Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA-08-139_Misc
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 701 FIFTH AYENUE,#3400, SEATTLE, WA 98104 Order No.: 001273252 PROPERTY ADDRESS: RENTON, WASHINGTON Your No.: J & M LAND DEY ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS 33915 1ST WAY S SUITE 200 FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98003 ATTN: ANDY CAMPBELL 1/1 REtE-WED OCI 1 I) 100B ESM Enclosed are your materials on the above transaction, If you have any questions regtuding these materials, please contact us, Thank YOll for this opportunity to serve you «<c««««««<c«««««««c««»»»»»»»»>»»»»»»»»»»> TITlE UNIT 6 TElEPHONE: (206) 628·5610 IOn FREE: (800) 627·0530 FAX: (206) 628·9717 DARYl SA VlDIS DAVID P CAMPBEll KEITH EISENB REY MIKE HARRIS SENIOR TITlE OFFICER AND UNIT MANAGER (E-MAIL: DARYL SAVIDIS@CTT COM) SENIOR TITLE OFFICER (E-MAII: DAVID CAMPBELl@CTTCOM) TinE OfFICER (E-MAIl: KEITH EISENBREY@CTTCOM) TffiEOFFlCER (E-MAI!: MICHAEL HARRlS@CTTCOM) ««««««««««««««««««<»»»»»»»»>»»»»»»»»»»> rm,I!lIl/RDA/[Q9() r 'j:AGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 7,,-_lFTHAVENUE,#3400,SEAHLE, WA 9310<1 PLAT CERTIFICATE Certifioate for Filing Proposed Plat: Order No.: 1273252 In the matter of the plat submitted [or our appIoval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of KING County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies tlmt the title to the following described land situate in said KING County, to-wit: SEE SCHEDULE A (NEXT PAGE) VESTED IN: J & M LAND DEVELOPMENT, INC. EXCEPTIONS: SEE SCHEDULE B ATTACHED CHARGE: $200.00 TAX: $18.00 Records examined to OCTOBER 10, 2008 at 8,00 AM By DARYL SAVIDIS Title Offioer (206)628-5610 PLATCRrA/RDA/~ .. ':IICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPAN' PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION Order No: 1273252 LOTS 2 AND 3, KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NUMBER 675015, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7509050645, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON EXCEPT THE MOBI LE HOME LOCATED THEREON I'lATCRn/FDA/f.'f:'JW CHJ['.AGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PUT CERTIFlCATE SCHEDULEB Order No.: 1273252 This certificate does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the foUowing exceptions: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matlers, if any, created, fust appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this CommitmenL R Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records C Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises D. Easements or chUms of casements DOt shown by the public records. E. Any lien, or right to lien, for contributions to employee benefit funds, Or for state workerst compensation, or for services, Jabor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished j all as imposed by Jaw, and not shown by the public records. F. Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. G.. Any senricc, installation, connectioD, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, e]ectricity or garbage removal. H. General taxes not now payable; matters relating to special assessments and speciallevie.s, if any, preceding Or in the same becoming a lien. I. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereo!; Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. J Water rights, claims, or title to water. K. THIS REP ORTIS ISSUED AND ACCEPTED UPON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS($100()OO). I"'LATCR.TD/RDA/09$9 '-HCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPAN' PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS Order No: 1273252 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF, GRANTEE, PURPOSE, AREA AFFECTED, RECORDED, RECORDING NUMBER, PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION ~~D/OR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS CONSTRUCTED AUGUST 25, 1963 5615528 2. EASEMENT ru,D THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF, GRANTEE, PURPOSE, AREA AFFECTED, RECORDED, RECORDING NUMBER, CHARLES G. RATZSCH AND BETTY L RATZSCH, HIS WIFE SEPTIC DRAINAGE LINES WESTERLY PORTION OF LOT 3 DECEMBER 12, 1980 8012120768 3 EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF, GRANTEE, PURPOSE, AREA AFFECTED, RECORDED, RECORDING NUMBER, AFFE:CTS, LOT 2 RIDGEVIEW COURT, LLC TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION PORTION OF SAID PREMISES OCTOBER II, 2005 20051011002754 4 EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF, GRANTEE' PURPOSE, AREA AFFECTED, RECORDED, RECORDING NUMBER, AFFECTS, LOT 3 RIDGEVIEW COURT, LLC TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION PORTION OF SAID PREMISES OCTOBER 11, 2005 20051011002755 5. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS, NOTES, DEDICATIONS AND SETBACKS, IF ANY, SET FORTH IN OR DELINEATED ON SAID SHORT PLAT. 6 RESERVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN DEED FROM NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COI1PANY, I'LATCRTD1/PDA/r:1J99 '~lCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPAN' PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No: 1273252 RESERVING AND EXCEPTING FROM SArD LANDS SO MUCH OR SUCH PORTIONS THEREOF AS ARE OR MAY BE MINERAL U\NDS OR CONTAIN COAL OR IRON, AND ALSO THE USE AND THE RIGHT AND TITLE TO THE USE OF SUCH SURFACE GROUND AS MAY BE NECESSARY FOR GROUND OPERATIONS AND THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO SUCH RESERVED AND EXCEPTED MINERAL h~DS, INCLUDING LANDS CONTAINING COAL OR IRON, FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPLORING, DEVELOPING AND WORKING THE SAME. RECORDING NUMBER, 192430 AMENDMENT AND/OR MODIFICATION OF SAID RESERVATION, RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER, FEBRUARY 13, 1935 2841227 7. CITY OF RENTON, ORDINANCE NUMBER 4612, ESTABLISHING AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AND ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF THE CHARGE UPON CONNECTION TO THE FACILITIES, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9606210966 8. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: AND: RECORDED, RECORDING NUMBER: REGARDING: SCHNEIDER HOMES I, LLC J & M LAND DEVELOPMENT, INC, ET AL. JANUARY 4, 2008 20080104001145 BENEFICIAL DRAINAGE FACILITY EASEMENT 9. EASEMENT AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS Al~ CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN, AND: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: REGARDING: 4TH & BREMERTON, LLC, ET AL. J & M h~D DEVELOPMENT, INC. JANUARY 4, 2008 20080104001146 EASEMENT FOR STORM WATER FLOWS AND MAINTENANCE AND OTHER PROVISIONS RELATED TO EASEMENTS 10 RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON PROPERTY HERElN DESCRIBED AS GRANTED IN DEED: GRANTEE: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER, KING COUNTY JULY 31, 1975 7507310043 PtATCRilz,fRDA/1J999 mCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPAN' PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No: 1273252 11 GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON ~~Y 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) , YEAR, TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER, LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND, ASSESSED VP~UE-IMPROVEMENTS, GENERP~ & SPECIAL TAXES, AFFECTS, LOT 2 2008 152305-9193-09 2104 $ 102,000 00 $ 103,000 00 BILLED, $ 2,023_65 PAID, $ 1,011_83 UNPAID, $ 1,011_82 12_ GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON r-1AY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR {~~Ou~TS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) , YEAR, TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER, LEVY CODE, ASSESSED VALUE-h~D, ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS, GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES, AFFECTS, LOT 3 ChUMED BY, AGAINST, AMOUNT, RECORDED, RECORDING NUMBER, FOR, AFFECTS, LOT 2 2008 152305-9035-01 2104 $ 180,000 .00 $ 86,000_ 00 BILLED, $ 2,622_ 52 PAID, $ 1,311 26 UNPAID: $ 1,311-26 CITY OF RENTON JAYMARC DEVELOPMENT $ 244_61, PLUS INTEREST JANUARY 4, 2008 20080104001019 DELINQUENT UTILITY CHARGES AND PENALTIES PLATCRl3'l/nOA/rFHJ 14. LIEN, CLAIMED BY, AGAINST, AMOUNT, RECORDED, RECORDING Nill1BER, FOR, AFFECTS, LOT 3 '11CAGO TITLE lNSURANCE COMPAN' PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) CITY OF RENTON JAYMARC DEVELOPMENT Order No .. : 1273252 $ 244 61, PLUS INTEREST JANUARY 4, 2008 20080104001020 DELINQUENT UTILITY CHARGES AND PENALTIES 15 THE MOBILE HOME OR MANUFACTURED HOME (AS DEFINED IN RCW 46.04302) LOCATED OR TO BE LOCATED ON THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO LICENSING AND TITLE REGISTR~TION BY THE DEPARTMENT OP MOTOR VEHICLES PURSUANT TO RCW 46.12290. AFFECTS, LOT 2 16 THE LEG~L DESCRIPTION IN THIS CERTIFICATE IS E~SED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THE ~PPLICATION AND THE PUBLIC RECORDS ~S DEFINED IN THE POLICY TO ISSUE. PL~SE NOTIFY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMP1\NY IF THE DESCRIPTION DOES NOT CONFORM TO EXPECT~TIONS. NOTE 1, THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED .~ AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RCW 64.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT, LOTS 2 !< 3, KCSP NO. 675015, REC NO. 7509050645. END OF SCHEDULE B ~'-: ' ( '\ CHICAGO TITI,L INSURANCE COMPANY -------------------------- 701 FIFTH AVENUE, #3400, SEATILE, WA 98104 PHONE: FAX: (206)628-5610 (206)628-9717 IMPORTANT: This is not a Survey_ It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liabilit}ris assumed by reason of reliance hereon. 23215 SF 0039 KCSP 1079069 8002040734 LOT 2 212.EiJ 1.41 AC 0011 • 187.70 (PI PCLA 30'766 SF 0010 . -on KCSP 675015 7509050645 ".)!ili. LOT 2 t$U2! 0.27 AC "11:1 9193 105.99 -,. LOT 1 ~ 0 .. 4.2 AC ~ 9192 LOT a 1.59 AC 9035 UN' I . LOTI\ , WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO .J & M LAND DEVELOPMENT,INC 775 SOUTH RENTON ViLlAGE PlACE STE ns RENlON. WASHINGTON 90057 E2302162 08/01/2a67 1"':32 KING COUNTY. IJ~ 20070801000250 .. 001 TAl( stS 695.00 SRLI: $1,0:)0: flea. 00 PAGE001 (IF 001 @ CHICAGO TITlE INSURANCE COMPANY (j) STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED cti 1161834 t\ THE GRANTOR(S) CHARLES G. RATZSCH. SOLE TRUSiEE DFTHE CHARLES G. ANO BETTYLRAlZSCH fAMILY REVOCABLE LMNG TRUST, OATEOJUNE"7. 1S99,AS TO lOT 2; AND, AUCEJ KNIGHT, SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OFTHEVIOLETF BUSS REVOCABLE LMNI3'rRUST DATED JULY 13, 1999, PS TOLDT 3 for and jn consideration of TEN OOUARS AND OTHER GOOD AND VAllJAElLE CONSIDERATION in hand paid, conveys nnd warrants to J & M LAND DEVELOPMENT,INC the following described real estate :;ituated in the Counly of )(lUG State or Washinglon: LOTS 2 AND3, KING CDumv SHORT PlAT NUMBER 675015, RECOPDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 75lJ90S0545, IN KING COUNTf, WASHINGTON. SUBJECTTO: EXCEPTlONS SEl FORTH ONAnACHED EXHIBITW AND 6Y THISREFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF AS JF FUllY lNCORPDPATED H8'IE1N TnxActOl1Dt Number(s): 1523os.9193-09 AND lS23()5.903S{11 Dated: JULYza,2007 AUGEJ. KNIGHT, SUCCESSQRTRUSTEE lPB10jKlCj052006 STATE OF WASHINGTON' KING ss 20070801000250.002 COUNTY Or- I CERTIFY THAT I lQ':rOW OR HP.VE: SATISFACTORY 8VIOENCE THAT CHARLES G RATZSCH IS THE PERSON WHO APPEARED BEFORE HE, AND SAID PERSON ACI<NOWLIIDGED THAT HE SIGNED nus INSTRUHENT, ON OATH STATED lliAT HE NAS AUTHORIZED TO EX&ctrrE UtE. INS"IRUNE:NT AND ACKNONLEDGED IT AS SOl·E TRUSTEE OF THE CHARLES G AND BBTTY L RATZSCH FAMILY REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST, DATED JUNE 7. 1999 TO BE: THE FREE: AND VOLUNTARY ACT OF SUCH PARTY FOR THE USES ;..ND PURPOSE:S MENTIONED IN THE INS"rRUMENT STATE OP WASHINGTON KING ss COUNTY OF t CE:RTIFY THAT I !\NOW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THAT ALICE J KNIGHT IS THE PERSON 'l-7HO APPEARED BErOM ME, AND SAID PERSON ACKNOWLEOOED THAT SHE SIGNED THIS I NSTRUMBNT • ON DArn STATED IliAI' SHE: WAS AUlHORIZED TO EXECUT8 THE INSTRUMJ:::NT AND ACKNOWLEDGED 11 AS SUCCESSOR '!RUSTEE: OF' THE VIOL8T F. BLISS REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST CATED JULy 13, 1999 TO 'BS TIlE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT .oF SUCH PARTY fOR THE: USES AND PURPOSES MgNTIONED IN THE INSTRUMENT XOT,4.RY /I)lllO:J 20070601000250.003 CHICAGO TlUE INSURANCE COMPANY EXHIBIT A Escrow No~ ll61 B3<l &A.SEM£NT AND THE lElU4S AND CONDITIONS '[HEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: PUGET SOUND POWER & LIOHr CONP.lu~y ELECTR1C TRAN5M1SSrON AND/OR DISTRIBUTION SY51EM P.REA AFFECTED: .AS CONSTRUCT8D RECORDED: AUGOST 25, 1963 RECORDING NUMBER: 561552B E:l\SEMENT AND THE: TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRJ\NTEE: PURPOSE; AREA AFFECIED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: CHARLES G. RA TZSCH AND BETTY r.. RA1'ZSCH, HIS IU F'E SEPTIC DRAINAGE LINES NESTERLY PORTION OF LOT 3 DECEMBER 12, 1980 8012120768 EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AR'&rl. AF'FEcrED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: AFFECTS: LOT 2 RIDGEVIEW COURT I LLC TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION PORTION OP SAID PREMISES OCTOBER 11, 2005 20051011002754 EASEMENT AND THE TBRMS AND CONDITIONS ntEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFPECTED; RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: AFFECTS: LOT 3 RlOOEVIEW COURT, LLC TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION PORTION OF SAID PREMISES OCTOBER 11, Z005 20051011002755 COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, EAS~SNTS, NOTES, DEDICATIONS A}.i",[) SETBACKS, IF ANY, SET PORTH IN OR DELINEATED ON SAID SHORT Ph~r R8SERVATIONS AND EXC~PTIONS CONTAINED IN DEBD PROM NORTHERN PACIFIC AAIlJ<.OAD COMPANY: RESERVING AND EXCEPTING FROM SAID LANDS SO MUCH OR SUCH PORrIONS THEREXlF AS ARE OR MAY BE MINERAL LANDS OR CONTAIN COAL OR IRON. AND ALSO THE USE _".NO THE RIGHI' AND TITLE TO TIrE: USE OF suor SURFACE: GROUND AS M.l!.'i BE NECESSP.RY FOR GROUND OPERATIONS AND THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO SUCH RESERVED AND EXCEPTED MINERAL LANDS, INCLUDING LANDS CONTAINING COAL OR IRON, FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPLORING, DEVELOPING AND WORKING THE SAME. RECORDING NUMBER: 192430 20070601000250.004 ) CHICAGO TITlE INSURANCE COMPANY EXHIBIT A Escrow No.: 1161834 (continued) ANENDI1ENT AND/OR HOD!F"ICArION OF SAID RCSERVATION: RECORD8D: RECORDING NU~BER; FEBRUARY 13, 1935 2841227 CITY OF RENTON, ORDINANCE NUMBER 4612, ESTABLISHIllG .1\N ASSE;SSr"lENT DISTRlcr FOR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AND ESTABLISHING THE AHOUNT OF THE CH.il.RGE UPON' CONNECTION TO THE FACILITIES, RECORDED UNDeR R8CORDING NUMBER 9606210566 RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED AS GRANTED IN DEED: GRANTEE: RE:CORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: KING COUNTY JULy 31, 1975 7507310043 cxhibitclrlm 1121196 ilnd hcrf'tnaltu cal/I'd Grantor. and PUOCT SOUNO POWER II L10KT COMPA.NY, • W .. hlnlton rMpotallon, hH"!naHH call.d 'Crant ... ·· lnd _______________________ _ hofr.lnantr eallt:d ·').tarllalet', W1TNESSETH; "Thai In cOMld.ntlon ('lOr." Dollar (II) and OUiU nl .... bl. cona:ldn.tlon.l,rte.tptotwhLehL. her,by lrkno"rl~di~d, 1M lrantor hertby ,nnl11nd conve)'. 10 1M ,nnttt, III aut-tutor, aM 1. .. lln., 1M rlrlX 10 con~ITuct_ r.eonllruct, ImprQYI, r.pllr , mllrltaln and op.rat • ....-.-.lectrlc tn,n'mlnlon IJ'Id/or dllilTLbut\on line ___ COntlttlnl of pol .. or to ..... n with nee .... rr brae .. , '\lYI and utbou, CfGII- arms, Insulator., Iranamlnlon, dl.lrlbutlon And "11111 wll''', tranllorm.". t..nd other nte .. s.ry or conv!"ni~nt !aclltnu and 'Qulpmtnt over and .acro .. th. lollowlf\{ dncrlbtd land loealHi In ___ _ ______ ......:K"l"'n"'g'--________ County. 5tat. of Wuhlnr\on: "cst 1/2 or tho Sout!l 1/2 of t.lD Ilorth, •• t 1/4 or tho Ilortho •• t 1//1 of tho !:orUnrest 1/11 of Sr.oction 15. TovnsMp 23 North, Range 5 FAst, W.N., loss coftl 1.Ind minural rights and WC}st 7~ feet for road. ThO!' (l"nltr IInt' of !".ch tunsmllllion .and/or dlltrlbutlon lin! .. hall b. )otiLtlt'd as follow .. :.5 now constrlle l.;d ovor and upon tho abovlJ doscr1bod property along the li-,r;t 1:1 fl:l:!t, or as cay be rolocated by mutue.l consont. GunlU sh:r.ll havr l:ott rllht 01 u.~u. acr-on th' adjacent land .of th. rrantor In ordll'r to unci •• the Ttr:hu iTilnld by 11")11 [nI1rum.nl, Illdudlna: th, d,M to conatruet, maintain. &nd u .. I. p"U&bl, road In a eonv!"nlrnt location, wllh nPenury brldru ar.d rali", GrJinltt sh~ll naH Ih!" rlrh!, at an), Ul.d all timu. to (ut, top and/ot trim any Ind all brll.hartr .... nl.l\l. or hf'rHrlU siandini or ero\l,lni upi'n ull! land or adlacfnt land of 'he crantor which aU' or maybt \Iolll"1ln 25 __ . ____ Il!'rl vltl!C'" Uld center lInr ___ • ;lind "'lao Itlt' TIS-hi (0 Cll!, lop and/or trim :lny Irf!":'> lll'l'r. Silld hnd or ildJ,1cf'nt \;!.nd of tht cranlor which, In fllllnc:, could cnmf within _...J.....-__ ff"rt of iln} llllh~ pol~~,'O\l,l!'r~, tl)(l\lr!":I..luy~, conductor" or othH hcllltlttS oilht" gr.antft' Of In iln)' m",nnu Of' ,I. mrn~t ~ or h~t;llrd Ihrr("lo . • ;""'" ",II ,u, pi"'. co",''"'' 0' m"'"'' on, bo.Id.", 0' olh" "ro"o" _1Ih1. 10 /,,1 III ~·lIrt, ~nlrr IlII~ Jlld ... h~lI du no bl~~lln, .... h,u:';orvror '!I.'IIMn:a. dlsl.ance:Jf JOO I!"rl from s;ild nne vnl~ss rr"","lLJhh' 1' •• ,,,,' IhC"lt'IIIl\J5 b~!"n ILrsl IIVNII~ ,T;lnlf'(" lR .... ,rllln!!:. Th,· rlKhl-"'<'Trtll ~:'.lnlrd to lhf' gr.1nt~f' shall c:ontIr'I;Uf' In lorclt until such tlmt' &5lhe "ranlee, Us ~u\ \ .... !\,lrl-,or 1"'>IKII~_ :-h.111 complf"lrlr rltmovt 11:1. slrllclurrs <lind "lulpfnl"'nl frum 5:lld Jil.nd ur )M.tl n'ht'T\Io.IM' l'f'rmJnfnTl) ,Jbil.r:-1"lIllh(' 5Amr, I.!PDh 511Ch remD ... d or lIlb:a.ndQnmenl all rllhI.s ht"rf'by cranlC'd shAUII-rmIAJlr_ AIl~ nwr'ji:Jjlt' vn !oJld land hl\'ld by til" mOfliJ,tt I! ht"reby rltlu~ltd 10 tnt" u:ttnt. but only to the ("1I1Imt, ul'Ct'$5;1.rr 11) .5'1lWrdlllllf" Itll' s:ud mort,ai~ hI Ihp rights. l'I("rt'by Iranlrd (0 Ih. 'r .. nt ..... • IN \\'ITN(S$ WHF:A f:Or \hls Inslr'llml\'nl 1\;11 bU'n I"x.cull'd 11'11' Iby ~nd ,.." .. r 17.' .Jbu'rr .. rillton. . ti/'n-; -1.--<: /y • \ \ , C\J o OJ ) EASEMENT for 11 valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. the Gronlor[f'). HO! EI F BI ISS hereby ~rBnt_and convey_lo Ihe Grantce{s), ~s G RAT7SCH AND RETTY' RArzSCH H1S WIEE -the.1..!:.-SUCcessors nnd 11881gn1l, the right. privilege nnd outhorlly 10 construct. Improve. repair and maIntaIn spot lc drainane lines acroBS, over and upon the lena] Iy described lQ x 72 feel of the following land. located in KING County. Slale of Wushlnglon, to·wft: THAT PORTION OF lOT 3, SHORT PLAT NO. 675015, RECORDED UNDER'S FILE NO. 7509050645, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLO~S: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2 OF SAID SHORT PLAT: THEIICE NORTH 0°44'45" EAST 72,00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 86°09'34" EAST 20,00 FEET: THENCE SOUTH OQ44'45" WEST 71.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH B8009'34" WEST 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. The Gra' tor Is) shall make r,1.l-lise of the land occupied by 6111d OPQINQGE FIE' n eO/12"12 REeD F .£WtlW'EOQ ~0768 3,00 except fur __ ~I~A~WUN~O~RLEG~A~RD~F~NL-___________________________________________ __ In exercising the rlghla herein granted, the Granteels]. ---th~ sUGcessOts and assigns. may pe .. and'rep ... ever ,old DRP.INAGE FIELD ONLY AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN and may CU~ and remove brush. trees Bnd other obslructhms which In the opinion of the Grantee{B} inlerCere(s) wHh SECO TIe non IMAGE The covenants herein contained shall fun with the land and are bindIng upon all subsequent owners thereof. In Witness Whereof, the said Granlorls) h~ executed this instrument Ihis .....o5.:;th,,-_day of DECU~BCR , 19..!l£.. L-. " •. (.:/ l' ,' .. . i~ {.~ ).; .', STATE OFW·ASHINGTON, } Ceunty ef -'K"I"N;:;.G _________ _ ss, (Individual Acknowledgment) I. r~At'llE PALMER , NDtary Public in Bnd for the State of Washinglon, residing at 19003 SE' 12Bth , do hereby certify thAI on Ihls HI:! day of _",,9.,[ bOlEofHI!lB'hEI<R---------, 1 9-00-, P efS 0 n a II yap p e ore d b e r ore me __ -,V"I",O"L!:.ET,--!F":,-,!BL",,,I S"S'--____ _ 10 me known to be Ihe Indtvlduo.l_ dc-lIcrtbcd In nnd whD uxecuted the within instrument and llcknowledged Ihllt SHE. al,!lned the some 6S HER free nnd vulunlory Rct "nd dllrtd fIJr tho (11IeJ nnd purposes horeln mttntloned. GIVF.N UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this ~d.y ol...jf9££1G;fEI-IIIIB,.£-R-R---'-_ 10..Q!L. "', , • -:-:. J . Notary PubHc in and for tha State of Washington, re _~RE>o.lN",T",O"N_'_· ,--_In .ald Cou n ty, l1. EXCIS =r-~-' In No. I lIn WIIOLB OR IN PART IN ANV fORM WJIATSOIiVEA. E . ' \ 20051011002754.001 , . 11111111111111111 20051011002754 PACIFIC NU TIT EAS 39.00 PAGE00t OF 008 10/11/2005 16:29 KING COUNT~, UA COVER SHEET Return Address: 6\ 3'=\ Ridgeview Court, LLC POBox 2401 Kirkland, WA 98083 ~ W~'1tX>-'f Please print or type information. Document Title(s) or transllctions contained therein): FILED BY Pi'lWT 1. Temporary Construction Easement 2. Reference Number(s) or Documents assigued or released: ']~ ,. , <:~:...,(fJ (on page of Document(s» ",; ""1£ ,1 1., 3 cr ~(.t..:a'<Q,. Grantor(s) (Last name f'rrst, then first name and initials) )i L8'-M 1. Charles G Ratzsch :eO-:.rc.I~ _ u C J 2. '!> il ~ ~,,,, 'i", ":'-(JJ 3. Additional Names on Jla!!e of document. 1't 4" ~1 .... ::;.~ Grantee(s) (Last name first, then f"rrst name and initials) ,. ~. ", ;Z 1-.s. 1. Ridgeview Court, LLC q "[ ;l.. \l 2. ~f~l! 3. Additional Names on page of document. Legal Description (abbreviated: i.e. Lot, block~lat or section, township, range) See Exhibit A l.d, 7. \L <:. 'Sf' /.R''lD \'5 <; dz~-S--'-'\ flt.c.-;!. 756 'i.O Additionalle!!al is on Jla!!e 6 of document Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number 152305-9193 Additional legal is on page of document The Auditor/Recorded wHl rely on the information provided on the form. Th'C stnffwJll not read the document to verify the occur.acy or compleleness of the Indexing information provided within. --I After recording, return to: Ridgeview Court, LLC PO Box 2401 Kirkland, WA 98004 425-893-8478 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 20051011002754.002 THIS TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ("Easement") is entered into on thist1,day of~*robeG 2005, by and between CHARLES G. RA TZSCH; an individual, (herein after referred to as "GRANTOR") and RIDGEVIEW COURT, LLC; a Washington corporation, its successors or assigns, (herein after referred to as "GRANTEE")_ RECITALS A. Grantor is the owner of certain real property located in King Count, State of Washington, as further described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof ("Grantor's Property). B. Grantee has requested and Grantor has agreed to grant to Grantee, subj eet to the terms and conditions contained herein, a non-exclusive, temporary constroction easement over, across, along, in, upon and under a portion of Grantor's property ("Easement Area") for purposes of grading for a road widening of Bremerton Ave NE for the City of Renton. Said Easement Area is further described in "Figure 1 Easement Exhibit" attached hereto and made a part hereof AGREEMENT NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum ofTen Dollars ($10) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Grant of Easement. Grantor hereby grants to Grantee a non-exclusive, temporary construction easement over, across, along, in, upon, and under the Easement Area for the purposes of pennitting Grantee, its officers, agents, employees, and contractor's access to the Easement Area for grading purPoses for construct of the widening of Bremerton Ave NE per approved plans by the City of Renton. ) 20051011002754.003 2. Term. It is the intent of both patties for this Easement to be temporary and that it shall automatically terminate upon the completion of road widening and grading activities on Grantor's property. Upon termination ofthis Easement, Grantor and Grantee agree they shall record a relinquishment of easement in the real estate records of King County. 3. Permits. Grantee represents and warrants it shall have obtained all necessruy licenses and permits from any governmental agency having jurisdiction, to execute the Construction Activities. 4. Insurance. Grantee shall throughout the performance of the Construction Activities, at its own expense, carrY,or cause to be carried, Workers Compensation Insurance in statutory limits, and General Liability Insurance for any occurrence in or about the Property with an aggregate annual limit of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000). 5. Notices. All notices, demands, consents, approvals and other communications which are required or desired to be given by either party to the other hereunder shall be in writing and shan be hand-delivered, delivered by facsimile, or sent by United States registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the appropriate party at its address set forth below, or at such other address as such party shall have last designated by notice to the other. Hand- delivered and faxed notices shall be deemed received On the day of delivery, and mailed notices on the third business day after postmark. If to Grantor: If to Grantee: Charles O. Ratzsch 320 Bremerton Ave NE Renton, WA 98055 425271-2114 Ridgeview Court, LLC PO Box 2401 Kirkland, W A 98083 Attu: Cliff Williruns, PE 206-714-7161 Fax: 425-893-8498 6. Indemnification. f'.mmtee shall indemnifY and hold Grantor harmless fiom and against all liability, damages, obligations, losses, claims, civil actions, costs or expenses, including Attorney Fees, arising from any act, omission or negligence of Grantee or its contractors, licensees, agents, employees, guests, invitees, residents, however, this indemnification shall not apply to the extent such costs arise in connection with Grantor's negligence or willful misconduct. 20051011002754.004 7. Attorney's Fees. In the event of any litigation regarding the rights and obligations under this Easement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable Attorneys' Fees and court costs. "Attorneys' Fees" shall include attorneys' fees and charges, paralegal and clerical fees and charges and other professional or consultants' fees and charges expended or incurred in connection therewith, including for appeals, which shall be determined and fixed by the court as part of the judgment 8. Entire Agreement. This Easement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter covered herein, and cannot be changed or modified other than by a written agreement executed by both parties: 9. Governing Law. This Easement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws ofthe State of Washington. 10. Captions. The captions and paragraph headings contained in this Easement are for the convenience and reference only and in nO way define, describe, extend or limit the scope of intent of this Easement, not the intent of any provision hereof. 11. Counterparts. This Easement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original of all purposed and all of which, when taken together, shall constitute one agreement. DATED this lY'Ik day06~'I'\hec2oo5. GRANTOR: CHARLES G. RATZSCH; an IndividuaL 20051011002754<005 STATE OF WASHINGTON) //. \ ) ss. COUNTY OF l'4"f ) On this.:...!JJ.L day of ~ , 2005, before me, the undersigned, a NOli}; Public in and for the Slate6fWashington, personally appeared _..,--__ £t.dr(Yk' Gr /?ah-'7tQ , the ~ of Parcel number 152305-9193, who executed thewitllin and foregoing document, and acknowledged the said instrument 10 be his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execule the said instrument on behalf of said Property, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL hereto affixed the day and year first above written. ~ Sta~hington, residing at .~ (Print Name) My commission Expires: --,/<.;,,?_~_-;z_cr-__ _ 20051011002754.006 STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF tW':3 ). On this ~ day of Se·c:Ae.Jue(2005, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State ofWashihiton, personally appearelBcl\;w(\-Y. \ De!':'? \ _______ ~, ml\~c of Ridgeview Court, LLC; a Washington Limited Liability Company, who executed the wIthIn and foregomg document, and acknowledged the said instrument to be his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument on behalf of said cOlporation. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL hereto affixed the day and year first above written. Tn ~9.&c I? CCb;t" NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Q.oAw",,,,,c, \, \ IT ill iChQ~ I d C-\9!Z J::.- (print Name) My commission ExpiresrJ\,. ~ . d-'l ·0"2 .~) EXHffiIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION 152305193 PP ACT 39924030 MOBILE HOME LOT 2 KC SHORT PLAT NO 675015 RECORDING NO 7509050645 SD PLAT DAF W 112 OF 5 1/2 OF NW 114 OF NE 114 OF NW 114 LESS W 30 FT FOR 136TH AVE SE LESS CIM RGTS 20051011002754.007 r------------------------------ .I FIGURE 1 EASEMENT EXHIBIT JO' 30' 1" ;;=j-:-'l>SB;r -..,.'" $' :ttci "'" $.9_ D-·9;>. IV D z 28.37' ------N8915'29"W I..oJ NS91S'29"W .w ~ ---~-;:;) ."';., 20.00 ~I-"" <eCQ N...t- , d ~Ib • I I I I __ I Z 8"-20.00' -,oz _ N88'09' 44"W I 0 I I II ! 10 70 I I American E ngineerfng Corporation . S"m,.~ RIDGEVIEW COURT TEMPORARY GRADING EASEMENT \-------====--------4 PFb.£CT tlUl.tOot ntp/llZlltH ....... P>\~~\O)j~,D.,,\StQItt:n""'r,l S"ll~ l~"" NT 9-1.3-05 20 '''' 0312 """ I ~-------------------------~- 20051011002754.008 l ! J ) 20051011002755.001 COVER SHEET Return Address: 5\~ Ridgeview Court, LLC POBox 2401 Kirkland, W A 98083 ~0T L:)-aro-i Please print or type information. Docnment Title(s) or transactions contained therein): ;:cn.F.D BY PNWl 1. Temporary Construction Easement 2. ' . ., '" :; Reference Number{s) or Documents assigned or released: ~ lii ..-(H ~~, 1Z1-~ (on page of Document(s» tl~3t1' 0', ""~ "" ... '" -0 Grantor(s) (Last name first, then first name and initials) ,;t :', ~ ~ 1. Violet F Bliss Trust ~ 0 ~ , ,!>,%;;t~~ 2. 7*"'i~ ~ 3. Additional Names on page of document. ';; ;rId GraiItee(s) (Last name first, then first name and initials) ti~~ 1. Ridgeview Court, LLC ,.. ~!. 2. ~t~ilt 3. Additional Names on page of document. Legal Description (abbreviated: i.e. Lot, block, plat or section, township, range) See Exhibit AU. ') Ie.. C 'bif> (..105015 __ , ' (k.<:-" 7:5V'i ~':::> Additional legal is on page 6 of document Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number 152305-9035 Additional legal is on pal!e of document The AuditorlR(!~orded wiD nly on tbe information provided on the fothl.. The staff will not read the document to veriry tbe accunn::y or completeness of the indexing inrOrmn~Qn provided within. 20051011002755.002 After recording, return to: Ridgeview Court, LLC PO Box 2401 Kirkland, W A 98004 425-893-8478 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT TillS TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ("Easement") is entered into on this~ay of ~ffi\?f(.2005, by and between the VIOLET F. BLISS TRUST; an individual, (herein after referred to as "GRANTOR'') and RIDGEVIEW COURT, LLC; a Washington corporation, its successors or assigns, (herein after referred to as "GRANTEE"). RECITALS A. Grantor is the owner of certain real property located in [(jng Count, State of Washington, as further descnoed in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof("Grantor's Property). B. Grantee has requested and Grantor has agreed to grant to Grantee, subject to the teons and conditions contained herein, a non-exclusive, temporary construction easement over, across, along, in, upon and under a portion of Grantor's property ("Easement Area'') for purposes of grading for a road widening of Bremerton Ave NE for the City of Renton. Said Easement Area is further described in "Figure 1 Easement Exhibit" attached hereto and made a part hereof. AGREEMENT NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the-sum ofTen Dollars ($] 0) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Grant of Easement. Grantor hereby grants to Grantee a non-exclusive, temporary construction easement over, across, along, in, upon, and under the Easement Area for the purposes of permitting Grantee, its officers, agents, employees, and contractor's access 10 the Easement Area for grading purposes for construct of the widening of Bremerton Ave NE per approved plans by the City of Renton. , / 20051011002755.003 2. Term. It is the intent of both parties for this Easement to be temporary and that it shall automaticaIly terminate upon the completion of road widening and grading activities on Grantor's property. Upon termination of this Easement, Grantor and Grantee agree they shaIl record a relinquishment of easement in the real estate records of King County. 3. Permits. Grantee represents and warrants it shall have obtained all necessary licenses and permits from any governmental agency having jurisdiction, to execute the Construction Activities. 4. Insurance. Grantee shall throughout the performance of the Construction Activities, at its Own expense, carry, or cause to be carried, Workers· Compensation Insurance in statutory limits, and General Liability Insurance for any occurrence in or about the Property with an aggregate annual limit of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000). 5. Notices. All notices, demands, consents, approvals and other communications which are required or desired to be given by either party to the other hereunder shall be in writing and shall be hand-delivered, delivered by facsimile, or sent by United States registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the appropriate party at its address set forth below, or at such other address as such party shall bave last designated by notice to the other. Hand- delivered and faxed notices shaH be deemed received on the day of delivery, and mailed notices on the third business day after postmark. If to Grantor: If to Grantee: Violet F Bliss Trust 330 Bremerton Ave NE Renton, W A 98055 Ridgeview Court, LLC PO Box 2401 Kirkland, W A 98083 Attn: Cliff Williams, PE 206-714-7161 Fax: 425-893-8498 6. Indemnification. Grantee sball indemnify and bold Grantor harmless from and against all liability, damages, obligations, losses, claims, civil actions, costs or expenses, including Attorney Fees, arising from any act, omission or negligence of Grantee or its contractors, licensees, agents, employees, gnests, invitees, residents, however, this indemnification shall not apply to the extent such costs arise in connection with Grantor's negligence or willful misconduct. 20051011002755.004 7. Attorney's Fees. In the event of any litigation regarding the rights and obligations under this Easement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable Attorneys' Fees and court costs. "Attorneys' Fees" shall include attorneys' fees and charges, paralegal and clerical fees and charges and other professional or consultants' fees and charges expended or incurred in connection therewith, including for appeals, which shall be determined and fixed by the court as part of the judgment. 8. Entire Agreement. This Easement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter covered herein, and cannot be changed Or modified other than by a written agreement executed by both parties. 9. Governing Law. TIlls Easement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. 