottles __ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils ~-Aguie Moisture Regime __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Reducing Conditions _;2'._ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List ,,-1(\VS,\ Gleyed or Low-Chroma (= l) matrix Other ( exulain in remarks) Hydric soils present? ~·~ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: ~ \av+ C:rll vva/(d Soi l':i l"\1(; \ ,;;\-f1CfYYI recev11 V{i. 11/rft.A \ \ -YiOt {2,.e C iL-t C kY d Lu fL/ Q -1' Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ii? no (,-.,, Hydric soils present? ye,;) no Is the sampling point yes no , Wetland hydrolol!V present? yes fi\o; within a wetland? ____ ...) Rationale/Remarks: 1/v'<"a.. ;;:10(/J no1 (YU'-t.f-f/1 ree pc /t WA!fCv~ -L-1 (. l . . -. (Let1 v I t,,r /GJ (Yi/TYVtd ?IA10 4/) (l v-e.ov ir ' es11n-1r;1b4 \.Jfi\C (CVe. V - NOTES: Revised 4/97 Project/Site: (b J \ /!01f .. 'C ~ DATA FORM I (Re,•ised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or orps et an e meahon 1987 C W I d O r M anual) Applicant/owner p_ 1 c} i LCLA/Yll. \ h 0(::Vd\f.~ , \fvi ,fj, ~r x H o \ h},,, ' . I-en n 1P-c,· >cv,r Invcstigator(st Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ' @ ' no L-/1, \'\' V\ ls the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes C) Is the area a potential Problem Arca? yes Explanation of at"nical or nroblcm area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; 1-1 = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant SocClcs Stratum '% cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species cwr,, ~11 ,~ H 4:Ylo fAC CY" 1U01UL\ Jl\,v~n . tt>) y.1e.Lw ir J NL. .,,, 'jv\ ncr_ c,o t-\ 3o'7c FACW ' '1vt to\ •\JY'v\..., VP. f',v.1\ S H 1st() FAC ftG\'A.)(ALVYYl Gff1L1VlA le H i\l"lo Nt- HYDROPHYTlC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAr:Y')O"/t Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Date: 3 · J.l.' · til County: /!_ I nCJ State: \/V,1/,I i'n:J f·OYl S/T/R: .Si 2~01\J) .;:, Community ID: PEl'--1 Transect ID: Plot ID: ?:, Stratum % cover Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundationisaturation ~ Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations -----Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical Literature Other (exnlain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no Indicator -- __&__ X Rationale for decision/Remarks: \,'e~·e.-\·l\:htfY> fX, . ..-1· cf . 'r'('~: ()']C,Wfd _ .ftLYJY'\. ~ \tJl\,t(x pc;YlcJed i'S' S(nJ +-·h cf ~,.,. ·'-,, .~ ,c, ,J,a,I,, c/11(' ~" i~,0 ,,,;1f S/-t-Ym -eve,\/\;\-C\h ,;c1·, \s cc~'" flt• ci HYDROLOGY' ,. -' T ls it the growing season? § Water Marks: e .. Sediment Deposits: ycs(u6 no yes ?> 011 Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes ~ Drninagc Patterns: yes (flg V~E~s 1--1, ·,01.· other rexnlainJ Dept. of inundation: ., lnchcs Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes® Channels <12 inivil< /1lo' -Depth to free water in pit: --inches FAC Neutral: '© no Watcr~stained Leaves yes q}_g) Depth to saturated soil: c:;vv.L inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other ( explain): Stream! Lake or gage data: S,cl -\-vY tt+(' cl vpp C v \ )~ ,, --1,1 Aerial photogranbs: 1-Other: Wetland hydrology present? ~ no Rationale for dccisiorURcmarks: .sc,rfo c e.. '( ,({,C'f' v bl\:tfd S, C\ \ :.) :;.,tt:\--\.Y~' c:,.. . .:t--<':. ct jTJ 101:J V-f' C·tnr V"C1'L t Vl -€-./{'Vl I-' cl SOILS Map Unit Name (Series & Phase) I VI d I Cl, l'l O i Cl ,1 f OOh•vvQ ~\ 1U Srt V1 cl . 1r· ,., c .,, < 1 ' e k; Dramage Class . " 't ~ o v , dV(,\ I f'l./C Taxonom 4-1s0·1c Field observations confinn @, No ' \fl \I.: C, \ i)Yv, Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match descri11tion) 0 0·'5 , ·00.ff ----· -- ,, l::i 2 sy :3/:i.. ·, G'r·-q+ 21J'7< . vN. { s(l..vuJ 'J I '.)Vi\Nf I 1,r D·S·lb I Q ~ <;;, \ l· fM1Y1., Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol X Matrix chroma S 2 with mottles --------- -·-_ Histic Epipedon ___ Mg or Fe Concretions Sulfidic Odor High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils --- ···--·--Aquic Moisture Regime ______ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils l vl Ii vS1 C\, \(_. Reducing Conditions _'.'--Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List f--0 Glcyed or Low-Chroma (~I) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? ~ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: \''(" ctl u n•_\ Sci ic, s ci...\v,,. ttA--C cl ·tu -t· W ? L.Ari'u UL -Y-.z> c).o )\. \0.. ,,h) LJ.\olLV\.dO.siA_"X . Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? (: no Hydric soils present? no Is the sampling point & no Wetland hvdrolOQV present? no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: LiL vvn I S iV'IY V\ IYY ',y, tl..( fh.po._ h i <; \1,,v-1 (t\ J / ~ ft\ VYYVC\ _/; 1 /l'f cl (A,/ ~1\s q, c:\..QJov, s .. NOTES: Revised 4/97 DATA FORM I (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual\ Project/Site: Govd k:"J Applicant/owner: {2_ \ C \L i LC\.,v'Ytd.-ff Go-vcJ f,e. ~ lnvcstiirntor(s ): J·e.v, vi 1 \'-c ..-\-1 o \-\-u-v, f J-c n ,1 1 ~-CY-t (V)-j- Do Nonnal Circumstances exist on the site? <Jc.'} no L.-tlVv V\ Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes ~ Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes Exolanation of atvnical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Snecics '"" _ (1>,,f(v i\ 110 i'v) t-\ J-\-C,,07' Ff\C G"Y lq,'.) \Cl\..,\ ~-A'"'" A W<' it<'V , Ni.-tu /u vSS c,p. +-I '3Cf7c FAC1.~ Tv 1f" l i~·1'vt., y,,f)·P;\V) H \Sele ff\C ' Io 'le 111.,v,tJ<,Al v,11 off1l Inn r, r1 NL-- HYDROPHYTJC VEGETATION 11\DICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC/ ';) C, /< Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Date: ?, . ")_()· 0 ·, County: /('__ 1. ntj State: ~V{vH1 1 Y\Cj h)Yl S/T/R: C,) 2:",I\J i SJF: Community ID: PYl'-'i Transect ID: Plot ID: ).~ Stratum % cover Visual observation of plant species growing in X Phys iological/rcproducti vc adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations --Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical Literature Other (cxnlain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no Indicator --· ..1,,_ Y.. -- Rationale fol' decision/Remarks: o{ clcLl,'---Ve q-e Yt'v\-i D,~ Qi\i\( \-o[ Yeij, vv,o-wecl .u1. w V\ 5 Vv {\.\-e v p oY\decl C' ' SL'\Hl.o. \ .o 1\ r1 i-,~ t-I C, .J! I j,,,oi \.i due fo il<P C'f. v1 t· 5 +-<;r' ,lo •e-W'A1J· {IV> '°".:,OIi c. c.o-vv, D/lC-\-ec\. HYDROLOGY j is it the growing :season? ~ 110 Water Marks: yes @) Sediment Deposits: yes 6 OL1 Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes fu9l Drainage Patterns: yes (i19 \ ,\I ~l c.. .\-r, UJ other (explain) Dept. of inundation: _, inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes~ -- Channels <12 in. vcs @ Depth to free water in pit: -· ittchcs FAC Neutral: <2si> no Water-stained Leaves yes~ -- Depth to saturated soil: ,,., :i,f.inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: Sc1.,+u vA:$~ 0ppe.v . 