HomeMy WebLinkAboutContractAGREEMENT FOR SPRINGBROOK CREEK ACTION PLAN HABITAT
RESTORATION
THIS AGREEMENT, dated for reference purposes only as May 30th, 2024, is by and between the
Herrera Environmental
Consultants, Inc.a Washington State Corporation. The City and the Consultant
this Agreement is effective as of the last date signed by both parties.
1. Scope of Work: Consultant agrees to provide planning and design services as specified in
Exhibit A, which is attached and incorporated herein and may hereinafter be referred to
Work
2. Changes in Scope of Work: The City, without invalidating this Agreement, may order
changes to the Workconsisting of additions, deletions or modifications.Any such changes
to the Work shall be ordered by the City in writing and the Compensation shall be
equitably adjusted consistent with the rates set forth in ExhibitCor as otherwise mutually
agreed by the Parties.
3. Time of Performance: Consultant shall commence performance of the Agreement
pursuant to the schedule(s) set forth in Exhibit B. All Work shall be performed by no later
than December 31, 2026.
4. Compensation:
A. Amount. Total compensation to Consultant for Work provided pursuant to this
Agreement shall not exceed $329,257, plus any applicable state and local sales taxes.
Compensation shall be paid based upon Work actually performed according to the
rate(s) or amounts specified in Exhibit C. The Consultant agrees that any hourly or flat
rate charged by it for its Work shall remain locked at the negotiated rate(s) unless
otherwise agreed to in writing or provided in Exhibit C. Except as specifically provided
herein, the Consultant shall be solely responsible for payment of any taxes imposed
as a result of the performance and payment of this Agreement.
B. Method of Payment. On a monthly or no less than quarterly basis during any quarter
in which Workisperformed, the Consultant shall submit a voucher or invoice in aform
specified by the City, including a description of what Work has been performed, the
name of the personnel performing such Work, and any hourly labor charge rate for
CAG-24-138
PAGE 2 OF 10
such personnel. The Consultant shall also submit a final bill upon completion of all
Work. Payment shall be made by the City for Work performed within thirty (30)
calendar days after receipt and approval by the appropriate City representative of the
voucher or invoice. If the does not meet the requirements
of this Agreement, the Consultant will correct or modify its performance to comply
with the Agreement. The City may withhold payment for work that does not meet the
requirements of this Agreement.
C. Effect of Payment. Payment for any part of the Work shall not constitute a waiver by
the City of any remedies it may have against the Consultant for failure of the
Consultant to perform the Work or for any breach of this Agreement by the
Consultant.
D. Non-Appropriation of Funds. If sufficient funds are not appropriated or allocated for
payment under this Agreement for any future fiscal period, the City shall not be
obligated to make payments for Work or amounts incurred after the end of the
current fiscal period, and this Agreement will terminate upon the completion of all
remaining Work for which funds are allocated. No penalty or expense shall accrue to
the City in the event this provision applies.
5. Termination:
A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without
cause by giving ten(10) calendar
of such termination or suspension, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies,
worksheets, models and reports, or other material prepared by the Consultant
pursuant to this Agreement shall be submitted to the City, if any are required as part
of the Work.
B. In the event this Agreement is terminated by the City, the Consultant shall be entitled
to payment for all hours worked to the effective date of termination, less all payments
previously made. If the Agreement is terminated by the City after partial performance
of Work for which the agreed compensation is a fixed fee, the City shall pay the
Consultant an equitable share of the fixed fee. This provision shall not prevent the
City from seeking any legal remedies it may have for the violation or nonperformance
of any of the provisions of this Agreement and such charges due to the City shall be
deducted from the final payment due the Consultant. No payment shall be made by
the City for any expenses incurred or work done following the effective date of
termination unless authorized in advance in writing by the City.
6. Warranties And Right To Use Work Product: Consultant represents and warrants that
Consultant will perform all Work identified in this Agreement in a professional and
workmanlike manner and in accordance with all reasonable and professional standards
PAGE 3 OF 10
and laws. Compliance with professional standards includes, as applicable, performing the
Work in compliance with applicable City standards or guidelines (e.g. design criteria and
Standard Plans for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction). Professional engineers shall
certify engineering plans, specifications, plats, and reports, as applicable, pursuant to
RCW 18.43.070. Consultant further represents and warrants that all final work product
created for and delivered to the City pursuant to this Agreement shall be the original work
of the Consultant and free from any intellectual property encumbrance which would
restrict the City from using the work product. Consultant grants to the City a non-
exclusive, perpetual right and license to use, reproduce, distribute, adapt, modify, and
display all final work product produced pursuant to this Agreement.
adaptation, modification or use of the final work products other than for the purposes of
this Agreement shall be without liability to the Consultant. The provisions of this section
shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
7. Record Maintenance: The Consultant shall maintain accounts and records, which
properly reflect all direct and indirect costs expended and Work provided in the
performance of this Agreement and retain such records for as long as may be required by
applicable Washington State records retention laws, but in any event no less than six
years after the termination of this Agreement. The Consultant agrees to provide access
to and copies of any records related to this Agreement as required by the City to audit
expenditures and chargesand/or to comply with the Washington State Public Records Act
(Chapter 42.56 RCW). The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or
termination of this Agreement.
8. Public Records Compliance: To the full extent the City determines necessary to comply
with the Washington State Public Records Act, Consultant shall make a due diligent search
of all records in its possession or control relating to this Agreement and the Work,
including, but not limited to, e-mail, correspondence, notes, saved telephone messages,
recordings, photos, or drawings and provide them to the City for production. In the event
Consultant believes said records need to be protected from disclosure, it may, at
or litigation related to a Public Records Act request for which Consultant has responsive
records and for which Consultant has withheld records or information contained therein,
or not provided them to the City in a timely manner. Consultant shall produce for
distribution any and all records responsive to the Public Records Act request in a timely
manner, unless those records are protected by court order. The provisions of this section
shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
9. Independent Contractor Relationship:
A. The Consultant is retained by the Cityonly for the purposes and to the extent set forth
in this Agreement. The nature of the relationship between the Consultant and the City
PAGE 4 OF 10
during the period of the Work shall be that of an independent contractor, not
employee. The Consultant, not the City, shall have the power to control and direct the
details, manner or means of Work. Specifically, but not by means of limitation, the
Consultant shall have no obligation to work any particular hours or particular
schedule, unless otherwise indicated in the Scope of Work or where scheduling of
attendance or performance is mutually arranged due to the nature of the Work.