10. Captions. The captions and paragraph headings contained in this Easement are for the convenience and reference only and in no way define, describe, extend or limit the scope of intent of Ihis Easement, not the intent of any provision hereof: ll. Counterparts. This Easement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original of all purposed and all of which, when taken together, shall constitute one agreement. DATEDthis. 11_\"'" dayo~rI\k2005. GRANTOR! VIOLET F. BLISS TRUST; an Individual. By --:-m:.m',LfL.~f.---.!'--;; Its ---,?""-----:6/-~9' 20051011002755.005 STATEOFWASHrNGTON) I/. I ) ss. COUNTY OF f'~t"1') On this ~ day of ~. ; 2005, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared VtO?PI F 1iU'i'i _______ ~, the --rR.y:;f'U-.-of Parcel number 152305-9035, who executed the within and foregoing document, and acknowledged the said instrument to be his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument on behalf of said Property. WJ1NESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL hereto affixed the day and year first above written. /h/JA4/4L/ F ~mandforthe State of Washin~?,;;~iding at /f..rp'1v) ~ (Print Name) My commission Expires: /'717-0)---- 20051011002755.006 STATE OF WASHINGTON) • ) ss. COUNTY OF lli~) ... On this ~ day of ~~ 2005, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of~, personally appeared }((!)\r;QCt j? \)' \QI-;>Z-\ __ -:-:...,..,.-:---::_, of Ridgeview Court, LLC; a Washington Limited Liability Company, who executed the within and foregoing document, and acknowledged the said instrument to be his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument on behalf of said corporation. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL hereto affixed the day and year first above written. 20051011002755.007 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION 15230535 LOT 3 KC SHORT PLAT NO 675015 RECORDING NO 7509050645 SO PLAT OAF W 112 OF S 112 OF NW 114 OF NE 114 OF NW 1/4 LESS W 30 FT FOR 136TH AVE SE LESS CIM RGTS TAX POR PARTIALLY EX UNDER RCW 84.36.381 THRU .389 LOT 3 KC SHORT PLAT NO 675015 RECORDING NO 7509050645 SO PLAT OAF W 112 OF S 1/2 OF NW 114 OF NE 114 OF NW 114 LESS W 30 FT FOR 136 TH AVE SE LESS C/M RGTS TAX POR PARTIALLY EX UNDER RCW 84.36.381 THRU .389 NOTICED ) FIGURE 1 EASEMENT EXHIBIT 30' o , ~ , 10 • 1 INCH .. 20 , s~"." RIDGEVIEW COURT '0 • American Engineering C orporotion TEMPORARY GRADING EASEMENT I-____ . .., ... =~;;;; .. -..-;;;_=-------II'ROJECT ItlJJ.mtll """",~",,..~,,,~,,~,,,,,,,,. ""''''' .= ffl '" 0312 'Mlt 9-13-05 20 20051011002755,,008 I I _____ J • fr-r -i---.--------~-· - .... '" o LEGAL KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON Th~. apAce ro •• rvod tor APPROYAL r.cordor'. U." i97'.i 'c-5 PIA 2 5~ ~:.:,:::CE.t; f\ECOHDS ~ r~ECTIO:~S KING CCUPiTY. vWS~ riled for record .e th~ r_qul!ISt 0/' \},j\U1N1-bLl~ ~ .... Land U.e ~4n~g~men~ Djv~ W215, King Co; Courtho~c S •• ttl., w.&h1ngton 96104 DESCRIPTION D4p.rt~nt of co~lt~ , Environmental ~velop~nt DJvl.ion at Land u •• ~nagomont c."m1n.d and approvt:d t,hl • ...!!. day of killer ,19K-C'~#.l. .!. D."."rth!tnt of A$.~ ... ment.Jf Ex,amlntrd otnd approved thLs Ie( ~HOPl'J<. The west half of the South Half of tho NW-l!4 of the NE-l!4 of the NW--l!4 of Section 15, Twp. 23 N., Rge. 5 E.W.M., exO!:pt the West 30 feot lor 136th Ave. 5.E. Map on FII. In: Vault Page 1 of ~ • , ) { i ( ! i ) \ DECLARATIOO : Know &.11 men by tbeeo presuntB that lI'&. the UDdersl~ed. owner(s) io fee dmple lond contuct purchaser(a)1 ot the la.nd herein described do hereby make a short aubdivision thereot pursuant to RCI 58.17.060 Lnd declare tblB abort plat to be the graphic representation ot same, and that said sbort subdivision is DlI.da with the tree consent and 1n accordance with tbe desire of tbe owner(a). In witneBs wbereo! we ha.ve sct our hancie and sea.ls. Nama Name ST U'S OF II ABIIINCJrON'1 County ot ~~l ry .... On eh..t. da§l penonllllv apSX'.red b.tor" J:JIl ll)! (I, '" \In-B b ISS Ul0/e± (.'BL'55 to _ mGJW'l'1 Co b. eh. ind.1vidUIIl ~.cr.tb.d in .nd .,00 • .ncut.d the "J.t.hln and fDrtJr"oing wt.rt.uIIMt, IUJd .cknOftl.cf~d th.t M:: r .1gnttd til_ .~_ ... Mtet ytrH And vclWltu-y act .lnd ciNe!, far-the u..-•• lind pur;o. ... 'thdnln lDMtlcMd. GIVEN und~r 1DV hand lllId offJ.c J 6eal thu .3..L dAV of _~"...,u.Jt-__ ,19.Ld.:- ""I STArn OF 11 ABRINGroIl '1" Count:!I of, _____ _ On th1s dajJ pO'rsontlllv 4ppsared bfltore JIXt __________________ _ to ,. knotm to b6 thfJ jnd1vJdud duar.1baod .in ana who 8XllrCUCed the tI.1thJn and tongoing .1nctrum.nt, .nd' Itc:knowledged thoIt .!'1971.d the 6 ...•• ____ fno and \"01Ul1t4.r,1 -tet And d .. 4, tor th_ U.0Ir And pur,poll •• thereJn aJSntlon,,4. Short Plat Nurrber..iLl:.i ~ J :/ Not.1lI JlUbJJc in end tor the Stet. of " .... h.ington, n/ddJ.ng .t I, , I I I 1 i I· I [1 -r I_ _. ~-" ~ .. ------ " (ok<. COf" Nol?· )' -T~ ;5 88"_C!Z 'S8'c MC~r. /6 /~-""~, .. .Y. E 1'2 l3 nl ' . sT. ~I ,V <-i- t II ~I I I \ ~ , ti ; 1 , "(Jt. //i-.' W I :£J 01 2.93.5/' , '" ..:-<\J -.0 '" ~ :~, '>-~ ~ ).. 1 &1 < -~ ~ ,..~ .$' .3 'l- CJb Il; '2 ..Ys-, \\. f\i~ ~ 3_1: 9 .. ,,- < b- 'iJ r 1 'l)1j~ '" • ~ z ~ ~ ''Ii ~'i-~'4J ':i..~ ~ ~ "\ ' "t.:~ A?s. 7:1' ' , \) ~ ~ ::S' ,", /:5"9. 99' G ~(j ~ " , ~ --f ~ L~ '" ~ I :9_ !J9 ' 3. BZ ' '</e8·o~'3.;t-ry L.nd sur""l/or'. Certi(jc.tl'l ".p en FIle In Va"lt r ( rhJ •• hQrt pJ.t cOlcectlv rl'pr •• ane. - I .urv'1l _d* bV .. or Uluf.r 1IY ,cUnct.,fon I 1.n conloru.tnr: • .,ah the nquJl ... JlJU (If pjr.ctlool .pproS'd.t* .le,te .nd' count II .e.tut. and ! or4JNnc •. ~h.r /:4~ Seu., /'~ ~O , I»t. I •• ~ tI ~ , CertltJc.lt. NOl (,012- Short Pl.t No. 4?7S<9/5"·, P. g<t.3 ot!:;J ., {n, ./ .... ,,). " mrj> Ii""/ I .. " ,.,. ,~, '" .""'-' '" .., Wi~ ""r , .. r, O"'T[O :' " ,I ; ,.r {t ~ t,,~ .. / I: ~.I:. , ,/{ k))' <r4." / ( J ' {' " i B\.OCK -.---'-. -----.----.. ----------~--=- . . ... ~- . ____ .. _~,:~~~-.L ,-'-, --------- "' • ..! I, \,. ! .. ,.-, I~ , J ;'A.C1.,.ic: D.tltD Pvna :.6b\ W/i'AS. F.,."'U t"tH'tlrdJ ~ un 4. tf I. S. p.lltJJ foi,ft,. J...dtd!~f. t!orlM ~Cf Mfl/lr Jpf"r./rJ, 1'I!lt' t"tr,~ !Of'f r." I" C'fIIIt6 ., I III ~I J_ '''. N"', ,., I. sp ~ tA,. bl, iuhd Id I" K C WI i IIC/") JZI;Prt; Jrw oN Lit .. t. U P' ~~.,. 1M" H II~J:r .1rrrld 10 """'(l'i"~ t"I" il"1ll". I2l1d 41:,,; rAt ur fI/ •• d. Art#! rrl d'UO, a..Ifl'tT&M17/V ,..r,IJI f ~ro!'" 41~r rl ~f fIr!f1l t. "('~ ,.utrrl'4 aM nrplJ taol Ii iflli'4 IJ.!",. ,tl"P' 0/ upWriP'I. ~" 4 8l'M"Ulif u,. ,~. To 0\ ct h I" 5, P M fr,.,. ... d.rarr fJf allliHll, ~A.V' If ",rn.bI", t'.r:r~ rd,h" A~Ui/fI1Il.ltV.n.rtl"HJtl,t,., :"~ ;f' ... '~~!' ~ ..) .• / ~~Jo Co.u C" w. ~:rql 0:' agojot.n hun .... IIU, .. ..,r, lJfarr,-I .• ('Is 1/1111 •• S P IIIUII",t"_ In ~'r .w ,"" ... (lJ_.J '''', .. ,r,.11 ,~,., l...ur'll..-0, It~ rflrp '"" ,f. aipd b, Ih Pnd. , , ,-"'"\" : tr, "" Ii .. c" l C.rp ~ '.-..,...--_. 1f .. rtJ,,.~,, n)f'.rtr H~IJtf>rl" I'1Iff\1'f'''; 89 U· / j/~~ (.{", " ~1/(./~· -L,,'(r PruJJml ; .. ,~ ~.~,;.~; !,.\. ~i;,)tr . .1,;:;.-,:'- . :J¥Lr: :-~. ~'~:~;:"f ... , "'.,.' ;~:' ,;,:2fICt2,K ','. ~~' C; ,., -kJ '"-; kJ ~ 1 I 1 1 ~ I 1 c::, - "" ~ /' '" >\., M~ ". ,", , ~ !-, ~ CERTlFICATE I. the c~c;:I;Jgned, (!A;r7f Clerk of the City of Renton, W3:;i:ington, certify that this Is a true ""d ,,'re" '''' ~" . SUbSClibedandSeal~92fI eric - CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4612 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON. WASIUNGTOIf, ESTABLISIlIl'lG AN ASSESSHBNT DISl'RICT POR SANITARY SRWER. SERVICE IN A POlITIOtt DE' TI!Il SOlJ'lll HIGHLANDS, JmATlIER DOllNS, AND HAPLEWOOD SUB-BASINS lIlm RSTABLI:SBmG THE Al&0llNT OF THE CHARGE Ul'0l< COlmECT1:ON TO TH~ l1AC:cLITIES. Tim CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS, SECTION 1:. There is hereby created a Sanitary Sewer Service Special Assessment District £or the area served by tbe East Renton Sanitary Sewer Intercepto~ in the northeast quadrant of the City of Renton and a portion of its urban growth area within unincorporated King County, which area is more particula~ly described in Exhibit Y:lA" attached hereto. A map of the service area is attached as Exhibit ~B.~ The recording of this document is to provide notification of potential connection and interest charges~ While this connection charge may be paid at any time, the • City does not require payment uDtiJ. such time as the parcel is connected t.o and thus benefiting from the sewer facilities. The property may be sold or in any other way change bands without triggering tne requirement, by the City. of payment of t.he charges associated with this district. SECTION II. Persons connecting to the sanitary sewer facilities in tbis Special Assessment District and which properties ~ g; ~ N .. 51 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ = M '" ., -~ ~ g ~ 5'1 = = ~ ~ ~ • ~ l ~ , ~ I is 1 I I I I I I l ) ~ , 7 I I I I i I I I 1 ) , , 1 • i ORDINANCE 4612 have not been charged or assessed with all costs of the East Renton Sanitary Sewer Interceptor, as detailed in this ordinance, shall pay, in addition to the payment of the connection permit fee and in addition to the system development charge, the following additional fees, A. Per Unit Charge. New connections of residential dwelling units or equivalents shall pay a fee of $224.52 per dwelling unit and all other uses shall pay a unit charge of $0.069 per square foot of property. Those properties included within this SpeCial Assessment District and which may be assessed a charge thereunder are included within the boundary legally described in Exhibit "AU and which boundary is shown on the'me.p attached as Exhibit "B." SECTION HI. In addition to· the aforestated charges, there shall be a charge of 4.11~ per annum added to the Per Unit Charge. The interest charge shall accrue for no more than ten (10) years from the date this ordinance becomes effective. Interest charges will be simple interest and not compound interest. SECTION IV. This ordinance shall be effe.ctive upon its passage, approval, and thirty (3D) days after publication'. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this lQth day Of ""J",uun""e'-_~LL 1996, City Clerk 2 I ~ f ~ ~ ~ i t , i I I I I , ! i 1 j ORDINANCE 4612 APPROVED BY THE 14AYOR this lOth day of _J_u_n_e _____ _ 1996 . Jes Tanner, Mayor Appro~as to form: . c/.~P~,:I"",j2,- Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: 6/14/96 ORD.576:S/20/96:as_ t l i .. .I i } 3 I , ~---------------------------------------- I I I , , . j . j i . --,~ .. -~.-.~~,.~.~~--==~-------' ~-------------- Exhibit A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR THE CITY OF RENTON -EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR Portions of Sections 8, 9, 10. 11, 14. 15. 16. 17.21 and 22 all in Township 23N. Range 5E W.M. in King County. Washington Section 8, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. All of that portion of Section 8, Township 23N. Range 5E W.M. lying East of the East right·or-way line of SR-405 and South of the fonowing described line: Beginning at the intersection of the East line of said Section 8 with the centerline of NE 7th Street: thence Westerly along said centerline of NE 7th Street to its intersection with the centerline of Sunset Boulevard NE: thence Northerly along the centerline of Sunset Boulevard NE to the North line of the Southeast 114 of said Section 8: thence West along said North line to the East right-of-way line of SR-405 and the terminus of said line. 'Section 9, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. All of that portion of Section 9. Township 23N. Range 5E W.M. lying South and East of the following described line: . BegInning on the centerline of NE 7th Street at its intersection with the centerline of Edmonds Avenue NE; thence Easterly along the centerline of NE 7th Street to its intersection with the centerline of Monroe Avenue NE; thence North along said centerline to the South line of the Northeast % of said Section 9; thence East along said South line to its intersection with the centerline of Redmond Avenue NE; thence Northerly along said centerline to its intersection with the centerline of NE lOth Street; thence East along said centerline to the East line of said Section 9 and the terminus of said line. Section 10, TownShip 23N, Range 5E W.M. All of that portion of Section 10, TownshJp 23N. Range 5E W.M. lying Southerly and Westerly of the fallowing described line: Beginning on the West line of Section 10 at its intersection with the North line of the South Y.> of the North Y.> of said Section 10; thence East along said North line to its intersection with the centerline of 142nd Avenue SE; thence Southerly along said centerline to its intersection with the North line of the Southeast % of said Section 10; thence East along said North line to its intersection with the East line of said Section 10 and the terminus of said line . i f i I i , i I I ! 1 j l [ega! Descriph'on of the Special Assessment District fOT the City a( Renton -East Rmton Interceptor Section 11, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. All of the Southwest Vi of Section 11. Township 23N. Range 5E W.M.. Section 14, Township 23N, Rang~ 5E W.M. Page 20/3 All of that portion of Section 14. Township 23N. Range 5E. W.M. descnbed as follows: All of the Northwest v.. of said section, together with the Southwest Vi of said section, except the South Y.> of the Southeast \4 of said Southwest v.. and except the plat of Mcintire Homesites and 'h of streets adjacent as re~rded in the Book of Plats. Volume 58, Page 82, Records of King County, Washington, and except the South 151.55 feet of the East 239.435 feet of Tract 6, Block 1 of C.edar River Five Acre Tracts as recorded in the Book of Plats. Volume 16, Page 52, Records of King County, Washington, less \h of the street abutting said portion of Tract 6, Block 1, and less Tract 6, Block 2 of said Cedar River Five Acre Tracts, less Ih of the street adjacent to said Tract 6, Block 2, and except the South 82.785 feet of the East 150 feet of Tract 5, Block 2 of said Cedar RiVer Five Acre Tracts and less Ih the street adjacent to said portion of Tract 5. Block 2. Section 15, TownShip 23N, Range 5E W.M. All of that portion of Section 15, Township 23N, Range BE. W.M., except the Southwest Vi of the Southwest \4 of the Southwest \4 of said section. Section 16, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. All rif that portion of Section 16, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M., except that portion of the Southeast ',4 of the Southeast Vi of the said Section 16 lying East of the East nne of the Plat of Maplewood Division No.2 as recorded in the Book of Plats Volume 39, page 39. Records of King County Washington and its Northerly extension to the North line of said Southeast Vi of the Southeast \4 of the said Section 16 and except that portion of said section lying Southerly of the Northerly light-of-way line of SR-169 (Maple Valley Highway). ' Section 17, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. All of that portion of Section 17, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M., lying Northeasterly of the Northeasterly right-or-way of SR-169 (Maple Valley Highway) and Easterly of the East right-of-way line of SR-405 less that portion lying generally West of the East and Southeasterly line of Bronson Way NE !yIng I • > • i ! • ~ , , i i f i ~ , < f j i I ! 1 j , j ~ , I Legal Description of the Special Assessment District for the City of Renton --East Renton Interceptor Page 3 0{3 between the South line of the NE 3rd Street and the Northeasterly margin of SR- 405. Section 21, Township 23N, Range 5E W,M. All that portion of Section 21, Township 23N, R 5E W.M. lyirJg Northeasterly of the Northeasterly right-of-way line of SR-169 (Maple Valley Highway) and West of the East line of the Plat of Maplewood Division No. 2 as recorded in the Book of Plats, volume 39. page 39, Records of King County. Washington. Section 22, Township 23N, Range 5E W.M. All of that portion of Section 22. Thwnship 23N. Range 5E W.M. described as follows: All of the Northwest 'A of the Northeast 'A of said Section 22 lyirJg Northerly of the Southerly line of the Plat of Maplewoo~ Helghts as recorded In the Book of Plats, volume 78. pages 1 through 4. Records of Ring County, Washington. , Together with the North 227.11 feet of the west 97.02 of the Northeast '''' of the Northeast 'A of said Section 22. I ! t , , I I , • I J ~ i i , ~ I , I I I i I i I i , i i ! Exhibit B EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR Special Assessment District Boundary 2000 1:24,000 -------City Limits I i I i I ~ I ! , , I i ., , I 1 l \ ! ! I 1 ~ , + + PbW~~~.W~ fa) SANITARY S>WIRS ~ Clrkt.",en,MacOni.,Vi,"",~j IZTJ...2J Special As."""'.nt O;,lrid 'i 20 May 1996 20080104001145.001 RETURN ADDRESS: Larry L Barokas BAROKAS MARTIN & TOMLINSON 1422 Believue Avenue SeattIc, WA 98122 WASHINGTON STATE RECORDER'S Cover Sheet (RCW 65.04) Document Title(s) (or transactions contained therein): (all areas app1icable to your document mus( be filled in) L Agreement nnd Easement for Drainage Facility 2 3. 4. Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or reJeased: Additional reference #'5 on page ___ of document Grantor(s) (Last name first, then first name and initials) L Schneider Homes I, LLC 2. 3. 4. __ Additional names on page of document Grantec(s) (Last name first, then first name and initials) I. J&M Land Development, Inc. CHICAGO TITLE INS, CO@ 2. 4111 & Bremerton, LLC REF# Wt>f'o I 00 1_ /0 3. Nicholas, Dr. Kim A. 4. BuUor, Dr. Baljinder S. __ AddItional names on page of document Legal description (abbreviated: i.e. lot, block, plat or scclion, township, range) Lot D, City of Renton Hillcrest lot Iinc adjusbnent No. LUA·05-OJ I-LLA Recording No. 20050719900009 _X_ Addition.llegal is on pages 6, 7. 8 and 9 of document Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number __ X_ Assessor Tax #1523059034, 1523059035,1523059193,2050500010,7227000020,7227000010 The Auditor/RecorderwilI rely on the information provided on the fonn. The starfwill not read the document to verify the accuracy or completeness of the indexing lnfonnation provided herein. EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED fi:ln; Co. R.oords f I i i , Return Address: Lair)' L Barokas BaroJcas Martin & Tomlinson 1422 IleHevue Avenue Seattle, WA 98122 AGREEMENT AND EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE FACILITY 20080104001145.002 Reference # {Pkasc prinllast nam: first} Grantor{s): Owner: Schneider Homes I, LLC Add'i on P&_ Grantee(s): (I) J&M Land Developmen~ Inc. (2) 4" & Bremerton, LLC Add'I on pg. I Legal Description:Lot D,City of Renton Hillcrest Square lot lin. adjushoent Add'i legal on pg. 6,7,8 & 9 AssessOT's Property TID< ParcellAccount # 1523059034,1523059035, 1523059193,2050500010,7227000020, 7227000010 TillS AGREEMENT is made this f dayof'b",UMIJ,>4'_ 2007 between Schneider Homed, LLC., owner of the property legaUy descneed on Exhibit A ("Grantor" herein) on the one hand and, on the other hand, 4" & Bremerton, LLC, owner of lb. property legalIydescribed on Exhibit B ("Bremerton" or "Bremerton Property"), Dr. Kim A. NichDIas and Dr. Baljinder S. Buttar, owners of the properties legaUy described on Exhibit C ("Nicholas and Buttar" or "NB Properties") nod J&M Land Development, Inc. owner of the property legally descneed on Exhibit 0 C'J&MII or uJ&M Property"), or their r.espective successors or assigns, referred to in the aggregate as jlGrnntees" herem. The purpose of the Easement is to facilitate the construction ofa drainage pipeline on the Exhibit A property to accept stonn drainage from the Exhibit Bt C and D properties and dispose of the same in accordance with the requirements of aU public authorities having jurisdiction over this Easement and the properties referred to herein. The "Easement Area" in this instrument refers to the area on the property described in Exhibit A which is necessaryfo! the purpose of the Easement stated herein and which extends approximately ten (10) reet over, under and across the notthem boundary of Exhibit A property. NOW, THEREFORE for One DoUar ($1.00) and other valuable consideration in hand paid the receipt of which is acIrnowledged, it is hereby agreed as follows: A. Temporary Construction Easement 1. Grantor hereby grants and conveys to J&M a temporary easement over! under and across Grantor~s property to construct and install a drainage pipeline in the easement area for the purpose of accepting stonn drainage from Ibe Exhibit B, C and D properties and to dispose of the same in conformance with all laws and regulations applicable thereto. The work shall be done at the sole cost and expense of J &M. The size of the drainage pipeline shall not exceed twelve (12) inches in diameter with • Type 2-48 inch diameter catoh basin. J&M shall coordinate all of its activities on the easement area with the Grnntor provided, however, that in the event of an emergency requiring inunediate action for the protection of the facilities or respective properties, J&M may take such action as is reasonable under the circumstances without notice. 2. All work shall be perfonned in a careful and workmanlike manner to Grantor's satisfaction fre. of all Agreement and Easement for Drainage Facility -I 20060104001145.003 liens and claims and J&M Land Development, Inc. shall indemnify and hold Grantor hannfess from the same. All work shal! be done in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the appropriate City of Renton agencies, Upon completion of the construction work, J&M shall remove all debris, replace all property disturbed or destroyed during lhe work nnd restore the surface of the easement arca as nearty as possible to the same condition it was in immedi31ely before the condition oflhe work 30 Upon request of Gran tOT ) J&M shall provide Grantor with flsMbutlt drawings and a survey sho\\ ing the location and depth of the drainage facHity in the easement area. 4. In the event J&M breaches or Fails to perform or observe any of the terms and conditions of this temporary easement and fails to cure such breach or default within ninety (90) days of Grnntor giving l&M written notice hereof, Grantor may tenninate the temporary easement and alt of J&M's rights under this agreement. B. Pennanent Easement 1. Upon compJefion of the work set forth in Section A above. the Grantor hereby grants to Grantee an exclusive, permanent and perpetual easement over, under and across the easement area for the purpose of accep!ingstonn dratnage from the Exhibit B, C and D properties and disposing ofthesame int::onfonnance with alI1a\\,'s and regulations applicable thereto. Said easements shall include the right to enter onto the easement area and any adjacent area necessary for the maintenance and repair aftne pipeline. 2. Grantor may instal( fencing, decking, dc.ck support posts, landscaping and pavement surfacing over the easement area as defined herein and agrees not to remove or d<lmage the said drainage piping or Ihe cmen basin or construct improvements that may damage the operation ofthe drainage pipe/system. 3. J&M may remove the improvements placed on the easement area by Grantor for the easement purposes including maintenance and repair and further agrees to replace the same in a condition equal [0 or better Ihan they we,e in before J&M removed them. 4. J&M does hereby release, indemnifY nnd promise to defend and save harmless Grantor from and against any and an liability • loss or damage including attorney's fees incurred by Granlor because of the acts or omissions of J&M, except those caused by the sole negrige~ce of Grantor or Grantor's agents or employees. S. Notice is required to be in writing under this Agreement and shall be given as follows: IF TO GRANTOR: Schneider Homes I, LLC 6510 Southeenle, Boulevard. Suite I Tukwila, WA 98188 IF TO GRANTEES: J&M Land Development, Inc. Post Office Box 2566 Renton t WA 98056 41h & Bremerton, LLC Altn: C. Godwin 7319 Bowlyn Place South Seattle, WA 98118 Agreement and Easement for Drainage Facility-2 Dr, Kim A. Nicbolas 4505 NE 4" Streot, # B RenlaD, WA 98059 Dr. B.ljindcr S. Buttar 4505 NE 4~ Street, II A Renton. W A 98059 20080104001145.004 6. In the event of any dispute concerning the interpretation or enforcement of any provision herein, the matter shall be resolved by alternate disputes resolution by submission to the Washington Arbitration and Mediation Service rvv AMS). The parties agree to flISt submit the matter for mediation. If Dot successfully mediated, tl,C dispule shall be reso]vcd by arbitration and the. arbitrntor shall be empowered to award attorney's fees and costs. including those incurred for expert witnesses, to the party that substantially prevails, 7; Said Easement is appurtenant to and shall run with the property described on Exhibit A for the benefit of the properties described on Exhibits B, C and D as easements and equitable servitudes and not easements in gross. This Easement shall be binding upon the properties aDd all persons owning, purchasing, leasing or occupying said property and their respective heirs, successors and aSSigns. 8. J&M shall at all times exercise its rights and obligarions herein in accordance with the requirements (as from time to time amended) with all applicable statutes, orders, rules and regulations of any public authority having jurisdiction. DATED this.::L. day of t>EC...l007. GRANTOR: SCHNEPlER HOMES I, LLC ~=-+----- GRANTEES: J&M LAND DEVELOPMENT, INC. 4'" & BREMERTON, LLC Agreement and Easement for Drainage Facility -3 20080104001145.005 By __ ~!~~~,~~~~~a~. __ ~~~== __ __ Dr.lGm A. Nicho1as By fA. d ~ ~ -=---= ~IJmdCr S. Buttar STATE OF WASHINGTON County of K iug )ss. , On tilis day personally appeared before me Lf!t.iW dk &:4dlwuqto me known to be Ibe petson who signed as Dlh oJ;-fur, of Schneider Homes I, C, Ibe limited liability corporarion IIlat executed the within Ulld foregoing instrument and acknowledged said instrument to be a free win and voluntary act and deed or Schneider Homes J, LLC. for the uses and purposes therein mentioned; and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument on behalf of said Scbncider Homes I, LLC. GIVEN under my hand and official scal ylll'-=t",-_day of ~41 k...-2007, \ a (Print Name) Nolllry Public in and for the SlIIle of Washington, residing at Av6 r/t'/!/ My Commission Expires: j{ b 5:j);::U2!fD 0 } / County of King )55. ? On tl)is day personally appeared before me /h~ J?"u.ss" , to me known to be Ibe pmon who signed as L re..~.et.e...n +-ofJ&M Land Development, Inco) the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged said instrumentto be a free and voluntary act and deed ofJ&M Land Development, Inc., for the uses and purposes therein mentioned; and on oath stated that he was authorized fa execute said instrument on behalf of said J&M Land Development, Inc. G~~l11ll51r~I~nd and official seal this J./-J-I.-day of De.~ hc.."--... 2007, ':~'>-""""""\\"',\"\\\thj~111i. • 5 ~~"'-;'\OH:t:Jr.ri'l, ~~ ~ -,'F-'9-:;t.h''-': ~ ff .::t=~ 0 ",ARJ-~~~ ~ -.::;:~:~~ ~~;;:, ~~o.-~~ ~ ~o ; ,C> j~~ ~ \ \ U'6~· ,".ffJ::.ff (Print Name) ~ lP;-'i 1r. ')~W ~~0 ~ . "'11, 1;'ltl: '. -\~, _ .~~ ff Notary Publi I and fvr the State of Washington, ""IIt: OF "'Np..~,~ .... ~ residing at 1- 11\\\\\\"\\\\,,, My comnuc'ss"'I"'o"n':E':xp-'-:ir'-e-s-: '""";'o,-t:Z-'"'q-;cc-r=,..O-,"-;--- Agreement and Easement for Drainage Facility 4 20080104001145.006 )ss On this day persona.lly appeared before me C \ ,'f£. P GroIn/I:" ,10 me known to be the person who signed as roaJ111,tS.£.1 of 4th & Bremerton, LLC, the limited liability corporation that executed the within and foregoing Instrument and ilcknowledged said instrument to be a free will and voluntary act and deed or41h & Bremerton, LLC, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned; and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument on behalfofsaid 4111 & Bremerton, LLC. :"!:I. .... , ... '''''\''~ , ......... b.. A. AlI~' GIVEJ::!. •• iQ.~!!U'.~.~~ .. j~p'!liCial seal this ~ day of D('cem be.< :-0,\:'~~SION k;;" ~ " ) f ~(/' ",OTl>'ft ~,~/~~ ~ DAI\cl J; ,A AlWM fAA ~; I-~: ~ I-<en~ ru A Nlli roO n i":. cnl:U~ : ~. , 2007. <:; (J') ~ Pl.J C :: (pnntName) ~,~ .... BLI ~/ ~ i Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, III/,~':··~·<!S.OS""$-O 5 residing at ThM.-nS iD(I COILn iy 1" •• Op·WAii~\\~ .,or-My Commission Expires: s., pi 25 -lJ)Or. \,\\\\'\.'\. ....... , ... ~ .......... STATE OF WASHINGTON County of King )ss On this day personally appeared before me Dr. Kim A. Nicholas, to me known to bethe individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free will and voluntary act anll. ~~ed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. ~ ... , ... , .. ~ \HIIII ~~'" ELll'" II", . ~ '\))\d~(,}.n~d and official seal this I).. day of 1,,6::J:£ttU!~.;-2007. :-s:-~~\SS}OJl. 'I, A\ ~ ---~ .; ~V<-' or. 'r~/~-~ ~ ~ = ~Q ~ ~~ ~~~.~ ~~~~iZ~~~~~~~~~~~~===== ;f/)~ , ~ ~~~~ ~-\~ --0 .... t:.~ $ ~ ~ ? "hUC j E (Print Name) ~ ~ 't. ':,,' $"': Notary Public i ""/ c{;; ........ o~1' .. ~~.a 11/;1.; ::> ·~;1\\\'"''''''1.0 ~ residing at ::-:.L.~,",,"~--,;;:-r;;-;;-"T.;;-:C;C;--- IiI', ~;ASH\\'iG .,.-;:-.... My Commlssion Expires: . . 2.01 • Illhl\\\""'", .... , ....... STATE OF WASHINGTON County of King )ss, On this day personally appeared before me Dr. BnljinderS. BuUar, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the witbin and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free will and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN u!!-.*:""lIl',aand and official seal this Jk.. day of JJeeePnf.ur 2007 ,"""\.I..E M: ~"'~ ~ .-~':.0~"~Wc'\~:i,,,/~"'~1. ~~ J ~ J Ad· I' ~..;;-;-;,'S ... '''~.1.JIt.'1':. ~ [,/_"U.£11 -::~~. OTA~ '-..()/,-,:Q ~ ~l~ 'J. ~;1\~ . R c'1h,FalnCJ< "'§ ~ (print Name) , "'V8L'v /~ j No:a~ PubliC;)~ and,for the State o(Washington, ." JIlt ~ "'00 :~~_ '\ \ ... ..:-~O ~ resldmg at ,..:.,~.=:.-;;:--'-;-_....,.,_. _____ _ SIJI,/t O;:.I:";,,·\\ .• ,~~""r, , .. # My Commission Expires: /0/75 12 () II ~~W~,", I Ihl1\\\ !to,', ......... Agreement and Easeml:\\~ ror Drainage Facility -5 EXHIBIT A (Grantor· Schneider Homes I, LLC) Lot D. City of Renton Hillcrest Square lot line adjustment Number LUA·05·031·LLA. Recorded under Recording Number 20050719900009, said lot line adjustment being a reconfiguration of portions of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of tbe northwest quarter of Sec lion IS, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willameue Meridian, in King County, Washington, EXCEPT the east 10 feet thereof conveyed to the City of Renton by deed recorded under Recording Number 2006 \0 I 7000955. Tax Pareel No .. 1523059034 Agreement and Easement for Drainage Facility-6 20080104001145.007 EXHlBITB (Grantee -4" & Bremerton, LLC) Parect A, Dochnahl Binding Site Plal~ according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 163 of plats, Pages 1 and 2, Records of King County, Washington, situate in the County of King, State of Washington, Tax Parcel No, 2050500010 Agreement and Easement for Drainage Facility -7 20080104001145.008 ---" I I. (Grantee: Dr. Kim A. Nicholas) EXHIBITC Unit B, Renton Highlands Business Center. a condominium, at:cording to the declaration thereof, recorded under King County Recording No. 9406160999; said Unit is located on Survey Mop and Plans filed in Vohune 119 of Condominium Plats, at Pages 8 and 9, in King County. Situate in tbe County of King, State of Washington. Also known as Parcel No. 722700-0020, located at 4505 NE 4"' Street, Renton, WA 98059 Tax Parcel No. 7227000020 2. (Grantee: Dr. Baljinder S. Buttar) Unit A, Renton Highlands Business ('....enter, a condominium recorded in Volume 119 of Condominiums, Pages 8 and 9 inclusive, according to the Declaration illereof, recorded un King County Recording Nmnber 9406160999, and any amendments thereto. Situate in ille COWlty of King, State of Washington. Also known as Parcel No. 722700-0010, located at 4505 NE 4~ Street, Renton, WA 98059. Tax Parcel No. 7227000010 Agreement and Easement for Draioage Facility -8 20080104001145.009 ) EXHlBITD (Grantee: J&M L~nd Development, Inc.) l.ots 2 and 3 of King County Short plat No. 675015, Recorded under Recording No. 7509050645, Records of King County, Washington. Also known as Parcels Nos. 1523059035 and 1523059193,locnted at 320 Bremerton Avenue NK Tax Parcel Nos. 1523059035 and 1523059193 Agreement and EnselDent for Drainage Facility.9 20080104001145.010 RETURN ADDRESS: Larry L Barokas BAROKAS MARTIN & TOMLINSON 1422 Bellevue Avenue Seaule, WA 98122 '1~(1"'1I1I1I1 PCHICRGO TrTLE E~400s1146 0 A.E001 OF 011 2.00 1/04/2008 13'48 KING COUNTY, ilR WASHINGTON STATE RECORDER'S Cover Sheet (ReW 65.04) 20080104001146.001 Document Title(s) (or transactions contained therein): (all areas applicable to your document must be filled in) 1" EElsement Agreement 2 3 4. Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned 0 ... released: Additional reference #)s on page ___ of document Grantor{s) (Last name first, then first name and initials) L 4'" & Bremerton, LLC 2. Nicholas t Dr, Kim A, 3. B "ttar, Dr. Baljinder S. 4. __ Additional names on page of document Granlce(s) (Last name first, then first name and initials) I. J&M Land Developmen!, Inc:, CKICAGO mlE INS co([!) 2 REF# Wb f'o.l 00/-10 .1. - 4. __ Additional names on page of document Legal description (abbreviated: i.e. lot, block, plat or seclion, township, range) Par".,1 A, Dochnahl Binding Site Plat, recorded in Volume 163 of plats, Pages I and 2 _X __ Addi1ion.llegal is on pages 7 and 8 of document Assessor's Property Tax ParceUAc:count Number _L Asses50r Tax # 1523059035, 1523059193, 2050500010, 7227000020, 7227000010 The Auditor/Recorder wiIJ rely on the infonnation provided on the fonn. The staffwiIJ not read the document to verify the accuracy or completeness of tl,e indexing infonnation orovided herein. Return Address: Larry L Barokas Barol,.s Martin & Tomlinson 1422 Bellevue Avenue Seattle, WA 98122 20080104001146.002 EASEMENT AGREEMENT Reference # (Please print las[ name first) Grnnlor(s): (I) 4'" & Bremerton LLC (2)Nicholas, Dr. Kim A. (3)Buttar, Dr Baljinder S Add'J on pg_ Grantee(s); (1) J&M Land Development, Inc. Add'i on pg_ L.egal Description (abbreviated);P.rcel A,Dochnahl Binding Sile Plat, Vol163 of Plats Add'llegal on pg 7 & g Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account # 1523059035, 1523059193,2050500010, 7127000020, 72270000 I 0 TillS AGREEMENT is made this,:? ff,-day of Off re, G-o ,2007 between 41h & Bremerton, LLC and Dr. Kim A. Nicbolas and Dr. Baljinder S. Buttar and their respective successors or assigns (uGrantors" herein) and J&M Land Developmentt Inc. and its successors or assigns r'Grantee'· herein). A. Grantors are the owners of the properties legally described on Exhibit A which is attached hereto and incorporated herein; and, B. Grantee is the owner of the property legally described on Exhibit B, which is altached hereto and incorporated herein. C. Grantors and Grantee wish to grant, warrant and convey to each other cross easements to direct the flow of storm water over, under and across their separate properties and which benefit said properties. NOW THEREFORE, for valuabie consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged Grantors and Grantee agree as follows: i. Right of Access for Construction. Grantors grant a temporary right of access onto Grantors' properties to Grantee for the purpose of allowing Grantee to regrade and install landscaping hereinafter referred to as "Construction Work" as described on the ESM drawing dated August 27,2007, attached as Exhibit C. The area nec.essary forthe "Construction Work" is referred to as an "Easement Area" and shall be constmcted so as to direct the flow of storm water over, under and across the Exhibit A or Exhibit B properties to a drainage pipeline located on adjacent property owned by Schneider Homes I, LLC (the "Schneider Property'} The Schneider Property is the subject of an easement recorded under i)looio)o «Oci/'1!7 (lire "Schneider Easement"). The parties hereto and their respective Exhibit A and B properties shall be deemed to benefit from this Easement Agreement. Easement Agreement-I ) ) 20080104001145.003 2. Easemcnt Grant. To the extcnt storm water flows over, under and across the Exhibit A and B properties, the respective owners grant. convey and warrant to each other an exclusive. perpetual and permanent easement 3. Elevations and Dimensions. The approximate elevations and dimensions of the Conslructioll Work shall be: 3 I Top elevation of proposcd grading-408 feet plus or minus abovc mean sea le\'cl 3.2 Elevation at edge of parking lot·412 above mean sea Icvel 3.3 Approximate depth of fill at the propcrty line separating Grantors and Grantee-s properties is plus or minus 6 feet 34 n,e fill area will project 16 fcet plus or minus onto Grantors' property 3.5 Distance from top of fill to existing parking lot 12 feet plus or minus 4. Landscaping. The landscaping shall approximate, as close as reasonably possible, that shown on Exhibit C. Grantee shall provide for neceSS31Y erosion control to prevent landslides or oll,er soil subsidence during the work. 5. Ingress and Egress. Grantee shall complete all of the Construction Work no later than December 31, 2008 at which time the right of ingress and egress for that purpose shaillenninate. 