1 l\ /. iv'\ I . Ael'ial ohoto2:raohs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? (& no Rationale for decision/Remarks: ~-;1._, i\"'-(-(1..(t' ' Ci: !JJ...('f' V \o ll-)tJ:i \;) '--i ·veC.b'-.+ V[,l\vl Su; \c, c:;o.jv'< °"\-c:d h) ' .P \ ,<,, \It ..+ . SOILS Map Unit Name (Series & Phase) J 1,,1 ci : 0.,11 o I 11< Q o ttn1y f-1 f$, 5'£1,,V\ cl Drainage Class txcrss;'v'f I q J Field observations confirm & ) e? S DY1'U'.. · n \ Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match descriQtion) ,, \)\)ft' _, D -{) S ---· ' st"-Yl~, 0 ,,,,,v e I l':J 0 'Cy-\1,, \'.) ') 5 '{ ?, /'J.. t ·SY'~/4 ).D'Jo ,o._, 't" /[ Vl'-' Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) ··--Histosol .l Matrix chroma,;; 2 with mottles ~--Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils -- ~-----. Aquic Moisture Regime __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ( . Reducing Conditions _.'.1c_ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List inclvs1c .. Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=l) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? 63s no Rationale for decision/Remarks: ~O I\ S Stt\··v,rL,_}tc\ Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no Hydric soils present? no Is the sampling point f, no Wetland hvdroloov nresent? ' no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: UA. \NV"i IS h.( VY 10 0'( VY\ {l \ · Av--eo, h is \-o-v; at\ t~ ti\., y \')'\J c1 ' h I I 'c' c\ NOTES: Revised 4197 h/) Project/Site: Govd i-f>( \ DAT A FORM l (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Coros Wetland Delineation Manual1 Date: 3; . )Q. 0·7 \.2_ \ C \L LO,A/Yc< I ft Gcrvd \'{.~ County: /y.~ Applicant/owner: ('! (l State: 'v(t ',h '/'J. h:;v, Jnvcstigator(s): . Iv'. n 1.-, i \f V Hol 1-uy, J [' 1-11-. ,.C.y f,1/Jr Sff/R: 5 J SN 5 ·' Do Nmmal Circumstances exist on the site? yes €c.i' Community ID; Is the site significa'.uly/isturbed (at;pical situation)'' @ ~ Transect ID: ).. Isthcarcaapotenuall1oblcmA1ea. A,.,,tt t>r:l llU.vL:r'' ... ) I" w\u.v{ Plot ID: c· l . f . l bl r, . .. \ . "r c ~ po.c ::;, Exp anattono atvntca ornro cm area:_ \)'•Yl0 h~ 1:1vtt ,vi ,...ind. t,"), 1;1ctoz.e~,. VEGETATION (' · ct· 'f' 'ii-',,s "'{'-b ff;;J~ .rif~v"' · · For strata, 111 1catc = ce; = fi 1m ; c1 ; = vmc) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Snecics Stratum % cover Indicator T\.\ ()ico..1 (av, n H (oO''/o Fite cv_ .-. ~ "'ff1'NVJ \v1 1 ,i1v"f'/l, +-I ).D"l o FAC. HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW. & FAC ·'? ::: o '7 v Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in X Physic logical/reproductive adaptations -- areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database _s_ Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities " ---- Technical Literature Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? e, no Rationale for decision/Remarks: V et'j c tr~ il q-r, \"\'1 nrv .f ct tvVl () s pa ' & ,:_, .-b'U I {) h lo (TY a I t-e v-eu .P ti 10 rJn (().p'e TV 0 V a, p .n nv, cl · 'Y VP .. ,.f. 0 / ,;rYl .() v,e/, ,_ HYDROLOGY I J I , ls it the growing season? g no Water Marks: yes (Db Sediment Deposits: yes ei> j on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes 8 f)rainagc Patterns: yes Q!9 \r-/t:-k tn\0\'f'. other (explain) Dept. of inund~tion: -inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes@ -- Channels< 12 in. iTes. no Depth to free water in pit: q" inches fvr:Yvi S U\'f FAC Neutral: ~ no Water-stained Leaves yes fu.O Depth to saturated soil: <., ,vT inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: --I vi v,-, d CN\-ed )I Aerial photographs: )z. Other: S l\c\vYcv\td \jQ\')('..\' I). Wetland hydrology present? @ no Rationale for dccisionJRcmarks: dv·c~\"" f\Veil CC1'n()6CfecJ b~ ivu,t }ti\ Sf/srm cdtvti:Y CYI C<-,J;. 0 v "\-(\•P,yh , . ' ' u SOILS Map Unit Name (Series & Phase) J r1cl i {/.Al) D / tl j .f_ 0!'.LVlvljc Fi YU'. SttvicJ Drainage Class . _EX c.e ss \ ve ~ U V"[J..1 VU'. (' ) 4 -JS'/ C ) h. {/) Field observations confirm ~ No e? ; 1ric\ '" Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure 1 etc. profile moist) moist) (match descrigtion) ,, bvff -o-or; -· ·- ,, ·A ·rs~+i+ SClVLdj s.1 Ir D. i:; AS JOYJ2~)1 p I l/1,\'Y] 4.S·H:i" A (D'(,;.23/ 1 7-SY'-114 L,C\ 1 10'10 ~'l.\;V\d0 <:, 1 1 1- _)); O,..VY\_. v Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Matrix chroma '5 2 with mottles -·-· --__ Histic Epipedon --·-·-Mg or Fe Concretions --Sulfidic Odor ___ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils -··· ... Aquic Moisture Regime ____ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils _J,_ Reducing Conditions __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List __'f,__ Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=l) matrix Other (exolain in remarks) Hydric soils present? <@) no Rationale for decision/Remarks: Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ffes' no Gs Hydric soils present? yes no Is the sampling point no Wetland hvdrolo<>v oresent? yes no witbin a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: "--/ Avr,_o... Afly,1.c-e n.t +o v:.e c-ev,t d ,s,\-\,>Yb°'-Vl C-e, J ~'U 19 h b0 n.'YVtQCI O'\/~Y SO\ IS \v V..J?.Oif.. tt {\ '/ d vcu vici\Oi'€ 1ssve -~\la.;\ev-r.", ~ NOTES: Revised 4/97 DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination oro, e an e neation Manual (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 C W ti d D Ii ) Project/Site: G Ov d \ ,e '1 ' Applicant/owner: f2-i C k A Lc1..,1./Y (."' i e.c Govdk '-/ j {' lnvestigator(s): ' e \/\ V1 \ tc { l\ o \ +1:tv, ( , \ '(' \'1. Vilt(' V [,, .,, Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? i@J no ls the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes e Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes Exolanation of atvnical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species I C\.Y {t )( l\ C V)Yl tfhc11,~ Ee l-1 Jell, I\]\..., fntn Ii l) rYI tfl'.lfA/l H ?icF/o Ff\t ' f't\C c--v T'-IDVo.A i'tllllln t1r/\'i,t ti 4(,ilc we-lie, , UlF d t1111 f •Lt cliqospc r,r ll H i-},o'lc FAt. HYDROPHYTJC VEGETATION JNDlCATORS; % of dominants OBL, F ACW, & F AC > ;)CCfo Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Date: 0)c,-c,} County: k--W,~ , State: \;V t\.(,V I vJ/ fCY\ Sff/R: ,:; /J-3N 15 · Community ID: \?Etv1 Transect ID: Plot ID: to Stratum % cover Visual observation of µlant species growing in x Physiologicalh'eproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations --Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical Literature Other ( exu Iain) Hydrophytic vegetation pre:ient? ~ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: Vec1e. ve l_) V\c1.,v \ j \'Y1GWfd. HYDROLOGY Indicator -----2',;___ _£__ ls it the growing season? § no Water Marks: yes 6· Sediment Deposits: yes (n;l on Based on: soil temp (record temp __ __) Drift Lines: yes ~ Drainage Patterns: yes (nj W £,c. -\-oJ.a \ e other (exnlain) Dept. of inundation: --inches --Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes@ \ ,1 hii\'Y1 SVY~M<L Channels < 12 in. ves tuh Depth to free water in pit: \ mches F AC Neutral: ® nO Water~stained Leaves ye..