Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRS_Critical_Areas_Study_170407_v1 March 28, 2017 Jamie Waltier Harbour Homes 400 North 34th Street, Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98103 RE: Critical Areas Study – “Cedars at the Highlands” Parcel #45750- 0106 City of Renton, Washington SWC Job#16-152 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report describes our observations jurisdictional wetlands on or within 100’ of the 4.50 acre property known as “Cedars at the Highlands” (Parcel #145750-0110), located off 160th Avenue SE, in the City of Renton, Washington (the “site”). Above: Vicinity Map Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. PO Box 880 Phone: 253-859-0515 Fall City, WA 98024 Harbour – Madison/#16-152 Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. March 28, 2017 Page 2 The site, located in the SE quarter of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 5 East of the W.M., includes a forested area disturbed by past use as a dirt bike track and storage area under the tree canopy, as well as a large shop building with associated gravel driveway and parking areas. The area is abutted by single family parcels to the north and south, and a new road being constructed along the east. The west side of the site abuts 160th Avenue SE. 2.0 METHODOLOGY Ed Sewall of Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. inspected the site in March of 2016. The site was reviewed using methodology described in the Washington State Wetlands Identification Manual (WADOE, March 1997). This is the methodology currently recognized by the City of Renton and the State of Washington for wetland determinations and delineations. The site was also reviewed using the methodology described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987), and the Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast region Supplement (Version 2.0 ) dated June 24, 2010, as required by the US Army Corps of Engineers. Soil colors were ident ified using the 1990 Edited and Revised Edition of the Munsell Soil Color Charts (Kollmorgen Instruments Corp. 1990). The Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual and the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual both requires the use of the three-parameter approach in identifying and delineating wetlands. A wetland should support a predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, have hydric soils and display wetland hydrology. To be considered hydrophytic vegetation, over 50% of the dominant species in an area must have an indicator status of facultative (FAC), facultative wetland (FACW), or obligate wetland (OBL), according to the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9) (Reed, 1988). A hydric soil is "a soil that is saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part". Anaerobic conditions are indicated in the field by soils with low chromas (2 or less), as determined by using the Munsell Soil Color Charts; iron oxide mottles; hydrogen sulfide odor and other indicators. Generally, wetland hydrology is defined by inundation or saturation to Harbour – Madison/#16-152 Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. March 28, 2017 Page 3 the surface for a consecutive period of 12.5% or greater of the growing season. Areas that contain indicators of wetland hydrology between 5%- 12.5% of the growing season may or may not be wetlands depending upon other indicators. Field indicators include visual observation of soil inundation, saturation, oxidized rhizospheres, water marks on trees or other fixed objects, drift lines, etc. Under normal circumstances, indicators of all three parameters will be present in wetland areas. 3.0 OBSERVATIONS 3.1 Existing Site Documentation Prior to visiting the site a review of several natural resourc e inventory maps was conducted. Resources reviewed included the NRCS Soils Survey, the National Wetlands Inventory, and the WDNR Fpars Water Typing Maps. 3.1.1 NRCS Online Soil Mapper Soil Survey The site is mapped as containing Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (Map unit AgC). Alderwood soils are not considered "hydric" or wetland soils according to the publication Hydric Soils of the United States (USDA NTCHS Pub No.1491, 1991). Above: NRCS Soil map of the site. Harbour – Madison/#16-152 Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. March 28, 2017 Page 4 3.1.2 National Wetlands Inventory According to the National Wetlands Inventory for the site, there are no wetlands on or near the site. National Wetlands Inventory map 3.1.3 WDFW Priority Habitats A review of the WDFW Priority Habitat map covering the site revealed no priority habitats or species within 1,000’ of the site. Above: WDFW Priority Habitat Map of the site. Harbour – Madison/#16-152 Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. March 28, 2017 Page 5 3.1.4 WDNR Fpars Water Type Mapping According to the WDNR Water Type Map for the site, there are no mapped streams or waters on the site. Above: WDNR Fpars Water Type Map 3.1.5 City of Renton Stream Map The City of Renton Stream map has no streams mapped on or near the site. The closest streams are several Class 4 streams mapped approximately 4,000’ east of the site. Above: City of Renton Stream Map Harbour – Madison/#16-152 Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. March 28, 2017 Page 6 3.1.6 Mindys Place Wetland Study Sewall wetland Consulting conducted a study of the parcel immediately to the north of the site referred to as Mindy’s Place. This site was found to what at the time under old Code was classified as a Class 4 water with an associated 35’ buffer. This stream exited the Mindy’s Place site at its southeast corner and continued onto the site. 3.2 Field Observations 3.2.1 Uplands As previously described, the site contains a gravel driveway accessing a large shop building on the site. There is also a small outbuilding east of the site, as well as