Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMisc 6Sandhu Sensitive Areas Clearing/Grading Violation from 2003, L02CG408 Parcel numbers 6199600320 and 6199600282. Filled/cleared 1.39 acres of 6.3 acre site containing wetland and wetland buffer. County required restoration of around 15,000 sq ft of Class 2 wetland buffer area on two parcels. Split rail fence also required. Gravel construction access pad to be removed. Culvert to be installed. Required Sensitive Areas "Notice on Title" for each parcel appear to be originals and have never been recorded. Wetland consultant's proposal (B-Twelve) calls for 3 years of monitoring of restoration area. Success standards are 90% survival of all planted vegetation at the end of year 3. 80°/o herbaceous cover within the seeded buffer areas at the end of year 3. Maximum 10% coverage of non-native or other invasives (scotts broom, blackberry). Plantings assumably installed in fall of 2003, however, fence never has been installed to date. Bond amount (initial) $14,777.83 (Make copy of plans for Bob MacOnie to map wetlands.) tQ King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5212 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 www.metrokc.gov September 16, 2008 Jennifer Henning Planning Manager City of Renton RE: Critical Area Mitigation at parcel 6199600320 (performance bond A03BN352) Sub: File Transfer to City of Renton due to Annexation Jennifer: Enclosed is the critical area mitigation monitoring file for the referenced parcel. The project was required under KC Clearing and Grading permit L02CG408 with an approved plan dated 7/1/03. From my understanding this parcel was included in the Benson Hill Annexation this past March. This file is now under City of Renton jurisdiction. Following is a brief summary of the project history and status. According to our records the critical area mitigation project was partially implemented but never finished by the (previous) owner Mr. Sandhu. The plantings were inspected on 10/12/04 and approved for installation however the required critical area buffer fence installation was still outstanding. Some time in 2006 Mr. Sandhu sold the property and never completed the fence installation or negotiated a bond transfer with the new owner. KC DDES still holds a Critical Area bond under number A03BN352. Carol Rogers in the DDES Financial Guarantee Management Unit (206-296-7250) will coordinate the bond issues with you. Unfortunately KC, could not release Mr. Sandhu of his responsibilities as they were not completed, and we do not have the jurisdictional authority now to coordinate with the new owner of the property or require mitigation completion from them. From my understanding there is active construction occurring by the new owner which may be under Renton permits. Jennifer Henning September 16, 2008 Page 2 We have directed Mr. Sandhu to coordinate with you in the future based on his responsibilities under the Critical Area performance bond. If you have any questions as I imagine you might after reviewing the file, you are welcome to contact me at 206-296-6764. Thank you. Lisa Brandt Environmental Scientist DDES, Critical Areas Cc Carol Rogers DDESFGMU Brandt, Lisa From: Sent: To: Subject: Ramon, Brandt, Lisa Wednesday, November 15, 2006 1 :57 PM Locsin, Ramon A03BN352 Sandhu -L02CG40S A few years back you inspected the plant installation on this project and commented that the fence would still need to be installed. Plants look great, Sandhu sold property and wants to transfer the bond to have the new owner build fence later down the road. I would like your advice on marking the mitigation buffer. At this time a silt fence is up (and very over grown with blackberry etc.) on the Wetland Boundary not the buffer boundary. I am concerned if they are not required to better identify the wetland buffer at this time of transfer the new owner could end up with a clearing violation down the road. What are your thoughts? At this point the plantings look great and other than the fence the bond could be released. But based on the fence, I am thinking of having the new owner post a bond at 50% of the original 14K bond to ensure they pay attention and also to ensure fence will get installed. Please let me know what you think. Lisa 1 : 03/16/2007 INSPECT '08/10/2007 '1NSPECT ;0?11s12007 SUBVAR 08/07/2007 Thursday, Jan 15, 2009 03:34 PM User: carlsonj Computer: DE242927 Os: Windows NT Version: 5.1 ·@ King Ct1unty Department of Oevel-0pmcnt and En~·ironmcntal Ser-vices 900 Oake,Liale Av,nui:: SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Financial Guarantee Activity No. ---"A'-'0-"3"B"-N"'3"'5-"2 _______ _ Name of Project Sandhu Location/ Address of Project 12044 SE 184" Street Project No. L02CG408 ------------------ SURETY BOND Bond No. LC0860 Bond Amount c--=-$1'---4'-'-,7'.-7'-'8'----,-,_-~---- Contractors Bonding and We __ K_u_l_w_a_n_t_S_. _s_a_n_dh_u __________ ,, as Principal and Insurance Company a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of _ __;W::;a:;s:;h::;lc;·n"'g,_t::;o:::n"-----and legally doing business in the State of Washington, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto King County, State of Washington, as Obligee, in the penal sum of Fourteen Thousand, Seven Hundred Seventy-eight and 0/100 dollars for the payment of which \1/e firmly bind ourselves, and our legal representatives, successors and assigns, jointly and severally. THE CONDITION OF OBLIGATION is that: l. The Principal has executed an "Agreement" entitled "Sensmve Area Restoration Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Under the provisions of the Agreement, the Principal is required to furnish a guarantee to secure the Principal's compliance with the terms of the Agreement. 3. This Surety Bond is intended to secure the Principals' performance of work and payment of fees in accordance with the associated Agreement. IT IS FURTHER EXPRESSLY PROVIDED that: I. Until written release of this obligation by King County, this bond may not be terminated or cancel1ed by the Principal or Surety for any reason. 2. The obligation of the Surety shall not be discharged or affected by any extension of time for the Principal's performance of this Agreement or by any amendment of the engineering plans used for construction of the project. The Surety hereby waives notice of any such extension or amendment. The obligation of the Surety shall, in no event, exceed the penal sum hereof unless the Surety has expressly consented to any change, modification or extension of the Agreement and has issued its written adjustment of the penal sum, signed by the Principal and Surety. 3. Upon failtrre of the Principal to perform any of the terms of the Agreement, 'The Surety shall either perform the terms of the Agreement or shall tender to the County the amount which the County estimates necessary to effect compliance with the terms of the Agreement. The County estimate may not be challenged or otherwise disputed by the Principal or Surety. Any funds provided by the Strrety in excess of that expended to remedy noncompliance with the Agreement will be returned to the Surety upon completion of the remedial work and payment of outstanding fees. 4. !n the event that this project becomes part of an incorporated area, King County may transfer its rights and obligations under this Surety Bond and the associated Agreement to any successor jmisdiction without notice to the Surety or Principal. The rights and obligations under this Surety Bond are for the exclusive benefit of King County. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, the rights and obligations of King CoWlty under this Surety Bond may not be assigned, hypothecated or transferred for any purpose. It is the APPLICANT'S/PRINCIPAL'S responsibility to notify King County of any change in address, phone number, or change of ownership of property. It is the APPLJCANT 1S responsibility to arrange for replacement of any/all financial guarantees prior to a change of ownership occurs. A03BN852 Page 2 of2 PRINCIPAL: Kulwant S. Sandhu 1~ s~ R~J....i3 Siznalure Date ',. S~TY: Ins/Jyan,c//Y,inpany ' . /,/ /// - /,;;{_/ .·.· /'(!~-,, 7/30/03 <4 I Signaturl' // Date Eric Sir5~n, Attorney-in-Fact Title Title 1 ">1 '?'/ SE I S-"f 9 L 2008 biAGBlR Girsle SE P.O. Box 9271 Mailing Addren Mqilini= Address Renton, WA 9805~ Seattle, WA 98109-0271 Phone Number (206) 628-7200 Phone ~umber PLEASE ATTACH A POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR SURETY AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING FOR THE PRINCIPAL StateofWashington,CountyofKing . . . \\ .A / . II·· /(p.;{i)• -r .J!,v11t/r,1/·~ I certify that I know or have seen satisfactory evi~e that L {il, v'f ... signed this instrument and acknowledges it to b/his/lier free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in ttlte..»Mfllltft9.nt. l_.-/ . " ,,, t·r1111~,,-t.""', \ . I ... ? (Notary s,a..t'' ..,._ .... ~~~ ' ,,\ Dated: __ _,:;,'--: _· ,_i_U:c:_' =-~-,-,---?"''>-' ____ _ ( ~= l Signature of Notary P~blic: /vUr.lf,v' I fj Vtf /;/) ~ :,. Pun,(, ~ :,,§ Ti.tie·. A ;1 , +-v()// I \-'>. "'.tc ,_flt/) ~t::>$ ~u I l -"t>, "1!~,~~,..§" 3 . / cl • u'S ~,,, OF W~I'\,,'' My appointment expires: __ .cc':c___-'--'-----------11111mu,o'' Financial Guarantee Activity Number:. ____________ _ SURETY.doc (10/99) A03BN352 Limited Power of Attorney Home Office: 1213 Valley Street PO Box 9271 Seattle, WA 98109-0271 (206) 628-7200 KNOW All MEN BY THESE PRESENTS ltlal CONTRACTORS BONOlNG AND INSURANCE COMPArff. a corporation duly orga,ized and existing under the laws of !tie State of Washington, and having its pnncipal office in Seattle, King County, Washington, does by these presents make, cons1ilute cn:l appJint ERIC S1RK1N, of Seattle. WashinglOn, its true and lawful Attomey-in-Foct wilh fun pc,i¥8f and authority hereby conferred io its na-ne. place and stead, to execute, acknowledge and deliver on !Jehatf of tile Company any and all oonds a'ld undertakings of suretyship given for any purpose, provided, however, ltlal no Attorney-in-Fact shall be autho<ized to execute a1d deliver any t:ond or undertaking that shal obliqale the Company fof" any portion of lhe penal sum thereof in excess of $6,000,000, and provK!ed, further, that no Attorney-in-Fact shall have the authority Lo issue a bid or prop:)Sal bond for any project where, if a contract is awarded, any bond or undertaking would be required with a penal sum in excess of $6,000,()(X); and to bind the Company thereby as fully .3ld lo the same extent as if such ~:mds were signed by the President sealed with the corporate seal of the C.ompany and duly attested by its Secretary; hereby ratifying aid cmfirming all that the said Attomey-in.foct may do in the premises. Said appointment is made under and by aulhority of Iha following A!SOlutions i:DOpted by the Boat! of Directors oflhe CONTRACTORS BONDING ANO INSURANCE COMPANY on September 8, 1998: RESOLVED that the President of the Compa,y is authorized lo sppoinl any person as the Company's true and lawful Attorney-in-Fact wilh p:,we, Md authority to execute illd deliver on behalf of the Company any and aH bonds and undertakings of surelyship given ftlr any purpose, subjed to such limits as shall be detennined by the President of the Company; provided, however, that oo such peraon shall ba authorized to execi.te and deliver any bond oc undertaking that $hall ooligate lhe Company for any poroon of the penal sum 1hereof in excess of S 10,0CI0,000. Md ~. further, that no AOOl'lley-in-Fa::t shall have the aulhority to issue a hid et proposa 000d for a,y project where, if a contract is awcl'ded, any bond or undertaking would be required with penal sum in excess of $10,COO.OOO. RESOLVED FURTHER that the authority of the Secretay of the Company 10 certify the authenticily and effectiveness of the foregoing resolution in any Limited Power of Attorney is hereby delegated to lhe following persons, !he signature of My of the following to bind the Company with respect to the aJtllentidty and effectiveness of the foregoing resolutions as if signed Dy the Secretary of the Company: Oonat:t Sirtin, Steven A Gaines. John Pieprzny, John 0. Minto. La,-y A. Byeis, Chris Reburn. Mane Noma. April Rohrer. and Brian Schick. RESOLVED FURTHER that the signatures (including certification that the Power of Attorney is still in l'orce and effect} of the President Notaty Public and person certifying aulhenticity and effectiveness, .m the corpaate ald Notay seals appearing on cr,y Limited Power of Attorney containing this ~ the foregoing resolutions as well as the Limited Power of Attorney itself and its transmission, may be by fa:;simile; and such limited Power of Attorney shall be deemed an original in all aspects. RESOLVED FURTHER that aU resolutioos adopted poor to today aplX)inting the above named as Attorney-in-Fact for CONTRACTORS BONDING ANO INSURANCE COMPANY are hereby superseded. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CONTRACTORS BONDING AND INSURANCE COMPANY has ca.ised these presents to be signed by its President and its COIJ)Orate seal lo be hereto affixed this 18th day of June, 2002. CONTRACTORS BONDING ANO INSURANCE COMPANY 8yc Steven A Gaines. President STATE OF WASHINGTON-COUNTY OF KING On this 18th day of June. 2002, personally appeared STEVEN A. GAINES, to me known lo be Irle President of the corporation that executed the foregoing Limited Power of Attorney and acknowledged said Limited Power of Attorney to be the free a1CI voluntary ~ and deed of said COfpOl'ation, for the uses Md purposes therein mentioned, aod on oath stated that he is authorized lo execute the sad Limited Power of Attorney. _ ... _ ........... HU'',,, ..:--..:, ":-..... ~1, • IN WITNESS VYHEREOF. I have hereunto set my hand and ~xec my cffici21 seal the: day and year firs! above written. .:" N •.• ··,;101,/ i{•."",>, 1t : 0 ;',$-~ -r..-•. -s. ,, : .t'i! tlOTARyl,·~ \ ~ !u -Cl): ~ \ \ ~ / j ,.~;:;.. .. 1 .. 9~~..... J' •, ·c,· ••••••• -'~, CF'w. ----,, .................... -- The undersigned, acting un<ler authority the Board of Directors of CONTRACTORS BONDING AND INSURANCE COMPANY, hereby certifies, as or in lieu of Certificate of the Secretay of CONTRACTORS BON DJ NG AND INSURANCE COMPANY, that the aboYe and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the Original Power of Attorney issued by said Company, &'Id does hereby further cenify tl'lat the said Power of Attorney is still in force and effect. GIVENundermyhaada,t ___ .:;:_Se-=a=t..:t..:l..:e2.,_:_Wc:_A:.._ __ .~;, ___ 3=-0::..::th:..:._ __ dayo,f_ -----=Jc.:u::.l:,y _____ ,20__2L_. PoaES01.11-US061802 ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 SENSITIVE AREA RESTORATION Apilicant•s Name and Address J iriJ f w ·tw uJj{t;Jui{) AGRBBMBNT AGREEMENT Number Project/Permit Number and Name A03BN352 L02CG408 -Sandhu Guarantee Amount Site Location/Section $1.4, 779 12044 SB 184ti. Street This AGREEMENT is made and entered into this~ day of ~~J/7J ~~~~~~~~~~~' 20..!.3,, (Effective date) between the King Counqy-D"';partment of Development and Environmental Services, hereinafter called the COUNTY, and the above named applicant, hereinafter called APPLICANT. All references in this AGREEMENT to the APPLICANT shall include the APPLICANT and its successors and assigns. All references in this AGREEMENT to the COUNTY shall include King County and its successor political jurisdictions. ~asis for AGRBBMBNT:I WHEREAS the undersigned APPLICANT seeks to record the above-referenced subdivision or obtain issuance of the above-referenced permit; and WHEREAS the COUNTY will permit recording of the subdivision or issuance of the permit upon agreement by the APPLICANT to, among other requirements for this project, complete all terms of this AGREEMENT; NOW THEREFORE, the APPLICANT hereby agrees and binds itself and its legal representatives, successors, and assigns, as follows: Terms of the AGRBEMENT: 1. The APPLICANT shall fully install all sensitive area and/or buffer mitigation measures required pursuant to the above referenced Project/Permit by the time specified by the COUNTY, (unless approved in writing by DOES) . Installation shall be in accordance with the approved sensitive area and/or buffer mitigation plan including any approved amendments or extensions thereto, and in conformance with applicable COUNTY ordinances, standards, and specifications. All improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Director of DOES or his/her designee. 2. The APPLICANT shall fulfill all other requirements of King County Code 21A.24 and other Codes and regulations applicable to the project, even if these requirements are not set forth in this AGREEMENT. 3. The COUNTY must approve (in writing) any APPLICANT proposed change of work from the approved plans prior to beginning such work. 4. Prior to beginning construction, a pre-construction conference shall be held with the COUNTY, the APPLICANT and the APPLICANT'S contractor(s). 5. The APPLICANT shall be responsible for costs of any corrective work on or off the site to the extent that such corrective measures are associated with work performed and/or not completed. 6. The APPLICANT shall implement all necessary erosion-sedimentation measures/facilities to ensure sediment-laden water does not enter natural or human- made drainage facilities and will maintain them until such time as erosion potential is past. In the event erosion and sedimentation is observed and upon written notice by King County, the APPLICANT shall immediately take corrective actions to prevent erosion on or off the site. 7. The APPLICANT shall notify the COUNTY in writing upon installation of the mitigation plan measures. Within 60 days after COUNTY inspection approves mitigation installation, the APPLICANT shall submit as-built drawings, and shall thereafter submit monitoring reports by or before October 31st in every year following. A03BNS -~) Sensitive Area Restoration Agreement Page 2 8. The APPLICANT shall perform monitoring and maintenance as set forth in the mitigation plan so as to create healthy growing conditions for three years after the COUNTY approves installation. If the project site does not meet the performance standards established in the mitigation plan, the COUNTY may extend the monitoring period until those performance standards have been met. 9. Prior to the COUNTY' s approval and authorization of construction, the APPLICANT shall post a financial guarantee in the above amount and in a form approved by the COUNTY to guarantee compliance with all terms of this AGREEMENT. The financial guarantee shall remain in force and effect until written release by the COUNTY. The APPLICANT' s obligation to perform work and pay fees and other amounts is not limited to the amount of the associated financial guarantee. 10. Any failure on the part of the APPLICANT to proceed with due diligence and in good faith in the construction, maintenance, and/or monitoring work provided herein shall, upon notice by the COUNTY, constitute a default of the terms of this AGREEMENT. 11. The APPLICANT shall reimburse the COUNTY for all direct and indirect costs necessitated by this AGREEMENT, including but not limited to plan review and inspection fees pursuant to Title 27 of the King County Code, hourly monitoring and inspection fees pursuant to Title 27.02.080, and corrective action or abatement. 12. The APPLICANT hereby grants the COUNTY the right to enter and inspect the project site, and, in the event of any failure to perform terms of this AGREEMENT, to implement such corrective measures as the COUNTY deems necessary. 13. The obligations to install, maintain, and monitor the mitigation measures set forth in the mitigation plan shall run with the land. 14 . The APPLICANT shall be responsible for the proper performance, safe conduct and adequate policing and supervision of the project. This responsibility shall not be lessened or otherwise affected by the COUNTY' s review of plans, specifications, or work, or by the presence at the work site of the COUNTY's representative(s}, or by the compliance by the APPLICANT with any requests made by said repreaentative(sl. 15. The APPLICANT shall indemnify and hold the COUNTY and its agents, employees and/or officers harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense all claims, damages, suits at law or equity, actions, penalties, losses, or costs of whatsoever kind or nature, brought against the COUNTY arising out of, in connection with, or incident to the execution of this AGREEMENT and/or the APPLICANT'S performance or failure to perform any aspect of the AGREEMENT. Provided, however, that nothing herein shall require the APPLICANT to hold harmless or defend the COUNTY from any claim arising from the sole negligence of the COUNTY'S agents, employees and/or officers. 16. In the event that any party deems it necessary to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any right or obligation under this AGREEMENT, the parties hereto agree that any such action or proceeding shall be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction situated in King County, Washington. 17. This Agreement shall remain in effect and the associated financial guarantee shall not be released until three years after installation is approved by the COUNTY and performance standards set forth in the mitigation plan have been met to the satisfaction of the Director of DOES or his/her designee. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT as of the day and year first above written. ~~LrCANT I~ r !'ru.A TITLE, __ ~O~· Llf/~~i'.W:v=~--- DATE, '?-& 0 2 Received ACTIVITY NUMBER A03BN352 OFJlEYENUE·:· . ~ ..... n~.'1'~;.~ . · W~ro,, STA~ REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX AFFJDA VJT This fonn is your receipt riEASE J'.YrE OR:,'f'RlNT CHAPTER 82.45 RCW -CHAPTER 458-61 WAC when stamped by cashier. . .,:THIS AFF1DA VIT WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS ALL AREAS O:'tl ALL PAGES ARE ruu.v COMl"LETED nCh~li;bo~ jfn•"'a!salcof- (See back jlllge for instructiom) ... ~ G_;i~ ~oh~,'.~ssor trustee . i:.:: :(Greel1WOO_d107:fklLC,grentoru008fdeedoftiu~) ~~ . Mailii;i~ A~ress 9725 ThinfAvenue N.E., Sui1e 600 ~g Ci~tatdZip -~~-~.WA~115+2060 .flh:mc t{o. (i~uding ~-rca coii~) !~$!~1925 lfmultinlc owners. list ""n:cntaae of owaersbi nut to name . • Name Nickerson Street Associates. LLC w ~ ~ Mailing Addresii 5701 First Avenue South ~ ~ City/State/Zip Seattle, WA 98108 Phone No. (including area .:ode) (206) 298-2077 List all real and pe™lnal ~ ta.; parcel a.xounl numbers -check box if personal property List asse!ISed value{s) $250,000 N•-+------~~-e'----+---F---.-- Mailing Ad~ -+--+-+-+----;-~-----+---· City/State/Zip -~---.---~--+--~------e~-+- 619960-0262-04 D 619960-0320-oa D $600,000 Phone No. {with arc:a:~i _;:,.)· n ,· ·:~· II Street addn:u ofprope~. 12044 S.~_.-.11~; Ren~;~ 98058 \._, Thi• property is loc11ed in"t]uninc~Jl~>ntccf / '.:., / CO\ll'ltyOR wilhinE(cil)'ofcRo="""'=~--- 0 Check bmt if any o(thc IUl~--~ls an: tii;ng ~ga~d -~ a ~~i\· Legal dcscriplion of propeny (ir more a~ce it -~dcd, -~~u ~ a~ a ~ 0 arate sheet to each page of}_?c affidavil) See Schedule A En1er Abstract Use Categories: _1•~-------"c.f---- (Plcase see list on t~J:iack page or this form) Ir exempt from ~rt}, la\per cbapler 84.36 RCW (nonprofit organization), incll!Se: ·· iLlst all ~~j"pro~ (tan,g~e and intangible) included in selling ·:t?,r.!t;i~_:_ ~S<~ll~"c'•~E:='.'.".~p~<~R~i~~CN'.:'.'.'.o.0, ============'-----I ·:·\, .. ,,., ... .'" .-.,:. ·-.. YES NO Ir claiming.!~ ui~P~:n, list YjAC nu~-ber;~nd. rfason for exemption: ls1hisprope11y~as.A-;lalldJchapter84.33RCW? D El ., ... ,,. f $::; .:'·····'·:: 4 ca r::','A.L,41 _./ ls1his~clasii.lmas.amml::USC(~sp,::e,fannand O IZ] WAC No. (Section/ _:Ub~tio~}·_ ~==,. .. ~~--~=-'-'c.'.-------- agriculllnl,orfin!bcr) lan4'pc:r~MJ4? Reason for exemptiol'J. ls this popeny ~ving-~ial ~:"as historical property D 0 pcrchaplc:r84,i6 ~ ,• .. mazy~im:y~{~asinsffuctrif~:·-:::: (I) N011C,E:Of:coirmNbANC1f~LAND·Oll.aJRmNl'l.5E) NEW oWNE.R(S):. To oontinuc )lie ~t ¥slgpation:as forest land or classification a§~ use(. ~e, rarfu anl;i aariSWture, <U'timber) ~=:::::2:·:i~~;.:1~~=- lfthe land no longer qualifies oryl)U do j;ot wjlih to c;Clfltiri1J1: IJw: designtJ.lion or-clas!iificatian, it will be mnov~.and ~-,r;:dmpen.!/lti~lg or ~-~onal taxes will be due and payable by the seller or transferor ~·11x: time Qf5'le. (RCW .. 84.33.140 or RCW 84.34.108). Pricit.~ signing(~ bo~, )'.C)u ~--~ ·· your local county assessor for more iii~~ · ' · · This hmd O does O does not q~ify'fur co~nu4ce. DEPUTY ASSESSOR DATE (2) NOTKEOFCOMPUANCE(HIS1'0Rlk_PRO~/ NEW OWNER(S): To continue special w.luation as hltrs:Jrit!'Jll'owtY, sip (J) below. If the new ownel"(s) do not wish to continue., all · additional tax calculated pursuanl to chapter 84.26 RCW, shall 1-. due and payable by the seller or tnmsferor at the time of sale. (3) OWNER(S) SIGNATURE Transfer of property u~~url{by:~,t~··s sala; copy al recorded Deed of Truat Is attached) -,,.-,:.)·: Type of Document _T_.....,. __ ,_oeea_~~-,----------- Date ofDocument _1c1c/3/0=B~---------------- Gross Sellins Price s ____________ _ •Personal Property (deduct) $, ____________ _ Exemption Claimed (deduct) $ ____________ _ Taxable Selling Price 0.00 Excise Tax: State S, ____________ o_._oo_ Selectlocation Local S 0.00 ·~1i~·gucnt Interest: Stale $. ____________ _ ._:Q.OQlltl :-·.-J Local $. ___________ _ .~Deli~Cju~t Penalty $ ____________ _ _ .:~c~~nty i~~-~~~-Ti;i_gy Fee $ ____________ _ :'State.Technolon.fe_e $, ____________ _ •iffidl!,~;~··pf.ocessi~~ F~~-·:~------------- 1:9~.1 Due ~~. ---------~'•c·cOO~ A J1N1~M 0~ s1~.oo 1s·oQ.E"·iN'F'Hcs1 AND/OR TAX .. •SEE JNSTKUCTIONS-:, F PEIUURY TIIAT 'lffl1:f0REG0IN(f IS riUE ~NJfrORRECT. ~== ;r Girl~~~ AiL ·<:1;./ PAGI-Nt OF N1 TRUSTEE'S SALE GUARANTEE SCHEDULE A .,,.__., ./ .-~-~.;: Lot\;5_. Blo9~{ 2/ Nor'th~~ter~-,-~G~.~de:r-{ Tracts, Division Number 6, accor'dif,l;g,..-to 1?he plat ~:her~~, _.fec:grded in volume 46 of Plats, page 100, in King .-toun,ty, washi-frg·t()n; ./ EXCEPT the \ti¢st .:3 00 !~et :-fhefeof.J AND that porfl-qft of }:he _._iou.~he~,it .. cfii.·art·~·r of th'~ \{brthwest quarter of Section 33, Town_Ship/23/Nor_th/ Ran~.~ 5 ·:JEast,{~ ... ~., in King County, washington/.-.. _lyfng,._:bet#e~ii. tl}e· easterly ~nd westerly lines of Bonneville Transmissiml J;,.ine,-.:Ri~ht".':Of-Way,/ as::·· de:s·cribed in instrument recorded undef._._Kihg ::Couiity Rec'6'rding.)1umbe:r .... 317B820, and lY,j.ng between the north 1.frf~ of L6~. 1=t and .ihe /lso4.t:h 1:t"~l"e: ... of Lot/1·~-- B,l"ciC~. 2, Northwestern Garden Ti..~cts··;··· 6i~is.Jon ,._llumb~.r ,,6.,,. ari<;ordil;i~ t;b the plat:: thereof recorded in vohime 46/of.iPla,ts, pag/i, i'go, \in i(ingi :County, Washington, extended east·er-i.y·:· · :· ·····'·""'·······.,, .... ,,· :: / ~- i Pa.-f:Jl. B, i: '' :' .C i ·' 0't 1} Bl9ck 2, Northwestern Garden Tracts, Divi.sioI).. Nui,e,{''6,// .accoiding;· to the plat thereof recorded in Volume····:.j;f-.iof .-:·Pl_?its,./page . ./100,/ in J(i:qg····cbup.ty, Washington. ····.,,,, •................ _,_ .... ··· .,.,,·-'ENJ;). OF SCHEDULE A King County Property Description for parcel number 6199600282 Page I of2 ml mlllln KCGIS Parcel Reports Property Report Districts and Development Conditions Report Find Your Council District Find Your Watershed KCGIS Center King County GIS Center King Street Center 201 S. Jackson St. Suite 706 Seattle, WA 98104 giscenter@kingcounty.gov + 47.59909 N -122.33136 W + 47' 35' 56.72" -122" 19' 52.90" HOME NEWS SERVlCES DJRECTORY CONTACT Search KCGIS Center www.KingCounty.gov/GIS Assessor information for parcel number 6199600282 Taxpayer name Mailing address SANDHU PROPERTY LLC 27013 PACIFIC HWY S #353 DES MOINES WA 98198 Parcel number 6199600282 Tax Account number 619960028204 ~E;!yY code 2128 Jurisdiction RENTON _ ~resent us~------_ Vacant(Sin.gle-family) !',ppraised value $250,000 -~L"e,,g=a,1_ d=-e=-s=-c"r"ipc..cti"o~n'------------~-- NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRS DtV NO 6 TRACT 5 LESS W 300 FT TGW 250 FT R/W ACROSS SE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SEC 33-23-05 LY S OF N LN OF TRACT 4 & N OF S LN OF TRACT 7 PROD ELY • SUBJ TO TRANS LN ESMT Sales/Quit ClaimsfTransfers Sale date Sale Buyer Seller Excise Recording Instrument Sale price tax number typo reason number ------------------------------,_ 11-03-2008 $0 NICKERSON KROHN GARY 2369982 20081104000786 Trustees' None STREET Deed ASSOCIATES LLC 08-30-2005 $1,050,000 SANDHU SANDHU ?l5.~2.1.9 .iQQ5090_1_002_79Q Statutory None PROPERTY KULWANT Warranty LLC S+SANTOKH K Deed 05-21-1997 $112,200 SANDHU PAYMENT 1545054 199705221296 Statutory None KULWANT LAWRENCE Warranty S+SANTOKH B+GERALDINE Deed K G Parcel description Property name Plat NORTHWESTERN GARDEN Water WATER name TRACTS DIV NO. 06 Property R • RESIDENTIAL Plat 2 type-------block Platlot 5 Present use Lot area T axa bl Tax year 2009 2008 2007 2006 Vacant(Single------·-· ---fam!IY} ____________ _ 187,743 sq. Q-S-T-NW-33-23-5 R ft.J~.31 a~~~l _ e va ue h" t 1s orv Tax status Taxable value reason Appraised value TAXABLE NONE OR UNKNOWN $250,000 (land) + iQ (improvements) $250,000 (total) TAXABLE NONE OR UNKNOWN $224,000 (land) + .lQ (improvements) $224,000 (total) TAXABLE NONE OR UNKNOWN $204,000 (land) + lQ (improvements) $204,000 (total) TAXABLE NONE OR UNKNOWN $197,000 (land) + lQ (improvements) $197,000 (total) Related resources _ ~~te~ _ DISTRICT Sewer NONE OR _ system ____ -~~-~~Q~~---____ _ Access Street surface RESTRICTED GRAVEL ---------------· -------·-·- Taxable value $250,000 (land) + .SO. (improvements) $250,000 (total) $224,000 (land) + .SO. (improvements) $224,000 (total) $204,000 {land) + 1Q. (improvements) $204,000 (total) $197,000 (land) + SQ_ (improvements) $197,000 (total) King County Assessor: ~h-!!Jroi~ a _req1J!?'St to correct information in this report King County Assessor: eReal Pro_pfrrty _Repqrt (PDF formal requires Acrobat) http ://www5 .kingcounty. gov /kc gisreports/property _report.aspx?PIN=6199600282 12/12/2008 • King County Property Description for parcel number 6199600282 King County Assessor: Quarter Section Map (PDF format requires Acrobat) King County GIS: Property information FAQ Page 2 of2 King County GIS: Districts and Development Conditions Report (a detailed report about the location of this property) King County DOES: Purw,:l l'·.·~r,·'.:-a-i"'•', Pe;,mt (for unincorporated areas only) King County Treasury Operations: Property T~x lnforma.ti1:>1.1..for this property King County Recorders Office: Excise Tax Affidavits Report King County Recorders Office: Sr;~nneQ images of plats,. King County Recorders Office: S_~fl-~ed_ _images of surveys _and other map documents. Open iMAP to this property (requires a high speed internet connection) Open P~ucel Viewer to this propeD:y (any connection speed, but less features than iMAP) ------· ---------·--- Search: ~------- Address or parcel number: !Goll Reset I D search by condo name example address: 8621 428TH AVE SE I example parcel number· 0942000860 This report was generated on 12/12/2008 2:10:00 PM .l:i.QfTl.~ P...ri_y_,!gy I b-fressjt;,i,l,it,r l Ti;ffTE$_9LL!~ I S.E!arch Contact us at gisi.;.ente_r@~iDQGQl.,I_/J!Y&Q't, Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. © 2008 King County http ://www 5. kingcounty .gov /kc gisreports/property _report.aspx?PIN =6199600282 12/12/2008 Ki;,.g County Property Description for parcel number 6199600320 Page I of2 JL . . KCGIS Parcel Reports Property Report Districts and Development Conditions Report Find Your Council District Find Your Watershed KCGI S Center King County GIS Center King Street Center 201 S. Jackson St. Suite 706 Seattle, WA 98104 giscenter@kingcounty.gov + 47.59909 N -122.33136 W + 47° 35' 56.72" -122' 19' 52.90" HOP.1E NEWS SERVICES DIRECTORY CONTAC..I L-~-~------Search j KCGIS Center www.KingCounty.gov/GIS Assessor information for parcel number 6199600320 =..., prmt ~ Taxpayer name Mailing address SANDHU PROPERTY LLC 27013 PACIFIC HWY S #353 DES MOINES WA 98198 Address(es) at this None paf_(?el .. ·---------~--------- Legal description NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRS DIV #6 Sales/Quit Claims/Transfers Sale date Sale Buyer Seller price -----·· -··--· ····-···-·----· ------- 08-30-2005 $1,050,000 SANDHU SANDHU PROPERTY KULWANT ----- LLC S+SANTOKH K 05-21-1997 $112,200 SANDHU PAYMENT KULWANT LAWRENCE S+SANTOKH B+GERALDINE K G Parcel description Parcel number Tax Account number Le¥¥ code Jurisdiction Present use -~l:IP.~.ised value Excise Recording tax number number --------- 2152219 2005090100;?1.fill 1545054 199705221296 6199600320 619960032008 2128 RENTON Vacant(Single- lamily) $600,000 Instrument type Statutory Warranty Deed Statutory Warranty Deed Sale reason None None Property name Plat name NORTHWESTERN GARDEN TRACTS DIV NO. 06 Water system WATER DISTRICT Property type R. RESIDENTIAL Present Vacant(Slngle- Plat block 2 Sewer _system PRIVATE Access PUBLIC --------------------------·---· use _famUy) Plat lot 7 O·S·T· NW-33-23-5 street PAVED Lot area 85,377 sq. ft. (1.96 acres) R Taxable value historv Tax year Tax status Taxable value reason ----- 2009 TAXABLE NONE OR UNKNOWN 2008 TAXABLE NONE OR UNKNOWN 2007 TAXABLE NONE OR UNKNOWN 2006 TAXABLE NONE OR UNKNOWN Related resources ··-___ ,, ......... ~------- surface _______ ,, __ ,, ________ , __ ,,, -------· . _,,_,~ Appraised value Taxable value $6'(j'(i:i:1Clo (iari(i) --------- $600,000 (land) + SQ (improvements) + SQ (improvements) $600,000 (total) $600,000 (total) $457,000 (land) $457,000 (land) + SQ (improvements) + SQ (improvements) $457,000 (total) $457,000 (total) $416,000 (land) $416,000(land) + 11..000. (improvements) + S1.QQQ (improvements) $417,000 (total) $417,000 (total) $400,000 (land) $400,000 (land) + iLQQQ (improvements) + 11.QQQ (improvements) $401,000 (total) $401,000 (total) . ------------------- King County Assessor: Submit~ reql!esJ to correct information in this report King County Assessor: eRe~I Prope_rt)' _Rep~u1 (PDF format requires Acrobat) King County Assessor: Qu~rter Section Map (PDF format requires Acrobat) King County GIS: Property_ i_nfpr_m~tl!:m FAQ King County GIS: Di~J_r_i~ts 3'n_d Development Conditions Report (a detailed report about the location of this property) http ://www5 .king county. gov /kc gisreports/property _report.aspx?PIN=61996003 20 12/12/2008 ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Building Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TIY 206-296-7217 Alternative formats available upon request Drop-Off Cover Sheet for Building Services Division Return this form and related submittal items to the King County Building Services Division Permit Center. If you have any questions, please call 206-296-6600. This slip MUST accompany all submittals of additional information to King County Building Services Division. SUBMITIALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT THIS COMPLETED FORM. KING COUNTY TRACKING NUMBER: --:L==· -=O'--'Z==-..:,Cc...' .=C;,-.,.4....,0"---'-[""-------------- PROJECT NAME: _...:.>__c.,;{,j,1.:..c..>cd"-!..f-""-"'u',l.."--"-P-ro..::;_;,:.k-'"':r--"---'-~-7"F=-------------- ADDRESS OF PROJECT: __,_i=..Z_Nf.J...1-+--P"""'-----'-11....;g.,__y..,__T_-_"""?t"----'.~----------- ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO: r NAME: __ _u:...::..:._.:...:::+-+~~~----------------------- FIRM NAME:--'±1S~c ....\-JC~..:'..::(J[.~__!_+.L'S='...:Sc:::()::..c(:....' ___ PHONE NUMBER 2 ~3, /z cj -{)5 IS MAILING ADDRESS: ___L1 _rt-"3'---\J)~. u.m...µe..o.0=c=-·m ...:..........S'-l...t_CITY, ST & ZIP: ~ t'JU/1: 9! /) 3 ~ STATE THE SCOPE OF ANY CHANGES OR DEFINE THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THIS DOCUMENT. DOCUMENTS SUMITIED (LIST ALL DOCUMENTS AND THEIR QUANTITIES): ITEM QTY DESCRIPTION 1 4 Ni fi' er cch ~ + f-, v 4 rl~.,; ,P(cv,<-P /_;-::-.z-.. 11=.1 fl \\ /7 i-::::=..J .--- 2 ,I . ..J ~ It:;, ''"''' I' [I . ,, lr-· I l ,_ :......:: I 3 J -JUN 2 7 2003 ·~. -· 4 ------,-, 5 ~'l:io'<Jo &,l'o"-Jo!-•\,"'· 6 Check out the DOES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes BSD Drop-Off Form b-cvs-dropoff.pdf 05-19-03 Page 1 of 1 June 26, 2003 Mr. Ramon Locsin King County D.D.E.S. 900 Oakesdale Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 Re: Mitigation Plan Sandhu Property; No. L02CG408; Job #A2-125 Dear Ramon, B-twelve Associates, Inc. 1103 W. Meeker St. Ken1, WA 98032-5751 (v) 253-859-0515 (f) 253-852-4732 (e) info@b12assoc.com /....oUG,c/ce RECEIVED SITE DEVELOPMENT JUN 2 7 2C03 KING CO. 0.0.E.S. REVISION This letter responds to the County's letter to Mr. Sandhu, dated January 13, 2003. A site meeting was also held on March 19, 2003, to further discuss the impacts and mitigation associated with the grading violation on the site. Attached please find the following: l. B-twelve's Wetland & Buffer Mitigation Plan (Sheet W-1) 2. B-twelve's Wetland & Buffer Mitigation Plan Notes. After the Plan is approved by the County, these Notes will be placed on a plan sheet (24 x 36") and labeled Sheet W-2. 3. Sensitive Areas Bond Quantity Worksheet for planting, inspection, and monitoring costs. 4. Cover letter, Civil Engineering Plans and Specifications, and bond quantity worksheet, by Stiefel Engineering. The areas which appear to have been graded are shown on Sheet W-1, and in greater detail on the Engineering Plans (Sheet C.2). According to Stiefel Engineering, approximately 15,453 sf of buffer area was disturbed, including the dirt piles to the east and west of the channel in Wetland A/B/C. As agreed in the site meeting and in the subsequent emails, the following actions will be considered mitigation for the grading violation within sensitive areas. • Temporary erosion and sediment control measures will be put in place prior to the start of any grading work. • The dirt piles, including those located on each side of the wetland channel, will be regraded, and the areas restored to what was approximately pre- existing grade. • All graded or disturbed areas in the buffers and restored wetlands will be seeded with a native grass seed mix. • Re: Mitigation Plan Sandhu/No. L02CG408/Job #A2-125 B-twelve Associates June 26, 2003 Page 2 of2 • Native shrubs and grasses will be planted on both sides of the wetland channel. • All debris will be removed from wetland buffers, specifically in the buffer that is south of wetland flags Al-AS. • A wildlife-passable, split-rail fence with sensitive areas signs will be installed along the wetland buffers. According to the engineer, the area outside of sensitive areas that was disturbed by grading activity is approximately 27,425 sf. (See Civil Engineering Plans.) The limits of general cleanup, regrading, and erosion control work are shown on the Engineering plans. We believe that these mitigation measures will restore the site to its preexisting condition, and will make up for the temporary impacts that the disturbance may have had on the sensitive areas. The planted areas will help to filter runoff and provide wildlife habitat, and will also stabilize the area near the wetland channel, thus decreasing erosion. Please feel free to call or email me (darcey@b12assoc.com) if you have any questions or need any additional information. Sincerely, ·~·B.~ Darcey B. Miller Wetland Ecologist CC: Kulwant Sandhu Mark Stiefel, P.E. Fitec dm/ A2125-Sandhu/ A2125-KC-6-03.doc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Sen-ices Land Use Services Section 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Project No: L02CG408 Date: JULY 16, 2003 GRADING PERMIT CONDITIONS Permit Type: GRADE Sub Type: GRADING Title: SANDHU RESTORATION Description: REMOVAL OF FILL & RESTORATION OF WETLAND BUFFER Site Location: 12044 SE 184TH ST. Applicant: Address: Phone No.: RENTON, WA 98058 KULWANT SANDHU 13989 SE 159rn PL. RENTON, WA 98058 425 226-8328 Other Information: Owner's Name: Address: Phone No.: sps INSP:. RLOC Submitted: 12/02/2002 Date Issued: Expires: Parcel No.: 6199600320 SAME AS APPLICANT Please refer to the above Project NlUllber when making inquiries regarding this application. For Permit information or requests for inspections, call 206-296-6640. The conditions attached to this cover sheet apply to the permit referenced here. All conditions must be complied with by the contractor and verified by a Grading Inspector (Call 296-6640) or this permit will become null and void. King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Section 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Project L02CG408 Date: July 16, 2003 GRADING/ CLEARING PERMIT APPLICATION READY TO ISSUE NOTICE Applicant: Kulwant Sandhu Address: 13989 SE 159" Pl. Renton, WA 98058 Title: Owner's Name: Address: Description: Dear Applicant: Sandhu Restoration Kulwant Sandhu 13989 SE 159'" Pl. Renton, WA 98058 Removal of fill & restoration of Wetland buffer Submitted: 12/02/2002 Parcel No: 6199600320 SDS INSP.: RLOC Sub Type: GRADE Site Location: 12044 SE 184'• ST. Renton, WA 98058 This letter is to inform you tbat the above referenced permit application is deemed Ready to Issue as soon as tbe following checked items have been submitted: [X] Payment of balance of fees $1,518.00 [X] Signed "Grading/Clearing Permit" form. [X] Submittal of Financial Guarantees [X] Submittal of Recorded Sensitive Area Notice on Title. See the attached " instructions for submittal" sheet for more detailed information. If the above referenced permit application is not secured within 30 days from the date of this letter, this file will be considered withdrawn and a new application and filing fees will be required. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Ramon C. Locsin at 206 296-7151. w· . S~te Develt~t Specialist Cc: FGMU (If insurance, financial guarantees or PASA are required) 8-twelve Associates, Inc. 1103 W Meeker St Kent, WA 98032-5751 SANDHU PROPERTY WETLAND & BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN NOTES (to be Sheet W-2) MITIGATION PLAN CONCEPT (v) 253-859-0515 (f) 253-852-4732 (e) info@b12assoc.com The property owner proposes to restore the disturbed sensitive areas to the conditions which existed just before the violation activity, The proposed mitigation plan includes the following activities: • Temporary erosion and sediment control measures will be put in place before any grading work is begun. • The dirt piles, including those located on each side of the wetland channel, will be regraded, and the areas restored to what was approximately pre- existing grade. • All graded or disturbed areas in the buffers and restored wetlands will be seeded with a native grass seed mix. • Native shrubs and grasses will be planted on both sides of the wetland channel. • All debris will be removed from wetland buffers, specifically in the buffer that is south of wetland flags Al-AS. • A wildlife-passable, split-rail fence with sensitive areas signs will be installed along the wetland buffers. MITIGATION GOALS The goals of the mitigation are: • To restore disturbed areas of the buffer by regrading, planting native vegetation, and removing debris. • To protect the sensitive areas in the future, by filing a Notice on Title and constructing a fence with signage. • To meet the Standards of Success, outlined in the Monitoring Program below. MAINTENANCE PROGRAM Work to be completed on an annual basis includes: Re: Wetland & Buffer Mitigation Plan Sandhu Property/No. L02CG408/ Job #A2-125 B-twelve Associates J unc 26, 2003 Page 2 of3 1. Himalayan blackberry, Japanese knotweed, evergreen blackberry, reed canary grass, Scots broom, English ivy, morning glory, or other invasive species should be controlled by hand within the sensitive areas. 2. Replace dead or failed plant material after the annual monitoring report has specified which plants have not survived. Replacement species are to be of the same species, size and location as original plantings. Plantings are to be installed during the dormant period (late October through mid-March). 3. Remove tree staking and guy wires from all trees after one year. The Owner will conduct all items listed in the Maintenance Work Scope on an annual basis. Additional work may be required per the Monitoring Report and as approved by the County. Additional work may include removal of the grasses around each shrub and tree, installation of wood chips at each shrub and tree base, reseeding of the mitigation area, re-staking of existing trees, and erosion control protection, WETLAND & BUFFER MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN The enhanced buffer will be monitored once per year, over a three-year period. Monitoring will be conducted using the techniques and procedures described below to quantify the survival and the relative health and growth of plant material. A monitoring report submitted following each monitoring visit will describe and quantify the status of the mitigation at that time. Per King County Sensitive Areas Mitigation Guidelines, the monitoring report should be submitted to the County by October 31 of each monitoring year. The vegetation monitoring consists of inspection of the planted material to determine the health and vigor of the installation. All the planted material in the wetland and buffer will be inspected during each monitoring visit to determine the level of survival of the installation. Because only a very small area is being planted, coverage monitoring for the shrubs is not required. However, a visual estimate of herbaceous coverage within the buffers should be made each year. No more than 10% cover of non-native or other invasives, e.g, Scots broom, Himalayan blackberry, etc. is permissible in any monitoring year. The bond- holder is encouraged to maintain mitigation sites within these standards throughout out the monitoring period, to avoid corrective measures. Photo points should be identified on the site. During each monitoring visit, there should be photo documentation of the restoration project. Re: Wetland & Buffer Mitigation Plan Sandhu Property/No. L02CG408/ Job #A2-125 B-twelve Associates June 26, 2003 Page 3 of3 Visual observations of all wildlife species observed during the monitoring will be recorded. Standards of Success 1. Evaluation of the success of the mitigation project will be based upon a 90% survival rate for all planted vegetation at the end of year 3. 2. Evaluation of the success of the mitigation project will be based upon an 80% herbaceous cover within the seeded buffer areas at the end of Year 3. 3. No more than 10% cover of non-native or other invasives, e.g, Scots broom, Himalayan blackberry, etc. is permissible in any monitoring year. CONTINGENCY PLAN A contingency plan can be implemented if necessary. Contingency plans can include additional plant installation, erosion control, and plant substitutions including type, size, and location. File: dm/ A2125-Sandhu/ A2125-N ates.doc --., \''-. ---.