<; ~j' ~ Depth to saturated soil: <;_,.\)'(\ inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): \()..~' Stream, Lake or gage dat_a: -'-I-Scc\--V-Y ev\c<J 1J?Vtx Aerial photographs: Other: Wetlond hydrology present? YeJ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: S tL fvrcc;/t: c~ -to r, S'i.11 /· n. c *-1 ecY1 c:J i >l CJ f'\t llX b:j SOILS Map Unit Name (Series & Phase) I vtd, c:Ln o \ A-..Q oo.. \'\'i,,~ NVU: ~Ct{1('l Drainage Class f' X Cf~;(, I '< ·f I j cJ V[{/ VL-td Field observations confirm @ 4 -\S"7o SI ,e,0 No l/ . Proffie Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match descrigtion) ,, D·-7" -Dvf F -- 2-e ,, -I I\ iO'f'(2 ?, ) ).., IUYQS/4-2.."lu Ned Stvtr,chJ ,~ 1 I\- 0" , __ '3·\0'( A 10'{'2-, 3 /, --S I \ \-.Q CX\, VY1 WI th ,; rrn,i 11 Vlk;\/P.\ 'b J Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol .J!,___ Matrix chroma ca; 2 with mottles __ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions --Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aguie Moisture Regime __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils 1n lf uric, .....x..._ Reducing Conditions _.:::::.. Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List ¥. Gleyed or Low-Chroma (-l) matrix Other ( exnlain in remarks) Hydric soils present? ~ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: ' S \,t (L,\ C t!v< v\11VC k. ; vi clvc; 1 l'YV> -t,,\i I d.-{_,V\.i d.u fff i Y\ pvof1\-e. Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? s no @ Hydric soils present? yes no Is the sampling point no Wetland hvdroloov present? no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: - h'\e cl:8) pell( o...WU'teVS-. Revised 4/97 Project/Site; G oY ci \ 'f ~ DATA FORi'\11 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual' Date: ?)<Lo-Cil Applicant/owner: r __ \ CY: 't Liw(i~ \ 'E-0 Coc,1d \'f ,j . -County: \c1 v, ') lnvesti2ator(s): Jtv\,\1.1(:Cv -\\ I) \ \-i:.rYI 1 J t' \IC I 1 \ ff V ~ tv?-t State: 'vV CV) Vi 1 ".) <) ·\--OY> Sff/R: _c, i 2-?,N k Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? &.!Y no Community ID: VE-H ls the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes G) Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes Plot ID: -i Exolanation of atvnical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum % cover Indicator ·11\, \r tLl( o. C 0--YY. . o{f111n;1./, -H 0010 I\)\/ Qcv1,-1n so, 1\ :-:) 'O '7 0 Fl'<( UY )\\[)\ (I\,\ 'i\/e\-\1"'{ _, +-I ?0% ff\C v'1 Pivn vr, 1-v Iv s r -e p-c 11_~ HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, F ACW, & FAC ?SU'7c Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations -;::-areas of prolonged inundation/saturation -1__ Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities ~ ---- Technical Literature Other ( exolain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? t9 no Rationale for decision/Remarks; v,h:v~s /2:eqvifl, ij (Yl [5\f'( f cl -N-e i<3 'n \; DV vv-eec\ N--e,u' d \' C\ \ Yl (('] '-f d i~cVl . HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? <§ no Water Marks; yes (~:i,\ Sediment Deposits; yes @ on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes e Drainage Patterns: yes ~91 \N £','s -\-c,l:>1-,,_. other (exnlain) Dept. of inundation: -inches Oxidized Root (li~<s) Local Soil Survey: yes (:'? -- 0" f,01""' ';\)Y \-Channels <12 in. es n.o Depth to free water in pit: I inches F AC Neutral: §~ Water~stained Leaves yes~~) Depth to saturated soil: s\.:n-inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other ~xplain): __ _ _ uppt< 12-'' Stream, Lake or gage dat_a: --(A, -\cJ v-o., 1-e d Aerial photographs: X Other: Wetland hydrology present? 0Y no Rationale for decision/Remarks: \/f,V\..i vve.·\-_ wct-\<c: v ,; (' <{ p fd t Y\ i_ \rl.Jl,, v,._g h. S' I dJ./.J o-,f d Ol fc-"' '1 SOILS Map Unit Name I v1Ci I OJ) U it'A. .· P [i(vl'h ~ (Series & Phase) f \ Vt.t S (1.-n cl \S <·1 o <; \ c ','./J Drainage Class clvCLi U( Taxonom Field observations .confirm_ @ No ma ed e? Iv, (.IV'., , -- .c, ' Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match descri11tioo) 0-\" -Dv~f --- " A (O''{Q..,../, --g I \t-':) t wLQ. I ·· I t'J ''-0_,V\d Hydric Soil Indicators: ( check all that apply) Histosol Matrix chroma $ 2 with mottles --__ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions --Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils \Y'\dvsic v ~ Reducing Conditions ~ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List ,I Gleyed or Low-Chroma (~I) matrix Other ( exnlain in remarks) Hydric soils present? t!}1 no Rationale for decision/Remarks, _.,. f'vf \)( k. i nc/u s1 cYV); fa, r ly SCZ.Vl d '::J Are,t ref fee h v·e of Shtdca.1- Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no ~~ Hydric soils present? no ls the sampling point no Wetland hydrology oresent? e no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: Ave ct c, c!J c,Ce rt.t' /-o ve I, c SfCv)OYl(.d d ((.L,' r10..{J( NOTES: Revised 4/97 DAT A FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corns Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: 0 D"( (J \ 'f_''J Applicant/owner: \1. 1 C. \c.. 'l LC\.;\)Y{l \ tt 00Y cl \ (: 'j Investi "'tor( s ); ,J 't'. Vl \11 j f-c.t J. I O I t-FYI d. Je Vl Vl i tf I' { a,o r Do Nonnal Circumstances exist on the site? ~ yes no Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes no Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes no Exnlanation of atvnical or oroblem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T ~ tree; S ~ shrub; H ~ herb; V ~ vine) Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum % cover '1.i:x c,1x11. c u,11 o(.(; 1 , w', +) L,,O?~ 1 \,\ 0, eccl Q.i1;,, n sP H 30 "/,; J 'uu-10)1 u , I , , ,; t'-f/)1-;1'1 t-f 3C1o HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: %ofdominants0BL,FACW,&FAC ')-5Ce7o Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Indicator Dominant Plant Snecies f\] L PAC et V'Je \~•., f /\Cv1 Date: 3 . )_c . l>t- County: \<-.i' V1tJ State: Vs/ l\. S v, 1 ,,r11-()'() S/T/R: ,; I 2-0,NIS > Community ID: Transect ID: Plot ID: B Stratum % cover Visual observation of plant species growing in areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Morphological adaptations Physiological/reproductive adaptations Wetland plant database Technical Literature Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Other (exnlain) Indicator Hydrophytic vegetation present'! Rationaie for decision/Remarks: f2_eq 1,J/a..r l'j fYJCrvf.cJ N-e t1...1r d r ()..i0tUJ'c. d/ttf HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? ,€) no Based on: ~~-soii temp (record temp---~) \l'J E-T<, tl\.,b\t. other (exolain) Dept. of inundation: __ inches Depth to free water in pit: r.. '' f'YDl11 S ~'l'f V inches Devth to saturated soi I; (;\:r.f inches Check all that apply & explain below: Stream, Lake or gage dat_a: Aerial photo.e:raphs: Other: Wetland Jlydrology present? Rationale for decision/Remarks: {f!J ,,-..ie..