HomeMy WebLinkAboutHEX Staff Report_09-151_4-11-17DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: April 11, 2017
TO: Phil Olbrechts, Hearing Examiner
FROM: Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager
SUBJECT: Quendall Terminal, LUA09-151
Following the canceled public hearing from April of 2016, the Applicants have requested
the City consider a Development Agreement. As such, this memorandum addresses the
Development Agreement and changes to the project which result from the proposed
Development Agreement. This memo is intended to supplement the staff report to the
Hearing Examiner which was issued in April of 2016, for the original scheduled hearing
date of April 19, 2016. Only those items identified below have been changed and/or are
proposed to be changed from the original staff report.
Updated Project Description:
The applicant has requested approval of Master Plan Review, Binding Site Plan,
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and a Development Agreement for a mixed-
use development located at 4350 Lake Washington Blvd. The site is 21.46 ac and is
zoned COR and located within the Urban Shoreline designation. The 21.46 -acre site
would be divided into 7 lots of which 4 would contain mixed -use buildings. The
Enhanced Alternative would contain 692 residential units (resulting in a net residential
density of 40.95 units/acre), 42,190 sq. ft. of commercial uses [retail and restaurant],
1,352 parking spaces and 12.9 acres of parks/open space. All buildings are designed to
be constructed as 3 – 5 stories over one parking/commercial level. The applicant has
proposed to dedicate 3.65 acres for public right -of-way, which would provide access to
the 7 proposed lots. The site contains approximately 0.81 acres of wetlands and 1,583
linear feet of shoreline along Lake Washington. The subject site has received a
Superfund designation from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the
property owners are currently working on a remediation plan with EPA. The proposed
Development Agreement and associated Enhanced Alternative primarily include the
following: 1.3 acres of public park space, additional retail/restaurant/office space and
street activation (fountains, artwork, etc.), the addition of either a public dock/pier
and/or an alternative approved by the EPA to allow for public access to Lake
Washington, Building SW4 would be 4-stories, building SW3 would 5-stories, and all the
remaining buildings would be 6-stories, and Extension of Land Use Permit approval term
to 10-years with possible extension opportunities in which development regulation
vesting would be maintained.
Phil Olbrechts, Hearing Examiner
Page 2 of 7
April 11, 2017
The following Exhibits should be added to the Recorded:
Exhibit 19 – Memorandum to Hearing Examiner, April 11, 2017
Exhibit 20 – Draft Development Agreement
Exhibit 21 – Consistency Analysis
Exhibit 22 – Notice of Issuance of Consistency Analysis
Exhibit 23 – Councils Motion to defer the Development Agreement Public Hearing
Findings of Fact (FOF): (the following FOF’s are identified with letters to eliminate and
confusion with the original staff report)
a. On March 16, 2017 an Enhanced Alternative and Development Agreement
(Exhibit 20) was submitted to the City to consider. The Enhanced Alternative
would contain 692 residential units (resulting in a net residential d ensity of 40.95
units/acre), 42,190 sq. ft. of commercial uses [retail and restaurant], 1,352
parking spaces and 12.9 acres of parks/open space. All buildings are designed to
be constructed as 3 – 5 stories over one parking/commercial level. The proposed
Development Agreement and associated Enhanced Alternative primarily include
the following:
The addition of 1.3 acres of public park space;
Additional retail/restaurant/office space and street activation (fountains,
artwork, etc.)
The addition of either a public dock/pier and/or an alternative approved by
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to allow for public access to Lake
Washington;
Building SW4 would be 4-stories, building SW3 would 5-stories, and all the
remaining buildings would be 6-stories;
Extension of Land Use Permit approval term to 10-years with possible
extension of 5 years in which development regulation vesting would be
maintained.