Consultant shall retain the right to designate the means of performing the Work
covered by this agreement, and the Consultant shall be entitled to employ other
workers at such compensation and such other conditions as it may deem proper,
provided, however, that any contract so made by the Consultant is to be paid by it
alone, and that employing such workers, it is acting individually and not as an agent
for the City.
B. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or otherwise deducting federal
income tax or Social Security or contributing to the State Industrial Insurance
Program, or otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to Consultant
or any employee of the Consultant.
C. If the Consultant is a sole proprietorship or if this Agreement is with an individual, the
Consultant agrees to notify the City and complete any required form if the Consultant
retired under a State of Washington retirement system and agrees to indemnify any
10. Hold Harmless: The Consultant agrees to release, indemnify, defend, and hold harmless
the City, elected officials, employees, officers, representatives, and volunteers from any
and all claims, demands, actions, suits, causes of action, arbitrations, mediations,
proceedings, judgments, awards, injuries, damages, liabilities, losses, fines, fees,
penalties,
by any and all persons or entities, arising from, resulting from, or related to the negligent
acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant in its performance of this Agreement or a
breach of this Agreement by Consultant, except for that portion of the claims caused by
Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this agreement is subject to RCW
4.24.115, (Validity of agreement to indemnify against liability for negligence relative to
construction, alteration, improvement, etc., of structure or improvement attached to real
or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the
PAGE 5 OF 10
It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided in
Insurance Act, RCW Title 51, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. The Parties
have mutually negotiated and agreed to this waiver. The provisions of this section shall
survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
11. Gifts and Conflicts:
employees from soliciting, accepting, or receiving any gift, gratuity or favor from any
person, firm or corporation involved in a contract or transaction. To ensure compliance
Code of Ethics and state law, the Consultant shall not give a gift of any kind
to City employees or officials. Consultant also confirms that Consultant does not have a
business interest or a close family relationship with any City officer or employee who was,
is, or will be involved in selecting the Consultant, negotiating or administering this
Work.
12. City of Renton Business License: Unless exempted by the Renton Municipal Code,
Consultant shall obtain a City of Renton Business License prior to performing any Work
and maintain the business license in good standing throughout the term of this
agreement with the City.
Information regarding acquiring a city business license can be found at:
https://www.rentonwa.gov/Tax
Information regarding State business licensing requirements can be found at:
https://dor.wa.gov/doing-business/register-my-business
13. Insurance: Consultant shall secure and maintain:
A. Commercial general liability insurance in the minimum amounts of $1,000,000 for
each occurrence/$2,000,000 aggregate for the Term of this Agreement.
B. In the event that Work delivered pursuant to this Agreement either directly or
indirectly involve or require Professional Services, Professional Liability, Errors and
Omissions coverage shall be provided with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per
occurrence. "Professional Services", for the purpose of this section, shall mean any
Work provided by a licensed professional or Work that requires a professional
standard of care.
C.
State of Washington, shall also be secured.
D. Commercial Automobile Liability for owned, leased, hired or non-owned, leased, hired
or non-owned, with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence combined single
PAGE 6 OF 10
behalf of the City, beyond normal commutes.
E. Consultant shall name the City as an Additional Insured on its commercial general
liability policy on a non-
not be a source for payment of any Consultant liability, nor shall the maintenance of
any insurance required by this Agreement be construed to limit the liability of
recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity.
F.
proper endorsements, shall be delivered to the City before performing the Work.
G. Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of any policy cancellation, within
two (2) business days of their receipt of such notice.
14. Delays: Consultant is not responsible for delays caused by factors beyond the
controloccur, the City agrees the Consultant is not responsible for damages, nor shall the
Consultant be deemed to be in default of the Agreement.
15. Successors and Assigns: Neither the City nor the Consultant shall assign, transfer or
encumber any rights, duties or interests accruing from this Agreement without the
written consent of the other.
16. Notices: Any notice required under this Agreement will be in writing, addressed to the
appropriate party at the address which appears below (as modified in writing from time
to time by such party), and given personally, by registered or certified mail, return receipt
requested, by facsimile or by nationally recognized overnight courier service. Time period
for notices shall be deemed to have commenced upon the date of receipt, EXCEPT
facsimile delivery will be deemed to have commenced on the first business day following
transmission. Email and telephone may be used for purposes of administering the
Agreement, but should not be used to give any formal notice required by the Agreement.
CITY OF RENTON
Chester Bennett
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
Phone: (425) 430-7205
cbennett@rentonwa.gov
CONSULTANT
Betsy Lyons
2200 Sixth Ave, Suite 100
Seattle, WA 98121
Phone: (206) 708-3064
blyons@herrerainc.com
PAGE 7 OF 10
17. Discrimination Prohibited: Except to the extent permitted by a bona fide occupational
qualification, the Consultant agrees as follows:
A.
with regard to the Work performed or to be performed under this Agreement, shall
not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, nationality, creed, marital
status, sexual orientation or preference, age (except minimum age and retirement
provisions), honorably discharged veteran or military status, or the presence of any
sensory, mental or physical handicap, unless based upon a bona fide occupational
qualification in relationship to hiring and employment, in employment or application
for employment, the administration of the delivery of Work or any other benefits
under this Agreement, or procurement of materials or supplies.
B. The Consultant will take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and
that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, creed,
color, national origin, sex, age, sexual orientation, physical, sensory or mental
handicaps, or marital status. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the
following employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment
advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and
selection for training.