6. Maintenance, Grantee shall maintain the Easement Area during the course of the Construction Work at its sole cost and expense and keep the same in a safe condition and maintain the trees shown on Exhibit C for a period of one (1) year from installation. Witl,out limitation, Grantee shall install and maintain, and keep in good working order the stonn drains system on Grantors' and Grantee's property and the Schneider Property, including the pipeline, which may extend from 4" and Bremenon Property to Granlee's property and through tile Schneider Property, Grantee shall comply with all rules, regulations and laws applicable to the Easement Area at its soJe cost and expense. Grantee shall comply with all rules. regulations and laws applicable to the Easement and shall be responsible for obtaining all permits and keeping the same in full force and effect for the time necessary. J&M's obligation to maintain the landscaping and gradingsitall terminate upon completion ofth. Consl!uction Work. 7, Indemnification. Grantee shall indemnifY and hold Grantors hannless from all losses, costs, expense and HabiIities incJuding reasonable attorneys fees and court costs incurred, arising out afor relating to the grant of this Easement or any act or omission by Grantee, its agents, invitees, employees and contractors in the performance of any of its obligations. 8 Insurance. Grantee shall require its agents and contractors pe/fonning work on the Exhibit A property, at Grantee's direction, to carry workman"s compensation insurance required by Washington law and commercially reasonable comprehensive general liability coverage for injury to or death to persons or damage to property arising out of or related to this Easement Agreement or any act oromission by Grantee, its agents. invitees, employees and contractors in the performance of any of its obligations in amounts not less than $1,000,000.00. The aforementioned insurance policies shall name Grantors as an additional insured. Grantee shan provide a certificate of the insurance to Grantors on requesl The insurance company issuing said policy shall be licensed to do business in tlle State of Washington. Easement Agreement-2 20080104001146.004 9. Restrictions on Grantee's UseofEascmcntArca/Damage. Grantee shall use the Easement Area only as necessary for (he purpose described in this Easement Agreement and shall use its best efforts not to interfere with the Grantors' use and enjoyment afthe property, Grantee acknowledges lhat Grantors operate re!ail facilities and shall not block or in any way rcstrict access to or from the Grantors~ properties or in any other way interfere with the Grantors' use of their properties. Grantee shall keep the Easement Area free and clear of debris at all times Bnd shall not use the Easement Area for storage of material Grantee agrees to repair all damage caused to any part of the Grantors' properties caused by Grantee, its employees, agents or contractors which obligation shall include, but is not limited to~ the replacement of any trees removed to accommodate Grantee's easement and shall restore Grantors' properties following any Grantee work tllereon to the same or better condition than it existed prior to the damage. 10. Grantors Use or Easement Area. Grantors may not erect on the Easement Area any building or other improvement that would interfere with Grantee's easement rights hereunder without the prior written consent of Grantee, which may not be unreasonably withheld, and which consent shall be deemed to have been granted if Grantee fails to object in writing on or before the 10'" day following Grantee's receipt of Grantors' notice intended action. Grantors reserves the right to use the Easement Area for any purpose with the rights granted Grantee herein. 11. Pel'manenl Easement The easements granted herein are appurtenant to and shall run with the properties described in Exllibil A and ExhibitB as easements and equitable servitudes and not easements in gross. This easement shall be binding upon the properties benefiting thereto and all persons owning. purchasing, leasing or occupying said properties and their respective heirs, successors and assigns. 12. Default. If Grantee shall at any time violate any of the terms, covenants or conditions contained herein or fail to perform any of its obligations in a timely fashion, Grantors shall have the right to declare this Easement Agreement null and void and of no further force and effect. Upon such el'ent J&M shall promptly remove any improvement from the EasementArea and return the Easement Area to Grantors in the same condition as it existed when it was received by Grantee. 13. Alt.rnative Dispute Resolution. In the event ofany dispute concerning the interpretation or enforcement of any proVision herein, the malter shall be resolved by alternate disputes resolution by submission to the Washington Arbitration and Mediation Service (WAMS). The parties agree to first submit the malter for mediation. If not successfully medi.ted, the dispute shall be resolved by arbitration and the arbitrator shall be empowered to award attorney's fees and costs, including those incurred for expert witnesses, to the party that substantially prevails. 14. As-Builts. Upon Grantors' request, Grantee shall promptly provide Grantors with as-built drawings and a survey showing the location and depth ofthe drainage facility on Grantors' property. 15~ Notice. Notice is required to be in writing under this Agreement and shall begin as follows: GRANTORS: 4~ & Bremenon LLC Attn: Cliff Godwin 7319 Bowlyn Place South Seattle, WA 98118 Easement Agreement-3 Dr. Kim A. Nicholas 4505 NE 4'" Stree~ # B Renton, W A 98059 Dr. Baljinder S. Buttar 4505 NE 4" Street, # A Renton, W A 98059 GRANTEE; J&M Land Development, Inc. Post Office Box 2566 Renton, WA 98056 20080104001146.005 WHEREFORE, Grantors and Grantee have executed this Agreement as of the date first abo,'. written Easelnt!nt Agreement -4 GRANTORS: 41h & BREMERTON, LLC ~;:~~ BY--L.!(JI1.::.:..., ---.<:i.-",=,_"",O_. -----'21a~. "",' '-=- Dr. Kim A. Nichol"s GRANTEE: J&M Land Development, Inc. ) 20080104001146.006 STATE OF WASHINGTON On this 2.1 .< day of Decem b-o-:c 2007, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared e I If£. P bncLV'/1 h' to me, known [0 be the person who signed as fb /J..", 0 ~ of 4 1h & Bremerton, LLC, the limited liability corporation that executed the wilillarld foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be a free and voluntal)' act and deed of 4'1'1 & Bremerton j LLC for the uses and purposes therein mentioned; and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument on behalf of said 4th & Bremerton, LLC. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this ~ day of Di'r c robe C 2007. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) County of King )ss. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at -rhu cSiQ() Co 14 v My Commission Expires: ,$. P:WJY\ bgr :25; 1fY>YC On this day personally appeared before me Dr. Kim A. Nicholas, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free will and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this.lL... day of I::r:fem flfr- 2007. Easement Agreement·5 20080104001146.007 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) County of King )ss 0" this day personally appeared before me Dr. BaljinderS. Buttar, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrumenland acknowledged that he signed the same as his free will and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes Iherein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this 12-day of 1>[' 6-l2-m 1fJ-e,~ 2007. Notary Public in,and f9r the State of Washington, residing at,-:;.J-=<.(!...{A7rc::-'-':-_---,-:::-;c-:-;--c-____ _ My Commission Expires: 10/£1 1011 , STATE OF W ASHlNGTON ) County Of King )ss. On this /l..-day of Ol-ee,m Jo&r 2007, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State 'BOf Washington, duly commissioned and sworn." per,onaJly appeared mtlJ2(.. aILS-SD ~ to me, known to be the person who signed as ~r""',d<znt:. of J&M Land Development, Inc., the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be a free and voluntary act and deed of J&M Land Development, Inc., for the uses and purposes therein mentioned; and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument on behalfofsaid J&M Land Development, Inc. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this ---1L day of ber'£fn b,e.r= 2007. Easement Agreement -6 "-1Y7Lf~.ft&7'l7 ~ -&~OILe m, r-f.iJrK.e,.., Notary PuhU, jn and Jor the State of Washington, residing at~:''42.-===:=_rr::r-''':---;-"'''=,,-=-_:_----- My Commission Expires: /0 Z, 26 { EXHIBIT A I c (Grantor: 4 TH & Bremerton, LLC) Parcel A, Dochnahl Binding Site Plat, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 163 of plats, Pages I and 2, records of King County, Washington, Situate in the County o[King, State o[Washingtonc Tax Parcel No. 2050500010 2. (Grantor: Dr. Kim A. Nicholas) Unit B, Renton Highlands Business Center, a condominium, according to the declaration thereof, recorded under King County Recording No. 9406160999; said Unit is located on Survey Map and Plan, filed in Volume I 19 of Condominium plats, at Pages 8 and 9, in King County. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. Also known as Parcel No. 722700..0020, located at 4505 NE 4'1> Street, Renton, W A 98059c Tax Parcel No. 7227000020 3. (Grantor: Dr. BaUinder S. Buttar) Unit A, Renton Highlands Business Center, a condominium recorded in Volume 119 of Condominiums, Pages 8 and 9 inclusive, according to the Declaration thereof, recorded under King County Recording Number 94061 60999, and any.mendments thereto. Situate in the County of King, State o[Washington. Also known as Parcel No. 722700-0010, located at 4505 NE 4 '10 Street, Renton, WA 98059. Tax Parcel No, 7227000010 Easement Agreement -7 20080104001146c008 EXHIBIT B (Grantee -J&M Lond Development, Inc.) Lois 2 and 3 of King County Short plat No. 675015, Recorded under Recording No. 7509050645, Records of King County, Washington. Also known as Parcels Nos. 15230590350nd 1523059193, located at 320 Bremerton Avenue NE. Tax Parcel No. 1523059035 and 1523059193 Easement Agreement -8 20080104001146.009 20080104001146.010 EXHIBITC Attach ESM drawing dated 8/27/07 f?~ ~ J ..-J..... s~ ... "/; ~..... ,..~ .. el~:> n '" ~ b v &02 ()! gtf 9 O()O() if Easement Agreement -9 I I I r ) .M Ul11lam A. BIt •• 2]613 s. !~ 126t:h R~tQn. U.lhlngtun 9805~ Tv; Lot 35 Subdlv. No. 67501, W ARRANIT DEED the Welt 22.S f~et of th~ folloving d~.crlb~d property: The s. ~. \ of the N.W. \ of the N.t.~ of the H.~.\ in Section 15. rown.hip 23 Porth, Range 5 Ealt, W.M •• in King County. W~ar,lngton. R/W 13~t:h Ave. S.t. IU«l",h4" _ilh Ih~ riltht hI fllnlu' 1111 nt'(t''''~llr~ .. lupt'1II fur C1Ilft Ind fill_ upon Iht' Ahuttinlt pruperty 1m I:"&rh .ide!' "f In)o' roed whiC'h ill Ilu"', lit mil)' I.K" ('ntI'CrueteoJ hl!rl!.ftC!f on •• id Pl'uprl1.),.:in run[utl'l'li\.:. wHh ""and,rd plan II lind 'p'ciricIli,,",, tor hi,hwllY purpo~u, .nd 10 th(" .. nmt.' I'~ll"nl AI'III plJlpl/~C'~ u if the ri,lli. ht'frin ,r.ntrtl hod hr'rn Inluirt'"d [)y cllndl"mnlli"n 1II'I.ott"~dinlt:. und!'r J.;mio{Ont ll,"mftin _t_tul"" u(thl' Slal.e-n(Wuhinj(I'1II , A. o. 1 .... ;i?s::"' ' "It' • UO,,), "" ~~ /" ," ".: ",' "/'.:."'" .-.. -::.,1'" 21~1i.· ~"""".:q, " " r ) J = ..... B STAn: OF WASNnlGTON COUNTY OF lING ~ On Ih. et'l -<Ia,.r. .... _. ,;r "Iy. .. , 10 .. ,7. .... 0.1 .... m" • NOtary' I't!blle In Uld lor the BtaU: or ';AIh1n&ton. dWy ~oruml:u1oned lind lI'trOm. penonUl, (:&lDe.W.dlJ. .... ..ro. "' _if.n.d. ti.oldl;!!,~}.u .. d .ff~.lrA-t.~,/,,,· P, .. ,'tt .. lom.kno1mlnbolholndhldu.! S d(jlcrt~ In &ndi:n~1 ext'Cu~ 1he wtthtn uulrumenl and acknawlq-t'd to me thJ;r,L-f.h·e..Y.J.lgned and -.led Lb~ l&1De" tJJ.lI:.l":'ro-; froe nnd \,olunlary a.c:t. and doed far the WCI &oct put'pOIU therein menUono:d.. Wit""'" my hand w.t/d omcla1 Ie&I Ole day and ,eat BTATE' OF WASHINOTON. I .. r CoU1fTl' or KtJ'lo, On "'I> day 01 before IDe peoon&lJy .pp~ed and to me known to be the of th! corporaLlon that ex~ut.M the 'oregol.n~ lrulrument. and &CluloWledged &a.l~ iMtrumenL to be the free and voluntary a.c1. Bnd dffi:1 or uJd corporation. lor Lht wes and purpo6t' therein men~ Uon~, and on oath ,t.aLed Lhnl authorized to ex.ecuLe wd irut.:ument and ~t the /Ie1L.I aJrIxed I.e: UJe corpora ~t seal of said corporation. Gtvcn under my hand find official .ell Ihe day and yc::u Int lbove writlen. ~~.--.~-"' . Nafar, '-blkt' il'l {lilt /01' lM llttU~ pI W",h1"91071. Iu:.ritIln, GJ Cl ~ ~ 1f , , ~ ~ ~ 3 !Ji i~ [ ~ ,- ~ ~ Ii it Q ~ ,< a ! I !( ; 1 i g (I) ~ .. 1 .; 1 , i § I I I j ~o 'ii 11 ] I i >-= E , £ 4 ~ I ~f I I j ] ~ " ; ~ 5 1 t I & Ii -' 11 • tit CuliL/fO " ,i:OUEU .I. rm JJL 31 ~ 8 ;10 D~E.C. tvh "I. ,rlU~ 10- ElECTJON~~"I'U .. cu. yr", DEPUTY FILED for R F eoord at R IRST AMEnlCAN TeQuest of ~ooo. 2"d r,.,""U~ ITLE eoatl/e W . w .. • iJ;;;/411tMI.:Jn 98104 ... ~ \ I I CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT 1055 S GRADY WAY RENTON, W A 98057 12/14/2007 NonCE OF LIEN FOR UTILITY SERVICE CITY OF RENTON vs.1A YMARC DEVELOPMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Renton, State of Washington, has and claims a lien for utility charges against the following described premises situated in King County, Washington. Said lien is claimed for delinquent utility charges and penalties and is also cJaimed for future utility charges against said premises. Property Address 320 BREMERTON AV NE Lien Amount $244.61 Utility Account No 031771-000 Pursuant to Renton Municipal Code, Title VIII, Chapter I, 8-1-8, Chapter 2, 8-2-1, Chapter 4,8-4-12 and Chapter 5,8-5-16, and Revised Code of Washington, Chapter 35, "Such charges and penalties shall be a lien against the herein above described real properties. II I, Linda Parks, Fiscal Services Director of the City of Renton Finance Department, King County, Washington, hereby certify that the above referenced account is delinquent in the sum stated. Linda Parks Fiscal Services Director Cily ofRenlon 620)77 / Page 1 of! 20080104001019.001 CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT 1055 S GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98057 12/1412007 ) NOTICE OF LIEN FOR UTILITY SERVICE CITY OF RENTON vdA YMARC DEVELOPMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Renton, State of Washington, has and claims a lien for utility charges against the following described premises situated in King County, Washington, Said lien is claimed for delinquent utility charges and penalties and is also claimed for futwe utility charges against said premises_ Property Address Parcel No Lien Amount 330 BREMERTON AV NE 1523059035 $244,61 Utility Account No 031771-001 Pursuant to Renton M\ll1icipal Code, Title VIII, Chapter I, 8-1-8, Chapter 2,8-2-1, Chapter 4,8-4-12 and Chapter 5,8-5-16, and Revised Code of Washington, Chapter 35, "Such charges and penalties shall be a lien against the herein above described real properties" I, Linda Parks, Fiscal Services Director of the City of Renton Finance Department, King County, Washington, hereby certify that the above referenced account is delinquent in the sum stated, Linda Parks Fisca1 Services Director City of Renton 620420 Page I of I 200B0104001020,001 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING • TRANSPORTATION PLANNING 2802 WETMORE AVE .• SUITE 220 • EVERED, WA 98201 • PH: (425) 339-8266 • FAX: (425) 258-2922 October 13,2008 Ms. Kayren Kittrick, Development Engineer Supervisor City of Renton, Public Works Department 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Orange Grove Cottages, 25 Residential Units: Traffic Impact Analysis GTC Project No. 08-176 Dear Ms. Kittrick: , '-~, Gibson Traffic Consultants (GTC) has been retained by Marc Rousso of J ayMarc Development Inc. to conduct a traffic study to satisfy City of Renton requirements for the proposed Orange Grove Cottages, a 25 unit, residential development in the City of Renton. The City's concerns, in particular, are the potential conflicts with NE 3'd Lane, which is offset across from the southern development access. This technical memorandum summarizes the following elements: existing 2008 and future 2009 Level of Service (LOS) analysis for weekday PM peak traffic conditions at the access locations on Bremerton Avenue NE. trip generation. trip distribution. operational safety impacts, and recommended mitigation measures for the proposed residential development. PROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENT & ACCESS The proposed Orange Grovc Cottages residential development is located along the east side of Bremerton A venue NE opposite NE 3'd Lane in the City of Renton. A site vicinity map has been included in Figure 1. The site is currently occupied by two single-family houses which will be removed with the development. The proposed residential development will consist o[ 25 total units; 6 townhouse units and 19 single-family units. The proposed development is scheduled for construction and full occupancy by the year 2009. For the driverway intersection level-of-service analysis, the year 2009 has been used as the future horizon year. Developmennt trips will access the surrounding roadways through two driveways to Bremerton Avenue NE: the northern and southern accesses. The southern access is approximately 40 feet offset to the south from the NE 3,d Lane on the opposite side of Bremerton A venue NE. The northern access is approximately 130 feet to the north [rom the centerline of NE 3'd Lane. A proposed site plan has been included in the attachments. COUNTS/SURVEYS· SITE IMPACTS· LOS ANALYSIS· EIS • HEARINGS· SAFETY· SIGNALS· PARKING Ms. Kayren Kittrick October 13, 2008 Page 2 METHODOLOGY Study Intersections & Traffic Volumes Based on the City of Renton's traffic impact guidelines, GTe performed PM peak-hour level of service (LOS) analysis at the two development access intersections: NE 3" Lane/southern access at Bremerton A venue NE for the existing, baseline and future conditions and the proposed northern access/Bremerton Avenue NE for the future conditions. GTC staff conducted a new weekday PM peak-hour turning movement (TM) count at the intersection of NE 3'd LanelBremerton Avenue NE on October I, 2008. Existing 2008 PM peak-hour turning movement volumes are shown in Figure 2. The baseline traffic volumes were determined by utilizing a 2.0% annually compounded growth rate, consistant with growth rates used for past GTC projects in the site vicinity, to the horizon year of 2009. The future with development traffic volumes were determined by adding the development's traffic volumes to the baseline traffic volumes. Traffic to be generated hy the Orange Grove Cottages development has been estimated using trip generation data published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation, 7th edition. Based on existing travel patterns (from TM counts) and employment and retail destinations in the site vicinity, GTC estimated the likely trip distribution of site traffic to the adjacent City road system. Level of Service Traffic congestion is generally measured in terms of level of service (LOS). Peak-hour level of service at critical off-site intersections was determined using the methodology described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). In accordance with the HCM, road facilities and intersections are rated between LOS A and F, with LOS A being free flow and LOS F being forced flow or over-capacity conditions. The level of service criteria is listed in Table 1. The level of service at signalized intersections is based on the average delay of all approaches. At un signalized intersections, level of service is based on the worstlhighest delay for all intersection movements or approaches. Geometric characteristics and cont1icting traffic movements are taken into consideration when determining level of service values. Per City of Renton standards, the required threshold for satisfactory intersection LOS is 'D' or better. Level of Service (LOS) analyses have been performed for PM peak-hour conditions at all study intersections requested during scoping process. Peak-hour level of service (LOS) determinations at study intersections were made using the methodology described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), and Synchro software (version 7). Matthew Palmer, responsible for the traffic analysis and report, is a licensed professional engineer (Civil) in the State of Washington and a current member of the Washington State section of ITE. Ms. Kayren Kittrick October 13, 2008 Page 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS Road Network The street system in the vicinity of the development site is shown in Figure 1. Site access for the Orange Grove Cottages residential development would be provided via two driveways to Bremerton Avenue NE. NE 4th Street is a five-lane, east-west arterial with a center two-way-Ieft-tum-Iane (TWLTL) and a posted speed limit of 35 mph. NE 4th Street connects to NE 3'" Street to provide access to downtown Renton west of 1-405. There are curb, gutter, sidewalks and landscape sections along the length of NE 4th Street on both the north and south sides of the road. King County Metro provides transit service along NE 4th Street via bus routes 105 and 111 express. Bremerton Avenue NE, which will provide primary access to the development site, is a City local access roadway, perpendicular to NE 4th Street. South of NE 4th Street, Bremerton A venue NE is an undi vided two-way roadway with curb, gutter and sidewalk along the frontage of new developments on both sides of the roadway. The pavement width is 32 feet along the development frontage. The posted speed limit is 25 mph near the site vicinity. NE 3rd Lane is a local access cul-de-sac, west of Bremerton Avenue NE, and provides access to approximately 20 residential units. The assumed speed limit is 25 mph due to residential nature of the roadway. Existing Traffic Volumes GTC staff conducted a new weekday PM peak-hour turning movement count from 4:30 to 6:30 PM on October I, 2008 at the NE 3'd Lane/Bremerton Avenue NE intersection. Figure 2 shows the existing PM peak-hour turning movement volumes at the study intersection. Assuming a typical 'k' factor (peak-tn-daily volumes) of 10%, Bremerton Avenue NE presently carries 970 vehicles daily on an average weekday (A WDT) south of NE 41h Street. NE 3'd Lane carries 120 vehicles daily on an average weekday (A WDT). The capacity of 2-lane roadway with paved shoulders has a carrying capacity of about 12,000 A WDT. South of NE 41h Street, Bremerton Avenue NE has low traffic volumes currently. On Bremerton Avenuc NE, south orNE 41h Street, the average daily volume accounts for approximately only 8% of the roadway capacity (970112,000). Existing Level of Service (LOS) Conditions Using the methodology descrihed in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual and software package from Trafficware Synchro 7IBuild 761 for unsignalized intersections, GTC calculated the existing LOS and average stopped delay at the NE 3'd Lane/Bremerton Avenue NE intersection. Ms. Kayren Kittrick October I 3. 2008 Page 4 For existing PM peak-hour conditions, the intersection operates at LOS A with 9.1 seconds of delay. The City of Renton intersection level-of-service threshold is LOS D. A level-of-service summary has been included in Table 3. FUTURE CONDITIONS Trip Generation Trip generation estimates for the proposed residential development is based on natonal research data for similar land uses contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation, 7th Edition (2003). ITE Land Use Code 210: Single-Family Detached and 230: Residential Townhouse have been used for the single and triplex residential units of the development, respectively. Average trip generation rates have been utilized for estimating daily and AM & PM peak-hour trips for the proposed residential development. For the proposed Orange Grove Cottages residential development, an estimated 202.23 new ADT with 16 new AM peak-bour trips (4 inbound/12 outbound) and 20.65 new PM peak-hour trips (13 inbound/8 outbound) would be generated on an average weekday. Table 2 summarizes the trip generation results of the proposed residential development. Trip Distribution Based on the existing travel patterns (from TM counts) and employment and retail destinations in the site vicinity, GTC estimated the likely trip distribution of site traffic to the adjacent City/State road systems. All site traffic would utilize the Bremerton Avenue NE to access the surrounding road network. It is anticipated that 80% of site traffic will travel along NE 4 1 ), Street; fifty percent to and from the west toward 1-40S and thirty percent to and from the east. The remaining 20% of the site traffic will travel along Bremerton Avenue NE; fifteen percent to and from the north and five percent to and from the south. A detailed trip distribution for the daily and the PM peak-hour trips are included in Figure 3. Background Traffic & Horizon Year The baseline level-of-serice analysis has been performed at the NE 3'd Lane/Bremerton Avenue NE intersection, while the future with development lcvel-of-service (LOS) analyses have been performed at the both access intersections. The baseline traffic volumes were determined by utilizing a 2% annual compounded growth factor to the horizon year of 2009, the anticipated occupancy year. The baseline PM peak-hour turning movement volumes used for the future 2009 LOS analyses are shown in Figure 4. The future with development traffic volumes were determined by adding the development's traffic volumes to the baseline traffic volumes. The future with development Ms. Kayren Kittrick October 13, 2008 Page 5 turning movement volumes used for the future with development LOS analysis are shown in Figure 5. Peak-hour level of service (LOS) determinations at the study intersections were made using the methodology described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) and Synchro software (version 7). Baseline Level of Service (2009) Under the 2009 baseline conditions. the NE 3,d Lane/Bremerton A venue NE. an un signalized intersection, would remam at LOS A with 9.1 seconds of delay. The City of Renton intersection level-of-service threshold is LOS D. A summary of the intersection levels of service has been included in Table 3. Future with Developmeut Level of Service (2009) Based on the site layout, it is assumed that the site traffic of the 16 single-family units, due to the proximity to the southern access, will use the sourthern access. The remaining 6 townhouse units and 3 single-family units will use the northern access. A calculation of the driveway split has been included in the attachments. With the addition of the development trips, the intersection of NE 3'd LaneiBremerton Avenue NE/southern access will continue to opearate at LOS A wifh a slightly increased delay of 9.3 seconds. The intersection of Bremerton Avenue NE/northern access will operate at LOS A wifh 8.4 seconds of delay. A summary of the intersection levels of service has been included in Table 3. Access Sight Distance, Channelizatiou, Accident & Spacing Analysis The City of Renton utilizes the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officals (AASHTO) guidelines for the sight distance requirements. Based on the 25 mph posted speed limit along Bremerton Avenue NE in the site vicinity, 155 feet of stopping sight distance and 280 feet of entering sight distance are required. Based on field measurements by GTe staff, there are greater than 280 feet of sight distances to both the north and south from the two proposed access locations. The level-of-servie analysis at the intersection has been analyzed using Trafficware's Synchro 7 software, which has the capability establishing offset intersections. Based on the Synchro analysis, the intersection will operate at LOS A in fhe future with development conditions. With the planned frontage improvements (curb, gutter, sidewalk and setbacks), the southern access will have adequate sight distance to NE 3'd Lane and along Bremerton Avenue NE. Without a center two-way-left-turn-Iane (TWLTL) along Bremerton Avenue NE in the site vicinity, the intersection will essentially operate as a four-leg/cross intersection. Left-turn channelization analyses were conducted at the two access IDcations along Bremerton Avenue NE on the southbound approach using WSDOT Design Manual Left-Turn Storage Ms. Kayren Kittrick October 13, 2008 Page 6 Guidelines Figure 9JO-12a. Due to the low overall volumes along the roadway, the left-tum channelization will not be warranted at either of the access locations. The left-tum channelization warrant analyses at the two access locations have been included in the attachments. In addition, the left-turn channelization will increase the potential points of conflict at the southern access location with the left-turning vehicles from NE 3'd Lane. Therefore, it is not recommended to stripe left-tum channelization along Bremerton Avenue NE at the site access locations. Without a left-turn channelization or a TWLTL, there will not be any additional points of conflict from a normal four-leg/cross intersection at the NE 3'd Lane/Bremerton Avenue NE/southern access location. At present, based on a 'k' factor (peak-to-daily volumes) of 10%, the Bremerton Avenue NE carries approximately 970 average daily trips, accounting approximately only 8% of the roadway capacity. The offset intersection should not pose any significant safety issues to the roadway and its users. The last 3-year accident data along Bremerton Avenue NE south of NE 4th Street was requested from the city clerk's office. There were two accidents that happened on the stretch of the roadway in the last three years (January 1, 2005 to December 31,2007); one at a right-angle and one rear-ended. The accidents result in one injury and one property demage only. Based on an estimated 970 average daily trips on a regular weekday along Bremerton A venue NE based on the PM peak-hour turning movement count conducted by GTC staff, the stretech of the roadway has an accident rate of 1.9 accidents per million entering vehicles. An accident analysis summary has been included in Table 4. However, all of the accidents occurred at the NE 4th Street intersection which is presently unsignalized, two-way stop controlled on the Bremerton Avenue NE approaches with a two-way-left-turn-lane (TWLTL) along NE 4th Street. Therefore, there was not one accident occurrence in the last three-year along the development frontage. Even though the City of Renton has an intersection spacing requirement of 125 feet and the southern access is offset to the south from NE 3'd Lane by approximately 40 feet, the access intersection should operate safely based on the intersection level-of-service analysis, adequate sight distances, overall low volumes of the roadways and zero accident occurrence along the development frontage of the roadway. lustifcations for the Offset The justifications of the offset of the southern access from NE 3'd Lane account two perspectives of the development. First, the development is internally oriented to reduce the impact on the adjacent properties. The internal roadways are placed along the boundaries of the property with the homes oriented toward the center of the site; creating a courtyard. The courtyard will provide a common open space with pedestrian paths to residences. Second, the courtyard has been designed in the architectural perspective as an urban shaped rectangle with linear walks and perpendicular home orientations. By re-aligning the southern access and internal roadway, the site layout and architectural perspectives of the development will be adversely affected, which are crucial to the characteristics of the development. Ms. Kayren Kittrick October 13, 2008 Page 7 Accounting for the offset, the intersection will operate at LOS A with adequate sight distances, low overall volumes and zero existing accident occurrence, posing no significant safety issue; the offset southern access intersection should be deemed acceptable to preserve the site layout and architectural perspectives of the development. MITIGATION Off-Site Mitigation (City of Renton) The City of Renton has established traffic mitigation fees of $75 per new average daily trip (ADT) generated by developments. The estimated weekday daily trips for the development is 202.23 new ADT, which for this proposed development would result in a total mitigation fee of $15,167.25, equivalent to $642.20 per unit of the J 9 SFD units and $494.25 per unit of the 6 townhouse units. A City of Renton mitigation fee summary has been included in Table 5. On-site Acess & Frontage Improvements The following on-site access, roadway and frontage improvements are recommended to provide adequate/safe site traffic access to the proposed residential development and to enhance vehicular/pedestrian travel safety in the site vicinity: • Construct new roadway improvements for Bremerton A venue NE per City of Renton's road design standards, with adequate pavement width plus curb/gutter and 5-foot concrete sidewalks on the development side of the roadway. • Install standard "STOP" signs (Rl-I per MUTCD) on the proposed westbound approach of the two access locations to safely control the site traffic to Bremerton Avenue NE. Ms. Kayren Kittrick October 13, 2008 Page 8 CONCLUSIONS Thc proposed Orange Grove Cottages development is anticipated to generate an estimated 202.23 new ADT with 16 new AM peak-hour trips (4 inboundll2 outbound) and 20.65 new PM peak- hour trips (13 inbound/8 outbound) on an average weekday. The proposed southern access of the development is going to be offset by approximately 40 feet to the south from the NE 3'd Lane on the opposite side of Bremerton Avenue NE. After the analysis, it was found that both the access intersections will operate at LOS A with adequate sight distances to the north and south, zero accident occurrence along the development frontage and overall low volumes along the roadways. The offset of the driveway is crucial to the site layout and architectural perspectives of the development. Therefore, as there are no significant safety issues, the offset intersection should bc deemed acceptable. However, the development should contribute $15,167.25 to the City of Renton as traffic mitigation payments to mitigate the impacts of the development traffic to the sun-ounding city roadway capacities. We trust that GTC's traffic analysis, report and attachments adequately address the traffic impacts of the proposed Orange Grove Cottages development, so that the City of Renton can complete its SEPA review of the proposed residential development. If you have any questions about our analysis or findings, please contact us at (425) 339-8266. Thank you. Sincerely, GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTAJ\TS, INC. Matthew Palmer, P.E. Transportation Planning Engineer Attachments XC: Marc Rousso, JayMarc Land Development Craig Krueger, ESM Consulting Engineers -- z ~w o:z Ww ~?:( 0: NE 4TH 51 Dl - SE 128TH 5T N II, ,p- "'1''0/ ( fL2 -~=--~ :::--::--NE 3RD b!t w }' I I'\, / II '" NE3ROCT .