large gravel parking areas, as well as scattered vehicles. The western portion of the site contains an open canopy forested area with 20-30 year old cottonwood trees with a sparse to bare understory. Scattered patches of Himalayan blackberry, indian plum, hazelnut, vine maple and stinging nettle are also present throughout the site. This area has been significantly disturbed in the past and most soil pits excavated within this area revealed a mix of fill and natural soils mixed. The drainage ditch along the east side of 160th drains through a culvert passing through the site to the east. Soil pits excavated in the upland areas revealed disturbed gravelly loam as well as a high chroma, dry gravelly loam soil. 3.2.2 Wetlands No areas meeting wetland criteria were found on the site. 3.2.3 Waters As previously stated, a small ephemeral stream channel passes through the northeast corner of the site. The ordinary high water mark of this stream was flagged with white and blue flagging labeled OHWMW1-W6. As defined in RMC 4.50.G7.a, this stream best meets the criteria of a Type Ns water due to its intermittent flow and lack of fish use. Harbour – Madison/#16-152 Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. March 28, 2017 Page 7 Per Renton Code section 4.50.G.2, Type Ns streams have a 50’ buffer measured from the OHWM as well as a 15’ BSBL measured from the edge of the buffer to any structure. 4.0 Proposed Project The proposed project is the construction of a 14 lot plat with associated infrastructure. No impacts to the Type Ns stream or its buffer are proposed. If you have any questions regarding this report, please call us at (253) 859-0515 or at esewall@sewallwc.com . Sincerely, Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. Ed Sewall Senior Wetlands Ecologist PWS #212 REFERENCES Cowardin, L., V. Carter, F. Golet, and E. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-79-31, Washington, D. C. Daubenmire, R. 1959. A canopy-coverage method of vegetational analysis. Northwest Science 33:43-64. Diers, R. and J.L. Anderson. 1984. Development of Soil Mottling. Soil Survey Horizons, Winter 1984, pg 9-15. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Hitchcock, C. and A. Cronquist. 1976. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington. Munsell Color. 1988. Munsell Soil Color Charts. Kollmorgen Instruments Corp., Baltimore, Maryland. National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. 1991. Hydric Soils of the United States. USDA Misc. Publ. No. 1491. Reed, P., Jr. 1988. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). 1988. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Inland Freshwater Ecology Section, St. Petersburg, Florida. Reed, P.B. Jr. 1993. 1993 Supplement to the list of plant species that occur in wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). USFWS supplement to Biol. Rpt. 88(26.9) May 1988. CEDARS AT THE HIGHLANDS14120 160TH AVENUE SERENTON, WASHINGTON 98059CEDARS AT THE HIGHLANDS CEDARS AT THE HIGHLANDS AAANNNNNNN LUA:U:DRS PROJECT NO. 16041A-NNNNNNNNS ERISSEFORPINGOERDETSREENG I NELA53232 OI ET A T H SOY SFOTGNIHASWIDEIPL.OCILAZPRELIMINARY PLAT0GRAPHIC SCALE20'40'80'1 INCH = 40 FT. PfojectfStte: Applicant/Owner: Investigators): WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region fNA«J.)'s<^- 75^SM.i/< City/County: ~F-UJ'h>-J Sampling Date: *3—^ State; U/A Sampling Point: «P P Landform (hilfslope, terrace, etc.):. Subregion (LRR): Soil Map Unit Name: Lat:. Section, Township, Range; , Local relief (concave, convex, none);. . Long: NWI classificatipn: . _ Slope (%):. Datum: No (If no, explain in Remarks.) No Are climatic / bydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology. , significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes. _ Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology. naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. HvdrophyircVegefatteh Present? Yes. No / HvdrieSoil Presents Yes:. No . '.A Is the Sampled Area / within aWetJand? Yes No .'\i\fetoH-M^at69V;)^es^rSr?' Yes No P.emarks: VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants, Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species / That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC: ' (A) Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species / That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC: ' (A) 2, Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: ~-) (B) 3. Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: ~-) (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species -s, That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC: •> 5 fA/B) - Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species -s, That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC: •> 5 fA/B) Saplirw/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply bv: Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply bv: 3. OBL. species X i^ 4. FACW species X2 = 5. FAC species x 3 = =Total Cover FACU species. x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1 UPLsoedes x5 = 1. Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Prevalence index = B/A = 3. Prevalence index = B/A = 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators; , ; Dominance Test is >50% , Prevalence Index ts =S3.01 Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) ^Indicators of hydric soil and v/etland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 5. Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators; , ; Dominance Test is >50% , Prevalence Index ts =S3.01 Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) ^Indicators of hydric soil and v/etland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators; , ; Dominance Test is >50% , Prevalence Index ts =S3.01 Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) ^Indicators of hydric soil and v/etland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 7. Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators; , ; Dominance Test is >50% , Prevalence Index ts =S3.01 Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) ^Indicators of hydric soil and v/etland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 8. Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators; , ; Dominance Test is >50% , Prevalence Index ts =S3.01 Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) ^Indicators of hydric soil and v/etland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 9. Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators; , ; Dominance Test is >50% , Prevalence Index ts =S3.01 Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) ^Indicators of hydric soil and v/etland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 10. Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators; , ; Dominance Test is >50% , Prevalence Index ts =S3.01 Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) ^Indicators of hydric soil and v/etland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 11. Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators; , ; Dominance Test is >50% , Prevalence Index ts =S3.01 Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) ^Indicators of hydric soil and v/etland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators; , ; Dominance Test is >50% , Prevalence Index ts =S3.01 Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) ^Indicators of hydric soil and v/etland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. — Total Cover Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) Hydrophytic Vegetation 1. .... Hydrophytic Vegetation 2. Hydrophytic Vegetation •= Totai Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Present? Yes No Remarks: " fa ^ fc^c^ej ^^el^sA^ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast - Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point, Profile Description: (Describe to trie depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth . Matrix Redox Features finches) Color (moist) Color (rooisfl Type1 to? . Texture Remarks 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depietion, RW-Reduced Matrix. CS=Covefed or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil indicators: (Applicable t&ali LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Histcsol(A1) . Histlc Epipedon (A2) Black Hisfic (A3) Hydiogen Sulfide (A4) Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) , Thick Dark Surface (A12). , Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) _ , Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': 2cmMuok(A10) , Red Parent Materia} (TF2) Other (Expiate in Remarks) 'indicators of hydrophytic vegetation arid wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: , Depth (inches):. Hydric Soil Present? Yes. Ho Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply),. Surface Water (Ai) , High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Sediment Deposits (B2) : Drift Deposits (B3) Algal Mat or Crust (84) , Iron Deposits (B5) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) , Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) Salt Crust (B11) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Oxidized Rhtzospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Stunted or Stressed Plants (01) (LRR A) Other (Explain in Remarks) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) _ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) . Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) . Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery. (C9) Geomorphic Position (D2) __ Shallow Aquiiard (D3) FAC-NeutraITest(05) , Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) , Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes L Water Table Present? Yes. Saturation Present? Yes _ (includes capillary fringe) /bvo% (inches): No, No ' ydeptli (inches):. No A Depth (inches):. Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes. No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if'available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast — Interim Version WETtAMO DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains* Valleys, and Coast Region Protect/Site: /M-^l'S«~ lZc%tAiS{ City/County: "Rw"f&~> Sampttno Date: "8^^"^^ _____ State: U'A Sampling Point: j> P^L- Ax AppBcani/Owner:„ investigators}: __ Lancfform (hSslope, terrace, etP.);. Subreotortfj-RR}:. tat: Section, Township, Range: , Local refef (concave, convex, none): Long:_ _ Siope (%}:. Datum; Soft Map Unit Name: NWl classification: Are ctimafJc / hydrotogie conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Are Vegetation Soil, _ or Hydrology. signiftcanfly disturbed? Are Vegetation _____ Soil , or Hydrology naturaily problematic? No (if no. explain in Remarks.) Are'NormalCircumstances*present? Yes. (if needed, expiate any answers in Remarks,) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map^showing sampling point locations, transects, important features^ etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soif Present? Yes. Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes. No. No is the Sarapfed Area within a Wetland? Yes No. Remarks: VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? State Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species , That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC: 1 (A) Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species , That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC: 1 (A) 2. Totai Number of Dominant / Species Across AH Strata: ' (B) 3. Totai Number of Dominant / Species Across AH Strata: ' (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Specfes That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC: / o L> (Am ~ Total Cover Percent of Dominant Specfes That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC: / o L> (Am SaDimo/Shrub Stratum {Plotsfee: ) 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Totat % Cover of: MuMpfybv: 2. ... Prevalence Index worksheet: Totat % Cover of: MuMpfybv: 3. OBL soecies x 1 = 4. FACW species x2 = 5. FAC soecies X 3 =• = Total Cover FACU soecies x4 = Herb Stratum (Piotsize: "> UPL soectes x 5 a 1. Column Totals: (AV (B) 2. Prevalence index = B/A = 3. . Prevalence index = B/A = 4. HydropHytte vegetation Indicators: c,eorrtinartceTest is>S0% Prevalence Index is sS.O* Mwpftoiogtcal Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Probiemalic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) ''indicators of hydric soH and wetiand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or probleraaie. 