-:_~:r:~ ·,-,,·;_,.,. King County , Department of Development and Envitoruncntal Services Land Use Services OM.don 900 Oake.,dale Annue S.lluthw .. t Renton, Wuhlnatoii" 98055-Ul9 DDES Activity No. l-o 2 C..G </ 0 €, During review of this development proposal, it was determined that this property contains one or more of the following sensitive areas and buffers, which are identified and protected by the Sensitive Area Code, KCC21A.24: Erosion Hazard Seismic Hazard ·· Landslide Hazard · Steep Slope Hazard Cqal Mine Hazard Class l Stream Class 2 Salmonid Stream Class 2 Perennial Stream Class 3 Stream Flood Hazard The Sensitive Areas Code requires a buffer of native vegetation around most of these sensitive areas. In order for a buffer to perform its functions, it must remain in an undisturbed condition as a ''setback are~" in which native plants are allowed to grow; no non-native species may be introduced into this area. However, certain agricultural uses and landscaping which existed in these areas_prior to 1990 are allowed to continue. In addition, a IS-foot building setback is required beyond the buffer boundary. This proposal appears to conform to the Sensitive Areas Code. The property owner is required by the Sensitive Areas Code to record a Notice 6n Title of the property before a permit may be issued. Please follow the instructions below to file a Notice on Title. A. Examine the enclosed site plan which shows our determination of the approximate boundaries of the sensitive areas, the buffer(s), and the building setback line(s) (BSBL) for your property. If you agree with the boundaries as __ ... drawn, then please follow the remaining instructions. If you do not agree with the boundaries as drawn, then please submit a revised site plan to the Site Development Services Section for review. Please wait for our approval of the new site plan prior to carrying out the instructions below. ·, B. Complete and notarize the attached Sensitive Area Notice and Legal Description forms. · C. Record the Notice, Legal Description, and site plan at the King County Office of Records·and Elections, located on the third floor of the King County Administration Building, 500 Fourth Avenue, Seattle. D. Be sure to get a copy of the recorded documents. E. Keep one copy and return two copies of the recorded documents to the Residential/Commercial permit counter at DOES before or when you pick up your building permit, or to the Site Development Services Section for plats, short plats, and clearing and grading permits. If you have any questions or concerns about this requirement, please contact. • --~----at 296-for geologic hazard areas ou]{iri Sloa,n __ at 296-7'5f) for stream, wetland, and wildlife sensitive areas or '.:;/ · · at 296-__ for flood hazard areas. F961SDSS1Not-bli,.ln111yl9, 19971mh . _, ,(,' .. ( .. Document Title(s) (or transactions contained herein):------------- Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: -~---------- Additional reference numbers on page ___ of document(s) Grantor(s) (last name, first name, initials):_-...-'--..:-,-------------- Additional names on page ___ of document(s) Grantee(s) (last name, first name, initials): _ \ Additional names on page __ of document(s): ------------- Legal description (abbreviated): Lot: __ _ Block: __ _ Plat/Section:. __ _ Township:. __ _ Range: __ Additional legal is on page ___ of document(s) Lot:. __ _ Block:. __ _ Plat/Section: __ _ Township: __ _ Range: __ ·_ Additional legal is on page ___ of document(s) Lot: __ _ Block: __ _ Plat/Section: __ _ Township:. __ _ Range: __ Additional legal is on page ___ of document(s) Lot: ·---!3lock .. · __ _ Plat/Section.: __ _ Township: __ _ Range:_ Additional legal is on page ___ of document(s) Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number(s): -------------- DO NOT WRITE IN MARGINS The Auditor/Reco.rder will rely on the information provided on this form. The staff will not read the attached document to verify the accuracy or completeness of the indexing information provided herein. F96/Lega1Cov,Sht 3/28/97-10:04 AM/dj ...... ® · King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 980.SS:\;!9 Sensitive Area . Notice· For.Permit Number: __ ?-_0_2....::(::...;t:,;;......c<f-_o...:e,::;...... ___________ _ For Parcel Number: __ &_· _/ _q_'t_&_o_o_Z-c.....;9:::.._1-_____ _ , more fully described as (st.reet address) This property contains sensitive areas and/or sensitive area buffers, as defined by the King County Sensitive Areas Ordinance, KCC 21A.24. The provisions of the Sensitive Areas Ordinance apply to this property. Limitation may exist on actions in or affecting the sensitive areas or their buffers present on this property. For further information regarding such limitation, please contact the Land Use Services Division of King County or its successor agency. This notice shall run with the land and shall not be removed except upon specific written authorization recorded herein by King County. I,(print) Ku Lw Arv:I s. S AN'.J>l:iU , hereby certify that I am the owner of the above-referenced property. ·~.r.~ (Owner's Signature)· SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this /7 r~y of Ju/lj , f9::._:200 3 notary seal Attachments ,· ® King Count)' Dept of Development and Emironmental Services Land Use Senices D1Yisl011 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renlon, Washin&U>n 980SH2i9 PARCEL A: • Lot 5, Block 2, Northwestern Garden Tracts, Division No. 6, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 46 of Plats, page(s) 100, records of King County, Washington; EXCEPT the West 300 feet thereof; AND That portion of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 33, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., lying between the Easterly and Westerly lines of the Bonneville Transmission Line right-of-way, as described in instrument recorded under Auditor's File No. 3178820, and lying between the North line of Lot 4 and the South line of Lot 7, in Block 2, Northwest Garden Tracts Division No. 6, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 46 of Plats, Page(s) 100, records of King County, Washington, extended Easterly. I, (print) //I! L W A • ,~, Sr "A A 1 !i)hereHb ll rti'fy th. t I th ___.Kc.= l_ ... ~i...;;;;:....:...:._'"l.!..:..1v::....!._....::._.:_...;<l!l-~ .,:::n, y ce a am e owner of the above-referenced property. ' .kJw-.,.,J r_ ~~~ (Owner's Signature) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this O day of F\w}Ll$~ • "'f Z~3 F96/SDSS/PeSCilpt.Lcg 07/29197/mh ~11u-~k NotaryPublici and for the State of Washington, residing at l&Lj~ /;k_~ ( owner's signature) \ ' ytVv ( f' 'f' • - l"IY f -- -... -.... I/' ii V /I' --~ ' I I I I ' ' I r ' r ~ ~ /..._,. s; It: w~ f-1,._,_,d.. ~ 'f f" V Iv I( ;/ J/' "' ' , , .. .. King County , Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Annue.~~uthwest Renton, Wasblnatoii" 98055-1219 DDES Activity No. lo?.-Utf05 · Date:;::0l'a I ( 2003 During review of this development· proposal, it was determined that this property contains one or more of the following sensitive areas and buffers, which are identified and protected by the Sensitive Area Code, KCC21A.24: Erosion Hazard Seismic Hazard ·· Landslide Hazard · Steep Slope Hazard Cqal Mine Hazard Class 1 Stream Class 2 Salmonid Stream Class 2 Perennial Stream Class3 Stream Flood.Hazard The Sensitive Areas Code requires a buffer of native vegetation around most of these sensitive areas. In order for a buffer to perform its functions, it must remain in an undisturbed condition as a "setback area" in which native plants are allowed to grow; no non-native species may be introduced into this area. However, certain agricultural uses and landscaping which existed in these areas .Prior to 1990 are allowed to continue. In addition, a 15-foot building setback is required beyond the buffer boundary. This proposal appears to conform to the Sensitive Areas Code. The property owner is required by the Sensitive Areas Code to record a Notice 6n Title of the property before a permit may be issued. Please follow the instructions below to file a Notice on Title. A. Examine the enclosed site plan which shows our determination of the approximate boundaries of the sensitive areas, the buffer(s), and the building setback line(s) (BSBL) for your property. If you agree with the boundaries as .. drawn, then please follow the remaining instructions. If you do not agree with the boundaries as drawn, then please submit a revised site plan to the Site Development Services Section for review. Please wait for our approval of the new site plan prior to. carrying out the instructions below. ·, B. Complete and notarize the attached Sensitive Area Notice and Legal Description forms. C. Record the Notice, Legal Description, and site plan at the King County Office of Records·and Elections, located on the third floor of the King County Administration Building, 500 Fourth Avenue, Seattle. D.. Be sure to get a copy of the recorded documents. E. Keep one copy and return two copies of the recorded documents to the Residential/Commercial permit counter at DDES before or when you pick up your building permit, or to the Site Development Services Section for plats, short plats, and clearing and grading permits. If you have any questions or concerns about this requirement, please contact. . -------at 296-for geologic hazard areas oi:lon S: lot::t.Vl _. at 296-.1!.zBJor stream, wetland, and wildlife sensitive areas or __ _;.:.,=. . ..,_·. ___ _ at 296-__ for flood hazard areas. ····i,.... ( Document Title(s) (or transactions contained herein):------------- Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released:------------ Additional reference numbers on page ___ of document(s) Grantor(s) (last name, first name, initials): _ ·-'-~'-------------- Additional names on page ___ of document(s) Grantee(s) (last name, first name, initials):_ \ Additional names on page __ of document(s): ------------- Legal description {abbreviated): Lot: __ _ Block; __ _ Plat/Section: __ _ Township: __ _ Range; __ Additional legal is on page ___ of document(s) . Lot: ---Block: __ _ Plat/Section: ---Township: __ _ Range: __ ._ Additional legal is on page ___ of document(s) Lot:-'---Block: __ Plat/Section: ---· Township: __ _ Range:_ Additional legal is on page ___ of document(s) Lot:. __ _ j3lock:. __ _ Plat/Section: __ _ Township:. __ _ Range:_ Additional legal is on page ___ of document(s) Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/ Account Number(s): -------------- DO NOT WRITE IN MARGINS The Audltor/Reco_rder will rely on the information provided on this form. The staff will not read the attached document to verify the accuracy or completeness of the indexing information provided herein. F96/LegalCov,Sht 3/28/97-10:04 AM/dj .. · .•. . . ---® ~· .. Sensitive Area Notice · King County ·~ Dept. or Development and Enviromnental Services Land Use ~ces Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 980,SS~!f.!9 For .Permit Number: --'l,'-o_?.__;;C...cG,'--'q-_o.,.~c.-------------- For Parcel Number: (p I 9 t (o()O 3ZO • more fully described as (street address) This property contains sensitive areas and/or sensitive area buffers, as defined by the King County Sensitive Areas Ordinance, KCC 21A.24. The provisions of the Sensitive Areas, Ordinance apply to this property. Limitation .may exist on actions in or affecting the sensitive areas or their buffers present on this property. For further information regarding such limitation, please contact the Land Use Services Division of King County or its successor agency. This notice shall run with the land and shall not be removed except upon specific written authorization recorded herein by King County. I, (print) f<u L WA 'v' 'T S -S i'\ "1 j) H lJ certify that I am the owner of the above-referenced property. , hereby '~ J'_~dL. (Owner's Signature)· SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this !J..:..l.ay of Ju/'-} , ~_zco_:-; F361Sena.Aru.no&/Jul)' 29, 1997/mh • • ® King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WashinJ!on 9B05H2i9 PARCEL B: Tract 7, Block 2, Northwestern Garden Tracts, Division No. 6, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 46 of Plats, page(s) 100, records of King County, Washington. Both Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. ST A TUTORY WARRANTY DEED -1 SANDKU\PA YMENT:STATWAR.R,01-01:-97:/.bn I, (print) l< (l L WP.NT -l~_ SA -N 'D H1.,1 hereby certify that I am the owner of the above-referenced property. ' 1-<~~ t ~~el~ (Owner'signature) · SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this D day of f\u.~ "'St , J/; 2<:f.:)3 Notary Public i State of Washington, residing at ' .. . _;~ ~CT~;,:, ·:_, ..... _ ,.~· (owner's signature) F96JSDSS/0<$oilpt.Leg 07/l9/971mh , .. t N 1'' ... 1oc,' 13.,~ I ~ s: 11'." lo.J<-Ti.#11> ) ' + N 1''=-100 1 ... .... --.,,,,. ~f-oul--lo <=-p~/t~f 1/1/01 ?Lo ' ----... ~ ' / f \ ~ 'r' f' y V ii ~ ,t' f .r ... -----,, / ' ' ' ' '-:: ~ , (' I v y I I r ,Y ,, ,, 'i' \ ,, " ' , / ,,. ,, ' / I / , ~ .... _.,, / ,,, I' f, . CJvon -S'vrv~«O(.) s~+ +,.~ °'pr1,·LC<..""-T 1/r/03 V5L,Q (I) King County Dept. of DevelopmeJU and Environmemal Servi<es Land Use Semus DMsllMl Prf!oc;,,n11truotton Conterenoe Ch•okUat 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 · Site· Dev•lopment.·S•ll"'Vlo•• s•oaon Project/File No. ______ Project Name. _____________ Date. ___ _ 1. Items Required At The Preconstruction Conference [ J Issued pemtit. [ ) Approved construction plans and drawings. ( J Copy of certification of liability insurance with additional insured clause naming King County and its employees. [ ) Bonds. [ ) Easement(s) for off-site work, if applicable. [ ) Temporary water quality modification pennit, HPA, Right-of-Way Use Pennit 2. Items Required At The Project Site During Construction [ J Copy of issued pennit and conditions. [ ) Set of approved plans. ( J Right-of-way use pennit, if required. [ ) Haul route agreements, if required. 3. Other Requirements ( J Call ONE-CALL (1-800-424-5555) and locate all existing utilities prior to starting any work [ ) Contact grading inspector one day prior to work start-up. [ ) If any suspension of work occurs exceeding 30 days, a renotify the inspector. ( J Working hours shall be from __ a.m. to ___p.m., Monday through Friday, and __ a.m. to ___p.m. on Saturday and Sunday unless other arrangements have been made with the grading supervisor prior to any change in the working hours. 4. Erosion And Sediment Control ( J Clearing limits shall be accurately flagged in the field as shown on the plans prior to commencement of construction. [ J Erosion/sediment control shall be installed as the first step of construction. [ J Field conditions may require that ESC measures indicated on the plans be modified or supplemented. [ J The pennittee is responsible for the adequacy of all ESC throughout the life of the project. [ ] Control mud onto existing streets. I) install approved construction entrances; 2) wash truck or truck tires if necessary; and 3) keep adjoining roads clean. Don't wash mud and silt into existing drainage systems. [ ) All denuded areas must be mulched and seeded or otherwise stabilized within the time period noted in the current King County Surface Water Design Manual. 5. Final Inspection Process [ J Final inspection shall be initiated upon project completion at the perrnittee's request for final inspection. [ ) Allow __ days to schedule inspection and an additional __ days to prepare final inspection punchlist. ( ) No bonds shall be released until final inspection has occurred and all required items have been addressed. 6. Special Conditions, Mitigations, Etc. l I 7. In Attendance: Company White: F'i le/Inspector Yellow: Permittee Pink: Contractor F!16/ SDSS/ Pr eCon-L. wrd 12-2B-95--07; 50am/ d j (•) Kina COUJlly Dept. of Development and Environmelllal Services Land Use Semas IJlvisi,m Pre9<>n•truotlon conferenoe ChfilQklllft 900 Oakoodale Avenue Southwest Renton, Wuhington 980SS-1219 e1te -Oeve1op1111ent·8•rv10••··Sacd,lon Project/File No .. ______ Project Name _____________ Date ___ _ 1. Item1 Required At Toe Preconstruction Conference I I Issued permit. [ J Approved construction plans and drawings. ( J Copy of certification of liability insurance with additional insured clause naming King County and its employees. I J Bonds. [ J Easement(s) for off-site work, if applicable. [ J Temporary water quality modification permit, HPA, Right-of-Way Use Permit 2. Item1 Required At The Project Site During Construction ( ) Copy of issued permit and conditions. I I Set of approved plans. [ J Right-of-way use permit, if required. [ J Haul route agreements, if required. 3. Other Requirements [ J Call ONE-CALL (1-800-424-5555) and locate all existing utilities prior to starting any work [ J Contact grading inspector one day prior to work start-up. [ J If any suspension of work occurs exceeding 30 days, a renotify the inspector. [ J Working hours shall be from __ a.m. to ___p.m., Monday through Friday, and __ a.m. to ___p.m. on Saturday and Sunday unless other arrangements have been made with the grading supervisor prior to any change in the working hours. 4. Erosion And Sediment Control ( J Clearing limits shall be accurately flagged in the field as shown on the plans prior to commencement of construction. [ J Erosion/sediment control shall be installed as the first step of construction. ( J Field conditions may require that ESC measures indicated on the plans be modified or supplemented. [ ] The permittee is responsible for the adequacy of all ESC throughout the life of the project. [ ] Control mud onto existing streets. I) install approved construction entrances; 2) wash truck or truck tires if necessary; and 3) keep adjoining roads clean. Don't wash mud and silt into existing drainage systems. [ J All denuded areas must be mulched and seeded or otherwise stabilized within the time period noted in the current King County Surface Water Design Manual. 5. Final Inspection Process [ J Final inspection shall be initiated upon project completion at the perrnittee's request for final inspection. [ ] Allow __ days to schedule inspection and an additional __ days to prepare final inspection punchlist. [ ] No bonds shall be released until final inspection has occurred and all required items have been addressed. 6. Special Conditions, Mitigations, Etc. 7. In Attendance: Company White: file/Inspector Yellow: Permittee Pink: Contractor F96/ SDSS/ Pi-econ-L. wrd 12-26-95--07: 50am/d) (•,) King County Dept. of Development aoo Environmclltal Services Land Use S.rvkti Di>islm Pr@0<»11•ruotlon co11tere11oe Cb....,kll•t· 900 Oakeadale Avenue Southwest Remon, Washington 98055-1219 ••• .O•v••~pment ••"•o••· eaot10111 Project/File No. ______ Project Name _____________ Date. ___ _ 1. Items Required At The Preconstruction Conference I I Issued permit. [ ] Approved construction plans and drawings. ( ] Copy of certification of liability insurance with additional insured clause naming King County and its employees. I J Bonds. [ ] Easement(s) for off-site work, if applicable. ( ] Temporary water quality modification permit, HPA, Right-of-Way Use Permit 2. Items Required At The Project Site During Construction [ J Copy of issued permit and conditions. [ ] Set of approved plans. [ ] Right-of-way use permit, if required. [ ] Haul route agreements, if required. 3. Other Requirement• ( ] Call ONE-CALL (1-800-424-5555) and locate all existing utilities prior to starting any work ( ] Contact grading inspector one day prior to work start-up. [ ] If any suspension of work occurs exceeding 30 days, a renotify the inspector. ( ] Working hours shall be from __ a.m. lo ____p.m., Monday through Friday, and __ a.m. to ____p.m. on Saturday and Sunday unless other arrangements have been made with the grading supervisor prior to any change in the working hours. 4. Erosion And Sediment Control ( ] Clearing limits shall be accurately flagged in the field as shown on the plans prior to commencement of construction. ( ] Erosion/sediment control shall be installed as the first step of construction. ( ] Field conditions may require that ESC measures indicated on the plans be modified or supplemented. ( J The permittee is responsible for the adequacy of all ESC throughout the life of the project. [ ] Control mud onto existing streets. l) install approved construction entrances; 2) wash truck or truck tires if necessary; and 3) keep adjoining roads clean. Don1 wash mud and silt into existing drainage systems. ( ] All denuded areas must be mulched and seeded or otherwise stabilized within the time period noted in the current King County Surface Water Design Manual. 5. Final Inspection Process [ ] Final inspection shall be initiated upon project completion at the permittee's request for final inspection. [ ] Allow __ days to schedule inspection and an additional __ days to prepare final inspection punchlist. [ ] No bonds shall be released until final inspection has occurred and all required items have been addressed. 6. Special Conditions, Mitigations, Etc. 7. In Attendance: Company White: File/Inspector Yellow: Permittee Pink; Contractor F96/ SDSS/ PraCon-L. wrd 12-28-95--07: SOarn/d j King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW, Renton, WA 98055-1219 Date:_6/26/03. _____ _ Bond Quantity Worksheet for Sensitive Area Mitigations Project Name:_Sandhu _______________________ _ Project Number:_K.C. No. L02CG408 B-twelve #A2-125. _______________________ _ Location:_12044 SE 184th St, Parcel #6199600320 _________________________ _ Contact Name: _B-twelve Associates, Darcey Miller _________________________ _ Address:_ 1103 West Meeker Street, Kent, WA. ___________________________ _ TREES (INCLUDES DELIVERY, INSTALLATION, & MATERIALS Scientific Name Common Name Qty Unit Price 1 gallon = Abies f!!andis .. 2rand fir --Acer macrophy//um big leaf m8:e_le $13.54 A/nus rubra red alder $13.22 Arbutus menziesii Pacific madrone $14.50 Betula papyritera paper birch $13.22 Fraxinus Jatifolia Orej!on ash $13.22 Picea sitchensis .. Sitka s_eruce $13.54 Pi nus contorta • Shore _eine $13.54 Pin us monticola .. Western white _eine $13.54 Populus tremuloides quaking a~i:ien -Populus !richocarpa black cottonwood $13.54 Prunus emarJl!nata bitter cher_!Y $13.54 Psuedotsuga menziesii* DouRlas fir $13.54 Taxus brevifolia" Pacific yew Thuja plicata" western red cedar $13.54 Tsuga heterophlla* western hemlock $13.54 Total 1 gal Qty I Unit Price 2jl_al Qty I Unit Price 5 _!l_•I Total 2 Jlallon Total 5 .9.allon Total >''''!,wool I I •$0 oo . ::~'.oo I I I $0;00 · •• . -::so.oo I I rs:d)/tso.oo ~ I I $0~1 I I ,,so,~ y~:7 s23.51uii:i · :m!!O~ . . $0.00 •• •• $24.15 t:!' $0.00 :J;.)1$0.QO /:'.::Jl;!$Q;Oo' '$0:QO $23.51 ,:$0.0Q. · • ii11!i:<io: $23.51 I< :':>i$0:QO $23.82 Total Total: .::./:f&oo r,w,Q(r $();00 $Q,4;)'Q •:$0.00 $44.74 I $0,oo $0,00 $44.74 L:: ·~g.go .. $44.74 1:,,,1f$0:oa All plant prices are from Fourth Comer Nurseries, Sound Native Plants, Storm Lake Growers, and Wabash Natives (containers); and Abundant Life and Frosty Hollow (seeds). at~ !Total Cost Contact: B-twelve Associates, 1103 W Meeker St., Kent, WA 98032 (253) 859-0515 Document revised Aug. 8, 1998 DATE Page 1 of 4 VED 1, 2-003 SHRUBS (INCLUDES DELIVERY, INSTALLATION, & MATERIALS) !Scientific Name I Common Name JQty Unit Price 1 gallon Qty Unit Price 2 gallon Qty Unit Price Is gallon jQ1y 1 gallon Total 2 gallon Total 5 gallon jTotal • Acer Circinatum vine maple $13.54 $0.00 $23.51 $0.00 $0.00 Amelanchier alnifolia serviceberry $13.54 .$0.00 $23.82 $0.00 $0.00 Berberis aquifolium tall Oregon grape $0.00 $24.15 $0.00 $0.00 Berberis netvosa short Oregon grape $13.86 $Q.OO $0.00 $0.00 Camus stolonifera red-osier dogwood $13.22 $0.00 $23.51 $0.00 $0.00 Cory/us comuta hazelnut $13.54 •• $0.00 $23.51 $0.00 $0.00 Crataegus douglasii black hawthorn $13.22 $0.00 $23.51 so:oo $0.00 Gaultheria shallon salal $13.86 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Holodiscus discolor ocean spray 19 $13.54 $257,26 $23.51 $0.00 $0.00 Lonicera involucrata black twinberry $13.54 .·.·· $0.00 $22.87 $0.00 $0.00 Myricagale sweetgale $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Oplopanax horridus Devil's club $13.86 $0.00 $24.15 . .$0.00 $0.00 Philadephus lewisii mock orange $13.54 .·· $0.00 $22.87 $0.0Q $0.00 Physocarpus capitatus Pacific ninebark 18 $13.22 $237.9$ $23.51 · ..... $0.00 $0:00 Prunus virginiana choke cherry $0.00 .. $0.00 $0.00 Pyrus fusca western crabapple $13.22 .·.·· $0.00 $23.51 $0.00 $0.00 Rhamnus purshiana cascara $13.22 , $0.00 $23.51 . $():00' $0.00 Rhododendron macrophullum Pacific rhododendron $14.19 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Ribes bracteosum stink currant $13.22 $0.00 $0.00 $0.QO Ribes lacustre prickly currant $13.86 $0.00 ... ,, $0.00 $0.00 Ribes sanguineum red.flowering currant $13.86 $0.00 . $0.00 $0.00 Rosa nulkana Nootka rose 12 $13.54 $162.48 $23.51 .... $0.00 $0.00 Rosa pisocarpa clustered rose $13.54 . $().00 $22.87 $0.00 $0.00 Rubus leucodermis black raspberry . .$0.00 .,. $0.00 $0.0Q Rubus pa,viflorus thimbleberry 18 $13.54 $243.72 . so:oo $0.00 Rubus spectabiJ;s salmonberry $13.22 .. $0.00 $23.51 $0.00 $0.00 Salix geyeriana Geyer willow $13.22 $0.00 $22.87 $0.00 $0.00 Salix hookeriana Hooker's willow $12.91 . $0.00 $22.87 . .. $0.00 SaHx Jasiandra Pacific willow $13.22 $0.00 $22.87 $0.00 Salix scouleriana Scouler willow $22.87 .. $0.00 Salix sitchensis Sitka willow $13.22 $0.00 $22.87 $0.00 I T I $0.00 Sambucus racemosa red elderberry $13.54 $0.00 $23.51 $0.00 $0.00 Sorbus sitchensis Cascade mountain ash Symphoricarpos a/bus snowberry $13.22 $0.00 $23.51 $0.00 $0.00 Vaccinium ovatum evergreen huckleberry $13.86 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Vaccinium parvifolium red huckleberry $15.47 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total: •1}fw1:i2 Tota!: >. Total: · t'$o.ool sU6t'Ot~ti:'I Contact: 8-twefve Associates, 1103 W. Meeker St., Kent, WA 98032 {253) 859-0515 Page 2 of 4 INSTALLATION COSTS (LABOR, EQUIPMENT, OVERHEAD & PROFln Scientific Name Unit Price Unit Amount Total Cost Compost, vegetable, delivered and spread $37.88 CY Jjfi$Q~ffl);j Decompacting till/hardpan, medium, to 6" depth $1.57 CY , ...• ®. ~;_\,,ii Decompacting ti!Vhardpan, medium, to 12" depth . $1.57 CY lll;Mt Fertilize, slow release tablets, 30gm/tree . $3.21 Each jt~QO~ Hydroseeding $0.51 SY i< ·.'!l!i~m PLANTS: Slips (willow, red-osier) $1.32 Each . , PLANTS: Stakes (willow) $0.96 Each· t®ii Tops oil -delivered & Spread $35.73 ex .' · .. •1·:,r."c"-0\ OL µ Subtotal $0.00 GRASSES/EMERGENTS INCLUDES DELIVERY, INSTALLATION, & MATERIALS) Sq.ft. Pounds --$75;95 lb. -~ ~-Wetland Seed Mix 31b/1000 sq.ft. 0 .. 1000 . f._,.,,i Buffer Seed Mix 31b/1000 sq.ft. 0 $50.68 lb. . 1000 . . .. Ontv Unit Price I Unit , Emergent Sedge, rush & grass $1.32 4• pot I .. ·",; •• ,,_ l Subtotal $0.00 HABITAT STRUCTURES (INCLUDES DELIVERY, INSTALLATION, & MATERIALS) Specific Name Unit Cost Unit !Total Cost Fascines (willow) . . Each· . "'· ~-~-'J Woody debris, large $163.00 Each . ' '" Snags $400.00 Each . . l!lll, . I Subtotal I $0.00 Contact: B·twefve Associates, 1103 W. Meeker St., Kent, WA 98032 (253) 859·0515 Page 3 of 4 GENERAL ITEMS (INCLUDES DELIVERY, INSTALLATION, & MATERIALS) Specific Name Unit Cost Units • Fencing, chain link, 6' high $18.89 LF . *Fencing, split rail, 3' high (2-rail) $10.54 LF Fencing, Temporary (NGPE) $1.20 LF . Signs, Sensitive Area Boundary 8 $8.00 Each . . Fish Stream Sign Irrigation, Temporary $ 2,000.00 Acre Subtotal $64.00 OTHER COSTS-THROUGHOUT MONITORING PERIOD Item Unltl Cost Unit Total Cost Inspection, annual 2 $460.00. Each Inspection, final 1 $575.00 EaCh I'% Maintenance, semi-annual $Cl.CO Eiicfi Maintenance, annual $0;00 E8ch ::~; rvlonitoring annual 3 $1,000.00 Each·· 1m1w111Jl!l ,_ ...... """ Subtotal S4 495.00 Total Construction Amount $11,822.26 Total Bond Amount Agency Multiplier $14,n7.83 Aaencv Note: All Grading expenses and fencing (permanent and erosion) are included in the grading bond for the entire project site. I I I Contact: B-twelve Associates, 1103 W. Meeker St., Kent, WA 98032 (253) 859-0515 Page 4 of 4 ' King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW, Renton, WA 98055-1219 Date:_6/26/03 _____ _ Bond Quantity Worksheet for Sensitive Area Mitigations Project Name:_Sandhu. _______________________ _ Project Number:_K.C. No. L02CG408 B-twelve #A2-125 _______________________ _ Location:_ 12044 SE 184th St, Parcel #6199600320. _________________________ _ Contact Name: _B-twelve Associates, Darcey Miller _________________________ _ Address: _1103 West Meeker Street, Kent, WA, ___________________________ _ TREES (INCLUDES DELIVERY, INS_TALLATION, & MATERIALS Scientific Name !Common Name I Qty Unit Price 1 gal 1 gallon Total Abies grandis .. grand fir Acer macrophyllum big leaf maple $13.54 I, . ';,$QJ)O' A/nus rubra red alder $13.22, .·• '· $411;@ Arbutus menzies;; Pacific madrone $14.50 Betula papyrifera paper birch $13.22 IL Fraxinus latifolia Oregon ash $13.22 Picea sitchensis .. Sitka spruce $13.54 Pi nus contorta • Shore pine $13.54 Pinus monticola • Western white pine $13.54 Populus tremuloides quaking aspen Populus trichocarpa black cottonwood $13.54 Prunus emarginata bitter cherry $13.54 Psuedotsuga menziesii* Douglas fir $13.54 T axus bre vifolia .. Pacific yew Thuja plicata • western red cedar $13.54 Tsuga heterophlla* western hemlock $13.54 Total Qty I Unit Price 2_g_allon $23.51 $24.15 $24.15 $24.15 $24.15 $23.51 $23.51 $23.51 $23.82 Total 2.11_al Total ''i:1:i::-$0.00 ,, All plant prices are from Fourth Corner Nurseries, Sound Native Plants, Storm Lake Growers, and Wabash Natives (containers); and Abundant Life and Frosty Hollow (seeds). OttlUnit Price 5.l!_al S_g_allon Total Total: ---$0~QQ;{'1 $0:QO", '"'F$0.oo: ;;::::;;;'$0~_00" :;;::;!!?$0.00' 'h'i',,;$0.00 :::k,i~,Q(i i'$1/.\io' ~qgl .,:l!(),-00, :40:00 $44.74 , . $411,-0() ' ::jo.c>o $44.74 " $0:00 $44.74 ,•:$0:oo Qty !Total Cost Contact: 8-twelve Associates, 1103 W. Meeker St., Kent, WA 98032 (253) 859-0515 Document revised Aug. 8, 1998 Page 1 of 4 SHRUBS (INCLUDES DELIVERY, INSTALLATION, & MATERIALS) Scientific Name !Common Name IQty Unit Price 1 gallon Qty Unit Price 2 gallon Qty Unit Price IS gallon !Qty !Total Cost 1 gallon Total 2 gallon Total 5 gallon lTotal .. Acer Circinatum vine maple $13.54 $0.00 $23.51 $0.00 $0.00 Amelanchier a/nifolia serviceberry $13.54 .· $0.00 $23.82 $0.00 $0.00 Barberis aquifo/ium tall Oregon grape $0.00 $24.15 ,$0.00 $0.00 Berberis nervosa short Oregon grape $13.86 > $0.00 • $0'00 $0:0Q Comus stolonifera red-osier dogwood $13.22 •, . $0.00 $23.51 $0.QO ... $0.-00. Cory/us comuta hazelnut $13.54 $0.00 $23.51 .. $0.00 $0.00 Crataegus douglasii black hawthorn $13.22 $0.00 $23.51 ·. $0.00 $0.00 Gaultheria shallon salal $13.86 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Holodiscus discolor ocean spray 19 $13.54 $257.26 $23.51 ·• $0.QO $0.00 Lonicera involucrata black twinberry $13.54 ... c$Q.OO $22.87 $0.00 $0.00 Myrica gale sweet gale . $0.00 $0.00 .,,·,. $0.001 Oplopanax horridus Devil's club $13.86 $0.00 $24.15 ;•.$0.00 $0.00 Philadephus /ewisU mock orange $13.54 $0.00 $22.87 $0.00 $0.00 Physocarpus capitatus Pacific ninebark 18 $13.22 $237'.96 $23.51 $0.00 ;• $0.00 Prunus virginiana choke cherry $0.00 ;_$0.00 $0.00 Pyrus fusca western crabapple $13.22 ,, $0.0Q $23.51 $0.00 . ,,-$0.00 Rhamnus purshiana cascara $13.22 . $0.00 $23.51 $0.00 ,' >$0.00 Rhododendron macrophul/um Pacific rhododendron $14.19 . $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Ribes bracteosum stink currant $13.22 . ... $0.00 ' $0.00 .• $0.00 Ribes lacustre prickly currant $13.86 ' $0.00 $0.00 ·$0.00 Ribes sanguineum red.flowering currant $13.86 $0.00 . • ';$0.00 $0.00 Rosa nutkana Nootka rose 12 $13.54 . $162.48 $23.51 $0.00 :-,:$'6~00, Rosa pisocarpa clustered rose $13.54 $0.00 $22.87 I•. $0:oo. $0.00 Rubus leucodermis black raspberry $0.00 1•;0 $0:00 $0.00 Rubus parviflorus thimbleberry 18 $13.54 0$243.72 • $0.00 $0.00 Rubus spectabilis salmonberry $13.22 $0.00 $23.51 .· ;$0.QO $0.00 Salix geyeriana Geyer willow $13.22 ,$0.00 $22.87 .· $0.00 $0.00 Salix hookeriana Hooker's willow $12.91 $0.00 $22.87 .. $0.00 Salix lasiandra Pacific willow $13.22 $0.00 $22.87 . $0.00 .... ·. Salix scouleriana Scouler willow $22.87 ,,-:, c'.: $0.'0Q' Salix sitchensis Sitka willow $13.22 '$0.bo $22.87 .. $0.00 I I ,. $0.00 Sambucus racemosa red elderberry $13.54 $0.00 $23.51 $0.00 , $0.00 Sorbus sitchensis Cascade mountain ash .. Symphoricarpos a/bus snowberry $13.22 . $0.00 $23.51 $0.00 $0.00 Vaccinium ovatum evergreen huckleberry $13.86 $0.00 .. $0.00 $0.00 Vaccinium parvifolium red huckleberry $15.47 $0.QO . $0.00 · $0.00 Total: 1';•c,,,;i;r sUbtOia1-/ Contact: 8-twelve Associates, 1103 W. Meeker St., Kent, WA 98032 (253) 859-0515 Page 2 of 4 INSTALLATION COSTS (LABOR, EQUIPMENT, OVERHEAD & PROFIT) Scientific Name I Unit Price Unit I !Amount Compost, vegetable, delivered and spread $37.88 CY Decompacting till/hardpan, medium, to 6" depth $1.57 CY Decompacting till/hardpan, medium, to 12" depth $1.57 CY Fertilize, slow release tablets, 30gm/1ree $3.21 Each Hydroseeding $0.51 SY PLANTS: Slips (willow, red-osier) $1.32 Each PLANTS: Stakes (willow) $0.96 Each Topsoil -delivered & Spread $35.73 ex Subtotal GRASSES/EMERGENTS(INCLUDES DELIVERY, INSTALLATION, & MATERIALS2 Sq.ft. Wetland Seed Mix 31b/1000 sq.ft. 0 $75.95 lb. 1000 Buffer Seed Mix 31b/1000 sq.ft. 0 $50.68 lb. 1000 Qnty !Unit Price !Unit Emergent Sedge, rush & grass $1.32 4" pot Subtotal HABITAT STRUCTURES (INCLUDES DELIVERY, INSTALLATION, & MATERIALS} Specific Name Unit Cost Unit Fascines (willow) . Eacll Woody debris, large · · $163.00 Each Snags $400.00 Each Subtotal Contact: B-twelve Associates, 1103 W. Meeker St., Kent!_ ~A 98032 (253) 859-0515 Page 3 of 4 GENERAL ITEMS (INCLUDES DELIVERY, INSTALLATION, & MATERIALS) Specific Name Unit Cost Units Total Cost Fencing, chain link, 6' high $18,89 LF . ·····~~~ *Fencing, split rail, 3' high (2-rail) $10.54 LF ,-,,~ '1""1 . Fencing, Temporary (NGPE) $1.20 LF ' ' :, Signs, Sensitive Area Boundary 8 $8.00 Each '"' Fish Stream Sign Irrigation, Temporary $ 2,000.00 Acre Subtotal $64.00 OTHER COSTS-THROUGHOUT MONITORING PERIOD Item I Unltl Cost Unit Total Cost . Inspection, annual 2 $460.00 Each .. Inspection, final 1 $575.00 Each ·., ,, ___ , Maintenance, semi-annual $0.QO Each "_t, Maintenance, annual · $0.00 Each . Monitoring annual 3 $1,000.00 Each .. . Subtotal 4 495.00 I Total Construction Amount $11,822.26 Total Bond Amount Agency Multiplier $14,777.83 Aaencv Note: All Grading expenses and fencing (permanent and erosion) are included in the grading bond for the entire project site. I I I Contact: B-twelve Associates, 1103 W. Meeker St., Kent, WA 98032 (253) 859-0515 Page 4 of 4 King County Department of Development _Enviormantal Services Detailed Time Report L02CG408 GRADE Date Employee type fn task hours note 12/02/2002 PINTLWAL RH cs 300 Permit Processing 0.5 12/05/2002 LSDSJSLO RH SA 100 Case/Plan Review 0.25 Mtg w/ RLOC, KNEW 12/05/2002 Leeson, Ramon RH GA 661 0.5 review file with kfli & jslo 12/13/2002 Leeson, Ramon RH GA 515 Field Check 2 12/13/2002 LSDSJSLO RH SA 515 Field Check 1. 75 Site visit 12/17/2002 LSDSJSLO RH SA 100 Case/Plan Review 0.25 review 01/08/2003 LSDSJSLO RH WL 100 Case/Plan Review 2.75 review, pull aerials, 2nd look at GIS, mtg w/ RLOC, pull enfor photos, strt comm 01/08/2003 Leeson. Ramon RH GA 661 1 discuss plan w/ jslo 01/09/2003 LSDSJSLO RH WL 100 Case/Plan Review 0.25 continued review 01/10/2003 LSDSJSLO RH WL 100 Case/Plan Review 1 comments to RLOC, mtg w/ RLOC 01/10/2003 Lacson, Ramon RH GA 661 1.5 talk w/ jslo re: project 01/13/2003 Lacson, Ramon RH GA 161 3 review plans and start wci letter 01/13/2003 LSDSJSLO RH WL 100 Case/Plan Review 0.25 mtg w/ RLOC 01/14/2003 Lacson, Ramon RH GA 161 2 plan review and finish wci letter 01/31/2003 Lacson, Ramon RH GA 661 0.5 03/05/2003 Leeson, Ramon RH GA 920 Correspondence 1 review file and write extension letter 03/12/2003 LUCAJSLO RH WL 100 Case/Plan Review 0.25 mtg w/ RLOC, review letter sent by RLOC 03/12/2003 Lacson, Ramon RH GA 920 Correspondence 1 set up mtg per req. & review file 03/12/2003 LUCAJSLO RH WL 100 Case/Plan Review 0.25 sched meeting w/ B-12, engr, mtg w/. RLOC 03/18/2003 LUCAJSLO RH WL 515 Field Check 1.75 Mtg on site w/ engr, biologist, and Mr. Sandhu, RLOC 03/18/2003 Lacson, Ramon RH GA 515 Field Check 1.25 site mtg w/ jslo to meet applicants per their request 03/18/2003 Lacson, Ramon RH GA 920 Correspondence 0.75 made copies of pictures and mailed out per appl request 03/19/2003 LUCAJSLO RH WL 100 Case/Plan Review 0.25 respond w/ comments to Mark Stieffel meeting notes 03/20/2003 LUCAJSLO RH WL 100 Case/Plan Review 0.25 spoke w/ RLOC, reviewed Mark Stieffel revised meeting notes 06/19/2003 Lacson, Ramon RH GA 920 Correspondence 0.5 e-mail response for additional time to submit info 06/30/2003 Lacson, Ramon RH GA 661 1 review received revisions 07/01/2003 LUCAJSLO RH WL 100 Case/Plan Review 3.25 Rvw plan;mtgw/RLOC;app stmp;fgmu;bnd file;perm+; rtng; SANT;conditions 07/01/2003 Lacson, Ramon RH GA 135 2 route plan to wetland rev. and review plans, redline 07/02/2003 Lacson, Ramon RH GA 135 1.5 plan review 07/03/2003 Lacson, Ramon RH GA 161 0.75 review revised plans 07/08/2003 Lacson, Ramon RH GA 161 0.5 07/09/2003 ADMISGRA RH FG 355 0.75 create acts, form prep and lttr for issuance 07/14/2003 ADMISGRA RH FG 355 0.75 create wetl act, formprep, phone sandhu and mail Summary For L02CG408 35.25 Hours Total Average Hours 1.07 Wednesday, July 16, 1003 Page I of/ Page 1 of2 Locsin, Ramon From: MARK W STIEFEL Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1: 17 PM To: darcey@o12assoc.com Cc: 'Kulwant Sandhu'; 'Locsin, Ramon' Subject: Re: Sandhu #L02CG408 Darcey, Thanks for the follow through. I appear to have solved the computer software glitch in AutoCAD 2000. I am still having problems saving the file in R-14 format to forward to you. In the interest of time I am trying to complete the grading plan today and have a submittal package ready by Monday morning. If my work is ready, I would like to submit directly to DDES Ramon to let them start the review process, with the understanding that you would submit the mitigation planting plan the following week. However, if Ramon prefers to receive the total submittal package at the same time, then I would deliver my plans to your office. So could then submit the package to Ramon when you plans are complete. Mark W. Stiefel, P. E. -----Original Message ----- From: Darcey Miller To: 'Locsin, Ramon' Cc: 'MARK W STIEFEL' Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 10:51 AM Subject: RE: Sandhu #L02CG408 Ramon, I'm writing to ask you for an extension of 2 weeks on the submittal of additional information for the Sandhu project. It was due on June 15, 2003. Mark Stiefel has oeen diligently working on the grading p1an, but has run into computer/CAD proolems, causing an unintentional delay. We need his work oefore we can continue with ours. We oelieve that this extension will still allow the planting and seeding to occur this Fall. I spoke with Jon Sloan yesterday aoout the extension, so he has oeen notified of our delay. Please feel free to call my cell phone to discuss the extension, as I am leaving for the field at this lime. 206-510-4732. Thank you very much. Darcey B .. Miller Wetlands Ecologist B-twelve Associates 1103 W. Meeker St. Kent, WA 98032 (253) 859-0515 (253) 852-4732 Fax da_rcey@o12assoc.com -----Original Message----- From: Locsin, Ramon [mailto:Ramon.Locsin@METROKC.GOV] 08/13/2003 Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:33 PM To: 'darcey@b12assoc.com' Subject: RE: Sandhu #L02CG408 Darcy, That is correct. The submittal should be directed to my attention. Ramon C. Locsin Site Development Specialist Site Development Services Section i,and Use Servi.ces Division King County DDES ph: (206) 296-7151 fx: (206! 296···7055 -----Original Message----- From: Darcey Miller [mailto:darcey@bl2assoc.com] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:53 AM To: Ramon.Locsin@METROKC.GOV Subject: Sandhu #L02CG408 Ramon, Page 2 of2 We will be submitting the Sandhu restoration plan at the end of this week. I wanted to verify that there are no fees required to be paid at this point, as this is just submittal of additional information. Also, should we direct the package to you, Jon Sloan, or someone else? Thank you. Darcey B. Miller Wetlands Ecologist B-twelve Associates 1103 W. Meeker St. Kent, WA 98032 (253) 859-0515 (253) 852-4732 Fax darcey@b 12aSSOC0 CO_m 08/13/2003 ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue S.W. Renton, Washington 9805Sp1219 • .. P~·r·rTl•·it······· ~P·P.1 .. J. 2 a tjo n .. ·.· wol:Rsheet· General Instructions Part l of this form must be completed prior to scheduling a preapplication meeting with Land Use Services Division (LUSD). Call LUSD Sile Development Services Section at (206) 296-6640 or complete and return the attached meeting request form to arrange your preapplication meeting. Part II of this form must be completed by DDES staff prior to application. Part III of this form will be completed by DDES staff prior to application. PART I: Project Name: 'SvtVld k Lot: Block: Tract:. __ _ Location: \ 2.,. o}l4 S §'. I 8:::'{ ,S-f- Street Address: Re;;:. n±9 Y\ ' Description of Project: Parcel#: (,,Jj'}(poo3;;,.o. t, I '/'.'ft,06Z$2- ' Zoning:_..r,.,:-~_-_,S::c.o::.-_______ _ (if multiple parcels, attach &eparale page) Applicant: k;;qwflrJ1 S'. SANDHU Address: I __ /? 9 S'£ / S '7 f L Owner: ___ --=~'-'-'-'-,,-f=.. _____ _ Address: ____ ...,/,c_ ______ _ ~~n ~ j'B'"Oo.t Phone No.: = ~ ,j_ & -8-o :z.,lf 7 Phone No.: _ __./'----------- Note: If the applicant is other than the owner, a/Jlhorization from the legal owner must be provided. "'"' f)-~ /Asoc ~~:~:~!1SS$1¥#r; ii tr t !vA 9F:C >? . Proposed Scope of Work: Total quantity of excavation: Total quantity of fill: To'tal quantity of imported fill: cubic yards -----cubic yards -----cubic yards J .l\11 h II av,J; It Ii., V '1 cf..,,.- Total quantity of exported excavation: --,----cubic yards Total size of site; (.v,3 acres Total area~ cleared or graded: /. 3f acres Jerne Hqn,dtn3 Percentage of worx lo be completed during the first year: _ _,_/_6_o __ % ,,.,;/( O( C <.vJ I CM., pev0 c.: p; I u c,e PART II: This portion of the worxsheet will be completed by the Grading Unit at the time of the preapplication meeting. Permit Type.:_--------------Inspection Area:. _________ _ Related Proj. No./Name:. _________________________ _ FEES: Plan Review Fees: Total Volume: c.y. Cleared or Graded Area, ______ acres Operating Fees: Volume: Unreclaimed Area: Other {list) S EPA: Drainage: Sens Area: -----~ c.y. ------acres Yes: __ Yes: __ Yes: __ No:_ No: __ No: __ Credits (list): Penalties (list) $. ____ _ Charge Penalties to .:_ ----- (SIERRA ACTIVITY#) Cap$. ____ _ other: _____________________________ _ n,/P.IIW-SOSS.Wrd Ot/J0/'6 11:2'7 AH/di Page l I Part Ill • Additional lnfonnation: <: List any pending or issued pennits or approvals that may affect processing of this application. £o2--&=0D16 List g lmown ·or suspected sensitive areas identified on or adjacent to this property. Has a previous environmental detennlnation been completed for this proposal? Yes_ No_ ls a stonn drainage plan being submitted with this proposal? Yes_ No_ Submittal Requirements: Quantity i /5 15 ,3 Description ' Application Worksheet * Grading Plan · Environmental Checklist Environmental Detennination Quantity Calculations Drainage Plan/Cales Sol_ls/Geotech Report Wetlands/Stream Report Certification of Sensitive Areas Compliance Certification of Applicant Status and/or Transfer of Applicant Status Current Assessor's Maps & List of tax parcels for public notice when required Legal Description (may be included on site plan) Variance/Reasonable Use Exception • . Estimated Application Fees ~ o.:r o...ppl I c~, OY"\ Payment Schedule · · Other. (L.5-toYcJ=' I DY. 0 / 0:() I • Grading plan shall Include at a minimum the following Information unless specifically waived: vicinity. topography, dimensions. clearing limits, open spacet NGPE's, conservation easements, dralnzige systems, buildings, structures, landscape: and restoration plans, sensitive areas and associated buffers and other Information as may be required by the director. For purposes of this application, the following items are considered waived unless specifically requested above: Fire District receipt, current Certificate of Water Availability, proof that the lot(s) are recognized as separate lots, Certificate of Sewer Availability or site percolation date with preliminary Seattle King County Health Department Approval, Certificate of Future Connection for Sewer or Water if in Urban growth area, and Certificate of Transportation Concurrency. This completed form must be signed by a representative of the Grading Unit and must accompany the completed permit application or the application will not be accepted. This approval includes a waiver for purposes of application, those items more specifically noted above. Approved by: tJ{u ' b /.. J'\h/~ Date: 2. / 2 71 O 2._ Application Accepted By: _____________ _ Date_/_/_ The applicant understands that signing and submitting this application authorizes ODES staff to inspect the site at any reasonable time for the purpose of permit review. Signed:._~ __ . _ ___:---=~=..:-=~---------Date: 7-3D·-02- F9'/f',1J,1-S0SS.Wt"d _Ot/30/9' 11:2? ,IX/dj f'ilge 2 ------ all plantings done. Invasive weeds creeping up in mitigation area. Not all plants in. Will talk with applicant. Left message to call me back. LOCSINR 07/14/2004 Site meeting today with Mr. Sandhu. Additional plantings were planted outside of the approved location. He will move them into location and remove the invasive weeds. He will let me know when he is done. LOCSINR 10/15/2004 Planting inspection on 10/12/04. Plants installed properly per > plan. Changing status to monitor. Still need fencing to be done per approved plan. lu_comm 5/16/05 (® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Applicant SANDHU, KULWANT Location: 12044 SE 184TH ST Site Address: Permit Type: GRADE , Sub-Type: GRADING Title: SANDHU GRADING RESTORATION Permit Number: L02CG408 Date Printed: 07-07-2006 Status: MONITOR Applied: 12/02/2002 Decision: 07/15/2003 Description: REMOVAL OF FILL & RESTORATION OF WETLAND The following holds, notices, and comments have been entered. WALKERLI 12/02/2002 SET UP FILE AND ROUTE TO KNEW THIS DAY LSDSKNEW 12/04/2002 Permit application came in on 11/20/02, and it was not received in the grading section until 12/3102. LSDSKNEW 1210412002 ***CONTACT KNEW PRIOR TO SITE VISIT!!