{' "' w w 'I <t z I w 10/08/08 :I: <t SITE 5 :I: I NE 2ND CT :2 ~ w z NE 2ND PL I w 'l z NE 2ND PL 0 •• Z SE 132ND ST ::> /" --,--- . I ~ --------------~ I I NE 1ST PL ! NE 1ST ST w "' w <t . ;':~j? 0 z I N :;! , I SE 135TH ST I VASHON AVE SE SE 136TH ST i --SE 2TH PL _J I \ '~ I ~ \ ! ~ --- ! GIBSON TRAFFIC CoNSULTANTS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GTG #08-176 --------._-- ORANGE GROVE COTTAGES LEGEND FIGURE 1 LJ 25 RESIDENTIAL UNITS PROJECT SITE 4 SITE VICINITY STUDY INTERSECTION MAP CITY OF RENTON ./ i I I II; NE4THST -----~jl----SE128THST ---~ N 1\ '\JI/ --'" (,' -/~r'~- ~ 10108108 NE 3RD CT NE 3RD L ~ --- wr' ~~/~/ ./-// i ~~/~PND,;(-~ NE2NDCT SITE w '" ~ NE 2ND PL w z w '" :t: ~ //-/-//~ §5 //.--\/ ~ ;1\ SE 132ND ST f----- " " I , / ~ ffi , '! I ./ I , ", \ ~~ a~ ", NE1STPL~ NE 1ST ST -~'--~- ( ::~J SE 135TH ST VASHON AVE SE SE 2TH PL '----SIO ,~Q.,;I GIBSON TRAFFIC CoNSULTANTS ORANGE GROVE COTIAGES 25 RESIDENTIAL UNITS CITY OF RENTd LEGEND xx-> PM PEAK-HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES ------ SE 136TH ST ~~. ~ '" 'Il- ~ ~ " ~ TRAFFIC IMPACT S.TUDY J GTG #08-176 FIGURE 2 EXISTING 2008 TRAFFIC VOLUMES PM PEAK-HOUR ~. ... - Z /---'" ~~ 1-/--" (50) ~g: g(~ r 30) \:-./ 101 w" . 61 NE4TH ST 5 "" ~ 6 !!i 2 4 -.0(-~ 2 8 SE 128TH ST N (~~l I, II 12 ~--'\Jlt/ PC: SITE TRIPS --cc=0j I'i-=---~ NE3RD LN w /"'-NE3RDCT '" DAILY", 202 ADT w PMfB=13VPH w II il: z II PM DB = 8 VPH w :I: il: 10108108 SITE 0- 0 :I: NE2NDCT 1 ~ ~ w 1~(5) z NE 2ND Pl ~ w il: 0 z NE 2ND P!:-0 z SE 132ND ST " \--- I -- NE 1ST Pl , NE 1ST ST • w '" w il: c ( SE1STPl 7--) z N ~ SE 135TH ST -----~ VASHON AVE SE _. \ ,~. L7 ~ ~ ",,-~'i'-O '11-. ~----- GIBSON TRAFFIC CoNSULTANTS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GTe #08-176 ----~-- I ORANGE GROVE COTTAGES LEGEND FIGURE 3 AWOT NEW SITE TRAFFIC i 25 RESIDENTIAL UNITS PM .... ·_PEAK (DAIlYIPEAK HOUR) DEVELOPMENT /-----.., TRIP DISTRIBUTION I~~ TRIP DlsmiBUTION % ~ CITY OF RENTON PM PEAK-HOUR ./ NE4THST Inl -----~S~E:-:1-::28:;:T~H;::ST;:--------~--_____j------ N II ~J"c;(_ )C"'I'~ I, I, 10/08108 z ~ w NE _Ure ... , WI " ___ /,-2 ' /" l-~~ / 0 // , ~',/" --/ :!!i O~ , I ..-to \. [' _,' II \, --I I '\ 2 J' 1-\ I ! \ 0 0 I'-' ~ , ",--- NE 1ST Pl / ./ SE 1ST Pl VASHON AVE SE SE 2TH Pl S'i-~~SJS~ GIBSON TRAFFIC CoNSULTANTS LEGEND NE===rrv 2NDPl PM PEAK~HOUR SITE )()(-TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES CITY OF RENTON ST W "' W " :I: l; M 136TH ST l O";'''~:s?~E~~iAi~';r,~~ES ~ ... ~_-L-_________________ _ SE 132NDST W "' W " C ~ W Z W " ~ TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GTe W8-176 ---" FIGURE 4 BASELINE 2009 TRAFFIC VOLUMES PM PEAK-HOUR r; -I z ~UJ o:z UJUJ ITi~ 0: NE4TH ST ro --~ SE 128TH ST N 1', 'I , :'""f/i;~ .. ,\J,,/ 1---___ //--- -~)~f'---------;" ~ W / 0 ',,-2 /" I I " NE3ROCT ---en I m M Wi)" /' 0 UJ II • I "1:) z 'I UJ 10108108 ///'// NE2NDCT SITE ~ \ 1-~ " w ~ \" l'1~ ~ z ~".2N!lPL ~ // "'.,-- / //__ ,-2 E 2ND PL -------~." ,,-/ // ~ -'-SE 132ND ST ~ " _// ::l Orno "-6 \// ! .,.... <0.---... -a , .))'..'0 I _~ __ , I _I \:,':{ ) ---~ -------------NE 1ST PL o -\ .---/,//' NE 1STsr-UJ '" -_/ W ~ C ("'"" ! ; Z N -~J ~ SE 135TH ST ,I VASHON AVE SE SE 13STH ST I SE2TH:) ,-I ~ I ~S' '" '---S;I'. ,,,.<J ~ I t ~ - GIBSON TRAFFIC CoNSULTANTS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GTe #08-176 , ORANGE GROVE COTTAGES LEGEND FIGURE 5 25 RESIDENTIAL UNITS xx--PM PEAK-HOUR FUTURE 2009 TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES TRAFFIC VOLUMES ~CITY OF RENTON PM PEAK-HOUR / Orange Grove Cottages GTe #08-176 TABLE 1 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) CRITERIA Control Delay Level of Expected (Seconds per Vehicle) Service 1 Delay U nsignalized Signalized Intersections Intersections A LittlelNo Delay <;10 <;10 B Short Delays >10 and <;15 >10 and <;20 C Average Delays >15 and <;25 >20 and <;35 D Long Delays >25 and <;35 >35 and <;55 E Very Long Delays >35 and <;50 >55 and <;80 F * >50 >80 * When demand volume exceeds the capacity of thc lane, extreme delays will be encountered with queuing whicb may cause severe congestion affecting other traffic movements in the intersection. Source: Highway Capacity Manual 2000. LOS A: free-flow traffic conditions, with minimal delay to stopped vehicles (no vehicle is delayed longer than one cycle at signalized intersection). LOS B: generally stable traffic flow conditions. LOS C: occasional back-ups may develop, but delay to vehicles is short term and still tolerable. LOS D: during short periods of the peak hour, delays to approaching vehicles may be substantial but are tolerable during times of less demand (i.e. vehicles delayed one cycle or less at signal). LOS E: intersections operate at or near capacity, with long queues developing on al1 approaches and long delays. LOS f: jammed conditions 011 all approaches with excessively long delays and vehicles unable to move at times. Proposed Land Uses Units Residential Townhouse 6 Units Singlc Family Detached 19 Units Single Family Detached -2 Units Total Orange Grove Cottages GTC #08-176 TABLE 2 TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY Average Daily AM Peak-Hour Trips Total Inbound Outbound 39.54 3 1 2 181.83 14 3 11 -19.14 -1 0 -I 202.23 16 4 12 Total 3.48 19.19 -2.02 20.65 PM Peak-Hour Iubound Outbound 2.26 12.09 -1.27 13.08 1.22 7.10 -0.75 7.57 ~ DiID~@[KI1 RAFFle @If!) ~ OJJll u & 1m lF~ Orange Grove Cottages GTC #08-176 TABLE 3 LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY Weekday PM Peak-Hour In tersection Existing 2008 r-~fi~;i';:;~~~~~~;:;:;:----I 1. Bremerton Ave NE Southern AccesslNE 3rd Lane 2. Bremerton Ave NE Northern Access LOS A Includes a 2.0 percent annual growth factor (0 account for other planned/programmed developments in the area. A 9.3 sec A 8.4 sec Orange Grove Cottages GTC #08-176 TABLE 4 Accident Data of Bremerton Avenue NE from NE 4th St to NE 1st St Summary 1 Type Severity Exposure 2 Enter Property Est. Fixed Right Rear Personal Total Time Daily Other at Damage Fatality Object Tum End Angle Only Injury (years) Volume (veh) 0 0 0 I I 1 1 0 2 3 970 I City of Renton records from January 1. 2005 through December 31, 2007. 2 The daily volume entering the intersection is estimated to be approximately 10 times the P!vl peak hour volume. Rate per Year (acc/YT) 0.7 - - per Million Entering Vehicles (acc/mev) 1.9 ~OIID@©[fD RAFFle @1Rl~I1JJIlJr&lRllr~ Orange Grove Cottages GTC #08-176 TABLE 5 TRAFFIC MITIGATION FEES Cost Per Trip Mitigation Fee Mitigation Fee Per Unit Mitigation Type Trip Type Type Trips Total 19 SFD Units* Total Per Unit City of Renton $75.00 ADT 202.23 $15,167.25 $12,201.75 $642.20 * The credit of2 existing SFD units has been applied to the SFD portion of the development. 6 Townhouse Units Total $2,96550 Per Unit $494.25 ~D~l~@[~J RAFFle @iKJ ~ illl!llF [i\ iKJlf~ Trip Generation for: Weekday (a.k.a.): Average Weekday Daily Trips (AWDT) Gross Trips ITE Trip % % In+Out LAND USES VARIABLE LU code Rate IN OUT (Total) Residential Townhouse 6 Units 221 6.59 50% 50% 39.54 Single Family Detached 19 Units 210 9.57 50% 50% 181.83 Single Family Detached ~ 210 ~57 50% 50% -19.14 Total WM /:0/. 202.23 Orange Grove Cottages GTC #08-176 NET EXTERNAL TRIPS BY TYPE IN BOTH DIRECTIONS DIRECTIONAL ASSIGNMENTS Internal TOTAL PASS·BY DIVERTED NEW PASS·BY DIVERTED NEW Crossover LINK LINK % of Trips In+Out % of In+Out %of In+Out In+Out Gross In+Out Ext. Ext. In Out In Out In Out Trips (Total) (Total) Trips (Total) Trips (Total) (Total) 0% 0 40 0% 0 0% 0 40 0 0 0 0 19.77 19.77 0% 0 182 0% 0 0% 0 182 0 0 0 0 90.92 90.91 0% 0 ·19 0% 0 ~ 0 -19 0 0 0 0 ·9.57 ·9.57 0 202 W;;;; 0 0 202 0 0 0 0 101.12 10111 Orange Grove Cottages GTC #08-176 Trip Generation for: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour between 7 and 9 AM (a.k.a.): Weekday AM Peak Hour ----------- NET EXTERNAL TRIPS BY TYPE IN BOTH DIRECTIONS DIRECTIONAL ASSIGNMENTS Gross Trips Internal TOTAL PASS-BY DIVERTED NEW PASS-BY DIVERTED NEW Crossover LINK LINK ITE Trip % % In+Out % of Trips In+Out % of In+Out % of In+Out In+Out LAND USES VARIABLE LU Gross In+Out Ext. Ext. In Out In Out In Out Rate IN OUT (Total) (Total) (Total) (Total) (Total) code Trips (Total) Trips Trips Residential Townhouse 6 Units 221 0.46 21% 79% 2.76 0% 0 3 0% 0 0% 0 3 0 0 0 0 0.58 2.18 Single Family Detached 19 Units 210 0.75 25% 75% 14.25 0% 0 14 0% 0 0% 0 14 0 0 0 0 3.56 10.69 Single Family Detached -2 UnUs 210 0.75 25% 75% -1.50 0% 0 -2 0% 0 0% 0 -2 0 0 0 0 -0.38 -1.12 Total ~ 15.51 V////.-; 0 16 V///.-; 0 V////// 0 16 0 0 0 0 3.76 11.75 I Orange Grove Cottages GTC #08-176 Trip Generation for: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour between 4 and 6 PM (a.k.a.): Weekday PM Peak Hour NET EXTERNAL TRIPS BY TYPE IN BOTH DIRECTIONS DIRECTIONAL ASSIGNMENTS Gross Trips Internal TOTAL PASS·BY DIVERTED NEW PASS·BY DIVERTED NEW Crossover LINK LINK ITE Trip % % In+Out % of Trips In+Out a/I) of In+Out % of In+Out In+Out LAND USES VARIABLE LU Gross In+Qut Ext. Ext. In Out In Out In Out Rate IN DUT (Total) (Total) (Total) (Total) (Total) code Trips (Total) Trips Trips Residential Townhouse 6 Units 221 0.58 65% 35% 3.48 0% a 3 0% a 0% a 3 a a a a 2.26 1.22 Single Family Detached 19 Units 210 1.01 63% 37% 19.19 0% 0 19 0% 0 0% 0 19 0 a 0 a 12.09 7.10 Single Family Detached ~2Units 210 1.01 ~~ -2.02 0% 0 -2 0% 0 ~ 0 -2 0 a 0 a -1.27 -0.75 Total 20.65 ~ a 21 ~ a 0 21 0 a 0 a 13.08 7.57 , Orange Grove Cottages GTC #08-176 Net New Trip Distribution % & Associated Trip Assignments (raw values not corrected for rounding error) AM Version New New AM Peak Hour Trips New New AM Peak Hour Trips % ADT In Out Total % ADT In Out Total 100% 202.23 4 12 16 100o/c 202.23 4 12 16 1% 2.02 0.04 012 0.16 51% 103.14 1.92 5.99 7.91 2% 4.04 0.08 0.24 0.31 52% 105.16 1.96 6.11 8.07 3% 6.07 0.11 0.35 OA7 53% 107.18 1.99 6.23 8.22 4';' 8.09 0.15 OA7 0.62 54% 10920 2.03 6.35 8.38 5' 10.11 0.19 0.59 0.78 55°"; 111.23 2.07 6.46 8.53 6% 12.13 023 0.71 0.93 56% 11325 2.11 6.58 8.69 7% 14.16 026 0.82 1.09 57% 11527 2.14 6.70 8.84 8% 16.18 0.30 0.94 124 58% 117.29 2.18 6.82 9.00 9% 1820 0.34 1.06 1.40 59% 119.32 2.22 6.93 9.15 10% 20.22 0.38 1.18 1.55 60% 121.34 2.26 7.05 9.31 11% 22.25 0.41 129 171 61% 123.36 229 7.17 9.46 12% 24.27 0.45 1.41 1.86 62<% 125.38 2.33 7.29 9.62 13% 26.29 0.49 1.53 2.02 63% 127.40 2.37 7.40 9.77 14% 28.31 0.53 1.65 2.17 64% 129.43 2.41 7.52 9.93 15~ 30.33 0.56 1.76 2.33 65% 131.45 2.44 7.64 10.08 16°;; 32.36 0.60 1.88 2.48 66% 133.47 2.48 7.76 1024 17% 34.38 0.64 2.00 2.54 67% 135.49 2.52 7.87 10.39 18';' 36.40 0.68 2.12 2.79 68% 137.52 2.56 7.99 10.55 19°;; 38.42 0.71 223 2.95 69% 139.54 2.59 8.11 10.70 20°,{ 40.45 0.75 2.35 3.10 70°;; 141.56 2.63 8.23 10.86 21% 42.47 0.79 2.47 3.26 71% 143.58 2.67 8.34 11.01 22% 44.49 0.83 2.59 341 72% 145.61 2.71 8.46 1117 23% 46.51 0.86 2.70 3.57 73% 147.63 2.74 8.58 11.32 24% 48.54 0.90 2.82 3.72 74% 149.65 2.78 8.70 11.48 25°;: 50.56 0.94 2.94 3.88 75% 151.67 2.82 8.81 11.63 26% 52.58 0.98 3.06 4.03 76% 153.69 2.86 8.93 11.79 27% 54.60 1.02 3.17 4.19 77% 155.72 2.90 9.05 11.94 28% 56.62 1.05 3.29 4.34 78% 157.74 2.93 9.17 12.10 29% 58.65 1.09 3A1 4.50 79% 159.76 2.97 9.28 1225 30% 60.67 1.13 3.53 4.65 80% 161.78 3.01 9.40 12.41 31°;: 62.69 117 3.64 4.81 81% 163.81 3.05 9.52 12.56 32% 64.71 1.20 3.76 4.96 82% 165.83 3.08 9.64 12.72 33% 66.74 1.24 3.88 5.12 83O/c 167.85 3.12 9.75 12.87 34% 68.76 1.28 4.00 5.27 84% 169.87 3.16 9.87 13.03 35% 70.78 1.32 4.11 5.43 85% 171.90 3.20 9.99 13.18 36% 72.80 1.35 4.23 5.58 86% 173.92 3.23 10.11 13.34 37% 74.83 1.39 4.35 5.74 87% 175.94 3.27 10.22 13.49 38% 76.85 1.43 447 5.B9 88% 177.96 3.31 10.34 1365 39% 78.87 1.47 4.58 6.05 89% 179.98 3.35 1046 13.80 4011;: 80.89 1.50 4.70 6.20 90°;; 182.01 3.38 10.58 13.96 41% 82.91 1.54 4.82 6.36 91% 184.03 342 10.69 14.11 42°11 84.94 1.58 4.94 6.51 92("10 186.05 3.46 10.81 14.27 43,},( 86.96 1.62 5.05 6.67 93°/c 188.07 3.50 10.93 14.42 44% 88.98 1.65 5.17 6.82 94% 19010 3.53 1105 14.58 45% 91.00 1.69 5.29 6.98 95% 192.12 3.57 11.16 14.73 46% 93.03 1.73 5.41 7.13 96% 194.14 3.61 11.28 14.89 47% 95.05 1.77 552 7.29 97% 196.16 3.65 11AO 15.Q4 48% 97.07 1.80 5.64 7.44 98% 198.19 3.68 11.52 15.20 49% 99.09 1.84 5.76 7.60 99% 20021 3.72 11.63 15.35 50% 101.12 1.88 5.88 7.76 100% 202.23 3.76 11.75 15.51 Orange Grove Cottages GTC #08-176 Net New Trip Distribution % & Associated Trip Assignments (raw values not corrected for rounding error) PM Version New New PM Peak Hour Trips New New PM Peak Hour Trips % ADT In Oul Total % ADT In Oul Total 100% 202.23 13 8 21 1000,.: 202.23 13 8 21 1% 2.02 0.13 0.08 021 51% 103.14 6.67 3.86 10.53 2% 4.04 0.26 0.15 0.41 52% 10516 6.80 3.94 10.74 3% 6.07 0.39 023 0.62 53% 107.18 6.93 4.01 10.94 4% 809 0.52 0.30 0.83 54% 109.20 7.06 4.09 11.15 5'10 10.11 0.65 0.38 1.03 55 0ft 111.23 7.19 4.16 11.36 6% 12.13 0.78 0.45 124 56% 113.25 7.32 424 11.56 7°/0 14.16 0.92 0.53 1.45 57% 115.27 746 4.31 11.77 8% 16.18 1.05 0.61 1.65 58% 117.29 7.59 4.39 11.98 9% 18.20 1.18 0.68 1.86 59% 119.32 7.72 447 12.18 10% 20.22 1.31 0.76 2.07 60'10 121.34 7.85 4.54 12.39 11% 22.25 1.44 0.83 2.27 61% 123.36 7.98 4.62 12.60 12% 24.27 1.57 0.91 248 62% 125.38 8.11 4.69 12.80 13% 26.29 170 0.98 2.68 63% 12740 8.24 4.77 13.01 14% 28.31 1.83 1.06 2.89 64% 12943 8.37 4.84 13.22 15'10 30.33 1.96 1.14 3.10 65°;; 131.45 8.50 4.92 13.42 16% 32.36 2.09 1.21 3.30 66o/c 133.47 8.63 5.00 13.63 17% 34.38 222 129 3.51 6n~ 135.49 8.76 5.07 13.84 18% 36.40 2.35 1.36 3.72 68';' 137.52 8.89 5.15 14.04 19% 38.42 2.49 144 3.92 69% 139.54 9.03 5.22 14.25 20% 40.45 2.62 1.51 4.13 70% 141.56 9.16 5.30 14.46 21% 42.47 2.75 159 4.34 71% 143.58 9.29 5.37 14.66 22% 4449 2.88 1.67 4.54 72% 145.61 9.42 545 14.87 23% 46.51 3.01 1.74 4.75 73% 147.63 9.55 5.53 15.07 24% 48.54 3.14 1.82 4.96 74% 149.65 9.68 5.60 15.28 25% 50.56 3.27 1.89 5.16 75°;; 151.67 9.81 5.68 15.49 26% 52.58 340 1.97 5.37 76% 153.69 9.94 5.75 15.69 27% 54.60 3.53 2.04 5.58 77°/" 155.72 10.07 5.83 15.90 28% 56.62 3.66 2.12 5.78 78% 157.74 10.20 5.90 16.11 29% 58.65 3.79 2.20 5.99 79% 159.76 10.33 5.98 16.31 30 D/i 60.67 3.92 2.27 6.20 80% 161.78 10.46 6.06 16.52 31% 62.69 4.05 2.35 6.40 81% 163.81 10.59 6.13 16.73 32% 64.71 4.19 2.42 6.61 82% 165.83 10.73 621 16.93 33% 66.74 4.32 2.50 6.81 83% 167.85 10.86 6.28 17.14 34% 68.76 4.45 2.57 7.02 84°~ 169.87 10.99 636 17.35 35°": 70.78 4.58 2.65 7.23 85% 171.90 11.12 6.43 17.55 36% 72.80 4.71 2.73 7.43 86% 173.92 11.25 6.51 1776 37% 74.83 4.84 2.80 7.64 87% 175.94 11.38 6.59 17.97 38% 76.85 4.97 2.88 7.85 88% 177.96 11.51 6.66 1817 39% 78.87 5 10 2.95 8.05 89% 179.98 11.64 6.74 18.38 40o/t 80.89 5.23 3.03 8.26 90% 182.01 11.77 6.81 18.59 41 ll/o 82.91 5.36 310 8.47 91% 184.03 11.90 6.89 18.79 42% 84.94 5.49 3.18 8.67 92% 186.05 12.03 6.96 19.00 43% 86.96 5.62 3.26 B.88 93% 188.07 12.16 7.04 19.20 44% 88.98 5.76 3.33 9.09 94% 190.10 12.30 7.12 1941 45% 91.00 5.89 3.41 9.29 95°;; 192.12 12.43 7.19 19.62 46% 93.03 6.02 3,48 9.50 96% 194.14 1256 7.27 19.82 47% 95.05 615 3.56 9.71 97% 196.16 12.69 7.34 20.03 48% 9707 6.28 3.63 9.91 98% 198.19 1282 7.42 20.24 49% 99.09 6,41 3.71 10.12 99% 200.21 12.95 7.49 20.44 50% 101.12 6.54 3.79 10.33 100% 202.23 13.08 7.57 20.65 Project No.: 08-176 Day & Date: Wednesday, 10/1/2008 Project Name: Orange Grove Cottages Time Start: 4:30 PM Time End: 6:30 PM Prepared by: KKC Checked by: Weather: Clear ..::..:.::=------- Location: Bremerton Ave NE at NE 3rd Ln I 4:45 PM I· •• ". 5:00PM ..: 5:15 PM •.•••. 5:30 PM •••• '. 5:45 PM .• ..,' I 6:00 PM . "'" . 6:15PM ., .•. 6:30 PM . ' •. , ... 1 • 4:45 PM I.·.· , .. 5:00 PM I>· .. " , 5:15 PM . " ".' I 5:30 PM ". ". 5:45PM'.".> 6:00 PM" ':. , •• , 6:15PM:",'. I 6:30PM "i' 5:ao to 6:00 PM Pedes 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 trians: 2 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 EB from West on: NB from South on: SB from North on: R ')'{\. L T RHV L T R IHV L T 1 Vlinul:e 1", 'Y" Volumes '< 2 a 0 ,. :..... a 8 '.' < 2 a a . ....•.... a 9 I > 2 a a .... a 12 > 3 a a I ., a 16 :> 3 a a I.":" a 21 . .... ::. 4 a a' a 26 < 4 a a > . 0 30 . .... " .•.• ' 4 a 0 .. '..... 0 3a a> o .. ', .' o ".' ...• al .' al···.··.,··· 01. : •.•... 15 Mmute ntel fal V ,Iumos I 2 0 0 a 8 .• ," 0 0 0'" 0 1 .:'.,' .•. '. 0 0 0 i> 0 3 ... ' .• : '. 1 0 a'Y 0 4 o •... . > 0 0 0 '." > 0 5 1>< 1 0 O· ....••.. 0 5 a I··. I::> 0 0 0 ".'. a 4 o 1< a a 0 I .• ' ..... a 0 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 21 01 01 I 01 171 01 1 0 I i V [\' . I 2 0 -411U 3 a 2J 4 0 VJ, t [4 5 0 I o~ "" l' 6 0 . I \ I b~ or'7 7 0 8 0 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 a 5 0 6 a 7 0 8 0 a 11 2 23 a 18 2 31 a 37 3 54 a 58 4 81 a 69 11 104 a 86 12 128 o 92 12 138 o 104 15 153 o 11 2 23 8 o 7 a 8 81 of9 1 23 97 a 21 1 27 84 o 11 7 23 72 o 17 1 24 o 6 o 10 o 12 3 15 97 I 1 al 681 1al 971 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SHEET ____ OF_---:_ 0;', ,/ BY: __ F'I::L-I"-,--( __ DATE I' (:0, ; ___ DATE __ P R OJ E CT-----'-'-'-'---;.-f-'=~-=-'-'--~---=-___"'_Cc__++=-.L-_=_____o,_____=_ C[-1'?6 SUBJECT I I t ,/ b I Yi'i\iC,tr../C,! / + b c~vlclD 35Fj? if-.in / DvL Ib 5F!/ 2802 WETMORE AVE. #220 • EVERETT. WA 98201 • PH: (425) 339-8266 • FAX: (425) 258-2922 Synchro 10 Existing Average Weekday PM Peak Hour Year 10/7/2008 Data Source GTe Future without Project Average Weekday PM Peak Hour Year: Growth Rate = Years of Growth = Total Growth = 2009 2.0% 1.0200 Total Project Trips Average Weekday PM Peak Hour Future with Project Average Weekday PM Peak Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 12 2 2 0 0 1 Bremerton Ave @ South Access I I 10 0 0 "' " South Access () q " 0 I I 89 10 69 " D South Access 1/ q " 69 97 0 " Bremerton Ave c::E:J Bremerton Ave " o 85 98 0 " Bremerton Ave 0[] Bremerton Ave '" 17 10 " Bremerton Ave Ci:ZJ Bremerton Ave '" 0 115 10 " Bremerton Ave [1lU Bremerton Ave '" 0 87 19 '0 '" " South Access 17 17 19 '" ~ "' South Access o 7 '" ~ 0' South Access fr '" 0 I 26 '" ¢' '" South Access fr 0 18 0 I I 18 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 6 0 0 I 6 0 0 Page 1 of 4 0 --L 0 ~ 0 0 0 6 16 10 6 16 10 t North North t North t North Synchro 10 2 Existing Average Weekday PM Peak Hour Year: 10/7/2008 Data Source: GTC Future without Project Average Weekday PM Peak Hour Year: Growth Rate = Years of Growth = Total Growth:: 2009 2.0% 1.0200 Total Project Trips Average Weekday PM Peak Hour Future with Project Average Weekday PM Peak Hour 2 BremertDn Ave @ NDrth Access Page 3 Df 4 ______ ~I rl ~0~~;:~~0~~9~7~ ____ ~1~9 ____ ~ '" {C '" 0 0 North Access 0 () 0 0 Q 0 " I I 80 0 80 '" ~ 0 0 North Access 0 " 0 0 '" 0 " 80 I I 13 0 10 r? {C o North Access o " 00'" o " Bremerton Ave Bremerton Ave " 99 0 " Bremerton Ave OD Bremerton Ave " 0 99 21 3 " Bremerton Ave Bremerton Ave " o ~ f--,,0---i o North Access 19 0 0 0 North Access r " 19 0 I I 19 8 " 2 <0> 0 r? 0 North Access o o 0 0 0 2 6 4 ______ ~I rl~0~~:~~~3~~1~20~ ____ ~2~7 ____ ~ o o o v o o ¢ o " r? l\ " North Access Bremerton Ave Bremerton Ave " " '"'2;;--r-----, '" 0 2 r? 0 North Access '---1-- 6 --1 4 r-----~9~0------~1716~--0~~~~~~L-~1~1 I t North t North t North t North HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: NE 3rd Ln & NE Bremerton Ave .-1 Movement EBl lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 2 Sign Control Grade Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 2 Pedestrians lane Width (ff) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right tum flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 98 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 98 tC, single (s) 7.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 pO queue free % 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 884 Direction, Lane¥ tEB~1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right cSH Volume to Capacity Queue length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) lane lOS Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection 'Summa!}: Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) Orange Grove Cottages (08-176) Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 2 2 0 884 0.00 0 9.1 A 9.1 A -. "t EBT EBR .;. 0 0 Stop 0% 0.92 0.92 0 0 98 79 98 79 6.5 6.2 4.0 3.3 100 100 792 981 ".V\iElW: ~NBl1 . 0 18 0 0 0 0 1700 1512 0.00 0.00 0 0 0.0 0.0 A 0.0 0.0 A 0.2 14.2% 15 ~ -'- WBl WaT WBR .;. 0 0 0 Stop 0% 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 0 0 98 103 18 98 103 18 7.1 6.5 6.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 100 100 100 884 787 1060 :S81 85 0 11 1598 0.00 0 0.0 0.0 leu Level of Service .,., t ". NBl NBT NBR .;. 0 17 0 Free 0% 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 18 0 None 85 85 4.1 2.2 100 1512 A 10/8/2008 \. + .,; SBl SBT SBR .;. 0 68 10 Free 0% 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 74 11 None 18 18 4.1 2.2 100 1598 ·'/Y"T'" 2008 EXisting Conditions 10/8/2008 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1 : NE 3rd Ln & NE Bremerton Ave / Movement EBl Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 2 Sign Control Grade Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 2 Pedestnans Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (fils) Percent Blockage Right turn ftare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, connicting volume 99 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 99 tC, single (s) 7.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 pO queue free % 100 cM capacity (yeh/h) 883 Dlrection;l:ane#l iEB'ltH Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right cSH Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection'Summa!]! Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization AnalysIS Period (min) Orange Grove Cottages (OB-176) Gibson TraffiC Consultants, Inc. 2 2 0 883 0.00 0 9.1 A 9.1 A -..,. EBT EBR 4- 0 0 Stop 0% 0.92 0.92 0 0 99 80 99 80 6.5 6.2 4.0 3.3 100 100 791 980 'tVlfBif 'NB'f' 0 18 0 0 0 0 1700 1510 0.00 0.00 0 0 0.0 0.0 A 0.0 0.0 A 0.2 14.2% 15 f -'- WBL WBT .WBR 4- 0 0 0 Stop 0% 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 0 0 99 104 18 99 104 18 7.1 6.5 6.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 100 100 100 883 786 1060 'S8'1 86 0 11 1598 0.00 0 0.0 0.0 ICU Level of Service "\ t ".. NBL NBT NBR 4- 0 17 0 Free 0% 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 18 0 None 86 86 4.1 2.2 100 1510 " "'1"" A 10/8/2008 '" + ~ SBL SBT SBR 4- 0 69 10 Free 0% 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 75 11 None 18 18 4.1 2.2 100 1598 " ""''',~" ' 2009 Baseline Conditions 10lBI2008 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: NE 3rd Ln & NE Bremerton Ave / Movement EBl lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 2 Sign Control Grade Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 2 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 128 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 128 tC, single (s) 7.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (sl 3.5 pO queue free % 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 835 D'rection, LaneiJI , :t:Bij , Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right cSH Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection 'Summa!! Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilizalion AnalysIS Period (min) Orange Grove Cottages (08-176) Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 2 2 0 835 0.00 0 9.3 A 9.3 A --+ .. EBT EBR 4- 0 0 Stop 0% 0.92 0.92 0 0 122 80 122 80 6.5 6.2 4.0 3.3 100 100 763 980 :WB"I'~':NBH 7 20 0 0 7 0 1058 1510 0.01 0.00 0 0 8A 0.0 A 8A 0.0 A 1.3 21.5% 15 of -'- WBl WBT WBR 4- 0 0 6 Stop 0% 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 0 7 122 127 20 122 127 20 7.1 6.5 6.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 100 100 99 849 758 1058 'sB:1 97 11 11 1597 0.01 1 0.9 A 0.9 ICU level of Service .." t I' 'NBl NBT NBR 4- 0 18 0 Free 0% 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 20 0 None 86 86 4.1 2.2 100 1510 A 10110/2008 \. ! .; SBl SBT SBR 4- 10 69 10 Free 0% 0.92 0.92 0.92 11 75 11 None 20 20 4.1 2.2 99 1597 2009 Future Conditions 1011012008 HCM Un signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Northern Access & NE Bremerton Ave f Movement WBl Lane Configurations V Volume (veh/h) 0 Sign Control Stop Grade 0% Peak Hour Factor 0,92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right tum flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 132 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 132 tC, single (s) 6.4 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 pO queue free % 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 860 Direction;'Lane#t ·,WBlt' Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right cSH Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS IntersectionSumman: Average Delay Interseclion Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) Orange Grove Cottages (08-176) Gibson Traffic Consullants, Inc. 2 0 2 1048 0.00 0 8.4 A 8.4 A '-t WBR NBT t> 2 25 Free 0% 0,92 0.92 2 27 None 28 28 6.2 3.3 100 1048 NBi1 'S811 28 101 0 3 1 0 1700 1585 0.02 0.00 0 0 0.0 0.3 A 0.0 0.3 0.3 17.2% 15 r ',. i NBR SBl ,SBT 4' 3 90 Free 0" 10 0.92 0.92 0.92 1 3 98 None 28 28 4.1 2.2 100 1585 ICU Level of Service A 1011012008 2009 Future Conditions 10110/2008 i5 25% j ....II [20% ! ::J 15% ~ I-. > :c 10% Orange Grove Cottages GTC #08-176 GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS Bremerton Avenue @ Southern Access -2009 Left Turn Storage Guidelines c ... -------.---"""'-------........ ------ ra -5% needed for capacity Above Curve: Storage recommended. {!. l· •. Below Curve: Storage not ~ o· o 0 Yo -I I I 1----' , i I I T-1 ~~~~-~-,----,-_,-~~~-~_,__,·--r-'--1 f-~ 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Total DHV Total DHV Left Turns: 115 Not on chart 10 Posted Speed Limitl 25 I MPH % Left: 8.7% 1000 Based on WSDOT November 2007 Design Manual: Figure 910-12a. Page 910-26. 1100 1200 .:: 25% Q) ..J 0> 20% t: t: '- ::l 15% I- > ::c 10% Cl .s o I- ~ 5% Orange Grove Cottages GTC #08-176 GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS Bremerton Avenue @ Northern Access -2009 Left Turn Storage Guidelines Above Curve: Storage recommended _B_e~odw.dc~,:,:,_ ~to~a_g_enot ____________ ~ =;; __________ _ nee e lor capacity. o 0% --1 l-r-,--l--r-r---l 1 -T-~ I 300 L_ Total DHV Left Turns: 400 500 120 Not on chart 3 % Lef!: 2.5% 600 700 800 Total DHV 900 Posted Speed Limitl 25 I MPH 1000 Based on WSDOT November 2007 Design Manual: Figure 910-12a, Page 910-26. 1100 1200 Clash Record SrS1em JB Technokl9¥ Inc. Corridor: Corridor Report City of Renton, W A Friday, October 10,2008 BREMERTON AVE NE from lsI St. NE to 4th SI. NE Report Pedod: Saturday, January 01,2005 to Monday, December 31,2007 Comments: Public Records Request -Accident Data -IO/U8/2008 Gibson Traffic Consultants 2802 Wetmore Ave, Suite 220 Everett, W A Fax: 425.258.2922 Ph: 425.339.8266 BREMERTON AVE NE at 4tb St. NE Case- Number Reporl Day Of Nuruber Week Cr~$h Dal~ Crash Time BREMERTON AVE NE at 4tb Sf. NE Case Report D'yOr Crash Crash Num~ef Number Week Date Time 06·1)726A 0600126 Wed 08116.'2006 U5.08 PM 06·11411 0000000 Tue 05.'09/2006 03AS PM Location Type of Cr;~sh Location Type of Cr2,Sh 41h 51. 'IE al BREMERTON AVE NE Rear End 41h SI. NE al BREMERTON AVE NE RighI Angle Page 1 Direction Severity Vehicle lIVe-hike 2. fat rnj POD To' Veh Direction Severity Tol Vehicle tlVehilce 2 Fat Inj PD~ Veh ~T~i~T~ X 2 SB Thru" EB Thru 2 o n ---< , ... ISJ I &l ISJ OJ ... " " ISJ ;u ':2 ---< o z n ---< -< n ,- ~ A o 'Tl n " ~ "-0J GJ m (J] ... m 'lJ tSJ 0J "-GJ (J] Cn:H,~ RIJ.t:(Jrd 5r'>((:'nt Corridor Report City of Renton, W A Friday, October 10, 2008 J8 TCl'hll(llogl· l,n. Corridor: BREMERTON AVE NE from 1st St. NE to 4th St. NE Report Period: Salurday, January 01 , 2005 to tv\onday, December] I, 2007 SEGMENT At 1st SI. NE Between 1 st SI. NE and 1 sl Cl. NE L_ At lsI Cl. NE -------------- Between 15t Ct NE and 2nd SI. N E -------- AI2nd SI. NE , Between 2nd SI. NE and 2nd CI. NE r---. -.. --.-~.-------------- 1 At 2nd Ct NE ,---, Between 2nd CI. NE and 4th SL NE -- AI4th SI. NE TOTALS ---_.- FATAlS INJURIES PD~ TOTALS --------'1------- 0/0 010 0 0 -- 0/0 010 0 0 --+--- 0/0 0/0 0 0 I---om 0/0-01-----0---· -----+'--------~--------~------------+-------------1010 '010-0 0 -------1 1 --- 0/0 , 0/0 ------0 0-- I 010 ! 0/0 0 ° --.-------------;----------_._----___ +_010 i 0/0 O ______ t---__ O __ _ 010 1 1/1 l' 2 · __ ···-····1-··' .. --~ --------i···-·--··~--- , DID 1/1 1 2 Page :;' o n -< I >-' ~ I f\J ~ ~ m >-' " S ffi z -< o z n -< -< p m ;0 A o " n " f\J Ul b- W (S) m Ul >-' m -0 (S) " "-(S) Ul " ~ " Q u " n Crttsh Retord System JB TechnologK Inc, Corridor: Corridor Report City of Renton, W A Friday, October 10,2008 BREMERTON AVE NE from 1st St. NE to 4th SL NE Report Period: Saturday, January 0 1,2005 to Monday, December 31,2007 --------, 2007 2006 -1 2005 T TOTALS SEGMENT --------------------------- o 0 0 + 0 ___ -, Between lsi SI. NE and lsi CL NE 0 0 0 0 At lsi SL NE , AtlstC\. NE 0 0 0 0 AIB2en::~n~~n!l2nd SL NE , "------,--'---~, '--. -. ~ 1'---~--t-~~ Between 2nd 81. NE and 2nd C\. NE .' __ , ___ . 0 : ,-0 -: __ ---H 0 At2n!l Ct. NE _____ _ ,. __ ._' ,.___ i, __ ,_O __ !__ .~_ + _0 _ _ __0 , ___ ~ , " Between 2nd CI. NE and ~th St. NE 0 0 0 t 0 AI 4th 81. NE 0 2, 0 2 TOTALS ---0-" 2--i ---0- , _____ "____ , ___ ,.---.1.. __ .' ___ ' ,-I 2 .• '--, Page 3 o C1 , ... CSJ I I\J CSJ CSJ OJ ... "- "-... ~ o z n -l -( n r m ;u " o ,1 n " I\J Ul L lsi (J) Ul ... (J) CJ CSJ '<' ISJ Ul c o z o " c I w z ~ o z 9 u w o " o , c ~ S ~ , Ii i' ~c::~~ ~:.' , ....... ,"'. -"""'" " : , § , c § c , ~,:-__ ';1.:";L~~j ~ ,--~- '-\~-----~~-~~:-~~~--~ , . '~~-~---::-;\"~~----=='"--=='-=="':-'--'-'-=~=~--'----' ·'yT----- ( ORANGE GROVE COTTAGES PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT NOVEMBER 3, 2008 Prepared for Jaymarc Development ATTN: Marc Rousso 555 South Renton Village Place. Ste 775 Renton. WA 98055 Submitted by ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC 339151"' Way South, Ste.1200 Federal Way, WA 98003 253.838.6113 tel 253.838.7104 fax www.esmcivil.com November 3, 2008 Approved By: King County TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT FOR Orange Grove Cottages Prepared for: Jaymarc Development 555 South Renton Village Place, Ste 775 Renton, WA 98055 Prepared by: ESM Consulting Engineers 33915 1 st Way South, Ste. 200 Federal Way, WA 98003 Job No. 1241-043-006 Date TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Project Overview ............................................................................................................................................... 1-1 2. Conditions and Requirements Summary ............................................................................ 2-1 3. Offsite Analysis ................................................................................................................................................... 3-1 4. Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Analysis and DeSign ..................... 4-1 5. Conveyance System Analysis and Design ........................................................................ 5-1 6. Special Reports and Studies ............................................................................................................. 6-1 7. Other Permits ....................................................................................................................................................... 7-1 8. CSWPPP Analysis and Design ........................................................................................................ 8-1 9. Bond Quantities, Facility Summaries, and Declaration of Covenant .... 9-1 10. Operations and Maintenance Manual .................................................................................... 10-1 Figures 1.1 TlR Worksheet ..................................................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2 Vicinity Map ............................................................................................................................................................ 1-7 1.3 Drainage Basin .................................................................................................................................................. 1-8 1.4 SCS Soils Survey Map ............................................................................................................................... 1-9 4.1 1936 Aerial Photo ............................................................................................................................................. 4-4 4.2 Existing Hydrology Map............................................................................................................................. 4-5 4.3 Developed Hydrology Map.................................................................................................................... 4-6 Tables 4.1 Pre-developed Land Use......................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Developed Land Use .................................................................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Volume Summary.............................................................................................................................................. 