C.-discrimination
provisions, the City shall have the right, at its option, to cancel the Agreement in
whole or in part.
D. The Consultant is responsible to be aware of and in compliance with all federal, state
and local laws and regulations that may affect the satisfactory completion of the
project, which includes but is not limited to fair labor laws, worker's compensation,
and Title VI of the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, and will comply with City of Renton
Council Resolution Number 4085.
18. Miscellaneous:The parties hereby acknowledge:
A. The City is not responsible to train or provide training for Consultant.
B. Consultant will not be reimbursed for job related expenses except to the extent
specifically agreed within the attached exhibits.
C. Consultant shall furnish all tools and/or materials necessary to perform the Work
except to the extent specifically agreed within the attached exhibits.
D. In the event special training, licensing, or certification is required for Consultant to
provide Work he/she will acquire or maintain such at his/her own expense and, if
PAGE 8 OF 10
Consultant employs, sub-contracts, or otherwise assigns the responsibility to perform
the Work, said employee/sub-contractor/assignee will acquire and or maintain such
training, licensing, or certification.
E. This is a non-exclusive agreement and Consultant is free to provide his/her Work to
other entities, so long as there is no interruption or interference with the provision of
Work called for in this Agreement.
F. Consultant is responsible for his/her own insurance, including, but not limited to
health insurance.
G.
that for any persons employed by the Consultant.
19. Other Provisions:
A. Approval Authority. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of the City
and Consultant represents and warrants that such individuals are duly authorized to
execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of the City or Consultant.
B. General Administration and Management.project manager is Chester
Bennett. In providing Work
manager or his/her designee.
C. Amendment and Modification. This Agreement may be amended only by an
instrument in writing, duly executed by both Parties.
D. Conflicts. In the event of any inconsistencies between Consultant proposals and this
Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. Any exhibits/attachments to
this Agreement are incorporated by reference only to the extent of the purpose for
which they are referenced within this Agreement. To the extent a Consultant
prepared exhibit conflicts with the terms in the body of this Agreement or contains
terms that are extraneous to the purpose for which it is referenced, the terms in the
body of this Agreement shall prevail and the extraneous terms shall not be
incorporated herein.
E. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be made in and shall be governed by and
interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington and the City of
Work in
accordance with all applicable federal, state, county and city laws, codes and
ordinances.
F. Joint Drafting Effort. This Agreement shall be considered for all purposes as prepared
by the joint efforts of the Parties and shall not be construed against one party or the
PAGE 9 OF 10
other as a result of the preparation, substitution, submission or other event of
negotiation, drafting or execution.
G. Jurisdiction and Venue. Any lawsuit or legal action brought by any party to enforce or
interpret this Agreement or any of its terms or covenants shall be brought in the King
County Superior Court for the State of Washington at the Maleng Regional Justice
Center in Kent, King County, Washington, or its replacement or successor. Consultant
hereby expressly consents to the personal and exclusive jurisdiction and venue of
such court even if Consultant is a foreign corporation not registered with the State of
Washington.
H. Severability.
part of this Agreement is illegal or unenforceable shall not cancel or invalidate the
remainder of this Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect.
I. Sole and Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the
Parties and any representations or understandings, whether oral or written, not
incorporated are excluded.
J. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and each and all of
its provisions in which performance is a factor. Adherence to completion dates set
forth in the description of the Work
this Agreement.
K. Third-Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to, nor shall be
construed to give any rights or benefits in the Agreement to anyone other than the
Parties, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will
be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the Parties and no one else.
L. Binding Effect. The Parties each bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns,
and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement, and to the partners,
successors, assigns, and legal representatives of such other party with respect to all
covenants of the Agreement.
M. Waivers.
failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be a waiver and shall not
prevent either the City or Consultant from enforcing that provision or any other
provision of this Agreement in the future. Waiver of breach of any provision of this
Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any prior or subsequent breach
unless it is expressly waived in writing.
PAGE 10 OF 10
N. Counterparts. The Parties may execute this Agreement in any number of
counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, and all of which will together
constitute this one Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have voluntarily entered into this Agreement as of the date
last signed by the Parties below.
CITY OF RENTON
By:_____________________________
CONSULTANT
By:____________________________
Armondo Pavone
Mayor, City of Renton Herrera Environmental Consultants
_____________________________
Date
_____________________________
Date
Attest
_____________________________
Jason A. Seth
City Clerk
Approved as to Legal Form
By: __________________________
Shane Moloney
City Attorney
Contract Template Updated 5/21/2021
June 12, 20247/22/2024
Approved by Cheryl Beyer via email 6/7/2024
On March 29, 2024, the City of Renton (City) authorized Herrera Environmental Consultants (Herrera) to
prepare a scope of work and cost estimate to complete a restoration action plan for Lower Springbrook
Creek for the City. This project is the first phase of a multiphase project identified as project LG-19 on the
Salmon Recovery Plan Update for the Lower Green River sub-watershed.
Herrera will evaluate and characterize existing conditions along approximately 15,600 feet (RM 2.9 to 0.0)
of Springbrook Creek, develop restoration concepts to improve the habitat and ecological function of
Springbrook Creek, and complete an Action Plan Report that identifies phased restoration project
opportunities. the habitat and ecological function of
Springbrook Creek through riparian plantings, large woody debris, and pool construction. Specific
objectives of the Action Plan include assessing existing conditions, analyzing alternative solutions, and
dividing the project into more manageable phases or site-specific projects. This scope of work includes a
discussion of the activities, assumptions, deliverables, and a schedule associated with the following
project tasks:
.......................................................................................................................
................................................................................................
.......................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
preparing invoices and progress reports, coordination with the designated City point of contact, Chester
Bennett, as well as coordination of work efforts with the
have phone and email contact with the City and subconsultants on an as-needed basis and is responsible
for ensuring QA/QC of all deliverables in accordance with Herrera standard policies and processes.