*** LOCSINR 1211712002 Documents routed to Jon Sloan for wetland review today. LSDSTHIN 12/19/2002 Routed to JSLO LSDSJSLO 01/1012003 WETL-completed prelim review, requirements emailed to RLOC 1110103, as follows: DATE: January 9, 2003 TO: Ramon Locsin, Site Development Specialist FM: Jon Sloan, Env. Scientist RE: L02CG408, Sandhu I have completed a site visit and reviewed the following information for the referenced proposal: -Wetland Analysis Report, 8-12 Associates, August 5, 2002 -Earthwork Estimate Opinion, Mark Stiefel, P.E., November 5, 2002 -Site Plan, 8-12 Associates, August 2002 -Letter of Darcey Miller (8-12 Associates) to Kathy Newborn (ODES), November 19, 2002 At this time I will require the following items to be addressed prior to completing sensitive areas review: 1. Photographs taken immediately following the unauthorized clearing and grading indicate that fill material was placed within the wetland (see Photo #1 ). The wetland report indicates that "it appears that the clearing I grading occurred within the wetland buffer only, and not in wetlands." My site visit confirms that fill material has been placed within wetlands, though it is difficult to determine the extent without examining soil borings. As such, please request that the applicant provide a supplemental wetland analysis that includes a thorough examination of manually installed soil pits throughout the area adjacent the channelized portion of Wetland A/8/C. The supplemental analysis shall be required prior to acceptance of delineated wetland boundaries. 2. To restore the wetland buffer to preexisting conditions, the applicant has proposed to restore the original grade and reseed with native grass seed mix. This strategy does not compensate for termporal loss of wetland functions and construction impacts. As such, additional wetland and I or buffer enhancement shall be required as compensatory mitigation. Once wetland boundaries have been approved, the applicant shall be required to provide a restoration plan that provides additional enhancement to offset temporal and construction related impacts. Restoration plan shall be developed in accordance with the attached King County guidelines, "Sensitive Areas Mitigation / Restoration Plans for Wetlands, Wetland > Buffer, or Stream Buffer" and "Restoration & Enhancement of Sensitive Areas in King County" (2001).lA split rail fence (or approved other) installed at the buffe~s edge and poste8'with sensitive areas signs to preclude additional disturbance may be used to satisfy the additional enhancement requirement:-T 3. The wetland report recommends that "[b]ecause development will likely commence within the next year, we recommend that a monitoring schedule not be required. However, if the site is not developed, a 3-year monitoring program will be completed." King County restoration guidelines requires that (at least) a three year maintenance and monitoring program, including performance bond, be included with all restoration projects. Once wetland boundaries are approved, the applicant will be required to include a three year monitoring and maintenance plan within the required restoration plan. Additionally, a completed bond quantity worksheet shall be required prior to plan approval. LOCSINR 03/05/2003 Letter received form applicant requesting additional time till 5/13/03 to submit requested information. Request granted. Letter in file. Request also made for on site meeting. Will set up meeting after 3/11/03 so Jon Sloan can attend. LOCSINR 03/18/2003 Site meeting held today at request of applicant. Present were myself, Jon Sloan, Darcy Miller, Mark Stiefel, and Kulwait Sandhu. Meeting to discuss issues and verify wetland fiagging. Revised plans still to be submitted. LOCSINR 07/01/2003 Received on 6/27/03, 4 sets of revised grading, wetland mitigation plans, and response letter. Plans routed to Jon Sloan. SLOANJ 07/01/2003 WETL -reviewed revised plans rec'd 6/27/03. approved well routing station, sent notice on title to applicant, approved stamped plans, forwarded bond work to FGMU and set up bond file for LBRA. Conditions sent to RLOC 7/1/03. Note that sens areas approval of wetland/ buffer remediation plan is given prior to final revisions to grading plan; TESC changes being requested by RLOC will not affect the wetland I buffer remediation. Approved plans and bond qty wksht given to RLOC 7/1/03. LOCSINR 07/07/2003 grading bond quantity worksheet forwarded to stacy graves today. HINTZT 07/09/2003 Sent Bond Requirement Notification to FGMU LOCSINR 07/15/2003 plans approved. SANDINR 07/16/2003 Ready to issue letter to applicant. Payment of fees, post bonds, forms, notice on title. BROWNJOA 08/08/2003 Mr. Sanhu brought in all required ready to issue items. Permit issued, copy mailed to Mr. Sandhu LOCSINR 08/08/2003 Approved plans mailed to Mr. Sandhu today. LOCSINR 09/22/2003 Pre-conn held on site this morning. Due to vegetation growing, wetland fiags were hard to find. Told applicant that clearing limits need to be marked and approved by me prior to begining work. He will fiag them and let me know. LOCSINR 10/10/2003 Site inspection today. Stakes placed for clearing > limits/placement of silt fence. Clearing limits okay. Mr. Sandhu notified by phone. He will call me when they begin restoration. LOCSINR 11/03/2003 Stopped by site on friday 10/31/03. Work has not been done yet. Will call applicant to inquire as to when work will be done. LOCSINR 12/03/2003 Site inspection today. Silt fencing placed, re-grading of buffer area started. Small area outside identified restoration area cleared also. Culvert removed from channel. Will need this area stabilized. Placed phone call to applicant. LOCSINR 02/17/2004 Site visit done 2/11/04. Grading done. still need plantings to be done. will call applicant for small area needing erosion control. LOCSINR 06/01/2004 Site inspection done today per phone call from applicant that plantings have been done. Amount of shrubs placed are about half of what the number called for on the approved plans. Also, split rail fence has not been placed yet. Left phone message to applicant to call me back. LOCSINR 07/08/2004 Site inspection today at request of applicant. Per applicant, ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Seivices Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 (206) 296-6640 (206) 296-7055 Memorandum June 5, 2006 To: Mr. Sandhu l'.3 "1~1 1)8<1 SE 159th Pl /Renton, WA 98058 .J.o "PAv•"> ~l ~A<l-t i,;~o ~ lPG, SCZ.t) z..o Bu+ ,-l-,11 ~"EF.>f""'"""'l'!>i.-E.. -poiz. P~ ~1.., c.. • LD/ K !.l 1... w A-""'t -=,.. . --:, · 0(,,,. From: Lisa Brandt, Environmental Scientist II, DOES Re: Subject: A03 BN3 52-Sensitive Area Mitigation at 12044 SE 184th St. Monitoring Photos and Follow up Actions Dear Mr. Sandhu, Thank you for submitting the photographs of the mitigation area at the 184th St. project to document the mitigation area's progress in the monitoring period. As you state it is corning to the end of the monitoring period this fall. In reviewing the photographs the project appears to be doing well. The standards of success are 85% survival of the installed native plants. While it is unclear per the photos if this is being met, it does appear that uative plants in the area are lush and vigorous. Some Scott's broom is visible in the area which needs to be removed as this is a very invasive plant. I have attached an identification sheet to ensure you know what plant I am referring to. Any other non-native invasive plants must be controlled, like Himalayan blackbeny or Canadian Thistle. It also appears that the require split rail fence and sensitive area signs have not been installed per the approve plan dated July I, 2003. These need to be installed prior to the final inspection. Once the invasive species control and fence and sign installation has been completed, I would be glad to conduct a final inspection. Please contact me if you have questions or when the wmk is complete. I can be reached at Lisa.brandt@metrokc.gov or 206-296-6764. I look forward to helping you achieve bond release later this summer. Thank.you. Lisa Gillen, Nick From: Sent: To: Subject: Dye, Pete Tuesday, July 11, 2006 2:08 PM Gillen, Nick FW: L06SR020 Do you know what this means? The engineering plans are submitted but not yet routed to you. I presume the plat is also required to fence but maybe not mitigate for previous grading .. ??? Or is the plat responsible for closing out all previous violations .... From: Sent: To: Subject: Hello Pete, Brandt, Lisa Friday, July 07, 2006 5:29 PM Dye, Pete L06SR020 Mr. Kulwant Sandhu has called me regarding his mitigation bond held on this property. Seems he was the previous owner and sold it to Davis Real Estate. He thinks they may have permits requiring duplicate fencing of the mitigation area, that I am trying to get him to install under his bond A03NB344 and grading permit L02CG408. Could you just confirm that the Davis Real Estate Group has not been permitted or bonded for any of this mitigation work. I can not see this within permits plus. I will have to hold Mr. Sandhu responsible for finishing the mitigation under his bond, even though he sold the property and didn't' properly transfer bonds and permits. Thanks Lisa Lisa Brandt Environmental Scientist Land Use Services, ODES 900 Oakesdale Ave. Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5219 tel: 206-296-6764 fax: 206-296-7051 Lisa.brandt@metrokc.gov we.\-t 8, d ..., t:- .lf y-~ ,>w '!_ 1 ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Applicant: SANDHU, KULWANT Location: 12044 SE 184th St Site Address: Permit Type: G-INSPCT, Sub-Type: INSPSENS Title: SANDHU -REMOVAL OF FILL & REST Description: Billing for sensitive area review only for A03BN344 Permit Number: L03Gl166 Date Printed: 07-07-2006 Status: MONITOR Applied: 07/10/2003 Decision: 06/21/2005 The following holds, notices, and comments have been entered. HINTZT 07/10/2003 Routed to LBRA HINTZT 07/10/2003 Sent billing notification letter BRANDTL 07/10/2003 rec'd new file for mon. A03BN352 BRAN DTL 12/18/2003 inquire email exch per grading in wetld occuring on property at this time. Req. that NGil look into. BRANDTL 06/21/2005 Rev grading notes and found that in 10/04 Ramon had conducted three installation inspections related to the planting not his grading. I will change this into monitoring status and rv with Ramon. BRANDTL 06/24/2005 Mr. Sandhu called in and said they are just now working on phase two, he indicated that once that is done they will install the fence. We discussed bond reduction, transfer to new owner he decided it would be best to keep it at performance as the fence won't be installed until the end fall '06 and at that time all houses will be finished and plantings would be at end of year 3. He said they have been in the ground for 2 years as of this year, and only 2 died per his review, no invasives and they are watering plants regularly. On track. He will submit photos of the plantings for me in Sept. of this year for monitoring report. BRANDTL 01/04/2006 Rev file see little loss from cement above but no photos rec'd call back from Sandhu and he will send photos BRANDTL 06/05/2006 Rec;d photos from Sandhu just now for monitoring for last year, he was requesting release as bond expires he says in Sept. 2006. I will call or write about scott's broom in photos and need for fence on approved plan dated July 1, 2003 BRANDTL 06/05/2006 rec'd photos rev'd and approved but did see scott's broom and sent follow up letter requiring removal and install of fence and signs not seen prior to final inspection. -to Mr. Sandhu -attached letter in links BRANDTL 06/13/2006 rec'd letter sent back, had to re-address and remail. BRANDTL 07/07/2006 Kulwant -returned his call per letter and sold property. He didn't quite understand that even though he sold property he is responsible under bond for fence and sign installation. He thought as he sold it as-is with Jon Sloan and Ramon saying fence could be installed "later" with developement closer to completion that he would have to install it. He didn't transfer bonds (2) or grading permit to new owner "Davis REal Estate Group" under L06SR020---emailed Pete Dye due to confusion of double dipping with new owner ... but I know that is not likely the case. Kulwant will work witt new owner to get fence installed so his bond and grading permit can be finalled. Brandt, Lisa From: Sent: To: Subject: Hello Pete, Brandt, Lisa Friday, July 07, 2006 5:29 PM Dye, Pete L06SR020 Mr. Kulwant Sandhu has called me regarding his mitigation bond held on this property. Seems he was the previous owner and sold it to Davis Real Estate. He thinks they may have permits requiring duplicate fencing of the mitigation area, that I am trying to get him to install under his bond A03NB344 and grading permit L02CG408. Could you just confirm that the Davis Real Estate Group has not been permitted or bonded for any of this mitigation work. I can not see this within permits plus. I will have to hold Mr. Sandhu responsible for finishing the mitigation under his bond, even though he sold the property and didn't' properly transfer bonds and permits. Thanks Lisa Lisa Brandt Environmental Scientist Land Use Services, DOES 900 Oakesdale Ave. Southwest Renton, WA 98057-5219 tel: 206-296-6764 fax: 206-296-7051 Lisa.brandt@metrokc.gov 1 engineering submital comes in from David new owner. Nick will ensure review matches existing mitigation plan. Until bond and grading permit are transfered I reposted by new owner Davis, Sandhu is still responsible for fence, monitoring and maintenance. Could be that maint. is falling off as Sandhu thought he was done. -Full bond will remain to be held until fencing and owner transfer is done. BRANDTL 09/08/2006 Review with Kulwant Sandhu , I keep confusing him with Harijit Sandhu so I know billing is messed up, some. Reviewed the fact that new owners are going to put in fence and they have a permit which conditions fence install. ... need to verify this prior to release of this bond. Kulwant out of town 2 weeks and will try to schedule final insepction with him on return. BRANDTL 11/13/2006 Sandu called to review bond transfer process, I will inspect to verify plant conditions and see what new owners will be responsible for to post a main!. bond that would include a fence install. So bond should be no more than 50% reduction. lu_comm 5/16/05 ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Applicant: SANDHU, KULWANT Location: 12044 SE 184th St Site Address: Permit Type: G-INSPCT, Sub-Type: INSPSENS Title SANDHU -REMOVAL OF FILL & REST Description: Billing for sensitive area review only for A03BN352 Permit Number: L03Gl166 Date Printed: 11-13-2006 Status: MONITOR Applied: 07/10/2003 Decision: 06/21/2005 The following holds, notices, and comments have been entered. HI NTZT 07/10/2003 Routed to LBRA HI NTZT 07/10/2003 Sent billing notification letter BRANDTL 07/10/2003 rec'd new file for mon. A03BN352 BRANDTL 12/18/2003 inquire email exch per grading in wetld occuring on property at this time. Req. that NGil look into. BRANDTL 06/21/2005 Rev grading notes and found that in 10/04 Ramon had conducted three installation inspections related to the planting not his grading. I will change this into monitoring status and rv with Ramon. BRANDTL 06/24/2005 Mr. Sandhu called in and said they are just now working on phase two, he indicated that once that is done they will install the fence. We discussed bond reduction, transfer to new owner he decided it would be best to keep it at performance as the fence won't be installed until the end fall '06 and at that time all houses will be finished and plantings would be at end of year 3. He said they have been in the ground for 2 years as of this year, and only 2 died per his review, no invasives and they are watering plants regularly. On track. He will submit photos of the plantings for me in Sept. of this year for monitoring report. BRANDTL 01/04/2006 Rev file see little loss from cement above but no photos rec'd call back from Sandhu and he will send photos BRANDTL 06/05/2006 Rec;d photos from Sandhu just now for monitoring for last year, he was requesting release as bond expires he says in Sept. 2006. I will call or write about scott's broom in photos and need for fence on approved plan dated July 1, 2003 BRANDTL 06/05/2006 rec'd photos rev'd and approved but did see scott's broom and sent follow up letter requiring removal and install of fence and signs not seen prior to final inspection. -to Mr. Sandhu -attached letter in links BRANDTL 06/13/2006 rec'd letter sent back, had to re-address and remail. BRANDTL 07/07/2006 Kulwant -returned his call per letter and sold property. He didn't quite understand that even though he sold property he is responsible under bond for fence and sign installation. He thought as he sold it as-is with Jon Sloan and Ramon saying fence could be installed "late~' with developement closer to completion that he would have to install it. He didn't transfer bonds (2) or grading permit to new owner "Davis REal Estate Group" under L06SR020---emailed Pete Dye due to confusion of double dipping with new owner ... but I know that is not likely the case. Kulwant will work wilt new owner to get fence installed so his bond and grading permit can be finalled. BRANDTL 07/12/2006 Rev with Nick who will be reviewing plat conditions once ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Seniices Land Use Services Section 900 Oakesdale A venue Southwest Renton, WA 98055·1219 Project No: L02CG408 Date: July 16, 2003 GRADING/ CLEARING PERMIT Permit Type: GRADE Sub Type: GRADING Title: Description: Site Location: Applicant: Address: SANDHU RESTORATION REMOVAL OF FILL & RESTORATION OF WETLAND BUFFER 12044 SE 184™ ST. RENTON, WA 98058 KULW ANT SANDHU 13989 SE 159™ PL. RENTON, WA 98058 Owner's Name: Address: sns INSP;. RI.QC Submitted: 12/02/2002 Date Issued: C8·{)8-{)3 Expires: 0$-(),8 -01/ Parcel No.: 6199600320 SAME AS APPLICANT Please refer to the above Project Number when making inquiries regarding this application. For Permit information or requests for inspections, call 206-296-6640. -----------------------------------------------------------------CERTIFICATION---------------------------------------------------------------------- I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the information furnished by the owner or owner's agent in support of this application is true and correct. I further certify that all applicable King County requirements for the work authorized by this permit, if issued, will be met and that violation thereof will be cause for code enforcement action. 'I (g:LJ f. ~ Dw~ Owner I 11.ppli ••Mt Signature Title Date I have read the attached conditions of approval and understand that failure to comply with all conditions set forth herein shall necessitate an immediate work stoppage until such time as compliance with the stipulated conditions is attained. Failure to comply or repeated violations ofpennit conditions may result on enforcement actions, civil penalties as authorized under K.C.C. Title 23, and/or permit suspension or revocation. The granting of this permit shall not be construed as satisfying the requirements of other applicable Federal, State or Local government permits or regulations. The operation and maintenance of facilities authorized under this permit shall be conducted in accordance with the conditions contained herein and shall generally comply with all provisions of K.Cf .. 16.28 ffd on,rer applicable County Codes. f ~ .t A -tJ._ tJ yl)v2..y rt -~ -d .3 Owner I Applicant Signature Title Date ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Section 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Project No: L02CG408 Activitv No: Date: August 8, 2003 GRADING/CLEARING PERMIT CONDITIONS Permit Type: GRADE Sub Type: GRADING Title: SANDHU GRADING RESTORATION Submitted: 12-02-02 Description: Removal of fill and restoration of wetland buffer. Date Issued: 08·0,9-t)3 Site Location: 12004 S.E. 184'" St. Applicant: Address: Phone No.: Kulwant Sandhu 13989 S.E. 159'' Pl. Renton, WA 98058 425-226-8328 Other Information: Expires: tJ/3-0g-Ot/ Parcel No.: 619960 0320 Owner's Name: Sandhu Kulwant Address: Same Phone No.: Same Please refer to the above project number when making inquiries regarding this application. For Permit information or requests for inspections, call your Grading/Clearing Inspector at 206-296-7151. The conditions attached to this cover sheet apply to the permit referenced here. All conditions must be complied with hy the contractor and verified by your Grading/Clearing Inspector or this permit will become null and void. ~L Reviewed Date ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Service 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Clearing and Grading Review Tracking Number: L02CG408, SANDHU RESTORATION The following conditions apply to the above referenced permit: Permit Approval Conditions Document The permittee shall be responsible for all costs associated with the review and/or inspection of this permit by responsible department staff. These costs shall be in accordance with the fees set forth in King County Title 27. Failure to remain current with fee balances may be cause for suspension or revocation of the permit. July 15, 2003 Development authorized by this permit or approval may require other state and/or federal permits, including, but not limited to, a Washington State Hydraulics Project Approval (HPA) or a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 404 or Section 10 permit. If such other permit(s) is/are required, this/these other permits must be issued prior to issuance of this permit or approval. Failure to secure these other permits before beginning work authorized by this permit or approval is a violation of this condition, and may result in suspension or revocation of this permit/approval, and/or pursuing other enforcement actions. Should any other required permit be suspended, revoked or in anyway be subjected to other enforcement actions, this permit may be suspended until all defects causing said enforcement actions have been remedied. In addition, the granting of this permit or approval does not authorize the applicant to violate any provisions of the Endangered Species Act as set forth at 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531-1543, including the prohibition on the '1ake" of threatened or endangered species. "Take" is defined at 16 U.S.C. §§ 1532(19). I have read the attached conditions of approval and understand that failure to comply with all conditions set forth herein may necessitate an immediate work stoppage until such time as compliance with the stipulated conditions is attained. I certify that I have made a diligent inquiry regarding the need for concurrent state or federal permits to engage in the work authorized by this permit and no such permits are required or I have obtained the required permits. I understand that the granting of this permit shall not be construed as satisfying the requirements of other applicable Federal, State, or local laws or regulations. In addition, I understand and agree that this permit does not authorize the violation of the Endangered Species Act as set forth at 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531-1543, including the prohibition on the "take" of threatened or endangered species. "Take" is defined at 16 U.S.C. §§ 1532(19). I fully understand that it is my sole responsibility to determine whether such "take" restrictions would be violated by work done pursuant to this permit, and I understand that I am precluded by Federal Law from undertaking work authorized by this permit if that work would violate the "take" restrictions set forth at 16 U.S.C. §§ 1538, 50 C.F.R. §§ 17.31, 50 C.F.R. §§ 223 and 50 C.F.R. §§ 224. Signed _:-=-~--'-----'--"-==1-----<tgo....oa""',,_,,""'~""""'-'=::_ Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions Sandhu Restoration, DDES file L02CG405 -I - Date CLEARING/GRADING REVIEW CONDITIONS: 5000 - 5005 - 5025 - 5035 - 5050 - 5060 - 5070 - 5085 - At least 48 hours prior to the start of any work, call the Site Development Services Section to arrange a pre-construction meeting. Please be advised this permit shall not be effective until the Notice to Proceed has been issued pursuant to this meeting. If required, Notice of Construction Activity signs shall be in place prior to the pre- construction meeting. The boundaries of the clearing limits shown on this plan shall be clearly flagged in the field prior to construction. No clearing or grading shall take place until these limits are approved in the field by DDES staff. During the construction period, no disturbance beyond the flagged clearing limits shall be permitted. The flagging shall be maintained by the permittee for the duration of construction. If work is to be suspended for 30 or more consecutive calendar days, permittee shall notify the Site Development Services Section prior to the cessation of work indicating their intention to do so and also prior to restarting operations. Work shall be limited to that shown on the approved plans dated July 15, 2003. A copy of the approved plans, conditions and permit must be on the job site whenever work is in progress. All work shall comply with the provisions of King County Ordinance 3139, relating to noise control. Hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays. Hours of operation may be further restricted during peak traffic hours. Permittee shall abide by the regulations of the Puget Sound Clean Air Act (PSCAA). You must call 1-800-424-5555 not less than 48 hours before beginning excavation where any underground utilities may be located. Failure to do so could Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions Sandhu Restoration, DDES file L02CG405 -2 - mean bearing substantial repair costs (up to three times the cost of repairs to the service). 5115 -Stockpile and staging areas shall not be located within sensitive areas or their buffers. They shall have TESC measures adequate to prevent any surface waters that are or might be concentrated from carrying sediment from the site to a natural watercourse. DDES may require a restoration plan be submitted for review and approval for any stockpiling or staging areas associated with the permit. Staging and stockpiling areas may be located on existing access roads. 5125 -Cut/fill slopes shall be no steeper than is safe for the intended use and shall not exceed 2 foot horizontal to 1 foot vertical unless otherwise approved by DDES. 5240 -If the contractor chooses to dispose of excess excavated material on sites where less than 100 cubic yards and 3 feet of fill will be placed, the contractor shall provide documentation that these sites have been inspected by a consultant capable of identifying sensitive areas as defined by King County Code. The report shall include date of inspection, name of consultant and company, an assessor's map of the parcel, the name, address and phone number of the property owner, and the location of the fill placed on the property. No fill shall be placed in sensitive areas or their buffers on these sites. 5260 -Turbidity caused by construction activities from this project shall not exceed Washington State water quality standards. Sediment larger than 0.075 mm shall not leave the site or enter on site wetlands, streams, lakes or other natural drainage features or existing constructed drainage systems which outlet to natural drainage features. 5275 -In the event that the permittee encounters areas needing de-watering that have not been indicated on the approved plans, work, except for erosion control as needed to remedy unforeseen water quality problems, shall not commence nor continue Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions Sandhu Restoration, DDES file L02CG405 -3 - 5300 - 5310 - 5315 - 5320 - 5350 - 5375 - 5450 until a de-watering plan, approved by King County DDES, is obtained. If gravel is used to fill in the trench for keying in the filter fabric fence, rather than native backfill, the gravel shall be washed and clean. The ESC facilities shown on this plan must be constructed in conjunction with all clearing and grading activities, and in such a manner as to ensure that sediment-laden water does not enter the drainage system or violate applicable water standards. (KCC 9.04.090, KCC 9.12.025) The ESC facilities shown on this plan are the minimum requirements for anticipated site conditions. During the construction period, these ESC facilities shall be upgraded (e.g. additional sumps, relocation of ditches and silt fences, etc.) as needed for unexpected storm events. The ESC facilities shall be inspected daily by the permittee and maintained as necessary to ensure their continued functioning. Where straw mulch for temporary erosion control is required, it shall be applied at a minimum thickness of 2 inches. Any areas of exposed soils, including roadway embankments, that will not be disturbed for two days during the wet season (October 1 to March 31) or seven days during the dry season (April 1 to September 30) shall be immediately stabilized with approved TESC measures (e.g., seeding, mulching, plastic covering, etc.) If a King County Community Plan and/or Basin Plan or the Depart. of Ecology Stormwater Manual have more conservative timelines for implementation of erosion control measures, the more stringent timelines shall apply. During hauling operations, permittee shall provide effective dust control measures consisting of water, asphalt treated base, chemical dust palliatives, or equivalent measures to control dust from this operation (KCC 21A.22.070.C). Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions Sandhu Restoration, DDES file L02CG405 -4 - 5460 - 5555 - 5570 - 6000 - 6010 - 6020 - Permittee shall be responsible for implementing all appropriate measures needed (i.e. paving, sweepers, and/or other techniques) to keep streets and roads used as haul routes for export or import of material clean and free from debris, mud, etc. R5465 -Permittee shall provide a wheel wash facility and a paved access road between the wheel wash location and public road as directed by DDES. No additional filling and/or excavation is authorized under this approval. Failure to comply with any of the conditions contained within this permit shall be immediate cause for suspension of the permit and fines and penalties pursuant to King County Code Title 21A, and 23 and Chapters 9.04, 9.12, and 16.82. Temporary construction access shall be placed with a culvert sized properly to maintain surface flows in the exiting ditch. Erosion control best management practices (bmp's) shall be provided upon construction of this temporary access. Upon completion of construction, temporary access and culvert shall be removed. BMP's for erosion control shall be provided for removal and stabilization of area disturbed. Load disposal receipts must be provided to the Site Development Services (SDS) Section for ALL soils removed from the site. These receipts must be submitted to the DDES SDS section on a weekly basis. No summaries of disposal activities will be accepted in lieu of disposal receipts. Failure to provide said disposal receipts may lead to forfeiture of the required grading permit bond. CRITICAL AREA REVIEW CONDITIONS: 1. Standards. All work and materials shall conform to King County standards and specifications, and to the specifications and details shown on these plans. 2. King County DDES Contact. Certain actions within this mitigation I restoration plan require inspection or approval by King County sensitive areas staff. Requests for inspection / approval shall be coordinated through Jon Sloan, King County DOES Environmental Scientist, (206) 296-7158. Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions Sandhu Restoration, DDES file L02CG405 -5 - 3. Contractor Information. When it is available, contact information shall be provided to DOES that includes names, addresses and phone numbers of persons / firms that will be responsible for grading the mitigation area, installing required plants, and performing required maintenance and monitoring. 4. Contractor's qualifications. Contractor/ Landscape Installer must be experienced in mitigation and restoration work. The Permittee shall provide that there is one person on the site at all times during work and installation who is thoroughly familiar with the type of materials being installed and the best methods for their installation, and who shall direct all work being performed under these specifications. This person shall be experienced in installing native plant materials for wetland mitigation or restoration projects, unless otherwise allowed by the Landscape Designer, Biologist and/ or King County DOES Environmental Scientist. 5. Site conditions. The Permittee, Landscape Designer and/ or Project Biologist shall immediately notify King County ODES of any discrepancies between these plans and the site conditions. The locations of plants shown may be modified in the field by the Landscape Designer, Project Biologist and / or King County DOES Environmental Scientist based on field conditions at the time of planting. Changes should be documented and as-built drawings submitted to DOES upon request for formal construction approval. 6. Timing. Plants specified in approved plans shall be installed in the dormant season. All grading work shall be performed during the dry season, June 1 -September 30. 7. Plants. Plants in number and size are required in accordance with approved plans. A. Origin. Plant materials shall be native plants, nursery grown in the Puget Sound area of Washington. Dug plants may only be used upon approval of King County DOES Environmental Scientist. B. Handling. Plants shall be handled so as to avoid all damage, including breaking, bruising, root damage, sunburn, drying, freezing or other injury. Plants must be covered during transport. Plants shall not be bound with wire or rope in a manner that could damage branches. Protect plant roots with shade and wet soil in the time period between delivery and installation. Do not lift container stock by trunks, stems, or tops. Do not remove from containers until ready to plant. Water all plants as necessary to keep moisture levels appropriate to the species horticultural requirements. Plants shall not be allowed to dry out. All plants shall be watered thoroughly immediately upon installation. Soak all containerized plants thoroughly prior to installation. Bare root plants are subject to the following special requirements, and shall not be used unless planted between November 1 and March 1, and only with the permission of the Landscape Designer and King County DOES Environmental Scientist. Bare root plants must have enough fibrous root to insure plant survival. Roots must be covered at all times with mud and/or wet straw, moss, or other suitable packing material until Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions Sandhu Restoration, DDES file L02CG405 -6 - time of installation. Plants whose roots have dried out from exposure will not be accepted at installation inspection. C. Storage. Plants stored by the Permittee for longer than one month prior to planting shall be planted in nursery rows, and treated in a manner suitable to that species horticultural requirements. Plants must be reinspected by the Project Biologist and/ or Landscape Designer prior to installation. D. Damaged plants. Damaged dried out, or otherwise mishandled plants will be rejected at installation inspection. All rejected plants shall be immediately removed from the site. E. Plant Names. Plant names shall comply with those generally accepted in the native plant nursery trade. Any question regarding plant species or variety shall be referred to the Landscape Designer, Project Biologist or King County DOES Environmental Scientist ( contact: Jon Sloan, 206/296-7158). All plant materials shall be true to species and variety and legibly tagged. F. Plant substitutions. Plant substitutions are not permitted without the permission of the Landscape Designer, Project Biologist and/or King County ODES Environmental Scientist. Same species substitutions oflarger size do not require special permission. However, small plants often experience less transplant shock and adapt more quickly to site conditions, resulting in a higher success rate. As such, smaller plants will be approved as substitutions based on certain site-specific conditions (trees not less than 1 gallon size however). G. Quality and condition. Plants shall be normal in pattern of growth, healthy, well- branched, vigorous, with well-developed root systems, and free of pests and diseases. Damaged, diseased, pest-infested, scraped, bruised, dried out, burned, broken, or defective plants will be rejected. Plants with pruning wounds over I" in diameter will be rejected. H. Roots. All plants shall be balled and burlapped or containerized, unless explicitly authorized by the Landscape Designer and/ or Project Biologist. Rootbound plants or B&B plants with damaged, cracked or loose rootballs (major damage) will be rejected. Immediately before installation, plants' with minor root damage ( some broken and / or twisted roots) must be root-pruned. Matted or circling roots of containerized plantings must be pruned or straightened and the sides of the root ball must be roughened from top to bottom to a depth of approximately half an inch in two to four places. Bare root plantings of woody material is allowed only with permission from the Landscape Designer, Project Biologist and/ or King County DDES Environmental Scientist. I. Sizes. Plant sizes shall be the size indicated in the plant schedule. Larger stock may be acceptable provided that it has not been cut back to size specified, and that the Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions Sandhu Restoration, DDES file L02CG405 -7 - root ball is proportionate to the size of the plant. Smaller stock may be acceptable, and under some circumstances preferable, based on site-specific conditions. Measurements, caliper, branching and balling and burlapping shall conform to the American Standard of Nursery Stock by the American Association of Nurserymen (latest edition). J. Form. Evergreen trees, if used, shall have single trunks and symmetrical, well- developed form. Deciduous trees shall be single trunked unless specified as multi- stem in the plan schedule. Shrubs shall have multiple stems, and be well-branched. K. Planting. Planting shall be done in accordance with illustrated details in the mitigation I restoration plan set and accepted industry standards. L. Timing of Planting. Unless otherwise approved by King County DDES Environmental Scientist, all planting shall occur between September 15 and January 15. Overall, the earlier plants go into the ground in the fall, the more time they have to adapt to the site and extend their root systems before the water demands of spring and summer. M. Weeding. Existing and exotic vegetation in the mitigation and buffer areas will be hand weeded from around all newly installed plants at the time of installation and on routine basis through monitoring period. No chemical control of vegetation on any portion of the site is allowed without the written permission of King County DDES Environmental Scientist. N. Soil Amendments. Unless otherwise specified and approved by King County DDES, organic matter (Cedar Grove Pure Compost or approved equal) will be incorporated into the entire planting site, not including areas inside the dripline of existing trees and shrubs. One unit of loose, well-composted organic material should be incorporated with two units of loose soil to a depth of eight to ten inches ( only three to four inches within three feet of existing drip lines) and mixed thoroughly. 0. Mulch. All landscaped areas denuded of vegetation and soil surface surrounding all planting pit areas shall receive no less than 2" -4" of organic compost or certified weed free straw after planting. Compost or certified weed-free straw shall be kept well away (at least 2") from the trunks and stems of woody plants. Compost shall be Cedar Grove Pure Compost or approved equal. No bark products or sawdust will be permitted. P. Site conditions. Contractor shall immediately notify the Landscape Designer and/ or Project Biologist of drainage or soil conditions likely to be detrimental to the growth or survival of plants. Planting operations shall not be conducted under the following conditions: freezing weather, when the ground is frozen, excessively wet weather, excessively windy weather, or in excessive heat. Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions Sandhu Restoration, DDES file L02CG405 -8 - Q. Plant locations. Locations shall be as depicted in the approved plan set. The Landscape Designer and/ or Project Biologist may change the locations of plantings shown on plans based on field conditions. R. Planting in pits. Planting pits shall be circular or square with vertical sides, and shall be 6" deeper and 12" larger in diameter than the root ball of the plant. Break up the sides of the pit in compacted soils. Set plants upright in pits, as illustrated in planting detail. Burlap shall be removed from the planting pit. Backfill shall be worked back into holes such that air pockets are removed without adversely compacting down soils. S. Fertilizer. Slow release fertilizer may be used if pre-approved by King County DDES Environmental Scientist. Fertilizers shall be applied only at the base of plantings underneath the required covering of mulch (that does not make contact with stems of the plants). No soil amendment or fertilizers will be placed in planting holes. T. Water. Plants shall be watered midway through backfilling, and again upon completion of backfilling. For spring plantings (if approved), a rim of earth shall be mounded around the base of the tree or shrub no closer than the drip line, or no less than 30" in diameter, except on steep slopes or in hollows, as illustrated in planting detail. Plants shall be watered a second time within 24-48 hours after installation. The earthen rim/ dam should be leveled prior to the second growing season. U. Staking. Most shrubs and many trees DO NOT require any staking. If the plant can stand alone without staking in a moderate wind, do not use a stake. If the plant needs support, then strapping or webbing should be used as low as possible on the trunk to loosely brace the tree with two stakes (see Planting Detail). Do not brace the tree tightly or too high on the trunk. If the tree is unable to sway, it will further lose the ability to support itself. Do not use wire in a rubber hose for strapping as it exerts too much pressure on the bark. As soon as supporting the plant becomes unnecessary, remove the stakes. All stakes must be removed within two (2) years of installation. V. Intermediate Inspections. All plants shall be inspected and approved by the Landscape Designer and/ or Project Biologist prior to installation. Condition of roots of a random sample of plants will be inspected, as well as all aboveground growth on all plants. Roots of any bare root plants, if permitted for use, will be inspected. Plant material may be approved at the source, at the discretion of the Landscape Designer and/ or Project Biologist, but all material must be re-inspected and approved on the site prior to installation. Plant locations shall also be inspected and approved prior to planting. W. Wildlife Control. As determined by the Landscape Designer, and/ or the Project Biologist, fencing may be needed to limit deer intrusion while installed plants are becoming established. Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions Sandhu Restoration, DDES file L02CG405 -9 - 8. Seeding. Seeding shall be required only as described in approved plans. A. Timing. Contractor shall insure that areas to receive seed are clean of debris and that final grades are correct. Seeding shall be performed after other plant installation is complete. Seeding is the final step of the initial installation; site shall be closed to all vehicles and foot traffic shall be minimized after seeding is complete. Seeding shall not take place when the ground is frozen or in windy weather. Seeds shall be hand broadcast or by mechanical hand powered spreader, with as even distribution as feasible. Areas within 6"-12" of stems of installed plants shall not be seeded. B. Seed mix. Use specified native mix at rate specified. All seed materials shall be free of weed seeds or other foreign matter detrimental to plant growth. NOTE: Seed mix should be ordered as early as possible to insure an adequate supply of specified native seed. C. Post seeding erosion control. Temporary erosion and sediment control facilities shall be provided in accordance with approved plans AND Appendix D of the King County Surface Water Design Manual (1997) .. 9. Maintenance. Maintenance shall be required in accordance with King County Sensitive Areas Mitigation Guidelines (2002) and approved plans. A. Survival. The Permittee shall be responsible for the health of I 00% of all newly installed plants for one growing season after installation has been accepted by King County DDES Environmental Scientist (see Performance Standards). A growing season for these purposes is defined as occurring from spring to spring (March 15 to March 15, following year). For fall installation ( often required), the growing season will begin the following spring. The Permittee shall replace any plants that are failing, weak, defective in manner of growth, or dead during this growing season, as directed by the Landscape Designer, Project Biologist, and/ or King County DDES Environmental Scientist. B. Installation Timing for Replacement Plants. Replacement plants shall be installed between September 15 and January 15, unless otherwise determined by the Landscape Designer, Project Biologist, and/or King County DDES Environmental Scientist. C. Duration and Extent. In order to achieve performance standards, the Permittee shall have the mitigation area maintained for the duration of the monitoring period, THREE (3) years. Maintenance will include watering, weeding around base of installed plants, pruning, replacement, restaking, removal of all classes of noxious weeds (see Washington State Noxious Weeds List, WAC 16-750-005) as well as Himalayan blackberry, and any other measures needed to insure plant survival. All maintenance shall be directed by the Landscape Designer and/ or Project Biologist. Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions Sandhu Restoration, DDES file L02CG405 -10 - D. Standards for Replacement Plants. Replacement plants shall meet the same standards for size and type as those specified for original installation unless otherwise directed by the Landscape Designer, Project Biologist, and /or King County DDES Environmental Scientist. Replacement plants shall be inspected as described above for the original installation. E. Replanting. Plants that have settled in their planting pits too deep, too shallow, loose, or crooked shall be replanted as directed by the Landscape Designer, Project Biologist, and/ or King County DDES Environmental Scientist. F. Herbicides/ Pesticides. Chemical controls shall not be used in the mitigation/ restoration area, sensitive areas or their buffers. G. Irrigation/ Watering. Water shall be provided during the dry season (July 1 - October 15) for the first two years after installation to ensure plant survival and establishment. Water should be provided by a temporary above ground irrigation system and/ or a water truck. Water should be applied at a rate of 1" of water two times a week for year 1 and l" of water one time a week during year 2. H. General. The Permittee shall include in general maintenance activities the replacement of any vandalized or damaged signs, habitat features, fences or other structural component of the mitigation site. 10. Performance Standards -Plant Cover and Survival. Plant survival and cover standards are established to measure mitigation success within planted areas as follows: Performance Standards Year One Year Two Year Three Year Five Shrub and SaplinQ Tree Cover* >15% >30% >40% Shrub and Saplinq Tree Survival 100% >85% >80% Herbaceous Cover* >60% >80% >90% Herbaceous Survival 100% >85% *Includes beneficial native plants in that category that are naturally recruiting 11. Monitoring. Monitoring shall be conducted annually for THREE (3) years. A. Vegetation Monitoring. Sampling points or transects will be established for vegetation monitoring, and photo-points established from which photos will be taken throughout the monitoring period. Linear transects are the preferred method for vegetation monitoring for this site. No less than one (1) 25-meter transect will be established in the restoration area. Permanent transect location(s) must be identified on restoration site plans in the first monitoring report (they may be drawn on approved restoration plans by hand). Each transect shall detail herb, shrub, and tree aerial cover at radii of Im, 5m, and !Om respectively, using the Braun-Blanquet releve method or other acceptable field method. Monitoring of vegetation transects shall occur Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions Sandhu Restoration, DDES file L02CG405 -11 - >50% >75% >90% annually between May 15 and September 30 (prior to leaf drop), unless otherwise specified. B. Photopoints. No less than one (I) permanent photopoints will be established within the mitigation/ restoration area. Photographs will be taken from these points to visually record the condition of the mitigation I restoration area. Photos shall be taken annually between May 15 and September 30 (prior to leaf drop), unless otherwise specified. C. Reports. Monitoring reports shall be submitted by December 31 of each year during the monitoring period. As applicable, monitoring reports must include description / data for: site plan and location map; historic description of project, including date of installation, current year of monitoring, restatement of mitigation/ restoration goals, and performance standards; plant survival, vigor, and aerial coverage from every plant community (transect data), and explanation of monitoring methodology in the context of assessing performance standards; slope condition, site stability, any structures or special features; buffer conditions, e.g. surrounding land use, use by humans, wild and domestic creatures; observed wildlife, including amphibians, avians, and others; assessment of nuisance/ exotic biota and recommendations for management; receipts for off-site disposal of any dumping, weeds, or invasive plants; receipts for any structural repair or replacement; 4" x 6" color photographs taken from permanent photo-points as shown on Monitoring Plan; and, summary of maintenance and contingency measures proposed for next season and completed for past season. D. Deficiencies. Any deficiency discovered during any monitoring OR inspection visit must be corrected within 60 days. E. Contingency Plan. Should any monitoring report reveal the mitigation has failed in whole or in part, and should that failure be beyond the scope ofroutine maintenance, a Contingency Plan will be submitted. The Contingency Plan may range in complexity from a list of plants substituted, to cross- sections of proposed engineered structures. Once approved, it may be installed, and will replace the approved mitigation plan. If the failure is substantial, King County DDES may extend the monitoring period for that mitigation. 12. Bond. Prior to beginning any work, the Permittee must provide a restoration bond or assignment of funds per King County procedures. A bond quantity worksheet has been completed based on all elements of the Mitigation/ Restoration Plan. The total cost, plus contingency fees has been determined to be $14,077.83, which will be the amount of the restoration bond the Permittee is required to provide. Note that the approved bond will include required start date for mitigation construction. Bonds are eligible for reduction to maintenance status as soon as successful installation inspection has occurred and compliance with permit conditions and King County Sensitive Area Mitigation Guidelines (October 2000) is verified by King County DDES. Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions Sandhu Restoration, DDES file L02CG405 -12 - ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Section 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055·1219 Project No: L02CG408 Date: July 16, 2003 GRADING/ CLEARING PERMIT Permit Type: GRADE Sub Type: GRADING Title: Description: Site Location: Applicant: Address: SANDHU RESTORATION REMOVAL OF FILL & RESTORATION OF WETLAND BUFFER 12044 SE 184™ ST. RENTON, WA 98058 KULWANTSANDHU 13989 SE 159TH PL. RENTON, WA 98058 Owner's Name: Address: SDS INSP;. RI,QC Submitted: 12/02/2002 Date Issued: C8-0$-0.3 Expires: 08-08 -t?I/ Parcel No.: 6199600320 SAME AS APPLICANT Please refer to the above Project Number when making inquiries regarding this application. For Permit information or requests for inspections, call 206-296-6640. ---------------------------------------------------------------CERTIFICATION--------------------------------------------------------------------- I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the information furnished by the owner or owner's agent in support of this application is true and correct. I further certify that all applicable King County requirements for the work authorized by this permit, if issued, will be met and that violation thereof will be cause for code enforcement action. 1-f5<(LJ 5'. ~ bw~ Owner/ A.ppJ.iHFK Signature Title Date I have read the attached conditions of approval and understand that failure to comply with all conditions set forth herein shall necessitate an immediate work stoppage until such time as compliance with the stipulated conditions is attained. Failure to comply or repeated violations of permit conditions may result on enforcement actions, civil penalties as authorized under K.C.C. Title 23, and/or permit suspension or revocation. The granting of this permit shall not be construed as satisfying the requirements of other applicable Federal, State or Local goverrunent permits or regulations. The operation and maintenance of facilities authorized under this permit shall be conducted in accordance with the conditions contained herein and shall generally comply with all provisions of K.C,C._ 16.28 }rd oili,er applicable County Codes. f -~-=-=-_c__::c:..__::c.L..~,.,_.,_? _.J;.=a=·=.-(/._= {) ~ fr -fl -d -3 Owner/ Applicant Signature Title Date ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Section 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-12!9 Project No: L02CG408 Activitv No: Date: August 8, 2003 GRADING/CLEARING PERMIT CONDITIONS Permit Type: GRADE Sub Type: GRADING Title: SANDHU GRADING RESTORATION Submitted: 12-02-02 Description: Removal of till and restoration of wetland buffer. Date Issued: 08·08-(J.3 Site Location: 12004 S.E. 184" St. Applicant: Address: Phone No.: Kulwant Sandhu 13989 S.E. 159'" Pl. Renton, WA 98058 425-226-8328 Other Information: Expires: t>/J-C,g ~()(/ Parcel No.: 619960 0320 Owner's Name: Sandhu Kulwant Address: Same Phone No.: Same Please refer to the above project number when making inquiries regarding this application. For Permit information or requests for inspections, call your Grading/Clearing Inspector at 206-296-7151. The conditions attached to this cover sheet apply to the permit referenced here. All conditions must be complied with by the contractor and verified by your Grading/Clearing Inspector or this permit will become null and void. ~L Date ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Service 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA98055-1219 Clearing and Grading Review Tracking Number: L02CG408, SANDHU RESTORATION The following conditions apply to the above referenced permit: Permit Approval Conditions Document The permittee shall be responsible for all costs associated with the review and/or inspection ofthis permit by responsible department staff. These costs shall be in accordance with the fees set forth in King County Title 27. Failure to remain current with fee balances may be cause for suspension or revocation of the permit. July 15, 2003 Development authorized by this permit or approval may require other state and/or federal permits, including, but not limited to, a Washington State Hydraulics Project Approval (HPA) or a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 404 or Section IO permit. If such other permit( s) is/are required, this/these other permits must be issued prior to issuance of this permit or approval. Failure to secure these other permits before beginning work authorized by this permit or approval is a violation of this condition, and may result in suspension or revocation of this permit/approval, and/or pursuing other enforcement actions. Should any other required permit be suspended, revoked or in anyway be subjected to other enforcement actions, this permit may be suspended until all defects causing said enforcement actions have been remedied. In addition, the granting of this permit or approval does not authorize the applicant to violate any provisions of the Endangered Species Act as set forth at 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531-1543, including the prohibition on the "take" of threatened or endangered species. "Take" is defined at 16 U.S.C. §§ 1532(19). I have read the attached conditions of approval and understand that failure to comply with all conditions set forth herein may necessitate an immediate work stoppage until such time as compliance with the stipulated conditions is attained. I certify that I have made a diligent inquiry regarding the need for concurrent state or federal permits to engage in the work authorized by this permit and no such permits are required or I have obtained the required permits. I understand that the granting of this permit shall not be construed as satisfying the requirements of other applicable Federal, State, or local laws or regulations. In addition, I understand and agree that this permit does not authorize the violation of the Endangered Species Act as set forth at 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531-1543, including the prohibition on the "take" of threatened or endangered species. "Take" is defined at 16 U.S.C. §§ 1532(19). I fully understand that it is my sole responsibility to determine whether such "take" restrictions would be violated by work done pursuant to this permit, and I understand that I am precluded by Federal Law from undertaking work authorized by this permit if that work would violate the "take" restrictions set forth at 16 U.S.C. §§ 1538, 50 C.F.R. §§ 17.31, 50 C.F.R. §§ 223 and 50 C.F.R. §§ 224. Signed tUJ Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions Sandhu Restoration, DDES file L02CG405 -1 - Date CLEARING/GRADING REVIEW CONDITIONS: 5000 - 5005 - 5025 - 5035 - 5050 - 5060 - 5070 - 5085 - At least 48 hours prior to the start of any work, call the Site Development Services Section to arrange a pre-construction meeting. Please be advised this permit shall not be effective until the Notice to Proceed has been issued pursuant to this meeting. If required, Notice of Construction Activity signs shall be in place prior to the pre- construction meeting. The boundaries of the clearing limits shown on this plan shall be clearly flagged in the field prior to construction. No clearing or grading shall take place until these limits are approved in the field by DDES staff. During the construction period, no disturbance beyond the flagged clearing limits shall be permitted. The flagging shall be maintained by the permittee for the duration of construction. If work is to be suspended for 30 or more consecutive calendar days, permittee shall notify the Site Development Services Section prior to the cessation of work indicating their intention to do so and also prior to restarting operations. Work shall be limited to that shown on the approved plans dated July 15, 2003. A copy of the approved plans, conditions and permit must be on the job site whenever work is in progress. All work shall comply with the provisions of King County Ordinance 3139, relating to noise control. Hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays. Hours of operation may be further restricted during peak traffic hours. Permittee shall abide by the regulations of the Puget Sound Clean Air Act (PSCAA). You must call 1-800-424-5555 not less than 48 hours before beginning excavation where any underground utilities may be located. Failure to do so could Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions Sandhu Restoration, DDES file L02CG405 -2 - mean bearing substantial repair costs (up to three times the cost of repairs to the service). 5115 -Stockpile and staging areas shall not be located within sensitive areas or their buffers. They shall have TESC measures adequate to prevent any surface waters that are or might be concentrated from carrying sediment from the site to a natural watercourse. DDES may require a restoration plan be submitted for review and approval for any stockpiling or staging areas associated with the permit. Staging and stockpiling areas may be located on existing access roads. 5125 -Cut/fill slopes shall be no steeper than is safe for the intended use and shall not exceed 2 foot horizontal to 1 foot vertical unless otherwise approved by DDES. 5240 -If the contractor chooses to dispose of excess excavated material on sites where less than 100 cubic yards and 3 feet of fill will be placed, the contractor shall provide documentation that these sites have been inspected by a consultant capable of identifying sensitive areas as defined by King County Code. The report shall include date of inspection, name of consultant and company, an assessor's map of the parcel, the name, address and phone number of the property owner, and the location of the fill placed on the property. No fill shall be placed in sensitive areas or their buffers on these sites. 5260 -Turbidity caused by construction activities from this project shall not exceed Washington State water quality standards. Sediment larger than 0.075 mm shall not leave the site or enter on site wetlands, streams, lakes or other natural drainage features or existing constructed drainage systems which outlet to natural drainage features. 5275 -In the event that the permittee encounters areas needing de-watering that have not been indicated on the approved plans, work, except for erosion control as needed to remedy unforeseen water quality problems, shall not commence nor continue Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions Sandhu Restoration, DDES file L02CG405 -3 - 5300 - 5310 - 5315 - 5320 - 5350 - 5375 - 5450 until a de-watering plan, approved by King County DDES, is obtained. If gravel is used to fill in the trench for keying in the filter fabric fence, rather than native backfill, the gravel shall be washed and clean. The ESC facilities shown on this plan must be constructed in conjunction with all clearing and grading activities, and in such a manner as to ensure that sediment-laden water does not enter the drainage system or violate applicable water standards. (KCC 9.04.090, KCC 9.12.025) The ESC facilities shown on this plan are the minimum requirements for anticipated site conditions. During the construction period, these ESC facilities shall be upgraded (e.g. additional sumps, relocation of ditches and silt fences, etc.) as needed for unexpected storm events. The ESC facilities shall be inspected daily by the permittee and maintained as necessary to ensure their continued functioning. Where straw mulch for temporary erosion control is required, it shall be applied at a minimum thickness of 2 inches. Any areas of exposed soils, including roadway embankments, that will not be disturbed for two days during the wet season (October 1 to March 31) or seven days during the dry season (April 1 to September 30) shall be immediately stabilized with approved TESC measures (e.g., seeding, mulching, plastic covering, etc.) If a King County Community Plan and/or Basin Plan or the Depart. of Ecology Stormwater Manual have more conservative timelines for implementation of erosion control measures, the more stringent timelines shall apply. During hauling operations, permittee shall provide effective dust control measures consisting of water, asphalt treated base, chemical dust palliatives, or equivalent measures to control dust from this operation (KCC 21A.22.070.C). Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions Sandhu Restoration, DDES file L02CG405 -4- 5460 - 5555 - 5570 - 6000 - 6010 - 6020 - Permittee shall be responsible for implementing all appropriate measures needed (i.e. paving, sweepers, and/or other techniques) to keep streets and roads used as haul routes for export or import of material clean and free from debris, mud, etc. R5465 -Permittee shall provide a wheel wash facility and a paved access road between the wheel wash location and public road as directed by DDES. No additional filling and/or excavation is authorized under this approval. Failure to comply with any of the conditions contained within this permit shall be immediate cause for suspension of the permit and fines and penalties pursuant to King County Code Title 21A, and 23 and Chapters 9.04, 9.12, and 16.82. Temporary construction access shall be placed with a culvert sized properly to maintain surface flows in the exiting ditch. Erosion control best management practices (bmp's) shall be provided upon construction of this temporary access. Upon completion of construction, temporary access and culvert shall be removed. BMP's for erosion control shall be provided for removal and stabilization of area disturbed. Load disposal receipts must be provided to the Site Development Services (SDS) Section for ALL soils removed from the site. These receipts must be submitted to the DDES SDS section on a weekly basis. No summaries of disposal activities will be accepted in lieu of disposal receipts. Failure to provide said disposal receipts may lead to forfeiture of the required grading permit bond. CRITICAL AREA REVIEW CONDITIONS: 1. Standards. All work and materials shall conform to King County standards and specifications, and to the specifications and details shown on these plans. 2. King County DDES Contact. Certain actions within this mitigation/ restoration plan require inspection or approval by King County sensitive areas staff. Requests for inspection I approval shall be coordinated through Jon Sloan, King County DDES Environmental Scientist, (206) 296-7158. Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions Sandhu Restoration, DDES file L02CG405 -5 - 3. Contractor Information. When it is available, contact information shall be provided to DDES that includes names, addresses and phone numbers of persons I firms that will be responsible for grading the mitigation area, installing required plants, and performing required maintenance and monitoring. 4. Contractor's qualifications. Contractor/ Landscape Installer must be experienced in mitigation and restoration work. The Permittee shall provide that there is one person on the site at all times during work and installation who is thoroughly familiar with the type of materials being installed and the best methods for their installation, and who shall direct all work being performed under these specifications. This person shall be experienced in installing native plant materials for wetland mitigation or restoration projects, unless otherwise allowed by the Landscape Designer, Biologist and/ or King County DDES Environmental Scientist. 5. Site conditions. The Permittee, Landscape Designer and/ or Project Biologist shall immediately notify King County DDES of any discrepancies between these plans and the site conditions. The locations of plants shown may be modified in the field by the Landscape Designer, Project Biologist and/ or King County DDES Environmental Scientist based on field conditions at the time of planting. Changes should be documented and as-built drawings submitted to DDES upon request for formal construction approval. 6. Timing. Plants specified in approved plans shall be installed in the dormant season. All grading work shall be performed during the dry season, June I -September 30. 7. Plants. Plants in number and size are required in accordance with approved plans. A. Origin. Plant materials shall be native plants, nursery grown in the Puget Sound area of Washington. Dug plants may only be used upon approval of King County DDES Environmental Scientist. B. Handling. Plants shall be handled so as to avoid all damage, including breaking, bruising, root damage, sunburn, drying, freezing or other injury. Plants must be covered during transport. Plants shall not be bound with wire or rope in a manner that could damage branches. Protect plant roots with shade and wet soil in the time period between delivery and installation. Do not lift container stock by trunks, stems, or tops. Do not remove from containers until ready to plant. Water all plants as necessary to keep moisture levels appropriate to the species horticultural requirements. Plants shall not be allowed to dry out. All plants shall be watered thoroughly immediately upon installation. Soak all containerized plants thoroughly prior to installation. Bare root plants are subject to the following special requirements, and shall not be used unless planted between November I and March 1, and only with the permission of the Landscape Designer and King County DDES Environmental Scientist. Bare root plants must have enough fibrous root to insure plant survival. Roots must be covered at all times with mud and/or wet straw, moss, or other suitable packing material until Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions Sandhu Restoration, DDES file L02CG405 -6 - time of installation. Plants whose roots have dried out from exposure will not be accepted at installation inspection. C. Storage. Plants stored by the Permittee for longer than one month prior to planting shall be planted in nursery rows, and treated in a manner suitable to that species horticultural requirements. Plants must be reinspected by the Project Biologist and/ or Landscape Designer prior to installation. D. Damaged plants. Damaged dried out, or otherwise mishandled plants will be rejected at installation inspection. All rejected plants shall be immediately removed from the site. E. Plant Names. Plant names shall comply with those generally accepted in the native plant nursery trade. Any question regarding plant species or variety shall be referred to the Landscape Designer, Project Biologist or King County DDES Environmental Scientist (contact: Jon Sloan, 206/296-7158). All plant materials shall be true to species and variety and legibly tagged. F. Plant substitutions. Plant substitutions are not permitted without the permission of the Landscape Designer, Project Biologist and/or King County DDES Environmental Scientist. Same species substitutions oflarger size do not require special permission. However, small plants often experience less transplant shock and adapt more quickly to site conditions, resulting in a higher success rate. As such, smaller plants will be approved as substitutions based on certain site-specific conditions (trees not less than 1 gallon size however). G. Quality and condition. Plants shall be normal in pattern of growth, healthy, well- branched, vigorous, with well-developed root systems, and free of pests and diseases. Damaged, diseased, pest-infested, scraped, bruised, dried out, burned, broken, or defective plants will be rejected. Plants with pruning wounds over l" in diameter will be rejected. H. Roots. All plants shall be balled and bur lapped or containerized, unless explicitly authorized by the Landscape Designer and/ or Project Biologist. Rootbound plants or B&B plants with damaged, cracked or loose rootballs (major damage) will be rejected. Immediately before installation, plants' with minor root damage (some broken and/ or twisted roots) must be root-pruned. Matted or circling roots of containerized plantings must be pruned or straightened and the sides of the root ball must be roughened from top to bottom to a depth of approximately half an inch in two to four places. Bare root plantings of woody material is allowed only with permission from the Landscape Designer, Project Biologist and / or King County DDES Environmental Scientist. I. Sizes. Plant sizes shall be the size indicated in the plant schedule. Larger stock may be acceptable provided that it has not been cut back to size specified, and that the Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions Sandhu Restoration, DDES file L02CG405 -7 - root ball is proportionate to the size of the plant. Smaller stock may be acceptable, and under some circumstances preferable, based on site-specific conditions. Measurements, caliper, branching and balling and burlapping shall conform to the American Standard of Nursery Stock by the American Association of Nurserymen (latest edition). J. Form. Evergreen trees, if used, shall have single trunks and symmetrical, well- developed form. Deciduous trees shall be single trunked unless specified as multi- stem in the plan schedule. Shrubs shall have multiple stems, and be well-branched. K. Planting. Planting shall be done in accordance with illustrated details in the mitigation/ restoration plan set and accepted industry standards. L. Timing of Planting. Unless otherwise approved by King County ODES Environmental Scientist, all planting shall occur between September 15 and January 15. Overall, the earlier plants go into the ground in the fall, the more time they have to adapt to the site and extend their root systems before the water demands of spring and summer. M. Weeding. Existing and exotic vegetation in the mitigation and buffer areas will be hand weeded from around all newly installed plants at the time of installation and on routine basis through monitoring period. No chemical control of vegetation on any portion of the site is allowed without the written permission of King County DDES Environmental Scientist. N. Soil Amendments. Unless otherwise specified and approved by King County DDES, organic matter (Cedar Grove Pure Compost or approved equal) will be incorporated into the entire planting site, not including areas inside the drip line of existing trees and shrubs. One unit of loose, well-composted organic material should be incorporated with two units of loose soil to a depth of eight to ten inches ( only three to four inches within three feet of existing drip lines) and mixed thoroughly. 0. Mulch. All landscaped areas denuded of vegetation and soil surface surrounding all planting pit areas shall receive no less than 2" -4" of organic compost or certified weed free straw after planting. Compost or certified weed-free straw shall be kept well away ( at least 2") from the trunks and stems of woody plants. Compost shall be Cedar Grove Pure Compost or approved equal. No bark products or sawdust will be permitted. P. Site conditions. Contractor shall immediately notify the Landscape Designer and/ or Project Biologist of drainage or soil conditions likely to be detrimental to the growth or survival of plants. Planting operations shall not be conducted under the following conditions: freezing weather, when the ground is frozen, excessively wet weather, excessively windy weather, or in excessive heat. Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions Sandhu Restoration, ODES file L02CG405 -8 - Q. Plant locations. Locations shall be as depicted in the approved plan set. The Landscape Designer and/ or Project Biologist may change the locations of plantings shown on plans based on field conditions. R. Planting in pits. Planting pits shall be circular or square with vertical sides, and shall be 6" deeper and 12" larger in diameter than the·root ball of the plant. Break up the sides of the pit in compacted soils. Set plants upright in pits, as illustrated in planting detail. Burlap shall be removed from the planting pit. Backfill shall be worked back into holes such that air pockets are removed without adversely compacting down soils. S. Fertilizer. Slow release fertilizer may be used if pre-approved by King County DDES Environmental Scientist. Fertilizers shall be applied only at the base of plantings underneath the required covering of mulch (that does not make contact with stems of the plants). No soil amendment or fertilizers will be placed in planting holes. T. Water. Plants shall be watered midway through backfilling, and again upon completion of backfilling. For spring plantings (if approved), a rim of earth shall be mounded around the base of the tree or shrub no closer than the drip line, or no less than 30" in diameter, except on steep slopes or in hollows, as illustrated in planting detail. Plants shall be watered a second time within 24-48 hours after installation. The earthen rim / dam should be leveled prior to the second growing season. U. Staking. Most shrubs and many trees DO NOT require any staking. If the plant can stand alone without staking in a moderate wind, do not use a stake. If the plant needs support, then strapping or webbing should be used as low as possible on the trunk to loosely brace the tree with two stakes (see Planting Detail). Do not brace the tree tightly or too high on the trunk. If the tree is unable to sway, it will further lose the ability to support itself. Do not use wire in a rubber hose for strapping as it exerts too much pressure on the bark. As soon as supporting the plant becomes unnecessary, remove the stakes. All stakes must be removed within two (2) years of installation. V. Intermediate Inspections. All plants shall be inspected and approved by the Landscape Designer and/ or Project Biologist prior to installation. Condition of roots of a random sample of plants will be inspected, as well as all aboveground growth on all plants. Roots of any bare root plants, if permitted for use, will be inspected. Plant material may be approved at the source, at the discretion of the Landscape Designer and/ or Project Biologist, but all material must be re-inspected and approved on the site prior to installation. Plant locations shall also be inspected and approved prior to planting. W. Wildlife Control. As determined by the Landscape Designer, and/ or the Project Biologist, fencing may be needed to limit deer intrusion while installed plants are becoming established. Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions Sandhu Restoration, DDES file L02CG405 -9 - 8. Seeding. Seeding shall be required only as described in approved plans. A. Timing. Contractor shall insure that areas to receive seed are clean of debris and that final grades are correct. Seeding shall be performed after other plant installation is complete. Seeding is the final step of the initial installation; site shall be closed to all vehicles and foot traffic shall be minimized after seeding is complete. Seeding shall not take place when the ground is frozen or in windy weather. Seeds shall be hand broadcast or by mechanical hand powered spreader, with as even distribution as feasible. Areas within 6"-12" of stems of installed plants shall not be seeded. B. Seed mix. Use specified native mix at rate specified. All seed materials shall be free of weed seeds or other foreign matter detrimental to plant growth. NOTE: Seed mix should be ordered as early as possible to insure an adequate supply of specified native seed. C. Post seeding erosion control. Temporary erosion and sediment control facilities shall be provided in accordance with approved plans AND Appendix D of the King County Surface Water Design Manual (1997) .. 9. Maintenance. Maintenance shall be required in accordance with King County Sensitive Areas Mitigation Guidelines (2002) and approved plans. A. Survival. The Permittee shall be responsible for the health of I 00% of all newly installed plants for one growing season after installation has been accepted by King County ODES Environmental Scientist (see Performance Standards). A growing season for these purposes is defined as occurring from spring to spring (March 15 to March 15, following year). For fall installation (often required), the growing season will begin the following spring. The Permittee shall replace any plants that are failing, weak, defective in manner of growth, or dead during this growing season, as directed by the Landscape Designer, Project Biologist, and/ or King County DOES Environmental Scientist. B. Installation Timing for Replacement Plants. Replacement plants shall be installed between September 15 and January 15, unless otherwise determined by the Landscape Designer, Project Biologist, and/or King County DDES Environmental Scientist. C. Duration and Extent. In order to achieve performance standards, the Permittee shall have the mitigation area maintained for the duration of the monitoring period, TIIREE (3) years. Maintenance will include watering, weeding around base of installed plants, pruning, replacement, restaking, removal of all classes of noxious weeds (see Washington State Noxious Weeds List, WAC 16-750-005) as well as Himalayan blackberry, and any other measures needed to insure plant survival. All maintenance shall be directed by the Landscape Designer and/ or Project Biologist. Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions Sandhu Restoration, DDES file L02CG405 -10 - D. Standards for Replacement Plants. Replacement plants shall meet the same standards for size and type as those specified for original installation unless otherwise directed by the Landscape Designer, Project Biologist, and /or King County DDES Environmental Scientist. Replacement plants shall be inspected as described above for the original installation. E. Replanting. Plants that have settled in their planting pits too deep, too shallow, loose, or crooked shall be replanted as directed by the Landscape Designer, Project Biologist, and / or King County DDES Environmental Scientist. F. Herbicides/ Pesticides. Chemical controls shall not be used in the mitigation I restoration area, sensitive areas or their buffers. G. Irrigation/ Watering. Water shall be provided during the dry season (July 1 - October 15) for the first two years after installation to ensure plant survival and establishment. Water should be provided by a temporary above ground irrigation system and/ or a water truck. Water should be applied at a rate of l" of water two times a week for year 1 and 1" of water one time a week during year 2. H. General. The Permittee shall include in general maintenance activities the replacement of any vandalized or damaged signs, habitat features, fences or other structural component of the mitigation site. 10. Performance Standards -Plant Cover and Survival. Plant survival and cover standards are established to measure mitigation success within planted areas as follows: Performance Standards Year One Year Two Year Three Year Five Shrub and Saplinq Tree Cover* >15% >30% >40% Shrub and Saolino Tree Survival 100% >85% >80% Herbaceous Cover* >60% >80% >90% Herbaceous Survival 100% >85% *Includes beneficial native plants in that category that are naturally recruiting 11. Monitoring. Monitoring shall be conducted annually for THREE (3) years. A. Vegetation Monitoring. Sampling points or transects will be established for vegetation monitoring, and photo-points established from which photos will be taken throughout the monitoring period. Linear transects are the preferred method for vegetation monitoring for this site. No less than one (1) 25-meter transect will be established in the restoration area. Permanent transect location(s) must be identified on restoration site plans in the first monitoring report (they may be drawn on approved restoration plans by hand). Each transect shall detail herb, shrub, and tree aerial cover at radii of lm, Sm, and 10m respectively, using the Braun-Blanquet releve method or other acceptable field method. Monitoring of vegetation transects shall occur Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions Sandhu Restoration, DDES file L02CG405 -11 - >50% >75% >90% annually between May 15 and September 30 (prior to leaf drop), unless otherwise specified. B. Photopoints. No less than one (1) permanent photopoints will be established within the mitigation/ restoration area. Photographs will be taken from these points to visually record the condition of the mitigation/ restoration area. Photos shall be taken armually between May 15 and September 30 (prior to leaf drop), unless otherwise specified. C. Reports. Monitoring reports shall be submitted by December 31 of each year during the monitoring period. As applicable, monitoring reports must include description / data for: site plan and location map; historic description of project, including date of installation, current year of monitoring, restatement of mitigation/ restoration goals, and performance standards; plant survival, vigor, and aerial coverage from every plant community (transect data), and explanation of monitoring methodology in the context of assessing performance standards; slope condition, site stability, any structures or special features; buffer conditions, e.g. surrounding land use, use by humans, wild and domestic creatures; observed wildlife, including amphibians, avians, and others; assessment of nuisance/ exotic biota and recommendations for management; receipts for off-site disposal of any dumping, weeds, or invasive plants; receipts for any structural repair or replacement; 4" x 6" color photographs taken from permanent photo-points as shown on Monitoring Plan; and, summary of maintenance and contingency measures proposed for next season and completed for past season. D. Deficiencies. Any deficiency discovered during any monitoring OR inspection visit must be corrected within 60 days. E. Contingency Plan. Should any monitoring report reveal the mitigation has failed in whole or in part, and should that failure be beyond the scope of routine maintenance, a Contingency Plan wilJ be submitted. The Contingency Plan may range in complexity from a list of plants substituted, to cross- sections of proposed engineered structures. Once approved, it may be instalJed, and will replace the approved mitigation plan. If the failure is substantial, King County DOES may extend the monitoring period for that mitigation. 12. Bond. Prior to beginning any work, the Permittee must provide a restoration bond or assigrunent of funds per King County procedures. A bond quantity worksheet has been completed based on all elements of the Mitigation/ Restoration Plan. The total cost, plus contingency fees has been determined to be $14,077.83, which will be the amount of the restoration bond the Permittee is required to provide. Note that the approved bond will include required start date for mitigation construction. Bonds are eligible for reduction to maintenance status as soon as successful installation inspection has occurred and compliance with permit conditions and King County Sensitive Area Mitigation Guidelines (October 2000) is verified by King County DDES. Grading/Clearing Plan Review Approval Conditions Sandhu Restoration, DOES file L02CG405 -12 - I AI ~ f ~t, ./ ~ 'f u.J't:.,l \ ~A-I~ . y. IJ.' ~t::: .g A-K..l<' - '-iw1v-!.~"'(Z.j2.1 I 't:Of'1-'£-• ~,:;,".:>~ ~l -rµ,,..16. ~AJNO ()~.,.,,r~ r\1>.,+ ltA.ve: ?..~tt-t <;.L.l e, ..., fo'i -r w,~ e, . SI t..,( f-t7µ w<l,(J. eov t.l o / -~r::> ,v ttAe.. IL to1.1~ 'o'( ~\ii. Stt-i~ ~ O ~ 1 < out. fJ11 iJJP-t ~ , 1 f ".,, ~<-¢ ~ie- cv1-t~A. i)fl.,.f,f. /f£.h.3t... wt/.( IOUJ.J~D; ..l ,) I' r • / ·1 I'.»"() ( t, ~ I "f _.. ~ f,R.. ~ f I . (Jf..!, /bq I> N, p '1 (L 111ne "'f C "~ 'ili . r "Spot-e -k I( SA . e,~~ ~ ~~ -r--~'T& . ~ ~~o ,.ff. 1 l-,\~w\ i?WM~ t.,.~~. SA<t> l4~'t> 11.l.S-\AU '..'..c'i~s "?,~, 0/ ~ fa t?/2 f"IJt-t-&1\IP ~~'3~' t,(2.-, ~~ 'f,_s.,,... . ~ tt,o "'-~? "'fbflit... ~1.l-f.f. Bo'-1 M°7, SOC· DOES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 September 8, 2006 Page 1 of 1 Ao. ? ;,' ,' ( <"/. ,-" 7 :;) V I .I / . ..; (._, KJ 'o 96,o& t'I'- Hourlv Char!!es Detail Applicant: SANDHU, KULWANT 13989 SE 159TH PL RENTON WA 98058 425-269-7270 Function FG -Financial Guarantees Management Task/Description Name Financial Guarantees Receipt Graves, Stacy Subtotal FG Function SM -Sensitive Area Monitoring Task/Description Name Permit I Plan Review Brandt, Lisa Permit/ Plan Review Brandt, Lisa Permit/ Plan Review Brandt, Lisa Permit/ Plan Review Brandt, Lisa Permit/ Plan Review Brandt, Lisa Permit/ Plan Review Brandt, Lisa Permit / Plan Review Brandt, Lisa Permit I Plan Review Brandt, Lisa Permit I Plan Review Brandt, Lisa Permit I Plan Review Brandt, Lisa Permit I Plan Review Brandt, Lisa Permit/ Plan Review Brandt, Lisa Subtotal SM TOTAL: Org 3415 Org 3470 3470 3470 3470 3470 3470 3470 3470 3470 3470 3470 3470 Activity Number: Project Number: Development Number: Permit Type: Status: Workday 08/08/2003 Workday 07/08/2003 07/10/2003 12/18/2003 12/23/2003 06/15/2005 06/24/2005 06/24/2005 01/03/2006 06/05/2006 06/13/2006 07/07/2006 07/12/2006 L03Gil66 L02CG408 G-INSPCT MONITOR Hours Amount 0.5 $69.00 0.5 $69.00 Hours Amount 0.25 $34.50 0.25 $34.50 0.25 $34.50 0.5 $69.00 0.5 $72.45 0.25 $36.23 0.5 $72.45 0.25 $36.23 1.0 $144.90 0.25 $36.23 0.75 $108.68 0.25 $36.23 5.0 $715.90 5.5 $784.90 The hours shown above represent the actual hours of service charged on this permit to date. Hours worked that are covered by payment of a base fee, are shown with an amount of zero. Hourly charges not covered by a base fee are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be naid in full before DDES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Applicant: SANDHU, KULWANT Location: 12044 SE 184th St Site Address: Permit Type: G-INSPCT, Sub-Type: INSPSENS Title: SANDHU -REMOVAL OF FILL & REST Description: Billing for sensitive area review only for A03BN352 Permit Number: L03Gl166 Date Printed: 09-08-2006 Status: MONITOR Applied: 07/10/2003 Decision: 06/21/2005 The following holds, notices, and comments have been entered. HINTZT 07/10/2003 Routed to LBRA HINTZT 07/10/2003 Sent billing notification letter BRANDTL 07/1012003 rec'd new file for mon. A03BN352 BRANDTL 12/18/2003 inquire email exch per grading in wetld occuring on property at this time. Req. that NGil look into. BRANDTL 06/21/2005 Rev grading notes and found that in 10/04 Ramon had conducted three installation inspections related to the planting not his grading. I will change this into monitoring status and rv with Ramon. BRANDTL 06/24/2005 Mr. Sandhu called in and said they are just now working on phase two, he indicated that once that is done they will install the fence. We discussed bond reduction, transfer to new owner he decided it would be best to keep it at performance as the fence won't be installed until the end fall '06 and at that time all houses will be finished and plantings would be at end of year 3. He said they have been in the ground for 2 years as of this year, and only 2 died per his review, no invasives and they are watering plants regularly. On track. He will submit photos of the plantings for me in Sept. of this year for monitoring report. BRANDTL 01/04/2006 Rev file see little loss from cement above but no photos rec'd call back from Sandhu and he will send photos BRANDTL 06/05/2006 Rec;d photos from Sandhu just now for monitoring for last year, he was requesting release as bond expires he says in Sept. 2006. I will call or write about scott's broom in photos and need for fence on approved plan dated July 1,2003 BRANDTL 06/05/2006 rec'd photos rev'd and approved but did see scott's broom and sent follow up letter requiring removal and install of fence and signs not seen prior to final inspection. -to Mr. Sandhu -attached letter in links BRANDTL 06/13/2006 rec'd letter sent back, had to re-address and remail. BRANDTL 07/07/2006 Kulwant -returned his call per letter and sold property. He didn't quite understand that even though he sold property he is responsible under bond for fence and sign installation. He thought as he sold it as-is with Jon Sloan and Ramon saying fence could be installed "later" with developement closer to completion that he would have to install it. He didn't transfer bonds (2) or grading permit to new owner "Davis REal Estate Group" under L06SR020---emailed Pete Dye due to confusion of double dipping with new owner ... but I know that is not likely the case. Kulwant will work witt new owner to get fence installed so his bond and grading permit can be finalled. BRANDTL 07/1212006 Rev with Nick who will be reviewing plat conditions once engineering submital comes in from David new owner. Nick will ensure review matches existing mitigation plan. Until bond and grading permit are transfered/ reposted by new owner Davis, Sandhu is still responsible for fence, monitoring and maintenance. Could be that ma int. is falling off as Sandhu thought he was done. -Full bond will remain to be held until fencing and owner transfer is done. BRANDTL 09/08/2006 Review with Kulwant Sandhu , I keep confusing him with Harijit Sandhu so I know billing is messed up, some. Reviewed the fact that new owners are going to put in fence and they have a permit which conditions fence install. ... need to verify this prior to release of this bond. Kulwant out of town 2 weeks and will try to schedule final insepction with him on return. lu_comm 5/16/05 L\~4_/ \ie,\1 5· q ·ck N,;;;rei1 ---~e...~CW-E'... Jhz._ __ _ -_\L__~.-1:_es._~ _ SE _ rs~~~ J _ _ _{)_ e:..t.A.. ~ -~ a..~» r:S -~ ~~1-' ~ 1--2.a'b-6 _!_ -, ~l..!_~S:,.{;77 2.7~ ~4V)~ (' --~ ---~ ----- PHONE CONVERSATION RECORD Conversation with: Name $ l} "1.121\ ~ fro r . Company _______ _ Date ----- Time _____ .AWPM Address ________ _ Call Received Call Placed Subject . .,_: -----'Af--'+' +'f-'-f-'='c)-'./'--"'v'--'D"'----'''-'-P_·_f .;._Z-_·=--o--'-'/ __ 6_,f'--t_la_G___:_. __ _ J'llotes :.