4-2 Appendices • Appendix A -Bremerton Ave. Townhomes Preliminary TlR Prepared by Jaeger Engineer, dated Sept 29, 2006 • Appendix B -KCRTS Output • Appendix C -Geotechnical Report 1. PROJECT OVERVIEW The Orange Grove Cottages project is a proposal to construct 24 homes with a mix of simple town homes, detached cottages, and carriage houses on two parcels totaling approximately 1.86 acres. The project is located in incorporated Renton, within King County, Washington and is zoned CA The first parcel (King County parcel identification number 152305-9035) is 1.59 acres located at 330 Bremerton Avenue NE. The second parcel (King County parcel identification number 152305-9193) is 0.27 acres, with no address listed. This project is situated in the NW Y4 of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 Eas~ W.M., King County. Please see Rgure 1.2 for a vicinity map. The proposed project is located in the Lower Cedar River King County Drainage Basin (WRIA #8) within the Cedar River-Lake Washington watershed. The existing property generally slopes to the north with a small section in the southeast corner sloping to the southeast One parcel has a single family home while the other currently has a mobile home on site. Both parcels have sporadic trees with a majority of the site being deep grass. To the west is a previously developed property and to the east a town home complex is currently under construction. To the south is single family home and to the north are commercial buildings. The onsite soil is mapped as Vashon Subglacial Till (Qvt) according to the Geologic Map of King County, Washington and the geotechnical report. This soil is in classification group "D" with high runoff potential according to Table 3.2.2B of the King County Storm Water Design Manual (Manual). See figure 1.4 for a soils map. Please see Appendix C for the geotechnical report prepared by Earth Consulting Incorporated, dated October 1, 2007. The site will be accessed by two private driveways off of Bremerton Avenue NE. The developed basin will be similar in size to the existing drainage basin. Stormwater runoff will be collected and conveyed in a piped conveyance system directed towards a facility consisting of a Stormtech® Chambers in series with a concrete vault to act as one large facility. The storm chambers will be located under the northern road and the concrete vault will be located east of the chambers under the parking stalls in the northeast corner of the site. Basic water quality treatment for the site will be provided by vault which will be used a combine water quality/detention facility. See section 4 for further detail on this facility. The developed site runoff will be released into an existing storm drainage main along Duvall Avenue NE. . It will travel along a pipe/ditch conveyance system until runoff eventually enters Cedar River. See Section Appendix A for the downstream analysis previously submitted by Jaeger Engineering, dated September 29, 2006. \-1 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PROJECT ENGINEER Project Owner JAYMARC DEVELOPMENT Phone (425) 226-9100 Address 555 SOIITH RENTON VII T AGE, PL STEU775, RENTON WA 98055 Project Engineer BRIANNE GASTFIELD Company ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS Phone (251) R~R-hll1 Part 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION [II Landuse Services ~ Subdivison 1 Short Subd, 1 UPD~ o Building Services M/F 1 Commerical 1 SFR o Clearing and Grading o Right-of-Way Use o Other Part 5 PLAN AND REPORT INFORMATION Technical Information Report Type of Drainage Review ~ 1 Targeted (circle): rge Site Date (include revision dates): Date of Final: Part 6 ADJUSTMENT APPROVALS 1 Part 2 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION Project Name ORANGE COUNTY COTTAGES ODES Permit # _________ _ Location Township Range 23N 05E Section _-=1-=5 ____ ~ Site Address 330 BREMERTON AVE NE RENTON WA 98059 Part 4 OTHER REVIEWS AND PERMITS 0 DFWHPA o Shoreline 0 COE 404 Management 0 DOE Dam Safety IUSt~ Rocker aulV 0 FEMA Floodplain o ESA Section 7 0 COE Wetlands 0 Other Site Improvement Plan (Engr, Plans) Type (circle one): ~ 1 Modified 1 all Site Date (include revision dates): Date of Final: Type (circle one): Standard 1 Complex 1 Preapplication 1 Experimental 1 Blanket Description: (include conditions in TIR Section 2) , Date of A1lProval: 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 1 1/1/05 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 7 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Monitoring Required: Start Date: Yes /(9 Describe: Completion Date: Part 8 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN Community Plan: CITY OF RENTON Special District Overlays: _______________________ _ Drainage Basin: --,---_C_ED_A-cR_R_I_V_E_R ________ _ Stormwater Requirements: Part 9 ONSITE AND ADJACENT SENSITIVE AREAS DRiver/Stream _________ _ o Steep Slope ________ _ o Lake o Erosion Hazard _______ _ o Wetlands __________ _ o Landslide Hazard _______ _ o Closed Depression _______ _ o Coal Mine Hazard _______ _ o Floodplain __________ _ o Seismic Hazard _______ _ o Other __________ _ o Habitat Protection _______ _ 0 ________ _ Part 10 SOILS Soil Type Slopes Erosion Potential QVT 0-5% o High Groundwater Table (within 5 feet) o Sole Source Aquifer o Other o Seeps/Springs o Additional Sheets Attached 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 1/1105 2 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 11 DRAINAGE DESIGN LIMITATIONS REFERENCE LIMITATION / SITE CONSTRAINT D Core 2 Offsite Anal~sis D Sensitive/Critical Areas D SEPA D Other D D Additional Sheets Attached Part 12 TIR SUMMARY SHEET (provide one TIR Summary Sheet Der Threshold Discharae Areal Threshold Discharge Area: (name or descrintio~ Core Requirements (all B apply) Discharne at Natural Location Number of Natural Discharae Locations: 2 Offsite Analysis Level: (!)/ 2 / 3 dated: 09129/2006 Flow Control Level: 1 /l2J/ 3 or Exemption Number lincl. facilitv summarv sheetl Small Site BMPs Conveyance System Spill containment located at Erosion and Sediment Control ESC Site Supervisor: Contact Phone: After Hours Phone: Maintenance and Operation Responsibility: Private / Public If Private, Maintenance Loa Reauired: Yes / No Financial Guarantees and Provided: Yes / No Liabilitv Water Quality Type: C. Basi!J/ Sens, Lake / Enhanced Basicm / Bog (include facility summary sheet) or Exemption No. Landscaoe Manaaement Plan: Yes / No §Decial ReQUirements (as aDDlicablel Area Spec~ic Drainage Type: CDA / SDO / MDP / BP / LMP / Shared Fac.(,Norm-:> Reauirements Name: Floodplain/Floodway Delineation Type: Major / Minor / Exemption ,E) t ~O-year Base Flood Elevation (or range): Datum: Flood Protection Facilities Describe: Source Control Describe land use: ZONED CA (comm.flndustriallanduse) Describe any structural controls: 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 111/05 3 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET ,'\ Oil Control High-use Site: Yes~ Treatment BMP: Maintenance Agreement: Yes / No with whom? Other Drainage Structures Describe: Part 13 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION AFTER CONSTRUCTION [liI Clearing Limits [liI Stabilize Exposed Surfaces D Cover Measures GI Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities '@ Perimeter Protection [iii Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris Ensure D Traffic Area Stabilization Operation of Permanent Facilities ~ Sediment Retention D Flag Limits of SAO and open space [liI Surface Water Control preservation areas D Other ~ Dust Control (lg' Construction Sequence Part 14 STORMWATER FACILITY DESCRIPTIONS (Note: Include Facility Summary and Sketch) Flow Control Type/Description Water Quality TypelDescription @ Detention STORM TECH D Biofiltration CHAMBERS & VAUL D Infiltration l:::J Wetpool VAULT D Regional Facility D Media Filtration D Shared Facility D Oil Control D Small Site BMPs D Spill Control D Other D Small Site BMPs D Other 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 111/05 4 JOB NO. DRAWING NAME I<~- SITE I }<JNs NOT TO SCALE 330 BREMERTON AVENUE SE RENTON, WASHINGTON 1241-043-006 EN-06 DATE : DRAWN 10-07-2008 BML n , o~ 7~ti~~r.::r"II~C~O~N~S~U~L=T~I~N~G~E~N~G~I~N~E~E~R~S==~L~L~C~ir--------------------------------------------~ O~ 20021 120th Avenue NE I ,m, I & I a'd I N Suite 103 "8P W ~ ~~ Bothell, WA 98011-8248 E;' ~ www.esmcivil.com Fro£R,I,L WAY 1"'I8J8-S113 BOTHELL 425 415-~lH CL£ ElUM 509 674_'~ 2 Civil Engineering Land Surveying Land Planning VICINITY MAP FIGURE 1.2 o Public Works Project Monogement U,'lndscape Architecture ~~L-~~~~~ __ ~ __ ~~-=~~~ __ ~-=~~~-=-=-=~-L ____________________________________________ ~ Figure 1.3 D.rairiag~4 Basin n SOURCE: GEO LO GIC MAP OF KIN G COUNTY, WASHINGTON 1~1:tC1~1 ~PO~5 ~H I)Iotffi'et D 01· F,",~ ~'PQO ",~ D 0.1· ""M" I VD<l~ I ' 0 Ol>: .. P()Uen'<Jt1 ",II D '" ·LI ",,(~I~f'Id D OU ... ....,U r-. 0 OotnI ·\lU ,." IU~'":'" ,.,...,..11 1 Opoo -" ........... Orl!t, ...... "o-g .. """" D"·...,.f"'~J 'l D O" .. -O''''' .. "wiII .... CJ o...r.Vu-o-_,'I'l """'~'\l)',,,~: L:l Qr;",-()~~~.~~"lr<t':l DQ.., .. ·"' ..... ~,~;.fI'CI't.i:I _~.O""""!I 'U <lfC.. D o...·v.~·.o<'_ .. o-et-"""'" ~-Pr~-~~ CJ 0" l .,..,D:k d-=-.,. O!!poNts 01 FrOJllloef GI .CI .... ron fPl(lilJ too:: .... O! 0 c.,,; .. ~..,. CI.~ OIod ..• ~-DIJni:" ............. e del':\!'1$ o Ct _ TI \. .. ~~.... D 00T .,.,.._. I'fun'Ol'l Jl _ .. ~ dW>,~' OIdW Cflt cl~1 end Uon glaelat Depotln {p lt/sloe..,_, 0 O\;~ "' .. ~ ... ""~'W1'urr.llllw._,~ D ~I~-'lI:-·."fll'::U ~.(e-tll D O"-··,II....,._ ...... I:~ ....... eop.>.... D '""'-... H ........ ~lt'I.""".,.~!t d Qpt'g F<gO!)"'p ~~ __ d'pO.j~ o QIo .. w!1~.·~~'~MH 0 ~~ -'hY.""~5 01"-'I :(~t ~ ... fted 13eMm'~:~t. D ~' ()~.~ •. __ '-O __ i:"''''''' G'~"'l'I ~-~'y.III: .wa-_JI I ~t ~ ~l.I<h ldeooti:s ! ~ ! ~ ~1: ~~ ,. % ~ :ii " : ~ o Q~ ...... , 0 C>..r::. \'"I'eII .. eu~.:rJlle • .,*-;'INod <lOpe''''' D CIr.'I-~r.·~r .. "" i\n.a...q~",! ~&(»''',. Op.:f/!-Pr4-0~TI\'''' 1nt-Q,.fI+.: g I~I d0I»tC'l o 01 · LaO , -wp",·n 0 ~. '''''''''''''.''''''10 "..)1 u.,~_;".r." G~~ 0 OJ,..,· ., •. " ...... ,,,,,,,!.oct. ~., 0fI0Qt-f't t-O .. ..,..,,'" Il':t<.OII~" o :l~ -, .. '" 'i99i Is 0 c.... ~"~ ~)O"1i 0 Op'"C · p ... ~~ .... oo.~I,""C non1'~C'" oH9"I Ii-~. ~~~ ,'"",J ' ~,& ... " o Q,". B .. <h l!ep,,~ .. ~ bl CJ C,.,,, -Val ~ ~J;;l!eroc>s'li . mc .. _~.1 D Q¢r'1 . Pt ~r .. "" I~ ........ j """lit., .. OorP<l lo!> Ov<>l . F'J.,o,.....p.. "'''''l",c.r oepo!~ o Otf · idol'_ d._,,. 0 c.a· ",~ ~I ~ ~ II . ....... D Cd:. (''11 r:t~ abo" O!;onc: . D ,~. to;l.·~~MO no--.gbcbl ~* CJ Qpo<\I. ;>.....oy ....... ff"+';ll_""""""'Ji G._~ Ot:t*"oc.k o apa-.. -?r.-QIrm=a """~~'U r-oo ~1 _ T'c .ilHl....,~t di.""e ... .....,~. D o..<~ -.~J Fo-...uor D 1l1li . joI ~, e h:f Fa1n1;;"" _ O?!.-O .... "1", _T~-~I_~tli)'F;>!1'1~lOfl DCh:t ·,,~ ...... C .. tl n;lf'~~~1!. CJh-T~\'!3 IC1<t:tW;1 Q--P.--...d~-tt~r.l D "T1··.~ut_rod' c::J Om · ~PI"~'~~('~ ~ • .,. _ -o '·R.",.nF ......... Ic~ _ Q-v"P. __ ""'l\"fr..-.r.f"Itd!#-;N dtO-O I", _i~1 T ........ 'rom.; .... o Qc.·.Or:"1ID"t _T~I'ft.T 'O "IoI .... ..."n'tn""UI"" _ O<t..t • Gbc:1l drl!\. ~'~~t"".I "'. _Tp . ~OroJP _";"r. CJ O:Ir -Gluia tI. ..... ~"""""" T, -~<IO'Y,~~", ...... r .. tn:..tl~ _ Qo .. ·a..........,.".posh .. f'd'I'e _'¥fl: 1\ ·C ... ~":,,. , ....... ~ ... n •• i.: D [L]J ... .rfic~1 1 ~:.rwI.,. ~~.~·,,~,u D ~G ·· r:iI9 mo~"""a...<K D UrY.:"oIot~""O$Q o M~II"~IoU;t U~"1S .x.> S ... lI o Fdz.:." g JO B NO. 124 1-043 -006 DATE 10-07-2008 ,. > -DRAWI NG NAME : EN-03 DRAWN BM L 8·tii~~~!piili~~~~~~7;~~~~~~~~;---~~--Y-------------------------------------------------""1 ;? ~: 1d'3! i _C"":O",N"",S,,U,-:L,"-!-T.:.' "N",G..,.,E=-"N",G",-,:' N,-,-"E"E"-,:,R.,,S,:--:-,L'":'L'":'C,-: ~~ ----~~?~"~OthAvenue NE IS I *I ~I SOILS MAP ~........ Bothelt , WA 9801 1-8246 I ~ I"D)DW. WIo.Y I"'l aJa-e113 ::::; 0 9OTli£LL 42"5 "'5~e ,« FIGURE 1 4 tJ ... www,es m civil.com QI: !I..UW MlGI e74-111O:5 ~_~~::<~o~L~c~';';"~E~n~.~';n~.;._,;_n. ____ "" __ ~LD~nd~;S~"~~~;.n!'~~~ __ "--:LD:nd~~~::on:n~'~n'~~;;~ __ A-_____________________________________ • ____________________ --J ... ..... Public Work. ProJec:t WQn09Clmont l.CIndlloop!! Arehitecture 2. CONDmONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY Review of Eight Core Requirements and Rve Special Requirements The following comments are a review of the Core and Special Requirements per the 2005 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual (KCSWDM): Core Requirement No.1 Discharge at the Natural Location The existing property generally slopes to the northeast with a small section in the southeast comer sloping to the southeast The flow to the northeast collects in the on-site depression. The flow to the southeast eventually ended up in the storm drainage system in Duvall Ave. NE. This is the same drainage system that the proposed drainage system will connect to from the northeast comer. The proposed runoff will flow to the northeast comer and be collected and treated then discharged to the east connecting into the existing storm drainage system in Duvall Ave. NE. See Rgure 4.1 in section 4 for an existing hydrology map. Core Requirement No.2 Offsite Analysis A level 1 downstream analysis was previously submitted on September 29, 2006 by Jaeger Engineering. Please see Appendix A for the downstream analysis previously submitted by Jaeger Engineering, dated September 29, 2006. Core Requirement No, 3 Row Control The Orange Grove Cottages project will follow the criteria for flow control set forth by the 2005 KCSWDM. The proposed site improvements will introduce more than 5,000 square feet of new impervious surface area; therefore an onsite stormwater flow control system is required. The project will provide level 2 (Conservation Row) flow control. Please see section 4 for a narrative of the flow control. Core Requirement No, 4 Conveyance System The conveyance system will be deSigned with sufficient capacity to convey and contain the 25 and 1 OO-year 24 hour storm events without overtopping. A detailed analYSis of the conveyance system will be included with the final engineering submittal. Core Requirement No, 5 Erosion and Sediment Control Proposed erosion and sedimentation control measures will be designed in accordance with criteria set forth in the 2005 KCSWDM. Erosion and Sediment Control plan will be included with the final engineering submittal. Core Requirement No.6 The Maintenance and Operation submittal Maintenance and Operations Manual will be included with the final engineering Core Requirement No. 7 Rnancial Guarantees and Liability The King County Bond Quantities Worksheet and facility worksheet will be included with the final engineering submittal. Core Requirement No.8 Water Quality The developed site will provide basic water quality treatment which will be achieved by using the water quality portion of the combined water quality/detention vault See section 4 for a description of the water quality system. 2-1 Special Requirement No. 1 Other Adopted Area Specific Requirements This project lies within the Lower Cedar River Drainage Basin. No other adopted area specific requirements pertain to this property. Special Requirement No.2 AoodplainlAoodway Delineation There is no 1 ~O-year floodplain that is related to a large body of water, i.e. lake or stream, on the site. This special requirement is not applicable. Special Requirement No.3 Aood Protection Facilities This requirement does not apply since the project is outside any defined floodplains. Special Requirement NO.4 Source Controls Water quality source controls prevent rainfall and runoff from coming into contact with pollutants, thereby reducing the likelihood that pollutants will enter public waterways and violate water quality standards. The water quality portion of the stormwater vault facility will be utilized for water quality treatment of runoff from the paved surface subject to vehicular traffic prior to discharge. Special Requirement No.5 Oil Control The redeveloped site is not expected to fall under the high use site category nor exceed the traffic threshold for a high use area 2·2 3. OFFSITE ANALYSIS Please see Appendix A for the Bremerton Ave. Townhomes (previous project title) previously submitted level 1 downstream analysis by Jaeger Engineering dated September 29, 2006. This offsite analysis is a part of the preliminary TlR originally submitted to the City of Renton for this project 3-1 4. FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALllY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN The stormwater detention and water quality facilities were designed in accordance with the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual. The site will provide conservation flow control and Basic water quality treatment based on the City of Renton standards. Existing Site Hydrology (Part A) The existing basin encompasses approximately 1.86 acres and currently has two vacant houses that will be removed. The site is composed of lawn, tall grass and shrubs, and a few trees. The majority of the large trees are near the existing gravel driveway in the center of the site. The 1.86 acre pre-developed area was modeled as 25% forest and 75% till pasture using KCRTS to determine the respective pre-developed runoff amounts. This split of forest and pasture closely matches historic site conditions. A photograph obtained from iMAP showing the site in 1936 can be seen in Figure 4.1 at the end of this section. Please refer to Figure 4.2 for an existing hydrology map. Land Use Developed Table 4.1 Pre-developed Land Use TOTAL AREA I Forest. (Ae) (Ae) 1.87 0.47 Developed Site Hydrology (Part B) Till Pasture (Ae) 1.40 The developed site is approximately 1.87 acres including a small amount of frontage improvements. Of the 1.87 acres 0.09 acres will be bypassed to the existing conveyance system west of the property along Bremerton Avenue NE. The developed site will contain 24 homes with associated parking. The respective impervious and pervious were determined based on the proposed site plan. Including the bypassed area, the site will have 58% impervious area when developed. See Figure 4.3 for a developed hydrology map. Land Use TOTAL. AREA .. CAe) Developed 1.87 Table 4.2 Developed Land Use Impervious Till Grass . (Ae) CAe) 1.05 0.75 4-1 BYPASS BYPASS Imperv. (Ae) Grass (Ae) 0.04 0.03 Performance Standards (Part Cl Performance Standards utilize the KCRTS Methodology with hourly time steps. The site requires ConseNation flow control. This requires that the developed site discharge match predeveloped discharge rates from 50% of the 2-year peak flow up to the full 50- year peak flow. The conveyance system capacity standards require that the new piped system convey and contain the 25-year peak flows and that the 1 ~O-year runofl does not create a severe flooding or erosion problem. The conveyance analysis will be completed in section 5 of this report during final engineering. Flow Control System (Part Dl The detention portion facility was designed under Section 5.3.3.1 of the 2005 KCSWDM. The facility will consist of Stormtech® chambers and washed rock in combination with a detention vault The facility was designed to provide proper volume to discharge flow under the ConseNation Row Control conditions defined in KCSWDM. The facility was sized according to HSPF methodology using King County Runoff Time Series (KCRTS) software. The KCRTS output is presented in Appendix B of this report The facility will have a primary control structure designed to discharge stormwater per Level 2 flow requirements, the flow control system utilizes a flow-restrictor tee with multiple orifices. The storm detention portion of the facility is 4.5 feet deep with a minimum detention volume of 17,967cf. A 5% safety factor has been added to this volume for a total of 18,865cf of volume to detain the developed flows. Further detail of this facility will be provided with the final engineering submittal. TABLE 4.2 Volume Summary MODEL PROVIDED PROVIDED TOTAL CHAMBER VAULT PROVIDED POND FUNCTION VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME (cu. ttl (cu. ttl (cu. ttl (cu. ttl Water Quality 5,750 -11,000 11,000 Detention 18,865 (w/5% S.F.) 6,550 12,375 18,925 Water Quality System (Part E) The proposed water quality system for the northeast sub-basin will utilize the water quality portion of the combined water quality/detention vault The site is expected to meet the Basic water quality treatment goal of 80% TSS removal. See the water quality applications map in this section. A water quality volume analysis is completed below to ensure enough volume for proper treatment of the developed site. 4-2 Water Quality Calculations The water quality vault for the developed site will use the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual guidance for Basic water quality treatment that is sized to a VdVR ratio of 3, which will treat approximately 95 percent of all runoff. A VdVR = 3 is calculated by dividing the required volume NBJ by the volume of runoff NrJ from the mean annual storm. The sizing of vault is accomplished by determining the acreage of pervious and impervious land. Runoff volumes from pervious and impervious areas were determined by multiplying the acreage of each category by the mean annual storm (0.47 inches). Runoff factors of 0.25 for till grass areas and 0.90 for impervious areas were utilized. The sum of these values is the total runoff volume NR). The required basin volume or the volume of the wetpond is determined by multiplying the VR by 3.0. Volume runoff from impervious = 1.05 Ac (Table 4.1.4) x 0.47 in x 0.90/12 = 0.037 Ac-It Volume runoff from till grass = 0.75 Ac (Table 4.1.4) x 0.47 in. x 0.25/12 = 0.007 Ac -It Total runoff volume VR = 0.044 Ac -It Total basin volume VB = 0.044 x 3 = 0.132 Ac -It = 5.750 cf The water quality portion of the vault will provide a minimum of 5,619 cf. Further detail of this facility will be provided with the final engineering submittal. 4·3 Figure 4.1 1936 Aerial Photo • " ~ '". • ';\7~~"";: ;:.'1;.--~ :Co. , • File: \ \Esm6\engr\ESM-J08S\ 1241\005\005\e)(hibiis\EN-04.dwg Plotted: 10/8/2006 1 :40 PM Plotted By: 8rondon Loucks \ :>.. ----'I ~,~...,), z m w II o £ z m iW· Y'" / ( \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ -'-,- ~''''-.,-'J...... .....r" ' "'---~ T"-----"/-'10_ w: ii n I: ('I' r:~ i (, 1\ , J , 'I ; !. Ii -:;,1!. ~ 'I ~ '\'> "'. . j~!' . i J J ',"- • • I ' • j '" I 'b ~" .. ~ . ,I , I ~~ I ~ ." w . F' " ? " L_ ._._. _, _._ --l[Tl Ox m~ [Tl- i::::J t,,',.' 1;):1 j,J ? , : ~'I ,'] '\ ,i ;Ji I'~ I ' r "- I \_ ~"-I I I" " "'"' • . --l fTl '" __ ! ~ 0 X I ,! - , J Vl ~ " ~:::! Z :;aG) [Tlm S::c 0_ <, [Tl0 0-Z "11 G) C JJ m ~ I\) I 1 ORAWING: EN-04 z ~ :;a G) fTl OC e! (J:iI ~ s::m [Tl0 0-I, I <r I (>~ /'" /: ~'Vl j "-/': ~ -\ ~ c"/ ~ , ~,,--,/-./ ~ 11 11 ;;j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ § ~ ~ I f r m Gl m z 0 i I r i, J: I, I' ./ }i)~t4~i; ; ~I"l ·x 00_ -...J~ J>z 0e! ~ Z il --l~ Ox m Vl [Tl:::! z :;aG) [Tl ,;::tIl OC <r [Tl0 o-z G) i J,l! ~ ~~ '. ~<h,_~''-.,~_~ /0' ..... ---(:(; I! BREMERTON AVENUE N,E, LOCAl STREET ) ··,·:L -:;~j~;(.U'l -j[Tl OX m Vl [Tl:::! z Ale! [Tlm ,;::C 0_ <, [TlO 0-Z G) if i' " 0 N 0 0 ... 0 ()) o (J) 0 » r m .. ...... : a II ~ 0 ~ a CONSULTING ENGINEERS LLC 20?21 120th Avenue NE I "'" I ~ I ~ I SUite 103 '81 W ... EXISTING HYDROLOGY MAP Bothell, WA 98011-8248 www.esmcivil.com Civil Engineering Public Works JOB NO. 1241-0~J-OOti DRAWN: Land Surveying Project Management OArr: 10/01/08 SHEET 1 OF I Fe:OEf!AL WA.Y 1'''18J6-5\1J IIOlHEU. 42!!i 41!!i-614-4 ELlENSBURC 509 574-1905 Land Planning Landscape Architecture LAKE YOUNGS LANE DIV. 1 ::l . " o , .'l I \. ~v"-~s ~ . 0 ~.,~G -' I \ . ~O'~ 1 rS"-I \ ~~?~ _,;;' l ,. 1.0" '\. PROPOSED 15'W X 204'l ~<!S \ BASIN BYPASS ',\" 1 ,~'0S~~ 1 . _. '0 ~ c§ :".","'" ) 6~;gZ W?,:W;'C"" c,'?Y.~ AREA 0.07 AC. 1 _Y? c,~ -----t---.,O---'---=~_..: __ ~_+H'-_.~' ~O'0~ :,.;.'-----. '1 ___ --.--! /~~ -"rft? -/ ~-r---:: ... ----..---",f1J,t::J --~----'\ -z I' ,,~Q"'.J\ S PROPOSED STORIAWATER '" ;.--._, -. -'~', 1\ \ / 1 cP / _ -I ---_,",1:-; --'-" -:;. -.pi:> CONTROL STRUCTURE ~ U~' 1').'}..' < "'1.0<:t'--"" \ . ,t>'l, ---'-, ;," ,/ . ... /,,", g,.'='~ ~:.,. . .' - . (~ "~ '" h,,//./ ./~ / .':;/~ .' ,/~ ~ . 7'; /' ·~.~r·, 0i--.j~ ?9c,o'00 r' .I :..~,/\::::_C, .. _/~ . L ~/\,>--,",>.7,.~/' "/-: «>\,,11.1 " " .~ . /''\\1 ,::1 ~ ... ,. n SCALE: 1" = 40' I N'-., ~-t-"I f r "r') ;-/~~~?:'/\ /,,---, fIr i I> I 1 2 3 t ~ 4 5 6 ,,;~ 7 1-H--'./T./~7'\\~. / '// 1/.1 .1, ,; ) , I. I ,. "<~L/" '.,<~ 1/· ~ 1 40 I. \ • H.'~:' ('-=---'---i ~ I "I--"-----1 •. / L,. 1"'-L( I.:':'., 't:' II --~,~ _L r---f--r-----"'7 I ,"~~ ~" ~ ~~, r-• . / 8 TRACT B ( I I ''''' ft · , I-'~, _____ J PARKING r ."\ I", ~ f :.!~i ·.t DEVELOPED BASIN TRACT A -"-11 TRACT 0 ' ~ ~ / ! .",z .~\ 'j ~j 1.80 AC. PARK/PlAZA 9 I PARKING T • i ) '!W .• "'f' I, ,~ _i '.[:J~. Ii ~.:. ,', 1_'0-__ . ..-_--1 I / _6S~ '-;11' i m~'" ~.~ ; ," ~ I / ~6S ,}i'?!: '.... > 8",1:' , \ I ";-----:' I',' ~~ n \ .~ / ,,' Y C:,)()~ .71, '" «~ " Ii ---1 ___ J I 1 ' ~--tl~' , /1 i",;' Zo:;/ I' I , 10 I . '. ~ .. ~o " j/',,' If-~ ." I I I .~",~G ;;;.¢ ~",. Of"e§ i tHY i ffi i ! 25 I 24 23 ,I 22 21' I iTRACT C. • N.E. 3RD L, AN~ E ii. ..~.".i. '\ I -------1"' PARKING -" '-r---. --" " / I I :2 4 " J I .~, I / --"7 !: ~; "I {-'---., II 11 /.. , !"'1' OJ: y;'_ T ~ i / ./; /~/ /1 ~"'" l' ?'?~, / :1(1.' -----i-l l I \ I \ I r-> ",cr\~ , .. "'"" c§~& \1 Ui I I· , ; l" I· ~ I / ~ . /::2'>/.f,' / /, Of" c§ i ( rt ~ 1/ rnm[ -~ ,." -' ~I .m "~"' '. . _ :""-A. r-«l6-1 I>--f-.: t, .---J·.r--~-"-~--,-, .~~" ~ --~ , ____ ~,%-L_ ,1._ ... ~ //~ I I I ,0'-. '-'. --L 'J' ~7 12 I ".-f "i··...:.'" '\ ' , . i -, . r' 'i ~ ~ I I ",<fJ ,~j-m _ .... -I " ' 1 I I I, :,,\ ' ... ~,"~ ,,----.-." L-«l ....... , ,. ~~/" " Ii '. ,~ '~ . -~~~. ( '" I -. J~I :.' 4""" ~, '~ "~~ j I 20 ~rl 13 '/ . ,.' i I \ 1 ~ ~. ~, ' . ! J /~(~, I" rtt I I 0'" I J / I 18 I~ r-- ", / I -' I 2/"' . ,,y-/ , I ) ~-. ...' .~ ~. -' / r 14 15 ,~ /' r j / I Of" L, .. ~ c.j:J 17 16 '" ~ "" --- I , 20' 0 40' 80' LEGEND BASIN DOUNDARY PR0P05ED WATER MAIN PROPOSED STORW DRAlNA.GE toWN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER Io4AIN CATCH BASIN, lYPE 1 CATCH BASIN, lYPE 2 YARD DRAIN SANrTAAY SEWER tu.NHOLE WATER I/N....VE FIRE I-/",'DRANT EXISTING STORI.I MAIN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAIN EXISTING WATER MAIN EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTIN.~ SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EXISTlN~ FlRE H'fDRANT EXISTING WATER t.lETER STORWWATER FAClUT'I" --,,-- l~' ti) ~ ~ .. .. --=== ~ • '2' / r/////j FIGURE 4_3 (f) 0... W « 0 ~ « >-r- CJ r- 0 0 ...J 0 0 (( W 0 > >-I 0 0 a: w 0 0... 0 W ...J 0 W > Z w « 0 a: 0 ~ ! , ~I~ ~ ~ -~, ;, ill .~~ > ~I* we z (9 z w w ~ Z " N (9. ro o • Z c ~ ~ :;1 ~~~ Wi!'~ ~&l[j -OJ 0 r-~ ~ E ..J.;: « 0 ::> 0 > u UJ~8>_ . Z r""'~ .;;: N QJ.J:: >-00--=.... () o ~c7l~ E Ul Q) ~ ~ ~ o ~ 5. CONVEYANCE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN This section will be complete with the final storm drainage report prepared as part of the engineering plan submittal following preliminary plat approval. 5-1 6. SPECIAL REPORTS AND SlUDIES Additional special reports and studies used in developing the Cedar River Station project include the following: Geotechnical Report A geotechnical report has been prepared by Earth Solution NW, LLC, titled, "Geotechnical Engineering Study" dated July 19, 2006. Please see Appendix E for the report Technicallnfonnation Report A preliminary technical information report has been prepared by Jaeger Engineering, titled "Preliminary Technical Information Report for Bremerton Ave. Townhomes" (the previous title of this project), dated September 29,2006. This report was for the first design of this project and was submitted to the City of Renton. Please see Appendix A for a copy of this report 6-1 7. OTHER PERMITS No other permits were needed at the time of this report 7-1 8. CSWPPP ANALYSIS AND DESIGN This section will be completed with the final storm drainage report prepared as part of the engineering plan submittal following preliminary plat approval. 8-1 9. BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES, AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT This section will be completed with the final storm drainage report prepared as part of the engineering plan submittal following preliminary plat approval. 9-1 10. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL This section will be completed with the final storm drainage report prepared as part of the engineering plan submittal following preliminary plat approval. 10-\ APPENDIX A Preliminary Technical Information Report Prepared by Jaeger Engineering JAEGER ENGINEERING· 9419 s. 2()4PLACE:--KENT, WASHINGTON ~8031 PHONE (253) 850-0934 FAX (253) 850-0155 September 29,2006 . DIOVE -.. . LOPhAE'~ 'CiTy • '" P . .. .. OFRENr~~NING . OCT 112006: ,RECEIVED PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT BREMERTON AVE; TOWNHOMES 26 LOTS PREPARED FOR: Jaymarc Development Marc Rousso P.O. Box 2566 Renton, W A. 98056 (206) 948-8899 . PREPARED BY: . James J. Jaeger, P.E. ATTACHED TOWNHOMES 330 BREMERTON AVE. NE RENTON, WA. .. .. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. OVERVIEW 11. CORE DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS III. OFFSITE DRAINAGE IV. PREDEVELOPED DRAINAGE V. DEVELOPED DRAINAGE \il. DETENTION VAULT DESIGN VII. CONVEYANCE SYSTEM VIII. EROSION CONTROL I. OVERVIEW The proposed Bremerton Ave. Townhome Plat is an application for a 26 lot single family attached residential subdivision situated on 2 existing lots with a total area of 1.80 acres. It is located on the east side of Bremerton Ave. NE, approximately 300' south of NE 4th Sf. This project will require preliminary plat approval, a conditional use permit. a site plan approval and a SEPA determination by the City of Renton. The site is zoned CA and is within the NE 4th Sf. Corridor Business District. The proposed product will be attached town homes with a mixture of 2 and 3 unit buildings. Each unit will have its own lot. The surrounding properties to the north. east and west are also similarly zoned CA. with the property to the south being zoned R,s. The site is currently has 2 existing residences. All of the existing houses and garages/sheds will be removed. Both of the existing houses have driveways connected to Bremerton Ave. NE. A recently constructed plat. Ridgeview Court, is adjacent to the site. across Bremerton Ave. NE to the west. There are no wetlands, steep slopes or any sensitive areas on this site. There is a low depression along the north property line. This depression is approx. 10' deep and extends off-site to the north. with slopes up to the adjacent Bank drive-thru driveway. This depression will be filled. The depression wos primarily formed by the filling of the property to the north (bank) and east (the grading for an approved multi-family development). A grading easement will be obtained from the adjacent property (Bank) to fill their portion. The steepest slope is approx. 25% along the south bank of the depression. northwest of the existing house. There are some similar slopes along the north side af the depression. The soils on the site are a silty sand. with some and silt loam. The site is dominated by residential landscaping with few trees. There are approx. 30 trees that are spread throughout the plat. The existing drainage from the north half of the site sheet flows into the depression. The existing drainage from the south half of the site sheet flows to the southwest corner of the site. The proposed use of the property as a 26 lot attached town home residential subdivision will be consistent with the surrounding developments. All of the surrounding properties except for the parcels to the south, are developed. The proposed lots will range in size from the minimum of 1426 SF to a maximum of 3337 SF (including access and drainage easements). The density of the plat is 20.0 units per acre in the CA zone. Access to the new lots will be from a new intemal public street that runs east/west and is connected to Bremerton Ave. NE. Within the plat, the public road turns to the north and is connected to a public alley that then turns to the west and connects to Bremerton Ave. NE. to complete an internal loop. There will be a short public road stub 10 the southeast with a private road extension to serve the southeastern portion of the development. The new streets are proposed to be 32' wide residential streets with a 42' right-of-way. The reduced ROW will be wide enough to accommodate the street and sidewalks on both sides. The reduced ROW width is needed to keep the net lot area at a maximum to stay under the maximum density. Eight joint driveways will be placed within easements and will be used to access most of the two unit buildings. Bremerton Ave. NE is currently improved on the west side (by Ridgeview Court) but not on the east side. The proposed plat will construct the east side of the street to complete the full road section. A new water main and sewer main will be installed in the new plat street and connect to existing mains in Bremerton Ave. NE. The water main will run through the site and be connected to a future water main in the multi- family project to the east. The water and sewer service is provided by the City of Renton. The site will require substantial grading for the proposed road. The depression will need to be filled for approx. 8' in depth. The building pads for the lots will also require some minor grading but nothing over 4 feet in depth. The main grading activity will be associated with the ~xcavation for the detention vault and the fill for the depression. The estimated amount of grading is 500 CY for cut and 4000 CY for fill. It is anticipated that the site will use some of the cut material on-site, but the majority will be imported. Page 1 012 KIng County BuildIng and Land tievetopment DivIsion' TECHNICAL TION .' (TlR). WORKSHE;.ET .. :~ J.!:"~j" ..... ,,:}-,..', .' ;;,,~. -~:.~,,' ..... ~';";."" ~~-.c:';. .... w-,-:~ .. '" Subdivision Shorl Subdivision o Grading o Commercial . ErOther C' .0, P. I ?t1c.-8.f>M PART2 PROJECTLOCATlON .-. AND DESCRIPnON . Project Nama \?t>eMerTI>-0 &~ JOwl')- Localion Township _. -<2,::!..<~3,.:N;,;=·,--_ S F- nlr'il Range Section ,,- Project Size e . '3J ~ AC ~_-= Upstream Drainage Basin Size 'Q ."6'1 AC o DOF/GHPA o COE404 o 'DOE Dam Safely o FEMA Floodplain o CaE Wetlands Shoreline Management Rockery 's:! Slructural Vaults D Other D HPA P.'" ..... s SITECO .. • .... ...,.ANDDRAlNAGEB"·S···· :'..' .... ,.:.. . -'... -~. : :ftJI1 nunwn~.1 ....... 1 _.' _ ." ~" .. -.-.'.: .... "-~ .'~.~ -.' _.:~, .... :.; •.. ".:...:--.; CommuniI)' . Drainage Basin DRiver 0 o Stream 0 o Critical Stream Reaoh 0 ~ Depressions/Swales 0 o Lake 0 o Steep Slopes . ~ o LakesidelEr~sion Hazard Slopes o -5"..,6'----_ , j Additional Sheels Anaiched Floodplain Wetlands Seeps/Springs High Groundwater Table Groundwater Recharge Olher Of£: -SIte:. ErosiOH Polen,tial _fD""D",,~~~ egrr.JJ\~+ Erosive Velocities 5: EfS--t ---- --------- L-_._. __ .... _ ... ___ . ___ . ____ . ___ .. _ ..... ----_._------------- Pag82 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORM" T10f(REe9flT (T,Ifl) )Y9FiKSHc l=ET ... ~~-.,. . .". .... '\ -, ..... ;.-.... ,., ,-~~:.;"... { -·r;:;'-$-~:"':~"··:::'(,~'·~~:C;:~~ ~ ".:~Ah;'· .. {~::~'i~:'r~-'';~,1ttj·~".!....-""",;~ ?:..-: , PART a DEVELOPMENT UMITAnONS c • • ~~!i:~:;:f~:c.-~ ,'/"'-:1'--~ r" . ;;.. ..• ~::-, .. ~; , o o o o o o o REFERENCE. Additional Sheats Attatched PART 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS . MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION ~ Sedimentation FaCilities ~ Stabilize ExposedSurfaca L;g;-StabiHzed Construction Entrance 1;:2' Remove and Restore Tempora!)' ESC Faali!ies ~ Perimeler Runoff Control C8J' Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris ......... ~ .QI~aring a0CI Grading Aes\!ictions 'c • ~_ Ensure 0pe,ati9" 01 PermanentFacilijies._ '. ,~ cOver Practices . .. .~. J-.l1>.C] RagUmftso{NGPES;'::"'" _ J~::-"GE>"s~~i".n~qu~"-ca"~~.~(~~":'~~=". D~otiler . ..- '.0 Other 'c ." •• ~. c •• _·: •••• :._ ,=-~.'.' 'c ••• _~_: . PART10 SURFACEWATERSYSTEfIl . . . . '. c _ ,._'. o GraSs Uned Channel ~ Pipe Syslem D Tank t::;;:r Vault D Infiltration Method 01 Analysis o Open Channel D Energy Dissapator D Wetiand·· o DryPond. .., j>a. Wet~ \(cW\t" ~, 0-$irea~o' Facifity Relaied Site Limilations Reference Facility UlTlltation ~Caslir;PI:;;caVaUll~C\ d;61he?'~<· c- DReI~~j;;gW~II'-· o Rockel)' > 4' High o St;uc1uraio~SleepSlope lor a civil engineer under my supervision hava visited the sHe. ActusJ site condflion.s as observed' were incorporated into this worksheet and the atialchment9. To the best of my knowiedge the information provided here i.9 accurBt-B. k:c:.p;:;rs -2-COS'" CompensationIMiligation of Eliminated Sile Siorage NA IN\' V~l Ie:-' , ,. \1) lXNalt lhe.- o Additional Sheets At1atched E '. ¢6;ainage Ease,:,~nt D Access Easement o Nati~e GroWth p'rotection Easement D Trael o Other , "" ----'.'-..'. =--=-:;-;-=- ---=-=-lilt t t It NW1S-2:H15 + E. ~1r·.vI "''''!!=''''-... .- -----II, U'''It u,u ~U. NU Ill, "I. WHo) N -4~I1UIW' t~aO/lll co ill - -n 86-02 58 11' ~;'ij:':'':t;..~-~;.;:;::..:;;:;.;:-:..:.:.~.;.:...:,:;.~; ?_ .. __ ", ~ ::;,. .U (S,P.) fl a8-Dl 58 11 s: ii-02-58 11 ~""'-_"::"_-=':':' ::::r.r"[-J'Jj'"Q-~l~rt~"~·-~'·l'-~'::"=-::::C,:'--:-:":--:-::-:-~C-~i~~J~'_~"~J2-~~:'~::_:.:_: __ ::_:.:_:_::..:;! 