\ J s·01 ts , no Water Marks; yes ~ on Drift Lines: yes ~/ Oxidized Root (livJ-r_oots) Channels <12 in. \t.~ no FACNeutral; 'x9 no Other (explain): Sediment Deposits: yes ~ Drainage Patterns: yes @, Local Soil Survey: yes ifi!,; Waler-stained Leaves yes f:_o) Sc1..,1\f\'O)rec\ urpex \.)._1, u SOILS Map Unit Name (Series & Phase) Profile Description I v:lcl ; Ov\11 o I ll ~. Q, ult1'Yl l.J r1 1u s (.\,\'le! 4-\S'')C SI ('/l Drainage Class y X CtSSi ve i 'j cJ i'tli 1U! d Field observations confirm Y!J No ma ed e? I 11 Cl VS c:n.,,, - . Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure) etc. profile moist) moist) (match descriJ;!tion) buff --, -0 ... ·-I --- 11 ,;,; \t"cj f . \ -1 b" IDY\2.::>-i, -·w;,t. -StuYJ d Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Matrix chroma ,; 2 with mottles --__ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aguie Moisture Regime __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ; nclvS\01 __x_ Reducing Conditions __::::_ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List 'A Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=l) matrix Other (exulain in remarks) Hydric soils present? ~ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: Ave tl V't, fltCti J f' c+ &hct$(1.,y \'Y) $( \:::. inc\ vsi 0vv:, · Fa,,· ly Sc~nd~ J Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? EP no Hydric soils present? no ls the sampling point e, no Wetland hydro!m,v present? s within a wetland? no Rationale/Remarks: A i.reo. a.cl _1p. C fv\.+ +-v Y'€; \' C. Setvo C;\/1.0J cl Y-0-. \ Y1 o~<-'i t NOTES: Revised 4/97 r\/7 DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Coro, Wetland Delineation Manual' Project/Site: G;urd.k 'I I Applicant/owner: \< i C\C '\ wvVY /\. \ ('J: (.:; o-1d If ':J sJtY\Y\\ te ~ Ho\ l1i'Y1 f jf 11 n I Frr !nvesti~ator(s): Do Normal Circumstances exist on tbe site? ls the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? ls the area a potential Problem Area? Explanation of atypical or problem area: ~) yes yes no ~ VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Snecles Stratum % cover /tU{{ )(C{ C(,'n{, , ;:rt ,r j()((_,u ~ '2.J; l Vi1,\,,\'(-\-1H.)1J MCjUV-\{ /071 T "\fl;( iv\ Ullr/\1 s1) • \-\ {OU~,, Tupv \vs ttt\s,tm;-kv--, T 10),Z, ~ HYDROPHYTIC \'EGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAcf..5'0"7, Check all indicators that apply & eXJ>lain below: Indicator Dominant Plant Species N\,,, fj$,,$ ' l"AL .:r V"e·i1-e, f/-\0.. Date: County: \l\ vil\ State: \i\/C\ (, \11Y, C\ \1)Y) Sff/R: S / 2,::, I'\\ l 5J Community ID: pf H Transect ID: Plot JD: Cj Stratum % cover Vis;ual observation of plant species growing in areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Morphological adaptations Physiological/reproductive adaptations Wetland plant database Technical Literature Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Other (exolain) Indicator K. Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: . , , 1 \ • · " ~ f_ \leo_c.tl\.hcv1 nY\V\l,v\,1\ ,YiffvY{'Cl -Co mf\'lVV~d i\O~ _ M.l\.h 1'1j., veVG\ \/...1 rr\f._ ...z.C{l_y (uy'f,(Ol(ff (U(i0 V)({,(j h/)1(/iJS f);;V/C/'U1 on btv(t--· DWi'lk.-Y i>'K1 I CAtcd +l,1(l + .:,ff,~1t-e b\ue\:x'. Yj fa,"(t, HYDROLOGY (VJ"":\ V.cv"':-IJ'.:f,., ~€',hcldt/.J +\vc'r \-\C-W 1,~\D S,1Tfl\.Yn, Is it the growing season? r:;;; no ! Water Marks: yes ~ Sediment Deposits: yes @) -"""on"--------~--+---------~--, Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes @ Drainage Patterns: yes@ vV f:l"'S, ~A,\o\-e. other (exnlain) Dept, of inundation: _~_inches Depth to free water in pit: ~ inches Depth to saturated soil: .---inches Check all that apply & explain below: Stream, Lake or gage dat_a: Aerial nhoto£ravhs: ~ Wetland hydrology present? Rationale for decision/Remarks: yes Other: Oxidized Root (live roo~) Channels < 12 in. ves [rid FAC Neutral: yes ~ Other ( explain): Local Soil Survey: yes Qi_v Water~stained Leaves yes e.v SOILS MapUrutName~IY~~=l~1(l,CC-'--Yl~U~lo._;,~).·=e~o~a_.1~~'-Yt--- (Series & Phase) { 1 ,u <;c1.nc\ ;~ -I r;t7° S \o Taxonomy (subgrou t'S D , Cl f1<tC:i,.1v,,l.cJ' clvci1d}. ramage ass · · · Field observatioru confirm f,i; No e? ? ,, Proftle Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match descri:{1tion) 0--2>' 1)v(t -----·-·· - ,, A iOY(ll/;,, ~ ;.,,\,(\ dw l '2 -\2. -::,,\-~ CJ(A,"' \ )-,~,, 0 I 0,12.-i/?, -1 , 5 Y l/' It ~AY\:_~ Lccv V\ Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Matrix chroma 5 2 with mottles --__ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Reducing Conditions __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low.Chroma (=1) matrix Other ( exnlain in remarks) Hydric soils present? yes 't'.') Rationale for decision/Remarks: Tvi,11 llxi\~ (lo/ fill {1vYt'tl , c,euk S'i}l11.{ b ()1.}Yl c,j {l. y:} beiwtch (:, u(d 'i' 'f l Vii' I C\ \r) b DY w1C\ \) vopeJ t YI- Wetland Determination (circle) Hyclrophytic vegetation present? ~~ Q (§) Hydric soils present? yes Is the sampling point yes Wetland hvdroloov present'/ ves '1i1 v.ithin a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: ,_, NOTES: Revised 4/97 DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (:,NA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Curos Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: 0 CKd \ '{' ':J Applicantlowner: 121 Ck::. ,I l C\..,\)T l\. \ fz GoYd\'t' j " i-! l) /ti)Y) ~' lnvesti •ator(s): J011vi 1Fc, Je. \\){\ I H'. < Ecv'.lr Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site'? ' yes @ Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? @ no Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes @) Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Pl ant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species ILIOI.Ctcl f1lrln ·t-1 '?:;D7D FAC oY s /) \f\l'f, \\t.K v ' ti 1v1.C:n Ii 011'\ D:11 ifw, ')..[1'7;; fAC\J HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC .S:v''/o Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Date: ·:', . :i-c . ci=t County: \<'-1,, ") State: Vvcr h1,1(1tt"Y> S/T/R: S .L?,N ~;.:. Community ID: F'fH Transect JD: Plot ID: \D Stratum % cover Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation -2L Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations ---Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical Literature Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? c, no Rationale for decision/Remarks: Indicator -- _,l(._ X l.»\-<, cf-bo.-\1-e_ 'j'{(Nnj -c_jYllt;S dt.'t/l off ~y1)1,ry10 -Vt>CCVv1 c1i r, l-vy\oe\,v1 r D,y-~oN ;., rli(fl+f;/l VJ\) f>V4l>v>rvP ,~ c'lnv. -7_ ~ !-_<;, o.no Cl~ey.o ell . ' HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? 9 no Water Marks: yes ~ Sediment Deposits: yes @.9 on Based on: soil temp (record temp ___ ) Drift Lines: yes *{9· Drainage Patterns: yes l.DJ;) v,Ji:::1c. tc1..t:llf other(exolain) Dept. of inundation: -inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yesCJ' --Channels <12 in.