A SEPA transportation re-evaluation requirement at 5 year increments.
b. The Enhanced Alternative and the associated Development Agreement is the
sole proposal being advanced at this time. Because the Enhanced Alternative
relies upon City Council approval of the Development Agreement, Exhibit 20, the
Master Site Plan, Binding Site Plan and Shoreline Permit decision shall be
contingent upon the City Council approval of the Development Agreement . If
the Development Agreement is not approved by City Council, the record should
be reopened and another public hearing for the purpose of reconsidering the
decision utilizing the Preferred Alterative analyzed in the April 2016 staff report
to the Hearing Examiner should be completed.
c. On March 20, 2017 the Environmental Review Committee issued an EIS
Consistency Analysis for Development Agreement and the associated Enhanced
Alternative (Exhibit 21 and 22). The Environmental Consistency Analysis
determines that the impacts of development under the Enhanced Alternative are
within the impacts analyzed under the EIS alternatives in the past SEPA review.
Phil Olbrechts, Hearing Examiner
Page 3 of 7
April 11, 2017
No new mitigation measures are required beyond those identified in the 2015
FEIS and 2015 Mitigation Document, and there are no significant unavoidable
impacts that cannot be mitigated.
d. A detailed master site plan has not been provided incorporating the changes
identified in the Enhanced Alternative. As such, staff recommends as a condition
of approval that a final detailed master site plan shall be submitted to the City
for Review and Approval by the Current Planning Project Manager that
incorporates both the specific changes identified in the Enhanced Alternative
and all the conditions of project approval. The final details master plan shall be
approved prior to the approval of any site specific site plan review or recording
of the binding site plan.
e. Staff does not expect that the changes identified in the Enhanced Alternative
would impact the analysis and associated recommended conditions of the April
2016 staff report for all Findings of Fact except as follows:
i. FOF 23, Zoning Development Standard Compliance, Parking: The total
parking stalls proposed in the Enhanced Alternative is 1,352 stalls an
increase from the 1,337 stalls proposed in the Preferred Alternative, a 15
stall increases. There is no change in the residential and restaurant
space; however there is an increase in retail space from 20,025 SF to
33,190 SF which would result in a maximum of 133 stalls required for the
retail space, up from 80 stalls. Together all three uses could require up to
1,469 parking stalls.
ii. FOF 23, Zoning Development Standard Compliance, Refuse and Recycling:
Based on a proposal for a 9,000 SF of restaurant and 33,190 SF of retail a
combined total of 210.95 SF for recyclables deposit areas and 421.90 Sf
of refuse deposit areas shall be provided for the overall project.
iii. FOF 25, Critical Areas, b.: The reference to “NRD settlements” should be
eliminated because the EPA does not approve and is not party to an NRD
settlement. Therefore, Condition 44. IV, should be amended to remove
the reference to “NRD settlements”.
iv. FOF 26, Master Site Plan Review, f. On Site Impacts, Structure and Scale:
With the addition of retail/commercial space along the Lake Washington
side of the development it is anticipated that the parking garage would
no longer be the dominate structure viewed from the Lake or shoreline
trail.
v. FOF 26, Master Site Plan Review, j. Distinctive Focal Points: The “street
activation” identified in the development agreement are anticipated to
provide distinctive focal points throughout the development. However,
the specifics have not been identified at this time. As such staff
recommends as a condition of approval that Public Art, fountains, or
other street activation features proposed to be located in the roadways
shall be identified with the detailed master site plan and constructed and
installed as a part of the associated roadway/infrastructure construction.
Phil Olbrechts, Hearing Examiner
Page 4 of 7
April 11, 2017
vi. FOF 26, Master Site Plan Review, Phasing: Staff recommends that the
project duration be consistent with the time frames established in the
Development Agreement, Exhibit 20.
vii. FOF 28 Availability and Impact of Public Services, Stormwater: The
Development Agreement would extend the project beyond January 1,
2022, as such specific requirements tying compliance with an updated
stormwater manual to this date are no longer applicable. Therefore staff
recommends that condition of approval 32 of the staff report be
removed. The project will be required to comply with all applicable
stormwater requirements at the time of building and construction.
viii. FOF 28 Availability and Impact of Public Services, Transportation: The
Enhanced Alternative is estimated to generate 5,829 daily, 435 AM peak
hour and 545 PM peak hour vehicular trips at full buildout. These would
represent approximately 173 more daily trips, no net change in AM peak
our trips and 15 more PM peak hour trips than the Preferred Alternative.