'BII1lH2' [SI IBB6 -~ RU1QH ORD. J~ :l 195 J -------1' 4ilH40D • ~a.; on I1UUlUI . ~.! Ita.a, ~e 5 C 8U2l) B~B/65 ... UH/4H LOT "B" I~OllD 5F J.22 At 0031 ;:: ~;~~ lJ215 Sf DOO9 "'/"...... I /"", N 85-RZ 8. \ ' ~ '".;+..' lG I. 30 .1,11/ 1&7.10 (P) !~; ~ I" I 0 ~:' peL. A ,.,':, :;::1 : ,I, Z 0: :;' -, ~ ~ KCSP 1079069 i'::5 ~ .::: 0 ~ ;,i . ."1 OJ!J ~ ::I: UJ @. yo; . -,;; jl; ;; B00204Q7)l4 '" I , '" Cl,U ~ '9:-<"~: ~.. .... ·jl r-;:r. ... I ':'OJ ~ .... I lO LOT 2 :::! ,,; g-""l", ~:b Ii; '£ :.:i ~ .\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I 'F. r';'; ~ ~:I ,. ~ ",;;:: rn I, 'J >J. ~'" :' ,~ _ :c ' ~ w :::l 0 <:;.. ~ I~ • • I-' "i a:~Ill"~ !J..$'''; , ,'1' ::; .... I ~ .!.. .N _I .... _ C'J -.:s-""1 ,-" ,,'1."", .... ~~' :~JI j l,of1 At ~ : l' .... ~ HSDl sr . *! 311" I • 9C nD?! SF 71 "t)' .~\"l" , :'l ~ ~ "' ..,~., ~..,:'\. ... " 2; 11 .~"lI\'J :: """.~'\ .....: I " >:-1---- ';:> "~~~' " 0041 lO·' 0010-0020 I;' J"" " -I' 212.&J ab I II ,1-13&-06 I 001J J I 1109+ I s, lN, " " lit,; ii,["jThr,":.~'Hi:ii,-,----_ -fr:' j 1i,.,_~ J: _ 1Il.s~Jleh__ ' I IIXl2 , I ~ .. 1 ~~ ... -'-~;~ ~ \ IIJI 'lin :: 't 1J .. • .. ~ ';iW-~~"li ~ ~-:.:,,;,r:!"! '--E::.~ l' --...., 50' • 15'u11 ~ 4 ~jf!" • -Ii · 1L~5 a ( ~J ~ R lOGE.'I.{lE'N 1:: KCSP 676016 7609060646 I!. ,,,.17 'I .I'~ " .'l.."' .... IJI' , "'": f. :: a~ " .j> ';'~"l'" 1.' ',iii:; ~ - ,I, :')0:,.") J II: LOT 2 :: .:-:>\-<;'l \' "',' i, '" o"ie Ie '-LOT] I ~ii;1 ~ ) ii11i:l ~ ,; m ----ll~ 2.QR '''~ c....ou"q .... f II( _., Jr. NREC. " '" II[IlTOII ORD. IH6 l.a Joe US1S, 0042 ~:II',i <C os.!" ' ,;1,1 :z if ~I ~~"~" ~l "'.I! i11 ~ u:if 1 =,' 1II':li" " t,[(1 .... 0.42 I.e '!! 1.5, AC Ii ,,-~~---....., !""--!:.~..:..:;: Jll,or,,{' ..... _· __ • JU,J'--._-_.-_ -,:;.: .. , ... ,,·: .... ~:;'Jl J5.01 ';'ol:;:;';'1';'~""'4~' I' l2:irl1-·:''''-~~;;J· 4D,O\ ~'h";""i": ~O.Ol ill'l S192 -0035 l: .. -._ .. " .• ~.~JJ:.~r. IH4q ~ t 5~,~, ... ~;;':I'IT::~"· .. ~ ---ii":;.-ri~~r.~~---·-· :-~~~~t.!:...'=-,'\:-l!;P O~ .. \ A~; ~~<N • ..... ~ I I 'rlUI ~~ ...; ~ c: :l;"-=: _,.""l:: 1 t ,~, ~a1 .. "':l ...... ~~ .... ,,~..., ~~.~ II .J 'I '1' '~o::.' '\":1'),"1: -'\ om/ ;;J ~! ;1,'1' '" ~6~ "l~~~ r<;< 1'''' '1,.O~ <'< If'" 0':{\ :;: '\~t>~'" ~..;,e~ t\"'\\~~ '\. ... :<.1"'''': ~\'l'\,~ 'a " '\~~ ... --'\.~rJi .;. .~ ~ ,~ H6UI JJJOI JlJO, llJOl JUDI Jg90' n9Df om mOl mOl mOl 5 i :1 IS 2.50£' 1u3D ~~ ,.,tit J5.01 10 Rill fUl {u.n, 4001 HI" lJ ;1 '6 J~ I : i, ~ om 0090 OOBO 0070 OOBO mM 3&,$3 J5.01 H.U J5.01 " Rill ~, ... '-J'\.'J~~ ',~ ~ .. lOJ, ,a.u ,,+~al.42" "1 IIl.tl 1.00 IlOO< !~t::::i;i!if""Ii«J lel.ll :; ........ ~ ~ ~r 27.',')' .. '\' .... ~ 2 ~ ~ Iller, 121 U II 1 1----10040 oo:JO 0020 -, ' 'I~ "' • • • ~;1 1 : : 5,gg, NE ~~~_ CT ~ _ T !! J ~:o $1--'/1, O?- tlB9-0S-D5l! Hl,Dl --22i:;-, -- 0200 • ..... -.:::~ .~ .. 2 ... '\~ ... t.~1 II. CORE DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS 1. Discharge at Natural Location: The northern portion of the site currently sheet flows to the north and into the on-site depression. The southern half of the site is fairly flat, out would sheet flow to the southeast corner. There is an existing pond on the adjacent property to the south, just south of the southeast comer. The local collection point of all of this drainage, prior fa recent construcTIon, was the existing drainage system in Duvall Ave. NE, east of the site. The proposed drainage system will collect the runoff into a vault located at the southeast property comer and discharge it into a pipe that runs to the northeast comer. At this point, an off-sife pipe will be placed in an easement and connect to the existing drainage system in Duvall Ave. NE. This is the same drainage system into which the existing site runoff eventually discharges. 2. Off-Site Analysis: An upstream and downstream drainage analysis has been performed and is detailed in section III of this report. 3. Runoff Control: This project is providing a 2005 King County level 2 standard flow control. This matches storm duration for the half 2 year through the 50 year storm event. It matches peak flows for the half 2 year event. The flow control will be accomplished using a detention vault with an orifice type flow restrictor. Additionally, the conservation flow control criteria is being applied to this project. This requires that the pre-developed site conditions be modeled as historic site conditions, or 100% forest. 4. Conveyance System: The project will provide conveyance piping for the street drainage and the lot roof downspouts. The piping will be sized to handle the 100 year developed storm event. 5. Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan: An erosion control plan will be prepared and will be included with the engineering plans. This erosion control system will include silt fencing along the west, south and east property lines, a construction entrance, seeding & mulching and clearing limits. A sediment trap will be designed as part of the initial grading and development of the site. 6. Maintenance and Operation: The public road and alley will be dedicated to the City and maintained by the City. The private road, jOint driveways and drainage vault will be maintained by the Homeowners Assodalion, 7. Bonds and Liability: The appropriate bonding and insurance forms will be secured prior to any construclion on the site. SPECIAL DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS There are 12 special drainage requirements that may apply to any project. In this case, none of them apply to this project. III. OFFSITE DRAINAGE A. UPSTREAM DRAINAGE There is only one direction that is higher in elevation that the subject site. This is the property to the north. This property is developed as a' commercial bank. The bank has a paved parking area with perimeter curbing. The drainage from the bank is collected by the pavement/curbing and piped into a detention tank (subsurface, oversized pipe). The Qutlet from this detention tank is at the southeast comer of the bank property. This is adjacent to and flows into the existing on-site depression. The drainage from the bank feeds the on-site depression that does not have an outlet ever since the property to the east was recently filled. The proposed site drainage system will included a separate drainage bypass pipe that will intercept the discharge from the bank and convey it to the project's off-site discharge pipe at the northeast comer. A drainage easement will be granted to the bank. B. DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE The drainage from the site will be discharged from the detention vault/wetvault near the southeast property corner and into a new 12" conveyance pipe that will run approx. 200' to the north property line. At this point. it will connect with the up-stream (bank) drainage bypass pipe. If will then turn to the east and run for 50' along the north property line to the northeast corner of the site. At this point. the drainage will exit the property in a 12" pipe to the east. 1. The oft-site drainage pipe will be located within a drainage easement within the multi-family project located directly east of the site. This will be a 12" pipe that will run approx. 350' due east and cross Duvall Ave. NE. 2. A new type 2 CB will be installed in the east shoulder of Duvall Ave. NE. This CB will be placed obove an existing 12" pipe that flows to the south. 3. This 12" pipe runs to the south in the east shoulder of Duvall Ave. NE tor approx. 50' to another type 2 CB. 4. This type 2 CB has an outlet pipe that runs to the east and into the mini-storage complex. 5. The drainage will flow through the conveyance system within the mini-storage complex. There is a nelwork of pipes and CB's that run under the driveways within the mini-storage project. There is approx. 650' of piping that runs along the west and south side of the mini-storage. The piping system discharges into the drainage ponds within the mini-storage complex, in the southeast comer:· 6. The mini-storage drainage pond discharges into a stream located approx.. 70' east of the mini-storage site. This stream is a tributary to Maplewood Creek. The pond discharge point is approx. 300' south of NE 4th St. This stream is part of a stream/wetland complex located within the parcels that are being considered for development by West Coast Development. 7. The stream flows to the south within the West Coast property and into a diversion pond constructed by King County. This pond was construct to divert a portion of the stream flow away from the original stream. The original stream flow was causing downstream flooding problems in the older Puget Colony Homes Plat. A new 36" pipe was installed by the County within Field Ave. NE/140th Ave. SE. to provide a diversion route for the stream flow. 8. The 36" pipe runs due south within the 140th Ave. SE ROW. At SE 132nd st., this ROW becomes part of an area along the eastern boundary of the Laurelhurst Div. 2 plat that was landscaped and left open as a buffer strip_ The recent landscaping and retaining walls seem to have hidden some of the drainage structures within the 140 th Ave. SE ROW. The 36" CPEP pipe continues south within the 140 th Ave. SE ROW to approx. 100' north of SE 134 th st. At this point the 36" pipe turns to the southeast and runs through a vacant lot and into the cul-de-sac bulb at the west end of SE 134th Sf.. in Puget Colony Homes subdivision. The 36" pipe then turns to the east and runs along the south side of SE 1 34th St. There are 2 type 2 catch basins that were found along this run. The pipe crosses 1 42 nd Ave SE to a type 2 CB in the east shoulder of that road. The 36" pipe then turns south and runs to the south along the east edge of the road pavement. There are 7 type 2 CB's along this run, from SE 134th Sf. to SE 136th st. These 7 CB's were found in the field. There is also a large ditch within the east shoulder of 142nd Ave. SE that flows to the south. This ditch displayed running water during a dry period and has signs of high flows. The 36" pipe discharges into this ditch just south of SE 136 th St. At this point. the ditch frows into a well-defined tributary of Maplewood Creek. Summary With the 2005 King County conservation flow level 2 detention requirement in place for this project, the developed runoff from the site should not have an impact on the downstream drainage system. I underStand that strict conservation flow level 2 requirement is a result of problems within the downstream system. ......... --- 15 T23N R5E E --, , , 3S aA'j 4l-8ET ,--, " --"::::=--"- -.- 'lll 1 anI NE'lJ. 9 IV. PREDEVELOPED DRAINAGE The drainage from the existing site currently sheet flows towards the depression-along the north property line and to the southeast comer. The site has 2 drainage sub-basins. The northern portion flows to the depression and the southem portion flows to the southeast comer. The south em portion of the site is very flat and may provide substantial surface infiltration. The existing site area is characterized by lawn, tall grass and shrubs, with a few trees. The larger trees are located around both sides of the central gravel driveway. The majority of the site is lawn and tall grass. There are no drainage improvements on the site. The existing frontage along Bremerton Ave. NE is improved on the west side only with curb, gutter & sidewalk. The entire site area of 1.80 acres was used as the tributary drainage basin. The existing drainage analysis was performed using the "KCRTS" hydrology software and its summary tables and charts are attached for reference. The methods outlined in the 2005 King County Surface Waler Drainage Manual were used as guidelines. Following this page are the dala sheets used for the computer input data. The computer summary sheets for peak flow and time of concentration calculations are also attached. Below is a brief description of the existing drainage characteristics: 2 year peak flow: 10 year peak flow: 100 year peak flow: total area: pervious area: ground cover: impervious area: ground cover: 0.05 CFS 0.09 CFS 0.15 CFS 1.80 acres 1.80 acres till, forest None impervious "-, BREMERTON AVE. TOWNHOMES PRE-DEVELOPED DRAINAGE KCRTS PEAK FLOW SUMMARY Total Area: 1.80 Acres Impervious surface: None Pervious surface: 1.80 Acres Till, forest Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:pre.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis------- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak -Peaks Rank Return Frob ICFS) ICFS) Period 0.114 2 2/09/01 18:00 0.145 1 100.00 0.990 0.031 7 1/06/02 3:00 0.114 2 25.00 0.960 0.084 4 2/28/03 3:00 0.OB7 3 10.00 0.900 0.003 8 3/24104 20:00 0.084 4 5.00 0.800 0.050 6 1/05/05 8:00 0.073 5 3.00 0.667 0.087 3 1118/06 21:00 0.050 6 2.00 0.500 0.073 5 11/24/06 4:00 0.031 7 1.30 0.231 0.145 1 1/09/08 9:00 0.003 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0.135 50.00 0.980 V. DEVELOPED DRAINAGE The developed project will include the new detention vault & wetvault located near the southeast corner of the site, under the proposed private rood. It will be located within a drainage easement and will be designed to accommodate traffic loadings. The site drainage will be roufed into the vault using catch basins and pipes located within the new roads. Each building will be furnished with a piped drainage stub that will be connected to the street drainage system. The areas used to calculate the flows were the same as those areas used in the predeveloped drainage calculations. The impervious surface was calculated using autocad polylines and the actual area of the buildings, parking, driveways and roads. The detention vault was sized 10 meet the performance criteria established by the King County Level 2 detention slandard. This criteria is that the vault can only release at a rate not to exceed 50% of the 2 year pre-developed peak flow while retaining 50% of the 2 year developed peak flow. This is the same for Ihe 25 year peak flows. Additionally, the stonn event duration for the developed site condilions must match or be less than the pre-developed stann duration, for the 50% of the 2 year flow through the 50 year stann flow. This is the level 2 standard as specified in the 2005 King County Manual. A wetvault will be used to meet the water quality standards. The wetvault will utilize the detention vault area and will provide the required dead storage below the detention live storage. The volume for the dead storage is based on the area of the impervious and pervious surfaces that drain into the vault. Similar to the existing condition, the KCRTS method was used to determine the peak flows for the various storm events. A duration curve comparison was performed to evaluate the vault perfonnance. The computer data sheets for the developed flows follow this page as well as the works sheets and the time of concentration calculations. A brief summary of the developed drainage characteristics are: 2 year peok flow: 0.37 CFS 10 year peak flow: 0.44 CFS 100 year peak flow: 0.73 CFS total area: I.BO acres pervious area: 0.46 acres ground cover: till grass .•... impervious area: 1.34 acres ground cover: impervious BREMERTON AVE. i'OWNHOMES DEVELOPED DRAINAGE KCR'l'S PEAK FLOW SUMMARY Total Area: 1.80 Acres Impervious surface: 1.34 Acres Pervious surface: 0.4(0 Acres Till, grass Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series Fi1e:dev.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--------F1ow Frequency Analysis------- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak -Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.366 6 2/09/01 2:00 0.731 1 100.00 0.990 0.307 8 1/05/02 16: 00 0.498 2 25.00 0.960 0.438 3 2/27/03 7:00 0.438 3 10.00 0.900 0.343 7 8/26/04 2:00 0.410 4 5.00 0.800 0.410 4 10/28/04 16:00 0.390 5 3.00 0.667 0.390 5 1/18/06 16:00 0.366 6 2.00 0.500 0.498 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.343 7 1.30 0.231 0.731 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.307 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0.653 50.00 0.980 Retention/Detention Facility Type of Facility: Detention Vault ~ ,'x-("[) I "3 (.,1:,0 SF Facility Length: 61.00 ft 3 '" Facility Width: 60.00 ft Use. 4z..'~~\ = 3l.>"t& sF Facility Area: 3660. sq. ft Effective storage Depth: 7.00 ft Stage 0 Elevation: 397.50 ft Storage Volume: 25620. cu. ft Riser Head: 7.00 ft Riser Diameter: 12.00 inches Number of orifices: 2 Full Head Pipe Orifice ff Height Diameter Discharge Diameter (ft) (in) (CFS) (in) 1 0.00 0.66 0.031 2 4.90 1. 38 0.075 4.0 Top Notch Weir: None Outflow Rating Curve: None Stage Elevation Storage Discharge Percolation (ft) (ttl (cu. ft) (ac-ft) (cfs) (cfs) 0.00 397.50 O. 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.01 397.51 37. 0.001 0.001 0.00 0.02 397.52 73. 0.002 0.002 0.00 0.03 397.53 HO. 0.003 0.002 0.00 0.04 397.54 146. 0.003 0.002 0.00 0.05 397.55 183. 0.004 0.003 0.00 0.06 397.56 220. 0.005 0.003 0.00 0.17 397.67 622. 0.014 0.005 0.00 0.29 397.79 1061-0.024 0.006 0.00 0.41 397.91 1501. 0.034 0.008 0.00 0.53 398.03 1940. 0.045 0.009 0.00 0.65 39B.15 2379. 0.055 0.010 0.00 0.77 398.27 2818. 0.065 0.010 0.00 0.89 398.39 3257. 0.075 0.011 0.00 1. 00 398.50 3660. 0.084 0.012 0.00 1.12 398.62 4099. 0.094 0.013 0.00 1.24 398.74 4538. 0.104 0.013 0.00 1. 36 398.86 4978. 0.114 0.014 0.00 1. 48 398.98 5417. 0.124 0.014 0.00 1. 60 399.10 5856. 0.134 0.015 0.00 1.72 399.22 6295. 0.145 0.015 0.00 1. 83 399.33 6698. 0.154 0.016 0.00 1. 95 399.45 7137. 0.164 0.017 0.00 2.07 399.57 7576. 0.174 0.017 0.00 2.19 399.69 8015. 0.184 0.017 0.00 2.31 399.81 8455. 0.194 0.018 0.00 2.43 399.93 8894. 0.204 0.018 0.00 2.55 400.05 9333. 0.214 0.019 0.00 2.67 400.17 9772. 0.224 0.019 0.00 2.78 400.28 10175. 0.234 0.020 0.00 2.90 400.40 10614 . 0.244 0.020 0.00 3.02 400.52 11053. 0.254 0.021 0.00 3.14 . 400.64 11492. 0.264 0.021 0.00 3.26 400.76 11932. 0.274 0.021 0.00 3.38 400.88 12371. 0.284 0.022 0.00 3.50 401.00 12810. 0.294 0.022 0.00 3.61 401.11 13213. 0.303 0.022 0.00 3.73 401.23 13652. 0.313 0.023 0.00 3.85 401.35 14091. 0.323 0.023 0.00 3.97 401.47 14530. 0.334 0.024 0.00 4.09 401. 59 14969. 0.344 0.024 0.00 4.21 401. 71 15409. 0.354 0.024 0.00 4.33 401.83 15848. 0.364 0.025 0.00 4.44 401.94 16250. 0.373 0.025 0.00 4.56 402.06 16690. 0.383 0.025 0.00 4.68 402.18 17129. 0.393 0.026 0.00 4.80 402.30 175£8. 0.403 0.026 0.00 4.90 402.40 17934. 0.412 0.026 0.00 4.91 402.41 1797l. 0.413 0.027 0.00 4.93 402.43 18044. 0.414 0.028 0.00 4.94 402.44 18080. 0.415 0.030 0.00 4.96 402.46 18154. 0.417 0.033 0.00 4.97 402.41 18190. 0.418 0.03£ 0.00 4.99 402.49 18263. 0.419 0.040 0.00 5.00 402.50 18300. 0.420 0.043 0.00 5.02 402.52 18373. 0.422 0.044 0.00 5.13 402.63 18776. 0.431 0.052 0.00 5.25 402.75 19215. 0.441 0.058 0.00 5.37 402.87 19654. 0.451 0.063 0.00 5.49 402.99 20093. 0.461 0.067 0.00 5.61 403.11 20533. 0.471 0.071 0.00 5.73 403.23 20972 . 0.481 0.075 0.00 5.85 403.35 21411. 0.492 0.079 0.00 5.96 403.46 21814 . 0.501 0.082 0.00 6.08 403.58 22253. 0.511 0.085 0.00 6.20 403.70 22692. 0.521 0.088 0.00 6.32 403.82 23131. 0.531 0.091 0.00 6.44 403.94 23570. 0.541 0.094 0.00 6.56 404.06 24010. 0.551 0.097 0.00 6.68 404.18 24449. 0.561 0.099 0.00 6.79 404.29 24851-0.571 0.102 0.00 6.91 404.41 25291. 0.581 0.104 0.00 7.00 404.50 25620. 0.588 0.106 0.00 7.10 404.60 25986. 0.597 0.416 0.00 7.20 404.70 26352. 0.605 0.981 0.00 7.30 404.80 26718. 0.613 1. 710 0.00 7.40 404.90 27084. 0.622 2.510 0.00 7.50 405.00 27450. 0.630 2.790 0.00 7.60 405.10 27816. 0.639 3.050 0.00 7.70 405.20 28182. 0.647 3.280 0.00 7.80 405.30 28548. 0.655 3.500 0.00 7.90 405.40 28914. 0.664 3.710 0.00 8.00 405.50 29280. 0.672 3.910 0.00 8.10 405.60 29646. 0.681 4.090 0.00 8.20 405.70 30012. 0.689 4.270 0.00 8.30 405.80 30378. 0.697 4.440 0.00 8.40 405.90 30744 . 0.706 4.610 0.00 8.50 406.00 31110 .. 0.714 4.760 0.00 8.60 406.10 31476. 0.723 4.920 0.00 Hyd 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 8.70 8.80 8.90 Inflow 406.20 406.30 406.40 Outflow Target Calc 0.73 ******* 0.42 0.37 0.11 0.10 0.44 ******* 0.09 0.50 ******* O.OB 0.39 ******* 0.03 0.26 ******* 0.02 0.31 ******* 0.02 0.34 ******* 0.02 31842. 32208. 32574. 0.731 5.070 0.739 5.210 0.748 5.350 0.00 0.00 0.00 Peak Storage Stage 7.10 6.94 6.27 6.02 4.94 4.23 4.15 2.88 Elev 404.60 40L44 403.77 403.52 402.44 401. 73 401. 65 400.38 (Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft) 25987. 0.597 25409. 0.583 22951. 0.527 22018. 0.505 18073. 0.415 15477. 0.355 15180. 0.348 10538. 0.242 Route Time Series through Facility Inflow Time Series File:dev.tsf OUtflow Time Series File:rdout Inflow/Outflow Analysis Peak Inflow Discharge: Peak: Outflow Discharge: Peak Reservoir Stage: Peak Reservoir Elev: Peak Reservoir Storage: 0.730 eFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year B 0.418 CFS at 10:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 7.10 Ft 404.60 Ft 25987. Cu-Ft 0.597 Ac-Ft Flow Duration from Time Series File:rdout.tsf Cutoff CFS 0.002 0.005 0.007 0.010 0.013 0.016 0.019 0.022 0.025 0.028 0.031 0.034 0.037 0.040 0.042 0.045 0.048 0.051 0.054 0.057 0.060 0.063 0.066 0.069 0.072 Count 27584 7052 6360 6602 4559 3610 2246 1861 826 399 14 15 6 6 3 12 17 16 10 11 6 5 9 8 9 Frequency % 44.984 11.500 10.372 10.766 7.435 5.887 3.663 3.035 1. 347 0.651 0.023 0.024 0.010 0.010 0.005 0.020 0.028 0.026 0.016 0.018 0.010 0.008 0.015 0.013 0.015 CDF % 44. 984 56.484 66.856 77.622 85.057 90.944 94.607 97.642 98.989 99.640 99.662 99.687 99.697 99.706 99.711 99.731 99.759 99.785 99.801 99.819 99.829 99.837 99.852 99.865 99.879 Exceedence_Probability % 55.016 43.516 33.144 22.378 14.943 9.056 5.393 2.358 1.011 0.360 0.338 0.313 0.303 0.294 0.289 0.269 0.241 0.215 0.199 0.181 0.171 0.163 0.148 0.135 0.121 0.550E+00 0.435E+00 0.331E+OO O.224E+OO o . 149E+00 0.906E-01 0.539E-Ol 0.236E-Ol O.lOlE-Ol 0.360E-02 0.338E-02 O.313E-02 0.303E-02 O.294E-02 0.289E-02 0.269E-02 0.241E-02 0.215E-02 O.199E-02 0.181E-02 0.171E-02 0.163E-02 0.148E-02 0.135E-02 0.121E-02 0.075 8 0.013 99.892 0.108 0.108E-02 0.078 7 0.011 99.904 0.096 0.962E-03 0.080 8 0.013 99.917 0.OB3 0.832E-03 0.083 13 0.021 99.938 0.062 0.620E-03 0.086 9 0.015 99.953 0.047 0.473E-03 0.089 9 0.015 99.967 0.033 0.326E-03 0.092 4 0.007 99.974 0.026 0.261E-03 0.095 3 0.005 99.979 0.021 0.212E-03 0.098 3 O. 005 99.984 0.016 0.163E-03 0.101 3 0.005 99.989 0.011 o . 114E-03 0.104 5 0.008 99.997 0.003 0.326E-04 Duration Comparison Anaylsis Base File: pre.tsf New File: rdout.tsf Cutoff Units: Discharge in CFS -----Fraction of Time--------------Check of Tolerance------- Cutoff Base New %Change Probability 0.026 0.87E-02 0.66E-02 -24.4 J 0.87E-02 0.033 0.60E-02 0.32E-02 -47.0 I 0.60E-02 0.040 0.47E-02 0.29E-02 -37.9 I 0.47E-02 O. 04 6 0.35E-02 0.26E-02 -25.1 I 0.35E-02 0.053 0.28E-02 0.20E-02 -27.1 I 0.28E-02 0.060 0.2U:-02 0.17E-02 -18.1 I 0.21E-02 0.067 0.14E-02 0.14E-02 -1.1 I 0.14E-02 0.074 0.88E-03 0.l1E-02 24.1 I 0.88E-03 0.081 0.55E-03 0.83E-03 50.0 I 0.SSE-03 0.087 0.31E-03 0.41E-03 31. 6 I 0.31E-03 0.094 0.21E-03 0.23E-03 7.7 I 0.21E-03 0.101 0.15E-03 o .llE-03 -22.2 I 0.15E-03 0.108 0.82E-04 O.OOE+OO -100.0 I 0.82E-04 Maximum positive excursion ~ 0.006 cfs ( 8.3%) occurring at 0.074 cfs on the Base Data:pre.tsf and at 0.080 cfs on the New Data:rdout. tsf Maximum negative excursion = 0.018 cfs (-40.6%) occurring at 0.044 cfs on the Base Data:pre.tsf and at 0.026 cfs on the New Data:rdout.tsf Base New %Change 0.026 0.025 -3.6 0.033 0.026 -20.6 0.040 0.026 -34. a 0.046 0.029 -37.2 0.053 0.044 -16.8 0.060 0.053 -12.5 0.067 0.066 -0.6 0.074 0.080 7.9 0.081 0.085 5.2 0.087 0.089 2.4 0.094 0.096 2.0 0.101 0.099 -2.2 0.108 0.103 -4.5 ........ (f) LL 0 ....... Q) C) L- tU .c 0 UJ 0 " ..-;- a 5&! a a -' '- ' .. _; rdout.dur, <> pre.dur 0 00 ____ _ o a o 0 11111111-4 I II 111111-3 1 11111111_2 1 111111111 1 1 I lllilia 10 16 10 10-10 Probability Exceedence I . -z,_~·\{~::-___ ({j).cr~4~·~ ·!D:-~:s .-~).~ . ., -- - ------tfi: .~~ -. __ . __ .-11 •. ---. _._. ---_. --.-_ .. _------------_._._- 0.47 J~~J.e.:9. \ --~IO <.:>; ~~~ ----- --ap--~34·(4:"§.~)~··$9370~ ck\Je-lOf...dl ~ ,00(" .3U,...~~ ~ 10. 4ro( 43Sb0).:r UJ, 02b ..n: ri?.cr( 9037D -+ O.Zs( zooss) C9.,4l .: 2253.7 12. ,\(ol .... "Il€-?ft>'J'J..ej ~ Gj Vo..u It-1 V'\ .3'~ £) -.. -...;. -- APPENDIXB KCRTS Output KCRTS Output VAULT SIZING PER 2005 KCSWDM ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis------- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.129 2 2/09/01 18:00 0.044 7 1/05/02 16:00 0.112 3 2/28/03 3:00 0.011 8 3/24/04 19:00 0.063 6 1/05/05 8:00 0.105 4 1/18/06 16:00 0.100 5 11/24/06 4:00 0.203 1 1/09/08 6:00 Computed Peaks Develo~ed Land Use Condition 0.00 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000000 0.75 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000000 1. 05 0.00 0.000000 Oev.tsf ST 1.00000 Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:dev.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac -Peaks Rank Return Prob (eFS) Period 0.203 1 100.00 0.990 0.129 2 25.00 0.960 0.112 3 10.00 0.900 0.105 4 5.00 0.800 0.100 5 3.00 0.667 0.063 6 2.00 0.500 0.044 7 1. 30 0.231 0.011 8 1.10 0.091 0.178 50.00 0.980 Till Forest Till Pasture Till Grass Outwash Forest Outwash Pasture Outwash Grass Wetland Impervious ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis------- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak -Peaks Rank Return Prob (eFS) (eFS) Period 0.322 6 2/09/01 2:00 0.655 1 100.00 0.990 0.259 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.400 2 25.00 0.960 0.387 3 2/27/03 7:00 0.387 3 10.00 0.900 0.276 7 8/26/04 2:00 0.341 4 5.00 0.800 0.333 5 10/28/04 16:00 0.333 5 3.00 0.667 0.341 4 1/18/06 16:00 0.322 6 2.00 0.500 0.400 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.276 7 1. 30 0.231 0.655 1 1/09108 6:00 0.259 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0.570 50.00 0.980 Bmass Land Use Condition 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 DevBypass.tsf 8T 1.00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:devbypass.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac Till Forest Till Pasture Till Grass Outwash Forest Outwash Pasture Outwash Grass Wetland Impervious ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis------- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak -Peaks Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CF8) Period 0.012 6 2/09/01 2:00 0.025 1 100.00 0.990 0.010 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.015 2 25.00 0.960 0.015 3 2/27 /03 7:00 0.015 3 10.00 0.900 0.011 7 8/26/04 2:00 0.013 4 5.00 0.800 0.012 5 10/28/04 16:00 0.012 5 3.00 0.667 0.013 4 1/18/06 16:00 0.012 6 2.00 0.500 0.015 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.011 7 1. 30 0.231 0.025 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.010 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0.022 50.00 0.980 Retention/Detention Facility Retention/Detention Facility Type of Facility: Detention Vault Facility Length: Facility Width: Facility Area: Effective Storage Depth: Stage 0 Elevation: Storage Volume: Riser Head: Riser Diameter: Number of orifices: Orifice # Height (ft) 1 0.00 2 2.40 3 4.00 63.19 63.19 3993. 4.50 0.00 17967. 4.50 12.00 3 Diameter (in) 0.83 1. 25 1. 00 Top Notch Weir: None Outflow Rating Curve: None Stage Elevation Storage ft ft sq. ft ft ft cu. ft ft inches Full Head Discharge (CFS) 0.040 0.061 0.019 Pipe Diameter (in) 4.0 4.0 Discharge Percolation (ft) (ft) (cu. ft) (ac-ft) (cfs) (cfs) 0.00 0.00 o. 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.01 0.01 40. 0.001 0.002 0.00 0.02 0.02 80. 0.002 0.002 0.00 0.03 0.03 120. 0.003 0.003 0.00 0.04 0.04 160. 0.004 0.004 0.00 0.05 0.05 200. 0.005 0.004 0.00 0.06 0.06 240. 0.006 0.005 0.00 0.07 0.07 280. 0.006 0.005 0.00 0.17 0.17 679. 0.016 0.008 0.00 0.27 0.27 1078. 0.025 0.010 0.00 0.37 0.37 1477. 0.034 0.011 0.00 0.47 0.47 1877. 0.043 0.013 0.00 0.57 0.57 2276. 0.052 0.014 0.00 0.67 0.67 2675. 0.061 0.015 0.00 0.77 0.77 3074. 0.071 0.016 0.00 0.87 0.87 3474. 0.080 0.017 0.00 0.97 0.97 3873. 0.089 0.018 0.00 1. 07 1. 07 4272. 0.098 0.019 0.00 1.17 1.17 4672. 0.107 0.020 0.00 1.27 1.27 5071. 0.116 0.021 0.00 1. 37 1. 37 5470. 0.126 0.022 0.00 1. 47 1. 47 5869. 0.135 0.023 0.00 1.57 1.57 6269. 0.144 0.023 0.00 1. 67 1. 67 6668. 0.153 0.024 0.00 1.77 1.77 7067. 0.162 0.025 0.00 1. 87 1. 87 7466. 0.171 0.026 0.00 1. 97 1. 97 7866. 0.181 0.026 0.00 2.07 2.07 8265. 0.190 0.027 0.00 2.17 2.17 8664. 0.199 0.028 0.00 2.27 2.27 9064. 0.208 0.028 0.00 2.37 2.37 9463. 0.217 0.029 0.00 2.40 2.40 9583. 0.220 0.029 0.00 2.41 2.41 9623. 0.221 0.029 0.00 2.43 2.43 9702. 0.223 0.030 0.00 2.44 2.44 9742. 0.224 0.032 0.00 2.45 2.45 9782. 0.225 0.034 0.00 2.47 2.47 9862. 0.226 0.037 0.00 2.48 2.48 9902. 0.227 0.041 0.00 2.49 2.49 9942. 0.228 0.042 0.00 2.50 2.50 9982. 0.229 0.043 0.00 2.52 2.52 10062. 0.231 0.044 0.00 2.62 2.62 10461. 0.240 0.050 0.00 2.72 2.72 10860. 0.249 0.055 0.00 2.82 2.82 11260. 0.258 0.059 0.00 2.92 2.92 11659. 0.268 0.062 0.00 3.02 3.02 12058. 0.277 0.066 0.00 3.12 3.12 12457. 0.286 0.069 0.00 3.22 3.22 12857. 0.295 0.072 0.00 3.32 3.32 13256. 0.304 0.075 0.00 3.42 3.42 l3655. 0.3l3 0.077 0.00 3.52 3.52 14054. 0.323 0.080 0.00 3.62 3.62 14454. 0.332 0.082 0.00 3.72 3.72 14853. 0.341 0.085 0.00 3.82 3.82 15252. 0.350 0.087 0.00 3.92 3.92 15652. 0.359 0.089 0.00 4.00 4.00 15971. 0.367 0.091 0.00 4.01 4.01 16011. 0.368 0.091 0.00 4.02 4.02 16051. 0.368 0.092 0.00 4.03 4.03 16091. 0.369 0.093 0.00 4.04 4.04 16131. 0.370 0.095 0.00 4.05 4.05 16171. 0.371 0.097 0.00 4.06 4.06 1621l. 0.372 0.099 0.00 4.07 4.07 16250. 0.373 0.100 0.00 4.08 4.08 16290. 0.374 0.101 0.00 4.09 4.09 16330. 0.375 0.101 0.00 4.19 4.19 16730. 0.384 0.107 0.00 4.29 4.29 17129. 0.393 0.112 0.00 4.39 4.39 17528. 0.402 0.116 0.00 4.49 4.49 17927. 0.412 0.120 0.00 4.50 4.50 17967. 0.412 0.120 0.00 4.60 4.60 18367. 0.422 0.432 0.00 4.70 4.70 18766. 0.431 0.999 0.00 4.80 4.80 19165. 0.440 1. 730 0.00 4.90 4.90 19564. 0.449 2.530 0.00 5.00 5.00 19964. 0.458 2.810 0.00 5.10 5.10 20363. 0.467 3.070 0.00 5.20 5.20 20762. 0.477 3.310 0.00 5.30 5.30 21162. 0.486 3.530 0.00 5.40 5.40 21561. 0.495 3.740 0.00 5.50 5.50 21960. 0.504 3.930 0.00 5.60 5.60 22359. 0.5l3 4.120 0.00 5.70 5.70 22759. 0.522 4.300 0.00 5.80 5.80 23158. 0.532 4.470 0.00 5.90 5.90 23557. 0.541 4.640 0.00 6.00 6.00 23956. 0.550 4.800 0.00 6.10 6.10 24356. 0.559 4.950 0.00 6.20 6.20 6.30 6.30 6.40 6.40 6.50 6.50 24755. 25154. 25554. 25953. 0.568 0.577 0.587 0.596 5.100 5.250 5.390 5.520 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hyd Inflow Outflow Peak Stage Elev 1 0.65 0.43 4.60 4.60 2 0.32 0.12 4.47 4.47 3 0.32 0.09 3.94 3.94 4 0.39 0.08 3.48 3.48 5 0.34 0.08 3.35 3.35 6 0.20 0.05 2.61 2.61 7 0.28 0.02 1. 70 1. 70 8 0.26 0.03 2.28 2.28 Hyd R/D Facility Tributary Reservoir Outflow Inflow Inflow 1 0.43 0.03 ******** 2 0.12 0.01 ******** 3 0.09 0.01 ******** 4 0.08 0.01 ******** 5 0.08 0.01 ******** 6 0.05 0.01 ******** 7 0.02 0.01 ******** 8 0.03 0.01 ******** ---------------------------------- Route Time Series through Facility Inflow Time Series File:dev.tsf Outflow Time Series File:rdout POC Time Series File:dsout Inflow/Outflow Analysis Storage (Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft) 18359. 0.421 17850. 0.410 15736. 0.361 13894. 0.319 13379. 0.307 10411. 0.239 6782. 0.156 9117. 0.209 POC Outflow Target Calc ******* 0.45 0.13 0.12 ******* 0.09 ******* 0.08 ******* 0.08 ******* 0.05 ******* 0.03 ******* 0.03 Peak Inflow Discharge: 0.655 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year Peak Outflow Discharge: 0.426 CFS at 9:00 on Jan 9 in Year Peak Reservoir Stage: 4.60 Ft Peak Reservoir Elev: 4.60 Ft Peak Reservoir Storage: 18359. Cu-Ft 0.421 Ac-Ft Add Time Series:devbypass.tsf Peak Summed Discharge: 0.446 CFS at 9:00 on Jan 9 in Year Point of Compliance File:dsout.tsf Flow Duration from Time Series File:rdout.tsf Cutoff Count Frequency CDF Exceedence Probability CFS % % % 0.002 34511 56.280 56.280 43.720 0.437E+00 0.005 6104 9.954 66.235 33.765 0.338E+00 0.008 4983 8.126 74.361 25.639 0.256E+00 0.012 5097 8.312 82.673 17.327 0.173E+00 0.015 3914 6.383 89.056 10.944 0.109E+00 0.018 2566 4.185 93.240 6.760 0.676E-Ol 0.022 1417 2.311 95.551 4.449 0.445E-Ol 0.025 1118 1. 823 97.374 2.626 0.263E-Ol 0.028 959 1. 564 98.938 1. 062 0.106E-Ol 8 8 8 0.032 206 0.336 99.274 0.726 0.726E-02 0.035 42 0.068 99.343 0.657 0.657E-02 0.038 28 0.046 99.388 0.612 0.612E-02 0.042 26 0.042 99.431 0.569 0.569E-02 0.045 49 0.080 99.511 0.489 0.489E-02 0.048 43 0.070 99.581 0.419 0.419E-02 0.052 29 0.047 99.628 0.372 0.372E-02 0.055 20 0.033 99.661 0.339 0.339E-02 0.058 19 0.031 99.692 0.308 0.308E-02 0.062 17 0.028 99.720 0.280 0.280E-02 0.065 22 0.036 99.755 0.245 0.245E-02 0.068 18 0.029 99.785 0.215 0.215E-02 0.072 28 0.046 99.830 0.170 o .170E-02 0.075 24 0.039 99.870 0.130 o .130E-02 0.078 18 0.029 99.899 0.101 0.101E-02 0.082 12 0.020 99.918 0.082 0.815E-03 0.085 10 0.016 99.935 0.065 0.652E-03 0.088 17 0.028 99.962 0.038 0.375E-03 0.092 8 0.013 99.976 0.024 0.245E-03 0.095 0 0.000 99.976 0.024 0.245E-03 0.098 1 0.002 99.977 0.023 0.228E-03 0.102 1 0.002 99.979 0.021 0.212E-03 0.105 1 0.002 99.980 0.020 0.196E-03 0.108 2 0.003 99.984 0.016 0.163E-03 0.112 3 0.005 99.989 0.011 o .1l4E-03 0.115 2 0.003 99.992 0.008 0.815E-04 0.118 3 0.005 99.997 0.003 0.326E-04 Flow Duration from Time Series File:dsout.tsf Cutoff Count Frequency COF Exceedence Probability CFS % % % 0.002 34364 56.040 56.040 43.960 0.440E+00 0.005 6278 10.238 66.279 33.721 0.337E+00 0.009 4914 8.014 74.292 25.708 0.257E+00 0.012 4964 8.095 82.387 17.613 0.176E+00 0.016 4131 6.737 89.124 10.876 0.109E+00 0.019 2503 4.082 93.206 6.794 0.679E-Ol 0.023 1388 2.264 95.470 4.530 0.453E-Ol 0.026 1207 1. 968 97.438 2.562 0.256E-Ol 0.029 870 1. 419 98.857 1.143 o .1l4E-Ol 0.033 221 0.360 99.217 0.783 0.783E-02 0.036 66 0.108 99.325 0.675 0.675E-02 0.040 38 0.062 99.387 0.613 0.613E-02 0.043 26 0.042 99.429 0.571 0.571E-02 0.047 49 0.080 99.509 0.491 0.491E-02 0.050 46 0.075 99.584 0.416 0.416E-02 0.054 30 0.049 99.633 0.367 0.367E-02 0.057 19 0.031 99.664 0.336 0.336E-02 0.061 19 0.031 99.695 0.305 0.305E-02 0.064 18 0.029 99.724 0.276 0.276E-02 0.068 17 0.028 99.752 0.248 0.248E-02 0.071 23 0.038 99.790 0.210 0.210E-02 0.075 26 0.042 99.832 0.168 0.168E-02 0.078 26 0.042 99.874 0.126 0.126E-02 0.081 15 0.024 99.899 0.101 0.101E-02 0.085 12 0.020 99.918 0.082 0.815E-03 0.088 11 0.018 99.936 0.064 O.636E-03 0.092 15 0.024 99.961 0.039 0.391E-03 0.095 8 0.013 99.974 0.026 0.261E-03 0.099 0 0.000 99.974 0.026 0.261E-03 0.102 2 0.003 99.977 0.023 0.228E-03 0.106 1 0.002 99.979 0.021 0.212E-03 0.109 1 0.002 99.980 0.020 0.196E-03 0.113 2 0.003 99.984 0.016 0.163E-03 0.116 3 0.005 99.989 0.011 0.114E-03 0.120 2 0.003 99.992 0.008 0.815E-04 0.123 2 0.003 99.995 0.005 0.489E-04 Duration Comparison Anaylsis Base File: predev.tsf New File: dsout.tsf Cutoff Units: Discharge in CFS -----Fraction of Tirne--------------Check of Tolerance------- Cutoff Base New %Change Probability 0.031 0.93E-02 0.86E-02 -7.5 I 0.93E-02 0.039 0.63E-02 0.62E-02 -1. 5 I 0.63E-02 0.046 0.50E-02 0.50E-02 0.0 I 0.SOE-02 0.054 0.38E-02 0.37E-02 -2.6 I 0.38E-02 0.061 0.28E-02 0.30E-02 8.1 I 0.28E-02 0.069 0.22E-02 0.23E-02 7.S I 0.22E-02 0.076 0.lSE-02 0.lSE-02 -6.3 I 0.lSE-02 0.084 0.10E-02 0.86E-03 -lS.9 I 0.10E-02 0.091 0.7SE-03 0.46E-03 -39.1 I 0.7SE-03 0.099 0.42E-03 0.26E-03 -38.S I 0.42E-03 0.106 0.21E-03 0.21E-03 0.0 I 0.21E-03 0.113 0.lSE-03 0.lSE-03 0.0 I 0.lSE-03 0.121 0.98E-04 0.6SE-04 -33.3 I 0.98E-04 0.128 O.16E-04 O.OOE+OO -100.0 I 0.16E-04 Maximum positive excursion = 0.003 cfs ( 4.4%) occurring at 0.061 cfs on the Base Data:predev.tsf and at 0.064 cfs on the New Data:dsout.tsf Maximum negative excursion = 0.011 cfs (-10.6%) occurring at 0.10S cfs on the Base Data:predev.tsf and at 0.094 cfs on the New Data:dsout.tsf Route Time Series through Facility Inflow Time Series File:dev.tsf Outflow Time Series File:rdout POC Time Series File:dsout Inflow/Outflow Analysis Peak Inflow Discharge: 0.655 CFS at 6:00 on Peak Outflow Discharge: 0.426 CFS at 9:00 on Peak Reservoir Stage: 4.60 Ft Peak Reservoir Elev: 4.60 Ft Peak Reservoir Storage: 183S9. Cu-Ft 0.421 Ac-Ft Add Time Series:devbypass.tsf Base New %Change 0.031 0.031 -2.4 0.039 0.038 -1. 