~ no Depth to free water in pit: Cf" p 'YYl S'.:rP ~ WaterMstained Leaves yes loP-1 inche 'l. F AC Neutral: no Deoth to saturated soil: ~nf. inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other ( explain): Stream, La.ke or gage <lat.a: ·-- Aerial uhotoeraohs: Y: Other: Wetland hydrology present? ® no Rationale for decision/Remarks: dvec\ •1 O. . .c\j (I..UE>v,..,\-· A'(.Jc t~ CtY)1 (X', c Je cl .hj 1YOY\C -\-() /I S', h:r{ l'Y\, VVlu-t'..--v CY'\ ( SOILS Map Unit Name _ _lliQ_ I C'(.V) C \tt., ) j j) QLiv,,,y (Series & Phase) h vli _(,'(l,vl(J U Drainage Class Y$Cf 0':'c.,1v{'..ll\ c,i YD,. i Hkd Field observations confirm @ No 4-1 S 0]<> S')C 't/? e? I \!l CI$".; I CVV) cf Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance T exturej concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Mnnsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist\ moist) (match description) 0 ·t-S' -· '.l>vff' -~ - D-0'-4s' A. 7-S'141'/- VYL.ld, Slcvx:h;! c, 1 H iO'(f/.. '?,/1 I s ~2,,, ....€vtt n, 4,c_,:11,' A 1 S'i4/1t vOtl.r>L '5tl,I x::.ii <;1 I\- /(J'(Q..,., /, L-A .J IO'Jc A,C r,, Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Matrix chroma ~ 2 with mottles --__ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions --Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Su,face Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ',( Reducing Conditions __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List ----Y::-Gleyed or Low-Chroma (= l) matrix Other ( explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? e,i no Rationale for decision/Remarks: ~A ~i~Y'e 1 /fP) (l1Y vt- /V1N u bl, l5 _ 5;£.v:,._. { {'.flL.v l'YU-1.,(.k-• Lof-a4-sa,,i.,vd Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ; no 8 Hydric soils present? no Is the sampling point no Wetland hydrolol!V nresent? ye no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: '-../ A '(-f (\ a c~ tt C'.f rlf-+-o v--f' t'€~ilf C Is h.1-Y bt1...na·0.) V\.x / q VJ b lTY 11.)Yl'U._ci tJVf'.,.Y S C1 S J_ Vf'_l)t 11) ~' /., dvcu nn.tJr .. ,ssve. \,'\io...-tex· Pn.TYn ' NOTES: Revised 4197 I SOILS Map Unit Name In& (1){\ JJ i 0, / I O Cl wt 'J h ,'.v., (Series & Phase) 5·a 1/1£/ Drainage Class & (' ( 5 S/V'P (1-- C/.r tZi-11.Jd Field observations confinn @ No Taxonom (sub rou ) L{-I [;"2,, slo e5 ma ed e? Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture~ concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match descrigtion) O-J5t; A ID VR_3/, -· J.,ot:r.;';;;J --,.--,-,rave. f, (" r, • J JS ·i..uvi A /t!YPi 31, ·1,;SY f2'/ . ,, 5(,1 _C-0~,J;,~, So.Jcr/ . f" 'f\ N .,,,. •. {I J Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol :t.. Matrix chroma $ 2 with mottles --__ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions --Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Reducing Conditions __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (-!) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: IZedt,'f.·fa·+ KVYs [) 1o~ (VI' d 2> (~" <!€pf~ Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes G) ~ Hydric soils present? yes ~ Is the sampling point yes Wetland hvdrolol'V present? yes . within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: V~ . V-f.-1:r dA:£+. ?la1,'-fs 2'Y1> {.,L/J -~ ?<..j' + h. ri) JA...2:, k S'r• cijVf./,s NOTES: Revised 4/97 Project/Site: DATA FORM l (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corns Wetland Delineation Manual1 l) UYcJ\€.,~ . , , Date: 7, ·Jc-.,,-1 ' ,•• ,.-' J Applicant/owner: \2._ \ C\c-i l,£,;\J'((,\.,\e.£_ 0th('.) \·{'.,f County: \<-I v1 ') • j t',V\V\ \ ~{'( 1-t o \+-[Ty) 11 Jcvw11 K,l/' (00~ State: \;Y (1. S ~ l ' \'J(t'l!-vl lnvesti gator( s ): S/T/R: 5 I 2-·:,, N / E, Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? yes ~ Community ID: TY.I-~ ls the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? ~ no Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes ~ Plot ID: \}, 7·) Exp(anation of atvoical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Snecies Stratum % cover Indicator juhcvs efF' , . LF0 'lJ":) +\ S'Jo rACV-J ~ . ~ . {)Y,\,le'f\S( ·Iv, o\ 11)YY\. H I c:::,'7c "ff\-CU ftf II i >ChJJ,'L--felmtrle,~ H 5'7i' f Acy/ ·p/AVJ ttl C/0 M£t,1 UY +I 10 1% f'ACv r , - HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % ofdominantsOBL, FACW, & FAC ""1:iD 7, Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations + areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wet! and plant database Morphological adaptations --Personal knowledge of regional plant communities -- Technical Literature Other ( exolain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes ~ Rationale for decision/Remarks: ! Ht.llf ivV'\<:l htt..\ f. .. Vee ) C•CC\/V-S \I\J \,'l,V(-t_ '3 <NY el c;, C'f' ~ C V-.Pci,f-e.ci co'<Yltlil r1e0Ns,JW i)J~-t' (W/-v, f)(ln/1 o,Ak( dVtNf,', ''/)(\_;($(' ,;. HYDROLOGY . • J ls it the growing season? Q no Water Marks: yes (o;3:) Sediment Deposits: yes~ on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes I.@_} Drainage Patterns: yes @!_} \/\I \:C::,c ·lcvoVlother (explain) Dept. of inundation: ~ inches Oxidized Root (live ro~ Local Soil Survey: yes@) Channels <12 in. yes o Depth to free water in pit: -inches FACNeutral: yes no Water-stained Leaves yes~) --Depth to saturated soil: .. inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage dat_a: -- Aerial nhotooraphs: )('' Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes ~ Rationale for decision/Remarks: Soils rM,b,+ , \o u:k ~·t5t 5 Ci_} \,\_, .. l\...~,\ Project/Site: GOV cl \ t" l,J DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or orns e an e neation Manual) 1987C W ti dD li Date: ?) '..>-o ·O't Applicant/owner: \2-i (,I:'__ \ Lo.,u'\,()., I t.1 Go,' c:! i e 'j County: JL1 lnl~ .., . State: WC{ ,; \,i n (z'. f--uv, Investigator(s): ,je_ V1 V1 I~('.\• ti D I h'h!l ,, . Jenr1 ,Ftt t lV)f srrJR: sl 2--,, NI c, Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? V yes @ Community JD: PG/\--/ Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? ® no 1-1 r sfo, ic <li 11 Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes (13 cJicJuYt, r,flot ID: / i Explanation of atvoical or oroblem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H == herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratllm % cover Indicator ·-:, rt I c; 'Jc fACU~ 12~.fh/n(V Iv s r/ FAC1,,i \· I l\..\1 \nq c fVl t~{ cT/ V e.p(.,11.,, i C, ''le -(' . . .>?\,I 1 '>'... SP -\ \ 0 '1 C fA-cv,J ' feot\i(Cl /lrv-Y1d 1nCtC<rt H IS1u fAt- ~ \) \'Y\.k 'I( spp--1-1 c; '7 C Fl'\C 1c ofl>L ?htdtt--\"1 s H ')_c'lo f l\c1'\J tll'VII ci,. o7/l Cl"tC /2--ubvD tcnm.n1t1W"l H 20"70 FAC\J HYDROPHYTIC ,'EGETA TION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC < 0·0·1io Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptatlons --areas of prolonged inundation/saturation -~ Wetland plant database ____x_ Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities y., --Technical Literature Other (exolain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? t, no Rationale for decision/Remarks: r,11 p; \-e. ----·v ·ej--t 1 ~ ,rw , 111(1 cY) p I h' c {'.