Additionally, the center left-turn lane that was included as a part of
Street ‘A’ is eliminated in the Enhanced Alternative. The removal of this
turn lane was evaluated by TranspoGroup, in a memorandum dated
January 12, 2017, Appendix A of the Consistency Analysis, Exhibit 21. The
analysis concluded that the center turn lane is not needed under the
Enhanced Alternative because single-lane approaches at each of the
Street ‘A’ intersections would provide acceptable traffic operations. As a
result condition of approval 44. XIV should be amended accordingly.
Additional transportation analysis was included in the EIS Consistency
Analysis to evaluate changes in trips from the Preferred Alternative. The
Consistency Analysis concludes that transportation impacts of the
Enhanced Alternative would be within the range of impacts identified in
the DEIS, EIS Addendum and FEIS for the EIS alternatives. With
implementation of the project mitigation measures, with or without the
I-405 improvements, significant transportation impacts are not
anticipated
ix. FOF 28 Availability and Impact of Public Services, Parks: The Development
Agreement adds 1.3 acre Public Park to the proposal. The hours of public
use of the park should be consistent with the public trail and should be
determined by the City’s Community Services Administrator. Currently
public park hours are dawn to dusk, signage shall be installed identifying
that the park is for public use and the hours of public use. The signage
shall be reviewed and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager
and Parks Planning and Natural Resources Director prior to insulation. An
easement for public access shall be recorded on with the binding site
plan. Similar to the trail, the park shall be installed prior to Temporary
Occupancy of the first building on the site.
Phil Olbrechts, Hearing Examiner
Page 5 of 7
April 11, 2017
x. FOF 29 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, Time Requirements for
Shoreline Permits: The Draft Development Agreement extends the time
for all land use permit applications including the Shoreline Substantial
Development Permit. Time frames identified in the Development
Agreement should be applied accordingly.
f. Condition of Approval 14 should remove the word “east” as this has been
included in error.
g. Condition of Approval 22 contains a minor error, the word “East” should be
“West”. Condition of Approval 22 should be amended accordingly.
h. Condition 43 requires an easement be recorded to all for public access for
vehicles and pedestrians to cross the King County rail-road right-of-way. This
requirement for an easement limits the type of legal documents that could be
drafted to accomplish the intended purpose of the condition. As such, this
condition should be amended as shown below.
i. The word “Public Promenade” should be removed throughout the staff report
and replaced with “fire lane and utility maintenance access road” to be
consistent with the Consistency Analysis and Development Agreement.
Therefore Condition of approval 41. and 44. XVI should be amended accordingly.
Conclusions: All conclusions in the April 2016 staff report are to remain except as
identified below:
10. The project An expiration date shall be as identified in the Development
Agreement, Exhibit 20set by the Hearing Examiner for the Master Site Plan, see FOF 26 .
12. The Development Agreement as drafted in Exhibit 20 is compliant with RCW 36 -70B-
170.
New Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Master Site Plan,
Binding Site Plan, and Shoreline Substantial Permit for the Enhanced Alterative
described in Exhibit 19, subject to all the conditions of approval of the April 2016 staff
report and any new conditions or modified conditions below.
Because the Enhanced Alternative relies upon City Council approval of the Development
Agreement, Exhibit 20, staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner add a condition
that if the Development Agreement is not approved by City Co uncil, the Hearing
Examiner will reopen the record and the public hearing for the purpose of reconsidering
the decision utilizing the Preferred Alterative analyzed in the original April 2016 staff
report to the Hearing Examiner.