, and then by an assigned
Client Satisfaction Reviewer
Directors. Following these QA/QC steps, deliverables are reviewed by technical editing and word
processing staff before being finalized and submitted to the Client and archived.
This task includes a virtual project team kickoff meeting with the City, an onsite meeting with the City,
maintenance of the project schedule, and coordination on key issues to be addressed in the existing
conditions characterization, restoration concept development, and Action Plan development. During the
initial project team kickoff meeting priority areas to visit during the onsite field tour will be identified.
Herrera will support the City in coordination with key stakeholders (Stakeholders) through attendance at
virtual and onsite meetings, input on meeting agendas, and evaluation of data and feedback received.
Identified project Stakeholders include Mid Sound Fisheries Enhancement Group (riparian revegetation),
funding), King County Drainage District #1 (flood control), and King County Black River Pump Station
Project Team (flood control and fish passage).
Virtual kickoff meeting with the City (up to 2 hours in duration) and attended by up to 6 Herrera
team members. The kickoff meeting will focus on project goals and objectives as well available
information.
Herrera to provide link to SharePoint site for exchange of project material.
City is responsible for securing access permissions, scheduling meeting venues, dates and time,
and coordinating with Stakeholders on their availability for meetings and site visits.
Unless otherwise noted, all deliverables including meeting notes will have a single set of revisions
and 2-week turnaround period for comments.
Agenda and notes for a project kickoff meeting with City staff.
Herrera will evaluate existing conditions of the project site through a desktop review of available
information including remote-sensing and other data such as the following:
instream, riparian and floodplain information on the creek and its banks
vegetation growth (native and non-native),
riparian buffer extents,
levees,
water quality,
erosion and sedimentation area geomorphic and physical habitat conditions,
culverts,
outfalls,
bridges and any directly connected wetlands.
Herrera will submit formal data requests to the City Project Manager via email for data that is not readily
available through public data sources or City GIS. Herrera will present key findings to the City and
Stakeholders in a virtual meeting to solicit feedback on data gaps, other potential data sources, and
potential locations for additional rapid field reconnaissance (Task 2.2). After the virtual meeting, Herrera
will meet onsite with the City and Stakeholders to discuss known problems and restoration needs and
visit areas of interest and/or sites where rapid field reconnaissance is proposed.
Relevant known reports and data sources that will be reviewed include:
City of Renton:
GIS database
Receiving Water A
Previous water quality reports
King County:
iMap GIS data
Hydraulic and hydrologic modeling files, results, and reports for Springbrook Creek (from the
Lower Green FIS and recent work for the Black River Pump Station [BRPS] improvements
project)
Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife:
Priority Habitat and Species database
Fish distribution and barrier mapping
WRIA 9:
Limiting Factors Report Springbrook Creek Sub-basin
Salmon Habitat Plan Update
WRIA 9 Fish Inventory Data
King County Drainage District 1
Previous water quality reports
Previous documentation of Springbrook Creek habitat existing conditions
Puget Sound Keepers Alliance:
Website (Lost Urban Creeks Project)
Water quality monitoring reports and data
WSDOT:
Mitigation project material
US Fish & Wildlife Service:
National Wetlands Inventory
Herrera will review this information to generate a preliminary understanding of instream, riparian and
floodplain habitat conditions. Historical habitat characteristics will also be referenced based on available
information. After reviewing this information, Herrera will identify potentially important areas (wetlands,
historic side channels, stands of native vegetation, disconnected floodplain areas) that could be
reconnected and should be visited during a targeted field evaluation.
Herrera will also use the King County Water Quality Benefits Evaluation (WQBE) Toolkit to inform the
existing water quality conditions characterization and habitat assessment. The WQBE Toolkit was
developed by a group of entities (including Herrera) for the purpose of planning, and staff at King
County offer no-charge assistance to local jurisdictions to use and interpret the output. The Toolkit
combines a series of existing models to identify pollution hotspots (Watershed model) and pollution
prevention options (SUSTAIN model), and the output includes estimated costs of best management
practices (BMPs) (per the Toolkit) needed to address the level of habitat
improvements desired and the associated water quality. The model will be especially useful for this effort
since it includes optimization steps to explicitly model small basins, such as lower Springbrook Creek.
Scope elements for using the WQBE Toolkit include meetings with staff from the City, King County, and
Herrera; review of input parameters and assumptions for the Toolkit: and review and interpretation of the
Toolkit output (provided by King County) regarding potential benefit to water quality conditions per
habitat improvement targets.
Desktop review limited to publicly accessible, and web-based data sources.
City to provide Herrera with copies of available information requested via email or upload to
Herrera data sharing site.
City to submit data requests to Stakeholders at the start of the tasks and provide requested
information via email or upload to Herrera data sharing site).
Herrera to present summary of desktop review to Client and Stakeholders in an up to 1-hour
virtual meeting with up to five Herrera staff present. Herrera will provide meeting notes
documenting major comments and next steps (email or Microsoft Word format). Herrera will
complete a single round of revision to meeting notes.
City will provide site access permission and coordinate with key Stakeholders as needed to
schedule the site visit.
Herrera to attend site visit (up to 4 hours in duration plus travel time and with up to five Herrera
staff (project manager, hydraulic engineer, geomorphologist, ecologist, and landscape designer).
Data request (Microsoft Excel table) to City of Renton including data requests from external
agencies and organizations.
Available data log (Microsoft Excel) summarizing available data provided by the City and/or other
project partners.
PowerPoint presentation, tables, and figures as needed to summarize the existing conditions
desktop review.
Draft and final table (Microsoft Excel or Word) and PDF maps identifying locations for proposed
rapid field reconnaissance (Task 2.2).