-\'), \ C... '( __ .<;,, cl V 0... 1 V1 t1 \'fn . W 1--\-\0 f,1)1'1 u ,-(: i 11'.1 .C:n, I<.. Yecl·C v µ v l,\ f\ {t. tnh-1 . I HYDROLOGY J J --.J ls it the growing season? § no Water Marks: yes (!!} Sediment Deposits: yes e§i on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes e,ol Drainage Patterns: yes~~i \1,lt:.Tb •" ,~1..,,-other(exolain) ./ Dept. of inundation: .. -inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes Cl~ --Channels <12 in. ves inb1 - Depth to free water in pit: -inches FAC Neutral: yes~ Waterwstained Leaves yes o) ~- Depth to saturated soil: -inche..c; Check all that apply & explain below: Other ( explain): Stream, Lake or gage dat,a: ---::;:-Aerial ohoto2raohs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes 0j Rationale for decision/Remarks: SD\\':, ($V{Yl() \'.)$\--v,c+ c--;0-..,--\,)YC'°'.:.h'.c-\. SOILS Map Unit Name (Series & Phase) \ V\cl I tt-v1 o I c1. ) ..-to CL1t1 ~ f\ VU. S {Utd Field observations confirm .@s No manned type? l\'1Cl\)<;1 (hrv:> Taxonomy (subgroup) 4 -\ fC?o i: \lff)tS, Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match descri11tion) O·-ti+11 A i 0'<~1/6 --fllLIYl\/ <;tt 11d \ ,,. a bi1 nd Pl V\.l" .~ i'O ''((l 3/)_ 1.,;, '(f!.4/~ \ct-lie I D '"/ /) il\'Ud . .foo.,1,11~ S1u1c1 8r'q wl -Ike I J 1rvi_po Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) --Histosol ...K_ Matrix clu-oma S 2 with mottles __ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions --Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Reducing Conditions __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=l) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? yes !§> Rationale for decision/Remarks: Ne Y,e.d.M-, -~lv\:vYt/.' ob S€nJe£.1 \ I', 1.,rp pe1< 1411 Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Q no ;€) H ydric soils present? yes ~ Is the sampling point yes Wetland hvdroloov present? yes within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: -:puu,ct) ~ W),~ 1,,Lf fW D 1/l!}t ~0-,Vf.-fs. NOTES: Revised 4/97 hJ I I Appendix D. Site photographs Page left blank intentionally. 20 Photo 1: Centra l lawn area east of Gordley home Photo 2 : View to north from fill pile ; right side of photo is re li c peacock cage and beyond is the p revi ous soccer fi eld. 2 1 Photo 3 : View t o wes t ern section of parcel where f illed pon d overflowed i nt o Gordley p arcel after 4-weeks of growth. Photo 4 : Exa mple of dredging to drain st a n ding wa t er from pond to seasona l ditch. 22 Photo 5 : Upland hill on western side of parcel, borders relic driveway. --" Photo 6: Wood and debris pile partially covering reli c parki ng area and driveway . 23 Printed: 08-15-2007 Payment Made: CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA07-090 Receipt Number: Total Payment: 08/15/2007 11 :53 AM 450.00 Payee: CASH Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment 450.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment cash Account Balances Trans Account Code Description 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use or Fence Review 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits 5955 000.05.519.90.42.l Postage 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 450.00 Balance Due .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON AUG 1 5 2007 RECEIVED R0704279 --,--------------------------------------'-........,..---------"----~----------------...,.--------------r---------. GORDLEY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT CITY OF RENTON LUA NC). LUA-07-090-LLA LND NO. LND-30-0332 OWNERS DECLARATION KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE THE UNDERSIGNED OWNER (S) OF THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED . DO HEREBY MAKE A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT THEREOF PURSUANT TO RCW 5B .17 .040 (6) AND DECLARE THIS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT TO BE THE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF THE SAME, AND THAT SAID LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT IS MADE WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRES OF T/-IE OWNER (S). IN WITNESS WHEAEOF WE HAVE SET OUR HANDS AND SEALS. ~'-; ~ ----1!za4!l/!a I · H _, -m., 't 1~t+.A=IJ-R-A~L=£=~"7Lr~-'--"'---11- .. ' \,,J -=~~--=~2::::::_~:::::::::=:=__ LISA MARIE DENZLER APPROVJt\LS· . APPRr;;e ~~ D~Y OF ~-~_,2008, __ }J~ _____________ J:}3_ ___________ _ CITY OF RENTON ADMINISTRATOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. PARENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION RECORDING NO. LOT, 4 OF CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT NUMBER SHPL-060-87, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8805099006, AND THAT POFITION OF LOT 2 OF SAID SHORT PLAT LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE; SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 5, TWP. 23N., RGE. 5£., W.M. NW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 5, TWP. 23N., RGE. 5E.,. W.M. VOL./PAGE BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4, CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WA. THENCE NORTH 89 '29 '00" EAST ON EASTERLY PROJECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4 A DISTANCE OF 226.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 2. SAID POINT BEING SOUTH 00'35'32" EAST A DISTANCE OF 326.88 FEET FROM THE MOST NORTI·/ EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, ANO THE TERMINUS OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED LINE, (BEING KNOWN AS LOT B OF CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER LUA 95-093 LLA UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 95ii299005) TOGETHER WITH THE SOUTH 134 FEET OF THE WEST 126 FEET OF BLOCK 284 G.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NUMBER 4, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 i OF PLATS, PAGE (SJ 82, IN KING COUNT~ WASHINGTON. STATE OF WASHINGTON) VS COUNTY OF KING J I CERTIFY THAT I KNEW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THAT RICHARD GORDL[Y AND LAURAL[£ GORDLEY SIGNED THIS INSTRUMENT ON OATH STATED THAT HE AND SHE IS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT OF SUCH ACT FOR THE USES ANO PURPOSES MENTIONED IN T, JS INSTRUMENT. DA TED THIS ·?i()(:;lf\ DAY OF ' 200B. PRINTED NAME " ) () l,\Cf hmd cc fu y: V NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF· WASHINGTON 1 VS COUNTY OF KING J I CERTIFY THAT I KNEW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THAT Cf-lR/STIAN R. D[NZL[R AND LISA MARIE DENZL[R SIGNED THIS INSTRUMENT ON OATH STATED THAT HE AND SHE IS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT OF SUCH ACT FOR THE USES ANO PURP~S MENTIONED IN THIS INSTRUMENT. DATED THIS ~ · DAY OF Jw~ 2008. Pl-1INTED NAME , _\{,)\....