8 0.046 0.046 0.0 0.OS4 0.OS3 -2.0 0.061 0.064 4.4 0.069 0.071 3.1 0.076 0.075 -0.9 0.084 0.081 -2.7 0.091 0.087 -s.o 0.099 0.091 -7.3 0.106 0.106 0.4 0.113 O.llS 1.2 0.121 0.118 -2.1 0.128 0.124 -3.5 Jan 9 in Year 8 Jan 9 in Year 8 Peak Summed Discharge: 0.446 CFS at 9:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Point of Compliance File:dsout.tsf Flow Duration from Time Series File: rdout. tsf Cutoff Count Frequency CDF Exceedence Probability CFS % % % 0.002 34511 56.280 56.280 43.720 0.437E+00 0.005 6104 9.954 66.235 33.765 0.338E+00 0.008 4983 8.126 74.361 25.639 0.256E+00 0.012 5097 8.312 82.673 17.327 0.17 3E+00 0.015 3914 6.383 89.056 10.944 0.109E+00 0.018 2566 4.185 93.240 6.760 0.676E-01 0.022 1417 2.311 95.551 4.449 0.445E-01 0.025 1118 1. 823 97.374 2.626 0.263E-01 0.028 959 1. 564 98.938 1. 062 0.106E-01 0.032 206 0.336 99.274 0.726 0.726E-02 0.035 42 0.068 99.343 0.657 0.657E-02 0.038 28 0.046 99.388 0.612 0.612E-02 0.042 26 0.042 99.431 0.569 D.569E-02 0.045 49 0.080 99.511 0.489 0.489E-02 0.048 43 0.070 99.581 0.419 0.419E-02 0.052 29 0.047 99.628 0.372 0.372E-02 0.055 20 0.033 99.661 0.339 0.339E-02 0.058 19 0.031 99.692 0.308 0.308E-02 0.062 17 0.028 99.720 0.280 0.280E-02 0.065 22 0.036 99.755 0.245 0.245E-02 0.068 18 0.029 99.785 0.215 0.215E-02 0.072 28 0.046 99.830 0.170 0.170E-02 0.075 24 0.039 99.870 0.130 o .130E-02 0.078 18 0.029 99.899 0.101 0.101E-02 0.082 12 0.020 99.918 0.082 0.815E-03 0.085 10 0.016 99.935 0.065 0.652E-03 0.088 17 0.028 99.962 0.038 0.375E-03 0.092 8 0.013 99.976 0.024 0.245E-03 0.095 0 0.000 99.976 0.024 0.245E-03 0.098 1 0.002 99.977 0.023 0.228E-03 0.102 1 0.002 99.979 0.021 0.212E-03 0.105 1 0.002 99.980 0.020 o .196E-03 0.108 2 0.003 99.984 0.016 0.163E-03 0.112 3 0.005 99.989 0.011 0.114E-03 0.115 2 0.003 99.992 0.008 0.815E-04 0.118 3 0.005 99.997 0.003 0.326E-04 Flow Duration from Time Series Fi1e:dsout.tsf Cutoff Count Frequency CDF Exceedence Probability CFS % % % 0.002 34364 56.040 56.040 43.960 0.440E+00 0.005 6278 10.238 66.279 33.721 0.337E+00 0.009 4914 8.014 74.292 25.708 0.257E+00 0.012 4964 8.095 82.387 17.613 0.176E+00 0.016 4131 6.737 89.124 10.876 0.109E+00 0.019 2503 4.082 93.206 6.794 0.679E-01 0.023 1388 2.264 95.470 4.530 0.453E-Ol 0.026 1207 1. 968 97.438 2.562 0.256E-01 0.029 870 1. 419 98.857 1.143 0.114E-01 0.033 221 0.360 99.217 0.783 0.783E-02 0.036 66 0.108 99.325 0.675 0.675E-02 0.040 38 0.062 99.387 0.613 0.613E-02 0.043 26 0.042 99.429 0.571 0.571E-02 0.047 49 0.080 99.509 0.491 0.491E-02 0.050 46 0.075 99.584 0.416 0.416E-02 0.054 30 0.049 99.633 0.367 0.367E-02 0.057 19 0.031 99.664 0.336 0.336E-02 0.061 19 0.031 99.695 0.305 0.305E-02 0.064 18 0.029 99.724 0.276 0.276E-02 0.068 17 0.028 99.752 0.248 0.248E-02 0.071 23 0.038 99.790 0.210 0.210E-02 0.075 26 0.042 99.832 0.168 0.168E-02 0.078 26 0.042 99.874 0.126 0.126E-02 0.081 15 0.024 99.899 0.101 0.101E-02 0.085 12 0.020 99.9l8 0.082 0.81SE-03 0.088 11 0.018 99.936 0.064 0.636E-03 0.092 15 0.024 99.961 0.039 0.391E-03 0.095 8 0.013 99.974 0.026 0.261E-03 0.099 0 0.000 99.974 0.026 0.261E-03 0.102 2 0.003 99.977 0.023 0.228E-03 0.106 1 0.002 99.979 0.021 0.212E-03 0.109 1 0.002 99.980 0.020 0.196E-03 0.113 2 0.003 99.984 0.016 0.163E-03 0.116 3 0.005 99.989 0.011 o . 114E-03 0.120 2 0.003 99.992 0.008 O.815E-04 0.123 2 0.003 99.995 0.005 0.489E-04 ~ ci N :-----~--... ci "----"'~ "' ,~ ci \~~ 000 "', ~.~ ~ ~~ "" ~~ ci "-~, "'.,«.~ m " ci \~~ "" ci \4 00 "--..~ N ~ ci -.~ 0 . 0 .Q , , , , 10 ~ 10 ~ 10 ~ Prcbabiflty Ex::ee::Iei ce rdoutdur dsrldill o • Targetdur ..... , , 10' APPENDIXC Geotechnical Report 2881 -152ND AVENUE N.E., REDMOND, WASHINGTON 425.284.3300 FAX 425.284.2855 Tau FREE 866.336.8710 PREPARED FOR SEATTLE REDEVELOPMENT, LLC July 19, 2006 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY 330 -BREMERTON AVENUE NORTHEAST RENTON, WASHINGTON ES-0521 Earth Solutions NW, LLC 2881 -152nd Avenue Northeast, Redmond, Washington 98052 Ph: 425-284-3300 Fax: 425-284-2855 Toll Free: 866-336-8710 ~-:-_ IIl1Portant Informalion About Your, Geotechnical Engineering Report Geotechnical Services Are Performed for Specilic Purposes, Persons, and Projects Geotechnical engineers structure lI1eir services 10 meet lI1e specific needs 01 their clients A geotechnical engineering sludy conducled for a civil engi- neer may nol fulfill the needs of a construction contractor or even another civil engineer, Because each geotechnical engineering study is unique, each geotechnical engineering report is unique, prepared solely tor the client No one fl1(cept you should rely on your geotechnical engineering report withoul lirst conferring with lI1e geotechnical engineer who prepared it And no one -not even you -should apply II1e report for any purpose or project eXCflpt lI1e one originally contemplaled Read the Full Report Serious problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical engineering report did not read it all Do not rely on an executive summary Do not read selecled elements only A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Based on A Unique Set of Project-Specific Factors Geotechnical engineers consider a number of unique, project-specific fac- tors when establishing the scope of a study Typicalfaclors include: the client's goals, objectives, and risk managemenl preferenCfls: the general nature of the slructure involved, its size, and configuration: Ihe location of lI1e slructure on the site: and other planned or existing site improvements, such as acCflSS roads, parking lots, and underground utilities Unless the geotechnical engineer who conducted the study specifically indicates 0111- erwise, do not rely on a geotechnical engineering report that was: • not prepared for you, • not prepared for your project, • nol prepared lor the specific site explored, or • compleled belore important projecl changes were made Typical changes that can erode the reliability 01 an existing geotechnical engineering report include those that affecl: • the function 01 the proposed slruclure, as when ii's changed from a parking garage to an office building, or from a light industrial ptant to a refrigerated warehouse, • etevation. configuration, location, orientation, or weight 01 the proposed structure, • composition of lI1e design team, or • project ownership As a general rule, always inlorm your geotechnical engineer of project changes---;;ven minor onBS----llnd request an assessment of their impact Geotechnical engin= cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems that occur because their reports do not consider devetopmfillis of which /hey were not informed SUbsurface Conditions Can Change A geotechnical engineering report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was pertormed. Do not rely on a geotechnical engineer- ing repor/whose adequacy may have been affected by: the passage of time: by man-made events, such as construction on or adjacent to the site; or by natural events, sur:h as floods, earthqualms, or groundwater fluctua- tions Always contact the geotechnical engineer before applying the report to determine if it is still reliable A minor amount of additional testing or analysis could prevent major problems Most Geotechnical Andings Are Prolessional Opinions Site exploration identifies subsurtace conditions onty at those points where subsurtace tesis are conducted or samples are taken. Geotechnical engi- neers review fietd and laboratory data and then apply their prolessional judgment to render an opinion about subsurtace conditions throughout the sile Actuat subsurtace conditions may difler-1;ometimes significanlly- from those indicaled in your report Retaining the geotechnical engineer who,developed your report to provide construction observation is the .most effective mell10d 01 managing the risks associated with unanticipated conditions A Report's Recommendations Are Not Anal Do not overrely on the construction recommendations included in your report. Those recommendations are not fina( because geotechnical engi- neers devetop lI1em principally from judgment and opinion. Geotechnical engineers can finalize their recommendations only by obseNing actual subsurlace conditions revealed during construction The geotechnical engineer who developed your report cannot assume responsibility or liability for the repor/'s recommendations il that engineer does nat per/arm construction observation A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Subject to Misinterpretation Other design team members' misinterpretation 01 geolechnicai engineering reports has resulled in cosily problems Lower that risk by having your geo- technical engineer conler with appropriate members of the design team after submitting the report Also retain your geDtechnical engineer to review perti- nent elements of Ihe design team's plans and specifications Contractors can also misinterpret a geotechnical engineering report Reduce that risk by having your geotecimicaf engineer participate in prebid and preconslruction oonlerences, and by providing construction observation Do Not Redraw the Engineer's Logs Geotechnical engineers prepare finat boring and testing logs based upon their interpretation of field logs and laboratory data To prevent errors Dr omissions, the logs included in a geotechnical engineering report should never be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings Only photographic or electronic reproduclion is acceplable, but recognize that separating logs from Ihe repoll can etevate risk Give Contractors a Complete Report and Guidance Some owners and design prolessiDnals mistakenly believe Ihey can make contractors liable for unanticipated subsurlace oonditions by limiting what they provide for bid preparation. TD help prevenl cosily problems, give con- tractors the complete geotechnical engineering report, but pre lace it with a clearly written letler of transmittal. In that letler, advise contractors that the report was not prepared lor purposes 01 bid development and that the report's accuracy is limited; encourage them to confer with the geotechnical engineer who prepared the report (a modest fee may be required) and/or to conduct additional sludy to obtain the speciflc Iypes 01 information they need or prefer A prebid conference can also be valuable Be sure contrac- lars have sufficient time to pertorm additional study. Onfy then might you be in a position to give contractors the best infonmation available to you, while requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions Read Responsibiflty Provisions Closely Some clients, design professionals, and contractors do not recognize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact lhan other engineering disci- ptines This lack of understanding has created unrealistic expecfalions that have led to disappointments, claims, and disputes To help reduce the risk of such outcomes, geotechnical engineers commonly include a variety of explanatory provisions in their reports Sometimes labeled 'limilations' many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers' responsi- bilities begin and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilities and risks Read these provisions closety Psk queslions Your geotechnical engineer should respond fully and Irankly Geoenvironmental Concerns Are Not Covered The equipment. techniques, and personnel used to perlorm a geoenviran- menta/study differ signilicantly lrom those used to perlarm a geotechnical study. For lhat reason, a geotechnical engineering report does not usually relate any geoenvironmenlal findings, conclUSions, or recommendations; e g, about the likelihood 01 encountering underground storage tanks or regulated conlaminanls Unanticipated environmental problems have led to numerous project lailures II you have not yet obtained your own geoen- vironmental infonmation, ask your geolechnical consultant for risk man- agement guidance Do na/ rety an an environmentat report prepared for someone else. Obtain Professional Assistance To Deal with Mold Diverse strategies can be applied during building deSign, construction, operation, and maintenance to prevent significant amounts of mold lrom . growing on indoor sunaces To be effective, all such strategies should be devised for the express'purpose 01 mold prevention, integrated into a com- prehensive plan, and executed with diligent oversight by a prolessional mold prevention consullant. Because just a small amount of water or moisture can lead to Ihe development of severe mold infestations, a num- ber of mold prevention strategies focus on keeping building surlaces dry While groundwater, l'r.!ter infiltration, and similar issues may have been addressed as part 01 the geotechnical engineering study whose findings are conveyed irrthis report, the geolechnical engineer in charge 01 this project is not a mold prevention consultant; none of the services per- formed in connection with the geotechnical engineer's stody were designed or conducted for the purpose of mold preven- tion. Proper implementation of the recommendations conveyed in this reporl will not of itself be sulficientto prevent mold from growing in or on the structure involved. Rell'. on Your ASFE-Member Geotechncial Engmeer for Additional Assistance Membership in ASFE/fhe Best People on Earth exposes geolechnical engineers to a wide array of risk management techniques Ihat can be 01 genuine benefit for everyone involved with a construction project Confer with you ASFE-member geotechnical engineer for more information A5FE HI lasl 'ullli In hUb 8811 Colesville Road/Suile Gl06, Silver Spring, MD 20910 TelephDne: 301/565-2733 Facsimile: 3011589-2017 e-mail: inlo®asle org wwwasle org Copyright 2004 by ASFf, 1m; Duplication. roproduc:lion, or copying of this document, In whole or In part, by allY means whafsoever, is srricIly prohibited, axcept with ASFFs specific written fJermissJolt fJlcerpting, qualing. or otherwise extlilcling wording from this document Is permitted Dnry wlrh the express written permission of ASFE, and only for purposes of schalarly researr;h Of beak Telieu~ Only members [If ASFE 111iIY use this dDcument as a CQmplement to Of as Jll element of a Qeateclrnir;aJ enginesring report. Any other firm. indivIrJual, or olher entity Illat so uses thfs documffflt without beiltQ an A5FE memtJu r;auld be cDmmJrtltrQ nugJigcnr rJ{ IntentloniII (fraudulenl) misrepresentation IIGEROii()45 OM July 19, 2006 ES-0521 Seattle Redevelopment, LLC P.O. Box 2566 Renton, Washington 98056 Attention: Mr. Marc Rousso Dear Mr. Rousso: Earth Solutions NW LLC • Geo!echnic;1! Engineerinf; • Construction M(]nilurin~ • Envinmmcml,)l Scicnu-,~ Earth Solutions NW, LLC (ESNW) is pleased to present this report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, 330 -Bremerton Avenue Southeast, Renton, Washington". Based on results of our fieldwork, the site is underlain primarily by native soils consisting of loose to very dense silty sand with gravel glacial till deposits with the exception of the northern portion of the site, where about three to four feet of loose fill is underlain by native sand and gravel deposits. Groundwater was encountered in the northern portion of the site, at depths of between seven and one-half and eight feet below existing grade. As such, localized zones of groundwater seepage could be encountered during site grading operations, depending of the time of year and depth of excavations. In our opinion, the proposed residential structures can be supported on competent or recompacted native soils or structural fill used to modify existing site grades, as appropriate. We anticipate competent native soil capable of providing adequate foundation support will be encountered at depths of between two to four feet below existing grades. Where loose or unsuitable soil conditions are exposed at foundation subgrade elevations, compaction of the soils to the specifications of structural fill, or overexcavation and replacement with structural fill, may be necessary. ESNW should have an opportunity to review the final site designs to provide supplemental geotechnical recommendations, as necessary. The opportunity to be of service to you is appreciated. If you have any questions regarding the content of this geotechnical engineering study, please call. Sincerely, ~ .LLC \~{,d Pc Cog'''. p{ Principal 2881152nd Avenue NE • Redmond, WA 93052 • (425) 284-3300· FAX (-1.25)284-2855 • Toll Free (BUlj 336-8710 TABLE OF CONTENTS ES-0521 PAGE INTRODUCTION "',', .. , ............ "' .. " ........... , .................... ,.. ......... 1 General ,' ....... , ... "., ... ,' .... ', ........... ,.,'." ... , ............... , ......... 1 Project Description ........... , ............ , .......................... " ... ' 2 Surface .............. , .... " ......................................... , .............. 2 Subsurface ........................................... , ..... ,,, ... ,, ................ 3 Geologic Setting ................................... , .................... 3 Groundwater.. ................. , ................ , ...... ' , ....................... , .. 4 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................... 4 General. ............................. , .................. , ........... ,......... ...... 4 Site Preparation and Earthwork ............................................ 5 In-situ Soils .............................................................. 5 Structural Fill Placement. .......................................... 5 Excavations and Slopes ..................................................... 6 Rockeries and Modular Block Walls........................... .......... 6 Utility Trench BackfilL .............................................. , ........ 7 Pavement Sections ................. , ... ' ...... , .... , ............................ 7 Foundations .................... ' ................................................. 8 Slab-on-Grade Floors ............................................... ,.......... 8 Retaining Walls .................................................. ,............... 9 Drainage ................................................................ "......... 9 Seismic Considerations ................................................... ,...... 10 LIMITATIONS ................... ' ............................. , ......... , ... ............... 10 Additional Services... ......................................................... 10 GRAPHICS PLATE 1 PLATE 2 PLATE 3 PLATE 4 APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B TABLE OF CONTENTS Cont'd ES-0521 VICINITY MAP TEST PIT LOCATION PLAN RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL Field Exploration Field Logs Laboratory Test Data Sieve Analyses General GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY 330 -BREMERTON AVENUE NORTHEAST RENTON, WASHINGTON ES-0521 INTRODUCTION This geotechnical engineering study was prepared for the proposed town home development to be constructed at 330 -Bremerton Avenue Northeast in Renton, Washington. The purpose of this study W;:lS to excavate a series of test pits throughout the site to characterize soil and groundwater conditions, perform appropriate geotechnical analyses and develop geotechnical recommendations for the proposed development. Our scope of services for completing this geotechnical engineering study included the following: • Excavating a series of test pits throughout the subject property using a rubber tired backhoe for purposes of characterizing the soil and groundwater conditions; • Providing geotechnical recommendations for earthwork, structural fill requirements, pavements, and drainage facilities; • Assessing the suitability of site soils for use as structural fill; • Providing recommendations for soil bearing capacity, subgrade preparation, and recommendations for foundation support, and; • Providing additional geotechnical recommendations, as appropriate. The following documents were reviewed as part of preparing this Geotechnical Engineering Study: • Autocad site map e-mailed by the Jaeger Engineering, undated; • Composite geologic map of the King Area, Booth, 0.8., 2006, and; • King County Soil Survey (SCS). Earth Solutions mv, LlC Seattle Redevelopment, LLC. July 19, 2006 Project Description ES-0521 Page 2 We understand the site will be redeveloped with a series of townhomes and associated improvements. Due to the shallow topographic relief throughout the site, we anticipate minimal grading consisting of cuts and fills of less than approximately eight feet will be required to achieve design elevations. Based on our understanding of the proposed project, the majority of the fills will occur in the northem portion of the site, in a topographic low area, where grades may be raised by up to eight feet. The proposed residential structures will likely consist of relatively lightly loaded wood framing supported on conventional foundations. We anticipate the majority of the residential structures will incorporate crawl space and slab-on-grade garage floors. Based on our experience with similar developments, we anticipate wall loads on the order of two to four kips per lineal foot and slab-on-grade loading of 150 pounds per square foot (psf). If the above design assumptions are incorrect or change, ESNW should be contacted to review the recommendations in this report. ESNW should review the final design to verify that our geotechnical recommendations have been incorporated into the plans. Surface The site is located along the east side of Bremerton Avenue Northeast south of Northeast 4th Street in Renton, Washington. The approximate location of the subject property is illustrated on the Vicinity Map (Plate 1). The site consists of an irregularly shaped property with a gross area of approximate 1.9 acres that includes two separate tax parcels. The approximate limits of the property are illustrated on the Test Pit Location Plan (Plate 2). The property is developed with residential buildings and associated structures, which will be removed as part of the planned development and is surrounded by residential properties. The overall site topography is relatively level, except for the northem portion, where gradients gently descend approximately eight feet to a topographic low creating a basin feature. Vegetation throughout the site consists primarily of relatively mature landscaping surrounding the existing residential structures. Earth Solutions NW, LlC Seattle Redevelopment July 19, 2006 Subsurface ES-0521 Page 3 A total of five test pits were excavated throughout the subject site for purposes of assessing soil conditions, and for characterizing and classifying the site soils. Our test pit locations were largely controlled by the presence of existing structures, underground utilities and relatively extensive site development. However, our subsurface explorations revealed relatively consistent soil and groundwater conditions across much of the site. Please refer to the test pit logs provided in Appendix A for a more detailed description of the subsurface conditions. Topsoil was encountered at all of the test sites and was on the order of four to twelve inches thick. However, based on the variable topography throughout the site, deeper areas of topsoil may be encountered during mass grading activities. The topsoil can be considered for use in landscape or non-structural areas, if desired. Extensive areas of fill were not encountered during the fieldwork. However, test pits TP-4 and TP-5 encountered three to four feet of loose silty sand with gravel (Unified Soil Classification SM) fill containing trace to moderate amounts of debris and organics. Underlying the topsoil and fill, native soils were encountered consisting primarily of silty sand and silty sand with gravel soils (SM) in the topographically higher areas, and sand and gravel (SP, SP-SM, GP-GM) in the northern, topographically lower areas. Geologic Setting Our review of the referenced geologic map identifies glacially consolidated till deposits (Qvt) throughout the site and surrounding area. Till soils consist primarily of a non-sorted mixture of compact silt, sand and gravel and are in a consolidated condition at depth. The King County Soil Survey (SCS) indicates the presence of Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, six to fifteen percent slopes (AgC) glacial till deposits throughout the majority of the site. The SCS describes these soils as having slow to moderate runoff with a moderate erosion hazard. The soil conditions encountered during our fieldwork generally correlate with the geologic map designations and the SCS classification, with the exception of the northern portion of the property. This area forms a basin which consists of up to approximately nine feet or more of recessional outwash type sand and gravel deposits. Earth Solutions NW, LLe Seattle Redevelopment July 19, 2006 Groundwater ES-0521 Page 4 Groundwater was encountered at depths of about seven and one-half to eight feet below existing grade in test sites TP-4 and TP-5, at the time of the fieldwork (July 2006). Based on our understanding of the proposed site grading, this area will likely be raised by up to approximately eight feet. However, the presence of groundwater seepage should be anticipated in the deeper site exce:vations within this area, particularly for utility trench alignments. Groundwater seepage rates and elevations fluctuate depending on many factors, including precipitation duration and intensity, the time of year, and soil conditions. In general, groundwater flow rates are higher during the wetter, winter months. The soil deposits in the northern portion of the site are consistent with recessional outwash soils, which typically are underlain by glacial till deposits. Therefore, the groundwater observed during our fieldwork is likely confined to the northem portion of the site, and we anticipate any groundwater that may be encountered within the glacial till deposits will be perched and relatively light to moderate. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on the results of our study, construction of the proposed town home development at the subject site is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. The primary geotechnical considerations associated with the proposed development include site grading and earthwork, foundation support, structural fill placement, appropriate erosion control and the suitability of the on-site soils for use as structural fill. Based on the results of our study, the proposed residential structures can be supported on conventional spread and continuous foundations bearing on competent native soils or structural fill, as appropriate. We anticipate competent soil capable of providing adequate foundation support will be encountered at depths of approximately two to four feet below existing grades in areas where cuts will likely occur. Where loose or unsuitable soil conditions are exposed at foundation subgrade elevations, compaction of the soils to the specifications of structural fill, or overexcavation and replacement with stnJctural fill may be necessary. In our opinion, the soils generated from cuts throughout the site should generally be suitable for use as structural fill provided they are close to optimum moisture. The site soils encountered at our exploration sites will generally exhibit good soil strength when compacted to structural fill specifications. The presence of groundwater seepage in deeper utility and site excavations made in the northern portion of the site should be anticipated. Supplemental recommendations for controlling groundwater seepage should be provided by the geotechnical engineer during the grading activities, as appropriate. However, based on the data obtained from the test sites, and our overall characterization of subsurface conditions, extensive site dewatering will likely not be necessary for the proposed site development. Earth Solutions r-NV, lLC Seattle Redevelopment July 19, 2006 ES-0521 Page 5 This study has been prepared for the exclusive use of Seattle Redevelopment, LLC, and their representatives. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This study has been prepared in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. ESNW should have an opportunity to review final site plans to provide supplemental recommendations, as appropriate. Site Preparation and Earthwork The primary geotechnical considerations during the proposed site preparation and earthwork activities will involve structural fill placement and compaction, site drainage and erosion control. In-situ Soils From a geotechnical standpoint, the silty sand and sand soils encountered at the test sites are generally suitable for use as structural fill. Due to the generally granular nature of the native soils, use of these soils throughout the structural fill and penmanent fill slope areas of the site is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. The moisture sensitivity of the native soils can be generally characterized as moderate to high. Because the native soils are moderately to highly sensitive to moisture, successful use of the on-site soils will largely be dictated by the moisture content of the soils at the time of placement and compaction. Soils encountered during site excavations that are excessively over the optimum moisture conlent may require moisture conditioning prior to placement and compaction. Conversely, if the native soils are found to be dry at the time of placement, moisture conditioning through the application of waler may be necessary prior 10 compacting the soil. If the on-sile soils cannot be successfully compacted, the use of an imported soil may be necessary. Imported soil intended for use as structural fill should consist of a well graded granular soil with a maximum aggregate grain size of four inches, and a moisture content that is at or near the optimum level. During wet weather conditions, imported soil intended for use as structural fill should consist of a well graded granular soil with a fines content of five percent or less defined as the percent passing the #200 sieve, based on the minus three-quarter inch fraction. Structural Fill Placement In general, areas to receive structural fill should be sufficiently stripped of organic matter and other deleterious material. The observed lopsoil layer throughout the majority of the site is relatively thin, but is also moderately compressible in its present condition. As such, the geotechnical engineer should observe cleared and stripped areas of the site prior to structural fill placement. In our opinion, areas to receive at least four feet of fill will not require stripping prior to placement. However, areas where no stripping will occur should be mowed as low as possible prior to placing any fill. Earth Solutions MN. LlC Seattle Redevelopment July 19, 2006 ES-0521 Page 6 Structural fill is defined as compacted soil placed in foundation, slab-on-grade, and roadway areas. Fills placed to construct permanent slopes and throughout retaining wall and utility trench backfill areas are also considered structural fill. Soils placed in structural areas should be compacted to a relative compaction of ninety percent, in general accordance with the maximum dry density as determined by the Modified Proctor Method (ASTM D-1557-02) and placed in maximum twelve inch lifts. In pavement areas, the upper twelve inches of the structural fill should be compacted to a relative compaction of at least 95 percent and be in stable non-yielding condition. Excavations and Slopes The Federal and state Occupation Safety and Health Administration (OSHAIWISHA) classifies soils in terms of minimum safe slope inclinations. Based on the soil conditions encountered during our fieldwork, the site soils encountered to depths of up to four feet and the relatively cohesion less sand and gravel deposits observed in test sites TP-3 through TP-5, would be classified by OSHAIWISHA as Type C. Temporary slopes over four feet in height in Type C soils should be sloped no steeper than 1.5H:1V (Horizontal:Vertical). The glacial till soils encountered to depths of greater than four feet across the remainder of the site would generally be classified by OSHAIWISHA as Type A and B. Temporary slopes over four feet in height in Type A and Type B soils should be sloped at an inclination no steeper than O.75H:1V and 1 H: 1 V, respectively. If appropriate slopes cannot be achieved, temporary shoring may be necessary to support the excavations. Permanent slopes should maintain a gradient of 2H: lV, or flatter, and should be planted with an appropriate species of vegetation to enhance stability and to minimize erosion. The geotechnical engineer should observe temporary and permanent slopes to verify that the inclination is appropriate, and to provide additional grading recommendations, as necessary. Rockeries and Modular Block Walls In our opinion, the use of rockeries or modular block walls at this site is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint Rockeries or modular block walls over four feet in height will require an engineered design. ESNW can provide engineered rockery and modular block wall designs, upon request. The geotechnical engineer should review the final wall alignments and wall heights with respect to the proposed site grading. Earth Solutions t-NoI, LLC Seattle RedevelDpment July 19, 2006 Utility Trench Backfill ES-0521 Page 7 In Dur DpiniDn, the sDiis observed at the test sites are generally suitable fDr SUPPDrt Df utilities. Organic Dr highly cDmpressible sDiis encDuntered in the trench excavatiDns shDuld nDt be used fDr suppDrting utilities. In general, the native SDiis observed at the test sites shDuld generally be suitable for use as structural backfill in the utility trench excavations, provided the soil is at or near the optimum moisture content at the time of placement and compaction. Moisture conditioning of the soils may be necessary at some locations prior to use as structural fill. Utility trench backfill should be placed and compacted to the specifications of structural fill provided in this report, or to the applicable specifications of the City of Renton, as appropriate. Pavement Sections The performance of site pavements is largely related to the condition of the underlying subgrade. To ensure adequate pavement performance, the subgrade should be in a firm and unyielding condition when subjected to proofrolling with a loaded dump truck. Structural fill in pavement areas should be compacted to the specifications detailed in the Site Preparation and Earthwork section of this report. It is possible that soft, wet, or otherwise unsuitable subgrade areas may still exist after base grading activities. Areas of unsuitable or yielding subgrade will require remedial measures such as overexcavation and thicker crushed rock or structural fill sections prior to pavement. For relatively lightly loaded pavements subjected to automobiles and occasional truck traffic, the following pavement sections can be considered: • Two inches of asphalt concrete (AC) placed over four inches of crushed rock base (CRB), or; • Two inches of AC placed over three inches of asphalt treated base (ATB). The AC, ATB and CRB materials should conform to WSDOT specifications. Heavier truck-traffic areas generally require thicker pavement sections depending on site usage, pavement life expectancy, and site traffic.. ESNW can provide appropriate pavement section design recommendations for truck traffic areas and right-of-way improvements, as necessary. Additionally, the city of Renton Road Standards may supersede the recommendations prDvided in this report. Earth Solutions NW, lLC Seattle Redevelopment July 19,2006 Foundations ES-0521 Page 8 Residential structures for this site can be supported on conventional spread and continuous foundations bearing on competent native soils or structural fill, as appropriate. We anticipate competent native soil suitable for support of foundations will generally be exposed at depths of between two to four feel. Where loose or unsuitable soil conditions are exposed at foundation subgrade elevations, compaction of the soils to the specifications of structural fill, or overexcavation and replacement with structural fill may be necessary. Assuming the foundations are supported on competent, undisturbed native soils or suitable structural fill, the following parameters should be used for foundation design: • Allowable Soil Bearing Capacity • Friction • Passive Resistance 2,500 psf OAO 350 pcf (equivalent fluid) For short term wind and seismic loading, a one-third increase in the allowable soil bearing capacity can be assumed. A factor-of-safety of 1.5 has been applied to the friction and passive resistance values. With structural loading as expected, total settlement in the range of one inch is anticipated, with differential settlement of about one-half inch or less. The majority of the settlements should occur during construction, as dead loads are applied. Slab-Dn-Grade Floors Slab-on-grade floors for the proposed buildings should be supported on a firm and non-yielding subgrade consisting of competent native soil or structural fill. Unstable or yielding areas of the subgrade should be recompacted or overexcavated and replaced with suitable structural fill prior to construction of the slab. A capillary break consisting of a minimum of four inches of free draining crushed rock or gravel should be placed below the slab. The free draining material should have a fines content of five percent or less (percent passing the #200 sieve, based on the minus three-quarter inch fraction). In areas where slab moisture is undesirable, installation of a vapor barrier below the slab should be considered. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Seattle Redevelopment July 19, 2006 Retaining Walls ES-0521 Page 9 If retaining wall will be utilized at this site, they should be designed to resist earth pressures and any applicable surcharge loads. For design, the following parameters can be assumed for retaining wall design: • Active Earth Pressure (Yielding Wall) 35 pcf (equivalent fluid) • At-Rest Earth Pressure (Restrained Wall) 50 pcf • Traffic Surcharge (Passenger Vehicles) 70 psf (rectangular distribution) • Passive Resistance 350 pcf (equivalent fluid) • Coefficient of Friction 0040 Additional surcharge loading from foundations, sloped backfill, or other loading should be included in the retaining wall design, as appropriate. Drainage should be provided behind retaining walls such that hydrostatic pressures do not develop. If drainage is not provided, hydrostatic pressures should be included in the wall design, as appropriate. ESNW should review retaining wall designs to verify that appropriate earth pressure values and drainage have been incorporated into design, and to provide additional recommendations, as necessary. Retaining walls should be backfilled with free draining material that extends along the height of the wall, and a distance of at least eighteen inches behind the wall. The upper one foot of the wall backfill can consist of a less permeable (surface seal) soil, if desired. A rigid, perforated drain pipe should be placed along the base of the wall, and connected to an appropriate discharge location. A typical retaining wall and drainage detail is illustrated on Plate 3 of this report. Other drainage methods may be considered, and recommended by ESNW, as appropriate. Drainage Groundwater table was observed at depths of between seven and one-half and eight feet below existing grades in the north em portion of the site, at the time of our fieldwork (July 2006). As such, localized zones of groundwater seepage could be encountered in the site excavations in this area, particularly during the wetter winter months. Localized zones of perched seepage may also be encountered in deeper excavations within the glacial till soil deposits. Temporary measures to control groundwater seepage and surface water runoff during construction would likely involve interceptor trenches and sumps, as necessary. In our opinion, perimeter drains should be installed at or below the invert of building footings. A typical footing drain detail is provided on Plate 4 of this report. Earth S\Jlutions NW, LLC Seattle Redevelopment July 19, 2006 Seismic Considerations ES-0521 Page 10 The 2003 International Building Code specifies several soil profiles that are used as a basis for seismic design of structures. Based on the soil conditions observed at the test SITes, Site Class C, from table 1615.1.1, should be used for design. In our opinion, liquefaction susceptibility at this site can generally be characterized as low. The relative density of the site soils and the absence of a uniform, shallow groundwater table is the primary basis for this designation. LIMITATIONS The recommendations and conclusions provided in this geotechnical engineering study are professional opinions consistent with the level of care and skill that is typical of other members in the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. A warranty is not expressed or implied. Variations in the soil and groundwater conditions observed at the test sites may exist, and may not become evident until construction. ESNW should reevaluate the conclusions in this geotechnical engineering study if variations are encountered. Additional Services ESNW should have an opportunity to review the final design with respect to the geotechnical recommendations provided in this report. ESNW should also be retained to provide testing and consultation services during construction. Earth Solutions ffW, LLC u... SE 163RD ST':I 51 V) S[ l~TH . Reference: King County Map 656 By Thomas Brothers Maps Dated 2007 NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color ESNW cannol be responsIble for any subsequent misinterpretation of the information resulling fnom black & while reproductions of ttl~ plale DlWn. Vicinity Map Bremerton Avenue Townhomes Renton, Washington GLS Date 07/1 Proj No. 0521 SSR Date July 2006 Plate 1 I -100 JO..r JO:? -100 \ r --------- - - --~~---- --------- - ---1---- "'I I -IO"! I I ITP-4 -0- I 1 I "" I TP-5 -0- I I -0- TP-31 o 1.110 o I : DO L - - - - --- - --1-____ 1 I I I I -0- I TP-2 I I I a -11°1 I -0- I TP-1 _~~~._~ .. 1.20 I Scale in Feet I I _______ ~ _____________ .J--_. LEGEND TP-l-,-Approximate Location of ESNW Test Pit, Proj. No. ES-0521, July 2006 Subject Site NOTE: The graphics shown on Ih~ plale are nol inlended for design purposes or precise scal:e measurements, but only fa illustrate the app-oximate test locations relative to the approximate Iocalions of ex~ling and I or proposed sije fealures The inlonnalion U1uslraled is largely based on dala provided by Ihe dienl allhe lime of our sludy ESNW canna! be responsible for subsequent design changes or inle!pfelalion a! the data by others. J12 I Test Pit Location Plan Bremerton Avenue Townhomes Renton, Washington NOTE: This plale may amlain areas of color ESNWcannol be Drwn. GLS Date 0711712006 Proj. No. 0521 responsible [or any subsequent mrsinterpre1a1ion of the information resulling from blacl< & while reproductions of Ihis plale SSR Date July 2006 Plate 2 18" Min. . o~o,,:o6<> o • J) 0. <> 'I> "0 '" "'0 <> 0" Oo·.:=~ <> "0,,<>00;>0" "0 00 ",0 <> "'oOoooq,og 00 '"' .,00 ,,<>0 Co 0'" 0 ,..po 0",0 <> u 00 "0 <>., Q C! 0 .. 0 0 0" "'0 "0 I.":",,. co <> 0 ... 0 <> <> 0 CI .. ' .," 0 <> <>.. "'0", <> ~ -(),; 0 "0"000 "e U <> ~O <> " <> <> 0 <> 0"0 ~ <> <> <> <> eo "0<> '" : 0 <> <> 0" <> Q <> 0""0 0 <>.. 0 " ,,00"0 o-cr ---;-,,-;-:=.,-,-==--i!' ~~~1 <> "" 0 0 .. .. <> <> "'0 <> Og .,0 0 D" Q., 0 .. 0 rs> o 9 <> 0 Oo"\:. <> =~~o~ NOTES: • Free Draining Backfill should consist of soil having less than 5 percent fines Percent passing #4 should be 25 to 75 percent. structural Fill Perforated Drain Pipe (Surround In Drain Rock) • Sheet Drain may be feasible in lieu of Free Draining Backfill, per ESNW recommendations SCHEMATIC ONLY -NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCnON DRAWING • Drain Pipe should consist of perforated, rigid PVC Pipe surrounded with 1" Drain Rock. LEGEND: I::: :: :::: 1 Surface Seal; Native S~il or other : :: :: :::: Low Permeability Matenal Free Draining Structural Backfill 1 inch Drain Rock RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL Bremerton Avenue Townhomes Renton, Washington No. 0521 SSR Date July 2006 Plale 3 NOTES: • Do NOT tie roof downspouts to Footing Drain. • Surface Seal to consist of Perforated (Surround 12" of less permeable, suitable soil. Slope away from building. LEGEND: 1<':-: < <I Surface Seal; native soil or : ~ ~ ~::: ~: : other low permeability material. 1" Drain Rock 2" (Min.) Drain Pipe 1" Rock) Slope .. .... SCHEMATIC ONLY -NOT OT SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL Bremerton Avenue Townhomes Renton, Washington GLS Date 07/19/2006 No. 0521 SSR Date July 2006 Plate 4 ---I APPENDIX A SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION ES-0521 The subsurface conditions at the site were explored by excavating a total of five test pits. The approximate test pit locations are illustrated on Plate 2 of this report. The test pit logs are provided in this Appendix. The subsurface exploration was completed in July 2006. Logs of the test pits are presented in Appendix A. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. In actuality, the transitions may be more gradual. Earth Solutions NW, llC Earth Solutions NWLLC SOil CLASSIFICATION CHART MAJOR DIVISIONS TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS COARSE GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50 QA OF MATERIAL IS LARGER THAN NO, 200 SIEVE SIZE FINE GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN SO"A OF rMlERlAllS SMALlER THAN NO 200SIEVE SIZE GRAVEL AND GRAVELLY SOILS MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION RETAINED ON NO 4 SIEVE SAND AND SANDY SOILS MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION PASSING ON NO 4 SIEVE SILTS AND CLAYS SILTS AND CLAYS CLEAN GRAVELS (LITTlE OR NO FINES) GRAVELS WITH FINES {APPRECIABLE AMOUNT O. FINES) CLEAN SANDS (llTTI.E OR NO FINES) SANDS WITH FINES IAPPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF FINES) UQUIDUMrT LESS THAN 50 lIaUID LIMIT GREATER THAN 50 HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS GW GP GM GC SW SP SM SC OL MH CH OH PT WEll-GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL- SAND MI;cr1JRES. LITTlE OR NO fiNES POORLY-GRAOED GRAVELS, GRAVEl-SAND MIXTURES. LImE ORNOFINES SilT'( GRAVELS. GRAVEL· SAND· SILT MIXTURES eLA YEY GRAVELS. GRAVEL -SAND- CLAY MIXTURES WELL-GRADED SANDS, GRAVEllY SANDS. UTTLE OR NO FINES POQRLY-GRAOE[) SANDS. GRAvaL Y SAND. LJTne OR NO FINES SilTY SANDS. SAND -SILT MIXTURES CUYEY SANDS. SAND-CLAY MIXTURES ORGANIC SIL is AND ORGANIC SILlY CLAYS OF lOW PLASTICITY INORGANIC SilTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND OR SILTY SOILS INO~GANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PlASTICITY ORGANIC etA YS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY. ORGANIC SILTS PEAT. HUMUS, SWAMP SOILS WITH HIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS DUAL SYMBOLS are used to indicate borderline soil classifications The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the material presented in the attached logs. Earth Solutions NW I LLC 2881152ndAvenue N E Redmond. WA 98052 Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CLIENT Seattle Redevelopment PROJECT NUMBER DATE STARTED _7"'1""'11"'10"'6'---__ _ COMPLETED ...,7"-11,,1,,106"'-__ _ TEST PIT NUMBER TP-1 PROJECT NAME Bremerton Avenue Townhomes PROJECT LOCATION PAGE 1 OF 1 TEST PIT SIZE ________ _ EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR ..,N"W"'-"E"'x"'ca"'v"'a"tin"'Q'-______ _ GROUND ELEVATION -"4,,,10,-,ftL-__ GROUND WATER LEVElS: EXCAVATIONMETHOD ___________________ ___ LOGGEOBY~WL~R~ ____ _ CHECKED BY -,S,-,S",R~ ____ _ NOTES Depth of Topsoil & Sod 6": sad W Q. :z: ~ffi 1;: .. WID W--':ii 0 Q.::J ~z TESTS Me= 7.50% Fines!:: 21 ,80% MC= 1220% en 0 en ;:; SM SM 0 Ie> 0.0 ~-' t'} ~trace cobbles 4" to 7- -possible seepage ..tJecomeswet -becomes dense AT TIME OF EXCAVATION -= ___________ _ ATENDOFEXCAVATION~~ ___________ _ AFTER EXCAVATION - MATERIAL DESCRIPTION groundwater seepage 8oHom of test ph at 9 0 feet Earth Solutions NW, LLC 2881 152nd Avenue N E Redmond, WA 98052 Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CUENT Seattle Redevelopment PROJECT NUMBER DA'IE STARTED _7u.1.!-'11"'/O"s'-__ _ COMPLETED~7~11~1"'m~S'_ __ EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR ~N-"W'-'-'Ex"""ca"'v"'a"'lin"'g'_ ______ _ EXCAVATION METHOD ____________ _ LOGGEDBY_W~LR~ ____ _ CHECKED BY -'S"'S"'R'-__ _ NOTES Depth of T.ODsoil & Sod 6": sod w "-0 :c r:ffi en J:c> f-_ w Ol 0 ~s. TESTS "-0 ..,:i; en ~.., 0 "-:> ::j :i;z c> « (1) SM MC=S.60% SM -cobbles up to 8" TEST PIT NUMBER TP·2 PROJECT NAME Bremerton Avenue Townhomes PROJECT LOCATION PAGE 1 OF 1 GROUND ELEVATION .-:4'i1"-0,,,ff __ _ TEST PIT SIZE ____ _ GROUND WA TIER LEVELS: AT TIME OF EXCAVATION -==-__________ _ AT END OF EXCAVATION -== ___________ _ AFTER EXCAVATION - MA'IERIAL DESCRIPTION -beeotnes very dense -becomes wet MC~ 910% atB.O 8ottom of test pit at 8 0 feet • Earth Solutions NW, LLC TEST PIT NUMBER TP-3 2881152nd Avenue N E, PAGE 1 OF 1 Redmond, WA 98052 Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CLIENT Seattle Redevelo2ment PROJECT NAME Bremerton Avenue Townhomes PROJECT NUMEER 0521 PROJECT lOCATION Renton Washington DATE STARTED 7111106 COMPLETED 7111/06 GROUND ElEVATION 420 ft TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating GROUND WATER lEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION lOGGED BY WLR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION - NOTES DeJ;;!lh of TOQsoir & Sod 12~: sod & blackberrY bushes AFTER EXCAVATION - UJ [g ~ffi en 2 UJ<O rj IC!) TESTS "-0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION -':E en ~...J D "-::J :::i ~z C!) UJ 0 , .. " " .' Brown silty SAND with gravet, loose. moist · . · .' .. '. ' SM " ' -.cobbles up to 5" ' .. '" " " ' · '" 3.5 4~6.5 MC~3.3D% : .... Gray poorty graded SAND wtlh sift and gravel, medium dense, moist ~ .,;' Fines = 9.10% SP-.... --L 8M .. .<. .. :: 6.0 414.0 Gray poorly graded GRAVEL with sand, loose to medium dense, moist GP-, GM ,C 7,' 412,5 Me = 1.90% Test pit terminated at 7 5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 7 5 feet Earth Solutions NW. LLC 2881 152nd Avenue N E Redmond, WA 98052 Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 cUENT seattle Redevelopment PROJECT NUMBER DATE STARTED -,7"-/1,-,1",/0,,,6 __ _ COMPLETED _7,,/1,,1"'10"'6'---__ EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR -'N"W!L!E"'x"'c"'av"'a"'tin"'q'--______ _ EXCAVATION METHOD _____________ _ LOGGED BY --'W"'L"'Rl..... ___ _ CHECKED BY -,S",S",R~ __ _ NOTES Deplh of Topsoil & Sod 4"; sod W :I: ~ffi ll:=-w'" w-...J:!E 0 tl.:::> ~z rn TESTS MC= 810% Me = 26,10% Fines = 18 50% Me = 21.50% ,,; 0 ,,; :i SM SM SM ~ ..water table NUMBERTP-4 PAGE 1 OF 1 PROJECT NAME Bremerton Avenue Townhomes PROJECT LOCATION GROUND ELEVATION -,4",OO"-,,It~ __ GROUND WATER LEVELS: TEST PIT SIZE _____ _ .¥'. AT TIME OF EXCAVATION _7c,.5"-!!.ft",,1 E"'I"'ev"'3,,9"'2"'.S"'ft'-_____ _ ATENDOFEXCAVAnON~ __________ _ AFTER EXCAVATION - MATERIAL DESCRIPTION BoHom of test pit at 8 5 feet Earth Solulions NW, LLC 2881152nd Avenue N E Redmond, WA 98052 Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CUENT Seattle Redevelopment NUMBER DATESTARTEO ..J7.L/1U1",/O,,-S __ _ COMPLETED ..J7CL/l!jl",/O",S:..-__ EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR -1N"'W"'-'E"'x"'ca.,v"'a"'tin"'o'-________ _ EXCAVATIONMETHOD _____________ _ LOGGED BY -1WL"""R'--___ _ CHECKED BY -'S"'S"'R'--__ _ NOTES Deptih of TopsoiJ & Sod 4R: sod w a. u I ~ffi en rC!) b:£ w'" TESTS c.i 0.0 w-.... :;; "' ~ .... 0 a.::> :i :;;z: C!) « III SM MC=1120% TEST PIT NUMBER TP-5 PROJECT NAME Bremerton Avenue Townhomes PROJECT LOCATION PAGE 1 OF 1 GROUND ELEVATION -"4"'OO'-'ft'--__ GROUND WATER LEVELS: TEST PIT SIZE ______ 1 AT TIME OF EXCAVATION -"' ____________ J ATENDOFEXCAVATlON~:..-__________ __ AFTER EXCAVATION - MATERIAL DESCRIPTION -becomes medium dense -becomes medium to coarse sand -seepage at S' MC=1780% grade, seepage encountered Bottom oftest pit at 10.0 feet APPENDIXB LABORATORY TEST DATA ES-0521 Earth Solutions NVV, lLC • Earth Solutions NW. LLC GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION 2881 152nd Avenue N E Redmond. WA 98052 Telephone: (425) 264-3300 Fax: (425) 284-2855 CUENT Seattle RedeveJogment PROJECT NAME Bremerton Ave Townhomes PROJECT NUMBER J;~521 PROJECT loeA nON S.,HI. U S. SIEVE OPENING ~ INCHes I u.s. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 -4:J 2 1 34 112318 3 4 • 810 141B 20 30 40 so &0 1DC 1411200 100 I ~' :"'-l... : ,I I I I I I : 95 --.., : 90 : : 1\ : : 85 \ 80 : l 75 : :~ 70 I-65 :I: Cl 60 ~ :1" t'-., : >-55 "" ........ \ '" '" UJ 50 z : u: I-45 z : : J\ 1\ IU 0 40 '" IU : 1\ Il. 35 '\ : 30 \ ~ 25 : : \ : : 20 15 \ : "'\ 10 5 : : 0 100 10 1 0,,1 0,01 0001 GRAIN SIZE IN MIWMETERS \ COBBLES I GRAVEL I SAND I SILT OR CLAY 1 coarse I fine I coarse medium I fine I _L PL PI Cc Cu ~. TP-01 3.5ft. Brown silly SAND with r~YAI, 8M ~III TP~ 4.Oft. Ught brown poorlll ! 8ANDwith, n"'YA. 0.29 50.38 fl .... TP-04 5.5ft. , silty SAND, SM ~ ~ il 0100 060 030 010 O,-,.,~"ol %Sand %Silt %Clay • TP-01 3.Sft . 37.5 3.396 0.165 37.8 40.4 21.8 III TP-03 4.Oft. 37.5 4.241 0.322 0.084 39.1 51.8 9.1 ( TP-04 5.5ft. 19 0.256 0.122 3.5 78.0 18.5 ~ Erai§ l<n:18§er PARTIES OF RECORD Orange Grove Cottages PUD LUA08-139, ECF,CU-H, PPUD Marc Rousso ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC 20921 120tl. Ao~' ioe r~E sce: JayMarc Development 5555 Relltol I Village 13ldce ste, H"t'S J&M Land Development, Inc. 5555 Renton Village Place ste: #775 BetRell, WA 9S81r ,Be"!",,, 'IIA 98855 Renton, WA 98055 tel: (423) 4139144 tel: (425) 226-9100 tel: (425) 226-9100 =1: Erai§ Iw'eger@esmci"iI,GsFR (applicant) (owner) (contact) C' :it:: .:&-t.lL! :;:).uJ~ BI vd I\J E- 334 ro '8{h Ave. 0 \ 2C5 SlLCk E~ t--ePkfllJ ~.:J. q~'C~ Ketbion I u.l A q \i5\o Updated: 12/02/08 (Page 1 of 1) Orange Grove Cottages: Neighborhood Map 1 inch = 200 feet Legend --Streets D Site :------., L. ____ l Parcels D City Boundary CO N SU L T I NG E N G I N EERS .L G The ORANGE GROVE COTTAGES PRELIMINARY PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENT prepared for JAY MARC DEVELOPMENT, LLC. Vicinity Map GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER EARTH SOLUTIONS N.W. 2881 152ND AVE NE REDMOND, WASHINGTON 98052 (425) 284-3300 CONTACT: RAYMOND A. COGLAS, P.E. P.O. BOX 2566 RENTON, WA 98059 Contact: MARC ROUSSO 425-226-9100 Sheet Index prepared by SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION NOVEMBER 3, 2008 339'5 1st Way South, #200 FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98003 Phone-(253) 838-6113 ESM JOB NO. 1241-043-006 SHEET 1 OF 9 COY ST-1 GR-l UT-l SD-1 EX-1 L-1 L-2 L-3 COVER SHEET PRELIMINARY SrrE PLAN CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN PRELIMINARY UTIUlY PLAN PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE CONTROL PlAN TOPOGRAPHY MAP PRELIMINARY lANDSCAPE PLAN PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE LEGEND, DETAILS, AND NOTES TREE INVENTORY PLAN PLANNER/ENGINEER/SURVEYOR ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC 33915 1ST WAY SOUTH, #200 FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98003 (253) 838-6113 CONTACT: CRAIG KRUEGER BRIANNE GASTFIELD, P.E. ','- \--\ A PORTION OF THf': N W 1':4 Of-' Sf::C flON 15, ,\0 _..{) TOWNSHTf-> 23 NORTH, RANGf-(]f) F-'AS T, W M /".\'\ c."-l \Y~ 0.\'\.)'8":,://' , (.0 N,E, 3RD LANE / I ./Ir:0 &:' c. 1 r '~';'\::\'YS'~ ! '.., . _ \;;~ ,9'_-<;'0'f 1-'::i-1 " 0~.,)\ _ \; ::;. \~f. "'-';>-> ,~ ,,(,:? C:~'-.¢.(-, , .\\yV 0.0 ",. '\ <;; -',-~ '! ~ .. ",e';" '. .... .~-.. ,/' . ';"""'!i; . "j,V·:;i':'n~. __ .. ~/~~ .. , n -;:::z ..'~~.)~:"H . ·---i··T.,· / <' _". .,,;r ">: . lOOP ROAD A' ....•. /~ ,.' '''';''}-lej i (!~j' ..,'C ,3.. t':'=" ' .. ~ "f-:;------c'=. ---:-:~/:;< ;: '1 u... '-..t-..., -':',,, '" 'C~'.-'OQ 'P .c.,.'_' FP_4O'SO, F' _L04'" ."" ',",\'.-.. j'., " .... :J : \ __ '':' 5 ~" FOV 1 •• L ' t+3::~b,' ";:~tr ~",-~ ~[;:"lC'111' 1-11 \\ ------" ! 1"0 ~ t fFl: "~ ~.. .' ~,~~;'T, ~ ['. ~ "~ -~. c_ :'"1'. 'I ;. ~r1 D[l.· a) ,-LL\,.JJ ,,c,, L-' -__ ~ I I •• t l' ~ ,I I:::J I . 10 .:Ii· 1a:11-----J ,~~- e,,~o",," BLOC, ~'" :;-.-q , . . [!.{D\\r 'G~/ ~ --G;'I"~~ / 05l "L-rr=B--"c"", \-, I ;~'i;--~-l'l:' I ')" .,." , .. ,., I' ,,',' ... ,.,,,,,,,, ........ , ',' ' .... i C--. ,-'~':'.' .• ,I:,. ':, '" ""'1 =" "I~r@:., .... ,(l:\~~::-... ,I§".--!I· "I' , I I, , ,. "",,,, . " , '. -' ~. :"'1,~ ... ~.,,.;1tB,,...+I-."---'--c...-. ~'-·.Cr I,' iLc~ I,. ..' ..• '., .. }/d-// ..... j~"' .. 11 c~'\ 0.<-/~) C':oV' ~~:~>\'AY "\ i.'. j'.tr~)J. :'·.·.~T. '. ".~Tr,·· ".{ .... r C --T\ r . I"'" //. // , '" -~ :'f-"--1-'\"~ ______ ~'i t--L~-2p_~o~~ J ,. i'y~-'--C:::---=-=_':_---~I+-: I~'~" cr:~n ";;-Ij --4-----'f I I --~ )ir .. ~' ""_,,; .: ,I f '0' . i '. ~' [ -.-,~'"~n~~:r .. c:KJ "-,':".1'1 -&<y,,0 I , _. "=::;-1 \1 1--'-'1 I i .1" ". ,~' , l>·..l ..... tn. ",I ,I I. f+-' . }....d .. ~ .. r L.,.j -''"''. " ! L: '. , l. ,I . 1 : H- I ~. "r-: -L_~_ ---'-' ---------' ---~\._r-v0,~~-\ " -''0''> « \ " -\~.p;'-!?_)\p..':;J ~ n ( r SCALE 20' ,~~----~~-------;, l~ONTOlF' INT~"',A LEGEND ,:v,,,," ~O>,-( .," ~":)Pc,c ; CO,'Coo PR(,""O:E' '0' '.-C"-,,"" .. , --.'0-- "c,.:,~., CeoTERU", ""'"""_ '''0 """~ IW''',,' ::,;=:~ • , ~2L~I~ .oL'At-OllE;~_<q~~_::5'~D!"G ",(n_, 'C_" .c,_~" '~C_l,J' ~'TEP". ,.0" i;T-;)"" :""~c ;-[T,N'10' o'''-<~ ,,-,---" >""'-, AM.'''' ~'f _ "'",H~",I \\'1'[ "' -'~rA'''O ··"M l"''''' ~ .. ,:,,, -"""cR, SOUA~F'_OF DAT_~ ~i) r: j )if! ;H f~ j; i:~ j1s ~; }~ H q , 'f f~ if ~ ,,~ ~ ~; ~ ~ ~ m f- Z W :; IL o ..J W > W o o [[ « :; ~ .., (/) W (') « f- , !: ~~ :t f-~ O~ 0 0 W~ >~ O~ a:~ (')~ W 8 (') z « a: o GR-' , 0 ,-,/;),\;~0 'i':30~,O\)0 ' c'< N,E_ 3RD LANE y{;\ .\~j ~>->!\ "'\ ,,,,,,, -\'~~ - ~;""( "C"- ~,l' " " , L ~\o;;O A PORllON OF THE N_W_ 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 2~~ NORTH_ RANGe 05 E:.AST, W_M -0' 1_-------"_\_----\__ ..-:"to --0"' '7 ---------~ ,i \ '. \.> ~Y\\-0.~~~:l-<;0 't,V'", -<:--/, _c",·f ~C .. :;;:/,.-' \..' (1'<-"' \':;''v'vC'0>-." 0' \ ; :0'0';: -"", ' _'Jo'_._ -'-!.-I I ! '\\~\0\''''\'';--'\- ",'", _,-'3G<Y'::~,_:--:::.__ -:~:'-,,---.. '~~----~r"l ~,""C~ " r ----~'" -, ~-;?: ~,t, -' ',' ---LOOP ROAD A ----~:---__ :--'. ,,~--s -~, ",~."'~. 1 ',--, _J -~~'-',,-, ~" ;T" "",' \ "" J. ,-'ji--'I-"_, ==:lTTY,', "'1 ", \' II ,.~ '. '\,H.::.---"ii , W -+ l 1 \ --I,' , I' , e r ~ " ,m 1 .~. I: 1 " --' , ., " cD,c-' . r-', I ::> _, , ~: ',IJ. ~.' ,. :o'---.i..LC) "".-, _' ,". ' [,0 ", ',.'. TrR,.':':;". ; ,: 'Sll 1..:{loo ,,---, -I --",' ',' _ 1 ~'TRAC1D Iz: : ""'rr TRACTA ':, 'cD ,",-'. "'-" , ~":J-.' 1 . "".'_,mj!; ", ," 'I [[,' ",', , " .'~ , ~' ,L ', •• ,,! .:::'::._ '.'." ., ____ --: '. "__ ____ ________ __! : 'ffi_ft'T "'1"' c 1 ";-r---:--lIF·! I ,-- 'II I .l~, , ! 'I' ""'I --' --"CC]" -I T~,~;;,C , 1 ---"0' " ,,' ~' I:~,,,, _I ' ",~'_,_,' ,; " ,. I I , ',_ __ , ~' "--_J I ' --,-. " in"" ;;;-.." "':r--~',,-, J =-'~' / If] . '-',.-:-~','.":, ',~ ], I"~, , I" ( .. \ 1 " ;: ~ __ '" " ,"",t""] ~", '.iF." T., .. T,. " 1. _""', ,.,',' . '. -" ... /, ... /.:... . j " -" "', , . "-LOOP ROAD A 1.[, y-__ /_ " ' ...... , : '" ", . .c ,',c, '"""," ,,,,,,,' --}-I, , __ <'.,. '., ' ' ,--.-''''';,~-=-,---+--,c,----:;:-----",-,c~l''''~, . r" 1\ ',,' ," '1 1 '\ 'I 'L-.J.+'~~I; " ~ II " r ,," 1 -.--' =tiJH i ",w': 1 " J n ,"~C~IC , ":,,"1 I ': lsi ." 11 ,,! ~ "" '''i''C"D''''j'l ",,, ,~,:GEND 1_ "':'''~T i'=-,"--l i , I Dr" r--:J ,I \' '::;'.::::;' ,) L ::' __ ""l ~-'-"'-~------l '('" (p' ,,' ,<", ,~:,O' <,;::::'~c_ C/?':",J\'i/ :~~~'I \\X'~) "-",, srr.~ __ q~T~ ',," .r,~'R-"· !'~ :'R,~_,r;T~" AVC""->,' R"HJ~,. ~. 98C59 ,s"",~"> ",,"fl ,~v"," 10l"~ g"J" "D '~2300 ;'9, "oJ"_ \If, ""J. ,,!C],"r;," "":'I'O'oll' "(,],,,C ,--",C' ,p,-; ""I>":~:, lV.,tj ""WU' I"<OVII"" ~.n" ,'",,':.0'" >I~f IH,,""I 'U,-"'I<'"' -"m,',rpl.('II~' ""'''''' ,,,,"'-," O<N,:"t AR'X, '3 4~" Sf-: I "', -.:: C'_,~!!l~U. '~rl~,'" s,,;. r --~~'-v ,[,5,:rN:r ;C11'~f 'iG,"W. orvc c,p","- L'J;F~ ,'f"~' ''''R elf'-u "''''~' ","r~,. o~"r' SC, .. "; ,","~Y t,':, DEVEL9Pt.l§lJT STANDARDS CA :Uc:'":' ,"'01>0<0 i,,c ,>, ,,'" ,,"',-- (":C, 7,",<" :CO'<J') , ,,~,.,,:; ~ " " NO"" ~ ;Ii o~';",~LG " ~ .,'" >-JU"NC) " fr) r~_ " ~5 T"ACT AnCA TAm, --~-'7,;,---~ (~--" .. ")I"" rOOl""" ",' 1" __ "..0"" :5' o-.. CP<-.C, "AA. m-", T'WOT ""'~ ,.',; 1_08 -:0 '"0" lLoe "08 ,0"0 ""0 .,"" '" 'it", ",e 50" ",'" ,3" '" " "" , " ",--'"' "02 '" ,-" , ""j,. ,"" "lC <;-'0 000 2-' 030 ""0 '.160 1.'(,0 T;)-'" ,,:IT ~"E'-."""',' ~ on K; ""'"' F"T ,OT ARlO.<-. ,03< " (L~r ':' lAAG"ST LOT "'fA ,,r''>6 ;,cr 25) A",-'<'C' LOT "''<EA ',5'8 SF T'~-"" B,-Ic;JING COIIm'OGO-J2~ ,,~ ,,~ ,.~ .., .,)~ ",~ ""~ '" ," .", ,0'. ," .. , "" ~,~ ,;~ ",. -".,,~ .. ~ ~~i f'"'' " ~~ ill U ~§ ~~ l i~ E !J ~ ~i ] ~ m : , ' : t~ Jf ud W ~ CJ r « z I- w I-:; Oz a. 9 001 w w~ > >m W 0 or 0 n:1 a: Q)~ " :; ~ >-W " CJ ., z « , II: ~ 0' § ""NO ,'-.",' - ~~ ~., ST-1 2 , 1'''1 I0~ :,: ').,~,)~ \0-' Y (P\~ 1- J) /' / N.E. 3RD LANE -~'" --'\:>:\~~(;' \, ,;'\Y..:' \,...} C;.J0 "'\ ',; '1":.0'( c ~'0~~ .-,(. I ~ I • 0\):\~\~'V " c .... / • . ' '1---' A PORTION OF THE N.W 1.'4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 05 EAST. W M \':;/~ 0° ~.--<\ \;;::. G'f\~~y '0~y'~00P.' ) ·i =l~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~====~~;;~~~~~~~~ !~L ,1 T :.::\ \,':-i "i.,,' 4t~-:::+'--:'-c-"~"---il'" t8L-'--l~J~~ It;j;~V~ 4-i-·~ r _.~'.',~,''-.,- i"~ I j;,~ 'V :'f;') +-':"i"'J,j~",~ --Jk -'~'~-J , '-l; " ' ~T Jl; -TRAr:TD t w"flJ I ' "",,, ',I,' -I ','''''' ' , z _ ':i ' ,c-,<' w .~_;_ : ; - -I .-(;\I;:./.:&s ::J !_, ~: '.-'-' \6"1'> Z i. I y\\v~"I'\'\Y W .,,..,-"'i I ~C) > r ~.' I \ (I' ,-g <.' '+-~ "" .',", '''~ (1'-' :·.t'_T5'-?OP~.-, 'i-;j-,/ , 't \", \ \, ~.-.> -'I '. /" \.. £ ~ ,~ LOOP ROAD A\ -~ .. L- -T __ ;>;~--) 1 " <· ... S· \':It--- (,y\>' I i , , i_'~~ ::'-__ ...... __ .:...:..._ CC"" I eil r" ,I I 21J I .\-':-_ 'II ' \\'" /, I: ':L~t:EO~I:-:-i" I FAJiK 1~ i 'D rl-\ / ... , J " '\' , "" 1 _of ~ i-'t'--" __ -~I ,:, /1,'"" I r 'l . ~:ii >lJ "" , rl .. ~.. -~ ~s\ 'y'-r"S-;\ !,,)';'\\.<--(. .... ' 'yY' ?\v' .... n ~ r SCA'-E'.' 1 ,. -~o CUN1GUHIr...ILkVA.l .~ ,EC,,~,NP -'Y'"C ,P"-" toW' • , = ""-Ar<, $['.:" ",,~,,~_, • • :<'n'~ w'OER 'M", cw,n"~ [,0, ·,we,,"' «ICT""UTrP"ETF" , :,~ ~.: ,! "," ',1 I) ~e k ij < " ~: ~; J ~: :~ f} -1£1< ~ J~ .!.~ ~ f, ~' ! t atI ~~ U) ; ~ ! f-<! z f- W f- ~ 03 o 0 ~ uj W S ~ > 5 o 0 > () IT: ~ [[ In '> -::r: u Gl ~ W ~ ~ (9 Z <! ' IT: ! o ' @ LJT-1 , , ' .'"I\~;0 <.,q(;Y;--:,y":<' , ... CrJ - A POH T ION 01-THE:: N W ,\ \"\0',0,\) ~ '4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 05 EAST. W M i,"'f'''-';t~;~,~~~ o 4 C;\ \0> eX (l:0 ,\-,' .' \.---\Jr' y\';.v,,;;c ,_ ""'~':;.',;:c s"JP~:;:T.' I --'()~ 0\ .~S I ' Y~,y\\v~~?, ,~_ .. _w -":~-~-I L'Y\\~';";:'\\.(.~Y :'-,--":1 .. -~(.S\I I , I ! 1 d ' -.-.L----__ ... _____ ---..:--______ T :;c "'_ ~"'oN"-,0 T', ,,,"1" ':TO"" """ .... CE 0" ~;ZJih1-~{<f~-'t~~f77i/ /~ +~ ~ I (z0~ / /~~~$/~~ /~/~ ~_.' I.: ~" J~t1 Jv A 0-1 '" ", 7 • I . <I,., I \ F 1 I 2 4 5 .... <'. /.. ~"'-f"OPQ'~D 50'"' '~':LTY ,.,.l ' , ' . (. ,~m"m'".' I • _ _ ., i)i ! Ir. ! ~'r";,",,~ ~j'l~t;;:;An';: --.... :'1(1' :, '~" ,~"-" .... . ~~., '-'i "TR~:J " i I~)~.,"""" ;~~:::\~ .bJ: '~~ .. ~~·'_.t-}_ -.'''''''1 1 r:'" / '.H. •. ~ ,LI' I .. -1' .' 7 // "j<h\ ,~ !-'--_~ c/ .. . : • 1'-'1" ""' .. ~. l-~\I~ Il-,f ,;\ 'f,>S-.~ . C \0"'" '[\\\'<;10;P' <0 N E 3R;) LANE ~I I!' -~';AI"oCTC ~ ----=----• I I! II I I:'; I ."' :ljji' I' III '--'t ~ I, -Ii : ffi I :,: I -!,' ~ I ~ _J , _ '--A.:fi IA. :,1;.:" . I.. '····1::-0· '1":. "" / ". I _ /. I ~ I" ~rz'" .. ~ .. " I k"/' .-\~"" '1!l .. ,",1.'~'-' .J' ... ,.:,,-, 1\ "'0._. "/".~'. 12: . .' ,; t . "; ,. " .-. .' / 1dJ ,,;.,;VL;_; ___ ;:,_ .. ,. ""'1) ~ __ . __ .:.,;,...///>_:,'; I L i· " .. ~., -, . 7 ----.' ...... ~ ... r l_ \ I ",",' • '.e" " ',"ee'C . tG ~'f;~ ,,/V' y..y\J\ i I i ~ 1 I.-,--- 'I [if-~. -.1,1 ,,- IHACI I i "\:'f U '~. '.. vL= ~' .~ i: I" ok] "I I t~_-~ , ,~0Y~S"; 'I'~I;..V-". -\ \~p-.\.!.--:>r--\.t>.S'i:--• n SCflL<o' I"' ~ 2S' "~" 81,· LEGEND ~P'c,pc.;m ST_"'M <',A-C' =,~ -'-'c, CA'," "'-',~ ,",", ""'1,," ,'0" .. ""'" {>6"": (;AT;" c""~ "?~MWAID' "ACIUT' ,. (~ '::"., __ L/. WfJ'lILO_N fA.CiWI::. 5W\OfJARY '0";. 00,."o,'$ A"f, • 078 ~c D!;TP'~IC~/WA-ER CU"'-.IT< \>~lLT "'OJIR,: DU"","" ~"'_"'IUtD P~ILI~""'" '"'n-~r",, ~ '8,<" 5T.9R~;:E~_ FAril TY .,-(,.".0', 'i'ffR '.Ltk'f p",,',o[D PP[u","-'J"'Y #A' " 0."---r--'·:ocr ,.:.! 8 J ~,~' i, J'-~$ !,i l' ~! h .. '~ ,I i' I gHH!l ~ ~ ~ !~ r ,~ ? t--r--., >-Z ClJ :; :l. :J -' w > w o U 0: " :; ~ -, (J) ~ W, (') <t f- f- 0 3 ()~ ~ W§ >15 O~ o:~ (')~ WO (') Z <t § 0: l o ~ 6 ---- __ , - SO,1 , 9 '~''.'-''\."'\''~ ,,~\"" ,~','''''," ~\-\" " .... """M"";""'''''''' .--7= '\';1 .1, " I I I , I ~ I t 1-~ " :t ('o~ (.1-1'.'0 ~ 'z. " . /1 i~ l~i 'I ' J__________ A '. / _ m \:L!; I ~ ~~----'----/ ,< " ~ _~~'"-'~~~~~~.=_;""". »# ~ '!j~;i,J ' " L. :---=:i :~~~;~, :_ :\It,,::'"~_,"e;";''~~T~ '1---4---~-----L---~'"'-" ''''i'~t7-......---~--------,~c ',-, '{, ."\\ o'~'\ , ;) C,,-1,; 'II! :; ... i... , ": '~,,' 'r'-, I 8"Q ., t' ,... ~ r ---0" I ,! __ L~___ . ':l~~~, / I ..-/ 1:.<.'< 1 i I II -< ~ I"" ". 'f' il'l..; ;,~ : t 0 J.1' ;',~1-,\"'" ~ :" ___ ~ ~/ ,-I, ,',,\..;\ftr~.A , "c"'~""'; +---, " '. ,'·,,'"I."'h\-O > --. c'~ ~.-'-, '/$,:1.,. /'1'0 I" 1~,~.A~>t:-1--lJ , .. ::1,' "-;.., I;;C~! :~" ,,;, 'e" \' ~\q,",0 ~ -:)1 I /;-/.%" . \:;~~~. : Ii I \. ~ ;2" r i 'J I' !~' ":!~~ 'III I I (5 1 :i ~/ /,:I!~\'-. '~5~~ 'I:.I~' z .--;---.:: I "'Q /", ',~ ~ , rr-" 0 _.,."C ~'. L_ , '. '" . '1<1 , -, , " '. ~ ~j~ -'" '-~ i '. I, ~ ! I -! ~~' .. $-1 ;.,' ~~ I $ , I 'I' ::I: _. :~', ~ $' i-I ~; / \ ' ~ ti: !I, m '.' , "",,\<' "'Iil] Z 'I, _~~t--'--.---L, ,~,,~~ I ! :I.i iii' : ~ ,I' 1-,; $ ,: ' "II ! 0 'I" -" f,---,--$ ! ;" 'i"I'I[' ~ !> \----i . -i ,~, , ' , gj : :-__ ~~.." __ : i~~'~ ,2l 1-i :1'1 1 I~ v ~ i ~\ I -I '1 1 r::~ 1 ~~I I ,~.: II:;I .. J':\SI . i5 I \ ,"'I' ,~"'~; --.J' " "," .' ~' .. " '. ~"'.' '7 z j------'\------------. --I ~ '<>.2, I I II I , 't, ~ ;;; :, ~ ".", I I ',I I ,or . , . " 'I' • .' "-lit" .' j'~ \ il,l! I ~ : ,," '< ~,;I l)'-" :1,:, ,!I;IJ.::) , ~ I,~ l '\ " ii, r; I ',.:tE: L__ 'U ,\ I' () "/' i ',: ~E .. ",<~> / ~ 'b ~ ~' " 'II :,~~~~-----~ z ~ i,) if •... § if ,'V '\ ~ 'i Ii ". Ii. \ ~ r /~~. ~~ m t, , ,,-,c_.,·' " I;i Jy ~ ~• , ,c.. ' .' i'l 1 ",I Pc (' ~ '\ -, t .:' '-', "',---'<10------) " ;".,/)() - ,I c~ _I ~: .y~ :-1 , ". ____ "'~ ... ~ _"""",,~~~...I', -.--L.: =:-"",,, 1--"'-" ~ )Ie to, , -0-, ,)..~ ,,t" '--'0' -/ "'" 'I, I' '." O{< ----"'(i,t::. ~, ~, "'h ('-: 3~j~· \,;-r, ~ "(. --"Sl: I ~~~~~ '" e, I D '" : !'F: ;:J ~ ~:o':;Gl.~~'E m Q 5 r ~ \}t,).. "6~~" .;-~ :: ~~~~8~~ G; 9'~ ~ ~ ~ £~,~ ,i; 'X'<o"cs nn m :> ~~~ j!;;;'~ '({) !~llg ~~~ ~ .,'1" m §~~ ~ ~" " Ii; ~ , , > m "" , , " ",T-,_ ?j..,l:: ~ o! l,: r ~,,~ !! mm;; ! ~; " ; ~ ~C::::l,:!·8~ U) 5 ~ 0 '" ~ ~g" ~,.., ~ "f Z ~ g ~I~~ i~ ~ ~ .' ~ n z"~9 ~t 1 ~ g ~ g~$§ ~, ~ ~ . , ,,' " 'I ' . ~~~~l~8~, ~ S : iilHl i ~ ~f;~~~~ ~ ~ " :>: Ii ~ -~ ;;; " :; g § i ~ 1 , I" 3':fC)e$ ... ORANGE GROVE COTTAGES ,,,,,,,.,,m<lvil,<Qm ~-~ TOPOGRAPHY MAP WASIRNGmN ;;."':...~"":""" ~~ " I !' " " 0 g n ~ ~ " " m z :.. " " , , " , ~ ==a::=:,.il =-~ ;:l , ~ w " ill 0 Z < rr z " N ~ iil z 3 0 r " z 0 F u ill W ~ ~ z ~ ~ c 0 " ill i ~ ~ i: ; S o " o w i N01N3~ _,0 dn S38V~~O~3A08838NV80 l.N3V\1dOi3A30 O!::l'V'V\lAVr ~i ri ~I <, ! a'i h , 0 ~r rr' < Z " 1 , ~j ~~ N01~NIIS'(MS:liON 'i' 511'0'130 NVld 3d¥::lSGNVl M\fNI~n]t1d~o~'1]~.J())JJ: S301i.L100 31\01::10 30N'lfI::lO .LN3V\1d013/\30 81::1V'V'IIAV'r !!I, ~~ ;, 'I" ~ . , ts~ < ~~ 1 'I c- o; "J w ~~h 0 ~~ ~* "j ,!l 0 !, ,., z ~ ~~, ;~~~ " < c-w ~ , 'r:-' ~!~ l 1 f=i'* z'" i: :S':~ ~; "' ttl; 0' 1 f-I; I wi; i~ i :Ji ' I §'i 't~~ i I! "''''~ .' 0 ~"-; ,-Ii, i I'~ w 0 M :,~ ~ ~ c-w 0 ~, 0 z l! e z ii ~ 'I " , m , ~ oc I W I ~ 1 ~ " ; I , , "' ~~ ~ ,g~ ~~~{;~ ~ ~~ 1 I, , j, ,;, 1 , r~~~1 ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ r' , p , , ! t~ ~~~ < ! i ,~ w 1\.1 ~ , t ~8n~' ~ n~~ U!, ; ~q":p I ~: L ~ o ~ F, b li~P~ ~~ ~ ~§! f c f,'1r ~ ~0 ~ :1 ; , 0'1 , j, Vii! " ,(! w ' I 9:/' ~~ ~ :~ oc' ~1 i cr" II) I 1 4~~~~ ! il' f2i ,! <f, ~ I -'0 Zi ~ I {1~~Q 1 ~ .~ ~ xl 11 , ~' ~ i 1 ,,~~~~ , ! L! ~i , <, l ! ' ~:i • !l " ~' , • ~ • ~~~~j~ c I; ! ": j ~,. i , I i HI w, 0' 1 , w ~~ ! ",I 0 ~~ (+)~ I I ~ ~I 0 ,,, f-' -" l'll r,-· ' " ,~§[' i " • Z", J '-,f c; '--' (t. 0 ~ ! 13 ' 0' ~ ; ~i~ "''1;;1 > '" ! 0 1 .) I _t:~ (I)! ,. ~ A PORTION OF THE N E_ 1/4 OF THE N.W. 1/4, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 5 E .. W_M T ''', z--" '~::f"" ~~-.- ----,) '1 'l_Q) 1, fi" I I ;n~ U' ) T -<"\ II l~ !!: ~! - -\~ R __ " '" 't( : I l c-I I . I r" q I ___ _ ; L::; I , , I I '.' ,. "'"." .. ,., ""AA'" I : i "'n ~" ,i;' " I ' ,.' ~'. ! '." •. . l '. "';,t",' ,.. ",,,, ;,~~;,:~, r , ~R' '. ,I,. "'. ."1'., 't\,,, ""' •• ! "I ! I: '1J-i".'~O·~~··8!:J~gF~, 'T. I · "i~·;'·~"."[O~."RAU~J~C.'.·~' ... ' .. 'tl:l~ ! I IIT1'.AeT tit", I """,," , l 1 i IP"""W"~ ". ,.."" I I 0 11 i i_- I ~ I l I I I' n" e" Ii,'!! .... L: ~ .. ~,~-, :::i "_",:: !I~ P-1-'" .'~ I 1::,,'\':;:;·..,.. ~,-~ -c "" ",",""""0-. 8-""',<; 1 ~~--'-""';'-,("'--'-:;>":; -I ~, ~ Db~:. ;ED , .. -:-I ! '~'"I . 1 '" OJ!' in " 1 "',," l'lJTO'" I' I~i LL ;:;,~'~" TREE INVENTQBY _MAE n SCALE-1" 10' VICINI rv MAP -i-.or--o-S'::.OLI. ''''''i . I f '-:;;:-'.--,~' ~. "", '-;". :~1[:) \ ...... ' ". ~' "'''''~=T ~~:~;i%1' L;~ ;l~ .~! ~ Ij ". -.. Ii' II. ' , ~ ~~ . , ~~ rt -~~ g H ~j -~ m ~ r ~ H u ud W' (9 < e-« z f- w f- :> Oz Q. 0 O~ ~ -' W W" > >0 W O~ 0 () CC" ~ (9i;J := :> >-W « (9 , z « , CC , 0' t X.'""""_ ~~-:;;: - ~- L-3 3 3 ,'''''' Orange Grove -House Elevations Jaymarc Development Laurence Qamar, Town Planning Lots 1-5 -South Fronts Lots 21-25 -North Fronts Orange Grove -House Elevations Jaymarc Development Laurence Qamar, Town Planning Section Looking West Through Courtyard Lot 7-11 West Fronts Orange Grove -House Elevations Jaymarc Development Laurence Qamar, Town Planning Lots 13 and 20 North Sides Lots 12-16 West Fronts CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: August 8, 2013 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy M Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. i Project Name" " Orange Grove Cottages PUD LUA (file) Number: LUA-08-139, ECF, CU-H, PPUD CrOSS-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Vanessa Dolbee Acceptance Date: December 2, 2008 Applicant: Marc Rousso Owner: J&M Land Development Contact: Craig Krueger PID Number: 1523059035; 1523059193 ERC Decision Date: January 26, 2009 ERC Appeal Date: February 13, 2009 Administrative Denial: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: I I I I : , , i , ; , r • , Project Description: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Planned Urban Development (PUD) i approval, Environmental Review and a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit for stand alone I residential in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone. I Location: 330 Bremerton Avenue NE , i Comments: Final Notice Sent: July 25, 2012, 6th months from date of letter project will be void in , i no action. ~<JS-~\) ! i