Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJ_Rezone_Modification_20170425_v1SECTION 8 REZONE, VARIANCE, MODIFICATION OR CONDITIONAL USE JUSTIFICATION One variance from project requirements is requested. The current City of Renton parking requirement is for all parking stalls (270) to be located within the building’s structure. This proposal includes 229 parking stalls within the building envelope. The remainder parking requirement (41 stalls) will be met with 29 surface stalls adjacent to the south building entrance and 12 surface stalls adjacent to the building’s north entrance. In accordance with City of Renton requirements, RMC Section 4.9.250 D (2) a – f, Modification Procedures, the Applicant addresses Decision Criteria below. 2. Decision Criteria: Whenever there are practical difficulties involved in carrying out the provisions of this Title, the Department Administrator may grant modifications for individual cases provided he/she shall first find that a specific reason makes the strict letter of this Code impractical, that the intent and purpose of the governing land use designation of the Comprehensive Plan is met and that the modification is in conformity with the intent and purpose of this Code, and that such modification: a. Substantially implements the policy direction of the policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and the Community Design Element and the proposed modification is the minimum adjustment necessary to implement these policies and objectives; Applicant’s Response - The majority of the parking follows the City’s land use goals by providing parking within the building. The remaining parking meets the goals of the comprehensive plan by providing parking at the side or rear of the building. No parking is located between the building and the street. The proposed alternate parking configuration meets the goals of the Comprehensive plan by developing underutilized areas and by creating more efficient parking. The existing commercial buildings currently use these underutilized surface lots to meet their parking requirements. By allowing the residential project to share these surface lots will promote a commercial / residential mixed use district. The location of this surface parking better serves residential visitors and patrons of the commercial spaces. b. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; Applicant’s Response - The proposed alternate parking configuration will be safe and use best design practices available to protect the environment. The proposed mixed use residential project will use the existing surface parking to fulfill the parking requirements. No new surface parking lots are being created in order to meet the project’s parking requirements. c. Will not be injurious to other property(ies) in the vicinity; Applicant’s Response – The proposed parking will not be injurious to the neighboring properties. Landscaping and exterior walkways will be developed to encourage safer pedestrian circulation and efficient parking. d. Conforms to the intent and purpose of the Code; Applicant’s Response – 229 of the required 286 parking stalls are located within the building. The remaining 30 stalls are located next to the side and rear of the building. 27 stalls are located in an off-site lot that’s within the 500’ distance allowed for a residential use. e. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and Applicant’s Response – The proposed parking located around the exterior of the building is conveniently located for the apartment tenants and their visitors. The project will encourage shared parking of the existing surface lots. f. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. Applicant’s Response – There are no adverse impacts to the neighboring properties. All of the neighboring properties have more parking than is required by the city and will meet their demand.