~ }\v\td fur v EASEMENTS, CONDlnONS, RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD AN EASEMENT AFFECTING A PORTION OF SAID PREMISES FOR THE PURPOSES STA TED THEREIN: FOR: EXISTING DRAINAGE DITCH DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED MARCH 21, 1958 RECORDING NUMBER: 4BB4438 AND 48B4439 AS CONSTRUCTED AND THEREFOR NOT PLOTTED ON MAP PAGE. AN EASEMENT AFFECTING A PORTION OF SAID PREMISES FOR THE PURPOSES STATED THEREIN: IN FAVOR OF: CITY OF RENTON FOR: PUBLIC UTILITIES (INCLUDING WATER AND SEWER) DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED: JUNE 29, 1981 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER: 8106290604 NOT PLOTTED PER SHORT PLAT EASEMENT RELEASED BY THE CITY UNDER RECORDING N0.9604170910 . AN EASEMENT AFFECTING A PORTION OF SAID PREMISES FOR THE PURPOSES STA TEO THEREIN: IN FAVOR OF:CITY OF RENTON FOR: PUBLIC UTILITIES . (INCLUDING WATER, WASTEWATER ANO SURFACE WATER) DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED: NOVEMBER 6, 1995 RECORDING NUMBER: 9511060098 ., AN EASEMENT AFFECTING A PORTION OF SAID PREMISES FOR THE PURPOSES ST A TED THEREIN: FOR: INGRESS. EGRESS AND UTILITIES FOR THE PURPOSES OF UTILIZING GRANTEE'S WATER RIGHTS FROM AN UNNAMED CREEK SHORT'PLAT NUMBER SHPL-060-87 DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED: JULY 28, 1995 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER: 9507281245 AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS ANO CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: MAY~ 1988 RECORDING NUMBER: 6805090391 UNPLOTTABLE AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: JANUARY 14, 1991 RECORDING NUMBER: 9101140962 UNPLOTTABLE COVENANT~ CONDITIONS. RESTRICTIONS AND EASEMENTS CONTAINED IN SHORT PLA~ RECORDED: MAY 9, 1988 RECORDING NUMBER: 8805099006 PLOTTED ON MAP PAGE. NOTE: THE UTILITIES EASEMENT NOTED ON SAID SHORT PLAT OVER LOT 2 HAS BEEN RELEASED BY RECORDING NUMBER 9604170909. COVENANTS. CONDITION~ RESTRICTIONS AND EASEMENTS CONTAINED IN LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT. COPY ATTACHED: RECORDED: NOVEMBER 2~ 1995 RECORDING NUMBER: 9511299005 PLOTTED ON MAP PAGE. . I AN EASEMENT AFFECTING A PORTION OF SAID PREMISES FOR TH.E PUrPOSES STATED THEREIN: . . . FOR: UTILITIES · · . RECORDING NUMBER: 9903222552 PLOTTED ON MAP PAGE. RELEASE OF DAMAGE AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS ANO CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDING NUMBER: 8106010672 RELEASING RENTON FROM ALL FUTURE CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES RESULTING FROM SIDE SEWER. AQUIFER PROTECnON NOTICE THE LOTS CREATED HEREIN FALL WITHIN ZONE 2 OF RENTON'S AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA AND ARE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE# 4367. THIS CITY'S SOLE SOURCE OF DRINKING WATER IS SUPPLIED FROM A SHALLOW AQUIFER UNDER THE CITY SURFACE. THERE IS NO NATURAL BARRIER BETWEEN THE WATER TABLE ANO GROUND SURFACE. EXTREME CARE SHOULD BE EXERCISED WHEN HANDLING OF ANY LIQUID SUBSTANCE OTHER THAN WATER TO PROTECT FROM CONTACT WITH THE GROUND SURFACE; IT IS THE OWNERS RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT Tt/E CITY'S DRINKING WATER. 1-------------------,---~----------i RESIDING AT fw)\f\ ;X~{))j J tDc~\'(ii...1 W\o. NOl'ARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RE.sioiNG AT K0v0~ l L,~)ct s,11--1_ ...... L LVVJ NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT:· APPROVALS: KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS EXAMINED ANO APPROVED THIS DAY OF ___ ,2008 TAX ACCOUNT PAFICEL NO. 334390-3563 TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. 334390-3200 RECORDING NO. RECOf~DER 1 S CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD T/-IIS _DAY OF ____ ~2008 IN BOOK . OF AT PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF EDWIN J. GREEN JR .. MANAGER SUPT OF REGOROS MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 0\).....\;\..Q_ rs J '?)6) ~'( MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JcwLt )Si ;J,C~A THE NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT (NGPE) ON THIS SHORT PLAT IDENTIFIES THE REQUIRED WETLAND BUFFER AREA FOR THE WETLANDS ON ADJACENT PARCELS. THE CREATION OF THE NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT (NGPE) CONVEYS TO THE PUBLIC A BENEFICIAL INTEREST IN THE LAND WITHIN THE EASEMENT AREA. THIS LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: THIS LOT L1NE ADJUSTMENT REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY fvfE OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION IN CONFORMANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE APPROPRIATE STATE, COUNTY OR CITY STATUTE OR OR NANCE AT THE REQUEST OF RICHARD ANO RALEE OROLEY IN JUNE OF 2007. d~r CERTIFICATE NO. i525~ATE EXPIRES JNTEREST SHALL BE FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRESERVING NATIVE . ,,; ,,,, .. 'VEGETATION1,fOR THE CONTROL OF SURFACE WATER AND EROSION, .,; • ,;.' . : ,/1AINT,ENANClt· QF SLOPE STABILITY. VISUAL AND AURAL BUFFERING;". '!i f. , . 1/ffQ PROTECTION OF PL.ANT AN[J_ ANIMAL HABITAT. THE NATIVE. GR,OWT/·{', ,,:\ .. . <fi'R_d}ECTiqN EASEMENT ·IMPOSl;S UPON ALL PRESENT AND FUTURE · .. //!'.', ·)!,;,. . ,Q,!'fNERS Af;/(} OCCUP_ IERS OF THE EASEMENT AR~A ENFORCEABLE. ON ; ..• · ,;, . } ·. ,(/.B(£HALF OP'THE PUBLIC BY THE CITY OF RENTON. TO LEAVE;.. , ; , >·, · . 1 1!NOI$JURBED ALL>-TREES ANO OTHER VEGETATION WITHIN THE .. · . 'i(s,EASEMENT./iREA.._'THE VEGETATLDN WITHIN tHE NGPE MAY NOT'BE CUT,. -· '.· RRUNE;.D; CQVE!FjED BY .FILL, REMOVES OR DAMAGED, WITHOUT THE . ·.· .. ''.;'-' ·<fXPRES5ifj.~RI,TTEN,FJ.ERMISSION F;ROM THE CITY OF RENTON. ... ·.-;T 'i.,. l,, 'fHE RtG;jJ, OF ENTRY GRANTED. HEREIN SHALL APPL y TO THE: AGENTS, ', . :::~ .• RE:PRE,f{ENTATIVE ANO EMPLOYEES OF THE OWNERS OR SUBSEQUENT ·· ..•. ·~. OWNERS.OF THE UNDERLYING PROPERTY. . • ens1ons 35402 SE CENTER STREET SNOQUALMIE, WA. 98065 PHONE (425) 396-7646 support@geodlmenslons.net GORDLEY LOT LJNE ADJUSTMENT 2010& 1800JONESAVENE RENTON, WA. 98056 SW 1/4 OF NE 1/4, S. _ _5 __ T. 23../Y._ R . .5£ NW 1/4 OF SE 1/4, S._.5__ T..231::L R . .5£ r-------..------.-----,---,-----1 OWN. BY V.L.J. CHKD. BY E.J.G. DATE 06/20/200 SCALE 1 "=30' JOB NO. 6309 SHEET 1 OF 2 REVISED: 07/21/2008 REVISED: 07/28/2008 -"''·--·----··-···---·. ·--' '" -----------------------------------··------·--·---.. --------·-------·-·-------- •'. --·· ,. -· •'">. --,.----,. ------:~-:-··---'-~ , ' ---' ---. ' ,, CllY OF RENTON HORIZCONTROI.. POINT NO. 266 10/09/2006 FOUND BRASS NAIL IN CONG AT SURFACE LLj -~ ~ <( m ;z: SITE BENCH MARK Q PK NAIL & WASH R ELEV. ON NAIL = 272.89' . U) i . R' QJ I 0 (0 0 I ...J Q :c - {T) (\j . ~ 0) 30.00' CALC 'D z: a 8: <ct: . 3:: . a 30' 3:: I a I Cl: . 