5. HydropHytte vegetation Indicators: c,eorrtinartceTest is>S0% Prevalence Index is sS.O* Mwpftoiogtcal Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Probiemalic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) ''indicators of hydric soH and wetiand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or probleraaie. 6. HydropHytte vegetation Indicators: c,eorrtinartceTest is>S0% Prevalence Index is sS.O* Mwpftoiogtcal Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Probiemalic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) ''indicators of hydric soH and wetiand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or probleraaie. 7. HydropHytte vegetation Indicators: c,eorrtinartceTest is>S0% Prevalence Index is sS.O* Mwpftoiogtcal Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Probiemalic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) ''indicators of hydric soH and wetiand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or probleraaie. 8. HydropHytte vegetation Indicators: c,eorrtinartceTest is>S0% Prevalence Index is sS.O* Mwpftoiogtcal Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Probiemalic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) ''indicators of hydric soH and wetiand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or probleraaie. 9. HydropHytte vegetation Indicators: c,eorrtinartceTest is>S0% Prevalence Index is sS.O* Mwpftoiogtcal Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Probiemalic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) ''indicators of hydric soH and wetiand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or probleraaie. 10. HydropHytte vegetation Indicators: c,eorrtinartceTest is>S0% Prevalence Index is sS.O* Mwpftoiogtcal Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Probiemalic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) ''indicators of hydric soH and wetiand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or probleraaie. 11. HydropHytte vegetation Indicators: c,eorrtinartceTest is>S0% Prevalence Index is sS.O* Mwpftoiogtcal Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Probiemalic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) ''indicators of hydric soH and wetiand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or probleraaie. HydropHytte vegetation Indicators: c,eorrtinartceTest is>S0% Prevalence Index is sS.O* Mwpftoiogtcal Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Probiemalic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) ''indicators of hydric soH and wetiand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or probleraaie. = Totat Cover Woodv Vine Stratum (Piotsize: \ Hydrophytic / Vegetation 1. Hydrophytic / Vegetation 2. Hydrophytic / Vegetation -TotafCover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Present? Yes _ No Remarks* US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Vatteys, and Coast - interim Versfoh SOIL Sampling Point. Profile Description: {Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.} Depth , Matrix : Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % '. type1 toca \ Texture Remarks Mc 3 fa ^Type: OConcerttration. 0=Oeptetipn. RM^Rediiced Matrix, (^-Covered or Coated Sand Grains, ^Location: PL=Pore Lining, ^gMatrix. Indicators for Problematic HydWe Soils'; 2cmMuck(AtO) Red Parent Materia! (TF2) , Other (Explain in Remarks) 'indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric SoH Indicators: (Applicable to at! LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Histoso!(A1) . Histte Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) . Hydrogen Suffide (A4) Oepteted Bejow Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (At 2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix {56) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA t) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix <F3) .. Redox Dark Surface (F6) , Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (If presstti): Type:, , Oeoth finches); Hydrie Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland HydroJooy Indicators: Primary lndicatctfs,(rntnirnum of one required: check all fflat apply), Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Wafer Marks {S1) . Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Oeposits (B3) „ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) iron Deposits (85) Surface Soft Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (except MLRA -f,2,4A,and4B) Saft Crust (B11) Aquatic Invertebrates {B13) Hydrogen Suide Odor (C1) Oxidized Rnlzospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (€6) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Other (Explain in Remarks) J- Secondary indicators (2 or more required) Water-Stained Leaves <B9) (MLRA 1, % 4A,and4B) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) . Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (CS) Geomofphic Position(D2) __ Shallow Aq«itard(D3) _ FAC-NeutralTest(D5} Raised Ant Mounds (OS) (LRR A) Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) Field Observations: t/j Surface Water Present? Yes No /Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No /•Depth finches'): Saturafion Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wettand Hydroloav Present? Yes Mo (includes caplary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast — Interim Version