Following the desktop analysis and identification of locations for additional targeted field reconnaissance,
Herrera will conduct a rapid field reconnaissance of the selected sites to assess existing geomorphic and
habitat conditions of the stream and riparian corridor. The field effort will focus on verifying information
important for identifying and evaluating potential restoration concepts, acknowledging that formal
delineations of wetlands, vegetated land cover, and ordinary high water (OHW) would be completed at
later design stages of the project once a more precise restoration project area and potential project
impact area is defined.
Herrera will select representative channel, riparian, and floodplain locations to assess existing channel
morphologic conditions, channel dimensions, bank conditions, significant areas of native vegetation,
erosion or deposition, as well as in-channel and off-channel riparian habitat conditions. Drone surveys
may be completed to evaluate existing conditions in areas that are inaccessible due to steep channels,
property ownership, dense vegetation, or other unsafe conditions.
The field reconnaissance will include a coarse characterization of instream, riparian, and floodplain
conditions. The reconnaissance will also note opportunities and constraints for future restoration concept
development given local land use and land cover conditions (e.g., utility crossings). The field
reconnaissance will also include a general characterization of vegetation communities within areas of
interest, confirmation of mapped wildlife habitats (including mapped and potentially unmapped beaver
dam locations), and investigation of potential wetland areas. Wetland investigation will be through
observation of plants, review of mapped soils, and other qualitative observations.
City staff will facilitate site access permissions for field reconnaissance.
Up to 10 priority sites will be selected for rapid field reconnaissance. Field reconnaissance is
assumed to require three 8-hour days plus travel time for four Herrera staff (hydraulic engineer,
geomorphologist, ecologist, and landscape architect).
Land survey is not included in this task but can be authorized as needed through request for
supplemental survey funding (Task 5).
Herrera will bring a GPS unit with sub-meter accuracy (<30 cm HRMS) to collect georeferenced
data in the field as needed. GPS data will be collected in a global coordinate system and
projected to s geodetic datum and horizontal coordinate system standards.
City will be able to coordinate all access permissions in advance of the field reconnaissance.
Official surveys of significant and hazard trees will not be completed as part of this fieldwork.
Critical areas reviewed will include wetlands, shorelines, and streams, but not geological hazards,
frequently flooded areas, or aquifer recharge areas.
Wetland and ordinary high water mark will not be formally delineated. Where pertinent to inform
habitat conditions or habitat utilization, ordinary high water mark will be estimated based on
available model data and results discussed in Task 2.3.
Drone flights and data capture will occur at up to three sites. This will include placement and GPS
mapping of visual ground control points (to improve data product accuracy), collection of air
photos in support of graphic rendering of future conditions, collection of air photos in support of
photogrammetric modeling (for orthophoto, DEM, and 3D surface reconstruction), and video
capture (to aid in project communication).
No in-water or over-water work will occur as part of the field reconnaissance.
Field reconnaissance findings and recommendations will be incorporated into the Existing
Conditions Memorandum described in Task 2.4 below.
Drone-derived data products. These will include aerial photographs and videos of the priority
sites and may also include ortho-corrected photo mosaics (for high-resolution GIS and CAD
base imagery), digital terrain models, graphic renderings of future site conditions (to support
communication of the proposed action plan), and other products as agreed upon between the
City and project team.
In tandem with the field analysis and desktop review of existing data, Herrera will conduct an existing
conditions hydraulic analysis of the project reach. The existing conditions model will be important to use
as a baseline for comparing to proposed alternative conditions which will facilitate quantification of
habitat improvements and ensuring no off-site impacts. To promote efficiency and consistency with other
related analyses in the same project corridor, Herrera will use the same HEC-RAS 2D model developed
for the Black River Pump Station (BRPS) Project including the same hydrologic flow inputs (which were
determined using HSPF modeling). Herrera might make slight modifications to the BRPS model in the
vicinity of potential proposed alternatives to add additional definition (e.g., refinements of the
Springbrook Creek geometry or roughness estimates) based on the findings from the rapid field
reconnaissance).
Herrera will work with the project team to determine whether and how to incorporate the anticipated
BRPS improvements into the existing conditions model runs. Herrera may also evaluate existing
conditions for different flow rates than were simulated in the BRPS model, especially if determined
important by the project team for assessing fish habitat connectivity, accessibility, and type. Altogether,
Herrera will evaluate up to six existing conditions model simulations for different flow recurrence intervals
determined to represent hydraulic conditions relevant to evaluations of habitat in addition to potential
hydraulic and geomorphic hazard and risk.
King County will provide the existing model developed for the Black River Pump Station Project.
Herrera will evaluate up to six existing conditions model simulations (which may or may not
include the proposed BRPS improvements as determined by the Project Team) for different flow
recurrence intervals (likely including the average annual flow, 2-year, 100-year, another flow rate if
requested by the City, and two flow conditions important for assessing fish habitat connectivity,
accessibility, and type).
If estimation of new flow rates for evaluating fish passage or habitat is determined to be
necessary, all calculations will be completed consistent with guidance documents published by
the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW 2019).
Screenshots of preliminary results to be shared during meetings for discussion.
Final graphics to be included in the Existing Conditions Characterization Memorandum.
This task involves compiling the existing conditions documented and observations from Tasks 2.1 through
2.3 into a single, cohesive Existing Conditions Characterization Technical Memorandum. This
memorandum will summarize the desktop review and present findings from the rapid field
reconnaissance and will document existing and baseline hydrologic and hydraulic (H/H) geomorphic, and
ecological conditions. It will also include high-level recommendations for the next steps proceeding with
the alternatives analysis to be developed in Task 3.
Technical memorandum is estimated to be not more than 25 pages plus appendices and
including up to 10 figures to document the results.
Herrera will address up to one round of consolidated comments from the City and Stakeholders
on the technical memorandum.
If drone surveys are used for preliminary site characterization, high-resolution orthophoto
mosaics and other drone-derived data products (e.g., elevation models) will be used to create
supporting figures depicting existing site conditions. The reprojection error, ground control point
accuracy, ground resolution, and other relevant attributes will be reported for each modeled site.
Draft and Final Existing Conditions Technical Memo (Microsoft Word and PDF format).