Amended Conditions of Approval:
14. The private access at the Barbee Mill Access shall include frontage
improvements matching the south side of the access, including a landscaped
planter and sidewalk to be provided on the east north side. The new private
Phil Olbrechts, Hearing Examiner
Page 6 of 7
April 11, 2017
access to be located at the Ripley Lane (Seahawks Way) access shall include 8
feet wide landscape planter and 6 foot wide sidewalk on south side of the
access. These off-site improvements shall be designed, permitted, constructed,
and substantial complete as determined by the Current P lanning Project
Manager and the Construction Inspector, prior to Temporary Occupancy of the
first building on the project site
22. East West elevations of the building proposed on Lots 2 and 5 shall be re-
designed to reduce to the parking garage walls view from Lake Washington to
ensure the structures on the lake maintain a relation to the natural characteristic
and site amenities (trail, etc.). Design features could include landscape berming
and/or architectural details. Detail design of these buildings shal l be completed
at site plan review.
32. Any extension to the project approved beyond January 1, 2022 or building and
construction permits submitted that would extend the project beyond January
1, 2022 shall be subject to the updated stormwater manual, in e ffect at the
time.
41. A public promenade fire lane and utility maintenance access road along Lake
Washington extending along the front of Lots 2 and 5, connecting to Road B
terminus and the surface parking at either end shall be incorporated into the
design of the buildings on Lots 2 and 5. This promenade fire lane and utility
maintenance access road shall feature pedestrian amenities such as furniture,
public art, water features, etc. Design of the promenades fire lane and utility
maintenance access road compliance with this condition shall be reviewed at
the time of lot specific site plan review.
43. An easement shall be secured from King County or other future property owners
of the rail-road right-of-way to provided vehicular and pedestrian access to the
proposed development across the right-of-way. The easement shall be noted on
the final binding site plan and shall be recorded concurrently with the binding site
plan. Documentation shall be provided to the City of Renton identifying rights for
public vehicular and pedestrian access to the proposed development across the
right-of-way. This legal documentation shall be noted on the final binding site plan
and shall be recorded concurrently with the binding site plan, if not already
recorded. The City of Renton shall have final approval of acceptable legal access
documentation.
44. IV. A site plan application, construction permit application or the recording of
the Binding Site shall not be submitted to the City for Review and approval prior
to a Record of Decision (ROD) and NRD Settlement completed by the EPA. A
copy of the final ROD and NRD Settlement issued by the EPA shall be submitted
to the City of Renton to verify the assumed baseline assumptions were correct
and additional SEPA review or major project changes are not necessary as
required in Mitigation Measure C10.
Phil Olbrechts, Hearing Examiner
Page 7 of 7
April 11, 2017
44. XIV. A transportation study shall be completed to analyze the need for a center
turn lane in Road A. Depending upon the outcome of this study, Road A street
designs shall be amended to remove the center turn lane accordingly and the
design shall be reflected on the required updated site plan, as conditioned above
under XIII.
44. XVI. If the EPA ROD and any NRD settlement eliminates the significant public
access from the project, which includes: 1) A shoreline trial with viewpoints,
interpretive signage, and amenities as identified in the Mitigation Document; 2)
A public promenade fire lane and utility maintenance access road along the lake
side of the development of Lots 2 and 5; 3) Large plazas at the terminus of Road
B; and 4) Public parking a new public access plan shall be submitted identifying
compliance with the significant public access standards of the Shoreline Master
Program. The new public access plan shall be reviewed and approved by the
Current Planning Project Manager
New Conditions of Approval: (The following numbering picks up at the end of the April
2016 staff report.)
45. An easement for public park access shall be recorded with the binding site and
public access shall be noted on the binding site plan prior to recording.
46. Public park signage shall be installed identifying that the park is for public use
and the hours of public use. The park signage shall be reviewed and approved by
the Current Planning Project Manager and the Community Services
Administrator with the construction permit application. The park and associated
signage shall be installed prior to Temporary Occupancy of the first building on
the project site.
44. XVIII. A final detailed master site plan shall be submitted to the City for Review
and Approval by the Current Planning Project Manager that incorporates both
the specific changes identified in the Enhanced Alternative and all the conditions
of project approval. The final detailed master plan shall be approved prior to the
approval of any site specific site plan review or recording of the binding site plan.
44. XIX. Public Art, fountains, or other street activation features proposed be located
in the roadways shall be identified with the detailed master site plan and
constructed and installed as a part of the associated roadway/infrastr ucture
construction.