~------------~---------- \'1 ~ SA-tJ.OH-ll 9a:,I p p::~ t? - ~..i~v' v'~ \ --A-:t<""" 1-.L~ v~ ® KingCouuty Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oaksdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 July 10, 2003 Kulwant Sandhu 13989 Southeast 159"' Place Renton, WA 98058 RE: Subject: Dear Mr. Sandhu: Financial Guarantee Activity Number A03BN344 (L03Gll 66) Sensitive Area Mitigation Thank you for your recent posting of the Sensitive Area Mitigation financial guarantee associated with L02CG408. The purpose of this letter is to provide a county monitoring staff contact and to inform you of the King County hourly fees associated with the monitoring activity. Permit conditions required that the mitigation area satisfy approved plan performance goals and standards of success by the end of the monitoring period. Monitoring and maintenance will need to be performed on this site throughout the monitoring period to comply with permit conditions. Typically you can expect an installation inspection, follow-up reviews of the monitoring report and site visits if questions arise and a final inspection at the end of the monitoring period. Attached is a copy of the bond monitoring guidelines to further explain the process. Typically, such maintenance includes watering and control of invasive, non-native, bmsh and weeds. All documents and future monitoring reports should be submitted under the bond number (above) to enable us to monitor the progress of your project and ensure approval of the release of your financial guarantee at or before the end of the performance monitoring period. An activity has been established to track the monitoring activities. Monitoring and maintenance verification inspections will be conducted on an as needed/annual basis by the Department of Development and Environmental Section (DDES) staff to ensure your project is progressing toward satisfying the success criteria. Fees will be charges at the annual current billing rate (2003+ rate is $138.00 per hour) for staff time associated with all work done in conjunction with monitoring, inspection, permit compliance, and release of financial guarantees. Please reference your activity number and provide a copy of this correspondence when remitting payment to our fmance office located in the main reception area on the first floor at DDES. These fees must be paid before the release of the financial guarantee. Kulwant Sandhu July 10, 2003 Pagel If you have any questions regarding this process please contact me within (30) thirty days at 206-296-6764 or lisa.brandt@metrokc.gov. ~~ Lisa Brandt Environmental Scientist II Critical Areas Section Attachment cc: File BOND REQUIREMENT NOTIFICATION Date :C I~ I ,' 21.Jo 3 TO: Financial Guarantees Management Unit FM: Critical Areas Section RE: Activity!Project # ../ Cl q f §j 6B Wt... Cb, t/-ob The application referenced above has been approved. The bonds listed below are required for this project. Applicant ___:_k,,,_...:.l.,_......, __ ,r--'------S,-=--,,_,.__.(.:_:__:c__lv..,.._=-=--=---Phone# ( f2r) 2 G,'7· ":/-7. 1-0 /'31' $ '1 ~€ 1~7-rl. ~ Bond Type ~!reams/Geology/Wildlife) Bond Amount Performance $,____:____/ ....L.....il-Jl---7_7_7._8_3_ Maintenance D # Years Monitoring _:3::_ _____ _ Initial Bond Fee _________ _ FGMUBondActivity# fjo 3/3N3 ii/ Please return this notification with the appropriate copies of the bond forms and initial bond fee amount that was sent the applicant, to Critical Areas Section. cc: File King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW, Renton, WA 98055-1219 Date:_6/26/03. _____ _ \ Bond Quantity Worksheet for Sensitive Area Mitigations Project Name:_Sandhu. ______________________ _ Project Number:_K.C. No. L02CG408 8-twelve #A2-125. ______________________ _ Location:_12044 SE 184th St, Parcel #6199600320 ________________________ _ Contact Name: _B-twelve Associates, Darcey Miller _______________________ _ Address: _1103 West Meeker Street, Kent, WA. __________________________ _ TREES (INCLUDES DELIVERY, INSTALLATION,_ & MATERIALS ;Scientific Name !Common Name I Qty I Untt Price I 1 gaJ Qty IUntt Price 2gal QtylUntt Price 5 J!.31 1 gallon l Total 2iallon Total Abies grandis .. grand fir Acer macrophyl/um big leaf maple $13.54 A/nus rubra red alder $13.22 Arbutus menzresii Pacific madrone $14.50 Betula papyrifera paper birch $13.22 Fraxinus latifo/ia Oregon ash $1322 ~ Pies.a sitehensis"' Sitka spruce $13.54 $24.15 Pinus contorta'" Shore pine $13.54 $24.15 Pinus monticola* Western white pine $13.54 $24.15 Popu/us tremuloides quaking aspen ~ Populus trlchocarpa black cottonwood $13.54 $23.51 Prunus emarginata bitter cherry $13.54 Psuedotsuga msnziesii'"' Douglas fir $13.54 $23.51 Taxus brevifolia"' Pacific yew Thuia plk;ata • western red cedar $13.54 $23.51 Tsuga heteroph11a• western hemlock ___113.54 $23.82 Total Total All plant prices are from Fourth Comer Nurseries, Sound Native Plants, Stonn Lake Growers, and Wabash Natives (containers); and Abundant Life and Frosty Hollow (seeds). 5 _2allon Total $44.74 $44.74 $44.74 Total: Qty !Total Cost Contact: B-twelve Associates, 110:J W. Meeker St., Kent, WA 98032 (25.3) 859-0515 Document revised Aug. 8, 1998 DATE Pace 1 of 4 VED IL 2..00'3 SHRUBS (INCLUDES DELIVERY, INSTALLATION, & MATERIALS) Scientific Name Common Name Qty Unit Price Qty Qty Unit Price 1 gallon 2 gallon 5 gallon Aoor Circinatum vine maple $13.54 $23.51 Amslanchier alnitolia servicebeny $13.54 $23.82 Berberis aquifo/ium tall Oregon grape $24.15 Berberis nervosa short Oregon grape $13.86 Comus stolonifera red-osier dogwood $13.22 $23.51 Cory/us comuta hazelnut $13.54 $23.51 Crataegus lasil black hawthorn $13.22 $23.51 Gaultherla shallon salal $13.86 Holodiscus discolor ocean spray 19 $13.54 $23.51 Lonicera invoJucrata black twinbeny $13.54 $22.87 Myrica gale sweetgale Oplopanax horridus Devil's club $24.15 Philadaphus lewisii mock orange $22.87 Physocarpus capitatus Pacific nlnebark 18 $23.51 Prunus virginiana choke cherry Pyrus fusca western crabapple $13.22 $23.51 Rhamnus purshiana cascara $13.22 $23.51 Rhododendron macrophullum Pacific rhododendron $14.19" Ribes bracteosum stink currant $13.22 Ribas /acustre prickly currant $13.86 Ribes sanguinsum red-flowering currant $13.86 Rosa nutkana Nootka rose 12 $13.54 $23.51 Rosa pisocarpa. clustered rose $13.54 $22.87 Rubus leucodsrmis black raspbeny Rubus parvlflorus thimblebeny 18 $13.54 Rubus spectabilis salmonberry $13.22 $23.51 Salix (l8yeriana Geyer willow $13.22 $22.87 5allX hookerlana Hooker's willow $12.91 $22.87 SaJlx Jasiantira Pacific willow $13.22 $22.87 Salix scouleriana Scouler willow $22.87 Salix sitchensis Sitka willow $13.22 $22.87 Sambucus racemosa red elderberry $13.54 $23.51 Sotbus sitchensis cascade mountain ash Symphoricarpos a/bus snowberry $13.22 $23.51 Vaccinium ovatum evergreen huckleberry $13.86 Vaccinium parvifo/ium red hucklebany $15.47 Total: Total: Total: Conlact.· 8-twe/ve AssocialasJ103 W. MeekerSt., Ken~ WA 98032 (253) 859-0515 Paae 2 of 4 INSTALLATION COSTS (LABOR, EQUIPMENT, OVERHEAD & PROFIT) Scientific Name Amount Compost, vegetable, delivered and ~.e_read Daccmpacting tilVhardpan, medium, to 6' deptt, Decompacting till/hardpan, medium, to 12ft de_e_th Fertilize, slow release tablets, 30gm/tree Hydroseeding PLANTS: Slips (willow, red-osier) PLANTS: Stakes (willow) 1TopsoH -delivered & Spread subtotal GRASSES/EMERGENTS(INCLUDES DELIVERY, INSTALLATION, & MATERIAL.$} Wetland Seed Mix 31b/1000 sq.ft 1000 Buffer Seed Mix 31b/1000 sq.ft 1000 Emergent Sedge, rush & grass Subtotal HABITAT STRUCTURES (INCLUDES DELIVERY, INSTALLATION, & MATERIALS Specific Name Fascines (willow) Woody debris, large Snags ubtot, Contact: 8-twetw, Associates, 1103 W. Meeker St., Kent, WA 98032 (253) 859-0515 Pace 3 of 4 GENERAL ITEMS (INCLUDES DELIVERY, INSTALLATION, & MATERIALS} Specific Name Fencing, chain link, 6' high "Fencing, splH rail, S' high (2-rall) Signs, Sensitive Area Bound, 8 Fish Stream Sign Irrigation, Tempora1 btotal OTHER COSTS-THROUGHOlJT MONITORING PERIOD Item lnspectio'!! annual Inspection, final Maintenance!. semi-annual Maintenance!. annual Monitorin~ annual Subtol!!! Total Construction Amount $11,822.26 Total Bond Amount I Agency Multie_lier $14,777.83 Agenc' Note: All Grading expenses and fencing (permanent and erosion) are included in the grading bond for the entire project site. Contact 8-twelve Associates, 1103 w. Meeker St., Kent, WA 98032 (253/ 859-0515 Paae 4 of 4 f June 26, 2003 Mr. Ramon Locsin King County D.D.E.S. 900 Oakesdale Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 Re: Mitigation Plan Sandhu Property; No. L02CG408; Job #A2-125 Dear Ramon, 8-twelve Associates, Inc. 1103 W. Meeker St. Kent, WA 98032·5751 (v) 253·859-0515 (f) 253-852-4 732 (e) in1o@b12assoc.com 1-oze&11ce RECEIVED SITE DEVELOPMENT JUN 2 7 2003 KING CO. D.D.E.S. REVISION This letter responds to the County's letter to Mr. Sandhu, dated January 13, 2003. A site meeting was also held on March 19, 2003, to further discuss the impacts and mitigation associated with the grading violation on the site. Attached please find the following: I. B-twelve's Wetland & Buffer Mitigation Plan (Sheet W-1) 2. B-twelve's Wetland & Buffer Mitigation Plan Notes. After the Plan is approved by the County, these Notes will be placed on a plan sheet (24 x 36") and labeled Sheet W-2. 3. Sensitive Areas Bond Quantity Worksheet for planting, inspection, and monitoring costs. 4. Cover letter, Civil Engineering Plans and Specifications, and bond quantity worksheet, by Stiefel Engineering. The areas which appear to have been graded are shown on Sheet W-1, and in greater detail on the Engineering Plans (Sheet C.2). According to Stiefel Engineering, approximately 15,453 sf of buffer area was disturbed, including the dirt piles to the east and west of the channel in Wetland A/B/C. As agreed in the site meeting and in the subsequent emails, the following actions will be considered mitigation for the grading violation within sensitive areas. • Temporary erosion and sediment control measures will be put in place prior to the start of any grading work. • The dirt piles, including those located on each side of the wetland channel, will be regraded, and the areas restored to what was approximately pre- existing grade. • All graded or disturbed areas in the buffers and restored wetlands will be seeded with a native grass seed mix. BY·:rl'~~~~~~::,..,,,.,.,,,.,.,... .C SENS AREA REVIEW DATE I '2-Ct'J3 { Re: Mitigation Plan Sandhu/No. L02CG408/Job #A2-125 B-twel ve Associates June 26, 2003 Page 2 of 2 • Native shrubs and grasses will be planted on both sides of the wetland channel. • All debris will be removed from wetland buffers, specifically in the buffer that is south of wetland flags Al-AS. • A wildlife-passable, split-rail fence with sensitive areas signs will be installed along the wetland buffers, According to the engineer, the area outside of sensitive areas that was disturbed by grading activity is approximately 27,425 sf. (See Civil Engineering Plans.) The limits of general cleanup, regrading, and erosion control work are shown on the Engineering plans. We believe that these mitigation measures will restore the site to its preexisting condition, and will make up for the temporary impacts that the disturbance may have had on the sensitive areas. The planted areas will help to filter runoff and provide wildlife habitat, and will also stabilize the area near the wetland channel, thus decreasing erosion. Please feel free to call or email me (darcey@bl2assoc.com) if you have any questions or need any additional information. Sincerely, ·~·B~ Darcey B. Miller Wetland Ecologist CC: Kulwant Sandhu Mark Stiefel, P.E. File: dml A2125-Sandhu/ AZ 125-KC-6-03.doc 8-twelve Associates, Inc. 1103 W. Meeker St. Kent, WA 98032·5751 SANDHU PROPERTY WETLAND & BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN NOTES (to be Sheet W-2) MITIGATION PLAN CONCEPT (v) 253-859-0515 (f) 253-852-4732 (e) info@b12assoc.com The property owner proposes to restore the disturbed sensitive areas to the conditions which existed just before the violation activity. The proposed mitigation plan includes the following activities: • Temporary erosion and sediment control measures will be put in place before any grading work is begun. • The dirt piles, including those located on each side of the wetland channel, will be regraded, and the areas restored to what was approximately pre- existing grade. • All graded or disturbed areas in the buffers and restored wetlands will be seeded with a native grass seed mix. • Native shrubs and grasses will be planted on both sides of the wetland channel. • All debris will be removed from wetland buffers, specifically in the buffer that is south of wetland flags Al-A8. • A wildlife-passable, split-rail fence with sensitive areas signs will be installed along the wetland buffers. MITIGATION GOALS The goals of the mitigation are: • To restore disturbed areas of the buffer by regrading, planting native vegetation, and removing debris. • To protect the sensitive areas in the future, by filing a Notice on Title and constructing a fence with signage. • To meet the Standards of Success, outlined in the Monitoring Program below. MAINTENANCE PROGRAM Work to be completed on an annual basis includes: ' Re: Wetland & Buffer Mitigation Plan Sandhu Property/No. L02CG408/ Job #A2-125 B-twel ve Associates June 26, 2003 Page 2 of3 I. Himalayan blackberry, Japanese knotweed, evergreen blackberry, reed canary grass, Scots broom, English ivy, morning glory, or other invasive species should be controlled by hand within the sensitive areas. 2. Replace dead or failed plant material after the annual monitoring report has specified which plants have not survived. Replacement species are to be of the same species, size and location as original plantings. Plantings are to be installed during the dormant period (late October through mid-March). 3. Remove tree staking and guy wires from all trees after one year. The Owner will conduct all items listed in the Maintenance Work Scope on an annual basis. Additional work may be required per the Monitoring Report and as approved by the County. Additional work may include removal of the grasses around each shrub and tree, installation of wood chips at each shrub and tree base, reseeding of the mitigation area, re-staking of existing trees, and erosion control protection. WETLAND & BUFFER MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN The enhanced buffer will be monitored once per year, over a three-year period. Monitoring will be conducted using the techniques and procedures described below to quantify the survival and the relative health and growth of plant material. A monitoring report submitted following each monitoring visit will describe and quantify the status of the mitigation at that time. Per King County Sensitive Areas Mitigation Guidelines, the monitoring report should be submitted to the County by October 31 of each monitoring year. The vegetation monitoring consists of inspection of the planted material to determine the health and vigor of the installation. All the planted material in the wetland and buffer will be inspected during each monitoring visit to determine the level of survival of the installation. Because only a very small area is being planted, coverage monitoring for the shrubs is not required. However, a visual estimate of herbaceous coverage within the buffers should be made each year. No more than 10% cover of non-native or other invasives, e.g, Scots broom, Himalayan blackberry, etc. is permissible in any monitoring year. The bond- holder is encouraged to maintain mitigation sites within these standards throughout out the monitoring period, to avoid corrective measures. Photo points should be identified on the site. During each monitoring visit, there should be photo documentation of the restoration project. .. Re: Wetland & Buffer Mitigation Plan Sandhu Property/No. L02CG408/ Job #A2-125 B·twel ve Associates June 26, 2003 Page3 of3 Visual observations of all wildlife species observed during the monitoring will be recorded. Standards of Success I. Evaluation of the success of the mitigation project will be based upon a 90% survival rate for all planted vegetation at the end of year 3. 2. Evaluation of the success of the mitigation project will be based upon an 80% herbaceous cover within the seeded buffer areas at the end of Year 3. 3. No more than 10% cover of non-native or other invasives, e.g, Scots broom, Himalayan blackberry, etc. is permissible in any monitoring year. CONTINGENCY PLAN A contingency plan can be implemented if necessary. Contingency plans can include additional plant installation, erosion control, and plant substitutions including type, size, and location. File: dm/A2125-Sandhu/A2125-Notes.doc King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW, Renton, WA 98055-1219 Date:_6/26/03. _____ _ ' Bond Quantity Worksheet for Sensitive Area Mitigations Project Name:_Sandhu. ______________________ _ Project Number:_K.C. No. L02CG408 B-twelve #A2-125 ______________________ _ Location:_12044 SE 184th St, Parcel #6199600320. _________________________ _ Contact Name: _B-twelve Associates, Darcey Miller _______________________ _ Address:_ 1103 West Meeker Street, Kent, WA. __________________________ _ mEES (INCLUDES DELIVERY, INSTALLATION, & MATERIALS. Scientific Name !Common Name I Qty I Unit Price I 1 gal Qty IUnlt Price 2 ll_al Qty I Unit Price 5 J!OI 1 gallon l Total 2_g_allon Total 5 _llallon Total Abies grandis • grand fir Acer macrophyJ/um big leaf maple $13.54 Alnus rubra red alder $13.22 Arbutus menziesii Pacific madrone $14.50 Betula papyrifera paper birch $13.22 Fraxinus latifolia Oregon ash $13.22 $23.51 Picea sitchensis .. Sitka spruce $13.54 $24.15 Pinus contorta • Shore pine $13.54 $24.15 Pinus monticoJa• Western white pine $13.54 $24.15 Populus tremuloides quaking aspen $24.15 Populus trichocarpa black cottonwood $13.54 $23.51 Prunus emarginata bitter cherry $13.54 Psuedotsuga menziesii* Douglas fir $13.54 $44.74 Ta,ws brevifolia* Pacificvew Thuja plicata' western red cedar $13.54 $44.74 Tsuga heterophlla* western hemlock $13.54 $44.74 Total Total: All plant prices are from Fourth Comer Nurseries, Sound Native Plants, Storm Lake Growers, and Wabash Natives (containers); and Abundant Life and Frosty Hollow (seeds). Qty !Total Cost Contact B-twelve Associates, 1103 W. Meeker St., Kent, WA 98032 (253) 859-0515 Document revised Aug. 8, 1998 VED ' -.C SENS AREA REVIEW DATE IL "'-Oa':J Page 1 of 4 SHRUBS (INCLUDES DELIVERY, INSTALLATION, & MATERIALS) Scientific Name Common Name Qty Unit Price Qty Qty Unit Price 1 gallon 2 gallon 5 gallon Acer Circinatum vine maple $13.54 $23.51 Amelanchier alnifoJia serviceberry $13.54 $23.82 Berberis aquifolium tall Oregon grape $24.15 Berberis nervosa short Oregon grape $13.86 Comus stolonifera red-osier dogwood $13.22 $23.51 Cory/us comuta hazelnut $13.54 $23.51 Crataegus douglasii black hawthorn $13.22 $23.51 Gaultheria shallon salal $13.86 Ho/odiscus discolor ocean spray 19 $13.54 $23.51 Lonicera involucrata black twinberry $13.54 $22.87 Myncaga/e sweetgale Oplopanax horridus Devil's club $13.86 $24.15 Philadephus lewisii mock orange $13.54 $22.87 Physocarpus capitatus Pacffic ninebark 18 $13.22 $23.51 Prunus virginiana choke cherry Pyros fusca western crabap~e $13.22 $23.51 Rhamnus purshiana cascara $13.22 $23.51 Rhododendron macrophullum Pacific rhododendron $14.19 Ribas bracteosum stink currant $13.22 Ribas /acustre prickly currant $13.86 Ribes sanguinsum red-flowering currant $13.86 Rosa nutkana Nootka rose 12 $13.54 $23.51 Rosa pisocarpa clustered rose $13.54 $22.87 Rubus Jeucodermis black raspberry Rubus paNiflorus thimbJeberry 18 $13.54 Rubus spectabilis salmon berry $13.22 $23.51 Salix gayeriana Geyer willow $13.22 $22.87 Salix hookeriana Hooker's willow $12.91 $22.87 Salix lasiandra Pacfficwillow $13.22 $22.87 Salix scou/eriana Scouler willow $22.87 Salix sitchensis Sitka willow $13.22 $22.87 Sambucus racemosa red elderberry $13.54 $23.51 Sorbus sitchensis Cascade mountain ash Symphorica.rpos albus snowberry $13.22 $23.51 Vaccinium ovatum evergreen huckleberry $13.86 Vacclnium parvifollum reel huckleberry $15.47 Total: Contact 8-twelve Associates, 1103 W. Meeker St, Ken~ WA 98032 (253) 859-0515 PaQe 2 of 4 INSTALLATION COSTS (LABOR, EQUIPMENT, OVERHEAD & PRO Scientific Name Amount Compost, vegetable, delivered and spread Decompacting till/hardpan, medium, to 6' depth Decompacting till/hardpan, medium, to 12' depth Fertilize, slow reltiase_tablets, 30gm/tree Hydroseeding PLANTS: Slips (willow, red-osier) PLANTS: Stakes (willow) Topsoil• delivered & Spread Subtotal GRASSES/EMERGE INCLUDES DELIVERY, INSTALLATION, & MATERIALS Wettand S-Mix 31b/1000 sq.fl. 1000 Buffer Seed Mix 3lb/1000 sq.ft. 1000 Emergent Sedge, rush & grass Subtotal HABITAT STRUCTURES (INCLUDES DELIVERY, INSTALLATION, & MATERIALS SpecHlc Name Fascines (willow) Woody deblis, large Snags subtotal Contact: B-fwe/ve Associates, 1J.Q3 W. Meeker St., Kent, WA 98032 (253) 859-0515 Page 3of 4 GENERAL ITEMS (INCLUDES DEUVERY,_INSTALLATION, & MATERIALS Specific Name Fencing, chaln Hnk, 6' hill_h •Fencing, spllt rail, 3' high (2-rail) Fencing, Temporary (NGPE) Si~~. Sensitive Area Bounda F°ISh Stream Si.Q.n Irrigation, Temporary subtotal OTHER COSTS-THROUGHOUT MONITORING PERIOD Item Inspection, annual Inspection, final Maintenance, semi-annual Maintenance.! annual Monltorin.Q_ annual SUbtotal Total Construction Amount $11,822.26 Total Bond Amount I Agency Multiplier $14,777.83 Note: All Grading expenses and fencing_(pennanent and erosion) are_lncluded In the grading bond for the entire project site. Contact: B-twBivB Associates, 1103 W. Meeker St., Kent, WA 98032 (2531859-0515 PaQe4 of 4 Activity: J L02CG 408 S talus: JMC ilr,j, Dale: J12. Location: J12044 SE 184TH ST Sere en feople Status: I MONITOR Sub Type:IGRADING Proj Title: ISANDHU GRADING RESTORATION Doser: IREMOVAL OF FILL & RESTORATION OF WETLAND Location: 112044 SE 184TH ST Owner: ISANDHU KULWANT Parcel No: 1619960·0320 Disturbed Area: I 1.39 Comm Plan Area: lsc Logged Acres: ~I 0~.~00~-- Applicanl: ISANDHU, KULWANT City I Zip:IRenlon, 98058 Assigned SOS: IRLOC Conslr Type: I O TH .iJ H PA Require [YIN J: fN .jJ ... I l . ___ j ·-" % Complele:W-I 1!pdate I Applied: I 1210212002 Deemed Complete: I 1211712002 Vested: I 12102/2002 SEPA[Y/NJ: fN TD: r--I_I_I_ Approved RT I: I 0711512003 Issued: I 08/08/2003 Expires: I 08/0812004 Complete: I_I _I __ N olice on T ille[Y IN): fN Sensitive Area [YIN): fN Drainage Rev [YIN): fN FPA Required [YIN): fN ---- NPDES Required [YIN): fN WRIA No: rs-- Amount Paid: I $4,026.00 Develop: Licensee: KING COUNTY, WA Wednesday, Jan 12, 2005 01:26 PM DOE Listed Site [YIN): fN Balance Due: I $0. 00 User: lsdsjbal Computer: DE217998 Os: Windows NT Version: 5.1 Last Status Change: IOB/0812003 Entered by: IPINTLWAL Dale Entered: 112102/2002 Serial Number: 6136 Users: 150 Version: v. 4.7.77 King County Department of Development and Environmental Sen·ices 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Applicant Location Site Address :SANDHU, KULWANT :12044 SE 184TH ST Permit Type :GRADE , Sub-Type: GRADING Title. :SANDHU GRADING RESTORATION Permit No Date Printed Status Applied Decision : L02CG408 : 01-12-2005 : MONITOR : 12/02/2002 : 07/15/2003 Desiri lion :REMOVAL OF FILL & RESTORATION OF WETLAND The following holds, notices, and comments have been entered. PINTLWAL 12/02/2002 SET UP FILE AND ROUTE TO KNEW THIS DAY LSDSKNEW 12/04/2002 Permit application came in on 11/20/02, and it was not received in the grading section until 12/3/02. LSDSKNEW 12/04/2002 .. *CONTACT KNEW PRIOR TO SITE VISIT!!*** LSDSRLOC 12/17/2002 Documents routed to Jon Sloan for wetland review today. LSDSTHIN 12/19/2002 Routed to JSLO LSDSJSLO 01/10/2003 WETL -completed prelim review, requirements emailed to RLOC 1/10/03, as foll. DATE: January 9, 2003 TOI: Ramon Locsin, Site Development Specialist FM: Jon Sloan, Env. Scientist RE: L02CG408, Sandhu I have completed a site visit and reviewed the following information for the referenced proposal: -Wetland Analysis Report, B-12 Associates, August 5, 2002 -Earthwork Estimate Opinion, Mark Stiefel, P.E., November 5, 2002 -Site Plan, B-12 Associates, August 2002 -Letter of Darcey Miller (B-12 Associates) to Kathy Newborn (DOES), November 19, 2002 At this time I will require the following items to be addressed prior to completing sensitive areas review] 1. Photographs taken immediately following the unauthorized clearing and grading indicate that_fill_rnaterial was placed within the wetland (see Photo #1 ). The wetland report indicates that "it _<l!)pears that the clearing/ grading occurred within the wetland buffer only, and not in wetlands." My site visit confirms that fill material has been placed within wetlands, though it is difficultto determine the extent without examining soil borings. As such, please request that the apJJ.licant provide a supplemental wetland analysis that includes a thorough examination of manually installed soil pits throughout the area adjacent the channelized portion of Wetland A/B/C. The suEJJlemental analysis shall be required prior to acceptance of delineated wetland boundaries. 2. To restore the wetland buffer to preexisting conditions, the applicant has proposed to restore th~ original grade and reseed with native grass seed mix. This strategy does not compensate for te,:rnpo@I loss of wetland functions and construction impacts. As such, additional wetland and/ or buffer enhancement shall be required as compensatory mitigation. Once wetland boundaries have been a!irovecl, the applicant shall be required to provide a restoration plan that provides additional enhancement to offset temporal and construction related impacts. Restoration plan shall be deve}o~d in accordance with the attached King County guidelines, "Sensitive Areas Mitigation / Restoration Plans for Wetlands, Wetland Buffer, or Stream Buffer" and "Restoration & Enhancement of Iii"""' ;" ,;"' """""" (,00, ). A sp« ra;, le= (m apposed """i ,Osfelle<l a, e, buffer's edge and posted with sensitive areas signs to preclude additional disturbance may be used to satisfy the additional enhancement requirement. 3. The wetland report recommends that "[b]ecause development will likely commence within the next year, we recommend that a monitoring schedule not be required. However, if the site is not developed, a 3-year monitoring program will be completed." King County restoration guidelines requires that (at least) a three year maintenance and monitoring program, including performance bond, be included with all restoration projects. Once wetland boundaries are approved, the applicant will be required to include a three year monitoring and maintenance plan within the required restoration plan. Additionally, a completed bond quantity worksheet shall be required prior to plan approval. LSDSRLOC 03/05/2003 Letter received form applicant requesting additional time till 5/13/03 to submit requested information. Request granted. Letter in file. Request also made for on site meeting. Will set up meeting after 3/11/03 so Jon Sloan can attend. LSDSRLOC 03/18/2003 Site meeting held today at request of applicant. Present were myself, Jon Sloan, Darcy Miller, Mark Stiefel, and Kulwait Sandhu. Meeting to discuss issues and verify wetland flagging. Revised plans still to be submitted. LSDSRLOC 07/01/2003 Received on 6/27/03, 4 sets of revised grading, wetland mitigation plans, and response letter. Plans routed to Jon Sloan. LUCAJSLO 07/01/2003 WETL -reviewed revised plans rec'd 6/27/03. approved wetl routing station, sent notice on title to applicant, approved stamped plans, forwarded bond work to FGMU and set up bond file for LBRA. Conditions sent to RLOC 7/1/03. Note that sens areas approval of wetland I buffer remediation plan is given prior to final revisions to grading plan; TESC changes being requested by RLOC will not affect the wetland/ buffer remediation. Approved plans and bond qty wksht given to RLOC 7/1/03. LSDSRLOC 07/07/2003 grading bond quantity worksheet forwarded to stacy graves today. LUCATHIN 07/09/2003 Sent Bond Requirement Notification to FGMU LSDSRLOC 07/15/2003 plans approved. LSDSRSAN 07/16/2003 Ready to issue letter to applicant. Payment of fees, post bonds, forms, notice on title. LSDSJBRO 08/08/2003 Mr. Sanhu brought in all required ready to issue items. Permit issued, copy mailed to Mr. Sandhu LSDSRLOC 08/08/2003 Approved plans mailed to Mr. Sandhu today. LSDSRLOC 09/22/2003 Pre-conn held on site this morning. Due to vegetation growing, wetland flags were hard to find. Told applicant that clearing limits need to be marked and approved by me prior to begining work. He will flag them and let me know. LSDSRLOC 10/10/2003 Site inspection today. Stakes placed for clearing limits/placement of silt fence. Clearing limits okay. Mr. Sandhu notified by phone. He will call me when they begin restoration. LSDSRLOC 11/03/2003 Stopped by site on friday 10/31/03. Work has not been done yet. Will call applicant to inquire as to when work will be done. LSDSRLOC 12/03/2003 Site inspection today. Silt fencing placed, re-grading of buffer area started. Small area outside identified restoration area cleared also. Culvert removed from channel. Will need this area stabilized. Placed phone call to applicant. LSDSRLOC 02/17/2004 Site visit done 2/11/04. Grading done. still need plantings to be done. will call applicant for small area needing erosion control. LSDSRLOC 06/01/2004 Site inspection done today per phone call from applicant that plantings have been done. Amount of shrubs placed are about half of what the number called for on the approved plans. Also, split rail fence has not been placed yet. Left phone message to applicant to call me back. LSDSRLOC 07/08/2004 Site inspection today at request of applicant. Per applicant, all plantings done. Invasive weeds creeping up in mitigation area. Not all plants in. Will talk with applicant. Left message to call me back. LSDSRLOC 07/14/2004 Site meeting today with Mr. Sandhu. Additional plantings were planted outside of the approved location. He will move them into location and remove the invasive weeds. He will let me know when he is done. LSDSRLOC 10/15/2004 Planting inspection on 10/12/04. Plants installed properly per plan. Changing status to monitor. Still need fencing to be done per approved plan. B-twelve Associates, Inc. -. , ! FD s~E DEVELOPtv1EN1 OE.CO 2 2002 KlNGCO. 0 .o.E.S. ----·---------... B-twelve Associates, Inc. 1103 W. Meeker Stree~ Suite C Kent WA 98032 SANDHU PROPERTY KING COUNTY NO. E02G0016 Wetland Analysis Report and Restoration Plan Prepared For: Mr. Kulwant Sandhu 13989 SE 159th Pl. Renton, WA 98058 August 5, 2002 Job#A2-125 RECEIVED SITE OFll~',OPMENT OE' ,02 KING CO. D.D.E.S. Phone: 253-859-0515 Fax: 253-852-4732 B-twelve Associates, Inc. 1103 W. Meeker St. Kent, WA 98032-5751 SANDHU PROPERTY KING COUNTY NO. E02G0016 WETLAND ANALYSIS REPORT AND RESTORATION PLAN (v) 253-859-0515 (~ 253-852-4732 (e) info@b12assoc.com This report describes the jurisdictional wetlands on the Sandhu property located at 12044 SE 184th St, Parcel #6199600320, in King County, WA. (See Exhibit A-Vicinity Map.) The site also includes the Parcel #6199600282, which is the Bonneville Transmission Line Right-of-Way. The total area of these two parcels together is approximately 6.3 acres. Specifically, the site is located in a portion of the SE Y,, of the NW Y,, of Section 33, Township 23 North, Range 5 East of the WM, in King County, WA. According to King County D.D.E.S., a sensitive areas violation occurred on the site; therefore, this document also discusses the proposed Restoration Plan. METHODOLOGY Darcey Miller inspected the property for jurisdictional wetlands and streams on May 7 and May 24, 2002. The wetland edges were marked with pink flagging labeled "Wetland Re: Wetland Analysis Report, Concept Mitigation Sandhu Property/ Job #A2-125/K.C.No. E02GOOI6 B-twelve Associates Page 2 of9 August 5, 2002 Delineation." The data points were marked with orange and black-striped flags labeled DP#_. A combination of field indicators, including vegetation, soils, and hydrology, were used to determine the presence of a wetland. The site was inspected using the methodology described in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (W ADOE, March 1997) and in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987). This is the methodology currently recognized by King County and the State of Washington for wetland determinations and delineations. The Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual and the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual both require the use of the three-parameter approach in identifying and delineating wetlands. A wetland should support a predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, have hydric soils and display wetland hydrology. To be considered hydrophytic vegetation, over 50% of the dominant species in an area must have an indicator status of facultative (FAC), facultative wetland (FACW), or obligate wetland (OBL), according to the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9) (Reed, 1988). A hydric soil is "a soil that is saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part". Anaerobic conditions are indicated in the field by soils with low chromas (2 or less), as determined by using the Munsell Soil Color Charts; iron oxide mottles; hydrogen sulfide odor and other indicators. Generally, wetland hydrology is defined by inundation or saturation to the surface for a consecutive period of 12.5% or greater of the growing season. Areas that contain indicators of wetland hydrology between 5%-12.5% of the growing season may or may not be wetlands depending upon other indicators. Field indicators include visual observation of soil inundation, saturation, oxidized rhizospheres, water marks on trees or other fixed objects, drift lines, etc. Under normal circumstances, indicators of all three parameters will be present in wetland areas. OBSERVATIONS Existing Site Documentation Prior to visiting the site, a review of several natural resource inventory maps was conducted. Resources reviewed included the National Wetlands Inventory Map, the King County Soil Survey (Snyder et al. 1973), and the King County Sensitive Areas Folios (King County 1990), and the King County Wetlands Inventory. According to the NWI map, two small PEMC wetlands are located on or just north of the site. (See Exhibit B.) Re: Wetland Analysis Report, Concept Mitigation Sandhu Property/Job #A2-125/K.C.No. E02G0016 B-twelve Associates Page 3 of9 August 5, 2002 The King County Soil Survey indicates Alderwood (AgB-gravelly sandy loam) soils on the site. (See Exhibit C.) Alderwood soils are moderately well-drained soils that formed under conifers, in glacial deposits. According to the publication Hydric Soils of the United States, they are not considered to be hydric (wetland) soils. Exhibit C: Re: Wetland Analysis Report, Concept Mitigation Sandhu Property/ Job #A2-125/K.C.No. E02G0016 B-rwelve Associates Page 4 o/9 August 5, 2002 The King County Sensitive Areas Folio for Streams shows a stream with wetlands located well over 200' to the east of the site. (See Exhibit D.) The stream is considered to be a salmonid stream, according to this source. The King County Wetlands Inventory depicts a large wetland, referred to as Soos Creek 2, located over 1,000' to the east of the site. This wetland is categorized as a Class 1 (c) wetland in King County. We did not observe any connection between this wetland and the wetland we flagged onsite. Field Observations-Uplands The upland areas on the site are primarily level, with a slight slope down to the east. The majority of the land was historically a pasture for livestock. The east four acres are located within the Bonneville Transmission Line Right-of-Way. A house and two sheds are located in the southwest portion of the site. The north and central areas of the site contain several recently graded piles of dirt, most of which are greater than 3' in height. An area approximately _sf in size was not graded, and includes a large red alder, Douglas fir, and Western hemlock. In much of the upland area adjacent to the wetland edge, grading/clearing did not occur, and grasses, soft rush (Juncus effuses), and spirea (Spiraea douglasii) are present. Studying aerial photographs of the area, we have Re: Wetland Analysis Report, Concept Mitigation Sandhu Property! Job #A2-125/K.C.No. E02GOOJ6 B-trvelve Associates Page 5 o/9 August 5, 2002 determined that only herbaceous vegetation was present in the recently graded areas of the site. (See Exhibit E below.) Field Observations-Wetlands One wetland was observed on the site, which is referred to as Wetland NB/C. (See Sheet W-1.) Wetland NB/C was flagged with pink "Wetland Delineation" flags labeled A-1 through A-20, Bl-B9, and Cl-CS. A channel joins the two large wetland areas on the site. This channel has the appearance of having been dug within wetland in the past. The OHWMs of the channel were flagged with white and blue-dot flags labeled Wl-WS on the west side, and El-ES on the east side. The data points associated with the wetland delineation were marked with orange and black-striped flags labeled DP#l-DP#3. B- twelve's wetland and data point flags were subsequently surveyed by Cramer Northwest, per the client's request. During a recent site visit, we observed that most of the wetland flags are missing from the site, and we have not determined what might have happened to them. Wetland A is approximately 9S,132sf (2.18ac) in size onsite, including the channel that joins that two large portions. The wetland appears to continue off site to the east of the northern section, and in the northwest comer. Two barrel culverts are located within the channel connecting the two wetland areas. These culverts have been in place for many years, according to the client and aerial photographs. This wetland is characterized by two wetland classes (scrub-shrub and emergent), as well as a forested area that is less than 20% of the total wetland size. Vegetation in the majority of the wetland includes Sitka willow (Salix sitchensis), spirea (Spirea douglasii), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor), reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea), lady fem (Athyriumfilix-femina), soft rush (Juncus effusus), and creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens). The small forested area is composed primarily of Sitka willow. The channel within the wetland contains spirea and soft rush. Soil pits excavated within the wetland revealed very moist gravelly sandy loam with the matrix color of IOYR 3/2 with redoximorphic features. (See attached data forms.) Hydrologic indicators include saturation, inundation, and water marks. Hydrologic inputs to the wetland appear to be precipitation, runoff from surrounding uplands, and possibly a groundwater source. We observed slow southerly flow within the channel connecting the two wetland areas. An outlet from the south portion of the wetland was not observed. Debris such as discarded building material and furniture were observed near the edges of the wetland and in portions of the buffer. An old rusted barrel is located near the existing ditch culverts, and an old, small, wooden footbridge is located south of these culverts. Re: Wetland Analysis Report, Concept Mitigation Sandhu Property! Job #A2-l 25/K. C.No. E02GOOl 6 B-twelve Associates Page 6 of9 August 5, 2002 According to the United States Fish and Wildlife (USFWS) wetland classification method (Cowardin et al. 1979), Wetland A/B/C contains areas that would be classified as PSSlC (palustrine, scrub-shrub, broad-leaved deciduous, seasonally flooded) and PEMlC (palustrine, emergent, persistent, seasonally flooded). According to the King County Code (Section 21A.06.1415), Wetland A would be categorized as a Class 2 wetland, because it is greater than 1 acre in size. Typically, wetlands of this type are required have a 50' buffer measured from the wetland edge, as well as a 15' BSBL (building setback line) measured from the wetland buffer edge (K.C.21A.24.320). EXISTING IMPACTS As stated in the letters from King County dated January 31 and February 6, 2002, a violation has occurred on the property. Our observations and research lead us to agree generally with the County's charges. These violations are as follows: 1) Grading in excess of 100 cubic yards and 3 feet in depth without a valid grading permit, 2) Clearing portions of the site without a valid clearing permit, and 3) clearing and grading within a Class 2 wetland buffer without the necessary permits. No new fill dirt has been brought onto the site since 1998, when 100 cubic yards of dirt was brought in under an approved 1998 grading permit. This dirt was located in five piles of dirt of approximately 20 cubic yards each. Therefore, the violation consists of moving this dirt, as well as scraping 8-10" of dirt off the surface of much of the total disturbed area. Pat Anderson of Anderson Engineering calculated that approximately 167 cubic yards of dirt was scraped off the surface and moved around. Therefore, the total amount of excavation is approximately 267 cubic yards. Mounds that served as jumps for dirtbikes are currently located on the site. The mounds range from 2' high to approximately 8' high. Two mounds are located near the barrel culverts and channel. An herbaceous community composed of different grass species has grown over the majority of the cleared areas. Approximately 60,396 sf (1.39 ac) was cleared and graded on the site, during January 2002. According to aerial photographs from August 2000, the only vegetation in these cleared areas appears to have been herbaceous. (See Exhibit E.) As stated above, it appears that the clearing/grading occurred within the wetland buffer only, and not in wetlands. Approximately 13,549 sf (0.31ac) of wetland buffer was cleared and graded on the site. The clearing appears to have been completed only in areas that were vegetated with grasses and other low groundcover. Re: Wetland Analysis Report, Concept Mitigation Sandhu Property/ Job #A2-125/K.C.No. E02GOOJ6 B-twelve Associates Page 7 of9 August 5, 2002 Exhibit E: Aerial Photograph, WSDOT (8/23/00) PROPOSED RESTORATION PLAN The restoration plan proposes to restore the site to a condition similar to its state before Winter 2002. All dirt mounds currently located on the site will be leveled out. These are the only areas that will be disturbed again; the areas that are already fairly level will not Re: Wetland Analysis Report, Concept Mitigation Sandhu Property/ Job #A2-I25/K.C.No. E02GOOI6 B-twelve Associates Page 8 of9 August 5, 2002 be touched, so that the grasses colonizing there can remain intact. Because only an herbaceous stratum was present on the site before the violation occurred, we recommend that all disturbed or bare areas be seeded with a native grass seed mix. (See Sheet W-1.) In addition, all of the garbage that is currently present in the wetland and/or buffer will be removed. The straw that acts as the temporary erosion/sedimentation control will remain in place. Before the minor grading occurs, additional hay will be placed along the edge of clearing where needed. The owner of the site will be applying for a building permit on the site within the next 6 months. We expect the construction to begin within the next year and a half. The development may propose a minimal amount of buffer width averaging, but otherwise will not impact sensitive areas. Because development will likely commence within the next year, we recommend that a monitoring schedule not be required. However, if the site is not developed, a 3-year monitoring program will be completed. We believe that the proposed Restoration Plan meets the requirements stated in the King County Code, and will benefit the sensitive areas onsite. Please feel free to call our office at (253) 859-0515 if you have any questions or require any additional information. Sincerely, B-twelve Associates . // Ur.cY~y 8. )~ Darcey B. Miller Wetlands Ecologist Encl. Sheet W-1: Existing Conditions Map Wetland Data Forms File: dm/A2125-wa-restdoc Re: Wetland Analysis Report, Concept Mitigation Sandhu Property/ Job #A2-125/K.C.No. E02GOOJ6 B-nvelve Associates Page 9of9 August 5, 2002 REFERENCES Cowardin, L., V. Carter, F. Golet, and E. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-79- 31, Washington, D. C. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. King County Sensitive Areas Folios. December 1990. King County Zoning Code: Title 21A. 1999. Mueller-Dombois, D. and H. Ellenberg. 1974. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, New York. Munsell Color. 1988. Munsell Soil Color Charts. Kollmorgen Instruments Corp., Baltimore, Maryland. National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. 1991. Hydric Soils of the United States. USDA Misc. Publ. No. 1491. Reed, P., Jr. 1988. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). 1988. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Inland Freshwater Ecology Section, St. Petersburg, Florida. Snyder, D., P. Gale, and R. Pringle. 1973. Soil Survey King County Area Washington. U.S.D.A., Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C. USDA NRCS & National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils, September 1995. Field Indicators ofHydric Soils in the United States -Version 2.1 Washington State Dept. of Ecology. 1987. Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. Pub. No. 96-94 Washington State Department of Fisheries. November 1975. A Catalog of Washington Streams and Salmon Utilization. Vol. l. ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM (Washington State Wetlands Identification & Delineation Manual, 1997) B-7WEL VE ASSOCIATES, INC. 1103 West Meeker Street, Suite C Kent, Washington 98032 (253) 859-0515 ~ ~ #A 7.,§" lj ProiectName/#:, JCV'td 1.,/f Date: 5 OZ. 1nvesti=1or: 'D. M ~I /er Data Point I Jurisdiction: • ,I Al?a r .,, State: ,.,n A "-ical Anal•~is: Problem Area: J VEGETATION Do~plan! ~es . . Stratum ~~ld Coverage% I. . ~' IV....., ~t hn 1/l'h 12. ;: c.-,,v-1 J,f!-v.5 Fll tJ 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10; 5£21, Hydrophytic vegetation criteria met Yes No ~"2 % of species OBL, FACW and/orFAC: Comments: d SOILS mad. wd.1 MappcdSoilSeries: 6:/dvuutitJ OnHydricSoilsList?:Yes mo) ~Class: ~th(O in) b '1 /!. ~auix color Redcx concentratio'n-dlor Texture ~ L ~ 2-. o#, . 7, S:: ,)' 5 ....-,r .SL . _m. _in. Organic soil_, His tic epipedon _, Hydrogen sulfide_, g/eyed _, redox concentrations_, redox depletions_, pore linings_, iron concretions_, manganese concretions_, organic matter in surface horizon (sandy soil)_, organic streaking (sandy soils)_, organic pan (sandy soil)_. ~YIAC! ?. 2-o.