This task includes developing and evaluating alternatives for restoring ecological conditions along the
Springbrook Creek project corridor. This task will begin with the identification of distinct restoration areas
and sites (3.1a) to be followed by the development of high level alternatives for each area (3.1b). These
will then be prioritized with preferred alternatives (3.2) presented to the City and then advanced for
further design development and cost estimates (3.3).
Herrera will draw upon the findings in previous tasks to support development of planning level
alternative solutions analysis to identified habitat and water quality problems. Recommended habitat
improvements are likely to include:
Restoration alternatives will be included in the concept sheets and will focus on improvements to habitat,
riparian vegetation, channel stability, floodplain reconnection and refuge for salmonids. Potential
improvements to water quality will also be identified based on the restoration alternatives identified.
Building on the existing conditions characterization and salmon habitat limiting factors, Herrera will
identify needed riparian improvements to support the multi-phase project goals and that are expected to
be achieved through the Action Plan. Herrera will develop a series of Restoration Alternative Concept
Sheets (Concept Sheets) for the most promising sites along the 2.9-mile stretch of Springbrook Creek
within the project area. The Concept Sheets will summarize the existing conditions, problems, and
opportunities at each site that could be addressed through restoration. The concept sheets will be
reviewed with the City in a virtual workshop and then revised based on City feedback.
Concept sheets will include:
Restoration alternatives included in the concept sheets will focus on improvements to instream, riparian,
and floodplain habitat areas. Potential water quality improvements will also be summarized based on the
alternatives identified for recommended habitat improvements for this project.
Recommended habitat improvements found within the concept sheets are likely to include:
Restoration design concepts and habitat improvements will be focused on the creek and riparian
corridor and do not include work on noncontiguous tributaries, upstream, or other locations in
the drainage basin.
The number of concept sheets per site or sub-reach may vary from one to several depending on
the complexity of the site.
Concept sheets will be focused primarily on City or publicly owned property but may include
some sites that are not publicly owned.
Herrera will submit Draft Restoration Alternative Concept Sheets to the City for a single round of
revisions prior to the stakeholder workshop.
Herrera will present the Concept Sheets to the City and Stakeholder through a single 2-hour
virtual workshop. Following a 2-week comment period, Herrera will provide revised Concept
Sheets.
Up to 10 draft and final concept sheets (PDF format).
Presentation material for stakeholder workshop (Microsoft PowerPoint).
Following refinement of restoration alternatives in Task 3.2, Herrera will develop draft evaluation criteria
and prioritize the restoration alternatives. A draft ranking of the alternatives would be presented to the
City and Stakeholders in a virtual workshop, the output of which would be a short list of alternative
concepts to be included in the Action Plan. The alternatives selected for the action plan will address the
priorities and objectives identified in previous tasks, the physical and ecological constraints of the project
site documented during the existing conditions characterization, and the concerns of the Stakeholders
identified during the workshop.
Restoration design concepts and habitat improvements will be focused on the creek and riparian
corridor and do not include work on noncontiguous tributaries, upstream, or other locations in
the drainage basin.
Herrera will obtain Stakeholder input on the concept sheets through a 2-hour virtual workshop
followed by 2-week comment period with a single round of revisions.
The output of the workshop will be identification of the preferred alternative for up to three sites.
Draft and final alternatives analysis memo including prioritization criteria and ranking (Microsoft
Word and PDF format).
Presentation material for prioritization workshop (Microsoft PowerPoint format).
Identification of the preferred alternatives to be included in the Action Plan.
Herrera will refine the preferred alternative concept at up to three sites and will develop associated
planning level conceptual restoration design drawings and conceptual construction cost estimates.
Herrera will present the results to the City for review and consideration in the Action Plan (Task 4).
Herrera will solicit Stakeholder input on the restoration design concepts through a single 1-hour
virtual meeting with the City and Stakeholders.
Stakeholder input will be documented in meeting minutes with a single round of written
comments. Restoration concepts and costs estimates will be developed at a planning level and
will not include detailed quantities or bid item estimates.
Planning level restoration concept drawing for three preferred alternatives (GIS or CAD figures)
Planning level cost estimates for three preferred alternatives.
Herrera will use the existing conditions model developed as part of Task 3.1 as a base to be refined for
simulation of proposed alternative concept project geometries and conditions. The alternative concept
modeling will run the same set of flows used in the existing conditions through each alternative. These
model runs will be used to estimate potential project benefits and impacts, such as changes to habitat
areas or types, and areas of potential increased or hydraulic and geomorphic hazard and risk.
Herrera will model up to three proposed hydraulic performance alternatives, for a total of 12
model simulations.
Model results will be presented in the Concept Summary Sheets
Hydraulic model files.
Final graphics to be included in the concept summary sheets.
Herrera will develop an Action Plan report that concisely documents and culminates the work performed
in previous tasks and synthesizes the various deliverables produced. The Action Plan report will
summarize the restoration concept development, identify phasing considerations, and dependencies on
other projects, needed property acquisitions or agreements, and propose a schedule for implementing
remaining design and permitting phases and associated grant applications.
The Action Plan will also include a high-level feasibility evaluation of the desired improvements to inform
planning for additional technical assessments (e.g., survey, geotechnical assessments, or biological
surveys). As the Action Plan is developed, Herrera will solicit feedback from stakeholders on restoration
concepts to include in the Action Plan to understand connections to other related projects and to inform
phasing alternatives. The report will define a recommended sequence of those actions, a discussion of
funding options and funding recommendations, and also discussion of interactions with stakeholders and
the public that will be needed as the City advances the recommendations in the plan.
Single round of Action Plan review by City and revisions by Herrera prior to distribution for
stakeholder input.
Single round of stakeholder review via a virtual meeting (up to 1-hour duration attended by two
Herrera staff), followed by a single round of revisions by Herrera.
Herrera will prepare a comment/response log to document how stakeholder feedback was
considered in the final Action Plan.