44. XX. A detailed public park design, identifying compliance with the Development
Agreement, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Current Planning
Project Manager and the Community Services Department prior to the approval
of any site specific site plan review or recording of the binding site plan .
Draft Quendall Terminals Development Agreement Page 1
When Recorded, Return to:
CITY CLERK’S OFFICE
City of Renton
1055 S. Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR QUENDALL TERMINALS
Grantors: The City of Renton and Quendall Terminals
Grantees: The City of Renton and Quendall Terminals
Abbreviated Legal Description: TO BE INSERTED
Additional Legal Description on Page 15 of Document (Exhibit A)
Assessor’s Property Tax Parcel/Account Number: 2924059002 OR □ NOT YET ASSIGNED
THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) by and between the CITY OF
RENTON, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
Washington (“City”), and QUENDALL TERMINALS, a Washington joint venture, its
successors and assigns (“Developer”), is made and entered into this ____ day of
________ , 2016 (the “Effective Date”) pursuant to the authority of RCW 36.70B.170 et
seq. The City and Developer are the Parties to this Agreement.
RECITALS
A. Developer is the developer of that certain real property comprising 20.3
acres more or less located between Lake Washington and Lake Washington Boulevard,
and that certain real property comprising 1.2 acres more or less across the railroad right
of way to the east, both within the municipal bo undaries of the City of Renton in King
County, Washington, and legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and depicted on
Exhibit A-1 (the “Quendall Property” or “Property”)).
B. Developer intends to develop the Quendall Property as a mixed-use
multi-family residential development (the “Project”), as more particularly described in
land use applications, LUA09-151, on file with the City of Renton and, subject to this
Agreement, including the Enhanced Alternative described herein. Project development
may be phased, subject to the conditions of the Hearing Examiner’s Decision.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
Quendall
Terminals
Renton, Washington
February 9, 2017
prepared by
City of Renton
Department of Community and Economic Development
DEPARTMENTOFCOMMUNITYANDECONOMICDEVELOPMENT\)NOTICEOFISSUANCEANDAVAILABILITYENVIRONMENTALIMPACTSTATEMENTCONSISTENCYANALYSISNoticeisherebygivenunderWAC197-11-510andRMC4-9-070thattheEnvironmentalImpactStatementConsistencyAnalysis(EnvironmentalConsistencyAnalysis)fortheproposaldescribedbelowwasissuedbytheCityofRentonEnvironmentalReviewCommitteeon(ERC)Monday,March20,2017,andisavailableforpublicreview.TheERChasdeterminedthattheproposedactionsisConsistentwiththeimpactsanalyzedundertheEISalternativesinthepastSEPAreview.Nonewmitigationmeasuresarerequiredbeyondthoseidentifiedinthe2015FEISand2015MitigationDocument,andtherearenosignificantunavoidableimpactsthatcannotbemitigated.CopiesareavailableforreviewatRentonCityHall,CustomerServiceCounter,6thfloor,1055SouthGradyWay,RentonWA98057,andontheCityofRentonwebsite(Rentonwa.gov).APPLICATIONNUMBER(S):LUAO9-151,EIS,ECF,BSP,SA-M,SM,DAPROJECTPROPONENT:CampbellMathewsonCenturyPacific,L.P.1201ThirdAye,Suite1680Seattle,WA98101PROJECTNAME:QuendallTerminalsDESCRIPTIONOFPROJECT:TheproposalislocatedadjacenttoLakeWashingtonon21.46acresofCommercial/Office/Residential(COR)zonedproperty.TheConsistencyAnalysiswiththeDraftEnvironmentalImpactStatement(DEIS)issuedDecember10,2010;evaluatespotentialimpactsresultingfromanewEnhancedAlternativeestablishedthroughaproposedDevelopmentAgreement.SimilartothePreferredAlternativetheEnhancedAlternativeisintendedtobeamixed-usedevelopment.TheEnhancedAlternativewouldcontain692residentialunits,42,190sq.ft.ofcommercialuses[retailandrestaurant],1,352parkingspacesand12.9acresofparks/openspace.ThefollowingelementsoftheenvironmentareaddressedinthisConsistencyAnalysis:Earth,CriticalAreas,EnvironmentalHealth,Energy/GreenhouseGases,LandandShorelineUse,Aesthetics/Views,ParksandRecreation,CulturalResources,Transportation,Height,andBulkandScale.LOCATIONOFPROPOSAL:4350LakeWashingtonBlvdLEADAGENCY:CityofRentonEnvironmentalReviewCommitteeDepartmentofCommunity&EconomicDevelopmentPlanningDivisionRESPONSIBLEOFFICIAL:EnvironmentalReviewCommitteeDepartmentofCommunity&EconomicDevelopmentPlanningDivision10555GradyWayRenton,WA98057
ERCISSUANCE&AVALABILITY/ENVIRONMENTALIMPACTSTATEMENTCONSIST&NCYANAYSISPAGE2of2DOCUMENTPURCHASEINFORMATION:TheEISConsistencyAnalysisisavailableforpurchasefromtheFinanceDepartmentonthe1stFloorofRentonCityHallfor$10perhardcopy,plustaxandpostage(ifmailed)orcanbedownloadedforfreefromtheCityofRentonwebsite,Rentonwa.gov.PUBLICREVIEW:Nonewmitigationmeasuresarerequiredbeyondthoseidentifiedinthe2015FEISand2015MitigationDocument,andtherearenosignificantunavoidableimpactsthatcannotbemitigated.ThereisnocommentperiodorappealperiodforthisConsistencyAnalysisandtherearenonewsignificantunavoidableimpactsthatcannotbemitigatedbytheexistingenvironmentaldocuments.ADDITIONALINFORMATION:Ifyouwouldlikeadditionalinformation,pleasecontactVanessaDolbee,CityofRentonat(425)430-7314orvdolbee@rentonwa.govPUBLICATIONDATE:March24,2017DATEOFDECISION:March20,2017SIGNATURES:3/2p)17/?GreggZimmranministratorRickM.Marshall,AdministratorPublicWorksDe1irtmentDateFire&EmergencyServicesDate_____________-t7.U___KellyBeymer,Administrator/1C.E.“Chip”Vincent,AdministratorCommunityServicesDepartmentDateDepartmentofCommunity&DateEconomicDevelopment
—CITYOF—‘Renton0OFISSUANCEANDAVAILABILITYENVIRONMENTALIMPACTSTATEMENTCONSISTENCYANALYSISPOSTEDTONOTIFYINTERESTEDPERSONSOFANENVIRONMENTALACTIONPROJECTNAME:QUENDALLTERMINALSPROJECTNUMBER:LUAO9-151,EIS,ECF,BSP,SA-M,SM,DALOCATION:4350LakeWashingtonBlvd.,Renton,WADESCRIPTION:TheproposalislocatedadjacenttoLakeWashingtonon21.46acresofCommercial/Office/Residential(COR)zonedproperty.TheConsistencyAnalysiswiththeDraftEnvironmentalImpactStatement(DEIS)issuedDecember10,2010,evaluatespotentialimpactsresultingfromanewEnhancedAlternativeestablishedthroughaproposedDevelopmentAgreement.SimilartothePreferredAlternative,theEnhancedAlternativeisintendedtobeamixed-usedevelopment.TheEnhancedAlternativewouldcontain692residentialunits,42,190sq.ft.ofcommercialuses[retailandrestaurant],1,352parkingspacesand12.9acresofparks/openspace.ThefollowingelementsoftheenvironmentareaddressedinthisConsistencyAnalysis:Earth,CriticalAreas,EnvironmentalHealth,Energy/GreenhouseGases,LandandShorelineUse,Aesthetics/Views,ParksandRecreation,CulturalResources,Transportation,Height,andBulkandScale.NOTICEISHEREBYGIVENunderWAC197-11-510andRMC4-9-070thattheEnvironmentalImpactStatementConsistencyAnalysis(EnvironmentalConsistencyAnalysis)fortheproposaldescribedbelowwasissuedbytheCityofRentonEnvironmentalReviewCommitteeon(ERC)Monday,March20,2017,andisavailableforpublicreview.TheERChasdeterminedthattheproposedactionsisConsistentwiththeimpactsanalyzedundertheEISalternativesinthepastSEPAreview.Nonewmitigationmeasuresarerequitedbeyondthoseidentifiedinthe2015FEISand2015MitigationDocument,andtherearenosignificantunavoidableimpactsthatcannotbemitigated.CopiesareavailableforreviewatRentonCityHall,CustomerServiceCounter,6thfloor,1055SouthGradyWay,RentonWA98057,andontheCityofRentonwebSite).DOCUMENTPURCHASEINFORMATION:TheEISConsistencyAnalysisisavailableforpurchasefromtheFinanceDepartmentonthe1stFloorofRentonCityHallfor$10perhardcopy,plustaxandpostage(ifmailed)orcanbedownloadedforfreefromtheCityofRentonwebsite,Rentonwa.gov.PUBLICREVIEW:Nonewmitigationmeasuresarerequiredbeyondthoseidentifiedinthe2015FEISand2015MitigationDocument,andtherearenosignificantunavoidableimpactsthatcannotbemitigated.ThereisnocommentperiodorappealperiodforthisConsistencyAnalysisandtherearenonewsignificantunavoidableimpactsthatcannotbemitigatedbytheexistingenvironmentaldocuments.FORFURTHERINFORMATION,PLEASECONTACTTHEPROJECTMANAGER,VANESSADOLBEEAT(425)430-7314.DONOTREMOVETHISNOTICEWITHOUTPROPERAUTHORIZATIONPLEASEINCLUDETHEPROJECTNUMBERWHENCALLINGFORPROPERFILEIDENTIFICATION.IIFYOUHAVEANYQUESTIONS,PLEASECONTACTVANESSADOLBEEAT(425)430-7314;ORVIAEMAILATVDOLBEE@RENTONWA.GOV.
APR 3, 2017 - CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING - MOTION SHEET
Agenda
Placement
Agenda Section Title/Item Motion Staff Contact Interested Parties
5.a) PUBLIC MEETING Bradley Annexation, A-16-001 COUNCIL CONCUR
TO AUTHORIZE THE
CIRCULATION OF
AN ALTERNATIVE
PETITION TO ANNEX
AND REQUIRE
ACCEPTANCE OF
THE CITY'S ZONING
AND ASSUMPTION
OF PROPORTIONAL
SHARE OF THE
CITY'S EXISTING
INDEBTEDNESS
Angie Mathias Chip Vincent
Judith Subia
8.a) CONSENT
AGENDA
Approval of Council Meeting minutes of March 27, 2017. COUNCIL CONCUR Jason Seth Megan Gregor
Sandi Weir
8.b) CONSENT
AGENDA
AB - 1880 Administrative Services Department
recommends adopting the 2017 Carry-Forward Budget
ordinance amending appropriations in the amount of
$67,570,325, the total amended budget to be $543,278,619
for the 2017/2018 Biennium; and approve the resolution
amending the 2017-2018 Fee Schedule.
REFER TO FINANCE
COMMITTEE
Jan Hawn Jamie Thomas
Hai Nguyen
8.c) CONSENT
AGENDA
AB - 1881 Community & Economic Development
Department recommends consolidating the public hearing
process, for the Quendall Terminals proponents, for both
the land use entitlements and the development agreement
and deferring this process to the City's Hearing Examiner.
COUNCIL CONCUR Vanessa Dolbee Chip Vincent
Judith Subia
8.d) CONSENT
AGENDA
AB - 1879 Community Services Department requests
approval to waive $26,640 in fees for park & shelter rentals,
parking garage passes, and permit fees for community
events happening in 2017. Council Concur.
COUNCIL CONCUR
TO APPROVE THE
CONSENT AGENDA
AS PRESENTED
Carrie Nass Roberta Graver