~ I Yi d, . (" c,_fo.,,:5, Hydtic soil criteria met: Yes ~Basis: 1 IQ Q Comments: ( HYDROLOGY Recorded data_, inundation saturation -511 drift lines __ , sediment deposits drainage , watermarks patterns . 6 Ja:lwi a:fz trn-/ Basis: Wetland hydrology criteria met~Mo Comments: SUMMARY OF CRITERIA Soil Temp. at 19.7" depth: Growing Seaso~ Hydrophytic vegetation:..¥@) Hydric soils: Y . · W~ydrology~ Data point meets the criteria of a jurisdictional wetland?: Yes o '---" ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM (Washington State Wetlands Identification & Delineation Manual, 1997) B-TWELVEASSOCIATES, INC. 1103 West Meeker Street, Suite C Kent, Washington 98032 (253) 859-0515 c ~ AZ//l-r-~ 7 i2--Investi-tor: 7) . AA ; I I e/nata Point: 2-Pro;ect Name/#: ·, A,VI Date: Jurisdiction: . · 1/ ,I Mn ( I -State: !, ill I Ah-ical Anal•-"•: Problem Area: ) VEGETATION Dominant ptt specid _ StrallDn ~~ Coverage% l. P-iA 113 ~ S i: 'i:~±;;£ !?#puw5 1-1 _c.,, l s 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. % of species OBL, FACW and/orFAC: cQ_zi Hydrophytic vegetation criteria n:@,s No Man,ina] Conunents: Mapped Soil SeriesA l~ WD ccJ SOILS YhC,.d, wJJ On Hydric Soils List?: Yes a Drainage Class: Depth(O in) I<. I Matrix cowr Redox concentratio or Texture z_· =()_~ ?_ ~ fpL • ~ '; () & -'.(~ z_ c..m. /JI I ' _m. _n ~ Organic soil_, Histic epipedon_, Hydrogen sulfoJe _., gleyed _, redox concentrations 2 redox depletwns :._, pore linings_, iron concretions_, manganese concretwns_, organic matter in sr,iface horizon (sandy soil)_, organic streaking (sandy soils)_, organic pan (sandy~ a)M,,OYl/v;_ 2-j//)1()~ Hydric soil criteria es Basis: Conunents: . HYDROLOGY Recorded data_, inundation , saturation -3 ~ watermarks , drift lines____, sediment deposits __ , drainage patterns . fl c5divia led a,{JiWf -12,'1 Basis: W ctland hydrology criteria : Yes No Comments: S~Y OF CRITERIA Soil Temp. at 19.7" depth: Growing Season?· Hydrophytic vegetation~ · Hydric so~ 1 ~etland hydrology~ Data point meets the criteria of a jurisdictional wetland . Y cs No \. ___./ ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM (Washington Staie Wetlands Identification & Delineation Manual, 1997) B-TWEL VE ASSOCIATES, INC. 1103 West Meeker Street, Suite C Kent, Washington 98032 (253) 859-0515 Pro;ect Name/II: ./3 ~ rw.._./ #-A 2-J'tf.ie: c::-/ 1 /6 Z--Investi=tor: T). M fl \-pf Data Point: · ?-; Jurisdiction: . .y; Ul/i ''"· I State: I ,. ,, ., I A+•-ical Anal .... •: . Problem Area: ' ' J VEGETATION Do~bm~ ~ .( s~ lndica~I,) Coverage% 1-17~ ~: ~=t'~ftif0 ~~ 3. ~ C. u S ...() S: 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. % of species OBL, FACW and/or FAC: [OD Hydrophytic vegetation criteria me'e5Y:t:!o Mamnal Comments: Mapped Soil Series: /A irlJ.A Lvocd On Hy<hic Soils r!~:~ 61. ))rainage Class: fh@ wdl Depth(O in) } Matrix color Redox concentrawn_ or S~~ ~() l it· ID ':J.I<_ l., I , m. , ,s-'l.."R.. oZ3 . 7 (_, 9 r~ ;t:::a;; z,,q_n, _m. _in. Organic soil_, Histic epipedon _, Hydrogen sulfide__, gleyed _, redox concentrations__, redox depletions_, pore lining,__, iron concretions_, manganese concretions_, organic matter in surface horizon (sandy soil)_, organic streaking (sandy soils)_, organic pan (sandy soil~ c}VvVYV1 ci ';2. z. . Hy<hic soil criteria m,t: Yes :) Basis: Comments: Recorded data_, inundation ~HYDROLOGY saturation watermarks . drift lines__, sediment deposits drainage patterns . f-} Basis: Wetland hydrology criteria me-= No Comments: SUMMARY OF CRITERIA Soil Temp. at 19.7" depth: Growing Season?:Q:lli . Hydrophytic vegetation~ Hydric soils:~ . ~-,etland hydrolo~ Data point meets the cri of a jurisdictional we ?:_ es No \._..../ King County Vepartment of Vevelopment and Environmental Senrices 900 Ou.lu ... u.idnlc. Awnuc Southwt"l;t Renton, WA 900!i5-1119 Application number assigned: ParcelNumber: (o/C/'1{,z0Q32-Q 1 &;/CfC/(,;;002,62...., , Legal Description: Je_e_ 5Urve..ut / tfcf2_o,,t -r I , Address of proposed work: _ __;_\ ..::'d..;__o_l.{..,__,'f'-------=-S---=-~--\~8"-'---'llt--.S-=-t.:....c...' _ Related Permits or PreApp number: __________ _ t.02 f:;001 lo Descriptive summary of proposed work: --------------------------- Check .i1!/applicable items This is: rn1;rading G'Clearing This is associated w/: D Single Family D Duplex or Multi-Family D Commercial/Industrial D Plat/Subdivision D Agricultural D Other Property Owner: k vl l-w It N I SA I\/ ..D H UTelephone Number: tr~...-:i. :1. & -&' 3 2.f Mailing Address: 13:18'.1 f~ IS'1 fLCity: fv,,,,ti. ..... State: wa. Zip: ~s(j" Applicant Name: k \.( L w I'\ tJ T S' ~NJ) k IJ Telephone Number: <.,~-:2 ')._ 6 ~ 3 .z.J Mailing Address: l3j ?j SE Jrcr PLcity: Reen~"' State:tvct Zip: 9'if<JS<;i1 Contact/ Agent Name: B-·fu,e. (ve.. mtcrq .4n1ephone Number: c~ '5'""3) g'iq .,.a 5 I) ·7Jar-c&/ f'h i if" J/ L · ' Mailing Address: /(0 7i W. M Mk! 5f City: /<-e-v!T State: JM.J/zip: 1%'0~L Sensitive Area Compliance: The undersigned applicant declares: 1. That the applicant is competent to be a witness herein; 2. That the applicant is the applicant for the above project; 3. That to the best of the applicant's knowledge, the sensitive areas on the development proposal site have not been illegally altered; and 4. That the applicant has not previously been found in violation of sensitive areas regulations for any property in King County, or alternatively, that if there have been any violations, such violations have been cured to the satisfaction of King County. I am submitting for a permit authorized by King County Code 16.82 Grading, and in anticipation of having it approved or approved with conditions I have read the following statement and understand that failure to comply with all conditions once construction is begun may necessitate an immediate work stoppage until such time as compliance with the stipulated conditions is attained. I certify that I have made a diligent inquiry regarding the need for concurrent state or federal permits to engage in the work requested under this building permit, and no such permits are required or I will have obtained the required permits prior to issuance of this permit. I understand that the granting of this permit shall not be construed as satisfying the requirements of other applicable Federal, State or Local laws or regulations. In addition I understand and agree that this permit does not authorize the violation of regulations. In addition, I understand and agree that this clearing and/or grading permit does not authorize the violation of the Endangered Species Act as set forth at 16 U.S.C. § 1531-1543, including the piohib1ticn en the "take" of threatened vr endangered species. "Take'' is defined at 16 U.S.C. § 1532(19). I fully understand that it is my sole responsibility to determine whether such "take" restrictions would be violated by work done pursuant to this permit, and I understand that I am precluded by Federal Law from undertaking work authorized by.this permit if that work would violate the "take" restrictions set forth at 16 U.S.C. §1538, so C.F.R. §17.21, so C.F.R. §17.31, so C.F.R. §223 and so C.F.R. §224. I certify under penalty of perjury and under the laws of the State of Washington the foregoing is true and correct. I further certify that all easements, deed restrictions, or other encumbrances restricting the use of the property are shown on the site plans submitted with this application. I accept financial responsibility for all fees associated with this permit or approval and will receive any refunds. Please mail any refunds to the address above. Applicant Signature ~ f ~ Date,_7,.:_.--...:~:...o_~_J._.('f>_· _t)._ King County Dep.irtment of Development and Environment.a.] Services 900 0.akesda.le Avenue S.W. Renton, W,uhington 980S5·12-19 General Instructions Part l of this form must be completed prior to scheduling a preapplication meeting with Land Use Services Division {LUSD). Call LUSD Site Development Services Section at (206) 296-6640 or complete and return the. attached meeting request form to arrange your preapplication meeting. Part II of this form must be completed by DDES staff prior to application. Part Ill of this fonm will be completed by DDES staff prior to application. PART I: Project Name: , )g,vid )~ Description of Project: Parcel#: G,, l'r1{eOb3po 1 b I 1ft, 06ZZ'2.- (lf multiple parcels, attaoh wparate page) Phone No.: = ~ .i 6 -Y ~ ;2., lf Lot: Block: Tract: __ _ Location: l 2, o ~Y S E; I 8::1..{ , ;-+- Street Address: R.,;e.. OTh V\ ' Owner: ~ f=.. Address-:=======::z::============= z Phone No.:._~/..__ ________ _ Note: If the applicant is other than the owner, authorization from the legal owner must be provided. Agent: t.L-~ /73SOC, . ~~~~:~o.!!$BJ¥t(r 01 fp t: iuA 9fO 3 2-. ~ ·. . ,i9)j('>' Proposed Scope of Work; 7 · ?Ji> '\" '(Y Total quantity of excavation: ,..., 2& cubic yards It!' · Total quantity of fill: _____ cubic yards J IHI ~If CV1JI"' i,./<l..O b, kr To.ta! quantity of imported fill: cubic yards 1i,, v-,d..,,, 1q9 g-~l...jJ- Total quantity of exported excavation: cubic yards · ,-· · ·-, Total size of site: G,,3 Total area~ cleared.or graded: {. 31 Percentage of work to be completed during the first year: acres acres ir,-k,J c/ff)rld. /60 % PART II: This portion of the worksheet will be completed by the Grading Unit at the time bf the preapplication meeting. Pe.rmit Type: ~j lje5f1>va:t1 fu Related Proj. No./Name: f::62.('..,--QO lb ··~. Inspection Area: _ _,~"""'"-""'"------- FEES; Plan Review fees: Total Volume: c.y. Cleared or Graded Area ______ acres Operating Fees: Volume: Unreclaimed Area: Other (list) SEPA: Drainage: Sens Area: ------c.y. ______ acres Yes: __ Yes: __ Yes: __ No: __ No:_ No:_ Credits (list): Penalties (list) $ ____ _ Charge Penalties to :. _____ _ (SIERRA ACTIVITY#) Other: _____________________________ _ ru/P,V.l·SOSS,Wrd 01/lO/" ll:2'1 AX/dj Page l Part Ill Additional Information: List any pending or issued permits or approvals that may affect processing o( this application. £o,2-&DD/b on or adjacent to this property. Of. Has a previous environmental determination been completed for this proposal? Yes_ No_ Is a stomi drainage plan being submitted with this proposal? Yes V No_ Submittal Requirements: Quantity I 15 /5 .. 3 Description Application Work·sheet • Grading Plan · Environmental Checklist Environmental Determination Quantity Calculations. Drainage Plan/Cales Solls/Geotech Report Wetlands/Stream Report certification of Sensitive Areas Compliance (3 34. Oo) Certification of Applicant Status and/or Transfer of Applicant Status · , Z • . Current Assessor's Maps & List of tax parcels for public notice when required Legal Description (may be Included on site plan) J Variance/Reasonable Use Exception . . Estimated Application Fees o~ or o.-p p I, <:ct..,+ , o--n ,3 Payment Schedule · · Other. ~e;_;;t·1C>r1 en/\ other:=0,,AJff = /Af>f1, cc.J:,~ • Grading plan shall Include al a minimum the follov.ing lnfonmaUon unless specifically waived: vicinity, topography. dimensions, clearlng limits, open spac:e 1 NGPE's, conservation easements, drainage ays1.ems, buildings, structures, landscape and restoration plans, ~nsltive 11reas end essocl21ted butrens and other tnrormaUon as may be required by the director. For purposes of this application, the following items are considered waived unless specifically requested above: Fire District receipt, current Certificate of Water Availability, proof that the lot(s) are recognized as separate lots, Certificate of Sewer Availability or site percolation date with preliminary Seattle King County Health Department Approval, Certificate of Future Connection for Sewer or Water if in Urban growth area, and Certificate of Transportation Concurrency. This completed form must be signed by a represent~tive of the Grading Unit and must accompany the completed permit application or the application will not be accepted. This approval includes a waiver for purposes of application, those items more specifically noted aoove. Approved by: ~ /. fv-J~ Date: 2. / 27, O 2- Application Accepted By: ____________ _ Date_/_/_ The applicant understands that signing and submitting this application authorizes DOES staff to inspect the site at any reasonable time.for the purpose of permit review. Signed:._~_. __ .---'-·-=~=-=-...:::· =-----------Date: 7-3D-02.. r9'IP.JJ.1-f0SS.Wrd 0(/20/U 1112'7 N't/dj Poage 2 King County . Uepar1111ent of Development and Environmental Sen,ices Rer11011, \VA !lt\O.'i.'i-1.'.!lY ·· Affidavit for Jl.pplicati.on · ··F··o·· <ir····•··•mi•····••>>· .. : :::: ,· ::·: :: ·: -<·:-:-:':. Application number assigned:-------- Parcel Number: &Jf?; 11 /p ()rJ3c2Q) (p/ L "l&00 ;Jg,) Legal Description:---------------------------------- Address of proposed work: L3DL/l/ SE lol/~ J-t,, Renton /<.~. t-J o ~ Qc]. f; o o I (o Related Permits or PreApp number: Check .i!L/ applicable items This is: ~ding &tClearing This is associated w/: D Single Family D Plat/Subdivision Property Owner: }L'., tA \ wa,,vit StUt dh \A.. /vi fu.+u.(e CiDuplex or Multi-Family D Agricultural D Commercial/Industrial if Other V io ( af,'ox., Telephone Number: -------- Mailing Address: r 31 ~ 4 5E rs:q~ p~ify: f!@rcf~n State: Wt]_ Zip: Applicant Name: k, (Al WCl...N'\ + ~cih,u_ Telephone Number: tfdJ5-~;i.(p-g3;:i..g Mailing Address: Sc:l.h'\.L ...?-City: State: __ Zip: Contact/Agent Name: s~iwe:lre, &,5Ds-'f?tf.fi~Telephone Number: c? S3-&59-cJSIS Mailing Address: J ID3 w. ~ Jt. City: /<..u.,,nt: State: ./ilL8. Zip: no~ Sensitive Area Compliance: The undersigned applicant declares: 1. That the applicant is competent to be a witness herein; 2. That the applicant is the applicant for the above project; 3. That to the best of the applicant's knowledge, the sensitive areas on the development proposal site have not been illegally altered; and 4. That the applicant has not previously been found in violation of sensitive areas regulations for any property in King County, or alternatively, that if there have been any violations, such violations have been cured to the satisfaction of King County. I am submitting for a permit authorized by King County Code 16.82 Grading, and in anticipation of having it approved or approved with conditions I have read the following statement and understand that failure to comply with all conditions once construction is begun may necessitate an immediate work stoppage until such time as compliance with the stipulated conditions is attained. I certify that I have made a diligent inquiry regarding the need for concurrent state or federal permits to engage in the work requested under this building permit, and no such permits are required or I will have obtained the required permits prior to issuance of this permit. I understand that the granting of this permit shall not be construed as satisfying the requirements of other applicable Federal, State or Local laws or regulations. In addition I understand and agree that this permit does not authorize the vioialion of regulations. In addition, I understand and agree that this clearing and/or grading permit does not authorize the violation of the Endangered Species Act as set forth at 16 U.S.C. § 1531-1543, including the prohibition on the "take" of threatened or endangered species. "Take" is defined at 16 U.S.C. § 1532(19). I fully understand that it is my sole responsibility to determine whether such "take" restrictions would be violated by work done pursuant to this permit, and I understand that I am precluded by Federal Law from undertaking work authorized by this permit if that work would violate the "take" restrictions set forth at 16 U.S.C. §1538, 50 C.F.R. §17.21, 50 C.F.R. §17.31, 50 C.F.R. §223 and 50 C.F.R. §224. I certify under penalty of perjury and under the laws of the State of Washington the foregoing is true and correct. I further certify that all easements, deed restrictions, or other encumbrances restricting the use of the property are shown on the site plans submitted with this application. I accept financial responsibility for all fees associated with this permit or approval and will receive any refunds. Please mail any refunds to the address above. Applicant Signature, __ _Jl~-=:.:::~=:...:::::=:::....-· ~£..r!:>.!!e!:..,C&-....,.,J,!I,!!,"""----Date . Clearing and Grading Permits Application Fee Worksheet (Attachment to Bulletin 28) App I ica n t __...t(-+,-"'\J.,.,...,w...,o ... w ..... +..__.S .... cJl"--· "'-clh"---_L>v ___ _ Permit Application No.-------- Worksheet Prepared By k, Ne»,/&; ,.rf) GRADING/CLEARING REVIE'.W AND OTHER REVIEWS AND MISCELLANEOUS INSPECTION FEES CHARGES Grading Base Review Fees Sensitive Areas Review Base Fees Residential ProJect w/o SEPA Basic Review $302.50, no hrly ffi2,D0 0.00 -0. 1 ac. $181.50, no hrly Res. Complex $682.00, 4 Y, hr O 11 -O 3 ac. $363.00, no hrly . Non-res Complex $907.50, 6 hr 0.31 -1.0 ac. $726.00, inc. 4 hr 101-5.0ac. $1089.00, inc. 6 hr I C>R9,na Other Reviews (charged hourly, minimum deposits noted) over 5.0 ac $1452.00. inc. 8 hr Drainage 4.0 hrs $528.00 With SEPA $726.00. inc. 4 hr SEPA 6.0 hrs $792.00 -?92.,Q'O Zoning 2.0 hrs $264.00 ' Non-Residential ProJect __ hrs@ $132.00 0.00 -0. 1 ac. $363.00, 2 hr __ hrs@ $132.00 0.11-0.3ac $726.00, 4 hr . __ hrs@ $132.00 0.31 -1.0 ac. $1452.00, 8 hr 1 01 -5.0 ac. $2904.00, 16 hr Miscellaneous Clearing/Grading Fees 5.01 -10 ac. $5808.00, 32 hr /~.OD 10.01 -20 ac. $8712.00, 48 hf Intake Fee $187.00 over 20 ac. $11616.00, 64 hr Issuance Fee $187.00 t~7-DZ> Clearing Base Review Fees Revision Base Fee $181.50 Residential Project w/o SEPA (all time charged hourly) 0.00 -0.2 ac. $181.50, no hrly 0.21 -2.0 ac. $495.00, no hrly Hazard Tree Removal (Hourly) over2.0 ac. $726 00, 4 hr hours@ $132.00/hr With SEPA $726.00, 4 hr FPA Moratorium Relief Base Fee Non-residential Project Basic $363.00, inc. 2 hrs o.oo -0.2 ac. $550.00 3 hr Complex $2178.00, inc. 12 hrs 0.21 -2.0 ac. $1089.00 6 hr 1:02.-l, l® over 2.0 ac. $2178.00 12 hr Total Fees due at AppUcation (3,234.lJQ) Adjustments to Base Review Fees Comments: Investigation Fee equal to Base Fee l o'-i?q, o t> Sensitive Areas Adj. (plus 50%) Priority Review (plus 50%) . Total Base Review Fees 2...l 7B.DD (Permit review lhal exceeds lhe base .amounls will be Approved By: ( Yr.-rJu • Y\ n , . >~ invoiced, excepl as otherwise noted, for aclual lime spent) . -S@IDevelopment Specialist lns12ection Fees <q-20-oz. Date: Grading Inspection .:~:~"'r:orading Residential -Hrly; -hrs@ $132 Permit Type __ Clearing Non-residential 0.00-0. 1 ac. $264, inc. 2 hr --Grading SF __ Clearing SF O 11 -0.3 ac. $264, inc. 2 hr 0.31 -1.0 ac. $528, inc. 4 hr __ Other (list) 1.01 -5.0 ac. $528, inc. 4 hr 501-10ac. $1056, inc. 8 hr Permit Application Number 1001-20 ac. $1056, inc. 8 hr UvwDVd or-.{.,r~ over 20 ac. $1584, inc. 12 hr , Pro1e~t Descripl1on: . Clearing Inspection i r c...r;.-co vc,rl 'l:l:n o ..C: \.N/"':}-[ Q eid_ Residential -Hrly; _ hrs@$132 !<'. (A .i . V\/ w <:a.f) oLtc l,L, Non-residential Applicant 0.00 -0.2 ac. $264, inc. 2 hr I :Sq i 9. s~ La;5+1, PI 0.21 -2.0 ac. $528, inc 4 hr Address over 2.0 ac. $528, inc. 4 hr 1? C: I'"\ +J:;y"\. wA 0ro~i Minimum Inspection Fees, Phone (Inspection costs will be invoiced based upon lime actually E-mail spent less credit for the pre-paid amounts shown) Cleanng Grading Permits App Fee Worksheet Bulletin 28 Is ,wks-clg r628 .pd I 05/31/02 Page 2 of 2 ! King county DepAnmerii ol Oe ... e1opmen1 ana Erwironmerital Ser-,,,1ces Land Use Ser.iieu OiYislon 900 Oakesdale Avenue Sow1hw&S! Ren1on. Wa.shinQlon 98055-12i9 (206J 296-6600 TTY (206} 296°7217 Clearing and Grading Permits Application Fee Worksheet (Attachment to Bulletin 28 I Alternative formats available upon request Grading and Clearing Permit review and inspection fees are calculated using both base fees and hourly fees. The total cost of a permit will vary depending upon the complexity of the project and the number of ancillary reviews that are required to complete lhe application review (e.g., drainage, SEPA or sensitive area review). Base review and inspection fees are estimated using target hours. Target hOurs are intended 10 provide staff and lhe applicant a very general estimate of the.time to complete certain standard reviews. Target hours for inspection functions represent minimum inspection levels. If target hours are exceeded, additional reviews and inspections will be billed at the department's current hourly rate of $132 per hour. Certain reviews. such as drainage and SEPA review. are billed at $132 for each hour of review lime. DOES collects a deposit at the time of application submittal up 10 50% of lhe anticipated hourly charges for the project. Direct hourly charges in excess of deposit amounts. or charges in excess of base fees. will be billed 10 you monthly. Finance charges will accrue if invoices are not paid in a 1imely manner In addition 10 the standard review and inspection fees applicable to alt permit 1ipplica1ions, certain other fees and base fee adjustments may be applicable 10 clearing and grading projects. These include. but are not limited 10: Counter Service Fees -Intake fees will be assessed for all permi1 applications except miscellaneous clearing permits. which are assessed hourly cMrges. Issuance fees will be assessed for all clearing ano grading applications. except shon form permils. Investigation fees -1nves1iga1ion lees are assessed any time work proceeds prior 10 issuance of a permit. lnves1iga11on fees are equal 10 \he amounl of the base review fee. Sensitive Areas -In addition 10 standard sensilive area review lees. base fees can be increased by fifty percenl ii the proposed project includes work that may affect sensitive areas. Other review fees may be assessed during the course of pro1ec1 review ii the pro1ec1 or scope of the project is panicularly complex. DOES makes every effon 10 notify customers when lhese additional reviews are required. In some cases. pro1ec1s can be modi lied 10 avoid · additional reviews. I have read the foregoing and unders\and that lhe es\imaled lees contained on \his worksheet are on!y an estimale and !he actu·al cost of this permit will depend upon lhe review services required and the-complexi1y of !he proposed project I accept financial responsibility for all lees associated wilh this permit or approval. Applicanl Signature ~~Da1e lJ·wkJ.,:.19r8 2 8 .PO( OS!)\102 Pa9e1or2 . 'I' November 19, 2002 Ms. Kathy Newborn King County DDES Land Use Services Division 900 Oaksdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Re: Sandhu Property B-twelve Job #A2-125 King County No. E02G0016 Dear Kathy, 8-twelve Associates, Inc. 1103 W. Meeker St. Kent, WA 98032-5751 (v) 253-859-0515 in 253-852-4 732 (e) info@b12assoc.com Per Mr. Sandhu's request, we are submitting the following pieces of information for the Grading Permit Application. Please be aware that the client is preparing a preliminary site plan for development of the site. He will be applying for a voluntary Pre-application Meeting with King County within the next few weeks. He has obtained a Certification of Transportation Concurrency that will expire in less than one year. (See attached.) We are in the process of delineating the remainder of the wetland edges onsite. A surveyor has been contracted to locate those flags and complete a full topographic survey. l. Application worksheet-See attached. 2. Grading Plan-Applicant will present a final grading plan and drainage plan in association with the development proposal. We are currently coordinating this process with K.C.D.D.E.S., Land Use Section. We believe that regrading the site only once will have less overall impact on resources and sensitive areas. 3. Environmental Checklist-See attached letter from engineer, which states that the amount of disturbance within sensitive area buffers is approximately 200-250 cubic yards. Therefore, it does not appear that SEPA should be required for the sensitive areas -violation. Please note that the SEPA Checklist will be completed for the development proposal. Thus, the grading that has already occurred outside of the sensitive areas will be covered under SEP A. 4. Quantity Calculations-See attached letter by Mark Stiefel, P.E. 5. Drainage Plan-See attached Sheet W-1, which shows that silt fencing will be installed along the limits of disturbance. Nearly all of the disturbed areas on the site are .•. . ~ Re: Sandhu Property King Co. No.E02G0016 /B-twelve Job #A2-125 B-twelve Associates November 19, 2002 Page 2 of2 currently stabilized with straw and/or grasses; however, areas still uncovered will be mulched within the next 2 weeks. Please note that a detailed Drainage Plan will be completed during the development process. 6. Wetlands/Stream Report-See attached. 7. Certification of Applicant Status-See attached. 8. Estimated Application Fees-See attached. We have subtracted the SEP A fee of $792 from the amount submitted to the County, because we do not believe SEPA is necessary at this point in time. (See engineer's letter.) 9. Affidavit for Application Form-See attached. 10. Other: Certificate for Transportation Concurrency-See attached certificate. The applicant will use this information for the development proposal. Please feel free to call our office if you have any questions regarding this request for a Grading Permit. Sincerely, B-twelve Associates ~e-cr:; 1:f ,;c{Lt{___ Darcey B.....Millerc__ ___ ~ Wetland Ecologist File: dmlA2125-KCcover.doc MARK W. STIEFEL, P.E. CONSULTING• CIVIL ENGINEERING• PLANNING• PROJECT MANAGEMENT• WETLAND PERMITTING June 25, 2003 Ms. Darcy Miller B-Twelve Associates, Inc. I I 03 W Meeker Street, Suite C Kent, WA 98032 Tel (253)-852-2760 RECEIVED SITE DEVELOPMENT JUN 2 7 2003 KING CO. 0.0.E.S. /.J;zcG,1/og Subject: Sandhu Grading Restoration Project (L02CG408) [) EV I s I Q N Transmittal of Engineering Mitigation Plans & Estirr, Dear Darcy: Transmitted herein for your information and inclusion in a formal submittal to King County Department of Design and Environmental Services (DOES) are the following documents. This information is provided at the owner's request to satisfy DOES grading violation notice requirements. I understand you will provide the wetland and buffer mitigation planting plans and related estimates for use by the County in determining any bonding requirement amounts. • Three copies of Civil Engineering Plans & Specifications C-1 through C-5 • Three copies of Topographic Survey prepared by Cramer NW, Inc. • Three copies of Engineer's Estimate for grading mitigation work for bond amounts Transmitted under separate cover are additional copies of the documentation for the Owner, the Surveyor, and your office files. Should you or DOES require additional information, please contact me at (253) 854-7472. Sincerely, ,-7/. / ~_/ , t·((~et~:;,~~ . Mark W. Stiefel, P .E. • Project Civil Engineer Enclosures: Cc: Kulwant Sandhu-Owner (2 copies of submittal documents) Darcy Miller -B-Twelve (I copy of submittal documents) Cramer NW, Inc. ( 1 copy of submittal documents) MWS/mws C:\winword\228 Sandhu\Transmittal letter to B-Twelve.doc 22312 113th AVE SE KENT, WASHINGTON 98031-2651 TEL: /253) 854-7472 CELL: /206) 300-5853 FAX: /253} 854-1575 EMAIL: stiefet_eng@msn.com ., e 1 ·-I I -~ ' l i ' i .;,;;';-t[:J86 '1M ·11,]r ] 5 ]f'\3.'.\' 1-H~LL Z1f2;.~ '.}t,: d~t-.::C.:·N~ l~JJllS . )._ 8S886 ·'l:J_ )~J.--lSt0,1 '-IC. \Jt l]Jc;~S I-H8L JS ~:-C!,L ~ ;,::; ,·.i.':i,1 I il.'' ,·,1 f, ! ,;·1~·/- ' ' ' ' i ,, ":I- ' ~ C [ ,, z C u , c, 0 '~ 0 u " B f s, \; ~' " f, ",, / @---;- ---~ ,,' I •' ! ' ' '' ;: ,, ,, 31 i,~ ;"..:~ ~ '""'·ti"''"" ra,,,,,, "'"' 0 1 illi •• <;.:_0;,-1"','i:<-1c,-,; X'o'J "{.:\'i--:,<_;2-,'.z;2:; lCL .S'.?~ -LZ:JS6 vM '1 SJJ;~ ]r\1:./11' "1l't.L z:.zn: ')'<1C3c'"<1S~l.3 l..:'.:i~.lS ~-----------, ' 3 ' ,,..,, '"""' -'~_"!':!'.""'" J ~-:l!IN:J.l\' HJ.OC:i (0,:,,, -.. .-.... , ;,;:..;-:-...-...,; i..,;,J -.,-.,;:, ;.,-;-;~ ... - r,..,.,,.., .... ,a,,,.,,,.,.,, :;;c;: NC1s,,...,S1M ·r,,ic.rnc ITl/::_S ,-u.-<s, :C':: 7-t'<j(L '2 A_:iJcCCc ilH::r-S'S 11,;':'Mlf:·o £ t > ~ e ill t• i •• ~ ~ : [l_ 2 I --;.;;,-.,,;/,;!J!;'{;.f:):.cHJ;:}L=-;-... - .. -'. ,., --. !:r.¥~"','."°!(! _/ 0 ~ '" ' ,,, " e s 5 0 " 2 ' _.J; ~. ' aY/..:. :~,1,1~1: 1-!i (i!! ~ ' ~ woo ' S,:.s;.-,r,8-ii:;~·, A'l; ~.:.t-.:.-v'~C'-'.:.-;~' lJ~ / rs·3Z>1rn86 v~·. ·pu;,-1 ·::;·s 3"t{C·'-'-' -;1,:~~ 2:L[U 1,' SNli:3"o's'.:!1<3 13..::? 1S 8S086 ~c. 'J'IHS'o'/A ·Nc_N3::: i _3~~_:_5 H_-v8. ]S V'1C<'.'.L ~.J J !li::3d0c':d ilHONVS 1r.vMlf'~ 5 c Locsin, Ramon To: MARK W STIEFEL Cc: Owen Hille; 'Kulwant Sandhu'; Darcey Miller; Sloan, Jon Subject: RE: L02CG408 Sandhu Grading Restoration 05/12/03 Mark, Page I of2 I will extend the deadline till June 15, 2003 as requested. In order to have the permit approval and issuance with the restoration work completed before this years wet season, I will not be able to extend the deadline past June 15, 2003. Rarrion C. Locsin Site Development Specialist Site Development serv~ces Section Lanci Use Services Di'ln.sion c<i:ig Coi.:.:-ity DLJES ph: (206) 296-7151 fx: (206: 296 7055 -----Original Message----- From: MARK W STIEFEL [mailto:stiefel_eng@msn.com] Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 11:09 AM To: Locsin, Ramon Cc: Owen Hille; 'Kulwant Sandhu'; Darcey Miller Subject: Re: L02CG408 Sandhu Grading Restoration Ramon, I have received a request from the project team that you extend the resubmittal deadline to June 15th to accommodate some scheduling issues. Please let me know if this is acceptable. We appreciate your patience as we work through the final portion of this mitigation plan. Mark W. Stiefel, P.E. -----Original Message ----- From: Locsin, Ramon To: 'MARK W STIEFEL' Cc: Qw_e!l Hille ; 'Kulwant SancJhy' ; Q_a1_c:ru,_Miller Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 3:28 PM Subject: RE: L02CG408 Sandhu Grading Restoration 05/08/03 Mark, Your request for additional time to submit the information is granted till Friday, May 23, 2003. Let me know if this will not suffice. cl.amo:1 C. Locsin Sit.e Developirent Spe::.:ialist 05/12/2003 ' Page 2 of2 Site :Jeve:op:nen:: Service:s Section Lo.nd U:ac Services Di '.r::sion KJ.D(] Ccunty DDES pb, ;206) 296 7151 fx, (2C6) 296-7055 05/12/2003 -----Original Message----- From: MARK W STIEFEL [mailto:stiefel_eng@msn.com] Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 1:41 PM To: 'Locsin, Ramon' Cc: Owen Hille; 'Kulwant Sandhu'; Darcey Miller Subject: L02CG408 Sandhu Grading Restoration Ramon: I left a voice mail for you today regarding the project submittal date, which is listed as May 13, 2003 in your March 5, 2003 letter. The surveyor has completed their field topographic mapping, including locating the onsite culvert identified during our site visit with you, B-Twelve, the applicant and myself. The surveyor has been trying to forward their CADD file in a format compatible with my CADD system. Unfortunately, we have been experiencing technical difficulty in getting the information transferred so I am able to complete the engineering plans for the restoration work. We then need to coordinate the plans with the B-Twelve restoration documentation as part of the submittal package. I am requesting that your office grant some additional time to allow for unforeseen technical problems. We want to respond to your needs with an accurate and complete mitigation plan. Please respond as soon as possible with your decision. Thank you. Mark W. Stiefel, P.E. (253) 854-7472 Project Engineer Tuesday, Jul 15, 2003 03 23 PM King County -ODES ' MARK W. STIEFEL, P.E. c}< CONSULTING• CIVIL ENGINEERING• PLANNING • PROJECT MANAGEMENT• WETLAND PERMITTING June 25, 2003 Ms. Darcy Miller B-Twelve Associates, Inc. L~"'°8 RECEIVED SITE DEVELOPMENT 1103 W Meeker Street, Suite C Kent, WA 98032 JUN 2 1 • , KING CO. D.D.E.S. REVISION Tel (253)-852-2760 Subject: Dear Darcy: Sandhu Grading Restoration Project (L02CG408) Transmittal of Engineering Mitigation Plans & Estimate Transmitted herein for your information and inclusion in a formal submittal to King County Department of Design and Environmental Services (DDES) are the following documents. This information is provided at the owner's request to satisfy DDES grading violation notice requirements. I understand you will provide the wetland and buffer mitigation planting plans and related estimates for use by the County in determining any bonding requirement amounts. • Three copies of Civil Engineering Plans & Specifications C-1 through C-5 • Three copies of Topographic Survey prepared by Cramer NW, Inc. • Three copies of Engineer's Estimate for grading mitigation work for bond amounts Transmitted under separate cover are additional copies of the documentation for the Owner, the Surveyor, and your office files. Should you or DDES require additional information, please contact me at (253) 854-7472. Sincerely, /7 /. / ~-. ,:[ ,;· / ,; . (.{~ef;/ _: . -~ / . .,. . Mark W. Stiefel, P.E. • Project Civil Engineer Enclosures: Cc: Kulwant Sandhu-Owner (2 copies of submittal documents) Darcy Miller -B-Twelve ( I copy of submittal documents) Cramer NW, Inc. (I copy of submittal documents) MWS/mws C:\winword\22& Sandhu\Transmittal letter to B-Tv.:clve.doc 22312 113th AVE. S.E. KENT, WASHINGTON 98031-2651 TEL: /253) 854-7472 CELL: /206) 300-5853 FAX: (253) 854-1575 EMAIL: stiefel_eng@msn.com ,r.0n0 V'l ~-!.C:.:0-~ z I·, .. .. ,.,. ·:r; .. . 4~!' '1f· .._ •,,,~I ~ I I ! C-I ~IT_~ Sr,~[T_ INDEX. ~ EXISTING CO.\'~, TIONS SUfl\Jt" _AND-1.J . ..,,£YLAI\D M -,c ... -10N ;UL WAN f SAN'.::l"U ~RO:~'?TY 5 ·~.-,44 SE 1541-1 s-:-REE, _ ~._E';,_ -JN WASI---ING-ON 980::,8 STIU[l [N\.l'i'.:ER!NG 2:3'2 1'3TH AV['ll.JE SE KENT, WA 98C31-2E5' y,. '.753;-P.54-7£.72 FM'.: {253)-85L-:575 .. 'I z C C-2 t,h f ~ f "\ ,n ~ I r :" ! i __ @-~ - " ii ( 1 2044 SE , 84 "/CJPER-y "<ENl:)N \'>AS Tt< ST',>EC:T . H NC:"'ON 93058 ,t ' ,•. 8 (253)-854-"575 C ' ,Jl l l I ·--- SA',OHL 'Wt_ -LAl\0 MITIGA "';"ION KUL\\iA~T SloN)HlJ PRQ:>[~-y 12044 SE 18'-TH 5-~EET RENTON, WASHll\::;TON 98-'.)58 ST1ffi:L [l>JGl"i[ER,NG 223'.2 i"3TH AVENUE SC KTNT. WA 9803i-2651 :TL '._253)-854-7472 FAX -1 -.-1------.., ; •7r~Gi0'"2J § : " "' i "' f ?, ' 5 (253)-854-1 :_.75 + " ' ' , , I ' ' '' , :~ '' ~,;: :;: ;!'s .f~ ' 2 0 SANDt-U W:CT~AND Ml~IGAnON KVLWANT SAN8-IL; =<sOP:C'sTY ~ 12044 SE 184T-s-C?c:c:r REr-.. TON. WASHtNGl0:-.1 '.l8058 ~-- Slli:FEL i:l\'C,NE::~ING 22312 "13T!-o AV:CNUE S.~ KENT, N1' 98031-2651 ' ; TEL· \253)-8::L-702 FAX· ·:253)-854<575 ' ' i ' i ' . j ' "' f 1,g!;~! ~~ ;;;;~o;::;~~ ,.; ;;~~]i: ~;;?~I! 5~ ~ '" ~:; p ::-5 GENERA_ r-.on:s A'<J S?ECIFICATlONS SANDr1:..1 WETLAND Ml°'IGATIO/\ { KULWANT SANDHU P'sOPERTY 1 120q S( · 8~ TH STPEC 'iEN-DN. WA':'.f-''S.:G ;0:J 98:)58 I I ~;·1;:\ 1E;~~--!~;~NJGE s E. '\ENT, WA 980.31-2651 TEL: '.253)-85~-7472 (25.3)-854-;575 ( ! Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet King County Department of Development & Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southweat Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Pro)ect Name: ; :5;::4,y0J".i:L> A#~f:;;zA~-'1 Date: Location: /"./:~c:;,,7".£--5(.?: //y77../ S/ SIERRA Pro)ect No.: 45>::r-rd:? Le?-C'C?yo,(1 ) ~/9(/';;""?,_;,V I /A/ A Cleatlng greater than or equal to 5000 board feet of timber? ______ yes If yes, ~ no Forest Practice Permit Number:. ______ _ (RCW 76.09) Page 1 of 9 S:PUBLIC\LUSD\LUISIREF8D SITE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET SIERRA Activity No.: Note: All prices Include labor, equipment, materials, overhead and profit. Prices are from RS Means data adjusted for the Seattle area or from local sources If not Included In the RS Means database. Unit prices updated 12/97 Revision date: 8/22/98 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Excavation-bulk F~""", silt NGPE Water truck, dust control ed SWDM 6.4.6.3 WSDOT 9-03.9(3 swg_M 5.4. 3. 1 SWDM 6.4.2.4 SWDM 5.4.2.2 SWDM 5.4.2.1 SWDM 6.4.2.1 SWDM 6.4.2.3 WSDOT 9-13.1(2 SWDM 5.4.4.1 SWDM 5.4.4.1 SWDM 5.4.5.2 SWDM 5.4.5.1 SWDM 6.4.5.1 SWDM 5.4.2.4 SWDM 5.4.2.5 SWDM 5.4.2.5 $ $ 5B.70 Each $ 74.30 CY $ 7.03 CY I ,<7 c_; $ 1.30 CY $ 1.20 LF I /'-.?-"-' $ 1.20 LF $ 0.51 SY l N 7')'? C I / I ZU-?:? c, $ 1.26 SY $ 1.75 SY $ 0.46 SY $ 9.30 LF $ 14.00 LF $ 18.00 LF l ~rs l / l -;T_-c7 O $ 2.00 SY $ 33.98 CY $ 1.273.34 Each $ 2,548.68 Each $ 1,695.11 Each $ 15.57 LF $ 59.60 LF $ 0.44 SY $ 5.24 SY $ 6.48 SY $ 66.00 HR $ 85.00 HR ' !lZ:!Ji~~~@J@\f t4iJt1~HWmr·· 1we@eu11Ms rffM\M~tJW!WJm #~iJJ#~1 Each ESC SUBTOTAL: COLUMN: Page 2 ot 9 S:PUBl IC\LUSD\LUISIREFBD SITE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET $ 'Z:C.~~ Unit prices updated 12/97 Revision date: 8/22/98 ) Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet CY 0.31 SY 7.718.40 Acre $ 1.30 CY s 3.53 CY $ 18.13 LF $ 11.68 LF $ 1.105.82 Each $ 10.64 LF $ 19.83 CY $ 22.16 CY $ 32.91 CY $ 47.23 SY $ 85.09 SY $ 116.20 SY $ 1.76 SY $ O.B3 SY $ 117.60 Each $ 2.60 Each $ 8.49 SY $ 686.44 Da• $ 1 363.60 Acre $ 74.07 HR $ a.ea SY $ 7.24 SY $ 7.12 SY concrete I $ 38.40 SF $ 8.25 SF Page3of9 SUBTOTAL -r 'KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. S:PU8LICILUSO\LUIS1REFBD SITE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET 0 C <".7/ /J[..~zY:Z ) Unit prices updated 12/97 Revision da1e: 8/22/98 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet . .&'iL·. ·t11:*11 $ 20.00 $ 5.00 SY $ 1.20 SY $ 35.77 SY $ 2B.11 LF $ 38.17 LF $ 11.64 LF :::urt & Gutter, vertical Is 8.43 LF :urb and Clutter. demolition and dl1-1al I$ 11.81 LF $ 2.12 LF $ 2.23 LF $ 1.81 LF $ 1.47 LF $ 0.86 LF Shoulder, AC, ( ooo AC road unit orloa ) $ . SY Shoulder, aravel, 4• th/el< s 8.55 SY Sidewalk, 4" lhlck s 28.54 SY Sldawalk, 4' thick demollllon and dlsnnaal $ 24.11 SY Sidewalk. s· thlel< $ 30,38 SY $ 30,13 SY $ 74,18 Each $ 6.08 Each $ 2.07 SF $ 0.22 LF Pago4ol9 SUBTOTAL 'KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. S:PUBLIC\LUSDILUISIREF8D SITE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET « d r-l I Unit prices updated 12/97 Revision date: 8/22/98 ) Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet $ AC Overlov, 1.5" AC $ 8.43 SY AC OV&rlov, 2' AC $ 7.81 SY AC Road, 2", 4' roel<, Flrot2600 SY $. 14.99 SY AC Road, 2", 4' rock, Qtv. ovor 2600SY $ 11.62 SY ·AC Road, 3', 4' rock, First 2600 SY $ 17.12 SY IAC Road, 3', 4' roel<, Qtv, over 2600 SY $ 13.75 SY !AC Rood, 6', First 2500 SY $ 12.87 SY AC Road, 6', Qtv. Over 2500 SY $ 12.12 SY AC Road 6', Flre12500 SY $ 14.67 SY AC Road, e·. Qtv. Over 2600 SY $ 14.02 BY Asoholl Trootad Bosa, 4' thick $ 8.01 SY Gravel Road, 4" roel<, First 2500 SY $ 9.92 SY Gravel Rood 4" roel<, Qtv, ovor 2600 SY $ 8.65 SY PCC Road, s· no base, ov• 2500 SY $ 18.70 SY PCC Road, e•, no base, ovar2500 SY $ 19.02 SY Thickened Edao s 5,99 LF Page 5 or 9 SUBTOTAL "KCC 27 A authorizes only ona bond reduc11on. S:PUBLIC1LUSD\LUIS\REF8D SITE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET [/ r-I '\ Unit prlcas updatad 12/97 Revision date: 8/22/98 • • Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Bollards a fixed I$ 209.34 I Each Bollards· removable I $ 393.34 I Each ' ICBs lnelude frame and lldl $ 1,093.60 Each $ 1,248.60 Each $ 1,788.32 Each $ 379.68 FT $ 1,908.66 Each $ 423.07 FT $ 2,044.80 Each $ 468.66 FT $ 2,793.80 Each $ 801.92 FT Thro•~•-curb Inlet Framework/Add) $ 318.34 Each CIHnout, PVC 4' $ 113.62 Each Cleanout, PVC, e· $ 162.09 Each Cleanout, PVC, 8' $ 194.96 Each Culvert, PVC, 4• $ 7.61 LF Culvert, PVC, 6' $ 10,98 LF Culvarl, PVC, 8' $ 11.69 LF Culvorl, PVC, 12' $ 18.93 LF Culvarl, CMP, 6' $ 16.00 LF Culvert, CMP, 12' $ 23.00 LF Culvert, CMP, 16' $ 28.46 LF Culvert, CMP, 18' $ 32.82 LF Culvert, CMP, 24' $ 48.37 LF Culvort, CMP, 30' $ 62.13 LF Culvert, CMP, 38' $ 97.49 LF Culvorl, CMP, 48' $ 122.46 LF Culverl, CMP, 60' $ 204.74 LF Culverl, CMP, 72' $ 253.11 LF Pago6ol9 SUBTOTAL ci.· 'KCC 27 A authorizes only one bond reduction. ( S:PUBLICILUSD\LUISIREF8D SITE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET ) ) Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet -,fi&ifi Culvert, concrete, 8' $ 18.28 LF Culvert, concrota, 12' • 28,13 LF Culvert, concrete. 15" $ 32.47 LF Culvert, Concrete 18" $ 38,70 LF Culvert, COncrota, 24' $ 53,10 LF Culvert. Concreta 30' $ 90,69 LF Culvert, Concrete, 38' $ 119.88 LF Culvert Concrete, 42 1 $ 137.78 LF Cutvart, Concrete 48" $ 162,98 LF Culvert, OPP, 6' $ 9.30 LF Culvert, OPP, 8' $ 14.00 LF Culvert OPP. 12' $ 18.00 LF I Culvert OPP, 16' $ 20.00 LF lcutvert, OPP, 18' $ 24,00 LF 'Culvert, OPP 24' $ 32.00 LF $ 42.00 LF $ 48.00 LF $ 7,03 CY s 22.80 LF $ 19,65 LF $ 2,09 SY $ 85.00 HR $ 1.398,00 Each $ 12,18 SY $ 908.88 Each s 962.88 Each $ 998.88 Each $ 33.98 CY $ 870,00 Each ITraah Rack, 12' s 184.32 Each Trash Rack, 16' $ 208.32 Each 'Trash Rack, 18 • $ 233.82 Each ,Trash Rack, 21' $ 288.82 Each Page 7 of 9 SUBTOTAL ,;t a ·Kee 27 A authorize$ only one bond reduc11on. S:PUBL!e\LUSD\LUIS\REF8D SITE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET \ c22· / Unit price:, updated, 12/97 Revision date: 8/22/98 • Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet 2· AC 1 2· ton course rock & 4" borrow $ 13.77 SY 2' AC, 1.5' loD course & 2.5' base oourse $ 14.99 SY 4" select borrow $ 3.96 SY 1.6" top course rock & 2.6' base course $ 9,92 SY EA. EA. SUBTOTAL ~ ~ SUBTOTAL (SUM All PAGES): y: ~ / ~-;J . 7 ';C-.:;- 30% CONTINGENCY & MOBILIZATION: ; --;;; .c<:"' GRANDTOTAL: 0 ~ /'/~,<~'?,( COLUMN: /B C / D E Page 8 ol 9 'KCC 27 A authorizes only one bond reduction, S:PUBLICILUSD\LUIS\REFBD SITE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET Unit prices updated 12/97 Revision date: 8122/98 ) • Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Original bond computations prepared by: 7 r:X46'K h;/. , :?Z<~cL ,/7~-Name: Date: £-.;,·/...:? 9' /q 3 ? PE Registration Number: --.-~2....:a=:.....::d......:,.--.,_Z,...,_,8==:::.,,:..__,..,....,..""=-"--,.-,,,~,,..,,--~--- Flrm Name: ~ ::i?"~? &74?a/,::5<'.?vtV<S,: TeJ. #: /4-""2 -.:>/ k/-;_J 7 --c:·· ' Address: PZ-3/2 // 3 7'r'-A-Ve --,ie: <·<r-<:<Z WA zec:--s/ Steblllzatlon/Eroslcn Sediment Control (ESC) Existing Right-cl-Way Improvements Fulure Public Road Improvements & Drainage Faolllllee Private Improvements (A+B+C+D) =TOTAL (T) PERFORMANCE BOND AMOUNT Column (A) (8) (C) (D) PERFORMANCE BOND' AMOUNT $ . ~;'k> $ ) d . ' $ . ~ $ . .:::z;.6;:7 = $ . :?"3 t..:t:--7 i Minimum bond amount Is $1000. SITE RESTORATION BONDI (A) $ • t;:?--::7? (First $7,500 of bond shaU be cash.) RIGHT-OF-WAY BONDI (8) $ . (cf__,/ " TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY & SITE RESTORATION BOND"I (A+B) $ ·;;:J: ~.;-t:, (Flrst$7,500 of bond shall be cash.) 1 PERFORMANCE BOND TOTAL AFTER BONDI (T·E) --------- REDUCTION'" NAME OF PERSON PREPARING BOND REDUCTION: PUBLIC ROAD IMPROVEMENTS & DRAINAGE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE/DEFECT BOND' AMOUNT (B+C)X0.25= $ ~ I Date: • ------------ 1-NOTE: The word ~bond" Is used to represent any flnanclal guarantee acceptable to King County. 0 NOTE: KCC 27 A auUiorlzes bonds to be combined when both are required . .... NOTE: Per KCC 27 A, totel bond amounts remaining after reduction shell not be less lhan 30%, of the original amount Page 9 of 9 S:PUBLIC\LUSD\LUIS\REF8D SITE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET Unit price!) updated 12/97 Revision date: 8/22/98 Monday, Dec 02. 2002 10:25 AM King County -ODES \ -B-twelve Associates, Inc. 1103W. Meeker St. Kent, WA 98032-5751 (v) 253-859-0515 (fl 253-852-4 732 (e) info@b12assoc.com June 26, 2003 Mr. Ramon Locsin King County D.D.E.S. 900 Oakesdale Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 ~'!<>8 SITE DEVELOPMENT JUN 2 7 2003 KING CO. D.D.E.S. RECEIVED SITE DEVELOPMENT JUN ·1 ' •. KING CO. D.D.E.S. Re: Mitigation Plan Sandhu Property; No. L02CG408; Job #A2-125 REVIS\ON Dear Ramon, This letter responds to the County's letter to Mr. Sandhu, dated January 13, 2003. A site meeting was also held on March 19, 2003, to further discuss the impacts and mitigation associated with the grading violation on the site. Attached please find the following: 1. B-twelve's Wetland & Buffer Mitigation Plan (Sheet W-1) 2. B-twelve's Wetland & Buffer Mitigation Plan Notes. After the Plan is approved by the County, these Notes will be placed on a plan sheet (24 x 36") and labeled Sheet W-2. 3. Sensitive Areas Bond Quantity Worksheet for planting, inspection, and monitoring costs. 4. Cover letter, Civil Engineering Plans and Specifications, and bond quantity worksheet, by Stiefel Engineering. The areas which appear to have been graded are shown on Sheet W-1, and in greater detail on the Engineering Plans (Sheet C.2). According to Stiefel Engineering, approximately 15,453 sf of buffer area was disturbed, including the dirt piles to the east and west of the channel in Wetland A/B/C. As agreed in the site meeting and in the subsequent emails, the following actions will be considered mitigation for the grading violation within sensitive areas. • Temporary erosion and sediment control measures will be put in place prior to the start of any grading work. • The dirt piles, including those located on each side of the wetland channel, will be regraded, and the areas restored to what was approximately pre- existing grade. • All graded or disturbed areas in the buffers and restored wetlands will be seeded with a native grass seed mix. Re: Mitigation Plan Sandhu/No. L02CG408/Job #AZ-125 B-twclve Associates June 26, 2003 Page 2 of2 • Native shrubs and grasses will be planted on both sides of the wetland channel. • All debris will be removed from wetland buffers, specifically in the buffer that is south of wetland flags Al-A8. • A wildlife-passable, split-rail fence with sensitive areas signs will be installed along the wetland buffers. According to the engineer, the area outside of sensitive areas that was disturbed by grading activity is approximately 27,425 sf. (See Civil Engineering Plans.) The limits of general cleanup, regrading, and erosion control work are shown on the Engineering plans. We believe that these mitigation measures will restore the site to its preexisting condition, and will make up for the temporary impacts that the disturbance may have had on the sensitive areas, The planted areas will help to filter runoff and provide wildlife habitat, and will also stabilize the area near the wetland channel, thus decreasing erosion. Please feel free to call or email me (darcey@bl2assoc.com) if you have any questions or need any additional information. Sincerely, B~,8.~ Darcey B. Miller Wetland Ecologist CC: Kulwant Sandhu Mark Stiefel, P.E. F,le: dm/A2125-Sandhu/A2125-KC-6-03.doc June 26, 2003 Mr. Ramon Locsin King County D.D.E.S. 900 Oakesdale Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 Re: Mitigation Plan Sandhu Property; No. L02CG408; Job #A2-125 Dear Ramon, 8-twelve Associates, Inc. 1103 W. Meeker St. Kent. WA 98032-5751 (v) 253-859-0515 (t) 253-852-4 732 (e) info@b12assoc.com Loze&llce RECEIVED SITE DEVELOPMENT JUN 2 7 2CD3 KING CO. D.D.E.S. REVISION This letter responds to the County's letter to Mr. Sandhu, dated January 13, 2003. A site meeting was also held on March 19, 2003, to further discuss the impacts and mitigation associated with the grading violation on the site. Attached please find the following: 1. B-twelve's Wetland & Buffer Mitigation Plan (Sheet W-1) 2. B-twelve's Wetland & Buffer Mitigation Plan Notes. After the Plan is approved by the County, these Notes will be placed on a plan sheet (24 x 36") and labeled Sheet W-2. 3. Sensitive Areas Bond Quantity Worksheet for planting, inspection, and monitoring costs. 4. Cover letter, Civil Engineering Plans and Specifications, and bond quantity worksheet, by Stiefel Engineering. The areas which appear to have been graded are shown on Sheet W-1, and in greater detail on the Engineering Plans (Sheet C.2). According to Stiefel Engineering, approximately 15,453 sf of buffer area was disturbed, including the dirt piles to the east and west of the channel in Wetland NB/C. As agreed in the site meeting and in the subsequent emails, the following actions will be considered mitigation for the grading violation within sensitive areas. • Temporary erosion and sediment control measures will be put in place prior to the start of any grading work. • The dirt piles, including those located on each side of the wetland channel, will be regraded, and the areas restored to what was approximately pre- existing grade. • All graded or disturbed areas in the buffers and restored wetlands will be seeded with a native grass seed mix. BY L,,~ (j(}"ll,,,,- '\CSPJS A.REA REVIFW DAn~/-~~- .. Re: Mitigation Plan Sandhu/No. L02CG408/Job #A2-125 B-twelve Associates June 26, 2003 Page 2 of2 • Native shrubs and grasses will be planted on both sides of the wetland channel. • All debris will be removed from wetland buffers, specifically in the buffer that is south of wetland flags Al-A8. • A wildlife-passable, split-rail fence with sensitive areas signs will be installed along the wetland buffers. According to the engineer, the area outside of sensitive areas that was disturbed by grading activity is approximately 27,425 sf. (See Civil Engineering Plans.) The limits of general cleanup, regrading, and erosion control work are shown on the Engineering plans. We believe that these mitigation measures will restore the site to its preexisting condition, and will make up for the temporary impacts that the disturbance may have had on the sensitive areas. The planted areas will help to filter runoff and provide wildlife habitat, and will also stabilize the area near the wetland channel, thus decreasing erosion. Please feel free to call or email me (darcey@bl2assoc.com) if you have any questions or need any additional information. Sincerely, "~8~ Darcey B. Miller Wetland Ecologist CC: Kulwant Sandhu Mark Stiefel, P.E. File: dm/ A2125-Sandhul A2125-KC-6-03 .doc King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW, Renton, WA 98055-1219 Date:_6/26/03, _____ _ Bond Quantity Worksheet for Sensitive Area Mitigations Project Name:_Sandhu, _______________________ _ Project Number:_K.C. No. L02CG408 B-twelve #A2-125. ______________________ _ Location:_ 12044 SE 184th St, Parcel #6199600320, _________________________ _ Contact Name: _B-twelve Associates, Darcey Miller, _________________________ _ Address:_ 1103 West Meeker Street, Kent, WA. ___________________________ _ TREES (INCLUDES DELIVERY, INSTALLATION, & MATERIALS Scientific Name Common Name Qty I Unit Price 1.\l_al Qty !Unit Price 1 gallon Total 2 gallon Abies grandis.. !grand fir A~r macrophyJlum lbig leaf maple $13.54 J -$OJ)(). A/nus rubra red alder $13.22 nm:,, $11,ooJ Arbutus menziesii Pacific madrone $14.50 ,,,T,< .$!).Qi):, Betufa papyrifera !paper birch I I $13.22 Fraxinus fatifofia !Oregon ash I J $13.22 l'ri!§IJI:i$i)J)();I J $23.51 Picea sitchensis.. Sitka spruce $13.54 $24.15 Pinus contorta• Shore pine $13.54 $24.15 Pinus monticola" Western white pine $13.54 $24.15 f:opul'!_s tremuloides quaking aspen $24.15 Populus trichocarpa black cottonwood $13.54 $23.51 Prunus emarginata bitter cherry $13.54 ~uedotsuga menziesii* Douglas fir $13.54 $23.51 Taxus brevifofia' (Pacific yew I I I ,,:;$0.QQ,: Thuja plicata • western red cedar $13.54 \;;~ Tsuga heterophlla.. western hemlock $13.54 ~~'$0.00'i Total $23.51 $23.82 Total 2.\l_al Total Alt plant prices are from Fourth Corner Nurseries, Sound Native Plants, Storm Lake Growers, and Wabash Natives (containers); and Abundant Life and Frosty Hollow (seeds). QtylUnlt Price 5 .\l_•I 5 gallon Total Total: ,s$Q.oo s@o· $44.74 J.6 !'$0:Qb, ""z:)$Qfo. $44.74 !iirWill<i.oo $44.74 {:'0:$6:oa Qty (Total Cost Contact: 8-twelve Associates, 1103 W. Meeker St., Kent, WA 98032 (253) 859-0515 Document revised Aug. 8, 1998 Page 1 of 4 SHRUBS (INCLUDES DELIVERY, INSTALLATION, & MATERIALS1 Scientific Name Common Name Qty Unit Price 1.9.allon Qty !Unit Price 12 gallon Qty !Unit Price 15 gallon !Qty 1 gallon Total -~_JJallon !Total 5 gallon Acer Circinatum vine maple $13.54 1::·: .. :; _$0.00 $23.51 -. $0.00' Amelanchier alnifolia serviceberry $13.54 ''i,$0.00 $23.82 . , ._,$0.00; Berberis aquitolium tall Oregon grape -' $0.00 $24.15 ·. ,,i,1;$0.00 · .. $0.00 Berberis nervosa short Oregon grape $13.86 ,,,,,,$0.00, I -' -·:i!if$()~t)() ' :IO;oo Comus stolonifera red-osier dogwood $13.22 :,;.~$0:00' $23.51 -.. , __ "!'J&o.oa . 10:06 Coryfus cornuta hazelnut $13.54 I ---,· .: ·'.:. $6~00 $23.51 <"!I$o:oo $0.00 Crataegus douglasii black hawthorn $13.22 I ., ; ',.;$6.oo) $23.51 1::,--·;'::.: ::$6.oo ,,$0.00 Gaultheria shallon salal $13.86 ' $0.00 .,$0.00, $0.00 Holodiscus discolor ocean spray 19 $13.54 \".$257.26 $23.51 I" $6:oo .. $0.00 ,, Lonicera involucrata black twtnberry $13.54 •itlH&l$0~00 $22.87 1, • $0.00 .fu', $0.00 Myrica gale sweetgale -lTf$0'.oo i,, ,,,. $0.00 2 $0.00 Oplopanax horridus Devil's club $13.86 $6.0o $24.15 IT' $0.00 $0.QO Philadephus lewisii mock orange $13.54 I . $0.0Q $22.87 ')[ . $0.il() 1,;, '$0.00 Physocarpus capitatus Pacific ninebark 18 $13.22 $~~7,~8 $23.51 I""'' .-. $0'.00 · '"'i::$0.00 Prunus virginiana choke cherry ' ' f"$b'.il() . .$0.00 '$0.00 Pyrus tusca western crabapple $13.22 -~--"" : _$0.9() $23.51 I ' ;. ;; '$0'il() )'.-$0.00 Rhamnus purshiana cascara $13.22 :.·o:::<iil:$0:oo: $23.51 ,,,·,.· $0'.00 i's' .. $0.00 Rhododendron macrophulfum Pacific rhododendron $14.19 [(·-'$0.00 ' '!ii ,$0:00 ., ·.· '$0.00 Ribes bracteosum stink currant $13.22 '" .·.· .$0'.!lO ~,$0.00' ,. ';,.$0.00 Ribes lacustre prickly currant $13.86 ., "'$0:oo' -~~. ,.,,''$'0.00 Ribes sanguineum red.flowering currant $13.86 ,,,. ' . $0.00 ; ,:$0.00 Rosa nutkana Nootka rose 12 $13.54 \<i:$1~2'."4i\ $23.51 ·'k;';,,$0.00, •:50:00 Rosa pisocarpa clustered rose $13.54 '1""0$0.00 $22.87 Rubus leucodermis black raspberry lt,$0.0Q Rubus parviflorus thimbleberry 18 $13.54 ,,·,s,243_7,2 • ';'"$0.00 ~- Rubus spectabilis salmon berry $13.22 $23.51 . :,,:$0.00 . Salix geyeriana Geyer willow $13.22 i:,$(),00, $22.87 $0.00 SaJ;x hookeriana Hooker's willow $12.91 •·•.$0.00 $22.87 ' .$().00 Salix lasiandra Pacific willow $13.22 $0.00 $22.87 ,,.,' . '$0.00 Salix scouleriana Scouter willow ;c:· .. $22.87 ,, .. ' ' $0.00 Salix sitchensis Sitka willow $13.22 .$0.00 $22.87 I "'C'' $b:oo Sambucus racemosa red elderberry $13.54 . $0.oo $23.51 Sorbus sitchensis Cascade mountain ash Symphoricarpos a/bus snowberry s13_22 I . $0.oo I I $23.51 Vaccinium ovatum evergreen huckleberry $13.86 Vaccinium parvifolium red huckleberry $15.47 Contact: B·twelve Associates, 1103 W. Meeker St., Kent, WA Page 2 of 4 INSTALLATION COSTS (LABOR, EQUIPMENT, OVERHEAD & PROF1n I Scientific Name I Unit Price Unit I !Amount lcompost, vegetable, delivered and spread $37.88 CY Decompacting tilVhardpan, medium, to 6" depth $1.57 CY Decompacting till/hardpan, medium, to 12" depth $1.57 CY Fertilize, slow release tablets, 30gm/tree $3.21 E.ach Hydroseeding $0.51 SY PLANTS: Slips (willow, red-osier) $1.32 Each PLANTS: Stakes (willow) $0.96 Each Top~oil -delivered & Sp_~~ad $35.73 ex Subtotal GRASSES/EMERGENTS(INCLUDES DELIVERY, INSTALLATION, & MATERIALS1 Sq.ft. Wetland Seed Mix 3lb/1000 sq.ff. 0 $75.95 lb. 1000 Buffer Seed Mix 31b/1 ooo sq.ff. 0 $50.68 lb. 1000 Qnty I Unit Price I Unit Emergent Sedge, rus~ & grass $1.32 4"pot Subtotal HABITAT STRUCTURES (INCLUDES DELIVERY, INSTALLATION, & MATERIALS} Specific Name Unit Cost Unit Fascines (willow) Each Woody debris, large $163.00 JEach Snags $400.QO JEach Subtotal Contact: B-twefve Associates, 1103 W. Meeker St., Kent, WA 98032 (253) 859-0515 Page 3 of 4 GENERAL ITEMS (INCLUDES DELIVERY, INSTALLATION, & MATERIALS) Specific Name Unit Cost Units • Fencing, chain link, 6' high $1M9 LF . *Fencing, split rail, 3' high (2-rail) $)0.54 LF Fencing, Temporary (NGPE) $1.20 LF. Signs, Sensitive Area Boundary 8 . $8.00 Ea~h Fish Stream Sign Irrigation, Temporary $ 2,000.00 Acre Subtotal $64.00 OTHER COSTS-THROUGHOUT MONITORING PERIOD Item Unitl Cost Unit Total Cost Inspection, annual 2 . -$460.:0b Each Inspection, final 1 $575.00 Each Maintenance, semi-annual . $0.00 Each . ' Maintenance, annual · $0.00 Each . Monitoring annual 3 $1,000.00 Each I Subtotal 4,495.00 Total Construction Amount $11,822.26 Total Bond Amount Agency Multiplier $14,n7.83 Aoencv Note: All Grading expenses and fencing (permanent and erosion) are included in the grading bond for the entire project site. I I Contact: B-twelve Associates, 1103 W. Meeker St., Kent, WA 98032 (253) 859-0515 Page 4 of 4 .. REVISED MEETING MINUTES SANDHU MITIGATION PROJECT I. A meeting was held on March 18, 2003 at 10:00 AM on the project site. 2. In Attendance: Kulwant Sandhu, Property Owner/Applicant Darcey Miller, B-Twelve Wetland Ecologist Jon Sloan, DOES Wetland Ecologist Ramon Locsin, DOES Site Development Specialist Mark Stiefel, Project Engineer 3. The purpose of the meeting was to reach resolution on the following project areas: • Status of wetland delineation flagging and mapping • Verify limits of wetland and buffer impact due to unauthorized fill activities • Required mitigation measures acceptable to ODES • Submittal requirements and permit process 4. Darcey showed the locations of additional wetland flags placed and surveyed to Jon for verification of boundaries. Jon confirmed the locations. The updated plans will reflect the most current wetland delineation. 5. Jon and Ramon showed photographs of the disturbed areas of the wetlands and buffers. Ramon will provide a copy of the photos to Darcey and Mark for use in preparing the mitigation plans. 6. The mitigation plans will include a limited grading and temporary erosion control plan prepared by Mark. Darcey will prepare the planting mitigation plan and bond quantity worksheet for the work, including grading. 7. Jon said that the buffer mitigation work near the northwest comer of the disturbed area should include regrading, removal, and disposal of garbage/debris. This would satisfy his requirement for compensatory mitigation. 8. The mitigation area near the easterly portion of the disturbed area (culverts) needs to include regrading, stabilization, and planting. 9. Ramon and Jon stated that the mitigation plans should be submitted separately from any preliminary plat grading plan application. This would allow them to review and approve the plans quickly and enable the property owner to complete the mitigation work this spring. 10. The preliminary plat application may be submitted before the mitigation work is completed. However, the mitigation plans would need to be approved before the County would act on the preliminary plat application. Sandhu Mitigation Meeting Notes March 18, 2003 .. Meeting Notes Page 2 11. A culvert was observed near the south end of the disturbed area, which apparently conveys most of the surface runoff to the street. The topographic mapping and plans need to include the culvert information. Sandhu Mitigation Meeting Notes March 18, 2003 Mark - Just a few comments in response to your meeting notes: 1. Regrading the northwest wetland buffer should only entail that necessary to smooth out the berm/ fill associated with the gravel roadway. Regrading should be limited to that necessary to restore (approximately) the preexisting grade. 2. Any/ all graded areas must at a minimum be reseeded with an approved native seed mix. 3. Regraded areas in the vicinity of the culvert will require replanting in accordance with King County Mitigation Guidelines (2001) with the exception that trees are not required. 4. Temporary erosion and sediment control measures will need be included in accordance with Appendix D of the KC Surface Water Design Manual. Please note that these comments are provided in response to your meeting notes. They do not necessarily supplant or change other requirements / issues that may have been highlighted by Ramon or myself in the Department's February letter to your client. However, some of the points raised in that letter may in fact be substantively changed by agreements we made in the field -your revised submittal should make note of any of these changes. Thanks, Jon H. Sloan Envir0t1mentn.l Scientist 1/1 King County DOES/ LUSD -Critical Areas 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 phone: (206) 296-7158 Jax.· (206) 296-7055 ('IJWif: ..J.t2_n.~k)an(d'l1lCLri\kC.:J(',V These notes reflect the additions and corrections provided by Darcey and Jon. Respectfully submitted by Mark W. Stiefel, P.E. Distribution List: Kulwant Sandhu, Property Owner/Applicant Darcey Miller, 8-Twelve Wetland Ecologist Jon Sloan, ODES Wetland Ecologist Ramon Locsin, ODES Site Development Specialist Jon Rutledge, Cramer Northwest (Surveyor) Mark Stiefel, Project Engineer Project File Sandhu Mitigation Meeting Noles March 18, 2003 MEETING MINUTES SANDHU MITIGATION PROJECT 1. A meeting was held on March 18, 2003 at 10:00 AM on the project site. 2. In Attendance: Kulwant Sandhu, Property Owner/Applicant Darcy Miller, B-Twelve Wetland Ecologist John Sloan, DDES Wetland Ecologist Ramon Locsin, DDES Site Development Specialist Mark Stiefel, Project Engineer 3. The purpose of the meeting was to reach resolution on the following project areas: • Status of wetland delineation flagging and mapping • Verify limits of wetland and buffer impact due to unauthorized fill activities • Required mitigation measures acceptable to DDES • Submittal requirements and permit process 4. Darcy showed the locations of additional wetland flags placed and surveyed to John for verification of boundaries. John confirmed the locations. The updated plans will reflect the most current wetland delineation. 5. John and Ramon showed photographs of the disturbed areas of the wetlands and buffers. Ramon will provide a copy of the photos to Darcy and Mark for use in preparing the mitigation plans. 6. The mitigation plans will include a limited grading and temporary erosion control plan prepared by Mark. Darcy will prepare the planting mitigation plan and cost estimate for the work, including grading. 7. John said that the buffer mitigation work near the northwest comer of the disturbed area should include regarding, removal, and disposal of garbage/debris. This would satisfy his requirement for compensatory mitigation. 8. The mitigation area near the easterly portion of the disturbed area (culverts) needs to include regarding, stabilization, and planting. 9. Ramon and John stated that the mitigation plans should be submitted separately from any preliminary plat grading plan application. This would allow them to review and approve the plans quickly and enable the property owner to complete the mitigation work this spring. 10. The preliminary plat application may be submitted before the mitigation work is completed. However, the mitigation plans would need to be approved before the County would act on the preliminary plat application. Sandhu Mitigation Meeting Notes March 18, 2003 Meeting Notes Page 2 11. A culvert was observed near the south end of the disturbed area, which apparently conveys most of the surface runoff to the street. The topographic mapping and plans need to include the culvert information. Should any of the meeting attendees have additions or corrections, please email the information to me as soon as possible. I would then issue amended notes. Respectfully submitted by Mark W. Stiefel, P.E. Distribution List: Kulwant Sandhu, Property Owner/Applicant Darcy Miller, B-Twelve Wetland Ecologist John Sloan, DDES Wetland Ecologist Ramon Locsin, DDES Site Development Specialist John Rutledge, Cramer Northwest (Surveyor) Mark Stiefel, Project Engineer Project File Sandhu Mitigation Meeting Noles March 18, 2003 ® King County Department of De, .. elopment and Environmental Service 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 March 5, 2003 Mr. Kulwant Sandhu 13989 SE 159 1h Pl. Renton, WA 98058 RE: L02CG408, Sandhu Grading Restoration Dear Mr. Sandhu: Thank you for you letter requesting additional time till May 13, 2003 to submit the requested information. Your request is hereby granted. I will coordinate with your consultants in regards to an onsite meeting per you request. Our Senior Ecologist, Jon Sloan will be out of the office until March 11, 2003. Upon his return, I will coordinate the meeting. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (206) 296-7151, or by e-mail at Ramon.Locsin(mmetrokc.goy. ~i,hcerelyn J, - (.fa-.r L, ~ Rkon C. Lo sin, ite Development Specialist Land Use/ SD Ki g County ODES Cc: Jon Sloan, King County ODES Kathy Newborn, King County DOES Darcy Miller, 8-Twelve Associates Mark W. Stiefel, Stiefel Engineering ODES file L02CG408 ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 January 13, 2003 Kulwant S. Sandhu 13989 SE 1591h PL Renton, WA 98058 RE: L02CG408, Sandhu Grading Restoration Dear Mr. Sandhu: King County Department of Developmental and Environmental Services have completed a preliminary review and site visit for the above referenced permit application and determined that the following information is required to continue review of this proposal. SENSITIVE AREAS REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. Photographs taken immediately following the unauthorized clearing and grading indicate that fill material was placed within the wetland. The wetland report indicates that "it appears that the clearing/ grading occurred within the wetland buffer only, and not in wetlands." The site visit confirms that fill material has been placed within wetlands as well as the wetlands buffer, although it is difficult to determine the extent without exan1ining soil borings. Provide a supplemental wetland analysis that includes a thorough examination of manually installed soil pits throughout the area adjacent to the channelized portion of Wetland A/B/C. The supplemental analysis shall be required prior to acceptance of delineated wetland boundaries. 2. To restore the wetland buffer to preexisting conditions, the proposal is to restore the original grade and re-seed with native grass seed mix. This strategy does not compensate for temporal loss of wetland functions and construction impacts. As such, additional wetland and / or buffer enhancement shall be required as compensatory mitigation. Once wetland boundaries have been approved, restoration plans that provide additional enhancement to offset temporal and construction related impacts will be required. Restoration plan shall be developed in accordance with the attached King County guidelines, "Sensitive Areas Mitigation/ Restoration Plans for Wetlands, Wetland Buffer, or Stream Buffer" and "Restoration & Enhancement of Sensitive Areas in King County" (2001). A split rail fence 1 (or approved other) installed at the buffer's edge and posted with sensitive areas signs to preclude additional disturbance may be used to satisfy the additional enhancement requirement. 3. The wetland report recommends that "because development will likely commence within the next year, we recommend that a monitoring schedule not be required. However, if the site is not developed, a 3-year monitoring program will be completed." King County restoration guidelines requires that (at least) a three year maintenance and monitoring program, including performance bond, be included with all restoration projects. Once wetland boundaries are approved, a three-year monitoring and maintenance plan will be required within the required restoration plan. Additionally, a completed bond quantity worksheet shall be required prior to plan approval. GRADING REVIEW COMMENTS: 4. Previously issued grading permit under L98G0091 was approved for 350 cubic yards. Total quantity of fill placed on the disturbed areas are at least 450 cubic yards based on the calculations submitted by Mark Stiefel, P .E. dated November 5, 2002. Based on the DOES staff site visit, it appears that fill placed on property accumulated over 500 cubic yards therefore triggering the required State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review. Provided IO copies of the SEP A checklists ( enclosed) along with 10 reduced copies of grading and restoration plans to accompany the SEP A checklists. 5. Provide scaled and dimensioned grading plans that show existing and proposed contours for all disturbed areas, including areas where removed fill from wetland and buffer is to be placed within the property. 6. Provided temporary sediment & erosion control plans consistent with Appendix "D" of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Further review of this proposal will not commence until the required information has been received. If the requested information is not received within sixty days (60) of the date of this letter, this permit application will be considered withdrawn and new application and filing fees will be required. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Ramon C. Locsin, Site Development Specialist, Land Use Services Division at (206) 296-7151, or by e-mail at Ramon.Locsin@ilmetrokc.gov. 2 • • /\ ;\ :'.::\ S~i 1cerely, I ) ./ \ . L -\r-· . . I Ramon C. Locsin-' Site Development Specialist Site Development Services Unit Cc: Jon Sloan, Senior Ecologist, KCDDES Kathy Newborn, SDS, KCDDES Darcy Miller, B-Twelve Associates Inc. King County files E02G0016 & L02CG408 Enclosures: SEPA Checklist Bond Quantity Checklist Sensitive Areas Mitigation/ Restoration Plans for Wetlands, Wetland Buffer, or Stream Buffer 3 FW: Sandhu -L02CG408 Page 1 of2 Locsin, Ramon From: Darcey Miller [darcey@b12assoc.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 1 :06 PM To: 'Locsin, Ramon' Cc: Jon.Sloan@metrokc.gov; Subject: RE: Sandhu -L02CG408 Ramon, That time and date works for both Mark and me, but we will have to confirm that our client can make it then. He will be back in the country tomorrow. I will let you know either way. We hope to have the revised survey (with additional delineation and topo, etc.) by the date of the site visit. Thank you. Darcey B. Miller Wetlands Ecologist B-twelve Associates 1103 W. Meeker St. Kent, WA 98032 (253) 859-0515 (253) 852-4732 Fax darcey@b12assoc.com -----Original Message----- From: Locsin, Ramon [mailto:Ramon.Locsin@MEfROKC.GOV] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 12:17 PM To: 'darcey@b12assoc.com' Subject: FW: Sandhu -L02CG408 -----Original Message----- From: Locsin, Ramon Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 200312:14 PM To: 'darc.y@b12assoc.com'; 'stiefel@integrityol.com' Cc: Sloan, Jon subject: Sandhu -L02CG408 03/12/03 Darcy & Mark: I would like to set up the on site meeting per Mr. Sandhu's request for Tuesday, March 18, 2003 at 10:00am. Please let me know if this schedule will work for both of you. Ramon C, Locsi,1 Site Development Specialist Site Development Services section Land Use Services Division 03/12/2003 MARK W. STIEFEL, P.E. CONSULTING • CIVIL ENGINEERING • PLANNING • PROJECT MANAGEMENT• WETLAND PERMITTING November 5, 2002 Ms. Darcy Miller B-Twelve Associates, Inc. 1103 W. Meeker Street, Suite C Kent, WA 98032 Tel: (253) 859-0515 Subject: Dear Darcy: Sandhu Property Wetland Restoration Project Code Enforcement Violation (Case #E02G0016) Earthwork Estimate Opinion Mr. Kulwant Sandhu authorized me to prepare an Engineer's Opinion of earthwork activities on his property located at 12044 SE 184th Street in King County. The Parcel numbers are 61899600320 and 6199600282. The combined site area is approximately 6.3 acres. Background Information: I reviewed the documentation you provided for my office, which included the following information. • King County Code Enforcement Violation Notice (Case #E02G0016) letter dated January 31, 2002. • DOES letter dated February 6, 2002 • Old Short Form Grading Permit (L98G0091) • Permit Application dated July 30, 2002, signed by the property owner • Affidavit for Application form dated July 30, 2002 • B-Twelve Wetland Analysis Report and Restoration Plan, dated August 5, 2002 • B-Twelve Existing Conditions Map, dated August 2002, with Kramer Survey information • I spoke with Ms. Kathy Newborn, King County Code Enforcement officer about her department's request for the applicant to submit an Engineer's Opinion of Onsite Earthwork Activities. • The Methodology, Considerations, and Limitations used in the earthwork estimate are enclosed for reference. 22312 113th AVE. S.E. KENT, WASHINGTON 98031-2651 TEL: {253) 854-7472 CELL: (206) 300-5853 FAX: (253) 854-1575 EMAIL: stiefel@integrityol.com Ms. Darcy Miller B-Twelve Associates, Inc. November 5, 2002 Page 2 Site Visit Documentation: On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, I conducted a site investigation of the subject property to develop an Engineer's Opinion of Onsite Earthwork Activities in support of the Application for a Restoration Plan. During the visit, I observed the B-Twelve wetland flags that were reestablished on September 16, 2002. The wetland edge, SO-foot buffers, and approximate limits of prior clearing and earthwork appeared consistent with the Existing Conditions Map provided, with the exception of the southerly extent of clearing limits. Engineer's Opinion of Earthwork Volumes: 1. The Engineer's Opinion is that approximately 200 to 250 cubic yards of earthwork activity occurred within the SO-foot wetland buffer areas, as flagged in the field and identified on the preliminary site map. The disturbance appeared to include a combination of imported fill and grading. 2. It is also the Engineer's Opinion that the initial permitted fill (L98G0091), together with subsequent fill and grading activity resulted in at least 450 cubic yards of earthwork on the subject site outside the wetland buffer area. Limitations: This letter of opinion was prepared for the applicant's use in the permit for resolving the current Code Enforcement Violation (Case #E02G0016). The methods and limitations discussed herein were provided after consultation with the Code Enforcement Officer, the Owner, and B-Twelve Associates, Inc. The intent of this analysis and Opinion is to provide the King County Code Enforcement Section with supplemental technical information to assist in the determination of what permit process and additional documentation may be required to complete the permit process and remedy the land use violation. This opinion letter was provided for the exclusive use of the property owner in accordance with a generally accepted level of service within the local engineering consulting community at this time. No other expressed or implied usage of this letter opinion is intended. Ms. Darcy Miller B-Twelve Associates, Inc. November 5, 2002 Page 3 Should the King County Code Enforcement Section or the property owner desire to obtain a more accurate estimate of prior earthwork activities, then a more detailed topographic survey, limited soil investigation and more complex analysis would be required. However, given the extensive onsite ground disturbances, the level of accuracy obtained from more detailed measurement and analysis would also result in a range of probable earthwork volumes. I appreciate the opportunity to provide this limited op1ruon letter on behalf of the Applicant and property owner Mr. Kulwant Sandhu. Should any of the parties have questions, please feel free to contact me at (253) 854-7472. Sincerely, Enclosure: Methodology, Considerations, and Limitations in Estimating Earthwork Cc: Mr. Kulwant Sandhu, Applicant MWS/mws C:\winword\22802 Sandhu\22802 Earthwork Opinion Letter Sandhu Property Wetland Restoration Project Code Enforcement Violation (Case #E02G0016) Earthwork Estimate Opinion Methodology: The following steps were taken to prepare this Engineer's Opinion of Earthwork Volume I. A 50-foot grid was laid out on the Existing Conditions Map (Map) for the westerly 300 feet of the site 2. A 25-foot grid was laid out on the Existing Conditions Map for the easterly 200 feet of the site. 3. At each of the grid comers shown on the Map, the engineer estimated the approximate depth of fill, based upon visual observation of adjacent ground lines and limited probing of the site soils. Notations were made on the worksheet regarding specific fill pile locations. 4. The approximate limits of fill and/or earthwork and clearing were compared to the Map documentation. 5. The average fill depth for each grid section was computed by adding the grid comer elevations and dividing for four ( 4). The average fill depth was indicated on the worksheet in a circle with a plus ( +) symbol. 6. The average fill volume for each westerly grid section was computed by multiplying the average fill depth (feet) by the grid area (50' *50') and dividing by 27 to convert to in place cubic yards. The fill volume for each grid section was indicated on the map in a rectangle. 7. The average fill volume for each easterly grid section was computed by multiplying the average fill depth (feet) by the grid area (25'*25') and dividing by 27 to convert to in place cubic yards. The fill volume for each grid section was indicated on the map in a rectangle. 8. A rough estimate comparison was made of the rough volume of earthwork if a uniform one-foot deep layer of fill were placed over the westerly 300-foot by 200- foot grid area. The volume was computed to be approximately 2,222 cubic yards. . . . ~ Sandhu Property Wetland Restoration Project Code Enforcement Violation (Case #E02GOO 16) Earthwork Estimate Opinion Considerations and Limitations in Estimating Earthwork: • No pre-earthwork topographic survey information was available for the subject site according to the applicant and B-Twelve Associates, Inc. • No post disturbance topographic survey information was available for use m computing earthwork volumes according to standard engineering procedures. The property owner did not have written documentation of the amounts of fill material placed under the original 1998 Grading Permit #(L98G0091). No truck tickets, weigh bills, or inspection records are available to verify the original fill and grading activities. • A vegetative covering over the prior fill area and recently disturbed areas makes it more difficult to visually estimate what the original ground elevations and contours may have been prior to fill placement and subsequent grading. • Using visual estimates of probable fill depth is subjective, within a level of accuracy of about one to two feet (l' to 1.5'). Using a fifty-foot grid layout to estimate average fill depths also introduces reasonable variation in subsequent calculations. (If an average one-foot (I') depth of fill material were placed within the 1.4-acre disturbed area, the resulting fill volume would be 2,222 cubic yards.) Therefore, the potential level of accuracy in visual estimating could be plus or minus 2,200 to 3,300 cubic yards. • Extending the grid layout beyond the indicated limits of clearing on the Map also introduces a degree of variation in subsequent calculations. MARK W. STIEFEL, P.E. CONSULTING • CIVIL ENGINEERING • PLANNING • PROJECT MANAGEMENT• WETLAND PERMITTING November 5, 2002 Ms. Darcy Miller B-Twelve Associates, Inc. 1103 W. Meeker Street, Suite C Kent, WA 98032 Tel: (253) 859-0515 Subject: Dear Darcy: Sandhu Property Wetland Restoration Project Code Enforcement Violation (Case #E02G0016) Earthwork Estimate Opinion Mr. Kulwant Sandhu authorized me to prepare an Engineer's Opinion of earthwork activities on his property located at 12044 SE 184th Street in King County. The Parcel numbers are 61899600320 and 6199600282. The combined site area is approximately 6.3 acres. Background Information: I reviewed the documentation you provided for my office, which included the following information. • King County Code Enforcement Violation Notice (Case #E02G0016) letter dated January 31, 2002. • DDES letter dated February 6, 2002 • Old Short Form Grading Permit (L98G0091) • Permit Application dated July 3 0, 2002, signed by the property owner • Affidavitfor Application form dated July 30, 2002 • B-Twelve Wetland Analysis Report and Restoration Plan, dated August 5, 2002 • B-Twelve Existing Conditions Map, dated August 2002, with Kramer Survey information • I spoke with Ms. Kathy Newborn, King County Code Enforcement officer about her department's request for the applicant to submit an Engineer's Opinion of Onsite Earthwork Activities. • The Methodology, Considerations, and Limitations used in the earthwork estimate are enclosed for reference. 22312 113th AVE. S.E. KENT, WASHINGTON 98031-2651 TEL: (253) 854-7472 CELL: (206) 300-5853 FAX: (253) 854-1575 EMAIL: stiefel@integrityol.com Ms. Darcy Miller B-Twelve Associates, Inc. November 5, 2002 Page 2 Site Visit Documentation: On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, I conducted a site investigation of the subject property to develop an Engineer's Opinion of Onsite Earthwork Activities in support of the Application for a Restoration Plan. During the visit, I observed the B-Twelve wetland flags that were reestablished on September 16, 2002. The wetland edge, 50-foot buffers, and approximate limits of prior clearing and earthwork appeared consistent with the Existing Conditions Map provided, with the exception of the southerly extent of clearing limits. Engineer's Opinion of Earthwork Volumes: I. The Engineer's Opinion is that approximately 200 to 250 cubic yards of earthwork activity occurred within the 50-foot wetland buffer areas, as flagged in the field and identified on the preliminary site map. The disturbance appeared to include a combination of imported fill and grading. 2. It is also the Engineer's Opinion that the initial permitted fill (L98G0091 ), together with subsequent fill and grading activity resulted in at least 450 cubic yards of earthwork on the subject site outside the wetland buffer area. Limitations: This letter of opinion was prepared for the applicant's use in the permit for resolving the current Code Enforcement Violation (Case #E02GOOI6). The methods and limitations discussed herein were provided after consultation with the Code Enforcement Officer, the Owner, and B-Twelve Associates, Inc. The intent of this analysis and Opinion is to provide the King County Code Enforcement Section with supplemental technical information to assist in the determination of what permit process and additional documentation may be required to complete the permit process and remedy the land use violation. This opinion letter was provided for the exclusive use of the property owner in accordance with a generally accepted level of service within the local engineering consulting community at this time. No other expressed or implied usage of this letter opinion is intended. • Ms. Darcy Miller B-Twelve Associates, Inc. November 5, 2002 Page 3 Should the King County Code Enforcement Section or the property owner desire to obtain a more accurate estimate of prior earthwork activities, then a more detailed topographic survey, limited soil investigation and more complex analysis would be required. However, given the extensive onsite ground disturbances, the level of accuracy obtained from more detailed measurement and analysis would also result in a range of probable earthwork volumes. I appreciate the opportunity to provide this limited opm10n letter on behalf of the Applicant and property owner Mr. Kulwant Sandhu. Should any of the parties have questions, please feel free to contact me at (253) 854-7472. Sincerely, Enclosure: Methodology, Considerations, and Limitations in Estimating Earthwork Cc: Mr. Kulwant Sandhu, Applicant :MWS/mws C:lwinword\22802 Sandhu\22802 Earthwork Opinion Letter Sandhu Property Wetland Restoration Project Code Enforcement Violation (Case #E02G0016) Earthwork Estimate Opinion Methodology: The following steps were taken to prepare this Engineer's Opinion of Earthwork Volume 1. A SO-foot grid was laid out on the Existing Conditions Map (Map) for the westerly 300 feet of the site 2. A 25-foot grid was laid out on the Existing Conditions Map for the easterly 200 feet of the site. 3. At each of the grid comers shown on the Map, the engineer estimated the approximate depth of fill, based upon visual observation of adjacent ground lines and limited probing of the site soils. Notations were made on the worksheet regarding specific fill pile locations. 4. The approximate limits of fill and/or earthwork and clearing were compared to the Map documentation. 5. The average fill depth for each grid section was computed by adding the grid comer elevations and dividing for four (4). The average fill depth was indicated on the worksheet in a circle with a plus ( +) symbol. 6. The average fill volume for each westerly grid section was computed by multiplying the average fill depth (feet) by the grid area (50'*50') and dividing by 27 to convert to in place cubic yards. The fill volume for each grid section was indicated on the map in a rectangle. 7. The average fill volume for each easterly grid section was computed by multiplying the average fill depth (feet) by the grid area (25'*25') and dividing by 27 to convert to in place cubic yards. The fill volume for each grid section was indicated on the map in a rectangle. 8. A rough estimate comparison was made of the rough volume of earthwork if a uniform one-foot deep layer of fill were placed over the westerly 300-foot by 200- foot grid area. The volume was computed to be approximately 2,222 cubic yards. Sandhu Property Wetland Restoration Project Code Enforcement Violation (Case #E02G0016) Earthwork Estimate Opinion Considerations and Limitations in Estimating Earthwork: • No pre-earthwork topographic survey information was available for the subject site according to the applicant and B-Twelve Associates, Inc. • No post disturbance topographic survey information was available for use m computing earthwork volumes according to standard engineering procedures. The property owner did not have written documentation of the amounts of fill material placed under the original 1998 Grading Permit #(L98G0091). No truck tickets, weigh bills, or inspection records are available to verify the original fill and grading activities. • A vegetative covering over the prior fill area and recently disturbed areas makes it more difficult to visually estimate what the original ground elevations and contours may have been prior to fill placement and subsequent grading. • Using visual estimates of probable fill depth is subjective, within a level of accuracy of about one to two feet (l' to 1.5'). Using a fifty-foot grid layout to estimate average fill depths also introduces reasonable variation in subsequent calculations. (If an average one-foot (l ') depth of fill material were placed within the 1.4-acre disturbed area, the resulting fill volume would be 2,222 cubic yards.) Therefore, the potential level of accuracy in visual estimating could be plus or minus 2,200 to 3,300 cubic yards. • Extending the grid layout beyond the indicated limits of clearing on the Map also introduces a degree of variation in subsequent calculations. - Ramon C. Locsin, Site Development Specialist King County Land Use Services Division 900 Oaksdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 Tel: (206) 296-7151 Subject: L02CG408, Sandhu Grading Restoration Request for Time Extension and Site Meeting Dear Mr. Locsin: This letter is a formal request for a time extension for the resubmittal of technical information requested in your January 13, 2003 letter to me regarding the above noted project. My consultant team reviewed the DOES letter and is coordinating the additional information. They requested an onsite meeting with County staff to review and discuss whether wetlands were impacted by the recent unauthorized site disturbance activities by my former tenant. I am scheduled to be out of the Country from Feb 22 thru Mar 12, 2003. I would not have adequate time to coordinate the information from my consultant team before the March 13 1h submittal date. Therefore, I request that you grant a time extension to May 13th. This should provide adequate time for scheduling an onsite meeting with your staff and then preparation of the necessary resubmittal information, subject to my review and authorization. Please contact Darcy Miller at B-Twelve Associates (wetland scientist) and my project engineer Mark Stiefel (253) 854-7472 to schedule the meeting. Also please provide a written confirmation of the time extension. Thank you for your assistance in resolving this matter. Sincerely, WJ~ Mr. Kulwant Sandhu 13989 SE 159 1h Place Renton, WA 98058 Tel: (425) 269-7270 Cc: Darcy Miller at B-Twelve Associates Mark W. Stiefel, P.E., Stiefel Engineering ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, \'v' A 98055-1219 January 13, 2003 Kulwant S. Sandhu 13989 SE 159'1, Pl. Renton, WA 98058 RE: L02CG408, Sandhu Grading Restoration Dear Mr. Sandhu: King County Department of Developmental and Environmental Services have completed a preliminary review and site visit for the above referenced permit application and detennined that the following information is required to continue review of this proposal. SENSITIVE AREAS REVIEW COMMENTS: I. Photographs taken immediately following the unauthorized clearing and grading indicate that fill material was placed within the wetland. The wetland report indicates that "it appears that the clearing/ grading occurred within the wetland buffer only, and not in wetlands." The site visit confirms that fill material has been placed within wetlands as well as the wetlands buffer, although it is difficult to determine the extent without examining soil borings. Provide a supplemental wetland analysis that includes a thorough examination of manually installed soil pits throughout the area adjacent to the channelized portion of Wetland NB!C. The supplemental analysis shall be required prior to acceptance of delineated wetland boundaries. 2. To restore the wetland buffer to preexisting conditions, the proposal is to restore the original grade and re-seed with native grass seed mix. This strategy does not compensate for temporal loss of wetland functions and construction impacts. As such, additional wetland and/ or buffer enhancement shall be required as compensatory mitigation. Once wetland boundaries have been approved, restoration plans that provide additional enhancement to offset temporal and construction related impacts will be required. Restoration plan shall be developed in accordance with the attached King County guidelines, "Sensitive Areas Mitigation / Restoration Plans for Wetlands, Wetland Buffer, or Stream Buffer" and "Restoration & Enhancement of Sensitive Areas in King County" (2001). A split rail fence 1 ( or approved other) installed at the buffer's edge and posted with sensitive areas signs to preclude additional disturbance may be used to satisfy the additional enhancement reg u i rem en t. 3. The wetland report recommends that "because development will likely commence within the next year, we recommend that a monitoring schedule not be required. However, if the site is not developed, a 3-year monitoring program will be completed." King County restoration guidelines requires that (at least) a three year maintenance and monitoring program, including performance bond, be included with all restoration projects. Once wetland boundaries are approved, a three-year monitoring and maintenance plan will be required within the required restoration plan. Additionally, a completed bond quantity worksheet shall be required prior to plan approval. GRADING REVIEW COMMENTS: 4. Previously issued grading permit under L98G0091 was approved for 350 cubic yards. Total quantity of fill placed on the disturbed areas are at least 450 cubic yards based on the calculations submitted by Mark Stiefel, P.E. dated November 5, 2002. Based on the DDES staff site visit, it appears that fill placed on property accumulated over 500 cubic yards therefore triggering the required State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review. Provided 10 copies of the SEP A checklists ( enclosed) along with IO reduced copies of grading and restoration plans to accompany the SEPA checklists. 5. Provide scaled and dimensioned grading plans that show existing and proposed contours for all disturbed areas, including areas where removed fill from wetland and buffer is to be placed within the property. 6. Provided temporary sediment & erosion control plans consistent with Appendix "D" of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Further review of this proposal will not commence until the required information has been received. If the requested information is not received within sixty days (60) of the date of this letter, this permit application will be considered withdrawn and new application and filing fees will be required. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Ramon C. Locsin, Site Development Specialist, Land Use Services Division at (206) 296-7151, or by e-mail at Ramon.Locsin@metrokc.gov. 2 • Sihcerely, . I i" ;\ j /1,.__ I .) ,,/ i r' __ l . I..-. Ramon C. LocsiJ Site Development Specialist Site Development Services Unit Cc: Jon Sloan, Senior Ecologist, KCDDES Kathy Newborn, SDS, KCDDES Darcy Miller, B-Twelve Associates Inc. King County files E02G0016 & L02CG408 Enclosures: SEP A Checklist Bond Quantity Checklist Sensitive Areas Mitigation/ Restoration Plans for Wetlands, Wetland Buffer, or Stream Buffer 3 ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oaksdale Ave SW Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Monday, December 02, 2002 Activity Number: L02CG408 Project Number: L02CG408 CHARGES Description Sens Area Rev Res Complx Counter Service Fees Grd/Clr Issue CounterFee Ord Rev Res/1.01 to 5 LUSD Work Without Permit Deposit Based on Est Hrs SUBTOTAL: PAYMENTS Description Suspense Account SUBTOTAL: CHANGE GIVEN: BALANCE DUE: FEE RECEIPT Applicant: KULWANT SANDHU Checklog Check# Payee Checklog Check# Payee 54079 8234 KULWANTSANDHU Date Entered Date Entered 12/02/2002 Amount $682.00 $187.00 $187.00 $1,089.00 $1,089.00 $792.00 $4,026.00 Amount ($3,234.00) ($3,234.00) $0.00 $792.00 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to DOES at the time of application. ODES permit fees were restructured effective March 4th, 1999. Many fees previously assessed a flat fee, now are assessed as hourly charges. Because of this change, and to ensure that our customers secure permits as quickly as possible, permits may be Issued prior to all hourly charges being recorded into our billing system. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant. All fees must be paid in full before DDES issues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. Printed on: Monday, December 02, 2002 at 10:06:55 Page I of I ®DDES King County Department of Development and Environmental Servitts Ren!on~ W.'\ ~55-1219 Application No. I, f< U / 1,va () t )a. '1 d hu... , hereby certify that I am an/the owner of the property which is the subject of this application for permit or approval. Ifl am not the sole owner of the property, I certify that I am authorized by any and all other owners of the property to make this certification and transfer any and all rights I/we have to apply for this permit or approval to:---------------- !, therefore certify that is the "applicant" for this permit or approval and shall remain the "applicant" for the duration of this permit or approval unless "applicant" status is transferred in writing on a form provided by this department. By being the "applicant," that individual assumes financial responsibility for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. 1 certify under penalty of perjury under the Jaws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct /~ 2..c. l<rJ' ~~ 11~-0 )_ Signature of Owner Date Signed I, 1< vt I ({) a vi+ San d h u...., , hereby certify that I am the "applicant" for this permit or approval. I shall remain the "applicant" for the duration of this permit or approval unless "applicant" status is transferred in writing on a form provided by this department. I accept financial responsibility for all fees associated with this permit·or approval and will receive any refunds. 1!i... ·', My mailing address is: I ?/'f Z4 , 5£ I '£7 f(. f<en+on M1 'j8'.D5't -OR- I, , hereby certify that I am an authorized agent of ----------'' a corporation or other business association authorize.) to .do business in the State of Washington and that this business association is the "applicant" for this permit or approval and is financially responsible for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. This association shall remain the "applicant" for the duration of this permit.or approval unless "applicant" status is transferred in writing on a form provided by this department. The mailing address of this business association is:----------------- I certify 0 under penalty of perjury under the Jaws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. ~ L. f lh~ II~ )-6--(J l- ignature of Applicant Date Signed S:\P_TECH\Tara D\Forms\Certification & Transfer of App Status.doc 09/21/00 NOTICE TO APPLICANTS: By law, this department returns all engineering and other plans to the applicant. If, however, you wish to authorize the department to return engineering and other plans directly to the engineer, architect, or other consultant for the limited purpose of making corrections, please designate below: 1 authorize this department to return plan directly to my consultant(s) for the limited purpose of making corrections, as designated on this form. CONSULT ANTS: f nc . ~ S_ ~ /(,,, )-C _!}).._ ------'---"--"-----Signature of Applicant Date Signed S:\P_TECH\Tari D\Forms\Certification & Transfer of App Status.doc 09/21/00 ; MARK W. STIEFEL, P.E. CONSULTING • CIVIL ENGINEERING • PLANNING • PROJECT MANAGEMENT• WETLAND PERMITTING June 25, 2003 Ms. Darcy Miller B-Twelve Associates, Inc. 1103 W Meeker Street, Suite C Kent, WA 98032 Tel (253)-852-2760 RECEIVED SITE DEVELOPMENT JUN 2 ? 28:3 KING CO. ,&cs .. eg Subject: Sandhu Grading Restoration Project (L02CG408) REVI s IO r·.J Transmittal of Engineering Mitigation Plans & Estimate Dear Darcy: Transmitted herein for your information and inclusion in a formal submittal to King County Department of Design and Environmental Services (DDES) are the following documents. This information is provided at the owner's request to satisfy DDES grading violation notice requirements. I understand you will provide the wetland and buffer mitigation planting plans and related estimates for use by the County in determining any bonding requirement amounts. • Three copies of Civil Engineering Plans & Specifications C-I through C-5 • Three copies of Topographic Survey prepared by Cramer NW, Inc. • Three copies of Engineer's Estimate for grading mitigation work for bond amounts Transmitted under separate cover are additional copies of the documentation for the Owner, the Surveyor, and your office files. Should you or DDES require additional information, please contact me at (253) 854-7472. Sincerely, , t:7ri«Uf/.-~/! Mark W. Stiefel, P E ,_ Project Civil Engineer Enclosures: Cc: Kulwant Sandhu-Owner (2 copies of submittal documents) Darcy Miller -B-Twelve (I copy of submittal documents) Cramer NW, Inc. (I copy of submittal documents) MWS/mws C:lwinword\228 Sandhu\Transmittal letter to B-Twelve.doc 22312 113th AVE. S.E. KENT, WASHINGTON 98031-2651 TEL: (253) 854-7472 CELL: (206) 300-5853 FAX: (253) 854-1575 EMAIL: stiefel_eng@msn.com i~ i r ~i~ .. ' l?! ,, . ' jt HI <;'i ~ ~ ~ !2 '! !1 • " !:ti " i~:,, J? ~;! ' i H iii ~ . :1@ . . ~ ~ ii : .. } . ' ~"'"' I, ~ - + "' .. u SL<;l -,c;;i-(rc;?.i :,:;-; ;:..:_,. i,q-(;-c;?.; -::i. 1;Aqh~§ ll~i r~~i"ijil iii ig~~t ;~_ ''' :i-i~~~~·~ i; ~ t" ~n~ .. f·j~ hi ~}r·~.-~ 1 ill t~?~3§5i~ ~l~~~-,::.~f ~~ :~ ~ ,,;:,1.d!? ~:r[ ,'.:·!jl;' h~ ~~§Q ~ ~ ~ig l§aih~l!'; ~~1i~ ~£-~ej ,····'·1' ~'t~I' ~I, h:~;1~ t i!!I ~~ .. ! i~! .. ~-t:, .S9i:-:,:ogc:, '1.'A "HO>; ] S ;llt,:l.,':,-·Urtl l>?ll ~·N,<:JJ:cr--1;.1~1~ , uns h ~! ., '·"'"·"'-' , .. ., ... , . .,,., ~~l 1~ ~i~~~ ~iH~ i;~J e~ ~, ~ c£l'~" ihH ~:iia ~~i~l "~"Lt l !''h ... II! ~ -~. i : f 1!! ! nu~ d; ii~~ ' 1~-;: I ;;;~; I !~~:€= jl!i; Ii h!li: I• ., ti~i:: 1~iti ~~-~ t~~?J " 11,:i ,, !~~i ,~~:il : ~ii lg Hi: 1l!1ti i ~x~~a . ~--. " I !i,!ii:"'.,:..:-, . 1; 1m !5~ •( ""' ., .. ,,., 8SC83 1\,)_J~l 1 ·'SV'>'. N,:_ 's]~ lJJi:.;.':: ·-~Mll JS t,;,,Jll ~ Al~:CdOcb n-::;N'1S lN\'M 111>+ ! NC V':-_ Vi O'N~-~'I, l·HJN~3 ' C ' •-NI'>~ .r, J, c'.:0:.:0c.'.::.: ' ,, ,, •' ""'""'"'' ,~,.,.,, ... ., ' --; '"'l,i :·;C;~-L~:JilS '1.'~ 'l 'ft-A 1 '.o 3f'"{3i·'." Hl\-:'.L Z:>?:: Sl/\',cl3:0t,,~·fs] l]_,J,_S I './ .,· ;J/J.'IJ.~ r f/J,02 1 '""' "':""'";,.,-.. .:.,.,-,m~, ~,,.,,,, ;_,.-.:-~-... - ' ,, ~: ~' ~: gc;,"1,;,; 1.0_:..:.'l I-S's'\' 't,,( L ',-i:- ~J]t_S '"'l 71:, 3S t,7:J;::, ~ !,._cJ::idOb1 ,~1-'.:N'i'S I WM.--,1~i, ~ NC'.l 'iC'_ll"l :Jt,\• l.:_JM rlHO~v'S ! ' .>. -~-e " 0 u " 0 0 I i;;_,.. ,l-~Sc/-;:;:;;z; ~ j/ ,:(" ~ i";._ ~ • l ~: -~' ,, I i~ ,.,.,,,, ....... ''""''°"''" 14-""', ..... Z[';t_-7c;.,;--(1:,;.;'-131 lS9->,£09ti '<IN, 'lN~>l :: s Jn~~t."1 -icl:L. 1'.l::z::: '.)l\j·/-'i1N'0N! l3J3.1S , 11 <''='·9 <~ ._-=) '.f"S ::Jn:\":J,l V H.lOZ I ;-,.:;,-;,i""'·-,,·~, ... -;...,,,-,.~ .. , ;;..,;;, •• ;;;::;;;;. - 1 :,:Jc_s -i,81 JS '11':JlL $ Ali:!:CdCCl::, nt-CNVS lNVl,\lr;. N01.1.VJUl'i ,JN\I""!_;.~ r,-t]N'iS ! .I ... vi I..\ Sll\'."JO CN.,. -..~-,d '.iNIGl'tJ'.:· ~-~ '!~--. ' tS9?-,.::Jl:l5 ~.Y. 'l'·JJJ" ; S 3'"'~;;.-.s; -;H:c' i'.1,'Z:1'. '..)Nlc::i"~~l~rJJ -.J..:!:'11S 2;·=·~5 <.;C~')\IH:0~.V. "NC_fl]-:: _;;us <"11>l. JS T70Z, ~. HddO<;d r,1--K,NVS 1r-;';.',\lr>i NOl.!.VSUl-1 GN;;'ll -W. ('..JOfJ'i'S • C ( Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet King County Department of Development & Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southweat Renton, Washington 98055-1219 ProJectName: , ::'5~//c.·• 6£4'-:;--;:;;:i-A?7A1,.· Date: ?ff-";{« ~ C :L ~c:Z c··ceyo;; Location: /·,>:c:·,,z-:t/ 1 -54::: /z"::i:(77-../ 'j/. SIERRA ProJect No.: ; ,«-/~-;Qji./ . t,y;~ / Cleartng greater than or equal to 5000 board feet of timber? ______ yes If yes, /' no Forest Practice Permit Number: ______ _ (RCW 76.09) Page 1 of 9 S:PUBLIC\LUSD\LUISIREFBD SITE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET SIERRA Actlvlly No.: Note: All prices Include labor, equipment, matertals, overhead and profit. Prices are from RS Means data adjusted for the Seattle area or from local sources If not Included In the RS Means database. Unit prices updated 12/97 Revision date: 8/22198 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet $ SWDM 6.4.8.3 I$ WSDOT 9-03.9(3) 1 $ $ Excavation-bulk T I $ SWDM 5.4.3.1 $ $ SWDM 5.4.2.4 $ SWDM 5.4.2.2 $ SWDM 5.4.2.1 $ SWDM 5.4.2.1 $ $ $ $ ed I SWDM 5.4.2.3 $ WSDOT 9-13.1 (2) $ SWDM 5.4.4.1 $ SWDM 5.4.4. 1 $ SWDM 5.4.5.2 $ SWDM 5.4.5.1 $ SWDM 5.4.5.1 $ SWDM 6.4.2.4 $ SWDM 5.4.2.5 $ SWDM 6.4.2.5 $ $ i Page 2 of 9 S:PUBl IC\LUSD\LUIS\REF8D SITE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET I. 58.70 74.30 7.03 1.30 1.20 1.20 0.51 1.26 1.75 0.48 9.30 14.00 18.00 2.00 33.98 1 273.34 2,546.68 1,695.11 15.57 59.60 0.44 5.24 6.48 65.00 Each I C I CY CY I ·'7£) CY LF LF SY I H?;'e:.·T SY SY SY LF LF LF I .,,,J ,--, ' -I SY CY Each ESC SUBTOTAL: COLUMN: / - / / I -7.,. _/ },' / ---.-?..a:~ C, I '?'~C/ $ 'Zt:~~~ Unit prices updated 12/97 Revision date: B/22/98 ) \ Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet $ $ 7.42 CY $ 0.31 SY $ 7.718.40 Acre $ 1.30 CY $ 3.53 CY $ 18.13 LF $ 11.69 LF 20' 1 $ 1.105.92 Each $ 10.54 LF $ 19.63 CY $ 22.16 CY $ 32.91 CY $ 47.23 SY $ SS.09 SY $ 116.20 SY $ 1.76 SY s 0.83 SY $ 117.50 Each $ 2.50 Each $ 6.49 SY $ 686.44 Dav $ 1 363.60 Acr• rs) _] $ 74.07 HR $ e.eo SY $ 7.24 SY $ 7.12 SY concrete I $ 38.40 SF $ 8.25 SF Page 3 of 9 SUBTOTAL -f- 'KCC 27 A authorizes only one bond reduction. S:PUBLIC\LUSD\LUISIREFBD SITE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET ¢ </, "7 ; ~~..? :;;~,,....,G~ '-° .:::. /;%, ?''CZ l i Unit prices updated 12197 Revision date: 8122198 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet 5.00 SY 1.20 SY 35.77 SY 28.11 LF 38.17 LF :urb & GU Har, rolled 11.64 LF ::utb & Gutter1 vettlcal $ 8.43 LF :urb and Gutter, damolllon and dlopooal $ 11.81 LF $ 2.12 LF $ 2.23 LF $ 1.61 LF $ 1.47 LF $ 0.88 LF Shouldor, AC, ( 110 AC road unit prioo $ . SY Shoulder, gra\111, 4' lhlolc $ 8.85 SY Sidewall<, 4' lhlolc $ 28.54 SY Sidewall<, 4' thlolc, domolltion and dlepoeal $ 24.1 t SY Sldawalk, 5' thick $ 30.S8 SY Sidewalk, 5' lhlolc, damollllon and dl1po1ol $ 30.13 SY Sign, handle&! $ 74.16 Each $ 5.06 Eaoh $ 2.07 SF $ 0.22 LF Page 4ol8 SUBTOTAL 'KCC 27 A authorizes only one bond reduction. S:PUBLIC\LUSDILUISIREFBD SITE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET /L-4C -/-/ Untt prices updated 12197 Revision date: 8/22/98 i Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet $ AC Ovorlav, 1.5' AC $ 8.43 SY AC OVertav, 2' AC $ 7.81 SY AC Road, 2', 4' rook, First 2600 SY $. 14.99 SY AC Road, 2', 4' rock, Qtv. ovor 2500SY $ 11.82 SY 1AC Road 3', 4' rock, First 2500 SY $ 17.12 SY IAC Road, 3', 4' rock, Qtv. over 2500 SY $ 13.75 SY !AC Road. 6', Flrat 2500 SY $ 12.87 SY IAC Road, 6', Qlv. OVor 2600 SY $ 12.12 SY $ 14.57 SY $ 14.02 SY $ 8.01 SY (Gravel Road, 4' rock First 2500 SY s 9.82 SY Gravel Road. 4' rock, Qlv. over 2500 SY • 6.55 SY PCC Road, 5' no baao, ovor 2500 SY $ 18.70 SY PCC Aoed, 8', no baao, over 2500 SY $ 19.02 SY ITI11ckenod Edot $ 5.89 LF Paga 5 of 9 SUBTOTAL [/ I r- ·Kee 27A au1horizes only ona bond raductlon. • S:PU8Lle\LUSO\LUIS1REF8D SITE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET ,, Unit prices updatad 12/97 Revision date: 8/22/98 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Acco•• Road, RIO s 14.68 SY Bollard• • fixed $ 209.34 Each Bollards· romovabla $ 393.34 Each ' !CBo Include frame and I!!!} $ 1,093.80 Each $ 1,248.80 Each $ 1,788.32 Each $ 379.68 FT $ 1,906.68 Each $ 423.07 FT $ 2,044.80 Each $ 488.68 FT $ 2,793.80 Each $ 601.92 FT $ 318.34 Each Cl11nout, PVC. 4" $ 113.62 Each Cloanout, PVC, 6' $ 162.09 Each Cleanout, PVC, 8' $ 194.95 Each Culvert, PVC, 4' $ 7.51 LF Culvert, PVC, a· $ 10.98 LF Culvert, PVC, 8' $ 11.69 LF Culvert, PVC, 12' $ 18.93 LF Culvert, CMP, 8' $ 15.00 lF Culvert, CMP, 12' $ 23.00 LF Culvert, CMP, 16' $ 28.46 LF Culvert, CMP, 18' $ 32.82 LF Culvert, CMP, 24' $ 46.37 LF Culvert, CMP, 30' $ 62.13 LF Culvert, CMP, 36' $ 97.49 LF Culvert, CMP, 48' $ 122.46 LF Culvert, CMP, 80' $ 204.74 LF Culvert, CMP, 72' $ 283.11 LF / Page e of 9 SUBTOTAL (! ~· 'KCC 27 A authorizes only one bond reducllon. S:PUBLIC\LUSD\LUIS\REF8D SITE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET ) ) Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet [*;1@:ffiFOOfu'ti.'ffi Culvert, Concrete, a· $ 18.28 LF Culvort, Concrata, 12" $ 28.13 LF Culvar1, Concrata. 16• $ 32.47 LF Culvert, Coner•• 18' $ 38.70 LF Culvert Concreta 24' $ 53.10 LF CulVort, Concreta. 30' $ 90.59 LF Culvert Concroi., 38" $ 119.88 LF Culvert, Concrete, 42' $ 137.78 LF Cut,,art, Concrete. 49• $ 152.98 LF CUivert CPP, 8' $ 9.30 LF CUivert CPP, 8' $ 14.00 LF Culvert, CPP, 12' $ 18.00 LF CUivert, CPP, 16' $ 20.00 LF Culvert, CPP. 18' $ 24.00 LF Culvert, CPP 24" $ 32.00 LF CUivert, CPP, 30' $ 42.00 LF $ 48.00 LF $ 7.03 CY $ 22.80 LF $ 19.86 LF $ 2.09 SY $ 85.00 HR 'Mid-tonk Aoce11 Riser, 48' dla, 8' deoc l $ 1,398.00 Each $ 12. 18 SY ,rator, 12• $ 908.88 Each arator, 1s• $ 962.86 Each 1rator, 18" $ 998.88 Each $ 33.98 CY $ 870.00 Each [Tra•h Rack, 12' $ 184.32 Each !Trash Rack, 15' $ 208.32 Each Trash Rack, 18' $ 233.82 Each !Trash Rack, 21 • $ 288.82 Each Page 7 of 9 SUBTOTAL ~ 0 / "KCC 27 A authcrlzo only one bond reduction. S:PUBLIC\LUSD\LUIS1REF80 SITE BONO QUANTITY WORKSHEET \ d?2 /- Unit prices updated, 12/97 Revision date: 8/22/98 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet 2' AC 2' •-couroa rock & 4' borrow $ 13.77 SY 2' AC, 1.5' too course & 2.5' baea couroa $ 14.99 SY 4" setect borrow $ 3.911 SY 1.6' top couree rock & 2.5" base cour11 $ 9.92 SY EA. EA. SUBTOTAL e d V ;;: . BUBTOTAL(SUMALLPAGEB): r~ a .:::;,-::;'. 7? 30% CONTINGENCY & MOBILIZATION: / - 1 -h .ii; QRANDTOTAL: ,,;-,;, fr /-;",A'?/ COLUMN: (B C / D E Paga8of9 · 'KCC 27 A authorizes only one bond reduction. S:PUBLIC\LUSDILUISIREF8D SITE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET Unit prices updated 12/97 Revision date: 8/22/98 ) Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Original bond computations prepared by: Name: ~ nt::: , 5zy--~c:_ ,C-F-- / > y;f~ az&/40=Po/7 Date: £;/,;;' 9' /o ,3 .7 PE Registration Number: Firm Name: Address: -------."l"P ,,,{,./ /:=-~:c; Z~.3/2= // 3 .efl E -i& f::V'"4 yc~3'/ <<P4Z .·· PERFORMANCE 99J!Jm!! BONO'AMOUNT Slablllzatlon/Eroolon Sediment Control (ESC) Existing Right-of-Way Improvements (A) $ • µ--;7k (B) $ • > & Future Public Rood Improvements & Drainage Faollltleo Private Improvements (A+B+C+O) =TOTAL (T) PERFORMANCE BOND AMOUNT (C) $ • ~ (o) $ • /Z,,dP: $ . &,,5'" /i{-Y Minimum bond amount Is $1000. SITE RESTORATION BOND (A) $ '4:?-"f?? (First $7,500 of bend ohall be cash.) RIGHT-OF-WAY BOND (B) $ « • TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY & SITE RESTORATION BOND''I (A+B) $ ·7rc'; ,;;-{(, (First $7,600 of bond shell be cash.) 1 PERFORMANCE BOND TOTAL AFTER BONDI (T·E) --------- REDUCTION'" Tel.#: PUBLIC ROAD IMPROVEMENTS & DRAINAGE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE/DEFECT BONO' AMOUNT (B+C) X0.25= $ d / e~-..y -"'t'.~/2 NAME OF PERSON PREPARING BOND REDUCTION: Date: ____________ _ 'NOTE: The word "bond' Is used to represenl any financial guarantee acceptable to King County. "NOTE: KCC 27A authorizes bends to be combined when both are required . .. *NOTE: Per KCC 27A, total bond amounts remaining after reduction shall not be less lhan 30% of the original amount. Page 9 of 9 S:PUBLIC\LUSDILUIS\REFBD SITE BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET Unit price~ updated 12/97 Revision date: 8/22/98 Sent by: AAA WASHINGTON 4256462191; 11/18/02 4:16PM;J.etfall.._#593;Page 2/2 King County Road Services DJviai.ion ll=pi1rmu,m (If 'l'rMm,1mna110,1 ZDJ $uu1n J..ic~OII St11~el Sc.aule, W,\ 9810,4-38Gli TYPE OF CERTIFICATE t8J ORIGINAL 0 CONDITIONAL October 15, 2002 Certificate # 01443 File Number: 02-10-07-02 Exnires: October 15 2003 CERTIFICATE OF TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY 0 Specific conditions are described on the reverse siilc ufthisccrtifica1e. Pursuant 10 King County Code, Chap1..-14.70 a, amended, thi, cortiflcate confirm• thatthe level of service standard used in !he Transportation Concurrency Management proKr•m has been sat.isficil and sufficienl rOlld capacity is reserved for the developmcnl project described below. IMPORTANT: This ccrtilicatc docs 1101 £uaranlcc a developmcn, permit, Other uan•pnrtation improven1en1S and mitiga1ion will be required to comply with ln1crscclion Standards, Mitigation Payment Syste,n, King County road standards, and/or safety needs. I. Applicant f\ame and Address: Kulwant Sandhu, 13989 SE 159th Place, Renton, WA 2. Property Loca1ion: a. Propeny Address: 12044 SE 184th Place b. Develop,nem Name: Sandhu Development c. Parcel Nwnber: 6199600320 3. Type of Dcvelopmon1 Permit To Be Reques1ed: Formal Plat 4. Proposed Land Use, Single Family Residential S. Zone Location and Ro,orvcd Units: a. Concurrency Zone: 7911 Community Planning Area: S0011 Creek i. Commercial Projoc,-To1al Square Fcei: 0 ii. Mult~fiunily -Number ofUnilS: 0 ili. Single family -Number of'Uniis: 20 6. This Ccenificate i~ subj(;(., to th~ following general condition:i:; a. Thi~ Ccnificiue of Concurrency runs with me land and is 1ransfcrable only to subs.quent owners oflhe same properly for <he stated development, subject to the term;, condilions and expira1ion dale liBtcd her.,in. ThiB Cenilica1c of Concurrency is not ll'ansfen1blc to any other properly and has no commorciul value. This Certificate Expires: October 15, 2003 unless you apply for the dovelopmen1 pcnnit de&cribod above, prior to that dale. lf1his r0<Juiremen1 is nut met the King Couiuy Dcp1mment nfTrnn.sponation reserves the option to cancel your certificate and capacity reservation. When you apply for a devolopmtnt permil wltb King Counly'., Department of Dcvolopmenl and En•irou111cntal Services (ODES), bring this t'ertiOcato or Transporution Concurrency as part of 1hc development applic.eli•n pockaae. If yuu ban any q,...li<,ns, please call (206) 263-4712. l.intla Ooughdrt)', Mimag.:r. Road Sclrvice~ Divunon Department of Transpotrotion King Coumy, Waliihinston MARK W. STIEFEL, P.E. CONSULTING • CIVIL ENGINEERING • PLANNING • PROJECT MANAGEMENT• WETLAND PERMITTING November 5, 2002 Ms. Darcy Miller B-Twelve Associates, Inc. 1103 W. Meeker Street, Suite C Kent, WA 98032 Tel: (253) 859-0515 Subject: Dear Darcy: Sandhu Property Wetland Restoration Project Code Enforcement Violation (Case #E02G0016) Earthwork Estimate Opinion Mr. Kulwant Sandhu authorized me to prepare an Engineer's Opinion of earthwork activities on his property located at 12044 SE 184th Street in King County. The Parcel numbers are 61899600320 and 6199600282. The combined site area is approximately 6.3 acres. Background Information: I reviewed the documentation you provided for my office, which included the following information. • King County Code Enforcement Violation Notice (Case #E02G0016) letter dated January 31, 2002. • DOES letter dated February 6, 2002 • Old Short Form Grading Permit (L98G0091) • Permit Application dated July 30, 2002, signed by the property owner • Affidavit for Application form dated July 30, 2002 • B-Twelve Wetland Analysis Report and Restoration Plan, dated August 5, 2002 • B-Twelve Existing Conditions Map, dated August 2002, with Kramer Survey information • I spoke with Ms. Kathy Newborn, King County Code Enforcement officer about her department's request for the applicant to submit an Engineer's Opinion of Onsite Earthwork Activities. • The Methodology, Considerations, and Limitations used in the earthwork estimate are enclosed for reference. 22312 113th AVE. S.E. KENT, WASHINGTON 98031-2651 TEL: (253) 854-7472 CELL: (206) 300-5853 FAX: (253) 854-1575 EMAIL: sliefel@integrityol.com Ms. Darcy Miller B-Twelve Associates, Inc. November 5, 2002 Page2 Site Visit Documentation: On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, I conducted a site investigation of the subject property to develop an Engineer's Opinion of Onsite Earthwork Activities in support of the Application for a Restoration Plan. During the visit, I observed the B-Twelve wetland flags that were reestablished on September 16, 2002. The wetland edge, 50-foot buffers, and approximate limits of prior clearing and earthwork appeared consistent with the Existing Conditions Map provided, with the exception of the southerly extent of clearing limits. Engineer's Opinion of Earthwork Volumes: 1. The Engineer's Opinion is that approximately 200 to 250 cubic yards of earthwork activity occurred within the 50-foot wetland buffer areas, as flagged in the field and identified on the preliminary site map. The disturbance appeared to include a combination of imported fill and grading. 2. It is also the Engineer's Opinion that the initial permitted fill (L98G0091), together with subsequent fill and grading activity resulted in at least 450 cubic yards of earthwork on the subject site outside the wetland buffer area. Limitations: This letter of opinion was prepared for the applicant's use in the permit for resolving the current Code Enforcement Violation (Case #E02G0016). The methods and limitations discussed herein were provided after consultation with the Code Enforcement Officer, the Owner, and B-Twelve Associates, Inc. The intent of this analysis and Opinion is to provide the King County Code Enforcement Section with supplemental technical information to assist in the determination of what permit process and additional documentation may be required to complete the permit process and remedy the land use violation. This opinion letter was provided for the exclusive use of the property owner in accordance with a generally accepted level of service within the local engineering consulting community at this time. No other expressed or implied usage of this letter opinion is intended. Ms. Darcy Miller B-Twelve Associates, Inc. November 5, 2002 Page 3 Should the King County Code Enforcement Section or the property owner desire to obtain a more accurate estimate of prior earthwork activities, then a more detailed topographic survey, limited soil investigation and more complex analysis would be required. However, given the extensive onsite ground disturbances, the level of accuracy obtained from more detailed measurement and analysis would also result in a range of probable earthwork volumes. I appreciate the opportunity to provide this limited opm10n letter on behalf of the Applicant and property owner Mr. Kulwant Sandhu. Should any of the parties have questions, please feel free to contact me at (253) 854-7472. Sincerely, Enclosure: Methodology, Considerations, and Limitations in Estimating Earthwork Cc: Mr. Kulwant Sandhu, Applicant MWS/mws C:\winword\22802 Sandhu\22802 Earthwork Opinion Letter Sandhu Property Wetland Restoration Project Code Enforcement Violation (Case #E02G0016) Earthwork Estimate Opinion Methodology: The following steps were taken to prepare this Engineer's Opinion of Earthwork Volume I. A SO-foot grid was laid out on the Existing Conditions Map (Map) for the westerly 3 00 feet of the site 2. A 25-foot grid was laid out on the Existing Conditions Map for the easterly 200 feet of the site. 3. At each of the grid comers shown on the Map, the engineer estimated the approximate depth of fill, based upon visual observation of adjacent ground lines and limited probing of the site soils. Notations were made on the worksheet regarding specific fill pile locations. 4. The approximate limits of fill and/or earthwork and clearing were compared to the Map documentation. 5. The average fill depth for each grid section was computed by adding the grid comer elevations and dividing for four ( 4). The average fill depth was indicated on the worksheet in a circle with a plus ( +) symbol. 6. The average fill volume for each westerly grid section was computed by multiplying the average fill depth (feet) by the grid area (50'*50') and dividing by 27 to convert to in place cubic yards. The fill volume for each grid section was indicated on tie map in a rectangle. 7. The average fill volume for each easterly grid section was computed by multiplying the average fill depth (feet) by the grid area (25' *25 ') and dividing by 27 to convert to in place cubic yards. The fill volume for each grid section was indicated on the map in a rectangle. 8. A rough estimate comparison was made of the rough volume of earthwork if a uniform one-foot deep layer of fill were placed over the westerly 300-foot by 200- foot grid area. The volume was computed to be approximately 2,222 cubic yards. Sandhu Property Wetland Restoration Project Code Enforcement Violation (Case #E02G0016) Earthwork Estimate Opinion Considerations and Limitations in Estimating Earthwork: • No pre-earthwork topographic survey information was available for the subject site according to the applicant and B-Twelve Associates, Inc. • No post disturbance topographic survey information was available for use m computing earthwork volumes according to standard engineering procedures. The property owner did not have written documentation of the amounts of fill material placed under the original 1998 Grading Permit #(L98G009 l ). No truck tickets, weigh bills, or inspection records are available to verify the original fill and grading activities. • A vegetative covering over the prior fill area and recently disturbed areas makes it more difficult to visually estimate what the original ground elevations and contours may have been prior to fill placement and subsequent grading. • Using visual estimates of probable fill depth is subjective, within a level of accuracy of about one to two feet (l' to 1.5'). Using a fifty-foot grid layout to estimate average fill depths also introduces reasonable variation in subsequent calculations. (If an average one-foot (l ') depth of fill material were placed within the 1.4-acre disturbed area, the resulting fill volume would be 2,222 cubic yards.) Therefore, the potential level of accuracy in visual estimating could be plus or minus 2,200 to 3,300 cubic yards. • Extending the grid layout beyond the indicated limits of clearing on the Map also introduces a degree of variation in subsequent calculations. Sent by: AAA WASHINGTON 4256462191 i 11/18/02 4:16PM;Jetfax._#593;Page 2/2 king County Road Service, DJvb.ion IJ=p;,nmem eif 'l'r•m,1,or1.i110,1 201 Soulh Ji:iclc.:io.1 SL1ii:c:1 Seattle, Wilt. YIID4•38GG TYPE OF CERTIFICATE 1:81 ORIGINAL 0 CONDITIONAL October 1 $, 2002 Certificate # 01443 File Number: D2·10-D7-02 Exnires: October 15 2003 CERTIFICATE OF TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY 0 Specific ccndi1ions are described on 1he reverse •idc of this ccrrificate. Pursuont to King County Code, Chapter 14.70 as amended, 1hi, ccrrifica1e confirms that the level of service standard used in the Transportation Concurrency Management program has been slllisfied and sufficient road capacity i• reserved for the developmcn1 project described below. IMPORTANT: This certificate doos not guaranlee a developmcnl permit. Olhcr trai,sponation improvements and mitigation will be required to comply with Intersection Standards, Mirigation Payment System. King County road stwulard,, lllldlor safety needs. l. Applican, Name and Addrc•.: Kulwant Sandhu, 13989 SE 159th Place, Renton, WA 2. Property Location: a. Propeny Address: 12044 SE 184th Ph1ce b. Dcvelop,nem Name: Sandhu Development c, P•rccl Nwnber: 6199600320 3. Type of Development Permit To Be Requested: Formal Plat 4. Prupoocd Land Use: Single Family Residential 5. Zone Location and Reserved Unl!S! a. Concum,ncy Zone: 798 Community Plmning Area: Soos Creek i. Commercial Projoct -Total Square Feel! 0 ii. Mult~wnlly • Number of Units: 0 Iii. Sinilc family-Number of Units: 20 6. This Ccnificate is subjoct to tho following general condition,: a. This Ccniticato of Concurrency runs with the land and is transferable only 10 subsequent owners oflhe same property for the Slated development, subject to the term,, condilion., and expiration date listed herein. 'lltill Certificate of Concurrency is not transferable to any other properly and has no commercial value. This Certificate Expires: October 15, 2003 unless you apply for the dcvek>pmcnt permit described above, i,riorto that dale. If this requirement is not mot the King County Department ofTransportatiOll reserves the option ta cancel your cc:rtificarn and capacity rescrvadon. When you apply for a developmtnt pcrmll witb Kl~ Counly'• O.partmen1 of Dovolopmonl and En,ironmcntal Services (DDE.~). bring this Cortinca10 or Transportution Concurrency a, part or lh• developmont appli<alion package. If yon ha'" any quc.1ions, please HII (206) 2o~722- Linda Dougherty, Monogor, Roads...,,;.,.., Div""'" Department of Transpottilhon King Counly, Willjhinsto11 Sent by: AAA WASHINGTON 4256462191; 11/18/02 4:16PM;Jetfall._#593;Page 2/2 King Councy Road Scrvicet DJVUijon IJep;,nment o!' ·1·nm.,,oru1tlor1 ZOJ $~t11)J.:1c1<.:io,1St1-1 Scat1le, WA 911~·3851> TYPE OF CERTIFICATE l8J ORIGINAL 0 CONDITIONAL October 15, 2002 Certificate # 01443 File Number: D2-10-D7-02 Exnires: October u 2003 CERTIFICATE OF TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY 0 Specific condi1ions are describ.d on the reverse •iilc of this ccrtitica1e. Pursuant ta King Counry Code, Chapter l4. 70 as amended, this ccniflcate confinn, that the level ol'ser.icc standard used in the Transportation Concurrency Management proyram has been s111isCicd and sufficient road capacity i• reserved for the deselopmcnl project described below. IMPORTANT: This ccrtilicatc docs not guaranlec a de>elopmcnl permit. Olhcr 1ran•pnrta1ion irnprovemenlS and mitigation will be required to comply with Intersection Standards, Mitigation Payment Syste1n. King County road slamlards, lllldior safe1y needs. I. Applicant Name and Addre,s: Kulwant Sandhu, 13989 SE 159th Place, Renton, WA 2. Property Location: a. Property Address, 12044 SE 184th PIIIQI b. Dcveloprnen1 Name: Sandhu Development c. P=cl Nwnber: 6199600320 3. Type of Development Permit To Be Requested: Formal Plat 4. Proposed Land Use: Single Family Residential 5. Zone Location and Reserved Units: a. Concumncy Zone: 798 Community Planning Area: So011 Creek i. Commercial Project-Total Square Feet: 0 ii. Mult~family -Number of Units: 0 iii. Sin~• family-Nuinl><:r of Units: 20 6. This Certificate i• subject to the following general condition,: a. This Ceniticlt!e of Concurroncy runs with the land and is transforable only 10 subsequent owners oflhe same properly for the stated development, subject to the term.,, condilions and expiration dare listed herein. This Certificate ofConcurrenc'Y is not transferable to 1111y other property and has no commercial value. This Certificate Expires: October 15, 2003 unless you apply for the development permit describod above, prior to that dale. If this roquiremeni is not met tho Kjng County Department ofTnmsportation reser\les Lhe option to cancel your certificate and capacily reservation. Wh,n you apply for I developmtnl permllwitll KlngCounly'., 0.partment or Dcvolopm,nl and E•viroomcnt•l Services (DDES), bring this Certineato or Transporution Concurnncy as pan or tho development 1pplitoli•n packa:e.. If you han any q,...1ion1, please call (206) 26.l-4712. I .inc.la Oough~rty, M,:magi:r. Road S~rvic~ Divis1on De()artmenl ofTransportiltion King County, Washington November 19, 2002 Ms. Kathy Newborn King County DDES Land Use Services Division 900 Oaksdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Re: Sandhu Property B-twelve Job #A2-125 King County No. E02G0016 Dear Kathy, B-twelve Associates, Inc. 1103 W. Meeker St. Kent, WA 98032-5751 (v) 253-859-0515 (ij 253-852-4732 (e) info@b12assoc.com Per Mr. Sandhu's request, we are submitting the following pieces of information for the Grading Permit Application. Please be aware that the client is preparing a preliminary site plan for development of the site. He will be applying for a voluntary Pre-application Meeting with King County within the next few weeks. He has obtained a Certification of Transportation Concurrency that will expire in less than one year. (See attached.) We are in the process of delineating the remainder of the wetland edges onsite. A surveyor has been contracted to locate those flags and complete a full topographic survey. 1. Application worksheet-See attached. 2. Grading Plan-Applicant will present a final grading plan and drainage plan in association with the development proposal. We are currently coordinating this process with K.C.D.D.E.S., Land Use Section. We believe that regrading the site only once will have less overall impact on resources and sensitive areas. 3. Environmental Checklist-See attached letter from engineer, which states that the amount of disturbance within sensitive area buffers is approximately 200-250 cubic yards. Therefore, it does not appear that SEPA should be required for the sensitive areas -violation. Please note that the SEP A Checklist will be completed for the development proposal. Thus, the grading that has already occurred outside of the sensitive areas will be covered under SEPA. 4. Quantity Calculations-See attached letter by Mark Stiefel, P.E. 5. Drainage Plan-See attached Sheet W-1, which shows that silt fencing will be installed along the limits of disturbance. Nearly all of the disturbed areas on the site are , Re: Sandhu Property King Co. No.£02G0016 IB-twelve Job #A2-125 B-twelve Associates November 19, 2002 Page 2 of2 currently stabilized with straw and/or grasses; however, areas still uncovered will be mulched within the next 2 weeks. Please note that a detailed Drainage Plan will be completed during the development process. 6: Wetlands/Stream Report-See attached. 7. Certification of Applicant Status-See attached. 8. Estimated Application Fees-See attached. We have subtracted the SEPA fee of $792 from the amount submitted to the County, because we do not believe SEPA is necessary at this point in time. (See engineer's letter.) 9. Affidavit for Application Form-See attached. 10. Other: Certificate for Transportation Concurrency-See attached certificate. The applicant will use this information for the development proposal. Please feel free to call our office if you have any questions regarding this request for a Grading Permit. Sincerely, B-twelve Associates ··•·. 7 •)/) ;// !;h.GC,C:J /5 ; //!,[£~<..___ Darcey B...Miller Wetland Ecologist File: dmlA2125-KCcover.doc ® King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 (206) 296-6600 TTY (206) 296-7217 Alternative formats available upon request Drop-Off Cover Sheet for Land Use Services Division *******•**"'*"'**"**"'********"' IMPORT ANT *******"******"'*******"****** PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME IS NECESSARY FOR ALL DROP-OFFS ,.i-.: Project No.: f' ·. ! ~: "'. C :.; ' ;."t Date Received by LUSD · :_·-... ...,· ,, t• • -). ,-··' · ~t_;·) ;,-.-··o('-i"'-J ~·. :;~:tNamku ,~[~~-~-:c~h iz~-~ 4 . Company Name I Contact Person [D)~(G~!w~rrn lf1l NOV 2 0 2002 L::-; '•:._Telephone No. ·/12£-q ~£-72-1<> ( ~ • To ka .\-b~ /'.' e 1w b (,I t n K.C. D.D.E.S. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY KING COUNTY STAFF (please print) Short Plat/ Plats Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Lot Line Adjustment Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Right of Way Permit Please specify item(s) dropped-off: Clearing / Grading Permit Additional information requested; please specify item(s) dropped-off: Other:--------------------------------------- PLEASE NOTE: All drop-off item(s) will be logged into the computer under the project number, therefore, it is important that the top portion of this form is completed properly before you drop-off anything. Assistance in finding a project number can be provided by speaking to a Land Use Services Division Person of the Day (POD) or the Zoning/Land Use Technician. Your cooperation is important. Thank you. LUSO Drop-Off Cover Sheet lg-cvs-dropoff.pdf 05-30-2002 Page 1 of 1 :" RCP i_=43183 '\.....---------------~-----=~---- '7 ~~~-~~::::==-=========---------------------------·------------------ ------ t -'b u-' o:'. G1 --~ ----L ----·z --428 - PLANTING LIST QNTY SIZE SPACING --------- PLANT NAME SI-RU3S Oceonsproy ------ I I B! °1(\:l I r.o :~ I 4 30 1-------- _/ st _, • 0J l'0 set L!J [\ < U) 1'0 • • ' ' ; ------- / ,. / ' ) j ASPHALT B E~~t_NT .. 12" RCP • CORNFR IN \/\/ATER (NOT SET) ALL DEBRIS TO BE REMOVED•~ FROM WETLAND BlFFERS \ \ - • ,-,---; 343.25' (CALC'D.) 34 3.34' (PL/\ T) IT] j I I I I I I I SHED • ' ' I I \ I I I \ I I \ WETLA~ID DIRT PILES & AFFECTED BUFFER AREAS,-~ TO BE RES'l"ORED TO ORIGINAL CONTOURS (APPROX.) P R ENGINEERJNG PLANS ( (n/ ( {;:I ' ' ' .. 12" RCP , I.E.=421.08 ' I ' ,' :VJ qi v I ' '--t--------· I " 504.06' (CALC'D.) " --I I '~ j I ASPHALT PA 1/EMENT , ' " ~ I I 'I ; I ' ' I S.E. 184 TH STREET ' " I 0 I ' I I , \ \ \ I c4z5_.- A 187,9120 SO. FT. (4.310 ACRES) ?60.82' (CALC'D.) 4 0 15 30 45 60 SCALE: 1· • 30' X;---X--X \ FOUND 2" IRON PIPE r70i!7.0R3 •Gs~o~UT~H~8.-;-~<0~.0';--;-1 ,c--cvcc:VE=s-T __ ___,/ OF CALC'D. PROPERTY CORNt_R ASPHALT PA\/EMFNT I I I I I I I I \ Holodiscus discolor 5 gal. as shown 19 © i8 i2 Pacific Nlnebork Physocarpus capitarus 24-36" as shown l\botka Rose Rosa nutkana 24-36" as shown 0 18 Thlrrbleberry Rubus pa,vHlorus 8lffER AREA SEED MX (Ali bJffer creas dtsll.rbed ru-Tng oonst.) 25% Redtop Bentgrass A_grostos alba 25% l"ereml\ll ~ 25%~~sf~ ru! Festvca idahoensis c;;% Rea Fescue "'"_E1estuci) rub(!J,,/ =llng rote: -'W 1000 sq. feet AREAS OF vVETLAt-0/8\.FFER MfITGATION, INCl..l.DING CLEAN.P, REGARDING, SEEDING AN) PUWllNG. (15,453 SF TOT AL) SPLIT RAIL FENCE SFNSITM: AREA SIGN 2 gal. NOTES: 1. BASE SURVEY INFO'l\MTION PROVIDED BY CR.llJVER NORTHWEST. 2. GRADING INFORMATION PROVIDED BY Sllfra ~. 3. ALL REGWJED ANJ/CR 011-ER BARE /Jf/EAS TO BE - SEE!EJ WITH GRAS, $-ED MX SPECIF JED ON n-«S PLAN. 4. SEE ENGlNEERil\G PLANS FOR &:lUARE FOOT AGE OF MJTIGA TION AN) RE--GRJ>DING Afi£AS. FENCE DETAIL Bolled & burlapped or conta1nerized pranr as specified. Cut & remove burlap from top 1/2 of ball lburlop to be rottoble) as shown 2 1/2" 1r.1n. f"'ulch or sterile straw fir spring 2lanting. wood chos for fall planting. ' Top soil IIOT TO ICAl.ii SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL Wf.Tl,,\Nll SIG'l l\OTLS 12" x HI" ..\J.umiuum olgu »iLh white r~fledive backgruum\. AU..ch tu !I' ~ ":i:4" cedar ur prem1re treated po1t with 5116" x3" fag bolt. Sctposl lniuiwu,u 3' beluw griule. Wetb11d sign to sit at apprn~intately 5' height aftm·" llni,h !{rn!lc. The wdlam!forcmn sign shall he J?USted al !be buumlarv hetweeu the Swsith·• Area Buffer, Siitllack ,\rea or Setback 'frnct and the Buil,\i.ug S.tback Arca. 'NETLAND SIGN DETAIL NOT TO $CALE r-----~--- BYci:!~~ JyC SENl, AREA REVIEW DAJE d':'E I, 2-00-3 IL--Ebtwelve Associates, Inc. 1103 West Meeker Street Kent, Wa 98032-5751 253-859-0515 Fax 253-852-4732 -EL=423.58 12" MFTAL Ji'' ~'fl1x~'.ci~'°;------------------~\'k:;;:;:--s\.,f/,[\t\'Y'n;,_ ____________ _;_I -------------------------------- <.,. rY "'\ (/) z 0 ...... (/) ...... > w 0::: <] <] <] <] Job No. A2-i25 Designed By: Dfv1 Drawn By: CM.. Checked by: ---- Date: J.N:; 2003 SHEET W-1 OF • w • U) w :J z w > <( I I- 0 C'\J ...... -:a: Cf) w -"' Ol SI: 00 "' '° ~ -f- :5 !l. -" (0 OJ ~ ~ -Cf) <( w :a: -"' "H- 00 "' '° ~ w f., :,- '° '° ' ~ 0 z 30' p~ (,) <( _J _J <( !l. (,) -:--' g (0 . Ol O a; "' " ~ ~ -i------------ C) 0 .g ~ --------------- LOT4 S88°05'34"E 517.58' (CALC'D 99. 711CAtC'D.r30o:ocr(DEE!T8.PtJl,Tf--------·---1 -2.9g_77• (CALC'D.) 300.00 (DEED & Pc/\T)------ LOT5 4' HIGH WIRE FENCE IS 0.9' EAST OF PROPERTY LINE LOT6 4' HIGH WIRE FENCE IS 2.3' EAST OF PROPERTY LINE 4' HIGH WIRE FENCE CORNER IS 0.52' NORTH & 0.85' WEST OF PROPERTY CORNER 299.92' (CALC'O.) 300.00' (PLAT) " ~ N <') " w "' '° "' <') ' ~ 0 z 0 o,'0 l/ ·' I I • I I• I i ~ ;:li a;, 0 ~ I~ I~ (,) I~ -f., 0 [;j 4' HIGH BARBED-WIRE FENCE CORNER IS 0.2' EAST OF PROPERTY LINE & CONTINUES WESTERLY 4' HIGH WIRE FENCE CORNER IS 0.66' SOUTH & 1.51' EAST OF PROPERTY CORNER & CONTINUES WESTERLY + 518.01' (PLAT) c------______ 21_7.81JCALC'O ) ---'---------- \\/; 'A& • • • \\/; •• • • \\/ 1 \.\I; \\/1 • • • ... -- \\/1 \\/ I WETLAND A/B/C 3 CLEARED/GRADED AREA (TO BE RESTORED) \\!, CORNER IN WATER '• ""' .. ., I ......... . ... -.. • • -. ••A .... -, ~ • -.., • • -.-i-.. • • • •-. • • -• .... •A• A•••••-. ,0-. LOT? 85,292+ SQ. FT. (1.96+ ACRE) STEEL SHED SHED APPROX. LOCATION EXJST, HOUSE EXISTING TRAIL (APPROX.) "'-fl PP ROX. LOCATIONS • • • \ ---T 260.12' (CACC'ou=i-.J===--=--==t-==::::=~-=== WElLAND EDGE (APPR(i)s(Q 1 F 4' HIGH BARBED-WIRE FENCE OUTH & 0.61' WEST OF'---~----\~ BONNEVILLE TRANSMISSION LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY (SEATTLE/COVINGTON TRANSMISSION LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY PER REFERENCE SURVEY) 187,912± SQ. FT. (4.31± ACRES) WETL.AJ\D A/8/C • • • ..... 2 B 6 _/ +---B 7 \II, \ 11 r-EXISTING TRAIL (APPROX,) \\/; 5 WETLAND A/8/C ~ \ .,. ..... ,, ..... ..... _.,. --..... _ ------........... -_,,... NOTE: NOTE: ., l SCALE: i • = 40' BA$E SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CRAMER NORTHWEST, NOT ALL FEATURES SHOWN ON MAP WERE SURVEYED, A J5' BUILDING SETBACK UNE MEASURED FROM THE BUFFER EDGE IS ALSO REQUIRED IF DEVELOPMENT IS PROPOSED, NOTE: ALL DISTLRBED AREAS WILL BE RESEEDED WITH THE FOLLOWING MIX: \ r-t.XISTING TRAIL (APPROX.) / / / / I 25% Recft91> ~ass __ AJJrostos alba · -25,: Peroool Rve Elytpus cmfiri:Js 25% laaio rescue Festuca idahoensis 25% Rod Fescue Seedizj'i'iife':"b~/1000 sq. feet ------_ ------END OF 4' HIGH BARBED.WIRE FENCE · 343.25' (CA],.C'O.) 343.34' (PLAT) PROPERTY CORNER IS 192' NORTH & 0.75' WEST OF !jii-------~k;=+:~===i==-- . "'. ---,+ 1-.-, "'+--:+=====--=+-=="=-~c-=-=±=--~·-----+-(BEGIN426 ~'!j~(:!~{e1l!ffJ ----- 681j,2' (ESM) 682.04' (PLAT) -END OF 4' HIGH CHAINLINK FENCE IS 0.61' SOUTH --604.06' (~LC'D.) -~-~=-_.,,;_~-~="-~~=-c==-====c...=-==~ & 59.61' EAST OF PROPERTY CORNER ."' ---------- + 0. ------------------ N88'02'39"W 2060.25' (ESM) (BASIS OF BEARINGS) ---------------- ----------- S.E. 184TH STREET G. It! '""''"° "-'·""''"le,"1\2-12~-i.anon<JVl2 126-HC<Jllc/ vr;n fl/5/2<J02 65.21' -----if'--- / --------- ---_. ' T --------------------- ----- sAsE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CRAMER NORTHWEST ' B-twelve Associates, Inc. 1103Westl~eekerStreet Kent, Wa 98032-6751 263·869-0616 Fax 253-862-4732 if) z 0 -if) -> w 0::: <] <] <] <] Job No. A2-i25 Designed By: DM Drawn By: Chooked by: Date: SHEET OF CML AUGUST 2002 W-i I ' I ' ' I -:,; (/) w -"' "' .,. '° N "' ~ -f- • :5 w 0.. -• (/) ;,. <!) w '° N "' ::::, ~ -z (/) <( w w > :,; - <( io "!+ '° I N "' I-~ w 0 • r-- N :'.' "' ..... "' 0 ~ 0 z 30' --- 0 o.,'0 -- -~~ ~~ i (ii LOT 4 S88"05'34"E 517.58' (CALC'D. 4' HIGH BARBED-WIRE FENCE CORNER IS 0.2' EAST OF PROPERTY LINE & CONTINUES WESTERLY 4' HIGH I/VIRE FENCE CORNER IS 0.66' SOUTH & 1.51' EAST OF PROPERTY CORNER & CONTINUES WESTERLY 518.01' (PLAT) + --26072' ( CALC'D.) -- WE-[LAND F 4' HIGH BARBED-WIRE FENCE EDGE (APPR~Q.17 OUTH & 0.61' WEST OF .-------------H BONNEVILLE TRANSMISSION LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY (SEATTLE/COVINGTON TRANSMISSION LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY PER REFERENCE SURVEY) 187,912± SQ. FT (4.31 ± ACRES) ---.... i 1 \.\/; ' 1 r-i:.XISTING TRAIL (APPROX,) \ 9.17' (CALC'D.f300.00' (DEE!J&t='D';'fJ------------,""',-------_______ 21_7.81.JCALC'D. J ---'---------- \ -299.11 (CALC'D.J 300:00' (DEED & PL'IT)-------- LOT5 4' HIGH WIRE FENCE IS 0.9' EAST OF PROPERTY LINE 0 o.,'0 I I I ',\II \\/; \\{; • • ' \.\/1 • • • \\/1 \\!; \\/; \\/1 3 \\/; \\/; CORNER \.\ I I IN WATER \\,/ G WETLAND A/B/C ~~~ \\/1 \\/; _,_ _,_ 't,, \\!; ~ '<;:!. '"' . \\/; \1/1 8 o. ~ A 9 ~ A6 r-o;,, ~ WETLAND A/B/C ~ "\) ;--........___ DP#2 A 4 ~ A7 ~ t% it~ A+i1_-,A12, ~ t?~ '-' DP fi,3 A 10 I !::, A 2 .... · · · · · · -....... _. ___ . ·+. _ }~\ .. ·;_:_·_:_-_:_· · · · · · · · ........ +-.... · · ·.....• A~ &. •• DP #1 ->-' ----··.. . ... -··· ?\l..f ' • • A 0 ,111 A 3/ . TA 11 IA 16 / r E 1 A 15 ' I :' CLEAFW/GRADED : AREA : (TO ~ RESTORED) I.,,,...----- ' I $CALE: 1" = 40' \ 299.82' (CALC'D.) 300.00' (DEED) • ,..4 _ __....,. ', ••.•.. •. I)\~ ... r---------------------------------f· .::'~:,....,.=:-::-~=-:=--±;~~,.....~~-~=-;:===-==~±J~~)_ ______ _\ , ..... _ .. -··w 3 ' r4...... --.. ·· -' . -------261. 6'(CALC'D.)261.52'(PLAT) ', :·' CHANNEL IN NOTE: BA$E SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CRAMER NORTHWEST, NOT ALL FEATURES SHOWN ON MAP WERE SURVEYED. NOTE: A 15' BUILDING SETBACK LINE MEASURED FROM THE BUFFER EDGE IS ALSO REQUIRED IF DEVELOPMENT IS PROPOSED. LOT6 4' HIGH WIRE FENCE IS 2.3' EAST OF PROPERTY LINE 4' HIGH WIRE FENCE CORNER IS 0.52' NORTH & 0.85' WEST OF PROPERTY CORNER ;,. ~ N "' .,. w co £') N "' ' ~ 0 z I I ' l l I, I ! I~ '.-:ii 0.:' ~ 0 N '° I~ Ip 0 ..J 1(3 -r-- 0 N '° 11 11 I ' • ' • • • '-APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF AN AREA NOT CLEARED CLEARED/GRADED AREA (TO BE RESTORED) LOT 7 85,292+ SQ. FT. (1.96+ ACRE) .t\PPROX, LOCATION EXIST. HOUSE STEEL S1-£D St-ED ... . . . . . EXISTING TRAil (APPROX.) ROX. LOCATIONS 299.92' (CALC'O.J 300.00' (PLAT) ·----------------'..::.:.=2-=:=_"_'::':'.''. ____________ ---4~===-343.25' (CALC'O.J 343.34' (PLAT) --~~~====1~.--~-~-,~~·~=== -------------------------------- 681J,2' (ESMJ 682.04' (PLAT) END OF 4' HIGH CHAINLINK FENCE IS 0.61' SOUTH & 59.61' EAST OF PROPERTY CORNER ----------------+ • ' ' • • ' EDGE ' '> , : WETLAND OF / CLEARING / / W (TYP,) / I .... /~ Se• B2 :' I : I B 3 C,3 E4 r---r:- 0E5~2 Ci \ NOTE: ALL DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE RESEEDED WITH THE FOLLOWING MIX: 25%Redtop~ "--·-~· rostos alba . . , .25l': eremTol Rve lyrpus cmeras 25" la<ro f'i,'f.'fo 25~FR~F~ensis s.edt,ZJ'liiife\"b~/1000 sq, feel , I .L_ , : \\ B 4 ~B 5 .·t ' I WETLAND A/B/C XISTING TRAIL (APPROX.) ·~ / / I ) .... 604.06' _/ B 67+--B 7 6?..,5 ..... ----- B6 -- .,..,. .,. ....... / _.,. / / I -' ....... ~ -----E -_ _ _ --ND OF 4' HIGH BARBED-WIRE FENCE · ------ (~LC'D.) PROPERTY CORNER IS 1.92' NORTH & 0.75' WEST OF \ \ (BEGIN 4;fe~1!!zlli'/'!)S.ceii±fj=J ~ --=~~=·=-=....c=-==~ .,.,, 0. 65.21' N88'02'39"W 2060.25' (ESMJ (BASIS OF BEARINGS) -------------------------"-------+ --------1- S.E. 184TH STREET ;,t---- / ------·---------------------- B4SE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CRAIi/ER NORTHWEST i 8-twelve Associates, Inc. . I 1103 West r•eker Street Kent, Wa 98032-6761 263-869-0616 Fax 253-862-4732 Cf) z 0 ...... Cf) ...... > w O:'. <J <J <J <J 0..C oO >-~0-1--C 0:::: •-w U)_c C U) o...oo o~> 0:::: u > 0... C ~ 0 >, :::) u 1= I 01 ::i OcO z,-U <[ +-' U) .U) CJ) xc w~ Job No. A2-125 Designod By: _D-M __ Drawn By: Checked by: Date: SHEET OF CM. AUGUST 2002 W-1