Comments on draft documents to be provided in writing via email or changes tracked in
Microsoft Word.
Draft Action Plan (Microsoft Word and PDF format).
Revised Action Plan #1 for stakeholder review (Microsoft Word and PDF format).
Comment response log (Microsoft Word or Excel)
Final Action Plan (Microsoft Word and PDF format).
Herrera will develop a digital, interactive ArcGIS Online StoryMap. This is a valuable tool for
communicating the proposed Action Plan to Stakeholders, as it allows users to both explore the project
sites through a curated, visually-rich project narrative, and to explore the project sites independently by
querying spatial layers. The StoryMap may include custom, interactive pop-up windows and/or charts,
multimedia elements (photo, video integration), narrative text, opportunities for direct user feedback, or
other dynamic elements that enhance stakeholder understanding of the proposed Action Plan.
This task may also include the development of visual renderings of project alternatives. This is another
valuable tool for communicating the Action Plan to Stakeholders.
to achieve the desired level of definition in the hydraulic model.
This task requires written authorization from the City Project Manager prior to being started.
City authorization to begin Task 5 work will be documented either via email or other written
correspondence from the City Project Manager.
The City shall retain ownership of the StoryMap after final deliverables of the scope are
completed. The City and Herrera will coordinate setup and / or transfer of StoryMap files and
ownership as needed during and at the closeout of the project.
ArcGIS StoryMap comprised of geospatial layers, images, dynamic text, and/or other elements to
support stakeholder interaction and understanding of the Action Plan.
Based on discussions with the City about the broad scope of this project and the potential for clarification
of specific survey needs to arise as this work advances, this Supplemental Survey Task is included. As the
project progresses, Herrera will provide a more detailed scope and estimate for survey to receive written
approval from the City Project Manager prior to performing any additional work on this task.
Additional physical survey may be needed to achieve the desired level of definition in the hydraulic
model, to understand property boundaries or survey flagged or delineated features.
This task requires written authorization from the City Project Manager prior to being started.
City authorization to initiate Task 6 work will be documented either via email or other written
correspondence from the City Project Manager.
Scope(s) of work and budget tabulation(s) for specific work to be performed using the budget
allocated towards Supplemental Survey, in similar format as the scope and budget of the original
consultant contract.
Project Schedule based on assumed notice to proceed of July 2024.
Task Estimated
Completion
Approx Duration
(Months)
Task 1. Project Management July 2026 24
Task 2.1. Existing Conditions Characterization Desktop Review August 2024 2
Task 2.2. Existing Conditions Characterization Field Assessment November 2024 3
Task 2.3: Existing Conditions Characterization Hydraulic Modeling of
Existing Conditions
December 2024 4
Task 2.4: Existing Conditions Characterization Memo February 2025 2
Task 3.1: Alternatives Analysis Restoration Alternatives Development June 2025 4
Task 3.2: Prioritization and Selection of Alternatives for Action Plan September 2025 3
Task 3.3: Preferred Alternatives Design and Cost Estimates December 2025 3
Task 3.4: Hydraulic Modeling of Preferred Concepts December 2025 5
Task 4. Action Plan May 2026 6
Task 5. StoryMap Development July 2026 TBD
Task 6. Supplemental Survey July 2026 TBD
Co
s
t
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
f
o
r
S
p
r
i
n
g
b
r
o
o
k
C
r
e
e
k
A
c
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
He
r
r
e
r
a
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
N
o
.
2
4
-
0
8
3
8
0
-
0
0
0
5/
2
0
/
2
0
2
4
Ta
s
k
N
o
.
1
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
4
5
6
He
r
r
e
r
a
L
a
b
o
r
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
:
Bu
r
d
e
n
e
d
L
a
b
o
r
R
a
t
e
s
Project
Management
Existing
Conditions
-
Desktop r
eview
Existing C
onditions -
Field
Reconnaissance
Hydraulic
Modeling o
f
Existing
Conditions
Existing C
onditions
Characterization
Memo
Restoration
Alternative
Concept
Development
Prioritization a
nd
Selection o
f
Concepts f
or
Action P
lan
Preferred
Alternative
Concept
Drawings a
nd
Costs
Hydraulic
Modeling o
f
Prefered
Alternative
Concepts
Action P
lan
Story M
ap
Development
Supplemental
Survey
Task S
tart D
ate
6/1/2024
6/1/2024
8/1/2024
8/1/2024
12/2/2024
2/3/2025
6/3/2025
9/3/2025
7/1/2025
12/1/2025
1/1/2026
6/1/2024
Task E
nd D
ate
8/3/2026
8/1/2024
11/1/2024
12/2/2024
2/3/2025
6/3/2025
9/3/2025
12/3/2025
12/1/2025
6/1/2026
4/1/2026
6/1/2026
Task D
uration (
Days)
793
61
92
123
63
120
92
91
153
182
90
730
Staff
Labor C
ategory
2024 B
urdened L
abor R
ates
Ly
o
n
s
,
B
e
t
s
y
P
l
a
n
n
e
r
I
V
$
2
2
7
.
2
5
64
1
9
5
2
1
0
1
4
2
3
1
2
2
2
3
6
4
18
4
Sp
e
a
r
,
E
l
i
z
a
S
c
i
e
n
t
i
s
t
I
V
$
2
0
2
.
9
3
22
2
8
3
2
0
20
1
7
1
9
1
5
0
13
6
4
17
6
Pa
c
k
m
a
n
,
J
a
m
e
s
S
c
i
e
n
t
i
s
t
V
$
2
3
0
.
5
0
7
1
5
1
0
6
1
0
9
0
2
5
2
0
57
Pl
u
m
b
,
R
i
l
e
y
S
c
i
e
n
t
i
s
t
I
I
I
$
1
5
2
.
7
0
0
12
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
Av
o
l
i
o
,
C
h
r
i
s
t
i
n
a
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
V
$
2
6
0
.