0 0 0 "' 3: ' 0 0 -..... {T) • 0 0 < R-0-W BEARING MERIDIAN: GORDLEY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 5, TWP. 23N., RGE. 5E., W.M. NW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 5, TWP. 23N .. RGE. 5E., W.M. VOL./PAGE · C/1Y OF RENTON PER CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT NO. SHPL-060-87, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8805099006, RECORDS OF KING COUNT~ WASHINGTON. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY WASHINGTON A BEARING OF NOO '31 '00 "W ON MONUMENTED CENTERLINE OF JONES AVE N. E. AREA TABLE: SURVEYOR'S NOTES: LUA NO. LUA-07-090-LLA PARENT LOT = 80, 982 SQ. FT. PARCEL A: 1) THE SURVEY SHOWN HEREON WAS LNDNO. GRAPHIC SCALE 1"= 30' GROSS AREA = 3~ 682 SQ.FT. NET AREA = 17, 372 SQ.FT. PARCEL B: PERFORMED AND FIELD LOCATED IN OCTOBER OF 2006 ANO JUNE OF 2007. 10/09/2006 FND. REBAR & CAP 0 AT CALC 'D POSITION ...., _.---. "HELO" ELEV. =267, 1 ' 39.B' HOUSE N0.2010 i, 785 SQ.FT.+/- 24. B' . 30 N89'29'00"E 125.52' - lfl NB9'29'00"E 155.00' . co 06/20/2007 60 GROSS AREA = 43, 310 SQ. FT. NET AREA = 37, 923 SQ.FT. OLD LOT 2) SUBJECT PROPERTY TAX PARCEL NO. 2771604655, · 334390-3200. " ~ -roN z e,11' st-I I M61 4 10;09;2006 r7\....0C-~~e ~~\01'* t-tO· FNO. 2" IRON PIPE . )'l'S (..r 9\'Y\ ') " MARKED BELL . iJ\\,...\....t-lP..f eoeN 11..6,£::. ei AT PROPERTY n. r> .._, 0 \ fr CORNER "HELO.. c,.v r2,0er--Ol.-· I I . ELEV. =253. 5' 6,A Y 3) WETLAND AREA PER THIS SURVEY = 9, 601 SG. FT. +/- WHICH COVERS 12% OF PROPERTY. AREA= 105 SQ.FT.+/-LlN'r: ,59"E C: N78 •5206 , SHED JS 06/20/2007 SET 1./2" BAR & CAP "GEOD LS# 15025" 15' WIDE INGRESS AND EGRESS ASEMENT 22 · 3.5' S. OF LIN N89 °29 '00 "E N89 "29'00"E 115.70' 381.50' 255.50' t 89 ·29 '00" 29.48' - en '"" t t tWF6 WF1 WFB t -r 5 t t ESM'T t t INGRESS, EGRESS AND .. t UTILITIES ESM' T ' REC. N0.9507281245 t I I . t- ~~~~~m WETLA~D t t t "' f- lJ.. . (:J (/) "l" cr-i . l2 (\J t . t ~ t 0) 0) ll.J ' "l" "l" 'St "I" • '<-I 0 U1 125.99' NEWLOT LINE ·PARCEL B 43,310SQ FT 06/20/2007 SET 1/2" BAR & CAP "GEDO.LS# 15025" ESM'T 15' UTILITY ESM'T TO CITY-OF RENTON PER REC. N0.9511060098 oo ·35 · 32··w 28.63' NBB "16' 14 "E 100. 45' ESM'T 15' WIOE INGRESS & EGRESS ' . · ESMT. REC. N0.8805099006 SET 1/2" BAR & CAP "GEOD LS# 15025" ::._.....-1----f;_oGE OF WETLAND AREA t AREA t WF7 9, 601. SQ.FT. +I- ESM'T t :10/09/2006 FND. REBAR & CAP 0 0 t t . t 10' WIDE DRAIN E ESM"T t REC. N9. 8 09~06 0. 2' W. OF PROP-=E~RT~Y __ _ ORNER "HELD" ELEV. =252. 4' ill LOT LIN LND-30-0332 en l'\J Cf) -eil t WFf2 t t' ~-t~,t WFl . l'\J • ~ . -~ .. ····· 30' " {T) l'\J .... ...... R-0-W Cl] "S( LU :::e: ~ 0 0 ...... [rJ . 8'a - (.J ...J "<( (.J 0 "l" . ...... 0 {T) 3:: I a I a: L NA11VE GROWIH AND _ .. , · , PROTECTION AREA LEGEND .FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED @FOUND REBAR & CAP AS NOTED 0FOUND IRON PIPE AS NOTED EASEMENT "SEE CROSS HATCH" • SET 1/2" BAR & CAP "GEOO LS #15025" ..A. WET LAND FLAGS F '• '•] NATIVE GROWTH ANO PROTECTION EASEMENT --t CENTERLINE OF ROAD R-0-W RIGHT~OF-WAY ( ) RECORD 10/09/2006 FND. REBAR & CAP 0.4' E. UNDER RR TIE "DID NOT ACCEPT" . --~ - co 'St . "' ' 0) .... 3: ' 0 o· • en ..... C\i (Y) . • (Y) 0.,.., a-.-, < :;i;; ' 0 a . ..... {T) • 0 C> < a ~-I· ~ .r;~o.f>. t t ~f>o <or;· t -----N87 ·3i '39 "~__/ 49.94' t NOTE: WETLAND FLAGS WERE FIELD LOCATED BY GEODIMENSIONS INC. ON JUNE~ 2007 . PARCEL A 37,672SQFT BUILDING 713 SQ.F 48.3' EWLOT UNE ~~ .. ----' ---..~--..~ ·-·-.-• HOUSE NO 1800 857 SQ.FT . "' . I'-. {T) 59.6' . .. ' '"'. ·, :; ·-_. ·' ' .... . .• N88 '16' 14"E 126.02' R--o---w--"-:·.';i\;.. ---, NBS '16, 14 "E 100. 88. I sE'T ~%~:°~!~o~ CAP ·.,, NBB '16' 14 "E 10/09/2006 FND. REBAR & CAP "LS # 17663" ON LINE "HELD" ELEV. =254. 9' 226. 47' 10/09/200 FNO. REBAR & CAP · " LS # 17663" AT PROPERTY CORNER "HELD" ELEV.=256.2' IO/oq/2006 FOUND MON IN CASE I ' . ' .. ·,. --~ ... ,,· ., . ,/? ·. : ~ < ;,'~.. I~~ "GEOO LS.# 15025" -:'• . , . '.~.9-.\\ .. )''/ \gG -·-1039.24' ~ALC'D t --v1--~~~-. ~ Cf1Y OF RENTON BENCH MARK NO. RENT1B39 1.0/09/2006 FOUND COPPER PIN IN CONG INCASED ELEV. ON PIN= 279.16' . : . ..:-----t . ·, Cf1Y OF RENTON HORIZ.CONTROL POINTNO. 1839 10/09/2006 FOUND COPPER PIN IN CONG INCASED "PUBLICLY DEDICATED" ~ R-0-W ~---'~ REFERENCES USED: CITY OF RENTON LUA-95-093-LLA, V.106, PAGE 179. CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT NO.SHPL-060-87, V. 60, PAGE 270. KCAS MAP N.E. 1/4 SEC. 05-23-05 ALL RECORDS OF KING COUNT~ WA. METHOD OF SURVEY: INSTRUMENTATION FOR THIS SURVEY NASA 1" GEOOIMETER 600 ELECTRONIC DISTANCE MEASURING UNIL PROCEDURES USED IN THIS SURVEY NERE DIRECT AND REVERSE ANGLES, NO CORRECTION NECESSARY, MEETS CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY ANO STATE OF WASHINGTON STANDARDS SET BY WAC 332-130-100. . . ... -~--. " . · N88'16'1 EXPIRES 11/26/2008 • ens1ons 35402 SE CENTER STREET SNOQUALMIE, WA. 98065 PHONE (425) 396-7646 support@geodlmenslons.net . ,.,. __ -·-· ·-----.,. _,,-,.--., .. -, "'"" -, GORDLEY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT t---- 2010 & 1800 JONES A VE NE RENTON, WA. 98056 SW 1/4 OF NE 1/4, S. _ _2 __ T._23N R.5E NW 1/4 OF SE i/4, S. _ _B __ T._23N R. 5E OWN. BY DATE JOB NO. ~'J~k112ooa V. L. J. 06/20/2008 6309 REV: CHKD. BY E.J.G. SCALE 1"=30' SHEET 2 OF 2 ! j I . I ' ' . ; i . I . ' I I I I l I ' • I l . ' ' ; ' ; i 1 ' j i I i. ' ' ' ' Civil -Structural Engineering Comprehensive Project Management Pro.iect: ·1 0 ~ :J Ripley Ln Renton, WA 98056 Prepared for: Bob Dye I . . J Parcel Number: / 334330-27so-oG I Lot Size: 3990 sq. ft PROPERTY LINES - E>!TENO 'TO MEDIAN WATER LINE • -' t:INE • 0 ... I • "' • C\I I 0 ... I in ... ¢ -I j... ./ I I 61 -2'' --------i--...,..._ FROPERTY 1.tNE Footprint size of Constructed Bldgs: 1330 sq. ft. , -12 feet • - - 12·-o~ ---- tt ~ ~ '• ........ . ... t • • \ ,,. • ' • • •• • • 1·, • I '-• ,, t• •, ., •, • •, o , .,1., .• .,, t "II • t' ' ... ,: II I t '1 • t • • >f' ' I • • • I t ,"' I ' •• ,._ • t I • I . •• • , .... ,~"' f". ··:· .... , •• _,,. .. . ' . . ' .. ..... .,.,. r ~·····•''• . : . : P.~~, j,,~I ;_;. I',,, ; ,, ........ ~,, ftl1··' II•\',' 't ,, t llo t 1 ,..,,,,.• "'I., • '• • ,k I~ I •• ,,. ,... • • t'. I t I I I I I . , ...... '"'. . ' .,. ' . . . .. ,,. • ... • \t •. • t• ' • t II I f fl f ' 0 ... I • " • (\I I ~ • I ... Ci • "' • I I() n . . . , , ' ·. . . ' ""• .. , .. : ' . I t I . " I t 1"-.f ,, I I • 't •• .. ~ ............. ,;"'"' .'\• •• --f---1-:\--+---'- / //' ,;¥' --.- / ,, ,, .• ··/··,1· .. ,' /' ,• ;•" / , ,, J: .-· .I' i-----1-r-' J "'-I ......-!~. ~- ' 0 ... I \ , 1-----JI.....-----~--·-"t'-,J. 9';...3-i• 6'-2-li" 21·-2" , · oJ '2 60'-11~~ ' '. t -9 :s'2 feet ,. . ' .. • l / I ' .. ·~8 ~ feet • ~---- ?= a::: 0 z w ~ ....J >-w ...J a.. -a:: Project Description: To construct a parking pad and Retaining wall to avoid parking Along small lane and obstructin1 Traffic and to enable wheelchai1 Access to the entrance · Leg a I Description: Northerly 16.8 ft of Lot 29 and All of Lot 28, Block ''C'', C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Addi· To Seattle, Division Number 3 Proposed Driveway . l I North SITE PLAN SCALE: 1 '' = 20 1