5
3
16
2
0
3
4
1
4
1
2
3
2
2
3
2
5
1
0
2
0
6
4
21
6
Va
n
O
r
d
e
n
,
E
m
m
a
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
I
I
$
1
5
6
.
2
2
7
1
0
1
6
3
7
2
2
6
0
2
1
4
6
5
0
2
2
4
0
29
5
Ew
b
a
n
k
,
M
a
r
k
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
V
I
I
$
3
4
1
.
5
6
7
0
0
0
3
4
2
6
0
4
0
0
26
Od
e
-
G
i
l
e
s
,
L
a
u
r
e
n
G
I
S
A
n
a
l
y
s
t
I
I
I
$
1
4
5
.
3
0
1
6
3
8
8
8
2
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
85
Cr
i
c
k
m
o
r
e
,
I
a
n
D
a
v
i
d
G
I
S
A
n
a
l
y
s
t
I
V
$
1
8
8
.
1
7
1
4
2
0
0
40
0
8
0
0
10
0
65
Zh
a
n
g
,
S
h
a
w
r
e
e
S
c
i
e
n
t
i
s
t
I
$
1
1
5
.
6
1
0
6
1
0
0
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
28
Fo
r
e
s
t
e
r
,
K
a
t
e
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
V
I
$
2
2
3
.
7
9
4
0
0
0
0
6
0
3
0
7
6
0
26
Gl
e
a
s
o
n
,
R
a
y
n
a
S
c
i
e
n
t
i
s
t
I
I
I
$
1
4
5
.
7
5
4
0
22
0
16
6
0
27
0
17
2
0
0
11
2
St
e
w
a
r
t
,
R
i
c
k
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
A
c
c
o
u
n
t
a
n
t
I
V
$
1
5
0
.
4
0
38
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
40
Ja
c
k
o
w
i
c
h
,
P
a
m
e
l
a
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
o
r
I
V
$
1
4
3
.
8
3
0
0
0
0
14
1
5
8
0
0
16
0
0
53
Wa
t
n
e
,
W
a
y
n
e
S
c
i
e
n
t
i
s
t
I
V
$
2
1
9
.
8
2
9
1
6
2
0
4
6
1
4
1
4
0
0
3
2
3
91
Ma
r
s
h
a
l
l
,
E
r
i
c
C
A
D
T
e
c
h
n
i
c
i
a
n
I
V
$
1
7
5
.
1
6
0
0
0
12
0
0
0
48
8
0
0
2
70
Ka
y
s
e
r
,
G
r
e
t
c
h
e
n
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
I
V
$
1
9
7
.
0
4
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
14
0
0
0
22
To
t
a
l
H
o
u
r
s
p
e
r
T
a
s
k
18
0
1
3
6
1
8
0
8
5
1
3
5
2
3
8
1
1
9
1
9
0
9
0
1
3
0
6
2
1
9
1
5
6
4
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
L
a
b
o
r
$3
7
,
7
8
0
$
2
7
,
8
9
8
$
3
3
,
8
7
5
$
1
5
,
6
0
2
$
2
4
,
4
3
2
$
4
5
,
8
9
8
$
2
5
,
3
4
1
$
3
6
,
0
4
0
$
1
6
,
0
7
3
$
2
6
,
0
3
6
$
1
1
,
8
0
9
$
4
,
0
7
3
$
3
0
4
,
8
5
9
Subtotal H
errera L
abor
$37,780
$27,898
$33,875
$15,602
$24,432
$45,898
$25,341
$36,040
$16,073
$26,036
$11,809
$4,073
$304,859
4%
Es
c
a
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
e
r
r
e
r
a
L
a
b
o
r
i
n
2
0
2
5
$6
9
7
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
3
2
6
$
1
,
8
3
6
$
1
,
0
1
4
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
1
6
3
$
4
,
0
3
6
8%
Es
c
a
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
e
r
r
e
r
a
L
a
b
o
r
i
n
2
0
2
6
$6
9
7
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
2
,
8
8
3
$
1
,
2
8
6
$
2
,
0
8
3
$
9
4
5
$
3
2
6
$
8
,
2
2
0
Escalated S
ubtotal H
errera L
abor
$39,175
$27,898
$33,875
$15,602
$24,758
$47,734
$26,355
$38,923
$17,359
$28,119
$12,754
$4,562
$317,114
Su
b
c
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
s
Subconsultant
Fu
r
t
a
d
o
$0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
3%
Fe
e
o
n
S
u
b
c
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
s
$0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
3
0
0
$
3
0
0
Subtotal S
ubconsultant C
ost
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$10,300
$10,300
Tr
a
v
e
l
a
n
d
P
e
r
D
i
e
m
(
P
D
)
Item
Unit
Unit C
ost
Au
t
o
U
s
e
M
i
l
e
$
0
.
6
7
24
0
0
56
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
80
2
Lo
d
g
i
n
g
D
a
y
$
2
0
0
.
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
Subtotal P
er D
iem
$161
$0
$777
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$937
Ot
h
e
r
D
i
r
e
c
t
C
o
s
t
s
(
O
D
C
s
)
Item
Unit
Unit C
ost
GP
S
u
n
i
t
(
A
r
r
o
w
1
0
0
w
/
i
P
a
d
)
D
a
y
$
8
5
.
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
DJ
I
P
h
a
n
t
o
m
4
P
r
o
U
A
V
(
d
r
o
n
e
)
D
a
y
$
1
0
0
.
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
UA
S
d
a
t
a
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
g
f
e
e
D
a
t
a
S
e
t
$
1
5
0
.
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
Subtotal O
DCs
$85
$0
$820
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$905
$246
$0
$1,597
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,842
Grand S
ubtotal
$39,421
$27,898
$35,471
$15,602
$24,758
$47,734
$26,355
$38,923
$17,359
$28,119
$12,754
$14,862
$329,257
Grand T
otal
$329,257
Schedule
Total
Subtotal P
er D
iem, L
ab C
osts, a
nd O
DCs